DOI: 10.3886/icpsr36696
title: Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Sexual Misconduct, 2010-2015
title: Archival Version

description: The Association of American Universities (AAU) Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Sexual Misconduct developed and implemented a scientific survey to better understand the attitudes and experiences of students with respect to sexual assault and sexual misconduct. The survey's primary goal was to provide participating institutions of higher education (IHEs) with information to inform their policies to prevent and respond to sexual assault and misconduct. Specifically, the survey assessed the incidence, prevalence, and characteristics of incidents of sexual assault and misconduct. It also assessed the overall campus climate with respect to perceptions of risk, knowledge of resources available to victims, and perceived reactions to an incident of sexual assault or misconduct. The goal of the study was to provide policymakers with information that could be used to develop programs to prevent sexual violence in the future.
description: The Association of American Universities (AAU) Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Sexual Misconduct was designed to collect a significant amount of detail on a wide range of victimizations, including harassment, stalking, intimate partner violence (IPV), and various forms of nonconsensual sexual contact (NSC). This involved asking respondents not only about the occurrence of particular types of victimization, but also for incident-level details about what happened.
description: The Association of American Universities (AAU) contracted with Westat, a research firm, to work with a university team of researchers and administrators to design and implement the survey. The survey was developed by a group of researchers, program administrators, and methodologists from the participating institutes of higher education (IHEs) and the Westat Team. The design team started with the survey instrument developed by the White House Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault and adapted the design around the informational needs of the participating IHEs. When asking about sexual assault and sexual misconduct, the questions used descriptions of specific types of behaviors and tactics that constitute sexual assault and misconduct. Words such as "rape" and "assault" were specifically avoided so that respondents would use a set of uniform definitions when reporting on the types of events that were of interest.During a 4-month period, comments from participating IHEs were reviewed, two rounds of cognitive interviews were conducted and pilot administrations were conducted at four participating IHEs. The survey was then administered at the 27 participating IHEs. For 26 of the 27 schools, all enrolled undergraduates, graduate, and professional students 18 years and older were asked to participate.
description: The survey structure is made up of 10 sections (A-J). A core set of 53 questions was asked of every respondent, including Background (A), Perceptions of Risk (B), Resources (C), Harassment (D), Stalking (E), Sexual Violence (G), Sexual Misconduct Prevention Training (H), Perceptions of Responses to Reporting (I), and Bystander Behavior (J). Questions regarding Sexual Misconduct Prevention Training (H) were asked of students who had enrolled in the university in 2014 or 2015. Respondents in a partnered relationship or who had been in a partnered relationship since enrolling at the university were asked questions about Intimate Partner Violence/Domestic Violence (F). Additional questions were administered if respondents reported being a victim of one of the types of violence covered on the survey. For Harassment, Stalking, and Intimate Partner Violence/Domestic Violence (sections D, E and F), follow-up questions were asked for each type of misconduct. These follow-up questions collected information across all reported incidents for each form of victimization.
description: The data contain a final calibrated weight variable and 60 replicate weight variables. The data were weighted to adjust for differential nonresponse among the institutions of higher education. A second data file contains replicate weight factors for use with survey procedures that utilize replicate weights for variance estimation. In addition each estimate is accompanied by a standard error. The standard errors were calculated using the jackknife replication. This accounts for the weighting procedures and a finite correction factor.
description: Response Rates: The sample size was 779,170. The final response rate of this sample was 19.3 percent. This rate varied by gender (males 15.6%, females 22.9%) and enrollment status (17.4% undergraduates, 23.2% graduate/professional). The difference between the incentive and the non-incentive conditions was approximately 9 percentage points (25.8% vs. 16.5%). Private institutes of higher education (IHEs) had a response rate of 34.2 percent and public IHEs had a response rate of 16.5 percent.
description: Presence of Common Scales: The AAU in some instances uses preexisting scales. Specifically the AAU survey measure of sexual harassment used portions of the Leskinen and Cortina (2014) scale representing each of the major dimensions they describe: 1) sexist remarks, 2) sexually crude/offensive behavior, 3) infantilization, 4) work/family policing, and 5) gender policing. Also several Likert-type scales were used to reflect items that range from Not at all to Extremely 0 times to 10 or more times 1 time to 4 or more times Excellent to poor
description: In total 27 institutes of higher learning were sampled. Of the schools sampled most schools observed a 3-week field period, with three email requests sent out asking for student participation. To encourage participation, students were offered a variety of incentives. In 18 schools, students were either entered into a drawing or offered a $5 incentive to complete the survey. Some schools offered a variation on this basic design. Other schools offered an incentive to all students, while a few offered no incentive. For 26 of the 27 schools, all enrolled undergraduates, graduate, and professional students 18 years and older were asked to participate. The sample size was 779,170. Of the total sample, 196,984 clicked on the link to the survey. Of those who clicked on the link, 169,486 started the survey.
description: Datasets: DS0: Study-Level Files DS1: Campus Climate Survey DS2: Campus Climate Survey Weights
description: Undergraduate, graduate, and professional students of 27 institutions of higher education. Smallest Geographic Unit: State
description: web-based survey