cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr38021
title: Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2019
title: Archival Version

description: These data, collected to assist in the development of sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2019. The United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt, number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense, annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national security. Organizational defendants data, 2019, covers fiscal year October 1, 2018, through September 30, 2019.
description: Datasets: DS1: Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2019
description: All cases received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had sentencing dates between October 1, 2018 and September 30, 2019 and were assessed as constitutional. Smallest Geographic Unit: federal court district
description: Starting with the 1999 data, ICPSR archives ORGANIZATIONS CONVICTED IN FEDERAL CRIMINAL COURTS under a new study number for each year of data. Data for the years 1987-1998 are archived in ORGANIZATIONS CONVICTED IN FEDERAL CRIMINAL COURTS, 1987-1998 (ICPSR 9513).
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13316661
title: National Checklists: Jamaica Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14837471
title: National Checklists: Jamaica Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr38551
title: Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2020
title: Archival Version

description: These data, collected to assist in the development of sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2020. The United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt, number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense, annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national security. Organizational defendants data, 2020, covers fiscal year October 1, 2019, through September 30, 2020.
description: Datasets: DS1: Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2020
description: All cases received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had sentencing dates between October 1, 2019 and September 30, 2020 and were assessed as constitutional. Smallest Geographic Unit: federal court district
description: Starting with the 1999 data, ICPSR archives ORGANIZATIONS CONVICTED IN FEDERAL CRIMINAL COURTS under a new study number for each year of data. Data for the years 1987-1998 are archived in ORGANIZATIONS CONVICTED IN FEDERAL CRIMINAL COURTS, 1987-1998 (ICPSR 9513).
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13316792
title: National Checklists: China Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13316793
title: National Checklists 2019: China Species List

description: Lists of taxa for each country and a few other administrative zones harvested from effechecka using simplified versions of geonames polygons. See https://github.com/diatomsRcool/checklists for details.
A list of species from China collected using effechecka and geonames polygons
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14836717
title: National Checklists: China Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr06487
title: Metro Court Project: A Study of Mediation and Adjudication in Bernalillo County (Albuquerque), New Mexico, Small Claims Court, 1990-1992
title: Archival Version

description: This study used court records and interviews with disputants, litigants, and mediators in Bernalillo County, New Mexico, to compare the effects of ethnicity and gender in mediated versus adjudicated small claims disputes. Initial structured telephone interviews with both adjudicated and mediated claimants and respondents (Parts 1-4) were conducted. Follow-up questionnaires (Parts 6-8) were then administered to the initial interviewed groups. Data from mediators (Part 9) were collected from self-administered structured questionnaires. Pertinent questions from all eight survey instruments were combined into a master file (Part 5). This data collection also includes two qualitative summary files of adjudicated and mediated cases (Parts 10-11). The unit of analysis is the small claims case.
description: Datasets: 
 
 DS0: Study-Level Files 
 DS1: Mediated Case Telephone Questionnaire for Respondent 
 DS2: Mediated Case Telephone Questionnaire for Claimant 
 DS3: Adjudicated Case Telephone Questionnaire for Respondent With a Hearing 
 DS4: Adjudicated Case Telephone Questionnaire for Claimant With a Hearing 
 DS5: Master File 
 DS6: Follow-Up Questionnaire, Adjudicated, Respondent and Claimant 
 DS7: Follow-Up Questionnaire, Mediation/Agreement Reached, Respondent and Claimant 
 DS8: Follow-Up Questionnaire, Mediation/No Agreement Reached - Respondent and Claimant 
 DS9: Exit Questionnaire for Mediators 
 DS10: Qualitative Data: Summary of Each Mediated Case in Master File 
 DS11: Qualitative Data: Summary of Each Adjudicated Case in Master File 
 DS13: SAS Data Definition Statements for Part 1 
 DS14: SAS Data Definition Statements for Part 2 
 DS15: SAS Data Definition Statements for Part 3 
 DS16: SAS Data Definition Statements for Part 4 
 DS17: SAS Data Definition Statements for Part 5 
 DS18: SAS Data Definition Statements for Part 6 
 DS19: SAS Data Definition Statements for Part 7 
 DS20: SAS Data Definition Statements for Part 8 
 DS21: SAS Data Definition Statements for Part 9
description: (1) Parts 10 and 11 of this collection are text files that are qualitative summaries of mediated and adjudicated cases. (2) The original questionnaires are available only in hardcopy form upon request from ICPSR.
description: All non-eviction small claims cases (less than $5,000) with adult individuals, married couples, or businesses on both sides that proceeded to hearing or mediation with both parties present.
description: A random selection of adjudicated cases and a random assignment of answered claims to mediation.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr26201
title: Federal Justice Statistics Program: Criminal Appeals Cases Filed in Courts of Appeals, 2008
title: Archival Version

description: The data contain records of criminal appeals cases filed in United States Courts of Appeals during fiscal year 2008. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States Courts' (AOUSC) Court of Appeals file. These contain variables on the nature of the criminal appeal, the underlying offense, and the disposition of the appeal. An appeal can be filed by the government or the offender, and the appellant can appeal the sentence, the verdict, or both sentence and verdict. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 6.1-6.5. Variables containing information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
description: Datasets: DS1: Federal Justice Statistics Program: Criminal Appeals Cases Filed in Courts of Appeals, 2008
description: Criminal appeals cases filed in United States Courts of Appeals during fiscal year 2008.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr37284
title: Improving Hot Spot Policing through Behavioral Interventions, New York City, 2012-2018
title: Archival Version

description: This project aimed to develop new insights into offender decision-making in hot spots in New York City, and to test whether these insights could inform interventions to reduce crime in hot spots. There were two phases to the project. In the first phase a set of hypotheses were developed about offender decision-making based on semi-structured interviews with individuals who were currently incarcerated, formerly incarcerated individuals, individuals currently on probation, and community members of high crime areas with no justice-involvement. These interviews suggested several factors worthy of further testing. For instance, offenders believed they were less likely to get away with a crime if they knew more about the officers in their community. That is, when police officers were less anonymous, offenders were less likely to go forward with a crime. In the second phase a field intervention was developed and conducted to test whether reducing officer anonymity might deter crime. Through a randomized controlled trial (RCT) while working with NYPD neighborhood coordination officers, who work in New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) developments, it was tested whether sending information about officers to residents in housing developments would deter crime in those developments.
description: To develop a better understanding of offender decision making through interviews, surveys, and a behavioral intervention to increase familiarity with local law enforcement.
description: Randomized field trials and surveys following a behavioral intervention.
description: Dataset 1 contains variables on NYCHA developments in New York City, including demographics, location, population, and crime incidents near the developments. Dataset 2 contains scale variables concerning feelings towards neigborhood police officers, job performance, response rate, and familiarity with those officers. It also includes items on demographics, residence, development statistics, and survey-related variables for researchers.
description: Datasets: DS0: Study-Level Files DS1: NYCHA Development Data DS2: Survey Data for NIJ
description: face-to-face interview
description: on-site questionnaire
description: Adult public housing residents, adult ex-offenders, adult probationers, and adult incarcerated population in New York City.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14837596
title: National Checklists: Macau Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr26202
title: Federal Justice Statistics Program: Criminal Appeals Cases in Courts of Appeals -- Terminated, 2008
title: Archival Version

description: The data contain records of criminal appeals cases terminated in United States Courts of Appeals during fiscal year 2008. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States Courts' (AOUSC) Court of Appeals file. These contain variables on the nature of the criminal appeal, the underlying offense, and the disposition of the appeal. An appeal can be filed by the government or the offender, and the appellant can appeal the sentence, the verdict, or both sentence and verdict. Appeals may be terminated on the merits or on procedural grounds. Of those that are terminated on the merits, the district court ruling may be affirmed, reversed, remanded to criminal court, or dismissed. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 6.1-6.5. Variables containing information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
description: Datasets: DS1: Federal Justice Statistics Program: Criminal Appeals Cases in Courts of Appeals -- Terminated, 2008
description: Criminal appeals cases terminated in United States Courts of Appeals during fiscal year 2008.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr29403
title: Federal Justice Statistics Program: Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases in District Court -- Pending, 2008 [United States]
title: Archival Version

description: The data contain records of defendants in criminal cases filed in United States District Court before or during fiscal year 2008 and still pending as of year-end. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States District Courts' (AOUSC) criminal file. Defendants in criminal cases may be either individuals or corporations. There is one record for each defendant in each case filed. Included in the records are data from court proceedings and offense codes for up to five offenses charged at the time the case was filed. (The most serious charge at termination may differ from the most serious charge at case filing, due to plea bargaining or action of the judge or jury.) In a case with multiple charges against the defendant, a "most serious" offense charge is determined by a hierarchy of offenses based on statutory maximum penalties associated with the charges. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 4.1-4.5 and 5.1-5.6. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
description: Datasets: DS1: Federal Justice Statistics Program: Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases in District Court -- Pending, 2008 [United States]
description: Criminal cases filed in United States District Court during fiscal year 2008 and still pending as of year-end.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr29404
title: Federal Justice Statistics Program: Offenders Admitted to Prison, 2008
title: Archival Version

description: The data contain records of sentenced offenders committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) during fiscal year 2008. The data include commitments of United States District Court, violators of conditions of release (e.g., parole, probation, or supervised release violators), offenders convicted in other courts (e.g., military or District of Columbia courts), and persons admitted to prison as material witnesses or for purposes of treatment, examination, or transfer to another authority. These data include variables that describe the offender, such as age, race, citizenship, as well as variables that describe the sentences and expected prison terms. The data file contains original variables from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY database, as well as "SAF" variables that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 7.9-7.16. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
description: Datasets: DS1: Federal Justice Statistics Program: Offenders Admitted to Prison, 2008
description: Offenders in the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons during fiscal year 2008.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr29406
title: Federal Justice Statistics Program: Offenders in Prison at Year-End, 2008
title: Archival Version

description: The data contain records of sentenced offenders in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) at year-end of fiscal year 2008. The data include commitments of United States District Court, violators of conditions of release (e.g., parole, probation, or supervised release violators), offenders convicted in other courts (e.g., military or District of Columbia courts), and persons admitted to prison as material witnesses or for purposes of treatment, examination, or transfer to another authority. These data include variables that describe the offender, such as age, race, citizenship, as well as variables that describe the sentences and expected prison terms. The data file contains original variables from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY database, as well as "SAF" variables that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 7.9-7.16. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
description: Datasets: DS1: Federal Justice Statistics Program: Offenders in Prison at Year-End, 2008
description: Offenders in the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons at year-end of fiscal year 2008.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr29421
title: Federal Justice Statistics Program: Charges Filed Against Defendants in Criminal Cases in District Court, 2008 [United States]
title: Archival Version

description: The data contain records of charges filed against defendants whose cases were filed by United States attorneys in United States district court during fiscal year 2008. The data are charge-level records, and more than one charge may be filed against a single defendant. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central Charge file. The charge-level data may be linked to defendant-level data (extracted from the EOUSA Central System file) through the CS_SEQ variable, and it should be noted that some defendants may not have any charges other than the lead charge appearing on the defendant-level record. The Central Charge and Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
description: Datasets: DS1: Federal Justice Statistics Program: Charges Filed Against Defendants in Criminal Cases in District Court, 2008 [United States]
description: Charges filed against defendants in United States district court during fiscal year 2008.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr29423
title: Federal Justice Statistics Program: Charges Filed Against Defendants in Criminal Cases in District Court -- Terminated, 2008 [United States]
title: Archival Version

description: The data contain records of charges filed against defendants whose cases were terminated by United States attorneys in United States district court during fiscal year 2008. The data are charge-level records, and more than one charge may be filed against a single defendant. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central Charge file. The charge-level data may be linked to defendant-level data (extracted from the EOUSA Central System file) through the CS_SEQ variable, and it should be noted that some defendants may not have any charges other than the lead charge appearing on the defendant-level record. The Central Charge and Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
description: Datasets: DS1: Federal Justice Statistics Program: Charges Filed Against Defendants in Criminal Cases in District Court -- Terminated, 2008 [United States]
description: Charges filed against defendants whose cases were terminated in United States district court during fiscal year 2008.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13317937
title: National Checklists: Réunion Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk