cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.15468/dl.x4mft8
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 313950 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 "TaxonKey is Taraxacum officinale Weber ex F.H.Wigg."
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 313950 records from 1053 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0290793-200613084148143/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.ayi3lm
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 70177 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "TaxonKey is Salix purpurea L.",
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 70177 records from 304 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0010883-181003121212138/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15138050
title: Table 1 in New species of the cuckoo bee genus Austrosphecodes Michener, 1978 (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Sphecodini) and a key for Brazilian species

description: Table 1. Sculpture terminology used here, modified from Harris (1978). Abbreviations: i =puncture interspaces; pd = puncture diameter.
ClassTermDescriptionMicrosculpturepolishedsmooth, shiny, not microsculpturedlineolatelongitudinally marked with very fine raised or depressed linesimbricatepartly overlapping and appearing like shingles on a roof or scales on a fishMicrosculpture modificatorsstrong(ly)dense, giving a dull appearanceweak(ly)not dense, sometimes with a polished appea- rancePuncturesimpunctatenot puncturedset with fine, impressed points or punctures appearing as pin-pricks; ordinary, mean sizedpunctatepuncturessmaller punctures (less than 0.5 puncture diameter); finely punctate; with numerouspunctulateminute and close set puncturespuncticulatesparsely punctate with very fine, widely spaced puncturesPuncture modificatorsno modificator regarding interspacesi =pddenselyi <pdcontiguouswithout clear interspaces among puncturescrowdedpunctures deformed by contactsparselyi =2–3 pdvery sparselyi several times larger than pd, i> 3 pdimpressedwell defined, not swallowedshallowweakly impressed, not deepOrnamentation[combination of terms with -]an intergrade of two patterns, with predominant ornamentation firstareolatedivided into a number of small irregular spacescarinatewith narrow longitudinal raised ridges, mostly parallelrugosewrinkled. Wrinkles larger than regular punc- tures.ruguloseminutely rugose; minutely wrinkled. Wrinkles similar in size with regular punctures.strigatewith narrow, transverse irregular raised ridges, mostly parallelscrobiculatewith short oblong hollows
description: Published as part of Gonçalves, Rodrigo Barbosa & Pereira, Felipe Walter, 2022, New species of the cuckoo bee genus Austrosphecodes Michener, 1978 (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Sphecodini) and a key for Brazilian species, pp. 57 in European Journal of Taxonomy 819 on page 57, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.819.1777, http://zenodo.org/record/6544410
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15138051
title: Table 2 in New species of the cuckoo bee genus Austrosphecodes Michener, 1978 (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Sphecodini) and a key for Brazilian species

description: Table 2. Species of Austrosphecodes Michener, 1978, depositories, type localities and recent descriptions/ redescriptions.
SpeciesDepositoryType localityRecent studies1A. andinus (Schrottky, 1906)MLPArgentina, CatamarcaGonçalves (2017)2A. arequipae (Meyer, 1925)NMWPeru3A. argentinus (Schrottky, 1906)unknownArgentina, Catamarca4A. asmodeus sp. nov.DZUPBrazil, Paranáthis study5A. balrog sp. nov.DZUPBrazil, Paranáthis study6A. bogotensis (Meyer, 1922)ZMBColombia7A. bonaerensis (Holmberg, 1886)type lostArgentina, Buenos Aires8A. brasiliensis (Schrottky, 1910)MZSPBrazilGonçalves (2017)19A. bruchi (Schrottky, 1906)MLPArgentina, CatamarcaGonçalves (2017)10A. cerberus sp. nov.DZUPBrazil, Paranáthis study11A. chilensis (Spinola, 1851)MSNTChile12A. convergens (Michener, 1978)KUNHMArgentina, NeuquénGonçalves (2017)13A. cordillerensis (Jörgensen, 1912)MLPArgentina, MendozaGonçalves (2017)14A. costaricensis (Friese, 1916)ZMBCosta Rica15A. equator (Vachal, 1904)MNHPEcuador16A. friesei (Herbst, 1908)unknownChile17A. gorgon sp. nov.DZUPBrazil, Paranáthis study18A. granulosus (Sichel, 1865)MNHPChile19A. kampus sp. nov.DZUPBrazil, Santa Catarinathis study20A. inornatus (Schrottky, 1902)MZSPBrazil, São PauloGonçalves (2017)21A. joergenseni (Meyer, 1920)MHNPArgentina, MendozaGonçalves (2017)22A. jurupari sp. nov.DZUPBrazil, Amazonasthis study23A. laetus (Meyer, 1922)ZMBArgentina, Tucuman24A. lucifer sp. nov.DZUPBrazil, Rio Grande do Sulthis study25A. lunaris (Vachal, 1904)MNHPArgentina, Tucumanthis study26A. melanopus (Schrottky, 1906)MLPArgentina, Río Ne- gro-NeuquénGonçalves (2017)27A. mendocinus (Jöergensen, 1912)MLPArgentina, MendozaGonçalves (2017)28A. minarum (Schrottky, 1910)MZSPBrazil, Minas GeraisGonçalves (2017)39A. mutillaeformis (Schrottky, 1906)unknownArgentina, Catamarca30A. orcus sp. nov.DZUPBrazil, Minas Geraisthis study31A. pallitarsis (Vachal, 1909)MNHPBolivia32A. paraguayensis (Schrottky, 1906)unknownParaguay, Villa Encarnación33A. patagonicus (Schrottky, 1906)unknownArgentina34A. peruensis (Meyer, 1925)HNHMPeru35A. rufiscapis (Vachal, 1909)MNHPPeru36A. rugulosus (Sichel, 1865)MNHPChile37A. tartarus sp. nov.DZUPBrazil, Paranáthis study38A. vachali (Meyer, 1925)HNHMPeru
description: Published as part of Gonçalves, Rodrigo Barbosa & Pereira, Felipe Walter, 2022, New species of the cuckoo bee genus Austrosphecodes Michener, 1978 (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Sphecodini) and a key for Brazilian species, pp. 87 in European Journal of Taxonomy 819 on page 87, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.819.1777, http://zenodo.org/record/6544410
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15138052
title: Table 2 in New species of the cuckoo bee genus Austrosphecodes Michener, 1978 (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Sphecodini) and a key for Brazilian species

description: Table 2. Species of Austrosphecodes Michener, 1978, depositories, type localities and recent descriptions/ redescriptions.
SpeciesDepositoryType localityRecent studies1A. andinus (Schrottky, 1906)MLPArgentina, CatamarcaGonçalves (2017)2A. arequipae (Meyer, 1925)NMWPeru3A. argentinus (Schrottky, 1906)unknownArgentina, Catamarca4A. asmodeus sp. nov.DZUPBrazil, Paranáthis study5A. balrog sp. nov.DZUPBrazil, Paranáthis study6A. bogotensis (Meyer, 1922)ZMBColombia7A. bonaerensis (Holmberg, 1886)type lostArgentina, Buenos Aires8A. brasiliensis (Schrottky, 1910)MZSPBrazilGonçalves (2017)19A. bruchi (Schrottky, 1906)MLPArgentina, CatamarcaGonçalves (2017)10A. cerberus sp. nov.DZUPBrazil, Paranáthis study11A. chilensis (Spinola, 1851)MSNTChile12A. convergens (Michener, 1978)KUNHMArgentina, NeuquénGonçalves (2017)13A. cordillerensis (Jörgensen, 1912)MLPArgentina, MendozaGonçalves (2017)14A. costaricensis (Friese, 1916)ZMBCosta Rica15A. equator (Vachal, 1904)MNHPEcuador16A. friesei (Herbst, 1908)unknownChile17A. gorgon sp. nov.DZUPBrazil, Paranáthis study18A. granulosus (Sichel, 1865)MNHPChile19A. kampus sp. nov.DZUPBrazil, Santa Catarinathis study20A. inornatus (Schrottky, 1902)MZSPBrazil, São PauloGonçalves (2017)21A. joergenseni (Meyer, 1920)MHNPArgentina, MendozaGonçalves (2017)22A. jurupari sp. nov.DZUPBrazil, Amazonasthis study23A. laetus (Meyer, 1922)ZMBArgentina, Tucuman24A. lucifer sp. nov.DZUPBrazil, Rio Grande do Sulthis study25A. lunaris (Vachal, 1904)MNHPArgentina, Tucumanthis study26A. melanopus (Schrottky, 1906)MLPArgentina, Río Ne- gro-NeuquénGonçalves (2017)27A. mendocinus (Jöergensen, 1912)MLPArgentina, MendozaGonçalves (2017)28A. minarum (Schrottky, 1910)MZSPBrazil, Minas GeraisGonçalves (2017)39A. mutillaeformis (Schrottky, 1906)unknownArgentina, Catamarca30A. orcus sp. nov.DZUPBrazil, Minas Geraisthis study31A. pallitarsis (Vachal, 1909)MNHPBolivia32A. paraguayensis (Schrottky, 1906)unknownParaguay, Villa Encarnación33A. patagonicus (Schrottky, 1906)unknownArgentina34A. peruensis (Meyer, 1925)HNHMPeru35A. rufiscapis (Vachal, 1909)MNHPPeru36A. rugulosus (Sichel, 1865)MNHPChile37A. tartarus sp. nov.DZUPBrazil, Paranáthis study38A. vachali (Meyer, 1925)HNHMPeru
description: Published as part of Gonçalves, Rodrigo Barbosa & Pereira, Felipe Walter, 2022, New species of the cuckoo bee genus Austrosphecodes Michener, 1978 (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Sphecodini) and a key for Brazilian species, pp. 87 in European Journal of Taxonomy 819 on page 87, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.819.1777, http://zenodo.org/record/6544410
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15138057
title: Table 1 in A taxonomic revision of Schoenus cuspidatus and allies (Cyperaceae, tribe Schoeneae) - Part 1 *

description: Table 1 Character list used for the morphological study of Schoenus cuspidatus and allies.
CharacterNumber ofUnit ofobservations/specimenmeasurementSheath firm (versus membranaceous)3Yes/noLeaves per culm3CountBasal leaf length3mm (ruler)Basal leaf width (measured near3mm (graticule)mid-point)Basal leaf straight (versus curled)3Yes/noLigule length3mm (graticule)Leaf channelled immediately above3Yes/noliguleHairs present above ligule3Yes/noLeaves with serrate margin above3Yes/noliguleCulm height3mm (ruler)Culm width (measured near3mm (graticule)mid-point)Proximal primary inflorescence bract3mm (ruler)lengthInflorescence length3mm (ruler)Inflorescence width3mm (ruler)Spike length3mm (ruler)Proximal rachis length3mm (ruler)Subproximal rachis length3mm (ruler)Proximal primary inflorescence bract3Yes/nonotably veinedProximal primary inflorescence bract3Yes/noexpanded at baseNumber of spikes per inflorescence3CountNumber of spikelets per spike3CountRachilla length9mm (graticule)Spikelet prophyll length6mm (graticule)Spikelet prophyll mucro length6mm (graticule)Number of glumes per spikelet9CountProximal glume length3mm (graticule)Proximal glume mucro length3mm (graticule)Subproximal glume length3mm (graticule)Subproximal glume mucro length3mm (graticule)Spikelet length6mm (graticule)Spikelet width6mm (graticule)Nutlet length6mm (graticule)Nutlet beak length2mm (graticule)Nutlet width6mm (graticule)Anther length6mm (graticule)Number of stigmas per bisexual floret2–5CountNumber of stamens per floret2–6CountPerianth bristles1–manyYes/no; count ifpossible
description: Published as part of Elliott, T. L., Barrett, R. L. & Muasya, A. M., 2019, A taxonomic revision of Schoenus cuspidatus and allies (Cyperaceae, tribe Schoeneae) - Part 1 *, pp. 521 in South African Journal of Botany 121 on page 521, DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2018.11.021, http://zenodo.org/record/10496596
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15138058
title: Table 1 in A taxonomic revision of Schoenus cuspidatus and allies (Cyperaceae, tribe Schoeneae) - Part 1 *

description: Table 1 Character list used for the morphological study of Schoenus cuspidatus and allies.
CharacterNumber ofUnit ofobservations/specimenmeasurementSheath firm (versus membranaceous)3Yes/noLeaves per culm3CountBasal leaf length3mm (ruler)Basal leaf width (measured near3mm (graticule)mid-point)Basal leaf straight (versus curled)3Yes/noLigule length3mm (graticule)Leaf channelled immediately above3Yes/noliguleHairs present above ligule3Yes/noLeaves with serrate margin above3Yes/noliguleCulm height3mm (ruler)Culm width (measured near3mm (graticule)mid-point)Proximal primary inflorescence bract3mm (ruler)lengthInflorescence length3mm (ruler)Inflorescence width3mm (ruler)Spike length3mm (ruler)Proximal rachis length3mm (ruler)Subproximal rachis length3mm (ruler)Proximal primary inflorescence bract3Yes/nonotably veinedProximal primary inflorescence bract3Yes/noexpanded at baseNumber of spikes per inflorescence3CountNumber of spikelets per spike3CountRachilla length9mm (graticule)Spikelet prophyll length6mm (graticule)Spikelet prophyll mucro length6mm (graticule)Number of glumes per spikelet9CountProximal glume length3mm (graticule)Proximal glume mucro length3mm (graticule)Subproximal glume length3mm (graticule)Subproximal glume mucro length3mm (graticule)Spikelet length6mm (graticule)Spikelet width6mm (graticule)Nutlet length6mm (graticule)Nutlet beak length2mm (graticule)Nutlet width6mm (graticule)Anther length6mm (graticule)Number of stigmas per bisexual floret2–5CountNumber of stamens per floret2–6CountPerianth bristles1–manyYes/no; count ifpossible
description: Published as part of Elliott, T. L., Barrett, R. L. & Muasya, A. M., 2019, A taxonomic revision of Schoenus cuspidatus and allies (Cyperaceae, tribe Schoeneae) - Part 1 *, pp. 521 in South African Journal of Botany 121 on page 521, DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2018.11.021, http://zenodo.org/record/10496596
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15138060
title: TABLE 1 in Revision of the genus Apterodela Rivalier, 1950 (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae)

description: TABLE 1. Multiple comparisons of HW/PW and TL/BH in Chinese species of Apterodela (s. str.) by Tukey HSD -test.
HW/PW TL/BHA. kazantsevi ♂ M = 1.4679A. kazantsevi ♀ M = 1.5391A. latissima sp. nov. ♂ M = 1.4119A. lobipennis ♂ M = 1.4141A. lobipennis ♀ M = 1.3720A. bivirgulata ♂ M = 1.3239A. bivirgulata ♀ M = 1.2809A. alopecomma sp. nov. ♂ M = 1.3034A. alopecomma sp. nov. ♀ M = 1.2687A. kazantsevi ♂ M = 4.30630.4261150.9093520.3602090.0036320.0000100.0000100.0000110.000011A. kazantsevi ♀ M = 3.74690.0009680.0665880.000680.0000100.0000100.0000100.0000100.000010A. latissima sp. nov. ♂ M = 4.13940.9887340.3093211.0000000.9752460.2288920.0065600.1244660.035904A. lobipennis ♂ M = 4.33810.9999980.0000100.9118700.1147160.0000100.0000100.0000130.000043A. lobipennis ♀ M = 3.87120.0037500.9572120.6951530.0000100.0108110.0000100.0468830.021189A. bivirgulata ♂ M = 3.88450.0014070.8644650.6961500.0000101.0000000.0004590.9813920.609619A. bivirgulata ♀ M = 3.56470.0000100.5893990.0021900.0000100.0000290.0000100.9701090.999974A. alopecomma sp. nov. ♂ M = 4.06230.5756880.1464050.9999250.0291920.4930180.3856900.0000100.983159A. alopecomma sp. nov. ♀ M = 3.77000.0490601.0000000.6456480.0031600.9991090.9969340.8888210.662427
Note: marked by bold differences are significant at p <0.05; underlined values are showed the significant differences in males and females of the same species.
description: Published as part of Matalin, Andrey V., Wiesner, Jürgen, Xiong, Xinxin & Araki, Takashi, 2024, Revision of the genus Apterodela Rivalier, 1950 (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae), pp. 335 in Zootaxa 5405 (3) on page 335, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5405.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/10603727
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15138083
title: Table 1 in Cladistic analysis and description of a new species of the Brazilian genus Atlantodesmus Hoffman, 2000 (Diplopoda: Polydesmida: Chelodesmidae)

description: Table 1. Morphological matrix for the cladistic analysis of the genus Atlantodesmus Hoffman, 2000. – = inapplicable characters;? = unobserved characters. All characters were treated as nonadditive.
TerminalsCharacters000000000111111111122222222223123456789012345678901234567890Brasilodesmus paulistus100010001100011000010––0000–00Macrocoxodesmus marcusi100011111111120120100––0001210Plectrogonodesmus gounellei0–0–1110–1–1110120000––0001010Leiodesmus sp.110011111011120110000––0000–??Arthrosolaenomeris pantalanensis110011111011010110011100000–10Atlantodesmus teresa0–1100000120111101101020001110Atlantodesmus eimeri110110000120110101101110111110Atlantodesmus pickeli100–000001201200001010201011––Atlantodesmus pintoi120000000120100001101021101121Atlantodesmus itapurensis0–0010000100110101001121001121Atlantodesmus sierwaldae sp. nov.1101000001201101010011110111––
description: Published as part of Bouzan, Rodrigo Salvador, Iniesta, Luiz Felipe Moretti & Brescovit, Antonio Domingos, 2019, Cladistic analysis and description of a new species of the Brazilian genus Atlantodesmus Hoffman, 2000 (Diplopoda: Polydesmida: Chelodesmidae), pp. 3 in European Journal of Taxonomy 538 on page 3, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2019.538, http://zenodo.org/record/3346493
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15138087
title: Table 2 in Cladistic analysis and description of a new species of the Brazilian genus Atlantodesmus Hoffman, 2000 (Diplopoda: Polydesmida: Chelodesmidae)

description: Table 2 (continued next page). List of character and character states used in the cladistic analysis of the genus Atlantodesmus Hoffman, 2000.
# Character Character state(1)Coloration of the body rings (Pena-Barbosa et al. 2013, character #6): 0 – Uniform; 1 – Not uniform (Fig. 3).(2)Patches of color on the paranota: 0 – On lateral margin (Fig. 4A); 1 – Extended to posterior edge (Fig. 4C); 2 – On central area (Fig. 4B).(3)Tegument of the body rings: 0 – Smooth (Fig. 4 A–C); 1 – Granular (Fig. 4D).(4)Edge of the lateral projection on the seventh sternite: 0 – Smooth (Fig. 4A); 1 – Serrated (Fig. 4B).(5)Ventral projection on the fourth sternite: 0 – Absent; 1 – Present (Fig. 5C).(6)Ventral projection on the fifth sternite: 0 – Absent; 1 – Present (Fig. 5D).(7)Ventral projection on the sixth sternite (Pena-Barbosa et al., 2013, character #9): 0 – Absent; 1 – Present.(8)Ventral projection on the seventh sternite (Pena-Barbosa et al., 2013, character #10): 0 – Absent; 1 – Present.(9)Ventral projection on the sternites just after the gonopods (Pena-Barbosa et al., 2013, character #18): 0 – Absent; 1 – Present.(10)Shape of the posterior edge of the paranota (Pena-Barbosa et al., 2013, character #21): 0 – Rounded (Fig. 5E); 1 – Acuminate (Fig. 5F).(11)Paranota alignment in oral view (Pena-Barbosa et al., 2013, character #13): 0 – Straigth; 1 – Curved ventrad; 2 – Curved dorsad.(12)Dorsal lobe on the prefemur of the fifth leg (Pena-Barbosa et al., 2013, character #16): 0 – Absent; 1 – Present.(13)Folds on the aperture of the gonopod (Pena-Barbosa et al., 2013, character #20): 0 – Absent; 1 – Present (Fig. 6A).(14)Posterior edge of gonopod aperture (Pena-Barbosa et al., 2013, character #23): 0 – Not extended to coxae of the legs; 1 – Extended up to half of the coxae; 2 – Exceeding the coxae.(15)Coxal apophysis (Pena-Barbosa et al., 2013, character #27): 0 – Absent; 1 – Present.(16)Setae on the gonocoxae: 0 – Two setae; 1 – A row of setae.(17)Shape of the projection on the gonocoxae: 0 – Oval; 1 – Subtriangular; 2 – Digitiform.(18)Folds on dorsal edge of the prefemoral region: 0 – Absent; 1 – Present (Fig. 6B).(19)Prefemoral process: 0 – Smooth (Fig. 6C); 1 – Serrated (Fig. 6D).(20)Projection on prefemoral process (Pena-Barbosa et al., 2013, character #47): 0 – Absent; 1 – Present.
description: Published as part of Bouzan, Rodrigo Salvador, Iniesta, Luiz Felipe Moretti & Brescovit, Antonio Domingos, 2019, Cladistic analysis and description of a new species of the Brazilian genus Atlantodesmus Hoffman, 2000 (Diplopoda: Polydesmida: Chelodesmidae), pp. 4 in European Journal of Taxonomy 538 on page 4, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2019.538, http://zenodo.org/record/3346493
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15138090
title: Table 2 in Cladistic analysis and description of a new species of the Brazilian genus Atlantodesmus Hoffman, 2000 (Diplopoda: Polydesmida: Chelodesmidae)

description: Table 2 (continued). List of character and character states used in the cladistic analysis of the genus Atlantodesmus Hoffman, 2000.
# Character Character state(21)Cingulum: 0 – Absent; 1 – Present.(22)Shape of the cingulum: 0 – Reduced; 1 – Well-developed (Fig. 2E–F).(23)Cingulum position: 0 – Medial; 1 – Proximal; 2 – Submedial.(24)Acropodite incision in mesal view: 0 – Absent; 1 – Present.(25)Lobe on the basis of the solenomere: 0 – Absent; 1 – Present.(26)Lateral membrane of the process of the acropodite: 0 – Absent; 1 – Present.(27)Solenomere branching: 0 – Absent; 1 – Present.(28)Position of the solenomere branching: 0 – Apical; 1 – Medial; 2 – Proximal.(29)Shape of the vulva in ventral view (Pena-Barbosa et al., 2013, character #46): 0 – Circular; 1 – Oval; 2 – Triangular.(30)Shape of the apex of the vulva: 0 – Rounded; 1 – Triangular.
description: Published as part of Bouzan, Rodrigo Salvador, Iniesta, Luiz Felipe Moretti & Brescovit, Antonio Domingos, 2019, Cladistic analysis and description of a new species of the Brazilian genus Atlantodesmus Hoffman, 2000 (Diplopoda: Polydesmida: Chelodesmidae), pp. 5 in European Journal of Taxonomy 538 on page 5, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2019.538, http://zenodo.org/record/3346493
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15138100
title: Table 2 in Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation

description: Table 2. Characters distinguishing species of the P. glabra complex.
SpeciesLeaf shapeLeaf lengthLeaf widthLeaf apexLeaf-surface textureLeaf hairsStem hairsStipulesBranching patternInflorescence internodeFertile bractsPedicelCalyx hairinessBracteole textureBracteole hairsKeel colourP. aculeataLinear3.6–14 (6.7)0.4–0.8 (0.6)Long pungent apiculusMamilloseSparseHairySplayedIrregularly pinnateNormalLargerShortVillousPaperyHairy at least at baseRedP. cypraeifoliaObovate2.3–3.9 (3.3)0.7–1.0 (0.8)Rounded, no a-oculusMamilloseAbsentHairyStraightIrregularly pinnateNormalSameShortGlabrousPaperyGlabrousRedP. flexilisOblong12.4–19.6 (14.7)2.7–3.9 (3.3)Short apiculusGranularAbsentShort stiff antrorse hairsStraightIrregularly pinnateNormalSameLongGlabrousCoriaceousGlabrousYellowP. furcataLinear7.3–18.7 (12.0)0.4–1.0 (0.7)Short apiculusMamilloseAbsentGlabrousSplayedFurcateCompressedLargerShortVillousCoriaceousVillousYellowP. glabraOblanceolate9.4–20.9 (14.5)0.8–2.1 (1.4)Short apiculusGranularAbsentGlabrousStraightFurcateCompressedLargerShortGlabrousCoriaceousGlabrousGreen– yellowP. glabra x flexilisOblanceolate11.7–22.4 (16.3)1.5–2.8 (1.9)Short apiculusGranularAbsentGlabrous or with a few scattered hairsStraightIrregularly pinnateNormalLargerLongGlabrousCoriaceousGlabrousYellowP. mutabilis var. mutabilisOblanceolate9.8–21.7 (15.2)1.3–3.1 (2.0)Short apiculusGranularSparseSparsely hairyStraightIrregularly pinnateNormalSmallerShortShort antrorse hairsPaperyHairs on keelYellowP. mutabilis var. angustaLinear6.1–18.3 (11.1)0.4–1.0 (0.7)Short apiculusGranularSparseSparsely hairyStraightIrregularly pinnateNormalSmallerShortShort antrorse hairsPaperyHairy on keelYellowP. praecipua subsp. praecipuaOblanceolate9.2–21.6 (13.9)0.6–2.1 (1.2)Short apiculusMamilloseSparseGlabrous to sparsely hairySplayedIrregularly pinnateNormalSameShortShort hairsPaperyHairs on keelRedP. praecipua subsp. temperataLinear6–21.2 (14.1)0.6–1.2 (0.8)Pungent apiculusMamilloseSparseSparsely hairySplayedIrregularly pinnateNormalSameSessileSparsely hairyPaperyHairs on keel–P. tenebrossaLinear5.7–16.6 (11.1)0.4–0.8 (0.5)Pungent apiculusGranularAbsentGlabrous or with spreading hairsRecurvedFurcateNormalLargerSessileLong spreading hairsCoriaceousGlabrousYellow– orangeP. weindorferiOblanceolate5.9–15.0 (10.4)0.4–2.0 (0.9)No apiculusMamilloseAbsentGlabrousStraightFurcateCompressedLargerShortGlabrousCoriaceousGlabrousYellow
description: Published as part of Renner, Matthew A. M., Barrett, Russell L., Clarke, Steve, Clugston, James A. R. & Wilson, Peter H. Weston Trevor C., 2022, Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation, pp. 243 in Australian Systematic Botany 35 (3) on page 243, DOI: 10.1071/SB21030, http://zenodo.org/record/11048683