cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t38
title: "Run2_dcs10" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Excitation function at cos(Theta_eta)= -0.208
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t39
title: "Run2_dcs11" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Excitation function at cos(Theta_eta)= -0.125
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t40
title: "Run2_dcs12" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Excitation function at cos(Theta_eta)= -0.042
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t41
title: "Run2_dcs13" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Excitation function at cos(Theta_eta)= 0.042
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t42
title: "Run2_dcs14" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Excitation function at cos(Theta_eta)= 0.125
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t44
title: "Run2_dcs16" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Excitation function at cos(Theta_eta)= 0.292
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t45
title: "Run2_dcs17" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Excitation function at cos(Theta_eta)= 0.375
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t46
title: "Run2_dcs18" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Excitation function at cos(Theta_eta)= 0.458
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t48
title: "Run2_dcs20" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Excitation function at cos(Theta_eta)= 0.625
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.t6ty9d
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 0 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "ScientificName is Handroanthus heptaphyllus",
 "HasCoordinate is true"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 0 records from 0 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0015946-251025141854904/datasets/export for details.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t43
title: "Run2_dcs15" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Excitation function at cos(Theta_eta)= 0.208
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t47
title: "Run2_dcs19" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Excitation function at cos(Theta_eta)= 0.542
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t49
title: "Run2_dcs21" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Excitation function at cos(Theta_eta)= 0.708
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t50
title: "Run2_dcs22" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Excitation function at cos(Theta_eta)= 0.792
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t51
title: "Run2_dcs23" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Excitation function at cos(Theta_eta)= 0.875
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t52
title: "Run2_dcs24" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Excitation function at cos(Theta_eta)= 0.958
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t54
title: "Run3_eta_dcs02" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Differential cross section at c.m. energy 1.8933 GeV
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t55
title: "Run3_eta_dcs03" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Differential cross section at c.m. energy 1.8997 GeV
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t56
title: "Run3_eta_dcs04" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Differential cross section at c.m. energy 1.9061 GeV
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.25549/vercoutere-ouc110610508
title: Woman with a baby, boy with a cat, man with a bucket plus word salad

description: One black and purple nude female with black hair lifting an orange and yellow nude baby wth orange hair next to a potted plant with a purple cat on her lap; orange boy with orange hair wearing yellow shorts with suspenders next to a plant and a brown cat; outside beside a tree, a male with brown hair wearig an orange shirt and red pants is holding a red bucket; area around figures is painted red or orange; a word salad printed in magenta covers the remainder of the page and some of the other areas of the painting. See description of 347 for OT notes.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t53
title: "Run3_eta_dcs01" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Differential cross section at c.m. energy 1.8876 GeV
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t58
title: "Run3_eta_dcs06" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Differential cross section at c.m. energy 1.9189 GeV
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t59
title: "Run3_eta_dcs07" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Differential cross section at c.m. energy 1.9252 GeV
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t60
title: "Run3_eta_dcs08" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Differential cross section at c.m. energy 1.9315 GeV
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t61
title: "Run3_eta_dcs09" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Differential cross section at c.m. energy 1.9378 GeV
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.116258.v1/t62
title: "Run3_eta_dcs10" of "Study of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction at MAMI"

description: Differential cross section at c.m. energy 1.9441 GeV
description: A2 at MAMI. Differential cross sections for $\eta$ and $\eta'$ photoproduction on proton were measured from their
thresholds up to the c.m. energy W=1.96 GeV and full production angle coverage. The corresponding total
cross sections were also measured. Results of the analysis of three independent data sets (Run 1, Run 2, Run 3)
from different periods of data taking are presented. The errors of all data points represent statistical uncertainties
combined with the angular dependent systematic ones. The overall systematic uncertainty resulting from the calculation
of the detection efficiency and the photon beam flux was estimated as 4% for Run 1 and Run 2, and as 5% for Run 3.
The data was obtained with Crystal Ball/TAPS experimental setup.