cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557505.v1
title: Appendix G. Further histogram comparisons for tree, grass, and bare-ground cover.

description: Further histogram comparisons for tree, grass, and bare-ground cover.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557502
title: Appendix A. Table of locations, climate data, and soils descriptions for experimental study sites.

description: Table of locations, climate data, and soils descriptions for experimental study sites.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557499
title: Appendix B. Figure of soil temperature and matric potential in the four climate treatments at each site.

description: Figure of soil temperature and matric potential in the four climate treatments at each site.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557499.v1
title: Appendix B. Figure of soil temperature and matric potential in the four climate treatments at each site.

description: Figure of soil temperature and matric potential in the four climate treatments at each site.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557496
title: Appendix C. Table of selected species for the experiment.

description: Table of selected species for the experiment.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557496.v1
title: Appendix C. Table of selected species for the experiment.

description: Table of selected species for the experiment.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557493
title: Appendix D. Supplemental methods on species selection.

description: Supplemental methods on species selection.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557493.v1
title: Appendix D. Supplemental methods on species selection.

description: Supplemental methods on species selection.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557490
title: Appendix E. Table of ANOVA results.

description: Table of ANOVA results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557490.v1
title: Appendix E. Table of ANOVA results.

description: Table of ANOVA results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557487
title: Appendix F. Figure of recruitment of individual species in the four climate treatments at each site.

description: Figure of recruitment of individual species in the four climate treatments at each site.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557487.v1
title: Appendix F. Figure of recruitment of individual species in the four climate treatments at each site.

description: Figure of recruitment of individual species in the four climate treatments at each site.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557484
title: Appendix G. Figure of survivorship of each range group at each site.

description: Figure of survivorship of each range group at each site.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557484.v1
title: Appendix G. Figure of survivorship of each range group at each site.

description: Figure of survivorship of each range group at each site.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557481
title: Appendix H. Figure of mean plant size in climate treatments and each study site across all range groups.

description: Figure of mean plant size in climate treatments and each study site across all range groups.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557481.v1
title: Appendix H. Figure of mean plant size in climate treatments and each study site across all range groups.

description: Figure of mean plant size in climate treatments and each study site across all range groups.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557478
title: Appendix A. Table of origin and description of tetraploid Centaurea stoebe populations.

description: Table of origin and description of tetraploid Centaurea stoebe populations.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557478.v1
title: Appendix A. Table of origin and description of tetraploid Centaurea stoebe populations.

description: Table of origin and description of tetraploid Centaurea stoebe populations.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557475
title: Appendix B. Details on the methods and statistics.

description: Details on the methods and statistics.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557475.v1
title: Appendix B. Details on the methods and statistics.

description: Details on the methods and statistics.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557472
title: Appendix C. Figure depicting relative growth rate.

description: Figure depicting relative growth rate.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557472.v1
title: Appendix C. Figure depicting relative growth rate.

description: Figure depicting relative growth rate.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557469
title: Appendix D. Figures depicting relative efficiency indices.

description: Figures depicting relative efficiency indices.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557469.v1
title: Appendix D. Figures depicting relative efficiency indices.

description: Figures depicting relative efficiency indices.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557466
title: Appendix E. Figure depicting biomass of each EU and NA neighbor in the absence of competition.

description: Figure depicting biomass of each EU and NA neighbor in the absence of competition.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557466.v1
title: Appendix E. Figure depicting biomass of each EU and NA neighbor in the absence of competition.

description: Figure depicting biomass of each EU and NA neighbor in the absence of competition.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557463
title: Appendix F. Figure showing the relationship between soil moisture and biomass of EU or NA neighbors in the absence or presence of competition.

description: Figure showing the relationship between soil moisture and biomass of EU or NA neighbors in the absence or presence of competition.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557463.v1
title: Appendix F. Figure showing the relationship between soil moisture and biomass of EU or NA neighbors in the absence or presence of competition.

description: Figure showing the relationship between soil moisture and biomass of EU or NA neighbors in the absence or presence of competition.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557460
title: Appendix A. Founder treatment genetic diversity and comparison to natural dispersing clump sizes.

description: Founder treatment genetic diversity and comparison to natural dispersing clump sizes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557460.v1
title: Appendix A. Founder treatment genetic diversity and comparison to natural dispersing clump sizes.

description: Founder treatment genetic diversity and comparison to natural dispersing clump sizes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557457
title: Appendix B. Analysis details of treatment effects on population establishment, survival, and time to extinction.

description: Analysis details of treatment effects on population establishment, survival, and time to extinction.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557457.v1
title: Appendix B. Analysis details of treatment effects on population establishment, survival, and time to extinction.

description: Analysis details of treatment effects on population establishment, survival, and time to extinction.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557454
title: Appendix C. Relationship of annual survival and recruitment to population size and genetic treatment.

description: Relationship of annual survival and recruitment to population size and genetic treatment.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557454.v1
title: Appendix C. Relationship of annual survival and recruitment to population size and genetic treatment.

description: Relationship of annual survival and recruitment to population size and genetic treatment.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557451
title: Data Paper. Data Paper

description: File List SCBI_woodyplants_2008_2012.zip (MD5: f8b1fb17d207b2efa92323f1fcca610a) SCBI_initial_woody_stem_census_2012.csv (MD5: 4f8e190c6663cc549e96c09fcad48ee5) Woody_seedlings_2010_2012.csv (MD5: 9d2a91a1b7bcc8083a5c4b43349e026b) Seed_rain_2009_2011.csv (MD5: 154507144f26be8e09818f75cbc013ad) SCBI_oak_hickory_seeds_1986_2011.csv (MD5: 895ec44924285753eb3fcd7bf144bc3d) raw_SIGEO_2010_ALL_tringwidths.csv (MD5: df0af04bc387b94c06b930a6dd08c0a4) Description We present data from the first five years (2008–2012) of the establishment of the 25.6-ha Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute (SCBI) Large Forest Dynamics Plot, comprising the initial woody stem census, woody seedling plot surveys, seed rain, and dendrochronological data. The plot is in mature secondary mixed deciduous forest 5 km south of Front Royal, Virginia, USA. The initial plot census enumerated 38,932 free-standing living stems and 29,991 living individuals &gt;1 cm DBH comprising 62 species, 38 genera, and 26 families, along with an additional 1248 dead/missing standing stems, for a total of 40,180 stems. Dominant canopy trees include tulip poplar (<i>Liriodendron tulipifera</i>), hickories (<i>Carya</i> spp.), oaks (<i>Quercus</i> spp.), white ash (<i>Fraxinus americana</i>), and black gum (<i>Nyssa sylvatica</i>). Prominent understory components include spicebush (<i>Lindera benzoin</i>), pawpaw (<i>Asimina triloba</i>), American hornbeam (<i>Carpinus caroliniana</i>), witchhazel (<i>Hamamelis virginiana</i>), and eastern redbud (<i>Cercis canadensis</i>). Few species predominate numerically on the plot; seven species have &gt;1000 individuals (71.3% of the total). Mean stand density was 1179 living individuals/ha, while mean basal area was 34.1 m²/ha. Of the total plot area, 4 ha have had white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) exclusion since 1990. Woody seedling surveys from 2010–2012 in 354 1-m² plots measured 19,415 seedlings of 47 species, from new germinants up to 1 cm DBH. Community-wide seed rain data from 200 0.5-m² litterfall traps yielded a total of 9197 records from 37 species. Long-term seed data collected from 1986–2011 for Quercus and Carya within the exclosure and two replicate sites are also presented, documenting considerable annual variation in mast production. Dendrochronological data from 492 tree cores suggested the major canopy trees established circa 1900, but scattered trees of several species existed earlier. Large-scale forest dynamics plots employing standardized methodology have a long, rich history in the tropics. Similar plots in the temperate zone have been largely lacking, however. The SCBI plot represents one of the first of its kind in the Smithsonian Global Earth Observatory’s recently established network of such plots, complementing its well-known network of tropical forest plots and enabling comparative studies on forest ecology and climate change at the global scale. <i>Key words</i>: <i>census; deer exclusion; dendrochronology; mast production; seed rain; seedling dynamics; temperate forest; temperate trees.</i>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557442
title: Data Paper. Data Paper

description: File List dissections 54_09.txt (MD5: 909e1aad967c361ac3d0d21814a13653) Description Total body size, mass or linear measurements, and gonad mass or volumes have been recorded for the North American Pacific coast sea urchins <i>Strongylocentrotus purpuratus,</i> <i>Mesocentrotus (Strongylocentrotus)</i> <i>franciscanus, </i>and <i>Lytechinus pictus</i> by various workers at diverse sites and for varying lengths of time from 1954 to 2009. Some dissections included other body components such as the gut, body wall, and Aristotle's lantern, and some dissections included both wet and dry mass. There are numerous peer-reviewed publications that have used some of these data, but some data have appeared only in graduate theses or in the gray literature. There also are data that have never appeared outside the original data sheets. Historically, data were used to describe reproductive cycles and then to compare responses to stressors such as food limitation or pollution. Differences in temperature among sites also have been explored. More recently, dissection data have linked gonad development to ocean conditions, so called bottom-up forcing. The data set presented here is a historical record of gonad development for a common group of marine invertebrates in intertidal and nearshore environments, which can be used to test hypotheses concerning future changes associated with climate change and ocean acidification along the Pacific Coast of North America. <i>Key words</i>: <i>allometry; gonad index; historical data; intertidal; </i>Lytechinus; Mesocentrotus;<i> North America; Pacific coast; reproduction; sea urchins; </i>Strongylocentrotus;<i> subtidal. </i>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557442.v1
title: Data Paper. Data Paper

description: File List dissections 54_09.txt (MD5: 909e1aad967c361ac3d0d21814a13653) Description Total body size, mass or linear measurements, and gonad mass or volumes have been recorded for the North American Pacific coast sea urchins <i>Strongylocentrotus purpuratus,</i> <i>Mesocentrotus (Strongylocentrotus)</i> <i>franciscanus, </i>and <i>Lytechinus pictus</i> by various workers at diverse sites and for varying lengths of time from 1954 to 2009. Some dissections included other body components such as the gut, body wall, and Aristotle's lantern, and some dissections included both wet and dry mass. There are numerous peer-reviewed publications that have used some of these data, but some data have appeared only in graduate theses or in the gray literature. There also are data that have never appeared outside the original data sheets. Historically, data were used to describe reproductive cycles and then to compare responses to stressors such as food limitation or pollution. Differences in temperature among sites also have been explored. More recently, dissection data have linked gonad development to ocean conditions, so called bottom-up forcing. The data set presented here is a historical record of gonad development for a common group of marine invertebrates in intertidal and nearshore environments, which can be used to test hypotheses concerning future changes associated with climate change and ocean acidification along the Pacific Coast of North America. <i>Key words</i>: <i>allometry; gonad index; historical data; intertidal; </i>Lytechinus; Mesocentrotus;<i> North America; Pacific coast; reproduction; sea urchins; </i>Strongylocentrotus;<i> subtidal. </i>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557439
title: Data Paper. Data Paper

description: File List NZ_Bd_data_1930-2010.txt (MD5: e078da2e89d8554eb11e1a3b52d972be) Description Chytridiomycosis caused by the fungal invasive pathogen <i>Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis</i> (Bd) was first detected in 1999 in Christchurch, New Zealand, in the Australian introduced frog species <i>Litoria raniformis</i>. It was detected in wild native frogs in the critically endangered <i>Leiopelma archeyi</i> in 2001 on the Coromandel Peninsula and has been suggested as responsible for a mass decline (88%) in that population between 1994 and 2002. We report the current distribution, host species and prevalence, where known, of Bd in New Zealand, which is essential for conservation management of New Zealand native frogs (<i>Leiopelma</i> spp.). The data set is structured so that it can be readily added to the Australian Bd database for further analyses. Our data included all regions in New Zealand and six offshore islands at 135 sites with 704 records from 23 contributors spanning collection dates 1930–2010. We report 54 positive sites from 132 positive individuals. We also detail negative findings, but declaring an area free from disease should consider the sensitivity of the test used and numbers of individuals tested. The data also included a comprehensive museum survey testing 152 individuals from five species (20 <i>L</i>. <i>archeyi</i>, 50 <i>L</i>. <i>hochstetteri</i>, 15 <i>L</i>. <i>aurea</i>, 40 <i>L</i>. <i>ewingii,</i> and 27 <i>L</i>. <i>raniformis</i>) from 1930–1999 using histology and Bd specific immunohistochemistry. All museum specimens were negative, so the 1999 positive result is still the earliest record. In the <i>L. archeyi</i> Coromandel Ranges population, the period prevalence of Bd from 2006–2010 was relatively stable at 16%, but the number of animals tested remains low (up to <i>N </i>= 19) due to the now depleted population numbers. The period prevalence of Bd in the <i>L. archeyi</i> Whareorino population has remained both consistent and low (6%) between 2005 and 2010. In <i>L. hochstetteri</i>,<i> L</i>. <i>hamiltoni,</i> and<i> L</i>.<i> pakeka </i>all sampling for Bd has been negative. Positive Bd results have been found in all three <i>Litoria</i> spp., but Bd has not been found in the six offshore areas tested. Most data have been previously unpublished and represent the first confirmed reports of Bd in many regions and species in New Zealand. <i>Key words</i>: <i>amphibian chytrid fungus; </i>Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis;<i> chytridiomycosis; frog; infectious disease; </i>Leiopelma; Litoria;<i> mapping; New Zealand.</i>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12911516.v1
title: R0193_20171006a_videos

description: Rat 0193, skilled reaching data collected in Leventhal laboratory by Alexandra Bova
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557436
title: Appendix A. Likelihood calculations.

description: Likelihood calculations.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557436.v1
title: Appendix A. Likelihood calculations.

description: Likelihood calculations.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557433
title: Appendix B. Figures for Scenario 1.

description: Figures for Scenario 1.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12911558.v1
title: R0193_20171008a_videos

description: Rat 0193, skilled reaching data collected in Leventhal laboratory by Alexandra Bova
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557433.v1
title: Appendix B. Figures for Scenario 1.

description: Figures for Scenario 1.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557430
title: Appendix C. Figures for Scenario 2.

description: Figures for Scenario 2.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557430.v1
title: Appendix C. Figures for Scenario 2.

description: Figures for Scenario 2.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557427
title: Appendix D. Figures for Scenario 3.

description: Figures for Scenario 3.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557427.v1
title: Appendix D. Figures for Scenario 3.

description: Figures for Scenario 3.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557424
title: Supplement 1. Matlab functions for fitting the models in Scenario 3.

description: File List fitModel.m (MD5: dcf2f5a898ddf08cc71f14dbafabd124) fullNLL.m (MD5: 514a14611653186dabcf5bff28bfa50f) kalman.m (MD5: d1f7404cbf0f8bc9ecce730023f2a891) Description fitModel.m fits a data set simulated under Scenario 3.<br> fullNLL.m computes the likelihood for the full ML method.<br> kalman.m is an implementation of the kalman filter used by fitModel.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557424.v1
title: Supplement 1. Matlab functions for fitting the models in Scenario 3.

description: File List fitModel.m (MD5: dcf2f5a898ddf08cc71f14dbafabd124) fullNLL.m (MD5: 514a14611653186dabcf5bff28bfa50f) kalman.m (MD5: d1f7404cbf0f8bc9ecce730023f2a891) Description fitModel.m fits a data set simulated under Scenario 3.<br> fullNLL.m computes the likelihood for the full ML method.<br> kalman.m is an implementation of the kalman filter used by fitModel.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557421
title: Appendix A. Analytical maximum-likelihood estimators of θ from Eqs. 7 and 8.

description: Analytical maximum-likelihood estimators of θ from Eqs. 7 and 8.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557421.v1
title: Appendix A. Analytical maximum-likelihood estimators of θ from Eqs. 7 and 8.

description: Analytical maximum-likelihood estimators of θ from Eqs. 7 and 8.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557418
title: Appendix B. Parameter estimates, confidence intervals, and figure results from fitting the stochastic linear immigration–death model to example sage-grouse fence collision data set.

description: Parameter estimates, confidence intervals, and figure results from fitting the stochastic linear immigration–death model to example sage-grouse fence collision data set.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557418.v1
title: Appendix B. Parameter estimates, confidence intervals, and figure results from fitting the stochastic linear immigration–death model to example sage-grouse fence collision data set.

description: Parameter estimates, confidence intervals, and figure results from fitting the stochastic linear immigration–death model to example sage-grouse fence collision data set.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557415
title: Appendix C. Profile-likelihood plots for regression coefficients and model-evaluation plots for the top stochastic linear immigration–death model fit to example sage-grouse fence collision data set.

description: Profile-likelihood plots for regression coefficients and model-evaluation plots for the top stochastic linear immigration–death model fit to example sage-grouse fence collision data set.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557415.v1
title: Appendix C. Profile-likelihood plots for regression coefficients and model-evaluation plots for the top stochastic linear immigration–death model fit to example sage-grouse fence collision data set.

description: Profile-likelihood plots for regression coefficients and model-evaluation plots for the top stochastic linear immigration–death model fit to example sage-grouse fence collision data set.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557412
title: Supplement 1. R code for fitting the stochastic linear immigration–death model to example sage-grouse fence collision data.

description: File List Supplement_1.R (MD5: e8c1b49374d7d7987f6838e9b8d5c01a)Description This supplement contains annotated R code for fitting the stochastic linear immigration–death model to the sage-grouse fence collision data set from Idaho, USA.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557412.v1
title: Supplement 1. R code for fitting the stochastic linear immigration–death model to example sage-grouse fence collision data.

description: File List Supplement_1.R (MD5: e8c1b49374d7d7987f6838e9b8d5c01a)Description This supplement contains annotated R code for fitting the stochastic linear immigration–death model to the sage-grouse fence collision data set from Idaho, USA.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557409
title: Supplement 2. R code for constructing profile likelihood confidence intervals and evaluating fit of the stochastic linear immigration–death model fit to example sage-grouse fence collision data.

description: File List Supplement_2.R (MD5: b05dd735edcbbea4272aef683b862de8)Description This supplement contains annotated R code for constructing profile likelihood confidence intervals, conducting goodness-of-fit testing, and generating model-evaluation plots for the stochastic-linear-immigration-death model to the sage-grouse fence collision data set from Idaho, USA.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557409.v1
title: Supplement 2. R code for constructing profile likelihood confidence intervals and evaluating fit of the stochastic linear immigration–death model fit to example sage-grouse fence collision data.

description: File List Supplement_2.R (MD5: b05dd735edcbbea4272aef683b862de8)Description This supplement contains annotated R code for constructing profile likelihood confidence intervals, conducting goodness-of-fit testing, and generating model-evaluation plots for the stochastic-linear-immigration-death model to the sage-grouse fence collision data set from Idaho, USA.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557406
title: Appendix A. Table with covariate data on the female elk used in the analyses.

description: Table with covariate data on the female elk used in the analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557406.v1
title: Appendix A. Table with covariate data on the female elk used in the analyses.

description: Table with covariate data on the female elk used in the analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557403
title: Appendix B. Table with covariate data on the direct observations of elk groups used in the analyses.

description: Table with covariate data on the direct observations of elk groups used in the analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557403.v1
title: Appendix B. Table with covariate data on the direct observations of elk groups used in the analyses.

description: Table with covariate data on the direct observations of elk groups used in the analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3557400
title: Appendix C. Details of a simulation study to assess the statistical properties of the hierarchical model with multiple random effects and sparse observational sampling.

description: Details of a simulation study to assess the statistical properties of the hierarchical model with multiple random effects and sparse observational sampling.