cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553158
title: Appendix C. Means (± SE) of seed set from floral manipulations for each population×year combination along with tests for differences between pairs of treatments.

description: Means (± SE) of seed set from floral manipulations for each population×year combination along with tests for differences between pairs of treatments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553158.v1
title: Appendix C. Means (± SE) of seed set from floral manipulations for each population×year combination along with tests for differences between pairs of treatments.

description: Means (± SE) of seed set from floral manipulations for each population×year combination along with tests for differences between pairs of treatments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553155
title: Appendix D. The relationship between outcross pollen limitation of reproduction and the collection rate of bees from three years of study.

description: The relationship between outcross pollen limitation of reproduction and the collection rate of bees from three years of study.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553155.v1
title: Appendix D. The relationship between outcross pollen limitation of reproduction and the collection rate of bees from three years of study.

description: The relationship between outcross pollen limitation of reproduction and the collection rate of bees from three years of study.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553152
title: Appendix E. Deme assignments from the InStruct analysis for six Clarkia xantiana ssp. xantiana populations.

description: Deme assignments from the InStruct analysis for six Clarkia xantiana ssp. xantiana populations.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553152.v1
title: Appendix E. Deme assignments from the InStruct analysis for six Clarkia xantiana ssp. xantiana populations.

description: Deme assignments from the InStruct analysis for six Clarkia xantiana ssp. xantiana populations.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553149
title: Appendix A. Multiple regressions for effects of damage and density on reproduction.

description: Multiple regressions for effects of damage and density on reproduction.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553149.v1
title: Appendix A. Multiple regressions for effects of damage and density on reproduction.

description: Multiple regressions for effects of damage and density on reproduction.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553137
title: Appendix B. Figures showing the effect of insecticide treatment on damage and effects of damage and density on stem size.

description: Figures showing the effect of insecticide treatment on damage and effects of damage and density on stem size.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553137.v1
title: Appendix B. Figures showing the effect of insecticide treatment on damage and effects of damage and density on stem size.

description: Figures showing the effect of insecticide treatment on damage and effects of damage and density on stem size.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553131
title: Appendix A. Analysis of plant mortality and clipping in relation to patch type.

description: Analysis of plant mortality and clipping in relation to patch type.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553131.v1
title: Appendix A. Analysis of plant mortality and clipping in relation to patch type.

description: Analysis of plant mortality and clipping in relation to patch type.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553128
title: Appendix B. Summary of statistical tests and results.

description: Summary of statistical tests and results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553128.v1
title: Appendix B. Summary of statistical tests and results.

description: Summary of statistical tests and results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553125
title: Appendix A. Relative abundances of grasshopper species at each site and overall relative abundance of each species averaged over all sites.

description: Relative abundances of grasshopper species at each site and overall relative abundance of each species averaged over all sites.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553125.v1
title: Appendix A. Relative abundances of grasshopper species at each site and overall relative abundance of each species averaged over all sites.

description: Relative abundances of grasshopper species at each site and overall relative abundance of each species averaged over all sites.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553122
title: Appendix B. Relative abundances and densities of grasshopper feeding guilds by sites.

description: Relative abundances and densities of grasshopper feeding guilds by sites.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553122.v1
title: Appendix B. Relative abundances and densities of grasshopper feeding guilds by sites.

description: Relative abundances and densities of grasshopper feeding guilds by sites.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553119
title: Appendix C. Analytical methods used in the elemental analyses of plant tissue.

description: Analytical methods used in the elemental analyses of plant tissue.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553119.v1
title: Appendix C. Analytical methods used in the elemental analyses of plant tissue.

description: Analytical methods used in the elemental analyses of plant tissue.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553116
title: Appendix D. Models compared in AIC analyses.

description: Models compared in AIC analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553116.v1
title: Appendix D. Models compared in AIC analyses.

description: Models compared in AIC analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553113
title: Appendix A. Figures showing relationships between occupancies before and after population removal for the 302 species in the 50-ha BCI plot, Panama and the 348 land bird species of the North American Breeding Bird Survey with random removal and systematic removal, respectively.

description: Figures showing relationships between occupancies before and after population removal for the 302 species in the 50-ha BCI plot, Panama and the 348 land bird species of the North American Breeding Bird Survey with random removal and systematic removal, respectively.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553110
title: Appendix A. An example of the surveyed connected ponds located within the southern part of Hyogo Prefecture, Japan.

description: An example of the surveyed connected ponds located within the southern part of Hyogo Prefecture, Japan.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553110.v1
title: Appendix A. An example of the surveyed connected ponds located within the southern part of Hyogo Prefecture, Japan.

description: An example of the surveyed connected ponds located within the southern part of Hyogo Prefecture, Japan.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553107
title: Appendix B. Methods and preliminary analyses of physicochemical pond-water parameters and physical structure of ponds.

description: Methods and preliminary analyses of physicochemical pond-water parameters and physical structure of ponds.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553107.v1
title: Appendix B. Methods and preliminary analyses of physicochemical pond-water parameters and physical structure of ponds.

description: Methods and preliminary analyses of physicochemical pond-water parameters and physical structure of ponds.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553104
title: Appendix C. Mean and standard deviation (SD) of 10 physiochemical parameters of pond water measured in 63 ponds in southwestern Hyogo, Japan.

description: Mean and standard deviation (SD) of 10 physiochemical parameters of pond water measured in 63 ponds in southwestern Hyogo, Japan.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553104.v1
title: Appendix C. Mean and standard deviation (SD) of 10 physiochemical parameters of pond water measured in 63 ponds in southwestern Hyogo, Japan.

description: Mean and standard deviation (SD) of 10 physiochemical parameters of pond water measured in 63 ponds in southwestern Hyogo, Japan.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553101
title: Appendix D. Species of aquatic macrophytes observed in 63 ponds comprising 34 clusters.

description: Species of aquatic macrophytes observed in 63 ponds comprising 34 clusters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553101.v1
title: Appendix D. Species of aquatic macrophytes observed in 63 ponds comprising 34 clusters.

description: Species of aquatic macrophytes observed in 63 ponds comprising 34 clusters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553098
title: Supplement 1. R code for a randomization test.

description: File List random.area.R (md5: 9dde0280e365e0bb72097358f7c47896) Description random.area.R contains R code for a randomization test that continuously selects sample units randomly until the total area of the selected unit exceeds a given threshold. The code may be called from an R program as an external function, or it may be placed in-line within an R program.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553098.v1
title: Supplement 1. R code for a randomization test.

description: File List random.area.R (md5: 9dde0280e365e0bb72097358f7c47896) Description random.area.R contains R code for a randomization test that continuously selects sample units randomly until the total area of the selected unit exceeds a given threshold. The code may be called from an R program as an external function, or it may be placed in-line within an R program.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553095
title: Appendix A. Table providing site descriptions of elevation transect.

description: Table providing site descriptions of elevation transect.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553095.v1
title: Appendix A. Table providing site descriptions of elevation transect.

description: Table providing site descriptions of elevation transect.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553092
title: Appendix B. Figures showing summer and winter soil temperature and moisture across the elevation transect.

description: Figures showing summer and winter soil temperature and moisture across the elevation transect.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553089
title: Appendix C. Table of full statistical models presented in Figs. 1–3.

description: Table of full statistical models presented in Figs. 1–3.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553092.v1
title: Appendix B. Figures showing summer and winter soil temperature and moisture across the elevation transect.

description: Figures showing summer and winter soil temperature and moisture across the elevation transect.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553086
title: Data Paper. Data Paper

description: File List Species_Information.txt – Species data for all studies, including study details, limited life history characteristics, and species descriptions. ASCII text, tab delimited, 20 lines (not including header row), 5 KB.<br> (md5: 3aaff18b97d15ab45fe2bba8f721d20c) Population_data.txt – Details on population locations, habitats, and observed population status at study end and revisit. ASCII text, tab delimited, 82 lines (not including header row), 8 KB.<br> (md5: 73d9b38e52661829d3aea635498922a3) Transition_Matrices.txt – Annual transition matrices and observed stage structures for each population and year of study. ASCII text, tab delimited, 461 lines (not including header row), 249 KB.<br> (md5: f0a49ea65b58c92c5675f629f3589517)Description Demographic transition matrices are one of the most commonly applied population models for both basic and applied ecological research. The relatively simple framework of these models and simple, easily interpretable summary statistics they produce have prompted the wide use of these models across an exceptionally broad range of taxa. Here, we provide annual transition matrices and observed stage structures/population sizes for 20 perennial plant species which have been the focal species for long-term demographic monitoring. These data were assembled as part of the ‘Testing Matrix Models’ working group through the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS). In sum, these data represent 82 populations with &gt; 460 total population-years of data. It is our hope that making these data available will help promote and improve our ability to monitor and understand plant population dynamics. <i>Key words: conservation; Demographic matrix models; ecological forecasting; extinction risk; matrix population models; plant population dynamics; population growth rate</i>.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553089.v1
title: Appendix C. Table of full statistical models presented in Figs. 1–3.

description: Table of full statistical models presented in Figs. 1–3.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553086.v1
title: Data Paper. Data Paper

description: File List Species_Information.txt – Species data for all studies, including study details, limited life history characteristics, and species descriptions. ASCII text, tab delimited, 20 lines (not including header row), 5 KB.<br> (md5: 3aaff18b97d15ab45fe2bba8f721d20c) Population_data.txt – Details on population locations, habitats, and observed population status at study end and revisit. ASCII text, tab delimited, 82 lines (not including header row), 8 KB.<br> (md5: 73d9b38e52661829d3aea635498922a3) Transition_Matrices.txt – Annual transition matrices and observed stage structures for each population and year of study. ASCII text, tab delimited, 461 lines (not including header row), 249 KB.<br> (md5: f0a49ea65b58c92c5675f629f3589517)Description Demographic transition matrices are one of the most commonly applied population models for both basic and applied ecological research. The relatively simple framework of these models and simple, easily interpretable summary statistics they produce have prompted the wide use of these models across an exceptionally broad range of taxa. Here, we provide annual transition matrices and observed stage structures/population sizes for 20 perennial plant species which have been the focal species for long-term demographic monitoring. These data were assembled as part of the ‘Testing Matrix Models’ working group through the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS). In sum, these data represent 82 populations with &gt; 460 total population-years of data. It is our hope that making these data available will help promote and improve our ability to monitor and understand plant population dynamics. <i>Key words: conservation; Demographic matrix models; ecological forecasting; extinction risk; matrix population models; plant population dynamics; population growth rate</i>.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553083
title: Appendix A. Developing data to create Fig. 1.

description: Developing data to create Fig. 1.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553080
title: Appendix B. Predicted fire behavior both with and without litter.

description: Predicted fire behavior both with and without litter.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553083.v1
title: Appendix A. Developing data to create Fig. 1.

description: Developing data to create Fig. 1.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553080.v1
title: Appendix B. Predicted fire behavior both with and without litter.

description: Predicted fire behavior both with and without litter.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553077
title: Appendix A. Development of the multistate closed robust design statistical model for mark–recapture data where the state of individuals can be uncertain.

description: Development of the multistate closed robust design statistical model for mark–recapture data where the state of individuals can be uncertain.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553077.v1
title: Appendix A. Development of the multistate closed robust design statistical model for mark–recapture data where the state of individuals can be uncertain.

description: Development of the multistate closed robust design statistical model for mark–recapture data where the state of individuals can be uncertain.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553074
title: Appendix A. Final models of linear mixed-effect model analyses.

description: Final models of linear mixed-effect model analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553071
title: Appendix B. Full models of linear mixed-effect model analyses before non-significant variables were dropped.

description: Full models of linear mixed-effect model analyses before non-significant variables were dropped.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553068
title: Appendix A. Functional groups and reefs surveyed.

description: Functional groups and reefs surveyed.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553068.v1
title: Appendix A. Functional groups and reefs surveyed.

description: Functional groups and reefs surveyed.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553065
title: Appendix B. Selection of functional form.

description: Selection of functional form.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553065.v1
title: Appendix B. Selection of functional form.

description: Selection of functional form.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553062
title: Appendix C. Effect of grouping species on indices.

description: Effect of grouping species on indices.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553062.v1
title: Appendix C. Effect of grouping species on indices.

description: Effect of grouping species on indices.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553059
title: Appendix A. A table showing the results of a mixed model assessing the rate of recovery of algal cover over the first 18 months of the experiment before any one treatment had reached ambient cover.

description: A table showing the results of a mixed model assessing the rate of recovery of algal cover over the first 18 months of the experiment before any one treatment had reached ambient cover.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553059.v1
title: Appendix A. A table showing the results of a mixed model assessing the rate of recovery of algal cover over the first 18 months of the experiment before any one treatment had reached ambient cover.

description: A table showing the results of a mixed model assessing the rate of recovery of algal cover over the first 18 months of the experiment before any one treatment had reached ambient cover.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553056
title: Appendix B. A figure showing percent cover of perennial algae, Shannon diversity, and density of perennial algae by algal species treatment, and a table of the estimated slopes and standard errors of percent cover of perennial algal species during the recovery period in the presence and absence of herbivores.

description: A figure showing percent cover of perennial algae, Shannon diversity, and density of perennial algae by algal species treatment, and a table of the estimated slopes and standard errors of percent cover of perennial algal species during the recovery period in the presence and absence of herbivores.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553056.v1
title: Appendix B. A figure showing percent cover of perennial algae, Shannon diversity, and density of perennial algae by algal species treatment, and a table of the estimated slopes and standard errors of percent cover of perennial algal species during the recovery period in the presence and absence of herbivores.

description: A figure showing percent cover of perennial algae, Shannon diversity, and density of perennial algae by algal species treatment, and a table of the estimated slopes and standard errors of percent cover of perennial algal species during the recovery period in the presence and absence of herbivores.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553053
title: Appendix C. Tables showing the occurrence and abundance of algal and mobile invertebrate species across treatments.

description: Tables showing the occurrence and abundance of algal and mobile invertebrate species across treatments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553050
title: Appendix A. A photograph depicting the sea urchin species in this study.

description: A photograph depicting the sea urchin species in this study.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553050.v1
title: Appendix A. A photograph depicting the sea urchin species in this study.

description: A photograph depicting the sea urchin species in this study.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553047
title: Appendix B. A table listing SIMPER (similarity of percentages) analyses of taxa and other substrate types contributing to the differences in benthic community structure between urchin mono-assemblages.

description: A table listing SIMPER (similarity of percentages) analyses of taxa and other substrate types contributing to the differences in benthic community structure between urchin mono-assemblages.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553047.v1
title: Appendix B. A table listing SIMPER (similarity of percentages) analyses of taxa and other substrate types contributing to the differences in benthic community structure between urchin mono-assemblages.

description: A table listing SIMPER (similarity of percentages) analyses of taxa and other substrate types contributing to the differences in benthic community structure between urchin mono-assemblages.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553044
title: Appendix C. A table listing SIMPER analyses of taxa and other substrate types contributing to the differences in benthic community structure between two-species urchin multi-assemblages.

description: A table listing SIMPER analyses of taxa and other substrate types contributing to the differences in benthic community structure between two-species urchin multi-assemblages.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553044.v1
title: Appendix C. A table listing SIMPER analyses of taxa and other substrate types contributing to the differences in benthic community structure between two-species urchin multi-assemblages.

description: A table listing SIMPER analyses of taxa and other substrate types contributing to the differences in benthic community structure between two-species urchin multi-assemblages.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553041
title: Appendix D. A table listing SIMPER analyses of taxa and other substrate types contributing to the similarities in benthic community structure among replicates of urchin mono-assemblages.

description: A table listing SIMPER analyses of taxa and other substrate types contributing to the similarities in benthic community structure among replicates of urchin mono-assemblages.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553041.v1
title: Appendix D. A table listing SIMPER analyses of taxa and other substrate types contributing to the similarities in benthic community structure among replicates of urchin mono-assemblages.

description: A table listing SIMPER analyses of taxa and other substrate types contributing to the similarities in benthic community structure among replicates of urchin mono-assemblages.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553038
title: Appendix E. A table listing SIMPER analyses of taxa and other substrate types contributing to the similarities in benthic community structure among replicates of assemblages with and without Tripneustes.

description: A table listing SIMPER analyses of taxa and other substrate types contributing to the similarities in benthic community structure among replicates of assemblages with and without Tripneustes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553038.v1
title: Appendix E. A table listing SIMPER analyses of taxa and other substrate types contributing to the similarities in benthic community structure among replicates of assemblages with and without Tripneustes.

description: A table listing SIMPER analyses of taxa and other substrate types contributing to the similarities in benthic community structure among replicates of assemblages with and without Tripneustes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553035
title: Appendix F. A table showing one-factor ANOVAs testing whether the net change of the percent cover of algal functional groups differed among the three urchin mono-assemblages.

description: A table showing one-factor ANOVAs testing whether the net change of the percent cover of algal functional groups differed among the three urchin mono-assemblages.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553035.v1
title: Appendix F. A table showing one-factor ANOVAs testing whether the net change of the percent cover of algal functional groups differed among the three urchin mono-assemblages.

description: A table showing one-factor ANOVAs testing whether the net change of the percent cover of algal functional groups differed among the three urchin mono-assemblages.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553032
title: Appendix G. A photograph showing a fragment of the substrate grazed within a Tripneustes mono-assemblage.

description: A photograph showing a fragment of the substrate grazed within a Tripneustes mono-assemblage.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3553032.v1
title: Appendix G. A photograph showing a fragment of the substrate grazed within a Tripneustes mono-assemblage.

description: A photograph showing a fragment of the substrate grazed within a Tripneustes mono-assemblage.