cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.951933
title: Attention points from ROV survey PS122/2_24-97 on 2020-02-15, survey 1

description: Attention points as logged by the operators in the recording software Spot.On for remotely operated vehicle (ROV) surveys during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition between November 2019 and September 2020.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.951947
title: Attention points from ROV survey PS122/3_35-32 on 2020-04-07, survey 1

description: Attention points as logged by the operators in the recording software Spot.On for remotely operated vehicle (ROV) surveys during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition between November 2019 and September 2020.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.419687
title: Hourly delayed mode sea level from coastal tide gauge station Kanton-A in 1959
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.952702
title: Positioning and telemetry from ROV survey PS122/2_18-19 on 2019-12-31, survey 1

description: The horizontal position of the remotely operated vehicle (ROV) during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition between November 2019 and September 2020 was measured using an acoustic Long Base Line (LBL) positioning system (LinkQuest Pinpoint). The position was recorded in the SPOT.ON survey systems software (OceanModulesTM). The track was smoothed from initial acoustic fixes and cleaned for most obvious outliers. The position is in a floe-fixed, relative coordinate system (X, Y) with the origin (X=0 m, Y=0 m) at the ROV hole. A quality flag for the position is introduced based on the time to the closest fix with “1” indicating good positon (fix reached &lt;= 3s), “2” medium position (fix reached &gt; 3s & &lt;= 5s), and “3” bad position (fix reached &gt; 5s). Depending on the scientific aim, a position with quality flag “3” can still be useful. Vehicle depth was measured by the integrated pressure sensor and calibrated to 0 during pre-survey procedures, when the top side of the vehicle was at the same level as the water surface. Vehicle attitude (roll, pitch, heading) was measured with an onboard inertial measuring unit (IMU, Microstrain) with three axis accelerometer, magnetometer and gyroscope. Depth was measured by a pressure sensor (Keller A-21Y, Keller AG) included in the main electronics housing of the ROV.
description: Horizontal position (X,Y):• Leg 1: Scale factors and offsets to successfully improve positions for surveys PS122_1_5_62_20191102_1 and PS122_1_6_16_20191105_1 were obtained by comparing positions of markers from the ROV and a terrestrial laser scanner (RIEGL). Scale factors and offsets for surveys PS122_1_6_31_20191106_1, PS122_1_6_118_20191110_1, PS122_1_7_18_20191112_1, PS122_1_7_55_20191113_1 are based on estimates but will be improved also using markers.• Leg 4: Positions for surveys PS122_4_48_213_20200726_1 and PS122_4_49_105_20200728_1 are partly distorted probably due to usage of drifting transponder(s) or erroneous transponder position configuration. Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.• Leg 5: probably due to drifting transponder(s). Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.840624
title: Meteorological synoptical observations from station Minamitorishima (2014-10)
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.419788
title: Hourly delayed mode sea level from coastal tide gauge station Ketchikan in 1989
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.421534
title: Hourly delayed mode sea level from coastal tide gauge station Suva in 1986
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.952743
title: Positioning and telemetry from ROV survey PS122/3_38-91 on 2020-05-02, survey 1

description: The horizontal position of the remotely operated vehicle (ROV) during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition between November 2019 and September 2020 was measured using an acoustic Long Base Line (LBL) positioning system (LinkQuest Pinpoint). The position was recorded in the SPOT.ON survey systems software (OceanModulesTM). The track was smoothed from initial acoustic fixes and cleaned for most obvious outliers. The position is in a floe-fixed, relative coordinate system (X, Y) with the origin (X=0 m, Y=0 m) at the ROV hole. A quality flag for the position is introduced based on the time to the closest fix with “1” indicating good positon (fix reached &lt;= 3s), “2” medium position (fix reached &gt; 3s & &lt;= 5s), and “3” bad position (fix reached &gt; 5s). Depending on the scientific aim, a position with quality flag “3” can still be useful. Vehicle depth was measured by the integrated pressure sensor and calibrated to 0 during pre-survey procedures, when the top side of the vehicle was at the same level as the water surface. Vehicle attitude (roll, pitch, heading) was measured with an onboard inertial measuring unit (IMU, Microstrain) with three axis accelerometer, magnetometer and gyroscope. Depth was measured by a pressure sensor (Keller A-21Y, Keller AG) included in the main electronics housing of the ROV.
description: Horizontal position (X,Y):• Leg 1: Scale factors and offsets to successfully improve positions for surveys PS122_1_5_62_20191102_1 and PS122_1_6_16_20191105_1 were obtained by comparing positions of markers from the ROV and a terrestrial laser scanner (RIEGL). Scale factors and offsets for surveys PS122_1_6_31_20191106_1, PS122_1_6_118_20191110_1, PS122_1_7_18_20191112_1, PS122_1_7_55_20191113_1 are based on estimates but will be improved also using markers.• Leg 4: Positions for surveys PS122_4_48_213_20200726_1 and PS122_4_49_105_20200728_1 are partly distorted probably due to usage of drifting transponder(s) or erroneous transponder position configuration. Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.• Leg 5: probably due to drifting transponder(s). Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.324966
title: Water temperature real-time profiles from cruise 2185000 (DCQC)

description: For definition of quality flags see hdl:10013/epic.31518.d001
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.952739
title: Positioning and telemetry from ROV survey PS122/3_37-108 on 2020-04-25, survey 1

description: The horizontal position of the remotely operated vehicle (ROV) during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition between November 2019 and September 2020 was measured using an acoustic Long Base Line (LBL) positioning system (LinkQuest Pinpoint). The position was recorded in the SPOT.ON survey systems software (OceanModulesTM). The track was smoothed from initial acoustic fixes and cleaned for most obvious outliers. The position is in a floe-fixed, relative coordinate system (X, Y) with the origin (X=0 m, Y=0 m) at the ROV hole. A quality flag for the position is introduced based on the time to the closest fix with “1” indicating good positon (fix reached &lt;= 3s), “2” medium position (fix reached &gt; 3s & &lt;= 5s), and “3” bad position (fix reached &gt; 5s). Depending on the scientific aim, a position with quality flag “3” can still be useful. Vehicle depth was measured by the integrated pressure sensor and calibrated to 0 during pre-survey procedures, when the top side of the vehicle was at the same level as the water surface. Vehicle attitude (roll, pitch, heading) was measured with an onboard inertial measuring unit (IMU, Microstrain) with three axis accelerometer, magnetometer and gyroscope. Depth was measured by a pressure sensor (Keller A-21Y, Keller AG) included in the main electronics housing of the ROV.
description: Horizontal position (X,Y):• Leg 1: Scale factors and offsets to successfully improve positions for surveys PS122_1_5_62_20191102_1 and PS122_1_6_16_20191105_1 were obtained by comparing positions of markers from the ROV and a terrestrial laser scanner (RIEGL). Scale factors and offsets for surveys PS122_1_6_31_20191106_1, PS122_1_6_118_20191110_1, PS122_1_7_18_20191112_1, PS122_1_7_55_20191113_1 are based on estimates but will be improved also using markers.• Leg 4: Positions for surveys PS122_4_48_213_20200726_1 and PS122_4_49_105_20200728_1 are partly distorted probably due to usage of drifting transponder(s) or erroneous transponder position configuration. Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.• Leg 5: probably due to drifting transponder(s). Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.952740
title: Positioning and telemetry from ROV survey PS122/3_37-20 on 2020-04-21, survey 2

description: The horizontal position of the remotely operated vehicle (ROV) during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition between November 2019 and September 2020 was measured using an acoustic Long Base Line (LBL) positioning system (LinkQuest Pinpoint). The position was recorded in the SPOT.ON survey systems software (OceanModulesTM). The track was smoothed from initial acoustic fixes and cleaned for most obvious outliers. The position is in a floe-fixed, relative coordinate system (X, Y) with the origin (X=0 m, Y=0 m) at the ROV hole. A quality flag for the position is introduced based on the time to the closest fix with “1” indicating good positon (fix reached &lt;= 3s), “2” medium position (fix reached &gt; 3s & &lt;= 5s), and “3” bad position (fix reached &gt; 5s). Depending on the scientific aim, a position with quality flag “3” can still be useful. Vehicle depth was measured by the integrated pressure sensor and calibrated to 0 during pre-survey procedures, when the top side of the vehicle was at the same level as the water surface. Vehicle attitude (roll, pitch, heading) was measured with an onboard inertial measuring unit (IMU, Microstrain) with three axis accelerometer, magnetometer and gyroscope. Depth was measured by a pressure sensor (Keller A-21Y, Keller AG) included in the main electronics housing of the ROV.
description: Horizontal position (X,Y):• Leg 1: Scale factors and offsets to successfully improve positions for surveys PS122_1_5_62_20191102_1 and PS122_1_6_16_20191105_1 were obtained by comparing positions of markers from the ROV and a terrestrial laser scanner (RIEGL). Scale factors and offsets for surveys PS122_1_6_31_20191106_1, PS122_1_6_118_20191110_1, PS122_1_7_18_20191112_1, PS122_1_7_55_20191113_1 are based on estimates but will be improved also using markers.• Leg 4: Positions for surveys PS122_4_48_213_20200726_1 and PS122_4_49_105_20200728_1 are partly distorted probably due to usage of drifting transponder(s) or erroneous transponder position configuration. Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.• Leg 5: probably due to drifting transponder(s). Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.952741
title: Positioning and telemetry from ROV survey PS122/3_38-50 on 2020-04-28, survey 1

description: The horizontal position of the remotely operated vehicle (ROV) during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition between November 2019 and September 2020 was measured using an acoustic Long Base Line (LBL) positioning system (LinkQuest Pinpoint). The position was recorded in the SPOT.ON survey systems software (OceanModulesTM). The track was smoothed from initial acoustic fixes and cleaned for most obvious outliers. The position is in a floe-fixed, relative coordinate system (X, Y) with the origin (X=0 m, Y=0 m) at the ROV hole. A quality flag for the position is introduced based on the time to the closest fix with “1” indicating good positon (fix reached &lt;= 3s), “2” medium position (fix reached &gt; 3s & &lt;= 5s), and “3” bad position (fix reached &gt; 5s). Depending on the scientific aim, a position with quality flag “3” can still be useful. Vehicle depth was measured by the integrated pressure sensor and calibrated to 0 during pre-survey procedures, when the top side of the vehicle was at the same level as the water surface. Vehicle attitude (roll, pitch, heading) was measured with an onboard inertial measuring unit (IMU, Microstrain) with three axis accelerometer, magnetometer and gyroscope. Depth was measured by a pressure sensor (Keller A-21Y, Keller AG) included in the main electronics housing of the ROV.
description: Horizontal position (X,Y):• Leg 1: Scale factors and offsets to successfully improve positions for surveys PS122_1_5_62_20191102_1 and PS122_1_6_16_20191105_1 were obtained by comparing positions of markers from the ROV and a terrestrial laser scanner (RIEGL). Scale factors and offsets for surveys PS122_1_6_31_20191106_1, PS122_1_6_118_20191110_1, PS122_1_7_18_20191112_1, PS122_1_7_55_20191113_1 are based on estimates but will be improved also using markers.• Leg 4: Positions for surveys PS122_4_48_213_20200726_1 and PS122_4_49_105_20200728_1 are partly distorted probably due to usage of drifting transponder(s) or erroneous transponder position configuration. Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.• Leg 5: probably due to drifting transponder(s). Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.952721
title: Positioning and telemetry from ROV survey PS122/3_29-14 on 2020-02-25, survey 1

description: The horizontal position of the remotely operated vehicle (ROV) during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition between November 2019 and September 2020 was measured using an acoustic Long Base Line (LBL) positioning system (LinkQuest Pinpoint). The position was recorded in the SPOT.ON survey systems software (OceanModulesTM). The track was smoothed from initial acoustic fixes and cleaned for most obvious outliers. The position is in a floe-fixed, relative coordinate system (X, Y) with the origin (X=0 m, Y=0 m) at the ROV hole. A quality flag for the position is introduced based on the time to the closest fix with “1” indicating good positon (fix reached &lt;= 3s), “2” medium position (fix reached &gt; 3s & &lt;= 5s), and “3” bad position (fix reached &gt; 5s). Depending on the scientific aim, a position with quality flag “3” can still be useful. Vehicle depth was measured by the integrated pressure sensor and calibrated to 0 during pre-survey procedures, when the top side of the vehicle was at the same level as the water surface. Vehicle attitude (roll, pitch, heading) was measured with an onboard inertial measuring unit (IMU, Microstrain) with three axis accelerometer, magnetometer and gyroscope. Depth was measured by a pressure sensor (Keller A-21Y, Keller AG) included in the main electronics housing of the ROV.
description: Horizontal position (X,Y):• Leg 1: Scale factors and offsets to successfully improve positions for surveys PS122_1_5_62_20191102_1 and PS122_1_6_16_20191105_1 were obtained by comparing positions of markers from the ROV and a terrestrial laser scanner (RIEGL). Scale factors and offsets for surveys PS122_1_6_31_20191106_1, PS122_1_6_118_20191110_1, PS122_1_7_18_20191112_1, PS122_1_7_55_20191113_1 are based on estimates but will be improved also using markers.• Leg 4: Positions for surveys PS122_4_48_213_20200726_1 and PS122_4_49_105_20200728_1 are partly distorted probably due to usage of drifting transponder(s) or erroneous transponder position configuration. Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.• Leg 5: probably due to drifting transponder(s). Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.952723
title: Positioning and telemetry from ROV survey PS122/3_30-69 on 2020-03-07, survey 1

description: The horizontal position of the remotely operated vehicle (ROV) during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition between November 2019 and September 2020 was measured using an acoustic Long Base Line (LBL) positioning system (LinkQuest Pinpoint). The position was recorded in the SPOT.ON survey systems software (OceanModulesTM). The track was smoothed from initial acoustic fixes and cleaned for most obvious outliers. The position is in a floe-fixed, relative coordinate system (X, Y) with the origin (X=0 m, Y=0 m) at the ROV hole. A quality flag for the position is introduced based on the time to the closest fix with “1” indicating good positon (fix reached &lt;= 3s), “2” medium position (fix reached &gt; 3s & &lt;= 5s), and “3” bad position (fix reached &gt; 5s). Depending on the scientific aim, a position with quality flag “3” can still be useful. Vehicle depth was measured by the integrated pressure sensor and calibrated to 0 during pre-survey procedures, when the top side of the vehicle was at the same level as the water surface. Vehicle attitude (roll, pitch, heading) was measured with an onboard inertial measuring unit (IMU, Microstrain) with three axis accelerometer, magnetometer and gyroscope. Depth was measured by a pressure sensor (Keller A-21Y, Keller AG) included in the main electronics housing of the ROV.
description: Horizontal position (X,Y):• Leg 1: Scale factors and offsets to successfully improve positions for surveys PS122_1_5_62_20191102_1 and PS122_1_6_16_20191105_1 were obtained by comparing positions of markers from the ROV and a terrestrial laser scanner (RIEGL). Scale factors and offsets for surveys PS122_1_6_31_20191106_1, PS122_1_6_118_20191110_1, PS122_1_7_18_20191112_1, PS122_1_7_55_20191113_1 are based on estimates but will be improved also using markers.• Leg 4: Positions for surveys PS122_4_48_213_20200726_1 and PS122_4_49_105_20200728_1 are partly distorted probably due to usage of drifting transponder(s) or erroneous transponder position configuration. Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.• Leg 5: probably due to drifting transponder(s). Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.952742
title: Positioning and telemetry from ROV survey PS122/3_38-85 on 2020-05-01, survey 1

description: The horizontal position of the remotely operated vehicle (ROV) during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition between November 2019 and September 2020 was measured using an acoustic Long Base Line (LBL) positioning system (LinkQuest Pinpoint). The position was recorded in the SPOT.ON survey systems software (OceanModulesTM). The track was smoothed from initial acoustic fixes and cleaned for most obvious outliers. The position is in a floe-fixed, relative coordinate system (X, Y) with the origin (X=0 m, Y=0 m) at the ROV hole. A quality flag for the position is introduced based on the time to the closest fix with “1” indicating good positon (fix reached &lt;= 3s), “2” medium position (fix reached &gt; 3s & &lt;= 5s), and “3” bad position (fix reached &gt; 5s). Depending on the scientific aim, a position with quality flag “3” can still be useful. Vehicle depth was measured by the integrated pressure sensor and calibrated to 0 during pre-survey procedures, when the top side of the vehicle was at the same level as the water surface. Vehicle attitude (roll, pitch, heading) was measured with an onboard inertial measuring unit (IMU, Microstrain) with three axis accelerometer, magnetometer and gyroscope. Depth was measured by a pressure sensor (Keller A-21Y, Keller AG) included in the main electronics housing of the ROV.
description: Horizontal position (X,Y):• Leg 1: Scale factors and offsets to successfully improve positions for surveys PS122_1_5_62_20191102_1 and PS122_1_6_16_20191105_1 were obtained by comparing positions of markers from the ROV and a terrestrial laser scanner (RIEGL). Scale factors and offsets for surveys PS122_1_6_31_20191106_1, PS122_1_6_118_20191110_1, PS122_1_7_18_20191112_1, PS122_1_7_55_20191113_1 are based on estimates but will be improved also using markers.• Leg 4: Positions for surveys PS122_4_48_213_20200726_1 and PS122_4_49_105_20200728_1 are partly distorted probably due to usage of drifting transponder(s) or erroneous transponder position configuration. Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.• Leg 5: probably due to drifting transponder(s). Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.952744
title: Positioning and telemetry from ROV survey PS122/3_39-152 on 2020-05-10, survey 2

description: The horizontal position of the remotely operated vehicle (ROV) during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition between November 2019 and September 2020 was measured using an acoustic Long Base Line (LBL) positioning system (LinkQuest Pinpoint). The position was recorded in the SPOT.ON survey systems software (OceanModulesTM). The track was smoothed from initial acoustic fixes and cleaned for most obvious outliers. The position is in a floe-fixed, relative coordinate system (X, Y) with the origin (X=0 m, Y=0 m) at the ROV hole. A quality flag for the position is introduced based on the time to the closest fix with “1” indicating good positon (fix reached &lt;= 3s), “2” medium position (fix reached &gt; 3s & &lt;= 5s), and “3” bad position (fix reached &gt; 5s). Depending on the scientific aim, a position with quality flag “3” can still be useful. Vehicle depth was measured by the integrated pressure sensor and calibrated to 0 during pre-survey procedures, when the top side of the vehicle was at the same level as the water surface. Vehicle attitude (roll, pitch, heading) was measured with an onboard inertial measuring unit (IMU, Microstrain) with three axis accelerometer, magnetometer and gyroscope. Depth was measured by a pressure sensor (Keller A-21Y, Keller AG) included in the main electronics housing of the ROV.
description: Horizontal position (X,Y):• Leg 1: Scale factors and offsets to successfully improve positions for surveys PS122_1_5_62_20191102_1 and PS122_1_6_16_20191105_1 were obtained by comparing positions of markers from the ROV and a terrestrial laser scanner (RIEGL). Scale factors and offsets for surveys PS122_1_6_31_20191106_1, PS122_1_6_118_20191110_1, PS122_1_7_18_20191112_1, PS122_1_7_55_20191113_1 are based on estimates but will be improved also using markers.• Leg 4: Positions for surveys PS122_4_48_213_20200726_1 and PS122_4_49_105_20200728_1 are partly distorted probably due to usage of drifting transponder(s) or erroneous transponder position configuration. Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.• Leg 5: probably due to drifting transponder(s). Retrieving suitable scale factors and offsets was not successful so far.
DOI: 10.60521/331599
title: Processed Acoustic Backscatter, Sidescan and Swath Bathymetry Data acquired during R/V Fugro Discovery Field:Marine:Transit FD201016 (2020)

description: This data set was acquired with a Kongsberg Maritime EM122 Multibeam Sonar during R/V Fugro Discovery Field:Marine:Transit FD201016 conducted in 2020 (Chief Scientist: Darrell Smith). These data files are of MBSystem-compatible format and include Acoustic Backscatter, Sidescan and Swath Bathymetry data that were processed after acquisition. This data was processed by The Nippon Foundation - GEBCO Seabed 2030 Project and was included in the Global Multi-Resolution Topography (GMRT) Synthesis (version 4.2.1).
DOI: 10.60521/331601
title: Processed Acoustic Backscatter, Sidescan and Swath Bathymetry Data acquired during R/V Thomas G. Thompson expedition TN354 (2018)

description: This data set was acquired with a Kongsberg Maritime EM302 Multibeam Sonar during R/V Thomas G. Thompson expedition TN354 conducted in 2018 (Chief Scientist: Croy Carlin). These data files are of MBSystem-compatible format and include Acoustic Backscatter, Sidescan and Swath Bathymetry data that were processed after acquisition. This data was processed by The Nippon Foundation - GEBCO Seabed 2030 Project and was included in the Global Multi-Resolution Topography (GMRT) Synthesis (version 4.2.1).