cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517115
title: Supplement 1. R code used to calculate percent error of estimated richness in the full data set using subsets of plots of each habitat type to calculate shared species overlap among habitat types.

description: File List MS11-0206.Rcode.R (md5: e99ae92c8e95f222b82883641b96cf0d) Description R code used to calculate percent error of estimated richness in a full data set using subsets of plots from each habitat type to calculate shared species overlap among habitat types. Input data should be a plot by species matrix with an additional column denoting the habitat type of each of plot. In this study, the habitat types were A (arable fields), G (grasslands), P (pastures), and W (woodlots or forests). Two, three, and four way overlap terms were calculated separately using Eqs. 2 and 3, and were combined together as in Eq. 1 to estimate richness in the full data set.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517115.v1
title: Supplement 1. R code used to calculate percent error of estimated richness in the full data set using subsets of plots of each habitat type to calculate shared species overlap among habitat types.

description: File List MS11-0206.Rcode.R (md5: e99ae92c8e95f222b82883641b96cf0d) Description R code used to calculate percent error of estimated richness in a full data set using subsets of plots from each habitat type to calculate shared species overlap among habitat types. Input data should be a plot by species matrix with an additional column denoting the habitat type of each of plot. In this study, the habitat types were A (arable fields), G (grasslands), P (pastures), and W (woodlots or forests). Two, three, and four way overlap terms were calculated separately using Eqs. 2 and 3, and were combined together as in Eq. 1 to estimate richness in the full data set.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517112
title: Appendix A. Quotient of similarity between each of 65 specific habitats and each of four general habitat categories based on a binary matrix with 251 species.

description: Quotient of similarity between each of 65 specific habitats and each of four general habitat categories based on a binary matrix with 251 species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517112.v1
title: Appendix A. Quotient of similarity between each of 65 specific habitats and each of four general habitat categories based on a binary matrix with 251 species.

description: Quotient of similarity between each of 65 specific habitats and each of four general habitat categories based on a binary matrix with 251 species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517109
title: Appendix B. Habitat indication scores for 251 identified species encountered in upland forests and adjacent edges throughout north central Mississippi.

description: Habitat indication scores for 251 identified species encountered in upland forests and adjacent edges throughout north central Mississippi.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517109.v1
title: Appendix B. Habitat indication scores for 251 identified species encountered in upland forests and adjacent edges throughout north central Mississippi.

description: Habitat indication scores for 251 identified species encountered in upland forests and adjacent edges throughout north central Mississippi.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517106
title: Appendix C. Responses of selected groundcover plants to tornado damage.

description: Responses of selected groundcover plants to tornado damage.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517106.v1
title: Appendix C. Responses of selected groundcover plants to tornado damage.

description: Responses of selected groundcover plants to tornado damage.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517103
title: Appendix A. Mean frequency and cover of plant species observed in the three experimental treatments in 2004 (pre treatment), 2007 (1–2 yr), and 2009 (3–4 yr).

description: Mean frequency and cover of plant species observed in the three experimental treatments in 2004 (pre treatment), 2007 (1–2 yr), and 2009 (3–4 yr).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517103.v1
title: Appendix A. Mean frequency and cover of plant species observed in the three experimental treatments in 2004 (pre treatment), 2007 (1–2 yr), and 2009 (3–4 yr).

description: Mean frequency and cover of plant species observed in the three experimental treatments in 2004 (pre treatment), 2007 (1–2 yr), and 2009 (3–4 yr).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517100
title: Appendix B. Photographs illustrating posttreatment conditions in burned (broadcast) and unburned (pile-burned) plots, recovery of burn-pile scars, and gopher disturbance.

description: Photographs illustrating posttreatment conditions in burned (broadcast) and unburned (pile-burned) plots, recovery of burn-pile scars, and gopher disturbance.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517100.v1
title: Appendix B. Photographs illustrating posttreatment conditions in burned (broadcast) and unburned (pile-burned) plots, recovery of burn-pile scars, and gopher disturbance.

description: Photographs illustrating posttreatment conditions in burned (broadcast) and unburned (pile-burned) plots, recovery of burn-pile scars, and gopher disturbance.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517097
title: Appendix A. Supplementary figures showing trajectories of individual transects at Santa Rita Experimental Range through time over ordination space.

description: Supplementary figures showing trajectories of individual transects at Santa Rita Experimental Range through time over ordination space.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517097.v1
title: Appendix A. Supplementary figures showing trajectories of individual transects at Santa Rita Experimental Range through time over ordination space.

description: Supplementary figures showing trajectories of individual transects at Santa Rita Experimental Range through time over ordination space.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517094
title: Appendix A. Literature covered by this review.

description: Literature covered by this review.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517094.v1
title: Appendix A. Literature covered by this review.

description: Literature covered by this review.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517091
title: Appendix B. Tukey post hoc test of the different categories from Fig. 3, tested against each other.

description: Tukey post hoc test of the different categories from Fig. 3, tested against each other.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517091.v1
title: Appendix B. Tukey post hoc test of the different categories from Fig. 3, tested against each other.

description: Tukey post hoc test of the different categories from Fig. 3, tested against each other.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517088
title: Appendix C. Global annual mean precipitation map (based on Hijmans et al. 2005, in mm) combined with our product indicating areas with a precipitation CV &lt; 33%.

description: Global annual mean precipitation map (based on Hijmans et al. 2005, in mm) combined with our product indicating areas with a precipitation CV &lt; 33%.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517088.v1
title: Appendix C. Global annual mean precipitation map (based on Hijmans et al. 2005, in mm) combined with our product indicating areas with a precipitation CV &lt; 33%.

description: Global annual mean precipitation map (based on Hijmans et al. 2005, in mm) combined with our product indicating areas with a precipitation CV &lt; 33%.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517085
title: Supplement 1. High resolution tiff file of the map on climatic variability based on 18 669 climate stations.

description: File List Prec_cv.zip (md5: 77b70a2389e6149d159d8e8ff4036d5e) Description The file prec_cv.zip contains a georeferenced tagged image file, prec_cv.tif, which can be imported into ArcGIS. It contains a GIS layer of the CV of annual precipitation on a global scale. The data file is zipped in order to compress its size (38 MB unzipped).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517085.v1
title: Supplement 1. High resolution tiff file of the map on climatic variability based on 18 669 climate stations.

description: File List Prec_cv.zip (md5: 77b70a2389e6149d159d8e8ff4036d5e) Description The file prec_cv.zip contains a georeferenced tagged image file, prec_cv.tif, which can be imported into ArcGIS. It contains a GIS layer of the CV of annual precipitation on a global scale. The data file is zipped in order to compress its size (38 MB unzipped).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517082
title: Appendix A. Age distribution augmentation.

description: Age distribution augmentation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517082.v1
title: Appendix A. Age distribution augmentation.

description: Age distribution augmentation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517079
title: Appendix B. Cross-validation.

description: Cross-validation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517079.v1
title: Appendix B. Cross-validation.

description: Cross-validation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517076
title: Appendix C. Sensitivity analysis.

description: Sensitivity analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517076.v1
title: Appendix C. Sensitivity analysis.

description: Sensitivity analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517073
title: Appendix A. Input values of the MOCA-Flux (Modeling of Carbon Assessment and Flux) model.

description: Input values of the MOCA-Flux (Modeling of Carbon Assessment and Flux) model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517073.v1
title: Appendix A. Input values of the MOCA-Flux (Modeling of Carbon Assessment and Flux) model.

description: Input values of the MOCA-Flux (Modeling of Carbon Assessment and Flux) model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517070
title: Appendix A. Summary results of Eq. 1 model for each year, including similarity at 100 km.

description: Summary results of Eq. 1 model for each year, including similarity at 100 km.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517067
title: Appendix B. Similarity of community composition between pairs of subregions vs. the geographic distance between pairs of subregions for each year.

description: Similarity of community composition between pairs of subregions vs. the geographic distance between pairs of subregions for each year.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517067.v1
title: Appendix B. Similarity of community composition between pairs of subregions vs. the geographic distance between pairs of subregions for each year.

description: Similarity of community composition between pairs of subregions vs. the geographic distance between pairs of subregions for each year.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517064
title: Appendix C. Community composition for each subregion listing dominant species comprising up to 85% of biomass.

description: Community composition for each subregion listing dominant species comprising up to 85% of biomass.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517064.v1
title: Appendix C. Community composition for each subregion listing dominant species comprising up to 85% of biomass.

description: Community composition for each subregion listing dominant species comprising up to 85% of biomass.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517061
title: Appendix D. Similarity of species composition matrix each year from 1971 to 2006 compared to a reference year 1970.

description: Similarity of species composition matrix each year from 1971 to 2006 compared to a reference year 1970.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517061.v1
title: Appendix D. Similarity of species composition matrix each year from 1971 to 2006 compared to a reference year 1970.

description: Similarity of species composition matrix each year from 1971 to 2006 compared to a reference year 1970.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517058
title: Appendix A. ANOVA tables describing effects of reserves on lobster trap yield, size, and density on the seafloor, comparisons of research vs. fishing trap yields, and effort distributions before and after reserves.

description: ANOVA tables describing effects of reserves on lobster trap yield, size, and density on the seafloor, comparisons of research vs. fishing trap yields, and effort distributions before and after reserves.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517058.v1
title: Appendix A. ANOVA tables describing effects of reserves on lobster trap yield, size, and density on the seafloor, comparisons of research vs. fishing trap yields, and effort distributions before and after reserves.

description: ANOVA tables describing effects of reserves on lobster trap yield, size, and density on the seafloor, comparisons of research vs. fishing trap yields, and effort distributions before and after reserves.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517055
title: Appendix A. Methods and results of quasi-extinction analysis.

description: Methods and results of quasi-extinction analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517055.v1
title: Appendix A. Methods and results of quasi-extinction analysis.

description: Methods and results of quasi-extinction analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517052
title: Appendix B. Results of sensitivity analysis.

description: Results of sensitivity analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517052.v1
title: Appendix B. Results of sensitivity analysis.

description: Results of sensitivity analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517049
title: Appendix C. The importance of the relative rates of decay for determining optimal spacing.

description: The importance of the relative rates of decay for determining optimal spacing.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517049.v1
title: Appendix C. The importance of the relative rates of decay for determining optimal spacing.

description: The importance of the relative rates of decay for determining optimal spacing.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517046
title: Appendix A. Nine figures showing the sensitivity to key parameters of long term harvest and probability of collapse.

description: Nine figures showing the sensitivity to key parameters of long term harvest and probability of collapse.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517046.v1
title: Appendix A. Nine figures showing the sensitivity to key parameters of long term harvest and probability of collapse.

description: Nine figures showing the sensitivity to key parameters of long term harvest and probability of collapse.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517043
title: Appendix A. Tables summarizing greenhouse gas flux statistics and cumulative annual fluxes for each of study sites from July 2007 to June 2009.

description: Tables summarizing greenhouse gas flux statistics and cumulative annual fluxes for each of study sites from July 2007 to June 2009.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517040
title: Appendix A. Conditional probability tables for response nodes in the Bayesian belief network (BBN).

description: Conditional probability tables for response nodes in the Bayesian belief network (BBN).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517040.v1
title: Appendix A. Conditional probability tables for response nodes in the Bayesian belief network (BBN).

description: Conditional probability tables for response nodes in the Bayesian belief network (BBN).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517037
title: Appendix B. Case file used to test BBN.

description: Case file used to test BBN.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517037.v1
title: Appendix B. Case file used to test BBN.

description: Case file used to test BBN.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517034
title: Appendix A. A table showing AUC values as indicators of model performance together with final model structure regarding hydrological variables, both in relation to the two vegetation types and two age classes.

description: A table showing AUC values as indicators of model performance together with final model structure regarding hydrological variables, both in relation to the two vegetation types and two age classes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517034.v1
title: Appendix A. A table showing AUC values as indicators of model performance together with final model structure regarding hydrological variables, both in relation to the two vegetation types and two age classes.

description: A table showing AUC values as indicators of model performance together with final model structure regarding hydrological variables, both in relation to the two vegetation types and two age classes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517031
title: Appendix B. A figure depicting both a potential of 32-ha additional softwood forest and local water-level changes through plantings compared with the current-state scenario, calculated by the 2D-HN model.

description: A figure depicting both a potential of 32-ha additional softwood forest and local water-level changes through plantings compared with the current-state scenario, calculated by the 2D-HN model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517031.v1
title: Appendix B. A figure depicting both a potential of 32-ha additional softwood forest and local water-level changes through plantings compared with the current-state scenario, calculated by the 2D-HN model.

description: A figure depicting both a potential of 32-ha additional softwood forest and local water-level changes through plantings compared with the current-state scenario, calculated by the 2D-HN model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517028
title: Appendix A. A description of the input parameters needed to create an ECOPATH mass balance, their units, and empirical relations necessary to calculate them.

description: A description of the input parameters needed to create an ECOPATH mass balance, their units, and empirical relations necessary to calculate them.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517028.v1
title: Appendix A. A description of the input parameters needed to create an ECOPATH mass balance, their units, and empirical relations necessary to calculate them.

description: A description of the input parameters needed to create an ECOPATH mass balance, their units, and empirical relations necessary to calculate them.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517025
title: Appendix B. A list of the sources of all parameters used for each trophic group in each mass balance, including primary parameters used in empirical relations as well as input and output parameters used for the mass balance.

description: A list of the sources of all parameters used for each trophic group in each mass balance, including primary parameters used in empirical relations as well as input and output parameters used for the mass balance.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517022
title: Appendix C. The equations used to solve the linear dynamics as well as the biomass and relative growth rate values for each trophic group in each year.

description: The equations used to solve the linear dynamics as well as the biomass and relative growth rate values for each trophic group in each year.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517022.v1
title: Appendix C. The equations used to solve the linear dynamics as well as the biomass and relative growth rate values for each trophic group in each year.

description: The equations used to solve the linear dynamics as well as the biomass and relative growth rate values for each trophic group in each year.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517019
title: Appendix A. A table showing constituent aquatic and plant litter variables in top linear regression models for predicting amphibian production, in terms of biomass.

description: A table showing constituent aquatic and plant litter variables in top linear regression models for predicting amphibian production, in terms of biomass.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517019.v1
title: Appendix A. A table showing constituent aquatic and plant litter variables in top linear regression models for predicting amphibian production, in terms of biomass.

description: A table showing constituent aquatic and plant litter variables in top linear regression models for predicting amphibian production, in terms of biomass.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517016
title: Appendix B. A table showing results of “drop one” analyses for components of all models within 2 AIC of top models.

description: A table showing results of “drop one” analyses for components of all models within 2 AIC of top models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517016.v1
title: Appendix B. A table showing results of “drop one” analyses for components of all models within 2 AIC of top models.

description: A table showing results of “drop one” analyses for components of all models within 2 AIC of top models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517013
title: Appendix C. A table showing summary statistics for linear models within 2 AIC of top models.

description: A table showing summary statistics for linear models within 2 AIC of top models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517013.v1
title: Appendix C. A table showing summary statistics for linear models within 2 AIC of top models.

description: A table showing summary statistics for linear models within 2 AIC of top models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517010
title: Appendix A. Probability of occupancy for eight species of small mammals in response to pine basal area (Fig. 3) with standard errors.

description: Probability of occupancy for eight species of small mammals in response to pine basal area (Fig. 3) with standard errors.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517004
title: Appendix A. Methods used to create a 1987 prefire vegetation map and accuracy assessment results.

description: Methods used to create a 1987 prefire vegetation map and accuracy assessment results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517004.v1
title: Appendix A. Methods used to create a 1987 prefire vegetation map and accuracy assessment results.

description: Methods used to create a 1987 prefire vegetation map and accuracy assessment results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517001
title: Appendix A. Parameter estimation.

description: Parameter estimation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517001.v1
title: Appendix A. Parameter estimation.

description: Parameter estimation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516998
title: Appendix B. Model assumptions.

description: Model assumptions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516998.v1
title: Appendix B. Model assumptions.

description: Model assumptions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516989
title: Appendix A. A list of climate variables calculated by the Rehfeldt climate model.

description: A list of climate variables calculated by the Rehfeldt climate model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516989.v1
title: Appendix A. A list of climate variables calculated by the Rehfeldt climate model.

description: A list of climate variables calculated by the Rehfeldt climate model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516986
title: Appendix B. Parameter estimates, 95% approximate confidence intervals, and correlation information for the model including minimum temperature of the coldest month as the transfer distance variable and as the climate-at-seed-source variable.

description: Parameter estimates, 95% approximate confidence intervals, and correlation information for the model including minimum temperature of the coldest month as the transfer distance variable and as the climate-at-seed-source variable.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516983
title: Appendix C. Diagnostic plots and R script for the selected model (Eq. 1 and Table 2 of main text).

description: Diagnostic plots and R script for the selected model (Eq. 1 and Table 2 of main text).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516980
title: Appendix A. Methods for creating current-observed, current-predicted, and future-predicted species distribution models for whitebark pine within British Columbia, Canada.

description: Methods for creating current-observed, current-predicted, and future-predicted species distribution models for whitebark pine within British Columbia, Canada.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516980.v1
title: Appendix A. Methods for creating current-observed, current-predicted, and future-predicted species distribution models for whitebark pine within British Columbia, Canada.

description: Methods for creating current-observed, current-predicted, and future-predicted species distribution models for whitebark pine within British Columbia, Canada.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516977
title: Appendix B. Whitebark pine germination, survival, and growth summary by population, site, and seed treatment.

description: Whitebark pine germination, survival, and growth summary by population, site, and seed treatment.