cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552903
title: Appendix B. Details on fruiting neighborhoods and dispersed seeds for focal plants.

description: Details on fruiting neighborhoods and dispersed seeds for focal plants.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552900
title: Appendix C. Details on the mass spectrometry analysis and Bayesian mixture model for dispersed seeds.

description: Details on the mass spectrometry analysis and Bayesian mixture model for dispersed seeds.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552903.v1
title: Appendix B. Details on fruiting neighborhoods and dispersed seeds for focal plants.

description: Details on fruiting neighborhoods and dispersed seeds for focal plants.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552900.v1
title: Appendix C. Details on the mass spectrometry analysis and Bayesian mixture model for dispersed seeds.

description: Details on the mass spectrometry analysis and Bayesian mixture model for dispersed seeds.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552897
title: Supplement 1. R and WinBUGS code for the mixture model.

description: File List Rscript.r (md5: d73ea6d5356773558ec3152dad6d5517)<br> Posteriors.csv (md5: 8c2fec2da85cfaed5a6bee8a6e8703ef) Description Rscript.r is a text file that contains R and WinBUGS code for the δ<sup>15</sup>N(‰) mixture model. Posteriors.csv consists of posterior estimates for number of <sup>15</sup>N-labelled seeds in batches of dispersed seeds mapped within the 10-m radius or collected within the 10 to 20-m quarters. Column id holds the id number for each sample with G indicating group and Q identifying the four cardinal quarters, plant is the identity of the focal plant, and Delta is the isotopic delta. The posterior estimates are the mean, sd and percentiles. Rhat and n.eff correspond to Gelman and Rubin's convergence diagnosis (Rhat = 1 at convergence), and the effective sample size for the posteriors (Gelman and Hill 2007). <br>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552894
title: Appendix A. Site specific information on sample analysis and Sr isotope values.

description: Site specific information on sample analysis and Sr isotope values.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552894.v1
title: Appendix A. Site specific information on sample analysis and Sr isotope values.

description: Site specific information on sample analysis and Sr isotope values.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552891
title: Appendix B. Cluster analysis and source site designation of individual Chinook salmon.

description: Cluster analysis and source site designation of individual Chinook salmon.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552891.v1
title: Appendix B. Cluster analysis and source site designation of individual Chinook salmon.

description: Cluster analysis and source site designation of individual Chinook salmon.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552888
title: Appendix C. Parameter estimates (juvenile movement and sex) for models predicting straying occurrence for adult Chinook salmon.

description: Parameter estimates (juvenile movement and sex) for models predicting straying occurrence for adult Chinook salmon.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552888.v1
title: Appendix C. Parameter estimates (juvenile movement and sex) for models predicting straying occurrence for adult Chinook salmon.

description: Parameter estimates (juvenile movement and sex) for models predicting straying occurrence for adult Chinook salmon.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552885
title: Appendix A. Derivation of explicit estimators.

description: Derivation of explicit estimators.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552885.v1
title: Appendix A. Derivation of explicit estimators.

description: Derivation of explicit estimators.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552882
title: Appendix B. Example illustrating equivalence of survival rate estimates based on full and conditional likelihoods.

description: Example illustrating equivalence of survival rate estimates based on full and conditional likelihoods.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552882.v1
title: Appendix B. Example illustrating equivalence of survival rate estimates based on full and conditional likelihoods.

description: Example illustrating equivalence of survival rate estimates based on full and conditional likelihoods.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552879
title: Supplement 1. Excel spreadsheet with example calculations.

description: File List Supplement1.xls (md5: 4202b5bccb5ee828f646f50530394c47) <i>Please be advised that the ESA cannot guarantee the forward migration of proprietary file formats such as Excel (.xls) documents.</i> Description SupplementA.xls is an Excel spreadsheet containing 5 sheets with example calculations. The first 4 sheets (labeled Model 1 - Model 4) contain calculations for models considered in APPLICATION TO YELLOWSTONE BISON: Model 1: Makes no assumptions about equality of survival rates for different age classes. Model 2: Assumes survival rates are equal for ages 0–1, 2–3, 4–5, 6–7, 8–9, 10–11, 12–13. Model 3: Assumes survival rates are equal for ages 0–1, 2–3, 4–5, 6–11, 12–13. Model 4: Assumes survival rates are equal for ages 0–13. The last sheet (labeled 3 Years) contains calculations for a hypothetical example with 3 age classes and 3 years of data, and no assumptions about equality of survival rates.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552879.v1
title: Supplement 1. Excel spreadsheet with example calculations.

description: File List Supplement1.xls (md5: 4202b5bccb5ee828f646f50530394c47) <i>Please be advised that the ESA cannot guarantee the forward migration of proprietary file formats such as Excel (.xls) documents.</i> Description SupplementA.xls is an Excel spreadsheet containing 5 sheets with example calculations. The first 4 sheets (labeled Model 1 - Model 4) contain calculations for models considered in APPLICATION TO YELLOWSTONE BISON: Model 1: Makes no assumptions about equality of survival rates for different age classes. Model 2: Assumes survival rates are equal for ages 0–1, 2–3, 4–5, 6–7, 8–9, 10–11, 12–13. Model 3: Assumes survival rates are equal for ages 0–1, 2–3, 4–5, 6–11, 12–13. Model 4: Assumes survival rates are equal for ages 0–13. The last sheet (labeled 3 Years) contains calculations for a hypothetical example with 3 age classes and 3 years of data, and no assumptions about equality of survival rates.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552876
title: Appendix A. Photographs of nests of bee species included in the study.

description: Photographs of nests of bee species included in the study.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552873
title: Appendix B. Untransformed species impacts of plants on pollinators vs. interaction frequency in the Villavicencio network.

description: Untransformed species impacts of plants on pollinators vs. interaction frequency in the Villavicencio network.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552870
title: Appendix C. Untransformed values of interaction strengths and impacts of plants on pollinators.

description: Untransformed values of interaction strengths and impacts of plants on pollinators.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552873.v1
title: Appendix B. Untransformed species impacts of plants on pollinators vs. interaction frequency in the Villavicencio network.

description: Untransformed species impacts of plants on pollinators vs. interaction frequency in the Villavicencio network.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552870.v1
title: Appendix C. Untransformed values of interaction strengths and impacts of plants on pollinators.

description: Untransformed values of interaction strengths and impacts of plants on pollinators.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552867
title: Appendix D. The distribution of interaction frequencies in the Villavicencio plant-pollinator network.

description: The distribution of interaction frequencies in the Villavicencio plant-pollinator network.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552864
title: Appendix A. Detailed methods describing greenhouse conditions, sampling procedure, statistical analyses, and references.

description: Detailed methods describing greenhouse conditions, sampling procedure, statistical analyses, and references.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552864.v1
title: Appendix A. Detailed methods describing greenhouse conditions, sampling procedure, statistical analyses, and references.

description: Detailed methods describing greenhouse conditions, sampling procedure, statistical analyses, and references.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552861
title: Appendix B. Figure showing the effects of soil phosphorus and AMF on plant biomass.

description: Figure showing the effects of soil phosphorus and AMF on plant biomass.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552861.v1
title: Appendix B. Figure showing the effects of soil phosphorus and AMF on plant biomass.

description: Figure showing the effects of soil phosphorus and AMF on plant biomass.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552858
title: Appendix A. Citations for all studies used to derive data for meta-analysis.

description: Citations for all studies used to derive data for meta-analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552855
title: Appendix B. List and description of studies that met many, but not all of our inclusion criteria.

description: List and description of studies that met many, but not all of our inclusion criteria.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552852
title: Appendix C. Description of how data were obtained from individual studies.

description: Description of how data were obtained from individual studies.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552849
title: Supplement 1. Richness response, ANPP, and climate data for all studies included in the meta-analysis.

description: File List encroach_div_data.txt (md5: f755284466bd9e2836b9171063d5b016) Description The encroach_div_data.txt file is a tab separate file. It contains the raw data used to calculate "community type" averages of richness response and ANPP. It also includes meta-data about each study included, such as the corresponding citations, study site location, study design, and yearly climate averages (precipitation and temperature). Column descriptions: 1. Community_Type = the name of the community type that the study was categorized as 2. Richness_Cit = the first author name and year for of each site richness data 3. ANPP_Cit = the first author name and year for of each site richness data 4. Location= the location where the study took place, usually a nearby city, wildlife refuge or research station 5. State/Province = U.S. state or Canadian province where the study took place 6. Encroaching_Species: species name of the predominate encroaching species in the study 7. Study_Design = the type of study design used to compare encroached and unencroaced richness ('WvG' denotes a binary comparison between encroached and unencroached treatments in the same year[s] with species richness expressed as the number of species per plot, 'Inven' denotes a binary comparison between encroached and unencroached treatments in the same year[s] with species richness expressed as the total number of species found in unencroached and encroached treatments, 'HC' denotes a binary comparison before and after encroachment occurred in the same plots with species richness expressed as the number of species per plot, 'REG' denotes a comparison of woody cover [%] to species richness in the same year[s] with species richness expressed as the number of species per plot) 8. Latitude = latitude of the study site (decimal degrees) 9. Longitude: longitude of the study site (decimal degrees) 10. MAP = mean annual precipitation at the study site (mm/yr)_ 11. MAT = mean annual temperature of the study site (°C) 12. Richness_Response: richness response (unitless) 13. ANPP_Unencroached = annual aboveground net primary productivity measured in unencroached plots (g/ 14. ANPP_Encroached = annual aboveground net primary productivity measured in encroached plots (g/m<sup>2</sup>) Missing values are represented as "---" Check-sum values are: Column 8 (Latitude): SUM = 1186.73; 0 values missing (rows with data: 30) Column 9 (Longitude): SUM = -31870.377; 0 values missing (rows with data: 30) Column 10 (MAP): SUM = 16652.360; 0 values missing (rows with data: 30) Column 11 (MAT): SUM = 324.211; 0 values missing (rows with data: 30) Column 12 (Richness_response): SUM = -19.494; 0 values missing (rows with data: 30) Column 13 (ANPP_Unencroaced): SUM = 4500.100; 13 values missing (rows with data: 17) Column 14 (ANPP_Encroached): SUM = 13248.200; 12 values missing (rows with data: 18)
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552849.v1
title: Supplement 1. Richness response, ANPP, and climate data for all studies included in the meta-analysis.

description: File List encroach_div_data.txt (md5: f755284466bd9e2836b9171063d5b016) Description The encroach_div_data.txt file is a tab separate file. It contains the raw data used to calculate "community type" averages of richness response and ANPP. It also includes meta-data about each study included, such as the corresponding citations, study site location, study design, and yearly climate averages (precipitation and temperature). Column descriptions: 1. Community_Type = the name of the community type that the study was categorized as 2. Richness_Cit = the first author name and year for of each site richness data 3. ANPP_Cit = the first author name and year for of each site richness data 4. Location= the location where the study took place, usually a nearby city, wildlife refuge or research station 5. State/Province = U.S. state or Canadian province where the study took place 6. Encroaching_Species: species name of the predominate encroaching species in the study 7. Study_Design = the type of study design used to compare encroached and unencroaced richness ('WvG' denotes a binary comparison between encroached and unencroached treatments in the same year[s] with species richness expressed as the number of species per plot, 'Inven' denotes a binary comparison between encroached and unencroached treatments in the same year[s] with species richness expressed as the total number of species found in unencroached and encroached treatments, 'HC' denotes a binary comparison before and after encroachment occurred in the same plots with species richness expressed as the number of species per plot, 'REG' denotes a comparison of woody cover [%] to species richness in the same year[s] with species richness expressed as the number of species per plot) 8. Latitude = latitude of the study site (decimal degrees) 9. Longitude: longitude of the study site (decimal degrees) 10. MAP = mean annual precipitation at the study site (mm/yr)_ 11. MAT = mean annual temperature of the study site (°C) 12. Richness_Response: richness response (unitless) 13. ANPP_Unencroached = annual aboveground net primary productivity measured in unencroached plots (g/ 14. ANPP_Encroached = annual aboveground net primary productivity measured in encroached plots (g/m<sup>2</sup>) Missing values are represented as "---" Check-sum values are: Column 8 (Latitude): SUM = 1186.73; 0 values missing (rows with data: 30) Column 9 (Longitude): SUM = -31870.377; 0 values missing (rows with data: 30) Column 10 (MAP): SUM = 16652.360; 0 values missing (rows with data: 30) Column 11 (MAT): SUM = 324.211; 0 values missing (rows with data: 30) Column 12 (Richness_response): SUM = -19.494; 0 values missing (rows with data: 30) Column 13 (ANPP_Unencroaced): SUM = 4500.100; 13 values missing (rows with data: 17) Column 14 (ANPP_Encroached): SUM = 13248.200; 12 values missing (rows with data: 18)
DOI: 10.25345/c58t9p
title: MassIVE MSV000086078 - Longitudinal TMT proteomics of mouse plasma upon infection with Salmonella Typhimurium
title: 6plex TMT proteomics of mouse plasma at six time points upon infection with Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552846
title: Full Archive

description: Full Archive
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552843
title: Appendix A. The ordered list of small-bodied species referred to in Fig. 2.

description: The ordered list of small-bodied species referred to in Fig. 2.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552843.v1
title: Appendix A. The ordered list of small-bodied species referred to in Fig. 2.

description: The ordered list of small-bodied species referred to in Fig. 2.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552840
title: Appendix A. Tables showing number of first captures and recaptures of metamorphs, males and females for the years 1989–1997 and body mass at metamorphosis, size at metamorphosis and date of metamorphosis of male and female spadefoot toads for the years 1989–1993.

description: Tables showing number of first captures and recaptures of metamorphs, males and females for the years 1989–1997 and body mass at metamorphosis, size at metamorphosis and date of metamorphosis of male and female spadefoot toads for the years 1989–1993.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552837
title: Appendix B. Tables showing model selection results for intermediate steps of the mark-recapture analysis.

description: Tables showing model selection results for intermediate steps of the mark-recapture analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552840.v1
title: Appendix A. Tables showing number of first captures and recaptures of metamorphs, males and females for the years 1989–1997 and body mass at metamorphosis, size at metamorphosis and date of metamorphosis of male and female spadefoot toads for the years 1989–1993.

description: Tables showing number of first captures and recaptures of metamorphs, males and females for the years 1989–1997 and body mass at metamorphosis, size at metamorphosis and date of metamorphosis of male and female spadefoot toads for the years 1989–1993.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552834
title: Appendix C. Description of the multi-state mark-recapture model in matrix notation.

description: Description of the multi-state mark-recapture model in matrix notation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552834.v1
title: Appendix C. Description of the multi-state mark-recapture model in matrix notation.

description: Description of the multi-state mark-recapture model in matrix notation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552831
title: Appendix D. Description of the projection matrix model.

description: Description of the projection matrix model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552831.v1
title: Appendix D. Description of the projection matrix model.

description: Description of the projection matrix model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552828
title: Appendix E. Results of a simulation study exploring the effects (i.e., absolute and relative bias) of an uneven sex ratio at metamorphosis on juvenile survival, adult survival, recapture probability and probability to reproduce at an age of 1 year.

description: Results of a simulation study exploring the effects (i.e., absolute and relative bias) of an uneven sex ratio at metamorphosis on juvenile survival, adult survival, recapture probability and probability to reproduce at an age of 1 year.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552828.v1
title: Appendix E. Results of a simulation study exploring the effects (i.e., absolute and relative bias) of an uneven sex ratio at metamorphosis on juvenile survival, adult survival, recapture probability and probability to reproduce at an age of 1 year.

description: Results of a simulation study exploring the effects (i.e., absolute and relative bias) of an uneven sex ratio at metamorphosis on juvenile survival, adult survival, recapture probability and probability to reproduce at an age of 1 year.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552825
title: Appendix A. More data, derivation of the DEB model, and further development of the conversion efficiency mechanism.

description: More data, derivation of the DEB model, and further development of the conversion efficiency mechanism.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552825.v1
title: Appendix A. More data, derivation of the DEB model, and further development of the conversion efficiency mechanism.

description: More data, derivation of the DEB model, and further development of the conversion efficiency mechanism.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552822
title: Appendix A. A table defining parameters and variables and three figures summarizing methods and results of assays used to obtain model parameter estimates.

description: A table defining parameters and variables and three figures summarizing methods and results of assays used to obtain model parameter estimates.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552819
title: Appendix B. Six figures showing results of prey invasibility assays, example model dynamics, model predictions, and population dynamics for all experimental treatments and replicates.

description: Six figures showing results of prey invasibility assays, example model dynamics, model predictions, and population dynamics for all experimental treatments and replicates.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552822.v1
title: Appendix A. A table defining parameters and variables and three figures summarizing methods and results of assays used to obtain model parameter estimates.

description: A table defining parameters and variables and three figures summarizing methods and results of assays used to obtain model parameter estimates.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552819.v1
title: Appendix B. Six figures showing results of prey invasibility assays, example model dynamics, model predictions, and population dynamics for all experimental treatments and replicates.

description: Six figures showing results of prey invasibility assays, example model dynamics, model predictions, and population dynamics for all experimental treatments and replicates.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552813
title: Appendix B. Aerial photographs of our plots and their binary images after imaging processing.

description: Aerial photographs of our plots and their binary images after imaging processing.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552813.v1
title: Appendix B. Aerial photographs of our plots and their binary images after imaging processing.

description: Aerial photographs of our plots and their binary images after imaging processing.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552810
title: Appendix A. List of journals included in Web of Science literature searches.

description: List of journals included in Web of Science literature searches.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552810.v1
title: Appendix A. List of journals included in Web of Science literature searches.

description: List of journals included in Web of Science literature searches.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552807
title: Appendix A. Four figures documenting vegetation cover at each of the study sites in the Zhangjiang Estuary.

description: Four figures documenting vegetation cover at each of the study sites in the Zhangjiang Estuary.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552804
title: Appendix B. A table presenting density and vegetation structure of three dominant mangrove species along a salinity gradient in Zhangjiang Estuary in 2007.

description: A table presenting density and vegetation structure of three dominant mangrove species along a salinity gradient in Zhangjiang Estuary in 2007.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552804.v1
title: Appendix B. A table presenting density and vegetation structure of three dominant mangrove species along a salinity gradient in Zhangjiang Estuary in 2007.

description: A table presenting density and vegetation structure of three dominant mangrove species along a salinity gradient in Zhangjiang Estuary in 2007.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552801
title: Appendix C. A table presenting density and vegetative growth, and lateral expansion of Spartina alterniflora stands along a salinity gradient in Zhangjiang Estuary in 2008.

description: A table presenting density and vegetative growth, and lateral expansion of Spartina alterniflora stands along a salinity gradient in Zhangjiang Estuary in 2008.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3552801.v1
title: Appendix C. A table presenting density and vegetative growth, and lateral expansion of Spartina alterniflora stands along a salinity gradient in Zhangjiang Estuary in 2008.

description: A table presenting density and vegetative growth, and lateral expansion of Spartina alterniflora stands along a salinity gradient in Zhangjiang Estuary in 2008.