cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558813.v1
title: Data Paper. Data Paper

description: File List BTZ_2005-2007_BreedingWaterfowl.csv (MD5: 5aa85c4862536fca79efcc83e6cbbb45) BTZ_2005-2007_Fishraw.csv (MD5: 37c679eecc5450d62382f525f5bdb810) BTZ_2005-2007_headers.csv (MD5: 76a09ae24bd8c035c661bf40f847ae15) BTZ_2005-2007_MoltingWaterfowl.csv (MD5: a911d6dc19b1a241211f110b39903abb) BTZ_2005-2007_WetlandHabitatGIS.csv (MD5: e96bcee9e8c8f423e28a0c787a045a85) BTZ_2005-2007_WetlandHabitatLimno.csv (MD5: 2a0f5b049be290f2d75c029685ad23b9) BTZ_2005-2007_WetlandHabitatTemporalIndicators.csv (MD5: 3261f35af3b0c3f413f0ea50e1deb137) BTZ_2005-5007_WetlandHabitatPhysicalSAV.csv (MD5: 484b2100db17492761d845f555078a03) Description Water quality, environment, agricultural land use, waterfowl, and fish community data were collected from wetlands in four landscapes (West Peace Lowlands, East Peace Lowlands, West Central, and East Central) in the Boreal Transition Zone (BTZ) of Alberta (AB) and with one landscape in British Columbia (East Peace Lowlands-BC) during May and August over three years (2005–2007). This data set is unique in that it provides comprehensive water quality sampling, habitat conditions, and associated breeding and molting waterfowl data over a 3-yr period, which includes a drought year. Land use in the BTZ has rapidly changed with at least 73% of the BTZ, particularly in Saskatchewan, AB, being converted from forest to agriculture since the early 20th century. The BTZ has experienced a drying trend over the past 60 years with the lowest cumulative effective precipitation since 1943 with a -2323 mm precipitation deficit recorded in 2006. A total of 723 and 489 wetlands were surveyed for waterfowl abundance during the breeding and molting seasons, respectively. A subset of 214 and 213 wetlands in May and August, respectively, was further sampled for habitat, limnology, and agricultural encroachment surrounding the wetland. A subset of 25 wetlands was sampled in 2006 for fish abundance data. This data set has been used in several papers in assessing the impact of drought and agricultural impact on water quality and wetland conditions, as well as drought and land use impacts on habitat associations between breeding and molting waterfowl and wetland condition. <i>Key words</i>: <i>agriculture; algae; Boreal Transition Zone, drought; fish; habitat; shallow lakes; submerged aquatic vegetation; water chemistry; waterfowl; wetlands.</i>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558810
title: Data Paper. Data Paper

description: File List Leaf_herbivory.csv (MD5: 4ee09b5d292087d92450c96fea54863c) Description Herbivory is viewed as a major driver of plant evolution and the most important energy pathway from plants to higher trophic levels. Therefore, understanding patterns of herbivory on plants remains a key focus in evolution and ecology. The evolutionary impacts of leaf herbivory include altering plant fitness, local adaptation, the evolution of defenses, and the diversification of plants as well as natural enemies. Leaf herbivory also impacts ecological processes such as plant productivity, community composition, and ecosystem nutrient cycling. Understanding the impact of herbivory on these ecological and evolutionary processes requires species-specific, as opposed to community-level, measures of herbivory. In addition, species-specific data enables the use of modern comparative methods to account for phylogenetic nonindependence. Although hundreds of studies have measured natural rates of leaf consumption, we are unaware of any accessible compilation of these data. We created such a data set to provide the raw data needed to test general hypotheses relating to plant–herbivore interactions and to test the influence of biotic and abiotic factors on herbivory rates across large spatial scales. A large repository will make this endeavor more efficient and robust. In total, we compiled 2641 population level measures for either annual or daily rates of leaf herbivory across 1145 species of vascular plants collected from 189 studies. All damage measures represent natural occurrences of herbivory that span numerous angiosperm, gymnosperm, and fern species. To enable researchers to explore the causes of variation in herbivory and how these might interact, we added information about the study sites including: geolocation, climate classification, habitat descriptions (e.g., seashore, grassland, forest, agricultural fields), and plant trait information concerning growth form and duration (e.g., annual vs. perennial). We also included extensive details of the methodology used to measure leaf damage, including seasons and months of sampling, age of leaves, and the method used to estimate percentage area missing. We anticipate that these data will make it possible to test important hypotheses in the plant–herbivore literature, including the plant apparency hypothesis, the latitudinal-herbivory defense hypothesis, the resource availability hypothesis, and the macroevolutionary escalation of defense hypothesis. <i>Key words</i>: <i>browsing; climatic variation; defoliation; folivory; global census; grazing; latitudinal gradients; leaf age; leaf consumption; plant–herbivore interactions; primary consumption; trophic interactions.</i>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558801
title: Appendix A. Taxonomic authorities, origin, and primary habitat type for species in the study.

description: Taxonomic authorities, origin, and primary habitat type for species in the study.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558798
title: Appendix B. Timing of peak abundance for each species.

description: Timing of peak abundance for each species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558798.v1
title: Appendix B. Timing of peak abundance for each species.

description: Timing of peak abundance for each species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558795
title: Appendix C. Statistical results for effects of month and habitat type on trait and phylogenetic diversity, and on average trait values.

description: Statistical results for effects of month and habitat type on trait and phylogenetic diversity, and on average trait values.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558795.v1
title: Appendix C. Statistical results for effects of month and habitat type on trait and phylogenetic diversity, and on average trait values.

description: Statistical results for effects of month and habitat type on trait and phylogenetic diversity, and on average trait values.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558792
title: Appendix D. Additional results for community richness, abundance, and composition.

description: Additional results for community richness, abundance, and composition.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558792.v1
title: Appendix D. Additional results for community richness, abundance, and composition.

description: Additional results for community richness, abundance, and composition.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558789
title: Appendix A. Detailed description of modeling methods and parameters.

description: Detailed description of modeling methods and parameters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558789.v1
title: Appendix A. Detailed description of modeling methods and parameters.

description: Detailed description of modeling methods and parameters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558786
title: Appendix B. Parameter abbreviations used in the model.

description: Parameter abbreviations used in the model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558783
title: Appendix C. Parameter coefficients used in the model to predict erosion, kelp production, grazing damage by Lacuna vincta on kelp blades, and kelp blade coverage by Membranipora membranacea.

description: Parameter coefficients used in the model to predict erosion, kelp production, grazing damage by Lacuna vincta on kelp blades, and kelp blade coverage by Membranipora membranacea.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558783.v1
title: Appendix C. Parameter coefficients used in the model to predict erosion, kelp production, grazing damage by Lacuna vincta on kelp blades, and kelp blade coverage by Membranipora membranacea.

description: Parameter coefficients used in the model to predict erosion, kelp production, grazing damage by Lacuna vincta on kelp blades, and kelp blade coverage by Membranipora membranacea.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558780
title: Appendix A. Predicted and observed soil water content in the upper 30 cm from January to December in 2008, together with daily rainfall during the same period.

description: Predicted and observed soil water content in the upper 30 cm from January to December in 2008, together with daily rainfall during the same period.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558780.v1
title: Appendix A. Predicted and observed soil water content in the upper 30 cm from January to December in 2008, together with daily rainfall during the same period.

description: Predicted and observed soil water content in the upper 30 cm from January to December in 2008, together with daily rainfall during the same period.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558777
title: Appendix B. Periods of the year and variables used to assess the abiotic controls on biomass production: relative soil water content and temperature.

description: Periods of the year and variables used to assess the abiotic controls on biomass production: relative soil water content and temperature.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558777.v1
title: Appendix B. Periods of the year and variables used to assess the abiotic controls on biomass production: relative soil water content and temperature.

description: Periods of the year and variables used to assess the abiotic controls on biomass production: relative soil water content and temperature.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558774
title: Appendix C. List of species on which traits were measured, together with their botanical family and life cycle.

description: List of species on which traits were measured, together with their botanical family and life cycle.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558774.v1
title: Appendix C. List of species on which traits were measured, together with their botanical family and life cycle.

description: List of species on which traits were measured, together with their botanical family and life cycle.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558771
title: Appendix D. Comparison of community-weighted means for Axis1, leaf dry matter content, and reproductive height calculated with traits value measured in the two treatments.

description: Comparison of community-weighted means for Axis1, leaf dry matter content, and reproductive height calculated with traits value measured in the two treatments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558771.v1
title: Appendix D. Comparison of community-weighted means for Axis1, leaf dry matter content, and reproductive height calculated with traits value measured in the two treatments.

description: Comparison of community-weighted means for Axis1, leaf dry matter content, and reproductive height calculated with traits value measured in the two treatments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558768
title: Appendix E. Results of Ljung-Box tests to investigate the autocorrelation structure in residuals of the models used in multiple regressions.

description: Results of Ljung-Box tests to investigate the autocorrelation structure in residuals of the models used in multiple regressions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558768.v1
title: Appendix E. Results of Ljung-Box tests to investigate the autocorrelation structure in residuals of the models used in multiple regressions.

description: Results of Ljung-Box tests to investigate the autocorrelation structure in residuals of the models used in multiple regressions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558765
title: Appendix F. AIC table for the candidate multiple regression models.

description: AIC table for the candidate multiple regression models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558765.v1
title: Appendix F. AIC table for the candidate multiple regression models.

description: AIC table for the candidate multiple regression models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558762
title: Appendix G. Trait ordination shown in the factorial plan 1–2 of the principal component analysis (PCA) performed on the community-weighted means matrix using data from the two treatments.

description: Trait ordination shown in the factorial plan 1–2 of the principal component analysis (PCA) performed on the community-weighted means matrix using data from the two treatments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558762.v1
title: Appendix G. Trait ordination shown in the factorial plan 1–2 of the principal component analysis (PCA) performed on the community-weighted means matrix using data from the two treatments.

description: Trait ordination shown in the factorial plan 1–2 of the principal component analysis (PCA) performed on the community-weighted means matrix using data from the two treatments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558759
title: Appendix H. Trait ordination shown in the factorial plan 1–2 of the PCA performed on the community-weighted means matrix using data from the grazed/fertilized treatment and temporal changes in Axis 1 of the PCA conducted on community-weighted mean of traits since 1980 in the grazed/fertilized treatment.

description: Trait ordination shown in the factorial plan 1–2 of the PCA performed on the community-weighted means matrix using data from the grazed/fertilized treatment and temporal changes in Axis 1 of the PCA conducted on community-weighted mean of traits since 1980 in the grazed/fertilized treatment.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558759.v1
title: Appendix H. Trait ordination shown in the factorial plan 1–2 of the PCA performed on the community-weighted means matrix using data from the grazed/fertilized treatment and temporal changes in Axis 1 of the PCA conducted on community-weighted mean of traits since 1980 in the grazed/fertilized treatment.

description: Trait ordination shown in the factorial plan 1–2 of the PCA performed on the community-weighted means matrix using data from the grazed/fertilized treatment and temporal changes in Axis 1 of the PCA conducted on community-weighted mean of traits since 1980 in the grazed/fertilized treatment.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558756
title: Appendix I. Deviation of annual values from the average for the period 1980–2004 for minimal and maximal temperatures, rainfall, and relative soil water content for the La Fage experimental station.

description: Deviation of annual values from the average for the period 1980–2004 for minimal and maximal temperatures, rainfall, and relative soil water content for the La Fage experimental station.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558756.v1
title: Appendix I. Deviation of annual values from the average for the period 1980–2004 for minimal and maximal temperatures, rainfall, and relative soil water content for the La Fage experimental station.

description: Deviation of annual values from the average for the period 1980–2004 for minimal and maximal temperatures, rainfall, and relative soil water content for the La Fage experimental station.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558753
title: Appendix J. Climatic and carry-over controls on biomass production for each harvest in the two treatments assessed with simple and multiple regressions.

description: Climatic and carry-over controls on biomass production for each harvest in the two treatments assessed with simple and multiple regressions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558753.v1
title: Appendix J. Climatic and carry-over controls on biomass production for each harvest in the two treatments assessed with simple and multiple regressions.

description: Climatic and carry-over controls on biomass production for each harvest in the two treatments assessed with simple and multiple regressions.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558750
title: Appendix K. Box and whisker plots of the average biomass produced for each harvest in the two treatments.

description: Box and whisker plots of the average biomass produced for each harvest in the two treatments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558750.v1
title: Appendix K. Box and whisker plots of the average biomass produced for each harvest in the two treatments.

description: Box and whisker plots of the average biomass produced for each harvest in the two treatments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558747
title: Appendix L. Relative abundance of the dominant species in the two treatments at the beginning of the fertilization experiment, in the middle and at the end of the study period.

description: Relative abundance of the dominant species in the two treatments at the beginning of the fertilization experiment, in the middle and at the end of the study period.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558747.v1
title: Appendix L. Relative abundance of the dominant species in the two treatments at the beginning of the fertilization experiment, in the middle and at the end of the study period.

description: Relative abundance of the dominant species in the two treatments at the beginning of the fertilization experiment, in the middle and at the end of the study period.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558744
title: Appendix A. Description of niche and fitness differences for our annual plant population model in a way that closely corresponds to how those terms are defined by Chesson (2000) for the Lotka-Volterra model.

description: Description of niche and fitness differences for our annual plant population model in a way that closely corresponds to how those terms are defined by Chesson (2000) for the Lotka-Volterra model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558741
title: Appendix B. Mean and standard error values for the competitive coefficients and vital rates calculated to parameterize our annual plant population model.

description: Mean and standard error values for the competitive coefficients and vital rates calculated to parameterize our annual plant population model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558738
title: Appendix A. A table showing properties and number of selected sites for each stream size class.

description: A table showing properties and number of selected sites for each stream size class.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558738.v1
title: Appendix A. A table showing properties and number of selected sites for each stream size class.

description: A table showing properties and number of selected sites for each stream size class.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558735
title: Appendix B. A figure showing the differences in species richness between groundwater (GW) discharge and non-discharge sites along all stream size classes displayed separately for till and sedimentary streams.

description: A figure showing the differences in species richness between groundwater (GW) discharge and non-discharge sites along all stream size classes displayed separately for till and sedimentary streams.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558735.v1
title: Appendix B. A figure showing the differences in species richness between groundwater (GW) discharge and non-discharge sites along all stream size classes displayed separately for till and sedimentary streams.

description: A figure showing the differences in species richness between groundwater (GW) discharge and non-discharge sites along all stream size classes displayed separately for till and sedimentary streams.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558732
title: Appendix C. A path analysis of direct and indirect effect of GW, soil pH, and C/N, stream size and stream type on species richness of riparian plant communities in the Krycklan catchment.

description: A path analysis of direct and indirect effect of GW, soil pH, and C/N, stream size and stream type on species richness of riparian plant communities in the Krycklan catchment.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558732.v1
title: Appendix C. A path analysis of direct and indirect effect of GW, soil pH, and C/N, stream size and stream type on species richness of riparian plant communities in the Krycklan catchment.

description: A path analysis of direct and indirect effect of GW, soil pH, and C/N, stream size and stream type on species richness of riparian plant communities in the Krycklan catchment.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558726
title: Appendix D. A summary table of differences in environmental variables between sediment and till-dominated streams.

description: A summary table of differences in environmental variables between sediment and till-dominated streams.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558726.v1
title: Appendix D. A summary table of differences in environmental variables between sediment and till-dominated streams.

description: A summary table of differences in environmental variables between sediment and till-dominated streams.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558723
title: Appendix A. Statistical table on the impact of distance from source and genotype on infection dynamics in a wind tunnel experiment.

description: Statistical table on the impact of distance from source and genotype on infection dynamics in a wind tunnel experiment.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558723.v1
title: Appendix A. Statistical table on the impact of distance from source and genotype on infection dynamics in a wind tunnel experiment.

description: Statistical table on the impact of distance from source and genotype on infection dynamics in a wind tunnel experiment.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558720
title: Appendix B. Statistical table on the impact of spore group size and genotype on infection dynamics.

description: Statistical table on the impact of spore group size and genotype on infection dynamics.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558720.v1
title: Appendix B. Statistical table on the impact of spore group size and genotype on infection dynamics.

description: Statistical table on the impact of spore group size and genotype on infection dynamics.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558717
title: Appendix A. Fixed demographic parameters used in the matrix population models for devils, thylacines, and dingoes.

description: Fixed demographic parameters used in the matrix population models for devils, thylacines, and dingoes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558717.v1
title: Appendix A. Fixed demographic parameters used in the matrix population models for devils, thylacines, and dingoes.

description: Fixed demographic parameters used in the matrix population models for devils, thylacines, and dingoes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558714
title: Appendix B. Evaluation of candidate boosted regression tree models fitted to the simulation output.

description: Evaluation of candidate boosted regression tree models fitted to the simulation output.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558714.v1
title: Appendix B. Evaluation of candidate boosted regression tree models fitted to the simulation output.

description: Evaluation of candidate boosted regression tree models fitted to the simulation output.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558711
title: Supplement 1. R script files to run the multispecies simulations in parallel, and two data files containing monthly rainfall records for Medindee, New South Wales, Australia (with and without El Niño events).

description: File List 00. Control.r (MD5: 81cb61a318164524ec614c6f307e3203) 01. Holocene.r (MD5: ac731ea765588a12a6125151e7026a46) 02. Mrufus.r (MD5: 9b821ba5bc6bac9ee3cd4fe4e5c90101) 03. Tcyno.r (MD5: 649b7174f6eb95c8e74f91d50cd374a9) 04. Sharris.r (MD5: 8b1ef29fd2af7b9ebcd588f191214311) 05. Clupus.r (MD5: 80575e0ebe1e97187f563512aa986632) Medindee Rainfall from BOM no El Nino.csv (MD5: b13cefaa9360d1d66409655fd417a698) Medindee Rainfall from BOM.csv (MD5: 0cc9383ba145c531cef0dc7f69165ada) Description The supplements provide the full R code to run the multi-species simulation models, as well as two data files containing monthly rainfall records for Medindee, NSW (with and without El Niño events). The latter two files are read into memory and used to create rainfall distributions for 5.5 ka and, for simulations including climate change, for the current day. Further details are provided below, and in comments throughout the R code. -- TABLE: Please see in attached file. --
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558708
title: Appendix A. Table showing the treatment effects on soil moisture and nutrients.

description: Table showing the treatment effects on soil moisture and nutrients.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3558708.v1
title: Appendix A. Table showing the treatment effects on soil moisture and nutrients.

description: Table showing the treatment effects on soil moisture and nutrients.