cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226192
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2010

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226192.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2010

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226195.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2015

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226198.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2012

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226201
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2019

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226201.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2019

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226204
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2001

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226207
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2018

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226156.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2006

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226204.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2001

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226207.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2018

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226210
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2002

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226210.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2002

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226216
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2005

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226213
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2004

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226213.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2004

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226219.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2003

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226222.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2008

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226198
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2012

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226216.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2005

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226219
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2003

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226222
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2008

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226225
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2006

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226225.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2006

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226228
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2017

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226228.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2017

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226231
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2007

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226231.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2007

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226234
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2009

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226234.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2009

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226237.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2013

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226240
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2010

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226240.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2010

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226243
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2011

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226243.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2011

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226246
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2012

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226246.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2012

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226249
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2016

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226249.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2016

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226252.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2014

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226252
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2014

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226255
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2015

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226255.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2015

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226264
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2018

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226258
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2002

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226261
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2017

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226261.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2017

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226264.v1
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2018

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226237
title: Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2013

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226267
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2004

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226270
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2006

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226273
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2008

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226273.v1
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2008

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226276
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2010

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226279
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2007

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226282
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2005

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226285
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2009

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226288
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2003

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226291
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2014

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226294
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2011

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226297
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2016

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226300
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2002

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226300.v1
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2002

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226303
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2015

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226306
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2012

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226309
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2013

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226312
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2004

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226312.v1
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2004

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226318
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Monsoon 2017

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226315
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2006

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226315.v1
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2006

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226321
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2008

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226321.v1
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2008

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226324.v1
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2010

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226324
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2010

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226327
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2005

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226327.v1
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2005

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226330
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2011

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226330.v1
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2011

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226333
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2007

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226333.v1
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2007

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226336
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2003

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226336.v1
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2003

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226339
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2014

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226339.v1
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2014

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226342
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2012

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226342.v1
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2012

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226345
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2009

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226345.v1
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2009

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226348
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2015

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226348.v1
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2015

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226351
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2016

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226351.v1
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2016

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226354
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2013

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226354.v1
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2013

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226357
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2017

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20227095
title: File description

description: File description
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20226357.v1
title: Normalized Remote Sensing Agricultural GPP Winter 2017

description: agricultural gross primary productivity
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20227095.v1
title: File description

description: File description
DOI: 10.34740/kaggle/dsv/4556804
title: Global Genomic Neurofibromatosis Neoplasia
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21591117
title: Additional file 2 of Extracellular matrix profiles determine risk and prognosis of the squamous cell carcinoma subtype of non-small cell lung carcinoma

description: Additional file 2: Table S1. Differentially Expressed Hallmark Pathways in ECM-High vs ECM-Low Tumors. Table S2. Differentially Expressed MSigDb C2 Pathways in ECM-High vs ECM-Low Tumors. Table S3. Ligand-Receptor Interactions in ECM-High vs ECM-Low Tumors.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21591117.v1
title: Additional file 2 of Extracellular matrix profiles determine risk and prognosis of the squamous cell carcinoma subtype of non-small cell lung carcinoma

description: Additional file 2: Table S1. Differentially Expressed Hallmark Pathways in ECM-High vs ECM-Low Tumors. Table S2. Differentially Expressed MSigDb C2 Pathways in ECM-High vs ECM-Low Tumors. Table S3. Ligand-Receptor Interactions in ECM-High vs ECM-Low Tumors.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21591135
title: Additional file 1 of Multi-omics to predict changes during cold pressor test

description: Additional file 1. Annotation of identified metabolites.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21591135.v1
title: Additional file 1 of Multi-omics to predict changes during cold pressor test

description: Additional file 1. Annotation of identified metabolites.
DOI: 10.15129/1300f5c6-c57f-4f19-bffb-f716ca694aa9
title: Digital design of filtration and washing of active pharmaceutical ingredients via mechanistic modelling

description: gPROMS simulations of the different models and systems, binary solvent solubility predictions, and model calculations
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.16920194
title: Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of a screening test for cognitive and behavioural changes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

description: To describe challenges of translating and culturally adapting the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Screen into Norwegian (ECAS-N), evaluate its content validity; provide age- and education-balanced norms for verbal fluency and cut-off values for abnormal performance. Translation to Norwegian and back-translation to English complied with standard methods. Patients and ALS experts evaluated the relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility of the translated ECAS (ECAS-N). Content validity indexes at the item level (I-CVI), scale level (S-CVI) and inter-rater agreement were calculated. Performance of controls determined norms for written and spoken verbal fluency (<i>n</i> = 559) and cut-off scores for abnormal performance (<i>n</i> = 85). High levels of content validity was achieved for all items of the ECAS-N, I-CVI, S-CVI and inter-rater agreement was 87.5%. Age- and education-balanced norms for written and spoken verbal fluency were produced. Cut-off scores of abnormal performance were slightly lower than the original ECAS. The ECAS-N holds promise for detecting cognitive and behavioural impairment in Norwegian patients with ALS. Cut-off scores are situational and could slightly vary between different cultures. The ECAS-N can be used in international research, but researchers should be aware of the differences between the tests applied in the studies.Implications for rehabilitationThe ECAS-N, a Norwegian version of the English-language ECAS was produced for clinical use in Norway.Rigorous translation methods were used, and expert-judged modifications were made for Norwegian-specific culture and language nuances.Determination of ECAS-N cut-off scores for abnormal cognition was guided by a biostatistician, are slightly lower than the original ECAS, and are based on results from an objectively calculated number of healthy Norwegians.A nuanced picture of cognitive impairment in ALS drawn from a well-developed scale as the ECAS-N can contribute to a management process better tailored to patients’- and carers’ individual needs. The ECAS-N, a Norwegian version of the English-language ECAS was produced for clinical use in Norway. Rigorous translation methods were used, and expert-judged modifications were made for Norwegian-specific culture and language nuances. Determination of ECAS-N cut-off scores for abnormal cognition was guided by a biostatistician, are slightly lower than the original ECAS, and are based on results from an objectively calculated number of healthy Norwegians. A nuanced picture of cognitive impairment in ALS drawn from a well-developed scale as the ECAS-N can contribute to a management process better tailored to patients’- and carers’ individual needs.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.16943116
title: Staff and volunteers' perceptions of a Communication Enhanced Environment model in an acute/slow stream rehabilitation and a rehabilitation hospital ward: a qualitative description study within a before-and-after pilot study

description: A lack of social interaction during early stroke recovery can negatively affect neurological recovery and health-related quality of life of patients with aphasia following stroke. A Communication Enhanced Environment (CEE) model was developed to increase patient engagement in language activities early after stroke. This study aimed to examine staff (<i>n</i> = 20) and volunteer (<i>n</i> = 2) perceptions of a CEE model and factors influencing the implementation and use of the model. This study formed part of a broader study that developed and embedded a CEE model on two hospital wards. Six focus groups and one interview with hospital staff were conducted and analysed using a qualitative description approach. Feedback emailed by volunteers was included in the data set. Staff and volunteers perceived the CEE model benefitted themselves, the hospital system and patients. Staff identified a range of factors that influenced the implementation and use of the CEE model including individual staff, volunteer and patient factors, hospital features, the ease with which the CEE model could be used, and the implementation approach. This study provides valuable insights into staff perceptions which may inform the implementation of interventions and future iterations of a CEE model.Implications for RehabilitationA CEE model may promote efficiency and increased patient engagement in stroke rehabilitation.The CEE model information session and aphasia communication partner training, and the provision of resources, may be useful strategies to increase staff confidence in using communication supporting strategies with patients with aphasia.Behaviour change and implementation science strategies may provide a framework to address barriers and promote facilitators to embed hospital-based interventions that require individual, ward, cultural and systems level change to reduce the evidence-based gap in clinical practice. A CEE model may promote efficiency and increased patient engagement in stroke rehabilitation. The CEE model information session and aphasia communication partner training, and the provision of resources, may be useful strategies to increase staff confidence in using communication supporting strategies with patients with aphasia. Behaviour change and implementation science strategies may provide a framework to address barriers and promote facilitators to embed hospital-based interventions that require individual, ward, cultural and systems level change to reduce the evidence-based gap in clinical practice.