cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517715.v1
title: Appendix B. A table showing damage causal agents and host type conversions for bark beetle–host species combinations missing some data for the western conterminous U.S. grids.

description: A table showing damage causal agents and host type conversions for bark beetle–host species combinations missing some data for the western conterminous U.S. grids.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517712
title: Appendix C. A table summarizing additional information about the image classifications performed in the three study locations.

description: A table summarizing additional information about the image classifications performed in the three study locations.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517712.v1
title: Appendix C. A table summarizing additional information about the image classifications performed in the three study locations.

description: A table summarizing additional information about the image classifications performed in the three study locations.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517709
title: Appendix D. A figure depicting the relative frequency distribution of cumulative mortality area (all bark beetle species, all years) for the western conterminous U.S. and British Columbia data sets (cells with mortality area greater than 0).

description: A figure depicting the relative frequency distribution of cumulative mortality area (all bark beetle species, all years) for the western conterminous U.S. and British Columbia data sets (cells with mortality area greater than 0).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517709.v1
title: Appendix D. A figure depicting the relative frequency distribution of cumulative mortality area (all bark beetle species, all years) for the western conterminous U.S. and British Columbia data sets (cells with mortality area greater than 0).

description: A figure depicting the relative frequency distribution of cumulative mortality area (all bark beetle species, all years) for the western conterminous U.S. and British Columbia data sets (cells with mortality area greater than 0).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517706
title: Appendix E. A figure depicting the affected area for each mortality severity class (Table 1) in British Columbia.

description: A figure depicting the affected area for each mortality severity class (Table 1) in British Columbia.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517706.v1
title: Appendix E. A figure depicting the affected area for each mortality severity class (Table 1) in British Columbia.

description: A figure depicting the affected area for each mortality severity class (Table 1) in British Columbia.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517703
title: Appendix F. A table listing the number of killed trees, mortality area, and percentage of total killed trees by bark beetle species and host type and summed from 1997 through 2010 (United States only).

description: A table listing the number of killed trees, mortality area, and percentage of total killed trees by bark beetle species and host type and summed from 1997 through 2010 (United States only).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517700
title: Appendix A. Specific leaf area (SLA; cm2·g-1·dry mass) values for the genotypes used in this study.

description: Specific leaf area (SLA; cm2·g-1·dry mass) values for the genotypes used in this study.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517700.v1
title: Appendix A. Specific leaf area (SLA; cm2·g-1·dry mass) values for the genotypes used in this study.

description: Specific leaf area (SLA; cm2·g-1·dry mass) values for the genotypes used in this study.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517697
title: Appendix B. Mean emission rates (nmol·m-2·s-1) of isoprene, methanol, and monoterpenes from new, young, mature, and old leaves from each of 30 genotypes.

description: Mean emission rates (nmol·m-2·s-1) of isoprene, methanol, and monoterpenes from new, young, mature, and old leaves from each of 30 genotypes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517694
title: Appendix A. A figure showing the major vegetation ecosystem types in the study region.

description: A figure showing the major vegetation ecosystem types in the study region.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517694.v1
title: Appendix A. A figure showing the major vegetation ecosystem types in the study region.

description: A figure showing the major vegetation ecosystem types in the study region.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517691
title: Appendix B. Two box-and-whisker-plot figures showing the range of temperature, precipitation, and elevation found in the case-study region.

description: Two box-and-whisker-plot figures showing the range of temperature, precipitation, and elevation found in the case-study region.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517691.v1
title: Appendix B. Two box-and-whisker-plot figures showing the range of temperature, precipitation, and elevation found in the case-study region.

description: Two box-and-whisker-plot figures showing the range of temperature, precipitation, and elevation found in the case-study region.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517688
title: Appendix C. A figure showing the geographic distribution of the vascular plant survey plots.

description: A figure showing the geographic distribution of the vascular plant survey plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517688.v1
title: Appendix C. A figure showing the geographic distribution of the vascular plant survey plots.

description: A figure showing the geographic distribution of the vascular plant survey plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517685
title: Appendix D. A histogram of the plots in relation to their estimated greenspot index values. A total of 5099 survey plots fell within native vegatation cover.

description: A histogram of the plots in relation to their estimated greenspot index values. A total of 5099 survey plots fell within native vegatation cover.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517685.v1
title: Appendix D. A histogram of the plots in relation to their estimated greenspot index values. A total of 5099 survey plots fell within native vegatation cover.

description: A histogram of the plots in relation to their estimated greenspot index values. A total of 5099 survey plots fell within native vegatation cover.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517682
title: Appendix E. A table showing for each greenspot index percentile threshold, the number of grid cells from where the vascular plant survey plots are located, the number of plots, and the sampling proportion.

description: A table showing for each greenspot index percentile threshold, the number of grid cells from where the vascular plant survey plots are located, the number of plots, and the sampling proportion.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517682.v1
title: Appendix E. A table showing for each greenspot index percentile threshold, the number of grid cells from where the vascular plant survey plots are located, the number of plots, and the sampling proportion.

description: A table showing for each greenspot index percentile threshold, the number of grid cells from where the vascular plant survey plots are located, the number of plots, and the sampling proportion.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517679
title: Appendix F. A table listing the geographic coordinates of the selected cells used in Fig. 3 to show the greenspot index time series for the dry sclerophyll coast/montane ecosystem type.

description: A table listing the geographic coordinates of the selected cells used in Fig. 3 to show the greenspot index time series for the dry sclerophyll coast/montane ecosystem type.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517679.v1
title: Appendix F. A table listing the geographic coordinates of the selected cells used in Fig. 3 to show the greenspot index time series for the dry sclerophyll coast/montane ecosystem type.

description: A table listing the geographic coordinates of the selected cells used in Fig. 3 to show the greenspot index time series for the dry sclerophyll coast/montane ecosystem type.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517676
title: Appendix G. Five figures showing the fPAR time-series values for a set of grid cells for a selection of vegetation ecosystem types and greenspot thresholds. "No GT" indicates that the treshold exceeds 95%.

description: Five figures showing the fPAR time-series values for a set of grid cells for a selection of vegetation ecosystem types and greenspot thresholds. "No GT" indicates that the treshold exceeds 95%.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517676.v1
title: Appendix G. Five figures showing the fPAR time-series values for a set of grid cells for a selection of vegetation ecosystem types and greenspot thresholds. "No GT" indicates that the treshold exceeds 95%.

description: Five figures showing the fPAR time-series values for a set of grid cells for a selection of vegetation ecosystem types and greenspot thresholds. "No GT" indicates that the treshold exceeds 95%.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517673
title: Appendix H. Eight figures showing the distribution of ecosystem greenspot index values in relation to the aspect, slope, and topographic position of the corresponding grid cell.

description: Eight figures showing the distribution of ecosystem greenspot index values in relation to the aspect, slope, and topographic position of the corresponding grid cell.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517673.v1
title: Appendix H. Eight figures showing the distribution of ecosystem greenspot index values in relation to the aspect, slope, and topographic position of the corresponding grid cell.

description: Eight figures showing the distribution of ecosystem greenspot index values in relation to the aspect, slope, and topographic position of the corresponding grid cell.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517670
title: Appendix I. Two maps depicting the geographic variation in species composition as represented by the three-dimensional PCA analysis of the generalized dissimilarity modeling (GDM) modeling of 4,268 vascular plant species in the case study region.

description: Two maps depicting the geographic variation in species composition as represented by the three-dimensional PCA analysis of the generalized dissimilarity modeling (GDM) modeling of 4,268 vascular plant species in the case study region.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517670.v1
title: Appendix I. Two maps depicting the geographic variation in species composition as represented by the three-dimensional PCA analysis of the generalized dissimilarity modeling (GDM) modeling of 4,268 vascular plant species in the case study region.

description: Two maps depicting the geographic variation in species composition as represented by the three-dimensional PCA analysis of the generalized dissimilarity modeling (GDM) modeling of 4,268 vascular plant species in the case study region.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517667
title: Supplement 1. KMZ versions of the maps presented in Figs. 2 and 4, viewable in Google Earth.

description: File List Eco_Greenspots.kmz (md5: eb203e80d3bbcb6fc778cd7e3ed491b6) Fire_Footprint.kmz (md5: f3ebcedec63e6d23b2a15df5f0a374f1) DescriptionEco_Greenspots.kmz - Ecosystem greenspot index (percentiles) for the case study region derived from fPAR time series data set. Analysis is restricted to areas with native vegetation cover. This is the same map as presented in Fig. 2 but provided here in KMZ format viewable in Google Earth. Fire_Footprint.kmz - Fire affected areas in the case study region revealed by the image ratio analyses of the fPAR time-series. This is the same map given in Fig. 4 but provided here in KMZ format viewable in Google Earth.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517667.v1
title: Supplement 1. KMZ versions of the maps presented in Figs. 2 and 4, viewable in Google Earth.

description: File List Eco_Greenspots.kmz (md5: eb203e80d3bbcb6fc778cd7e3ed491b6) Fire_Footprint.kmz (md5: f3ebcedec63e6d23b2a15df5f0a374f1) DescriptionEco_Greenspots.kmz - Ecosystem greenspot index (percentiles) for the case study region derived from fPAR time series data set. Analysis is restricted to areas with native vegetation cover. This is the same map as presented in Fig. 2 but provided here in KMZ format viewable in Google Earth. Fire_Footprint.kmz - Fire affected areas in the case study region revealed by the image ratio analyses of the fPAR time-series. This is the same map given in Fig. 4 but provided here in KMZ format viewable in Google Earth.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517664
title: Appendix A. Candidate multinomial logistic regression (mlogit) models of mosquito activity on the Bathurst caribou post-calving and summer range, 2007–2009. We also report number of parameters (K), log-likelihood, Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) scores, differences in AICc scores (ΔAICc), and AICc weights (w) for models within the temporal, weather, habitat, and combination themes.

description: Candidate multinomial logistic regression (mlogit) models of mosquito activity on the Bathurst caribou post-calving and summer range, 2007–2009. We also report number of parameters (K), log-likelihood, Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) scores, differences in AICc scores (ΔAICc), and AICc weights (w) for models within the temporal, weather, habitat, and combination themes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517664.v1
title: Appendix A. Candidate multinomial logistic regression (mlogit) models of mosquito activity on the Bathurst caribou post-calving and summer range, 2007–2009. We also report number of parameters (K), log-likelihood, Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) scores, differences in AICc scores (ΔAICc), and AICc weights (w) for models within the temporal, weather, habitat, and combination themes.

description: Candidate multinomial logistic regression (mlogit) models of mosquito activity on the Bathurst caribou post-calving and summer range, 2007–2009. We also report number of parameters (K), log-likelihood, Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) scores, differences in AICc scores (ΔAICc), and AICc weights (w) for models within the temporal, weather, habitat, and combination themes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517661
title: Appendix B. Candidate multinomial logistic regression (mlogit) models of black fly activity on the Bathurst caribou post-calving and summer range, 2007–2009. We also report number of parameters (K), log-likelihood, Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) scores, differences in AICc scores (ΔAICc), and AICc weights (w) for models within the temporal, weather, habitat, and combination themes.

description: Candidate multinomial logistic regression (mlogit) models of black fly activity on the Bathurst caribou post-calving and summer range, 2007–2009. We also report number of parameters (K), log-likelihood, Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) scores, differences in AICc scores (ΔAICc), and AICc weights (w) for models within the temporal, weather, habitat, and combination themes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517661.v1
title: Appendix B. Candidate multinomial logistic regression (mlogit) models of black fly activity on the Bathurst caribou post-calving and summer range, 2007–2009. We also report number of parameters (K), log-likelihood, Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) scores, differences in AICc scores (ΔAICc), and AICc weights (w) for models within the temporal, weather, habitat, and combination themes.

description: Candidate multinomial logistic regression (mlogit) models of black fly activity on the Bathurst caribou post-calving and summer range, 2007–2009. We also report number of parameters (K), log-likelihood, Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) scores, differences in AICc scores (ΔAICc), and AICc weights (w) for models within the temporal, weather, habitat, and combination themes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517658
title: Appendix C. Candidate logistic regression models of oestrid fly presence on the Bathurst caribou post-calving and summer range, 2007–2009. We also report number of parameters (K), log-likelihood, Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) scores; differences in AICc scores (ΔAICc), AICc weights (w), and area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC) calculated using the training data set, for models within the temporal, weather, habitat, and combination themes.

description: Candidate logistic regression models of oestrid fly presence on the Bathurst caribou post-calving and summer range, 2007–2009. We also report number of parameters (K), log-likelihood, Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) scores; differences in AICc scores (ΔAICc), AICc weights (w), and area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC) calculated using the training data set, for models within the temporal, weather, habitat, and combination themes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517658.v1
title: Appendix C. Candidate logistic regression models of oestrid fly presence on the Bathurst caribou post-calving and summer range, 2007–2009. We also report number of parameters (K), log-likelihood, Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) scores; differences in AICc scores (ΔAICc), AICc weights (w), and area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC) calculated using the training data set, for models within the temporal, weather, habitat, and combination themes.

description: Candidate logistic regression models of oestrid fly presence on the Bathurst caribou post-calving and summer range, 2007–2009. We also report number of parameters (K), log-likelihood, Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) scores; differences in AICc scores (ΔAICc), AICc weights (w), and area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC) calculated using the training data set, for models within the temporal, weather, habitat, and combination themes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517655
title: Appendix D. Coefficients (β) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from multinomial logistic regression (mlogit) models of mosquito and black fly activity and from logistic regression model of oestrid presence on the Bathurst caribou post-calving and summer range, Northwest Territories and Nunavut, Canada. Coefficients presented are from models selected from the full model sets. Coefficients for growing degree-days (gdd2), light, easting, and northing are scaled by a factor of 1000.

description: Coefficients (β) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from multinomial logistic regression (mlogit) models of mosquito and black fly activity and from logistic regression model of oestrid presence on the Bathurst caribou post-calving and summer range, Northwest Territories and Nunavut, Canada. Coefficients presented are from models selected from the full model sets. Coefficients for growing degree-days (gdd2), light, easting, and northing are scaled by a factor of 1000.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517652
title: Appendix A. Detailed results of statistical analyses.

description: Detailed results of statistical analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517652.v1
title: Appendix A. Detailed results of statistical analyses.

description: Detailed results of statistical analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517649
title: Appendix A. Summaries of MANOVA and restricted maximum likelihood (REML) analyses of several traits measured on individual plants level.

description: Summaries of MANOVA and restricted maximum likelihood (REML) analyses of several traits measured on individual plants level.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517649.v1
title: Appendix A. Summaries of MANOVA and restricted maximum likelihood (REML) analyses of several traits measured on individual plants level.

description: Summaries of MANOVA and restricted maximum likelihood (REML) analyses of several traits measured on individual plants level.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517646
title: Appendix B. Summaries of MANOVA and restricted maximum likelihood (REML) analyses of several traits measured at the plot level.

description: Summaries of MANOVA and restricted maximum likelihood (REML) analyses of several traits measured at the plot level.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517646.v1
title: Appendix B. Summaries of MANOVA and restricted maximum likelihood (REML) analyses of several traits measured at the plot level.

description: Summaries of MANOVA and restricted maximum likelihood (REML) analyses of several traits measured at the plot level.
DOI: 10.7931/8sa9-zh19
title: NZGBS 2018 | trend analysis methods
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517643
title: Appendix A. Results on mean and 95% confidence interval of regression coefficients for environmental and host abundance variables in relation to tick and chigger loads on Apodemus agrarius.

description: Results on mean and 95% confidence interval of regression coefficients for environmental and host abundance variables in relation to tick and chigger loads on Apodemus agrarius.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517640
title: Appendix A. Detailed information about the study sites (locations, crayfish densities, environmental conditions, and interannual variability).

description: Detailed information about the study sites (locations, crayfish densities, environmental conditions, and interannual variability).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517640.v1
title: Appendix A. Detailed information about the study sites (locations, crayfish densities, environmental conditions, and interannual variability).

description: Detailed information about the study sites (locations, crayfish densities, environmental conditions, and interannual variability).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517637
title: Appendix A. Tables outlining the number of species and sites included in each of the phylum and refined taxonomic groupings, and similarity indices for pairwise comparisons of refined taxonomic groups at the resolution of 2 and 16 clusters.

description: Tables outlining the number of species and sites included in each of the phylum and refined taxonomic groupings, and similarity indices for pairwise comparisons of refined taxonomic groups at the resolution of 2 and 16 clusters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517634
title: Appendix B. Maps of the cluster allocation at each site when the number of clusters was set at 16, for each of the 12 refined taxonomic groups.

description: Maps of the cluster allocation at each site when the number of clusters was set at 16, for each of the 12 refined taxonomic groups.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517634.v1
title: Appendix B. Maps of the cluster allocation at each site when the number of clusters was set at 16, for each of the 12 refined taxonomic groups.

description: Maps of the cluster allocation at each site when the number of clusters was set at 16, for each of the 12 refined taxonomic groups.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517631
title: Appendix C. Maps of the cluster allocation at each site when the number of clusters was set at two, for each of the 12 refined taxonomic groups.

description: Maps of the cluster allocation at each site when the number of clusters was set at two, for each of the 12 refined taxonomic groups.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517631.v1
title: Appendix C. Maps of the cluster allocation at each site when the number of clusters was set at two, for each of the 12 refined taxonomic groups.

description: Maps of the cluster allocation at each site when the number of clusters was set at two, for each of the 12 refined taxonomic groups.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517628
title: Appendix A. Data sources used for digital elevation models (DEM), sediment and tectonic vertical movement rates, eelgrass habitat distributions, and eelgrass elevation limits and shoot lengths.

description: Data sources used for digital elevation models (DEM), sediment and tectonic vertical movement rates, eelgrass habitat distributions, and eelgrass elevation limits and shoot lengths.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517628.v1
title: Appendix A. Data sources used for digital elevation models (DEM), sediment and tectonic vertical movement rates, eelgrass habitat distributions, and eelgrass elevation limits and shoot lengths.

description: Data sources used for digital elevation models (DEM), sediment and tectonic vertical movement rates, eelgrass habitat distributions, and eelgrass elevation limits and shoot lengths.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3517625
title: Appendix A. Color version of Fig. 3 showing bird species and the corresponding fruits and seed sizes that each bird is known to disperse).

description: Color version of Fig. 3 showing bird species and the corresponding fruits and seed sizes that each bird is known to disperse).