cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.3886/e72764v1
title: Online Petition Data: 2010-2013 (Germany)

description: Social media are highly beneficial environments for not only positive but also negative word-of-mouth propagation. In reaction to any questionable statement or activity, social media users can create huge waves of outrage within just a few hours. Companies, politicians, and celebrities have increasingly been facing the impact of such aggressive online behavior. These so-called online firestorms pose new challenges for communications. This article introduces social norm theory to understand online aggression in a social-political online setting, challenging the popular assumption that online anonymity is one of the principle factors that promotes aggression. We underpin this social norm view by analyzing a major social media platform concerned with public affairs over a period of three years entailing 532,197 comments on 1,612 online petitions. Results show that in the context of online firestorms, non-anonymous individuals are more aggressive compared to anonymous individuals. This effect is reinforced if selective incentives are present and if aggressors are intrinsically motivated. 
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e72769v2
title: Online Petition Data: 2010-2013 (Germany)

description: Social media are highly beneficial environments for not only positive but also negative word-of-mouth propagation. In reaction to any questionable statement or activity, social media users can create huge waves of outrage within just a few hours. Companies, politicians, and celebrities have increasingly been facing the impact of such aggressive online behavior. These so-called online firestorms pose new challenges for communications. This article introduces social norm theory to understand online aggression in a social-political online setting, challenging the popular assumption that online anonymity is one of the principle factors that promotes aggression. We underpin this social norm view by analyzing a major social media platform concerned with public affairs over a period of three years entailing 532,197 comments on 1,612 online petitions. Results show that in the context of online firestorms, non-anonymous individuals are more aggressive compared to anonymous individuals. This effect is reinforced if selective incentives are present and if aggressors are intrinsically motivated. 
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e72311v3
title: Climate Related Tweets Before, During, and After Hurricane Sandy 10-15 through 11-15 2012

description: We used the University of Illinois’ CCR (http://www.carboncapturereport.org/ ) data collected from the Twitter search application program interface (API) which selected tweets mentioning “climate change” or “global warming.” To gather the data, we used the simple web scraping option in Microsoft Excel to pull the data into an Excel spreadsheet from the website pages on the Carbon Capture Report from the selected sample days of 10/15/2012 to 11/15/2012. Directions for automated data collection into Excel are found at the “Get external data from a Web page” site operated by Microsoft. Note that a systematic inflation of the data was found with cases tagged with “#global warming” but were about listening to music. These cases are marked by the terms “bandung” and “pitbull” and were removed from consideration in the initial publication but are included here to ensure the full and complete data.
DOI: 10.3886/e72769v1
title: Online Petition Data: 2010-2013 (Germany)

description: Social media are highly beneficial environments for not only positive but also negative word-of-mouth propagation. In reaction to any questionable statement or activity, social media users can create huge waves of outrage within just a few hours. Companies, politicians, and celebrities have increasingly been facing the impact of such aggressive online behavior. These so-called online firestorms pose new challenges for communications. This article introduces social norm theory to understand online aggression in a social-political online setting, challenging the popular assumption that online anonymity is one of the principle factors that promotes aggression. We underpin this social norm view by analyzing a major social media platform concerned with public affairs over a period of three years entailing 532,197 comments on 1,612 online petitions. Results show that in the context of online firestorms, non-anonymous individuals are more aggressive compared to anonymous individuals. This effect is reinforced if selective incentives are present and if aggressors are intrinsically motivated. 
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e72783v1
title: Online Petition Data: 2010-2013 (Germany)

description: Social media are highly beneficial environments for not only positive but also negative word-of-mouth propagation. In reaction to any questionable statement or activity, social media users can create huge waves of outrage within just a few hours. Companies, politicians, and celebrities have increasingly been facing the impact of such aggressive online behavior. These so-called online firestorms pose new challenges for communications. This article introduces social norm theory to understand online aggression in a social-political online setting, challenging the popular assumption that online anonymity is one of the principle factors that promotes aggression. We underpin this social norm view by analyzing a major social media platform concerned with public affairs over a period of three years entailing 532,197 comments on 1,612 online petitions. Results show that in the context of online firestorms, non-anonymous individuals are more aggressive compared to anonymous individuals. This effect is reinforced if selective incentives are present and if aggressors are intrinsically motivated. 
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e72783v2
title: Online Petition Data: 2010-2013 (Germany)

description: Social media are highly beneficial environments for not only positive but also negative word-of-mouth propagation. In reaction to any questionable statement or activity, social media users can create huge waves of outrage within just a few hours. Companies, politicians, and celebrities have increasingly been facing the impact of such aggressive online behavior. These so-called online firestorms pose new challenges for communications. This article introduces social norm theory to understand online aggression in a social-political online setting, challenging the popular assumption that online anonymity is one of the principle factors that promotes aggression. We underpin this social norm view by analyzing a major social media platform concerned with public affairs over a period of three years entailing 532,197 comments on 1,612 online petitions. Results show that in the context of online firestorms, non-anonymous individuals are more aggressive compared to anonymous individuals. This effect is reinforced if selective incentives are present and if aggressors are intrinsically motivated. 
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e72834v1
title: Online Petition Data: 2010-2013 (Germany)

description: Social media are highly beneficial environments for not only positive but also negative word-of-mouth propagation. In reaction to any questionable statement or activity, social media users can create huge waves of outrage within just a few hours. Companies, politicians, and celebrities have increasingly been facing the impact of such aggressive online behavior. These so-called online firestorms pose new challenges for communications. This article introduces social norm theory to understand online aggression in a social-political online setting, challenging the popular assumption that online anonymity is one of the principle factors that promotes aggression. We underpin this social norm view by analyzing a major social media platform concerned with public affairs over a period of three years entailing 532,197 comments on 1,612 online petitions. Results show that in the context of online firestorms, non-anonymous individuals are more aggressive compared to anonymous individuals. This effect is reinforced if selective incentives are present and if aggressors are intrinsically motivated. 
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e72834v2
title: Online Petition Data: 2010-2013 (Germany)

description: Social media are highly beneficial environments for not only positive but also negative word-of-mouth propagation. In reaction to any questionable statement or activity, social media users can create huge waves of outrage within just a few hours. Companies, politicians, and celebrities have increasingly been facing the impact of such aggressive online behavior. These so-called online firestorms pose new challenges for communications. This article introduces social norm theory to understand online aggression in a social-political online setting, challenging the popular assumption that online anonymity is one of the principle factors that promotes aggression. We underpin this social norm view by analyzing a major social media platform concerned with public affairs over a period of three years entailing 532,197 comments on 1,612 online petitions. Results show that in the context of online firestorms, non-anonymous individuals are more aggressive compared to anonymous individuals. This effect is reinforced if selective incentives are present and if aggressors are intrinsically motivated. 
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e72311v1
title: Climate Related Tweets Before, During, and After Hurricane Sandy 10-15 through 11-15 2012

description: We used the University of Illinois’ CCR (http://www.carboncapturereport.org/ ) data collected from the Twitter search application program interface (API) which selected tweets mentioning “climate change” or “global warming.” To gather the data, we used the simple web scraping option in Microsoft Excel to pull the data into an Excel spreadsheet from the website pages on the Carbon Capture Report from the selected sample days of 10/15/2012 to 11/15/2012. Directions for automated data collection into Excel are found at the “Get external data from a Web page” site operated by Microsoft. Note that a systematic inflation of the data was found with cases tagged with “#global warming” but were about listening to music. These cases are marked by the terms “bandung” and “pitbull” and were removed from consideration in the initial publication but are included here to ensure the full and complete data.
DOI: 10.3886/e72311v2
title: Climate Related Tweets Before, During, and After Hurricane Sandy 10-15 through 11-15 2012

description: We used the University of Illinois’ CCR (http://www.carboncapturereport.org/ ) data collected from the Twitter search application program interface (API) which selected tweets mentioning “climate change” or “global warming.” To gather the data, we used the simple web scraping option in Microsoft Excel to pull the data into an Excel spreadsheet from the website pages on the Carbon Capture Report from the selected sample days of 10/15/2012 to 11/15/2012. Directions for automated data collection into Excel are found at the “Get external data from a Web page” site operated by Microsoft. Note that a systematic inflation of the data was found with cases tagged with “#global warming” but were about listening to music. These cases are marked by the terms “bandung” and “pitbull” and were removed from consideration in the initial publication but are included here to ensure the full and complete data.
DOI: 10.3886/e72328v1
title: Climate Related Tweets Before, During, and After Hurricane Sandy 10-15 through 11-15 2012

description: We used the University of Illinois’ CCR (http://www.carboncapturereport.org/ ) data collected from the Twitter search application program interface (API) which selected tweets mentioning “climate change” or “global warming.” To gather the data, we used the simple web scraping option in Microsoft Excel to pull the data into an Excel spreadsheet from the website pages on the Carbon Capture Report from the selected sample days of 10/15/2012 to 11/15/2012. Directions for automated data collection into Excel are found at the “Get external data from a Web page” site operated by Microsoft. Note that a systematic inflation of the data was found with cases tagged with “#global warming” but were about listening to music. These cases are marked by the terms “bandung” and “pitbull” and were removed from consideration in the initial publication but are included here to ensure the full and complete data.
DOI: 10.3886/e72894v1
title: problem behavior of children with ASD: 2011[Taiwan]

description: No summary available for this study.
DOI: 10.3886/e72900v1
title: problem behavior of children with ASD: 2011[Taiwan]

description: No summary available for this study.
DOI: 10.3886/e72930v1
title: problem behavior of children with ASD: 2011[Taiwan]

description: No summary available for this study.
DOI: 10.3886/e73027v2
title: Lowering SR swed JPR

description: No summary available for this study.
DOI: 10.3886/e61131v9
title: Lifelong Learning Survey of Recent US College Graduates

description: The Project Information Literacy (PIL) lifelong learning survey dataset was produced as part of a two-year federally funded study on relatively recent US college graduates and their information-seeking behavior for continued learning. The goal of the survey was to collect quantitative data about the information-seeking behavior of a sample of recent graduates—the strategies, techniques, information support systems, and best practices—used to support lifelong learning in post-college life. The dataset contains responses from 1,651 respondents to a 21-item questionnaire administered between October 9, 2014 and December 15, 2014. The voluntary sample of respondents consisted of relatively recent graduates, who had completed their degrees between 2007 and 2012, from one of 10 US colleges and universities in the institutional sample. Quantitative data are included in the dataset about the learning needs of relatively recent graduates as well as the information sources they used in three arenas of their post-college lives (i.e., personal life, workplace, and the communities in which they resided). Demographic information—including age, gender, major, GPA, employment status, graduate school attendance, and geographic proximity of current residence to their alma mater—is also included in the dataset for the respondents. 
<br>
<br>"Staying Smart: How Today's Graduates Continue to Learn Once They Complete College," Alison J. Head, Project Information Literacy Research Report, Seattle: University of Washington Information School (January 5, 2016), 112 pages, 6.9 MB.
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e61146v2
title: The Tangail Survey: Household Level Census of Subjective Well-Being, Perceptions of Relative Economic Position, and International Migration: 2013 [Tangail, Bangladesh]

description: The Tangail Survey (TS) constitutes a household level census of three contiguous villages in the Tangail district of Dhaka, Bangladesh. In addition to standard socioeconomic and demographic information (e.g. marital status, employment, age, gender, living conditions, etc.), the TS gathers information on international migration, perceptions of respondent's economic position relative to different reference groups (e.g. neighbors, colleagues, siblings, etc.), subjective well-being, and household GPS location coordinates. Data on roughly 1,400 households were collected in a single wave during the summer of 2013.
<br>
<br>On 2016-08-20, the openICPSR web site was moved to new software. In the migration process, some projects were not published in the new system because the decisions made in the old site did not map easily to the new setup. An ICPSR staff member manually published these projects, taking care to preserve the original wishes of the depositor.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e73027v1
title: Lowering SR swed JPR

description: No summary available for this study.
DOI: 10.3886/e73029v1
title: Lowering SR swed JPR

description: No summary available for this study.
DOI: 10.3886/e73043v1
title: Lowering SR swed JPR

description: No summary available for this study.
DOI: 10.3886/e73556v1
title: The Effect of the Belief in Free Market Ideology on Redressing Corporate Injustice

description: Many people in the major Western economies (e.g., U.S., UK, Germany) subscribe to free market ideology (FMI), which claims that institutional oversight of the market is unnecessary for public reaction can force corporations to regulate their own behavior. The question then becomes how people’s belief in FMI affects their reactions to corporate transgressions. Given its ingroup-centered values, we hypothesized that FMI beliefs would bias reactions to corporate transgressions. We report results of a pilot study showing that FMI beliefs are predicted by selfishness, tradition, conformity, and lack of universalism. We then report three experiments, which showed that stronger FMI beliefs predict weaker demands to redress corporate injustices committed by ingroup (but not outgroup) corporations (Study 1-3), especially when victims of corporate wrongdoings belong to an outgroup (rather than the ingroup; Study 3). The findings inform our conceptual understanding of FMI and give insights about its implications for market justice.
DOI: 10.3886/e73567v1
title: The Effect of the Belief in Free Market Ideology on Redressing Corporate Injustice

description: Many people in the major Western economies (e.g., U.S., UK, Germany) subscribe to free market ideology (FMI), which claims that institutional oversight of the market is unnecessary for public reaction can force corporations to regulate their own behavior. The question then becomes how people’s belief in FMI affects their reactions to corporate transgressions. Given its ingroup-centered values, we hypothesized that FMI beliefs would bias reactions to corporate transgressions. We report results of a pilot study showing that FMI beliefs are predicted by selfishness, tradition, conformity, and lack of universalism. We then report three experiments, which showed that stronger FMI beliefs predict weaker demands to redress corporate injustices committed by ingroup (but not outgroup) corporations (Study 1-3), especially when victims of corporate wrongdoings belong to an outgroup (rather than the ingroup; Study 3). The findings inform our conceptual understanding of FMI and give insights about its implications for market justice.
DOI: 10.3886/e73576v1
title: The Effect of the Belief in Free Market Ideology on Redressing Corporate Injustice

description: Many people in the major Western economies (e.g., U.S., UK, Germany) subscribe to free market ideology (FMI), which claims that institutional oversight of the market is unnecessary for public reaction can force corporations to regulate their own behavior. The question then becomes how people’s belief in FMI affects their reactions to corporate transgressions. Given its ingroup-centered values, we hypothesized that FMI beliefs would bias reactions to corporate transgressions. We report results of a pilot study showing that FMI beliefs are predicted by selfishness, tradition, conformity, and lack of universalism. We then report three experiments, which showed that stronger FMI beliefs predict weaker demands to redress corporate injustices committed by ingroup (but not outgroup) corporations (Study 1-3), especially when victims of corporate wrongdoings belong to an outgroup (rather than the ingroup; Study 3). The findings inform our conceptual understanding of FMI and give insights about its implications for market justice.
DOI: 10.3886/e73599v1
title: The Effect of the Belief in Free Market Ideology on Redressing Corporate Injustice

description: Many people in the major Western economies (e.g., U.S., UK, Germany) subscribe to free market ideology (FMI), which claims that institutional oversight of the market is unnecessary for public reaction can force corporations to regulate their own behavior. The question then becomes how people’s belief in FMI affects their reactions to corporate transgressions. Given its ingroup-centered values, we hypothesized that FMI beliefs would bias reactions to corporate transgressions. We report results of a pilot study showing that FMI beliefs are predicted by selfishness, tradition, conformity, and lack of universalism. We then report three experiments, which showed that stronger FMI beliefs predict weaker demands to redress corporate injustices committed by ingroup (but not outgroup) corporations (Study 1-3), especially when victims of corporate wrongdoings belong to an outgroup (rather than the ingroup; Study 3). The findings inform our conceptual understanding of FMI and give insights about its implications for market justice.
DOI: 10.3886/e73608v1
title: The Effect of the Belief in Free Market Ideology on Redressing Corporate Injustice

description: Many people in the major Western economies (e.g., U.S., UK, Germany) subscribe to free market ideology (FMI), which claims that institutional oversight of the market is unnecessary for public reaction can force corporations to regulate their own behavior. The question then becomes how people’s belief in FMI affects their reactions to corporate transgressions. Given its ingroup-centered values, we hypothesized that FMI beliefs would bias reactions to corporate transgressions. We report results of a pilot study showing that FMI beliefs are predicted by selfishness, tradition, conformity, and lack of universalism. We then report three experiments, which showed that stronger FMI beliefs predict weaker demands to redress corporate injustices committed by ingroup (but not outgroup) corporations (Study 1-3), especially when victims of corporate wrongdoings belong to an outgroup (rather than the ingroup; Study 3). The findings inform our conceptual understanding of FMI and give insights about its implications for market justice.
DOI: 10.3886/e73631v1
title: The Effect of the Belief in Free Market Ideology on Redressing Corporate Injustice

description: Many people in the major Western economies (e.g., U.S., UK, Germany) subscribe to free market ideology (FMI), which claims that institutional oversight of the market is unnecessary for public reaction can force corporations to regulate their own behavior. The question then becomes how people’s belief in FMI affects their reactions to corporate transgressions. Given its ingroup-centered values, we hypothesized that FMI beliefs would bias reactions to corporate transgressions. We report results of a pilot study showing that FMI beliefs are predicted by selfishness, tradition, conformity, and lack of universalism. We then report three experiments, which showed that stronger FMI beliefs predict weaker demands to redress corporate injustices committed by ingroup (but not outgroup) corporations (Study 1-3), especially when victims of corporate wrongdoings belong to an outgroup (rather than the ingroup; Study 3). The findings inform our conceptual understanding of FMI and give insights about its implications for market justice.
DOI: 10.3886/e73640v1
title: The Effect of the Belief in Free Market Ideology on Redressing Corporate Injustice

description: Many people in the major Western economies (e.g., U.S., UK, Germany) subscribe to free market ideology (FMI), which claims that institutional oversight of the market is unnecessary for public reaction can force corporations to regulate their own behavior. The question then becomes how people’s belief in FMI affects their reactions to corporate transgressions. Given its ingroup-centered values, we hypothesized that FMI beliefs would bias reactions to corporate transgressions. We report results of a pilot study showing that FMI beliefs are predicted by selfishness, tradition, conformity, and lack of universalism. We then report three experiments, which showed that stronger FMI beliefs predict weaker demands to redress corporate injustices committed by ingroup (but not outgroup) corporations (Study 1-3), especially when victims of corporate wrongdoings belong to an outgroup (rather than the ingroup; Study 3). The findings inform our conceptual understanding of FMI and give insights about its implications for market justice.