cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1510992
title: StarPlus fMRI data

description: This data was originally collected by Marcel Just and his colleagues in Carnegie Mellon University's CCBI. The Experiment Timing: The experiment consists of a set of trials, and the data is partitioned into trials. For some of these intervals, the subject simply rested, or gazed at a fixation point on the screen. For other trials, the subject was shown a picture and a sentence, and instructed to press a button to indicate whether the sentence correctly described the picture. For these trials, the sentence and picture were presented in sequence, with the picture presented first on half of the trials, and the sentence presented first on the other half of the trials. Forty such trials are available for each subject. The timing within each such trial is as follows: The first stimulus (sentence or picture) was presented at the begining of the trail (image=1).Four seconds later (image=9) the stimulus was removed, replaced by a blank screen.Four seconds later (image=17) the second stimulus was presented. This remained on the screen for four seconds, or until the subject pressed the mouse button, whichever came first.A rest period of 15 seconds (30 images) was added after the second stimulus was removed from the screen. Thus, each trial lasted a total of approximately 27 seconds (approximately 54 images). Imaging parameters: Images were collected every 500msec. Only a fraction of the brain of each subject was imaged. The data is marked up with 25-30 anatomically defined regions (called "Regions of Interest", or ROIs).Stimulus and behavioral data: A variety of information is available for all three data sets, including the exact sentences and pictures presented, and the subject response times. The Data: The data consists of .mat files that can be directly loaded into Matlab version 7.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1512306.v1
title: Tringali & Bowman 2012

description: The data and R scripts used in Tringali & Bowman 2012. Plumage reflectance signals dominance in Florida Scrub-Jay, Aphelocoma coerulescens, juveniles. Animal Behaviour, 84, 1517-1522. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347212004277
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1510991
title: StarPlus fMRI data

description: This data was originally collected by Marcel Just and his colleagues in Carnegie Mellon University's CCBI. The Experiment Timing: The experiment consists of a set of trials, and the data is partitioned into trials. For some of these intervals, the subject simply rested, or gazed at a fixation point on the screen. For other trials, the subject was shown a picture and a sentence, and instructed to press a button to indicate whether the sentence correctly described the picture. For these trials, the sentence and picture were presented in sequence, with the picture presented first on half of the trials, and the sentence presented first on the other half of the trials. Forty such trials are available for each subject. The timing within each such trial is as follows: The first stimulus (sentence or picture) was presented at the begining of the trail (image=1).Four seconds later (image=9) the stimulus was removed, replaced by a blank screen.Four seconds later (image=17) the second stimulus was presented. This remained on the screen for four seconds, or until the subject pressed the mouse button, whichever came first.A rest period of 15 seconds (30 images) was added after the second stimulus was removed from the screen. Thus, each trial lasted a total of approximately 27 seconds (approximately 54 images). Imaging parameters: Images were collected every 500msec. Only a fraction of the brain of each subject was imaged. The data is marked up with 25-30 anatomically defined regions (called "Regions of Interest", or ROIs).Stimulus and behavioral data: A variety of information is available for all three data sets, including the exact sentences and pictures presented, and the subject response times. The Data: The data consists of .mat files that can be directly loaded into Matlab version 7.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1510990
title: StarPlus fMRI data

description: This data was originally collected by Marcel Just and his colleagues in Carnegie Mellon University's CCBI. The Experiment Timing: The experiment consists of a set of trials, and the data is partitioned into trials. For some of these intervals, the subject simply rested, or gazed at a fixation point on the screen. For other trials, the subject was shown a picture and a sentence, and instructed to press a button to indicate whether the sentence correctly described the picture. For these trials, the sentence and picture were presented in sequence, with the picture presented first on half of the trials, and the sentence presented first on the other half of the trials. Forty such trials are available for each subject. The timing within each such trial is as follows: The first stimulus (sentence or picture) was presented at the begining of the trail (image=1).Four seconds later (image=9) the stimulus was removed, replaced by a blank screen.Four seconds later (image=17) the second stimulus was presented. This remained on the screen for four seconds, or until the subject pressed the mouse button, whichever came first.A rest period of 15 seconds (30 images) was added after the second stimulus was removed from the screen. Thus, each trial lasted a total of approximately 27 seconds (approximately 54 images). Imaging parameters: Images were collected every 500msec. Only a fraction of the brain of each subject was imaged. The data is marked up with 25-30 anatomically defined regions (called "Regions of Interest", or ROIs).Stimulus and behavioral data: A variety of information is available for all three data sets, including the exact sentences and pictures presented, and the subject response times. The Data: The data consists of .mat files that can be directly loaded into Matlab version 7.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1510992.v1
title: StarPlus fMRI data

description: This data was originally collected by Marcel Just and his colleagues in Carnegie Mellon University's CCBI. The Experiment Timing: The experiment consists of a set of trials, and the data is partitioned into trials. For some of these intervals, the subject simply rested, or gazed at a fixation point on the screen. For other trials, the subject was shown a picture and a sentence, and instructed to press a button to indicate whether the sentence correctly described the picture. For these trials, the sentence and picture were presented in sequence, with the picture presented first on half of the trials, and the sentence presented first on the other half of the trials. Forty such trials are available for each subject. The timing within each such trial is as follows: The first stimulus (sentence or picture) was presented at the begining of the trail (image=1).Four seconds later (image=9) the stimulus was removed, replaced by a blank screen.Four seconds later (image=17) the second stimulus was presented. This remained on the screen for four seconds, or until the subject pressed the mouse button, whichever came first.A rest period of 15 seconds (30 images) was added after the second stimulus was removed from the screen. Thus, each trial lasted a total of approximately 27 seconds (approximately 54 images). Imaging parameters: Images were collected every 500msec. Only a fraction of the brain of each subject was imaged. The data is marked up with 25-30 anatomically defined regions (called "Regions of Interest", or ROIs).Stimulus and behavioral data: A variety of information is available for all three data sets, including the exact sentences and pictures presented, and the subject response times. The Data: The data consists of .mat files that can be directly loaded into Matlab version 7.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1511379.v2
title: ANLP annual meetings bibliographic records (1995-2015)

description: 1995年から2015年の言語処理学会年次大会の講演のタイトル、著者、予稿PDFのURL等をまとめたJSONファイルです。 情報源は http://www.anlp.jp/guide/nenji.html です。
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1512834.v25
title: Localized Protein Quantification of Blood Brain Barrier Vasculature in Brightfield IHC Images

description: In this paper, we present an objective method for locally quantifying proteins in blood brain barrier (BBB) vasculature using standard immunohistochemistry (IHC) techniques and bright-field microscopy. Images from the hippocampal region at the BBB are acquired using bright-field microscopy and subjected to our immunohistochemistry quantification (IQ) algorithm which is designed to automatically identify and segment microvessels containing the protein glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1). Gabor filtering and k-means clustering are employed to isolate potential vascular structures within cryopsectioned slabs of the hippocampus, which are subsequently subjected to feature extraction followed by classification via decision forest. The false positive rate (FPR) of microvessel classification is characterized using synthetic and non-synthetic IHC image data for image entropies ranging between 3 and 8 bits. The average FPR for synthetic and non-synthetic IHC image data was found to be 5.48% and 5.04%, respectively.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1510990.v1
title: StarPlus fMRI data

description: This data was originally collected by Marcel Just and his colleagues in Carnegie Mellon University's CCBI. The Experiment Timing: The experiment consists of a set of trials, and the data is partitioned into trials. For some of these intervals, the subject simply rested, or gazed at a fixation point on the screen. For other trials, the subject was shown a picture and a sentence, and instructed to press a button to indicate whether the sentence correctly described the picture. For these trials, the sentence and picture were presented in sequence, with the picture presented first on half of the trials, and the sentence presented first on the other half of the trials. Forty such trials are available for each subject. The timing within each such trial is as follows: The first stimulus (sentence or picture) was presented at the begining of the trail (image=1).Four seconds later (image=9) the stimulus was removed, replaced by a blank screen.Four seconds later (image=17) the second stimulus was presented. This remained on the screen for four seconds, or until the subject pressed the mouse button, whichever came first.A rest period of 15 seconds (30 images) was added after the second stimulus was removed from the screen. Thus, each trial lasted a total of approximately 27 seconds (approximately 54 images). Imaging parameters: Images were collected every 500msec. Only a fraction of the brain of each subject was imaged. The data is marked up with 25-30 anatomically defined regions (called "Regions of Interest", or ROIs).Stimulus and behavioral data: A variety of information is available for all three data sets, including the exact sentences and pictures presented, and the subject response times. The Data: The data consists of .mat files that can be directly loaded into Matlab version 7.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1511379.v1
title: ANLP annual meetings bibliographic records (1995-2015)

description: 1995年から2015年の言語処理学会年次大会の講演のタイトル、著者、予稿PDFのURL等をまとめたJSONファイルです。 情報源は http://www.anlp.jp/guide/nenji.html です。
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1510988
title: StarPlus fMRI data

description: This data was originally collected by Marcel Just and his colleagues in Carnegie Mellon University's CCBI. The Experiment Timing: The experiment consists of a set of trials, and the data is partitioned into trials. For some of these intervals, the subject simply rested, or gazed at a fixation point on the screen. For other trials, the subject was shown a picture and a sentence, and instructed to press a button to indicate whether the sentence correctly described the picture. For these trials, the sentence and picture were presented in sequence, with the picture presented first on half of the trials, and the sentence presented first on the other half of the trials. Forty such trials are available for each subject. The timing within each such trial is as follows: The first stimulus (sentence or picture) was presented at the begining of the trail (image=1).Four seconds later (image=9) the stimulus was removed, replaced by a blank screen.Four seconds later (image=17) the second stimulus was presented. This remained on the screen for four seconds, or until the subject pressed the mouse button, whichever came first.A rest period of 15 seconds (30 images) was added after the second stimulus was removed from the screen. Thus, each trial lasted a total of approximately 27 seconds (approximately 54 images). Imaging parameters: Images were collected every 500msec. Only a fraction of the brain of each subject was imaged. The data is marked up with 25-30 anatomically defined regions (called "Regions of Interest", or ROIs).Stimulus and behavioral data: A variety of information is available for all three data sets, including the exact sentences and pictures presented, and the subject response times. The Data: The data consists of .mat files that can be directly loaded into Matlab version 7.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1510987
title: StarPlus fMRI data

description: This data was originally collected by Marcel Just and his colleagues in Carnegie Mellon University's CCBI. The Experiment Timing: The experiment consists of a set of trials, and the data is partitioned into trials. For some of these intervals, the subject simply rested, or gazed at a fixation point on the screen. For other trials, the subject was shown a picture and a sentence, and instructed to press a button to indicate whether the sentence correctly described the picture. For these trials, the sentence and picture were presented in sequence, with the picture presented first on half of the trials, and the sentence presented first on the other half of the trials. Forty such trials are available for each subject. The timing within each such trial is as follows: The first stimulus (sentence or picture) was presented at the begining of the trail (image=1).Four seconds later (image=9) the stimulus was removed, replaced by a blank screen.Four seconds later (image=17) the second stimulus was presented. This remained on the screen for four seconds, or until the subject pressed the mouse button, whichever came first.A rest period of 15 seconds (30 images) was added after the second stimulus was removed from the screen. Thus, each trial lasted a total of approximately 27 seconds (approximately 54 images). Imaging parameters: Images were collected every 500msec. Only a fraction of the brain of each subject was imaged. The data is marked up with 25-30 anatomically defined regions (called "Regions of Interest", or ROIs).Stimulus and behavioral data: A variety of information is available for all three data sets, including the exact sentences and pictures presented, and the subject response times. The Data: The data consists of .mat files that can be directly loaded into Matlab version 7.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1510986
title: StarPlus fMRI data

description: This data was originally collected by Marcel Just and his colleagues in Carnegie Mellon University's CCBI. The Experiment Timing: The experiment consists of a set of trials, and the data is partitioned into trials. For some of these intervals, the subject simply rested, or gazed at a fixation point on the screen. For other trials, the subject was shown a picture and a sentence, and instructed to press a button to indicate whether the sentence correctly described the picture. For these trials, the sentence and picture were presented in sequence, with the picture presented first on half of the trials, and the sentence presented first on the other half of the trials. Forty such trials are available for each subject. The timing within each such trial is as follows: The first stimulus (sentence or picture) was presented at the begining of the trail (image=1).Four seconds later (image=9) the stimulus was removed, replaced by a blank screen.Four seconds later (image=17) the second stimulus was presented. This remained on the screen for four seconds, or until the subject pressed the mouse button, whichever came first.A rest period of 15 seconds (30 images) was added after the second stimulus was removed from the screen. Thus, each trial lasted a total of approximately 27 seconds (approximately 54 images). Imaging parameters: Images were collected every 500msec. Only a fraction of the brain of each subject was imaged. The data is marked up with 25-30 anatomically defined regions (called "Regions of Interest", or ROIs).Stimulus and behavioral data: A variety of information is available for all three data sets, including the exact sentences and pictures presented, and the subject response times. The Data: The data consists of .mat files that can be directly loaded into Matlab version 7.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1510987.v1
title: StarPlus fMRI data

description: This data was originally collected by Marcel Just and his colleagues in Carnegie Mellon University's CCBI. The Experiment Timing: The experiment consists of a set of trials, and the data is partitioned into trials. For some of these intervals, the subject simply rested, or gazed at a fixation point on the screen. For other trials, the subject was shown a picture and a sentence, and instructed to press a button to indicate whether the sentence correctly described the picture. For these trials, the sentence and picture were presented in sequence, with the picture presented first on half of the trials, and the sentence presented first on the other half of the trials. Forty such trials are available for each subject. The timing within each such trial is as follows: The first stimulus (sentence or picture) was presented at the begining of the trail (image=1).Four seconds later (image=9) the stimulus was removed, replaced by a blank screen.Four seconds later (image=17) the second stimulus was presented. This remained on the screen for four seconds, or until the subject pressed the mouse button, whichever came first.A rest period of 15 seconds (30 images) was added after the second stimulus was removed from the screen. Thus, each trial lasted a total of approximately 27 seconds (approximately 54 images). Imaging parameters: Images were collected every 500msec. Only a fraction of the brain of each subject was imaged. The data is marked up with 25-30 anatomically defined regions (called "Regions of Interest", or ROIs).Stimulus and behavioral data: A variety of information is available for all three data sets, including the exact sentences and pictures presented, and the subject response times. The Data: The data consists of .mat files that can be directly loaded into Matlab version 7.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1512834.v26
title: Localized Protein Quantification of Blood Brain Barrier Vasculature in Brightfield IHC Images

description: In this paper, we present an objective method for locally quantifying proteins in blood brain barrier (BBB) vasculature using standard immunohistochemistry (IHC) techniques and bright-field microscopy. Images from the hippocampal region at the BBB are acquired using bright-field microscopy and subjected to our immunohistochemistry quantification (IQ) algorithm which is designed to automatically identify and segment microvessels containing the protein glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1). Gabor filtering and k-means clustering are employed to isolate potential vascular structures within cryopsectioned slabs of the hippocampus, which are subsequently subjected to feature extraction followed by classification via decision forest. The false positive rate (FPR) of microvessel classification is characterized using synthetic and non-synthetic IHC image data for image entropies ranging between 3 and 8 bits. The average FPR for synthetic and non-synthetic IHC image data was found to be 5.48% and 5.04%, respectively.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1510982
title: Dissertation

description: Dissertation as submitted. Additional versions will be uploaded as papers are finalized at journals.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1510969
title: Zero to VIVO in 7 Days

description: A presentation given by Jonathan Breeze, Symplectic & Juergen Wast, University of Cambridge, UK at the VIVO 2015 conference in Cambridge, MA. Abstract: Notwithstanding the collaborative efforts of the VIVO community, the technical and data related tasks associated with implementing and populating VIVO continue to act as significant barriers to wide adoption of the VIVO platform. In direct response to these challenges, Symplectic has developed a quick and effective means of installing, implementing and populating a production ready VIVO instance for subscribers of Symplectic's Research Information Management System, Elements. Titled ‘Zero to VIVO in 7 Days’, this session will introduce how this process works, from the acquisition of a new server through to the population of VIVO using linked data captured in Elements. This new service also includes an analysis of triples captured in VIVO and a report to help inform further data curation inside Elements. This session will include a short demonstration by Juergen Wastl, Head of Research Information at University of Cambridge.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1510980
title: Long-term sediment oxygen demand and net N2 fluxes in Narragansett Bay, RI (USA)

description: Since 2005 I have been measuring sediment oxygen demand and sediment net N2 fluxes at two stations in Narragansett Bay. The first station is at the head of the Providence River Estuary and the second is located in mid-Narragansett Bay. Sediments are collected by divers at the mid-Narragansett Bay site and with pull corer in the Providence River estuary. At least triplicate cores are collected. Cores are 10 cm i.d. and 30.5 cm long. At the time of core collection filtered (0.2 micron) site water is also collected for use in the incubations. All incubations are conducted in batch mode in the dark and the overlying water is gently stirred (~ 40 rpm) with a magnetic stir bar. O2 and N2 fluxes are measured using the N2/Ar technique and a membrane inlet mass spectrometer. For further details please see the references associated with these data. Questions? please email: rwf@bu.edu. Units are: O2 micromoles per meter squared per hour N2-N micromoles per meter squared per hour Site Names: Prov = Providence River Estuary (PRE mean sampling depth: 3 m) Mid Bay = Mid Narragansett Bay (MNB mean sampling depth: 8 m) Overtime these values have been published in various places. The links below include all places where these data have been published. Many people have helped along the way from teaching me the ways of the mass spectrometer to helping collect sediment cores and analyze data. Special thanks to: J. Cornwell, P. Dimilla, S. Donovan, L. Fields, S. Foster, A. Giblin, S. Granger, K. Hanks, A. Hanson, E. Heiss, J. Iccano, M. Horn, T. Kana, J. Krumholz, C. McManus, J. Mercer, C. Mueller, M. Owens, A. Pimenta, MK Rogener, R. Schweiker, M. Traber, and J.Tucker. I thank Boston University for providing laboratory space and equipment for the most recent measurements.