cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr34822.v1
title: Violence Risk Assessment and Risk Communication, 1996-1998
title: Version 1

description: This data collection is designed to examine factors influencing the validity of violence risk assessment and risk communication, and it covers three surveys: (1) 1996 Clinical Judgements Survey, (2) 1997 Dangerousness Survey, and (3) 1998 Survey. In all three surveys, forensic psychologists and psychiatrists were shown case summaries of patients hospitalized with mental disorders and were asked to judge the likelihood that the patient would harm someone within six months after discharge from the hospital. The respondents also judged whether the patients posed a high risk, medium risk, or low risk of harming someone after discharge, how closely the mental health center is recommended to monitor the patient's condition, and the likelihood of rehospitalization. Other background information were collected regarding the respondents' assessments distribution, average number of patients per week, and opinions on survey formats. Demographic on respondents includes age, gender, year receiving the doctor's degree, and whether they work for forensic facility full-time or consult for courts.
description: Please refer to the Original P.I. Documentation in the ICPSR Codebook for information on study design.
description: Response Rates: (1) 28 percent (2) 42.6 percent (3) 46.6 percent. Please refer to the Original P.I. Documentation in the ICPSR Codebook for addtional information on responce rates.
description: Please refer to the Original P.I. Documentation in the ICPSR Codebook for information on sampling.
description: Datasets: DS0: Study-Level Files DS1: 1996 Clinical Judgements Survey DS2: 1997 Dangerousness Survey DS3: 1998 Survey
description: All members of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law (AAPL).
description: self-enumerated questionnaire
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr34822
title: Violence Risk Assessment and Risk Communication, 1996-1998
title: Archival Version

description: This data collection is designed to examine factors influencing the validity of violence risk assessment and risk communication, and it covers three surveys: (1) 1996 Clinical Judgements Survey, (2) 1997 Dangerousness Survey, and (3) 1998 Survey. In all three surveys, forensic psychologists and psychiatrists were shown case summaries of patients hospitalized with mental disorders and were asked to judge the likelihood that the patient would harm someone within six months after discharge from the hospital. The respondents also judged whether the patients posed a high risk, medium risk, or low risk of harming someone after discharge, how closely the mental health center is recommended to monitor the patient's condition, and the likelihood of rehospitalization. Other background information were collected regarding the respondents' assessments distribution, average number of patients per week, and opinions on survey formats. Demographic on respondents includes age, gender, year receiving the doctor's degree, and whether they work for forensic facility full-time or consult for courts.
description: Please refer to the Original P.I. Documentation in the ICPSR Codebook for information on study design.
description: Response Rates: (1) 28 percent (2) 42.6 percent (3) 46.6 percent. Please refer to the Original P.I. Documentation in the ICPSR Codebook for addtional information on responce rates.
description: Please refer to the Original P.I. Documentation in the ICPSR Codebook for information on sampling.
description: Datasets: DS0: Study-Level Files DS1: 1996 Clinical Judgements Survey DS2: 1997 Dangerousness Survey DS3: 1998 Survey
description: All members of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law (AAPL).
description: self-enumerated questionnaire
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr34830.v1
title: Ghana Population, Consumption and Environment (PCE) Survey, 2002
title: Version 1

description: The Ghana Population, Consumption, and Environment Survey (or Ghana-PCE Survey) was conducted in 2002 in collaboration with investigators at the University of Science and Technology (Kumasi) and the University of Cape Coast. The survey was designed to examine the social and demographic processes that are closely linked to health and environmental health risks, and how these in turn influence local thinking about environmental issues. The 2002 Ghana-PCE Survey collected information on women's birth histories (birth dataset), occupations and events over the respondent's lifetime (men's and women's calendar datasets), and the health of respondents' children who were at or under 6 years of age (children dataset). Additionally, information was collected on the availability of services such as electricity and drinking water, economic conditions, and perceived necessity of developmental programs (community dataset), as well as the availability of services such as waste disposal, the size of households, and the materials used in construction of houses (household dataset). Respondents' were also asked about voting behavior, community organization membership, public health practices, knowledge of illnesses in children, prevention and treatment of diseases, family planning, and environmental attitudes and awareness (individual dataset). Demographic information collected includes age, sex, occupation, birth region, languages spoken, ethnicity, marital status, residence ownership, religion, and education.
description: The purpose of this data collection is to examine interrelationships among health, environment, and development.
description: The data are not weighted, however, this collection contains several weight variables which users should apply during analysis: MPCEWGT (Men's weight), WPCEWGT (Women's weight), ALLPCEWGT (Men's and Women's weight for combined analysis), and HHPCEWGT (Household weight). All child level analysis should use the women's weights.
description: Response Rates: 92 percent of households.
description: The 2002 Survey incorporated a two-stage stratified, clustered sampling design. Fifty-four primary sampling units called Enumeration Areas (EA) in Ghana were sampled in the first stage and were stratified by rural, semi-urban, and urban areas. Three EAs were selected from each of the three strata in each of the six districts (3*3*6=54). A census was conducted of the 54 EAs and 24 households were randomly sampled within each EA for the survey.
description: Datasets: DS0: Study-Level Files DS1: Birth DS2: Men's calendar DS3: Women's calendar DS4: Children DS5: Community DS6: Household DS7: Individual
description: Non-institutionalized residents of the Central Region of Ghana aged 15 years and older. Smallest Geographic Unit: Enumeration Area
description: face-to-face interview; self-enumerated questionnaire; on-site questionnaire
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr34830
title: Ghana Population, Consumption and Environment (PCE) Survey, 2002
title: Archival Version

description: The Ghana Population, Consumption, and Environment Survey (or Ghana-PCE Survey) was conducted in 2002 in collaboration with investigators at the University of Science and Technology (Kumasi) and the University of Cape Coast. The survey was designed to examine the social and demographic processes that are closely linked to health and environmental health risks, and how these in turn influence local thinking about environmental issues. The 2002 Ghana-PCE Survey collected information on women's birth histories (birth dataset), occupations and events over the respondent's lifetime (men's and women's calendar datasets), and the health of respondents' children who were at or under 6 years of age (children dataset). Additionally, information was collected on the availability of services such as electricity and drinking water, economic conditions, and perceived necessity of developmental programs (community dataset), as well as the availability of services such as waste disposal, the size of households, and the materials used in construction of houses (household dataset). Respondents' were also asked about voting behavior, community organization membership, public health practices, knowledge of illnesses in children, prevention and treatment of diseases, family planning, and environmental attitudes and awareness (individual dataset). Demographic information collected includes age, sex, occupation, birth region, languages spoken, ethnicity, marital status, residence ownership, religion, and education.
description: The purpose of this data collection is to examine interrelationships among health, environment, and development.
description: The data are not weighted, however, this collection contains several weight variables which users should apply during analysis: MPCEWGT (Men's weight), WPCEWGT (Women's weight), ALLPCEWGT (Men's and Women's weight for combined analysis), and HHPCEWGT (Household weight). All child level analysis should use the women's weights.
description: Response Rates: 92 percent of households.
description: The 2002 Survey incorporated a two-stage stratified, clustered sampling design. Fifty-four primary sampling units called Enumeration Areas (EA) in Ghana were sampled in the first stage and were stratified by rural, semi-urban, and urban areas. Three EAs were selected from each of the three strata in each of the six districts (3*3*6=54). A census was conducted of the 54 EAs and 24 households were randomly sampled within each EA for the survey.
description: Datasets: DS0: Study-Level Files DS1: Birth DS2: Men's calendar DS3: Women's calendar DS4: Children DS5: Community DS6: Household DS7: Individual
description: Non-institutionalized residents of the Central Region of Ghana aged 15 years and older. Smallest Geographic Unit: Enumeration Area
description: face-to-face interview; self-enumerated questionnaire; on-site questionnaire
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19640034
title: Processed datasets

description: Processed protein and phosphopeptides quantitation datasets in three tissues from Collaborative Cross mice population.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19640034.v1
title: Processed datasets

description: Processed protein and phosphopeptides quantitation datasets in three tissues from Collaborative Cross mice population.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr34890.v1
title: States as Employers-of-Choice Survey, 2008-2009
title: Version 1

description: The States as Employer-of-Choice was designed to examine the shifting age demographics of the workforces in state governments and help state agencies respond to the changing multigenerational workforce, with data collected from 222 state agencies in 27 states. Two surveys were conducted at two time periods: (1) before the resources and technical assistance were offered to the administrators of state agencies in 2008 (Time 1), and (2) after the completion of the technical assistance program in 2009 (Time 2). The surveys queried respondents about descriptive information on their workplace, the current workforce of the agency, factors outside of the agency that might affect workforce strategy, the perceived culture of the agency, and policies and benefits programs available to employees. Information was gathered from Human Resources managers in public sector state agencies to gauge their understanding of the following: (a) changes in the age demographics of their workforces, (b) steps they have taken to assess how these changes might impact their agencies, and (c) employer-sponsored resources (policies, programs, and benefits) that might help them to recruit, engage, and retain a multi-generational workforce, including older workers. As part of the Time 2 survey, questions on agency response to the economic downturn and assessments of the intervention were included. Demographic information includes the agency's budget, number of employees, average salary, percent of full and part-time workers. The respondent's background information includes their current position in the agency and the number of years with the agency.
description: The survey was implemented in two time periods: (1) The 2008 Time 1 survey collected data from a total of 222 agencies in 27 states, and (2) The 2009 Time 2 survey collected data on 108 agencies in the same 27 states. Please refer to the Original P.I. Documentation in the ICPSR Codebook for more information on study design.
description: Response Rates: (1) 14.3 percent (2) 27.0 percent. Please refer to the Original P.I. Documentation in the ICPSR Codebook for addtional information on response rates.
description: Using the web sites of the 50 state governments, 20 state agencies that had counterparts in other states were identified (e.g. Department of Children and Family Services, Department of Revenue, and Department of Corrections). Each agency needed to have at least 50 employees. Please refer to the Original P. I. Documentation in the ICPSR Codebook for information on sampling.
description: Datasets: DS1: States as Employers-of-Choice Survey, 2008-2009
description: State agencies in the United States with web sites. Smallest Geographic Unit: State
description: computer-assisted self interview (CASI)Please refer to the Sloan Center On Aging and Work Web site for more information on the States as Employers-of-Choice Survey study.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr34890
title: States as Employers-of-Choice Survey, 2008-2009
title: Archival Version

description: The States as Employer-of-Choice was designed to examine the shifting age demographics of the workforces in state governments and help state agencies respond to the changing multigenerational workforce, with data collected from 222 state agencies in 27 states. Two surveys were conducted at two time periods: (1) before the resources and technical assistance were offered to the administrators of state agencies in 2008 (Time 1), and (2) after the completion of the technical assistance program in 2009 (Time 2). The surveys queried respondents about descriptive information on their workplace, the current workforce of the agency, factors outside of the agency that might affect workforce strategy, the perceived culture of the agency, and policies and benefits programs available to employees. Information was gathered from Human Resources managers in public sector state agencies to gauge their understanding of the following: (a) changes in the age demographics of their workforces, (b) steps they have taken to assess how these changes might impact their agencies, and (c) employer-sponsored resources (policies, programs, and benefits) that might help them to recruit, engage, and retain a multi-generational workforce, including older workers. As part of the Time 2 survey, questions on agency response to the economic downturn and assessments of the intervention were included. Demographic information includes the agency's budget, number of employees, average salary, percent of full and part-time workers. The respondent's background information includes their current position in the agency and the number of years with the agency.
description: The survey was implemented in two time periods: (1) The 2008 Time 1 survey collected data from a total of 222 agencies in 27 states, and (2) The 2009 Time 2 survey collected data on 108 agencies in the same 27 states. Please refer to the Original P.I. Documentation in the ICPSR Codebook for more information on study design.
description: Response Rates: (1) 14.3 percent (2) 27.0 percent. Please refer to the Original P.I. Documentation in the ICPSR Codebook for addtional information on response rates.
description: Using the web sites of the 50 state governments, 20 state agencies that had counterparts in other states were identified (e.g. Department of Children and Family Services, Department of Revenue, and Department of Corrections). Each agency needed to have at least 50 employees. Please refer to the Original P. I. Documentation in the ICPSR Codebook for information on sampling.
description: Datasets: DS1: States as Employers-of-Choice Survey, 2008-2009
description: State agencies in the United States with web sites. Smallest Geographic Unit: State
description: computer-assisted self interview (CASI)Please refer to the Sloan Center On Aging and Work Web site for more information on the States as Employers-of-Choice Survey study.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr34895.v1
title: Congressional Candidate Websites
title: Version 1

description: The Congressional Candidate Websites study uses congressional candidate Web site data from 2002 to 2006 to understand campaign behavior. The content analysis data includes information on major party House and Senate candidates, their districts/states, and aspects of their campaign Web sites including their use of technology and political variables such as endorsements, issue positions, image promotion, and negative commentary.
description: The entire universe of major party Senate candidates; a random sample, stratified by state, for House candidates.
description: Datasets: DS1: Congressional Candidate Websites
description: United States House and Senate Candidates 2002 to 2006. Smallest Geographic Unit: Congressional District
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6480218
title: Combining Policies to Reduce the Spread of Viral Misinformation Online

description: Data were collected as part of the Election Integrity Partnership. Instances of potential misinformation were flagged as tickets. These were reviewed and categorized as misinformation if they made false claims related to election integrity. Details on the collection methods of the EIP can be found in our Report. These tickets were grouped together into qualitatively similar incidents. For example, tickets regarding false narratives about the use of Benford's law to detect fraud in Wisconsin became an incident. For each incident, search terms and appropriate data-ranges were determined to query our database. Our full database consisted of all tweets matching an evolving set of keywords, collected in real time, using the Twitter API. To maintain user privacy, we are providing data segmented into events and aggregated into 5-minute blocks of time. This should be sufficient for replicating our findings (predicated on the aggregation and segmentation). In order to permit analysis under various user-removal conditions, we have provided multiple versions of this dataset with users removed according to the conditions evaluated in the manuscript. We encourage anyone with the need for more granular data or alternate conditions to reach out to the University of Washington Center for an Informed Public.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6480217
title: Combining Policies to Reduce the Spread of Viral Misinformation Online

description: Data were collected as part of the Election Integrity Partnership. Instances of potential misinformation were flagged as tickets. These were reviewed and categorized as misinformation if they made false claims related to election integrity. Details on the collection methods of the EIP can be found in our Report. These tickets were grouped together into qualitatively similar incidents. For example, tickets regarding false narratives about the use of Benford's law to detect fraud in Wisconsin became an incident. For each incident, search terms and appropriate data-ranges were determined to query our database. Our full database consisted of all tweets matching an evolving set of keywords, collected in real time, using the Twitter API. To maintain user privacy, we are providing data segmented into events and aggregated into 5-minute blocks of time. This should be sufficient for replicating our findings (predicated on the aggregation and segmentation). In order to permit analysis under various user-removal conditions, we have provided multiple versions of this dataset with users removed according to the conditions evaluated in the manuscript. We encourage anyone with the need for more granular data or alternate conditions to reach out to the University of Washington Center for an Informed Public.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6479103
title: Dataset for "Bioaerosol diversity and Ice nucleating particles in the North-Western Himalayan Region"

description: Dataset for "Bioaerosol diversity and Ice nucleating particles in the North-Western Himalayan Region". Contains data and scripts to reproduce the figures in the manuscript. See README.md for more information.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6479102
title: Dataset for "Bioaerosol diversity and Ice nucleating particles in the North-Western Himalayan Region"

description: Dataset for "Bioaerosol diversity and Ice nucleating particles in the North-Western Himalayan Region". Contains data and scripts to reproduce the figures in the manuscript. See README.md for more information.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr35018.v1
title: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race, Summarized Yearly, United States, 2012
title: Version 1

description: These data provide information on the number of arrests reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program each year by police agencies in the United States. These arrest reports provide data on 43 offenses including violent crime, drug use, gambling, and larceny. The data received by ICPSR were structured as a hierarchical file containing, per reporting police agency: an agency header record, and 1 to 43 detail offense records containing the counts of arrests by age, sex, and race for a particular offense. ICPSR restructured the original data to logical record length format with the agency header record variables copied onto the detail records. Consequently, each record contains arrest counts for a particular agency-offense.
description: Datasets: DS1: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race, Summarized Yearly, United States, 2012
description: Arrests reported by law enforcement agencies to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reporting program. Smallest Geographic Unit: states, counties, cities
description: computer-assisted self interview (CASI); on-site questionnaire
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr35034.v1
title: Generations of Talent Study
title: Version 1

description: The Generations of Talent Study sought to examine several dimensions of quality of employment as experienced by today's multigenerational workforces. The primary goal was to explore how country-related factors and age-related factors affect employees' perceptions of quality of employment. Information was gathered from employees working in 11 different countries including the United States, United Kingdom, China, India, Spain, Brazil, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa, and Botswana. The industry sectors included technology, pharmaceuticals, consulting, energy, and finance. Demographic variables included gender, birth year, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, number of children, hourly wage, salary, and household income.
description: No weight variables were provided.
description: Response Rates: 14.6 percent
description: Presence of Common Scales: Most measures included were adapted and/or abridged due to space constraints; such as Hofstede's (2001) attitude survey measures; Karasek's (1985) job characteristics measures; Mor Barak and Cherin's (1998) inclusion measures; and Mowday, Steers, & Porter's (1979) organizational commitment measure.
description: Each employer chose the sites that it wanted to participate in the survey, as described in the documentation. Almost all sites used either a random sample or a population sample. There were two exceptions: Pharma2 Brazil (as identified in the dataset) excluded manufacturing employees from their sample, while Pharrma2 Spain preidentified 60 percent of sales and remote workers and 40 percent of office employees for inclusion in the survey.
description: Datasets: DS1: Generations of Talent Study
description: Employees in large multinational corporations. Smallest Geographic Unit: country
description: computer-assisted self interview (CASI)Data producers did not include weight variables because the variables needed to create weights could be used to identify the sites, and because of the limited value of these weights to most analyses (which would weight the dataset to the site demographics, rather than country demographics).