DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9874307.v1
title: Does a history of malignancy impact the survival of a subsequent endometrial adenocarcinoma? Should clinical trials eligibility criteria be revisited?

description: We aimed at finding the impact of prior malignancies on the survival of patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma using SEER database (from 1973 to 2014). We identified 127,988 patients who were diagnosed with endometrial adenocarcinoma (6485 had a prior malignancy), and we compared the overall and cancer-specific survival based on the presence or absence of a prior malignancy and the latency period between the two diagnoses using Kaplan–Meier test and Cox models. Adjusted cox models showed that a history of a prior malignancy neither affected the overall survival nor the cancer-specific survival of stage IV cases in all latency groups except the one diagnosed within 1 year of the first cancer. Therefore, there is no rational explanation for excluding stage IV endometrial adenocarcinoma patients with a prior malignancy from clinical trials except for the group that was diagnosed with endometrial adenocarcinoma within 1 year from the first cancer.Impact statement<b>What is already known on this subject?</b> Not enough evidence is found on the impact of prior malignancies on the survival of patients with subsequent endometrial adenocarcinoma.<b>What do the results of this study add?</b> History of a prior malignancy neither affects the overall survival of stage IV endometrial adenocarcinoma nor the cancer-specific survival. Only patients who had their second malignancy diagnosed within one year of the first malignancy should be excluded from clinical trials, while patients diagnosed within one to five years of the first cancer should be encouraged to enrol in clinical trials as they have an enhanced survival than patients without a history of malignancy.<b>What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research?</b> We recommend that future researchers should consider including the aforementioned group of patients in their trials to achieve more accurate results and in order not to strip the patients of potential therapeutic benefits of enrolling in clinical trials. <b>What is already known on this subject?</b> Not enough evidence is found on the impact of prior malignancies on the survival of patients with subsequent endometrial adenocarcinoma. <b>What do the results of this study add?</b> History of a prior malignancy neither affects the overall survival of stage IV endometrial adenocarcinoma nor the cancer-specific survival. Only patients who had their second malignancy diagnosed within one year of the first malignancy should be excluded from clinical trials, while patients diagnosed within one to five years of the first cancer should be encouraged to enrol in clinical trials as they have an enhanced survival than patients without a history of malignancy. <b>What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research?</b> We recommend that future researchers should consider including the aforementioned group of patients in their trials to achieve more accurate results and in order not to strip the patients of potential therapeutic benefits of enrolling in clinical trials.