cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/cjbtgd
title: State Economic and Government Finance Data

description: State economic and state government finance data, including data on the professionalization of state legislatures. This is an update to Klarner, Carl, 2013, "State Economic Data", http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/20404, Harvard Dataverse, V1, published February 25, 2013, which contained the file State_Econ_Quarterly2012_09_06.xlsx. The title of this edition has been altered to better reflect the contents of the dataset. State economic variables include 1) personal income (annual 1929-2014, quarterly; 1948q1-2015q1), 2) disposable income (annual 1948-2014), 3) gross state product (annual 1963-2014), 4) unemployment (annual 1960-2014, quarterly 1975q1-2015q3). Quarterly data for all the above variables was also imputed from annual data when not available. State government finance variables include total revenue, total revenue minus federal intergovernmental transfers, general revenue, multiple tax categories, total expenditure, general expenditure, budget surplus / deficit, debt at end of fiscal year, and spending on the state legislature. The following calculations were made for state government finance data: 1) deflated by consumer price index (both national and regional), and computed as per capita, 2) deflated by state income, 3) deflated by gross state product, 4) differenced from last fiscal year, and 5) computed as percent changes from last fiscal year.
description: The file 081StateEconAndGovFinancesForUse20151112.dta is the file with the final economic and state government finance data in it. The file 081StateEconAndGovFinancesForUse20151112Codebook.docx is the codebook for 081StateEconAndGovFinancesForUse20151112.dta. It has variable definitions and data sources. The document 000_HowDataConstructed20151112.docx explains how the data were constructed, including step by step instructions for obtaining every data source used in the construction of file 081. Most of this file is STATA code. The file 000_STATA_Code20151112.do has all the STATA code used for construction of 081StateEconAndGovFinancesForUse.dta. All of this code is also in the document 000_HowDataConstructed20151112.docx. The zip folder 083SourceFiles includes all files used to construct this dataset, as well as some files that were created as intermediate steps along the way. Dataverse isn't allowing me to upload this as a zip file, but feel free to contact me for it before this issue is resolved. The files that may be of most interest in the zip folder 083SourceFiles have state government finance categories that do not appear in the file 081StateEconAndGovFinancesForUse.dta. These files are 039_Revenues20150805.csv, 040_ExpendituresA20150805.csv, 041_ExpendituresB20150805.csv, 042_DebtandCashSecurities20150805.csvm 074StateGovFinances1992to2013.dta and 076StateGovFinanceItemCodes1996to2013. State government finances for fiscal year 2014, as well as revised fiscal year 2013 data, are scheduled to be released by the U.S. Census sometime in January 2016. Let me know if you have any questions or comments at Carl.Klarner@gmail.com.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/crzvko
title: Wave 1 & 2 Data for Scaling Up Behavioral Science Interventions in Online Education

description: Individual-level data for Waves 1 & 2
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/k7lofc
title: Passed Acts; St. 1965, c.641, SC1/series 229, Petition of Royal L. Bolling

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Racial discrimination &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25455156"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25455156&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Suffolk County &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Royal L. Bolling, Boston; committee on education; committee on ways and means; committee on rules &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Royal L. Bolling&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1965-01-06,1965-01-06,1965-04-20,1965-06-14 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on January 6, 1965 and referred to the committee on education and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on January 6, 1965 and concurred and received in the House on April 20, 1965 and referred to the committee on ways and means and discharged from committee on ways and means on June 14, 1965 and referred to the committee on rules &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred, received, referred, discharged, referred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Males of color signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, [males of color] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: to prohibit the payment of state aid to towns having schools wherein racial imbalance exists, [many additional documents in folder] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: St. 1965, c.641, passed August 18, 1965 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/crvj5c
title: Abortion policies and symptoms of postpartum depression across countries

description: A unique dataset from multiple open sources. Firstly, considering macro-level economic, health, and sociodemographic variables, considered in an original meta-regression dataset (Hahn-Holbrook et al., 2018: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29449816/). Then, we compiled national-level predictors related to structural gender inequality: abortion policies, intimate partner violence, and a composite rank for gender inequality. 
The codes are also included (Stata16).
description: Dataset for a manuscript entitled: Abortion policies and symptoms of postpartum depression across countries.
This manuscript has been submitted for review.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/hckv0t
title: A16_30628.jpg

description: Link to OCHRE database: &lt;a href = 'http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/2f5bbfc5-2b96-4ec7-a3e0-4e295cfdb576'&gt;http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/2f5bbfc5-2b96-4ec7-a3e0-4e295cfdb576
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/icrx98
title: Stiffness, Noise Level 10

description: Stiffness, Noise Level 10
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/kyeq7x
title: Experimental Data: Framing in an experiment on voting and redistribution

description: Experimental data, experimental instructions and replication code for a framing experiment on collective decisions about redistribution.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/lkfomw
title: The Conditional Effect of Conspiracy Thinking on Attitudes toward Climate Change

description: Even though climate scientists are nearly unanimous that climate change is real and manmade, about 40 percent of Americans reject the scientific consensus. Why? The largest contributing factor is partisanship; however, recent studies argue that underlying conspiracy thinking exerts a small, positive, and linear effect on climate change denial. In this article, we reexamine the effect of conspiracy thinking on climate change attitudes by accounting for the various pathways that conspiracy thinking could drive denialism in a politically polarized environment. We find the effects of conspiracy thinking on climate change denial are not only much larger than previously suggested, but also non-monotonic and conditional on individuals’ party identification. Moreover, we find evidence suggesting conspiracy thinking affects independents’ positions, and even their partisan leanings. These findings further explain why people reject the scientific consensus on climate change, and suggests that climate change denial is not merely the product of partisan polarization.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/furk2
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1851, Docket 3162, SC1/series 230, Petition of Frank B. Fay

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Abolition of capital punishment &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13481587"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13481587&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Chelsea &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Charles Hubbard, Suffolk; committee on the abolition of the death penalty &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Frank B. Fay&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;John Low&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Goerge Vail&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Samuel Batchelder&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1851-03-17,1851-03-19 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the Senate on March 17, 1851 and referred to the committee on the abolition of the death penalty and sent for concurrence and received in the House on March 19, 1851 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 117 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 117 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: [payment?] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1851, Docket 3162 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/iauuqj
title: Replication Data For: Policy Rhetoric Can Have Economic Consequences: Presidential Rhetorical Liberalism and Economic Policy Uncertainty

description: The response of economic variables to changes in the policy ideology expressed through presidential rhetoric is an area in need of extensive empirical exploration. An increase in liberal policy rhetoric can serve as an indicator of an executive branch that will, in general, attempt to increase government involvement in policy areas that have a significant bearing on the economy. Such policy rhetoric is a cue that should lower the extent of uncertainty about what the characteristics of economic policy will consist of. The recent development of a historical indicator of economic policy uncertainty in the United States allows researchers to assess whether the style employed in presidential rhetoric has any bearing on the extent of economic policy uncertainty that is present in the socio-political environment. The vector autoregression time series analysis performed in this project suggests presidential ideological tone Granger-causes economic policy uncertainty. The moving average representation analysis indicates an increase in presidential rhetorical liberalism results in a decrease in the
economic policy uncertainty index for a period of time. Chief executives in the United States could be strategically expressing language supporting the expansion of federal government involvement in domestic affairs to mitigate the level of uncertainty about economic policy that is present in the socio-political environment.
description: Article: "Policy rhetoric can have economic consequences: Presidential rhetorical liberalism and economic policy uncertainty." Journal of Global Economics, Management and Business Research. 4 (2): 65-80.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/idxwka
title: Replication Data for: Voters and Donors: The Unequal Political Consequences of Fracking

description: Contains Stata data sets and .do files for replicating all figures and tables in the main article and the appendix.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/qcukq
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1840, Docket 788, SC1/series 230, Petition of Josiah M. Barnes

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Against the gag rule &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10956364"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10956364&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Waltham &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: George Bradburn, Nantucket; Lewis, Waltham &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Josiah M. Barnes&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Judith Smith&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Lewis Sanger&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 120 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 63 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 57 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: inhabitants, men, women, [females], ["male"], ["female"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1840, Docket 788 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/qd18pq
title: A92_4844b.jpg

description: Link to OCHRE database: &lt;a href = 'http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/1978b619-3018-0f37-eecb-a41436213c9b'&gt;http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/1978b619-3018-0f37-eecb-a41436213c9b
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/r193jo
title: Replication data for: "School Accountability, Postsecondary Attainment and Earnings"

description: Deming, David J., Cohodes, Sarah, Jennings, Jennifer, and Jencks, Christopher, (2016) "School Accountability, Postsecondary Attainment and Earnings." Review of Economics and Statistics 98:5, 848-863
description: Volume XX, Issue X
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/r2rooh
title: Replication data for: Network Polarization, Network Interdependence, and International Conflict, 1816-2002

description: This study examines the effect of polarization and interdependence on systemic conflict. It argues that both polarization and interdependence must be conceptualized in terms of different types of relations among states and that different relationships would reflect varied levels of polarization and inter-dependence. Accordingly, this study develops general measures of network polarization and interdependence that allow measurement of these concepts over a wide array of international relations. Hypotheses are deduced from the realist and liberal paradigms about how alliance polarization, trade polarization, and cultural polarization affect systemic conflict. Likewise, hypotheses are deduced regarding the expected effects of strategic and economic interdependence on conflict. These hypotheses are tested using data on alliance, trade, linguistic, and religious networks over the period 1816–2002. The findings suggest that alliance polarization and strategic interdependence increase the amount of systemic conflict, while trade polarization and economic interdependence have a dampening effect on the amount of conflict in the international system. The theoretical implications of these results are discussed.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/vv8ruh
title: Replication Data for: Populism, Democracy, and the Post-2020 Republican Party in Congress

description: The dataset contains information on Republican House members' decisions to run for renomination as well as primary election outcomes. In addition, the data contain information about Republican members' roll call votes on the impeachment of Donald Trump and the creation of the January 6 Commission.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/w5mpx9
title: A07_16085.jpg

description: Link to OCHRE database: &lt;a href = 'http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/0026e6b8-8cf7-9dba-8d28-cc6c6262f866'&gt;http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/0026e6b8-8cf7-9dba-8d28-cc6c6262f866
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/wk0da7
title: Replication Data for: Presidential Approval and the Inherited Economy

description: Are leaders held accountable for inherited conditions, and does accountability increase with time in office? I combine hundreds of opinion polls to test how new presidents are rewarded or punished for current economic perceptions, and how these judgments evolve over time. I find the economy influences voter evaluations in a president's first year, that it influences evaluations more so in the second year, and that it does not influence evaluations any more in later years. Surveys of governor approval and state economic conditions yield similar results, as does an original survey experiment exploiting the varying tenure of state governors in the wake of the 2018 elections. While raising questions about voter competence, these findings also suggest leaders have incentives to spread effort more broadly over their terms.
description: This dataset underwent an independent verification process that replicated the tables and figures in the primary article. For the supplementary materials, verification was performed solely for the successful execution of code. Per the AJPS editors approval, the variable documentation in the codebook does not describe all the missing values in the data. The verification process was carried out by the Odum Institute for Research in Social Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 
<br>
The associated article has been awarded Open Materials and Open Data PA Badges. The author can not share all of the datasets in Dataverse due to terms of use restrictions; however, these datasets are available publicly from a trusted repository. Learn more about the Open Practice Badges from the Center for Open Science.<br>
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/c6xse5
title: Wright Files I-Z Edited; Docketed Case: 20600
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/gmn7m
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1836, Docket 9844, SC1/series 231, Petition of Robert Rantoul Jr.

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Abolition of capital punishment &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13481609"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13481609&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Cotton Bennett, Beverly; committee on the subject thereof &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Robert Rantoul Jr.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Stephens Baker&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Seaward Lee&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;William Endicott&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Robert Ingersol&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Calvin Whiting&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1836-02-03 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on February 3, 1836 and referred to the committee on the subject thereof &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 30 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 30 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: undersigned, ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1836, Docket 9844 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/k1malw
title: Evaluating the impact of the Uttar Pradesh Community Mobilization Project in improving maternal and child health behaviors in self-help groups in Uttar Pradesh, India

description: The Population Council has been working in the state of Uttar Pradesh to rigorously evaluate whether and how a broad range of interventions through self-help groups can lead to positive behavior change and access to services in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health and nutrition. This dataset includes findings from a quasi-experimental study conducted in 2017 that capture the effect of integrating health and nutrition messaging into empowerment pathways among women who are members of self-help groups and who have a child under the age of one.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/mttjux
title: Replication data for: The Great Powers and the International System

description: Do great leaders make history? Or are they compelled to act by historical circumstance? This debate has remained unresolved since Thomas Carlyle and Karl Marx framed it in the mid-nineteenth century, yet implicit answers inform our policies and our views of history. In this book, Professor Bear F. Braumoeller argues persuasively that both perspectives are correct: leaders shape the main material and ideological forces of history that subsequently constrain and compel them. His studies of the Congress of Vienna, the interwar period, and the end of the Cold War illustrate this dynamic, and the data he marshals provide systematic evidence that leaders both shape and are constrained by the structure of the international system.