cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4050345
title: Spectral induced polarization of non-consolidated clays

description: We present a spectral induced polarization dataset on four different types of clay (red and green montmorillonite samples, kaolinite sample, and illite sample) at five different salinities (from de-ionised water to 1 mol/L NaCl), and additionally two other clay samples (beige montmorillonite sample and Boom clay sample) at three differente salinities (from de-ionised water to 1 mol/L NaCl). Each file has its header, describing each column. The logic of the filenames is: "Clay type_salinity_SIP_raw".txt <br> These results are published in Mendieta et al. (2021):<br> https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020JB021125 (pre-print: doi:10.1002/essoar.10505885.2)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6754562
title: Spectral induced polarization of non-consolidated clays

description: We present a spectral induced polarization dataset on four different types of clay (red and green montmorillonite samples, kaolinite sample, and illite sample) at five different salinities (from de-ionised water to 1 mol/L NaCl), and additionally two other clay samples (beige montmorillonite sample and Boom clay sample) at three differente salinities (from de-ionised water to 1 mol/L NaCl). Each file has its header, describing each column. The logic of the filenames is: "Clay type_salinity_SIP_raw".txt <br> These results are published in Mendieta et al. (2021):<br> https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020JB021125 (pre-print: doi:10.1002/essoar.10505885.2)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4050344
title: Spectral induced polarization of non-consolidated clays

description: We present a spectral induced polarization dataset on four different types of clay (red and green montmorillonite samples, kaolinite sample, and illite sample) at five different salinities (from de-ionised water to 1 mol/L NaCl), and additionally two other clay samples (beige montmorillonite sample and Boom clay sample) at three differente salinities (from de-ionised water to 1 mol/L NaCl). Each file has its header, describing each column. The logic of the filenames is: "Clay type_salinity_SIP_raw".txt <br> These results are published in Mendieta et al. (2021):<br> https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020JB021125 (pre-print: doi:10.1002/essoar.10505885.2)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5270268
title: Spectral induced polarization of non-consolidated heterogeneous clay mixtures

description: We present a spectral induced polarization dataset on heterogeneous mixtures of illite and red montmorillonite, with two longitudinal, and one transversal arrangement. Additionally, there is a 50-50% in volume content homogeneous mixture of illite and red montmorillonite. Each file has its header, describing each column. The ReadMe file also explains the content and format of each dataset.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21116827
title: original data of NMOSD patients

description: original data of NMOSD patients
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21116827.v1
title: original data of NMOSD patients

description: original data of NMOSD patients
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21116827.v2
title: original data of NMOSD patients

description: original data of NMOSD patients
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7323595
title: Data and Material for the master's thesis: Cost of code review goals and code review strategies

description: Data and Material for the master's thesis: Cost of review goals and review strategies
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7323594
title: Data and Material for the master's thesis: Cost of code review goals and code review strategies

description: Data and Material for the master's thesis: Cost of review goals and review strategies
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21559308
title: JSSR data set

description: Peruvian dataset for constructive replication of Krantz et al. study <br> <br>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21559308.v1
title: JSSR data set

description: Peruvian dataset for constructive replication of Krantz et al. study <br> <br>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21556554
title: Tarp impacts on crop growth

description: These data demonstrate the impacts of tarps on crop (lettuce, <em>Lactuca sativa</em>) growth. We planted lettuce 1 week after tarp removal and surveyed lettuce growth 2, 3, and 4 weeks after tarp removal. We surveyed lettuce by randomly selecting 10 lettuce individuals in each plot (1 m x 2 m) and for each lettuce individual counting the number of leaves it contained and measuring the length and width of its largest leaf. <br> For more information, please refer to Kinnebrew et al. 2022 (https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2022.2146254) or contact Dr. Kinnebrew at eva.kinnebrew@colostate.edu. <br> Column Names and Explanations: <br> 1. Farm: the farm site (“A,” “B” or “C”) where the plot was located. All farms were located in Chittenden County, Vermont, USA <br> 2. Sampling: the sampling period, indicating the number of weeks after tarps were removed <br> 3. Date: date of sampling <br> 4. Treatment: indicates the treatment type (silage tarps, clear plastic tarps, or control) <br> 5. Plot_Replicate: the treatment replicate number on each farm (1-6 for each treatment on each farm) <br> 6. Plot_ID: the unique identifier for each spatial plot <br> 7. Lettuce_Replicate: the replicate number (1-10) of lettuce individuals that were measured in each plot <br> 8. Number_Leaves: the number of leaves on the lettuce individual <br> 9. Length_LargestLeaf: length in mm of the largest leaf on the measured lettuce individual <br> 10. Width_LargestLeaf: width in mm of the largest leaf on the measured lettuce individual
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21556554.v1
title: Tarp impacts on crop growth

description: These data demonstrate the impacts of tarps on crop (lettuce, <em>Lactuca sativa</em>) growth. We planted lettuce 1 week after tarp removal and surveyed lettuce growth 2, 3, and 4 weeks after tarp removal. We surveyed lettuce by randomly selecting 10 lettuce individuals in each plot (1 m x 2 m) and for each lettuce individual counting the number of leaves it contained and measuring the length and width of its largest leaf. <br> For more information, please refer to Kinnebrew et al. 2022 (https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2022.2146254) or contact Dr. Kinnebrew at eva.kinnebrew@colostate.edu. <br> Column Names and Explanations: <br> 1. Farm: the farm site (“A,” “B” or “C”) where the plot was located. All farms were located in Chittenden County, Vermont, USA <br> 2. Sampling: the sampling period, indicating the number of weeks after tarps were removed <br> 3. Date: date of sampling <br> 4. Treatment: indicates the treatment type (silage tarps, clear plastic tarps, or control) <br> 5. Plot_Replicate: the treatment replicate number on each farm (1-6 for each treatment on each farm) <br> 6. Plot_ID: the unique identifier for each spatial plot <br> 7. Lettuce_Replicate: the replicate number (1-10) of lettuce individuals that were measured in each plot <br> 8. Number_Leaves: the number of leaves on the lettuce individual <br> 9. Length_LargestLeaf: length in mm of the largest leaf on the measured lettuce individual <br> 10. Width_LargestLeaf: width in mm of the largest leaf on the measured lettuce individual
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21556593
title: Tarp impacts on crop yields

description: These data demonstrate the impact of tarps on crop yields (for lettuce, <em>Lactuca sativa</em>). We planted lettuce 1 week after tarp removal and harvested lettuce after 4 weeks of growth. At the time of harvest, we counted the number of lettuce individuals that grew within each plot (1 m x 2 m). We then harvested the lettuce and (after washing and drying it) measured the total weight (crop yield) of all lettuce individuals in each plot. For more information, please refer to Kinnebrew et al. 2022 (https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2022.2146254) or contact Dr. Kinnebrew at eva.kinnebrew@colostate.edu. <br> Column Names and Explanations: <br> 1. Farm: the farm site (“A,” “B” or “C”) where the plot was located. All farms were located in Chittenden County, Vermont, USA 2. Treatment: indicates the treatment type (silage tarps, clear plastic tarps, or control) 3. Plot_Replicate: the treatment replicate number on each farm (1-6 for each treatment on each farm) 4. Plot_ID: the unique identifier for each spatial plot 5. Number_lettuce: number of lettuce individuals in each plot 6. Total_Crop_Weight: weight in grams of all lettuce plants (cleaned and dried) within the plot boundaries. This weight is used to indicate crop yields.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21556593.v1
title: Tarp impacts on crop yields

description: These data demonstrate the impact of tarps on crop yields (for lettuce, <em>Lactuca sativa</em>). We planted lettuce 1 week after tarp removal and harvested lettuce after 4 weeks of growth. At the time of harvest, we counted the number of lettuce individuals that grew within each plot (1 m x 2 m). We then harvested the lettuce and (after washing and drying it) measured the total weight (crop yield) of all lettuce individuals in each plot. For more information, please refer to Kinnebrew et al. 2022 (https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2022.2146254) or contact Dr. Kinnebrew at eva.kinnebrew@colostate.edu. <br> Column Names and Explanations: <br> 1. Farm: the farm site (“A,” “B” or “C”) where the plot was located. All farms were located in Chittenden County, Vermont, USA 2. Treatment: indicates the treatment type (silage tarps, clear plastic tarps, or control) 3. Plot_Replicate: the treatment replicate number on each farm (1-6 for each treatment on each farm) 4. Plot_ID: the unique identifier for each spatial plot 5. Number_lettuce: number of lettuce individuals in each plot 6. Total_Crop_Weight: weight in grams of all lettuce plants (cleaned and dried) within the plot boundaries. This weight is used to indicate crop yields.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21559362
title: Additional file 1 of A multilevel examination of the association between COVID-19 restrictions and residence-to-crime distance

description: Additional file 1: Appendix. Additional model results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21559362.v1
title: Additional file 1 of A multilevel examination of the association between COVID-19 restrictions and residence-to-crime distance

description: Additional file 1: Appendix. Additional model results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21559368.v1
title: Additional file 1 of Venetoclax combined with low dose cytarabine compared to standard of care intensive chemotherapy for the treatment of favourable risk adult acute myeloid leukaemia (VICTOR): Study protocol for an international, open-label, multicentre, molecularly-guided randomised, phase II trial

description: Additional file 1: Supplementary Appendix 1. SPIRIT checklist for the VICTOR protocol A completed Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Intervention Trials (SPIRIT) checklist for the VICTOR protocol. Supplementary Appendix 2. WHO trial registration data set for the VICTOR trial The World Health Organization (WHO) trial registration data set for the VICTOR trial. Supplementary Appendix 3. VICTOR informed consent forms Exemplar informed consent and blood sample analysis consent form for the VICTOR trial. Supplementary Appendix 4. VICTOR patient information sheets Exemplar trial and blood sample analysis patient information sheets for VICTOR. Supplementary Appendix 5. VICTOR schedule of events Patient schedule of events for the VICTOR trial. Supplementary Appendix 6. Adverse event definitions Definitions of adverse events used for the VICTOR trial.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21559368
title: Additional file 1 of Venetoclax combined with low dose cytarabine compared to standard of care intensive chemotherapy for the treatment of favourable risk adult acute myeloid leukaemia (VICTOR): Study protocol for an international, open-label, multicentre, molecularly-guided randomised, phase II trial

description: Additional file 1: Supplementary Appendix 1. SPIRIT checklist for the VICTOR protocol A completed Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Intervention Trials (SPIRIT) checklist for the VICTOR protocol. Supplementary Appendix 2. WHO trial registration data set for the VICTOR trial The World Health Organization (WHO) trial registration data set for the VICTOR trial. Supplementary Appendix 3. VICTOR informed consent forms Exemplar informed consent and blood sample analysis consent form for the VICTOR trial. Supplementary Appendix 4. VICTOR patient information sheets Exemplar trial and blood sample analysis patient information sheets for VICTOR. Supplementary Appendix 5. VICTOR schedule of events Patient schedule of events for the VICTOR trial. Supplementary Appendix 6. Adverse event definitions Definitions of adverse events used for the VICTOR trial.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21559398
title: Additional file 1 of Failing the four-gamete test enables exact phasing: the Corners’ Algorithm

description: Additional file 1: Table S1. Non-recombination chromosomal regions in Iberian pigs detected by the Corners’ Algorithm.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21559398.v1
title: Additional file 1 of Failing the four-gamete test enables exact phasing: the Corners’ Algorithm

description: Additional file 1: Table S1. Non-recombination chromosomal regions in Iberian pigs detected by the Corners’ Algorithm.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21559413
title: Additional file 1 of Ewing sarcoma with very late metastasis in the skull: a case report

description: Additional file 1: Table S1. Summary of late local recurrence or metastasis of Ewing sarcoma family of tumors [see Addtional file 1]. LR local recurrence; M metastases; ANED alive no evidence of disease; AWED alive with evidence of disease.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21559413.v1
title: Additional file 1 of Ewing sarcoma with very late metastasis in the skull: a case report

description: Additional file 1: Table S1. Summary of late local recurrence or metastasis of Ewing sarcoma family of tumors [see Addtional file 1]. LR local recurrence; M metastases; ANED alive no evidence of disease; AWED alive with evidence of disease.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21559077
title: Tarp impacts on weed growth

description: These data demonstrate the impacts of tarps on weed growth. We surveyed weeds weekly for five weeks after tarp removal. Weeds were identified to species and we calculated species richness, Shannon’s diversity, and total cover (%) for each plot (plots were 1 m x 2 m). We additionally include the cover for specifically purslane, a weed species of interest. <br> For more information, please refer to Kinnebrew et al. 2022 (https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2022.2146254) or contact Dr. Kinnebrew at eva.kinnebrew@colostate.edu. <br> Column Names and Explanations: <br> 1. Farm: the farm site (“A,” “B” or “C”) where the plot was located. All farms were located in Chittenden County, Vermont, USA <br> 2. Sampling: the sampling period, indicating the number of weeks after tarps were removed <br> 3. Plot_Replicate: the treatment replicate number on each farm (1-6 for each treatment on each farm) <br> 4. Plot_ID: the unique identifier for each spatial plot <br> 5. SpRichness: species richness (number of weed species) <br> 6. Shannon: Shannon’s diversity of weed species <br> 7. Total_Cover: summed cover (%) within the plot area of all individual weed species’ cover (cover can exceed 100% when there are multiple layers of weed cover) <br> 8. Purslane_Cover: percent of only purslane cover within the plot area
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21559077.v1
title: Tarp impacts on weed growth

description: These data demonstrate the impacts of tarps on weed growth. We surveyed weeds weekly for five weeks after tarp removal. Weeds were identified to species and we calculated species richness, Shannon’s diversity, and total cover (%) for each plot (plots were 1 m x 2 m). We additionally include the cover for specifically purslane, a weed species of interest. <br> For more information, please refer to Kinnebrew et al. 2022 (https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2022.2146254) or contact Dr. Kinnebrew at eva.kinnebrew@colostate.edu. <br> Column Names and Explanations: <br> 1. Farm: the farm site (“A,” “B” or “C”) where the plot was located. All farms were located in Chittenden County, Vermont, USA <br> 2. Sampling: the sampling period, indicating the number of weeks after tarps were removed <br> 3. Plot_Replicate: the treatment replicate number on each farm (1-6 for each treatment on each farm) <br> 4. Plot_ID: the unique identifier for each spatial plot <br> 5. SpRichness: species richness (number of weed species) <br> 6. Shannon: Shannon’s diversity of weed species <br> 7. Total_Cover: summed cover (%) within the plot area of all individual weed species’ cover (cover can exceed 100% when there are multiple layers of weed cover) <br> 8. Purslane_Cover: percent of only purslane cover within the plot area
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21559422
title: Additional file 2 of Spanish version of the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale: translation and cross-cultural adaptation

description: Additional file 2.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21559422.v1
title: Additional file 2 of Spanish version of the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale: translation and cross-cultural adaptation

description: Additional file 2.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21559458
title: Additional file 1 of Impact of anticancer therapy on the quality of life of Sudanese patients with breast cancer at Khartoum oncology hospital

description: Additional file 1.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21559458.v1
title: Additional file 1 of Impact of anticancer therapy on the quality of life of Sudanese patients with breast cancer at Khartoum oncology hospital

description: Additional file 1.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21559464
title: Additional file 2 of Single sample pathway analysis in metabolomics: performance evaluation and application

description: Additional file 2. Excel spreadsheet containing results of statistical testing of benchmarking results. Mann Whitney U tests were performed for each pairwise combination of methods tested in the effect size simulation (corresponds to Fig. 5 in the main text). P-values were adjusted using Bonferroni FWER correction.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21559464.v1
title: Additional file 2 of Single sample pathway analysis in metabolomics: performance evaluation and application

description: Additional file 2. Excel spreadsheet containing results of statistical testing of benchmarking results. Mann Whitney U tests were performed for each pairwise combination of methods tested in the effect size simulation (corresponds to Fig. 5 in the main text). P-values were adjusted using Bonferroni FWER correction.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21559080
title: Tarp impacts on soil arthropods

description: These data show the impacts of tarps on aboveground and belowground arthropods (collected with pitfall traps and the Berlese funnel method, respectively). These data are a timeseries with 5 sampling times (before tarping, during tarping, and 1, 3, and 5 weeks after tarp removal). <br> We identified arthropods into morphospecies and calculates species richness, Shannon’s diversity, and total abundance. We also include the abundance of certain pest and natural enemy species. <br> For more information, please refer to Kinnebrew et al. 2022 (https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2022.2146254) or contact Dr. Kinnebrew at eva.kinnebrew@colostate.edu. <br> Column Names and Explanations: <br> 1. Farm: the farm site (“A,” “B” or “C”) where the plot was located. All farms were located in Chittenden County, Vermont, USA <br> 2. Treatment: indicates the treatment type (silage tarps, clear plastic tarps, or control) <br> 3. Plot_ID: the unique identifier for each spatial plot <br> 4. Sampling: the sampling period. “Pretarps” indicates sampling that occurred a week before tarp application, to capture baseline understanding of the arthropod community. “Tarps on” indicates a sampling that took place 3 weeks into tarp application. “Tarps off 1w,” “Tarps off 3w,” and “Tarps off 5w” indicates samplings that took place 1, 3, and 5 weeks after tarps were removed from the plots. <br> 5. Pitfall_SpRichness: species richness (specifically the number of morphospecies) of arthropods collected with pitfall traps <br> 6. Pitfall_Shannons: Shannon’s diversity of arthropod morphospecies collected with pitfall traps <br> 7. Pitfall_TotalOrgs: total number of individuals collected with pitfall traps <br> 8. Berlese_SpRichness: species richness (specifically the number of morphospecies) of arthropods collected with the Berlese funnel method <br> 9. Berlese_Shannons: Shannon’s diversity of arthropod morphospecies collected with the Berlese funnel method <br> 10. Berlese_TotalOrgs: total number of individuals collected with the Berlese funnel method <br> 11. Chrysomelidae_Abundance: abundance (number of individuals) per plot in the Chrysomelidae family (flea beetles). Organisms captured with pitfall traps. <br> 12. Aphididae_Abundance: abundance (number of individuals) per plot in the Aphididae family (aphids). Organisms captured with pitfall traps. <br> 13. Carabidae_Abundance: abundance (number of individuals) per plot in the Carabidae family (ground beetles). Organisms captured with pitfall traps. <br> 14. Elateridae_Abundance: abundance (number of individuals) per plot in the Elateridae family (click beetles). Organisms captured with pitfall traps. <br> 15. Lycosidae_Abundance: abundance (number of individuals) per plot in the Lycosidae family (wolf spiders). Organisms captured with pitfall traps. <br> 16. Curculionidae_Abundance: abundance (number of individuals) per plot in the Curculionidae family (weevils). Organisms captured with pitfall traps.