cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10556149
title: On the Different Abilities of Cross-Sample Entropy and K-Nearest-Neighbor Cross-Unpredictability in Assessing Dynamic Cardiorespiratory and Cerebrovascular Interactions

description: Porta A, Bari V, Gelpi F, Cairo B, De Maria B, Tonon D, Rossato G, Faes L. On the Different Abilities of Cross-Sample Entropy and K-Nearest-Neighbor Cross-Unpredictability in Assessing Dynamic Cardiorespiratory and Cerebrovascular Interactions. Entropy (Basel). 2023 Apr 1;25(4):599. doi: 10.3390/e25040599. PMID: 37190390; PMCID: PMC10137562.

Abstract



Nonlinear markers of coupling strength are often utilized to typify cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular regulations. The computation of these indices requires techniques describing nonlinear interactions between respiration (R) and heart period (HP) and between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and mean cerebral blood velocity (MCBv). We compared two model-free methods for the assessment of dynamic HP-R and MCBv-MAP interactions, namely the cross-sample entropy (CSampEn) and k-nearest-neighbor cross-unpredictability (KNNCUP). Comparison was carried out first over simulations generated by linear and nonlinear unidirectional causal, bidirectional linear causal, and lag-zero linear noncausal models, and then over experimental data acquired from 19 subjects at supine rest during spontaneous breathing and controlled respiration at 10, 15, and 20 breaths·minute-1 as well as from 13 subjects at supine rest and during 60° head-up tilt. Linear markers were computed for comparison. We found that: (i) over simulations, CSampEn and KNNCUP exhibit different abilities in evaluating coupling strength; (ii) KNNCUP is more reliable than CSampEn when interactions occur according to a causal structure, while performances are similar in noncausal models; (iii) in healthy subjects, KNNCUP is more powerful in characterizing cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular variability interactions than CSampEn and linear markers. We recommend KNNCUP for quantifying cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular coupling.
DOI: 10.21942/uva.24829896.v6
title: Elucidating the role of water in collagen self assembly by isotopically modulating collagen hydration

description: This zip file contains data, and analysis for the paper.
DOI: 10.21942/uva.24994439
title: Data repository for: Soft X-Ray Absorption and Fragmentation of Tin-oxo Cage Photoresists

description: This dataset contains materials for the publication:
Soft X-Ray Absorption and Fragmentation of Tin-oxo Cage Photoresists
by
Jarich Haitjema, Sonia Castellanos, Olivier Lugier, Ivan Bespalov, Rebecka Lindblad, Martin Timm, Christine Bülow, Vicente Zamudio-Bayer, J. Tobias Lau, Bernd von Issendorff, Ronnie Hoekstra, Katharina Witte, Benjamin Watts, Thomas Schlathölter, Albert M. Brouwer
<br>
PhysChemChemPhys 2024
doi:10.1039/D3CP05428D
<br>
The data are organized according to the figures in the main text and in the Supporting Information.
DOI: 10.21942/uva.24994439.v1
title: Data repository for: Soft X-Ray Absorption and Fragmentation of Tin-oxo Cage Photoresists

description: This dataset contains materials for the publication:
Soft X-Ray Absorption and Fragmentation of Tin-oxo Cage Photoresists
by
Jarich Haitjema, Sonia Castellanos, Olivier Lugier, Ivan Bespalov, Rebecka Lindblad, Martin Timm, Christine Bülow, Vicente Zamudio-Bayer, J. Tobias Lau, Bernd von Issendorff, Ronnie Hoekstra, Katharina Witte, Benjamin Watts, Thomas Schlathölter, Albert M. Brouwer
<br>
PhysChemChemPhys 2024
doi:10.1039/D3CP05428D
<br>
The data are organized according to the figures in the main text and in the Supporting Information.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10554768
title: Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale-Version 2 A Stepwise Validation with Three Cross-Sectional Data Collections

description: Magon A, Conte G, Dellafiore F, Arrigoni C, Baroni I, Brera AS, Avenido J, De Maria M, Stievano A, Villa G, Caruso R. Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale-Version 2: A Stepwise Validation with Three Cross-Sectional Data Collections. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 3;11(5):754. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050754. PMID: 36900758; PMCID: PMC10001547.

Abstract



Background: The nursing professional self-efficacy scale (NPSES) is one of the most used self-reporting tools for assessing nursing self-efficacy. Its psychometric structure was described differently in several national contexts. This study aimed to develop and validate version 2 of the NPSES (NPSES2), which is a brief version of the original scale selecting items that contribute to stably detecting attributes of care delivery and professionalism as descriptors of salient aspects of the nursing profession.

Methods: Three different and subsequent cross-sectional data collections were employed to reduce the number of items to generate the NPSES2 and validate its new emerging dimensionality. The first (June 2019-January 2020) involved 550 nurses and was used to reduce the number of the original scale items by using a Mokken scale analysis (MSA) to ensure the selection of items consistently with the invariant item ordering properties. The subsequent data collection was performed to conduct an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) involving 309 nurses (September 2020-January 2021), and the last data collection (n = 249) was performed to cross-validate with a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the most plausible dimensionality derived from the EFA (June 2021-February 2022).

Results: The MSA led to the removal of twelve items and retention of seven items (Hs = 0.407, standard error = 0.023), which showed adequate reliability (rho reliability = 0.817). The EFA showed a two-factor solution as the most plausible structure (factors loading ranged from 0.673 to 0.903; explained variance = 38.2%), which was cross-validated by the CFA that showed adequate fit indices: χ2 (13, N = 249) = 44.521, p < 0.001; CFI = 0.946; TLI = 0.912; RMSEA = 0.069 (90% CI = 0.048-0.084); SRMR = 0.041. The factors were labeled as care delivery (four items) and professionalism (three items).

Conclusions: NPSES2 is recommended to allow researchers and educators to assess nursing self-efficacy and inform interventions and policies.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10554769
title: Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale-Version 2 A Stepwise Validation with Three Cross-Sectional Data Collections

description: Magon A, Conte G, Dellafiore F, Arrigoni C, Baroni I, Brera AS, Avenido J, De Maria M, Stievano A, Villa G, Caruso R. Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale-Version 2: A Stepwise Validation with Three Cross-Sectional Data Collections. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 3;11(5):754. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050754. PMID: 36900758; PMCID: PMC10001547.

Abstract



Background: The nursing professional self-efficacy scale (NPSES) is one of the most used self-reporting tools for assessing nursing self-efficacy. Its psychometric structure was described differently in several national contexts. This study aimed to develop and validate version 2 of the NPSES (NPSES2), which is a brief version of the original scale selecting items that contribute to stably detecting attributes of care delivery and professionalism as descriptors of salient aspects of the nursing profession.

Methods: Three different and subsequent cross-sectional data collections were employed to reduce the number of items to generate the NPSES2 and validate its new emerging dimensionality. The first (June 2019-January 2020) involved 550 nurses and was used to reduce the number of the original scale items by using a Mokken scale analysis (MSA) to ensure the selection of items consistently with the invariant item ordering properties. The subsequent data collection was performed to conduct an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) involving 309 nurses (September 2020-January 2021), and the last data collection (n = 249) was performed to cross-validate with a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the most plausible dimensionality derived from the EFA (June 2021-February 2022).

Results: The MSA led to the removal of twelve items and retention of seven items (Hs = 0.407, standard error = 0.023), which showed adequate reliability (rho reliability = 0.817). The EFA showed a two-factor solution as the most plausible structure (factors loading ranged from 0.673 to 0.903; explained variance = 38.2%), which was cross-validated by the CFA that showed adequate fit indices: χ2 (13, N = 249) = 44.521, p < 0.001; CFI = 0.946; TLI = 0.912; RMSEA = 0.069 (90% CI = 0.048-0.084); SRMR = 0.041. The factors were labeled as care delivery (four items) and professionalism (three items).

Conclusions: NPSES2 is recommended to allow researchers and educators to assess nursing self-efficacy and inform interventions and policies.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25013786
title: ISX 220928 Run files

description: Peripheral human neutrophils were isolated as above and pretreated with 50 μg/mL of purified human THP, sialic acid (500 ng/mL, catalog no. A0812, Sigma Aldrich), or mock-treated, and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 30 min, and then incubated for an additional 2.5 h with PMA (25 nM). The following antibodies (0.5 μg/mL) and dyes (concentrations provided below) were added: Anti-MPO-FITC (clone M1/70, catalog no. 553310; BD Biosciences), Fc Block, Live/Dead Near IR (1:200 of stock, catalog no. L34975; Thermo Fisher Scientific), Sytox orange (100 nM, catalog no. S34861; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and Hoechst 33342 (200 nM, catalog no. 62249; Thermo Fisher Scientific). After a 30-minute incubation on ice, samples were washed 1X, resuspended in a 1:1 mixture of fresh FACS buffer and PBS. Cell morphology via imaging flow cytometry was assessed as described previously (PMID: 30985081). An Amnis ImageStream X Mark II imaging flow cytometer was used for data acquisition with a 60X objective, low flow rate and high sensitivity, and 405, 488, 561 and 635 nm lasers set to 120, 150, 100 and 150 mW respectively. Data were analyzed using the IDEAS version 6.3 software package. Clipped images were retained due to the large size of NETs, and single stained controls were used for compensation. Masking was performed using the default “object (tight)” and “morphology” algorithms as described (PMID: 30985081). Statistics reports were generated using IDEAS and processed IDEAS data analysis files (.daf) were then analyzed in FCS Express 7 to generate analysis plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25013774
title: ISX 221010 Run Files

description: Peripheral human neutrophils were isolated as above and pretreated with 50 μg/mL of purified human THP, sialic acid (500 ng/mL, catalog no. A0812, Sigma Aldrich), or mock-treated, and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 30 min, and then incubated for an additional 2.5 h with PMA (25 nM). The following antibodies (0.5 μg/mL) and dyes (concentrations provided below) were added: Anti-MPO-FITC (clone M1/70, catalog no. 553310; BD Biosciences), Fc Block, Live/Dead Near IR (1:200 of stock, catalog no. L34975; Thermo Fisher Scientific), Sytox orange (100 nM, catalog no. S34861; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and Hoechst 33342 (200 nM, catalog no. 62249; Thermo Fisher Scientific). After a 30-minute incubation on ice, samples were washed 1X, resuspended in a 1:1 mixture of fresh FACS buffer and PBS. Cell morphology via imaging flow cytometry was assessed as described previously (PMID: 30985081). An Amnis ImageStream X Mark II imaging flow cytometer was used for data acquisition with a 60X objective, low flow rate and high sensitivity, and 405, 488, 561 and 635 nm lasers set to 120, 150, 100 and 150 mW respectively. Data were analyzed using the IDEAS version 6.3 software package. Clipped images were retained due to the large size of NETs, and single stained controls were used for compensation. Masking was performed using the default “object (tight)” and “morphology” algorithms as described (PMID: 30985081). Statistics reports were generated using IDEAS and processed IDEAS data analysis files (.daf) were then analyzed in FCS Express 7 to generate analysis plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25013774.v1
title: ISX 221010 Run Files

description: Peripheral human neutrophils were isolated as above and pretreated with 50 μg/mL of purified human THP, sialic acid (500 ng/mL, catalog no. A0812, Sigma Aldrich), or mock-treated, and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 30 min, and then incubated for an additional 2.5 h with PMA (25 nM). The following antibodies (0.5 μg/mL) and dyes (concentrations provided below) were added: Anti-MPO-FITC (clone M1/70, catalog no. 553310; BD Biosciences), Fc Block, Live/Dead Near IR (1:200 of stock, catalog no. L34975; Thermo Fisher Scientific), Sytox orange (100 nM, catalog no. S34861; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and Hoechst 33342 (200 nM, catalog no. 62249; Thermo Fisher Scientific). After a 30-minute incubation on ice, samples were washed 1X, resuspended in a 1:1 mixture of fresh FACS buffer and PBS. Cell morphology via imaging flow cytometry was assessed as described previously (PMID: 30985081). An Amnis ImageStream X Mark II imaging flow cytometer was used for data acquisition with a 60X objective, low flow rate and high sensitivity, and 405, 488, 561 and 635 nm lasers set to 120, 150, 100 and 150 mW respectively. Data were analyzed using the IDEAS version 6.3 software package. Clipped images were retained due to the large size of NETs, and single stained controls were used for compensation. Masking was performed using the default “object (tight)” and “morphology” algorithms as described (PMID: 30985081). Statistics reports were generated using IDEAS and processed IDEAS data analysis files (.daf) were then analyzed in FCS Express 7 to generate analysis plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25013744
title: ISX 221128 Run Files

description: Peripheral human neutrophils were isolated as above and pretreated with 50 μg/mL of purified human THP, sialic acid (500 ng/mL, catalog no. A0812, Sigma Aldrich), or mock-treated, and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 30 min, and then incubated for an additional 2.5 h with PMA (25 nM). The following antibodies (0.5 μg/mL) and dyes (concentrations provided below) were added: Anti-MPO-FITC (clone M1/70, catalog no. 553310; BD Biosciences), Fc Block, Live/Dead Near IR (1:200 of stock, catalog no. L34975; Thermo Fisher Scientific), Sytox orange (100 nM, catalog no. S34861; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and Hoechst 33342 (200 nM, catalog no. 62249; Thermo Fisher Scientific). After a 30-minute incubation on ice, samples were washed 1X, resuspended in a 1:1 mixture of fresh FACS buffer and PBS. Cell morphology via imaging flow cytometry was assessed as described previously (PMID: 30985081). An Amnis ImageStream X Mark II imaging flow cytometer was used for data acquisition with a 60X objective, low flow rate and high sensitivity, and 405, 488, 561 and 635 nm lasers set to 120, 150, 100 and 150 mW respectively. Data were analyzed using the IDEAS version 6.3 software package. Clipped images were retained due to the large size of NETs, and single stained controls were used for compensation. Masking was performed using the default “object (tight)” and “morphology” algorithms as described (PMID: 30985081). Statistics reports were generated using IDEAS and processed IDEAS data analysis files (.daf) were then analyzed in FCS Express 7 to generate analysis plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25013744.v1
title: ISX 221128 Run Files

description: Peripheral human neutrophils were isolated as above and pretreated with 50 μg/mL of purified human THP, sialic acid (500 ng/mL, catalog no. A0812, Sigma Aldrich), or mock-treated, and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 30 min, and then incubated for an additional 2.5 h with PMA (25 nM). The following antibodies (0.5 μg/mL) and dyes (concentrations provided below) were added: Anti-MPO-FITC (clone M1/70, catalog no. 553310; BD Biosciences), Fc Block, Live/Dead Near IR (1:200 of stock, catalog no. L34975; Thermo Fisher Scientific), Sytox orange (100 nM, catalog no. S34861; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and Hoechst 33342 (200 nM, catalog no. 62249; Thermo Fisher Scientific). After a 30-minute incubation on ice, samples were washed 1X, resuspended in a 1:1 mixture of fresh FACS buffer and PBS. Cell morphology via imaging flow cytometry was assessed as described previously (PMID: 30985081). An Amnis ImageStream X Mark II imaging flow cytometer was used for data acquisition with a 60X objective, low flow rate and high sensitivity, and 405, 488, 561 and 635 nm lasers set to 120, 150, 100 and 150 mW respectively. Data were analyzed using the IDEAS version 6.3 software package. Clipped images were retained due to the large size of NETs, and single stained controls were used for compensation. Masking was performed using the default “object (tight)” and “morphology” algorithms as described (PMID: 30985081). Statistics reports were generated using IDEAS and processed IDEAS data analysis files (.daf) were then analyzed in FCS Express 7 to generate analysis plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25013651
title: ISX 221031 run files

description: Peripheral human neutrophils were isolated as above and pretreated with 50 μg/mL of purified human THP, sialic acid (500 ng/mL, catalog no. A0812, Sigma Aldrich), or mock-treated, and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 30 min, and then incubated for an additional 2.5 h with PMA (25 nM). The following antibodies (0.5 μg/mL) and dyes (concentrations provided below) were added: Anti-MPO-FITC (clone M1/70, catalog no. 553310; BD Biosciences), Fc Block, Live/Dead Near IR (1:200 of stock, catalog no. L34975; Thermo Fisher Scientific), Sytox orange (100 nM, catalog no. S34861; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and Hoechst 33342 (200 nM, catalog no. 62249; Thermo Fisher Scientific). After a 30-minute incubation on ice, samples were washed 1X, resuspended in a 1:1 mixture of fresh FACS buffer and PBS. Cell morphology via imaging flow cytometry was assessed as described previously (PMID: 30985081). An Amnis ImageStream X Mark II imaging flow cytometer was used for data acquisition with a 60X objective, low flow rate and high sensitivity, and 405, 488, 561 and 635 nm lasers set to 120, 150, 100 and 150 mW respectively. Data were analyzed using the IDEAS version 6.3 software package. Clipped images were retained due to the large size of NETs, and single stained controls were used for compensation. Masking was performed using the default “object (tight)” and “morphology” algorithms as described (PMID: 30985081). Statistics reports were generated using IDEAS and processed IDEAS data analysis files (.daf) were then analyzed in FCS Express 7 to generate analysis plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25013651.v1
title: ISX 221031 run files

description: Peripheral human neutrophils were isolated as above and pretreated with 50 μg/mL of purified human THP, sialic acid (500 ng/mL, catalog no. A0812, Sigma Aldrich), or mock-treated, and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 30 min, and then incubated for an additional 2.5 h with PMA (25 nM). The following antibodies (0.5 μg/mL) and dyes (concentrations provided below) were added: Anti-MPO-FITC (clone M1/70, catalog no. 553310; BD Biosciences), Fc Block, Live/Dead Near IR (1:200 of stock, catalog no. L34975; Thermo Fisher Scientific), Sytox orange (100 nM, catalog no. S34861; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and Hoechst 33342 (200 nM, catalog no. 62249; Thermo Fisher Scientific). After a 30-minute incubation on ice, samples were washed 1X, resuspended in a 1:1 mixture of fresh FACS buffer and PBS. Cell morphology via imaging flow cytometry was assessed as described previously (PMID: 30985081). An Amnis ImageStream X Mark II imaging flow cytometer was used for data acquisition with a 60X objective, low flow rate and high sensitivity, and 405, 488, 561 and 635 nm lasers set to 120, 150, 100 and 150 mW respectively. Data were analyzed using the IDEAS version 6.3 software package. Clipped images were retained due to the large size of NETs, and single stained controls were used for compensation. Masking was performed using the default “object (tight)” and “morphology” algorithms as described (PMID: 30985081). Statistics reports were generated using IDEAS and processed IDEAS data analysis files (.daf) were then analyzed in FCS Express 7 to generate analysis plots.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10554709
title: A Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial to Test the Efficacy of Nurse-Led Motivational Interviewing for Enhancing Self-Care in Adults with Heart Failure

description: Dellafiore F, Ghizzardi G, Vellone E, Magon A, Conte G, Baroni I, De Angeli G, Vangone I, Russo S, Stievano A, Arrigoni C, Caruso R. A Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial to Test the Efficacy of Nurse-Led Motivational Interviewing for Enhancing Self-Care in Adults with Heart Failure. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 6;11(5):773. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050773. PMID: 36900778; PMCID: PMC10000833.

Abstract



Background: The role of nurse-led motivational interviewing (MI) in improving self-care among patients with heart failure (HF) is promising, even if it still requires further empirical evidence to determine its efficacy. For this reason, this study tested its efficacy in enhancing self-care maintenance (primary endpoint), self-care management, and self-care confidence after three months from enrollment in adults with HF compared to usual care, and assessed changes in self-care over follow-up times (3, 6, 9, and 12 months).

Methods: A single-center, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, superiority study with two experimental arms and a control group was performed. Allocation was in a 1:1:1 ratio between intervention groups and control.

Results: MI was effective in improving self-care maintenance after three months when it was performed only for patients (arm 1) and for the patients-caregivers dyad (arm 2) (respectively, Cohen's d = 0.92, p-value < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.68, p-value < 0.001). These effects were stable over the one-year follow-up. No effects were observed concerning self-care management, while MI moderately influenced self-care confidence.

Conclusions: This study supported the adoption of nurse-led MI in the clinical management of adults with HF.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10554710
title: A Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial to Test the Efficacy of Nurse-Led Motivational Interviewing for Enhancing Self-Care in Adults with Heart Failure

description: Dellafiore F, Ghizzardi G, Vellone E, Magon A, Conte G, Baroni I, De Angeli G, Vangone I, Russo S, Stievano A, Arrigoni C, Caruso R. A Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial to Test the Efficacy of Nurse-Led Motivational Interviewing for Enhancing Self-Care in Adults with Heart Failure. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 6;11(5):773. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050773. PMID: 36900778; PMCID: PMC10000833.

Abstract



Background: The role of nurse-led motivational interviewing (MI) in improving self-care among patients with heart failure (HF) is promising, even if it still requires further empirical evidence to determine its efficacy. For this reason, this study tested its efficacy in enhancing self-care maintenance (primary endpoint), self-care management, and self-care confidence after three months from enrollment in adults with HF compared to usual care, and assessed changes in self-care over follow-up times (3, 6, 9, and 12 months).

Methods: A single-center, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, superiority study with two experimental arms and a control group was performed. Allocation was in a 1:1:1 ratio between intervention groups and control.

Results: MI was effective in improving self-care maintenance after three months when it was performed only for patients (arm 1) and for the patients-caregivers dyad (arm 2) (respectively, Cohen's d = 0.92, p-value < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.68, p-value < 0.001). These effects were stable over the one-year follow-up. No effects were observed concerning self-care management, while MI moderately influenced self-care confidence.

Conclusions: This study supported the adoption of nurse-led MI in the clinical management of adults with HF.
DOI: 10.25345/c5q23rb1x
title: MassIVE MSV000093927 - Mara1 Heterologous expression in S. albidoflavus
title: Heterologous expression of Mara1 in S. ablidoflavus J1074. Mara1 is from S. mirabilis P8-A2