cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.18712/nsd-nsd2663-v1
title: Norwegian Citizen Panel Wave 1-13, 2013-2018

description: The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company Ideas 2 Evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data. The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates is available at www.medborger.uib.no
DOI: 10.18712/nsd-nsd2664-v1
title: Norwegian Citizen Panel Wave 13, 2018

description: The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company Ideas 2 Evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data. The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates is available at www.medborger.uib.no .
DOI: 10.18712/nsd-nsd2664-v2
title: Norwegian Citizen Panel Round 13, 2018

description: The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian centre for research data (NSD). For access to time series data, or text data, please contact DIGSSCORE. The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at www.medborger.uib.no
DOI: 10.18712/nsd-nsd2664-v3
title: Norwegian Citizen Panel Round 13, 2018

description: The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian centre for research data (NSD). For access to time series data, or text data, please contact DIGSSCORE. The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at www.medborger.uib.no
DOI: 10.18712/nsd-nsd2665-v1
title: SMARTFRYS - Approximately "Fresh" Quality of Meat with New Freeze Technology, 2018

description: Novel freezing solutions are constantly being developed to reduce quality loss in meat production chains. However, there is limited focus on identifying the sensitive analytical tools needed to directly validate product changes that result from potential improvements in freezing technology. To benchmark analytical tools relevant to meat research and production, pork samples were frozen using traditional (-25°C, -35°C) and cryogenic freezing (-196°C). Three classes of analyses were tested for their capacity to separate different freeze treatments: thaw loss testing, bioelectrical spectroscopy (nuclear magnetic resonance, microwave, bioimpedance) and low-temperature microscopy (cryo-SEM). A general effect of freeze treatment was detected with all bioelectrical methods. Yet, only cryo-SEM resolved quality differences between all freeze treatments, not only between cryogenic and traditional freezing. The detection sensitivity with cryo-SEM may be explained by testing meat directly in the frozen state without prior defrosting. Advantages, shortcomings and cost factors in using analytical tools for quality monitoring in the meat sector were discussed. Datasets were obtained using different technical analyses, as specified in the manuscript; including spectroscopic data and imaging data. All files contain data and documents that are linked to individual units and figures of the publication "Detectability of the degree of freeze damage in meat depends on analytic-tool selection".
DOI: 10.18712/nsd-nsd2667-v1
title: Organizing for Societal Security and Crisis Management: Building Governance Capacity and Legitimacy (GOVCAP), 2018

description: The project studied governance capacity and governance legitimacy for societal security and crisis management. The overall research question was: What makes a well performing governmental crisis management system? A well performing administrative structure needs both organizational capacity and legitimacy. The project examined the organization and coordination of government apparatuses; and the public perceptions and attitudes toward societal security, safety and resilience. The trade-off between the capacity for resilience and for emergency preparedness and between societal security and individual rights are central. There is a need of unpacking the field of societal security and crisis management into different types of management situations and crises. There are significant variations across types of crises, for example between natural disasters and terrorism. What is considered exemplary and acceptable capacity and performance may vary. We explored why some cases are considered successful, while others are not, across different countries and cases. The two sets of questions are examined through two interrelated research modules. Module 1 analyzes governance capacity, looking at the structure and performance of government authorities and instruments within the field. A main assumption is that organization and use of different governance tools will affect performance. Module 2 considers governance legitimacy. It analyzes trust in government arrangements for crisis management and societal security, and public assessment of the governments' performance. Being based on collaboration within a international academic research network the project has a strong focus on internationalization and a comparative design, and includes data from five European countries: Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands, Germany and the United Kingdom. For further information about "Organizing for Societal Security and Crisis Management: Building Governance Capacity and Legitimacy (GOVCAP), 2018", please contact the principal investigator.
DOI: 10.18712/nsd-nsd2668-v2
title: The Hidden Companies of the Global Economy: The Development of Global Commodity Traders 1945-2015, 2016

description: The project aims at examining the development of global commodity trading in the period 1980-2015 and its role in the changing position of China in the global economy. The study seeks to open up a part of global economic history that has not previously been explored by scholars. The ambition of the project is to understand the rise of China by investigating the flow of raw materials and the companies involved in fueling the Chinese economic growth.
DOI: 10.18712/nsd-nsd2668-v3
title: The Hidden Companies of the Global Economy: The Development of Global Commodity Traders 1945-2015, 2016

description: The project aims at examining the development of global commodity trading in the period 1980-2015 and its role in the changing position of China in the global economy. The study seeks to open up a part of global economic history that has not previously been explored by scholars. The ambition of the project is to understand the rise of China by investigating the flow of raw materials and the companies involved in fueling the Chinese economic growth.
DOI: 10.18712/nsd-nsd2669-2-v1
title: Spatial Planning, Vacation Homes and Climate Change, 2016

description: The project illuminates how spatial planning and related policy measures can support a "climate friendly" development of vacation homes by reducing their contribution to greenhouse gas emissions as well as increasing the resilience of vacation home areas against climate change. Construction and use of vacation homes is associated with building energy use, greenhouse gas emissions from travel and land use impacts, and thus highly relevant to both climate mitigation and adaptation. Responding to climate challenges relating to vacation homes entails changes in planning practice to promote climate-friendly developments and use pattern of vacation homes. Based on case studies from Norway and China, the project identifies how recent trends in vacation home use contribute to greenhouse gas emissions from mobility and housing consumption. The project also obtains an insight on how vacation home use patterns are affected by climate change. It analyzes planning responses to these challenges. The analysis of planning strategies address how climate change is interpreted by planners and to what extent it is considered in vacation home planning. The data includes: - Interview transcription: transcription of 18 interviews with persons who have access to vacation homes. - Survey: A survey collected among inhabitants in 45 postal zones of Oslo region. The questionnaire asks information about people's primary dwelling (size, ownership, standard, etc.) and up to three non-primary dwellings as well as use pattern of the latter. - 'Climate scenarios in Trysil, Oppdal and Kragerø: This document includes future climate scenarios in the three municipalities. The scenarios were developed based on a workshop organized by the project team with two local experts and one expert from meteorological institute.
DOI: 10.18712/nsd-nsd2669-v1
title: Spatial Planning, Vacation Homes and Climate Change, 2016

description: The project illuminates how spatial planning and related policy measures can support a "climate friendly" development of vacation homes by reducing their contribution to greenhouse gas emissions as well as increasing the resilience of vacation home areas against climate change. Construction and use of vacation homes is associated with building energy use, greenhouse gas emissions from travel and land use impacts, and thus highly relevant to both climate mitigation and adaptation. Responding to climate challenges relating to vacation homes entails changes in planning practice to promote climate-friendly developments and use pattern of vacation homes. Based on case studies from Norway and China, the project identifies how recent trends in vacation home use contribute to greenhouse gas emissions from mobility and housing consumption. The project also obtains an insight on how vacation home use patterns are affected by climate change. It analyzes planning responses to these challenges. The analysis of planning strategies address how climate change is interpreted by planners and to what extent it is considered in vacation home planning.

The data includes:
- Interview transcription: transcription of 18 interviews with persons who have access to vacation homes.  
- Survey: A survey collected among inhabitants in 45 postal zones of Oslo region. The questionnaire asks information about people's primary dwelling (size, ownership, standard, etc.) and up to three non-primary dwellings as well as use pattern of the latter.
- 'Climate scenarios in Trysil, Oppdal and Kragerø: This document includes future climate scenarios in the three municipalities. The scenarios were developed based on a workshop organized by the project team with two local experts and one expert from meteorological institute.
DOI: 10.18712/nsd-nsd2669-v2
title: Spatial Planning, Vacation Homes and Climate Change, 2016

description: The project illuminates how spatial planning and related policy measures can support a "climate friendly" development of vacation homes by reducing their contribution to greenhouse gas emissions as well as increasing the resilience of vacation home areas against climate change. Construction and use of vacation homes is associated with building energy use, greenhouse gas emissions from travel and land use impacts, and thus highly relevant to both climate mitigation and adaptation. Responding to climate challenges relating to vacation homes entails changes in planning practice to promote climate-friendly developments and use pattern of vacation homes. Based on case studies from Norway and China, the project identifies how recent trends in vacation home use contribute to greenhouse gas emissions from mobility and housing consumption. The project also obtains an insight on how vacation home use patterns are affected by climate change. It analyzes planning responses to these challenges. The analysis of planning strategies address how climate change is interpreted by planners and to what extent it is considered in vacation home planning.

The data includes:
- Interview transcription: transcription of 18 interviews with persons who have access to vacation homes.  
- Survey: A survey collected among inhabitants in 45 postal zones of Oslo region. The questionnaire asks information about people's primary dwelling (size, ownership, standard, etc.) and up to three non-primary dwellings as well as use pattern of the latter.
- 'Climate scenarios in Trysil, Oppdal and Kragerø: This document includes future climate scenarios in the three municipalities. The scenarios were developed based on a workshop organized by the project team with two local experts and one expert from meteorological institute.
DOI: 10.18712/nsd-nsd2670-1-v2
title: The Administration Survey (Ministry and Directorate) 2016

description: In 2016, an electronic questionnaire was sent out to case officers and managers with at least one year's service in the ministry and directorate and other central administration on features of working methods, personnel and decision processes. The study is a continuation of similar surveys in 1976, 1986, 1996 and 2006. Principal investigators are Professor Per Lægreid, University of Bergen and Rokkan Centre, Professors Tom Christensen and Morten Egeberg, University of Oslo, and Professor Jarle Trondal, University of Agder. All the researchers have been central as project staff and principal investigators in the previous central administration surveys. About the Central Administration Surveys 2016 The survey represents a follow-up of four previous surveys that cover the entire Norwegian central administration. The survey started with "Maktutredningens departementsstudie i 1976" with Professor Johan P. Olsen as principal investigator. Ten years later, a closely related survey was conducted under the auspices of the Research Council's focus area "management, organization and management system" (LOS). In 1996 and 2006, the third and fourth equivalent survey was carried out, then under the auspices of ARENA, the University of Oslo, in collaboration with the Department of Political Science, the University of Oslo and the University of Bergen. Since the last survey, a new decade has passed and one wanted to follow up many of the same topics again. The survey in 2016 was carried out and financed by the University of Oslo in collaboration with the University of Agder and the University of Bergen. The technical execution was handled by NSD - the Norwegian Center for Research Data, which also safeguards privacy concerns in the data collection. The result of the surveys is that one gets - in an international context - unique insight into development features with regard to the administration's working methods, staff composition and value alignment over a 40-year period. One goal is that the survey will contribute significantly to the administration's self-understanding, society's understanding of it, and thus to the work of maintaining and creating good governance. In addition to questions about time use, work routines and decision-making processes, the questionnaire also contains some questions that have been specifically prepared for the government-appointed law committee that will go through the Public Administration Act, led by Professor Inge Lorange Backer, appointed by Royal Decree 23.11 2015.
DOI: 10.18712/nsd-nsd2670-1-v3
title: The Administration Survey (Ministry and Directorate) 2016

description: In 2016, an electronic questionnaire was sent out to case officers and managers with at least one year's service in the ministry and directorate and other central administration on features of working methods, personnel and decision processes. The study is a continuation of similar surveys in 1976, 1986, 1996 and 2006. Principal investigators are Professor Per Lægreid, University of Bergen and Rokkan Centre, Professors Tom Christensen and Morten Egeberg, University of Oslo, and Professor Jarle Trondal, University of Agder. All the researchers have been central as project staff and principal investigators in the previous central administration surveys.

About the Central Administration Surveys 2016
The survey represents a follow-up of four previous surveys that cover the entire Norwegian central administration. The survey started with "Maktutredningens departementsstudie i 1976" with Professor Johan P. Olsen as principal investigator. Ten years later, a closely related survey was conducted under the auspices of the Research Council's focus area "management, organization and management system" (LOS). In 1996 and 2006, the third and fourth equivalent survey was carried out, then under the auspices of ARENA, the University of Oslo, in collaboration with the Department of Political Science, the University of Oslo and the University of Bergen. Since the last survey, a new decade has passed and one wanted to follow up many of the same topics again. The survey in 2016 was carried out and financed by the University of Oslo in collaboration with the University of Agder and the University of Bergen. The technical execution was handled by NSD - the Norwegian Center for Research Data, which also safeguards privacy concerns in the data collection. The result of the surveys is that one gets - in an international context - unique insight into development features with regard to the administration's working methods, staff composition and value alignment over a 40-year period. One goal is that the survey will contribute significantly to the administration's self-understanding, society's understanding of it, and thus to the work of maintaining and creating good governance.

In addition to questions about time use, work routines and decision-making processes, the questionnaire also contains some questions that have been specifically prepared for the government-appointed law committee that will go through the Public Administration Act, led by Professor Inge Lorange Backer, appointed by Royal Decree 23.11 2015.
DOI: 10.18712/nsd-nsd2670-2-v2
title: The Ministry Survey 2016

description: In 2016, an electronic questionnaire was sent out to case officers and managers with at least one year's service in the ministry and directorate and other central administration on features of working methods, personnel and decision processes. The study is a continuation of similar surveys in 1976, 1986, 1996 and 2006. Principal investigators are Professor Per Lægreid, University of Bergen and Rokkan Centre, professors Tom Christensen and Morten Egeberg, University of Oslo, and Professor Jarle Trondal, University of Agder. All the researchers have been central as project staff and principal investigators in the previous central administration surveys. About the Ministry Survey Case managers and managers in all ministries were sent a questionnaire that deals with features of working methods, personnel and decision processes. The survey was conducted as a web-based survey. The survey was sent out to all employees in the ministries - at adviser level and above - with at least one year's service.
DOI: 10.18712/nsd-nsd2670-2-v3
title: The Ministry Survey 2016

description: In 2016, an electronic questionnaire was sent out to case officers and managers with at least one year's service in the ministry and directorate and other central administration on features of working methods, personnel and decision processes. The study is a continuation of similar surveys in 1976, 1986, 1996 and 2006. Principal investigators are Professor Per Lægreid, University of Bergen and Rokkan Centre, professors Tom Christensen and Morten Egeberg, University of Oslo, and Professor Jarle Trondal, University of Agder. All the researchers have been central as project staff and principal investigators in the previous central administration surveys.

About the Ministry Survey
Case managers and managers in all ministries were sent a questionnaire that deals with features of working methods, personnel and decision processes. The survey was conducted as a web-based survey.
The survey was sent out to all employees in the ministries
- at adviser level and above
- with at least one year's service.
DOI: 10.18712/nsd-nsd2670-3-v2
title: The Directorate Survey 2016

description: In 2016, an electronic questionnaire was sent out to case officers and managers with at least one year's service in the ministry and directorate and other central administration on features of working methods, personnel and decision processes. The study is a continuation of similar surveys in 1976, 1986, 1996 and 2006. Principal investigators are Professor Per Lægreid, University of Bergen and Rokkan Centre, professors Tom Christensen and Morten Egeberg, University of Oslo, and Professor Jarle Trondal, University of Agder. All the researchers have been central as project staff and principal investigatorss in the previous central administration surveys. About the Directorate Survey Case managers and managers with at least one year's service time in directorates and other central administration outside the ministries were sent a questionnaire dealing with features of working methods, personnel and decision-making processes. The survey was conducted as a web-based survey. Important features of the respondents were that they: - is employed by a directorate or other body in the central administration outside the ministries - has at least one year of service - is at case officer or chief level The form was sent to every third employee who was part of the population. Based on submitted lists and available sources, an attempt was made to find as accurate a survey population as possible. However, if people did not meet the above requirements, they were asked to return the e-mail with a brief reference to why they should not attend so that they could be deleted from the population and any reminders.