cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.17632/dk49rfrz9y.1
title: Parallel finite-element codes for the simulation of two-dimensional and three-dimensional solid–liquid phase-change systems with natural convection

description: We present and distribute a FreeFem++ Toolbox for the parallel computing of two- or three-dimensional liquid–solid phase-change systems involving natural convection. FreeFem++ (www.freefem.org) is a free finite-element software available for all existing operating systems. We use the recent library ffddm that makes available in FreeFem++ state-of-the-art scalable Schwarz domain decomposition methods (DDM). The single domain approach used in our previous contribution (Rakotondrandisa et al., 2020) is adapted for the use of the DDM method. As a result, the computational time is considerably reduced for 2D configurations and furthermore 3D problems become affordable. The numerical method is based on an enthalpy-porosity model. The same set of equations is solved in both liquid and solid phases: the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations with Boussinesq approximation for thermal effects. A Carman-Kozeny-type penalty term is added to the momentum equations to bring progressively the velocity to zero into the solid. Model equations are discretized using Galerkin triangular or tetrahedral finite elements. The coupled system of equations is integrated in time using a second-order Gear implicit scheme. The resulting discrete equations are solved using a Newton algorithm. The DDM approach is based on an overlapping Schwarz method. The mesh is first split in subdomains using Scotch or Metis libraries. The final linear system is then solved in parallel using a GMRES Krylov method, with a Restricted Additive Schwarz (RAS) preconditioner. The mesh is adapted during the computation using metrics control. The 3D-mesh adaptivity uses the mmg (www.mmgtools.org) open source library. Parallel 2D and 3D computations of benchmark cases of increasing difficulty are presented: natural convection of air, natural convection of water, melting or solidification of a phase-change material, and, finally, a water freezing case. For each case, careful validations are provided and the performance of the code is assessed. The robustness of the Toolbox in 3D is also demonstrated by adapting the number of processors to the number of tetrahedra, which can considerably vary after the mesh adaptation.
DOI: 10.3886/e2841v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e3025v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e3192v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e3229v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e3265v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e4195v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.6072/h0.mp.a004265.01
title: Ficolin-1

description: Ficolin-1 is a member of the lectin family of proteins, which act as pattern recognition receptors in the innate immune system. Its overall structure resembles other lectins such as L- and H-Ficolin and MBL. The ~35kDa polypeptide has an amino (N)-terminal cysteine-rich region, a middle stretch of a collagen-like sequence, and a fibrinogen-like domain in the carboxy (C)-terminus. Three identical polypeptides form a structural (triple helical) subunit, with the help of the collagen-like domain. Further oligomerization of this subunit results in the tetrameric functional form (composed of 12 polypeptides). The polypeptides in the structural subunit are cross-linked by disulphide bonds in the N-terminal region. The fibrinogen-like domain forms a globular structure. Ficolin-1 recognizes specific acetylated sugars on pathogen surfaces. Unlike other ficolins and MBL, which are synthesized by the liver and found in serum, ficolin-1 is mainly synthesized by monocytes and neutrophils, and exhibit surface or granular expression along with presence in serum. Further, ficolin-1 also recognizes sialic acid, a component found in host cell membranes, as a ligand. These characteristics attribute distinct functions to ficolin-1 in regulation of immune response.
DOI: 10.3886/e3116v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e3274v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e3310v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e3373v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e3391v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e3255v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e3400v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.6073/pasta/9ebf971e41250e54c3bf1d1e4d35f0d2
title: Landscape Age Map for Hog Island, Northampton, Co., Virginia. 1852-1985
DOI: 10.3886/e3409v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e3519v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e3455v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e3528v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e3483v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e3609v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e3618v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e3636v3
title: Labor Market Returns to an Early Childhood Stimulation Intervention in Jamaica

description: In 1986-1987, the Jamaican Study enrolled 129 growth stunted and disadvantaged children aged 9-24 months that lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Half of the children were randomized into a cognitive stimulation intervention which lasted 18 months (S. P.Walker, S. M. Chang, C. A. Powell, S. M. Grantham-McGregor, The Lancet 366, 1804 (2005)). A matched non-stunted group was also followed for comparison purposes. We resurveyed both the stunted and non-stunted samples in 2007-08, some 20 years after the original intervention, when the participants were approximately 22 years old. We found and interviewed 105 out of the original 129 stunted study participants. We estimated the impact of the stimulation intervention on earnings by comparing the earnings of the stunted-treatment group to those of the stunted-comparison group.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>