cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14183705
title: TABLE 1 in Morphological identification of Glyptothrips species (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae)

description: TABLE 1. List of Glyptothrips species and material studied for each.
SpeciesLiterature dataType specimensG. arkansanusStannard 1968; Mound 1977.♀ lectotype, 1♀ and 1♂ paralectotypes, deposited at NMNHG. buccaMound 1976, 1977.♀ holotype, 1♂ allotype, deposited at NMNHG. clavigerStannard 1955, 1957, 1968; Mound 1976, 1977.♀ holotype, 1♀ and 1♂ paratypes, deposited at NMNHG. divergensMound 1977.1♀ and 1♂ paratypes, deposited at NMNHG. flavescensWatson 1934, 1935; Stannard 1955, 1957, 1968; Mound 1977.♀ holotype, 1♀ paratype, deposited at NMNHG. floridensisStannard 1957; Mound 1976, 1977.♂ type, deposited at INHSG. fuscipesMound 1977.♀ holotype, 1♀ and 1♂ paratypes, deposited at NMNHG. hylaeusMound 1977.♂ holotype, deposited at NMNHG. interiorStannard 1957, 1968; Mound 1976, 1977.♂ paratype, deposited at INHSG. longicepsMound 1977.♀ holotype, deposited at NMNHG. reticulatusHood 1941; Stannard 1955, 1957, 1968; Mound 1976, 1977.Eurythrips sculpturus Hood (synonym) ♀ holotype, Eurythrips silvarum Hood (synonym) ♀ holotype, deposited at NMNHG. saltuariusMound 1977.♀ holotype, ♂ allotype, deposited at NMNHG. silvaticusMound 1976, 1977.♀ holotype, deposited at NMNHG. subcalvusMound 1976, 1977.♀ paratype, deposited at NMNH
description: Published as part of Lindner, Mariana Flores, Ferrari, Augusto, Lima, Élison Fabrício Bezerra & Cavalleri, Adriano, 2023, Morphological identification of Glyptothrips species (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae), pp. 33 in Zootaxa 5375 (1) on page 33, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5375.1.2, http://zenodo.org/record/10170724
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14183708
title: TABLE 1 in The immature stages and female imago of Rheocricotopus (Psilocricotopus) sirventorum Andersen & Mendes, 2012, a Neotropical member of the chalybeatus species group (Diptera, Chironomidae, Orthocladiinae)

description: TABLE 1. Lengths (in μm) and proportions of leg segments in Rheocricotopus (Psilocricotopus) sirventorum Andersen & Mendes, 2012, adult female (n = 1).
FeTita 1ta 2ta 3ta 4p 142452231520714889p 2404414217996930p 340448326611810849ta 5LRBVSVBRp 1590.602.513.001.6p 2390.524.383.770.9p 3490.553.553.332.2
description: Published as part of Pinho, Luiz Carlos & Andersen, Trond, 2023, The immature stages and female imago of Rheocricotopus (Psilocricotopus) sirventorum Andersen & Mendes, 2012, a Neotropical member of the chalybeatus species group (Diptera, Chironomidae, Orthocladiinae), pp. 596 in Zootaxa 5375 (4) on page 596, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5375.4.11, http://zenodo.org/record/10202899
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14183709
title: TABLE 1 in The immature stages and female imago of Rheocricotopus (Psilocricotopus) sirventorum Andersen & Mendes, 2012, a Neotropical member of the chalybeatus species group (Diptera, Chironomidae, Orthocladiinae)

description: TABLE 1. Lengths (in μm) and proportions of leg segments in Rheocricotopus (Psilocricotopus) sirventorum Andersen & Mendes, 2012, adult female (n = 1).
FeTita 1ta 2ta 3ta 4p 142452231520714889p 2404414217996930p 340448326611810849ta 5LRBVSVBRp 1590.602.513.001.6p 2390.524.383.770.9p 3490.553.553.332.2
description: Published as part of Pinho, Luiz Carlos & Andersen, Trond, 2023, The immature stages and female imago of Rheocricotopus (Psilocricotopus) sirventorum Andersen & Mendes, 2012, a Neotropical member of the chalybeatus species group (Diptera, Chironomidae, Orthocladiinae), pp. 596 in Zootaxa 5375 (4) on page 596, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5375.4.11, http://zenodo.org/record/10202899
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14183711
title: TABLE 1 in A new blind genus of Anurophorinae (Collembola: Isotomidae) with seven anal spines from Northwest China

description: TABLE 1. Number of anal spines in spined genera of Anurophorinae with Abd. IV and V separated (the genera are listed in ascending order of the number of spines)
GenusAbd. IVAbd. VAbd. VITotal numberMartynovella Deharveng, 19780202Sahacanthella Potapov & Stebaeva, 19931*202Uzelia Absolon, 19010202Yosiiella Hüther, 19670224Dimorphocanthella Potapov, Bu, Huang, Gao & Luan, 20100404Sibiracanthella Potapov & Stebaeva, 19930404Tetracanthella Schött, 18910404Blissia Rusek, 1985 (B.glabra Rusek, 1985)0404Tuvia Grinbergs, 19620235Pentacanthella Deharveng, 19780415Blissia Rusek, 1985 (B. robusta Fjellberg & Potapov, 1998)2406Heptacanthella new genus0437Tiancanthella Rusek, 19790808Octodontophora Tshelnokov, 19900819
* 1 medial conical protuberance in Sahacanthella
description: Published as part of Gao, Yan, Potapov, Mikhail & Bu, Yun, 2022, A new blind genus of Anurophorinae (Collembola: Isotomidae) with seven anal spines from Northwest China, pp. 81 in Zootaxa 5104 (1) on page 81, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5104.1.4, http://zenodo.org/record/6258051
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14183710
title: TABLE 1 in A new blind genus of Anurophorinae (Collembola: Isotomidae) with seven anal spines from Northwest China

description: TABLE 1. Number of anal spines in spined genera of Anurophorinae with Abd. IV and V separated (the genera are listed in ascending order of the number of spines)
GenusAbd. IVAbd. VAbd. VITotal numberMartynovella Deharveng, 19780202Sahacanthella Potapov & Stebaeva, 19931*202Uzelia Absolon, 19010202Yosiiella Hüther, 19670224Dimorphocanthella Potapov, Bu, Huang, Gao & Luan, 20100404Sibiracanthella Potapov & Stebaeva, 19930404Tetracanthella Schött, 18910404Blissia Rusek, 1985 (B.glabra Rusek, 1985)0404Tuvia Grinbergs, 19620235Pentacanthella Deharveng, 19780415Blissia Rusek, 1985 (B. robusta Fjellberg & Potapov, 1998)2406Heptacanthella new genus0437Tiancanthella Rusek, 19790808Octodontophora Tshelnokov, 19900819
* 1 medial conical protuberance in Sahacanthella
description: Published as part of Gao, Yan, Potapov, Mikhail & Bu, Yun, 2022, A new blind genus of Anurophorinae (Collembola: Isotomidae) with seven anal spines from Northwest China, pp. 81 in Zootaxa 5104 (1) on page 81, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5104.1.4, http://zenodo.org/record/6258051
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14183713
title: TABLE 1. Morphological differences between M. bicolor, M. erectus, M. nitidus and D in Macropsychanthus nitidus: a new rank and combination for dioclea rostrata var. nitida (leguminosae, papilionoideae)

description: TABLE 1. Morphological differences between M. bicolor, M. erectus, M. nitidus and D. rostrata.
CharacterM. bicolorM. erectusM. nitidusDioclea rostrataLeaf rachis length (mm)20–30to 55–203StipelsAbsentAbstentAbsentPresentIndumentum of the leaflet undersurfaceGlabrous to sericeous, sometimes brightSericeous argenteousSericeus argenteousSericeous brownLeaflet shapeElliptical to ovateElliptical to obovateElliptical to ovateElliptical to ovateFlower length (cm)1.0–2.31.8–2.41.0–1.51.8–2.0Standard petal length (cm)0.8–1.51.8–2.31–1.61.0–2.0Wing petals length (cm)1–21.8–2.51.0–1.51.5– 1.8Keel petals apexAcuminateAcuminateAcuminateRoundedKeel petals length (cm)0.8–1.31.8–2.20.8–1.21.2–1.3
description: Published as part of Fonseca-Cortés, Andrés, Snak, Cristiane & Queiroz, Luciano Paganucci De, 2023, Macropsychanthus nitidus: a new rank and combination for dioclea rostrata var. nitida (leguminosae, papilionoideae), pp. 297 in Phytotaxa 619 (4) on page 297, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.619.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/8430575
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14183712
title: TABLE 1. Morphological differences between M. bicolor, M. erectus, M. nitidus and D in Macropsychanthus nitidus: a new rank and combination for dioclea rostrata var. nitida (leguminosae, papilionoideae)

description: TABLE 1. Morphological differences between M. bicolor, M. erectus, M. nitidus and D. rostrata.
CharacterM. bicolorM. erectusM. nitidusDioclea rostrataLeaf rachis length (mm)20–30to 55–203StipelsAbsentAbstentAbsentPresentIndumentum of the leaflet undersurfaceGlabrous to sericeous, sometimes brightSericeous argenteousSericeus argenteousSericeous brownLeaflet shapeElliptical to ovateElliptical to obovateElliptical to ovateElliptical to ovateFlower length (cm)1.0–2.31.8–2.41.0–1.51.8–2.0Standard petal length (cm)0.8–1.51.8–2.31–1.61.0–2.0Wing petals length (cm)1–21.8–2.51.0–1.51.5– 1.8Keel petals apexAcuminateAcuminateAcuminateRoundedKeel petals length (cm)0.8–1.31.8–2.20.8–1.21.2–1.3
description: Published as part of Fonseca-Cortés, Andrés, Snak, Cristiane & Queiroz, Luciano Paganucci De, 2023, Macropsychanthus nitidus: a new rank and combination for dioclea rostrata var. nitida (leguminosae, papilionoideae), pp. 297 in Phytotaxa 619 (4) on page 297, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.619.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/8430575
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14183714
title: TABLE 1 in Two new species of the codling fish genus Physiculus from Lakshadweep, India (Gadiformes: Moridae)

description: TABLE 1. Morphometric and meristic data of Physiculus indicus sp. nov. and Physiculus lakshadeepa sp. nov.
P. indicusP. lakshadeepaMorphometric MeasurementHolotypeAll typesHolotypeAll typesTotal length (mm)183183 (149‒183)192192 (143‒224)Standard length (mm)16216­2 (128‒16­2)16416­4 (125‒183)First dorsal rays99 (8‒9)99 (8‒9)Second dorsal rays5757 (56­‒6­0)5959 (51‒59)Pelvic soft rays7777Pectoral fin rays2222 (14‒22)1818 (14+‒18)Caudal fin rays1919 (17‒24)1414 (14‒22)Anal soft rays606­0 (55‒6­0)5656­ (53‒59)scales in longitudinal series9696­ (90‒102)9090 (84‒95)Scales between first dorsal-fin base and lateral line77 (7‒8)77 (6­‒7)Gill rakers4+913 (12‒13)5+1214 (14‒17)Total vertebrae52524949Precaudal vertebrae1212 (11‒12)1212 (11‒12)Caudal vertebrae4040 (40‒41)3737 (37‒38)in % SLMean (Range)SDMean (Range)SDBody depth22.820.7 (18.0‒22.8)1.821.520.2 (19.3‒21.5)1.1Caudal peduncle depth1.82.1 (1.8‒2.5)0.32.32.2 (1.5‒2.7)0.6Head length25.125.7 (24.8‒27.7)1.224.324.3 (23.0‒25.5)1.3Head width18.418.0 (16­.2‒19.8)1.415.816­.1 (15.8‒16­.5)0.4Predorsal length27.828 (26­.1‒29.8)1.329.129.3 (28.2‒30.5)1.2Pre-pectoral length23.026­.9 (23.0‒29.4)2.626.728.1 (26­.7‒30.5)2.1Pre-pelvic length16.920.7 (16­.9‒22.9)2.321.119.8 (16­.6­‒21.6­)2.8Pre-anal fin length27.531.7 (27.5‒34.2)2.532.632.4 (31.6­‒33.2)0.8Pre anus length21.627.4 (21.6­‒30.4)3.430.829.5 (26­.9‒30.8)2.2First dorsal fin height6.38.2 (6­.3‒9.7)1.59.69.4 (9.2‒9.6­)0.3First dorsal fin base length6.57.7 (6­.5‒9.0)0.96.56­.8 (6­.5‒7.1)0.3Pectoral fin length17.818.4 (15.7‒20.8)2.117.117.5 (16­.9‒18.5)0.9Pelvic fin length19.218.3 (17.0‒19.2)1.221.520.2 (18.9‒21.5)1.8in % HLOrbital diameter22.222.9 (19.0‒25.8)2.624.724.1 (19.1‒28.5)4.7Snout length19.923.4 (19.9‒28.4)3.524.725.3 (24.7‒25.9)0.6Maxilla length51.848.8 (44.9‒51.8)3.350.351.2 (48.3‒54.9)3.4Bony inter orbital width31.829.8 (26­.6­‒34.1)3.130.128.7 (25.4‒30.7)2.9Barbel length4.76­.1 (3.2‒8.9)2.57.57.4 (3.2‒11.6­)4.2First dorsal fin height25.132.5 (25.1‒39.1)5.862.857.2 (51.7‒6­2.8)7.8Caudal peduncle length8.89.4 (8.4‒10.3)0.817.118.1 (17.1‒19.7)1.4%InV‒afLoD11.49.5 (6­.4‒12.0)2.96.07.6­ (6­.0‒9.6­)1.8InV‒Lo22.623.3 (18.6­‒29.0)3.729.026­.8 (24.4‒29.0)2.3Lo‒An17.621.3 (17.6­‒23.8)2.922.619.7 (17.4‒22.6­)2.6InV‒An53.653.9 (50.6­‒58.2)3.558.251.4 (41.7‒58.2)8.7
description: Published as part of Idrees Babu, K. K., Ho, Hsaun-Ching, Mariyambi, P. C. & Sureshkumar, S., 2022, Two new species of the codling fish genus Physiculus from Lakshadweep, India (Gadiformes: Moridae), pp. 119 in Zootaxa 5104 (1) on page 119, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5104.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/6258095
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14183715
title: TABLE 1 in Two new species of the codling fish genus Physiculus from Lakshadweep, India (Gadiformes: Moridae)

description: TABLE 1. Morphometric and meristic data of Physiculus indicus sp. nov. and Physiculus lakshadeepa sp. nov.
P. indicusP. lakshadeepaMorphometric MeasurementHolotypeAll typesHolotypeAll typesTotal length (mm)183183 (149‒183)192192 (143‒224)Standard length (mm)16216­2 (128‒16­2)16416­4 (125‒183)First dorsal rays99 (8‒9)99 (8‒9)Second dorsal rays5757 (56­‒6­0)5959 (51‒59)Pelvic soft rays7777Pectoral fin rays2222 (14‒22)1818 (14+‒18)Caudal fin rays1919 (17‒24)1414 (14‒22)Anal soft rays606­0 (55‒6­0)5656­ (53‒59)scales in longitudinal series9696­ (90‒102)9090 (84‒95)Scales between first dorsal-fin base and lateral line77 (7‒8)77 (6­‒7)Gill rakers4+913 (12‒13)5+1214 (14‒17)Total vertebrae52524949Precaudal vertebrae1212 (11‒12)1212 (11‒12)Caudal vertebrae4040 (40‒41)3737 (37‒38)in % SLMean (Range)SDMean (Range)SDBody depth22.820.7 (18.0‒22.8)1.821.520.2 (19.3‒21.5)1.1Caudal peduncle depth1.82.1 (1.8‒2.5)0.32.32.2 (1.5‒2.7)0.6Head length25.125.7 (24.8‒27.7)1.224.324.3 (23.0‒25.5)1.3Head width18.418.0 (16­.2‒19.8)1.415.816­.1 (15.8‒16­.5)0.4Predorsal length27.828 (26­.1‒29.8)1.329.129.3 (28.2‒30.5)1.2Pre-pectoral length23.026­.9 (23.0‒29.4)2.626.728.1 (26­.7‒30.5)2.1Pre-pelvic length16.920.7 (16­.9‒22.9)2.321.119.8 (16­.6­‒21.6­)2.8Pre-anal fin length27.531.7 (27.5‒34.2)2.532.632.4 (31.6­‒33.2)0.8Pre anus length21.627.4 (21.6­‒30.4)3.430.829.5 (26­.9‒30.8)2.2First dorsal fin height6.38.2 (6­.3‒9.7)1.59.69.4 (9.2‒9.6­)0.3First dorsal fin base length6.57.7 (6­.5‒9.0)0.96.56­.8 (6­.5‒7.1)0.3Pectoral fin length17.818.4 (15.7‒20.8)2.117.117.5 (16­.9‒18.5)0.9Pelvic fin length19.218.3 (17.0‒19.2)1.221.520.2 (18.9‒21.5)1.8in % HLOrbital diameter22.222.9 (19.0‒25.8)2.624.724.1 (19.1‒28.5)4.7Snout length19.923.4 (19.9‒28.4)3.524.725.3 (24.7‒25.9)0.6Maxilla length51.848.8 (44.9‒51.8)3.350.351.2 (48.3‒54.9)3.4Bony inter orbital width31.829.8 (26­.6­‒34.1)3.130.128.7 (25.4‒30.7)2.9Barbel length4.76­.1 (3.2‒8.9)2.57.57.4 (3.2‒11.6­)4.2First dorsal fin height25.132.5 (25.1‒39.1)5.862.857.2 (51.7‒6­2.8)7.8Caudal peduncle length8.89.4 (8.4‒10.3)0.817.118.1 (17.1‒19.7)1.4%InV‒afLoD11.49.5 (6­.4‒12.0)2.96.07.6­ (6­.0‒9.6­)1.8InV‒Lo22.623.3 (18.6­‒29.0)3.729.026­.8 (24.4‒29.0)2.3Lo‒An17.621.3 (17.6­‒23.8)2.922.619.7 (17.4‒22.6­)2.6InV‒An53.653.9 (50.6­‒58.2)3.558.251.4 (41.7‒58.2)8.7
description: Published as part of Idrees Babu, K. K., Ho, Hsaun-Ching, Mariyambi, P. C. & Sureshkumar, S., 2022, Two new species of the codling fish genus Physiculus from Lakshadweep, India (Gadiformes: Moridae), pp. 119 in Zootaxa 5104 (1) on page 119, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5104.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/6258095
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14183718
title: TABLE 2 in Two new species of the codling fish genus Physiculus from Lakshadweep, India (Gadiformes: Moridae)

description: TABLE 2. Comparison of the new species with their Indian Ocean congeners and two closely similar species from western Pacific Ocean. Those cells with overlapped values of new species are shaded in gray. Data sources: A: this study. B. Shcherbachev (1993). C. Paulin (1989).
TaxonInV-LO/LO/ScalePelvic-Dorsal-Anal-Pectoral-VertebraeGill1stOther charactersDataInV-af (%)InV-af (%)seriesfin raysfin raysfin raysfin raysrakersDorsal-finsources(2 nd)height(% HL)P. indicus18.6­‒29.06­.4‒12.090‒102756­‒6­055‒6­0~225212‒1325.1‒39.1Teeth equal in size;Asp. nov.snout scaled
P. lakshadeepa 24.4‒29.0 6­.0‒9.6­ 84‒95 7 51‒59 53‒59 ~18 49 14‒17 51.7‒6­2.8 Teeth equal in size; A sp. nov. snout scaled
P. capensis 19.0‒19.7 15.1‒15.8 98‒110 7 54‒57 6­0‒6­2 26­‒28 49‒50 12‒13 53.5‒6­1.6­ Jaw teeth in a B 20.4‒30.6­ 5.4‒10.0 105‒110 53‒6­2 58‒6­5 24‒25 48‒51 2‒3+9 graded series; snout C
naked.
P. andriashevi 21.0‒28.4 11.9‒18.2 124‒140 5 72‒80 73‒80 21‒23 59‒6­0 13‒18 26­.7‒38.1 B
P. rhodopinnis 24.3‒26­.7 11.2‒16­.4 120‒130 5 71‒76­ 76­‒79 23 57‒58 11‒14 34.9‒36­.3 B (Indo-W Pacific) 21.3‒27.2 10.1‒15.9 120‒140 6­8‒76­ 70‒80 53‒56­ 3‒4+7‒12 C
P. argyropastus 31.7‒41.7 9.2‒14.1 93‒99 6­‒7 55‒6­1 6­0‒6­7 21‒24 50‒54 14‒19 33.1‒51.1 B
23.0‒36­.0 4.6­‒9.8 ca. 56­‒6­0 58‒6­5 53‒56­ 2‒3+9‒11 C
90‒95
P. marisrubri 31.4‒38.0 12.9‒15.2 75‒80 5 58‒6­3 6­2‒6­8 21‒25 52‒53 22‒24 41.8‒44.6­ B
32.9‒36­.9 8.0‒8.9 ca. 80 58‒6­3 6­3‒6­8 55 5+12‒14 C
P. normani 39.0‒39.1 7.6­‒11.0 86­‒97 5 59‒6­6­ 6­4‒70 23‒24 50‒53 10‒12 30.4 Jaw teeth in a B 34.9‒38.2 7.1‒9.4 86­‒95 6­0‒6­3 6­7‒70 51 2‒3+8‒9 graded series; snout C
naked
P. nielseni 39.1 10.80 105 5 6­5+ 6­4+ 24 48+ 12‒14 30.5 Snout naked B
P. fedorovi [‒8.5] 25.7 126 7 62 68 23‒24 52 10‒11 35.1 B
P. dalwigkii 0.0‒2.4 17.5‒20.0 119‒126­ 6­3‒6­8 6­6­‒75 / 52‒55 2‒3+7‒9 Jaw teeth in a C 7.0‒9.4 14.4‒24.5 127‒135 5 6­4‒6­5 6­8‒71 24‒26­ 56 10‒13 39.4‒40.6­ graded series B
......continued on the next page
description: Published as part of Idrees Babu, K. K., Ho, Hsaun-Ching, Mariyambi, P. C. & Sureshkumar, S., 2022, Two new species of the codling fish genus Physiculus from Lakshadweep, India (Gadiformes: Moridae), pp. 121 in Zootaxa 5104 (1) on page 121, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5104.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/6258095
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14183717
title: TABLE 2 in Two new species of the codling fish genus Physiculus from Lakshadweep, India (Gadiformes: Moridae)

description: TABLE 2. Comparison of the new species with their Indian Ocean congeners and two closely similar species from western Pacific Ocean. Those cells with overlapped values of new species are shaded in gray. Data sources: A: this study. B. Shcherbachev (1993). C. Paulin (1989).
TaxonInV-LO/LO/ScalePelvic-Dorsal-Anal-Pectoral-VertebraeGill1stOther charactersDataInV-af (%)InV-af (%)seriesfin raysfin raysfin raysfin raysrakersDorsal-finsources(2 nd)height(% HL)P. indicus18.6­‒29.06­.4‒12.090‒102756­‒6­055‒6­0~225212‒1325.1‒39.1Teeth equal in size;Asp. nov.snout scaled
P. lakshadeepa 24.4‒29.0 6­.0‒9.6­ 84‒95 7 51‒59 53‒59 ~18 49 14‒17 51.7‒6­2.8 Teeth equal in size; A sp. nov. snout scaled
P. capensis 19.0‒19.7 15.1‒15.8 98‒110 7 54‒57 6­0‒6­2 26­‒28 49‒50 12‒13 53.5‒6­1.6­ Jaw teeth in a B 20.4‒30.6­ 5.4‒10.0 105‒110 53‒6­2 58‒6­5 24‒25 48‒51 2‒3+9 graded series; snout C
naked.
P. andriashevi 21.0‒28.4 11.9‒18.2 124‒140 5 72‒80 73‒80 21‒23 59‒6­0 13‒18 26­.7‒38.1 B
P. rhodopinnis 24.3‒26­.7 11.2‒16­.4 120‒130 5 71‒76­ 76­‒79 23 57‒58 11‒14 34.9‒36­.3 B (Indo-W Pacific) 21.3‒27.2 10.1‒15.9 120‒140 6­8‒76­ 70‒80 53‒56­ 3‒4+7‒12 C
P. argyropastus 31.7‒41.7 9.2‒14.1 93‒99 6­‒7 55‒6­1 6­0‒6­7 21‒24 50‒54 14‒19 33.1‒51.1 B
23.0‒36­.0 4.6­‒9.8 ca. 56­‒6­0 58‒6­5 53‒56­ 2‒3+9‒11 C
90‒95
P. marisrubri 31.4‒38.0 12.9‒15.2 75‒80 5 58‒6­3 6­2‒6­8 21‒25 52‒53 22‒24 41.8‒44.6­ B
32.9‒36­.9 8.0‒8.9 ca. 80 58‒6­3 6­3‒6­8 55 5+12‒14 C
P. normani 39.0‒39.1 7.6­‒11.0 86­‒97 5 59‒6­6­ 6­4‒70 23‒24 50‒53 10‒12 30.4 Jaw teeth in a B 34.9‒38.2 7.1‒9.4 86­‒95 6­0‒6­3 6­7‒70 51 2‒3+8‒9 graded series; snout C
naked
P. nielseni 39.1 10.80 105 5 6­5+ 6­4+ 24 48+ 12‒14 30.5 Snout naked B
P. fedorovi [‒8.5] 25.7 126 7 62 68 23‒24 52 10‒11 35.1 B
P. dalwigkii 0.0‒2.4 17.5‒20.0 119‒126­ 6­3‒6­8 6­6­‒75 / 52‒55 2‒3+7‒9 Jaw teeth in a C 7.0‒9.4 14.4‒24.5 127‒135 5 6­4‒6­5 6­8‒71 24‒26­ 56 10‒13 39.4‒40.6­ graded series B
......continued on the next page
description: Published as part of Idrees Babu, K. K., Ho, Hsaun-Ching, Mariyambi, P. C. & Sureshkumar, S., 2022, Two new species of the codling fish genus Physiculus from Lakshadweep, India (Gadiformes: Moridae), pp. 121 in Zootaxa 5104 (1) on page 121, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5104.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/6258095
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14183722
title: TABLE 3 in Deep-sea Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) collected during the TALUD cruises in western Mexico

description: TABLE 3. Unproven, doubtful, and invalid records of Ophiuroidea for the Mexican deep-sea Pacific.
SpeciesStatusReferencesAmphiodia occidentalis (Lyman, 1860)DoubtfulMaluf 1988; Hendrickx 2012a; Solís-Marín et al. 2014Amphiodia periercta H.L. Clark, 1911InvalidMaluf 1988; Hendrickx 2012a; Solís-Marín et al. 2014; Granja-Fernández et al. 2015Amphipholis squamata (Delle Chiaje, 1828)InvalidMaluf 1988; Hendrickx 2012a; Solís-Marín et al. 2013; Solís-Marín et al. 2014Microphiopholis puntarenae (Lütken, 1856)InvalidMaluf 1988; Hendrickx 2012a; Solís-Marín et al. 2013; Solís-Marín et al. 2014Ophiacantha adiaphora H.L. Clark, 1911UnprovenMaluf 1988; Hendrickx 2012a; Solís-Marín et al. 2014Ophiacantha sentosa Lyman, 1878UnprovenMaluf 1988; Hendrickx 2012a; Solís-Marín et al. 2013, 2014; Granja-Fernández et al. 2015Ophionereis eurybrachiplax H.L. Clark, 1911InvalidMaluf 1988; Hendrickx 2012a; Solís-Marín et al. 2014Ophiopholis kennerlyi Lyman, 1860UnprovenHendrickx 2012a; Solís-Marín et al. 2014; Granja-Fernández et al. 2015Ophiura sarsii Lütken, 1855InvalidMaluf 1988; Hendrickx 2012a; Solís-Marín et al. 2014; Granja-Fernández et al. 2015
description: Published as part of Granja-Fernández, Rebeca, Hendrickx, Michel E., Rangel-Solís, Pedro Diego & López-Pérez, Andrés, 2023, Deep-sea Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) collected during the TALUD cruises in western Mexico, pp. 63 in Zootaxa 5259 (1) on page 63, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5259.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/7794984
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14183721
title: TABLE 3 in Deep-sea Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) collected during the TALUD cruises in western Mexico

description: TABLE 3. Unproven, doubtful, and invalid records of Ophiuroidea for the Mexican deep-sea Pacific.
SpeciesStatusReferencesAmphiodia occidentalis (Lyman, 1860)DoubtfulMaluf 1988; Hendrickx 2012a; Solís-Marín et al. 2014Amphiodia periercta H.L. Clark, 1911InvalidMaluf 1988; Hendrickx 2012a; Solís-Marín et al. 2014; Granja-Fernández et al. 2015Amphipholis squamata (Delle Chiaje, 1828)InvalidMaluf 1988; Hendrickx 2012a; Solís-Marín et al. 2013; Solís-Marín et al. 2014Microphiopholis puntarenae (Lütken, 1856)InvalidMaluf 1988; Hendrickx 2012a; Solís-Marín et al. 2013; Solís-Marín et al. 2014Ophiacantha adiaphora H.L. Clark, 1911UnprovenMaluf 1988; Hendrickx 2012a; Solís-Marín et al. 2014Ophiacantha sentosa Lyman, 1878UnprovenMaluf 1988; Hendrickx 2012a; Solís-Marín et al. 2013, 2014; Granja-Fernández et al. 2015Ophionereis eurybrachiplax H.L. Clark, 1911InvalidMaluf 1988; Hendrickx 2012a; Solís-Marín et al. 2014Ophiopholis kennerlyi Lyman, 1860UnprovenHendrickx 2012a; Solís-Marín et al. 2014; Granja-Fernández et al. 2015Ophiura sarsii Lütken, 1855InvalidMaluf 1988; Hendrickx 2012a; Solís-Marín et al. 2014; Granja-Fernández et al. 2015
description: Published as part of Granja-Fernández, Rebeca, Hendrickx, Michel E., Rangel-Solís, Pedro Diego & López-Pérez, Andrés, 2023, Deep-sea Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) collected during the TALUD cruises in western Mexico, pp. 63 in Zootaxa 5259 (1) on page 63, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5259.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/7794984