DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.29436923.v1
title: Nepal Climate Adaptation Document Analysis - Paper

description: Nepal, a nation acutely vulnerable to climate change impacts due to its fragile mountain ecosystems, climate-sensitive livelihoods, and socio-economic factors, has developed a comprehensive suite of policies, plans, and assessments to guide its adaptation efforts. This report analyzes the key components of Nepal's climate change adaptation documentation landscape, evaluating national frameworks, local implementation mechanisms, climate risk assessments, disaster risk reduction integration, thematic priorities, and the evolution of vulnerability understanding.Key national frameworks, including the National Adaptation Plan (NAP 2023-2050), the National Climate Change Policy (NCCC Policy 2019), and the Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC 2020), demonstrate significant ambition. They set long-term goals like net-zero emissions by 2050, outline comprehensive sectoral strategies, and aim to integrate adaptation into national development planning. However, this ambition is counterbalanced by a heavy reliance on external financing and acknowledged institutional capacity constraints, posing challenges for implementation. While policy documents show clear intent for coherence, practical integration across sectors and governance levels remains difficult.Nepal's adaptation strategy has matured significantly, evolving from the National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA 2010), which focused on immediate, project-based needs, to the current NAP, which adopts a strategic, long-term, and integrated programmatic approach. This evolution reflects learning and alignment with international best practices but also brings increased complexity and coordination demands.The translation of national policies to local action relies heavily on frameworks like the Local Adaptation Plans for Action (LAPA) Framework (2011) and emerging integrated approaches like Local Disaster and Climate Resilience Plans (LDCRPs). Nepal pioneered decentralized adaptation planning, but persistent local capacity gaps and funding limitations hinder effective implementation. Strengthening vertical integration between national and local levels is critical.Major reports confirm accelerating climate trends, including significant warming (especially at higher altitudes) and increased precipitation extremes. Vulnerability and Risk Assessments (VRAs) conducted for the NAP provide systematic, indicator-based analyses confirming high vulnerability across sectors like agriculture, water resources, health, and infrastructure, disproportionately affecting marginalized groups. The World Bank's Country Climate and Development Report (CCDR) underscores climate change as a fundamental development challenge threatening economic growth and poverty reduction. Despite methodological advances in VRA, data gaps persist, particularly for local-level planning.Efforts to integrate Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) and Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) are evident in policy shifts (DRRM Act 2017, DRRNSPA 2018-2030) and integrated planning frameworks (LDCRP). However, implementation faces challenges, including a lingering focus on response, unclear institutional roles under federalism, potential asymmetry favouring DRR structures locally, and capacity constraints.Thematic analyses reveal specific vulnerabilities and adaptation needs. Climate change poses significant risks to public health through direct impacts (heat stress, disease vectors) and indirect pathways (malnutrition). Indigenous and Local Knowledge (ILK) is recognized as a valuable asset for adaptation but has limitations against unprecedented change, necessitating integration with scientific approaches. Waste management, despite clear climate links (mitigation and adaptation), appears relatively under-integrated into climate strategies. Environmental protection legislation (EPA 2019) provides a legal basis for adaptation actions but faces implementation challenges.The conceptualization of vulnerability has evolved from narrative and asset-based approaches in early studies (NCVST 2010, World Bank 2010) to the systematic, indicator-based IPCC risk framework used in recent VRAs, enabling more targeted planning.Overall, Nepal possesses a comprehensive, albeit potentially fragmented, adaptation documentation landscape. It provides a strong foundation for action, but the critical challenge lies in moving from planning to effective, widespread, and sustained implementation, monitoring, and financing across all governance levels, requiring strengthened coordination, capacity building, and robust vertical integration.<br>