cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr07363.v1
title: Carnegie Commission National Survey of Higher Education: Graduate Study Subsample, 1969
title: Version 1

description: This study provides data obtained from one-fourth of a randomly drawn national sample of graduate students surveyed under the sponsorship of the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education (see CARNEGIE COMMISSION NATIONAL SURVEY OF HIGHER EDUCATION: GRADUATE STUDY, 1969 [ICPSR 7502]). The original data were collected at the Survey Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, while the subsample was provided by the Social Science Data Center at the University of Connecticut. Questions elicited information regarding respondents' social and educational backgrounds, their degree and career plans, and their opinions on their institutions and departments, educational policy in general, and a wide range of social and political issues. Demographic variables cover age, sex, race, religion, marital status, family income, citizenship, and parents' levels of education and occupations.
description: Datasets: 
 
 DS0: Study-Level Files 
 DS1: Dataset 
 DS2: Technical Report
description: Frequency counts in the codebook are for the full sample (see ICPSR 7502), not the subsample used in this study.
description: Graduate students at American institutions of higher education.
description: The sample used in this study represents one-fourth, randomly selected, of the entire sample from the Carnegie Commission's graduate students survey (see ICPSR 7502).
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr07909.v1
title: Massachusetts Statewide Criminal Justice Guidelines Evaluation, 1979: Sentencing Data
title: Version 1

description: This data collection is the result of a project established to study the development, implementation, and use of statewide sentencing guidelines and to report on the perceptions of criminal justice system personnel and inmates regarding those guidelines. Funded by the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, the project was carried out by the Rutgers University School of Criminal Justice from October 1978 to June 1981. Additional data produced by this project are contained in two other studies held by ICPSR: NEW JERSEY STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE GUIDELINES EVALUATION, 1979 (ICPSR 7910) and NEW JERSEY STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE GUIDELINES EVALUATION, 1980: INMATE SURVEY DATA (ICPSR 7911). The Massachusetts Sentencing Data contains information on a random sample of 1,440 convicted defendants sentenced in the Massachusetts Superior Court between November 1977 and October 1978. The sample represents approximately one-third of the actual number of defendants sentenced in the Massachusetts Superior Court during a one-year period. The cases were selected and coded by the Massachusetts Sentencing Guidelines project during 1979. Variables include information about each defendant's juvenile and adult criminal history, characteristics of the current offense, and the elements of the disposition of the current offense. Demographic data include defendant's age, sex, race, marital status, employment status, occupation, income, number of children, educational attainment, and drug and alcohol use history.
description: Datasets: 
 
 DS1: Dataset
description: Defendants sentenced in the Massachusetts Superior Court during 1979.
description: Defendants in 10 of 14 Massachusetts counties. Approximately 20 percent of these cases were excluded from the sample due to insufficient information in their records.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr07910.v1
title: New Jersey Statewide Criminal Justice Guidelines Evaluation, 1979
title: Version 1

description: This data collection is the result of a project established to study the development, implementation, and use of statewide sentencing guidelines and to report the perceptions of criminal justice system personnel and inmates regarding those guidelines. Funded by the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, the project was carried out by the Rutgers University School of Criminal Justice from October 1978 to June 1981. Additional data produced by this project are contained in two other studies held by ICPSR: MASSACHUSETTS STATEWIDE STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE GUIDELINES EVALUATION, 1979: SENTENCTING DATA (ICPSR 7909) and NEW JERSEY STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE GUIDELINES EVALUATION, 1980: INMATE SURVEY DATA (ICPSR 7911). The data in this study is contained in two files. It consists of interviews to determine the opinions of inmates about the relative seriousness of offenses, severity of punishments, appropriateness of penalties for various kinds of crimes, and the use of sentencing guidelines to structure judicial sentencing decisions. Part 1, Inmate Background Data, contains socioeconomic, residential, and current and prior criminal history information in a random sample of 226 Rahway, New Jersey, State Prison inmates. Background information was collected for all of the inmates selected to participate in the 1979 New Jersey inmate survey. However, not all of those inmates selected agreed to be interviewed when the actual survey was conducted. Therefore, Part 1 includes information on survey respondents and nonrespondents. Part 2, Inmate Survey Data, contains information on 146 inmates. Frequency distributions and the survey instrument are included in the documentation.
description: Datasets: 
 
 DS0: Study-Level Files 
 DS1: Inmate Background Data 
 DS2: Inmate Survey Data
description: Rahway, New Jersey, State Prison inmates in 1979.
description: The sample was obtained by dividing inmates in either minimum and maximum/medium security status, and then randomly sampling within these two frames, selecting a higher proportion of inmates under minimum security to compensate for their relative rarity.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr08381.v1
title: Crime on Campus, 1978-1979: A Survey of 150 College Campuses and Cities
title: Version 1

description: This data collection provides information on crime on 150 selected college campuses and cities in the United States in the period 1978-1979. The collection covers violent crime and property crime on campus and in cities, and the number and sex of police officers assigned to campus duty and in cities. Aggregate socioeconomic information for campuses includes the amount of financial aid received, while information for cities includes the percentage of residents who were unemployed or below poverty level, female labor force participation, and household activity ratio. Campus demographic variables itemize the percentage of males and females residing on campus, percentage of Blacks attending school, number of foreign students, student-faculty ratio, total number of students on campus, students per acre, and students per 1,000 city residents. Aggregate demographic variables for cities are provided on total population, percentage of residents aged 15-19 or 20-24 years old, total number of households, number of single mother-headed households, and percentage of Blacks in the city.
description: ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Standardized missing values.; Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes..
description: Datasets: 
 
 DS1: Dataset
description: All college campuses in the United States.
description: The data consist of an initial sample of 150 college campuses and cities that reported their crime rates to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reports in 1978.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr06266.v1
title: Center for Research on Social Reality [Spain] Survey, January 1993: Supranational Identification
title: Version 1

description: This data collection is part of a continuing series of semi-monthly surveys of individuals in Spain. Each survey consists of three sections. The first section collects information on respondents' attitudes regarding personal and national issues. This section includes questions on level of life satisfaction and frequency of relationships, as well as a rating of the importance of national issues. The second section varies according to the monthly topic, with this month's topic focusing on supranational identification. Among the issues investigated are frequency of respondent's exposure to international news, feelings toward individual countries or blocks of countries, perception of level of economic development and democratic political institutions in different world regions, evaluation of present relations between Spain and Latin America, attitude toward the European Community, perceived benefits of Spanish membership in the European Community, and respondent's sense of pride in being Spanish and belonging to an autonomous community. The third section collects demographic data such as sex, age, religion, income, and place of residence.
description: Datasets: 
 
 DS0: Study-Level Files 
 DS1: Main Data File 
 DS2: Frequencies
description: Center for Research on Social Reality [Spain] Survey Series
description: Values containing decimal points have actual periods in the data. The codebook for this collection is partially in Spanish.
description: Persons aged 18 and over living in Spain.
description: Random sample, stratified by autonomous regions and municipalities according to their size.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr06267.v1
title: Center for Research on Social Reality [Spain] Survey, March 1993: Attitudes Toward Immigrants
title: Version 1

description: This data collection is part of a continuing series of semi-monthly surveys of individuals in Spain. Each survey consists of three sections. The first section collects information on respondents' attitudes regarding personal and national issues. This section includes questions on level of life satisfaction and frequency of relationships, as well as a rating of the importance of national issues. The second section varies according to the monthly topic, with this month's topic focusing on attitudes toward immigrants. Among the issues investigated are attitudes toward persons from different social groups, perceived attitudes of relatives and friends toward different social groups, opinions of the immigration quota system established by the European Community, perceived reasons for migration, perceived influence of immigration on unemployment and crime, friendship and work relationships with persons of different social groups, evaluation of immigrants from developed countries, and evaluation of the economic development and modernization of Spain compared to that of the rest of Europe. The third section collects demographic data such as sex, age, religion, income, and place of residence.
description: Datasets: 
 
 DS0: Study-Level Files 
 DS1: Main Data File 
 DS2: Frequencies
description: Center for Research on Social Reality [Spain] Survey Series
description: Values containing decimal points have actual periods in the data. The codebook for this collection is partially in Spanish.
description: Persons aged 18 and over living in Spain.
description: Random sample, stratified by autonomous regions and municipalities according to their size.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr06268.v1
title: Center for Research on Social Reality [Spain] Survey, February 1993: Family and the Use of Time
title: Version 1

description: This data collection is part of a continuing series of semi-monthly surveys of individuals in Spain. Each survey consists of three sections. The first section collects information on respondents' attitudes regarding personal and national issues. This section includes questions on level of life satisfaction and frequency of relationships, as well as a rating of the importance of national issues. The second section varies according to the monthly topic, with this month's topic focusing on family and the use of time. Among the issues investigated are family structure and household composition, the allocation of time toward different activities during weekdays and weekends, time spent on domestic chores and transportation, the allocation of free time, and the level of satisfaction with family life. The third section collects demographic data such as sex, age, religion, income, and place of residence.
description: Datasets: 
 
 DS0: Study-Level Files 
 DS1: Main Data File 
 DS2: Frequencies
description: Center for Research on Social Reality [Spain] Survey Series
description: Values containing decimal points have actual periods in the data. The codebook for this collection is partially in Spanish.
description: Persons aged 18 and over living in Spain.
description: Random sample, stratified by autonomous regions and municipalities according to their size.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr07365.v1
title: Comparative Judicial Study: Switzerland and South Africa, 1970-1971
title: Version 1

description: This study contains eight files of data on the effects of background training and socialization, and attitudes on court decisions of judges in the highest courts in Switzerland and the Republic of South Africa in the period 1970-1971. The study is a collection of several different integrated datasets, designed to facilitate crosscultural and subcultural anthropological, sociological, psychological, and legal analyses of the political behavior and performances of judges in these two nations. The two nations were selected because of the direct representation of subcultures in their court systems, and because of the putative vast differences in their ecological settings. The datasets were collected by the use of several different methods. The primary method was field survey research, with one- to two-hour interviews. The interview consisted of three major parts: background characteristics, open-ended questions dealing with the decision-making process of the courts, and a 72-item attitudinal inventory. The second method used was direct observation of social interaction during the decision-making process, which was only possible in Switzerland. A total of almost two hundred decisions were observed over a period of several months. The third method was not invoked until substantially later. This consisted of analysis and coding of the reported decisions of the Swiss and South African courts, in each instance for a three-year period: the year before and the year after, as well as the year during which the six months of field survey was undertaken (July-December, 1970, for Switzerland, and January-June, 1971, for South Africa). Swiss and South African respondents were asked questions about the decision-making process of the Tribunal in Switzerland, and the putative effects of cultural differences on judicial performance in South Africa. Open-ended questions probed the effects of different background legal training, cultural upbringing, and religious orientation on the judges' court decisions and on public policy issues that were presented to the courts. Also examined were respondents' political, social, economic, and psychological attitudes. Demographic items provide background characteristics of respondents, such as age, date and place of birth, religion, education, job status, political experience and party affiliation, and native tongue.
description: Datasets: 
 
 DS0: Study-Level Files 
 DS1: SW110 File 
 DS2: SA110 File 
 DS3: SW210 File 
 DS4: SA210 File 
 DS5: SA320 File 
 DS6: SW320 File 
 DS7: SW421 File 
 DS8: SW422 File
description: High Courts and judges and judicial assistants in Switzerland and South Africa in the period 1970-1971.
description: A total of 24 judges and 17 judicial assistants of the Federal tribunal in Lausanne, Switzerland, and 47 judges of the Supreme Court in South Africa, in the period 1970-1971.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr07366.v1
title: Swedish National Election Study, 1960
title: Version 1

description: The Swedish Election Study, 1960, was conducted by the Institute of Political Science, the University of Goteborg, Sweden, as part of a political behavior research program that studied Riksdag (parliamentary) elections in the period 1956-1970. This study carried out an electorate survey in two stages with two different subsamples. Respondents in Subsample A were interviewed before the election, and were asked to complete a short mail-in questionnaire after the election. Subsample B was only interviewed in the weeks immediately following the election. Information was gathered about the respondents' communities, their position and mobility within those communities, and their exposure to the information media (television, local and national newspapers, radio, magazines, and political pamphlets). Respondents were also asked to rate their interest in various topics such as crime, political news, international news, sports, editorials, and economics, and to relate their opinions on the media and these topics to the 1960 election. Questions also probed respondents' reactions to existing political issues and to the government's related policies. Demographic data include sex, marital status, year of marriage, year of birth, income, spouse's income, and family income.
description: Datasets: 
 
 DS1: Dataset
description: Swedish citizens born during the period 1880-1938 and eligible to vote.
description: Two-stage probability sample drawn from the Swedish Central Bureau of Statistics' sampling framework, consisting of a nationwide net of primary sampling units. Within 70 primary sampling units, names were drawn from population registers using a procedure that excluded persons not eligible to vote. For the purposes of this study, the resulting sample was split into two subsamples of equal size.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr07911.v1
title: New Jersey Statewide Criminal Justice Guidelines Evaluation, 1980: Inmate Survey Data
title: Version 1

description: This data collection is the result of a project established to study the development, implementation, and use of statewide sentencing guidelines and to report the perceptions of criminal justice system personnel and inmates regarding those guidelines. Funded by the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, the project was carried out by the Rutgers University School of Criminal Justice from October 1978 to June 1981. Additional data produced by this project are contained in two other studies held by ICPSR: MASSACHUSETTS STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE GUIDELINES EVALUATION, 1979 (ICPSR 7909) and NEW JERSEY STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE GUIDELINES EVALUATION, 1979 (ICPSR 7910). The data in this study consist of interviews to determine the opinions of inmates about the relative seriousness of offenses, severity of punishments, appropriateness of penalties for various kinds of crimes, and the use of sentencing guidelines to structure judicial sentencing decisions. Frequency distributions and the survey instrument are included in the documentation.
description: Datasets: 
 
 DS1: Dataset
description: Rahway, New Jersey, State Prison inmates in 1980.
description: The sample was obtained by dividing inmates in either minimum and maximum/medium security status, and then randomly sampling within these two frames, selecting a higher proportion of inmates under minimum security to compensate for their relative rarity.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr07912.v1
title: Dutch Parliamentary Election Study, 1981
title: Version 1

description: This study contains electoral data on the political attitudes and behavior of 2,305 Dutch voters in 1981. The fifth in a series of national election studies in the Netherlands, this study was conducted as a three-wave panel focusing on the effects of campaigns and elections on the political attitudes, information systems, opinions, and preferences of the Dutch electorate. Items explored respondents' political knowledge, interest, and participation, as well as their positions on such issues as abortion, women's emancipation, nuclear energy and armaments, differences in income, crime, unemployment, and pollution. Also probed were respondents' perceptions and evaluations of the Dutch political parties, national problems of importance to them, and their satisfaction with the government, as well as their views of the legitimacy of social protest and government reactions, political distrust and cynicism, and religion and society. The first wave, gathered a few months before the start of the election campaign (January-February 1981), includes demographic information on respondents such as age, sex, marital status, occupation, political party identification and membership, membership in labor unions and other organizations, civic participation, education, social class, and religion. The second wave was gathered during the election campaign (April-May 1981), and the third wave was gathered immediately following the election of May 26, 1981 (May-June 1981).
description: The data are not weighted and there are no weight variables in the data.
description: ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Standardized missing values.; Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes..
description: Datasets: 
 
 DS1: Dataset
description: Dutch Parliamentary Election Study (DPES) Series
description: face-to-face interview, self-enumerated questionnaire 
Conducted by Dutch Inter-university Election Study Workgroup (NKO), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
description: Smallest Geographic Unit: province
description: A total of 2,305 eligible voters in households in the Netherlands in 1981. Of the 2,305 respondents interviewed in Wave I, 1,812 were reinterviewed in Wave 2, and 1,620 of those were reinterviewed in Wave 3.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr07914.v1
title: Teaching Faculty in Academe, 1972-1973
title: Version 1

description: This study is a replication of a part of the 1968-1969 survey of college and university faculty conducted by the American Council of Education (ACE) and the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. In order to reflect the many significant changes in American education since the initial study, this reassessment was undertaken during the 1972-1973 academic year. Included in the sample were teaching faculty from 78 universities, 181 four-year colleges, and 42 junior or community colleges, with faculty size ranging from fewer than 20 to approximately 4,500. The data collection includes information on the faculty surveyed, such as work history, number and type of academic degrees, description of current position (e.g., tenure status, hours per week spent teaching, current funders for scholarly work, and number of graduate and undergraduate students enrolled in current courses), work roles (e.g., department chairmanships, faculty-wide appointments, and professional activities, such as consulting work, works published, and memberships in professional associations), current practices and teaching goals, and opinions and attitudes about many aspects of academia (e.g., federal aid for college students, minority hiring practices, and current working conditions). Additional information includes each respondent's single most outstanding professional accomplishment or achievement. Demographic data include age, education, employment, gender, income, race, and marital status.
description: Datasets: 
 
 DS1: Dataset
description: The National Chicano Research Network, located at the Survey Research Center of the Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan, created an OSIRIS dictionary for the collection and made the collection available to ICPSR.
description: Faculty at colleges and universities in the United States.
description: Stratified random sampling was used. The same 301 institutions sampled in the original 1968-1969 survey (which had been arrayed into 35 stratification cells based on institution type, control, level of selectivity, and institutional affluence) were used in this follow-up survey.