cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/c15vod
title: Why friends and neighbors? Explaining the electoral appeal of local roots

description: Data and replication code for the article, "Why friends and neighbors? Explaining the electoral appeal of local roots".
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/jdjbsr
title: Measuring the Quality of Inpatient Consultation in the Intensive Care Unit: Nursing and Family Perspectives on Communication

description: De-identified data for publication "Measuring the Quality of Inpatient Consultation in the Intensive Care Unit: Nursing and Family Perspectives on Communication"
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/phqsdf
title: PDB - 5OCY: Crystal structure of ACPA E4 in complex with CII-C-48-CIT, (310K, 37°C, 100 ns): RMSD, SASA, RMSF, Rg, H-bonds

description: PDB - 5OCY: Crystal structure of ACPA E4 in complex with CII-C-48-CIT, (310K, 37°C, 100 ns): RMSD, SASA, RMSF, Rg, H-bonds
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/42spor
title: 2021-05 Blended TROPOMI+GOSAT

description: 2021-05 Blended TROPOMI+GOSAT
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/pfu9d
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1858, Senate laid on the table, SC1/series 230, Petition of D.M. Allen

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Removal of Edward Greeley Loring &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11029793"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11029793&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Westminster &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;D.M. Allen&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Marcus Ames&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Isabella Allen&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 94 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 50 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 44 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, legal voters, non voters, [females], ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1858, laid on the table &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/c1hfr
title: Passed Acts; St. 1861, c.91, SC1/series 229, Petition of Charles Thompson

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: For the repeal of the personal liberty laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10668952"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10668952&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Charlestown &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Columbus Tyler, Somerville; committee on the personal liberty laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Charles Thompson&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Timothy Sawyer&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Edward Lawrence&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1861-01-26,1861-01-28 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on January 26, 1861 and referred to the committee on the personal liberty laws and received in the Senate on January 28, 1861 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 53 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 53 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, legal voters &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: St. 1861, c.91, passed March 25, 1861 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/cckc2
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1861, leave to withdraw, SC1/series 231, Petition of Samuel Gifford

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Against slave hunting &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858782"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858782&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Fall River &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Lloyd S. Earle, Fall River; committee on the personal liberty law &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Samuel Gifford&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Charles Borden&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Isaac Fiske&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1861-01-28 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on January 28, 1861 and referred to the committee on the personal liberty law and sent for concurrence &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 140 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent for concurrence &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 45 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 76 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Other male signatures: 14 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Unidentified signatures: 5 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, legal voters, other adults, [females], [other males], ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1861, leave to withdraw &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/pkdgy
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1842, Docket 11057, SC1/series 231, Petition of Fanny Downs

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: To define rights on railroads &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858164"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858164&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Andover &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: David Joy, Nantucket &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Fanny Downs&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Rebeckah H. Foster&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Sarah Densmore&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 114 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 114 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: Yes &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: women, [females], ["females"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1842, Docket 11057 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/84y6bl
title: Replication Data for: Incumbency status and candidate responsiveness to voters in two-stage elections beginning with a primary

description: Theories of representation suggest that candidates should respond ideologically to their constituency. Two-stage elections like those in the U.S. force candidates to decide which parts of their constituency they should respond to: citizens who are active enough to participate in primaries or those who only participate in general elections. We posit that non-incumbent candidates should mostly focus on the preferences of primary voters while incumbents should be largely unmoved by the preferences of either set of voters. We test these expectations using data from U.S. House and Senate contests and find support for our theory. Our results suggest that scholars should pay closer attention to the two-stage nature of U.S. elections when evaluating electoral responsiveness.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/jkpeba
title: Ecosystem 2000
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/pisaj5
title: تاريخ وهوية جامعة الملكة أروى على الإنترنت ومراحل التطوير منذ العام 1998 - 2021 م

description: تأسست جامعة الملكة أروى ومارست نشاطها التعليمي منذ مطلع العام 1996 م واستقبلت العديد من الطلبة وأعضاء هيئة التدريس المحليين والدوليين وشكلت احدى اهم مؤسسات التعليم العالي الأهلي في تلك الحقبة وضمن أنشطه الطلاب والتطبيق العملي للمواد الدراسية قام مجموعة من الطلاب بإنشاء اول موقع إلكتروني وكان يهتم بالتعريف عن الجامعة وأخبارها واهم كلياتها وأقسامها والعديد من الخدمات التي نراها بدائية في وقتنا الحاضر الا انها كانت مشروع ناجح نال إعجاب الجميع ، وعندما علمت الدكتورة وهيبة فارع رئيس مجلس أمناء الجامعة بالأمر اشرفت بنفسها وبشكل مباشر على مراحل تصميم وبرمجة موقع جامعة الملكة أروى وتكريماً لهؤلاء الطلبة اعتمدت رئاسة الجامعة المشروع كموقع رسمي يمثل نشاط جامعة الملكة على الشبكة العنكبوتية وتم العمل رسمياً بالموقع ونشرة على الإنترنت من مطلع العام 1998 م وكانت اول جامعة يمنية تطلق موقعها الالكتروني على شبكة الإنترنت وحصلت على تقييم جيد وعضويه لدى منظمة اليونسكو للتعليم في حينها.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/4fo0zy
title: Efficacité d'un kit régional indigène amazonien dans le dépistage auditif néonatal à Belém do Pará

description: La perte auditive peut se produire à différents niveaux physiologiques et degrés, affectant principalement les enfants. La loi n° 12.303/2010, connue sous le nom de Test de l’Oreille, oblige à réaliser un dépistage auditif chez les nouveau-nés. Différents instruments sonores non calibrés peuvent être utilisés pour réaliser un dépistage auditif comportemental : sifflet en plastique, tapotement d’une cuillère dans une tasse, jouets en caoutchouc, tambours, maracas en paille et maracas en calebasse, ces trois derniers étant d’origine indigène. L’objectif de ce travail est de vérifier l’efficacité d’un kit régional indigène amazonien dans le dépistage auditif comportemental néonatal à Belém do Pará, pour cela une étude quantitative descriptive a été réalisée. Le kit auditif évalué avec des instruments régionaux s’est avéré efficace, évaluant les principaux réflexes du nouveau-né. Il a également démontré la simplicité d’un mode de détection et la faisabilité de son inclusion dans les méthodes de dépistage de routine en service néonatal, permettant le diagnostic et le suivi précoce de la surdité chez les nouveau-nés, ce qui peut constituer une alternative, notamment dans les régions qui ne disposent pas des équipements traditionnels.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ccmonu
title: Population by Major Age Group: 1390 Census (2011)

description: Iran Population Data from http://irandataportal.syr.edu/population
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/f1lodp
title: Raw Data for University of Tulsa McFarlin Library and COVID Data, 2020-2021

description: These files contain the raw datasets produced by University of Tulsa McFarlin Library systems tracking daily, monthly, bi-annual, or annual interactions with library patrons. Files do not contain any identifying information about library patrons in compliance with state and federal laws regarding library patron privacy and student information privacy. These files are not the final aggregate datasets utilized for this project.

Files may have irregular naming conventions, dates, formats, entry methods, missing data, averaged data, or other inconsistencies because each library system outputs data in a different manner. Aggregate and formatted versions of the data are available within the University of Tulsa McFarlin Library and COVID Data, 2020-2021 Dataverse: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/McFarlinandCOVID. 

All files are housed in Excel spreadsheet formats and may contain multiple tabs.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/bsyak5
title: Replication Data for: Endogenous Political Change: How Different Authoritarian Regimes Trigger Collective Action that Harm Themselves

description: In this paper, we replicate and extend Jeremy Wallace's ``Cities, Redistribution, and Authoritarian Regime Survival", originally published in \textit{The Journal of Politics} (2013). Using cross-national time series data, we re-examine the durability of authoritarian regimes by exploring the relationship between regime types and collective action. First, we find that certain regime types are associated with an increased propensity of collective action. Elite-level collective action is more prevalent under military regimes, and less so under monarchic and single-party regimes. Second, under different types of dictatorship, the threat to regime longevity posed by collective action varies. We show that military and single-party regimes are more vulnerable to \textit{elite}-level conflict. Our study further suggests that military dictatorships are the most fragile type of authoritarian regime. These regimes are associated with a higher likelihood of elite-level collective action, which in turn significantly harms their longevity. Single-party regimes, on the other hand, are more resilient to both mass- and elite-level collective action events. Finally, monarchic regimes, in addition to experiencing higher rates of mass-level action, are more likely to collapse when faced with mass-level uprisings, suggesting a reduced capacity to control large-scale events.
description: Please contact us via email for accessing the Banks data.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/cc7z5e
title: Passed Resolves; Resolves 1969, c.61, SC1/series 228, Petition of Francis J. Bevilacqua

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: School discrimination &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25500538"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25500538&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Haverhill &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Francis J. Bevilacqua, Haverhill; committee on education &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Francis J. Bevilacqua&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1969-01-02,1969-01-02 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on January 2, 1969 and referred to the committee on education and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on January 2, 1969 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: that cities and towns be authorized to pay the salaries of lay teachers in certain private schools &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Resolves 1969, c.61, passed August 4, 1969 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/3zvriq
title: Replication Data for: Stick Then Carrot: When Do Governments Give Amnesty during Civil War?

description: Governments grant amnesties to rebel groups during civil wars and this is a puzzle. Why would the government offer an amnesty, which can be interpreted as a signal of weakness? In certain circumstances, offering amnesty is a rational policy choice. Governments should give amnesties when they are winning: the risk of misinterpreted signals is lessened, costs are low, rebel groups are weakened, and so amnesty can be used instrumentally to encourage defection or division among foot soldiers or as an incentive to leaders. Therefore, the government capitalizes on its military advantage and offers amnesty in a “stick then carrot” tactic. Using a database of amnesties during conflicts from 1990 to 2011, the article shows that governments are more likely to give amnesties following high rebel deaths. The use of amnesty during conflict is nuanced and context is important when understanding strategic choices.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/pj27bb
title: Replication Data for: Partisanship Unmasked? The Role of Politics and Social Norms in COVID-19 Mask-Wearing Behavior

description: Replication data for both the main analysis and power analyses.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/c0vf3
title: Council; Files of Inactive Pardons and Pardons Not Granted, Case of Washington Goode, GC3/series 771, Petition of Henry Chapin

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Execution case &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:12233063"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:12233063&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Worcester &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Henry Chapin&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Henry F. Bishop&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;William B. Taber&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;John Milton Earle&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Benjamin Wheeler&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Calvin Knowlton&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;E.W. Carter&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;A.W. Cox&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Effingham L. Capron&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Thomas Jones&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;John Mason&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Gerry Valentine&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;James Whipple&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;William Brown&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;John Hilton&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;John Quincy Adams&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;William A. Brigham&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Ann Mason&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;James Walker&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;J.W. Walker&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Caleb A. Wall&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Sarah F. Earle&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 1639 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 824 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 324 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Unidentified signatures: 491 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: inhabitants, [females], [males of color], [females of color], ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Washington Goode; three texts; titles next to signatures and "students in the medical institution" next to one section; note on copied signatures; last section of petition is a pamphlet with signatures; some signatures covered by glue or other pieces of paper, have transcribed these when visible &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Files of pardons inactive and not granted, Case of Washington Goode &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/2ouame
title: Brazil News - Ano I - Número 3
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/im4dll
title: Replication Data for: "Perceived Conflict and Leader Dominance: Individual and Contextual Factors Behind Preferences for Dominant Leaders"

description: This data set consists of the raw data for article "Laustsen, Lasse & Michael Bang Petersen, forthcoming: Perceived Conflict and Leader Dominance: Individual and Contextual Factors Behind Preferences for Dominant Leaders. Political Psychology". The data is available with a corresponding do-file for replication analyses in Stata and a Danish languaged description of the sample compiled by the YouGov survey agency.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/4awia
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1839, Docket 10525, SC1/series 231, Petition of Jane H. Hews

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: To abolish slavery in Washington D.C. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11857869"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11857869&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Haverhill &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: James H. Duncan, Haverhill &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Jane H. Hews&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Mary Gile&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Margaret Longley&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Tameyson Kimball&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 228 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 228 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: Yes &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: undersigned, [females], [minors], ["adult ladies"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Not sure on third and fourth names; note on minors at bottom &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1839, Docket 10525 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;