cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/di0cow
title: Replication Data for: The Great Revenue Divergence

description: This contains all the files needed to replicate every table, figure, and calculation in the text and appendix of "The Great Revenue Divergence."
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/e1s3br
title: CSV file: Supplementary Table 2

description: Supplementary Table 2. AD-associated genes as determined by Open Targets. Using the Open Targets Platform (https://www.targetvalidation.org) we searched for Alzheimer's disease and selected for genetic associations, drugs, pathways & systems biology and RNA expression. We downloaded the available genes and filtered for those with a greater than 0.1 overall score. These were used to perform gene enrichment tests. All the scores within this table are directly from the Open Targets website.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/hnfqvr
title: Replication Data for: Misinformation interventions are common, divisive, and poorly understood

description: &lt;b&gt;Paper:&lt;/b&gt; Saltz, Emily, Soubhik Barari, Claire Leibowicz, and Claire Wardle. &lt;a href="https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/misinformation-interventions-are-common-divisive-and-poorly-understood/"&gt;"Misinformation interventions are common, divisive, and poorly understood."&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review&lt;/i&gt; 2, No. 5 (2021).
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; Social media platforms label, remove, or otherwise intervene on thousands of posts containing misleading or inaccurate information every day. &lt;i&gt;Who encounters these interventions, and how do they react?&lt;/i&gt; A demographically representative survey of &lt;b&gt;1,207&lt;/b&gt; Americans reveals that &lt;b&gt;49%&lt;/b&gt; have been exposed to some form of online misinformation intervention. However, most are not well-informed about what kinds of systems, both algorithmic and human, are applying these interventions: &lt;b&gt;40%&lt;/b&gt; believe that content is mostly or all checked, and &lt;b&gt;17.5%&lt;/b&gt; are not sure, with errors attributed to biased judgment more than any other cause, across political parties. Although support for interventions differs considerably by political party, other distinct traits predict support, including trust in institutions, frequent social media usage, and exposure to “appropriate” interventions.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/jpg5yb
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 83-1406
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/oss9ib
title: Good Zucchini: An open image dataset of good Zucchinis for successful automated recognition and sorting based on produce visual characteristics.

description: Images of Good Zucchinis
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ooudmq
title: Replication Data for: Boyne/James/John/Petrovsky (2012 BJPolS): Party Control, Party Competition and Public Service Performance

description: Data and code for: Boyne, George A., Oliver James, Peter John, and Nicolai Petrovsky. 2012. "Party Control, Party Competition and Public Service Performance." British Journal of Political Science 42 (3): 641-660.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/os9qr
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1845, Docket 1588, SC1/series 230, Petition of Martin Bryant

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Abolition of capital punishment &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13481373"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13481373&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1845-01-29 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Pembroke, Hanson &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Ralph Sanger, Dover; committee on the judiciary &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Martin Bryant&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Isaac Stitson&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Ebenezer Gunney&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Daniel Josselyn&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;David Howland&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1845-02-27 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on February 27, 1845 and referred to the committee on the judiciary &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 22 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 22 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: legal voters, ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1845, Docket 1588 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/rmayn
title: Passed Acts; St. 1861, c.91, SC1/series 229, Petition of John Wright

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: For the repeal of the personal liberty laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10668878"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10668878&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1861-01-12 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Topsfield &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: William D. Northend, Essex; committee on the personal liberty laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;John Wright&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;B.P. Adams&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;N.H. Roberts&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1861-02-06,1861-02-07 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on February 6, 1861 and referred to the committee on the personal liberty laws and received in the Senate on February 7, 1861 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 144 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 144 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: legal voters, ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: St. 1861, c.91, passed March 25, 1861 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/zvj2e5
title: A12_23118.JPG

description: Link to OCHRE database: &lt;a href = ''http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/257327f7-67b6-4928-9dde-c11b42c52062'&gt;http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/257327f7-67b6-4928-9dde-c11b42c52062
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/5hd98k
title: A99_12291.jpg

description: Link to OCHRE database: &lt;a href = 'http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/802f282e-582c-3ff8-30fb-9aaafd6d1604'&gt;http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/802f282e-582c-3ff8-30fb-9aaafd6d1604
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/jkl4hw
title: MAECHAM Replication Data for: A Model Intercomparison of Stratospheric Solar Geoengineering by Accumulation-Mode Sulfate Aerosols

description: Model results from MAECHAM5-HAM use in paper A Model Intercomparison of Stratospheric Solar Geoengineering by Accumulation-Mode Sulfate Aerosols
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/logucl
title: Measurement of clinical empathy using Jefferson Scale of Empathy – Student Version in medical students in India

description: The Jefferson Scale of Empathy – Student version (JSE – S) was used to assess clinical empathy in medical undergraduate students. Informed consent was obtained prior to administration of the questionnaire to the participants. The English version of the questionnaire was used. Data regarding age, semester, gender, decision to join the undergraduate medical training, the choice of specialty and the current place of residence was also collected.
All medical undergraduate students of University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital in the year 2017, numbering 600 in total, were invited to participate in the study, and data was collected over a period of 1 month, July 2017.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/opyax5
title: Passed Acts; St. 1946, c.368, SC1/series 229, Petition of George T. Lanigan

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Racial discrimination &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25500565"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25500565&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Boston &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: George T. Lanigan, Boston; committee on state administration &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;George T. Lanigan&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;George W. Coleman&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1946-01-16,1946-01-17 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on January 16, 1946 and referred to the committee on state administration and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on January 17, 1946 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 2 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 2 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, Massachusetts Independent Voters Association, chairman &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: fair employment practice law, establishment of a commission to be known as the state fair employment practice commission, includes addresses, [many additional documents in folder] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: St. 1946, c.368, passed May 23, 1946 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/sk0lko
title: A95_7226a.jpg

description: Link to OCHRE database: &lt;a href = 'http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/1f7a476b-f9e1-dd46-f594-096b72314a56'&gt;http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/1f7a476b-f9e1-dd46-f594-096b72314a56
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/zto4kv
title: Laboratory Files

description: Laboratory Files
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/dyshod
title: Replication Data for: Penetration strategies of Turkish corporations in Kosovo’s market

description: Rapid developments and increasing competition in recent years have prevented companies from producing and selling only in domestic markets, but also causing their foreign resources and investments to be directed to foreign markets. In this case, once businesses decide to join a particular market, they have to decide which is the best way to penetrate there. Turkish multinational corporations, which have been spreading all over the world with their investments, have conquered world markets with their exports, initiatives and acquisitions, they have entered in foreign markets in various forms and have a significant share in world trade volume with their successful investments. From this point of view, this study examines the strategies by which Turkish multinationals enter foreign markets especially in Kosovo and the impact that those companies have had in the development of the Kosovo economy and the strategies by which Turkish multinationals enter foreign markets.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/hmwd50
title: Replication Data for: Referenda As Commitment Devices – An Experimental Approach

description: These are the replication data and commands for 
"Referenda As Commitment Devices – An Experimental Approach"
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/jqkva8
title: Development of a self-assessment tool for resident doctors’ communication skills in India

description: This study was conducted to develop and validate a questionnaire for the self-assessment of residents’ communication skills in India. The questionnaire was administered to 100 residents from the Departments of Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Paediatrics, and Surgery at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India and 95 completed responses were analyzed. The questionnaires were anonymized and were completed by the residents at their convenience. Data collection was conducted in April 2019.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/romac8
title: Replication data for: Comparing the Foreign Aid Policies of Presidents Bush and Obama. Social Science Quarterly. Volume 93, Issue 5, pages 1202–1217, December 2012

description: Objectives We compare the rhetoric and actual foreign economic aid disbursements of the Bush and Obama Administrations. Methods We use U.S. foreign aid data from 2001 to 2013 (expected) to test our propositions. Results Our analyses suggest strong similarities but also key differences between presidencies. First, both presidents used aid to encourage development and democracy but also ignored the human rights policies of recipient countries. We actually find human rights abuse to be positively correlated with aid receipts, even after controlling for wealth and regime type; changes in rights policies have no effect in data for either administration. Second, overall aid disbursements have not increased under President Obama in real or percentage terms, again despite campaign and inaugural promises to do otherwise. Finally, our analyses confirm the proposition that the Bush Administration favored those countries that supported the war in Iraq—the “Coalition of the Willing”—by providing them with substantially larger aid allocations than would otherwise be predicted. Conclusions The Obama Administration has seemingly reversed the unstated policy of aid payments for U.S. partnership by penalizing Coalition members with aid allocations far below the rates predicted for other, similar countries.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/xknpbo
title: Replication Data for: How Government Efficiency Shapes Political Trust: Evidence from the Case of Brexit

description: Government competence in delivering outcomes is often regarded as foundational to political trust. However, in this article, a different competence dynamic is proposed; specifically, whether political trust is related to government efficiency in achieving promised policy objectives. This article argues that when policy objectives are polarizing, the effect of efficiency on political trust is conditional on whether individuals
support or oppose the objective. Using the case of Brexit, where the promised policy objective of leaving the European Union was polarizing, it is hypothesized that Leave-voters - relative to Remain-voters - became more trusting in cases of efficiency and less trusting in cases of inefficiency. The predictions are supported through a difference-in-differences analysis of unique real-world data over time from the British Election Study. The findings have important implications for our understanding of Brexit but also inform how political trust relates to government competence in the case of polarizing political issues.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ypz6z
title: Passed Resolves; Resolves 1837, c.75, SC1/series 228, Petition of Daniel Drew

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Gag rule &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10456122"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10456122&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Watertown &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Luther Pierce, Pelham &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Daniel Drew&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Stillman Lothrop&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hiram Hosmer&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 109 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 109 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Resolves 1837, c.75, passed April 12, 1837 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/yq3zya
title: Replication data for "Medical waste management in three areas of rural China"

description: Replication data for "Medical waste management in three areas of rural China"
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/yqxg6b
title: Replication Data for: Gender Bias in Assessments of Teacher Performance

description: This package contains replication data for: "Gender Bias in Assessments of Teacher Performance." The package includes analysis data and replication files. The analysis datasets contain cleaned data from surveys given to teachers, head teachers, and students, as well as student assessments. The data was collected in 2 waves between 2017 and 2019 in schools across Ghana. The scripts, produced in Stata, contain code to replicate the table and figure in the paper. For further details on the data or how to run the code, please see the readme file.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/zsdjgt
title: Replication data for: Why Vote with the Chief? Political Connections and Public Goods Provision in Zambia

description: Why are voters influenced by the views of local patrons when casting their ballots? The existing literature suggests that coercion and personal obligations underpin this form of clientelism, causing voters to support candidates for reasons tangential to political performance. However, voters who support candidates preferred by local patrons may be making sophisticated political inferences. In many developing countries, elected politicians need to work with local patrons to deliver resources to voters, giving voters good reason to consider their patron's opinions of candidates. This argument is tested using data from an original survey of traditional chiefs and an experiment involving voters in Zambia. Chiefs and politicians with stronger relationships collaborate more effectively to provide local public goods. Furthermore, voters are particularly likely to vote with their chief if they perceive the importance of chiefs and politicians working jointly for local development.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/zsyzx
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1855, Docket 18373, SC1/series 231, Petition of Lewis Merriam

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: For the removal of Edward Greeley Loring &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858570"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858570&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Greenfield &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Luther B. Lincoln, Deerfield; committee on federal relations &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Lewis Merriam&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;James Deane&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Josiah Day&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1855-02-22 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on February 22, 1855 and referred to the committee on federal relations and sent for concurrence &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 91 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 91 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: inhabitants &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: [unique text, particularly gendered language] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1855, Docket 18373 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/dl2svy
title: 2002 Utah Colleges Exit Poll

description: Congressional races, patriotism and September 11th, Olympics, Legacy highway, Leavitt performance ratings, perception of group influence and bias, environment, gun control, candidate attributes, education, candidate favorability ratings, contact with candidates, media, and negative campaigning