cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5810520
title: _A_LeavesSxPv10vsv12-GCMS.output.raw

description: pISA-tree file path: _p_SUSPHIRE\_I_T21_SXPsysbio\_S_P1_SxPv10vsSxP12\_A_LeavesSxPv10vsv12-GCMS\output\raw Title: Leaf volatilome of SxPv1.0, SxPv1.2 T1 and WT<br> Description: The purpose of this assay is to define the volatilome of SxPv1.0, v1.2 and WT <em>Nicotiana benthamiana</em> plant leaves, focusing on the differences between them, by GC-MS.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5810526
title: _A_RootsSxPv10vsv12-GCMS.output.raw

description: pISA-tree file path: _p_SUSPHIRE\_I_T21_SXPsysbio\_S_P1_SxPv10vsSxP12\_A_RootsSxPv10vsv12-GCMS\output\raw Title: Roots volatilome of SxPv1.0, SxPv1.2 T1 and WT<br> Description: The purpose of this assay is to define the volatilome of SxPv1.0, v1.2 and WT <em>Nicotiana benthamiana</em> plant roots, focusing on the differences between them, by GC-MS.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5810525
title: _A_RootsSxPv10vsv12-GCMS.output.raw

description: pISA-tree file path: _p_SUSPHIRE\_I_T21_SXPsysbio\_S_P1_SxPv10vsSxP12\_A_RootsSxPv10vsv12-GCMS\output\raw Title: Roots volatilome of SxPv1.0, SxPv1.2 T1 and WT<br> Description: The purpose of this assay is to define the volatilome of SxPv1.0, v1.2 and WT <em>Nicotiana benthamiana</em> plant roots, focusing on the differences between them, by GC-MS.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5810478
title: _A_TransientSPv11andSPv12-GCMS.output.raw

description: pISA-tree file path: _p_SUSPHIRE\_I_T21_SXPsysbio\_S_P1_SPv1TransientExp\_A_TransientSPv11andSPv12-GCMS\output\raw Title: Transient expression of constructs for SxPv1.1 and SxPv1.2<br> Description: The constructs for SxPv1.1 and SxPv1.2 were tested transiently in <em>Nicotiana benthamiana</em> leaves. Pheromone content was analysed via GC-MS<br>
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5810477
title: _A_TransientSPv11andSPv12-GCMS.output.raw

description: pISA-tree file path: _p_SUSPHIRE\_I_T21_SXPsysbio\_S_P1_SPv1TransientExp\_A_TransientSPv11andSPv12-GCMS\output\raw Title: Transient expression of constructs for SxPv1.1 and SxPv1.2<br> Description: The constructs for SxPv1.1 and SxPv1.2 were tested transiently in <em>Nicotiana benthamiana</em> leaves. Pheromone content was analysed via GC-MS<br>
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5810482
title: _A_SP10T0Analysis-GCMS.output.raw

description: pISA-tree file path: _p_SUSPHIRE\_I_T21_SXPsysbio\_S_P1_SPv10T0andT1\_A_SP10T0Analysis-GCMS\output\raw Title: Analysis of SPv1.0 T0 plants<br> Description: Stable transformation of <em>Nicotiana benthamiana</em> plants with the three enzymes for moth pheromone production (AtrD11, HarFAR, EaDAct) expressed constitutively
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5810481
title: _A_SP10T0Analysis-GCMS.output.raw

description: pISA-tree file path: _p_SUSPHIRE\_I_T21_SXPsysbio\_S_P1_SPv10T0andT1\_A_SP10T0Analysis-GCMS\output\raw Title: Analysis of SPv1.0 T0 plants<br> Description: Stable transformation of <em>Nicotiana benthamiana</em> plants with the three enzymes for moth pheromone production (AtrD11, HarFAR, EaDAct) expressed constitutively
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5810534
title: _A_SxPv12ScreeningT2-GCMS.output.raw

description: pISA-tree file path: _p_SUSPHIRE\_I_T21_SXPsysbio\_S_P1_SxPv12T2\_A_SxPv12ScreeningT2-GCMS\output\raw Title: Screening of sex pheromone production in SexyPlant v1.2 T2 transgenic generation for further RNASeq analysis.<br> Description: The purpose of this study is to screen the population of T2 transgenic generation of SxPv1.2, to analyze the production of moth sex pheromones in these plants and be able to choose from them the most interesting ones in terms of production for further RNASeq analysis.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5810533
title: _A_SxPv12ScreeningT2-GCMS.output.raw

description: pISA-tree file path: _p_SUSPHIRE\_I_T21_SXPsysbio\_S_P1_SxPv12T2\_A_SxPv12ScreeningT2-GCMS\output\raw Title: Screening of sex pheromone production in SexyPlant v1.2 T2 transgenic generation for further RNASeq analysis.<br> Description: The purpose of this study is to screen the population of T2 transgenic generation of SxPv1.2, to analyze the production of moth sex pheromones in these plants and be able to choose from them the most interesting ones in terms of production for further RNASeq analysis.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5810507
title: _A_SxPAlternativeAcetyltransferases-GCMS.output.raw

description: pISA-tree file path: _p_SUSPHIRE\_I_T21_SXPsysbio\_S_P1_SxPAltAcTransferases\_A_SxPAlternativeAcetyltransferases-GCMS\output\raw Title: Assay of transient expression of alternative acetyltransferases<br> Description: The purpose of this assay is to test the efficiency of conversion of Z11-16OH to Z11-16OAc, in the search of a more efficient alternative to the already used EaDact acetyltransferase gene, chosen for the generation of the SxPv10 and SxPv12. The expression is assayed in a transient expression assay on WT Nicotiana benthamiana plants, agroinfiltrated with the combination of the two previous genes required in the metabolic pathway of moth sex pheromones plus the assayed acetyltransferase gene. Samples were finally measured by GC-MS.<br>
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5810506
title: _A_SxPAlternativeAcetyltransferases-GCMS.output.raw

description: pISA-tree file path: _p_SUSPHIRE\_I_T21_SXPsysbio\_S_P1_SxPAltAcTransferases\_A_SxPAlternativeAcetyltransferases-GCMS\output\raw Title: Assay of transient expression of alternative acetyltransferases<br> Description: The purpose of this assay is to test the efficiency of conversion of Z11-16OH to Z11-16OAc, in the search of a more efficient alternative to the already used EaDact acetyltransferase gene, chosen for the generation of the SxPv10 and SxPv12. The expression is assayed in a transient expression assay on WT Nicotiana benthamiana plants, agroinfiltrated with the combination of the two previous genes required in the metabolic pathway of moth sex pheromones plus the assayed acetyltransferase gene. Samples were finally measured by GC-MS.<br>
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5810486
title: _A_SP10T1Analysis-GCMS.output.raw

description: pISA-tree file path: _p_SUSPHIRE\_I_T21_SXPsysbio\_S_P1_SPv10T0andT1\_A_SP10T1Analysis-GCMS\output\raw Title: Analysis of SPv1.0 T1 plants<br> Description: Analysis of pheromone content in T1 generation of SPv1.0 plants
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5810485
title: _A_SP10T1Analysis-GCMS.output.raw

description: pISA-tree file path: _p_SUSPHIRE\_I_T21_SXPsysbio\_S_P1_SPv10T0andT1\_A_SP10T1Analysis-GCMS\output\raw Title: Analysis of SPv1.0 T1 plants<br> Description: Analysis of pheromone content in T1 generation of SPv1.0 plants
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5810495
title: _A_SPv10T3Analysis-GCMS.output.raw

description: pISA-tree file path: _p_SUSPHIRE\_I_T21_SXPsysbio\_S_P1_SPv10T2andT3\_A_SPv10T3Analysis-GCMS\output\raw\ Title: Analysis of SPv1.0 T3 plants<br> Description: Analysis of pheromone content in T3 generation of SPv1.0 plants
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5810494
title: _A_SPv10T3Analysis-GCMS.output.raw

description: pISA-tree file path: _p_SUSPHIRE\_I_T21_SXPsysbio\_S_P1_SPv10T2andT3\_A_SPv10T3Analysis-GCMS\output\raw\ Title: Analysis of SPv1.0 T3 plants<br> Description: Analysis of pheromone content in T3 generation of SPv1.0 plants
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5810490
title: _A_SPv10T2Analysis-GCMS.output.raw

description: pISA-tree file path: _p_SUSPHIRE\_I_T21_SXPsysbio\_S_P1_SPv10T2andT3\_A_SPv10T2Analysis-GCMS\output\raw Title: Analysis of SPv1.0 T2 plants<br> Description: Analysis of pheromone content in T2 generation of SPv1.0 plants<br>
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5810489
title: _A_SPv10T2Analysis-GCMS.output.raw

description: pISA-tree file path: _p_SUSPHIRE\_I_T21_SXPsysbio\_S_P1_SPv10T2andT3\_A_SPv10T2Analysis-GCMS\output\raw Title: Analysis of SPv1.0 T2 plants<br> Description: Analysis of pheromone content in T2 generation of SPv1.0 plants<br>
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5810468
title: _A_SPv10EaDActAnalysis-GCMS.output.raw

description: pISA-tree file path: _p_SUSPHIRE\_I_T21_SXPsysbio\_S_P1_SPv1TransientExp\_A_SPv10EaDActAnalysis-GCMS\output\raw Title: Transient expression in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves of the moth pheromone pathway with and without EaDAct<br> Description: The effect of EaDAct in pheromone production was studied by agroinfiltrating in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves the first two enzymes (AtrD11 and HarFAR) with or without the last enzyme EaDAct. P19 was also agroinfiltrated as negative control.<br>
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5810467
title: _A_SPv10EaDActAnalysis-GCMS.output.raw

description: pISA-tree file path: _p_SUSPHIRE\_I_T21_SXPsysbio\_S_P1_SPv1TransientExp\_A_SPv10EaDActAnalysis-GCMS\output\raw Title: Transient expression in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves of the moth pheromone pathway with and without EaDAct<br> Description: The effect of EaDAct in pheromone production was studied by agroinfiltrating in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves the first two enzymes (AtrD11 and HarFAR) with or without the last enzyme EaDAct. P19 was also agroinfiltrated as negative control.<br>
DOI: 10.17909/5w65-rr60
title: Data from "Demographics of the M-star Multiple Population in the Orion Nebula Cluster"

description: We used the *flt.fits data to fit empirical PSF models to known cluster members and look for close companions.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6615386
title: TCAB: Text Classification Attack Benchmark Dataset

description: TCAB is a large collection of successful adversarial attacks on state-of-the-art text classification models trained on multiple sentiment and abuse domain datasets. The dataset is broken up into 2 files: <em>train.csv</em>, and <em>val.csv</em>. The training set contains 1,448,751 instances (552,364 are "clean" unperturbed instances), while the validation set contains 482,914 instances (178,607 are "clean"). Each instance in both files have the following attributes: <strong>scenario</strong>: Domain, either <em>abuse</em> or <em>sentiment</em>. <strong>target_model_dataset</strong>: Dataset being attacked. <strong>target_model_train_dataset</strong>: Dataset the target model trained on. <strong>target_model</strong>: Type of victim model (e.g., <em>bert</em>, <em>roberta</em>, <em>xlnet</em>). <strong>attack_toolchain</strong>: Open-source attack toolchain, either TextAttack or OpenAttack. <strong>attack_name</strong>: Name of the attack method. <strong>original_text</strong>: Original input text. <strong>original_output</strong>: Prediction probabilities of the target model on the original text. <strong>ground_truth</strong>: Encoded label for the original task of the domain dataset. 1 and 0 means toxic and toxic for abuse datasets, respectively. 1 and 0 means positive and negative sentiment for sentiment datasets. If there is a neutral sentiment, then 2, 1, 0 means positive, neutral, and negative sentiment. <strong>status</strong>: Unperturbed example if "clean"; successful adversarial attack if "success". <strong>perturbed_text</strong>: Text after it has been perturbed by an attack. <strong>perturbed_output</strong>: Prediction probabilities of the target model on the perturbed text. <strong>attack_time</strong>: Time taken to execute the attack. <strong>num_queries</strong>: Number of queries performed while attacking. <strong>frac_words_changed</strong>: Fraction of words changed due to an attack. <strong>test_index</strong>: Index of each unique source example (original instance) (LEGACY - necessary for backwards compatibility). <strong>original_text_identifier</strong>: Index of each unique source example (original instance). <strong>unique_src_instance_identifier</strong>: Primary key to uniquely identify to every source instance; comprised of (<em>target_model_dataset</em>, <em>test_index</em>, <em>original_text_identifier</em>). <strong>pk</strong>: Primary key to uniquely identify every attack instance; comprised of (<em>attack_name</em>, <em>attack_toolchain</em>, <em>original_text_identifier</em>, <em>scenario</em>, <em>target_model</em>, <em>target_model_dataset</em>, <em>test_index).</em>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.14893398
title: SoilHet2_Plot_SpeciesComposition

description: SoilHet2 Plot species composition. Data was collected each year during the month of August beginning in 2018. Plots are 4.6m x 4m and plant abundance was recorded using percent cover. Plots are divided into either 120 40cm x 40cm patches or 480 20cm x 20cm patches. These patches were used to create different forms of heterogeneity that would be visible at the plot level. The percent cover used in this data set is relative to the whole plot and not an individual patch. For a brief overview: we tested how the spatial pattern of seed arrival (aggregated versus uniform seed mixtures), soil heterogeneity, and patch size influence species richness in grassland plant communities in south-central Kansas. We established 96, 4x4.8 m plots each divided into 120 large-scale (0.4x0.4 m) or 480 small-scale (0.2x0.2 m) patches. We then excavated, mixed, and redistributed soil within each plot to create either homogenous or heterogeneous soil conditions. Finally, seeds from 40 species were then sown with either one species per soil patch, to create aggregated species distributions within plots, or were sown uniformly across plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.14893416.v1
title: SoilHet2_Patch_SpeciesComposition

description: SoilHet2 patch level species composition. Data was collected each year during the months of June and ended at the end of July beginning in 2017. Plots are 4.6m x 4m and plant abundance was recorded using percent cover. Plots are divided into either 120 40cm x 40cm patches or 480 20cm x 20cm patches. These patches were used to create different forms of heterogeneity that would be visible at the plot level. For a brief overview: we tested how the spatial pattern of seed arrival (aggregated versus uniform seed mixtures), soil heterogeneity, and patch size influence species richness in grassland plant communities in south-central Kansas. We established 96, 4x4.8 m plots each divided into 120 large-scale (0.4x0.4 m) or 480 small-scale (0.2x0.2 m) patches. We then excavated, mixed, and redistributed soil within each plot to create either homogenous or heterogeneous soil conditions. Finally, seeds from 40 species were then sown with either one species per soil patch, to create aggregated species distributions within plots, or were sown uniformly across plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21365658.v1
title: SoilHet2_Phytometer_Data

description: Data from a phytometer assay used to asses the extent to which soil manipulations alter the magnitude of heterogeneity. We filled 68 L pots with one of the four soil types and then moved each to a randomly assigned position in an area adjacent to the experimental plots. Seeds from one of our 40 species were then sown into each pot. Following three growing seasons, a greenhouse assay was conducted to assess the effects of soil heterogeneity and plant conditioning on total plant biomass, one way of measuring plant productivity. The plant species used for the greenhouse assay were selected based on their success in the conditioning phase and their relative abundance in the experimental plots. The species chosen represented the key functional group found in the field experiment: the graminoids <em>Schizachyrium scoparium</em> ([Michx]. Nash) and <em>Sorghastrum nutans </em>([L.] Nash), the forbs <em>Helianthus maximilliani</em> (Shrad.) and <em>Ratibida pinnata </em>([Vent.] Barnhart), and the legume <em>Desmodium canadense </em>([L.] DC.). We used the soil from each field pot to fill 60 conical-shaped pots with a volume of 655 cm3. Approximately 5-10 seeds of each species were sown into each pot and then thinned to one individual plant. After a growth period of twelve weeks, plants were extracted from the pots and split into roots and shoots. Roots were separated from soil by placing the soil in a 4 mm soil sieve suspended in water. We gently agitated the roots to remove the soil and then patted the roots dry with a paper towel. The root or shoot biomass was placed into labeled envelopes and dried for at least forty-eight hours in an oven at 60°C. Aboveground and belowground biomass were weighed and recorded.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.14893416
title: SoilHet2_Patch_SpeciesComposition

description: SoilHet2 patch level species composition. Data was collected each year during the months of June and ended at the end of July beginning in 2017. Plots are 4.6m x 4m and plant abundance was recorded using percent cover. Plots are divided into either 120 40cm x 40cm patches or 480 20cm x 20cm patches. These patches were used to create different forms of heterogeneity that would be visible at the plot level. For a brief overview: we tested how the spatial pattern of seed arrival (aggregated versus uniform seed mixtures), soil heterogeneity, and patch size influence species richness in grassland plant communities in south-central Kansas. We established 96, 4x4.8 m plots each divided into 120 large-scale (0.4x0.4 m) or 480 small-scale (0.2x0.2 m) patches. We then excavated, mixed, and redistributed soil within each plot to create either homogenous or heterogeneous soil conditions. Finally, seeds from 40 species were then sown with either one species per soil patch, to create aggregated species distributions within plots, or were sown uniformly across plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.14893416.v3
title: SoilHet2_Patch_SpeciesComposition

description: SoilHet2 patch level species composition. Data was collected each year during the months of June and ended at the end of July beginning in 2017. Plots are 4.6m x 4m and plant abundance was recorded using percent cover. Plots are divided into either 120 40cm x 40cm patches or 480 20cm x 20cm patches. These patches were used to create different forms of heterogeneity that would be visible at the plot level. For a brief overview: we tested how the spatial pattern of seed arrival (aggregated versus uniform seed mixtures), soil heterogeneity, and patch size influence species richness in grassland plant communities in south-central Kansas. We established 96, 4x4.8 m plots each divided into 120 large-scale (0.4x0.4 m) or 480 small-scale (0.2x0.2 m) patches. We then excavated, mixed, and redistributed soil within each plot to create either homogenous or heterogeneous soil conditions. Finally, seeds from 40 species were then sown with either one species per soil patch, to create aggregated species distributions within plots, or were sown uniformly across plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.14893416.v2
title: SoilHet2_Patch_SpeciesComposition

description: SoilHet2 patch level species composition. Data was collected each year during the months of June and ended at the end of July beginning in 2017. Plots are 4.6m x 4m and plant abundance was recorded using percent cover. Plots are divided into either 120 40cm x 40cm patches or 480 20cm x 20cm patches. These patches were used to create different forms of heterogeneity that would be visible at the plot level. For a brief overview: we tested how the spatial pattern of seed arrival (aggregated versus uniform seed mixtures), soil heterogeneity, and patch size influence species richness in grassland plant communities in south-central Kansas. We established 96, 4x4.8 m plots each divided into 120 large-scale (0.4x0.4 m) or 480 small-scale (0.2x0.2 m) patches. We then excavated, mixed, and redistributed soil within each plot to create either homogenous or heterogeneous soil conditions. Finally, seeds from 40 species were then sown with either one species per soil patch, to create aggregated species distributions within plots, or were sown uniformly across plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21365658
title: SoilHet2_Phytometer_Data

description: Data from a phytometer assay used to asses the extent to which soil manipulations alter the magnitude of heterogeneity. We filled 68 L pots with one of the four soil types and then moved each to a randomly assigned position in an area adjacent to the experimental plots. Seeds from one of our 40 species were then sown into each pot. Following three growing seasons, a greenhouse assay was conducted to assess the effects of soil heterogeneity and plant conditioning on total plant biomass, one way of measuring plant productivity. The plant species used for the greenhouse assay were selected based on their success in the conditioning phase and their relative abundance in the experimental plots. The species chosen represented the key functional group found in the field experiment: the graminoids <em>Schizachyrium scoparium</em> ([Michx]. Nash) and <em>Sorghastrum nutans </em>([L.] Nash), the forbs <em>Helianthus maximilliani</em> (Shrad.) and <em>Ratibida pinnata </em>([Vent.] Barnhart), and the legume <em>Desmodium canadense </em>([L.] DC.). We used the soil from each field pot to fill 60 conical-shaped pots with a volume of 655 cm3. Approximately 5-10 seeds of each species were sown into each pot and then thinned to one individual plant. After a growth period of twelve weeks, plants were extracted from the pots and split into roots and shoots. Roots were separated from soil by placing the soil in a 4 mm soil sieve suspended in water. We gently agitated the roots to remove the soil and then patted the roots dry with a paper towel. The root or shoot biomass was placed into labeled envelopes and dried for at least forty-eight hours in an oven at 60°C. Aboveground and belowground biomass were weighed and recorded.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21365658.v2
title: SoilHet2_Phytometer_Data

description: Data from a phytometer assay used to asses the extent to which soil manipulations alter the magnitude of heterogeneity. We filled 68 L pots with one of the four soil types and then moved each to a randomly assigned position in an area adjacent to the experimental plots. Seeds from one of our 40 species were then sown into each pot. Following three growing seasons, a greenhouse assay was conducted to assess the effects of soil heterogeneity and plant conditioning on total plant biomass, one way of measuring plant productivity. The plant species used for the greenhouse assay were selected based on their success in the conditioning phase and their relative abundance in the experimental plots. The species chosen represented the key functional group found in the field experiment: the graminoids <em>Schizachyrium scoparium</em> ([Michx]. Nash) and <em>Sorghastrum nutans </em>([L.] Nash), the forbs <em>Helianthus maximilliani</em> (Shrad.) and <em>Ratibida pinnata </em>([Vent.] Barnhart), and the legume <em>Desmodium canadense </em>([L.] DC.). We used the soil from each field pot to fill 60 conical-shaped pots with a volume of 655 cm3. Approximately 5-10 seeds of each species were sown into each pot and then thinned to one individual plant. After a growth period of twelve weeks, plants were extracted from the pots and split into roots and shoots. Roots were separated from soil by placing the soil in a 4 mm soil sieve suspended in water. We gently agitated the roots to remove the soil and then patted the roots dry with a paper towel. The root or shoot biomass was placed into labeled envelopes and dried for at least forty-eight hours in an oven at 60°C. Aboveground and belowground biomass were weighed and recorded.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7226615
title: Data: Quasi-global Convection-permitting Simulations of Tidally Locked Rocky Planets

description: Here are the data and scripts used for creating the figures in the paper, "Quasi-global Convection-permitting Simulations of Tidally Locked Rocky Planets".
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7226614
title: Data: Quasi-global Convection-permitting Simulations of Tidally Locked Rocky Planets

description: Here are the data and scripts used for creating the figures in the paper, "Quasi-global Convection-permitting Simulations of Tidally Locked Rocky Planets".