DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17682067
title: The Relative Framework: A Philosophical Lens
title: The Knowledge Acquisition Paradox
title: Exploring Time Dimensions in the Knowledge Acquisition Paradox
title: Dimensional Constraints and Observer Limitations
title: The Cognitive Compression Framework: A Hierarchy of Concise Self-Awareness Vol 1 Paper 2
title: The Entanglement Model of Emergent Experience
title: The Relativity of Life's Meaning: A Multifaceted Approach
title: Temporal Entanglement: The Clock as a Distorting Lens of Consciousness
title: The Illusion of Choice Vol 1 Paper 1
title: Responsibility Reconsidered Within The Illusion Of Choice Vol 1 Paper 2.pdf
title: Emotional Protocols and Reactive Structures The Bridge Between Illusion and Morality Vol 1 Paper 3 .pdf
title: Morality and Responsibility as Emergent Narrative In The Illusion Of Choice Vol 1 Paper 4.pdf
title: Addendum Reconciling Determinism and Meaning in The Relative Framework
title: Intuition Within the Cognitive Compression Framework Vol 1 Paper 2.pdf
title: Memory, Perspective, and the End of Self An Extension of the Cognitive Compression Framework Vol 1 Paper 3.pdf
title: Looking Through The Lens Of The Relative Framework
title: Illusion of Choice: The Architecture of Self Vol 1 Paper 5
title: The Relative Framework Official Lexicon

description: The Relative Framework is my life's work. 20 years of philosophical questioning and understanding. It is a unified philosophical system that explores the structural limits of knowledge, the emergence of self-awareness, and the entangled nature of meaning and perception. Beginning with the Knowledge Acquisition Paradox and culminating in a theory of existential relativity. Together, they form a recursive model of epistemology, cognition, and ontology grounded in limitation, emergence, and systemic interaction. The framework does not seek to finalize answers, but to clarify the boundaries through which understanding unfolds.

This body of work reflects its own emergence. Apparent overlaps or recursions are not oversights, but structural manifestations of the very epistemic constraints the framework explores. No attempt has been made to disguise the process through post hoc polish. Each paper is a stage of compression, capturing the mind’s recursive refinement under cognitive and temporal limitation.

Each paper within the series is labelled as “Vol. 1” to reflect their shared grounding in a single conceptual architecture. These are not separate volumes, but distinct lines of inquiry within the same philosophical body. Where extensions are made (e.g., continuations), they are marked as “Paper 1,” “Paper 2,” etc., under the same unified volume.

Philpapers:

https://philpeople.org/profiles/dean-tyldesley

Internet Archive:

https://archive.org/details/@dean_tyldesley/uploads

Google Scholar:

https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=dAK4zZgAAAAJ

OSF:

https://osf.io/nf243/

Academia.edu:

https://independent.academia.edu/DeanTyldesley

"The illusion of freedom is not a lie we tell ourselves, It’s the cognitive condition that allows deterministic systems to orient, reflect, and endure."

“We are not the arbiters of truth, but the narrators of validity”

Dean Tyldesley

Email: tyldesley@yahoo.com

ORCID: 0009-0006-6041-352X

Web Of Science: ResearcherIDOYD-9537-2025