cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/8z68ju
title: Replication Data for: Courts as extra-cabinet control mechanisms for secondary legislation: evidence from Italy

description: Ministers can have an incentive to adopt policies through secondary legislation that deviates from the gen- eral compromise reached via the primary legislation. We suggest that when secondary legislation is at stake, in some countries coalition partners can rely upon the ex-ante legal scrutiny of courts as an extra-cabinet control mechanism. We focus on the interaction between governments and the Council of State, the highest administrative court and the most important consultative body of the government in Italy. Our findings support the general hypothesis that the Council’s activism as an advisor is generated by the demand for control mechanisms on the secondary legislation. Such a demand is affected by specific political conditions, i.e. the level of government heterogeneity and government alternation. The findings on the Italian case can be a starting point for research on the different levels of involvement of adminis- trative courts in the executive politics that characterize European Democracies.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/iihgpj
title: Replication Data for: "Do States Really Sink Costs to Signal Resolve?"

description: Replication Data for: "Do States Really Sink Costs to Signal Resolve?" This article (co-authored with Kai Quek) is forthcoming at the Journal of Global Security Studies
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/7e1b9
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1839, Docket 10525, SC1/series 231, Petition of Richard Clap

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: To abolish slavery in Washington D.C. and against the admission of Florida and slave states &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11857901"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11857901&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Dorchester &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Elijah Vose, Dorchester &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Richard Clap&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Frederick Clapp&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;John Field&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 100 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 100 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, ["signers"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1839, Docket 10525 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/doctaw
title: CLA-20-06-1335_revised: SUPPLEMENTARY FILES FOR: Converging on the orb: denser taxon sampling elucidates spider phylogeny and new analytical methods support repeated evolution of the orb web

description: Supplementary material for the manuscript
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/krgy9t
title: Actos Comunes de los Jurados de Zaragoza

description: Base de datos
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/d7v4xs
title: Perfecting Imperfect Competition [Dataset]

description: This paper addresses the reduction of market failure under imperfect competition. It proposes a tax-scheme that provides firms with an incentive to forgo their market power: Firms optimize after‐tax profits. Now simply consider a firm’s gross profit margin the unique tax‐rate it is charged on absolute profits. In theory the firm’s tax‐rate would be the mark‐up over marginal costs, the firm’s Lerner index. As a result every firm determines its own tax‐rate by setting its price and incurring costs. This creates a new trade off for firms between a low tax‐burden and the exercising of market power. Welfare for society increases since firms with market power choose a lower price and produce a quantity closer or equal to social optimum; at the original monopolistic price‐level they can increase their profits by lowering their tax‐burden. Essentially the tax‐condition does not seem to distort profit incentives or markets; under perfect competition the tax‐rate would be zero. Thus, it is clear that the tax only takes effect when markets work inefficiently and its countervailing nature subsequently helps to remedy inefficiencies of imperfectly competitive markets.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/g6k1f2
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Misc. 2577
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/5wpxk8
title: Food Safety Domain: Prevalence of Salmonella enterica Isolated from Environmental Food Surfaces from Informal Markets in Cambodia.

description: This data was created from an observational study conducted in informal markets in Cambodia. Food contact surfaces (FCS, n=3) and non-food contact surfaces (NFCS, n=3) samples were collected from each vendor (n=16) from each location (n=2) in each season (n=2), with a total of n=384 samples.This dataset was created from results of an observational study conducted in two provinces of Cambodia. Two markets were sampled during two seasons: (1) rainy season (May to November) (2) dry season (December to April) as identified by (Culas & Tek, 2016). Data was collected in January 2018 and June 2018. This dataset was collected through research of the project "Integrated Horticulture Livestock Systems" lead by Kansas State University, in partnership with the Royal University of Agriculture, as a part of the Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Horticulture.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/cn5mbg
title: Data: Treaty Lines of Spanish America, 1494-1808

description: Shapefile containing temporally scoped interpretations of various treaty lines between the Spanish and other European nations and the USA since the Tordesillas Treaty (1494). Many lines have three manifestations (Spanish maximum intrpretation, typical interpretation, foreign maximum interpretation). Full metadata in the attached textfile
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/5jkbck
title: Replication Data for publication in PLOS NTD: Tungiasis-related life quality impairment in children living in rural Kenya

description: Tungiasis (sand flea disease) is an ectoparasitosis occurring in South America, the Caribbean and sub-Saharan Africa. It belongs to the so-called 'Neglected Tropical Diseases', a term for a group of diseases affecting the poorest of the poor living in tropical and subtropical conditions and with only very few treatment options. Tungiasis is associated with severe morbidity, not only affecting the physical integrity of its victims, but also being a mental and emotional strain to them. It seems perfectly logical that tungiasis impairs the life quality of infected patients. However, this issue has never been assessed.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/wcxv5k
title: READ ME description of contents

description: contents of two accompanying datasets
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/5xfjdi
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 83-1752
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/rjih4
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1839, Docket 10525, SC1/series 231, Petition of Evelina A.S. Smith

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: To abolish slavery in Washington D.C. and pass several resolutions against slavery &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11857861"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11857861&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Hingham &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Thomas Loring, Hingham &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Evelina A.S. Smith&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Maria A. Sylvester&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Sarah Bassett&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 134 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 134 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: Yes &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: women, [females] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Message to women on back &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1839, Docket 10525 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/gjn63
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1859, rejected, SC1/series 230, Petition of Abner Bicknell

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Against the rendition of fugitive slaves &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11029888"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11029888&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1858-10 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: South Reading &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: J. Parker Gould, Stoneham; committee on federal relations &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Abner Bicknell&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Margaret B. Brown&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Samuel Kimball&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1859-02-08 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on February 8, 1859 and referred to the committee on federal relations and sent for concurrence &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 53 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent for concurrence &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 12 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 24 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Unidentified signatures: 17 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, [females], ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: not column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: High amount of "mrs" &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1859, rejected &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/m5hhwo
title: Massachusetts Archives Collection. v.239-Revolution Resolves, 1783. SC1/series 45X, Petition of Samuel Moody

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Property &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13909143"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13909143&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 17820000 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Newbury &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Samuel Moody&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Samuel Noyes&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1782-11-01,1782-11-02,1782-11-08,1783-02-17,1783-03-01,1783-03-15 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on November 1, 1782 and resolved and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on November 2, 1782 and read and concurred with amendments and sent for concurrence and received in the House on November 8, 1782 and read and concurred and received in the Senate on February 17, 1783 and read and leave to withdraw and sent for concurrence and received in the House on March 1, 1783 and resolved and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on March 15, 1783 and read and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 2 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, resolved, sent, received, read, concurred, amended, sent, received, read, concurred, received, read, leave to withdraw, sent, received, resolved, sent, received, read, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 2 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: guardians and next friends of three poor children belonging to one Joel Weed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Joel Weed, Jeremiah Pearson, Essex, American Army, soldier, veteran, military service, manumission, freedom, house land, Sarah Weed, trespasser, John Hale, [additional documents in volumes, see pages 251-254] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Massachusetts Archives volume 239, pages 255-257 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/qbmscs
title: Knoedler gallery high end market 1871-1934

description: List of all the paintings purchased by the Knoedler gallery between 1871 and 1934 equivalent to $120,000 or more in 2015 dollars. The data set also contains sales prices, culture of origin, profit margins, buyers, sellers, and more.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.u84z7c
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 6 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "GadmGid is CHN.6.4_1",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 "TaxonKey is Ixobrychus flavicollis (Latham, 1790)"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 6 records from 1 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0015175-250525065834625/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/7e7mks
title: California Poll: 7102 -- April 24 - May 2, 1971

description: The Field Poll, established in 1945 as The California Poll by Mervin Field, has operated continuously as an independent, non-partisan, media-sponsored public opinion news service. Each year the Field Polls cover a wide range of political and social topics examining California public opinion. Continuing measures are made of voter support for leading political figures vying for major state and federal offices, job ratings of important political figures and reactions to significant political events. Voter awareness, understanding and predispositions of major campaign issues and salient statewide ballot propositions are also tracked over time. For poll 7102 N=1050.
description: Subject: STANDARD DEPOSIT TERMS 1.0 Type: DATAPASS:TERMS:STANDARD:1.0 Notes: The UCLA Social Science Data Archive (“the Archive”) gives permission and any required licenses to Data-PASS to make the Content available for archiving, preservation and access (with permission of the Archive), within the Data Preservation Alliance for the Social Sciences ("Data-PASS") in accordance with the Data-PASS terms (the "Terms") of use (available from: http://www.icpsr.org/Data-PASS). Including permission to: (a) redisseminate copies of the Data Collection in a variety of distribution formats only according to the standard terms of use of the Archive; (b) promote and advertise the Data Collection in any publicity (in any form) for Data-PASS and the Archive; (c) describe, catalog, validate and document the Content; (d) store, translate, copy or re-format the Data Collection in any way to ensure its future preservation and accessibility, improve usability and/or protect respondent confidentiality; (e) incorporate metadata (cataloging information) or documentation regarding this study into public access catalogues. The Archive represents and warrants that the Content conforms to all Terms and that the Archive is lawfully entitled and has full authority to license Data-Pass to use the Materials in the ways described in the Terms.;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/vhq6b
title: Passed Acts; St. 1861, c.91, SC1/series 229, Petition of Henry Barrett

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: For the repeal of the personal liberty laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10668906"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10668906&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Malden &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Richard Ward, Malden; committee on the personal liberty laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Henry Barrett&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Lewis Fisher&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;William B. Shedd&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1861-01-31,1861-02-01 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on January 31, 1861 and referred to the committee on the personal liberty laws and received in the Senate on February 1, 1861 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 152 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 152 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: legal voters &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: St. 1861, c.91, passed March 25, 1861 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/wcrwsl
title: Replication Data for: Hostility and Proselytism of Political Communities - Political activism in the age of social networks
title: Data about positive and negative campaigning of political communities

description: Data to reproduce the analysis of the paper : : Chavalarias D, Gaumont N. and Panahi M. (2019) Hostilité et prosélytisme des communautés politiques : le militantisme politique à l’ère des réseaux sociaux, Réseaux n°214-215
description: Twitter
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/7gjxen
title: The National Labor Force : SAKERNAS, 2003

description: National labor force survey in Indonesia. Survei angkatan kerja nasional. 2003
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/da0ahn
title: ANSWERS_Unit1c_IO_5_SDA

description: Answers to python notebook
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ksstnd
title: Replication Data for: Producing Truth: Public Memory Projects in Post-Violence Societies

description: How do societies remember historical political violence? We draw on an original dataset of more than 150 memorialization projects proposed by truth commissions in 28 post-violence countries, from 1970 to 2018. These projects include the removal of monuments, installation of museums, inauguration of national days of remembrance, and more. Truth commission recommendations data allows us to not only consider memory sites once established, but also to examine blueprints for the types of memory that could have been made. We develop a typology and inductively generate a theory of the political contests and conflicts that different memory projects are likely to trigger–contests and conflicts that we expect, influence the likelihood of project initiation and completion. We conduct an initial probe of the theory using our new data. In so doing, we offer the first systematic, global study of setting and implementing the memorialization agenda in post-violence societies.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/gjanh
title: Passed Acts; St. 1861, c.91, SC1/series 229, Petition of Horatio Moore

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: For the repeal of the personal liberty laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10668968"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10668968&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1861-01-12 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Waltham &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Daniel French, Waltham; committee on the personal liberty laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Horatio Moore&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;George W. Frost&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;William A. Smith&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1861-01-22,1861-01-28 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on January 22, 1861 and referred to the committee on the personal liberty laws and received in the Senate on January 28, 1861 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 94 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 94 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: legal voters &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: St. 1861, c.91, passed March 25, 1861 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;