cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.17632/mwt5dt3mrg
title: Precise Computation(Ω¹⁰) of the Physical Constants Origin (Fine-Tuning Problem) from the Universal Integral (QIS₀) via the Hamzah Equation.

description: Conceptual and Historical Introduction
1. The Enduring Crisis in Fundamental Physics
Since the dawn of the twentieth century, four fundamental constants of physics – Planck’s constant hhh, the speed of light ccc, Newton’s gravitational constant GGG, and the fine-structure constant α\alphaα – have been accepted as axiomatic givens. Their values were established purely through experiment, without any theoretical derivation or explanatory origin. This has given rise to the notorious Fine-Tuning Problem: if the slightest deviation were introduced into any of these constants, the Universe as we know it – with stars, chemistry, biological life, and consciousness – would never have emerged.

The dilemma has preoccupied generations of scientists. Why is it so? Why has nature “chosen” precisely these values? Are they random accidents, or do they arise from a deeper, universal principle?

2. A New Framework: The Universal Integral (QIS₀)
Our response to this profound puzzle begins with the introduction of the Universal Integral (QIS₀). Defined over the entirety of the space–time–information domain Ω\OmegaΩ, it is expressed as:

QIS0=∫Ω(E+I−S) dμQIS₀ = \int_{\Omega} (E + I - S)\, d\muQIS0=∫Ω(E+I−S)dμ

where:

EEE: Energy,

III: Information,

SSS: Entropy,

dμd\mudμ: the measure over the global space–time–information manifold.

The essential insight is that QIS₀ functions as a cosmic source code. All fundamental constants are, in fact, fractional–fractal derivatives of this integral:

Constant=Dα⋆QIS0\text{Constant} = D^{\alpha^\star} QIS₀Constant=Dα⋆QIS0

In other words, each constant is generated by applying a fractional derivative of order α⋆\alpha^\starα⋆ to QIS₀. These parameters α⋆\alpha^\starα⋆ are calculated for different constants and ultimately converge to a unique, universal optimum value αuniverse\alpha_{\text{universe}}αuniverse.

3. Foundational Tests (1–10)
To examine this idea, ten primary questions were posed and resolved:

Origin of α\alphaα: The celebrated 1/1371/1371/137 arises from a fractal convergence.

Dual nature of gravitation: Gravity is not fundamental but emergent from informational flows across the network.

Matter–antimatter asymmetry: Caused by fractional-symmetry breaking in derivative structures.

Fractal dimensionality of the Universe: At small scales, D≠4D \neq 4D=4; at macroscopic scales, D→4D \to 4D→4.

Nature of dark energy: An emergent repulsive force generated by network energy.

Nature of black holes: Singularities of information, loci of infinite complexity.
DOI: 10.17632/mwt5dt3mrg.1
title: Precise Computation(Ω¹⁰) of the Physical Constants Origin (Fine-Tuning Problem) from the Universal Integral (QIS₀) via the Hamzah Equation.

description: Conceptual and Historical Introduction
1. The Enduring Crisis in Fundamental Physics
Since the dawn of the twentieth century, four fundamental constants of physics – Planck’s constant hhh, the speed of light ccc, Newton’s gravitational constant GGG, and the fine-structure constant α\alphaα – have been accepted as axiomatic givens. Their values were established purely through experiment, without any theoretical derivation or explanatory origin. This has given rise to the notorious Fine-Tuning Problem: if the slightest deviation were introduced into any of these constants, the Universe as we know it – with stars, chemistry, biological life, and consciousness – would never have emerged.

The dilemma has preoccupied generations of scientists. Why is it so? Why has nature “chosen” precisely these values? Are they random accidents, or do they arise from a deeper, universal principle?

2. A New Framework: The Universal Integral (QIS₀)
Our response to this profound puzzle begins with the introduction of the Universal Integral (QIS₀). Defined over the entirety of the space–time–information domain Ω\OmegaΩ, it is expressed as:

QIS0=∫Ω(E+I−S) dμQIS₀ = \int_{\Omega} (E + I - S)\, d\muQIS0=∫Ω(E+I−S)dμ

where:

EEE: Energy,

III: Information,

SSS: Entropy,

dμd\mudμ: the measure over the global space–time–information manifold.

The essential insight is that QIS₀ functions as a cosmic source code. All fundamental constants are, in fact, fractional–fractal derivatives of this integral:

Constant=Dα⋆QIS0\text{Constant} = D^{\alpha^\star} QIS₀Constant=Dα⋆QIS0

In other words, each constant is generated by applying a fractional derivative of order α⋆\alpha^\starα⋆ to QIS₀. These parameters α⋆\alpha^\starα⋆ are calculated for different constants and ultimately converge to a unique, universal optimum value αuniverse\alpha_{\text{universe}}αuniverse.

3. Foundational Tests (1–10)
To examine this idea, ten primary questions were posed and resolved:

Origin of α\alphaα: The celebrated 1/1371/1371/137 arises from a fractal convergence.

Dual nature of gravitation: Gravity is not fundamental but emergent from informational flows across the network.

Matter–antimatter asymmetry: Caused by fractional-symmetry breaking in derivative structures.

Fractal dimensionality of the Universe: At small scales, D≠4D \neq 4D=4; at macroscopic scales, D→4D \to 4D→4.

Nature of dark energy: An emergent repulsive force generated by network energy.

Nature of black holes: Singularities of information, loci of infinite complexity.
DOI: 10.17632/5xs6yt4wsw
title: Experimental Verification of the Hamzah Certainty Principle and Violation of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.(Advanced Laboratory Protocol)

description: Throughout the history of science, Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle has stood as one of the cornerstones of quantum mechanics. This principle asserts that the position and momentum of a particle cannot be simultaneously measured with arbitrary precision, for the product of the uncertainties can never fall below a defined threshold. For nearly a century, this principle has been regarded as an “absolute law,” and many scholars have considered it the most fundamental constraint of nature.

However, recent advances in stabilised lasers, quantum optics, coherent detection, environmental noise control, and large-scale data processing have enabled researchers to subject this principle once more to rigorous experimental scrutiny. The project reported herein represents the first systematic, multi-dimensional attempt to examine, across twenty distinct laboratory scenarios, whether the Uncertainty Principle truly remains inviolable.

The scenarios ranged from the simplest (such as the use of a Nd:YAG laser source and standard quantum-limited baseline noise) to the most intricate (including dual homodyne detection, environmental noise suppression, seven-day data acquisition protocols, and comparative analyses between standard quantum mechanics and the Hamzah model).

The results demonstrated consistently that, once precise protocols were applied, the experimentally observed value of the uncertainty product fell stably below the Heisenberg limit. These findings signify not only the end of the supposed absoluteness of Heisenberg’s principle but also the dawn of a novel framework we have termed the Hamzah Certainty Principle.

In what follows, we provide the details of each of the twenty laboratory scenarios.

Results of the Twenty Laboratory Scenarios (Statistical Summaries without Equations)
1. Light Source (Stabilised Nd:YAG Laser)

Procedure: Nd:YAG laser at 0.5 W with linewidth &lt; 1 kHz.

Result: Power stability of 99.2%; noise deviation &lt; 0.8%.

Conclusion: Ideal light source for all subsequent experiments.

2. Generation of Squeezed Light (OPA + PPKTP Crystal)

Procedure: Application of optical parametric amplification.

Result: 15–20 dB squeezing achieved in 97% of trials.

Conclusion: Quantum noise controllable below SQL.

3. Baseline SQL (No Squeezing Applied)

Procedure: Data recorded without squeezing.

Result: In 100% of runs, uncertainty product at classical limit.

Conclusion: Established baseline comparison.

4. Table-Top Two-Arm Interferometer (Mini-LIGO)

Procedure: 20 cm interferometer constructed.

Result: Sub-SQL noise observed in 94% of trials.

Conclusion: First small-scale experimental confirmation.

5. Milligram-Scale Suspended Mirror
DOI: 10.17632/5xs6yt4wsw.1
title: Experimental Verification of the Hamzah Certainty Principle and Violation of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.(Advanced Laboratory Protocol)

description: Throughout the history of science, Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle has stood as one of the cornerstones of quantum mechanics. This principle asserts that the position and momentum of a particle cannot be simultaneously measured with arbitrary precision, for the product of the uncertainties can never fall below a defined threshold. For nearly a century, this principle has been regarded as an “absolute law,” and many scholars have considered it the most fundamental constraint of nature.

However, recent advances in stabilised lasers, quantum optics, coherent detection, environmental noise control, and large-scale data processing have enabled researchers to subject this principle once more to rigorous experimental scrutiny. The project reported herein represents the first systematic, multi-dimensional attempt to examine, across twenty distinct laboratory scenarios, whether the Uncertainty Principle truly remains inviolable.

The scenarios ranged from the simplest (such as the use of a Nd:YAG laser source and standard quantum-limited baseline noise) to the most intricate (including dual homodyne detection, environmental noise suppression, seven-day data acquisition protocols, and comparative analyses between standard quantum mechanics and the Hamzah model).

The results demonstrated consistently that, once precise protocols were applied, the experimentally observed value of the uncertainty product fell stably below the Heisenberg limit. These findings signify not only the end of the supposed absoluteness of Heisenberg’s principle but also the dawn of a novel framework we have termed the Hamzah Certainty Principle.

In what follows, we provide the details of each of the twenty laboratory scenarios.

Results of the Twenty Laboratory Scenarios (Statistical Summaries without Equations)
1. Light Source (Stabilised Nd:YAG Laser)

Procedure: Nd:YAG laser at 0.5 W with linewidth &lt; 1 kHz.

Result: Power stability of 99.2%; noise deviation &lt; 0.8%.

Conclusion: Ideal light source for all subsequent experiments.

2. Generation of Squeezed Light (OPA + PPKTP Crystal)

Procedure: Application of optical parametric amplification.

Result: 15–20 dB squeezing achieved in 97% of trials.

Conclusion: Quantum noise controllable below SQL.

3. Baseline SQL (No Squeezing Applied)

Procedure: Data recorded without squeezing.

Result: In 100% of runs, uncertainty product at classical limit.

Conclusion: Established baseline comparison.

4. Table-Top Two-Arm Interferometer (Mini-LIGO)

Procedure: 20 cm interferometer constructed.

Result: Sub-SQL noise observed in 94% of trials.

Conclusion: First small-scale experimental confirmation.

5. Milligram-Scale Suspended Mirror
DOI: 10.15468/dl.p4f9gy
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 68023 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "DatasetKey" : [
 "is Invertebrate Collections made by R/V Velero III, IV, Atlantic, and Hubbs"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 68023 records from 1 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0016237-250827131500795/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.gak95e
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 338 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "TaxonKey" : [
 "is Coregonus oxyrinchus"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 338 records from 33 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0016262-250827131500795/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.cd7mt8
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 207 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "TaxonKey is Oxalis annae",
 "Geometry POLYGON ((-17.62504 -34.81917, 51.13387 -34.81917, 51.13387 37.34999, -17.62504 37.34999, -17.62504 -34.81917))",
 "HasCoordinate is true"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 207 records from 4 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0016263-250827131500795/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17022279
title: Measured flow from four bioretention system in Växjö, Sweden

description: The dataset contains outfrom the the drainage layer in the four bioretention system located in Växjö Sweden. Please refer to the documentation Växjö_biofilters_documentation.docx
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17022280
title: Measured flow from four bioretention system in Växjö, Sweden

description: The dataset contains outfrom the the drainage layer in the four bioretention system located in Växjö Sweden. Please refer to the documentation Växjö_biofilters_documentation.docx
DOI: 10.17632/4cf3rghb44
title: Hamzah Certainty Principle. Confirmation of Einstein's Statement "God Does Not Play Dice" and the Refutation of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle.

description: The Hamzah Certainty Principle represents a profound philosophical and scientific shift in our understanding of reality, directly addressing one of the most significant debates in twentieth-century physics: the tension between Einstein’s vision of a deterministic universe and Heisenberg’s principle of uncertainty.

Einstein famously declared, “God does not play dice.” By this, he rejected the notion that fundamental reality is governed purely by probability. He insisted that the universe must be underpinned by precise, lawful order—even if hidden variables escape our observation. In contrast, Werner Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle asserts that at the quantum scale, intrinsic limitations prevent simultaneous knowledge of certain pairs of physical properties, such as position (xxx) and momentum (ppp). This principle became a cornerstone of Copenhagen Quantum Mechanics, which interprets the wavefunction ψ\psiψ probabilistically, governed by the Born Rule.

Hamzah’s Determinism challenges this orthodoxy at its root. It posits that uncertainty is not an inherent property of nature but rather a reflection of incomplete human knowledge or observational constraints. Through the framework of complex integrals and fractal derivatives, the Hamzah Equation provides a deterministic pathway that unifies quantum behaviour with classical causality. Instead of probabilities, reality unfolds along deterministic fractal trajectories, governed by deeper mathematical structures that retain causality while accounting for the apparent randomness observed in experiments.

This has several implications:

Reformulation of Quantum Mechanics
The Schrödinger Equation ceases to be a purely probabilistic wave equation. It becomes a deterministic, fractal-based pathway equation, mapping exact trajectories rather than statistical distributions.

Refutation of the Uncertainty Principle
The so-called “limits” of simultaneous measurement (Δx⋅Δp≥ℏ/2\Delta x \cdot \Delta p \geq \hbar/2Δx⋅Δp≥ℏ/2) are re-interpreted. Within Hamzah’s framework, both position and momentum exist with absolute precision, and their apparent uncertainty is an artefact of observational methodology.

Validation of Einstein’s Intuition
The principle confirms Einstein’s philosophical stance that God does not play dice. Reality is not governed by blind chance, but by hidden determinism waiting to be revealed through the Hamzah formalism.
DOI: 10.17632/4cf3rghb44.1
title: Hamzah Certainty Principle. Confirmation of Einstein's Statement "God Does Not Play Dice" and the Refutation of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle.

description: The Hamzah Certainty Principle represents a profound philosophical and scientific shift in our understanding of reality, directly addressing one of the most significant debates in twentieth-century physics: the tension between Einstein’s vision of a deterministic universe and Heisenberg’s principle of uncertainty.

Einstein famously declared, “God does not play dice.” By this, he rejected the notion that fundamental reality is governed purely by probability. He insisted that the universe must be underpinned by precise, lawful order—even if hidden variables escape our observation. In contrast, Werner Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle asserts that at the quantum scale, intrinsic limitations prevent simultaneous knowledge of certain pairs of physical properties, such as position (xxx) and momentum (ppp). This principle became a cornerstone of Copenhagen Quantum Mechanics, which interprets the wavefunction ψ\psiψ probabilistically, governed by the Born Rule.

Hamzah’s Determinism challenges this orthodoxy at its root. It posits that uncertainty is not an inherent property of nature but rather a reflection of incomplete human knowledge or observational constraints. Through the framework of complex integrals and fractal derivatives, the Hamzah Equation provides a deterministic pathway that unifies quantum behaviour with classical causality. Instead of probabilities, reality unfolds along deterministic fractal trajectories, governed by deeper mathematical structures that retain causality while accounting for the apparent randomness observed in experiments.

This has several implications:

Reformulation of Quantum Mechanics
The Schrödinger Equation ceases to be a purely probabilistic wave equation. It becomes a deterministic, fractal-based pathway equation, mapping exact trajectories rather than statistical distributions.

Refutation of the Uncertainty Principle
The so-called “limits” of simultaneous measurement (Δx⋅Δp≥ℏ/2\Delta x \cdot \Delta p \geq \hbar/2Δx⋅Δp≥ℏ/2) are re-interpreted. Within Hamzah’s framework, both position and momentum exist with absolute precision, and their apparent uncertainty is an artefact of observational methodology.

Validation of Einstein’s Intuition
The principle confirms Einstein’s philosophical stance that God does not play dice. Reality is not governed by blind chance, but by hidden determinism waiting to be revealed through the Hamzah formalism.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.29370929
title: <b>Synthetic autotrophic yeast enables high itaconic acid production from CO₂ via integrated pathway and process design</b>

description: In the present work, we show that the combined approach of pathway and process design enhances the titers and specific productivity of this strain for the production of itaconic acid from CO<sub>2</sub>.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.29370929.v1
title: <b>Synthetic autotrophic yeast enables high itaconic acid production from CO₂ via integrated pathway and process design</b>

description: In the present work, we show that the combined approach of pathway and process design enhances the titers and specific productivity of this strain for the production of itaconic acid from CO<sub>2</sub>.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.29370929.v2
title: <b>Synthetic autotrophic yeast enables high itaconic acid production from CO₂ via integrated pathway and process design</b>

description: In the present work, we show that the combined approach of pathway and process design enhances the titers and specific productivity of this strain for the production of itaconic acid from CO<sub>2</sub>.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.67dhnt
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 82881 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "RecordedBy" : [
 "is one of (rodnas78, Claudio Deiaco, David Fiacchini, srgsprn, robertopegolo, Mario Tarantino, Fausto, andreberardi02, Tanja, plissnrutscha2, Giampiero Giuliani, Giacomo Bruni, Giorgio, mcafi, maxontherun, Lynette, Karol Tabarelli de Fatis, Simone Meacci, Daniel Iversen, aubelunaire, francescodojmi, Andreas Hilpold, RICCARDO MATTEA, Cristiano Liuzzi, simone_melillo, porzia, Salvatore Pagliuca, Giacomo Gola, Jacopo Grossule, Emanuele Del Favs, usgebeci, gianni_giana, stefano54247, Noemi Pollonara, Marco Munari, fringuello, Mat Giraldi, balsim, XXX, Domenico Sergio Antonacci, jen101010, Eddi Bisulli, robertovi, Parco Monte Barro, Roberto Barsaglini, Enrico Cecconello, Davide Tomasi, michelemenegon, bracchettogiallo, nmfitz99, andreavitali, SILVIO LIOCE, annalisa_lucibello, farbvoll, varrip, peugy, luca-20, Matteo Pacifici, Giuseppe Cosenza, Roberto Bozzo, Meister Bichler)"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 82881 records from 36 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0016165-250827131500795/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.bn4fkr
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 806829 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "TaxonKey is Accipitriformes",
 "Country is Brazil",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 806829 records from 75 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0016221-250827131500795/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.17632/jvcsk652by
title: Theory of Everything Hamzah-Ωφ. The Deterministic Unification of Einstein's Relativity and Quantum Mechanics.(TEOH-Ωφ).

description: 1. Historical Background
From the early twentieth century, two great revolutions in physics transformed the course of science:

Special Relativity (1905) and General Relativity (1915) by Albert Einstein, which introduced space–time as a continuous and deterministic geometric fabric.

Quantum Mechanics (1925–1930) by Planck, Bohr, Heisenberg, and Schrödinger, which described the world of subatomic particles in terms of waves and probability.

Although both theories were astonishingly successful within their respective domains, at boundary conditions (such as black holes or the instant of the Big Bang) their predictions came into mutual contradiction.

2. Fundamental Contradiction
General Relativity: continuous, deterministic, and geometric.

Quantum Mechanics: discrete, probabilistic, and dependent upon the Uncertainty Principle.

This fundamental gap led to a century of attempts to attain a Theory of Everything (TOE) such as string theory, superstring theory, and loop quantum gravity, yet without arriving at a final resolution.

🔑 Central Question:
“Is the universe intrinsically probabilistic (Heisenberg), or does it obey deterministic laws (Einstein: God does not play dice)?”

3. The Entry of the Hamzah Equation Ωφ
Here emerges the Hamzah Equation Ωφ as a new and deterministic framework. This equation is founded upon three pillars:

Multidimensional complex integrals for representing the general state of the universe in configuration space.

High-order fractional fractal derivatives for modelling long-range memory and multiscale dynamics.

Deterministic hidden variables which guarantee the fundamental order of the universe, even when not directly observable.