DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14236877
title: Development of a HPLC Method for Improved Detection and Analysis in Glycerol Electrooxidation Studies

description: # Dataset of "Development of a HPLC Method for Improved Detection and Analysis in Glycerol Electrooxidation Studies"

---

## GENERAL INFORMATION----------------------

1. Dataset title: "Development of a HPLC Method for Improved Detection and Analysis in Glycerol Electrooxidation Studies"

2. Authorship:      Name: Eva Ng      Institution: Institute of Advanced Materials (INAM), Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló, Spain    ORCID: 0009-0003-4184-5579

    Name: Camilo A. Mesa    Institution: Institute of Advanced Materials (INAM), Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló, Spain    ORCID: 0000-0002-8450-2563

    Name: Sixto Giménez    Institution: Institute of Advanced Materials (INAM), Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló, Spain    Email: <sjulia@uji.es>     ORCID: 0000-0002-4522-3174

## FILE DESCRIPTION--------------### Figure 1- Fig1a.txt : Chromatogram obtained from the analysis of the analytical standards containing glycerol electrooxidation products previously reported. - Fig1b.txt : Chromatogram obtained from the analysis of the analytical standards containing glycerol electrooxidation products in this work.

### Figure 2- Fig2a.txt : Referential chromatograms from analytical standards that can be produced during Glycerol Electrooxidation Reaction (GEOR). Reported method.- Fig2b.txt : Referential chromatograms from analytical standards that can be produced during Glycerol Electrooxidation Reaction (GEOR). New developed method.

### Figure 3- Fig3a.txt : Calibration curve for oxalic acid analytical standard from 0.1 mM to 5 mM and its standard deviation. Each point was measured by triplicate.- Fig3b.txt : Calibration curve for tartronic acid analytical standard from 0.1 mM to 5 mM and its standard deviation. Each point was measured by triplicate.- Fig3c.txt : Calibration curve for L-sodium glycerate analytical standard from 0.1 mM to 5 mM and its standard deviation. Each point was measured by triplicate.- Fig3d.txt : Calibration curve for glycolic acid analytical standard from 0.1 mM to 5 mM and its standard deviation. Each point was measured by triplicate.- Fig3e.txt : Calibration curve for formic acid analytical standard from 0.1 mM to 5 mM and its standard deviation. Each point was measured by triplicate.- Fig3f.txt : Calibration curve for dihydroxyacetone analytical standard from 0.1 mM to 5 mM and its standard deviation. Each point was measured by triplicate.- Fig3g.txt : Calibration curve for glyceraldehyde analytical standard from 0.1 mM to 5 mM and its standard deviation. Each point was measured by triplicate.- Fig3h.txt : Calibration curve for glycerol analytical standard from 0.1 mM to 5 mM and its standard deviation. Each point was measured by triplicate.

### Figure 4- Fig4.txt : Glyceraldehyde standard concentrations as a function of different wavelengths. Each measurement was performed by triplicate and it is shown with its standard deviation.

### Figure 5- Fig5.txt : Experimental concentrations at different calibration levels for glyceraldehyde and formic acid quantification with their standard deviation. Each measurement was performed by triplicate.

### Figure 6-Fig6a.txt : Chromatograms obtained from a potentiostatic measurement performed at 1.62 V vs RHE in a solution containing LiOH 0.1 M and glycerol 50 mM and analytical standards as a reference. -Fig6b.txt : Product distribution represented in terms of Faradaic Efficiency (FE). The percentages above the bars represent the total (FE) while inside the bars, they refer to the different products.