cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6325-1
title: Investigating Musical Performance: Comparative Studies in Advanced Musical Learning, 2006-2007
title: IMP

description: &lt;i&gt;Investigating Musical Performance: Comparative Studies in Advanced Musical Learning, 2006-2007&lt;/i&gt; (IMP) is a mixed methods study was devised as a two-year comparative study to investigate how Western classical, popular, jazz and Scottish traditional musicians deepen and develop their learning about performance in undergraduate, postgraduate and wider music community contexts. IMP was conceived as a multi-site, mixed methods research project that drew equally on the strengths and expertise of the four partner higher education institutions (HEIs): the Institute of Education, London; Royal Scottish Academy of Music and Drama, Glasgow; Leeds College of Music and the University of York. Each HEI had significant experience in the education of undergraduate and/or postgraduate musicians in at least two of the four focus musical genres. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; The data available from the UKDA include quantitative data from a survey of undergraduate music students and portfolio career musicians using an innovative PDF survey instrument. The survey was then repeated the following year with some respondents. The qualitative data include semi-structured interviews with 27 selected case studies. These were selected on the basis of ensuring a representative range of experiences and backgrounds from those who had completed the questionnaire survey. They specialised in a wide range of instruments, including strings, woodwind, brass, piano/keyboard, voice, bass guitar, percussion, Scottish pipes and clarsach. Complementary data were also obtained from eight focus groups.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; The project was part of the ESRC's &lt;a href="http://www.tlrp.org/" title="Teaching and Learning Research Programme"&gt;Teaching and Learning Research Programme&lt;/a&gt; (TLRP). Further information about the project can be found on the &lt;a href="http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/esrcinfocentre/viewawardpage.aspx?awardnumber=RES-139-25-0258" title="Investigating Musical Performance (IMP): Comparative Studies in Advanced Musical Learning"&gt;ESRC award&lt;/a&gt; web page, and the TLRP web site &lt;a href="http://www.tlrp.org/proj/Welch.html" title ="IMP project"&gt;IMP&lt;/a&gt; page&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6327-1
title: Sustainable and Holistic Food Chains for Recycling Livestock Waste to Land, 2005-2007
title: Sustainable and Safe Recycling of Livestock Waste

description: &lt;p&gt;This is a mixed method dataset. The study is part of the Rural Economy and Land Use (RELU) programme.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;The project aimed to determine if current livestock and manure management practices, attitudes to microbial pollution and decision making represented a risk of pathogen transfers to watercourses from farms. It sought to make recommendations which would reduce those risks, and to estimate the costs and wider benefits accrued. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;An important methodological innovation in the development of both field- and farm-scale risk assessment tools was the use of expert judgments to establish values for different drivers of Faecal Indicator Organisms (FIO) risk, be they socio-economic (income, infrastructure, knowledge) or physically (source, transfer, connectivity) based risk factors. Through the development of the field-scale risk tool, it concluded that of the fields surveyed in the catchment, the majority fell within the negligible and low risk category. The season accommodating the highest proportion of ‘very high’ risk fields was found to be summer (4%) whereas autumn, spring and summer were all ranked as having the lowest proportion (2%) of seasonal ‘very high’ risk.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;The farm scale risk tool was designed to indicate the likelihood of FIO loss from farm enterprises and to highlight key attributes of the farm system contributing to FIO loss. The 4 key risk components were conceptualised as: accumulating microbial burden to land, landscape transfer potential, infrastructural characteristics of the enterprise, and social and economic obstacles to taking action. Understanding how the four components interact to influence risk is key to effective microbial risk assessment on the farm. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Further information for this study may be found through the &lt;a href="https://www.researchcatalogue.esrc.ac.uk/grants/RES-224-25-0086/read" target="_blank"&gt;ESRC Research Catalogue webpage: Sustainable and Holistic Food Chains for Recycling Livestock Waste to Land.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://relu.data-archive.ac.uk/explore-data/search-browse/project/?ID=RES-224-25-0086"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6329-1
title: Emergency Department Survey, 2008
title: National Health Service Patient Survey Programme, 2003-
title: NHS Patient Survey Programme

description: &lt;p&gt;The National Patient Survey Programme is one of the largest patient survey programmes in the world. It provides an opportunity to monitor experiences of health and provides data to assist with registration of trusts and monitoring on-going compliance. Understanding what people think about the care and treatment they receive is crucial to improving the quality of care being delivered by healthcare organisations. One way of doing this is by asking people who have recently used the health service to tell the Care Quality Commission (CQC) about their experiences.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The CQC will use the results from the surveys in the regulation, monitoring and inspection of NHS acute trusts (or, for community mental health service user surveys, providers of mental health services) in England. Data are used in CQC Insight, an intelligence tool which identifies potential changes in quality of care and then supports deciding on the right regulatory response. Survey data will also be used to support CQC inspections.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Each survey has a different focus. These include patients' experiences in outpatient and accident and emergency departments in Acute Trusts, and the experiences of people using mental health services in the community.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;History of the programme&lt;br&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The National Patient Survey Programme began in 2002, and was then conducted by the Commission for Health Improvement (CHI), along with the Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection (CHAI). Administration of the programme was taken over by the Healthcare Commission in time for the 2004 series. On 1 April 2009, the CQC was formed, which replaced the Healthcare Commission.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Further information about the National Patient Survey Programme may be found on the CQC &lt;a href="http://www.cqc.org.uk/content/surveys" title="Patient Survey Programme" ,="" target="_blank"&gt;Patient Survey Programme&lt;/a&gt; web pages.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt; The Emergency Department Survey was designed to provide actionable feedback to each participating trust on patients’ views of the care they had received in Accident and Emergency departments in England, as well as providing the Care Quality Commission with patient-focused indicators to feed into the 2008 performance ratings for acute and specialist NHS trusts.&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6331-1
title: Social Exclusion, Spaces of Household Economic Practice and Post-Socialism, 1989-2006

description: This mixed methods study examines the ways in which households and individuals negotiate and cope with forms of social exclusion emerging from the introduction of the market economy in central European cities. The research examines the strategies adopted by households and individuals, how they link informal and formal economic activities, and how they are constituted differently in contrasting geographical contexts. The purpose of the research is to provide policy-relevant results to inform discussions of social policy within the context of European Union enlargement and to contribute to theoretical debates concerning how the emergent economies of post-socialism are understood. The research involves a comparative study of the resources and strategies employed by households and individuals in two urban communities (in Bratislava, Slovakia and Krakow, Poland). It uses a range of methodological techniques to examine the extent, form and functioning of these strategies. This multi-method approach includes statistical analysis of data on social exclusion in the urban communities, a questionnaire survey of households, in-depth semi-structured interviews with household members, multi-sited ethnographies of household and community economic practices, and semi-structured interviews with key informants in relevant institutions.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; Further information about the project, including publications, may be found on the ESRC &lt;a href="http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/esrcinfocentre/viewawardpage.aspx?awardnumber=RES-000-23-0695" title = "Social Exclusion, Spaces of Household Economic Practice and Post-Socialism"&gt; Social Exclusion, Spaces of Household Economic Practice and Post-Socialism&lt;/a&gt; grant award web page.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6332-1
title: Comparing Love and Domestic Violence in Heterosexual and Same Sex Relationships, 2005-2006

description: &lt;i&gt;Comparing Love and Domestic Violence in Heterosexual and Same Sex Relationships, 2005-2006&lt;/i&gt; is a mixed methods study. The study sought to increase knowledge and understanding of domestic violence in same sex relationships and had the following research aims:&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;to explore the scope of domestic violence in same sex relationships via the first comprehensive national community survey&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;to identify similarities and differences between the experiences of those in same sex and heterosexual relationships, including use of help-seeking strategies via the criminal justice system or other agencies&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;to explore the impact of narratives of love as rationales for violence in heterosexual and same sex relationships, and develop comparative understandings of ways in which sexuality may or may not influence both expectations about and the 'doing' of adult intimate relationships&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;to explore existing analyses and develop new theories regarding domestic violence in adult relationships, by comparing the experiences of individuals in 'gender free' relationships (same sex relationships) with those in gendered (heterosexual) relationships and by focusing on narratives of love rather than gender roles&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;These aims and objectives were achieved via a same sex community survey examining incidence of domestic violence in the preceding 12 months and previously, semi-structured interviews with heterosexual women, men, lesbians and gay men and focus groups (focus group data are not included in the collection available from the UKDA).&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; Further information is available from the ESRC &lt;a href="http://www.esrc.ac.uk/my-esrc/grants/RES-000-23-0650/read" title ="Comparing Love and Domestic Violence in Heterosexual and Same Sex Relationships"&gt;Comparing Love and Domestic Violence in Heterosexual and Same Sex Relationships&lt;/a&gt; award web page.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6341-1
title: Productivity and Household Economy in a Tyneside Mining Community, 1774-1867

description: This project employed computer-aided longitudinal analysis of work records from a nineteenth-century coal mining community. It examined how household labour supplies and exogenous demand for coal were mediated through the work environment. It sought to amend existing views of the historic family economy by assessing the participation rates of individuals through detailed evidence of their day-to-day interactions with the workplace. In particular, it examined the effects of the household life cycle, the occupations of children and the non-mining occupations of females. The effects of technical, organisational and seasonal changes in the workplace and their effects upon the age structure of the mining labour force were also investigated.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6342-1
title: Learning to Perform: Data from a United Kingdom Conservatoire of Music, 2004-2007

description: This is a mixed-methods longitudinal data set. This project looked at the 'secret garden' of conservatoires of music. This is an area of higher education where the one-to-one lesson format has traditionally formed the core of teaching and learning. Conservatoires have hitherto been under-researched. The project addressed this gap, working towards a new understanding of how western classical musicians are created and how their learning experiences and outcomes can be enhanced. This collection contains longitudinal data from September 2004 until July 2007, drawing on interviews, questionnaires, observation and routine institutional assessments. In particular, 117 in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 conservatoire students, and 276 conservatoire students completed one or more of six structured and semi-structured questionnaires. Further information can be found at the project's ESRC award &lt;a href="http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/esrcinfocentre/viewawardpage.aspx?awardnumber=RES-139-25-0101web page." title="ESRC funding award web page"&gt;web page&lt;/a&gt;.
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6345-1
title: Offending, Crime and Justice Survey, 2003-2006: Longitudinal Analysis Data
title: Offending, Crime and Justice Survey, 2003-2006
title: OCJS; Crime and Justice Survey

description: The &lt;i&gt;Offending, Crime and Justice Survey&lt;/i&gt; (OCJS) (also sometimes known as the &lt;i&gt;Crime and Justice Survey&lt;/i&gt;), was the first national longitudinal, self-report offending survey for England and Wales. The series began in 2003, the initial survey representing the first wave in a planned four-year rotating panel study, and ended with the 2006 wave. A longitudinal dataset based on the four years of the study was released in 2009 (held at the Archive under SN 6345). &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The OCJS was commissioned by the Home Office, with the overall objective of providing a solid base for measuring the prevalence of offending and drug use in the general population of England and Wales. The survey was developed in response to a significant gap in data on offending in the general population, as opposed to particular groups such as convicted offenders. A specific aim of the series was to monitor trends in offending among young people.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The OCJS series was designed as a 'rotating panel' which means that in each subsequent year, part of the previous year's sample was re-interviewed, and was augmented by a further 'fresh' sample to ensure a cross-sectional representative sample of young people. The aim of this design was to fulfil two objectives: firstly, to provide a solid cross-sectional base from which to monitor year-on-year measures of offending, drug use, and contact with the CJS over the four-year tracking period (2003-2006); and secondly, to provide longitudinal insight into individual behaviour and attitudinal changes over time, and to enable the Home Office to identify temporal links between and within the key survey measures.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The OCJS was managed by a team of researchers in the Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate. The Home Office commissioned BMRB Social Research and the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen) to conduct the surveys jointly. Both organisations were involved in developing the surveys and, at each wave, the fieldwork was split between the two agencies.&lt;br&gt;
 The longitudinal analysis of the OCJS, based on the four survey years, 2003-2006, aimed to describe the levels of change in offending behaviour, antisocial behaviour (ASB) and drug use within individuals. It also covered the timing of transitions into and out of offending, ASB and drug use. The analysis intended to:&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;identify the most common ages for starting to offend and use illegal drugs, and the ages of desistance&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;help to identify young people who are most at risk of offending and using drugs&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;explore the patterns of offending and drug use, including uptake and desistance among young people&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;Further information can be found in the user guide but users are also advised to consult the individual OCJS wave documentation.&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6346-1
title: Adult Education Survey, 2005
title: National Adult Learning Surveys, 1997-
title: AES; National Adult Learning Survey, 2005; NALS 2005

description: The &lt;i&gt;Adult Education Survey&lt;/i&gt; (AES) is part of the European Union (EU) statistics on education and lifelong learning. The surveys have been carried out by 29 countries in the EU, European Free Trade Association (EFTA) and candidate countries between 2005 and 2008. The EU AES is a pilot exercise which for the first time proposed a common framework including a standard questionnaire, tools and quality reporting. The surveys are planned to be conducted every five years with the next being undertaken in 2011-2012. In Great Britain, AES was conducted within the existing &lt;i&gt;National Adult Learning Survey&lt;/i&gt; (NALS) series. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Further information about the AES can be found on &lt;a href="http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/microdata/adult_education_survey" title ="Eurostat AES"&gt;Eurostat AES&lt;/a&gt; web page.&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6347-2
title: Active People Survey, 2007-2008
title: Active People Survey, 2005-2016
title: APS2

description: The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Active People Survey&lt;/span&gt; commenced in October 2005 and was commissioned by Sports England. The primary objective of the survey was to measure levels of participation in sport and active recreation and its contribution to improving the health of the nation. Sport and active recreation included walking and cycling for recreation in addition to more traditional formal and informal spots. When measuring sports participation the survey not only recorded the type of activity but also the frequency, intensity and duration of the activity. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Active People Survey&lt;/span&gt; was replaced by the &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Active Lives Survey&lt;/span&gt; in November 2015.  &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Active Lives&lt;/span&gt; is a new survey with a different methodology and intended to measure different outcomes from those in the &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Active People Survey&lt;/span&gt;, however there are similarities as it was important that data could be reproduced on some of the key measures.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More general information can be found on the Sport England &lt;a href="https://www.sportengland.org/research/active-lives-survey/" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"&gt;Active Lives Survey&lt;/a&gt; webpage and the &lt;a href="https://activelives.sportengland.org/" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"&gt;Active Lives Online&lt;/a&gt; website, including reports and data tables.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; For the third edition (October 2015), the data file was replaced with a new version to reflect changes in the Sport England core measure, the ‘1x30’ indicator. The documentation has also been updated.
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6351-1
title: Living in Wales: Household Survey, 2008
title: Living in Wales, 2004-2008
title: LIW; Welsh Household and Dwelling Survey; Welsh House Condition Survey

description: The &lt;i&gt;Living in Wales&lt;/i&gt; (LIW) survey series, which ran from 2004-2008, was the main general source of statistical information about households and the condition of homes in Wales. The LIW survey was also referred to as the &lt;i&gt;Welsh Household and Dwelling Survey&lt;/i&gt; and replaced the former &lt;i&gt;Welsh House Condition Survey&lt;/i&gt; (WHCS), which was last conducted in 1997 and 1998, when a Household Survey was completed in 1997 and a Property Survey in 1998.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The LIW survey had two separate but linked components: the Household Survey and the Property Survey. The Household Survey was completed annually from 2004 and was conducted as a face-to-face interview with the household reference person (HRP) or another appropriate adult. It aimed to provide additional information to complement the Property Survey, but also to provide information about the community, the use of the Welsh language, the health of the members of the household, the values and opinions of the respondent as well as demographic characteristics. The Property Survey was conducted in 2004 and 2008 (held under SNs 7201 and 7202 respectively) and comprised an internal and external assessment of the property which was completed by a qualified surveyor. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The &lt;i&gt;Living in Wales&lt;/i&gt; survey closed in 2008. From 2009/2010 onwards, it has been replaced by the &lt;i&gt;National Survey for Wales&lt;/i&gt; (held at the Archive under GN 33435). Further information can be found on the Welsh Assembly Government &lt;a href="http://wales.gov.uk/about/aboutresearch/social/ocsropage/living-wales/?lang=en" title="Living in Wales"&gt;Living in Wales&lt;/a&gt; web page.&lt;br&gt;