cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.15156/bio/sh0060747.10fu
title: SH0060747.10FU

description: UNITE provides a unified way for delimiting, identifying, communicating, and working with DNA-based Species Hypotheses (SH). All fungal ITS sequences in the international nucleotide sequence databases are clustered to approximately the species level by applying a set of dynamic distance values (<0.5 - 3.0%). All species hypotheses are given a unique, stable name in the form of a DOI, and their taxonomic and ecological annotations are verified through distributed, web-based third-party annotation efforts. SHs are connected to a taxon name and its classification as far as possible (phylum, class, order, etc.) by taking into account identifications for all sequences in the SH. An automatically or manually designated sequence is chosen to represent each such SH. These sequences are released (https://unite.ut.ee/repository.php) for use by the scientific community in, for example, local sequence similarity searches and next-generation sequencing analysis pipelines. The system and the data are updated automatically as the number of public fungal ITS sequences grows.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31005786
title: Additional file 1 of Do current biomass equations for Alnus glutinosa and Betula pubescens misestimate carbon stocks at peatland sites?

description: Additional file 1: Biomass equations and coefficients: Additional file 1 displays all biomass equations and parameter values used for the comparison with 41, DEU. Biomass equations are reportet for all available biomass components (“comp”) where “AGB” refers to the total aboveground biomass, “SW” is stemwood ”SB” is stemwood bark, ”STW” is stumpwood ”STB” is stumpwood bark, ”FWB” is finewood NDL” is foliage. The “ln” is the natural logarithm and “log10” the 10-based logarithm. Columns “a”, “b”, “c”, “d”, “e”, “f”, “g”, “h”, “I”, “j”, “k”, “m”, “TSL”, “u_k” and “e_ki” provide parameter values. The IDs refer to the subsequent number of the paper used for the figures (“paper_ID”), the number of the equation in the respective paper (“func_ID”) and the ID used to refer to the equation in this study (“eq_ID”). The corresponding reference in this publication can be found in Table 1. The respective equation is provided in column “equation”. Column “peat” provides information about the site type the equation was parameterised for with “yes” meaning peatland, “no” meaning mineral sites and “partly” meaning the parameterisation included both, mineral and peatland sites. Additional information like units of the diameter (“DBH”), height (“H”) and biomass (“B”), number of sampled trees (“N”), coefficients of determination (“ $$\hbox {r}^2$$ /AIC”), and range of diameter (“DBH”), height (“H”) and age (“age”) of sampled trees are reported if available. Information on the respective reference are displayed in “author”, “tittle”, “year” and “DOI”.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31005786.v1
title: Additional file 1 of Do current biomass equations for Alnus glutinosa and Betula pubescens misestimate carbon stocks at peatland sites?

description: Additional file 1: Biomass equations and coefficients: Additional file 1 displays all biomass equations and parameter values used for the comparison with 41, DEU. Biomass equations are reportet for all available biomass components (“comp”) where “AGB” refers to the total aboveground biomass, “SW” is stemwood ”SB” is stemwood bark, ”STW” is stumpwood ”STB” is stumpwood bark, ”FWB” is finewood NDL” is foliage. The “ln” is the natural logarithm and “log10” the 10-based logarithm. Columns “a”, “b”, “c”, “d”, “e”, “f”, “g”, “h”, “I”, “j”, “k”, “m”, “TSL”, “u_k” and “e_ki” provide parameter values. The IDs refer to the subsequent number of the paper used for the figures (“paper_ID”), the number of the equation in the respective paper (“func_ID”) and the ID used to refer to the equation in this study (“eq_ID”). The corresponding reference in this publication can be found in Table 1. The respective equation is provided in column “equation”. Column “peat” provides information about the site type the equation was parameterised for with “yes” meaning peatland, “no” meaning mineral sites and “partly” meaning the parameterisation included both, mineral and peatland sites. Additional information like units of the diameter (“DBH”), height (“H”) and biomass (“B”), number of sampled trees (“N”), coefficients of determination (“ $$\hbox {r}^2$$ /AIC”), and range of diameter (“DBH”), height (“H”) and age (“age”) of sampled trees are reported if available. Information on the respective reference are displayed in “author”, “tittle”, “year” and “DOI”.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31005789
title: Additional file 2 of Do current biomass equations for Alnus glutinosa and Betula pubescens misestimate carbon stocks at peatland sites?

description: Additional file 2: Results of the Tukey-HSD test for biomass by equation: Additional file 2 displays the results of the Tukey-HSD test comparing the WAG results of all biomass equations per species (“species”) for significant differences. Column “contrast” shows which equations results were tested against which, while “term” displays the variable the groups originate from, in this case the equations IDs (“eq_ID”). Further, the table contains the difference in means (“diff”), the confidence levels (“conf.low”, “conf.high”) and the adjusted p-values (“adj.p.value”) for all possible pairs.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31005789.v1
title: Additional file 2 of Do current biomass equations for Alnus glutinosa and Betula pubescens misestimate carbon stocks at peatland sites?

description: Additional file 2: Results of the Tukey-HSD test for biomass by equation: Additional file 2 displays the results of the Tukey-HSD test comparing the WAG results of all biomass equations per species (“species”) for significant differences. Column “contrast” shows which equations results were tested against which, while “term” displays the variable the groups originate from, in this case the equations IDs (“eq_ID”). Further, the table contains the difference in means (“diff”), the confidence levels (“conf.low”, “conf.high”) and the adjusted p-values (“adj.p.value”) for all possible pairs.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31005792
title: Additional file 3 of Do current biomass equations for Alnus glutinosa and Betula pubescens misestimate carbon stocks at peatland sites?

description: Additional file 3: Results of the Tukey-HSD test for biomass by site type: Additional file 3 displays the results of the Tukey test comparing the WAG results of equations which were parametrised for peatland or mineral plots for significant differences. The species for which the differences were tested is listed in “species”. Column “contrast” shows which site type was tested against which, where “yes” means the equation was parametrised for peatland, “no” means the equation was parametrised for forests on mineral soils and “partly”, refers to equations that were developed with data from mineral and peatland sites. The column “term” displays the variable the groups originate from, in this case the equations peat status (“peat”). Further, the table contains the difference in means (“diff”), the confidence levels (“conf.low”, “conf.high”), and the adjusted p-values (“adj.p.value”) for all possible pairs.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31005792.v1
title: Additional file 3 of Do current biomass equations for Alnus glutinosa and Betula pubescens misestimate carbon stocks at peatland sites?

description: Additional file 3: Results of the Tukey-HSD test for biomass by site type: Additional file 3 displays the results of the Tukey test comparing the WAG results of equations which were parametrised for peatland or mineral plots for significant differences. The species for which the differences were tested is listed in “species”. Column “contrast” shows which site type was tested against which, where “yes” means the equation was parametrised for peatland, “no” means the equation was parametrised for forests on mineral soils and “partly”, refers to equations that were developed with data from mineral and peatland sites. The column “term” displays the variable the groups originate from, in this case the equations peat status (“peat”). Further, the table contains the difference in means (“diff”), the confidence levels (“conf.low”, “conf.high”), and the adjusted p-values (“adj.p.value”) for all possible pairs.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31005795
title: Additional file 4 of Do current biomass equations for Alnus glutinosa and Betula pubescens misestimate carbon stocks at peatland sites?

description: Additional file 4: Results of the Tukey-HSD test for carbon stocks by equation: Additional file 2 displays the results of the Tukey-HSD test comparing the C stock results of all biomass equations per species (“species) for significant differences. Column “contrast” shows which equations results were tested against which, while “term” displays the variable the groups originate from, in this case the equations IDs (“eq_ID”). Further, the table contains the difference in means (“diff”), the confidence levels (“conf.low”, “conf.high”) and the adjusted p-values (“adj.p.value”) for all possible pairs.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31005795.v1
title: Additional file 4 of Do current biomass equations for Alnus glutinosa and Betula pubescens misestimate carbon stocks at peatland sites?

description: Additional file 4: Results of the Tukey-HSD test for carbon stocks by equation: Additional file 2 displays the results of the Tukey-HSD test comparing the C stock results of all biomass equations per species (“species) for significant differences. Column “contrast” shows which equations results were tested against which, while “term” displays the variable the groups originate from, in this case the equations IDs (“eq_ID”). Further, the table contains the difference in means (“diff”), the confidence levels (“conf.low”, “conf.high”) and the adjusted p-values (“adj.p.value”) for all possible pairs.
DOI: 10.15156/bio/sh0060748.10fu
title: SH0060748.10FU

description: UNITE provides a unified way for delimiting, identifying, communicating, and working with DNA-based Species Hypotheses (SH). All fungal ITS sequences in the international nucleotide sequence databases are clustered to approximately the species level by applying a set of dynamic distance values (<0.5 - 3.0%). All species hypotheses are given a unique, stable name in the form of a DOI, and their taxonomic and ecological annotations are verified through distributed, web-based third-party annotation efforts. SHs are connected to a taxon name and its classification as far as possible (phylum, class, order, etc.) by taking into account identifications for all sequences in the SH. An automatically or manually designated sequence is chosen to represent each such SH. These sequences are released (https://unite.ut.ee/repository.php) for use by the scientific community in, for example, local sequence similarity searches and next-generation sequencing analysis pipelines. The system and the data are updated automatically as the number of public fungal ITS sequences grows.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31005798
title: Additional file 5 of Do current biomass equations for Alnus glutinosa and Betula pubescens misestimate carbon stocks at peatland sites?

description: Additional file 5: Results of the Tukey-HSD test for carbon stocks by site type: Additional file 5 displays the results of the Tukey-HSD test comparing the C stock results of equations which were parametrised for peatland or mineral plots for significant differences. The species for which the differences were tested is listed in “species”. Column “contrast” shows which site type was tested against which, where “yes” means the equation was parametrised for peatland, “no” means the equation was parametrised for forests on mineral soils and “partly” refers to equations that were developed with data from mineral and peatland sites. The column “term” displays the variable the groups originate from, in this case the equations peat status (“peat”). Further, the table contains the difference in means (“diff”), the confidence levels (“conf.low”, “conf.high”) and the adjusted p-values (“adj.p.value”) for all possible pairs.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31005798.v1
title: Additional file 5 of Do current biomass equations for Alnus glutinosa and Betula pubescens misestimate carbon stocks at peatland sites?

description: Additional file 5: Results of the Tukey-HSD test for carbon stocks by site type: Additional file 5 displays the results of the Tukey-HSD test comparing the C stock results of equations which were parametrised for peatland or mineral plots for significant differences. The species for which the differences were tested is listed in “species”. Column “contrast” shows which site type was tested against which, where “yes” means the equation was parametrised for peatland, “no” means the equation was parametrised for forests on mineral soils and “partly” refers to equations that were developed with data from mineral and peatland sites. The column “term” displays the variable the groups originate from, in this case the equations peat status (“peat”). Further, the table contains the difference in means (“diff”), the confidence levels (“conf.low”, “conf.high”) and the adjusted p-values (“adj.p.value”) for all possible pairs.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31005801
title: Additional file 6 of Do current biomass equations for Alnus glutinosa and Betula pubescens misestimate carbon stocks at peatland sites?

description: Additional file 6: Results of the Welch Two Sample t-test and Wilcoxon rank sum test comparing the tree height by diameter class: Additional file 6 displays the results of statistical tests comparing the measured tree heights (H) in m grouped by diameter class (“DBH_class”) for Alnus glutinosa and Betula pubescens (“species”), DBH classes were assigned in steps of 10 cm (e.g. class 10: 0-10 cm, class 20: 10-20 cm). Further, the table contains the difference in means (“diff”), the adjusted p-values (“adj.p.value”) and the test used for the comparison, depending on the distribution of the data in the DBH class (“method”).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31005801.v1
title: Additional file 6 of Do current biomass equations for Alnus glutinosa and Betula pubescens misestimate carbon stocks at peatland sites?

description: Additional file 6: Results of the Welch Two Sample t-test and Wilcoxon rank sum test comparing the tree height by diameter class: Additional file 6 displays the results of statistical tests comparing the measured tree heights (H) in m grouped by diameter class (“DBH_class”) for Alnus glutinosa and Betula pubescens (“species”), DBH classes were assigned in steps of 10 cm (e.g. class 10: 0-10 cm, class 20: 10-20 cm). Further, the table contains the difference in means (“diff”), the adjusted p-values (“adj.p.value”) and the test used for the comparison, depending on the distribution of the data in the DBH class (“method”).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31005802
title: Additional file 1 of PRIME: an interpretable artificial intelligence model based on liquid biopsy improves prediction of progression risk in non-small cell lung cancer

description: Additional file 1. Table S1 Baseline characteristics of patients from all cohorts (n = 493). Table S2 Clinical, treatment and ctDNA data for patients in the NCC-1 cohort (n = 105). Table S3 Clinical, treatment and ctDNA data for patients in the NCC-2 cohort (n = 103). Table S4 Clinical, treatment and ctDNA data for patients in the Stanford cohort (n = 37). Table S5 Clinical, treatment and ctDNA data patients in the LUCID cohort (n = 100). Table S6 Clinical, treatment and ctDNA data for patients in the TRACERx cohort (n = 100). Table S7 Clinical, treatment, and ctDNA data for patients in the Moding et al. cohort (n = 48). Table S8 Mutational data of patients in the NCC-1 cohort (n = 105). Table S9 Mutational data of patients in the NCC-2 cohort (n = 103). Table S10 Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients in the training set and validation set. Table S11 The VIF for each feature in the logistic regression analysis. Table S12 Baseline information and variants data for patients in the TCGA WES/WGS validation cohort (n = 430). Table S13 Missing data summary in the training set (n = 345). Table S14 F1-score, accuracy, precision, and recall for each model. Table S15 Generalized linear mixedeffects model of disease progression across different ctDNA detection techniques.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31005802.v1
title: Additional file 1 of PRIME: an interpretable artificial intelligence model based on liquid biopsy improves prediction of progression risk in non-small cell lung cancer

description: Additional file 1. Table S1 Baseline characteristics of patients from all cohorts (n = 493). Table S2 Clinical, treatment and ctDNA data for patients in the NCC-1 cohort (n = 105). Table S3 Clinical, treatment and ctDNA data for patients in the NCC-2 cohort (n = 103). Table S4 Clinical, treatment and ctDNA data for patients in the Stanford cohort (n = 37). Table S5 Clinical, treatment and ctDNA data patients in the LUCID cohort (n = 100). Table S6 Clinical, treatment and ctDNA data for patients in the TRACERx cohort (n = 100). Table S7 Clinical, treatment, and ctDNA data for patients in the Moding et al. cohort (n = 48). Table S8 Mutational data of patients in the NCC-1 cohort (n = 105). Table S9 Mutational data of patients in the NCC-2 cohort (n = 103). Table S10 Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients in the training set and validation set. Table S11 The VIF for each feature in the logistic regression analysis. Table S12 Baseline information and variants data for patients in the TCGA WES/WGS validation cohort (n = 430). Table S13 Missing data summary in the training set (n = 345). Table S14 F1-score, accuracy, precision, and recall for each model. Table S15 Generalized linear mixedeffects model of disease progression across different ctDNA detection techniques.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31005804
title: Additional file 7 of Do current biomass equations for Alnus glutinosa and Betula pubescens misestimate carbon stocks at peatland sites?

description: Additional file 7: Results of the Tukey-HSD test for individual tree woody aboveground biomass (WAG) by diameter class: Additional file 6 displays the results of the Tukey-HSD test comparing the woody aboveground biomass (WAG) in $$kg~tree~^{-1}$$ calcualted by 41, DEU to the overall mean WAG grouped by diameter class (“DBH_class”) for Betula pubescens (“species”). DBH classes were assigned in steps of 10 cm (e.g. class 10: 0-10 cm, class 20: 10-20 cm). “ $$n\_ha$$ ” is the number of trees per hectare, “ $$BA\_m2\_ha$$ ” is the basal area in $$m^{2}$$ per hectare, “ $$B\_t\_ha\_41\_DEU$$ ” displays the mean biomass in tons per hectare calculated by 41, DEU and “ $$B\_t\_ha\_all\_eq$$ ” the overall mean biomass per hectare across all equations. Further, the table contains the difference in means (“diff”), the confidence levels (“conf.low”, “conf.high”) and the adjusted p-values (“adj.p.value”) for all possible pairs.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31005804.v1
title: Additional file 7 of Do current biomass equations for Alnus glutinosa and Betula pubescens misestimate carbon stocks at peatland sites?

description: Additional file 7: Results of the Tukey-HSD test for individual tree woody aboveground biomass (WAG) by diameter class: Additional file 6 displays the results of the Tukey-HSD test comparing the woody aboveground biomass (WAG) in $$kg~tree~^{-1}$$ calcualted by 41, DEU to the overall mean WAG grouped by diameter class (“DBH_class”) for Betula pubescens (“species”). DBH classes were assigned in steps of 10 cm (e.g. class 10: 0-10 cm, class 20: 10-20 cm). “ $$n\_ha$$ ” is the number of trees per hectare, “ $$BA\_m2\_ha$$ ” is the basal area in $$m^{2}$$ per hectare, “ $$B\_t\_ha\_41\_DEU$$ ” displays the mean biomass in tons per hectare calculated by 41, DEU and “ $$B\_t\_ha\_all\_eq$$ ” the overall mean biomass per hectare across all equations. Further, the table contains the difference in means (“diff”), the confidence levels (“conf.low”, “conf.high”) and the adjusted p-values (“adj.p.value”) for all possible pairs.
DOI: 10.15156/bio/sh0060749.10fu
title: SH0060749.10FU

description: UNITE provides a unified way for delimiting, identifying, communicating, and working with DNA-based Species Hypotheses (SH). All fungal ITS sequences in the international nucleotide sequence databases are clustered to approximately the species level by applying a set of dynamic distance values (<0.5 - 3.0%). All species hypotheses are given a unique, stable name in the form of a DOI, and their taxonomic and ecological annotations are verified through distributed, web-based third-party annotation efforts. SHs are connected to a taxon name and its classification as far as possible (phylum, class, order, etc.) by taking into account identifications for all sequences in the SH. An automatically or manually designated sequence is chosen to represent each such SH. These sequences are released (https://unite.ut.ee/repository.php) for use by the scientific community in, for example, local sequence similarity searches and next-generation sequencing analysis pipelines. The system and the data are updated automatically as the number of public fungal ITS sequences grows.
DOI: 10.15156/bio/sh0060750.10fu
title: SH0060750.10FU

description: UNITE provides a unified way for delimiting, identifying, communicating, and working with DNA-based Species Hypotheses (SH). All fungal ITS sequences in the international nucleotide sequence databases are clustered to approximately the species level by applying a set of dynamic distance values (<0.5 - 3.0%). All species hypotheses are given a unique, stable name in the form of a DOI, and their taxonomic and ecological annotations are verified through distributed, web-based third-party annotation efforts. SHs are connected to a taxon name and its classification as far as possible (phylum, class, order, etc.) by taking into account identifications for all sequences in the SH. An automatically or manually designated sequence is chosen to represent each such SH. These sequences are released (https://unite.ut.ee/repository.php) for use by the scientific community in, for example, local sequence similarity searches and next-generation sequencing analysis pipelines. The system and the data are updated automatically as the number of public fungal ITS sequences grows.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.30703250
title: Additional file 1 of Population genetic diversity and natural Wolbachia infection in Aedes aegypti from Pakistan

description: Supplementary Material 1: Table S1. Country-wise distribution and GenBank accession numbers of Ae. aegypti COI sequences used in this study. This table includes 166 COI sequences: 68 newly generated and 98 retrieved from GenBank.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.30703250.v2
title: Additional file 1 of Population genetic diversity and natural Wolbachia infection in Aedes aegypti from Pakistan

description: Supplementary Material 1: Table S1. Country-wise distribution and GenBank accession numbers of Ae. aegypti COI sequences used in this study. This table includes 166 COI sequences: 68 newly generated and 98 retrieved from GenBank.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.30703250.v1
title: Additional file 1 of Population genetic diversity and natural Wolbachia infection in Aedes aegypti from Pakistan

description: Supplementary Material 1: Table S1. Country-wise distribution and GenBank accession numbers of Ae. aegypti COI sequences used in this study. This table includes 166 COI sequences: 68 newly generated and 98 retrieved from GenBank.