cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5747118.v1
title: Economic evaluation of paliperidone palmitate once monthly for treating chronic schizophrenia patients in the United Arab Emirates

description: <b>Objective:</b> Schizophrenia is one of the most debilitating diseases in the United Arab Emirates. Oral antipsychotics (OA) are commonly used in terms of pharmacotherapy; however, these treatments can be rendered ineffective by poor patient adherence. Paliperidone palmitate once monthly (PP1M) is a long acting antipsychotic which can offer an adherence advantage when compared to oral treatments. The study objective is to estimate the cost effectiveness of PP1M in the UAE setting. <b>Research design and methods:</b> A 1-year validated decision-tree model was adapted to the UAE setting using published literature and expert opinion. Patients on PP1M were compared with or without oral supplementation to patients on any oral antipsychotic. Patient outcomes studied were incremental cost per quality adjusted life years gained, incremental cost per hospitalizations, relapses, and emergency room visits averted. <b>Results:</b> After 1 year, patients on PP1M monotherapy when compared to oral antipsychotics had better outcomes (0.840 vs 0.811 QALYs; 31 relapse days averted as well as 9 and 24 percentage points of ER and hospitalizations averted, respectively), and better healthcare savings (AED 1405). PP1M economically dominated oral antipsychotics. The results were stable across a broad range of deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. PP1M plus oral antipsychotics could not be evaluated due to the absence of clinical data that would provide insight into the clinical value of combination therapy. <b>Conclusion:</b> PP1M is estimated to save the UAE healthcare system money, while at the same time improving patient outcomes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5747103
title: CSV of all projectile point attributes considered in this study from Current and potential roles of archaeology in the development of cultural evolutionary theory

description: Archaeology has much to contribute to the study of cultural evolution. Empirical data at archaeological timescales are uniquely well suited to tracking rates of cultural change, detecting phylogenetic signals among groups of artefacts, and recognizing long-run effects of distinct cultural transmission mechanisms. Nonetheless, these are still relatively infrequent subjects of archaeological analysis and archaeology's potential to help advance our understanding of cultural evolution has thus far been largely unrealized. Cultural evolutionary models developed in other fields have been used to interpret patterns identified in archaeological records, which in turn provides independent tests of the models, as demonstrated here through a study of late Prehistoric stone projectile points from the U.S. Southwest. These tests may not be straightforward, though, because archaeological data are complex, often representing events aggregated over many years (or centuries or millennia) while processes thought to drive cultural evolution (e.g. biased learning) operate on much shorter timescales. To fulfil archaeology's potential, we should continue to develop models specifically tailored to archaeological circumstances, and explore ways to incorporate the rich contextual data produced by archaeological research.This article is part of the theme issue ‘Bridging cultural gaps: interdisciplinary studies in human cultural evolution’.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5747103.v1
title: CSV of all projectile point attributes considered in this study from Current and potential roles of archaeology in the development of cultural evolutionary theory

description: Archaeology has much to contribute to the study of cultural evolution. Empirical data at archaeological timescales are uniquely well suited to tracking rates of cultural change, detecting phylogenetic signals among groups of artefacts, and recognizing long-run effects of distinct cultural transmission mechanisms. Nonetheless, these are still relatively infrequent subjects of archaeological analysis and archaeology's potential to help advance our understanding of cultural evolution has thus far been largely unrealized. Cultural evolutionary models developed in other fields have been used to interpret patterns identified in archaeological records, which in turn provides independent tests of the models, as demonstrated here through a study of late Prehistoric stone projectile points from the U.S. Southwest. These tests may not be straightforward, though, because archaeological data are complex, often representing events aggregated over many years (or centuries or millennia) while processes thought to drive cultural evolution (e.g. biased learning) operate on much shorter timescales. To fulfil archaeology's potential, we should continue to develop models specifically tailored to archaeological circumstances, and explore ways to incorporate the rich contextual data produced by archaeological research.This article is part of the theme issue ‘Bridging cultural gaps: interdisciplinary studies in human cultural evolution’.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5747100
title: R Studio file containing code for the simulation and Figure 3 from Current and potential roles of archaeology in the development of cultural evolutionary theory

description: Archaeology has much to contribute to the study of cultural evolution. Empirical data at archaeological timescales are uniquely well suited to tracking rates of cultural change, detecting phylogenetic signals among groups of artefacts, and recognizing long-run effects of distinct cultural transmission mechanisms. Nonetheless, these are still relatively infrequent subjects of archaeological analysis and archaeology's potential to help advance our understanding of cultural evolution has thus far been largely unrealized. Cultural evolutionary models developed in other fields have been used to interpret patterns identified in archaeological records, which in turn provides independent tests of the models, as demonstrated here through a study of late Prehistoric stone projectile points from the U.S. Southwest. These tests may not be straightforward, though, because archaeological data are complex, often representing events aggregated over many years (or centuries or millennia) while processes thought to drive cultural evolution (e.g. biased learning) operate on much shorter timescales. To fulfil archaeology's potential, we should continue to develop models specifically tailored to archaeological circumstances, and explore ways to incorporate the rich contextual data produced by archaeological research.This article is part of the theme issue ‘Bridging cultural gaps: interdisciplinary studies in human cultural evolution’.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746905
title: RHP and Assessment Model Code.txt from Mutual assessment during ritualized fighting in mantis shrimp (Stomatopoda)

description: Safe and effective conflict resolution is critical for survival and reproduction. Theoretical models describe how animals resolve conflict by assessing their own and/or their opponent's ability (resource holding potential, RHP), yet experimental tests of these models are often inconclusive. Recent reviews have suggested this uncertainty could be alleviated by using multiple approaches to test assessment models. The mantis shrimp <i>Neogonodactylus bredini</i> presents visual displays and ritualistically exchanges high-force strikes during territorial contests. We tested how <i>N. bredini</i> contest dynamics were explained by any of three assessment models—pure self-assessment, cumulative assessment and mutual assessment—using correlations and a novel, network analysis-based sequential behavioural analysis. We staged dyadic contests over burrow access between competitors matched either randomly or based on body size. In both randomly and size-matched contests, the best metric of RHP was body mass. Burrow residency interacted with mass to predict outcome. Correlations between contest costs and RHP rejected self-assessment, but could not fully differentiate between cumulative and mutual assessment. The sequential behavioural analysis ruled out cumulative assessment and supported mutual assessment. Our results demonstrate how multiple analyses provide strong inference to tests of assessment models and illuminate how individual behaviours constitute an assessment strategy.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746905.v1
title: RHP and Assessment Model Code.txt from Mutual assessment during ritualized fighting in mantis shrimp (Stomatopoda)

description: Safe and effective conflict resolution is critical for survival and reproduction. Theoretical models describe how animals resolve conflict by assessing their own and/or their opponent's ability (resource holding potential, RHP), yet experimental tests of these models are often inconclusive. Recent reviews have suggested this uncertainty could be alleviated by using multiple approaches to test assessment models. The mantis shrimp <i>Neogonodactylus bredini</i> presents visual displays and ritualistically exchanges high-force strikes during territorial contests. We tested how <i>N. bredini</i> contest dynamics were explained by any of three assessment models—pure self-assessment, cumulative assessment and mutual assessment—using correlations and a novel, network analysis-based sequential behavioural analysis. We staged dyadic contests over burrow access between competitors matched either randomly or based on body size. In both randomly and size-matched contests, the best metric of RHP was body mass. Burrow residency interacted with mass to predict outcome. Correlations between contest costs and RHP rejected self-assessment, but could not fully differentiate between cumulative and mutual assessment. The sequential behavioural analysis ruled out cumulative assessment and supported mutual assessment. Our results demonstrate how multiple analyses provide strong inference to tests of assessment models and illuminate how individual behaviours constitute an assessment strategy.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746899
title: Sequential Behavioural Analysis Code from Mutual assessment during ritualized fighting in mantis shrimp (Stomatopoda)

description: R code used in sequential behavioural analysis. Used in generating Figure 3; can be modified for use with other behavioural sequences data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746899.v1
title: Sequential Behavioural Analysis Code from Mutual assessment during ritualized fighting in mantis shrimp (Stomatopoda)

description: R code used in sequential behavioural analysis. Used in generating Figure 3; can be modified for use with other behavioural sequences data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746896
title: Body length-matched behavioural transitions dataset from Mutual assessment during ritualized fighting in mantis shrimp (Stomatopoda)

description: Data on individual behaviours and their transitions from body length-matched contests, used in sequential behavioural analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746896.v1
title: Body length-matched behavioural transitions dataset from Mutual assessment during ritualized fighting in mantis shrimp (Stomatopoda)

description: Data on individual behaviours and their transitions from body length-matched contests, used in sequential behavioural analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746890
title: Randomly-matched behavioural transitions dataset from Mutual assessment during ritualized fighting in mantis shrimp (Stomatopoda)

description: Data on individual behaviours and their transitions from randomly-matched contests, used in sequential behavioural analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746890.v1
title: Randomly-matched behavioural transitions dataset from Mutual assessment during ritualized fighting in mantis shrimp (Stomatopoda)

description: Data on individual behaviours and their transitions from randomly-matched contests, used in sequential behavioural analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746887
title: RHP-costs dataset from Mutual assessment during ritualized fighting in mantis shrimp (Stomatopoda)

description: Data used in analyses of RHP, residency effects, and correlations of costs and RHP.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746887.v1
title: RHP-costs dataset from Mutual assessment during ritualized fighting in mantis shrimp (Stomatopoda)

description: Data used in analyses of RHP, residency effects, and correlations of costs and RHP.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746884
title: ArbourZanno_ESM7_pairwise_comparisons_results.xlsx from The evolution of tail weaponization in amniotes

description: Weaponry, for the purpose of intraspecific combat or predator defence, is one of the most widespread animal adaptations, yet the selective pressures and constraints governing its phenotypic diversity and skeletal regionalization are not well understood. Here, we investigate the evolution of tail weaponry in amniotes, a rare form of weaponry that nonetheless evolved independently among a broad spectrum of life including mammals, turtles and dinosaurs. Using comparative methods, we test for links between morphology, ecology and behaviour in extant amniotes known to use the tail as a weapon, and in extinct taxa bearing osseous tail armaments. We find robust ecological and morphological correlates of both tail lashing behaviour and bony tail weaponry, including large body size, body armour and herbivory, suggesting these life-history parameters factor into the evolution of antipredator behaviours and tail armaments. We suggest that the evolution of tail weaponry is rare because large, armoured herbivores are uncommon in extant terrestrial faunas, as they have been throughout evolutionary history.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746884.v1
title: ArbourZanno_ESM7_pairwise_comparisons_results.xlsx from The evolution of tail weaponization in amniotes

description: Weaponry, for the purpose of intraspecific combat or predator defence, is one of the most widespread animal adaptations, yet the selective pressures and constraints governing its phenotypic diversity and skeletal regionalization are not well understood. Here, we investigate the evolution of tail weaponry in amniotes, a rare form of weaponry that nonetheless evolved independently among a broad spectrum of life including mammals, turtles and dinosaurs. Using comparative methods, we test for links between morphology, ecology and behaviour in extant amniotes known to use the tail as a weapon, and in extinct taxa bearing osseous tail armaments. We find robust ecological and morphological correlates of both tail lashing behaviour and bony tail weaponry, including large body size, body armour and herbivory, suggesting these life-history parameters factor into the evolution of antipredator behaviours and tail armaments. We suggest that the evolution of tail weaponry is rare because large, armoured herbivores are uncommon in extant terrestrial faunas, as they have been throughout evolutionary history.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746881
title: ArbourZanno_ESM4_tree2 from The evolution of tail weaponization in amniotes

description: Time-scaled phylogenetic trees, turtles as archosauromorphs (100 trees).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746881.v1
title: ArbourZanno_ESM4_tree2 from The evolution of tail weaponization in amniotes

description: Time-scaled phylogenetic trees, turtles as archosauromorphs (100 trees).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746878
title: ArbourZanno_ESM2_character_taxon_matrix from The evolution of tail weaponization in amniotes

description: Character-taxon matrix
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746878.v1
title: ArbourZanno_ESM2_character_taxon_matrix from The evolution of tail weaponization in amniotes

description: Character-taxon matrix
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746872
title: ArbourZanno_ESM9_correlations_summarized.xlsx from The evolution of tail weaponization in amniotes

description: Weaponry, for the purpose of intraspecific combat or predator defence, is one of the most widespread animal adaptations, yet the selective pressures and constraints governing its phenotypic diversity and skeletal regionalization are not well understood. Here, we investigate the evolution of tail weaponry in amniotes, a rare form of weaponry that nonetheless evolved independently among a broad spectrum of life including mammals, turtles and dinosaurs. Using comparative methods, we test for links between morphology, ecology and behaviour in extant amniotes known to use the tail as a weapon, and in extinct taxa bearing osseous tail armaments. We find robust ecological and morphological correlates of both tail lashing behaviour and bony tail weaponry, including large body size, body armour and herbivory, suggesting these life-history parameters factor into the evolution of antipredator behaviours and tail armaments. We suggest that the evolution of tail weaponry is rare because large, armoured herbivores are uncommon in extant terrestrial faunas, as they have been throughout evolutionary history.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746872.v1
title: ArbourZanno_ESM9_correlations_summarized.xlsx from The evolution of tail weaponization in amniotes

description: Weaponry, for the purpose of intraspecific combat or predator defence, is one of the most widespread animal adaptations, yet the selective pressures and constraints governing its phenotypic diversity and skeletal regionalization are not well understood. Here, we investigate the evolution of tail weaponry in amniotes, a rare form of weaponry that nonetheless evolved independently among a broad spectrum of life including mammals, turtles and dinosaurs. Using comparative methods, we test for links between morphology, ecology and behaviour in extant amniotes known to use the tail as a weapon, and in extinct taxa bearing osseous tail armaments. We find robust ecological and morphological correlates of both tail lashing behaviour and bony tail weaponry, including large body size, body armour and herbivory, suggesting these life-history parameters factor into the evolution of antipredator behaviours and tail armaments. We suggest that the evolution of tail weaponry is rare because large, armoured herbivores are uncommon in extant terrestrial faunas, as they have been throughout evolutionary history.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746869
title: ArbourZanno_ESM6_agedata.xlsx from The evolution of tail weaponization in amniotes

description: Weaponry, for the purpose of intraspecific combat or predator defence, is one of the most widespread animal adaptations, yet the selective pressures and constraints governing its phenotypic diversity and skeletal regionalization are not well understood. Here, we investigate the evolution of tail weaponry in amniotes, a rare form of weaponry that nonetheless evolved independently among a broad spectrum of life including mammals, turtles and dinosaurs. Using comparative methods, we test for links between morphology, ecology and behaviour in extant amniotes known to use the tail as a weapon, and in extinct taxa bearing osseous tail armaments. We find robust ecological and morphological correlates of both tail lashing behaviour and bony tail weaponry, including large body size, body armour and herbivory, suggesting these life-history parameters factor into the evolution of antipredator behaviours and tail armaments. We suggest that the evolution of tail weaponry is rare because large, armoured herbivores are uncommon in extant terrestrial faunas, as they have been throughout evolutionary history.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746869.v1
title: ArbourZanno_ESM6_agedata.xlsx from The evolution of tail weaponization in amniotes

description: Weaponry, for the purpose of intraspecific combat or predator defence, is one of the most widespread animal adaptations, yet the selective pressures and constraints governing its phenotypic diversity and skeletal regionalization are not well understood. Here, we investigate the evolution of tail weaponry in amniotes, a rare form of weaponry that nonetheless evolved independently among a broad spectrum of life including mammals, turtles and dinosaurs. Using comparative methods, we test for links between morphology, ecology and behaviour in extant amniotes known to use the tail as a weapon, and in extinct taxa bearing osseous tail armaments. We find robust ecological and morphological correlates of both tail lashing behaviour and bony tail weaponry, including large body size, body armour and herbivory, suggesting these life-history parameters factor into the evolution of antipredator behaviours and tail armaments. We suggest that the evolution of tail weaponry is rare because large, armoured herbivores are uncommon in extant terrestrial faunas, as they have been throughout evolutionary history.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746866
title: ArbourZanno_ESM3_tree1 from The evolution of tail weaponization in amniotes

description: Time-scaled phylogenetic trees, turtles as sauropterygian lepidosauromorphs (100 trees).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746866.v1
title: ArbourZanno_ESM3_tree1 from The evolution of tail weaponization in amniotes

description: Time-scaled phylogenetic trees, turtles as sauropterygian lepidosauromorphs (100 trees).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746863
title: ArbourZanno_ESM10_contingency_results.xlsx from The evolution of tail weaponization in amniotes

description: Weaponry, for the purpose of intraspecific combat or predator defence, is one of the most widespread animal adaptations, yet the selective pressures and constraints governing its phenotypic diversity and skeletal regionalization are not well understood. Here, we investigate the evolution of tail weaponry in amniotes, a rare form of weaponry that nonetheless evolved independently among a broad spectrum of life including mammals, turtles and dinosaurs. Using comparative methods, we test for links between morphology, ecology and behaviour in extant amniotes known to use the tail as a weapon, and in extinct taxa bearing osseous tail armaments. We find robust ecological and morphological correlates of both tail lashing behaviour and bony tail weaponry, including large body size, body armour and herbivory, suggesting these life-history parameters factor into the evolution of antipredator behaviours and tail armaments. We suggest that the evolution of tail weaponry is rare because large, armoured herbivores are uncommon in extant terrestrial faunas, as they have been throughout evolutionary history.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746863.v1
title: ArbourZanno_ESM10_contingency_results.xlsx from The evolution of tail weaponization in amniotes

description: Weaponry, for the purpose of intraspecific combat or predator defence, is one of the most widespread animal adaptations, yet the selective pressures and constraints governing its phenotypic diversity and skeletal regionalization are not well understood. Here, we investigate the evolution of tail weaponry in amniotes, a rare form of weaponry that nonetheless evolved independently among a broad spectrum of life including mammals, turtles and dinosaurs. Using comparative methods, we test for links between morphology, ecology and behaviour in extant amniotes known to use the tail as a weapon, and in extinct taxa bearing osseous tail armaments. We find robust ecological and morphological correlates of both tail lashing behaviour and bony tail weaponry, including large body size, body armour and herbivory, suggesting these life-history parameters factor into the evolution of antipredator behaviours and tail armaments. We suggest that the evolution of tail weaponry is rare because large, armoured herbivores are uncommon in extant terrestrial faunas, as they have been throughout evolutionary history.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746860
title: ArbourZanno_ESM5_tree3 from The evolution of tail weaponization in amniotes

description: Time-scaled phylogenetic trees, turtles as sauropterygian archosauromorphs (100 trees).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5746860.v1
title: ArbourZanno_ESM5_tree3 from The evolution of tail weaponization in amniotes

description: Time-scaled phylogenetic trees, turtles as sauropterygian archosauromorphs (100 trees).