cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.15468/dl.b43u4g
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 386315 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "BasisOfRecord is one of (Human Observation, Specimen)",
 "CoordinateUncertaintyInMeters 0.0-10000.0",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 "TaxonKey is one of (Eragrostis rogersii, Eragrostis omahekensis, Aegilops tauschii, Digitaria debilis, Avena barbata, Sarga timorensis, Aegilops ventricosa, Echinochloa colonum, Eriochloa australiensis, Bromus pectinatus, Andropogon pseudapricus, Urochloa holosericea, Agrostis parviflora, Aegilops umbellulata, Bromus lanceolatus, Urochloa brachyura, Urochloa, Phaseolus acutifolius, Bromus madritensis, Aegilops comosa, Avena strigosa, Schizachyrium exile, Setaria grisebachii, Rostraria hispida, Eriochloa contracta, Eleusine coracana, Lathyrus belinensis, Aegilops kotschyi, Bouteloua aristidoides, Elionurus elegans, Setaria dielsii, Avena nuda, Aegilops speltoides, Festuca lachenalii, Eragrostis lateritica, Eragrostis hypnoides, Eragrostis perrieri, Aegilops sharonensis, Secale vavilovii, Aegilops triuncialis, Enneapogon desvauxii, Setaria sagittifolia, Urochloa xantholeuca, Agrostis pourretii, Avena fatua, Lathyrus aphaca, Festuca myuros, Chloris lobata, Briza humilis, Triticum monococcum)"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 386315 records from 2186 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0001629-260129131611470/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.p7yqwv
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 2 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "TaxonKey" : [
 "is BOLD:AAJ2127"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 2 records from 1 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0025538-250811113504898/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.hbpgmg
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 15 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "TaxonKey is Gossypium hirsutum",
 "Country is Honduras",
 "HasCoordinate is true"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 15 records from 4 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0025537-250811113504898/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.y9md3c
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 3 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "TaxonKey is Gossypium hirsutum",
 "Country is Iraq",
 "HasCoordinate is true"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 3 records from 2 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0025539-250811113504898/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.cg3jqg
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 36208 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "TaxonKey" : [
 "is Populus deltoides W.Bartram ex Marshall"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 36208 records from 554 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0021429-250525065834625/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/8qe22t
title: Replication data for: Limited Party Government and the Majority Party Revolution in the Nineteenth-Century House

description: Though we know much about majority party agenda control in the House of Representatives during the “modern” period from the 1890’s forward, far less is known about agenda control prior to that time. There are numerous reasons to suspect that the majority party lacked agenda control during most of the 1800’s. This suggests that we may have missed the greatest variation in majority party agenda control; it also leads to the main question of my dissertation: when and how did the majority party gain control over the legislative process?
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I argue that, unlike modern House majorities, nineteenth century House majorities did not control the agenda. By the 1880’s, massive increases in the House’s workload, as well as reduced ideological divisions within the majority party, led party members to revolutionize the legislative process in ways that allowed a bare majority to effectively decide which bills the House would pass. In so doing, they boldly stripped the minority party of many powers that it had enjoyed until tha
t time. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; To show this, I first map out the legislative process in the early 1800’s, showing that it differed radically from the modern process, and that it provided limited opportunities for agenda control. After showing that this process repeatedly produced outcomes that most majority party members disliked, I map out changes in the process that occurred across the nineteenth century. I then argue that an acute scarcity of floor time led majority party members to support strong ma
jority party agenda control by 1890. I offer evidence to support this claim, as well as evidence showing that, after 1890, legislative outputs changed in ways that reflect majority party agenda control.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; This has major implications regarding parties’ roles in the contemporary House. The changes of the 1880’s remain in place, and the majority party continues to wield the powers that it seized at that time. From this perspective, variation in majority party agenda control that has occurred since 1890 is minor compared to the revolutionary changes of the late 1800’s, and the majority has wielded a constant high level of agenda influence across the modern era.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
description: Subject: STANDARD DEPOSIT TERMS 1.0 Type: DATAPASS:TERMS:STANDARD:1.0 Notes: This study was deposited under the of the Data-PASS standard deposit terms. A copy of the usage agreement is included in the file section of this study.;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/trnaxt
title: Fighting Tuberculosis Through Community Based Counsellors in Northern Indian slums: A Randomized Evaluation of Performance Based Incentives

description: The title of the project was: "Fighting Tuberculosis Through Community Based Counsellors in Northern Indian slums: A Randomized Evaluation of Performance Based Incentives."
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/titscv
title: Questionnaires for the article: How 'Democratic' is the Democratic Peace? A Survey Experiment of Foreign Policy Preferences in Brazil and China, published in BPSR vol.14, n. 1, 2020

description: Questionnaires in Portuguese and in simplified and Traditional Chinese. 
Article: How 'Democratic' is the Democratic Peace? A Survey Experiment of Foreign Policy Preferences in Brazil and China
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821202000010002
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/zz05s
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1859, rejected, SC1/series 230, Petition of Calvin B. Cook

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Against the rendition of fugitive slaves &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11029962"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11029962&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Leominster &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Charles L. Joslin, Leominster; committee on federal relations &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Calvin B. Cook&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Robert Rogers&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Louisa S. Howland&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1859-01-14,1859-01-15 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on January 14, 1859 and referred to the committee on federal relations and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on January 15, 1859 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 410 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 302 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 60 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Other male signatures: 13 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Unidentified signatures: 35 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, legal voters, [females], [other males], ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1859, rejected &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.17632/mrfmwrbf38.1
title: Raw dataset of LRP1 manuscript 060125

description: All original western blots associated with the LRP1 manuscript.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/uw4x4t
title: Defined Mixtures Set 1

description: Defined mixtures of 2 to 5 contributors for 3K and 39K SNP Estonian profiles
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/mxrkua
title: American Community Survey
title: U.S. Census Bureau

description: Users can generate tables, charts and maps or download data sets to gather information on the characteristics of housing and population in communities. Data is available for towns, cities, metropolitan areas, counties, states, regions, divisions and for the entire nation.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Background&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt; The American Community Survey is developed and conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau. It is an ongoing survey, conducted annually, that provides information on population and housing. Communities can use information from the ACS to better understand how they are changing over time. Topics include, but are not limited to: aging, children, income, disability, education, mobility, relationships, social characteristics and housing values. &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;User Functionality &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt; Use
rs can access data in three ways. They can generate a variety of tables and maps from American Fact Finder portion of the website; they can gather historical and current data from the ACS File Transfer site; or they can download Public Use Microdata Sample files (samples of the actual responses on the ACS which provide information on population and housing characteristics).
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Data Notes &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt; The American Community Survey began in 1996 and is conducted in the United States and in Puerto Rico (The Puerto Rico Community Survey )annually. The most recent data has been released for 2009.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/uw6fap
title: Turbofan Specific Fuel Consumption, Size, and Mass from Correlated Engine Parameters
title: Links to all related documents:

description: Purpose – Simple equations and more extended models are developed to determine characteristic engine parameters: Specific fuel consumption (SFC), engine mass, and engine size characterized by engine length and diameter. SFC (c) is considered a linear function of speed: c = c_a * V + c_b. ---
Methodology – Data from 718 engines is collected from various open sources into an Excel spreadsheet. The characteristic engine parameters are plotted as function of bypass ratio (BPR), date of entry into service (EIS), take-off thrust, and typical cruise thrust. Engine length and diameter are plotted versus engine mass. Linear and nonlinear regression functions are investigated. Moreover, Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) is used to establish relations between parameters. SVD is used with Excel and MATLAB. The accuracy of all equations and models is compared. ---
Findings – SFC should be calculated as a linear function of speed. This is especially important, when SFC is extrapolated to unconventional (low) cruise speeds for jet engines. The two parameters c_a and c_b are best estimated from a logarithmic or power function of bypass ratio (BPR). SFC and c_b clearly improved over the years. Engine mass, diameter, and length are proportional to take-off thrust. Characteristic engine parameters can also be obtained from SVD with comparable accuracy. However, SVD is more complicated to set up than using a simple equation. ---
Practical implications – Engine characteristics need to be estimated based on only a few known parameters for aircraft preliminary sizing, conceptual design, and aircraft optimization as well as for practical quick calculations in flight mechanics. This thesis provides the tools. ---
Social implications – Most engine characteristics like SFC are considered company secrets. The availability of open access engine data is the first step, but wisdom is retrieved only with careful analysis of the data as done here. Openly available aircraft engineering knowledge helps to democratize the discussion about the ecological footprint of aviation. ---
Originality/value – Simple equation for jet engine SFC, mass, and size deduced from a large engine database are offered. This approach delivered equations as a function of BPR with an error of only 6%, which is the same accuracy as more complex equations from literature.
description: Excel, null
description: Digital Library - Projects and Theses - Prof. Dr. Scholz
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/6q0ujo
title: Replication Data for: Explaining Attitudes toward Immigration: The Role of Regional Context and Individual Predispositions

description: This archive contains replication data and commands for the article: Karreth, Johannes, Shane P. Singh, and Szymon M. Stojek. 2015. "Explaining Attitudes toward Immigration: The Role of Regional Context and Individual Predispositions." West European Politics 38 (6): 1174-1202.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/6qbgnf
title: SDR 2.0 Cotton File: Cumulative List of Variables in the Surveys of the SDR Database

description: SDR 2.0 Cotton File: Cumulative List of Variables in the Surveys of the SDR Database is a comprehensive data dictionary, in Microsoft Excel format. Its main purpose is to facilitate the overview of 88118 variables (i.e. variable names, values, and labels) available in the original (source) data files that we retrieved automatically for harmonization purposes in the SDR Project. Information in the Cotton File comes from 215 source data files that comprise ca. 3500 national surveys administered between 1966 and 2017 in 169 countries or territories, as part of 23 international survey projects.
&lt;p&gt;The COTTON FILE SDR2 is a product of the project &lt;b&gt;Survey Data Recycling: New Analytic Framework, Integrated Database, and Tools for Cross-national Social, Behavioral and Economic Research&lt;/b&gt;, financed by the US National Science Foundation (PTE Federal award 1738502). We thank the Ohio State University and the Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences, for organizational support.
DOI: 10.17632/2zv4snvn97
title: Fast charger location for hybrid electric bus transit networks

description: Data accompaining the article titled: Optimizing fast charger location for hybrid electric bus transit networks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2025.105175
DOI: 10.17632/2zv4snvn97.1
title: Fast charger location for hybrid electric bus transit networks

description: Data accompaining the article titled: Optimizing fast charger location for hybrid electric bus transit networks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2025.105175
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/s08fwg
title: The effects of team-based learning on nursing students’ learning performance with a focus on high-risk pregnancy: a quasi-experimental study

description: The attached files contain data on general characteristics, knowledge levels, and other main variables.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/toynmh
title: Replication Data for: The Ideologies of Organized Interests & Amicus Curiae Briefs: Large-Scale, Social Network Imputation of Ideal Points

description: Interest group ideology is theoretically and empirically critical in the study of American politics, yet our measurement of this key concept is lacking both in scope and time. By leveraging network science and ideal point estimation we provide a novel measure of ideology for amicus curiae briefs and organized interests with accompanying uncertainty estimates. Our Amicus Curiae Network (ACNet) scores cover more than 12,000 unique groups and more than 11,000 briefs across 95 years, providing the largest and longest measure of organized interest ideologies to date. Substantively, the scores reveal that: interests before the Court are ideologically polarized, despite variance in their coalition strategies; interests that donate to campaigns are more conservative and balanced than those that do not; and amicus curiae briefs were more common from liberal organizations until the 1980s, with ideological representation virtually balanced since then.
description: Volume #, Issue #
DOI: 10.15468/dl.6spe9v
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 204 records in GBIF matching the query:

 SELECT
 GBIF_MGRSCode(1000, decimalLatitude, decimalLongitude, 0.) AS mgrs_grid_cell,
 COUNT(DISTINCT speciesKey) AS unique_species_count
 FROM
 occurrence
 WHERE
 decimalLatitude &gt;= 46.128550 AND decimalLatitude &lt;= 46.228000
 AND decimalLongitude &gt;= 5.955881 AND decimalLongitude &lt;= 6.157913
 AND hasCoordinate = TRUE
 AND coordinateUncertaintyInMeters &lt;= 50000 -- Optional: filter for more precise coords
 AND countryCode IS NOT NULL -- Essential for most analyses
 GROUP BY
 mgrs_grid_cell


 The dataset's 204 records were derived from 187 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0017885-250525065834625/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/6rvz2p
title: Research Documentation for: Unreported Realities: The Political Economy of Media-Sourced Data
title: Ethics Approvals, Interview Guide, Copy of Supplementary Materials

description: Supporting research documentation for "Unreported Realities: The Political Economy of Media-Sourced Data" (American Political Science Review)
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/n2mc2q
title: Transcutaneous Stimulation Supplemental Files

description: Supplemental Files
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/hegheo
title: A13_25300.jpg

description: Link to OCHRE database: &lt;a href = 'http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/1c536244-4d1d-4b39-81ce-cad83d6a7498'&gt;http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/1c536244-4d1d-4b39-81ce-cad83d6a7498
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/trhnjx
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 82-1258
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/unjncq
title: Replication data for: Comparing Partial Likelihood and Robust Estimation Methods for the Cox Regression Model

description: The Cox proportional hazards model is ubiquitous in time-to-event studies of political processes. Plausible deviations from correct specification and operationalization caused by problems such as measurement error or omitted variables can produce substantial bias when the Cox model is estimated by conventional Partial Likelihood Maximization (PLM). One alternative is an iteratively-reweighted robust (IRR) estimator, which can reduce this bias. However, the utility of IRR is limited by the fact that there is currently no method for determining whether PLM or IRR is more appropriate for a particular sample of data. Here we develop and evaluate a novel test for selecting between the two estimators. Then we apply the test to political science data. We demonstrate that PLM and IRR can each be optimal, that our test is effective in choosing between them, and that substantive conclusions can depend on which one is used.
description: Volume 20, Issue 1
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/trm96
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1842, Docket 11057, SC1/series 231, Petition of Harriet Augustus

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: To define rights on railroads &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858183"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858183&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Boston &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Committee on the subject thereof &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Harriet Augustus&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Sarah E. Augustus&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;E. Singleton&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Catharine Sargent&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Henrietta Sargent&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Eliza F. Meriam&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Mary Goward&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1842-02-03,1842-02-04 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on February 3, 1842 and referred to the committee on the subject thereof and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on February 4, 1842 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 31 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 31 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: Yes &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: women, [females] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1842, Docket 11057 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/sylfwq
title: CCES 2014, Team Module of Duke University (DKU)

description: This dataverse contains the data and supporting documents for the CCES 2014 Duke University. This project was supported by the National Science Foundation, Grant Number SES-1430505.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/f6tsfg
title: Nordic Peoples Survey

description: The dataset presents responses to 'Nordic Peoples Survey', conducted in the northern regions of Norway and Sweden between April and September 2021. The survey is part of the interdisciplinary research project “'Ethnic Policies' – Remedy for Between-Group Inequalities?", consisting of political scientists and linguists from the Cluster of Excellence: Politics of Inequality, University of Konstanz, Germany. The project was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG – German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy – EXC-2035/1 – 390681379.

In addition, we provide the replication files for the article "Experience of Discrimination in Egalitarian Societies: The Sámi and Majority Populations in Sweden and Norway". For information on the dataset, please refer to the online appendix of this article (citation and link available under 'Related publications').

For any use of the 'Nordic Peoples Survey' dataset, please cite this article (see related publication for details), as well as the dataset itself.