cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.15468/dl.fwztrc
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 3775301 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "TaxonKey is one of (Plantae, Undaria pinnatifida, Lindavia intermedia)",
 "Country is New Zealand",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 "Year is greater than or equal to 0",
 "DecimalLongitude is greater than or equal to -180",
 "DecimalLatitude is greater than or equal to -90",
 {
 "not" : {
 "or" : [
 "Issue is Zero coordinate",
 "Issue is Coordinate out of range",
 "Issue is Country coordinate mismatch"
 ]
 }
 }
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 3775301 records from 310 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0019667-260108223611665/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/fg9b3x
title: Digitized experimental Raman and VROA spectra.

description: This dataset includes all the raw data from the digitized spectra in the form of an Excel spreadsheet. All spectra have been digitized from the literature using the WebPlot Digitizer program (https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer/tutorial.html). Please refer to the article for the appropriate citations. If you are using the data in this dataset, you MUST cite the original works as detailed in the article.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/4yjv8s
title: Sub Saharan Africa – Challenge Program: Lake Kivu Pilot Learning Site

description: Agriculture and natural resources contribute the largest share of the economy of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Rwanda and Uganda. Agriculture contributes 42%, 40% and 24% of the GDP in DRC, Rwanda and Uganda respectively. The three countries are home to the largest tropical forests in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). DRC alone accounts for 34% of the carbon stock in Africa, the largest contribution in Africa. Additionally, in each country, a large share of the population depends on agriculture and other natural resources. Despite the importance of the agricultural and natural resource sector, public investment in agriculture in all countries is low. In order to foster the development of agriculture in such a way that it will yield improvement in the livelihood of the smallholder farmers and other stakeholders in the sector, the Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa proposed the Integrated agricultural research for Development (IAR4D)to foster a paradigm change in the way ARD activities are conducted. The concept is a complete deviation from the conventional method as it entails a multi-sectoral and multi-institutional style, while it uses hard and soft sciences to generate solutions to the benefits of all the stakeholders on a platform. The program aims to conduct a proof of the IAR4D concept with a rigorous research design and as such require the baseline characteristics of the test environment. The baseline survey that was arranged covers the socio-economic characteristics, NRM component and market issues. This initial measurement will serve as the major long-term measure for monitoring the succes
s of the IAR4D approach. Thus, the specific objectives of the baseline documentation 1. To establish the base measure of the socio-economic, NRM and market condition thereby establishing the basis for the project monitoring and evaluation (M
&E) system 2. To establish or validate the indicator targets described in the M&E system. 3. To provide information to the IP partners who will inform members regarding the actual situation at the commencement of the project and also support the design of interventions for increased impact.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/kmcptf
title: Brownian Motion Experimental testing - Media Files

description: Brownian Motion Experimental Testing - Media Files
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/lgr5q7
title: Replication data for: Defense Pacts: A Prescription for Peace?

description: Do military alliances lead to peace or to war? Research has suggested that defensive alliances to potential targets deter dispute initiation (Leeds 2003b:427). This would seem to suggest that forming defensive alliances is a good policy prescription for those seeking to encourage peace. Yet, some argue that even if defense pacts have a deterrence effect, defense pacts may also have other effects that increase militarized conflict in the international system. Specifically, defense pacts may encourage member states to initiate and/or escalate disputes. In an analysis covering the period from 1816 to 2000, we evaluate these three potential effects of defense pacts—deterrence, initiation, and escalation. We find support for the hypothesis that defensive alliances deter the initiation of disputes but no evidence in support of the claims that states with defensive allies are more likely to initiate disputes in the international system or that targets with allies are more likely to respond to dispute initiation with further militarization. We conclude that defensive alliances lower the probability of international conflict and are thus a good policy option for states seeking to maintain peace in the world.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/5ojfll
title: Agroindustrial 1
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/hurbh3
title: Replication data for: Germann, Micha, Fernando Mendez, and Kostas Gemenis. "Do voting advice applications affect party preferences? Evidence from field experiments in five European countries", forthcoming in Political Communication

description: This repository includes all data files and statistical code necessary to reproduce the results reported in both the paper itself and the online appendix.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/qh6n40
title: PDB - 4ZS7: IL-6 in complex with mAb 68F2, (312K, 39°C, 100 ns): RMSD, SASA, RMSF, Rg, H-bonds

description: PDB - 4ZS7: IL-6 in complex with mAb 68F2, (312K, 39°C, 100 ns): RMSD, SASA, RMSF, Rg, H-bonds
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ch91c
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1850, Docket 2525, SC1/series 230, Petition of Thomas Hines

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Abolition of capital punishment &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13481546"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13481546&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1850-01 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Monroe &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Bradford Pratt, Dighton; committee on the judiciary &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Thomas Hines&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;H. Gilbert Ballou&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hosea Ballou&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Russell Ballou&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;David Ballou&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Julina Hines&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Eliza Phelps&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;David Goodell&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1850-02-04 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on February 4, 1850 and referred to the committee on the judiciary &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 54 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 20 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 25 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Other male signatures: 9 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: inhabitants, legal voters, females and others, [females], [other males], ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1850, Docket 2525 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/8unxc2
title: Wright Files I-Z Edited; Docketed Case: 19163
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/atmacd
title: Health Characteristics of Assisted Living Residents in Louisville, KY

description: Self-reported health characteristics of assisted living residents in Louisville, KY. Measures include mental well-being (Quality of Life Inventory), social capital (Collective Efficacy Scale), general health status and instrumental activities of daily living
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ibwskl
title: Passed Acts; St. 1861, c.91, SC1/series 229, Petition of Thomas Norton

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: For the repeal of the personal liberty laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10668939"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10668939&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Massachusetts &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: George Curtis, Roxbury; committee on the personal liberty laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Thomas Norton&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;George Curtis Monburg&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;William McDermott&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Thomas Sloman&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1861-01-23,1861-01-25 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on January 23, 1861 and referred to the committee on the personal liberty laws and received in the Senate on January 25, 1861 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 70 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 70 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: undersigned, ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: St. 1861, c.91, passed March 25, 1861 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/l80dzi
title: Replication Data for: Settling Resistant Territorial Disputes: The Territorial Boundary Peace in Latin America

description: Why do some territorial disputes defy settlement? Through what mechanism might these resistant territorial disputes be settled? We propose that the answer involves three individually necessary and jointly sufficient conditions. First, the dispute must receive attention—i.e., be (re)placed and (re)prioritized on the dyad's agenda. Second, governments need altered preferences that expand the bargaining range so they can break deadlock and pursue settlement. Finally, disputing states need third-party assistance to facilitate, locate, incentivize, and support a settlement of their protracted dispute. We test this “AAA Model” in post–World War II Latin America. To do this, we first theorize the particular form of the general model; in post–1945 Latin America, attention, altered preferences, and third-party assistance operate through the mechanisms of militarization, democratization, and mediation respectively. We then identify resistant territorial disputes and advance a novel, multimethod research design to evaluate our hypotheses—one that relies more heavily on within-case counterfactual analysis. An extensive series of these counterfactual analyses, along with a statistical analysis, produce consistent, significant support for our model. When resistant territorial disputes in post–1945 Latin America have attention, altered preferences, and third-party assistance simultaneously, they always settle; when they lack any one factor, however, settlement never occurs.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/piwo7g
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 19,936
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/pyysh
title: Passed Acts; St. 1861, c.91, SC1/series 229, Petition of Marshal Stearns

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: For the repeal of the personal liberty laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10668894"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10668894&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1861-01-17 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Brookline &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Edward R. Seccomb, Brookline; committee on the personal liberty laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Marshal Stearns&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;George Adams&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Richard Soule Jr.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1861-01-21,1861-01-22 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on January 21, 1861 and referred to the committee on the personal liberty laws and received in the Senate on January 22, 1861 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 120 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 120 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, legal voters, ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: St. 1861, c.91, passed March 25, 1861 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/fdpiyw
title: Transform Practice Data

description: This data set comes as a supplementary resource for my book on Biostatistics and SPSS. Readers are free to download this file and practice using SPSS as they go along reading the book.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.aquvn7
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 0 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 "BasisOfRecord is one of (Human Observation, Machine Observation, Occurrence evidence, Observation)",
 "TaxonKey is one of (Myzomela rubratra (R.Lesson, 1827))",
 "Country is one of (Bermuda, Canada, Greenland, Saint Pierre and Miquelon, United States of America)"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 0 records from 0 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0015133-250525065834625/datasets/export for details.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/icqzbo
title: Replication data for Calil et al. (2017): Coastal Vulnerability Data

description: Fields included in this data set are: OBJECTID_1 - Centroid ID (unique identifiers for coastal segments used in the study); Lat - Latitude of the center of coastal segments; Long - Longitude of the center of coastal segments; Percentund - Child Malnutrition Rate (%); IMR - Infant Mortality Rate; GINI - Inequality Coefficient; GDP - Used in conjunction with GINI to calculate a social welfare function.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/labfjz
title: November 2006 Post-Election Tracking

description: This data set contains questions about the 2006 elections and sources of information about the campaign. It was used in the reports "Election 2006 Online" and "Robocalls During the 2006 Campaign" and contains both RDD and cell phone respondents.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/fr7jk
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1845, Docket 11633, SC1/series 231, Petition of Henry I. Bowditch

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Support for asylum for discharged convicts &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858206"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858206&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Massachusetts &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Henry Wilson, Middlesex; committee on public charitable institutions &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Henry I. Bowditch&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Joseph Southwick&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;William C. Nell&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;William P. Atkinson&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;John Rogers&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Josiah Wolcott&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;William Waterson Marjoram&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;John J. Mitchell&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Bela Marsh&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;William I. Bowditch&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Wendell Phillips&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Charles Spear&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Robert R. Crosby&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Henry J. Prentiss&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1845-01-16,1845-01-17 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the Senate on January 16, 1845 and referred to the committee on public charitable institutions and sent for concurrence and received in the House on January 17, 1845 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 35 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 35 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, [males of color], ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Towns next to names including Boston, West Roxbury, New Bedford, Holliston, Northampton, Quincy, Lynn, Stoneham &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1845, Docket 11633 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/klwepz
title: Wright Files I-Z Edited; Docketed Case: 72-2159
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/5wn7ia
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 77-1722
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/6evmv1
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 19,452
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/fqitop
title: Passed Resolves; Resolves 1969, c.61, SC1/series 228, Petition of Andre R. Sigourney

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: School discrimination &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25500548"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25500548&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Nahant &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Andre R. Sigourney, Nahant; committee on education &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Andre R. Sigourney&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1969-01-01,1969-01-01 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on January 1, 1969 and referred to the committee on education and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on January 1, 1969 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: for an investigation by a special commission including members of the General Court of the possible closing of Catholic schools, the effect of such closing on public schools and the feasibility of purchasing certain parochial school buildings, includes address &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Resolves 1969, c.61, passed August 4, 1969 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/pfyvfw
title: Replication code and data for "Competing for Deal Flow in Local Mortgage Markets"

description: Replication code and data for "Competing for Deal Flow in Local Mortgage Markets"