cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.3886/e27534v1
title: Southern Education and Racial Discrimination, 1880-1910

description: This data collection makes machine readable extensive data from the reports of southern state superintendents of education, generally for years divisible by 5, from 1880 to 1910, and merges it with political data. Similar reports of state comptrollers were also sources. Everything is on the county level. The data are from eight ex-Confederate states, namely Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Virginia.
<br>
<br>The purpose of the collection was to assess the changes in the distribution of educational goals by race and class. For example, what effects did the disfranchisement of blacks and poor whites have on the pattern of educational expenditures?
<br>
<br>Files in this collection are organized by state and within each state by files with extensions indicated respectively by COD, DOC and DAT. Files with the .COD extension list the counties and the county code abbreviations used in the corresponding data files. Files with the .DOC extension describe the wealth and educational data given in the corresponding DATA files. The .DOC files are organized in groups of 6 to correspond with the structure of the .DAT files. Files with the .DAT extension list the numeric educational and wealth data values corresponding to the description given in the .DOC files. Files with the .BAK extension appear to be backups of .DAT files, although some .BAK files may differ slightly from the corresponding original .DAT files. 
<br>
<br>The primary publication resulting from this data collection:
<br>Kousser, J. M. (1980). Progressivism - For Middle-Class Whites Only: North Carolina Education, 1880-1910. The Journal of Southern History, 46(2), 169-194.
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e27580v1
title: Southern Education and Racial Discrimination, 1880-1910

description: This data collection makes machine readable extensive data from the reports of southern state superintendents of education, generally for years divisible by 5, from 1880 to 1910, and merges it with political data. Similar reports of state comptrollers were also sources. Everything is on the county level. The data are from eight ex-Confederate states, namely Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Virginia.
<br>
<br>The purpose of the collection was to assess the changes in the distribution of educational goals by race and class. For example, what effects did the disfranchisement of blacks and poor whites have on the pattern of educational expenditures?
<br>
<br>Files in this collection are organized by state and within each state by files with extensions indicated respectively by COD, DOC and DAT. Files with the .COD extension list the counties and the county code abbreviations used in the corresponding data files. Files with the .DOC extension describe the wealth and educational data given in the corresponding DATA files. The .DOC files are organized in groups of 6 to correspond with the structure of the .DAT files. Files with the .DAT extension list the numeric educational and wealth data values corresponding to the description given in the .DOC files. Files with the .BAK extension appear to be backups of .DAT files, although some .BAK files may differ slightly from the corresponding original .DAT files. 
<br>
<br>The primary publication resulting from this data collection:
<br>Kousser, J. M. (1980). Progressivism - For Middle-Class Whites Only: North Carolina Education, 1880-1910. The Journal of Southern History, 46(2), 169-194.
<br>
DOI: 10.6073/pasta/79c2c8f8b56d45943b0d02badd4c1a8f
title: Sawgrass above ground biomass from the Shark River Slough, Everglades National Park (FCE), South Florida from November 2000 to Present
DOI: 10.3886/e27598v1
title: Southern Education and Racial Discrimination, 1880-1910

description: This data collection makes machine readable extensive data from the reports of southern state superintendents of education, generally for years divisible by 5, from 1880 to 1910, and merges it with political data. Similar reports of state comptrollers were also sources. Everything is on the county level. The data are from eight ex-Confederate states, namely Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Virginia.
<br>
<br>The purpose of the collection was to assess the changes in the distribution of educational goals by race and class. For example, what effects did the disfranchisement of blacks and poor whites have on the pattern of educational expenditures?
<br>
<br>Files in this collection are organized by state and within each state by files with extensions indicated respectively by COD, DOC and DAT. Files with the .COD extension list the counties and the county code abbreviations used in the corresponding data files. Files with the .DOC extension describe the wealth and educational data given in the corresponding DATA files. The .DOC files are organized in groups of 6 to correspond with the structure of the .DAT files. Files with the .DAT extension list the numeric educational and wealth data values corresponding to the description given in the .DOC files. Files with the .BAK extension appear to be backups of .DAT files, although some .BAK files may differ slightly from the corresponding original .DAT files. 
<br>
<br>The primary publication resulting from this data collection:
<br>Kousser, J. M. (1980). Progressivism - For Middle-Class Whites Only: North Carolina Education, 1880-1910. The Journal of Southern History, 46(2), 169-194.
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e27653v1
title: Southern Education and Racial Discrimination, 1880-1910

description: This data collection makes machine readable extensive data from the reports of southern state superintendents of education, generally for years divisible by 5, from 1880 to 1910, and merges it with political data. Similar reports of state comptrollers were also sources. Everything is on the county level. The data are from eight ex-Confederate states, namely Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Virginia.
<br>
<br>The purpose of the collection was to assess the changes in the distribution of educational goals by race and class. For example, what effects did the disfranchisement of blacks and poor whites have on the pattern of educational expenditures?
<br>
<br>Files in this collection are organized by state and within each state by files with extensions indicated respectively by COD, DOC and DAT. Files with the .COD extension list the counties and the county code abbreviations used in the corresponding data files. Files with the .DOC extension describe the wealth and educational data given in the corresponding DATA files. The .DOC files are organized in groups of 6 to correspond with the structure of the .DAT files. Files with the .DAT extension list the numeric educational and wealth data values corresponding to the description given in the .DOC files. Files with the .BAK extension appear to be backups of .DAT files, although some .BAK files may differ slightly from the corresponding original .DAT files. 
<br>
<br>The primary publication resulting from this data collection:
<br>Kousser, J. M. (1980). Progressivism - For Middle-Class Whites Only: North Carolina Education, 1880-1910. The Journal of Southern History, 46(2), 169-194.
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e27761v1
title: Southern Education and Racial Discrimination, 1880-1910

description: This data collection makes machine readable extensive data from the reports of southern state superintendents of education, generally for years divisible by 5, from 1880 to 1910, and merges it with political data. Similar reports of state comptrollers were also sources. Everything is on the county level. The data are from eight ex-Confederate states, namely Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Virginia.
<br>
<br>The purpose of the collection was to assess the changes in the distribution of educational goals by race and class. For example, what effects did the disfranchisement of blacks and poor whites have on the pattern of educational expenditures?
<br>
<br>Files in this collection are organized by state and within each state by files with extensions indicated respectively by COD, DOC and DAT. Files with the .COD extension list the counties and the county code abbreviations used in the corresponding data files. Files with the .DOC extension describe the wealth and educational data given in the corresponding DATA files. The .DOC files are organized in groups of 6 to correspond with the structure of the .DAT files. Files with the .DAT extension list the numeric educational and wealth data values corresponding to the description given in the .DOC files. Files with the .BAK extension appear to be backups of .DAT files, although some .BAK files may differ slightly from the corresponding original .DAT files. 
<br>
<br>The primary publication resulting from this data collection:
<br>Kousser, J. M. (1980). Progressivism - For Middle-Class Whites Only: North Carolina Education, 1880-1910. The Journal of Southern History, 46(2), 169-194.
<br>
DOI: 10.4231/d3639k624
title: NCBF1: UW Non-Seismic Conetrically Braced Frame (NCBF) with Welded Continuous Shear Tab and Non-Ductile HSS Brace

description: This specimen consisted of a single-bay one-story concentrically braced frame with single-diagonal bracing. The frame was intended to be representative of existing non-seismic concentrically braced frames (NCBFs) with continuous welded shear tab connections at brace-beam-column intersections. The braces and connections were deficient with respect to the 2010 AISC Seismic Provisions. The HSS brace did not meet the compactness limit for highly ductile members required for SCBFs (b/t = 27.0 &gt; 13.8). Connection deficiencies included gusset plate yielding of the Whitmore section, gusset plate shear yielding, gusset plate-to-beam and gusset plate-to-shear tab weld fracture, brace net section rupture, brace block shear rupture, and gusset plate block shear rupture. AWS E70T-7 weld metal, which does not meet minimum toughness requirements for demand critical welds, was used except on the gusset plate-to-beam and shear tab-to-column welds, where notch-tough weld metal was used. The specimen was loaded quasistatically through a load beam bolted to the north beam using a reversed cyclic increasing amplitude loading protocol. Traditional physical sensors and optical sensors were installed on the specimen.
DOI: 10.4231/d3xk84r3c
title: NCBF1-R4: UW Non-Seismic Concentrically Braced Frame (NCBF) with Welded Continuous Shear Tab and Rectangular HSS Brace In-Plane Buckling Retrofit

description: This specimen consisted of a single-bay one-story concentrically braced frame with single-diagonal bracing. The frame was intended to be representative of a rehabilitated non-seismic concentrically braced frame (NCBF) with continuous welded shear tab connections at brace-beam-column intersections. The connection used in NCBF1 was rehabilitated for in-plane buckling by welding a knife plate to the existing gusset plate. This rehabilitation was slightly different than that used in NCBF1-R4 in that the knife plate did not extend as far back into the connection. This was intended to eliminate deformation demands on the gusset plate welds associated with out-of-plane plate bending. Also, a highly ductile rectangular HSS was used to ensure in-plane buckling about the brace’s weak axis. Since the existing gusset plates and shear tabs were used, some deficiencies with respect to the 2010 AISC Seismic Provisions remained. Connection deficiencies included knife plate yielding, gusset plate yielding of the Whitmore section, gusset plate shear yielding, gusset plate-to-beam and -shear tab weld fracture, brace net section rupture, gusset plate block shear rupture, and gusset plate buckling. The specimen was loaded quasistatically through a load beam bolted to the north beam using a reversed cyclic increasing amplitude loading protocol. Traditional physical sensors and optical sensors were installed on the specimen. Portions of the specimen were whitewashed to detect yielding.
DOI: 10.6073/pasta/ef0840c7a5bc11db740f4f14358e42fe
title: SBC LTER: Reef: Long-term experiment: Algal Biomass
DOI: 10.6073/pasta/f45a1c11f23cfcea59429e78aaa7c92c
title: Soil Characteristics in the Clearcut Site at Harvard Forest 2012
DOI: 10.14455/tsme.res.2014.216
title: A Study on Passenger Bus Superstructure Strength for Rollover Test
DOI: 10.3886/e27634v1
title: Southern Education and Racial Discrimination, 1880-1910

description: This data collection makes machine readable extensive data from the reports of southern state superintendents of education, generally for years divisible by 5, from 1880 to 1910, and merges it with political data. Similar reports of state comptrollers were also sources. Everything is on the county level. The data are from eight ex-Confederate states, namely Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Virginia.
<br>
<br>The purpose of the collection was to assess the changes in the distribution of educational goals by race and class. For example, what effects did the disfranchisement of blacks and poor whites have on the pattern of educational expenditures?
<br>
<br>Files in this collection are organized by state and within each state by files with extensions indicated respectively by COD, DOC and DAT. Files with the .COD extension list the counties and the county code abbreviations used in the corresponding data files. Files with the .DOC extension describe the wealth and educational data given in the corresponding DATA files. The .DOC files are organized in groups of 6 to correspond with the structure of the .DAT files. Files with the .DAT extension list the numeric educational and wealth data values corresponding to the description given in the .DOC files. Files with the .BAK extension appear to be backups of .DAT files, although some .BAK files may differ slightly from the corresponding original .DAT files. 
<br>
<br>The primary publication resulting from this data collection:
<br>Kousser, J. M. (1980). Progressivism - For Middle-Class Whites Only: North Carolina Education, 1880-1910. The Journal of Southern History, 46(2), 169-194.
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e27698v1
title: Southern Education and Racial Discrimination, 1880-1910

description: This data collection makes machine readable extensive data from the reports of southern state superintendents of education, generally for years divisible by 5, from 1880 to 1910, and merges it with political data. Similar reports of state comptrollers were also sources. Everything is on the county level. The data are from eight ex-Confederate states, namely Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Virginia.
<br>
<br>The purpose of the collection was to assess the changes in the distribution of educational goals by race and class. For example, what effects did the disfranchisement of blacks and poor whites have on the pattern of educational expenditures?
<br>
<br>Files in this collection are organized by state and within each state by files with extensions indicated respectively by COD, DOC and DAT. Files with the .COD extension list the counties and the county code abbreviations used in the corresponding data files. Files with the .DOC extension describe the wealth and educational data given in the corresponding DATA files. The .DOC files are organized in groups of 6 to correspond with the structure of the .DAT files. Files with the .DAT extension list the numeric educational and wealth data values corresponding to the description given in the .DOC files. Files with the .BAK extension appear to be backups of .DAT files, although some .BAK files may differ slightly from the corresponding original .DAT files. 
<br>
<br>The primary publication resulting from this data collection:
<br>Kousser, J. M. (1980). Progressivism - For Middle-Class Whites Only: North Carolina Education, 1880-1910. The Journal of Southern History, 46(2), 169-194.
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e27798v1
title: Southern Education and Racial Discrimination, 1880-1910

description: This data collection makes machine readable extensive data from the reports of southern state superintendents of education, generally for years divisible by 5, from 1880 to 1910, and merges it with political data. Similar reports of state comptrollers were also sources. Everything is on the county level. The data are from eight ex-Confederate states, namely Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Virginia.
<br>
<br>The purpose of the collection was to assess the changes in the distribution of educational goals by race and class. For example, what effects did the disfranchisement of blacks and poor whites have on the pattern of educational expenditures?
<br>
<br>Files in this collection are organized by state and within each state by files with extensions indicated respectively by COD, DOC and DAT. Files with the .COD extension list the counties and the county code abbreviations used in the corresponding data files. Files with the .DOC extension describe the wealth and educational data given in the corresponding DATA files. The .DOC files are organized in groups of 6 to correspond with the structure of the .DAT files. Files with the .DAT extension list the numeric educational and wealth data values corresponding to the description given in the .DOC files. Files with the .BAK extension appear to be backups of .DAT files, although some .BAK files may differ slightly from the corresponding original .DAT files. 
<br>
<br>The primary publication resulting from this data collection:
<br>Kousser, J. M. (1980). Progressivism - For Middle-Class Whites Only: North Carolina Education, 1880-1910. The Journal of Southern History, 46(2), 169-194.
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e27825v1
title: Southern Education and Racial Discrimination, 1880-1910

description: This data collection makes machine readable extensive data from the reports of southern state superintendents of education, generally for years divisible by 5, from 1880 to 1910, and merges it with political data. Similar reports of state comptrollers were also sources. Everything is on the county level. The data are from eight ex-Confederate states, namely Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Virginia.
<br>
<br>The purpose of the collection was to assess the changes in the distribution of educational goals by race and class. For example, what effects did the disfranchisement of blacks and poor whites have on the pattern of educational expenditures?
<br>
<br>Files in this collection are organized by state and within each state by files with extensions indicated respectively by COD, DOC and DAT. Files with the .COD extension list the counties and the county code abbreviations used in the corresponding data files. Files with the .DOC extension describe the wealth and educational data given in the corresponding DATA files. The .DOC files are organized in groups of 6 to correspond with the structure of the .DAT files. Files with the .DAT extension list the numeric educational and wealth data values corresponding to the description given in the .DOC files. Files with the .BAK extension appear to be backups of .DAT files, although some .BAK files may differ slightly from the corresponding original .DAT files. 
<br>
<br>The primary publication resulting from this data collection:
<br>Kousser, J. M. (1980). Progressivism - For Middle-Class Whites Only: North Carolina Education, 1880-1910. The Journal of Southern History, 46(2), 169-194.
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e27843v1
title: Southern Education and Racial Discrimination, 1880-1910

description: This data collection makes machine readable extensive data from the reports of southern state superintendents of education, generally for years divisible by 5, from 1880 to 1910, and merges it with political data. Similar reports of state comptrollers were also sources. Everything is on the county level. The data are from eight ex-Confederate states, namely Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Virginia.
<br>
<br>The purpose of the collection was to assess the changes in the distribution of educational goals by race and class. For example, what effects did the disfranchisement of blacks and poor whites have on the pattern of educational expenditures?
<br>
<br>Files in this collection are organized by state and within each state by files with extensions indicated respectively by COD, DOC and DAT. Files with the .COD extension list the counties and the county code abbreviations used in the corresponding data files. Files with the .DOC extension describe the wealth and educational data given in the corresponding DATA files. The .DOC files are organized in groups of 6 to correspond with the structure of the .DAT files. Files with the .DAT extension list the numeric educational and wealth data values corresponding to the description given in the .DOC files. Files with the .BAK extension appear to be backups of .DAT files, although some .BAK files may differ slightly from the corresponding original .DAT files. 
<br>
<br>The primary publication resulting from this data collection:
<br>Kousser, J. M. (1980). Progressivism - For Middle-Class Whites Only: North Carolina Education, 1880-1910. The Journal of Southern History, 46(2), 169-194.
<br>
DOI: 10.6073/pasta/6f25b2edfd4858627a1d462dc591ac82
title: North Temperate Lakes LTER: Zooplankton - Madison Lakes Area 1997 - current
DOI: 10.6073/pasta/81e0fc75f420c948340b17715a4d78a5
title: Soil Physical Data from the Taylor Slough, just outside Everglades National Park (FCE), from October 1998 to October 2006
DOI: 10.6073/pasta/874b6dc73f00cffb68e552dd6fa89c0d
title: Intensive Stream Survey Geomorphology Data from 2010 to 2011 at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, Otto, NC
DOI: 10.6073/pasta/8aa05fcb442cb8c8d1f2bae438cbfdd1
title: Nonstructural Carbohydrates in Red Maple at Harvard Forest and Bartlett Forest 2011-2012
DOI: 10.6073/pasta/a990cfb0143fa664ac47f9aaae0bcf03
title: Water Levels from the Shark River Slough, Everglades National Park (FCE), South Florida from October 2000 to Present
DOI: 10.14455/tsme.res.2014.226
title: Model Reference Input Shaping Using Quantitative Feedback Control
DOI: 10.3886/e27405v1
title: Southern Education and Racial Discrimination, 1880-1910

description: This data collection makes machine readable extensive data from the reports of southern state superintendents of education, generally for years divisible by 5, from 1880 to 1910, and merges it with political data. Similar reports of state comptrollers were also sources. Everything is on the county level. The data are from eight ex-Confederate states, namely Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Virginia.
<br>
<br>The purpose of the collection was to assess the changes in the distribution of educational goals by race and class. For example, what effects did the disfranchisement of blacks and poor whites have on the pattern of educational expenditures?
<br>
<br>Files in this collection are organized by state and within each state by files with extensions indicated respectively by COD, DOC and DAT. Files with the .COD extension list the counties and the county code abbreviations used in the corresponding data files. Files with the .DOC extension describe the wealth and educational data given in the corresponding DATA files. The .DOC files are organized in groups of 6 to correspond with the structure of the .DAT files. Files with the .DAT extension list the numeric educational and wealth data values corresponding to the description given in the .DOC files. Files with the .BAK extension appear to be backups of .DAT files, although some .BAK files may differ slightly from the corresponding original .DAT files. 
<br>
<br>The primary publication resulting from this data collection:
<br>Kousser, J. M. (1980). Progressivism - For Middle-Class Whites Only: North Carolina Education, 1880-1910. The Journal of Southern History, 46(2), 169-194.
<br>