cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513176.v1
title: Appendix B. Morphological measurements for all Calonectris breeding colonies included in the biometric analysis.

description: Morphological measurements for all Calonectris breeding colonies included in the biometric analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513173
title: Appendix C. Mean and standard deviation of stable isotopes signatures and trace elements concentrations of Cory's Shearwater and the Cape Verde Shearwater breeding colonies.

description: Mean and standard deviation of stable isotopes signatures and trace elements concentrations of Cory's Shearwater and the Cape Verde Shearwater breeding colonies.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513173.v1
title: Appendix C. Mean and standard deviation of stable isotopes signatures and trace elements concentrations of Cory's Shearwater and the Cape Verde Shearwater breeding colonies.

description: Mean and standard deviation of stable isotopes signatures and trace elements concentrations of Cory's Shearwater and the Cape Verde Shearwater breeding colonies.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513170
title: Appendix D. Regression models on the latitudinal and longitudinal gradients in stable isotopes signatures, trace elements concentrations, and morphometric measurements.

description: Regression models on the latitudinal and longitudinal gradients in stable isotopes signatures, trace elements concentrations, and morphometric measurements.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513170.v1
title: Appendix D. Regression models on the latitudinal and longitudinal gradients in stable isotopes signatures, trace elements concentrations, and morphometric measurements.

description: Regression models on the latitudinal and longitudinal gradients in stable isotopes signatures, trace elements concentrations, and morphometric measurements.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513167
title: Appendix A. A table showing habitat variables measured that were candidates for each selection order or grain model.

description: A table showing habitat variables measured that were candidates for each selection order or grain model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513167.v1
title: Appendix A. A table showing habitat variables measured that were candidates for each selection order or grain model.

description: A table showing habitat variables measured that were candidates for each selection order or grain model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513164
title: Appendix B. A table showing the top five candidate models based on selection orders ranked by Akaike weight.

description: A table showing the top five candidate models based on selection orders ranked by Akaike weight.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513164.v1
title: Appendix B. A table showing the top five candidate models based on selection orders ranked by Akaike weight.

description: A table showing the top five candidate models based on selection orders ranked by Akaike weight.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513161
title: Appendix A. Additional notes on the reflectivity of the fur of the Japanese serow.

description: Additional notes on the reflectivity of the fur of the Japanese serow.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513161.v1
title: Appendix A. Additional notes on the reflectivity of the fur of the Japanese serow.

description: Additional notes on the reflectivity of the fur of the Japanese serow.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513158
title: Appendix B. Sensitivity analysis for the energetics model.

description: Sensitivity analysis for the energetics model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513158.v1
title: Appendix B. Sensitivity analysis for the energetics model.

description: Sensitivity analysis for the energetics model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513155
title: Appendix C. Input data used in the five-prefecture simulations.

description: Input data used in the five-prefecture simulations.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513155.v1
title: Appendix C. Input data used in the five-prefecture simulations.

description: Input data used in the five-prefecture simulations.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513152
title: Appendix D. Microclimate input parameters for single-site simulation (Takada).

description: Microclimate input parameters for single-site simulation (Takada).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513152.v1
title: Appendix D. Microclimate input parameters for single-site simulation (Takada).

description: Microclimate input parameters for single-site simulation (Takada).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513149
title: Appendix E. Account for within-cell heterogeneity for February data.

description: Account for within-cell heterogeneity for February data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513149.v1
title: Appendix E. Account for within-cell heterogeneity for February data.

description: Account for within-cell heterogeneity for February data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513146
title: Appendix A. Maps depicting the relative probability of occurrence of male grizzly bears in the mountain landscape of the Parsnip River study area, British Columbia, Canada, 1998–2003, based on study-wide extent, home range extent, and buffer extent.

description: Maps depicting the relative probability of occurrence of male grizzly bears in the mountain landscape of the Parsnip River study area, British Columbia, Canada, 1998–2003, based on study-wide extent, home range extent, and buffer extent.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513146.v1
title: Appendix A. Maps depicting the relative probability of occurrence of male grizzly bears in the mountain landscape of the Parsnip River study area, British Columbia, Canada, 1998–2003, based on study-wide extent, home range extent, and buffer extent.

description: Maps depicting the relative probability of occurrence of male grizzly bears in the mountain landscape of the Parsnip River study area, British Columbia, Canada, 1998–2003, based on study-wide extent, home range extent, and buffer extent.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513143
title: Appendix B. Maps depicting the relative probability of occurrence of male grizzly bears in the plateau landscape of the Parsnip River study area, British Columbia, Canada, 1998–2003, based on study-wide extent, home range extent, and buffer extent.

description: Maps depicting the relative probability of occurrence of male grizzly bears in the plateau landscape of the Parsnip River study area, British Columbia, Canada, 1998–2003, based on study-wide extent, home range extent, and buffer extent.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513143.v1
title: Appendix B. Maps depicting the relative probability of occurrence of male grizzly bears in the plateau landscape of the Parsnip River study area, British Columbia, Canada, 1998–2003, based on study-wide extent, home range extent, and buffer extent.

description: Maps depicting the relative probability of occurrence of male grizzly bears in the plateau landscape of the Parsnip River study area, British Columbia, Canada, 1998–2003, based on study-wide extent, home range extent, and buffer extent.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513140
title: Appendix C. Maps depicting the relative probability of occurrence of female grizzly bears in the mountain landscape of the Parsnip River study area, British Columbia, Canada, 1998–2003, based on study-wide extent, home range extent, and buffer extent.

description: Maps depicting the relative probability of occurrence of female grizzly bears in the mountain landscape of the Parsnip River study area, British Columbia, Canada, 1998–2003, based on study-wide extent, home range extent, and buffer extent.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513140.v1
title: Appendix C. Maps depicting the relative probability of occurrence of female grizzly bears in the mountain landscape of the Parsnip River study area, British Columbia, Canada, 1998–2003, based on study-wide extent, home range extent, and buffer extent.

description: Maps depicting the relative probability of occurrence of female grizzly bears in the mountain landscape of the Parsnip River study area, British Columbia, Canada, 1998–2003, based on study-wide extent, home range extent, and buffer extent.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513137
title: Appendix D. Maps depicting the relative probability of occurrence of female grizzly bears in the plateau landscape of the Parsnip River study area, British Columbia, Canada, 1998–2003, based on study-wide extent, home range extent, and buffer extent.

description: Maps depicting the relative probability of occurrence of female grizzly bears in the plateau landscape of the Parsnip River study area, British Columbia, Canada, 1998–2003, based on study-wide extent, home range extent, and buffer extent.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513137.v1
title: Appendix D. Maps depicting the relative probability of occurrence of female grizzly bears in the plateau landscape of the Parsnip River study area, British Columbia, Canada, 1998–2003, based on study-wide extent, home range extent, and buffer extent.

description: Maps depicting the relative probability of occurrence of female grizzly bears in the plateau landscape of the Parsnip River study area, British Columbia, Canada, 1998–2003, based on study-wide extent, home range extent, and buffer extent.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513134
title: Appendix A. Figures depicting the definition of turning angle between segments, criteria for a significant movement bout, distance vs. turning angle, and a histogram of turning angles.

description: Figures depicting the definition of turning angle between segments, criteria for a significant movement bout, distance vs. turning angle, and a histogram of turning angles.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513134.v1
title: Appendix A. Figures depicting the definition of turning angle between segments, criteria for a significant movement bout, distance vs. turning angle, and a histogram of turning angles.

description: Figures depicting the definition of turning angle between segments, criteria for a significant movement bout, distance vs. turning angle, and a histogram of turning angles.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513131
title: Appendix B. A description of a priori hypothesized effects for each covariate on the response variables listing the candidate sets for bison travel analysis.

description: A description of a priori hypothesized effects for each covariate on the response variables listing the candidate sets for bison travel analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513128
title: Appendix C. Tables listing model results and parameter coeffcient estimates for the two exploratory long-distance travel modeling exercises.

description: Tables listing model results and parameter coeffcient estimates for the two exploratory long-distance travel modeling exercises.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513131.v1
title: Appendix B. A description of a priori hypothesized effects for each covariate on the response variables listing the candidate sets for bison travel analysis.

description: A description of a priori hypothesized effects for each covariate on the response variables listing the candidate sets for bison travel analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513128.v1
title: Appendix C. Tables listing model results and parameter coeffcient estimates for the two exploratory long-distance travel modeling exercises.

description: Tables listing model results and parameter coeffcient estimates for the two exploratory long-distance travel modeling exercises.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513125
title: Appendix D. A map of predicted travel probability from top approximating exploratory model and fine-scale maps of predicted travel probabilities for areas throughout central Yellowstone.

description: A map of predicted travel probability from top approximating exploratory model and fine-scale maps of predicted travel probabilities for areas throughout central Yellowstone.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513125.v1
title: Appendix D. A map of predicted travel probability from top approximating exploratory model and fine-scale maps of predicted travel probabilities for areas throughout central Yellowstone.

description: A map of predicted travel probability from top approximating exploratory model and fine-scale maps of predicted travel probabilities for areas throughout central Yellowstone.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513122
title: Appendix E. Maps of predicted travel probability from top approximating models for general and long-distance bison travel throughout central Yellowstone.

description: Maps of predicted travel probability from top approximating models for general and long-distance bison travel throughout central Yellowstone.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513122.v1
title: Appendix E. Maps of predicted travel probability from top approximating models for general and long-distance bison travel throughout central Yellowstone.

description: Maps of predicted travel probability from top approximating models for general and long-distance bison travel throughout central Yellowstone.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513119
title: Appendix A. Summary of the 16 models used to estimate occupancy () and colonization () rates for the long-toed salamander (Ambystoma macrodactylum) and Columbia spotted frog (Rana luteiventris).

description: Summary of the 16 models used to estimate occupancy () and colonization () rates for the long-toed salamander (Ambystoma macrodactylum) and Columbia spotted frog (Rana luteiventris).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513119.v1
title: Appendix A. Summary of the 16 models used to estimate occupancy () and colonization () rates for the long-toed salamander (Ambystoma macrodactylum) and Columbia spotted frog (Rana luteiventris).

description: Summary of the 16 models used to estimate occupancy () and colonization () rates for the long-toed salamander (Ambystoma macrodactylum) and Columbia spotted frog (Rana luteiventris).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513116
title: Index Files

description: Index Files
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513116.v1
title: Index Files

description: Index Files
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513113
title: Appendix A. A discussion of parameter estimation for the RUSLE model, including detailed discussion of C derivation.

description: A discussion of parameter estimation for the RUSLE model, including detailed discussion of C derivation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513113.v1
title: Appendix A. A discussion of parameter estimation for the RUSLE model, including detailed discussion of C derivation.

description: A discussion of parameter estimation for the RUSLE model, including detailed discussion of C derivation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513110
title: Appendix A. Quality control metrics for mercury and nitrogen analyses.

description: Quality control metrics for mercury and nitrogen analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513107
title: Appendix A. Autecological trends of the 30 most common species in the floodplain study sites.

description: Autecological trends of the 30 most common species in the floodplain study sites.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513104
title: Appendix A. Selected structural characteristics of 91 aspen stands across the landscape in the Canyon Lakes District of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest in Larimer County, Colorado.

description: Selected structural characteristics of 91 aspen stands across the landscape in the Canyon Lakes District of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest in Larimer County, Colorado.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513107.v1
title: Appendix A. Autecological trends of the 30 most common species in the floodplain study sites.

description: Autecological trends of the 30 most common species in the floodplain study sites.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513104.v1
title: Appendix A. Selected structural characteristics of 91 aspen stands across the landscape in the Canyon Lakes District of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest in Larimer County, Colorado.

description: Selected structural characteristics of 91 aspen stands across the landscape in the Canyon Lakes District of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest in Larimer County, Colorado.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513101
title: Appendix B. Standardized canonical coefficients of the first three canonical variates using five independent variables of quaking aspen stand structure.

description: Standardized canonical coefficients of the first three canonical variates using five independent variables of quaking aspen stand structure.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513101.v1
title: Appendix B. Standardized canonical coefficients of the first three canonical variates using five independent variables of quaking aspen stand structure.

description: Standardized canonical coefficients of the first three canonical variates using five independent variables of quaking aspen stand structure.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513098
title: Appendix C. Regeneration response of quaking aspen ramets approximately 20 years following clearcutting in lodgepole pine forests of different ages in the Canyon Lakes District of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest, Colorado.

description: Regeneration response of quaking aspen ramets approximately 20 years following clearcutting in lodgepole pine forests of different ages in the Canyon Lakes District of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest, Colorado.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513098.v1
title: Appendix C. Regeneration response of quaking aspen ramets approximately 20 years following clearcutting in lodgepole pine forests of different ages in the Canyon Lakes District of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest, Colorado.

description: Regeneration response of quaking aspen ramets approximately 20 years following clearcutting in lodgepole pine forests of different ages in the Canyon Lakes District of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest, Colorado.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513095
title: Appendix A. Two tables with the bird and bumble bee species found, including functional groups for birds.

description: Two tables with the bird and bumble bee species found, including functional groups for birds.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513092
title: Appendix B. A list of interview and survey sources.

description: A list of interview and survey sources.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513089
title: Appendix C. The guide for the open-ended interviews.

description: The guide for the open-ended interviews.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513086
title: Supplement 1. Fire detections in tropical reserves and their buffer areas.

description: File List firepark.txt -- tab-delimited ascii file Description The firepark.txt file is a tab-separated ascii file. The file contains numbers of fire detections and areas for 3964 tropical and subtropical reserves. Column definitions: 1 = Names of countries from the WDPA database 2 = First name of reserve in the WDPA database 3 = Second name of reserve in the WDPA database 4 = Third name of reserve in the WDPA database 5 = Fourth name of reserve in the WDPA database 6 = Fifth name of reserve in the WDPA database 7 = Sixth name of reserve in the WDPA database 8 = Seventh name of reserve in the WDPA database 9 = Eighth name of reserve in the WDPA database 10 = fire detection density for 15 km buffer (number of detections km<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>) 11 = fire detection density for 10 km buffer (number of detections km<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>) 12 = fire detection density for 5 km buffer (number of detections km<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>) 13 = fire detection density for reserve (number of detections km<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup>) 14 = Number of 2002 fire detections inside park 15 = Number of 2003 fire detections inside park 16 = Number of 2004 fire detections inside park 17 = Area of reserve provided by the WDPA (hectares) 18 = Area of reserve in our GIS analysis(hectares) 19 = Number of 2002 fire detections in 15-km buffer area 20 = Number of 2003 fire detections in 15-km buffer area 21 = Number of 2004 fire detections in 15-km buffer area 22 = Number of hectares in 15-km buffer area 23 = Number of 2002 fire detections in 10-km buffer area 24 = Number of 2003 fire detections in 10-km buffer area 25 = Number of 2004 fire detections in 10-km buffer area 26 = Number of hectares in 10-km buffer area 27 = Number of 2002 fire detections in 5-km buffer area 28 = Number of 2003 fire detections in 5-km buffer area 29 = Number of 2004 fire detections in 5-km buffer area 30 = Number of hectares in 5-km buffer area 31 = proportion of reserve comprised by savannah in our GIS 32 = proportion of reserve comprised by tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf forest in our GIS 33 = proportion of reserve comprised by tropical and subtropical coniferous forest in our GIS 34 = proportion of reserve comprised by tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forest in our GIS 35 = Latitude of reserve center from the WDPA 36 = Longitude of reserve center from the WDPA 37 = IUCN management category of the reserve from the WDPA 38 = YES if a border of a reserve is on any body of water, NO otherwise. Evaluated by examining reserve polygons on country-level maps for PRP_WETFRST&gt;0.9, AREAGIS1 &gt; 5000, and CNTRY_NAME$&lt;&gt;’China’. 39 = identifies the five largest islands for Indonesia, Borneo for Malaysia, and Okinawa for Japan. The value ‘island’ identifies smaller Indonesian islands. The value ‘volcano’ identifies reserves with an active volcano that triggered MODIS fire detections. The value ‘city’ identifies one Philippine reserve presumably mistakenly located in a city.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3513083
title: Appendix A. Cross-pollination rate approximation.

description: Cross-pollination rate approximation.