cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr35192
title: Arts and Religion Survey 1999 [United States]
title: Archival Version

description: This data set offers information on Americans' opinions about the role of the arts relative to religion. A total of 1,530 respondents were asked questions about their creative and arts-related activities; their attitudes toward the arts; their religious activities, behaviors, beliefs and affiliations; their spiritual (or "uplifting") experiences; their attitudes toward religion and spirituality; the role of the arts in religious contexts; the relationship between art and spirituality; and their involvement in charitable activities. Respondents were also asked for their demographic information including age, sex, race, and income. In-person, in-home interviews were conducted in Spring 1999.
description: In-person, in-home interviews were conducted with a random
national sample of 1,530 non-institutionalized United States adults ages 18 and over, living in the forty-eight contiguous states. The sample is a probability sample down to the block level, after which households and persons within households were selected through an enumeration process. Notably, the Arts and Religion Survey was one of the last surveys that the Gallup Organization did using this methodology. Each interview lasted approximately fifty minutes and included more than 300 questions. The data were collected during the spring of 1999.
description: This data collection contains a weight variable. The variable name is WEIGHT.
description: The survey used a random probability sample. The sampling error is approximately plus or minus 3 percentage points.
description: Datasets: 
DS1: Arts and Religion Survey 1999 [United States]
description: Non-institutionalized adults aged 18 and over in the United States. Smallest Geographic Unit: region
description: face-to-face interviewThe study was designed by Princeton University professor Robert Wuthnow and conducted by the Gallup Organization in Princeton, New Jersey.This data collection was previously distributed by the Cultural Policy and the Arts National Data Archive (CPANDA). The CPANDA Identification Number (study number) is a00082.Quick facts for this data collection, "Places of worship as venues for artistic activities", are available from the Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies (CACPS) at Princeton University.Information regarding data processing for this data collection is in the "Codebook Notes" page(s) in the ICPSR Codebook. Most notably:


The value used for response "Don't know/refused" differs throughout the data collection because it follows the questionnaire. Users may use their discretion to standardize these codes for their own use.
Some variables in this data collection contain unlabeled values.
For this data collection, no documentation was provided for the following variables: Q121H, Q169G, Q173K, D21A, D21B, D21C, REGION, REGION8, CITYSIZE, CTYSIZR, CTYSIZ3, CHSIZE, AGE3, EDUC, RELVIEWS, INCOME, BLACK, and HISP.
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024107/2549764
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024131/2549765
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024142/2549766
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024145/2549767
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024171/2549768
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr36631.v1
title: Los Angeles Metropolitan Area Surveys [LAMAS] 1, 1970
title: Version 1

description: The Los Angeles Metropolitan Area Surveys [LAMAS] 1, 1970 collection features data gathered in 1970 as part of the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area Surveys (LAMAS). The LAMAS, beginning in the spring of 1970, are a shared-time omnibus survey of Los Angeles County community members, usually repeated twice annually. The LAMAS were conducted ten times between 1970 and 1976 in an effort to develop a set of standard community profile measures appropriate for use in the planning and evaluation of public policy. 
The LAMAS instruments, indexes, and scales were used to track the development and course of social indicators (including social, psychological, health, and economic variables) and the impact of public policy on the community. Questions in this survey covered respondents' attitudes toward the following topics: air pollution, health care services in the community, local government politics, police relations, recreation, and leisure time. In addition, participating researchers were given the option of submitting questions to be asked in addition to the core items. Additional question topics included: politics in general, mobility, housing, schools, segregation, and social attitudes and opinions. 
Demographic information collected includes age, race, sex, religion, marital status, education, income, and geographic origin.
description: The goal of the LAMAS studies is the development of a set of standard community profile measures appropriate for use in the planning and evaluation of public policy.
description: The data are not weighted and there are no weight variables present in the dataset.
description: LAMAS 1-3 utilized a three-way controlled sampling of Los Angeles County with the following characteristics: 1. Census tracts were stratified according to median-income deciles, percent-white deciles, and geographic area. 2. A panel of 24 samples was designated and provided with probabilities, according to which a sample of 30 tracts was drawn. 3. These tracts were classified into three groups according to ethnic group, and blocks were sampled with a probability proportional to block size. 4. Housing units were selected systematically from each block after sample rates were calculated. For additional information regarding sampling, please refer to the Producer Documentation.
description: Datasets: 
DS1: Los Angeles Metropolitan Area Surveys [LAMAS] 1, 1970
description: Households in Los Angeles County. Smallest Geographic Unit: Census Tract
description: face-to-face interview
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr36631
title: Los Angeles Metropolitan Area Surveys [LAMAS] 1, 1970
title: Archival Version

description: The Los Angeles Metropolitan Area Surveys [LAMAS] 1, 1970 collection features data gathered in 1970 as part of the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area Surveys (LAMAS). The LAMAS, beginning in the spring of 1970, are a shared-time omnibus survey of Los Angeles County community members, usually repeated twice annually. The LAMAS were conducted ten times between 1970 and 1976 in an effort to develop a set of standard community profile measures appropriate for use in the planning and evaluation of public policy. 
The LAMAS instruments, indexes, and scales were used to track the development and course of social indicators (including social, psychological, health, and economic variables) and the impact of public policy on the community. Questions in this survey covered respondents' attitudes toward the following topics: air pollution, health care services in the community, local government politics, police relations, recreation, and leisure time. In addition, participating researchers were given the option of submitting questions to be asked in addition to the core items. Additional question topics included: politics in general, mobility, housing, schools, segregation, and social attitudes and opinions. 
Demographic information collected includes age, race, sex, religion, marital status, education, income, and geographic origin.
description: The goal of the LAMAS studies is the development of a set of standard community profile measures appropriate for use in the planning and evaluation of public policy.
description: The data are not weighted and there are no weight variables present in the dataset.
description: LAMAS 1-3 utilized a three-way controlled sampling of Los Angeles County with the following characteristics: 1. Census tracts were stratified according to median-income deciles, percent-white deciles, and geographic area. 2. A panel of 24 samples was designated and provided with probabilities, according to which a sample of 30 tracts was drawn. 3. These tracts were classified into three groups according to ethnic group, and blocks were sampled with a probability proportional to block size. 4. Housing units were selected systematically from each block after sample rates were calculated. For additional information regarding sampling, please refer to the Producer Documentation.
description: Datasets: 
DS1: Los Angeles Metropolitan Area Surveys [LAMAS] 1, 1970
description: Households in Los Angeles County. Smallest Geographic Unit: Census Tract
description: face-to-face interview
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024177/2549769
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024187/2549770
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024208/2549771
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024212/2549772
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024218/2549773
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024246/2549774
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr35236.v1
title: Brooklyn Museum Art Controversy Survey 1999 [United States]
title: Version 1

description: This national survey collected data on Americans' attitudes concerning freedom of expression issues arising from the exhibit of an art show at the Brooklyn Museum in the fall of 1999. Debate about the show, titled "Sensation," centered on a painting of the Virgin Mary by British artist Chris Ofili that incorporated some unconventional images into its design. The survey included questions about awareness of the debate, attitudes toward the public display of potentially controversial art, attitudes toward government censorship of art, and attitudes toward public funding of museums that display controversial art. Respondents were also asked for their demographic information including age, sex, and income. A total of 1,005 computer-assisted telephone interviews were conducted between September 29 and October 3, 1999.
description: A total of 1,005 computer-assisted telephone interviews were conducted with a random national random digit dialing sample of Americans over the age of 18, between September 29 and October 3, 1999.
description: The survey included questions about awareness of the debate, attitudes toward the public display of potentially controversial art, attitudes toward government censorship of art, and attitudes toward public funding of museums that display controversial art.
description: This data collection has no weight variables.
description: Response Rates: Response rates are not available.
description: This survey used a random national sample constructed by random digit dialing (RDD).
description: Datasets: 
DS1: Brooklyn Museum Art Controversy Survey 1999 [United States]
description: Adults over 18 years old in the United States. Smallest Geographic Unit: MSA
description: computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI)The survey was conducted for the First Amendment Center by the Center for Survey Research and Analysis (CSRA) at the University of Connecticut.This data collection was previously distributed by the Cultural Policy and the Arts National Archive (CPANDA). The CPANDA Identification Number (study number) for the data collection is a00005.Quick Facts for this data collection, "How Supportive are Americans of Freedom of Expression?" and "Case study: The Brooklyn Museum of Art, 1999", are available from the Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies (CACPS) at Princeton University.Information regarding data processing for this data collection is in the "Codebook Notes" page(s) in the ICPSR Codebook. Most notably:


To protect respondent privacy, variable FIPS "FEDERAL INFORMATION PROCESSING STANDARDS CODE" has been masked.
For this data collection, no documentation was provided for the following variables: FIPS-TZONE and V20.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr35236
title: Brooklyn Museum Art Controversy Survey 1999 [United States]
title: Archival Version

description: This national survey collected data on Americans' attitudes concerning freedom of expression issues arising from the exhibit of an art show at the Brooklyn Museum in the fall of 1999. Debate about the show, titled "Sensation," centered on a painting of the Virgin Mary by British artist Chris Ofili that incorporated some unconventional images into its design. The survey included questions about awareness of the debate, attitudes toward the public display of potentially controversial art, attitudes toward government censorship of art, and attitudes toward public funding of museums that display controversial art. Respondents were also asked for their demographic information including age, sex, and income. A total of 1,005 computer-assisted telephone interviews were conducted between September 29 and October 3, 1999.
description: A total of 1,005 computer-assisted telephone interviews were conducted with a random national random digit dialing sample of Americans over the age of 18, between September 29 and October 3, 1999.
description: The survey included questions about awareness of the debate, attitudes toward the public display of potentially controversial art, attitudes toward government censorship of art, and attitudes toward public funding of museums that display controversial art.
description: This data collection has no weight variables.
description: Response Rates: Response rates are not available.
description: This survey used a random national sample constructed by random digit dialing (RDD).
description: Datasets: 
DS1: Brooklyn Museum Art Controversy Survey 1999 [United States]
description: Adults over 18 years old in the United States. Smallest Geographic Unit: MSA
description: computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI)The survey was conducted for the First Amendment Center by the Center for Survey Research and Analysis (CSRA) at the University of Connecticut.This data collection was previously distributed by the Cultural Policy and the Arts National Archive (CPANDA). The CPANDA Identification Number (study number) for the data collection is a00005.Quick Facts for this data collection, "How Supportive are Americans of Freedom of Expression?" and "Case study: The Brooklyn Museum of Art, 1999", are available from the Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies (CACPS) at Princeton University.Information regarding data processing for this data collection is in the "Codebook Notes" page(s) in the ICPSR Codebook. Most notably:


To protect respondent privacy, variable FIPS "FEDERAL INFORMATION PROCESSING STANDARDS CODE" has been masked.
For this data collection, no documentation was provided for the following variables: FIPS-TZONE and V20.
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024249/2549775
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024255/2549776
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024296/2549777
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024299/2549778
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024304/2549779
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024372/2549780
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024389/2549781
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024402/2549782
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024588/2549783
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024611/2549784
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.15468/dl.vjxgyc
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 14168 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "Country is Mexico",
 "TaxonKey is Smilisca baudinii (Duméril & Bibron, 1841)"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 14168 records from 113 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0012013-250402121839773/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024633/2549785
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024699/2549786
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.15468/dl.nyjc66
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 2438 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "Continent is Asia",
 "DatasetKey is iNaturalist Research-grade Observations",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 "TaxonKey is Pontederia crassipes Mart."
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 2438 records from 1 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0012014-250402121839773/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024714/2549787
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr36679.v1
title: Afrobarometer Round 6: The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Cape Verde, 2014
title: Version 1

description: The Afrobarometer is a comparative series of public attitude surveys that collects and disseminates data regarding Africans' views on democracy, governance, the economy, civil society, and related issues. This particular data collection was concerned with the attitudes and opinions of the citizens of Cape Verde, and also includes a number of "country-specific questions" designed specifically for the Cape Verde survey.
The data are collected from nationally representative samples in face-to-face interviews in the language of the respondent's choice. Standard topics for the Afrobarometer include attitudes toward and evaluations of democracy, governance and economic conditions, political participation, and national identity. In addition, Round 6 surveys included special modules on taxation; tolerance; crime, conflict and insecurity; political corruption; interregional relations; perceptions of China; use of technology; and social service delivery.
The surveys also collect a large set of socio-demographic indicators such as age, gender, education level, poverty level, language and ethnicity, and religious affiliation, as well as political party affiliation. Afrobarometer Round 6 surveys were implemented in 36 countries.
description: The data are not weighted. However, this collection contains the weight variable WITHINWT that should be used in any analysis. This weight was created to account for individual selection probabilities.
description: Response Rates: 76.8%
description: The Afrobarometer uses a clustered, stratified, multi-stage, area probability sample design. The sample is designed as a representative cross-section of all citizens of voting age in a given country. The goal is to give every adult citizen an equal and known chance of selection for interview. This objective is reached by (a) strictly applying random selection methods at every stage of sampling and by (b) applying sampling with probability proportionate to population size wherever possible. A randomly selected sample of 1,200 cases allows inferences to national adult populations with a margin of sampling error of no more than plus or minus 3 percent with a confidence level of 95 percent. If the sample size is increased to 2,400, the confidence interval shrinks to plus or minus 2 percent.
For more information on sampling, please refer to the sampling principles page of the Afrobarometer Web site.
description: Datasets: 
DS1: Afrobarometer Round 6: The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Cape Verde, 2014
description: Citizens aged 18 years or older, excluding institutionalized populations. Smallest Geographic Unit: Region
description: face-to-face interview; paper and pencil interview (PAPI)The Data Collection Instrument is in Portuguese.Additional information on the Afrobarometer Survey can be found on the Afrobarometer Web site.
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024731/2549788
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3024778/2549789
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3025446/2549790
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3025455/2549791
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3025529/2549792
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3025532/2549793
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3025612/2549794
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3025633/2549795
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.25582/data.2024-02.3025687/2549796
title: Data for EMSL Project 60580 from February 2024
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr35568.v1
title: Afrobarometer Round 5: The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Tunisia, 2013
title: Version 1

description: The Afrobarometer is a comparative series of public attitude surveys that collects and disseminates data regarding Africans' views on democracy, governance, the economy, civil society, and related issues. The data are collected from nationally representative samples in face-to-face interviews in the language of the respondent's choice. Standard topics for the Afrobarometer include attitudes toward and evaluations of democracy, governance and economic conditions, political participation, national identify, and social capital. In addition, Round 5 surveys included special modules on taxation; gender issues; crime, conflict and insecurity; globalization; and social service delivery. The surveys also collect a large set of socio-demographic indicators such as age, gender, education level, poverty level, language and ethnicity, and religious affiliation, as well as political party affiliation. Afrobarometer Round 5 surveys were implemented in 35 countries. This particular data collection was concerned with the attitudes and opinions of the citizens of Tunisia, and also includes a number of "country-specific questions" designed specifically for the Tunisia survey.
description: To gauge, analyze, and compare the social, political, and economic atmospheres in African countries.
description: The data are not weighted, however, this collection includes a weight variable (WITHINWT) which should be used when calculating national level statistics. Cases are weighted to account for individual selection probabilities. For additional information on weights, please see the Afrobarometer Round 5 Survey Manual.
description: Response Rates: 43 percent
description: The Afrobarometer uses a clustered, stratified, multi-stage, area probability sample design. The sample is designed as a representative cross-sectionof all citizens of voting age in a given country. The goal is to give every adult citizen an equal and known chance of selection for interview. This objective is reached by (a) strictly applying random selection methods at every stage of sampling and by (b) applying sampling with probability proportionate to population size wherever possible. A randomly selected sample of 1,200 cases allows inferences to national adult populations with a margin of sampling error of no more than plus or minus 3 percent with a confidence level of 95 percent. If the sample size is increased to 2,400, the confidence interval shrinks to plus or minus 2 percent.
description: Datasets: 
DS1: Afrobarometer Round 5: The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Tunisia, 2013
description: Citizens of Tunisia aged 18 years or older. Smallest Geographic Unit: Region
description: face-to-face interview; paper and pencil interview (PAPI)Additional information about the Afrobarometer Survey can be found at the Afrobarometer Web site.