cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13317387
title: National Checklists: Ecuador Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13317388
title: National Checklists 2019: Ecuador Species List

description: Lists of taxa for each country and a few other administrative zones harvested from effechecka using simplified versions of geonames polygons. See https://github.com/diatomsRcool/checklists for details.
A list of species from Ecuador collected using effechecka and geonames polygons
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14836792
title: National Checklists: Ecuador Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr36568.v1
title: Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, [United States], 2013-2014
title: Version 1

description: This collection contains information on federal criminal cases sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The data files include all cases received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had sentencing dates between October 1, 2012, and September 30, 2013, and were assessed as constitutional. Constitutionality compares each case's sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to provide uniformity in reporting the cases. In 1999, the United States Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases to this collection, so the data are now provided in two files. Several variables iterate to include multiple occurrences of the same event. Part 1, Main Data, includes all noniterating variables plus the highest occurrences of each iterating variable. Part 2, Supplementary Data, includes the remaining iterations.
description: Datasets: DS0: Study-Level Files DS1: Main Data DS2: Supplemental Data -- Variables SMIN1 to ADJC_PHI DS3: Supplemental Data -- Variables ADJC_Q1 to ADRL_QHI DS4: Supplemental Data -- Variables ADRL_R1 to STA3_240
description: All cases received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had sentencing dates between October 1, 2013, and September 30, 2014, and were assessed as constitutional. Smallest Geographic Unit: federal court district
description: Starting with the 1999 data, ICPSR archives MONITORING OF FEDERAL CRIMINAL SENTENCES under a new study number for each year of data. Data for the years 1993-1998 are archived in MONITORING OF FEDERAL CRIMINAL SENTENCES, 1987-1998 (ICPSR 9317).The data producer is the United States Sentencing Commission, Washington, DC.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr23323
title: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race, Summarized Yearly, 1981
title: Archival Version

description: These data provide information on the number of arrests reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program each year by police agencies in the United States. These arrest reports provide data on 43 offenses including violent crime, drug use, gambling, and larceny. The data received by ICPSR were structured as a hierarchical file containing, per reporting police agency: an agency header record, and 1 to 43 detail offense records containing the counts of arrests by age, sex, and race for a particular offense. ICPSR restructured the original data to logical record length format with the agency header record variables copied onto the detail records. Consequently, each record contains arrest counts for a particular agency-offense.
description: ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Created variable labels and/or value labels.; Performed recodes and/or calculated derived variables.; Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes..
description: Datasets: 
 
 DS1: Dataset
description: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data Series
description: computer-assisted self interview (CASI), on-site questionnaire
description: Arrests reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reporting program. Smallest Geographic Unit: states, counties, cities
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr23321
title: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race, Summarized Yearly, 1980
title: Archival Version

description: These data provide information on the number of arrests reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program each year by police agencies in the United States. These arrest reports provide data on 43 offenses including violent crime, drug use, gambling, and larceny. The data received by ICPSR were structured as a hierarchical file containing, per reporting police agency: an agency header record, and 1 to 43 detail offense records containing the counts of arrests by age, sex, and race for a particular offense. ICPSR restructured the original data to logical record length format with the agency header record variables copied onto the detail records. Consequently, each record contains arrest counts for a particular agency-offense.
description: Datasets: DS1: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race, Summarized Yearly, 1980
description: Arrests reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reporting program. Smallest Geographic Unit: states, counties, cities
description: computer-assisted self interview (CASI); on-site questionnaire
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr36367
title: Research on the Impact of Technology on Policing Strategy, 2012-2014 [United States]
title: Archival Version

description: These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they were received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except for the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompanying readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collection and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed.
The purpose of this study was to develop a research-based framework to guide police agencies in future selection, implementation, and use of technology. This project was conducted in three phases. First, an expert panel was convened to identify key policing technology and to ensure that the survey captured critical indicators of technology performance. Second, a nationally representative survey was administered to over 1,200 state and local law enforcement agencies. The survey explored policing strategies and activities as well as technology acquisition, use, and challenges.
description: The purpose of this study was to develop a research-based framework to guide police agencies in future selection, implementation, and use of technology.
description: This project was conducted in three phases. First, an expert panel was convened to identify key policing technology and to ensure that the survey captured critical indicators of technology performance. Second, a nationally representative survey was administered to over 1,200 state and local law enforcement agencies. The survey explored policing strategies and activities as well as technology acquisition, use, and challenges. Results from this survey were used to identify agencies that would be well suited for the final research phase, in-depth site visits. Site visit locations were stratified so that visits were conducted with both municipal and sheriff agencies of a variety of sizes (small, medium, and large) and experiences with technology.
description: Dataset 'Research on the Impact of Technology on Policing Strategy in the 21st Century.sav' contains 776 cases and 323 variables. These variables all pertain to the importance, acquisition, and impact of a variety of technology on policing practices.
description: Response Rates: 
					60.5%
description: Datasets: 
					
						DS1: Dataset
description: face-to-face interview
description: mixed mode
description: on-site questionnaire
description: All police departments in the United States in 2012.
				   		Smallest Geographic Unit: Region
description: The sampling frame was developed using the 2012 National Directory of Law Enforcement Administrators (NDLEA), an electronic list obtained from the National Public Safety Information Bureau (NPSIB). The 2012 NDLEA is composed of contact information for 15,847 law enforcement agencies in the United States.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13316402
title: National Checklists: Azerbaijan Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14836426
title: National Checklists: Azerbaijan Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14844019
title: Doppler lidar measurements from Villingen-Schwenningen, June 2023, Swabian MOSES 2023, Level 0 netCDF files

description: Original Doppler lidar measurements of the Doppler lidar system Lockheed Martin WindTracer WTX located at Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany (48.0563°N, 8.487°E) for the month of June 2023, sampled during the Swabian MOSES 2023 field campaign. A system signal failure occurred on 9th June 2023 and lasted until 15th June 2023.
description: Instrument: Lockheed Martin WindTracer WTX
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14844020
title: Doppler lidar measurements from Villingen-Schwenningen, June 2023, Swabian MOSES 2023, Level 0 netCDF files

description: Original Doppler lidar measurements of the Doppler lidar system Lockheed Martin WindTracer WTX located at Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany (48.0563°N, 8.487°E) for the month of June 2023, sampled during the Swabian MOSES 2023 field campaign. A system signal failure occurred on 9th June 2023 and lasted until 15th June 2023.
description: Instrument: Lockheed Martin WindTracer WTX
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr34286
title: Deaths in Custody Reporting Program: Local Jails, 2000 - 2013
title: Archival Version

description: The Deaths in Custody Reporting Program (DCRP) is an annual data collection conducted by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). The DCRP began in 2000 under the Death in Custody Reporting Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-297). It is the only national statistical collection that obtains detailed information about deaths in adult correctional facilities. The DCRP collects data on persons dying in state prisons, local jails and in the process of arrest. Each collection is a separate subcollection, but each is under the umbrella of the DCRP collection. This deals with the local jails subcollection, which has a local jail facilities death file. The jails portion of the Deaths in Custody Reporting Program began in 2000 after the passage of the Deaths in Custody Reporting Act of 2000 in October of 2000. The jails component of the DCRP collects data on inmate deaths occurring in local jail facilities while inmates are in the physical custody of jail facility officials.
description: Individual-level death data are collected from local jail facilities in the United States.
description: Datasets: DS1: Deaths in Custody Reporting Program: Local Jails, 2000 - 2013
description: Deaths of individuals incarcerated in local jail facilities. Smallest Geographic Unit: city
description: paper and pencil interview (PAPI)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13316451
title: National Checklists: Brunei Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14836563
title: National Checklists: Brunei Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr02679
title: Bethlehem [Pennsylvania] Police Family Group Conferencing Project, 1993-1997
title: Archival Version
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr09401
title: Community Policing in Baltimore, 1986-1987
title: Archival Version

description: This data collection was designed to investigate the effects of foot patrol and ombudsman policing on perceptions of the incidence of crime and community policing practices in Baltimore, Maryland. Data collected at Wave 1 measured perceptions of crime and community policing practices before the two new policing programs were introduced. Follow-up data for Wave 2 were collected approximately one year later and were designed to measure the effects of the new policing practices. Included in the data collection instrument were questions on the perceived incidence of various crimes, police effectiveness and presence, disorder, property and personal crime and the likelihood of crime in general, feelings of safety, crime avoidance behaviors and the use of crime prevention devices, cohesion and satisfaction with neighborhoods, and awareness of victimization and victimization history. The instrument also included demographic questions on employment, education, race, and income.
description: ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Standardized missing values.; Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes..
description: Datasets: 
 
 DS0: Study-Level Files 
 DS1: Wave 1 
 DS2: Wave 2
description: All residents of Baltimore, Maryland.
description: Multistage sampling based on neighborhood socioeconomics.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr36114
title: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: Arson, 2013
title: Archival Version

description: Since 1930, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has compiled the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) to serve as periodic nationwide assessments of reported crimes not available elsewhere in the criminal justice system. Seven main classifications of crime were chosen to gauge fluctuations in the overall volume and rate of crime. These seven classifications that eventually became known as the Crime Index included the violent crimes of murder and non-negligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault, and the property crimes of burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft. By congressional mandate, arson was added as the eighth Index offense in 1979. Arson is defined as any willful or malicious burning or attempt to burn, with or without intent to defraud, a dwelling house, public building, motor vehicle or aircraft, personal property of another, etc. The arson data files include monthly data on the number of arson offenses reported and the number of offenses cleared by arrest or other means. The counts include all reports of arson received from victims, officers who discovered infractions, or other sources.
description: ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes..
description: Datasets: 
 
 DS1: Dataset
description: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data Series
description: self-enumerated questionnaire 
Starting with the year 1998, each of the four parts of the UCR data collection archived by ICPSR is released as a separate study under its own study number. The Arson data for the years 1975-1997 can be found in UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROGRAM DATA [UNITED STATES]: 1975-1997 (ICPSR 9028).
description: Arson crimes reported by law enforcement agencies in the United States. Smallest Geographic Unit: states, counties, cities
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr37196
title: State Court Organization Trends, United States, 1980-2011
title: Archival Version

description: This data collection provides detailed comparative information about the structure, policies, and procedures of state-wide trial and appellate court systems for the 50 states and the District of Columbia within the United States for the years 1980, 1987, 1993, 1998, 2004, and 2011. Information gathered includes: the number of courts and judges, judicial selection, governance of court systems (including judicial funding, administration, staffing, and procedures), jury qualifications and verdict rules, and processing and sentencing procedures of criminal cases. Data collection was carried out by the National Center for State Courts.
description: Data for the 1980, 1987, 1993, 1998, 2004, and 2011 State Court Organization (SCO) reports were collected by the National Center for State Courts (NCSC) with funding provided by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). Data collections prior to 2011 were mail surveys to state court administrators in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The 2011 SCO collected information from this same set of state court administrators, but the 2011 collection was primarily web-based with paper surveys made available for respondents that preferred or needed a traditional response mode. A survey aimed at state court administrators was designed to collect information on court organization, administration, and operation. Separate surveys designed to collect descriptive information (e.g., budget and staffing) were sent to appellate courts and trial courts. While respondents provided most of the information to complete the survey, staff at NCSC also compiled information on specific laws, legal procedures, and legal practices that applied statewide.
description: This collection includes State Court Organization (SCO) data from 1980, 1987, 1993, 1998, 2004, and 2011 for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. It does not include information on Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories.
description: Datasets: DS1: State Court Organization Trends, United States, 1980-2011
description: Statewide appellate and trial courts in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Smallest Geographic Unit: State
description: mail questionnaire; web-based surveyFor related collections, please see: State Court Organization, 1998: [United States] (ICPSR 2854), State Court Organizations, 2004 [United States] (ICPSR 4575), and State Court Organization, United States, 2011 (ICPSR 37195)
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr04575
title: State Court Organizations, 2004 [United States]
title: Archival Version

description: This data collection provides detailed comparative information about the structure, policies, and procedures of state-wide trial and appellate court systems for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico in the United States as of June 31, 2004. Information gathered includes: the number of courts and judges, judicial selection, governance of court systems (including judicial funding, administration, staffing, and procedures), jury qualifications and verdict rules, and processing and sentencing procedures of criminal cases. Data collection was carried out by the National Center for State Courts.
description: Datasets: DS1: State Court Organizations, 2004 [United States]
description: Statewide appellate and trial courts in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Smallest Geographic Unit: state
description: self-enumerated questionnaires
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13316404
title: National Checklists: Bangladesh Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13316405
title: National Checklists 2019: Bangladesh Species List

description: Lists of taxa for each country and a few other administrative zones harvested from effechecka using simplified versions of geonames polygons. See https://github.com/diatomsRcool/checklists for details.
A list of species from Bangladesh collected using effechecka and geonames polygons
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14836433
title: National Checklists: Bangladesh Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr04631
title: Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2003
title: Archival Version

description: These data, collected to assist in the development of sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2003. The United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt, number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense, annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national security. Organizational defendants data, 2003, covers fiscal year October 1, 2002, through September 30, 2003.
description: ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Created variable labels and/or value labels.; Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes..
description: Datasets: 
 
 DS1: Dataset
description: Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts Series
description: Starting with the 1999 data, ICPSR archives ORGANIZATIONS CONVICTED IN FEDERAL CRIMINAL COURTS under a new study number for each year of data. Data for the years 1987-1998 are archived under study number 9513.
description: All organizational defendants sentenced in federal district courts during 2002-2003.