cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.3535/dbx-v3g-wvm
title: Foraminifera d'Orbigny, 1826

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/jl2-pza-nfg
title: Animalia

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/z5y-z4p-6sw
title: †Judahella (Judahella) Sohn, 1968

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/34itja
title: Replication Data for: A Red Flag for Public Goods? The Correlates of Civil Society Restrictions

description: Replication code and data
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/bnsy7d
title: Wright Files I-Z Edited; Docketed Case: 73-1025
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/bda7m
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1849, Docket 2318A, SC1/series 230, Petition of Otis G. Cheever

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Abolition of capital punishment &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13481496"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13481496&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Wrentham &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: R.H. Williams, Norton; committee on that subject &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Otis G. Cheever&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;James Arnold&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Edward C. Rogers&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Susan Cheever&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hannah Arnold&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Patience Tillinghart&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Charles Ray&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1849-02-20 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on February 20, 1849 and referred to the committee on that subject and sent for concurrence &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 123 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 50 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 64 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Other male signatures: 7 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Unidentified signatures: 2 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: inhabitants, legal voters, women and others, [females], [other males], ["others"], ["non voters"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1849, Docket 2318A &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ii6qsl
title: PDB 6OY4 - Crystal structure of complex between recombinant Der p 2.0103 and Fab fragment of 7A1, (313K, 40°C, 100 ns): RMSD, SASA, RMSF, Rg, H-bonds

description: PDB 6OY4 - Crystal structure of complex between recombinant Der p 2.0103 and Fab fragment of 7A1, (313K, 40°C, 100 ns): RMSD, SASA, RMSF, Rg, H-bonds
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/9zbem4
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 83-1670
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ejijkf
title: Replication Data for: "A Sectoral Approach to the Politics of State Aid in the European Union: an Analysis of the European Automotive Industry"

description: A growing body of scholarship has been focusing on the determinants of subsidy spending.
Yet, this literature has mostly overlooked sectoral approaches to explain variation in aid
allocations, which can provide useful insights about state-business relations that macroanalyses
cannot. The article explores the political determinants of state aid in a key sector
of the European economy, the automotive industry, which represents a crucial test case to
analyse the relationship between big firms and the state. The article argues that there are
two mechanisms through which governments may choose to allocate aid: achievement of
policy goals and electoral competition. The resulting hypotheses are tested on an original
dataset of over 120 state aid measures in 16 member states of the European Union (EU)
where an automotive industry is present between 1992 and 2011. The results show that
aid allocations are seldom found to be determined by a government’s preferences over its
policy objectives. Instead, electoral rules such as the cultivation of a personal reputation by
distribution of targeted benefits to a constituency may help legislators in their chances of
being re-elected. The article concludes with limitations of the present study and suggestions
for future research.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/bswiat
title: California Poll: 7808 -- September 17-24, 1978

description: The Field Poll, established in 1945 as The California Poll by Mervin Field, has operated continuously as an independent, non-partisan, media-sponsored public opinion news service. Each year the Field Polls cover a wide range of political and social topics examining California public opinion. Continuing measures are made of voter support for leading political figures vying for major state and federal offices, job ratings of important political figures and reactions to significant political events. Voter awareness, understanding and predispositions of major campaign issues and salient statewide ballot propositions are also tracked over time. For poll 7808 N=1075.
description: Subject: STANDARD DEPOSIT TERMS 1.0 Type: DATAPASS:TERMS:STANDARD:1.0 Notes: The UCLA Social Science Data Archive (“the Archive”) gives permission and any required licenses to Data-PASS to make the Content available for archiving, preservation and access (with permission of the Archive), within the Data Preservation Alliance for the Social Sciences ("Data-PASS") in accordance with the Data-PASS terms (the "Terms") of use (available from: http://www.icpsr.org/Data-PASS). Including permission to: (a) redisseminate copies of the Data Collection in a variety of distribution formats only according to the standard terms of use of the Archive; (b) promote and advertise the Data Collection in any publicity (in any form) for Data-PASS and the Archive; (c) describe, catalog, validate and document the Content; (d) store, translate, copy or re-format the Data Collection in any way to ensure its future preservation and accessibility, improve usability and/or protect respondent confidentiality; (e) incorporate metadata (cataloging information) or documentation regarding this study into public access catalogues. The Archive represents and warrants that the Content conforms to all Terms and that the Archive is lawfully entitled and has full authority to license Data-Pass to use the Materials in the ways described in the Terms.;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ihti9h
title: Baseline data for the stress tolerant rice for poor farmers in africa and south asia (strasa) project

description: The projet "Stress Tolerant Rice for Poor Farmers in africa and South Asia" (STRASA) was funded by
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/7tyaol
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 82-1255
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/owgear
title: Replication Data for: The Durability of Client Regimes: Foreign Sponsorship and Military Loyalty, 1946-2010

description: Conventional wisdom suggests that great power patrons prop up client dictatorships. However, this is generally assumed rather than systematically analyzed. In this paper, I provide the first comprehensive analysis of the relationship between foreign sponsorship and authoritarian regime survival using an original dataset of all autocratic client regimes in the postwar period. Results demonstrate that patronage from Western powers – the United States, France, and the United Kingdom – is not associated with client regime survival. Instead, only Soviet sponsorship reduces the risk of regime collapse. I explain this variation by considering the effects of foreign sponsorship on the likelihood of military coups d’état. I argue that the Soviet Union directly aided its clients in imposing a series of highly effective coup prevention strategies. In contrast, the United States and its allies did not provide such aid, which left regimes vulnerable to military overthrow.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/2b9t2h
title: Rolling Off the Tongue Into the Top-of-the-Head: Explaining Language Effects on Public Opinion

description: These data and batch files replicate the results reported in the article "Rolling Off the Tongue Into the Top-of-the-Head: Explaining Language Effects on Public Opinion."
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ke7kln
title: Cronograma

description: Cronograma do grupo
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/bqrzk2
title: Civic Engagement and Inequality

description: The Maxwell Poll on Citizenship and Inequality is a nation-wide annual survey. The Poll is directed by Professor Jeff Stonecash. The survey asks questions about engagement in political affairs and other aspects of civic life, as well as views on social and economic inequality in the United States. The Maxwell Poll is an activity of the
&lt;a href="http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/campbell/index.htm"&gt;Campbell Public Affairs Institute&lt;/a&gt; in the &lt;a href="http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/"&gt;Maxwell School&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href="http://www.syr.edu/"&gt;Syracuse University&lt;/a&gt;.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/29834
title: Institutional Repositories in Thai Universities

description: Abstract Institutional Repositories(IR) are infrastructures that ensure accessibility, stability and reliability of research data which requires policies, standards, and data management plan to deposit research data. The scholarly community needs reliable long-term access to research data. The data curation is important for the research community to develop a strategy for long term-use throughout its lifecycle, from creation, storage and dissemination to the time when it is archive. This paper describes an overview of the institutional repositories in Thai universities regarding the issues of the responsible units, the open access policy, the typology of repositories, the digital repositories structure, the catalog description, the format of research output, and the web portal. It also suggests the schemes for facilitating discovery and re-use of research data such as the national research data service and the registry of research data repositories.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/82cwkq
title: Replication data for: Gubernatorial and Presidential Coattails in Brazil

description: In ‘Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses’, we report the results of several replications that we conducted of analyses examining electoral institutions and party systems. One of these replications was of David Samuels’ article ‘The Gubernatorial Coattails Effect: Federalism and Congressional Elections in Brazil’ which appeared in the Journal of Politics in 2000.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;  In an article in the Journal of Politics, Samuels (2000) examines the relative impact of presidential and gubernatorial coattails on the composition of the Brazilian party system. Theory would suggest that temporally-proximate presidential and gubernatorial elections should exert a reductive effect on the number of electoral lists in legislative elections. However, this reductive effect should decline (and may become positive) as the number of presidential and gubernatorial
candidates increases. Samuels argues that the unusual importance of the governor for office-seeking candidates in Brazilian legislative elections means that we should observe a gubernatorial coattails effect but not a presidential coattails effect in Brazil. This would help to explain why the party system at the national level is highly fragmented (6.3 effective parties), while the party
system at the state level is more concentrated (only 3.3 effective parties). The results from three models seem to support his conjecture. However, Samuels draws conclusions from an interaction model that omits constitutive terms. Once these omitted terms are included, none of the coefficients on the variables of interest are significant at the 90% level. Plots of the marginal effect of gubernatorial elections on the number of electoral lists across the observed range of the modifying variable
from all three models indicate that gubernatorial elections never exert a coattails effect. While two of the three models indicate that there is no presidential coattai
ls effect either, one suggests that temporally-proximate presidential elections will increase the number of electoral lists if the number of presidential candidates is sufficiently high. Thus, contrary to the conclusions reached by Samuels, the evidence from a fully-specified model indicates that if there is a coattails effect in Brazilian elections then it is a presidential one and not a gubernatorial one. This indicates that gubernatorial coattails cannot explain why the state party system in Brazil is so much less fragmented than the national party system.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/en4oi
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1847, Docket 1890, SC1/series 230, Petition of William R. Bliss

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Abolition of capital punishment &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13481425"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13481425&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Worcester &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: David Bradford, Plymouth; committee on the judicary &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;William R. Bliss&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;John Templeton&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Albert Gould&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Valentine R. Bullard&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Gerry Valentine&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Charles Richardson&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Joseph W. Holbrook&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;George W. Morse&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Charles H. Fitch&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Lymon Howe&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Andrew March&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Joel C. Clark&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Samuel Flagg&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Horace Gary&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Myron W. Taylor&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Mary Moore&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Sarah Parsons&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Lydia Willard&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Mary F. Jewett&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Marianna M. Sanborn&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Mary Elizabeth Reynolds&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Benjamin Cross&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Fanny Walker&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Charles B. Albert&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Mary Fiske&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1847-03-08 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on March 8, 1847 and referred to the committee on the judiciary &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 481 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 365 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 90 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Unidentified signatures: 26 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, [females], ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: not column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: [numerous fingerprints; includes note, "nearly 500 names"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1847, Docket 1890 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/jj1g3u
title: Replication Data for: Replicating the effects of social media usage in an ethnically polarized setting

description: This repository contains the replication material for the paper "Replicating the effects of social media usage in an ethnically polarized setting" forthcoming in Research & Politics, authored by Nejla Asimovic, Jonathan Nagler, and Joshua A. Tucker, all members of the Center for Social Media and Politics [CSMaP] at NYU.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/9ykw9s
title: California Poll: 2012-001 -- February 2012

description: The Field Poll, established in 1945 as The California Poll by Mervin Field, has operated continuously as an independent, non-partisan, media-sponsored public opinion news service. Each year the Field Polls cover a wide range of political and social topics examining California public opinion. Continuing measures are made of voter support for leading political figures vying for major state and federal offices, job ratings of important political figures and reactions to significant political events. Voter awareness, understanding and predispositions of major campaign issues and salient statewide ballot propositions are also tracked over time.
description: Subject: STANDARD DEPOSIT TERMS 1.0 Type: DATAPASS:TERMS:STANDARD:1.0 Notes: The UCLA Social Science Data Archive (“the Archive”) gives permission and any required licenses to Data-PASS to make the Content available for archiving, preservation and access (with permission of the Archive), within the Data Preservation Alliance for the Social Sciences ("Data-PASS") in accordance with the Data-PASS terms (the "Terms") of use (available from: http://www.icpsr.org/Data-PASS). Including permission to: (a) redisseminate copies of the Data Collection in a variety of distribution formats only according to the standard terms of use of the Archive; (b) promote and advertise the Data Collection in any publicity (in any form) for Data-PASS and the Archive; (c) describe, catalog, validate and document the Content; (d) store, translate, copy or re-format the Data Collection in any way to ensure its future preservation and accessibility, improve usability and/or protect respondent confidentiality; (e) incorporate metadata (cataloging information) or documentation regarding this study into public access catalogues. The Archive represents and warrants that the Content conforms to all Terms and that the Archive is lawfully entitled and has full authority to license Data-Pass to use the Materials in the ways described in the Terms.;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/8hnu55
title: Replication Data for: International Technology Licensing, Intellectual Property Rights, and Tax Havens

description: Review of Economics and Statistics: Forthcoming
description: Volume XX, Issue X
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/kegmk
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1842, Docket 11057, SC1/series 231, Petition of Sylvia A. Ammidon

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: To define rights on railroads &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858181"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858181&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Cambridge &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Frederick Robinson, Middlesex; committee on the petition of Francis Jackson and others &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Sylvia A. Ammidon&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hannah Reed&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Helen E. Garrison&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1842-01-15,1842-01-17 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the Senate on January 15, 1842 and referred to the committee on the petition of Francis Jackson and others and sent for concurrence and received in the House on January 17, 1842 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 135 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 135 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: Yes &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, [females] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1842, Docket 11057 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/2vz5zc
title: ParlGov 2024 Release

description: ParlGov stable version 2024 – 12 August 2024
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/opw1ny
title: GESCAM

description: This is a synthetic dataset for gaze target estimation
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ee7m8m
title: Wright Files I-Z Edited; Docketed Case: 82-1552
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/31idqm
title: Replication Data for: Primary Systems and Candidate Ideology: Evidence from Federal and State Legislative Elections

description: Replication materials for Rogowski, Jon C., and Stephanie Langella. "Primary Systems and Candidate Ideology: Evidence from Federal and State Legislative Elections." American Politics Research.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/edstie
title: Council; Council Files January 23, 1838, Case of Charles Whitford, GC3/series 378, Petition of Charles Whitford

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Execution case &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:12232896"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:12232896&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1837-12-28 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Springfield &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Charles Whitford&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Males of color signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: a colored man, [males of color] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Alfred Jones, William H. Foster, Henry Morris &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Governor Council Files, January 23, 1838, Case of Charles Whitford &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;