DOI: 10.25549/independent-ouc11399kl3o
title: 3. Gates v. Police Commission 71. Respondent's exhibits 14-53

description: 71: Attorneys for respondents. Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. Daryl F. Gates, petitioner, vs. Board of Police Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles, municipal board, and the City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation, respondents. Southern Christian Leadership Conference of Greater Los Angeles; Maxine Waters; Mark Ridley-Thomas; Community Unity Center; Danny Bakewell, Sr., Joyce Fiske; John W. Mack, proposed intervenors. Case no. BS 006789. Respondents' exhibits 14 - 53. PART OF A SERIES: The series consists of miscellaneous source materials that were collected and analyzed over the course of the Independent Commission's investigation. Included are the following: article clippings pertaining to the Rodney King incident; legal materials related to the Gates v. Board of Los Angeles Police Commissioners case, including appellate documents, court transcripts, preliminary injunctions, and briefs; black-and-white photographs; essays and articles related to police misconduct; issues of The Thin Blue Line, the Los Angeles Police Protective League's monthly publication, and Perspectives on Policing, a newsletter published by the United States Department of Justice; materials regarding policing issues in other major United States cities, including commission reports and Pate and Hamilton's book The Big Six: Policing America's Largest Cities; supplemental materials and appendices to the Independent Commission's report; requests for copies of the Commission report; transcripts from public hearings conducted by members of the Commission; and instructional materials related to the Video Incident Capture System, a video camera system that provides video and audio records of police officers' activities while on patrol.1. Cover sheet; Respondent's exhibits 14-53, 1991-04-252. 14. Moore, memo, 1947-09-19, to Donner3. 15. Wesson, letter, 1972-02-24, to Phillips4. 16. Farrell, letter, 1973-07-25, to Lane & Caughlin5. 17. Wells, memo, 1974-05-22, to file6. 18. Doherty, letter, 1975-04-30, to Bradley7. 19. Doherty, letter, 1975-08-27, to Bradley8. 20. Pearson, letter, 1978-08-11, to Piper9. 21. Doherty, memo, 1979-02-23, to Nichols10. 22. Doherty, letter, 1979-03-02, to Thompson11. 23. Doherty, letter, 1979-05-07, to Reiner12. 24. Doherty, letter, 1980-08-07, to Reiner13. 25. Doherty, letter, 1982-03-16, to Hahn14. 26. Echeverria, letter, 1984-09-28, to Schlei15. 27 (pp. 1-2). Alpern, letter, 1986-04-23, to LA City Council16. 27 (p. 3). Glusker, letter, 1986-04-21, to Netzer17. 27 (pp. 4-5). US Hotel Properties Corp., v. LA City Planning Commission. Stipulation and order thereon, 1986-04-2118. 28. Merkin, letter, 1988-07-26, to Comrie19. 29 (p. 1). Merkin, letter, 1989-05-12, to Ostrov20. 29 (p. 2-8). Charter amendment litigation settlement agreement, 1983; Merkin, Ostrov & Marr representers, 1989-05-09 - 1989-05-1221. 30. Hilker, letter, 1989-09-13, to Nichols22. 31 (pp. 1-4). Alperin, letter, 1989-12-13, to Bradley23. 31 (pp. 5-6). Bradley, letter, 1989-12-06, to Hahn24. 32. Hilker, letter, 1990-06-11, to Flores25. 33. Alperin, letter, 1990-07-02, to LA City Council