cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536260.v6
title: Data: study populations - location, wing length, monitoring method, tide

description: #--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br># Description of the dataset "study-populations_location_wing-length_monitoring-method_tide.csv"<br><br>#--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br># The dataset contains estimates of mean female and male wing length for study populations of biparental shorebirds (plus the locations of the study populations, whether the locations had tide, and whether the tide was used for foraging) from the Comparative study on shorebird biparental incubation<br># Questions can be directed to: Martin Bulla (bulla.mar@gmail.com)<br><br># Values are separated by comma.<br># Missing values are NA.<br><br><br> 1. scinam : scientific name of the species<br> 2. species : four letter abbreviatio of the species's English name<br> 3. study_site : name of the study site<br> 4. site_abbreviation : four letter abbreviation of the study site<br> 5. type : was the study site at the breeding ground (breeding) or not (wintering)<br> 6. lat : latitude of the study site (decimal)<br> 7. lon : longitude of the study site (decimal)<br> 8. tidal_habitat : is the study site at primarily tidal habitat (y=yes, n=no)<br> 9. tidal_used : if the study site is primarily tidal habitat, do the birds use it for foraging (y=yes, n=no)<br> 10. sexing_method : identifies the sexing method of the individuals used for the mean estimate<br> 11. mean_female_wing : mean female wing length for the population<br> 12. f_wing_N : sample size used for the mean estimate<br> 13. mean_male_wing : mean male wing length for the population<br> 14. m_wing_N : sample size used for the mean estimate<br> 15. data_source : is the mean estimate based on the primary data ("our primary data") or literature (citation)<br>#--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br>#WHEN USING THIS DATA, PLEASE CITE:<br><br>#Bulla et al (2016). Data: study populations - location, wing length, monitoring method, tide. figshare. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1536260. Retrieved ADD DATETIME.<br><br>#--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536193.v1
title: CUP30X

description: X value for neutron at CUP with 30cm Collimator
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536192
title: CUP10E

description: Energy for neutron at CUP with 10.2cm Collimator
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536195.v1
title: CUP30E

description: Energy for neutron at CUP with 30cm Collimator
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536260.v7
title: Data: study populations - location, wing length, monitoring method, tide

description: #--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br># Description of the dataset "Supplementary Data 2.csv"<br><br>#--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br># The dataset contains estimates of mean female and male wing length for study populations of biparental shorebirds (plus the locations of the study populations, whether the locations had tide, and whether the tide was used for foraging) from the Comparative study on shorebird biparental incubation<br># Questions can be directed to: Martin Bulla (bulla.mar@gmail.com)<br><br># Values are separated by comma.<br># Missing values are NA.<br><br><br> 1. scinam : scientific name of the species<br> 2. species : four letter abbreviation of the species's English name<br> 3. study_site : name of the study site<br> 4. site_abbreviation : four letter abbreviation of the study site<br> 5. type : was the study site at the breeding ground (breeding) or not (wintering)<br> 6. lat : latitude of the study site (decimal)<br> 7. lon : longitude of the study site (decimal)<br> 8. tidal_habitat : is the study site at primarily tidal habitat (y=yes, n=no)<br> 9. tidal_used : if the study site is primarily tidal habitat, do the birds use it for foraging (y=yes, n=no)<br> 10. incubation_monitoring: method used to monitor incubation (for details see Extended Data Table 4)<br> 11. sexing_method : identifies the sexing method of the individuals used for the mean estimate<br> 12. mean_female_wing : mean female wing length for the population<br> 13. f_wing_N : sample size used for the mean estimate<br> 14. mean_male_wing : mean male wing length for the population<br> 15. m_wing_N : sample size used for the mean estimate<br> 16. data_source : is the mean wing estimate based on the primary data ("our primary data") or literature (citation)<br>#--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br>#WHEN USING THIS DATA, PLEASE CITE:<br><br>#Bulla et al (2016). Data: study populations - location, wing length, monitoring method, tide. figshare. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1536260. Retrieved ADD DATETIME.<br><br>#--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br> <br><br>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536192.v1
title: CUP10E

description: Energy for neutron at CUP with 10.2cm Collimator
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536194.v1
title: CUP30Y

description: Y value for neutron at CUP with 30cm Collimator
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536190
title: CUP10X

description: X value for neutron at CUP with 10.2cm Collimator
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536190.v1
title: CUP10X

description: X value for neutron at CUP with 10.2cm Collimator
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536191
title: CUP10Y

description: Y value for neutron at CUP with 10.2cm Collimator
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536260.v8
title: Data: study populations - location, wing length, monitoring method, tide

description: #--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br># Description of the dataset "Supplementary Data 2.csv"<br><br>#--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br># The dataset contains estimates of mean female and male wing length for study populations of biparental shorebirds (plus the locations of the study populations, whether the locations had tide, and whether the tide was used for foraging) from the Comparative study on shorebird biparental incubation<br># Questions can be directed to: Martin Bulla (bulla.mar@gmail.com)<br><br># Values are separated by comma.<br># Missing values are NA.<br><br><br> 1. scinam : scientific name of the species<br> 2. species : four letter abbreviation of the species's English name<br> 3. study_site : name of the study site<br> 4. site_abbreviation : four letter abbreviation of the study site<br> 5. type : was the study site at the breeding ground (breeding) or not (wintering)<br> 6. lat : latitude of the study site (decimal)<br> 7. lon : longitude of the study site (decimal)<br> 8. tidal_habitat : is the study site at primarily tidal habitat (y=yes, n=no)<br> 9. tidal_used : if the study site is primarily tidal habitat, do the birds use it for foraging (y=yes, n=no)<br> 10. incubation_monitoring: method used to monitor incubation (for details see Extended Data Table 4)<br> 11. sexing_method : identifies the sexing method of the individuals used for the mean estimate<br> 12. mean_female_wing : mean female wing length for the population<br> 13. f_wing_N : sample size used for the mean estimate<br> 14. mean_male_wing : mean male wing length for the population<br> 15. m_wing_N : sample size used for the mean estimate<br> 16. data_source : is the mean wing estimate based on the primary data ("our primary data") or literature (citation)<br>#--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br>#WHEN USING THIS DATA, PLEASE CITE:<br><br>#Bulla et al (2016). Data: study populations - location, wing length, monitoring method, tide. figshare. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1536260. Retrieved ADD DATETIME.<br><br>#--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br> <br><br>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536188
title: CUP3E

description: Energy for neutrons at CUP with 3cm Collimator.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536191.v1
title: CUP10Y

description: Y value for neutron at CUP with 10.2cm Collimator
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536189
title: CUP3X

description: X value for neutron at CUP with 3cm Collimator
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536187
title: CUP3Y

description: Y value for neutrons at CUP with 3cm Collimator.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536188.v1
title: CUP3E

description: Energy for neutrons at CUP with 3cm Collimator.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536189.v1
title: CUP3X

description: X value for neutron at CUP with 3cm Collimator
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536260.v9
title: Data: study populations - location, wing length, monitoring method, tide

description: #--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br># Description of the dataset "Supplementary Data 2.csv"<br><br>#--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br># The dataset contains estimates of mean female and male wing length for study populations of biparental shorebirds (plus the locations of the study populations, whether the locations had tide, and whether the tide was used for foraging) from the Comparative study on shorebird biparental incubation<br># Questions can be directed to: Martin Bulla (bulla.mar@gmail.com)<br><br># Values are separated by comma.<br># Missing values are NA.<br><br><br> 1. scinam : scientific name of the species<br> 2. species : four letter abbreviation of the species's English name<br> 3. study_site : name of the study site<br> 4. site_abbreviation : four letter abbreviation of the study site<br> 5. type : was the study site at the breeding ground (breeding) or not (wintering)<br> 6. lat : latitude of the study site (decimal)<br> 7. lon : longitude of the study site (decimal)<br> 8. tidal_habitat : is the study site at primarily tidal habitat (y=yes, n=no)<br> 9. tidal_used : if the study site is primarily tidal habitat, do the birds use it for foraging (y=yes, n=no)<br> 10. incubation_monitoring: method used to monitor incubation (for details see Extended Data Table 4)<br> 11. sexing_method : identifies the sexing method of the individuals used for the mean estimate<br> 12. mean_female_wing : mean female wing length for the population<br> 13. f_wing_N : sample size used for the mean estimate<br> 14. mean_male_wing : mean male wing length for the population<br> 15. m_wing_N : sample size used for the mean estimate<br> 16. data_source : is the mean wing estimate based on the primary data ("our primary data") or literature (citation)<br>#--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br>#WHEN USING THIS DATA, PLEASE CITE:<br><br>#Bulla et al (2016). Data: study populations - location, wing length, monitoring method, tide. figshare. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1536260. Retrieved ADD DATETIME.<br><br>#--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br> <br><br>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536187.v1
title: CUP3Y

description: Y value for neutrons at CUP with 3cm Collimator.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536260.v10
title: Supplementary Data 3 - Study sites: location, population wing length, monitoring method, tide

description: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br> Description of the dataset "Supplementary Data 3 - Study sites.csv"<br><br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br> The dataset <br> - is used in the paper "Defying the 24-h day: Unexpected diversity in socially synchronized rhythms of shorebirds - Supplementary Actograms" by Bulla et al 2016<br> - contains estimates of mean female and male wing length for each population of biparental shorebirds from a specific study site, plus the locations of the study site, whether the locations had tide, and whether the tide was used by the population for foraging, and how the incubation was monitored.<br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br> Questions can be directed to: Martin Bulla (bulla.mar@gmail.com)<br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br> Values are separated by comma.<br> Missing values are NA.<br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br> 1. scinam : scientific name of the species<br> 2. sp : four letter abbreviation of the species's English name<br> 3. study_site : name of the study site<br> 4. site_abbreviation : four letter abbreviation of the study site<br> 5. type : was the study site at the breeding ground (breeding) or not (wintering)<br> 6. lat : latitude of the study site (decimal)<br> 7. lon : longitude of the study site (decimal)<br> 8. tidal_habitat : is the study site at primarily tidal habitat (y=yes, n=no)<br> 9. tidal_used : if the study site is at primarily tidal habitat, do the birds use it for foraging (y=yes, n=no)<br> 10. incubation_monitoring: method used to monitor incubation (for details see the paper's Extended Data Table 4)<br> 11. sexing_method : identifies the method used to sex individuals to estimate the mean female and male wing length<br> 12. pop_wing_f : mean female wing length for the population<br> 13. f_wing_N : sample size used for the female mean estimate<br> 14. pop_wing_m : : mean male wing length for the population<br> 15. m_wing_N : sample size used for the male mean estimate<br> 16. data_source : is the mean wing estimate based on the primary data ("our primary data") or literature (citation)<br><br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br>WHEN USING THIS DATA, PLEASE CITE:<br><br>Bulla et al (2016). Supplementary Data 3 - Study sites: location, population wing length, monitoring method, tide. <br> figshare. https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1536260.v11. Retrieved ADD DATETIME.<br><br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536116
title: Mixed method approach for determining the factors associated with late presentation in southern India

description: This data set includes the results of above mentioned study
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536116.v1
title: Mixed method approach for determining the factors associated with late presentation in southern India

description: This data set includes the results of above mentioned study
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1535533
title: Anvio v1.1.0

description: OS X installer for anvi'o v1.1.0
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1535530
title: Example of use of BiRO #3

description: Semantic enhancement of reference parts with EARMARK ranges.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1535533.v1
title: Anvio v1.1.0

description: OS X installer for anvi'o v1.1.0
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1536260.v12
title: Supplementary Data 3 - Study sites: location, population wing length, monitoring method, tide

description: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>Description of the dataset "Supplementary Data 3 - Study sites.csv"<br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br> The dataset <br> - is used in the paper "Defying the 24-h day: Unexpected diversity in socially synchronized rhythms of shorebirds - Supplementary Actograms" by Bulla et al 2016<br> - contains estimates of mean female and male wing length for each population of biparental shorebirds from a specific study site, plus the locations of the study site, whether the locations had tide, and whether the tide was used by the population for foraging, and how the incubation was monitored.<br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br> Questions can be directed to: Martin Bulla (bulla.mar@gmail.com)<br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br> Values are separated by comma. <br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br> 1. scinam : scientific name of the species<br> 2. sp : four letter abbreviation of the species's English name<br> 3. study_site : name of the study site<br> 4. site_abbreviation : four letter abbreviation of the study site<br> 5. type : was the study site at the breeding ground (breeding) or not (wintering)<br> 6. lat : latitude of the study site (decimal)<br> 7. lon : longitude of the study site (decimal)<br> 8. tidal_habitat : is the study site at primarily tidal habitat (y=yes, n=no)<br> 9. tidal_used : if the study site is at primarily tidal habitat, do the birds use it for foraging (y=yes, n=no)<br>10. incubation_monitoring : method used to monitor incubation (for details see the paper's Extended Data Table 4)<br>11. sexing_method : identifies the method used to sex individuals to estimate the mean female and male wing length<br>12. pop_wing_f : mean female wing length for the population<br>13. f_wing_N : sample size used for the female mean estimate<br>14. pop_wing_m : mean male wing length for the population<br>15. m_wing_N : sample size used for the male mean estimate<br>16. data_source : is the mean wing estimate based on the primary data ("our primary data") or literature (citation))<br><br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br>WHEN USING THIS DATA, PLEASE CITE:<br><br>Bulla et al (2016). Supplementary Data 3 - Study sites: location, population wing length, monitoring method, tide. <br> figshare. https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1536260. Retrieved ADD DATETIME.<br><br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1535359
title: The Explorer Islamabad Issue 8

description: The Explorer Islamabad August issue
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1535338
title: Multiscale modelling of epithelial tissue homeostasis and repair

description: Poster contribution for the CNRS - Jacques Monod Conference "Building, repairing and evolving biological tissues" held in Roscoff, France on September 13-17, 2015 (http://www.cnrs.fr/insb/cjm/2015/Vincent_e.html). This poster is based on joint work with Jochen Kursawe, Fergus Cooper and Ruth Baker at the University of Oxford and Jeremy Zartman, Cody Narciso and Pavel Brodskiy at the University of Notre Dame. Poster title: Multiscale modelling of epithelial tissue homeostasis and repair Poster abstract: The movement and organization of epithelial tissues plays a central role during development, growth, disease and wound healing. These processes occur as a result of cell adhesion, migration, division, differentiation and death, and involve multiple processes acting at the cellular and molecular level. Alongside experimental approaches, mathematical and computational modelling can help us understand what factors are involved in regulating cell- and tissue-level behaviour, and how this can go wrong. I describe our work to develop and apply multiscale modelling approaches to understand aspects of epithelial dynamics in several settings, including tissue size control in the Drosophila embryonic epidermis and tissue self-renewal and response to perturbation in the mammalian gut. I highlight the biological insights gained through this work, as well as ongoing challenges associated with such multiscale modelling approaches. Here are full details of the references listed in the poster: 1. J. Kursawe, P. Brodskiy, J. Zartman, R. Baker, A. Fletcher. Capabilities and limitations of tissue size control through passive mechanical forces. bioRxiv doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/023184 2. A. Fletcher, M. Osterfield, R. Baker and S. Shvartsman (2014). Vertex models of epithelial morphogenesis. Biophys. J. 106:2291-2304.<br>3. A. Fletcher, J. Osborne, P. Maini and D. Gavaghan (2013). Implementing vertex dynamics models of cell populations in biology within a consistent computational framework. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 113(2):299-326.<br>4. C. Narciso, P. Brodskiy, G. Garston, R. Baker, A. Fletcher, J. Zartman (2015). Patterning of wound-induced intercellular Ca2+ flashes in a developing epithelium. Phys. Biol. 12(5):056005.<br>5. G. Mirams, C. Arthurs, M. Bernabeu, R. Bordas, J. Cooper, A. Corrias, Y. Davit, S-J. Dunn, A. Fletcher, D. Harvey, M. Marsh, J. Osborne, P. Pathmanathan, J. Pitt-Francis, J. Southern, N. Zemzemi and D. Gavaghan (2013). Chaste: an open source C++ library for computational physiology and biology. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9:e1002970.<br>6. J. Osborne, M. Bernabeu, M. Bruna, B. Calderhead, J. Cooper, N. Dalchau, S.-J. Dunn, A. Fletcher, R. Freeman, D. Groen, B. Knapp, G.J. McInerny, G. Mirams, J. Pitt-Francis, B. Sengupta, D. Wright, C. Yates, D.JGavaghan, S. Emmott and C. Deane (2014). Ten simple rules for effective computational research. PLOS Comput. Biol. 10(3):e1003506.