cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.15468/dn2wbe
title: Correction of collecting number errors in the protologues of sixty-four taxon names from China

description: This dataset contains the digitized treatments in Plazi based on the original journal article Lin, Yun, Bi, Hai-Yan, Sun, Jun, Sun, Qian (2023): Correction of collecting number errors in the protologues of sixty-four taxon names from China. Phytotaxa 598 (4): 271-282, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.598.4.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.598.4.1AbstractRevision and collation of Chinese type specimens from the Harvard University Herbaria and the William and Lynda Steere Herbarium of New York Botanical Garden led to the discovery of errors in the designation of type specimens in the protologues of several taxa names. Following the Article 9.2 of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code, 2018), the typographical errors of collecting number in the protologues of 64 taxa from China were corrected.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730240
title: 3.1. 1 in Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW

description: 3.1. 1 Buzzard Flight Activity
(i) VP(ii) Visible Area (ha)(iii) Watch Time Nov – Sept (hrs)(iv) Watch Time hahr (ii) x (iii)(v) Flying (vi) Flight Time 30-150m Time 30-150m (hrs) per ha/hr (v)/(iv)11413.94867867.20.025 (90s)3.68 x 10-721413.94867867.20.008 (30s)1.23 x 10-731413.94867867.30.033 (120s)4.91 x 10-7Total203601.60.067 (240s)Overall3.27 x 10-7
description: Published as part of Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter & Gundert, Martin, 2013, Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW in null, Constanta County, Romania :European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) on page 1, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730242
title: Table 3.1.2 in Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW

description: Table 3.1.2 Predicted Collision Mortalities for Buzzard
No. of Rotor Transits /YearProbability of CollisionPredicted Mortalities March to JulyNo Avoidance90% Avoidance95% Avoidance98% Avoidance99% Avoidance7.8716.4%1.290.130.060.030.01
description: Published as part of Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter & Gundert, Martin, 2013, Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW in null, Constanta County, Romania :European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) on page 3, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730243
title: Table 3.1.2 in Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW

description: Table 3.1.2 Predicted Collision Mortalities for Buzzard
No. of Rotor Transits /YearProbability of CollisionPredicted Mortalities March to JulyNo Avoidance90% Avoidance95% Avoidance98% Avoidance99% Avoidance7.8716.4%1.290.130.060.030.01
description: Published as part of Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter & Gundert, Martin, 2013, Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW in null, Constanta County, Romania :European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) on page 3, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730244
title: 4.1. 1 in Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW

description: 4.1. 1 Long-legged Buzzard Flight Activity
(i) VP(ii) Visible Area (ha)(iii) Watch Time Nov – Sept (hrs)(iv) Watch Time hahr (ii) x (iii)(v) Flying (vi) Flight Time 30-150m Time 30-150m (hrs) per ha/hr (v)/(iv)11413.94867867.20.029 (105s)4.30 x 10 -721413.94867867.20031413.94867867.20.016 (60s)2.46 x 10 -7Total203601.610.046 (165)Overall2.25 10 -7
description: Published as part of Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter & Gundert, Martin, 2013, Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW in null, Constanta County, Romania :European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) on page 1, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730245
title: 4.1. 1 in Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW

description: 4.1. 1 Long-legged Buzzard Flight Activity
(i) VP(ii) Visible Area (ha)(iii) Watch Time Nov – Sept (hrs)(iv) Watch Time hahr (ii) x (iii)(v) Flying (vi) Flight Time 30-150m Time 30-150m (hrs) per ha/hr (v)/(iv)11413.94867867.20.029 (105s)4.30 x 10 -721413.94867867.20031413.94867867.20.016 (60s)2.46 x 10 -7Total203601.610.046 (165)Overall2.25 10 -7
description: Published as part of Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter & Gundert, Martin, 2013, Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW in null, Constanta County, Romania :European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) on page 1, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730247
title: Table 4.1.2 in Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW

description: Table 4.1.2 Predicted Collision Mortalities for Long-legged Buzzard
No. of Rotor Transits /YearProbability of CollisionPredicted Mortalities March to JulyNo Avoidance90% Avoidance95% Avoidance98% Avoidance99% Avoidance5.4116.72%0.910.090.050.020.01
description: Published as part of Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter & Gundert, Martin, 2013, Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW in null, Constanta County, Romania :European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) on page 3, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18071243
title: Balcony Typologies

description: The research investigates how balconies function as dual architectural elements that integrate façade expression, environmental control, and residential usability in Parisian housing built between 2007 and 2020. The research combines field observation with graphical–morphological analysis and literature review to study 33 projects which resulted in seven balcony subtypes: symmetrical, asymmetrical, box-shaped, double-height, uniform continuous, variable continuous and hybrid systems. The different balcony subtypes show distinct performance characteristics because symmetrical and uniform continuous designs maintain façade unity and uniform shading patterns but asymmetrical and box-shaped and variable designs achieve flexibility through different projection depths and enclosure levels. The design of double-height balconies provides better ventilation and daylight exposure while hybrid systems unite personal design needs with shared architectural values. The research creates an integrated system which demonstrates balcony design interactions with climate control systems and user satisfaction metrics to validate their requirement for climate-friendly residential buildings.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18071244
title: Balcony Typologies

description: The research investigates how balconies function as dual architectural elements that integrate façade expression, environmental control, and residential usability in Parisian housing built between 2007 and 2020. The research combines field observation with graphical–morphological analysis and literature review to study 33 projects which resulted in seven balcony subtypes: symmetrical, asymmetrical, box-shaped, double-height, uniform continuous, variable continuous and hybrid systems. The different balcony subtypes show distinct performance characteristics because symmetrical and uniform continuous designs maintain façade unity and uniform shading patterns but asymmetrical and box-shaped and variable designs achieve flexibility through different projection depths and enclosure levels. The design of double-height balconies provides better ventilation and daylight exposure while hybrid systems unite personal design needs with shared architectural values. The research creates an integrated system which demonstrates balcony design interactions with climate control systems and user satisfaction metrics to validate their requirement for climate-friendly residential buildings.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730246
title: Table 4.1.2 in Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW

description: Table 4.1.2 Predicted Collision Mortalities for Long-legged Buzzard
No. of Rotor Transits /YearProbability of CollisionPredicted Mortalities March to JulyNo Avoidance90% Avoidance95% Avoidance98% Avoidance99% Avoidance5.4116.72%0.910.090.050.020.01
description: Published as part of Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter & Gundert, Martin, 2013, Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW in null, Constanta County, Romania :European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) on page 3, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730248
title: 5.1.1 in Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW

description: 5.1.1 Booted Eagle Flight Activity
(i) VP(ii) Visible Area (ha)(iii) Watch Time Nov – Sept (hrs)(iv) Watch Time hahr (ii) x (iii)(v) Flying Time 30-150m (hrs)(vi) Flight Time 30-150m per ha/hr (v)/(iv)11413.94867867.20021413.94867867.20.0375 (135)5.53 x 10 -731413.94867867.200Total203601.60.0375 (135s)Overall1.84x 10 -7
description: Published as part of Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter & Gundert, Martin, 2013, Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW in null, Constanta County, Romania :European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) on page 215, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730249
title: 5.1.1 in Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW

description: 5.1.1 Booted Eagle Flight Activity
(i) VP(ii) Visible Area (ha)(iii) Watch Time Nov – Sept (hrs)(iv) Watch Time hahr (ii) x (iii)(v) Flying Time 30-150m (hrs)(vi) Flight Time 30-150m per ha/hr (v)/(iv)11413.94867867.20021413.94867867.20.0375 (135)5.53 x 10 -731413.94867867.200Total203601.60.0375 (135s)Overall1.84x 10 -7
description: Published as part of Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter & Gundert, Martin, 2013, Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW in null, Constanta County, Romania :European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) on page 215, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
DOI: 10.15468/dl.w9amps
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 0 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "TaxonKey is Ramphotyphlops braminus",
 "Country is Cameroon",
 "HasCoordinate is true"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 0 records from 0 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0067346-251120083545085/datasets/export for details.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730250
title: Table 5.1.2 in Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW

description: Table 5.1.2 Predicted Collision Mortalities for Booted Eagle
No. of Rotor Transits /YearProbability of CollisionPredicted Mortalities March to JulyNo Avoidance90% Avoidance95% Avoidance98% Avoidance99% Avoidance4.4316.08%0.710.0.080.040.010.01
description: Published as part of Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter & Gundert, Martin, 2013, Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW in null, Constanta County, Romania :European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) on page 3, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730251
title: Table 5.1.2 in Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW

description: Table 5.1.2 Predicted Collision Mortalities for Booted Eagle
No. of Rotor Transits /YearProbability of CollisionPredicted Mortalities March to JulyNo Avoidance90% Avoidance95% Avoidance98% Avoidance99% Avoidance4.4316.08%0.710.0.080.040.010.01
description: Published as part of Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter & Gundert, Martin, 2013, Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW in null, Constanta County, Romania :European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) on page 3, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730252
title: 6.1. 1 in Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW

description: 6.1. 1 Black Kite Flight Activity
(i) VP(ii) Visible(iii) Watch(iv) Watch(v) Flying(vi) FlightArea (ha)Time Nov – Sept (hrs)Time hahr (ii) x (iii)Time 30-150m Time 30-150m (hrs) per ha/hr (v)/(iv)11413.94867867.20.0125 (45s)1.84 x 10-721413.94867867.20031413.94867867.20.0125 (45s)1.84 x 10-7Total203601.60.025 (90s)Overall1.23x 10-7
description: Published as part of Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter & Gundert, Martin, 2013, Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW in null, Constanta County, Romania :European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) on page 1, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730253
title: 6.1. 1 in Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW

description: 6.1. 1 Black Kite Flight Activity
(i) VP(ii) Visible(iii) Watch(iv) Watch(v) Flying(vi) FlightArea (ha)Time Nov – Sept (hrs)Time hahr (ii) x (iii)Time 30-150m Time 30-150m (hrs) per ha/hr (v)/(iv)11413.94867867.20.0125 (45s)1.84 x 10-721413.94867867.20031413.94867867.20.0125 (45s)1.84 x 10-7Total203601.60.025 (90s)Overall1.23x 10-7
description: Published as part of Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter & Gundert, Martin, 2013, Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW in null, Constanta County, Romania :European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) on page 1, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
DOI: 10.15468/dl.ycc8wc
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 0 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "TaxonKey is Ramphotyphlops braminus",
 "Country is Central African Republic",
 "HasCoordinate is true"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 0 records from 0 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0067347-251120083545085/datasets/export for details.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.ajvfr9
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 0 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "TaxonKey is Ramphotyphlops braminus",
 "Country is Egypt",
 "HasCoordinate is true"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 0 records from 0 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0067348-251120083545085/datasets/export for details.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730255
title: Table 6.1.2 in Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW

description: Table 6.1.2 Predicted Collision Mortalities for Black Kite
No. of Rotor Transits /YearProbability of CollisionPredicted Mortalities March to JulyNo Avoidance90% Avoidance95% Avoidance98% Avoidance99% Avoidance3.1415.84%0.500.050.020.010.005
description: Published as part of Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter & Gundert, Martin, 2013, Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW in null, Constanta County, Romania :European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) on page 3, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730254
title: Table 6.1.2 in Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW

description: Table 6.1.2 Predicted Collision Mortalities for Black Kite
No. of Rotor Transits /YearProbability of CollisionPredicted Mortalities March to JulyNo Avoidance90% Avoidance95% Avoidance98% Avoidance99% Avoidance3.1415.84%0.500.050.020.010.005
description: Published as part of Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter & Gundert, Martin, 2013, Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW in null, Constanta County, Romania :European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) on page 3, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730256
title: Table 1 - 1 in Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW

description: Table 1-1 Summary of the birds species observed on Crucea East site and nearby
No.Scientific nameCommon nameEstimates on the number of individualsEstimates on the populations trends During During construction operation1Alauda arvensisSkylark30-100==2Anthus campestrisTawny pipit30-100==3Carduelis carduelisGoldfinch10-30==4Coracias garrulusRoller10-30==5Corvus corone cornixHooded crow30-100==6Corvus frugilegusRook100-300==7Corvus monedulaJackdaw30-100==8Falco tinnunculusCommon kestrel1-10<=9Buteo rufinusLong legged buzzard1-10<=10Buteo buteoBuzzard1-10==11Calandrella brachydactylaShort-toed lark30-100==12Galerida cristataCrested lark10-30==13Hirundo rusticaBarn swallow10-30==14Lanius collurioRed-backed shrike10-30<=15Lanius minorLesser grey shrike10-30<=16Miliaria calandraCorn bunting30-100==17Merops apiasterBee-eater10-30==18Oenanthe oenantheNorthen weatear10-30==19Passer domesticusHouse sparrow30-100==20Passer montanusTree sparrow10-30==21Melanochorypha calandraCalandra lark100-300==22Sturnus vulgarisStarling100-300==23Cuculus canorusCuckoo1-10<=24Glaucidium passeriniumPygmy owl1-10==25Motacilla albaWhite wagtail10-30==26Parus majorGreat tit10-30==27Saxicola rubetraWhinchat30-100==28Ficedula albicollisCollared flycatcher30-100==29Cyrcus pygargusMontagu̍s harrier1-10<=30Phasianus colchicusCommon pheasant10-30<=31Perdix perdixGrey partridge10-30<=32Apus apusCommon swift10-30==33Larus cachinansYellow-legged gull10-30==34Streptopelia decaoctoCollared dove10-30==35Streptopelia turturTurtle dove1-10==36Phylloscopus sp.Warblers10-30==37Parus caeruleusBlue tit1-10==38Turdus merulaCommon blackbird1-10==39Emberiza hortulanaOrtolan bunting30-100==40Upupa epopsHoopoe10-30==41Pica picaMagpie10-30==42Riparia ripariaSand martin30-100==43Dendrocopos syriacusSyrian woodpecker1-10==
description: Published as part of Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter & Gundert, Martin, 2013, Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW in null, Constanta County, Romania :European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) on page 222, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730257
title: Table 1 - 1 in Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW

description: Table 1-1 Summary of the birds species observed on Crucea East site and nearby
No.Scientific nameCommon nameEstimates on the number of individualsEstimates on the populations trends During During construction operation1Alauda arvensisSkylark30-100==2Anthus campestrisTawny pipit30-100==3Carduelis carduelisGoldfinch10-30==4Coracias garrulusRoller10-30==5Corvus corone cornixHooded crow30-100==6Corvus frugilegusRook100-300==7Corvus monedulaJackdaw30-100==8Falco tinnunculusCommon kestrel1-10<=9Buteo rufinusLong legged buzzard1-10<=10Buteo buteoBuzzard1-10==11Calandrella brachydactylaShort-toed lark30-100==12Galerida cristataCrested lark10-30==13Hirundo rusticaBarn swallow10-30==14Lanius collurioRed-backed shrike10-30<=15Lanius minorLesser grey shrike10-30<=16Miliaria calandraCorn bunting30-100==17Merops apiasterBee-eater10-30==18Oenanthe oenantheNorthen weatear10-30==19Passer domesticusHouse sparrow30-100==20Passer montanusTree sparrow10-30==21Melanochorypha calandraCalandra lark100-300==22Sturnus vulgarisStarling100-300==23Cuculus canorusCuckoo1-10<=24Glaucidium passeriniumPygmy owl1-10==25Motacilla albaWhite wagtail10-30==26Parus majorGreat tit10-30==27Saxicola rubetraWhinchat30-100==28Ficedula albicollisCollared flycatcher30-100==29Cyrcus pygargusMontagu̍s harrier1-10<=30Phasianus colchicusCommon pheasant10-30<=31Perdix perdixGrey partridge10-30<=32Apus apusCommon swift10-30==33Larus cachinansYellow-legged gull10-30==34Streptopelia decaoctoCollared dove10-30==35Streptopelia turturTurtle dove1-10==36Phylloscopus sp.Warblers10-30==37Parus caeruleusBlue tit1-10==38Turdus merulaCommon blackbird1-10==39Emberiza hortulanaOrtolan bunting30-100==40Upupa epopsHoopoe10-30==41Pica picaMagpie10-30==42Riparia ripariaSand martin30-100==43Dendrocopos syriacusSyrian woodpecker1-10==
description: Published as part of Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter & Gundert, Martin, 2013, Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW in null, Constanta County, Romania :European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) on page 222, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730258
title: Table 1 - 2 in Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW

description: Table 1-2 Summary of the birds species observed on Raggio Verde wind farm site and nearby
No.Scientific nameCommon name1Alauda arvensisSkylark2Anthus campestrisTawny pipit3Buteo buteoBuzzard4Buteo rufinusLong legged buzzard5Circus aeruginosusWestern Marsh-harrier6Corvus corone cornixHooded crow7Corvus fragilegusRook8Corvus monedulaJackdaw9Calandrella brachydactylaShort-toed lark10Falco tinnunculusCommon kestrel11Galerida cristataCrested lark12Melanocorypha calandraCalandra lark13Oenanthe oenantheNorthen weatear14Upupa epopsHoopoe15Pica picaMagpie16Passer domesticusHouse sparrow17Passer montanusTree sparrow18Perdix perdixGrey partridge19Sturnus vulgarisStarling20Lanius collurioRed-backed shrike21Coracias garrulusEuropean Roller22Merops apiasterBee-eater23Dendrocopos syriacusSyrian woodpecker24Carduelis cannabinaEurasian Linnet25Carduelis carduelisGoldfinch26Parus majorGreat tit27Parus caeruleusBlue tit28Phasianus colchicusCommon pheasant29Riparia ripariaSand martin30Saxicola rubetraWhinchat31Turdus merulaCommon blackbird32Streptopelia turturTurtle dove33Miliaria calandraCorn bunting34Apus apusCommon swift35Cucus canorusCuckoo36Emberiza hortulanaOrtolan bunting37Glaucidium passerinumPygmy owl38Athene noctuaLittle Owl39Motacilla albaWhite wagtail40Hirundo rusticaBarn swallow41Larus cachinansYellow-legged gull
description: Published as part of Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter & Gundert, Martin, 2013, Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW in null, Constanta County, Romania :European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) on page 225, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730259
title: Table 1 - 2 in Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW

description: Table 1-2 Summary of the birds species observed on Raggio Verde wind farm site and nearby
No.Scientific nameCommon name1Alauda arvensisSkylark2Anthus campestrisTawny pipit3Buteo buteoBuzzard4Buteo rufinusLong legged buzzard5Circus aeruginosusWestern Marsh-harrier6Corvus corone cornixHooded crow7Corvus fragilegusRook8Corvus monedulaJackdaw9Calandrella brachydactylaShort-toed lark10Falco tinnunculusCommon kestrel11Galerida cristataCrested lark12Melanocorypha calandraCalandra lark13Oenanthe oenantheNorthen weatear14Upupa epopsHoopoe15Pica picaMagpie16Passer domesticusHouse sparrow17Passer montanusTree sparrow18Perdix perdixGrey partridge19Sturnus vulgarisStarling20Lanius collurioRed-backed shrike21Coracias garrulusEuropean Roller22Merops apiasterBee-eater23Dendrocopos syriacusSyrian woodpecker24Carduelis cannabinaEurasian Linnet25Carduelis carduelisGoldfinch26Parus majorGreat tit27Parus caeruleusBlue tit28Phasianus colchicusCommon pheasant29Riparia ripariaSand martin30Saxicola rubetraWhinchat31Turdus merulaCommon blackbird32Streptopelia turturTurtle dove33Miliaria calandraCorn bunting34Apus apusCommon swift35Cucus canorusCuckoo36Emberiza hortulanaOrtolan bunting37Glaucidium passerinumPygmy owl38Athene noctuaLittle Owl39Motacilla albaWhite wagtail40Hirundo rusticaBarn swallow41Larus cachinansYellow-legged gull
description: Published as part of Temesvary, Peter, Heinz, Dr. Walter & Gundert, Martin, 2013, Additional Assessment Report - Crucea North Wind Farm 99 MW in null, Constanta County, Romania :European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) on page 225, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17263512
DOI: 10.15468/9cqgv6
title: Five new species and new records of click beetles from Saudi Arabia with an updated catalogue (Coleoptera, Elateridae)

description: This dataset contains the digitized treatments in Plazi based on the original journal article Platia, Giuseppe, Pedroni, Guido (2025): Five new species and new records of click beetles from Saudi Arabia with an updated catalogue (Coleoptera, Elateridae). Faunitaxys 13 (5): 1-12, DOI: 10.57800/faunitaxys-13(05), URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jorc.70017Abstract. – Five new species of click-beetles belonging to the genera Aeoloides Schwarz, 1906 (2), Craspedostethus Schwarz, 1900 (1) and Dicronychus Brullé, 1832 (2) are described and six species are recorded for the first time from Saudi Arabia. An updated catalogue leads to the total of 60 known species for the country.