cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.48529/9wrr-x383
title: Enterprise Survey 2005
title: RUS_2005_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/9s0c-q012
title: Management, Organization and Innovation Survey 2009
title: RUS_2009_MOI_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/nwnc-q970
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: PRY_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/bh9v-p454
title: Enterprise Survey 2009
title: RUS_2009_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/g5v6-2c71
title: Management, Organization and Innovation Survey 2009
title: SRB_2009_MOI_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/kybw-5e58
title: Enterprise Survey 2009
title: SLE_2009_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/hft1-3f63
title: Enterprise Survey 2009
title: SRB_2009_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/y40k-4q70
title: Enterprise Survey 2005
title: SVK_2005_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/t15x-g480
title: Enterprise Survey 2009
title: SVK_2009_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/ffzr-w254
title: Enterprise Survey 2005
title: SVN_2005_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/rzam-g395
title: Enterprise Survey 2009
title: SVN_2009_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/9k88-r910
title: Enterprise Survey 2009
title: SYR_2009_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/t5rq-qk28
title: Enterprise Survey 2009
title: TGO_2009_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/nq6e-x223
title: Enterprise Survey 2005
title: TJK_2005_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/fty3-yt30
title: Enterprise Survey 2008
title: TJK_2008_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/0cvn-ky98
title: Enterprise Survey 2009
title: TON_2009_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/81fj-5064
title: Enterprise Survey 2008
title: TUR_2008_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/1d0r-hn10
title: Enterprise Survey 2005
title: TUR_2005_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/r1ts-7398
title: Financial Crisis Survey 2009, First Round
title: TUR_2009_FCSr1_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/a3pz-m461
title: Financial Crisis Survey 2010, Second Round
title: TUR_2010_FCSr2_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/6htb-y741
title: Enterprise Survey 2005
title: UKR_2005_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/r41x-cf52
title: Financial Crisis Survey 2010, Third Round
title: TUR_2010_FCSr3_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/25g3-vb04
title: Management, Organization and Innovation Survey 2009
title: UKR_2009_MOI_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/vkc2-fq91
title: Enterprise Survey 2008
title: UKR_2008_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/tghd-9p79
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: URY_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/5th3-5h46
title: Enterprise Survey 2008
title: UZB_2008_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/g9gr-fr55
title: Enterprise Survey 2005
title: UZB_2005_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/f0nb-j625
title: Management, Organization and Innovation Survey 2009
title: UZB_2009_MOI_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/bajy-7h29
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: VEN_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/9gsm-jn63
title: Enterprise Survey 2009
title: VNM_2009_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/y8v3-3333
title: Enterprise Survey 2009
title: WSM_2009_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/w0jf-jz91
title: Enterprise Survey 2009
title: VUT_2009_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/c8s7-mh17
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: YEM_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/7km5-9562
title: Enterprise Survey 2005
title: ROU_2005_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/te7y-wt29
title: Enterprise Survey 2009
title: ROU_2009_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/qfmb-5g94
title: Financial Crisis Survey 2009, First Round
title: ROU_2009_FCSr1_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/7r04-5132
title: Financial Crisis Survey 2010, Second Round
title: ROU_2010_FCSr2_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/7z5q-j994
title: Financial Crisis Survey 2010, Third Round
title: ROU_2010_FCSr3_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/5y02-2h88
title: Management, Organization and Innovation Survey 2009
title: ROU_2009_MOI_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/qgas-1k68
title: Enterprise Survey 2005
title: SCG_2005_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/06tz-1447
title: Enterprise Survey 2009
title: TLS_2009_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/5zed-mb50
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: ALB_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/yjmy-t274
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: UZB_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/jvec-2k29
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: ARM_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/6ryt-r626
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: AZE_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/zndr-j230
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: BGR_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/3c6t-7e51
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: TUR_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/3p7r-hj53
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: UKR_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/bjpc-a161
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: SVN_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/eg9k-jq64
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: TJK_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/3jwr-8j86
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: BLR_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/7bq3-et52
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: BIH_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.6073/pasta/4f23d0d998bc19db6ee68b767c8772bf
title: Species interactions during succession in the western Cascade Range of Oregon, 1990 to present

description: The factors that contribute to plant species establishment and decline following disturbance determine the rates and patterns of successional change of a system. In this long-term field experiment, we test the commonly held assumption that competition for space or resources by dominant species determines the outcome of succession. Specifically, we examine the population- and community-level consequences of removing one or more potentially dominant species from the post-disturbance community after clearcut logging and burning of a mature/old-growth Douglas-fir forest. Experimental treatments include: (1) removal of early-seral annual, Senecio sylvaticus, or perennial, Epilobium angustifolium—or both—to test the influences of these early-seral dominants on subsequent community development; (2) removal of all species except Senecio or Epilobium, to test whether the decline of these early-seral dominants is driven by competitive displacement; or (3) removal of shade-tolerant forest species that dominate subsequent stages of succession—Rubus ursinus or Berberis nervosa plus Gaultheria shallon—to test the influences of these long-lived perennials on understory development. The experiment is a randomized block design comprising eight removal treatments plus a control replicated in each of 25 blocks. Removal (reduction in competition) is achieved by removing seedlings or vegetative stems annually from a treatment area of 2.5 x 2.5 m. Sample plots (1 x 1 m) centered within these are used to estimate cover of all vascular plant species and, for the first 8 yr of the experiment, stem density and height, facilitating estimates of above-ground biomass. Pre-harvest data were collected in 1990, logging/burning occurred in 1991, and removal treatments and post-treatment sampling were initiated in 1992. Six of the nine experimental treatments were terminated between 1996 and 1998, with loss of early-seral Senecio and Epilobium from the system. The remaining three treatments (removal of Rubus, removal of Berberis plus Gaultheria, and the control) have been sampled annually since 1992. All regeneration of trees within the experimental area has occurred naturally. In September 2018, the study site partially burned during the larger Terwilliger Fire on the Willamette National Forest. In 2019, plots were assessed for burn severity. Species' removals were terminated, but cover measurements continue in the plots.
DOI: 10.48529/436t-ba41
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: EST_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/z4ze-1n41
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: CZE_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/e9cf-re63
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: SVK_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/m2xm-fm15
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: GEO_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/hz4x-c507
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: HRV_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/8bmf-m170
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: SCG_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/y8ce-7p07
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: RUS_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/452c-2v57
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: HUN_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/b6km-sx11
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: KAZ_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/8sj3-6m31
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: ROU_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/69wt-1e44
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: KGZ_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/6n4s-ab70
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: POL_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/5a5r-bb91
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: LTU_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.6073/pasta/065e8bdaf36478d8e85ab0837d76bbe5
title: Post-logging community structure and biomass accumulation in Watershed 10, Andrews Experimental Forest , 1974 to present

description: Old-growth and mature Douglas-fir forest were clearcut logged in 1975. Large slash was removed from the site rather than burned. Douglas-fir seedlings were planted in 1976 and 1977, but due to poor survival 4.9 ha were replanted in 1978. Despite planting, most tree stems originated naturally, either as sprouts from cut stumps (hardwoods) or as natural regeneration (conifers and hardwoods). Study plots were established and sampled for cover and frequency of understory vegetation and counts of seedlings and saplings prior to harvest (1973) and resampled annually for cover and biomass of understory vegetation and tree growth from 1976-1981, then in 1983, 1985, and then in 4-6 year intervals. WS10 was intensively studied in the 1970’s and 80’s. The entire watershed was surveyed into a 25 x 25-m grid and then 36 15 by 10 meter plots were established for long-term sampling.
DOI: 10.48529/kb1m-h919
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: MKD_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/qbnn-7d66
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: MDA_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/72yr-j764
title: Informal Survey 2010
title: PER_2010_InS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/vhra-k328
title: Informal Survey 2010
title: ARG_2010_InS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/7dd0-dr64
title: Enterprise Survey 2002
title: LVA_2002_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/jnhx-pv63
title: Informal Survey 2010
title: MLI_2010_InS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/tj9j-wy57
title: Informal Survey 2010
title: COD_2010_InS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/q7r2-sx50
title: Informal Survey 2010
title: BWA_2010_InS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/0tw0-w588
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: MLI_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/gkdj-yq24
title: Informal Survey 2010
title: AGO_2010_InS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/s725-6m45
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: BWA_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/1rdn-xs30
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: GMB_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/rpy8-wy11
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: COD_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.6073/pasta/bb99f03241d24a68821426ad4ab0be05
title: Plant succession and biomass dynamics following logging and burning in Watersheds 1 and 3, Andrews Experimental Forest, 1962 to Present

description: Watersheds 1 and 3 in the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest have a long history of hydrologic, geomorphic, and ecological study. Long-term successional studies in the two watersheds are unprecedented in their scope and duration (1962 to present), spanning more than 50 years of post-logging measurements. To date, studies have focused on understory responses to logging and burning, early stand developmental processes (tree growth and mortality), and understory responses to canopy closure. Understory sampling was initiated in 1962, prior to harvest, and includes approximately 190, 2 x 2 m permanent understory plots. Measurements include estimates of ground-surface conditions and abundance (cover and biomass) of herbaceous, shrub, and tree species. Plots were sampled annually through 1972/1973, but less frequently thereafter (every 2-6 years). Studies of early stand development were initiated in 1979/1980 in conjunction with the understory plots. In each of approximately 190, 250 m2 tree plots all conifer and hardwood stems greater or equal to 1.4 m tall are tagged, measured for diameter, and assessed for status (live or dead, including the cause of mortality). Both watersheds have experienced recent snow-related windthrow (2019, 2020) and parts of WS1 have burned in a low-severity wildfire (2020) adding complexity to early successional outcomes.
DOI: 10.48529/5y59-aj05
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: AGO_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/98yt-dg97
title: Micro-Enterprise Survey 2006
title: GMB_2006_MS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/18d3-fq25
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: TZA_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/4sv7-nj60
title: Micro-Enterprise Survey 2006
title: TZA_2006_MS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/h7n8-dq50
title: Micro-Enterprise Survey 2006
title: RWA_2006_MS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/g4q5-s967
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: SWZ_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/1x11-x279
title: Micro-Enterprise Survey 2006
title: SWZ_2006_MS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/gbkx-r422
title: Micro-Enterprise Survey 2006
title: NAM_2006_MS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/zxvm-7g73
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: RWA_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/d0be-7449
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: MRT_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/x423-6w35
title: Micro-Enterprise Survey 2006
title: MRT_2006_MS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/3cev-5r95
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: NAM_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/vpgn-ah98
title: Micro-Enterprise Survey 2006
title: GNB_2006_MS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/w0e4-m588
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: GNB_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/tc6t-kp80
title: Micro-Enterprise Survey 2006
title: COD_2006_MS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/yvje-a640
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: COD_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/mfp8-eb15
title: Micro-Enterprise Survey 2006
title: BWA_2006_MS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/xv8q-zj58
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: BWA_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/grmf-ke38
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: BDI_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/mspw-e314
title: Employee Survey 2009
title: BTN_2009_Emp_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/39wa-hn91
title: Micro-Enterprise Survey 2006
title: BDI_2006_MS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/nxrz-0d11
title: Micro-Enterprise Survey 2006
title: AGO_2006_MS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/09qf-e217
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: ETH_2006_ES_v01_M
DOI: 10.48529/fex4-6c48
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: CPV_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/hfx1-tm39
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: AGO_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/e9zs-3q03
title: Informal Survey 2006
title: CPV_2006_InS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/5t6j-c669
title: Enterprise Survey 2005
title: MWI_2005_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/nd0k-m715
title: Enterprise Survey 2005
title: NER_2005_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/cw9x-y528
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: CMR_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/8sey-5b26
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: BFA_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/srtj-6k96
title: Informal Survey 2006
title: CMR_2006_InS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/0bx5-vz08
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: GIN_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/e5ar-hr84
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: WBG_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/vjhg-cn54
title: Micro-Enterprise Survey 2006
title: GIN_2006_MS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/58s8-7v61
title: Micro-Enterprise Survey 2006
title: UGA_2006_MS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/tf3c-h256
title: Investment Climate Survey 2003
title: SLV_2003_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/e47p-sd14
title: Investment Climate Survey 2003
title: GTM_2003_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/tpa6-z039
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: UGA_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/h9n7-s451
title: Investment Climate Survey 2003
title: CHN_2003_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/xdt1-dn66
title: Investment Climate Survey 2003
title: ECU_2003_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/fre1-ex83
title: Investment Climate Survey 2005
title: CHN_2005_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/rxjc-hy33
title: Investment Climate Survey 2003
title: BRA_2003_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/rsvk-h420
title: Investment Climate Survey 2005
title: DOM_2005_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/6zbw-8k47
title: Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey 2003
title: KGZ_2003_BEEPS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/sbkb-6y83
title: Investment Climate Survey 2004
title: CHL_2004_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/ttvq-cj95
title: Investment Climate Survey 2004
title: BGR_2004_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/vk2z-cw73
title: Investment Climate Survey 2003
title: HND_2003_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/chcq-rb75
title: Investment Climate Survey 2004
title: EGY_2004_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/s2s7-qe21
title: Investment Climate Survey 2004
title: GUY_2004_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/qezs-4522
title: Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey 2003
title: TJK_2003_BEEPS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/7f8q-5v89
title: Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey 2003
title: UZB_2003_BEEPS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/fcz8-jv93
title: Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey 2005
title: VNM_2005_BEEPS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/t8be-2w03
title: Investment Climate Survey 2003
title: MNE_2003_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/c9k3-6457
title: Investment Climate Survey 2002
title: PER_2002_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/m0ms-0p92
title: Investment Climate Survey 2003
title: SRB_2003_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/w9az-vk54
title: Investment Climate Survey 2004
title: ZAF_2004_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/y4r8-vq67
title: Investment Climate Survey 2003
title: UGA_2003_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/yxhk-b905
title: Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey 2003
title: MDA_2003_BEEPS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/tejn-re76
title: Investment Climate Survey 2003
title: SEN_2003_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/k11c-s075
title: Investment Climate Survey 2003
title: NIC_2003_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/zraq-7a38
title: Investment Climate Survey 2003
title: PHL_2003_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/xp2t-zk14
title: Investment Climate Survey 2003
title: KEN_2003_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/0jpv-cj38
title: Investment Climate Survey 2003
title: LSO_2003_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/z6hs-ft85
title: Investment Climate Survey 2003
title: IDN_2003_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/tf7x-6s57
title: Enterprise Survey 2007
title: SEN_2007_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/pgfq-dp77
title: Enterprise Survey 2007
title: ZAF_2007_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/b226-3140
title: Enterprise Survey 2007
title: MOZ_2007_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/98sk-4x40
title: Enterprise Survey 2007
title: NGA_2007_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/wa55-c431
title: Enterprise Survey 2007
title: MLI_2007_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/e27j-yv79
title: Enterprise Survey 2007
title: MAR_2007_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/27fy-d215
title: Enterprise Survey 2007
title: KHM_2007_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/raav-sh82
title: Enterprise Survey 2007
title: GHA_2007_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/rmay-g040
title: Enterprise Survey 2007
title: KEN_2007_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/v5xy-a475
title: Enterprise Survey 2007
title: EGY_2007_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/pgq4-rx85
title: Micro-Enterprise Survey 2009
title: TGO_2009_MS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/7pep-8g97
title: Micro-Enterprise Survey 2009
title: MUS_2009_MS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/kmvf-ms86
title: Micro-Enterprise Survey 2009
title: MDG_2009_MS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/g63s-8f41
title: Enterprise Survey 2009
title: LSO_2009_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/tad5-3p97
title: Enterprise Survey 2009
title: LBR_2009_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/qhh6-gv05
title: Productivity of the Investment Climate Private Enterprise Survey 2009
title: LBN_2009_PICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/t2cv-h874
title: Productivity of the Investment Climate Private Enterprise Survey 2006
title: LBN_2006_PICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/z1m8-p072
title: Enterprise Survey 2006
title: JOR_2006_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/mp16-6947
title: Investment Climate Survey 2006
title: LAO_2006_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/3173-ny18
title: Investment Climate Survey 2005
title: JAM_2005_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/m8rz-8e97
title: Firm Analysis and Competitiveness Survey 2002
title: IND_2002_FACS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/4bbr-p726
title: Study of Competitiveness, Technology & Firm Linkages 2002
title: CHN_2002_CTFL_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/w6d7-tx53
title: Firm Analysis and Competitiveness Survey 2005
title: IND_2005_FACS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/b7xe-km71
title: Information and Communication Technology Survey 2006
title: IND_2006_ICT_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/26xn-5014
title: Employee Survey 2007
title: MYS_2007_Emp_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/k3bn-wx07
title: Productivity of the Investment Climate Private Enterprise Survey 2007
title: MYS_2007_PICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/p25d-ga90
title: Micro Investment Climate Survey 2006
title: IND_2006_ICSM_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/1qbf-k977
title: Retail Investment Climate Survey 2006
title: IND_2006_ICSR_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/3vf0-h942
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: URY_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/w4b8-1x85
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: PER_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/ry61-b069
title: Investment Climate Survey 2002
title: PAK_2002_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/9e23-yb04
title: Enterprise Survey 2007
title: PAK_2007_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/c8jw-8a29
title: Informal Survey 2010
title: GTM_2010_InS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/cvtk-x076
title: Investment Climate Survey 2004
title: LKA_2004_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/svjv-eq88
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: ECU_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/swpt-hk75
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: COL_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/cmfy-3v47
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: BOL_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/4dzw-mv69
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: CHL_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/ktfh-rf10
title: Investment Climate Survey 2003
title: SYR_2003_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/1na8-7e02
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: ARG_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/fyhz-jp55
title: Investment Climate Survey 2006
title: THA_2006_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/ea4g-a158
title: Enterprise Survey 2009
title: IDN_2009_ES_v02_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/2c47-px75
title: Investment Climate Survey 2004
title: THA_2004_ICS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/tx5j-kw28
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: BHS_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/zv6x-vv26
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: BRB_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/1s7j-xa25
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: GUY_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/zsdj-j839
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: DOM_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/7sz5-x195
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: MEX_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/qpb0-4438
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: HND_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/x0xf-vh63
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: SLV_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/d2hj-y791
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: KNA_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/ym4h-pa88
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: NIC_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/x9rr-z653
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: VCT_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/5j7k-9p54
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: VEN_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/rbcc-rq61
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: BLZ_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/ja0v-kh82
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: ATG_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/6d5j-c661
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: DMA_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/p50n-8917
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: SUR_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/dfh6-1a17
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: LCA_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/t90e-c358
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: PRY_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/wg6t-hj30
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: TTO_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/s6q8-5p25
title: Enterprise Survey 2011
title: IRQ_2011_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/ctgb-1k86
title: Enterprise Survey 2011
title: ZWE_2011_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/sse9-1649
title: Enterprise Survey 2011
title: CAF_2011_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/2yfa-wy56
title: Enterprise Survey 2011
title: LKA_2011_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/dmtj-md31
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: PAN_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/tx40-6w64
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: CRI_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/w10w-wv24
title: Management Practices Survey 2011
title: LKA_2011_MPS_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/qctz-wj62
title: Enterprise Survey 2012
title: RUS_2012_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/6gg6-gn79
title: Enterprise Survey 2010
title: JAM_2010_ES_v01_M_WB
DOI: 10.48529/nd63-my49
title: Enterprise Survey 2011
title: ETH_2011_ES_v01_M
DOI: 10.48529/2qtm-2n30
title: Micro-Enterprise Survey 2011
title: ETH_2011_MS_v01_M
DOI: 10.48529/kjsq-mx64
title: Enterprise Survey 2011
title: RWA_2011_ES_v01_M
DOI: 10.48529/6r84-vc59
title: Informal Survey 2011
title: RWA_2011_InS_v01_M
DOI: 10.48529/vs29-4792
title: Micro-Enterprise Survey 2011
title: RWA_2011_MS_v01_M
DOI: 10.48529/c1pn-y102
title: Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) Database 2011
title: COD_2011_FINDEX_v02_M
DOI: 10.48529/bn90-mr26
title: Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) Database 2011
title: ZAF_2011_FINDEX_v02_M