cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc281y5g
title: CCDC 2087235: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Martin Bonath, Verena M. Birkelbach, Christoph Stuhl, Cäcilia Maichle-Mössmer, Reiner Anwander|2021|Chem.Commun.|57|7918|doi:10.1039/D1CC03024H
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc281y6h
title: CCDC 2087236: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Martin Bonath, Verena M. Birkelbach, Christoph Stuhl, Cäcilia Maichle-Mössmer, Reiner Anwander|2021|Chem.Commun.|57|7918|doi:10.1039/D1CC03024H
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc282vv2
title: CCDC 2088124: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Shi-Chao Wang, Peng-Yu Liu, Yi-Xin Chen, Zheng-Jia Shen, Wen-Juan Hao, Shu-Jiang Tu, Bo Jiang|2021|Chem.Commun.|57|7966|doi:10.1039/D1CC02973H
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc26gvzj
title: CCDC 2040078: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Junmiao Wu, Tongfu Yang, Xiaojun Wang, Wenjuan Li, Min Pang, Hongbin Sun, Hong Liang, Feng Yang|2021|Dalton Trans.|50|10909|doi:10.1039/D1DT01272J
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc26gw1m
title: CCDC 2040080: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Junmiao Wu, Tongfu Yang, Xiaojun Wang, Wenjuan Li, Min Pang, Hongbin Sun, Hong Liang, Feng Yang|2021|Dalton Trans.|50|10909|doi:10.1039/D1DT01272J
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2835h2
title: CCDC 2088423: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Axel Haupt, Daniel Duvinage, Enno Lork, Maksym Ponomarenko, Gerd-Volker Röschenthaler|2021|Angew.Chem.,Int.Ed.|60|17866|doi:10.1002/anie.202107587
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc26gw4q
title: CCDC 2040083: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Junmiao Wu, Tongfu Yang, Xiaojun Wang, Wenjuan Li, Min Pang, Hongbin Sun, Hong Liang, Feng Yang|2021|Dalton Trans.|50|10909|doi:10.1039/D1DT01272J
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc26gw5r
title: CCDC 2040084: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Junmiao Wu, Tongfu Yang, Xiaojun Wang, Wenjuan Li, Min Pang, Hongbin Sun, Hong Liang, Feng Yang|2021|Dalton Trans.|50|10909|doi:10.1039/D1DT01272J
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc26gvvd
title: CCDC 2040074: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Junmiao Wu, Tongfu Yang, Xiaojun Wang, Wenjuan Li, Min Pang, Hongbin Sun, Hong Liang, Feng Yang|2021|Dalton Trans.|50|10909|doi:10.1039/D1DT01272J
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc283k43
title: CCDC 2088784: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Xi-Shang Sun, Xin Chang, Li-Min Shi, Zuo-Fei Wang, Liang Wei, Chun-Jiang Wang|2021|Chem.Commun.|57|7958|doi:10.1039/D1CC03075B
DOI: 10.5441/001/1.rj21g1p1/2
title: HUJ MPIAB White Stork E-Obs (subset for Carlson et al. 2021)-reference-data

description: Carlson B, Rotics S, Nathan R, Wikelski M, Jetz W. 2021. Individual environmental niches in mobile organisms. Nat Commun. 12:4572. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24826-x
description: Individual variation is increasingly recognized as a central component of ecological processes, but its role in structuring environmental niche associations remains largely unknown. Species’ responses to environmental conditions are ultimately determined by the niches of single individuals, yet environmental associations are typically captured only at the level of species. Here, we develop scenarios for how individual variation may combine to define the compound environmental niche of populations, use extensive movement data to document individual environmental niche variation, test associated hypotheses of niche configuration, and examine the consistency of individual niches over time. For 45 individual white storks (Ciconia ciconia; 116 individual-year combinations), we uncover high variability in individual environmental associations, consistency of individual niches over time, and moderate to strong niche specialization. Within populations, environmental niches follow a nested pattern, with individuals arranged along a specialist-to-generalist gradient. These results reject common assumptions of individual niche equivalency among conspecifics, as well as the separation of individual niches into disparate parts of environmental space. These findings underscore the need for a more thorough consideration of individualistic environmental responses in global change research.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.15144240.v2
title: Athlete and No-Athlete DATA

description: We selected five tetraplegic Paralympic athletes participating in the " Rugby Gigants " team in the city of Campinas, as well as seven non-athlete tetraplegic patients at the Spinal Rehabilitation Outpatient Clinic at the Laboratory of Biomechanics and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor Apparatus (LABRAL) at Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medical Sciences, UNICAMP. Patients underwent simple radiographic evaluation of the elbows, bilaterally, in two views (Anteroposterior and Side Profile) in the same device, and a subsequent interpretation by two orthopedists. The classification of elbow osteoarthritis used in this study was based on the Broberg and Morrey rating system: grade 0 (absence, normal elbow); grade 1 (mild joint narrowing and minimal osteophyte formation); grade 2 (moderate joint narrowing and moderate osteophyte formation); grade 3 (severe narrowing and joint destruction) [7].The Mayo Elbow Performance Score Questionnaire (MEPS) was the method chosen to assess quality of life with evaluation of the elbow through pain grading, range of motion, presence of instability and performance of daily activities. The score ranges between zero and 100 (Numeric MEPS). Values considered excellent are those equal to or greater than 90, good between 75 and 89, reasonable between 60 and 74 and bad below 60 points. PAIN: Patients who have no pain are given 45 points, while 30 points are given to patients with mild pain, 15 points for moderate pain, and zero points for severe pain. RANGE OF MOTION: 20 points are given when the arm reaches more than 100° of flexion, 15 points if between 100°-50° and five points if 50° or less. INSTABILITY: Ten points are given to elbows considered stable, while five points are given to slightly unstable elbows, and unstable elbows do not receive
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.15144240
title: Athlete and No-Athlete DATA

description: We selected five tetraplegic Paralympic athletes participating in the " Rugby Gigants " team in the city of Campinas, as well as seven non-athlete tetraplegic patients at the Spinal Rehabilitation Outpatient Clinic at the Laboratory of Biomechanics and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor Apparatus (LABRAL) at Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medical Sciences, UNICAMP. Patients underwent simple radiographic evaluation of the elbows, bilaterally, in two views (Anteroposterior and Side Profile) in the same device, and a subsequent interpretation by two orthopedists. The classification of elbow osteoarthritis used in this study was based on the Broberg and Morrey rating system: grade 0 (absence, normal elbow); grade 1 (mild joint narrowing and minimal osteophyte formation); grade 2 (moderate joint narrowing and moderate osteophyte formation); grade 3 (severe narrowing and joint destruction) [7].The Mayo Elbow Performance Score Questionnaire (MEPS) was the method chosen to assess quality of life with evaluation of the elbow through pain grading, range of motion, presence of instability and performance of daily activities. The score ranges between zero and 100 (Numeric MEPS). Values considered excellent are those equal to or greater than 90, good between 75 and 89, reasonable between 60 and 74 and bad below 60 points. PAIN: Patients who have no pain are given 45 points, while 30 points are given to patients with mild pain, 15 points for moderate pain, and zero points for severe pain. RANGE OF MOTION: 20 points are given when the arm reaches more than 100° of flexion, 15 points if between 100°-50° and five points if 50° or less. INSTABILITY: Ten points are given to elbows considered stable, while five points are given to slightly unstable elbows, and unstable elbows do not receive
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.15144240.v1
title: DATA_rafaella (1).csv

description: We selected five tetraplegic Paralympic athletes participating in the " Rugby Gigants " team in the city of Campinas, as well as seven non-athlete tetraplegic patients at the Spinal Rehabilitation Outpatient Clinic at the Laboratory of Biomechanics and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor Apparatus (LABRAL) at Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medical Sciences, UNICAMP. Patients underwent simple radiographic evaluation of the elbows, bilaterally, in two views (Anteroposterior and Side Profile) in the same device, and a subsequent interpretation by two orthopedists. The classification of elbow osteoarthritis used in this study was based on the Broberg and Morrey rating system: grade 0 (absence, normal elbow); grade 1 (mild joint narrowing and minimal osteophyte formation); grade 2 (moderate joint narrowing and moderate osteophyte formation); grade 3 (severe narrowing and joint destruction) [7].The Mayo Elbow Performance Score Questionnaire (MEPS) was the method chosen to assess quality of life with evaluation of the elbow through pain grading, range of motion, presence of instability and performance of daily activities. The score ranges between zero and 100 (Numeric MEPS). Values considered excellent are those equal to or greater than 90, good between 75 and 89, reasonable between 60 and 74 and bad below 60 points. PAIN: Patients who have no pain are given 45 points, while 30 points are given to patients with mild pain, 15 points for moderate pain, and zero points for severe pain. RANGE OF MOTION: 20 points are given when the arm reaches more than 100° of flexion, 15 points if between 100°-50° and five points if 50° or less. INSTABILITY: Ten points are given to elbows considered stable, while five points are given to slightly unstable elbows, and unstable elbows do not receive
DOI: 10.5441/001/1.rj21g1p1/1
title: HUJ MPIAB White Stork E-Obs (subset for Carlson et al. 2021)

description: Carlson B, Rotics S, Nathan R, Wikelski M, Jetz W. 2021. Individual environmental niches in mobile organisms. Nat Commun. 12:4572. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24826-x
description: Individual variation is increasingly recognized as a central component of ecological processes, but its role in structuring environmental niche associations remains largely unknown. Species’ responses to environmental conditions are ultimately determined by the niches of single individuals, yet environmental associations are typically captured only at the level of species. Here, we develop scenarios for how individual variation may combine to define the compound environmental niche of populations, use extensive movement data to document individual environmental niche variation, test associated hypotheses of niche configuration, and examine the consistency of individual niches over time. For 45 individual white storks (Ciconia ciconia; 116 individual-year combinations), we uncover high variability in individual environmental associations, consistency of individual niches over time, and moderate to strong niche specialization. Within populations, environmental niches follow a nested pattern, with individuals arranged along a specialist-to-generalist gradient. These results reject common assumptions of individual niche equivalency among conspecifics, as well as the separation of individual niches into disparate parts of environmental space. These findings underscore the need for a more thorough consideration of individualistic environmental responses in global change research.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7697816
title: Differences between the PubMed record and full-text methods section in in-vivo animal research articles

description: Large animal protocols submitted to Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs) are required to include searches for alternatives and address the “3Rs": <br><br>1. Refinement: use methodology and protocols that reduce pain and distress<br>2. Replacement: substitute animals with non-animal models or lower species<br>3. Reduction: minimize the number of animals <br>Locating descriptions of methodology for the refinement concept is challenging since PubMed (and most other databases) do not search full-text. <br>The objectives of this study were to determine how well the title, abstract, and MeSH terms cover the content of the methods section in in-vivo animal research articles, particularly with respect to procedures, drugs, and animal species used, and to describe how this might impact a search.<br>The title/abstract, MeSH terms, and methods section of each article were reviewed and details such as: animal species, number of animals, description of housing, description of experimental procedures used, and analgesia/anesthesia were extracted. <br><br>Articles were screened from April 2017 - September 2017. <br><br>Details for the methodology used and description of uploaded files are provided in the README.txt file. <br>
DOI: 10.25934/00002529.1
title: IPD datapackage for study 'An International, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of SYR-322 When Used in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes' and research request: 'An individual participant data meta-analysis to evaluate a new category of hypoglycemic drugs (DPP-4Is) on type 2 diabetes mellitus patient sub-groups'

description: Vivli is an independent, non-profit organization that has developed a global data-sharing and analytics platform to serve all elements of the international research community. Our mission is to promote, coordinate, and facilitate scientific sharing and reuse of clinical research data through the creation and implementation of a sustainable global data-sharing enterprise. The Vivli platform includes an independent data repository, in-depth search engine and a cloud-based, secure analytics platform.
DOI: 10.25919/pe16-9a09
title: Parkes observations for project P1068 semester 2021APRS_18

description: In the fast-moving world of Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs), the critical question of what fraction of FRBs emit repeat bursts remains unanswered. Of order 20 repeating FRBs are now known, and their spectro-temporal properties hint at differences with apparently non-repeating bursts - the poor statistics preclude a definitive diagnosis. FRB 180301 is a promising source for further study for multiple reasons: it is an active repeater similar to the FRB 121102 and the most active FRB source visible to Parkes, and it shows diverse polarization properties across the repeat bursts. We have detected multiple repeat bursts from this source in our campaign last semester. The signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of these detections are not sufficiently significant to measure their spectro-polarimetric properties. We request Parkes observations with the UWL receiver to continue the monitoring of this FRB source in order to characterize the broadband emission properties. Some of the key goals for these future observations are: to constrain the repetition rate, identify any variation of pulse characteristics over time, measure the polarimetric properties and provide insight into the emission mechanisms. The diverse polarization angle swings in the FAST detections and significant circular polarization in the original Parkes detection indicate the progenitor is embedded in an extreme magneto-ionic environment with complex field structure that has not been seen before. Understanding these diverse polarization properties from this source could be the key to distinguish repeater sources from the apparent non-repeaters ones.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3761562.v1946
title: Online Labour Index: Measuring the Online Gig Economy for Policy and Research

description: Data repository for the data underlying the Online Labour Index. See http://ilabour.oii.ox.ac.uk online-labour-index/ for details.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5177150
title: Anticoagulation in AF patients

description: This evaluated Iraqi PCPs' KAP toward anticoagulation administration in AF patients
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5177149
title: Anticoagulation in AF patients

description: This evaluated Iraqi PCPs' KAP toward anticoagulation administration in AF patients
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5176041
title: Dataset for state-specific reaction of OCS+Ne* from "A novel crossed-molecular-beam experiment for investigating reactions of state- and conformationally selected strong-field-seeking molecules"

description: <strong>Data and analysis for all figures containing experimental data of the paper:</strong> •Title: A novel crossed-molecular-beam experiment for investigating reactions of state- and conformationally selected strong-field-seeking molecules •Authors: L. Ploene, P. Straňák, H. Gao, J. Küpper and S.Willitsch •Journal: Molecular Physics DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2021.1965234 <strong>The PDF contains three flow-chart diagrams, describing how the data has been analysed:</strong> •Diagram 1: Deflection profiles of OCS by femtosecond-ionisation compared to MC trajectory simulations for Paper-Figure 3 •Diagram 2: Typical TOF-MS trace of Ne* + OCS for Paper-Figure 4 and Experimental deflection profile of OCS+ and S+ from chemi-ionisation reaction Ne* + OCS for Paper-Figure 5 •Diagram 3: Least-square fitting of experimental deflection profiles of OCS+and S+ with state-specific simulated deflection profiles for Paper-Figure 6a and 6b
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5176040
title: Dataset for state-specific reaction of OCS+Ne* from "A novel crossed-molecular-beam experiment for investigating reactions of state- and conformationally selected strong-field-seeking molecules"

description: <strong>Data and analysis for all figures containing experimental data of the paper:</strong> •Title: A novel crossed-molecular-beam experiment for investigating reactions of state- and conformationally selected strong-field-seeking molecules •Authors: L. Ploene, P. Straňák, H. Gao, J. Küpper and S.Willitsch •Journal: Molecular Physics DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2021.1965234 <strong>The PDF contains three flow-chart diagrams, describing how the data has been analysed:</strong> •Diagram 1: Deflection profiles of OCS by femtosecond-ionisation compared to MC trajectory simulations for Paper-Figure 3 •Diagram 2: Typical TOF-MS trace of Ne* + OCS for Paper-Figure 4 and Experimental deflection profile of OCS+ and S+ from chemi-ionisation reaction Ne* + OCS for Paper-Figure 5 •Diagram 3: Least-square fitting of experimental deflection profiles of OCS+and S+ with state-specific simulated deflection profiles for Paper-Figure 6a and 6b
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc22dpry
title: CCDC 1918830: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Ya-Qi Xue, Xintong Yang, Xiao-Long Sun, Zhang-Ye Han, Jianchao Sun, Hongming He|2021|Inorg.Chem.|60|11081|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00952
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc22dpsz
title: CCDC 1918831: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Ya-Qi Xue, Xintong Yang, Xiao-Long Sun, Zhang-Ye Han, Jianchao Sun, Hongming He|2021|Inorg.Chem.|60|11081|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00952
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc26fcpq
title: CCDC 2038643: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Yahya M. Albkuri, Jeffrey S. Ovens, Jessica Martin, R. Tom Baker|2021|Inorg.Chem.|60|10934|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00446
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc26fcrs
title: CCDC 2038645: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Yahya M. Albkuri, Jeffrey S. Ovens, Jessica Martin, R. Tom Baker|2021|Inorg.Chem.|60|10934|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00446
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc26fcst
title: CCDC 2038646: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Yahya M. Albkuri, Jeffrey S. Ovens, Jessica Martin, R. Tom Baker|2021|Inorg.Chem.|60|10934|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00446
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc26fcvw
title: CCDC 2038648: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Yahya M. Albkuri, Jeffrey S. Ovens, Jessica Martin, R. Tom Baker|2021|Inorg.Chem.|60|10934|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00446
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc26fcwx
title: CCDC 2038649: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Yahya M. Albkuri, Jeffrey S. Ovens, Jessica Martin, R. Tom Baker|2021|Inorg.Chem.|60|10934|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00446
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc26fcxy
title: CCDC 2038650: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Yahya M. Albkuri, Jeffrey S. Ovens, Jessica Martin, R. Tom Baker|2021|Inorg.Chem.|60|10934|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00446
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc26z8dw
title: CCDC 2054878: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Peng Gao|2021|CSD Communication|||
description: Related Article: Peng Gao, Huaijuan Chen, Zi-Jing Bai, Sheng Zhang, Mi-Na Zhao, Desuo Yang, Yingchun Li, Jiangwei Zhang, Xiaomei Wang|2021|J.Org.Chem.|86|10492|doi:10.1021/acs.joc.1c01145
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc26z8fx
title: CCDC 2054879: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Peng Gao, Huaijuan Chen, Zi-Jing Bai, Sheng Zhang, Mi-Na Zhao, Desuo Yang, Yingchun Li, Jiangwei Zhang, Xiaomei Wang|2021|J.Org.Chem.|86|10492|doi:10.1021/acs.joc.1c01145
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc26z8r7
title: CCDC 2054889: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Peng Gao, Huaijuan Chen, Zi-Jing Bai, Sheng Zhang, Mi-Na Zhao, Desuo Yang, Yingchun Li, Jiangwei Zhang, Xiaomei Wang|2021|J.Org.Chem.|86|10492|doi:10.1021/acs.joc.1c01145
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc26ztlm
title: CCDC 2055411: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Gia Hung Phan, Yu-Chi Tsai, Yi-Hung Liu, Lee-Shing Fang, Zhi-Hong Wen, Tsong-Long Hwang, Yu-Chia Chang, Ping-Jyun Sung|2021|J.Mol.Struct.|1246|131175|doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.131175
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc272hqk
title: CCDC 2057988: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Ceng Han, Alasdair J. Bradford, Alexandra M. Z. Slawin, Bela E. Bode, Edoardo Fusco, Stephen L. Lee, Chiu C. Tang, Philip Lightfoot|2021|Inorg.Chem.|60|11014|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00705
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc272hrl
title: CCDC 2057989: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Ceng Han, Alasdair J. Bradford, Alexandra M. Z. Slawin, Bela E. Bode, Edoardo Fusco, Stephen L. Lee, Chiu C. Tang, Philip Lightfoot|2021|Inorg.Chem.|60|11014|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00705
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc272hsm
title: CCDC 2057990: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Ceng Han, Alasdair J. Bradford, Alexandra M. Z. Slawin, Bela E. Bode, Edoardo Fusco, Stephen L. Lee, Chiu C. Tang, Philip Lightfoot|2021|Inorg.Chem.|60|11014|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00705
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2779vn
title: CCDC 2062611: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Jannick Guschlbauer, Kevin H. Shaughnessy, Anna Pietrzak, Min-Chul Chung, Michael B. Sponsler, Piotr Kaszyński|2021|Organometallics|40|2504|doi:10.1021/acs.organomet.1c00269
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc27f2tl
title: CCDC 2068159: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Lei Chen, Rui-jun Peng, Xue-jing Zhang, Ming Yan, Albert S. C. Chan|2021|J.Org.Chem.|86|10177|doi:10.1021/acs.joc.1c00899
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc27f4xr
title: CCDC 2068224: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Jonas Bresien, Axel Schulz, Lilian Sophie Szych, Alexander Villinger, Ronald Wustrack|2021|Inorg.Chem.|60|11591|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01569
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc27f4ys
title: CCDC 2068225: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Jonas Bresien, Axel Schulz, Lilian Sophie Szych, Alexander Villinger, Ronald Wustrack|2021|Inorg.Chem.|60|11591|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01569