cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17726159
title: Einstein Audit for Faster‑Than‑Light Hidden Sectors (FTL‑only): J‑First SR Envelope, Testability Gate, and A2 Real‑Data Scaffolding

description: This release is a **methods upgrade** to the "Einstein Audit" (FTL-only): a quantitative constraint framework that audits hypothetical superluminal hidden sectors against (i) SR causality risk, (ii) cosmological energy budget (ΔN_eff), and (iii) GW consistency (PTA + ringdown).

## What's new in v1.2.01) **Model-aware SR upgrade ("J-first")**   - The causality channel is expressed primarily through the SR severity functional **J[ρ] = ⟨P(β,W)^2⟩** (exact paradox wedge + paradox strength), rather than only through the small‑FTL proxy ε_FTL².

2) **Einstein “Testability Gate” / bound-existence condition**   - In SR-saturating models (W→∞), J approaches a ceiling **J_max = E[β^4]** set by relativistic mixing.   - A finite bound exists only if ΔN_eff exceeds a threshold:     **ΔN_eff^thr = x_max / (20 J_max)**,     where **x_max = sqrt(1 - y^2 - z^2)** and y=1-PCI, z=ε_pooled/σ_ε.

3) **A2 real-data pipeline scaffolding**   - Adds scripts + templates to replace placeholder/demo anchors with **posterior-level** PTA and ringdown inputs, propagate uncertainty into x_max, and report credible bands for J_bound(ΔN_eff) and ΔN_eff^thr.

4) **Covariance-weighted upgrade**   - Adds starter tooling for χ²-like Einstein tension **T_E = X^T C^{-1} X**, to be used once real joint posteriors/covariances are available.

## Scope & claims- Scope is **FTL-only** (no higher-dimensional content).- Some example numbers remain **REALDATA_APPROX placeholders** until replaced with real posteriors.- This release **does not claim evidence** for FTL; it provides a reproducible auditing / constraint framework.

## Files (high level)- Technical paper + supplements (PDF)- SR “testability gate” notes (PDFs)- A2 scripts/templates for replacing placeholders with real PTA + ringdown posteriors (Python)- README + changelog

## How to citeZenodo mints a DOI per version and a Concept DOI for all versions; cite the specific version DOI for reproducibility, or the Concept DOI to cite the latest version.

Note: Some filenames/notes use internal “v1.3” labeling for the J‑first upgrade; the Zenodo archival release version is v1.2.0.



The SR envelope implied by D_E \le 1 is J \le J_{\rm bound}(\Delta N_{\rm eff}) = x_{\max}/(20\Delta N_{\rm eff}), with x_{\max}=\sqrt{1-y^2-z^2}.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18499411
title: Einstein Audit for Faster‑Than‑Light Hidden Sectors (FTL‑only): J‑First SR Envelope, Testability Gate, and A2 Real‑Data Scaffolding

description: This release is a **methods upgrade** to the "Einstein Audit" (FTL-only): a quantitative constraint framework that audits hypothetical superluminal hidden sectors against (i) SR causality risk, (ii) cosmological energy budget (ΔN_eff), and (iii) GW consistency (PTA + ringdown).

## What's new in v1.2.01) **Model-aware SR upgrade ("J-first")**   - The causality channel is expressed primarily through the SR severity functional **J[ρ] = ⟨P(β,W)^2⟩** (exact paradox wedge + paradox strength), rather than only through the small‑FTL proxy ε_FTL².

2) **Einstein “Testability Gate” / bound-existence condition**   - In SR-saturating models (W→∞), J approaches a ceiling **J_max = E[β^4]** set by relativistic mixing.   - A finite bound exists only if ΔN_eff exceeds a threshold:     **ΔN_eff^thr = x_max / (20 J_max)**,     where **x_max = sqrt(1 - y^2 - z^2)** and y=1-PCI, z=ε_pooled/σ_ε.

3) **A2 real-data pipeline scaffolding**   - Adds scripts + templates to replace placeholder/demo anchors with **posterior-level** PTA and ringdown inputs, propagate uncertainty into x_max, and report credible bands for J_bound(ΔN_eff) and ΔN_eff^thr.

4) **Covariance-weighted upgrade**   - Adds starter tooling for χ²-like Einstein tension **T_E = X^T C^{-1} X**, to be used once real joint posteriors/covariances are available.

## Scope & claims- Scope is **FTL-only** (no higher-dimensional content).- Some example numbers remain **REALDATA_APPROX placeholders** until replaced with real posteriors.- This release **does not claim evidence** for FTL; it provides a reproducible auditing / constraint framework.

## Files (high level)- Technical paper + supplements (PDF)- SR “testability gate” notes (PDFs)- A2 scripts/templates for replacing placeholders with real PTA + ringdown posteriors (Python)- README + changelog

## How to citeZenodo mints a DOI per version and a Concept DOI for all versions; cite the specific version DOI for reproducibility, or the Concept DOI to cite the latest version.

Note: Some filenames/notes use internal “v1.3” labeling for the J‑first upgrade; the Zenodo archival release version is v1.2.0.



The SR envelope implied by D_E \le 1 is J \le J_{\rm bound}(\Delta N_{\rm eff}) = x_{\max}/(20\Delta N_{\rm eff}), with x_{\max}=\sqrt{1-y^2-z^2}.
DOI: 10.6077/j5/t0kv5g
title: American Community Survey, 2000: 1-year Public Use Microdata Sample

description: &lt;p&gt;The American Community Survey (ACS) is a part of the Decennial Census Program and is designed to produce critical information about the characteristics of local communities. The ACS publishes social, housing, and economic characteristics for demographic groups covering a broad spectrum of geographic areas in the United States. Every year the ACS supports the release of single-year estimates for geographic areas with populations of 65,000 or more. Demographic variables include sex, age, relationship, households by type, race, and Hispanic origin. The American Community Survey is conducted under the authority of Title 13, United States Code, Sections 141 and 193, and response is mandatory.&lt;/p&gt;
description: American Community Survey: Public Use Microdata Sample
description: collection_notes: Sites -- Thirty-six counties participated in the 2000 ACS. The primary sampling unit was the housing unit (HU), including all occupants. Persons living in group quarters (GQ) were NOT included in the sample.

Sampling Rates -- In Fort Bend and Harris Counties, TX the overall HU sampling rate was 1 percent. In Broward, FL; Bronx, NY; Lake, IL; San Francisco, CA; and Franklin, OH the overall HU sampling rate was 3 percent. The remaining counties were sampled at 5 percent. The sampling rate within the county varied by the size of the governmental unit the housing unit was in. These sampling rates are provided under the section “ESTIMATION PROCEDURE”. A variable sampling rate was used for the purpose of providing relatively more reliable estimates for small areas. (See accuracy01.pdf)

Collection mode varied; CAPI and CATI phases followed mailings.
DOI: 10.6077/91xe-cy33
title: Gallup/CNN/USA Today Poll #9804015: 1998 Election/Political Parties

description: &lt;p&gt;A poll conducted on April 17-19, 1998 sponsored by CNN/USA Today asked a sample of adults from across the United States their opinions on Bill Clinton's tenure as President.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Please Note&lt;/strong&gt;: This dataset is part of the historical CISER Data Archive Collection and is also available at the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research at &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.25940/ROPER-31088346"&gt;https://doi.org/10.25940/ROPER-31088346&lt;/a&gt;. We highly recommend using the Roper Center version as they may make this dataset available in multiple data formats in the future.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.6077/j5/bnoymu
title: Monthly Electric Utility Sales and Revenue Report with State Distributions, January 1986 - December 1989

description: &lt;p&gt;These files contain data that are submitted to the Energy Information Administration (EIA) by selected electric utilities on Form-826, &quot;Monthly Electric Utility Sales and Revenue Report with State distributions.&quot; Form EIA-826 is used to collect retail sales of electricity (in megawatthours) and associated revenue (in thousands of dollars). Respondents are chosen from a sample of electric utilities in the United States that complete Form EIA-861, &quot;Annual Electric Utility Report.&quot; (See CISER codebook number ECON-070).&lt;/p&gt;
description: Monthly Electric Utility Sales and Revenue Report with State Distributions
description: version_history: Version 3(?) -added converted csv data file and accompanying read me file. 31 AUG 2021 -jb
DOI: 10.6077/26a0-dp04
title: Community Indicators Survey, 1999

description: &lt;p&gt;This cumulative file contains the data from one national and 26 local surveys conducted in 1999 as part of the Knight Foundation's Community Indicators Project. The surveys measured civic engagement and attitudes concerning seven topic areas: education, arts and culture, children and social welfare, community development, homelessness, literacy, and citizenship. Questions relating specifically to arts and culture include frequency of attendance at arts events or museums, satisfaction with arts and cultural opportunities, and satisfaction with the performance of local cultural institutions. The interview protocol for each local area survey was nearly identical to the protocol for the national survey also conducted for this project. The Community Indicators Project was undertaken to document the social health of the 26 communities in which the Knight brothers published newspapers. The study was conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates and funded by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Please Note&lt;/strong&gt;: This dataset is part of the historical CISER Data Archive Collection and is also available at the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research at &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.25940/ROPER-31096635"&gt;https://doi.org/10.25940/ROPER-31096635&lt;/a&gt;. We highly recommend using the Roper Center version as they may make this dataset available in multiple data formats in the future.&lt;/p&gt;
description: collection_notes: Sample Notes: National adult N = 1206, Residents N = 16211

See uspra1999-comm.pdf for a listing of the cities sampled separately from the national sample.
DOI: 10.6077/j5/oe97pj
title: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall Enrollment in Postsecondary Institutions, Fall 1986 (IPEDS I)

description: &lt;p&gt;This data collection contains data from the Fall Enrollment (FE) survey, which is conducted annually as part of the National Center for Education Statistics' Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). This survey collects data on the number of students enrolled in postsecondary institutions in the United States and its outlying areas. All institutions on this file are eligible to participate in Title IV programs (financial aid). The data include information for 8,741 institutions in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the outlying areas. The level of detail requested on each survey form depended on the highest level of offering of the institution and accreditation status. The types of data include race/ethnicity of student, attendance status, student level, degree-seeking status, year of study, age of student, residence of first-time students, and major field of study.&lt;/p&gt;
description: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall Enrollment in Postsecondary Institutions
description: collection_notes: Similar surveys have been conducted since 1956 under the Higher Education General Information Survey (HEGIS).

The sampling frame used for this sample was the best available as of September 3, 1986, and contained 7,458 institutions. This included 1,633 institutions for which type (4-year, 2-year, less-than-two-year) and/or control (public, private
nonprofit, private for profit) were not known. These were assumed to be private for profit less-than-two-year institutions, because information on the institutions in the other sectors was much more complete than for this sector.
DOI: 10.6077/j5/uceuc9
title: Industry-Occupation Matrix, 1982-1995

description: &lt;p&gt;The National Industry-Occupation Employment Matrix is developed by the Bureau of Labor Statistics as part of its ongoing Employment Projections program.&lt;/p&gt;
description: Industry-Occupation Matrix
description: collection_notes: Separate estimates of current employment are developed for wage and salary workers in OBS survey industries, for wage and salary workers in agriculture and private households, and for self-employed and unpaid family workers. Data on wage and salary worker employment are prepared by detailed occupation for each industry. Estimates of occupational employment of self-employed and unpaid family workers are prepared at the total {all~industry) level only. They are added to the total of wage and salary workers to derive total employment by detailed occupation for the entire economy.
DOI: 10.6077/b89m-bb57
title: Higher Education General Information Survey (HEGIS): Salaries, Tenure and Fringe Benefits of Full-time Instructional Faculty, 1984/1985, HEGIS XIX

description: &lt;p&gt;This survey collects salaries of administrators (Part 1), salaries of academic Deans and full-time resident faculty (Part 2), and the fringe benefits for academic Deans and full-time resident faculty. Fringe benefits are defined as cash contributions in the form of supplementary of deferred compensation other than salary. The employee's contribution should be excluded when determining the dollar value of the fringe benefit.&lt;/p&gt;
description: Higher Education General Information Survey (HEGIS): Salaries, Tenure and Fringe Benefits
DOI: 10.6077/gke9-hx50
title: Population Estimates by County with Components of Change, 1981-1985

description: &lt;p&gt;For all counties or county equivalents, this file provides provisional population estimates for July 1, 1985 as well as revised population estimates for July 1 of 1981, 1982, 1983, and 1984. Also included are data on net migration and the number of births and deaths from 1980 to 1985. (Source: downloaded from ICPSR 7/13/10)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Please Note&lt;/strong&gt;: This dataset is part of the historical CISER Data Archive Collection and is also available at ICPSR at &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08613.v1"&gt;https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08613.v1&lt;/a&gt;. We highly recommend using the ICPSR version as they may make this dataset available in multiple data formats in the future.&lt;/p&gt;
description: Population Estimates by County with Components of Change
DOI: 10.6077/z2w1-ax66
title: Gallup News Service Poll: Gambling/Alcohol, 1996

description: &lt;p&gt;This survey was conducted by the Gallup Organization on a National sample of 1,004 adults on June 27-30, 1996. Major topics covered: 1996 Election; Clinton job performance; the FBI file; alcohol; gambling; tobacco products; churches; religious preference; born-again Christianity; importance of religion; race relations; burning of black churches; names of political leaders; names of well-known figures.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Please Note&lt;/strong&gt;: This dataset is part of the historical CISER Data Archive Collection and is also available at the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research at &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.25940/ROPER-31088751"&gt;https://doi.org/10.25940/ROPER-31088751&lt;/a&gt;. We highly recommend using the Roper Center version as they may make this dataset available in multiple data formats in the future.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.6077/kdvq-0c02
title: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Earned Degrees (Completions), 1995-1996

description: &lt;p&gt;This data collection contains information on degrees earned at a sample of postsecondary institutions in the United States. The survey collected data on the number of completions of academic, vocational, and continuing professional educational programs by award category. There are four files in the collection. Part 1, Institutional Characteristics, is a comprehensive file pertaining to the characteristics of all the institutions surveyed (i.e., religious affiliation, highest level of offering, enrollment by race/ethnicity, Carnegie classification, etc.). Part 2, Postsecondary Completions: Awards/Degrees Conferred, contains the number of degrees and other awards granted by the institution in each field of study (CIP code), by level of award/degree, and by race/ethnicity and sex of recipient, with totals for full-time and part-time new and continuing students. Part 3, Clarifying Questions, contains responses to the two clarifying questions included in the survey: (1) number of double majors by level of degree and sex of recipient, and (2) number of awards/degrees by branches located in foreign countries, by level of award/degree, and by sex of recipient. Part 4, CIP Codes and Titles, provides a detailed list of the Classification of Instructional Programs codes and their titles found in the data files. (Source: downloaded from ICPSR 7/13/10)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Please Note&lt;/strong&gt;: This dataset is part of the historical CISER Data Archive Collection and is also available at ICPSR at &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02680.v1"&gt;https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02680.v1&lt;/a&gt;. We highly recommend using the ICPSR version as they may make this dataset available in multiple data formats in the future.&lt;/p&gt;
description: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Earned Degrees
DOI: 10.6077/j5/mojefz
title: World Population Data Sheet, 1994

description: &lt;p&gt;The Data Sheet lists all geopolitical entities with populations of 150,000 or more and all members of the UN. These include sovereign states, dependencies, overseas departments, and some territories whose status or boundaries may be undetermined or in dispute. Regional population totals are independently rounded and include small countries or areas not shown. Regional and world rates and percentages are weighted averages of countries for which data are available; regional averages are shown when data or estimates are available for at least three-quarters of the region's population. Variables include population, birth and death rate, rate of natural increase, population &quot;doubling time&quot;, estimated population for 2010 and 2025, infant mortality rate, total fertility rate, population under age 15/over age 65, life expectancy at birth, urban population, contraceptive use, per capita GNP, and government view of current birth rate. NOTE: This file is a compilation of demographic data from various sources. The data values are the same as those published in PRB's World Data Sheet, but this file also contains some underlying population figures used to calculate the rates and percentages.&lt;/p&gt;
description: collection_notes: This file is a compilation of demographic data from various sources. The data values are the same as those published in PRB's World Data Sheet, but this file also contains some underlying population figures used to calculate the rates and percentages.

The Data Sheet lists all geopolitical entities with populations of 150,000 or more and all members of the UN. These include sovereign states, dependencies, overseas departments, and some territories whose status or boundaries may be undetermined or in dispute. More developed regions, following the UN classification, comprise all of Europe and North America, plus Australia, Japan, and New Zealand. All other regions and countries are classified as less developed.
DOI: 10.6077/7ka8-zy50
title: Small Business Survey, 1998

description: &lt;p&gt;Survey of Heads of Companies &amp; Orgs. With 4-99 Employees. Questions include: Employees paid $30,000 per year (1); benefits for full-time employees (4); federal budget surplus (1); satisfaction with health care system (3); Patients' Bill of Rights (5); Company health Insurance (17); Managed Core Plans (11); Problems with companies Insurance (4); Subsidized health insurance (1); employees own health insurance (2); Law &amp; regulations for managed health care plans (26); Problems with managed care plans (6) (Source: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Please Note&lt;/strong&gt;: This dataset is part of the historical CISER Data Archive Collection and is also available at the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research at &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.25940/ROPER-31096607"&gt;https://doi.org/10.25940/ROPER-31096607&lt;/a&gt;. We highly recommend using the Roper Center version as they may make this dataset available in multiple data formats in the future.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.6077/j5/uig7b1
title: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Salaries, Tenure, and Fringe Benefits of Full-time Instructional Faculty, 1992/1993

description: &lt;p&gt;The primary purpose of this survey is to collect data on the salaries, tenure, and fringe benefits of full-time instructional faculty by contract length, sex, and academic rank. These data permit analysis, from a national perspective, of the number and tenure status of full-time faculty members in relation to enrollment and number of degrees granted, and the evaluation of faculty compensation in relation to institutional financial resources for an indication of the economic status of institutions. These data also enable trend analysis of average full-time salaries for an assessment of the economic status of full-time faculty. Part 1, Response Status Information, contains response status information to the salary and fringe benefits survey for active institutions in the final universe. Part 2, Salaries and Tenure of Full-Time Instructional Faculty, contains salary and tenure data. Salary data include total salary outlays and the total number of instructional faculty that were paid those outlays. Tenure data include number of faculty with tenure, number on tenure track, and number not on tenure track. Part 3, Fringe Benefits of Full-Time Instructional Faculty, contains benefits data. Benefits data include fringe benefit expenditures and the number of full-time faculty covered by retirement, medical/dental, and group life insurance plans. (Source: ICPSER, retrieved 07/19/2011&lt;/p&gt;
description: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Salaries, Tenure and Fringe Benefits of Full-time Instructional Faculty
description: collection_notes: The exclusions are:
 
a. All of the instructional faculty at this institution are employed on a part-time basis
 
b. All of the instructional faculty at this institution are military personnel
 
c. All of the instructional faculty at this institution contribute their services (e.g., are members of a religious order)
 
d. All of the instructional faculty at this institution teach preclinical or clinical medicine
DOI: 10.6077/j5/hxxhug
title: Cornell National Social Survey (CNSS), 2009

description: &lt;p&gt;Cornell National Social Survey is a random-sample survey of adults aged 18 and over. In 2009, participants were asked their opinions on a range of topics including the role of the Bible in daily life, immigration policy and attitudes toward immigrants, communication in the workplace, importance of personal financial wellbeing and mental health, reasons why people commit crimes, ethnic profiling in law enforcement, and use of virtual world technology. The survey also asks if respondents had spoken up in the context of workplace or social conflict situations, factors influencing their voting behavior and personal beliefs, efforts to lose weight, plans to move from their current residence, frequency of family meals, and household expenditures.&lt;/p&gt;
description: Cornell National Social Survey
description: collection_notes: The survey sample, provided by Marketing Systems Group, consists of a Random Digit Dial (RDD) list within the continental United States. The sample selection procedure ensures that every listed household within the United States has an equal chance to be included in the survey and that, once the household is contacted, every adult in the household has an equal probability of being included in the study.