cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13821070
title: Table 3 in A comparison of image and observer based aerial surveys of narwhal

description: Table 3. AIC values after fitting explanatory variables to the DS and MR models. The final model chosen, Model 1, is given in bold and ΔAIC indicates the difference between the chosen model and the specified model. HN indicates a half-normal form and HR indicates a hazard-rate form for the DS model. The explanatory variables are perpendicular distance (D), group size (S), group size as a factor with three classes (1, 2–5, and ≥ 6 narwhals) (S3), Beaufort (BF), side of airplane (SP), observer pair (O), and time to next observation ≤ 10 s (T). Appendix S3 provides an overview of all the models that were developed.
ModelDS modelMR modelNo. of parametersAICΔAIC1HN: D + BFD + O + S 351,330.9102HN: D + BFD + O + S51,332.811.903HN: D + BF + S3D + O + T61,333.102.194HN: D + BFD + O41,333.502.595HN: D + BF + S3D + O51,335.084.176HR: D + BFD + O + S351,336.976.06
description: Published as part of Bröker, Koen C. A., Hansen, Rikke G., Leonard, Kathleen E., Koski, William R. & Heide-Jørgensen, Mads Peter, 2019, A comparison of image and observer based aerial surveys of narwhal, pp. 1268 in Marine Mammal Science 35 (4) on page 1268, DOI: 10.1111/mms.12586, http://zenodo.org/record/13221822
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13821071
title: Table 4 in A comparison of image and observer based aerial surveys of narwhal

description: Table 4. Summary statistics of survey results and narwhal abundance estimates from surveys conducted in Melville Bay, West Greenland from 25 to 30 August 2014. Off-effort sightings by the aerial observers were only included in modeling of the detection function. Strata without narwhal sightings were excluded from this table (i.e., south and northwest). Abundance estimates are corrected for availability bias with â (0) being 0.257 for the aerial observer sightings and 0.22 for the image sightings. Aerial observer sightings were truncated at 1,300 m. CV values are given in parentheses. Ind. = individuals.
UncorrectedAbundanceEncounterMeandensityUncorrectedUncorrectedof individualsPlatformStratumEncounter rate (groups/km)rate (ind./km)group sizeof groups (groups/km2)density of ind. (ind./km2)abundance of individualscorrected for availability biasAerialNortheast0.032 (0.86)0.084 (0.78)2.6 (0.20)0.046 (0.93)0.115 (0.90)300.7 (0.89)1,171.0 (0.90)observersCentral0.068 (0.50)0.261(0.53)3.8 (0.11)0.046 (0.53)0.177 (0.52)366.5 (0.52)1,426.1 (0.53)All strata0.053 (0.41)0.187(0.44)3.5 (0.10)0.046 (0.58)0.142 (0.50)667.2 (0.50)2,596.1 (0.51)ImagesNortheast0.049 (0.94)0.105(0.92)2.1 (0.91)0.049 (0.94)0.105 (0.92)217.8 (0.92)990 (0.93)Central0.059 (0.70)0.130(0.61)2.2 (0.71)0.059 (0.70)0.130 (0.61)340.0 (0.61)1,545.5 (0.61)All strata0.055 (0.55)0.119(0.50)2.2 (0.78)0.055 (0.55)0.119 (0.50)557.8 (0.50)2,535.5 (0.51)
description: Published as part of Bröker, Koen C. A., Hansen, Rikke G., Leonard, Kathleen E., Koski, William R. & Heide-Jørgensen, Mads Peter, 2019, A comparison of image and observer based aerial surveys of narwhal, pp. 1270 in Marine Mammal Science 35 (4) on page 1270, DOI: 10.1111/mms.12586, http://zenodo.org/record/13221822
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13821072
title: Table 4 in A comparison of image and observer based aerial surveys of narwhal

description: Table 4. Summary statistics of survey results and narwhal abundance estimates from surveys conducted in Melville Bay, West Greenland from 25 to 30 August 2014. Off-effort sightings by the aerial observers were only included in modeling of the detection function. Strata without narwhal sightings were excluded from this table (i.e., south and northwest). Abundance estimates are corrected for availability bias with â (0) being 0.257 for the aerial observer sightings and 0.22 for the image sightings. Aerial observer sightings were truncated at 1,300 m. CV values are given in parentheses. Ind. = individuals.
UncorrectedAbundanceEncounterMeandensityUncorrectedUncorrectedof individualsPlatformStratumEncounter rate (groups/km)rate (ind./km)group sizeof groups (groups/km2)density of ind. (ind./km2)abundance of individualscorrected for availability biasAerialNortheast0.032 (0.86)0.084 (0.78)2.6 (0.20)0.046 (0.93)0.115 (0.90)300.7 (0.89)1,171.0 (0.90)observersCentral0.068 (0.50)0.261(0.53)3.8 (0.11)0.046 (0.53)0.177 (0.52)366.5 (0.52)1,426.1 (0.53)All strata0.053 (0.41)0.187(0.44)3.5 (0.10)0.046 (0.58)0.142 (0.50)667.2 (0.50)2,596.1 (0.51)ImagesNortheast0.049 (0.94)0.105(0.92)2.1 (0.91)0.049 (0.94)0.105 (0.92)217.8 (0.92)990 (0.93)Central0.059 (0.70)0.130(0.61)2.2 (0.71)0.059 (0.70)0.130 (0.61)340.0 (0.61)1,545.5 (0.61)All strata0.055 (0.55)0.119(0.50)2.2 (0.78)0.055 (0.55)0.119 (0.50)557.8 (0.50)2,535.5 (0.51)
description: Published as part of Bröker, Koen C. A., Hansen, Rikke G., Leonard, Kathleen E., Koski, William R. & Heide-Jørgensen, Mads Peter, 2019, A comparison of image and observer based aerial surveys of narwhal, pp. 1270 in Marine Mammal Science 35 (4) on page 1270, DOI: 10.1111/mms.12586, http://zenodo.org/record/13221822
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13821689
title: TABLE 2 in Description of new species of deep water Sthenolepis Willey, 1905 and Neoleanira Pettibone, 1970 (Annelida, Sigalionidae) from off Northern California, with the redescription of Sthenolepis spargens Fauchald, 1972

description: TABLE 2. Comparative table of the valid species of Neoleanira Pettibone, 1970b (Read & Fauchald 2024), including the geographical and bathymetrical distribution. The number of times in sizes relationships between wide and length is given by ‘×’.
N. areolata (McIntosh, 1885)N. magellanica (McIntosh, 1885)N. racemosa (Fauchald, 1972)N. tetragona (Örsted, 1845)N. solitaria n. sp.Type localitySouth of Yedo, Japan San Nicolas Basin, California (synonym Leanira calcis)Off little Wellington Island, ChileGuaymas Basin, Gulf of California, MexicoChristianiafjord, NorwayW of Farallon Islands, California, USADepth (m)280–1,370485–6751,774–2,90040–2,2002,560Median antenna style size compared to its ceratophore5–7× as long8× as long–6× as long8× as longLateral antennae style size compared to prostomium2× as long3× as longShorter1.5× as long2× as longAuricle size compared to median ceratophore¼× as long½× as long½× as long1/3× as long1/3× as longPalps size (reach segment)Segment 19Segment 30–Segment 20Segment 20Tentacular cirri size compared to parapodia4× as long5× as longSimilar lengthSlightly longer3× as longSize of dorsal cirrus from segment 3 compared to the parapodiaSlightly longerAs long as parapodiumSlightly longerSimilarSlightly longerSimple chaetae in posterior neuropodiaAbsentAbsentAbsentAbsentPresentNeurochaetae canaliculatePresentPresentAbsentPresentPresentNeurochaetal handles (distal section)Subdistal spinesSmoothDistal spinesSmoothSubdistal and distal spinesFirst branchiaeSegment 6Segment 7Segment 2Segment 6Segment 2First ctenidial padsSegment 6Segment 7–Segment 6Segment 1Branchiae with a spurlike processPresentAbsentAbsentAbsentAbsentVentral ctenidiaBoot-shapedClavate–ClavateBoot-shapedElytral surface/MarginSmooth/FimbriaeGranular/Smooth–Smooth/FimbriaeSmooth/FimbriaeReferenceMcIntosh 1885; Hartman 1960; Pettibone 1970b; Imajima 2003McIntosh 1885; Pettibone 1970bFauchald 1972; Pettibone 1989Örsted 1845; Pettibone 1970bThis study
description: Published as part of Cruz-Gómez, Christopher & Blake, James A., 2024, Description of new species of deep water Sthenolepis Willey, 1905 and Neoleanira Pettibone, 1970 (Annelida, Sigalionidae) from off Northern California, with the redescription of Sthenolepis spargens Fauchald, 1972, pp. 242 in Zootaxa 5507 (2) on page 242, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5507.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/13757500
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13821680
title: Table 1 in Breeding biology of mimetic species based on secondary data sources should address misidentifications: the case of the lesser kiskadee Philohydor lictor (Aves: Tyrannidae)

description: Table 1. Misidentifications in breeding records of lesser kiskadee (Philohydor lictor) found in citizen science databases (WikiAves, eBird, iNaturalist), museum egg sets, and literature up to August 2023. NA indicates that no information was available.
Misidentification typeLocalityYearRecord typeCode/reference/museumDomed nestAmazonas, Brazil2015Citizen scienceWA1599942Domed nestColón, Panama2016Citizen scienceML34302821Domed nestPará, Brazil2018Citizen scienceWA3137441Domed nestRondônia, Brazil2021Citizen scienceWA4371921Domed nestMeta, Colombia2022Citizen science145727415Domed nestGuyana1848LiteratureSchomburgk (1848)Domed nestBrazil1997LiteratureEuler (1867)Domed nestRio de Janeiro, Brazil1900LiteratureEuler (1900)Larger eggsNANALiteratureOates and Reid (1903)Domed nestGuyana1929LiteratureYoung (1929)Domed nestBrazil1935LiteratureSnethlage (1935)Outside species rangeArgentinaNALiteratureHellebrekers (1942)Outside species rangeArgentinaNALiteratureHellebrekers (1945)Domed nestGuyana1936LiteratureDavis (1961)Larger eggsNA1832MuseumMNHN–489/490Larger eggs; outside species rangeArgentina1898MuseumZBM–SNOutside species rangeArgentina1901MuseumNBCN–181945Outside species rangeSanta Catarina, Brazil1908MuseumSNMB–24013Outside species rangeSanta Catarina, Brazil<1910MuseumSNMB–24012Outside species rangeSanta Catarina, Brazil<1910MuseumSNMB–24014Larger eggs; domed nestSucre, Venezuela1934MuseumDMNH–10519Larger eggsBrazilNAMuseumWFVZ–184215
description: Published as part of Silva, Tatiane Lima da, Heming, Neander Marcel & Marini, Miguel Ângelo, 2024, Breeding biology of mimetic species based on secondary data sources should address misidentifications: the case of the lesser kiskadee Philohydor lictor (Aves: Tyrannidae), pp. 1058 in Journal of Natural History 58 (29 - 32) on page 1058, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2024.2380524, http://zenodo.org/record/13758097
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13821681
title: Table 1 in Breeding biology of mimetic species based on secondary data sources should address misidentifications: the case of the lesser kiskadee Philohydor lictor (Aves: Tyrannidae)

description: Table 1. Misidentifications in breeding records of lesser kiskadee (Philohydor lictor) found in citizen science databases (WikiAves, eBird, iNaturalist), museum egg sets, and literature up to August 2023. NA indicates that no information was available.
Misidentification typeLocalityYearRecord typeCode/reference/museumDomed nestAmazonas, Brazil2015Citizen scienceWA1599942Domed nestColón, Panama2016Citizen scienceML34302821Domed nestPará, Brazil2018Citizen scienceWA3137441Domed nestRondônia, Brazil2021Citizen scienceWA4371921Domed nestMeta, Colombia2022Citizen science145727415Domed nestGuyana1848LiteratureSchomburgk (1848)Domed nestBrazil1997LiteratureEuler (1867)Domed nestRio de Janeiro, Brazil1900LiteratureEuler (1900)Larger eggsNANALiteratureOates and Reid (1903)Domed nestGuyana1929LiteratureYoung (1929)Domed nestBrazil1935LiteratureSnethlage (1935)Outside species rangeArgentinaNALiteratureHellebrekers (1942)Outside species rangeArgentinaNALiteratureHellebrekers (1945)Domed nestGuyana1936LiteratureDavis (1961)Larger eggsNA1832MuseumMNHN–489/490Larger eggs; outside species rangeArgentina1898MuseumZBM–SNOutside species rangeArgentina1901MuseumNBCN–181945Outside species rangeSanta Catarina, Brazil1908MuseumSNMB–24013Outside species rangeSanta Catarina, Brazil<1910MuseumSNMB–24012Outside species rangeSanta Catarina, Brazil<1910MuseumSNMB–24014Larger eggs; domed nestSucre, Venezuela1934MuseumDMNH–10519Larger eggsBrazilNAMuseumWFVZ–184215
description: Published as part of Silva, Tatiane Lima da, Heming, Neander Marcel & Marini, Miguel Ângelo, 2024, Breeding biology of mimetic species based on secondary data sources should address misidentifications: the case of the lesser kiskadee Philohydor lictor (Aves: Tyrannidae), pp. 1058 in Journal of Natural History 58 (29 - 32) on page 1058, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2024.2380524, http://zenodo.org/record/13758097
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13821682
title: Table 2 in Breeding biology of mimetic species based on secondary data sources should address misidentifications: the case of the lesser kiskadee Philohydor lictor (Aves: Tyrannidae)

description: Table 2. Comparison of traits among eight kiskadee-like mimetic species. Body mass from Dunning (2007) and Tobias et al. (2022), bill length from (Tobias et al. 2022), nest type, clutch size, and range from Billerman et al. (2020).
Body mass Bill length (g) (mm)Egg length (mm)Egg width (mm)Egg volume (mm3)Egg pointednessClutch sizeNest typeRangeSmaller body size mimetic speciesPhilohydor lictor25.523.420.89 ± 1.4116.06 ± 0.662734.66 ± 334.870.0002 ± 0.00011–4Open cupE Panama to E BrazilMyiozetetes cayanensis25.914.422.17 ± 0.9915.99 ± 0.672894.08 ± 317.260.0003 ± 0.00012–3DomedSW Costa Rica to SE BrazilMyiozetetes similis2816.6422.21 ± 1.0916.03 ± 0.642897.21 ± 303.410.0004 ± 0.00022–4DomedW Mexico to NE ArgentinaPhelpsia inornata29.417.921 ± 0.4215.95 ± 0.072690 ± 84.850.0003 ± 0.000082Open cupN and C Venezuela to NE ColombiaConopias parvus212021.26 ± 0.3515.98 ± 0.382787.19 ± 191.050.0002 ± 0.000032–3Tree hole orS and E Venezuela to N Bolívia andcavityN BrasilC. trivirgatus24.3616.620.9815.762647.620.0003NATree hole orVenezuela to N Brazil and SE Brazil to NEcavityArgentinaLarger body size mimetic speciesP. lictor: misidentified__29.03 ± 1.9219.84 ± 0.355799.84 ± 543.710.0004 ± 0.00012–3__eggsMegarynchus63.432.8228.01 ± 1.5320.19 ± 0.555863.74 ± 520.850.0003 ± 0.00022–3Open cupSE Mexico to S ArgentinapitanguaPitangus sulphuratus742927.93 ± 1.5219.94 ± 0.745657.18 ± 564.550.0003 ± 0.00012–5DomedS Texas to C Argentina
description: Published as part of Silva, Tatiane Lima da, Heming, Neander Marcel & Marini, Miguel Ângelo, 2024, Breeding biology of mimetic species based on secondary data sources should address misidentifications: the case of the lesser kiskadee Philohydor lictor (Aves: Tyrannidae), pp. 1062 in Journal of Natural History 58 (29 - 32) on page 1062, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2024.2380524, http://zenodo.org/record/13758097
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13821683
title: Table 2 in Breeding biology of mimetic species based on secondary data sources should address misidentifications: the case of the lesser kiskadee Philohydor lictor (Aves: Tyrannidae)

description: Table 2. Comparison of traits among eight kiskadee-like mimetic species. Body mass from Dunning (2007) and Tobias et al. (2022), bill length from (Tobias et al. 2022), nest type, clutch size, and range from Billerman et al. (2020).
Body mass Bill length (g) (mm)Egg length (mm)Egg width (mm)Egg volume (mm3)Egg pointednessClutch sizeNest typeRangeSmaller body size mimetic speciesPhilohydor lictor25.523.420.89 ± 1.4116.06 ± 0.662734.66 ± 334.870.0002 ± 0.00011–4Open cupE Panama to E BrazilMyiozetetes cayanensis25.914.422.17 ± 0.9915.99 ± 0.672894.08 ± 317.260.0003 ± 0.00012–3DomedSW Costa Rica to SE BrazilMyiozetetes similis2816.6422.21 ± 1.0916.03 ± 0.642897.21 ± 303.410.0004 ± 0.00022–4DomedW Mexico to NE ArgentinaPhelpsia inornata29.417.921 ± 0.4215.95 ± 0.072690 ± 84.850.0003 ± 0.000082Open cupN and C Venezuela to NE ColombiaConopias parvus212021.26 ± 0.3515.98 ± 0.382787.19 ± 191.050.0002 ± 0.000032–3Tree hole orS and E Venezuela to N Bolívia andcavityN BrasilC. trivirgatus24.3616.620.9815.762647.620.0003NATree hole orVenezuela to N Brazil and SE Brazil to NEcavityArgentinaLarger body size mimetic speciesP. lictor: misidentified__29.03 ± 1.9219.84 ± 0.355799.84 ± 543.710.0004 ± 0.00012–3__eggsMegarynchus63.432.8228.01 ± 1.5320.19 ± 0.555863.74 ± 520.850.0003 ± 0.00022–3Open cupSE Mexico to S ArgentinapitanguaPitangus sulphuratus742927.93 ± 1.5219.94 ± 0.745657.18 ± 564.550.0003 ± 0.00012–5DomedS Texas to C Argentina
description: Published as part of Silva, Tatiane Lima da, Heming, Neander Marcel & Marini, Miguel Ângelo, 2024, Breeding biology of mimetic species based on secondary data sources should address misidentifications: the case of the lesser kiskadee Philohydor lictor (Aves: Tyrannidae), pp. 1062 in Journal of Natural History 58 (29 - 32) on page 1062, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2024.2380524, http://zenodo.org/record/13758097
DOI: 10.15468/dl.fcpgez
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 99744 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "BasisOfRecord is Human Observation",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 "TaxonKey is Ortygornis sephaena (A.Smith, 1836)"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 99744 records from 24 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0027502-240906103802322/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13821589
title: TABLE 1 in Are some of the birds endemic to the Tres Marías Islands (Mexico) species?

description: TABLE 1 Bird taxa endemic or nearly endemic to the Tres Marías islands. Taxa considered herein to be species are in boldface.
Scientific nameEnglish namePatagioenas flavirostris madrensisRed-billed PigeonLeptotila verreauxi capitalisWhite-tipped DoveNyctidromus albicollis insularisCommon PauraqueCynanthus latirostris lawrenceiBroad-billed HummingbirdAmazilia rutila graysoniCinnamon HummingbirdButeo jamaicensis fumosusRed-tailed HawkPicoides scalaris graysoniLadder-backed WoodpeckerCaracara cheriway pallidusCrested CaracaraForpus cyanopygius insularisMexican ParrotletAmazona oratrix tresmariaeYellow-headed ParrotMyiopagis viridicata minimaGreenish ElaeniaPachyramphus aglaiae insularisRose-throated BecardVireo hypochryseus sordidusGolden VireoVireo flavoviridis forreriYellow-green VireoPheugopedius felix lawrenciiHappy WrenMyadestes occidentalis insularisBrown-backed SolitaireTurdus rufopalliatus graysoniRufous-backed RobinMelanotis caerulescens longirostrisBlue MockingbirdSpinus psaltria witiLesser GoldfinchSetophaga pitiayumi insularisTropical ParulaPiranga bidentata flammeaFlame-coloured TanagerCardinalis cardinalis mariaeNorthern CardinalGranatellus venustus francescaeRed-breasted ChatIcterus pustulatus graysoniiStreak-backed Oriole
description: Published as part of Silva, Héctor Gómez de, Pérez Villafaña, Mónica G., Cruz-Nieto, Javier & Cruz-Nieto, Miguel Ángel, 2020, Are some of the birds endemic to the Tres Marías Islands (Mexico) species?, pp. 8 in Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club 140 (1) on page 8, DOI: 10.25226/bboc.v140i1.2020.a3, http://zenodo.org/record/13755707
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13821590
title: TABLE 1 in Are some of the birds endemic to the Tres Marías Islands (Mexico) species?

description: TABLE 1 Bird taxa endemic or nearly endemic to the Tres Marías islands. Taxa considered herein to be species are in boldface.
Scientific nameEnglish namePatagioenas flavirostris madrensisRed-billed PigeonLeptotila verreauxi capitalisWhite-tipped DoveNyctidromus albicollis insularisCommon PauraqueCynanthus latirostris lawrenceiBroad-billed HummingbirdAmazilia rutila graysoniCinnamon HummingbirdButeo jamaicensis fumosusRed-tailed HawkPicoides scalaris graysoniLadder-backed WoodpeckerCaracara cheriway pallidusCrested CaracaraForpus cyanopygius insularisMexican ParrotletAmazona oratrix tresmariaeYellow-headed ParrotMyiopagis viridicata minimaGreenish ElaeniaPachyramphus aglaiae insularisRose-throated BecardVireo hypochryseus sordidusGolden VireoVireo flavoviridis forreriYellow-green VireoPheugopedius felix lawrenciiHappy WrenMyadestes occidentalis insularisBrown-backed SolitaireTurdus rufopalliatus graysoniRufous-backed RobinMelanotis caerulescens longirostrisBlue MockingbirdSpinus psaltria witiLesser GoldfinchSetophaga pitiayumi insularisTropical ParulaPiranga bidentata flammeaFlame-coloured TanagerCardinalis cardinalis mariaeNorthern CardinalGranatellus venustus francescaeRed-breasted ChatIcterus pustulatus graysoniiStreak-backed Oriole
description: Published as part of Silva, Héctor Gómez de, Pérez Villafaña, Mónica G., Cruz-Nieto, Javier & Cruz-Nieto, Miguel Ángel, 2020, Are some of the birds endemic to the Tres Marías Islands (Mexico) species?, pp. 8 in Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club 140 (1) on page 8, DOI: 10.25226/bboc.v140i1.2020.a3, http://zenodo.org/record/13755707
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13821826
title: Table 1 in Phytochemical characterization, and antioxidant and antibacterial activities of the hydroethanolic extract of Anadenanthera peregrina stem bark

description: Table 1. Phytochemical prospecting of the main secondary metabolite groups of the hydroethanolic extract of A. peregrina stem bark.
Secondary metaboliteHydroethanolic extract of A. peregrinaCardiac glycosidesKedd reagent test++Keller–Kiliani reagent test++Baljet reagent test-Raymond–Marthoud reagent test+++AlkaloidsLibermann–Bouchardat reagent test-Wagner reagent test-Mayer’s reagent test-Organic acidsPascová reagent test++Reducing sugarsFehling reagent test++Non-reducing sugarsFehling + HCl test-CoumarinsUV light 254 and 365 nm+SaponinsFoamy-Haemolytic+++PolysaccharidesReactive lugol-PhenolsFeCl 3 Tannins+++FeCl3 FlavonoidsGrPb(C2 H 3O2)2++Purines-Catechins+++Benzoquinone derivatives+++Depsids and depsidones+++Steroids and triterpenoids-Sesquiterpenolactones-
description: Published as part of Marinho, T. A., Oliveira, M. G., Menezes-Filho, A. C. P., Castro, C. F. S., Oliveira, I. M. M., Borges, L. L., Melo-Reis, P. R. & Silva-Jr, N. J., 2022, Phytochemical characterization, and antioxidant and antibacterial activities of the hydroethanolic extract of Anadenanthera peregrina stem bark, pp. 4 in Brazilian Journal of Biology (e 234476) 82 on page 4, DOI: 10.1590/1519-6984.234476, http://zenodo.org/record/11552679
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13821828
title: Table 2 in Phytochemical characterization, and antioxidant and antibacterial activities of the hydroethanolic extract of Anadenanthera peregrina stem bark

description: Table 2. Physicochemical properties,antioxidant activity,and total phenolic content of the hydroethanolic extract of A.peregrina stem bark.
SamplepHDensity (g cm 3)DPPH (IC 50)Total Phenolics (g GAE 100 g- 1)A. peregrina extract5.21 ± 0.010.95644.13 mg mL-16.40 ± 0.08
description: Published as part of Marinho, T. A., Oliveira, M. G., Menezes-Filho, A. C. P., Castro, C. F. S., Oliveira, I. M. M., Borges, L. L., Melo-Reis, P. R. & Silva-Jr, N. J., 2022, Phytochemical characterization, and antioxidant and antibacterial activities of the hydroethanolic extract of Anadenanthera peregrina stem bark, pp. 4 in Brazilian Journal of Biology (e 234476) 82 on page 4, DOI: 10.1590/1519-6984.234476, http://zenodo.org/record/11552679
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13821830
title: Table 3 in Phytochemical characterization, and antioxidant and antibacterial activities of the hydroethanolic extract of Anadenanthera peregrina stem bark

description: Table 3. Diameter of the inhibitory zone of the hydroethanolic extract of Anadenanthera peregrina stem bark against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922).
A. peregrina extract concentrationStrainC +C -50 µL100 µL200 µLE. coli---29 mm-S. aureus10 mm16 mm20 mm35 mm-
description: Published as part of Marinho, T. A., Oliveira, M. G., Menezes-Filho, A. C. P., Castro, C. F. S., Oliveira, I. M. M., Borges, L. L., Melo-Reis, P. R. & Silva-Jr, N. J., 2022, Phytochemical characterization, and antioxidant and antibacterial activities of the hydroethanolic extract of Anadenanthera peregrina stem bark, pp. 5 in Brazilian Journal of Biology (e 234476) 82 on page 5, DOI: 10.1590/1519-6984.234476, http://zenodo.org/record/11552679