cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.25549/gar-c81-1172
title: Miss R. Albright, letter, 1932-11-01, to Hamlin Garland

description: Miss R. Albright (The Versemaker), Brazil, Indiana, USA, letter, 1932 November 1, to Hamlin Garland, 2045 DeMille Drive, Hollywood, California, USA. "By separate cover I am sending to you two copies…" -- first line.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxlu
title: Witness file: Adams, Dr. Reed (1 of 3), 1986 Sept. 5 - 1991 July 17

description: Witness file: Adams, Dr. Reed (1 of 3), 1986 September 5 - 1991 July 17. PART OF A SERIES: The circumstances surrounding the beating of Rodney King led many to believe that the incident was racially motivated and reflected a spirit of bias and discrimination within the LAPD. Irell & Manella analyzed in depth the LAPD's recruitment, hiring, training, and promotion practices to determine if bias and intolerance were in fact pervasive issues within the Department. The series includes materials related to Irell and Manella's work product, including the firm’s correspondence; summaries of personnel files for potential recruits; records of the Leon Panduro case, in which a citizen was shot by a probationary officer; minutes from the LAPD Professional Advisory Committee maintained between 1983 and 1991; witness files, which consist of written testimony and supplemental materials; and notes, outlines, and drafts maintained over the course of Irell and Manella’s investigation.1. Silverman, memo, 1991-07-17, to Dewell2. Graysen, letter, 1991-07-08, to Silverman3. Adams, Independent Commission on the LAPD report appendices, 1991-07-044. Graysen, letter, 1991-06-27, to Silverman5. Adams, Misconduct of the LAPD in the areas of racism, sexism & resistance to improvement in human relations, 1991-06-276. Adams, Independent Commission on the LAPD report appendices, 1991-07-047. Adams curriculum vitae, 19918. Adams, memo, 1988-09-01, to Sandburg9. Police training administrator, class specification, 1986-09-0510. The "Kroeker report", 1988-08-1011. Jones, memo, 1986-10-08, to Rathburn
DOI: 10.25549/gar-c81-1288
title: Hamlin Garland, letter, 1914-08-05, to Edmund N. Allen

description: Hamlin Garland, letter, 1914 August 5, to Edmund N. Allen (State Penitentiary), 1125 Collins Street, Joliet, Illinois, USA. "Wont you sit down and talk to you stenographer…" -- first line.
DOI: 10.25549/gar-c81-1064
title: George Ade, letter, 1917-09-30, to H.S. Lathan

description: George Ade (Hazelden Farm), Brook, Indiana, USA, letter, 1917 September 30, to H.S. Lathan (The MacMillan Company), 64 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York, USA. "I thank you very much for Hamlin Garland's new book "A Son of the Middle Border." -- first line.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxxu
title: Stein, memo, 1991-06-27, to Richards; Statistics, 1989-1991

description: Sylvia Stein (Latham & Watkins), 633 West 5th Street, Los Angeles, California, USA, memorandum, 1991 June 27, to Kim Richards, re Crime and violence statistics and LAPD demographics. With: 1) Table 1. Index of crime, United States, 1980-1989; 2) Tables 5 and 6. Offenses known to the police... years 1980-1988 (note: 1983, 1986, and 1989 statistics were unavilable at the time this research was completed); 3) Table 7. Law enforcement officers assaulted, 1980-1989, type of weapon and percent receiving personal injury; 4) Table 12. Law enforcement officers feloniously killed, 1980-1989, cercumstances at scene of incident; 5) Sworn personnel by rank, sex, and ethnicity, February 21, 1991; 6) Sworn personnel by rank, pay grade within rank, and age; 7) Illness / Injury statistical report, 1990 annual report. Independent Commission: Case Summaries of the 83 Selected Cases (1 of 4). PART OF A SERIES: Latham & Watkins researched a total of 83 civil litigation cases brought against the LAPD pertaining to excessive force and/or improper tactics to ascertain whether the Rodney King incident was in fact the aberration that Chief Daryl Gates described. Included in the series are several materials related to the firm’s investigation and final work product. Specifically, the series contains source materials related to the 83 cases that were studied. These materials include the firm’s own memoranda and notes, statistics on misconduct and police brutality, summaries of the selected cases, recommendations for settlement drafted by the Office of the City Attorney, docket cards, copies of settlement agreements, a master roster of officers named in the civil suits, and excerpts from officers’ personnel files. Also included are summaries of interviews held with police personnel and aggrieved citizens about their perception of problems within the LAPD.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.fnby99
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 48 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "BasisOfRecord is Specimen",
 "Country is one of (Costa Rica, Colombia, Panama, Ecuador, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Peru)",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 "TaxonKey is Phylloporus centroamericanus"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 48 records from 5 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0024015-251025141854904/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxxr
title: Independent Commission memoranda, 1991 Apr. 20 - June 20

description: Independent Commission memoranda, 1991 April 20 - June 20. Miscellaneous correspondance, memos, etc. PART OF A SERIES: Latham & Watkins researched a total of 83 civil litigation cases brought against the LAPD pertaining to excessive force and/or improper tactics to ascertain whether the Rodney King incident was in fact the aberration that Chief Daryl Gates described. Included in the series are several materials related to the firm’s investigation and final work product. Specifically, the series contains source materials related to the 83 cases that were studied. These materials include the firm’s own memoranda and notes, statistics on misconduct and police brutality, summaries of the selected cases, recommendations for settlement drafted by the Office of the City Attorney, docket cards, copies of settlement agreements, a master roster of officers named in the civil suits, and excerpts from officers’ personnel files. Also included are summaries of interviews held with police personnel and aggrieved citizens about their perception of problems within the LAPD.1. Meinicke, memo, 1991-06-03, to Spiegel2. Meinicke, fax, 1991-06-03, to Spiegel3. Sherrell, memo, 1991-04-20, re 4/19/91 interview with City Attorney's Office4. Chaplick, letter, 1991-04-25, to Hokinson5. Sherrell, memo, 1991-04-26, re City Attorneys files - Civil litigation6. Conway, memo, 1991-04-29, re Map of LAPD precincts7. Richards, memo, 1991-05-01, to Getto8. Richards, memo, 1991-05-01, to Getto9. Thomas, letter, 1991-04-30, to Richards10. Chaplick, memo, 1991-05-15, to Spiegel11. Chaplick, memo, 1991-05-15, to Spiegel12. Chaplick, memo, 1991-05-28, to Sherrell13. Chaplick, memo, 1991-05-28, to Sherrell14. Christopher, memo, 1991-06-07, to Spiegel15. Saunders, memo, 1991-06-20, to Huebner
DOI: 10.25549/gar-c81-1121
title: Hamlin Garland, letter, [no year]-04-03, to Carl Ethan Akeley

description: Hamlin Garland, letter, [no year] April 3, to Carl Ethan Akeley. "You know how much I like your lion and so you will understand…" -- first line.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxvt
title: Documents: LA DA's Office materials, 1987 Dec. - 1990

description: Documents: LA DA's Office materials, 1987 December - 1990. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.1. Election violations official misconduct pamphlet, 1987-122. Special Investigations Division pamphlet, 1987-123. Felony / misdemeanor complaints (1989-1990), [1991?]4. Criminal justice II work flow, [s.d.]5. Livesay, résumé, [after 1979]6. District Attorney organizational chart, 1990-087. Bureau of Branch & Area Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]8. Bureau of Central Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]9. Bureau of Family Support Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]10. Bureau of Investigation organizational chart, [s.d.]11. Bureau of Management & Budget organizational chart, [s.d.]12. Bureau of Special Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]13. Media Relations Division organizational chart, [s.d.]14. Public Affairs Division organizational chart, [s.d.]
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxxp
title: Gale, memo, 1991-06-25, re Valdez & Klarfeld contacts

description: Todd Gale (Kirkland & Ellis), memorandum, 1991 June 28, to File - Christopher commission, re Contacts with Ernie Valdez and Myron Klarfeld. Memoranda Interviews - Contacts with Ernie Valdez and Myron Klanfeld. PART OF A SERIES: Kirkland & Ellis provided general assistance to the Independent Commission over the course of its investigation, and also researched the merits and drawbacks associated with a community-oriented policing model. Included in the series are article clippings, reports, and other source materials related to community-oriented policing; interviews with personnel from the LAPD’s Harbor Division, where a community-oriented model was tested; and interviews with personnel from other LAPD divisions about their perceptions of departmental operations.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxxn
title: Handzlik, memo, 1991-06-25, re Interview themes

description: Kirkland & Ellis (Jan Handzlik, Todd Gale and Tony Richardson), memorandum, 1991 June 25, to File - Christopher Commission, re Summary of themes presented in interview with individuals in connection with the Christopher Commission investigation. Memoranda Interviews - Summary of themes presented in interviews with individuals in connection with the Christopher Commission investigation. PART OF A SERIES: Kirkland & Ellis provided general assistance to the Independent Commission over the course of its investigation, and also researched the merits and drawbacks associated with a community-oriented policing model. Included in the series are article clippings, reports, and other source materials related to community-oriented policing; interviews with personnel from the LAPD’s Harbor Division, where a community-oriented model was tested; and interviews with personnel from other LAPD divisions about their perceptions of departmental operations.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxwr
title: Category 2, 1975 Sept. 16 - 1991 May 24

description: Category 2, 1975 September 16 - 1991 May 24. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.1. Wayne, fax, 1991-04-25, to Marcus2. Marcus, fax, 1991-04-25, to Wayne3. Wayne, memo, 1991-04-19, to Feess4. Hevener, memo, 1991-04-16, to Feess5. Deputy D.A. interview outline, 1991-04-196. Livesay interview outline, 1991-04-047. Feess, fax, 1991-05-15, to Holliday8. Independent Commission, notes, [1991]9. Ray, memo, 1991-05-0310. Knecht interview summary, 1991-05-2411. LAPD board of rights manual, 1987-0812. Public safety officers procedural bill of rights act, chapter 9.7, 1977-01-0113. Board of Police Commissioners & City Administrative Officer, memo of understanding no. 24, 1989-03-01, to City Council14. History of the disciplinary system in the LAPD, [1991]15. Excerpt from a book on the history of the LAPD, [after 1982]16. Holcomb v. City of LA, 1989-05-0817. Skelly v. State Personnel Board, 1975-09-16
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxw3
title: Documents: LA DA's Office materials, 1987 Dec. - 1990

description: Documents: LA DA's Office materials, 1987 December - 1990. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.1. Election violations official misconduct pamphlet, 1987-122. Special Investigations Division pamphlet, 1987-123. Felony / misdemeanor complaints (1989-1990), [1991?]4. Criminal justice II work flow, [s.d.]5. Livesay, résumé, [after 1979]6. District Attorney organizational chart, 1990-087. Bureau of Branch & Area Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]8. Bureau of Central Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]9. Bureau of Family Support Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]10. Bureau of Investigation organizational chart, [s.d.]11. Bureau of Management & Budget organizational chart, [s.d.]12. Bureau of Special Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]13. Media Relations Division organizational chart, [s.d.]14. Public Affairs Division organizational chart, [s.d.]
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxwp
title: 13. Board of Police Commissioners & City Administrative Officer, memo of understanding no. 24, 1989-03-01, to City Council

description: Board of Police Commissioners & City Administrative Officer, memo of understanding no. 24, 1989 March 1, to City Council. Category 2, 1975 September 16 - 1991 May 24: Exhibit C - Memorandum of understanding no. 24 jointly submitted. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kyd6
title: [Interviews] - Smith, Ernest, 1991-05-09

description: B.J. Kelley (Morrison & Foerster), Los Angeles, California, USA, memorandum (delivered by telefacsimile), 1991 May 9, to Independent Commission, re Telephone interview: Dr Ernest Smith (2 copies). PART OF A SERIES: Morrison & Foerster assessed the manner by which LAPD officers treat racial minorities and disadvantaged sectors of the population. Included in the series are interviews held with community members regarding how police treat juveniles and the mentally ill. The series also includes statistics that evaluate the respective numbers, ranks, and geographic distribution of different races of LAPD officers.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxt8
title: Witness file - Knecht, Rita (1 of 2), 1977 Jan. 1 - 1991 May 24

description: Witness file - Knecht, Rita (1 of 2), 1977 January 1 - 1991 May 24. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.1. Knecht interview summary, 1991-05-242. LAPD board of rights manual, 1987-083. Public safety officers procedural bill of rights act, chapter 9.7, 1977-01-014. Board of Police Commissioners & City Administrative Officer, memo of understanding no. 24, 1989-03-01, to City Council5. History of the disciplinary system in the LAPD, [1991]6. Excerpt from a book on the history of the LAPD, [after 1982]7. Holcomb v. City of LA, 1989-05-088. Skelly v. State Personnel Board, 1975-09-16
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kybq
title: [Interviews] - Wright, Amos, 1991-05-10

description: Helenann Hirsch (Manatt Phelps & Phillips), memorandum, 1991 May 10, re Amos Wright: police misconduct witness. PART OF A SERIES: The staff of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips extended its support to the Independent Commission by undertaking the following tasks: preparing and reviewing the recruitment/testing and academy/training chapters of the Commission report; presenting witnesses to the Commission; interviewing over 20 LAPD personnel of different departmental ranks; interviewing city staff and medical personnel; attending meetings with the Police Protective League; reviewing the background files of LAPD officers; attending numerous roll call training sessions and public meetings; researching and drafting legal memoranda in reference to labor issues arisen within the report; conducting general background research for the Commission; and attending two ride-alongs with the LAPD.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxut
title: Correspondence, vol. 3, 1991 June 2-30

description: Correspondence, vol. 3, 1991 June 2-30. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.1. Spiegel, memo, 1991-06-302. Holliday, fax, 1991-06-29, to Feess3. Feess, fax, 1991-06-29, to Epstein4. Spiegel, fax, 1991-06-28, to Feess5. Spiegel, memo, 1991-06-28, to Drooyan6. Feess, memo, 1991-06-28, to Spiegel7. Drooyan, fax, 1991-06-28, to Feess8. Holliday, memo, 1991-06-27, to Feess9. Holliday, fax, 1991-06-27, to Feess10. Holliday, fax, 1991-06-26, to Feess11. Feess, memo, 1991-06-26, to Spiegel12. Spiegel, fax, 1991-06-25, to Feess13. Selbst, memo, 1991-06-24, to Anderson14. Currey, fax, 1991-06-21, to Ray15. Steinberg, fax, 1991-06-21, to Spiegel16. Drooyan, fax, 1991-06-20, to Feess17. Spiegel, fax, 1991-06-20, to Feess18. Anderson, letter, 1991-06-20, to Feess19. Cincone, fax, 1991-06-19, to Feess20. Drooyan, fax, 1991-06-19, to Feess21. Holliday, memo, 1991-06-18, to Anderson22. Holliday, memo, 1991-06-18, to Spiegel23. Spiegel, fax, 1991-06-17, to Feess24. Spiegel, fax, 1991-06-17, to Feess25. Ray, memo, 1991-06-13, to Christopher26. Orozco, fax, 1991-06-12, to Feess27. Currey, fax, 1991-06-12, to Spiegel28. Kelley, fax, 1991-06-10, to Feess29. Feess, fax, 1991-06-09, to Drooyan30. McClelland, fax, 1991-06-07, to Feess31. Spiegel, fax, 1991-06-06, to Feess32. Steinberg, fax, 1991-06-05, to Feess33. Spiegel, fax, 1991-06-04, to Feess34. Gotlieb, fax, 1991-06-04, to Feess35. Feess, fax, 1991-06-03, to Drooyan36. Ray, fax, 1991-06-0337. Spiegel, memo, 1991-06-0338. Feess, fax, 1991-06-03, to Spiegel
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kybg
title: Memoranda interviews - Bostic, Michael J., 1991-06-05

description: Catherine Conway (Manatt, Phelps & Phillips), memorandum, 1991 June 5, to Witness file - Michael J. Bostic, re Interview with Bostic in reference to the status of his review and any suggestions for the Independent Commission (2 copies). ❧ Michael J. Bostic scope of review outline, [s.d.] (2 copies). ❧ Recruit training program (hourly beakdown by subject), [s.d.] (2 copies). PART OF A SERIES: The staff of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips extended its support to the Independent Commission by undertaking the following tasks: preparing and reviewing the recruitment/testing and academy/training chapters of the Commission report; presenting witnesses to the Commission; interviewing over 20 LAPD personnel of different departmental ranks; interviewing city staff and medical personnel; attending meetings with the Police Protective League; reviewing the background files of LAPD officers; attending numerous roll call training sessions and public meetings; researching and drafting legal memoranda in reference to labor issues arisen within the report; conducting general background research for the Commission; and attending two ride-alongs with the LAPD.