DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.28612760.v7
title: <b>NOTICE TO PLAGIARIST Mark Serdtse: THE ORIGINAL IS ALWAYS VISIBLE</b>

description: <b>Hello everyone,</b><b>I know that research is tough</b><b>I wish you all strength and courage.</b><br><b><i>This message is addressed to plagiarists, not to those who seek knowledge honestly and are willing to share and collaborate.</i></b><br><b>Since the publication of ∆ngular Theory 0.0, several attempts have been made to appropriate its concepts and mathematical structures without proper acknowledgment.</b><b>The latest case: Mark Serdtse (UMST-G: Informational Gravity and the Quantum Nature of Entropy, 2025).</b><b>This document directly borrows fundamental ideas, mathematical frameworks, and numerical predictions from ∆ngular Theory 0.0 without explicit citation.</b><b>While some terminology has been changed, the core structure remains identical :</b><b>--- IDENTIFIED INTELLECTUAL REUSE</b><b>1️⃣ MODIFIED FIELD EQUATIONS</b><b>→ ∆ngular Theory 0.0 introduces an angular tensor ∆ to modify Einstein’s equations: G_{\mu\nu} = 8\pi G \left(T_{\mu\nu} + \Delta_{\mu\nu} \right)</b><b>→ UMST-G introduces an "entropic tensor" Jₘⁿ, but applies the same corrections: G_{\mu\nu} = 8\pi G (T_{\mu\nu} + \alpha I_{\mu\nu} + \beta J_{\mu\nu}^{\text{entropy}})</b><b>→ Structural duplication disguised under terminology shifts.</b><br><b>2️⃣ PREDICTIONS FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVES</b><b>→ ∆ngular Theory 0.0 predicts a scalar-to-tensor frequency ratio of 0.67–0.73: f_{\text{scalar}} = \gamma f_{\text{tensor}}</b><b>→ UMST-G predicts the exact same range, claiming it arises from an entropic correction: f_{\text{scalar}} = \gamma f_{\text{tensor}}</b><b>→ Exact numerical reproduction of ∆ngular's frequency scaling, disguised under an entropic field interpretation.</b><br><b>3️⃣ GALACTIC ROTATION CURVES</b><b>→ ∆ngular Theory 0.0 explains anomalies in galactic rotation curves using an angular torsion parameter: v^4 \propto \Delta\theta_0 \cdot M_{\text{baryon}}</b><b>→ UMST-G introduces an entropy gradient but preserves the same mathematical structure: \Phi_{\text{eff}}(r) = \Phi_{\text{Newton}}(r) + \beta S(r) → Identical formulation of gravitational corrections, repackaged under a different name.</b><br><b>4️⃣ GRAVITATIONAL LENSING MODIFICATIONS</b><b>→ ∆ngular Theory 0.0 modifies spacetime metrics based on the structuring of ∆θ₀.</b><b>→ UMST-G introduces an "entropic correction" to the metric but arrives at the same distortions.</b><b>→ Structural equivalence hidden by semantic modifications.</b><br><b>5️⃣ COSMOLOGY AND THE AGE OF THE UNIVERSE → ∆ngular Theory 0.0 modifies the Friedmann equation using a fundamental angular structure: T = \frac{1}{H_0} \int_0^1 \frac{\mathrm{d}s}{s} \, \sqrt{\frac{S_{\text{eff}}(s)}{\mathcal{T}(s)}}</b><b>→ UMST-G modifies Friedmann’s equation by adding an entropy contribution: H^2 = \frac{8\pi G}{3} (\rho_m + \rho_r + \rho_\Lambda + \rho_S) → Identical integration structure, merely substituting angular quantization with entropy terms.</b><br><b>CONCLUSION: IS THIS PLAGIARISM?</b><b>✅ Identical conceptual framework → The ideas have been reformulated but follow the same logic.</b><b>✅ Copied equations → The angular torsion of ∆ngular has simply been replaced by an entropic field.</b><b>✅ Same numerical predictions → UMST-G arrives at exactly the same values, including the 0.67–0.73 frequency ratio.</b><b>✅ Copied methodology → Uses Prony spectral decomposition, Bayesian analysis (Bayes factor &gt; 800), and the same observational data.</b><b>VERDICT: Concealed Plagiarism, Mark Serdtse has not independently developed a new model; he has restructured ∆ngular Theory 0.0 while changing terminology.</b><br><br><b>INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & COPYRIGHT NOTICE</b><br>This research is protected under Figshare & Zenodo DOI registrations, ensuring official authorship and precedence.DOI – ∆ngular Theory 0.0 10.6084/m9.figshare.28489679 10.5281/zenodo.15021677 10.5281/zenodo.15027052<br>David Souday, 2025. All rights reserved. This document and its content are legally protected under copyright law, with certified timestamping and deposition by a legal authority. Official Timestamping Information: ➤ Public Key Number: 2D:49:50:31:53:7E:BD➤ Timestamping Server: NTP4 Soft NTS-100i GPS ➤ Signature Algorithm: SHA2 (Base 64) ➤ Digital Fingerprint Hash Algorithm: MD5 ➤ Certified Deposition Date: 25/02/2025 13:44:54 UTC ➤ Certified Bailiff Office: SPE SAS FRADIN TRONEL SASSARD & ASSOCIES 79 bis cours Vitton 69006 LYON ➤ File Name: Angular_Theory.docx ➤ Timestamp Number: FR1427612 ➤ Hash Signature: f00388d84b8fb53511f093fad048d405 ➤ Timestamp Status: VALID ------------------------------------------------------------ FIGSHARE PLAGIARISM REPORT FILED ------------------------------------------------------------ <b>Mark Serdtse, your false work has been officially reported for plagiarism. </b>The scientific community has been informed. Link to the official Figshare report: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_NOTICE_TO_PLAGIARISTS_THE_ORIGINAL_IS_ALWAYS_VISIBLE/28612760?file=53057588 Your actions are now permanently documented. Plagiarism is not innovation. Cite your sources<br><b>Mark Serdtse: If you genuinely seek to contribute to physics rather than repackaging pre-existing ideas, it is time to act transparently and properly cite your sources.</b><b><i>N.B : A friendly reminder Dear Mark, no need to strain yourself. You can dance around the concepts, change the terminology, or even ask an AI to rephrase, but without Delta (∆), everything will eventually collapse. </i></b><b><i>The universe has its own locks, and this one only opens with the right key. </i></b><b><i>Good luck</i></b><br><i>souday.david.research@gmail.com</i>