cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-8967-1
title: Surrey Communication and Language in Education Study: Screening Data, 2012
title: SCALES

description: &lt;p class="x_x_MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;span lang="EN-US"&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Surrey Communication and Language in Education Study&lt;/span&gt; (SCALES) is the first UK population study of language development and disorder at school entry. The study is funded by Wellcome and the ESRC and involves more than 180 schools across Surrey UK.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This longitudinal study was initially established to determine (1) the extent to which 'Specific' Language Impairment (SLI) was prevalent in a population (as opposed to clinically ascertained) sample at school entry, and (2) the impact of language impairment on other aspects of development and how these patterns of development change over time.  A second phase of SCALES aimed to test theoretical accounts of the developing relationship between language and social, emotional, and mental health during the transition to secondary school. Unfortunately, the final testing wave coincided with the global Covid-19 pandemic which impacted data collection due to school closures and lockdown.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Surrey Communication and Language in Education Study: Screening Data, 2012&lt;/span&gt; contains anonymised data from the first phase of the SCALES study. In this phase, Reception class teachers in state-maintained schools in the county of Surrey UK were invited to respond to an on-line questionnaire for each child in their class. The main focus of the study was to identify the prevalence of language difficulties at school entry and document the association between language difficulties, behavioural problems and educational attainment in the first year of school. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Further information about the study can be found on the UCL Literacy, Language and Communication Laboratory &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lilac-lab.org/scales/" target="_blank"&gt;SCALES&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span lang="EN-US"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lilac-lab.org/scales/" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/a&gt; project website.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-8968-1
title: Surrey Communication and Language in Education Study: Intensive Data T2-T5, 2012-2020
title: SCALES

description: &lt;p class="x_x_MsoNormal"&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Surrey Communication and Language in Education Study&lt;/span&gt; (SCALES) is the first UK population study of language development and disorder at school entry. The study is funded by Wellcome and the ESRC and involves more than 180 schools across Surrey UK. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This longitudinal study was initially established to determine (1) the extent to which 'Specific' Language Impairment (SLI) was prevalent in a population (as opposed to clinically ascertained) sample at school entry, and (2) the impact of language impairment on other aspects of development and how these patterns of development change over time.  A second phase of SCALES aimed to test theoretical accounts of the developing relationship between language and social, emotional, and mental health during the transition to secondary school. Unfortunately, the final testing wave coincided with the global Covid-19 pandemic which impacted data collection due to school closures and lockdown.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Surrey Communication and Language in Education Study: Intensive Data T2-T5, 2012-2020&lt;/span&gt; concerns the intensive cohort who were assessed at four time points: Year 1, Year 3, Year 6, and Year 8. The dataset includes 528 variables assessing language, literacy, cognition, executive function and social, emotional and behavioural well-being. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;span lang="EN-US"&gt;Further information about the study can be found on the UCL Literacy, Language and Communication Laboratory &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lilac-lab.org/scales/" target="_blank" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"&gt;SCALES&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span lang="EN-US"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lilac-lab.org/scales/" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;/a&gt; project website.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-8969-1
title: Cyber Security Longitudinal Survey: Wave 1, 2021
title: Cyber Security Longitudinal Surveys, 2021-
title: CSLS

description: &lt;p&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Cyber Security Longitudinal Survey&lt;/span&gt; (CSLS) aims to better understand cyber security policies and processes within medium and large businesses and high-income charities. It explores cyber security policies and processes over time and the likelihood and impact of a cyber incident.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Cyber Security Longitudinal Survey: Wave 1, 2021&lt;/span&gt; is the first research year of a three-year study. The main objective of this dataset is to establish a baseline of findings. This research is part of the government's £2.6 billion National Cyber Strategy 2022 to protect and promote the UK in cyber space. It also informs the government's work to improve the cyber resilience of organisations across the UK economy.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Further information and additional publications can be found on the &lt;a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/cyber-security-longitudinal-survey" target="_blank"&gt;GOV.UK Cyber Security Longitudinal Survey&lt;/a&gt; webpage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-8970-1
title: Cyber Security Breaches Survey, 2022
title: Cyber Security Breaches Surveys, 2018-
title: CSBS

description: &lt;p&gt;The &lt;em&gt;Cyber Security Breaches Survey, 2022&lt;/em&gt; (CSBS) was run to understand organisations' approaches and attitudes to cyber security, and to understand their experience of cyber security breaches. The aim of the survey was to support the Government by providing evidence that can inform policies which help to make Britain a safer place to do business online. Details of changes for the 2022 survey can be found in the Technical Annex documentation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;These surveys have been conducted annually since 2016 to understand the views of UK organisations on cyber security. Data are collected on topics including online use; attitudes of organisations to cyber security and awareness of Government initiatives; approaches to cyber security (including investment and processes); incidences and impact of a cyber security breach or attack; and how breaches are dealt with by the organisation. This information helps to inform Government policy towards organisations, including how best to target key messages to businesses and charities so that they are cyber secure (and so that the UK is the safest place in the world to do business online). The study is funded by the DCMS as part of the National Cyber Security Programme. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The underlying data are useful for researchers to better understand the response across a range of organisations and for wider comparability over time. The survey originally only covered businesses but was expanded to include charities from the 2018 survey onwards. From 2020, the survey includes a sample of education institutions (primary and secondary schools, further and higher education). Please note that the UK Data Service only holds data from 2018 onwards.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Further information and additional publications can be found on the &lt;a href="http://gov.uk/" target="_blank"&gt;GOV.UK&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/cyber-security-breaches-survey-2022"&gt;Cyber Security Breaches Survey, 2022&lt;/a&gt; webpage.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/vfi8cm
title: msXV_128r_15_01.jpg
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-8972-1
title: Seas, Oceans and Public Health in Europe (SOPHIE) Citizen Survey, 2019

description: &lt;p&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Seas, Oceans and Public Health in Europe &lt;/span&gt;(SOPHIE) was a pan-European project which aimed to protect both human health and the health of the marine environment. It was funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 programme under grant agreement No 774567 to help establish new research capacity for the emerging scientific discipline of Oceans and Human Health. SOPHIE brought together different communities (i.e. marine, medical and social scientists; public health and other experts) and created a platform for these communities to work together to understand the complex interactions between the marine environment and human health and wellbeing. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This study comprises of the anoymised data from the &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;SOPHIE Citizen Survey&lt;/span&gt;. The data were collected from nationally representative samples (based on age, gender and region) of adults from 14 European countries in March and April 2019 by the online market research company YouGov. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The survey itself had four sections: i) exposure to the marine environment (e.g. distance living from coast (km), frequency of coastal visits, marine employment and recreation); ii) perceptions of maritime activities (e.g. economic, environmental and health attitudes); iii) concerns, funding and policy preferences (e.g. future funding topics and preferences for health policies) and iv) socio-demographics (e.g. age, gender, education, occupation and income). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The researchers request that anybody who uses this data acknowledges this in any outputs they use in the following way: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Acknowledge this data deposit &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Acknowledge the funding source using the following text: "The Seas, Oceans and Public Health (SOPHIE) survey data was created using funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 774567."&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;Further information is available on the &lt;a href="https://sophie2020.eu/" target="_blank"&gt;SOPHIE&lt;/a&gt; project website.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-8974-1
title: Scottish House Condition Survey, 2012-2019
title: Scottish House Condition Survey, 1991-
title: SHCS

description:   &lt;p&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Scottish House Condition Survey&lt;/span&gt; (SHCS) is the largest single housing research project in Scotland, and the only national survey to look at the physical condition of Scotland's homes as well as the experiences of householders. The survey started in 1991 and became continuous in 2003-04. From 2012 onwards, the survey was incorporated within the &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Scottish Household Survey&lt;/span&gt; (available from the UK Data Archive under GN 33333) and became one of its modules. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The SHCS consists of an interview with householders and a physical inspection of the dwelling they occupy, which provides a picture of Scotland's occupied housing stock. It covers all types of households and dwellings across the country - whether owned or rented, flats or houses. The physical data about the dwelling is recorded by surveyors trained to collect detailed information on housing characteristics. This is combined with information about the household collected through the face to face interview. The result is a unique and powerful dataset for examining the condition and characteristics of Scotland's housing stock alongside the views and experience of the people living in those dwellings. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Further information about the survey series, and links to publications, can be found on the Scottish Government's &lt;a href="https://www.gov.scot/collections/scottish-house-condition-survey/" target="_blank"&gt;Scottish House Condition Survey&lt;/a&gt; webpages.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-8976-1
title: Household Survey for Evaluation of Nepal Resilience Project, 2016
title: Effectiveness Review
title: Effectiveness Review Series

description: &lt;p&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Household Survey for Evaluation of Nepal Resilience Project, 2016&lt;/span&gt; data were collected by Oxfam for an Effectiveness Review of the 'Joint Programme on Disaster Risk Management and Humanitarian Preparedness' project in the 2015/16 financial year. It should be noted that this project was active between April 2011 and March 2016. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The project aimed to build the resilience of project participants to a number of different shocks and stresses. Households' livelihoods in the region are typically based around agricultural activities, which are threatened by floods, droughts, outbreaks of human and animal diseases, and spells of especially cold weather. The project worked at a number of different levels to reduce households' vulnerability to these risks. Within communities, a programme of training and support was provided to enhance the activities of local disaster management committees and women's empowerment groups (WEGs). Improved Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) facilities were also constructed, as well as small-scale flood mitigation structures, such as embankments, culverts, and dams. The project also supported district- and national-level institutions to help create disaster management plans, which should have a wider impact on resilience. Furthermore, the project undertook some advocacy activities to try and change national policies related to disaster management. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Data collection took place in January 2016 in four districts in the Terai region of southern Nepal - Dhanusha, Rautahat, Salarhi, and Saptari. The intervention group consisted of a randomly selected sample of project households from eight Village Development Committees (VDCs) - which are similar to municipalities - using household lists based on lists of WEG members. The comparison group consisted of a randomly selected sample of households from 12 non-project VDCs that were similar to the project communities in terms of a number of key characteristics, including the dominant livelihood strategies employed by community members, the distance of the community from large rivers, and the ethnic composition of the community.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-8977-1
title: Individual Survey for Evaluation of Mali Women's Empowerment Project, 2016
title: Effectiveness Review
title: Effectiveness Review Series

description: &lt;p class="x_x_MsoNormal"&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Individual Survey for Evaluation of Mali Women's Empowerment Project, 2016&lt;/span&gt; data were collected by Oxfam for an Effectiveness Review of the 'Girls CAN - Promoting secondary education for girls in West Africa' project in the 2015/16 financial year. It should be noted that this project was active between 2011 and 2015. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The project aimed to increase school retention and transition of adolescent girls from primary to secondary school. This was achieved by rolling out a variety of activities to support change from within the community. It was, therefore, aimed not only at girls, but also at all community members involved in the project (e.g., mothers, school directors and religious figures). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Data collection took place in January 2016 in Koulikoro region (Kati circle). The intervention group consisted of a randomly selected sample of adolescent girls who were enrolled in schools that participated in Oxfam's Girls CAN project in 2011. The comparison group consisted of a randomly selected sample of girls who were enrolled in a number of other comparable schools within the region in 2011.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-8978-1
title: Household Survey for Evaluation of Ethiopia and Somaliland Resilience Project, 2015
title: Effectiveness Review
title: Effectiveness Review Series

description: &lt;p&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Household Survey for Evaluation of Ethiopia and Somaliland Resilience Project, 2015 &lt;/span&gt;data were collected by Oxfam for an Effectiveness Review of the 'Contributing to the Development of Enabling Conditions for Human Security for Vulnerable Pastoralist and Agro-Pastoralist Communities' project in the 2015/16 financial year. It should be noted that this project was active between July 2012 and June 2016. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The project aimed to build the resilience of project participants to drought, conflict, and other shocks and stresses, through a series of activities working at different scales. The project worked directly to improve pastoralists' and agro-pastoralists' ability to thrive in spite of drought and conflict by rehabilitating sources of water and grazing land and by managing livestock disease. The project also promoted alternative income-generating activities among women and the youth by providing training and supporting savings/credit groups. Finally, the project tried to increase the voice and representation of marginalised groups in key decision-making forums. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Data collection took place in November 2015 in the Somali region of Ethiopia and Somaliland. The intervention (beneficiary) group consisted of a randomly selected sample of households from project communities in two woredas in Ethiopia and one region in Somaliland. The comparison (non-beneficiary) group consisted of a randomly selected sample of households from communities similar to the project communities in terms of a number of key characteristics, including the dominant livelihood strategies employed by community members, the distance of the community from main roads, and the distance of the community from the Ethiopia-Somaliland border.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/rfpgh1
title: msXV_128r_0_ring.jpg
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-8979-1
title: Household Survey for Evaluation of Democratic Republic of Congo Livelihoods Project, 2015
title: Effectiveness Review
title: Effectiveness Review Series

description: &lt;p&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Household Survey for Evaluation of Democratic Republic of Congo Livelihoods Project, 2015&lt;/span&gt; data were collected by Oxfam for an Effectiveness Review of the 'Purchase for Progress (P4P) in DRC' project in the 2015/16 financial year. It should be noted that this project was active between April 2012 and October 2014. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The project aimed to increase the quality and quantity of produce, improve the condition of transport and storage, and promote women's participation through the development of sustainable livelihoods opportunities and better income. Activities focused on increasing production, sales and revenues from maize, rice, groundnuts and beans by providing the necessary inputs and technical advice on modern methods of farming and forming marketing groups for these commodities for increased sales. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Data collection took place in October 2015&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; display: inline !important; float: none;"&gt;&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;in Bikoro and Ingende&lt;/span&gt;, two municipalities of the Equateur Province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The intervention (beneficiary) group consisted of a randomly selected sample of farmer households from villages that had participated in the project. The comparison (non-beneficiary) group consisted of a randomly selected sample of farmer households from villages similar to the project villages that had not participated, but were eligible and interested in participating in the project.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-8980-1
title: Household Survey for Evaluation of Chad Resilience and Food Security Project, 2015
title: Effectiveness Review
title: Effectiveness Review Series

description: &lt;p&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Household Survey for Evaluation of Chad Resilience and Food Security Project, 2015&lt;/span&gt; data were collected by Oxfam for an Effectiveness Review of the 'Reinforcing Resilience Capacity in Bahr el Gazal' project in the 2014/15 financial year. It should be noted that this project was active between April 2011 and March 2014. This Effectiveness Review was later expanded to include the project 'Improving the Food Security Information System in Guera Region' (usually referred to by its French acronym, PASISAT), which was active between February 2011 and March 2014. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The main activities carried out by the project in Bahr el Gazal included the distribution of seeds and tools, training on agricultural techniques, training of community animal-health workers, restocking of sheep and goats, vaccination of livestock, and training on market gardening. The main objective of the project PASISAT in Guera was to strengthen the region's Food Security Information System by establishing processes under which data on meteorological conditions and crop production are collected regularly by officials within each canton, and submitted to a central coordinating office. The participants also benefited from support in market gardening; training on seed replication techniques, soil conservation and restoration work; and promotion of improved nutritional practices. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Data collection took place from January to February 2015 in Bahr el Gazal and Guera. The intervention group consisted of a random sample of project households in Bahar el Gazal that were assessed as being 'poor' or 'very poor' and a random sample of project households in Guera that had participated in the market gardening and seed-replication activities. The comparison group consisted of a randomly selected sample of households from communities located in the area, but where none of the project activities had been carried out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-8981-1
title: Household Survey for Evaluation of Bolivia Livelihoods Resilience Project, 2015
title: Effectiveness Review
title: Effectiveness Review Series

description: &lt;p&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Household Survey for Evaluation of Bolivia Livelihoods Resilience Project, 2015&lt;/span&gt; data were collected by Oxfam for an Effectiveness Review of the 'Supporting communities in Bolivia to adapt to changing weather patterns and improve their livelihoods' project in the 2014/15 financial year. It should be noted that this project was active between 2010 and 2013, while its predecessor was launched in 2008. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The key activities of this project, together with its predecessor, included constructing and promoting the use of camellones, an indigenous land-management system intended to protect livelihoods (agriculture and fish farming) against drought or flood, thereby increasing resilience. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Data collection took place in April 2015 around the regional capital of Trinidad in the Department of Beni. The intervention group consisted of all project households from three rural communities and one peri-urban area that could be identified and located. The comparison group consisted of a randomly selected sample of households from rural communities and peri-urban areas that were similar to the project communities in terms of a number of key characteristics, including the dominant livelihood strategies employed by community members, the distance of the community from large rivers, and the ethnic composition of the community.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;