cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.7303/syn2768356
title: Crossvalidation Submissions
DOI: 10.7303/syn2507869
title: AD Dream Challenge
DOI: 10.7303/syn2503109
title: AD Challenge Writeup Template
DOI: 10.7303/syn2247600.1
title: H9.112.5.10.fastq
DOI: 10.7303/syn2770164
title: AD challenge submission
DOI: 10.7303/syn2853594
title: DREAM3 - In Silico Network Challenge
DOI: 10.7303/syn6376
title: Bruce
DOI: 10.7303/syn2642523
title: BonneLuxSubmission
DOI: 10.7303/syn3157598
title: NCI Up for a Challenge (U4C) - STAGING
DOI: 10.7303/syn3219180
title: PLOS ONE  - Haralambieva et. al. 2015
DOI: 10.7303/syn2759792
title: CommonMind Consortium DataReleasePortal
DOI: 10.7303/syn3207199
title: registration_evaluation_surfaces_2010
DOI: 10.7303/syn3243404
title: FAB CVL Lectin Microarray Profiling
DOI: 10.7303/syn2343195
title: Synodos
DOI: 10.7303/syn3499927
title: TreeOfCells
DOI: 10.7303/syn2813558
title: Prostate Cancer DREAM Challenge
DOI: 10.7303/syn3880435
title: INDIGO approach from Chandrasekaran et al
DOI: 10.7303/syn3856838
title: Dream Challenge Ofaction
DOI: 10.7303/syn3383106
title: Crowdsourcing the estimation of cognitive decline and resilience in Alzheimers disease - Manuscript supplemental information
DOI: 10.7303/syn3280809
title: Datasets for Use in Rheumatoid Arthritis
DOI: 10.7303/syn4212383
title: In Silico Neuroscience 2015
DOI: 10.7303/syn4125688
title: 1000genomes_phase3_selection
DOI: 10.7303/syn4216890
title: Multilevel map topology
DOI: 10.7303/syn2838779
title: AD Challenge Writeup  (ATeam with Organizers)
DOI: 10.7303/syn2873386
title: Prize4Life ALS Stratification Challenge
DOI: 10.7303/syn2790911
title: AddNeuroMed Knowledge Portal
DOI: 10.7303/syn3686237
title: codes
DOI: 10.7303/syn3541044
title: NCI_60_Data
DOI: 10.7303/syn2805267
title: Deep Parkinson Leukocyte Transcriptome
DOI: 10.7303/syn4214500
title: Jayhawks - Prostate Dream Challenge
DOI: 10.7303/syn2813581
title: SMC-Het
DOI: 10.7303/syn4707464
title: Prostate Cancer DREAM Challenge (forPro)
DOI: 10.7303/syn4650615
title: BAM Files
DOI: 10.7303/syn4808480
title: TRAINING_SET
DOI: 10.7303/syn2289125
title: Protein Turnover in Mouse Hearts
DOI: 10.7303/syn3577463
title: EntirelyEmptyProject
DOI: 10.7303/syn4959973
title: Progression prediction on ALS patients using data provided by ProAct Database
DOI: 10.7303/syn4993293
title: mPower Public Researcher Portal
DOI: 10.7303/syn4957270
title: 2015 DREAM Conference Hackathon
DOI: 10.7303/syn5570798
title: CHO bibliome
DOI: 10.7303/syn5587589
title: BenTestPublicProject
DOI: 10.7303/syn5587591
title: testFile.txt
DOI: 10.7303/syn4164376
title: ROSMAP RNAseq BAM files
DOI: 10.7303/syn3157325
title: ROSMAP genotype data
DOI: 10.15468/dl.r5yfsy
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 5403185 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "TaxonKey" : [
 "is one of (Tupaia glis (Diard, 1820), Myotis myotis (Borkhausen, 1797), Panthera tigris (Linnaeus, 1758), Panthera pardus (Linnaeus, 1758), Macaca mulatta (Zimmermann, 1780), Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758, Felis chaus Schreber, 1777, Cuon alpinus (Pallas, 1811), Hylobates lar (Linnaeus, 1771), Hipposideros fulvus Gray, 1838, Cynopterus brachyotis (Müller, 1838), Semnopithecus entellus (Dufresne, 1797), Macaca radiata (É.Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1812), Gazella bennettii (Sykes, 1831), Macaca nemestrina (Linnaeus, 1766), Tadarida brasiliensis (I.Geoffroy, 1824), Tylonycteris pachypus (Temminck, 1840), Nasalis larvatus (van Wurmb, 1787), Hylobates moloch (Audebert, 1798), Hylobates muelleri Martin, 1841, Prionailurus bengalensis (Kerr, 1792), Canis lupus Linnaeus, 1758, Capra sibirica (Pallas, 1776), Cervus elaphus Linnaeus, 1758, Macaca arctoides (I.Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1831), Gazella subgutturosa (Güldenstaedt, 1780), Capra ibex Linnaeus, 1758, Felis silvestris Schreber, 1777, Hylobates pileatus Gray, 1861, Hylobates agilis F.Cuvier, 1821, Mustela erminea Linnaeus, 1758, Crocidura russula (Hermann, 1780), Ovibos moschatus (Zimmermann, 1780), Panthera leo (Linnaeus, 1758), Cervus nippon Temminck, 1838, Myotis daubentonii (Kuhl, 1817), Macaca fuscata (Blyth, 1875), Rousettus aegyptiacus (E.Geoffroy, 1810), Acinonyx jubatus (Schreber, 1775), Loris lydekkerianus Cabrera, 1908, Gazella dorcas (Linnaeus, 1758), Alces alces (Linnaeus, 1758), Lynx lynx (Linnaeus, 1758), Mustela nivalis Linnaeus, 1766, Glaucomys volans (Linnaeus, 1758), Erinaceus europaeus Linnaeus, 1758, Canis familiaris Linnaeus, 1758, Plecotus auritus (Linnaeus, 1758), Felis bieti Milne-Edwards, 1892, Tachyglossus aculeatus (Shaw, 1792), Hypsignathus monstrosus H.Allen, 1861, Oryctolagus cuniculus (Linnaeus, 1758), Sorex minutus Linnaeus, 1766, Lepus tibetanus Waterhouse, 1841, Ochotona rufescens (Gray, 1842), Diceros bicornis (Linnaeus, 1758), Equus zebra Linnaeus, 1758, Sciurus carolinensis Gmelin, 1788, Syncerus caffer (Sparrman, 1779), Rangifer tarandus (Linnaeus, 1758), Mesocricetus auratus (Waterhouse, 1839), Aepyceros melampus (Lichtenstein, 1812), Crocuta crocuta (Erxleben, 1777), Loxodonta africana (Blumenbach, 1797), Dama dama (Linnaeus, 1758), Phodopus campbelli (Thomas, 1905), Connochaetes taurinus (Burchell, 1823), Lagurus lagurus (Pallas, 1773), Erythrocebus patas (Schreber, 1774), Dendrolagus lumholtzi Collett, 1884, Pan troglodytes (Blumenbach, 1775), Thylogale billardierii (Desmarest, 1822), Bison bison (Linnaeus, 1758), Lynx rufus (Schreber, 1777), Procavia capensis (Pallas, 1766))"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 5403185 records from 7273 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0022616-250127130748423/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.25574/44327
title: Chandra X-ray Observatory ObsId 44327
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6552-1
title: Conservative Party Representatives Study, 2002
title: CPRS 2002; A Multi-Focus, Quantitative Analysis of the Beliefs, Behaviour and Background of Conservative Party Politicians

description: The &lt;i&gt;Conservative Party Representatives Study 2002&lt;/i&gt; is a multi-focus, wholly quantitative analysis of the attitudes, beliefs, behaviour and socio-demographic background of Conservative Party politicians in 2002. A 20-page questionnaire was sent in April 2002 to all Conservative Members of Parliament (MPs), Peers, Members of the European Parliament (MEPs), Scottish MPs, Welsh and Greater London Assembly members, local councillors in Scotland and Wales and a 10 per cent random sample of local councillors in England. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; The survey covered a range of topics under the headings: United Kingdom; environment; business, labour relations, welfare and the economy; Britain, Europe and the wider world; ethnicity, citizenship and national image; society and culture; conduct of politics; the political parties; religion; and the 2001 Conservative Party leadership contest. There are a small number of experiential items for all respondents and a larger battery of socio-demographic items for local councillors in England. Although they can be used as such, a large proportion of attitudinal items are primarily intended as components of valid and statistically reliable, multi-item scales. These items and scales are designed to determine differences, associations and/or predictors of attitudes, behaviour and socio-demographic background in a range of subject areas covered by a series of thematic chapters.&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6553-1
title: Northern Ireland General Election Attitudes Survey, 2010
title: Northern Ireland General Election Attitudes Surveys, 2010-
title: Westminster Election in Northern Ireland Survey, 2010

description: The 2010 General Election represented the first opportunity for Northern Ireland's (NI) voters to express their political preferences in a non-European election since the formation of a power-sharing devolved government in 2007, headed by the Democratic Unionist Party and Sinn Fein. The &lt;i&gt;Northern Ireland General Election Attitudes Survey, 2010&lt;/i&gt; examines the NI electorate's views of the 2010 election and explores different possible scenarios, such as:&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;thawing of the sectarian divide between Protestant-British Unionists and Catholic-Irish nationalists&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;movement away from the main ethnic blocs by voters who may support cross-community parties such as Alliance or the Greens&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;the utility of the joint 'Ulster Unionist-Conservative Party' label of Unionism's second largest party&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;the impact of Sinn Fein's new political approach, with the party supporting the Police Service of Northern Ireland since 2007&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;The survey provides vital evidence on the demographics of party support, the perceptions of parties and the views of the performance of the Northern Ireland Assembly and Executive. The survey also tests the electorate’s perception of the threat posed by 'dissident' republicans.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Further information can be found on the &lt;a href="http://www.esrc.ac.uk/my-esrc/grants/RES-000-22-4033/read" title ="2010 Northern Ireland General Election"&gt; 2010 Northern Ireland General Election&lt;/a&gt; ESRC award web page. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Users are advised that the UK Data Archive holds the &lt;i&gt;British Election Study&lt;/i&gt; series (available under GN 33066) which explores electoral behaviour in Great Britain.&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6554-1
title: Higher Education Institution Knowledge and its Impact on Regional Competitiveness, 2009

description: This project focused on a regional comparison of university knowledge flows to the business community and other institutions both within and external to the region in which particular universities are based. It analyses the impact of university knowledge in relation to the type of knowledge, the flow mechanisms, and the types of actors 'receiving' this knowledge. The key aim of the study was to assess and analyse the impact of Higher Education Institution (HEI) generated knowledge on the competitiveness of those regions within which respective HEIs are located within the twelve UK regions. The study focused on a regional comparison of HEI knowledge flows to the business community and other institutions both within and external to the region in which particular HEIs are based. It analysed the impact of HEI knowledge in relation to the type of knowledge, the flow mechanisms, and the types of actors 'receiving' this knowledge. As well as drawing comparisons across the twelve UK regions, further comparison was made at an international level. The methodological design was utilised not only for the UK regions but also in a parallel US study with partners from the Regional Development Institute (RDI) at Northern Illinois University. The data held at the UK Data Archive comprise the results of a postal survey of knowledge 'receiver' firms that collaborate with UK HEIs.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; Further information about the project may be found on the ESRC &lt;a href="http://www.esrc.ac.uk/my-esrc/grants/RES-171-25-0023-A/read" title="Higher Education Institution Knowledge and its Impact on Regional Competitiveness"&gt;Higher Education Institution Knowledge and its Impact on Regional Competitiveness&lt;/a&gt; award webpage.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6555-1
title: Experiences and Aspirations of Final-Year Undergraduate Students, 2008-2009
title: Who is Studying Science? An Analysis of Patterns in the Recruitment, Training and Employment of Scientists

description: This is a mixed methods data collection.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; The primary purpose of this study was to examine patterns of participation in post-compulsory science and science-related programmes. The data held at the UK Data Archive comprises a set of semi-structured interviews (13 individual interviews and one focus group interview) conducted with undergraduates in various disciplines, and a quantitative survey of the higher education (HE) experience of undergraduate scientists and the reasons they give for choosing, or not choosing, to follow a career in the Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) field. The research project sought to address three broad research questions:&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;What are the long-term patterns of participation in post-compulsory science and science-related courses in the UK?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;To what extent does the undergraduate experience influence students’ decisions to pursue a career in science?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;What happens to science graduates once they leave HE?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;These three questions constitute the study’s three main phases. Phase 1 considered the period up to the start of HE and looked at patterns of participation in the pure sciences at A-level and at applications and admissions to university programmes. Phase 2 included the survey of undergraduate science and non-science students and Phase 3 looked at what happens to science graduates once they leave HE.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; The project also made use of pre-existing data: aggregate data was retrieved from examination boards and government and publicly accessible datasets retrieved from the UK University and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS).&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; Further information may be found on the ESRC &lt;a href="http://www.esrc.ac.uk/my-esrc/grants/RES-000-22-2005/read/" title="Who is studying science? An analysis of patterns in the recruitment, training and employment of scientists"&gt;Who is studying science? An analysis of patterns in the recruitment, training and employment of scientists&lt;/a&gt; award webpage. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6556-1
title: Survey of New Refugees, 2005-2009
title: SNR

description: The Analysis, Research and Knowledge Management section (ARK) within the UK Border Agency commissioned the &lt;i&gt;Survey of New Refugees&lt;/i&gt; to provide a longitudinal study of refugee integration in the UK. The overall aim of the survey was two-fold: (i) to collect information on the characteristics of new refugees at the time of their asylum decision; and (ii) to provide data on the integration of new refugees in the UK over time.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; A postal baseline questionnaire was sent to all new refugees who were granted a positive decision of asylum, humanitarian protection or discretionary leave to remain between 1 December 2005 and 25 March 2007. Three follow-up questionnaires were issued 8, 15 and 21 months later. The baseline questionnaire collected information on the characteristics of refugees at the time of their asylum decision, including their previous education and employment, English language ability, physical and emotional health, and their social support and service needs. Three follow-up questionnaires were used to collect information on how these refugees integrated in the UK over 21 months. Integration was considered in terms of the English language skills, employment and housing of new refugees, and how these changed over time. Over 900 refugees provided information at all four sweeps. The findings of this research have been published in two Home Office Research Reports (Nos. 36 and 37) and one Summary Report (No.35), all included in the study documentation. A further Research Report (No.43), &lt;i&gt;The Migrant Journey&lt;/i&gt;, is also available (see Publications section for references and links).&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6561-1
title: British Crime Survey 2007-2008: Teaching Dataset

description: The &lt;i&gt;British Crime Survey 2007-2008: Teaching Dataset&lt;/i&gt; is based on the &lt;i&gt;British Crime Survey, 2007-2008&lt;/i&gt; (available from the UK Data Archive under SN 6066) and constitutes real data which are used by the Home Office and are behind many headlines. The teaching dataset is a subset, which has been subjected to certain simplifications and additions for the purpose of learning and teaching. (Note that the main &lt;i&gt;British Crime Survey&lt;/i&gt; has now become the &lt;i&gt;Crime Survey for England and Wales&lt;/i&gt;, but titles of older studies in the series remain the same.) &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; The main differences are:&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;only respondents who completed Module B (attitudes to the Criminal Justice System) of the &lt;i&gt;BCS, 2007-2008&lt;/i&gt; are included&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;the number of variables has been reduced&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;weighting has been simplified&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;a reduced codebook is provided&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;additional continuous variables have been created (using factor analysis of pre-existing variables) in order to facilitate their use in quantitative methods classes&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;Further information is available in the study documentation (below) which includes a dataset user guide and additional notes for teachers.&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6563-1
title: Young Lives: Rounds 1 and 2, 2002-2006: Ethiopia: Teaching Dataset

description: The &lt;i&gt;Young Lives: Rounds 1 and 2, 2002-2006: Ethiopia: Teaching Dataset&lt;/i&gt; contains information obtained from all 1,999 participants at Round 1 (one-year-old) and all 1,912 participants at Round 2 (five-years-old) in Ethiopia.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; In total there are 1,942 variables on the dataset taken from the child level data files available as part of the main &lt;i&gt;Young Lives&lt;/i&gt; study (SN 5307). In order to distinguish data from the two rounds a suffix has been added to each variable:&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Round 1 (one-year-olds): _et1 &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Round 2 (five-year-olds): _et5&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
DOI: 10.15468/dl.6pkmf4
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 611 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "TaxonKey is Capsicum annuum",
 "Country is Sweden",
 "HasCoordinate is true"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 611 records from 5 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0031213-250920141307145/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.25574/44328
title: Chandra X-ray Observatory ObsId 44328
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6567-1
title: Crown Street, 1955-1963

description: This study was generated as part of the project ‘Living standards, social identities and the English working class, 1945-1970’, which aimed to investigate how and why working-class living standards and identities changed between 1945 and 1970. One of its main objectives was to re-analyse those postwar social science datasets that have been influential in the writing of histories and social science studies of working class life.
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6568-1
title: European Company Survey, 2009
title: European Company Survey, 2004-
title: ECS

description: The &lt;I&gt;European Company Surveys&lt;/I&gt; (ECS) are conducted by the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound), an autonomous agency of the European Union, funded from the general budget of the European Commission. The aims of the ECS are to map, assess and quantify information on workplace policies and practices across Europe in a harmonised way and – to a lesser extent – to monitor developments over time. The ECS has been carried out every four years since 2004. It is a questionnaire-based representative sample survey carried out by telephone in the language(s) of the country. Interviews take place with the manager responsible for human resources in the establishment and when possible with an employee representative. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The first ECS (known as the &lt;i&gt;Establishment Survey on Working Time and Work-Life Balance, 2004-2005&lt;/i&gt;, held under SN 5655) covered workplace practices with regard to working time arrangements and work-life balance. The second ECS, carried out in 2009 (SN 6568), looked at different forms of flexibility as well as accompanying human resource management practices and the nature and quality of workplace social dialogue. The third ECS (SN 7735), carried out in spring 2013, looked at practices with regard to work organisation, human resources management, employee participation and social dialogue in European workplaces. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Further information about the ECS can be found on the Eurofound &lt;a href="http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/surveys/european-company-surveys" title ="European Company Surveys"&gt;European Company Surveys&lt;/a&gt; webpages.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
 &lt;I&gt;The second ECS&lt;/I&gt;:&lt;br&gt;
The &lt;i&gt;European Company Survey, 2009&lt;/i&gt; is the second Europe-wide survey of establishments carried out by Eurofound. The 2009 survey focuses on two major themes: flexibility practices in companies and employee participation at the workplace. The 2009 survey covered 30 countries, including the 27 EU Member States, as well as the three candidate countries of Turkey, Macedonia and Croatia. The interviews were carried out in establishments with 10 or more employees, both in the private and public sectors.&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.25574/44333
title: Chandra X-ray Observatory ObsId 44333
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6573-1
title: Comparative Assessment of Environmental, Community and Nutritional Impacts of Consuming Fruit and Vegetables Produced Locally and Overseas, 2004-2008
title: Comparative Merits of Consuming Vegetables Produced Locally and Overseas

description: &lt;p&gt;This is a mixed method data collection. The study is part of the Rural Economy and Land Use (RELU) programme.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;This research tried to answer the question ‘ Which is best: to produce vegetables in the UK, or to import produce from overseas?’. This research answered this question by comparing a range of characteristics of vegetables produced in UK, Spain, Uganda and Kenya. The research team considered a range of issues related to the environment, economy, consumer perception, nutrition and community. From an environmental perspective the research team considered whether fewer greenhouse gases were released from producing food in the UK, or by importing it from overseas. This required them to measure gases released from vegetable fields in the four countries and estimate the gases released during transport from field to final consumer. The research team also considered the nutritional value of fresh imported food, compared with UK produced food which was stored for several months prior to consumption. The research team considered the social and economic advantages of home and overseas produced food, by undertaking a large survey of consumers, and also by working in a more detailed way with three rural case study communities. Finally the research team brought all the results together in one case study site and sought to identify the overall advantages and disadvantages of the home and overseas produced fruit and vegetables.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;The life cycle assessment data were withheld due to their disclosive nature (farm management details).&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Ecological data from this study are available at the &lt;a href="http://data.ceh.ac.uk/metadata/82c541af-a6f8-4bc2-a72c-44912e070073" title="Environmental Information Data Centre"&gt;Environmental Information Data Centre&lt;/a&gt; of the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Further information and documentation for this study may be found through the &lt;a href="https://www.researchcatalogue.esrc.ac.uk/grants/RES-224-25-0044/read" target="_blank"&gt;ESRC Research Catalogue webpage: Comparative Assessment of Environmental, Community &amp; Nutritional Impacts of Consuming Fruit &amp; Vegetables Produced Locally.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;/p&gt;