cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1224344.v1
title: Twitter archive from UX Design Day in Dunedin 31 October 2014 #UXDD

description: This file contains a data set of 913 tweets (890 unique tweets) tagged with @uxdesignday OR #uxdd OR #uxdesignday (case not sensitive) that were published on Twitter between 24 October 2014 03:18:33 and 31 October 2014 20:03:31 GMT. This file was created and shared by Sarah Gallagher (University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand), “as is”, with a Creative Commons- Attribution license (CC-BY) for academic research and educational use. The Tweets contained in this file were collected using Martin Hawksey’s [@mhawksey] TAGS 6.0 http://tags.hawksey.info/ An automatic deduplication has been performed but data may require further refining. Retweets have been retained. The contents of each Tweet are responsibility of the original authors. As noted by Priego [1] “both research and experience show that the Twitter search API isn't 100% reliable. Large tweet volumes affect the search collection process. The API might "over-represent the more central users", not offering "an accurate picture of peripheral activity" (González-Bailón, Sandra, et al. 2012).” Therefore there is no guarantee that this file all Tweets tagged with (@uxdesignday OR #uxdd OR #uxdesignday) during the indicated period. This dataset is shared to encourage open research into scholarly activity on Twitter. If you use or refer to this data in any way please cite using the prefered citation above. Contact: @sarahlibrarina [1] Priego, Ernesto (2014): A #HEFCEmetrics Twitter Archive. figshare. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1196029.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1224338
title: ffsdfsdfsdfsdf

description: dasdasdasd dasdasdsd
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1224334
title: Nature of Expertise Fingerprints - Experiment 4

description: Data from Experiment 4 of Thompson, M. B. & Tangen, J. M. (2014). The nature of expertise in fingerprint matching: Experts can do a lot with a little. PLOS ONE. The demographic information of experts has been removed in order to maintain confidentiality.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1224338.v1
title: ffsdfsdfsdfsdf

description: dasdasdasd dasdasdsd
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1224334.v1
title: Nature of Expertise Fingerprints - Experiment 4

description: Data from Experiment 4 of Thompson, M. B. & Tangen, J. M. (2014). The nature of expertise in fingerprint matching: Experts can do a lot with a little. PLOS ONE. The demographic information of experts has been removed in order to maintain confidentiality.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1224331
title: Nature of Expertise Fingerprints - Experiment 1

description: Data from Experiment 1 of Thompson, M. B. & Tangen, J. M. (2014). The nature of expertise in fingerprint matching: Experts can do a lot with a little. PLOS ONE. The demographic information of experts has been removed in order to maintain confidentiality.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1224332
title: Nature of Expertise Fingerprints - Experiment 2

description: Data from Experiment 2 of Thompson, M. B. & Tangen, J. M. (2014). The nature of expertise in fingerprint matching: Experts can do a lot with a little. PLOS ONE. The demographic information of experts has been removed in order to maintain confidentiality.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1224333
title: Nature of Expertise Fingerprints - Experiment 3

description: Data from Experiment 3 of Thompson, M. B. & Tangen, J. M. (2014). The nature of expertise in fingerprint matching: Experts can do a lot with a little. PLOS ONE. The demographic information of experts has been removed in order to maintain confidentiality.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1224325
title: Ecology lab 4

description: Hypothesis and predictions The density of saplings in a given area is directly proportional to light availability and inversely proportional to the density of adults. In an area where there are more adults, there is more competition and therefore fewer opportunities for growth of new saplings – which would be out-competed by existing adults. This prediction is based on the ecological maxim, “Space Matters”. Furthermore, since light is necessary for photosynthesis to occur for energy purposes, it follows that individuals would be more abundant where this specific resource is more plentiful. In areas where light availability is scarce, saplings would be less likely to proliferate as one or more adult individuals likely outcompete any others, blocking much light availability from being available to others. This can be summed up by the following predictions: Where there is a greater number of competing adult individuals per area measured, there are fewer saplings.More light availability would correlate to a greater sapling density.Less competition (in terms of space) with adult individuals combined with more light availability would correlate to an even greater sapling density. Methods The area of interest was the Danby woodlot. The researchers randomly selected an adult tree in the woodlot and lay transect tapes such that 6 meter radii were formed around the adult; the species of the adult was recorded. The number of saplings of the same species as the adult was counted, within a 6 meter radius relative to the adult. For Buckthorn, maximum height for saplings was waist length for a 1.61 meter tall female, and for all other species, maximum sapling height was approximately 2 meters. Then, researchers counted the number of competing adults in the same area. For Buckthorn, minimum height for adults was waist length for a 1.61 meter tall female, and for all other species, minimum adult height was approximately 2 meters. The researchers proceeded to estimate the percentage of light penetration (light availability) by making a quadrat with the index fingers and thumbs – at four locations along the 6 meter radius. The experiment was executed a total of 30 times. Researchers looked to confirm a negative correlation between density of competing adults and sapling density, and a positive correlation between sapling density and light availability.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1224314
title: Highly Cited Documents on Google Scholar (1950-2013)

description: This dataset contains: - A sample of 64,000 highly cited documents published in the period 1950-2013, collected from Google Scholar on the 28th of May, 2014. - List of clean references of the top 1% most cited documents in Google Scholar (640 documents) - Study case: different versions (detected and undetected by Google Scholar) for the work "A Mathematical Theory of Communication", by Claude Shannon.- Frequency table: number of highly-cited documents in our sample published in WoS-covered journals
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1224331.v1
title: Nature of Expertise Fingerprints - Experiment 1

description: Data from Experiment 1 of Thompson, M. B. & Tangen, J. M. (2014). The nature of expertise in fingerprint matching: Experts can do a lot with a little. PLOS ONE. The demographic information of experts has been removed in order to maintain confidentiality.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1224310
title: Inter- and intra-specific diversity of Cuban <i>Pinguicula</i> (Lentibulariaceae) based on morphometric analyses and its relation with geographical distribution

description: <b><i>Background:</i></b> Phenotypic variations have been observed in populations of west Cuban <i>Pinguicula</i> species. Such populations occur in patches under different ecological conditions associated with specialised habitats and separated by geographical and ecological barriers, which can lead to morphological differentiation.<b><i>Aims:</i></b> To analyse morphological diversity among species and populations of Cuban <i>Pinguicula</i>; and to test if morphological variability is associated with geographical distribution and distance between populations.<b><i>Methods:</i></b> We sampled a total of eight populations of <i>P. albida</i>, <i>P. cubensis</i> and <i>P. filifolia</i> and tested for morphometric differences among them by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) based on 31 quantitative traits. We also assessed the geographical isolation with respect to morphological distance.<b><i>Results:</i></b> The studied species showed high morphological variability at both species and population level. Reproductive characteristics appeared to be more promissory than vegetative ones in distinguishing geographical groups since they clearly defined populations; nevertheless a strong component of individual variation was observed. According to the distance analysis, such morphological variations were correlated with fragmented populations and isolation and allowed the differentiation of two morphotypes of <i>P. albida</i> and two of <i>P. filifolia</i>.<b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> We conclude that high phenotypic variation of the analysed species is related to geographical and ecological isolation which have led to the differentiation of morphotypes within species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1224332.v1
title: Nature of Expertise Fingerprints - Experiment 2

description: Data from Experiment 2 of Thompson, M. B. & Tangen, J. M. (2014). The nature of expertise in fingerprint matching: Experts can do a lot with a little. PLOS ONE. The demographic information of experts has been removed in order to maintain confidentiality.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1224308
title: Impact on plant communities by white-tailed deer in Mississippi, USA

description: <b><i>Background:</i></b> The abundance of white-tailed deer (<i>Odocoileus virginianus</i>) in the eastern United States has escalated during the twentieth century, potentially impacting plant communities.<b><i>Methods:</i></b> We measured understorey plant cover and biomass five years after excluding deer from mature forests of three ecological regions in Mississippi, USA. We extended the significance of <i>P</i> values to 0.10 to detect developing impacts.<b><i>Results:</i></b> Deer impacts were limited and varied by ecological region. We recorded 151 species in cover transects. Consistent exclosure treatment effects were detected in two regions where there was greater cover of two deer forages and less cover of three non-forages. Species richness was greater in exclosures in one region, but otherwise species richness and diversity indices did not differ. We recorded 127 species in biomass quadrats. Exclosure treatment effects on biomass were inconsistent. Out of five species with significant differences, three had more biomass in controls, including two deer forages. Except for greater total biomass in controls of one region, there were no differences by growth form or total vegetation for canopy coverage or biomass. Ordination of community canopy cover demonstrated similarity of paired exclosure and controls.<b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Exclosure treatment effects on canopy cover and species richness in two regions indicated limited negative impacts from deer foraging. A time frame of more than five years may be required for exclusion to allow recovery of vegetation, even with relatively open canopies and a long growing season.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1224325.v1
title: Ecology lab 4

description: Hypothesis and predictions The density of saplings in a given area is directly proportional to light availability and inversely proportional to the density of adults. In an area where there are more adults, there is more competition and therefore fewer opportunities for growth of new saplings – which would be out-competed by existing adults. This prediction is based on the ecological maxim, “Space Matters”. Furthermore, since light is necessary for photosynthesis to occur for energy purposes, it follows that individuals would be more abundant where this specific resource is more plentiful. In areas where light availability is scarce, saplings would be less likely to proliferate as one or more adult individuals likely outcompete any others, blocking much light availability from being available to others. This can be summed up by the following predictions: Where there is a greater number of competing adult individuals per area measured, there are fewer saplings.More light availability would correlate to a greater sapling density.Less competition (in terms of space) with adult individuals combined with more light availability would correlate to an even greater sapling density. Methods The area of interest was the Danby woodlot. The researchers randomly selected an adult tree in the woodlot and lay transect tapes such that 6 meter radii were formed around the adult; the species of the adult was recorded. The number of saplings of the same species as the adult was counted, within a 6 meter radius relative to the adult. For Buckthorn, maximum height for saplings was waist length for a 1.61 meter tall female, and for all other species, maximum sapling height was approximately 2 meters. Then, researchers counted the number of competing adults in the same area. For Buckthorn, minimum height for adults was waist length for a 1.61 meter tall female, and for all other species, minimum adult height was approximately 2 meters. The researchers proceeded to estimate the percentage of light penetration (light availability) by making a quadrat with the index fingers and thumbs – at four locations along the 6 meter radius. The experiment was executed a total of 30 times. Researchers looked to confirm a negative correlation between density of competing adults and sapling density, and a positive correlation between sapling density and light availability.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1224307
title: Experimental Design: Attractant for Insects (draft)

description: This experiment was designed to examine which of the treatments were more attractant to insects with respect the weather conditions at York University grassland. There were 3 sets; each had all four treatments (water, sugar, salt, and perfume). The stations were placed randomly, where the first set was placed where the T.A. stopped at. The second station was placed 8 meters to the right of the first station and the third was 8 meters to the right of the second station. All the treatments were dissolved with water at 5% concentration, but the perfume was 10 buffs on the grass bundle. Each grass bundle treatment was placed on white sheet. The stations were about 2 meter square with additional 50cm of human free zoon to eliminate disturbance. Insects’ abundance was collected every 20 minutes from each set for every treatment allowing the researchers to obtain 3 trials on 20 minutes intervals. Thus, in 120 minutes, there were 18 replicated trials collected for each treatment. The same experiment was conducted on another day; the only change was that the sheets of paper were changed from white to brown and the weather condition. On day “1” there were showers, gentle breeze (7-9 mph), with 12°C temperature. Further, day “2” was sunny and the soil was lightly wet with temperature 15°C. Day “1” was 15/10/2014 while day “2” was on 22/10/2014 and the experiments timing was 3:00pm-4:45pm for both days. The limitation for this experiment was the used paper sheets, they may alternate the readings since the white or brown color may alternate in insects’ attention. Thus, that may violate the data collection from the both days. Further, the change in weather condition between day “1” and day “2” as rain may reduce the number of flying insects and heat may alternate insects’ behaviour from looking for food to looking for water. Thus, to overcome those limitations, the weather conditions need to be controlled (i.e. in lab experiment). Further, the experiment needs to have a uniform in terms of the color of the paper sheets used.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1224308.v2
title: Impact on plant communities by white-tailed deer in Mississippi, USA

description: <b><i>Background:</i></b> The abundance of white-tailed deer (<i>Odocoileus virginianus</i>) in the eastern United States has escalated during the twentieth century, potentially impacting plant communities.<b><i>Methods:</i></b> We measured understorey plant cover and biomass five years after excluding deer from mature forests of three ecological regions in Mississippi, USA. We extended the significance of <i>P</i> values to 0.10 to detect developing impacts.<b><i>Results:</i></b> Deer impacts were limited and varied by ecological region. We recorded 151 species in cover transects. Consistent exclosure treatment effects were detected in two regions where there was greater cover of two deer forages and less cover of three non-forages. Species richness was greater in exclosures in one region, but otherwise species richness and diversity indices did not differ. We recorded 127 species in biomass quadrats. Exclosure treatment effects on biomass were inconsistent. Out of five species with significant differences, three had more biomass in controls, including two deer forages. Except for greater total biomass in controls of one region, there were no differences by growth form or total vegetation for canopy coverage or biomass. Ordination of community canopy cover demonstrated similarity of paired exclosure and controls.<b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Exclosure treatment effects on canopy cover and species richness in two regions indicated limited negative impacts from deer foraging. A time frame of more than five years may be required for exclusion to allow recovery of vegetation, even with relatively open canopies and a long growing season.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1224310.v1
title: Inter- and intra-specific diversity of Cuban <i>Pinguicula</i> (Lentibulariaceae) based on morphometric analyses and its relation with geographical distribution

description: <b><i>Background:</i></b> Phenotypic variations have been observed in populations of west Cuban <i>Pinguicula</i> species. Such populations occur in patches under different ecological conditions associated with specialised habitats and separated by geographical and ecological barriers, which can lead to morphological differentiation.<b><i>Aims:</i></b> To analyse morphological diversity among species and populations of Cuban <i>Pinguicula</i>; and to test if morphological variability is associated with geographical distribution and distance between populations.<b><i>Methods:</i></b> We sampled a total of eight populations of <i>P. albida</i>, <i>P. cubensis</i> and <i>P. filifolia</i> and tested for morphometric differences among them by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) based on 31 quantitative traits. We also assessed the geographical isolation with respect to morphological distance.<b><i>Results:</i></b> The studied species showed high morphological variability at both species and population level. Reproductive characteristics appeared to be more promissory than vegetative ones in distinguishing geographical groups since they clearly defined populations; nevertheless a strong component of individual variation was observed. According to the distance analysis, such morphological variations were correlated with fragmented populations and isolation and allowed the differentiation of two morphotypes of <i>P. albida</i> and two of <i>P. filifolia</i>.<b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> We conclude that high phenotypic variation of the analysed species is related to geographical and ecological isolation which have led to the differentiation of morphotypes within species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1224308.v1
title: Impact on plant communities by white-tailed deer in Mississippi, USA

description: <b><i>Background:</i></b> The abundance of white-tailed deer (<i>Odocoileus virginianus</i>) in the eastern United States has escalated during the twentieth century, potentially impacting plant communities.<b><i>Methods:</i></b> We measured understorey plant cover and biomass five years after excluding deer from mature forests of three ecological regions in Mississippi, USA. We extended the significance of <i>P</i> values to 0.10 to detect developing impacts.<b><i>Results:</i></b> Deer impacts were limited and varied by ecological region. We recorded 151 species in cover transects. Consistent exclosure treatment effects were detected in two regions where there was greater cover of two deer forages and less cover of three non-forages. Species richness was greater in exclosures in one region, but otherwise species richness and diversity indices did not differ. We recorded 127 species in biomass quadrats. Exclosure treatment effects on biomass were inconsistent. Out of five species with significant differences, three had more biomass in controls, including two deer forages. Except for greater total biomass in controls of one region, there were no differences by growth form or total vegetation for canopy coverage or biomass. Ordination of community canopy cover demonstrated similarity of paired exclosure and controls.<b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Exclosure treatment effects on canopy cover and species richness in two regions indicated limited negative impacts from deer foraging. A time frame of more than five years may be required for exclusion to allow recovery of vegetation, even with relatively open canopies and a long growing season.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1224307.v4
title: Experimental Design: Attractant for Insects (draft)

description: This experiment was designed to examine which of the treatments were more attractant to insects with respect the weather conditions at York University grassland. There were 3 sets; each had all four treatments (water, sugar, salt, and perfume). The stations were placed randomly, where the first set was placed where the T.A. stopped at. The second station was placed 8 meters to the right of the first station and the third was 8 meters to the right of the second station. All the treatments were dissolved with water at 5% concentration, but the perfume was 10 buffs on the grass bundle. Each grass bundle treatment was placed on white sheet. The stations were about 2 meter square with additional 50cm of human free zoon to eliminate disturbance. Insects’ abundance was collected every 20 minutes from each set for every treatment allowing the researchers to obtain 3 trials on 20 minutes intervals. Thus, in 120 minutes, there were 18 replicated trials collected for each treatment. The same experiment was conducted on another day; the only change was that the sheets of paper were changed from white to brown and the weather condition. On day “1” there were showers, gentle breeze (7-9 mph), with 12°C temperature. Further, day “2” was sunny and the soil was lightly wet with temperature 15°C. Day “1” was 15/10/2014 while day “2” was on 22/10/2014 and the experiments timing was 3:00pm-4:45pm for both days. The limitation for this experiment was the used paper sheets, they may alternate the readings since the white or brown color may alternate in insects’ attention. Thus, that may violate the data collection from the both days. Further, the change in weather condition between day “1” and day “2” as rain may reduce the number of flying insects and heat may alternate insects’ behaviour from looking for food to looking for water. Thus, to overcome those limitations, the weather conditions need to be controlled (i.e. in lab experiment). Further, the experiment needs to have a uniform in terms of the color of the paper sheets used.