cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/azvm5x
title: TTalk: Vernon

description: Turk Talk case for Michelle Cullen mental health nursing course.
description: This is an OpenLabyrinth virtual scenario. You can simply play the scenario, using the URL attached. The zip file can be imported into an OpenLabyrinth v3 or v4 server of your own. You can then edit and modify the scenario for your own purposes.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/b3y1gz
title: Replication Data for: Why Do Practitioners Want to Connect with Researchers? Evidence from a Field Experiment

description: Researchers often want to increase the broader societal impact of their work. One way to do that is to discuss research findings directly with practitioners. Yet such interactions are voluntary and do not regularly arise, which raises a key demand question: Under what conditions do practitioners want to connect with researchers? In this paper I show that relational considerations affect these decisions – that is, what practitioners expect the interaction will be like. I partner with a US-based civic association to conduct a field experiment. I find that chapter leaders in this association are more likely to speak with researchers after learning that the researchers will (a) efficiently share information during the interaction and (b) value practitioners’ knowledge. The results provide actionable guidance for how researchers should approach practitioners, and also demonstrate one powerful way that social science evidence can inform efforts to bridge research and practice.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/faeen2
title: Statement Regarding the Memorandum of Understanding with Armenia Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation In The Earth Sciences Signed At Reston and Yerevan June 4, 2010 and July 29, 2011. Entered Into Force July 29, 2011

description: TIAS 11-729

First signed 06/04/2010
Last signed 07/29/2011
Entry into force (supplemented by last signed) 07/29/2011

CAR 2011-0159

stamped 2011-0159

C06545602

cover memo
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/1mpdky
title: Examples of artificial intelligence applications and methods of using them in Arab universities

description: Artificial intelligence tools are among the most prominent features of the contemporary digital revolution that the worlds of computing and digitization have experienced, and the extent to which humanity has utilized these developments and kept pace with this qualitative leap. AI tools have diversified and covered all aspects and scientific disciplines: some specialize in editing and creating video and audio clips, some can create and edit images with remarkable results, others specialize in medical and theoretical sciences, and some focus on the humanities and the media sector.

Our research addresses some of these AI tools that operate in the field of media with its various specializations, functions, and areas. First, we will discuss what artificial intelligence is and how it works. In the second section, we will explore several of these tools, including how to access and use them with illustrative examples. Then, we will discuss the intended significance of these tools and the profound impact they have on developing and modernizing the media system across the Arab world.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/1n7klq
title: Replication data for: Styles of Regulatory Discretion: A Comparative Analysis of the British and Israeli Education Legislation

description: The data and code allow replicating all the results reported in the manuscript.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/1oozhq
title: A87_1223.jpg

description: Link to OCHRE database: &lt;a href = 'http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/589ba58e-0ae3-7168-ef52-59881b7b99bb'&gt;http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/589ba58e-0ae3-7168-ef52-59881b7b99bb
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/azxyib
title: Replication Data for: Lawyer Rankings Either Do Not Matter for Litigation Outcomes or Are Redundant

description: I investigate the success of litigants in tax cases in England and Wales between 1996 and 2010. I explore the effect upon success of having better-ranked legal representation, according to rankings of barristers published by Chambers. I find that, for a variety of model specifications, there is no significant positive effect of having better-ranked legal representation. After conducting a sensitivity analysis, I conclude that better-ranked legal representation might have a positive effect on litigation outcomes, but only if better-ranked lawyers receive cases that are substantially more difficult to win. However, if better-ranked lawyers receive substantially more difficult cases, this suggests consumers of legal representation are sophisticated enough to dispense with legal rankings.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/gke1fd
title: California Poll: 6206 -- October 30 - November 1, 1962

description: The Field Poll, established in 1945 as The California Poll by Mervin Field, has operated continuously as an independent, non-partisan, media-sponsored public opinion news service. Each year the Field Polls cover a wide range of political and social topics examining California public opinion. Continuing measures are made of voter support for leading political figures vying for major state and federal offices, job ratings of important political figures and reactions to significant political events. Voter awareness, understanding and predispositions of major campaign issues and salient statewide ballot propositions are also tracked over time. For poll 6206 N=1572.
description: Subject: STANDARD DEPOSIT TERMS 1.0 Type: DATAPASS:TERMS:STANDARD:1.0 Notes: The UCLA Social Science Data Archive (“the Archive”) gives permission and any required licenses to Data-PASS to make the Content available for archiving, preservation and access (with permission of the Archive), within the Data Preservation Alliance for the Social Sciences ("Data-PASS") in accordance with the Data-PASS terms (the "Terms") of use (available from: http://www.icpsr.org/Data-PASS). Including permission to: (a) redisseminate copies of the Data Collection in a variety of distribution formats only according to the standard terms of use of the Archive; (b) promote and advertise the Data Collection in any publicity (in any form) for Data-PASS and the Archive; (c) describe, catalog, validate and document the Content; (d) store, translate, copy or re-format the Data Collection in any way to ensure its future preservation and accessibility, improve usability and/or protect respondent confidentiality; (e) incorporate metadata (cataloging information) or documentation regarding this study into public access catalogues. The Archive represents and warrants that the Content conforms to all Terms and that the Archive is lawfully entitled and has full authority to license Data-Pass to use the Materials in the ways described in the Terms.;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/vqbhe
title: Passed Acts; St. 1855, c.489, SC1/series 229, Petition of Ferdinand Burley

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Fugitive slave laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10670469"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10670469&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Wales &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Charles W. Slack, Boston; committee on federal relations &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Ferdinand Burley&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Thomas Vizard&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Lyman A. Fisk&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Referred to the committee on federal relations &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 33 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Referred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 32 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Other male signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, legal voters, not voters, ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: St. 1855, c.489, passed May 21, 1855 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/1jnpua
title: Replication Data for: "Why Do Previous Choices Matter for Hospital Demand? Decomposing Switching Costs from Unobserved Preferences"

description: Replication Data for: "Why Do Previous Choices Matter for Hospital Demand? Decomposing Switching Costs from Unobserved Preferences"
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/1n2s2c
title: Wright Files I-Z Edited; Docketed Case: 20749
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/1osb8a
title: A15_28549.jpg

description: Link to OCHRE database: &lt;a href = 'http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/4f0c4985-2a60-42b4-af7d-9d31c59300cb'&gt;http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/4f0c4985-2a60-42b4-af7d-9d31c59300cb
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/vsn1o0
title: Replication data for Status Deficits and War, International Organization, 70/3: 513-550.

description: Replication data for Status Deficits and War, International Organization, 70/3: 513-550.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/1nnnvd
title: A98_10166.jpg

description: Link to OCHRE database: &lt;a href = 'http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/17e0a663-bdb4-562a-909a-722a1061a986'&gt;http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/17e0a663-bdb4-562a-909a-722a1061a986
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/1oiniu
title: California Poll: 7902 -- May 3-15, 1979

description: The Field Poll, established in 1945 as The California Poll by Mervin Field, has operated continuously as an independent, non-partisan, media-sponsored public opinion news service. Each year the Field Polls cover a wide range of political and social topics examining California public opinion. Continuing measures are made of voter support for leading political figures vying for major state and federal offices, job ratings of important political figures and reactions to significant political events. Voter awareness, understanding and predispositions of major campaign issues and salient statewide ballot propositions are also tracked over time. For poll 7902 N=979.
description: Subject: STANDARD DEPOSIT TERMS 1.0 Type: DATAPASS:TERMS:STANDARD:1.0 Notes: The UCLA Social Science Data Archive (“the Archive”) gives permission and any required licenses to Data-PASS to make the Content available for archiving, preservation and access (with permission of the Archive), within the Data Preservation Alliance for the Social Sciences ("Data-PASS") in accordance with the Data-PASS terms (the "Terms") of use (available from: http://www.icpsr.org/Data-PASS). Including permission to: (a) redisseminate copies of the Data Collection in a variety of distribution formats only according to the standard terms of use of the Archive; (b) promote and advertise the Data Collection in any publicity (in any form) for Data-PASS and the Archive; (c) describe, catalog, validate and document the Content; (d) store, translate, copy or re-format the Data Collection in any way to ensure its future preservation and accessibility, improve usability and/or protect respondent confidentiality; (e) incorporate metadata (cataloging information) or documentation regarding this study into public access catalogues. The Archive represents and warrants that the Content conforms to all Terms and that the Archive is lawfully entitled and has full authori
ty to license Data-Pass to use the Materials in the ways described in the Terms.;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/byzdye
title: Replication Data for: The Foreign Policy Attitudes of Indian Elites: Variance, Structure, and Common Denominators

description: Foreign policy beliefs systems have received much attention. Yet nearly all work examines attitudes in western democracies, chiefly the United States. The current security environment, however,
 requires we ask whether the foreign policy views of individuals in 
other nations—particularly regional powers such as the BRICs—are similar in structure to those found in the U.S. case. This article does so for the Indian case. Drawing on studies of U.S. opinion, we develop a set of claims and test them on an original dataset on Indian elites. We make four contributions. First, we show that Wittkopf’s MICI framework applies to the Indian case. Second, we demonstrate how this framework can be made more generally applicable by revising its emphases on different types of internationalism and on rethinking the meaning of isolationist 
preferences. Third, we place the Indian case in comparative perspective. And lastly, we model the dimensions of Indian attitudes as a function of domestic ideology. Results of our analyses provide 
insights into the structure of foreign policy belief systems outside 
the Global North.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/c28qij
title: Replication Data for: Mason et al., submitted to JSWC

description: &lt;p&gt;This data set contains APEX files for the WIL2 model in Mason et al., submitted to Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The climate statistics files correspond to the WIL2 climate scenarios as follows:
&lt;ul&gt;
 &lt;li&gt; BTV_80_09.WP1: "Baseline"&lt;/li&gt;
 &lt;li&gt; BTV_warme.WP1: "Warmer"&lt;/li&gt;
 &lt;li&gt; BTV_plus.WP1: "Wetter"&lt;/li&gt;
 &lt;li&gt; BTV_wetSp.WP1: "Wet Spring"&lt;/li&gt;
 &lt;li&gt; BTV_inten.WP1: "Intense Rain"&lt;/li&gt;
 &lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The APEX1501 executable is required for reproducing these simulations. It can be found here: https://epicapex.tamu.edu/model-executables/&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/gkata
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1843, Docket 11312, SC1/series 231, Petition of Eli F. Webster

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Abolition of capital punishment &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13481674"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13481674&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Chelmsford &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Paul Kittredge, Chelmsford; committee on the subject thereof &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Eli F. Webster&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;William Fletcher&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;John Bartlett&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1843-02-22,1843-02-22 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on February 22, 1843 and referred to the committee on the subject thereof and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on February 22, 1843 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 37 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 37 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: inhabitants, ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1843, Docket 11312 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/vwo4ap
title: Replication data for: Pre-Electoral Coalitions in Comparative Perspective: A Test of Existing Hypotheses, Electoral Studies 2005

description: Despite the vast coalition literature, pre-electoral coalitions have never been at the center of any systematic, cross-national research. Given their prevalence and potential
 impact on government composition and policies, this represents a serious omission in our knowledge of coalitions. I begin to remedy this situation by testing two hypotheses found in the literature on party coalitions. The first is that pre-electoral coalitions are more likely to form in disproportional systems if there is a sufficiently large number of parties. The second is that pre-electoral coalitions are more likely to form if voters face high uncertainty about the identity of future governments. These hypotheses are tested using a new dataset comprising legislative elections in 22 advanced industrialized countries between 1946 and 1998. The results of the statistical analysis support the first hypothesis, but not the second.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/1ofiyo
title: Passed Acts; St. 1843, c.69, SC1/series 229

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Great Massachusetts Petition &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13448109"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13448109&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Cummington &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 255 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Unidentified signatures: 255 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: George Latimer [note: this data reflects the information on the spreadsheet submitted by Henry I. Bowditch and William F. Channing to the legislature, which was filed with St. 1843, c.69, passed April 26, 1843. The majority of the Great Massachusetts Petition has not been located.] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: St. 1843, c.69, passed April 26, 1843 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/b2egf3
title: International Influences on Nonviolent and Violent Contention

description: How do international actors influence dissidents’ decisions whether to challenge their states using violent means, nonviolence, both or neither? We argue that the presence of important actors affects dissident decisions to engage in violent or nonviolent contention by affecting whether dissidents expect that governments will repress or concede to dissident demands in response to this contention. We examine the effect of two prominent types of actors—powerful states with close ties to the government and Highly Structured Inter-Governmental Organizations (HSIGOs) on dissident behavior in all national level elections in Africa from 2000-2012. Using integrated data drawn from four leading conflict events datasets, we find that dissidents are less likely to engage in violent contention when their government receives higher levels of military aid from the United States and in former French colonies, and more likely to engage in both violent and nonviolent contention when their state is a member of a greater number of HSIGOs.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/jzgaq
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1851, Docket 13162, SC1/series 231, Petition of J.F. Clark

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Fugitive slave laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858231"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858231&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Sandwich &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Joint committee on slavery &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;J.F. Clark&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Thomas Blackwell&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Mary Ann Mash&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1851-02-05,1851-02-06 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the Senate on February 5, 1851 and referred to the joint committee on slavery and sent for concurrence and received in the House on February 6, 1851 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 73 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 59 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 9 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Other male signatures: 3 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Unidentified signatures: 2 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: inhabitants, legal voters, other persons, [females], [other males], ["voters"], ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1851, Docket 13162 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/1mvmn6
title: Replication Data for: Supportive Management Practice and Intrinsic Motivation Go Together in the Public Service (PNAS 2021)

description: This archive contains the supplementary materials for this article, published in PNAS 2021, including the appendix, replication data, replication code, and codebook.