cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.25494/p61p49
title: North Central Coast: Coastal environmental conditions (1990-2010)

description: Evaluation of management actions requires baseline information on environmental variability that may also affect biological populations and confound interpretations. Here, we develop and explore ocean-climate indicators (“OCI”) of temporal environmental variability known to affect fish and wildlife of the north-central California Current over 21 years, 1990-2010. This analysis supports ongoing efforts to evaluate responses in local coastal ecosystems to recent changes in fishing effort practices within the State’s newly established network of marine protected areas (MPA). To develop multivariate OCI, we selected, compiled and analyzed 16 well-known atmospheric and oceanographic indicators that represent key basin-scale drivers and regional attributes of the coastal environment. These include drivers of ocean-climate variability from the tropics (e.g., SOI/ENSO) and extra-tropics (e.g., PNA/PDO/NPGO), and regional-local driver/response variables such as wind stress, sea surface temperature and salinity, and a novel time series of surface flow from the State of California’s HF radar array. We implemented seasonally-based multivariate OCI using principal component analysis. Over the study period, the ENSO cycle apparently weakened resulting in fewer and less intense El Niño events. Sub-arctic influences increased with a strengthening of the North Pacific Gyre Oscillation (NPGO) and cooling of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). Corresponding to these changes, the Northern Oscillation Index (NOI) strengthened leading to enhanced upwelling-favorable wind stress as well as air and ocean surface temperature cooling. Phytoplankton biomass, proxied by satellite remote-sensing of chl-a, increased from 1995-2010. However, this positive trend in lower trophic level productivity was not observed in mid (juvenile Sebastes) or upper trophic level (salmon) biological indicators. Our results support a hypothesis of enhanced sub-arctic influences and upwelling intensification in north-central California over the past two decades that is contributing to greater lower, but not upper, trophic level productivity. Linking these changes to newly obtained biological records within and outside newly established MPA is warranted to separate the effects of climate variability from changes in fishing pressure on coastal ecosystems.This dataset was originally uploaded to Oceanspaces (http://oceanspaces.org/) in 2013 as part of the North Central Coast baseline monitoring program. In 2020 the baseline data and reports were uploaded to the California Ocean Protection Council Data Repository by Mike Esgro (Michael.Esgro@resources.ca.gov) and Rani Gaddam (gaddam@ucsc.edu). Every attempt has been made to include all of the original data, metadata, and reports submitted in 2013, but please contact the Data Set Contacts with any questions. The long-term California MPA boundary and project info tables referenced in this dataset can be found as a separate dataset here: https://opc.dataone.org/view/doi:10.25494/P64S3W
DOI: 10.25494/p65c7k
title: North Central Coast: coastal recreation sector: survey and spatial data

description: The coastal recreation study is designed to establish a baseline characterization of participation rates and the economic value of coastal recreation and provide a spatial baseline of coastal recreation use patterns in the North Central Coast region. Please see the project report for full details on the data collection and analysis methods as well as a listing of survey questions. Included in this data package is a summary of all survey data as well as a PDF map depicting intensity of use across all coastal recreation activities data collected in the region. We also have spatial data for individual activities, including: Scenic enjoyment; Beach going (dog-walking, kite-flying, jogging, etc.); Photography; Watching birds and/or other marine life from shore; Sitting in your car watching the scene; Biking or hiking; Collection of non-living resources/beachcombing (agates, fossils, driftwood); and Swimming or body surfing in the ocean. If you would like to access the GIS data from this project please contact us.This dataset was originally uploaded to Oceanspaces (http://oceanspaces.org/) in 2013 as part of the North Central Coast baseline monitoring program. In 2020 the baseline data and reports were uploaded to the California Ocean Protection Council Data Repository by Mike Esgro (Michael.Esgro@resources.ca.gov) and Rani Gaddam (gaddam@ucsc.edu). Every attempt has been made to include all of the original data, metadata, and reports submitted in 2013, but please contact the Data Set Contacts with any questions. The long-term California MPA boundary and project info tables referenced in this dataset can be found as a separate dataset here: https://opc.dataone.org/view/doi:10.25494/P64S3W
DOI: 10.25494/p6ww2c
title: North Central Coast: citizen-science surveys of birds, mammals, and human uses

description: This metadata record documents the Beach Watch project citizen science monitoring for birds, mammals, and human use baseline in the North Central Coast from 1994-2012. Citizen Scientists conduct bi-monthly surveys for over 300 species of birds and mammals and 25 types of human use types at 42 sites. Monthly rates of observation are provided for live wildlife, dead wildlife, and human uses from 1994-2012. Each site is fixed, general characteristics and location are provided. Complete description of survey protocols is provided here and at https://farallones.noaa.gov/science/beachwatch.html (link is external).This dataset was originally uploaded to Oceanspaces (http://oceanspaces.org/) in 2013 as part of the North Central Coast baseline monitoring program. In 2020 the baseline data and reports were uploaded to the California Ocean Protection Council Data Repository by Mike Esgro (Michael.Esgro@resources.ca.gov) and Rani Gaddam (gaddam@ucsc.edu). Every attempt has been made to include all of the original data, metadata, and reports submitted in 2013, but please contact the Data Set Contacts with any questions. The long-term California MPA boundary and project info tables referenced in this dataset can be found as a separate dataset here: https://opc.dataone.org/view/doi:10.25494/P64S3W
DOI: 10.25494/p6hp4n
title: North Central Coast: commercial fishing sector: survey and spatial data

description: This data package includes: 1) Survey data - collected through fisherman interviews for the fishing years 2010 and 2011 and 2) Fishing maps - spatial fishing data for the 2010 fishing year at the region level. Our research team conducted in-person interviews with commercial fishermen who made landings in 2010 and/or 2011 in the study region for the following state water fisheries: California halibut (hook & line); Dungeness crab (trap); Nearshore finfish (live—fixed gear); salmon (troll); and urchin (dive). Please see the final project technical report and appendix for project methods and a full summary of results. As part of the baseline monitoring project we collected extensive spatial fishing data. Included here are PDFs of the data collected aggregated to the region level for each fishery. We also have data which is aggregated to the port level and fishing data for the 2011 fishing year. If you would like to access port level data, 2011 spatial fishing data, or GIS files of spatial fishing data please contact us.This dataset was originally uploaded to Oceanspaces (http://oceanspaces.org/) in 2013 as part of the North Central Coast baseline monitoring program. In 2020 the baseline data and reports were uploaded to the California Ocean Protection Council Data Repository by Mike Esgro (Michael.Esgro@resources.ca.gov) and Rani Gaddam (gaddam@ucsc.edu). Every attempt has been made to include all of the original data, metadata, and reports submitted in 2013, but please contact the Data Set Contacts with any questions. The long-term California MPA boundary and project info tables referenced in this dataset can be found as a separate dataset here: https://opc.dataone.org/view/doi:10.25494/P64S3W
DOI: 10.25494/p6s59v
title: North Central Coast: ROV surveys of soft and rocky deep-water ecosystems

description: This package includes data collected during ROV transects conducted within and adjacent to California's North Central Coast MPAs which were designated in accordance with the Marine Life Protection Act. The transects were conducted by the Institute of Applied Marine Ecology (IfAME) and Marine Applied Research and Exploration (MARE) aboard F/V Donna Kathleen during the summers of 2010 and 2011. These surveys were designed to collect baseline data, capturing the state of the NCC MPAs at the time of designation, to be used as a basis for future comparisons. The areas surveyed comprise deep benthic soft-bottom and rocky-reef ecosystems within a depth range of 20 m to 116 m. The ROV, Beagle, was equipped with forward and down facing video cameras as well as a downward facing still camera. Video and still imagery were collected for post-processing which included the extraction of ecological data including the number and size of fish and invert species along with habitat classification.This dataset was originally uploaded to Oceanspaces (http://oceanspaces.org/) in 2013 as part of the North Central Coast baseline monitoring program. In 2020 the baseline data and reports were uploaded to the California Ocean Protection Council Data Repository by Mike Esgro (Michael.Esgro@resources.ca.gov) and Rani Gaddam (gaddam@ucsc.edu). Every attempt has been made to include all of the original data, metadata, and reports submitted in 2013, but please contact the Data Set Contacts with any questions. The long-term California MPA boundary and project info tables referenced in this dataset can be found as a separate dataset here: https://opc.dataone.org/view/doi:10.25494/P64S3W
DOI: 10.25494/p6d01p
title: MPA Monitoring Action Plan

description: The MPA Monitoring Action Plan informs next steps for long-term MPA monitoring in California by aggregating and synthesizing work to date, as well as by incorporating novel, quantitative, and expert-informed approaches. The Action Plan prioritizes key measures, metrics, habitats, sites, species, human uses, and management questions to target for long-term monitoring to inform the evaluation of California's MPA network.
DOI: 10.25494/p6zp4p
title: Channel Islands marine protected areas: first 5 years of monitoring 2003-2008

description: In 1998, citizens from Santa Barbara and Ventura proposed establishment of no-take marine reserves at the Channel Islands, beginning a 4-year process of public meetings, discussions, and scientific analyses. In 2003, the California Fish and Game Commission designated a network of marine protected areas (MPAs) in state waters around the northern Channel Islands. In 2006 and 2007, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) extended the MPAs into the national marine sanctuary’s deeper, federal waters.To determine if the MPAs are protecting marine species and habitats, scientists are monitoring ecological changes. They are studying changes in habitats; abundance and size of species of interest; the ocean food web and ecosystem; and movement of fish and invertebrates from MPAs to surrounding waters. Additionally, scientists are monitoring human activities such as commercial and recreational fisheries, and compliance with MPA regulations. This booklet describes some results from the first 5 years of monitoring the Channel Islands MPAs.
DOI: 10.25494/p63g6m
title: A decade of protection: 10 years of change at the Channel Islands

description: In 2003, California established thirteen marine protected areas (MPAs) in state waters around the northern Channel Islands, off the coast of Southern California. In 2007, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration extended these MPAs into federal waters of the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary. These areas, most of which are no-take marine reserves, were designed to help restore biodiversity and ecosystem health by protecting local marine life and habitats. To evaluate whether the MPAs are meeting their ecological goals, scientists from the Partnership for Interdisciplinary Studies of Coastal Oceans (PISCO) have been monitoring these rocky reef and kelp forest communities for over a decade.In 2008, PISCO scientists found that after five years of protection, fish species targeted by fishermen had both greater density (numbers of fish per area) and biomass (total weight per area) inside MPAs compared to outside "reference" sites. Though these and other results from the five-year review were promising indicators that MPAs are beneficial to marine life, studies of other long-term protected places suggested the full effects of these protected areas were likely to take decades to develop.2013 marked the ten-year anniversary of the Channel Islands’ MPAs. We now have the opportunity to explore longer-term trends and better understand the effects of these areas on California’s ocean health.This report updates the previous analyses comparing patterns inside and outside of MPAs, and also provides, for the first time, an evaluation of ecological changes detected since the MPAs were established.
DOI: 10.25494/p6q597
title: Monitoring California's rocky marine ecosystems across a network of MPAs: methodological comparison of multiple monitoring techniques

description: California recently completed the implementation of a large network of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) across the state via legislation called the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA). Following implementation of MPAs in each region, the state instigated and funded Phase 1 of a Statewide MPA Monitoring Program which allowed for 2-3 years of baseline ecological monitoring in each region around the time of MPA implementation. Baseline monitoring was intended to provide a benchmark against which future change in MPAs could be evaluated. Importantly, baseline monitoring for many habitats built on existing programs, several of which already had long time-series of monitoring data in and around the MPAs. Building on Phase 1, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and California Ocean Protection Council (OPC) are developing priorities and strategies for Phase 2, statewide long-term monitoring. This study seeks to inform aspects of this long-term monitoring plan by evaluating existing time series and techniques currently being deployed in rocky nearshore ecosystems throughout California. Specifically, we present two studies meant to inform long-term monitoring of MPAs in California: 1) A comparison of two long-term monitoring programs utilizing SCUBA surveys on nearshore rocky reefs and kelp forests, one composed of professional, academic scientists (PISCO - Partnership for Interdisciplinary Studies of Coastal Oceans) and the other a citizen-science program utilizing a combination of paid staff and volunteers (RCCA - ReefCheck California).2) An evaluation of data from multiple monitoring techniques across a large depth gradient to provide information on the latitudinal and depth profile of species likely to be protected by MPAs.
DOI: 10.25494/p6v01q
title: Proceedings of the marine protected area site selection workshop

description: California’s marine protected areas (MPAs) were designed to function as a cohesive and ecologically connected network, pursuant to the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA). The MLPA also requires that the network be monitored to evaluate progress towards meeting the MLPA goals and to inform adaptive management. As a first step, the state implemented Phase 1 of the Statewide MPA Monitoring Program (2007 – 2018) to conduct regional baseline monitoring near the time of MPA implementation. Baseline monitoring established a comprehensive benchmark of ecological and socioeconomic conditions across the state, and provided an important set of data against which future MPA performance can be measured. Building on Phase 1, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and California Ocean Protection Council (OPC) are developing priorities and strategies for Phase 2, statewide long-term monitoring. A Statewide MPA Monitoring Action Plan (Action Plan) is now under development by CDFW and OPC to prioritize MPA index sites, and ecological and socioeconomic indicators for long-term monitoring, and to help guide cost-effective spending and funding for future monitoring projects. The Action Plan will aggregate monitoring recommendations presented in Phase 1 regional MPA monitoring plans and technical reports with novel quantitative and expert informed approaches for long-term monitoring.On January 12, 2018, CDFW and OPC convened a workshop titled “Marine Protected Area Site Selection” with collaborating researchers to discuss and develop recommendations and a shared understanding to inform the development of the Action Plan, including approaches for long-term monitoring design, detecting potential MPA effects, and predicting MPA effectiveness over time. Workshop participants identified core priorities for integrating discussed approaches to inform the Action Plan, and important next steps. Presentations and topics centered around: 1) Incorporating MPA design features and long-term monitoring datasets into site selection criteria2) Monitoring that accounts for fisheries sustainability and ecosystem integrity goals3) Using the state space integration projection model (SSIPM) to estimate fishing mortality rates to set expectations for population responses4) Using spatial point process models for benthic visual survey and sampling design5) Continued facilitation of a Regional Oceanographic Modeling System (ROMS) to estimate network connectivity
DOI: 10.25494/p6kg6z
title: Channel Islands marine protected areas: first 5 years of monitoring 2003-2008

description: In 1998, citizens from Santa Barbara and Ventura proposed establishment of no-take marine reserves at the Channel Islands, beginning a 4-year process of public meetings, discussions, and scientific analyses. In 2003, the California Fish and Game Commission designated a network of marine protected areas (MPAs) in state waters around the northern Channel Islands. In 2006 and 2007, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) extended the MPAs into the national marine sanctuary’s deeper, federal waters.To determine if the MPAs are protecting marine species and habitats, scientists are monitoring ecological changes. They are studying changes in habitats; abundance and size of species of interest; the ocean food web and ecosystem; and movement of fish and invertebrates from MPAs to surrounding waters. Additionally, scientists are monitoring human activities such as commercial and recreational fisheries, and compliance with MPA regulations. This booklet describes some results from the first 5 years of monitoring the Channel Islands MPAs.
DOI: 10.1285/i22402772a8p563
title: International Summer School «Alle radici della cultura giuridica europea. Testi e documenti antichi tra lingua e diritto. The Roots of The European legal culture. Ancient texts and documents between language and law»
DOI: 10.25494/p6fs3p
title: Nearshore Fishes Abundance and Distribution Data, California Collaborative Fisheries Research Program (CCFRP), 2007 - 2019.

description: Data in this collection include the species and quantity of nearshore fishes caught during drifts conducted in and near California Marine Protected Areas between 2007 and 2019. The California Collaborative Fisheries Research Program (CCFRP) initially surveyed four protected areas and four nearby, fished reference areas in central California annually; the program expanded to 15 protected and 16 reference areas statewide in 2017. Data were generated from hook-and-line surveys conducted within 500x500 m grid cells positioned inside protected and reference areas. Each fish caught was identified to the species level whenever possible; otherwise, fish were identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level. The number of hours each angler spent fishing during each survey and the length of each fish caught were also recorded, enabling the calculation of biomass, Catch-Per-Unit-Effort (CPUE), and Biomass-Per-Unit-Effort (BPUE).This submission includes two derived data tables, CCFRP_derived_length_table.csv and CCFRP_derived_effort_table.csv, containing the number of fish of each species caught during each survey, their lengths, the total number of angler hours required to catch them, CPUE and BPUE. The R code used to obtain these tables from the raw data files is also included (CCFRP_derived_data_table_code_R.pdf). Raw data files are stored on the Moss Landing Marine Laboratories Digital Commons (http://islandora.mlml.calstate.edu/islandora/object/islandora%3A10865). The boundaries for the MPAs referenced in this dataset and information on related long-term California MPA monitoring efforts can be found here: https://opc.dataone.org/view/doi:10.25494/P6V884The CCFRP aims to develop rigorous survey methods and collect baseline data on the species, size composition and relative abundance of fishes associated with shallow rocky habitats inside proposed Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and nearby fished reference areas. These data underpin an ongoing monitoring effort that engages the recreational fishing community to help evaluate changes in the species, size composition and relative abundance of fishes in MPA and reference sites after MPA establishment.
DOI: 10.1285/i22402772a8p566
title: Il diritto pubblico romano nelle ricerche di Giorgio Luraschi
DOI: 10.15468/dl.j2kxxb
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 16 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "Geometry POLYGON((-0.0096 40.66737,0.00019 40.66416,0.00706 40.66562,0.0067 40.67194,0.00475 40.67769,-0.00522 40.67893,-0.01252 40.67775,-0.0096 40.66737))",
 "TaxonKey is Fungi"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 16 records from 3 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0027625-241107131044228/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.1285/i22402772a8p570
title: 'I Bonfante. Una storia scientifica italiana'
DOI: 10.1285/i22402772a8p575
title: Presentazione del volume di Luigi Capogrossi Colognesi, Itinera
DOI: 10.1285/i22402772a8p578
title: Ciudades y ciudadanías en Italia e Hispania
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14202351
title: Best practices for medical device cyber security

description: Best practices for medical device cyber security collected by the NEMECYS project
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14202352
title: Best practices for medical device cyber security

description: Best practices for medical device cyber security collected by the NEMECYS project
DOI: 10.1285/i22402772a8p583
title: I generi letterari della storiografia giuridica La produzione didattica negli ultimi due secoli (manuali, trattati, corsi e prolusioni)
DOI: 10.15468/dl.8j6dj9
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 194 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 {
 "not" : {
 "BasisOfRecord" : [
 "is one of (Fossil, Living Specimen)"
 ]
 }
 },
 "TaxonKey is one of (Hololeion krameri (Franch. & Sav.) Kitam.)"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 194 records from 19 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0027626-241107131044228/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.1285/i22402772a8p586
title: Presentazione di Itinera. Pagine scelte di Luigi Capogrossi Colognesi
DOI: 10.1285/i22402772a8p589
title: Ravenna Capitale. Il diritto delle acque nell'Occidente Tardoantico: utilità comune ed interessi privati
DOI: 10.1285/i22402772a8p594
title: Giustiniano. Politica e legislazione nella transizione fra antichità e medioevo