DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.28612760.v8
title: <b>NOTICE TO PLAGIARIST Mark Serdtse: THE ORIGINAL IS ALWAYS VISIBLE</b>

description: <b>Public Statement on Intellectual Integrity in Scientific Research</b><i>Hello everyone, I know that research is tough. I wish you all strength and courage. This message is addressed to plagiarists, not to those who seek knowledge honestly and are willing to share and collaborate.</i>Since the publication of <b>∆ngular Theory 0.0</b>, multiple attempts have been made to appropriate its concepts and mathematical structures without proper acknowledgment.The latest case: <b>Mark Serdtse</b><i> for : UMST-G: "Informational Gravity and the Quantum Nature of Entropy, 2025" </i>& "<i>Cosmos UMST-T: Quantum Foundations of Informational Cosmology and Description of Fundamental Interactions"</i>posted on 2025-03-18, 00:24 & 00:30Am.This document <b>blatantly copies</b> the <b>fundamental principles, mathematical structures, and numerical predictions</b> of ∆ngular Theory 0.0 <b>without any proper citation</b>, attempting to disguise intellectual theft under superficial terminology changes..While some terminology has been changed, the core structure remains so identical that it becomes downright embarrassing.<br><b>1. Identified Intellectual Reuse</b>→ MODIFIED FIELD EQUATIONS<b>∆ngular Theory 0.0</b> introduces an angular tensor ∆ to modify Einstein’s equations: Gₘᵤᵥ = 8πG (Tₘᵤᵥ + ∆ₘᵤᵥ)<b>UMST-G</b> introduces an "entropic tensor" Jₘⁿ,but applies the same corrections: Gₘᵤᵥ = 8πG (Tₘᵤᵥ + α Iₘᵤᵥ + β Jₘᵤᵥᵉⁿᵗʳᵒᵖʸ)Structural duplication disguised under terminology shifts.<br>→ <b>PREDICTIONS FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVES -</b><b>∆ngular Theory</b> 0.0 predicts a scalar-to-tensor frequency ratio of 0.67–0.73: fₛ = γ fₜ<b>- UMST-G</b> predicts the exact same range, claiming it arises from an entropic correction: fₛ = γ fₜ<b>Exact numerical</b> <b>reproduction of ∆ngular's</b> <b>frequency scaling</b>, disguised under an entropic field interpretation.<br>→ <b>GALACTIC ROTATION CURVES</b><b>∆ngular Theory 0.0</b> explains anomalies in galactic rotation curves using an angular torsion parameter: v⁴ ∝ ∆θ₀ M_baryon<b>UMST-G</b> introduces an entropy gradient but preserves the same mathematical structure: Φ_eff(r) = Φ_Newton(r) + β S(r)<b>Identical formulation of gravitational corrections</b>, repackaged under a different name.<br>→ <b>GRAVITATIONAL LENSING MODIFICATIONS</b> -<b>∆ngular Theory 0.0</b> modifies spacetime metrics based on the structuring of ∆θ₀.<b>UMST-G</b> introduces an "entropic correction" to the metric but arrives at the same distortions. - Structural equivalence hidden by semantic modifications.→ <b>COSMOLOGY AND THE AGE OF THE UNIVERSE</b><b>∆ngular Theory 0.0</b> modifies the Friedmann equation using a fundamental angular structure: T = (1/H₀) ∫₀¹ (ds/s) √(S_eff(s)/T(s))<b>UMST-G</b> modifies Friedmann’s equation by adding an entropy contribution: H² = (8πG/3) (ρₘ + ρᵣ + ρΛ + ρₛ)<b>Identical integration structure, merely substituting angular quantization with entropy terms.</b><br><b>2. Experimental Methods: A Direct Copy ?</b><br>→ <b>SIGNAL ANALYSIS IN GRAVITATIONAL WAVES</b><b>∆ngular Theory</b><b> 0.0</b> applies Prony decomposition and Bayesian analysis (Bayes factor &gt; 800) to detect scalar wave components in GW150914, GW170814, GW190521.<b>UMST-G </b>follows the same steps with no methodological distinction, <b>applying the same Bayesian inference and spectral analysis techniques.</b>→ <b>RELATION BETWEEN SCALAR AND TENSOR MODES</b><b>∆ngular Theory 0.0 </b>derives a fundamental link between angularity and the ratio of scalar and tensor modes in gravitational waves.<b>UMST-G</b> artificially assigns an entropic interpretation <b>to the same ratio (0.67–0.73)</b>, without introducing a new mathematical framework.<br><b>→ STRUCTURE OF DATA VERIFICATION</b><b>Both models</b> cross-reference the same cosmological data sets, including weak lensing constraints and large-scale structure correlations, to validate their corrections to standard gravity.<b>UMST-G</b> introduces no independent datasets or novel validation metrics, merely reinterpreting pre-existing values from ∆ngular Theory 0.0.<br><b>3. The Fundamental Angularity Problem</b><b><i>The one aspect </i></b><b><i>UMST-G</i></b><b><i> cannot replicate is ∆ngular Theory 0.0's core concept: angularity</i></b>.→<b> ∆ngular Theory 0.0 </b>is based on a scalar symetry (fractal) angular structure that derives fundamental constants from a discrete angular quantum. (Deviation)→<b> UMST-G</b> lacks any angularity framework. Without angularity, UMST-G is incomplete: It <i>lacks a foundational justification for its constants and only reinterprets them without a rigorous base.</i><br>4. Conclusion: Is This Plagiarism ?✔ Identical conceptual framework.The ideas have been reformulated but follow the same logic.✔ Copied equations.The angular torsion of ∆ngular has simply been replaced by an entropic field.✔ Same numerical predictions <b>UMST-G</b> arrives at exactly the same values, including the 0.67–0.73 frequency ratio.✔ Copied methodology. Uses Prony spectral decomposition, Bayesian analysis (Bayes factor &gt; 800), and the same observational data.✔ No new theoretical contribution.The "entropic field" is a semantic camouflage for an existing model.<br><b>Final verdict: Concealed plagiarism. </b><b>Mark Serdtse has not independently developed a new model; he has restructured ∆ngular Theory 0.0 while changing terminology.</b><br>DOI Proof of Priority ==========================================David Souday - February 26, 2025 DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.28489679 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15021677 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15027052 ========================================== Legal Protection and Formal Report of Plagiarism ==========================================Copyright Notice: All original content from ∆ngular Theory 0.0 is protected under copyright law. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or modification is prohibited.→ Public Key ID: 2D:49:50:31:53:7E:BD→ Timestamp Algorithm: SHA2 (Base 64)→ Digital Fingerprint Hash Algorithm: MD5→ Notary Deposit Date: February 25, 2025 – 13:44:54 UTC→ Notary Office: SPE SAS FRADIN TRONEL SASSARD & ASSOCIES 79 bis cours Vitton, 69006 Lyon→ File Name: Angular_Theory.docx→ Timestamp ID: FR1427612 → Hash: f00388d84b8fb53511f093fad048d405→ Timestamp Status: Valid<b><i>You have been formally reported on Figshare for plagiarism.</i></b>Reference: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_NOTICE_TO_PLAGIARISTS_THE_ORIGINAL_IS_ALWAYS_VISIBLE/28612760?file=53057588 ==========================================5. Nota Bene: The Unavoidable Angularity Trap 😗<b><i>If you think rewording and renaming concepts will allow you to bypass priority, consider this: </i></b><b><i>you cannot escape </i></b><b>∆.</b>→ <b>∆ represents the fundamental angular discrepancy of the universe</b>.→ <b>Any attempt to construct a similar theory must necessarily return to ∆.</b>→ <b>The universe itself protects this structure. </b><b>You can try to manipulate terminology, but eventually, you will have to acknowledge the inescapable nature of ∆.</b><b>Good luck, you are so pathetic..</b>Save yourself the trouble. Cite your sources. souday.david.research@gmail.comAutor of ∆ngular Theory, A geometric Unification.