cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/7dojg5
title: Papers I & II (Battersby et al. 2024a,b)

description: Data products created as part of the 3-D CMZ Papers I & II (Battersby et al. 2024a,b). 

The appendix of Paper I describes the column density and temperature maps in detail, but this information is appended below as well for convenience.

Paper II produced the files: "higalcmz_dendrogram.fits" which contains the full hierarchical dendrogram and "higalcmz_dendrogram_mask" which is a flat image where each pixel corresponds to the highest strucutre number contained in the pixel. 

We combined all the data for Tables 1-4 in Paper II into one megatable, which is released in both fits "MEGATABLE.fits" and simple text file format: "MEGATABLE.tab".

Details of paper I files, repeated from Paper I appendix:
"The data products are all normalized to the same resolution and pixel grid matching our lowest resolution at 36", and are provided for both the inner 7deg of the Galaxy as well as the full inner 40deg of the Galaxy. For each region (inner 7deg and inner 40deg), we provide:

1) a label map showing the location of the source masks (e.g. higalcmz_column_density_inner40deg_label.fits),
2) a column density map with the fore/background-subtracted column density inside the source masks and the smoothed fore/background column density outside the source masks (e.g. higalcmz_column_density_inner40deg.fits),
3) a column density map with only the fore/background-subtracted column density inside the source masks and NaNs outside the source mask (e.g. higalcmz_column_density_source_only_inner40deg.fits),
4) a column density map without any fore/background subtraction (e.g. higalcmz_WITH_BG_column_density_inner40deg.fits),
5) a temperature map with the fore/background-subtracted temperature inside the source masks and the smoothed fore/background temperature outside the source masks (e.g. higalcmz_temperature_inner40deg.fits),
6) a temperature map with the only the fore/background-subtracted temperature inside the source masks and NaNs outside the source mask (e.g. higalcmz_temperature_source_only_inner40deg.fits), and
7) a temperature map without any fore/background subtraction (e.g. higalcmz_WITH_BG_temperature_inner40deg.fits).
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/y6mn5s
title: PDB: 2XWT, Crystal structure of TSH receptor in complex with human mAb autoantibody K1-70 (311K, 38°C, 200 ns): random seed #4 - RMSD, SASA, RMSF, Rg, H-bonds

description: PDB: 2XWT, Crystal structure of TSH receptor in complex with human mAb autoantibody K1-70 (311K, 38°C, 200 ns): random seed #4 - RMSD, SASA, RMSF, Rg, H-bonds
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/gaz5p2
title: Replication Data for: A novel hyperspectral remote sensing technique with hour-hectometer level horizontal distribution of trace gases: to accurately identify emission sources

description: Data available of Journal of Remote Sensing
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/gzmbjg
title: Replication Data for: Scale Effects in Ridesplitting: A Case Study of the City of Chicago

description: This repository contains modified TNC trip data obtained from the Chicago data portal for the year 2019. The raw trip data is first cleaned by removing trivial and erroneous records. This includes short trips with travel times of less than 2 minutes or distances shorter than 0.1 miles. We also exclude entries with missing pickup or dropoff census tract i.e trips originating or ending outside Chicago. Lastly, we remove trips marked as not authorized as shared trips but coded as shared trips. The filtered data is then aggregated by pickup_hour, 'pickup_date, pickup_day, and pickup_month. We also aggregate by census tracts in addition to the earlier ones for detour plots.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/7fcgpa
title: Replication Data for: Reimagining net metering: A polycentric model for equitable solar adoption in the United States

description: Disparities in renewable energy deployment disproportionately afflict marginalized communities and slow the clean energy transition necessary to combat climate change. Most solutions focus on top-down government initiatives to subsidize renewable energy. However, this approach has had mixed efficacy, raises questions about the durability of support, and lacks political feasibility in certain contexts. We propose a new energy development model that leverages the logic of polycentric governance, which refers to having multiple centers of decision-making as opposed to one. Our model rethinks the practice of net metering, where households and organizations can sell excess power back to the grid. Rather than pocketing the proceeds, our model taps into individual altruism by allowing households and organizations to donate some of this money to build renewable energy for underserved communities. This could accelerate clean energy development by providing resources and fostering collaboration between communities and power companies. Our framework represents a novel decentralized approach to a “just energy transition” that complements government-led initiatives. This paper describes the program, discusses design issues, and presents proof-of-concept survey research from the United States.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/xxvi8g
title: Replication Data for: Explaining Indigenous Peoples’ Success in State Supreme Courts: Party Capability, Judicial Selection, and Representation

description: Replication files for JLC article
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/s792ez
title: Wright Files I-Z Edited; Docketed Case: 77-1387
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/dgbuv7
title: Analyzed Data for The Impact of COVID-19 on Technical Services Units Survey Results

description: These datasets contain cleaned data survey results from the October 2021-January 2022 survey titled "The Impact of COVID-19 on Technical Services Units". This data was gathered from a Qualtrics survey, which was anonymized to prevent Qualtrics from gathering identifiable information from respondents. 

These specific iterations of data reflect cleaning and standardization so that data can be analyzed using Python. Ultimately, the three files reflect the removal of survey begin/end times, other data auto-recorded by Qualtrics, blank rows, blank responses after question four (the first section of the survey), and non-United States responses.

Note that State names for "What state is your library located in?" (Q36) were also standardized beginning in Impact_of_COVID_on_Tech_Services_Clean_3.csv to aid in data analysis. In this step, state abbreviations were spelled out and spelling errors were corrected.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/lretm
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1859, rejected, SC1/series 230, Petition of George Prentice

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Against the rendition of fugitive slaves &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11029869"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11029869&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Greenfield &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: George D. Wells, Greenfield; committee on federal relations &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;George Prentice&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Mary A. Fisher&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Salome P. Osborn&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1859-01-19,1859-01-20 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on January 19, 1859 and referred to the committee on federal relations and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on January 20, 1859 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 72 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 23 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 16 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Unidentified signatures: 33 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, [females], ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: not column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1859, rejected &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/rhpszd
title: Replication Data for: Constitutional Reform and the Gender Diversification of Peak Courts

description: Data and code for all figures and tables in "Constitutional Reform and the Gender Diversification of Peak Courts," forthcoming at the APSR. 

Do the processes states use to select judges for peak courts influence gender diversity? Scholars have debated whether concentrating appointment power in a single individual or diffusing appointment power across many individuals best promotes gender diversification. Others have claimed that the precise structure of the process matters less than fundamental changes in the process. We clarify these theoretical mechanisms, derive testable implications concerning the appointment of the first woman to a state's highest court, and then develop a matched-pair research design within a Rosenbaum randomization inference approach to observational studies. Using a global sample beginning in 1970, we find that constitutional change to the judicial selection process decreases the time until the appointment of the first woman justice. These results reflect claims that point to institutional disruptions as critical drivers of gender diversity on important political posts
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/mjifz
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1860, leave to withdraw, SC1/series 231, Petition of John R. Thurston

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Against slave hunting &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858717"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858717&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Rockport &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: John J. Babson, Gloucester; committee on federal relations &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;John R. Thurston&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Benjamin Marshall&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;James Griffin&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1860-02-04,1860-02-06 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on February 4, 1860 and referred to the committee on federal relations and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on February 6, 1860 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 112 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 112 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, legal voters, ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1860, leave to withdraw &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/wbdqht
title: When the Law is Silent. Hate Crime Prosecution and Implicit Bias in Law Enforcement Agencies: A Romanian survey dataset

description: This dataset aims to investigate the prosecution of hate crimes in Romania, with a specific focus on antisemitism, by looking into intrinsic motivations among the prosecutors.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/hlqwy
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1860, leave to withdraw, SC1/series 231, Petition of J.H. Doane

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: To extend invitation to participate in hospitalities to several states &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858744"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858744&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1860-02-16 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Boston &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Carver Hotchkiss, Franklin; committee on federal relations &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;J.H. Doane&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;George Allen&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;James E. Taylor&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1860-02-18,1860-02-20 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the Senate on February 18, 1860 and referred to the committee on federal relations and sent for concurrence and received in the House on February 20, 1860 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 41 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 41 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: To aid the petition of Josiah Perham &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1860, leave to withdraw &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/mkslok
title: Restricted Access WFHS Tomo 6-month Process Evaluation – Employee Behavior Tracking Data

description: Release 4 of the restricted-access data for the Work, Family & Health Study collected at the Tomo (IT) industry workplaces.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/tmua0
title: Council; Council Files August 29, 1845, Case of Orrin de Wolf, GC3/series 378, Petition of George Estabrook

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Execution case &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:12233029"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:12233029&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1845-07 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Rutland &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;George Estabrook&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Zadock W. Gates&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Joseph Miles&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 70 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 70 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Orrin de Wolf &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Governor Council Files, August 29, 1845, Case of Orrin de Wolf &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.15468/dl.nxdf3x
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 9737 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 "BasisOfRecord is one of (Human Observation, Machine Observation, Occurrence evidence, Observation)",
 "TaxonKey is one of (Estrilda melpoda (Vieillot, 1817))",
 "Country is one of (Algeria, Angola, Benin, Botswana, British Indian Ocean Territory, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cabo Verde, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo, Congo, Democratic Republic of the, Côte d’Ivoire, Djibouti, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Eswatini, Ethiopia, French Southern Territories, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mayotte, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Réunion, Rwanda, Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, South Sudan, Sudan, Tanzania, United Republic of, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Western Sahara, Zambia, Zimbabwe)"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 9737 records from 44 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0015230-250525065834625/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/q742lx
title: modbm_lin_box_2_30

description: The first colored senator and representatives, in the 41st and 42nd Congress of the United States
description: URN-3:FHCL.HOUGH:101212074
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/rkzi7y
title: Replication Data for: Micro-level Drivers of Turkey’s Strategic Reorientation: Making Sense of the Public Opinion towards the United States

description: Replication .do and .dta files.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/85siir
title: Wright Files I-Z Edited; Docketed Case: 80-1124
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/dqbvou
title: Spectral Reference Database for the Analysis and Identification of Indian Pigments

description: A collection of 41 Indian pigments from the workshop of traditional miniature painter, Mr. Babulal Marotia, were characterized using transmission Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, fiber optics reflectance spectroscopy (FORS), and Raman spectroscopy. The resulting spectra can be found in this dataset. The pigments are referred to by their traditional Hindi names. 

Transmission FTIR: Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) in transmission mode was performed using a Bruker Vertex 70 infrared bench spectrometer coupled to a Bruker Hyperion 3000 infrared microscope. Pigments were compressed onto a diamond cell with a stainless-steel roller prior to analysis. Using the Bruker OPUS (version 6.0) software, spectra were recorded between 4000 and 600 cm-1 at 4 cm-1 spectral resolution and 32 scans per spectrum. 

FORS: Spectrometer: Ocean Optics FLAME Visible/near IR spectrometer, range 350-1000 nm, typical optical resolution 1.33 nm. Halogen light source: Ocean Optics HIL-2000-FHSA. Reflection/backscatter fiber optic probe used to acquire data. Data acquired with Ocean Optics “OceanView” software.

Raman: Raman analysis was conducted using a Bruker Optics Senterra dispersive Raman microscope with an Olympus BX51M microscope equipped with 20x and 50x long working distance objectives and using the Bruker OPUS (version 7.5) software. The Raman spectrometer has three laser sources, 532 nm, 633 nm, and 785 nm. The optimum laser source depends on the pigment analyzed but in general, blue, and green pigments were predominantly analyzed with the 532 nm laser at 2 mW or 5 mW power and other colors analyzed with the 785 nm laser at 10 mW power. The exception is Menil (MCH.12), which was analyzed with the 785 nm laser at 1 mW power.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/rfc66f
title: Appendix for What do ‘Left Behind Communities’ Want? A Qualitative Study in the United Kingdom using Photo Elicitation

description: Appendix for "What do ‘Left Behind Communities’ Want? A Qualitative Study in the United Kingdom using Photo Elicitation". The Appendix contains:

· ethics certificates or similar approvals; 
· any interview guides or related protocols used during data collection or analysis;
· a description of the documents, including (if relevant) of archives and their contents, including how access was obtained and what limitations on dissemination of primary data were imposed, if any;
· further analysis of positionality in the field, the methods deployed, and how positionality affected the data collected.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/a22hc
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1839, Docket 10525, SC1/series 231, Petition of Margaret Fiske

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: To abolish slavery in Washington D.C. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858126"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858126&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Wrentham &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Committee on slavery &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Margaret Fiske&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Sylvia Mann&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Lucy Whiting&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 286 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 286 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: Yes &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: undersigned, [females], ["women"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Needs conservation &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1839, Docket 10525 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ebbabo
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 81-1976
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/trkfvh
title: Canadian Media Ownership Index

description: A comprehensive overview of ownership details of Canada's leading 125 News Media Companies was created in an effort to help with media accountability and transparency.