cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517970.v1
title: Appendix D. Model-averaged, standardized parameter values regarding Diptera abundance and biomass measured on 40 farms located in southeastern Quebec, Canada, 2006–2008.

description: Model-averaged, standardized parameter values regarding Diptera abundance and biomass measured on 40 farms located in southeastern Quebec, Canada, 2006–2008.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517967
title: Appendix E. Model selection summary regarding Diptera abundance and biomass measured on 40 farms located in southeastern Quebec, Canada, for three years separately (2006, 2007, and 2008).

description: Model selection summary regarding Diptera abundance and biomass measured on 40 farms located in southeastern Quebec, Canada, for three years separately (2006, 2007, and 2008).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517967.v1
title: Appendix E. Model selection summary regarding Diptera abundance and biomass measured on 40 farms located in southeastern Quebec, Canada, for three years separately (2006, 2007, and 2008).

description: Model selection summary regarding Diptera abundance and biomass measured on 40 farms located in southeastern Quebec, Canada, for three years separately (2006, 2007, and 2008).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517961
title: Appendix F. Goodness-of-fit of linear mixed models computed to describe Diptera abundance and biomass patterns on 40 farms located in southeastern Quebec, Canada, in 2006, 2007, and 2008.

description: Goodness-of-fit of linear mixed models computed to describe Diptera abundance and biomass patterns on 40 farms located in southeastern Quebec, Canada, in 2006, 2007, and 2008.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517961.v1
title: Appendix F. Goodness-of-fit of linear mixed models computed to describe Diptera abundance and biomass patterns on 40 farms located in southeastern Quebec, Canada, in 2006, 2007, and 2008.

description: Goodness-of-fit of linear mixed models computed to describe Diptera abundance and biomass patterns on 40 farms located in southeastern Quebec, Canada, in 2006, 2007, and 2008.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517958
title: Appendix G. Model-averaged, standardized parameter values regarding Diptera abundance measured on 40 farms located in southeastern Quebec, Canada, for three years separately (2006, 2007, and 2008).

description: Model-averaged, standardized parameter values regarding Diptera abundance measured on 40 farms located in southeastern Quebec, Canada, for three years separately (2006, 2007, and 2008).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517958.v1
title: Appendix G. Model-averaged, standardized parameter values regarding Diptera abundance measured on 40 farms located in southeastern Quebec, Canada, for three years separately (2006, 2007, and 2008).

description: Model-averaged, standardized parameter values regarding Diptera abundance measured on 40 farms located in southeastern Quebec, Canada, for three years separately (2006, 2007, and 2008).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517955
title: Appendix H. Model-averaged, standardized parameter values regarding Diptera biomass measured on 40 farms located in southeastern Quebec, Canada, for three years separately (2006, 2007, and 2008).

description: Model-averaged, standardized parameter values regarding Diptera biomass measured on 40 farms located in southeastern Quebec, Canada, for three years separately (2006, 2007, and 2008).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517952
title: Appendix A. Results of mixed model analysis of changes in δ²H of wetland water over two summers.

description: Results of mixed model analysis of changes in δ²H of wetland water over two summers.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517955.v1
title: Appendix H. Model-averaged, standardized parameter values regarding Diptera biomass measured on 40 farms located in southeastern Quebec, Canada, for three years separately (2006, 2007, and 2008).

description: Model-averaged, standardized parameter values regarding Diptera biomass measured on 40 farms located in southeastern Quebec, Canada, for three years separately (2006, 2007, and 2008).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517952.v1
title: Appendix A. Results of mixed model analysis of changes in δ²H of wetland water over two summers.

description: Results of mixed model analysis of changes in δ²H of wetland water over two summers.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517949
title: Appendix B. Snail δ²H signatures and apparent net hydrogen isotopic discrimination, adjusted for the contribution of environmental water.

description: Snail δ²H signatures and apparent net hydrogen isotopic discrimination, adjusted for the contribution of environmental water.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517949.v1
title: Appendix B. Snail δ²H signatures and apparent net hydrogen isotopic discrimination, adjusted for the contribution of environmental water.

description: Snail δ²H signatures and apparent net hydrogen isotopic discrimination, adjusted for the contribution of environmental water.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517946
title: Appendix A. Color versions of Figs. 6–8.

description: Color versions of Figs. 6–8.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517946.v1
title: Appendix A. Color versions of Figs. 6–8.

description: Color versions of Figs. 6–8.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517943
title: Appendix A. Two tables summarizing details of the study design and plant species.

description: Two tables summarizing details of the study design and plant species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517940
title: Appendix B. Description of the methods and a table presenting results for plant species flowering phenology.

description: Description of the methods and a table presenting results for plant species flowering phenology.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517940.v1
title: Appendix B. Description of the methods and a table presenting results for plant species flowering phenology.

description: Description of the methods and a table presenting results for plant species flowering phenology.
DOI: 10.25919/5f51aaa404ea1
title: CSIRO Film Collection: videos 500 - 599 - archival versions

description: CSIRO produced its first film in 1946. It was a two-hour, five-part epic in black and white designed for a specialist audience of Commonwealth scientists meeting in London. It showed them - in the most graphic way possible at the time - the nature and extent of the research facilities of an organisation embarking on the problems of post-war reconstruction. Within a few years, a permanent film unit was established and began to specialise in producing films for the specific audiences on particular areas of research. By the 1960's, it became apparent that many of the films were of interest to a much wider audience. Schools, colleges and universities were beginning to introduce the audio-visual medium to the learning process and CSIRO films were in increasing demand. Makers of television programmes looked to CSIRO films for images of science not yet accessible to the public eye.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517937
title: Appendix C. A table summarizing arthropod abundance from flower species and planting treatments for each taxa collected.

description: A table summarizing arthropod abundance from flower species and planting treatments for each taxa collected.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517934
title: Appendix D. Detailed description of the methods used to quantify the dominance index and multivariate arthropod assemblages.

description: Detailed description of the methods used to quantify the dominance index and multivariate arthropod assemblages.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517934.v1
title: Appendix D. Detailed description of the methods used to quantify the dominance index and multivariate arthropod assemblages.

description: Detailed description of the methods used to quantify the dominance index and multivariate arthropod assemblages.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517931
title: Appendix E. Detailed description of the methods used to quantify variability in multivariate arthropod assemblages.

description: Detailed description of the methods used to quantify variability in multivariate arthropod assemblages.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517931.v1
title: Appendix E. Detailed description of the methods used to quantify variability in multivariate arthropod assemblages.

description: Detailed description of the methods used to quantify variability in multivariate arthropod assemblages.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517928
title: Appendix F. Arthropod abundance categorized by functional group for flower species and levels of plant diversity.

description: Arthropod abundance categorized by functional group for flower species and levels of plant diversity.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517928.v1
title: Appendix F. Arthropod abundance categorized by functional group for flower species and levels of plant diversity.

description: Arthropod abundance categorized by functional group for flower species and levels of plant diversity.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517922
title: Appendix A. Table with parameter estimates for the best-fit multiple simultaneous spatial autoregressive linear model.

description: Table with parameter estimates for the best-fit multiple simultaneous spatial autoregressive linear model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517922.v1
title: Appendix A. Table with parameter estimates for the best-fit multiple simultaneous spatial autoregressive linear model.

description: Table with parameter estimates for the best-fit multiple simultaneous spatial autoregressive linear model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517919
title: Appendix B. Figure showing the relative standard error (RSE) of mean switchgrass yield as a function of the number of random points distributed in each 27.5-km² cell.

description: Figure showing the relative standard error (RSE) of mean switchgrass yield as a function of the number of random points distributed in each 27.5-km² cell.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517919.v1
title: Appendix B. Figure showing the relative standard error (RSE) of mean switchgrass yield as a function of the number of random points distributed in each 27.5-km² cell.

description: Figure showing the relative standard error (RSE) of mean switchgrass yield as a function of the number of random points distributed in each 27.5-km² cell.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517916
title: Appendix C. The spatial distribution of the 2851 USDA-NRCS nonirrigated alfalfa yields across the north central and eastern United States used in Fig. 2.

description: The spatial distribution of the 2851 USDA-NRCS nonirrigated alfalfa yields across the north central and eastern United States used in Fig. 2.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517913
title: Appendix D. The first and second principal component scores for each weather station id and the loading for each variable.

description: The first and second principal component scores for each weather station id and the loading for each variable.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517916.v1
title: Appendix C. The spatial distribution of the 2851 USDA-NRCS nonirrigated alfalfa yields across the north central and eastern United States used in Fig. 2.

description: The spatial distribution of the 2851 USDA-NRCS nonirrigated alfalfa yields across the north central and eastern United States used in Fig. 2.
DOI: 10.7931/kabk-dn20
title: NZ Garden Bird Survey: participant feedback 2014–18
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517913.v1
title: Appendix D. The first and second principal component scores for each weather station id and the loading for each variable.

description: The first and second principal component scores for each weather station id and the loading for each variable.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517910
title: Appendix E. The change in switchgrass LBP expected from current climate by 2080–2090 under the A2 scenario in relation to changes in growing season precipitation, maximum temperature, and minimum temperature.

description: The change in switchgrass LBP expected from current climate by 2080–2090 under the A2 scenario in relation to changes in growing season precipitation, maximum temperature, and minimum temperature.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517910.v1
title: Appendix E. The change in switchgrass LBP expected from current climate by 2080–2090 under the A2 scenario in relation to changes in growing season precipitation, maximum temperature, and minimum temperature.

description: The change in switchgrass LBP expected from current climate by 2080–2090 under the A2 scenario in relation to changes in growing season precipitation, maximum temperature, and minimum temperature.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517907
title: Appendix A. Data sources and number of records for C. stoebe and P. sativa and for the genus Tamarix.

description: Data sources and number of records for C. stoebe and P. sativa and for the genus Tamarix.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517907.v1
title: Appendix A. Data sources and number of records for C. stoebe and P. sativa and for the genus Tamarix.

description: Data sources and number of records for C. stoebe and P. sativa and for the genus Tamarix.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517904
title: Appendix B. Habitat suitability predictions for the nontargeted models for the replicates 2–5 for C. stoebe and P. sativa and for the genus Tamarix.

description: Habitat suitability predictions for the nontargeted models for the replicates 2–5 for C. stoebe and P. sativa and for the genus Tamarix.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517904.v1
title: Appendix B. Habitat suitability predictions for the nontargeted models for the replicates 2–5 for C. stoebe and P. sativa and for the genus Tamarix.

description: Habitat suitability predictions for the nontargeted models for the replicates 2–5 for C. stoebe and P. sativa and for the genus Tamarix.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517901
title: Appendix C. Most important variables associated with presence of C. stoebe and P. sativa and the genus Tamarix for the original, targeted, and five nontargeted model runs.

description: Most important variables associated with presence of C. stoebe and P. sativa and the genus Tamarix for the original, targeted, and five nontargeted model runs.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517901.v1
title: Appendix C. Most important variables associated with presence of C. stoebe and P. sativa and the genus Tamarix for the original, targeted, and five nontargeted model runs.

description: Most important variables associated with presence of C. stoebe and P. sativa and the genus Tamarix for the original, targeted, and five nontargeted model runs.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12915980
title: WRR_Guo

description: data for the figures in WRR paper
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12915980.v1
title: WRR_Guo

description: data for the figures in WRR paper
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517898
title: Appendix A. Carbon pools and fluxes from control and organic matter amended plots for three water years at the valley and coastal grassland experimental sites.

description: Carbon pools and fluxes from control and organic matter amended plots for three water years at the valley and coastal grassland experimental sites.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517898.v1
title: Appendix A. Carbon pools and fluxes from control and organic matter amended plots for three water years at the valley and coastal grassland experimental sites.

description: Carbon pools and fluxes from control and organic matter amended plots for three water years at the valley and coastal grassland experimental sites.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517895
title: Appendix A. Verification of model fit.

description: Verification of model fit.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517895.v1
title: Appendix A. Verification of model fit.

description: Verification of model fit.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517892
title: Appendix B. Additional results from statistical models.

description: Additional results from statistical models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517892.v1
title: Appendix B. Additional results from statistical models.

description: Additional results from statistical models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517889
title: Appendix C. Seedling abundances in experimental plots.

description: Seedling abundances in experimental plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517889.v1
title: Appendix C. Seedling abundances in experimental plots.

description: Seedling abundances in experimental plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517886
title: Appendix D. Mineral nutrient composition of fecal samples and fertilizers.

description: Mineral nutrient composition of fecal samples and fertilizers.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517886.v1
title: Appendix D. Mineral nutrient composition of fecal samples and fertilizers.

description: Mineral nutrient composition of fecal samples and fertilizers.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517883
title: Appendix E. Estimates of moa contributions to N cycling.

description: Estimates of moa contributions to N cycling.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517883.v1
title: Appendix E. Estimates of moa contributions to N cycling.

description: Estimates of moa contributions to N cycling.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517880
title: Appendix A. Climate model and emission scenario ranks based on the ratio of mean seasonal Drought Code index of 2071–2100 to 1961–1990.

description: Climate model and emission scenario ranks based on the ratio of mean seasonal Drought Code index of 2071–2100 to 1961–1990.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517880.v1
title: Appendix A. Climate model and emission scenario ranks based on the ratio of mean seasonal Drought Code index of 2071–2100 to 1961–1990.

description: Climate model and emission scenario ranks based on the ratio of mean seasonal Drought Code index of 2071–2100 to 1961–1990.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517877
title: Appendix A. Tree-ring analyses for chronosequence validation and stand reconstruction.

description: Tree-ring analyses for chronosequence validation and stand reconstruction.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517877.v1
title: Appendix A. Tree-ring analyses for chronosequence validation and stand reconstruction.

description: Tree-ring analyses for chronosequence validation and stand reconstruction.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517874
title: Appendix B. Full statistical outputs from general linear models (GLM) for all fuel variables.

description: Full statistical outputs from general linear models (GLM) for all fuel variables.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517874.v1
title: Appendix B. Full statistical outputs from general linear models (GLM) for all fuel variables.

description: Full statistical outputs from general linear models (GLM) for all fuel variables.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517871
title: Appendix A. Wolves in the study area that took extraterritorial forays lived in the migratory elk area and generally traveled long distances toward migratory prey.

description: Wolves in the study area that took extraterritorial forays lived in the migratory elk area and generally traveled long distances toward migratory prey.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517868
title: Appendix A. Apparent scales of landscape predictor effects and results of comparisons of the explanatory power of distance- and composition-based measurements for each species and each statistical framework.

description: Apparent scales of landscape predictor effects and results of comparisons of the explanatory power of distance- and composition-based measurements for each species and each statistical framework.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517868.v1
title: Appendix A. Apparent scales of landscape predictor effects and results of comparisons of the explanatory power of distance- and composition-based measurements for each species and each statistical framework.

description: Apparent scales of landscape predictor effects and results of comparisons of the explanatory power of distance- and composition-based measurements for each species and each statistical framework.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517865
title: Appendix B. Summaries of the best single- and multi-scale habitat models for each species and each statistical framework.

description: Summaries of the best single- and multi-scale habitat models for each species and each statistical framework.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517865.v1
title: Appendix B. Summaries of the best single- and multi-scale habitat models for each species and each statistical framework.

description: Summaries of the best single- and multi-scale habitat models for each species and each statistical framework.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517862
title: Appendix C. Comparisons of predictive performance during model extrapolation for the best single-scale and multi-scale models for each species and each statistical framework.

description: Comparisons of predictive performance during model extrapolation for the best single-scale and multi-scale models for each species and each statistical framework.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517859
title: Appendix D. Assessments of residual spatial autocorrelation and multicollinearity in habitat models for each modeled species.

description: Assessments of residual spatial autocorrelation and multicollinearity in habitat models for each modeled species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517859.v1
title: Appendix D. Assessments of residual spatial autocorrelation and multicollinearity in habitat models for each modeled species.

description: Assessments of residual spatial autocorrelation and multicollinearity in habitat models for each modeled species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517856
title: Appendix A. Detailed methods for developing contemporary and future temperature data sets.

description: Detailed methods for developing contemporary and future temperature data sets.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517856.v1
title: Appendix A. Detailed methods for developing contemporary and future temperature data sets.

description: Detailed methods for developing contemporary and future temperature data sets.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517853
title: Appendix B. Specifics of parameter estimation methods and results.

description: Specifics of parameter estimation methods and results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517853.v1
title: Appendix B. Specifics of parameter estimation methods and results.

description: Specifics of parameter estimation methods and results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517850
title: Appendix C. Figures showing historical Oncomelania hupensis presence, location of cells for individual cell analysis, representative model output, sensitivity of time of first population peak to changes in δmin and K, and sensitivity of future O. hupensis distributions to changes in δmin and K.

description: Figures showing historical Oncomelania hupensis presence, location of cells for individual cell analysis, representative model output, sensitivity of time of first population peak to changes in δmin and K, and sensitivity of future O. hupensis distributions to changes in δmin and K.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517850.v1
title: Appendix C. Figures showing historical Oncomelania hupensis presence, location of cells for individual cell analysis, representative model output, sensitivity of time of first population peak to changes in δmin and K, and sensitivity of future O. hupensis distributions to changes in δmin and K.

description: Figures showing historical Oncomelania hupensis presence, location of cells for individual cell analysis, representative model output, sensitivity of time of first population peak to changes in δmin and K, and sensitivity of future O. hupensis distributions to changes in δmin and K.