cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25421128
title: Paper Artifacts

description: <i>Abstract</i>—<i>Context:</i> Modern open-source operating systems consist of numerous independent packages crafted by countless developers worldwide. To effectively manage this diverse array of software originating from various entities, Linux distributions have devised package management tools to streamline the pro- cess. Despite offering convenience in software installation, systems like Ubuntu’s apt may obscure the health of the upstream source. <i>Objective:</i> Employing the libyears software metric established by the CHOASS project, we aim to assess the holistic health of one of the leading Linux distributions at the package level and in its upstream source. Simplifying and making metrics easily applicable is a pivotal goal in the software engineering community. Here, we demonstrate the application of the libyears metric to a heterogeneous package management system. <i>Method:</i> We classified the package version data, then applied the libyears method in a two-pronged approach. First, we derived a novel approach to derive the libyears from the version number itself, and then we calculated the libyears using the upstream date of the source of the package date. <i>Results:</i> Our approach to calculating the libyears directly from the version number as well as our work to classify the different types of version numbering schemes shows that it can help indicate the freshness of a project. However, the extensive manual effort required to produce a libyears value, for even a minimal subset of core packages, limits its usefulness as a metric for evaluating overall distribution health. This result led directly to the development of Package Version Activity Classifier (PVAC), a novel method for systematically assessing the staleness of packages across multiple distribution releases. <i>Conclusions:</i> We present a novel way to systematically evaluate the health of projects with heterogeneous package management systems, such as Ubuntu, by examining staleness of its packages. The PVAC method we propose examines extends previous work by the software engineering research community by identifying packages with little to no development activity in the version of packages included within a distribution release.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25421128.v1
title: Paper Artifacts

description: <i>Abstract</i>—<i>Context:</i> Modern open-source operating systems consist of numerous independent packages crafted by countless developers worldwide. To effectively manage this diverse array of software originating from various entities, Linux distributions have devised package management tools to streamline the pro- cess. Despite offering convenience in software installation, systems like Ubuntu’s apt may obscure the health of the upstream source. <i>Objective:</i> Employing the libyears software metric established by the CHOASS project, we aim to assess the holistic health of one of the leading Linux distributions at the package level and in its upstream source. Simplifying and making metrics easily applicable is a pivotal goal in the software engineering community. Here, we demonstrate the application of the libyears metric to a heterogeneous package management system. <i>Method:</i> We classified the package version data, then applied the libyears method in a two-pronged approach. First, we derived a novel approach to derive the libyears from the version number itself, and then we calculated the libyears using the upstream date of the source of the package date. <i>Results:</i> Our approach to calculating the libyears directly from the version number as well as our work to classify the different types of version numbering schemes shows that it can help indicate the freshness of a project. However, the extensive manual effort required to produce a libyears value, for even a minimal subset of core packages, limits its usefulness as a metric for evaluating overall distribution health. This result lead directly to the development of Package Version Activity Classifier (PVAC), a novel method for systematically assessing the staleness of packages across multiple distribution releases. <i>Conclusions:</i> We present a novel way to systematically evaluate the health of projects with heterogeneous package management systems, such as Ubuntu, by examining staleness of its packages. The PVAC method we propose examines extends previous work by the software engineering research community by identifying packages with little to no development activity in the version of packages included within a distribution release.
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2jkvsr
title: CCDC 2340865: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Min Wang, Wenhao Sun, Kun Zhang, Zhonghua Zhang, Aobing Du, Shanmu Dong, Jinlei Zhang, Jing Liu, Xi Chen, Zhenfang Zhou, Fujun Li, Zhenjiang Li, Guicun Li, Guanglei Cui|2024|Energy Environ.Sci.|17|630|doi:10.1039/D3EE02450D
description: An entry from the Cambridge Structural Database, the world’s repository for small molecule crystal structures. The entry contains experimental data from a crystal diffraction study. The deposited dataset for this entry is freely available from the CCDC and typically includes 3D coordinates, cell parameters, space group, experimental conditions and quality measures.
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2jnk1t
title: CCDC 2343446: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Le Ye|2024|CSD Communication|||
description: An entry from the Cambridge Structural Database, the world’s repository for small molecule crystal structures. The entry contains experimental data from a crystal diffraction study. The deposited dataset for this entry is freely available from the CCDC and typically includes 3D coordinates, cell parameters, space group, experimental conditions and quality measures.
DOI: 10.34934/dvn/vxqofz
title: Transcripts of in-depth interviews: "From moral distress to resilient ethical climate among general practitioners: fostering awareness. A qualitative pilot study."

description: Raw data (transcripts of in-depth interviews) from qualitative research study "From moral distress to resilient ethical climate among general practitioners: fostering awareness. A qualitative pilot study."
DOI: 10.15151/esrf-es-1580762101
title: Inhouse Research Florian

description: Tomography scans on bulk composite wires of steel-LaFeSiMn and Al2O3 single crystal rods
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10806502
title: test

description: test
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10806503
title: test

description: test
DOI: 10.6073/pasta/40db896daf6bea5355a1ddca25d0da4a
title: University of Houston Coastal Center soil carbon stocks in 2022

description: This study sampled plant community composition and soil carbon stocks at two native prairie sites in the Houston metropolitan area. Some of the samples were taken in areas that had been invaded by forest, and in some cases treated to remove invasive species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25483846
title: Table1_RawValues.csv

description: Raw values from experiment
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25483846.v1
title: Table1_RawValues.csv

description: Raw values from experiment
DOI: 10.18739/a22v2cc14
title: Dissolved iron-binding organic ligand characteristics from the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) project, Utqiaġvik, Alaska, 2021

description: This dataset includes the concentrations and conditional stability constants of iron-binding organic ligands in samples collected during an extension study of the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) project and measured by competitive ligand exchange-adsorptive cathodic stripping voltammetry (CLE-AdCSV). 
 These samples originated from a spring melt field campaign conducted in Utqiaġvik, Alaska. This campaign was designed when the MOSAiC expedition could no longer accommodate spring melt trace metal work. The melt season was a key period of our effort during MOSAiC and necessary for addressing our proposed hypotheses. Using facilities in Utqiaġvik hosted by Ukpeaǵvik Iñupiat Corporation (UIC), we studied sea ice processes during the spring melt cycle from April – June of 2021. Four UAF Scientists participated in the field campaign. During that time, sea ice, snow and water samples were obtained from homogenous, flat, landfast ice at high (2-3 times a week) temporal resolution.
DOI: 10.22002/yeazy-5c026
title: Dataset: Pavement ant extract is a chemotaxis repellent for C. elegans

description: gcms alkane control
DOI: 10.22002/vb73p-3gw37
title: Dataset: Pavement ant extract is a chemotaxis repellent for C. elegans

description: gcms blank control
DOI: 10.22002/1nx1x-8jp79
title: Dataset: Pavement ant extract is a chemotaxis repellent for C. elegans

description: pavement ant extract gcms
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10806727
title: TR frequency distributions and TR disparity scores

description: TR frequency distributions and TR disparity scores
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10806728
title: TR frequency distributions and TR disparity scores

description: TR frequency distributions and TR disparity scores
DOI: 10.26179/84ge-rm89
title: Aurora Australis Voyage 2 2015/16 Track and Underway Data
DOI: 10.26179/atb6-wr44
title: Aurora Australis Voyage 3 2015/16 Track and Underway Data
DOI: 10.26179/v20a-rr11
title: Aurora Australis Voyage 1 2016/17 Track and Underway Data
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25483858.v1
title: Instagram Curated Flows

description: Survey data and associated files about a variety of Instagram uses, algorithm awareness, political interest and demographic variables. The survey was conducted in four countries (United States, Canada, France, and the United Kingdom) in October and November 2019. The data file only includes Instagram users.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25483858
title: Instagram Curated Flows

description: Survey data and associated files about a variety of Instagram uses, algorithm awareness, political interest and demographic variables. The survey was conducted in four countries (United States, Canada, France, and the United Kingdom) in October and November 2019. The data file only includes Instagram users.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10884309
title: Base de Dados 2 - Puerperas

description: Base de dados com dados de puerperas da região Norte do Brasil com SRAG de acordo com o openDataSUS.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10884310
title: Base de Dados 2 - Puerperas

description: Base de dados com dados de puerperas da região Norte do Brasil com SRAG de acordo com o openDataSUS.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10884313
title: Base de Dados 3 - Gestantes

description: Base de dados com dados de gestantes da região Norte do Brasil com SRAG de acordo com o openDataSUS.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10884314
title: Base de Dados 3 - Gestantes

description: Base de dados com dados de gestantes da região Norte do Brasil com SRAG de acordo com o openDataSUS.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25476112
title: Does insecticide resistance expand the host range potential of the aphid <i>Myzus p</i><i>ersicae?</i> - Data

description: <b>All Comparisons of Differentially Expressed Genes</b> - excel sheet containing the annotations and fold change values of the all the differentially expressed genes between the different clone comparisons<b>Final List of Common Genes</b> - excel sheet containing the list of genes that were commonly differentially expressed between all the aphid clone comparisons. Also contains table and bar chart presenting the number of times each candidate gene selected from previous literature was found in each aphid clone comparison.<b>Non-direct and Direct Competition </b>- excel sheet containing number of nymphs produced by all 6 clones on the 3 host plants in the non-direct competition, and the number of nymphs produced by the two clones NS and Viola in the direct competition experiment.<b>sterror</b> - excel sheet containing the means and standard error values of the 6 grouped resistant and susceptible clones in the non-direct competition experiment, used to make the bar plot for the non-direct competition experiment.<b>sterror2</b> - excel sheet containing the means and standard error values of the resistant clone Viola and susceptible clone NS in the direct competition experiment, used to make the bar plot for the direct competition experiment.<b>cabbagettest </b>- excel sheet containing the number of nymphs produce by the 6 grouped resistant and susceptible clones on the 3 host plants, used to conduct the unpaired t tests to compare the reproductive performance of resistant and susceptible clones on the 3 different host plants when in not in competition<b>directcompetition</b> - excel sheet containing the number of nymphs produce by the resistant clone Viola and susceptible clone NS on the 3 host plants, used to conduct the unpaired t tests comparing the reproductive performance of resistant and susceptible clones on the 3 different host plants when in direct competitionAPHID HOST SHIFT DISS <b>Rscript</b> - R script containing all my statistical tests: unpaired t tests of resistant and susceptible clones on the 3 host plants when in direct and non direct competition, and kruskal Wallis tests and post hoc Dunns test to identify significant differences between individual and resistant and susceptible clones on the different host plants. Also contains all my code for my bar charts for the non-direct and direct competition experiments and the code for my box plots showing the significant differences between individual clones and resistant and susceptible clones on the different host plants.Up and Down-regulated Genes Graph - excel sheet containing the number of and and down regulated genes in each aphid clone comparison and the bar graph generated from this data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25476112.v2
title: Does insecticide resistance expand the host range potential of the aphid <i>Myzus p</i><i>ersicae?</i> - Data

description: <b>All Comparisons of Differentially Expressed Genes</b> - excel sheet containing the annotations and fold change values of the all the differentially expressed genes between the different clone comparisons<b>Final List of Common Genes</b> - excel sheet containing the list of genes that were commonly differentially expressed between all the aphid clone comparisons. Also contains table and bar chart presenting the number of times each candidate gene selected from previous literature was found in each aphid clone comparison.<b>Non-direct and Direct Competition </b>- excel sheet containing number of nymphs produced by all 6 clones on the 3 host plants in the non-direct competition, and the number of nymphs produced by the two clones NS and Viola in the direct competition experiment.<b>sterror</b> - excel sheet containing the means and standard error values of the 6 grouped resistant and susceptible clones in the non-direct competition experiment, used to make the bar plot for the non-direct competition experiment.<b>sterror2</b> - excel sheet containing the means and standard error values of the resistant clone Viola and susceptible clone NS in the direct competition experiment, used to make the bar plot for the direct competition experiment.<b>cabbagettest </b>- excel sheet containing the number of nymphs produce by the 6 grouped resistant and susceptible clones on the 3 host plants, used to conduct the unpaired t tests to compare the reproductive performance of resistant and susceptible clones on the 3 different host plants when in not in competition<b>directcompetition</b> - excel sheet containing the number of nymphs produce by the resistant clone Viola and susceptible clone NS on the 3 host plants, used to conduct the unpaired t tests comparing the reproductive performance of resistant and susceptible clones on the 3 different host plants when in direct competitionAPHID HOST SHIFT DISS <b>Rscript</b> - R script containing all my statistical tests: unpaired t tests of resistant and susceptible clones on the 3 host plants when in direct and non direct competition, and kruskal Wallis tests and post hoc Dunns test to identify significant differences between individual and resistant and susceptible clones on the different host plants. Also contains all my code for my bar charts for the non-direct and direct competition experiments and the code for my box plots showing the significant differences between individual clones and resistant and susceptible clones on the different host plants.Up and Down-regulated Genes Graph - excel sheet containing the number of and and down regulated genes in each aphid clone comparison and the bar graph generated from this data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25476112.v1
title: Does insecticide resistance expand the host range potential of the aphid <i>Myzus p</i><i>ersicae?</i> - Data

description: <b>All Comparisons of Differentially Expressed Genes</b> - excel sheet containing the annotations and fold change values of the all the differentially expressed genes between the different clone comparisons<b>Final List of Common Genes</b> - excel sheet containing the list of genes that were commonly differentially expressed between all the aphid clone comparisons. Also contains table and bar chart presenting the number of times each candidate gene selected from previous literature was found in each aphid clone comparison.<b>Non-direct and Direct Competition </b>- excel sheet containing number of nymphs produced by all 6 clones on the 3 host plants in the non-direct competition, and the number of nymphs produced by the two clones NS and Viola in the direct competition experiment.<b>sterror</b> - excel sheet containing the means and standard error values of the 6 grouped resistant and susceptible clones in the non-direct competition experiment, used to make the bar plot for the non-direct competition experiment.<b>sterror2</b> - excel sheet containing the means and standard error values of the resistant clone Viola and susceptible clone NS in the direct competition experiment, used to make the bar plot for the direct competition experiment.<b>cabbagettest </b>- excel sheet containing the number of nymphs produce by the 6 grouped resistant and susceptible clones on the 3 host plants, used to conduct the unpaired t tests to compare the reproductive performance of resistant and susceptible clones on the 3 different host plants when in not in competition<b>directcompetition</b> - excel sheet containing the number of nymphs produce by the resistant clone Viola and susceptible clone NS on the 3 host plants, used to conduct the unpaired t tests comparing the reproductive performance of resistant and susceptible clones on the 3 different host plants when in direct competitionAPHID HOST SHIFT DISS <b>Rscript</b> - R script containing all my statistical tests: unpaired t tests of resistant and susceptible clones on the 3 host plants when in direct and non direct competition, and kruskal Wallis tests and post hoc Dunns test to identify significant differences between individual and resistant and susceptible clones on the different host plants. Also contains all my code for my bar charts for the non-direct and direct competition experiments and the code for my box plots showing the significant differences between individual clones and resistant and susceptible clones on the different host plants.<br>
DOI: 10.15468/dl.pfkxem
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 627537 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "TaxonKey" : [
 "is one of (Aetobatus narinari (Euphrasen, 1790), Akawaio penak Maldonado-Ocampo, López-Fernández, Taphorn, Bernard, Crampton & Lovejoy, 2013, Anguilla rostrata (Lesueur, 1817), Balaenoptera borealis Lesson, 1828, Balaenoptera musculus (Linnaeus, 1758), Carcharhinus acronotus (Poey, 1860), Carcharhinus longimanus (Poey, 1861), Carcharhinus obscurus (Lesueur, 1818), Carcharhinus perezii (Poey, 1876), Carcharhinus plumbeus (Nardo, 1827), Carcharhinus porosus (Ranzani, 1839), Carcharhinus signatus (Poey, 1868), Centrophorus uyato (Rafinesque, 1810), Cetorhinus maximus (Gunnerus, 1765), Chelonia mydas (Linnaeus, 1758), Epinephelus striatus (Bloch, 1792), Eretmochelys imbricata (Linnaeus, 1766), Fontitrygon geijskesi (Boeseman, 1948), Isogomphodon oxyrhynchus (Müller & Henle, 1839), Isurus oxyrinchus Rafinesque, 1810, Isurus paucus Guitart, 1966, Lopholatilus chamaeleonticeps Goode & Bean, 1879, Mobula birostris (Walbaum, 1792), Mobula hypostoma (Bancroft, 1831), Mobula mobular (Bonnaterre, 1788), Mobula tarapacana (Philippi, 1892), Mobula thurstoni (Lloyd, 1908), Mustelus higmani Springer & Lowe, 1963, Pristis pectinata Latham, 1794, Pristis pristis (Linnaeus, 1758), Pseudobatos percellens (Walbaum, 1792), Pterodroma hasitata (Kuhl, 1820), Pteronura brasiliensis Zimmermann, 1780, Rhincodon typus Smith, 1828, Siderastrea siderea (Ellis & Solander, 1786), Sphyrna lewini (Griffith & Smith, 1834), Sphyrna media Springer, 1940, Sphyrna mokarran (Rüppell, 1837), Sphyrna tiburo (Linnaeus, 1758), Sphyrna tudes (Valenciennes, 1822), Sporophila maximiliani (Cabanis, 1851), Styracura schmardae (Werner, 1904), Swartzia jenmanii Sandwith, Urotrygon microphthalmum Delsman, 1941)"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 627537 records from 1524 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0038994-240321170329656/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.5sk3ba
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 38626 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "TaxonKey is Mustela putorius Linnaeus, 1758",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "Year is greater than or equal to 2011",
 "Year is less than or equal to 2024"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 38626 records from 621 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0078670-240626123714530/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.gxzs39
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 715249 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 {
 "and" : [
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 {
 "not" : {
 "BasisOfRecord" : [
 "is one of (Fossil, Living Specimen)"
 ]
 }
 }
 ]
 },
 "SpeciesKey is Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758",
 "Year is greater than or equal to 2004",
 "Year is less than or equal to 2023"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 715249 records from 1429 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0078665-240626123714530/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.17876/plate/dr.4/plates/208_94894
title: Digital object identifier (DOI) for the plate 94894 in archive 208 from the APPLAUSE DR4
DOI: 10.17876/plate/dr.4/plates/208_94895
title: Digital object identifier (DOI) for the plate 94895 in archive 208 from the APPLAUSE DR4
DOI: 10.17876/plate/dr.4/plates/208_94896
title: Digital object identifier (DOI) for the plate 94896 in archive 208 from the APPLAUSE DR4
DOI: 10.17876/plate/dr.4/plates/208_94897
title: Digital object identifier (DOI) for the plate 94897 in archive 208 from the APPLAUSE DR4
DOI: 10.17876/plate/dr.4/plates/208_94898
title: Digital object identifier (DOI) for the plate 94898 in archive 208 from the APPLAUSE DR4
DOI: 10.17876/plate/dr.4/plates/208_94899
title: Digital object identifier (DOI) for the plate 94899 in archive 208 from the APPLAUSE DR4
DOI: 10.17876/plate/dr.4/plates/208_94900
title: Digital object identifier (DOI) for the plate 94900 in archive 208 from the APPLAUSE DR4
DOI: 10.17876/plate/dr.4/plates/208_94901
title: Digital object identifier (DOI) for the plate 94901 in archive 208 from the APPLAUSE DR4
DOI: 10.17876/plate/dr.4/plates/208_94902
title: Digital object identifier (DOI) for the plate 94902 in archive 208 from the APPLAUSE DR4
DOI: 10.17876/plate/dr.4/plates/208_94903
title: Digital object identifier (DOI) for the plate 94903 in archive 208 from the APPLAUSE DR4
DOI: 10.17876/plate/dr.4/plates/208_94904
title: Digital object identifier (DOI) for the plate 94904 in archive 208 from the APPLAUSE DR4