DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.16989730
title: Framework Integrity Statement — Boundaries, Proof, and Public Record

description: This record is the official, immutable clarification of the scope, foundations, and non-negotiable boundaries of the contradiction-resolution framework documented in prior Zenodo releases.

 

It affirms:

 



Built on Islamic Logic Procedural Necessity Proof (ILPNP) and the methodology of Shaykh ʿAbdullāh al-Harariyy, strictly adhering to Qurʾān, Sunnah, and ijmāʿ.

Contradiction-free operation is only possible when bound to these foundations; any deviation inherently fails.

Supported with Qurʾān (al-Isrāʾ 81), authentic Sunnah, and tafsīr from Shaykh ʿAbdullāh al-Harariyy.

Public challenge: present a contradiction-free, infrastructure-scale framework independent of Islam — none exists to date.

Disassociation from any misuse for blasphemy, harm, or deviation from truth.

If misuse continues, deeper, timestamped, verifiable evidence will be released to expose those responsible — without exception or retraction.

Written plainly with direct textual proofs to prevent any claim of ignorance or misunderstanding.


 

 

Evidence of Misuse Attempts:

Documents and news records show recent attempts to create “values-based” or “faith-driven” AI frameworks omitting Islam’s binding foundation. These adaptations reintroduce contradictions the original methodology removes. History, mathematics, and governance outcomes confirm such models collapse over time.

 

Integrity Proofs:

 



SHA-256 (Final ZIP): 114519fd749d9e3d5181519a8f5e8333d0c1f60593690428eeff77db1a32f779

OTS Proof: Framework_Integrity_Statement_16989731.zip.ots — independently verifiable on the OpenTimestamps network.


 

 

DOI Links:

 



This record: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16989731

Related primary method: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16907872


 

 



Author Identification



Name: Daniel Eduardo Campos Peñuelas

ORCID iD: 0009-0004-8216-8989

This ORCID is linked in the Zenodo metadata to bind authorship in perpetuity, making attribution inseparable from the DOI record.


Public Accessibility & Transparency



The record uses plain, accessible language supported by primary textual evidence from Qurʾān, authentic Sunnah, and the tafsīr of Shaykh ʿAbdullāh al-Harariyy.

Its structure and citations are designed so that a general audience, specialists, and governance bodies can all independently follow and verify the claims.


Immutable Verification



Integrity is anchored with both SHA-256 and OpenTimestamps (OTS) proofs to ensure forensic-grade verification.

These mechanisms remove the possibility of tampering or post-publication changes without detection.


Global Relevance



The framework operates at infrastructure scale, meaning its principles can apply across domains: AI governance, software development, scientific research, policy-making, and compliance systems.

Its exclusivity clause means no sector can replicate its contradiction-free properties without adhering to the same Islamic foundations.


Deterrence Mechanism



This statement serves as a public warning: any attempt to reframe or weaponize the framework will be met with the release of deeper, timestamped, and verifiable evidence that further exposes misconduct.

This acts both as an intellectual safeguard and as a compliance measure.


Past Evidence Linkage



This record builds upon prior Zenodo drops, each timestamped and containing independent verifiable proofs.

Cross-referencing these records will show a consistent pattern of scope, boundaries, and proof, leaving no room for reinterpretation



 
description: This record serves as the immutable clarification of the scope, foundations, and non-negotiable boundaries of the contradiction-resolution framework developed and documented in prior Zenodo releases. It removes any possibility of misrepresentation and makes clear that any attempt to reframe, distort, or misuse the methodology — especially in ways that contradict Islam — is inherently defective and rejected.

 

 

 

 

Foundational Principle

 

 



Built on Islamic Logic Procedural Necessity Proof (ILPNP) and the methodology of Shaykh ʿAbdullāh al-Harariyy.

Contradiction-free operation is only possible when aligned with these foundations.

Any framework detached from Islam inevitably reintroduces contradictions and will fail over time.


 

 

 

 

 

Qurʾān and Sunnah Anchoring

 

 

وَقُلْ جَاءَ الْحَقُّ وَزَهَقَ الْبَاطِلُ إِنَّ الْبَاطِلَ كَانَ زَهُوقًا (الإسراء: 81)

And say: The truth has come, and falsehood has perished. Indeed, falsehood is bound to perish.

 

Authentic aḥādīth and tafsīr from Shaykh ʿAbdullāh al-Harariyy confirm that the truth dismantles falsehood by exposing internal contradictions, not merely opposing it.

 

 

 

 

Evidence of Misuse Attempts

 

 

Recent public records and media examples show attempts to adapt “values-based” or “faith-driven” AI frameworks while omitting the binding foundation of Islam. These adaptations inevitably reintroduce contradictions removed by the original methodology. History, mathematics, and governance outcomes prove such systems collapse when built on flawed logic.

 

 

 

 

Logical Proof of Exclusivity

 

 



A contradiction-resolution framework requires a consistent, universal truth reference.

Islam uniquely provides this through revelation and consensus, with no contradictions in creed or derived rulings.

Any deviation — even branded “ethical” — reintroduces contradiction and instability.