cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.15468/dl.u8fu2c
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 1154 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "BasisOfRecord is one of (Human Observation, Occurrence evidence)",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 "TaxonKey is Terminalia arjuna (Roxb.) Wight & Arn."
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 1154 records from 25 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0028599-241126133413365/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.886spx
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 260 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "BasisOfRecord is one of (Human Observation, Occurrence evidence)",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 "TaxonKey is Vigna trilobata (L.) Verdc."
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 260 records from 4 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0028603-241126133413365/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.qny6yb
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 4207 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "BasisOfRecord is one of (Human Observation, Occurrence evidence)",
 "HasCoordinate is true",
 "HasGeospatialIssue is false",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 "TaxonKey is Gloriosa superba L."
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 4207 records from 64 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0028602-241126133413365/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.15468/dl.qgahbg
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 1981 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "TaxonKey" : [
 "is Euleptes europaea (Gené, 1839)"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 1981 records from 100 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0028605-241126133413365/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.27993506.v2
title: Catalog of stool metagenome-assembled genomes from patients with different cancer types

description: A non-redundant catalog of 3,816 genomes with at least 75% completeness and no more than 15% contamination assembled from metagenomes. Samples of 976 metagenomes were obtained from patients receiving immunotherapy for the treatment of different types of cancers.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25314724
title: Spinal manipulation does not improve short-term pain and function in persons with painful shoulder: a systematic review with meta-analysis

description: To investigate the benefit of spinal high-velocity low-amplitude thrust (HVLAT) in improving pain and disability in persons with painful shoulder as primary outcomes. Function, quality of life, persons (and clinicians) satisfaction, adverse events rate, and time for recovery were secondary outcomes. A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted and MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Embase, and PEDro until 20 September 2023 were investigated. Two thousand eight hundred and ninety-nine records were retrieved and nine studies were included. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed through the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The certainty of evidence of the pooled results was graded with GRADE approach. The analysis included nine studies (441 persons). The pooled results showed non-significant differences between HVLAT versus sham in pain at pre-post follow-up (MD −0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.60; 0.35; <i>p</i> = 0.61, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%), and at &lt;4 days follow-up (SMD 0.16, 95%CI −0.16; 0.48; <i>p</i> = 0.34, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 23%); in function at &lt;4 days follow-up (SMD −0.29, 95%CI −0.69; 0.11; <i>p</i> = 0.16, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 50%). The certainty of evidence ranged from low to very low. HVLAT was not more effective than sham in improving pain and function at pre-post and at &lt;4 days follow-up. When used as an “add-on technique”, HVLAT did not improve pain nor disability. High-velocity low-amplitude thrust (HVLAT) manipulation is no more effective than sham in improving shoulder pain at pre-post follow-up.Clinician should not be recommended to deliver HVLAT manipulation in subjects with painful shoulder with the purpose of reducing pain intensity.However, HVLAT manipulation should be considered within a multimodal approach to address function in painful shoulder subjects. High-velocity low-amplitude thrust (HVLAT) manipulation is no more effective than sham in improving shoulder pain at pre-post follow-up. Clinician should not be recommended to deliver HVLAT manipulation in subjects with painful shoulder with the purpose of reducing pain intensity. However, HVLAT manipulation should be considered within a multimodal approach to address function in painful shoulder subjects.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25314724.v1
title: Spinal manipulation does not improve short-term pain and function in persons with painful shoulder: a systematic review with meta-analysis

description: To investigate the benefit of spinal high-velocity low-amplitude thrust (HVLAT) in improving pain and disability in persons with painful shoulder as primary outcomes. Function, quality of life, persons (and clinicians) satisfaction, adverse events rate, and time for recovery were secondary outcomes. A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted and MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Embase, and PEDro until 20 September 2023 were investigated. Two thousand eight hundred and ninety-nine records were retrieved and nine studies were included. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed through the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The certainty of evidence of the pooled results was graded with GRADE approach. The analysis included nine studies (441 persons). The pooled results showed non-significant differences between HVLAT versus sham in pain at pre-post follow-up (MD −0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.60; 0.35; <i>p</i> = 0.61, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%), and at &lt;4 days follow-up (SMD 0.16, 95%CI −0.16; 0.48; <i>p</i> = 0.34, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 23%); in function at &lt;4 days follow-up (SMD −0.29, 95%CI −0.69; 0.11; <i>p</i> = 0.16, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 50%). The certainty of evidence ranged from low to very low. HVLAT was not more effective than sham in improving pain and function at pre-post and at &lt;4 days follow-up. When used as an “add-on technique”, HVLAT did not improve pain nor disability. High-velocity low-amplitude thrust (HVLAT) manipulation is no more effective than sham in improving shoulder pain at pre-post follow-up.Clinician should not be recommended to deliver HVLAT manipulation in subjects with painful shoulder with the purpose of reducing pain intensity.However, HVLAT manipulation should be considered within a multimodal approach to address function in painful shoulder subjects. High-velocity low-amplitude thrust (HVLAT) manipulation is no more effective than sham in improving shoulder pain at pre-post follow-up. Clinician should not be recommended to deliver HVLAT manipulation in subjects with painful shoulder with the purpose of reducing pain intensity. However, HVLAT manipulation should be considered within a multimodal approach to address function in painful shoulder subjects.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25310644
title: Riding waves to improve functioning: a quantitative evaluation of a Surf Week in individuals with chronic phase brain injury with six months follow-up

description: Environmental enrichment seems to enable people in the chronic phase of acquired brain injury (ABI) to experience new functional abilities and motor/coping strategies and consequently to become more adaptable which might prevent/reverse functional decline. This study describes the influence of a five-days Surf Week program on participants on physical function, self-efficacy, functional balance performance and self-perceived recovery. A multiple-baseline single-case design was used. Adults participating in the Surf Week in chronic phase of ABI were eligible to participate. Participants completed a battery of tests monitoring physical function, self-efficacy, functional balance performance and self-perceived recovery. This battery was repeated 5 times over a 1-year period, two times pre-Surf Week, three times post-Surf Week. Visual data inspection with two non-overlap methods were used to determine if patients showed sustained improvement in outcomes post-intervention. A moderate to strong indication for improvements on physical function, functional balance performance and self-perceived recovery exists till six months follow-up. No indication was observed on self-efficacy till six months follow-up. A five-days Surf Week is a physically, cognitively and socially intensive stimulating activity that can positively challenge individuals after ABI and seems to improve physical functioning, functional balance performance and self-perceived recovery. Surf therapy, if appropriate measures are taken, is a safe yet physically, cognitively and socially intensive stimulating intervention that capitalizes on enriched environment principles, and might address the holistic needs in this population.Surf therapy might positively influence physical function, balance and self-perceived recovery in adults with acquired brain injury in the chronic phase.Rehabilitation professionals should experience/explore with their patients with acquired brain injury challenging (group) outdoors activities such as these, aiming to meet patients’ needs, interests, or values in the chronic phase of recovery, and so create successfully participation in activities that capitalizes on enriched environment principles. Surf therapy, if appropriate measures are taken, is a safe yet physically, cognitively and socially intensive stimulating intervention that capitalizes on enriched environment principles, and might address the holistic needs in this population. Surf therapy might positively influence physical function, balance and self-perceived recovery in adults with acquired brain injury in the chronic phase. Rehabilitation professionals should experience/explore with their patients with acquired brain injury challenging (group) outdoors activities such as these, aiming to meet patients’ needs, interests, or values in the chronic phase of recovery, and so create successfully participation in activities that capitalizes on enriched environment principles.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25310644.v1
title: Riding waves to improve functioning: a quantitative evaluation of a Surf Week in individuals with chronic phase brain injury with six months follow-up

description: Environmental enrichment seems to enable people in the chronic phase of acquired brain injury (ABI) to experience new functional abilities and motor/coping strategies and consequently to become more adaptable which might prevent/reverse functional decline. This study describes the influence of a five-days Surf Week program on participants on physical function, self-efficacy, functional balance performance and self-perceived recovery. A multiple-baseline single-case design was used. Adults participating in the Surf Week in chronic phase of ABI were eligible to participate. Participants completed a battery of tests monitoring physical function, self-efficacy, functional balance performance and self-perceived recovery. This battery was repeated 5 times over a 1-year period, two times pre-Surf Week, three times post-Surf Week. Visual data inspection with two non-overlap methods were used to determine if patients showed sustained improvement in outcomes post-intervention. A moderate to strong indication for improvements on physical function, functional balance performance and self-perceived recovery exists till six months follow-up. No indication was observed on self-efficacy till six months follow-up. A five-days Surf Week is a physically, cognitively and socially intensive stimulating activity that can positively challenge individuals after ABI and seems to improve physical functioning, functional balance performance and self-perceived recovery. Surf therapy, if appropriate measures are taken, is a safe yet physically, cognitively and socially intensive stimulating intervention that capitalizes on enriched environment principles, and might address the holistic needs in this population.Surf therapy might positively influence physical function, balance and self-perceived recovery in adults with acquired brain injury in the chronic phase.Rehabilitation professionals should experience/explore with their patients with acquired brain injury challenging (group) outdoors activities such as these, aiming to meet patients’ needs, interests, or values in the chronic phase of recovery, and so create successfully participation in activities that capitalizes on enriched environment principles. Surf therapy, if appropriate measures are taken, is a safe yet physically, cognitively and socially intensive stimulating intervention that capitalizes on enriched environment principles, and might address the holistic needs in this population. Surf therapy might positively influence physical function, balance and self-perceived recovery in adults with acquired brain injury in the chronic phase. Rehabilitation professionals should experience/explore with their patients with acquired brain injury challenging (group) outdoors activities such as these, aiming to meet patients’ needs, interests, or values in the chronic phase of recovery, and so create successfully participation in activities that capitalizes on enriched environment principles.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25334276
title: Exercise or mind-body exercises for psychiatry symptoms and quality of life in schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders: an overview of systematic reviews with meta-analysis

description: This overview of systematic reviews with meta-analysis aimed to summarize the effects of exercise, regular physical activity, and mind-body exercises on negative symptoms, depression symptoms, and quality of life in schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders. The CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched up to November 10, 2023. AMSTAR 2 was used and the overlap between reviews was calculated. Eighteen reviews were included. No reviews meta-analyzed regular physical activity. Aerobic exercise may be more effective than yoga, treatment-as-usual, or multiple controls for reducing negative symptoms. Tai chi may be more effective than multiple controls for decreasing negative symptoms. Aerobic exercise or multimodal exercise programs may be more effective than multiple controls for reducing depression symptoms. Yoga may be more effective than waitlist for decreasing depression symptoms. Aerobic exercise may be more effective than multiple controls for improving quality of life. Yoga may be more effective than treatment-as-usual for improving quality of life. The rest of the meta-analyses found no differences between groups or combined different types of interventions in their meta-analyses. Despite these results, important methodological concerns were detected that precluded us from making sound clinical recommendations. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7V5QZ. This overview of reviews evaluates exercise and mind-body exercise for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders.Aerobic exercise or tai chi may reduce negative symptoms in these psychiatric disorders.Yoga may reduce depression symptoms and improve quality of life in these psychiatric disorders. This overview of reviews evaluates exercise and mind-body exercise for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Aerobic exercise or tai chi may reduce negative symptoms in these psychiatric disorders. Yoga may reduce depression symptoms and improve quality of life in these psychiatric disorders.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25347546
title: Aphasia disrupts usual care: “I’m not mad, I’m not deaf” – the experiences of individuals with aphasia and family members in hospital

description: Communication difficulties are highly prevalent in the stroke population, with implications for patient experience, safety and outcomes. This study explores the experiences of people with aphasia and family members regarding healthcare communication in acute and subacute stroke settings. A phenomenological approach was used to understand participants’ experiences. Participants took part in a focus group and data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach. For individuals with aphasia (<i>n</i> = 4) and family members (<i>n</i> = 2), five themes were generated: “aphasia makes it hard to communicate,” “hospital staff focus on the patient’s medical status only,” “people with aphasia do not get the help they need to improve,” “staff lack the skills to communicate with people with aphasia,” and “staff are crucial to improving healthcare communication.” The stroke team has expertise in the medical management of stroke but struggle to communicate with patients with aphasia. Patients’ experience of healthcare communication is often one-way and limited to following instructions, with missed opportunities to discuss core topics such as prognosis, rehabilitation, and person-specific needs. Patients and families assert that all members of the stroke healthcare team should be able to adapt communication to accommodate patients. Person-centred care is not a reality for many patients with aphasia.Many healthcare conversations, including informal assessments and discussing prognosis, are not accessible for people with aphasia.Consequently, for people with aphasia, healthcare in hospital is characterised by confusion and exclusion.Staff are crucial to improving healthcare communication; when appropriate strategies were used, these were not only effective but very meaningful to patients. Person-centred care is not a reality for many patients with aphasia. Many healthcare conversations, including informal assessments and discussing prognosis, are not accessible for people with aphasia. Consequently, for people with aphasia, healthcare in hospital is characterised by confusion and exclusion. Staff are crucial to improving healthcare communication; when appropriate strategies were used, these were not only effective but very meaningful to patients.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25347546.v1
title: Aphasia disrupts usual care: “I’m not mad, I’m not deaf” – the experiences of individuals with aphasia and family members in hospital

description: Communication difficulties are highly prevalent in the stroke population, with implications for patient experience, safety and outcomes. This study explores the experiences of people with aphasia and family members regarding healthcare communication in acute and subacute stroke settings. A phenomenological approach was used to understand participants’ experiences. Participants took part in a focus group and data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach. For individuals with aphasia (<i>n</i> = 4) and family members (<i>n</i> = 2), five themes were generated: “aphasia makes it hard to communicate,” “hospital staff focus on the patient’s medical status only,” “people with aphasia do not get the help they need to improve,” “staff lack the skills to communicate with people with aphasia,” and “staff are crucial to improving healthcare communication.” The stroke team has expertise in the medical management of stroke but struggle to communicate with patients with aphasia. Patients’ experience of healthcare communication is often one-way and limited to following instructions, with missed opportunities to discuss core topics such as prognosis, rehabilitation, and person-specific needs. Patients and families assert that all members of the stroke healthcare team should be able to adapt communication to accommodate patients. Person-centred care is not a reality for many patients with aphasia.Many healthcare conversations, including informal assessments and discussing prognosis, are not accessible for people with aphasia.Consequently, for people with aphasia, healthcare in hospital is characterised by confusion and exclusion.Staff are crucial to improving healthcare communication; when appropriate strategies were used, these were not only effective but very meaningful to patients. Person-centred care is not a reality for many patients with aphasia. Many healthcare conversations, including informal assessments and discussing prognosis, are not accessible for people with aphasia. Consequently, for people with aphasia, healthcare in hospital is characterised by confusion and exclusion. Staff are crucial to improving healthcare communication; when appropriate strategies were used, these were not only effective but very meaningful to patients.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25296261
title: Development, validity and reliability of patient perception of scoliosis-specific physiotherapy (physio-is) questionnaire

description: To develop a questionnaire for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE) and to evaluate its content validity, structural validity, and reliability. Seven PSSE treatment experts checked the content validity of the Patient’s Perception of Scoliosis-Specific Physiotherapy Questionnaire (Physio-IS). For each Physio-IS item, the content validity indexes must be ≥ 90%. Regarding structural validity and reliability 52 adolescents (ages 10–17) with AIS completed the questionnaire. Structural validity was assessed through exploratory factor analysis. Reliability was verified through internal consistency. Physio-IS content was validated in three evaluation rounds, obtaining 100% expert agreement. About structural validity we identified four domains (cumulative explained variance = 68.2%): (1) specific knowledge (seven questions on understanding their scoliosis condition); (2) social repercussion (five questions about social relationship implications); (3) pain (two questions about scoliosis-associated pain); and (4) associated concern (apprehension/expectations regarding the future). The Physio-IS demonstrated very good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.76–0.92). The Physio-IS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing AIS patients undergoing PSSE and helping physiotherapists identify aspects requiring more attention, thus facilitating intervention strategies, as knowing the patient’s perception of their condition or treatment is fundamental to AIS treatment success. Physio-IS is an innovative tool in the treatment of Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).Physio-IS is a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of adolescents with AIS undergoing phyisiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE).The specific questionnaire can contribute to physiotherapeutic treatment decisions, allowing the physical therapist to see the patient as a whole. Physio-IS is an innovative tool in the treatment of Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Physio-IS is a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of adolescents with AIS undergoing phyisiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE). The specific questionnaire can contribute to physiotherapeutic treatment decisions, allowing the physical therapist to see the patient as a whole.