cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135003
title: Table 4 in New nematode species and genera (Nematoda: Chromadorea) from cold seeps on Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand

description: Table 4. Morphometrics (µm) of Aulostomonema abyssum gen. et sp. nov. Abbeviations: a = body length/maximum body diameter; b = body length/pharynx length; c = body length/tail length; cʹ = tail length/anal or cloacal body diameter; cbd = corresponding body diameter; L = total body length; V = vulva distance from anterior end of body; %V = V/total body length × 100.
MalesJuvenilesHolotypeParatypeParatypesSpecimenM1M2J1J2L8790714655063770a65524742b49463726c39682217cʹ2.71.34.54.8Body diam. at cephalic setae23211613Body diam. at amphids51474031Length of cephalic sensilla3332Amphideal fovea height15141213Amphideal fovea width18161514Amphideal fovea width/cbd (%)35343845Amphideal fovea from anterior end24262322Nerve ring from anterior end12510710195Nerve ring cbd102928459Excretory pore from anterior159109123122Pharynx length181156150143Pharyngeal bulb diam.65605241Pharynx cbd at base1171099970Max. body diam.13513811789Spicule length124123––Gubernacular apophyses length2120––Cloacal/anal body diam.84835747Tail length227105256224
description: Published as part of Leduc, Daniel, 2023, New nematode species and genera (Nematoda: Chromadorea) from cold seeps on Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand, pp. 21 in European Journal of Taxonomy 856 on page 21, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.856.2025, http://zenodo.org/record/7522913
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135004
title: Table 5 in New nematode species and genera (Nematoda: Chromadorea) from cold seeps on Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand

description: Table 5. Morphometrics (µm) of Deraionema barbatum gen. et sp. nov. Abbreviations: a = body length/ maximum body diameter; b = body length/pharynx length; c = body length/tail length; cʹ = tail length/ anal or cloacal body diameter; cbd = corresponding body diameter; L = total body length; V = vulva distance from anterior end of body; %V = V/total body length × 100.
MalesFemalesHolotypeParatypesParatypesSpecimenM1M2M3M4F1F2F3F4L26192577242023882279208523363217a2023212328212125b155546565c1413131211101213cʹ4.04.43.33.64.84.63.63.8Body diam. at cephalic setae3032293328293037Body diam. at amphids4951534946444360Length of cephalic sensilla4453–46555Amphideal fovea height55541213147Amphideal aperture height21111213147Amphideal fovea width4951534918201622Amphideal fovea width/cbd (%)10010010010039453737Amphideal fovea from anterior end3742463932292939Nerve ring from anterior end174177180178166146167205Nerve ring cbd83888481656368100Excretory pore from anterior255254266ND240164ND297Pharynx length537513532548398385380628Pharyngeal diam. at base6159695339465063Pharynx cbd at base999710286727987114Max. body diam.1281131171068199113127Spicule length158178168147––––Gubernacular apophyses length45474854––––Cloacal/anal body diam.4946565845465563Tail length194201183206216213196241V––––1403127814252184%V––––62616168Vulval body diam.––––7895103112
description: Published as part of Leduc, Daniel, 2023, New nematode species and genera (Nematoda: Chromadorea) from cold seeps on Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand, pp. 27 in European Journal of Taxonomy 856 on page 27, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.856.2025, http://zenodo.org/record/7522913
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135005
title: Table 5 in New nematode species and genera (Nematoda: Chromadorea) from cold seeps on Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand

description: Table 5. Morphometrics (µm) of Deraionema barbatum gen. et sp. nov. Abbreviations: a = body length/ maximum body diameter; b = body length/pharynx length; c = body length/tail length; cʹ = tail length/ anal or cloacal body diameter; cbd = corresponding body diameter; L = total body length; V = vulva distance from anterior end of body; %V = V/total body length × 100.
MalesFemalesHolotypeParatypesParatypesSpecimenM1M2M3M4F1F2F3F4L26192577242023882279208523363217a2023212328212125b155546565c1413131211101213cʹ4.04.43.33.64.84.63.63.8Body diam. at cephalic setae3032293328293037Body diam. at amphids4951534946444360Length of cephalic sensilla4453–46555Amphideal fovea height55541213147Amphideal aperture height21111213147Amphideal fovea width4951534918201622Amphideal fovea width/cbd (%)10010010010039453737Amphideal fovea from anterior end3742463932292939Nerve ring from anterior end174177180178166146167205Nerve ring cbd83888481656368100Excretory pore from anterior255254266ND240164ND297Pharynx length537513532548398385380628Pharyngeal diam. at base6159695339465063Pharynx cbd at base999710286727987114Max. body diam.1281131171068199113127Spicule length158178168147––––Gubernacular apophyses length45474854––––Cloacal/anal body diam.4946565845465563Tail length194201183206216213196241V––––1403127814252184%V––––62616168Vulval body diam.––––7895103112
description: Published as part of Leduc, Daniel, 2023, New nematode species and genera (Nematoda: Chromadorea) from cold seeps on Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand, pp. 27 in European Journal of Taxonomy 856 on page 27, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.856.2025, http://zenodo.org/record/7522913
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135006
title: Table 6 in New nematode species and genera (Nematoda: Chromadorea) from cold seeps on Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand

description: Table 6. Morphometrics (µm) of Aegialoaliamus magnus sp. nov. Abbreviations: a = body length/ maximum body diameter; b = body length/pharynx length; c = body length/tail length; cʹ = tail length/ anal or cloacal body diameter; cbd = corresponding body diameter; L = total body length; V = vulva distance from anterior end of body; %V = V/total body length × 100.
MalesFemalesHolotypeParatypeParatypesSpecimenM1M2F1F2L3261292530682846a43423942b14141413c16171816cʹ3.32.83.13.5Body diam. at cephalic setae16191615Body diam. at amphids27262926Length of cephalic sensilla1111Amphideal fovea height16151615Amphideal fovea width14161415Amphideal fovea width/cbd (%)52624858Amphideal fovea from anterior end19171717Nerve ring from anterior end160124127126Nerve ring cbd59615655Pharynx length238211214214Pharyngeal bulb diam.43414237Pharyngeal bulb length53555355Pharynx cbd at base65666362Max. body diam.76707867Spicule length9386––Gubernacular apophyses length2526––Cloacal/anal body diam.60605651Tail length199169172178V––15311428%V––5050Vulval body diam.––7867
description: Published as part of Leduc, Daniel, 2023, New nematode species and genera (Nematoda: Chromadorea) from cold seeps on Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand, pp. 33 in European Journal of Taxonomy 856 on page 33, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.856.2025, http://zenodo.org/record/7522913
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135007
title: Table 6 in New nematode species and genera (Nematoda: Chromadorea) from cold seeps on Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand

description: Table 6. Morphometrics (µm) of Aegialoaliamus magnus sp. nov. Abbreviations: a = body length/ maximum body diameter; b = body length/pharynx length; c = body length/tail length; cʹ = tail length/ anal or cloacal body diameter; cbd = corresponding body diameter; L = total body length; V = vulva distance from anterior end of body; %V = V/total body length × 100.
MalesFemalesHolotypeParatypeParatypesSpecimenM1M2F1F2L3261292530682846a43423942b14141413c16171816cʹ3.32.83.13.5Body diam. at cephalic setae16191615Body diam. at amphids27262926Length of cephalic sensilla1111Amphideal fovea height16151615Amphideal fovea width14161415Amphideal fovea width/cbd (%)52624858Amphideal fovea from anterior end19171717Nerve ring from anterior end160124127126Nerve ring cbd59615655Pharynx length238211214214Pharyngeal bulb diam.43414237Pharyngeal bulb length53555355Pharynx cbd at base65666362Max. body diam.76707867Spicule length9386––Gubernacular apophyses length2526––Cloacal/anal body diam.60605651Tail length199169172178V––15311428%V––5050Vulval body diam.––7867
description: Published as part of Leduc, Daniel, 2023, New nematode species and genera (Nematoda: Chromadorea) from cold seeps on Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand, pp. 33 in European Journal of Taxonomy 856 on page 33, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.856.2025, http://zenodo.org/record/7522913
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135008
title: Table 7 in New nematode species and genera (Nematoda: Chromadorea) from cold seeps on Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand

description: Table 7. Morphometrics (µm) of Desmodora parapilosa sp. nov. Abbreviations: a = body length/ maximum body diameter; b = body length/pharynx length; c = body length/tail length; cʹ = tail length/ anal or cloacal body diameter; cbd = corresponding body diameter; L = total body length; V = vulva distance from anterior end of body; %V = V/total body length × 100.
MalesFemalesHolotypeParatypesParatypesSpecimenM1M2M3M4F1F2L250322652492264126493252a373539383437b121211121013c202019191923cʹ2.62.73.03.13.33.5Body diam. at cephalic setae272625222222Body diam. at amphids434339433938Length of cephalic sensilla3–43–454–544Amphideal fovea height292728301615Amphideal fovea width272224231414Amphideal fovea width/cbd (%)635162533637Amphideal fovea from anterior end1012410811Nerve ring from anterior end112101118129146133Nerve ring cbd616260656764Pharynx length215196234227254258Pharyngeal bulb diam.444445464948Pharynx cbd at base646464696869Max. body diam.686464697889Spicule length63666361––Gubernacular apophyses length32363433––Cloacal/anal body diam.484345464240Tail length127114133142138141V––––%V––––Vulval body diam.––––
description: Published as part of Leduc, Daniel, 2023, New nematode species and genera (Nematoda: Chromadorea) from cold seeps on Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand, pp. 39 in European Journal of Taxonomy 856 on page 39, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.856.2025, http://zenodo.org/record/7522913
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135009
title: Table 7 in New nematode species and genera (Nematoda: Chromadorea) from cold seeps on Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand

description: Table 7. Morphometrics (µm) of Desmodora parapilosa sp. nov. Abbreviations: a = body length/ maximum body diameter; b = body length/pharynx length; c = body length/tail length; cʹ = tail length/ anal or cloacal body diameter; cbd = corresponding body diameter; L = total body length; V = vulva distance from anterior end of body; %V = V/total body length × 100.
MalesFemalesHolotypeParatypesParatypesSpecimenM1M2M3M4F1F2L250322652492264126493252a373539383437b121211121013c202019191923cʹ2.62.73.03.13.33.5Body diam. at cephalic setae272625222222Body diam. at amphids434339433938Length of cephalic sensilla3–43–454–544Amphideal fovea height292728301615Amphideal fovea width272224231414Amphideal fovea width/cbd (%)635162533637Amphideal fovea from anterior end1012410811Nerve ring from anterior end112101118129146133Nerve ring cbd616260656764Pharynx length215196234227254258Pharyngeal bulb diam.444445464948Pharynx cbd at base646464696869Max. body diam.686464697889Spicule length63666361––Gubernacular apophyses length32363433––Cloacal/anal body diam.484345464240Tail length127114133142138141V––––%V––––Vulval body diam.––––
description: Published as part of Leduc, Daniel, 2023, New nematode species and genera (Nematoda: Chromadorea) from cold seeps on Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand, pp. 39 in European Journal of Taxonomy 856 on page 39, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.856.2025, http://zenodo.org/record/7522913
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135010
title: Table 8 in New nematode species and genera (Nematoda: Chromadorea) from cold seeps on Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand

description: Table 8. Comparison of morphometric data of Desmodora parapilosa sp. nov. and Desmodora pilosa Ditlevsen, 1926 from the literature (modified from Leduc 2021). Abbreviations: ND = no data; * = estimated from figure; ** = morphometric data of females not provided; *** = Desmodora gorbunovi Filipjev, 1946 and D. gorbunovi perforata Filipjev, 1946 were synonymised with D. pilosa by Gerlach (1963); # = Pores present in D. gorbunovi perforata but absent in D. gorbunovi.
DesmodoraDesmodora aff.Desmodora pilosaDesmodoraparapilosa sp. nov.pilosagorbunovi and D. gorbunovi perforata ***ReferencePresent studyLeduc (2021)Ditlevsen (1926)Jensen (1991) **Filipjev (1946)LocationSW PacificSW PacificNW AtlanticNorwegian SeaArctic OceanWater depth (m)1226–123760801048–1096970–3062410–510SexMalesFemalesMaleFemaleFemaleFemalesMalesFemalesL2265– 26412649– 32522562277630002820, 31802950– 36003300– 3400a35–3934–3743493030, 3445–5035–40b11–1210–13911138, 1010–1110–13c19–2019–2322211816, 1918–2219–21cʹ2.6–3.13.3–3.52.33.23.5*2.5, 2.7*3.0*3.2*Length of inner labial setae2–4344–5ND65*NDLength of outer labial setae4–64–533ND96*NDLength of cephalic setae3–5454ND95*NDCephalic sensilla jointed?YYNNNNNNAmphid height27–3015–162416ND2117*NDAmphid width22–27141913ND2017*NDAmphid width/cbd (%)51–6336–37493137*2337*NDAmphid turns2.251.75–2.01.51.251.251.251.251.25Buccal cavity armatureDorsal + smaller ventrosublateral teeth and two lateral transverse rows of denticlesDorsal + smaller ventrosublateral teeth and two lateral transverse rows of denticlesNDDorsal + smaller ventrosublateral teeth and band of denticles along ventral sectorSmall dorsal tooth (ventrosublateral teeth may be present)Spicule length61–66–75–ND85, 9672–80–Gubernaculum length32–36–30–ND36, 4540–%V–63–64–5456ND–62–65Cephalic capsule with vacuoles?YesYesYesYesNoYesVariable#Variable#
description: Published as part of Leduc, Daniel, 2023, New nematode species and genera (Nematoda: Chromadorea) from cold seeps on Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand, pp. 40 in European Journal of Taxonomy 856 on page 40, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.856.2025, http://zenodo.org/record/7522913
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135011
title: Table 8 in New nematode species and genera (Nematoda: Chromadorea) from cold seeps on Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand

description: Table 8. Comparison of morphometric data of Desmodora parapilosa sp. nov. and Desmodora pilosa Ditlevsen, 1926 from the literature (modified from Leduc 2021). Abbreviations: ND = no data; * = estimated from figure; ** = morphometric data of females not provided; *** = Desmodora gorbunovi Filipjev, 1946 and D. gorbunovi perforata Filipjev, 1946 were synonymised with D. pilosa by Gerlach (1963); # = Pores present in D. gorbunovi perforata but absent in D. gorbunovi.
DesmodoraDesmodora aff.Desmodora pilosaDesmodoraparapilosa sp. nov.pilosagorbunovi and D. gorbunovi perforata ***ReferencePresent studyLeduc (2021)Ditlevsen (1926)Jensen (1991) **Filipjev (1946)LocationSW PacificSW PacificNW AtlanticNorwegian SeaArctic OceanWater depth (m)1226–123760801048–1096970–3062410–510SexMalesFemalesMaleFemaleFemaleFemalesMalesFemalesL2265– 26412649– 32522562277630002820, 31802950– 36003300– 3400a35–3934–3743493030, 3445–5035–40b11–1210–13911138, 1010–1110–13c19–2019–2322211816, 1918–2219–21cʹ2.6–3.13.3–3.52.33.23.5*2.5, 2.7*3.0*3.2*Length of inner labial setae2–4344–5ND65*NDLength of outer labial setae4–64–533ND96*NDLength of cephalic setae3–5454ND95*NDCephalic sensilla jointed?YYNNNNNNAmphid height27–3015–162416ND2117*NDAmphid width22–27141913ND2017*NDAmphid width/cbd (%)51–6336–37493137*2337*NDAmphid turns2.251.75–2.01.51.251.251.251.251.25Buccal cavity armatureDorsal + smaller ventrosublateral teeth and two lateral transverse rows of denticlesDorsal + smaller ventrosublateral teeth and two lateral transverse rows of denticlesNDDorsal + smaller ventrosublateral teeth and band of denticles along ventral sectorSmall dorsal tooth (ventrosublateral teeth may be present)Spicule length61–66–75–ND85, 9672–80–Gubernaculum length32–36–30–ND36, 4540–%V–63–64–5456ND–62–65Cephalic capsule with vacuoles?YesYesYesYesNoYesVariable#Variable#
description: Published as part of Leduc, Daniel, 2023, New nematode species and genera (Nematoda: Chromadorea) from cold seeps on Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand, pp. 40 in European Journal of Taxonomy 856 on page 40, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.856.2025, http://zenodo.org/record/7522913
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135014
title: Table 1 in Contribution to the study of marine harpacticoid fauna (Crustacea, Copepoda) of Iceland

description: Table 1. Localities and coordinates of the sampling stations.
SpeciesDateCoordinateLongipedia coronate25.08.195563°30’12’’N 17°42’07’’WAmphiascus minutus03.07.200464°04’58’’N 22°41’37’’WAmphiascus giesbrechti08.07.200464°9’N 21°55’WAmphiascus subdebilis30.06.200464°04’58’’N 22°41’37’’WLaophonte setosa01.07.200464°02’31’’N 22°42’52’’WHeterolaophonte stroemii stroemii08/07/200464°03’28’’N22°42’16’’WHeterolaophonte minuta03.07.200464°04’58’’N 22°41’37’’WHeterolaophonte littoralis littoralis03.07.200464°04’58’’N 22°42’37’’WPlatychelipus littoralis03.07.200464°04’58’’N 22°41’37’’WParathalestris clausii03.07.200464°04’58’’N 22°41’37’’WTisbe minor03.07.200464°04’58’’N 22°41’37’’WAmeira minuta30.06.200464°04’58’’N 22°41’37’’WProameira hiddensöensis30.06.200464°04’58’’N 22°41’37’’WNitokra spinipes29.07.2004 01.07.2004 08.07.2004 08.07.200464°02’41’’N 22°42’43’’W 64°03’30’’N 22°42’30’’W 64°03’27’’N 22°42’35’’W 64°74’N 22°0’WMesochra lilljeborgi08.07.200464° 9’ N 21°55’ WMesochra rapiens01.07.200464°03’30’’N 22°42’30’’WLeimia vaga08.07.200464° 9’ N 21°55’ WMicroarthridion littorale29.07.200764°02’41’’N 22°42’43’’WAlteutha oblonga15.09.200163°43’70’’N 16°12’10’’W
description: Published as part of Apostolov, Apostol, 2014, Contribution to the study of marine harpacticoid fauna (Crustacea, Copepoda) of Iceland, pp. 4 in ZooNotes 62 (62) on page 4, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8298375
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135015
title: Table 1 in Contribution to the study of marine harpacticoid fauna (Crustacea, Copepoda) of Iceland

description: Table 1. Localities and coordinates of the sampling stations.
SpeciesDateCoordinateLongipedia coronate25.08.195563°30’12’’N 17°42’07’’WAmphiascus minutus03.07.200464°04’58’’N 22°41’37’’WAmphiascus giesbrechti08.07.200464°9’N 21°55’WAmphiascus subdebilis30.06.200464°04’58’’N 22°41’37’’WLaophonte setosa01.07.200464°02’31’’N 22°42’52’’WHeterolaophonte stroemii stroemii08/07/200464°03’28’’N22°42’16’’WHeterolaophonte minuta03.07.200464°04’58’’N 22°41’37’’WHeterolaophonte littoralis littoralis03.07.200464°04’58’’N 22°42’37’’WPlatychelipus littoralis03.07.200464°04’58’’N 22°41’37’’WParathalestris clausii03.07.200464°04’58’’N 22°41’37’’WTisbe minor03.07.200464°04’58’’N 22°41’37’’WAmeira minuta30.06.200464°04’58’’N 22°41’37’’WProameira hiddensöensis30.06.200464°04’58’’N 22°41’37’’WNitokra spinipes29.07.2004 01.07.2004 08.07.2004 08.07.200464°02’41’’N 22°42’43’’W 64°03’30’’N 22°42’30’’W 64°03’27’’N 22°42’35’’W 64°74’N 22°0’WMesochra lilljeborgi08.07.200464° 9’ N 21°55’ WMesochra rapiens01.07.200464°03’30’’N 22°42’30’’WLeimia vaga08.07.200464° 9’ N 21°55’ WMicroarthridion littorale29.07.200764°02’41’’N 22°42’43’’WAlteutha oblonga15.09.200163°43’70’’N 16°12’10’’W
description: Published as part of Apostolov, Apostol, 2014, Contribution to the study of marine harpacticoid fauna (Crustacea, Copepoda) of Iceland, pp. 4 in ZooNotes 62 (62) on page 4, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8298375
DOI: 10.15468/dl.9jcpp2
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 585 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "Geometry POLYGON((-122.18062 35.50232,-120.44398 35.50232,-120.44398 36.81968,-122.18062 36.81968,-122.18062 35.50232))",
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 "TaxonKey is Phrynosoma blainvillii Gray, 1839"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 585 records from 6 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0005655-250402121839773/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.2ttusa
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 210 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "TaxonKey is Polycnemum majus",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "BasisOfRecord is one of (Specimen)"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 210 records from 13 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0010104-260129131611470/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.e3yzs5
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 33836 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "TaxonKey is one of (Trifolium medium, Trifolium medium)",
 "Year is greater than or equal to 1900",
 "Geometry POLYGON ((8.643 46.99, 14.1 46.92, 14.43 50.75, 8.534 50.83, 8.643 46.99))",
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 "BasisOfRecord is one of (Observation, Human Observation, Machine Observation, Material sample)"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 33836 records from 50 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0010102-260129131611470/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18472486
title: Relative Fluency: Can prediction–perception discrepancies prime the response required by a subsequent task?

description: Processing fluency has long been shown to influence perception, judgment, and decision making, yet its functional role in cognitive control remains poorly understood. In particular, it is unclear whether fluency effects merely reflect retrospective evaluations of processing ease or whether they play a forward-looking role in regulating attention and inference. The present study addresses this issue by examining whether discrepancies between predicted and experienced processing fluency can modulate attentional allocation and influence subsequent cognitive processing beyond the stimulus that generates the discrepancy. Across two experiments, we show that stimuli associated with low expected fluency—but processed more efficiently than anticipated—produce robust facilitation effects on subsequent target processing.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18472485
title: Relative Fluency: Can prediction–perception discrepancies prime the response required by a subsequent task?

description: Processing fluency has long been shown to influence perception, judgment, and decision making, yet its functional role in cognitive control remains poorly understood. In particular, it is unclear whether fluency effects merely reflect retrospective evaluations of processing ease or whether they play a forward-looking role in regulating attention and inference. The present study addresses this issue by examining whether discrepancies between predicted and experienced processing fluency can modulate attentional allocation and influence subsequent cognitive processing beyond the stimulus that generates the discrepancy. Across two experiments, we show that stimuli associated with low expected fluency—but processed more efficiently than anticipated—produce robust facilitation effects on subsequent target processing.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.7bz5vu
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 17157 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "TaxonKey is one of (Trifolium montanum)",
 "Year is greater than or equal to 1900",
 "Geometry POLYGON ((8.643 46.99, 14.1 46.92, 14.43 50.75, 8.534 50.83, 8.643 46.99))",
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 "BasisOfRecord is one of (Observation, Human Observation, Machine Observation, Material sample)"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 17157 records from 33 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0010105-260129131611470/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.21227/rm8m-8d50
title: "CRMHP"

description: "Part of datasets for CRMHPs"