cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567048
title: Appendix B. Replicate flow measurements made with the Acoustic Doppler current Profiler (ADP).

description: Replicate flow measurements made with the Acoustic Doppler current Profiler (ADP).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567048.v1
title: Appendix B. Replicate flow measurements made with the Acoustic Doppler current Profiler (ADP).

description: Replicate flow measurements made with the Acoustic Doppler current Profiler (ADP).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567045
title: Appendix C. Equatorial undercurrent (EUC) conditions at the study sites.

description: Equatorial undercurrent (EUC) conditions at the study sites.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567045.v1
title: Appendix C. Equatorial undercurrent (EUC) conditions at the study sites.

description: Equatorial undercurrent (EUC) conditions at the study sites.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567042
title: Appendix D. ANOVA table analyzing arcsine square-root-transformed percent cover of barnacles in rock wall habitats in 2003.

description: ANOVA table analyzing arcsine square-root-transformed percent cover of barnacles in rock wall habitats in 2003.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567042.v1
title: Appendix D. ANOVA table analyzing arcsine square-root-transformed percent cover of barnacles in rock wall habitats in 2003.

description: ANOVA table analyzing arcsine square-root-transformed percent cover of barnacles in rock wall habitats in 2003.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567039
title: Appendix E. ANOVA tables from analysis of barnacle recruitment in 2002, 2003, and 2004.

description: ANOVA tables from analysis of barnacle recruitment in 2002, 2003, and 2004.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567036
title: Appendix F. Regression models estimating the relation between water flow and barnacle recruitment in 2003 and 2004 as in Table 2, but based on more replicate current meter deployments.

description: Regression models estimating the relation between water flow and barnacle recruitment in 2003 and 2004 as in Table 2, but based on more replicate current meter deployments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567039.v1
title: Appendix E. ANOVA tables from analysis of barnacle recruitment in 2002, 2003, and 2004.

description: ANOVA tables from analysis of barnacle recruitment in 2002, 2003, and 2004.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567036.v1
title: Appendix F. Regression models estimating the relation between water flow and barnacle recruitment in 2003 and 2004 as in Table 2, but based on more replicate current meter deployments.

description: Regression models estimating the relation between water flow and barnacle recruitment in 2003 and 2004 as in Table 2, but based on more replicate current meter deployments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567033
title: Appendix G. Statistical analysis of barnacle growth data.

description: Statistical analysis of barnacle growth data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567033.v1
title: Appendix G. Statistical analysis of barnacle growth data.

description: Statistical analysis of barnacle growth data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567030
title: Appendix H. Relationships between attributes of prey abundance, either the percent cover or recruitment of Megabalanus barnacles, and the density of predators, the whelk Hexaplex princeps, and the sea urchin Eucidaris galapagensis at different depths.

description: Relationships between attributes of prey abundance, either the percent cover or recruitment of Megabalanus barnacles, and the density of predators, the whelk Hexaplex princeps, and the sea urchin Eucidaris galapagensis at different depths.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567030.v1
title: Appendix H. Relationships between attributes of prey abundance, either the percent cover or recruitment of Megabalanus barnacles, and the density of predators, the whelk Hexaplex princeps, and the sea urchin Eucidaris galapagensis at different depths.

description: Relationships between attributes of prey abundance, either the percent cover or recruitment of Megabalanus barnacles, and the density of predators, the whelk Hexaplex princeps, and the sea urchin Eucidaris galapagensis at different depths.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567027
title: Appendix I. Relationship between maximum bottom depth within 15 km of the study sites and the frequency of EUC water masses at the study sites.

description: Relationship between maximum bottom depth within 15 km of the study sites and the frequency of EUC water masses at the study sites.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567027.v1
title: Appendix I. Relationship between maximum bottom depth within 15 km of the study sites and the frequency of EUC water masses at the study sites.

description: Relationship between maximum bottom depth within 15 km of the study sites and the frequency of EUC water masses at the study sites.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567024
title: Appendix J. Photo quadrat area of rock wall community at 15 m depth at Rocas Gordon, January 2003, illustrating effects of fish predation on Megabalanus peninsularis barnacles.

description: Photo quadrat area of rock wall community at 15 m depth at Rocas Gordon, January 2003, illustrating effects of fish predation on Megabalanus peninsularis barnacles.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567024.v1
title: Appendix J. Photo quadrat area of rock wall community at 15 m depth at Rocas Gordon, January 2003, illustrating effects of fish predation on Megabalanus peninsularis barnacles.

description: Photo quadrat area of rock wall community at 15 m depth at Rocas Gordon, January 2003, illustrating effects of fish predation on Megabalanus peninsularis barnacles.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567021
title: Appendix A. Definitions of variables.

description: Definitions of variables.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567018
title: Appendix B. Multilevel regression example.

description: Multilevel regression example.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567018.v1
title: Appendix B. Multilevel regression example.

description: Multilevel regression example.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567015
title: Appendix C. A description of the conditional Akaike information criterion (cAIC).

description: A description of the conditional Akaike information criterion (cAIC).
DOI: 10.18462/iir.rankine.2020.1218
title: Pushing the envelope: extending the range and performance of R744.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567012
title: Appendix D. Model selection tables for consumer response magnitude analyses.

description: Model selection tables for consumer response magnitude analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567009
title: Appendix E. Model selection tables for consumer response duration analyses.

description: Model selection tables for consumer response duration analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567009.v1
title: Appendix E. Model selection tables for consumer response duration analyses.

description: Model selection tables for consumer response duration analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567006
title: Appendix F. Model selection tables for consumer response lag analyses.

description: Model selection tables for consumer response lag analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567006.v1
title: Appendix F. Model selection tables for consumer response lag analyses.

description: Model selection tables for consumer response lag analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567003
title: Appendix G. Model selection tables for trophic distance analyses.

description: Model selection tables for trophic distance analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567003.v1
title: Appendix G. Model selection tables for trophic distance analyses.

description: Model selection tables for trophic distance analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567000
title: Appendix H. Analysis of single-trophic-level and multi-trophic-level studies at trophic distances of 1.

description: Analysis of single-trophic-level and multi-trophic-level studies at trophic distances of 1.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3567000.v1
title: Appendix H. Analysis of single-trophic-level and multi-trophic-level studies at trophic distances of 1.

description: Analysis of single-trophic-level and multi-trophic-level studies at trophic distances of 1.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566997
title: Supplement 1. A table of raw data used in this meta-analysis.

description: File List data.txt<br> Description The "data.txt" file is a tab-delimited text file containing the raw data used in this meta-analysis. Column definitions: interaction ID: unique numeric identification number for each pairwise resource-consumer interaction system: the location of study latitude: latitude of system in degree-minute-seconds longitude: longitude of system in degree-minute-seconds ecosystem type: the broad habitat category (i.e. aquatic, including marine and freshwater subtypes, or terrestrial) ecosystem subtype: the specific habitat category (e.g. temperate forest or freshwater) study type: observational or experimental event: the specific occurrence of a primary resource pulse in time pulse duration (d): the length of time that resource availability was more than 10% greater than the baseline condition in days response duration (d): the length of time that consumer densities or recruitment were more than 10% greater than the baseline condition in days resource: short description of the resource identity consumer: short description of the consumer identity trophic level of resource: the integer trophic level of the dominant pulsed resource (as described in text) consumer trophic level: the integer trophic level of the consumer (as described in text) consumer trophic position: autotrophy or heterotrophy consumer trophic distance: the minimum number of trophic levels between the focal consumer and the primary pulsed resource R baseline, Rb: resource availability in the baseline state R pulse, Rp: maximum resource availability in the pulsed state R units: units of resource availability R ratio: Rp/Rb ln (R ratio): ln(Rp/Rb), resource pulse magnitude C baseline, Cb: consumer density or recruitment in the baseline state C pulse, Cp: maximum consumer density or recruitment in the pulsed state C units: units of consumer density C ratio: Cp/Cb ln(C ratio): ln(Cp/Cb), consumer response magnitude ln(C ratio/R ratio): ln[(Cp/Cb)/(Rp/Rb)], relative response magnitude, measures the magnitude of consumer responses relative to their resource pulses estimated consumer body mass (g): the average mass of the consumer at reproduction estimated consumer generation time (d): the average interval of time between the birth, germination or division of the consumer and the birth, germination or division of their offspring in days response lag (d): the length of time between the observed peak of resource availability and the observed peak consumer density in days consumer response mechanism: the primary mode of numerical response (i.e. reproductive, aggregative, or combined reproductive and aggregative) reference(s): key literature citations, see manuscript notes: additional notes
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566997.v1
title: Supplement 1. A table of raw data used in this meta-analysis.

description: File List data.txt<br> Description The "data.txt" file is a tab-delimited text file containing the raw data used in this meta-analysis. Column definitions: interaction ID: unique numeric identification number for each pairwise resource-consumer interaction system: the location of study latitude: latitude of system in degree-minute-seconds longitude: longitude of system in degree-minute-seconds ecosystem type: the broad habitat category (i.e. aquatic, including marine and freshwater subtypes, or terrestrial) ecosystem subtype: the specific habitat category (e.g. temperate forest or freshwater) study type: observational or experimental event: the specific occurrence of a primary resource pulse in time pulse duration (d): the length of time that resource availability was more than 10% greater than the baseline condition in days response duration (d): the length of time that consumer densities or recruitment were more than 10% greater than the baseline condition in days resource: short description of the resource identity consumer: short description of the consumer identity trophic level of resource: the integer trophic level of the dominant pulsed resource (as described in text) consumer trophic level: the integer trophic level of the consumer (as described in text) consumer trophic position: autotrophy or heterotrophy consumer trophic distance: the minimum number of trophic levels between the focal consumer and the primary pulsed resource R baseline, Rb: resource availability in the baseline state R pulse, Rp: maximum resource availability in the pulsed state R units: units of resource availability R ratio: Rp/Rb ln (R ratio): ln(Rp/Rb), resource pulse magnitude C baseline, Cb: consumer density or recruitment in the baseline state C pulse, Cp: maximum consumer density or recruitment in the pulsed state C units: units of consumer density C ratio: Cp/Cb ln(C ratio): ln(Cp/Cb), consumer response magnitude ln(C ratio/R ratio): ln[(Cp/Cb)/(Rp/Rb)], relative response magnitude, measures the magnitude of consumer responses relative to their resource pulses estimated consumer body mass (g): the average mass of the consumer at reproduction estimated consumer generation time (d): the average interval of time between the birth, germination or division of the consumer and the birth, germination or division of their offspring in days response lag (d): the length of time between the observed peak of resource availability and the observed peak consumer density in days consumer response mechanism: the primary mode of numerical response (i.e. reproductive, aggregative, or combined reproductive and aggregative) reference(s): key literature citations, see manuscript notes: additional notes
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566994
title: Appendix A. Description of measurements used in the morphological analysis.

description: Description of measurements used in the morphological analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566991
title: Appendix B. Mean of linear measurements representing morphological traits for each leaf-litter ant species collected in four Atlantic forest localities in Brazil, according to guild classification used for co-occurrence analysis (guild proportionality tests).

description: Mean of linear measurements representing morphological traits for each leaf-litter ant species collected in four Atlantic forest localities in Brazil, according to guild classification used for co-occurrence analysis (guild proportionality tests).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566988
title: Appendix C. Observed variance of the nearest-neighbor distance (VAR-NND) among coexisting leaf-litter ant assemblage for four Atlantic Forest localities in Brazil, generated by randomly choosing without replacement from the regional species pool (171 species) the same number of species found at each site, using two different procedures.

description: Observed variance of the nearest-neighbor distance (VAR-NND) among coexisting leaf-litter ant assemblage for four Atlantic Forest localities in Brazil, generated by randomly choosing without replacement from the regional species pool (171 species) the same number of species found at each site, using two different procedures.
DOI: 10.18462/iir.rankine.2020.1217
title: High-performance air-conditioning refrigerants with low GWP.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566985
title: Appendix D. Local-scale morphological null model analyses applied to body size, shape size, and body size + shape.

description: Local-scale morphological null model analyses applied to body size, shape size, and body size + shape.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566985.v1
title: Appendix D. Local-scale morphological null model analyses applied to body size, shape size, and body size + shape.

description: Local-scale morphological null model analyses applied to body size, shape size, and body size + shape.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566982
title: Appendix E. Species richness for the leaf-litter ant fauna sampled in eight Atlantic forest sites from southeastern and south Brazil, and individual-based rarefaction curves for leaf-litter ant fauna in the training data set and in the validation data set.

description: Species richness for the leaf-litter ant fauna sampled in eight Atlantic forest sites from southeastern and south Brazil, and individual-based rarefaction curves for leaf-litter ant fauna in the training data set and in the validation data set.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566982.v1
title: Appendix E. Species richness for the leaf-litter ant fauna sampled in eight Atlantic forest sites from southeastern and south Brazil, and individual-based rarefaction curves for leaf-litter ant fauna in the training data set and in the validation data set.

description: Species richness for the leaf-litter ant fauna sampled in eight Atlantic forest sites from southeastern and south Brazil, and individual-based rarefaction curves for leaf-litter ant fauna in the training data set and in the validation data set.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566979
title: Supplement 1. R scripts used in morphological null model and guild proportionality analysis.

description: File List MNND_Analysis_supplement_Code.R Guild_Proportionality_Analysis_supplement_Code.R Morphological_and_Guild_Analysis_supplement_Code.R Description These code illustrates in detail the R scripts used in morphological null model and guild proportionality analysis. For the morphological null model analysis, the code provided here uses the R function <i>sample</i> in the R-package base to build a null distribution of species traits and tests if the morphological structure of the assemblage is more variable (significant divergence) or more uniform (significant aggregation) than expected from assemblages that are comprised of random samples drawn from a pool of potential colonizers. For the guild proportionality analysis, the code provided here uses random matrices of species co-occurrences generate by EcoSim software (Gotelli and Entsminger 2005) to calculate the observed Variance Relative Index (Watkins and Wilson 2003). This index has a range of +1 to -1; assuming value equal to 0 when the observed variance in guild proportion is equal to that expected under the null model, and value smaller than 0 when there is guild proportionality (Alpha guilds). A value &gt; 0 indicates disproportionality (Beta guilds structuring). MNND_Analysis_supplement_Code.R contains annotated code for morphological null model analysis.<br> Guild_Proportionality_Analysis_supplement_Code.R contains annotated code for guild proportionality analysis.<br> Morphological_and_Guild_Analysis_supplement_Code.R contains annotated code used in morphological null models analysis and guild proportionality analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566979.v1
title: Supplement 1. R scripts used in morphological null model and guild proportionality analysis.

description: File List MNND_Analysis_supplement_Code.R Guild_Proportionality_Analysis_supplement_Code.R Morphological_and_Guild_Analysis_supplement_Code.R Description These code illustrates in detail the R scripts used in morphological null model and guild proportionality analysis. For the morphological null model analysis, the code provided here uses the R function <i>sample</i> in the R-package base to build a null distribution of species traits and tests if the morphological structure of the assemblage is more variable (significant divergence) or more uniform (significant aggregation) than expected from assemblages that are comprised of random samples drawn from a pool of potential colonizers. For the guild proportionality analysis, the code provided here uses random matrices of species co-occurrences generate by EcoSim software (Gotelli and Entsminger 2005) to calculate the observed Variance Relative Index (Watkins and Wilson 2003). This index has a range of +1 to -1; assuming value equal to 0 when the observed variance in guild proportion is equal to that expected under the null model, and value smaller than 0 when there is guild proportionality (Alpha guilds). A value &gt; 0 indicates disproportionality (Beta guilds structuring). MNND_Analysis_supplement_Code.R contains annotated code for morphological null model analysis.<br> Guild_Proportionality_Analysis_supplement_Code.R contains annotated code for guild proportionality analysis.<br> Morphological_and_Guild_Analysis_supplement_Code.R contains annotated code used in morphological null models analysis and guild proportionality analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566976
title: Appendix A. Further exposition on modeling with a second-order composite.

description: Further exposition on modeling with a second-order composite.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566976.v1
title: Appendix A. Further exposition on modeling with a second-order composite.

description: Further exposition on modeling with a second-order composite.
DOI: 10.18462/iir.rankine.2020.1215
title: A R744 transcritical refrigeration test rig equipped with a transparent two-phase ejector for flow visualisation: experimental study.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566973
title: Appendix A. The derivation of a model ensemble useful for predicting changes in penguin habitat.

description: The derivation of a model ensemble useful for predicting changes in penguin habitat.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566973.v1
title: Appendix A. The derivation of a model ensemble useful for predicting changes in penguin habitat.

description: The derivation of a model ensemble useful for predicting changes in penguin habitat.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566970
title: Appendix A. Numbers of individuals of each species measured per survey occasion.

description: Numbers of individuals of each species measured per survey occasion.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566970.v1
title: Appendix A. Numbers of individuals of each species measured per survey occasion.

description: Numbers of individuals of each species measured per survey occasion.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566967
title: Appendix B. Drawings of the seven shape components for anuran and newt larvae.

description: Drawings of the seven shape components for anuran and newt larvae.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566967.v1
title: Appendix B. Drawings of the seven shape components for anuran and newt larvae.

description: Drawings of the seven shape components for anuran and newt larvae.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566964
title: Appendix C. Phenotypic variation among years and ponds in morphological shape of tadpoles and newt larvae.

description: Phenotypic variation among years and ponds in morphological shape of tadpoles and newt larvae.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566964.v1
title: Appendix C. Phenotypic variation among years and ponds in morphological shape of tadpoles and newt larvae.

description: Phenotypic variation among years and ponds in morphological shape of tadpoles and newt larvae.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566850
title: Appendix D. Mixed-effects models on measures of morphological shape in tadpoles and newt larvae.

description: Mixed-effects models on measures of morphological shape in tadpoles and newt larvae.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566850.v1
title: Appendix D. Mixed-effects models on measures of morphological shape in tadpoles and newt larvae.

description: Mixed-effects models on measures of morphological shape in tadpoles and newt larvae.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566847
title: Appendix E. Relationships between size and shape in tadpoles and anuran larvae collected in the field survey.

description: Relationships between size and shape in tadpoles and anuran larvae collected in the field survey.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566847.v1
title: Appendix E. Relationships between size and shape in tadpoles and anuran larvae collected in the field survey.

description: Relationships between size and shape in tadpoles and anuran larvae collected in the field survey.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3566844
title: Appendix A. Instrument deployment details for albatrosses tracked from Bird Island, South Georgia during the 2001–2004 breeding seasons.

description: Instrument deployment details for albatrosses tracked from Bird Island, South Georgia during the 2001–2004 breeding seasons.