cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr36228
title: New Careers in Nursing (NCIN) Alumni Survey, 2013
title: Archival Version

description: This survey was conducted as part of an evaluation of New Careers in Nursing (NCIN), a national scholarship program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation for nursing students from underrepresented groups in nursing or from disadvantaged backgrounds. It was founded in 2008 to help alleviate the nursing shortage, increase the diversity of nursing professionals, expand capacity in baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs, and enhance the pipeline of potential nurse faculty. The survey explored NCIN alumni employment in nursing, career aspirations and advanced education after they graduated from their nursing degree program. Additionally, respondents were asked to rate various aspects of their nursing degree program. Other topics covered by the survey include leadership and mentoring experiences, the reputation of NCIN among employers, student loans and alumni demographics.
description: Response Rates: 31 percent
description: The survey attempted to interview all NCIN alumni who graduated before the cut-off date.
description: Datasets: 
DS1: New Careers in Nursing (NCIN) Alumni Survey, 2013
description: Alumni of New Careers in Nursing (NCIN) scholars who graduated prior to September 2012. The September cut-off date was selected so that respondents would have at least six months of post-degree experiences to report by the time the survey was launched. Altogether, there were 1,682 NCIN alumni representing 97 schools of nursing who graduated before the cut-off date.
description: web-based survey
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr36228.v1
title: New Careers in Nursing (NCIN) Alumni Survey, 2013
title: Version 1

description: This survey was conducted as part of an evaluation of New Careers in Nursing (NCIN), a national scholarship program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation for nursing students from underrepresented groups in nursing or from disadvantaged backgrounds. It was founded in 2008 to help alleviate the nursing shortage, increase the diversity of nursing professionals, expand capacity in baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs, and enhance the pipeline of potential nurse faculty. The survey explored NCIN alumni employment in nursing, career aspirations and advanced education after they graduated from their nursing degree program. Additionally, respondents were asked to rate various aspects of their nursing degree program. Other topics covered by the survey include leadership and mentoring experiences, the reputation of NCIN among employers, student loans and alumni demographics.
description: ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of 
				disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major 
				statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to 
				these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection:
			   		Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes..
description: Response Rates: 
					31 percent
description: Datasets: 
					
						DS1: Dataset
description: web-based survey
description: Alumni of New Careers in Nursing (NCIN) scholars who graduated prior to September 2012. The September cut-off date was selected so that respondents would have at least six months of post-degree experiences to report by the time the survey was launched. Altogether, there were 1,682 NCIN alumni representing 97 schools of nursing who graduated before the cut-off date.
description: The survey attempted to interview all NCIN alumni who graduated before the cut-off date.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr36228.v2
title: New Careers in Nursing (NCIN) Alumni Survey, 2013
title: Version 2

description: This survey was conducted as part of an evaluation of New Careers in Nursing (NCIN), a national scholarship program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation for nursing students from underrepresented groups in nursing or from disadvantaged backgrounds. It was founded in 2008 to help alleviate the nursing shortage, increase the diversity of nursing professionals, expand capacity in baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs, and enhance the pipeline of potential nurse faculty. The survey explored NCIN alumni employment in nursing, career aspirations and advanced education after they graduated from their nursing degree program. Additionally, respondents were asked to rate various aspects of their nursing degree program. Other topics covered by the survey include leadership and mentoring experiences, the reputation of NCIN among employers, student loans and alumni demographics.
description: Response Rates: 31 percent
description: The survey attempted to interview all NCIN alumni who graduated before the cut-off date.
description: Datasets: 
DS1: New Careers in Nursing (NCIN) Alumni Survey, 2013
description: Alumni of New Careers in Nursing (NCIN) scholars who graduated prior to September 2012. The September cut-off date was selected so that respondents would have at least six months of post-degree experiences to report by the time the survey was launched. Altogether, there were 1,682 NCIN alumni representing 97 schools of nursing who graduated before the cut-off date.
description: web-based survey
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr36433
title: Healthy Americas Survey, 2014
title: Archival Version

description: The Healthy Americas Survey interviewed Hispanics, white non-Hispanics and black non-Hispanics about their health status; smoking; leisure-time physical activities; consumption of fruit and vegetables, sugary drinks, and sodium; preventive health checkups and vaccinations; chronic conditions; health insurance and access to health care; knowledge of and opinions about the Affordable Care Act; and use of the ACA marketplace websites. Personal characteristics covered by the survey include age, sex, education, religion, marital status, employment status, race, Hispanic origin, country of birth, income, and household composition.
description: Response Rates: 11.4 percent
description: The Healthy Americas Survey was implemented as an insert to the EXCEL Omnibus Survey, a national, weekly, dual frame bilingual telephone survey conducted by Social Science Research Solutions/SSRS. Respondents were selected using randomly generated landline and cell phone numbers. The interviews were conducted over four waves of the SSRS Omnibus fielded during February 16 to March 2, 2014.
description: Datasets: DS1: Healthy Americas Survey, 2014
description: Hispanics, white non-Hispanics and black non-Hispanics ages 18 and over.
description: computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI)Additional information about the survey is available on the Healthy Americas Institute website.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr35024
title: Mexico Panel Study, 2012
title: Archival Version

description: The Mexico 2012 Panel Study is a two-wave, major survey research project on Mexico's 2012 general election campaign with a focus on vote buying and the impact of crime and violence on vote choices. It is roughly comparable in scope to the American National Election Studies and the British Elections Studies. Similar to the Mexico 2000 and Mexico 2006 Panel Studies, it is intended to be a resource for scholars working on campaigns, public opinion, voting behavior, and political communication, whether they focus on Mexico or not. The 2012 Panel Study examines democratic consolidation in Mexico through the lens of electoral politics and documents how the mass public, the candidates, the political parties, and the media interact to shape the subjects of electoral contests - taking into account the possibility that political elites may anticipate the preferences of ordinary citizens and of other elites. The goal of the study was to understand why electoral campaigns highlight or downplay certain issues, and to assess the implications of these dynamics for democratic governance. Some of the questions in this study include "Who sets the agenda in Mexican elections?", "To what extent does this agenda respond to, engage, or ignore ordinary citizens?", and "What do the dynamics of 'issue emergence' mean for democratic representation?". Demographic variables include, age, sex, civil/marital status, education, income, occupation, social class, and religion.
description: The 2012 Mexico Panel Study examines the extent to which political campaigns remain a top-down process in Mexico's democracy. Combined with past research on Mexico's 2000 and 2006 presidential campaign, data from this project helps to shed light on key issues in democratic consolidation.
description: Population weights
description: ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Performed consistency checks.; Created variable labels and/or value labels.; Standardized missing values.; Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes..
description: Response Rates: Approximately 70 percent
description: Datasets: 
 
 DS0: Study-Level Files 
 DS1: Public Use Data (Spanish Language) 
 DS2: Public Use Data (English Language) 
 DS3: Restricted Use Data (Spanish Language) 
 DS4: Restricted Use Data (English Language)
description: face-to-face interview
description: Mexican adults, pre- and post-2012 national elections. Smallest Geographic Unit: Polling station
description: Random stratified sample of Mexican eligible voters.
DOI: 10.3886/e170541
title: National Getis-Ord Gi* statistics for select populations; 1990-2019

description: Local Getis-Ord Gi* statistics were calculated as a measure of residential segregation. Measures were calculated at the census tract level based on the proportion of non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian [and Pacific Islander for 1990 and 2000 census], Hispanic, and immigrant persons (regardless of country of origin; 2008-2012 only) per census tract. Gi* statistics are Z-scores that compare the proportion of the population in the focal tract and its neighboring tracts to the average proportion of a larger geographic unit. For the majority of tracts, the larger geographic unit was the Core-Based Statistical Area (CBSA) these tracts belonged to. The county was used as the larger unit for tracts that fell outside the boundaries of a CBSA.<br><br>Data for the measures were obtained from the IPUMS National Historical Geographic Information System (NHGIS) data finder. Data were downloaded for the 1990 and 2000 census, and the 2006-2009, 2008-2012 (Immigrant segregation only), 2010-2014, and 2015-2019 5-year American Community Survey (ACS) estimates. Geographically standardized time series tables were used for 1990 and 2000 census data. All other ACS data were standardized to 2010 census tract boundaries.<br><br>G*statistics were calculated using both Rook and Queen conceptualization of spatial relationships. With Rook contiguity, neighbors are determined by those that share a common edge only, while Queen contiguity neighbors are those that share both an edge or a "corner" (common vertex). See detailed documentation for further details.<br>
description: Proportion of persons non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian and Pacific Islander, and Hispanic in 1990. <br>Proportion of persons non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian and Pacific Islander, and Hispanic in 2000. <br>Proportion of persons non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic; 2006-2009 5-year ACS estimates. <br>Proportion of persons non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic; 2010-2014 5-year ACS estimates.<br>Proportion of persons non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic; 2015-2019 5-year ACS estimates. <br>. Smallest Geographic Unit: Census tract
DOI: 10.3886/e170541v3-165163
title: National Getis-Ord Gi* statistics for select populations; 1990-2019

description: Local Getis-Ord Gi* statistics were calculated as a measure of residential segregation. Measures were calculated at the census tract level based on the proportion of non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian [and Pacific Islander for 1990 and 2000 census], Hispanic, and immigrant persons (regardless of country of origin; 2008-2012 only) per census tract. Gi* statistics are Z-scores that compare the proportion of the population in the focal tract and its neighboring tracts to the average proportion of a larger geographic unit. For the majority of tracts, the larger geographic unit was the Core-Based Statistical Area (CBSA) these tracts belonged to. The county was used as the larger unit for tracts that fell outside the boundaries of a CBSA.<br><br>Data for the measures were obtained from the IPUMS National Historical Geographic Information System (NHGIS) data finder. Data were downloaded for the 1990 and 2000 census, and the 2006-2009, 2008-2012 (Immigrant segregation only), 2010-2014, and 2015-2019 5-year American Community Survey (ACS) estimates. Geographically standardized time series tables were used for 1990 and 2000 census data. All other ACS data were standardized to 2010 census tract boundaries.<br><br>G*statistics were calculated using both Rook and Queen conceptualization of spatial relationships. With Rook contiguity, neighbors are determined by those that share a common edge only, while Queen contiguity neighbors are those that share both an edge or a "corner" (common vertex). See detailed documentation for further details.<br>
description: Proportion of persons non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian and Pacific Islander, and Hispanic in 1990. <br>Proportion of persons non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian and Pacific Islander, and Hispanic in 2000. <br>Proportion of persons non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic; 2006-2009 5-year ACS estimates. <br>Proportion of persons non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic; 2010-2014 5-year ACS estimates.<br>Proportion of persons non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic; 2015-2019 5-year ACS estimates. <br>. Smallest Geographic Unit: Census tract
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr35630
title: Sit-ins and Desegregation in the U.S. South in the Early 1960s
title: Archival Version

description: This study examines the causes and consequences of sit-ins in the American South. It was motivated by four questions: (1) Why did sit-ins occur in some cities rather than others in the spring of 1960? (2) Did movement organizations grow faster where sit-ins occurred? (3) Why did desegregation occur in some cities but not others in 1960-1961? (4) Was desegregation more likely where sit-ins occurred? To answer these questions, data was collected on cities in the states of the former Confederacy plus Maryland, Kentucky, and West Virginia. All urban places with a population of at least 10,000 and a Black population of at least 1,000 are included. These provide the 334 observations. Variables include dates of sit-in protest and of the desegregation of lunch counters, social and economic characteristics from the 1960 Census, geographical location, Civil Rights organizations, newspaper circulation, and athletic affiliations of Black colleges.
description: This study examines the causes and consequences of sit-ins in the American South. It was motivated by four questions: (1) Why did sit-ins occur in some cities rather than others in the spring of 1960? (2) Did movement organizations grow faster where sit-ins occurred? (3) Why did desegregation occur in some cities but not others in 1960-1961? (4) Was desegregation more likely where sit-ins occurred?
description: Data was collected on cities in the states of the former Confederacy plus Maryland, Kentucky, and West Virginia. All urban places with a population of at least 10,000 and a Black population of at least 1,000 are included.
description: Variables include dates of sit-in protests and of the desegregation of lunch counters, social and economic characteristics from the 1960 Census, geographical location, Civil Rights organizations, newspaper circulation, and athletic affiliations of black colleges.
description: ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Performed consistency checks.; Created variable labels and/or value labels.; Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes..
description: Datasets: 
 
 DS1: Dataset
description: Cities in the American South, defined as states of the former Confederacy plus Maryland, Kentucky, and West Virginia Smallest Geographic Unit: City
description: All urban places with a total population of at least ten thousand and a nonwhite population of at least one thousand in 1960.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.he5z3v
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 108 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "BasisOfRecord is Human Observation",
 "Country is Mexico",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 "StateProvince is Tabasco",
 "TaxonKey is Dendrocygna bicolor (Vieillot, 1816)"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 108 records from 5 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0000237-250127130748423/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.57677/ucal00can
title: UCAL00CAN: DLR's GNSS Tracking Station in Calgary (Canada)
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr06275
title: Surveys of Undergraduate Students in the College of Literature, Science, and the Arts, University of Michigan, 1972-1991
title: Archival Version

description: This data collection is the result of surveys of undergraduate students at the University of Michigan enrolled in the College of Literature, Science, and the Arts during the period 1972 to 1991. As part of an undergraduate research methods course primarily for sociology majors, students and staff developed survey instruments, each with a central focus and other timely substantive content. Major focus areas were related to academics and student life, such as life on a university campus, study habits, academic performance, major source of college funding, use of alcoholic beverages, and campus law enforcement. Other topics covered were rights of women, military draft, Equal Rights Amendment, homosexuality, racial attitudes and experiences, and affirmative action. Students were also asked their views on Clarence Thomas, the Holocaust, Saddam Hussein, troops in Saudi Arabia, Ronald Reagan, and other topics. Data are provided for 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1979, 1984, 1990, and 1991. Demographic variables include religion, sex, grade-point average, ethnicity, area of birth, parents' education, and area of academic study.
description: Systematic sample.
description: Datasets: DS0: Study-Level Files DS1: 1972 Data DS2: 1973 Data DS3: 1975 Data DS4: 1977 Data DS5: 1979 Data DS6: 1980 Data DS7: 1981 Data DS8: 1982 Data DS9: 1983 Data DS10: 1984 Data DS11: 1990 Winter Data DS12: 1990 Fall Data DS13: 1991 Data
description: All students registered in the College of Literature, Science, and the Arts at the University of Michigan at the time of the surveys.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr09743
title: Survey of Households in Five Judicial Districts of the United States: A Civil Litigation Project, 1977-1979
title: Archival Version

description: This data collection is based on the household screening survey conducted by the Civil Litigation Research Project (CLRP) in 1980. The survey was conducted in five federal judicial districts in the United States: Eastern Wisconsin, Eastern Pennsylvania, South Carolina, New Mexico, and Central California. The primary objective of the study was to identify individuals involved in disputes that might have become lawsuits. The major area of investigation was claiming behavior. The dataset also includes 54 households from the "screened experiment," whereby households known to have been involved in lawsuits were contacted. Demographic variables include the age, sex, education, occupation, and union status of the chief wage earner. Also included are the respondent's sex, race, and family income. Questions were asked about consumer problems, problems with persons who owed the respondent money, discrimination problems, debt problems, property-related problems, mortgage-related problems, landlord-tenant problems, problems with government benefits, and post-divorce problems. The unit of analysis is the household.
description: Cluster sampling using a random digit dialing technique.
description: Datasets: DS1: Survey of Households in Five Judicial Districts of the United States: A Civil Litigation Project, 1977-1979
description: Households with telephones in five federal judicial districts in the United States.
description: In this hierarchical dataset there are a total of 14 different record types, with the number of records and variables varying from household to household. There are 116 variables for type (1) records, 10 variables for type (2) records, 51 variables for type (3) records, 10 variables for type (4) records, 11 variables for type (5) records, 8 variables for type (6) records, 6 variables for type (7) records, 14 variables for type (8) records, 15 variables for type (9) records, 7 variables for type (10) records, 6 variables for type (11) variables, 7 variables for type (12) variables, 5 variables for type (13) records, and 8 variables for type (14) variables. A total of 5,202 households were sampled. This collection is a revision and extension of Part 3 of CIVIL LITIGATION IN THE UNITED STATES, 1977-1979 (ICPSR 7994).