cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.17188/1188343
title: Materials Data on LiYGa4 by Materials Project

description: LiYGa4 crystallizes in the hexagonal P-6m2 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Li is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to twelve Ga atoms. There are six shorter (2.84 Å) and six longer (3.16 Å) Li–Ga bond lengths. Y is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to twelve Ga atoms. There are six shorter (2.95 Å) and six longer (3.30 Å) Y–Ga bond lengths. There are two inequivalent Ga sites. In the first Ga site, Ga is bonded in a 10-coordinate geometry to three equivalent Li, three equivalent Y, and four Ga atoms. There are three shorter (2.58 Å) and one longer (2.64 Å) Ga–Ga bond lengths. In the second Ga site, Ga is bonded in a 10-coordinate geometry to three equivalent Li, three equivalent Y, and four Ga atoms. The Ga–Ga bond length is 3.08 Å.
DOI: 10.17188/1188344
title: Materials Data on Tm5(SiSb)2 by Materials Project

description: Tm5Sb2Si2 crystallizes in the orthorhombic Cmce space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are two inequivalent Tm sites. In the first Tm site, Tm is bonded to three equivalent Si and three equivalent Sb atoms to form distorted TmSi3Sb3 pentagonal pyramids that share corners with three equivalent TmSi4Sb2 octahedra, corners with ten equivalent TmSi3Sb3 pentagonal pyramids, edges with seven equivalent TmSi3Sb3 pentagonal pyramids, faces with two equivalent TmSi4Sb2 octahedra, and faces with two equivalent TmSi3Sb3 pentagonal pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 36–41°. There are one shorter (2.89 Å) and two longer (2.98 Å) Tm–Si bond lengths. There are one shorter (3.11 Å) and two longer (3.14 Å) Tm–Sb bond lengths. In the second Tm site, Tm is bonded to four equivalent Si and two equivalent Sb atoms to form TmSi4Sb2 octahedra that share corners with four equivalent TmSi4Sb2 octahedra, corners with twelve equivalent TmSi3Sb3 pentagonal pyramids, and faces with eight equivalent TmSi3Sb3 pentagonal pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 50°. There are two shorter (3.02 Å) and two longer (3.03 Å) Tm–Si bond lengths. Both Tm–Sb bond lengths are 3.07 Å. Si is bonded in a 8-coordinate geometry to eight Tm atoms. Sb is bonded to seven Tm atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing SbTm7 pentagonal bipyramids.
DOI: 10.17188/1188345
title: Materials Data on SrS3 by Materials Project

description: SrS3 crystallizes in the orthorhombic Aea2 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Sr2+ is bonded in a 9-coordinate geometry to nine S+0.67- atoms. There are a spread of Sr–S bond distances ranging from 3.02–3.51 Å. There are two inequivalent S+0.67- sites. In the first S+0.67- site, S+0.67- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three equivalent Sr2+ and two equivalent S+0.67- atoms. Both S–S bond lengths are 2.09 Å. In the second S+0.67- site, S+0.67- is bonded to three equivalent Sr2+ and one S+0.67- atom to form a mixture of distorted corner and edge-sharing SSr3S trigonal pyramids.
DOI: 10.17188/1188346
title: Materials Data on Ti6Si2B by Materials Project

description: Ti6Si2B crystallizes in the hexagonal P-62m space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are two inequivalent Ti sites. In the first Ti site, Ti is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to two equivalent B and two equivalent Si atoms. Both Ti–B bond lengths are 2.32 Å. Both Ti–Si bond lengths are 2.64 Å. In the second Ti site, Ti is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to one B and four equivalent Si atoms. The Ti–B bond length is 2.71 Å. All Ti–Si bond lengths are 2.66 Å. B is bonded in a 9-coordinate geometry to nine Ti atoms. Si is bonded in a 9-coordinate geometry to nine Ti atoms.
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc25z0qx
title: CCDC 2024849: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Meng-qiu Song, Wei Min, Jing Wang, Xi-Xi Si, Xiu-Jun Wang, Yu-Wei Liu, Da-Hua Shi|2021|J.Mol.Struct.|1229|129784|doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.129784
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc25dcwv
title: CCDC 2007897: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Changhyeon Seo, Yeon-Joo Cheong, Woojin Yoon, Jaegyeom Kim, Jinho Shin, Hoseop Yun, Seung-Joo Kim, Hye-Young Jang|2020|Organometallics|40|16|doi:10.1021/acs.organomet.0c00457
DOI: 10.17188/1188347
title: Materials Data on Lu7(NiTe)2 by Materials Project

description: Lu7(NiTe)2 crystallizes in the orthorhombic Imm2 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are four inequivalent Lu sites. In the first Lu site, Lu is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to three equivalent Ni and one Te atom. There are two shorter (2.74 Å) and one longer (3.12 Å) Lu–Ni bond lengths. The Lu–Te bond length is 3.13 Å. In the second Lu site, Lu is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Te atoms. There are two shorter (3.15 Å) and one longer (3.19 Å) Lu–Te bond lengths. In the third Lu site, Lu is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Ni and three Te atoms. Both Lu–Ni bond lengths are 2.73 Å. There are one shorter (3.07 Å) and two longer (3.14 Å) Lu–Te bond lengths. In the fourth Lu site, Lu is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to two equivalent Ni and two equivalent Te atoms. Both Lu–Ni bond lengths are 2.76 Å. Both Lu–Te bond lengths are 3.11 Å. Ni is bonded in a 7-coordinate geometry to seven Lu atoms. There are two inequivalent Te sites. In the first Te site, Te is bonded in a 7-coordinate geometry to seven Lu atoms. In the second Te site, Te is bonded in a 8-coordinate geometry to eight Lu atoms.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3731675
title: IODP Expedition 362 Section summary

description: Report includes data for individual core sections: coring/drilling depths and recovery, database identifiers for the whole section and section halves, and number of samples taken from the section before and after splitting.
DOI: 10.17188/1188348
title: Materials Data on Lu7(TePd)2 by Materials Project

description: Lu7(PdTe)2 crystallizes in the orthorhombic Imm2 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are four inequivalent Lu sites. In the first Lu site, Lu is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to three equivalent Pd and one Te atom. There are two shorter (2.81 Å) and one longer (3.15 Å) Lu–Pd bond lengths. The Lu–Te bond length is 3.11 Å. In the second Lu site, Lu is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to three Te atoms. There are two shorter (3.20 Å) and one longer (3.23 Å) Lu–Te bond lengths. In the third Lu site, Lu is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Pd and three Te atoms. Both Lu–Pd bond lengths are 2.82 Å. There are one shorter (3.07 Å) and two longer (3.14 Å) Lu–Te bond lengths. In the fourth Lu site, Lu is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Pd and two equivalent Te atoms. Both Lu–Pd bond lengths are 2.87 Å. Both Lu–Te bond lengths are 3.12 Å. Pd is bonded in a 7-coordinate geometry to seven Lu atoms. There are two inequivalent Te sites. In the first Te site, Te is bonded in a 7-coordinate geometry to seven Lu atoms. In the second Te site, Te is bonded in a 8-coordinate geometry to eight Lu atoms.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3731674
title: IODP Expedition 362 Section summary

description: Report includes data for individual core sections: coring/drilling depths and recovery, database identifiers for the whole section and section halves, and number of samples taken from the section before and after splitting.
DOI: 10.17188/1188349
title: Materials Data on Sc6Te2Os by Materials Project

description: Sc6OsTe2 crystallizes in the hexagonal P-62m space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are two inequivalent Sc sites. In the first Sc site, Sc is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Os and two equivalent Te atoms. Both Sc–Os bond lengths are 2.68 Å. Both Sc–Te bond lengths are 3.01 Å. In the second Sc site, Sc is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to one Os and four equivalent Te atoms. The Sc–Os bond length is 2.97 Å. All Sc–Te bond lengths are 3.10 Å. Os is bonded in a 9-coordinate geometry to nine Sc atoms. Te is bonded in a 9-coordinate geometry to nine Sc atoms.
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc26b40q
title: CCDC 2035522: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Daniela R. Araujo, Helen A. Goulart, Angelita M. Barcellos, Roberta Cargnelutti, Eder J. Lenardão, Gelson Perin|2020|J.Org.Chem.|86|1721|doi:10.1021/acs.joc.0c02525
DOI: 10.17188/1188350
title: Materials Data on Lu6Sb2Mo by Materials Project

description: Lu6MoSb2 crystallizes in the hexagonal P-62m space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are two inequivalent Lu sites. In the first Lu site, Lu is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to one Mo and four equivalent Sb atoms. The Lu–Mo bond length is 3.12 Å. All Lu–Sb bond lengths are 3.27 Å. In the second Lu site, Lu is bonded to two equivalent Mo and two equivalent Sb atoms to form a mixture of distorted corner and edge-sharing LuSb2Mo2 tetrahedra. Both Lu–Mo bond lengths are 2.88 Å. Both Lu–Sb bond lengths are 3.11 Å. Mo is bonded in a 9-coordinate geometry to nine Lu atoms. Sb is bonded in a 9-coordinate geometry to nine Lu atoms.
DOI: 10.17188/1188351
title: Materials Data on TbTe by Materials Project

description: TbTe is Halite, Rock Salt structured and crystallizes in the cubic Fm-3m space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Tb is bonded to six equivalent Te atoms to form a mixture of edge and corner-sharing TbTe6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 0°. All Tb–Te bond lengths are 3.09 Å. Te is bonded to six equivalent Tb atoms to form a mixture of edge and corner-sharing TeTb6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 0°.
DOI: 10.17188/1188352
title: Materials Data on ErCd2Cu by Materials Project

description: ErCuCd2 is Bergman Structure: Mg32(Al,Zn)49 Bergman-like structured and crystallizes in the orthorhombic Cmcm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Er is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to four equivalent Cu and eight equivalent Cd atoms. There are two shorter (2.99 Å) and two longer (3.50 Å) Er–Cu bond lengths. There are a spread of Er–Cd bond distances ranging from 3.11–3.21 Å. Cu is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to four equivalent Er and eight equivalent Cd atoms. There are a spread of Cu–Cd bond distances ranging from 2.87–3.24 Å. Cd is bonded in a 11-coordinate geometry to four equivalent Er, four equivalent Cu, and three equivalent Cd atoms. There are one shorter (2.90 Å) and two longer (3.06 Å) Cd–Cd bond lengths.
DOI: 10.17188/1188353
title: Materials Data on HoSnPd by Materials Project

description: HoPdSn crystallizes in the orthorhombic Pnma space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Ho is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to six equivalent Pd and six equivalent Sn atoms. There are a spread of Ho–Pd bond distances ranging from 3.10–3.39 Å. There are a spread of Ho–Sn bond distances ranging from 3.20–3.33 Å. Pd is bonded in a 10-coordinate geometry to six equivalent Ho and four equivalent Sn atoms. There are a spread of Pd–Sn bond distances ranging from 2.69–2.89 Å. Sn is bonded in a 10-coordinate geometry to six equivalent Ho and four equivalent Pd atoms.
DOI: 10.17188/1188354
title: Materials Data on Ti5Se4 by Materials Project

description: Ti5Se4 is Titanium telluride structured and crystallizes in the tetragonal I4/m space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are two inequivalent Ti sites. In the first Ti site, Ti is bonded in a square co-planar geometry to four equivalent Se atoms. All Ti–Se bond lengths are 2.71 Å. In the second Ti site, Ti is bonded to five equivalent Se atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing TiSe5 square pyramids. There are a spread of Ti–Se bond distances ranging from 2.60–2.63 Å. Se is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to six Ti atoms.
DOI: 10.17188/1188355
title: Materials Data on CoCu2SiS4 by Materials Project

description: Cu2CoSiS4 is Stannite structured and crystallizes in the tetragonal I-42m space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Co2+ is bonded to four equivalent S2- atoms to form CoS4 tetrahedra that share corners with four equivalent SiS4 tetrahedra and corners with eight equivalent CuS4 tetrahedra. All Co–S bond lengths are 2.29 Å. Cu1+ is bonded to four equivalent S2- atoms to form CuS4 tetrahedra that share corners with four equivalent CoS4 tetrahedra, corners with four equivalent CuS4 tetrahedra, and corners with four equivalent SiS4 tetrahedra. All Cu–S bond lengths are 2.29 Å. Si4+ is bonded to four equivalent S2- atoms to form SiS4 tetrahedra that share corners with four equivalent CoS4 tetrahedra and corners with eight equivalent CuS4 tetrahedra. All Si–S bond lengths are 2.18 Å. S2- is bonded to one Co2+, two equivalent Cu1+, and one Si4+ atom to form corner-sharing SCoCu2Si tetrahedra.
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc26nfkw
title: CCDC 2045428: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Wangcheng Hu, Xinwei He, Tongtong Zhou, Youpeng Zuo, Shiwen Zhang, Tingting Yang, Yongjia Shang|2021|Org.Biomol.Chem.|19|552|doi:10.1039/D0OB02310H
DOI: 10.17188/1188356
title: Materials Data on CoCu2SnS4 by Materials Project

description: Cu2CoSnS4 is Stannite structured and crystallizes in the tetragonal I-42m space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Co2+ is bonded to four equivalent S2- atoms to form CoS4 tetrahedra that share corners with four equivalent SnS4 tetrahedra and corners with eight equivalent CuS4 tetrahedra. All Co–S bond lengths are 2.26 Å. Cu1+ is bonded to four equivalent S2- atoms to form CuS4 tetrahedra that share corners with four equivalent CoS4 tetrahedra, corners with four equivalent CuS4 tetrahedra, and corners with four equivalent SnS4 tetrahedra. All Cu–S bond lengths are 2.30 Å. Sn4+ is bonded to four equivalent S2- atoms to form SnS4 tetrahedra that share corners with four equivalent CoS4 tetrahedra and corners with eight equivalent CuS4 tetrahedra. All Sn–S bond lengths are 2.49 Å. S2- is bonded to one Co2+, two equivalent Cu1+, and one Sn4+ atom to form corner-sharing SCoCu2Sn tetrahedra.
DOI: 10.17188/1188357
title: Materials Data on CoCu2SnSe4 by Materials Project

description: Cu2CoSnSe4 is Stannite structured and crystallizes in the tetragonal I-42m space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Co2+ is bonded to four equivalent Se2- atoms to form CoSe4 tetrahedra that share corners with four equivalent SnSe4 tetrahedra and corners with eight equivalent CuSe4 tetrahedra. All Co–Se bond lengths are 2.37 Å. Cu1+ is bonded to four equivalent Se2- atoms to form CuSe4 tetrahedra that share corners with four equivalent CoSe4 tetrahedra, corners with four equivalent CuSe4 tetrahedra, and corners with four equivalent SnSe4 tetrahedra. All Cu–Se bond lengths are 2.42 Å. Sn4+ is bonded to four equivalent Se2- atoms to form SnSe4 tetrahedra that share corners with four equivalent CoSe4 tetrahedra and corners with eight equivalent CuSe4 tetrahedra. All Sn–Se bond lengths are 2.65 Å. Se2- is bonded to one Co2+, two equivalent Cu1+, and one Sn4+ atom to form corner-sharing SeCoCu2Sn tetrahedra.
DOI: 10.17188/1188358
title: Materials Data on Ba3Ti3(BO6)2 by Materials Project

description: Ba3Ti3O6(BO3)2 crystallizes in the hexagonal P-62m space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Ba2+ is bonded in a 2-coordinate geometry to thirteen O2- atoms. There are a spread of Ba–O bond distances ranging from 2.74–3.18 Å. Ti4+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form corner-sharing TiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 15–37°. There are a spread of Ti–O bond distances ranging from 1.90–2.13 Å. B3+ is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to three equivalent O2- atoms. All B–O bond lengths are 1.38 Å. There are three inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to four equivalent Ba2+, one Ti4+, and one B3+ atom. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted linear geometry to three equivalent Ba2+ and two equivalent Ti4+ atoms. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 2-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Ba2+ and two equivalent Ti4+ atoms.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10012856
title: Model Counting Competition 2021: Competition Instances

description: Instances for the Model Counting Competition 2021

- Track 1 (Model Counting)- Track 2 (Weighted Model Counting)- Track 3 (Projected Model Counting)- Track 4 (Model Counting)

The even instances (trackX_000.cnf, trackX_002.cnf, ...) were made public for all participants during the testing phase of the solvers, whereas the private instances (trackX_001.cnf, trackX_003.cnf, ...) were used for the final evaluation and disclosed after the submission.  

For details, we refer to: https://mccompetition.org/past_iterations.

Instances originate from various publicly available data sets and submissions made after a call for benchmarks. The full instances from which we selected is available on Zenodo under - Model Counting Competition 2021: Full Instance Set

Details will be made public in the upcoming report.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10012857
title: Model Counting Competition 2021: Competition Instances

description: Instances for the Model Counting Competition 2021

- Track 1 (Model Counting)- Track 2 (Weighted Model Counting)- Track 3 (Projected Model Counting)- Track 4 (Model Counting)

The even instances (trackX_000.cnf, trackX_002.cnf, ...) were made public for all participants during the testing phase of the solvers, whereas the private instances (trackX_001.cnf, trackX_003.cnf, ...) were used for the final evaluation and disclosed after the submission.  

For details, we refer to: https://mccompetition.org/past_iterations.

Instances originate from various publicly available data sets and submissions made after a call for benchmarks. The full instances from which we selected is available on Zenodo under - Model Counting Competition 2021: Full Instance Set

Details will be made public in the upcoming report.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.14433395
title: Additional file 2 of Four myriapod relatives – but who are sisters? No end to debates on relationships among the four major myriapod subgroups

description: Additional file 2: Table S1. Taxon sampling and accession numbers of raw and assembled transcriptome data of species included in this study. Table S2. Collection information. Table S3. Assembly statistics of published transcriptome data de novo assembled. Table S4. Contamination and assembly statistics of de novo assembled transcriptome data newly sequenced for this study. Table S5. Information and source of the reference species included in the ortholog set. Table S6. Orthograph statistics. Table S7. Group definitions to compile the data sets RELAXEDaa and RELAXEDnt (2nd codon positions). Table S8. Supermatrix diagnostics of final data sets compared with those analysed by Fernandez et al., 2018. Table S9. Overview of statistical bootstrap and transfer bootstrap support of selected clades. Table S10. Group definitions used for Four-cluster Likelihood Mapping (FcLM) analyses. Table S11. FcLM results testing the position of Myriapoda within Euarthropoda (Mandibulata versus Paradoxopoda). Table S12. Outgroup dependence: FcLM results testing myriapod relationships with Chelicerata and Onychophora as outgroup (data set STRICTaa_ChO). Table S13. Outgroup dependence: FcLM results testing myriapod relationships with Pancrustacea as outgroup (data set STRICTaa_Pan). Table S14. Amino acid and nucleotide frequencies of included species in data sets STRICTaa and STRICTnt.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.14433395.v1
title: Additional file 2 of Four myriapod relatives – but who are sisters? No end to debates on relationships among the four major myriapod subgroups

description: Additional file 2: Table S1. Taxon sampling and accession numbers of raw and assembled transcriptome data of species included in this study. Table S2. Collection information. Table S3. Assembly statistics of published transcriptome data de novo assembled. Table S4. Contamination and assembly statistics of de novo assembled transcriptome data newly sequenced for this study. Table S5. Information and source of the reference species included in the ortholog set. Table S6. Orthograph statistics. Table S7. Group definitions to compile the data sets RELAXEDaa and RELAXEDnt (2nd codon positions). Table S8. Supermatrix diagnostics of final data sets compared with those analysed by Fernandez et al., 2018. Table S9. Overview of statistical bootstrap and transfer bootstrap support of selected clades. Table S10. Group definitions used for Four-cluster Likelihood Mapping (FcLM) analyses. Table S11. FcLM results testing the position of Myriapoda within Euarthropoda (Mandibulata versus Paradoxopoda). Table S12. Outgroup dependence: FcLM results testing myriapod relationships with Chelicerata and Onychophora as outgroup (data set STRICTaa_ChO). Table S13. Outgroup dependence: FcLM results testing myriapod relationships with Pancrustacea as outgroup (data set STRICTaa_Pan). Table S14. Amino acid and nucleotide frequencies of included species in data sets STRICTaa and STRICTnt.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.14433542
title: Additional file of A comprehensive RNA handling and transcriptomics guide for high-throughput processing of Plasmodium blood-stage samples

description: Additional file of A comprehensive RNA handling and transcriptomics guide for high-throughput processing of Plasmodium blood-stage samples
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.14433542.v1
title: Additional file of A comprehensive RNA handling and transcriptomics guide for high-throughput processing of Plasmodium blood-stage samples

description: Additional file of A comprehensive RNA handling and transcriptomics guide for high-throughput processing of Plasmodium blood-stage samples
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.8142185
title: Classification of identified splicing factors in splicing.

description: Classifications of identified key SFs.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.8142185.v1
title: Classification of identified splicing factors in splicing.

description: Classifications of identified key SFs.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.22297985
title: Advance intervention of recessive ill-conditioned feature: the early-stage design method based on system recessive inheritance

description: In the fusion design process of the system, ill-conditioned features, that are not explicit in previous generation systems, may exhibit to negate the operation of the new-generation system. This type of ill-conditioned feature is termed as the recessive ill-conditioned feature (R-ICF) of the system. It is believed that R-ICF in the fusion design process is attributed to the complex system recessive inheritance mechanism (C-RIM), which is analogical to organism recessive inheritance. In-depth study of the characteristics of C-RIM, it is found that one of the reasons leading to R-ICF is the recessive couplings between parameters of the previous generation of systems. This article proposes screening methods for recessive couplings and preliminary methods to intervene R-ICF. An auxiliary software is developed to facilitate implementation of the currently proposed methods. In order to reduce the number of design iterations due to R-ICF, thus to improve efficiency for the fusion innovation process, this article further proposes a system fusion innovation design process model based on C-RIM. Through this process model, R-ICF incurred by recessive couplings can be detected and resolved in advance at the early-stage of product design. The applicability of the currently proposed process model is demonstrated by design exemplification with an irregular workpiece transport system. <b>Abbreviation:</b> A, Act; C-RIM, complex system recessive inheritance mechanism; Ai,i=1,2,3… Act; DCC, design-centric complexity; EO, Execution object; EOi,i=1,2,3… Execution object; Fi,i=1,2,3… Function; N, Noun; PSS, Product service systems; R-ICF, Recessive ill-conditioned feature; TRIZ, theory of inventive problem solving; R-ICF-n-m R-ICF with <i>n</i>(<i>n</i> ≥ 3) affected function incurred by parameters from <i>m</i> (<i>m</i> ≥ 3) source systems; T, Target; Ti,i=1,2,3… Target; V, Verb