cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxdd
title: Venegas case, 1972 November 23 - 1990 April 18

description: Public session, 1991-05-08: materials from organizations, 2.3, 1972 November 23 - 1990 April 18. PART OF A SERIES: Materials in the series fall into one of several categories related to the Independent Commission's work product: (1) Commission meeting materials, which include meeting agendas, work plans, memoranda, and articles about police misconduct that were circulated and reviewed during the Commission's internal meetings; (2) public correspondence, which includes citizen complaints against the LAPD in the form of written testimony, articles, and an audio cassette tape, as well as letters drafted by citizens in support of the LAPD; (3) summaries of interviews held with LAPD officers regarding Departmental procedures and relations; (4) public meeting materials, which include transcripts, supplementary documents, and witness statements that were reviewed at the Commission's public meetings; (5) press releases related to the formation and work product of the Commission; and (6) miscellaneous materials reviewed by the Commission during its study, including LAPD personnel and training manuals, a memorandum of understanding, and messages from the LAPD's Mobile Digital Terminal (MDT) system. Compilation of documents:cover picture (p. 1) along with letter from Juan Francisco Venegas (p. 2-6) and various attachments "pertaining to the case and the briefs filed in the U.S. Supreme Court" (p. 7-67), 1982 - 1990 April.Index -- list of briefs and opinions (p. 68)Section 1: Juan Francisco Venegas v. Ronnie J. Skaggs, Carthel S. Roberson -- Memorandum of decision and order (p. 69-85), 1986 February 28 - 1987 February 9.Section 2: For publication -- appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California (p. 86-102), 1989 January 31.Section 3: Juan Francisco Venegas v. Michael R. Mitchell -- Brief for the petitioner (p. 103-153), 1989 October.Section 4: Juan Francisco Venegas v. Michael R. Mitchell -- Brief for the respondent (p. 154-201), 1989 October - December 15.Section 5: Juan Francisco Venegas v. Michael R. Mitchel -- Reply brief for the petitioner (p. 202-228), 1989 October.Section 6: Syllabus of Vengas v. Mitchell -- certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (p. 229-239), 1990 February 21 - April 18.Section 7: "Official transcript proceedings before the Supreme Court of the United States" -- Juan Francisco Venegas v. Michael R. Mitchell (p. 240-296), 1990 February 21; Newsclippings regarding Juan Francisco Venegas' case (p. 297-309), 1972 November 23 - 1988 January 6
DOI: 10.25549/gar-c81-1012
title: St. John Adcock, letter, 1924-08-09, to Hamlin Garland

description: St. John Adcock, 6 Queens Gardens, Richmond Hill, England; United Kingdom, letter, 1924 August 9, to Hamlin Garland. "I am so sorry I am no good for to-morrow (I called through to the Author's Club and left a message)…" -- first line.
DOI: 10.25549/gar-c81-33491
title: Willard Wattles, letter, 1918-06-14, to Hamlin Garland

description: Willard Wattles (Army and Navy Young Men's Christian Association), Camp Funston, Fort Riley, Kansas, USA, letter, 1918 June 14, to Hamlin Garland. "In one of the Y.M.C.A. libraries of Camp Funston I found a book I have been wanting to read ever since it was published about a year ago." -- first line.
DOI: 10.25549/gar-c81-923
title: C.E. Adams, letter, 1923-05-24, to Hamlin Garland

description: C.E. Adams, Los Angeles, California, USA, letter, 1923 May 24, to Hamlin Garland, New York, New York, USA. "We were greatly blessed to hear from you…" -- first line.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxm7
title: Witness files - Fabricatore, Joseph M., 1991-04-08

description: JosephM. Fabricatore, letter (sent by telefacsimile), 1991 April 8, to Warren Christopher (O'Melveny & Myers), 400 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, California, USA. With résumé. Witness files - Fabricatore, Joseph M., 1991 April 8. PART OF A SERIES: The circumstances surrounding the beating of Rodney King led many to believe that the incident was racially motivated and reflected a spirit of bias and discrimination within the LAPD. Irell & Manella analyzed in depth the LAPD's recruitment, hiring, training, and promotion practices to determine if bias and intolerance were in fact pervasive issues within the Department. The series includes materials related to Irell and Manella's work product, including the firm’s correspondence; summaries of personnel files for potential recruits; records of the Leon Panduro case, in which a citizen was shot by a probationary officer; minutes from the LAPD Professional Advisory Committee maintained between 1983 and 1991; witness files, which consist of written testimony and supplemental materials; and notes, outlines, and drafts maintained over the course of Irell and Manella’s investigation.
DOI: 10.25549/gar-c81-946
title: H.S. Adams, letter, 1931-07-31, to Hamlin Garland

description: H.S. Adams (The Spur), 425 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York, USA, letter, 1931 July 31, to Hamlin Garland, 507 Cathedral Parkway, New York, New York, USA. "If you have not seen it already you will be interested…" -- first line.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxxh
title: Gale, memo, 1991-06-25, re Linfield interview

description: Todd Gale (Kirkland & Ellis), memorandum, 1991 June 25, to File - Christopher Commission, re Summary of interview with Senior Lead Officer Donald Linfield. Memoranda Interviews - Linfield, Donald. PART OF A SERIES: Kirkland & Ellis provided general assistance to the Independent Commission over the course of its investigation, and also researched the merits and drawbacks associated with a community-oriented policing model. Included in the series are article clippings, reports, and other source materials related to community-oriented policing; interviews with personnel from the LAPD’s Harbor Division, where a community-oriented model was tested; and interviews with personnel from other LAPD divisions about their perceptions of departmental operations.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxvx
title: Documents: LA DA's Office materials, 1987 Dec. - 1990

description: Documents: LA DA's Office materials, 1987 December - 1990. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.1. Election violations official misconduct pamphlet, 1987-122. Special Investigations Division pamphlet, 1987-123. Felony / misdemeanor complaints (1989-1990), [1991?]4. Criminal justice II work flow, [s.d.]5. Livesay, résumé, [after 1979]6. District Attorney organizational chart, 1990-087. Bureau of Branch & Area Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]8. Bureau of Central Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]9. Bureau of Family Support Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]10. Bureau of Investigation organizational chart, [s.d.]11. Bureau of Management & Budget organizational chart, [s.d.]12. Bureau of Special Operations organizational chart, [s.d.]13. Media Relations Division organizational chart, [s.d.]14. Public Affairs Division organizational chart, [s.d.]
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxws
title: Category 2, 1975 Sept. 16 - 1991 May 24

description: Category 2, 1975 September 16 - 1991 May 24. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.1. Wayne, fax, 1991-04-25, to Marcus2. Marcus, fax, 1991-04-25, to Wayne3. Wayne, memo, 1991-04-19, to Feess4. Hevener, memo, 1991-04-16, to Feess5. Deputy D.A. interview outline, 1991-04-196. Livesay interview outline, 1991-04-047. Feess, fax, 1991-05-15, to Holliday8. Independent Commission, notes, [1991]9. Ray, memo, 1991-05-0310. Knecht interview summary, 1991-05-2411. LAPD board of rights manual, 1987-0812. Public safety officers procedural bill of rights act, chapter 9.7, 1977-01-0113. Board of Police Commissioners & City Administrative Officer, memo of understanding no. 24, 1989-03-01, to City Council14. History of the disciplinary system in the LAPD, [1991]15. Excerpt from a book on the history of the LAPD, [after 1982]16. Holcomb v. City of LA, 1989-05-0817. Skelly v. State Personnel Board, 1975-09-16
DOI: 10.15468/dl.cxe5d3
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 100 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "Country is Argentina",
 "TaxonKey is Gymnocalycium gibbosum"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 100 records from 12 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0024020-251025141854904/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxwk
title: Interviews: notes - Livesay, Curtis, interview, 1991 April 4-8

description: Interviews: notes - Livesay, Curtis, interview, 1991 April 4-8. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.1. Hevener, letter, 1991-04-08, to Gunson2. Livesay interview outline, 1991-04-043. Memo, 1991-04-05, to Feess4. Livesay interview notes, [1991]5. Livesay interview notes, [1991]6. Livesay interview outline, 1991-04-047. Livesay interview notes, [1991]8. Livesay interview notes, [1991]9. Livesay presentation summary, [1991]
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxwi
title: Witness file - Zinzun, Michael, 1980 June 24 - 1991 May 3

description: Witness file - Zinzun, Michael, 1980 June 24 - 1991 May 3. PART OF A SERIES: Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue investigated how LAPD administrators respond to personnel complaints and allegations of misconduct. Materials in the series were collected and analyzed by the firm for this purpose, and include summaries of witness interviews; article clippings discussing instances of alleged police misconduct; source materials related to the LAPD’s use-of-force policies; a transcript of a court case involving officer misconduct; summaries of personnel complaint statistics; and excerpts taken from the personnel files of officers with multiple complaints and misconduct charges. Also included is correspondence sent and received by the firm over the course of its investigation.1. Friedel, memo, 1991-05-02, to Spiegel2. LAPD officer involved shooting & in custody police related deaths (1989-1990), 1991-05-033. LAPD forced to use business card, 1980-06-244. Friedel, memo, 1991-05-02, to Spiegel
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxlm
title: LaMothe, memo, 1991-07-08, to Spiegel

description: Louise A. LaMothe (Irell & Manella), 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Los Angeles, California, USA, memorandum (sent by telefacsimile), 1991 July 8, to Joihn W. Spiegel, re Use of dogs. PART OF A SERIES: The circumstances surrounding the beating of Rodney King led many to believe that the incident was racially motivated and reflected a spirit of bias and discrimination within the LAPD. Irell & Manella analyzed in depth the LAPD's recruitment, hiring, training, and promotion practices to determine if bias and intolerance were in fact pervasive issues within the Department. The series includes materials related to Irell and Manella's work product, including the firm’s correspondence; summaries of personnel files for potential recruits; records of the Leon Panduro case, in which a citizen was shot by a probationary officer; minutes from the LAPD Professional Advisory Committee maintained between 1983 and 1991; witness files, which consist of written testimony and supplemental materials; and notes, outlines, and drafts maintained over the course of Irell and Manella’s investigation.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399l0wa
title: Case & officer summary analysis 10, 1991 (3 of 3)

description: Case and officer summary analysis (83 cases sampled). Section 10) Race distribution of out of patrol promotees; Race distribution of promotees; Analysis of time between incidents and promotion; Summary by classification of nature of incident; etc. (1976-1991), 1991 June 7-18. Collection of reports and summary analysis of the LAPD re the 83 cases previously reviewed - includes data on disciplinary actions taken by LAPD, history of officer's excessive force, promotions, and awards, etc. (1976-1991) (3 of 3). PART OF A SERIES: The series includes materials related to the work product of Price Waterhouse, whose staff investigated citizen complaints and civil litigation claims involving the LAPD. Included are claims reports, claims analyses, card files, and arbitration reports; summaries of 83 selected civil litigation cases; materials from the personnel files of LAPD officers named in these cases, as well as documents listing their subsequent penalties; and statistics that break complaints down according to a variety of criteria, including race, gender, and police division.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxld
title: Leon Panduro case file (1 of 2), 1990 Jan. 28 - 1991 May 13

description: Leon Panduro case file (1 of 2), 1990 January 28 - 1991 May 13. PART OF A SERIES: The circumstances surrounding the beating of Rodney King led many to believe that the incident was racially motivated and reflected a spirit of bias and discrimination within the LAPD. Irell & Manella analyzed in depth the LAPD's recruitment, hiring, training, and promotion practices to determine if bias and intolerance were in fact pervasive issues within the Department. The series includes materials related to Irell and Manella's work product, including the firm’s correspondence; summaries of personnel files for potential recruits; records of the Leon Panduro case, in which a citizen was shot by a probationary officer; minutes from the LAPD Professional Advisory Committee maintained between 1983 and 1991; witness files, which consist of written testimony and supplemental materials; and notes, outlines, and drafts maintained over the course of Irell and Manella’s investigation.1. Panduro vs. LAPD, 1991-05-132. Panduro vs. LAPD, 1990-09-043. Panduro vs. LAPD, 1990-12-034. LAPD preliminary investigation of Battery on Browne, 1990-03-055. LAPD follow-up investigation of Brown, 1990-03-066. LAPD property report of Brown, 1990-03-067. [Gates], memo, 1991-01-318. Hall, report, 1990-12-05, to Gates9. Report, 1990 Jan. 28 - Mar. 2, re Eddie Viera10. Panduro vs. LAPD, 1990-09-0411. Panduro vs. LAPD, 1990-11-0112. Coroner's photographs, 1990-03-0613. Panduro vs. LAPD, 1990-09-0414. Panduro vs. LAPD, 1990-09-0415. Panduro vs. LAPD, 1990-03-2616. Autopsy report, 1990-03-06, of Panduro17. Call for service at Rosanna St., 1991-03-1218. LAPD preliminary investigation of Battery on Browne, 1990-03-0519. LAPD follow-up investigation of Brown, 1990-03-0620. LAPD property report of Brown, 1990-03-0621. LAFD emergency medical service report, 1990-03-0222. LAPD firearms analyzed evidence report, 1990-11-0323. LAPD death investigation, 1990-03-02, of Panduro24. [Gates], memo, 1991-01-31
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399l0vx
title: Police officer summary info for 83 cases M, 1991

description: Collection of material re case summaries of the 83 selected cases by the Independent Commission - cases against LAPD - Alphabetized by last name - Section "M" (1948-1991), 1991 May 30 - June 19. Folder / binder 5. Police officer summary info for "83 Cases" I-Q (2 of 3). PART OF A SERIES: The series includes materials related to the work product of Price Waterhouse, whose staff investigated citizen complaints and civil litigation claims involving the LAPD. Included are claims reports, claims analyses, card files, and arbitration reports; summaries of 83 selected civil litigation cases; materials from the personnel files of LAPD officers named in these cases, as well as documents listing their subsequent penalties; and statistics that break complaints down according to a variety of criteria, including race, gender, and police division.
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxlf
title: Leon Panduro case file (1 of 2), 1990 Jan. 28 - 1991 May 13

description: Leon Panduro case file (1 of 2), 1990 January 28 - 1991 May 13. PART OF A SERIES: The circumstances surrounding the beating of Rodney King led many to believe that the incident was racially motivated and reflected a spirit of bias and discrimination within the LAPD. Irell & Manella analyzed in depth the LAPD's recruitment, hiring, training, and promotion practices to determine if bias and intolerance were in fact pervasive issues within the Department. The series includes materials related to Irell and Manella's work product, including the firm’s correspondence; summaries of personnel files for potential recruits; records of the Leon Panduro case, in which a citizen was shot by a probationary officer; minutes from the LAPD Professional Advisory Committee maintained between 1983 and 1991; witness files, which consist of written testimony and supplemental materials; and notes, outlines, and drafts maintained over the course of Irell and Manella’s investigation.1. Panduro vs. LAPD, 1991-05-132. Panduro vs. LAPD, 1990-09-043. Panduro vs. LAPD, 1990-12-034. LAPD preliminary investigation of Battery on Browne, 1990-03-055. LAPD follow-up investigation of Brown, 1990-03-066. LAPD property report of Brown, 1990-03-067. [Gates], memo, 1991-01-318. Hall, report, 1990-12-05, to Gates9. Report, 1990 Jan. 28 - Mar. 2, re Eddie Viera10. Panduro vs. LAPD, 1990-09-0411. Panduro vs. LAPD, 1990-11-0112. Coroner's photographs, 1990-03-0613. Panduro vs. LAPD, 1990-09-0414. Panduro vs. LAPD, 1990-09-0415. Panduro vs. LAPD, 1990-03-2616. Autopsy report, 1990-03-06, of Panduro17. Call for service at Rosanna St., 1991-03-1218. LAPD preliminary investigation of Battery on Browne, 1990-03-0519. LAPD follow-up investigation of Brown, 1990-03-0620. LAPD property report of Brown, 1990-03-0621. LAFD emergency medical service report, 1990-03-0222. LAPD firearms analyzed evidence report, 1990-11-0323. LAPD death investigation, 1990-03-02, of Panduro24. [Gates], memo, 1991-01-31
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399l0vw
title: Police officer summary info for 83 cases I-Q (1 of 3), [1991]

description: Folder / binder 5. Police officer summary info for "83 Cases" I-Q (1 of 3) (1954-1991), 1991. PART OF A SERIES: The series includes materials related to the work product of Price Waterhouse, whose staff investigated citizen complaints and civil litigation claims involving the LAPD. Included are claims reports, claims analyses, card files, and arbitration reports; summaries of 83 selected civil litigation cases; materials from the personnel files of LAPD officers named in these cases, as well as documents listing their subsequent penalties; and statistics that break complaints down according to a variety of criteria, including race, gender, and police division.1. Police officer summary info for 83 cases I-Q binder, [1991]2. Police officer summary info for 83 cases I, [1991]3. Police officer summary info for 83 cases J, [1991]4. Police officer summary info for 83 cases K, 19915. Police officer summary info for 83 cases L, 1991
DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kxkb
title: Correspondence (1 of 3), 1991 May 8 - July 10

description: Correspondence (1 of 3), 1991 May 8 - July 10. PART OF A SERIES: The circumstances surrounding the beating of Rodney King led many to believe that the incident was racially motivated and reflected a spirit of bias and discrimination within the LAPD. Irell & Manella analyzed in depth the LAPD's recruitment, hiring, training, and promotion practices to determine if bias and intolerance were in fact pervasive issues within the Department. The series includes materials related to Irell and Manella's work product, including the firm’s correspondence; summaries of personnel files for potential recruits; records of the Leon Panduro case, in which a citizen was shot by a probationary officer; minutes from the LAPD Professional Advisory Committee maintained between 1983 and 1991; witness files, which consist of written testimony and supplemental materials; and notes, outlines, and drafts maintained over the course of Irell and Manella’s investigation.1. Holcomb, memo, 1991-07-10, to Ullman2. Silverman, letter, 1991-07-10, to Clayton3. LaMothe, letter, 1991-07-09, to Kennedy4. Lamothe, letter, 1991-07-09, to Murphy5. Graysen, letter, 1991-07-08, to Silverman6. Maghan, letter, 1991-06-26, to Spiegel7. Fax, 1991-06-24, to LaMothe8. Lee, fax, 1991-06-21, to Silverman9. Holcomb, memo, 1991-06-21, to Ullman10. Fax, 1991-06-18, to Silverman11. Holliday, memo, 1991-06-1812. Boston, memo, 1991-06-1713. Ray, fax, 1991-06-1314. Currey, fax, [1991]-06-1215. Fleming, fax, 1991-06-12, to LaMothe16. Holcomb, memo, 1991-06-12, to Ullman17. LaMothe, memo, 1991-06-11, to Ullman18. LaMothe, letter, 1991-06-11, to Ray19. Holcomb, fax, 1991-06-06, to Sherrell20. Silverman, memo, 1991-06-05, to Spiegel21. Spiegel, fax, 1991-06-04, to LaMothe22. Berkowitz, letter, 1991-06-03, to West23. Ray, fax, 1991-06-0324. Silverman, letter, 1991-06-03, to Riley25. Huebner, memo, 1991-06-03, to Spiegel26. Holliday, fax, 1991-06-03, to laMothe27. Ray, fax, 1991-06-0328. Boston, memo, 1991-06-0329. Holliday, letter, 1991-05-31, to LaMothe30. Fleming, fax, 1991-05-31, to LaMothe31. LaMothe, memo, 1991-05-3032. Holliday, memo, 1991-06-18, to Anderson33. Eitner, fax, 1991-05-29, to Christopher34. LaMothe, memo, 1991-05-2735. Bonner, memo, 1991-05-2836. Sherrell, memo, 1991-05-28, to Spiegel37. LaMothe, letter, 1991-05-23, to Spiegel38. LaMothe, fax, 1991-05-23, to Orozco39. LaMothe, memo, 1991-05-20, to Spiegel40. Spiegel, fax, 1991-05-20, to LaMothe41. Gates, memo, 1991-05-17, department policy on nondiscrimination42. Murphy, letter, 1991-05-14, to Christopher43. LAPD complaint procedures, [s.d.]