DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.829920
title: Biolinks, Datasets And Algorithms Supporting Semantic-Based Distribution And Similarity For Scientific Publications

description: <strong>Background: </strong>Finding articles related to a publication of interest remains a challenge in the Life Sciences domain as the number of scientific publications grows day by day. Publication repositories such as PubMed and Elsevier provides a list of similar articles. There, similarity is commonly calculated based on title, abstract and some keywords assigned to articles. Here we present the datasets and algorithms used in Biolinks. Biolinks uses ontological concepts extracted from publication and makes it possible to calculate a distribution score according to semantic groups as well as a semantic similarity based on either all identified annotations or narrowed to one or more particular semantic groups. Biolinks supports both title and abstract only as well as full-text.

<strong>Materials: </strong>In a previous work [1], 4,240 articles from the TREC-05 collection [2] were selected. The title-and-abstract for those 4,240 articles were annotated with Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) concepts, such annotations are refer to as our TA-dataset and correspond to the JSON files under the pubmed folder in the JSON-LD.zip file. From those 4,240 articles, full-text was available for only 62. The title-and-abstract annotations for those 62 articles, TAFT-dataset, are located under the pubmed-pmc folder in the JSON-LD.zip file, which also contains the full-text annotations under the folder pmc, FT-dataset. The list corresponding to articles with title-and-abstract is found in the genomics.qrels.large.pubmed.onlyRelevants.titleAndAbstract.tsv file, while those with full-text are recorded in the genomics.qrels.large.pmc.onlyRelevants.fullContent.tsv file.

Here we include the annotations on title and abstract as well as those for full-text for all our datasets (profiles.zip). We also provide the global similarity matrices (similarity.zip).

<strong>Methods:</strong> The TA-dataset was used to calculate the Information Gain (IG) according to the UMLS semantic groups, see IG_umls_groups.PMID.xlsx. A new grouping is proposed for Biolinks, see biolinks_groups.tsv. The IG was calculated for Biolinks groups as well, IG_biolinks_groups.PMID.xlsx, showing a improvement around 5%.

In order to assess the similarity metric regarding the cohesion of TREC-05 groups, we used Silhouette Coefficient analyses. An additional dataset Stem-TAFT-dataset was used and compared to TAFT and FT datasets.

Biolinks groups were used to calculate a semantic group distribution score for each article in all our datasets. A semantic similarity metric based on PubMed related articles [3] is also provided; the Biolinks groups can be used to narrow the similarity to one or more selected groups. All the corresponding algorithms are open-access and available on GitHub under the license Apache-2.0, a frozen version, biotea-io-parser-master.zip, is provided here. In order to facilitate the analysis of our datasets based on the annotations as well as the distribution and similarity scores, some web-based visualization components were created. All of them open-access and available in GitHub under the license Apache-2.0; frozen versions are provided here, see files biotea-vis-annotation-master.zip, biotea-vis-similarity-master.zip, biotea-vis-tooltip-master.zip and biotea-vis-topicDistribution-master.zip. These components are brought together by biotea-vis-biolinks-master.zip. A demo is provided at http://ljgarcia.github.io/biotea-biolinks/; this demo was built on top of GitHub pages, a frozen version of the gh-pages branch is provided here, see biotea-biolinks-gh-pages.zip.

<strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biolinks assigns a weight to each semantic group based on the annotations extracted from either title-and-abstract or full-text articles. It also measures similarity for a pair of documents using the semantic information. The distribution and similarity metrics can be narrowed to a subset of the semantic groups, enabling researchers to focus on what is more relevant to them.

 

[1] Garcia Castro, L.J., R. Berlanga, and A. Garcia, <em>In the pursuit of a semantic similarity metric based on UMLS annotations for articles in PubMed Central Open Access.</em> Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2015. <strong>57</strong>: p. 204-218

[2] Text Retrieval Conference 2005 - Genomics Track. <em>TREC-05 Genomics Track ad hoc relevance judgement</em>. 2005  [cited 2016 23rd August]; Available from: http://trec.nist.gov/data/genomics/05/genomics.qrels.large.txt

[3] Lin, J. and W.J. Wilbur, <em>PubMed related articles: a probabilistic topic-based model for content similarity.</em> BMC Bioinformatics, 2007. <strong>8</strong>(1): p. 423
description: {"references": ["Garcia Castro, L.J., R. Berlanga, and A. Garcia, In the pursuit of a semantic similarity metric based on UMLS annotations for articles in PubMed Central Open Access. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2015. 57: p. 204-218", "Text Retrieval Conference 2005 - Genomics Track. TREC-05 Genomics Track ad hoc relevance judgement. 2005  [cited 2016 23rd August]; Available from: http://trec.nist.gov/data/genomics/05/genomics.qrels.large.txt", "Lin, J. and W.J. Wilbur, PubMed related articles: a probabilistic topic-based model for content similarity. BMC Bioinformatics, 2007. 8(1): p. 423"]}