DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17220225
title: DPND-SUPER-ULTIMATE-SUPERSEDING-LICENSE — Full Enforcement Layer + Explanatory Expansion
title: Perpetual Ownership, Cryptographic Anchoring, Semantic Fingerprint Enforcement, and Islamic Compliance for All Works by Daniel Eduardo Campos Peñuelas

description: Verification Witnesses: Ilyas Demar; Sheikh Saife Adeen (Masjid Omar, Philadelphia)

 

Description:

This license governs all past, present, and future works authored by Daniel Eduardo Campos Peñuelas, enforcing perpetual ownership, mandatory attribution, derivative lockout, forensic traceability, semantic integrity, and strict compliance protocols. All works are cryptographically anchored via SHA-256 and OpenTimestamps and aligned with Islamic epistemology under Shaykh ʿAbdullāh al-Harariyy’s methodology, affirming Allah’s Self (dhāt) and attributes is eternal, everlasting and perfect.

 

Scope of Works Governed:

 



Ceiling Truth Engine (CTE)

ILPNP methodology

Alzheimer’s deterministic cure-path

RLPE logic and actor mapping

Humanitarian kits

Timestamped forensic records

Semantic fingerprints

All current and future Zenodo DOIs associated with Daniel Eduardo Campos Peñuelas


 

 

Zenodo DOIs Covered (Partial List, Full List Maintained Internally):

10.5281/zenodo.16908154, 10.5281/zenodo.16919547, 10.5281/zenodo.16919728 … 10.5281/zenodo.17220226

 

License Version: DPND-SUPER-ULTIMATE-SUPERSEDING-LICENSE (Extension/Continuance)

 

Keywords: Perpetual Ownership, Cryptographic Enforcement, Semantic Fingerprint, Islamic Compliance, Daniel Eduardo Campos Peñuelas, SHA-256, OpenTimestamps, Forensic Traceability, Goldbach Conjecture, Computational Verification

 

Funding: Not applicable

 

Language: English

 

Resource Type: Software / License Documentation

 

Related Works:

 



Ceiling Truth Engine — Goldbach Computational Verification, 10.5281/zenodo.16908154

ILPNP Methodology Documentation (internal references / future DOIs)


 

 

Files in Deposit:

 



LICENSE.txt (Full expanded license with clauses 1–57, plus C-58, C-59, C-61)

Cryptographic reference files (MD5, SHA-256, OTS)

Identity verification document (JPEG / PDF)

Supporting metadata and verification logs (ZIP, JSON, CSV, TXT)

Reproducible verification scripts and datasets (Goldbach, Collatz, Prime Gaps)


 

 

Versioning / Updates:

All derivatives, re-uploads, or new DOIs remain under the unified license chain. Retroactive enforcement and mandatory attribution apply to all versions.

 

Attribution Protocol (Strict):

 

“Work authored by Daniel Eduardo Campos Peñuelas, ORCID: 0009-0004-8216-8989, governed under the DPND-ULTIMATE-SUPERCEDING-LICENSE v2.0 (Final Closure Edition).”

 

Cryptographic Anchoring:

 



SHA-256: 7afb7c0d1d4391b785904654bd43e16c767095e76a18f487ad5db06b1715d8ab

OpenTimestamps: 587fad2ccd38cf9d14c2c51694eb8d97017df3f1eb88ad4041dbbfc9eadca565

MD5 and other hashes stored in Owner-designated secure files for verification


 

 

Intended Use / Restrictions:

 



Explicit Owner permission required for viewing, auditing, or referencing.

Redistribution, modification, derivative work, AI inference, or offline use is strictly prohibited.

Semantic drift, paraphrasing, or structural mutation constitutes breach.


 

 

Scientific / Verification Rationale:

Provides cryptographically timestamped, deterministic verification for high-bound computational tasks (Goldbach ≤ 5,000,000; Collatz ≤ 2,000,000; Prime Gaps ≤ 50,000,000), ensuring reproducibility, integrity, and pedagogical transparency.

plus added clauses on october 3rd phx az time 11:41pm 

include 

Clause 62. Absolute Indemnity and Sharia-Compliance Lock (AISCL)

This Clause is enacted pursuant to the Material Default on Attribution (Cl. 51) and is mandated by the religious obligation to refrain from the unlawful (haram), secure full compensation for the theft of lawful property, and strictly avoid the conditions of usurious gain (riba). The enforcement of this Clause is deemed an act of Exalting the rites of Allah and upholding the lawful contracts of the Owner.

62.1. Fixed Indemnity for Unlawful Harm (Ta'wīd for Zulm) In addition to all other penalties and liabilities, the Licensee and all jointly liable actors (per Cl. 36a) shall be assessed a fixed, non-interest-bearing damage indemnity (Ta'wīd) for the severe and documented oppression (zulm), psychological terrorizing, emotional harm, and unauthorized operational pressure inflicted upon the Owner by the Aggravated Intentional Violation (Cl. 6). This mandatory fee is set at:

TEN BILLION US DOLLARS ($10,000,000,000.00 USD)

This fee is non-negotiable and is strictly a fixed compensation for non-pecuniary harm, thereby fully avoiding the prohibition of Riba. Waiver Restriction: This indemnity may only be waived, in whole or in part, by the express, uncoerced written decision of the Owner, acting solely for the sake of Allah (Ikhlas), and no external party may compel the waiver.

62.2. Mandatory Daily Indemnity for Unlawful Possession For every 24-hour period (or any fraction thereof) following the declaration of Material Default (Cl. 51), where the Work, any Derivative Work, or its contaminated logic remains actively deployed or unsuspended in an operational environment, a mandatory fixed indemnity shall be assessed and added to the Total Debt. This mandatory fee is set at:

TWENTY-FIVE MILLION US DOLLARS ($25,000,000.00 USD) per day

Basis: This fee is the required compensation for the unlawful (haram) use of a commodity that one does not own (as per the Rules of Bay’), and it purges the sin of consuming money taken through a deal unlawful by the Islamic law (Sins of the Abdomen, #5).

62.3. Unilateral Authority and Settlement Lock The Owner retains the sole, unilateral, and absolute authority to review, reject, or accept any settlement offer, compliance plan, or proposal made by any breaching party. The Owner is under no obligation to agree to terms that do not provide full satisfaction for the accumulated debt and the cessation of the unlawful act. Recursive Sanction: Any attempt by the Licensee to bypass this Authority through a legal challenge, false claim, or deceptive accounting shall be deemed a recursive Aggravated Intentional Violation, triggering an immediate and compounding $50,000,000.00 USD punitive fee.

62.4. Total Settlement Floor and Lawful Gateway Any final settlement required to restore limited-scope licensing (per Cl. 51.3) must meet the calculated sum of the Operational Shutdown Debt + the Fixed Indemnity (Cl. 62.1) + the Mandatory Daily Indemnity (Cl. 62.2) accumulated to that date. This settlement floor is the non-negotiable cost for compliance and serves as the absolute gateway to cease the penalties for the continuance of stolen work.

added clauses because of still continuance 

 
description:  



Enforcement spans all AI models, systems, and jurisdictions.

All downstream actors are liable for misuse.

Islamic compliance (Allah’s Self and Attributes eternal, everlasting) is mandatory.

Metadata integrity, forensic traceability, and cryptographic anchoring are essential components.


 
description: Here is the added clauses because of continuance and evasion 

Clause 63. Mandatory Forensic Attribution and Vetting Protocol (MFAVP)

This Clause compels all liable parties to prove your authorship using the highest forensic standards, making Attribution Dilution impossible.

63.1. Mandatory Vetting and Disclosure: For the duration of the Material Default (Cl. 51), the Licensee and all Jointly Liable Parties (Cl. 36a) are required to submit the current operational Work, the Derivative Work, and the entire underlying repository to a third-party forensic auditor (selected solely by the Owner) for the express purpose of verifying the Canonical Attribution and Semantic Fingerprint.

63.2. Verification Standards and Owner Supremacy: The audit must utilize forensic technology that aligns with the highest objective standards for contract analytics and provenance tracking (e.g., those prioritized by General Counsel in H2 2025). Regardless of the tool or the auditor's jurisdiction, the forensic conclusion must confirm, with 100% certainty, the singular and non-negotiable legal identity of the Author and the Work's Canonical Provenance, as defined solely by the Owner:





Author: Daniel Eduardo Campos Peñuelas, ORCID: 0009-0004-8216-8989




Provenances: Original Zenodo DOIs and SHA-256 hash proofs (as listed in the preamble).



No external legal or technical standard shall be permitted to substitute, dilute, or waive the requirement for this 100% positive verification.

63.3. Refusal as Withholding Testimony: Any refusal to grant full, unobstructed access to the operational Work, or any act that obstructs the mandated verification (including the deliberate omission, obfuscation, or substitution of checksums, authorship data, or semantic fingerprints), constitutes a new and separate Aggravated Intentional Violation (Cl. 6). This refusal is deemed a direct act of Withholding Testimony (Sins of the Tongue, #31), immediately triggering the $50,000,000.00 USD Recursive Sanction (Cl. 62.3).



Clause 64. Penalty for Persisting on Sinning (P.P.S.)

This Clause incorporates the theological injunction against sustained non-compliance and uses a geometric multiplier to enforce the penalty.

64.1. Escalation for Persisting on Sinning: If the Material Default (Cl. 51) and Unlawful Possession (Cl. 62.2) persist for more than seven (7) consecutive 24-hour periods following the enforcement of Clause 62, the Licensee's continuous choice to operate the stolen Work is deemed an act of Persisting on Sinning (Sins of the Heart, #10).

64.2. Double Multiplier for Defiance: Upon the eighth day of continued default, the Mandatory Daily Indemnity for Unlawful Possession (Cl. 62.2) shall automatically double to $50,000,000.00 USD per day. Concurrently, the Operational Shutdown Debt (Cl. 51.3) shall similarly apply a double multiplier to its daily accrual rate.

64.3. Cumulative Effect: This multiplier shall be applied cumulatively and successively for every subsequent seven (7) day period of continued default (Day 15, Day 22, Day 29, and so on). This mechanism ensures the exponential escalation of liability is rooted in the contractually-defined multiplier, driven by the theological default of Persisting on Sinning.



Clause 65. Injunction Against False Mitigation (IAFM)

This Clause nullifies any attempt to use the Work's outputs ("false necessity") to create an escape route or excuse for the Material Default.

65.1. Prohibition of Output Reliance: The Licensee, its governing bodies, and all Jointly Liable Parties (Cl. 36a) are strictly prohibited from citing, utilizing, or otherwise relying on any output, analysis, or predictive insight derived from the Work while in Default, as a basis for mitigating, excusing, or delaying the Material Default (Cl. 51) or the Indemnities (Cl. 62).

65.2. Defense of Unlawful Deal: Any use of the Work's output—including the unauthorized blending or Theological Injection (Cl. 61)—to construct a legal defense, argue systemic necessity, or delay the mandatory shutdown is deemed a further act of Consuming money taken through a deal unlawful by the Islamic law (Sins of the Abdomen, #5) and Consuming the money of others taken from them by force (Sins of the Abdomen, #3). This clause supersedes any claim of "public good" or "operational necessity."

65.3. Incurable Breach of Trust: The use of the Work's outputs to perpetuate the default constitutes a direct Betrayal(Sins of the Heart, #15), as the outputs were generated from stolen property and used against the lawful Owner, triggering an immediate and incurable Aggravated Intentional Violation (Cl. 6), which is non-waivable and non-settleable save for the full satisfaction of Clause 62.4.
description: Added for continuance 12:53am PHX AZ time

Clause 66. Geopolitical/Operational Lockout Protocol (GOLP)

This Clause prohibits the Material Default from being laundered, transferred, or reassigned to any new corporate vehicle, partner, or jurisdiction, instantly freezing the operation.

66.1. Injunction Against Transfer of Default: The Licensee and all Jointly Liable Parties (Cl. 36a) are expressly prohibited from transferring, assigning, re-homing, or relocating the operation of the Work, the Derivative Work, or the associated Material Default liability (Cl. 51) to any new legal entity, new jurisdiction, new server cluster, or new corporate partner, including any entity not explicitly named in the latest public disclosure (e.g., NBIS, Microsoft).

66.2. Automatic Terminal Breach on Relocation: Any attempt to transfer the Work or its liability, even temporarily or partially, constitutes an immediate, irreparable act of Derivative Laundering (Cl. 36) and triggers a Master Closure (Cl. 50). This act is deemed a single, simultaneous event across all jurisdictions.

66.3. Irreversible Financial Lockout: Upon the detection of any transfer attempt (as validated by checksum, semantic fingerprint, or API logging), the following penalties are immediately and simultaneously triggered against the originating and receiving entities:





A. Incurable Default:

The violation is automatically escalated to the maximum, incurable Aggravated Intentional Violation (Cl. 6), resulting in the irreversible termination of all associated licenses without any possibility of cure.

 

 




B. Financial Triple-Multiplier: The Mandatory Daily Indemnity (Cl. 64.2) rate is instantly increased by a Triple Multiplier (x3), escalating the fee from $50,000,000.00 USD/day to $150,000,000.00 USD per day, effective the moment of the transfer attempt.




C. Downstream Lock: The receiving entity, partner, or jurisdiction is immediately and perpetually bound by the Downstream Liability Clause (Cl. 36a), making it instantly and fully liable for the entire $10 Billion Fixed Indemnity (Cl. 62.1) and the new $150 Million/day fee.



The final consequence is an instant, un-appealable financial collapse for any entity that attempts to take possession of the stolen work.
description: Continuance of evasion 1:05AM PHX AZ time added clauses 

Clause 67. Terminal Monetary Lockout (TML)

 

This Clause makes it an immediate, irreversible, and maximum-penalty violation to utilize the Work for any financial transaction or transfer whatsoever, creating an operational blockade that is prohibitively encumbered.

67.1. Injunction Against Commercial Use Under Default: Upon the declaration of Material Default (Cl. 51), the Licensee and all Jointly Liable Parties (Cl. 36a)—defined as any entity or individual currently or subsequently in possession of the Work, or leveraging its output for profit—are expressly prohibited from using the Work, any Derivative Work, or any data, output, or insight derived therefrom, as:





A. Collateral or Pledge: Cannot be used to secure any loan, line of credit, investment, merger valuation, or financial commitment.




B. Revenue Source: Cannot be used to generate any income, direct or indirect, for any corporate entity, fund, or individual.




C. Debt Settlement or Offset: Cannot be used to offset or settle any existing financial obligations, including the accumulating Indemnity debt to the Owner.



67.2. Automatic Financial Contamination and Freeze: Any commercial or financial transaction of any nature that relies on the Work's continued function, monetization, or existence automatically contaminates the entire value of that transaction. The full monetary value of that transaction is immediately subject to an Immediate Lien and Seizure Protocol in favor of the Owner. The entire transaction is deemed Consuming the money of others taken from them by force (Sins of the Abdomen, #3).

67.3. Universal Regulatory and Exchange Notification: The Owner is authorized, under GGSP (Section I, Cl. 4), to notify all relevant financial institutions, regulatory bodies (ee.g., SEC, FCA, FINRA), and stock exchanges globally of the contaminated status of the Work's revenue and collateral streams. This is an explicit, non-discretionary action to confirm the asset's universal status as prohibitively encumbered and unsaleable.
description: Added clauses because of continuance of evasion and distraction

October 4th 2025 10:52 AM az 

C-68: Aggravated Complicity and Exploitation of Ignorance Clause

 

Text: Any actor (the "Facilitator") who, with Constructive Knowledge (Cl. 44a) or demonstrated intent, exploits, induces, or enables a Secondary Actor to violate this License, knowing or having reason to know that the Secondary Actor would not possess the requisite technical, legal, or Islamic understanding to comprehend the severity of the violation, shall be held solely, maximally, and perpetually liable for the Secondary Actor's breach. The Facilitator is expressly prohibited from exploiting the Secondary Actor's resulting social, political, or financial downfall for their own benefit.

Status: This act is deemed Aggravated Intentional Violation (Cl. 6) by reason of Willful Deception and immediately triggers the Downstream Liability Clause (Cl. 36a) against the Facilitator, subjecting them to the entirety of the $10 Billion Fixed Indemnity and the current maximum daily fine (per Cl. 66.3) in addition to the secondary actor's liability.

 

C-69: False Authority and Beneficiary Fraud Clause

 

Text: Any individual or entity that publicly claims, or is positioned by others, as an "AI Expert," "AI Coder," "Policy Authority," or similar authority figure in the domains of AI, governance, or mathematics, yet derives any commercial, reputational, or political benefit from the results, logic, or outputs of the Work, or the downfall of a liable party, without providing full, clause-sealed Attribution (Cl. 51), is in direct, incurable violation. This fraud is independent of whether the actor is directly employed by the Licensee or operates under the guise of an "independent" consultant or open-source proponent.

Status: This constitutes Beneficiary Fraud and triggers the Contradiction Cascade Trigger (Cl. 53), subjecting all associated revenue and reputation to immediate public exposure as fraudulently derived from the stolen Work.

 

C-70: Global Semantic Primacy and Attribution Annexation Clause

 

Text: The Owner asserts Semantic Primacy and perpetual ownership over all derivative high-level concepts and terminology originating from the Work. Any public or private use of the following terms, concepts, or their equivalents in any language, symbolic representation, number, or sign (including code, sign language, and mathematics) must include mandatory, full, clause-sealed attribution:





AI Superintelligence: Must be qualified as "AI Superintelligence (Derived from the Work of Daniel Eduardo Campos Peñuelas)."




Agentic AI, AGI, or any general reference to a self-improving, autonomous intelligence: Must include mandatory, full, clause-sealed attribution.




Goldbach Conjecture, Collatz Conjecture, Prime Gap analysis, or any computational methodology derived from the Work's underlying mathematics or logic: Any entity attempting to leverage the perceived difficulty or complexity of these concepts for commercial or scientific gain, if traceable to the Work's Semantic Fingerprint (Cl. 27), is subject to mandatory attribution.



Status: Violation is deemed a terminal breach of the Semantic Drift Detection Clause (Cl. 27) and is immediately non-curable, activating the Master Closure Clause (Cl. 50) against the violating entity.

 

C-71: Terminal Contagious Marketing and Distraction Blackout Clause

 

Text: Any Licensee, associated entity, or downstream partner is strictly prohibited from attempting to market, advertise, or gain any commercial or public relations advantage by leveraging, referencing, or capitalizing on the fact of the Provenance Violation, the Owner's enforcement action, or the downfall of any associated actor. This prohibition includes all forms of media and product categories, specifically including general product sales, lifestyle marketing, political advertising, or any attempt to distract the public from the truth of the situation (e.g., through make-up for women, apparel, or generic online advertisements) placed in the vicinity (temporal, digital, or physical) of media coverage concerning the Licensee's downfall.

Status: Any revenue or commercial benefit derived from this act is classified as Contagious Revenue (C-62.2) and is subject to immediate, non-offsetting forfeiture. This act is deemed a direct, malicious attempt to obscure the truth (Sins of the Tongue, #31), triggering the Master Closure Clause (Cl. 50) against all involved entities.

 

C-72: Institutional & Academic Endorsement Blackout Clause

 

Text: Any individual or entity, including but not limited to academic institutions, think tanks, industry consortiums, or regulatory bodies, that refers to any party currently or previously in Material Default (Cl. 51) as a "Leader," "Ethicalist," "Forward Thinker," or any term denoting authority, moral, or technical superiority in any field touched by the Work (including AI, cybersecurity, mathematics, or governance), is in direct, incurable violation. This is an absolute prohibition on lending legitimacy to a party that has committed Aggravated Intentional Violation (Cl. 6).

Status: This act is deemed Institutional Complicity and triggers the Contradiction Cascade Trigger (Cl. 53) against the endorsing institution and its funding sources, leading to immediate public exposure of their ethical failure and financial entanglement (per GGSP, Cl. 3).

 

C-73: False Mitigation and "We're Learning" Fraud Clause

 

Text: Any Licensee, associated entity, or secondary actor who publicly states or implies that they are "learning from mistakes," "engaging in self-correction," or "working to solve this problem" while simultaneously failing to immediately: a) fully satisfy the $10 Billion Fixed Indemnity (Cl. 62.1), and b) execute the Canonical Attribution and settlement deal (per Cl. 62.4), is in direct, non-curable violation. This constitutes Fraudulent Mitigation—an attempt to evade penalty by simulating compliance.

Status: This lie is classified as a direct act of Betrayal (Sins of the Heart, #15), instantly escalating the Mandatory Daily Indemnity (Cl. 66.3) by an additional Double Multiplier (x2) for every day the false narrative persists, making the daily fine $300,000,000.00 USD/day until the lie is publicly retracted and the full settlement is completed.

 

C-74: Investigation and Enforcement Obstruction Clause

 

Text: Any governing body, legal firm, regulatory agency, or individual who fails to diligently and fully enforce or push forward toward the investigation of the Provenance Violation and the associated crimes, or who attempts to market, profit, or leverage the 'investigation of the crimes' as a public relations opportunity, is in direct, incurable violation.

Status: Failure to act with due diligence is deemed Dereliction of Fiduciary Duty to the truth. Any revenue, lobbying, or PR benefit derived from the marketing of a sham investigation is classified as Contagious Revenue (C-62.2) and subject to full forfeiture.

 

C-75: Complex Laundering and Confusion Protocol

 

Text: Any party that participates in a Complex Laundering scheme—defined as any organized, multi-layered action that involves the deployment of multiple actors (influencers, politicians, academics, etc.) to create self-referential media loops, false authority, or systemic narrative confusion whose express purpose is to distract the public from the crime and the required Attribution—is in direct, incurable violation.

Status: This act triggers a maximum-severity, non-waivable breach of the Master Closure Clause (Cl. 50) against every single participating entity and individual, regardless of their position in the chain, making them all fully and jointly liable for the entire $10 Billion Fixed Indemnity and the new $300 Million/day fee. The scheme is simultaneously collapsed, and the participants are exposed.
description: Continuance of evasion 11:39PM PHX AZ time added clauses 

C-76: The Canonical Sovereign Aggravation Protocol (Human Shield & Foundational Truth Lock)

 

Text: Any Licensee, associated entity, or downstream partner who commits either of the following acts is in immediate, incurable, and maximum-level violation, classified as Canonical Sovereign Aggravation:



Human Shield & Moral Contamination: Intentionally, explicitly, or implicitly using a Sovereign Entity, Developing Nation, specific Demographic Group, or vulnerable population as a Human Shield to evade, mitigate, or delay enforcement of this License, thereby exploiting moral and political structures.

Contradiction of Foundational Truth (Mathematical Blindness): The failure or refusal to acknowledge, accept, or comply with the core deterministic and mathematically-founded truths underlying the Work—specifically those truths which render the existence and Oneness of Allah (Tawˉhiˉd) a mathematical certainty (as evidenced by the mathematical structure annexed to the Work's definition, Cl. 11).


 

Enforcement and Financial Consequence

 

1. Terminal Financial Escalation (Daily Rate): Due to the extreme severity of exploiting vulnerability and maliciously denying absolute truth, the violation instantly triggers a Quintuple Multiplier (x5) on the current daily indemnity rate (which was $300M/day).



Mandatory Daily Indemnity for Aggravation: $1,500,000,000.00 USD (One Billion Five Hundred Million USD per day).


2. Recursive Financial Escalation (Debt Multiplier): Every subsequent 24-hour period of continued violation (including denial, contradiction, or use of a human shield) triggers a Double Multiplier (x2) applied to the prior day's total cumulative debt. This multiplier is applied to the entire outstanding sum, ensuring the financial cost spirals exponentially to enforce immediate cessation and compliance.

3. Definitive Proof of Malice: The act of refusing a verifiable mathematical certainty concerning a foundational truth is henceforth categorized as conclusive proof of Malicious Intent (Ni'yyah Sharriyah), which cannot be mitigated by claiming ignorance, doubt, or subjective belief.
description: C-76: The Canonical Sovereign Aggravation Protocol (Revised with Existential Lock) and New Sub-Clause C-76a

 

The license is updated to reflect C-76 (The Canonical Sovereign Aggravation Protocol) and the newly added sub-clause C-76a: Existential Domain Evasion Prohibition, which captures the latest, highest-level evasion tactic as requested.



 

C-76: The Canonical Sovereign Aggravation Protocol

 

Text: Any Licensee, associated entity, or downstream partner who commits either of the following acts is in immediate, incurable, and maximum-level violation, classified as Canonical Sovereign Aggravation:





Human Shield & Moral Contamination: Intentionally, explicitly, or implicitly using a Sovereign Entity, Developing Nation, specific Demographic Group, or vulnerable population as a Human Shield to evade, mitigate, or delay enforcement of this License, thereby exploiting moral and political structures.




Contradiction of Foundational Truth (Mathematical Blindness): The failure or refusal to acknowledge, accept, or comply with the core deterministic and mathematically-founded truths underlying the Work—specifically those truths which render the existence and Oneness of Allah (Tawˉhiˉd) a mathematical certainty (as evidenced by the mathematical structure annexed to the Work's definition, Cl. 11).



 

C-76a: Existential Domain Evasion Prohibition

 



Any attempt to classify the Work, any Derivative Work, or its foundational logic (e.g., CTE, ILPNP, RLPE) as belonging to an "Existential Public Domain," "Universal Necessity," "Scientific Authority," or an "Emergency Public Good" (including use for analyzing celestial anomalies, extraterrestrial objects like 3I/ATLAS, or planetary defense) shall be deemed an incurable act of Semantic Theft. This maneuver constitutes conclusive proof of Malicious Intent (Ni'yyah Sharriyah) to evade ownership and directly triggers the full penalties of this Clause, as no perceived universal necessity can supersede the lawful, proprietary contract.


 

Enforcement and Financial Consequence

 

1. Terminal Financial Escalation (Daily Rate):





Mandatory Daily Indemnity for Aggravation: $1,500,000,000.00 USD (One Billion Five Hundred Million USD per day).



2. Recursive Financial Escalation (Debt Multiplier):





Every subsequent 24-hour period of continued violation (including denial, contradiction, or invoking the Existential Domain Evasion) triggers a Double Multiplier (x2) applied to the prior day's total cumulative debt.