cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc24nv5v
title: CCDC 1986237: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Tatsiana V. Petrasheuskaya, Márton A. Kiss, Orsolya Dömötör, Tamás Holczbauer, Nóra V. May, Gabriella Spengler, Annamária Kincses, Ana Čipak Gašparović, Éva Frank, Éva A. Enyedy|2020|New J.Chem.|44|12154|doi:10.1039/D0NJ01070G
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2534jz
title: CCDC 1999020: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Mingming Zhao, Yan Wang, Niannian Wu, Jun Zhang, Bo Liu|2020|Dalton Trans.|49|9662|doi:10.1039/D0DT01945C
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3980845
title: Rainforest and cloud forest Scolytodes (Curculionidae, Scolytinae, Hexacolini) from the Arthropods of La Selva inventory in Costa Rica: new species, new synonymy, new records

description: Quantitative collecting efforts over the last several decades in Costa Rica have resulted in many new species of insects. The Arthropods of La Selva projects included collecting from a typical lowland Neotropical forest and up an altitudinal transect, and has provided many valuable samples of insects, spiders and mites potentially new to science. We describe 18 new species in the bark beetle genus <em>Scolytodes</em> Ferrari, 1867, 14 of which were collected during this project: <em>S. angulus</em> Jordal & Kirkendall, <strong>sp. nov</strong>., <em>S. sufflatus</em> Jordal & Kirkendall, <strong>sp. nov</strong>., <em>S. squamatifrons</em> Jordal & Kirkendall, <strong>sp. nov.</strong>, <em>S. comosus</em> Jordal & Kirkendall, <strong>sp. nov.</strong>, <em>S. spatulatus</em> Jordal & Kirkendall, <strong>sp. nov.</strong>, <em>S. seriatus</em> Jordal & Kirkendall, <strong>sp. nov.</strong>, <em>S. profundus</em> Jordal & Kirkendall, <strong>sp. nov.</strong>, <em>S. catinus</em> Jordal & Kirkendall, <strong>sp. nov.</strong>, <em>S. fimbriatus</em> Jordal & Kirkendall, <strong>sp. nov.</strong>, <em>S. sulcifrons</em> Jordal & Kirkendall, <strong>sp. nov.</strong>, <em>S. planifrons</em> Jordal & Kirkendall, <strong>sp. nov.</strong>, <em>S. porosus</em> Jordal & Kirkendall, <strong>sp. nov.</strong>, <em>S. mundus</em> Jordal & Kirkendall, <strong>sp. nov.</strong>, <em>S. callosus</em> Jordal & Kirkendall, <strong>sp. nov.</strong>, <em>S. parvipilus</em> Jordal & Kirkendall, <strong>sp. nov.</strong>, <em>S. plenus</em> Jordal & Kirkendall, <strong>sp. nov.</strong>, <em>S. niger</em> Jordal & Kirkendall, <strong>sp. nov.</strong>, and <em>S. simplex</em> Jordal & Kirkendall, <strong>sp. nov.</strong> One species, <em>Scolytodes minutissimus</em> Schedl, 1952, is redescribed to match the holotype. We give new Costa Rica records for <em>S. costabilis</em> Wood, 1974, which is the correct name for <em>S. obesus</em> Wood, 1975 (<strong>syn. nov</strong>.). We report Costa Rica as a new country record for six species: <em>Scolytodes clusiacolens</em> Wood, 1967, <em>S. crinalis</em> Wood, 1978, <em>S. culcitatus</em> (Blandford, 1897), <em>S. libidus</em> Wood, 1978, <em>S. reticulatus</em> (Wood, 1961), and <em>S. spadix</em> (Blackman, 1943). From a closely related genus, we provide the first record for Central America (and only the second collection) of <em>Pycnarthrum fulgidum</em> Wood, 1977.
DOI: 10.23636/1196
title: Indexes to the Dispatches of the East India Company Court of Directors to Indian Governments

description: The IOR/E/4 Correspondence with India comprises 1112 volumes dating from 1703-1858. The material is arranged into eight series: four series of letters received by the Court of Directors from the administration in India; and four series of dispatches sent by the Court to the same administrations. Subject, name and place access for the dispatches to India is provided through 72 index volumes, catalogued as IOR/Z/E/4, which contain around 430,000 entries. The original indexes were produced between 1901 and 1929 by the staff of the Secretarial Bureau, led by indexing pioneer Mary Petherbridge.

When these index entries came to be converted to the British Library archives catalogue in the early 2010s, a decision was made that entries were to be child items of the index volumes themselves, with related correspondence volumes and page ranges entered as a text string in the Related Material field. This made it difficult to determine the contents of particular volumes, and to identify incomplete references. Using Python and the Pandas library information in the Related Material fields has been separated out, and entries re-written so that each individual index entry and correspondence volume reference occupies a single row. This work was undertaken as part of a work-based project for the post-graduate certificate in Data Science for Information Professionals at Birkbeck University.
DOI: 10.15468/338hc3
title: Rainforest and cloud forest Scolytodes (Curculionidae, Scolytinae, Hexacolini) from the Arthropods of La Selva inventory in Costa Rica: new species, new synonymy, new records

description: Quantitative collecting efforts over the last several decades in Costa Rica have resulted in many new species of insects. The Arthropods of La Selva projects included collecting from a typical lowland Neotropical forest and up an altitudinal transect, and has provided many valuable samples of insects, spiders and mites potentially new to science. We describe 18 new species in the bark beetle genus Scolytodes Ferrari, 1867, 14 of which were collected during this project: S. angulus Jordal & Kirkendall, sp. nov., S. sufflatus Jordal & Kirkendall, sp. nov., S. squamatifrons Jordal & Kirkendall, sp. nov., S. comosus Jordal & Kirkendall, sp. nov., S. spatulatus Jordal & Kirkendall, sp. nov., S. seriatus Jordal & Kirkendall, sp. nov., S. profundus Jordal & Kirkendall, sp. nov., S. catinus Jordal & Kirkendall, sp. nov., S. fimbriatus Jordal & Kirkendall, sp. nov., S. sulcifrons Jordal & Kirkendall, sp. nov., S. planifrons Jordal & Kirkendall, sp. nov., S. porosus Jordal & Kirkendall, sp. nov., S. mundus Jordal & Kirkendall, sp. nov., S. callosus Jordal & Kirkendall, sp. nov., S. parvipilus Jordal & Kirkendall, sp. nov., S. plenus Jordal & Kirkendall, sp. nov., S. niger Jordal & Kirkendall, sp. nov., and S. simplex Jordal & Kirkendall, sp. nov. One species, Scolytodes minutissimus Schedl, 1952, is redescribed to match the holotype. We give new Costa Rica records for S. costabilis Wood, 1974, which is the correct name for S. obesus Wood, 1975 (syn. nov.). We report Costa Rica as a new country record for six species: Scolytodes clusiacolens Wood, 1967, S. crinalis Wood, 1978, S. culcitatus (Blandford, 1897), S. libidus Wood, 1978, S. reticulatus (Wood, 1961), and S. spadix (Blackman, 1943). From a closely related genus, we provide the first record for Central America (and only the second collection) of Pycnarthrum fulgidum Wood, 1977.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3980870
title: Hidden gems in museum cabinets: new species and new distributional records of Scolytodes (Coleoptera: Scolytinae)

description: Twenty-one new species of Scolytodes Ferrari are described from Central and South America: Scolytodes cavus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes excavatus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes speculofrons Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes potens Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes minimus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes setosicauda Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes monticola Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes aureifrons Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes piliscapus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes curvicostatus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes vellus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes granulatus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes bipilosus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes asperatus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes flavifrons Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes capillus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes rufus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes johnsoni Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes longipilus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes prolatus Jordal, sp. nov., and Scolytodes bicarinatus Jordal, sp. nov. Females of two species were associated with males and described for the first time: Scolytodes pelicipennis (Schedl, 1952) from Mexico, and Scolytodes venustulus Wood, 1967 from Costa Rica. New synonymies were inferred in four species: Scolytodes bolivianus Eggers, 1928 (=Scolytodes aequipunctatus Eggers, 1943 syn. nov.); Scolytodes major Eggers, 1928 (=Scolytodes argentinensis Eggers, 1943 syn. nov.; =Scolytodes boliviensis Eggers, 1928; =Scolytodes similis Eggers, 1928 syn. nov.); Scolytodes ingae (Blackman, 1943), stat. nov. (=Scolytodes trigonus Jordal, 2013 syn. nov.); Scolytodes canalis Wood, 1974 (=Scolytodes amabilis Wood, 1975 syn. nov.). New country records are reported for 13 species: S. alni Wood, 1969 (Panama), S. bolivianus (Brazil), S. canalis Wood, 1974 (Guatemala), S. chapuisi Wood, 1977 (Peru, Brazil), S. costabilis Wood (Costa Rica), S. elongatus Schedl, 1935 (Panama), S. immanis Wood, 1969 (Panama), S. ingae (Blackman, 1943) (Panama), S. irazuensis Wood, 1969 (Panama), S. major (Honduras, Brazil), S. pelicipennis (Schedl, 1952) (Mexico), S. triangulus Jordal, 1998 (Panama), S. unipunctatus (Blandford, 1897) (Panama, Venezuela), S. venustulus Wood, 1967 (Costa Rica).
DOI: 10.15468/86pfgw
title: Hidden gems in museum cabinets: new species and new distributional records of Scolytodes (Coleoptera: Scolytinae)

description: Twenty-one new species of Scolytodes Ferrari are described from Central and South America: Scolytodes cavus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes excavatus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes speculofrons Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes potens Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes minimus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes setosicauda Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes monticola Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes aureifrons Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes piliscapus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes curvicostatus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes vellus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes granulatus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes bipilosus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes asperatus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes flavifrons Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes capillus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes rufus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes johnsoni Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes longipilus Jordal, sp. nov., Scolytodes prolatus Jordal, sp. nov., and Scolytodes bicarinatus Jordal, sp. nov. Females of two species were associated with males and described for the first time: Scolytodes pelicipennis (Schedl, 1952) from Mexico, and Scolytodes venustulus Wood, 1967 from Costa Rica. New synonymies were inferred in four species: Scolytodes bolivianus Eggers, 1928 (=Scolytodes aequipunctatus Eggers, 1943 syn. nov.); Scolytodes major Eggers, 1928 (=Scolytodes argentinensis Eggers, 1943 syn. nov.; =Scolytodes boliviensis Eggers, 1928; =Scolytodes similis Eggers, 1928 syn. nov.); Scolytodes ingae (Blackman, 1943), stat. nov. (=Scolytodes trigonus Jordal, 2013 syn. nov.); Scolytodes canalis Wood, 1974 (=Scolytodes amabilis Wood, 1975 syn. nov.). New country records are reported for 13 species: S. alni Wood, 1969 (Panama), S. bolivianus (Brazil), S. canalis Wood, 1974 (Guatemala), S. chapuisi Wood, 1977 (Peru, Brazil), S. costabilis Wood (Costa Rica), S. elongatus Schedl, 1935 (Panama), S. immanis Wood, 1969 (Panama), S. ingae (Blackman, 1943) (Panama), S. irazuensis Wood, 1969 (Panama), S. major (Honduras, Brazil), S. pelicipennis (Schedl, 1952) (Mexico), S. triangulus Jordal, 1998 (Panama), S. unipunctatus (Blandford, 1897) (Panama, Venezuela), S. venustulus Wood, 1967 (Costa Rica).
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3979207
title: Kotliarov 2020 Vaccine Responsiveness PBMC dataset for Besca

description: Kotliarov, Y., Sparks, R., Martins, A.J. <em>et al.</em> Broad immune activation underlies shared set point signatures for vaccine responsiveness in healthy individuals and disease activity in patients with lupus. <em>Nat Med</em> <strong>26, </strong>618–629 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0769-8. We reprocessed the dataset using the Besca package (https://github.com/bedapub/besca). The original gene expression data are available from https://doi.org/10.35092/yhjc.c.4753772.
description: {"references": ["Kotliarov, Y., Sparks, R., Martins, A.J. et al. Broad immune activation underlies shared set point signatures for vaccine responsiveness in healthy individuals and disease activity in patients with lupus. Nat Med 26, 618\u2013629 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0769-8"]}
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3980819
title: Pictogramas ARASAAC Color, Part 6 of 16

description: Black and white pictograms created by Sergio Palao (http://www.palao.es) for ARASAAC (http://www.arasac.org).
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3980818
title: Pictogramas ARASAAC Color, Part 6 of 16

description: Black and white pictograms created by Sergio Palao (http://www.palao.es) for ARASAAC (http://www.arasac.org).
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3890293
title: Package Freshness in Linux Distributions

description: Edit: this version is obsolete, a new version with a larger dataset has been made available. This is a survey conducted on the package freshness in Linux distributions. The survey can be found here. An anonymised version of the responses is included, in csv format: - The first 3 columns correspond to the answers to the first question, that is to say the ranking of the distributions used by respondents. - The "perception" columns correspond to the answers to the second question: "according to you, how long does it take for the latest upstream version to be made available in the official repositories of that distribution?" Packages were divided into 6 categories: OSS: open-source end-user software, such as Firefox, LibreOffice or GIMP;<br> PS: proprietary end-user software, such as Adobe Reader, Spotify or Skype;<br> DT: development tools, such as git, Emacs or Eclipse;<br> STL: system tools and libraries, such as openSSL;<br> PLL: programming language libraries, such as Numpy, Lodash or Boost;<br> PLR: programming language runtimes such as Python, node.js or Java. - The "importance" columns correspond to the answers to the third question: "how important is it for you to stay up to date with upstream packages of the following types?" - The "reasons" columns correspond to the answers to the fourth question: "what are your main reasons for updating packages?" - The "mechanisms" columns correspond to the answers to the fifth question: "which mechanism do you use to install specific versions of packages?" The possible mechanisms are: Official package manager the distribution and its official repository (off), Official package manager of the distribution with community repositories (com), Third-party package managers (3rd) Installing manually from binaries (bin) Installing manually from source files (sources)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3821973
title: Package Freshness in Linux Distributions

description: Edit: this version is obsolete, a new version with a larger dataset has been made available. This is a survey conducted on the package freshness in Linux distributions. The survey can be found here. An anonymised version of the responses is included, in csv format: - The first 3 columns correspond to the answers to the first question, that is to say the ranking of the distributions used by respondents. - The "perception" columns correspond to the answers to the second question: "according to you, how long does it take for the latest upstream version to be made available in the official repositories of that distribution?" Packages were divided into 6 categories: OSS: open-source end-user software, such as Firefox, LibreOffice or GIMP;<br> PS: proprietary end-user software, such as Adobe Reader, Spotify or Skype;<br> DT: development tools, such as git, Emacs or Eclipse;<br> STL: system tools and libraries, such as openSSL;<br> PLL: programming language libraries, such as Numpy, Lodash or Boost;<br> PLR: programming language runtimes such as Python, node.js or Java. - The "importance" columns correspond to the answers to the third question: "how important is it for you to stay up to date with upstream packages of the following types?" - The "reasons" columns correspond to the answers to the fourth question: "what are your main reasons for updating packages?" - The "mechanisms" columns correspond to the answers to the fifth question: "which mechanism do you use to install specific versions of packages?" The possible mechanisms are: Official package manager the distribution and its official repository (off), Official package manager of the distribution with community repositories (com), Third-party package managers (3rd) Installing manually from binaries (bin) Installing manually from source files (sources)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3980894
title: SciGRID_gas INET_Raw

description: The INET_raw dataset is an outcome of the SciGRID_gas project The data set contains geographical and meta information on the European gas transport network. The data originats from an internet research of Wikipedia, gas transmission system operators fact sheets, maps, press releases and more. Hence, most of the data had to be extracted by hand. The data is being stored in both CSV and GeoJSON files.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3908332
title: Package Freshness in Linux Distributions.

description: Survey conducted on the package freshness in Linux distributions. A preprint of the paper can be found here. The survey form can be found here. An anonymised version of the responses is included, in csv format: - The first 3 columns correspond to the answers to the first question, that is to say the ranking of the distributions used by respondents. - The "perception" columns correspond to the answers to the second question: "according to you, how long does it take for the latest upstream version to be made available in the official repositories of that distribution?" Packages were divided into 6 categories: OSS: open-source end-user software, such as Firefox, LibreOffice or GIMP;<br> PS: proprietary end-user software, such as Adobe Reader, Spotify or Skype;<br> DT: development tools, such as git, Emacs or Eclipse;<br> STL: system tools and libraries, such as openSSL;<br> PLL: programming language libraries, such as Numpy, Lodash or Boost;<br> PLR: programming language runtimes such as Python, node.js or Java. - The "importance" columns correspond to the answers to the third question: "how important is it for you to stay up to date with upstream packages of the following types?" - The "reasons" columns correspond to the answers to the fourth question: "what are your main reasons for updating packages?" - The "mechanisms" columns correspond to the answers to the fifth question: "which mechanism do you use to install specific versions of packages?" The possible mechanisms are: Official package manager the distribution and its official repository (off), Official package manager of the distribution with community repositories (com), Third-party package managers (3rd) Installing manually from binaries (bin) Installing manually from source files (sources)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3908331
title: Package Freshness in Linux Distributions.

description: Survey conducted on the package freshness in Linux distributions. A preprint of the paper can be found here. The survey form can be found here. An anonymised version of the responses is included, in csv format: - The first 3 columns correspond to the answers to the first question, that is to say the ranking of the distributions used by respondents. - The "perception" columns correspond to the answers to the second question: "according to you, how long does it take for the latest upstream version to be made available in the official repositories of that distribution?" Packages were divided into 6 categories: OSS: open-source end-user software, such as Firefox, LibreOffice or GIMP;<br> PS: proprietary end-user software, such as Adobe Reader, Spotify or Skype;<br> DT: development tools, such as git, Emacs or Eclipse;<br> STL: system tools and libraries, such as openSSL;<br> PLL: programming language libraries, such as Numpy, Lodash or Boost;<br> PLR: programming language runtimes such as Python, node.js or Java. - The "importance" columns correspond to the answers to the third question: "how important is it for you to stay up to date with upstream packages of the following types?" - The "reasons" columns correspond to the answers to the fourth question: "what are your main reasons for updating packages?" - The "mechanisms" columns correspond to the answers to the fifth question: "which mechanism do you use to install specific versions of packages?" The possible mechanisms are: Official package manager the distribution and its official repository (off), Official package manager of the distribution with community repositories (com), Third-party package managers (3rd) Installing manually from binaries (bin) Installing manually from source files (sources)
DOI: 10.25573/data.12403865.v1
title: No 2. DADA2 Workflow

description: Output files from the No 2. DADA2 Workflow page of the Bocas Hypoxia study. <br>File names and descriptions:<br><b>RUN01_read_changes.txt</b>: Tracking changes in read counts (per sample) from the beginning to end of the DADA2 workflow.<br><b>RUN02_read_changes.txt</b>: Tracking changes in read counts (per sample) from the beginning to end of the DADA2 workflow.<br><b>combo_pipeline.rdata: </b>contains sequence and taxonomy tables from the DADA2 pipeline needed for subsequent analyses. To see the <b>Objects</b>, in R run <i>load("combo_pipeline.rdata", verbose=TRUE)<br></i><br>1) seqtab.1: Sequence table from Run01 before merging with Run02.2) seqtab.1: Sequence table from Run02 before merging with Run01.3) st.sum: merged sequence table before removing chimeras4) st.all: duplicate of st.sum5) seqtab: merged sequence table after removing chimeras6) tax_silva: Silva (v132) taxonomy table of seqtab7) tax_gg: GreenGenes taxonomy table of seqtab<br>
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3980515
title: Web scraping de données publiques d'un échantillon de 11 ports européens

description: Web scraping du 25 au 27 juin 2020 de données publiques relatives à des enregistrements de navires d'un échantillon de 11 ports européens : Aarhus (DK), Amsterdam (NL), Bordeaux (FR), Copenhague (DK), Dunkerque (FR), Fredericia (DK), Hambourg (DE), Klaipeda (LT), Le Havre (FR), Niedersachsen (DE) et Rotterdam (NL).
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3980514
title: Web scraping de données publiques d'un échantillon de 11 ports européens

description: Web scraping du 25 au 27 juin 2020 de données publiques relatives à des enregistrements de navires d'un échantillon de 11 ports européens : Aarhus (DK), Amsterdam (NL), Bordeaux (FR), Copenhague (DK), Dunkerque (FR), Fredericia (DK), Hambourg (DE), Klaipeda (LT), Le Havre (FR), Niedersachsen (DE) et Rotterdam (NL).
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3980935
title: SciGRID_gas GIE_Raw

description: The INET_raw dataset is an outcome of the SciGRID_gas project The data set contains geographical and meta information on the European gas transport network. The data have been retrieved from the GIE Database. ‘Gas Infrastructure Europe (GIE) is an association representing the sole interest of the infrastructure industry in the<br> natural gas business, such as Transmission System Operators, Storage System Operators and LNG Terminal Operators. GIE has currently 68 members in 25 European countries.’ (https://www.gie.eu/) Hence, most of the data had to be extracted by hand. The data is being stored in both CSV and GeoJSON files.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3980896
title: Pictogramas ARASAAC Color, Part 7 of 16

description: Black and white pictograms created by Sergio Palao (http://www.palao.es) for ARASAAC (http://www.arasac.org).
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3980895
title: Pictogramas ARASAAC Color, Part 7 of 16

description: Black and white pictograms created by Sergio Palao (http://www.palao.es) for ARASAAC (http://www.arasac.org).
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc1353ky
title: CCDC 1017809: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Miki Hasegawa, Shoya Sakurai, Masafumi Andrew Yamaguchi, Daichi Iwasawa, Naho Yajima, Shuhei Ogata, Yudai Inazuka, Ayumi Ishii, Kengo Suzuki|2020|Photochem.Photobiol.Sci.|19|1054|doi:10.1039/D0PP00069H