cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.25934/00001212
title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Addition of Umeclidinium Bromide (62.5mcg) Once-daily to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol (250/50mcg) Twice-daily, Umeclidinium Bromide (125mcg) Once-daily to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol (250/50mcg) Twice-daily Versus Placebo to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol (250/50mcg) Twice-daily Over 12 Weeks With COPD

description: The purpose of this 12 week study is to evaluate the effects of the addition of umeclidinium bromide (62.5mcg) once-daily to fluticanse propionate/salmeterol (250/50mcg) twice-daily, umeclidinium bromide (125mcg) once-daily to fluticanse propionate/salmeterol (250/50mcg) twice-daily versus placebo to fluticanse propionate/salmeterol (250/50mcg) twice-daily on lung function, COPD-related health status assessments and safety in COPD subjects.
DOI: 10.25934/00001262
title: Study 200165, A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center, Parallel-Group Study to Compare the Efficacy of a 2-Week Treatment With Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray Versus Cetirizine in Adult Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR)

description: This phase IV investigational trial is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a 2-week treatment of fluticasone propionate nasal spray (FPNS) vs. cetirizine on allergic nasal and ocular symptoms and quality of life in adult subjects with SAR. It is hypothesized that FPNS provides greater nasal symptom relief than cetirizine. The primary measure used to test this hypothesis is the change from baseline over two weeks in reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) compared between FPNS and cetirizine. Approximately 648 subjects will be randomized into a 1:1:1:1 ratio of treatment allocation across approximately twenty-five to thirty-five sites in the US during the 2013 fall allergy season. All subjects will be outpatients. The total duration of study will be approximately 21 days including 7 days of screening period, and 14 days of treatment period.
DOI: 10.25934/00002145
title: MEA115588 A Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multi-centre Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Mepolizumab Adjunctive Therapy in Subjects With Severe Uncontrolled Refractory Asthma

description: This study will evaluate two dose regimens of mepolizumab [75mg intravenous (i.v.) or 100mg subcutaneous (SC) every 4 weeks] compared with placebo over a 32 week treatment period in subjects with severe refractory asthma with elevated blood eosinophils. Efficacy will be measured by a reduction in the frequency of asthma exacerbations. Additional efficacy assessments will include measurements of lung function, symptom scores, and quality of life. Safety will be assessed by clinical laboratory samples, ECGs, immunogenicity and adverse events. This study is intended to replicate the Phase IIb/III study MEA112997. Subjects in MEA115588, who meet all eligibility criteria at screening visit, will enter the run-in period. Those subjects that are not able/eligible to be randomised at the end of the 6 week run-in period will be deemed run-in failures. Subjects will remain on their current maintenance therapy throughout the run-in, double-blind treatment administration and follow-up periods. Subjects who meet the randomisation eligibility criteria will be randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive one of the following treatments every 4 weeks for a total of 8 doses: Mepolizumab 75 miligram (mg) i.v. and placebo SC, or Mepolizumab 100 mg SC and placebo i.v. or Placebo i.v. and placebo SC. Subjects that receive all 8 doses of double-blind treatment, and meet the eligibility criteria for the Open-Label Extension (OLE) Study, will be offered the opportunity to participate in the OLE trial.
DOI: 10.25934/00002465
title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of the Addition of SYR-322 25 mg Versus Dose Titration From 30 mg to 45 mg of Pioglitazone HCl (ACTOS®) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Control on a Combination of Metformin and 30 mg of Pioglitazone HCl Therapy

description: The purpose of the study is to compare the effect of adding alogliptin, once daily (QD), to the ongoing treatment regimen of pioglitazone HCl and metformin in patients with inadequate glycemic control.
DOI: 10.25934/00002519
title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Alogliptin Plus Metformin, Alogliptin Alone, or Metformin Alone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

description: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of alogliptin combined with metformin, once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID), in participants with Type 2 Diabetes.
DOI: 10.25934/00002552
title: A Phase 3 Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of SYR-322 When Used in Combination With Insulin Preparation in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes in Japan

description: To determine the efficacy and safety of SYR-322 (alogliptin) 25-mg, once daily (QD), in patients with diabetes when used in combination with insulin.
DOI: 10.25934/00002556
title: Double-blind Comparative Study of SYR-472

description: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with SYR-472 in diabetic patients.
DOI: 10.25934/00003508
title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Parallel Group Efficacy and Safety Study of BI 1356 (5 mg) Administered Orally Once Daily Over 24 Weeks, With an Open-label Extension to One Year (Placebo Patients Switched to BI 1356), in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Insufficient Glycaemic Control Despite a Therapy of Metformin in Combination With a Sulphonylurea

description: The objective of the current study is to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of BI 1356 (5 mg once daily) compared to placebo given for 24 weeks as add-on therapy to metformin in combination with a sulphonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with insufficient glycaemic control.
DOI: 10.25934/00003517
title: A Double-blind Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of BI 1356 5 mg and 10 mg vs. Placebo for 12 Weeks and vs. Voglibose 0.6 mg for 26 Weeks in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Insufficient Glycaemic Control, Followed by an Extension Study to 52 Weeks to Evaluate Long-term Safety

description: The objective of the current study is to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Linagliptin (BI 1356) (5 mg or 10 mg / once daily) compared to placebo given for 12 weeks and voglibose for 26 weeks as mono therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with insufficient glycaemic control. Furthermore, long-term safety is evaluated with an extension treatment to 52 weeks.
DOI: 10.25934/00003605
title: A Randomized, Active-controlled, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel Group Design, Multi-center Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of 2.5 µg and 5 µg Tiotropium Inhalation Solution Delivered by the Respimat Inhaler With Tiotropium Inhalation Capsules 18 µg Delivered by the HandiHaler (TIOSPIR)

description: Direct comparison studies of the tiotropium HandiHaler® 18 µg and Respimat® 5 µg formulations have been limited to 4-week crossover studies. Therefore, prospective data from a trial of adequate size and duration is required to establish that compared to tiotropium HandiHaler®, tiotropium Respimat® will have (a) similar effects on safety and (b) similar or superior effects on exacerbations.
DOI: 10.25934/00003620
title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Parallel Group Efficacy and Safety Trial of BI 10773 (10 and 25 mg Administered Orally Once Daily) Over 24 Weeks in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Insufficient Glycaemic Control Despite a Background Therapy of Pioglitazone Alone or in Combination With Metformin

description: This study will investigate the efficacy and safety of BI 10773 in type 2 diabetic patients in order to provide these data for approval for BI 10773 by regulatory authorities as an antidiabetic agent as add-on therapy to pioglitazone alone or in combination with metformin.
DOI: 10.25934/00003621
title: A Randomized, db, Placebo Controlled Parallel Group Efficacy and Safety Study Over 24 Weeks in T2D Patients in China

description: In this randomised, double-blind, parallel group trial, the safety and efficacy of 5 mg of Linagliptin administered orally once daily will be compared with a placebo after 24 weeks of treatment in monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and insufficient glycaemic control.
DOI: 10.25934/00003648
title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Active-comparator Controlled Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Linagliptin Co-administered With Metformin QD at Evening Time Versus Metformin BID Over 14 Weeks in Treatment Naive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Insufficient Glycaemic Control

description: The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of the combination therapy of linagliptin and metformin at submaximal doses in reduction of Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and metformin pre-specified gastro-intestinal (GI) side effects in treatment naive patients of with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
DOI: 10.25934/00003665
title: A Phase III Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel Group Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Twice Daily Administration of the Fix Dose Combination of Linagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin 500 mg, or of Linagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin 1000 mg, With the Individual Components of Metformin (500 mg or 1000 mg, Twice Daily), and Linagliptin (5.0 mg, Once Daily) Over 24 Weeks in Treatment naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Insufficient Glycaemic Control

description: Reduced factorial design study with 24 week randomized treatment of initial combination therapy with linagliptin and metformin in T2DM patients
DOI: 10.25934/00003688
title: A Multiple Dose Comparison of Tiotropium Inhalation Capsules, Salmeterol Inhalation Aerosol and Placebo in a Six-Month, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Safety and Efficacy Study in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

description: To compare the long -term (six month) bronchodilator efficacy and safety of tiotropium inhalation capsules, salmeterol inhalation aerosol and placebo in patients with COPD. A secondary objective of this study was to compare the impact of tiotropium and salmeterol on humanistic and economic health outcomes, such as quality of life, patient preference and Health Resource Utilisation in this patient population.
DOI: 10.25934/00003705
title: A PROBE (Prospective, Randomised, Open-Label, Blinded Endpoint) Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Telmisartan 40-80mg Once Daily Compared With 10-20 mg Enalapril Once Daily Over a Period of 24 Weeks in Elderly Patients With Blood Hypertension

description: Study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of Telmisartan 40-80 mg once daily compared with enalapril 10-20 mg once daily in elderly patients with arterial hypertension.
DOI: 10.25934/00003891
title: A Long Term, Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Determine the Effect of Albiglutide, When Added to Standard Blood Glucose Lowering Therapies, on Major Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

description: Albiglutide is an analogue of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), used to treat type 2 diabetes This study will test whether albiglutide affects the occurrence of major cardiovascular events such as heart attacks or strokes and other important medical outcomes in persons with type 2 diabetes, when used alone or added to other diabetes treatments.
DOI: 10.25934/00004294
title: A Repeat-dose Study in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacodynamics, of Albiglutide Liquid Drug Product

description: This is a phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel group, repeat-dose, study of 26 weeks duration to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacodynamic response of albiglutide liquid drug product relative to the commercial lyophilized drug product. The study will specifically evaluate the potential for immunogenicity (example [e.g.] incidences of anti-drug antibodies [ADA]) and injection site reactions (ISRs). Albiglutide is a novel analogue of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) with a sufficiently long half-life to permit once a week injection. Currently, lyophilized albiglutide and the diluent are provided in a dual chamber cartridge (DCC), single-dose pen injector, requiring reconstitution prior to use. A liquid formulation of albiglutide will enable the commercialization of a liquid product in a single dose, ready-to-use prefilled syringe in an auto-injector. The primary hypothesis of this study is to test that liquid drug product will provide glycemic control (as measured by HbA1c change from baseline) non-inferior to lyophilized drug product for a period of 26 weeks of treatment in subjects with T2DM. This study will comprise of 3 study periods : screening (2 weeks), treatment (26 weeks) and for those subjects not entering the extension study a follow-up period (8 weeks). Approximately 300 subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either Albiglutide active liquid auto-injector (LAI) plus Placebo lyophilized DCC pen injector (lyophilized DCC PI); or, Albiglutide lyophilized DCC PI plus Placebo LAI.
DOI: 10.25934/00005089
title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Comparative Study and a Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-label, Long-term Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SYR-472 When Orally Administered at a Dose of 25 mg Once Weekly in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Complicated by Severe Renal Impairment or End-stage Renal Disease

description: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of trelagliptin when administered at a dose of 25 mg once weekly using placebo as a control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated by severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease and inadequate glycemic control despite diet and/or exercise therapy (if given) or despite treatment with one antidiabetic drug in addition to diet and/or exercise therapy (if given); and to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of trelagliptin when administered at a dose of 25 mg once weekly to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated by severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease.
DOI: 10.25934/00005092
title: Treatment Preference for Weekly DPP-4 Inhibitors Versus Daily DPP-4 Inhibitors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

description: The purpose of this study is to examine the participant's preference for treatment with once-weekly dosing of DPP-4 inhibitor trelagliptin versus once-daily dosing of DPP-4 inhibitor alogliptin among the participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are being treated with once-daily dosing of DPP-4 inhibitor.
DOI: 10.25934/00005120
title: Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Certolizumab Pegol in Subjects With Adult-Onset Active and Progressive Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)

description: Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) in subjects with adult onset active and progressive Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA).
DOI: 10.25934/00005121
title: Phase IIIb, Multinational, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Certolizumab Pegol, a Pegylated Fab' Fragment of a Humanized Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor(TNF)-Alpha Monoclonal Antibody, Administered in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease.

description: The primary objective of the study is to evaluate efficacy of certolizumab pegol in inducing clinical remission in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease as compared with placebo based on Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score at Week 6.
DOI: 10.25934/00007433
title: The Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly, Subcutaneous Dulaglutide Compared to Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Metformin and/or a Sulfonylurea

description: The purpose of this study is to examine if once-weekly dulaglutide is efficient and safe compared to once-daily insulin glargine in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have inadequate glycemic control with 1 or 2 oral antihyperglycemic medications (OAM) (metformin and/or a sulfonylurea), in addition to any healthy lifestyle changes recommended by their healthcare providers.
DOI: 10.25934/pr00007624
title: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, 2-arm Parallel-group, Multicenter Study With a 24-week Double-blind Treatment Period Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Lixisenatide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Insufficiently Controlled With Insulin Glargine and Metformin

description: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the benefits and risks of lixisenatide (AVE0010), in comparison to placebo, as an add-on treatment to insulin glargine and metformin with or without thiazolidinediones (TZDs), over a period of 24 weeks of treatment. The primary objective is to assess the effects of lixisenatide in comparison to placebo, when added to insulin glargine and metformin, on glycemic control in terms of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction (absolute change) at Week 24. The secondary objectives are to assess the effects of lixisenatide on the percentage of patients reaching HbA1c less than (<) 7 percent (%) and less than or equal to (<=) 6.5%, plasma glucose (fasting, postprandial during a standardized meal challenge test, 7-point self monitored profiles), body weight, insulin glargine doses, to evaluate safety and tolerability (including anti-lixisenatide antibody assessment), and to assess the impact on treatment satisfaction using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (state) (DTSQs) in the participating countries where it is validated.
DOI: 10.25934/pr00007628
title: A Randomized, Open-label, Active-controlled, 2-arm Parallel-group, Multicenter 24-week Study Followed by an Extension Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of AVE0010 Versus Exenatide on Top of Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Not Adequately Controlled With Metformin

description: The purpose of this study is to compare the benefits and risks of lixisenatide (AVE0010) in comparison to exenatide (Byetta®), as an add-on treatment to metformin, over a period of 24 weeks of treatment, followed by an extension. The primary objective is to assess the effects of lixisenatide in comparison to exenatide (Byetta®), as an add-on treatment to metformin, on glycemic control in terms of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction (absolute change) at Week 24. The secondary objectives are to assess the effects of lixisenatide on percentage of patients reaching HbA1c less than 7 percent (%) or HbA1c less than or equal to (<=) 6.5%, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight; to evaluate safety, tolerability and to assess the impact of gastrointestinal tolerance on quality of life (QoL) (patient assessment of upper gastrointestinal disorders - quality of life [PAGI-QOL]).
DOI: 10.25934/pr00007784
title: A 24-week, Multicenter, International, Randomized (1:1), Parallel-group, Open-label, Comparative Study of Insulin Glargine Versus Liraglutide in Insulin-naïve Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Oral Agents and Not Adequately Controlled, Followed by a 24-week Extension Period With Insulin Glargine for Patients Not Adequately Controlled With Liraglutide

description: Primary objective: To demonstrate the superiority of insulin glargine over liraglutide in terms of percentage of patients reaching a Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) < 7% at the end of the comparative period (24 weeks) in Type 2 diabetic patients failing lifestyle management and oral agents Secondary objectives of the comparative period (24 weeks): >To assess the effect of insulin glargine in comparison with liraglutide on:   -  HbA1c level   -  Percentage of patients whose HbA1c has decreased but remains >= 7% at the end of the comparative period   -  Percentage of patients whose HbA1c has increased at the end of the comparative period   -  Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)   -  7-point Plasma Glucose (PG) profiles   -  Hypoglycemia occurrence   -  Body weight   -  Adverse events Objectives of the extension period (24 weeks): >To assess the effect of insulin glargine in patients not adequately controlled with liraglutide on:   -  HbA1c level   -  FPG   -  7-point PG profiles   -  Hypoglycemia occurrence   -  Body weight   -  Adverse events
DOI: 10.25934/00000140
title: An International Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Fondaparinux Versus Control Therapy in a Broad Range of Patients With ST Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction.

description: This is a randomized, double blindcontrolled, parallel group, multi-center, multinational study of fondaparinux vs. control in patients with STEMI (ST segment myocardial infarction) randomized within 24 hours of the onset of symptoms.
DOI: 10.25934/00000169
title: A Phase III, 18 Month, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Clinical Trial to Compare Rosiglitazone Versus Glipizide on the Progression of Atherosclerosis in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Disease (APPROACH)

description: The purpose of this study is to test the safety and effectiveness of rosiglitazone against a sulfonylurea in reducing or slowing the development of atherosclerosis in the blood vessels of the heart.
DOI: 10.25934/00000172
title: A 4 Week Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of GW685698X Aq Nasal Spray 100mcg QD in Adults and Adolescents With Vasomotor Rhinitis

description: The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of GW685698X 100mcg once daily (QD) aqueous nasal spray with vehicle placebo nasal spray in adult and adolescent subjects (12 years of age and older) with vasomotor rhinitis (VMR).
DOI: 10.25934/00000174
title: A 4 Week Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of GW685698X Aq Nasal Spray 100mcg QD in Adults and Adolescents With Vasomotor Rhinitis

description: The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of GW685698X 100mcg once daily (QD) aqueous nasal spray with vehicle placebo nasal spray in adult and adolescent subjects (12 years of age and older) with vasomotor rhinitis (VMR).