DOI: 10.48579/pro/jg0pi0
title: Replication data for: Fig 10.2, Lower left, UPDs, Clan type vs clan size vs copfems, 19 Dec 2025

description: FILE DESCRIPTION Keywords: Utah prairie dog, clan size, clan type, copulating females File name = Fig 10.2, Lower left, UPDs, Clan type vs clan size vs copfems, 19 Dec 2025 OLDFile name = UPDs, Male ARS vs wt, clansize, clantype, 24 Sept 2021 I started this file from File name = UPDs, Male ARS for cops vs male body mass, No 0s, 28 Aug 2021, Details below. In this file, clantype = 0.5 = Half-male clan, for which &gt;=1 females are controlled by single male No-male clan had no resident sexually mature male in May Half-male clan shared a single sexually mature male in May with another clan One-male clan had a single resident sexually mature male in May Multi-male clan had &gt;=2 sexually mature males in May For more information about clan types, see Chapter 10 of Hoogland 2025 Clantype = 1 = One male clan Clantype = 2 = Multi-male clan Clantype = 0 = Male that lived alone, with no other females in his territory, who did not DISAPPEAR shortly after mating season If a UPD male mated and then disappeared in early April, I did not assign a clantype to that male. But I DO assign a clan size for a male that disappeared in April if he copulated before disappearance. This file has now been checked TWO TIMES on 24 Sept 2021 for Clansize and Clantype Clantype = 0 refers to where UPD male lived in May. He might have lived in a typical clan territory during the mating season, and then move away and lived alone in May and June. Hence Clantype = 0. Other data checked on earlier dates. See below for details. OLD File name = UPDs, Male ARS for cops vs male body mass, No 0s, 28 Aug 2021 I started this file from File name = UPDs, Male ARS for cops, 14 Aug 2021. Details below. On 28 Aug 2021, I add Junewts. Note well: All males in this file had at least ONE Sexpartner for each year On 28 Aug 2021, I checked Marchwt and Junewt TWO TIMES. All other variables checked TWO TIMES earlier. See below for details. Date = 22 Jan 2021 for EARLIER VERSION of this file. This file has been checked TWO TIMES on 21-22 Jan 2021. But see notes below. A UPD male will have the SAME EARTAGS in different years, but will have a different Dognum in different years For most analyses, I will consider data from the same UPD male in different years to be statistically independent OKtouse = 1 means that we think we observed most or all copulations by a UPD male in a particular year OKtouse = 0 means that we think we DID NOT OBSERVE most or all copulations by a UPD male in a particular year I confess some subjectivity in the assignments of 1 or 2 to variable = OK to use. I only use AGE if I was certain--or almost certain--about a UPD male's exact age SEXPARTNERS = minimal number of UPD females with whom UPD male copulated, with or without MCs by the copulating male Note that 1, 2, or 3 UPD males might have the same UPD Marker, but they will have different Eartags. Copfems = Sexpartners On 10 August 2021, I discover that eartag for UPD male-16 should be K7 instead of K75. This affects both male-16 (missing) in 1998 and male-40 (2 entries instead of 1) Should I include 48 (O85) in 2000? No, so Oktouse = 0. Should I include 29 (P55) in 2000? Yes, because 29 was a roaming male during the 2000 mating season. Should I include 23 in 2001? No, so Oktouse = 0. Should I include 40 in 2001 and 2002? No, so Oktouse = 0 for 2001 and 2002. I should delete R16-20 in 2004 for analysis of LRS--but no need to delete for ARS in 2004 Wait! This file is for ARS--so I can RETAIN OF THE LAST FEW CASES IN Lines 278-283. R41 (Y31) was not sexually mature in 2001. Percent MCs is now missing data for R41. Note on 11 Aug 2021: Notice this note from above on 22 Jan 2021: SEXPARTNERS = minimal number of UPD females with whom UPD male copulated, with or without MCs by the copulating male OLDFile name on 14 Aug 2012 = UPDs, Male ARS for cops, 13 Aug 2021 I revise this file today for Variable = SEXPARTNERS. This revision is based on checking UPD Copulation Summary SHEETS AND INCORPORATING ANY CHANGES IN SEXPARTNERS SINCE VERSION OF 22 Jan 2021 Revision = 0 = No change Revision = 1 = change on 13 Aug 2021 This file has now been checked TWO TIMES on 13 Aug 2021 I will use this file for figure that shows ARS for UPD male cops Eventually, I will add info from microsatellites = microsats on ARS for UPD babies and UPDs yearlings On 13 Aug 2021, I delete most data for R01 (F3A) in 2005 In this file if SEXPARTNERS = 0, then I have changed PERCENTMCS to MISSING DATA (.) Earlier version of this file was based on MAXCOPS. This version is based on Mincops= my best estimate of the number of sexual partners for each UPD male. I had three categories of confidence of whether a copulation occurred: Definite cop, with no ambiguities. I score all these. Probable cop, but I could not be sure, with ONE ?. I score all these. Possible cop, but unlikely, with TWO ?s or brackets. For this file, I do NOT score these. On 13 Aug 2021, I also verify eartags for all UPDs in this file. Remember: For all valid cases in this file, Sexpartners is always &gt;=1. For about 5 cases, Sexpartners = . = missing data. File name = UPDs, Male ARS for cops, 16 Aug 2021. This file has now been checked TWO TIMES on 16 Aug 2021 On 16 Aug 2021, I check the following variables TWO TIMES: UPD MALE, AGE, and BODY MASS I do NOT re-check the following variables, which were checked TWO TIMES in earlier files: BODY MASS All information on siring of emergent juveniles and yearlings from microsatellites determined by Stephen R. Keller and Regina Trott. These data used for Figure 10.2 in Hoogland 2026. This file ready for longterm storage on 11 Feb 2025. File name = Fig 10.2, Lower left, UPDs, Clan type vs clan size vs copfems, 19 Dec 2025 Note well: This file contains copious data beyond what is needed for Fig 10.2. See other EXCEL files for details. for variables such as Marchwt, Junewt All clan sizes and clan types are from MAY.