cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.3535/55w-a7q-mwt
title: Paramphistomum Fischoeder, 1901

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/yxy-gqb-4p1
title: Lamellibrachia luymesi van der Land & Nørrevang, 1975

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/y64-6r5-qdt
title: Glossiphonia

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/dc9-rvj-b2x
title: Ascaridia columbae (Gmelin, 1790) Travassos, 1913

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/s3d-76e-mlt
title: Himasthla Dietz, 1909

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3856924_d3
title: MOESM3 of A new method for sequencing the hypervariable Plasmodium falciparum gene var2csa from clinical samples

description: Additional file 3: Nucleotide sequences for the var2csa alleles amplified, in fasta format.
DOI: 10.3535/lv1-tqa-5bw
title: Halocercus Baylis & Daubney, 1925

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/t2p-gxw-1y1
title: Onchocercidae Leiper, 1911

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/6c4-5ww-542
title: Girardia typhlomexicana (Mitchell & Kawakatsu, 1973)

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/pjx-gfm-q9x
title: Phagocata papillifera (Ijima & Kaburaki, 1916)

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/ydw-0mh-vz8
title: Haemopis

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/51b-dvf-fhr
title: Crucigera websteri Benedict, 1887

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/lzy-d26-l5t
title: Crucigera websteri Benedict, 1887

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/ly6-5sf-y3y
title: Tubificoides heterochaetus (Michaelsen, 1926)

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/t8x-w9n-m81
title: Procerodes dohrni Wilhelmi, 1909

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/5nh-4mt-n0k
title: Cephalothrix linearis (Rathke, 1799)

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/kfz-wnk-sjx
title: Streblospio shrubsolii (Buchanan, 1890)

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/sbs-jb9-dgh
title: Perionyx violaceus Horst, 1894

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/zn4-kd5-nvy
title: Poecilochaetus serpens Allen, 1904

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/3vk-rne-cq8
title: Sabella pavonina Savigny, 1822

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/gr1-g5x-8s2
title: Ficopomatus enigmaticus (Fauvel, 1923)

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/bdp-mf5-565
title: Erpobdella

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/d1j-jbd-2kt
title: Piscicola

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.25378/janelia.24239212
title: Manual organelle segmentations (crop65) in near-isotropic, reconstructed volume electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) of interphase HeLa cell (jrc_hela-3)

description: <b>This acquisition is part of the CellMap 2024 Segmentation Challenge</b><br><br>- <b>Challenge DOI:</b> https://doi.org/10.25378/janelia.c.7456966<br><br>- <b>Challenge Website:</b> https://cellmapchallenge.janelia.org/<br><br><b>Annotation description</b>: Dense segmentations of extracellular space in jrc_hela-3 using Amira 3D 2021.1, Classic Segmentation Workroom and the 'Using Amira to manually segment organelles in vEM for machine learning V.3' annotation protocol.<br><br><b>Annotation ID</b>: crop65<br><br><b>Primary Annotator</b>: COSEM Project Team<br><br><b>Annotation protocol</b>: Using Amira to manually segment organelles in vEM for machine learning V.3 (http://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bp2l61rb5vqe/v3)<br><br><b>Software</b>: Amira 3D 2021.1, Classic Segmentation Workroom<br><br><b>Annotated voxel size (nm)</b>: 2 x 2 x 2 (x, y, z)<br><br><b>Annotated data dimensions (µm)</b>: 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.8 (x, y, z)<br><br><b>Annotated data offset (nm)</b>: 4183 x 2491 x 19359 (x, y, z)<br><br><b>Classes annotated</b>: extracellular space<br><br><b>Dataset URL</b>: s3://janelia-cosem-datasets/jrc_hela-3/jrc_hela-3.zarr/recon-1/labels/groundtruth/crop65<br><br><b>Source (EM) dataset ID</b>: jrc_hela-3<br><br><b>Source (EM) voxel size (nm)</b>: 4 x 4 x 3.24 (x, y, z)<br><br><b>Source (EM) data dimensions (µm)</b>: 49.6 x 4 x 38.88 (x, y, z)<br><br><b>Source (EM) DOI</b>: https://doi.org/10.25378/janelia.13114244<br><br><b>Visualization website</b>: https://openorganelle.janelia.org/datasets/jrc_hela-3<br><br><b>Publication:</b> <i>CellMap Segmentation Challenge,</i> 2024.<br><br><b>The CellMap Project Team during this time consisted of:</b> David Ackerman, Davis Bennett, Marley Bryant, Hannah Nguyen, Grace Park, Alyson Petruncio, Alannah Post, Jacquelyn Price, Diana Ramirez, Jeff Rhoades, Rebecca Vorimo, Aubrey Weigel, Marwan Zouinkhi, Yurii Zubov.<br><br><b>The CellMap Project Team Steering Committee during this time consisted of:</b> Misha Ahrens, Christopher Beck, Teng-Leong Chew, Daniel Feliciano, Jan Funke, Harald Hess, Wyatt Korff, Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz, Zhe J. Liu, Kayvon Pedram, Stephan Preibisch, Stephan Saalfeld, Ronald Vale, and Aubrey Weigel.
DOI: 10.25378/janelia.24239212.v1
title: Manual organelle segmentations (crop65) in near-isotropic, reconstructed volume electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) of interphase HeLa cell (jrc_hela-3)

description: <b>This acquisition is part of the CellMap 2024 Segmentation Challenge</b><br><br>- <b>Challenge DOI:</b> https://doi.org/10.25378/janelia.c.7456966<br><br>- <b>Challenge Website:</b> https://cellmapchallenge.janelia.org/<br><br><b>Annotation description</b>: Dense segmentations of extracellular space in jrc_hela-3 using Amira 3D 2021.1, Classic Segmentation Workroom and the 'Using Amira to manually segment organelles in vEM for machine learning V.3' annotation protocol.<br><br><b>Annotation ID</b>: crop65<br><br><b>Primary Annotator</b>: COSEM Project Team<br><br><b>Annotation protocol</b>: Using Amira to manually segment organelles in vEM for machine learning V.3 (http://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bp2l61rb5vqe/v3)<br><br><b>Software</b>: Amira 3D 2021.1, Classic Segmentation Workroom<br><br><b>Annotated voxel size (nm)</b>: 2 x 2 x 2 (x, y, z)<br><br><b>Annotated data dimensions (µm)</b>: 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.8 (x, y, z)<br><br><b>Annotated data offset (nm)</b>: 4183 x 2491 x 19359 (x, y, z)<br><br><b>Classes annotated</b>: extracellular space<br><br><b>Dataset URL</b>: s3://janelia-cosem-datasets/jrc_hela-3/jrc_hela-3.zarr/recon-1/labels/groundtruth/crop65<br><br><b>Source (EM) dataset ID</b>: jrc_hela-3<br><br><b>Source (EM) voxel size (nm)</b>: 4 x 4 x 3.24 (x, y, z)<br><br><b>Source (EM) data dimensions (µm)</b>: 49.6 x 4 x 38.88 (x, y, z)<br><br><b>Source (EM) DOI</b>: https://doi.org/10.25378/janelia.13114244<br><br><b>Visualization website</b>: https://openorganelle.janelia.org/datasets/jrc_hela-3<br><br><b>Publication:</b> <i>CellMap Segmentation Challenge,</i> 2024.<br><br><b>The CellMap Project Team during this time consisted of:</b> David Ackerman, Davis Bennett, Marley Bryant, Hannah Nguyen, Grace Park, Alyson Petruncio, Alannah Post, Jacquelyn Price, Diana Ramirez, Jeff Rhoades, Rebecca Vorimo, Aubrey Weigel, Marwan Zouinkhi, Yurii Zubov.<br><br><b>The CellMap Project Team Steering Committee during this time consisted of:</b> Misha Ahrens, Christopher Beck, Teng-Leong Chew, Daniel Feliciano, Jan Funke, Harald Hess, Wyatt Korff, Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz, Zhe J. Liu, Kayvon Pedram, Stephan Preibisch, Stephan Saalfeld, Ronald Vale, and Aubrey Weigel.
DOI: 10.3535/cdd-0bc-9sq
title: Polycelis Ehrenberg, 1831

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/13m-8t6-5pd
title: Drepanophorus rubrostriatus Hubrecht, 1875

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/w6j-sea-47e
title: Erpobdella

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/a1s-1m1-wbk
title: Lineus longissimus (Gunnerus, 1770)

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/ld4-f4y-tke
title: Hirudinidae

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/1qm-b5y-76y
title: Ascaridia compar (Schrank, 1790) Travassos, 1913

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/re2-yxl-4rz
title: Ficopomatus miamiensis (Treadwell, 1934)

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/0z5-3nq-yk8
title: Cerebratulus gardineri Punnett, 1903

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/wcc-x2m-4nv
title: Alboglossiphonia

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/3aa-xfx-kck
title: Protula tubularia (Montagu, 1803)

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/ytj-f98-022
title: Trichobilharzia filiformis (Szidat, 1938) McMullen & Beaver, 1945

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/py4-ty2-fn8
title: Hydroides fusicola Mörch, 1863

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.3535/v81-033-4ps
title: Phyllodoce maculata (Linnaeus, 1767)

description: Digital Specimen for the physical specimen hosted at Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.28654545.v1
title: Figure 3(a-d).nb from Investigating wave propagation across loosely bonded interfaces in visco-piezo composites with flexoelectricity in LiNbo<sub>3</sub> and AlN

description: This study compares the transference of surface seismic waves at the loosely bonded interface of a visco-piezo composite structure using two materials, lanthanum niobate (LiNbO<sub>3</sub>) and aluminium nitride (AIN). The structure comprises a viscoelastic layer bonded to a piezoelectric substrate, incorporating the flexoelectric effect. The shear response of the upper layer is modelled using three rheological models: Kelvin–Voigt, Maxwell and Newton. An analytical separable variable method is employed to derive complex dispersion relations for both electrically open- and short-circuit conditions. The numerical analysis focuses on the influence of key parameters, such as bonding conditions and interfacial parameters, on phase velocity and attenuation coefficients in both materials. Results indicate that AIN shows higher phase velocities, while LiNbO<sub>3</sub> demonstrates a stronger impact on attenuation, particularly in the Kelvin–Voigt model. In addition, the flexoelectric effect significantly alters the wave behaviour in both materials, impacting both phase velocity and attenuation. This comparison reveals important differences in wave propagation behaviour, which is crucial for the development of devices like sensors, actuators and energy harvesters. The study offers new insights into piezo-flexo coupling and its potential applications in advanced piezoelectric systems.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.28654548
title: Figure 11 b and d.nb from Investigating wave propagation across loosely bonded interfaces in visco-piezo composites with flexoelectricity in LiNbo<sub>3</sub> and AlN

description: This study compares the transference of surface seismic waves at the loosely bonded interface of a visco-piezo composite structure using two materials, lanthanum niobate (LiNbO<sub>3</sub>) and aluminium nitride (AIN). The structure comprises a viscoelastic layer bonded to a piezoelectric substrate, incorporating the flexoelectric effect. The shear response of the upper layer is modelled using three rheological models: Kelvin–Voigt, Maxwell and Newton. An analytical separable variable method is employed to derive complex dispersion relations for both electrically open- and short-circuit conditions. The numerical analysis focuses on the influence of key parameters, such as bonding conditions and interfacial parameters, on phase velocity and attenuation coefficients in both materials. Results indicate that AIN shows higher phase velocities, while LiNbO<sub>3</sub> demonstrates a stronger impact on attenuation, particularly in the Kelvin–Voigt model. In addition, the flexoelectric effect significantly alters the wave behaviour in both materials, impacting both phase velocity and attenuation. This comparison reveals important differences in wave propagation behaviour, which is crucial for the development of devices like sensors, actuators and energy harvesters. The study offers new insights into piezo-flexo coupling and its potential applications in advanced piezoelectric systems.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.28654548.v1
title: Figure 11 b and d.nb from Investigating wave propagation across loosely bonded interfaces in visco-piezo composites with flexoelectricity in LiNbo<sub>3</sub> and AlN

description: This study compares the transference of surface seismic waves at the loosely bonded interface of a visco-piezo composite structure using two materials, lanthanum niobate (LiNbO<sub>3</sub>) and aluminium nitride (AIN). The structure comprises a viscoelastic layer bonded to a piezoelectric substrate, incorporating the flexoelectric effect. The shear response of the upper layer is modelled using three rheological models: Kelvin–Voigt, Maxwell and Newton. An analytical separable variable method is employed to derive complex dispersion relations for both electrically open- and short-circuit conditions. The numerical analysis focuses on the influence of key parameters, such as bonding conditions and interfacial parameters, on phase velocity and attenuation coefficients in both materials. Results indicate that AIN shows higher phase velocities, while LiNbO<sub>3</sub> demonstrates a stronger impact on attenuation, particularly in the Kelvin–Voigt model. In addition, the flexoelectric effect significantly alters the wave behaviour in both materials, impacting both phase velocity and attenuation. This comparison reveals important differences in wave propagation behaviour, which is crucial for the development of devices like sensors, actuators and energy harvesters. The study offers new insights into piezo-flexo coupling and its potential applications in advanced piezoelectric systems.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.28654551
title: Figure 11 a and c.nb from Investigating wave propagation across loosely bonded interfaces in visco-piezo composites with flexoelectricity in LiNbo<sub>3</sub> and AlN

description: This study compares the transference of surface seismic waves at the loosely bonded interface of a visco-piezo composite structure using two materials, lanthanum niobate (LiNbO<sub>3</sub>) and aluminium nitride (AIN). The structure comprises a viscoelastic layer bonded to a piezoelectric substrate, incorporating the flexoelectric effect. The shear response of the upper layer is modelled using three rheological models: Kelvin–Voigt, Maxwell and Newton. An analytical separable variable method is employed to derive complex dispersion relations for both electrically open- and short-circuit conditions. The numerical analysis focuses on the influence of key parameters, such as bonding conditions and interfacial parameters, on phase velocity and attenuation coefficients in both materials. Results indicate that AIN shows higher phase velocities, while LiNbO<sub>3</sub> demonstrates a stronger impact on attenuation, particularly in the Kelvin–Voigt model. In addition, the flexoelectric effect significantly alters the wave behaviour in both materials, impacting both phase velocity and attenuation. This comparison reveals important differences in wave propagation behaviour, which is crucial for the development of devices like sensors, actuators and energy harvesters. The study offers new insights into piezo-flexo coupling and its potential applications in advanced piezoelectric systems.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.28654551.v1
title: Figure 11 a and c.nb from Investigating wave propagation across loosely bonded interfaces in visco-piezo composites with flexoelectricity in LiNbo<sub>3</sub> and AlN

description: This study compares the transference of surface seismic waves at the loosely bonded interface of a visco-piezo composite structure using two materials, lanthanum niobate (LiNbO<sub>3</sub>) and aluminium nitride (AIN). The structure comprises a viscoelastic layer bonded to a piezoelectric substrate, incorporating the flexoelectric effect. The shear response of the upper layer is modelled using three rheological models: Kelvin–Voigt, Maxwell and Newton. An analytical separable variable method is employed to derive complex dispersion relations for both electrically open- and short-circuit conditions. The numerical analysis focuses on the influence of key parameters, such as bonding conditions and interfacial parameters, on phase velocity and attenuation coefficients in both materials. Results indicate that AIN shows higher phase velocities, while LiNbO<sub>3</sub> demonstrates a stronger impact on attenuation, particularly in the Kelvin–Voigt model. In addition, the flexoelectric effect significantly alters the wave behaviour in both materials, impacting both phase velocity and attenuation. This comparison reveals important differences in wave propagation behaviour, which is crucial for the development of devices like sensors, actuators and energy harvesters. The study offers new insights into piezo-flexo coupling and its potential applications in advanced piezoelectric systems.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.28654554
title: Figure 9 (a-d).nb from Investigating wave propagation across loosely bonded interfaces in visco-piezo composites with flexoelectricity in LiNbo<sub>3</sub> and AlN

description: This study compares the transference of surface seismic waves at the loosely bonded interface of a visco-piezo composite structure using two materials, lanthanum niobate (LiNbO<sub>3</sub>) and aluminium nitride (AIN). The structure comprises a viscoelastic layer bonded to a piezoelectric substrate, incorporating the flexoelectric effect. The shear response of the upper layer is modelled using three rheological models: Kelvin–Voigt, Maxwell and Newton. An analytical separable variable method is employed to derive complex dispersion relations for both electrically open- and short-circuit conditions. The numerical analysis focuses on the influence of key parameters, such as bonding conditions and interfacial parameters, on phase velocity and attenuation coefficients in both materials. Results indicate that AIN shows higher phase velocities, while LiNbO<sub>3</sub> demonstrates a stronger impact on attenuation, particularly in the Kelvin–Voigt model. In addition, the flexoelectric effect significantly alters the wave behaviour in both materials, impacting both phase velocity and attenuation. This comparison reveals important differences in wave propagation behaviour, which is crucial for the development of devices like sensors, actuators and energy harvesters. The study offers new insights into piezo-flexo coupling and its potential applications in advanced piezoelectric systems.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.28654554.v1
title: Figure 9 (a-d).nb from Investigating wave propagation across loosely bonded interfaces in visco-piezo composites with flexoelectricity in LiNbo<sub>3</sub> and AlN

description: This study compares the transference of surface seismic waves at the loosely bonded interface of a visco-piezo composite structure using two materials, lanthanum niobate (LiNbO<sub>3</sub>) and aluminium nitride (AIN). The structure comprises a viscoelastic layer bonded to a piezoelectric substrate, incorporating the flexoelectric effect. The shear response of the upper layer is modelled using three rheological models: Kelvin–Voigt, Maxwell and Newton. An analytical separable variable method is employed to derive complex dispersion relations for both electrically open- and short-circuit conditions. The numerical analysis focuses on the influence of key parameters, such as bonding conditions and interfacial parameters, on phase velocity and attenuation coefficients in both materials. Results indicate that AIN shows higher phase velocities, while LiNbO<sub>3</sub> demonstrates a stronger impact on attenuation, particularly in the Kelvin–Voigt model. In addition, the flexoelectric effect significantly alters the wave behaviour in both materials, impacting both phase velocity and attenuation. This comparison reveals important differences in wave propagation behaviour, which is crucial for the development of devices like sensors, actuators and energy harvesters. The study offers new insights into piezo-flexo coupling and its potential applications in advanced piezoelectric systems.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.28654557
title: Figure 5 (a-d).nb from Investigating wave propagation across loosely bonded interfaces in visco-piezo composites with flexoelectricity in LiNbo<sub>3</sub> and AlN

description: This study compares the transference of surface seismic waves at the loosely bonded interface of a visco-piezo composite structure using two materials, lanthanum niobate (LiNbO<sub>3</sub>) and aluminium nitride (AIN). The structure comprises a viscoelastic layer bonded to a piezoelectric substrate, incorporating the flexoelectric effect. The shear response of the upper layer is modelled using three rheological models: Kelvin–Voigt, Maxwell and Newton. An analytical separable variable method is employed to derive complex dispersion relations for both electrically open- and short-circuit conditions. The numerical analysis focuses on the influence of key parameters, such as bonding conditions and interfacial parameters, on phase velocity and attenuation coefficients in both materials. Results indicate that AIN shows higher phase velocities, while LiNbO<sub>3</sub> demonstrates a stronger impact on attenuation, particularly in the Kelvin–Voigt model. In addition, the flexoelectric effect significantly alters the wave behaviour in both materials, impacting both phase velocity and attenuation. This comparison reveals important differences in wave propagation behaviour, which is crucial for the development of devices like sensors, actuators and energy harvesters. The study offers new insights into piezo-flexo coupling and its potential applications in advanced piezoelectric systems.