cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/dxdzew
title: Petition of Edward Rawson

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Property &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:26855779"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:26855779&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1685 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Edward Rawson&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1685-05-07,1685-05-28 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Granted on May 7, 1685 and referred to next General Court and granted on May 28, 1685 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Granted, referred, granted &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Native American tribe: Nipmuc &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: confirmation of sale of land in Natick from Sagamore John Awassamaug, John Awassamoag, John Awassamug, Dedham, Medfield, Sherborn, debts, meadow, lands, Thomas Awassamaug, Thomas Awassamoag, Thomas Awassamug, John Saffin, Natick Indians, William Torrey, John Richards, Thomas Danforth, [additional documents in volumes, see pages 297-298a] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Massachusetts Archives volume 30, page 297 &lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/4uijzl
title: Kaiser Family Foundation
title: Kaiser Family Foundation

description: Users can utilize a number of interactive tools or access and download reports, fact sheets, slides, briefs and survey on various health topics.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt; Background &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation is a non-partisan non-profit research and communications organization focused on major health care issues in the U.S. and around the world. Topics are organized by the following categories: health reform; Medicaid/ CHIP; Medicare; costs/ insurance; uninsured/ coverage; state policy; prescription drugs; HIV/ AIDS; U.S. Global Health Policy; minority health; women's health policy; and media and health. &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt; User Functionality &lt;/b&gt;
&lt;/p&gt; Users can search for information by health topic category. After selecting the health topic category of interest, users can narrow their search by report type and date range. Reports types are: charts and data; fact sheets; interactive tools; issue briefs; news releases; presentations; reports and studies; surveys; testimony; and video/ audio. Users can also begin their search by initially focusing on a specific report type and then searching by health topic and data range. Additionally,
users can select "Fast Facts" from the Kaiser Family Foundation homepage to access a database of slides. Users can search for and download slides as PDF files or Powerpoint slides, or they can pick and choose specific slides and create a slideshow directly on the website. Information is available on an international/ global, U.S. national or U.S. state level.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;From the main website, users can move to other Kaiser Family Foundation sites that may be more tailored to their specific needs. On the StateHealthFacts.org website, individual state profiles and comparisons between or across all 50 states are available. The GlobalHealthFacts.org website allows users to compare different countries on an unlimited number of health indicators. &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt; Data Notes &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;All data comes from the Kaiser Family Foundation's own research efforts, and new studie
s and reports are frequently published.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/kwuza
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1847, Docket 1891, SC1/series 230, Petition of Jonas Parker

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Secession from the Union &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11029594"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11029594&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Reading &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Daniel Pratt, Reading; committee on the judiciary &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Jonas Parker&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Sarah Temple&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Rebekah Parker&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1847-03-18 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on March 18, 1847 and referred to the committee on the judiciary &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 29 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 15 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 12 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Other male signatures: 2 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: inhabitants, legal voters, non voters, [females], [other males], ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Signature numbers different from front of petition &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1847, Docket 1891 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/6jy9ji
title: Coding Rationalizations for Internment

description: Here, we detail our approach to identifying and classifying rationalizations/justifications for internment without trial, as evidenced in the archive record. All analyzed archive material are from The National Archives (UK, https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/).
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/fqvsto
title: EEOC v. Wal-Mart, Combs Report (defendant's expert)
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/crg9u
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1858, Senate laid on the table, SC1/series 230, Petition of W.A. McGillis

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Removal of Edward Greeley Loring &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11029811"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11029811&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;W.A. McGillis&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;George Radcliffe&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;William B. Eaton&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 9 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 9 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, legal voters &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Note next to signature &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1858, laid on the table &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/fobicr
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 81-2349
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/g5bmtw
title: Executive Agreements Database, Statement Regarding the Arrangement with Thailand For The Exchange Of Technical Information and Cooperation In Nuclear Safety Matters, with Addendums Signed At Rockville March 13, 2012 Entered Into Force March 13, 2012

description: TIAS 12-313 cover memo
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/vvcbhz
title: Replication data for: Political Parties and Representation of the Poor in the American States

description: Motivated by recent work suggesting that low-income citizens are virtually ignored in the American policymaking process, this paper asks whether a similar bias shapes the policy positions adopted by political parties much earlier in the policymaking process. While the normative hope is that parties serve as linkage institutions enhancing representation of those with fewer resources to organize, the resource-dependent campaign environment in which parties operate provides incentives to appeal to citizens with the greatest resources. Using newly-developed measures of state party positions, we examine whether low-income preferences get incorporated in parties’ campaign appeals at this early stage in the policymaking process—finding little evidence that they do. This differential responsiveness was most pronounced for Democratic parties in states with greater income inequality; it was least evident for Republicans’ social policy platforms. We discuss the implications of these findings for representation in this era of growing economic inequality.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/6jbg6
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1851, Docket 13162, SC1/series 231, Petition of Isaac R. Barbour

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Fugitive slave laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858310"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858310&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Massachusetts &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Isaac R. Barbour&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;James W. Stone&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;William Bates&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;George F. Williams&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Samuel E. Sewall&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;B.B. Mussey [Benjamin B. Mussey]&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;George W. Light&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Joseph Southwick&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Anson J. Stone&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;John Milton Earle&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Delano March&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Benjamin P. Rice&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 55 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 54 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Other male signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: inhabitants, legal voters, other persons, selectman, [other males] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Towns next to names including Worceseter, Boston, Stoneham, Montgomery, Dorchester, Somerville, Cambridge, Charlestown, Milford, Littleton, Paxton, Watertown, Princeton, Cummington, Montague, Foxborough, Heath, South Reading, Mansfield, Manchester, Brookfield, Chelsea, Sturbridge, Erving, Brookline &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1851, Docket 13162 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/kwja3g
title: Replication data for: Gene-Environment Interplay in Twin Models

description: Replication data for: Gene-Environment Interplay in Twin Models. Political Analysis This archive includes a table of contents file that describes each file, and the R code to generate the data for each part of the analysis.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/lqx9hx
title: GUINEE (2012): ETUDE MAP SUR LA DISPONIBILITE DES DESINFECTANTS DE L'EAU DE BOISSON EN GUINEE 2e passage.

description: Les etudes MAP permettent de faire un evaluation de la disponibilite des produits et leur accessibilite en fonction des criteres predefinis tels que la couverture, la qualite de la couverture, et l'acces. Les principaux objectifs de cette enquete etaient d'evaluer la couverture geographique et la qualite de la couverture de Sur'Eau en Guinee, determiner la densite des PDV des desinfectants de l'eau de boisson dans toutes les regions, et mesurer la distribution numerique de Sur'Eau et d'autres marques selon les types de PDV. Cette etude MAP utilise la technique de LQAS pour tirer un echantillon aleatoire de 19 zones de denombrement (ZD) dans chaque milieu de residence des cinq regions d'intervention de PSI/Guinee. Dans chaque region, tous les PDV potentiels dans le zone selectionne ont ete visites, et des informations sur les indicateurs ont ete recueillies.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/qsjnfj
title: Replication Data for: Impact of sensor placement in soil water estimation: A real-case study

description: Replication Data for: Impact of sensor placement in soil water estimation: A real-case study. Please refer to the Alternative URL for the updated publication information.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/fnr7di
title: Petition of Joseph Ephraim

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Property &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:26855911"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:26855911&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1743-03-21 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Natick &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Joseph Ephraim&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1743-04-07,1743-04-12 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received and read and granted in the House on April 7, 1743 and sent for concurrence and received and read and concurred in the Council on April 12, 1743 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, read, granted, sent, received, read, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Males of color signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: Indian, [males of color] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Native American tribe: Nipmuc &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: to sell lands, sale, debts, medical expenses, medical care, son, lameness, doctors, oxen, husbandry, families, Josiah Willard, William Shirley, Thomas Cushing, Isaac Coolidge, [additional documents in volumes, see v.31, pages 219-220, 247-248, 372-376, 440-441, 617-618 and v.32, pages 87, 401-402a, 479-480a, 614-615 and v.239, pages 584-585] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Massachusetts Archives volume 31, pages 440-441 &lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/4wgtoc
title: Preliminary Specimen fabrication tests and experimental setup with 12-bit Smart DAQ

description: Preliminary Specimen fabrication tests and experimental setup with 12-bit Smart DAQ.
See here:
https://github.com/aeonSolutions/aeonlabs-open-science-rammed_earth_project/wiki

and also here:
"Validation of Experimental Data Origins: A Swarm of DAQ devices able to Deliver Unique Experimental Data using Blockchain-like Fingerprint ID to a Data Repository"
https://github.com/aeonSolutions/openScience-Smart-DAQ-to-Upload-Live-Experimental-Data-to-a-Data-Repository
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/fltnbf
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1912, H 1407 committee on legal affairs - leave to withdraw, SC1/series 230, Petition of B.B. Alling [Benjamin B. Alling]

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Racial discrimination &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25763576"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25763576&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Boston &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: James A. Hart, Boston; committee on legal affairs &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;B.B. Alling [Benjamin B. Alling]&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1912-01-18,1912-01-29 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on January 18, 1912 and referred to the committee on legal affairs and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on January 29, 1912 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizen &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: no organization shall be formed or maintained which is calculated to advance the interest of any particular race or religious sect, includes address &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1912, H 1407 committee on legal affairs - leave to withdraw &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/fqu2j1
title: The Power of Business Models

description: Over the past few years, bbusiness modelsQ have surged into the management vocabulary. But, while it has become quite fashionable to discuss business models, there is still much confusion about what business models are and how they can be used. In fact, business models can serve a positive and powerful role in corporate management. While other authors have recently offered definitions of bbusiness model,Q none appear to be generally accepted. This lack of consensus may in part be attributed to interest in the concept from a wide range of disciplines, all of which have found a connection to the term. To help managers better understand business models, this paper reviews the extant literature and identifies and classifies the components of business models cited therein. Components were classified into four primary categories: strategic choices, the value network, creating value, and capturing value. To address the absence of a generally accepted definition of a business model, a new definition that integrates and synthesizes the earlier work is offered. Based on the proposed definition, business models are then contrasted with strategy. Four problems associated with business models are also discussed.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/pnpyoe
title: Beyond Borders: Enhancing Students’ Intercultural Maturity through Global Collaborations

description: This study examines a cross-cultural teaching collaboration between ‘University A’ in Cairo, Egypt and ‘University B’ in Philadelphia, USA, utilising a low-cost yet pedagogically innovative use of technology to internationalise the course experience. Students’ intercultural exposure is studied in light of the developmental model of intercultural maturity, evaluating cognitive (i.e., knowledge of cultural differences), intrapersonal (i.e., identity development, capacity to accept differences without being threatened by them), and interpersonal dimensions (i.e., sensitivity to others, capacity to relate to people from diverse backgrounds). Employing a pre/post design using the Global Perspective Inventory and qualitative reflections, the research examines University A students' intercultural maturity. The findings show a substantial increase in students’ interpersonal interactions, knowledge of multicultural issues, emotional awareness, acceptance of diverse perspectives, and social responsibility. This study has important pedagogical implications for higher education institutions wanting to enhance students’ capacity in cultural competence. Recommendations for optimising similar collaborations are provided.
description: The dataset was de-identified prior to posting it.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/fmbjr0
title: The Traditional Sheep Penning System: An Exploratory Study on Farmers’ Preferences, Farmer-Pastoralist Relationships and Economics of Sheep Penning in Telangana, India

description: Penning of livestock especially in the southern Indian peninsula can be traced back to the Neolithic age. The presence of ‘Ashmounds’ across most parts of the southern Indian peninsula indicates a complex agro-pastoral economy flourishing since the Neolithic era. Contemporary studies on sheep penning in India, however, remain mainly focused on its contribution to soil fertility and relevance to organic farming and economics, but very few studies have focussed on the farmers’ preference for sheep penning, farmer-pastoralist relationships and sheep penning economy in the backdrop of a rapidly changing agriculture landscape in the Telangana state of India. Observations of the study indicate that changes in agricultural practices and decrease in commons have led to changes in the sheep flock size, seasonal migration pattern of pastoralists and farmers’ preference for sheep penning in the study area. Participant farmers of the study, who practice both penning and application of synthetic fertilizer, reported to have incurred relatively lesser input costs than the farmers who exclusively rely on synthetic fertilizers. Penning was reported to be the second major source of household income for the pastoralists who participated in the study, next to the sale of live animals.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/g3m6tq
title: Identifying a group of factors predicting cognitive impairment among older adults

description: The datasets were used for the paper titled "Identifying a group of factors predicting cognitive impairment among older adults". All datasets were available from the NHANES website (https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/Default.aspx).
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/fmurqw
title: Authenticity

description: To explore the relationship between authenticity and meaning in life