cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.15468/9dh4cp
title: Dorobaea linearifolia (Asteraceae, Senecioneae), a distinctive new species of the subtropical montane forests of central Peru

description: This dataset contains the digitized treatments in Plazi based on the original journal article Montesinos-Tubée, Daniel B., Pruski, John F. (2025): Dorobaea linearifolia (Asteraceae, Senecioneae), a distinctive new species of the subtropical montane forests of central Peru. PhytoKeys 265: 147-159, DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.265.162769AbstractDorobaea linearifolia Montesinos & Pruski (Asteraceae, Senecioneae) is described as a new species from the humid subtropical montane forests of central Peru, specifically from the eastern slopes of the Andes in the Huánuco Region. The species is distinguished by its narrowly linear to very narrowly oblanceolate leaves, solitary terminal capitula, and glabrous habit. Its morphological affinities are briefly discussed in comparison with allied taxa in Dorobaea and related genera, images and a table of main character differences are also added. A preliminary conservation assessment, following IUCN Red List criteria, suggests the species should be considered Endangered (EN) B 1 ab (iii) due to its restricted distribution and ongoing habitat degradation.
DOI: 10.15468/y5dbke
title: Gastrochilus jiuzhaigouensis (Orchidaceae, Epidendroideae), a new epiphytic orchid from Jiuzhaigou World Heritage Site, China

description: This dataset contains the digitized treatments in Plazi based on the original journal article Zhu, Da-Lin, Zhang, Jun-Yi, Zhang, Yue, Liao, Min, He, Hai, Chen, Ke, Xu, Bo (2025): Gastrochilus jiuzhaigouensis (Orchidaceae, Epidendroideae), a new epiphytic orchid from Jiuzhaigou World Heritage Site, China. PhytoKeys 265: 25-38, DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.265.159138AbstractGastrochilus jiuzhaigouensis (Orchidaceae), a new orchid species epiphytic on tree branches on the bank of an alpine lake at the famous Jiuzhaigou National Park in China, is described and illustrated. It differs from its morphologically similar species, G. bernhardtianus, by its shorter stems, obliquely linear-lanceolate leaves, reniform and revolute epichile without ornamentation, and the absence of a middle ridge at central callus of the epichile. To test its species status, sequences of the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (nrITS) and four chloroplast DNA markers (matK, psbA-trnH, psbM-trnD, and trnL-F) were newly generated. Molecular phylogenetic analyses including 53 accessions of Gastrochilus species resolved it within the same clade as G. bernhardtianus, but with distinct boundary. Both morphological differences and phylogenetic evidence supported it a species new to science.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18082267
title: Table 1 in A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth

description: Table 1. Tyrannosaur specimens used in this studyı with specimen numbers and colloquial names given.
Specimen% BonesScanningCM 9380 "Carnegie"11LiDAR scan of mounted specimenFMNH PR 2081 "Sue"73LiDAR scan of mounted specimenı CTs of limb castsBHI 3033 "Stan"63LiDAR scan of castMOR 555 "MOR"49LiDAR scan of cast; limb bones point digitized at MORBMR P2002.4.1 "Jane"52LiDAR scan of cast
Bones’’ indicates the estimated percentage of bones (by number) preservedı from N Larson (2008). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026037.t001
description: Published as part of John R. Hutchinson, Karl T. Bates, Julia Molnar, Vivian Allen & Peter J. Makovicky, 2011, A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth, pp. 2 in PLoS ONE (e 26037) 6 (10) on page 2, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026037, http://zenodo.org/record/3890538
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18082268
title: Table 1 in A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth

description: Table 1. Tyrannosaur specimens used in this studyı with specimen numbers and colloquial names given.
Specimen% BonesScanningCM 9380 "Carnegie"11LiDAR scan of mounted specimenFMNH PR 2081 "Sue"73LiDAR scan of mounted specimenı CTs of limb castsBHI 3033 "Stan"63LiDAR scan of castMOR 555 "MOR"49LiDAR scan of cast; limb bones point digitized at MORBMR P2002.4.1 "Jane"52LiDAR scan of cast
Bones’’ indicates the estimated percentage of bones (by number) preservedı from N Larson (2008). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026037.t001
description: Published as part of John R. Hutchinson, Karl T. Bates, Julia Molnar, Vivian Allen & Peter J. Makovicky, 2011, A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth, pp. 2 in PLoS ONE (e 26037) 6 (10) on page 2, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026037, http://zenodo.org/record/3890538
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18082272
title: Table 2 in A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth

description: Table 2. Bone dimensions for the five tyrannosaur specimens.
SpecimenSegmentVolume (m3)Femur/ Tibiotarsus Volume (m3)CarnegieFemur0.04300.98Tibiotarsus0.0438Tarsomet0.0176SueFemur0.04401.39Tibiotarsus0.0316Tarsomet0.0137StanFemur0.03401.43Tibiotarsus0.0238Tarsomet0.0140MORFemur0.03011.05Tibiotarsus0.0288Tarsomet0.0139JaneFemur0.006001.39Tibiotarsus0.00433Tarsomet0.00156
The ‘‘tibiotarsus’’ includes tibiaı fibula and proximal tarsals. The ‘‘tarsomet’’ includes all mounted metatarsalsı except in the case of the Sue and Carnegie specimen scans which lack the small first digit and fifth metatarsal. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026037.t002
description: Published as part of John R. Hutchinson, Karl T. Bates, Julia Molnar, Vivian Allen & Peter J. Makovicky, 2011, A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth, pp. 4 in PLoS ONE (e 26037) 6 (10) on page 4, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026037, http://zenodo.org/record/3890538
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18082271
title: Table 2 in A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth

description: Table 2. Bone dimensions for the five tyrannosaur specimens.
SpecimenSegmentVolume (m3)Femur/ Tibiotarsus Volume (m3)CarnegieFemur0.04300.98Tibiotarsus0.0438Tarsomet0.0176SueFemur0.04401.39Tibiotarsus0.0316Tarsomet0.0137StanFemur0.03401.43Tibiotarsus0.0238Tarsomet0.0140MORFemur0.03011.05Tibiotarsus0.0288Tarsomet0.0139JaneFemur0.006001.39Tibiotarsus0.00433Tarsomet0.00156
The ‘‘tibiotarsus’’ includes tibiaı fibula and proximal tarsals. The ‘‘tarsomet’’ includes all mounted metatarsalsı except in the case of the Sue and Carnegie specimen scans which lack the small first digit and fifth metatarsal. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026037.t002
description: Published as part of John R. Hutchinson, Karl T. Bates, Julia Molnar, Vivian Allen & Peter J. Makovicky, 2011, A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth, pp. 4 in PLoS ONE (e 26037) 6 (10) on page 4, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026037, http://zenodo.org/record/3890538
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18082274
title: Table 3 in A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth

description: Table 3. Skeletal dimensions as explained in the text.
SpecimenFemoral LengthBody LengthGAD/Body LengthLeg LengthTail/Body LengthCarnegie1.26511.880.2123.0400.470*Sue1.31212.290.2253.3000.512Stan1.27811.780.2113.0680.594MOR1.28011.600.157*3.0550.551Jane0.7886.4520.1782.1250.599
All units are in meters (except for ratios). GAD’’ is gleno-acetabular distance. The asterisk marks specimen measurements with unusual values relative to other specimensı discussed in the text. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026037.t003
description: Published as part of John R. Hutchinson, Karl T. Bates, Julia Molnar, Vivian Allen & Peter J. Makovicky, 2011, A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth, pp. 4 in PLoS ONE (e 26037) 6 (10) on page 4, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026037, http://zenodo.org/record/3890538
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18082275
title: Table 3 in A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth

description: Table 3. Skeletal dimensions as explained in the text.
SpecimenFemoral LengthBody LengthGAD/Body LengthLeg LengthTail/Body LengthCarnegie1.26511.880.2123.0400.470*Sue1.31212.290.2253.3000.512Stan1.27811.780.2113.0680.594MOR1.28011.600.157*3.0550.551Jane0.7886.4520.1782.1250.599
All units are in meters (except for ratios). GAD’’ is gleno-acetabular distance. The asterisk marks specimen measurements with unusual values relative to other specimensı discussed in the text. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026037.t003
description: Published as part of John R. Hutchinson, Karl T. Bates, Julia Molnar, Vivian Allen & Peter J. Makovicky, 2011, A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth, pp. 4 in PLoS ONE (e 26037) 6 (10) on page 4, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026037, http://zenodo.org/record/3890538
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18082278
title: Table 4 in A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth

description: Table 4. Body segment masses for the five tyrannosaur specimens.
SpecimenSegmentModelMass (kg)Mass/Body MassMax/MinCarnegieHeadall3900.053SueHeadall3920.041StanHeadall3830.065MORHeadall6400.111JaneHeadall370.058CarnegieNeckmin3650.049SueNeckmin5040.053StanNeckmin1900.032MORNeckmin4210.073JaneNeckmin300.046CarnegieNeckmax6750.0461.85SueNeckmax7370.0401.46StanNeckmax5190.0482.74MORNeckmax10050.0932.39JaneNeckmax750.0582.53CarnegieBodymin42710.578SueBodymin55600.585StanBodymin32140.542MORBodymin20390.353JaneBodymin3270.512CarnegieBodymax86060.5912.01SueBodymax100110.5411.80StanBodymax52690.4861.64MORBodymax35970.3341.76JaneBodymax5420.4201.66CarnegieTailmin8580.116SueTailmin11710.123StanTailmin5870.099MORTailmin11960.207JaneTailmin740.115CarnegieTailmax23830.1642.78SueTailmax34770.1882.97StanTailmax12900.1192.20MORTailmax23750.2211.99JaneTailmax1680.1302.28
Results for our minimal (‘‘min’’) and maximal (‘‘max’’) models are shown. Also displayed are segment percentages of body mass (‘‘Mass/body mass’’; for minimal or maximal models respectively; for head segment data are shown relative to minimal models) and the ratio of segment masses for maximal vs. minimal models (‘‘Max/Min’’). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026037.t004
description: Published as part of John R. Hutchinson, Karl T. Bates, Julia Molnar, Vivian Allen & Peter J. Makovicky, 2011, A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth, pp. 8 in PLoS ONE (e 26037) 6 (10) on page 8, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026037, http://zenodo.org/record/3890538
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18082279
title: Table 4 in A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth

description: Table 4. Body segment masses for the five tyrannosaur specimens.
SpecimenSegmentModelMass (kg)Mass/Body MassMax/MinCarnegieHeadall3900.053SueHeadall3920.041StanHeadall3830.065MORHeadall6400.111JaneHeadall370.058CarnegieNeckmin3650.049SueNeckmin5040.053StanNeckmin1900.032MORNeckmin4210.073JaneNeckmin300.046CarnegieNeckmax6750.0461.85SueNeckmax7370.0401.46StanNeckmax5190.0482.74MORNeckmax10050.0932.39JaneNeckmax750.0582.53CarnegieBodymin42710.578SueBodymin55600.585StanBodymin32140.542MORBodymin20390.353JaneBodymin3270.512CarnegieBodymax86060.5912.01SueBodymax100110.5411.80StanBodymax52690.4861.64MORBodymax35970.3341.76JaneBodymax5420.4201.66CarnegieTailmin8580.116SueTailmin11710.123StanTailmin5870.099MORTailmin11960.207JaneTailmin740.115CarnegieTailmax23830.1642.78SueTailmax34770.1882.97StanTailmax12900.1192.20MORTailmax23750.2211.99JaneTailmax1680.1302.28
Results for our minimal (‘‘min’’) and maximal (‘‘max’’) models are shown. Also displayed are segment percentages of body mass (‘‘Mass/body mass’’; for minimal or maximal models respectively; for head segment data are shown relative to minimal models) and the ratio of segment masses for maximal vs. minimal models (‘‘Max/Min’’). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026037.t004
description: Published as part of John R. Hutchinson, Karl T. Bates, Julia Molnar, Vivian Allen & Peter J. Makovicky, 2011, A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth, pp. 8 in PLoS ONE (e 26037) 6 (10) on page 8, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026037, http://zenodo.org/record/3890538
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18082281
title: Table 5 in A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth

description: Table 5. Limb segment masses for the five tyrannosaur specimens.
SpecimenSegmentModelMass (kg)Mass/ body massMax/MinCarnegieForelimball130.002SueForelimball110.001StanForelimball210.004MORForelimball180.003JaneForelimball180.028CarnegieThighmin9350.126SueThighmin12870.135StanThighmin10260.173MORThighmin10080.174JaneThighmin990.155CarnegieThighmax14520.1001.55SueThighmax26760.1452.08StanThighmax22860.2112.23MORThighmax21970.2042.18JaneThighmax2770.2152.80CarnegieShankmin4100.055SueShankmin4070.043StanShankmin3420.058MORShankmin3260.056JaneShankmin380.059CarnegieShankmax8350.0572.04SueShankmax8290.0452.04StanShankmax7660.0712.24MORShankmax7140.0662.19JaneShankmax1100.0872.92CarnegieFootmin1530.021SueFootmin1230.013StanFootmin1710.029MORFootmin1290.022JaneFootmin170.026CarnegieFootmax2090.0141.37SueFootmax1960.0111.59StanFootmax3000.0281.75MORFootmax2220.0211.72JaneFootmax410.0322.48
Format as in Table 4. The ‘‘foot’’ segment represents the distal tarsals (when present)ı metatarsus and all preserved digits. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026037.t005
description: Published as part of John R. Hutchinson, Karl T. Bates, Julia Molnar, Vivian Allen & Peter J. Makovicky, 2011, A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth, pp. 8 in PLoS ONE (e 26037) 6 (10) on page 8, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026037, http://zenodo.org/record/3890538
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18082282
title: Table 5 in A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth

description: Table 5. Limb segment masses for the five tyrannosaur specimens.
SpecimenSegmentModelMass (kg)Mass/ body massMax/MinCarnegieForelimball130.002SueForelimball110.001StanForelimball210.004MORForelimball180.003JaneForelimball180.028CarnegieThighmin9350.126SueThighmin12870.135StanThighmin10260.173MORThighmin10080.174JaneThighmin990.155CarnegieThighmax14520.1001.55SueThighmax26760.1452.08StanThighmax22860.2112.23MORThighmax21970.2042.18JaneThighmax2770.2152.80CarnegieShankmin4100.055SueShankmin4070.043StanShankmin3420.058MORShankmin3260.056JaneShankmin380.059CarnegieShankmax8350.0572.04SueShankmax8290.0452.04StanShankmax7660.0712.24MORShankmax7140.0662.19JaneShankmax1100.0872.92CarnegieFootmin1530.021SueFootmin1230.013StanFootmin1710.029MORFootmin1290.022JaneFootmin170.026CarnegieFootmax2090.0141.37SueFootmax1960.0111.59StanFootmax3000.0281.75MORFootmax2220.0211.72JaneFootmax410.0322.48
Format as in Table 4. The ‘‘foot’’ segment represents the distal tarsals (when present)ı metatarsus and all preserved digits. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026037.t005
description: Published as part of John R. Hutchinson, Karl T. Bates, Julia Molnar, Vivian Allen & Peter J. Makovicky, 2011, A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth, pp. 8 in PLoS ONE (e 26037) 6 (10) on page 8, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026037, http://zenodo.org/record/3890538
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18082283
title: Table 6 in A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth

description: Table 6. Body mass (all segments) and center of mass (COM) values shown for the five tyrannosaur specimens.
SpecimenMin mass (kg)COM x (m)COM y (m)Max mass (kg)COM x (m)COM y (m)Average mass (kg)Mass rangeCarnegie73940.549‾0.332145640.376‾0.34790811.97Sue95020.801‾0.355184890.572‾0.356139961.95Stan59340.524‾0.495108370.504‾0.52183851.83MOR57770.572‾0.337107680.386‾0.38782721.86Jane6390.276‾0.31812690.242‾0.3079541.98
Shown are COM positions (relative to the right hip joint; cranial = +x; ventral = ‾y) for our minimal (‘‘Min’’) and maximal (‘‘Max’’) modelsı with averages of minimal and maximal model body masses as well as the ratio of maximal to minimal masses (‘‘Mass range’’). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026037.t006
description: Published as part of John R. Hutchinson, Karl T. Bates, Julia Molnar, Vivian Allen & Peter J. Makovicky, 2011, A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth, pp. 9 in PLoS ONE (e 26037) 6 (10) on page 9, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026037, http://zenodo.org/record/3890538
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18082284
title: Table 6 in A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth

description: Table 6. Body mass (all segments) and center of mass (COM) values shown for the five tyrannosaur specimens.
SpecimenMin mass (kg)COM x (m)COM y (m)Max mass (kg)COM x (m)COM y (m)Average mass (kg)Mass rangeCarnegie73940.549‾0.332145640.376‾0.34790811.97Sue95020.801‾0.355184890.572‾0.356139961.95Stan59340.524‾0.495108370.504‾0.52183851.83MOR57770.572‾0.337107680.386‾0.38782721.86Jane6390.276‾0.31812690.242‾0.3079541.98
Shown are COM positions (relative to the right hip joint; cranial = +x; ventral = ‾y) for our minimal (‘‘Min’’) and maximal (‘‘Max’’) modelsı with averages of minimal and maximal model body masses as well as the ratio of maximal to minimal masses (‘‘Mass range’’). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026037.t006
description: Published as part of John R. Hutchinson, Karl T. Bates, Julia Molnar, Vivian Allen & Peter J. Makovicky, 2011, A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth, pp. 9 in PLoS ONE (e 26037) 6 (10) on page 9, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026037, http://zenodo.org/record/3890538
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18082286
title: Table 7 in A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth

description: Table 7. Whole body masses and center of mass (COM) positions for the five tyrannosaur specimens.
ZBody mass (kg)COM distance from hip (m)COM (% Femoral length)COM (% Body length)COM (% GAD)COM (% Leg length)XYXYXYXYXYCarnegieMost Cranial118800.827‾0.27565.4‾21.77.0‾2.333.2‾11.127.2‾9.0Most Caudal10390‾0.024‾0.395‾1.90‾31.2‾0.20‾3.3‾1.00‾15.9‾0.8‾13.0Most Dorsal134050.428‾0.30033.8‾23.73.6‾2.517.2‾12.114.1‾9.9Most Ventral88880.447‾0.38835.3‾30.73.8‾3.318.0‾15.614.7‾12.8Maximal145640.376‾0.34729.7‾27.43.2‾2.915.1‾13.912.4‾11.4Minimal73940.549‾0.33243.4‾26.24.6‾2.822.1‾13.318.1‾10.9SueMost Cranial143001.160‾0.36191.2‾25.59.7‾2.743.2‾12.136.3‾10.2Most Caudal136910.116‾0.35013.6‾24.71.4‾2.66.40‾11.75.4‾9.8Most Dorsal166050.641‾0.35851.5‾25.45.5‾2.724.4‾12.020.5‾10.1Most Ventral113860.662‾0.35255.5‾24.85.9‾2.626.3‾11.722.1‾9.8Maximal184890.572‾0.35646.0‾24.94.9‾2.721.8‾11.818.3‾9.9Minimal95020.801‾0.35566.8‾25.57.1‾2.731.7‾12.126.6‾10.2StanMost Cranial83190.869‾0.51168.0‾40.07.4‾4.334.9‾20.628.3‾16.7Most Caudal84500.154‾0.60212.1‾47.11.3‾5.16.20‾24.25.0‾19.6Most Dorsal90230.622‾0.48848.6‾38.25.3‾4.125.0‾19.620.3‾15.9Most Ventral77460.378‾0.63729.5‾49.93.2‾5.415.2‾25.612.3‾20.8Maximal108370.504‾0.52139.4‾40.84.3‾4.420.3‾20.916.4‾17.0Minimal59340.524‾0.49541.0‾38.74.4‾4.221.1‾19.917.1‾16.1MORMost Cranial79180.881‾0.27968.8‾21.87.6‾2.448.3‾15.328.8‾9.1Most Caudal86260.056‾0.4534.40‾35.40.5‾3.93.1‾24.81.8‾14.8Most Dorsal90980.511‾0.32139.9‾25.14.4‾2.828.0‾17.616.7‾10.5Most Ventral74470.378‾0.42829.5‾33.53.3‾3.720.7‾23.512.4‾14.0Maximal107680.386‾0.38730.2‾30.23.3‾3.321.2‾21.212.6‾12.7Minimal57770.572‾0.33744.7‾26.34.9‾2.931.4‾18.518.7‾11.0JaneMost Cranial9750.428‾0.28654.4‾36.36.6‾4.437.3‾24.920.2‾13.5Most Caudal10090.080‾0.39710.2‾50.41.2‾6.27.0‾34.63.8‾18.7Most Dorsal10690.298‾0.27237.8‾34.54.6‾4.226.0‾23.714.0‾12.8Most Ventral9150.192‾0.42324.4‾53.73.0‾6.616.8‾36.99.1‾19.9Maximal12690.240‾0.29430.5‾37.33.7‾4.620.9‾25.611.3‾13.8Minimal6390.276‾0.31835.0‾40.34.3‾4.924.0‾27.713.0‾15.0
Body massı absolute COM positionı and COM position are shown; the latter is normalized by four alternative metrics: femur lengthı body lengthı gleno-acetabular distance (GAD)ı and limb length (data from Table 3). The six models represented for each specimen are four variants maximizing the cranialı caudalı dorsal and ventral COM extreme positionsı and the minimal and maximal mass models. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026037.t007
description: Published as part of John R. Hutchinson, Karl T. Bates, Julia Molnar, Vivian Allen & Peter J. Makovicky, 2011, A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth, pp. 10 in PLoS ONE (e 26037) 6 (10) on page 10, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026037, http://zenodo.org/record/3890538