DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3540502
title: Spatial partial identity model for spatial capture-recapture analysis of large carnivores in Kasungu National Park, Malawi

description: Overview: Decline in global carnivore populations has led to increased demand for assessment of carnivore densities in understudied habitats. Spatial capture-recapture is used increasingly to estimate species densities, where individuals are often identified from their unique pelage patterns. However, uncertainty in bilateral individual identification can lead to the omission of capture data and reduce the precision of results. The recent development of the two-flank spatial partial identity model (SPIM), offers a cost-effective approach which can reduce uncertainty in individual identity assignment and provide robust density estimates. We conducted camera trap surveys annually between 2016 and 2018 in Kasungu National Park, Malawi, a primary miombo woodland and a habitat lacking baseline data on carnivore densities. We used SPIM to estimate density for leopard (<em>Panthera pardus</em>) and spotted hyaena (<em>Crocuta crocuta</em>), and report on the status of other large carnivores. Usage notes: These data are to estimate density for leopard and spotted hyaena in KNP, Malawi. They are provided as an example for using the spatial partial identity model for spatial capture-recapture analysis in populations where individuals are partially identified. Methods: Individual leopards and spotted hyaena were identified from photographs using their unique pelage patterns (Henschel & Ray, 2003). A database was maintained of identified individuals, with partial (single flank) or complete (two flank) identities, to build capture histories for SCR analysis. We identified individuals from left flank captures for both species, due to higher numbers of identified left flank individuals recorded during preliminary surveys. Complete identities were added where flanks were certain to come from the same individual (from baited stations outside of survey time, live captures, dual camera trap stations and multiple passes of a single camera trap). Leopards were sexed by visual determination of external genitalia, presence of the dewlap, frontal bossing and overall body size (Henschel & Ray, 2003; Devens <em>et al</em>. 2018). Sexing was not possible for spotted hyaena due to difficulties in determining sex from external genitalia and body size. Capture histories were developed for spatial captures and trap effort, with each day (24 hours) treated as a separate sampling occasion (Goldberg <em>et al</em>. 2015). Trap effort was measured through a binary matrix of active-inactive days, to improve estimates of detection probability, and included the spatial location of each camera location. Density was modelled using the package <em>SPIM </em>(Augustine, 2018) in R v.3.5.2<em> </em>(R Development Core Team, 2018) to resolve the complete identity of individuals from single-flank samples probabilistically (see Augustine <em>et al</em>. 2018 for complete description of spatial partial identity model), and a Bernoulli observation model fitted, whereby an individual may be captured in each trap only once during each sampling occasion (Royle <em>et al</em>. 2013; Augustine <em>et al</em>. 2018). For Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulations, a single chain of 50,000 iterations per single session analysis was undertaken, with a burn-in of 500 iterations and data augmentation of 100-130 individuals for leopard and 125-250 for spotted hyaena. Analysis was conducted with an increasing buffer width from 10,000 to 25,000 metres (leopard) and 10,000 to 40,000 metres (spotted hyaena), using 5,000 metre increments, until density estimates stabilised (Chase-Grey <em>et al</em>. 2013; Devens <em>et al</em>. 2018).