DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18801857
title: Raw data for 'Control of High-Frequency Surface Acoustic Waves via Transducer Geometry and Higher-Order Mode Equivalency'

description: The data are uploaded into 3 folders. The folder named 'Figure__data' contains the dataset for the figures in the manuscript. The second (named 'Constant_P_1000nm') and third (named 'Constant_DC_25_and_others') folders contain the raw data for constant P = 1000 nm and constant duty cycle of 25% (and additional duty cycles), respectively.

Folder 1: contains 4 subfolders for Figures 1-4 in the manuscript.

Figure 1 subfolder:  Figure 1a- Diffraction data plotted w.r.t delay in the inset.

Figure 1b-SAW signals for the first-order (FO) of nanogratings with constant P = 1000 nm.

Figure 1b inset - zoomed in view at larger delays for Figure 1b.

Figure 1c-SAW signals for the second-order (SO) of the nanograting with constant P = 1000 nm.

Figure 1c inset - zoomed in view at larger delays for Figure 1c.

Figure 1d-Normalised SAW frequency vs linewidth (L) for FO of nanogratings with constant P = 1000 nm, both experimental data and simulated data.

Figure 1e-Normalised SAW frequency vs linewidth (L) for SO of nanogratings with constant P = 1000 nm, both experimental data and simulated data.

Figure 1g- simulated strain gradients vs x for different L at constant P = 1000 nm.

 

Figure 2 subfolder: Figure 2a-SAW signals for FO of nanogratings with a constant duty cycle of 25%.

Figure 2b- SAW signals for SO of nanogratings with a constant duty cycle of 25%.

Figure 2c- SAW frequency vs periodicity (P)  at constant duty cycle of 25% for FO, both experimental and simulation data.

Figure 2d- SAW frequency vs periodicity (P)  at constant duty cycle of 25% for SO, both experimental and simulation data.

Figure 2e- Dispersion curve at constant duty cycle of 25% for FO, both experimental and simulation data.

Figure 2f- Dispersion curve at constant duty cycle of 25% for SO, both experimental and simulation data.

 

Figure 3 subfolder: Figure 3a- Representative SAW signals and decaying sinusoidal fits for FO of nanogratings with a constant duty cycle of 25% - L/P = 70/280 and 350/1400.

Figure 3b- Attenuation time vs SAW frequency for FO and SO with experimental error bar for both. Simulated attenuation times are shown as solid lines.

Figure 3b inset- Attenuation time vs wave vector for FO and SO with experimental error bar for both. Simulated attenuation times are shown as solid lines.

Figure 3c- SAW likeness coefficient vs normalized frequency for P = 280, 480, 800, and 1400 nm.

 

 

Figure 4 subfolder: Figure 4a- Representative SAW signals and decaying sinusoidal fits for SO of nanogratings with a constant P = 1000 nm - L/P = 70/280 and 350/1400.

Figure 4b- Attenuation time vs SAW frequency for SO with experimental error bar. Simulated attenuation times are shown as solid lines.

Figure 4c- SAW likeness coefficient vs normalized frequency for L = 70, 200, and 500nm.

All other details are provided in the readme file for each figure, located in the figure subfolders 1, 2, 3, and 4.

 

Folder 2:  Raw data (diffraction images) of nanogratings with constant P = 1000 nm in 7 folders at a fluence of 4.2 mJ/cm2. Readme files are attached to the folder.

File 3:  Raw data (diffraction images) of nanogratings with a constant duty cycle of 25% in 7 folders at a fluence of 4.2 mJ/cm2. Readme files are attached to the folder.