DOI: 10.21954/ou.rd.25702881.v1
title: <b>Appendices </b>from PhD thesis <b>"Critical element mobilisation </b><b>during metapelite melting and retrogression"</b>

description: These files are appendices associated with Elisa Oliveira da Costa's PhD thesis:Appendix A – Summary of information about samples analysed by geochemical techniques during this investigation.Appendix B.1 – Excel spreadsheet with quality check of Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Electron Probe Micro Analyser (EPMA) data, and metadata for EPMA analysis at the University of Utrecht.Sheet 1: Quality check of SEM standard (GEO MkII standard).Sheet 2: Chart showing quality check of SEM standard (GEO MkII standard) for SiO2, Al2O3, FeO, MgO, CaO.Sheet 3: Chart showing quality check of SEM standard (GEO MkII standard) for MnO.Sheet 4: Comparison between SEM and EPMA data for sample L14G.Sheet 5: Chart showing the comparison between SEM and EPMA data for sample L14G.Sheet 6: Data quality check of standard (R10) during EPMA analysis at the University of Utrecht.Sheet 7: Metadata for EPMA analysis at the University of Utrecht.Appendix B.2 – Mineral chemistry calculations.Appendix C.1 – Metadata of LA-ICP-MS analysis of biotite, muscovite, chlorite, feldspars, garnet, cordierite and pinite at the Open University.Appendix C.2 – Metadata of LA-ICP-MS analysis of ilmenite and rutile at the Open University.Appendix D – List of masses analysed by LA-ICP-MS at the Open University and their detection limits.Appendix E – Quality check of LA-ICP-MS analysis.<br>Appendix F – Bulk-rock analysis detection limits.Appendix G - Whole-rock results and quality checkSheet 1: Samples bulk-rock major and trace element analysis results from ActLabs.Sheet 2: Quality check of Actlabs results.Sheet 3: Chart showing quality check of major elements for ActLabs results.Sheet 4: Chart showing quality check of trace elements for ActLabs results.Sheet 5: Samples bulk-rock major and trace element analysis results from ALS Global.Sheet 6: Quality check of ALS Global results.Sheet 7: Chart showing quality check of trace elements for ALS Global results.Sheet 8: Comparison of ActLabs and ALS Global results.Appendix H – Results from Chapter 3Sheet 1.1: Sub-compilation of pelites from the global-geochemistry database of Gard et al. (2019).Sheet 1.2: Sub-compilation of metapelites from the global-geochemistry database of Gard et al. (2019).Sheet 2: Composition of the pelite used for phase equilibria modelling (in green). The composition used by White et al. (2014) is shown to demonstrate the difference in TiO2 between systems.Sheet 3: Phase proportions and melting reactions at 4 kbar without water extraction and with water extraction, and at 8 kbar (left) and phase proportions recalculated without melt (right).Sheet 4: Compilation of partition coefficients used for modelling work.Sheet 5.1: Calculation of trace element trends during partial melting using Rudnick and Gao 2014 Upper Crust Average as the starting trace concentration and minimum values of distribution coefficients.Sheet 5.2: Calculation of trace element trends during partial melting using Rudnick and Gao 2014 Upper Crust Average as the starting trace concentration and preferred values of distribution coefficients.Sheet 5.3: Calculation of trace element trends during partial melting using Rudnick and Gao 2014 Upper Crust Average as the starting trace concentration and maximum values of distribution coefficients.Sheet 6: Fractional crystallization modelling.Appendix J – Chapter 4 dataSheet 1: Bulk rock major and trace element composition from ALSGlobal and Actlabs.Sheet 2: In situ mineral major composition, atoms per formula unit, geothermometer estimates and trace element concentrations.Sheet 3: Calculation of Sn and W melt concentrations during partial melting of an average pelite using Rudnick and Gao (2014) Upper Crust Average as the starting trace concentration.Appendix L – Chapter 5 Chloritization dataSheet 1: Complete list of results for each point analysis of sample PT22A (major oxides, atom per formula unit, geothermometry, and trace element point).Sheet 2: Reaction stoichiometry calculation.Sheet 3: Bulk rock composition, normalised composition, and fresh and altered domain calculated composition of sample PT22A.Sheet 4: Sample PT22A altered and fresh domain composition calculations.Sheet 5: Summary of maximum, average and minimum concentration of trace elements in each mineral of sample PT22A.Sheet 6: Mass transfer estimate through a stoichiometric and visual estimate of phase proportion and maximum, average, and minimum concentrations of trace elements in each mineral in the reaction.Appendix N – Chapter 5 Pinitization dataSheet 1: Summary of major and trace elements concentration ranges in cordierite and pinite in each sample.Sheet 2: Complete major oxides, atoms per formula unit and trace elements data for each point analysis.Sheet 3: Comparison of cordierite major oxides acquired with scanning electron microscope and/or electron probe micro analyser with major elements acquired by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer.Sheet 4: Comparison of pinite major oxides acquired with scanning electron microscope and/or electron probe micro analyser with major elements acquired by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer. The comparison is likely more scattered due to analyses of fine-grained aggregates instead of single crystals.Appendix O – Unused samples dataSheet 1: In situ mineral trace element concentration.Sheet 2: Mineral major element compositions acquired by EDS-SEM (samples N34 and K5538).Sheet 3: Mineral major element compositions acquired by EPMA (samples CZ03, CZ08, PT01, and repeated points from samples K5538).Appendix P. Fieldwork notes (outcrop coordinates and description, photographs and samples taken).<br>