cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.17632/hsj8wsfz7t.1
title: Regulatory Modules of Human Thermogenic Adipocytes: Functional Genomics of Meta-Analyses Derived Marker-Genes

description: Recently, ProFAT and BATLAS scores have been offered to determine thermogenic status of adipocytes using expression pattern of brown and white marker-genes. In this work, we investigated the functional context of these genes. Although the two meta-analyses based marker-gene lists have little overlap, their enriched pathways show strong coincides suggesting they may better characterize adipocytes. We demonstrate that functional genomics of the annotated genes in common pathways enables an extended analysis of thermogenesis regulation, generates testable hypotheses supported by experimental results in human adipocytes with different browning potential and may lead to more global conclusions than single-state studies. Our results imply that different biological processes shape brown and white adipocytes with presumed transitional states. We propose that the thermogenic adipocyte phenotype require both repression of whitening and induction of browning. These simultaneous actions and hitherto unnoticed regulatory modules, such as the exemplified HIF1A that may directly act at UCP1 promoter, can set new direction in obesity research.
DOI: 10.17632/d2kz276nnt.1
title: LINF_210007500

description: protein of unknown function - conserved; Leishmania infantum (strain JPCM5)
DOI: 10.17632/342hb7n3c5.1
title: Estrogen DNA adduct concentrations from South African Population

description: The DNA adduct metabolites include 4-hydroxyestrone(estradiol)-1-N7-guanine, 4-hydroxyestrone(estradiol)-1-N3-adenine and 2-hydroxyestrone(estradiol)-6-N3-adenine. 
The developed method was validated before urine analysis of Black and White South African females. Concentrations calculated are expressed as ng/mg creatinine.
DOI: 10.17632/89m5vgrg7c.1
title: ZP2 cleavage blocks polyspermy by modulating the architecture of the egg coat. Nishio et al.

description: Original files for the agarose gel, Coomassie gel, western blot and native mass spectrometry data shown in the Nishio et al. manuscript
DOI: 10.17632/5hg29rjtdc.1
title: RNA sequencing CLBL-1 and GL-1 cell lines

description: A transcriptome analysis was performed in two canine hematopoietic cell lines, CLBL-1 (B-cell lymphoma) and GL-1 (B-cell leukemia). RNA was obtained from cultures of the both cell lines during unperturbed growth and sequenced by Novogene (UK).
The cost of this research was financed by the project "UPWR 2.0:international and interdisciplinary programme of development of Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences", co-financed by the European Social Fund under the Operational Program Knowledge Education Development, under contract No. POWR.03.05.00-00-Z062 / 18 of June 4, 2019 and by the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange under Grant No. PPI/APM/2019/1/00044/U/00001
DOI: 10.17632/5xrfg5dym6.1
title: Data: Benchmarking batch correction methods for synthesizing imbalanced microbiome community profiles

description: Batch variation is unwanted variation that plagues syntheses of microbiome sequence data. Batch effects correction algorithms (BECAs) aim to remove batch effects, but most BECAs do not account for a common problem whereby batch covariates of interest are imbalanced (e.g., when classes do not appear in all batches or in even sample proportions). Here we tested five BECAs on eight seed microbiome studies which are prone to severe batch effects due to variable seed handling practices. We compared the performance of BECAs including zero-mean centering (ZMC), Ratio-A, ConQuR, PLSDA, and wPLSDA (developed for imbalanced batch-covariates). We also account for the sparsity and compositionality of microbiome data with zero imputation and center log ratio transformation (CLR). We found 1) using a redundancy analysis, that no method reduced variation explained by the unwanted covariate to zero; 2) ConQuR, Ratio-A, and ZMC removed the magnitude of batch effects per a guided principal component analysis which quantifies the magnitude of batch effects (δ = 0, p&lt;0.001); and 3) CLR and zero imputation improved the removal of batch effects and variance explained by the wanted variable by ZMC. These results call for careful application of BECASs and indicate that ZMC, Ratio-A, ConQuR provide some improvements in remediating batch effects in batch-covariate imbalanced data. Continued development of BECAs is urgently required for successful use for batch corrections in this use case.
DOI: 10.17632/3wyp7msvfd.1
title: Euglycemia is affected by stress defense factor hepatocyte NRF1, but not NRF2

description: Hepatocyte stress signaling has been established to alter glucose metabolism and impair systemic glucose homeostasis. In contrast, the role of stress defenses in the control of glucose homeostasis is less understood. Nuclear factor erythroid 2 related factor-1 (NRF1) and -2 (NRF2) are transcription factors that promote stress defense and can exert hepatocyte stress defense programming via complementary gene regulation. To identify whether there are independent or complementary roles of these factors in hepatocytes on glucose homeostasis, we investigated the effect of adult-onset, hepatocyte-specific deletion of NRF1, NRF2, or both on glycemia in mice fed 1-3 weeks with a mildly stressful diet enriched with fat, fructose, and cholesterol. Compared to respective control, NRF1 deficiency and combined deficiency reduced glycemia, in some cases resulting in hypoglycemia, whereas there was no effect of NRF2 deficiency. However, reduced glycemia in NRF1 deficiency did not occur in the leptin-deficient mouse model of obesity and diabetes, suggesting hepatocyte NRF1 support defenses that counteract hypoglycemia but does not promote hyperglycemia. Consistent with this, NRF1 deficiency was associated with reduced liver glycogen and glycogen synthase expression as well as marked alteration to circulating level of glycemia-influencing hormones, growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF1). Overall, we identify a role for hepatocyte NRF1 in modulating glucose homeostasis, which may be linked to liver glycogen storage and the growth hormone / IGF1 axis.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.t9frv8
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 190882849 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
(Query is too complex. Can be viewed on the landing page)

 The dataset includes 190882849 records from 27480 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0004203-250117142028555/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154550
title: TABLE 1 in A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos

description: TABLE 1. Cheek-tooth dimensions (mm) of Bohra bandharr. *Anterior end missing enamel; length estimated by extrapolating from anterior edge of anterior root and contours of adjacent enamel.
P3M1M2M3M4LAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHAM F14675412.184.786.775.595.77AM F69828-8.267.26--9.827.776.39--AM F6982911.7*5.856.55--8.268.038.28--FMNH PM15867.906.937.08--9.177.957.66--9.818.127.27--10.037.856.594.764.62p3m1m2m3m4LAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHAM F698309.536.92-4.83-
description: Published as part of Prideaux, Gavin J. & Warburton, Natalie M., 2023, A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos, pp. 29 in Zootaxa 5299 (1) on page 29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5299.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/8012666
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154552
title: TABLE 2 in A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos

description: TABLE 2. Cheek-tooth dimensions (mm) of Bohra sp. cf. B. bandharr.
P3M1M2M3M4LAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHAM F595768.987.266.163.684.11AM F64004--5.88--AM F640077.566.766.61--8.336.886.513.503.90AM F640758.356.876.51--8.56-5.74--AM F642459.507.285.943.694.12NMV P382678.126.656.51--NMV P38351-6.47-4.03-NMV P2572748.436.696.37-3.66NMV P257275--6.24--p3m1m2m3m4LAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHNMV P383256.731.932.533.643.50QM F4750--3.41--5.86-4.89--6.995.525.44--7.725.695.72--8.505.665.27--QM F432818.74-6.43--9.156.69-4.51-QM F586659.486.106.06--9.676.055.694.684.79
description: Published as part of Prideaux, Gavin J. & Warburton, Natalie M., 2023, A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos, pp. 29 in Zootaxa 5299 (1) on page 29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5299.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/8012666
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154554
title: TABLE 3 in A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos

description: TABLE 3. Cheek-tooth dimensions (mm) of Bohra wilkinsonorum.
dP2dP3P3M1M2LAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHQM F432777.385.195.30--7.275.936.72--12.285.266.435.996.088.937.888.424.354.7410.208.728.314.565.32NMV P22195012.485.406.737.255.15NMV P2223789.177.857.995.165.14
description: Published as part of Prideaux, Gavin J. & Warburton, Natalie M., 2023, A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos, pp. 36 in Zootaxa 5299 (1) on page 36, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5299.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/8012666
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154556
title: TABLE 4 in A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos

description: TABLE 4. Cheek-tooth dimensions (mm) of Bohra bila. Data for QM F4740 is from Bartholomai (1976a).
M1M2M3M4LAWPWAH PHLAWPW AH PHLAWPWAHPHLAW PWAH PHQM F47408.67.47.3--9.67.77.0--9.77.26.2--QM F432767.36 7.217.30--8.667.517.11 --9.357.96 6.754.674.679.137.33 5.494.07 4.17QM F586678.427.537.17 4.62 4.89dp3p3m1m2m3m4LAW PW AH PHLAWPW AH PH LAWPWAHPH L AW PWAHPHL AW PWAHPHLAW PWAHPHQM F47496.03 3.47 4.09 3.19 3.49-5.02---QM F4328010.61 4.174.56- - 7.43 -5.40-- 8.30 6.01 6.04-- 9.91 7.13 6.91 --10.517.15 6.26--QM F586688.11 5.145.525.27 6.05QM F586699.60 6.72 6.68 6.026.48
description: Published as part of Prideaux, Gavin J. & Warburton, Natalie M., 2023, A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos, pp. 36 in Zootaxa 5299 (1) on page 36, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5299.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/8012666
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154558
title: TABLE 5 in A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos

description: TABLE 5. Cheek-tooth dimensions (mm) of Bohra illuminata.
P3M1M2M3M4LAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHWAM 02.7.169.95-4.963.843.887.466.616.694.064.428.296.856.854.574.70WAM 03.5.109.404.025.245.695.277.176.996.69--8.827.506.934.054.659.417.817.044.404.7410.007.656.494.685.25SAMA P554019.247.535.784.204.41SAMA P55402--6.12-5.05SAMA P554039.577.236.004.044.81SAMA P554069.247.316.704.364.63SAMA P554167.195.936.273.433.89p3m1m2m3m4LAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHWAM 02.7.168.102.483.40--7.594.815.174.975.818.545.635.946.08-WAM 03.5.10-4.615.14--8.345.585.713.674.6110.656.566.815.305.8710.726.616.285.866.59SAMA P554087.724.905.235.396.44SAMA P554098.264.955.464.686.23SAMA P554107.084.435.024.275.24
description: Published as part of Prideaux, Gavin J. & Warburton, Natalie M., 2023, A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos, pp. 43 in Zootaxa 5299 (1) on page 43, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5299.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/8012666
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154560
title: TABLE 6 in A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos

description: TABLE 6. Cheek-tooth dimensions (mm) of Bohra nullarbora.
dP3P3M1M2M3M4LAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHWAM 05.4.708.934.424.144.233.617.396.446.92--8.387.397.07--8.957.946.623.743.688.577.145.673.864.17SAMA P552048.587.537.195.045.04SAMA P552058.687.227.004.094.74SAMA P552068.847.957.704.214.59SAMA P553897.656.126.712.623.01SAMA P553907.485.526.34--SAMA P553917.426.266.40--SAMA P553928.006.246.723.483.74SAMA P553938.346.767.35--SAMA P553947.576.486.94--SAMA P553957.716.696.904.034.10SAMA P553967.906.296.843.404.20SAMA P553977.986.716.933.884.24SAMA P553988.426.906.634.244.82SAMA P5540010.318.017.574.895.01SAMA P554077.396.076.77--SAMA P554136.255.085.473.233.42m1m2m3m4LAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHLAWPWAHPHWAM 05.4.706.944.574.58--7.905.445.47--9.126.036.083.654.328.516.045.473.76-SAMA P554117.655.035.27--SAMA P554128.295.925.715.295.66SAMA P554176.144.334.36--SAMA P55419-5.50---
TABLE 6 (continued).
description: Published as part of Prideaux, Gavin J. & Warburton, Natalie M., 2023, A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos, pp. 50-51 in Zootaxa 5299 (1) on page 50, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5299.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/8012666
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154562
title: TABLE 8 in A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos

description: TABLE 8. Postcranial element dimensions (mm) for representative specimens of species of Bohra and Dendrolagus. Abbreviation: est., estimated.
ElementBohra paulaeBohra illumi- nata WAM 03.5.10Bohra nullar- bora WAM 05.4.70Bohra planei UCMP 70128Bohra wilkin- sonorum QM F675Bohra sp. indet. 1 QM F51762Bohra sp. indet. 2 UCMP 60850aDendrolagus bennettianus QM JM 19863Dendrolagus lumholtzi FUR 403HUMERUSMaximum length (est.)10511092.9101Maximum distal width37.43932.230.0FEMURMaximum length145 (diaphy- sis)150 (diaphy- sis)204136137Proximal maximum width (est.)57.033.4Mid-shaft height (depth) × width17.4 × 18.818.2 x 18.713.5 x 13.4TIBIAAM F62101Diaphysis length260183115125Proximal epiphysis width × depth45.8 x 51.328.9 x 24.827.5 x 25.4Distal epiphysis width × depth42.3 x 35.922.8 x 13.723.4 x 18.319.1 x 10.918.6 x 14.6CALCANEUSAM F62099Maximum length52.636.143.440.952.545.031.931.7Maximum width32.023.727.725.632.928.621.520.3Tuber calcanei posterior width20.825.419.611.611.2Tuber calcanei depth20.313.716.516.720.817.611.812.0Talar articulation width27.219.92219.628.122.017.616.6Cuboid dorsomedial facet width13.510.010.98.410.59.85.67.9Cuboid dorsolateral facet width12.96.26.87.411.16.95.54.6Cuboid ventromedial facet width8.38.28.48.97.06.47.3TALUSAM F62100
description: Published as part of Prideaux, Gavin J. & Warburton, Natalie M., 2023, A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos, pp. 53 in Zootaxa 5299 (1) on page 53, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5299.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/8012666
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154564
title: TABLE 7 in A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos

description: TABLE 7. Cheek-tooth dimensions (mm) of Bohra planei sp. nov.
LAWM1 PWAHPHLAWM2 PWAHPHAM F494687.626.957.03--8.177.437.06--continued.LAWM3 PWAHPHLAWM4 PWAHPHAM F494688.757.806.87--8.767.286.093.583.73
description: Published as part of Prideaux, Gavin J. & Warburton, Natalie M., 2023, A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos, pp. 62 in Zootaxa 5299 (1) on page 62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5299.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/8012666
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154566
title: TABLE 9 in A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos

description: TABLE 9. Calcaneal and femoral dimensions (mm) of adult specimens of modern macropodines of known body mass. CL, calcaneus length; CTD, calcaneus tuber depth; CTW, calcaneus tuber width; FC, femur circumference.
SpeciesRegistration No.SexMass (kg)CLCTDCTWFCDendrolagus dorianusAM M30720male9–––39Dendrolagus dorianusAM M30750female6.5–––38Dendrolagus dorianusAM M30753male8.5–––40Dendrolagus goodfellowiAM M9145female5.629.5512.8412.9443Dendrolagus inustusAM M21840female11–––43Dendrolagus inustusAM M24437female10.632.5113.7614.45–Dendrolagus inustusAM M25390male1738.0316.1416.9949Dendrolagus lumholtziANWC M29301male7.531.4412.7412.9840Dendrolagus lumholtziQM JM10086male4.324.9210.739.8337Dendrolagus mbaisoAM M30749female9–––37Dendrolagus mbaisoAM M30751female8.527.3112.8713.51–Dendrolagus scottaeAM M21867male9.5–––37Dendrolagus scottaeAM M24424male11.531.6914.0015.7041Dendrolagus scottaeAM M25397female9.529.1711.8714.0338Dorcopsis atrataAM M19461male7.527.5111.6210.8339Dorcopsis muelleriAM M32339female5.9–––38Dorcopsis muelleriAM M32341male1336.7812.5313.8846Dorcopsulus vanheurniAM M30727male219.347.256.7423Notamacropus eugeniiANWC M11459female2.1–––32Notamacropus eugeniiANWC M18014male3.5–––32Macropus fuliginosusANWC M01370female24.465.7019.4117.3461Macropus fuliginosusANWC M01375female2761.4419.6317.3567Macropus fuliginosusANWC M01378female24.163.8819.0016.5861Macropus fuliginosusANWC M01379female22.964.8118.7917.5165Macropus fuliginosusANWC M01381female24.562.0119.4617.5466Macropus fuliginosusANWC M01384male55.581.424.8724.1470Macropus fuliginosusANWC M01385male3475.7523.7421.6567Macropus giganteusANWC M01371female21.665.4119.0218.3864Macropus giganteusANWC M01372female23.868.5619.4218.8263Macropus giganteusANWC M01376female21.166.7818.4818.3858Macropus giganteusANWC M01377female25.565.2619.6119.5166Macropus giganteusSAM M22820/011female28–––65Macropus giganteusSAM M22820/013female36–––77Macropus giganteusSAM M22820/015female36–––73Notamacropus parmaANWC M08979female4.5–––34Osphranter rufusSAM M22821/001male55–––78Osphranter rufusSAM M22821/007male57–––84Osphranter rufusSAM M22821/008male64.5–––82Osphranter rufusSAM M22821/010male47–––76Osphranter rufusSAM M22821/011male39.5–––78Osphranter rufusSAM M22821/012male60–––90Osphranter rufusSAM M22822/005female18.5–––67Osphranter rufusSAM M22822/008female35–––73
description: Published as part of Prideaux, Gavin J. & Warburton, Natalie M., 2023, A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos, pp. 70-71 in Zootaxa 5299 (1) on page 70, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5299.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/8012666
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154567
title: TABLE 9 in A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos

description: TABLE 9. Calcaneal and femoral dimensions (mm) of adult specimens of modern macropodines of known body mass. CL, calcaneus length; CTD, calcaneus tuber depth; CTW, calcaneus tuber width; FC, femur circumference.
SpeciesRegistration No.SexMass (kg)CLCTDCTWFCDendrolagus dorianusAM M30720male9–––39Dendrolagus dorianusAM M30750female6.5–––38Dendrolagus dorianusAM M30753male8.5–––40Dendrolagus goodfellowiAM M9145female5.629.5512.8412.9443Dendrolagus inustusAM M21840female11–––43Dendrolagus inustusAM M24437female10.632.5113.7614.45–Dendrolagus inustusAM M25390male1738.0316.1416.9949Dendrolagus lumholtziANWC M29301male7.531.4412.7412.9840Dendrolagus lumholtziQM JM10086male4.324.9210.739.8337Dendrolagus mbaisoAM M30749female9–––37Dendrolagus mbaisoAM M30751female8.527.3112.8713.51–Dendrolagus scottaeAM M21867male9.5–––37Dendrolagus scottaeAM M24424male11.531.6914.0015.7041Dendrolagus scottaeAM M25397female9.529.1711.8714.0338Dorcopsis atrataAM M19461male7.527.5111.6210.8339Dorcopsis muelleriAM M32339female5.9–––38Dorcopsis muelleriAM M32341male1336.7812.5313.8846Dorcopsulus vanheurniAM M30727male219.347.256.7423Notamacropus eugeniiANWC M11459female2.1–––32Notamacropus eugeniiANWC M18014male3.5–––32Macropus fuliginosusANWC M01370female24.465.7019.4117.3461Macropus fuliginosusANWC M01375female2761.4419.6317.3567Macropus fuliginosusANWC M01378female24.163.8819.0016.5861Macropus fuliginosusANWC M01379female22.964.8118.7917.5165Macropus fuliginosusANWC M01381female24.562.0119.4617.5466Macropus fuliginosusANWC M01384male55.581.424.8724.1470Macropus fuliginosusANWC M01385male3475.7523.7421.6567Macropus giganteusANWC M01371female21.665.4119.0218.3864Macropus giganteusANWC M01372female23.868.5619.4218.8263Macropus giganteusANWC M01376female21.166.7818.4818.3858Macropus giganteusANWC M01377female25.565.2619.6119.5166Macropus giganteusSAM M22820/011female28–––65Macropus giganteusSAM M22820/013female36–––77Macropus giganteusSAM M22820/015female36–––73Notamacropus parmaANWC M08979female4.5–––34Osphranter rufusSAM M22821/001male55–––78Osphranter rufusSAM M22821/007male57–––84Osphranter rufusSAM M22821/008male64.5–––82Osphranter rufusSAM M22821/010male47–––76Osphranter rufusSAM M22821/011male39.5–––78Osphranter rufusSAM M22821/012male60–––90Osphranter rufusSAM M22822/005female18.5–––67Osphranter rufusSAM M22822/008female35–––73
description: Published as part of Prideaux, Gavin J. & Warburton, Natalie M., 2023, A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos, pp. 70-71 in Zootaxa 5299 (1) on page 70, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5299.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/8012666
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15154568
title: TABLE 10 in A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos

description: TABLE 10. Regression equation (log 10) and p values for hindlimb dimensions, along with the corresponding ratio (smearing) estimator used to correct for biasing effects of logarithmic transformation.
Dimensionr2p valuey-interceptRegression coefficientRatio estimator valueDendrolagina (n = 14)FC CL CTW0.31 0.72 0.900.06 <0.05 <0.052.40947 2.91436 2.52102–2.92850 –3.38573 –1.927411.03862 1.01910 1.01280CTD CL × CTW CL × CTD0.75 0.88 0.77<0.05 <0.05 <0.053.11435 1.45312 1.56459–2.53849 –2.86921 –3.129611.01676 1.01064 1.01502CL × CTW × CTD0.86<0.051.56459–2.858811.01050Macropodinae (n = 63)FC0.91<0.05–3.55572.75371.2283CL CTW CTD0.86 0.70 0.95<0.05 <0.05 <0.05–2.0146 –0.1431 –1.79441.8965 0.9890 2.47141.4487 0.9649 0.9777CL × CTW CL × CTD0.95 0.93<0.05 <0.05–2.1583 –2.01711.1635 1.10891.1546 1.2347CL × CTD × CTW0.96<0.05–2.07040.79851.0974
description: Published as part of Prideaux, Gavin J. & Warburton, Natalie M., 2023, A review of the late Cenozoic genus Bohra (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) and the evolution of tree-kangaroos, pp. 72 in Zootaxa 5299 (1) on page 72, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5299.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/8012666