cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/p1vece
title: Archival Data for Page Protection: Another Missing Dimension of Wikipedia Research

description: &lt;p&gt;This dataset contains data and software for the following paper:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Hill, Benjamin Mako and Shaw, Aaron. (2015) “Page Protection: Another Missing Dimension of Wikipedia Research.” In &lt;em&gt;Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (OpenSym 2015)&lt;/em&gt;. ACM Press. &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/2788993.2789846"&gt;doi: 10.1145/2788993.2789846&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is an archival version of the data and software released with the paper. All of these data were (and, at the time of writing, continue to be) hosted at: &lt;a href="https://communitydata.cc/wiki-proetection/"&gt;https://communitydata.cc/wiki-proetection/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Page protection&lt;/strong&gt; is a &lt;a href="https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Protected_pages"&gt;feature of MediaWiki software&lt;/a&gt; that allows administrators to restrict contributions to particular pages. For example, a page can be “protected” so that only administrators or logged-in editors with a history of good editing can edit, move, or create it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Protection might involve “full protection” where a page can only be edited by administrators (i.e., “sysops”) or “semi-protection” where a page can only be edited by accounts with a history of good edits (i.e., “autoconfirmed” users).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Although largely hidden, page protection profoundly shapes activity on the site. For example, page protection is an important tool used to manage access and participation in situations where vandalism or interpersonal conflict can threaten to undermine content quality. While protection affects only a small portion of pages in English Wikipedia, many of the most highly viewed pages are protected. For example, the “Main Page” in English Wikipedia has been protected since February, 2006 and all Featured Articles are protected at the time they appear on the site’s main page. Millions of viewers may never edit Wikipedia because they never see an edit button.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Despite it's widespread and influential nature, very little quantitative research on Wikipedia has taken page protection into account systematically. This page contains software and data to help Wikipedia researchers do exactly this in their work.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Because a page's protection status can change over time, the snapshots of page protection data stored by Wikimedia and &lt;a href="http://dumps.wikimedia.org/"&gt;published by Wikimedia Foundation in as dumps&lt;/a&gt; is incomplete. As a result, taking protection into account involves looking at several different sources of data.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Much more detail can be found in our paper &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/2788993.2789846"&gt;Page Protection: Another Missing Dimension of Wikipedia Research&lt;/a&gt;. If you use this software or these data, we would appreciate if you cite the paper.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/pdk4i
title: Passed Resolves; Resolves 1837, c.75, SC1/series 228, Petition of Cyrus Mann

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Arguing for the right to petition and protesting the existence of slavery in Washington D.C. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10456162"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10456162&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Westminster &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Luther Pierce, Pelham &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Cyrus Mann&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Samuel Clark&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Edward Kendall&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 51 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 51 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Reverend Cyrus Mann &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Resolves 1837, c.75, passed April 12, 1837 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/t0yzt2
title: Replication data for: Posturing Parliaments: Ratification, Uncertainty, and International Bargaining

description: Proposed international agreements generally need to be explicitly or implicitly ratified by domestic agents, most often legislatures. In these circumstances, legislators will attempt to capitalize on uncertainty about their intentions using costless signaling, or cheap talk. How credible is such parliamentary posturing? Existing studies varyingly discount it or credit it with infinite efficacy. This dissertation seeks to redress the indeterminacy of the effect of domestic politics on international bargaining when uncertainty prevails at home.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;  Drawing on a formal model, the argument focuses on the strategic consequences of varying degrees of uncertainty about the intentions of legislators. Under greater uncertainty, legislative rhetoric takes on an all or nothing character, polarizing internal debate. One consequence is that uncertainty promotes the prospects for (efficient) international cooperation. A second result is that uncertainty deprives the executive of her ability to capitalize on the existence of a moderate
opposition in the legislature for bargaining advantage vis-à-vis a foreign negotiator. That is, uncertainty reduces the state's bargaining power.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;  The dissertation shows how specific domestic institutions contribute to uncertainty, including parliamentary/presidential regimes, party structure, legislative organization, electoral rules, and election timing. Utilizing a new database of 256 trade disputes conducted under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) from 1948 to 1993, the dissertation quantitatively establishes a strong link between uncertainty-promoting domestic institutions and the efficiency and distrib
utional characteristics of bargaining outcomes. In addition, three case studies trace the causal process posited by the dissertation, from the specified domestic institutions, to uncertainty, to legislators' signaling behavior, and finally to the impact of that signaling on international bargaining. The results of both em
pirical tests strongly support the domestic institutional argument put forth in the dissertation.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;  The dissertation contributes by providing a determinate picture of the role of legislative signaling in international bargaining. Parliamentary posturing matters. Because of legislative signaling, uncertainty has some very counterintuitive effects: it can actually promote international cooperation. The dissertation also contributes by providing a coherent picture of the international consequences of a wide variety of domestic institutions.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/t2qxa6
title: 2014 Romanian Election Studies (RES 2014)
title: 2014 Romanian Presidential Elections

description: 2014 Romanian Presidential Elections. Research grant: Change and stability of electoral behavior in Romania: 2009-2014. Director: Mircea Comsa. CNCS-UEFISCDI code: PN-II-ID-PCE-2011-3-0669. Data collection: CSOP. Cross-sectional survey: after the elections (1, TAPI). The datasets and questionnaires are all in the Romanian language.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/evecpe
title: CES 2020, Team Module of University of Massachusetts, Boston (UMB)

description: This dataverse contains the data and supporting documents for the CES 2020 Team Module of the University of Massachusetts, Boston. This project was supported by the National Science Foundation, Grant Number SES-1948863.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/fojpbt
title: Belarus 2020 Election Twitter

description: Russian language Twitter data emerging from Belarus before and after its presidential election of 9 August 2020. Data must be rehydrated for use.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/g6j4h7
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 85-1022
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/k0ajd7
title: McCormick, M., More, A. F. et al. 2018. "Expanded Draft 4: Western European Climate from Written Sources, Reports, ca. 800 to ca. 1300," DARMC Scholarly Data Series, Data Contribution Series 2018-2. DARMC, Center for Geographic Analysis, Harvard University, Cambridge MA 02138

description: McCormick, M., More, A. F. et al. 2018. "Expanded Draft 4: Western European Climate from Written Sources, Reports, ca. 800 to ca. 1300," DARMC Scholarly Data Series, Data Contribution Series 2018-2. DARMC, Center for Geographic Analysis, Harvard University, Cambridge MA 02138.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/n6f3wu
title: Replication Data for: Random Discounted Expected Utility

description: Review of Economics and Statistics: Forthcoming.
description: Volume XX, Issue X
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/qiohmc
title: State Responses to Immigration Database
title: Migration Policy Institute

description: Users can search this database of immigration-related bills and resolutions introduced in state legislatures. Topics include: immigration enforcement initiatives, employment regulations, and health-related bills.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Background&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt; The State Responses to Immigration Database was created by the Migration Policy Institute (MPI) and a research team at New York University (NYU) School of Law. This database provides information regarding immigration-related bills and resolutions introduced in state legislatures. Topics include immigration enforcement initiatives, employment regulations, and health-related bills. &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;User Functionality&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt; Users can search legislation by state, region, subject
area, legislative type and bill status. &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Data Notes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;The database contains 1,059 immigration-related bills from the 2007 state legislative session. According to the website, legislation data for 2008, as well as 2001 through 2006 data will be added in the coming months. Data are available on a national, state, and regional level.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/smbfoz
title: Replication Data for: Preference Representation and the Influence of Political Parties in Majoritarian vs. Proportional Systems: An Empirical Test

description: Electoral systems determine the role that representatives’ party affiliations play in political representation. According to conventional expectations, party affiliation drives the behavior of representatives when they are elected under a proportional system, while majoritarian systems mute the role of party affiliation by forcing politicians to converge to the median position of their constituency. This study directly tests these predictions within a common party system by matching referenda decisions of constituents with voting behavior of their representatives who are elected either under a majoritarian or proportional system.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/t5zwh2
title: Annual Temperature
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ysnyxd
title: Perceptions of Electoral Integrity, (PEI-8.0)

description: This dataset by the Electoral Integrity Project evaluates the quality of elections held around the world. Based on a rolling survey collecting the views of election experts, this research provides independent and reliable evidence to compare whether countries meet international standards of electoral integrity. PEI-8.0 cumulative release covers 480 national parliamentary and presidential contests held worldwide in 169 countries from 1 July 2012 to 31 December 2021. For each contest, approximately 40 election experts receive an electronic invitation to fill the survey. The survey includes assessments from 4,591 election experts, with a mean response rate of 23%. The study collects 49 indicators to compare elections. These indicators are clustered to evaluate eleven stages in the electoral cycle as well as generating an overall summary Perception of Electoral Integrity (PEI) 100-point index and comparative ranking. The datasets are available for analysis at three levels: COUNTRY-level (169 observations); ELECTION-level (479 observations), and also EXPERT-level (4,590 observations). Each dataset can be downloaded in STATA, CSV, and EXCEL formats.
description: STATA, 17
description: Perceptions of Electoral Integrity Index
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/6hkkei
title: Loan Tracker of the IDEA Project for north-west region (Rajshahi and Rangpur Divisions ) of Bangladesh

description: The IDEA project's Financial Institutions (FIs) and Micro Finance Institutions (MFIs) partners provide information on loan disbursement, the number of beneficiaries/borrowers, and the amount of loans disbursed, and this information is projected through loan tracking dashboard. This also provides information on the number of supply chain actors having access to formal financial services through the project.
description: Type: Dataset; Sub-type(s): Other (survey data)
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/dxezam
title: Replication Data for: Do Voters Want Domestic Politicians to Scrutinize the European Union?

description: In light of important political events that go beyond the nation state (e.g., migration, climate change, the coronavirus pandemic), domestic politicians are increasingly pressured to scrutinize and speak out on European policy-making. This creates a potential trade-off between allocating effort to domestic and supranational affairs, respectively. We examine how citizens perceive legislator involvement in European Union (EU) politics with a pre-registered conjoint experiment in Germany. Our results show that Members of Parliament (MPs) are not disadvantaged when allocating effort to European affairs as compared to local and national affairs. In addition, voters tend to prefer MPs who engage in EU policy reform over those who do not. As demand for legislator involvement in European politics is on the rise, we provide empirical evidence that MPs can fulfill this demand without being disadvantaged by the electorate.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ejwxao
title: Replication Data For: A Populist Paradox? How Brexit Softened Anti-Immigrant Attitudes

description: Recent political contests across Europe and North America have been propelled by a wave of populist, anti-immigrant resentment, and it was widely expected that these populist victories would further fan the flames of xenophobia. We implemented an experimental design around the Brexit referendum to test how populist victories shape anti-immigrant attitudes. We find that anti-immigrant attitudes actually softened after the Brexit referendum, among both Leave and Remain supporters, and these effects persisted for several months. How could a right-wing, populist victory soften anti-immigrant attitudes? We use causal mediation analysis to understand this 'populist paradox.' Among Leavers, a greater sense of control over immigration channelled the effects of the Brexit outcome onto anti-immigrant attitudes. But it is individuals' efforts to distance themselves from accusations of xenophobia and racism that explains why we see a softening of attitudes towards immigration among both Leavers and Remainers.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/mn4rar
title: Replication Data for: Populism and the affective partisan space in nine European publics: Evidence from a cross-national survey

description: Datasets and code used for conducting all analyses and creating all figures for this publication.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/pdnwkl
title: Replication Data for: Ellis et al. (2012)

description: &lt;p&gt;This Dataverse Provides Replication Data and Associated Datasets for:&lt;/p&gt;
Ellis et al. 2012. All is not loss: plant biodiversity in the Anthropocene. &lt;em&gt;PLoS ONE&lt;/em&gt; 7:e30535. &lt;strong&gt;doi: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030535"&gt; 10.1371/journal.pone.0030535&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;The dataset is shared in three files:&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;1. Online Appendices for the paper&lt;/strong&gt; (in one .zip file)&lt;br/&gt;
File = ellis_2012_appendices.zip&lt;br/&gt;
&gt;&gt; Detailed methods (PDF)&lt;br/&gt;
&gt;&gt; Global statistics (Excel file)&lt;br/&gt;
&gt;&gt; Supplementary Maps (PDF)&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;2. Maps in ESRI Shapefile format&lt;/strong&gt; (in one .zip file)&lt;br/&gt;
File = ellis_2012_shapefile.zip&lt;br/&gt;
Global dataset with all main plant species richness variables.&lt;br/&gt;
Geometry: This is a Level 8 ISEA Discrete Global Grid (DGG) an equal area mapping system with 16,805 hexagonal DGG cells with area of ~7800 km&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; per DGG cell.&lt;br/&gt;
&gt; Readme.txt describes data structure&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;3. Plant Species Richness Data in Excel&lt;/strong&gt; (one .zip file)&lt;br/&gt;
File = ellis_2012_data.zip&lt;br/&gt;
The global dataset in Excel format.&lt;br/&gt;
&gt; All main plant species richness variables.&lt;br/&gt;
&gt; Data for all 16,805 hexagonal grid cells.&lt;br/&gt;
&gt; Same data structure as maps in shapefile format.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/thaww
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1859, rejected, SC1/series 230, Petition of Albert Hewins

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Against the rendition of fugitive slaves &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11029989"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11029989&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Sharon &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Amasa D. Bacon, Sharon; committee on federal relations &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Albert Hewins&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Joel Hewins&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Sarah J. Hewins&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1859-01-12,1859-01-13 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on January 12, 1859 and referred to the committee on federal relations and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on January 13, 1859 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 21 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 14 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 4 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Other male signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Unidentified signatures: 2 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, [females], [other males], ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1859, rejected &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/y2twl3
title: A16_31452.jpg

description: Link to OCHRE database: &lt;a href = 'http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/4e17ea41-f25c-4333-bfb0-9b0073e41244'&gt;http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/4e17ea41-f25c-4333-bfb0-9b0073e41244
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/yko53w
title: mediator structure

description: &lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;V^{(1)}_t = a_{11}^{t-1} * V^{(1)}_{t - 1} + b_{1}^{t} * \eps^1_t&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;V^{(2)}_t = a_{22}^{t-1} * V^{(2)}_{t - 1} + a_{12}^{t-1} * f(V^{(1)}_{t - 1}) + b_{2}^{t} * \eps^2_t&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;V^{(3)}_t = a_{33}^{t-1} * V^{(3)}_{t - 1} + a_{13}^{t-2} * g(V^{(1)}_{t - 2}) + a_{23}^{t-1} * h(V^{(2)}_{t - 1}) + b_{3}^{t} * \eps^3_t&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;br&gt;

We present below the characteristics of each dataset in the following form: (f(), g(), h(), a_{11}^{t-1} b_{1}^{t} a_{22}^{t-1} b_{2}^{t} a_{33}^{t-1} b_{3}^{t} a_{12}^{t-1} a_{13}^{t-2} a_{23}^{t-1})
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Dataset 1: (abso, abso, cos, 0.4690047938595834 0.1 0.9479395907855845 0.1 0.5268354929774564 0.1 0.48472191233851225 0.6166910968112946 0.4364828031175205)
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Dataset 2: (sin, abso, tanh,-0.3358101964117972 0.1 0.5447388334483942 0.1 -0.593586653252502 0.1 -0.6851570258267166 0.40617918107666995 -0.760348443323906)
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Dataset 3: (sin, tanh, tanh, -0.3103409580696437 0.1 0.19157917654309542 0.1 0.7201756767517731 0.1 0.14770635555285816 -0.7785931638047321 0.653761128421966)
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Dataset 4: (tanh, abso, cos, 0.5660587484803361 0.1 0.47755069621613533 0.1 -0.7429317544856375 0.1 0.4857863582309987 0.9393505225427887 -0.9793254574897177)
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Dataset 5: (abos, abso, sin, -0.4515693667452767 0.1 0.8688127262664711 0.1 0.8937925603149124 0.1 0.5178068614229168 0.21166703751962834 -0.4327175549763074)
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Dataset 6: (abso, abso, tanh, 0.13789374331826032 0.1 -0.8572497357974211 0.1 -0.6032283124007425 0.1 -0.24780360785385924 0.7176426973103909 -0.746883608238494)
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Dataset 7: (tanh, cos, tanh, 0.3419187109634674 0.1 -0.5030340420904331 0.1 -0.31956231453851514 0.1 -0.7011177931845314 0.29670785570237657 0.3665603050569055)
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Dataset 8: (tanh, abso, cos, 0.8317248486186986 0.1 -0.8403220343242301 0.1 0.5142907242113686 0.1 -0.8879223103663403 -0.4081907684569219 -0.7027337629717276)
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Dataset 9: (tanh, tanh, sin, -0.21433143804375399 0.1 0.7106303179780467 0.1 0.13768409633544243 0.1 0.33008135626490676 -0.4739075499050336 0.22206114361940887)
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Dataset 10: (sin, cos, sin, -0.8930925430538972 0.1 -0.554550604752432 0.1 -0.9926898627440199 0.1 0.5123028191188166 0.2582102484789708 -0.23542594375377068)
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/kf0nsr
title: Evaluation of CMAM/IYCF Monitoring Program in Ethiopia

description: The CMAM/IYCF program evaluation is an evaluation made to assess the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, and sustainability related to the CMAM/IYCF program. UNICEF has been supporting the CMAM program, with a particular focus on Severely Acute Malnutrition (SAM) treatment and prevention. UNICEF contracted two national firms to implement the CMAM/IYCF monitoring and capacity strengthening system through 45 monitors in seven regions. The evaluation covered the seven regions and sampled woredas and Health Facilities (HF) from both intervention woredas where CMAM/IYCF monitoring program was implemented and comparison woredas where CMAM/IYCF monitoring program was not implemented.
description: Stata, 14
description: SPSS, 23
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/n7gjyc
title: Data for 'Precise characterization of nanometer-scale systems using interferometric scattering microscopy and Bayesian analysis'

description: Data analyzed in "Precise characterization of nanometer-scale systems
using interferometric scattering microscopy and
Bayesian analysis." See text and supplemental materials for more information.