cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4206924.v3
title: Extensive theoretical/numerical comparative studies on <i>H</i> <sub>2</sub> and generalised <i>H</i> <sub>2</sub> norms in sampled-data systems

description: This paper is concerned with linear time-invariant (LTI) sampled-data systems (by which we mean sampled-data systems with LTI generalised plants and LTI controllers) and studies their <i>H</i> <sub>2</sub> norms from the viewpoint of impulse responses and generalised <i>H</i> <sub>2</sub> norms from the viewpoint of the induced norms from <i>L</i> <sub>2</sub> to <i>L</i> <sub>∞</sub>. A new definition of the <i>H</i> <sub>2</sub> norm of LTI sampled-data systems is first introduced through a sort of intermediate standpoint of those for the existing two definitions. We then establish unified treatment of the three definitions of the <i>H</i> <sub>2</sub> norm through a matrix function <i>G</i>(τ) defined on the sampling interval [0, <i>h</i>). This paper next considers the generalised <i>H</i> <sub>2</sub> norms, in which two types of the <i>L</i> <sub>∞</sub> norm of the output are considered as the temporal supremum magnitude under the spatial 2-norm and ∞-norm of a vector-valued function. We further give unified treatment of the generalised <i>H</i> <sub>2</sub> norms through another matrix function <i>F</i>(θ) which is also defined on [0, <i>h</i>). Through a close connection between <i>G</i>(τ) and <i>F</i>(θ), some theoretical relationships between the <i>H</i> <sub>2</sub> and generalised <i>H</i> <sub>2</sub> norms are provided. Furthermore, appropriate extensions associated with the treatment of <i>G</i>(τ) and <i>F</i>(θ) to the closed interval [0, <i>h</i>] are discussed to facilitate numerical computations and comparisons of the <i>H</i> <sub>2</sub> and generalised <i>H</i> <sub>2</sub> norms. Through theoretical and numerical studies, it is shown that the two generalised <i>H</i> <sub>2</sub> norms coincide with neither of the three <i>H</i> <sub>2</sub> norms of LTI sampled-data systems even though all the five definitions coincide with each other when single-output continuous-time LTI systems are considered as a special class of LTI sampled-data systems. To summarise, this paper clarifies that the five control performance measures are mutually related with each other but they are also intrinsically different from each other.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/zcqcvl
title: cbb20151001_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4210863.v142
title: Modality switches occur early and extend late in conceptual processing: Evidence from ERPs (Bernabeu, Willems, & Louwerse, in prep.)

description: Files: poster, design overview, stimuli, EEG montage used, waveforms, window 1 close-ups, subtraction topographies, critical results, fixed effects of final models, entire modeling, raw data. For best resolution, download image(s). <b>Plot waveforms within any sections of the data here</b>, and <b>access all data and code here</b>.<b>Abstract </b>This experiment investigates the relevance of perceptual simulation in conceptual processing by revisiting the Conceptual Modality Switch paradigm. In each trial, participants (46) verified the relation between a property word and a concept word. These linguistic stimuli were modality-normed, and covertly created switches in conceptual modality across some trials—specifically, auditory-to-visual and haptic-to-visual switches. These two conditions were compared to the visual-to-visual (no-switch) condition. ERPs were time-locked to the first word in target trials so as to reduce within-trial confounds and to measure the manipulation on-line. A widespread effect was found, characterized by more negative ERP amplitudes for modality-switching than not switching. It proved significant in four typical time windows from 160 to 750 ms post word onset, showing greater strength in Posterior brain regions and after 350 ms. The results suggest that perceptual simulation may contribute to conceptual processing, but also that the early lexicosemantic stage is relatively amodal.<b></b><b></b><b></b><b></b><b></b><b></b>ReferencesCollins, J., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Coulson, S. (2011). Modality switching in a property verification task: an ERP study of what happens when candles flicker after high heels click. <i>Frontiers in Psychology, 2.</i>Hald, L. A., Marshall, J.-A., Janssen, D. P., & Garnham, A. (2011). Switching modalities in a sentence verification task: ERP evidence for embodied language processing. <i>Frontiers in Psychology, 2.</i> Hauk, O. (2016). Only time will tell—Why temporal information is essential for our neuroscientific understanding of semantics. <i>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23</i>.<i></i>Louwerse, M., & Connell, L. (2011). A taste of words: linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. <i>Cognitive Science, 35, </i>2, 381-98.Mahon, B.Z., & Hickok, G. (2016). Arguments about the nature of concepts: Symbols, embodiment, and beyond. <em>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, </em>941-958.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/ze4ln4
title: cbb20151210_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/oh97eb
title: cbb20150504_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4210863.v143
title: Modality switches occur early and extend late in conceptual processing: Evidence from ERPs (Bernabeu, Willems, & Louwerse, in prep.)

description: Files: poster, design overview, stimuli, EEG montage used, waveforms, window 1 close-ups, subtraction topographies, critical results, fixed effects of final models, entire modeling, raw data. For best resolution, download image(s). <b>Plot waveforms within any sections of the data here</b>, and <b>access all data and code here</b>.<b>Abstract </b>We tested the relevance of modality-specific information for conceptual processing by tracking the Conceptual Modality Switch effect over time. Forty-six participants verified the relation between property words and concept words. The conceptual modalities of consecutive trials were controlled in order to produce: an Auditory-to-visual switch, a Haptic-to-visual switch, and a Visual-to-visual no-switch. Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) were time-locked to the onset of the first word in the target trials so as to measure the effect online and to avoid a task-related confound. A switch effect was found, characterized by more negative ERP amplitudes for modality switches than no-switches. It proved significant in four typical time windows from 160 to 750 milliseconds post word onset, with greater strength in posterior brain regions, and after 350 milliseconds. These results suggest that modality-specific information may be part of conceptual processing in certain tasks, but also that the early stage of processing is relatively amodal.<b></b><b></b><b></b><b></b><b></b><b></b>ReferencesCollins, J., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Coulson, S. (2011). Modality switching in a property verification task: an ERP study of what happens when candles flicker after high heels click. <i>Frontiers in Psychology, 2.</i>Hald, L. A., Marshall, J.-A., Janssen, D. P., & Garnham, A. (2011). Switching modalities in a sentence verification task: ERP evidence for embodied language processing. <i>Frontiers in Psychology, 2.</i> Hauk, O. (2016). Only time will tell—Why temporal information is essential for our neuroscientific understanding of semantics. <i>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23</i>.<i></i>Louwerse, M., & Connell, L. (2011). A taste of words: linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. <i>Cognitive Science, 35, </i>2, 381-98.Mahon, B.Z., & Hickok, G. (2016). Arguments about the nature of concepts: Symbols, embodiment, and beyond. <em>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, </em>941-958.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4206732
title: Flight past horizontal obstacles

description: 3D Coordinates of obstacles and flight kinematics<br>
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/jap0bq
title: cbb20150514_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4206732.v1
title: Flight past horizontal obstacles

description: 3D Coordinates of obstacles and flight kinematics<br>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4206723
title: An Introductory of Mental Arithmetic Using Interactive Multimedia for Pre-School Children

description: Multimedia, Gamifications, Learning, Human Computer Interaction
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/wk9xq1
title: cbb20151020_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4206723.v1
title: An Introductory of Mental Arithmetic Using Interactive Multimedia for Pre-School Children

description: Multimedia, Gamifications, Learning, Human Computer Interaction
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/wgewvi
title: cbb20150614_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/kxan1t
title: cbb20150712_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/pj0rip
title: cbb20151207_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4210863.v147
title: Modality switches occur early and extend late in conceptual processing: Evidence from ERPs (Bernabeu, Willems, & Louwerse, accepted)

description: Files: poster, design overview, stimuli, EEG montage used, waveforms, window 1 close-ups, subtraction topographies, critical results, fixed effects of final models, entire modeling, raw data. For best resolution, download image(s). <b>Plot waveforms within any sections of the data here</b>, and <b>access all data and code here</b>.<b>Abstract </b>We tested whether conceptual processing is modality-specific by tracking the time course of the Conceptual Modality Switch effect. Forty-six participants verified the relation between property words and concept words. The conceptual modality of consecutive trials was manipulated in order to produce an Auditory-to-visual switch condition, a Haptic-to-visual switch condition, and a Visual-to-visual, no-switch condition. Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) were time-locked to the onset of the first word (property) in the target trials so as to measure the effect online and to avoid a within-trial confound. A switch effect was found, characterized by more negative ERP amplitudes for modality switches than no-switches. It proved significant in four typical time windows from 160 to 750 milliseconds post word onset, with greater strength in posterior brain regions, and after 350 milliseconds. These results suggest that conceptual processing may be modality-specific in certain tasks, but also that the early stage of processing is relatively amodal.<b></b><b></b><b></b><b></b><b></b><b></b>ReferencesCollins, J., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Coulson, S. (2011). Modality switching in a property verification task: an ERP study of what happens when candles flicker after high heels click. <i>Frontiers in Psychology, 2.</i>Hald, L. A., Marshall, J.-A., Janssen, D. P., & Garnham, A. (2011). Switching modalities in a sentence verification task: ERP evidence for embodied language processing. <i>Frontiers in Psychology, 2.</i> Hauk, O. (2016). Only time will tell—Why temporal information is essential for our neuroscientific understanding of semantics. <i>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23</i>.<i></i>Louwerse, M., & Connell, L. (2011). A taste of words: linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. <i>Cognitive Science, 35, </i>2, 381-98.Mahon, B.Z., & Hickok, G. (2016). Arguments about the nature of concepts: Symbols, embodiment, and beyond. <em>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, </em>941-958.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/hyicfh
title: cbb20150817_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/msfqgw
title: cbb20151012_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4210863.v148
title: Modality switches occur early and extend late in conceptual processing: Evidence from ERPs

description: Accepted in <i>Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.</i>Files: poster, design overview, stimuli, EEG montage used, waveforms, window 1 close-ups, subtraction topographies, critical results, fixed effects of final models, entire modeling, raw data. For best resolution, download image(s). <b>Plot waveforms within any sections of the data here</b>, and <b>access all data and code here</b>.<b>Abstract </b>We tested whether conceptual processing is modality-specific by tracking the time course of the Conceptual Modality Switch effect. Forty-six participants verified the relation between property words and concept words. The conceptual modality of consecutive trials was manipulated in order to produce an Auditory-to-visual switch condition, a Haptic-to-visual switch condition, and a Visual-to-visual, no-switch condition. Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) were time-locked to the onset of the first word (property) in the target trials so as to measure the effect online and to avoid a within-trial confound. A switch effect was found, characterized by more negative ERP amplitudes for modality switches than no-switches. It proved significant in four typical time windows from 160 to 750 milliseconds post word onset, with greater strength in posterior brain regions, and after 350 milliseconds. These results suggest that conceptual processing may be modality-specific in certain tasks, but also that the early stage of processing is relatively amodal.<b></b><b></b><b></b><b></b><b></b><b></b>ReferencesCollins, J., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Coulson, S. (2011). Modality switching in a property verification task: an ERP study of what happens when candles flicker after high heels click. <i>Frontiers in Psychology, 2.</i>Hald, L. A., Marshall, J.-A., Janssen, D. P., & Garnham, A. (2011). Switching modalities in a sentence verification task: ERP evidence for embodied language processing. <i>Frontiers in Psychology, 2.</i> Hauk, O. (2016). Only time will tell—Why temporal information is essential for our neuroscientific understanding of semantics. <i>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23</i>.<i></i>Louwerse, M., & Connell, L. (2011). A taste of words: linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. <i>Cognitive Science, 35, </i>2, 381-98.Mahon, B.Z., & Hickok, G. (2016). Arguments about the nature of concepts: Symbols, embodiment, and beyond. <em>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, </em>941-958.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/rawo9s
title: cbb20151229_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/y7a5tv
title: cbb20151120_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/a0aiqu
title: cbb20150720_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/bfletq
title: cbb20151227_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/j5tjkq
title: cbb20150523_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/fpebce
title: cbb20150322_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/czyz4q
title: cbb20150708_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/glvlry
title: cbb20150402_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/frwckh
title: cbb20150513_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/4igxhs
title: cbb20151112_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/gx4acq
title: cbb20150823_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/ldiglc
title: cbb20151115_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/o5nhrz
title: cbb20150324_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/gchlzo
title: cbb20150418_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/dhlxzm
title: cbb20150515_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/tic40a
title: cbb20151102_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/ll13x2
title: cbb20151116_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/u590up
title: cbb20150811_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/aljjti
title: cbb20150828_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/uwtjox
title: cbb20150127_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/w7bdmg
title: cbb20150821_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/1iph1t
title: cbb20150422_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/dy0yyi
title: cbb20150611_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/pay27p
title: cbb20150619_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/8jociy
title: cbb20151018_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/dbdd5u
title: cbb20150426_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/6kpi1f
title: cbb20150814_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/wz9zwx
title: cbb20150218_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/lsik5o
title: cbb20150629_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/sfkg9q
title: cbb20150203_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/ggcvuk
title: cbb20150820_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/rhvnha
title: cbb20150622_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/c6fya6
title: cbb20150305_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/x4bckg
title: cbb20150829_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/9fx7pa
title: cbb20150731_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/rqcdqv
title: cbb20151205_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/cjyz8a
title: cbb20150222_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/qn8a30
title: cbb20151114_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/c5uza5
title: cbb20150806_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/3q3icu
title: cbb20150409_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/v8clgd
title: cbb20151216_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/lrwtgh
title: cbb20151221_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/ho8kh8
title: cbb20151125_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/ab6zy4
title: cbb20150131_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/2b6uah
title: cbb20150813_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/j3vxb9
title: cbb20150122_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4210863.v185
title: Modality switch effects emerge early and increase throughout conceptual processing: Evidence from ERPs

description: Conference paper in <i>Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.</i>Files: paper, poster, design overview, stimuli, EEG montage used, waveforms, window 1 close-ups, mean differences with 95% CIs, subtraction topographies, detailed waveforms, statistical results, fixed effects of final models, entire modeling, raw data. For best resolution, download file(s). Waveforms per participant and electrode (link). <b>OSF archive with all data and code (link).</b><b>Abstract </b>We tested whether conceptual processing is modality-specific by tracking the time course of the Conceptual Modality Switch effect. Forty-six participants verified the relation between property words and concept words. The conceptual modality of consecutive trials was manipulated in order to produce an Auditory-to-visual switch condition, a Haptic-to-visual switch condition, and a Visual-to-visual, no-switch condition. Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) were time-locked to the onset of the first word (property) in the target trials so as to measure the effect online and to avoid a within-trial confound. A switch effect was found, characterized by more negative ERP amplitudes for modality switches than no-switches. It proved significant in four typical time windows from 160 to 750 milliseconds post word onset, with greater strength in posterior brain regions, and after 350 milliseconds. These results suggest that conceptual processing may be modality-specific in certain tasks, but also that the early stage of processing is relatively amodal.<b></b><b></b><b></b><b></b><b></b><b></b>ReferencesCollins, J., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Coulson, S. (2011). Modality switching in a property verification task: an ERP study of what happens when candles flicker after high heels click. <i>Frontiers in Psychology, 2.</i>Hald, L. A., Marshall, J.-A., Janssen, D. P., & Garnham, A. (2011). Switching modalities in a sentence verification task: ERP evidence for embodied language processing. <i>Frontiers in Psychology, 2.</i> Hauk, O. (2016). Only time will tell—Why temporal information is essential for our neuroscientific understanding of semantics. <i>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23</i>.<i></i>Louwerse, M., & Connell, L. (2011). A taste of words: linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. <i>Cognitive Science, 35, </i>2, 381-98.Mahon, B.Z., & Hickok, G. (2016). Arguments about the nature of concepts: Symbols, embodiment, and beyond. <em>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, </em>941-958.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/qfuzlb
title: cbb20150818_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/l8dfuw
title: cbb20150215_03.txt.gz

description: :unav
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.4210863.v186
title: Modality switch effects emerge early and increase throughout conceptual processing: Evidence from ERPs

description: Conference paper in <i>Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.</i>Files: paper, poster, design overview, stimuli, EEG montage used, waveforms, window 1 close-ups, mean differences with 95% CIs, subtraction topographies, detailed waveforms, statistical results, fixed effects of final models, entire modeling, raw data. For best resolution, download file(s). Waveforms per participant and electrode (link). <b>OSF archive with all data and code (link).</b><b>Abstract </b>We tested whether conceptual processing is modality-specific by tracking the time course of the Conceptual Modality Switch effect. Forty-six participants verified the relation between property words and concept words. The conceptual modality of consecutive trials was manipulated in order to produce an Auditory-to-visual switch condition, a Haptic-to-visual switch condition, and a Visual-to-visual, no-switch condition. Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) were time-locked to the onset of the first word (property) in the target trials so as to measure the effect online and to avoid a within-trial confound. A switch effect was found, characterized by more negative ERP amplitudes for modality switches than no-switches. It proved significant in four typical time windows from 160 to 750 milliseconds post word onset, with greater strength in posterior brain regions, and after 350 milliseconds. These results suggest that conceptual processing may be modality-specific in certain tasks, but also that the early stage of processing is relatively amodal.<b></b><b></b><b></b><b></b><b></b><b></b>ReferencesCollins, J., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Coulson, S. (2011). Modality switching in a property verification task: an ERP study of what happens when candles flicker after high heels click. <i>Frontiers in Psychology, 2.</i>Hald, L. A., Marshall, J.-A., Janssen, D. P., & Garnham, A. (2011). Switching modalities in a sentence verification task: ERP evidence for embodied language processing. <i>Frontiers in Psychology, 2.</i> Hauk, O. (2016). Only time will tell—Why temporal information is essential for our neuroscientific understanding of semantics. <i>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23</i>.<i></i>Louwerse, M., & Connell, L. (2011). A taste of words: linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. <i>Cognitive Science, 35, </i>2, 381-98.Mahon, B.Z., & Hickok, G. (2016). Arguments about the nature of concepts: Symbols, embodiment, and beyond. <em>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, </em>941-958.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/v1rjpf/okwked
title: cbb20150420_03.txt.gz

description: :unav