DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6459880
title: Sensitivity experiment data using the CHASER chemical transport model for investigation of lower-tropospheric spring ozone enhancement over Hanoi

description: This is the data from the numerical model experiment for investigating the relative importance of different emission source regions on the spring ozone enhancement in the lower troposphere over Hanoi, Vietnam. The details of the investigation are written in the paper by Ogino et al. (2022, Journal of Geophysical Research, Atmosphere, in revision). <strong>Experiment description</strong> We performed sensitivity experiments using the global chemical-transport model, CHASER (Sudo et al., 2002) with T42 horizontal resolution (approximately 2.8 degrees longitude × 2.8 degrees latitude) and 32 vertical layers from the surface up to 10 hPa in sigma coordinate. The two-hourly model outputs interpolated onto the constant pressure levels at 1000, 990, 970, 930, 870, 790, 700, 610, 530, 460, 400, 350, 300, 260, 230, 200, 176, 153, 133, 116, and 100 hPa were used in this study. Note that the updated model, MIROC-Chem (Miyazaki et al., 2017; Watanabe et al., 2011), includes more detailed chemical processes for both troposphere and stratosphere. Nevertheless, CHASER already includes the most important chemical processes in the NOx-CO-Ozone reactions and can be used to evaluate the impact of NOx emissions on ozone productions. In addition, the simulated ozone performance, as well as ozone response to NOx emissions, are comparable between CHASER and MIROC-Chem (Miyazaki et al., 2020). Thus, the results should not be sensitive to the choice of model. The surface emissions of major ozone precursors, such as carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxide (NOx), and nonmethane hydrocarbons, were included in the model based on the published emission inventories (the Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) version 4.2 (EC-JRC/PBL, 2011), the monthly Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED) version 3.1 (van der Werf et al., 2010), and monthly mean Global Emissions Inventory Activity (GEIA) (Graedel et al., 1993)). We employed daily NOx and CO emissions that were optimized using the assimilation of satellite NO2 and CO measurements, where the a priori emissions were constructed based upon bottom-up emission inventories (Miyazaki et al., 2015; 2017). These emissions, including both anthropogenic and biomass burning components, used were obtained from the Tropospheric Chemistry Reanalysis version 1 (TCR-1, Miyazaki et al., 2015) and enabled us to evaluate the emission impacts for individual sources. In the sensitivity experiments, we eliminated the emissions of ozone precursors from the following three source regions: the Indian subcontinent, the northern Indochina Peninsula, and southern China. We conducted spin-up calculations with the optimized emissions for all regions (i.e., standard emissions) from January 1st to the end of February in each year for 10 years from 2005 to 2014. Then, we performed four types of experiments from March 1st to 21st: the control experiment with the standard emissions, and the three sensitivity experiments with the elimination of emission from the above-mentioned three regions, namely the Indian subcontinent, the northern Indochina, the southern China experiments. Because of the non-linear chemistry, the cumulative response from the sensitivity calculations can be different from the total ozone response in the control simulation to some extent as shown by the HTAP modeling works (Turnock et al., 2018; Wild et al., 2012). Nevertheless, they provided important information on the relative contributions of emission sources from different regions. The results of the sensitivity experiments will be compared with the control experiment to investigate the relative contributions of individual emission sources to the ozone enhancement over Hanoi. <strong>Files</strong> O3_Fullyear_[YYYY].nc: The 2-hourly data of ozone mixing ratio obtained in the control experiment from January 1 to December 31 in year [YYYY] from 2005 to 2014. [Param]_March_[YYYY].nc: The 2-hourly data obtained in the sensitivity experiment from Mar 1 to 21 in every year [YYYY] from 2005 to 2014. [Param] is one of the following: O3_Control: Ozone mixing ratio in the control experiment O3_IndianSubcontinent: Ozone mixing ratio in the Indian Subcontinent experiment O3_NorthernIndochina: Ozone mixing ratio in the northern Indochina experiment O3_SouthernChina: Ozone mixing ratio in the southern China experiment CO: Carbon monoxide T: Temperature U: Zonal wind CO_Emission.nc and NOx_Emission.nc: The monthly mean CO and NOx emissions from the surface used in the model experiments. <strong>Contact</strong> Shin-Ya Ogino<br> Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC)<br> E-mail: ogino-sy@jamstec.go.jp
description: This work was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP16K00535.
description: {"references": ["EC-JRC/PBL \u2013 European Commission, Joint Research Centre/Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency PBL (2011). Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR), Release Version 4.2. Retrieved from http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/", "Graedel, T. E., Bates, T. S., Bouwman, A. F., Cunnold, D., Dignon, J., Fung, I., et al. (1993). A compilation of inventories of emissions to the atmosphere. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 7(1), 1\u201326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/92GB02793", "Miyazaki, K., Eskes, H. J., & Sudo, K. (2015). A tropospheric chemistry reanalysis for the years 2005\u20132012 based on an assimilation of OMI, MLS, TES, and MOPITT satellite data. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15(14), 8315\u20138348. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8315-2015", "Miyazaki, K., Eskes, H., Sudo, K., Folkert Boersma, K., Bowman, K., & Kanaya, Y. (2017). Decadal changes in global surface NOx emissions from multi-constituent satellite data assimilation. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 17(2), 807\u2013837. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-807-2017", "Miyazaki, K., Bowman, W. K., Yumimoto, K., Walker, T., & Sudo, K. (2020). Evaluation of a multi-model, multi-constituent assimilation framework for tropospheric chemical reanalysis. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20(2), 931\u2013967. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-931-2020", "Sudo, K., Takahashi, M., Kurokawa, J., & Akimoto, H. (2002). CHASER\u202f: A global chemical model of the troposphere 1 . Model description. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107(D17), 4339. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001113", "Turnock, S. T., Wild, O., Dentener, F. J., Davila, Y., Emmons, L. K., Flemming, J., et al. (2018). The impact of future emission policies on tropospheric ozone using a parameterised approach. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18(12), 8953\u20138978. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8953-2018", "Watanabe, S., Hajima, T., Sudo, K., Nagashima, T., Takemura, T., Okajima, H., et al. (2011). MIROC-ESM 2010: Model description and basic results of CMIP5-20c3m experiments. Geoscientific Model Development, 4(4), 845\u2013872. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-845-2011", "van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., Collatz, G. J., Mu, M., Kasibhatla, P. S., et al. (2010). Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997-2009). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10(23), 11707\u201311735. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010", "Wild, O., Fiore, A. M., Shindell, D. T., Doherty, R. M., Collins, W. J., Dentener, F. J., et al. (2012). Modelling future changes in surface ozone: A parameterized approach. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 12(4), 2037\u20132054. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2037-2012"]}