DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15347819
title: theory of creation  ( STRUCTURE )  [ shape ]   overview   by ANALYZE_EXPERT   PART  2

description: i am sharon prestly   a 16 year old trying to convey my theories .     This is a series of parts which says about the detailed explaination of theory of creation made by me .    this is 2nd part    there were 28 parts to go   

In this 2nd part we briefly explained about how structure itself one of the four major domains in the fundamental aspects of creation in that we talk about one of those subdivision ( shape ) briefly 

 

























 Theory of Creation – Part 2 delves deeper into the metaphysical and structural principles behind all existence. This segment focuses on structure as a fundamental pillar of creation and introduces shape as a vital subdivision. Through philosophical insights and scientific parallels, the work argues that shape is not merely a visual trait but a universal signature found in everything—from atoms to galaxies. With illustrative reasoning and symbolic interpretations, this document reveals how shape influences identity, behavior, and cosmic intent. A must-read for those exploring the intersection of science, spirituality, and creation theory.





 


 




















Zenado: Theory of Creation – Part 2 — The Role of Structure and Shape in the Fabric of Existence

In this profound continuation of the Zenado philosophical framework, Part 2 explores the deeper layers of creation by focusing on structure as one of the most essential foundations of reality. The document proposes that without structure, there can be no existence, no differentiation, and no stability in the universe. Structure is not merely a man-made idea; it is a universal principle that governs how everything is formed, maintained, and evolved—from physical matter to abstract ideas.

A core theme of this part is the identification of “shape” as a primary subdivision of structure. Shape is treated not as a superficial aspect of form but as the visible interface between the internal logic of creation and our perception. It is how structure expresses itself outwardly, enabling both recognition and function. Every object in the universe—from a single atom to a sprawling galaxy—possesses a shape, making it a universal language that links all forms of creation.

The theory also delves into why shape itself is a major aspect of creation. It argues that the nature of a shape affects how an entity behaves, how it interacts with other entities, and how it fulfills its purpose. For instance, a circle might represent continuity and unity, while a triangle implies stability and force distribution. Shapes are not random; they are chosen or formed through underlying principles that reflect intention, balance, and energy dynamics.

To demonstrate the universality of shape, the text provides examples across multiple domains—scientific, natural, philosophical, and symbolic. The circle is highlighted as a recurring motif: it appears in planetary orbits, cells, eyes, cultural symbols, and even in cycles of time. This repetition proves that shape is not limited to a specific field or form—it is embedded in the blueprint of creation itself.

By the end of the document, the reader is led to the conclusion that understanding shape is equivalent to understanding the essence of creation. It is the point where the invisible becomes visible, where the abstract becomes concrete. Shape, as explained in this theory, is not just geometry—it is cosmic grammar, a sacred design, and a vessel of meaning that ties together the infinite diversity of the universe.







 

 

 

FOR    PART 1     [ theory of creation ( concept overview ) by ANALYZE_EXPERT PART 1 ]  =  

                                                           https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15341820

 FOR PART 3 :   https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15354415




 FOR PART 4 :  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15354728

 FOR PART 5 :  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15354947

FOR PART 6 :  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15355133

FOR   PART  7 : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15355814






FOR PART 8 : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15355984

 FOR PART 9 :  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15357380

FOR PART 10 : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15357823

 FOR PART 11 : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15358064

FOR PART 12 :  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15359613

FOR PART 13 : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15362932

FOR PART 14 :  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15363269













FOR PART 15 : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1536408

FOR PART 16 : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15369380

FOR PART 17 : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15372090

FOR PART 18 : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15377930

FOR PART 19 : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15378329





















FOR PART 20 : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15381667

FOR PART 21 : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15381801

FOR PART 22 : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15383268