cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530507.v1
title: Data Paper. Data Paper

description: File List ASCII text, tab delimited. No compression schemes were used. The number of rows (including header row) and columns for each file are: (Apple) 26,255 rows and 17 columns; (Mango1) 1,637 rows and 11 columns; (Mango2) 2,460 rows and 11 columns; (Rubber1) 896 rows and 10 columns; (Rubber2) 12,142 rows and 14 columns; (Walnut) 1,559 rows and 12 columns. Apple_Tree.txt Mango_Tree1.txt Mango_Tree2.txt Rubber_Tree1.txt Rubber_Tree2.txt Walnut_Tree.txt Description The geometrical structure of plant canopies has many implications for plant functioning, microclimatic conditions, and plant-pathogen/herbivore interactions. Plant geometry can be described at several scales. At the finest scale, canopy structure includes the shape, size, location, and orientation of each organ in the canopy. This data set reports the three-dimensional (3-D) geometry of a set of fruit and rubber trees at the leaf scale. A 3-D magnetic digitizer was used to measure the spatial coordinates and the orientation angles of each leaf, namely, the midrib azimuth and inclination angles, and the rolling angle of leaf lamina around the midrib. In addition, for most trees, branching or flush order is given as well as the ranking of leaves along branches and the leaf identity of leaflets in compound-leaved trees. Leaf length was also measured for most trees. Leaf width was measured or estimated based on allometric relationships. Leaf area was derived from allometric relationships with leaf length and width. The data set includes the 3-D geometry of six trees: one apple, two mangos, two rubbers, and one walnut. Plant height ranged from 1.6 m for mango trees to 5.3 m for the large rubber tree. The number of leaves ranged from 895 for the small rubber tree to 26,283 for the apple tree. Total leaf area ranged from 3.6 m<sup>2</sup> for the small rubber tree to 36.4 m<sup>2</sup> for the apple tree. Most of the data were used to show how canopy geometry determines light interception and subsequently plant primary production and fruit yield. The data set was also used to test the quality of innovative methods for canopy structure description at tree scale. The apple tree was used to study the thermal environment of a leaf miner insect, to show how canopy geometry leads to a strongly heterogeneous risk of mortality, in particular under heat-wave conditions. Overall, our data set provides explicit plant architectures suitable for spatial modeling of plant physiological ecology and plant–herbivore interactions, allowing us to determine the mechanisms through which climate impacts biological and ecological processes involved in these functions. <i>Key words: canopy geometry; fruit tree; leaf area; leaf coordinates; leaf orientation; light interception; microclimate; plant architecture; rubber tree; 3-D digitizing.</i>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530504
title: Appendix A. Characterization of the 14 studied food webs.

description: Characterization of the 14 studied food webs.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530501
title: Appendix A. A table listing software for expert elicitation.

description: A table listing software for expert elicitation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530501.v1
title: Appendix A. A table listing software for expert elicitation.

description: A table listing software for expert elicitation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530498
title: Appendix A. Descriptions of covariate development and associated statistical methods.

description: Descriptions of covariate development and associated statistical methods.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530498.v1
title: Appendix A. Descriptions of covariate development and associated statistical methods.

description: Descriptions of covariate development and associated statistical methods.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530495
title: Appendix B. Eight tables presenting proxy diversity estimates, data and model characteristics, and statistical results.

description: Eight tables presenting proxy diversity estimates, data and model characteristics, and statistical results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530495.v1
title: Appendix B. Eight tables presenting proxy diversity estimates, data and model characteristics, and statistical results.

description: Eight tables presenting proxy diversity estimates, data and model characteristics, and statistical results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530492
title: Appendix C. A figure illustrating the observed relationship between percentage live coral cover and habitat Shannon diversity.

description: A figure illustrating the observed relationship between percentage live coral cover and habitat Shannon diversity.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530492.v1
title: Appendix C. A figure illustrating the observed relationship between percentage live coral cover and habitat Shannon diversity.

description: A figure illustrating the observed relationship between percentage live coral cover and habitat Shannon diversity.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530489
title: Appendix A. Comparison of beta-binomial predictions and observed white-footed mouse track activity data.

description: Comparison of beta-binomial predictions and observed white-footed mouse track activity data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530489.v1
title: Appendix A. Comparison of beta-binomial predictions and observed white-footed mouse track activity data.

description: Comparison of beta-binomial predictions and observed white-footed mouse track activity data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530486
title: PowerPoint Slides for: Medication Intervention for Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Transitioning from Hospital to Home: Study Design and Baseline Characteristics

description: <strong><em>Background:</em></strong> The hospital readmission rate in the population with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is high and strategies to reduce this risk are urgently needed. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The CKD-Medication Intervention Trial (CKD-MIT; www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCTO1459770) is a single-blind (investigators), randomized, clinical trial conducted at Providence Health Care in Spokane, Washington. Study participants are hospitalized patients with CKD stages 3-5 (not treated with kidney replacement therapy) and acute illness. The study intervention is a pharmacist-led, home-based, medication management intervention delivered within 7 days after hospital discharge. The primary outcome is a composite of hospital readmissions and visits to emergency departments and urgent care centers for 90 days following hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes are achievements of guideline-based targets for CKD risk factors and complications. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Enrollment began in February 2012 and ended in May 2015. At baseline, the age of participants was 69 ± 11 years (mean ± SD), 50% (77 of 155) were women, 83% (117 of 141) had hypertension and 56% (79 of 141) had diabetes. At baseline, the estimated glomerular filtration rate was 41 ± 14 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio was 43 mg/g (interquartile range 8-528 mg/g). The most frequent diagnosis category for the index hospital admission was cardiovascular diseases at 34% (53 of 155), but the most common single diagnosis for admission was community-acquired acute kidney injury at 10% (16 of 155). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Participants in CKD-MIT are typical of acutely ill hospitalized patients with CKD. A medication management intervention after hospital discharge is under study to reduce post-hospitalization acute care utilization and to improve CKD management.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530486.v1
title: PowerPoint Slides for: Medication Intervention for Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Transitioning from Hospital to Home: Study Design and Baseline Characteristics

description: <strong><em>Background:</em></strong> The hospital readmission rate in the population with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is high and strategies to reduce this risk are urgently needed. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The CKD-Medication Intervention Trial (CKD-MIT; www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCTO1459770) is a single-blind (investigators), randomized, clinical trial conducted at Providence Health Care in Spokane, Washington. Study participants are hospitalized patients with CKD stages 3-5 (not treated with kidney replacement therapy) and acute illness. The study intervention is a pharmacist-led, home-based, medication management intervention delivered within 7 days after hospital discharge. The primary outcome is a composite of hospital readmissions and visits to emergency departments and urgent care centers for 90 days following hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes are achievements of guideline-based targets for CKD risk factors and complications. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Enrollment began in February 2012 and ended in May 2015. At baseline, the age of participants was 69 ± 11 years (mean ± SD), 50% (77 of 155) were women, 83% (117 of 141) had hypertension and 56% (79 of 141) had diabetes. At baseline, the estimated glomerular filtration rate was 41 ± 14 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio was 43 mg/g (interquartile range 8-528 mg/g). The most frequent diagnosis category for the index hospital admission was cardiovascular diseases at 34% (53 of 155), but the most common single diagnosis for admission was community-acquired acute kidney injury at 10% (16 of 155). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Participants in CKD-MIT are typical of acutely ill hospitalized patients with CKD. A medication management intervention after hospital discharge is under study to reduce post-hospitalization acute care utilization and to improve CKD management.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530483
title: Appendix B. Interpolated maps of white-footed mouse track activity.

description: Interpolated maps of white-footed mouse track activity.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530483.v1
title: Appendix B. Interpolated maps of white-footed mouse track activity.

description: Interpolated maps of white-footed mouse track activity.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530480
title: A1_Rcode

description: R code to carry out analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530480.v2
title: A1_Rcode

description: R code to carry out analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530480.v1
title: A1_Rcode

description: R code to carry out analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530477
title: Appendix A. A map of the 15-ha University of Delaware Woods, surrounding forest cover, and road system in New Castle County, Delaware, as of 1997.

description: A map of the 15-ha University of Delaware Woods, surrounding forest cover, and road system in New Castle County, Delaware, as of 1997.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530477.v1
title: Appendix A. A map of the 15-ha University of Delaware Woods, surrounding forest cover, and road system in New Castle County, Delaware, as of 1997.

description: A map of the 15-ha University of Delaware Woods, surrounding forest cover, and road system in New Castle County, Delaware, as of 1997.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12915854
title: had46med_full_sp60_merra_krig.mat

description: GraphEM-infilled HadCRUT4.6 median using a concentration graph obtained via GLASSO with a target sparsity of 0.6%
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530474
title: Appendix B. The number of breeding female and male Wood Thrushes per year at the University of Delaware Woods, 1974–2004.

description: The number of breeding female and male Wood Thrushes per year at the University of Delaware Woods, 1974–2004.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530474.v1
title: Appendix B. The number of breeding female and male Wood Thrushes per year at the University of Delaware Woods, 1974–2004.

description: The number of breeding female and male Wood Thrushes per year at the University of Delaware Woods, 1974–2004.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12915854.v1
title: had46med_full_sp60_merra_krig.mat

description: GraphEM-infilled HadCRUT4.6 median using a concentration graph obtained via GLASSO with a target sparsity of 0.6%
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530471
title: Appendix C. A composite cohort life table of all Wood Thrushes at the University of Delaware Woods, 1974–2004.

description: A composite cohort life table of all Wood Thrushes at the University of Delaware Woods, 1974–2004.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530468
title: A1_TableA5_climate_Eng

description: English averaged monthly temperature and precipitation. UKCP09 gridded data sets, Met Office.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530468.v1
title: A1_TableA5_climate_Eng

description: English averaged monthly temperature and precipitation. UKCP09 gridded data sets, Met Office.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530465
title: Full Archive

description: Full Archive
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530465.v1
title: Full Archive

description: Full Archive
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530462
title: Appendix A. Detailed description of field-survey methods and statistics used.

description: Detailed description of field-survey methods and statistics used.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530462.v1
title: Appendix A. Detailed description of field-survey methods and statistics used.

description: Detailed description of field-survey methods and statistics used.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530459
title: Appendix B. Description of experimental methods and statistics used to determine the effect of host density and dispersion, and presence of a habitat boundary, on Anagrus performance.

description: Description of experimental methods and statistics used to determine the effect of host density and dispersion, and presence of a habitat boundary, on Anagrus performance.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530459.v1
title: Appendix B. Description of experimental methods and statistics used to determine the effect of host density and dispersion, and presence of a habitat boundary, on Anagrus performance.

description: Description of experimental methods and statistics used to determine the effect of host density and dispersion, and presence of a habitat boundary, on Anagrus performance.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530456
title: Appendix C. Detailed methods used in the assessment of Anagrus ovipostion behavior.

description: Detailed methods used in the assessment of Anagrus ovipostion behavior.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530456.v1
title: Appendix C. Detailed methods used in the assessment of Anagrus ovipostion behavior.

description: Detailed methods used in the assessment of Anagrus ovipostion behavior.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530453
title: Appendix D. ANCOVA table for the effects of patch size, host density, and degree of aggregation on several variables associated with the parasitoid Anagrus.

description: ANCOVA table for the effects of patch size, host density, and degree of aggregation on several variables associated with the parasitoid Anagrus.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530453.v1
title: Appendix D. ANCOVA table for the effects of patch size, host density, and degree of aggregation on several variables associated with the parasitoid Anagrus.

description: ANCOVA table for the effects of patch size, host density, and degree of aggregation on several variables associated with the parasitoid Anagrus.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530450
title: Appendix E. ANCOVA table results for the effects of three experimental treatments (location, host dispersion, and host density) on parasitoid density and parasitism.

description: ANCOVA table results for the effects of three experimental treatments (location, host dispersion, and host density) on parasitoid density and parasitism.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530450.v1
title: Appendix E. ANCOVA table results for the effects of three experimental treatments (location, host dispersion, and host density) on parasitoid density and parasitism.

description: ANCOVA table results for the effects of three experimental treatments (location, host dispersion, and host density) on parasitoid density and parasitism.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530447
title: A1_TableA4_climate_Eng_wal

description: England and Wales averaged monthly temperature and precipitation. UKCP09 gridded data sets, Met Office.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530447.v1
title: A1_TableA4_climate_Eng_wal

description: England and Wales averaged monthly temperature and precipitation. UKCP09 gridded data sets, Met Office.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530444
title: Appendix A. List of study sites and plant species sampled at each site.

description: List of study sites and plant species sampled at each site.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530444.v1
title: Appendix A. List of study sites and plant species sampled at each site.

description: List of study sites and plant species sampled at each site.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530441
title: Appendix B. Photographs of selected plant and herbivore species studied.

description: Photographs of selected plant and herbivore species studied.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530441.v1
title: Appendix B. Photographs of selected plant and herbivore species studied.

description: Photographs of selected plant and herbivore species studied.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530438
title: Appendix A. General notation.

description: General notation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530438.v1
title: Appendix A. General notation.

description: General notation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530435
title: Appendix B. A more general form of the model.

description: A more general form of the model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530435.v1
title: Appendix B. A more general form of the model.

description: A more general form of the model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530432
title: Appendix C. Invasibility criteria.

description: Invasibility criteria.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530429
title: Appendix D. Derivation of the invasion rate.

description: Derivation of the invasion rate.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530429.v1
title: Appendix D. Derivation of the invasion rate.

description: Derivation of the invasion rate.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530426
title: Appendix E. Comparison of true and approximate coexistence regions.

description: Comparison of true and approximate coexistence regions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530426.v1
title: Appendix E. Comparison of true and approximate coexistence regions.

description: Comparison of true and approximate coexistence regions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530423
title: Appendix F. Selective predation.

description: Selective predation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530423.v1
title: Appendix F. Selective predation.

description: Selective predation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530420
title: Appendix A. List of the 23 sites with tree ages, coordinates, altitude, and aspect.

description: List of the 23 sites with tree ages, coordinates, altitude, and aspect.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530420.v1
title: Appendix A. List of the 23 sites with tree ages, coordinates, altitude, and aspect.

description: List of the 23 sites with tree ages, coordinates, altitude, and aspect.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530417
title: Appendix B. List of species studied.

description: List of species studied.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530414
title: Appendix C. Test statistics for environmental variables.

description: Test statistics for environmental variables.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530414.v1
title: Appendix C. Test statistics for environmental variables.

description: Test statistics for environmental variables.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530411
title: Appendix D. Model statistics for the general linear models with binomial error term for the 21 most frequent species.

description: Model statistics for the general linear models with binomial error term for the 21 most frequent species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530411.v1
title: Appendix D. Model statistics for the general linear models with binomial error term for the 21 most frequent species.

description: Model statistics for the general linear models with binomial error term for the 21 most frequent species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530408
title: A1_TableA3_climate_UK

description: UK averaged monthly temperature and precipitation. UKCP09 gridded data sets, Met Office.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530408.v1
title: A1_TableA3_climate_UK

description: UK averaged monthly temperature and precipitation. UKCP09 gridded data sets, Met Office.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530405
title: Appendix E. Model statistics for the general linear models with Poisson error term for species richness divided into different groups based on taxonomy and frequency of sexual reproduction.

description: Model statistics for the general linear models with Poisson error term for species richness divided into different groups based on taxonomy and frequency of sexual reproduction.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530402
title: Appendix A. A description of sample collection and processing, modeling parasite transmission, modeling host population dynamics, and associated references.

description: A description of sample collection and processing, modeling parasite transmission, modeling host population dynamics, and associated references.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530402.v1
title: Appendix A. A description of sample collection and processing, modeling parasite transmission, modeling host population dynamics, and associated references.

description: A description of sample collection and processing, modeling parasite transmission, modeling host population dynamics, and associated references.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530399
title: Appendix A. Top 10 tree species for each of the treatment plots.

description: Top 10 tree species for each of the treatment plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530399.v1
title: Appendix A. Top 10 tree species for each of the treatment plots.

description: Top 10 tree species for each of the treatment plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530396
title: Appendix A. Tables of the plant species treatments used.

description: Tables of the plant species treatments used.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530396.v1
title: Appendix A. Tables of the plant species treatments used.

description: Tables of the plant species treatments used.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530393
title: Appendix B. How to measure functional diversity.

description: How to measure functional diversity.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530393.v1
title: Appendix B. How to measure functional diversity.

description: How to measure functional diversity.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530390
title: Appendix A. Verification of plant names and native status.

description: Verification of plant names and native status.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530390.v1
title: Appendix A. Verification of plant names and native status.

description: Verification of plant names and native status.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530387
title: Appendix B. Chi-square test results on plant naturalization patterns.

description: Chi-square test results on plant naturalization patterns.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530387.v1
title: Appendix B. Chi-square test results on plant naturalization patterns.

description: Chi-square test results on plant naturalization patterns.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530384
title: Appendix A. A proof and discussion regarding the importance of not using a survival term within the transition probabilities of Eqs. 3–5.

description: A proof and discussion regarding the importance of not using a survival term within the transition probabilities of Eqs. 3–5.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530384.v1
title: Appendix A. A proof and discussion regarding the importance of not using a survival term within the transition probabilities of Eqs. 3–5.

description: A proof and discussion regarding the importance of not using a survival term within the transition probabilities of Eqs. 3–5.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530378
title: Appendix A. Relationship between the long-term predation risk and the probability of selecting a site (results from logistic regressions) for the three water-dependent browsers.

description: Relationship between the long-term predation risk and the probability of selecting a site (results from logistic regressions) for the three water-dependent browsers.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3530378.v1
title: Appendix A. Relationship between the long-term predation risk and the probability of selecting a site (results from logistic regressions) for the three water-dependent browsers.

description: Relationship between the long-term predation risk and the probability of selecting a site (results from logistic regressions) for the three water-dependent browsers.