cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399ktec
title: Proctor, Vance, 1990-1991 June

description: Proctor, Vance, 1990 May - 1991 June 19. PART OF A SERIES: The staff of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher coordinated witness interviews and conducted an extensive review of complaints filed against LAPD officers. Included in the series are summaries of witness interviews, statistics and investigative reports related to citizen complaints, an analysis on adjudicated cases involving use-of-force complaints, reports regarding LAPD's recruitment of African American officers and community oriented policing, and an excerpt from Malcolm Sparrow's Beyond 9-1-1. Also included are materials related to the firm's work product, including attorney notes, work plans, memoranda, and drafts of chapters for the Commission report.1. Chaffetz, memo, 1991-06-19, to Independent Commission on the LAPD2. Karen, fax, 1991-06-11, to Proctor3. Watch commander's (Pilor) daily report, 1990-06-014. Watch commander's (Kurtz) daily report, 1990-06-015. Sergeant's (Slinkard) daily report, 1990-06-016. Sergeant's (Ruffin) daily report, 1990-06-017. Sergeant's (Minsal) daily report, 1990-06-018. After action report: Justice for janitors, 1990-06-019. Addenda: After action: Janitors for justice demonstration, 1990-06-01 [cover page]10. Talking trash: strike supporters sweep through Century City, [1990].11. Century City telephone directory, 1990-06-0212. Local 399 - Justice for Janitors demonstration, Century City [schedule], 1990-06-0113. LAPD. Request for equipment and personnel for a special event, [1990-05]14. LAPD. Preliminary investigation of battery (Walker), 1990-06-0115. LAPD. Preliminary investigation of battery (Young), 1990-06-0116. LAPD. Preliminary investigation of battery (Rice), 1990-06-0117. LAPD. Preliminary investigation of battery (Anderson), 1990-06-0118. LAPD. Preliminary investigation of battery (Hyde), 1990-06-0119. LAPD. Preliminary investigation of battery (Pickett), 1990-06-0120. LAPD. Preliminary investigation of vandalism (IMG/Century City Realty Co.), 1990-06-0121. Justice for janitors demonstration report, 1990-06-01 [part 1 of 2]22. Justice for janitors demonstration report, 1990-06-0123. Justice for janitors demonstration report, 1990-06-01 [part 2 of 2]
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxum
title: Correspondence, vol. 2, 1991 May 2-31

description: Correspondence, vol. 2, 1991 May 2-31. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.1. McClelland, memo, 1991-05-31, to Drooyan2. Feess, fax, 1991-05-30, to Boston3. Boston, fax, 1991-05-30, to Feess4. Feess, fax, 1991-05-30, to Spiegel5. Feess, fax, 1991-05-30, to Drooyan6. Kelley, letter, 1991-05-297. La Ley presentation, 1991-05-298. Feess, fax, 1991-05-29, to Spiegel9. Spiegel, memo, 1991-05-2410. Ullman, fax, 1991-05-24, to Feess11. Feess, memo, 1991-05-24, to Drooyan12. Feess, fax, 1991-05-23, to Ullman13. Feess, fax, 1991-05-23, to Spiegel14. Drooyan, fax, 1991-05-22, to Feess15. Dasteel, fax, 1991-05-22, to Feess16. Cincone, memo, 1991-05-22, to Christopher17. Feess, fax, 1991-05-21, to Drooyan18. Spiegel, fax, 1991-05-20, to Feess19. Chaplick, fax, 1991-05-20, to Feess20. Fisher, memo, 1991-05-2021. Spiegel, fax, 1991-05-20, to Feess22. O'Melveny & Myers, fax, 1991-05-20, to Feess23. Epstein, memo, 1991-05-1324. Feess, fax, 1991-05-20, to Drooyan25. Feess, fax, 1991-05-20, to Holliday26. Spiegel, memo, 1991-05-1727. Spiegel, memo, 1991-05-1728. Chaplick, fax, 1991-05-17, to Feess29. Gotlieb, fax, 1991-05-17, to Feess30. Dasteel, fax, 1991-05-17, to Feess31. Sustained complaint summaries issues, 1991-05-1632. Reiner, letter, 1991-05-15, to Kamins33. Dasteel, memo, 1991-05-15, to Feess34. Drooyan, fax, 1991-05-14 to Feess35. Spiegel, fax, 1991-05-14, to Feess36. Feess, fax, 1991-05-14, to Romero37. Feess, fax, 1991-05-15, to Holliday38. Epstein, fax, 1991-05-13, to Feess39. Feess, fax, 1991-05-10, to Drooyan40. Feess, fax, 1991-05-10, to Holliday41. Feess, memo, 1991-05-10, to Holliday42. Feess, fax, 1991-05-10, to Spiegel43. Churchill, letter, 1991-05-08, to Feess44. Sun, memo, 1991-05-07, to Spiegel45. Spiegel, fax, 1991-05-06, to Feess46. Spiegel, letter, 1991-05-03, to Albaugh47. Spiegel, fax, 1991-05-03, to Feess48. McClelland, letter, 1991-05-02, to Marr
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxt3
title: Correspondence, vol. 2, 1991 May 2-31

description: Correspondence, vol. 2, 1991 May 2-31. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.1. McClelland, memo, 1991-05-31, to Drooyan2. Feess, fax, 1991-05-30, to Boston3. Boston, fax, 1991-05-30, to Feess4. Feess, fax, 1991-05-30, to Spiegel5. Feess, fax, 1991-05-30, to Drooyan6. Kelley, letter, 1991-05-297. La Ley presentation, 1991-05-298. Feess, fax, 1991-05-29, to Spiegel9. Spiegel, memo, 1991-05-2410. Ullman, fax, 1991-05-24, to Feess11. Feess, memo, 1991-05-24, to Drooyan12. Feess, fax, 1991-05-23, to Ullman13. Feess, fax, 1991-05-23, to Spiegel14. Drooyan, fax, 1991-05-22, to Feess15. Dasteel, fax, 1991-05-22, to Feess16. Cincone, memo, 1991-05-22, to Christopher17. Feess, fax, 1991-05-21, to Drooyan18. Spiegel, fax, 1991-05-20, to Feess19. Chaplick, fax, 1991-05-20, to Feess20. Fisher, memo, 1991-05-2021. Spiegel, fax, 1991-05-20, to Feess22. O'Melveny & Myers, fax, 1991-05-20, to Feess23. Epstein, memo, 1991-05-1324. Feess, fax, 1991-05-20, to Drooyan25. Feess, fax, 1991-05-20, to Holliday26. Spiegel, memo, 1991-05-1727. Spiegel, memo, 1991-05-1728. Chaplick, fax, 1991-05-17, to Feess29. Gotlieb, fax, 1991-05-17, to Feess30. Dasteel, fax, 1991-05-17, to Feess31. Sustained complaint summaries issues, 1991-05-1632. Reiner, letter, 1991-05-15, to Kamins33. Dasteel, memo, 1991-05-15, to Feess34. Drooyan, fax, 1991-05-14 to Feess35. Spiegel, fax, 1991-05-14, to Feess36. Feess, fax, 1991-05-14, to Romero37. Feess, fax, 1991-05-15, to Holliday38. Epstein, fax, 1991-05-13, to Feess39. Feess, fax, 1991-05-10, to Drooyan40. Feess, fax, 1991-05-10, to Holliday41. Feess, memo, 1991-05-10, to Holliday42. Feess, fax, 1991-05-10, to Spiegel43. Churchill, letter, 1991-05-08, to Feess44. Sun, memo, 1991-05-07, to Spiegel45. Spiegel, fax, 1991-05-06, to Feess46. Spiegel, letter, 1991-05-03, to Albaugh47. Spiegel, fax, 1991-05-03, to Feess48. McClelland, letter, 1991-05-02, to Marr
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399ktg4
title: Williams, Hubert, 1987 Nov. - 1991 May (4 of 4)

description: Williams, Hubert, 1987 November 4 - 1991 May 22 (4 of 4). PART OF A SERIES: The staff of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher coordinated witness interviews and conducted an extensive review of complaints filed against LAPD officers. Included in the series are summaries of witness interviews, statistics and investigative reports related to citizen complaints, an analysis on adjudicated cases involving use-of-force complaints, reports regarding LAPD's recruitment of African American officers and community oriented policing, and an excerpt from Malcolm Sparrow's Beyond 9-1-1. Also included are materials related to the firm's work product, including attorney notes, work plans, memoranda, and drafts of chapters for the Commission report.1. Holliday, memo, 1991-04-11, to Christopher2. Hubert Williams biographical sketch, [1991]3. Police Foundation annual report, 19894. The big six: Policing America's largest cities, 19915. The big six: Policing America's largest cities, 19916. Williams, letter, 1991-04-04, to Christopher7. 4 guilty in Oakland officers' trial, 1991-04-18?8. 4 guilty in Oakland officers' trial, 1991-04-18?9. The evolving strategy of police: A minority view, 1990-01
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxuc
title: Correspondence, vol. 1 (2 of 2), 1979 - 1990 Aug.

description: Correspondence, vol. 1 (2 of 2), 1979 - 1990 August. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.1. Livesay résumé, [after 1979]2. District Attorney organizational chart, 1990-083. Bureau of Branch & Area Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]4. Bureau of Central Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]5. Bureau of Family Support Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]6. Bureau of Investigation organizational chart, [s.d.]7. Bureau of Management & Budget organizational chart, [s.d.]8. Bureau of Special Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]9. Media Relations Division organizational chart, [s.d.]10. Public Affairs Division organizational chart, [s.d.]11. Felony / misdemeanor complaints (1989-1990), [1991?]12. Criminal justice II work flow, [s.d.]13. Prosecutor responsibilities introduction, 1985-0614. Prosecutor case investigation & evaluation, 1985-0615. Prosecutor supplementary case preparation request form, 1985-0616. Prosecutor corpus delicti evidence, 1985-0617. Prosecutor identity evidence, 1985-0618. Prosecutor conviction probability, 1985-06
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxu6
title: Correspondence, vol. 1 (2 of 2), 1979 - 1990 Aug.

description: Correspondence, vol. 1 (2 of 2), 1979 - 1990 August. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.1. Livesay résumé, [after 1979]2. District Attorney organizational chart, 1990-083. Bureau of Branch & Area Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]4. Bureau of Central Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]5. Bureau of Family Support Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]6. Bureau of Investigation organizational chart, [s.d.]7. Bureau of Management & Budget organizational chart, [s.d.]8. Bureau of Special Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]9. Media Relations Division organizational chart, [s.d.]10. Public Affairs Division organizational chart, [s.d.]11. Felony / misdemeanor complaints (1989-1990), [1991?]12. Criminal justice II work flow, [s.d.]13. Prosecutor responsibilities introduction, 1985-0614. Prosecutor case investigation & evaluation, 1985-0615. Prosecutor supplementary case preparation request form, 1985-0616. Prosecutor corpus delicti evidence, 1985-0617. Prosecutor identity evidence, 1985-0618. Prosecutor conviction probability, 1985-06
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399ktg3
title: Williams, Hubert, 1987 Nov. - 1991 May (2 of 4)

description: Williams, Hubert, 1987 November 4 - 1991 May 22 (2 of 4). Lee P. Brown, William Geller and James D. Ginger. "A review of administrative processes of the Tampa Police Department". Washington, DC: Police Foundation, 1987 November 18. PART OF A SERIES: The staff of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher coordinated witness interviews and conducted an extensive review of complaints filed against LAPD officers. Included in the series are summaries of witness interviews, statistics and investigative reports related to citizen complaints, an analysis on adjudicated cases involving use-of-force complaints, reports regarding LAPD's recruitment of African American officers and community oriented policing, and an excerpt from Malcolm Sparrow's Beyond 9-1-1. Also included are materials related to the firm's work product, including attorney notes, work plans, memoranda, and drafts of chapters for the Commission report.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxu3
title: Correspondence, vol. 1 (2 of 2), 1979 - 1990 Aug.

description: Correspondence, vol. 1 (2 of 2), 1979 - 1990 August. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.1. Livesay résumé, [after 1979]2. District Attorney organizational chart, 1990-083. Bureau of Branch & Area Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]4. Bureau of Central Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]5. Bureau of Family Support Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]6. Bureau of Investigation organizational chart, [s.d.]7. Bureau of Management & Budget organizational chart, [s.d.]8. Bureau of Special Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]9. Media Relations Division organizational chart, [s.d.]10. Public Affairs Division organizational chart, [s.d.]11. Felony / misdemeanor complaints (1989-1990), [1991?]12. Criminal justice II work flow, [s.d.]13. Prosecutor responsibilities introduction, 1985-0614. Prosecutor case investigation & evaluation, 1985-0615. Prosecutor supplementary case preparation request form, 1985-0616. Prosecutor corpus delicti evidence, 1985-0617. Prosecutor identity evidence, 1985-0618. Prosecutor conviction probability, 1985-06
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kpve
title: Analyses requested by counsel (1 of 3), 1991 May-June

description: Analyses requested by counsel (1 of 3), 1991 May 15 - June 24. PART OF A SERIES: To ascertain misconduct on the part of LAPD officers, the Independent Commission set out to probe databases maintained by the LAPD related to four areas: personnel complaints, use of force, officer-involved shootings (OIS), and the use of dogs (K-9). This task was delegated to the firm Freeman & Mills, which was responsible for obtaining these databases from the LAPD, converting pertinent data into useable formats, creating additional databases of additional information, and analyzing its findings. The series contains items related to Freeman & Mills' work product, including numerous analyses of use-of-force, OIS, and K-9 data; weekly complaint summary printouts; graphs, charts, tables, and other visual representations of this data; and computer directory lists that provide the names and locations of files within the LAPD's databases. At the end of the series is a draft copy of the Independent Commission's final report, which incorporates many of the aforementioned data and figures.1. Commission requests counsel [cover sheet]2. Analyses requested by counsel3. Use of force reported reports by frequency, 1991-05-284. Use of force reports by officer, 1991-05-17 & 1991-06-035. Use of force reports per division, 1997-05-15, 1991-05-17, 1991-06-066. Sustained allegations by penalty type, 1991-06-247. Number of OIS, UOR, K9 reports and complaints of selected officers, 1991-06-158. K9 bite and database analysis, 1991-06-18 & 1991-06-199. Use of force reports per officer, 1991-06-24; Officers listed in the K9 database, 1991-06-1910. K9 and burglary / robbery analysis, 1991-06-1811. Crimes reported on K9 database, 1991-06-1812. Information on listed officer serial numbers for all reports, 1991-06-0613. Officer serial numbers, 1991-06-1714. Type of allegation (by sex and year), 1991-0615. Top 63 officers franked by number of use of force reports filed, 1991-06-05 & 1991-06-06; Type of allegation (by division and year), 1991-06-14.16. Ranking of women officers by number of use of force reports filed, 199117. Female officer suspected complaints, 1991-06-13
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kptt
title: Faxes, 1991-03-19 thru 1991-07-02

description: Faxes, 1991 March 19 -July 2. PART OF A SERIES: On April 3, 1991, the Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners ordered Chief of Police Daryl Gates to take 60 days of paid administrative leave in response to the Rodney King incident. After threatening legal action, Gates was reinstated to his post as Chief by the City Council. However, this incident called into question the balance of power between the Chief of Police and members of the Commission. First Interstate Bancorp was the firm selected to investigate the dynamics between these two administrative bodies, and materials in the series pertain to the firm's work product.1. Cardenas, fax, 1991-07-02, to Gotlieb2. Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department [report], 1991-07-013. Price, fax, 1991-06-03, to Christopher4. Sheinbaum, letter, 1991-05-31, to Price5. Swartz, fax, 1991-07-03, to Gotlieb6. Source materials, 1933, 1963, 1967, 1971-1991; Interviews, 19918. Torres, fax, 1991-06-11, to Gotlieb9. Torres, memo, 1991-06-11, to Hungar10. Charter amendment proposals, 1971, 1972, 1974, 1976, 1977, 1980, 1983, 1984, 199111. Independent Commission report table of contents, 1991-05-1712. Independent Commission report table of contents, 1991-05-2413. Christopher Commission caveats, [s.d.]14. Palmer, fax, 1991-05-30, to Gotlieb15. Palmer, memo, 1991-05-30, to "distribution"16. Driscoll, fax, 1991-07-01, to Gotlieb17. Driscoll, memo, 1991-03-19, to Holden18. Little, fax, 1991-06-24, to Gotlieb19. Little, memo, 1991-06-24, to Currey20. The Commission recommends that a new commission be established with a five year mandate subject to renewal
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kptq
title: Faxes, 1991-03-19 thru 1991-07-02

description: Faxes, 1991 March 19 -July 2. PART OF A SERIES: On April 3, 1991, the Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners ordered Chief of Police Daryl Gates to take 60 days of paid administrative leave in response to the Rodney King incident. After threatening legal action, Gates was reinstated to his post as Chief by the City Council. However, this incident called into question the balance of power between the Chief of Police and members of the Commission. First Interstate Bancorp was the firm selected to investigate the dynamics between these two administrative bodies, and materials in the series pertain to the firm's work product.1. Cardenas, fax, 1991-07-02, to Gotlieb2. Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department [report], 1991-07-013. Price, fax, 1991-06-03, to Christopher4. Sheinbaum, letter, 1991-05-31, to Price5. Swartz, fax, 1991-07-03, to Gotlieb6. Source materials, 1933, 1963, 1967, 1971-1991; Interviews, 19918. Torres, fax, 1991-06-11, to Gotlieb9. Torres, memo, 1991-06-11, to Hungar10. Charter amendment proposals, 1971, 1972, 1974, 1976, 1977, 1980, 1983, 1984, 199111. Independent Commission report table of contents, 1991-05-1712. Independent Commission report table of contents, 1991-05-2413. Christopher Commission caveats, [s.d.]14. Palmer, fax, 1991-05-30, to Gotlieb15. Palmer, memo, 1991-05-30, to "distribution"16. Driscoll, fax, 1991-07-01, to Gotlieb17. Driscoll, memo, 1991-03-19, to Holden18. Little, fax, 1991-06-24, to Gotlieb19. Little, memo, 1991-06-24, to Currey20. The Commission recommends that a new commission be established with a five year mandate subject to renewal
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kql7
title: Weekly complaint summary printouts (4 of 4), 1991 May

description: Weekly complaint summary printouts (4 of 4), 1991 May 30. PART OF A SERIES: To ascertain misconduct on the part of LAPD officers, the Independent Commission set out to probe databases maintained by the LAPD related to four areas: personnel complaints, use of force, officer-involved shootings (OIS), and the use of dogs (K-9). This task was delegated to the firm Freeman & Mills, which was responsible for obtaining these databases from the LAPD, converting pertinent data into useable formats, creating additional databases of additional information, and analyzing its findings. The series contains items related to Freeman & Mills' work product, including numerous analyses of use-of-force, OIS, and K-9 data; weekly complaint summary printouts; graphs, charts, tables, and other visual representations of this data; and computer directory lists that provide the names and locations of files within the LAPD's databases. At the end of the series is a draft copy of the Independent Commission's final report, which incorporates many of the aforementioned data and figures.1. GWY 5/30/[1991] edited [cover sheet]2. Weekly complaint summary, 1991-05-303. JDR 5/30/[1991] edited [cover sheet]4. Weekly complaint summary, 1991-05-305. TAB 5/30/[1991] edited [cover sheet]6. Weekly complaint summary, 1991-05-30
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kql4
title: Weekly complaint summary printouts (3 of 4), 1991 May

description: Weekly complaint summary printouts (3 of 4), 1991 May 28-30. PART OF A SERIES: To ascertain misconduct on the part of LAPD officers, the Independent Commission set out to probe databases maintained by the LAPD related to four areas: personnel complaints, use of force, officer-involved shootings (OIS), and the use of dogs (K-9). This task was delegated to the firm Freeman & Mills, which was responsible for obtaining these databases from the LAPD, converting pertinent data into useable formats, creating additional databases of additional information, and analyzing its findings. The series contains items related to Freeman & Mills' work product, including numerous analyses of use-of-force, OIS, and K-9 data; weekly complaint summary printouts; graphs, charts, tables, and other visual representations of this data; and computer directory lists that provide the names and locations of files within the LAPD's databases. At the end of the series is a draft copy of the Independent Commission's final report, which incorporates many of the aforementioned data and figures.1. GWY 5/28/[1991] edited [cover sheet]2. Weekly complaint summary, 1991-05-283. GWY 5/30/[1991] edited [cover sheet]4. Weekly complaint summary, 1991-05-305. RLE 5/29/[1991] edited [cover sheet]6. Weekly complaint summary, 1991-05-29