DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10034904
title: NOAA NCCOS Assessment: Agency priorities for mapping coral reef ecosystems in American Samoa, 2023-06-06 to 2023-08-07

description: Description:
NOAA's Coral Reef Conservation Program (CRCP) has identified a need for priority locations based on emerging management requirements in shallow coral reef areas (up to 40 meters depth) surrounding American Samoa. The priorities provided by participating agencies will inform research and monitoring activities, address current and future management needs, and maximize opportunities to leverage and complement existing regional efforts.
To meet this need, NOAA's National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (NCCOS) developed a systematic, quantitative approach and online GIS application to gather seafloor mapping priorities from researchers and coral reef managers. Participants placed virtual coins into a grid overlaid on the project area to express the location of their mapping priorities. They also used pull-down menus to indicate specific mapping data needs and the rationale for their selections. Participants' inputs were compiled and analyzed to identify high priority areas along with their justifications and requirements. A total of nine participant groups entered their mapping priorities into the online tool. Identifying these high priority areas provide a critical spatial framework for prioritizing mapping efforts in shallow coral reef ecosystems in American Samoa.
Purpose:
The overall goal of the project was to systematically gather and quantify suggestions for mapping needs to support management of shallow coral reef ecosystems along the coast of the American Samoa. This dataset supports these goals by compiling input from a diversity of regional experts on their recommended priorities for mapping data collection.
Methods:
An advisory group was established which included individuals from NOAA CRCP and NOAA Fisheries. This advisory team customized the prioritization process specifically to meet the needs of CRCP and local coral reef manager priorities. In the online prioritization tool the study area was divided into 160 hexagonal grid cells 2.6 km2 in size. Existing relevant spatial datasets (e.g., bathymetry layers, Sanctuary Protection Areas, etc.) were provided as a digital atlas to help participants understand information and data gaps within the project area and to identify locations they wanted to prioritize for future data collections. Each participant was provided with 50 virtual coins to place into grid cells that they wished to prioritize. They were instructed to place more coins in grid cells that were higher priorities. A maximum of 5 coins could be placed into an individual grid cell. Respondents also reported why these locations were important by selecting a minimum of one, and a maximum of two, management uses from the following list: endangered species management (e.g.,), habitat restoration, monitoring, coastal vulnerability planning, watershed management, fisheries management, consultations and permitting, emergency response, and spatial protection and management. Respondents also reported requirements of data were needed in priority cells. A minimum of one, to a maximum of two choices were selected from the following list: delineations of large topographic features, delineations of hard vs. soft bottom, models of habitat suitability for key taxa or communities, delineations of substrate type (e.g. sand, mud, coral, rock), models of presence/absence or density of corals, identification of coral species and their local environments, documentation of individual specimen condition. Coin values were summarized and mapped to identify high priority areas, reasons for those priorities, and information needs. This ESRI shapefile contains the 2.6 km2 grid cells used in this prioritization and their associated coin values overall, as well as by management use, data product, and mapping methodology. Other summary values include the number of participants, number of participating groups, number of management uses, and number of data requirements. Additionally, coins for microscale (identification of coral species and their local environments and documentation of individual specimen condition), mesoscale (delineations of substrate type, models of presence/absence/density of corals), and regional (delineations of topographic features, delineations of hard vs. soft bottom, models of habitat suitability) requirements were summarized. Also included is a ranking of each grid cell based on the total number of coins, management uses, and participating groups allocating coins in the respective cell. For a complete description of the process and analysis see: Hile et al. 2023, in prep.
description: Dataset Authors:



Hile, Sarah; Kraus, Jennifer; Buckel, Christine; Williams, Bethany; Howell, Jacob; Pagan, Francisco; Towle, Erica


Principal Investigator:



Jennifer Kraus, jennifer.kraus@noaa.gov , US DOC; NOAA; NOS; National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (NCCOS)


Additional Principal Investigators:



Tim Battista, tim.battista@noaa.gov, US DOC; NOAA; NOS; National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (NCCOS)


Primary Point of Contact:



Jennifer Kraus, jennifer.kraus@noaa.gov , US DOC; NOAA; NOS; National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (NCCOS)

NCCOS Data Manager, nccos.data@noaa.gov, US DOC; NOAA; NOS; National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (NCCOS)
description: File Information:
Total File Size: 12.9 KB total (zipped), 71.9 KB (unzipped)
Data Files:

CRCP_GapAnalysis_Priorities_AS.dbf
CRCP_GapAnalysis_Priorities_AS.prj
CRCP_GapAnalysis_Priorities_AS.shp
CRCP_GapAnalysis_Priorities_AS.shx