cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.15468/dl.3jax7v
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 1169 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "TaxonKey is Phoracantha recurva Newman, 1840",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 1169 records from 40 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0001271-241107131044228/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.446ack
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 1870 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "TaxonKey is Combretum zeyheri Sond.",
 "Continent is Africa"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 1870 records from 55 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0001272-241107131044228/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14053108
title: Table 1 in First insights into past biodiversity of giraffes based on mitochondrial sequences from museum specimens

description: Table 1. Currently accepted giraffe subspecies (Muller et al. 2018) with their synonyms (modified after Shorrocks 2016).
SubspeciesDescriptionType specimenType localitySynonymscamelopardalisLinnaeus 1758Living giraffe illustrated by Belon du Mans (1553), never deposited in a museum collection.Sennar (Sudan) and EthiopiaCamelopardalis biturigum Duvernoy, 1844 Camelopardalis aethiopica Ogilby, 1837 Giraffa camelopardalis typica Bryden, 1899giraffaBoddaert 1784Specimens of the Prince of Orange Museum (The Hague) and of Vosmaer (1787) (Museum Leiden), Netherlands.Cape of Good Hope, South AfricaCamelopardalis capensis Lesson, 1842 Camelopardalis australis Swainson, 1835 Camelopardalis maculata Weinland, 1863 Giraffa camelopardalis wardi Lydekker, 1904antiquorumJardine 1835SMF-498: unspec. type and SMF-497: paratypeSouth of Darfour, SudanGiraffa camelopardalis senaariensis Trouessart, 1898 Giraffa camelopardalis congoensis Lydekker, 1903peraltaThomas 1898NHMUK-1898.2.18.1Lokoja junction Niger and Benue rivers, Nigeria–tippelskirchiMatschie 1898ZMB-084951 (syntype); second specimen might be considered lostLake Eyasi, TanzaniaGiraffa schillingsi Matschie, 1898reticulatade Winton 1899NHMUK-18971.30.1Loroghi Mountains, KenyaGiraffa hagenbecki Knottnerus-Meyer, 1910 Giraffa reticulata nigrescens Lydekker, 1911 Giraffa camelopardalis australis Rhoads, 1896rothschildiLydekker 1903NHMUK-1903.4.15.1Guasin-gisha Plateau east of Mount Elgon, KenyaGiraffa camelopardalis cottoni Lydekker, 1904angolensisLydekker 1903NHMUK- 1939.480Cunene River, AngolaGiraffa camelopardalis infumata Noack, 1908thornicroftiLydekker 1911NHMUK-1910.10.17.1Petauke district, Zambia–
description: Published as part of Petzold, Alice, Magnant, Anne-Sophie, Edderai, David, Chardonnet, Bertrand, Rigoulet, Jacques, Saint-Jalme, Michel & Hassanin, Alexandre, 2020, First insights into past biodiversity of giraffes based on mitochondrial sequences from museum specimens, pp. 4 in European Journal of Taxonomy 703 on page 4, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.703, http://zenodo.org/record/3989669
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14053109
title: Table 1 in First insights into past biodiversity of giraffes based on mitochondrial sequences from museum specimens

description: Table 1. Currently accepted giraffe subspecies (Muller et al. 2018) with their synonyms (modified after Shorrocks 2016).
SubspeciesDescriptionType specimenType localitySynonymscamelopardalisLinnaeus 1758Living giraffe illustrated by Belon du Mans (1553), never deposited in a museum collection.Sennar (Sudan) and EthiopiaCamelopardalis biturigum Duvernoy, 1844 Camelopardalis aethiopica Ogilby, 1837 Giraffa camelopardalis typica Bryden, 1899giraffaBoddaert 1784Specimens of the Prince of Orange Museum (The Hague) and of Vosmaer (1787) (Museum Leiden), Netherlands.Cape of Good Hope, South AfricaCamelopardalis capensis Lesson, 1842 Camelopardalis australis Swainson, 1835 Camelopardalis maculata Weinland, 1863 Giraffa camelopardalis wardi Lydekker, 1904antiquorumJardine 1835SMF-498: unspec. type and SMF-497: paratypeSouth of Darfour, SudanGiraffa camelopardalis senaariensis Trouessart, 1898 Giraffa camelopardalis congoensis Lydekker, 1903peraltaThomas 1898NHMUK-1898.2.18.1Lokoja junction Niger and Benue rivers, Nigeria–tippelskirchiMatschie 1898ZMB-084951 (syntype); second specimen might be considered lostLake Eyasi, TanzaniaGiraffa schillingsi Matschie, 1898reticulatade Winton 1899NHMUK-18971.30.1Loroghi Mountains, KenyaGiraffa hagenbecki Knottnerus-Meyer, 1910 Giraffa reticulata nigrescens Lydekker, 1911 Giraffa camelopardalis australis Rhoads, 1896rothschildiLydekker 1903NHMUK-1903.4.15.1Guasin-gisha Plateau east of Mount Elgon, KenyaGiraffa camelopardalis cottoni Lydekker, 1904angolensisLydekker 1903NHMUK- 1939.480Cunene River, AngolaGiraffa camelopardalis infumata Noack, 1908thornicroftiLydekker 1911NHMUK-1910.10.17.1Petauke district, Zambia–
description: Published as part of Petzold, Alice, Magnant, Anne-Sophie, Edderai, David, Chardonnet, Bertrand, Rigoulet, Jacques, Saint-Jalme, Michel & Hassanin, Alexandre, 2020, First insights into past biodiversity of giraffes based on mitochondrial sequences from museum specimens, pp. 4 in European Journal of Taxonomy 703 on page 4, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.703, http://zenodo.org/record/3989669
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14053110
title: Table 2 in First insights into past biodiversity of giraffes based on mitochondrial sequences from museum specimens

description: Table 2. Museum specimens sequenced in this study (subspecies assignations have been made by morphological characters or distribution range). DRC = Democratic Republic of the Congo; SA = South Africa.
VoucherSubspeciesCollector, DateLocalityN° AccessionIRSNB-IG19076?Unknown, 1953Anglo-Egyptian Sudan (Sudan / South Sudan)MT542052MNHN-A10753peralta?Gérardin, 1830Bakel, SenegalMT542037MNHN-A10617peralta?Gérardin, 1830Bakel, SenegalMT542038MNHN-1896-45capensisDelalande, 1818–1820Cape of Good Hope (SA)MT542039MNHN-A10749capensisDelalande, 1818–1820Cape of Good Hope (SA)MT542040MNHN-A7977capensisLevaillant, 1783–1785Cape of Good Hope (SA)MT542041MNHN-1845-211camelopardalisMouker Bey, 1824Sennar (Sudan)MT542042MNHN-A8012camelopardalisClot Bey, 1843Abyssinia (Ethiopia)MT542043MNHN-1913-523tippelskirchi?Babault, 1912–1913KenyaMT542054MHNT-1996. 121. 2camelopardalisUnknown, 1843Abyssinia (Ethiopia)MT542044RMCA-21645MantiquorumHuese, 1953Sarh, ChadMT542046RMCA-25672McongoensisPoll, 1959Gangala, DRCMT542047RMCA-25673McongoensisPoll, 1959Gangala, DRCMT542048RMCA-83. 006- M0553congoensisColyn, 1946Garamba Park, DRCMT542049RMCA-3748McongoensisDe Calonne, 1914Kapili, DRCMT542050RMCA-767McottoniPowell-Cotton, 1908Lado enclave, northwest Uganda and South SudanMT542051RMCA-5956McongoensisPilette, 1923North-East Uele, DRCMT542053RMCA-2128MtippelskirchiBayer, 1913Serengeti-Mara, KenyaMT542055ZMB-48222?UnknownDikoa, NigeriaMT542045
description: Published as part of Petzold, Alice, Magnant, Anne-Sophie, Edderai, David, Chardonnet, Bertrand, Rigoulet, Jacques, Saint-Jalme, Michel & Hassanin, Alexandre, 2020, First insights into past biodiversity of giraffes based on mitochondrial sequences from museum specimens, pp. 7 in European Journal of Taxonomy 703 on page 7, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.703, http://zenodo.org/record/3989669
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14053111
title: Table 2 in First insights into past biodiversity of giraffes based on mitochondrial sequences from museum specimens

description: Table 2. Museum specimens sequenced in this study (subspecies assignations have been made by morphological characters or distribution range). DRC = Democratic Republic of the Congo; SA = South Africa.
VoucherSubspeciesCollector, DateLocalityN° AccessionIRSNB-IG19076?Unknown, 1953Anglo-Egyptian Sudan (Sudan / South Sudan)MT542052MNHN-A10753peralta?Gérardin, 1830Bakel, SenegalMT542037MNHN-A10617peralta?Gérardin, 1830Bakel, SenegalMT542038MNHN-1896-45capensisDelalande, 1818–1820Cape of Good Hope (SA)MT542039MNHN-A10749capensisDelalande, 1818–1820Cape of Good Hope (SA)MT542040MNHN-A7977capensisLevaillant, 1783–1785Cape of Good Hope (SA)MT542041MNHN-1845-211camelopardalisMouker Bey, 1824Sennar (Sudan)MT542042MNHN-A8012camelopardalisClot Bey, 1843Abyssinia (Ethiopia)MT542043MNHN-1913-523tippelskirchi?Babault, 1912–1913KenyaMT542054MHNT-1996. 121. 2camelopardalisUnknown, 1843Abyssinia (Ethiopia)MT542044RMCA-21645MantiquorumHuese, 1953Sarh, ChadMT542046RMCA-25672McongoensisPoll, 1959Gangala, DRCMT542047RMCA-25673McongoensisPoll, 1959Gangala, DRCMT542048RMCA-83. 006- M0553congoensisColyn, 1946Garamba Park, DRCMT542049RMCA-3748McongoensisDe Calonne, 1914Kapili, DRCMT542050RMCA-767McottoniPowell-Cotton, 1908Lado enclave, northwest Uganda and South SudanMT542051RMCA-5956McongoensisPilette, 1923North-East Uele, DRCMT542053RMCA-2128MtippelskirchiBayer, 1913Serengeti-Mara, KenyaMT542055ZMB-48222?UnknownDikoa, NigeriaMT542045
description: Published as part of Petzold, Alice, Magnant, Anne-Sophie, Edderai, David, Chardonnet, Bertrand, Rigoulet, Jacques, Saint-Jalme, Michel & Hassanin, Alexandre, 2020, First insights into past biodiversity of giraffes based on mitochondrial sequences from museum specimens, pp. 7 in European Journal of Taxonomy 703 on page 7, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.703, http://zenodo.org/record/3989669
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14053112
title: Table 3 in First insights into past biodiversity of giraffes based on mitochondrial sequences from museum specimens

description: Table 3. Minimum and maximum pairwise distances (in %), as well as mean distance (between brackets), calculated using the mtDNA-91T dataset both within and between haplogroups (Fig. 3). Boldface = maximal intrapopulational variation.
TaxaI.II.III.IV.V.VI.VII.VIII.IX.X.XI.I. Nubia0. 17II. Senegal1.38 – 1.5 (1.44)0III. Niger1.09 – 1.47 (1.24)1.74 – 1.93 (1.82)0. 26IV. Kordofan I0.75 – 1.14 (0.96)1.67 – 1.78 (1.7)1.28 – 1.67 (1.41)0. 52V. Kordofan II1.22 – 1.41 (1.32)1.991.67 – 1.86 (1.75)0.9 – 1.15 (0.98)0VI. Rothschild1.15 – 1.73 (1.35)1.49 – 2 (1.68)1.21 – 1.67 (1.35)1.21 – 1.67 (1.48)1.48 – 1.67 (1.58)0. 58VII. Reticulated I1.54 – 1.99 (1.69)1.55 – 1.87 (1.75)1.48 – 2.19 (1.74)1.48 – 2.12 (1.68)1.8 – 2.06 (1.89)1.35 – 1.99 (1.60)1. 16VIII. Masai I3.75 – 3.87 (3.82)4.13 – 4.13 (4.13)3.99 – 4.13 (4.05)3.68 – 3.93 (3.80)4.12 – 4.12 (4.12)3.81 – 4.26 (4.01)3.81 – 4.07 (4.00)0IX. Masai II3.73 – 3.99 (3.85)4.08 – 4.26 (4.17)3.92 – 4.25 (4.04)3.50 – 3.91 (3.74)4.05 – 4.24 (4.11)3.85 – 4.37 (4.03)3.86 – 4.31 (4.03)0.31 – 0.94 (076)0. 98X. Southeast Africa4.12 – 4.31 (4.21)4.26 – 4.45 (4.34)4.31 – 4.69 (4.46)4.18 – 4.63 (4.32)4.44 – 4.63 (4.51)4.18 – 4.63 (4.35)4.12 – 4.57 (4.37)1.35 – 1.54 (1.43)1.29 – 1.56 (1.40)0. 32XI. Southwestern3.13 – 3.73 (3.52)3.49 – 4.12 (3.95)3.53 – 4.11 (3.80)3.07 – 3.86 (3.58)3.66 – 4.11 (3.91)3.54 – 4.31 (3.94)3.73 – 4.24 (3.95)2.64 – 2.9 (2.78)2.48 – 3.09 (2.80)3.02 – 3.41 (3.16)0. 65
description: Published as part of Petzold, Alice, Magnant, Anne-Sophie, Edderai, David, Chardonnet, Bertrand, Rigoulet, Jacques, Saint-Jalme, Michel & Hassanin, Alexandre, 2020, First insights into past biodiversity of giraffes based on mitochondrial sequences from museum specimens, pp. 14 in European Journal of Taxonomy 703 on page 14, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.703, http://zenodo.org/record/3989669
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14053113
title: Table 3 in First insights into past biodiversity of giraffes based on mitochondrial sequences from museum specimens

description: Table 3. Minimum and maximum pairwise distances (in %), as well as mean distance (between brackets), calculated using the mtDNA-91T dataset both within and between haplogroups (Fig. 3). Boldface = maximal intrapopulational variation.
TaxaI.II.III.IV.V.VI.VII.VIII.IX.X.XI.I. Nubia0. 17II. Senegal1.38 – 1.5 (1.44)0III. Niger1.09 – 1.47 (1.24)1.74 – 1.93 (1.82)0. 26IV. Kordofan I0.75 – 1.14 (0.96)1.67 – 1.78 (1.7)1.28 – 1.67 (1.41)0. 52V. Kordofan II1.22 – 1.41 (1.32)1.991.67 – 1.86 (1.75)0.9 – 1.15 (0.98)0VI. Rothschild1.15 – 1.73 (1.35)1.49 – 2 (1.68)1.21 – 1.67 (1.35)1.21 – 1.67 (1.48)1.48 – 1.67 (1.58)0. 58VII. Reticulated I1.54 – 1.99 (1.69)1.55 – 1.87 (1.75)1.48 – 2.19 (1.74)1.48 – 2.12 (1.68)1.8 – 2.06 (1.89)1.35 – 1.99 (1.60)1. 16VIII. Masai I3.75 – 3.87 (3.82)4.13 – 4.13 (4.13)3.99 – 4.13 (4.05)3.68 – 3.93 (3.80)4.12 – 4.12 (4.12)3.81 – 4.26 (4.01)3.81 – 4.07 (4.00)0IX. Masai II3.73 – 3.99 (3.85)4.08 – 4.26 (4.17)3.92 – 4.25 (4.04)3.50 – 3.91 (3.74)4.05 – 4.24 (4.11)3.85 – 4.37 (4.03)3.86 – 4.31 (4.03)0.31 – 0.94 (076)0. 98X. Southeast Africa4.12 – 4.31 (4.21)4.26 – 4.45 (4.34)4.31 – 4.69 (4.46)4.18 – 4.63 (4.32)4.44 – 4.63 (4.51)4.18 – 4.63 (4.35)4.12 – 4.57 (4.37)1.35 – 1.54 (1.43)1.29 – 1.56 (1.40)0. 32XI. Southwestern3.13 – 3.73 (3.52)3.49 – 4.12 (3.95)3.53 – 4.11 (3.80)3.07 – 3.86 (3.58)3.66 – 4.11 (3.91)3.54 – 4.31 (3.94)3.73 – 4.24 (3.95)2.64 – 2.9 (2.78)2.48 – 3.09 (2.80)3.02 – 3.41 (3.16)0. 65
description: Published as part of Petzold, Alice, Magnant, Anne-Sophie, Edderai, David, Chardonnet, Bertrand, Rigoulet, Jacques, Saint-Jalme, Michel & Hassanin, Alexandre, 2020, First insights into past biodiversity of giraffes based on mitochondrial sequences from museum specimens, pp. 14 in European Journal of Taxonomy 703 on page 14, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.703, http://zenodo.org/record/3989669
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14053114
title: Table 4 in First insights into past biodiversity of giraffes based on mitochondrial sequences from museum specimens

description: Table 4. Minimum and maximum pairwise distances (in %), as well as mean distance (between brackets), calculated using the nuDNA-78T dataset both within and between haplogroups (Fig. 3). Boldface = maximal intrapopulational variation.
TaxaI.II.III.IV.V.VI.VII.VIII.IX.I. Niger0. 09II. Kordofan I0.03 – 0.11 (0.06)0. 04III. Kordofan II0.08 – 0.12 (0.1)0.04 – 0.05 (0.04)0IV. Rothschild0.04 – 0.21 (0.08)0.02 – 0.17 (0.07)0.05 – 0.2 (0.09)0. 2V. Reticulated I0.05 – 0.27 (0.15)0.02 – 0.21 (0.14)0.08 – 0.23 (0.18)0 – 0.25 (0.13)0. 12VI. Masai I0.40 – 0.47 (0.44)0.40 – 0.49 (0.44)0.46 – 0.48 (0.47)0.38 – 0.5 (0.44)0.32 – 0.47 (0.41)0VII. Masai II0.4 – 0.46 (0.44)0.44 – 0.47 (0.45)0.46 – 0.46 (0.46)0.38 – 0.49 (0.44)0.32 – 0.46 (0.40)0.02 – 0.06 (0.04)0. 04VIII. Southeast Africa0.44 – 0.56 (0.51)0.46 – 0.58 (0.51)0.52 – 0.57 (0.54)0.44 – 0.59 (0.51)0.36 – 0.54 (0.46)0.28 – 0.4 (0.35)0.28 – 0.38 (0.34)0. 08IX. Southwestern0.43 – 0.57 (0.51)0.45 – 0.59 (0.52)0.5 – 0.59 (0.55)0.42 – 0.6 (0.52)0.35 – 0.55 (0.47)0.27 – 0.41 (0.34)0.27 – 0.39 (0.34)0 – 0.12 (0.05)0. 14
description: Published as part of Petzold, Alice, Magnant, Anne-Sophie, Edderai, David, Chardonnet, Bertrand, Rigoulet, Jacques, Saint-Jalme, Michel & Hassanin, Alexandre, 2020, First insights into past biodiversity of giraffes based on mitochondrial sequences from museum specimens, pp. 15 in European Journal of Taxonomy 703 on page 15, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.703, http://zenodo.org/record/3989669
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14053115
title: Table 4 in First insights into past biodiversity of giraffes based on mitochondrial sequences from museum specimens

description: Table 4. Minimum and maximum pairwise distances (in %), as well as mean distance (between brackets), calculated using the nuDNA-78T dataset both within and between haplogroups (Fig. 3). Boldface = maximal intrapopulational variation.
TaxaI.II.III.IV.V.VI.VII.VIII.IX.I. Niger0. 09II. Kordofan I0.03 – 0.11 (0.06)0. 04III. Kordofan II0.08 – 0.12 (0.1)0.04 – 0.05 (0.04)0IV. Rothschild0.04 – 0.21 (0.08)0.02 – 0.17 (0.07)0.05 – 0.2 (0.09)0. 2V. Reticulated I0.05 – 0.27 (0.15)0.02 – 0.21 (0.14)0.08 – 0.23 (0.18)0 – 0.25 (0.13)0. 12VI. Masai I0.40 – 0.47 (0.44)0.40 – 0.49 (0.44)0.46 – 0.48 (0.47)0.38 – 0.5 (0.44)0.32 – 0.47 (0.41)0VII. Masai II0.4 – 0.46 (0.44)0.44 – 0.47 (0.45)0.46 – 0.46 (0.46)0.38 – 0.49 (0.44)0.32 – 0.46 (0.40)0.02 – 0.06 (0.04)0. 04VIII. Southeast Africa0.44 – 0.56 (0.51)0.46 – 0.58 (0.51)0.52 – 0.57 (0.54)0.44 – 0.59 (0.51)0.36 – 0.54 (0.46)0.28 – 0.4 (0.35)0.28 – 0.38 (0.34)0. 08IX. Southwestern0.43 – 0.57 (0.51)0.45 – 0.59 (0.52)0.5 – 0.59 (0.55)0.42 – 0.6 (0.52)0.35 – 0.55 (0.47)0.27 – 0.41 (0.34)0.27 – 0.39 (0.34)0 – 0.12 (0.05)0. 14
description: Published as part of Petzold, Alice, Magnant, Anne-Sophie, Edderai, David, Chardonnet, Bertrand, Rigoulet, Jacques, Saint-Jalme, Michel & Hassanin, Alexandre, 2020, First insights into past biodiversity of giraffes based on mitochondrial sequences from museum specimens, pp. 15 in European Journal of Taxonomy 703 on page 15, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.703, http://zenodo.org/record/3989669
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14053116
title: Table 1 in Exogenous application of polyamines alleviates water stress-induced oxidative stress of Rosa damascena Miller var. trigintipetala Dieck

description: Table 1 Effects of foliar application of spermine (Spm) and spermidine (Spd) on growth characters of Rosa damascena Miller var. trigintipetala Dieck plant grown under water stress (50% FC) or non-stress (100%FC) conditions.
TreatmentsPlant height (cm)Plant FW (g)Plant DW (g)100% FCControl47.10 ± 0.85b37.80 ± 0.72b12.68 ± 0.45b0.5 mM Spm50.78 ± 0.38a45.77 ± 1.66a17.82 ± 0.64a0.5 mM Spd51.21 ± 1.07a44.71 ± 0.50a16.59 ± 0.52a50% FCControl35.75 ± 0.66d28.73 ± 0.64e10.35 ± 0.59d0.5 mM Spm45.45 ± 0.78b35.45 ± 1.72c12.78 ± 0.27b0.5 mM Spd43.78 ± 0.70c33.67 ± 2.08d12.38 ± 0.15b
Values are means ± S.D. (n = 8). Means within a column with different letters are significantly different from each other according to Duncan multiple range test at P = 0.05.
description: Published as part of Hassan, F. A. S., Ali, E. F. & Alamer, K. H., 2018, Exogenous application of polyamines alleviates water stress-induced oxidative stress of Rosa damascena Miller var. trigintipetala Dieck, pp. 98 in South African Journal of Botany 116 (10) on page 98, DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2018.02.399, http://zenodo.org/record/14036711
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14053117
title: Table 1 in Exogenous application of polyamines alleviates water stress-induced oxidative stress of Rosa damascena Miller var. trigintipetala Dieck

description: Table 1 Effects of foliar application of spermine (Spm) and spermidine (Spd) on growth characters of Rosa damascena Miller var. trigintipetala Dieck plant grown under water stress (50% FC) or non-stress (100%FC) conditions.
TreatmentsPlant height (cm)Plant FW (g)Plant DW (g)100% FCControl47.10 ± 0.85b37.80 ± 0.72b12.68 ± 0.45b0.5 mM Spm50.78 ± 0.38a45.77 ± 1.66a17.82 ± 0.64a0.5 mM Spd51.21 ± 1.07a44.71 ± 0.50a16.59 ± 0.52a50% FCControl35.75 ± 0.66d28.73 ± 0.64e10.35 ± 0.59d0.5 mM Spm45.45 ± 0.78b35.45 ± 1.72c12.78 ± 0.27b0.5 mM Spd43.78 ± 0.70c33.67 ± 2.08d12.38 ± 0.15b
Values are means ± S.D. (n = 8). Means within a column with different letters are significantly different from each other according to Duncan multiple range test at P = 0.05.
description: Published as part of Hassan, F. A. S., Ali, E. F. & Alamer, K. H., 2018, Exogenous application of polyamines alleviates water stress-induced oxidative stress of Rosa damascena Miller var. trigintipetala Dieck, pp. 98 in South African Journal of Botany 116 (10) on page 98, DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2018.02.399, http://zenodo.org/record/14036711
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14053118
title: Table 1 in Antioxidant and anticholinesterase potential of Ferulago cassia with farther bio-guided isolation of active coumarin constituents *

description: Table 1 Sums of the crushed aerial parts, roots, flowers and fruits and gained extracts and fractions.
SpeciesExtracts/FractionsAerial partRootFlowerFruitFerulago cassiaMeOH (g)32.1230.0226.9329.77Hexane (g)3.692.373.383.40CH2Cl2 (g)11.9115.019.8210.18EtOAc (g)2.762.281.962.54BuOH (g)5.994.554.516.08Aqueous residue (g)6.925.696.306.23Lyophilized aqueous (g)4.743.984.875.56
description: Published as part of Karakaya, S., Koca, M., Sytar, O., Dursunoglu, B., Ozbek, H., Duman, H., Guvenalp, Z. & Kılıc, C. S., 2019, Antioxidant and anticholinesterase potential of Ferulago cassia with farther bio-guided isolation of active coumarin constituents *, pp. 537 in South African Journal of Botany 121 (10) on page 537, DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2019.01.020, http://zenodo.org/record/14036722
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14053119
title: Table 1 in Antioxidant and anticholinesterase potential of Ferulago cassia with farther bio-guided isolation of active coumarin constituents *

description: Table 1 Sums of the crushed aerial parts, roots, flowers and fruits and gained extracts and fractions.
SpeciesExtracts/FractionsAerial partRootFlowerFruitFerulago cassiaMeOH (g)32.1230.0226.9329.77Hexane (g)3.692.373.383.40CH2Cl2 (g)11.9115.019.8210.18EtOAc (g)2.762.281.962.54BuOH (g)5.994.554.516.08Aqueous residue (g)6.925.696.306.23Lyophilized aqueous (g)4.743.984.875.56
description: Published as part of Karakaya, S., Koca, M., Sytar, O., Dursunoglu, B., Ozbek, H., Duman, H., Guvenalp, Z. & Kılıc, C. S., 2019, Antioxidant and anticholinesterase potential of Ferulago cassia with farther bio-guided isolation of active coumarin constituents *, pp. 537 in South African Journal of Botany 121 (10) on page 537, DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2019.01.020, http://zenodo.org/record/14036722
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14053120
title: Table 2 in Antioxidant and anticholinesterase potential of Ferulago cassia with farther bio-guided isolation of active coumarin constituents *

description: Table 2 Antioxidant activities of the samples from Ferulago cassia in TBA test.
Tested samplesIC50 values (μg/mL) ± SD*Aerial partRootFlowerFruitMeOH195.42 ± 4.2592.21 ± 3.44178.31 ± 4.33155.67 ± 3.66Hexane500>500>500>500>CH2Cl285.66 ± 5.0243.10 ± 2.23101.13 ± 2.3452.45 ± 1.67EtOAc145.65 ± 2.57112.10 ± 3.47181.21 ± 1.0694.91 ± 3.41BuOH345.21 ± 4.30471.31 ± 4.91383.23 ± 2.43276.51 ± 1.66Aqueous residue500>500>500>500>Lyophilized aqueous500>464.89 ± 2.09489 ± 3.28356 ± 1.93Peucedanol18.12 ± 2.80Suberosin23.54 ± 2.43Grandivitinol61.11 ± 4.23Umbelliferone79.53 ± 3.98Chlorogenic acid12.98 ± 4.89Propyl gallate3.44 ± 2.05Rutin9.65 ± 3.09
* Standard deviation.
description: Published as part of Karakaya, S., Koca, M., Sytar, O., Dursunoglu, B., Ozbek, H., Duman, H., Guvenalp, Z. & Kılıc, C. S., 2019, Antioxidant and anticholinesterase potential of Ferulago cassia with farther bio-guided isolation of active coumarin constituents *, pp. 539 in South African Journal of Botany 121 (10) on page 539, DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2019.01.020, http://zenodo.org/record/14036722
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14053121
title: Table 2 in Antioxidant and anticholinesterase potential of Ferulago cassia with farther bio-guided isolation of active coumarin constituents *

description: Table 2 Antioxidant activities of the samples from Ferulago cassia in TBA test.
Tested samplesIC50 values (μg/mL) ± SD*Aerial partRootFlowerFruitMeOH195.42 ± 4.2592.21 ± 3.44178.31 ± 4.33155.67 ± 3.66Hexane500>500>500>500>CH2Cl285.66 ± 5.0243.10 ± 2.23101.13 ± 2.3452.45 ± 1.67EtOAc145.65 ± 2.57112.10 ± 3.47181.21 ± 1.0694.91 ± 3.41BuOH345.21 ± 4.30471.31 ± 4.91383.23 ± 2.43276.51 ± 1.66Aqueous residue500>500>500>500>Lyophilized aqueous500>464.89 ± 2.09489 ± 3.28356 ± 1.93Peucedanol18.12 ± 2.80Suberosin23.54 ± 2.43Grandivitinol61.11 ± 4.23Umbelliferone79.53 ± 3.98Chlorogenic acid12.98 ± 4.89Propyl gallate3.44 ± 2.05Rutin9.65 ± 3.09
* Standard deviation.
description: Published as part of Karakaya, S., Koca, M., Sytar, O., Dursunoglu, B., Ozbek, H., Duman, H., Guvenalp, Z. & Kılıc, C. S., 2019, Antioxidant and anticholinesterase potential of Ferulago cassia with farther bio-guided isolation of active coumarin constituents *, pp. 539 in South African Journal of Botany 121 (10) on page 539, DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2019.01.020, http://zenodo.org/record/14036722