cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516806.v1
title: Appendix A. List of aquatic plant species in Doñana (SW Spain) considered in the study.

description: List of aquatic plant species in Doñana (SW Spain) considered in the study.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516803
title: Appendix B. Questionnaire.

description: Questionnaire.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516803.v1
title: Appendix B. Questionnaire.

description: Questionnaire.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516800
title: Appendix C. Functional groups obtained through the non hierarchical cluster classification of aquatic plants based on trait attributes.

description: Functional groups obtained through the non hierarchical cluster classification of aquatic plants based on trait attributes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516797
title: Appendix D. Factor loadings derived from principal component analysis (PCA) to characterize ecosystem service providers (ESPs).

description: Factor loadings derived from principal component analysis (PCA) to characterize ecosystem service providers (ESPs).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516800.v1
title: Appendix C. Functional groups obtained through the non hierarchical cluster classification of aquatic plants based on trait attributes.

description: Functional groups obtained through the non hierarchical cluster classification of aquatic plants based on trait attributes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516797.v1
title: Appendix D. Factor loadings derived from principal component analysis (PCA) to characterize ecosystem service providers (ESPs).

description: Factor loadings derived from principal component analysis (PCA) to characterize ecosystem service providers (ESPs).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516794
title: Appendix E. Factor loadings derived from principal component analysis (PCA) to characterize ecosystem service beneficiaries (ESBs).

description: Factor loadings derived from principal component analysis (PCA) to characterize ecosystem service beneficiaries (ESBs).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516791
title: Appendix F. Factor loadings derived from canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) for relationships between ecosystem service beneficiaries (ESBs) and their willingness to pay (WTP) for the ecosystem service delivery by ecosystem service providers (ESPs) and the ESPs themselves.

description: Factor loadings derived from canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) for relationships between ecosystem service beneficiaries (ESBs) and their willingness to pay (WTP) for the ecosystem service delivery by ecosystem service providers (ESPs) and the ESPs themselves.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516791.v1
title: Appendix F. Factor loadings derived from canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) for relationships between ecosystem service beneficiaries (ESBs) and their willingness to pay (WTP) for the ecosystem service delivery by ecosystem service providers (ESPs) and the ESPs themselves.

description: Factor loadings derived from canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) for relationships between ecosystem service beneficiaries (ESBs) and their willingness to pay (WTP) for the ecosystem service delivery by ecosystem service providers (ESPs) and the ESPs themselves.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516788
title: Appendix A. Detailed description of methods for estimating empirical critical loads of nitrogen.

description: Detailed description of methods for estimating empirical critical loads of nitrogen.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516788.v1
title: Appendix A. Detailed description of methods for estimating empirical critical loads of nitrogen.

description: Detailed description of methods for estimating empirical critical loads of nitrogen.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516785
title: Appendix A. Details of the sources of data for and models of flow and temperature.

description: Details of the sources of data for and models of flow and temperature.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516785.v1
title: Appendix A. Details of the sources of data for and models of flow and temperature.

description: Details of the sources of data for and models of flow and temperature.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516782
title: Appendix B. Figure showing the effect of choice of temperature cost function on modeled smolt survival.

description: Figure showing the effect of choice of temperature cost function on modeled smolt survival.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516782.v1
title: Appendix B. Figure showing the effect of choice of temperature cost function on modeled smolt survival.

description: Figure showing the effect of choice of temperature cost function on modeled smolt survival.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516779
title: Appendix C. Table of data for modeled tributaries, including distance from mouth and relative proportion of smolts originating from each.

description: Table of data for modeled tributaries, including distance from mouth and relative proportion of smolts originating from each.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516779.v1
title: Appendix C. Table of data for modeled tributaries, including distance from mouth and relative proportion of smolts originating from each.

description: Table of data for modeled tributaries, including distance from mouth and relative proportion of smolts originating from each.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516773
title: Supplement 1. Interpolated data used to model current velocity and river temperature.

description: File List Flow_data.csv<br> Temperature_data.csv Description Flow_data.csv contains the comma-separated data used to model current velocity. It contains velocity (km/d) for each River Mile (rm, Column 1) and the corresponding River Kilometer (rk, Column 2), for each day April 1–June 30 (day 1–91, Column 3), for each of 10 years, 1993–2002 (Columns 4–13), and the mean velocity at that river mile and day over ten years (avg, Column 14). Checksum values are: Row 2, no missing values, checksum = 728.68<br> Row 25390, no missing values, checksum = 1041.92 Temperature_data.csv contains the comma-separated data used to model river temperature. It contains temperature (°C) at each River Mile (RM, Column 1) and the corresponding River Kilometer (RK. Column 2), for each day April 1–June 30 (day 1–91, Column 3), for each of 10 years, 1993–2002 (Columns 4–13). Checksum values are: Row 2, no missing values, checksum = 56.14<br> Row 25390, no missing values, checksum = 1011.41
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516773.v1
title: Supplement 1. Interpolated data used to model current velocity and river temperature.

description: File List Flow_data.csv<br> Temperature_data.csv Description Flow_data.csv contains the comma-separated data used to model current velocity. It contains velocity (km/d) for each River Mile (rm, Column 1) and the corresponding River Kilometer (rk, Column 2), for each day April 1–June 30 (day 1–91, Column 3), for each of 10 years, 1993–2002 (Columns 4–13), and the mean velocity at that river mile and day over ten years (avg, Column 14). Checksum values are: Row 2, no missing values, checksum = 728.68<br> Row 25390, no missing values, checksum = 1041.92 Temperature_data.csv contains the comma-separated data used to model river temperature. It contains temperature (°C) at each River Mile (RM, Column 1) and the corresponding River Kilometer (RK. Column 2), for each day April 1–June 30 (day 1–91, Column 3), for each of 10 years, 1993–2002 (Columns 4–13). Checksum values are: Row 2, no missing values, checksum = 56.14<br> Row 25390, no missing values, checksum = 1011.41
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516770
title: Appendix A. Predictor variables used in species distribution models.

description: Predictor variables used in species distribution models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516770.v1
title: Appendix A. Predictor variables used in species distribution models.

description: Predictor variables used in species distribution models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516767
title: Appendix B. Non-native species that were modeled with MARS, as well as species included as point occurrences in Zonation.

description: Non-native species that were modeled with MARS, as well as species included as point occurrences in Zonation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516767.v1
title: Appendix B. Non-native species that were modeled with MARS, as well as species included as point occurrences in Zonation.

description: Non-native species that were modeled with MARS, as well as species included as point occurrences in Zonation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516764
title: Appendix C. Methodological details of Zonation implementation.

description: Methodological details of Zonation implementation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516761
title: Appendix D. Native species traits used for calculations of functional diversity.

description: Native species traits used for calculations of functional diversity.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516761.v1
title: Appendix D. Native species traits used for calculations of functional diversity.

description: Native species traits used for calculations of functional diversity.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516758
title: Appendix E. Contemporary and future threats to native species persistence.

description: Contemporary and future threats to native species persistence.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516758.v1
title: Appendix E. Contemporary and future threats to native species persistence.

description: Contemporary and future threats to native species persistence.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516755
title: Appendix F. Conservation ranking (%) of the landscape averaged over taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity scenarios.

description: Conservation ranking (%) of the landscape averaged over taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity scenarios.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516755.v1
title: Appendix F. Conservation ranking (%) of the landscape averaged over taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity scenarios.

description: Conservation ranking (%) of the landscape averaged over taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity scenarios.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516752
title: Appendix G. Area of the top 10% of different conservation scenarios across future projected changes in temperature, precipitation, and impervious surface.

description: Area of the top 10% of different conservation scenarios across future projected changes in temperature, precipitation, and impervious surface.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516749
title: Appendix H. Changes in the proportion of species distribution that remain as planning units in the basin are removed.

description: Changes in the proportion of species distribution that remain as planning units in the basin are removed.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516752.v1
title: Appendix G. Area of the top 10% of different conservation scenarios across future projected changes in temperature, precipitation, and impervious surface.

description: Area of the top 10% of different conservation scenarios across future projected changes in temperature, precipitation, and impervious surface.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516749.v1
title: Appendix H. Changes in the proportion of species distribution that remain as planning units in the basin are removed.

description: Changes in the proportion of species distribution that remain as planning units in the basin are removed.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516746
title: Supplement 1. Taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic conservation priorities download for Google Earth.

description: File List LCRB Conservation Priorities - Fish Taxonomic Diversity.kmz<br> LCRB Conservation Priorities - Fish Functional Diversity.kmz<br> LCRB Conservation Priorities - Fish Phylogenetic Diversity.kmz Description To facilitate the usage of the results of our study by conservation practitioners, we have appended a file of taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic conservation priorities for the Lower Colorado River Basin (from Figure 1 of the manuscript) and instructions for viewing in Google Earth. <i>Instructions</i>:<br> 1. Download and install Google Earth (http://www.google.com/earth/index.html)<br> 2. Open Google Earth, navigate to File &gt; Open.<br> 3. Navigate to download location of .kmz file; select and click Open. Conservation priorities are displayed using the same color scheme and ranking as in Figure 1 of the manuscript. Clicking on catchments on the map will bring up the name of the river or stream assigned by the Geographic Names Information System ("GNIS_Name") and a ranking (e.g., "tax_rank" for taxonomic conservation priority).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516746.v1
title: Supplement 1. Taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic conservation priorities download for Google Earth.

description: File List LCRB Conservation Priorities - Fish Taxonomic Diversity.kmz<br> LCRB Conservation Priorities - Fish Functional Diversity.kmz<br> LCRB Conservation Priorities - Fish Phylogenetic Diversity.kmz Description To facilitate the usage of the results of our study by conservation practitioners, we have appended a file of taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic conservation priorities for the Lower Colorado River Basin (from Figure 1 of the manuscript) and instructions for viewing in Google Earth. <i>Instructions</i>:<br> 1. Download and install Google Earth (http://www.google.com/earth/index.html)<br> 2. Open Google Earth, navigate to File &gt; Open.<br> 3. Navigate to download location of .kmz file; select and click Open. Conservation priorities are displayed using the same color scheme and ranking as in Figure 1 of the manuscript. Clicking on catchments on the map will bring up the name of the river or stream assigned by the Geographic Names Information System ("GNIS_Name") and a ranking (e.g., "tax_rank" for taxonomic conservation priority).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516743
title: Appendix A. Equations describing the susceptible, exposed (latent), and infectious (SEI) model for mosquitoes and the susceptible, acutely infected, and recovered (SIR) model for each bird species.

description: Equations describing the susceptible, exposed (latent), and infectious (SEI) model for mosquitoes and the susceptible, acutely infected, and recovered (SIR) model for each bird species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516743.v1
title: Appendix A. Equations describing the susceptible, exposed (latent), and infectious (SEI) model for mosquitoes and the susceptible, acutely infected, and recovered (SIR) model for each bird species.

description: Equations describing the susceptible, exposed (latent), and infectious (SEI) model for mosquitoes and the susceptible, acutely infected, and recovered (SIR) model for each bird species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516740
title: Appendix B. Data for study sites, description of model parameters, and model sensitivity results.

description: Data for study sites, description of model parameters, and model sensitivity results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516740.v1
title: Appendix B. Data for study sites, description of model parameters, and model sensitivity results.

description: Data for study sites, description of model parameters, and model sensitivity results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516737
title: Appendix C. Figures describing bird breeding cycles, study site map, predicted mosquito population dynamics, and comparison of predicted vs. observed mosquito abundance and prevalence.

description: Figures describing bird breeding cycles, study site map, predicted mosquito population dynamics, and comparison of predicted vs. observed mosquito abundance and prevalence.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516734
title: Appendix A. Model structure and parameters.

description: Model structure and parameters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516734.v1
title: Appendix A. Model structure and parameters.

description: Model structure and parameters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516731
title: Appendix B. Additional model results.

description: Additional model results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516731.v1
title: Appendix B. Additional model results.

description: Additional model results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516728
title: Appendix C. Results of the model sensitivity analysis.

description: Results of the model sensitivity analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516728.v1
title: Appendix C. Results of the model sensitivity analysis.

description: Results of the model sensitivity analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516725
title: Appendix A. Plots of average precipitation and temperature in the spring and summer for the Pawnee National Grassland and Central Plains Experimental Range, Colorado, 1981–2005.

description: Plots of average precipitation and temperature in the spring and summer for the Pawnee National Grassland and Central Plains Experimental Range, Colorado, 1981–2005.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516725.v1
title: Appendix A. Plots of average precipitation and temperature in the spring and summer for the Pawnee National Grassland and Central Plains Experimental Range, Colorado, 1981–2005.

description: Plots of average precipitation and temperature in the spring and summer for the Pawnee National Grassland and Central Plains Experimental Range, Colorado, 1981–2005.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516722
title: Appendix B. Methods and results of tests for spatial and temporal autocorrelation in models that predict extinctions from plague in black-tailed prairie dog towns in northern Colorado, Colorado, 1981–2005.

description: Methods and results of tests for spatial and temporal autocorrelation in models that predict extinctions from plague in black-tailed prairie dog towns in northern Colorado, Colorado, 1981–2005.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516722.v1
title: Appendix B. Methods and results of tests for spatial and temporal autocorrelation in models that predict extinctions from plague in black-tailed prairie dog towns in northern Colorado, Colorado, 1981–2005.

description: Methods and results of tests for spatial and temporal autocorrelation in models that predict extinctions from plague in black-tailed prairie dog towns in northern Colorado, Colorado, 1981–2005.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516719
title: Appendix A. Form of the transition matrix model and modifier functions used to model source and sink population demographic rates, along with baseline survival and fecundity rates and final “best model” parameter estimates.

description: Form of the transition matrix model and modifier functions used to model source and sink population demographic rates, along with baseline survival and fecundity rates and final “best model” parameter estimates.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516719.v1
title: Appendix A. Form of the transition matrix model and modifier functions used to model source and sink population demographic rates, along with baseline survival and fecundity rates and final “best model” parameter estimates.

description: Form of the transition matrix model and modifier functions used to model source and sink population demographic rates, along with baseline survival and fecundity rates and final “best model” parameter estimates.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516713
title: Appendix A. Population growth rate bias and mean-square error in the heterogeneous model and the homogeneous model fitted to simulated data.

description: Population growth rate bias and mean-square error in the heterogeneous model and the homogeneous model fitted to simulated data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516713.v1
title: Appendix A. Population growth rate bias and mean-square error in the heterogeneous model and the homogeneous model fitted to simulated data.

description: Population growth rate bias and mean-square error in the heterogeneous model and the homogeneous model fitted to simulated data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516710
title: Appendix B. Survival and seniority bias and mean-square error in the model with heterogeneity vs. a model with homogeneity.

description: Survival and seniority bias and mean-square error in the model with heterogeneity vs. a model with homogeneity.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516701
title: Appendix A. Data sources for elk pregnancy rates.

description: Data sources for elk pregnancy rates.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516701.v1
title: Appendix A. Data sources for elk pregnancy rates.

description: Data sources for elk pregnancy rates.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516698
title: Appendix A. Invertebrate responses to urbanization in the nine metropolitan areas based on EPT richness (EPT), ordination scores (NMDS), and organism tolerances (RICHTOL) summarized as linear and loess regressions and compared with change points defined by TITAN analysis.

description: Invertebrate responses to urbanization in the nine metropolitan areas based on EPT richness (EPT), ordination scores (NMDS), and organism tolerances (RICHTOL) summarized as linear and loess regressions and compared with change points defined by TITAN analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516695
title: Supplement 1. Data used to simulate dose-response, broken-stick, step-function, and linear response models in the evaluation of TITAN-derived change points.

description: File List Model_Sim_data.txt Description The file Model_Sim_data.txt is a tab-delimited text file containing the data used to simulate dose-response, broken-stick, step-function, and linear response models in the evaluation of TITAN-derived change points Column definitions: STAID: station identifier Urb: urban intensity BS: broken stick model with threshold at 0.5 Lin: linear model with no threshold STP: step-function model with threshold at 0.5 DR: does-response model with thresholds at 0.35 and 0.65 Checksums: -- TABLE: Please see in attached file. --
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516698.v1
title: Appendix A. Invertebrate responses to urbanization in the nine metropolitan areas based on EPT richness (EPT), ordination scores (NMDS), and organism tolerances (RICHTOL) summarized as linear and loess regressions and compared with change points defined by TITAN analysis.

description: Invertebrate responses to urbanization in the nine metropolitan areas based on EPT richness (EPT), ordination scores (NMDS), and organism tolerances (RICHTOL) summarized as linear and loess regressions and compared with change points defined by TITAN analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516695.v1
title: Supplement 1. Data used to simulate dose-response, broken-stick, step-function, and linear response models in the evaluation of TITAN-derived change points.

description: File List Model_Sim_data.txt Description The file Model_Sim_data.txt is a tab-delimited text file containing the data used to simulate dose-response, broken-stick, step-function, and linear response models in the evaluation of TITAN-derived change points Column definitions: STAID: station identifier Urb: urban intensity BS: broken stick model with threshold at 0.5 Lin: linear model with no threshold STP: step-function model with threshold at 0.5 DR: does-response model with thresholds at 0.35 and 0.65 Checksums: -- TABLE: Please see in attached file. --
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516692
title: Appendix A. Scatterplots of community metrics in response to low levels of urban intensity (MA-NUII) among six U.S. metropolitan areas studied by Cuffney et al. (2010).

description: Scatterplots of community metrics in response to low levels of urban intensity (MA-NUII) among six U.S. metropolitan areas studied by Cuffney et al. (2010).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516692.v1
title: Appendix A. Scatterplots of community metrics in response to low levels of urban intensity (MA-NUII) among six U.S. metropolitan areas studied by Cuffney et al. (2010).

description: Scatterplots of community metrics in response to low levels of urban intensity (MA-NUII) among six U.S. metropolitan areas studied by Cuffney et al. (2010).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516689
title: Appendix A. The relevant parameters of phosphorus-flow equations.

description: The relevant parameters of phosphorus-flow equations.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516689.v1
title: Appendix A. The relevant parameters of phosphorus-flow equations.

description: The relevant parameters of phosphorus-flow equations.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516686
title: Appendix B. The corresponding model equations for all defined activities with respect to the P metabolism model for the case study area of Shucheng County, China.

description: The corresponding model equations for all defined activities with respect to the P metabolism model for the case study area of Shucheng County, China.