cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxzb
title: Summaries of and City Attorney recommendations for settlement cases (1-4 of 4), 1983 Dec. 19 - 1990 Dec. 11

description: Summaries of and City Attorney Recommendation for settlement cases (1-4 of 4), 1983 December 19 - 1990 December 11. PART OF A SERIES: Latham & Watkins researched a total of 83 civil litigation cases brought against the LAPD pertaining to excessive force and/or improper tactics to ascertain whether the Rodney King incident was in fact the aberration that Chief Daryl Gates described. Included in the series are several materials related to the firm’s investigation and final work product. Specifically, the series contains source materials related to the 83 cases that were studied. These materials include the firm’s own memoranda and notes, statistics on misconduct and police brutality, summaries of the selected cases, recommendations for settlement drafted by the Office of the City Attorney, docket cards, copies of settlement agreements, a master roster of officers named in the civil suits, and excerpts from officers’ personnel files. Also included are summaries of interviews held with police personnel and aggrieved citizens about their perception of problems within the LAPD.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kz94
title: 6.11. IC on LAPD / general counsel witness - Moore, Mark, 1988 Nov. - 1991 June 10

description: 6.11. Independent Commission on Los Angeles Police Department / general counsel witness - Moore, Mark, 1988 November - 1991 June 10. Interview with Mark Moore, article written by Mark Moore, testimony of Moore, Moore's research studies on police reform. PART OF A SERIES: The series pertains to the work of Munger, Tolles & Olson, the firm responsible for coordinating the activities and proceedings of the Independent Commission's legal counsel. Included are legal briefs, court transcripts, and memoranda; press releases and article clippings about the Rodney King incident and the subsequent creation of the Independent Commission; summaries of witness interviews; analyses of legislation regarding the role and purview of peace officers; work plans and outlines developed by Commission staff; draft copies developed for all sections of the Commission report; supplemental materials for the report, including a copy of the Rodney King arrest log, law enforcement literature, and public opinion surveys; materials distributed and reviewed during Commission meetings; letters of interest submitted to Chairman Christopher from prospective Commission members and organizations; and lists of bills and Commission expenditures.1. LaMothe, memo, 1991-04-22, re Interview with Mark Moore 4/11/912. The gulf between 'them' and 'us', 1991-04-053. LaMothe, memo, 1991-06-05, re Testimony of Prof. Mark Moore4. Moore, memo, [s.d.], re Some ideas about reform5. Perspectives on policing, no. 9 (1988-11)6. Perspectives on policing, no. 12 (1989-09)7. LaMothe, memo, 1991-05-06, re Interview with Mark Moore 4/11/918. The gulf between 'them' and 'us', 1991-04-059. Boston, memo, 1991-06-10, to Spiegel10. Moore, memo, [s.d.], re Some ideas about reform11. Irell & Manella, memo, 1991-04-19, re Interview with David Kennedy12. Irell & Manella, memo, 1991-04-18, re Interview with Mark Moore13. Irell & Manella, memo, 1991-04-18, re Interview with George Kelling14. LaMothe, fax, 1991-04-24, to Spiegel15. LaMothe, letter, 1991-04-23, to Moore16. LaMothe, memo, 1991-04-24, to Spiegel17. Hartmann, memo, 1991-04-17, to Kelling18. Irell & Manella, action agenda, 1991-0419. The policing crisis in America, 1991-04-1620. Police chiefs call for U.S. to study use of force, 1991-04-17
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxxs
title: Independent Commission memoranda, 1991 Apr. 20 - June 20

description: Independent Commission memoranda, 1991 April 20 - June 20. Miscellaneous correspondance, memos, etc. PART OF A SERIES: Latham & Watkins researched a total of 83 civil litigation cases brought against the LAPD pertaining to excessive force and/or improper tactics to ascertain whether the Rodney King incident was in fact the aberration that Chief Daryl Gates described. Included in the series are several materials related to the firm’s investigation and final work product. Specifically, the series contains source materials related to the 83 cases that were studied. These materials include the firm’s own memoranda and notes, statistics on misconduct and police brutality, summaries of the selected cases, recommendations for settlement drafted by the Office of the City Attorney, docket cards, copies of settlement agreements, a master roster of officers named in the civil suits, and excerpts from officers’ personnel files. Also included are summaries of interviews held with police personnel and aggrieved citizens about their perception of problems within the LAPD.1. Meinicke, memo, 1991-06-03, to Spiegel2. Meinicke, fax, 1991-06-03, to Spiegel3. Sherrell, memo, 1991-04-20, re 4/19/91 interview with City Attorney's Office4. Chaplick, letter, 1991-04-25, to Hokinson5. Sherrell, memo, 1991-04-26, re City Attorneys files - Civil litigation6. Conway, memo, 1991-04-29, re Map of LAPD precincts7. Richards, memo, 1991-05-01, to Getto8. Richards, memo, 1991-05-01, to Getto9. Thomas, letter, 1991-04-30, to Richards10. Chaplick, memo, 1991-05-15, to Spiegel11. Chaplick, memo, 1991-05-15, to Spiegel12. Chaplick, memo, 1991-05-28, to Sherrell13. Chaplick, memo, 1991-05-28, to Sherrell14. Christopher, memo, 1991-06-07, to Spiegel15. Saunders, memo, 1991-06-20, to Huebner
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kz3f
title: 6.7. IC on LAPD / general counsel witness - West, Louis J., 1990 Oct. - 1991 July 17

description: 6.7. Independent Commission on Los Angeles Police Department / general counsel witness - West, Louis J., 1990 Oct. - 1991 July 17. Interview with Doctor Louis Jolyon West, "Unwonted violence by police officers" - a report to the Christopher Commission by Louise Jolyon West, handwritten notes, West's biography, etc.. PART OF A SERIES: The series pertains to the work of Munger, Tolles & Olson, the firm responsible for coordinating the activities and proceedings of the Independent Commission's legal counsel. Included are legal briefs, court transcripts, and memoranda; press releases and article clippings about the Rodney King incident and the subsequent creation of the Independent Commission; summaries of witness interviews; analyses of legislation regarding the role and purview of peace officers; work plans and outlines developed by Commission staff; draft copies developed for all sections of the Commission report; supplemental materials for the report, including a copy of the Rodney King arrest log, law enforcement literature, and public opinion surveys; materials distributed and reviewed during Commission meetings; letters of interest submitted to Chairman Christopher from prospective Commission members and organizations; and lists of bills and Commission expenditures.1. Berkowitz, memo, 1991-05-01, re April 30, 1991 interview with Dr. Louis Jolyon West…2. Berkowitz, letter, 1991-07-17, to Spiegel3. Unwonted violence by police officers, 1991-05 [p. 1 only]4. Berkowitz, letter, 1991-07-17, to Spiegel5. Unwonted violence by police officers, 1991-05 [p. 1 only]6. Unwonted violence by police officers, 1991-057. West testimony notes, 1991-04-238. West biographical sketch, 19909. West biographical sketch, 1990-1010. West biographical sketch, 1990-199111. West résume, 1991-0112. Pasek, memo, 1991-04-25, to Spiegel13. Pasek, memo, 1991-04-25, re Summary points from presentation of Dr. Louis Jolyon West14. West notes, 1991-04-2615. Berkowitz, memo, 1991-05-01, re April 30, 1991 interview with Dr. Louis Jolyon West…16. Pasek, memo, 1991-04-25, re Summary points from presentation of Dr. Louis Jolyon West
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxxi
title: Gale, memo, 1991-06-25, re Montaño interview

description: Todd Gale (Kirkland & Ellis), memorandum, 1991 June 25, to File - Christopher Commission, re Interview with Eleanor R. Montaño. Memoranda Interviews - Montaño, Eleanor R.. PART OF A SERIES: Kirkland & Ellis provided general assistance to the Independent Commission over the course of its investigation, and also researched the merits and drawbacks associated with a community-oriented policing model. Included in the series are article clippings, reports, and other source materials related to community-oriented policing; interviews with personnel from the LAPD’s Harbor Division, where a community-oriented model was tested; and interviews with personnel from other LAPD divisions about their perceptions of departmental operations.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxw1
title: Documents: LA DA's Office materials, 1987 Dec. - 1990

description: Documents: LA DA's Office materials, 1987 December - 1990. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.1. Election violations official misconduct pamphlet, 1987-122. Special Investigations Division pamphlet, 1987-123. Felony / misdemeanor complaints (1989-1990), [1991?]4. Criminal justice II work flow, [s.d.]5. Livesay, résumé, [after 1979]6. District Attorney organizational chart, 1990-087. Bureau of Branch & Area Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]8. Bureau of Central Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]9. Bureau of Family Support Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]10. Bureau of Investigation organizational chart, [s.d.]11. Bureau of Management & Budget organizational chart, [s.d.]12. Bureau of Special Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]13. Media Relations Division organizational chart, [s.d.]14. Public Affairs Division organizational chart, [s.d.]
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxxg
title: Meyer, memo, 1991-06-32, re Hamilton & Hutton interviews

description: Charlie Meyer (Kirkland & Ellis), memorandum, 1991 June 21, to File - Christopher Commission, re Interview with LAPD Lead Officer Jeff Hamilton and LAPD detective Bob Hutton. Memoranda Interviews - Hamilton, Jeff and Bob Hutton. PART OF A SERIES: Kirkland & Ellis provided general assistance to the Independent Commission over the course of its investigation, and also researched the merits and drawbacks associated with a community-oriented policing model. Included in the series are article clippings, reports, and other source materials related to community-oriented policing; interviews with personnel from the LAPD’s Harbor Division, where a community-oriented model was tested; and interviews with personnel from other LAPD divisions about their perceptions of departmental operations.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxww
title: Documents: LA DA's Office materials, 1987 Dec. - 1990

description: Documents: LA DA's Office materials, 1987 December - 1990. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.1. Election violations official misconduct pamphlet, 1987-122. Special Investigations Division pamphlet, 1987-123. Felony / misdemeanor complaints (1989-1990), [1991?]4. Criminal justice II work flow, [s.d.]5. Livesay, résumé, [after 1979]6. District Attorney organizational chart, 1990-087. Bureau of Branch & Area Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]8. Bureau of Central Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]9. Bureau of Family Support Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]10. Bureau of Investigation organizational chart, [s.d.]11. Bureau of Management & Budget organizational chart, [s.d.]12. Bureau of Special Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]13. Media Relations Division organizational chart, [s.d.]14. Public Affairs Division organizational chart, [s.d.]
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxxf
title: Gale, memo, 1991-06-24, re DeLandurantey interview

description: Todd Gale (Kirland & Ellis), memorandum, 1991 June 24, to File - Christopher Commission, re Interview with LAPD Captain Joe DeLadurantey, Commander of the Harbor Division. Memoranda Interviews - DeLadurantey, Joe. PART OF A SERIES: Kirkland & Ellis provided general assistance to the Independent Commission over the course of its investigation, and also researched the merits and drawbacks associated with a community-oriented policing model. Included in the series are article clippings, reports, and other source materials related to community-oriented policing; interviews with personnel from the LAPD’s Harbor Division, where a community-oriented model was tested; and interviews with personnel from other LAPD divisions about their perceptions of departmental operations.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxwo
title: Source materials: Canine policy report, 1990-06-20

description: Source materials: Canine policy report, 1990 June 20. Memo - re: LAPD policies regarding the use of canines and review of the use of canines - from: Aaron S Dyer; to: Richard Drooyan and Jeffrey Dasteel. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxt4
title: Correspondence, vol. 3, 1991 June 2-30

description: Correspondence, vol. 3, 1991 June 2-30. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.1. Spiegel, memo, 1991-06-302. Holliday, fax, 1991-06-29, to Feess3. Feess, fax, 1991-06-29, to Epstein4. Spiegel, fax, 1991-06-28, to Feess5. Spiegel, memo, 1991-06-28, to Drooyan6. Feess, memo, 1991-06-28, to Spiegel7. Drooyan, fax, 1991-06-28, to Feess8. Holliday, memo, 1991-06-27, to Feess9. Holliday, fax, 1991-06-27, to Feess10. Holliday, fax, 1991-06-26, to Feess11. Feess, memo, 1991-06-26, to Spiegel12. Spiegel, fax, 1991-06-25, to Feess13. Selbst, memo, 1991-06-24, to Anderson14. Currey, fax, 1991-06-21, to Ray15. Steinberg, fax, 1991-06-21, to Spiegel16. Drooyan, fax, 1991-06-20, to Feess17. Spiegel, fax, 1991-06-20, to Feess18. Anderson, letter, 1991-06-20, to Feess19. Cincone, fax, 1991-06-19, to Feess20. Drooyan, fax, 1991-06-19, to Feess21. Holliday, memo, 1991-06-18, to Anderson22. Holliday, memo, 1991-06-18, to Spiegel23. Spiegel, fax, 1991-06-17, to Feess24. Spiegel, fax, 1991-06-17, to Feess25. Ray, memo, 1991-06-13, to Christopher26. Orozco, fax, 1991-06-12, to Feess27. Currey, fax, 1991-06-12, to Spiegel28. Kelley, fax, 1991-06-10, to Feess29. Feess, fax, 1991-06-09, to Drooyan30. McClelland, fax, 1991-06-07, to Feess31. Spiegel, fax, 1991-06-06, to Feess32. Steinberg, fax, 1991-06-05, to Feess33. Spiegel, fax, 1991-06-04, to Feess34. Gotlieb, fax, 1991-06-04, to Feess35. Feess, fax, 1991-06-03, to Drooyan36. Ray, fax, 1991-06-0337. Spiegel, memo, 1991-06-0338. Feess, fax, 1991-06-03, to Spiegel
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxtc
title: 11. Excerpt from a book on the history of the LAPD, [after 1982]

description: Excerpt (pp. 36-103) from an unidentified book on the history of the LAPD, [after 1982]. Witness file - Knecht Rita (2 of 2): Exhibit E - The Vigilante Era - historical piece on the roots of the LAPD. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxsw
title: Correspondence, vol. 1 (2 of 2), 1979 - 1990 Aug.

description: Correspondence, vol. 1 (2 of 2), 1979 - 1990 August. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.1. Livesay résumé, [after 1979]2. District Attorney organizational chart, 1990-083. Bureau of Branch & Area Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]4. Bureau of Central Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]5. Bureau of Family Support Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]6. Bureau of Investigation organizational chart, [s.d.]7. Bureau of Management & Budget organizational chart, [s.d.]8. Bureau of Special Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]9. Media Relations Division organizational chart, [s.d.]10. Public Affairs Division organizational chart, [s.d.]11. Felony / misdemeanor complaints (1989-1990), [1991?]12. Criminal justice II work flow, [s.d.]13. Prosecutor responsibilities introduction, 1985-0614. Prosecutor case investigation & evaluation, 1985-0615. Prosecutor supplementary case preparation request form, 1985-0616. Prosecutor corpus delicti evidence, 1985-0617. Prosecutor identity evidence, 1985-0618. Prosecutor conviction probability, 1985-06
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxta
title: 5. Board of Police Commissioners & City Administrative Officer, memo of understanding no. 24, 1989-03-01, to City Council

description: Board of Police Commissioners & City Administrative Officer, memo of understanding no. 24, 1989 March 1, to City Council. Witness file - Knecht Rita (2 of 2): Exhibit C - Memorandum of understanding no. 24 jointly submitted. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxsu
title: Correspondence, vol. 1 (1 of 2), 1991 Apr. 3-30

description: Correspondence, vol. 1 (1 of 2), 1991 April 3-30. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.1. Feess, fax, 1991-04-30, to Spiegel2. Churchill, letter, 1991-04-30, to Feess3. Cole, letter, 1991-04-29, to Feess4. Feess, letter, 1991-04-29, to Carlson5. Spiegel, fax, 1991-04-29, to Feess6. Ramirez questions outline, [1991]7. Epstein, fax, 1991-04-25, to Feess8. Epstein, fax, 1991-04-24, to Feess9. Epstein, memo, 1991-04-2410. Feess, fax, 1991-04-19, to Spiegel11. Feess, fax, 1991-04-19, to Spiegel12. Spiegel, fax, 1991-04-19, to Feess13. Spiegel, fax, 1991-04-19, to Feess14. Ray, memo, 1991-04-19, to Spiegel15. Mailing address and membership lists, 1991-04-1916. Feess, fax, 1991-04-19, to Drooyan17. Drooyan, fax, 1991-04-19, to Feess18. Spiegel, fax, 1991-04-18, to Feess19. Currey, letter, 1991-04-17, to Gotlieb20. Spiegel, memo, 1991-04-16, to Kelley21. Fisher, fax, 1991-04-15, to Feess22. Hall, letter, 1991-04-12, to Christopher23. Michel, memo, 1991-04-12, to Currey24. Spiegel, fax, 1991-04-12, to Feess25. Spiegel, fax, 1991-04-11, to Feess26. Spiegel, fax, 1991-04-11, to Feess27. Feess, letter, 1991-04-10, to Spiegel28. Spiegel, fax, 1991-04-10, to Feess29. Spiegel, fax, 1991-04-08, to Feess30. Spiegel, memo, 1991-04-0831. Godwin, letter, 1991-04-04, to Bradley32. Spiegel, fax, 1991-04-04, to Feess33. Anderson, fax, 1991-04-04, to Feess34. Bradley, letter, 1991-04-03, to Christopher35. Hevener, letter, 1991-04-08, to Gunson