cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110681656
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2177.103, Fort 2177.103

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2177.103 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Bottom edge, left edge, right edge broken.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110678418
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1325.101, Fort 1325.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seal ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 1325.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken right side of tablet. Crack on obverse. Broken upper edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110681655
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2177.103, Fort 2177.103

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2177.103 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Bottom edge, left edge, right edge broken.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110678414
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1325.101, Fort 1325.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seal ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 1325.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken right side of tablet. Crack on obverse. Broken upper edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110681644
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2177.103, Fort 2177.103

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2177.103 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Bottom edge, left edge, right edge broken.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110678198
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1325.101, Fort 1325.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seal ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 1325.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken right side of tablet. Crack on obverse. Broken upper edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110681627
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2177.103, Fort 2177.103

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2177.103 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Bottom edge, left edge, right edge broken.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110678184
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1325.101, Fort 1325.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seal ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 1325.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken right side of tablet. Crack on obverse. Broken upper edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110681625
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2177.103, Fort 2177.103

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2177.103 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Bottom edge, left edge, right edge broken.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.30585032
title: Surface characteristics limit the vertical mobility of an invasive reptile: Raw data

description: Preventing the spread of small, cryptic invasive reptiles poses an ongoing challenge for conservation and biosecurity worldwide. Physical exclusion barriers offer a potentially low-cost, non-toxic tool for limiting dispersal, but their effectiveness depends on, among other factors, a detailed understanding of how surface properties influence animal movement. We tested four commonly available fencing materials—polypropylene fabric, woven polypropylene, polythene sheet, and acrylic sheet—as potential barriers to climbing by a small Australian skink, <i>Lampropholis delicata </i>(Scincidae). Experiments with 18 adult skinks were conducted in enclosures under both wet and dry conditions. We quantified surface roughness using four metrics: arithmetic average roughness (Ra), total height of profile (Rt), mean spacing of profile irregularities (Rsm) and Skewness (Rsk). Climbing frequency was highest on the roughest material, polypropylene fabric (Ra=22.5, Rt=170, Rsm=466.5µm), with up to 60% of individuals ascending. In contrast, the smoother surfaces, polythene and acrylic, limited climbing to just 5% of trials, with climbs occurring only under wet conditions. This suggests that surface water may enhance adhesion and reduce the effectiveness of smooth barriers. Our findings indicate that simple vertical drift fences are unlikely to effectively manage the spread of <i>L. delicata</i>, particularly in wet environments and underscore the importance of incorporating surface roughness thresholds and moisture conditions into barrier design. Polythene sheet, with a Ra below 29, shows promise for indoor containment but would require modifications such as anti-climb lips for outdoor use.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.30585032.v1
title: Surface characteristics limit the vertical mobility of an invasive reptile: Raw data

description: Preventing the spread of small, cryptic invasive reptiles poses an ongoing challenge for conservation and biosecurity worldwide. Physical exclusion barriers offer a potentially low-cost, non-toxic tool for limiting dispersal, but their effectiveness depends on, among other factors, a detailed understanding of how surface properties influence animal movement. We tested four commonly available fencing materials—polypropylene fabric, woven polypropylene, polythene sheet, and acrylic sheet—as potential barriers to climbing by a small Australian skink, <i>Lampropholis delicata </i>(Scincidae). Experiments with 18 adult skinks were conducted in enclosures under both wet and dry conditions. We quantified surface roughness using four metrics: arithmetic average roughness (Ra), total height of profile (Rt), mean spacing of profile irregularities (Rsm) and Skewness (Rsk). Climbing frequency was highest on the roughest material, polypropylene fabric (Ra=22.5, Rt=170, Rsm=466.5µm), with up to 60% of individuals ascending. In contrast, the smoother surfaces, polythene and acrylic, limited climbing to just 5% of trials, with climbs occurring only under wet conditions. This suggests that surface water may enhance adhesion and reduce the effectiveness of smooth barriers. Our findings indicate that simple vertical drift fences are unlikely to effectively manage the spread of <i>L. delicata</i>, particularly in wet environments and underscore the importance of incorporating surface roughness thresholds and moisture conditions into barrier design. Polythene sheet, with a Ra below 29, shows promise for indoor containment but would require modifications such as anti-climb lips for outdoor use.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110678177
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1325.101, Fort 1325.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seal ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 1325.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken right side of tablet. Crack on obverse. Broken upper edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110681620
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2177.103, Fort 2177.103

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2177.103 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Bottom edge, left edge, right edge broken.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110678169
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1325.101, Fort 1325.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seal ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 1325.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken right side of tablet. Crack on obverse. Broken upper edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110681613
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2177.103, Fort 2177.103

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2177.103 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Bottom edge, left edge, right edge broken.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110678155
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1325.101, Fort 1325.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seal ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 1325.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken right side of tablet. Crack on obverse. Broken upper edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110681609
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2177.103, Fort 2177.103

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2177.103 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Bottom edge, left edge, right edge broken.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110678111
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1325.101, Fort 1325.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seal ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 1325.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken right side of tablet. Crack on obverse. Broken upper edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110681598
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2177.103, Fort 2177.103

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2177.103 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Bottom edge, left edge, right edge broken.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110678101
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1325.101, Fort 1325.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seal ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 1325.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken right side of tablet. Crack on obverse. Broken upper edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110681594
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2177.103, Fort 2177.103

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2177.103 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Bottom edge, left edge, right edge broken.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110678096
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1325.101, Fort 1325.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seal ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 1325.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken right side of tablet. Crack on obverse. Broken upper edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110681106
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2173.101, Fort 2173.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2173.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Three fragments piece together? Upper and lower left of tablet broken off, as well as smaller are on upper right.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110678092
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1325.101, Fort 1325.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seal ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 1325.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken right side of tablet. Crack on obverse. Broken upper edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110681107
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2173.101, Fort 2173.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2173.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Three fragments piece together? Upper and lower left of tablet broken off, as well as smaller are on upper right.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17575743
title: De la mention Made in à la marque made in : Une clarification à partir de la perception des acteurs du marché congolais de la mode

description: L’objectif de cet article est de montrer que le terme Made in, souvent perçu comme une simple indication du lieu de fabrication d’un produit, peut, dans certains contextes, revêtir les attributs d’une véritable marque. Une étude exploratoire qualitative réalisée sur le marché congolais des produits de mode, à partir de 34 entretiens semi-directifs auprès de 23 consommateurs et 11 vendeurs, révèle l’existence empirique de la « marque made in ». L’étude renseigne que cette marque émerge spontanément de l’imaginaire collectif des consommateurs, alors que le concept de marque pays, qui lui est à la fois connexe et distincte, résulte d’une décision formelle des autorités publiques. Ancrée dans la théorie de la catégorisation, la conceptualisation de la marque made in permettra non seulement de saisir son rôle dans la compétitivité économique, mais également d’alléger le contenu de la marque pays, en isolant sa dimension économique associée aux activités productives. De nature multidimensionnelle, la précision conceptuelle de la marque pays demeure une préoccupation pour la recherche académique en marketing territorial.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17575744
title: De la mention Made in à la marque made in : Une clarification à partir de la perception des acteurs du marché congolais de la mode

description: L’objectif de cet article est de montrer que le terme Made in, souvent perçu comme une simple indication du lieu de fabrication d’un produit, peut, dans certains contextes, revêtir les attributs d’une véritable marque. Une étude exploratoire qualitative réalisée sur le marché congolais des produits de mode, à partir de 34 entretiens semi-directifs auprès de 23 consommateurs et 11 vendeurs, révèle l’existence empirique de la « marque made in ». L’étude renseigne que cette marque émerge spontanément de l’imaginaire collectif des consommateurs, alors que le concept de marque pays, qui lui est à la fois connexe et distincte, résulte d’une décision formelle des autorités publiques. Ancrée dans la théorie de la catégorisation, la conceptualisation de la marque made in permettra non seulement de saisir son rôle dans la compétitivité économique, mais également d’alléger le contenu de la marque pays, en isolant sa dimension économique associée aux activités productives. De nature multidimensionnelle, la précision conceptuelle de la marque pays demeure une préoccupation pour la recherche académique en marketing territorial.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110678089
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1325.101, Fort 1325.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seal ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 1325.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken right side of tablet. Crack on obverse. Broken upper edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110681077
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2173.101, Fort 2173.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2173.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Three fragments piece together? Upper and lower left of tablet broken off, as well as smaller are on upper right.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110678415
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1325.101, Fort 1325.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seal ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 1325.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken right side of tablet. Crack on obverse. Broken upper edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110681071
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2173.101, Fort 2173.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2173.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Three fragments piece together? Upper and lower left of tablet broken off, as well as smaller are on upper right.