cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/bte6pt
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1855, Docket 18373, SC1/series 231, Petition of William Pulsifer

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: For the removal of Edward Greeley Loring &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858574"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858574&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Massachusetts &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Charles W. Slack, Boston; committee on federal relations &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;William Pulsifer&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hosea Jewell&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;John Gardner&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1855-03-20,1855-03-21 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on March 20, 1855 and referred to the committee on federal relations and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on March 21, 1855 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 53 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 53 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: legal voters, ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Reverend next to signatures &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1855, Docket 18373 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.15468/dl.udyfks
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 146326 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "TaxonKey" : [
 "is Popillia japonica Newman, 1838"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 146326 records from 141 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0015076-250525065834625/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/4mu52n
title: Validation of ecological indicators to evaluate sustainability of forest management in Humid tropics, with emphasis on forests with high conservation value.

description: This study quantifies the impacts of different intensities of tree harvesting on indicators of stand structure and composition and on butterflies communities in a certified forest in the North Atlantic Autonomous Region of Nicaragua. The impacts on the three indicators were assessed by determining thresholds of acceptable/unacceptable levels of change based on existent methodologies. The use of thresholds is a useful tool to demonstrate the impact level of different management practices. Indicators were measured in three forests: forest with low harvesting (ABI), forest with high harvesting (AAI) and a forest without harvesting, used as a control (BR). Vegetation density, basal area and palm abundance was measured considering only individuals with DBH&gt;10cm, in temporal 50m x 50m plots. Canopy openness and vertical structure was assessed in 10m x 10m temporal plots. Butterfly communities were evaluated in 500m transects, distributed in such a manner as to include all different environments within the forest.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/51fm4s
title: Replication Data for: Social Networks and Protest Participation

description: The data and code provided here enable the replication of all analyses in "Social Networks and Protest Participation", Jenn Larson, Jonathan Nagler, Jonathan Ronen, Joshua Tucker.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/58useb
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 22,184
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/hsoyy
title: Passed Resolves; Resolves 1867, SC1/series 228, Petition of Leonard A. Grimes

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Against the ratification of the fourteenth amendment &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10956312"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10956312&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Boston &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Charles L. Mitchell, Boston; committee on federal relations &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Leonard A. Grimes&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Charles Lenox Remond&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;George H.W. Stewart&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Lewis Hayden&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;John V. de Grasse&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Robert Morris&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1867-01-25,1867-01-26 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on January 25, 1867 and referred to the committee on federal relations and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on January 26, 1867 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 35 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 35 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: loyal citizens, [males of color], ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: not column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Resolves 1867, passed March 20, 1867 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/hucmd
title: Council; Council Files September 22, 1843, Case of Isaac Leavitt, GC3/series 378, Petition of Josiah D. Sturtevant

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Execution case &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:12232941"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:12232941&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Mattapoisett &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Josiah D. Sturtevant&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Thomas J. Southworth&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Abner Harlow&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 78 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 78 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Isaac Leavitt &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Governor Council Files, September 22, 1843, Case of Isaac Leavitt &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/d7qqhd
title: Rivalry or Repression? Rethinking the Logic of Violence against Civilians in Conventional Civil Wars

description: What explains the perpetration of violence against civilians in the context of conventional civil wars? In contrast to the argument made by Balcells (2010), in this paper we argue that patterns of violence towards civilians are not determined by prewar levels of political competition or rivalry but are rather largely driven by a logic of repression. Civilians are more likely to be executed in localities with widespread support for the enemy. However, because identifying, rounding up, and killing targeted individuals requires organization and information, this repression is only observed when supporters of the side in control of the territory possess a minimum level of political organization. Reanalyzing Balcells' (2010) data on executions in 1,062 Catalonian municipalities during the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939), we demonstrate that a logic of repression, not rivalry, best explains the patterns of leftist violence towards civilians.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/dzbfrg
title: Replication Data for: Eleições no Brasil antes da democracia: o Código Eleitoral de 1932 e os pleitos de 1933 e 1934

description: In this paper, we aim to understand the process of the Brazilian party and electoral systems' reconfiguration after 1930 and before the first democratic period in the country (1945-1964). Our analysis is focused in two stages: In the relationship between political elites and the formation of a new political and institutional order in the country, and in the effects of institutional changes on the political competition and political representation. Based on new data, we demonstrate that the elections held in 1933 and 1934 were the first plural and competitive elections in Brazil, where the possibility of assuming the office was guaranteed to the opposition. Thus, these elections expose a very different scenario from the one often presented by the consolidated literature on the First Republic of Brazil.
description: The data used in the article were gathered from the 1932, 1933, 1934, and 1935 Electoral Bulletins of the Brazilian Superior Electoral Court (TSE). These data were collected through consultations conducted by the authors in daily visits to the Brazilian Studies Institute (IEB) at the University of São Paulo. The original files are located at the IEB physical archives.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/jll5wu
title: Replication Data for: THE EFFECT OF A STATE INCOME TAX ON MIGRATION: THE EXAMPLE OF CONNECTICUT

description: State level income tax policy is a hotly debated topic in both the academic and political spheres. While economic theory and some empirical analyses suggest that larger income tax burdens affect migration decisions, there also is a good deal of empirical evidence showing that tax policy has little to no effect. This lack of consensus in the academic literature is echoed in the political world, where many states are debating whether to eliminate income taxes or reduce rates as a means of spurring economic growth. Connecticut’s adoption of an income tax in 1991 provides a unique opportunity to analyze the impact of a sizable income tax policy change on migration. The results suggest that Connecticut’s income tax deterred movement into the state but had no impact on exit from the state resulting in a net loss in migration.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/pollyvote2012
title: Replication data for: Accuracy of combined forecasts for the 2012 Presidential Election: The PollyVote

description: We review the performance of the PollyVote, which combined forecasts from polls, prediction markets, expertsâ judgment, political economy models, and index models to forecast the two-party popular vote in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election. Throughout the election year the PollyVote provided highly accurate forecasts, outperforming each of its component methods, as well as the forecasts from FiveThirtyEight.com. Gains in accuracy were particularly large early in the campaign, when uncertainty about the election outcome is typically high. The results confirm prior research showing that combining is one of the most effective approaches to generating accurate forecasts.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/htkb86
title: Replication data for: Inequality & Unemployment, Redistribution & Insurance, and Participation: Veto Actors and Deadlock; Collective Action and Common Pools; Bargaining and Compromise

description: Conflicts of interest over the generosity and structure of redistribution and social insurance (call these jointly: social policy) include that between the relatively poor and wealthy—which theoretically produces the famous median-voter result that democratic demand for broad redistribution increases in the income skew—and that between the safely employed and the unemployed and precariously employed—which yields a different theoretical result, namely that inequality reduces median-voter demand for social insurance. In each case, the generosity and structure of social policy may itself affect simultaneously the efficiency of the labor market and the political participation of society’s less fortunate, which affects the identity and so the income and job-security status of the median voter. These considerations imply several endogenous relationships between economic performance (employment/income level and distribution), social policy (redistribution and social insurance), and political participation. This paper will elaborate the theoretically expected nature of these endogenous relationships, suggest identification conditions that derive from the theory and substance, and offer empirical estimates of the resulting system of equations.
description: Subject: STANDARD DEPOSIT TERMS 1.0 Type: DATAPASS:TERMS:STANDARD:1.0 Notes: This study was deposited under the of the Data-PASS standard deposit terms. A copy of the usage agreement is included in the file section of this study.;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/9jbeh7
title: Passed Resolves; Resolves 1906, c.65, SC1/series 228, Petition of James E. Brummell

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Racial discrimination &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25500519"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25500519&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Massachusetts &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: James Sidney Allen, Brockton &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;James E. Brummell&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Edward F. Louis&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Irving Prince&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Willie L. Cary&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Theodore Brummell&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;John A. Young&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Henry McDonald&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;William H. Rayster&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Alfred Hilliard&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Joseph Carter&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Albert Bryant&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Henry H. Hamilton&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;John J. Rawlins&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1906-04-10 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on April 10, 1906 and placed on file &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 28 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, placed on file &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 28 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, [males of color], ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Jamestown Tercentennial Exposition, Virginia, towns next to names including Brockton &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Resolves 1906, c.65, passed May 7, 1906 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/hpbp5b
title: Massachusetts Archives Collection. v.182-Revolution Petitions, 1777. SC1/series 45X, Petition of Tamson Moody

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Permission to travel &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13909108"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13909108&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1777-04-02 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Boston &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Tamson Moody&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1777-04-05,1777-04-06 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on April 5, 1777 and resolved and sent for concurrence and received in the Council on April 6, 1777 and read and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, resolved, sent, received, read, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: Yes &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: [females] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: John Moody, Halifax, Margaret Ball, Captain Eayers &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Massachusetts Archives volume 182, pages 319-320 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/hsrkbo
title: Two level acceptance data for CFC project

description: Demographics plus CFC-12 data
DOI: 10.15468/dl.kaaxuw
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 2 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "DatasetKey is Deuteromycetes externi",
 "Country is Croatia"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 2 records from 1 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0006673-250525065834625/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.3c2cct
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 5 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "DatasetKey is Bell Museum bryophytes",
 "Country is Croatia"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 5 records from 1 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0006674-250525065834625/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17649174
title: Dataset for "A Smart Manufacturing Approach to Enhancing the Reliability of Visual Inspection in the Automotive Industry"

description: Open Data

The dataset supporting the findings of this study is openly available in the Zenodo repository under the title “A Smart Manufacturing Approach to Enhancing the Reliability of Visual Inspection in the Automotive Industry”, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17649175.

The dataset includes anonymized production-inspection records collected during the smart-manufacturing improvement initiative in the automotive industry. Specifically, it comprises monthly data on loading time, downtime, retry time, operating time, total output, cycle time, and calculated OEE components (Availability, Performance, and Quality rates). It also contains sensor capability index (Cpk) measurements reflecting the accuracy and stability of the camera-based visual inspection system before and after the intervention. All data have been fully anonymized and do not contain product codes, machine identifiers, operational timestamps, financial indicators, or any personally identifiable information (PII). The dataset is strictly technical in nature and is statistically consistent with the reliability and performance trends reported in the study, thereby enabling transparency, reproducibility, and methodological validation while adhering to ethical and corporate data-governance requirements.

Open Contributorship

This research was conducted collaboratively by the author team from the Industrial Engineering Department, BINUS Online Learning, Bina Nusantara University, following the Open Contributorship principles and the CRediT taxonomy.

Andryan Nugraha contributed to Conceptualization, Problem Formulation, Methodology, Data Curation, and Formal Analysis, including OEE computation, downtime evaluation, sensor capability assessment (Cpk), and pre and post improvement studies, ensuring data consistency, completeness, and anonymization for open-data publication.

Hubertus Davy Yulianto provided Supervision, Methodological Validation, and Review of Analytical Rigor, ensuring alignment with industrial engineering principles, visual inspection system design, and applied manufacturing research standards.

Irma Ratna Avianti was responsible for Technical Review, Quality Assurance, Refinement of Interpretation, and Writing, including Review and Editing, guiding discussion formulation, validation of inspection system improvements, and adherence to academic writing and publication standards.

The author team collectively handled Visualization, Manuscript Finalization, and Dataset Documentation, ensuring coherent presentation of results, figures, and supplementary materials for Zenodo publication.

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript and take full responsibility for its accuracy, integrity, and scholarly quality. The authors endorse the Open Contributorship framework and commit to making associated datasets, analytical templates, and methodological resources openly accessible to support replication, industrial application, and wider academic dissemination.