cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15139343
title: Table 1 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910

description: Table 1. Comparison of the original description of all previously described nominal species of Lophiomus Gill, 1883.
Lophius setigerus Vahl, 1797Lophius viviparus Bloch & Schneider, 1801Lophius indicus Alock, 1889Lophiomus longicephalus Tanaka, 1918Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910Chirolophius malabaricus Samuel, 1963Type localityChinaNot described8 km (5 miles) south of Ganjam, IndiaKiinokuni, Tanabe, Japan (current Tanabe-shi, Wakayama Prefecture, Japan)58 km northeast of Cape Moreton, Queensland, Australia 27°10′ S, 153°17′ EKerala coast, southwest IndiaDepthNot providedNot provided51.2 m (28 fathoms)Not provided133.5 m (73 fathoms)182.8 m (100 fathoms)Body colorNot describedNot describedDark grayNot described“Pale lilaceous brown”BrownPeritoneum colorNot describedNot describedPaleNot describedWhitePaleFloor of mouth patternBlack mouth with white spotsBlack mouth with white spotsNot describedBlack with large white spots, forming black reticulated pattern“…with blackish anastomosing lines”Not describedDorsal-fin spines4?Not described6666Dorsal-fin rays558999Anal-fin rays556–7777Pectoral-fin rays10 “… decem-radiatae ”Not described23Not described2324Pelvic-fin raysNot described55Not described75
description: Published as part of Chen, Hsuan-Pu, Lee, Mao-Ying & Chen, Wei-Jen, 2024, Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910, pp. 244 in European Journal of Taxonomy 943 on page 244, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2024.943.2599, http://zenodo.org/record/12806098
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15139344
title: Table 1 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910

description: Table 1. Comparison of the original description of all previously described nominal species of Lophiomus Gill, 1883.
Lophius setigerus Vahl, 1797Lophius viviparus Bloch & Schneider, 1801Lophius indicus Alock, 1889Lophiomus longicephalus Tanaka, 1918Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910Chirolophius malabaricus Samuel, 1963Type localityChinaNot described8 km (5 miles) south of Ganjam, IndiaKiinokuni, Tanabe, Japan (current Tanabe-shi, Wakayama Prefecture, Japan)58 km northeast of Cape Moreton, Queensland, Australia 27°10′ S, 153°17′ EKerala coast, southwest IndiaDepthNot providedNot provided51.2 m (28 fathoms)Not provided133.5 m (73 fathoms)182.8 m (100 fathoms)Body colorNot describedNot describedDark grayNot described“Pale lilaceous brown”BrownPeritoneum colorNot describedNot describedPaleNot describedWhitePaleFloor of mouth patternBlack mouth with white spotsBlack mouth with white spotsNot describedBlack with large white spots, forming black reticulated pattern“…with blackish anastomosing lines”Not describedDorsal-fin spines4?Not described6666Dorsal-fin rays558999Anal-fin rays556–7777Pectoral-fin rays10 “… decem-radiatae ”Not described23Not described2324Pelvic-fin raysNot described55Not described75
description: Published as part of Chen, Hsuan-Pu, Lee, Mao-Ying & Chen, Wei-Jen, 2024, Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910, pp. 244 in European Journal of Taxonomy 943 on page 244, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2024.943.2599, http://zenodo.org/record/12806098
DOI: 10.15468/dl.2f6zy2
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 440 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "TaxonKey is Vachellia kirkii (Oliv.) Kyal. & Boatwr.",
 "Continent is Africa"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 440 records from 39 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0005874-250402121839773/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15139345
title: Table 2 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910

description: Table 2. Summarized details for each aligned molecular dataset, including average length of unaligned sequences, length of the aligned dataset, number of variable and parsimony-informative sites, and GC content. Abbreviations: MT = concatenated COI + cytb dataset; NU = concatenated RAG1 + rhodopsin dataset; Pars-Inf = parsimony-informative sites; TC = concatenated MT+NU dataset.
Number of sequencesAverage lengthAligned lengthVariable sitesPars-Inf sitesGC (%)COI44627.066323320249.3cytb241119.1114346036548.0MT481134.4180669356848.7rhodopsin18826.9900996954.9RAG1151436.514401488350.7NU182023.9234024715252.4TC183653.4414692669650.6
description: Published as part of Chen, Hsuan-Pu, Lee, Mao-Ying & Chen, Wei-Jen, 2024, Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910, pp. 246 in European Journal of Taxonomy 943 on page 246, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2024.943.2599, http://zenodo.org/record/12806098
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15139346
title: Table 2 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910

description: Table 2. Summarized details for each aligned molecular dataset, including average length of unaligned sequences, length of the aligned dataset, number of variable and parsimony-informative sites, and GC content. Abbreviations: MT = concatenated COI + cytb dataset; NU = concatenated RAG1 + rhodopsin dataset; Pars-Inf = parsimony-informative sites; TC = concatenated MT+NU dataset.
Number of sequencesAverage lengthAligned lengthVariable sitesPars-Inf sitesGC (%)COI44627.066323320249.3cytb241119.1114346036548.0MT481134.4180669356848.7rhodopsin18826.9900996954.9RAG1151436.514401488350.7NU182023.9234024715252.4TC183653.4414692669650.6
description: Published as part of Chen, Hsuan-Pu, Lee, Mao-Ying & Chen, Wei-Jen, 2024, Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910, pp. 246 in European Journal of Taxonomy 943 on page 246, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2024.943.2599, http://zenodo.org/record/12806098
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15139347
title: Table 3 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910

description: Table 3. Standard length and the measurements expressed in percent (%) of standard length of species of Lophiomus Gill, 1883 described in this study. Values are expressed as ranges; values in parentheses are means ± standard deviations. Definitions and measurement abbreviations follow Caruso (1981). Abbreviations: HT = Holotype; N/A = unavailable; NT = neotype; ST = syntypes.
Lm. laticeps stat. rev.Lm. nigriventris sp. nov.Lm. immaculioralis sp. nov.Lm. carusoi sp. nov.Lm. setigerusLp. indicusSpeciesHTadults n = 3HTadults n = 6subadult n = 1HTHTadults n = 4NTthis study n = 18(Caruso 1983) n = 41ST (subadults) n = 2SL (mm)145.1145.1–237.1 (178.3 ± 51.0)193.2147.4–220.8 (188.0 ± 23.6)34.8243.0263.5121.0–292.5 (228.0 ± 75.1)155.069.3–284.3 (174.6 ± 65.8)70.0–277.035.3–66.4HL39.934.2–39.9 (36.2 ± 0.03)31.728.8–33.3 (30.9 ± 0.02)24.131.932.728.4–32.7 (29.8 ± 0.02)28.827.3–36.7 (32.1 ± 0.02)32.1–40.240.7–41.9TL56.545.4–56.5 (50.2 ± 0.06)50.347.0–50.3 (49.0 ± 0.01)49.446.051.547.4–51.5 (48.8 ± 0.02)48.338.6–55.4 (49.5 ± 0.05)31.5–39.055.1–56.9IL23.323.3–31.3 (226.5 ± 0.04)29.016.5–29.0 (23.6 ± 0.04)23.930.733.724.6–33.7 (27.9 ± 0.04)23.421.4–32.7 (26.2 ± 0.03)23.3–41.720.7–23.9DS217.417.4–25.5 (22.0 ± 0.04)20.717.9–20.7 (19.5 ± 0.01)23.018.322.019.7–23.1 (21.9 ± 0.02)17.315.0–25.7 (18.7 ± 0.03)13.2–20.826.6–27.6DS327.327.3–33.7 (31.0 ± 0.03)21.818.9–24.0 (21.2 ± 0.02)34.523.519.319.3–28.9 (23.8 ± 0.04)21.216.3–25.5 (21.8 ± 0.02)13.5–25.369.2 (n = 1)DS4N/A20.5–26.0 (n = 2)17.08.4–17.3 (14.7 ± 0.04)26.119.716.716.7–24.0 (19.5 ± 0.03)18.312.0–25.1 (19.0 ± 0.03)N/AN/A
description: Published as part of Chen, Hsuan-Pu, Lee, Mao-Ying & Chen, Wei-Jen, 2024, Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910, pp. 251 in European Journal of Taxonomy 943 on page 251, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2024.943.2599, http://zenodo.org/record/12806098
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15139348
title: Table 3 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910

description: Table 3. Standard length and the measurements expressed in percent (%) of standard length of species of Lophiomus Gill, 1883 described in this study. Values are expressed as ranges; values in parentheses are means ± standard deviations. Definitions and measurement abbreviations follow Caruso (1981). Abbreviations: HT = Holotype; N/A = unavailable; NT = neotype; ST = syntypes.
Lm. laticeps stat. rev.Lm. nigriventris sp. nov.Lm. immaculioralis sp. nov.Lm. carusoi sp. nov.Lm. setigerusLp. indicusSpeciesHTadults n = 3HTadults n = 6subadult n = 1HTHTadults n = 4NTthis study n = 18(Caruso 1983) n = 41ST (subadults) n = 2SL (mm)145.1145.1–237.1 (178.3 ± 51.0)193.2147.4–220.8 (188.0 ± 23.6)34.8243.0263.5121.0–292.5 (228.0 ± 75.1)155.069.3–284.3 (174.6 ± 65.8)70.0–277.035.3–66.4HL39.934.2–39.9 (36.2 ± 0.03)31.728.8–33.3 (30.9 ± 0.02)24.131.932.728.4–32.7 (29.8 ± 0.02)28.827.3–36.7 (32.1 ± 0.02)32.1–40.240.7–41.9TL56.545.4–56.5 (50.2 ± 0.06)50.347.0–50.3 (49.0 ± 0.01)49.446.051.547.4–51.5 (48.8 ± 0.02)48.338.6–55.4 (49.5 ± 0.05)31.5–39.055.1–56.9IL23.323.3–31.3 (226.5 ± 0.04)29.016.5–29.0 (23.6 ± 0.04)23.930.733.724.6–33.7 (27.9 ± 0.04)23.421.4–32.7 (26.2 ± 0.03)23.3–41.720.7–23.9DS217.417.4–25.5 (22.0 ± 0.04)20.717.9–20.7 (19.5 ± 0.01)23.018.322.019.7–23.1 (21.9 ± 0.02)17.315.0–25.7 (18.7 ± 0.03)13.2–20.826.6–27.6DS327.327.3–33.7 (31.0 ± 0.03)21.818.9–24.0 (21.2 ± 0.02)34.523.519.319.3–28.9 (23.8 ± 0.04)21.216.3–25.5 (21.8 ± 0.02)13.5–25.369.2 (n = 1)DS4N/A20.5–26.0 (n = 2)17.08.4–17.3 (14.7 ± 0.04)26.119.716.716.7–24.0 (19.5 ± 0.03)18.312.0–25.1 (19.0 ± 0.03)N/AN/A
description: Published as part of Chen, Hsuan-Pu, Lee, Mao-Ying & Chen, Wei-Jen, 2024, Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910, pp. 251 in European Journal of Taxonomy 943 on page 251, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2024.943.2599, http://zenodo.org/record/12806098
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15139351
title: Table 4 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910

description: Table 4. Measurements expressed in percent (%) of head lengths of species of Lophiomus Gill, 1883 described in this study. Values are expressed as ranges; values in parentheses are means± standard deviations. Definitions and measurement abbreviations follow Caruso (1981). Abbreviations: HT = Holotype; N/A = unavailable; NT = neotype; ST = syntypes.
Lm. laticeps stat. rev.Lm. nigriventris sp. nov.Lm. immaculioralis sp. nov.Lm. carusoi sp. nov.Lm. setigerusLp. indicusSpeciesHTadults n = 3HTadults n = 6subadult n = 1HTHT(adults) n = 4NT(this study) n = 18(Caruso 1983) n = 41ST (subadults) n = 2HW54.150.7–54.3 (53.0 ± 0.02)56.452.8–62.0 (57.8 ± 0.03)81.054.958.158.1–68.6 (63.2 ± 0.04)51.737.4–59.2 (54.5 ± 0.05)52.2–58.457.7–61.5HD85.369.3–85.3 (76.1 ± 0.08)74.269.4–80.1 (73.8 ± 0.04)107.171.277.977.9–88.6 (82.0 ± 0.05)79.666.4–82.4 (72.7 ± 0.04)66.4–74.760.3–60.4SNL56.656.6–66.3 (62.4 ± 0.05)64.654.2–66.2 (62.9 ± 0.04)114.957.963.863.8–82.9 (71.4 ± 0.08)65.556.0–71.4 (61.4 ± 0.04)53.1–59.054.4–58.5SNW39.630.9–56.5 (42.3 ± 0.13)38.331.8–39.5 (35.8 ± 0.04)70.237.641.941.9–55.7 (48.9 ± 0.06)32.728.5–47.9 (38.6 ± 0.06)20.7–25.125.3–36.3ISP39.939.2–39.9 (39.6 ± 0.003)41.140.6–45.4 (43.1 ± 0.02)65.540.353.148.6–56.7 (52.3 ± 0.03)46.133.0–49.0 (41.2 ± 0.04)36.7–44.334.2–42.2IF32.831.9–35.9 (33.5 ± 0.02)37.235.9–37.4 (36.7 ± 0.01)41.732.735.335.3–55.8 (45.9 ± 0.09)35.630.9–41.1 (35.6 ± 0.03)31.5–38.421.3–31.1PTSP16.112.3–16.1 (14.3 ± 0.02)14.413.3–16.7 (14.9 ± 0.01)25.014.514.210.7–19.6 (15.8 ± 0.04)11.910.7–16.4 (13.5 ± 0.01)11.4–15.219.6–22.4QPAL51.651.6–63.6 (58.8 ± 0.06)68.765.5–74.1 (69.0 ± 0.03)101.264.764.064.0–82.9 (73.4 ± 0.09)72.347.3–76.2 (65.2 ± 0.07)62.3–72.060.5–70.7OPSOP31.631.6–47.4 (40.7 ± 0.08)50.247.3–53.6 (49.5 ± 0.02)58.322.255.555.5–65.7 (59.6 ± 0.04)57.046.1–60.0 (51.9 ± 0.03)47.8–54.035.6–49.3
description: Published as part of Chen, Hsuan-Pu, Lee, Mao-Ying & Chen, Wei-Jen, 2024, Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910, pp. 252 in European Journal of Taxonomy 943 on page 252, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2024.943.2599, http://zenodo.org/record/12806098
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15139352
title: Table 4 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910

description: Table 4. Measurements expressed in percent (%) of head lengths of species of Lophiomus Gill, 1883 described in this study. Values are expressed as ranges; values in parentheses are means± standard deviations. Definitions and measurement abbreviations follow Caruso (1981). Abbreviations: HT = Holotype; N/A = unavailable; NT = neotype; ST = syntypes.
Lm. laticeps stat. rev.Lm. nigriventris sp. nov.Lm. immaculioralis sp. nov.Lm. carusoi sp. nov.Lm. setigerusLp. indicusSpeciesHTadults n = 3HTadults n = 6subadult n = 1HTHT(adults) n = 4NT(this study) n = 18(Caruso 1983) n = 41ST (subadults) n = 2HW54.150.7–54.3 (53.0 ± 0.02)56.452.8–62.0 (57.8 ± 0.03)81.054.958.158.1–68.6 (63.2 ± 0.04)51.737.4–59.2 (54.5 ± 0.05)52.2–58.457.7–61.5HD85.369.3–85.3 (76.1 ± 0.08)74.269.4–80.1 (73.8 ± 0.04)107.171.277.977.9–88.6 (82.0 ± 0.05)79.666.4–82.4 (72.7 ± 0.04)66.4–74.760.3–60.4SNL56.656.6–66.3 (62.4 ± 0.05)64.654.2–66.2 (62.9 ± 0.04)114.957.963.863.8–82.9 (71.4 ± 0.08)65.556.0–71.4 (61.4 ± 0.04)53.1–59.054.4–58.5SNW39.630.9–56.5 (42.3 ± 0.13)38.331.8–39.5 (35.8 ± 0.04)70.237.641.941.9–55.7 (48.9 ± 0.06)32.728.5–47.9 (38.6 ± 0.06)20.7–25.125.3–36.3ISP39.939.2–39.9 (39.6 ± 0.003)41.140.6–45.4 (43.1 ± 0.02)65.540.353.148.6–56.7 (52.3 ± 0.03)46.133.0–49.0 (41.2 ± 0.04)36.7–44.334.2–42.2IF32.831.9–35.9 (33.5 ± 0.02)37.235.9–37.4 (36.7 ± 0.01)41.732.735.335.3–55.8 (45.9 ± 0.09)35.630.9–41.1 (35.6 ± 0.03)31.5–38.421.3–31.1PTSP16.112.3–16.1 (14.3 ± 0.02)14.413.3–16.7 (14.9 ± 0.01)25.014.514.210.7–19.6 (15.8 ± 0.04)11.910.7–16.4 (13.5 ± 0.01)11.4–15.219.6–22.4QPAL51.651.6–63.6 (58.8 ± 0.06)68.765.5–74.1 (69.0 ± 0.03)101.264.764.064.0–82.9 (73.4 ± 0.09)72.347.3–76.2 (65.2 ± 0.07)62.3–72.060.5–70.7OPSOP31.631.6–47.4 (40.7 ± 0.08)50.247.3–53.6 (49.5 ± 0.02)58.322.255.555.5–65.7 (59.6 ± 0.04)57.046.1–60.0 (51.9 ± 0.03)47.8–54.035.6–49.3
description: Published as part of Chen, Hsuan-Pu, Lee, Mao-Ying & Chen, Wei-Jen, 2024, Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910, pp. 252 in European Journal of Taxonomy 943 on page 252, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2024.943.2599, http://zenodo.org/record/12806098
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15139353
title: Table 5 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910

description: Table 5. Meristic counts of species of Lophiomus Gill, 1883 described in this study. Values are counted from both sides and expressed as ranges; values expressed in parentheses indicate counts from the right side. Abbreviations: HT = Holotype; N/A = unavailable; NT = neotype; ST = syntypes.
Lm. laticeps stat. rev.Lm. nigriventris sp. nov.Lm. immaculioralis sp. nov.Lm. carusoi sp. nov.Lm. setigerus (this study)Lm. setigerus (Caruso 1983)Lp. indicusSpeciesHTadults n = 3HTadults n = 7HTHTadults n = 4NTadults n = 18n = 41ST n = 2Dorsal-fin spines66665666666Dorsal-fin rays88888888888Anal-fin rays66666666666Pectoral-fin rays24 (24)24–25 (24–25)23 (24)23–24 (23–24)22 (21)23 (23)23–24 (23–24)22 (22)21–23 (21–23)21–2522 (23)Pelvic-fin rays7 (7)7 (7)6 (6)6 (6)7 (7)7 (7)7 (7)7 (7)6–7 (6–7)N/A7 (7)Vertebrae1818–1918181818181918–1918–1918Outermost row of premaxillary teethN/A15–18 (17–22)22 (21)17–21 (17–24)33 (35)22 (20)15–27 (12–22)25 (27)18–33 (27–33)6–18N/AInteropercular spines22222222222Branchiostegal rays555555555N/A5
description: Published as part of Chen, Hsuan-Pu, Lee, Mao-Ying & Chen, Wei-Jen, 2024, Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910, pp. 253 in European Journal of Taxonomy 943 on page 253, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2024.943.2599, http://zenodo.org/record/12806098
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15139354
title: Table 5 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910

description: Table 5. Meristic counts of species of Lophiomus Gill, 1883 described in this study. Values are counted from both sides and expressed as ranges; values expressed in parentheses indicate counts from the right side. Abbreviations: HT = Holotype; N/A = unavailable; NT = neotype; ST = syntypes.
Lm. laticeps stat. rev.Lm. nigriventris sp. nov.Lm. immaculioralis sp. nov.Lm. carusoi sp. nov.Lm. setigerus (this study)Lm. setigerus (Caruso 1983)Lp. indicusSpeciesHTadults n = 3HTadults n = 7HTHTadults n = 4NTadults n = 18n = 41ST n = 2Dorsal-fin spines66665666666Dorsal-fin rays88888888888Anal-fin rays66666666666Pectoral-fin rays24 (24)24–25 (24–25)23 (24)23–24 (23–24)22 (21)23 (23)23–24 (23–24)22 (22)21–23 (21–23)21–2522 (23)Pelvic-fin rays7 (7)7 (7)6 (6)6 (6)7 (7)7 (7)7 (7)7 (7)6–7 (6–7)N/A7 (7)Vertebrae1818–1918181818181918–1918–1918Outermost row of premaxillary teethN/A15–18 (17–22)22 (21)17–21 (17–24)33 (35)22 (20)15–27 (12–22)25 (27)18–33 (27–33)6–18N/AInteropercular spines22222222222Branchiostegal rays555555555N/A5
description: Published as part of Chen, Hsuan-Pu, Lee, Mao-Ying & Chen, Wei-Jen, 2024, Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910, pp. 253 in European Journal of Taxonomy 943 on page 253, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2024.943.2599, http://zenodo.org/record/12806098
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15139355
title: Table 6 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910

description: Table 6. Frequency distribution of left (upper row) and right (lower row) pectoral-fin rays and vertebrae meristic counts of species of Lophiomus Gill, 1883 described in this study. The star mark indicates the count of the name-bearing type. Abbreviations: Mean = arithmetic mean of meristic counts; N = number of examined specimens.
Pectoral-fin raysVertebraeNMean212223242526NMean181920Lm. setigerus13 1322.1 21.91 210* 10*2 1418.2531*Lm. laticeps stat. rev.3 324.3 24.32* 2*1 1318.32*1Lm. nigriventris sp. nov.7 723.3 23.35* 52 2*6186*Lm. carusoi sp. nov.4 423.3 23.33* 3*1 12182*Lm. immaculioralis sp. nov.1 122 211*1*1181*Lp. indicus1 223 222*1*2182*
description: Published as part of Chen, Hsuan-Pu, Lee, Mao-Ying & Chen, Wei-Jen, 2024, Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910, pp. 254 in European Journal of Taxonomy 943 on page 254, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2024.943.2599, http://zenodo.org/record/12806098
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15139356
title: Table 6 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910

description: Table 6. Frequency distribution of left (upper row) and right (lower row) pectoral-fin rays and vertebrae meristic counts of species of Lophiomus Gill, 1883 described in this study. The star mark indicates the count of the name-bearing type. Abbreviations: Mean = arithmetic mean of meristic counts; N = number of examined specimens.
Pectoral-fin raysVertebraeNMean212223242526NMean181920Lm. setigerus13 1322.1 21.91 210* 10*2 1418.2531*Lm. laticeps stat. rev.3 324.3 24.32* 2*1 1318.32*1Lm. nigriventris sp. nov.7 723.3 23.35* 52 2*6186*Lm. carusoi sp. nov.4 423.3 23.33* 3*1 12182*Lm. immaculioralis sp. nov.1 122 211*1*1181*Lp. indicus1 223 222*1*2182*
description: Published as part of Chen, Hsuan-Pu, Lee, Mao-Ying & Chen, Wei-Jen, 2024, Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910, pp. 254 in European Journal of Taxonomy 943 on page 254, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2024.943.2599, http://zenodo.org/record/12806098