cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564645
title: Appendix A. A table showing rangesof simulated GPP/NEP in one-year, two-year, and three-year calibration experiments, and figures showin a summary of calculated “ClimVar” for one-year, two-year, and three-year calibration experiments, including deciduous broadleaf forest, coniferous forest, grassland, shrubland and boreal forest and spatial pattern of U.S. NEP, averaged over 2000–2008.

description: A table showing rangesof simulated GPP/NEP in one-year, two-year, and three-year calibration experiments, and figures showin a summary of calculated “ClimVar” for one-year, two-year, and three-year calibration experiments, including deciduous broadleaf forest, coniferous forest, grassland, shrubland and boreal forest and spatial pattern of U.S. NEP, averaged over 2000–2008.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564645.v1
title: Appendix A. A table showing rangesof simulated GPP/NEP in one-year, two-year, and three-year calibration experiments, and figures showin a summary of calculated “ClimVar” for one-year, two-year, and three-year calibration experiments, including deciduous broadleaf forest, coniferous forest, grassland, shrubland and boreal forest and spatial pattern of U.S. NEP, averaged over 2000–2008.

description: A table showing rangesof simulated GPP/NEP in one-year, two-year, and three-year calibration experiments, and figures showin a summary of calculated “ClimVar” for one-year, two-year, and three-year calibration experiments, including deciduous broadleaf forest, coniferous forest, grassland, shrubland and boreal forest and spatial pattern of U.S. NEP, averaged over 2000–2008.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564642
title: Appendix A. A complete listing of species found in the anthropogenic peatland using the nomenclature of the Instituto de Botánica Darwinion (www.darwin.edu.ar).

description: A complete listing of species found in the anthropogenic peatland using the nomenclature of the Instituto de Botánica Darwinion (www.darwin.edu.ar).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564639
title: Appendix A. Bayesian removal model.

description: Bayesian removal model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564639.v1
title: Appendix A. Bayesian removal model.

description: Bayesian removal model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564636
title: Supplement 1. OpenBUGS code for Bayesian removal model.

description: File List removal_model_code.odc (MD5: b775efcc0e833f2a6b5be0483e9c8dcf) Description The OpenBUGs code, Removal model code.odc, estimates fish densities based on stream reach size and catches during three consecutive removal passes of the same stream reach.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564636.v1
title: Supplement 1. OpenBUGS code for Bayesian removal model.

description: File List removal_model_code.odc (MD5: b775efcc0e833f2a6b5be0483e9c8dcf) Description The OpenBUGs code, Removal model code.odc, estimates fish densities based on stream reach size and catches during three consecutive removal passes of the same stream reach.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564633
title: Appendix A. Relationship between structural and temporal forest variables and beetle community structure (untransformed data).

description: Relationship between structural and temporal forest variables and beetle community structure (untransformed data).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564633.v1
title: Appendix A. Relationship between structural and temporal forest variables and beetle community structure (untransformed data).

description: Relationship between structural and temporal forest variables and beetle community structure (untransformed data).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564630
title: Appendix B. Relationship between structural and temporal forest variables and beetle community structure (transformed data).

description: Relationship between structural and temporal forest variables and beetle community structure (transformed data).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564630.v1
title: Appendix B. Relationship between structural and temporal forest variables and beetle community structure (transformed data).

description: Relationship between structural and temporal forest variables and beetle community structure (transformed data).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564627
title: Appendix C. Species list (saproxylic beetles).

description: Species list (saproxylic beetles).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564627.v1
title: Appendix C. Species list (saproxylic beetles).

description: Species list (saproxylic beetles).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564624
title: Appendix A. Species biological traits used in the ecosystem model LINKAGES II in the Central Hardwood Forest Region, U.S.A.

description: Species biological traits used in the ecosystem model LINKAGES II in the Central Hardwood Forest Region, U.S.A.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564621
title: Appendix B. Selected species establishment probabilities (SEPs) by landtype from LINKAGES II for 223An Springfield Plateau ecological subsection for current climate at year 2000 and for four climate scenarios at year 2100.

description: Selected species establishment probabilities (SEPs) by landtype from LINKAGES II for 223An Springfield Plateau ecological subsection for current climate at year 2000 and for four climate scenarios at year 2100.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564624.v1
title: Appendix A. Species biological traits used in the ecosystem model LINKAGES II in the Central Hardwood Forest Region, U.S.A.

description: Species biological traits used in the ecosystem model LINKAGES II in the Central Hardwood Forest Region, U.S.A.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564621.v1
title: Appendix B. Selected species establishment probabilities (SEPs) by landtype from LINKAGES II for 223An Springfield Plateau ecological subsection for current climate at year 2000 and for four climate scenarios at year 2100.

description: Selected species establishment probabilities (SEPs) by landtype from LINKAGES II for 223An Springfield Plateau ecological subsection for current climate at year 2000 and for four climate scenarios at year 2100.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564618
title: Appendix C. The simulated maximum biomass (tons/ha) from LINKAGES II for each ecological subsection for four climate change scenarios at year 2100.

description: The simulated maximum biomass (tons/ha) from LINKAGES II for each ecological subsection for four climate change scenarios at year 2100.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564618.v1
title: Appendix C. The simulated maximum biomass (tons/ha) from LINKAGES II for each ecological subsection for four climate change scenarios at year 2100.

description: The simulated maximum biomass (tons/ha) from LINKAGES II for each ecological subsection for four climate change scenarios at year 2100.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564615
title: Appendix D. Comparisons of the initialized basal area (m2/ha) from LANDIS PRO at 0 simulation year against observed values from USDA Forest Service Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data for each ecological section in the CHFR using Chi-Square test (α=0.05).

description: Comparisons of the initialized basal area (m2/ha) from LANDIS PRO at 0 simulation year against observed values from USDA Forest Service Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data for each ecological section in the CHFR using Chi-Square test (α=0.05).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564615.v1
title: Appendix D. Comparisons of the initialized basal area (m2/ha) from LANDIS PRO at 0 simulation year against observed values from USDA Forest Service Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data for each ecological section in the CHFR using Chi-Square test (α=0.05).

description: Comparisons of the initialized basal area (m2/ha) from LANDIS PRO at 0 simulation year against observed values from USDA Forest Service Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data for each ecological section in the CHFR using Chi-Square test (α=0.05).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564603
title: Appendix E. Comparisons of the initialized density (trees/ha) from LANDIS PRO at 0 simulation year against observed values from USDA Forest Service Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data for each ecological section in the CHFR using Chi-Square test (α=0.05).

description: Comparisons of the initialized density (trees/ha) from LANDIS PRO at 0 simulation year against observed values from USDA Forest Service Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data for each ecological section in the CHFR using Chi-Square test (α=0.05).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564603.v1
title: Appendix E. Comparisons of the initialized density (trees/ha) from LANDIS PRO at 0 simulation year against observed values from USDA Forest Service Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data for each ecological section in the CHFR using Chi-Square test (α=0.05).

description: Comparisons of the initialized density (trees/ha) from LANDIS PRO at 0 simulation year against observed values from USDA Forest Service Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data for each ecological section in the CHFR using Chi-Square test (α=0.05).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564600
title: Appendix A. Data files and column descriptions used for analyses.

description: Data files and column descriptions used for analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564600.v1
title: Appendix A. Data files and column descriptions used for analyses.

description: Data files and column descriptions used for analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564594
title: Supplement 1. Description of the data files used to analyze nurse plant survival and growth, test plant survival and growth, response of Ratibida pinnata to herbivory, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonization and composition.

description: File List Nurse_plant_growth_and_survival_2010_to_2012_data.csv (MD5: 2e847e7eaec86f301382d6f66f06e681) Nurse_plant_growth_and_survival_2010_to_2012_column_description.csv (MD5: 5c8fa110b82d13d379e2dea8db57eaa4) Test_plant_survival_and_growth_data.csv (MD5: e4533227b91105ca9195dbbeecf3f38b) Test_plant_survival_and_growth_column_descriptions.csv (MD5: 46ccf66e56c6fc1cc4418e5c88d8ea48) Ratibida_herbivory_data.csv (MD5: 16a729377316260b2ae36c0f6c103388) Ratibida_herbivory_column_descriptions.csv (MD5: 5c8fa110b82d13d379e2dea8db57eaa4) Field_colonization_data.csv (MD5: 328831a1489a08e5a3184049f59ac72d) Field_colonization_data_column_descriptions.csv (MD5: 9d0ed08cba4bffeb30bc844faba081ea) Field_spore_composition_data.csv (MD5: 6e001664334adf14c9c2943424be6796) Field_spore_composition_data_column_descriptions.csv (MD5: 177608a01dc713174e62427001f48bd3) Description The supplements provide access to the data used in the analyses reported in this paper. There were five separate analyses performed. Nurse plant survival and growth was analyzed without <i>Ratibida pinnata</i>, even though <i>R. pinnata</i> was a nurse plant. Because <i>R. pinnata</i> received heavy herbivory, it was analyzed separately. <i>Sporobolus heterolepis</i>, the test plant, was evaluated independent of nurse plant growth data. Finally, AMF colonization and AMF spore composition from field derived soils were analyzed separately, as well. Files that are labeled “xxxx data.csv” are the data files. These files have a “.” when a cell is blank. Files that are labeled “xxxx column description.csv” describe the column headings for the similarly named data file and report the checksum values for each column.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564591
title: Appendix A. Strength of the relationship for models of area burned explained by AET and WD as the criteria for inclusion into the model varies along a gradient of percent designated wilderness and national park.

description: Strength of the relationship for models of area burned explained by AET and WD as the criteria for inclusion into the model varies along a gradient of percent designated wilderness and national park.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564588
title: Appendix B. Climate for which we used to build the model of expected area burned compared to the climate of the western U.S.

description: Climate for which we used to build the model of expected area burned compared to the climate of the western U.S.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564591.v1
title: Appendix A. Strength of the relationship for models of area burned explained by AET and WD as the criteria for inclusion into the model varies along a gradient of percent designated wilderness and national park.

description: Strength of the relationship for models of area burned explained by AET and WD as the criteria for inclusion into the model varies along a gradient of percent designated wilderness and national park.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564588.v1
title: Appendix B. Climate for which we used to build the model of expected area burned compared to the climate of the western U.S.

description: Climate for which we used to build the model of expected area burned compared to the climate of the western U.S.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564585
title: Appendix C. Variable importance in the statistical model of area burned as a function of climate and partial dependence plots of the four most important variables.

description: Variable importance in the statistical model of area burned as a function of climate and partial dependence plots of the four most important variables.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564585.v1
title: Appendix C. Variable importance in the statistical model of area burned as a function of climate and partial dependence plots of the four most important variables.

description: Variable importance in the statistical model of area burned as a function of climate and partial dependence plots of the four most important variables.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564579
title: Appendix A. Supplemental tables and a figure.

description: Supplemental tables and a figure.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564576
title: Appendix A. Supplemental tables and figures.

description: Supplemental tables and figures.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564576.v1
title: Appendix A. Supplemental tables and figures.

description: Supplemental tables and figures.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564573
title: Appendix A. Brief Model Description of TRIPLEX-FLUX.

description: Brief Model Description of TRIPLEX-FLUX.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564567
title: Supplement 1. R scripts for conducting the analyses described in the article.

description: File List model.demo.Rmd (MD5: 1c973560cea6ae02f66c0547b873ed61) model.assessment.Rmd (MD5: 3c57f28d4400077c7bea02201bc98a7c) Description The code in model.demo.Rmd demonstrates the use of <i>loadflex</i> for model fitting, predictions, and biogeochemical analyses as described in the text, figures, and tables 1 and 2 of the main article. The code in model.assessment.Rmd demonstrates the computation of model performance metrics as described in the text and table 3 of the main article.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564564
title: Appendix A. Study site location, sample sites selection and plot design.

description: Study site location, sample sites selection and plot design.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564564.v1
title: Appendix A. Study site location, sample sites selection and plot design.

description: Study site location, sample sites selection and plot design.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564555
title: Appendix B. Microclimate.

description: Microclimate.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564555.v1
title: Appendix B. Microclimate.

description: Microclimate.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564552
title: Appendix C. Soil properties.

description: Soil properties.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564552.v1
title: Appendix C. Soil properties.

description: Soil properties.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564549
title: Appendix D. Model summaries.

description: Model summaries.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564546
title: Appendix A. An example of SPSS syntax for a full generalised linear mixed model using long-tailed mouse count as a dependent variable.

description: An example of SPSS syntax for a full generalised linear mixed model using long-tailed mouse count as a dependent variable.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564546.v1
title: Appendix A. An example of SPSS syntax for a full generalised linear mixed model using long-tailed mouse count as a dependent variable.

description: An example of SPSS syntax for a full generalised linear mixed model using long-tailed mouse count as a dependent variable.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564543
title: Appendix A. A table showing the complete list of the crop growth parameter values used to model energy cane, based on the CENTURY parameterization of sugarcane in Vallis et al. 1996.

description: A table showing the complete list of the crop growth parameter values used to model energy cane, based on the CENTURY parameterization of sugarcane in Vallis et al. 1996.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564540
title: Appendix B. A table showing the counties used to simulated pasture, corn-soy rotations and energy cane production using the DayCent model, to estimate carbon, nitrogen and greenhouse gas fluxes in the southeastern United States.

description: A table showing the counties used to simulated pasture, corn-soy rotations and energy cane production using the DayCent model, to estimate carbon, nitrogen and greenhouse gas fluxes in the southeastern United States.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564543.v1
title: Appendix A. A table showing the complete list of the crop growth parameter values used to model energy cane, based on the CENTURY parameterization of sugarcane in Vallis et al. 1996.

description: A table showing the complete list of the crop growth parameter values used to model energy cane, based on the CENTURY parameterization of sugarcane in Vallis et al. 1996.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564540.v1
title: Appendix B. A table showing the counties used to simulated pasture, corn-soy rotations and energy cane production using the DayCent model, to estimate carbon, nitrogen and greenhouse gas fluxes in the southeastern United States.

description: A table showing the counties used to simulated pasture, corn-soy rotations and energy cane production using the DayCent model, to estimate carbon, nitrogen and greenhouse gas fluxes in the southeastern United States.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564537
title: Appendix A. Model description and supplemental tables and figures.

description: Model description and supplemental tables and figures.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564537.v1
title: Appendix A. Model description and supplemental tables and figures.

description: Model description and supplemental tables and figures.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564534
title: Supplement 1. Prey preference data from predation experiments.

description: File List Peacock2015_Ecosphere_Supplement.csv (MD5: 3e7c19c31b83ac4911b19a5056c3906b) Description Peacock2015_Ecosphere_Supplement.csv – Summary data from predation experiments involving juvenile pink and chum salmon prey and coho salmon smolts as predators. Column headings are: <b>Experiment</b> – Experiment numbers 1 through 27, where each experiment consisted of paired trials; one with clean prey and one with lousy prey. <b>Date</b> – Date of the trial. <b>Net pen</b> – Which of the two experimental net pens the trial took place in (see Fig. A3). <b>Treatment</b> – No lice or lice, depending on whether the trial used prey that had no sea lice or were infested with at least one sea louse of a chalimus II or more advanced stage. <b>Number of coho</b> – number of coho predators in the trial. <b>Length of trial (h)</b> – the duration that the predators had access to prey in hours. <b>Number of pink at start</b> – the number of pink salmon prey at the beginning of the trial. <b>Number of chum at start</b> – the number of chum salmon prey at the beginning of the trial. <b>Number of pink consumed</b> – the number of pink salmon prey consumed during the trial calculated as the number of pink at the start minus the number of pink at the end. <b>Number of chum consumed</b> - the number of chum salmon prey consumed during the trial. <b>Preference</b> – the value of α calculated by Eq. 8 in the main text.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564534.v1
title: Supplement 1. Prey preference data from predation experiments.

description: File List Peacock2015_Ecosphere_Supplement.csv (MD5: 3e7c19c31b83ac4911b19a5056c3906b) Description Peacock2015_Ecosphere_Supplement.csv – Summary data from predation experiments involving juvenile pink and chum salmon prey and coho salmon smolts as predators. Column headings are: <b>Experiment</b> – Experiment numbers 1 through 27, where each experiment consisted of paired trials; one with clean prey and one with lousy prey. <b>Date</b> – Date of the trial. <b>Net pen</b> – Which of the two experimental net pens the trial took place in (see Fig. A3). <b>Treatment</b> – No lice or lice, depending on whether the trial used prey that had no sea lice or were infested with at least one sea louse of a chalimus II or more advanced stage. <b>Number of coho</b> – number of coho predators in the trial. <b>Length of trial (h)</b> – the duration that the predators had access to prey in hours. <b>Number of pink at start</b> – the number of pink salmon prey at the beginning of the trial. <b>Number of chum at start</b> – the number of chum salmon prey at the beginning of the trial. <b>Number of pink consumed</b> – the number of pink salmon prey consumed during the trial calculated as the number of pink at the start minus the number of pink at the end. <b>Number of chum consumed</b> - the number of chum salmon prey consumed during the trial. <b>Preference</b> – the value of α calculated by Eq. 8 in the main text.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564531
title: Appendix A. Accuracy assessment of pre- and post-treatment vegetation maps.

description: Accuracy assessment of pre- and post-treatment vegetation maps.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564531.v1
title: Appendix A. Accuracy assessment of pre- and post-treatment vegetation maps.

description: Accuracy assessment of pre- and post-treatment vegetation maps.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564525
title: Appendix B. A figure showing California Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis) habitat suitability index for (a) control and (b) treatment firesheds on a 13,482-ha study area in the Sierra Nevada under four scenarios: (1) no fuel treatments and no wildfire; (2) fuel treatments and no wildfire; (3) no fuel treatments and wildfire; and (4) fuel treatments and wildfire.

description: A figure showing California Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis) habitat suitability index for (a) control and (b) treatment firesheds on a 13,482-ha study area in the Sierra Nevada under four scenarios: (1) no fuel treatments and no wildfire; (2) fuel treatments and no wildfire; (3) no fuel treatments and wildfire; and (4) fuel treatments and wildfire.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3564525.v1
title: Appendix B. A figure showing California Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis) habitat suitability index for (a) control and (b) treatment firesheds on a 13,482-ha study area in the Sierra Nevada under four scenarios: (1) no fuel treatments and no wildfire; (2) fuel treatments and no wildfire; (3) no fuel treatments and wildfire; and (4) fuel treatments and wildfire.

description: A figure showing California Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis) habitat suitability index for (a) control and (b) treatment firesheds on a 13,482-ha study area in the Sierra Nevada under four scenarios: (1) no fuel treatments and no wildfire; (2) fuel treatments and no wildfire; (3) no fuel treatments and wildfire; and (4) fuel treatments and wildfire.