cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b58zs
title: CCDC 2150035: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Shichun Wang, Tongyu Li, Yi Heng, Dongwei Wang, Guohua Hou, Guofu Zi, Marc D. Walter|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6234|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00423
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b590v
title: CCDC 2150036: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Shichun Wang, Tongyu Li, Yi Heng, Dongwei Wang, Guohua Hou, Guofu Zi, Marc D. Walter|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6234|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00423
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b591w
title: CCDC 2150037: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Shichun Wang, Tongyu Li, Yi Heng, Dongwei Wang, Guohua Hou, Guofu Zi, Marc D. Walter|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6234|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00423
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b592x
title: CCDC 2150038: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Shichun Wang, Tongyu Li, Yi Heng, Dongwei Wang, Guohua Hou, Guofu Zi, Marc D. Walter|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6234|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00423
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b593y
title: CCDC 2150039: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Shichun Wang, Tongyu Li, Yi Heng, Dongwei Wang, Guohua Hou, Guofu Zi, Marc D. Walter|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6234|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00423
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b594z
title: CCDC 2150040: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Shichun Wang, Tongyu Li, Yi Heng, Dongwei Wang, Guohua Hou, Guofu Zi, Marc D. Walter|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6234|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00423
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b5950
title: CCDC 2150041: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Shichun Wang, Tongyu Li, Yi Heng, Dongwei Wang, Guohua Hou, Guofu Zi, Marc D. Walter|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6234|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00423
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b5961
title: CCDC 2150042: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Shichun Wang, Tongyu Li, Yi Heng, Dongwei Wang, Guohua Hou, Guofu Zi, Marc D. Walter|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6234|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00423
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b5972
title: CCDC 2150043: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Shichun Wang, Tongyu Li, Yi Heng, Dongwei Wang, Guohua Hou, Guofu Zi, Marc D. Walter|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6234|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00423
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b5983
title: CCDC 2150044: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Shichun Wang, Tongyu Li, Yi Heng, Dongwei Wang, Guohua Hou, Guofu Zi, Marc D. Walter|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6234|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00423
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b5994
title: CCDC 2150045: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Shichun Wang, Tongyu Li, Yi Heng, Dongwei Wang, Guohua Hou, Guofu Zi, Marc D. Walter|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6234|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00423
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b59b5
title: CCDC 2150046: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Shichun Wang, Tongyu Li, Yi Heng, Dongwei Wang, Guohua Hou, Guofu Zi, Marc D. Walter|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6234|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00423
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b59c6
title: CCDC 2150047: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Shichun Wang, Tongyu Li, Yi Heng, Dongwei Wang, Guohua Hou, Guofu Zi, Marc D. Walter|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6234|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00423
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b59d7
title: CCDC 2150048: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Shichun Wang, Tongyu Li, Yi Heng, Dongwei Wang, Guohua Hou, Guofu Zi, Marc D. Walter|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6234|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00423
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b00v7
title: CCDC 2144978: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Eranga H. Gamage, Raquel A. Ribeiro, Colin P. Harmer, Paul C. Canfield, Andrew Ozarowski, Kirill Kovnir|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6160|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00298
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b015l
title: CCDC 2144988: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Eranga H. Gamage, Raquel A. Ribeiro, Colin P. Harmer, Paul C. Canfield, Andrew Ozarowski, Kirill Kovnir|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6160|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00298
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b016m
title: CCDC 2144989: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Eranga H. Gamage, Raquel A. Ribeiro, Colin P. Harmer, Paul C. Canfield, Andrew Ozarowski, Kirill Kovnir|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6160|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00298
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b017n
title: CCDC 2144990: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Eranga H. Gamage, Raquel A. Ribeiro, Colin P. Harmer, Paul C. Canfield, Andrew Ozarowski, Kirill Kovnir|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6160|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00298
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b58vn
title: CCDC 2150031: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Shichun Wang, Tongyu Li, Yi Heng, Dongwei Wang, Guohua Hou, Guofu Zi, Marc D. Walter|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6234|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00423
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b58xq
title: CCDC 2150033: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Shichun Wang, Tongyu Li, Yi Heng, Dongwei Wang, Guohua Hou, Guofu Zi, Marc D. Walter|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6234|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00423
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2b58wp
title: CCDC 2150032: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Shichun Wang, Tongyu Li, Yi Heng, Dongwei Wang, Guohua Hou, Guofu Zi, Marc D. Walter|2022|Inorg.Chem.|61|6234|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00423
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2710y8
title: CCDC 2056569: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Yi-Dong Wang, Jin-Kui Liu, Xue-Jie Yang, Jun-Fang Gong, Mao-Ping Song|2022|Organometallics|41|984|doi:10.1021/acs.organomet.2c00034
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2bl6jp
title: CCDC 2162452: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Yi-Dong Wang, Jin-Kui Liu, Xue-Jie Yang, Jun-Fang Gong, Mao-Ping Song|2022|Organometallics|41|984|doi:10.1021/acs.organomet.2c00034
DOI: 10.25550/14-hq32
title: MicroCT and RNA-seq data of E13.5 mouse .....

description: We images and sequenced....
DOI: 10.17633/rd.brunel.14554902
title: Inter-Individual Differences in Executive Functions - Dataset

description: Data (individual mean response times, error rates, and working memory spans for each participant) for the manuscript entitled "Inter-individual differences in executive functions predict multitasking performance – Implications for the central attentional bottleneck"
DOI: 10.17633/rd.brunel.14554902.v1
title: Inter-Individual Differences in Executive Functions - Dataset

description: Data (individual mean response times, error rates, and working memory spans for each participant) for the manuscript entitled "Inter-individual differences in executive functions predict multitasking performance – Implications for the central attentional bottleneck"
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5645361
title: Bacteriophage genomes in the Japanese 4D microbiome project

description: 4,709 bacteriophage genomes constructed from the metagenomic dataset in the Japanese 4D microbiome project
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5645360
title: Bacteriophage genomes in the Japanese 4D microbiome project

description: 4,709 bacteriophage genomes constructed from the metagenomic dataset in the Japanese 4D microbiome project
DOI: 10.21227/m51j-p004
title: Kato Electrical Inc

description: Kato Electrical Inc. holds a 5M liability insurance certificate (more than double the industry standard), a good withstanding record with worker’s compensation board (WCB), an A+ rating in the better business bureau (BBB), and are members of HAVAN (Home Builder’s Association Vancouver), VRCA (Vancouver Regional Construction Association) and BOMA (Building Owners and Managers Association of BC). With all these achievements & acknowledgement, we proudly fall into the premium category of leading and trustworthy electrical companies in vancouver. 101 - 2362 Whyte Ave Port Coquitlam, BCCanada Info@katoelectrical.com 6042291749https://www.instagram.com/katoelectricalhttps://www.facebook.com/katoelectricalhttps://twitter.com/katoelectrical
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19672869
title: Supplementary Material for: The Impact of Donor Risk Index, Recipients’ and Operative Characteristics on Post Liver Transplant One-Year Graft Failure: A Cohort Analysis

description: <b><i>Background and Aims:</i></b> The donor risk index (DRI) quantifies donor-related characteristics potentially associated with increased risk of early graft failure. We aimed to assess the impact of the DRI, recipient and perioperative factors on post liver transplant (LT) outcomes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This was a single-center retrospective cohort study including all adult (≥18 years) patients who underwent LT from 01/2019 to 12/2019 at Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal. Primary endpoint was 1-year graft failure post LT. Associations were studied with logistic regression. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 131 cadaveric donor LT procedures were performed in 116 recipients. Recipients’ median (IQR) age was 57 (47–64) years and 101/131 (77.1%) were males. Cirrhosis was the underlying etiology in 95/131 (81.2%) transplants. Based on 8 predefined donors’ characteristics, median (IQR) DRI was 1.96 (1.67–2.16). Following adjustment for MELDNa score pre LT and SOFA score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.91 [0.56–1.47]) or lactate (aOR [95% CI] = 2.76 [0.71–10.7]) upon intensive care unit (ICU) admission post LT, DRI was not associated with 1-year graft failure. However, higher SOFA score (aOR [95% CI] = 1.20 [1.05–1.37]) or lactate (aOR [95% CI] = 1.27 [1.10–1.46]) upon ICU admission post LT were independently associated with higher odds of 1-year graft failure. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In a recent cohort of patients who underwent LT, DRI, despite being high, was not associated with 1-year graft failure, but SOFA score or lactate upon ICU admission post LT were.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19672869.v1
title: Supplementary Material for: The Impact of Donor Risk Index, Recipients’ and Operative Characteristics on Post Liver Transplant One-Year Graft Failure: A Cohort Analysis

description: <b><i>Background and Aims:</i></b> The donor risk index (DRI) quantifies donor-related characteristics potentially associated with increased risk of early graft failure. We aimed to assess the impact of the DRI, recipient and perioperative factors on post liver transplant (LT) outcomes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This was a single-center retrospective cohort study including all adult (≥18 years) patients who underwent LT from 01/2019 to 12/2019 at Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal. Primary endpoint was 1-year graft failure post LT. Associations were studied with logistic regression. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 131 cadaveric donor LT procedures were performed in 116 recipients. Recipients’ median (IQR) age was 57 (47–64) years and 101/131 (77.1%) were males. Cirrhosis was the underlying etiology in 95/131 (81.2%) transplants. Based on 8 predefined donors’ characteristics, median (IQR) DRI was 1.96 (1.67–2.16). Following adjustment for MELDNa score pre LT and SOFA score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.91 [0.56–1.47]) or lactate (aOR [95% CI] = 2.76 [0.71–10.7]) upon intensive care unit (ICU) admission post LT, DRI was not associated with 1-year graft failure. However, higher SOFA score (aOR [95% CI] = 1.20 [1.05–1.37]) or lactate (aOR [95% CI] = 1.27 [1.10–1.46]) upon ICU admission post LT were independently associated with higher odds of 1-year graft failure. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In a recent cohort of patients who underwent LT, DRI, despite being high, was not associated with 1-year graft failure, but SOFA score or lactate upon ICU admission post LT were.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.14748067
title: Genomic analysis of the lectotype specimens of European <i>Ulva rigida</i> and <i>Ulva lacinulata</i> (Ulvaceae, Chlorophyta) reveals the ongoing misapplication of names

description: Species of <i>Ulva</i> Linnaeus are nearly impossible to identify using morpho-anatomy due to their simple thallus structure and phenotypic plasticity. The current solution to this problem is to sequence DNA from field-collected specimens and match these sequences to those available in public DNA databases. However, because type specimens of many species have not been sequenced, the accuracy of these identifications is highly doubtful. <i>Ulva rigida</i> C.Agardh is reported to be one of the most widespread and ecologically important <i>Ulva</i> species, but these records are based on either morpho-anatomy or, more recently, on DNA sequences. High-throughput sequencing (HTS) was performed on the lectotype specimen of <i>U. rigida</i> from Cádiz, Spain to determine the correct application of the name. The analysis yielded its complete plastid genome. <i>rbc</i>L, <i>tuf</i>A and ITS sequences from the lectotype specimen differed at the species level from all <i>U. rigida</i> sequences deposited in public databases. Instead, the lectotype sequences of <i>U. rigida</i> were identical or very similar to sequences identified as <i>U. rotundata</i> Bliding (referred to by some as <i>U. pseudorotundata</i> Cormaci, G.Furnari & Alongi) from Ireland and Portugal, but not to the holotype of <i>U. rotundata</i> from Italy, which was identical to <i>U. lactuca</i> L. HTS of the lectotype of <i>U. lacinulata</i> (Kützing) Wittrock from Lesina, Croatia, a species morphologically similar to <i>U. rigida</i> with macroscopic marginal teeth, also yielded a complete plastid genome, with sequences identical or highly similar to GenBank <i>U. armoricana</i> Dion, Reviers & Coat, <i>U</i>. ‘<i>laetevirens</i>’, <i>U</i>. ‘<i>rigida</i>’ and <i>U. scandinavica</i> Bliding. Since <i>U. lacinulata</i> is the oldest validly published name, it is the correct one to apply to the globally distributed species that was previously but incorrectly known as <i>U. rigida</i>. Based on this genetic evidence, <i>U. rigida</i> is restricted to European waters and confirmed by DNA sequences from Ireland, Portugal and Spain. This analysis shows that many barcode species identifications and taxonomic conclusions in the genus <i>Ulva</i> are incorrect. <i>Ulva rigida</i> was misapplied and is restricted to Atlantic Europe. <i>Ulva lacinulata</i> is the dentate species of <i>Ulva</i> distributed worldwide. <i>Ulva rotundata</i> is a heterotypic synonym of <i>U. lactuca.</i>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.14748067.v1
title: Genomic analysis of the lectotype specimens of European <i>Ulva rigida</i> and <i>Ulva lacinulata</i> (Ulvaceae, Chlorophyta) reveals the ongoing misapplication of names

description: Species of <i>Ulva</i> Linnaeus are nearly impossible to identify using morpho-anatomy due to their simple thallus structure and phenotypic plasticity. The current solution to this problem is to sequence DNA from field-collected specimens and match these sequences to those available in public DNA databases. However, because type specimens of many species have not been sequenced, the accuracy of these identifications is highly doubtful. <i>Ulva rigida</i> C.Agardh is reported to be one of the most widespread and ecologically important <i>Ulva</i> species, but these records are based on either morpho-anatomy or, more recently, on DNA sequences. High-throughput sequencing (HTS) was performed on the lectotype specimen of <i>U. rigida</i> from Cádiz, Spain to determine the correct application of the name. The analysis yielded its complete plastid genome. <i>rbc</i>L, <i>tuf</i>A and ITS sequences from the lectotype specimen differed at the species level from all <i>U. rigida</i> sequences deposited in public databases. Instead, the lectotype sequences of <i>U. rigida</i> were identical or very similar to sequences identified as <i>U. rotundata</i> Bliding (referred to by some as <i>U. pseudorotundata</i> Cormaci, G.Furnari & Alongi) from Ireland and Portugal, but not to the holotype of <i>U. rotundata</i> from Italy, which was identical to <i>U. lactuca</i> L. HTS of the lectotype of <i>U. lacinulata</i> (Kützing) Wittrock from Lesina, Croatia, a species morphologically similar to <i>U. rigida</i> with macroscopic marginal teeth, also yielded a complete plastid genome, with sequences identical or highly similar to GenBank <i>U. armoricana</i> Dion, Reviers & Coat, <i>U</i>. ‘<i>laetevirens</i>’, <i>U</i>. ‘<i>rigida</i>’ and <i>U. scandinavica</i> Bliding. Since <i>U. lacinulata</i> is the oldest validly published name, it is the correct one to apply to the globally distributed species that was previously but incorrectly known as <i>U. rigida</i>. Based on this genetic evidence, <i>U. rigida</i> is restricted to European waters and confirmed by DNA sequences from Ireland, Portugal and Spain. This analysis shows that many barcode species identifications and taxonomic conclusions in the genus <i>Ulva</i> are incorrect. <i>Ulva rigida</i> was misapplied and is restricted to Atlantic Europe. <i>Ulva lacinulata</i> is the dentate species of <i>Ulva</i> distributed worldwide. <i>Ulva rotundata</i> is a heterotypic synonym of <i>U. lactuca.</i>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.16577481
title: Clarifying confusion – <i>Prorocentrum triestinum</i> J.Schiller and <i>Prorocentrum redfieldii</i> Bursa (Prorocentrales, Dinophyceae) are two different species

description: The Prorocentrales are a unique group of dinophytes based on several apomorphic traits, but species delimitation is challenging within the group. <i>Prorocentrum triestinum</i> was described by Josef Schiller in 1918 as an important bloom-forming species from Trieste (Mediterranean, Adriatic Sea) with a conspicuous asymmetric outline and a small, asymmetrically located subapical spine. All subsequent records under this name fail to conform to Schiller’s original description. These inconsistencies have their origin in John Dodge’s 1975 revision of <i>Prorocentrum</i>, which placed <i>Prorocentrum redfieldii</i>, a more symmetrical, slender species with a long apical spine, into synonymy under <i>P. triestinum</i>. To clarify this confusion, we collected samples at the type locality of <i>P. triestinum</i> in Trieste and established a strain that is morphologically consistent with the protologue and suitable for use in epitypification. Morphology and rRNA sequence data of this strain were compared with four new strains identified as <i>P. redfieldii</i> from the Mediterranean Sea and the North Atlantic Ocean. Cells of <i>P. triestinum</i> had an asymmetric outline in lateral view and a small, dorso-subapical spine. These features, which are readily resolved by light microscopy, were distinct from those of the nearly symmetrical and slender cells of <i>P. redfieldii</i>, which had a long, apically located spine. The species are nevertheless closely related and share an identical architecture of the periflagellar area with a distinctive, largely reduced accessory pore together with a very small platelet 7. This apomorphy clearly differentiates both species from other species of <i>Prorocentrum</i>. Both species differ in their primary rRNA sequences, and ITS and LSU sequence differences will enable them to be distinguished in future meta-barcoding studies. The present study demonstrates that <i>P. triestinum</i> and <i>P. redfieldii</i> are distinct species and thus contributes to a reliable biodiversity assessment of <i>Prorocentrum</i>. HIGHLIGHTS <i>Prorocentrum triestinum</i> is characterised molecularly for the first time and delimited from <i>P. redfieldii</i>. The identity of important bloom-forming species is clarified. Structural details of the periflagellar area are described.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.16577481.v1
title: Clarifying confusion – <i>Prorocentrum triestinum</i> J.Schiller and <i>Prorocentrum redfieldii</i> Bursa (Prorocentrales, Dinophyceae) are two different species

description: The Prorocentrales are a unique group of dinophytes based on several apomorphic traits, but species delimitation is challenging within the group. <i>Prorocentrum triestinum</i> was described by Josef Schiller in 1918 as an important bloom-forming species from Trieste (Mediterranean, Adriatic Sea) with a conspicuous asymmetric outline and a small, asymmetrically located subapical spine. All subsequent records under this name fail to conform to Schiller’s original description. These inconsistencies have their origin in John Dodge’s 1975 revision of <i>Prorocentrum</i>, which placed <i>Prorocentrum redfieldii</i>, a more symmetrical, slender species with a long apical spine, into synonymy under <i>P. triestinum</i>. To clarify this confusion, we collected samples at the type locality of <i>P. triestinum</i> in Trieste and established a strain that is morphologically consistent with the protologue and suitable for use in epitypification. Morphology and rRNA sequence data of this strain were compared with four new strains identified as <i>P. redfieldii</i> from the Mediterranean Sea and the North Atlantic Ocean. Cells of <i>P. triestinum</i> had an asymmetric outline in lateral view and a small, dorso-subapical spine. These features, which are readily resolved by light microscopy, were distinct from those of the nearly symmetrical and slender cells of <i>P. redfieldii</i>, which had a long, apically located spine. The species are nevertheless closely related and share an identical architecture of the periflagellar area with a distinctive, largely reduced accessory pore together with a very small platelet 7. This apomorphy clearly differentiates both species from other species of <i>Prorocentrum</i>. Both species differ in their primary rRNA sequences, and ITS and LSU sequence differences will enable them to be distinguished in future meta-barcoding studies. The present study demonstrates that <i>P. triestinum</i> and <i>P. redfieldii</i> are distinct species and thus contributes to a reliable biodiversity assessment of <i>Prorocentrum</i>. HIGHLIGHTS <i>Prorocentrum triestinum</i> is characterised molecularly for the first time and delimited from <i>P. redfieldii</i>. The identity of important bloom-forming species is clarified. Structural details of the periflagellar area are described.