cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/zjcygp
title: Replication Data for: Taking Distributions Seriously: On the Interpretation of the Estimates of Interactive Nonlinear Models

description: The replication package contains the data files, Stata do-files, and R script necessary to replicate the illustrations that appear in "Taking Distributions Seriously: On the Interpretation of the Estimates of Interactive Nonlinear Models" by Andrei Zhirnov, Mert Moral, and Evgeny Sedashov.

Abstract:
In recent decades, political science literature has experienced significant growth in the popularity of non-linear models with multiplicative interaction terms. When one or more constitutive variables are not binary, most studies report the marginal effect of the variable of interest at its sample mean while allowing the other constitutive variable/s to vary along its range and holding all other covariates constant at their means, modes, or medians. In this article, we argue that this conventional approach is not always the most suitable since the marginal effect of a variable at its sample mean might not be sufficiently representative of its prevalent effect at a specific value of the conditioning variable and might produce excessively model-dependent predictions. We propose two procedures to help researchers gain a better understanding of how the typical effect of the variable of interest varies as a function of the conditioning variable: (1) computing and plotting the marginal effects at all in-sample combinations of the values of the constitutive variables, and (2) computing and plotting what we call the "Distribution-Weighted Average Marginal Effect" over the values of the conditioning variable.
description: Volume #, Issue #
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/tammbf
title: Replication Data for: The institutional impacts of algorithmic distribution: Facebook and the Australian news media

description: &lt;b&gt;Replication notes&lt;/b&gt;
To replicate the analysis refer to 

&lt;ul&gt;
 &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href = 'https://dataverse.harvard.edu/api/access/datafile/4567066'&gt;replication_code.pdf&lt;/a&gt;;&lt;/li&gt;
 &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href = 'https://dataverse.harvard.edu/api/access/datafile/4567067'&gt;replication_code.Rmd&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;br&gt;

&lt;b&gt;Paper abstract&lt;/b&gt;
Since changing its algorithm in January 2018 to boost the content of family and friends over other content (including news), Facebook has signalled that it is less interested in news. The long-term impacts of this change for news publishers is still unclear. This is a problem because policymakers and legislators across the world are concerned about the relationship between platforms and publishers. In particular, they are worried that the ability of platforms to make unilateral decisions about how their algorithms operate may harm the economic sustainability of journalism. This article provides some clarity around the relationship between these two parties through a longitudinal study of the Australian news media sector’s relationship with Facebook from 2014 – 2020, with a particular focus on the January 2018 algorithm change.

&lt;br&gt;

We analyse Facebook data (2,082,804 posts from CrowdTangle) and external traffic data from 32 major Australian news outlets. This data is contextualised by additional desk research. We identify a range of trends including the decline of news sharing, the collapse in the performance of ‘social news’, the variable position of social media as a source of referral traffic and most critically, the diffused nature of the 2018 algorithm change. Our approach cannot make direct causal inferences. We can only identify trends in on-platform performance and referral traffic, which we then contextualise with industry reportage. However, the data provides vital longitudinal insights into the performance and responses of individual media outlets, news categories and the Australian media sector as a whole.
description: R, 3.6.1
description: The replication materials include data from CrowdTangle, a public insights tool owned and operated by Facebook. 

<br>

CrowdTangle Team (2020). CrowdTangle. Facebook, Menlo Park, California, United States. List ID: 1445263.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/upbnui
title: Replication Data for: "Local Standards, Behavioral Adjustments, and Welfare: Evaluating California's Ocean-Going Vessel Fuel Rule"

description: This repository contains the code and partial data for the paper "Local Standards, Behavioral Adjustments, and Welfare: Evaluating California's Ocean-Going Vessel Fuel Rule" by Richard Klotz and Julia Berazneva. Some results in this paper require proprietary data available for purchase through various vendors. The readme files contains more details on the data and code provided.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/zmgr5p
title: Replication Data for: A new Omicron lineage with Spike Y451H mutation dominating a new COVID-19 wave in Kilifi, Coastal Kenya: March-May 2023

description: &lt;p&gt;This dataset is part of a study that investigated the genomic epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 in Kenya. This dataset contains results of samples positive for SARS-COV-2 by real-time PCR for the period 1st January to 27th May 2023 from Kilifi. Aside from the samples tested and results of the tests, it also contains the patients’ sociodemographic characteristic and and symptoms. The dataset is used to generate new SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences from RT-PCR positive samples collected in Kilifi. Furthermore, sequenced data from SARS-CoV-2 positive samples gathered in Nairobi, Lamu, Kwale, Mombasa, and Kwale have also been incorporated in the analysis. &lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ntywf7
title: Passed Resolves; Resolves 1914, c.4, SC1/series 228, Petition of [W.A. Tufts]

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: White slave traffic &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25455145"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25455145&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Massachusetts &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: [W.A. Tufts]; committee on social welfare &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;[W.A. Tufts]&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1914-01-14,1914-01-15 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on January 14, 1914 and referred to the committee on social welfare and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on January 15, 1914 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Resolves 1914, c.4, passed January 30, 1914 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/mxbeor
title: Monetary Policy Trade-Offs in a Portfolio Model with Endogenous Asset Supply

description: This paper develops an open economy portfolio balance model with endogenous asset supply. Domestic producers choose an optimal capital structure and finance capital goods through credit, bonds and equity assets. Private households hold a portfolio of domestic and foreign assets, shift balances depending on risk-return considerations, and maximise real consumption in accordance with the law of one price.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt; Within this general equilibrium model, it will be shown that central bank interventions may promote an inefficient international allocation of real capital. The application of expansive monetary interventions throughout the course of economic crises maintains the domestic stock of real capital at the cost of inflation, currency devaluation, distortions of interest rates and asset prices, and risk clusters on the central bank’s balance sheet. Exchange rate stabilising interventions have
the result that the central bank can also stabilise the domestic stock of real capital. However, such interventions produce either risk clusters on the central bank’s balance sheet or changes in the domestic price level.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/zocebt
title: WT_ade2_tma16_single_1min

description: WT_ade2_tma16_single_1min
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/nwhyiq
title: A relação entre ajuda externa brasileira e a coalizão do Brasil no Banco Mundial (2011-2016)

description: Material para replicação
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/afljnx
title: Petition of Ephraim Williams

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Property &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:26855848"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:26855848&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1739-05 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Stockbridge &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Committee on the Indian petitions &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Ephraim Williams&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1739-06-12,1739-06-15,1739-06-20 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received and read and committed in the House on June 12, 1739 and reported and received and read and granted in the House on June 15, 1739 and sent for concurrence and received and read and concurred in the Council on June 20, 1739 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, read, committed, reported, received, read, granted, sent, received, read, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: at the desire of the Revd Mr John Sarjant, the English Inhabitants and Indians dwelling there &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Native American tribe: Stockbridge-Munsee &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: that "Indian town" be incorporated, town incorporation, Stockbridge, established on June 22, 1739, Boston, Housatonic River, minister, meeting house, religious, John Sergeant, John Quincy, Ebenezer Pomeroy, Simon Frost, Jonathan Belcher, [additional documents in volumes, see pages 236-239, 241-244] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Massachusetts Archives volume 31, pages 236-237 &lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/tellso
title: Gloucester Township, New Jersey Bias Incidents Hate Crime Reports January 2018 - May 2021

description: Data from police reports of bias incidents for Gloucester Township, New Jersey in Camden County from January 2018 - May 2021.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.w7sngv
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 0 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "TaxonKey is Gomphrena globosa",
 "Country is Sao Tome and Principe",
 "HasCoordinate is true"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 0 records from 0 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0048873-250811113504898/datasets/export for details.
DOI: 10.26036/cnp0007185
title: The effect of different varieties on the diversity of intestinal microbiota in laying hens(KAKB)

description: The effect of different varieties on the diversity of intestinal microbiota in laying hens(KAKB)
DOI: 10.15468/dl.dcvaut
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 3999 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "Country is United States of America",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 "TaxonKey is Pinus albicaulis Engelm."
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 3999 records from 83 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0003585-250426092105405/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.3vrz7x
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 374 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "TaxonKey is one of (Plethodon fourchensis Duncan & Highton, 1979)"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 374 records from 8 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0003586-250426092105405/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.fzdhq9
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 0 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "TaxonKey is Maulisia Parr, 1960",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false",
 "BasisOfRecord is one of (Specimen, Living Specimen, Observation, Human Observation, Machine Observation, Material sample, Literature Occurrence, Material citation, Occurrence evidence)",
 "Geometry POLYGON ((47.7498 -11.7869,47.7727 -11.4035,47.4196 -11.0667,47.0031 -11.1387,46.8237 -11.3675,46.8362 -11.7955,47.1096 -12.0382,47.5164 -12.0227,47.7498 -11.7869))"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 0 records from 0 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0009494-250525065834625/datasets/export for details.
DOI: 10.3886/e231457
title: Replication data for: Multilateral Trade Bargaining: A First Look at the GATT Bargaining Records

description: This paper empirically examines recently declassified tariff bargaining data from the GATT/WTO. Focusing on the Torquay Round (1950–1951), we document stylized facts about these interconnected high-stakes international negotiations that suggest a lack of strategic behavior among the participating governments and an important multilateral element to the bilateral bargains. We suggest that these features can be understood as emerging from a tariff bargaining forum that emphasizes the GATT pillars of MFN and multilateral reciprocity, and we offer evidence that the relaxation of strict bilateral reciprocity facilitated by the GATT multilateral bargaining forum was important to the success of the GATT approach.
DOI: 10.3886/e231457v1
title: Replication data for: Multilateral Trade Bargaining: A First Look at the GATT Bargaining Records

description: This paper empirically examines recently declassified tariff bargaining data from the GATT/WTO. Focusing on the Torquay Round (1950–1951), we document stylized facts about these interconnected high-stakes international negotiations that suggest a lack of strategic behavior among the participating governments and an important multilateral element to the bilateral bargains. We suggest that these features can be understood as emerging from a tariff bargaining forum that emphasizes the GATT pillars of MFN and multilateral reciprocity, and we offer evidence that the relaxation of strict bilateral reciprocity facilitated by the GATT multilateral bargaining forum was important to the success of the GATT approach.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15548960
title: Selected facets for DataCite Repositories

description: What is a facet?

A facet is a metadata element, usually from a controlled list, that provides counts of records in a query result with particular values for the metadata element. The DataCite JSON Response includes data on a variety of facets for each query done using the DataCite API.

Repository Facets

DataCite Commons uses facets on repository pages to provide an overview of repositories. For example, the Metadata Game Changers Commons page shows publication year, work types, licenses, creators and contributors, and some other facets as graphics and lists.

The facets provided by DataCite can be used to 1) understand characteristics of DataCite metadata, 2) understand some aspects of repository completeness, and 3) provide overviews of repositories.

Using Facets to Understand DataCite Metadata

DataCite includes facets and facet values in all query results, so they are a useful tool for answering some "big picture" questions about DataCite metadata. Some of these questions were explored during 2022 in DataCite Facets: Understanding DataCite Usage using a tool called DataCite Facets.

DataCite Facets and Repository Overviews

DataCite facets can be used to provide overviews of any DataCite Repository and understand some characteristics of the repositories. They can also be used, in some cases, to provide insights into some aspects of repository completeness.

Repository Facets and Metadata Completeness

Many useful repository measures focus on completeness of the metadata, i.e., the portion of records in the repository that include some metadata element. The DataCite facet data can provide some insight into completeness, but we must keep in mind that the facet data are limited to top ten values for most facets (except for published and resourceTypes, which can be > 10). The blog DataCite Facets and Metadata Completeness describes how some facets can be used to provide insights into metadata completeness.

This dataset provides selected facets downloaded using the DataCite API and associated statistics as a comma-separated-value (CSV) file.

Column definitions:

The dataset includes a number of columns for the selected facets:






Statistic



Description







number



The number of facet values





max



The number of occurrences of the most common facet value





common



The most common facet value





total



The total number of records in the top 10, i.e. the total listed in the facets





homogeneity (HI)



An indicator of homogeneity of the facet: maximum count / total count (0.1 = uniform, 1.0 = single item)





coverage



The % of all records covered by the top 10 (numbers close to 100% are good)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15549013
title: Selected facets for DataCite Repositories

description: What is a facet?

A facet is a metadata element, usually from a controlled list, that provides counts of records in a query result with particular values for the metadata element. The DataCite JSON Response includes data on a variety of facets for each query done using the DataCite API.

Repository Facets

DataCite Commons uses facets on repository pages to provide an overview of repositories. For example, the Metadata Game Changers Commons page shows publication year, work types, licenses, creators and contributors, and some other facets as graphics and lists.

The facets provided by DataCite can be used to 1) understand characteristics of DataCite metadata, 2) understand some aspects of repository completeness, and 3) provide overviews of repositories.

Using Facets to Understand DataCite Metadata

DataCite includes facets and facet values in all query results, so they are a useful tool for answering some "big picture" questions about DataCite metadata. Some of these questions were explored during 2022 in DataCite Facets: Understanding DataCite Usage using a tool called DataCite Facets.

DataCite Facets and Repository Overviews

DataCite facets can be used to provide overviews of any DataCite Repository and understand some characteristics of the repositories. They can also be used, in some cases, to provide insights into some aspects of repository completeness.

Repository Facets and Metadata Completeness

Many useful repository measures focus on completeness of the metadata, i.e., the portion of records in the repository that include some metadata element. The DataCite facet data can provide some insight into completeness, but we must keep in mind that the facet data are limited to top ten values for most facets (except for published and resourceTypes, which can be > 10). The blog DataCite Facets and Metadata Completeness describes how some facets can be used to provide insights into metadata completeness.

This dataset provides selected facets downloaded using the DataCite API and associated statistics as a comma-separated-value (CSV) file.

Column definitions:

The dataset includes a number of columns for the selected facets:






Statistic



Description







number



The number of facet values





max



The number of occurrences of the most common facet value





common



The most common facet value





total



The total number of records in the top 10, i.e. the total listed in the facets





homogeneity (HI)



An indicator of homogeneity of the facet: maximum count / total count (0.1 = uniform, 1.0 = single item)





coverage



The % of all records covered by the top 10 (numbers close to 100% are good)