cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1186832.v12
title: Journal subscription costs - FOIs to UK universities

description: This dataset contains the amount of money paid by UK higher education institutions to seven major publishers (Elsevier, Wiley, Springer, Taylor & Francis, Sage, Oxford University Press, and Cambridge University Press) for academic journals from 2010-14. The data was obtained by sending FOI requests to each institution through the website whatdotheyknow.com These are seven of the largest academic publishers but do not represent the total spend of these institutions on academic journals. Please see the F1000 data note (http://f1000research.com/articles/3-274/v1) for a full description of the data collection process. <strong>UPDATE 08/10/2014</strong>: Added figures for 13 more institutions. <strong>UPDATE 22/10/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to Elsevier journals. Also includes additional figures for other publishers for 16 institutions. <strong>UPDATE 24/10/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to Elsevier journals for 13 more institutions. <strong>UPDATE 27/10/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to Elsevier journals for 5 more institutions. <strong>UPDATE 29/10/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to Elsevier journals for 25 more institutions. <strong>UPDATE 5/11/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to Elsevier journals for 14 more institutions. <strong>UPDATE 25/11/2014</strong>: Added figures for Wiley, Springer, and OUP for 20 Russell Group institutions from Michelle Brook's FOI data (http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1250073) as well as further figures for around 20 other institutions. <strong>UPDATE 03/12/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to various publishers for 13 institutions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1185742
title: LAB3: Week 3 Field Training

description: On 9/23/14, at approximately 2:51-3:50PM, with a weather report of 21 degrees Celsius and clear skies, at Saywell Woodlot located at York University (43° 46' 9.228"N, 79° 30' 29.556’’W), 10 pairs of adult trees located within 1ft of a 100ft transect were selected and observed. Walking from the edge of the woodlot to the center, at a relatively straight line, each tree was measured for diameter at breast height (ft), distance from the first tree to the next closest point on the following tree, and so forth for each pair, and overall condition. Before sampling each tree, they were judged based upon height (whether it was or was not over 12.0ft tall in order to be classified as an adult tree) and type of tree (only measured Trembling Aspen trees and Balsam Widow trees to maintain simplicity). The equipment used in this observation were 2 transect measuring tapes as well as pen and paper to record.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1185744.v1
title: Ecology Lab 2

description: The silver maple trees were measured in York University's Danby Woodlot.The diameter of each adult silver maple tree trunks were measured at chest height and in cm using a transect measuring tape. The canopy coverage percentage was estimated by making a square with your fingers and holding it up to estimate how much sky is seen through the leaves of the adult maple measured. The distance from one adult silver maple to the nearest silver maple sapling was measured in cm using a transect measuring tape. The diamer of the silver maple sapling was also measured in cm. There is a total of 10 silver maple adult trees and 10 saplings that were measured. The silver maple saplings were estimated as less than the average height.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1185763.v3
title: WK3 Experiment 1: Woodlot, Dataset 4

description: Method: Beginning with two 100ft transects in the middle of Saywell Woodlot at York University. From the path that runs through the center of the woodlot, scouted an area with a fair amount of trees if one were to walk in a straight line away from the path. Unravelled one of the transects and walked a relatively straight line from the path through a moderately dense area of trees. At intervals of about 8ft, selected a suitable adult balsam widow and, using the other transect, measured its trunk diameter at breast height(approximately 4ft 10in from the ground). Proceeded to find the nearest balsam widow sapling and measure the diameter of the trunk and the distance between the sapling and adult trees at the same height. For canopy coverage a makeshift square was created with experimenter's hands and raised to the sky while standing about 1.5ft from the adult tree. Canopy coverage was then estimated based on the ratio of leaves and branches to the sky that could be seen in the makeshift square. This process was then repeated at apporximately 8ft intervals until data was collected on 10 pairs of adult balsam widows and balsam widow saplings.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1185741
title: Lab Number 2, Quadrat Data Recordings In Danby Woods at York University

description: The group consisting of Martina, Jessie, Mark, Patrick, and David were supplied with a quadrat from the TA Taylor Noble. With this quadrat, the group went to the field to the south of Danby Woods at York University, and at random would put down the quadrat and make the following observations: Total Plants, Total Species, Percent Vegetation, and Percent Grass. They would repeat doing so, again placing the quadrat in a different random place in the field, for 7 trials. This experiment was done on Tuesday, September 23rd, from around 2:45-3:15 pm.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1185740
title: Total Plants, Species, Percent Vegetation and Percent Grass Data Collected at Random in Danby Woods at York University.

description: The group of Martina, Jessie, Mark, David and Patrick had a quadrat supplied by the TA Taylor Noble. The group went to a field to the south of Danby Woods on Tuesday, September 23rd from approximately 2:45 pm to 3:15 pm, and placed the quadrat down in completely random places seven times. Then, the following data was recorded within each quadrat: Total Plants, Total Species, Percent Vegetation, and Percent Grass.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1185742.v1
title: LAB3: Week 3 Field Training

description: On 9/23/14, at approximately 2:51-3:50PM, with a weather report of 21 degrees Celsius and clear skies, at Saywell Woodlot located at York University (43° 46' 9.228"N, 79° 30' 29.556’’W), 10 pairs of adult trees located within 1ft of a 100ft transect were selected and observed. Walking from the edge of the woodlot to the center, at a relatively straight line, each tree was measured for diameter at breast height (ft), distance from the first tree to the next closest point on the following tree, and so forth for each pair, and overall condition. Before sampling each tree, they were judged based upon height (whether it was or was not over 12.0ft tall in order to be classified as an adult tree) and type of tree (only measured Trembling Aspen trees and Balsam Widow trees to maintain simplicity). The equipment used in this observation were 2 transect measuring tapes as well as pen and paper to record.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1186832.v13
title: Journal subscription costs - FOIs to UK universities

description: This dataset contains the amount of money paid by UK higher education institutions to seven major publishers (Elsevier, Wiley, Springer, Taylor & Francis, Sage, Oxford University Press, and Cambridge University Press) for academic journals from 2010-14. The data was obtained by sending FOI requests to each institution through the website whatdotheyknow.com These are seven of the largest academic publishers but do not represent the total spend of these institutions on academic journals. Please see the F1000 data note (http://f1000research.com/articles/3-274/v1) for a full description of the data collection process. <strong>UPDATE 08/10/2014</strong>: Added figures for 13 more institutions. <strong>UPDATE 22/10/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to Elsevier journals. Also includes additional figures for other publishers for 16 institutions. <strong>UPDATE 24/10/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to Elsevier journals for 13 more institutions. <strong>UPDATE 27/10/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to Elsevier journals for 5 more institutions. <strong>UPDATE 29/10/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to Elsevier journals for 25 more institutions. <strong>UPDATE 5/11/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to Elsevier journals for 14 more institutions. <strong>UPDATE 25/11/2014</strong>: Added figures for Wiley, Springer, and OUP for 20 Russell Group institutions from Michelle Brook's FOI data (http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1250073) as well as further figures for around 20 other institutions. <strong>UPDATE 03/12/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to various publishers for 13 institutions. <strong>UPDATE 09/12/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to various publishers for 15 institutions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1185740.v1
title: Total Plants, Species, Percent Vegetation and Percent Grass Data Collected at Random in Danby Woods at York University.

description: The group of Martina, Jessie, Mark, David and Patrick had a quadrat supplied by the TA Taylor Noble. The group went to a field to the south of Danby Woods on Tuesday, September 23rd from approximately 2:45 pm to 3:15 pm, and placed the quadrat down in completely random places seven times. Then, the following data was recorded within each quadrat: Total Plants, Total Species, Percent Vegetation, and Percent Grass.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1185741.v1
title: Lab Number 2, Quadrat Data Recordings In Danby Woods at York University

description: The group consisting of Martina, Jessie, Mark, Patrick, and David were supplied with a quadrat from the TA Taylor Noble. With this quadrat, the group went to the field to the south of Danby Woods at York University, and at random would put down the quadrat and make the following observations: Total Plants, Total Species, Percent Vegetation, and Percent Grass. They would repeat doing so, again placing the quadrat in a different random place in the field, for 7 trials. This experiment was done on Tuesday, September 23rd, from around 2:45-3:15 pm.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1185734
title: Cumulative PLOS ALM Report - December 2013

description: The PLOS ALM report contains the cumulative stats through December 2013.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1185736
title: Physical Traits of 10 Pairs of Trees at Saywell Woodlot

description: The physical traits of 10 pairs of adult trees in the Saywell Woodlot at York University were measured on September 23, 2014 between 2:30PM and 5:30 PM. At that point in time, the outdoor temperature averaged 20ᵒC. A 100 foot transect was laid at the North edge of the main path on a Northward axis for the first 4 pairs of adult trees. For the final 6 pairs of adult trees, a 100 foot transect was laid at the South edge of the same main path on a Southward axis. Each time an adult tree came within 2 feet of the transect, it was chosen for measuring. A tree was determined to be an adult if it was at least twice the height of the experimenter. The experimenter measured 67 inches tall and classification of an adult was determined by visual observation. A second transect was used in determining if an adult tree came within 2 feet of the first transect at breast height (67 inch experimenter). This distance was measured perpendicular to the first transect, directly to the closest point of the adult tree. For each of the chosen trees, distance to the nearest adult tree, diameter, and condition of the tree were recorded. All measurements were made in inches using a transect, rounded to the nearest integer.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1185737
title: BIOL2050 lab 2 - Davidson

description: To my TA
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1185736.v1
title: Physical Traits of 10 Pairs of Trees at Saywell Woodlot

description: The physical traits of 10 pairs of adult trees in the Saywell Woodlot at York University were measured on September 23, 2014 between 2:30PM and 5:30 PM. At that point in time, the outdoor temperature averaged 20ᵒC. A 100 foot transect was laid at the North edge of the main path on a Northward axis for the first 4 pairs of adult trees. For the final 6 pairs of adult trees, a 100 foot transect was laid at the South edge of the same main path on a Southward axis. Each time an adult tree came within 2 feet of the transect, it was chosen for measuring. A tree was determined to be an adult if it was at least twice the height of the experimenter. The experimenter measured 67 inches tall and classification of an adult was determined by visual observation. A second transect was used in determining if an adult tree came within 2 feet of the first transect at breast height (67 inch experimenter). This distance was measured perpendicular to the first transect, directly to the closest point of the adult tree. For each of the chosen trees, distance to the nearest adult tree, diameter, and condition of the tree were recorded. All measurements were made in inches using a transect, rounded to the nearest integer.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1185737.v1
title: BIOL2050 lab 2 - Davidson

description: To my TA
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1186832.v14
title: Journal subscription costs - FOIs to UK universities

description: This dataset contains the amount of money paid by UK higher education institutions to seven major publishers (Elsevier, Wiley, Springer, Taylor & Francis, Sage, Oxford University Press, and Cambridge University Press) for academic journals from 2010-14. The data was obtained by sending FOI requests to each institution through the website whatdotheyknow.com. It now represents nearly £400m of expenditure. These are seven of the largest academic publishers but do not represent the total spend of these institutions on academic journals. Please see the F1000 data note (http://f1000research.com/articles/3-274/v1) for a full description of the data collection process. <strong>UPDATE 08/10/2014</strong>: Added figures for 13 more institutions. <strong>UPDATE 22/10/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to Elsevier journals. Also includes additional figures for other publishers for 16 institutions. <strong>UPDATE 24/10/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to Elsevier journals for 13 more institutions. <strong>UPDATE 27/10/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to Elsevier journals for 5 more institutions. <strong>UPDATE 29/10/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to Elsevier journals for 25 more institutions. <strong>UPDATE 5/11/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to Elsevier journals for 14 more institutions. <strong>UPDATE 25/11/2014</strong>: Added figures for Wiley, Springer, and OUP for 20 Russell Group institutions from Michelle Brook's FOI data (http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1250073) as well as further figures for around 20 other institutions. <strong>UPDATE 03/12/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to various publishers for 13 institutions. <strong>UPDATE 09/12/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to various publishers for 15 institutions. <strong>UPDATE 23/12/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to various publishers for 12 institutions. <strong>Note on the data 16/01/2015</strong>: It has been brought to my attention that the way I have added VAT to some figures may not be 100% accurate. I have added VAT to those figures for which it was not provided (a minority), but since VAT is only applied to electronic and not print publications in the UK, the figures I have added may not be completely accurate. Electronic subscriptions make up the majority of journal expenditure now but not all of it. Please bear this is mind when directly comparing different institutions' figures. I will see revisit the data at some point to see if I can rectify the problem.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1185734.v1
title: Cumulative PLOS ALM Report - September 2012

description: The PLOS ALM report contains the cumulative stats through October 10, 2012.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1186832.v15
title: Journal subscription costs - FOIs to UK universities

description: This dataset contains the amount of money paid by UK higher education institutions to seven major publishers (Elsevier, Wiley, Springer, Taylor & Francis, Sage, Oxford University Press, and Cambridge University Press) for academic journals from 2010-14. The data was obtained by sending FOI requests to each institution through the website whatdotheyknow.com. It now represents nearly £400m of expenditure. These are seven of the largest academic publishers but do not represent the total spend of these institutions on academic journals. Please see the F1000 data note (http://f1000research.com/articles/3-274/v1) for a full description of the data collection process. <strong>UPDATE 08/10/2014</strong>: Added figures for 13 more institutions. <strong>UPDATE 22/10/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to Elsevier journals. Also includes additional figures for other publishers for 16 institutions. <strong>UPDATE 24/10/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to Elsevier journals for 13 more institutions. <strong>UPDATE 27/10/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to Elsevier journals for 5 more institutions. <strong>UPDATE 29/10/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to Elsevier journals for 25 more institutions. <strong>UPDATE 5/11/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to Elsevier journals for 14 more institutions. <strong>UPDATE 25/11/2014</strong>: Added figures for Wiley, Springer, and OUP for 20 Russell Group institutions from Michelle Brook's FOI data (http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1250073) as well as further figures for around 20 other institutions. <strong>UPDATE 03/12/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to various publishers for 13 institutions. <strong>UPDATE 09/12/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to various publishers for 15 institutions. <strong>UPDATE 23/12/2014</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to various publishers for 12 institutions. <strong>Note on the data 16/01/2015</strong>: It has been brought to my attention that the way I have added VAT to some figures may not be 100% accurate. I have added VAT to those figures for which it was not provided (a minority), but since VAT is only applied to electronic and not print publications in the UK, the figures I have added may not be completely accurate. Electronic subscriptions make up the majority of journal expenditure now but not all of it. Please bear this is mind when directly comparing different institutions' figures. I will see revisit the data at some point to see if I can rectify the problem. <strong>UPDATE 22/01/2015</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to various publishers for 16 institutions. <strong>UPDATE 20/03/2015</strong>: Added figures for subscriptions to various publishers for 16 institutions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1185724
title: Woodland 2 data set

description: We observed 10 different trees from same elm tree species, at York university campus woodlot at around 3:35 pm. During the observation we recorded the diameter at breast height (dbh) of each of the 10 different tree in meter by using the transect measuring tape. And we estimated the extent of canopy covered by each tree by making a square with our fingers and holding them up toward the sky to see how much the tree covered the sky. The amount of canopy of the tree was measured in percentage, based on our individual observation, where lower percentage represented lower coverage from the tree and higher percentage indicating higher coverage from the tree. In addition, we measured the nearest distance and diameter at breast height of the sapling of the same specie of the elm tree for each of the 10 trees in meters using the transect measuring tape.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1185734.v3
title: Cumulative PLOS ALM Report - December 2013

description: The PLOS ALM report contains the cumulative stats through December 2013.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1185724.v1
title: Woodland 2 data set

description: We observed 10 different trees from same elm tree species, at York university campus woodlot at around 3:35 pm. During the observation we recorded the diameter at breast height (dbh) of each of the 10 different tree in meter by using the transect measuring tape. And we estimated the extent of canopy covered by each tree by making a square with our fingers and holding them up toward the sky to see how much the tree covered the sky. The amount of canopy of the tree was measured in percentage, based on our individual observation, where lower percentage represented lower coverage from the tree and higher percentage indicating higher coverage from the tree. In addition, we measured the nearest distance and diameter at breast height of the sapling of the same specie of the elm tree for each of the 10 trees in meters using the transect measuring tape.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1185734.v2
title: Cumulative PLOS ALM Report - August 2014

description: The PLOS ALM report contains the cumulative stats through August 2014.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1185721
title: BIOL 2050- LAB 2

description: Data was collected on September 24, 2014 at a grassland on the York University Keele Campus. The species <em>Cnicus vulgare</em> (or the Common Thistle) was observed on a single transect line in the grassland. The transect line was placed randomly in the grassland and a person walked along the line to observe the abundance of plant species, and to identify the chosen species. The sample size was 20 individuals. Every objective plant spotted was numbered off randomly and observed in its position on the transect line, and its traits were recorded. These traits include the height of the plant in centimeters, the position or distance within the 20 meters of the transect line, the number of flowers which could be observed, the number of leaves which could be observed, and the level of crowding. These steps were repeated 20 times for each individual plant that was observed, and the data was recorded.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1185723
title: Review materials for Tressoldi et al 2014, version 2

description: Supplementary materials for my review of Tressoldi et al. 2014. "Brain-to-Brain (mind-to-mind) interaction at distance: a confirmatory study" version 2. StimulusTimecourses.png: Stimulus time courses were extracted from coincidences data files. Each row corresponds to the stimulus time course for one of the 20 pairs of participants. Upwards bumps in these plots indicate stimulus (signal) periods, the rest are baseline (silence) periods. The strong correlation between the different stimulus protocols is immediately obvious. For the majority (13) of pairs the first stimulus occurred after one minute. For the remainder (7) the first stimulus occurred after 2 minutes. In addition to the high predictability of these time courses, this plot also demonstrates that the intial silence period was not randomized to be 1, 2, or 3 minutes as claimed in the manuscript, but simply either 1 or 2 minutes. TemporalCorrelations.png: Temporal correlations between raw data randomly sampled into 50% training and 50% testing samples as done in the analysis by Tressoldi et al. Each panel shows a 2D density histogram. Hotter colours indicate a greater frequency of data points clustering in that location. These plots compare the randomly assigned "training samples" (x-axis) to the remaining "testing samples" (y-axis). The four columns correspond to EEG channels 1-4. The four rows are four repetitions in which a new set of training/test samples have been assigned randomly. For most plots the strong correlation between the randomly assigned samples is evident even on visual inspection. Even for the plots that seem to show less of a correlation (e.g. the fourth column) the Pearson's correlation is extremely significant. It should not be surprising that a powerful classifier can exploit such correlations to decode arbitrary stimulus labels provided the stimulus labels aren't too high frequency.