cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/dt3vte
title: Defense Cooperation Agreement Dataset

description: The Defense Cooperation Agreement Dataset (DCAD) is a comprehensive, human-coded dataset on bilateral defense cooperation agreements (DCAs), covering all independent countries in the international system from 1980 through 2010. DCAs are framework treaties that coordinate and institutionalize routine, day-to-day defense co-operation between signatories. DCAs promote such activities as defense policy coordination, joint military exercises, joint peacekeeping operations, defense-related research and development, joint weapons programs, procurement and arms trade, officer exchanges, joint working groups, etc.
description: Questions and Feedback

The DCA Dataset is hosted by Brandon Kinne, University of California Davis, under the COW Data Hosting Program. In case of questions or concerns concerning the data or coding rules, he may be contacted by email at bkinne@ucdavis.edu.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/kvqplh
title: Minas Gerais Local councillors survey - Brazil

description: Survey of 422 municipal councilors in 44 Brazilian municipalities n all ten planning regions of the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil.
description: See the document "Methodological Notes"
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/4z8zki
title: Italy COVID-19 Case Data with Basemap (STC)

description: Case data from 02-24-2020 to 08-16-2020, this data repository stores COVID-19 virus case data for Italy, including daily case data, summary data, and base map. Each zip file contains weekly case data from Monday to Sunday.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/aez4fn
title: Codes for: Controlling the uncontrollable: Quantum control of open system dynamics

description: These are the codes used for:
"Controlling the uncontrollable: Quantum control of open system dynamics"
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/dtlepk
title: Replication Data for: Dados Dissonâncias Sistêmico-representativas na Relação Congresso-Judiciário:

description: Dados em formato TXT de todos os projetos de lei vinculados à pesquisa CONTROLE EXTERNO DO PODER LEGISLATIVO SOBRE O PODER
JUDICIÁRIO: UM ESTUDO CRÍTICO-DISCURSIVO DA MANUTENÇÃO DO
SALÁRIO DOS(AS) JUÍZES-MINISTROS(AS) DO STF

Artigo apresentado no Econtro Administração da Justiça. Título: Dissonâncias Sistêmico-representativas na Relação Congresso-Judiciário: o Caso do Poder Judiciário Brasileiro na Ordem Democrática Moderna
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/jcn9jv
title: A98_10332.jpg

description: Link to OCHRE database: &lt;a href = 'http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/9b91a4f7-e8a6-5149-56df-97f3e4e11a09'&gt;http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/9b91a4f7-e8a6-5149-56df-97f3e4e11a09
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/rbyket
title: Passed Acts; St. 1843, c.69, SC1/series 229

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Great Massachusetts Petition &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13448109"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13448109&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Georgetown &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 289 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Unidentified signatures: 289 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: George Latimer [note: this data reflects the information on the spreadsheet submitted by Henry I. Bowditch and William F. Channing to the legislature, which was filed with St. 1843, c.69, passed April 26, 1843. The majority of the Great Massachusetts Petition has not been located.] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: St. 1843, c.69, passed April 26, 1843 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/rrv0jz
title: Replication data for: Border Orientation in a Globalizing World

description: Border politics are a salient component of high international politics. States are increasingly building infrastructure to ‘secure’ their borders. We introduce the concept of border orientation to describe the extent to which the State is committed to the spatial display of capacities to control the terms of penetration of its national borders. Border orientation provides a lens through which to analyze resistance to globalization, growing populism, and the consequences of intensified border politics. We measure border orientation using novel, geo-spatial data on the built environment along the world’s borders and theorize that real and perceived pressures of globalization have resulted in more controlling forms of border governance. Empirical evidence supports this claim: states build more along their borders when faced with economic, cultural, and security-based anxieties. Border orientation enhances the study of border politics, complementing the politics of territorial division with a richer politics of liminal securitization and its consequences.
description: This dataset underwent an independent verification process that partially replicated the tables and figures in the primary article. Due to the exactness of the STAN package, complete replication of results was not possible because of minute compute environment and hardware differences. As such, AJPS Editors have granted this manuscript 'partial verification success' in that we were able to run the code and output results that are not substantively different, but are slightly outside the Odum Institute acceptable range for the complete verification success designation. For the supplementary materials, verification was performed solely for the successful execution of code. The verification process was carried out by the Odum Institute for Research in Social Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 

<br>
The associated article has been awarded Open Materials and Open Data Badges. Learn more about the Open Practice Badges from the Center for Open Science.<br>
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ardvul
title: Replication Data for: Does mode of administration impact on quality of data? Comparing a traditional survey versus an online survey via a Voting Advice Application

description: This dataset (in .csv format), accompanying codebook and replication code serve as supplement to a study titled: “Does the mode of administration impact on quality of data? Comparing a traditional survey versus an online survey via a Voting Advice Application” submitted for publication to the journal: “Survey Research Methods”). The study involved comparisons of responses to two near-identical questionnaires administered via a traditional survey and through a Voting Advice Application (VAA) both designed for and administered during the pre-electoral period of the Cypriot Presidential Elections of 2013.

The offline dataset consisted of questionnaires collected from 818 individuals whose participation was elicited through door-to-door stratified random sampling with replacement of individuals who could not be contacted. The strata were designed to take into account the regional population density, gender, age and whether the area was urban or rural. Offline participants completed a pen-and-paper questionnaire version of the VAA in a self-completing capacity, although the person administering the questionnaire remained present throughout.

The online dataset involved responses from 10,241 VAA users who completed the Choose4Cyprus VAA. Voting Advice Applications are online platforms that provide voting recommendations to users based on their closeness to political parties after they declare their agreement or disagreement on a number of policy statements. VAA users freely visited the VAA website and completed the relevant questionnaire in a self-completing capacity.

The two modes of administration (online and offline) involved respondents completing a series of supplementary questions (demographics, ideological affinity & political orientation [e.g. vote in the previous election]) prior to the main questionnaire consisting of 35 and 30 policy-related Likert-type items for the offline and online mode respectively. The dataset includes all 30 policy items that were common between the two modes, although only the first 19 (q1:q19) appeared in the same order and in the same position in the two questionnaires; as such, all analyses reported in the article were conducted using these 19 items only. The phrasing of the questions was identical for the two modes and is described per variable in the attached codebook.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/crv0ip
title: Replication Data for: The Environmental Costs of Civil War: A Synthetic Comparison of the Congolese Forests with and without the Great War of Africa

description: Please download and open the 7z file with 7-zip (https://www.7-zip.org/), and then carefully read the readme.txt file and follow its instruction. I used the 7z file format as Dataverse returns "Upload unsuccessful (504: GATEWAY_TIMEOUT)" error when I tried to upload the file in a zip file format.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/dc7u0a
title: Global Urban Street Networks Node/Edge Lists

description: Global Urban Street Networks Node/Edge Lists
description: OSMnx, 2.0.2
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/jfego
title: Passed Acts; St. 1861, c.91, SC1/series 229, Petition of H.E. Bugbee

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Asking for the repeal of the personal liberty laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10668889"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10668889&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Webster &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Emory Sibley, Webster; committee on the personal liberty laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;H.E. Bugbee&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;John B. Hasler&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Chandler Fay&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;George Tracey&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1861-02-04,1861-02-06 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on February 4, 1861 and referred to the committee on the personal liberty laws and received in the Senate on February 6, 1861 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 193 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 193 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: legal voters, ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: St. 1861, c.91, passed March 25, 1861 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/jgqg4
title: Massachusetts Archives Collection. v.129-Usurpation, 1688-1689. SC1/series 45X, Petition of Samuel Massey

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Support for individuals &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13906034"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13906034&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1688-10-30 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Boston &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Samuel Massey&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: prison keeper of Boston &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Anthony Moore, Anthony More, Virginia, runaway servant, gaol, Edmund Bird, burning, arson, Indians, Garrat Bowman, Mathias Wolmdrof, Catherine Hartman, Matthew Darby, Captain Joseph Smith &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Massachusetts Archives volume 129, pages 260-260a &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/mrdqon
title: Replication data for: The Myth of Consociationalism? Conflict Reduction in Divided Societies

description: Although advocates of consociationalism have asserted that there is solid empirical evidence supporting the use of power-sharing institutions in divided societies, previous quantitative tests of these theories suffer from serious data limitations and fail to take into account the conditional nature of institu- tional effects.The authors test the effect of (a) proportional representation (PR) over majoritarian electoral rules, (b) parliamentary over presidential or semipresidential arrangements, and (c) a federal over a unitary system in reducing conflict in a cross-country data set of 101 countries representing 106 regimes.The results undercut much of the previous empirical support for consociationalist arrangements in divided societies. Using a multiplicative specification, the authors find that PR and parliamentarism appear to exacer- bate political violence when ethnic fractionalization is high, though the effect of federalism is less certain.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ya0eys
title: Replication Data for: How Social Infrastructure Saves Lives: A Quantitative Analysis of Japan’s 3/11 Disasters

description: Observers have long debated how societies should invest resources to safeguard citizens and property, especially in the face of increasing shocks and crises. This article explores how social infrastructure -the spaces and places that help build and maintain social ties and trust, allowing societies to coordinate behavior -plays an important role in our communities, especially in mitigating and recovering from shocks. An analysis of quantitative data on more than 550 neighborhoods across the three Japanese prefectures most affected by the tsunami of 11 March 2011 shows that, controlling for relevant factors, community centers, libraries, parks, and other social infrastructure measurably and cheaply reduced mortality rates among the most vulnerable population. Investing in social infrastructure projects would, based on this data, save more lives during a natural hazard than putting the same money into standard, gray infrastructure such as seawalls.Decision makers at national, regional, and local levels should expand spending on facilities such as libraries, community centers, social businesses, and public parks to increase resilience to multiple types of shocks and to further enhance the quality of life for residents.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/mkobet
title: Replication Data for: Public Support for Latin American Presidents: The Cyclical Model in Comparative Perspective

description: These files support the study above published in Research and Politics
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/olqhj
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1860, rejected, SC1/series 230, Petition of Gilbert Walker

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Support for individuals &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13906086"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13906086&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1860-02-01 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Worcester &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Dexter F. Parker, Worcester; committee on claims &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Gilbert Walker&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1860-02-04,1860-02-04 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on February 4, 1860 and referred to the committee on claims and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on February 4, 1860 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Males of color signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: husband, [males of color] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Sarah B. Walker, minor daughter, Sarah Ellen, Phillips family, Hassanamisco, Grafton, insane, insanity, Worcester county, house keeper, board, expenses, resolution, probate, [additional documents in folder include certification that Sarah B. Walker was committed to the State Lunatic Hospital in Worcester on April 18, 1855 and had been under daily care and observation since that date, correspondence of Gilbert Walker on presenting the petition, and receipts of payments to State Lunatic Hospital] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1860, rejected &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/dswehf
title: A87_1593c.jpg

description: Link to OCHRE database: &lt;a href = 'http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/e0521b00-e39b-cf95-fccd-93a3be3ed05c'&gt;http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/e0521b00-e39b-cf95-fccd-93a3be3ed05c
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/h3xpci
title: Replication data for: Multidimensional Analysis of Roll Call Data via Bayesian Simulation: Identification, Estimation, Inference, and Model Checking

description: Vote-specific parameters are often by-products of roll call analysis, the primary goal being the measurement of legislators’ ideal points. But these vote-specific parameters are more important in higher-dimensional settings: prior restrictions on vote parameters help identify the model, and researchers often have prior beliefs about the nature of the dimensions underlying the proposal space. Bayesian methods provide a straightforward and rigorous way for incorporating these prior beliefs into roll call analysis. I demonstrate this by exploiting the close connections among roll call analysis, item–response models, and “full-information” factor analysis. Vote-specific discrimination parameters are equivalent to factor loadings, and as in factor analysis, they (1) enable researchers to discern the substantive content of the recovered dimensions, (2) can be used for assessing dimensionality and model checking, and (3) are an obvious vehicle for introducing and testing researchers’ prior beliefs about the dimensions. Bayesian simulation facilitates these uses of discrimination parameters, by simplifying estimation and inference for the massive number of parameters generated by roll call analysis.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/kcik9d
title: 2021 Democracy Checkup

description: Democracy Checkup surveys gather information about the opinions of Canadians when election campaigns are not activating their interest and/or partisan attitudes, and capture general public opinion about democratic values, public policies, and current issues.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/oj3hje
title: Replication Data for: Experimental Measurement of Misperception in Political Beliefs

description: Recent research suggests widespread misperception about the political views of others. Measuring perceptions often relies on instruments that do not separate uncertainty from inaccuracy. We present new experimental measures of second-order political beliefs. To carefully measure political (mis)perceptions, we have subjects report beliefs as probabilities. To encourage accuracy, we provide micro-incentives for each response. To measure learning, we provide information sequentially about the perception of interest. We illustrate our method by applying it to perceptions of vote choice in the 2016 presidential election. Subjects made inferences about randomly-selected American National Election Study respondents. Before and after receiving information about the other, subjects reported a probabilistic belief about the other's vote. We find that perceptions are less biased than in previous work on second-order beliefs. Accuracy increased most with delivery of party identification and report of a most important problem. We also find evidence of modest egocentric and different-trait bias.