cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518375.v1
title: Appendix A. Formulations for extensions of the models that include movement distance.

description: Formulations for extensions of the models that include movement distance.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518372
title: Appendix B. Likelihood-based inference using particle swarm optimization and expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm.

description: Likelihood-based inference using particle swarm optimization and expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518372.v1
title: Appendix B. Likelihood-based inference using particle swarm optimization and expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm.

description: Likelihood-based inference using particle swarm optimization and expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518369
title: Appendix C. A demonstration of parameter estimation using simulated data.

description: A demonstration of parameter estimation using simulated data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518369.v1
title: Appendix C. A demonstration of parameter estimation using simulated data.

description: A demonstration of parameter estimation using simulated data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518366
title: Appendix D. Additional behavioral landscape maps and examples of applications to several areas in Orange County, California, USA.

description: Additional behavioral landscape maps and examples of applications to several areas in Orange County, California, USA.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518366.v1
title: Appendix D. Additional behavioral landscape maps and examples of applications to several areas in Orange County, California, USA.

description: Additional behavioral landscape maps and examples of applications to several areas in Orange County, California, USA.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518363
title: Appendix A. Supplemental study site information, including the range of field-estimated snow water equivalent (SWE) and elevation in snow shadow vs. other regions, and the trend in SNODAS bias over time.

description: Supplemental study site information, including the range of field-estimated snow water equivalent (SWE) and elevation in snow shadow vs. other regions, and the trend in SNODAS bias over time.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518363.v1
title: Appendix A. Supplemental study site information, including the range of field-estimated snow water equivalent (SWE) and elevation in snow shadow vs. other regions, and the trend in SNODAS bias over time.

description: Supplemental study site information, including the range of field-estimated snow water equivalent (SWE) and elevation in snow shadow vs. other regions, and the trend in SNODAS bias over time.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518360
title: Appendix A. Tables presenting equations for the multiple element limitation (MEL) model and the process and parameter definitions, values, and sources for the MEL model.

description: Tables presenting equations for the multiple element limitation (MEL) model and the process and parameter definitions, values, and sources for the MEL model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518357
title: Appendix A. Description of the Pmax technique used to calculate exploitation rates from catch and spawner abundance data.

description: Description of the Pmax technique used to calculate exploitation rates from catch and spawner abundance data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518357.v1
title: Appendix A. Description of the Pmax technique used to calculate exploitation rates from catch and spawner abundance data.

description: Description of the Pmax technique used to calculate exploitation rates from catch and spawner abundance data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518354
title: Appendix B. Supplemental figures showing details of louse abundance and salinity for spatially intensive surveys in the Broughton Archipelago, British Columbia, Canada, in 2009.

description: Supplemental figures showing details of louse abundance and salinity for spatially intensive surveys in the Broughton Archipelago, British Columbia, Canada, in 2009.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518354.v1
title: Appendix B. Supplemental figures showing details of louse abundance and salinity for spatially intensive surveys in the Broughton Archipelago, British Columbia, Canada, in 2009.

description: Supplemental figures showing details of louse abundance and salinity for spatially intensive surveys in the Broughton Archipelago, British Columbia, Canada, in 2009.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518351
title: Appendix C. Supplemental tables describing the pink salmon spawning rivers included in the analysis and results from the analysis of parasiticide treatments on farm salmon.

description: Supplemental tables describing the pink salmon spawning rivers included in the analysis and results from the analysis of parasiticide treatments on farm salmon.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518351.v1
title: Appendix C. Supplemental tables describing the pink salmon spawning rivers included in the analysis and results from the analysis of parasiticide treatments on farm salmon.

description: Supplemental tables describing the pink salmon spawning rivers included in the analysis and results from the analysis of parasiticide treatments on farm salmon.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518348
title: Supplement 1. Details of the analysis of pink salmon population data, including spawner and catch data and R code for compiling spawner-recruit pairs and fitting the Ricker model.

description: File List nuSEDS_PINK.csv (md5: 817593c4467c074239177e92379db2bd)<br> Catch_PINK.csv (md5: a9442b3ebafbf77d5437e36b6b0faad3)<br> 1_DataCompilation.R (md5: 1eb5bac1081e5ac2f307b00e4a75c8ef)<br> 2_PopulationAnalysis.R (md5: 017c4ea62556877b4b028bb2b4dc947d) Description The following files are made available with the intention of ensuring our manipulation of data and analysis of pink salmon populations is entirely transparent. We assume that the reader is familiar with the program R, which can be downloaded from the web at cran.r-project.org. Any errors in transcribing and manipulating the data are the sole responsibility of the authors. Additional data and code for the analysis of farm treatments and lice on wild salmon are available upon email request to Stephanie Peacock [stephanie.peacock@ualberta.ca]. nuSEDS_PINK.csv contains spawner data for pink salmon populations in British Columbia, Canada from 1950–2010, provided by Fisheries and Oceans Canada (contact: Bruce Baxter [bruce.baxter@dfo-mpo.gc.ca]). These data include the following columns: Area: Fisheries management area, the spatial scale at which catch data are reported.<br> River: The river at which spawners were enumerated, the finest scale at which spawner data are available.<br> Yr: The year spawners were enumerated.<br> Escapement: The estimated number of spawners in that river in that year, from the nuSEDS database. Catch_PINK.csv contains catch data for pink salmon by management area, provided by different area managers at Fisheries and Oceans Canada (contacts: Pieter VanWill [pieter.vanwill@dfo-mpo.gc.ca] and David Peacock [david.peacock@dfo-mpo.gc.ca]). These data include the following columns: Area: Fisheries management area, the spatial scale at which catch data are reported.<br> Odd_Even: Integer indicated whether the catch was of an odd-year population (= 1) or even year (= 2).<br> Year: The year of the catch.<br> Catch: The number of pieces of pink salmon caught in all fisheries for the given year and area. 1_DataCompilation.R is R code that calls the previous two data files and calculates the number of recruits per spawner. 2_PopulationAnalysis.R is R code that fits the linearized Ricker model to the spawner recruit data, and tests for an effect of sea lice on wild salmon.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518345
title: Appendix A. Detailed model results by ecoregion.

description: Detailed model results by ecoregion.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518345.v1
title: Appendix A. Detailed model results by ecoregion.

description: Detailed model results by ecoregion.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518342
title: Appendix A. Minimum line and polygon trials.

description: Minimum line and polygon trials.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518342.v1
title: Appendix A. Minimum line and polygon trials.

description: Minimum line and polygon trials.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518339
title: Appendix B. Additional tables on fire rotations and fire sizes.

description: Additional tables on fire rotations and fire sizes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518339.v1
title: Appendix B. Additional tables on fire rotations and fire sizes.

description: Additional tables on fire rotations and fire sizes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518336
title: Appendix C. Ambiguity and uncertainty.

description: Ambiguity and uncertainty.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518336.v1
title: Appendix C. Ambiguity and uncertainty.

description: Ambiguity and uncertainty.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518333
title: Appendix A. Mean field approximation of the simulation.

description: Mean field approximation of the simulation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518333.v1
title: Appendix A. Mean field approximation of the simulation.

description: Mean field approximation of the simulation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518330
title: Appendix A. Forest statistics reported by the U.S. Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis program for the 19 states from Virginia and Kentucky north to Wisconsin and Maine.

description: Forest statistics reported by the U.S. Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis program for the 19 states from Virginia and Kentucky north to Wisconsin and Maine.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518330.v1
title: Appendix A. Forest statistics reported by the U.S. Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis program for the 19 states from Virginia and Kentucky north to Wisconsin and Maine.

description: Forest statistics reported by the U.S. Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis program for the 19 states from Virginia and Kentucky north to Wisconsin and Maine.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518327
title: Appendix B. Maximum-likelihood estimates and two-unit support intervals for parameters of the plot-level and tree-level analyses, and goodness-of-fit metrics for both sets of models.

description: Maximum-likelihood estimates and two-unit support intervals for parameters of the plot-level and tree-level analyses, and goodness-of-fit metrics for both sets of models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518327.v1
title: Appendix B. Maximum-likelihood estimates and two-unit support intervals for parameters of the plot-level and tree-level analyses, and goodness-of-fit metrics for both sets of models.

description: Maximum-likelihood estimates and two-unit support intervals for parameters of the plot-level and tree-level analyses, and goodness-of-fit metrics for both sets of models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518324
title: Appendix A. Detailed documentation of field data collection and used variables: six tables of temperature, one-to-one analyses, and squared Mahalanobis distances, and three figures, including a map of study sites, impact of human use on Myotis mystacinus/M. brandtii, and ecological-niche factor analysis (ENFA) analyses results for Myotis daubentonii and Plecorus auritus.

description: Detailed documentation of field data collection and used variables: six tables of temperature, one-to-one analyses, and squared Mahalanobis distances, and three figures, including a map of study sites, impact of human use on Myotis mystacinus/M. brandtii, and ecological-niche factor analysis (ENFA) analyses results for Myotis daubentonii and Plecorus auritus.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518324.v1
title: Appendix A. Detailed documentation of field data collection and used variables: six tables of temperature, one-to-one analyses, and squared Mahalanobis distances, and three figures, including a map of study sites, impact of human use on Myotis mystacinus/M. brandtii, and ecological-niche factor analysis (ENFA) analyses results for Myotis daubentonii and Plecorus auritus.

description: Detailed documentation of field data collection and used variables: six tables of temperature, one-to-one analyses, and squared Mahalanobis distances, and three figures, including a map of study sites, impact of human use on Myotis mystacinus/M. brandtii, and ecological-niche factor analysis (ENFA) analyses results for Myotis daubentonii and Plecorus auritus.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518321
title: Appendix A. Relative consumption (percentage of bites) of plant species individually comprising less than 1% of total bites by non-supplemented (CON; control) and supplemented (SUP) cattle at different periods.

description: Relative consumption (percentage of bites) of plant species individually comprising less than 1% of total bites by non-supplemented (CON; control) and supplemented (SUP) cattle at different periods.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518321.v1
title: Appendix A. Relative consumption (percentage of bites) of plant species individually comprising less than 1% of total bites by non-supplemented (CON; control) and supplemented (SUP) cattle at different periods.

description: Relative consumption (percentage of bites) of plant species individually comprising less than 1% of total bites by non-supplemented (CON; control) and supplemented (SUP) cattle at different periods.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518318
title: Appendix B. Estimation of crude protein intake by supplemented heifers, if they were to select diets with crude protein levels similar to diets selected by the non-supplemented heifers.

description: Estimation of crude protein intake by supplemented heifers, if they were to select diets with crude protein levels similar to diets selected by the non-supplemented heifers.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518318.v1
title: Appendix B. Estimation of crude protein intake by supplemented heifers, if they were to select diets with crude protein levels similar to diets selected by the non-supplemented heifers.

description: Estimation of crude protein intake by supplemented heifers, if they were to select diets with crude protein levels similar to diets selected by the non-supplemented heifers.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518315
title: Appendix C. A photograph showing a classic patch of Rhinacanthus ndorensis, a forb species most commonly consumed by cattle, amid dry grass tufts.

description: A photograph showing a classic patch of Rhinacanthus ndorensis, a forb species most commonly consumed by cattle, amid dry grass tufts.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518315.v1
title: Appendix C. A photograph showing a classic patch of Rhinacanthus ndorensis, a forb species most commonly consumed by cattle, amid dry grass tufts.

description: A photograph showing a classic patch of Rhinacanthus ndorensis, a forb species most commonly consumed by cattle, amid dry grass tufts.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518312
title: Supplement 1. Data necessary to replicate statistical analyses of the effects of protein supplementation and sampling period on various measured parameters.

description: File List Odadi_data.csv [checksum: f9d7e3de260dad6bbff1b1fa3568793d] Description The Odadi_data.csv file is in comma-separated values format. It contains untransformed data on various response variables analysed in the study, including biting and movement behavior, performance (weight gain), diet quality, and selection. For each response variable, data are means for individual animals (replicates) per sampling period.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518312.v1
title: Supplement 1. Data necessary to replicate statistical analyses of the effects of protein supplementation and sampling period on various measured parameters.

description: File List Odadi_data.csv [checksum: f9d7e3de260dad6bbff1b1fa3568793d] Description The Odadi_data.csv file is in comma-separated values format. It contains untransformed data on various response variables analysed in the study, including biting and movement behavior, performance (weight gain), diet quality, and selection. For each response variable, data are means for individual animals (replicates) per sampling period.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518309
title: Appendix A. Figure showing Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE) whitebark pine distribution contained in either national parks or designated wilderness.

description: Figure showing Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE) whitebark pine distribution contained in either national parks or designated wilderness.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518309.v1
title: Appendix A. Figure showing Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE) whitebark pine distribution contained in either national parks or designated wilderness.

description: Figure showing Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE) whitebark pine distribution contained in either national parks or designated wilderness.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518306
title: Appendix B. Figure showing 2009 LAS flight lines.

description: Figure showing 2009 LAS flight lines.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518306.v1
title: Appendix B. Figure showing 2009 LAS flight lines.

description: Figure showing 2009 LAS flight lines.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518303
title: Appendix C. Figure delineating catchment boundary within mountainous region of the GYE.

description: Figure delineating catchment boundary within mountainous region of the GYE.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518303.v1
title: Appendix C. Figure delineating catchment boundary within mountainous region of the GYE.

description: Figure delineating catchment boundary within mountainous region of the GYE.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518300
title: Appendix D. Mountain pine beetle-caused mortality rating system.

description: Mountain pine beetle-caused mortality rating system.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518300.v1
title: Appendix D. Mountain pine beetle-caused mortality rating system.

description: Mountain pine beetle-caused mortality rating system.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518297
title: Appendix E. GYE-wide whitebark pine catchment map.

description: GYE-wide whitebark pine catchment map.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518297.v1
title: Appendix E. GYE-wide whitebark pine catchment map.

description: GYE-wide whitebark pine catchment map.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518294
title: Appendix F. Figure showing whitebark pine mortality ground verification.

description: Figure showing whitebark pine mortality ground verification.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518294.v1
title: Appendix F. Figure showing whitebark pine mortality ground verification.

description: Figure showing whitebark pine mortality ground verification.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518291
title: Appendix G. Figure showing aspect-related mortality pattern.

description: Figure showing aspect-related mortality pattern.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518291.v1
title: Appendix G. Figure showing aspect-related mortality pattern.

description: Figure showing aspect-related mortality pattern.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518288
title: Appendix H. Figure showing mid-slope mortality pattern.

description: Figure showing mid-slope mortality pattern.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518288.v1
title: Appendix H. Figure showing mid-slope mortality pattern.

description: Figure showing mid-slope mortality pattern.
DOI: 10.17028/rd.lboro.3518156
title: Selection of optimal sensors for predicting performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell .pdf

description: Paper published in Journal of Power Sources
DOI: 10.17028/rd.lboro.3518156.v1
title: Selection of optimal sensors for predicting performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell .pdf

description: Paper published in Journal of Power Sources
DOI: 10.17028/rd.lboro.3518141
title: IEEE 2014 Data Challenge Data

description: Dataset from IEEE 2014 data challenge, detailed information about the Data Challenge is included.
DOI: 10.17028/rd.lboro.3518138
title: Comparison of Polarization curves from the model and test data at different temperatures

description: Figure 2 of Selection of optimal sensors for predicting performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell, which is published in Journal of Power Sources
DOI: 10.17028/rd.lboro.3518108
title: Prediction results with selected sensors at different loading conditions

description: Figure 8 of Selection of optimal sensors for predicting performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell, which is published in Journal of Power Sources <br> <br>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518090
title: Supplement 1. Google Earth file (.kml) containing a "pop-up" aerial oblique image and numeric (0–5.4) mortality rating based on the mountain pine beetle mortality (MPBM) rating system for all "look-at points" used and referenced in this study (see Fig. 5 in main text).

description: File List supplement_files.zip (<b>928 MB</b>) (md5: 85694fd5d35fba24bfaa91bc171d2563)<br> readme.pdf (md5: 0f01dd510fcf24a10951b0cc90d58dc2)<br> all_lookat_points.kml (md5: a8f4603bb4fbbe54b4589e6c4260eb63)Description readme.pdf provides instructions on how to use these data. all_lookat_points.kml is a kml file that can be opened in Google Earth 6. This file contains all 4653 GYE-wide "look-at points" with a single numeric (0–5.4) mortality rating based on the Mountain Pine Beetle Mortality Rating System (Appendix D). The kml file references the associated thumbnail images (.jpg) and therefore both the .kml file and images must reside in the same folder to ensure proper functioning of the "pop-up" images in Google Earth. supplement_files.zip is a very large (928 MB) file that will take significant time to download. It contains all of the files for this supplement, including 4515 small format (thumbnail) aerial oblique image files (.jpg).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518090.v1
title: Supplement 1. Google Earth file (.kml) containing a "pop-up" aerial oblique image and numeric (0–5.4) mortality rating based on the mountain pine beetle mortality (MPBM) rating system for all "look-at points" used and referenced in this study (see Fig. 5 in main text).

description: File List supplement_files.zip (<b>928 MB</b>) (md5: 85694fd5d35fba24bfaa91bc171d2563)<br> readme.pdf (md5: 0f01dd510fcf24a10951b0cc90d58dc2)<br> all_lookat_points.kml (md5: a8f4603bb4fbbe54b4589e6c4260eb63)Description readme.pdf provides instructions on how to use these data. all_lookat_points.kml is a kml file that can be opened in Google Earth 6. This file contains all 4653 GYE-wide "look-at points" with a single numeric (0–5.4) mortality rating based on the Mountain Pine Beetle Mortality Rating System (Appendix D). The kml file references the associated thumbnail images (.jpg) and therefore both the .kml file and images must reside in the same folder to ensure proper functioning of the "pop-up" images in Google Earth. supplement_files.zip is a very large (928 MB) file that will take significant time to download. It contains all of the files for this supplement, including 4515 small format (thumbnail) aerial oblique image files (.jpg).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518087
title: Appendix A. Questionnaire used in interviews with fishers from nine villages along the Tocantins River, Brazilian Amazon.

description: Questionnaire used in interviews with fishers from nine villages along the Tocantins River, Brazilian Amazon.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518084
title: Appendix B. Survey used to quantify the species and biomasses of fish caught and type of fishing gear used by fishers in the Lower Tocantins River in the Brazilian Amazon.

description: Survey used to quantify the species and biomasses of fish caught and type of fishing gear used by fishers in the Lower Tocantins River in the Brazilian Amazon.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518084.v1
title: Appendix B. Survey used to quantify the species and biomasses of fish caught and type of fishing gear used by fishers in the Lower Tocantins River in the Brazilian Amazon.

description: Survey used to quantify the species and biomasses of fish caught and type of fishing gear used by fishers in the Lower Tocantins River in the Brazilian Amazon.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3518081
title: Appendix C. Correlations between the fish landed (biomass) and mentioned in interviews for each village.

description: Correlations between the fish landed (biomass) and mentioned in interviews for each village.