cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591845
title: Bees Attraction to Flower Colour

description: The experiment was conducted over a 2 day span by ecology students at York University. The first day the data was collected was on Wednesday October 14th, 2015 for 1.5 hours at approximately 2:45-4:15pm. The temperature was 10 degrees celcius and cloudy with limited sun exposure. The second day the data was collected the following week on Wednesday October 21, 2015 for the same duration (1.5 hrs) at approximately 2:50-4:20pm. The temperature was 9 degrees celcius and cloudy and slightly windy with no sun. The experiment took place in the grassland along Pond road of York University Campus. The grassland was divided into three areas: the edge, the midde and the pond. The edge represented the area towards the mowed grass. The pond represented the area closer towards the pond. The middle represented the area between the edge and the pond. On day one, 4 red pans, 4 yellow pans and 4 white pans were randomly distributed in the edge of the grassland. 4 red pans, 4 yellow pans and 4 white pans were randomly distributed in the middle of the grassland. 4 red pans, 4 yellow pans and 4 white pans were randomly distributed close to the pond of the grassland. Each pan were at least 1 meter apart from each other within each grassland. The different insect species observed within each pan was recorded and the number of each type of species recorded in each pan was counted. The same procedure was repeated for day two. A total of 72 pans were used in the entire experiment. There were equal number of pans of each colour (24 red, 24 yellow and 24 white) and they were equallly distrubuted to each grassland location.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591863.v2
title: Key beliefs influencing young drivers’ engagement with social interactive technology on their smartphones: A qualitative study

description: <b>Objective:</b> The main aim of this study was to identify young drivers’ underlying beliefs (i.e., behavioral, normative, and control) regarding initiating, monitoring/reading, and responding to social interactive technology (i.e., functions on a Smartphone that allow the user to communicate with other people). <b>Method:</b> This qualitative study was a beliefs elicitation study in accordance with the theory of planned behavior and sought to elicit young drivers’ behavioral (i.e., advantages, disadvantages), normative (i.e., who approves, who disapproves), and control beliefs (i.e., barriers, facilitators) that underpin social interactive technology use while driving. Young drivers (<i>N</i> = 26) aged 17 to 25 years took part in an interview or focus group discussion. <b>Results:</b> Though differences emerged between the 3 behaviors of initiating, monitoring/reading, and responding for each of the behavioral, normative, and control belief categories, the strongest distinction was within the behavioral beliefs category (e.g., communicating with the person that they were on the way to meet was an advantage of initiating; being able to determine whether to respond was an advantage of monitoring/reading; and communicating with important people was an advantage of responding). Normative beliefs were similar for initiating and responding behaviors (e.g., friends and peers more likely to approve than other groups) and differences emerged for monitoring/reading (e.g., parents were more likely to approve of this behavior than initiating and responding). For control beliefs, there were differences between the beliefs regarding facilitators of these behaviors (e.g., familiar roads and conditions facilitated initiating; having audible notifications of an incoming communication facilitated monitoring/reading; and receiving a communication of immediate importance facilitated responding); however, the control beliefs that presented barriers were consistent across the 3 behaviors (e.g., difficult traffic/road conditions). <b>Conclusion:</b> The current study provides an important addition to the extant literature and supports emerging research that suggests that initiating, monitoring/reading, and responding may indeed be distinct behaviors with different underlying motivations.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591842
title: Abundance of invertebrates in different grassland height in York University

description: The purpose of the experiment is to study the abundance of invertebrates in different heights of grasslands in three different areas. The areas are mowed, parking lot and unmowed. The experiment was conducted on October 13 2015 between 2:30 pm to 4:30 pm with a temprature of 17 degree celcius with continuous showers and also on October 20, 2015 from 2:30 pm to 4:30 pm with a temperature of 17 degree celcius with cloudy sky and scattered showers. Three different colours of bowls/ pan traps, blue, white and yellow were used. 6 blue, 6 white and 6 yellow pan traps were used in each area and each bowl was places 1 metre apart from each other. The total number of 18 pan traps were used in each area. The pan traps were placed with a pattern og blue, white and yellow. The pan traps were filled with soapy water to collect the invertebrates and were left for thirty minutes to get the data. The number of total invertebrates and their type was collected from each pan trap. The lab partners are Rachel, Maleeha nd Aster.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591841
title: Text file A

description: Text file A
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591863.v1
title: Key Beliefs Influencing Young Drivers' Engagement with Social Interactive Technology on their Smartphones: A Qualitative Study

description: ABSTRACT<b>Objective</b>: The main aim of this study was to identify young drivers' underlying beliefs (i.e., behavioral, normative, and control) regarding initiating, monitoring/reading, and responding to social interactive technology (i.e., functions on a Smartphone that allow the user to communicate with other people). <b>Method</b>: This qualitative study was a beliefs elicitation study in accordance with the Theory of Planned Behavior and sought to elicit young drivers' behavioral (i.e., advantages, disadvantages), normative (i.e., who approves, who disapproves), and control beliefs (i.e., barriers, facilitators) which underpin social interactive technology use while driving. Young drivers (<i>N</i> = 26) aged 17 to 25 years took part in an interview or focus group discussion. <b>Results</b>: While differences emerged between the three behaviors of initiating, monitoring/reading, and responding for each of the behavioral, normative, and control belief categories, the strongest distinction was within the behavioral beliefs category (e.g., communicating with the person that they were on the way to meet was an advantage of initiating; being able to determine whether to respond was an advantage of monitoring/reading; and communicating with important people was an advantage of responding). Normative beliefs were similar for initiating and responding behaviors (e.g., friends and peers more likely to approve than other groups) and differences emerged for monitoring/reading (e.g., parents were more likely to approve of this behavior than initiating and responding). For control beliefs, there were differences between the beliefs regarding facilitators of these behaviors (e.g., familiar roads and conditions facilitated initiating; having audible notifications of an incoming communication facilitated monitoring/reading; and receiving a communication of immediate importance facilitated responding); however, the control beliefs that presented barriers were consistent across the three behaviors (e.g., difficult traffic/road conditions). <b>Conclusion</b>: The current study provides an important addition to the extant literature and supports emerging research which suggests initiating, monitoring/reading, and responding may indeed be distinct behaviors with different underlying motivations.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591842.v1
title: Abundance of invertebrates in different grassland height in York University

description: The purpose of the experiment is to study the abundance of invertebrates in different heights of grasslands in three different areas. The areas are mowed, parking lot and unmowed. The experiment was conducted on October 13 2015 between 2:30 pm to 4:30 pm with a temprature of 17 degree celcius with continuous showers and also on October 20, 2015 from 2:30 pm to 4:30 pm with a temperature of 17 degree celcius with cloudy sky and scattered showers. Three different colours of bowls/ pan traps, blue, white and yellow were used. 6 blue, 6 white and 6 yellow pan traps were used in each area and each bowl was places 1 metre apart from each other. The total number of 18 pan traps were used in each area. The pan traps were placed with a pattern og blue, white and yellow. The pan traps were filled with soapy water to collect the invertebrates and were left for thirty minutes to get the data. The number of total invertebrates and their type was collected from each pan trap. The lab partners are Rachel, Maleeha nd Aster.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591840
title: Full dataset for Experimental and chemometric studies of cell membrane permeability

description: This file is the entire data-set for Experimental and chemometric studies of cell membrane permeability.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591841.v1
title: Text file A

description: Text file A
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591845.v1
title: Bees Attraction to Flower Colour

description: The experiment was conducted over a 2 day span by ecology students at York University. The first day the data was collected was on Wednesday October 14th, 2015 for 1.5 hours at approximately 2:45-4:15pm. The temperature was 10 degrees celcius and cloudy with limited sun exposure. The second day the data was collected the following week on Wednesday October 21, 2015 for the same duration (1.5 hrs) at approximately 2:50-4:20pm. The temperature was 9 degrees celcius and cloudy and slightly windy with no sun. The experiment took place in the grassland along Pond road of York University Campus. The grassland was divided into three areas: the edge, the midde and the pond. The edge represented the area towards the mowed grass. The pond represented the area closer towards the pond. The middle represented the area between the edge and the pond. 72 pans were used in the entire experiment. There were equal number of pans of each colour (24 red, 24 yellow and 24 white) and they were equallly distrubuted to each grassland location. 8 red pans, 8 yellow pans and 8 white pans were randomly distributed in the edge of the grassland. 8 red pans, 8 yellow pans and 8 white pans were randomly distributed in the middle of the grassland. 8 red pans, 8 yellow pans and 8 white pans were randomly distributed close to the pond of the grassland. Each pan were at least 1 meter apart from each other within each grassland. The different insect species observed within each pan was recorded and the number of each type of species recorded in each pan was counted.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591833
title: Nematopsis alignment

description: Chambouvet et al. (2016) Nematopsis temporariae (Gregarinasina, Apicomplexa, Alveolata) is an intracellular infectious agent of tadpole livers. Env. Microb. Rep.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591834
title: Stable isotope ratios of Antarctic echinoids from the PS81 - ANTXXIX/3 Polarstern expedition

description: This dataset contains carbon and nitrogen stable isotope composition of 120 Antarctic sea urchins belonging to 10 taxa (Abatus cavernosus, Amphipneustes rostratus, Amphipneustes similis, Aporocidaris eltaniana, Brachyternaster chesheri, Ctenocidaris gigantea, Notocidaris gaussiensis, Notocidaris mortenseni, Sterechinus antarcticus and Sterechinus neumayeri) and sampled in Drake Passage, Bransfield Strait and Weddell Sea during the ANTXXIX/3 (PS81) cruise of RV Polarstern in 2013. This data supports the article "Trophic Plasticity of Antarctic echinoids under contrasted environmental conditions" by L.N. Michel, B. David, P. Dubois, G. Lepoint & C. De Ridder, published in Polar Biology (doi: 10.1007/s00300-015-1873-y). Please refer to the article or contact Loïc Michel (loicmichel[at]gmail.com) for details.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591839
title: Field experiment bird data

description: The lab was finished by group of four people.we selected two different type of area---Urban and natural area at York University.If the area is 75% covered by building and pavement, then we call it Urban area. If the area is 75% covered by vegetation, then we call it Natural Area. We observed at both area on Oct 13th and Oct 20th. Method:We were using 120 metres transect and 30 metres on both side.We use binocular to observe and determiane bird species and amount within that transect. We did 8 transects of Urban and Natural Area on Oct 13th, and we finished our rest 10 transects of Urban and Natural Area on Oct 20th.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591839.v1
title: Field experiment bird data

description: The lab was finished by group of four people.we selected two different type of area---Urban and natural area at York University.If the area is 75% covered by building and pavement, then we call it Urban area. If the area is 75% covered by vegetation, then we call it Natural Area. We observed at both area on Oct 13th and Oct 20th. Method:We were using 120 metres transect and 30 metres on both side.We use binocular to observe and determiane bird species and amount within that transect. We did 8 transects of Urban and Natural Area on Oct 13th, and we finished our rest 10 transects of Urban and Natural Area on Oct 20th.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591845.v3
title: Bees Attraction to Flower Colour

description: The experiment was conducted over a 2 day span by ecology students at York University. The first day the data was collected was on Wednesday October 14th, 2015 for 1.5 hours at approximately 2:45-4:15pm. The temperature was 10 degrees celcius and cloudy with limited sun exposure. The second day the data was collected the following week on Wednesday October 21, 2015 for the same duration (1.5 hrs) at approximately 2:50-4:20pm. The temperature was 9 degrees celcius and cloudy and slightly windy with no sun. The experiment took place in the grassland along Pond road of York University Campus. The grassland was divided into three areas: the edge, the midde and the pond. The edge represented the area towards the mowed grass. The pond represented the area closer towards the pond. The middle represented the area between the edge and the pond. On day one, 4 red pans, 4 yellow pans and 4 white pans were randomly distributed in the edge of the grassland. 4 red pans, 4 yellow pans and 4 white pans were randomly distributed in the middle of the grassland. 4 red pans, 4 yellow pans and 4 white pans were randomly distributed close to the pond of the grassland. Each pan were at least 1 meter apart from each other within each grassland. The different insect species observed within each pan was recorded and the number of each type of species recorded in each pan was counted. The same procedure was repeated for day two. A total of 72 pans were used in the entire experiment. There were equal number of pans of each colour (24 red, 24 yellow and 24 white) and they were equallly distrubuted to each grassland location.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591833.v1
title: Nematopsis alignment

description: Chambouvet et al. (2016) Nematopsis temporariae (Gregarinasina, Apicomplexa, Alveolata) is an intracellular infectious agent of tadpole livers. Env. Microb. Rep.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591816
title: Pan Trap Dataset: Pond/Grassland

description: In this investigation, the field experiment consisted of a group, consisting of five members, which setup pan traps for two trials, over the course of two separate days. One trial was done per week for two weeks at the York University Keele campus pond/grassland area. The experiment location was primarily non-mowed grassland with a small patch of mowed grassland between 20 and 25 meters from the pond. The temperature for trial 1 and 2 were 13 and 10 degrees Celsius respectively, with both days demonstrating cloudy weather with very little sunshine. The equipment used for this experiment included 36 pan traps, 12 of each color including white, yellow, and blue, two transect tapes, and soapy water. The members of the group travelled to the east side of the pond and marked the edge of the pond as 0 meters. A transect of 25 meters were measured east of the starting location towards the University campus. A set of traps were placed starting at 0 meters and subsequent traps were set every 5 meters from the starting position. The traps were divided into two of each color per transect, with a total of six traps per location. A second lateral transect of 5 meters were measured that bisected the original transect at each trap location. The six traps were randomly chosen and placed along the 5 meters lateral transect 1 meter apart from each other. There were a total of six transect trap locations with six traps each at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 meters from the pond. The total number of different plant species were counted along each 5 meters lateral transect, the species was not identified it was only acknowledged that they were different species present. The traps were then left to stand for one hour and thirty minutes after which the group counted the insects that were captured starting from the earliest traps set. The same process was repeated once again one week later for the second trial. Although this experiment was focused on insects, all invertebrates that were captured by the traps were also included in the data. Possible sources for error in this investigation included not setting up the pan traps at appropriate distances, and not setting the traps in random order, which could result in obscured data results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591818
title: Ecology Lab 4 - Quadrate Data Set - Insect Abundance in Different Plant Surroundings

description: Three different areas of vegetation was studied for their abundance of insects based on the height of surrounding plants. Tall Grass area of plants over 15 inches tall; Short Grass area of plants under 5 inches tall; and concrete parking lot area of no vegetation. 40 quadrates were randomly placed for each of the three different vegetation areas. For each quadrate placed average height of plants were recorded using transect, and total abundance of observed insects were recorded. Location of these three areas were located at the York University Keele Campus. South-East of the pond located on Pond Road. Experiment was completed on a cool dry day.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591840.v1
title: Supplementary Material SM01 for Covariance Perturbation Theory for Time Series Analysis of Cell Membrane Permeability in Rumen Microbes at Dual-Time Scales

description: This file is the entire dataset for developing Covariance Perturbation Theory for Time Series Analysis of Cell Membrane Permeability in Rumen Microbes at Dual-Time Scales.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591845.v2
title: Bees Attraction to Flower Colour

description: The experiment was conducted over a 2 day span by ecology students at York University. The first day the data was collected was on Wednesday October 14th, 2015 for 1.5 hours at approximately 2:45-4:15pm. The temperature was 10 degrees celcius and cloudy with limited sun exposure. The second day the data was collected the following week on Wednesday October 21, 2015 for the same duration (1.5 hrs) at approximately 2:50-4:20pm. The temperature was 9 degrees celcius and cloudy and slightly windy with no sun. The experiment took place in the grassland along Pond road of York University Campus. The grassland was divided into three areas: the edge, the midde and the pond. The edge represented the area towards the mowed grass. The pond represented the area closer towards the pond. The middle represented the area between the edge and the pond. 72 pans were used in the entire experiment. There were equal number of pans of each colour (24 red, 24 yellow and 24 white) and they were equallly distrubuted to each grassland location. 8 red pans, 8 yellow pans and 8 white pans were randomly distributed in the edge of the grassland. 8 red pans, 8 yellow pans and 8 white pans were randomly distributed in the middle of the grassland. 8 red pans, 8 yellow pans and 8 white pans were randomly distributed close to the pond of the grassland. Each pan were at least 1 meter apart from each other within each grassland. The different insect species observed within each pan was recorded and the number of each type of species recorded in each pan was counted.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591801
title: Data for manuscript entitled "Context-dependent diversity-effects of seaweed consumption on coral reefs in Kenya"

description: Data for manuscript entitled "Context-dependent diversity-effects of seaweed consumption on coral reefs in Kenya" submitted to PLOS ONE.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591834.v1
title: Trophic plasticity of Antarctic echinoids under contrasted environmental conditions

description: Data supporting the article "Trophic Plasticity of Antarctic echinoids under contrasted environmental conditions" by L.N. Michel, B. David, P. Dubois, G. Lepoint & C. De Ridder, currently under review. See article for details.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591816.v1
title: Pan Trap Dataset: Pond/Grassland

description: In this investigation, the field experiment consisted of a group, consisting of five members, which setup pan traps for two trials, over the course of two separate days. One trial was done per week for two weeks at the York University Keele campus pond/grassland area. The experiment location was primarily non-mowed grassland with a small patch of mowed grassland between 20 and 25 meters from the pond. The temperature for trial 1 and 2 were 13 and 10 degrees Celsius respectively, with both days demonstrating cloudy weather with very little sunshine. The equipment used for this experiment included 36 pan traps, 12 of each color including white, yellow, and blue, two transect tapes, and soapy water. The members of the group travelled to the east side of the pond and marked the edge of the pond as 0 meters. A transect of 25 meters were measured east of the starting location towards the University campus. A set of traps were placed starting at 0 meters and subsequent traps were set every 5 meters from the starting position. The traps were divided into two of each color per transect, with a total of six traps per location. A second lateral transect of 5 meters were measured that bisected the original transect at each trap location. The six traps were randomly chosen and placed along the 5 meters lateral transect 1 meter apart from each other. There were a total of six transect trap locations with six traps each at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 meters from the pond. The total number of different plant species were counted along each 5 meters lateral transect, the species was not identified it was only acknowledged that they were different species present. The traps were then left to stand for one hour and thirty minutes after which the group counted the insects that were captured starting from the earliest traps set. The same process was repeated once again one week later for the second trial. Although this experiment was focused on insects, all invertebrates that were captured by the traps were also included in the data. Possible sources for error in this investigation included not setting up the pan traps at appropriate distances, and not setting the traps in random order, which could result in obscured data results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1591834.v2
title: Trophic plasticity of Antarctic echinoids under contrasted environmental conditions

description: Data supporting the article "Trophic Plasticity of Antarctic echinoids under contrasted environmental conditions" by L.N. Michel, B. David, P. Dubois, G. Lepoint & C. De Ridder, currently under review. See article for details.