DOI: 10.5061/dryad.xksn02vj9
title: Dataset of forb composition in a Pacific Northwest Bunchgrass Prairie

description: This dataset supports the research article "Forb composition
 gradients and intra-annual variation in a threatened Pacific Northwest
 Bunchgrass Prairie; Averett and Endress. In Print.  Ecology and
 Evolution".  This data includes: (1) perennial forb species
 composition data from Pacific Northwest Bunchgrass Pairie habitat in the
 Starkey Experimental Forest and Range, northeastern Oregon; (2)
 environmental, abiotic, and species trait variables measured from each
 sampling site; (3) plant species list; (4) densities of culturally
 important forb species; and (5) long-term sample dates for vegetation
 plots from the Starkey Experimental Forest and surrounding National Forest
 lands.  Forb composition data was collected from 29 plots in the
 Starkey Experimental Forest and Range, northeastern Oregon, at three
 different times during 2016 (April; May; July).
description: We used a stratified random design to sample vegetation
 composition from 29 (154 m<sup>2</sup>) plots in Pacific
 Northwest Bunchgrass (PNB) habitat within the SEFR.  Areas within the Main
 and Campbell study areas of the Starkey Experimental Forest and Range were
 stratified by percent tree cover, then 30 plots were randomly located
 within areas with &lt; 5% tree cover (grassland plots).  One plot was
 located within an open forest when visited, and therefore, excluded,
 resulting in a total of 29 plots.  We sampled each plot at three different
 times during the growing season in 2016: April (April 18th – May 2nd); May
 (May 23rd – June 1st); and July (July 11th – 18th).  The first two sample
 periods coincided with growth of spring ephemerals.  The third was within
 the traditional vegetation sampling window for PNB. One
 circular plot (radius = 7m) was established at each sampling site and 12
 quadrats (1m<sup>2</sup>) were systematically located within
 each plot (Appendix A; Fig A1).  Two transect lines were laid out
 perpendicular to each other and intersecting at the center of the plot,
 resulting in one line running 14 m in length from north (0 m) to south (14
 m), and the other 14 m in length from west (0 m) to east (14 m).  Four
 quadrats were centered at 0.5 m, 4 m, 10 m, and 13.5 m along each of the
 two transects for a total of eight quadrats along the north/south and
 west/east lines.  Four additional quadrats were located 4 m from the plot
 center along each of the NE, SE, SW, and NW cardinal directions for a
 total of 12 quadrats per plot.  Within each quadrat,
 presence/absence was recorded and canopy cover was estimated for all forb
 species during the early (April and May) sampling periods, and all
 vascular plant species during the late (July) sampling period.  Canopy
 cover was classified into one of eight cover categories (&lt;1%;
 &gt;1-5%; &gt;5-25%; &gt;25-50%; &gt;50-75%;
 &gt;75-95%; &gt;95-99%; &gt;99-100%).  Plot level abundance
 for each species was calculated as the frequency of quadrats occupied per
 plot. Plot-level cover was calculated as the average arithmetic midpoint
 of the cover classes.  Graminoids (grasses, sedges, and rushes) were not
 identified to species during April and May due to their early phenological
 development. Plot-level cover of the soil surface, i.e., litter, rock,
 biotic crust (moss or lichen), and bare ground along with cover of total
 vegetation and each functional group (i.e., perennial forbs, annual forbs,
 perennial graminoids, annual graminoids, and shrubs) were estimated the
 same as species cover. A tile probe was used to measure
 depth to soil restrictive layer (average of nine samples per plot) within
 80 cm of the mineral soil surface during April at the center of the plot
 and at 1.75 m and 12.25 m along the North/South and West/East lines as
 well as at 6.5 m from the plot center along each of the NE, SE, SW, and NW
 lines.  Nine soil cores (&lt; 25 cm deep depending on soil depth) were
 collected offset (0.25 m towards the plot center) from the tile probe
 measurement locations.  The nine soil cores were then mixed for each plot,
 ground, and dried at 60 ˚C for 48 hours.  Soil chemical and textural
 analyses were performed at AgSource Laboratory (Umatilla, OR, USA) for pH,
 cation exchange capacity (CEC), organic matter (%), Phosphorous (P;
 Olsen); Potassium (K; Ammonium Acetate), Magnesium (Mg; Ammonium Acetate),
 Calcium (Ca; Ammonium Acetate), Sodium (Na; Ammonium Acetate), and percent
 Sand, Silt, and Clay.  Elevation, slope, and aspect
 were extracted from 30-m resolution digital elevation models (U.S.
 Geological Survey 2006) using ArcGIS 9.1.  We transformed aspect by
 folding the aspect about the NE – SW lines to align with an expected heat
 load gradient (SW = maximum heat load and NE = minimum heat
 load).  For more detail regarding methods please refer
 to Averett and Endress. In Print. Ecology and Evolution "Forb
 composition gradients and intra-annual variation in a threatened Pacific
 Northwest Bunchgrass Prairie".
description: The following text describes the data included within the
 uploaded data file: File S1: 
 SpeciesMatrix.xlsx Worksheet 1 – “SpeciesList” contains
 120 rows by 4 columns.  Column 1, Spp. Code is the USDA PlantDatabase
 (https://plant.sc.egov.usda.gov/java/) species symbol; Column 2, Spp.
 Name, is the species name; Column 3, Life Form, contains species life
 forms, i.e., AF = Annual forb, AG = Annual grass, PF = Perennial forb, PG
 = Perennial graminoid (grass, rush, sedge); Column 4, Nativity, indicates
 whether the species is native or non-native to the contiguous United
 States of America (https://plant.sc.egov.usda.gov/java/). Worksheet 2 – “SpeciesMatrix” contains NPF abundances for the three sample periods (April, May, July 2016) and perennial bunchgrass and non-native annual grass abundances in July 2016.  Rows are sample units, columns are species, and each cell contains abundance (percentage of quadrats, out of 12 total, occupied by that species in that sample unit) values.  Worksheet 3 – “EnvironmentalMatrix” contains (30 rows by 26 columns) environmental and biotic variables by sample unit.  “Plot” = sample unit, SlopePer = Percent slope, AspFolNW = Aspect folded about the NE-SW line, AVG_Dept(cm) = average soil depth to restrictive layer in cm, P = soil Phosphorous concentration, K = soil Potassium concentration, Mg = soil Magnesium concentration, Clay = Percent clay in the soil, Bcrust(%) = average plot-level percent cover of biotic crust, Bground (%) = average plot-level cover of bare ground, Rock (%) = average plot-level cover of rock, Total.Veg = average cover of total vegetation cover, Geophyte = relative abundance of geophytes compared to all native perennial forb abundance, Taproot = relative abundance of tap-rooted perennial forbs, Rhizomatous = relative abundance of rhizomatous perennial forbs, Fibrous = relative abundance of fibrous rooted forbs, Veg_Group = vegetation group identified using Cluster Analysis, NPFCoverApril = average plot-level native perennial forb cover in April, NPFCoverMay = average plot-level native perennial forb cover in May,  NPFCoverJuly = average plot-level native perennial forb cover in July, NPFRich_April = average plot-level native perennial forb richness in April, NPFRich_May = average plot-level native perennial forb richness in May,  NPFRich_July = average plot-level native perennial forb richness in July.  Flowers_April; _May; _July contains average plot-level native perennial forb flower counts for April, May, and July respectively. Worksheet 4 – “FirstFoodDensity” contains 296 rows (quadrats) by 6 columns.  Columns include Plot ID, quadrat ID (quadrats not included did not contain the species of interest in any of the three sampling periods), species (<em>Camas quamash </em>and <em>Lomatium cous</em>), plant densities during April, May, and July respectively. Worksheet 5 – “VegSamplingDates” contains 2575 rows by 3 columns.  Columns are sampling dates (month and day of the year), plot type (EcoPlot – sampling dates contained in the Northeast Oregon Ecology Program database dates range from May 11, 1976 to June 21, 2016; Starkey – vegetation sampling dates from Starkey Experimental Forest and Range, dates range from June 5, 1952 to October 24, 2005), and elevation (EcoPlot dates give elevation, Starkey dates have no exact elevation recorded but are located between 1120-1500 m).