cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15159382
title: Table 2 in Comparative anatomy of tbe vocal apparatus in bats and implications for tbe diversity of laryngeal ecbolocation

description: Table 2. Distribution of anatomical features in the different bat clades.
CladeCricoid Arch ShapeMuscular WingsMedian CrestCricoid Ventral DevelopmentTracheal ChambersŊyroid Laminae ShapeArytenoid CartilageHyoid ApparatusStyohyoid ShapeMuscle HypertrophyNon-bats and PteropodidaeRounded--/ +--UAverageAverageDrumstick-RhinolophoideaRHNarrowed— Oval++++++-++Rounded VDeveloped muscular processReinforced basihyalPaddle++ (CAD/ CAL)MCRNarrowed— Oval++++++-Rounded VDeveloped muscular processReinforced basihyalPaddle++ (CAD/ CAL)YangochiropteraEmballonuridaeNarrowed— Oval+++++-Strict V + cranial tubercleDeveloped vocal processShorten thyrohyalsElongated and curved paddle++ (CT)PhyllostomidaeNarrowed— Triangle+++-/++-Strict V + cranial tubercleDeveloped vocal processShorten thyrohyalsElongated and curved paddle++ (CT)Pteronotus sp.Narrowed— Triangle++++++++ (flared rim)-Strict V + cranial tubercleDeveloped vocal processReinforced basihyalElongated and curved paddle++ (CT)OthersNarrowed— Triangle++++-/++-Strict V + cranial tubercleDeveloped vocal processShorten thyrohyalsElongated and curved paddle++ (CT)
CAD, cricoarytenoid dorsalis muscle; CAL, cricoarytenoid lateralis muscle; CT, cricothyroid muscle; MCR, Megadermatidae, Craseonycteridae and Rhinopomatidae group; RH, Rhinolophidae and Hipposideridae group;-, absent;+, reduced; ++, present; +++, extremely developed; -/++, absent in some species and present in others.
description: Published as part of Brualla, Nicolas LM, Wilson, Laura AB, Tu, Vuong Tan, Nojiri, Taro, Carter, Richard T, Ngamprasertwong, Thngchai, Wannaprasert, Thanakul, Doube, Michael, Fukui, Dai & Koyabu, Daisuke, 2024, Comparative anatomy of tbe vocal apparatus in bats and implications for tbe diversity of laryngeal ecbolocation, pp. 13 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 202 (3) on page 13, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad180, http://zenodo.org/record/14422571
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15159381
title: Table 2 in Comparative anatomy of tbe vocal apparatus in bats and implications for tbe diversity of laryngeal ecbolocation

description: Table 2. Distribution of anatomical features in the different bat clades.
CladeCricoid Arch ShapeMuscular WingsMedian CrestCricoid Ventral DevelopmentTracheal ChambersŊyroid Laminae ShapeArytenoid CartilageHyoid ApparatusStyohyoid ShapeMuscle HypertrophyNon-bats and PteropodidaeRounded--/ +--UAverageAverageDrumstick-RhinolophoideaRHNarrowed— Oval++++++-++Rounded VDeveloped muscular processReinforced basihyalPaddle++ (CAD/ CAL)MCRNarrowed— Oval++++++-Rounded VDeveloped muscular processReinforced basihyalPaddle++ (CAD/ CAL)YangochiropteraEmballonuridaeNarrowed— Oval+++++-Strict V + cranial tubercleDeveloped vocal processShorten thyrohyalsElongated and curved paddle++ (CT)PhyllostomidaeNarrowed— Triangle+++-/++-Strict V + cranial tubercleDeveloped vocal processShorten thyrohyalsElongated and curved paddle++ (CT)Pteronotus sp.Narrowed— Triangle++++++++ (flared rim)-Strict V + cranial tubercleDeveloped vocal processReinforced basihyalElongated and curved paddle++ (CT)OthersNarrowed— Triangle++++-/++-Strict V + cranial tubercleDeveloped vocal processShorten thyrohyalsElongated and curved paddle++ (CT)
CAD, cricoarytenoid dorsalis muscle; CAL, cricoarytenoid lateralis muscle; CT, cricothyroid muscle; MCR, Megadermatidae, Craseonycteridae and Rhinopomatidae group; RH, Rhinolophidae and Hipposideridae group;-, absent;+, reduced; ++, present; +++, extremely developed; -/++, absent in some species and present in others.
description: Published as part of Brualla, Nicolas LM, Wilson, Laura AB, Tu, Vuong Tan, Nojiri, Taro, Carter, Richard T, Ngamprasertwong, Thngchai, Wannaprasert, Thanakul, Doube, Michael, Fukui, Dai & Koyabu, Daisuke, 2024, Comparative anatomy of tbe vocal apparatus in bats and implications for tbe diversity of laryngeal ecbolocation, pp. 13 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 202 (3) on page 13, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad180, http://zenodo.org/record/14422571
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15159376
title: Table 2. Isoplectron Hutton, 1896 in Revision of the New Zealand cave wētā genus Isoplectron Hutton (Orthoptera: Rhaphidophoridae), with synonymy of Petrotettix Richards and Setascutum Richards, and the description of a new genus

description: Table 2. Isoplectron Hutton, 1896 and Praecantrix gen. nov. Summary of Bayesian model results for length of insect body and of hind tibia as a function of sex, geographical coordinates (easting, northing in New Zealand Geodetic Datum 2000 map grid) and elevation (m a.s.l.). All models run in JASP ver. 0.17.1. Species for which sample size is too small for statistics are omitted. CI stands for credible intervals; for covariates these are only reported where they are significant.
SpeciesMeasurements (mm)Sample size 1Bayesian Linear Mixed Model Fixed factor: Sex Random factor: LocationBayesian Linear Regression Factor: Sex Covariates: Easting, Northing, ElevationIsoplectron armatum armatum Hutton, 1896Body46No sexual dimorphism 95% CI: - 0.34–0.93 mmNo effect of covariatesHind tibia46+ 2.5mm in ♂ 95% CI: 1.59–3.20 mmNo effect of covariatesIsoplectron armatum aciculatum Karny, 1937Body13No sexual dimorphism 95% CI: -1.09– 0.99 mmNo effect of covariatesHind tibia13+ 3.2mm in ♂ 95% CI: 1.01–5.35 mmNo effect of covariatesIsoplectron pallidum Richards, 1972Body23No sexual dimorphism 95% CI: -1.54– 1.40 mm+ 0.13 mm per 100 m elevation 95% CI: 0.00 mm– 0.60 mm+ 0.99mm per 100 km south 95% CI: 0.00 mm– 2.96 mmHind tibia23+ 1.2 mm in ♂ 95% CI: - 0.01–2.35 mm+ 0.15 mm per 100 m elevation 95% CI: 0.00 mm– 0.60mmIsoplectron serratum Richards, 1972Body27+ 1.2 mm in ♀ 95% CI: 0.1–2.37 mmNo effect of covariatesHind tibia27+ 3.7 mm in ♂ 95% CI: 1.84–5.89 mmNo effect of covariatesIsoplectron ferratum sp. nov.Body18No sexual dimorphism 95% CI: - 1.1–2.06 mmNo effect of covariatesHind tibia18No sexual dimorphism 95% CI: - 0.27–1.23 mmNo effect of covariatesPraecantrix silvatica gen. et sp. nov.Body23+ 1.2 mm in ♀ 95% CI: 0.3–1.97 mmNo effect of covariatesHind tibia23+ 0.8 mm in ♀ 95% CI: 0.12–1.43 mmNo effect of covariatesPraecantrix saxicola gen. et sp. nov.Body10+ 2.8 mm in ♀ 95% CI: 1.56–4.09 mmSample size too smallHind tibia10+ 1.8 mm in ♀ 95% CI: 0.06–3.42 mmSample size too small
1 For the number of males and females in each sample, refer to Table 1.
description: Published as part of Hegg, Danilo, Morgan-Richards, Mary & Trewick, Steven A., 2024, Revision of the New Zealand cave wētā genus Isoplectron Hutton (Orthoptera: Rhaphidophoridae), with synonymy of Petrotettix Richards and Setascutum Richards, and the description of a new genus, pp. 21 in European Journal of Taxonomy 971 on page 21, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2024.971.2761, http://zenodo.org/record/14451786
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15159387
title: Table 1 in An updated subjective global checklist of the extant non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea)

description: Table 1. Summary of taxonomic acts proposed in this study: Change of ranks, new combinations, new taxonomic placements, new names, and new synonymies.
Change of rank1.Subfamily Cabralcandoninae Külköylüoğlu et al., 2019 (change of rank)2.Subfamily Candoninae Kaufmann, 1900 (new status)3.Subfamily Candonopsinae Karanovic, 2004 (change of rank)4.Subfamily Cryptocandoninae Karanovic, 2007 (change of rank)5.Subfamily Humphreyscandoninae Karanovic, 2005 (change of rank)6.Subfamily Namibcypridinae Martens, 1992 (change of rank)7.Subfamily Terrestricypridinae Schornikov, 1980 (change of rank)8.Subfamily Trapezicandoninae Karanovic, 2007 (change of rank)9.Subfamily Thalassocypridinae Hartmann & Puri, 1974 (reverted status)10.Subfamily Renaudcypridinae McKenzie, 1980 (reverted status)New combinations1.Candelacypris ungulata (Moniez, 1891) comb. nov. Cypris ungulata Moniez, 18912.Fabaeformiscandona elegans (Bronstein, 1928) comb. nov. Candona elegans Bronstein, 19283.Fabaeformiscandona elpatiewskyi (Daday, 1906) comb. nov. Eucandona elpatiewskyi Daday, 19064.Neglecandona iliensis (Mandelstam, 1962) comb. nov. Candona iliensis Mandelstam, 19625.Sarscypridopsis kurilensis (Schornikov, 1974) comb. nov. Cypridopsis kurilensis Schornikov, 19746.Schellencandona mira (Sywula, 1976) comb. nov. Candona (Typhlocypris) mira Sywula, 1976New taxonomic placement1.Prionocandona kantii Gupta, 1989 Moved from Herpetocyprellinae to Cypricercinae: BradleystrandesiiniNew name1.Chlamydotheca deformis paracolombiensis nom. nov. Junior homonym: Chlamydotheca deformis colombiensis Roessler, 1986New synonymies1.Candelacypris ungulata (Moniez, 1891) comb. nov. Eucypris aragonica Brehm & Margalef, 1949 syn. nov.2.Candona intermedia Bronstein, 1947 Candona maloemorensis Meisch, Smith & Martens, 2019 syn. nov.3.Cypridopsis vidua (O.F. Müller, 1776) Cypridopsis okeechobei Furtos, 1936 syn. nov.4.Heterocypris incongruens (Ramdohr, 1808) Cypris incongruens var. balatonica Daday, 1894 syn. nov.5.Potamocypris arcuata (Sars, 1903) Potamocypris almasyi var. angulata Bronstein, 1927 syn. nov.
description: Published as part of Meisch, Claude, Smith, Robin J. & Martens, Koen, 2024, An updated subjective global checklist of the extant non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea), pp. 4 in European Journal of Taxonomy 974 on page 4, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2024.974.2767, http://zenodo.org/record/14500383
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15159388
title: Table 1 in An updated subjective global checklist of the extant non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea)

description: Table 1. Summary of taxonomic acts proposed in this study: Change of ranks, new combinations, new taxonomic placements, new names, and new synonymies.
Change of rank1.Subfamily Cabralcandoninae Külköylüoğlu et al., 2019 (change of rank)2.Subfamily Candoninae Kaufmann, 1900 (new status)3.Subfamily Candonopsinae Karanovic, 2004 (change of rank)4.Subfamily Cryptocandoninae Karanovic, 2007 (change of rank)5.Subfamily Humphreyscandoninae Karanovic, 2005 (change of rank)6.Subfamily Namibcypridinae Martens, 1992 (change of rank)7.Subfamily Terrestricypridinae Schornikov, 1980 (change of rank)8.Subfamily Trapezicandoninae Karanovic, 2007 (change of rank)9.Subfamily Thalassocypridinae Hartmann & Puri, 1974 (reverted status)10.Subfamily Renaudcypridinae McKenzie, 1980 (reverted status)New combinations1.Candelacypris ungulata (Moniez, 1891) comb. nov. Cypris ungulata Moniez, 18912.Fabaeformiscandona elegans (Bronstein, 1928) comb. nov. Candona elegans Bronstein, 19283.Fabaeformiscandona elpatiewskyi (Daday, 1906) comb. nov. Eucandona elpatiewskyi Daday, 19064.Neglecandona iliensis (Mandelstam, 1962) comb. nov. Candona iliensis Mandelstam, 19625.Sarscypridopsis kurilensis (Schornikov, 1974) comb. nov. Cypridopsis kurilensis Schornikov, 19746.Schellencandona mira (Sywula, 1976) comb. nov. Candona (Typhlocypris) mira Sywula, 1976New taxonomic placement1.Prionocandona kantii Gupta, 1989 Moved from Herpetocyprellinae to Cypricercinae: BradleystrandesiiniNew name1.Chlamydotheca deformis paracolombiensis nom. nov. Junior homonym: Chlamydotheca deformis colombiensis Roessler, 1986New synonymies1.Candelacypris ungulata (Moniez, 1891) comb. nov. Eucypris aragonica Brehm & Margalef, 1949 syn. nov.2.Candona intermedia Bronstein, 1947 Candona maloemorensis Meisch, Smith & Martens, 2019 syn. nov.3.Cypridopsis vidua (O.F. Müller, 1776) Cypridopsis okeechobei Furtos, 1936 syn. nov.4.Heterocypris incongruens (Ramdohr, 1808) Cypris incongruens var. balatonica Daday, 1894 syn. nov.5.Potamocypris arcuata (Sars, 1903) Potamocypris almasyi var. angulata Bronstein, 1927 syn. nov.
description: Published as part of Meisch, Claude, Smith, Robin J. & Martens, Koen, 2024, An updated subjective global checklist of the extant non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea), pp. 4 in European Journal of Taxonomy 974 on page 4, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2024.974.2767, http://zenodo.org/record/14500383
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15159390
title: Table 2 in An updated subjective global checklist of the extant non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea)

description: Table 2. Numbers of genera and species in each superfamily and family, ordered from most to least speciose (superfamilies, then families). * indicates primarily marine families with non-marine representatives.
SuperfamiliesNumber of species%FamiliesNumber of genera%Number of species%Cypridoidea183675.9Cyprididae12141.0105543.6Candonidae5318.051921.5Cyclocyprididae124.11365.6Ilyocyprididae20.7451.9Paracyprididae82.7421.7Notodromadidae93.1391.6Cytheroidea54322.4Entocytheridae3511.92118.7Limnocytheridae227.51737.1Cytherideidae *93.1964.0Leptocytheridae *20.7231.0Cytheridae *20.7130.5Loxoconchidae *51.7120.5Xestoleberididae *10.350.2Cytheruridae *20.730.1Paradoxostomatidae10.320.1Hemicytheridae *10.320.1Kliellidae20.720.1Cytheromatidae *10.310.04Darwinuloidea371.5Darwinulidae62.0371.5Terrestricytheroidea40.2Terrestricytheridae10.340.2Totals2420100202951002420100
description: Published as part of Meisch, Claude, Smith, Robin J. & Martens, Koen, 2024, An updated subjective global checklist of the extant non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea), pp. 5 in European Journal of Taxonomy 974 on page 5, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2024.974.2767, http://zenodo.org/record/14500383
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15159389
title: Table 2 in An updated subjective global checklist of the extant non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea)

description: Table 2. Numbers of genera and species in each superfamily and family, ordered from most to least speciose (superfamilies, then families). * indicates primarily marine families with non-marine representatives.
SuperfamiliesNumber of species%FamiliesNumber of genera%Number of species%Cypridoidea183675.9Cyprididae12141.0105543.6Candonidae5318.051921.5Cyclocyprididae124.11365.6Ilyocyprididae20.7451.9Paracyprididae82.7421.7Notodromadidae93.1391.6Cytheroidea54322.4Entocytheridae3511.92118.7Limnocytheridae227.51737.1Cytherideidae *93.1964.0Leptocytheridae *20.7231.0Cytheridae *20.7130.5Loxoconchidae *51.7120.5Xestoleberididae *10.350.2Cytheruridae *20.730.1Paradoxostomatidae10.320.1Hemicytheridae *10.320.1Kliellidae20.720.1Cytheromatidae *10.310.04Darwinuloidea371.5Darwinulidae62.0371.5Terrestricytheroidea40.2Terrestricytheridae10.340.2Totals2420100202951002420100
description: Published as part of Meisch, Claude, Smith, Robin J. & Martens, Koen, 2024, An updated subjective global checklist of the extant non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea), pp. 5 in European Journal of Taxonomy 974 on page 5, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2024.974.2767, http://zenodo.org/record/14500383
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15159395
title: Table 1 in Adaptive tails? Parallel evolution of expanded tails in monsoonal tropics lineages of an Australian gecko radiation (Oedura)

description: Table 1. Species included in this study, with their geographical distribution, and details of ecology. Habitat refers to whether the species only occurs among rocks (saxicoline) or widely into non-rocky areas (generalist); region refers to broad environmental region of Australia, specifically Australian Monsoonal Tropics (AMT), Australian Arid Zone (AAZ), and Eastern Subtropics (EST). The number of specimens examined is denoted by N.
Species/PopulationDistributionHabitatRegionNSpecies DescriptionOedura bellaparts of NT, NW QLDSaxicolineAMT5Oliver and Doughty 2016Oedura castelnauiFar north QLDGeneralistAMT4Thominot 1889Oedura cincta (eastern)central eastern to central south AUSGeneralistAAZ8De Vis 1888Oedura cincta (central)MacDonnell Ranges, NTSaxicolineAAZ5De Vis 1888Oedura coggeriNE QLDSaxicolineAMT6Bustard 1966Oedura elegansSE QLD and NE NSWGeneralistEST1Hoskin 2019Oedura filicipodaNW WA (Kimberley)SaxicolineAMT2King 1984Oedura fimbriaPilbara Region/areas of Central WASaxicolineAAZ5Oliver and Doughty 2016Oedura gemmataKakadu-Arnhem Land, NTSaxicolineAMT6King and Gow 1983Oedura gracilisKimberley Region, WASaxicolineAMT7King 1984Oedura luritjaMacDonnell Ranges, NTSaxicolineAAZ3Oliver and McDonald 2016Oedura marmorataKakadu-Arnhem Land, NTSaxicolineAMT7Gray 1842Oedura marmorata (Darwin)Darwin region, NTSaxicolineAMT6Gray 1842Oedura marmorata (Pine Creek)Pine Creek, Katherine Region, NTSaxicolineAMT4Gray 1842Oedura marmorata (Katherine)Katherine region, NTSaxicolineAMT9Gray 1842Oedura moniliscentral E QLDGeneralistEST1De Vis 1888Oedura murrumanuKimberley Region, WASaxicolineAAZ1Oliver et al. 2014aOedura nesosGroote Eylandt, NTSaxicolineAMT3Oliver et al. 2020Oedura tryoniSE QLD and NE NSWGeneralistEST5De Vis 1884
description: Published as part of Green, Amy L., Oliver, Paul M., Gray, Jaimi A. & Sherraư, Emma, 2024, Adaptive tails? Parallel evolution of expanded tails in monsoonal tropics lineages of an Australian gecko radiation (Oedura), pp. 4 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 202 (2) on page 4, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad186, http://zenodo.org/record/14422774
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15159396
title: Table 1 in Adaptive tails? Parallel evolution of expanded tails in monsoonal tropics lineages of an Australian gecko radiation (Oedura)

description: Table 1. Species included in this study, with their geographical distribution, and details of ecology. Habitat refers to whether the species only occurs among rocks (saxicoline) or widely into non-rocky areas (generalist); region refers to broad environmental region of Australia, specifically Australian Monsoonal Tropics (AMT), Australian Arid Zone (AAZ), and Eastern Subtropics (EST). The number of specimens examined is denoted by N.
Species/PopulationDistributionHabitatRegionNSpecies DescriptionOedura bellaparts of NT, NW QLDSaxicolineAMT5Oliver and Doughty 2016Oedura castelnauiFar north QLDGeneralistAMT4Thominot 1889Oedura cincta (eastern)central eastern to central south AUSGeneralistAAZ8De Vis 1888Oedura cincta (central)MacDonnell Ranges, NTSaxicolineAAZ5De Vis 1888Oedura coggeriNE QLDSaxicolineAMT6Bustard 1966Oedura elegansSE QLD and NE NSWGeneralistEST1Hoskin 2019Oedura filicipodaNW WA (Kimberley)SaxicolineAMT2King 1984Oedura fimbriaPilbara Region/areas of Central WASaxicolineAAZ5Oliver and Doughty 2016Oedura gemmataKakadu-Arnhem Land, NTSaxicolineAMT6King and Gow 1983Oedura gracilisKimberley Region, WASaxicolineAMT7King 1984Oedura luritjaMacDonnell Ranges, NTSaxicolineAAZ3Oliver and McDonald 2016Oedura marmorataKakadu-Arnhem Land, NTSaxicolineAMT7Gray 1842Oedura marmorata (Darwin)Darwin region, NTSaxicolineAMT6Gray 1842Oedura marmorata (Pine Creek)Pine Creek, Katherine Region, NTSaxicolineAMT4Gray 1842Oedura marmorata (Katherine)Katherine region, NTSaxicolineAMT9Gray 1842Oedura moniliscentral E QLDGeneralistEST1De Vis 1888Oedura murrumanuKimberley Region, WASaxicolineAAZ1Oliver et al. 2014aOedura nesosGroote Eylandt, NTSaxicolineAMT3Oliver et al. 2020Oedura tryoniSE QLD and NE NSWGeneralistEST5De Vis 1884
description: Published as part of Green, Amy L., Oliver, Paul M., Gray, Jaimi A. & Sherraư, Emma, 2024, Adaptive tails? Parallel evolution of expanded tails in monsoonal tropics lineages of an Australian gecko radiation (Oedura), pp. 4 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 202 (2) on page 4, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad186, http://zenodo.org/record/14422774
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15159399
title: Table 2 in Adaptive tails? Parallel evolution of expanded tails in monsoonal tropics lineages of an Australian gecko radiation (Oedura)

description: Table 2. Summary of results for the phylogenetic generalised least squares (PGLS) analysis to test whether ecology predicts (A) tail shape and (B) tail surface area to volume ratio (SA: V). Ecological independent variables are annual precipitation (Bio12) and temperature seasonality (Bio04). Degrees of freedom (d.f.), coefficient of determination (R 2), test statistic (F), effect size (Z) and P -value based upon the F statistic (Pr) for each factor are provided. Models evaluated with type III sums of squares.
(A) shaped.f.R 2FZPr(>F)Precipitation10.0370.6980.1100.448Seasonality10.0010.026-3.1631.000Residuals160.837Total18(B) SA: Vd.f.R 2FZPr(>F)Precipitation10.0110.171–0.4440.667Seasonality10.0140.233–0.3060.636Residuals160.986Total18
description: Published as part of Green, Amy L., Oliver, Paul M., Gray, Jaimi A. & Sherraư, Emma, 2024, Adaptive tails? Parallel evolution of expanded tails in monsoonal tropics lineages of an Australian gecko radiation (Oedura), pp. 10 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 202 (2) on page 10, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad186, http://zenodo.org/record/14422774
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15159400
title: Table 2 in Adaptive tails? Parallel evolution of expanded tails in monsoonal tropics lineages of an Australian gecko radiation (Oedura)

description: Table 2. Summary of results for the phylogenetic generalised least squares (PGLS) analysis to test whether ecology predicts (A) tail shape and (B) tail surface area to volume ratio (SA: V). Ecological independent variables are annual precipitation (Bio12) and temperature seasonality (Bio04). Degrees of freedom (d.f.), coefficient of determination (R 2), test statistic (F), effect size (Z) and P -value based upon the F statistic (Pr) for each factor are provided. Models evaluated with type III sums of squares.
(A) shaped.f.R 2FZPr(>F)Precipitation10.0370.6980.1100.448Seasonality10.0010.026-3.1631.000Residuals160.837Total18(B) SA: Vd.f.R 2FZPr(>F)Precipitation10.0110.171–0.4440.667Seasonality10.0140.233–0.3060.636Residuals160.986Total18
description: Published as part of Green, Amy L., Oliver, Paul M., Gray, Jaimi A. & Sherraư, Emma, 2024, Adaptive tails? Parallel evolution of expanded tails in monsoonal tropics lineages of an Australian gecko radiation (Oedura), pp. 10 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 202 (2) on page 10, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad186, http://zenodo.org/record/14422774
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15159403
title: Table 1 in Description of Neblinichthys peniculatus, a new species of loricariid catfish from the río Paragua drainage of Venezuela

description: Table 1. Morphometric features of the heads as percentage of HL for Neblinichthys brevibracchium (N = 23, except SL, N = 29), N. echinasus (N = 3), N. pilosus (N = 6), N. roraima (N = 4), and N. yaravi (N = 8, except anal-fin spine L. and interorbital W., N = 7). Landmarks are the numbered landmarks in Armbruster (2003). Some N. roraima have completely adnate barbels, giving a measurement of zero. Revised from Taphorn et al. (2010) where these measurements were inadvertently published as ratios of predorsal length.
LandmarksFeatureN. brevibracchiumN. echinasusN. pilosusFeatureN. roraimaN. yaraviRangeAvg. ± SDRangeAvg. ± SDRangeAvg. ± SDRangeAvg. ± SDRangeAvg. ± SD5-7Head-eye L.34.0-40.736.4±1.433.0-38.636.2±2.938.0-42.339.4±1.6Head-eye L.34.2-41.939.7±3.733.7-38.637.1±1.54-5Orbit Dia.14.3-17.215.8±0.814.9-19.317.8±2.515.3-17.916.9±1.0Orbit Dia.14.4-17.216.2±1.215.8-18.517.4±0.91-4Snout L.52.6-62.859.3±2.560.2-63.361.6±1.660.4-66.563.4±2.6Snout L.54.9-61.958.5±2.955.1-64.759.3±3.02-3Internares W.6.5-11.48.2±1.08.1-9.18.6±0.517.3-20.118.7±1.0Internares W.12.3-15.013.8±1.29.3-11.810.4±0.95-6Interorbital W.47.8-54.550.9±1.752.5-55.754.2±1.6--Interorbital W.--48.0-56.252.8±2.77-12Head Dp.54.5-83.961.9±4.956.5-59.658.4±1.763.9-68.766.8±1.8Head Dp.61.3-63.462.5±0.961.2-66.863.3±1.71-24Mouth L.47.8-61.753.8±3.356.8-57.857.4±0.548.2-61.554.5±4.8Mouth L.49.6-64.054.9±6.351.4-61.354.3±3.521-22Mouth W.45.2-55.150.4±2.653.2-56.254.6±1.554.3-63.659.5±3.7Mouth W.53.7-66.062.0±5.854.3-64.060.5±3.422-23Barbel L.1.1-4.43.0±0.91.9-2.92.3±0.55.3-10.17.6±1.7Barbel L.0.0-4.31.8±2.21.7-3.62.7±0.625-26Dentary tooth cup L.10.9-17.514.7±1.411.4-16.413.5±2.717.8-22.019.4±1.6Dentary tooth cup L.17.5-25.320.4±3.416.7-19.317.6±0.927-28Premaxillary tooth cup L.10.9-16.713.6±1.410.7-13.612.5±1.616.1-18.917.3±1.0Premaxillary tooth cup L.19.4-24.621.0±2.414.9-20.116.5±1.7
description: Published as part of Armbruster, Jonathan W. & Taphorn, Donald C., 2013, Description of Neblinichthys peniculatus, a new species of loricariid catfish from the río Paragua drainage of Venezuela, pp. 66 in Neotropical Ichthyology 11 (1) on page 66, DOI: 10.1590/S1679-62252013000100007, http://zenodo.org/record/12652838