cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.15454/ioblws/9ii21e
title: Injury_Exp3.tab

description: Level of root injuries recorded in Experiment 3._____Subplot_ID = Identifier of the 3m x 3m subplot;___Broccoli_ID = Identifier of the broccoli;___Treatment = Experimental treatment;___Dosdall_injury_class = Qualitative assessment of root injuries following the ordered scale defined by Dosdall et al. (1994) (see main text);___Area_injured = Dosdall injury class expressed in percent root area injured
DOI: 10.15454/ioblws/b99bgl
title: Harvest_dates_Exp2.tab

description: Date of broccoli harvest in Experiment 2. **Used for the Fig. 1 only (experiment timeline)**_____Date = Harvest date;___Treatment = Experimental treatment (Ep for "Predators excluded");___Cluster_ID = Identifier of the cluster (40 clusters dispersed in the field's length and width);___Broccoli_ID = Identifier of the broccoli harvested
DOI: 10.15454/ioblws/bi8xla
title: Aphids_Exp2.tab

description: Presents the number of aphids counted in Experiment 2._____Date = Date of the aphid count;___Date_day_number = Date of the aphid count expressed in number of days after planting;___Session_mean_date = When all aphids counts could not be performed in one day, average date of the counting session;___Session_mean_date_day_number = When all aphids counts could not be performed in one day, average date of the counting session expressed in number of days after planting;___Session_number = Number (as factor) of the counting session;___Cluster_ID = Identifier of the cluster (40 clusters dispersed in the field's length and width);___Broccoli_ID = Identifier of the broccoli on which the count was performed Treatment = Experimental treatment (Ep for Predators excluded);___Unparasitized_aphids = Number of unparasitized aphids found on the plant;___Parasitized_aphids = Number of parasitized aphids found on the plant;___Total_aphids = Total number of aphids (unparasitized + parasitized) found on the plant;___Parasitism_rate = (Parasitized_aphids / Total_aphids)
DOI: 10.15454/ioblws/butliu
title: Mortality_Exp3.tab

description: Plant mortality as recorded weekly in Experiment 3._____Sampling session = Sampling date start (format "dd/mm")-Sampling date end (format "dd/mm");___Session_number = Number (as factor) of the counting session;___Date = Date;___Date_day_number = Date expressed in number of days after planting;___Subplot_ID = Identifier of the 3m x 3m subplot;___Broccoli_ID = Identifier of the broccoli;___Treatment = Experimental treatment;___Status = Dead or alive
DOI: 10.15454/ioblws/cdmtgk
title: Eggs_Exp1.tab

description: Egg laying dynamics in Experiment 1. **Used for the Fig. 1 only (experiment timeline)**_____Sampling session = Sampling date start (format "dd/mm")-Sampling date end (format "dd/mm");___Session_number = Number (as factor) of the counting session;___Start_date = Sampling date start;___End_date = Sampling date end;___Start_day_number = Sampling date start expressed in number of days after planting;___End_day_number = Sampling date end expressed in number of days after planting;___Mid_session_day_number = Date representing the middle of the sampling period (used for graphics), expressed in number of days after planting;___Ndays = Number of days elapsed in the sampling period;___Treatment = Experimental treatment (Ep for "Predators excluded");___Subplot_ID = Identifier of the 3m x 3m subplot;___Broccoli_ID = Identifier of the broccoli with felt trap;___Neggs = Number of eggs laid in the sampling period
DOI: 10.15454/ioblws/dixdjs
title: Eggs_Exp2.tab

description: Egg laying dynamics in Experiment 2. **Used for the Fig. 1 only (experiment timeline)**_____Sampling session = Sampling date start (format "dd/mm")-Sampling date end (format "dd/mm");___Session_number = Number (as factor) of the counting session;___Start_date = Sampling date start;___End_date = Sampling date end;___Start_day_number = Sampling date start expressed in number of days after planting;___End_day_number = Sampling date end expressed in number of days after planting;___Mid_session_day_number = Date representing the middle of the sampling period (used for graphics), expressed in number of days after planting;___Ndays = Number of days elapsed in the sampling period;___Treatment = Experimental treatment (Ep for "Predators excluded");___Cluster_ID = Identifier of the cluster (40 clusters dispersed in the field's length and width);___Broccoli_ID = Identifier of the broccoli with felt trap;___Neggs = Number of eggs laid in the sampling period
DOI: 10.15454/ioblws/ejmpgu
title: Pupae_Exp1.tab

description: Number of pupae per plant in Experiment 1. As plant mortality modifies the time available for larvae development, only data collected on alive plants were kept._____Subplot_ID = Identifier of the 3m x 3m subplot;___Broccoli_ID = Identifier of the broccoli;___Treatment = Experimental treatment;___Npupae = Number of pupae of the cabbage root fly
DOI: 10.15454/ioblws/olgwtf
title: CRF_Parasitism_Exp3.tab

description: Presents the parasitism of the cabbage root fly pupae in Experiment 3._____Treatment = Experimental treatment (Ep for "Predators excluded");___Subplot_ID = Identifier of the 3m x 3m subplot;___Broccoli_ID = Identifier of the broccoli;___D.radicum = Number of Delia radicum emerged;___T.rapae = Number of Trybliographa rapae emerged;___Aleochara = Number of Aleochara sp. emerged;___Unidentified_parasitoid = Number of unidentified parasitoid emerged;___Unidentified_emergent = Number of unidentified emergent;___Nidentified_emergent = Number of identified emergent (either D. radicum or parasitoid);___Nparasitized_pupae = Number of parasitized pupae (T. rapae + Aleochara sp. + Unidentified_parasitoid)
DOI: 10.15454/ioblws/pvkjyx
title: Mesmin_et_al_2021_JPS.Rmd

description: R code used to perform the statistics and graphics presented in Mesmin et al. (2021). Biological control at work: Demonstrating the complementary effects of natural enemies on two contrasting pests and the damage they cause. Journal of Pest Science.___Table of contents:___I. Packages and RData loading;___II. Presentation of the structure and metadata of each table;___III. Code used to perform statistical tests (organized per experiment and per response variable);___IV. Code used to perform Fig1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 (Fig 6 not performed in R);___V. Code used to perform the tests and graphics presented in the Supplementary Materials of the article
DOI: 10.15454/ioblws/qz8k2c
title: Cumulated_egg_laying_Exp2.tab

description: Presents the cumulated number of eggs laid per plant in Experiment 2._____Treatment = Experimental treatment (Ep for "Predators excluded");___Cluster_ID = Identifier of the cluster (40 clusters dispersed in the field's length and width). There are two data per cluster: one per treatment;___Neggs = Cumulated number of eggs laid over the whole egg laying period
DOI: 10.15454/ioblws/rzhzci
title: Pupae_Exp2.tab

description: Number of pupae per plant in Experiment 2. As plant mortality modifies the time available for larvae development, only data collected on alive plants were kept._____Cluster_ID = Identifier of the cluster (40 clusters dispersed in the field's length and width);___Broccoli_ID = Identifier of the broccoli;___Treatment = Experimental treatment;___Npupae = Number of pupae of the cabbage root fly;___Cum_eggs_laid_in_ttmt = Mean cumulated number of eggs laid per plant in each experimental treatment. Only two treatments were used for egg laying monitoring. The data for Eelp and Eeel treatments were computed using the number of eggs laid in Ep and Control treatments for appropriate time lapses.
DOI: 10.15454/ioblws/to3qtw
title: CRF_Parasitism_Exp2.tab

description: Presents the parasitism of the cabbage root fly pupae in Experiment 2._____Treatment = Experimental treatment (Ep for "Predators excluded early", Eelp for "Predators excluded at the egg laying peak, Eeel for "Predators excluded at the end of egg laying);___Cluster_ID = Identifier of the cluster (40 clusters dispersed in the field's length and width);___Broccoli_ID = Identifier of the broccoli;___D.radicum = Number of Delia radicum emerged;___T.rapae = Number of Trybliographa rapae emerged;___Aleochara = Number of Aleochara sp. emerged;___Unidentified_parasitoid = Number of unidentified parasitoid emerged;___Unidentified_emergent = Number of unidentified emergent;___Nidentified_emergent = Number of identified emergent (either D. radicum or parasitoid);___Nparasitized_pupae = Number of parasitized pupae (T. rapae + Aleochara sp. + Unidentified_parasitoid)
DOI: 10.15454/ioblws/tvlhya
title: Cumulated_egg_laying_Exp3.tab

description: Presents the cumulated number of eggs laid per plant in Experiment 3._____Treatment = Experimental treatment (Ep for "Predators excluded");___Subplot_ID = Identifier of the 3m x 3m subplot (four data per subplot because four felt traps per subplot);___Neggs = Cumulated number of eggs laid over the whole egg laying period
DOI: 10.15454/ioblws/vxnqur
title: Eggs_Exp3.tab

description: Egg laying dynamics in Experiment 3. **Used for the Fig. 1 only (experiment timeline)**_____Sampling session = Sampling date start (format "dd/mm")-Sampling date end (format "dd/mm");___Session_number = Number (as factor) of the counting session;___Start_date = Sampling date start;___End_date = Sampling date end;___Start_day_number = Sampling date start expressed in number of days after planting;___End_day_number = Sampling date end expressed in number of days after planting;___Mid_session_day_number = Date representing the middle of the sampling period (used for graphics), expressed in number of days after planting;___Ndays = Number of days elapsed in the sampling period;___Treatment = Experimental treatment (Ep for "Predators excluded");___Subplot_ID = Identifier of the 3m x 3m subplot;___Broccoli_ID = Identifier of the broccoli with felt trap;___Neggs = Number of eggs laid in the sampling period
DOI: 10.15454/ioblws/wuttno
title: Pupae_Exp3.tab

description: Number of pupae per plant in Experiment 3. As plant mortality modifies the time available for larvae development, only data collected on alive plants were kept._____Subplot_ID = Identifier of the 3m x 3m subplot;___Broccoli_ID = Identifier of the broccoli;___Treatment = Experimental treatment;___Npupae = Number of pupae of the cabbage root fly
DOI: 10.15454/ioblws/yr581q
title: Mesmin_et_al_2021_JPS.RData

description: Twenty tables plus one tailored function necessary to perform the statistics and graphics shown in Mesmin et al. (2021). Biological control at work: Demonstrating the complementary effects of natural enemies on two contrasting pests and the damage they cause. Journal of Pest Science.___Metadata of each table are given in the second section of Mesmin_et_al_2021_JPS.Rmd downloadable below.___Each table can also be downloaded separately in csv format below.
DOI: 10.15454/ioblws/zvkx7u
title: Arthropod_exclusion_Exp1.tab

description: Presents the number of ground dwelling arthropods trapped in Experiment 1 to test the efficiency of the partially buried barriers._____Sampling session = Sampling date start (format "dd/mm")-Sampling date end (format "dd/mm");___Session_number = Number (as factor) of the counting session;___Start_date = Sampling date start;___End_date = Sampling date end;___Start_day_number = Sampling date start expressed in number of days after planting;___End_day_number = Sampling date end expressed in number of days after planting;___Mid_session_day_number = Date representing the middle of the sampling period (used for graphics), expressed in number of days after planting;___Ndays = Number of days elapsed in the sampling period;___Ntraps = Number of traps on which data could be used (usually 13, but sometimes less due to strong rain filling the traps with water);___Treatment = Experimental treatment (Predators excluded with pitfall traps and barriers; Method control with only pitfall traps);___Subplot_ID = Identifier of the 3m x 3m subplot;___Carabidae = Number of carabid beetles trapped;___Staphylinidae = Number of staphylinid beetles trapped;___Araneae = Number of spiders trapped;___Opiliones = Number of harvestmen trapped
DOI: 10.15454/iogznj/ny6n8b
title: CO2 diffusivity in semi-hard cheese in relatio_24_01_20.csv

description: Data associated to the table in csv format
DOI: 10.15454/iogznj/phscvv
title: CO2 diffusivity in semi-hard cheese in relatio_24_01_20.owl

description: Data associated to the table in owl format
DOI: 10.15454/iopgyf/i8rlyg
title: FruitBreedomics_apple_253K_SNP.bim

description: FruitBreedomics_apple_253K_SNP.bim : Description of 253,095 SNP loci genotyped using the Axiom®Apple480K array (Bianco et al., 2016): position on GDDH13 v1.1 reference genome (Daccord et al 2017) together with reference and alternative alleles, in plink binary format (see http://zzz.bwh.harvard.edu/plink/data.shtml#bed).
DOI: 10.15454/iopgyf/ilyb36
title: FruitBreedomics_apple_320K_SNP.bim

description: FruitBreedomics_apple_320K_SNP.bim: description of the 320,761 SNP loci genotyped using the Axiom®Apple480K array: position on GDDH13 v1.1 reference genome (Daccord et al 2017) together with reference and alternative alleles.
DOI: 10.15454/iopgyf/mgsy3h
title: FruitBreedomics_apple_320K_SNP.fam

description: FruitBreedomics_apple_320K_SNP.fam: identifiers of apple genotypes, under the form of their Malus UNiQue genotype code (MUNQ) for the 1355 accessions or their within-progeny identifier for the 92 apple progeny individuals. The MUNQ codes are also listed in the dataset “MUNQ - Malus UNiQue genotype code for grouping apple accessions corresponding to a unique genotypic profile” (https://doi.org/10.15454/HKGMAS).
DOI: 10.15454/iopgyf/n8koyk
title: FruitBreedomics_apple_320K_SNP.bed

description: FruitBreedomics_apple_320K_SNP.bed: 320K genotyping matrix. Genotyping of 320,761 SNP loci on 1447 apple genotypes obtained using the Axiom®Apple480K array. Filtering of SNPs is described in the Supplementary_methods document associated with Jung et al (2020) and relied mainly on the pedigree described in Muranty et al (2020) after SNP classification using the Axiom Analysis Suite software. Position of loci on GDDH13 v1.1 reference genome (Daccord et al 2017) are listed in file FruitBreedomics_apple_320K_SNP.bim
DOI: 10.15454/iopgyf/nxc1jt
title: FruitBreedomics_apple_material_description_v2.tab

description: FruitBreedomics_apple_material_description_v2.txt list of the 1447 unique Malus x domestica genotypes analyzed, with the name attributed to the MUNQ (MUNQ_Preferred_name), the ploidy level (Ploidy), the accession number of the accession used to represent the MUNQ in genotyping (Accession_number), the institution holding the accession (Holding_Institution), the country where the institution is located, the accession number of the accession used to represent the MUNQ in the apple reference population, if used (REFPOP_Accession_Number), the institution holding the accession (REFPOP_Accession_Holding_Institution), and the country where the institution is located (Country_REFPOP_Accession_holding_Institution). In column REFPOP_Accession_Number, "additional reference material" and "additional validation material" indicate genotypes used as reference for imputation and for imputation accuracy estimation, respectively, in Jung et al. (2020).
DOI: 10.15454/iopgyf/qzqirf
title: FruitBreedomics_apple_253K_SNP.fam

description: FruitBreedomics_apple_253K_SNP.fam : Identifiers of apple genotypes, under the form of their Malus UNiQue genotype code (MUNQ), in plink binary format (see http://zzz.bwh.harvard.edu/plink/data.shtml#bed).
DOI: 10.15454/iopgyf/skz8f0
title: FruitBreedomics_apple_253K_SNP.bed

description: FruitBreedomics_apple_253K_SNP.bed : 253K genotyping matrix in plink binary format (see http://zzz.bwh.harvard.edu/plink/data.shtml#bed). Genotyping of 253,095 SNP loci on 1,433 apple genotypes was obtained using the Axiom®Apple480K array (Bianco et al 2016, doi: 10.1111/tpj.13145). The sub-set of 275,223 robust SNPs previously selected by Bianco et al. (2016) was further filtered by removing 22,128 SNPs showing a Mendelian error in two or more accepted relationships (showing fewer than 1,000 Mendelian errors in the set of 275,223 robust SNPs). Position of loci on GDDH13 v1.1 reference genome (Daccord et al 2017, doi:10.1038/ng.3886) are listed in file FruitBreedomics_apple_253K_SNP.bim.
DOI: 10.15454/iopgyf/xoltms
title: FruitBreedomics_apple_material_description.tab

description: FruitBreedomics_apple_material_description.xlsx : List of the 1433 unique Malus x domestica genotypes (MUNQ) analyzed, with the accession number of the accession used to represent the MUNQ in genotyping (Accession code), the preferred name attributed to the MUNQ (Preferred Name), and the ploidy level (Ploidy).
DOI: 10.15454/ioxqu2/wyq7ky
title: rpg_complete_2018_d57.zip

description: :unav
DOI: 10.15454/iql6ge/vvwvhp
title: cattle_680338variants_528individuals.tar.xz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.15454/irdmyu/btssy3
title: DataFile_Monteiro et al_Frontiers_2021.csv

description: CSV File with ";" delimiter. First line : variables long name Second line : Variables short name Third line : units Lines 4-2004 : individual datat for each pig
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/11ccbh
title: Laurent_et_al_preprint.docx
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/2hqcdd
title: Figure 1.jpg

description: Phenotypic characteristics of INRA-156, INRA-156ΔMat (parental strain), and INRA-171 (parental strain). a. Disease severity (infected spikelet / total spikelet number) measured at 22 days post inoculation (dpi). b. Trichothecene of type B quantification in µg of mycotoxin per gram of dried spike. c. Pictures of Royssac variety wheat spikes inoculated with INRA-171, INRA-156 or INRA-156ΔMat strains. d. Pictures of the wild-type strains grown of PDA medium. * INRA-156 and INRA-156ΔMat show similar morphology.
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/2lfh06
title: Figure 6.jpg

description: Phenotyping data of INRA-156 strain, INRA-171 strain and INRA-171cFgVe1 strain, of which the FgVe1 allele has been replaced by the allelic version of INRA-156 strain. a. TCTB production measured from in vitro cultures. b. Conidia production from in vitro cultures. c. Fungal biomass production from in vitro culture. d. Pictures of strains grown on PDA medium
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/3v4ej7
title: Figure 2.jpg

description: Basic statistics of the traits in the progeny and distribution of the different phenotypes assayed in the offspring during the first trial. Spearman rank order correlation coefficient between the two trial is in bold for each traits, * means p-value 0.01. Black triangle and grey triangle show the INRA-171 and INRA-156ΔMat values for the trait respectively.
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/9j9it6
title: Table 2.docx

description: QTL associated with phenotype variation under experiment condition and mapping of the morphological Mendelian trait.
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/fnz11u
title: Figure 4.jpg

description: Analytical process of the in silico analysis of the genomic region of interest.
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/ftgsqx
title: Figure 5.jpg

description: Identification of the causal mutation. A. Representation of the FgVe1 (FGRRES_11955) protein sequence (in amino-acids number) and location and length of the predicted “Velvet domain” (Accession PS51821, Interpro ID: IPR037525) in green. B. Alignment of the protein sequence at the mutation position for the reference genome sequence (* PH-1 strain), for the INRA-156ΔMat and the INRA-171 strain. C. Three-dimensional prediction of the FgVe1 protein and location of the point mutation (dark arrow) on the alpha-loop domain.
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/i15iy6
title: Figure 1.jpg

description: Phenotypic characteristics of INRA-156, INRA-156ΔMat (parental strain), and INRA-171 (parental strain). a. Disease severity (infected spikelet / total spikelet number) measured at 22 days post inoculation (dpi). b. Trichothecene of type B quantification in µg of mycotoxin per gram of dried spike. c. Pictures of Royssac variety wheat spikes inoculated with INRA-171, INRA-156 or INRA-156ΔMat strains. d. Pictures of the strains grown of PDA medium.
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/jxdthw
title: Laurent_et_al_preprint.docx

description: Manuscript supporting the study
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/k62uuc
title: Supplemental exp procedure.tab

description: Kasp assay procedure
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/ksgzgw
title: Table 1.docx

description: Analyses of variance and heritability estimates (h²) for the aggressiveness-related traits measured in planta and in vitro from combined experiment data (two experiments per trait).
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/mbnexh
title: QTLmapping_Rqtl.r

description: Script R used during QTL analysis
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/mlgoat
title: Supplemental file 3.tab

description: phenotypic and genotypic data formatted for R/qtl analysis
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/phvoik
title: Laurent_et_al_preprint.docx

description: Manuscript associated to this work.
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/qrblca
title: Supplemental File 2.tab

description: Result from the analytical process proposed in Figure 4 and aiming to identify the candidate gene underlying the QTL. A) Genes located in the confidence interval of the QTL. B) Annotation of the polymorphism between the two parental stains inside the QTL region.
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/qw8kr9
title: Supplemental file 3.tab

description: phenotypic and genotypic data formatted for R/qtl analysis
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/vmoezj
title: Supplemental file 1.tab

description: A. Phenotypic statistics and correlation between trials and traits. B. Distribution of the different phenotypes assayed in the offspring during the second trial. Dark triangle and grey triangle show the INRA-171 and INRA-156ΔMat value for the trait respectively. C. Principal component analysis for the different traits. D. QTL detection for the different traits measured.
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/xa9mmy
title: Supplemental file 1.tab

description: A. Phenotypic statistics and correlation between trials and traits. B. Distribution of the different phenotypes assayed in the offspring during the second trial. Dark triangle and grey triangle show the INRA-171 and INRA-156ΔMat value for the trait respectively. C. Principal component analysis for the different traits. D. QTL detection for the different traits measured.
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/zqxkqm
title: Supplemental File 2.tab

description: Result from the analytical process proposed in Figure 4 and aiming to identify the candidate gene underlying the QTL. A) Genes located in the confidence interval of the QTL. B) Annotation of the polymorphism between the two parental stains inside the QTL region.
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/zuqfsw
title: Figure 3.jpg

description: PCA graph of variables (a.) and of individuals (b.) of the first phenotyping trial data.
DOI: 10.15454/irkfhm/zybac5
title: Figure 1.jpg

description: Phenotypic characteristics of INRA-156, INRA-156ΔMat (parental strain), and INRA-171 (parental strain). a. Disease severity (infected spikelet / total spikelet number) measured at 22 days post inoculation (dpi). b. Trichothecene of type B quantification in µg of mycotoxin per gram of dried spike. c. Pictures of Royssac variety wheat flowers inoculated with INRA-171,INRA-156 or INRA-156ΔMat strains. d. Pictures of the strains grown of PDA medium.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.16619773.v27
title: Data from "Notch-dependent and -independent transcription are modulated by tissue movements at gastrulation"

description: Data from "Levels of Notch-regulated transcription are modulated by tissue movements at gastrulation":<br>- raw MS2 Live imaging movies: 124 '.lif' files captured in a Leica SP8 confocal. Each is a 1-2h movie of a developing fly embryo in the genetic condition described in the file name. The metadata file contains the information linking each movie with parameters used for image analysis and identifier of the genetic condition ("nickname" column).<br>- data obtained from image analysis: '.mat' files obtained from MATLAB after image analysis for each movie. README contains information of the data structure and all variables stored in each.<br>- numerical data used for figures: text files containing data points used in all figures in the paper. "NumericalData.txt" contains the information about each plot, axes, figure where it's used and name of the file containing the numerical data.