cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520154.v1
title: Appendix B. Supporting figures displaying examples of species’ weekly frequency of occurrence and weekly stewardship plots; weekly occurrence centroids and average breeding season probability of occurrence on GAP status 2 lands; weekly occurrence centroids and average breeding season probability of occurrence on GAP status 3 lands; and weekly elevation associations and maximum seasonal range size.

description: Supporting figures displaying examples of species’ weekly frequency of occurrence and weekly stewardship plots; weekly occurrence centroids and average breeding season probability of occurrence on GAP status 2 lands; weekly occurrence centroids and average breeding season probability of occurrence on GAP status 3 lands; and weekly elevation associations and maximum seasonal range size.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520151
title: Appendix C. The 308 species considered in the study and their individual results.

description: The 308 species considered in the study and their individual results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520151.v1
title: Appendix C. The 308 species considered in the study and their individual results.

description: The 308 species considered in the study and their individual results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520148
title: Appendix D. Results of the conservation status permutation tests.

description: Results of the conservation status permutation tests.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520148.v1
title: Appendix D. Results of the conservation status permutation tests.

description: Results of the conservation status permutation tests.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520145
title: Appendix A. Jack-knife analyses of importance of eco-geographic predictors for ungulates on the Tibetan Plateau.

description: Jack-knife analyses of importance of eco-geographic predictors for ungulates on the Tibetan Plateau.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520142
title: Appendix B. Occurrence records, Jack-knife analysis result, and distributional predictions of single species for the current, 2020, 2050, and 2080 under the full and zero dispersal hypotheses.

description: Occurrence records, Jack-knife analysis result, and distributional predictions of single species for the current, 2020, 2050, and 2080 under the full and zero dispersal hypotheses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520142.v1
title: Appendix B. Occurrence records, Jack-knife analysis result, and distributional predictions of single species for the current, 2020, 2050, and 2080 under the full and zero dispersal hypotheses.

description: Occurrence records, Jack-knife analysis result, and distributional predictions of single species for the current, 2020, 2050, and 2080 under the full and zero dispersal hypotheses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520139
title: Appendix C. Mean annual temperature vs. annual precipitation at all the grid cells on the Tibetan Plateau for the current, 2020, 2050, and 2080.

description: Mean annual temperature vs. annual precipitation at all the grid cells on the Tibetan Plateau for the current, 2020, 2050, and 2080.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520139.v1
title: Appendix C. Mean annual temperature vs. annual precipitation at all the grid cells on the Tibetan Plateau for the current, 2020, 2050, and 2080.

description: Mean annual temperature vs. annual precipitation at all the grid cells on the Tibetan Plateau for the current, 2020, 2050, and 2080.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520136
title: Appendix D. Range centroid shifts of ungulates on the Tibetan Plateau projected for 2020, 2050, and 2080 under climate change, based on the full dispersal assumption.

description: Range centroid shifts of ungulates on the Tibetan Plateau projected for 2020, 2050, and 2080 under climate change, based on the full dispersal assumption.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520133
title: Appendix A. Step-by-step methodology for creating scale-mismatch vs. resilience plots.

description: Step-by-step methodology for creating scale-mismatch vs. resilience plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520130
title: Appendix A. Tables showing research site descriptions, weather station summaries, model parameters and statistics, and figures showing a map of study sites and weather stations and sampling protocol.

description: Tables showing research site descriptions, weather station summaries, model parameters and statistics, and figures showing a map of study sites and weather stations and sampling protocol.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520130.v1
title: Appendix A. Tables showing research site descriptions, weather station summaries, model parameters and statistics, and figures showing a map of study sites and weather stations and sampling protocol.

description: Tables showing research site descriptions, weather station summaries, model parameters and statistics, and figures showing a map of study sites and weather stations and sampling protocol.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520127
title: Appendix A. Additional information on the structure of the Leslie and Lefkovitch matrices used in this analysis of Red-cockaded Woodpecker (RCW) population dynamics.

description: Additional information on the structure of the Leslie and Lefkovitch matrices used in this analysis of Red-cockaded Woodpecker (RCW) population dynamics.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520127.v1
title: Appendix A. Additional information on the structure of the Leslie and Lefkovitch matrices used in this analysis of Red-cockaded Woodpecker (RCW) population dynamics.

description: Additional information on the structure of the Leslie and Lefkovitch matrices used in this analysis of Red-cockaded Woodpecker (RCW) population dynamics.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520124
title: Appendix B. Additional demographic parameters used in the nonspatially explicit, age-structured, individual-based model Vortex.

description: Additional demographic parameters used in the nonspatially explicit, age-structured, individual-based model Vortex.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520124.v1
title: Appendix B. Additional demographic parameters used in the nonspatially explicit, age-structured, individual-based model Vortex.

description: Additional demographic parameters used in the nonspatially explicit, age-structured, individual-based model Vortex.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520121
title: Appendix C. Additional parameters used in the spatially explicit, individual-based model for Red-cockaded Woodpeckers.

description: Additional parameters used in the spatially explicit, individual-based model for Red-cockaded Woodpeckers.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520121.v1
title: Appendix C. Additional parameters used in the spatially explicit, individual-based model for Red-cockaded Woodpeckers.

description: Additional parameters used in the spatially explicit, individual-based model for Red-cockaded Woodpeckers.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520115
title: Appendix A. Bird species observed and yard-related indices.

description: Bird species observed and yard-related indices.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520112
title: Appendix B. Social survey distributed to residents to gather information about yard characteristics.

description: Social survey distributed to residents to gather information about yard characteristics.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520109
title: Appendix A. Combinations of unique variables from each diary used for modeling expected tally.

description: Combinations of unique variables from each diary used for modeling expected tally.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520109.v1
title: Appendix A. Combinations of unique variables from each diary used for modeling expected tally.

description: Combinations of unique variables from each diary used for modeling expected tally.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520106
title: Appendix B. List of common variables used in all diaries for modeling expected tally.

description: List of common variables used in all diaries for modeling expected tally.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520106.v1
title: Appendix B. List of common variables used in all diaries for modeling expected tally.

description: List of common variables used in all diaries for modeling expected tally.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520097
title: Appendix C. List of unique variables used for modeling harvest tallies from diaries A–H.

description: List of unique variables used for modeling harvest tallies from diaries A–H.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520097.v1
title: Appendix C. List of unique variables used for modeling harvest tallies from diaries A–H.

description: List of unique variables used for modeling harvest tallies from diaries A–H.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520094
title: Appendix A. Photos of vegetation cover types on our study area in the central Sierra Nevada, California.

description: Photos of vegetation cover types on our study area in the central Sierra Nevada, California.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4014405
title: GC-MS analysis of standard mix for geological biomarkers quantification

description: Result from GC-MS analysis of standard mix prepared for geological biomarkers quantification.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520094.v1
title: Appendix A. Photos of vegetation cover types on our study area in the central Sierra Nevada, California.

description: Photos of vegetation cover types on our study area in the central Sierra Nevada, California.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4014404
title: GC-MS analysis of standard mix for geological biomarkers quantification

description: Result from GC-MS analysis of standard mix prepared for geological biomarkers quantification.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520091
title: Appendix B. Description of our procedure for categorizing timber harvests that occurred within California Spotted Owl territories in the central Sierra Nevada, 1993–2012.

description: Description of our procedure for categorizing timber harvests that occurred within California Spotted Owl territories in the central Sierra Nevada, 1993–2012.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520091.v1
title: Appendix B. Description of our procedure for categorizing timber harvests that occurred within California Spotted Owl territories in the central Sierra Nevada, 1993–2012.

description: Description of our procedure for categorizing timber harvests that occurred within California Spotted Owl territories in the central Sierra Nevada, 1993–2012.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520088
title: Appendix C. Model results from step 1, step 2, and step 3 (at the 3-year and 9-year time scales) of our analyses of California spotted owl reproduction, survival, territory extinction, and territory colonization in the central Sierra Nevada, 1993–2012.

description: Model results from step 1, step 2, and step 3 (at the 3-year and 9-year time scales) of our analyses of California spotted owl reproduction, survival, territory extinction, and territory colonization in the central Sierra Nevada, 1993–2012.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520088.v1
title: Appendix C. Model results from step 1, step 2, and step 3 (at the 3-year and 9-year time scales) of our analyses of California spotted owl reproduction, survival, territory extinction, and territory colonization in the central Sierra Nevada, 1993–2012.

description: Model results from step 1, step 2, and step 3 (at the 3-year and 9-year time scales) of our analyses of California spotted owl reproduction, survival, territory extinction, and territory colonization in the central Sierra Nevada, 1993–2012.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520082
title: Appendix A. Detailed description of the iLand wildfire module.

description: Detailed description of the iLand wildfire module.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520079
title: Appendix B. Parameterization and evaluation of the iLand wildfire module.

description: Parameterization and evaluation of the iLand wildfire module.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520076
title: Appendix C. Additional results and analyses of legacy effects on forest ecosystem structure, composition, and functioning.

description: Additional results and analyses of legacy effects on forest ecosystem structure, composition, and functioning.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520073
title: Appendix A. Decision tree for individuals.

description: Decision tree for individuals.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520073.v1
title: Appendix A. Decision tree for individuals.

description: Decision tree for individuals.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520070
title: Appendix B. A figure showing estimated mortality rates for Chamaedorea ernesti-augusti under different harvesting regimes.

description: A figure showing estimated mortality rates for Chamaedorea ernesti-augusti under different harvesting regimes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520070.v1
title: Appendix B. A figure showing estimated mortality rates for Chamaedorea ernesti-augusti under different harvesting regimes.

description: A figure showing estimated mortality rates for Chamaedorea ernesti-augusti under different harvesting regimes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520067
title: Appendix C. Sensitivity analysis.

description: Sensitivity analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520067.v1
title: Appendix C. Sensitivity analysis.

description: Sensitivity analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520064
title: Appendix A. Map of sampling sites.

description: Map of sampling sites.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520061
title: Appendix B. Observed and extrapolated species richness.

description: Observed and extrapolated species richness.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520058
title: Appendix C. Impacts of forest conversion to oil palm using expanded bird and dung beetles data sets.

description: Impacts of forest conversion to oil palm using expanded bird and dung beetles data sets.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520058.v1
title: Appendix C. Impacts of forest conversion to oil palm using expanded bird and dung beetles data sets.

description: Impacts of forest conversion to oil palm using expanded bird and dung beetles data sets.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520055
title: Appendix D. Variation in species composition among habitats with presence–absence matrices.

description: Variation in species composition among habitats with presence–absence matrices.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520052
title: Appendix E. Correlations among taxa using four methods to quantify logging impacts.

description: Correlations among taxa using four methods to quantify logging impacts.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520052.v1
title: Appendix E. Correlations among taxa using four methods to quantify logging impacts.

description: Correlations among taxa using four methods to quantify logging impacts.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520049
title: Appendix F. Correlations among taxa using three methods to quantify logging and oil palm impacts.

description: Correlations among taxa using three methods to quantify logging and oil palm impacts.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520043
title: Appendix A. A table showing presence/absence of plant species in both habitats for cattle-grazed and cattle-free areas.

description: A table showing presence/absence of plant species in both habitats for cattle-grazed and cattle-free areas.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520040
title: Appendix B. A table showing ANOSIM results on the differences in plant species assemblages between different habitats and grazing treatments up to 19 months after rain.

description: A table showing ANOSIM results on the differences in plant species assemblages between different habitats and grazing treatments up to 19 months after rain.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520037
title: Appendix C. A table showing SIMPER vegetation results for habitat categories and grazing treatments 6 and 19 months after rain.

description: A table showing SIMPER vegetation results for habitat categories and grazing treatments 6 and 19 months after rain.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520034
title: Appendix D. Tables showing repeated-measures ANOVA results testing effects of habitat and grazing treatment on various components of the biota, a table showing the effects of habitat and grazing treatments on abundance of mammal families Dasyuridae and Rodentia and species Pseudomys hermannsburgensis and Sminthopsis youngsoni, and a table showing effects of habitat and grazing treatments on abundance of reptile families Agamidae and Scincidae and species Ctenophorus nuchalis, C. isolepis,...

description: Tables showing repeated-measures ANOVA results testing effects of habitat and grazing treatment on various components of the biota, a table showing the effects of habitat and grazing treatments on abundance of mammal families Dasyuridae and Rodentia and species Pseudomys hermannsburgensis and Sminthopsis youngsoni, and a table showing effects of habitat and grazing treatments on abundance of reptile families Agamidae and Scincidae and species Ctenophorus nuchalis, C. isolepis, and Lerista labialis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520028
title: Appendix A. Linear mixed-effects model selection results and best-model ANOVA tests for total shrub volume and density and the volumes of individual canopy species.

description: Linear mixed-effects model selection results and best-model ANOVA tests for total shrub volume and density and the volumes of individual canopy species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520028.v1
title: Appendix A. Linear mixed-effects model selection results and best-model ANOVA tests for total shrub volume and density and the volumes of individual canopy species.

description: Linear mixed-effects model selection results and best-model ANOVA tests for total shrub volume and density and the volumes of individual canopy species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520025
title: Appendix A. Details on geolocation accuracy.

description: Details on geolocation accuracy.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520025.v1
title: Appendix A. Details on geolocation accuracy.

description: Details on geolocation accuracy.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520022
title: Appendix B. A figure showing the variation of aboveground biomass (AGB) prediction quality with the number of clusters considered.

description: A figure showing the variation of aboveground biomass (AGB) prediction quality with the number of clusters considered.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520022.v1
title: Appendix B. A figure showing the variation of aboveground biomass (AGB) prediction quality with the number of clusters considered.

description: A figure showing the variation of aboveground biomass (AGB) prediction quality with the number of clusters considered.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520019
title: Appendix C. A figure showing the prediction of AGB, basal area, and large stem density based on texture piecewise regression model.

description: A figure showing the prediction of AGB, basal area, and large stem density based on texture piecewise regression model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520019.v1
title: Appendix C. A figure showing the prediction of AGB, basal area, and large stem density based on texture piecewise regression model.

description: A figure showing the prediction of AGB, basal area, and large stem density based on texture piecewise regression model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520016
title: Appendix D. A figure comparing the residual standard errors (RSE) from AGB prediction models based on random clusters vs. the k-means clusters.

description: A figure comparing the residual standard errors (RSE) from AGB prediction models based on random clusters vs. the k-means clusters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520016.v1
title: Appendix D. A figure comparing the residual standard errors (RSE) from AGB prediction models based on random clusters vs. the k-means clusters.

description: A figure comparing the residual standard errors (RSE) from AGB prediction models based on random clusters vs. the k-means clusters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520013
title: Appendix E. A figure showing the predictions based on the leave-one-out cross-validation.

description: A figure showing the predictions based on the leave-one-out cross-validation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520013.v1
title: Appendix E. A figure showing the predictions based on the leave-one-out cross-validation.

description: A figure showing the predictions based on the leave-one-out cross-validation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520010
title: Appendix F. A set of forest windows (1 ha) illustrating the textural gradient within each cluster with associated mean r-spectrum.

description: A set of forest windows (1 ha) illustrating the textural gradient within each cluster with associated mean r-spectrum.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520010.v1
title: Appendix F. A set of forest windows (1 ha) illustrating the textural gradient within each cluster with associated mean r-spectrum.

description: A set of forest windows (1 ha) illustrating the textural gradient within each cluster with associated mean r-spectrum.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520007
title: Appendix A. Yodzis-Innes model description.

description: Yodzis-Innes model description.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520007.v1
title: Appendix A. Yodzis-Innes model description.

description: Yodzis-Innes model description.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520004
title: Appendix B. DEB-IBM model description.

description: DEB-IBM model description.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520004.v1
title: Appendix B. DEB-IBM model description.

description: DEB-IBM model description.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520001
title: Appendix A. Daily maximum and minimum temperatures for plot (A) U1 and (B) L1, and midday vapor pressure deficit at plot (C) L1 from 1 December 2010 to 28 September 2012.

description: Daily maximum and minimum temperatures for plot (A) U1 and (B) L1, and midday vapor pressure deficit at plot (C) L1 from 1 December 2010 to 28 September 2012.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3520001.v1
title: Appendix A. Daily maximum and minimum temperatures for plot (A) U1 and (B) L1, and midday vapor pressure deficit at plot (C) L1 from 1 December 2010 to 28 September 2012.

description: Daily maximum and minimum temperatures for plot (A) U1 and (B) L1, and midday vapor pressure deficit at plot (C) L1 from 1 December 2010 to 28 September 2012.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519998
title: Appendix A. Figures showing proportion of (Fig. A1) dry and (Fig. A2) moist conifer forest available to treat and hectares actually treated under the active management scenario and different climate assumptions.

description: Figures showing proportion of (Fig. A1) dry and (Fig. A2) moist conifer forest available to treat and hectares actually treated under the active management scenario and different climate assumptions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519998.v1
title: Appendix A. Figures showing proportion of (Fig. A1) dry and (Fig. A2) moist conifer forest available to treat and hectares actually treated under the active management scenario and different climate assumptions.

description: Figures showing proportion of (Fig. A1) dry and (Fig. A2) moist conifer forest available to treat and hectares actually treated under the active management scenario and different climate assumptions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3519995
title: Appendix A. A table showing showing climatic variables used to define the climate space of the conterminous United States (CONUS) and factor loadings of each variable on the first three principal component analysis axes; a table showing geographic extent, protection network coverage, land cover fraction, and land ownership of each climate domain; and figures showing maps of climatic variables for the CONUS; optimal partitioning of the climate space of the CONUS; size-elevation relationship...

description: A table showing showing climatic variables used to define the climate space of the conterminous United States (CONUS) and factor loadings of each variable on the first three principal component analysis axes; a table showing geographic extent, protection network coverage, land cover fraction, and land ownership of each climate domain; and figures showing maps of climatic variables for the CONUS; optimal partitioning of the climate space of the CONUS; size-elevation relationship of the climate domains and elevation of protected and unprotected areas; and distribution of climate conservation gaps and federal lands and representation of the climate domains by Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, Forest Service, and National Parks Service.