DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25599591.v1
title: Long Covid Risk

description: Feature preparation Preprocessing was applied to the data, such as creating dummy variables and performing transformations (centering, scaling, YeoJohnson) using the preProcess() function from the “caret” package in R. The correlation among the variables was examined and no serious multicollinearity problems were found. A stepwise variable selection was performed using a logistic regression model. The final set of variables included: Demographic: age, body mass index, sex, ethnicity, smoking History of disease: heart disease, migraine, insomnia, gastrointestinal disease, COVID-19 history: covid vaccination, rashes, conjunctivitis, shortness of breath, chest pain, cough, runny nose, dysgeusia, muscle and joint pain, fatigue, fever ,COVID-19 reinfection, and ICU admission. These variables were used to train and test various machine-learning models Model selection and training The data was randomly split into 80% training and 20% testing subsets. The “h2o” package in R version 4.3.1 was employed to implement different algorithms. AutoML was first used, which automatically explored a range of models with different configurations. Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), Random Forest (RF), and Regularized Generalized Linear Model (GLM) were identified as the best-performing models on our data and their parameters were fine-tuned. An ensemble method that stacked different models together was also used, as it could sometimes improve the accuracy. The models were evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and C-statistics as diagnostic measures. The model with the highest AUC was selected for further analysis using the confusion matrix, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 and F2 scores. The optimal prediction threshold was determined by plotting the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy and choosing the point of intersection as it balanced the trade-off between the three metrics. The model’s predictions were also plotted, and the quantile ranges were used to classify the model’s prediction as follows: &gt; 1st quantile, &gt; 2nd quantile, &gt; 3rd quartile and &lt; 3rd quartile (very low, low, moderate, high) respectively. Metric Formula C-statistics (TPR + TNR - 1) / 2 Sensitivity/Recall TP / (TP + FN) Specificity TN / (TN + FP) Accuracy (TP + TN) / (TP + TN + FP + FN) F1 score 2 * (precision * recall) / (precision + recall) Model interpretation We used the variable importance plot, which is a measure of how much each variable contributes to the prediction power of a machine learning model. In H2O package, variable importance for GBM and RF is calculated by measuring the decrease in the model's error when a variable is split on. The more a variable's split decreases the error, the more important that variable is considered to be. The error is calculated using the following formula: 𝑆𝐸=𝑀𝑆𝐸∗𝑁=𝑉𝐴𝑅∗𝑁 and then it is scaled between 0 and 1 and plotted. Also, we used The SHAP summary plot which is a graphical tool to visualize the impact of input features on the prediction of a machine learning model. SHAP stands for SHapley Additive exPlanations, a method to calculate the contribution of each feature to the prediction by averaging over all possible subsets of features [28]. SHAP summary plot shows the distribution of the SHAP values for each feature across the data instances. We use the h2o.shap_summary_plot() function in R to generate the SHAP summary plot for our GBM model. We pass the model object and the test data as arguments, and optionally specify the columns (features) we want to include in the plot. The plot shows the SHAP values for each feature on the x-axis, and the features on the y-axis. The color indicates whether the feature value is low (blue) or high (red). The plot also shows the distribution of the feature values as a density plot on the right.