cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/irfbuw
title: Evaluation of nasal nitric oxide in Patients with post-acute COVID-19 cough

description: This data is about the comparison of nNO levels in post-acute COVID-19 cough and Chronic cough.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/buwaaf
title: Party Facts – Version 2022

description: Party Facts links datasets on political parties
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/oisvt
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1860, leave to withdraw, SC1/series 231, Petition of Gamaliel S. Beaman

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: For the removal of the statue of Daniel Webster &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858632"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858632&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Princeton &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Nathaniel H. Whiting, Plymouth &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Gamaliel S. Beaman&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Sewall G. Mirick&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Charles H. Keyes&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 105 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 51 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 44 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Other male signatures: 8 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Unidentified signatures: 2 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, legal voters, non-voters, [females], [other males], ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1860, leave to withdraw &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/4elmsu
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 1866
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/jvzhfg
title: Palgrave Communications' editorial board data sharing survey - raw data

description: Raw data from editorial board member survey.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/pn7upo
title: Plandemic tweets

description: Tweets mentioning the term "plandemic" created from January to May 2020.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ir5t2q
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 19,898-9
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/jxdild
title: Passed Acts; St. 1864, c.80, SC1/series 229, Petition of LeBaron Russell

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Incorporation &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25455148"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25455148&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1864-01-27 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Boston &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Charles R. Codman, Suffolk; committee on public charitable institutions &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;LeBaron Russell&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;George Higginson&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Nathaniel G. Chapin&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1864-01-27,1864-01-29 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the Senate on January 27, 1864 and referred to the committee on public charitable institutions and sent for concurrence and received in the House on January 29, 1864 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 3 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 3 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Home for Aged Colored Women &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: St. 1864, c.80, passed March 5, 1864 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ojwxxh
title: FACEBRASIL 24 NOV 2012

description: Revista brasileira, Orlando, Florida
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/bsaarv
title: Replication Data for: Public Support for Economic Sanctions: An Experimental Analysis

description: What are the determinants of public support for the government’s foreign policy? We shed light on this question by using experiments investigating public support for economic sanctions. Our results suggest that individuals are primarily motivated by humanitarian concerns in their decision to support the use of sanctions against a target country. We find that high levels of public pain in the target country are a p
rimary reason to decide against supporting sanctions, and tailored sanctions, which aim to shift damage from the targeted country’s population to its leadership, receive 
more support than comprehensive sanctions. At the same time, policy effectiveness shapes public support, but only indirectly - through individuals’ subjective evaluations, rather than given estimates of policy success. When subjective evaluations of effectiveness are higher, sanctions receive more public support. Recalled effectiveness, on the other hand, has no direct effect on the decision to support the sanction policy.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/pmmp8k
title: Raw Data for Spatial-musical association of response codes without sound

description: Raw data
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/pdxxvf
title: Replication Data for: 'Competing Models'

description: The data and programs replicate tables and figures from "Competing Models", by Montiel Olea, Ortoleva, Pai, and Prat. Please see the README file for additional details.
description: MATLAB, null
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/46q4hf
title: Replication Data for: School Closures Significantly Reduced Arrests of Black and Latinx Urban Youth

description: This code and data provides documentation for the paper "School Closures Significantly Reduced Arrests of Black and Latinx Urban Youth" by Jessica T. Simes, Tori L. Cowger, and Jaquelyn L. Jahn.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/oy4xqt
title: Executive Agreements Database, The United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement

description: KAV 6376 cover memo
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/4dnalh
title: Replication Data for: Fear and Loathing: How Demographic Change Affects Support for Christian Nationalism

description: Replication data for Fear and Loathing in Public Opinion Quarterly
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/knnuyi
title: Clean Water and Infant Health: Evidence from Piped Water Provision in China

description: Codes and data to replicate all results in "Clean Water and Infant Health: Evidence from Piped Water Provision in China." The infant mortality data is confidential. Readme file explains how the final results are generated and how to apply for the confidential data.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/kp0rhf
title: Passed Resolves; Resolves 1913, c.85, SC1/series 228, Petition of Windsor H. Wyman

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Marriage laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25455125"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25455125&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Massachusetts &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Windsor H. Wyman, Abington; committee on social welfare &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Windsor H. Wyman&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1913-01-16,1913-01-30 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on January 16, 1913 and referred to the committee on social welfare and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on January 30, 1913 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: marriage licenses, physical and moral fitness for marriage, degenerates &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Resolves 1913, c.85, passed May 8, 1913 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/cd4wtm
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 80-1418
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/2rbtwh
title: Massachusetts Archives Collection. v.183-Revolution Petitions, 1777-1778. SC1/series 45X, Petition of Benjamin Hall

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Military service &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13909109"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13909109&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1777-09-29 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Medford &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Several names from a committee &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Benjamin Hall&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Stephen Hall&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Richard Hall&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1777-10-10 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Committed on October 10, 1777 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 3 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Committed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 3 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: selectmen of Medford &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: quota, enlistment, Charlestown, bounty, carpenters &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Massachusetts Archives volume 183, pages 182-183 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/a9hizi
title: Roadmap to the Future of Promotion and Tenure

description: The project identified changes--and a roadmap to implement those changes--that
could be made to Promotion & Tenure (P&T) guidelines to enhance recognition of
scholarly works in ways that will promote and support openness, equity, diversity, and
inclusion. The focus was on academic institutions in Maryland and serves as a
model that could be applied to a larger scale investigation.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ks1l9x
title: Passed Resolves; Resolves 1943, c.39, SC1/series 228, Petition of Edmund E. Capodilupo

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Racial discrimination &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25500531"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25500531&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Boston &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Edmund E. Capodilupo, Boston; committee on labor and industries &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Edmund E. Capodilupo&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1943-01-18,1943-01-19 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on January 18, 1943 and referred to the committee on labor and industries and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on January 19, 1943 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: to prohibit discriminatory practices of employment in war production toward qualified persons because of race, creed or color, military, army, includes address, [additional documents include "Report of the Massachusetts Commission on the Employment Problems of Negroes"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Resolves 1943, c.39, passed June 8, 1943 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/jmr70v
title: Replication Data for: Evaluating the impact of Official Development Assistance on ecological environments in agricultural and renewable energy sectors

description: Evaluating the impact of Official Development Assistance on ecological environments in agricultural and renewable energy sectors
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/pgvsxb
title: “It Ain't So Much the Things We Don't Know That Get Us in Trouble. It's the Things We Know that Ain't So” : The Dubious Intellectual Foundations of the Claim that “Hate Speech” Causes Political Violence

description: This file contains examples of prosecutions under hate speech laws.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/pjdp8d
title: Replication Data for: Qualified ratification: Explaining reservations to international human rights treaties, Journal of Legal Studies, 36 (2), 2007, pp. 397-430

description: Data and do-file
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/bwiubr
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 82-1689
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/esqg5s
title: DOCUMENTS AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT POLICY - J. Mark SEMAKULA

description: 1. Purpose
The Uganda National Records and Archives Act, 2001 requires the Baylor College of Medicine Children’s Foundation – Uganda to manage its records in a well-structured record keeping system, and to put the necessary policies and procedures in place to ensure that its record keeping and records management practices comply with the requirements of the Act and records requirements by the Sponsorship office and other Baylor College of Medicine Children’s Foundation - Uganda. 
Information is a resource of the same importance to good management as other standard resources like people, money and facilities. The information resources of Baylor College of Medicine Children’s Foundation – Uganda must therefore be managed as a valuable asset. Appropriate records management is a vital aspect of maintaining and enhancing the value of this asset. Baylor College of Medicine Children’s Foundation – Uganda considers its records to be a valuable asset to: 
enable Baylor College of Medicine Children’s Foundation - Uganda to find the right information easily and comprehensively; 
enable Baylor College of Medicine Children’s Foundation - Uganda to perform its functions successfully and efficiently and in an accountable manner; 
support the business, legal and accountability requirements of Baylor College of Medicine Children’s Foundation - Uganda; 
ensure the conduct of business in an orderly, efficient and accountable manner; 
ensure the consistent delivery of services; 
support and document policy formation and administrative decision-making; 
provide continuity in the event of a disaster; 
protect the interests of Baylor College of Medicine Children’s Foundation - Uganda and the rights of employees, clients and present and future stakeholders; 
support and document Baylor College of Medicine Children’s Foundation - Uganda’s activities, development and achievements; 
 
Records management, through the proper control of the content, storage and volume of records, reduces vulnerability to legal challenge or financial loss and promotes best value in terms of human and space resources through greater co-ordination of information and storage systems.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/dgztwe
title: California Poll: 8802 -- April 6-10, 1988

description: The Field Poll, established in 1945 as The California Poll by Mervin Field, has operated continuously as an independent, non-partisan, media-sponsored public opinion news service. Each year the Field Polls cover a wide range of political and social topics examining California public opinion. Continuing measures are made of voter support for leading political figures vying for major state and federal offices, job ratings of important political figures and reactions to significant political events. Voter awareness, understanding and predispositions of major campaign issues and salient statewide ballot propositions are also tracked over time. For poll 8802 N=1182.
description: Subject: STANDARD DEPOSIT TERMS 1.0 Type: DATAPASS:TERMS:STANDARD:1.0 Notes: The UCLA Social Science Data Archive (“the Archive”) gives permission and any required licenses to Data-PASS to make the Content available for archiving, preservation and access (with permission of the Archive), within the Data Preservation Alliance for the Social Sciences ("Data-PASS") in accordance with the Data-PASS terms (the "Terms") of use (available from: http://www.icpsr.org/Data-PASS). Including permission to: (a) redisseminate copies of the Data Collection in a variety of distribution formats only according to the standard terms of use of the Archive; (b) promote and advertise the Data Collection in any publicity (in any form) for Data-PASS and the Archive; (c) describe, catalog, validate and document the Content; (d) store, translate, copy or re-format the Data Collection in any way to ensure its future preservation and accessibility, improve usability and/or protect respondent confidentiality; (e) incorporate metadata (cataloging information) or documentation regarding this study into public access catalogues. The Archive represents and warrants that the Content conforms to all Terms and that the Archive is lawfully enti
tled and has full authority to license Data-Pass to use the Materials in the ways described in the Terms.;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/isfhnt
title: Wright Files I-Z Edited; Docketed Case: 17353
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/4iqoc
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1839, Docket 10525, SC1/series 231, Petition of Louisa S. Wetherbee

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: To abolish slavery in Washington D.C. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11857946"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11857946&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Boxborough &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Jeremiah Spofford, Essex; committee on the subject &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Louisa S. Wetherbee&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Frances Cross&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Mary Hayward&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1839-01-17,1839-01-17 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the Senate on January 17, 1839 and referred to the committee on the subject and sent for concurrence and received in the House on January 17, 1839 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 64 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 64 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: Yes &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: undersigned, [females], ["women"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1839, Docket 10525 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;