cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.15468/dl.vzvbse
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 0 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 "BasisOfRecord is one of (Human Observation, Machine Observation, Occurrence evidence, Observation)",
 "TaxonKey is one of (Corvus capensis)",
 "Country is one of (Åland Islands, Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Faroe Islands, Finland, France, Germany, Gibraltar, Greece, Guernsey, Holy See, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Isle of Man, Italy, Jersey, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Moldova, Republic of, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Svalbard and Jan Mayen, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 0 records from 0 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0086104-250717081556266/datasets/export for details.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110827831
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2295.101, Fort 2295.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2295.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken bottom edge, right edge. Damaged left edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110827996
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 0831, PF 0831

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seal ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] PF 0831 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Damage on left edge, cracks and damage on obverse. Crack on right edge, upper edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110827953
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2295.101, Fort 2295.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2295.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken bottom edge, right edge. Damaged left edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110827800
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2295.101, Fort 2295.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2295.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken bottom edge, right edge. Damaged left edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110827789
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2295.101, Fort 2295.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2295.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken bottom edge, right edge. Damaged left edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110827948
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2295.101, Fort 2295.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2295.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken bottom edge, right edge. Damaged left edge.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.wwg2g8
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 36515 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "DatasetKey" : [
 "is Taxon occurrence data for the FungalRoot database"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 36515 records from 1 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0024375-251025141854904/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110827936
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2295.101, Fort 2295.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2295.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken bottom edge, right edge. Damaged left edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110827786
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2295.101, Fort 2295.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2295.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken bottom edge, right edge. Damaged left edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110827263
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2295.101, Fort 2295.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2295.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken bottom edge, right edge. Damaged left edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110831236
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1226, PF 1226

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] PF 1226 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Cracks on left edge, obverse, reverse.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110827259
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2295.101, Fort 2295.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2295.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken bottom edge, right edge. Damaged left edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110831207
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1226, PF 1226

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] PF 1226 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Cracks on left edge, obverse, reverse.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110827206
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2295.101, Fort 2295.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2295.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken bottom edge, right edge. Damaged left edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110831200
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1226, PF 1226

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] PF 1226 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Cracks on left edge, obverse, reverse.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110831188
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1226, PF 1226

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] PF 1226 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Cracks on left edge, obverse, reverse.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110827202
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2295.101, Fort 2295.101

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2295.101 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Broken bottom edge, right edge. Damaged left edge.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110827183
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 2293.105, Fort 2293.105

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seal ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] Fort 2293.105 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on upper edge? ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Upper section of tablet is broken off. Cracks on obverse, reverse.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110831186
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1226, PF 1226

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] PF 1226 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Cracks on left edge, obverse, reverse.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110831182
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1226, PF 1226

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] PF 1226 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Cracks on left edge, obverse, reverse.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110830605
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1226, PF 1226

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] PF 1226 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Cracks on left edge, obverse, reverse.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.30578412
title: Outcome measures for evaluating perceived upper limb performance after stroke: a systematic review of measurement properties

description: This study assessed Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for perceived upper‐extremity performance following stroke rehabilitation. A systematic review, adhering to COSMIN guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42024582486), identified PROMs through a primary search, followed by a secondary search for studies on measurement properties. Properties were evaluated using COSMIN criteria and Risk of Bias checklist. PROM items were mapped to International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Activity and Participation domains. Thirty‐five studies evaluating 17 PROMs were included. No PROM demonstrated high‐quality evidence across all measurement properties. The ABILHAND, Motor Activity Log (MAL)-28, MAL‐30, and Rasch‐Based MAL showed sufficient content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, and reliability. Across measurement properties, measurement error, cross‐cultural validity, and responsiveness are less explored. Most PROM items focused on mobility and self‐care, with fewer items addressing complex activities. This systematic review assessed 17 PROMs for perceived upper‐limb performance in stroke patients, identifying a need for improved methodological quality and measurement properties. The ABILHAND, MAL‐28, MAL‐30, and Rasch‐Based MAL showed sufficient content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, and reliability, but gaps remain in other measurement properties. High-quality, COSMIN-guided studies are required to strengthen evidence on measurement properties of PROM identified by this study. Clinicians and researchers can use these findings to choose PROMs and direct future research. Accurate assessment of perceived upper limb performance after a stroke is critical for guiding client-centred rehabilitation planning and tracking progress.These findings can help therapists and researchers in choosing the most suitable tools while also indicating areas that need further validation.Among the 17 Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) reviewed, the ABILHAND, Motor Activity Log (MAL-28 and MAL-30), and the Rasch-Based MAL have the strongest supporting evidence, especially regarding content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, and reliability. Accurate assessment of perceived upper limb performance after a stroke is critical for guiding client-centred rehabilitation planning and tracking progress. These findings can help therapists and researchers in choosing the most suitable tools while also indicating areas that need further validation. Among the 17 Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) reviewed, the ABILHAND, Motor Activity Log (MAL-28 and MAL-30), and the Rasch-Based MAL have the strongest supporting evidence, especially regarding content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, and reliability.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.30578412.v1
title: Outcome measures for evaluating perceived upper limb performance after stroke: a systematic review of measurement properties

description: This study assessed Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for perceived upper‐extremity performance following stroke rehabilitation. A systematic review, adhering to COSMIN guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42024582486), identified PROMs through a primary search, followed by a secondary search for studies on measurement properties. Properties were evaluated using COSMIN criteria and Risk of Bias checklist. PROM items were mapped to International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Activity and Participation domains. Thirty‐five studies evaluating 17 PROMs were included. No PROM demonstrated high‐quality evidence across all measurement properties. The ABILHAND, Motor Activity Log (MAL)-28, MAL‐30, and Rasch‐Based MAL showed sufficient content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, and reliability. Across measurement properties, measurement error, cross‐cultural validity, and responsiveness are less explored. Most PROM items focused on mobility and self‐care, with fewer items addressing complex activities. This systematic review assessed 17 PROMs for perceived upper‐limb performance in stroke patients, identifying a need for improved methodological quality and measurement properties. The ABILHAND, MAL‐28, MAL‐30, and Rasch‐Based MAL showed sufficient content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, and reliability, but gaps remain in other measurement properties. High-quality, COSMIN-guided studies are required to strengthen evidence on measurement properties of PROM identified by this study. Clinicians and researchers can use these findings to choose PROMs and direct future research. Accurate assessment of perceived upper limb performance after a stroke is critical for guiding client-centred rehabilitation planning and tracking progress.These findings can help therapists and researchers in choosing the most suitable tools while also indicating areas that need further validation.Among the 17 Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) reviewed, the ABILHAND, Motor Activity Log (MAL-28 and MAL-30), and the Rasch-Based MAL have the strongest supporting evidence, especially regarding content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, and reliability. Accurate assessment of perceived upper limb performance after a stroke is critical for guiding client-centred rehabilitation planning and tracking progress. These findings can help therapists and researchers in choosing the most suitable tools while also indicating areas that need further validation. Among the 17 Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) reviewed, the ABILHAND, Motor Activity Log (MAL-28 and MAL-30), and the Rasch-Based MAL have the strongest supporting evidence, especially regarding content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, and reliability.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110830602
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1226, PF 1226

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] PF 1226 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Cracks on left edge, obverse, reverse.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110831177
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1226, PF 1226

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] PF 1226 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Cracks on left edge, obverse, reverse.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/xb4baj
title: Replication Data for Policymaker Environmental Communication in the Wake of Natural Disasters

description: These CSVs contain the final datasets used in "Policymaker Environmental Communication in the Wake of Natural Disasters."
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110831172
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1226, PF 1226

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] PF 1226 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Cracks on left edge, obverse, reverse.
DOI: 10.25549/inscriptifact-ouc110830601
title: Persepolis Fortification Elamite Tablet 1226, PF 1226

description: [Text Description:] Administrative text with seals ❧ [Text or Publication Number Note:] PF 1226 ❧ [Excavation Description:] Found during Oriental Institute's excavations in Spring, 1933, near the northeastern corner of the stone platform of Persepolis, in two small rooms of a bastion in the fortification wall ❧ [Medium:] Clay ❧ [Script Note:] Non-Alphabetic Cuneiform ❧ [Physical Object Description:] Clay tablet with cuneiform text. Seal impression on left edge, reverse. ❧ [Physical Object Note:] Cracks on left edge, obverse, reverse.