cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc27lhx8
title: CCDC 2073370: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Isabel Valencia, Patricia García-García, David Sucunza, Francisco Mendicuti, Juan J. Vaquero|2021|J.Org.Chem.|86|16259|doi:10.1021/acs.joc.1c01095
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5725985
title: Rangeland Analysis Platform - vegetation biomass v2 2014

description: Rangeland Analysis Platform vegetation biomass v2 2014 These data represent estimates of annual aboveground biomass (lbs/acre) as described in Jones et al. (2021) and as accessible on the Rangeland Analysis Platform (https://rangelands.app).<br> Values are estimates of aboveground biomass for the following rangeland functional groups: Band 1 - annual forb and grass<br> Band 2 - perennial forb and grass<br> No Data value = 65535 Although these data were produced across a broad region, they are primarily<br> intended for rangeland ecosystems. Estimates may not be suitable in other<br> ecosystems, e.g., forests, agricultural lands. Data are in WGS84 Geographic Coordinate System (EPSG:4326); spatial resolution<br> is approximately 30m. Please attribute these data to:<br> Jones, M.O., N.P. Robinson, D.E. Naugle, J.D. Maestas, M.C. Reeves, R.W. Lankston, and B.W. Allred. 2021. Annual and 16-Day Rangeland Production Estimates for the Western United States. Rangeland Ecology & Management 77:112–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2021.04.003
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5725984
title: Rangeland Analysis Platform - vegetation biomass v2 2014

description: Rangeland Analysis Platform vegetation biomass v2 2014 These data represent estimates of annual aboveground biomass (lbs/acre) as described in Jones et al. (2021) and as accessible on the Rangeland Analysis Platform (https://rangelands.app).<br> Values are estimates of aboveground biomass for the following rangeland functional groups: Band 1 - annual forb and grass<br> Band 2 - perennial forb and grass<br> No Data value = 65535 Although these data were produced across a broad region, they are primarily<br> intended for rangeland ecosystems. Estimates may not be suitable in other<br> ecosystems, e.g., forests, agricultural lands. Data are in WGS84 Geographic Coordinate System (EPSG:4326); spatial resolution<br> is approximately 30m. Please attribute these data to:<br> Jones, M.O., N.P. Robinson, D.E. Naugle, J.D. Maestas, M.C. Reeves, R.W. Lankston, and B.W. Allred. 2021. Annual and 16-Day Rangeland Production Estimates for the Western United States. Rangeland Ecology & Management 77:112–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2021.04.003
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5727963
title: Rangeland Analysis Platform - vegetation biomass v2 2015

description: Rangeland Analysis Platform vegetation biomass v2 2015 These data represent estimates of annual aboveground biomass (lbs/acre) as described in Jones et al. (2021) and as accessible on the Rangeland Analysis Platform (https://rangelands.app).<br> Values are estimates of aboveground biomass for the following rangeland functional groups: Band 1 - annual forb and grass<br> Band 2 - perennial forb and grass<br> No Data value = 65535 Although these data were produced across a broad region, they are primarily<br> intended for rangeland ecosystems. Estimates may not be suitable in other<br> ecosystems, e.g., forests, agricultural lands. Data are in WGS84 Geographic Coordinate System (EPSG:4326); spatial resolution<br> is approximately 30m. Please attribute these data to:<br> Jones, M.O., N.P. Robinson, D.E. Naugle, J.D. Maestas, M.C. Reeves, R.W. Lankston, and B.W. Allred. 2021. Annual and 16-Day Rangeland Production Estimates for the Western United States. Rangeland Ecology & Management 77:112–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2021.04.003
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5727962
title: Rangeland Analysis Platform - vegetation biomass v2 2015

description: Rangeland Analysis Platform vegetation biomass v2 2015 These data represent estimates of annual aboveground biomass (lbs/acre) as described in Jones et al. (2021) and as accessible on the Rangeland Analysis Platform (https://rangelands.app).<br> Values are estimates of aboveground biomass for the following rangeland functional groups: Band 1 - annual forb and grass<br> Band 2 - perennial forb and grass<br> No Data value = 65535 Although these data were produced across a broad region, they are primarily<br> intended for rangeland ecosystems. Estimates may not be suitable in other<br> ecosystems, e.g., forests, agricultural lands. Data are in WGS84 Geographic Coordinate System (EPSG:4326); spatial resolution<br> is approximately 30m. Please attribute these data to:<br> Jones, M.O., N.P. Robinson, D.E. Naugle, J.D. Maestas, M.C. Reeves, R.W. Lankston, and B.W. Allred. 2021. Annual and 16-Day Rangeland Production Estimates for the Western United States. Rangeland Ecology & Management 77:112–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2021.04.003
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5727876
title: Rangeland Analysis Platform - vegetation biomass v2 2016

description: Rangeland Analysis Platform vegetation biomass v2 2016 These data represent estimates of annual aboveground biomass (lbs/acre) as described in Jones et al. (2021) and as accessible on the Rangeland Analysis Platform (https://rangelands.app).<br> Values are estimates of aboveground biomass for the following rangeland functional groups: Band 1 - annual forb and grass<br> Band 2 - perennial forb and grass<br> No Data value = 65535 Although these data were produced across a broad region, they are primarily<br> intended for rangeland ecosystems. Estimates may not be suitable in other<br> ecosystems, e.g., forests, agricultural lands. Data are in WGS84 Geographic Coordinate System (EPSG:4326); spatial resolution<br> is approximately 30m. Please attribute these data to:<br> Jones, M.O., N.P. Robinson, D.E. Naugle, J.D. Maestas, M.C. Reeves, R.W. Lankston, and B.W. Allred. 2021. Annual and 16-Day Rangeland Production Estimates for the Western United States. Rangeland Ecology & Management 77:112–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2021.04.003
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5727875
title: Rangeland Analysis Platform - vegetation biomass v2 2016

description: Rangeland Analysis Platform vegetation biomass v2 2016 These data represent estimates of annual aboveground biomass (lbs/acre) as described in Jones et al. (2021) and as accessible on the Rangeland Analysis Platform (https://rangelands.app).<br> Values are estimates of aboveground biomass for the following rangeland functional groups: Band 1 - annual forb and grass<br> Band 2 - perennial forb and grass<br> No Data value = 65535 Although these data were produced across a broad region, they are primarily<br> intended for rangeland ecosystems. Estimates may not be suitable in other<br> ecosystems, e.g., forests, agricultural lands. Data are in WGS84 Geographic Coordinate System (EPSG:4326); spatial resolution<br> is approximately 30m. Please attribute these data to:<br> Jones, M.O., N.P. Robinson, D.E. Naugle, J.D. Maestas, M.C. Reeves, R.W. Lankston, and B.W. Allred. 2021. Annual and 16-Day Rangeland Production Estimates for the Western United States. Rangeland Ecology & Management 77:112–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2021.04.003
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5725941
title: Rangeland Analysis Platform - vegetation biomass v2 2017

description: Rangeland Analysis Platform vegetation biomass v2 2017 These data represent estimates of annual aboveground biomass (lbs/acre) as described in Jones et al. (2021) and as accessible on the Rangeland Analysis Platform (https://rangelands.app).<br> Values are estimates of aboveground biomass for the following rangeland functional groups: Band 1 - annual forb and grass<br> Band 2 - perennial forb and grass<br> No Data value = 65535 Although these data were produced across a broad region, they are primarily<br> intended for rangeland ecosystems. Estimates may not be suitable in other<br> ecosystems, e.g., forests, agricultural lands. Data are in WGS84 Geographic Coordinate System (EPSG:4326); spatial resolution<br> is approximately 30m. Please attribute these data to:<br> Jones, M.O., N.P. Robinson, D.E. Naugle, J.D. Maestas, M.C. Reeves, R.W. Lankston, and B.W. Allred. 2021. Annual and 16-Day Rangeland Production Estimates for the Western United States. Rangeland Ecology & Management 77:112–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2021.04.003
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5725940
title: Rangeland Analysis Platform - vegetation biomass v2 2017

description: Rangeland Analysis Platform vegetation biomass v2 2017 These data represent estimates of annual aboveground biomass (lbs/acre) as described in Jones et al. (2021) and as accessible on the Rangeland Analysis Platform (https://rangelands.app).<br> Values are estimates of aboveground biomass for the following rangeland functional groups: Band 1 - annual forb and grass<br> Band 2 - perennial forb and grass<br> No Data value = 65535 Although these data were produced across a broad region, they are primarily<br> intended for rangeland ecosystems. Estimates may not be suitable in other<br> ecosystems, e.g., forests, agricultural lands. Data are in WGS84 Geographic Coordinate System (EPSG:4326); spatial resolution<br> is approximately 30m. Please attribute these data to:<br> Jones, M.O., N.P. Robinson, D.E. Naugle, J.D. Maestas, M.C. Reeves, R.W. Lankston, and B.W. Allred. 2021. Annual and 16-Day Rangeland Production Estimates for the Western United States. Rangeland Ecology & Management 77:112–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2021.04.003
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5725868
title: Rangeland Analysis Platform - vegetation biomass v2 2018

description: Rangeland Analysis Platform vegetation biomass v2 2018 These data represent estimates of annual aboveground biomass (lbs/acre) as described in Jones et al. (2021) and as accessible on the Rangeland Analysis Platform (https://rangelands.app).<br> Values are estimates of aboveground biomass for the following rangeland functional groups: Band 1 - annual forb and grass<br> Band 2 - perennial forb and grass<br> No Data value = 65535 Although these data were produced across a broad region, they are primarily<br> intended for rangeland ecosystems. Estimates may not be suitable in other<br> ecosystems, e.g., forests, agricultural lands. Data are in WGS84 Geographic Coordinate System (EPSG:4326); spatial resolution<br> is approximately 30m. Please attribute these data to:<br> Jones, M.O., N.P. Robinson, D.E. Naugle, J.D. Maestas, M.C. Reeves, R.W. Lankston, and B.W. Allred. 2021. Annual and 16-Day Rangeland Production Estimates for the Western United States. Rangeland Ecology & Management 77:112–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2021.04.003
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5725867
title: Rangeland Analysis Platform - vegetation biomass v2 2018

description: Rangeland Analysis Platform vegetation biomass v2 2018 These data represent estimates of annual aboveground biomass (lbs/acre) as described in Jones et al. (2021) and as accessible on the Rangeland Analysis Platform (https://rangelands.app).<br> Values are estimates of aboveground biomass for the following rangeland functional groups: Band 1 - annual forb and grass<br> Band 2 - perennial forb and grass<br> No Data value = 65535 Although these data were produced across a broad region, they are primarily<br> intended for rangeland ecosystems. Estimates may not be suitable in other<br> ecosystems, e.g., forests, agricultural lands. Data are in WGS84 Geographic Coordinate System (EPSG:4326); spatial resolution<br> is approximately 30m. Please attribute these data to:<br> Jones, M.O., N.P. Robinson, D.E. Naugle, J.D. Maestas, M.C. Reeves, R.W. Lankston, and B.W. Allred. 2021. Annual and 16-Day Rangeland Production Estimates for the Western United States. Rangeland Ecology & Management 77:112–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2021.04.003
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5725836
title: Rangeland Analysis Platform - vegetation biomass v2 2019

description: Rangeland Analysis Platform vegetation biomass v2 2019 These data represent estimates of annual aboveground biomass (lbs/acre) as described in Jones et al. (2021) and as accessible on the Rangeland Analysis Platform (https://rangelands.app).<br> Values are estimates of aboveground biomass for the following rangeland functional groups: Band 1 - annual forb and grass<br> Band 2 - perennial forb and grass<br> No Data value = 65535 Although these data were produced across a broad region, they are primarily<br> intended for rangeland ecosystems. Estimates may not be suitable in other<br> ecosystems, e.g., forests, agricultural lands. Data are in WGS84 Geographic Coordinate System (EPSG:4326); spatial resolution<br> is approximately 30m. Please attribute these data to:<br> Jones, M.O., N.P. Robinson, D.E. Naugle, J.D. Maestas, M.C. Reeves, R.W. Lankston, and B.W. Allred. 2021. Annual and 16-Day Rangeland Production Estimates for the Western United States. Rangeland Ecology & Management 77:112–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2021.04.003
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5725835
title: Rangeland Analysis Platform - vegetation biomass v2 2019

description: Rangeland Analysis Platform vegetation biomass v2 2019 These data represent estimates of annual aboveground biomass (lbs/acre) as described in Jones et al. (2021) and as accessible on the Rangeland Analysis Platform (https://rangelands.app).<br> Values are estimates of aboveground biomass for the following rangeland functional groups: Band 1 - annual forb and grass<br> Band 2 - perennial forb and grass<br> No Data value = 65535 Although these data were produced across a broad region, they are primarily<br> intended for rangeland ecosystems. Estimates may not be suitable in other<br> ecosystems, e.g., forests, agricultural lands. Data are in WGS84 Geographic Coordinate System (EPSG:4326); spatial resolution<br> is approximately 30m. Please attribute these data to:<br> Jones, M.O., N.P. Robinson, D.E. Naugle, J.D. Maestas, M.C. Reeves, R.W. Lankston, and B.W. Allred. 2021. Annual and 16-Day Rangeland Production Estimates for the Western United States. Rangeland Ecology & Management 77:112–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2021.04.003
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5725791
title: Rangeland Analysis Platform - vegetation biomass v2 2020

description: Rangeland Analysis Platform vegetation biomass v2 2020 These data represent estimates of annual aboveground biomass (lbs/acre) as described in Jones et al. (2021) and as accessible on the Rangeland Analysis Platform (https://rangelands.app).<br> Values are estimates of aboveground biomass for the following rangeland functional groups: Band 1 - annual forb and grass<br> Band 2 - perennial forb and grass<br> No Data value = 65535 Although these data were produced across a broad region, they are primarily<br> intended for rangeland ecosystems. Estimates may not be suitable in other<br> ecosystems, e.g., forests, agricultural lands. Data are in WGS84 Geographic Coordinate System (EPSG:4326); spatial resolution<br> is approximately 30m. Please attribute these data to:<br> Jones, M.O., N.P. Robinson, D.E. Naugle, J.D. Maestas, M.C. Reeves, R.W. Lankston, and B.W. Allred. 2021. Annual and 16-Day Rangeland Production Estimates for the Western United States. Rangeland Ecology & Management 77:112–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2021.04.003
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5725790
title: Rangeland Analysis Platform - vegetation biomass v2 2020

description: Rangeland Analysis Platform vegetation biomass v2 2020 These data represent estimates of annual aboveground biomass (lbs/acre) as described in Jones et al. (2021) and as accessible on the Rangeland Analysis Platform (https://rangelands.app).<br> Values are estimates of aboveground biomass for the following rangeland functional groups: Band 1 - annual forb and grass<br> Band 2 - perennial forb and grass<br> No Data value = 65535 Although these data were produced across a broad region, they are primarily<br> intended for rangeland ecosystems. Estimates may not be suitable in other<br> ecosystems, e.g., forests, agricultural lands. Data are in WGS84 Geographic Coordinate System (EPSG:4326); spatial resolution<br> is approximately 30m. Please attribute these data to:<br> Jones, M.O., N.P. Robinson, D.E. Naugle, J.D. Maestas, M.C. Reeves, R.W. Lankston, and B.W. Allred. 2021. Annual and 16-Day Rangeland Production Estimates for the Western United States. Rangeland Ecology & Management 77:112–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2021.04.003
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.17127740.v2
title: Flocculation and gravity flow experiments

description: A excel file includes dataset of 1) changes in blueness in the final experimental deposits (proxy for TOC), 2) current velocity measurements, and 3) turbidity current run-out distances from the experiments.Two experimental movies of runs with 2% Salinity in the basin and 2 & 5% Bentonite currents<br>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.17127740
title: Flocculation and gravity flow experiments

description: A excel file includes dataset of 1) changes in blueness in the final experimental deposits (proxy for TOC), 2) current velocity measurements, and 3) turbidity current run-out distances from the experiments.Two experimental movies of runs with 2% Salinity in the basin and 2 & 5% Bentonite currents<br>
DOI: 10.17632/73nbvs8925.1
title: Ras/MAPK signalling intensity defines subclonal fitness in a mouse model of primary and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma

description: Raw data from figures 1 to 5 Lozano et al 2021
DOI: 10.17632/82k2638mmx.1
title: Dataset LESLLA Writing

description: These data show the results of 6 groups of learners of Dutch as a second language on the same high-stakes A2 language test.
- Lower educated learners in a slow track, at CEFR levels A1 (240 hours of instruction) and A2 (480 hours of instruction)
- Learners with a secondary education background in a standard track, at CEFR levels A1 (120 hours of instruction) and A2 (240 hours of instruction)
- Learners with a tertiary education background in a fast track, at CEFR levels A1 (60 hours of instruction) and A2 (120 hours of instruction)

The test contains 4 tasks, corrected for content and (task 2, 3, 4) for a number of linguistic criteria. The linguistic criteria are scored according to CEFR-based criteria.

The data show that the different track types are differentially effective in terms of test score. The increase in instruction hours does not allow lower educated learners to achieve equivalent test performance levels.
DOI: 10.25345/c55g4d
title: MassIVE MSV000088543 - Exometabolomics of Switchgrass rhizosphere
title: Project studies an impact of abiotic stressors, including N, P and drought on switchgrass rhizosphere metabolites and microbial communities in marginal soil.
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc1zlxcv
title: CCDC 1835428: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Shiv Pal, Nilanjana Sen, Subhrashis Banerjee, Neha Kathewad, Kumar Vanka, Shabana Khan, |2021|CSD Communication|||
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc1zlxdw
title: CCDC 1835429: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Shiv Pal, Nilanjana Sen, Subhrashis Banerjee, Neha Kathewad, Kumar Vanka, Shabana Khan, |2021|CSD Communication|||
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc27wgp9
title: CCDC 2081981: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Hyeonglim Seo|2021|CSD Communication|||
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc27wgqb
title: CCDC 2081982: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Hyeonglim Seo|2021|CSD Communication|||
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc27wgrc
title: CCDC 2081983: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Hyeonglim Seo|2021|CSD Communication|||
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc27wgsd
title: CCDC 2081984: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Hyeonglim Seo|2021|CSD Communication|||
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc27wgtf
title: CCDC 2081985: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Hyeonglim Seo|2021|CSD Communication|||
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc27wgvg
title: CCDC 2081986: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Hyeonglim Seo|2021|CSD Communication|||
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc27wgxj
title: CCDC 2081988: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Hyeonglim Seo|2021|CSD Communication|||
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc27wgyk
title: CCDC 2081989: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Hyeonglim Seo|2021|CSD Communication|||
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc27wgzl
title: CCDC 2081990: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Hyeonglim Seo|2021|CSD Communication|||
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2809h3
title: CCDC 2085664: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Hyeonglim Seo, Kathleen E. Prosser, Mark Kalaj, Johannes Karges, Benjamin L. Dick, Seth M. Cohen|2021|Inorg.Chem.|60|17161|doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c02433
description: Related Article: Hyeonglim Seo|2021|CSD Communication|||
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287m8f
title: CCDC 2092694: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Jiahuan Shen, Zhenzhen Wu, Yi Liu, Yihui Bai, Jiayan Qiu, Zuxiao Zhang, Zheliang Yuan, Gangguo Zhu|2021|Org.Lett.|23|9321|doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.1c03729
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287m9g
title: CCDC 2092695: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Jiahuan Shen, Zhenzhen Wu, Yi Liu, Yihui Bai, Jiayan Qiu, Zuxiao Zhang, Zheliang Yuan, Gangguo Zhu|2021|Org.Lett.|23|9321|doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.1c03729
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc287vq3
title: CCDC 2092925: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Johannes Karges, Hyeonglim Seo, Seth M. Cohen|2021|Dalton Trans.|50|16147|doi:10.1039/D1DT02435C
description: Related Article: Johannes Karges, Hyeonglim Seo, Seth Cohen|2021|CSD Communication|||
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc288hsv
title: CCDC 2093547: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Yang Yangjs|2021|CSD Communication|||
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc28lcnx
title: CCDC 2103029: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Chunlin Deng, Jr. Robert J. Gilliard, Diane A. Dickie|2021|CSD Communication|||
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc28ldcn
title: CCDC 2103051: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: xiangtao chen|2021|CSD Communication|||
description: Related Article: Xiangtao Chen, Lei Yu, Huijing Wang, Wen Zhang, Pei Tang, Fener Chen|2021|Chem.Commun.|57|11669|doi:10.1039/D1CC04980A
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc28lf2d
title: CCDC 2103073: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: F. W. Heinemann, S. Hoffmann, D. Sellmann|2021|CSD Communication|||
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc28lkp4
title: CCDC 2103216: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Wang Guoming Wang|2021|CSD Communication|||
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc28llyf
title: CCDC 2103255: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Li Tian|2021|CSD Communication|||
description: Related Article: Zhi Long Ma, Meng Chen Wang, Li Tian, Zhong Yi Liu|2021|CrystEngComm|23|7253|doi:10.1039/D1CE01093J
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.16831777
title: HGT

description: Phylogenetic tree constructed based on 215 single-copy genes, gene IDs and protein sequences for all acquired genes identified in this work, as well as their multiple sequence alignments, and homologous genes in <i>I. paradoxum</i> and <i>P.</i> <i>sphaericum</i>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.16831777.v6
title: Sequences for HGT

description: Phylogenetic tree constructed based on 215 single-copy genes, gene IDs and protein sequences for all acquired genes identified in this work, as well as their multiple sequence alignments, phylogenetic trees, and homologous genes in <i>I. paradoxum</i> and <i>P.</i> <i>sphaericum</i>