cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730069
title: Table 10 - 6 in Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III

description: Table 10-6: Physicochemical impacts from activities associated with the construction and operation of Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Phase III (Original Table 39)
PhasesProject ActivitiesPhysicochemical ImpactsDrainage congestionNoise levelAir qualitySurface Water qualityGroundwater qualitySoil ErosionSoil qualityDuring ConstructionLabour camp setting and its operation000-1 S-1 S00Access road construction-1 S-1 S-1 S-1 S0-1 S0Land clearing-1 S0000-2 S0Soil excavation-2 S-2 S-2 S-1 S0-1 S-1 SPiling work0-2 S-1 S-1 S-1 S00Concreting work0-2 S-1 S0000Water body crossing work (pipeline laying)-1 S-2 S-1 S-1 S000Provision for safe water and sanitation facilities for workers0000000During OperationSolid /hazardous waste and wastewater generation000-1 L-2 L0-2 LAccess to safe water supply0000+2 L00Accidental chemical oil leaks, spills on land/ water000-1 S00-1 S
[+3 = High Positive Impact, +2 = Moderate positive impact, +1 = Low Positive Impact, 0 = No impact, - 1 = Low Negative Impact, -2 = Moderate Negative Impact, -3 = High Negative Impact S = Short term impact, L = Long term impact]
description: Published as part of Macdonald, Mott, 2025, Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III in null, European Investment Bank (EIB) on page 200, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17261043
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730071
title: Table 10 - 7 in Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III

description: Table 10-7: Socio-economic impacts from activities associated with the construction and operation of Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Phase III (Original Table 40)
Socio-Economic ImpactsPhasesProject ActivitiesLoss of LandLoss of income and displacement (Economic or Physical)TrafficImpact on topsoilPublic Health and safetyEffect on Archaeological sitesHealth and SafetyEmployment and commercial activitiesDurin g ConstLand acquisition-2 L-2 L000000Labour camp setting0000-2S0-1S+2 SAccess road construction0-1 S-1 S-2 S-1 S0-1 S+2 SLand clearing0-1 S0-2 S00-1 S+2 SSoil excavation0-1 S0-1 S-1 S0-1 S+2 SPiling work0000-1 S0-1 S+2 SConcreting work0000-1 S0-1 S+2 SWater body crossing work00-1 S0-1 S0-1 S+2 SProvision for safe water and sanitation facilities for workers0000+2 S0+2S0During OperationAccidental chemical oil leaks, spills on land/ water000-1 S-1 S0-1 S0Solid /hazardous waste and wastewater generation000-1 S-1 S0-1S0Access to safe water supply0000+3 L0+3L0Operational staff movement00-1 S0-1 S000
[+3 = High Positive Impact, +2 = Moderate positive impact, +1 = Low Positive Impact, 0 = No impact, - 1 = Low Negative Impact, -2 = Moderate Negative Impact, -3 = High Negative Impact S = Short term impact, L = Long term impact]
description: Published as part of Macdonald, Mott, 2025, Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III in null, European Investment Bank (EIB) on page 200, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17261043
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730070
title: Table 10 - 7 in Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III

description: Table 10-7: Socio-economic impacts from activities associated with the construction and operation of Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Phase III (Original Table 40)
Socio-Economic ImpactsPhasesProject ActivitiesLoss of LandLoss of income and displacement (Economic or Physical)TrafficImpact on topsoilPublic Health and safetyEffect on Archaeological sitesHealth and SafetyEmployment and commercial activitiesDurin g ConstLand acquisition-2 L-2 L000000Labour camp setting0000-2S0-1S+2 SAccess road construction0-1 S-1 S-2 S-1 S0-1 S+2 SLand clearing0-1 S0-2 S00-1 S+2 SSoil excavation0-1 S0-1 S-1 S0-1 S+2 SPiling work0000-1 S0-1 S+2 SConcreting work0000-1 S0-1 S+2 SWater body crossing work00-1 S0-1 S0-1 S+2 SProvision for safe water and sanitation facilities for workers0000+2 S0+2S0During OperationAccidental chemical oil leaks, spills on land/ water000-1 S-1 S0-1 S0Solid /hazardous waste and wastewater generation000-1 S-1 S0-1S0Access to safe water supply0000+3 L0+3L0Operational staff movement00-1 S0-1 S000
[+3 = High Positive Impact, +2 = Moderate positive impact, +1 = Low Positive Impact, 0 = No impact, - 1 = Low Negative Impact, -2 = Moderate Negative Impact, -3 = High Negative Impact S = Short term impact, L = Long term impact]
description: Published as part of Macdonald, Mott, 2025, Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III in null, European Investment Bank (EIB) on page 200, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17261043
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730073
title: Table 10 - 8 in Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III

description: Table 10-8: Risk Assessment Analysis
Risk assessmentSub-systemFloodSaline intrusionDroughtExtreme temperature2022 - 20502050 - 21002022 - 20502050 - 21002022 - 20502050 - 21002022 - 20502050 - 2100Water intakeHigh (12)High (15)Low (4)Low (4)Medium (8)High (12)Medium (8)Medium (10)Raw water pumping stationHigh (16)Extreme (20)Low (4)Low (4)Medium (8)High (12)High (12)High (15)
description: Published as part of Macdonald, Mott, 2025, Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III in null, European Investment Bank (EIB) on page 203, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17261043
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730072
title: Table 10 - 8 in Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III

description: Table 10-8: Risk Assessment Analysis
Risk assessmentSub-systemFloodSaline intrusionDroughtExtreme temperature2022 - 20502050 - 21002022 - 20502050 - 21002022 - 20502050 - 21002022 - 20502050 - 2100Water intakeHigh (12)High (15)Low (4)Low (4)Medium (8)High (12)Medium (8)Medium (10)Raw water pumping stationHigh (16)Extreme (20)Low (4)Low (4)Medium (8)High (12)High (12)High (15)
description: Published as part of Macdonald, Mott, 2025, Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III in null, European Investment Bank (EIB) on page 203, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17261043
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730074
title: Table 10 - 9 in Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III

description: Table 10-9: Risk Level Description
LegendLikelihood levelConsequence levelInsignificant (1)Minor (2)Moderate (3)Major (4)Catastrophic (5)Almost certain (5)Medium (5)Medium (10)High (15)Extreme (20)Extreme (25)Likely (4)Low (4)Medium (8)High (12)High (16)Extreme (20)Possible (3)Low (3)Medium (6)Medium (9)High (12)High (15)Unlikely (2)Low (2)Low (4)Medium (6)Medium (8)Medium (10)Rare (1)Insignificant (1)Low (2)Low (3)Low (4)Medium (5)
description: Published as part of Macdonald, Mott, 2025, Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III in null, European Investment Bank (EIB) on page 204, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17261043
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730075
title: Table 10 - 9 in Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III

description: Table 10-9: Risk Level Description
LegendLikelihood levelConsequence levelInsignificant (1)Minor (2)Moderate (3)Major (4)Catastrophic (5)Almost certain (5)Medium (5)Medium (10)High (15)Extreme (20)Extreme (25)Likely (4)Low (4)Medium (8)High (12)High (16)Extreme (20)Possible (3)Low (3)Medium (6)Medium (9)High (12)High (15)Unlikely (2)Low (2)Low (4)Medium (6)Medium (8)Medium (10)Rare (1)Insignificant (1)Low (2)Low (3)Low (4)Medium (5)
description: Published as part of Macdonald, Mott, 2025, Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III in null, European Investment Bank (EIB) on page 204, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17261043
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730077
title: Table 10 - 10 in Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III

description: Table 10-10: Risk Rating Matrix
Risk levelDefinitionExtremeExtreme risks demand urgent attention at the most senior level and cannot be simply accepted as a part of routine operations. These risks are not acceptable without treatment.HighHigh risks are the most severe that can be accepted as a part of routine operations without executive sanction, but they are the responsibility of the most senior operational management and reported upon at the executive level. These risks are not acceptable without treatment.MediumMedium risks can be expected to form part of routine operations., but they will be explicitly assigned to relevant managers for action., maintained under review and reported upon at the senior management level. These risks are possibly acceptable without treatment.LowLow risks will be maintained under review, but it is expected that existing controls will be sufficient, and no further action will be required to treat them unless they become more severe. These risks can be acceptable without treatment.
description: Published as part of Macdonald, Mott, 2025, Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III in null, European Investment Bank (EIB) on page 204, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17261043
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730076
title: Table 10 - 10 in Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III

description: Table 10-10: Risk Rating Matrix
Risk levelDefinitionExtremeExtreme risks demand urgent attention at the most senior level and cannot be simply accepted as a part of routine operations. These risks are not acceptable without treatment.HighHigh risks are the most severe that can be accepted as a part of routine operations without executive sanction, but they are the responsibility of the most senior operational management and reported upon at the executive level. These risks are not acceptable without treatment.MediumMedium risks can be expected to form part of routine operations., but they will be explicitly assigned to relevant managers for action., maintained under review and reported upon at the senior management level. These risks are possibly acceptable without treatment.LowLow risks will be maintained under review, but it is expected that existing controls will be sufficient, and no further action will be required to treat them unless they become more severe. These risks can be acceptable without treatment.
description: Published as part of Macdonald, Mott, 2025, Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III in null, European Investment Bank (EIB) on page 204, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17261043
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730083
title: Table 11 - 5 in Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III

description: Table 11-5 Environmental (air quality and noise level) and Socio-economic monitoring during construction phase (Original Table 45)
Parameters/ItemsMonitoring FrequencyResource Required and ResponsibilityCommentParticulate Matter (PM10, PM2.5)Once every 3 months, and as directed by the PDPM10 and PM2.5 measuring equipment.Results to be verified by the Environmental Expert of DSC Team.Contractor’s responsibilityNoise LevelOnce every month, and as directed by the PDNoise level meter. Contractor’s responsibilitySurface Water Quality (pH, Turbidity, BOD, COD, TDS, DO, Ammonia (NH3-N) and Oil & Grease) of Kajla KhalOnce every Quarter and as directed by PDFrom Accredited Laboratory; Contractor’s responsibilityEmployment of workforceOnce every Quarter and as directed by PDContractor’s responsibility, Supervised by the Design Supervision ConsultantCommunity Health and SafetyOnce every Quarter and as directed by PDContractor’s responsibility, Supervised by the Design Supervision ConsultantSurveys and interviews with local residents and businessesOnce in a year as directed by PDContractor’s responsibility, Supervised by the Design Supervision Consultant
Note: Actual monitoring time and location will be decided by DWASA and the Design Supervision Consultant (DSC) and included in the Employer’s Requirements
description: Published as part of Macdonald, Mott, 2025, Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III in null, European Investment Bank (EIB) on page 233, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17261043
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730082
title: Table 11 - 5 in Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III

description: Table 11-5 Environmental (air quality and noise level) and Socio-economic monitoring during construction phase (Original Table 45)
Parameters/ItemsMonitoring FrequencyResource Required and ResponsibilityCommentParticulate Matter (PM10, PM2.5)Once every 3 months, and as directed by the PDPM10 and PM2.5 measuring equipment.Results to be verified by the Environmental Expert of DSC Team.Contractor’s responsibilityNoise LevelOnce every month, and as directed by the PDNoise level meter. Contractor’s responsibilitySurface Water Quality (pH, Turbidity, BOD, COD, TDS, DO, Ammonia (NH3-N) and Oil & Grease) of Kajla KhalOnce every Quarter and as directed by PDFrom Accredited Laboratory; Contractor’s responsibilityEmployment of workforceOnce every Quarter and as directed by PDContractor’s responsibility, Supervised by the Design Supervision ConsultantCommunity Health and SafetyOnce every Quarter and as directed by PDContractor’s responsibility, Supervised by the Design Supervision ConsultantSurveys and interviews with local residents and businessesOnce in a year as directed by PDContractor’s responsibility, Supervised by the Design Supervision Consultant
Note: Actual monitoring time and location will be decided by DWASA and the Design Supervision Consultant (DSC) and included in the Employer’s Requirements
description: Published as part of Macdonald, Mott, 2025, Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III in null, European Investment Bank (EIB) on page 233, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17261043
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730087
title: Table 11 - 7 in Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III

description: Table 11-7: Environmental (water quality and sludge) and Socioeconomic Monitoring during operational phase of proposed WTP (Original Table 47)
Monitoring ItemsWater Quality / Other ParametersMonitoring FrequencyResponsibilityRaw waterpH, Colour, Turbidity, Ammonia, Nitrate, Phosphate, Sulphate, TC, FCDailyDWASALead, Chromium, Mercury, Cadmium, Total Suspended Solids, COD, BOD5, Oil & greaseOnce a monthDWASATreated waterpH, Colour, Turbidity, Ammonia, Nitrate, Residual Chlorine, TC, FCDailyDWASABOD5, COD, Aluminium, Total Dissolved SolidsOnce every two monthsDWASADewatered sludgeTCLP test and determination of Al, Pb, Cr, Cd in TCLP extractOnce every three monthsDWASALiquid residuals from dewatering operationpH, Ammonia-N, BOD5, COD, Cd, Cr, Mercury, Chloride, Total Dissolved Solids, Total Suspended Solids, Nitrate, SulphideOnce a monthDWASAEmployment of workforceOnce every Quarter and as directed by PDContractor’s responsibility, Supervised by the Design Supervision ConsultantDWASACommunity Health and SafetyOnce every Quarter and as directed by PDContractor’s responsibility, Supervised by the Design Supervision ConsultantDWASASurveys and interviews with local residents and businessesOnce in a year as directed by PDContractor’s responsibility, Supervised by the Design Supervision ConsultantDWASA
(1) The parameters listed above are based on water quality measurements of Meghna River as a part of this study. The list should be updated based on monitoring results and information on possible pollution of river water by contaminants (e.g., from an industrial source)
(2) Actual monitoring time and location will be decided by DWASA and the Design Supervision Consultant (DSC) and included in the Employer’s Requirements.
description: Published as part of Macdonald, Mott, 2025, Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III in null, European Investment Bank (EIB) on page 236, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17261043
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730086
title: Table 11 - 7 in Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III

description: Table 11-7: Environmental (water quality and sludge) and Socioeconomic Monitoring during operational phase of proposed WTP (Original Table 47)
Monitoring ItemsWater Quality / Other ParametersMonitoring FrequencyResponsibilityRaw waterpH, Colour, Turbidity, Ammonia, Nitrate, Phosphate, Sulphate, TC, FCDailyDWASALead, Chromium, Mercury, Cadmium, Total Suspended Solids, COD, BOD5, Oil & greaseOnce a monthDWASATreated waterpH, Colour, Turbidity, Ammonia, Nitrate, Residual Chlorine, TC, FCDailyDWASABOD5, COD, Aluminium, Total Dissolved SolidsOnce every two monthsDWASADewatered sludgeTCLP test and determination of Al, Pb, Cr, Cd in TCLP extractOnce every three monthsDWASALiquid residuals from dewatering operationpH, Ammonia-N, BOD5, COD, Cd, Cr, Mercury, Chloride, Total Dissolved Solids, Total Suspended Solids, Nitrate, SulphideOnce a monthDWASAEmployment of workforceOnce every Quarter and as directed by PDContractor’s responsibility, Supervised by the Design Supervision ConsultantDWASACommunity Health and SafetyOnce every Quarter and as directed by PDContractor’s responsibility, Supervised by the Design Supervision ConsultantDWASASurveys and interviews with local residents and businessesOnce in a year as directed by PDContractor’s responsibility, Supervised by the Design Supervision ConsultantDWASA
(1) The parameters listed above are based on water quality measurements of Meghna River as a part of this study. The list should be updated based on monitoring results and information on possible pollution of river water by contaminants (e.g., from an industrial source)
(2) Actual monitoring time and location will be decided by DWASA and the Design Supervision Consultant (DSC) and included in the Employer’s Requirements.
description: Published as part of Macdonald, Mott, 2025, Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III in null, European Investment Bank (EIB) on page 236, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17261043
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730091
title: Table 11 - 8 in Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III

description: Table 11-8: Preliminary cost estimates for monitoring and other mitigation activities during construction phase (Original Table 48)
Parameter/ActivityFrequency of activityPreliminary cost estimatePreliminary cost for 1 year activity periodParticulate Matter (PM10, PM2.5)Once every 3 monthsTk. 30,000/- per each set of PM10 and PM2.5 measurementTk. 1,20,000/-Noise LevelOnce every month (day and night)Tk. 25,000/- (per set of measurement)Tk. 3,30,000/-Surface Water Quality (pH, Turbidity, BOD, COD, TDS, DO, Ammonia (NH3-N) and Oil & Grease) of Kajla KhalOnce every 3 monthsTk. 30,000/- (per set of measurement)Tk. 120,000/-Water spraying for dust controlAt least twice a dayTk. 10,000/- per site per monthTk. 1,20,000/-Waste DisposalEvery DayTk. 80,000/- per site per monthTk. 960,000/-Total annual cost for monitoring during construction phaseTk. 16,50,000/-
Notes: (1) Actual monitoring time and location will be decided by DSC. and the Design Supervision Consultant (DSC) and included in the Employer’s Requirements (2) The estimated costs for particular matter (PM) and noise level measurements are based on current rates charged by BRTC, BUET for analysis of the parameters.
description: Published as part of Macdonald, Mott, 2025, Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III in null, European Investment Bank (EIB) on page 237, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17261043
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730090
title: Table 11 - 8 in Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III

description: Table 11-8: Preliminary cost estimates for monitoring and other mitigation activities during construction phase (Original Table 48)
Parameter/ActivityFrequency of activityPreliminary cost estimatePreliminary cost for 1 year activity periodParticulate Matter (PM10, PM2.5)Once every 3 monthsTk. 30,000/- per each set of PM10 and PM2.5 measurementTk. 1,20,000/-Noise LevelOnce every month (day and night)Tk. 25,000/- (per set of measurement)Tk. 3,30,000/-Surface Water Quality (pH, Turbidity, BOD, COD, TDS, DO, Ammonia (NH3-N) and Oil & Grease) of Kajla KhalOnce every 3 monthsTk. 30,000/- (per set of measurement)Tk. 120,000/-Water spraying for dust controlAt least twice a dayTk. 10,000/- per site per monthTk. 1,20,000/-Waste DisposalEvery DayTk. 80,000/- per site per monthTk. 960,000/-Total annual cost for monitoring during construction phaseTk. 16,50,000/-
Notes: (1) Actual monitoring time and location will be decided by DSC. and the Design Supervision Consultant (DSC) and included in the Employer’s Requirements (2) The estimated costs for particular matter (PM) and noise level measurements are based on current rates charged by BRTC, BUET for analysis of the parameters.
description: Published as part of Macdonald, Mott, 2025, Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III in null, European Investment Bank (EIB) on page 237, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17261043
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730093
title: Table 11 - 9 in Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III

description: Table 11-9: Preliminary cost estimates for monitoring and other mitigation activities during operational phase (Original Table 48)
Parameter/ActivityFrequency of activityPreliminary cost estimatePreliminary cost for 1 year activity periodRaw water: pH, Colour, Turbidity, Ammonia, Nitrate, Phosphate, SulphateDailyTk. 6,000/- per set of measurementTk. 21,90,000/-Raw water: Lead, Chromium, Mercury, Cadmium, Total Suspended Solids, COD, BOD5, Oil & greaseOnce a monthTk. 15,000/- per set of measurementTk. 1,80,000/-Treated water: pH, Colour, Turbidity, Ammonia, Nitrate, Residual Chlorine, TC, FCDailyTk. 5,500/- per set of measurementTk. 20,07,500/-Treated water: BOD5, COD, Aluminium, Total Dissolved SolidsOnce every two monthsTk. 8,500/- per set of measurementTk. 51,000/-Sludge from Clarifiers: TCLP test and determination of Al, Pb, Cr, Cd in TCLP extractOnce every three monthsTk. 14,000/- per set of measurementTk. 56,000/-Total annual cost for monitoring during operation phaseTk. 44,84,500/-
Notes:
(1) The parameters listed above are based on water quality measurements of Meghna River as a part of this study. The list should be updated based on monitoring results and information on possible pollution of river water by contaminants (e.g., from an industrial source)
(2) Actual monitoring time and location will be decided by DWASA and the Design Supervision Consultant (DSC) and included in the Employer’s Requirements.
(3) The estimated costs are based on current rates charged by BRTC, BUET for analysis of the parameters.
description: Published as part of Macdonald, Mott, 2025, Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III in null, European Investment Bank (EIB) on page 237, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17261043
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17730092
title: Table 11 - 9 in Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III

description: Table 11-9: Preliminary cost estimates for monitoring and other mitigation activities during operational phase (Original Table 48)
Parameter/ActivityFrequency of activityPreliminary cost estimatePreliminary cost for 1 year activity periodRaw water: pH, Colour, Turbidity, Ammonia, Nitrate, Phosphate, SulphateDailyTk. 6,000/- per set of measurementTk. 21,90,000/-Raw water: Lead, Chromium, Mercury, Cadmium, Total Suspended Solids, COD, BOD5, Oil & greaseOnce a monthTk. 15,000/- per set of measurementTk. 1,80,000/-Treated water: pH, Colour, Turbidity, Ammonia, Nitrate, Residual Chlorine, TC, FCDailyTk. 5,500/- per set of measurementTk. 20,07,500/-Treated water: BOD5, COD, Aluminium, Total Dissolved SolidsOnce every two monthsTk. 8,500/- per set of measurementTk. 51,000/-Sludge from Clarifiers: TCLP test and determination of Al, Pb, Cr, Cd in TCLP extractOnce every three monthsTk. 14,000/- per set of measurementTk. 56,000/-Total annual cost for monitoring during operation phaseTk. 44,84,500/-
Notes:
(1) The parameters listed above are based on water quality measurements of Meghna River as a part of this study. The list should be updated based on monitoring results and information on possible pollution of river water by contaminants (e.g., from an industrial source)
(2) Actual monitoring time and location will be decided by DWASA and the Design Supervision Consultant (DSC) and included in the Employer’s Requirements.
(3) The estimated costs are based on current rates charged by BRTC, BUET for analysis of the parameters.
description: Published as part of Macdonald, Mott, 2025, Saidabad Water Treatment Plant Project, Phase III in null, European Investment Bank (EIB) on page 237, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17261043