DOI: 10.4232/1.12474
title: COCOPS Executive Survey on Public Sector Reform in Europe – Views and Experiences from Senior Executives - Vollversion
title: COCOPS Executive Survey on Public Sector Reform in Europe – Views and Experiences from Senior Executives - Full Version
title: Datenbestand für on-site Nutzung
title: Datenbestand für on-site Nutzung

description: COCOPS Executive Survey on Public Sector Reform in Europe ist eine Befragung von Führungskräften des öffentlichen Sektors in zwanzig europäischen Ländern. Die Umfrage liefert quantitative Daten über die Reformen der öffentlichen Verwaltung und ihre Auswirkungen in Europa durch die Erforschung der Wahrnehmungen, Erfahrungen und Meinungen der Akteure, die stark an der Konzeption und Umsetzung von Reformen beteiligt sind.
Allgemeine Information. Management und Arbeitspraxis in der Organisation. Reform des öffentlichen Sektors und die Finanzkrise. Einstellungen, Vorlieben und persönliche Informationen.
Themen: Typ und Größe der Organisation; Politikbereich; Position des Befragten in der Organisation; Rollenverständnis und Motivationen des Befragten; Arbeits-Autonomie; Zielklarheit; Einsatz von Management-Instrumenten; Verwendung von Leistungsindikatoren; Häufigkeit der Interaktion mit verschiedenen Akteuren; Zusammenarbeit und Koordination; Politisierung; soziales Kapital der Organisation; Arbeitszufriedenheit; Bewertung der Reformen im öffentlichen Sektor; Bedeutung der Reformtrends; Design und Dynamik der Verwaltungsreformen; Leistungsergebnisse von Reformen; Kürzungsmaßnahmen; Auswirkungen der Finanzkrise; Öffentlicher Sektor Werte; Motivation und individuelle Einstellungen; öffentlicher Sektor und organisatorische Amtszeit.
Demographie: Geschlecht; Alter (kategorisiert); Bildungsstand.
Zusätzlich verkodet wurde: ID, Land.
description: The COCOPS Executive Survey on Public Sector Reform in Europe is a survey of public sector senior executives in twenty European countries. The survey provides quantitative data regarding public administration reforms and their impacts in Europe by exploring the perceptions, experiences and opinions of the actors strongly involved in the conception and implementation of reforms. 
General Information. Management and work practice of the organisation. Public sector reform and the fiscal crisis. Attitudes, preferences, and personal information. 
Topics: 1. General information: type of organisation; policy area the organisation works in; number of employees; kind of position in the organisation (hierarchical level); self-assessment of role as public sector executive. 
2. Management and work practice of the organisation: work autonomy: degree of autonomy with regard to selected work tasks (e.g. budget allocations, promoting staff, etc.); used instruments (e.g. quality management system, etc.; goal clarity (goals clearly stated, goals communicated to staff, high number of goals, easy to observe and measure activities, mainly measure inputs and processes, mainly measure outputs and outcomes, rewarded for achieving goals, clear sanctions for not achieving goals, politicians use indicators for monitoring performance); use of performance indicators; frequency of interaction with various actors or bodies (responsible Minister, other politicians, administrative superiors and higher administrative levels, direct staff, subordinate agencies and bodies, etc.); assessment of collaboration in own policy fields between: national government bodies within the same policy area and from different policy areas, national and local / regional government bodies, national and supra-national bodies / international organisations, government bodies and private and voluntary sector stakeholders); view on selected statements regarding politicians and public administration (politicians respect technical expertise of senior executives, politicians regularly influence senior-level appointments in the organisation, politicians interfere with routine activities in the organisation, senior executives, not politicians, initiate reforms or new policies, removing issues and activities from politics produces better policies); coordination approach (e.g. refer issue upwards in the hierarchy or to political actors and bodies, set up special purpose bodies, etc.); characterization of staff (e.g. engage in open and honest communication with one another, share and accept constructive criticism, etc.); attitudes towards work and towards the organisation (e.g. satisfaction from work, feel valued for the work, etc.). 
3. Public sector reform and the fiscal crisis: assessment of development of public administration in the country compared with 5 years ago; importance of selected reform trends in own policy area; design and dynamics of administration reforms (top down vs. bottom up, consistent vs. inconsistent, comprehensive vs. partial, driven by politicians vs. by senior executives, crisis and incident driven vs. planned, substantive vs. symbolic, contested vs. supported by unions, cost-cutting vs. service improvement, no vs. high public involvement, unsuccessful vs. successful, too demanding vs. not demanding enough, 10-point scale); performance outcomes of public administration over the last 5 years on selected dimensions (e.g. cost and efficiency, service quality, innovation, etc.); fiscal crisis: general approach to savings in response to the fiscal crisis; cutback measures; effects of the fiscal crisis (power of the Ministry of Finance has increased, decision making in organisation centralized, budget planning unit gained power, conflict between departments in organisation increased, power of politicians in the decision making process has increased, relevance of performance information increased). 
4. Attitudes and preferences: public sector values: value trade-off (quality - efficiency, equity -efficiency, following rules - achieving results, customer focus - citizen orientation, state provision - market provision, tax financed - user fees, 7-point scale); motivation: importance of various occupation characteristics like interesting work, high income, etc.; individual attitudes (success depends on ability, I like taking responsibility for making decisions, I make decisions and move on, importance of being creative and thinking up new ideas, avoid anything that might upset the status quo, importance of being successful, like to take risks, most people can be trusted); subject of the highest educational qualification; seniority: number of years the respondent has been working in the public sector, in the current organisation and in the current position; work experience in the private sector and in the non-profit sector.
Demography: age (categorized), sex; highest education level. 
Additionally coded was: country; ID.
description: Selbstausfüller: Papier
Selbstausfüller: CAWI (Computerunterstütztes Webinterview)
description: Self-administered questionnaire: CAWI (Computer Assisted Web Interview)
Self-administered questionnaire: Paper
description: Beamte des höheren und des gehobenen Dienstes, die in ihren jeweiligen Positionen am ehesten das relevante Wissen über (NPM-Typ) Reformen und Entwicklungen im öffentlichen Sektor haben. Die Stichprobe umfasst alle Führungskräfte des höheren und gehobenen Dienstes wie folgt: In zentralen Ministerien der Regierung und nachgeordneten Behörden wurden die beiden ersten Verwaltungsebenen abgedeckt; wenn es aufgrund politischer Relevanz notwendig erschien, wurden auch dritte Ebenen angesprochen. Gemeindeverwaltungen und Dienstleistungsebenen wurden ausgeschlossen. Insbesondere in den Politikfeldern Beschäftigung und Gesundheit wurden, da Schwerpunktbereiche des Projekts, regionale und staatliche Ministerien und Behörden einbezogen, jedoch ohne direkte Dienstleistungsebenen anzusprechen.
description: Top and medium-high level civil servants who, in their respective positions, are most likely to hold the relevant knowledge regarding (NPM-type of) reforms and developments within the public sector. The sample covers all top and higher-level public sector executives as follows: In central government ministries and subordinated agencies, the two first administrative levels were covered; when deemed necessary due to policy relevance, also third levels were addressed. Local government and service delivery levels were excluded. In the policy areas of employment and health in particular, as the project’s special focus areas, regional and state government ministries and agencies were also included if relevant – without addressing however direct service delivery levels.
description: Auswahlverfahren Kommentar: Vollerhebung