cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135141
title: Table 1 in Resolving the synonymy and polyphyly of the ' Drosophila bakoue species complex' (Diptera: Drosophilidae: ' D. montium species group') with descriptions of two new species from Madagascar

description: Table 1. Strains of Drosophila Fallén, 1823 used in the current study, with GenBank accession numbers of their assembled mitogenomes.
SpeciesLocalityDateCollector(s)Donor/stockGenBank accession no.D. bocqueti Tsacas & Lachaise, 1974Andasibe, Madagascar2008J. R. David and A. YassinJ.R. DavidMK742870D. cf. bocqueti Tsacas & Lachaise, 1974São Tomé, São Tomé and Príncipe2014J.R. David and M. LangJ.R. DavidMK742871D. burlai Tsacas & Lachaise, 1974 D. chocolata Yassin & David sp. nov.Mount Oku, Cameroon Andasibe, Madagascar2008 2008M. Veuille J.R. David and A. YassinJ.R. David J.R. DavidMK742872 MK742873D. curta Chassagnard & Tsacas, 1997Andasibe, Madagascar2008J.R. David and A. YassinJ.R. DavidMK742874D. jambulina Parshad & Paika, 1964New Delhi, India1998J.R. DavidJ.R. DavidMK742875D. kikkawai Burla, 1954Chandigarh, India1998J.R. DavidJ.R. DavidMK742876D. leontia Tsacas & David, 1977Bangalore, India2000J.R. DavidJ.R. DavidMK742877D. malagassya Tsacas & Rafael, 1982Mandraka, Madagascar2008J.R. David and A. YassinJ.R. DavidMK742878D. mylenae David & Yassin sp. nov.Nosy Be, Madagascar2008J.R. David and M. DauvergneJ.R. DavidMK742879D. punjabiensis Parshad & Paika, 1964Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia1962M. WassermanDSSC (14028–0641.00)MK742880D. rufa Kikkawa & Peng, 1938Ehime, Japan1991UnknownDSSC (14028–0661.03)MK742881D. seguyi Smart, 1945Mayotte Island, France2013J.R. David, N. Gidaszewski and V. DebatJ.R. DavidMK742882D. tsacasi Bock & Wheeler, 1972Ivory Coast1951H. BurlaDSSC (14028–0701.00)MK742883D. aff. tsacasi Bock & Wheeler, 1972Kenya2005UnknownJ.R. DavidMK742884D. aff. tsacasi Bock & Wheeler, 1972Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea2013D. MatuteJ.R. DavidMK742885D. vulcana Graber, 1957Mount Selinda, Zimbabwe1971H.E. PatersonDSSC (14028–0711.00)MK742886
description: Published as part of Yassin, Amir, Suwalski, Arnaud & Raveloson Ravaomanarivo, Lala H., 2019, Resolving the synonymy and polyphyly of the ' Drosophila bakoue species complex' (Diptera: Drosophilidae: ' D. montium species group') with descriptions of two new species from Madagascar, pp. 3 in European Journal of Taxonomy 532 on page 3, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2019.532, http://zenodo.org/record/3251569
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135142
title: Table 1 in New species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 (Ischnocera: Philopteridae), with notes on Cypseloecus Conci, 1941

description: Table 1. Measurements (in millimetres) of Philopterus hebes sp. nov. and P. micropunctatus sp. nov. Some dimensions (e.g., APLL, TPVL) are measured on both sides of the body, and intervals may therefore be given even if only one specimen was examined. Abbreviations: ADPL = dorsal anterior plate length (at midline); ADPW = dorsal anterior plate width; AL = abdominal length (at midline); ANW = anterior notch width; APLL = dorsal anterior plate lateral length; AW = abdominal width (at segment V); GL = genital length (in male); GW = genital width (in male); HL = head length (at midline); HW = head width (at temples); PAL = preantennal length; PAW = preantennal width (at base of coni); PMCL = premarginal carina length; POL = postantennal length (at midline); PRL = prothoracic length; PRW = prothoracic width; PTL = pterothoracic length (at midline); PTW = pterothoracic width; SGPW = subgenital plate width (in female); TL = total length (at midline); TPVL = tergal plate V length; TRL = trabeculum length; TRW = trabeculum width.
Philopterus hebes sp. nov.Philopterus micropunctatus sp. nov.Chloropsis aurifrons inornataC. cochinchinensis kinneariAnthus hodgsoni♂♂ (n = 4) 1♀♀ (n = 5) 2♀ (n = 1) 3♂ (n = 1)♀♀ (n = 4)TotalTL1.55–1.681.63–2.172.101.381.56–1.74HeadHL0.52–0.550.53–0.630.600.500.51–0.53HW0.52–0.540.54–0.640.610.470.48–0.51ANW0.27–0.300.28–0.330.320.180.18–0.19ADPL0.21–0.230.23–0.290.270.270.26–0.28ADPW0.19–0.200.19–0.330.230.150.16APLL0.14–0.170.15–0.190.18–0.190.17–0.180.18–0.19PMCL0.070.07–0.080.08–0.090.100.10–0.11PAL0.12–0.140.12–0.160.150.160.18PAW0.28–0.360.37–0.450.430.310.31–0.33POL0.28–0.300.29–0.350.330.250.25–0.27TRL0.11–0.120.11–0.130.12–0.130.100.09–0.11TRW0.05–0.060.05–0.070.05–0.060.040.04ThoraxPRL0.13–0.140.13–0.170.140.110.11–0.15PRW0.32–0.370.33–0.380.370.290.29–0.33PTL0.19–0.210.21–0.220.240.160.16–0.17PTW0.46–0.490.48–0.580.570.400.44–0.46AbdomenAL0.66–0.810.77–1.161.130.630.75–0.95AW0.73–0.840.78–0.990.980.560.61–0.73TPVL0.13–0.140.14–0.190.18–0.190.09–0.100.12GenitalsGL0.24–0.29––0.20–GW0.10––0.08–SGPW–0.42–0.49––0.35
1 For PTW, n = 3 due to disruption of lateral margin of pterothorax in one specimen. For PTL, n = 3 as the posterior margin of the pterothorax is completely obscured by gut content in one specimen.
2 For SGPW, n = 4 as subgenital plate is obscured by gut content in one specimen.
3 Subgenital plate partially obscured by gut content and not measured.
description: Published as part of Gustafsson, Daniel R., Najer, Tomas, Zou, Fasheng & Bush, Sarah E., 2022, New species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 (Ischnocera: Philopteridae), with notes on Cypseloecus Conci, 1941, pp. 10 in European Journal of Taxonomy 790 (1) on page 10, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.790.1641, http://zenodo.org/record/5999772
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135143
title: Table 1 in New species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 (Ischnocera: Philopteridae), with notes on Cypseloecus Conci, 1941

description: Table 1. Measurements (in millimetres) of Philopterus hebes sp. nov. and P. micropunctatus sp. nov. Some dimensions (e.g., APLL, TPVL) are measured on both sides of the body, and intervals may therefore be given even if only one specimen was examined. Abbreviations: ADPL = dorsal anterior plate length (at midline); ADPW = dorsal anterior plate width; AL = abdominal length (at midline); ANW = anterior notch width; APLL = dorsal anterior plate lateral length; AW = abdominal width (at segment V); GL = genital length (in male); GW = genital width (in male); HL = head length (at midline); HW = head width (at temples); PAL = preantennal length; PAW = preantennal width (at base of coni); PMCL = premarginal carina length; POL = postantennal length (at midline); PRL = prothoracic length; PRW = prothoracic width; PTL = pterothoracic length (at midline); PTW = pterothoracic width; SGPW = subgenital plate width (in female); TL = total length (at midline); TPVL = tergal plate V length; TRL = trabeculum length; TRW = trabeculum width.
Philopterus hebes sp. nov.Philopterus micropunctatus sp. nov.Chloropsis aurifrons inornataC. cochinchinensis kinneariAnthus hodgsoni♂♂ (n = 4) 1♀♀ (n = 5) 2♀ (n = 1) 3♂ (n = 1)♀♀ (n = 4)TotalTL1.55–1.681.63–2.172.101.381.56–1.74HeadHL0.52–0.550.53–0.630.600.500.51–0.53HW0.52–0.540.54–0.640.610.470.48–0.51ANW0.27–0.300.28–0.330.320.180.18–0.19ADPL0.21–0.230.23–0.290.270.270.26–0.28ADPW0.19–0.200.19–0.330.230.150.16APLL0.14–0.170.15–0.190.18–0.190.17–0.180.18–0.19PMCL0.070.07–0.080.08–0.090.100.10–0.11PAL0.12–0.140.12–0.160.150.160.18PAW0.28–0.360.37–0.450.430.310.31–0.33POL0.28–0.300.29–0.350.330.250.25–0.27TRL0.11–0.120.11–0.130.12–0.130.100.09–0.11TRW0.05–0.060.05–0.070.05–0.060.040.04ThoraxPRL0.13–0.140.13–0.170.140.110.11–0.15PRW0.32–0.370.33–0.380.370.290.29–0.33PTL0.19–0.210.21–0.220.240.160.16–0.17PTW0.46–0.490.48–0.580.570.400.44–0.46AbdomenAL0.66–0.810.77–1.161.130.630.75–0.95AW0.73–0.840.78–0.990.980.560.61–0.73TPVL0.13–0.140.14–0.190.18–0.190.09–0.100.12GenitalsGL0.24–0.29––0.20–GW0.10––0.08–SGPW–0.42–0.49––0.35
1 For PTW, n = 3 due to disruption of lateral margin of pterothorax in one specimen. For PTL, n = 3 as the posterior margin of the pterothorax is completely obscured by gut content in one specimen.
2 For SGPW, n = 4 as subgenital plate is obscured by gut content in one specimen.
3 Subgenital plate partially obscured by gut content and not measured.
description: Published as part of Gustafsson, Daniel R., Najer, Tomas, Zou, Fasheng & Bush, Sarah E., 2022, New species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 (Ischnocera: Philopteridae), with notes on Cypseloecus Conci, 1941, pp. 10 in European Journal of Taxonomy 790 (1) on page 10, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.790.1641, http://zenodo.org/record/5999772
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135144
title: Table 2 in New species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 (Ischnocera: Philopteridae), with notes on Cypseloecus Conci, 1941

description: Table 2. Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy of the species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 described in this paper. Only tergal seta are included here; for sternal setae, see Table 3; for pleural setae, see Table 4. Anterior margin of tergopleurite II has 1 seta on each side in all species, which is not listed in the table. Numbers denote the numbers of setae on one side of the abdomen only; for setal counts in the entire setal row of each segment, these numbers thus need to be doubled. Abbreviation: mms = marginal mesometathoracic setae.
LouseSexThoracicTergalmmsIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIX+XPhilopterus afropari♂9–116–89–1010–1210–12 310–12 39–104–61sp. nov.♀97–810–1210–1210–1210–129–1062Philopterus coriaceus♂11–12109–119–119–119–117–83–51sp. nov.♀11–121010–1210–1210–12107–8, 10 14–61–2 2Philopterus hebes♂11–12811–1211–1211–1211–127–95–62sp. nov.♀11–128–1012–1312–1312–1312–1312–1383Philopterus micropunctatus♂9–107–88–98–98–98–98–95–61sp. nov.♀9–118–108–108–1011–129–1195–71Philopterus pseudhirundo♂1087–89–109–10874–51sp. nov.♀967–99–1010–117–854–51Philopterus sinensis♂8–978–96–7 486–8 46–74–51sp. nov.♀9–1067–87–89–107–87–851Philopterus stansburyensis♂11–1310–1110–1110–1110–118–128–1051sp. nov.♀14–1510–1111–1312–1411–1310–1210–115–71Philopterus trepostephanus♂9–117–87–99–109–109–107–94–51sp. nov.♀10–117–8910–1110–119–107–84–52
1 7–8 in one examined female, 10 in the other.
2 In addition, there is 1 seta on each side at the anterior end of this segment.
3 One male with 8 setae on one side of these segments.
4 Setal rows of these segments have significant gaps, indicating that 1–2 setae may be absent in the single examined male, but present if more males were examined. These numbers are thus preliminary.
description: Published as part of Gustafsson, Daniel R., Najer, Tomas, Zou, Fasheng & Bush, Sarah E., 2022, New species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 (Ischnocera: Philopteridae), with notes on Cypseloecus Conci, 1941, pp. 11 in European Journal of Taxonomy 790 (1) on page 11, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.790.1641, http://zenodo.org/record/5999772
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135145
title: Table 2 in New species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 (Ischnocera: Philopteridae), with notes on Cypseloecus Conci, 1941

description: Table 2. Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy of the species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 described in this paper. Only tergal seta are included here; for sternal setae, see Table 3; for pleural setae, see Table 4. Anterior margin of tergopleurite II has 1 seta on each side in all species, which is not listed in the table. Numbers denote the numbers of setae on one side of the abdomen only; for setal counts in the entire setal row of each segment, these numbers thus need to be doubled. Abbreviation: mms = marginal mesometathoracic setae.
LouseSexThoracicTergalmmsIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIX+XPhilopterus afropari♂9–116–89–1010–1210–12 310–12 39–104–61sp. nov.♀97–810–1210–1210–1210–129–1062Philopterus coriaceus♂11–12109–119–119–119–117–83–51sp. nov.♀11–121010–1210–1210–12107–8, 10 14–61–2 2Philopterus hebes♂11–12811–1211–1211–1211–127–95–62sp. nov.♀11–128–1012–1312–1312–1312–1312–1383Philopterus micropunctatus♂9–107–88–98–98–98–98–95–61sp. nov.♀9–118–108–108–1011–129–1195–71Philopterus pseudhirundo♂1087–89–109–10874–51sp. nov.♀967–99–1010–117–854–51Philopterus sinensis♂8–978–96–7 486–8 46–74–51sp. nov.♀9–1067–87–89–107–87–851Philopterus stansburyensis♂11–1310–1110–1110–1110–118–128–1051sp. nov.♀14–1510–1111–1312–1411–1310–1210–115–71Philopterus trepostephanus♂9–117–87–99–109–109–107–94–51sp. nov.♀10–117–8910–1110–119–107–84–52
1 7–8 in one examined female, 10 in the other.
2 In addition, there is 1 seta on each side at the anterior end of this segment.
3 One male with 8 setae on one side of these segments.
4 Setal rows of these segments have significant gaps, indicating that 1–2 setae may be absent in the single examined male, but present if more males were examined. These numbers are thus preliminary.
description: Published as part of Gustafsson, Daniel R., Najer, Tomas, Zou, Fasheng & Bush, Sarah E., 2022, New species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 (Ischnocera: Philopteridae), with notes on Cypseloecus Conci, 1941, pp. 11 in European Journal of Taxonomy 790 (1) on page 11, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.790.1641, http://zenodo.org/record/5999772
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135146
title: Table 3 in New species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 (Ischnocera: Philopteridae), with notes on Cypseloecus Conci, 1941

description: Table 3. Abdominal and vulval chaetotaxy of the species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 described in this paper. Only sternal setae are listed here; for tergal setae, see Table 2; for pleural setae, see Table 4. Numbers denote the numbers of setae on one side of the abdomen only; for setal counts in the entire setal row of each segment, these numbers thus need to be doubled.
LouseSexSternalVulvalIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIX+XLongMediumShortPhilopterus afropari♂3–43–44–54–54–5111–––sp. nov.♀3–44–54–54–54–52003–700–2Philopterus coriaceus♂5–65–65–64–54–5111–––sp. nov.♀66–75–64–542008–100–12–4Philopterus hebes♂3–53–53–521111–––sp. nov.♀2–32–32–32–32–32–3007–802–3Philopterus micropunctatus♂4–56655111–––sp. nov.♀3–54–64–64–64–620032–31–3Philopterus pseudhirundo♂4–57–85–65–64111–––sp. nov.♀55–76–76–76–7200503–4Philopterus sinensis♂3–464–54–54–5111–––sp. nov.♀46655200403–4Philopterus stansburyensis♂ 23–43–43–422–3111–––sp. nov.♀ 34–53–54–53–43–52006–80–1 41Philopterus trepostephanus♂4–54–5 14–54–54–5112–3–––sp. nov.♀35–65–64–54–52005–603–4
1 One specimen with 7 sternal setae on one side. Segments V–VI with additional, shorter sternal setae lateral to those associated with the sternal plate.
2 Two examined specimens with many sternal setae seemingly absent, and more material is necessary to confirm chaetotaxy of this species.
3 Two of three examined specimens with many sternal setae absent; the numbers mostly derived from single specimen.
4 All examined specimens with 1 medium seta on the left side and none on the right side.
description: Published as part of Gustafsson, Daniel R., Najer, Tomas, Zou, Fasheng & Bush, Sarah E., 2022, New species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 (Ischnocera: Philopteridae), with notes on Cypseloecus Conci, 1941, pp. 12 in European Journal of Taxonomy 790 (1) on page 12, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.790.1641, http://zenodo.org/record/5999772
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135147
title: Table 3 in New species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 (Ischnocera: Philopteridae), with notes on Cypseloecus Conci, 1941

description: Table 3. Abdominal and vulval chaetotaxy of the species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 described in this paper. Only sternal setae are listed here; for tergal setae, see Table 2; for pleural setae, see Table 4. Numbers denote the numbers of setae on one side of the abdomen only; for setal counts in the entire setal row of each segment, these numbers thus need to be doubled.
LouseSexSternalVulvalIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIX+XLongMediumShortPhilopterus afropari♂3–43–44–54–54–5111–––sp. nov.♀3–44–54–54–54–52003–700–2Philopterus coriaceus♂5–65–65–64–54–5111–––sp. nov.♀66–75–64–542008–100–12–4Philopterus hebes♂3–53–53–521111–––sp. nov.♀2–32–32–32–32–32–3007–802–3Philopterus micropunctatus♂4–56655111–––sp. nov.♀3–54–64–64–64–620032–31–3Philopterus pseudhirundo♂4–57–85–65–64111–––sp. nov.♀55–76–76–76–7200503–4Philopterus sinensis♂3–464–54–54–5111–––sp. nov.♀46655200403–4Philopterus stansburyensis♂ 23–43–43–422–3111–––sp. nov.♀ 34–53–54–53–43–52006–80–1 41Philopterus trepostephanus♂4–54–5 14–54–54–5112–3–––sp. nov.♀35–65–64–54–52005–603–4
1 One specimen with 7 sternal setae on one side. Segments V–VI with additional, shorter sternal setae lateral to those associated with the sternal plate.
2 Two examined specimens with many sternal setae seemingly absent, and more material is necessary to confirm chaetotaxy of this species.
3 Two of three examined specimens with many sternal setae absent; the numbers mostly derived from single specimen.
4 All examined specimens with 1 medium seta on the left side and none on the right side.
description: Published as part of Gustafsson, Daniel R., Najer, Tomas, Zou, Fasheng & Bush, Sarah E., 2022, New species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 (Ischnocera: Philopteridae), with notes on Cypseloecus Conci, 1941, pp. 12 in European Journal of Taxonomy 790 (1) on page 12, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.790.1641, http://zenodo.org/record/5999772
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135148
title: Table 4 in New species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 (Ischnocera: Philopteridae), with notes on Cypseloecus Conci, 1941

description: Table 4. Abdominal chaetotaxy of the species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 described in this paper. Only pleural setae are listed here; for tergal setae, see Table 2; for sternal setae, see Table 3. Numbers denote the numbers of setae on one side of the abdomen only; for setal counts in the entire setal row of each segment, these numbers thus need to be doubled. Abbreviations: ant. = anterior end; post. = posterior end.
LouseSexPleuralIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIX+X (ant.)IX+X (post.)Philopterus afropari♂013–43–44–53–4210sp. nov.♀014443213Philopterus coriaceus♂014–54–53–42–3210sp. nov.♀014442–3213Philopterus hebes♂015–65–65–63210sp. nov.♀014–54–54–53213–4Philopterus micropunctatus♂0133–443210sp. nov.♀014–54–54–52–3212Philopterus pseudhirundo 1♂014–5554210sp. nov.♀015–75–75–73313Philopterus sinensis♂002–32–344300sp. nov.♀003344313Philopterus stansburyensis♂013–42–42–61–32–310sp. nov.♀014–55–85–63–52–313Philopterus trepostephanus♂004454310sp. nov.♀004454413
1 Segments V–VI with additional, shorter sternal setae lateral to those associated with the sternal plate; on segment IV of single examined male these are closer to the pleural setae, and these setae are therefore here included in the count of pleural setae on all segments.
description: Published as part of Gustafsson, Daniel R., Najer, Tomas, Zou, Fasheng & Bush, Sarah E., 2022, New species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 (Ischnocera: Philopteridae), with notes on Cypseloecus Conci, 1941, pp. 13 in European Journal of Taxonomy 790 (1) on page 13, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.790.1641, http://zenodo.org/record/5999772
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135149
title: Table 4 in New species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 (Ischnocera: Philopteridae), with notes on Cypseloecus Conci, 1941

description: Table 4. Abdominal chaetotaxy of the species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 described in this paper. Only pleural setae are listed here; for tergal setae, see Table 2; for sternal setae, see Table 3. Numbers denote the numbers of setae on one side of the abdomen only; for setal counts in the entire setal row of each segment, these numbers thus need to be doubled. Abbreviations: ant. = anterior end; post. = posterior end.
LouseSexPleuralIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIX+X (ant.)IX+X (post.)Philopterus afropari♂013–43–44–53–4210sp. nov.♀014443213Philopterus coriaceus♂014–54–53–42–3210sp. nov.♀014442–3213Philopterus hebes♂015–65–65–63210sp. nov.♀014–54–54–53213–4Philopterus micropunctatus♂0133–443210sp. nov.♀014–54–54–52–3212Philopterus pseudhirundo 1♂014–5554210sp. nov.♀015–75–75–73313Philopterus sinensis♂002–32–344300sp. nov.♀003344313Philopterus stansburyensis♂013–42–42–61–32–310sp. nov.♀014–55–85–63–52–313Philopterus trepostephanus♂004454310sp. nov.♀004454413
1 Segments V–VI with additional, shorter sternal setae lateral to those associated with the sternal plate; on segment IV of single examined male these are closer to the pleural setae, and these setae are therefore here included in the count of pleural setae on all segments.
description: Published as part of Gustafsson, Daniel R., Najer, Tomas, Zou, Fasheng & Bush, Sarah E., 2022, New species of Philopterus Nitzsch, 1818 (Ischnocera: Philopteridae), with notes on Cypseloecus Conci, 1941, pp. 13 in European Journal of Taxonomy 790 (1) on page 13, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.790.1641, http://zenodo.org/record/5999772
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.30330250.v2
title: List of Tables - Impact of OTT Platforms on Traditional Audio-Visual Media

description: <i>The study examines the transformative impact of over-the-top (OTT) platforms on traditional audio-visual media in India, particularly among youth resided in Delhi, Jaipur, Faridabad and Mumbai, amid the shift from family TV viewing to personalized digital consumption accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Drawing on theories such as Binge Watching, Uses and Gratifications, and Innovation Adoption, the research highlights OTT's disruption through on-demand access, binge-watching, and algorithmic personalization, projecting India's OTT audience at 601 million by 2025. The research study aimed to analyze OTT's effect on traditional platforms' viewership; It also focused to identify youth viewing preferences; and the research study also aimed to explore entertainment content consumption patterns on OTT.</i><i>Employing a survey of 500 young adults (aged 15-34) in Jaipur, Delhi, Faridabad, and Mumbai via non-probability convenience sampling techniques, data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests for distribution uniformity, and one-way ANOVA for mean comparisons across platforms.</i><i>Based on gathered data and findings, the null hypothesis “OTT has not affected the viewership of traditional audio-visual viewership” (H1) was rejected. The research study also indicated that OTT reduced traditional engagement of youth, i.e., cinema visits: ANOVA confirms higher OTT mean scores for daily durations, i.e., a digital shift reshaping habits and challenging traditional media.</i>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.30330250
title: List of Tables - Impact of OTT Platforms on Traditional Audio-Visual Media

description: <i>The study examines the transformative impact of over-the-top (OTT) platforms on traditional audio-visual media in India, particularly among youth resided in Delhi, Jaipur, Faridabad and Mumbai, amid the shift from family TV viewing to personalized digital consumption accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Drawing on theories such as Binge Watching, Uses and Gratifications, and Innovation Adoption, the research highlights OTT's disruption through on-demand access, binge-watching, and algorithmic personalization, projecting India's OTT audience at 601 million by 2025. The research study aimed to analyze OTT's effect on traditional platforms' viewership; It also focused to identify youth viewing preferences; and the research study also aimed to explore entertainment content consumption patterns on OTT.</i><i>Employing a survey of 500 young adults (aged 15-34) in Jaipur, Delhi, Faridabad, and Mumbai via non-probability convenience sampling techniques, data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests for distribution uniformity, and one-way ANOVA for mean comparisons across platforms.</i><i>Based on gathered data and findings, the null hypothesis “OTT has not affected the viewership of traditional audio-visual viewership” (H1) was rejected. The research study also indicated that OTT reduced traditional engagement of youth, i.e., cinema visits: ANOVA confirms higher OTT mean scores for daily durations, i.e., a digital shift reshaping habits and challenging traditional media.</i>