cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4445777.v5
title: A “Backward” Bayesian Method for Determination of Criteria for Making Go/No-Go Decisions in the Early Phases

description: We introduce a “backward” Bayesian method to assist sponsors formulating early phase Go/No-Go criteria based on the ultimate efficacy or safety target which is usually clearer for Phase 3. Derived from the definition of success for Phase 3, involving prior information and cost of later phases, this work presents the quantitative relationships among the following factors: previous and current study results, study designs (e.g., sample size, duration, or dose), true effect, target probability of success (PoS), expected financial loss, expected probability of terminating a potentially successful asset. An example is given to demonstrate how to accomplish these objectives for an exponential model describing the trajectory of weight loss. The expected loss and the probability of terminating a valuable compound are plotted against a range of criteria. The sponsors can then optimize the Go/No-Go criteria based on their tolerance for their objectives. This method can also be generalized to other nonlinear models. A byproduct of this work is to highlight the naivety of conventional gut feeling approaches in early internal decision making process by explicitly identifying the necessary, albeit elaborate, information and assumptions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4445777.v6
title: A “Backward” Bayesian Method for Determination of Criteria for Making Go/No-Go Decisions in the Early Phases

description: We introduce a “backward” Bayesian method to assist sponsors formulating early phase Go/No-Go criteria based on the ultimate efficacy or safety target, which is usually clearer for Phase 3. Derived from the definition of success for Phase 3, involving prior information and cost of later phases, this work presents the quantitative relationships among the following factors: previous and current study results, study designs (e.g., sample size, duration, or dose), true effect, target probability of success (PoS), expected financial loss, expected probability of terminating a potentially successful asset. An example is given to demonstrate how to accomplish these objectives for an exponential model describing the trajectory of weight loss. The expected loss and the probability of terminating a valuable compound are plotted against a range of criteria. The sponsors can then optimize the Go/No-Go criteria based on their tolerance for their objectives. This method can also be generalized to other nonlinear models. A byproduct of this work is to highlight the naivety of conventional gut feeling approaches in early internal decision-making process by explicitly identifying the necessary, albeit elaborate, information, and assumptions. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4445777.v7
title: A “Backward” Bayesian Method for Determination of Criteria for Making Go/No-Go Decisions in the Early Phases

description: We introduce a “backward” Bayesian method to assist sponsors formulating early phase Go/No-Go criteria based on the ultimate efficacy or safety target which is usually clearer for Phase 3. Derived from the definition of success for Phase 3, involving prior information and cost of later phases, this work presents the quantitative relationships among the following factors: previous and current study results, study designs (e.g., sample size, duration, or dose), true effect, target probability of success (PoS), expected financial loss, expected probability of terminating a potentially successful asset. An example is given to demonstrate how to accomplish these objectives for an exponential model describing the trajectory of weight loss. The expected loss and the probability of terminating a valuable compound are plotted against a range of criteria. The sponsors can then optimize the Go/No-Go criteria based on their tolerance for their objectives. This method can also be generalized to other nonlinear models. A byproduct of this work is to highlight the naivety of conventional gut feeling approaches in early internal decision making process by explicitly identifying the necessary, albeit elaborate, information and assumptions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4445777.v8
title: A “Backward” Bayesian Method for Determination of Criteria for Making Go/No-Go Decisions in the Early Phases

description: We introduce a “backward” Bayesian method to assist sponsors formulating early phase Go/No-Go criteria based on the ultimate efficacy or safety target, which is usually clearer for Phase 3. Derived from the definition of success for Phase 3, involving prior information and cost of later phases, this work presents the quantitative relationships among the following factors: previous and current study results, study designs (e.g., sample size, duration, or dose), true effect, target probability of success (PoS), expected financial loss, expected probability of terminating a potentially successful asset. An example is given to demonstrate how to accomplish these objectives for an exponential model describing the trajectory of weight loss. The expected loss and the probability of terminating a valuable compound are plotted against a range of criteria. The sponsors can then optimize the Go/No-Go criteria based on their tolerance for their objectives. This method can also be generalized to other nonlinear models. A byproduct of this work is to highlight the naivety of conventional gut feeling approaches in early internal decision-making process by explicitly identifying the necessary, albeit elaborate, information, and assumptions. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4445777.v9
title: A “Backward” Bayesian Method for Determination of Criteria for Making Go/No-Go Decisions in the Early Phases

description: We introduce a “backward” Bayesian method to assist sponsors formulating early phase Go/No-Go criteria based on the ultimate efficacy or safety target which is usually clearer for Phase 3. Derived from the definition of success for Phase 3, involving prior information and cost of later phases, this work presents the quantitative relationships among the following factors: previous and current study results, study designs (e.g., sample size, duration, or dose), true effect, target probability of success (PoS), expected financial loss, expected probability of terminating a potentially successful asset. An example is given to demonstrate how to accomplish these objectives for an exponential model describing the trajectory of weight loss. The expected loss and the probability of terminating a valuable compound are plotted against a range of criteria. The sponsors can then optimize the Go/No-Go criteria based on their tolerance for their objectives. This method can also be generalized to other nonlinear models. A byproduct of this work is to highlight the naivety of conventional gut feeling approaches in early internal decision making process by explicitly identifying the necessary, albeit elaborate, information and assumptions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4445777.v10
title: A “Backward” Bayesian Method for Determination of Criteria for Making Go/No-Go Decisions in the Early Phases

description: We introduce a “backward” Bayesian method to assist sponsors formulating early phase Go/No-Go criteria based on the ultimate efficacy or safety target, which is usually clearer for Phase 3. Derived from the definition of success for Phase 3, involving prior information and cost of later phases, this work presents the quantitative relationships among the following factors: previous and current study results, study designs (e.g., sample size, duration, or dose), true effect, target probability of success (PoS), expected financial loss, expected probability of terminating a potentially successful asset. An example is given to demonstrate how to accomplish these objectives for an exponential model describing the trajectory of weight loss. The expected loss and the probability of terminating a valuable compound are plotted against a range of criteria. The sponsors can then optimize the Go/No-Go criteria based on their tolerance for their objectives. This method can also be generalized to other nonlinear models. A byproduct of this work is to highlight the naivety of conventional gut feeling approaches in early internal decision-making process by explicitly identifying the necessary, albeit elaborate, information, and assumptions. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4445777.v11
title: A “Backward” Bayesian Method for Determination of Criteria for Making Go/No-Go Decisions in the Early Phases

description: We introduce a “backward” Bayesian method to assist sponsors formulating early phase Go/No-Go criteria based on the ultimate efficacy or safety target which is usually clearer for Phase 3. Derived from the definition of success for Phase 3, involving prior information and cost of later phases, this work presents the quantitative relationships among the following factors: previous and current study results, study designs (e.g., sample size, duration, or dose), true effect, target probability of success (PoS), expected financial loss, expected probability of terminating a potentially successful asset. An example is given to demonstrate how to accomplish these objectives for an exponential model describing the trajectory of weight loss. The expected loss and the probability of terminating a valuable compound are plotted against a range of criteria. The sponsors can then optimize the Go/No-Go criteria based on their tolerance for their objectives. This method can also be generalized to other nonlinear models. A byproduct of this work is to highlight the naivety of conventional gut feeling approaches in early internal decision making process by explicitly identifying the necessary, albeit elaborate, information and assumptions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4445777.v12
title: A “Backward” Bayesian Method for Determination of Criteria for Making Go/No-Go Decisions in the Early Phases

description: We introduce a “backward” Bayesian method to assist sponsors formulating early phase Go/No-Go criteria based on the ultimate efficacy or safety target, which is usually clearer for Phase 3. Derived from the definition of success for Phase 3, involving prior information and cost of later phases, this work presents the quantitative relationships among the following factors: previous and current study results, study designs (e.g., sample size, duration, or dose), true effect, target probability of success (PoS), expected financial loss, expected probability of terminating a potentially successful asset. An example is given to demonstrate how to accomplish these objectives for an exponential model describing the trajectory of weight loss. The expected loss and the probability of terminating a valuable compound are plotted against a range of criteria. The sponsors can then optimize the Go/No-Go criteria based on their tolerance for their objectives. This method can also be generalized to other nonlinear models. A byproduct of this work is to highlight the naivety of conventional gut feeling approaches in early internal decision-making process by explicitly identifying the necessary, albeit elaborate, information, and assumptions. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4445777.v13
title: A “Backward” Bayesian Method for Determination of Criteria for Making Go/No-Go Decisions in the Early Phases

description: We introduce a “backward” Bayesian method to assist sponsors formulating early phase Go/No-Go criteria based on the ultimate efficacy or safety target which is usually clearer for Phase 3. Derived from the definition of success for Phase 3, involving prior information and cost of later phases, this work presents the quantitative relationships among the following factors: previous and current study results, study designs (e.g., sample size, duration, or dose), true effect, target probability of success (PoS), expected financial loss, expected probability of terminating a potentially successful asset. An example is given to demonstrate how to accomplish these objectives for an exponential model describing the trajectory of weight loss. The expected loss and the probability of terminating a valuable compound are plotted against a range of criteria. The sponsors can then optimize the Go/No-Go criteria based on their tolerance for their objectives. This method can also be generalized to other nonlinear models. A byproduct of this work is to highlight the naivety of conventional gut feeling approaches in early internal decision making process by explicitly identifying the necessary, albeit elaborate, information and assumptions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4445777.v14
title: A “Backward” Bayesian Method for Determination of Criteria for Making Go/No-Go Decisions in the Early Phases

description: We introduce a “backward” Bayesian method to assist sponsors formulating early phase Go/No-Go criteria based on the ultimate efficacy or safety target, which is usually clearer for Phase 3. Derived from the definition of success for Phase 3, involving prior information and cost of later phases, this work presents the quantitative relationships among the following factors: previous and current study results, study designs (e.g., sample size, duration, or dose), true effect, target probability of success (PoS), expected financial loss, expected probability of terminating a potentially successful asset. An example is given to demonstrate how to accomplish these objectives for an exponential model describing the trajectory of weight loss. The expected loss and the probability of terminating a valuable compound are plotted against a range of criteria. The sponsors can then optimize the Go/No-Go criteria based on their tolerance for their objectives. This method can also be generalized to other nonlinear models. A byproduct of this work is to highlight the naivety of conventional gut feeling approaches in early internal decision-making process by explicitly identifying the necessary, albeit elaborate, information, and assumptions. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4445777.v15
title: A “Backward” Bayesian Method for Determination of Criteria for Making Go/No-Go Decisions in the Early Phases

description: We introduce a “backward” Bayesian method to assist sponsors formulating early phase Go/No-Go criteria based on the ultimate efficacy or safety target which is usually clearer for Phase 3. Derived from the definition of success for Phase 3, involving prior information and cost of later phases, this work presents the quantitative relationships among the following factors: previous and current study results, study designs (e.g., sample size, duration, or dose), true effect, target probability of success (PoS), expected financial loss, expected probability of terminating a potentially successful asset. An example is given to demonstrate how to accomplish these objectives for an exponential model describing the trajectory of weight loss. The expected loss and the probability of terminating a valuable compound are plotted against a range of criteria. The sponsors can then optimize the Go/No-Go criteria based on their tolerance for their objectives. This method can also be generalized to other nonlinear models. A byproduct of this work is to highlight the naivety of conventional gut feeling approaches in early internal decision making process by explicitly identifying the necessary, albeit elaborate, information and assumptions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4445777.v16
title: A “Backward” Bayesian Method for Determination of Criteria for Making Go/No-Go Decisions in the Early Phases

description: We introduce a “backward” Bayesian method to assist sponsors formulating early phase Go/No-Go criteria based on the ultimate efficacy or safety target, which is usually clearer for Phase 3. Derived from the definition of success for Phase 3, involving prior information and cost of later phases, this work presents the quantitative relationships among the following factors: previous and current study results, study designs (e.g., sample size, duration, or dose), true effect, target probability of success (PoS), expected financial loss, expected probability of terminating a potentially successful asset. An example is given to demonstrate how to accomplish these objectives for an exponential model describing the trajectory of weight loss. The expected loss and the probability of terminating a valuable compound are plotted against a range of criteria. The sponsors can then optimize the Go/No-Go criteria based on their tolerance for their objectives. This method can also be generalized to other nonlinear models. A byproduct of this work is to highlight the naivety of conventional gut feeling approaches in early internal decision-making process by explicitly identifying the necessary, albeit elaborate, information, and assumptions. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4445777.v17
title: A “Backward” Bayesian Method for Determination of Criteria for Making Go/No-Go Decisions in the Early Phases

description: We introduce a “backward” Bayesian method to assist sponsors formulating early phase Go/No-Go criteria based on the ultimate efficacy or safety target which is usually clearer for Phase 3. Derived from the definition of success for Phase 3, involving prior information and cost of later phases, this work presents the quantitative relationships among the following factors: previous and current study results, study designs (e.g., sample size, duration, or dose), true effect, target probability of success (PoS), expected financial loss, expected probability of terminating a potentially successful asset. An example is given to demonstrate how to accomplish these objectives for an exponential model describing the trajectory of weight loss. The expected loss and the probability of terminating a valuable compound are plotted against a range of criteria. The sponsors can then optimize the Go/No-Go criteria based on their tolerance for their objectives. This method can also be generalized to other nonlinear models. A byproduct of this work is to highlight the naivety of conventional gut feeling approaches in early internal decision making process by explicitly identifying the necessary, albeit elaborate, information and assumptions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4445777.v18
title: A “Backward” Bayesian Method for Determination of Criteria for Making Go/No-Go Decisions in the Early Phases

description: We introduce a “backward” Bayesian method to assist sponsors formulating early phase Go/No-Go criteria based on the ultimate efficacy or safety target, which is usually clearer for Phase 3. Derived from the definition of success for Phase 3, involving prior information and cost of later phases, this work presents the quantitative relationships among the following factors: previous and current study results, study designs (e.g., sample size, duration, or dose), true effect, target probability of success (PoS), expected financial loss, expected probability of terminating a potentially successful asset. An example is given to demonstrate how to accomplish these objectives for an exponential model describing the trajectory of weight loss. The expected loss and the probability of terminating a valuable compound are plotted against a range of criteria. The sponsors can then optimize the Go/No-Go criteria based on their tolerance for their objectives. This method can also be generalized to other nonlinear models. A byproduct of this work is to highlight the naivety of conventional gut feeling approaches in early internal decision-making process by explicitly identifying the necessary, albeit elaborate, information, and assumptions. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4445777
title: A “Backward” Bayesian Method for Determination of Criteria for Making Go/No-Go Decisions in the Early Phases

description: We introduce a “backward” Bayesian method to assist sponsors formulating early phase Go/No-Go criteria based on the ultimate efficacy or safety target which is usually clearer for Phase 3. Derived from the definition of success for Phase 3, involving prior information and cost of later phases, this work presents the quantitative relationships among the following factors: previous and current study results, study designs (e.g., sample size, duration, or dose), true effect, target probability of success (PoS), expected financial loss, expected probability of terminating a potentially successful asset. An example is given to demonstrate how to accomplish these objectives for an exponential model describing the trajectory of weight loss. The expected loss and the probability of terminating a valuable compound are plotted against a range of criteria. The sponsors can then optimize the Go/No-Go criteria based on their tolerance for their objectives. This method can also be generalized to other nonlinear models. A byproduct of this work is to highlight the naivety of conventional gut feeling approaches in early internal decision making process by explicitly identifying the necessary, albeit elaborate, information and assumptions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4445777.v20
title: A “Backward” Bayesian Method for Determination of Criteria for Making Go/No-Go Decisions in the Early Phases

description: We introduce a “backward” Bayesian method to assist sponsors formulating early phase Go/No-Go criteria based on the ultimate efficacy or safety target, which is usually clearer for Phase 3. Derived from the definition of success for Phase 3, involving prior information and cost of later phases, this work presents the quantitative relationships among the following factors: previous and current study results, study designs (e.g., sample size, duration, or dose), true effect, target probability of success (PoS), expected financial loss, expected probability of terminating a potentially successful asset. An example is given to demonstrate how to accomplish these objectives for an exponential model describing the trajectory of weight loss. The expected loss and the probability of terminating a valuable compound are plotted against a range of criteria. The sponsors can then optimize the Go/No-Go criteria based on their tolerance for their objectives. This method can also be generalized to other nonlinear models. A byproduct of this work is to highlight the naivety of conventional gut feeling approaches in early internal decision-making process by explicitly identifying the necessary, albeit elaborate, information, and assumptions. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.