cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.15468/dl.dmwf7a
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 80351 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "TaxonKey" : [
 "is Coryphaena hippurus Linnaeus, 1758"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 80351 records from 192 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0032053-220831081235567/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.28740455.v2
title: Data on Metacognitive Strategy Use in Tourism and Hospitality Higher Education at Brusov State University, Yerevan, Armenia

description: The data was collected at Brusov State University in Armenia and serves as a supplemental material for the research on metacognitive strategies applied in tourism and hospitality higher education(Confidence Level. Response Results). Over one semester, students' academic progress (Test1 and Test2 Results) was evaluated by comparing their performance before and after the introduction of metacognitive strategies implemented during the second half of the semester. Throughout the study, students participated in structured self-assessments (Pre- and Post Lesson Surveys) and confidence-based evaluations to monitor their understanding and perceived competence. Statistical analysis revealed a significant improvement in academic performance, with many students reaching higher competence levels and demonstrating increased self-awareness.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.28683629.v1
title: Edaravone inhibits neuronal ferroptosis and alleviates acute Central nervous system injury induced by diquat <i>via</i> enhancement of METTL14-mediated m6A methylation of Aldh1l1

description: The biological effects of edaravone (Eda), a free radical scavenger, include anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and neuroprotective qualities. Nevertheless, the function and potential mechanisms of Eda in central nervous system injury damage are still unknown. A rat model of acute diquat toxicity was constructed to observe the pathological changes in brain tissues after diquat administration. The changes of mitophagy and ferroptosis in PC12 cells were assessed to the protective activity of Eda. To assess the methylation levels of m6A RNA, the EpiQuik m6A RNA Methylation Quantification Kit was utilized. RIP, dual luciferase reporter assay and mRNA stability detection confirm the relationship between METTL14 and Aldh11l1. Knockdown and overexpression experiments were performed to determine the effects of METTL14 and Aldh1l1 on rats and PC12 cells stimulated with diquat under Eda treatment. Eda dramatically ameliorated diquat-induced central nervous system injury. Eda notably attenuated apoptosis, pro-inflammatory cytokines activation, and oxidative stress damage in diquat-induced rats. Eda significantly suppressed apoptosis, mitophagy and ferroptosis after diquat-stimulated PC12 cells. Mitophagy inhibitor Mdivi-1 reversed the induction of ferroptosis effects of diquat via decreased Fe2+ content and increased Ca2+ level. knockdown of METTL14 reversed the therapeutic effect of Eda on diquat-induced injury. Eda promoted METTL14-mediated Aldh1l1 m6A methylation and alleviates acute central nervous system injury induced by diquat in vivo and in vitro. Eda has a protective effect on diquat-induced nervous system injury, and its mechanism may be related to the activation of m6A modification of Aldh11l1 by METTL14 and the inhibition of mitophagy and ferroptosis. Edaravone ameliorates central nervous system injury induced by diquat <i>in vivo</i>.Edaravone attenuates diquat induced ferroptosis by inhibiting mitophagy.Edaravone promotes METTL14-mediated Aldh1l1 m6A methylation and alleviates acute central nervous system injury induced by diquat <i>in vivo</i>.Knockdown of METTL14 attenuates the protective effect of edaravone on brain tissues. Edaravone ameliorates central nervous system injury induced by diquat <i>in vivo</i>. Edaravone attenuates diquat induced ferroptosis by inhibiting mitophagy. Edaravone promotes METTL14-mediated Aldh1l1 m6A methylation and alleviates acute central nervous system injury induced by diquat <i>in vivo</i>. Knockdown of METTL14 attenuates the protective effect of edaravone on brain tissues.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.28683629
title: Edaravone inhibits neuronal ferroptosis and alleviates acute Central nervous system injury induced by diquat <i>via</i> enhancement of METTL14-mediated m6A methylation of Aldh1l1

description: The biological effects of edaravone (Eda), a free radical scavenger, include anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and neuroprotective qualities. Nevertheless, the function and potential mechanisms of Eda in central nervous system injury damage are still unknown. A rat model of acute diquat toxicity was constructed to observe the pathological changes in brain tissues after diquat administration. The changes of mitophagy and ferroptosis in PC12 cells were assessed to the protective activity of Eda. To assess the methylation levels of m6A RNA, the EpiQuik m6A RNA Methylation Quantification Kit was utilized. RIP, dual luciferase reporter assay and mRNA stability detection confirm the relationship between METTL14 and Aldh11l1. Knockdown and overexpression experiments were performed to determine the effects of METTL14 and Aldh1l1 on rats and PC12 cells stimulated with diquat under Eda treatment. Eda dramatically ameliorated diquat-induced central nervous system injury. Eda notably attenuated apoptosis, pro-inflammatory cytokines activation, and oxidative stress damage in diquat-induced rats. Eda significantly suppressed apoptosis, mitophagy and ferroptosis after diquat-stimulated PC12 cells. Mitophagy inhibitor Mdivi-1 reversed the induction of ferroptosis effects of diquat via decreased Fe2+ content and increased Ca2+ level. knockdown of METTL14 reversed the therapeutic effect of Eda on diquat-induced injury. Eda promoted METTL14-mediated Aldh1l1 m6A methylation and alleviates acute central nervous system injury induced by diquat in vivo and in vitro. Eda has a protective effect on diquat-induced nervous system injury, and its mechanism may be related to the activation of m6A modification of Aldh11l1 by METTL14 and the inhibition of mitophagy and ferroptosis. Edaravone ameliorates central nervous system injury induced by diquat <i>in vivo</i>.Edaravone attenuates diquat induced ferroptosis by inhibiting mitophagy.Edaravone promotes METTL14-mediated Aldh1l1 m6A methylation and alleviates acute central nervous system injury induced by diquat <i>in vivo</i>.Knockdown of METTL14 attenuates the protective effect of edaravone on brain tissues. Edaravone ameliorates central nervous system injury induced by diquat <i>in vivo</i>. Edaravone attenuates diquat induced ferroptosis by inhibiting mitophagy. Edaravone promotes METTL14-mediated Aldh1l1 m6A methylation and alleviates acute central nervous system injury induced by diquat <i>in vivo</i>. Knockdown of METTL14 attenuates the protective effect of edaravone on brain tissues.
DOI: 10.25824/redu/2zpgpr
title: Inoculação a seco de amendoim

description: Esses arquivos, possuem dados sobre a pesquisa de Doutorado realizada pela aluna Flávia Souza Prestes, a respeito do artigo intitulado "Assessing dry inoculation carriers and Salmonella transfer in low moisture foods: a peanut based model investigation"
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15170210
title: Ecoscape SLIs
title: Replication Package of the SLO values provided by Ecoscape
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15170211
title: Ecoscape SLIs
title: Replication Package of the SLO values provided by Ecoscape
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr03290.v1
title: ABC News/Washington Post Terrorist Attack Poll #2, September 2001
title: Version 1

description: This special topic poll, conducted September 13, 2001, was
undertaken to assess respondents' reactions to and feelings about the
terrorist attacks that destroyed the World Trade Center towers in New
York City, damaged the Pentagon in Washington, DC, and resulted in a
plane crash in Pennsylvania on September 11, 2001. Respondents were
asked to give their opinions of President George W. Bush and his
handling of the presidency and the terrorist attacks. Respondents were
asked whether they believed that the United States government did all
it reasonably could do to try to prevent the attacks, and whether they
were confident in the ability of the United States government to
prevent future terrorist attacks against America. Assuming that the
United States is able to identify the groups and/or nations
responsible for the attacks, those queried were asked whether they
would support taking military action in response. Respondents were
asked whether they would feel the same way if military action meant
that innocent civilians in other countries might be injured or killed
and if military action resulted in a long war with large numbers of
troops injured or killed. Those queried were asked whether they
believed that the United States would go to war as a result of
Tuesday's attacks. Respondents' opinions were elicited on Osama bin
Laden, a suspect in the recent attacks, who reportedly lived in
Afghanistan and was indicted for directing previous terrorist
attacks. They were asked whether they would support attacking
Afghanistan militarily if Afghanistan did not turn bin Laden over to
the United States. Respondents were also asked whether they would
support new laws that would make it easier for the FBI and other
authorities to investigate suspected terrorists, giving up some of
their personal liberties and privacy as a result of such laws, and
whether they would support new airport security measures that might
cause long delays in air travel. Those surveyed were asked about their
personal safety concerns regarding upcoming air travel and whether
they had cancelled or were planning to cancel future travel
plans. Additional topics covered whether the attacks had made
respondents more suspicious of people of Arab descent, how their
children were reacting to the acts of terrorism, and whether the
economy was heading into a recession. Background information on
respondents includes age, gender, political party, children in
household, and frequency of air travel.
description: Datasets: 
DS1: ABC News/Washington Post Terrorist Attack Poll #2, September 2001
description: The data are provided as an SPSS portable file.This collection has not been processed by ICPSR staff. ICPSR is
distributing the data and documentation for this collection in
essentially the same form in which they were received. When
appropriate, documentation has been converted to Portable Document
Format (PDF), data files have been converted to non-platform-specific
formats, and variables have been recoded to ensure respondents'
anonymity.
DOI: 10.60707/xnxf-m505
title: OREX-803089-100
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr03294.v1
title: ABC News/Washington Post Terrorist Attack Poll #3, September 2001
title: Version 1

description: This special topic poll, conducted September 20, 2001, was
undertaken to assess respondents' reactions to and feelings about the
terrorist attacks that destroyed the World Trade Center towers in New
York City, damaged the Pentagon in Washington, DC, and caused a plane
crash in Pennsylvania on September 11, 2001. Respondents were asked
whether they approved of President George W. Bush's response to the
September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks as well as his proposed
remedies, what the consequences were of various levels of military
action that could be taken in response to the terrorist threat, and
how they viewed the state of the nation's economy. Respondents were
also asked whether they watched or listened to any of Bush's address
to Congress on September 20, 2001, how much Bush's proposed measures
such as stricter airport security, stronger law enforcement efforts,
and the creation of a new White House office for domestic security
would reduce the risk of another major terrorist attack in this
country, and whether Bush's speech made respondents more or less
confident in the ability of the United States to deal with the crisis.
Assuming that the groups and nations responsible for the terrorist
attacks were identified, respondents were asked whether they would
support military action against these groups, and whether they would
support military action even if it meant getting into a war. Opinions
were elicited on whether the United States should limit its military
action to the terrorist groups and nations responsible for the
September 11, 2001, attacks or broaden its actions to include all
terrorist groups and nations, whether taking or not taking military
action would result in a greater risk of further terrorism in this
country, whether large numbers of troops would be killed and wounded,
and whether military action would last for a few weeks, a few months,
a year or so, or several years. Concerning the nation's economy,
respondents were asked to describe the current state of the economy as
excellent, good, not so good, or poor, and to comment on whether the
economy was heading into a recession. Background information on
respondents includes political party, age, race, and gender.
description: Datasets: 
DS1: ABC News/Washington Post Terrorist Attack Poll #3, September 2001
description: The data are provided as an SPSS portable file.This collection has not been processed by ICPSR staff. ICPSR is
distributing the data and documentation for this collection in
essentially the same form in which they were received. When
appropriate, documentation has been converted to Portable Document
Format (PDF), data files have been converted to non-platform-specific
formats, and variables have been recoded to ensure respondents'
anonymity.Produced by Taylor Nelson Sofres Intersearch, Horsham, PA, 2001.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr03294
title: ABC News/Washington Post Terrorist Attack Poll #3, September 2001
title: Archival Version

description: This special topic poll, conducted September 20, 2001, was
undertaken to assess respondents' reactions to and feelings about the
terrorist attacks that destroyed the World Trade Center towers in New
York City, damaged the Pentagon in Washington, DC, and caused a plane
crash in Pennsylvania on September 11, 2001. Respondents were asked
whether they approved of President George W. Bush's response to the
September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks as well as his proposed
remedies, what the consequences were of various levels of military
action that could be taken in response to the terrorist threat, and
how they viewed the state of the nation's economy. Respondents were
also asked whether they watched or listened to any of Bush's address
to Congress on September 20, 2001, how much Bush's proposed measures
such as stricter airport security, stronger law enforcement efforts,
and the creation of a new White House office for domestic security
would reduce the risk of another major terrorist attack in this
country, and whether Bush's speech made respondents more or less
confident in the ability of the United States to deal with the crisis.
Assuming that the groups and nations responsible for the terrorist
attacks were identified, respondents were asked whether they would
support military action against these groups, and whether they would
support military action even if it meant getting into a war. Opinions
were elicited on whether the United States should limit its military
action to the terrorist groups and nations responsible for the
September 11, 2001, attacks or broaden its actions to include all
terrorist groups and nations, whether taking or not taking military
action would result in a greater risk of further terrorism in this
country, whether large numbers of troops would be killed and wounded,
and whether military action would last for a few weeks, a few months,
a year or so, or several years. Concerning the nation's economy,
respondents were asked to describe the current state of the economy as
excellent, good, not so good, or poor, and to comment on whether the
economy was heading into a recession. Background information on
respondents includes political party, age, race, and gender.
description: Datasets: 
DS1: ABC News/Washington Post Terrorist Attack Poll #3, September 2001
description: The data are provided as an SPSS portable file.This collection has not been processed by ICPSR staff. ICPSR is
distributing the data and documentation for this collection in
essentially the same form in which they were received. When
appropriate, documentation has been converted to Portable Document
Format (PDF), data files have been converted to non-platform-specific
formats, and variables have been recoded to ensure respondents'
anonymity.Produced by Taylor Nelson Sofres Intersearch, Horsham, PA, 2001.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr02336.v1
title: Survey of Consumer Attitudes and Behavior, August 1995
title: Version 1

description: The Survey of Consumer Attitudes and Behavior series (also known as the Surveys of Consumers) was undertaken to measure changes in consumer attitudes and expectations, to understand why such changes occur, and to evaluate how they relate to consumer decisions to save, borrow, or make discretionary purchases. This type of information is essential
for forecasting changes in aggregate consumer behavior. Since the
1940s, these surveys have been produced quarterly through 1977 and
monthly thereafter. Each monthly survey probes a different aspect of
consumer confidence. Open-ended questions are asked concerning
evaluations and expectations about personal finances, employment,
price changes, and the national business situation. Additional
questions probe buying intentions for automobiles and the respondent's
appraisals of present market conditions for purchasing houses,
automobiles, and other durables. Demographic information includes
ethnic origin, sex, age, and education.
description: National sample of dwelling units selected by area
probability sampling.
description: Datasets: 
DS1: Survey of Consumer Attitudes and Behavior, August 1995
description: Population of the United States aged 18 and older in
households.
description: Additional information on the Surveys of Consumers can be found by visiting the Surveys of Consumers Web site.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr03295.v1
title: ABC News/Washington Post Terrorist Attack Poll #4, September 2001
title: Version 1

description: This special topic poll, conducted September 25-27, 2001,
was undertaken to assess respondents' reactions to and feelings about
the terrorist attacks that destroyed the World Trade Center towers in
New York City, damaged the Pentagon in Washington, DC, and caused a
plane crash in Pennsylvania on September 11, 2001. Respondents were
asked to give their opinions of the way President George W. Bush was
handling the presidency and the terrorist attacks. Respondents were also
asked whether they would support taking military action in response,
and whether they believed that the United States government would go
to war as a result of the attacks. They were further asked whether
they would feel the same way if military action caused the death of or
injured innocent civilians in other countries and large numbers of
American troops due to a long war. Respondents were queried on
whether they would support mounting a broader war against terrorist
groups and the nations that support them,
whether they believed there would be more major terrorist attacks
in this country, what the United States must do in its war on
international terrorism, and, supposing that the United States accomplished
all of its objectives, whether it would still have won the war on terrorism
if there were to be another major terrorist attack. Respondents'
opinions were elicited on Osama bin Laden, the main suspect in
the attack, who was reportedly living in Afghanistan. They were asked
whether they believed that the United States would capture or kill bin
Laden, and would be able to significantly reduce terrorist attacks
against the United States. Respondents were also asked whether action
on education reform and prescription drugs for seniors should be
postponed for at least a year because of the war on terrorism.
Additional topics covered how much the respondents trusted the
government to do the right thing, how patriotic they were, whether they
appreciated more the privileges they had in this country, and whether
they were more willing to make personal sacrifices for the good of the
country. Background information on respondents includes age, gender,
political party, education, residency, marital status, children in
household, race, and household income.
description: Datasets: 
DS1: ABC News/Washington Post Terrorist Attack Poll #4, September 2001
description: The data are provided as an SPSS portable file.This collection has not been processed by ICPSR staff. ICPSR is
distributing the data and documentation for this collection in
essentially the same form in which they were received. When
appropriate, documentation has been converted to Portable Document
Format (PDF), data files have been converted to non-platform-specific
formats, and variables have been recoded to ensure respondents'
anonymity.Produced by Taylor Nelson Sofres Intersearch, Horsham, PA, 2001.
DOI: 10.26030/q6n1-hh96
title: Salivary microbiome sequencing of astronauts

description: This study's goal was to examine if any salivary microbiome changes were observed in astronauts as a result of spaceflight. In addition, this study looked for any microbiome signature that may be associated with viral reactivation in humans
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr03289.v1
title: ABC News/Washington Post Terrorist Attack Poll #1, September 2001
title: Version 1

description: This special topic poll, conducted September 11, 2001, was
undertaken to assess respondents' reactions to and feelings about the
terrorist attacks that destroyed the World Trade Center towers in New
York City, damaged the Pentagon in Washington, DC, and resulted in a
plane crash in Pennsylvania, earlier that day. Respondents were asked
whether they believed that the United States government did all it
reasonably could do to try to prevent the attacks, whether they were
confident in the ability of the United States government to prevent
further terrorist attacks against America, and whether they were
concerned that someone they knew or their community might be a victim
of future acts of terrorism. Assuming that the United States is able
to identify the groups and/or nations responsible for the attacks,
those queried were asked whether they would support taking military
action in response, whether they would support such action if it meant
war, and whether military action should be taken against countries
that assist or shelter known terrorists. The poll gauged respondents'
level of confidence in the ability of the United States government to
find and punish those responsible and assessed whether respondents
were willing to give up some liberties to crack down on terrorism. In
addition, those surveyed were asked whether they did any of the
following on that day: contacted family and friends, stayed home or
left work early, watched or listened to broadcast news, prayed for the
victims and their families, and/or changed their daily
routines. Background information on respondents includes age, gender,
employment status, Hispanic origin, and size of community in which
they resided.
description: Datasets: 
DS1: ABC News/Washington Post Terrorist Attack Poll #1, September 2001
description: The data are provided as an SPSS portable file.This collection has not been processed by ICPSR staff. ICPSR is
distributing the data and documentation for this collection in
essentially the same form in which they were received. When
appropriate, documentation has been converted to Portable Document
Format (PDF), data files have been converted to non-platform-specific
formats, and variables have been recoded to ensure respondents'
anonymity.