cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.21227/w7rt-6q71
title: 1.88kW BLDC Sensorless FOC - Sliding Mode vs Flux Observer

description: This dataset is in support of my planned research paper shortly to be submitted to "IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics".In this paper and dataset, speed and the position estimation of BLDC is done using the sensorless vector control method i.e., Field Oriented control (FOC) and observer. The implementation method is the known method of vector control, with the addition of SMO or flux observer gives the estimation of speed and the sensorless rotor position. The switching pattern of the 3-phase inverter is implemented using space vector modulation.DIfferences in this paper dataset can be seen as the author has included following , with analysis which can be drawn from seeing attached graphsperformance comparison using Sliding Mode Observer (SMO) and flux observerPWM switching frequency is varied 44 times from 20 kHz to 2 MHz , - will help decide MOSFETs switching frequency. (as in industries even 20kHz is used)Stability MarginsOpen Loop Control PerformanceTransfer Function CompensationClosed loop TuningRoot Locus of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemBode Plot - magnitude and phasePole Zero Map of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemUnit-Step Response of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemNyquist plot of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemNichols chart of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemImpulse Response of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemSinusoidal ExcitationCompensated System is after using SMO/Flux observer.All this is implemented on 32-bit Real-Time microcontroller. The pins usage not mentioned here are used for other General-Purpose-CAN,USB, RS485 etc.PFC is not included in this simulation as it is assumed that PF = 1.These brushless motors and controllers are used in many industries including medical e.g. in Positive Airway Pressure respirators,ventilator.This study comes in handy to decide when designing in practice for industries and also for academia purposes. The author has used these results in designing new 2-3 different complex models(incomplete), may be uploaded later.There is related dataset, where also 8-pole Y winding motor is used but of different specification - "200W BLDC Sensorless FOC - Sliding Mode vs Flux Observer" ,DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21227/8rz1-p666,
DOI: 10.21227/r6tv-h382
title: 1.88kW BLDC Sensorless FOC - Sliding Mode vs Flux Observer

description: This dataset is in support of my planned research paper shortly to be submitted to "IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics".In this paper and dataset, speed and the position estimation of BLDC is done using the sensorless vector control method i.e., Field Oriented control (FOC) and observer. The implementation method is the known method of vector control, with the addition of SMO or flux observer gives the estimation of speed and the sensorless rotor position. The switching pattern of the 3-phase inverter is implemented using space vector modulation.DIfferences in this paper dataset can be seen as the author has included following , with analysis which can be drawn from seeing attached graphs -performance comparison using Sliding Mode Observer (SMO) and flux observerPWM switching frequency is varied 44 times from 20 kHz to 2 MHz , - will help decide MOSFETs switching frequency. (as in industries even 20kHz is used)Stability MarginsOpen Loop Control PerformanceTransfer Function CompensationClosed loop TuningRoot Locus of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemBode Plot - magnitude and phasePole Zero Map of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemUnit-Step Response of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemNyquist plot of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemNichols chart of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemImpulse Response of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemSinusoidal ExcitationCompensated System is after using SMO/Flux observer.All this is implemented on 32-bit Real-Time microcontroller. The pins usage not mentioned here are used for other General-Purpose-CAN,USB, RS485 etc.PFC is not included in this simulation as it is assumed that PF = 1.These brushless motors and controllers are used in many industries including medical e.g. in Positive Airway Pressure respirators,ventilator.This study comes in handy to decide when designing in practice for industries and also for academia purposes. The author has used these results in designing new 2-3 different complex models(incomplete), may be uploaded later.There is related dataset, where also 8-pole Y winding motor is used but of different specification - "200W BLDC Sensorless FOC - Sliding Mode vs Flux Observer" ,DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21227/8rz1-p666,
DOI: 10.21227/kadq-0z19
title: 1.88kW BLDC Sensorless FOC - Sliding Mode vs Flux Observer

description: This dataset is in support of my planned research paper shortly to be submitted to "IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics".In this paper and dataset, speed and the position estimation of BLDC is done using the sensorless vector control method i.e., Field Oriented control (FOC) and observer. The implementation method is the known method of vector control, with the addition of SMO or flux observer gives the estimation of speed and the sensorless rotor position. The switching pattern of the 3-phase inverter is implemented using space vector modulation.DIfferences in this paper dataset can be seen as the author has included following , with analysis which can be drawn from seeing attached graphs -performance comparison using Sliding Mode Observer (SMO) and flux observerPWM switching frequency is varied 44 times from 20 kHz to 2 MHz , - will help decide MOSFETs switching frequency. (as in industries even 20kHz is used)Stability MarginsOpen Loop Control PerformanceTransfer Function CompensationClosed loop TuningRoot Locus of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemBode Plot - magnitude and phasePole Zero Map of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemUnit-Step Response of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemNyquist plot of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemNichols chart of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemImpulse Response of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemSinusoidal ExcitationCompensated System is after using SMO/Flux observer.All this is implemented on 32-bit Real-Time microcontroller. The pins usage not mentioned here are used for other General-Purpose-CAN,USB, RS485 etc.PFC is not included in this simulation as it is assumed that PF = 1.These brushless motors and controllers are used in many industries including medical e.g. in Positive Airway Pressure respirators,ventilator.This study comes in handy to decide when designing in practice for industries and also for academia purposes. The author has used these results in designing new 2-3 different complex models(incomplete), may be uploaded later.There is related dataset, where also 8-pole Y winding motor is used but of different specification - "200W BLDC Sensorless FOC - Sliding Mode vs Flux Observer" ,DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21227/8rz1-p666,
DOI: 10.21227/2qy3-am04
title: 1.88kW BLDC Sensorless FOC - Sliding Mode vs Flux Observer

description: This dataset is in support of my planned research paper shortly to be submitted to "IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics".In this paper and dataset, speed and the position estimation of BLDC is done using the sensorless vector control method i.e., Field Oriented control (FOC) and observer. The implementation method is the known method of vector control, with the addition of SMO or flux observer gives the estimation of speed and the sensorless rotor position. The switching pattern of the 3-phase inverter is implemented using space vector modulation.DIfferences in this paper dataset can be seen as the author has included following , with analysis which can be drawn from seeing attached graphs -performance comparison using Sliding Mode Observer (SMO) and flux observerPWM switching frequency is varied 45 times from 20 kHz to 2 MHz , - will help decide MOSFETs switching frequency. (as in industries even 20kHz is used)Stability MarginsOpen Loop Control PerformanceTransfer Function CompensationClosed loop TuningRoot Locus of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemBode Plot - magnitude and phasePole Zero Map of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemUnit-Step Response of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemNyquist plot of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemNichols chart of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemImpulse Response of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemSinusoidal ExcitationCompensated System is after using SMO/Flux observer.All this is implemented on 32-bit Real-Time microcontroller. The pins usage not mentioned here are used for other General-Purpose-CAN,USB, RS485 etc.PFC is not included in this simulation as it is assumed that PF = 1.These brushless motors and controllers are used in many industries including medical e.g. in Positive Airway Pressure respirators,ventilator.This study comes in handy to decide when designing in practice for industries and also for academia purposes. The author has used these results in designing new 2-3 different complex models(incomplete), may be uploaded later.There is related dataset, where also 8-pole Y winding motor is used but of different specification - "200W BLDC Sensorless FOC - Sliding Mode vs Flux Observer" ,DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21227/8rz1-p666,
DOI: 10.25919/kpt3-jf28
title: Parkes observations for project P1062 semester 2020APRS_06

description: We propose to monitor the potential repeating FRBs in the Southern Sky with luminosity di- chotomy criterion. With a success of luminosity-guided detection of a repeating source by FAST, we can continue to search for more repeaters hidden in current FRB sample according to luminosity dichotomy. Specifically, we select FRB 171020 and FRB 180923 as the targets of proposed obser- vations, which are located in the repeater population in the luminosity function. We demonstrate that the observing with 20 hours for each source is optimistic using Parkes ultra-wide-bandwidth receiver (UWL), if there are repeaters among them.
DOI: 10.21227/3n99-4516
title: 1.88kW BLDC Sensorless FOC - Sliding Mode vs Flux Observer

description: This dataset is in support of my planned research paper shortly to be submitted to "IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics".In this paper and dataset, speed and the position estimation of BLDC is done using the sensorless vector control method i.e., Field Oriented control (FOC) and observer. The implementation method is the known method of vector control, with the addition of SMO or flux observer gives the estimation of speed and the sensorless rotor position. The switching pattern of the 3-phase inverter is implemented using space vector modulation.DIfferences in this paper dataset can be seen as the author has included following , with analysis which can be drawn from seeing attached graphs -performance comparison using Sliding Mode Observer (SMO) and flux observerPWM switching frequency is varied 45 times from 20 kHz to 2 MHz , - will help decide MOSFETs switching frequency. (as in industries even 20kHz is used)Stability MarginsOpen Loop Control PerformanceTransfer Function CompensationClosed loop TuningRoot Locus of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemBode Plot - magnitude and phasePole Zero Map of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemUnit-Step Response of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemNyquist plot of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemNichols chart of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemImpulse Response of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemSinusoidal ExcitationCompensated System is after using SMO/Flux observer.All this is implemented on 32-bit Real-Time microcontroller. The pins usage not mentioned here are used for other General-Purpose-CAN,USB, RS485 etc.PFC is not included in this simulation as it is assumed that PF = 1.These brushless motors and controllers are used in many industries including medical e.g. in Positive Airway Pressure respirators,ventilator.This study comes in handy to decide when designing in practice for industries and also for academia purposes. The author has used these results in designing new 2-3 different complex models(incomplete), may be uploaded later.There is related dataset, where also 8-pole Y winding motor is used but of different specification - "200W BLDC Sensorless FOC - Sliding Mode vs Flux Observer" ,DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21227/8rz1-p666,
DOI: 10.21227/zjmp-af60
title: 1.88kW BLDC Sensorless FOC - Sliding Mode vs Flux Observer

description: This dataset is in support of my planned research paper shortly to be submitted to "IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics".In this paper and dataset, speed and the position estimation of BLDC is done using the sensorless vector control method i.e., Field Oriented control (FOC) and observer. The implementation method is the known method of vector control, with the addition of SMO or flux observer gives the estimation of speed and the sensorless rotor position. The switching pattern of the 3-phase inverter is implemented using space vector modulation.DIfferences in this paper dataset can be seen as the author has included following , with analysis which can be drawn from seeing attached graphs -performance comparison using Sliding Mode Observer (SMO) and flux observerPWM switching frequency is varied 45 times from 20 kHz to 2 MHz , - will help decide MOSFETs switching frequency. (as in industries even 20kHz is used)Stability MarginsOpen Loop Control PerformanceTransfer Function CompensationClosed loop TuningRoot Locus of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemBode Plot - magnitude and phasePole Zero Map of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemUnit-Step Response of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemNyquist plot of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemNichols chart of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemImpulse Response of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemSinusoidal ExcitationCompensated System is after using SMO/Flux observer.All this is implemented on 32-bit Real-Time microcontroller. The pins usage not mentioned here are used for other General-Purpose-CAN,USB, RS485 etc.PFC is not included in this simulation as it is assumed that PF = 1.These brushless motors and controllers are used in many industries including medical e.g. in Positive Airway Pressure respirators,ventilator.This study comes in handy to decide when designing in practice for industries and also for academia purposes. The author has used these results in designing new 2-3 different complex models(incomplete), may be uploaded later.There is related dataset, where also 8-pole Y winding motor is used but of different specification - "200W BLDC Sensorless FOC - Sliding Mode vs Flux Observer" ,DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21227/8rz1-p666,
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12089412
title: Additional Data

description: additional files for RNA seqFISH, DNA seqFISH+ and sequential immunofluorescence.<br>DNAseqFISH+.zip contains DNA seqFISH+ pixel locations for 3,600 loci in single cells (pixel sizes are 103 nm for x and y, and 250 nm for z).<br><br>RNA seqFISH.zip contains RNA seqFISH expression profiles for mRNAs and introns in single cells. Cells were filtered out if keep1 column is 0 due to the laser illumination bias.<br>Excel file contains additional information for sequential immunofluorescence experiments.
DOI: 10.21227/4z9w-3y83
title: 1.88kW BLDC Sensorless FOC - Sliding Mode vs Flux Observer

description: This dataset is in support of my planned research paper shortly to be submitted to "IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics".In this paper and dataset, speed and the position estimation of BLDC is done using the sensorless vector control method i.e., Field Oriented control (FOC) and observer. The implementation method is the known method of vector control, with the addition of SMO or flux observer gives the estimation of speed and the sensorless rotor position. The switching pattern of the 3-phase inverter is implemented using space vector modulation.DIfferences in this paper dataset can be seen as the author has included following , with analysis which can be drawn from seeing attached graphs -performance comparison using Sliding Mode Observer (SMO) and flux observerPWM switching frequency is varied 45 times from 20 kHz to 2 MHz , - will help decide MOSFETs switching frequency. (as in industries even 20kHz is used)Stability MarginsOpen Loop Control PerformanceTransfer Function CompensationClosed loop TuningRoot Locus of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemBode Plot - magnitude and phasePole Zero Map of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemUnit-Step Response of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemNyquist plot of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemNichols chart of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemImpulse Response of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemSinusoidal Excitation as BLDC can be driven non-sinusoidallyCompensated System is after using SMO/Flux observer.All this is implemented on 32-bit Real-Time microcontroller. The pins usage not mentioned here are used for other General-Purpose-CAN,USB, RS485 etc.PFC is not included in this simulation as it is assumed that PF = 1.These brushless motors and controllers are used in many industries including medical e.g. in Positive Airway Pressure respirators,ventilator.This study comes in handy to decide when designing in practice for industries and also for academia purposes. The author has used these results in designing new 2-3 different complex models(incomplete), may be uploaded later.There is related dataset, where also 8-pole Y winding motor is used but of different specification - "200W BLDC Sensorless FOC - Sliding Mode vs Flux Observer" ,DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21227/8rz1-p666,
DOI: 10.21227/xa1f-3k87
title: 1.88kW BLDC Sensorless FOC - Sliding Mode vs Flux Observer

description: This dataset is in support of my planned research paper shortly to be submitted to "IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics".In this paper and dataset, speed and the position estimation of BLDC is done using the sensorless vector control method i.e., Field Oriented control (FOC) and observer. The implementation method is the known method of vector control, with the addition of SMO or flux observer gives the estimation of speed and the sensorless rotor position. The switching pattern of the 3-phase inverter is implemented using space vector modulation.DIfferences in this paper dataset can be seen as the author has included following , with analysis which can be drawn from seeing attached graphs -performance comparison using Sliding Mode Observer (SMO) and flux observerPWM switching frequency is varied 45 times from 20 kHz to 2 MHz , - will help decide MOSFETs switching frequency. (as in industries even 20kHz is used)Stability MarginsOpen Loop Control PerformanceTransfer Function CompensationClosed loop TuningRoot Locus of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemBode Plot - magnitude and phasePole Zero Map of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemUnit-Step Response of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemNyquist plot of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemNichols chart of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemImpulse Response of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemSinusoidal Excitation as BLDC can be driven non-sinusoidallyCompensated System is after using SMO/Flux observer.All this is implemented on 32-bit Real-Time microcontroller. The pins usage not mentioned here are used for other General-Purpose-CAN,USB, RS485 etc.PFC is not included in this simulation as it is assumed that PF = 1.These brushless motors and controllers are used in many industries including medical e.g. in Positive Airway Pressure respirators,ventilator.This study comes in handy to decide when designing in practice for industries and also for academia purposes. The author has used these results in designing new 2-3 different complex models(incomplete), may be uploaded later.There is related dataset, where also 8-pole Y winding motor is used but of different specification - "200W BLDC Sensorless FOC - Sliding Mode vs Flux Observer" ,DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21227/8rz1-p666,
DOI: 10.21227/6799-td90
title: 1.88kW BLDC Sensorless FOC - Sliding Mode vs Flux Observer

description: This dataset is in support of my planned research paper shortly to be submitted to "IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics".In this paper and dataset, speed and the position estimation of BLDC is done using the sensorless vector control method i.e., Field Oriented control (FOC) and observer. The implementation method is the known method of vector control, with the addition of SMO or flux observer gives the estimation of speed and the sensorless rotor position. The switching pattern of the 3-phase inverter is implemented using space vector modulation.DIfferences in this paper dataset can be seen as the author has included following , with analysis which can be drawn from seeing attached graphs -performance comparison using Sliding Mode Observer (SMO) and flux observerPWM switching frequency is varied 45 times from 20 kHz to 2 MHz , - will help decide MOSFETs switching frequency. (as in industries even 20kHz is used)Stability MarginsOpen Loop Control PerformanceTransfer Function CompensationClosed loop TuningRoot Locus of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemBode Plot - magnitude and phasePole Zero Map of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemUnit-Step Response of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemNyquist plot of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemNichols chart of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemImpulse Response of Uncompensated System and Compensated SystemSinusoidal Excitation as BLDC can be driven non-sinusoidallyCompensated System is after using SMO/Flux observer.All this is implemented on 32-bit Real-Time microcontroller. The pins usage not mentioned here are used for other General-Purpose-CAN,USB, RS485 etc.PFC is not included in this simulation as it is assumed that PF = 1.These brushless motors and controllers are used in many industries including medical e.g. in Positive Airway Pressure respirators,ventilator.This study comes in handy to decide when designing in practice for industries and also for academia purposes. The author has used these results in designing new 2-3 different complex models(incomplete), may be uploaded later.There is related dataset, where also 8-pole Y winding motor is used but of different specification - "200W BLDC Sensorless FOC - Sliding Mode vs Flux Observer" ,DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21227/8rz1-p666,
DOI: 10.21227/6s44-8230
title: 200W BLDC Sensorless FOC - Sliding Mode vs Flux Observer

description: This dataset is in support of my planned research paper shortly to be submitted to "IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics".In the dataset "1.88kW BLDC Sensorless FOC - Sliding Mode vs Flux Observer", DOI: https://dx.doi.org/yrb7-hp33 , BLDC motor is 8-pole, Star winding with rated rpm of 3 000 rpm at rated power of 1.88 kW.In this dataset, the same methodology is used but the BLDC motor is 8-pole ,Star winding with rated rpm of 14 400 rpm at rated power of 211 W.