cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560877.v1
title: Appendix C. Supplementary information on the data set and statistical approaches.

description: Supplementary information on the data set and statistical approaches.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560874
title: Appendix D. Comparison among phylogenetic trees (topology and branch lengths).

description: Comparison among phylogenetic trees (topology and branch lengths).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560874.v1
title: Appendix D. Comparison among phylogenetic trees (topology and branch lengths).

description: Comparison among phylogenetic trees (topology and branch lengths).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560871
title: Appendix E. Supplementary results on phylogenetic signal in traits.

description: Supplementary results on phylogenetic signal in traits.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560871.v1
title: Appendix E. Supplementary results on phylogenetic signal in traits.

description: Supplementary results on phylogenetic signal in traits.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560868
title: Appendix F. Detailed descriptions of the associations between species’ life history traits and environmental variables.

description: Detailed descriptions of the associations between species’ life history traits and environmental variables.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560868.v1
title: Appendix F. Detailed descriptions of the associations between species’ life history traits and environmental variables.

description: Detailed descriptions of the associations between species’ life history traits and environmental variables.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560865
title: Appendix A. Environmental characteristics and location of each study site along the latitudinal gradient.

description: Environmental characteristics and location of each study site along the latitudinal gradient.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560865.v1
title: Appendix A. Environmental characteristics and location of each study site along the latitudinal gradient.

description: Environmental characteristics and location of each study site along the latitudinal gradient.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560862
title: Appendix B. Plant biomass, tissue allocation, and N content of Spartina alterniflora plants from the mesocosm experiment.

description: Plant biomass, tissue allocation, and N content of Spartina alterniflora plants from the mesocosm experiment.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560862.v1
title: Appendix B. Plant biomass, tissue allocation, and N content of Spartina alterniflora plants from the mesocosm experiment.

description: Plant biomass, tissue allocation, and N content of Spartina alterniflora plants from the mesocosm experiment.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560859
title: Appendix A. A list of the studies included in the analysis.

description: A list of the studies included in the analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560856
title: Appendix B. The analyses conducted with pure environmental fraction (E/S).

description: The analyses conducted with pure environmental fraction (E/S).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560853
title: Appendix A. A figure illustrating the correlative relationship between soil shear strength and rooting depth.

description: A figure illustrating the correlative relationship between soil shear strength and rooting depth.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560853.v1
title: Appendix A. A figure illustrating the correlative relationship between soil shear strength and rooting depth.

description: A figure illustrating the correlative relationship between soil shear strength and rooting depth.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560850
title: Appendix A. Publications included meta-analysis of biotic resistance to freshwater invasions.

description: Publications included meta-analysis of biotic resistance to freshwater invasions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560847
title: Appendix B. Model selection and model averaging used for examining the factors determining biotic resistance in freshwater studies.

description: Model selection and model averaging used for examining the factors determining biotic resistance in freshwater studies.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560844
title: Appendix A. Description of the site-structured demographic model.

description: Description of the site-structured demographic model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560841
title: Appendix B. Description of the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) presented for comparison with the demographic model.

description: Description of the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) presented for comparison with the demographic model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560838
title: Appendix C. Detailed description of habitat classifications listed in Fig. 1 caption.

description: Detailed description of habitat classifications listed in Fig. 1 caption.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560838.v1
title: Appendix C. Detailed description of habitat classifications listed in Fig. 1 caption.

description: Detailed description of habitat classifications listed in Fig. 1 caption.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560835
title: Appendix D. Plot of data and fitted estimates of site-specific abundance for goliath grouper and mutton snapper.

description: Plot of data and fitted estimates of site-specific abundance for goliath grouper and mutton snapper.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560835.v1
title: Appendix D. Plot of data and fitted estimates of site-specific abundance for goliath grouper and mutton snapper.

description: Plot of data and fitted estimates of site-specific abundance for goliath grouper and mutton snapper.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560832
title: Supplement 1. Code necessary for replicating the simulation analysis included in this study.

description: File List Sim_test--for_supplements.R (MD5: 2efc9a4718adb22d7c0d346a44176211) Fn_models--for_supplements.R (MD5: 5052b921baa24149ea4e24533b3ef630) Description Sim_test--for_supplements.R – File containing R script used to run simulation experiment comparing the estimation performance of the demographic (Dail-Madsen) and generalized-linear mixed models (GLMM). Fn_models--for_supplements.R – File containing R functions used by "Sim_test--for_supplements.R" file, which is called by "Sim_test--for_supplements.R" to source them into local memory. These functions include (1) the function for writing .bug files that define the model structure for each candidate model; (2) the function generating initial values for each function; (3) and a function for parallelizing JAGS code.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560829
title: Appendix A. Variance inflation factors (VIF) of the variables used in the full model.

description: Variance inflation factors (VIF) of the variables used in the full model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560829.v1
title: Appendix A. Variance inflation factors (VIF) of the variables used in the full model.

description: Variance inflation factors (VIF) of the variables used in the full model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560826
title: Appendix B. Details for the model selection steps.

description: Details for the model selection steps.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560826.v1
title: Appendix B. Details for the model selection steps.

description: Details for the model selection steps.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560823
title: Appendix C. Mammal Ixodes scapularis hosts (compiled by L. A. Durden) used in this analysis.

description: Mammal Ixodes scapularis hosts (compiled by L. A. Durden) used in this analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560823.v1
title: Appendix C. Mammal Ixodes scapularis hosts (compiled by L. A. Durden) used in this analysis.

description: Mammal Ixodes scapularis hosts (compiled by L. A. Durden) used in this analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560820
title: Appendix A. Number of Maieta guianensis (Melastomataceae) in demographic plots located in each combination of canopy cover and topography.

description: Number of Maieta guianensis (Melastomataceae) in demographic plots located in each combination of canopy cover and topography.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560820.v1
title: Appendix A. Number of Maieta guianensis (Melastomataceae) in demographic plots located in each combination of canopy cover and topography.

description: Number of Maieta guianensis (Melastomataceae) in demographic plots located in each combination of canopy cover and topography.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560817
title: Appendix B. Candidate models of Maieta guianensis demographic functions and the results of model fitting.

description: Candidate models of Maieta guianensis demographic functions and the results of model fitting.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560817.v1
title: Appendix B. Candidate models of Maieta guianensis demographic functions and the results of model fitting.

description: Candidate models of Maieta guianensis demographic functions and the results of model fitting.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560814
title: Appendix C. Results of life table response experiments and the contribution of each size class to differences in population growth rate (i.e., Δλ) for each ant–plant partner combination.

description: Results of life table response experiments and the contribution of each size class to differences in population growth rate (i.e., Δλ) for each ant–plant partner combination.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560814.v1
title: Appendix C. Results of life table response experiments and the contribution of each size class to differences in population growth rate (i.e., Δλ) for each ant–plant partner combination.

description: Results of life table response experiments and the contribution of each size class to differences in population growth rate (i.e., Δλ) for each ant–plant partner combination.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560811
title: Data Paper. Data Paper

description: File List zooplankton_abundance_data.csv (MD5: 9d7672c32a4d2fe805cc91f081877e1b) zooplankton_metadata.csv (MD5: 806bcd4109502706633c1bf61d2f3f66) Description Zooplankton are the key trophic link between primary producers and fish in pelagic ecosystems. Historically, there are few zooplankton time series in Australia, with no data sets longer than two years prior to 2008. Here we compile 98 676 abundance records of more than 1000 zooplankton taxa from unpublished research cruises, student projects, published literature, and the recent integrated marine observing system (IMOS). This data set covers the entire coastal and shelf region of Australia and dates back to 1938. Most records are for copepods, but there are also data for other taxa such as decapods, chaetognaths, thaliaceans, appendicularians, and cladocerans. Metadata are provided for each record, including dates, coordinates, and information on mesh size and sampling methods. To facilitate analysis across the multiple data sets, we have updated the species names according to the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) and converted units to abundance per cubic meter. These data will be valuable for studies of biodiversity, biogeography, impacts of climate change, and ecosystem health. We encourage researchers holding additional Australian zooplankton data to contact us and contribute their data to the data set so we can periodically publish updates. <i>Key words</i>: <i>biogeography; continuous plankton recorder; copepod; diversity; integrated marine observing system (IMOS); plankton; species richness; zooplankton abundance.</i>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560811.v1
title: Data Paper. Data Paper

description: File List zooplankton_abundance_data.csv (MD5: 9d7672c32a4d2fe805cc91f081877e1b) zooplankton_metadata.csv (MD5: 806bcd4109502706633c1bf61d2f3f66) Description Zooplankton are the key trophic link between primary producers and fish in pelagic ecosystems. Historically, there are few zooplankton time series in Australia, with no data sets longer than two years prior to 2008. Here we compile 98 676 abundance records of more than 1000 zooplankton taxa from unpublished research cruises, student projects, published literature, and the recent integrated marine observing system (IMOS). This data set covers the entire coastal and shelf region of Australia and dates back to 1938. Most records are for copepods, but there are also data for other taxa such as decapods, chaetognaths, thaliaceans, appendicularians, and cladocerans. Metadata are provided for each record, including dates, coordinates, and information on mesh size and sampling methods. To facilitate analysis across the multiple data sets, we have updated the species names according to the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) and converted units to abundance per cubic meter. These data will be valuable for studies of biodiversity, biogeography, impacts of climate change, and ecosystem health. We encourage researchers holding additional Australian zooplankton data to contact us and contribute their data to the data set so we can periodically publish updates. <i>Key words</i>: <i>biogeography; continuous plankton recorder; copepod; diversity; integrated marine observing system (IMOS); plankton; species richness; zooplankton abundance.</i>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560808
title: Appendix A. tRFLP analysis laboratory methodology.

description: tRFLP analysis laboratory methodology.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560808.v1
title: Appendix A. tRFLP analysis laboratory methodology.

description: tRFLP analysis laboratory methodology.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560805
title: Appendix B. Supplemental analyses: bacterial communities.

description: Supplemental analyses: bacterial communities.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560805.v1
title: Appendix B. Supplemental analyses: bacterial communities.

description: Supplemental analyses: bacterial communities.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560802
title: Appendix C. Supplemental analyses: fungal communities.

description: Supplemental analyses: fungal communities.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560802.v1
title: Appendix C. Supplemental analyses: fungal communities.

description: Supplemental analyses: fungal communities.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560799
title: Appendix A. Seed mass as a function of mericarp diameter.

description: Seed mass as a function of mericarp diameter.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560796
title: Appendix A. Climate of the study area located near Portal, Arizona, USA.

description: Climate of the study area located near Portal, Arizona, USA.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560793
title: Appendix A. Summary of the main climatic and ecological characteristics of the soil sampling sites along the elevational gradient on Changbai Mountain.

description: Summary of the main climatic and ecological characteristics of the soil sampling sites along the elevational gradient on Changbai Mountain.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560796.v1
title: Appendix A. Climate of the study area located near Portal, Arizona, USA.

description: Climate of the study area located near Portal, Arizona, USA.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560793.v1
title: Appendix A. Summary of the main climatic and ecological characteristics of the soil sampling sites along the elevational gradient on Changbai Mountain.

description: Summary of the main climatic and ecological characteristics of the soil sampling sites along the elevational gradient on Changbai Mountain.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560790
title: Appendix B. Soil characteristics on Changbai Mountain.

description: Soil characteristics on Changbai Mountain.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560790.v1
title: Appendix B. Soil characteristics on Changbai Mountain.

description: Soil characteristics on Changbai Mountain.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560787
title: Appendix C. Number of sequence reads and operational taxonomic units (OTUs).

description: Number of sequence reads and operational taxonomic units (OTUs).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560787.v1
title: Appendix C. Number of sequence reads and operational taxonomic units (OTUs).

description: Number of sequence reads and operational taxonomic units (OTUs).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560784
title: Appendix D. Relative average abundances of phyla classified with BLAST taxonomy across all soils and soils grouped into different elevation categories.

description: Relative average abundances of phyla classified with BLAST taxonomy across all soils and soils grouped into different elevation categories.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560784.v1
title: Appendix D. Relative average abundances of phyla classified with BLAST taxonomy across all soils and soils grouped into different elevation categories.

description: Relative average abundances of phyla classified with BLAST taxonomy across all soils and soils grouped into different elevation categories.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560781
title: Appendix E. Proportional abundances of phyla classified with BLAST taxonomy across all soils and soils grouped into different elevation categories.

description: Proportional abundances of phyla classified with BLAST taxonomy across all soils and soils grouped into different elevation categories.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560781.v1
title: Appendix E. Proportional abundances of phyla classified with BLAST taxonomy across all soils and soils grouped into different elevation categories.

description: Proportional abundances of phyla classified with BLAST taxonomy across all soils and soils grouped into different elevation categories.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560778
title: Appendix F. Correlations between the relative abundances of the main protistan phyla and soil and site characteristics.

description: Correlations between the relative abundances of the main protistan phyla and soil and site characteristics.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560778.v1
title: Appendix F. Correlations between the relative abundances of the main protistan phyla and soil and site characteristics.

description: Correlations between the relative abundances of the main protistan phyla and soil and site characteristics.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560775
title: Appendix G. Pearson correlations (r) between community (total eukaryotes, fungi, protists) richness (number of OTUs) and diversity (Chao1, Faith’s PD) and soil and site characteristics.

description: Pearson correlations (r) between community (total eukaryotes, fungi, protists) richness (number of OTUs) and diversity (Chao1, Faith’s PD) and soil and site characteristics.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560775.v1
title: Appendix G. Pearson correlations (r) between community (total eukaryotes, fungi, protists) richness (number of OTUs) and diversity (Chao1, Faith’s PD) and soil and site characteristics.

description: Pearson correlations (r) between community (total eukaryotes, fungi, protists) richness (number of OTUs) and diversity (Chao1, Faith’s PD) and soil and site characteristics.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560772
title: Appendix H. Hierarchical clustering tree for total eukaryotic communities.

description: Hierarchical clustering tree for total eukaryotic communities.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560772.v1
title: Appendix H. Hierarchical clustering tree for total eukaryotic communities.

description: Hierarchical clustering tree for total eukaryotic communities.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560769
title: Appendix I. Relative abundances of the dominant (A) fungal and (B) protists groups at each of the six individual sampling locations along the elevational gradient on Changbai Mountain in northeast China.

description: Relative abundances of the dominant (A) fungal and (B) protists groups at each of the six individual sampling locations along the elevational gradient on Changbai Mountain in northeast China.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560769.v1
title: Appendix I. Relative abundances of the dominant (A) fungal and (B) protists groups at each of the six individual sampling locations along the elevational gradient on Changbai Mountain in northeast China.

description: Relative abundances of the dominant (A) fungal and (B) protists groups at each of the six individual sampling locations along the elevational gradient on Changbai Mountain in northeast China.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560766
title: Appendix J. A three-dimensional plot of PCoA analysis of unweighted UniFrac distances of (A) fungal communities and (B) protistan communities comparing all 24 samples from the six different elevations on Changbai Mountain.

description: A three-dimensional plot of PCoA analysis of unweighted UniFrac distances of (A) fungal communities and (B) protistan communities comparing all 24 samples from the six different elevations on Changbai Mountain.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560766.v1
title: Appendix J. A three-dimensional plot of PCoA analysis of unweighted UniFrac distances of (A) fungal communities and (B) protistan communities comparing all 24 samples from the six different elevations on Changbai Mountain.

description: A three-dimensional plot of PCoA analysis of unweighted UniFrac distances of (A) fungal communities and (B) protistan communities comparing all 24 samples from the six different elevations on Changbai Mountain.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560763
title: Appendix K. Species diversity (Shannon index) of plant communities across the elevational gradient.

description: Species diversity (Shannon index) of plant communities across the elevational gradient.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560760
title: Appendix A. Statistics, water nitrate concentrations, and water temperature.

description: Statistics, water nitrate concentrations, and water temperature.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560763.v1
title: Appendix K. Species diversity (Shannon index) of plant communities across the elevational gradient.

description: Species diversity (Shannon index) of plant communities across the elevational gradient.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560760.v1
title: Appendix A. Statistics, water nitrate concentrations, and water temperature.

description: Statistics, water nitrate concentrations, and water temperature.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560757
title: Appendix A. Best fit parameters and model comparison for Case Studies 1, 2, and 3 (Tables A1 –A3); empirical histograms and best fit probability mass functions comparing the Poisson, Generalized Poisson, Negative Binomial, and Conway-Maxwell Poisson distribution fits for Case Studies 1 and 2 (Fig. A1); and point patterns from Jeltsch Fig. 7 used in Case Study 2 (Fig. A2).

description: Best fit parameters and model comparison for Case Studies 1, 2, and 3 (Tables A1 –A3); empirical histograms and best fit probability mass functions comparing the Poisson, Generalized Poisson, Negative Binomial, and Conway-Maxwell Poisson distribution fits for Case Studies 1 and 2 (Fig. A1); and point patterns from Jeltsch Fig. 7 used in Case Study 2 (Fig. A2).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560757.v1
title: Appendix A. Best fit parameters and model comparison for Case Studies 1, 2, and 3 (Tables A1 –A3); empirical histograms and best fit probability mass functions comparing the Poisson, Generalized Poisson, Negative Binomial, and Conway-Maxwell Poisson distribution fits for Case Studies 1 and 2 (Fig. A1); and point patterns from Jeltsch Fig. 7 used in Case Study 2 (Fig. A2).

description: Best fit parameters and model comparison for Case Studies 1, 2, and 3 (Tables A1 –A3); empirical histograms and best fit probability mass functions comparing the Poisson, Generalized Poisson, Negative Binomial, and Conway-Maxwell Poisson distribution fits for Case Studies 1 and 2 (Fig. A1); and point patterns from Jeltsch Fig. 7 used in Case Study 2 (Fig. A2).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560754
title: Appendix B. Probability mass functions and R code to fit the Poisson, Negative Binomial, Generalized Poisson, and CMP distributions (and their zero-truncated versions).

description: Probability mass functions and R code to fit the Poisson, Negative Binomial, Generalized Poisson, and CMP distributions (and their zero-truncated versions).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560751
title: Appendix A. A table showing seed production of Saussurea nigrescens depends strongly on animal pollinators.

description: A table showing seed production of Saussurea nigrescens depends strongly on animal pollinators.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3560748
title: Appendix B. A diagram showing the relative position of apiaries, roads, transects, sampling sites, and the bee density gradient for the nectar measurements in Saussurea nigrescens.

description: A diagram showing the relative position of apiaries, roads, transects, sampling sites, and the bee density gradient for the nectar measurements in Saussurea nigrescens.