DOI: 10.7910/dvn/dd5iw6
title: Replication Data for: Challenging Humanitarian Intervention in the 21st century: British Domestic Actors and Horizontal Foreign Policy Contestation during the Syrian crisis Japanese Journal of Political Science

description: These are the qualitative data that I used for the article:

Akande, Dapo and Milanovic, Marko (21 November 2015) “The constructive ambiguity of the Security Council ISIS resolution.” European Journal of International Law blog.

Ambos, Kai (1999). Comment” on the articles by Bruno Simma, “Nato the UN and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects” and Antonio Cassese “Ex Iniuria Ius Oritur”, available at http://www.ejil.org/journal/Vol10/No1/coma.html.

Bellamy, Alex (2006) Whither the Responsibility to Protect? Humanitarian Intervention and the 2005 World Summit. Ethics and International Affairs, 20 (2), pp. 143-169.

Bevir, Mark, Daddow, Oliver, and Hall, Ian (2013) Introduction: Interpreting British Foreign Policy. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 15, pp. 163-174.

Brockmeier, Sarah, et al (2016). The Impact of the Libyan Intervention Debates on Norm Protection. Global Society, 30(1), 113-133.

Cantir, Cristian and Kaarbo, Juliet (eds.) (2016) Domestic Role Contestation, Foreign Policy, and International Relations, London, Routledge.

Cantir, Cristian and Kaarbo, Juliet (January 2012) Contested roles and domestic politics: reflections on role theory in foreign policy analysis and IR theory. Foreign Policy Analysis 8(1), pp. 5-24.

Chandler, David (2011) Libya: The End of Intervention. In The Responsibility to Protect: Challenges & Opportunities in Light of the Libyan Intervention. Bristol, E-International Relations, pp. 24-5.

Checkel, Jeffrey, T. (1997) International Norms and Domestic Politics: Bridging the Rationalist-Constructivist Divide. European Journal of International Relations 3(4), pp. 473-95.

Clegg, Nick et al. (29 August 2013) Why we must Act against Syria’s Chemical Weapons. Evening Standard.
Daalder, Ivo and O’Hanlon, Michael (2000) Winning Ugly: NATO’s War to Save Kosovo. Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press. 

Daddow, Oliver, Schnapper, Pauline (2013) Liberal Intervention in the Foreign Policy Thinking of Tony Blair and David Cameron. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 26(2), pp. 330-349.

Dunne, Tim (1998) Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. London, Palgrave. 

Foot, Rosemary (May 2017) China and the International Human Protection Regime: Beliefs, Power, and Status in a Changing Normative Order. International Affairs (661), pp. 1-11.

Gaskarth, Jamie (2014) Strategising Britain’s Role in the World. International Affairs, 90 (3), pp. 559-81.

Gaskarth, Jamie (2016) Intervention, Domestic Contestation, and Britain’s National Role Conceptions. In Cantir, C. and Kaarbo, J., Domestic Role Contestation, Foreign Policy, and International Relations London, Routledge, pp. 105-121.

George, Alexander and Bennett, Andrew (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MIT Press.

Hagan, Joe D, et al. (2001) Foreign Policy by Coalition: Deadlock, Compromise, and Anarchy. International Studies Review, 3(2), 169-216.

Glennon, J. Michael (1999). “The New Interventionism,” Foreign Affairs 78.
Harnisch, Sebastian, Frank, Cornelia, and Maull, Hanns W. (2011) Role Theory in International Relations: Approaches and Analyses. London: Routledge.

Hazan, Reuven (2000). Intra-party Politics and Peacemaking in Democratic Societies: Israel’s Labor Party and the Middle East Peace Process, 1992-96. Journal of Peace Research, 37(3), 363-78.

Heffernan, Richard (2005). Why the Prime Minister cannot be a President: Comparing Institutional Imperatives in Britain and America. Parliamentary Affairs, 58(1), 53-70.

Hehir, Aidan (2010) Humanitarian Intervention: An Introduction. London, Palgrave.

Hehir, A. (2011). The Illusion of Progress: Libya and the Future of R2P. In The Responsibility to Protect: Challenges & Opportunities in Light of the Libyan Intervention. Bristol, E-International Relations, pp. 18-9.

Hoekema, Jan (2004). Srebrenica, Dutchbat, and the Role of the Netherlands’ Parliament. In Hans Born, Heiner Hanggi (eds.), The Double Democratic Deficit: Parliamentary Accountability and the Use of Force under International Auspices, London: Ashgate, 73-89.

Holsti, Kalevi (1970) National role conceptions in the study of foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly 14 (3), pp. 233–309.

Holzgrefe J.L (2003). The Humanitarian Intervention Debate.” In Humanitarian Intervention Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas, edited by J.L. Holzgrefe and Robert O. Keohane, 15-52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Houghton, David, P (1996). The Role of Analogical Reasoning in Novel Foreign-Policy Situations. British Journal of Political Science, 26(4), 523-52.

Jervis, Robert (1976) Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kaarbo, Juliet, Kenealy, Daniel (2017) Precedents, parliaments, and foreign policy: Historical Analogy in the House of Commons vote on Syria. West European Politics, pp. 62-79.

Kaarbo, Juliet, Kenealy, Daniel (2015) No, Prime Minister: Explaining the House of Common’s Vote on Intervention in Syria. European Security, 1-22.

Kaarbo, Juliet, Kenealy, Daniel (January 2014) The House of Common’s vote on British intervention in Syria. ISPI, Analysis 228.

Kesgin, Baris, Kaarbo, Juliet (February 2010) When and how Parliaments influence Foreign Policy: The Case of Turkey’s Iraq Decision. International Studies Perspectives. 1 (11), pp. 19-36.

Kettel, Steven (2013) Dilemmas of Discourse: Legitimising Britain’s War on Terror. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 15, pp. 263-79.

Khong, Yuen, F (1992). Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

May, Ernest R. (1973). Lessons of the Past: The Use and Misuse of History in American Foreign Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

McCourt, David (2013) Embracing humanitarian intervention: Atlanticism and the UK interventions in Bosnia and Kosovo. British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 15 (2), pp. 246–62. 

Mello, Patrick A. (2017). Curbing the Royal Prerogative to use military force: The British House of Commons and the Conflicts in Libya and Syria. West European Politics, 40(1): 80-100.

Neumann, Iver B. (2008) Discourse Analysis. In Klotz, Audrey and Prakash, Deepa (eds). Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide. London, Palgrave, pp. 61-77.

Neustadt, Richard E., May, Ernest R. (1986). Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision-Makers. New York: Free Press.

Peters, Dirk, Wagner, Wolfgang (2014). Executive Privilege or Parliamentary Proviso? Exploring the Sources of Parliamentary War Powers. Armed Forces and Society. 40(2): 310-331.

Peterson, M. J (1997). The Use of Analogies in Developing Outer Space Law. International Organization, 51(2), 245-274.

Ralph, Jason et. al. (December 2017) Before the vote: UK Foreign policy discourse on Syria 2011-2013. Review of International Studies. 43 (5), pp. 875-97.

Rathbun, Brian C. (2004) Partisan Interventions European Party Politics and Peace Enforcement in the Balkans. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

Raunio, Tapio, Wagner, Wolfgang (2017) Towards Parliamentarisation of foreign and security policy? West European Politics 40(1), pp. 1-19.

Reifler, Jason. et al. (2014) Prudence, principle and minimal heuristics: British public opinion toward the use of military force in Afghanistan and Libya. British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 16(1), pp. 28–55. 

Reiter, Dan, Tillman, Erik (2002). Public, Legislative, and Executive Constraints on the Democratic Initiation of Conflict. The Journal of Politics, 64(3), 810-26.

Reus-Smit Christian (1999) The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Risse, Thomas (Winter 2000) “Let’s Argue!” Communicative Action in World Politics, International Organization 54(1), pp. 1-39.

Rose, Gideon (October 1998) Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics 51(1), pp. 144–72.

Saideman, Stephen, Auerswald, David P (2012). Comparing Caveats: Understanding the Sources of National Restrictions upon NATO’s Mission in Afghanistan. International Studies Quarterly. 56, 67-84.

Simma, Bruno (1999) NATO, the UN, and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects. European Journal of International Law (10), pp. 1-22; 

Strong, James (2015) Why Parliaments now decides on War: Tracing the Growth of the Parliamentary Prerogative through Syria, Libya, and Iraq. British Journal of Politics and International Relations (17), pp. 604-22.

Wagner, Wolfgang, et al. (2018) Party Politics at the Water’s Edge: Contestation of Military Operations in Europe. European Political Science Review, 1-27.

Weiss, Thomas G (2011) Whither R2P? In The Responsibility to Protect: Challenges & Opportunities in Light of the Libyan Intervention. Bristol, E-International Relations, pp. 7-11.

Weiss, Thomas G (2014) After Syria: Whither R2P? In Murray, Robert W. and McKay Alasdair. Into the Eleventh Hour: R2P, Syria, and Humanitarianism in Crisis. Bristol, E-International Relations, pp. 34-7.

Weiss, Thomas G (June 2004) The Sunset of Humanitarian Intervention? Responsibility to Protect in a Unipolar Era. Security Dialogue, 35 (2), pp. 135-53.

Weller, Mark (25 November 2015) Permanent Imminence of Armed Attacks: Resolution 2249 (2015) and the Right to Self Defence against Designated Terrorist Groups. European Journal of International Law Blog.