DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18361354
title: Isomorphic Restoration A Public-Interest Framework for Restoring System Alignment in an Era of Planetary Constraint

description: Isomorphic Restoration

A Public-Interest Framework for Restoring System Alignment in an Era of Planetary Constraint

Author: Mark Anthony BrewerDate: January 2026Status: Public White Paper · Systems Analysis · Simulation-InformedAudience: Policymakers, systems engineers, economists, climate scientists, governance researchers

 



 

Executive Summary

Human civilization is encountering a class of failures that cannot be resolved through incremental reform, persuasion, or ideological consensus. These failures—manifesting across economic stability, ecological integrity, and shared epistemic reality—share a common root: loss of structural alignment between governing abstractions and the physical systems they are meant to regulate.

This paper introduces Isomorphic Restoration, a systems-engineering framework for diagnosing and correcting that misalignment. The framework is not a political program, a call for emergency powers, or a prescriptive blueprint. It is a viability-oriented analytical model that asks a prior question to policy:

What constraints must be enforced for a system to remain operational over time?

Isomorphic Restoration reframes governance as alignment maintenance rather than preference arbitration. It proposes that many current failures persist not because of insufficient will or technology, but because existing institutions operate outside their viable state space, relying on reserve depletion and narrative substitution instead of corrective feedback.

The framework draws from viability theory, cybernetics, biophysical economics, and information theory to outline how systems exit viability—and how constraint-first architectures can restore it.

 



 

1. The Core Diagnosis: Structural Drift

1.1 Drift Defined

A system experiences structural drift when its internal representations (prices, metrics, narratives, incentives) no longer correspond to the constraints of the environment it operates within. Feedback loops that once corrected deviation instead amplify it.

Drift is not collapse.Drift is continued operation without correction.

This distinction matters because systems can remain productive, profitable, and politically stable while moving steadily toward failure. Drift is therefore difficult to detect using short-term indicators.

1.2 Three Interlocked Domains of Drift

Isomorphic Restoration identifies three coupled domains:





Economic DriftFinancial abstractions expand faster than physical throughput, allowing claims, leverage, and valuation to exceed settlement capacity. Price signals degrade, risk is externalized, and liquidity substitutes for solvency.




Ecological DriftLinear industrial processes operate within a cyclic biosphere. Outputs are not reintegrated as inputs, generating entropy debt that accumulates beyond ecological buffering capacity.




Epistemic DriftInformation systems optimize for engagement rather than verification. Shared reality fragments, weakening coordination and disabling corrective governance.



These domains reinforce one another. Economic abstraction accelerates ecological depletion; ecological stress amplifies social instability; epistemic fragmentation prevents coordinated response.

 



 

2. Viability Theory: Why Incremental Reform Fails

2.1 Viability vs Optimization

Viability theory distinguishes between optimizing a system and keeping it within a survivable state space. A system may operate efficiently yet still be non-viable.

Incremental reform assumes the system remains within its viability kernel. Isomorphic Restoration argues that many contemporary systems have already exited that region and are surviving by consuming reserves—financial, ecological, institutional, or social.

Once outside the viability kernel:





small corrections are absorbed rather than corrective,




reforms reduce symptoms but not trajectory,




and collapse becomes a function of time rather than choice.



2.2 Reserve Consumption as False Stability

Reserve consumption creates the illusion of resilience:





debt defers economic reckoning,




ecological sinks absorb waste temporarily,




narrative coherence masks epistemic decay.



But reserves are finite. When they deplete, failure accelerates.

 



 

3. Isomorphic Closure: The Central Design Principle

3.1 What Is Isomorphism?

In this framework, isomorphism means structural correspondence. A governing system must share the same constraints, dimensionality, and limits as the system it governs.

When representations exceed reality—financial, ecological, or informational—governance becomes symbolic rather than operational.

Isomorphic Restoration proposes closure: the elimination of open loops where abstractions drift independently of physical constraint.

 



 

4. Economic Isomorphic Restoration

Economic systems coordinate behavior through price, risk, and reward. When these signals lose fidelity, markets misallocate resources even while appearing active.

Isomorphic economic restoration requires:





price signals that reflect real energy and material costs,




bounded leverage tied to settlement capacity,




elimination of profit derived solely from opacity or systemic risk amplification.



This is not an argument against markets or capital. It is an argument for signal integrity. Markets cannot coordinate if their signals are detached from reality.

 



 

5. Ecological Isomorphic Restoration

The biosphere operates as a closed metabolic system. Industrial civilization does not.

Restoration requires aligning production with:





material cycling,




regenerative throughput,




and bounded waste.



This is not an ethical demand. It is a thermodynamic requirement. Systems that violate material closure accumulate entropy until they fail.

 



 

6. Epistemic Isomorphic Restoration

Governance requires a shared factual substrate. When information systems reward virality over accuracy, coordination collapses even in technologically advanced societies.

Epistemic restoration requires:





privileging verifiable signals over engagement metrics,




auditability of decision-critical data,




and weighting information by reliability rather than popularity.



This is not speech restriction. It is infrastructure integrity—the informational equivalent of safe drinking water.

 



 

7. Constraint-First Governance

7.1 Policy-First vs Constraint-First

Traditional governance is policy-first: propose actions, debate values, react to outcomes.

Constraint-first governance reverses the order:





identify non-negotiable physical and systemic limits,




encode them as invariants,




evaluate policies against those invariants before implementation.



Policies that violate viability constraints are rejected not because they are unpopular, but because they are non-operational.

7.2 Constraints Are Not Authority

Constraints already govern all functional systems:





gravity governs structures,




thermodynamics governs engines,




biology governs medicine.



Isomorphic Restoration makes these constraints explicit rather than implicit. Authority derives from measurable reality, not institutional power.

 



 

8. Safeguards and Misuse Prevention

The framework explicitly anticipates misuse, including authoritarian capture. Safeguards include:





constraints defined by verifiable data, not leaders,




open and auditable models,




no unilateral override authority,




simulation and verification prior to real-world application.



Isomorphic Restoration is a diagnostic and design framework, not a mandate.

 



 

9. What This Framework Is Not





It is not a call for emergency rule.




It is not a political ideology.




It is not an implementation plan.




It is not a replacement for democratic process.



It is a lens for understanding when systems have exited viability—and what kinds of corrections are even mathematically possible.

 



 

Conclusion: Viability as the Primary Metric

Freedom, growth, and innovation are only meaningful within a viable system. When governance abstractions drift beyond physical and epistemic constraints, freedom becomes temporary and growth becomes extractive.

Isomorphic Restoration proposes a shift in priority:from maximizing outcomesto preserving viability.

This paper offers a way to think about that preservation before irreversible thresholds are crossed.