cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/poqnhu
title: Supplemental Data: Activation of α-7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Reduces Ischemic Stroke Injury through Reduction of Pro-Inflammatory Macrophages and Oxidative Stress

description: Correct Figure 3 and 5
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ppqhk7
title: Togo (2010): Evaluation de l'utilisation du condom lors de rapports sexuels avec les partenaires extraconjugales chez les Forces Armees Togolaises Cinquieme Passage

description: Ce rapport presente les resultats du cinquieme passage de l'etude s'inscrit dans le cadre du projet intitule "Operation Haute Protection" au sein des Forces Armees Togolaises. L'objectif de l'etude est d'evaluer l'utilisation du condom lors des rapports sexuels extraconjugaux au cours des 12 derniers mois precedants l'enquete. Cette etude a utilise une approche methodologique simple. Au total 1697 militaires ont ete interviewes dans les camps sur toute l'etendue du territoire a travers les 4 garnisons. Le questionnaire a couvert les aspects tels que les caracteristiques sociodemographiques, les activites sexuelles selon les types de partenaires, les determinants de l'utilisation du condom, et les indicateurs du cadre logique.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/cicur
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1860, leave to withdraw, SC1/series 231, Petition of Richard Clap

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Against slave hunting &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858690"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858690&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Dorchester &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Henry L. Pierce, Dorchester; committee on federal relations &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Richard Clap&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Stephen Baker&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;George Ford&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 68 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 31 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 37 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, legal voters, other adults, [females], ["other residents"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1860, leave to withdraw &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/8o6meo
title: Spawning migrations of Atlantic Sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) in the Altamaha River, Georgia 2011-2014

description: Data from University of Georgia acoustic telemetry study on the spawning migrations of Atlantic Sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) in the Altamaha River, Georgia, from 2011-2014. Includes telemetry data on time/date and river location of 26 individual Atlantic sturgeon.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/d35mi
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1849, Docket 2343, SC1/series 230, Petition of Addison Everett

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Secession from the Union &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11029669"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11029669&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Middlefield &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: George W. Greene, Milton; committee on the judiciary &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Addison Everett&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Calvin Smith&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Samuel Smith&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1849-03-01 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on March 1, 1849 and referred to the committee on the judiciary &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 9 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 9 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: inhabitants, legal voters &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1849, Docket 2343 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/f6b9py
title: Wright Files I-Z Edited; Docketed Case: 73-1262
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/c7gfwt
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 82-2481
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/evhelh
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 17,060
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/po4ewy
title: Replication data for: Nearest Neighbor Networks: clustering expression data based on gene neighborhoods

description: &lt;b&gt;Background&lt;/b&gt; The availability of microarrays measuring thousands of genes simultaneously across hundreds of biological conditions represents an opportunity to understand both individual biological pathways and the integrated workings of the cell. However, translating this amount of data into biological insight remains a daunting task. An important initial step in the analysis of microarray data is clustering of genes with similar behavior. A number of classical techniques are commonly used
to perform this task, particularly hierarchical and K-means clustering, and many novel approaches have been suggested recently. While these approaches are useful, they are not without drawbacks; these methods can find clusters in purely random data, and even clusters enriched for biological functions can be skewed towards a small number of processes (e.g. ribosomes).
&lt;b&gt;Results&lt;/b&gt; We developed Nearest Neighbor Networks (NNN), a graph-based algorithm to generate clusters of genes with similar expression profiles. This method produces clusters based on overlapping cliques within an interaction network generated from mutual nearest neighborhoods. This focus on nearest neighbors rather than on absolute distance measures allows us to capture clusters with high connectivity even when they are spatially separated, and requiring mutual nearest neighbors allows gene
s with no sufficiently similar partners to remain unclustered. We compared the clusters generated by NNN with those generated by eight other clustering methods. NNN was particularly successful at generating functionally coherent clusters with high precision, and these clusters generally represented a much broader selection of biological processes than those recovered by other methods.
&lt;b&gt;Conclusion&lt;/b&gt; The Nearest Neighbor Networks algorithm is a valuable clustering method that effectively groups genes that are likely to be functionally related. It is particularly attractive due to its simplicity, its success in the analysis of large datasets, and its ability to span a wide range of biological functions with high precision
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/bvo15f
title: Pliek U-Oil Ointment for Atopic Dermatitis Treatment: A Clinical Trial

description: Master table of the result of patient examination for Pliek U-Oil Ointment for Atopic Dermatitis Treatment: A Clinical Trial
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/d2squg
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 72-1703
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/oh2pky
title: FACEBRASIL 15 FEV 2012

description: Revista brasileira, Orlando, Florida
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/c8pwz7
title: Hughes v. Mississippi Transportation Commission, Landy Report (defendant's expert)
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/hmpwih
title: Transnational Climate Governance and the Global 500: Examining Private Actor Participation by Firm-Level Factors and Dynamics

description: This article focuses on the Global 500, which are the world’s largest companies by revenue, to examine the factors and dynamics internal to companies that motivate some corporations, but not others, to engage in transnational climate governance. Empirical results based on multilevel mixed-effects analyses, which separately identify the relative weight of firm and country-level factors, suggest that the likelihood that a firm participates in transnational climate governance (TCG) is higher when there exists a “policy supporter” who champions sustainability policies and when a company adopts explicit sustainability practices, such as the incorporation of ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) principles. Voluntary climate action and carbon disclosure are more likely to take place when a company has a large asset base and certifies with the ISO 14001 environmental management standard. Moreover, the level of civil liberties that corporations enjoy in their respective country of origin is associated with participation in TCG. A decomposition of the variance indicates that firm-level factors account for a majority of the variance in TCG participation. This study has implications for climate change governance and policies, which have increasingly focused on concrete climate solutions and innovations by nonstate and substate actors.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/4nnvyh
title: Database for Cost of Preparation and Delivery of Td Vaccine to 7-Year-Old Children in Vietnam

description: The Immunization Costing Action Network (ICAN) was a three-year project, supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and facilitated by ThinkWell and JSI, which included the implementation of costing studies in Indonesia, Tanzania, and Vietnam. This dataset original data collected during the Vietnam country study as well as the analysis undertaken on those data.

The study, undertaken between 2017 and 2019 by team of researchers from the Hanoi School of Public Health (HUPH), in close collaboration with the Ministry of Health National Expanded Programme on Immunization (NEPI), estimates the delivery costs of introducing Td vaccination of 7-year-old children in Vietnam, and ceasing the current delivery of TT vaccine to women of childbearing age and the delivery of Td vaccine for outbreak control. The study's main research question were: "What are the total costs, incremental costs and unit costs of Td vaccination provided to 7-year-old children in Vietnam, which includes a program of introduction of Td for 7-year-olds and future cessation of TT vaccination of women of childbearing age (CBAW)? Would the introduction of Td and cessation of TT be cost saving (i.e., have a lower impact on the immunization budget)?" The study collected both economic and fiscal costs.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/c49dfv
title: Wright Files I-Z Edited; Misc 1797
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/osoe1e
title: Replication data for: Lacerta (DHT12)

description: This is one of about a dozen relatively small surveys carried out to search for molecular clouds predicted by the infrared analysis of DHT2001 (shaded purple in Fig. 1; see Section 3.1.4). In nearly all cases molecular gas was detected.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/piqsah
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 17,971
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/4heg6m
title: Wright Files I-Z Edited; Docketed Case: 20985
DOI: 10.15468/dl.xmhe4u
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 67 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 "BasisOfRecord is one of (Human Observation, Machine Observation, Occurrence evidence, Observation)",
 "TaxonKey is one of (Chlorocebus sabaeus (Linnaeus, 1766))",
 "Country is one of (Bermuda, Canada, Greenland, Saint Pierre and Miquelon, United States of America)"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 67 records from 1 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0015063-250525065834625/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/bxeqle
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 18,782
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/krkbc
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1851, Docket 13162, SC1/series 231, Petition of George W. Simonds

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Fugitive slave laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858304"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858304&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Lexington &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;George W. Simonds&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Amos Adams&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hannah S. Robbins&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 118 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 45 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 52 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Other male signatures: 3 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Unidentified signatures: 18 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: inhabitants, legal voters, other persons, others, [females], [other males] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1851, Docket 13162 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ojtsvd
title: Keepseagle v. Vilsack, USDA, Fryberg Report (plaintiff's expert)
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/bxeg7
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1839, Docket 10525, SC1/series 231, Petition of Hannah Montgomery

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: To abolish slavery in Washington D.C. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11857949"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11857949&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Bradford &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Benjamin Greenleaf, Bradford &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hannah Montgomery&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Priscilla H. Kimball&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Louisa R. Hopkinson&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 149 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 149 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: Yes &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: women, [females], ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1839, Docket 10525 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/euyvh
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1844, Docket 1410, SC1/series 230, Petition of John L. Lord

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Abolition of capital punishment &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13481320"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13481320&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Newburyport &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Benjamin F. Newhall, Saugus; special committee &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;John L. Lord&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Isaac Swan&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Dexter Dana&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;John T. Whittier&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Charles Whipple&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 133 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 133 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: inhabitants, ["citizens"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: wafers &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1844, Docket 1410 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/pmyjd
title: Passed Resolves; Resolves 1860, c.24, SC1/series 228, Petition of Rebecca Davis

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Support for individuals &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13448062"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13448062&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: [Boston?] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: John S. Eldridge, Canton; committee on claims &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Rebecca Davis&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1860-01-16,1860-01-17 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on January 16, 1860 and referred to the committee on claims and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on January 17, 1860 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Females of color signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: Yes &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: a member of the Ponkapog tribe of Indians, [females of color] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: witnessed by Sarah Adams, Ponkapoag tribe, annuity, feeble health, insufficient, additional sum &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Resolves 1860, c.24, passed March 13, 1860 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/bm8fsc
title: Project Leader Survey for Butterfly Citizen Science Projects Support Conservation Activities Among Their Volunteers

description: Survey data presented as supplementary material for the article "Butterfly Citizen Science Projects Support Conservation Activities Among Their Participants", in press (January 2016). The questionnaire contained questions about project characteristics and strategies and activities that could promote conservation activities among participants.
description: In press (January 2016)
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/4boya
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1839, Docket 577, SC1/series 230, Petition of Lydia Maria Child

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Repeal of interracial marriage, anti-miscegenation laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10956325"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10956325&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1839-03-20 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Northampton &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: George Bradburn, Nantucket &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Lydia Maria Child&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: Yes &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: free-born woman, [females] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1839, Docket 577 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/89fckx
title: Special protected zones SITES
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/489dwy
title: Wright Files I-Z Edited; Docketed Case: 84-1034
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/dwcmor
title: Corruption and Ethics in Democracy: The Portuguese Case, 2006

description: The main objective of the study is to understand the ethical context in which Portuguese democracy takes place, analysing the attitudes, values and practices of citizens regarding corruption. In other words, the study tried to figure out: what do Portuguese citizens think about ethics and corruption; what is the importance level of corruption among other themes of public agenda; how they judge behaviours regarding the public and political positions; how they evaluate the fight against corruption and what measures should be taken.
description: Patrícia Miranda, null
description: Patrícia Miranda
description: Complete description of the study here: http://www.apis.ics.ulisboa.pt/catalogo/APIS0038/
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/evecae
title: Wright Files I-Z Edited; Docketed Case: 76-1911