cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15158167
title: Table 2 in Lower Cretaceous Carbonate Deposits From The Derezna Borehole (Carpatho-Balkanides, Eastern Serbia) And Remarks On Some Dasycladalean Algae

description: Table 2. Comparative dimensions of Similiclypeina aff. somalica from the Reşiţa Moldova Nouă zone (Southern Carpathians, Romania), Kirkaova (Kale-Gmümüshane, NE Turkey), and the specimen from Derezna borehole (Kučaj zone, Carpatho-Balkanides, Eastern Serbia).
Reşiţa- Moldova Nouă zone (Sothern Carpathians, Romania) (Bucur, 1993)Kirkaova (Kale-Gümüshane, NE Turkey) (Bucur et al., 2000)Borehole Derezna (Carpatho-Balkanides, Eastern Serbia) (this paper)D0.36-0.540.35-0.500.45d0.16-0.230.14-0.200.25d/D0.30-0.460.400.55l0.19-0.230.15-0.200.13-0.20p (dist.)0.028-0.100.05-0.100.065-0.11h0.07-0.090.07-0.080.065-0.098
description: Published as part of Bucur, Ioan I., Jovanovic, Divna, Radoicic, Rajka, Sudar, Milan & Mircescu, Cristian Victor, 2021, Lower Cretaceous Carbonate Deposits From The Derezna Borehole (Carpatho-Balkanides, Eastern Serbia) And Remarks On Some Dasycladalean Algae, pp. 6 in Acta Palaeontologica Romaniae 17 (1) on page 6, DOI: 10.35463/j.apr.2021.01.01, http://zenodo.org/record/10520792
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15158168
title: Table 2 in Lower Cretaceous Carbonate Deposits From The Derezna Borehole (Carpatho-Balkanides, Eastern Serbia) And Remarks On Some Dasycladalean Algae

description: Table 2. Comparative dimensions of Similiclypeina aff. somalica from the Reşiţa Moldova Nouă zone (Southern Carpathians, Romania), Kirkaova (Kale-Gmümüshane, NE Turkey), and the specimen from Derezna borehole (Kučaj zone, Carpatho-Balkanides, Eastern Serbia).
Reşiţa- Moldova Nouă zone (Sothern Carpathians, Romania) (Bucur, 1993)Kirkaova (Kale-Gümüshane, NE Turkey) (Bucur et al., 2000)Borehole Derezna (Carpatho-Balkanides, Eastern Serbia) (this paper)D0.36-0.540.35-0.500.45d0.16-0.230.14-0.200.25d/D0.30-0.460.400.55l0.19-0.230.15-0.200.13-0.20p (dist.)0.028-0.100.05-0.100.065-0.11h0.07-0.090.07-0.080.065-0.098
description: Published as part of Bucur, Ioan I., Jovanovic, Divna, Radoicic, Rajka, Sudar, Milan & Mircescu, Cristian Victor, 2021, Lower Cretaceous Carbonate Deposits From The Derezna Borehole (Carpatho-Balkanides, Eastern Serbia) And Remarks On Some Dasycladalean Algae, pp. 6 in Acta Palaeontologica Romaniae 17 (1) on page 6, DOI: 10.35463/j.apr.2021.01.01, http://zenodo.org/record/10520792
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15158169
title: TABLE 1 in Taxonomy and phylogeny of Fusarium houttuyniae and F. liriopes spp. nov. (Hypocreales, Nectriaceae) from China

description: TABLE 1. Names, strain numbers and corresponding GenBank accession numbers of the taxa used in the molecular phylogenetic analyses.
TaxaStrain NumberGenBank accession numbers cmdA rpb2 tef1tub2Fusarium callistephiCBS 187.53TMH484693MH484875MH484966MH485057F. callistephiCBS 115423MH484723MH484905MH484996MH485087F. carminascensCBS 144739MH484752MH484934MH485025MH485116F. carminascensCBS 144740MH484753MH484935MH485026MH485117F. contaminatumCBS 111552MH484718MH484900MH484991MH485082F. cugenangenseCBS 620.72 = DSM 11271 = NRRL 36520MH484697MH484879MH484970MH485061F. cugenangenseCBS 131393MH484746MH484928MH485019MH485110F. curvatumCBS 247.61 = BBA 8398 = DSM 62308 = NRRL 22545MH484694MH484876MH484967MH485058F. curvatumCBS 238.94 = NRRL 26422 = PD 94/184TMH484711MH484893MH484984MH485075F. duoseptatumCBS 102026 = NRRL 36115MH484714MH484896MH484987MH485078F. elaeidisCBS 217.49 = NRRL 36358MH484688MH484870MH484961MH485052F. elaeidisCBS 218.49 = NRRL 36359MH484689MH484871MH484962MH485053F. fabacearumCBS 144742 = CPC 25801MH484756MH484938MH485029MH485120F. fabacearumCBS 144743 = CPC 25802TMH484757MH484939MH485030MH485121F. foetensCBS 120665MH484736MH484918MH485009MH485100F. fredkrugeriCBS 144209LT996181LT996147LT996097LT996117F. glycinesCBS 176.33 = NRRL 36286MH484686MH484868MH484959MH485050F. glycinesCBS 214.49 = NRRL 36356MH484687MH484869MH484960MH485051F. gossypinumCBS 116611MH484725MH484907MH484998MH485089F. gossypinumCBS 116612MH484726MH484908MH484999MH485090F. houttuyniaeHGUP 10007OP621329OP621328OM863574OP378202F. houttuyniaeHGUP 10009OP699670OP699669OP295697OP382472F. hoodiaeCBS 132476MH484748MH484930MH485021MH485112F. hoodiaeCBS 132477MH484749MH484931MH485022MH485113F. languescensCBS 645.78 = NRRL 36531TMH484698MH484880MH484971MH485062F. languescensCBS 646.78 = NRRL 36532MH484699MH484881MH484972MH485063F. libertatisCBS 144748 = CPC 25782MH484750MH484932MH485023MH485114F. libertatisCBS 144747 = CPC 25788MH484751MH484933MH485024MH485115F. liriopesHGUP 10008OP715871OP715872OM863575OP382473F. liriopesHGUP 10010OP726907OP726906OP295698OP413456F. nirenbergiaeCBS 129.24MH484682MH484864MH484955MH485046
......continued on the next page
description: Published as part of He, Yu-Ke, Jayawardena, Ruvishika S., Kakumyan, Pattana & Wang, Yong, 2023, Taxonomy and phylogeny of Fusarium houttuyniae and F. liriopes spp. nov. (Hypocreales, Nectriaceae) from China, pp. 262 in Phytotaxa 603 (3) on page 262, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.603.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/8166719
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15158170
title: TABLE 1 in Taxonomy and phylogeny of Fusarium houttuyniae and F. liriopes spp. nov. (Hypocreales, Nectriaceae) from China

description: TABLE 1. Names, strain numbers and corresponding GenBank accession numbers of the taxa used in the molecular phylogenetic analyses.
TaxaStrain NumberGenBank accession numbers cmdA rpb2 tef1tub2Fusarium callistephiCBS 187.53TMH484693MH484875MH484966MH485057F. callistephiCBS 115423MH484723MH484905MH484996MH485087F. carminascensCBS 144739MH484752MH484934MH485025MH485116F. carminascensCBS 144740MH484753MH484935MH485026MH485117F. contaminatumCBS 111552MH484718MH484900MH484991MH485082F. cugenangenseCBS 620.72 = DSM 11271 = NRRL 36520MH484697MH484879MH484970MH485061F. cugenangenseCBS 131393MH484746MH484928MH485019MH485110F. curvatumCBS 247.61 = BBA 8398 = DSM 62308 = NRRL 22545MH484694MH484876MH484967MH485058F. curvatumCBS 238.94 = NRRL 26422 = PD 94/184TMH484711MH484893MH484984MH485075F. duoseptatumCBS 102026 = NRRL 36115MH484714MH484896MH484987MH485078F. elaeidisCBS 217.49 = NRRL 36358MH484688MH484870MH484961MH485052F. elaeidisCBS 218.49 = NRRL 36359MH484689MH484871MH484962MH485053F. fabacearumCBS 144742 = CPC 25801MH484756MH484938MH485029MH485120F. fabacearumCBS 144743 = CPC 25802TMH484757MH484939MH485030MH485121F. foetensCBS 120665MH484736MH484918MH485009MH485100F. fredkrugeriCBS 144209LT996181LT996147LT996097LT996117F. glycinesCBS 176.33 = NRRL 36286MH484686MH484868MH484959MH485050F. glycinesCBS 214.49 = NRRL 36356MH484687MH484869MH484960MH485051F. gossypinumCBS 116611MH484725MH484907MH484998MH485089F. gossypinumCBS 116612MH484726MH484908MH484999MH485090F. houttuyniaeHGUP 10007OP621329OP621328OM863574OP378202F. houttuyniaeHGUP 10009OP699670OP699669OP295697OP382472F. hoodiaeCBS 132476MH484748MH484930MH485021MH485112F. hoodiaeCBS 132477MH484749MH484931MH485022MH485113F. languescensCBS 645.78 = NRRL 36531TMH484698MH484880MH484971MH485062F. languescensCBS 646.78 = NRRL 36532MH484699MH484881MH484972MH485063F. libertatisCBS 144748 = CPC 25782MH484750MH484932MH485023MH485114F. libertatisCBS 144747 = CPC 25788MH484751MH484933MH485024MH485115F. liriopesHGUP 10008OP715871OP715872OM863575OP382473F. liriopesHGUP 10010OP726907OP726906OP295698OP413456F. nirenbergiaeCBS 129.24MH484682MH484864MH484955MH485046
......continued on the next page
description: Published as part of He, Yu-Ke, Jayawardena, Ruvishika S., Kakumyan, Pattana & Wang, Yong, 2023, Taxonomy and phylogeny of Fusarium houttuyniae and F. liriopes spp. nov. (Hypocreales, Nectriaceae) from China, pp. 262 in Phytotaxa 603 (3) on page 262, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.603.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/8166719
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15158171
title: TABLE 2 in Taxonomy and phylogeny of Fusarium houttuyniae and F. liriopes spp. nov. (Hypocreales, Nectriaceae) from China

description: TABLE 2. The differences of DNA base pair differences in different gene regions between our strains and closely related taxa.
SpeciesStrain numbercmdA (1–606)rpb2 (607–1483)tef1 (1484–2105)tub2 (2106-2640)Fusarium houttuyniaeGUCC 210040000F. liriopesGUCC 2100561110F. nirenbergiaeCBS 129.2442712F. liriopesGUCC 210050000F. nirenbergiaeCBS 129.247283
The new isolates are in bold.
description: Published as part of He, Yu-Ke, Jayawardena, Ruvishika S., Kakumyan, Pattana & Wang, Yong, 2023, Taxonomy and phylogeny of Fusarium houttuyniae and F. liriopes spp. nov. (Hypocreales, Nectriaceae) from China, pp. 263 in Phytotaxa 603 (3) on page 263, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.603.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/8166719
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15158172
title: TABLE 2 in Taxonomy and phylogeny of Fusarium houttuyniae and F. liriopes spp. nov. (Hypocreales, Nectriaceae) from China

description: TABLE 2. The differences of DNA base pair differences in different gene regions between our strains and closely related taxa.
SpeciesStrain numbercmdA (1–606)rpb2 (607–1483)tef1 (1484–2105)tub2 (2106-2640)Fusarium houttuyniaeGUCC 210040000F. liriopesGUCC 2100561110F. nirenbergiaeCBS 129.2442712F. liriopesGUCC 210050000F. nirenbergiaeCBS 129.247283
The new isolates are in bold.
description: Published as part of He, Yu-Ke, Jayawardena, Ruvishika S., Kakumyan, Pattana & Wang, Yong, 2023, Taxonomy and phylogeny of Fusarium houttuyniae and F. liriopes spp. nov. (Hypocreales, Nectriaceae) from China, pp. 263 in Phytotaxa 603 (3) on page 263, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.603.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/8166719
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15158173
title: TABLE 3 in Taxonomy and phylogeny of Fusarium houttuyniae and F. liriopes spp. nov. (Hypocreales, Nectriaceae) from China

description: TABLE 3. The comparison of morphological characteristics of new species and closely related members.
SpeciesStrain numberSeptation of conidiaSize of conidia (µm) 1-septate 2-septate3-septateFusarium houttuyniaeGUCC 210041-312‒20 × 2‒515‒22 × 2‒428‒45 × 3‒6F. liriopesGUCC 210050-311‒15 × 2‒314‒22 × 2‒418‒28 × 3‒5F. nirenbergiaeCBS 129. 240-57‒42 × 3.7‒4.3
The new isolates are in bold.
description: Published as part of He, Yu-Ke, Jayawardena, Ruvishika S., Kakumyan, Pattana & Wang, Yong, 2023, Taxonomy and phylogeny of Fusarium houttuyniae and F. liriopes spp. nov. (Hypocreales, Nectriaceae) from China, pp. 263 in Phytotaxa 603 (3) on page 263, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.603.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/8166719
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15158174
title: TABLE 3 in Taxonomy and phylogeny of Fusarium houttuyniae and F. liriopes spp. nov. (Hypocreales, Nectriaceae) from China

description: TABLE 3. The comparison of morphological characteristics of new species and closely related members.
SpeciesStrain numberSeptation of conidiaSize of conidia (µm) 1-septate 2-septate3-septateFusarium houttuyniaeGUCC 210041-312‒20 × 2‒515‒22 × 2‒428‒45 × 3‒6F. liriopesGUCC 210050-311‒15 × 2‒314‒22 × 2‒418‒28 × 3‒5F. nirenbergiaeCBS 129. 240-57‒42 × 3.7‒4.3
The new isolates are in bold.
description: Published as part of He, Yu-Ke, Jayawardena, Ruvishika S., Kakumyan, Pattana & Wang, Yong, 2023, Taxonomy and phylogeny of Fusarium houttuyniae and F. liriopes spp. nov. (Hypocreales, Nectriaceae) from China, pp. 263 in Phytotaxa 603 (3) on page 263, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.603.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/8166719
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15149710
title: Dataset from "Patulin and Xestoquinol are inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase 1"

description: Numerical data used to generate graphs in the manuscript "Patulin and Xestoquinol are inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase 1"
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15149711
title: Dataset from "Patulin and Xestoquinol are inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase 1"

description: Numerical data used to generate graphs in the manuscript "Patulin and Xestoquinol are inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase 1"
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15158175
title: Table 1 in Comparison of the chemical composition of three species of smartweed (genus Persicaria) with a focus on drimane sesquiterpenoids

description: Table 1 Chemical composition of organic extracts of flowers a of three Persicaria species.
CompoundR.I.P. hydropiper flowers b (%)P. minor flowers b (%)P. maculosa flowers b (%)Monoterpenes0.160.090.08Limonene10340.140.060.07Bornyl acetate12620.020.030.01Sesquiterpenes98.3352.7618.65Drimanes78.5729.980.11Polygodial c189276.7125.220.1Isodrimenin20391.270.88n.d.Drimenin19730.584.24n.d.Drimenol17880.01n.d.n.d.Non-drimanes19.7632.7818.54Caryophyllene14326.6512.540.62a- Humulene14685.021.450.81(E)-b- farnesene14543.876.774.26a- Bisabolol16931.361.51n.d.a- Muurolene15071.25n.d.6.29Aristolone17160.710.34n.d.Caryophyllene oxide15970.29n.d.n.d.(E)-b- bergamotene14920.220.120.02b- Bisabolene15130.120.01n.d.(E)-nerolidol15630.09n.d.n.d.(E)-a- bergamotene14390.080.020.01b- Elemene d13970.040.022.86Humulene epoxide II16250.03n.d.n.d.d- Cadinene15230.02n.d.0.03b- Bisabolol16770.01n.d.n.d.b- Selinene1500n.d.n.d.3.64Diterpenes1.3135.8556.14Neophytadiene isomer I18360.8820.6735.07Neophytadiene isomer III18800.38.3914.59Neophytadiene isomer II18610.136.796.48Others0.1911.3225.15Heneicosane e21000.1710.7824.74Dihydro-a- ionone f14190.02n.d.n.d.Nonanal g1105n.d.0.540.41Total abundance (TIC)100100100Relative abundance (TIC)1001.440.84
R.I. = retention index; n.d. = not detected.
a Average of three replicates of each of three developmental stages (N = 3 × 3, Table 3). Standard errors were on average 28% of a given value.
b Relative content as percentage of the total content (sum of TIC peak areas) of a given species. Multiplication of the percentages in each column with the relative abundance of the species yields the relative contents between species.
c Polygodial contains a fraction of 9- epi -polygodial which cannot be estimated reliably by GC–MS.
d b- Elemene is the heat-induced Cope rearrangement product formed from germacrene A in the GC–MS injection path (de Kraker et al., 1998).
e Alkane.
f Carotenoid derivative.
g Fatty acid derivative.
description: Published as part of Prota, N., Mumm, R., Bouwmeester, H. J. & Jongsma, M. A., 2014, Comparison of the chemical composition of three species of smartweed (genus Persicaria) with a focus on drimane sesquiterpenoids, pp. 131 in Phytochemistry 108 on page 131, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.10.001, http://zenodo.org/record/10490544
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15158176
title: Table 1 in Comparison of the chemical composition of three species of smartweed (genus Persicaria) with a focus on drimane sesquiterpenoids

description: Table 1 Chemical composition of organic extracts of flowers a of three Persicaria species.
CompoundR.I.P. hydropiper flowers b (%)P. minor flowers b (%)P. maculosa flowers b (%)Monoterpenes0.160.090.08Limonene10340.140.060.07Bornyl acetate12620.020.030.01Sesquiterpenes98.3352.7618.65Drimanes78.5729.980.11Polygodial c189276.7125.220.1Isodrimenin20391.270.88n.d.Drimenin19730.584.24n.d.Drimenol17880.01n.d.n.d.Non-drimanes19.7632.7818.54Caryophyllene14326.6512.540.62a- Humulene14685.021.450.81(E)-b- farnesene14543.876.774.26a- Bisabolol16931.361.51n.d.a- Muurolene15071.25n.d.6.29Aristolone17160.710.34n.d.Caryophyllene oxide15970.29n.d.n.d.(E)-b- bergamotene14920.220.120.02b- Bisabolene15130.120.01n.d.(E)-nerolidol15630.09n.d.n.d.(E)-a- bergamotene14390.080.020.01b- Elemene d13970.040.022.86Humulene epoxide II16250.03n.d.n.d.d- Cadinene15230.02n.d.0.03b- Bisabolol16770.01n.d.n.d.b- Selinene1500n.d.n.d.3.64Diterpenes1.3135.8556.14Neophytadiene isomer I18360.8820.6735.07Neophytadiene isomer III18800.38.3914.59Neophytadiene isomer II18610.136.796.48Others0.1911.3225.15Heneicosane e21000.1710.7824.74Dihydro-a- ionone f14190.02n.d.n.d.Nonanal g1105n.d.0.540.41Total abundance (TIC)100100100Relative abundance (TIC)1001.440.84
R.I. = retention index; n.d. = not detected.
a Average of three replicates of each of three developmental stages (N = 3 × 3, Table 3). Standard errors were on average 28% of a given value.
b Relative content as percentage of the total content (sum of TIC peak areas) of a given species. Multiplication of the percentages in each column with the relative abundance of the species yields the relative contents between species.
c Polygodial contains a fraction of 9- epi -polygodial which cannot be estimated reliably by GC–MS.
d b- Elemene is the heat-induced Cope rearrangement product formed from germacrene A in the GC–MS injection path (de Kraker et al., 1998).
e Alkane.
f Carotenoid derivative.
g Fatty acid derivative.
description: Published as part of Prota, N., Mumm, R., Bouwmeester, H. J. & Jongsma, M. A., 2014, Comparison of the chemical composition of three species of smartweed (genus Persicaria) with a focus on drimane sesquiterpenoids, pp. 131 in Phytochemistry 108 on page 131, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.10.001, http://zenodo.org/record/10490544
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15158177
title: Table 2 in Comparison of the chemical composition of three species of smartweed (genus Persicaria) with a focus on drimane sesquiterpenoids

description: Table 2 Chemical composition of organic extracts of leaves a of three Persicaria species.
CompoundR.I.P. hydropiper leaves b (%)P. minor leaves b (%)P. maculosa leaves b (%)Monoterpenes0.210.020.02Bornyl acetate12620.01n.d.n.d.Limonene10340.200.020.02Sesquiterpenes67.8511.113.15Drimanes45.124.900.23Polygodial c189244.273.960.23Isodrimenin20390.650.14n.d.Drimenin19730.190.80n.d.Drimenol1788n.d.n.d.n.d.Non-drimanes22.736.212.92(E)-b- farnesene14547.782.751.01a- Humulene14686.200.280.06Caryophyllene14326.102.580.02a- Bisabolol16931.150.41n.d.(E)-nerolidol15630.500.05n.d.(E)-b- bergamotene14920.320.04n.d.Aristolone17160.310.08n.d.Caryophyllene oxide15970.13n.d.n.d.(E)-a- bergamotene14390.110.01n.d.b- Bisabolene15130.05n.d.n.d.b- Elemene d13970.030.010.62a- Muurolene15070.03n.d.0.88Humulene epoxide II16250.02n.d.n.d.b- Bisabolol1677n.d.n.d.n.d.d- Cadinene1523n.d.n.d.n.d.b- Selinene1500n.d.n.d.0.33Diterpenes31.9288.8096.68Neophytadiene isomer I183621.0159.0662.72Neophytadiene isomer III18807.6521.4624.40Neophytadiene isomer II18613.268.289.56Others0.050.090.15Heneicosane e21000.030.060.12Dihydro-a- ionone f14190.01n.d.n.d.Nonanal g11050.010.030.03Total abundance (TIC)100100100Relative abundance (TIC)10034.422.3
R.I. = retention index; n.d. = not detected.
a Average of three replicates of each of four developmental stages (N = 3 × 4, Table 3). Standard errors were on average 28% of a given value.
b Relative content as percentage of the total content (sum of TIC peak areas) of a given species. Multiplication of the percentages in each column with the relative abundance of the species yields the relative contents between species.
c Polygodial contains a fraction of 9- epi -polygodial, which cannot be estimated reliably by GC–MS.
d b- Elemene is the heat-induced Cope rearrangement product formed from germacrene A in the GC–MS injection path (De Kraker et al., 1998).
e Alkane.
f Carotenoid derivative.
g Fatty acid derivative.
description: Published as part of Prota, N., Mumm, R., Bouwmeester, H. J. & Jongsma, M. A., 2014, Comparison of the chemical composition of three species of smartweed (genus Persicaria) with a focus on drimane sesquiterpenoids, pp. 132 in Phytochemistry 108 on page 132, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.10.001, http://zenodo.org/record/10490544
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15158178
title: Table 2 in Comparison of the chemical composition of three species of smartweed (genus Persicaria) with a focus on drimane sesquiterpenoids

description: Table 2 Chemical composition of organic extracts of leaves a of three Persicaria species.
CompoundR.I.P. hydropiper leaves b (%)P. minor leaves b (%)P. maculosa leaves b (%)Monoterpenes0.210.020.02Bornyl acetate12620.01n.d.n.d.Limonene10340.200.020.02Sesquiterpenes67.8511.113.15Drimanes45.124.900.23Polygodial c189244.273.960.23Isodrimenin20390.650.14n.d.Drimenin19730.190.80n.d.Drimenol1788n.d.n.d.n.d.Non-drimanes22.736.212.92(E)-b- farnesene14547.782.751.01a- Humulene14686.200.280.06Caryophyllene14326.102.580.02a- Bisabolol16931.150.41n.d.(E)-nerolidol15630.500.05n.d.(E)-b- bergamotene14920.320.04n.d.Aristolone17160.310.08n.d.Caryophyllene oxide15970.13n.d.n.d.(E)-a- bergamotene14390.110.01n.d.b- Bisabolene15130.05n.d.n.d.b- Elemene d13970.030.010.62a- Muurolene15070.03n.d.0.88Humulene epoxide II16250.02n.d.n.d.b- Bisabolol1677n.d.n.d.n.d.d- Cadinene1523n.d.n.d.n.d.b- Selinene1500n.d.n.d.0.33Diterpenes31.9288.8096.68Neophytadiene isomer I183621.0159.0662.72Neophytadiene isomer III18807.6521.4624.40Neophytadiene isomer II18613.268.289.56Others0.050.090.15Heneicosane e21000.030.060.12Dihydro-a- ionone f14190.01n.d.n.d.Nonanal g11050.010.030.03Total abundance (TIC)100100100Relative abundance (TIC)10034.422.3
R.I. = retention index; n.d. = not detected.
a Average of three replicates of each of four developmental stages (N = 3 × 4, Table 3). Standard errors were on average 28% of a given value.
b Relative content as percentage of the total content (sum of TIC peak areas) of a given species. Multiplication of the percentages in each column with the relative abundance of the species yields the relative contents between species.
c Polygodial contains a fraction of 9- epi -polygodial, which cannot be estimated reliably by GC–MS.
d b- Elemene is the heat-induced Cope rearrangement product formed from germacrene A in the GC–MS injection path (De Kraker et al., 1998).
e Alkane.
f Carotenoid derivative.
g Fatty acid derivative.
description: Published as part of Prota, N., Mumm, R., Bouwmeester, H. J. & Jongsma, M. A., 2014, Comparison of the chemical composition of three species of smartweed (genus Persicaria) with a focus on drimane sesquiterpenoids, pp. 132 in Phytochemistry 108 on page 132, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.10.001, http://zenodo.org/record/10490544
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15158179
title: Table 3 in Comparison of the chemical composition of three species of smartweed (genus Persicaria) with a focus on drimane sesquiterpenoids

description: Table 3 Species-specific content of polygodial a in different tissues.
SpeciesFlowers b Lg g FW — 1Leaves b Lg g FW — 1Persicaria hydropiper6198 ± 820500 ± 38Persicaria minor32 ± 617 ± 6Persicaria maculosa0.07 ± 0.030.7 ± 0.5
a Polygodial contains a fraction of 9- epi -polygodial which cannot be estimated reliably by GC–MS.
b Values with standard error (N = 3).
description: Published as part of Prota, N., Mumm, R., Bouwmeester, H. J. & Jongsma, M. A., 2014, Comparison of the chemical composition of three species of smartweed (genus Persicaria) with a focus on drimane sesquiterpenoids, pp. 133 in Phytochemistry 108 on page 133, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.10.001, http://zenodo.org/record/10490544
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15158180
title: Table 3 in Comparison of the chemical composition of three species of smartweed (genus Persicaria) with a focus on drimane sesquiterpenoids

description: Table 3 Species-specific content of polygodial a in different tissues.
SpeciesFlowers b Lg g FW — 1Leaves b Lg g FW — 1Persicaria hydropiper6198 ± 820500 ± 38Persicaria minor32 ± 617 ± 6Persicaria maculosa0.07 ± 0.030.7 ± 0.5
a Polygodial contains a fraction of 9- epi -polygodial which cannot be estimated reliably by GC–MS.
b Values with standard error (N = 3).
description: Published as part of Prota, N., Mumm, R., Bouwmeester, H. J. & Jongsma, M. A., 2014, Comparison of the chemical composition of three species of smartweed (genus Persicaria) with a focus on drimane sesquiterpenoids, pp. 133 in Phytochemistry 108 on page 133, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.10.001, http://zenodo.org/record/10490544