DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13847130
title: The LUCKINet land use ontology

description: 1. Rationale

The LUCKINet land use ontology expands AGROVOC, developed by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Like AGROVOC, the LUCKINet land use ontology uses semantic web technology powered by the Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS).

The ontology has been primarily developed to support the LUCKINet effort to standardize approaches that develop gridded information on land use dynamics. As standards develop from the needs of various stakeholders, we have designed this ontology in a way that it can grow organically with emerging use cases. The focal unit is the crop or livestock species, which makes it easy to align our ontology with other vocabularies and typologies. The ontology is distinguished into two main sections: landcover and land-use concepts.

We built the ontology with a strong focus on mapping land-use concepts to FAO/AGROVOC concepts to foster interoperability with the wealth of other projects building on AGROVOC. Moreover, concepts from different state-of-the-art datasets, such as land use from statistical agencies worldwide and the (grey) literature, are considered.

You will find landcover concepts in this ontology in an unfamiliar way. In many projects, landcover is an amalgamation of concepts across various functional types of concepts. For example, 'cropland' is often regarded as a landcover, but because it also includes human activities managing that cover, it is not a pure cover but also a use type. We, therefore, revised the former version of this ontology, which was heavily centred on the CORINE Land Cover classification, to be more consistent from a semantic point of view. Any level now distinguishes only one conceptual dimension. The ontology is now distinguished into land cover, dynamic and use. Cover is characterized purely by the material or entities covering the surface, dynamics are characterized by the most dominant process (such as management or productiveness), and use is characterized by how the sphere covering the surface is managed and what is used.

2. Method

The ontology was built with the R-package ontologics v0.7.3, which enables reproducibility and transparency in creating an ontology. A script documenting this process is part of this publication.

Concepts were taken from the external datasets harmonized during the LUCKINet and Global Pasture Watch project (the harmonized data are published on zenodo).

2.1 Sources

The ontology is an amalgamation of various datasets:



The FAO Indicative Crop Classification (ICC) v1.1 provides a hierarchical structure of crop and livestock concepts.

The FAO Crops and livestock products (QCL) dataset contains a range of concepts used by the FAO and frequently by statistical offices of nations that make their census data publicly available.

The FAO Land Use (RL) dataset contains a hierarchical set of land-use concepts that represent the most harmonized representation of land-use concepts to date.

The FAO Forest Resource Assessment (FRA) contains a detailed set of forest classes that fit well with the FAO Land Use vocabulary and represent relevant classes at a coarse scale (Sections 1b, 1e, 1f).

CORINE Land Cover (CLC) classes are used as the basis to define the (hierarchical) organization of land cover and land use classes (into which the crop and livestock commodities are nested).


2.2 Classes

The ontology is hierarchically structured into the following classes:



domain



landcover



land dynamic



land use





production 



group 



class



crop

animal









 domain: the overarching dimensions into which all other concepts are nested. These represent conceptually different kinds of classification systems (landcover and production).

landcover: surface area described by the predominant landcover in that location.

production: surface area described by the crops and livestock produced in that location.

land dynamic: surface area described by the predominant attribute determining dynamics within the landcover type.

land use: surface area described by mutually exclusive types of how land covered by a particular type and dynamic is used.

group: broad groups of concepts that describe crops and livestock.

class: mutually exclusive types of concepts that describe crops and livestock.

crop/animal: individual commodities (typically at species level).


2.3 Concepts

The bulk of the ontology consists of a collection of concepts, each an instance of a specific class. The concepts also bear hierarchical relations determined by their class affiliation. For example, the concept of Cultivated grazingland (class: use) is semantically narrower than Managed vegetation (class: dynamic), which in turn is narrower than the concept of VEGETATED LAND (class: lancover), which is narrower than landcover (class: domain).

2.4 Mappings

As far as possible, concepts are mapped to all corresponding wikidata and GBIF concepts. For example, the concept of maize is mapped to wikidata concepts Q11575 and Q25618328 and GBIF concept 5290052. Moreover, concepts are mapped to the



life-form concepts graminoid, forb, herb, shrub, tree

purpose concepts energy, fibre, food, wood, forage, silage, fodder, industrial, recreation, medicinal and labour and reproduction

used-part concepts bark, bast, biomass, buds, bulb, eggs, flower, fruit, hair, honey, husk, leaves, lint, meat, dairy, resin, root, sap, seed, shoot, stalk, time, tuber, fur and silk

agronomic attributes such as the years-before-harvest and years-of-harvest (i.e., for how many years a crop, once mature, can be harvested)


3. Files

- make_ontology.R: The script used to build this ontology- luckiOnto.rds: the ontology to access and manipulate with R and the ontologics R-package

4. Version changes



uses a new version of ontologics

revised hierarchy of landcover concepts

includes livestock concepts

no mapping to 'persistence' concepts anymore; instead, years-before-harvest (YBH) and years-of-harvest (YOH) are introduced.

various rare species are now included


5. Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding to Carsten Meyer through the Flexpool mechanism of the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) (FZT-118, DFG). Several developments in this software stem from work on the GeoKur research data infrastructure. GeoKur is granted by the BMBF (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) under number 16QK04A. Revisions of the ontology pertaining to the landcover hierarchy and livestock concepts were made during the initial funding period of the Global Pasture Watch Project.