cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15146720
title: Table 4. P in A new species of Mesopolobus (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae) from black locust crops

description: Table 4. P -distance values for sequences of M. robiniae Lakatos & László sp. nov. and all available species of Mesopolobus Westwood, 1833.
M. verditerM. bruchophagi12.66M. amaenus12.7112.46M. tortricis14.2213.0814.98M. dubius15.4113.5414.8917.66M. lichtensteini13.4713.6810.0615.9814.02M. sericeus14.7513.8714.4615.615.8114.45M. fuscipes13.2212.3913.8715.7513.8913.1611.82M. fasciiventris16.9814.7314.9615.5815.1515.114.6516.65M. tibialis15.4611.215.4616.8214.3915.7414.8114.2516.08M. xanthocerus15.5112.413.4417.2812.1814.7412.8911.5415.0812.11M. morys12.6810.4812.7614.1813.6613.1513.910.8914.6913.912.03M. robiniae sp. nov.12.513.5414.3914.6814.2115.0214.3915.8115.9416.5215.1715.85
description: Published as part of László, Zoltán, Lakatos, K. Tímea & Dénes, Avar-Lehel, 2021, A new species of Mesopolobus (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae) from black locust crops, pp. 127 in European Journal of Taxonomy 740 (1) on page 127, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2021.740.1285, http://zenodo.org/record/4643169
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15146719
title: Table 4. P in A new species of Mesopolobus (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae) from black locust crops

description: Table 4. P -distance values for sequences of M. robiniae Lakatos & László sp. nov. and all available species of Mesopolobus Westwood, 1833.
M. verditerM. bruchophagi12.66M. amaenus12.7112.46M. tortricis14.2213.0814.98M. dubius15.4113.5414.8917.66M. lichtensteini13.4713.6810.0615.9814.02M. sericeus14.7513.8714.4615.615.8114.45M. fuscipes13.2212.3913.8715.7513.8913.1611.82M. fasciiventris16.9814.7314.9615.5815.1515.114.6516.65M. tibialis15.4611.215.4616.8214.3915.7414.8114.2516.08M. xanthocerus15.5112.413.4417.2812.1814.7412.8911.5415.0812.11M. morys12.6810.4812.7614.1813.6613.1513.910.8914.6913.912.03M. robiniae sp. nov.12.513.5414.3914.6814.2115.0214.3915.8115.9416.5215.1715.85
description: Published as part of László, Zoltán, Lakatos, K. Tímea & Dénes, Avar-Lehel, 2021, A new species of Mesopolobus (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae) from black locust crops, pp. 127 in European Journal of Taxonomy 740 (1) on page 127, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2021.740.1285, http://zenodo.org/record/4643169
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15146731
title: Table 3 in Taxonomic implications of describing a new species of Loimia (Annelida, Terebellidae) with two size-dependent morphotypes

description: Table 3. Comparison of lateral lappets and number of teeth (including the main fang and the upper teeth) in thoracic and abdominal uncini of the species of Loimia Malmgren, 1866 considered as valid in the present study. Abbreviation: r = reduced.
SpeciesLateral lappetsThoracic unciniAbdominal unciniLocationOriginal descriptionL. annulifilisGrube (1872)L. arborea1 and 2/35(6)6(7)JapanMoore (1903)L. armataCarrerette & Nogueira (2015)L. banderaHutchings (1990)L. batilla1 and 2/367AustraliaHutchings & Glasby (1988)L. bermudensis1 and 35–6(6r)5–6(6r)BermudaVerrill (1900)L. borealisWang et al. (2020)L. brasiliensisCarrerette & Nogueira (2015)L. contortaEhlers (1908)L. crassifilisGrube (1878)L. davidi sp. nov. (larger)1 and 36(6r)6(6r)Açores ArchipelagoThis paperL. davidi sp. nov. (smaller)1 and 345Açores ArchipelagoThis paperL. decora1 and 2/355Sri LankaPillai (1961)L. gigantea1 and 36(5)6(5)Atlantic (France)Montagu (1819), redescribed by Lavesque et al. (2017)L. grubei1 and 2/355–6PhilippinesHolthe (1986)L. ingensGrube (1878)L. juaniNogueira, Hutchings & Carrerette (2015)L. keableiNogueira et al. (2015)L. macrobranchiaWang et al. (2020)L. medusa1 and 34–54–5Persian Gulf / Red SeaSavigny (1822)L. medusa angustescutataWilley (1905)L. megaoculataCarrerette & Nogueira (2015)L. minuta1 and 356Caribbean (Mexico)Treadwell (1929)L. nigrifilisCaullery (1944)L. ochraceaGrube (1877)L. pseudotrilobaNogueira et al. (2015)L. salazari1 and 344Caribbean (Venezuela)Londoño-Mesa & Carrera-Parra (2005)L. savignyiMcIntosh (1885)L. savignyi trussanicaAnnenkova (1925)L. triloba1 (3 and 4)5(6)5(6)AustraliaHutchings & Glasby (1988)L. tuberculataNogueira et al. (2015)L. turgidaAndrews (1891)L. variegataGrube (1869)L. verrucosa1 and 377IndonesiaCaullery (1944)L. viridis1 and 37–87–8Massachusetts (USA)Moore (1903)
description: Published as part of Martin, Daniel, Capa, María, Martínez, Alejandro & Costa, Ana Cristina, 2022, Taxonomic implications of describing a new species of Loimia (Annelida, Terebellidae) with two size-dependent morphotypes, pp. 77 in European Journal of Taxonomy 833 on page 77, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.833.1887, http://zenodo.org/record/6949902
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15146730
title: Table 3 in Taxonomic implications of describing a new species of Loimia (Annelida, Terebellidae) with two size-dependent morphotypes

description: Table 3. Comparison of lateral lappets and number of teeth (including the main fang and the upper teeth) in thoracic and abdominal uncini of the species of Loimia Malmgren, 1866 considered as valid in the present study. Abbreviation: r = reduced.
SpeciesLateral lappetsThoracic unciniAbdominal unciniLocationOriginal descriptionL. annulifilisGrube (1872)L. arborea1 and 2/35(6)6(7)JapanMoore (1903)L. armataCarrerette & Nogueira (2015)L. banderaHutchings (1990)L. batilla1 and 2/367AustraliaHutchings & Glasby (1988)L. bermudensis1 and 35–6(6r)5–6(6r)BermudaVerrill (1900)L. borealisWang et al. (2020)L. brasiliensisCarrerette & Nogueira (2015)L. contortaEhlers (1908)L. crassifilisGrube (1878)L. davidi sp. nov. (larger)1 and 36(6r)6(6r)Açores ArchipelagoThis paperL. davidi sp. nov. (smaller)1 and 345Açores ArchipelagoThis paperL. decora1 and 2/355Sri LankaPillai (1961)L. gigantea1 and 36(5)6(5)Atlantic (France)Montagu (1819), redescribed by Lavesque et al. (2017)L. grubei1 and 2/355–6PhilippinesHolthe (1986)L. ingensGrube (1878)L. juaniNogueira, Hutchings & Carrerette (2015)L. keableiNogueira et al. (2015)L. macrobranchiaWang et al. (2020)L. medusa1 and 34–54–5Persian Gulf / Red SeaSavigny (1822)L. medusa angustescutataWilley (1905)L. megaoculataCarrerette & Nogueira (2015)L. minuta1 and 356Caribbean (Mexico)Treadwell (1929)L. nigrifilisCaullery (1944)L. ochraceaGrube (1877)L. pseudotrilobaNogueira et al. (2015)L. salazari1 and 344Caribbean (Venezuela)Londoño-Mesa & Carrera-Parra (2005)L. savignyiMcIntosh (1885)L. savignyi trussanicaAnnenkova (1925)L. triloba1 (3 and 4)5(6)5(6)AustraliaHutchings & Glasby (1988)L. tuberculataNogueira et al. (2015)L. turgidaAndrews (1891)L. variegataGrube (1869)L. verrucosa1 and 377IndonesiaCaullery (1944)L. viridis1 and 37–87–8Massachusetts (USA)Moore (1903)
description: Published as part of Martin, Daniel, Capa, María, Martínez, Alejandro & Costa, Ana Cristina, 2022, Taxonomic implications of describing a new species of Loimia (Annelida, Terebellidae) with two size-dependent morphotypes, pp. 77 in European Journal of Taxonomy 833 on page 77, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.833.1887, http://zenodo.org/record/6949902
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15146732
title: Table 4 in Taxonomic implications of describing a new species of Loimia (Annelida, Terebellidae) with two size-dependent morphotypes

description: Table 4. Estimates of evolutionary divergence over sequence pairs between groups (species), showing the number of base substitutions per site from averaging over all sequence pairs between groups. Analyses were conducted using p-distance in the upper-right corner, and the Tamura-Nei model with a rate of variation among sites modelled with a gamma distribution (shape parameter = 4) in the lower-left corner. Grey = average distance within groups. Abbreviation: na = not applicable.
L. giganteaL. medusa 1L. medusa 2 L. davidi sp nov. (larger)L. davidi sp nov. (smaller)Loimia sp. 1L. borealisLoimia sp. 2L. ingensL. arbórea 1L. banderaL. arborea 2Loimia gigantea0.0020.1900.192 0.2000.1970.1880.1830.1680.2050.1940.1910.230L. medusa 10.230na0.184 0.2010.2040.1840.2040.1910.1760.2020.1910.224L. medusa 20.2390.223na 0.1840.1970.1940.1940.1980.1840.1860.1940.261L. davidi sp. nov. (larger)0.2480.2540.226 na0.0210.1920.2040.2310.2090.1860.1760.259L.. davidi sp. nov. (smaller)0.2430.2580.244 0.0220.0110.2100.2020.2430.2220.1980.1960.263Loimia sp. 10.2300.2240.241 0.2380.2660.0030.1680.1870.1510.1990.1890.222L. borealis0.2240.2550.236 0.2580.2540.2010.0000.1850.1980.1780.1940.225Loimia sp. 20.2040.2360.246 0.3080.3270.2320.2300.0050.1640.1820.1810.227L. ingens0.2580.2110.222 0.2700.2880.1780.2480.1960.0030.2110.1680.241L. arborea 10.2390.2490.225 0.2280.2450.2490.2170.2220.26800.1520.253L. bandera0.2350.2360.238 0.2130.2430.2340.2410.2210.1990.18300.214L. arborea 20.2980.2820.354 0.3510.3610.2820.2910.2920.3120.3360.269na
description: Published as part of Martin, Daniel, Capa, María, Martínez, Alejandro & Costa, Ana Cristina, 2022, Taxonomic implications of describing a new species of Loimia (Annelida, Terebellidae) with two size-dependent morphotypes, pp. 81 in European Journal of Taxonomy 833 on page 81, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.833.1887, http://zenodo.org/record/6949902
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15146733
title: Table 4 in Taxonomic implications of describing a new species of Loimia (Annelida, Terebellidae) with two size-dependent morphotypes

description: Table 4. Estimates of evolutionary divergence over sequence pairs between groups (species), showing the number of base substitutions per site from averaging over all sequence pairs between groups. Analyses were conducted using p-distance in the upper-right corner, and the Tamura-Nei model with a rate of variation among sites modelled with a gamma distribution (shape parameter = 4) in the lower-left corner. Grey = average distance within groups. Abbreviation: na = not applicable.
L. giganteaL. medusa 1L. medusa 2 L. davidi sp nov. (larger)L. davidi sp nov. (smaller)Loimia sp. 1L. borealisLoimia sp. 2L. ingensL. arbórea 1L. banderaL. arborea 2Loimia gigantea0.0020.1900.192 0.2000.1970.1880.1830.1680.2050.1940.1910.230L. medusa 10.230na0.184 0.2010.2040.1840.2040.1910.1760.2020.1910.224L. medusa 20.2390.223na 0.1840.1970.1940.1940.1980.1840.1860.1940.261L. davidi sp. nov. (larger)0.2480.2540.226 na0.0210.1920.2040.2310.2090.1860.1760.259L.. davidi sp. nov. (smaller)0.2430.2580.244 0.0220.0110.2100.2020.2430.2220.1980.1960.263Loimia sp. 10.2300.2240.241 0.2380.2660.0030.1680.1870.1510.1990.1890.222L. borealis0.2240.2550.236 0.2580.2540.2010.0000.1850.1980.1780.1940.225Loimia sp. 20.2040.2360.246 0.3080.3270.2320.2300.0050.1640.1820.1810.227L. ingens0.2580.2110.222 0.2700.2880.1780.2480.1960.0030.2110.1680.241L. arborea 10.2390.2490.225 0.2280.2450.2490.2170.2220.26800.1520.253L. bandera0.2350.2360.238 0.2130.2430.2340.2410.2210.1990.18300.214L. arborea 20.2980.2820.354 0.3510.3610.2820.2910.2920.3120.3360.269na
description: Published as part of Martin, Daniel, Capa, María, Martínez, Alejandro & Costa, Ana Cristina, 2022, Taxonomic implications of describing a new species of Loimia (Annelida, Terebellidae) with two size-dependent morphotypes, pp. 81 in European Journal of Taxonomy 833 on page 81, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.833.1887, http://zenodo.org/record/6949902
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15146736
title: TABLE 1 in Rediscovery and systematics of Rhinophis fergusonianus Boulenger, 1896 (Serpentes: Uropeltidae) from India's Western Ghats

description: TABLE 1. Meristic and metric data for holotype (*) and only other known, six newly referred specimens of Rhinophis fergusonianus. Measures given in mm. SL4 = fourth supralabial; DSR1 = first dorsal scale row; hyphen (-) indicates shortest distance between two points. Data for holotype from Cyriac et al. (2020), except for number of small scales overlapped by anal shields. Paired scale counts given in left, right order. Data recorded by DJG (BMNH 1946.1.16.77, BNHS 3687 and BNHS 3688) and SN (other four specimens).
*BMNH 1946.1. 16.77BNHS 3687BNHS 3688BNHS 3689BNHS 3690BNHS 3755BNHS 3691SexFFFFFMFTotal length323236>160422472276436Tail length9.87.76.614.614.314.012.1Midbody width7.26.7-11.4136.68.8Midbody circumference2323ca. 1737392636Snout tip-posterior edge SL4 (head length)7.86.7-11.611.37.48.1Head width at posterior edge SL44.44.1-7.48.94.25.9Maximum rostral length3.31.4-3.94.22.73.9Rostral-frontal0.60.6-0.90.80.60.3Frontal length2.42.4-4.24.02.93.3Frontal width2.31.9-2.63.02.02.4Snout tip-eye4.33.9-5.96.23.54.6Ventral scale width at midbody2.72.31.84.44.53.23.9DSR1 scale width at midbody2.01.81.53.13.22.43.1Tail shield width at base6.75.44.76.86.54.16.8Tail shield height at base8.46.25.44.44.33.24.1Tail shield middorsal length8.56.15.212.312.47.711.2Tail shield midventral length1.71.30.72.93.21.72.6Ventral scales195186>156194192183197Subcaudal scales (number unpaired)5,5 (1)7,6 (1)6,6 (0)6,7 (0)6,7 (0)8,9 (4)5,5 (1)Small scales overlapped by anal shields2,22,22,22,32,22,22,2Supralabial scales4,44,4-4,44,44,44,4Infralabial scales3,33,3-3,33,33,33,3Scales surrounding terminal scute10121214131212
description: Published as part of Gower, David J., Narayanan, Surya, Deepak, V., Anvar, Muhammed & Das, Sandeep, 2023, Rediscovery and systematics of Rhinophis fergusonianus Boulenger, 1896 (Serpentes: Uropeltidae) from India's Western Ghats, pp. 77 in Zootaxa 5374 (1) on page 77, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5374.1.4, http://zenodo.org/record/10144986
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15146737
title: TABLE 1 in Rediscovery and systematics of Rhinophis fergusonianus Boulenger, 1896 (Serpentes: Uropeltidae) from India's Western Ghats

description: TABLE 1. Meristic and metric data for holotype (*) and only other known, six newly referred specimens of Rhinophis fergusonianus. Measures given in mm. SL4 = fourth supralabial; DSR1 = first dorsal scale row; hyphen (-) indicates shortest distance between two points. Data for holotype from Cyriac et al. (2020), except for number of small scales overlapped by anal shields. Paired scale counts given in left, right order. Data recorded by DJG (BMNH 1946.1.16.77, BNHS 3687 and BNHS 3688) and SN (other four specimens).
*BMNH 1946.1. 16.77BNHS 3687BNHS 3688BNHS 3689BNHS 3690BNHS 3755BNHS 3691SexFFFFFMFTotal length323236>160422472276436Tail length9.87.76.614.614.314.012.1Midbody width7.26.7-11.4136.68.8Midbody circumference2323ca. 1737392636Snout tip-posterior edge SL4 (head length)7.86.7-11.611.37.48.1Head width at posterior edge SL44.44.1-7.48.94.25.9Maximum rostral length3.31.4-3.94.22.73.9Rostral-frontal0.60.6-0.90.80.60.3Frontal length2.42.4-4.24.02.93.3Frontal width2.31.9-2.63.02.02.4Snout tip-eye4.33.9-5.96.23.54.6Ventral scale width at midbody2.72.31.84.44.53.23.9DSR1 scale width at midbody2.01.81.53.13.22.43.1Tail shield width at base6.75.44.76.86.54.16.8Tail shield height at base8.46.25.44.44.33.24.1Tail shield middorsal length8.56.15.212.312.47.711.2Tail shield midventral length1.71.30.72.93.21.72.6Ventral scales195186>156194192183197Subcaudal scales (number unpaired)5,5 (1)7,6 (1)6,6 (0)6,7 (0)6,7 (0)8,9 (4)5,5 (1)Small scales overlapped by anal shields2,22,22,22,32,22,22,2Supralabial scales4,44,4-4,44,44,44,4Infralabial scales3,33,3-3,33,33,33,3Scales surrounding terminal scute10121214131212
description: Published as part of Gower, David J., Narayanan, Surya, Deepak, V., Anvar, Muhammed & Das, Sandeep, 2023, Rediscovery and systematics of Rhinophis fergusonianus Boulenger, 1896 (Serpentes: Uropeltidae) from India's Western Ghats, pp. 77 in Zootaxa 5374 (1) on page 77, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5374.1.4, http://zenodo.org/record/10144986
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15146738
title: TABLE 2. Uncorrected p in Rediscovery and systematics of Rhinophis fergusonianus Boulenger, 1896 (Serpentes: Uropeltidae) from India's Western Ghats

description: TABLE 2. Uncorrected p-distances (%) for intra- and interspecific comparisons for Indian Rhinophis with 15 dorsal scale rows at or slightly behind midbody, for one nuclear (prlr) and three mitochondrial genes (12s, 16s, nd4). Values are means, with ranges in parentheses, and number of pairwise comparisons in square brackets. Distances are based on the alignment available at https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/gower _fergusonianus (https://doi.org/10.5519/95s2p6kx).
nd412s16sprlrWithin R. fergusonianus1.4 [1]0.6 [1]0.9 (0.4–1.2) [2]0.2 [1]Within R. melanoleucus0 [1]0 [1]0.2 [1]0 [1]Within R. sanguineus2.0 (0–2.9) [6]0.5 (0–0.8) [6]0.3 (0–0.6) [6]0 (0) [6]Within R. karinthandani2.4 (0–3.7) [3]1.3 (0–1.9) [3]0.7 (0–1.0) [3]0 (0) [3]R. melanoleucus — R. sanguineus11.8 (11.5–12.1) [8]5.4 (5.3–5.6) [8]2.5 (2.2–2.8) [8]1.3 (1.3) [8]R. melanoleucus — R. karinthandani12.6 (12.5–12.8) [6]5.2 (5.1–5.3) [6]2.4 (2.2–2.6) [6]1.1 (1.1) [6]R. melanoleucus —R. sp.11.6 (11.6) [2]4.8 (4.8) [2]2.3 (2.2–2.4) [2]1.1 (1.1) [2]R. sanguineus —R. sp.2.8 (2.8) [4]1.1 (1.1–1.3) [4]0.2 (0–0.2) [4]0.2 (0.2) [4]R. sanguineus — R. karinthandani8.8 (8.2–9.6) [12]4.2 (3.5–4.5) [12]1.9 (1.8–2.2) [12]1.4 (1.4) [12]R. karinthandani —R. sp.8.3 (7.7–8.6) [3]4.0 (3.5–4.3) [3]1.7 (1.5–1.8) [3]1.3 (1.3) [3]R. fergusonianus — R. melanoleucus13.2 (13.1–13.4) [4]4.5 (4.3–4.8) [4]13.2 (13.1–13.4) [6]1.4 (1.3–1.6) [4]R. fergusonianus — R. karinthandani10.2 (10.6–11.3) [6]5.3 (4.8–5.9) [6]10.2 (10.6–11.3) [9]1.6 (1.5–1.8) [6]R. fergusonianus — R. sanguineus12.2 (11.9–12.5) [8]5.6 (5.1–6.1) [8]12.2 (11.9–12.5) [12]1.2 (1.1–1.4) [8]R. fergusonianus —R. sp.10.9 (10.7–11.1) [2]5.5 (5.1–5.9) [2]10.9 (10.7–11.1) [3]1.1 (1–1.3) [2]
description: Published as part of Gower, David J., Narayanan, Surya, Deepak, V., Anvar, Muhammed & Das, Sandeep, 2023, Rediscovery and systematics of Rhinophis fergusonianus Boulenger, 1896 (Serpentes: Uropeltidae) from India's Western Ghats, pp. 80 in Zootaxa 5374 (1) on page 80, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5374.1.4, http://zenodo.org/record/10144986
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15146739
title: TABLE 2. Uncorrected p in Rediscovery and systematics of Rhinophis fergusonianus Boulenger, 1896 (Serpentes: Uropeltidae) from India's Western Ghats

description: TABLE 2. Uncorrected p-distances (%) for intra- and interspecific comparisons for Indian Rhinophis with 15 dorsal scale rows at or slightly behind midbody, for one nuclear (prlr) and three mitochondrial genes (12s, 16s, nd4). Values are means, with ranges in parentheses, and number of pairwise comparisons in square brackets. Distances are based on the alignment available at https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/gower _fergusonianus (https://doi.org/10.5519/95s2p6kx).
nd412s16sprlrWithin R. fergusonianus1.4 [1]0.6 [1]0.9 (0.4–1.2) [2]0.2 [1]Within R. melanoleucus0 [1]0 [1]0.2 [1]0 [1]Within R. sanguineus2.0 (0–2.9) [6]0.5 (0–0.8) [6]0.3 (0–0.6) [6]0 (0) [6]Within R. karinthandani2.4 (0–3.7) [3]1.3 (0–1.9) [3]0.7 (0–1.0) [3]0 (0) [3]R. melanoleucus — R. sanguineus11.8 (11.5–12.1) [8]5.4 (5.3–5.6) [8]2.5 (2.2–2.8) [8]1.3 (1.3) [8]R. melanoleucus — R. karinthandani12.6 (12.5–12.8) [6]5.2 (5.1–5.3) [6]2.4 (2.2–2.6) [6]1.1 (1.1) [6]R. melanoleucus —R. sp.11.6 (11.6) [2]4.8 (4.8) [2]2.3 (2.2–2.4) [2]1.1 (1.1) [2]R. sanguineus —R. sp.2.8 (2.8) [4]1.1 (1.1–1.3) [4]0.2 (0–0.2) [4]0.2 (0.2) [4]R. sanguineus — R. karinthandani8.8 (8.2–9.6) [12]4.2 (3.5–4.5) [12]1.9 (1.8–2.2) [12]1.4 (1.4) [12]R. karinthandani —R. sp.8.3 (7.7–8.6) [3]4.0 (3.5–4.3) [3]1.7 (1.5–1.8) [3]1.3 (1.3) [3]R. fergusonianus — R. melanoleucus13.2 (13.1–13.4) [4]4.5 (4.3–4.8) [4]13.2 (13.1–13.4) [6]1.4 (1.3–1.6) [4]R. fergusonianus — R. karinthandani10.2 (10.6–11.3) [6]5.3 (4.8–5.9) [6]10.2 (10.6–11.3) [9]1.6 (1.5–1.8) [6]R. fergusonianus — R. sanguineus12.2 (11.9–12.5) [8]5.6 (5.1–6.1) [8]12.2 (11.9–12.5) [12]1.2 (1.1–1.4) [8]R. fergusonianus —R. sp.10.9 (10.7–11.1) [2]5.5 (5.1–5.9) [2]10.9 (10.7–11.1) [3]1.1 (1–1.3) [2]
description: Published as part of Gower, David J., Narayanan, Surya, Deepak, V., Anvar, Muhammed & Das, Sandeep, 2023, Rediscovery and systematics of Rhinophis fergusonianus Boulenger, 1896 (Serpentes: Uropeltidae) from India's Western Ghats, pp. 80 in Zootaxa 5374 (1) on page 80, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5374.1.4, http://zenodo.org/record/10144986
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15146748
title: TABLE 1 in Description of a new coastal Adota Casey (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae) species from Kamchatka

description: TABLE 1. Comparison of morphological characters among Adota kamchatkaensis Yoo and Ahn, sp. nov., A. ushio, and A. madida.
Adota kamchatkaensisAdota ushioAdota madidaBody length3.2–4.2 mm2.2–3.2 mmabout 2.0 mmFronswithout macrosetawith macrosetaewithout macrosetaAntennomere 4subquadrate (Fig. 2A)transverse (fig. 44 in Lee et al. 2013)transverseAntennomere 9subquadrate (Fig. 2A)slightly transversetransversePosterior margin tergite VIII of maleemarginate (Fig. 2B)emarginate and crenateemarginatePosterior margin sternite VIII of malewithout bifurcate setae (Fig. 2D)without bifurcate setaewith bifurcate setae (fig. 8G in Sawada 1977)Median lobe of aedeagusnarrower (Fig. 3F–H)broader (fig. 50–52 in Lee et al. 2013)broader (fig. 5H in 1977) SawadaSpermathecaduct longer and narrower (Fig. 3I)duct shorter (fig. 53 in Lee et al. 2013)duct longer and narrower (fig. 8L in Sawada 1977)
description: Published as part of Yoo, In-Seong, Jung, Jong-Keun & Ahn, Kee-Jeong, 2024, Description of a new coastal Adota Casey (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae) species from Kamchatka, pp. 599 in Zootaxa 5433 (4) on page 599, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5433.4.9, http://zenodo.org/record/10954721
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15146749
title: TABLE 1 in Description of a new coastal Adota Casey (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae) species from Kamchatka

description: TABLE 1. Comparison of morphological characters among Adota kamchatkaensis Yoo and Ahn, sp. nov., A. ushio, and A. madida.
Adota kamchatkaensisAdota ushioAdota madidaBody length3.2–4.2 mm2.2–3.2 mmabout 2.0 mmFronswithout macrosetawith macrosetaewithout macrosetaAntennomere 4subquadrate (Fig. 2A)transverse (fig. 44 in Lee et al. 2013)transverseAntennomere 9subquadrate (Fig. 2A)slightly transversetransversePosterior margin tergite VIII of maleemarginate (Fig. 2B)emarginate and crenateemarginatePosterior margin sternite VIII of malewithout bifurcate setae (Fig. 2D)without bifurcate setaewith bifurcate setae (fig. 8G in Sawada 1977)Median lobe of aedeagusnarrower (Fig. 3F–H)broader (fig. 50–52 in Lee et al. 2013)broader (fig. 5H in 1977) SawadaSpermathecaduct longer and narrower (Fig. 3I)duct shorter (fig. 53 in Lee et al. 2013)duct longer and narrower (fig. 8L in Sawada 1977)
description: Published as part of Yoo, In-Seong, Jung, Jong-Keun & Ahn, Kee-Jeong, 2024, Description of a new coastal Adota Casey (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae) species from Kamchatka, pp. 599 in Zootaxa 5433 (4) on page 599, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5433.4.9, http://zenodo.org/record/10954721