cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-2384-1
title: Farm Business Survey, 1984-1985: Special Licence Access
title: Farm Business Survey, 1982- : Special Licence Access

description: &lt;p&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Farm Business Survey&lt;/span&gt; (FBS) is conducted annually to collect business information from about 2,100 farms in England and Wales. The survey provides information on the financial position and physical and economic performance of farm businesses, to inform policy decisions on matters affecting farm businesses and to enable analysis of the impacts of policy options. It is intended to serve the needs of farmers, farming and land management interest groups, government (both national and European), government partners, and researchers. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The primary objective of survey results is to contrast the performance or other business characteristics of different groupings of farm, such as between regions or other geographical or environmental designations, farm types, farm size, age or education of farmer, etc. Up to and including the 2001/02 survey, FBS estimates were based on matching the sample between two adjacent years and farm weights. Farm weights were still calculated to present a matched sample however. From the 2002/03 survey onwards, matching between adjacent years was dropped altogether, and weights are now calculated for the full sample. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The typology used to determine the FBS farm type classification has been revised from 2009 onwards. The FBS typology is now based on standard outputs expressed in euros, with a minimum threshold of 25,000 euro (irrespective of the SLR) for FBS eligibility. Between 2009 and 2011, FBS farm type classification was based on 2007 standard output (SO) coefficients. From 2012, the farm type classification was based on 2010 SO coefficients, and from 2017 the FBS farm type classification was based on 2013 SO coefficients. The coefficients have been revised again for 2023/24 and are based on 2017 coefficients. The change in typology has had an effect on the distribution of farms by farm type and income averages. Further information regarding the change in typology is available on the GOV.UK &lt;a href="https://www.gov.uk/guidance/farm-business-survey-technical-notes-and-guidance#fbs-documents"&gt;FBS documents&lt;/a&gt; web page.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The &lt;i&gt;Farm Business Survey&lt;/i&gt; is available from UKDS under Special Licence access conditions. See the' Access data' section for further details on how to apply for access to the data.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt; For the second edition (February 2010), the data and documentation have been updated. This study was previously held in the form of SPSS files generated from a SIR database, which covered two survey years. The depositors have recently undergone a program to compile older data in the FBS series into Access databases, both to improve usability of the older data and compatibility with the later FBS waves, that are already available in Access format. Documentation has also been provided in similar format to current FBS surveys.&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-2578-1
title: Farm Business Survey, 1987-1988: Special Licence Access
title: Farm Business Survey, 1982- : Special Licence Access

description: &lt;p&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Farm Business Survey&lt;/span&gt; (FBS) is conducted annually to collect business information from about 2,100 farms in England and Wales. The survey provides information on the financial position and physical and economic performance of farm businesses, to inform policy decisions on matters affecting farm businesses and to enable analysis of the impacts of policy options. It is intended to serve the needs of farmers, farming and land management interest groups, government (both national and European), government partners, and researchers. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The primary objective of survey results is to contrast the performance or other business characteristics of different groupings of farm, such as between regions or other geographical or environmental designations, farm types, farm size, age or education of farmer, etc. Up to and including the 2001/02 survey, FBS estimates were based on matching the sample between two adjacent years and farm weights. Farm weights were still calculated to present a matched sample however. From the 2002/03 survey onwards, matching between adjacent years was dropped altogether, and weights are now calculated for the full sample. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The typology used to determine the FBS farm type classification has been revised from 2009 onwards. The FBS typology is now based on standard outputs expressed in euros, with a minimum threshold of 25,000 euro (irrespective of the SLR) for FBS eligibility. Between 2009 and 2011, FBS farm type classification was based on 2007 standard output (SO) coefficients. From 2012, the farm type classification was based on 2010 SO coefficients, and from 2017 the FBS farm type classification was based on 2013 SO coefficients. The coefficients have been revised again for 2023/24 and are based on 2017 coefficients. The change in typology has had an effect on the distribution of farms by farm type and income averages. Further information regarding the change in typology is available on the GOV.UK &lt;a href="https://www.gov.uk/guidance/farm-business-survey-technical-notes-and-guidance#fbs-documents"&gt;FBS documents&lt;/a&gt; web page.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The &lt;i&gt;Farm Business Survey&lt;/i&gt; is available from UKDS under Special Licence access conditions. See the' Access data' section for further details on how to apply for access to the data.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt; For the third edition (February 2010), the data format and documentation have been updated. This study was previously held in the form of SPSS files generated from a SIR database, which covered two survey years. The depositors have recently undergone a program to compile older data in the FBS series into Access databases, both to improve usability of the older data and compatibility with the later FBS waves, that are already available in Access format. Documentation has also been provided in similar format to current FBS surveys.&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.15468/dd.dcps2t
title: Distribution records of Lampanyctus phyllisae

description: These records of Lampanyctus phyllisae were downloaded from GBIF on 2019-09-11.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15143380
title: Table II in Comparative morphology of the finlet spines of the extant Polypteridae (Osteichthyes; Cladistia). Systematic interest

description: Table II. – List of the studied material. (APD: Aquarium tropical de la Porte Dorée, Paris, France; MRAC: Musée royal de l’Afrique centrale, Belgium; MNHN: Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France; PB: P. Bartsch material, Berlin, Germany; FM: F.J. Meunier material).
Polypterus ansorgeiMRAC – 6 specimensPolypterus bichir bichirMRAC – 9 specimensPolypterus bichir lapradeiMRAC – 10 specimensPolypterus bichir katangaeMRAC – 1 specimenPolypterus delheziMRAC – 10 specimensPolypterus delheziAPD – 5 specimensPolypterus delheziPB – 2 specimensPolypterus endlicheriMRAC – 20 specimensPolypterus ornatipinnisMRAC – 18 specimensPolypterus ornatipinnisPB – 3 specimensPolypterus ornatipinnisFM – 1 specimenPolypterus palmasMRAC – 12 specimensPolypterus palmasFM – 2 specimensPolypterus polliMRAC – 13 specimensPolypterus retropinnisMRAC – 12 specimensPolypterus senegalusMRAC – 57 specimensPolypterus senegalusFM – 17 specimensPolypterus weeksiiMRAC – 10 specimensErpetoichthys calabaricusADP – 9 specimens
description: Published as part of Meunier, François J. & Gayet, Mireille, 2020, Comparative morphology of the finlet spines of the extant Polypteridae (Osteichthyes; Cladistia). Systematic interest, pp. 21 in Cybium 44 (1) on page 21, DOI: 10.26028/cybium/2020-441-003, http://zenodo.org/record/10493383
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15143379
title: Table II in Comparative morphology of the finlet spines of the extant Polypteridae (Osteichthyes; Cladistia). Systematic interest

description: Table II. – List of the studied material. (APD: Aquarium tropical de la Porte Dorée, Paris, France; MRAC: Musée royal de l’Afrique centrale, Belgium; MNHN: Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France; PB: P. Bartsch material, Berlin, Germany; FM: F.J. Meunier material).
Polypterus ansorgeiMRAC – 6 specimensPolypterus bichir bichirMRAC – 9 specimensPolypterus bichir lapradeiMRAC – 10 specimensPolypterus bichir katangaeMRAC – 1 specimenPolypterus delheziMRAC – 10 specimensPolypterus delheziAPD – 5 specimensPolypterus delheziPB – 2 specimensPolypterus endlicheriMRAC – 20 specimensPolypterus ornatipinnisMRAC – 18 specimensPolypterus ornatipinnisPB – 3 specimensPolypterus ornatipinnisFM – 1 specimenPolypterus palmasMRAC – 12 specimensPolypterus palmasFM – 2 specimensPolypterus polliMRAC – 13 specimensPolypterus retropinnisMRAC – 12 specimensPolypterus senegalusMRAC – 57 specimensPolypterus senegalusFM – 17 specimensPolypterus weeksiiMRAC – 10 specimensErpetoichthys calabaricusADP – 9 specimens
description: Published as part of Meunier, François J. & Gayet, Mireille, 2020, Comparative morphology of the finlet spines of the extant Polypteridae (Osteichthyes; Cladistia). Systematic interest, pp. 21 in Cybium 44 (1) on page 21, DOI: 10.26028/cybium/2020-441-003, http://zenodo.org/record/10493383
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15160882
title: Table 16 in The coiled Middle Ordovician cephalopod genera Trocholites and Curtoceras (Tarphyceratida) from Baltoscandia and north-central Europe

description: Table 16. Conch measurements, ratios and rates of Trocholites vodickai sp. nov.
specimendmwwwhuwahCWIWWIUWIWERIZRMB.C.3217740.916.312.818.7–0.401.270.46––minus 90°37.817.512.716.6–0.461.370.44––MB.C.3217839.317.311.517.9–0.441.500.45––minus 90°36.917.011.913.7–0.461.430.37––
description: Published as part of Aubrechtová, Martina & Korn, Dieter, 2025, The coiled Middle Ordovician cephalopod genera Trocholites and Curtoceras (Tarphyceratida) from Baltoscandia and north-central Europe, pp. 50 in European Journal of Taxonomy 982 on page 50, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2025.982.2843, http://zenodo.org/record/15096341
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15143382
title: Table III. – Number of i) finlets (Nf); ii) median predorsal scales (Pds); iii) and median intermediate dorsal scales (MIS) between the successive finlets. F: females; J: juveniles, M: males. in Comparative morphology of the finlet spines of the extant Polypteridae (Osteichthyes; Cladistia). Systematic interest

description: Table III. – Number of i) finlets (Nf); ii) median predorsal scales (Pds); iii) and median intermediate dorsal scales (MIS) between the successive finlets. F: females; J: juveniles, M: males.
TaxaTotal length N° Sex Nf (mm)PdsMISP. bichir bichir1992-769F27016122, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3/3P. bichir bichir1992-769F24615123, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 4/3P. bichir bichir1992-769F25115122, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3/2P. bichir bichir1992-769F25114153, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3/3P. delhezi5506F23311143, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 3, 2P. endlicheri1986-551F32011154, 3, 3, 3, 4, 3, 3, 3, 4, 2/2P. endlicheri1986-551F26012144, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 4, 3, 3/2P. endlicheri1986-551F30512144, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 3, 3/2P. endlicheri1961-15F29212113, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2/2P. palmas72F2958274, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3/2P. palmas73F2118294, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3P. palmas5504M2107234, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3/1P. retropinnis1979-190M2718304, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2P. retropinnis1964-253M3067 32(33) 3, 4, 3, 4, 4, 2/2P. senegalus65F1859194, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3P. senegalus5511F18810154, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 2/2P. senegalus5509F19210164, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 2/1P. senegalus5515F19410173, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3/2P. senegalus5516F20511163, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 2/1P. senegalus5512F21010164, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 4, 3/2P. senegalus5513F2139174, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3/2P. senegalus5510F2389184, 4, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 2/1P. senegalus64M25511173, 4, 4, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 2
description: Published as part of Meunier, François J. & Gayet, Mireille, 2020, Comparative morphology of the finlet spines of the extant Polypteridae (Osteichthyes; Cladistia). Systematic interest, pp. 21 in Cybium 44 (1) on page 21, DOI: 10.26028/cybium/2020-441-003, http://zenodo.org/record/10493383
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15143381
title: Table III. – Number of i) finlets (Nf); ii) median predorsal scales (Pds); iii) and median intermediate dorsal scales (MIS) between the successive finlets. F: females; J: juveniles, M: males. in Comparative morphology of the finlet spines of the extant Polypteridae (Osteichthyes; Cladistia). Systematic interest

description: Table III. – Number of i) finlets (Nf); ii) median predorsal scales (Pds); iii) and median intermediate dorsal scales (MIS) between the successive finlets. F: females; J: juveniles, M: males.
TaxaTotal length N° Sex Nf (mm)PdsMISP. bichir bichir1992-769F27016122, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3/3P. bichir bichir1992-769F24615123, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 4/3P. bichir bichir1992-769F25115122, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3/2P. bichir bichir1992-769F25114153, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3/3P. delhezi5506F23311143, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 3, 2P. endlicheri1986-551F32011154, 3, 3, 3, 4, 3, 3, 3, 4, 2/2P. endlicheri1986-551F26012144, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 4, 3, 3/2P. endlicheri1986-551F30512144, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 3, 3/2P. endlicheri1961-15F29212113, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2/2P. palmas72F2958274, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3/2P. palmas73F2118294, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3P. palmas5504M2107234, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3/1P. retropinnis1979-190M2718304, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2P. retropinnis1964-253M3067 32(33) 3, 4, 3, 4, 4, 2/2P. senegalus65F1859194, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3P. senegalus5511F18810154, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 2/2P. senegalus5509F19210164, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 2/1P. senegalus5515F19410173, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3/2P. senegalus5516F20511163, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 2/1P. senegalus5512F21010164, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 4, 3/2P. senegalus5513F2139174, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3/2P. senegalus5510F2389184, 4, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 2/1P. senegalus64M25511173, 4, 4, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 2
description: Published as part of Meunier, François J. & Gayet, Mireille, 2020, Comparative morphology of the finlet spines of the extant Polypteridae (Osteichthyes; Cladistia). Systematic interest, pp. 21 in Cybium 44 (1) on page 21, DOI: 10.26028/cybium/2020-441-003, http://zenodo.org/record/10493383
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15143384
title: Table III. – Continued. in Comparative morphology of the finlet spines of the extant Polypteridae (Osteichthyes; Cladistia). Systematic interest

description: Table III. – Continued.
TaxaN°SexTotal length (mm)NfPdsMISP. senegalus63F2569203, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3P. senegalus5518M1839184, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 2/1P. senegalus67M19810163, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3P. senegalus69M20010163, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 4, 2P. senegalus68M20510164, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3P. senegalus5517M2159184, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3/2P. senegalus5508M2169203, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2/2P. senegalus5514M21610163, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 2/2P. senegalus66M2179194, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3P. senegalus70M2199174, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3P. senegalus5519M2229184, 4, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 3/2P. senegalus62M2749204, 4, 4, 4, 4-5, 4, 4, 3P. weeksii1962-334J15811214, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2/2P. weeksii1962-335J17210244, 3, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2/1Erpetoichthys calabaricus5507M23910596, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6, 5, 5, 3Erpetoichthys calabaricus5576M25312556, 6, 5, 6, 5, 5, 5, 5, 4, 3, 3/2Erpetoichthys calabaricus5523M28513516, 6, 6, 5, 6, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 4, 3/2Erpetoichthys calabaricus5577F24610595, 6, 6, 6, 5, 5, 6, 4, 3/3Erpetoichthys calabaricus5522F24811596, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 5, 3, 2/2Erpetoichthys calabaricus5520F31111556, 5, 6, 7, 6, 7, 5, 4, 4, 3/2Erpetoichthys calabaricus5521F31511605, 6, 6, 6, 6, 5, 5, 4, 4, 3/2Erpetoichthys calabaricus5505F32510577, 6, 5, 7, 6, 6, 6, 4, 3/2
description: Published as part of Meunier, François J. & Gayet, Mireille, 2020, Comparative morphology of the finlet spines of the extant Polypteridae (Osteichthyes; Cladistia). Systematic interest, pp. 22 in Cybium 44 (1) on page 22, DOI: 10.26028/cybium/2020-441-003, http://zenodo.org/record/10493383
DOI: 10.15468/dd.7vhhbk
title: Distribution records of Lampanyctus wisneri

description: These records of Lampanyctus wisneri were downloaded from GBIF on 2019-09-11.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15143383
title: Table III. – Continued. in Comparative morphology of the finlet spines of the extant Polypteridae (Osteichthyes; Cladistia). Systematic interest

description: Table III. – Continued.
TaxaN°SexTotal length (mm)NfPdsMISP. senegalus63F2569203, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3P. senegalus5518M1839184, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3, 2/1P. senegalus67M19810163, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3P. senegalus69M20010163, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 4, 2P. senegalus68M20510164, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3P. senegalus5517M2159184, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3/2P. senegalus5508M2169203, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2/2P. senegalus5514M21610163, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 2/2P. senegalus66M2179194, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3P. senegalus70M2199174, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3P. senegalus5519M2229184, 4, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 3/2P. senegalus62M2749204, 4, 4, 4, 4-5, 4, 4, 3P. weeksii1962-334J15811214, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2/2P. weeksii1962-335J17210244, 3, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2/1Erpetoichthys calabaricus5507M23910596, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6, 5, 5, 3Erpetoichthys calabaricus5576M25312556, 6, 5, 6, 5, 5, 5, 5, 4, 3, 3/2Erpetoichthys calabaricus5523M28513516, 6, 6, 5, 6, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 4, 3/2Erpetoichthys calabaricus5577F24610595, 6, 6, 6, 5, 5, 6, 4, 3/3Erpetoichthys calabaricus5522F24811596, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 5, 3, 2/2Erpetoichthys calabaricus5520F31111556, 5, 6, 7, 6, 7, 5, 4, 4, 3/2Erpetoichthys calabaricus5521F31511605, 6, 6, 6, 6, 5, 5, 4, 4, 3/2Erpetoichthys calabaricus5505F32510577, 6, 5, 7, 6, 6, 6, 4, 3/2
description: Published as part of Meunier, François J. & Gayet, Mireille, 2020, Comparative morphology of the finlet spines of the extant Polypteridae (Osteichthyes; Cladistia). Systematic interest, pp. 22 in Cybium 44 (1) on page 22, DOI: 10.26028/cybium/2020-441-003, http://zenodo.org/record/10493383
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15143393
title: Table 1 in Comparative morphology of Tonicia (Polyplacophora) geographical ecotypes from Southeastern Pacific

description: Table 1. Sample size of each ecotype of Tonicia species by ecoregions of Southeastern Pacific. Табл. 1. РаЗмер выборок каждого Экотипа видов Tonicia по Экотипам юго-восточной Пацифики.
Species/EcotypesCentral PeruHumboldtianCentral ChileAraucanianChiloenseChannels and FjordsTotalTonicia calbucensis northern ecotype12839133201Tonicia calbucensis southern ecotype131730Tonicia chilensis northern ecotype137105114239Tonicia chilensis southern ecotype415596Total14351442475472566
description: Published as part of Sirenko, B. I. & Ibáñez, C. M., 2023, Comparative morphology of Tonicia (Polyplacophora) geographical ecotypes from Southeastern Pacific, pp. 28 in Ruthenica, Russian Malacological Journal (Cambridge, England: 2003) 33 (1) on page 28, DOI: 10.35885/ruthenica.2023.33(1).4, http://zenodo.org/record/11041272
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15143394
title: Table 1 in Comparative morphology of Tonicia (Polyplacophora) geographical ecotypes from Southeastern Pacific

description: Table 1. Sample size of each ecotype of Tonicia species by ecoregions of Southeastern Pacific. Табл. 1. РаЗмер выборок каждого Экотипа видов Tonicia по Экотипам юго-восточной Пацифики.
Species/EcotypesCentral PeruHumboldtianCentral ChileAraucanianChiloenseChannels and FjordsTotalTonicia calbucensis northern ecotype12839133201Tonicia calbucensis southern ecotype131730Tonicia chilensis northern ecotype137105114239Tonicia chilensis southern ecotype415596Total14351442475472566
description: Published as part of Sirenko, B. I. & Ibáñez, C. M., 2023, Comparative morphology of Tonicia (Polyplacophora) geographical ecotypes from Southeastern Pacific, pp. 28 in Ruthenica, Russian Malacological Journal (Cambridge, England: 2003) 33 (1) on page 28, DOI: 10.35885/ruthenica.2023.33(1).4, http://zenodo.org/record/11041272
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15160884
title: Table 17 in The coiled Middle Ordovician cephalopod genera Trocholites and Curtoceras (Tarphyceratida) from Baltoscandia and north-central Europe

description: Table 17. Conch measurements, ratios and rates of Trocholites vortex sp. nov.
specimendmwwwhuwahCWIWWIUWIWERIZRMB.C.2257449.2–15.522.112.6––0.451.800.19minus 90°42.920.113.919.8–0.471.450.46––minus 180°37.216.811.017.8–0.451.520.48––
description: Published as part of Aubrechtová, Martina & Korn, Dieter, 2025, The coiled Middle Ordovician cephalopod genera Trocholites and Curtoceras (Tarphyceratida) from Baltoscandia and north-central Europe, pp. 52 in European Journal of Taxonomy 982 on page 52, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2025.982.2843, http://zenodo.org/record/15096341
DOI: 10.15468/dd.ygca2j
title: Distribution records of Diaphus kapalae

description: These records of Diaphus kapalae were downloaded from GBIF on 2019-09-11.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15143395
title: Table 2 in Comparative morphology of Tonicia (Polyplacophora) geographical ecotypes from Southeastern Pacific

description: Table 2. Mean of morphometric measurements (mm) of 16 morphological traits of each ecotype of Tonicia species. Total length (TL), total width (TW), length of plate I and plate VIII (LI and LVIII), widths of each shell plate (WI to WVIII) and anterior, lateral and posterior length of perinotum (PL, PA, PP). Табл. 2. Средние ЗначениЯ морфометрических иЗмерений (мм) 16 морфологических приЗнаков каждого Экотипа видов Tonicia. ОбЩаЯ длина (TL), обЩаЯ Ширина (TW), длина Щитка I и Щитка VIII (LI и LVIII), Ширина каждого Щитка раковины (WI до WVIII) и переднЯЯ, латеральнаЯ и ЗаднЯЯ длина перинотума (PL, PA, PP).
TraitsTonicia calbucensis Northern EcotypeTonicia calbucensis Southern EcotypeTonicia chilensis Northern EcotypeTonicia chilensis Southern EcotypeTL32.7828.4039.6240.96LI4.293.274.975.26LVIII3.953.204.535.16TW18.5512.9321.1921.83WI9.768.2310.8212.05WII11.229.3712.6213.55WIII12.5610.4714.3115.06WIV13.4010.8015.3416.08WV13.4210.9015.5016.25WVI12.8610.3014.8415.64WVII11.509.3013.2713.83WVIII8.827.339.9211.23PL5.153.206.866.49PA2.991.933.903.73PP2.211.402.982.71
description: Published as part of Sirenko, B. I. & Ibáñez, C. M., 2023, Comparative morphology of Tonicia (Polyplacophora) geographical ecotypes from Southeastern Pacific, pp. 30 in Ruthenica, Russian Malacological Journal (Cambridge, England: 2003) 33 (1) on page 30, DOI: 10.35885/ruthenica.2023.33(1).4, http://zenodo.org/record/11041272
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15143396
title: Table 2 in Comparative morphology of Tonicia (Polyplacophora) geographical ecotypes from Southeastern Pacific

description: Table 2. Mean of morphometric measurements (mm) of 16 morphological traits of each ecotype of Tonicia species. Total length (TL), total width (TW), length of plate I and plate VIII (LI and LVIII), widths of each shell plate (WI to WVIII) and anterior, lateral and posterior length of perinotum (PL, PA, PP). Табл. 2. Средние ЗначениЯ морфометрических иЗмерений (мм) 16 морфологических приЗнаков каждого Экотипа видов Tonicia. ОбЩаЯ длина (TL), обЩаЯ Ширина (TW), длина Щитка I и Щитка VIII (LI и LVIII), Ширина каждого Щитка раковины (WI до WVIII) и переднЯЯ, латеральнаЯ и ЗаднЯЯ длина перинотума (PL, PA, PP).
TraitsTonicia calbucensis Northern EcotypeTonicia calbucensis Southern EcotypeTonicia chilensis Northern EcotypeTonicia chilensis Southern EcotypeTL32.7828.4039.6240.96LI4.293.274.975.26LVIII3.953.204.535.16TW18.5512.9321.1921.83WI9.768.2310.8212.05WII11.229.3712.6213.55WIII12.5610.4714.3115.06WIV13.4010.8015.3416.08WV13.4210.9015.5016.25WVI12.8610.3014.8415.64WVII11.509.3013.2713.83WVIII8.827.339.9211.23PL5.153.206.866.49PA2.991.933.903.73PP2.211.402.982.71
description: Published as part of Sirenko, B. I. & Ibáñez, C. M., 2023, Comparative morphology of Tonicia (Polyplacophora) geographical ecotypes from Southeastern Pacific, pp. 30 in Ruthenica, Russian Malacological Journal (Cambridge, England: 2003) 33 (1) on page 30, DOI: 10.35885/ruthenica.2023.33(1).4, http://zenodo.org/record/11041272