cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556938
title: Appendix J. Information-theoretic analyses of logistic-regression models that had substantial support, for predicting persistence of pikas at 25 sites in the Great Basin, USA, from historic records (1898–1956) through the end of 2000s surveys.

description: Information-theoretic analyses of logistic-regression models that had substantial support, for predicting persistence of pikas at 25 sites in the Great Basin, USA, from historic records (1898–1956) through the end of 2000s surveys.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556938.v1
title: Appendix J. Information-theoretic analyses of logistic-regression models that had substantial support, for predicting persistence of pikas at 25 sites in the Great Basin, USA, from historic records (1898–1956) through the end of 2000s surveys.

description: Information-theoretic analyses of logistic-regression models that had substantial support, for predicting persistence of pikas at 25 sites in the Great Basin, USA, from historic records (1898–1956) through the end of 2000s surveys.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556935
title: Appendix K. Variable weights for the analysis in Appendix J, across all models in the a priori set.

description: Variable weights for the analysis in Appendix J, across all models in the a priori set.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556935.v1
title: Appendix K. Variable weights for the analysis in Appendix J, across all models in the a priori set.

description: Variable weights for the analysis in Appendix J, across all models in the a priori set.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556932
title: Appendix L. Photographs of a portion of each of two study sites, central Nevada, USA.

description: Photographs of a portion of each of two study sites, central Nevada, USA.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556932.v1
title: Appendix L. Photographs of a portion of each of two study sites, central Nevada, USA.

description: Photographs of a portion of each of two study sites, central Nevada, USA.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556929
title: Appendix A. Figures showing (1) locations of traps, (2) temporal variation in seed rain, (3) proportion of traps for gaps and understory and number of species, seeds, and seed mass for every functional group, (4) effects of gaps on species diversity, and (5) gap:understory ratios for absolute and relative seed arrival (species number, seed number, and seed mass) for explosively dispersed species; and tables presenting gap:understory ratios for absolute and relative seed arrival for all...

description: Figures showing (1) locations of traps, (2) temporal variation in seed rain, (3) proportion of traps for gaps and understory and number of species, seeds, and seed mass for every functional group, (4) effects of gaps on species diversity, and (5) gap:understory ratios for absolute and relative seed arrival (species number, seed number, and seed mass) for explosively dispersed species; and tables presenting gap:understory ratios for absolute and relative seed arrival for all functional groups.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556926
title: Appendix A. Supplementary site description data, including climate, soil, and vegetation characteristics.

description: Supplementary site description data, including climate, soil, and vegetation characteristics.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556923
title: Appendix B. Methods and results for soil analyses conducted at the onset of the experiment, one year, and two years after fertilization.

description: Methods and results for soil analyses conducted at the onset of the experiment, one year, and two years after fertilization.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556920
title: Appendix C. Results from repeated-measures MANOVA analyses for tree community responses to fertilization.

description: Results from repeated-measures MANOVA analyses for tree community responses to fertilization.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556917
title: Appendix D. Correlations between the two most significant soil parameters vs. within-community indicators of plant growth.

description: Correlations between the two most significant soil parameters vs. within-community indicators of plant growth.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556914
title: Appendix A. Study landscape with trap locations.

description: Study landscape with trap locations.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556914.v1
title: Appendix A. Study landscape with trap locations.

description: Study landscape with trap locations.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556911
title: Appendix B. Trap and site details.

description: Trap and site details.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556911.v1
title: Appendix B. Trap and site details.

description: Trap and site details.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556908
title: Appendix C. Life-history traits for the 87 species marked in the study.

description: Life-history traits for the 87 species marked in the study.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556905
title: Appendix D. Recapture rates and distances moved for 41 recaptured species.

description: Recapture rates and distances moved for 41 recaptured species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556902
title: Appendix E. Coefficients table for distance moved with wingspan and wing shape as wing morphology traits and adult feeding, larval feeding guild, and forest affinity as life-history traits.

description: Coefficients table for distance moved with wingspan and wing shape as wing morphology traits and adult feeding, larval feeding guild, and forest affinity as life-history traits.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556899
title: Appendix A. Photos from the study system and experimental design.

description: Photos from the study system and experimental design.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556896
title: Appendix B. The fauna, climate, and natural history of the system.

description: The fauna, climate, and natural history of the system.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556896.v1
title: Appendix B. The fauna, climate, and natural history of the system.

description: The fauna, climate, and natural history of the system.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556893
title: Appendix C. Data on surveys of arthropods from several guilds.

description: Data on surveys of arthropods from several guilds.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556893.v1
title: Appendix C. Data on surveys of arthropods from several guilds.

description: Data on surveys of arthropods from several guilds.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556890
title: Appendix D. Results of MANCOVAs.

description: Results of MANCOVAs.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556890.v1
title: Appendix D. Results of MANCOVAs.

description: Results of MANCOVAs.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556887
title: Appendix E. Data on abundance of arthropods from varying guilds collected during the experiments.

description: Data on abundance of arthropods from varying guilds collected during the experiments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556887.v1
title: Appendix E. Data on abundance of arthropods from varying guilds collected during the experiments.

description: Data on abundance of arthropods from varying guilds collected during the experiments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556884
title: Appendix F. Data on biomass of arthropods from varying guilds collected during the experiments.

description: Data on biomass of arthropods from varying guilds collected during the experiments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556884.v1
title: Appendix F. Data on biomass of arthropods from varying guilds collected during the experiments.

description: Data on biomass of arthropods from varying guilds collected during the experiments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556881
title: Appendix G. Data on richness of arthropods belonging to the guilds parasitoids, parasites, and omnivores collected during the experiments.

description: Data on richness of arthropods belonging to the guilds parasitoids, parasites, and omnivores collected during the experiments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556881.v1
title: Appendix G. Data on richness of arthropods belonging to the guilds parasitoids, parasites, and omnivores collected during the experiments.

description: Data on richness of arthropods belonging to the guilds parasitoids, parasites, and omnivores collected during the experiments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556878
title: Appendix H. Univariate analyses of covariance (ANCOVA).

description: Univariate analyses of covariance (ANCOVA).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556878.v1
title: Appendix H. Univariate analyses of covariance (ANCOVA).

description: Univariate analyses of covariance (ANCOVA).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556875
title: Appendix I. Sample-based and individual-based rarefaction curves.

description: Sample-based and individual-based rarefaction curves.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556875.v1
title: Appendix I. Sample-based and individual-based rarefaction curves.

description: Sample-based and individual-based rarefaction curves.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556872
title: Appendix J. Analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) and similarity percentage (SIMPER) comparing species composition among treatments.

description: Analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) and similarity percentage (SIMPER) comparing species composition among treatments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556872.v1
title: Appendix J. Analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) and similarity percentage (SIMPER) comparing species composition among treatments.

description: Analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) and similarity percentage (SIMPER) comparing species composition among treatments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556869
title: Appendix K. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) with stable solution from random starts, axis scaling, and species scores.

description: Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) with stable solution from random starts, axis scaling, and species scores.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556869.v1
title: Appendix K. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) with stable solution from random starts, axis scaling, and species scores.

description: Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) with stable solution from random starts, axis scaling, and species scores.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556866
title: Appendix A. Species pool of the Jena Experiment with inclusion status in the analyses.

description: Species pool of the Jena Experiment with inclusion status in the analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556866.v1
title: Appendix A. Species pool of the Jena Experiment with inclusion status in the analyses.

description: Species pool of the Jena Experiment with inclusion status in the analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556863
title: Appendix B. Detailed list of the 42 traits initially considered to predict leaf standing herbivore damage and graph of predicted against measured values of herbivory in monocultures.

description: Detailed list of the 42 traits initially considered to predict leaf standing herbivore damage and graph of predicted against measured values of herbivory in monocultures.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556863.v1
title: Appendix B. Detailed list of the 42 traits initially considered to predict leaf standing herbivore damage and graph of predicted against measured values of herbivory in monocultures.

description: Detailed list of the 42 traits initially considered to predict leaf standing herbivore damage and graph of predicted against measured values of herbivory in monocultures.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556860
title: Appendix C. Description of the Random Forests (RF) analysis and graph of the results, explaining how traits were selected.

description: Description of the Random Forests (RF) analysis and graph of the results, explaining how traits were selected.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556860.v1
title: Appendix C. Description of the Random Forests (RF) analysis and graph of the results, explaining how traits were selected.

description: Description of the Random Forests (RF) analysis and graph of the results, explaining how traits were selected.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556854
title: Appendix E. Log-response ratios for nonadditive and additive effects based on the different models.

description: Log-response ratios for nonadditive and additive effects based on the different models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556854.v1
title: Appendix E. Log-response ratios for nonadditive and additive effects based on the different models.

description: Log-response ratios for nonadditive and additive effects based on the different models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556851
title: Appendix A. Description of the fully size-structured model and parameter domains of ontogenetic asymmetry and ontogenetic symmetry.

description: Description of the fully size-structured model and parameter domains of ontogenetic asymmetry and ontogenetic symmetry.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556851.v1
title: Appendix A. Description of the fully size-structured model and parameter domains of ontogenetic asymmetry and ontogenetic symmetry.

description: Description of the fully size-structured model and parameter domains of ontogenetic asymmetry and ontogenetic symmetry.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556848
title: Appendix A. Strengths of intra- and interspecific competition (C) and competition coefficients (A) for all four response variables (mass, length, developmental stage, and survival).

description: Strengths of intra- and interspecific competition (C) and competition coefficients (A) for all four response variables (mass, length, developmental stage, and survival).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556845
title: Supplement 1. Competition experiment data set and R code for model 1 (individual level), model 2 (basin level), and model 3 (basin level accounting for heteroscedasticity).

description: File List Competition_Model_Code.txt (MD5: 70506b9d3752928cbc45b020488d6c33) Tadpole_Competition_Data.txt (MD5: 1dfe519a33a7f7bfd54ba2ae682e4a66) Description Tadpole_Competition_Data.txt: This is tab-delimited data from tadpole competition experiments. Column descriptions below: Block = categorical A, B, C, or D corresponding to temporal block (date) Start = Start date of experiment End = End date of experiment Species = categorical F, M, or P corresponding to one of the three species of the focal individual Basin = categorical basin code corresponding to one of the 36 basins used in experiment Trt = categorical F, M, P, or C corresponding to competition treatment (C = low density / 60 individuals of focal species) Examples: Species = F, Trt = F → high density F treatment Species = F, Trt = P → F individual in P treatment Stage = response variable Gosner developmental stage (ranging from 25 to 46 or NA if the individual did not survive) Mass = response variable final weight (g) (NA if individual did not survive) Length = Body length (mm) (NA if individual did not survive) Survival = 1 if individual survived; 0 if individual did not survive until the end of the experiment. Competition_Model_Code.txt: This file contains R code to perform the following: Analyze the tadpole competition data with the three models described in the main text of the manuscript
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556845.v1
title: Supplement 1. Competition experiment data set and R code for model 1 (individual level), model 2 (basin level), and model 3 (basin level accounting for heteroscedasticity).

description: File List Competition_Model_Code.txt (MD5: 70506b9d3752928cbc45b020488d6c33) Tadpole_Competition_Data.txt (MD5: 1dfe519a33a7f7bfd54ba2ae682e4a66) Description Tadpole_Competition_Data.txt: This is tab-delimited data from tadpole competition experiments. Column descriptions below: Block = categorical A, B, C, or D corresponding to temporal block (date) Start = Start date of experiment End = End date of experiment Species = categorical F, M, or P corresponding to one of the three species of the focal individual Basin = categorical basin code corresponding to one of the 36 basins used in experiment Trt = categorical F, M, P, or C corresponding to competition treatment (C = low density / 60 individuals of focal species) Examples: Species = F, Trt = F → high density F treatment Species = F, Trt = P → F individual in P treatment Stage = response variable Gosner developmental stage (ranging from 25 to 46 or NA if the individual did not survive) Mass = response variable final weight (g) (NA if individual did not survive) Length = Body length (mm) (NA if individual did not survive) Survival = 1 if individual survived; 0 if individual did not survive until the end of the experiment. Competition_Model_Code.txt: This file contains R code to perform the following: Analyze the tadpole competition data with the three models described in the main text of the manuscript
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556842
title: Appendix A. Description of sample frame used in manatee pilot study.

description: Description of sample frame used in manatee pilot study.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556842.v1
title: Appendix A. Description of sample frame used in manatee pilot study.

description: Description of sample frame used in manatee pilot study.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556839
title: Appendix B. Parametric bootstrapping to estimate uncertainty of plot-level abundance.

description: Parametric bootstrapping to estimate uncertainty of plot-level abundance.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556836
title: Appendix C. Pearson residuals of models used in cross-validation.

description: Pearson residuals of models used in cross-validation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556836.v1
title: Appendix C. Pearson residuals of models used in cross-validation.

description: Pearson residuals of models used in cross-validation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556833
title: Appendix D. Plot of Pearson residuals for models used in cross-validation.

description: Plot of Pearson residuals for models used in cross-validation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556833.v1
title: Appendix D. Plot of Pearson residuals for models used in cross-validation.

description: Plot of Pearson residuals for models used in cross-validation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12910187
title: Table S1

description: Percentages of cell viability of tumor cells at different concentrations of polysaccharides.The effect of different concentrations of polysaccharides (µg/mL) were evaluated in a cytotoxicity assay. The viability cell was determined for each concentrations of polysaccharides on three tumor cell lines.<b></b><br>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12910211
title: Table S2

description: Increased Il-6 at different concentrations of polysaccharides.Different concentrations of polysaccharides were used for the production of IL-6 in activated RAW264.7.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12910256
title: Table S4

description: Percentages of cell viability of HGF-1 at different concentrations of polysaccharides.The toxicity of different concentrations of polysaccharides are shown in a non-tumor cell line corresponding to Human<i> </i><em>gingival fibroblast</em><i> </i>(<em>HGF</em><i>-</i><em>1</em>).<br>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12910238
title: Table S3

description: <b>Percentages of cell viability of RAW264.7 at different concentrations of polysaccharides. </b>Different concentrations of polysaccharides were used to determine cytotoxicity in RAW264.7.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556830
title: Supplement 1. R code for fitting the N-mixture model.

description: File List BetaBnCountsTruncPoissonAbund.R (MD5: 8dbe29e76e78687fcb479dce7b3e2424)Description BetaBnCountsTruncPoissonAbund.R contains R code for simulating point counts under the assumptions of the <i>N</i>-mixture model and for computing maximum-likelihood estimates of the model's parameters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12910187.v1
title: Table S1

description: Percentages of cell viability of tumor cells at different concentrations of polysaccharides.The effect of different concentrations of polysaccharides (µg/mL) were evaluated in a cytotoxicity assay. The viability cell was determined for each concentrations of polysaccharides on three tumor cell lines.<b></b><br>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12910238.v1
title: Table S3

description: <b>Percentages of cell viability of RAW264.7 at different concentrations of polysaccharides. </b>Different concentrations of polysaccharides were used to determine cytotoxicity in RAW264.7.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12910211.v1
title: Table S2

description: Increased Il-6 at different concentrations of polysaccharides.Different concentrations of polysaccharides were used for the production of IL-6 in activated RAW264.7.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12910256.v1
title: Table S4

description: Percentages of cell viability of HGF-1 at different concentrations of polysaccharides.The toxicity of different concentrations of polysaccharides are shown in a non-tumor cell line corresponding to Human<i> </i><em>gingival fibroblast</em><i> </i>(<em>HGF</em><i>-</i><em>1</em>).<br>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556827
title: Appendix A. Details of Bayesian analysis for bilateral photo-identification data.

description: Details of Bayesian analysis for bilateral photo-identification data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556827.v1
title: Appendix A. Details of Bayesian analysis for bilateral photo-identification data.

description: Details of Bayesian analysis for bilateral photo-identification data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556824
title: Appendix B. Simulation methods and results.

description: Simulation methods and results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556824.v1
title: Appendix B. Simulation methods and results.

description: Simulation methods and results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556821
title: Appendix C. Description of the bobcat data and integrated analysis.

description: Description of the bobcat data and integrated analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556821.v1
title: Appendix C. Description of the bobcat data and integrated analysis.

description: Description of the bobcat data and integrated analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556818
title: Appendix D. Extension for partially observed B encounters.

description: Extension for partially observed B encounters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556818.v1
title: Appendix D. Extension for partially observed B encounters.

description: Extension for partially observed B encounters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556815
title: Supplement 1. Example code for constructing A matrix and calculating basis vectors.

description: File List integrated_photoID_functions.r (MD5: 5b24a5e4b384548e2fe751a06e75b8c8) integrated_photoID_example.r (MD5: 49f5760b1a5bc9ffec4193f4fbc7d186) Description integrated_photoID_functions.r contains R code for functions that simulate bilateral encounter data, construct the <b><i>A</i></b> matrix, and calculate the necessary set of basis vectors for the LR, LRB, and LRAB data types. integrated_photoID_example.r demonstrates use of the functions included in integrated_photoID_functions.r.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556815.v1
title: Supplement 1. Example code for constructing A matrix and calculating basis vectors.

description: File List integrated_photoID_functions.r (MD5: 5b24a5e4b384548e2fe751a06e75b8c8) integrated_photoID_example.r (MD5: 49f5760b1a5bc9ffec4193f4fbc7d186) Description integrated_photoID_functions.r contains R code for functions that simulate bilateral encounter data, construct the <b><i>A</i></b> matrix, and calculate the necessary set of basis vectors for the LR, LRB, and LRAB data types. integrated_photoID_example.r demonstrates use of the functions included in integrated_photoID_functions.r.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556812
title: Appendix A. Simulation of landscape covariates as Gaussian random fields.

description: Simulation of landscape covariates as Gaussian random fields.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556812.v1
title: Appendix A. Simulation of landscape covariates as Gaussian random fields.

description: Simulation of landscape covariates as Gaussian random fields.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556809
title: Appendix B. Environmental covariates used in resource selection function (RSF) modeling for mule deer.

description: Environmental covariates used in resource selection function (RSF) modeling for mule deer.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556809.v1
title: Appendix B. Environmental covariates used in resource selection function (RSF) modeling for mule deer.

description: Environmental covariates used in resource selection function (RSF) modeling for mule deer.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3556806
title: Appendix C. Results of basic simulations and location-based availability simulations.

description: Results of basic simulations and location-based availability simulations.