DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18365002
title: N.E.M.E.S.I.S.™ Negotiation Entitlement, Mandate Enforcement & Strategic Irreversibility A Sovereign Doctrine of Negotiation Authority, State Continuity, and Irreversible Commitment in International Statecraft

description:  



N.E.M.E.S.I.S.™ — Negotiation Entitlement, Mandate Enforcement & Strategic Irreversibility System

Canonical Edition

Creator & Originator: Dr. B. MazumdarORCID: 0009-0007-5615-3558DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18365002

Classification: Sovereign-Grade Diplomatic Authority DoctrineDomain: Foreign Ministers · Senior Diplomats · Permanent Foreign Services · Treaty & Crisis Negotiation AuthoritiesStatus: Original · Canonical · Closed Intellectual Property



Abstract / Description

N.E.M.E.S.I.S.™ is a sovereign-grade doctrinal framework that, for the first time in international statecraft, formally engineers who is entitled to negotiate on behalf of a state, under what mandate, and at which point a negotiation becomes strategically irreversible.

Conventional diplomacy treats negotiation authority as implicit in office and commitments as politically reversible. This assumption has produced systemic state failures—unauthorized negotiations, post-election reversals, ministerial scapegoating, and long-term credibility collapse. N.E.M.E.S.I.S.™ corrects this structural flaw by redefining negotiation authority as a protected sovereign asset, not a discretionary political activity.

The doctrine introduces a closed four-layer architecture:



Negotiation Entitlement Gate (N.E.G.™) — verifies and limits sovereign authority to negotiate.

Mandate Binding Engine (M.B.E.™) — locks negotiation scope to pre-authorized sovereign mandates.

Strategic Point-of-No-Return Map (S.P.N.R.™) — identifies and governs irreversible negotiation thresholds.

Diplomatic Liability Firewall (D.L.F.™) — separates individual action from sovereign consequence, protecting ministers while preserving accountability.


At the core of the framework lies the Mazumdar Negotiation Irreversibility Law™, which establishes that beyond a critical entitlement-mandate threshold, reversal inflicts greater and non-recoverable damage to state credibility than compliance—irrespective of regime change or leadership intent.

N.E.M.E.S.I.S.™ is authority-centric, not personality-centric. It binds negotiation power as a sovereign function that survives elections, cabinet reshuffles, and regime transitions. The doctrine does not alter constitutional hierarchy, centralize political power, or override democratic processes. Instead, it operates as a protective layer that governs when diplomacy becomes binding, irreversible, and sovereignly enforceable.

This Zenodo record serves as the canonical public registration and timestamped authorship declaration of N.E.M.E.S.I.S.™.The framework is not open-source, not derivative, and not a policy recommendation.All rights of origination, attribution, and licensing remain exclusively with the creator.

N.E.M.E.S.I.S.™ introduces a new doctrinal class in international relations: Negotiation Sovereignty Engineering.



Keywords

Sovereign Negotiation · Diplomatic Authority · Mandate Enforcement · Strategic Irreversibility · State Continuity · Foreign Policy Doctrine · International Statecraft · Sovereign Risk Governance