cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8417366
title: Infinitive constructions in Hungarian

description: This is an open-source dataset containing more than 9 million corpus occurrences of Hungarian infinitive constructions. It consists of the following columns: 1 <em>inf_form</em>: Lowercase form of the infinitive. 2 <em>inf_lemma</em>: Infinitive without inflectional suffixes. If the infinitive has a (separated) preverb, there is a + sign between the preverb and the verb stem. 3 <em>inf_prev</em>: Lowercase form of the preverb associated with the infinitive. 4 <em>inf_prevpos</em>: Position of the preverb relative to the infinitive, given in tokens. 5 <em>inf_stem</em>: Verb stem of the infinitive. 6 <em>inf_persnum</em>: The person and number marking on the infinitive. 7 <em>fin_form</em>: Lowercase finite form (finite verb, plain adjective or noun, complex verb phrase) co-occuring with an infinitive. This heterogeneous set of items will be referred hereafter as FIN. 8 <em>fin_lemma</em>: FIN without inflectional suffixes. If it is a verb having a (separated) preverb, there is a + sign between the preverb and the verb stem. 9 <em>fin_prev</em>: Lowercase form of the preverb associated with the FIN. 10 <em>fin_prevpos</em>: Position of the preverb relative to the FIN, given in tokens. 11 <em>fin_stem</em>: Stem of the FIN. 12 <em>fin_wordclass</em>: Word class of the FIN stem. 13 <em>fin_persnum</em>: The person and number marking on the FIN. 14 <em>order</em>: A schematic representation of how the infinitive, the FIN and their respective preverbs are ordered. 15 <em>argframe_cases</em>: Arguments of the infinitive, represented by case-endings. 16 <em>argframe_long</em>: Arguments of the infinitive, represented by lemma + case-ending combinations. 17 <em>doc_year</em>: The year of writing or the year of publication, 0 if unknown. 18 <em>doc_style</em>: Document style. 19 <em>doc_id</em>: Document identifier. 20 <em>left_context</em>: Text preceding the hit. 21 <em>kwic</em>: The hit (the whole infinitive construction). 22 <em>right_context</em>: Text following the hit. The first row stands for the header. If a cell's value is unspecified, it is marked with underscore (_).
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8417365
title: Infinitive constructions in Hungarian

description: This is an open-source dataset containing more than 9 million corpus occurrences of Hungarian infinitive constructions. It consists of the following columns: 1 <em>inf_form</em>: Lowercase form of the infinitive. 2 <em>inf_lemma</em>: Infinitive without inflectional suffixes. If the infinitive has a (separated) preverb, there is a + sign between the preverb and the verb stem. 3 <em>inf_prev</em>: Lowercase form of the preverb associated with the infinitive. 4 <em>inf_prevpos</em>: Position of the preverb relative to the infinitive, given in tokens. 5 <em>inf_stem</em>: Verb stem of the infinitive. 6 <em>inf_persnum</em>: The person and number marking on the infinitive. 7 <em>fin_form</em>: Lowercase finite form (finite verb, plain adjective or noun, complex verb phrase) co-occuring with an infinitive. This heterogeneous set of items will be referred hereafter as FIN. 8 <em>fin_lemma</em>: FIN without inflectional suffixes. If it is a verb having a (separated) preverb, there is a + sign between the preverb and the verb stem. 9 <em>fin_prev</em>: Lowercase form of the preverb associated with the FIN. 10 <em>fin_prevpos</em>: Position of the preverb relative to the FIN, given in tokens. 11 <em>fin_stem</em>: Stem of the FIN. 12 <em>fin_wordclass</em>: Word class of the FIN stem. 13 <em>fin_persnum</em>: The person and number marking on the FIN. 14 <em>order</em>: A schematic representation of how the infinitive, the FIN and their respective preverbs are ordered. 15 <em>argframe_cases</em>: Arguments of the infinitive, represented by case-endings. 16 <em>argframe_long</em>: Arguments of the infinitive, represented by lemma + case-ending combinations. 17 <em>doc_year</em>: The year of writing or the year of publication, 0 if unknown. 18 <em>doc_style</em>: Document style. 19 <em>doc_id</em>: Document identifier. 20 <em>left_context</em>: Text preceding the hit. 21 <em>kwic</em>: The hit (the whole infinitive construction). 22 <em>right_context</em>: Text following the hit. The first row stands for the header. If a cell's value is unspecified, it is marked with underscore (_).
DOI: 10.25345/c5000099w
title: MassIVE MSV000093065 - Integrated analysis of transcriptomics and proteomics approach the importance of ABA-dependent pathways in Mesembryanthemum Crystallinum leaf during the salt induced C 3 to CAM transition
title: Mesembryanthemum Crystallinum, a facultative CAM plant, shifts from C 3 to CAM photosynthesis under salt stress, enhancing water use efficiency due to inverse stomatal patterns. Exploring the mechanisms of this transition could improve salt tolerance in C 3 crops. We used transcriptomics, proteomics, and targeted metabolomics every 8 hours to track molecular shifts during this transition.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24265708
title: Translanguaging bibliometric analysis (LIN vs. EDU)

description: A bibliometric analysis was carried with SCIMAT software to compare translanguaging research from two different perspectives.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8417473
title: Data for article entitled 'Prediction in SVO and SOV languages: Processing and typological considerations', published in Linguistics

description: see the publication for the description of the data and analysis
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8417472
title: Data for article entitled 'Prediction in SVO and SOV languages: Processing and typological considerations', published in Linguistics

description: see the publication for the description of the data and analysis
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24265591
title: Breeding systems and floral visitation data for <i>Syzygium guineense</i> subsp. <i>barotsense </i>and <i>Julbernardia paniculata</i>.

description: Breeding systems data from a pollination exclusion study and floral visitation data from two species, <i>Syzygium guineense</i> subsp. <i>barotsense</i><i> </i>and <i>Julbernardia paniculata</i><i> </i>(<i>S. guineense</i>:<i> </i><i>n</i>=14 trees, <i>J. paniculata</i>:<i> </i><i>n</i>=12 trees), in Northwestern Zambia south of West Lunga National Park, conducted between 2018 and 2019. Trees were chosen to be generally similar with regards to maturity stage, height, diameter at breast height, and were selected within a small geographic area to control for geographic and climatic differences.<br>Three replicate inflorescences (on average 10.57 ± 0.76 <i>SE</i> individual flowers per inflorescence for <i>S. guineense</i> and 2.13 ± 0.19 <i>SE</i> for <i>J. paniculata</i>) with predominantly unopened flowers, were selected for each of four treatments on each tree (3×4 inflorescences per tree, i.e. 3×4×14= 168 treatment inflorescences for <i>S. guineense</i>, and 3×4×12= 144 treatment inflorescences for <i>J. paniculata</i>), with each treatment being applied to a subset of flowers on separate inflorescences (i.e. only one treatment type was applied per treatment inflorescence). The treatments included: (a) a naturally open-pollinated treatment; (b) a pollinator exclusion treatment for which selected inflorescences were bagged with mesh bags (mesh size ∼1 mm<sup>2</sup>) to prevent pollinators accessing the flowers; (c) a self-pollinated treatment for which treated flowers were bagged before opening and then virgin flowers were pollinated manually with pollen from the same tree and then re-bagged (pollen was taken from a different flower on the tree); (d) a cross-pollinated treatment for which treated flowers were bagged before opening and then virgin flowers were manually treated with cross pollen from a different tree and then re-bagged (for consistency the same pollen donor tree was used for cross pollinations on all experimental trees).<br>Floral observations were conducted during the respective flowering seasons for each species: November 2018 for <i>S. guineense</i> and May 2019 for <i>J. paniculata</i>. A total of 43 × 30-min observations were carried out for <i>S. guineense</i> (21.5 hrs total on 43 different trees), and 41 × 30-min observations for <i>J. paniculata</i> (20.5 hrs total on 41 different trees). Observations were stratified throughout the day to control for diurnal changes in floral visitation and floral visitor behaviour. Floral observation patches within the canopy were reached using the doubled rope tree climbing technique and their size was limited by the number of flowers that could be safely reached enabling the observer to be at least 1.5m away and limited to an area that could be viewed within a single field of view so that no floral visitors would be missed. Floral visitors were identified <i>in situ</i> when possible but when further identification under a microscope was necessary, insects were collected and euthanised.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24265591.v1
title: Breeding systems and floral visitation data for <i>Syzygium guineense</i> subsp. <i>barotsense </i>and <i>Julbernardia paniculata</i>.

description: Breeding systems data from a pollination exclusion study and floral visitation data from two species, <i>Syzygium guineense</i> subsp. <i>barotsense</i><i> </i>and <i>Julbernardia paniculata</i><i> </i>(<i>S. guineense</i>:<i> </i><i>n</i>=14 trees, <i>J. paniculata</i>:<i> </i><i>n</i>=12 trees), in Northwestern Zambia south of West Lunga National Park, conducted between 2018 and 2019. Trees were chosen to be generally similar with regards to maturity stage, height, diameter at breast height, and were selected within a small geographic area to control for geographic and climatic differences.<br>Three replicate inflorescences (on average 10.57 ± 0.76 <i>SE</i> individual flowers per inflorescence for <i>S. guineense</i> and 2.13 ± 0.19 <i>SE</i> for <i>J. paniculata</i>) with predominantly unopened flowers, were selected for each of four treatments on each tree (3×4 inflorescences per tree, i.e. 3×4×14= 168 treatment inflorescences for <i>S. guineense</i>, and 3×4×12= 144 treatment inflorescences for <i>J. paniculata</i>), with each treatment being applied to a subset of flowers on separate inflorescences (i.e. only one treatment type was applied per treatment inflorescence). The treatments included: (a) a naturally open-pollinated treatment; (b) a pollinator exclusion treatment for which selected inflorescences were bagged with mesh bags (mesh size ∼1 mm<sup>2</sup>) to prevent pollinators accessing the flowers; (c) a self-pollinated treatment for which treated flowers were bagged before opening and then virgin flowers were pollinated manually with pollen from the same tree and then re-bagged (pollen was taken from a different flower on the tree); (d) a cross-pollinated treatment for which treated flowers were bagged before opening and then virgin flowers were manually treated with cross pollen from a different tree and then re-bagged (for consistency the same pollen donor tree was used for cross pollinations on all experimental trees).<br>Floral observations were conducted during the respective flowering seasons for each species: November 2018 for <i>S. guineense</i> and May 2019 for <i>J. paniculata</i>. A total of 43 × 30-min observations were carried out for <i>S. guineense</i> (21.5 hrs total on 43 different trees), and 41 × 30-min observations for <i>J. paniculata</i> (20.5 hrs total on 41 different trees). Observations were stratified throughout the day to control for diurnal changes in floral visitation and floral visitor behaviour. Floral observation patches within the canopy were reached using the doubled rope tree climbing technique and their size was limited by the number of flowers that could be safely reached enabling the observer to be at least 1.5m away and limited to an area that could be viewed within a single field of view so that no floral visitors would be missed. Floral visitors were identified <i>in situ</i> when possible but when further identification under a microscope was necessary, insects were collected and euthanised.
DOI: 10.34740/kaggle/dsv/6633500
title: Balochi Language to English Translation Dataset
DOI: 10.25345/c5v698p3g
title: MassIVE MSV000093066 - GNPS BioCC Mixed plant samples
title: Testing raw MS data analysis for the first time from mixed plant samples of a prototype fungicide BioCC+
DOI: 10.21942/uva.24042846.v1
title: Data of the "Treasury Supply Shocks and the Term Structure of Interest Rates in the UK"

description: Data to replicate the results in the paper
DOI: 10.21942/uva.24042822.v2
title: Data of the "Demand shocks for public debt in the Eurozone" paper

description: Replication data of all the results of the paper.
DOI: 10.21942/uva.24042882
title: Data for the paper

description: Data to replicate the results in the paper
DOI: 10.21942/uva.24042882.v1
title: Data for the paper

description: Data to replicate the results in the paper
DOI: 10.21942/uva.24042882.v2
title: Data for the paper

description: Data to replicate the results in the paper
DOI: 10.21942/uva.24042906
title: Replication data

description: Data to replicate the results of the paper
DOI: 10.21942/uva.24042906.v1
title: Replication data

description: Data to replicate the results of the paper
DOI: 10.21942/uva.24042906.v2
title: Replication data

description: Data to replicate the results of the paper
DOI: 10.21942/uva.24042846
title: Data of Supply shock paper

description: Data to replicate the results in the paper
DOI: 10.21942/uva.24042846.v3
title: Data of Supply shock paper

description: Data to replicate the results in the paper
DOI: 10.21942/uva.24042846.v2
title: Data of Supply shock paper

description: Data to replicate the results in the paper
DOI: 10.21942/uva.24042822
title: Data of the demand shock paper

description: data
DOI: 10.21942/uva.24042822.v3
title: Data of the demand shock paper

description: Replication data of all the results of the paper.
DOI: 10.21942/uva.24042822.v4
title: Data of the demand shock paper

description: data
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24265717
title: ECG_sepsis.xlsx

description: This database is created to enable community-based sepsis detection research. It is a subset of MIMIC-III Waveform Database Matched Subset. Sepsis onset is calculated based on Sepsis-3 criteria. Total of 447 patients are included. Further details can be found in our research paper or description file.If you use the annotations, please cite the following paper:..Details about MIMIC III matched subset can be found at Physionet.https://physionet.org/content/mimic3wdb-matched/1.0/<br><br>
DOI: 10.34740/kaggle/dsv/5878810
title: Energy demand hourly dataset of Bangladesh
DOI: 10.34740/kaggle/dsv/6633678
title: prodution about india
DOI: 10.34740/kaggle/dsv/6634286
title: Global Crypto Currency Price Database
DOI: 10.15151/esrf-es-1347248794
title: Structural Biology at EMBL Grenoble, IBS-CIBB and IAB

description: This proposal clusters crystallography and bioSAXS projects at the EMBL Grenoble, IBS-CIBB and IAB. It combines groups working on different topics with a major focus on cell signaling proteins, drug discovery, long non-coding RNAs, nucleic acid-protein complexes, and host-pathogen interactions. The proposers have long-standing experience in the use, as well as the development of beam lines for macromolecular crystallography and biological small angle X-ray scattering and have participated in successive BAG applications over the years, mostly at the ESRF but also at other synchrotrons (i.e. Soleil, Petra III, and Diamond). As Stephen Cusack (former head of EMBL Grenoble) will be retiring at the end of 2023 we propose to change the BAG responsible to Andrew McCarthy for this application round.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8417717
title: ERP_Dataset

description: This dataset contains survey responses regarding the ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) usage experience of workers from shipbuilding and maritime companies in South Korea. <strong>ID</strong>: Unique identifier for each respondent. <strong>Gender</strong>: Respondent's gender (1 for Male, 2 for Female). <strong>Usage Period</strong>: Duration for which the respondent has been using the current system or tool. (1 for Less than 6 months, 2 for 6 months – 1 year, 3 for 1 year – 2 years, 4 for 2 years – 5 years, 5 for More than 5 years) <strong>Age</strong>: Respondent's age. (1 for 10s, 2 for 20s, 3 for 30s, 4 for 40s, 5 for 50s) <strong>Position</strong>: Respondent's position or job title in the organization. (1 for Clerk, 2 for Assistant Manager, 3 for Manager, 4 for Deputy Manager, 5 for General Manager, 6 for Executive Director) <strong>Module</strong>: Specific module or section of the tool/system that the respondent mainly uses. (1 for Operation Management, 2 for Design, 3 for Sales/Business Management, 4 for Materials/Procurement, 5 for Quality Management, 6 for Management/Human Resource, 7 for Finance Accounting, 8 for Other) <strong>SYQ1, SYQ2, SYQ3</strong>: Questions related to System Quality. These are statements or questions gauging the user's perception of the system's reliability, efficiency, etc. <strong>INQ1, INQ2, INQ3</strong>: Questions related to Information Quality. These relate to the accuracy, relevancy, and timeliness of the information provided by the system. <strong>PUS1, PUS2, PUS3</strong>: Questions related to Perceived Usefulness. These are statements or questions assessing how useful the user finds the system in their day-to-day tasks. <strong>SEQ1, SEQ2, SEQ3</strong>: Questions related to Service Quality. These focus on the user's satisfaction with the service/support related to the system. <strong>PEOU1, PEOU2, PEOU3</strong>: Questions related to Perceived Ease of Use. These assess how easy the user finds the system to use and navigate. <strong>IFL1, IFL2, IFL3</strong>: Questions related to another ICT Infrastructure. <strong>ISK1, ISK2, ISK3</strong>: Questions related to ICT Skills. These gauge the user's proficiency or comfort level with ICT tools and technologies. <strong>TMS1, TMS2, TMS3</strong>: Questions related to Top Management Support. These assess the user's perception of how much support and endorsement the system receives from top management. <strong>COI1, COI2, COI3</strong>: Questions related to Continuance Intention. These measure the user's intention to continue using the system in the future.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8417716
title: ERP_Dataset

description: This dataset contains survey responses regarding the ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) usage experience of workers from shipbuilding and maritime companies in South Korea. <strong>ID</strong>: Unique identifier for each respondent. <strong>Gender</strong>: Respondent's gender (1 for Male, 2 for Female). <strong>Usage Period</strong>: Duration for which the respondent has been using the current system or tool. (1 for Less than 6 months, 2 for 6 months – 1 year, 3 for 1 year – 2 years, 4 for 2 years – 5 years, 5 for More than 5 years) <strong>Age</strong>: Respondent's age. (1 for 10s, 2 for 20s, 3 for 30s, 4 for 40s, 5 for 50s) <strong>Position</strong>: Respondent's position or job title in the organization. (1 for Clerk, 2 for Assistant Manager, 3 for Manager, 4 for Deputy Manager, 5 for General Manager, 6 for Executive Director) <strong>Module</strong>: Specific module or section of the tool/system that the respondent mainly uses. (1 for Operation Management, 2 for Design, 3 for Sales/Business Management, 4 for Materials/Procurement, 5 for Quality Management, 6 for Management/Human Resource, 7 for Finance Accounting, 8 for Other) <strong>SYQ1, SYQ2, SYQ3</strong>: Questions related to System Quality. These are statements or questions gauging the user's perception of the system's reliability, efficiency, etc. <strong>INQ1, INQ2, INQ3</strong>: Questions related to Information Quality. These relate to the accuracy, relevancy, and timeliness of the information provided by the system. <strong>PUS1, PUS2, PUS3</strong>: Questions related to Perceived Usefulness. These are statements or questions assessing how useful the user finds the system in their day-to-day tasks. <strong>SEQ1, SEQ2, SEQ3</strong>: Questions related to Service Quality. These focus on the user's satisfaction with the service/support related to the system. <strong>PEOU1, PEOU2, PEOU3</strong>: Questions related to Perceived Ease of Use. These assess how easy the user finds the system to use and navigate. <strong>IFL1, IFL2, IFL3</strong>: Questions related to another ICT Infrastructure. <strong>ISK1, ISK2, ISK3</strong>: Questions related to ICT Skills. These gauge the user's proficiency or comfort level with ICT tools and technologies. <strong>TMS1, TMS2, TMS3</strong>: Questions related to Top Management Support. These assess the user's perception of how much support and endorsement the system receives from top management. <strong>COI1, COI2, COI3</strong>: Questions related to Continuance Intention. These measure the user's intention to continue using the system in the future.
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2h63pj
title: CCDC 2299787: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Arnold L. Rheingold|2023|CSD Communication|||
description: An entry from the Cambridge Structural Database, the world’s repository for small molecule crystal structures. The entry contains experimental data from a crystal diffraction study. The deposited dataset for this entry is freely available from the CCDC and typically includes 3D coordinates, cell parameters, space group, experimental conditions and quality measures.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8417733
title: armandia_brevis_decontaminated_FSCR.fasta.gz

description: .
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8417732
title: armandia_brevis_decontaminated_FSCR.fasta.gz

description: .
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8408935
title: Passive Bias-Free Nonreciprocal Metasurfaces Based on Thermally Nonlinear Quasi-Bound States in the Continuum

description: This dataset contains tabulated versions of the experimental data shown in the pictures of the publication " Passive Bias-Free Nonreciprocal Metasurfaces Based on Thermally Nonlinear Quasi-Bound States in the Continuum".
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8408934
title: Passive Bias-Free Nonreciprocal Metasurfaces Based on Thermally Nonlinear Quasi-Bound States in the Continuum

description: This dataset contains tabulated versions of the experimental data shown in the pictures of the publication " Passive Bias-Free Nonreciprocal Metasurfaces Based on Thermally Nonlinear Quasi-Bound States in the Continuum".
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8417738
title: basileuterus_tristriatus_decontaminated_FSCR.fasta.gz

description: .
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8417737
title: basileuterus_tristriatus_decontaminated_FSCR.fasta.gz

description: .
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8417742
title: catamblyrhynchus_diadema_decontaminated_FSCR.fasta.gz

description: .
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8417741
title: catamblyrhynchus_diadema_decontaminated_FSCR.fasta.gz

description: .
DOI: 10.34740/kaggle/dsv/6634444
title: arXiv Dataset
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8417746
title: cephalothrix_simula_decontamination_FSCR.fasta.gz

description: .
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8417745
title: cephalothrix_simula_decontamination_FSCR.fasta.gz

description: .
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8417748
title: chlorospingus_flavigularis_decontaminated_FSCR.fasta.gz

description: .
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8417747
title: chlorospingus_flavigularis_decontaminated_FSCR.fasta.gz

description: .
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8156522
title: Trialstreamer database (CSV)

description: We provide up-to-date data indexed by Trialstreamer in CSV format.
description: See https://trialstreamer.ieai.robotreviewer.net/ and https://academic.oup.com/jamia/article/27/12/1903/5907063
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8161548
title: Trialstreamer database (CSV)

description: We provide up-to-date data indexed by Trialstreamer in CSV format.
description: See https://trialstreamer.ieai.robotreviewer.net/ and https://academic.oup.com/jamia/article/27/12/1903/5907063
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8161673
title: Trialstreamer database (CSV)

description: We provide up-to-date data indexed by Trialstreamer in CSV format.
description: See https://trialstreamer.ieai.robotreviewer.net/ and https://academic.oup.com/jamia/article/27/12/1903/5907063