cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr09730.v1
title: National Maternal and Infant Health Survey, 1988
title: Version 1

description: This survey was designed to explore factors that cause negative pregnancy outcomes. Questions were asked of pregnant women concerning prenatal care, weight gain or loss during pregnancy, alcohol, cigarette, or drug use during pregnancy, and whether vitamin or mineral supplements were taken before or during pregnancy. In addition, questions were asked about the use of home pregnancy tests, exercise before and during pregnancy, medical care before, during, and after delivery, previous pregnancies and their outcomes, birth control use, and how the mother felt and behaved. Demographic information about the mother such as marital status, marital history, date of birth, state of birth, mother's weight at birth, weight changes before, during, and after pregnancy, height, race, education, work history, and place of residence was obtained. Information about the father includes items such as age, height, weight, education, and job status. In addition, family income questions were asked, as were questions about the health, care, and feeding of the baby. Information was also taken from birth certificates and fetal and infant death certificates.
description: Stratified, systematic sampling from the 48 states, the District of Columbia, and New York City in 1988. For Part 2, the Texas--Hispanic Sample, all Texans from the national file were combined with an oversample of Texas Hispanics.
description: Datasets: DS1: Public-use National Data File
description: Women between the ages of 15 and 49 who had a pregnancy in 1988.
description: Per agreement with the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), ICPSR distributes the data file(s) and technical documentation in this collection in their original form as prepared by NCHS.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr09730.v2
title: National Maternal and Infant Health Survey, 1988
title: Version 2

description: This survey was designed to explore factors that cause negative pregnancy outcomes. Questions were asked of pregnant women concerning prenatal care, weight gain or loss during pregnancy, alcohol, cigarette, or drug use during pregnancy, and whether vitamin or mineral supplements were taken before or during pregnancy. In addition, questions were asked about the use of home pregnancy tests, exercise before and during pregnancy, medical care before, during, and after delivery, previous pregnancies and their outcomes, birth control use, and how the mother felt and behaved. Demographic information about the mother such as marital status, marital history, date of birth, state of birth, mother's weight at birth, weight changes before, during, and after pregnancy, height, race, education, work history, and place of residence was obtained. Information about the father includes items such as age, height, weight, education, and job status. In addition, family income questions were asked, as were questions about the health, care, and feeding of the baby. Information was also taken from birth certificates and fetal and infant death certificates.
description: Stratified, systematic sampling from the 48 states, the District of Columbia, and New York City in 1988. For Part 2, the Texas--Hispanic Sample, all Texans from the national file were combined with an oversample of Texas Hispanics.
description: Datasets: DS1: Public-use National Data File
description: Women between the ages of 15 and 49 who had a pregnancy in 1988.
description: Per agreement with the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), ICPSR distributes the data file(s) and technical documentation in this collection in their original form as prepared by NCHS.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr23262.v1
title: Child Care Market Rate Survey Project: Telephone Survey of Oregon Facilities, 2006
title: Version 1

description: Starting with the Family Support Act of 1988, requirements for federal funding stipulate that child care subsidy rates be informed by market rates. In 1990 the federal government began a major investment in child care with the passage of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990. Support of parental choice was a key component of this new block grant program that sent new money to states to support child care. Parental choice and state control of policy remained central when the program was expanded in 1996 as a part of welfare reform legislation. At that time, child care funding became known as the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF). States are required by the CCDF Final Rule to ensure that families receiving child care assistance have equal access to comparable care purchased by private-paying parents. A market rate survey (MRS) is a tool States use to achieve this program objective. Some States conduct surveys to collect the child care market rate and others use administrative data, such as data collected by child care resource and referral (CCR&R) and State licensing agencies, to analyze the market rate for child care. This survey was one strategy used to collect child care market price data. Comparing findings garnered from different methods allows one to evaluate whether different data collection methods produce different price findings (convergent validity) and how well these data collection methods represent the child care market (criterion-related validity). These data can also be used to explore several validity issues of concern with market price studies. The major areas of investigation in this survey include child care prices by type of care, geographic location, and price mode (hourly, daily, weekly, monthly). Other areas of investigation include capacity by age group, additional fees facilities charge, whether they care for subsidized children, and what affects the prices that they charge parents.
description: Telephone survey with separate branches for family and center facilities.
description: Sample and population weights are included in the data file. Please consult the Codebook for a more in-depth explanation of the weighting procedure and the specific formulas that were used for each of the weights.
description: Response Rates: 56.9 percent
description: Stratified random sample by geographic region (regions A, B, and C) and by facility type (family child care and center, including large family child care). Data was collected from three different sources: Child Care Division facilities, Department of Human Services facilities, Resource and Referral facilities.
description: Datasets: DS1: Child Care Market Rate Survey Project: Telephone Survey of Oregon Facilities, 2006
description: Facilities that were providing care for any children other than their own, on a regular paying basis.
description: telephone interviewThis dataset was produced by the Social and Economic Sciences Research Center (SESRC) at Washington State University.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr21400.v1
title: Child Care Licensing Study, United States, 2004-2005
title: Version 1

description: The purpose of the 2005 Child Care Licensing Study was to report two aspects of child care licensing from 2005 for all 50 states and the District of Columbia: (1) state child care licensing programs and policies, and (2) child care center licensing regulations.To collect information on states' licensing policies, including staffing, monitoring, and enforcement of licensing regulations, the National Association for Regulatory Administration (NARA) disseminated the 2005 NARA Child Care Licensing Program Survey to all state child care licensing agencies in February 2005. Responses were received from all states. The survey focuses on the processes and policies in each state related to staffing for the licensing program, monitoring facilities, and enforcement of licensing regulations. The data cover the following topic areas: Number of licensed facilities Complaint investigations Licensing staff Enforcement actions Types of inspections Licensing information on the Internet Frequency of inspections Licensing fees Frequency of licensing Licensing staff requirements Inspections and monitoring The role of licensing in quality initiatives Data on child care center licensing regulations were compiled from the regulations posted on the National Resource Center for Health and Safety in Child Care and Early Education Web site (http://nrc.uchsc.edu/STATES/states.htm) between January 1 and December 31, 2005. The data cover the following areas: Licensing regulations Additional staff training requirements Definition of licensed child care centers Child-staff ratios and group size Staff roles and age requirements Supervision of children Staff qualifications and ongoing training requirements Care of children Facility requirements Staff hiring requirements More information on the study is located on the National Association for Regulatory Administration Web site.
description: Response Rates: Responses were received from all states and the District of Columbia.
description: Datasets: DS0: Study-Level Files DS1: State Licensing Programs and Policies Data DS2: State Child Care Center Regulations Data DS3: State Child Care Center Staff Qualifications Data
description: All state child care licensing agencies in the United States. Smallest Geographic Unit: state
description: mail questionnaireThe data in this collection has been organized in a way designed to reflect the existing structure presented in the Child Care Licensing Survey Final Report and on the NARA Web site.Users should note that due to limitations in SAS, Stata, and SPSS, variables containing open-ended/qualitative data (&gt;244 characters) are available in Microsoft Excel format only.Upon conversion from the original Microsoft Access database, some formatting was not retained.No data is available for Idaho. Idaho does not have child care licensing at the state level.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr21402.v1
title: Child Care Market Rate Survey Practices and Policies of States, Territories, and Tribes, 2005-2006
title: Version 1

description: The primary objective of this study was to describe current market rate survey methods, practices, and policies in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, five territories, and the 28 Native American tribes that conduct their own market rate survey. A market rate survey is a tool to collect up-to-date information on what facilities, within given geographic areas, charge parents for various types of child care. A second objective was to identify the validity issues that emerge from this comparison of current market rate survey practices. Variables are organized under six specific functions representing the market rate survey process. These were: (1) administration/organization of the market rate survey, (2) facility population and sample, (3) data collection, (4) data analysis, (5) dissemination of the results, and (6) rate setting policy.
description: Response Rates: Surveys describing each aspect of the market rate survey process were completed by 46 out of 50 states and the District of Columbia for a response rate of 47 out of 51 (92 percent). Two states chose not to participate, and two did not respond after mulitple contacts. One territory completed the survey, and two provided anecdotal information about how they conducted their market rate survey. Two territories did not respond to the survey after multiple contacts. Of the 28 tribes who conducted their own market rate survey, five completed the Phase 2 survey on their market rate survey practices. Tribes typically have small numbers of child care facilities and because of this we believed the survey was not relevant to the tribes who did not respond. Therefore, each of these tribes (23 in total) were called and qualitative data was collected on how they conducted their market rate survey.
description: Datasets: DS0: Study-Level Files DS1: Market Rate Survey Data DS2: Market Rate Survey Open-Ended Responses Data DS3: Market Rate Survey Qualitative Data DS4: Market Rate Survey Merged Data
description: The 50 states and the District of Columbia, five territories, and 28 Native American tribes that indicated they had completed their own market rate survey since 2001.
description: computer-assisted self interview (CASI); self-enumerated questionnaire; web-based surveyUsers should note that, due to limitations in SAS and Stata, the open-ended and qualitative data are available in SPSS and Microsoft Excel formats only.
DOI: 10.24431/rw1k5au
title: Gridded Historical CTD data over the Bering and Chukchi continental shelves

description: This hydrographic dataset is a compilation of conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) profiles from the Bering Sea and Chukchi Sea continental shelves over 1922-2018. Profiles are averaged by depth layer over a 1 degree latitude by 2 degree longitude grid on a monthly basis. Data sources and QA/QC procedures are as documented in Danielson et al. [2020]: Danielson, S.L., O. Ahkinga, C. Ashjian, E. Basyuk, L.W. Cooper, L. Eisner, E. Farley, K.B. Iken, J.M. Grebmeier, L. Juranek, G. Khen, S. Jayne, T. Kikuchi, C. Ladd, K. Lu, R. McCabe, G.W.K. Moore, S. Nishino, S.R. Okkonen, F. Ozenna, R.S. Pickart, I. Polyakov, P.J. Stabeno, K. Wood, W.J. Williams, T.J. Weingartner, 2020. Manifestation and consequences of warming and altered heat fluxes over the Bering and Chukchi Sea continental shelves. Deep-Sea Res. II: Topical Studies in Oceanogr., 177, 144781, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2020.104781 Data Columns: 1. Year 2. Month 3. Grid mid-point latitude 4. Grid mid-point longitude 5. Depth (m) 6. Temperature (degrees C) 7. Salinity (PSU)
DOI: 10.24431/rw1k5av
title: Gridded Historical CTD data over the Bering and Chukchi continental shelves

description: This hydrographic dataset is a compilation of conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) profiles from the Bering Sea and Chukchi Sea continental shelves over 1922-2018. Profiles are averaged by depth layer over a 1 degree latitude by 2 degree longitude grid on a monthly basis. Data sources and QA/QC procedures are as documented in Danielson et al. [2020]: Danielson, S.L., O. Ahkinga, C. Ashjian, E. Basyuk, L.W. Cooper, L. Eisner, E. Farley, K.B. Iken, J.M. Grebmeier, L. Juranek, G. Khen, S. Jayne, T. Kikuchi, C. Ladd, K. Lu, R. McCabe, G.W.K. Moore, S. Nishino, S.R. Okkonen, F. Ozenna, R.S. Pickart, I. Polyakov, P.J. Stabeno, K. Wood, W.J. Williams, T.J. Weingartner, 2020. Manifestation and consequences of warming and altered heat fluxes over the Bering and Chukchi Sea continental shelves. Deep-Sea Res. II: Topical Studies in Oceanogr., 177, 144781, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2020.104781 Data Columns: 1. Year 2. Month 3. Grid mid-point latitude 4. Grid mid-point longitude 5. Depth (m) 6. Temperature (degrees C) 7. Salinity (PSU)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5504354
title: 2019 PH Backup miscellaneous

description: 2019 PH - Backup: - INQ Archive-2003 - Writing documents - Codings - Fieldwork safety, - Data management plan - Logs
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2633560
title: 2019 PH Backup miscellaneous

description: 2019 PH - Backup: - INQ Archive-2003 - Writing documents - Codings - Fieldwork safety, - Data management plan - Logs
DOI: 10.3886/e142821v1
title: Testing Basic Assumptions Reveals When (Not) to Expect Mindset and Belonging Interventions to Succeed

description: In this case study, we investigated the effectiveness of growth mindset and social belonging interventions in a college setting with large numbers of traditionally underrepresented groups (n = 1,091). In doing so, we highlight the characteristics of the students in our study that are important for determining whether we should expect such interventions to be effective for diverse higher education populations. Correlational analyses revealed no evidence that growth mindset or social belonging were barriers to academic success among targeted subgroups in our sample. Additionally, we found no evidence that underrepresented minority, first-generation, or low-income students substantially endorsed fixed mindset or belonging uncertainty measures at baseline. We discuss benefits of testing basic assumptions for interpreting null results, including choosing the most appropriate interventions, accurately identifying subgroups who face psychological barriers to academic success, and establishing “redundancy thresholds” at which messages do not need to be reinforced by interventions.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4587271
title: 2019PH-InterviewTranscription Backup

description: 2019PH-InterviewTranscription Backup - from Macbook
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3778257
title: 2019PH-InterviewTranscription Backup

description: 2019PH-InterviewTranscription Backup - from Macbook
DOI: 10.24431/rw1k5aw
title: Benthic Macrofaunal Respirometry, Arctic Integrated Ecosystem Research Program, 2017

description: These data are part of the ASGARD component of the Arctic Integrated Ecosystem Research Program (IERP), sponsored by the North Pacific Research Board (NPRB), Collaborative Alaskan Arctic Studies Program (formerly the North Slope Borough/Shell Baseline Studies Program), Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), and the Office of Naval Research Marine Mammals and Biology Program. The data file contains meiofauna abundance from samples collected in 2017.
DOI: 10.24431/rw1k5ax
title: Benthic Macrofaunal Respirometry, Arctic Integrated Ecosystem Research Program, 2018

description: These data are part of the ASGARD component of the Arctic Integrated Ecosystem Research Program (IERP), sponsored by the North Pacific Research Board (NPRB), Collaborative Alaskan Arctic Studies Program (formerly the North Slope Borough/Shell Baseline Studies Program), Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), and the Office of Naval Research Marine Mammals and Biology Program. The data files contain meiofauna abundance from samples collected in 2018.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5504392
title: 2019 PH Logs backup

description: 2019 PH Logs backup
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2648571
title: 2019 PH Logs backup

description: 2019 PH Logs backup
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.16613839
title: Prospective real-world study on association of clinical characteristics of SLE with flare

description: Prospective study conducted at First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University between September 2018 to July 2020. Time to SLE flare, potential factors affecting time to flare, predictors of flare and indicators related to flare were explored.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.16613839.v1
title: Prospective real-world study on association of clinical characteristics of SLE with flare

description: Prospective study conducted at First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University between September 2018 to July 2020. Time to SLE flare, potential factors affecting time to flare, predictors of flare and indicators related to flare were explored.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.16613869
title: Pathways to Environmental Activism in Four Countries

description: Young adults in USA, UK, France, and Canada
DOI: 10.5519/qd.ylseudo0
title: Query on the Natural History Museum Data Portal (data.nhm.ac.uk) (214 records)
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287l48
title: CCDC 2092659: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287l59
title: CCDC 2092660: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287l6b
title: CCDC 2092661: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287lbg
title: CCDC 2092665: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287lch
title: CCDC 2092666: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287ldj
title: CCDC 2092667: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287lfk
title: CCDC 2092668: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287lgl
title: CCDC 2092669: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287lhm
title: CCDC 2092670: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287ljn
title: CCDC 2092671: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287lkp
title: CCDC 2092672: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287llq
title: CCDC 2092673: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287zbv
title: CCDC 2093037: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287zcw
title: CCDC 2093038: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287zdx
title: CCDC 2093039: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287zfy
title: CCDC 2093040: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287zgz
title: CCDC 2093041: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287zh0
title: CCDC 2093042: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287zj1
title: CCDC 2093043: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287zk2
title: CCDC 2093044: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287zl3
title: CCDC 2093045: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287zm4
title: CCDC 2093046: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Andrew J. Peloquin, Colin D. McMillen, William T. Pennington|2021|CrystEngComm|23|6098|doi:10.1039/D1CE00864A