cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3846948
title: Investigating factors affecting vegetation density through dandelion coverage in a grassland

description: OverviewThis study was conducted on September 21, 2016, between 14:30 and 16:30 (EST). The location was the grassland immediately east of York University's Maloca Community Garden. The weather was sunny and the temperature was in the high 20's (Celsius). On the grassland, there is a baseball diamond, three rows of metal benches, a few trees, and gentle hills. Due to human activity and direct sunlight, some vegetation on the grassland was withered.<br>MethodsTransect tape was placed on the grassland. Dandelions that intersected the pathway of the tape were studied. The following data was collected: its distance from the origin, height of the plant, number of leaves on the plant, number of flowers on the plant, and the vegetation cover near the plant. Distances and heights were recorded to the nearest centimetre. On a scale of 0 to 3, 0 denoted an open area and 3 denoted a highly crowded area. A total of 50 dandelions were noted. At approximately every 25 metres, the transect tape was randomly moved onto a different patch of grassland (tape was not long enough).<br>MetadataPlant: 50 dandelionsDistance: metres between the origin (randomly selected) and the plantHeight: the vertical growth of the plant, measured in metresLeaves: the number of jagged leaves sprouting from the base of the plantFlowers: the number of flower or seed heads belonging to a single individualCrowdedness: calculated on a scale of 0 to 3, 0 represents an open area and 3 signifies a highly concentrated area of vegetation
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3846948.v1
title: Investigating factors affecting vegetation density through dandelion coverage in a grassland

description: OverviewThis study was conducted on September 21, 2016, between 14:30 and 16:30 (EST). The location was the grassland immediately east of York University's Maloca Community Garden. The weather was sunny and the temperature was in the high 20's (Celsius). On the grassland, there is a baseball diamond, three rows of metal benches, a few trees, and gentle hills. Due to human activity and direct sunlight, some vegetation on the grassland was withered.<br>MethodsTransect tape was placed on the grassland. Dandelions that intersected the pathway of the tape were studied. The following data was collected: its distance from the origin, height of the plant, number of leaves on the plant, number of flowers on the plant, and the vegetation cover near the plant. Distances and heights were recorded to the nearest centimetre. On a scale of 0 to 3, 0 denoted an open area and 3 denoted a highly crowded area. A total of 50 dandelions were noted. At approximately every 25 metres, the transect tape was randomly moved onto a different patch of grassland (tape was not long enough).<br>MetadataPlant: 50 dandelionsDistance: metres between the origin (randomly selected) and the plantHeight: the vertical growth of the plant, measured in metresLeaves: the number of jagged leaves sprouting from the base of the plantFlowers: the number of flower or seed heads belonging to a single individualCrowdedness: calculated on a scale of 0 to 3, 0 represents an open area and 3 signifies a highly concentrated area of vegetation
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/jtyeob
title: mea20160207_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/j0fncv
title: mea20161224_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3846936
title: Lab 2 - BIOL 2050 - Field training with plants.csv

description: The study was conducted on September 21, 2016 in a woodlot at York University, Keele Campus, Toronto, ON, Canada by Pham Ha Phuong Do and Victor Suay Espi.<br>For data set #3, a random tree was selected, and 10 pairs of tree were randomly picked from the chosen tree. The distance between the trees in each pair was measured in meter by big measuring tape, and the diameters of each tree picked to pair with the chosen tree was measured in centimeter by a smaller pocket measuring tape. <br>To measure the distance between the trees, the measuring tape was used straight from the edge of the one tree to another. <br>The diameter of the trees was measured at approximately chest height of the main trunks.<br>*Note: Data set #4 and meta data are included in the same sheet, as cvs file doesn't allow multiple sheets in one file.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/0yvnyp
title: mea20150722_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3846936.v2
title: Lab 2 - BIOL 2050 - Field training with plants.csv

description: The study was conducted on September 21, 2016 in a woodlot at York University, Keele Campus, Toronto, ON, Canada by Pham Ha Phuong Do and Victor Suay Espi.<br>For data set #3, a random tree was selected, and 10 pairs of tree were randomly picked from the chosen tree. The distance between the trees in each pair was measured in meter by big measuring tape, and the diameters of each tree picked to pair with the chosen tree was measured in centimeter by a smaller pocket measuring tape. <br>To measure the distance between the trees, the measuring tape was used straight from the edge of the one tree to another. <br>The diameter of the trees was measured at approximately chest height of the main trunks.<br>*Note: Data set #4 and meta data are included in the same sheet, as cvs file doesn't allow multiple sheets in one file.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/gk0yg9
title: mea20150702_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3846936.v1
title: Lab 2 - BIOL 2050.csv

description: The study was conducted on September 21, 2016 in a woodlot at York University, Keele Campus, Toronto, ON, Canada by Pham Ha Phuong Do and Victor Suay Espi.<br>For data set #3, a random tree was selected, and 10 pairs of tree were randomly picked from the chosen tree. The distance between the trees in each pair was measured in meter by big measuring tape, and the diameters of each tree picked to pair with the chosen tree was measured in centimeter by a smaller pocket measuring tape. <br>To measure the distance between the trees, the measuring tape was used straight from the edge of the one tree to another. <br>The diameter of the trees was measured at approximately chest height of the main trunks.<br>*Note: Data set #4 and meta data are included in the same sheet, as cvs file doesn't allow multiple sheets in one file.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/gsblzd
title: mea20161026_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3846930
title: ecolgy data set .xlsx

description: Meta- data :Dbh of the mother tree ( cm): Is the diameter size of the tree that was measured by a measurement tape. The diameter was measured at our chest hight in specific. Canopy coverage of the mother tree ( %): a sequel was made in our hand, and we looked up to the sleeves and measured the percentage of the sleeves Dbh sapling (cm ) : Is the diameter size of the tree that was measured by a measurement tape. The diameter was measured at our chest hight in specific. <br><br>Site description : the site called the Danby grass / woodlot… it was sunny day and the sky was clear . Temperature was around 26 C and the work was done between 2:30- 5 pm on Wednesday the 21 of September. <br>Methods: we walked to the field and measured 10 trees and we identify them as a mother tree. Tress that were twice taller our hight and more than 5 cm in diameter was counted as the mother tree. The sapling tree was any other tree that was next to the mother tree and not taller than 200 cm. the Dbh was the measurement of the diameter at our chest hight and was measured with a measurement tape. In the other hand, the % canopy coverage of the mother tree was measured by making a square in our hand and look at the sleeves and see how much is the coverage percent comparing to that square. Hypothesis : hypothesis : it was hypothesis that the size of the diameter of the mother tree and the more canopy coverage percent are inversely proportion to the dbh of the sapling because the mother will take most of the nutrition available foe example amount of water and sun light <br>Prediction : The bigger the size of the diameter of the mother tree and the more canopy coverage percent, the smaller the dbh of the sapling.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3846930.v1
title: ecolgy data set .xlsx

description: Meta- data :Dbh of the mother tree ( cm): Is the diameter size of the tree that was measured by a measurement tape. The diameter was measured at our chest hight in specific. Canopy coverage of the mother tree ( %): a sequel was made in our hand, and we looked up to the sleeves and measured the percentage of the sleeves Dbh sapling (cm ) : Is the diameter size of the tree that was measured by a measurement tape. The diameter was measured at our chest hight in specific. <br><br>Site description : the site called the Danby grass / woodlot… it was sunny day and the sky was clear . Temperature was around 26 C and the work was done between 2:30- 5 pm on Wednesday the 21 of September. <br>Methods: we walked to the field and measured 10 trees and we identify them as a mother tree. Tress that were twice taller our hight and more than 5 cm in diameter was counted as the mother tree. The sapling tree was any other tree that was next to the mother tree and not taller than 200 cm. the Dbh was the measurement of the diameter at our chest hight and was measured with a measurement tape. In the other hand, the % canopy coverage of the mother tree was measured by making a square in our hand and look at the sleeves and see how much is the coverage percent comparing to that square. Hypothesis : hypothesis : it was hypothesis that the size of the diameter of the mother tree and the more canopy coverage percent are inversely proportion to the dbh of the sapling because the mother will take most of the nutrition available foe example amount of water and sun light <br>Prediction : The bigger the size of the diameter of the mother tree and the more canopy coverage percent, the smaller the dbh of the sapling.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/no5znr
title: mea20160924_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3846915
title: BIOL 2050 Lab 1: Dataset of Types of Hair Pigments

description: <b>Meta-data</b>VariablesGender: biologically determinedHair: determined by pigmentation as seen by eye
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3846915.v1
title: BIOL 2050 Lab 1: Dataset of Types of Hair Pigments

description: <b>Meta-data</b>VariablesGender: biologically determinedHair: determined by pigmentation as seen by eye
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/q7yodo
title: mea20160226_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/ihkb8t
title: mea20160430_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/4hjq3w
title: mea20150103_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3846903
title: Danby Grassland Aster Transect Dataset

description: <b>Site Description</b>Sampling taken outdoors in the Danby grassland on the York University Keele campus. The weather was a mix of sun and clouds, 28 degrees Celsius. The grassland was a clearing with no tree canopy, and surrounded by trees and a woodlot on all sides. Samples were taken from 2:30-5:00 in the afternoon. There was continuous ground cover at the site. <b>Metadata</b> Height: The first factor is height. The height of each plant was measured in centimeters using a measuring tape. The plant was measured from the base of the stem to the top of the stem. If the plant was bending over at all, the stem was pulled straight and taught alongside the vertical measuring tape. No broken-stemmed plants were included in the data. Level of Crowding: The second factor is level of crowding. Crowding was measured on a scale from 0-3, based on the following definitions: 0 = open, 1 = some plants nearby, 2 = quite a few plants nearby, and 3 = very crowded bunch of plants, all within 50cm of the plant of interest. Number of leaves: The number of leaves is the response. We counted all the leaves on every stem of the plant (including if the stem branched into 2 or more separate stems), including both dead and living leaves. Size was not relevant when counting. We included broken/partial leaves as well in our count.Distance on transect: Measured based on the location of the plant, perpendicular to the transect. Was an estimated measurement.Number of Flowers: A counted observation, and small, closed buds were included as flowers.<br> <b>Methods</b> A 30-metre transect was placed randomly in the Danby grassland, and was extended on a straight path to a length of 25 metres. I then walked along the transect, beginning at 0m. Each time an individual of the plant species I was sampling was spotted, I stopped and took measurements. 20 plants in total were measured using random sampling. The plant species was identified based on its purple flowers, as well as its leaf shape and characteristics, having one very defined midrib and pointed apex, for plants that had no flowers. Individual plants were determined by observing that each plant had one steam directed into the ground, so even if a plant had multiple stems branching off of the stem going into the ground, all of the branching stems were considered one plant. <b>Hypothesis</b> The height and level of crowding of a plant affect the number of leaves it has. This is because the leaves grow evenly from all parts of the stem, starting just above its base, so leaf number and plant height correlate, and because the level of crowding determines the amount of competition the plant has for nutrients, water and sunlight, which affects the number of leaves it is able to grow. <b>Predictions</b> The taller the plant, the more number of leaves it will have. The higher the level of crowding, the less number of leaves the plant will have.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/gbhtwi
title: mea20160222_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3846903.v2
title: Danby Grassland Aster Transect Dataset

description: <b>Site Description</b>Sampling taken outdoors in the Danby grassland on the York University Keele campus. The weather was a mix of sun and clouds, 28 degrees Celsius. The grassland was a clearing with no tree canopy, and surrounded by trees and a woodlot on all sides. Samples were taken from 2:30-5:00 in the afternoon. There was continuous ground cover at the site. <b>Metadata</b> Height: The first factor is height. The height of each plant was measured in centimeters using a measuring tape. The plant was measured from the base of the stem to the top of the stem. If the plant was bending over at all, the stem was pulled straight and taught alongside the vertical measuring tape. No broken-stemmed plants were included in the data. Level of Crowding: The second factor is level of crowding. Crowding was measured on a scale from 0-3, based on the following definitions: 0 = open, 1 = some plants nearby, 2 = quite a few plants nearby, and 3 = very crowded bunch of plants, all within 50cm of the plant of interest. Number of leaves: The number of leaves is the response. We counted all the leaves on every stem of the plant (including if the stem branched into 2 or more separate stems), including both dead and living leaves. Size was not relevant when counting. We included broken/partial leaves as well in our count.Distance on transect: Measured based on the location of the plant, perpendicular to the transect. Was an estimated measurement.Number of Flowers: A counted observation, and small, closed buds were included as flowers.<br> <b>Methods</b> A 30-metre transect was placed randomly in the Danby grassland, and was extended on a straight path to a length of 25 metres. I then walked along the transect, beginning at 0m. Each time an individual of the plant species I was sampling was spotted, I stopped and took measurements. 20 plants in total were measured using random sampling. The plant species was identified based on its purple flowers, as well as its leaf shape and characteristics, having one very defined midrib and pointed apex, for plants that had no flowers. Individual plants were determined by observing that each plant had one steam directed into the ground, so even if a plant had multiple stems branching off of the stem going into the ground, all of the branching stems were considered one plant. <b>Hypothesis</b> The height and level of crowding of a plant affect the number of leaves it has. This is because the leaves grow evenly from all parts of the stem, starting just above its base, so leaf number and plant height correlate, and because the level of crowding determines the amount of competition the plant has for nutrients, water and sunlight, which affects the number of leaves it is able to grow. <b>Predictions</b> The taller the plant, the more number of leaves it will have. The higher the level of crowding, the less number of leaves the plant will have.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3846903.v1
title: Danby Grassland Aster Transect Dataset

description: <b>Site Description</b>Sampling taken outdoors in the Danby grassland on the York University Keele campus. The weather was a mix of sun and clouds, 28 degrees Celsius. The grassland was a clearing with no tree canopy, and surrounded by trees and a woodlot on all sides. Samples were taken from 2:30-5:00 in the afternoon. There was continuous ground cover at the site. <b>Metadata</b> Height: The first factor is height. The height of each plant was measured in centimeters using a measuring tape. The plant was measured from the base of the stem to the top of the stem. If the plant was bending over at all, the stem was pulled straight and taught alongside the vertical measuring tape. No broken-stemmed plants were included in the data. Level of Crowding: The second factor is level of crowding. Crowding was measured on a scale from 0-3, based on the following definitions: 0 = open, 1 = some plants nearby, 2 = quite a few plants nearby, and 3 = very crowded bunch of plants, all within 50cm of the plant of interest. Number of leaves: The number of leaves is the response. We counted all the leaves on every stem of the plant (including if the stem branched into 2 or more separate stems), including both dead and living leaves. Size was not relevant when counting. We included broken/partial leaves as well in our count. <b>Methods</b> A 30-metre transect was placed randomly in the Danby grassland, and was extended on a straight path to a length of 25 metres. I then walked along the transect, beginning at 0m. Each time an individual of the plant species I was sampling was spotted, I stopped and took measurements. 20 plants in total were measured using random sampling. The plant species was identified based on its purple flowers, as well as its leaf shape and characteristics, having one very defined midrib and pointed apex, for plants that had no flowers. Individual plants were determined by observing that each plant had one steam directed into the ground, so even if a plant had multiple stems branching off of the stem going into the ground, all of the branching stems were considered one plant. <b>Hypothesis</b> The height and level of crowding of a plant affect the number of leaves it has. This is because the leaves grow evenly from all parts of the stem, starting just above its base, so leaf number and plant height correlate, and because the level of crowding determines the amount of competition the plant has for nutrients, water and sunlight, which affects the number of leaves it is able to grow. <b>Predictions</b> The taller the plant, the more number of leaves it will have. The higher the level of crowding, the less number of leaves the plant will have.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/jde03k
title: mea20160915_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/25u3g3
title: mea20160130_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/psxuwq
title: mea20160606_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/9w8zw5
title: mea20160709_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/7v8lfa
title: mea20150216_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3846882
title: Ecology Lab 2 - Grassland Dataset 2

description: Meta Data - Have 8 species as an error. It was only supposed to be one species recorded along the transect. <br>Species on first column identifies, in order, what species I looked at. The species were numbered from 1 - 50 to identify their own tag as a whole. <br>Distance on the transect, in cm, locates where the individual was located. It was repeated every time the species was found again along the transect. <br>Height of Individual, in cm, measured the length of each individual vertically.<br>Amount of flowers, depicted as any flowering on the species and/or individual. As a result, however, none the species had any flowers.<br>Amount of leaves, depicted as the amount of leaves branching out from the individual's stem or centre. <br>Crowd Patch Level, ranges from 0 to 3, 0 being Open, 1 being some plants nearby, 2 being quite a few plants, and 3 being very crowded bunch between 50 cm
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/s0qdtx
title: mea20160423_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3846882.v1
title: Ecology Lab 2 - Grassland Dataset 2

description: Meta Data - Have 8 species as an error. It was only supposed to be one species recorded along the transect. <br>Species on first column identifies, in order, what species I looked at. The species were numbered from 1 - 50 to identify their own tag as a whole. <br>Distance on the transect, in cm, locates where the individual was located. It was repeated every time the species was found again along the transect. <br>Height of Individual, in cm, measured the length of each individual vertically.<br>Amount of flowers, depicted as any flowering on the species and/or individual. As a result, however, none the species had any flowers.<br>Amount of leaves, depicted as the amount of leaves branching out from the individual's stem or centre. <br>Crowd Patch Level, ranges from 0 to 3, 0 being Open, 1 being some plants nearby, 2 being quite a few plants, and 3 being very crowded bunch between 50 cm
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/pmhqfr
title: mea20161012_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/shq65x
title: mea20151117_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/txdell
title: mea20160823_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/lpw6vk
title: mea20150528_03.txt.gz

description: :unav