cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15153734
title: Table 6 in Investigation of Ichthyophthirius multifiliis infection in fish from natural water bodies in the Lhasa and Nagqu regions of Tibet

description: Table 6 Pairwise comparisons of locality.
Sample 1-Sam-TestStandardStandrad TestSignificantple 2StatisticErrorStatisticCW-BZ*15.3337.0332.1800.029LW-BZ*15.3336.3402.4190.016CW-CEL9.5008.0581.1790.238LW-CEL9.5007.4601.2730.203CW-CNL*16.2506.4602.5150.012LW-CNL*16.2505.6982.8520.004CW-LW0.0005.2750.0001.000CW-LR3.8005.2750.7200.471CW-ZZ9.0006.0911.4780.140CW-SL*16.5008.0582.0480.041LW-LR3.8004.3070.8820.378LW-ZZ9.0005.2751.7060.088LW-SL*16.5007.4602.2120.027LR-ZZ5.2005.2750.9860.324LR-CEL5.7007.4600.7640.445LR-BZ11.5336.3401.8190.069LR-CNL*12.4505.6982.1850.029LR-SL12.7007.4601.7020.089ZZ-CEL0.5008.0580.0620.951ZZ-BZ6.3337.0330.9000.368ZZ-CNL7.2506.4601.1220.262ZZ-SL7.5008.0580.9310.352CEL-BZ5.8338.7920.6640.507CEL-CNL6.7508.3400.8090.418CEL-SL7.0009.6310.7270.467BZ-CNL0.9177.3560.1250.901BZ-SL1.1678.7920.1330.894CNL-SL0.2508.3400.0300.976
description: Published as part of Qin, Tian, Hu, Guangran, Cheng, Jiangwen, Chen, Fanglin, Fu, Peipei, Zhao, Weishan, Bu, Xialian, Cheng, Houda, Zou, Hong, Li, Wenxiang, Wu, Shangong, Wang, Guitang & Li, Ming, 2024, International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 23 on page 100894, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2023.100894, http://zenodo.org/record/10933796
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15153725
title: Table 1 in Relationship between fish length and otolith dimensions of Yellow striped goatfish, Upeneus vittatus (Forsskal, 1775) along the Indian coast

description: Table 1 — Fish length and otolith dimensions measurement of U. vittatus from the Indian coast Sampling Station Sampling location N Measurement Min Max Mean S. D SE
Mumbai18°54’ N, 72°49’ E80Total length (cm)10.9521.4415.621.910.21Otolith length (cm)0.3140.59620.3990.03780.004Otolith width (cm)0.1120.3980.2510.0370.004Otolith weight (g)0.00290.00890.00580.00120.00013Kakinada16°57’ N, 82°15’ E90Total length (cm)11.6717.5213.921.070.11Otolith length (cm)0.3340.4870.3940.0250.0026Otolith width (cm)0.2120.3040.2480.0140.0015Otolith weight (g)0.00310.00790.00550.000880.000094Puri19°81’ N, 85°83’ E67Total length (cm)11.8716.5914.000.980.12Otolith length (cm)0.3270.4090.3590.01920.0023Otolith width (cm)0.2080.2720.2350.0150.0019Otolith weight (g)0.0020.00990.00450.00100.00013Total237
description: Published as part of Nama, S, Bhushan, S, Jaiswar, A K, Ramteke, K & Pathak, V, 2022, Relationship between fish length and otolith dimensions of Yellow striped goatfish, Upeneus vittatus (Forsskal, 1775) along the Indian coast, pp. 762 in Indian Journal of Geo Marine Sciences 51 (9) on page 762, DOI: 10.56042/ijms.v51i09.2332, http://zenodo.org/record/11622251
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15153736
title: Table 5 in Investigation of Ichthyophthirius multifiliis infection in fish from natural water bodies in the Lhasa and Nagqu regions of Tibet

description: Table 5 Normality test of Prevalence and Salinity.
StatisticdfsignificancePrevalence0.92360.528Salinity0.83360.114
description: Published as part of Qin, Tian, Hu, Guangran, Cheng, Jiangwen, Chen, Fanglin, Fu, Peipei, Zhao, Weishan, Bu, Xialian, Cheng, Houda, Zou, Hong, Li, Wenxiang, Wu, Shangong, Wang, Guitang & Li, Ming, 2024, International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 23 on page 100894, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2023.100894, http://zenodo.org/record/10933796
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15153737
title: Table 5 in Investigation of Ichthyophthirius multifiliis infection in fish from natural water bodies in the Lhasa and Nagqu regions of Tibet

description: Table 5 Normality test of Prevalence and Salinity.
StatisticdfsignificancePrevalence0.92360.528Salinity0.83360.114
description: Published as part of Qin, Tian, Hu, Guangran, Cheng, Jiangwen, Chen, Fanglin, Fu, Peipei, Zhao, Weishan, Bu, Xialian, Cheng, Houda, Zou, Hong, Li, Wenxiang, Wu, Shangong, Wang, Guitang & Li, Ming, 2024, International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 23 on page 100894, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2023.100894, http://zenodo.org/record/10933796
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15153738
title: Table 7 in Investigation of Ichthyophthirius multifiliis infection in fish from natural water bodies in the Lhasa and Nagqu regions of Tibet

description: Table 7 Ichthyophthirius multifiliis infection in Schizopygopsis at different salinities.
LocationFN (n)IH (n)P (%)MS (‰) ± SDZa’ gya Zangbo943132.98%0.24 ± 0.27Cuona Lake632336.51%0.28 ± 0.1Boqu Zangbo472348.93%0.31 ± 0.1Cuoe Lake39717.95%4.01 ± 0.02North shore of Selincuo1516.67%4.64 ± 0.52Boqu Estuary2528.00%6.76 ± 0.42
description: Published as part of Qin, Tian, Hu, Guangran, Cheng, Jiangwen, Chen, Fanglin, Fu, Peipei, Zhao, Weishan, Bu, Xialian, Cheng, Houda, Zou, Hong, Li, Wenxiang, Wu, Shangong, Wang, Guitang & Li, Ming, 2024, International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 23 on page 100894, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2023.100894, http://zenodo.org/record/10933796
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15153727
title: Table 1 in Investigation of Ichthyophthirius multifiliis infection in fish from natural water bodies in the Lhasa and Nagqu regions of Tibet

description: Table 1 Freshwater fish species recorded in the Lahsa River basin and Nagqu regions, Tibet, and the number of fish infected with Ichthyophthirius multifiliis.
FamilySpeciesNumberNumberPrevalenceMean length (mm)Mean weight (g)Species authoritycollectedinfected(%)CobitidaeMisgurnus230–84.0 (31.0–150.0)4.6 (0.3–27.9)Cantor, 1842anguillicaudatusParamisgurnus dabryanus200–106.412.1 (10.9–13.2)Sauvage, 1878(104.3–108.5)CyprinidaeCarassius auratus1920–85.2 (34.0–219.2)20.7 (1.2–134.5)Linnaeus, 1758Cyprinus carpio70–189.0356.5 (32.8–2086.7)Linnaeus, 1758(100.0–420.0)Ptychobarbus dipogon60–355.7422.6 (395.1–454.3)Regan, 1905(343.0–366.0)Pseudorasbora parva290–60.1 (28.0–85.1)4.5 (0.2–68.3)Temminck and Schlegel,1846Schizothorax macropogon190–421.01280.7Regan, 1905(415.0–427.0)(1088.0–1473.4)Schizothorax oconnori190–376.4798.7 (219.5–1533.6)Lloyd, 1908(277.0–489.0)Schizothorax waltoni220–389.8948.4 (4.1–1288.1)Regan, 1905(64.0–511.0)Schizopygopsis thermalis1313123.66279.6329.4 (0.3–1055.0)Herzenstein, 1891(28.0–554.0)Schizopygopsis1665633.73307.0322.6 (78.9–777.0)Chen & Cao, 2000selincuoensis(161.0–460.0)Schizopygopsis781012.82108.542.2 (0.5–485.4)Regan, 1905younghusbandi(37.0–342.0)NemacheilidaeTriplophysa brevicauda431227.9165.5 (28.0–139.0)4.4 (0.3–21.3)Herzenstein, 1888Triplophysa tibetana20630.0089.9 (40.0–163.0)8.0 (0.4–41.7)Regan, 1905Triplophysa orientalis5211.9273.9 (29.0–122.0)4.8 (0.4–16.3)Herzenstein, 1888Triplophysa stenura5120.0058.0 (33.0–91.0)1.6 (0.5–4.4)Herzenstein, 1888Triplophysa stewartii130–69.9 (47.0–101.0)3.9 (0.8–8.5)Hora, 1922Triplophysa stoliczkae80–89.3 (42.0–136.0)6.7 (0.8–18.7)Steindachner,1866SiluridaeSilurus asotus130–217.175.6 (32.0–128.9)Linnaeus, 1758(149.2–256.0)
description: Published as part of Qin, Tian, Hu, Guangran, Cheng, Jiangwen, Chen, Fanglin, Fu, Peipei, Zhao, Weishan, Bu, Xialian, Cheng, Houda, Zou, Hong, Li, Wenxiang, Wu, Shangong, Wang, Guitang & Li, Ming, 2024, International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 23 on page 100894, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2023.100894, http://zenodo.org/record/10933796
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15153729
title: Table 2 in Investigation of Ichthyophthirius multifiliis infection in fish from natural water bodies in the Lhasa and Nagqu regions of Tibet

description: Table 2 Prevalence of freshwater fish species recorded in different localities in the Lhasa River basin and Nagqu region, Tibet, and the number, intensity, and abundance of I. multifiliis parasites infecting them.
SpeciesLocalityFN (n)IH (n)PN (n)MAP (%)MISchizopygopsis selincuoensisZZ94318258.7832.9826.61BZ4723117224.9448.9450.96SL252441.768.0022.00Triplophysa tibetanaZZ17620212.6335.2933.67BZ3000.000.00–Triplophysa brevicaudaZZ15000.000.00–BZ12330225.1725.00100.67CNL16938323.9456.2542.56Schizopygopsis thermalisCEL3972205.6417.9531.43CNL6323127420.2236.5155.39SL1511016.736.67101.00ZZ14000.000.00–Triplophysa stenuraLR51204.0020.0020.00Schizopygopsis younghusbandiLR7810801.0312.828.00Triplophysa orientalisCNL161100.636.2510.00ZZ5000.000.00–LR18000.000.00–LW7000.000.00–Paramisgurnus dabryanusLW11000.000.00–LR9000.000.00–Carassius auratusLW174000.000.00–LR4000.000.00–CW14000.000.00–Schizothorax macropogonLR19000.000.00–Schizothorax waltoniLR18000.000.00–LW4000.000.00–Cyprinus carpioLW3000.000.00–LR2000.000.00–CW2000.000.00–Pseudorasbora parvaCW5000.000.00–LW24000.000.00–Misgurnus anguillicaudatusCW14000.000.00–LW9000.000.00–Silurus asotusCW7000.000.00–LW5000.000.00–LR1000.000.00–Ptychobarbus dipogonLW6000.000.00–Triplophysa stoliczkaeCNL8000.000.00–Schizothorax oconnoriLR19000.000.00–Triplophysa stewartiiCEL13000.000.00–
description: Published as part of Qin, Tian, Hu, Guangran, Cheng, Jiangwen, Chen, Fanglin, Fu, Peipei, Zhao, Weishan, Bu, Xialian, Cheng, Houda, Zou, Hong, Li, Wenxiang, Wu, Shangong, Wang, Guitang & Li, Ming, 2024, International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 23 on page 100894, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2023.100894, http://zenodo.org/record/10933796
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15153735
title: Table 6 in Investigation of Ichthyophthirius multifiliis infection in fish from natural water bodies in the Lhasa and Nagqu regions of Tibet

description: Table 6 Pairwise comparisons of locality.
Sample 1-Sam-TestStandardStandrad TestSignificantple 2StatisticErrorStatisticCW-BZ*15.3337.0332.1800.029LW-BZ*15.3336.3402.4190.016CW-CEL9.5008.0581.1790.238LW-CEL9.5007.4601.2730.203CW-CNL*16.2506.4602.5150.012LW-CNL*16.2505.6982.8520.004CW-LW0.0005.2750.0001.000CW-LR3.8005.2750.7200.471CW-ZZ9.0006.0911.4780.140CW-SL*16.5008.0582.0480.041LW-LR3.8004.3070.8820.378LW-ZZ9.0005.2751.7060.088LW-SL*16.5007.4602.2120.027LR-ZZ5.2005.2750.9860.324LR-CEL5.7007.4600.7640.445LR-BZ11.5336.3401.8190.069LR-CNL*12.4505.6982.1850.029LR-SL12.7007.4601.7020.089ZZ-CEL0.5008.0580.0620.951ZZ-BZ6.3337.0330.9000.368ZZ-CNL7.2506.4601.1220.262ZZ-SL7.5008.0580.9310.352CEL-BZ5.8338.7920.6640.507CEL-CNL6.7508.3400.8090.418CEL-SL7.0009.6310.7270.467BZ-CNL0.9177.3560.1250.901BZ-SL1.1678.7920.1330.894CNL-SL0.2508.3400.0300.976
description: Published as part of Qin, Tian, Hu, Guangran, Cheng, Jiangwen, Chen, Fanglin, Fu, Peipei, Zhao, Weishan, Bu, Xialian, Cheng, Houda, Zou, Hong, Li, Wenxiang, Wu, Shangong, Wang, Guitang & Li, Ming, 2024, International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 23 on page 100894, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2023.100894, http://zenodo.org/record/10933796
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15153739
title: Table 7 in Investigation of Ichthyophthirius multifiliis infection in fish from natural water bodies in the Lhasa and Nagqu regions of Tibet

description: Table 7 Ichthyophthirius multifiliis infection in Schizopygopsis at different salinities.
LocationFN (n)IH (n)P (%)MS (‰) ± SDZa’ gya Zangbo943132.98%0.24 ± 0.27Cuona Lake632336.51%0.28 ± 0.1Boqu Zangbo472348.93%0.31 ± 0.1Cuoe Lake39717.95%4.01 ± 0.02North shore of Selincuo1516.67%4.64 ± 0.52Boqu Estuary2528.00%6.76 ± 0.42
description: Published as part of Qin, Tian, Hu, Guangran, Cheng, Jiangwen, Chen, Fanglin, Fu, Peipei, Zhao, Weishan, Bu, Xialian, Cheng, Houda, Zou, Hong, Li, Wenxiang, Wu, Shangong, Wang, Guitang & Li, Ming, 2024, International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 23 on page 100894, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2023.100894, http://zenodo.org/record/10933796
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15153740
title: Table 8 in Investigation of Ichthyophthirius multifiliis infection in fish from natural water bodies in the Lhasa and Nagqu regions of Tibet

description: Table 8 Correlation analysis between salinity and prevalence.
PrevalenceSalinityPrevalencePearson correlation Significant (2-tailed) N1 – 6.914*.011 6SalinityPearson correlation Significant (2-tailed) N.914*.011 61 – 6
description: Published as part of Qin, Tian, Hu, Guangran, Cheng, Jiangwen, Chen, Fanglin, Fu, Peipei, Zhao, Weishan, Bu, Xialian, Cheng, Houda, Zou, Hong, Li, Wenxiang, Wu, Shangong, Wang, Guitang & Li, Ming, 2024, International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 23 on page 100894, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2023.100894, http://zenodo.org/record/10933796
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15153741
title: Table 8 in Investigation of Ichthyophthirius multifiliis infection in fish from natural water bodies in the Lhasa and Nagqu regions of Tibet

description: Table 8 Correlation analysis between salinity and prevalence.
PrevalenceSalinityPrevalencePearson correlation Significant (2-tailed) N1 – 6.914*.011 6SalinityPearson correlation Significant (2-tailed) N.914*.011 61 – 6
description: Published as part of Qin, Tian, Hu, Guangran, Cheng, Jiangwen, Chen, Fanglin, Fu, Peipei, Zhao, Weishan, Bu, Xialian, Cheng, Houda, Zou, Hong, Li, Wenxiang, Wu, Shangong, Wang, Guitang & Li, Ming, 2024, International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 23 on page 100894, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2023.100894, http://zenodo.org/record/10933796
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15153742
title: TABLE 1. A in A new species of Guadua (Poaceae: Bambusoideae: Guaduinae) from Pará state in Amazonian Brazil

description: TABLE 1. A morphological comparison of the vegetative characters of Guadua leonardoana and the other species within Guadua weberbaueri group: G. chaparensis, G. incana, G. sarcocarpa, G. weberbaueri.
CharacterG. leonardoanaG. chaparensisG. incanaG. sarcocarpaG. weberbaueriCulmculm height (m)15–2018–2510–15(–18)10–20(–30)8–15(–20)internode length (cm)30–7022–7020–6525–9025–90diameter (cm)5–10(3.5–)7–127–9(–12)8–104–8(–12)wall thickness (mm)4.1–7.110–1510–151010–15supranodal ridgenot prominentprominentslightly prominentslightly prominentslightly prominentCulm leafsheath length (cm)21.5–42.829–57(22–)30–4413–40(–50)(11.5–)32.3–46.5sheath width (cm)28–38.535–5429–4413–20(–25)(13.3–)22–40.8inner ligule length (mm)0.7–10.5–10.5–12–31–3blade length (cm)9.1–12.5(3.5–)5–10(3.5–)5–103–9(–11)(2.9–)4.9–9.2blade width (cm)13–14.57–127–123–64.9–11.6blade / sheath length ratio1/2.3–1/3.41/4–1/51/4–1/51/4–1/51/4–1/6.6auriclesabsentabsentabsentabsentabsent / presentPseudopetiolelength (mm)1.1–1.62–42–4(4–)6–105–7abaxial indumentglabrousglabrousglabrousglabroussetose-piloseFoliage leaf bladelength (cm)5.9–23.4(5–)15–23(–25)(3.5–)11–13(–16)13–24(–34)13–29.8width (cm)0.6–1.4(0.6–)1.3–2(0.7–)1–2(–2.2)(1.5–)1.8–3.5(–4)2–8.5Geographic distributionBrazil (Pará)BoliviaColombiaBolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Peru, Surinam, Venezuela, and Brazil (Acre and Amazonas)Peru and Brazil (Acre, Amazonas, and Rondônia)
description: Published as part of Afonso, Edgar Augusto Lobato, Clark, Lynn G., Mansano, Vidal De Freitas, Filgueira, Joana Patrícia Pantoja Serrão & Viana, Pedro Lage, 2023, A new species of Guadua (Poaceae: Bambusoideae: Guaduinae) from Pará state in Amazonian Brazil, pp. 213 in Phytotaxa 597 (3) on page 213, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.597.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/7958552
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15153744
title: TABLE 1 in Cyphellostereum indicum (Hygrophoraceae), a new species of basidiolichen from India

description: TABLE 1. Comparison of different species of Cyphellostereum with C. indicum and sequence data. The new species is in bold.
SpeciesHymenophoreBasidiaBasidiosporesCyanobacterial filamentsHyphal sheathIntracellular haustoriaClamp connectionsType localitySequence dataReferences1C. bicolor Lücking & TimdalResupinate, irregular——7–9 × 5–6 μmIrregular, leaving interspacesAbsentAbsentMauritius—Lücking & Timdal (2016)2C. brasiliense RyvardenPileate, round to slightly spatulateClavate; 18–25 × 5–6 μmOblong ellipsoid: 7–8 × 3.5–4.5 μm———AbsentBrazil—Ryvarden (2010)3C. galapagoense (Yánez, Dal- Forno & Bungartz) Dal-Forno, Bungartz & Lücking———7–10 × 5–10 μmJigsaw puzzle-shaped completely closedPresentAbsentEcuadorITSDal-Forno et al. (2017)4C. georgianum Dal-Forno, McMullin & LückingResupinate to corticioid——7–12.5 × 5–10 μmIrregular, leaving interspacesAbsentPresentUSAITSDal-Forno et al. (2019)5C. imperfectum Lücking, Barillas & Dal-Forno———7–10 × 3–6 µmIrregular, leaving interspaces—AbsentGuatemalaITS, nuLSU, RPB2Yánez et al. (2012)6C. indicum S. Nayaka and A. DebnathStipulate, flabelliformClavate, 16.7–20.11 × 2.5–5.5 μmIrregular to pip shaped, smooth, simple, 3.18–4.9 × 2.06–2.9 μm6–8 × 5.1–6.9 μmLoosely wrapping photobiont filamentSuperficialAbsentIndiaITSThis article7C. jamesianum Dal-Forno & KaminskyResupinate——11–13 × 4–6 μmIrregular, leaving interspaces—PresentUSAITSDal-Forno et al. (2019)8C. mucuyense V. MarcanoResupinate to corticioidBasidia scattered 25–40 × 5–7 μmSubglobose, non- septate, hyaline, 5-7 μm8–10 × 4–9 μmRegular in lateral outlineNot penetratingPresentVenezuela—Marcano (2022)9C. muscicola (Pat.) D.A. ReidSpathulate20 × 4 μm————AbsentJava—Reid (1965)10C. nitidum (Lücking) Lücking————strongly appressed photobiont, loose hyphal sheath——GalapagosRPB2Yánez et al. (2012)11C. phyllogenum (Müll. Arg.) Lücking, Dal-Forno & Lawrey———6–12 × 7μmWith a regular hyphal sheath—AbsentBorneoITS, nuLSUParmasto (1978)12C. rivulorum (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) D.A. ReidShortly stipitateClavate; 30 × 5 μm2.5–3,5 × 2–2.5 μm———AbsentCuba—Reid (1965)13C. unoquinoum Dal-Forno, Bungartz & Lücking———7.5 – 11 × 5–7 μmIrregular, leaving interspaceAbsentAbsentEcuadorITSDal-Forno et al. (2017)14C. ushimanum H. Masumoto & Y. DegawaResupinateClavate to short- cylindrical; 9.4–13.0 × 5.4– 6.5 μmEllipsoid, 5.3–6.3 × 3.4–4.0 μm5.5–8.6 x 3.3–7.3 μmIrregular, leaving interspacesPresentAbsentJapanITS, nuLSUMasumoto & Degawa (2022)
description: Published as part of Nayaka, Sanjeeva & Debnath, Ambikesh, 2023, Cyphellostereum indicum (Hygrophoraceae), a new species of basidiolichen from India, pp. 274 in Phytotaxa 603 (3) on page 274, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.603.3.6, http://zenodo.org/record/8166743
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15153745
title: TABLE 1 in Cyphellostereum indicum (Hygrophoraceae), a new species of basidiolichen from India

description: TABLE 1. Comparison of different species of Cyphellostereum with C. indicum and sequence data. The new species is in bold.
SpeciesHymenophoreBasidiaBasidiosporesCyanobacterial filamentsHyphal sheathIntracellular haustoriaClamp connectionsType localitySequence dataReferences1C. bicolor Lücking & TimdalResupinate, irregular——7–9 × 5–6 μmIrregular, leaving interspacesAbsentAbsentMauritius—Lücking & Timdal (2016)2C. brasiliense RyvardenPileate, round to slightly spatulateClavate; 18–25 × 5–6 μmOblong ellipsoid: 7–8 × 3.5–4.5 μm———AbsentBrazil—Ryvarden (2010)3C. galapagoense (Yánez, Dal- Forno & Bungartz) Dal-Forno, Bungartz & Lücking———7–10 × 5–10 μmJigsaw puzzle-shaped completely closedPresentAbsentEcuadorITSDal-Forno et al. (2017)4C. georgianum Dal-Forno, McMullin & LückingResupinate to corticioid——7–12.5 × 5–10 μmIrregular, leaving interspacesAbsentPresentUSAITSDal-Forno et al. (2019)5C. imperfectum Lücking, Barillas & Dal-Forno———7–10 × 3–6 µmIrregular, leaving interspaces—AbsentGuatemalaITS, nuLSU, RPB2Yánez et al. (2012)6C. indicum S. Nayaka and A. DebnathStipulate, flabelliformClavate, 16.7–20.11 × 2.5–5.5 μmIrregular to pip shaped, smooth, simple, 3.18–4.9 × 2.06–2.9 μm6–8 × 5.1–6.9 μmLoosely wrapping photobiont filamentSuperficialAbsentIndiaITSThis article7C. jamesianum Dal-Forno & KaminskyResupinate——11–13 × 4–6 μmIrregular, leaving interspaces—PresentUSAITSDal-Forno et al. (2019)8C. mucuyense V. MarcanoResupinate to corticioidBasidia scattered 25–40 × 5–7 μmSubglobose, non- septate, hyaline, 5-7 μm8–10 × 4–9 μmRegular in lateral outlineNot penetratingPresentVenezuela—Marcano (2022)9C. muscicola (Pat.) D.A. ReidSpathulate20 × 4 μm————AbsentJava—Reid (1965)10C. nitidum (Lücking) Lücking————strongly appressed photobiont, loose hyphal sheath——GalapagosRPB2Yánez et al. (2012)11C. phyllogenum (Müll. Arg.) Lücking, Dal-Forno & Lawrey———6–12 × 7μmWith a regular hyphal sheath—AbsentBorneoITS, nuLSUParmasto (1978)12C. rivulorum (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) D.A. ReidShortly stipitateClavate; 30 × 5 μm2.5–3,5 × 2–2.5 μm———AbsentCuba—Reid (1965)13C. unoquinoum Dal-Forno, Bungartz & Lücking———7.5 – 11 × 5–7 μmIrregular, leaving interspaceAbsentAbsentEcuadorITSDal-Forno et al. (2017)14C. ushimanum H. Masumoto & Y. DegawaResupinateClavate to short- cylindrical; 9.4–13.0 × 5.4– 6.5 μmEllipsoid, 5.3–6.3 × 3.4–4.0 μm5.5–8.6 x 3.3–7.3 μmIrregular, leaving interspacesPresentAbsentJapanITS, nuLSUMasumoto & Degawa (2022)
description: Published as part of Nayaka, Sanjeeva & Debnath, Ambikesh, 2023, Cyphellostereum indicum (Hygrophoraceae), a new species of basidiolichen from India, pp. 274 in Phytotaxa 603 (3) on page 274, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.603.3.6, http://zenodo.org/record/8166743
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15153743
title: TABLE 1. A in A new species of Guadua (Poaceae: Bambusoideae: Guaduinae) from Pará state in Amazonian Brazil

description: TABLE 1. A morphological comparison of the vegetative characters of Guadua leonardoana and the other species within Guadua weberbaueri group: G. chaparensis, G. incana, G. sarcocarpa, G. weberbaueri.
CharacterG. leonardoanaG. chaparensisG. incanaG. sarcocarpaG. weberbaueriCulmculm height (m)15–2018–2510–15(–18)10–20(–30)8–15(–20)internode length (cm)30–7022–7020–6525–9025–90diameter (cm)5–10(3.5–)7–127–9(–12)8–104–8(–12)wall thickness (mm)4.1–7.110–1510–151010–15supranodal ridgenot prominentprominentslightly prominentslightly prominentslightly prominentCulm leafsheath length (cm)21.5–42.829–57(22–)30–4413–40(–50)(11.5–)32.3–46.5sheath width (cm)28–38.535–5429–4413–20(–25)(13.3–)22–40.8inner ligule length (mm)0.7–10.5–10.5–12–31–3blade length (cm)9.1–12.5(3.5–)5–10(3.5–)5–103–9(–11)(2.9–)4.9–9.2blade width (cm)13–14.57–127–123–64.9–11.6blade / sheath length ratio1/2.3–1/3.41/4–1/51/4–1/51/4–1/51/4–1/6.6auriclesabsentabsentabsentabsentabsent / presentPseudopetiolelength (mm)1.1–1.62–42–4(4–)6–105–7abaxial indumentglabrousglabrousglabrousglabroussetose-piloseFoliage leaf bladelength (cm)5.9–23.4(5–)15–23(–25)(3.5–)11–13(–16)13–24(–34)13–29.8width (cm)0.6–1.4(0.6–)1.3–2(0.7–)1–2(–2.2)(1.5–)1.8–3.5(–4)2–8.5Geographic distributionBrazil (Pará)BoliviaColombiaBolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Peru, Surinam, Venezuela, and Brazil (Acre and Amazonas)Peru and Brazil (Acre, Amazonas, and Rondônia)
description: Published as part of Afonso, Edgar Augusto Lobato, Clark, Lynn G., Mansano, Vidal De Freitas, Filgueira, Joana Patrícia Pantoja Serrão & Viana, Pedro Lage, 2023, A new species of Guadua (Poaceae: Bambusoideae: Guaduinae) from Pará state in Amazonian Brazil, pp. 213 in Phytotaxa 597 (3) on page 213, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.597.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/7958552