cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.325086
title: Water temperature real-time profiles from cruise 5208300 (DCQC)

description: For definition of quality flags see hdl:10013/epic.31518.d001
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.359276
title: Water temperature real-time profiles from cruise LYKN90 (SCQC)

description: SCQC=quality controlled by Science Center. For definition of quality flags see hdl:10013/epic.31518.d001
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.118632
title: N-15 uptake rates at station TT045_8-2
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.120911
title: Particulate organic carbon at station TT011_9-MULVFS24
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.120934
title: Particulate organic C and N, total particulate carbon at station TT007_11-CTD134
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.945344
title: Carapace material properties of juvenile California spiny lobsters (Panulirus interruptus) in response to ocean acidification

description: We examined the response of multiple structures used for predator defense in the California spiny lobster, Panulirus interruptus, to a series of ocean acidification-like conditions. Lobsters were collected by modified commercial traps offshore La Jolla, CA (in the area around 32.8534193, -117.2687516) in October 2016 and held at ambient conditions (pH 7.97, 16.5℃) before exposure to stable or diurnally fluctuating reduced pH conditions established by bubbling CO2 and as measured using best practices (ambient pH/stable, 7.97, 16.5℃; reduced pH/stable 7.67, 16.6℃; reduced pH with low fluctuations, 7.67 ± 0.05, 16.4℃; reduced pH with high fluctuations, 7.67 ± 0.10, 16.4℃). After three months, the carapace spine and rostral horn tip were tested for hardness and stiffness using a nanoindentation materials testing machine (Nano Hardness Tester, Nanovea, Irvine, CA, USA) equipped with a Berkovich tip. Fresh samples (&lt;12 hours, except for two samples tested within 24 hours) were kept hydrated in seawater until testing. Samples were secured to an aluminum block with cyanoacrylate glue such that the outer surface was facing up. Indentations were performed by applying a load of 40 mN to the outer surface of the sample at loading and unloading rates of 80 mN/min with a 30 sec hold for creep. At least three indents were taken per sample.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.120982
title: Particulate organic C and N, total particulate carbon at station TT011_12-CTD154
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.802428
title: Component parts of the World Heat Flow Data Collection
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.230507
title: Smear slide analysis of Hole 25-239
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.805224
title: Component parts of the World Heat Flow Data Collection
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.807850
title: Component parts of the World Heat Flow Data Collection
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.808853
title: Component parts of the World Heat Flow Data Collection
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.808855
title: Component parts of the World Heat Flow Data Collection
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.804754
title: Component parts of the World Heat Flow Data Collection
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.120970
title: Particulate organic C and N, total particulate carbon at station TT011_1-CTD13
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.934761
title: Hydrogen (d2H) and oxygen (d18O) isotopes of human hair from the United States
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.934762
title: Element abundances of human hair from the United States
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.934765
title: Strontium isotope ratios (87Sr/86Sr) of human hair from the United States
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.957762
title: Recruitment of sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis at five sites in the Gulf of Maine monitored from 1994 to 2019

description: Recruitment of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis at five sites in the Gulf of Maine was monitored over the period from 1994 to 2019. A series of Astroturf panels attached to wire frames were deployed at White Island and Gosport Harbor, Isles of Shoals and Cape Neddick, Maine in the southern portion of the Gulf of Maine and at Fraser Point and Eastport, Maine in the northern section. The study began with White Island and Cape Neddick in 1994, Frazer Point and Eastport began in 1995 and Gosport Harbor was added in 2003. The panels were deployed in late May to early June and collected in late July, though some years collection was delayed and not all sites were sampled in some years. While 15 panels were deployed and 10 panels were analyzed only five randomly selected panels were used in this study, due to storm related panel array mortalities, to provide a consistent analysis for all sampled sites and years. The data is presented in an excel spread sheet for use for use by interested parties.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.815835
title: Meteorological synoptical observations from station Sede Boqer (2012-07)
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.118647
title: N-15 uptake rates at station TT049_20-4
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.263179
title: Minor-element chemical analyses of Hole 51-417A
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.115885
title: Particulate organic carbon and particulate organic nitrogen data at station TT043_21-22
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.118627
title: N-15 uptake rates at station TT045_5-4
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.128458
title: Concentration of POC and PON at station NBP97-01-18-3
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.116030
title: Particulate organic carbon and particulate organic nitrogen data at station TT054_7-27
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.118634
title: N-15 uptake rates at station TT049_1-2
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.222062
title: Grain size analysis of Hole 28-267B
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.115905
title: Particulate organic carbon and particulate organic nitrogen data at station TT045_11-2
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.128516
title: Concentration of POC and PON at station NBP97-08-20-4
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.807161
title: Component parts of the World Heat Flow Data Collection
DOI: 10.57754/fdat.m11t0-8q185
title: SORTS: A subject-object resolution test suite for morpho-syntactic and semantic model introspection

description: The SORTS test suite consists of 18,502 monotransitive clauses, annotated with word order, morpho-syntactic and semantic property classes. These properties have been specifically selected with respect to their effect on subject-object resolution.
 
description: Research carried out in work package A03 of the SFB 833.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.116026
title: Particulate organic carbon and particulate organic nitrogen data at station TT054_4-7
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.116027
title: Particulate organic carbon and particulate organic nitrogen data at station TT054_6-6
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.118651
title: N-15 uptake rates at station TT049_25-2
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.118610
title: N-15 uptake rates at station TT045_16-2
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.118655
title: N-15 uptake rates at station TT049_28-2
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.115891
title: Particulate organic carbon and particulate organic nitrogen data at station TT043_27-7
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.116023
title: Particulate organic carbon and particulate organic nitrogen data at station TT054_29-1
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.115946
title: Particulate organic carbon and particulate organic nitrogen data at station TT049_15-3
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.116029
title: Particulate organic carbon and particulate organic nitrogen data at station TT054_7-19
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.115907
title: Particulate organic carbon and particulate organic nitrogen data at station TT045_13-10
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.120912
title: Particulate organic carbon at station TT011_7-MULVFS22
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.952726
title: Positioning and telemetry from ROV survey PS122/3_32-11 on 2020-03-17, survey 1

description: The horizontal position of the remotely operated vehicle (ROV) during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition between November 2019 and September 2020 was measured using an acoustic Long Base Line (LBL) positioning system (LinkQuest Pinpoint). The position was recorded in the SPOT.ON survey systems software (OceanModulesTM). The track was smoothed from initial acoustic fixes and cleaned for most obvious outliers. The position is in a floe-fixed, relative coordinate system (X, Y) with the origin (X=0 m, Y=0 m) at the ROV hole. A quality flag for the position is introduced based on the time to the closest fix with “1” indicating good positon (fix reached &lt;= 3s), “2” medium position (fix reached &gt; 3s & &lt;= 5s), and “3” bad position (fix reached &gt; 5s). Depending on the scientific aim, a position with quality flag “3” can still be useful. Vehicle depth was measured by the integrated pressure sensor and calibrated to 0 during pre-survey procedures, when the top side of the vehicle was at the same level as the water surface. Vehicle attitude (roll, pitch, heading) was measured with an onboard inertial measuring unit (IMU, Microstrain) with three axis accelerometer, magnetometer and gyroscope. Depth was measured by a pressure sensor (Keller A-21Y, Keller AG) included in the main electronics housing of the ROV.
description: Horizontal position (X,Y):• Leg 1: Scale factors and offsets to successfully improve positions for surveys PS122_1_5_62_20191102_1 and PS122_1_6_16_20191105_1 were obtained by comparing positions of markers from the ROV and a terrestrial laser scanner (RIEGL). Scale factors and offsets for surveys PS122_1_6_31_20191106_1, PS122_1_6_118_20191110_1, PS122_1_7_18_20191112_1, PS122_1_7_55_20191113_1 are based on estimates but will be improved also using markers.• Leg 4: Positions for surveys PS122_4_48_213_20200726_1 and PS122_4_49_105_20200728_1 are partly distorted probably due to usage of drifting transponder(s) or erroneous transponder position configuration. Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.• Leg 5: probably due to drifting transponder(s). Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.952727
title: Positioning and telemetry from ROV survey PS122/3_32-33 on 2020-03-18, survey 1

description: The horizontal position of the remotely operated vehicle (ROV) during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition between November 2019 and September 2020 was measured using an acoustic Long Base Line (LBL) positioning system (LinkQuest Pinpoint). The position was recorded in the SPOT.ON survey systems software (OceanModulesTM). The track was smoothed from initial acoustic fixes and cleaned for most obvious outliers. The position is in a floe-fixed, relative coordinate system (X, Y) with the origin (X=0 m, Y=0 m) at the ROV hole. A quality flag for the position is introduced based on the time to the closest fix with “1” indicating good positon (fix reached &lt;= 3s), “2” medium position (fix reached &gt; 3s & &lt;= 5s), and “3” bad position (fix reached &gt; 5s). Depending on the scientific aim, a position with quality flag “3” can still be useful. Vehicle depth was measured by the integrated pressure sensor and calibrated to 0 during pre-survey procedures, when the top side of the vehicle was at the same level as the water surface. Vehicle attitude (roll, pitch, heading) was measured with an onboard inertial measuring unit (IMU, Microstrain) with three axis accelerometer, magnetometer and gyroscope. Depth was measured by a pressure sensor (Keller A-21Y, Keller AG) included in the main electronics housing of the ROV.
description: Horizontal position (X,Y):• Leg 1: Scale factors and offsets to successfully improve positions for surveys PS122_1_5_62_20191102_1 and PS122_1_6_16_20191105_1 were obtained by comparing positions of markers from the ROV and a terrestrial laser scanner (RIEGL). Scale factors and offsets for surveys PS122_1_6_31_20191106_1, PS122_1_6_118_20191110_1, PS122_1_7_18_20191112_1, PS122_1_7_55_20191113_1 are based on estimates but will be improved also using markers.• Leg 4: Positions for surveys PS122_4_48_213_20200726_1 and PS122_4_49_105_20200728_1 are partly distorted probably due to usage of drifting transponder(s) or erroneous transponder position configuration. Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.• Leg 5: probably due to drifting transponder(s). Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.830016
title: Basic measurements of radiation at station Palaiseau (2008-11)
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.952729
title: Positioning and telemetry from ROV survey PS122/3_32-34 on 2020-03-18, survey 2

description: The horizontal position of the remotely operated vehicle (ROV) during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition between November 2019 and September 2020 was measured using an acoustic Long Base Line (LBL) positioning system (LinkQuest Pinpoint). The position was recorded in the SPOT.ON survey systems software (OceanModulesTM). The track was smoothed from initial acoustic fixes and cleaned for most obvious outliers. The position is in a floe-fixed, relative coordinate system (X, Y) with the origin (X=0 m, Y=0 m) at the ROV hole. A quality flag for the position is introduced based on the time to the closest fix with “1” indicating good positon (fix reached &lt;= 3s), “2” medium position (fix reached &gt; 3s & &lt;= 5s), and “3” bad position (fix reached &gt; 5s). Depending on the scientific aim, a position with quality flag “3” can still be useful. Vehicle depth was measured by the integrated pressure sensor and calibrated to 0 during pre-survey procedures, when the top side of the vehicle was at the same level as the water surface. Vehicle attitude (roll, pitch, heading) was measured with an onboard inertial measuring unit (IMU, Microstrain) with three axis accelerometer, magnetometer and gyroscope. Depth was measured by a pressure sensor (Keller A-21Y, Keller AG) included in the main electronics housing of the ROV.
description: Horizontal position (X,Y):• Leg 1: Scale factors and offsets to successfully improve positions for surveys PS122_1_5_62_20191102_1 and PS122_1_6_16_20191105_1 were obtained by comparing positions of markers from the ROV and a terrestrial laser scanner (RIEGL). Scale factors and offsets for surveys PS122_1_6_31_20191106_1, PS122_1_6_118_20191110_1, PS122_1_7_18_20191112_1, PS122_1_7_55_20191113_1 are based on estimates but will be improved also using markers.• Leg 4: Positions for surveys PS122_4_48_213_20200726_1 and PS122_4_49_105_20200728_1 are partly distorted probably due to usage of drifting transponder(s) or erroneous transponder position configuration. Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.• Leg 5: probably due to drifting transponder(s). Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.952730
title: Positioning and telemetry from ROV survey PS122/3_32-78 on 2020-03-22, survey 1

description: The horizontal position of the remotely operated vehicle (ROV) during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition between November 2019 and September 2020 was measured using an acoustic Long Base Line (LBL) positioning system (LinkQuest Pinpoint). The position was recorded in the SPOT.ON survey systems software (OceanModulesTM). The track was smoothed from initial acoustic fixes and cleaned for most obvious outliers. The position is in a floe-fixed, relative coordinate system (X, Y) with the origin (X=0 m, Y=0 m) at the ROV hole. A quality flag for the position is introduced based on the time to the closest fix with “1” indicating good positon (fix reached &lt;= 3s), “2” medium position (fix reached &gt; 3s & &lt;= 5s), and “3” bad position (fix reached &gt; 5s). Depending on the scientific aim, a position with quality flag “3” can still be useful. Vehicle depth was measured by the integrated pressure sensor and calibrated to 0 during pre-survey procedures, when the top side of the vehicle was at the same level as the water surface. Vehicle attitude (roll, pitch, heading) was measured with an onboard inertial measuring unit (IMU, Microstrain) with three axis accelerometer, magnetometer and gyroscope. Depth was measured by a pressure sensor (Keller A-21Y, Keller AG) included in the main electronics housing of the ROV.
description: Horizontal position (X,Y):• Leg 1: Scale factors and offsets to successfully improve positions for surveys PS122_1_5_62_20191102_1 and PS122_1_6_16_20191105_1 were obtained by comparing positions of markers from the ROV and a terrestrial laser scanner (RIEGL). Scale factors and offsets for surveys PS122_1_6_31_20191106_1, PS122_1_6_118_20191110_1, PS122_1_7_18_20191112_1, PS122_1_7_55_20191113_1 are based on estimates but will be improved also using markers.• Leg 4: Positions for surveys PS122_4_48_213_20200726_1 and PS122_4_49_105_20200728_1 are partly distorted probably due to usage of drifting transponder(s) or erroneous transponder position configuration. Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.• Leg 5: probably due to drifting transponder(s). Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.952731
title: Positioning and telemetry from ROV survey PS122/3_33-27 on 2020-03-24, survey 1

description: The horizontal position of the remotely operated vehicle (ROV) during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition between November 2019 and September 2020 was measured using an acoustic Long Base Line (LBL) positioning system (LinkQuest Pinpoint). The position was recorded in the SPOT.ON survey systems software (OceanModulesTM). The track was smoothed from initial acoustic fixes and cleaned for most obvious outliers. The position is in a floe-fixed, relative coordinate system (X, Y) with the origin (X=0 m, Y=0 m) at the ROV hole. A quality flag for the position is introduced based on the time to the closest fix with “1” indicating good positon (fix reached &lt;= 3s), “2” medium position (fix reached &gt; 3s & &lt;= 5s), and “3” bad position (fix reached &gt; 5s). Depending on the scientific aim, a position with quality flag “3” can still be useful. Vehicle depth was measured by the integrated pressure sensor and calibrated to 0 during pre-survey procedures, when the top side of the vehicle was at the same level as the water surface. Vehicle attitude (roll, pitch, heading) was measured with an onboard inertial measuring unit (IMU, Microstrain) with three axis accelerometer, magnetometer and gyroscope. Depth was measured by a pressure sensor (Keller A-21Y, Keller AG) included in the main electronics housing of the ROV.
description: Horizontal position (X,Y):• Leg 1: Scale factors and offsets to successfully improve positions for surveys PS122_1_5_62_20191102_1 and PS122_1_6_16_20191105_1 were obtained by comparing positions of markers from the ROV and a terrestrial laser scanner (RIEGL). Scale factors and offsets for surveys PS122_1_6_31_20191106_1, PS122_1_6_118_20191110_1, PS122_1_7_18_20191112_1, PS122_1_7_55_20191113_1 are based on estimates but will be improved also using markers.• Leg 4: Positions for surveys PS122_4_48_213_20200726_1 and PS122_4_49_105_20200728_1 are partly distorted probably due to usage of drifting transponder(s) or erroneous transponder position configuration. Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.• Leg 5: probably due to drifting transponder(s). Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.952732
title: Positioning and telemetry from ROV survey PS122/3_33-83 on 2020-03-28, survey 1

description: The horizontal position of the remotely operated vehicle (ROV) during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition between November 2019 and September 2020 was measured using an acoustic Long Base Line (LBL) positioning system (LinkQuest Pinpoint). The position was recorded in the SPOT.ON survey systems software (OceanModulesTM). The track was smoothed from initial acoustic fixes and cleaned for most obvious outliers. The position is in a floe-fixed, relative coordinate system (X, Y) with the origin (X=0 m, Y=0 m) at the ROV hole. A quality flag for the position is introduced based on the time to the closest fix with “1” indicating good positon (fix reached &lt;= 3s), “2” medium position (fix reached &gt; 3s & &lt;= 5s), and “3” bad position (fix reached &gt; 5s). Depending on the scientific aim, a position with quality flag “3” can still be useful. Vehicle depth was measured by the integrated pressure sensor and calibrated to 0 during pre-survey procedures, when the top side of the vehicle was at the same level as the water surface. Vehicle attitude (roll, pitch, heading) was measured with an onboard inertial measuring unit (IMU, Microstrain) with three axis accelerometer, magnetometer and gyroscope. Depth was measured by a pressure sensor (Keller A-21Y, Keller AG) included in the main electronics housing of the ROV.
description: Horizontal position (X,Y):• Leg 1: Scale factors and offsets to successfully improve positions for surveys PS122_1_5_62_20191102_1 and PS122_1_6_16_20191105_1 were obtained by comparing positions of markers from the ROV and a terrestrial laser scanner (RIEGL). Scale factors and offsets for surveys PS122_1_6_31_20191106_1, PS122_1_6_118_20191110_1, PS122_1_7_18_20191112_1, PS122_1_7_55_20191113_1 are based on estimates but will be improved also using markers.• Leg 4: Positions for surveys PS122_4_48_213_20200726_1 and PS122_4_49_105_20200728_1 are partly distorted probably due to usage of drifting transponder(s) or erroneous transponder position configuration. Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.• Leg 5: probably due to drifting transponder(s). Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.952733
title: Positioning and telemetry from ROV survey PS122/3_34-20 on 2020-03-31, survey 1

description: The horizontal position of the remotely operated vehicle (ROV) during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition between November 2019 and September 2020 was measured using an acoustic Long Base Line (LBL) positioning system (LinkQuest Pinpoint). The position was recorded in the SPOT.ON survey systems software (OceanModulesTM). The track was smoothed from initial acoustic fixes and cleaned for most obvious outliers. The position is in a floe-fixed, relative coordinate system (X, Y) with the origin (X=0 m, Y=0 m) at the ROV hole. A quality flag for the position is introduced based on the time to the closest fix with “1” indicating good positon (fix reached &lt;= 3s), “2” medium position (fix reached &gt; 3s & &lt;= 5s), and “3” bad position (fix reached &gt; 5s). Depending on the scientific aim, a position with quality flag “3” can still be useful. Vehicle depth was measured by the integrated pressure sensor and calibrated to 0 during pre-survey procedures, when the top side of the vehicle was at the same level as the water surface. Vehicle attitude (roll, pitch, heading) was measured with an onboard inertial measuring unit (IMU, Microstrain) with three axis accelerometer, magnetometer and gyroscope. Depth was measured by a pressure sensor (Keller A-21Y, Keller AG) included in the main electronics housing of the ROV.
description: Horizontal position (X,Y):• Leg 1: Scale factors and offsets to successfully improve positions for surveys PS122_1_5_62_20191102_1 and PS122_1_6_16_20191105_1 were obtained by comparing positions of markers from the ROV and a terrestrial laser scanner (RIEGL). Scale factors and offsets for surveys PS122_1_6_31_20191106_1, PS122_1_6_118_20191110_1, PS122_1_7_18_20191112_1, PS122_1_7_55_20191113_1 are based on estimates but will be improved also using markers.• Leg 4: Positions for surveys PS122_4_48_213_20200726_1 and PS122_4_49_105_20200728_1 are partly distorted probably due to usage of drifting transponder(s) or erroneous transponder position configuration. Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.• Leg 5: probably due to drifting transponder(s). Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.