cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7986278
title: Datasets for "Can the audience understand a business process model? Using Random Forest to classify level understandability based on personal and model factors"

description: This dataset contains evaluations of understandability incorporating audience characteristics and model characteristics.
The dataset has been collected in two conducted experiments. Audience' data was collected using students computing science and business and management students.


The main_dataset.csv file contains the dataset to build the predictive model.


The final_validation_dataset.csv file contains the dataset to evaluate the performance of the predictive model.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7986358
title: Results of cross-validation by Mlflow for "Can the audience understand a business process model? Using Random Forest to classify level understandability based on personal and model factors"

description: This dataset of results contains a summary of the evaluation metrics for each fold, including information about hyperparameter tuning.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7986359
title: Results of cross-validation by Mlflow for "Can the audience understand a business process model? Using Random Forest to classify level understandability based on personal and model factors"

description: This dataset of results contains a summary of the evaluation metrics for each fold, including information about hyperparameter tuning.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10065891
title: Planetary perturbers: Flaring star-planet interactions in Kepler and TESS

description: This data set contains:

a.  almost 13,000 de-trended Kepler and TESS light curves used in the publication with the same title (Ilin et al. 2024). Each light curve is a fits file with the Kepler or TESS identifier, Quarter or Sector, and, if there are multiuple light curves per Quarter/Sector, the number of the light curve. The light curves can be read with any fits file handler (e.g., astropy), or with the lightkurve package. Each light curve contains arrays for the flux, detrended flux, time, and orbital phase of the innermost planet. Note that for transiting planets the orbital phase is set to zero around transit midtime, while for non-transiting planets, the phase zero is set arbitrarily. There is no particular reason for splitting the data in the zip files except for easier upload.

b. Tables 1-4 from Ilin et al. (2024). Tables 1 and 3 are combined into one. Each table includes a description of its columns at the top.

Ilin et al. (2024) Ilin, E., Poppenhäger, K., Chebly, J., Ilić, N., Alvarado-Gómez, J.~D.

Planetary perturbers: flaring star-planet interactions in Kepler and TESS.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 527, 3395–3417.

doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3398
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8355002
title: Planetary perturbers: Flaring star-planet interactions in Kepler and TESS

description: This data set contains:

a.  almost 13,000 de-trended Kepler and TESS light curves used in the publication with the same title (Ilin et al. 2024). Each light curve is a fits file with the Kepler or TESS identifier, Quarter or Sector, and, if there are multiuple light curves per Quarter/Sector, the number of the light curve. The light curves can be read with any fits file handler (e.g., astropy), or with the lightkurve package. Each light curve contains arrays for the flux, detrended flux, time, and orbital phase of the innermost planet. Note that for transiting planets the orbital phase is set to zero around transit midtime, while for non-transiting planets, the phase zero is set arbitrarily. There is no particular reason for splitting the data in the zip files except for easier upload.

b. Tables 1-4 from Ilin et al. (2024). Tables 1 and 3 are combined into one. Each table includes a description of its columns at the top.

Ilin et al. (2024) Ilin, E., Poppenhäger, K., Chebly, J., Ilić, N., Alvarado-Gómez, J.~D.

Planetary perturbers: flaring star-planet interactions in Kepler and TESS.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 527, 3395–3417.

doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3398
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24712081.v2
title: Supplementary Materials from Ripple effects in a communication network: anti-eavesdropper defence elicits elaborated sexual signals in rival males

description: Contains a pdf with further descriptions of methodology along with supplementary tables and figures. There is a Readme file that outlines the remaining files in the ESM zip file. These files are contained in separate folders as follows: 1) Audio playback files used in experiments, 2) Data from all experiments and calibrations, and 3) Scripts used in R for data analysis and visualization. Descriptions of individual files can be found in the Readme document.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24712081
title: Supplementary Materials from Ripple effects in a communication network: anti-eavesdropper defence elicits elaborated sexual signals in rival males

description: Contains a pdf with further descriptions of methodology along with supplementary tables and figures. There is a Readme file that outlines the remaining files in the ESM zip file. These files are contained in separate folders as follows: 1) Audio playback files used in experiments, 2) Data from all experiments and calibrations, and 3) Scripts used in R for data analysis and visualization. Descriptions of individual files can be found in the Readme document.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24712081.v1
title: Supplementary Materials from Ripple effects in a communication network: anti-eavesdropper defence elicits elaborated sexual signals in rival males

description: Contains a pdf with further descriptions of methodology along with supplementary tables and figures. There is a Readme file that outlines the remaining files in the ESM zip file. These files are contained in separate folders as follows: 1) Audio playback files used in experiments, 2) Data from all experiments and calibrations, and 3) Scripts used in R for data analysis and visualization. Descriptions of individual files can be found in the Readme document.
DOI: 10.5066/p9ssek1i
title: Generalized lithology for lithogeochemical classification of the bedrock of Vermont

description: This data release provides a generalized lithology look-up table for the lithogeochemical classification of Vermont's bedrock geologic map units. The table is defined from the mapped bedrock geologic units published by Ratcliffe and others (2011) and the generalized lithology of rock group A and rock group B for lithogeochemical classification as defined by Robinson and Kapo (2003). The 2003 classification was created for all six New England states and Vermont's geologic units were based on an older, less detailed, bedrock map of Vermont by Doll and others (1961). The new data table in this data release is designed to be joined with the published attribute table from the 2011 map database, as part of the bedrock geologic map unit polygons. The join attribute is the item called "Lith" in the 2011 map database. The data table is non-interpretive and the 2011 map data were not modified. The data release contains two files, including one metadata file and one comma-delimited (CSV) file: VTcontax_attrib_lithology.csv.

References:
Doll, C.G., Cady, W.M., Thompson, J.B., and Billings, M.P., 1961, Centennial geologic map of Vermont: Vermont Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Map MISCMAP-01, scale 1:250,000.

Ratcliffe, N.M., Stanley, R.S., Gale, M.H., Thompson, P.J., and Walsh, G.J., 2011, Bedrock geologic map of Vermont: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3184, 3 sheets, scale 1:100,000, https://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/3184/

Robinson, G.R., Jr., and Kapo, K.E., 2003, Generalized lithology and lithogeochemical character of near-surface bedrock in the New England region: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 03-225, https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2003/of03-225/
DOI: 10.17043/tarfala-kirchner-2023-ice-off-2023-1
title: Time lapse imagery of the ice-off event at Lake Tarfala, Kebnekaise Mountains, northern Sweden, summer 2023
DOI: 10.3886/6cde-k311
title: Benin Power Compact - Off-Grid Energy Access: Interim Analysis Report
DOI: 10.3886/sm7k-en49
title: Benin Power Compact - Off-Grid Energy Access: Interim Analysis Report
DOI: 10.25318/3310073801-eng
title: Percentage of employees fully proficient in terms of skills needed in the business or organization, fourth quarter of 2023

description: Percentage of employees fully proficient in terms of skills needed in the business or organization, by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), business employment size, type of business, business activity and majority ownership, fourth quarter of 2023.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24799746
title: Darkeyeddog_data_Study3.csv from Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? Domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves

description: Comparative studies have shown that the eye morphology of primates has been shaped by a variety of selection pressures (e.g. communication, environmental factors). To comprehensively elucidate the complex links between ocular morphology and its evolutionary drive, attention should be paid to other phylogenetic groups. Here, we address a new question regarding the evolution of eye colour patterns in the oldest domesticated animal, namely, the domestic dog (<i>Canis familiaris</i>). In this study, we conducted an image analysis of dogs and their closest relatives, grey wolves (<i>Canis lupus</i>), to compare the colours of their irises, with the aim of assessing whether eye colours of dogs affect how humans perceived dogs. We found that the irises of dogs were significantly darker than those of wolves. We also found that facial images of dark-eyed dogs were perceived as more friendly and immature, potentially eliciting caregiving responses from humans. Our findings are consistent with our expectation that humans favour dark-eyed dogs over light-eyed ones and provide an updated hypothesis that dogs with dark eyes may have evolved by acquiring a facial trait that sends a non-threatening gaze signal to humans.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24799746.v2
title: Darkeyeddog_data_Study3.csv from Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? Domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves

description: Comparative studies have shown that the eye morphology of primates has been shaped by a variety of selection pressures (e.g. communication, environmental factors). To comprehensively elucidate the complex links between ocular morphology and its evolutionary drive, attention should be paid to other phylogenetic groups. Here, we address a new question regarding the evolution of eye colour patterns in the oldest domesticated animal, namely, the domestic dog (<i>Canis familiaris</i>). In this study, we conducted an image analysis of dogs and their closest relatives, grey wolves (<i>Canis lupus</i>), to compare the colours of their irises, with the aim of assessing whether eye colours of dogs affect how humans perceived dogs. We found that the irises of dogs were significantly darker than those of wolves. We also found that facial images of dark-eyed dogs were perceived as more friendly and immature, potentially eliciting caregiving responses from humans. Our findings are consistent with our expectation that humans favour dark-eyed dogs over light-eyed ones and provide an updated hypothesis that dogs with dark eyes may have evolved by acquiring a facial trait that sends a non-threatening gaze signal to humans.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24799749
title: Darkeyeddog_data_Study1.csv from Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? Domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves

description: Comparative studies have shown that the eye morphology of primates has been shaped by a variety of selection pressures (e.g. communication, environmental factors). To comprehensively elucidate the complex links between ocular morphology and its evolutionary drive, attention should be paid to other phylogenetic groups. Here, we address a new question regarding the evolution of eye colour patterns in the oldest domesticated animal, namely, the domestic dog (<i>Canis familiaris</i>). In this study, we conducted an image analysis of dogs and their closest relatives, grey wolves (<i>Canis lupus</i>), to compare the colours of their irises, with the aim of assessing whether eye colours of dogs affect how humans perceived dogs. We found that the irises of dogs were significantly darker than those of wolves. We also found that facial images of dark-eyed dogs were perceived as more friendly and immature, potentially eliciting caregiving responses from humans. Our findings are consistent with our expectation that humans favour dark-eyed dogs over light-eyed ones and provide an updated hypothesis that dogs with dark eyes may have evolved by acquiring a facial trait that sends a non-threatening gaze signal to humans.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24799749.v2
title: Darkeyeddog_data_Study1.csv from Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? Domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves

description: Comparative studies have shown that the eye morphology of primates has been shaped by a variety of selection pressures (e.g. communication, environmental factors). To comprehensively elucidate the complex links between ocular morphology and its evolutionary drive, attention should be paid to other phylogenetic groups. Here, we address a new question regarding the evolution of eye colour patterns in the oldest domesticated animal, namely, the domestic dog (<i>Canis familiaris</i>). In this study, we conducted an image analysis of dogs and their closest relatives, grey wolves (<i>Canis lupus</i>), to compare the colours of their irises, with the aim of assessing whether eye colours of dogs affect how humans perceived dogs. We found that the irises of dogs were significantly darker than those of wolves. We also found that facial images of dark-eyed dogs were perceived as more friendly and immature, potentially eliciting caregiving responses from humans. Our findings are consistent with our expectation that humans favour dark-eyed dogs over light-eyed ones and provide an updated hypothesis that dogs with dark eyes may have evolved by acquiring a facial trait that sends a non-threatening gaze signal to humans.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24799755
title: Darkeyeddog_data_Study2.csv from Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? Domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves

description: Comparative studies have shown that the eye morphology of primates has been shaped by a variety of selection pressures (e.g. communication, environmental factors). To comprehensively elucidate the complex links between ocular morphology and its evolutionary drive, attention should be paid to other phylogenetic groups. Here, we address a new question regarding the evolution of eye colour patterns in the oldest domesticated animal, namely, the domestic dog (<i>Canis familiaris</i>). In this study, we conducted an image analysis of dogs and their closest relatives, grey wolves (<i>Canis lupus</i>), to compare the colours of their irises, with the aim of assessing whether eye colours of dogs affect how humans perceived dogs. We found that the irises of dogs were significantly darker than those of wolves. We also found that facial images of dark-eyed dogs were perceived as more friendly and immature, potentially eliciting caregiving responses from humans. Our findings are consistent with our expectation that humans favour dark-eyed dogs over light-eyed ones and provide an updated hypothesis that dogs with dark eyes may have evolved by acquiring a facial trait that sends a non-threatening gaze signal to humans.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24799746.v1
title: Darkeyeddog_data_Study3.csv from Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans?: domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves

description: Comparative studies have shown that the eye morphology of primates has been shaped by a variety of selection pressures (e.g. communication, environmental factors). To comprehensively elucidate the complex links between ocular morphology and its evolutionary drive, attention should be paid to other phylogenetic groups. Here, we address a new question regarding the evolution of eye colour patterns in the oldest domesticated animal, namely, the domestic dog (<i>Canis familiaris</i>). In this study, we conducted an image analysis of dogs and their closest relatives, grey wolves (<i>Canis lupus</i>), to compare the colours of their irises, with the aim of assessing whether eye colours of dogs affect how humans perceived dogs. We found that the irises of dogs were significantly darker than those of wolves. We also found that facial images of dark-eyed dogs were perceived as more friendly and immature, potentially eliciting caregiving responses from humans. Our findings are consistent with our expectation that humans favour dark-eyed dogs over light-eyed ones and provide an updated hypothesis that dogs with dark eyes may have evolved by acquiring a facial trait that sends a non-threatening gaze signal to humans.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24799749.v1
title: Darkeyeddog_data_Study1.csv from Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans?: domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves

description: Comparative studies have shown that the eye morphology of primates has been shaped by a variety of selection pressures (e.g. communication, environmental factors). To comprehensively elucidate the complex links between ocular morphology and its evolutionary drive, attention should be paid to other phylogenetic groups. Here, we address a new question regarding the evolution of eye colour patterns in the oldest domesticated animal, namely, the domestic dog (<i>Canis familiaris</i>). In this study, we conducted an image analysis of dogs and their closest relatives, grey wolves (<i>Canis lupus</i>), to compare the colours of their irises, with the aim of assessing whether eye colours of dogs affect how humans perceived dogs. We found that the irises of dogs were significantly darker than those of wolves. We also found that facial images of dark-eyed dogs were perceived as more friendly and immature, potentially eliciting caregiving responses from humans. Our findings are consistent with our expectation that humans favour dark-eyed dogs over light-eyed ones and provide an updated hypothesis that dogs with dark eyes may have evolved by acquiring a facial trait that sends a non-threatening gaze signal to humans.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24799755.v2
title: Darkeyeddog_data_Study2.csv from Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? Domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves

description: Comparative studies have shown that the eye morphology of primates has been shaped by a variety of selection pressures (e.g. communication, environmental factors). To comprehensively elucidate the complex links between ocular morphology and its evolutionary drive, attention should be paid to other phylogenetic groups. Here, we address a new question regarding the evolution of eye colour patterns in the oldest domesticated animal, namely, the domestic dog (<i>Canis familiaris</i>). In this study, we conducted an image analysis of dogs and their closest relatives, grey wolves (<i>Canis lupus</i>), to compare the colours of their irises, with the aim of assessing whether eye colours of dogs affect how humans perceived dogs. We found that the irises of dogs were significantly darker than those of wolves. We also found that facial images of dark-eyed dogs were perceived as more friendly and immature, potentially eliciting caregiving responses from humans. Our findings are consistent with our expectation that humans favour dark-eyed dogs over light-eyed ones and provide an updated hypothesis that dogs with dark eyes may have evolved by acquiring a facial trait that sends a non-threatening gaze signal to humans.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24799758
title: Supplemental material1_BreedStandard.xlsx from Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? Domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves

description: Comparative studies have shown that the eye morphology of primates has been shaped by a variety of selection pressures (e.g. communication, environmental factors). To comprehensively elucidate the complex links between ocular morphology and its evolutionary drive, attention should be paid to other phylogenetic groups. Here, we address a new question regarding the evolution of eye colour patterns in the oldest domesticated animal, namely, the domestic dog (<i>Canis familiaris</i>). In this study, we conducted an image analysis of dogs and their closest relatives, grey wolves (<i>Canis lupus</i>), to compare the colours of their irises, with the aim of assessing whether eye colours of dogs affect how humans perceived dogs. We found that the irises of dogs were significantly darker than those of wolves. We also found that facial images of dark-eyed dogs were perceived as more friendly and immature, potentially eliciting caregiving responses from humans. Our findings are consistent with our expectation that humans favour dark-eyed dogs over light-eyed ones and provide an updated hypothesis that dogs with dark eyes may have evolved by acquiring a facial trait that sends a non-threatening gaze signal to humans.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24799758.v2
title: Supplemental material1_BreedStandard.xlsx from Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? Domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves

description: Comparative studies have shown that the eye morphology of primates has been shaped by a variety of selection pressures (e.g. communication, environmental factors). To comprehensively elucidate the complex links between ocular morphology and its evolutionary drive, attention should be paid to other phylogenetic groups. Here, we address a new question regarding the evolution of eye colour patterns in the oldest domesticated animal, namely, the domestic dog (<i>Canis familiaris</i>). In this study, we conducted an image analysis of dogs and their closest relatives, grey wolves (<i>Canis lupus</i>), to compare the colours of their irises, with the aim of assessing whether eye colours of dogs affect how humans perceived dogs. We found that the irises of dogs were significantly darker than those of wolves. We also found that facial images of dark-eyed dogs were perceived as more friendly and immature, potentially eliciting caregiving responses from humans. Our findings are consistent with our expectation that humans favour dark-eyed dogs over light-eyed ones and provide an updated hypothesis that dogs with dark eyes may have evolved by acquiring a facial trait that sends a non-threatening gaze signal to humans.