cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.15468/dl.59x387
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 5469 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "Geometry POLYGON((-15.4517 11.64354,-15.79779 11.63454,-16.17758 11.66753,-16.37053 11.62554,-16.51142 11.54453,-16.51754 11.27132,-16.42566 11.10908,-16.21433 10.98583,-15.65384 10.92268,-15.59871 10.99485,-15.51602 11.44848,-15.4517 11.64354))",
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 5469 records from 46 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0134970-230224095556074/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144955
title: TABLE 6 in Systematic assessment of the brown tree frog (Anura: Pelodryadidae: Litoria ewingii) reveals two endemic species in South Australia

description: TABLE 6. Summary of metric variation in morphological analyses for Litoria ewingii, L. calliscelis and sibilus sp. nov. Measurements are presented as the mean±SD and range.
CharacterLitoria ewingii females malesLitoria calliscelis females malesLitoria sibilis sp. nov. females malesSVL37.4±4.431.4±2.134.1±4.931.5±2.736.6±4.731.5±2.628.1–44.828.5–35.527.8–40.327.4–33.727.9–42.725.1–34.5Fin3DW1.3±0.41.0±0.21.6±0.41.1±0.11.4±0.41.1±0.20.9–2.20.7–1.21.2–2.21.0–1.31.0–2.00.7–1.4Fin3W0.8±0.20.6±0.10.8±0.10.7±0.11.0±0.20.7±0.20.5–1.20.4–0.80.6–0.90.6–0.80.7–1.20.5–1.0Toe4DW1.2±0.30.9±0.21.4±0.41.0±0.21.4±0.41.0±0.20.7–1.90.5–1.40.9–2.00.8–1.10.8–1.90.6–1.4AL17.8±2.414.9±1.216.7±2.915.1±1.318.3±2.814.7±1.513.5–22.113.4–17.212.4–19.513.2–16.412.9–21.011.3–16.4DFE6.2±0.55.4±0.46.5±1.05.7±0.56.5±1.05.5±0.45.0–7.14.9–6.35.7–8.05.0–6.14.6–7.44.4–5.9EN2.7±0.42.4±0.22.8±0.42.3±0.32.9±0.42.5±0.22.1–3.42.1–2.82.2–3.21.9–2.62.1–3.52.3–3.1ED3.4±0.33.0±0.43.8±0.63.2±0.33.8±0.43.4±0.32.6–3.72.3–3.73.0–4.72.8–3.53.1–4.53.0–4.1THL18.1±2.815.5±1.316.1±2.815.5±1.017.8±2.514.8±1.213.3–22.813.5–17.612.1–19.714.4–16.912.9–21.112.4–16.9FOL26.6±3.722.7±1.925.1±4.322.6±2.027.1±4.422.2±2.320.2–33.119.6–25.919.0–30.219.5–24.419.0–31.716.9–24.5HDD4.7±0.73.8±0.54.7±0.74.0±0.44.9±0.74.0±0.43.3–6.12.8–4.53.7–5.43.4–4.43.8–6.23.5–4.9HL12.6±1.611.1±2.013.9±2.312.6±0.915.2±1.912.8±0.910.3–15.89.0–14.810.7–16.211.1–13.411.8–17.510.9–13.9HW11.0±1.19.6±0.611.3±2.49.9±0.611.6±1.59.8±0.79.1–12.38.6–10.78.3–14.69.2–10.98.5–13.17.9–10.6IMT1.3±0.21.1±0.21.3±0.41.5±0.21.2±0.31.0±0.21.0–1.90.7–1.40.8–1.80.9–1.40.9–1.60.7–1.3IND2.5±0.32.4±0.22.6±0.32.3±0.12.6±0.32.3±0.12.3–3.42.1–2.92.3–2.82.2–2.52.2–3.22.0–2.6IOD3.6±0.33.1±0.43.6±0.33.5±0.23.7±0.43.3±0.32.9–4.02.4–3.63.2–4.13.2–3.63.1–4.32.8–3.7LAL7.9±1.16.8±0.57.5±0.76.9±0.58.3±1.56.9±0.65.9–10.05.6–7.76.3–8.26.3–7.45.4–9.95.4–7.6HAL10.5±1.58.9±0.710.3±1.98.9±0.811.0±1.88.8±1.07.4–13.07.9–10.27.9–12.57.9–9.77.7–12.76.6–10.0NS2.3±0.31.9±0.22.4±0.52.2±0.12.3±0.42.2±0.21.6–2.71.5–2.21.6–3.02.0–2.42.0–2.91.8–2.6FL16.3±2.413.8±1.215.3±2.713.8±1.516.2±2.612.9±1.212.2–20.411.9–16.311.8–18.211.6–15.311.2–19.29.9–14.1SL4.9±0.54.3±0.25.0±0.44.6±0.25.2±0.74.5±0.34.1–5.73.8–4.74.3–5.54.5–4.83.7–5.94.0–5.0TL18.5±2.615.6±1.217.5±3.015.9±1.119.3±2.715.8±1.113.9–23.114.0–18.313.3–20.514.4–17.214.4–22.913.4–17.4UAL6.5±0.65.4±0.95.9±1.05.8±0.66.7±1.45.6±0.75.8–7.74.5–7.45.2–7.35.0–6.53.8–8.34.4–6.9
description: Published as part of Parkin, Tom, Rowley, Jodi J. L., Elliott-Tate, Jessica, Mahony, Michael J., Sumner, Joanna, Melville, Jane & Donnellan, Stephen C., 2024, Systematic assessment of the brown tree frog (Anura: Pelodryadidae: Litoria ewingii) reveals two endemic species in South Australia, pp. 22 in Zootaxa 5406 (1) on page 22, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5406.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/10610157
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144954
title: TABLE 6 in Systematic assessment of the brown tree frog (Anura: Pelodryadidae: Litoria ewingii) reveals two endemic species in South Australia

description: TABLE 6. Summary of metric variation in morphological analyses for Litoria ewingii, L. calliscelis and sibilus sp. nov. Measurements are presented as the mean±SD and range.
CharacterLitoria ewingii females malesLitoria calliscelis females malesLitoria sibilis sp. nov. females malesSVL37.4±4.431.4±2.134.1±4.931.5±2.736.6±4.731.5±2.628.1–44.828.5–35.527.8–40.327.4–33.727.9–42.725.1–34.5Fin3DW1.3±0.41.0±0.21.6±0.41.1±0.11.4±0.41.1±0.20.9–2.20.7–1.21.2–2.21.0–1.31.0–2.00.7–1.4Fin3W0.8±0.20.6±0.10.8±0.10.7±0.11.0±0.20.7±0.20.5–1.20.4–0.80.6–0.90.6–0.80.7–1.20.5–1.0Toe4DW1.2±0.30.9±0.21.4±0.41.0±0.21.4±0.41.0±0.20.7–1.90.5–1.40.9–2.00.8–1.10.8–1.90.6–1.4AL17.8±2.414.9±1.216.7±2.915.1±1.318.3±2.814.7±1.513.5–22.113.4–17.212.4–19.513.2–16.412.9–21.011.3–16.4DFE6.2±0.55.4±0.46.5±1.05.7±0.56.5±1.05.5±0.45.0–7.14.9–6.35.7–8.05.0–6.14.6–7.44.4–5.9EN2.7±0.42.4±0.22.8±0.42.3±0.32.9±0.42.5±0.22.1–3.42.1–2.82.2–3.21.9–2.62.1–3.52.3–3.1ED3.4±0.33.0±0.43.8±0.63.2±0.33.8±0.43.4±0.32.6–3.72.3–3.73.0–4.72.8–3.53.1–4.53.0–4.1THL18.1±2.815.5±1.316.1±2.815.5±1.017.8±2.514.8±1.213.3–22.813.5–17.612.1–19.714.4–16.912.9–21.112.4–16.9FOL26.6±3.722.7±1.925.1±4.322.6±2.027.1±4.422.2±2.320.2–33.119.6–25.919.0–30.219.5–24.419.0–31.716.9–24.5HDD4.7±0.73.8±0.54.7±0.74.0±0.44.9±0.74.0±0.43.3–6.12.8–4.53.7–5.43.4–4.43.8–6.23.5–4.9HL12.6±1.611.1±2.013.9±2.312.6±0.915.2±1.912.8±0.910.3–15.89.0–14.810.7–16.211.1–13.411.8–17.510.9–13.9HW11.0±1.19.6±0.611.3±2.49.9±0.611.6±1.59.8±0.79.1–12.38.6–10.78.3–14.69.2–10.98.5–13.17.9–10.6IMT1.3±0.21.1±0.21.3±0.41.5±0.21.2±0.31.0±0.21.0–1.90.7–1.40.8–1.80.9–1.40.9–1.60.7–1.3IND2.5±0.32.4±0.22.6±0.32.3±0.12.6±0.32.3±0.12.3–3.42.1–2.92.3–2.82.2–2.52.2–3.22.0–2.6IOD3.6±0.33.1±0.43.6±0.33.5±0.23.7±0.43.3±0.32.9–4.02.4–3.63.2–4.13.2–3.63.1–4.32.8–3.7LAL7.9±1.16.8±0.57.5±0.76.9±0.58.3±1.56.9±0.65.9–10.05.6–7.76.3–8.26.3–7.45.4–9.95.4–7.6HAL10.5±1.58.9±0.710.3±1.98.9±0.811.0±1.88.8±1.07.4–13.07.9–10.27.9–12.57.9–9.77.7–12.76.6–10.0NS2.3±0.31.9±0.22.4±0.52.2±0.12.3±0.42.2±0.21.6–2.71.5–2.21.6–3.02.0–2.42.0–2.91.8–2.6FL16.3±2.413.8±1.215.3±2.713.8±1.516.2±2.612.9±1.212.2–20.411.9–16.311.8–18.211.6–15.311.2–19.29.9–14.1SL4.9±0.54.3±0.25.0±0.44.6±0.25.2±0.74.5±0.34.1–5.73.8–4.74.3–5.54.5–4.83.7–5.94.0–5.0TL18.5±2.615.6±1.217.5±3.015.9±1.119.3±2.715.8±1.113.9–23.114.0–18.313.3–20.514.4–17.214.4–22.913.4–17.4UAL6.5±0.65.4±0.95.9±1.05.8±0.66.7±1.45.6±0.75.8–7.74.5–7.45.2–7.35.0–6.53.8–8.34.4–6.9
description: Published as part of Parkin, Tom, Rowley, Jodi J. L., Elliott-Tate, Jessica, Mahony, Michael J., Sumner, Joanna, Melville, Jane & Donnellan, Stephen C., 2024, Systematic assessment of the brown tree frog (Anura: Pelodryadidae: Litoria ewingii) reveals two endemic species in South Australia, pp. 22 in Zootaxa 5406 (1) on page 22, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5406.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/10610157
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144956
title: TABLE 7 in Systematic assessment of the brown tree frog (Anura: Pelodryadidae: Litoria ewingii) reveals two endemic species in South Australia

description: TABLE 7. Summary of acoustic variation in advertisement call parameters for Litoria ewingii, L. calliscelis and L. sibilus sp. nov. Measurements are presented as the range and the mean.
Call parameterL. ewingiiL. calliscelisL. sibilus sp. nov.Number of calls (n)219596Number of locations165494Call duration (s)1.053–6.6571.571–5.6631.479–2.3362.4213.3471.783Note duration (s)0.103–0.4760.086–0.2330.112–0.2790.2230.160.166Dominant frequency (Hz)1817–31672063–28092156–2541248524442451Notes / call4–227–328–119169Pulses / note10–5710–4215–46241926Note rate (notes/s)1.437–6.3472.719–7.6172.997–6.453.2714.5494.823Pulse rate (Pulses/s)33.59–203.7543.02–192.6898.91–175.17106.35112.18147.04Frequency patternStableStableUp and downNote shapeWedgeOtherTentLongest noteBeginningEndEndShortest noteOtherBeginningBeginning
description: Published as part of Parkin, Tom, Rowley, Jodi J. L., Elliott-Tate, Jessica, Mahony, Michael J., Sumner, Joanna, Melville, Jane & Donnellan, Stephen C., 2024, Systematic assessment of the brown tree frog (Anura: Pelodryadidae: Litoria ewingii) reveals two endemic species in South Australia, pp. 24 in Zootaxa 5406 (1) on page 24, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5406.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/10610157
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144957
title: TABLE 7 in Systematic assessment of the brown tree frog (Anura: Pelodryadidae: Litoria ewingii) reveals two endemic species in South Australia

description: TABLE 7. Summary of acoustic variation in advertisement call parameters for Litoria ewingii, L. calliscelis and L. sibilus sp. nov. Measurements are presented as the range and the mean.
Call parameterL. ewingiiL. calliscelisL. sibilus sp. nov.Number of calls (n)219596Number of locations165494Call duration (s)1.053–6.6571.571–5.6631.479–2.3362.4213.3471.783Note duration (s)0.103–0.4760.086–0.2330.112–0.2790.2230.160.166Dominant frequency (Hz)1817–31672063–28092156–2541248524442451Notes / call4–227–328–119169Pulses / note10–5710–4215–46241926Note rate (notes/s)1.437–6.3472.719–7.6172.997–6.453.2714.5494.823Pulse rate (Pulses/s)33.59–203.7543.02–192.6898.91–175.17106.35112.18147.04Frequency patternStableStableUp and downNote shapeWedgeOtherTentLongest noteBeginningEndEndShortest noteOtherBeginningBeginning
description: Published as part of Parkin, Tom, Rowley, Jodi J. L., Elliott-Tate, Jessica, Mahony, Michael J., Sumner, Joanna, Melville, Jane & Donnellan, Stephen C., 2024, Systematic assessment of the brown tree frog (Anura: Pelodryadidae: Litoria ewingii) reveals two endemic species in South Australia, pp. 24 in Zootaxa 5406 (1) on page 24, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5406.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/10610157
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144959
title: TABLE 8 in Systematic assessment of the brown tree frog (Anura: Pelodryadidae: Litoria ewingii) reveals two endemic species in South Australia

description: TABLE 8. Diagnoses for the three species of the Litoria ewingii Group redescribed or described.
CharacterLitoria ewingiiLitoria calliscelisL. sibilus sp. nov.Adult body sizemales 28–35 mm; females 28–45 mmmales 27–34 mm; females 28–45 mmmales 25–34 mm; females 28–43 mmBuildModerately robustModerately robustModerately robustFinger and toe pad sizePads wider than fingers (mean Fin3W/Fin3DW = 0.6) and toes (mean Toe4W/Toe4DW = 0.7)Pads wider than fingers (mean Fin3W/Fin3DW = 0.6) and toes (mean Toe4W/ Toe4DW = 0.7)Pads wider than fingers (mean Fin3W/Fin3DW = 0.6) and toes (mean Toe4W/Toe4DW = 0.7)Extent of webbingWebbing vestigial on the hands, relatively well-developed on the feet (typically extending from 1st–halfway between 1st and 2nd subarticular tubercle on the 4th toe, rarely extending to the 2nd)Webbing vestigial on the hands, relatively welldeveloped on the feet (extending to the 1st subarticular tubercle on the 4th toe)Webbing vestigial on the hands but relatively well-developed on the feet (extending to the 1st subarticular tubercle on the 4th toe)Posterior thigh patterningPosterior edge of thigh orangeyellow and usually plain, unpatterned (n=27/32), but sometimes with scattered dark spots, flecks or lines (n=5/32)Posterior edge of thigh orange-yellow and usually patterned with dark spots or blotches (n=10/11), occasionally plain (n=1/11)Posterior edge of thigh orangepink, usually patterned with dark spots and blotches (n= 26/27), occasionally plain (n=1/27),Inguinal patterningDark spots in the inguinal region usually absent (n=29/33), although occasionally present (n=4/33)Usually a single dark spot present in the inguinal region, most often at the junction of the thigh and body (n=7/11), sometimes 2–3 spots (n=1/11) or plain (n=3/11)Dark spots or blotches in inguinal region usually absent (n=23/27), sometimes a single spot may be present at the junction of the thigh and body (n=4/27),Number of sites with apomorphicnucleotide states in the ND4 gene (Table 4)81015
description: Published as part of Parkin, Tom, Rowley, Jodi J. L., Elliott-Tate, Jessica, Mahony, Michael J., Sumner, Joanna, Melville, Jane & Donnellan, Stephen C., 2024, Systematic assessment of the brown tree frog (Anura: Pelodryadidae: Litoria ewingii) reveals two endemic species in South Australia, pp. 27 in Zootaxa 5406 (1) on page 27, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5406.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/10610157
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144958
title: TABLE 8 in Systematic assessment of the brown tree frog (Anura: Pelodryadidae: Litoria ewingii) reveals two endemic species in South Australia

description: TABLE 8. Diagnoses for the three species of the Litoria ewingii Group redescribed or described.
CharacterLitoria ewingiiLitoria calliscelisL. sibilus sp. nov.Adult body sizemales 28–35 mm; females 28–45 mmmales 27–34 mm; females 28–45 mmmales 25–34 mm; females 28–43 mmBuildModerately robustModerately robustModerately robustFinger and toe pad sizePads wider than fingers (mean Fin3W/Fin3DW = 0.6) and toes (mean Toe4W/Toe4DW = 0.7)Pads wider than fingers (mean Fin3W/Fin3DW = 0.6) and toes (mean Toe4W/ Toe4DW = 0.7)Pads wider than fingers (mean Fin3W/Fin3DW = 0.6) and toes (mean Toe4W/Toe4DW = 0.7)Extent of webbingWebbing vestigial on the hands, relatively well-developed on the feet (typically extending from 1st–halfway between 1st and 2nd subarticular tubercle on the 4th toe, rarely extending to the 2nd)Webbing vestigial on the hands, relatively welldeveloped on the feet (extending to the 1st subarticular tubercle on the 4th toe)Webbing vestigial on the hands but relatively well-developed on the feet (extending to the 1st subarticular tubercle on the 4th toe)Posterior thigh patterningPosterior edge of thigh orangeyellow and usually plain, unpatterned (n=27/32), but sometimes with scattered dark spots, flecks or lines (n=5/32)Posterior edge of thigh orange-yellow and usually patterned with dark spots or blotches (n=10/11), occasionally plain (n=1/11)Posterior edge of thigh orangepink, usually patterned with dark spots and blotches (n= 26/27), occasionally plain (n=1/27),Inguinal patterningDark spots in the inguinal region usually absent (n=29/33), although occasionally present (n=4/33)Usually a single dark spot present in the inguinal region, most often at the junction of the thigh and body (n=7/11), sometimes 2–3 spots (n=1/11) or plain (n=3/11)Dark spots or blotches in inguinal region usually absent (n=23/27), sometimes a single spot may be present at the junction of the thigh and body (n=4/27),Number of sites with apomorphicnucleotide states in the ND4 gene (Table 4)81015
description: Published as part of Parkin, Tom, Rowley, Jodi J. L., Elliott-Tate, Jessica, Mahony, Michael J., Sumner, Joanna, Melville, Jane & Donnellan, Stephen C., 2024, Systematic assessment of the brown tree frog (Anura: Pelodryadidae: Litoria ewingii) reveals two endemic species in South Australia, pp. 27 in Zootaxa 5406 (1) on page 27, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5406.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/10610157
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144960
title: Table 1 in Living together in dead coral rocks: macrosymbiotic communities associated with Bonellia echiuran worms (Annelida: Thalassematidae: Bonelliinae), involving new commensal bivalve and amphipod species

description: Table 1. Average and maximum numbers of macrosymbionts per host burrow and burrow occupation rates (%) (i.e. the number of burrows with symbionts per the total number of the burrows examined)
Basterotia bonelliphilaLeucothoe bonelliaeOxydromus fauveliOverallAverage number per host burrow ± SE0.40 ± 0.220.40 ± 0.130.15 ± 0.080.95 ± 0.44Maximum number per host burrow3215Burrow occupation rate (%)15.035.015.050.0
description: Published as part of Goto, Ryutaro, Hirabayashi, Isao, Seike, Koji, Yamashita, Momo & Shimomura, Michitaka, 2024, Living together in dead coral rocks: macrosymbiotic communities associated with Bonellia echiuran worms (Annelida: Thalassematidae: Bonelliinae), involving new commensal bivalve and amphipod species, pp. 919 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 200 (4) on page 919, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad103, http://zenodo.org/record/11240746
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144961
title: Table 1 in Living together in dead coral rocks: macrosymbiotic communities associated with Bonellia echiuran worms (Annelida: Thalassematidae: Bonelliinae), involving new commensal bivalve and amphipod species

description: Table 1. Average and maximum numbers of macrosymbionts per host burrow and burrow occupation rates (%) (i.e. the number of burrows with symbionts per the total number of the burrows examined)
Basterotia bonelliphilaLeucothoe bonelliaeOxydromus fauveliOverallAverage number per host burrow ± SE0.40 ± 0.220.40 ± 0.130.15 ± 0.080.95 ± 0.44Maximum number per host burrow3215Burrow occupation rate (%)15.035.015.050.0
description: Published as part of Goto, Ryutaro, Hirabayashi, Isao, Seike, Koji, Yamashita, Momo & Shimomura, Michitaka, 2024, Living together in dead coral rocks: macrosymbiotic communities associated with Bonellia echiuran worms (Annelida: Thalassematidae: Bonelliinae), involving new commensal bivalve and amphipod species, pp. 919 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 200 (4) on page 919, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad103, http://zenodo.org/record/11240746
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144962
title: Table 1 in A new polyphysacean alga from the Miocene of Romania and its biomineralization

description: Table 1. Main biometrical parameters (in mm) of Acetabularia moldavica sp. nov.; gametangium (cyst) diameter with mineralized layer included.
Specimen numberCap diameterFertile rayGametangium (cyst)MP-UAIC 8228/outerinnernumber in a capdistal diameterlengthdiameternumber in a rayPD.1/13.150.18110.681.270.3015PD.1/26.83201.003.170.3630PD.1/34.460.23170.751.920.3118PD.1/63.830.29150.721.840.3016PD.3/85.84200.952.490.2730PD.1/105.30150.952.420.2735PD.1/125.570.24180.782.420.3328PD.2/145.92240.872.830.2635PD.1/152.77100.691.320.3314PD.1/164.100.31150.671.650.3020PD.2/172.840.18120.541.200.3315PD.2/196.140.38200.632.330.3828PD.3/253.29130.691.380.3517Min2.770.18100.541.200.2614Max6.830.38241.003.170.3835Average4.620.2616.150.762.020.3123.15Standard deviation1.3352780.0674913.9777490.1340140.6157780.0349987.664565Number of specimens1371313131313
description: Published as part of Barattolo, Filippo, Ionesi, Viorel & Ţibuleac, Paul, 2019, A new polyphysacean alga from the Miocene of Romania and its biomineralization, pp. 90 in Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 64 (1) on page 90, DOI: 10.4202/app.00537.2018, http://zenodo.org/record/10626616
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144963
title: Table 1 in A new polyphysacean alga from the Miocene of Romania and its biomineralization

description: Table 1. Main biometrical parameters (in mm) of Acetabularia moldavica sp. nov.; gametangium (cyst) diameter with mineralized layer included.
Specimen numberCap diameterFertile rayGametangium (cyst)MP-UAIC 8228/outerinnernumber in a capdistal diameterlengthdiameternumber in a rayPD.1/13.150.18110.681.270.3015PD.1/26.83201.003.170.3630PD.1/34.460.23170.751.920.3118PD.1/63.830.29150.721.840.3016PD.3/85.84200.952.490.2730PD.1/105.30150.952.420.2735PD.1/125.570.24180.782.420.3328PD.2/145.92240.872.830.2635PD.1/152.77100.691.320.3314PD.1/164.100.31150.671.650.3020PD.2/172.840.18120.541.200.3315PD.2/196.140.38200.632.330.3828PD.3/253.29130.691.380.3517Min2.770.18100.541.200.2614Max6.830.38241.003.170.3835Average4.620.2616.150.762.020.3123.15Standard deviation1.3352780.0674913.9777490.1340140.6157780.0349987.664565Number of specimens1371313131313
description: Published as part of Barattolo, Filippo, Ionesi, Viorel & Ţibuleac, Paul, 2019, A new polyphysacean alga from the Miocene of Romania and its biomineralization, pp. 90 in Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 64 (1) on page 90, DOI: 10.4202/app.00537.2018, http://zenodo.org/record/10626616
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144964
title: TABLE 1 in Maguirellaria (Caryophyllaceae), a new genus from Dominican Republic

description: TABLE 1. Morphological comparison between Maguirellaria (M. howardii and M. minutifolia) and Triplateia.
MaguirellariaTriplateiaStem pubescenceglabrous to glandularglabrous to sparsely pubescentLeavespetioled (the basal and middle ones)sessilePadicels: position and length (cm)reflexed, 1.0–2.5 cm longerect, 2–10 mmSepals: veins and size (mm)3-veined, 2–3 × 1.7–1.8 mm1-veined, 1.0–2.2 × 0.5–1.2Petal apexapex bifidapex obtuse or roundedPetal length vs. sepalsclearly longer than the sepalsas long as or slightly longer than the sepalsSeed diameter (mm)0.8–1.31.5–2.0
description: Published as part of Iamonico, Duilio, 2023, Maguirellaria (Caryophyllaceae), a new genus from Dominican Republic, pp. 239 in Phytotaxa 598 (3) on page 239, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.598.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/7969982
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144965
title: TABLE 1 in Maguirellaria (Caryophyllaceae), a new genus from Dominican Republic

description: TABLE 1. Morphological comparison between Maguirellaria (M. howardii and M. minutifolia) and Triplateia.
MaguirellariaTriplateiaStem pubescenceglabrous to glandularglabrous to sparsely pubescentLeavespetioled (the basal and middle ones)sessilePadicels: position and length (cm)reflexed, 1.0–2.5 cm longerect, 2–10 mmSepals: veins and size (mm)3-veined, 2–3 × 1.7–1.8 mm1-veined, 1.0–2.2 × 0.5–1.2Petal apexapex bifidapex obtuse or roundedPetal length vs. sepalsclearly longer than the sepalsas long as or slightly longer than the sepalsSeed diameter (mm)0.8–1.31.5–2.0
description: Published as part of Iamonico, Duilio, 2023, Maguirellaria (Caryophyllaceae), a new genus from Dominican Republic, pp. 239 in Phytotaxa 598 (3) on page 239, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.598.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/7969982
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144966
title: TABLE 1 in Three new species of the genus Pseudachorutella Stach, 1949 (Collembola, Neanuridae) from Russia

description: TABLE 1. Main diagnostic characters of the Palaearctic species of the genus Pseudachorutella Stach, 1949 *.
SpeciesAnt. IVLabrumLabiumMandibular teethMaxillaDorsal chaetotaxySetae on each side of VTInner tooth on UnguisDorsal sensillaVentral «file»Medial pair of prelabral setaeEdgeSensorial organiteslength/ distance between setae a1 and m1Seta d0 on headSetae on each side of Th. ISetae a2 on Th.IIDe setae on Th. II–IIIDL setae De setae on on Abd. Th. I–III II–IIIm setae on Abd. IVSetae p2 on Abd. Vasigillata8few slightly modified sensilla+ogival+2.52styliform with 3–4 tiny denticles at apex+4+5+S2+S4+S1(2)–41remyi6?????8styliform?????????3–4balcanica8**+?non ogival?2.53?????2+S???41bescidica8++non ogival+, small3.53–4styliform+–6–8+6(7)+S4(5)+S7–8+S4–5+3–51ellisi8+–ogival–4.5–5.02with a hook at apex–3+4–5+S2+S?1+41circassiana sp. nov.8+, slightly modified–ogival+–, very small3.9–4.62with a hook at apex–3+(4)5+S2+S4+S1(2)–41plurichaetosa sp. nov.8++ogival–4.5–4.85with two apical hooks–4–5+5–6+S2+S6+S5–8–4–61stebaevae sp. nov.8++ogival+, small5.0–5.56with two apical hooks+–4–5+7–9+S3+S7–10+S6–8+4(5)1
* One more species, P. clavata, is not included in the table, since it is almost impossible to judge its real morphology due to the lack of modern descriptions. It is distinguished from all other species of the genus by the presence of a single clavate hair on each tibiotarsus–– Tibien mit einem Keulenhaar über dem Tarsus (Börner 1901, p. 37) On www.collembola.org it is listed twice––as a possible synonym of P. asigillata based on Gama (1964) and Massoud (1967) and also as a valid species, citing Dányi & Traser (2008).
** the original description of this species (Cassagnau & Peja 1979) indicates the presence of only 6 dorsal sensilla on the Ant. IV (see also Smolis et al. 2023, p. 338). However, according to Deharveng (1981, fig. 2J) the number and position of antennal sensilla in P. balcanica does not differ from that of P. asigillata.
description: Published as part of Babenko, Anatoly & Kuznetsova, Natalia, 2024, Three new species of the genus Pseudachorutella Stach, 1949 (Collembola, Neanuridae) from Russia, pp. 193 in Zootaxa 5447 (2) on page 193, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5447.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/11119462