cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.23721/109/1506032
title: internet_address_history_it87w-20190911 (2016-10-03 to 2019-10-13)

description: This dataset, generated on 2019-10-28, contains all IPv4 addresses who ever responded to our ISI-west (w) censuses, starting from census it11w (internet_address_survey_it11w-20060307), e.g. it11w, it12w, ... Each IP address is given a history of replies (as a bit-string with 's representing ICMP_ECHO_REPLY received from this IP, and 's corresponding to no-replies. We also include numerical scores that are intended to reflect the likelihood that the given IP address will repond in the future. The scores are based on census data from it72w to it87w.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1517646
title: internet_address_census_it88j-20191127 (2019-11-27 to 2019-12-29)

description: To collect this data, an Internet-wide IP address sweep was conducted. Every IP address in the ranges allocated by IANA was pinged once by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. If the response (ICMP_ECHO_REPLY) came, its IP address was recorded in this data-set. In all, over 2.5 billion distinct IP addresses were probed during this experiment.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1518598
title: internet_outage_adaptive_a39n-20200101 (2020-01-01 to 2020-04-01)

description: To collect this data, all allocated and responsive Internet IP address blocks were pinged by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. The block status was recorded in this data set. Probe was repeated every 11 minutes, and more quickly when uncertain about block status. In all, approximately 3.5M /24 subnets were periodically probed.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1518599
title: internet_outage_adaptive_a39w-20200101 (2020-01-01 to 2020-04-01)

description: To collect this data, all allocated and responsive Internet IP address blocks were pinged by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. The block status was recorded in this data set. Probe was repeated every 11 minutes, and more quickly when uncertain about block status. In all, approximately 3.5M /24 subnets were periodically probed.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1519223
title: internet_outage_adaptive_a40all-20200401 (2020-04-01 to 2020-07-01)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1506027
title: internet_address_census_it87e-20190911 (2019-09-11 to 2019-10-13)

description: To collect this data, an Internet-wide IP address sweep was conducted. Every IP address in the ranges allocated by IANA was pinged once by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. If the response (ICMP_ECHO_REPLY) came, its IP address was recorded in this data-set. In all, over 2.5 billion distinct IP addresses were probed during this experiment.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1519224
title: internet_outage_adaptive_a40c-20200401 (2020-04-01 to 2020-07-01)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1519226
title: internet_outage_adaptive_a40g-20200401 (2020-04-01 to 2020-06-30)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1519227
title: internet_outage_adaptive_a40j-20200401 (2020-04-01 to 2020-07-01)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1519228
title: internet_outage_adaptive_a40n-20200401 (2020-04-01 to 2020-07-01)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1506028
title: internet_address_census_it87g-20190911 (2019-09-11 to 2019-10-13)

description: To collect this data, an Internet-wide IP address sweep was conducted. Every IP address in the ranges allocated by IANA was pinged once by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. If the response (ICMP_ECHO_REPLY) came, its IP address was recorded in this data-set. In all, over 2.5 billion distinct IP addresses were probed during this experiment.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1506029
title: internet_address_census_it87j-20190911 (2019-09-11 to 2019-10-13)

description: To collect this data, an Internet-wide IP address sweep was conducted. Every IP address in the ranges allocated by IANA was pinged once by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. If the response (ICMP_ECHO_REPLY) came, its IP address was recorded in this data-set. In all, over 2.5 billion distinct IP addresses were probed during this experiment.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1517644
title: internet_address_census_it88e-20191127 (2019-11-27 to 2019-12-29)

description: To collect this data, an Internet-wide IP address sweep was conducted. Every IP address in the ranges allocated by IANA was pinged once by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. If the response (ICMP_ECHO_REPLY) came, its IP address was recorded in this data-set. In all, over 2.5 billion distinct IP addresses were probed during this experiment.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1517645
title: internet_address_census_it88g-20191127 (2019-11-27 to 2019-12-29)

description: To collect this data, an Internet-wide IP address sweep was conducted. Every IP address in the ranges allocated by IANA was pinged once by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. If the response (ICMP_ECHO_REPLY) came, its IP address was recorded in this data-set. In all, over 2.5 billion distinct IP addresses were probed during this experiment.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1518560
title: internet_address_census_it89c-20200219 (2020-02-19 to 2020-03-24)

description: To collect this data, an Internet-wide IP address sweep was conducted. Every IP address in the ranges allocated by IANA was pinged once by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. If the response (ICMP_ECHO_REPLY) came, its IP address was recorded in this data-set. In all, over 2.5 billion distinct IP addresses were probed during this experiment.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1519011
title: internet_address_census_it90c-20200428 (2020-04-28 to 2020-05-30)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1517647
title: internet_address_census_it88n-20191127 (2019-11-27 to 2019-12-29)

description: To collect this data, an Internet-wide IP address sweep was conducted. Every IP address in the ranges allocated by IANA was pinged once by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. If the response (ICMP_ECHO_REPLY) came, its IP address was recorded in this data-set. In all, over 2.5 billion distinct IP addresses were probed during this experiment.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1518561
title: internet_address_census_it89e-20200219 (2020-02-19 to 2020-03-22)

description: To collect this data, an Internet-wide IP address sweep was conducted. Every IP address in the ranges allocated by IANA was pinged once by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. If the response (ICMP_ECHO_REPLY) came, its IP address was recorded in this data-set. In all, over 2.5 billion distinct IP addresses were probed during this experiment.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1519013
title: internet_address_census_it90j-20200428 (2020-04-28 to 2020-05-30)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1519014
title: internet_address_census_it90n-20200428 (2020-04-28 to 2020-05-30)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1519015
title: internet_address_census_it90w-20200428 (2020-04-28 to 2020-05-30)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1519012
title: internet_address_census_it90e-20200428 (2020-04-28 to 2020-05-30)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1520067
title: internet_address_census_it91e-20200710 (2020-07-10 to 2020-08-12)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1520068
title: internet_address_census_it91g-20200710 (2020-07-10 to 2020-08-11)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1520069
title: internet_address_census_it91j-20200710 (2020-07-10 to 2020-08-11)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1520070
title: internet_address_census_it91n-20200710 (2020-07-10 to 2020-08-11)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1506034
title: internet_address_survey_reprobing_it87c-20191014 (2019-10-14 to 2019-10-28)

description: To collect this data, a subset of Internet IP addresses was pinged by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. The response (if it ever came within 11 minutes time interval) was recorded in this data set. Probe was repeated every 11 minutes. In all, 40490 netblocks (/24 subnets) were periodically reprobed.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1506035
title: internet_address_survey_reprobing_it87w-20190911 (2019-09-11 to 2019-09-25)

description: To collect this data, a subset of Internet IP addresses was pinged by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. The response (if it ever came within 11 minutes time interval) was recorded in this data set. Probe was repeated every 11 minutes. In all, 40490 netblocks (/24 subnets) were periodically reprobed.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1517651
title: internet_address_survey_reprobing_it88c-20191213 (2019-12-13 to 2019-12-27)

description: To collect this data, a subset of Internet IP addresses was pinged by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. The response (if it ever came within 11 minutes time interval) was recorded in this data set. Probe was repeated every 11 minutes. In all, 40490 netblocks (/24 subnets) were periodically reprobed.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1517652
title: internet_address_survey_reprobing_it88w-20191127 (2019-11-27 to 2019-12-11)

description: To collect this data, a subset of Internet IP addresses was pinged by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. The response (if it ever came within 11 minutes time interval) was recorded in this data set. Probe was repeated every 11 minutes. In all, 40490 netblocks (/24 subnets) were periodically reprobed.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1518569
title: internet_address_survey_reprobing_it89w-20200219 (2020-02-19 to 2020-03-04)

description: To collect this data, a subset of Internet IP addresses was pinged by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. The response (if it ever came within 11 minutes time interval) was recorded in this data set. Probe was repeated every 11 minutes. In all, 40490 netblocks (/24 subnets) were periodically reprobed.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1519018
title: internet_address_survey_reprobing_it90c-20200520 (2020-05-20 to 2020-06-03)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1519019
title: internet_address_survey_reprobing_it90w-20200428 (2020-04-28 to 2020-05-12)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1517650
title: internet_address_hitlist_it88w-20191127 (2016-12-16 to 2019-12-29)

description: This IP hitlist was generated on 2019-12-29, based on census data from it73w to it88w. Hitlist contains one representative IP address for each /24 block which has appeared to have responsive addresses during it73w - it88w.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1518567
title: internet_address_hitlist_it89w-20200219 (2017-02-22 to 2020-03-22)

description: This IP hitlist was generated on 2020-03-23, based on census data from it74w to it89w. Hitlist contains one representative IP address for each /24 block which has appeared to have responsive addresses during it74w - it89w.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1520066
title: internet_address_census_it91c-20200710 (2020-07-10 to 2020-08-11)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1520071
title: internet_address_census_it91w-20200710 (2020-07-10 to 2020-08-11)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1520074
title: internet_address_survey_reprobing_it91c-20200730 (2020-07-30 to 2020-08-13)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1520075
title: internet_address_survey_reprobing_it91w-20200710 (2020-07-10 to 2020-07-24)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1517649
title: internet_address_history_it88w-20191127 (2016-12-16 to 2019-12-29)

description: This dataset, generated on 2019-12-29, contains all IPv4 addresses who ever responded to our ISI-west (w) censuses, starting from census it11w (internet_address_survey_it11w-20060307), e.g. it11w, it12w, ... Each IP address is given a history of replies (as a bit-string with 's representing ICMP_ECHO_REPLY received from this IP, and 's corresponding to no-replies. We also include numerical scores that are intended to reflect the likelihood that the given IP address will repond in the future. The scores are based on census data from it73w to it88w.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1518562
title: internet_address_census_it89g-20200219 (2020-02-19 to 2020-03-22)

description: To collect this data, an Internet-wide IP address sweep was conducted. Every IP address in the ranges allocated by IANA was pinged once by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. If the response (ICMP_ECHO_REPLY) came, its IP address was recorded in this data-set. In all, over 2.5 billion distinct IP addresses were probed during this experiment.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1519017
title: internet_address_hitlist_it90w-20200428 (2017-04-27 to 2020-05-30)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1520073
title: internet_address_hitlist_it91w-20200710 (2017-06-28 to 2020-08-11)
DOI: 10.23721/109/1518563
title: internet_address_census_it89j-20200219 (2020-02-19 to 2020-03-22)

description: To collect this data, an Internet-wide IP address sweep was conducted. Every IP address in the ranges allocated by IANA was pinged once by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. If the response (ICMP_ECHO_REPLY) came, its IP address was recorded in this data-set. In all, over 2.5 billion distinct IP addresses were probed during this experiment.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1518564
title: internet_address_census_it89n-20200219 (2020-02-19 to 2020-03-22)

description: To collect this data, an Internet-wide IP address sweep was conducted. Every IP address in the ranges allocated by IANA was pinged once by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. If the response (ICMP_ECHO_REPLY) came, its IP address was recorded in this data-set. In all, over 2.5 billion distinct IP addresses were probed during this experiment.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1518595
title: internet_outage_adaptive_a39e-20200101 (2020-01-01 to 2020-04-01)

description: To collect this data, all allocated and responsive Internet IP address blocks were pinged by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. The block status was recorded in this data set. Probe was repeated every 11 minutes, and more quickly when uncertain about block status. In all, approximately 3.5M /24 subnets were periodically probed.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1518565
title: internet_address_census_it89w-20200219 (2020-02-19 to 2020-03-22)

description: To collect this data, an Internet-wide IP address sweep was conducted. Every IP address in the ranges allocated by IANA was pinged once by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. If the response (ICMP_ECHO_REPLY) came, its IP address was recorded in this data-set. In all, over 2.5 billion distinct IP addresses were probed during this experiment.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1518568
title: internet_address_survey_reprobing_it89c-20200306 (2020-03-06 to 2020-03-20)

description: To collect this data, a subset of Internet IP addresses was pinged by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. The response (if it ever came within 11 minutes time interval) was recorded in this data set. Probe was repeated every 11 minutes. In all, 40490 netblocks (/24 subnets) were periodically reprobed.
DOI: 10.23721/109/1518596
title: internet_outage_adaptive_a39g-20200101 (2020-01-01 to 2020-04-01)

description: To collect this data, all allocated and responsive Internet IP address blocks were pinged by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. The block status was recorded in this data set. Probe was repeated every 11 minutes, and more quickly when uncertain about block status. In all, approximately 3.5M /24 subnets were periodically probed.
DOI: 10.21258/1767920
title: Swiss national forest inventory - Result table No. 898249
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.13311617
title: HPOFiller_data

description: This is the prediction result generated by HPOFiller which contains the inferred protein-phenotype associations. The first column is the rank, the second column is the UniProt ID of protein, the third one is the HPO term ID, and the last one is the predictive score. The items are sorted by score.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.13311617.v2
title: HPOFiller_data

description: This is the prediction result generated by HPOFiller which contains the inferred protein-phenotype associations. The first column is the rank, the second column is the UniProt ID of protein, the third one is the HPO term ID, and the last one is the predictive score. The items are sorted by score.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.13311617.v1
title: HPOFiller_data

description: This is the prediction result generated by HPOFiller which contains the inferred protein-phenotype associations. The first column is the rank, the second column is the UniProt ID of protein, the third one is the HPO term ID, and the last one is the predictive score. The items are sorted by score.
DOI: 10.21258/1733051
title: Swiss national forest inventory - Result table No. 899474
DOI: 10.34740/kaggle/dsv/1388757
title: Covid-19_FASTA file
DOI: 10.21258/1733025
title: Swiss national forest inventory - Result table No. 899355
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.13487202.v1
title: Chen et al., Supporting Information.pdf

description: Dataset of the article titled "Effects of land use change type on soil microbial attributes and their controls: Data synthesis", with information of Appendix Data sources (Supporting Information 2) and study references, means and SD and n (for microbial attributes), and other relevant variables (Supporting Information 3).
DOI: 10.21258/1762809
title: Swiss national forest inventory - Result table No. 899497
DOI: 10.21258/1733209
title: Swiss national forest inventory - Result table No. 899363
DOI: 10.21258/1745193
title: Swiss national forest inventory - Result table No. 899054
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.13487202
title: Chen et al., Supporting Information

description: Dataset of the article titled "Effects of land use change type on soil microbial attributes and their controls: Data synthesis", with information of Appendix Data sources (Supporting Information 2) and study references, means and SD and n (for microbial attributes), and other relevant variables (Supporting Information 3).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.13487202.v3
title: Chen et al., Supporting Information

description: Dataset of the article titled "Effects of land use change type on soil microbial attributes and their controls: Data synthesis", with information of Appendix Data sources (Supporting Information 2) and study references, means and SD and n (for microbial attributes), and other relevant variables (Supporting Information 3).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.13487202.v2
title: Chen et al., Supporting Information

description: Dataset of the article titled "Effects of land use change type on soil microbial attributes and their controls: Data synthesis", with information of Appendix Data sources (Supporting Information 2) and study references, means and SD and n (for microbial attributes), and other relevant variables (Supporting Information 3).
DOI: 10.21258/1766423
title: Swiss national forest inventory - Result table No. 899520
DOI: 10.21258/1754797
title: Swiss national forest inventory - Result table No. 898354
DOI: 10.21258/1759828
title: Swiss national forest inventory - Result table No. 892923
DOI: 10.21258/1768322
title: Swiss national forest inventory - Result table No. 891725
DOI: 10.21258/1741545
title: Swiss national forest inventory - Result table No. 891780
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.13487265
title: Data of loop segmentation.zip

description: It is the raw data of FLL/PLL segmentation.It also includes the measured data of experimental verification.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.13487265.v1
title: Data of loop segmentation.zip

description: It is the raw data of FLL/PLL segmentation.It also includes the measured data of experimental verification.
DOI: 10.21258/1740564
title: Swiss national forest inventory - Result table No. 902239
DOI: 10.21258/1763370
title: Swiss national forest inventory - Result table No. 897291
DOI: 10.21258/1759689
title: Swiss national forest inventory - Result table No. 898807
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4391461
title: Data pertaining to 'Can artesian groundwater and earthquake-induced aquifer leakage exacerbate the manifestation of liquefaction?'

description: Geodatabase (ArcGIS 10.5.1), Excel files and mp4 video to accompany: Cox, S.C.; van Ballegooy, S.; Rutter, H.K.; Harte, D.S.; Holden, C.; Gulley, A.K.; Lacrosse, V.; Manga, M. (in press) Can artesian groundwater and earthquake-induced aquifer leakage exacerbate the manifestation of liquefaction? Engineering Geology Manuscript ENGEO 105982. Vast quantities of liquefaction ejecta repeatedly inundated properties during the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence in New Zealand, resulting in differential ground surface subsidence and significant damage to buildings and urban infrastructure. There are strong spatial correlations between the occurrence of ejected sediment with groundwater pressure in deep aquifers. When geotechnical testing sites are grouped according to liquefaction vulnerability indices (to control variance relating to shaking strength, water table depth, and soil profile strength), places where ‘minor’ and ‘moderate-severe’ liquefaction occurred during the Mw6.2 Christchurch earthquake had distinctly higher aquifer pressure than sites where liquefaction was not observed. Together with observations of earthquake-induced pressure changes and inferred transfer of groundwater from deep aquifers to shallower levels, an interpretation is that leakage from aquifers with artesian (above ground) pressure provided an additional driving mechanism for surface manifestation of water and sediment. It is surmised that above-ground aquifer pressures further promoted suffusion and piping along fractures, flow-pathways and liquefied horizons. The Mw6.2 Christchurch earthquake is presented as an example where leakage of artesian groundwater likely contributed to the near-surface liquefaction-induced ground damage. The process can result in underprediction of liquefaction vulnerability so needs to be considered when evaluating potential for earthquake-induced liquefaction and ground damage wherever groundwater is confined.
description: {"references": ["Cox, S.C.; van Ballegooy, S.; Rutter, H.K.; Harte, D.S.; Holden, C.; Gulley, A.K.; Lacrosse, V.; Manga, M. (in press) Can artesian groundwater and earthquake-induced aquifer leakage exacerbate the manifestation of liquefaction? Engineering Geology Manuscript ENGEO 105982."]}
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4391460
title: Data pertaining to 'Can artesian groundwater and earthquake-induced aquifer leakage exacerbate the manifestation of liquefaction?'

description: Geodatabase (ArcGIS 10.5.1), Excel files and mp4 video to accompany: Cox, S.C.; van Ballegooy, S.; Rutter, H.K.; Harte, D.S.; Holden, C.; Gulley, A.K.; Lacrosse, V.; Manga, M. (in press) Can artesian groundwater and earthquake-induced aquifer leakage exacerbate the manifestation of liquefaction? Engineering Geology Manuscript ENGEO 105982. Vast quantities of liquefaction ejecta repeatedly inundated properties during the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence in New Zealand, resulting in differential ground surface subsidence and significant damage to buildings and urban infrastructure. There are strong spatial correlations between the occurrence of ejected sediment with groundwater pressure in deep aquifers. When geotechnical testing sites are grouped according to liquefaction vulnerability indices (to control variance relating to shaking strength, water table depth, and soil profile strength), places where ‘minor’ and ‘moderate-severe’ liquefaction occurred during the Mw6.2 Christchurch earthquake had distinctly higher aquifer pressure than sites where liquefaction was not observed. Together with observations of earthquake-induced pressure changes and inferred transfer of groundwater from deep aquifers to shallower levels, an interpretation is that leakage from aquifers with artesian (above ground) pressure provided an additional driving mechanism for surface manifestation of water and sediment. It is surmised that above-ground aquifer pressures further promoted suffusion and piping along fractures, flow-pathways and liquefied horizons. The Mw6.2 Christchurch earthquake is presented as an example where leakage of artesian groundwater likely contributed to the near-surface liquefaction-induced ground damage. The process can result in underprediction of liquefaction vulnerability so needs to be considered when evaluating potential for earthquake-induced liquefaction and ground damage wherever groundwater is confined.
description: {"references": ["Cox, S.C.; van Ballegooy, S.; Rutter, H.K.; Harte, D.S.; Holden, C.; Gulley, A.K.; Lacrosse, V.; Manga, M. (in press) Can artesian groundwater and earthquake-induced aquifer leakage exacerbate the manifestation of liquefaction? Engineering Geology Manuscript ENGEO 105982."]}
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.13487301
title: Wang et al.——Precipitation Regulates the Livestock Dung Seed Bank Through Aboveground Vegetation in an Arid Basin.xlsx

description: Wang et al.——Precipitation Regulates the Livestock Dung Seed Bank Through Aboveground Vegetation in an Arid Basin