cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154535
title: TABLE 3 in A new species of Yunnanilus (Cypriniformes: Nemacheilidae) from upper Pearl River, Yunnan, China

description: TABLE 3. Comparison of morphological characteristics and mean ± standard deviation (Mean± SD) among the Yunnanilus
CharacterYunnanilus yangi sp. nov.Yunnanilus paludosusYunnanilus parvusYunnanilus macrogasterYunnanilus macrolepisNo.of specimens18652Original descriptionLocationPearl River (Nanpan Jiang)Pearl River (Nanpan Jiang)Pearl River (Nanpan Jiang)Pearl River (Nanpan Jiang)Pearl River (Nanpan Jiang)Dorsal-fin raysiii,8iv,8 1/2iv,8 1/2iv,8 1/2iii,7-8Anal-fin raysii,5iii,5 1/2iii,5 1/2iii,5 1/2ii,5Pectoral-fin raysi,11i,10-12i,11-12i,12-13i,9-10Pelvic-fin raysi,6-7i,7-8i,8i,8i,6Body scalesScalelessScalelessScaleScaleScaleEye diameterSmaller than interorbital widthSmaller than interorbital widthSmaller than interorbital widthSmaller than interorbital widthSmaller than interorbital widthUpper lipIncisionWithout incisionWithout incisionWithout incisionWithout incisionLower lipIncisionIncisionIncisionIncisionIncisionUpper jawWithout processus dentiformisProcessus dentiformisProcessus dentiformisProcessus dentiformisProcessus dentiformisLower jawSmoothSmoothSmoothIncisionIncisionTotal length (mm)65.33±5.065.50±8.7238.23±4.2479.22±0.33Standard body length (mm)52.64±4.256.20±7.9030.73±3.6869.23±0.29Body depth10.18±1.319.74±1.706.40±0.9214.41±0.33Predorsal length27.32±2.3035.41±4.6416.09±2.1740.23±0.59Preanal length41.08±3.3352.17±6.2824.29±3.6254.02±0.17Preanus length39.53±3.0350.11±6.0623.40±3.2251.19±0.28Head length10.39±1.0311.18±1.046.85±0.8013.49±0.64Pectoral fin length9.16±0.959.77±1.106.54±0.9810.39±0.79Dorsal-fin length12.87±1.0312.38±2.238.12±0.9110.38±0.62Pelvic-fin length8.05±0.768.08±0.895.19±0.688.01±0.49Anal-fin length8.54±0.678.78±1.355.28±0.669.48±0.88Caudal peduncle length (CPL)7.74±1.089.64±1.314.02±0.568.60±0.62Caudal peduncle depth (CPD)4.35±0.444.88±0.783.15±0.546.82±0.57Head depth7.41±0.706.78±0.774.52±0.428.95±0.55Head width6.08±0.654.80±0.863.50±0.287.73±0.19Snout length4.59±0.355.20±0.792.73±0.516.51±0.45Eye diameter2.45±0.342.01±0.181.65±0.291.84±0.51Interorbital width2.76±0.302.51±0.412.00±0.264.34±0.64
......Continued on the next page
description: Published as part of He, Yun-Rui, Li, Xue-Rong, Che, Xing-Jin, Yang, Xiao-Jun, Wang, Ji-Shan & Wang, Mo, 2024, A new species of Yunnanilus (Cypriniformes: Nemacheilidae) from upper Pearl River, Yunnan, China, pp. 200-201 in Zootaxa (Zool. Res.) 5428 (2) on page 200, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/10847303
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154536
title: TABLE 3 in A new species of Yunnanilus (Cypriniformes: Nemacheilidae) from upper Pearl River, Yunnan, China

description: TABLE 3. Comparison of morphological characteristics and mean ± standard deviation (Mean± SD) among the Yunnanilus
CharacterYunnanilus yangi sp. nov.Yunnanilus paludosusYunnanilus parvusYunnanilus macrogasterYunnanilus macrolepisNo.of specimens18652Original descriptionLocationPearl River (Nanpan Jiang)Pearl River (Nanpan Jiang)Pearl River (Nanpan Jiang)Pearl River (Nanpan Jiang)Pearl River (Nanpan Jiang)Dorsal-fin raysiii,8iv,8 1/2iv,8 1/2iv,8 1/2iii,7-8Anal-fin raysii,5iii,5 1/2iii,5 1/2iii,5 1/2ii,5Pectoral-fin raysi,11i,10-12i,11-12i,12-13i,9-10Pelvic-fin raysi,6-7i,7-8i,8i,8i,6Body scalesScalelessScalelessScaleScaleScaleEye diameterSmaller than interorbital widthSmaller than interorbital widthSmaller than interorbital widthSmaller than interorbital widthSmaller than interorbital widthUpper lipIncisionWithout incisionWithout incisionWithout incisionWithout incisionLower lipIncisionIncisionIncisionIncisionIncisionUpper jawWithout processus dentiformisProcessus dentiformisProcessus dentiformisProcessus dentiformisProcessus dentiformisLower jawSmoothSmoothSmoothIncisionIncisionTotal length (mm)65.33±5.065.50±8.7238.23±4.2479.22±0.33Standard body length (mm)52.64±4.256.20±7.9030.73±3.6869.23±0.29Body depth10.18±1.319.74±1.706.40±0.9214.41±0.33Predorsal length27.32±2.3035.41±4.6416.09±2.1740.23±0.59Preanal length41.08±3.3352.17±6.2824.29±3.6254.02±0.17Preanus length39.53±3.0350.11±6.0623.40±3.2251.19±0.28Head length10.39±1.0311.18±1.046.85±0.8013.49±0.64Pectoral fin length9.16±0.959.77±1.106.54±0.9810.39±0.79Dorsal-fin length12.87±1.0312.38±2.238.12±0.9110.38±0.62Pelvic-fin length8.05±0.768.08±0.895.19±0.688.01±0.49Anal-fin length8.54±0.678.78±1.355.28±0.669.48±0.88Caudal peduncle length (CPL)7.74±1.089.64±1.314.02±0.568.60±0.62Caudal peduncle depth (CPD)4.35±0.444.88±0.783.15±0.546.82±0.57Head depth7.41±0.706.78±0.774.52±0.428.95±0.55Head width6.08±0.654.80±0.863.50±0.287.73±0.19Snout length4.59±0.355.20±0.792.73±0.516.51±0.45Eye diameter2.45±0.342.01±0.181.65±0.291.84±0.51Interorbital width2.76±0.302.51±0.412.00±0.264.34±0.64
......Continued on the next page
description: Published as part of He, Yun-Rui, Li, Xue-Rong, Che, Xing-Jin, Yang, Xiao-Jun, Wang, Ji-Shan & Wang, Mo, 2024, A new species of Yunnanilus (Cypriniformes: Nemacheilidae) from upper Pearl River, Yunnan, China, pp. 200-201 in Zootaxa (Zool. Res.) 5428 (2) on page 200, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/10847303
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10966214
title: Data for article "Personal approach for cancer treatment: a meta-analysis of Phase II Clinical trials"

description: We conducted systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a comprehensive overview of outcomes in patients who underwent personalized genomics-based versus non-personalized treatment in oncology. The PubMed searches detected 803 studies based on phase II clinical trials’ results published from 2010 to 2021. We selected 50 studies, having 81 arms and 6536 patients for the analysis. We compared Response Rate (RR), medians and 1-year rates of Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) between genomics-based personalized and non-personalized arms. This repository contains final dataset (Dataset file) and the information on 803 studies identified in the literature search (803 studies description file). 

The searches, study selection, data extraction and synthesis were performed in accordance to PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis) guidelines. The research protocol was registered in PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO), record ID CRD42024504021. 

We performed proportional meta-analysis using the RStudio program, utilizing the R programming language and packages "meta", "metafor," and "tidyverse", the code is available at github: https://github.com/MikhailPot/PreciseOnco_meta-analysis
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10966215
title: Data for article "Personal approach for cancer treatment: a meta-analysis of Phase II Clinical trials"

description: We conducted systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a comprehensive overview of outcomes in patients who underwent personalized genomics-based versus non-personalized treatment in oncology. The PubMed searches detected 873 studies based on phase II clinical trials’ results published from 2010 to 2021. We selected 46 studies, having 81 arms and 6536 patients for the analysis. We compared Response Rate (RR), medians and 1-year rates of Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) between genomics-based personalized and non-personalized arms. This repository contains final dataset. 

The searches, study selection, data extraction and synthesis were performed in accordance to PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis) guidelines. The research protocol was registered in PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO), record ID CRD42024504021. 

We performed proportional meta-analysis using the RStudio program, utilizing the R programming language and packages "meta", "metafor," and "tidyverse", the code is available at github: https://github.com/MikhailPot/PreciseOnco_meta-analysis
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14996296
title: Data for article "Personal approach for cancer treatment: a meta-analysis of Phase II Clinical trials"

description: We conducted systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a comprehensive overview of outcomes in patients who underwent personalized genomics-based versus non-personalized treatment in oncology. The PubMed searches detected 803 studies based on phase II clinical trials’ results published from 2010 to 2021. We selected 50 studies, having 81 arms and 6536 patients for the analysis. We compared Response Rate (RR), medians and 1-year rates of Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) between genomics-based personalized and non-personalized arms. This repository contains final dataset. 

The searches, study selection, data extraction and synthesis were performed in accordance to PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis) guidelines. The research protocol was registered in PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO), record ID CRD42024504021. 

We performed proportional meta-analysis using the RStudio program, utilizing the R programming language and packages "meta", "metafor," and "tidyverse", the code is available at github: https://github.com/MikhailPot/PreciseOnco_meta-analysis
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154547
title: Data for article "Personal approach for cancer treatment: a meta-analysis of Phase II Clinical trials"

description: We conducted systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a comprehensive overview of outcomes in patients who underwent personalized genomics-based versus non-personalized treatment in oncology. The PubMed searches detected 803 studies based on phase II clinical trials’ results published from 2010 to 2021. We selected 50 studies, having 81 arms and 6536 patients for the analysis. We compared Response Rate (RR), medians and 1-year rates of Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) between genomics-based personalized and non-personalized arms. This repository contains final dataset (Dataset file) and the information on 803 studies identified in the literature search (803 studies description file). 

The searches, study selection, data extraction and synthesis were performed in accordance to PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis) guidelines. The research protocol was registered in PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO), record ID CRD42024504021. 

We performed proportional meta-analysis using the RStudio program, utilizing the R programming language and packages "meta", "metafor," and "tidyverse", the code is available at github: https://github.com/MikhailPot/PreciseOnco_meta-analysis
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154537
title: Table 1 in Phytotoxic flavonoids from roots of Stellera chamaejasme L. (Thymelaeaceae)

description: Table 1 Phytotoxic effect of flavonoids from root of S. chamaejasme on A. thaliana seedlings.
Fresh weight, % of control (Mean ± SE)IC50 values1.25 µg/mL2.5 µg/mL5 µg/mL10 µg/mL25 µg/mL50 µg/mL100 µg/mL200 µg/mL(µg/mL)Neochamaejasmin B (1)90.13 ± 7.6483.22 ± 9.5852.08 ± 8.44*33.62 ± 3.66*15.87 ± 1.30*11.09 ± 2.97*4.25 ± 1.05*2.20 ± 0.99*6.9Mesoneochamaejasmin A (2)81.81 ± 4.8464.86 ± 9.45*54.19 ± 3.34*40.38 ± 4.28*40.16 ± 1.79*29.02 ± 1.23*9.72 ± 1.73*6.02 ± 0.61*12.1Chamaejasmenin C (3)83.91 ± 6.7474.26 ± 7.1270.67 ± 4.23*73.74 ± 5.1174.11 ± 5.7950.79 ± 1.54*3.90 ± 0.77*2.11 ± 0.33*43.27-Methoxylneochaejasmin A (4)101.73 ± 12.37102.16 ± 14.5798.34 ± 11.4389.59 ± 5.8993.25 ± 4.6985.82 ± 6.9088.62 ± 2.4978.03 ± 1.69>200(+)-Epiafzelechin (5)96.04 ± 15.498.87 ± 3.7885.7 ± 7.3676.73 ± 9.2170.47 ± 4.9177.87 ± 8.0666.84 ± 4.7565.41 ± 2.32>200Genkwanol A (6)99.24 ± 6.8195.35 ± 2.4787.8 ± 10.5287.57 ± 4.5993.82 ± 7.1181.00 ± 7.4025.90 ± 6.03 *17.11 ± 1.22 *74.8Daphnodorin B (7)90.18 ± 6.0687.57 ± 4.0168.34 ± 7.3039.59 ± 2.68*14.27 ± 1.07*12.04 ± 4.75*10.73 ± 2.38*4.06 ± 0.86*7.1Dihydrodaphnodorin B (8)95.35 ± 3.4881.66 ± 8.4769.77 ± 4.25*67.08 ± 4.7662.00 ± 5.33*40.43 ± 7.82*24.37 ± 4.82*9.53 ± 1.64*27.3
Seven-day-old A. thaliana Col-0 seedlings were treated with compounds 1–8 at concentrations of 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100 and 200 µg/mL for 7 days, respectively. Fresh weight of the seedlings was collected. Values in the table are presented as percentage of the mean compared to the control. SE is one standard error of the mean, n = 4. The IC 50 values of the phytotoxic flavonoids were calculated using SPSS 16.0 software. * P <0.05.
description: Published as part of Yan, Zhiqiang, Guo, Hongru, Yang, Jiayue, Liu, Quan, Jin, Hui, Xu, Rui, Cui, Haiyan & Qin, Bo, 2014, Phytotoxic flavonoids from roots of Stellera chamaejasme L. (Thymelaeaceae), pp. 63 in Phytochemistry 106 on page 63, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.07.013, http://zenodo.org/record/10489523
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154538
title: Table 1 in Phytotoxic flavonoids from roots of Stellera chamaejasme L. (Thymelaeaceae)

description: Table 1 Phytotoxic effect of flavonoids from root of S. chamaejasme on A. thaliana seedlings.
Fresh weight, % of control (Mean ± SE)IC50 values1.25 µg/mL2.5 µg/mL5 µg/mL10 µg/mL25 µg/mL50 µg/mL100 µg/mL200 µg/mL(µg/mL)Neochamaejasmin B (1)90.13 ± 7.6483.22 ± 9.5852.08 ± 8.44*33.62 ± 3.66*15.87 ± 1.30*11.09 ± 2.97*4.25 ± 1.05*2.20 ± 0.99*6.9Mesoneochamaejasmin A (2)81.81 ± 4.8464.86 ± 9.45*54.19 ± 3.34*40.38 ± 4.28*40.16 ± 1.79*29.02 ± 1.23*9.72 ± 1.73*6.02 ± 0.61*12.1Chamaejasmenin C (3)83.91 ± 6.7474.26 ± 7.1270.67 ± 4.23*73.74 ± 5.1174.11 ± 5.7950.79 ± 1.54*3.90 ± 0.77*2.11 ± 0.33*43.27-Methoxylneochaejasmin A (4)101.73 ± 12.37102.16 ± 14.5798.34 ± 11.4389.59 ± 5.8993.25 ± 4.6985.82 ± 6.9088.62 ± 2.4978.03 ± 1.69>200(+)-Epiafzelechin (5)96.04 ± 15.498.87 ± 3.7885.7 ± 7.3676.73 ± 9.2170.47 ± 4.9177.87 ± 8.0666.84 ± 4.7565.41 ± 2.32>200Genkwanol A (6)99.24 ± 6.8195.35 ± 2.4787.8 ± 10.5287.57 ± 4.5993.82 ± 7.1181.00 ± 7.4025.90 ± 6.03 *17.11 ± 1.22 *74.8Daphnodorin B (7)90.18 ± 6.0687.57 ± 4.0168.34 ± 7.3039.59 ± 2.68*14.27 ± 1.07*12.04 ± 4.75*10.73 ± 2.38*4.06 ± 0.86*7.1Dihydrodaphnodorin B (8)95.35 ± 3.4881.66 ± 8.4769.77 ± 4.25*67.08 ± 4.7662.00 ± 5.33*40.43 ± 7.82*24.37 ± 4.82*9.53 ± 1.64*27.3
Seven-day-old A. thaliana Col-0 seedlings were treated with compounds 1–8 at concentrations of 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100 and 200 µg/mL for 7 days, respectively. Fresh weight of the seedlings was collected. Values in the table are presented as percentage of the mean compared to the control. SE is one standard error of the mean, n = 4. The IC 50 values of the phytotoxic flavonoids were calculated using SPSS 16.0 software. * P <0.05.
description: Published as part of Yan, Zhiqiang, Guo, Hongru, Yang, Jiayue, Liu, Quan, Jin, Hui, Xu, Rui, Cui, Haiyan & Qin, Bo, 2014, Phytotoxic flavonoids from roots of Stellera chamaejasme L. (Thymelaeaceae), pp. 63 in Phytochemistry 106 on page 63, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.07.013, http://zenodo.org/record/10489523
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154539
title: Table 2 in Phytotoxic flavonoids from roots of Stellera chamaejasme L. (Thymelaeaceae)

description: Table 2 Concentrations and recoveries of compounds from surrounding soil of S. chamaejasme.
Concentration (mg/kg soil) aRecovery (%)bMinxian (34°2403100N, 104°0501200E)Tianzhu (37°0900700N, 102°5101000E)Compound 10.2470.11795.99Compound 20.4180.15898.72Compound 40.0390.02996.32Compound 80.2370.14794.27
a Representative results of three soil samples from each location. b Routine recovery assay was replicated twice, one of the results was listed.
description: Published as part of Yan, Zhiqiang, Guo, Hongru, Yang, Jiayue, Liu, Quan, Jin, Hui, Xu, Rui, Cui, Haiyan & Qin, Bo, 2014, Phytotoxic flavonoids from roots of Stellera chamaejasme L. (Thymelaeaceae), pp. 65 in Phytochemistry 106 on page 65, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.07.013, http://zenodo.org/record/10489523
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154540
title: Table 2 in Phytotoxic flavonoids from roots of Stellera chamaejasme L. (Thymelaeaceae)

description: Table 2 Concentrations and recoveries of compounds from surrounding soil of S. chamaejasme.
Concentration (mg/kg soil) aRecovery (%)bMinxian (34°2403100N, 104°0501200E)Tianzhu (37°0900700N, 102°5101000E)Compound 10.2470.11795.99Compound 20.4180.15898.72Compound 40.0390.02996.32Compound 80.2370.14794.27
a Representative results of three soil samples from each location. b Routine recovery assay was replicated twice, one of the results was listed.
description: Published as part of Yan, Zhiqiang, Guo, Hongru, Yang, Jiayue, Liu, Quan, Jin, Hui, Xu, Rui, Cui, Haiyan & Qin, Bo, 2014, Phytotoxic flavonoids from roots of Stellera chamaejasme L. (Thymelaeaceae), pp. 65 in Phytochemistry 106 on page 65, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.07.013, http://zenodo.org/record/10489523
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154541
title: Table 3 in Phytotoxic flavonoids from roots of Stellera chamaejasme L. (Thymelaeaceae)

description: Table 3 Effect of flavonoids from surrounding soil of S. chamaejasme on the growth of C. nutans seedlings
Root length, % of control (Mean ± SE)Shoot length, % of control (Mean ± SE)Fresh weight, % of control (Mean ± SE)Compound 1Compound 2Compound 4Compound 8Compound 1Compound 2Compound 4Compound 8Compound 1Compound 2Compound 4Compound 81 µg / mL99.14 ± 25.0889.63 ± 18.89102.43 ± 16.7496.9 ± 15.3497.83 ± 14.1994.06 ± 12.46101 ± 23.91100.52 ± 19.1899.79 ± 8.5289.68 ± 7.03103.17 ± 17.8898.32 ± 17.893 µg / mL90.54 ± 11.9790.32 ± 7.2498.14 ± 13.5594.73 ± 17.2192.31 ± 7.4595.22 ± 15.34101.5 ± 26.9494.27 ± 10.3593.44 ± 14.3594.28 ± 17.85100.37 ± 14.6793.7 ± 14.3810 µ g / mL90.15 ± 14.3676.68 ± 11.9591.67 ± 8.2796.61 ± 26.695.64 ± 11.490.49 ± 5.8997.67 ± 15.1391.68 ± 12.7893.63 ± 12.4284.73 ± 15.2895.64 ± 15.5394.95 ± 9.6725 µ g/ mL87.07 ± 7.6571.11 ± 9.32 *84.72 ± 11.6888.98 ± 19.2890.87 ± 14.6488.86 ± 14.4798.82 ± 19.2884.62 ± 16.5389.17 ± 9.8785.57 ± 8.6493.59 ± 16.9479.52 ± 17.0850 µ g / mL78.41 ± 10.2354.88 ± 12.68 *84.72 ± 23.2284.52 ± 11.6586.3 ± 10.1690.43 ± 17.1496.58 ± 24.6787.82 ± 10.1684.72 ± 17.6480.05 ± 10.1588.76 ± 13.9174.21 ± 10.19100 µ g / mL69.83 ± 9.07 *56.1 ± 10.54 *80.56 ± 19.974.58 ± 6.4 *80.82 ± 17.3384.69 ± 16.4686.04 ± 8.373.08 ± 17.3373.93 ± 8.67 *69.93 ± 8.08 *84.32 ± 8.369.23 ± 7.58 *200 µ g / mL63.79 ± 9.12 *47.56 ± 10.63 *80.56 ± 12.4558.47 ± 11.07 *74.89 ± 18.8778.47 ± 19.9761.37 ± 14.23 *71.15 ± 19.8766.77 ± 4.06 *56.46 ± 11.81 *77.81 ± 14.2362.33 ± 9.75 *
description: Published as part of Yan, Zhiqiang, Guo, Hongru, Yang, Jiayue, Liu, Quan, Jin, Hui, Xu, Rui, Cui, Haiyan & Qin, Bo, 2014, Phytotoxic flavonoids from roots of Stellera chamaejasme L. (Thymelaeaceae), pp. 66 in Phytochemistry 106 on page 66, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.07.013, http://zenodo.org/record/10489523
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154542
title: Table 3 in Phytotoxic flavonoids from roots of Stellera chamaejasme L. (Thymelaeaceae)

description: Table 3 Effect of flavonoids from surrounding soil of S. chamaejasme on the growth of C. nutans seedlings
Root length, % of control (Mean ± SE)Shoot length, % of control (Mean ± SE)Fresh weight, % of control (Mean ± SE)Compound 1Compound 2Compound 4Compound 8Compound 1Compound 2Compound 4Compound 8Compound 1Compound 2Compound 4Compound 81 µg / mL99.14 ± 25.0889.63 ± 18.89102.43 ± 16.7496.9 ± 15.3497.83 ± 14.1994.06 ± 12.46101 ± 23.91100.52 ± 19.1899.79 ± 8.5289.68 ± 7.03103.17 ± 17.8898.32 ± 17.893 µg / mL90.54 ± 11.9790.32 ± 7.2498.14 ± 13.5594.73 ± 17.2192.31 ± 7.4595.22 ± 15.34101.5 ± 26.9494.27 ± 10.3593.44 ± 14.3594.28 ± 17.85100.37 ± 14.6793.7 ± 14.3810 µ g / mL90.15 ± 14.3676.68 ± 11.9591.67 ± 8.2796.61 ± 26.695.64 ± 11.490.49 ± 5.8997.67 ± 15.1391.68 ± 12.7893.63 ± 12.4284.73 ± 15.2895.64 ± 15.5394.95 ± 9.6725 µ g/ mL87.07 ± 7.6571.11 ± 9.32 *84.72 ± 11.6888.98 ± 19.2890.87 ± 14.6488.86 ± 14.4798.82 ± 19.2884.62 ± 16.5389.17 ± 9.8785.57 ± 8.6493.59 ± 16.9479.52 ± 17.0850 µ g / mL78.41 ± 10.2354.88 ± 12.68 *84.72 ± 23.2284.52 ± 11.6586.3 ± 10.1690.43 ± 17.1496.58 ± 24.6787.82 ± 10.1684.72 ± 17.6480.05 ± 10.1588.76 ± 13.9174.21 ± 10.19100 µ g / mL69.83 ± 9.07 *56.1 ± 10.54 *80.56 ± 19.974.58 ± 6.4 *80.82 ± 17.3384.69 ± 16.4686.04 ± 8.373.08 ± 17.3373.93 ± 8.67 *69.93 ± 8.08 *84.32 ± 8.369.23 ± 7.58 *200 µ g / mL63.79 ± 9.12 *47.56 ± 10.63 *80.56 ± 12.4558.47 ± 11.07 *74.89 ± 18.8778.47 ± 19.9761.37 ± 14.23 *71.15 ± 19.8766.77 ± 4.06 *56.46 ± 11.81 *77.81 ± 14.2362.33 ± 9.75 *
description: Published as part of Yan, Zhiqiang, Guo, Hongru, Yang, Jiayue, Liu, Quan, Jin, Hui, Xu, Rui, Cui, Haiyan & Qin, Bo, 2014, Phytotoxic flavonoids from roots of Stellera chamaejasme L. (Thymelaeaceae), pp. 66 in Phytochemistry 106 on page 66, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.07.013, http://zenodo.org/record/10489523
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154543
title: Table 1 in A new and rare epigean asellid from western Mexico Caecidotea contrerasbalderasi sp. nov. (Isopoda: Asellidae) with a new suture pattern in pleopod IV for the Mexican epigean species

description: Table 1. Checklist of species of the genus Caecidotea recorded in Mexico.
Species and authorDistributionHabitatC. alvarezi García-Vázquez,Rodríguez-Almaraz and Pedraza-Lara, 2021JaliscoEpigean, lakeC. buzwilsoni García-Vázquez, Rodríguez-Almaraz and Pedraza-Lara, 2021GuanajuatoEpigean, freshwater lagoonC. camaxtli García-Vázquez, Rodríguez-Almaraz and Pedraza-Lara, 2019TlaxcalaEpigean, freshwater springC. chiapas Bowman, 1975ChiapasHypogean, subterranean watersC. chicoensis García-Vázquez, Rodríguez-Almaraz and Pedraza-Lara, 2021HidalgoEpigean, freshwater springC. communis (Say, 1818)Puebla, Mexico City, Michoacán, and VeracruzEpigean and freshwater habitats as lakes and lagoonsC. contrerasbalderasi sp. nov.NayaritEpigean, groundwater hot springC. mintzita García-Vázquez,Rodríguez-Almaraz and Pedraza-Lara, 2021MichoacánEpigean, freshwater springC. pasquinii Argano, 1972VeracruzHypogean, subterranean watersC. puebla (Cole and Minckley, 1968)PueblaEpigean, riverC. villalobosi García-Vázquez, Rodríguez-Almaraz and Pedraza-Lara, 2021VeracruzEpigean, lakeC. vomeroi Argano,1977ChiapasHypogean, subterranean watersC. williamsi Escobar-Briones and Alcocer, 2002PueblaEpigean, saline crater-lakeC. xochimilca Rocha-Ramírez and Peñaloza-Daniel, 2011Mexico CityEpigean, lakeC. zacapuensis García-Vázquez, Rodríguez-Almaraz and Pedraza-Lara, 2021MichoacánEpigean, freshwater lagoonC. zullini Argano, 1977ChiapasHypogean, subterranean waters
description: Published as part of García-Vázquez, Leonardo, Campos, Ernesto & Rodríguez-Almaráz, Gabino A., 2023, A new and rare epigean asellid from western Mexico Caecidotea contrerasbalderasi sp. nov. (Isopoda: Asellidae) with a new suture pattern in pleopod IV for the Mexican epigean species, pp. 2 in Nauplius 31 on page 2, DOI: 10.1590/2358-2936e2023012, http://zenodo.org/record/10905068