DOI: 10.14457/tu.the.2014.590
title: Legal problems on commercial surrogacy in Thailand under the protection of children born from assisted reproductive technologies act, B.E. 2558

description: Thailand is one of the destination countries for surrogacy and Assisted Reproductive Technologies process. Today, the inability to have a child is increasing. Childless couples are increasingly looking for Thailand and elsewhere to allow them to have children through Assisted Reproductive technologies available where there are no laws prohibiting this and it is also affordable. The demand for surrogacy and other artificial conception procedures is rapidly increasing throughout the world. Thailand’s reputation as a place where surrogate mothers can be found is growing. As a result of Surrogate Thai mothers being well regarded for their healthy lifestyle and, combined with Thailand’s first class hospital services, surrogacy has become popular among both Thais and foreigners.The controversy of concerning surrogacy occurred in August 2014. At that time, in the baby Gammy case, an Australian couple, including Gammy ‘s biological father, abandoned one of twins, called Gammy who was born severely handicapped (Down Syndrome) as well as other health complications. The couple took only the child’s twin sister, called Pipah, back to Australia. The problem is who should be responsibility for the baby Gammy. The law in Thailand at that time could not be applied to this situation properly. However, commercial surrogacy was officially banned by the Medical Council of Thailand. Subsequently, shortly afterwards, it was discovered that a Japanese man was the father of a large number of children utilizing surrogate mothers through surrogacy in Thailand. The whole issue was sensitive to the society. The assumption of human trafficking via commercial surrogacy is of great important issue to be investigated. Later, a specialist in Assisted Reproductive technologies had been charged with a number of serious offences. The thing that should be considered in this case is properly legal regulation to solve this problem.Surrogacy arrangements will be permitted or not whereas the intended parents are genuine and they are married. This indicate that they are unable to have own children in the conventional way. Gestation surrogacy is not available, otherwise they are married. That commercial surrogacy should be banned or not is considered upon the public order and morality. The expression of “commercial surrogacy” should be profoundly defined.Moreover, the precise form of the legislation seems to be necessary for the laws to verify for understanding the terms and conditions of surrogacy arrangement.In November 2014, Thailand’s National Legislative Assembly approved the draft surrogacy law. In February 2015, the Thai Parliament passed the legislation of prohibiting commercial surrogacy, called Protection of Children Born from Assisted Reproductive Technologies Act, B.E.2558.This thesis mainly studies commercial surrogacy in Thailand through Protection of Children Born from Assisted Reproductive Technologies Act B.E.2558, analyzes this Act compared to the international surrogacy arrangement in some countries and, and provides some suggestions of this Act.