DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17926281
title: DINSE-X Version-5: Law-First Sovereign AI Governance, Security, and Civilizational Continuity Framework  Ultimate Strategic & Doctrinal Edition (2025)

description:  



📘 FINAL ZENODO DESCRIPTION

DINSE-X Version-5: Law-First Sovereign AI Governance, Security & Civilizational Continuity Framework

(Ultimate Strategic & Doctrinal Edition | 2025)



Abstract

DINSE-X Version-5 represents the definitive evolution of the DINSE-X framework into a law-first, sovereign, and judicially anchored doctrine for artificial intelligence governance at national, international, and civilizational scales.

Building upon the strategic, technical, and security foundations of earlier editions, Version-5 introduces a fully canonized governance architecture that integrates constitutional legality, judicial supremacy, human sovereignty, post-quantum security, and systemic auditability into a single coherent framework.

Designed for governments, courts, defense institutions, regulators, and global governance bodies, DINSE-X V5 establishes an interpretively stable, legally defensible, and future-resilient foundation for governing advanced AI systems without delegating authority to automation or undermining democratic control.



Extended Description

DINSE-X Version-5 constitutes the most mature and institution-ready release of the DINSE-X framework, explicitly engineered to function within constitutional democracies, rule-of-law systems, and international legal order.

This Ultimate Edition is distinguished by its law-first orientation, ensuring that artificial intelligence remains permanently subordinate to human authority, judicial review, and fundamental rights.

Core Pillars of DINSE-X Version-5

1. Sovereign & Strategic Foundations



AI as a strategic center of gravity without sovereign status

Collapse of traditional deterrence and rise of cognitive warfare

Digital and constitutional sovereignty preservation

State responsibility in high-autonomy environments

Post-quantum threat realism without emergency exceptionalism


2. Law-First Governance Doctrine



Explicit rejection of autonomous or self-authorizing AI

Judicial supremacy over all AI-assisted governance

Human command, accountability, and reversibility at all times

Non-delegation of legislative, executive, and judicial authority

Rights as structural limits, not policy preferences


3. Advanced Technical & Security Architecture



DINSE-X architecture stack (TACF, SEA-X, SFIN, MSP, DPI-X)

Zero-Trust and failure-containment design

Federated intelligence orchestration under lawful command

Secure cross-border AI coordination without authority leakage

Post-quantum cryptographic readiness


4. Mathematical, Risk & Validation Models



HLM-X, TPS-3, R-Index 2.0, CDT-Index

Quantum-Threat Score (QTS)

Confidence, reliability, and failure-mode modeling

National and coalition-level wargaming validation


5. Constitutional, Legal & Ethical Integration



Multi-jurisdiction constitutional alignment

Mapping to UDHR, ICCPR, Budapest Convention, Tallinn Manual

Ethical failure-mode catalogues and rights-preserving constraints

Institutional accountability and judicial review pathways


6. National & International Deployment Architecture



Law-compliant national deployment roadmaps

DINSE-X Authority, Audit Body, and Red-Team protocols

Sectoral governance models (Defense, Health, Finance, Education)

Interoperability with UN, NATO, EU, and multilateral coalitions


7. Civilizational Continuity & Long-Horizon Stability



Cognitive, bio-digital, and socio-technical transition risks

Civilizational continuity doctrine

Global AI Trust Fabric (GATF-100)

Universal Adoption Architecture (UAA-X)


8. Reproducibility, Audit & Certification



Government-grade audit standards

Dataset and model transparency protocols

Certification and compliance templates

Court-admissible documentation structures




Canonical Structure & Companion Doctrine

DINSE-X Version-5 is formally anchored by three canonical companion documents, issued as stable Version-1 releases:



Core Doctrine Manifesto — Identity, authority boundaries, and rule-of-law signal

Legal & Judicial Review Brief — Court-centric interpretive and review framework

Executive Sovereign Brief — Policy-safe, democracy-preserving executive guidance


Together, these documents form a closed, non-ambiguous doctrinal bundle.



Significance

DINSE-X Version-5 establishes one of the world’s clearest law-first AI governance doctrines, simultaneously addressing:

✔ AI Safety✔ Post-Quantum Security✔ Constitutional Legitimacy✔ Judicial Supremacy✔ National Sovereignty✔ International Law✔ Ethical Assurance✔ Democratic Accountability✔ Civilizational Continuity

It is expressly designed to prevent technological exceptionalism, autonomous authority claims, and erosion of rule-of-law in AI deployment.



Intended Audience



National Governments

Courts & Judicial Bodies

Defense & Security Agencies

Regulators & Oversight Authorities

International Organizations (UN, NATO, EU)

Academic & Research Institutions

AI Governance & Policy Think-Tanks




Version Notes

DINSE-X Version-5 constitutes a doctrinal and governance maturation over Version-4, introducing:



Explicit law-first canonical doctrine

Judicial supremacy and non-delegation sealing

Companion manifesto and legal briefs

Stronger misuse-prevention architecture

Long-term interpretive stability


Version-4 remains archived as a foundational master edition; Version-5 is the current authoritative release.



Keywords

AI Governance, Sovereign AI, Law-First AI, DINSE-X, AI Security, Post-Quantum Security, Judicial Review, Constitutional Alignment, Ethical AI, Autonomous Systems Governance, AI Safety Frameworks, National AI Policy, International Law, Digital Sovereignty, Cognitive Warfare, Auditability, Civilizational Continuity, Global AI Governance.



Recommended Citation

Mazumdar, B. (2025).DINSE-X Version-5: Law-First Sovereign AI Governance, Security & Civilizational Continuity Framework (Ultimate Strategic & Doctrinal Edition).Zenodo.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17926281



Author

Dr. B. Mazumdar, D.Sc. (Hon.), D.Litt. (Hon.)Independent Researcher–ScholarAI Governance • Cybersecurity • Post-Quantum Cryptography • Digital StatecraftFounder, FAIR+D Canon — India (2025)ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5615-3558