cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24417433
title: Data for Carnivory vs Environmental diet for MixSIAR analysis: U. inflata

description: <b>1.</b><b> </b>Carnivorous plants obtain nutrients from arthropod prey (carnivory) and their environment. However, little is known about the seasonal diet shifts between carnivory vs environment among co-occurring carnivorous plant species. Although studies reporting captured prey species for carnivorous plants are abundant, studies investigating the composition of assimilated prey species in their leaves are scarce. Here, we report spatiotemporal dynamics in carnivory vs environmental nutrient acquisition and compositional analysis of prey species assimilated in carnivorous plants of New England (USA).<b>2.</b><b> </b>We measured the natural abundance stable isotope ratios of aquatic <i>Utricularia inflata </i>(Lentibulariaceae), terrestrial <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> (Sarraceniaceae), and <i>Drosera intermedia</i> (Droseraceae), and their nutrient sources during their growing season in two oligotrophic ponds in New England (USA). MixSIAR, a Bayesian stable isotope mixing model, was used to estimate the extent of carnivory for each plant species and the composition of prey species assimilated in terrestrial carnivorous plants.<b>3.</b><b> </b>Aquatic <i>U. inflata</i> spatiotemporally acquired more nutrients from carnivory (<i>c.</i> 70 to 100%) than terrestrial species (<i>c.</i> 30% to 60%). <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> acquired nutrients mainly from Formicidae. The nutrient sources for <i>D. intermedia</i> varied spatiotemporally between arthropod species.<b>4.</b><b> </b>The large contribution of carnivory to the nutrient budget of <i>U. inflata</i> could be due to its lack of roots and high metabolic rate. <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> and <i>D. intermedia</i> could effectively regulate the nutrient level in their habitat and / or could benefit from dissolved organic nitrogen in the environment. Our findings on prey compositions can be used as the first available prior information for the Bayesian approach in future studies. Understanding the sources of nutrients in carnivorous plants can provide invaluable insight into their ecophysiology and conservation and their fragile wetland ecosystems.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24417433.v1
title: Data for Carnivory vs Environmental diet for MixSIAR analysis: U. inflata

description: <b>1.</b><b> </b>Carnivorous plants obtain nutrients from arthropod prey (carnivory) and their environment. However, little is known about the seasonal diet shifts between carnivory vs environment among co-occurring carnivorous plant species. Although studies reporting captured prey species for carnivorous plants are abundant, studies investigating the composition of assimilated prey species in their leaves are scarce. Here, we report spatiotemporal dynamics in carnivory vs environmental nutrient acquisition and compositional analysis of prey species assimilated in carnivorous plants of New England (USA).<b>2.</b><b> </b>We measured the natural abundance stable isotope ratios of aquatic <i>Utricularia inflata </i>(Lentibulariaceae), terrestrial <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> (Sarraceniaceae), and <i>Drosera intermedia</i> (Droseraceae), and their nutrient sources during their growing season in two oligotrophic ponds in New England (USA). MixSIAR, a Bayesian stable isotope mixing model, was used to estimate the extent of carnivory for each plant species and the composition of prey species assimilated in terrestrial carnivorous plants.<b>3.</b><b> </b>Aquatic <i>U. inflata</i> spatiotemporally acquired more nutrients from carnivory (<i>c.</i> 70 to 100%) than terrestrial species (<i>c.</i> 30% to 60%). <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> acquired nutrients mainly from Formicidae. The nutrient sources for <i>D. intermedia</i> varied spatiotemporally between arthropod species.<b>4.</b><b> </b>The large contribution of carnivory to the nutrient budget of <i>U. inflata</i> could be due to its lack of roots and high metabolic rate. <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> and <i>D. intermedia</i> could effectively regulate the nutrient level in their habitat and / or could benefit from dissolved organic nitrogen in the environment. Our findings on prey compositions can be used as the first available prior information for the Bayesian approach in future studies. Understanding the sources of nutrients in carnivorous plants can provide invaluable insight into their ecophysiology and conservation and their fragile wetland ecosystems.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24417430
title: Data for Carnivory vs Environmental diet for MixSIAR analyses: S. purpurea

description: <b>1.</b><b> </b>Carnivorous plants obtain nutrients from arthropod prey (carnivory) and their environment. However, little is known about the seasonal diet shifts between carnivory vs environment among co-occurring carnivorous plant species. Although studies reporting captured prey species for carnivorous plants are abundant, studies investigating the composition of assimilated prey species in their leaves are scarce. Here, we report spatiotemporal dynamics in carnivory vs environmental nutrient acquisition and compositional analysis of prey species assimilated in carnivorous plants of New England (USA).<b>2.</b><b> </b>We measured the natural abundance stable isotope ratios of aquatic <i>Utricularia inflata </i>(Lentibulariaceae), terrestrial <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> (Sarraceniaceae), and <i>Drosera intermedia</i> (Droseraceae), and their nutrient sources during their growing season in two oligotrophic ponds in New England (USA). MixSIAR, a Bayesian stable isotope mixing model, was used to estimate the extent of carnivory for each plant species and the composition of prey species assimilated in terrestrial carnivorous plants.<b>3.</b><b> </b>Aquatic <i>U. inflata</i> spatiotemporally acquired more nutrients from carnivory (<i>c.</i> 70 to 100%) than terrestrial species (<i>c.</i> 30% to 60%). <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> acquired nutrients mainly from Formicidae. The nutrient sources for <i>D. intermedia</i> varied spatiotemporally between arthropod species.<b>4.</b><b> </b>The large contribution of carnivory to the nutrient budget of <i>U. inflata</i> could be due to its lack of roots and high metabolic rate. <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> and <i>D. intermedia</i> could effectively regulate the nutrient level in their habitat and / or could benefit from dissolved organic nitrogen in the environment. Our findings on prey compositions can be used as the first available prior information for the Bayesian approach in future studies. Understanding the sources of nutrients in carnivorous plants can provide invaluable insight into their ecophysiology and conservation and their fragile wetland ecosystems.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24417430.v1
title: Data for Carnivory vs Environmental diet for MixSIAR analyses: S. purpurea

description: <b>1.</b><b> </b>Carnivorous plants obtain nutrients from arthropod prey (carnivory) and their environment. However, little is known about the seasonal diet shifts between carnivory vs environment among co-occurring carnivorous plant species. Although studies reporting captured prey species for carnivorous plants are abundant, studies investigating the composition of assimilated prey species in their leaves are scarce. Here, we report spatiotemporal dynamics in carnivory vs environmental nutrient acquisition and compositional analysis of prey species assimilated in carnivorous plants of New England (USA).<b>2.</b><b> </b>We measured the natural abundance stable isotope ratios of aquatic <i>Utricularia inflata </i>(Lentibulariaceae), terrestrial <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> (Sarraceniaceae), and <i>Drosera intermedia</i> (Droseraceae), and their nutrient sources during their growing season in two oligotrophic ponds in New England (USA). MixSIAR, a Bayesian stable isotope mixing model, was used to estimate the extent of carnivory for each plant species and the composition of prey species assimilated in terrestrial carnivorous plants.<b>3.</b><b> </b>Aquatic <i>U. inflata</i> spatiotemporally acquired more nutrients from carnivory (<i>c.</i> 70 to 100%) than terrestrial species (<i>c.</i> 30% to 60%). <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> acquired nutrients mainly from Formicidae. The nutrient sources for <i>D. intermedia</i> varied spatiotemporally between arthropod species.<b>4.</b><b> </b>The large contribution of carnivory to the nutrient budget of <i>U. inflata</i> could be due to its lack of roots and high metabolic rate. <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> and <i>D. intermedia</i> could effectively regulate the nutrient level in their habitat and / or could benefit from dissolved organic nitrogen in the environment. Our findings on prey compositions can be used as the first available prior information for the Bayesian approach in future studies. Understanding the sources of nutrients in carnivorous plants can provide invaluable insight into their ecophysiology and conservation and their fragile wetland ecosystems.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24417391
title: Data for Carnivory vs Environmental diet MixSIAR analyses: D. intermedia

description: <b>1.</b><b> </b>Carnivorous plants obtain nutrients from arthropod prey (carnivory) and their environment. However, little is known about the seasonal diet shifts between carnivory vs environment among co-occurring carnivorous plant species. Although studies reporting captured prey species for carnivorous plants are abundant, studies investigating the composition of assimilated prey species in their leaves are scarce. Here, we report spatiotemporal dynamics in carnivory vs environmental nutrient acquisition and compositional analysis of prey species assimilated in carnivorous plants of New England (USA).<b>2.</b><b> </b>We measured the natural abundance stable isotope ratios of aquatic <i>Utricularia inflata </i>(Lentibulariaceae), terrestrial <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> (Sarraceniaceae), and <i>Drosera intermedia</i> (Droseraceae), and their nutrient sources during their growing season in two oligotrophic ponds in New England (USA). MixSIAR, a Bayesian stable isotope mixing model, was used to estimate the extent of carnivory for each plant species and the composition of prey species assimilated in terrestrial carnivorous plants.<b>3.</b><b> </b>Aquatic <i>U. inflata</i> spatiotemporally acquired more nutrients from carnivory (<i>c.</i> 70 to 100%) than terrestrial species (<i>c.</i> 30% to 60%). <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> acquired nutrients mainly from Formicidae. The nutrient sources for <i>D. intermedia</i> varied spatiotemporally between arthropod species.<b>4.</b><b> </b>The large contribution of carnivory to the nutrient budget of <i>U. inflata</i> could be due to its lack of roots and high metabolic rate. <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> and <i>D. intermedia</i> could effectively regulate the nutrient level in their habitat and / or could benefit from dissolved organic nitrogen in the environment. Our findings on prey compositions can be used as the first available prior information for the Bayesian approach in future studies. Understanding the sources of nutrients in carnivorous plants can provide invaluable insight into their ecophysiology and conservation and their fragile wetland ecosystems.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24417391.v1
title: Data for Carnivory vs Environmental diet MixSIAR analyses: D. intermedia

description: <b>1.</b><b> </b>Carnivorous plants obtain nutrients from arthropod prey (carnivory) and their environment. However, little is known about the seasonal diet shifts between carnivory vs environment among co-occurring carnivorous plant species. Although studies reporting captured prey species for carnivorous plants are abundant, studies investigating the composition of assimilated prey species in their leaves are scarce. Here, we report spatiotemporal dynamics in carnivory vs environmental nutrient acquisition and compositional analysis of prey species assimilated in carnivorous plants of New England (USA).<b>2.</b><b> </b>We measured the natural abundance stable isotope ratios of aquatic <i>Utricularia inflata </i>(Lentibulariaceae), terrestrial <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> (Sarraceniaceae), and <i>Drosera intermedia</i> (Droseraceae), and their nutrient sources during their growing season in two oligotrophic ponds in New England (USA). MixSIAR, a Bayesian stable isotope mixing model, was used to estimate the extent of carnivory for each plant species and the composition of prey species assimilated in terrestrial carnivorous plants.<b>3.</b><b> </b>Aquatic <i>U. inflata</i> spatiotemporally acquired more nutrients from carnivory (<i>c.</i> 70 to 100%) than terrestrial species (<i>c.</i> 30% to 60%). <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> acquired nutrients mainly from Formicidae. The nutrient sources for <i>D. intermedia</i> varied spatiotemporally between arthropod species.<b>4.</b><b> </b>The large contribution of carnivory to the nutrient budget of <i>U. inflata</i> could be due to its lack of roots and high metabolic rate. <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> and <i>D. intermedia</i> could effectively regulate the nutrient level in their habitat and / or could benefit from dissolved organic nitrogen in the environment. Our findings on prey compositions can be used as the first available prior information for the Bayesian approach in future studies. Understanding the sources of nutrients in carnivorous plants can provide invaluable insight into their ecophysiology and conservation and their fragile wetland ecosystems.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.26885989.v3
title: intercity telemedicine network analysis

description: This folder provides the code and data for analyzing the spatial patterns and influential factors of the intercity telemedicine network (ITN) in China.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24417499
title: Data for Prey Composition MixSIAR Analyses: D. intermedia

description: <b>1.</b><b> </b>Carnivorous plants obtain nutrients from arthropod prey (carnivory) and their environment. However, little is known about the seasonal diet shifts between carnivory vs environment among co-occurring carnivorous plant species. Although studies reporting captured prey species for carnivorous plants are abundant, studies investigating the composition of assimilated prey species in their leaves are scarce. Here, we report spatiotemporal dynamics in carnivory vs environmental nutrient acquisition and compositional analysis of prey species assimilated in carnivorous plants of New England (USA).<b>2.</b><b> </b>We measured the natural abundance stable isotope ratios of aquatic <i>Utricularia inflata </i>(Lentibulariaceae), terrestrial <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> (Sarraceniaceae), and <i>Drosera intermedia</i> (Droseraceae), and their nutrient sources during their growing season in two oligotrophic ponds in New England (USA). MixSIAR, a Bayesian stable isotope mixing model, was used to estimate the extent of carnivory for each plant species and the composition of prey species assimilated in terrestrial carnivorous plants.<b>3.</b><b> </b>Aquatic <i>U. inflata</i> spatiotemporally acquired more nutrients from carnivory (<i>c.</i> 70 to 100%) than terrestrial species (<i>c.</i> 30% to 60%). <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> acquired nutrients mainly from Formicidae. The nutrient sources for <i>D. intermedia</i> varied spatiotemporally between arthropod species.<b>4.</b><b> </b>The large contribution of carnivory to the nutrient budget of <i>U. inflata</i> could be due to its lack of roots and high metabolic rate. <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> and <i>D. intermedia</i> could effectively regulate the nutrient level in their habitat and / or could benefit from dissolved organic nitrogen in the environment. Our findings on prey compositions can be used as the first available prior information for the Bayesian approach in future studies. Understanding the sources of nutrients in carnivorous plants can provide invaluable insight into their ecophysiology and conservation and their fragile wetland ecosystems.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24417499.v1
title: Data for Prey Composition MixSIAR Analyses: D. intermedia

description: <b>1.</b><b> </b>Carnivorous plants obtain nutrients from arthropod prey (carnivory) and their environment. However, little is known about the seasonal diet shifts between carnivory vs environment among co-occurring carnivorous plant species. Although studies reporting captured prey species for carnivorous plants are abundant, studies investigating the composition of assimilated prey species in their leaves are scarce. Here, we report spatiotemporal dynamics in carnivory vs environmental nutrient acquisition and compositional analysis of prey species assimilated in carnivorous plants of New England (USA).<b>2.</b><b> </b>We measured the natural abundance stable isotope ratios of aquatic <i>Utricularia inflata </i>(Lentibulariaceae), terrestrial <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> (Sarraceniaceae), and <i>Drosera intermedia</i> (Droseraceae), and their nutrient sources during their growing season in two oligotrophic ponds in New England (USA). MixSIAR, a Bayesian stable isotope mixing model, was used to estimate the extent of carnivory for each plant species and the composition of prey species assimilated in terrestrial carnivorous plants.<b>3.</b><b> </b>Aquatic <i>U. inflata</i> spatiotemporally acquired more nutrients from carnivory (<i>c.</i> 70 to 100%) than terrestrial species (<i>c.</i> 30% to 60%). <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> acquired nutrients mainly from Formicidae. The nutrient sources for <i>D. intermedia</i> varied spatiotemporally between arthropod species.<b>4.</b><b> </b>The large contribution of carnivory to the nutrient budget of <i>U. inflata</i> could be due to its lack of roots and high metabolic rate. <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> and <i>D. intermedia</i> could effectively regulate the nutrient level in their habitat and / or could benefit from dissolved organic nitrogen in the environment. Our findings on prey compositions can be used as the first available prior information for the Bayesian approach in future studies. Understanding the sources of nutrients in carnivorous plants can provide invaluable insight into their ecophysiology and conservation and their fragile wetland ecosystems.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.26826280
title: Data for making Fig. 5

description: <b>1.</b><b> </b>Carnivorous plants obtain nutrients from arthropod prey (carnivory) and their environment. However, little is known about the seasonal diet shifts between carnivory vs environment among co-occurring carnivorous plant species. Although studies reporting captured prey species for carnivorous plants are abundant, studies investigating the composition of assimilated prey species in their leaves are scarce. Here, we report spatiotemporal dynamics in carnivory vs environmental nutrient acquisition and compositional analysis of prey species assimilated in carnivorous plants of New England (USA).<b>2.</b><b> </b>We measured the natural abundance stable isotope ratios of aquatic <i>Utricularia inflata </i>(Lentibulariaceae), terrestrial <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> (Sarraceniaceae), and <i>Drosera intermedia</i> (Droseraceae), and their nutrient sources during their growing season in two oligotrophic ponds in New England (USA). MixSIAR, a Bayesian stable isotope mixing model, was used to estimate the extent of carnivory for each plant species and the composition of prey species assimilated in terrestrial carnivorous plants.<b>3.</b><b> </b>Aquatic <i>U. inflata</i> spatiotemporally acquired more nutrients from carnivory (<i>c.</i> 70 to 100%) than terrestrial species (<i>c.</i> 30% to 60%). <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> acquired nutrients mainly from Formicidae. The nutrient sources for <i>D. intermedia</i> varied spatiotemporally between arthropod species.<b>4.</b><b> </b>The large contribution of carnivory to the nutrient budget of <i>U. inflata</i> could be due to its lack of roots and high metabolic rate. <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> and <i>D. intermedia</i> could effectively regulate the nutrient level in their habitat and / or could benefit from dissolved organic nitrogen in the environment. Our findings on prey compositions can be used as the first available prior information for the Bayesian approach in future studies. Understanding the sources of nutrients in carnivorous plants can provide invaluable insight into their ecophysiology and conservation and their fragile wetland ecosystems.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.26826280.v1
title: Data for making Fig. 5

description: <b>1.</b><b> </b>Carnivorous plants obtain nutrients from arthropod prey (carnivory) and their environment. However, little is known about the seasonal diet shifts between carnivory vs environment among co-occurring carnivorous plant species. Although studies reporting captured prey species for carnivorous plants are abundant, studies investigating the composition of assimilated prey species in their leaves are scarce. Here, we report spatiotemporal dynamics in carnivory vs environmental nutrient acquisition and compositional analysis of prey species assimilated in carnivorous plants of New England (USA).<b>2.</b><b> </b>We measured the natural abundance stable isotope ratios of aquatic <i>Utricularia inflata </i>(Lentibulariaceae), terrestrial <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> (Sarraceniaceae), and <i>Drosera intermedia</i> (Droseraceae), and their nutrient sources during their growing season in two oligotrophic ponds in New England (USA). MixSIAR, a Bayesian stable isotope mixing model, was used to estimate the extent of carnivory for each plant species and the composition of prey species assimilated in terrestrial carnivorous plants.<b>3.</b><b> </b>Aquatic <i>U. inflata</i> spatiotemporally acquired more nutrients from carnivory (<i>c.</i> 70 to 100%) than terrestrial species (<i>c.</i> 30% to 60%). <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> acquired nutrients mainly from Formicidae. The nutrient sources for <i>D. intermedia</i> varied spatiotemporally between arthropod species.<b>4.</b><b> </b>The large contribution of carnivory to the nutrient budget of <i>U. inflata</i> could be due to its lack of roots and high metabolic rate. <i>Sarracenia purpurea</i> and <i>D. intermedia</i> could effectively regulate the nutrient level in their habitat and / or could benefit from dissolved organic nitrogen in the environment. Our findings on prey compositions can be used as the first available prior information for the Bayesian approach in future studies. Understanding the sources of nutrients in carnivorous plants can provide invaluable insight into their ecophysiology and conservation and their fragile wetland ecosystems.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.k8yrtm
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 9927 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "TaxonKey" : [
 "is Poecilia reticulata Peters, 1859"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 9927 records from 214 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0118344-240626123714530/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.26885989
title: intercity telemedicine network analysis

description: This folder provides the code and data for analyzing the spatial patterns and influential factors of the intercity telemedicine network (ITN) in China.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.26885989.v5
title: intercity telemedicine network analysis

description: This folder provides the code and data for analyzing the spatial patterns and influential factors of the intercity telemedicine network (ITN) in China.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.26885989.v4
title: intercity telemedicine network analysis

description: This folder provides the code and data for analyzing the spatial patterns and influential factors of the intercity telemedicine network (ITN) in China.