cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524369
title: Appendix B. An explanation of parameter estimates and diagnostic statistics for generalized linear models used to estimate relative abundance.

description: An explanation of parameter estimates and diagnostic statistics for generalized linear models used to estimate relative abundance.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524369.v1
title: Appendix B. An explanation of parameter estimates and diagnostic statistics for generalized linear models used to estimate relative abundance.

description: An explanation of parameter estimates and diagnostic statistics for generalized linear models used to estimate relative abundance.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524366
title: Appendix A. A matrix-algebraic presentation of the concepts and computations.

description: A matrix-algebraic presentation of the concepts and computations.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524366.v1
title: Appendix A. A matrix-algebraic presentation of the concepts and computations.

description: A matrix-algebraic presentation of the concepts and computations.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524363
title: Appendix A. A figure presenting the cubic polynomial trend surface used in simulations to generate the values of X2, an unmeasured nonhabitat variable.

description: A figure presenting the cubic polynomial trend surface used in simulations to generate the values of X2, an unmeasured nonhabitat variable.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524363.v1
title: Appendix A. A figure presenting the cubic polynomial trend surface used in simulations to generate the values of X2, an unmeasured nonhabitat variable.

description: A figure presenting the cubic polynomial trend surface used in simulations to generate the values of X2, an unmeasured nonhabitat variable.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524360
title: Spike, burst and network spike data files generated using the IGM.MEA analysis package - experiment 1 (Figure 3, Sup Fig S1 and S2).

description: Files in this zip folder are those generated after spikelist files were run through the analysis pipeline. These files are those used to generate figures (Figure 3, Supplemental Fig S1, and Supplemental Figure S2) presented in the manuscript.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524360.v1
title: New draft item

description: Files in this zip folder are those generated after spikelist files were run through the analysis pipeline. These files are those used to generate figures presented in the manuscript.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524360.v3
title: Spike, burst and network spike data files generated using the IGM.MEA analysis package - experiment 1 (Figure 3, Sup Fig S1 and S2).

description: Files in this zip folder are those generated after spikelist files were run through the analysis pipeline. These files are those used to generate figures (Figure 3, Supplemental Fig S1, and Supplemental Figure S2) presented in the manuscript.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524360.v2
title: Data Files Associated with Experiment 1

description: Files in this zip folder are those generated after spikelist files were run through the analysis pipeline. These files are those used to generate figures (Figure 3, Supplemental Fig S1, and Supplemental Figure S2) presented in the manuscript.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524357
title: Appendix B. The performance of regression quantile rank score tests for models with hidden bias.

description: The performance of regression quantile rank score tests for models with hidden bias.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524357.v1
title: Appendix B. The performance of regression quantile rank score tests for models with hidden bias.

description: The performance of regression quantile rank score tests for models with hidden bias.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524354
title: Appendix C. Model selection criteria.

description: Model selection criteria.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524354.v1
title: Appendix C. Model selection criteria.

description: Model selection criteria.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524351
title: Appendix D. The method used for estimating local quantile weights.

description: The method used for estimating local quantile weights.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524351.v1
title: Appendix D. The method used for estimating local quantile weights.

description: The method used for estimating local quantile weights.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524348
title: Supplement 1. Bivalve data (Legendre et al. 1997) used for example application.

description: File List bivalve.txt Description The ASCII text data frame bivalve.txt contains 200 rows of observations corresponding to the 0.25 square meter sample plots on a 250 m × 500 m area on the sandflat of Wiroa Island, Manukau Harbor, New Zealand (data from Legendre et al. 1997). The 21 column variables are: LN.MACG15, logarithm of counts of <i>Macomona</i> &gt;15 mm; MACG15, counts of <i>Macomona</i> &gt;15 mm; ELEV.M, bed elevation in meters above chart datum; ELEV2, ELEV.M squared; ELEV3, ELEV.M cubed; X.CTR, longitude coordinates centered to mean 0; Y.CTR, latitude coordinates centered to mean 0; X2, X.CTR squared; XY, X.CTR multiplied by Y.CTR; Y2, Y.CTR squared; X3, X.CTR cubed; X2Y, X2 multiplied by Y.CTR; XY2, X.CTR multiplied by Y2; Y3, Y.CTR cubed; EBBSTRESS, ebb tide bed shear stress (N/m<sup>2</sup>); SWWAVEWORK, southwest wave work per unit of bed area (kg/s<sup>2</sup>); WSWWAVEWORK, west, southwest wave work per unit of bed area (kg/s<sup>2</sup>); WATER.G20CM, proportion of time the plot is covered by water &gt;20 cm deep during spring tide (0 - 1); LRGWAVE.STIR, proportion of time large waves stir the plot during spring tide (0 - 1); FLDSTRESS, flood tide bed shear stress (N/m<sup>2</sup>); and SHELLHASH, bivalve shell hash (g) in the bed sediment. Missing values are indicated by NA.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524348.v1
title: Supplement 1. Bivalve data (Legendre et al. 1997) used for example application.

description: File List bivalve.txt Description The ASCII text data frame bivalve.txt contains 200 rows of observations corresponding to the 0.25 square meter sample plots on a 250 m × 500 m area on the sandflat of Wiroa Island, Manukau Harbor, New Zealand (data from Legendre et al. 1997). The 21 column variables are: LN.MACG15, logarithm of counts of <i>Macomona</i> &gt;15 mm; MACG15, counts of <i>Macomona</i> &gt;15 mm; ELEV.M, bed elevation in meters above chart datum; ELEV2, ELEV.M squared; ELEV3, ELEV.M cubed; X.CTR, longitude coordinates centered to mean 0; Y.CTR, latitude coordinates centered to mean 0; X2, X.CTR squared; XY, X.CTR multiplied by Y.CTR; Y2, Y.CTR squared; X3, X.CTR cubed; X2Y, X2 multiplied by Y.CTR; XY2, X.CTR multiplied by Y2; Y3, Y.CTR cubed; EBBSTRESS, ebb tide bed shear stress (N/m<sup>2</sup>); SWWAVEWORK, southwest wave work per unit of bed area (kg/s<sup>2</sup>); WSWWAVEWORK, west, southwest wave work per unit of bed area (kg/s<sup>2</sup>); WATER.G20CM, proportion of time the plot is covered by water &gt;20 cm deep during spring tide (0 - 1); LRGWAVE.STIR, proportion of time large waves stir the plot during spring tide (0 - 1); FLDSTRESS, flood tide bed shear stress (N/m<sup>2</sup>); and SHELLHASH, bivalve shell hash (g) in the bed sediment. Missing values are indicated by NA.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524345
title: Appendix A. A determination of minimal adequate models.

description: A determination of minimal adequate models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524345.v1
title: Appendix A. A determination of minimal adequate models.

description: A determination of minimal adequate models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524342
title: Appendix B. A determination of net effects from minimal adequate models.

description: A determination of net effects from minimal adequate models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524342.v1
title: Appendix B. A determination of net effects from minimal adequate models.

description: A determination of net effects from minimal adequate models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524339
title: Appendix C. Overview of species used in the analyses with an indication of their status and frequency of occurrence in sampled plots.

description: Overview of species used in the analyses with an indication of their status and frequency of occurrence in sampled plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524339.v1
title: Appendix C. Overview of species used in the analyses with an indication of their status and frequency of occurrence in sampled plots.

description: Overview of species used in the analyses with an indication of their status and frequency of occurrence in sampled plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524336
title: Appendix D. Overall significance and variation explained by minimal adequate models.

description: Overall significance and variation explained by minimal adequate models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524333
title: Appendix E. Comparison of the number of archaeophytes, neophytes, and native species in different crop types.

description: Comparison of the number of archaeophytes, neophytes, and native species in different crop types.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524333.v1
title: Appendix E. Comparison of the number of archaeophytes, neophytes, and native species in different crop types.

description: Comparison of the number of archaeophytes, neophytes, and native species in different crop types.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524330
title: Appendix F. Comparison of different crops in terms of the proportional numbers of archaeophytes, neophytes, and native species.

description: Comparison of different crops in terms of the proportional numbers of archaeophytes, neophytes, and native species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524327
title: Appendix A. A figure showing species composition of bumble bee visitors to Mimulus ringens and Lobelia siphilitica in the experimental arrays.

description: A figure showing species composition of bumble bee visitors to Mimulus ringens and Lobelia siphilitica in the experimental arrays.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524327.v1
title: Appendix A. A figure showing species composition of bumble bee visitors to Mimulus ringens and Lobelia siphilitica in the experimental arrays.

description: A figure showing species composition of bumble bee visitors to Mimulus ringens and Lobelia siphilitica in the experimental arrays.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524324
title: Appendix B. A table showing results of a split-plot ANOVA for pollinator visitation as a function of Treatment, Day, and Array(trt).

description: A table showing results of a split-plot ANOVA for pollinator visitation as a function of Treatment, Day, and Array(trt).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524324.v1
title: Appendix B. A table showing results of a split-plot ANOVA for pollinator visitation as a function of Treatment, Day, and Array(trt).

description: A table showing results of a split-plot ANOVA for pollinator visitation as a function of Treatment, Day, and Array(trt).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524321
title: Appendix C. A figure showing the number of consecutively probed flowers on individual Mimulus plants in the pure-species and mixed-species arrays.

description: A figure showing the number of consecutively probed flowers on individual Mimulus plants in the pure-species and mixed-species arrays.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524321.v1
title: Appendix C. A figure showing the number of consecutively probed flowers on individual Mimulus plants in the pure-species and mixed-species arrays.

description: A figure showing the number of consecutively probed flowers on individual Mimulus plants in the pure-species and mixed-species arrays.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524318
title: Appendix A. The model factorization.

description: The model factorization.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524318.v1
title: Appendix A. The model factorization.

description: The model factorization.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524315
title: Appendix B. The calculation of growth rates.

description: The calculation of growth rates.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524315.v1
title: Appendix B. The calculation of growth rates.

description: The calculation of growth rates.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524312
title: Appendix C. The observation model.

description: The observation model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524312.v1
title: Appendix C. The observation model.

description: The observation model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524309
title: Appendix D. A description of the prior distributions.

description: A description of the prior distributions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524309.v1
title: Appendix D. A description of the prior distributions.

description: A description of the prior distributions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524306
title: Appendix E. A description of the Markov chain Monte Carlo implementation.

description: A description of the Markov chain Monte Carlo implementation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524306.v1
title: Appendix E. A description of the Markov chain Monte Carlo implementation.

description: A description of the Markov chain Monte Carlo implementation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524303
title: Appendix F. The posterior distributions.

description: The posterior distributions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524303.v1
title: Appendix F. The posterior distributions.

description: The posterior distributions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524300
title: Appendix G. Sensitivity analyses.

description: Sensitivity analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524300.v1
title: Appendix G. Sensitivity analyses.

description: Sensitivity analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524297
title: Appendix H. References cited in the appendices.

description: References cited in the appendices.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524297.v1
title: Appendix H. References cited in the appendices.

description: References cited in the appendices.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524291
title: Appendix A. Species composition of treatments a–z.

description: Species composition of treatments a–z.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524288
title: Appendix A. A table showing the estimates of the population parameters.

description: A table showing the estimates of the population parameters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524288.v1
title: Appendix A. A table showing the estimates of the population parameters.

description: A table showing the estimates of the population parameters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524285
title: Appendix A. Results of a mixed-model ANOVA testing the effects of breeding state (breeder vs. nonbreeder), experience (inexperienced vs. experienced), year, and their interactions on body mass of Blue Petrels.

description: Results of a mixed-model ANOVA testing the effects of breeding state (breeder vs. nonbreeder), experience (inexperienced vs. experienced), year, and their interactions on body mass of Blue Petrels.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524285.v1
title: Appendix A. Results of a mixed-model ANOVA testing the effects of breeding state (breeder vs. nonbreeder), experience (inexperienced vs. experienced), year, and their interactions on body mass of Blue Petrels.

description: Results of a mixed-model ANOVA testing the effects of breeding state (breeder vs. nonbreeder), experience (inexperienced vs. experienced), year, and their interactions on body mass of Blue Petrels.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524282
title: Appendix B. Variation in the mean body condition (± SE) of (a) experienced breeders and first-time breeders and (b) experienced nonbreeders and inexperienced nonbreeders across years.

description: Variation in the mean body condition (± SE) of (a) experienced breeders and first-time breeders and (b) experienced nonbreeders and inexperienced nonbreeders across years.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524282.v1
title: Appendix B. Variation in the mean body condition (± SE) of (a) experienced breeders and first-time breeders and (b) experienced nonbreeders and inexperienced nonbreeders across years.

description: Variation in the mean body condition (± SE) of (a) experienced breeders and first-time breeders and (b) experienced nonbreeders and inexperienced nonbreeders across years.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524279
title: Appendix A. A table showing structural characteristics of stands sampled in four age classes.

description: A table showing structural characteristics of stands sampled in four age classes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524279.v1
title: Appendix A. A table showing structural characteristics of stands sampled in four age classes.

description: A table showing structural characteristics of stands sampled in four age classes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524276
title: Appendix B. A figure showing stem maps for two selected stands of similar age (130yr) but contrasting density.

description: A figure showing stem maps for two selected stands of similar age (130yr) but contrasting density.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524276.v1
title: Appendix B. A figure showing stem maps for two selected stands of similar age (130yr) but contrasting density.

description: A figure showing stem maps for two selected stands of similar age (130yr) but contrasting density.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524273
title: Appendix C. A discussion of potential error sources in age estimation, a figure showing stand maps of two stands within 10×50 m plots, a table showing canopy characteristics for five selected young dense stands, and associated literature cited.

description: A discussion of potential error sources in age estimation, a figure showing stand maps of two stands within 10×50 m plots, a table showing canopy characteristics for five selected young dense stands, and associated literature cited.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524273.v1
title: Appendix C. A discussion of potential error sources in age estimation, a figure showing stand maps of two stands within 10×50 m plots, a table showing canopy characteristics for five selected young dense stands, and associated literature cited.

description: A discussion of potential error sources in age estimation, a figure showing stand maps of two stands within 10×50 m plots, a table showing canopy characteristics for five selected young dense stands, and associated literature cited.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524270
title: Appendix D. A table showing mean values of the Palmer Drought Severity Index for the Yellowstone region for each of the 5-yr periods over which ring widths were regressed against stand density.

description: A table showing mean values of the Palmer Drought Severity Index for the Yellowstone region for each of the 5-yr periods over which ring widths were regressed against stand density.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524270.v1
title: Appendix D. A table showing mean values of the Palmer Drought Severity Index for the Yellowstone region for each of the 5-yr periods over which ring widths were regressed against stand density.

description: A table showing mean values of the Palmer Drought Severity Index for the Yellowstone region for each of the 5-yr periods over which ring widths were regressed against stand density.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524267
title: Appendix E. A figure showing age class distributions for stands sampled in Yellowstone National Park.

description: A figure showing age class distributions for stands sampled in Yellowstone National Park.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524267.v1
title: Appendix E. A figure showing age class distributions for stands sampled in Yellowstone National Park.

description: A figure showing age class distributions for stands sampled in Yellowstone National Park.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524264
title: Appendix F. A table showing results of transformed Ripley's K(L-hat) analyses for tree spatial pattern before and after mortality for stands sampled across four age classes in Yellowstone National Park.

description: A table showing results of transformed Ripley's K(L-hat) analyses for tree spatial pattern before and after mortality for stands sampled across four age classes in Yellowstone National Park.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524264.v1
title: Appendix F. A table showing results of transformed Ripley's K(L-hat) analyses for tree spatial pattern before and after mortality for stands sampled across four age classes in Yellowstone National Park.

description: A table showing results of transformed Ripley's K(L-hat) analyses for tree spatial pattern before and after mortality for stands sampled across four age classes in Yellowstone National Park.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524261
title: Supplement 1. Source code for simulations described in our paper.

description: File List underwood_et_al_code.c<br> Description The program underwood_et_al_code.c simulates the movement of herbivores and plant responses to herbivores on a linear array of plants, and records the location of herbivores and status of the plants. Options within the code allow for changing the initial distribution of herbivores among plants. All variables and options are explained by comments within the code, immediately following their first usage.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524261.v1
title: Supplement 1. Source code for simulations described in our paper.

description: File List underwood_et_al_code.c<br> Description The program underwood_et_al_code.c simulates the movement of herbivores and plant responses to herbivores on a linear array of plants, and records the location of herbivores and status of the plants. Options within the code allow for changing the initial distribution of herbivores among plants. All variables and options are explained by comments within the code, immediately following their first usage.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524258
title: Appendix A. A table presenting ANOVA results for each plant species of the main effects of location, time, and their interaction on the total percentage of vegetative herbivory observed.

description: A table presenting ANOVA results for each plant species of the main effects of location, time, and their interaction on the total percentage of vegetative herbivory observed.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524255
title: Appendix A. A description of age-depth models.

description: A description of age-depth models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524255.v1
title: Appendix A. A description of age-depth models.

description: A description of age-depth models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524252
title: Appendix A. A table showing information on species for which quantitative thermoregulatory data were available to test the cost–benefit model of thermoregulation.

description: A table showing information on species for which quantitative thermoregulatory data were available to test the cost–benefit model of thermoregulation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524252.v1
title: Appendix A. A table showing information on species for which quantitative thermoregulatory data were available to test the cost–benefit model of thermoregulation.

description: A table showing information on species for which quantitative thermoregulatory data were available to test the cost–benefit model of thermoregulation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524249
title: Appendix B. A list of references used in the construction of the phylogenetic tree of study species (Appendix D) necessary for the calculation of phylogenetically independent contrasts used to test the cost–benefit model of thermoregulation.

description: A list of references used in the construction of the phylogenetic tree of study species (Appendix D) necessary for the calculation of phylogenetically independent contrasts used to test the cost–benefit model of thermoregulation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524249.v1
title: Appendix B. A list of references used in the construction of the phylogenetic tree of study species (Appendix D) necessary for the calculation of phylogenetically independent contrasts used to test the cost–benefit model of thermoregulation.

description: A list of references used in the construction of the phylogenetic tree of study species (Appendix D) necessary for the calculation of phylogenetically independent contrasts used to test the cost–benefit model of thermoregulation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3524246
title: Appendix C. A figure showing world distribution of locations where thermoregulation was studied quantitatively, allowing a test of the cost–benefit model of thermoregulation.

description: A figure showing world distribution of locations where thermoregulation was studied quantitatively, allowing a test of the cost–benefit model of thermoregulation.