DOI: 10.3886/icpsr39102
title: Sustainability Cultural Indicators Program (SCIP), Michigan, 2012-2015, 2018, 2021
title: Archival Version

description: The Sustainability Cultural Indicators Program (SCIP) is a groundbreaking effort designed to inform educational programs and campus operations at the University of Michigan. Two questionnaires (one for faculty and staff and another for students) have been administered to the U-M campus community on a regular basis since Fall 2012. The surveys yield responses from more than 3,500 students and 1,500 faculty and staff members each cycle. Questions cover carbon neutrality, travel and transportation, waste prevention and conservation, the natural environment, climate change, food, and engagement, awareness, and ratings of campus sustainability initiatives.
description: The purpose of this study was to measure and track the
culture of sustainability originally on the University of Michigan (U-M) Ann Arbor campus and to inform educational programs and campus operations at the University of Michigan. It was expanded in Fall 2021 to include the U-M Flint and U-M Dearborn campuses.
description: Two questionnaires (one for faculty and staff and another for students) were administered to the U-M campus community on a regular basis since Fall 2012. They were initially administered annually, then bi-annually. The surveys yield responses from more than 3,500 students and 1,500 faculty and staff members each cycle.
description: Questions cover carbon neutrality, travel and transportation, waste prevention and conservation, the natural environment, climate change, food, and engagement, awareness, and ratings of campus sustainability initiatives. The researchers removed the following information from the data in order to protect respondents' privacy:

Zip codes,
City/Township names,
Street names,
Resident Hall names,
Race/Ethnicity,
Identify as (male/female/non-binary), and
System fields used to manage the data
description: Sample weights were developed that should be applied when analyzing the survey data. Each dataset has weight variables. These weights should be used when reporting data covering all students and undergraduate students, and when reporting data for faculty and staff separately and together. Weights were computed using a raking approach, in which the marginal distribution of the sample with respect to a few respondents' characteristics is forced to match the corresponding population distribution. The following characteristics were used in the calculation of the weights: gender, ethnicity, undergraduate to graduate student ratio, undergraduate student's cohort, staff to faculty ratio, and employment within the U-M's Health System for the Ann Arbor faculty and staff population.
description: Response Rates: For the 2021 Data Collection Cycle the response rates were: Ann Arbor: 27.2%; Dearborn: 27.2%; Flint: 33.7%.
description: Presence of Common Scales: Various scales were used based on question type. See questionnaires and survey reports on the SCIP website for more information.
description: The SCIP survey was run annually, then bi-annually, administered to a cross-section sample of faculty, staff, and students with email addresses affiliated with the U - M's Ann Arbor campus. To be eligible to participate, faculty and staff had to be eligible to receive benefits (employed at least half-time), and students had to be enrolled for the current semester. In addition to the cross-section sample, there was a panel of undergraduate students who were enrolled in the survey then re-contacted every wave until they graduated.
description: Datasets: 
DS0: Study-Level Files
DS1: Faculty/Staff Cross Section Data - Ann Arbor 2012
DS2: Student Cross Section Data - Ann Arbor 2012
DS3: Student Panel Data - Ann Arbor 2013
DS4: Student Cross Section Data - Ann Arbor 2013
DS5: Faculty/Staff Cross Section Data - Ann Arbor 2013
DS6: Student Panel Data - Ann Arbor 2014
DS7: Student Cross Section Data - Ann Arbor 2014
DS8: Faculty/Staff Cross Section Data - Ann Arbor 2014
DS9: Student Cross Section Data - Ann Arbor 2015
DS10: Faculty/Staff Cross Section Data - Ann Arbor 2015
DS11: Student Panel Data - Ann Arbor 2015
DS12: Student Cross Section Data - Ann Arbor 2018
DS13: Faculty/Staff Cross Section Data - Ann Arbor 2018
DS14: Student Panel Data - Ann Arbor 2018
DS15: Faculty/Staff Cross Section Data - Ann Arbor 2021
DS16: Student Cross Section Data - Ann Arbor 2021
DS17: Faculty/Staff Cross Section Data - Dearborn 2021
DS18: Student Cross Section Data - Dearborn 2021
DS19: Faculty/Staff Cross Section Data - Flint 2021
DS20: Student Cross Section Data - Flint 2021
description: Students, faculty, and staff at the University of Michigan's Ann Arbor, Dearborn, and Flint campuses. Results for Flint and Dearborn are available from 2021 forward. Smallest Geographic Unit: College campus
description: web-based surveyFor additional information on the Sustainability Cultural Indicators Program, please visit the SCIP website. Outcomes from past surveys are available to the public on the study website.Records from the University of Michigan's (U-M) Office of the Registrar indicate that 50,059 full-time students were enrolled for classes at the Ann Arbor campus in fall 2021. At the same time, the U-M's Human Resources' Information and Data Services report that 5,800 faculty and 30,323 staff were full-time employees at the University. In order to ensure proportional representation from all segments of the University community and from all geographic parts of the Ann Arbor campus, the sample design aimed at obtaining relatively large numbers from the entire student body and from the population of staff and faculty. The student sample was drawn from lists in the Registrar's Office. Target numbers of respondents were determined by examining previous response numbers from earlier SCIP surveys. For students, the target numbers varied from 470 to 830 depending on class status. Similarly, a stratified sample was selected by the University's Office of Human Resources with a target of 750 staff and 900 faculty members. Similar efforts were made for Dearborn and Flint.