cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/x4ankj
title: Replication Data for: Estimating Major League Baseball Team Quality through Simulation: An Analysis of an Alternative Pythagorean Expected Wins Model

description: Background. Contests are games in which the players compete for a prize and exert effort to increase their probability of winning. For sport contests, analysts often use the Pythagorean model to estimate teams’ expected wins (quality). We ask if there are alternative contest models that minimize error or information loss from misspecification and outperform the Pythagorean model. 
Aim. This article aims to use simulated data to select the optimal expected wins model among the choice of relevant alternatives. The choices include the traditional Pythagorean model and the difference-form contest success functions (CSF). 
Method. We simulate 1,000 iterations of the 2014 MLB season for the purpose of estimating and analyzing alternative models of expected wins (team quality). We use the open-source, Strategic Baseball Simulator and develop an AutoHotKey script that programmatically executes the SBS application, chooses the correct settings for the 2014 season, enters a unique ID for the simulation data file, and iterates these steps 1,000 times. We estimate expected wins using the traditional Pythagorean model, as well as the difference-form CSF model that is used in game theory and public choice economics. Each model is estimated while accounting for fixed (team) effects.
Result. We find that the difference-form CSF model outperforms the traditional Pythagorean model in terms of explanatory power and in terms of misspecification-based information loss as estimated by the Akaike Information Criterion. Through parametric estimation, we further confirm that the simulator yields realistic statistical outcomes.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/6uuetx
title: PDB - 6OC7: HMP42 mAb in complex with Protein G from Streptococcus group G, (311K, 38°C, 100 ns): RMSD, SASA, RMSF, Rg, H-bonds

description: PDB - 6OC7: HMP42 mAb in complex with Protein G from Streptococcus group G, (311K, 38°C, 100 ns): RMSD, SASA, RMSF, Rg, H-bonds
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/g5biei
title: Replication Data for: "O que pensam os candidatos a prefeito sobre a reforma política? Resultados de um survey nacional em 2016"

description: Replication Data for: "O que pensam os candidatos a prefeito sobre a reforma política? Resultados de um survey nacional em 2016"

Survey online realizado com candidatos a prefeito nos municípios brasileiros em 2016
DOI: 10.57967/hf/5697
title: clarity_eval
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/vv6ybg
title: Prolactin and inflammatory cytokines in hemodialysis patients: a cross-sectional study

description: Research data
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/6jwrq5
title: META (Measuring Early Treatment Adherence) Study

description: The META (Measuring Early Treatment Adherence) Study prospectively assessed adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) in three groups: 1) men and non-pregnant women with CD4 &gt;350 cells/ul and no symptoms, 2) pregnant women with CD4 &gt;350 cells/ul and no symptoms, and 3) men and non-pregnant women with CD4 &lt;200 cells/ul. The goal was to determine if ART adherence varied by experience with HIV and any related illness and/or pregnancy. The study was conducted in southwestern Uganda and Cape Town, South Africa from 2015-2018 and involved follow up of 904 participants at 6 months and 12 months post-ART initiation. Available data include demographics, socio-behavioral factors, electronic adherence records, and HIV RNA levels.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/7q8tdf
title: Passed Resolves; Resolves 1797, c.48, SC1/series 228, Petition of Sarah Phillips

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Support for individuals &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25455131"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25455131&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1797-06-05 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Grafton &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Several names from a committee &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Sarah Phillips&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Committed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Committed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Females of color signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: Yes &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: Indian woman, [females of color], ["one of the Indian Natives of Grafton"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Grafton tribe, Worcester county, sale, lands, deeds, house, repairing, debts, trustees, Indian guardians, two children &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Resolves 1797, c.48, passed June 23, 1797 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/dymnk
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1851, Docket 13162, SC1/series 231, Petition of J.M. Merrick

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Fugitive slave laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858359"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858359&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Walpole &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Palmer Morey, Walpole; special committee on slavery &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;J.M. Merrick&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Smith Gray&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;George H. Newhall&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;F.W. Bird [Francis W. Bird?]&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Abby F. Bird&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1851-03-05,1851-03-06 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on March 5, 1851 and referred to the special committee on slavery and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on March 6, 1851 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 116 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 85 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 4 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Other male signatures: 27 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: inhabitants, legal voters, other persons, [females], [other males] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Other males and females separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1851, Docket 13162 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/fssvys
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 74-1562
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/gqn6a
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1840, Docket 788, SC1/series 230, Petition of Elijah Cole

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Against the gag rule &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10956354"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10956354&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Fall River &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Nathan Durfee, Fall River &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Elijah Cole&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Samuel S. Chase&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;George W. Davis&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 34 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 34 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: inhabitants &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1840, Docket 788 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/x2tzwx
title: Parliamentary Questions in the German Bundestag Dataset 1980-2017

description: The dataset provides information on the number of parliamentary questions (PQs) tabled in the German Bundestag between 1980 and 2017. It contains party-portfolio dyads and gives information on the number of oral and written PQs that government parties submitted to a ministry in a single legislative period. In addition, the dataset provides several party- and cabinet-specific variables (e.g. issue salience, policy positions) for systematic analyses of questioning behavior in the German Bundestag.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/6ina2o
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 79-1564
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ltzfax
title: HOPS Catalogs: Spectral Line

description: This dataset consists of three catalogs derived from mining the HOPS extended spectral line observations with the ATNF DUCHAMP source finding algorithm. The three catalogs cover the same spectral lines as the extended observations (NH3 (1,1), NH3 (2,2), and H2O masers) and consist of 669 dense molecular clouds. It is 100% complete at the 5σ detection limit of the survey. The catalogues for all three spectral lines are available for download at the HOPS site &lt;a href="https://research.science.mq.edu.au/hops/public/catalogue.php
"&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/dnqrqg
title: FaceBrasil 05

description: Newspaper
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/qcelex
title: FaceBrasil 07

description: Newspaper
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/wzghnc
title: Replication Data for: Mineral Import Behavior in Response to Shocks: A Nonlinear Perspective

description: Data and Programming Codes for the paper: Mineral Import Behavior in Response to Shocks: A Nonlinear Perspective
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/6saiy
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1839, Docket 10525, SC1/series 231, Petition of John B. Thomas

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: To abolish slavery in Washington D.C. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858040"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858040&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Plymouth &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Jeremiah Farris, Plymouth; committee upon that subject &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;John B. Thomas&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;John Washburn&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Thomas Drew&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 75 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 75 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1839, Docket 10525 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/h8vnqv
title: Petition of Zachariah Howwoswee

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Indian guardians &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:12208697"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:12208697&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1811-05 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Gayhead &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Simon Mayhew, Chilmark; several names from a committee &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Zachariah Howwoswee&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Sarah Howwoswee&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Margaret David&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Simon Panue&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Dorcas Panue&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Juditte Pomit&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Abigail Frances&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Peter Tolmon&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1811-06-14,1811-06-15 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the Senate on June 14, 1811 and read and committed and sent for concurrence and received in the House on June 15, 1811 and read and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 10.0 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, read, committed, sent, received, read, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Females of color signatures: 7 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Males of color signatures: 3 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: the few remaining Indians of Gayhead, [males of color], [females of color] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: not column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Native American tribe: Gayhead &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Gay head, rights, appointment, land, in common, support, poor &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: St. 1811, c.78, passed June 25, 1811 &lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/sylvqq
title: Rio de Janeiro Wet Nurses Dataset: Enslaved and Free Women in Rio de Janeiro, 1850

description: The “Rio de Janeiro Wet-Nursing Database” (RJWND) comprises all advertisements for wet nurses for the year of 1850 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, extracted from the city’s main commercial newspaper, Jornal do Commercio. “Mercenary” wet nursing, what contemporaries called the practice of paying for other women to breastfeed their children, was a thriving market throughout the nineteenth century. Enslaved women comprised most wet nurses, with freed women of color and white immigrant women also working in the trade. More rarely, white Brazilian women whose newborns had died advertised their milk. We can draw several conclusions from this data. Most importantly, RJWND demonstrates the ubiquity of wet nursing in urban Brazil. All women participated in this activity, whether as elite mothers not breastfeeding their own children, or as free, freed, freed African, and enslaved women breastfeeding other women’s children. It also sheds light on how enslavers valued wet nurses both for their reproductive labors (wet nursing) and their productive outputs (cleaning, cooking).
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/6k0gjh
title: Replication Data for: Knowledge mapping and evolution of research on older adults' technology acceptance: A bibliometric study from 2013 to 2023

description: Data analyzed in the article of "Knowledge mapping and evolution of research on older adults' technology acceptance: A bibliometric study from 2013 to 2023".
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/g3octc
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 80-1639
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/x3ujyp
title: DREAMS implementation science: Round 2 Data, Malawi

description: The Population Council is the research partner to DREAMS—a global partnership to reduce HIV infections among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in 10 sub-Saharan African countries. DREAMS aims to reduce HIV infections among adolescent girls and young women. This dataset is Round 2 data collection with young Malawian women (aged 15–24 years at Round 1) enrolled in DREAMS programming. All respondents also participated in the Round 1 survey. These data are from a Population Council-led implementation science study to assess the reach and effectiveness of DREAMS programming in two catchment areas.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/t9qaqv
title: Examining the representation of landscape and its emotional value in German-Swiss fiction between 1840 and 1940

description: This repository provides access to the main datasets used in Grisot, G & Herrmann, J. B. (2023) "Examining the representation of landscape and its emotional value in German-Swiss fiction between 1840 and 1940". The data set includes the following items:

(1) a comprehensive list of labelled spatial entities: all_entities_new.Rdata;

(2) a summary of the corpus content: corpus_summary_table.xlsx;

(3) the entire corpus after removing stopwords split in 6: corpus_clean_partitioned.RData (A-G);

(4) the sentiment lexicons for German used in our analyses: sentiment_lexicons.Rdata:

(5) tables with details of various analyses: proportions_spatial_entities.xlsx, proportions_spatial_entities_by_country.xlsx, Spatial_entities_in_Corpus_by_category.xlsx;

(6) information about the content of the sentment lexicons: Sentiment_lexicons_info.xlsx

The study for which this data were collected explores the representation and affective encoding of fictional space in a corpus of Swiss literary prose texts of the 19th and early 20th Century written in German, offering a contribution to spatial and affective literary studies. Motivated by questions about the iconic dichotomy between urban and rural in literary works – and in Swiss literature in particular – we used computational methods to examine the types of space encoded in German-Swiss literature as well as the affective encoding associated with these space types. Taking into account the complexity of cultural perceptions and representations of space across history, we explore questions about affective encoding of rural, urban, and natural fictional spaces, as well as about their role in the construction of ‘Swiss’ national literature.
description: This project was funded by The Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/lykapx
title: Passed Acts; St. 1843, c.69, SC1/series 229

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Great Massachusetts Petition &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13448109"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13448109&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Freetown &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 208 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Unidentified signatures: 208 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: George Latimer [note: this data reflects the information on the spreadsheet submitted by Henry I. Bowditch and William F. Channing to the legislature, which was filed with St. 1843, c.69, passed April 26, 1843. The majority of the Great Massachusetts Petition has not been located.] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: St. 1843, c.69, passed April 26, 1843 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/x6af8i
title: Replication Data for: Twitter and Facebook posts about COVID-19 are less likely to spread misinformation compared to other health topics

description: This repository contains lists of tweet IDs and top-level domain frequency counts that are required to replicate findings in the paper entitled "Twitter and Facebook posts about COVID-19 are less likely to spread misinformation compared to other health topics".