cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.143606.v1/t5
title: "Figure 18a-3" of "Systematic Studies of Elliptic Flow Measurements in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV"

description: Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.
description: We present inclusive charged hadron elliptic flow ($v_2$) measured over the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|$ &lt; 0.35 in Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Results for $v_2$ are presented over a broad range of transverse momentum ($p_{T}$ = 0.2-8.0 GeV/$c$) and centrality (0-60%). To study nonflow effects that are correlations other than collective flow, as well as the fluctuations of $v_2$, we compare two different analysis methods: (1) the event-plane method from two independent subdetectors at forward ($|\eta|$ = 3.1–3.9) and beam ($|\eta|$ &gt; 6.5) pseudorapidities and (2) the two-particle cumulant method extracted using correlations between particles detected at midrapidity. The two event-plane results are consistent within systematic uncertainties over the measured $p_T$ and in centrality 0–40%. There is at most a 20% difference in the $v_2$ between the two event-plane methods in peripheral (40–60%) collisions. The comparisons between the two-particle cumulant results and the standard event-plane measurements are discussed.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.143606.v1/t6
title: "Figure 18a-4" of "Systematic Studies of Elliptic Flow Measurements in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV"

description: Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.
description: We present inclusive charged hadron elliptic flow ($v_2$) measured over the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|$ &lt; 0.35 in Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Results for $v_2$ are presented over a broad range of transverse momentum ($p_{T}$ = 0.2-8.0 GeV/$c$) and centrality (0-60%). To study nonflow effects that are correlations other than collective flow, as well as the fluctuations of $v_2$, we compare two different analysis methods: (1) the event-plane method from two independent subdetectors at forward ($|\eta|$ = 3.1–3.9) and beam ($|\eta|$ &gt; 6.5) pseudorapidities and (2) the two-particle cumulant method extracted using correlations between particles detected at midrapidity. The two event-plane results are consistent within systematic uncertainties over the measured $p_T$ and in centrality 0–40%. There is at most a 20% difference in the $v_2$ between the two event-plane methods in peripheral (40–60%) collisions. The comparisons between the two-particle cumulant results and the standard event-plane measurements are discussed.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.143606.v1/t7
title: "Figure 18a-5" of "Systematic Studies of Elliptic Flow Measurements in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV"

description: Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.
description: We present inclusive charged hadron elliptic flow ($v_2$) measured over the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|$ &lt; 0.35 in Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Results for $v_2$ are presented over a broad range of transverse momentum ($p_{T}$ = 0.2-8.0 GeV/$c$) and centrality (0-60%). To study nonflow effects that are correlations other than collective flow, as well as the fluctuations of $v_2$, we compare two different analysis methods: (1) the event-plane method from two independent subdetectors at forward ($|\eta|$ = 3.1–3.9) and beam ($|\eta|$ &gt; 6.5) pseudorapidities and (2) the two-particle cumulant method extracted using correlations between particles detected at midrapidity. The two event-plane results are consistent within systematic uncertainties over the measured $p_T$ and in centrality 0–40%. There is at most a 20% difference in the $v_2$ between the two event-plane methods in peripheral (40–60%) collisions. The comparisons between the two-particle cumulant results and the standard event-plane measurements are discussed.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.143606.v1/t10
title: "Figure 18b-2" of "Systematic Studies of Elliptic Flow Measurements in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV"

description: Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.
description: We present inclusive charged hadron elliptic flow ($v_2$) measured over the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|$ &lt; 0.35 in Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Results for $v_2$ are presented over a broad range of transverse momentum ($p_{T}$ = 0.2-8.0 GeV/$c$) and centrality (0-60%). To study nonflow effects that are correlations other than collective flow, as well as the fluctuations of $v_2$, we compare two different analysis methods: (1) the event-plane method from two independent subdetectors at forward ($|\eta|$ = 3.1–3.9) and beam ($|\eta|$ &gt; 6.5) pseudorapidities and (2) the two-particle cumulant method extracted using correlations between particles detected at midrapidity. The two event-plane results are consistent within systematic uncertainties over the measured $p_T$ and in centrality 0–40%. There is at most a 20% difference in the $v_2$ between the two event-plane methods in peripheral (40–60%) collisions. The comparisons between the two-particle cumulant results and the standard event-plane measurements are discussed.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.143606.v1/t11
title: "Figure 18b-3" of "Systematic Studies of Elliptic Flow Measurements in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV"

description: Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.
description: We present inclusive charged hadron elliptic flow ($v_2$) measured over the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|$ &lt; 0.35 in Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Results for $v_2$ are presented over a broad range of transverse momentum ($p_{T}$ = 0.2-8.0 GeV/$c$) and centrality (0-60%). To study nonflow effects that are correlations other than collective flow, as well as the fluctuations of $v_2$, we compare two different analysis methods: (1) the event-plane method from two independent subdetectors at forward ($|\eta|$ = 3.1–3.9) and beam ($|\eta|$ &gt; 6.5) pseudorapidities and (2) the two-particle cumulant method extracted using correlations between particles detected at midrapidity. The two event-plane results are consistent within systematic uncertainties over the measured $p_T$ and in centrality 0–40%. There is at most a 20% difference in the $v_2$ between the two event-plane methods in peripheral (40–60%) collisions. The comparisons between the two-particle cumulant results and the standard event-plane measurements are discussed.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.143606.v1/t12
title: "Figure 18c-1" of "Systematic Studies of Elliptic Flow Measurements in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV"

description: Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.
description: We present inclusive charged hadron elliptic flow ($v_2$) measured over the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|$ &lt; 0.35 in Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Results for $v_2$ are presented over a broad range of transverse momentum ($p_{T}$ = 0.2-8.0 GeV/$c$) and centrality (0-60%). To study nonflow effects that are correlations other than collective flow, as well as the fluctuations of $v_2$, we compare two different analysis methods: (1) the event-plane method from two independent subdetectors at forward ($|\eta|$ = 3.1–3.9) and beam ($|\eta|$ &gt; 6.5) pseudorapidities and (2) the two-particle cumulant method extracted using correlations between particles detected at midrapidity. The two event-plane results are consistent within systematic uncertainties over the measured $p_T$ and in centrality 0–40%. There is at most a 20% difference in the $v_2$ between the two event-plane methods in peripheral (40–60%) collisions. The comparisons between the two-particle cumulant results and the standard event-plane measurements are discussed.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.143606.v1/t8
title: "Figure 18a-6" of "Systematic Studies of Elliptic Flow Measurements in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV"

description: Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.
description: We present inclusive charged hadron elliptic flow ($v_2$) measured over the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|$ &lt; 0.35 in Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Results for $v_2$ are presented over a broad range of transverse momentum ($p_{T}$ = 0.2-8.0 GeV/$c$) and centrality (0-60%). To study nonflow effects that are correlations other than collective flow, as well as the fluctuations of $v_2$, we compare two different analysis methods: (1) the event-plane method from two independent subdetectors at forward ($|\eta|$ = 3.1–3.9) and beam ($|\eta|$ &gt; 6.5) pseudorapidities and (2) the two-particle cumulant method extracted using correlations between particles detected at midrapidity. The two event-plane results are consistent within systematic uncertainties over the measured $p_T$ and in centrality 0–40%. There is at most a 20% difference in the $v_2$ between the two event-plane methods in peripheral (40–60%) collisions. The comparisons between the two-particle cumulant results and the standard event-plane measurements are discussed.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.143606.v1/t9
title: "Figure 18b-1" of "Systematic Studies of Elliptic Flow Measurements in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV"

description: Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.
description: We present inclusive charged hadron elliptic flow ($v_2$) measured over the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|$ &lt; 0.35 in Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Results for $v_2$ are presented over a broad range of transverse momentum ($p_{T}$ = 0.2-8.0 GeV/$c$) and centrality (0-60%). To study nonflow effects that are correlations other than collective flow, as well as the fluctuations of $v_2$, we compare two different analysis methods: (1) the event-plane method from two independent subdetectors at forward ($|\eta|$ = 3.1–3.9) and beam ($|\eta|$ &gt; 6.5) pseudorapidities and (2) the two-particle cumulant method extracted using correlations between particles detected at midrapidity. The two event-plane results are consistent within systematic uncertainties over the measured $p_T$ and in centrality 0–40%. There is at most a 20% difference in the $v_2$ between the two event-plane methods in peripheral (40–60%) collisions. The comparisons between the two-particle cumulant results and the standard event-plane measurements are discussed.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.143606.v1/t13
title: "Figure 18c-2" of "Systematic Studies of Elliptic Flow Measurements in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV"

description: Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.
description: We present inclusive charged hadron elliptic flow ($v_2$) measured over the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|$ &lt; 0.35 in Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Results for $v_2$ are presented over a broad range of transverse momentum ($p_{T}$ = 0.2-8.0 GeV/$c$) and centrality (0-60%). To study nonflow effects that are correlations other than collective flow, as well as the fluctuations of $v_2$, we compare two different analysis methods: (1) the event-plane method from two independent subdetectors at forward ($|\eta|$ = 3.1–3.9) and beam ($|\eta|$ &gt; 6.5) pseudorapidities and (2) the two-particle cumulant method extracted using correlations between particles detected at midrapidity. The two event-plane results are consistent within systematic uncertainties over the measured $p_T$ and in centrality 0–40%. There is at most a 20% difference in the $v_2$ between the two event-plane methods in peripheral (40–60%) collisions. The comparisons between the two-particle cumulant results and the standard event-plane measurements are discussed.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.143606.v1/t14
title: "Figure 18c-3" of "Systematic Studies of Elliptic Flow Measurements in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV"

description: Charged hadron $v_2$($p_T$) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from the two-particle cumulant method, the BBC event plane, and the ZDC-SMD event plane for the indicated centralities.
description: We present inclusive charged hadron elliptic flow ($v_2$) measured over the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|$ &lt; 0.35 in Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Results for $v_2$ are presented over a broad range of transverse momentum ($p_{T}$ = 0.2-8.0 GeV/$c$) and centrality (0-60%). To study nonflow effects that are correlations other than collective flow, as well as the fluctuations of $v_2$, we compare two different analysis methods: (1) the event-plane method from two independent subdetectors at forward ($|\eta|$ = 3.1–3.9) and beam ($|\eta|$ &gt; 6.5) pseudorapidities and (2) the two-particle cumulant method extracted using correlations between particles detected at midrapidity. The two event-plane results are consistent within systematic uncertainties over the measured $p_T$ and in centrality 0–40%. There is at most a 20% difference in the $v_2$ between the two event-plane methods in peripheral (40–60%) collisions. The comparisons between the two-particle cumulant results and the standard event-plane measurements are discussed.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.143606.v1/t15
title: "Figure 21" of "Systematic Studies of Elliptic Flow Measurements in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV"

description: Anisotropy parameter $v_2$ as a function of pseudorapidity within the PHENIX central arms using event planes from the BBC and ZDC-SMD, and from the two-particle cumulant method for centrality 20–40%. The results are shown for three $p_T$ bins, which are from top to bottom: 2.0–3.0, 1.2–1.4 and 0.6–0.8 GeV/$c$.
description: We present inclusive charged hadron elliptic flow ($v_2$) measured over the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|$ &lt; 0.35 in Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Results for $v_2$ are presented over a broad range of transverse momentum ($p_{T}$ = 0.2-8.0 GeV/$c$) and centrality (0-60%). To study nonflow effects that are correlations other than collective flow, as well as the fluctuations of $v_2$, we compare two different analysis methods: (1) the event-plane method from two independent subdetectors at forward ($|\eta|$ = 3.1–3.9) and beam ($|\eta|$ &gt; 6.5) pseudorapidities and (2) the two-particle cumulant method extracted using correlations between particles detected at midrapidity. The two event-plane results are consistent within systematic uncertainties over the measured $p_T$ and in centrality 0–40%. There is at most a 20% difference in the $v_2$ between the two event-plane methods in peripheral (40–60%) collisions. The comparisons between the two-particle cumulant results and the standard event-plane measurements are discussed.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.143606.v1/t16
title: "Figure 22" of "Systematic Studies of Elliptic Flow Measurements in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV"

description: Comparison of the $v_2${BBC} and $v_2${ZDC-SMD} obtained from the S-N and ZDC-BBC-CNT subevents as a function of pT in the 20–60% centrality range.
description: We present inclusive charged hadron elliptic flow ($v_2$) measured over the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|$ &lt; 0.35 in Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Results for $v_2$ are presented over a broad range of transverse momentum ($p_{T}$ = 0.2-8.0 GeV/$c$) and centrality (0-60%). To study nonflow effects that are correlations other than collective flow, as well as the fluctuations of $v_2$, we compare two different analysis methods: (1) the event-plane method from two independent subdetectors at forward ($|\eta|$ = 3.1–3.9) and beam ($|\eta|$ &gt; 6.5) pseudorapidities and (2) the two-particle cumulant method extracted using correlations between particles detected at midrapidity. The two event-plane results are consistent within systematic uncertainties over the measured $p_T$ and in centrality 0–40%. There is at most a 20% difference in the $v_2$ between the two event-plane methods in peripheral (40–60%) collisions. The comparisons between the two-particle cumulant results and the standard event-plane measurements are discussed.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.143606.v1/t17
title: "Figure 23" of "Systematic Studies of Elliptic Flow Measurements in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV"

description: Charged hadron $v_2${2} for the PHENIX experiment as a function of $p_T$ in centrality 20–60%.
description: We present inclusive charged hadron elliptic flow ($v_2$) measured over the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|$ &lt; 0.35 in Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Results for $v_2$ are presented over a broad range of transverse momentum ($p_{T}$ = 0.2-8.0 GeV/$c$) and centrality (0-60%). To study nonflow effects that are correlations other than collective flow, as well as the fluctuations of $v_2$, we compare two different analysis methods: (1) the event-plane method from two independent subdetectors at forward ($|\eta|$ = 3.1–3.9) and beam ($|\eta|$ &gt; 6.5) pseudorapidities and (2) the two-particle cumulant method extracted using correlations between particles detected at midrapidity. The two event-plane results are consistent within systematic uncertainties over the measured $p_T$ and in centrality 0–40%. There is at most a 20% difference in the $v_2$ between the two event-plane methods in peripheral (40–60%) collisions. The comparisons between the two-particle cumulant results and the standard event-plane measurements are discussed.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.143606.v1/t18
title: "Figure 24a-1" of "Systematic Studies of Elliptic Flow Measurements in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV"

description: The PHENIX $v_2${BBC} and $v_2${ZDC-SMD} from the modified event-plane method for charged hadrons as a function of $p_T$ in different centralities.
description: We present inclusive charged hadron elliptic flow ($v_2$) measured over the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|$ &lt; 0.35 in Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Results for $v_2$ are presented over a broad range of transverse momentum ($p_{T}$ = 0.2-8.0 GeV/$c$) and centrality (0-60%). To study nonflow effects that are correlations other than collective flow, as well as the fluctuations of $v_2$, we compare two different analysis methods: (1) the event-plane method from two independent subdetectors at forward ($|\eta|$ = 3.1–3.9) and beam ($|\eta|$ &gt; 6.5) pseudorapidities and (2) the two-particle cumulant method extracted using correlations between particles detected at midrapidity. The two event-plane results are consistent within systematic uncertainties over the measured $p_T$ and in centrality 0–40%. There is at most a 20% difference in the $v_2$ between the two event-plane methods in peripheral (40–60%) collisions. The comparisons between the two-particle cumulant results and the standard event-plane measurements are discussed.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.143606.v1/t19
title: "Figure 24a-2" of "Systematic Studies of Elliptic Flow Measurements in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV"

description: The PHENIX $v_2${BBC} and $v_2${ZDC-SMD} from the modified event-plane method for charged hadrons as a function of $p_T$ in different centralities.
description: We present inclusive charged hadron elliptic flow ($v_2$) measured over the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|$ &lt; 0.35 in Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Results for $v_2$ are presented over a broad range of transverse momentum ($p_{T}$ = 0.2-8.0 GeV/$c$) and centrality (0-60%). To study nonflow effects that are correlations other than collective flow, as well as the fluctuations of $v_2$, we compare two different analysis methods: (1) the event-plane method from two independent subdetectors at forward ($|\eta|$ = 3.1–3.9) and beam ($|\eta|$ &gt; 6.5) pseudorapidities and (2) the two-particle cumulant method extracted using correlations between particles detected at midrapidity. The two event-plane results are consistent within systematic uncertainties over the measured $p_T$ and in centrality 0–40%. There is at most a 20% difference in the $v_2$ between the two event-plane methods in peripheral (40–60%) collisions. The comparisons between the two-particle cumulant results and the standard event-plane measurements are discussed.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.143606.v1/t20
title: "Figure 24a-3" of "Systematic Studies of Elliptic Flow Measurements in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV"

description: The PHENIX $v_2${BBC} and $v_2${ZDC-SMD} from the modified event-plane method for charged hadrons as a function of $p_T$ in different centralities.
description: We present inclusive charged hadron elliptic flow ($v_2$) measured over the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|$ &lt; 0.35 in Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Results for $v_2$ are presented over a broad range of transverse momentum ($p_{T}$ = 0.2-8.0 GeV/$c$) and centrality (0-60%). To study nonflow effects that are correlations other than collective flow, as well as the fluctuations of $v_2$, we compare two different analysis methods: (1) the event-plane method from two independent subdetectors at forward ($|\eta|$ = 3.1–3.9) and beam ($|\eta|$ &gt; 6.5) pseudorapidities and (2) the two-particle cumulant method extracted using correlations between particles detected at midrapidity. The two event-plane results are consistent within systematic uncertainties over the measured $p_T$ and in centrality 0–40%. There is at most a 20% difference in the $v_2$ between the two event-plane methods in peripheral (40–60%) collisions. The comparisons between the two-particle cumulant results and the standard event-plane measurements are discussed.
DOI: 10.17182/hepdata.143606.v1/t21
title: "Figure 24b-1" of "Systematic Studies of Elliptic Flow Measurements in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV"

description: The PHENIX $v_2${BBC} and $v_2${ZDC-SMD} from the modified event-plane method for charged hadrons as a function of $p_T$ in different centralities.
description: We present inclusive charged hadron elliptic flow ($v_2$) measured over the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|$ &lt; 0.35 in Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Results for $v_2$ are presented over a broad range of transverse momentum ($p_{T}$ = 0.2-8.0 GeV/$c$) and centrality (0-60%). To study nonflow effects that are correlations other than collective flow, as well as the fluctuations of $v_2$, we compare two different analysis methods: (1) the event-plane method from two independent subdetectors at forward ($|\eta|$ = 3.1–3.9) and beam ($|\eta|$ &gt; 6.5) pseudorapidities and (2) the two-particle cumulant method extracted using correlations between particles detected at midrapidity. The two event-plane results are consistent within systematic uncertainties over the measured $p_T$ and in centrality 0–40%. There is at most a 20% difference in the $v_2$ between the two event-plane methods in peripheral (40–60%) collisions. The comparisons between the two-particle cumulant results and the standard event-plane measurements are discussed.