cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519128
title: Appendix A. Ingesta fragments in the intestines of Spectacled Eiders in the northern Bering Sea.

description: Ingesta fragments in the intestines of Spectacled Eiders in the northern Bering Sea.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519128.v1
title: Appendix A. Ingesta fragments in the intestines of Spectacled Eiders in the northern Bering Sea.

description: Ingesta fragments in the intestines of Spectacled Eiders in the northern Bering Sea.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519125
title: Appendix B. Percentage of total mass of fatty acids in Spectacled Eider adipose tissue and potential invertebrate prey.

description: Percentage of total mass of fatty acids in Spectacled Eider adipose tissue and potential invertebrate prey.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519125.v1
title: Appendix B. Percentage of total mass of fatty acids in Spectacled Eider adipose tissue and potential invertebrate prey.

description: Percentage of total mass of fatty acids in Spectacled Eider adipose tissue and potential invertebrate prey.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519122
title: Appendix A. Mussel tissue δ15N data used in the study.

description: Mussel tissue δ15N data used in the study.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519122.v1
title: Appendix A. Mussel tissue δ15N data used in the study.

description: Mussel tissue δ15N data used in the study.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519119
title: Appendix B. A figure showing that water chemistry of the Oklahoma, USA, sites was not significantly related to the percentage of agriculture in the watershed, while the δ15N of mussels was significantly positively related.

description: A figure showing that water chemistry of the Oklahoma, USA, sites was not significantly related to the percentage of agriculture in the watershed, while the δ15N of mussels was significantly positively related.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519119.v1
title: Appendix B. A figure showing that water chemistry of the Oklahoma, USA, sites was not significantly related to the percentage of agriculture in the watershed, while the δ15N of mussels was significantly positively related.

description: A figure showing that water chemistry of the Oklahoma, USA, sites was not significantly related to the percentage of agriculture in the watershed, while the δ15N of mussels was significantly positively related.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519116
title: Appendix C. Relationship between net anthropogenic nitrogen inputs (NANI) and the percentage of N flux that is NANI.

description: Relationship between net anthropogenic nitrogen inputs (NANI) and the percentage of N flux that is NANI.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519116.v1
title: Appendix C. Relationship between net anthropogenic nitrogen inputs (NANI) and the percentage of N flux that is NANI.

description: Relationship between net anthropogenic nitrogen inputs (NANI) and the percentage of N flux that is NANI.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519113
title: Appendix A. Figure for the number of surveys per site and figures of additional predictive occupancy maps.

description: Figure for the number of surveys per site and figures of additional predictive occupancy maps.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519113.v1
title: Appendix A. Figure for the number of surveys per site and figures of additional predictive occupancy maps.

description: Figure for the number of surveys per site and figures of additional predictive occupancy maps.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519110
title: Appendix A. Model specification and Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm.

description: Model specification and Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519110.v1
title: Appendix A. Model specification and Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm.

description: Model specification and Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519107
title: Supplement 1. Program R code to fit a movement model to simulated data.

description: File List Run_Geremia_et_al_2013.R (MD5: 6473a85544c5ad4c1364156d539084fc) Simdata_Geremia_et_al_2013.R (MD5: 39d43c44eba8cbabcfc1901143a7289b) Markov_movementmodel_mcmc.R (MD5: ce270c6e117c0fa67c133744fb96ff66) Description This supplement provides code for simulating data and fitting those data to a hierarchical Bayesian state-space movement model. All files are provided as R code (R Code Development Team. 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org). The model coded within this supplement is a simplification of the model described in Appendix A. We assume that there are five wintering areas that are sequential and connected by one migration route each. The transition matrix <b>A</b> describes movements between these areas, where -- IMAGE: Please see in attached file. -- All animals are assumed to survive and we do not estimate a survival parameter in this example. The user can manipulate the number of movement covariates, parameter values, number of model updates within and between years, number of animals in the population, and number of GPS collared animals to explore the model. Users should begin by opening the file Run_Geremia_et_al_2013.R in Program R. Run_Geremia_et_al_2013.R internally sources the other files Simdata_Geremia_et_al_2013.R and Markov_movementmodel_mcmc.R. Within Run_Geremia_et_al_2013.R, users can manipulate variables and parameters. Users then run commands to simulate data given the specified variables and parameter values and recover those values using the model. Advanced users can adjust the files Simdata_Geremia_et_al_2013.R and Markov_movementmodel_mcmc.R for alternative spatial graphs that are appropriate for their data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519107.v1
title: Supplement 1. Program R code to fit a movement model to simulated data.

description: File List Run_Geremia_et_al_2013.R (MD5: 6473a85544c5ad4c1364156d539084fc) Simdata_Geremia_et_al_2013.R (MD5: 39d43c44eba8cbabcfc1901143a7289b) Markov_movementmodel_mcmc.R (MD5: ce270c6e117c0fa67c133744fb96ff66) Description This supplement provides code for simulating data and fitting those data to a hierarchical Bayesian state-space movement model. All files are provided as R code (R Code Development Team. 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org). The model coded within this supplement is a simplification of the model described in Appendix A. We assume that there are five wintering areas that are sequential and connected by one migration route each. The transition matrix <b>A</b> describes movements between these areas, where -- IMAGE: Please see in attached file. -- All animals are assumed to survive and we do not estimate a survival parameter in this example. The user can manipulate the number of movement covariates, parameter values, number of model updates within and between years, number of animals in the population, and number of GPS collared animals to explore the model. Users should begin by opening the file Run_Geremia_et_al_2013.R in Program R. Run_Geremia_et_al_2013.R internally sources the other files Simdata_Geremia_et_al_2013.R and Markov_movementmodel_mcmc.R. Within Run_Geremia_et_al_2013.R, users can manipulate variables and parameters. Users then run commands to simulate data given the specified variables and parameter values and recover those values using the model. Advanced users can adjust the files Simdata_Geremia_et_al_2013.R and Markov_movementmodel_mcmc.R for alternative spatial graphs that are appropriate for their data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519104
title: Appendix A. Developing an efficient sampling algorithm for bivariate profile likelihood.

description: Developing an efficient sampling algorithm for bivariate profile likelihood.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519104.v1
title: Appendix A. Developing an efficient sampling algorithm for bivariate profile likelihood.

description: Developing an efficient sampling algorithm for bivariate profile likelihood.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519101
title: Appendix A. Macrofaunal functional group classification.

description: Macrofaunal functional group classification.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519101.v1
title: Appendix A. Macrofaunal functional group classification.

description: Macrofaunal functional group classification.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519095
title: Appendix A. A table describing the 19 physical covariates.

description: A table describing the 19 physical covariates.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519095.v1
title: Appendix A. A table describing the 19 physical covariates.

description: A table describing the 19 physical covariates.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519092
title: Appendix B. Description of the method of obtaining an optimal value of w for the use in Eq. 1.

description: Description of the method of obtaining an optimal value of w for the use in Eq. 1.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519092.v1
title: Appendix B. Description of the method of obtaining an optimal value of w for the use in Eq. 1.

description: Description of the method of obtaining an optimal value of w for the use in Eq. 1.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519089
title: Appendix C. Plots of the cumulative importance for the environmental covariates that were not included in Fig. 3.

description: Plots of the cumulative importance for the environmental covariates that were not included in Fig. 3.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519089.v1
title: Appendix C. Plots of the cumulative importance for the environmental covariates that were not included in Fig. 3.

description: Plots of the cumulative importance for the environmental covariates that were not included in Fig. 3.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519086
title: Appendix D. A map containing comparisons of the predicted biodiversity among the three assemblages, using 13 boxplots for each of the bioregions within the study region.

description: A map containing comparisons of the predicted biodiversity among the three assemblages, using 13 boxplots for each of the bioregions within the study region.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519086.v1
title: Appendix D. A map containing comparisons of the predicted biodiversity among the three assemblages, using 13 boxplots for each of the bioregions within the study region.

description: A map containing comparisons of the predicted biodiversity among the three assemblages, using 13 boxplots for each of the bioregions within the study region.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519083
title: Appendix A. Mathematical description of persistence in spatially structured populations.

description: Mathematical description of persistence in spatially structured populations.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519080
title: Appendix B. Empirical example of how to calculate local retention without the full connectivity matrix.

description: Empirical example of how to calculate local retention without the full connectivity matrix.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519080.v1
title: Appendix B. Empirical example of how to calculate local retention without the full connectivity matrix.

description: Empirical example of how to calculate local retention without the full connectivity matrix.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519077
title: Appendix A. Temporal trends in abundance indices for 22 Puget Sound species and equations for trend-fitting.

description: Temporal trends in abundance indices for 22 Puget Sound species and equations for trend-fitting.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519077.v1
title: Appendix A. Temporal trends in abundance indices for 22 Puget Sound species and equations for trend-fitting.

description: Temporal trends in abundance indices for 22 Puget Sound species and equations for trend-fitting.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519074
title: Appendix A. Description of the study area, six related figures, and two tables containing all statistical results.

description: Description of the study area, six related figures, and two tables containing all statistical results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519074.v1
title: Appendix A. Description of the study area, six related figures, and two tables containing all statistical results.

description: Description of the study area, six related figures, and two tables containing all statistical results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519071
title: Appendix A. A perspective on a nonexistent gap in the state of the art.

description: A perspective on a nonexistent gap in the state of the art.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519071.v1
title: Appendix A. A perspective on a nonexistent gap in the state of the art.

description: A perspective on a nonexistent gap in the state of the art.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519068
title: Appendix A. Data availability, including a full list of species scientific names, taxa, and the number of data for each parameter and database, and a short list of the number of records for each of the parameters and database.

description: Data availability, including a full list of species scientific names, taxa, and the number of data for each parameter and database, and a short list of the number of records for each of the parameters and database.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519065
title: Appendix A. Ordination results for fine- and coarse-resolution environmental data at lynx–snowshoe hare encounters.

description: Ordination results for fine- and coarse-resolution environmental data at lynx–snowshoe hare encounters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519065.v1
title: Appendix A. Ordination results for fine- and coarse-resolution environmental data at lynx–snowshoe hare encounters.

description: Ordination results for fine- and coarse-resolution environmental data at lynx–snowshoe hare encounters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519062
title: Appendix B. Methods used to calculate step length.

description: Methods used to calculate step length.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519062.v1
title: Appendix B. Methods used to calculate step length.

description: Methods used to calculate step length.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519059
title: Appendix A. Bibliography of published ecological studies reviewed to produce Fig. 1.

description: Bibliography of published ecological studies reviewed to produce Fig. 1.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519059.v1
title: Appendix A. Bibliography of published ecological studies reviewed to produce Fig. 1.

description: Bibliography of published ecological studies reviewed to produce Fig. 1.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519056
title: Appendix A. List of bird species found in four agricultural landscapes in Central America, indicating whether the bird species is migratory or resident, and the habitats in which they were found.

description: List of bird species found in four agricultural landscapes in Central America, indicating whether the bird species is migratory or resident, and the habitats in which they were found.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519056.v1
title: Appendix A. List of bird species found in four agricultural landscapes in Central America, indicating whether the bird species is migratory or resident, and the habitats in which they were found.

description: List of bird species found in four agricultural landscapes in Central America, indicating whether the bird species is migratory or resident, and the habitats in which they were found.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519053
title: Appendix B. Mean species richness, abundance, Shannon diversity, and equity of birds observed in different tree cover types for four agricultural landscapes in Central America.

description: Mean species richness, abundance, Shannon diversity, and equity of birds observed in different tree cover types for four agricultural landscapes in Central America.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519053.v1
title: Appendix B. Mean species richness, abundance, Shannon diversity, and equity of birds observed in different tree cover types for four agricultural landscapes in Central America.

description: Mean species richness, abundance, Shannon diversity, and equity of birds observed in different tree cover types for four agricultural landscapes in Central America.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519050
title: Appendix A. Frequency distribution of flows for the environmental flow management strategies between 1986 and 2011.

description: Frequency distribution of flows for the environmental flow management strategies between 1986 and 2011.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519050.v1
title: Appendix A. Frequency distribution of flows for the environmental flow management strategies between 1986 and 2011.

description: Frequency distribution of flows for the environmental flow management strategies between 1986 and 2011.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519047
title: Appendix B. Calibrated parameters used in the Sacramento rainfall runoff model.

description: Calibrated parameters used in the Sacramento rainfall runoff model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519047.v1
title: Appendix B. Calibrated parameters used in the Sacramento rainfall runoff model.

description: Calibrated parameters used in the Sacramento rainfall runoff model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519044
title: Appendix C. Calibration and validation periods for modeling transmission losses and extractive demand for high-priority uses (human and animal consumption, industry, high-value agriculture) and low-priority uses (mainly irrigated agriculture).

description: Calibration and validation periods for modeling transmission losses and extractive demand for high-priority uses (human and animal consumption, industry, high-value agriculture) and low-priority uses (mainly irrigated agriculture).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519044.v1
title: Appendix C. Calibration and validation periods for modeling transmission losses and extractive demand for high-priority uses (human and animal consumption, industry, high-value agriculture) and low-priority uses (mainly irrigated agriculture).

description: Calibration and validation periods for modeling transmission losses and extractive demand for high-priority uses (human and animal consumption, industry, high-value agriculture) and low-priority uses (mainly irrigated agriculture).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519041
title: Appendix A. Tables and figures with landcover composition of the study area, a description of the environmental covariates used, information on the modeled waterbird species, tables with parameter estimates and model performance measures, and supplemental figures of estimated model predictions and bird distribution maps.

description: Tables and figures with landcover composition of the study area, a description of the environmental covariates used, information on the modeled waterbird species, tables with parameter estimates and model performance measures, and supplemental figures of estimated model predictions and bird distribution maps.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519041.v1
title: Appendix A. Tables and figures with landcover composition of the study area, a description of the environmental covariates used, information on the modeled waterbird species, tables with parameter estimates and model performance measures, and supplemental figures of estimated model predictions and bird distribution maps.

description: Tables and figures with landcover composition of the study area, a description of the environmental covariates used, information on the modeled waterbird species, tables with parameter estimates and model performance measures, and supplemental figures of estimated model predictions and bird distribution maps.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519038
title: Appendix A. Description of the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) details and posterior parameter distributions.

description: Description of the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) details and posterior parameter distributions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519038.v1
title: Appendix A. Description of the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) details and posterior parameter distributions.

description: Description of the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) details and posterior parameter distributions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519035
title: Appendix B. High brown fritillary spatial dynamics movie.

description: High brown fritillary spatial dynamics movie.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519035.v1
title: Appendix B. High brown fritillary spatial dynamics movie.

description: High brown fritillary spatial dynamics movie.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519032
title: Appendix A. Supplementary methods for estimation of classification model accuracy, community analysis, and field data comparison.

description: Supplementary methods for estimation of classification model accuracy, community analysis, and field data comparison.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519032.v1
title: Appendix A. Supplementary methods for estimation of classification model accuracy, community analysis, and field data comparison.

description: Supplementary methods for estimation of classification model accuracy, community analysis, and field data comparison.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519029
title: Appendix A. Tables showing interactions and correlations between covariates, and detailed boosted regression tree (BRT) model results.

description: Tables showing interactions and correlations between covariates, and detailed boosted regression tree (BRT) model results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519029.v1
title: Appendix A. Tables showing interactions and correlations between covariates, and detailed boosted regression tree (BRT) model results.

description: Tables showing interactions and correlations between covariates, and detailed boosted regression tree (BRT) model results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519026
title: Appendix A. Recruits per spawner in Bristol Bay systems (1958–2004).

description: Recruits per spawner in Bristol Bay systems (1958–2004).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519026.v1
title: Appendix A. Recruits per spawner in Bristol Bay systems (1958–2004).

description: Recruits per spawner in Bristol Bay systems (1958–2004).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519023
title: Appendix B. Transit time between fishing district and counting tower; run timing curves.

description: Transit time between fishing district and counting tower; run timing curves.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519023.v1
title: Appendix B. Transit time between fishing district and counting tower; run timing curves.

description: Transit time between fishing district and counting tower; run timing curves.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519020
title: Appendix C. Percentage of annual sockeye salmon harvest by set net and drift net (1958–2004).

description: Percentage of annual sockeye salmon harvest by set net and drift net (1958–2004).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519020.v1
title: Appendix C. Percentage of annual sockeye salmon harvest by set net and drift net (1958–2004).

description: Percentage of annual sockeye salmon harvest by set net and drift net (1958–2004).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519017
title: Appendix D. Comparison of observed effort and registered effort.

description: Comparison of observed effort and registered effort.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519017.v1
title: Appendix D. Comparison of observed effort and registered effort.

description: Comparison of observed effort and registered effort.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519014
title: Appendix E. Correlations: R/S and proportion of escapement exposed to exploitation (γ), relative intensity of the fishery (f), run size, and proportion of the run aged 3-ocean, and proportion of the run harvested (1958–2004).

description: Correlations: R/S and proportion of escapement exposed to exploitation (γ), relative intensity of the fishery (f), run size, and proportion of the run aged 3-ocean, and proportion of the run harvested (1958–2004).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519014.v1
title: Appendix E. Correlations: R/S and proportion of escapement exposed to exploitation (γ), relative intensity of the fishery (f), run size, and proportion of the run aged 3-ocean, and proportion of the run harvested (1958–2004).

description: Correlations: R/S and proportion of escapement exposed to exploitation (γ), relative intensity of the fishery (f), run size, and proportion of the run aged 3-ocean, and proportion of the run harvested (1958–2004).