cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1096216.v2
title: Protocol Knowledge Representation

description: KR
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1095832
title: ODIN 01 Christchurch May 2014

description: Data from the Outdoor Dust Information Node (ODIN) deployed in Christchurch (New Zealand) between 2014-05-15 and 2014-06-03. <strong>Site details:</strong> Location (lat,lon): (-43.511236,172.633695)<br>Name: Coles Place (St. Albans)<br>Maintainer: Environment Canterbury (www.ecan.govt.nz) <strong>Data details:</strong> <strong>Headers:</strong> Date - %Y/%m/%d (R strptime format)<br>Time - %H:%M:%S (R strptime format)<br>Dust - Raw sensor output (mV)<br>Humidity - Instrument internal RH (%)<br>Temperature - Instrument internal temperature (C)<br>Battery - Battery voltage indicator (1024 = 5V) <strong>Data QA:</strong> The data comes directly from the sensor and therefore missing records should be expected.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1096073.v1
title: multi brain network imaging data

description: please use winrar to decompress the files
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1096218.v3
title: Multi-Scale Multi-Window our last word on stereovision

description: 03/07/2014 - "RTS Rencontre de Technologies Spatiales: Extraction d'informations des images" at Presentation : Multi-Scale Multi-Window "our last" word on stereovision . CNES - Toulouse.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1094881
title: phantom acupuncture project dataset

description: baseline information in excel file, acupuncture sensation and physiological data (heart rate, HR; skin conductance, SC; pupil size, PS) in text files
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1094881.v1
title: phantom acupuncture project dataset

description: baseline information in excel file, acupuncture sensation and physiological data (heart rate, HR; skin conductance, SC; pupil size, PS) in text files
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1096216.v3
title: Protocol Knowledge Representation

description: KR
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1095832.v1
title: ODIN 01 Christchurch May 2014

description: Data from the Outdoor Dust Information Node (ODIN) deployed in Christchurch (New Zealand) between 2014-05-15 and 2014-06-03. <strong>Site details:</strong> Location (lat,lon): (-43.511236,172.633695)<br>Name: Coles Place (St. Albans)<br>Maintainer: Environment Canterbury (www.ecan.govt.nz) <strong>Data details:</strong> <strong>Headers:</strong> Date - %Y/%m/%d (R strptime format)<br>Time - %H:%M:%S (R strptime format)<br>Dust - Raw sensor output (mV)<br>Humidity - Instrument internal RH (%)<br>Temperature - Instrument internal temperature (C)<br>Battery - Battery voltage indicator (1024 = 5V) <strong>Data QA:</strong> The data comes directly from the sensor and therefore missing records should be expected.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1096216.v4
title: Protocol Knowledge Representation

description: KR
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1094863.v1
title: The Impact of Billboards on Driver Visual Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review

description: ABSTRACT<b>Objective:</b> External distraction appears to affect at least 6-9% of distraction-affected motor vehicle collisions. Billboards may be good models for studying external distraction in general, and it is also desirable to understand billboard-related distraction per se. However, there has not yet been a clear consensus on the scope of billboard-related distraction or its dynamics with respect to characteristics of drivers, billboards, traffic, and the roadway. To narrow these knowledge gaps, a systematic literature review was conducted on billboard-related changes in driver visual behavior.<b>Methods:</b> A systematic literature search yielded 443 results, of which 8 studies met all inclusion criteria. Five studies meeting all inclusion criteria were later identified and added. Results were analyzed in terms of four categories of visual behavior: 1) gaze variability (GV), glance pattern activity (GPA), and percentage of time spent glancing at the forward roadway; 2) glances at unexpected drive-relevant stimuli; 3) glances at expected drive-relevant stimuli; and 4) glances at billboards.<b>Results:</b> There was considerable evidence that about 10-20% of all glances at billboards were ≥ 0.75 seconds, that active billboards drew more glances and more long glances (≥ 0.75 seconds, ≥ 2.0 seconds) than passive billboards but did not attract a longer average glance, and that there was large variability among individual billboards within categories (e.g., active vs. passive). The extent to which billboards attracted glances ≥ 2.0 seconds was uncertain. There was tentative evidence that billboards did not affect GPA, glances at expected drive-relevant stimuli, or the proportion of time drivers spent glancing at the forward roadway, and that they did affect vertical GV and glances at unexpected drive-relevant stimuli.<b>Conclusions:</b> Generally, billboard-related distraction appeared to be minor and regulated by drivers as the demands of the driving task changed. However, this review's findings suggest that may not be true in all cases. Future research should emphasize the “tails of the distribution” in addition to average cases, both in terms of the analysis of visual behavior and the complexity of driving tasks. Further research is also needed to understand the effects of billboard design, driver characteristics, and road and traffic context.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1096216.v5
title: Protocol Knowledge Representation

description: KR
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1094863
title: The Impact of Billboards on Driver Visual Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review

description: <b>Objective:</b> External distraction appears to affect at least 6–9% of distraction-affected motor vehicle collisions. Billboards may be good models for studying external distraction in general, and it is also desirable to understand billboard-related distraction per se. However, there has not yet been a clear consensus on the scope of billboard-related distraction or its dynamics with respect to characteristics of drivers, billboards, traffic, and the roadway. To narrow these knowledge gaps, a systematic literature review was conducted on billboard-related changes in driver visual behavior. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic literature search yielded 443 results, of which 8 studies met all inclusion criteria. Five studies meeting all inclusion criteria were later identified and added. Results were analyzed in terms of 4 categories of visual behavior: (1) gaze variability (GV), glance pattern activity (GPA), and percentage of time spent glancing at the forward roadway; (2) glances at unexpected drive-relevant stimuli; (3) glances at expected drive-relevant stimuli; and (4) glances at billboards. <b>Results:</b> There was considerable evidence that about 10–20% of all glances at billboards were ≥0.75 s, that active billboards drew more glances and more long glances (≥0.75 s, ≥2.0 s) than passive billboards but did not attract a longer average glance, and that there was large variability among individual billboards within categories (e.g., active vs. passive). The extent to which billboards attracted glances ≥ 2.0 s was uncertain. There was tentative evidence that billboards did not affect GPA, glances at expected drive-relevant stimuli, or the proportion of time drivers spent glancing at the forward roadway and that they did affect vertical GV and glances at unexpected drive-relevant stimuli. <b>Conclusions:</b> Generally, billboard-related distraction appeared to be minor and regulated by drivers as the demands of the driving task changed. However, this review's findings suggest that this may not be true in all cases. Future research should emphasize the tails of the distribution in addition to average cases, in terms of both the analysis of visual behavior and the complexity of driving tasks. Further research is also needed to understand the effects of billboard design, driver characteristics, and road and traffic context.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1094863.v3
title: The Impact of Billboards on Driver Visual Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review

description: <b>Objective:</b> External distraction appears to affect at least 6–9% of distraction-affected motor vehicle collisions. Billboards may be good models for studying external distraction in general, and it is also desirable to understand billboard-related distraction per se. However, there has not yet been a clear consensus on the scope of billboard-related distraction or its dynamics with respect to characteristics of drivers, billboards, traffic, and the roadway. To narrow these knowledge gaps, a systematic literature review was conducted on billboard-related changes in driver visual behavior. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic literature search yielded 443 results, of which 8 studies met all inclusion criteria. Five studies meeting all inclusion criteria were later identified and added. Results were analyzed in terms of 4 categories of visual behavior: (1) gaze variability (GV), glance pattern activity (GPA), and percentage of time spent glancing at the forward roadway; (2) glances at unexpected drive-relevant stimuli; (3) glances at expected drive-relevant stimuli; and (4) glances at billboards. <b>Results:</b> There was considerable evidence that about 10–20% of all glances at billboards were ≥0.75 s, that active billboards drew more glances and more long glances (≥0.75 s, ≥2.0 s) than passive billboards but did not attract a longer average glance, and that there was large variability among individual billboards within categories (e.g., active vs. passive). The extent to which billboards attracted glances ≥ 2.0 s was uncertain. There was tentative evidence that billboards did not affect GPA, glances at expected drive-relevant stimuli, or the proportion of time drivers spent glancing at the forward roadway and that they did affect vertical GV and glances at unexpected drive-relevant stimuli. <b>Conclusions:</b> Generally, billboard-related distraction appeared to be minor and regulated by drivers as the demands of the driving task changed. However, this review's findings suggest that this may not be true in all cases. Future research should emphasize the tails of the distribution in addition to average cases, in terms of both the analysis of visual behavior and the complexity of driving tasks. Further research is also needed to understand the effects of billboard design, driver characteristics, and road and traffic context.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1096216.v6
title: Protocol Knowledge Representation

description: KR
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1094863.v2
title: The Impact of Billboards on Driver Visual Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review

description: <b>Objective:</b> External distraction appears to affect at least 6–9% of distraction-affected motor vehicle collisions. Billboards may be good models for studying external distraction in general, and it is also desirable to understand billboard-related distraction per se. However, there has not yet been a clear consensus on the scope of billboard-related distraction or its dynamics with respect to characteristics of drivers, billboards, traffic, and the roadway. To narrow these knowledge gaps, a systematic literature review was conducted on billboard-related changes in driver visual behavior.<b>Methods:</b> A systematic literature search yielded 443 results, of which 8 studies met all inclusion criteria. Five studies meeting all inclusion criteria were later identified and added. Results were analyzed in terms of 4 categories of visual behavior: (1) gaze variability (GV), glance pattern activity (GPA), and percentage of time spent glancing at the forward roadway; (2) glances at unexpected drive-relevant stimuli; (3) glances at expected drive-relevant stimuli; and (4) glances at billboards.<b>Results:</b> There was considerable evidence that about 10–20% of all glances at billboards were ≥0.75 s, that active billboards drew more glances and more long glances (≥0.75 s, ≥2.0 s) than passive billboards but did not attract a longer average glance, and that there was large variability among individual billboards within categories (e.g., active vs. passive). The extent to which billboards attracted glances ≥ 2.0 s was uncertain. There was tentative evidence that billboards did not affect GPA, glances at expected drive-relevant stimuli, or the proportion of time drivers spent glancing at the forward roadway and that they did affect vertical GV and glances at unexpected drive-relevant stimuli.<b>Conclusions:</b> Generally, billboard-related distraction appeared to be minor and regulated by drivers as the demands of the driving task changed. However, this review's findings suggest that this may not be true in all cases. Future research should emphasize the tails of the distribution in addition to average cases, in terms of both the analysis of visual behavior and the complexity of driving tasks. Further research is also needed to understand the effects of billboard design, driver characteristics, and road and traffic context.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1094852
title: 15-Well Vial Holder

description: .STL file for 3D printing Custom Labware design: SBS-format vial holder for automation or liquid-handling systems. Designed by Julie Behr, CBM graduate student, during mini-rotation in Chodera lab, MSKCC. Designed for: FISHERBRAND VIAL, SCREW THREAD21X70MM, 4 DR03-339-21F Vial, Sample; Fisherbrand; Type I, Class B clear borosilicate glass; Closure: Black phenolic screw cap; Liner: Polyvinyl-faced pulp; GPI thread finish: 18-400; Capacity: 4 dr. (14.8mL); O.D. x L: 21 x 70mm
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1096216.v7
title: Protocol Knowledge Representation

description: KR
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1094841
title: 96-Well Paper Microzone Plate Holder

description: .STL file for 3D printing Custom Labware design: SBS-format carrier for patterned paper, for use with 96-well paper microzone plates. Designed by Julie Behr, CBM graduate student, during mini-rotation in Chodera lab, MSKCC. Square-well plate suitable for top and bottom reads with tall wells ensuring light separation on either side of paper slot
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1094862.v1
title: The effects of cyclists present at rural intersections on speed behaviour and workload of car drivers: a driving simulator study

description: ABSTRACT<b>Objective:</b> The objective was to gain insight in how the number of cyclists, the cyclist's approach direction and the cyclist's action affect speed and mental workload of drivers approaching rural intersections. Also, the effects of a speed-reducing measure on the interaction between cyclists and motorised traffic was examined.<b>Methods:</b> An experiment was conducted in a moving-base driving simulator. Thirty participants completed three runs each in three conditions: a baseline, a plateau and a chicane condition. Participants drove an 80 km/h rural distributor road with eight intersections. Eight cyclist scenarios were developed varying in the number of cyclists and the direction from which they approached the participants’ lane. The Peripheral Detection Task was used to measure workload objectively and continuously.<b>Results:</b> A plateau ahead of the intersection resulted in drivers entering the bicycle crossing with lower driving speeds but did not result in less serious potential conflicts compared to intersections without speed-reducing measure. With respect to the presence of cyclists, drivers approaching the intersection without cyclists reached a minimum speed at a larger distance to the bicycle crossing compared to approaching the intersection with multiple cyclists in the baseline condition. At intersections with plateaus, drivers drove slower when encountering multiple cyclists compared to no cyclists. At intersections without speed-reducing measure, drivers drove slower, decelerated stronger and decelerated at a shorter distance to the bicycle crossing when encountering the suddenly crossing cyclist compared to the yielding cyclist.<b>Conclusions:</b> Although having right of way at rural intersections, drivers’ speed behaviour was affected by the number and action of cyclists. From a road safety point of view, driving speeds at rural intersections need to be further reduced to limit the seriousness of potential conflicts between cyclists and motorised traffic.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1094862
title: The Effects of Cyclists Present at Rural Intersections on Speed Behavior and Workload of Car Drivers: A Driving Simulator Study

description: <b>Objective:</b> The objective was to gain insight into how the number of cyclists, the cyclist's approach direction, and the cyclist's action affect the speed and mental workload of drivers approaching rural intersections. In addition, the effects of a speed-reducing measure on the interaction between cyclists and motorized traffic were examined. <b>Methods:</b> An experiment was conducted in a moving-base driving simulator. Thirty participants completed 3 runs each in 3 conditions: a baseline, a plateau, and a chicane condition. Participants drove an 80 km/h rural distributor road with 8 intersections. Eight cyclist scenarios were developed varying in the number of cyclists and the direction from which they approached the participants’ lane. The Peripheral Detection Task was used to measure workload objectively and continuously. <b>Results:</b> A plateau ahead of the intersection resulted in drivers entering the bicycle crossing with lower driving speeds but did not result in less serious potential conflicts compared to intersections without the speed-reducing measure. With respect to the presence of cyclists, drivers approaching the intersection without cyclists reached a minimum speed at a greater distance from the bicycle crossing compared to approaching the intersection with multiple cyclists in the baseline condition. At intersections with plateaus, drivers drove slower when encountering multiple cyclists compared to no cyclists. At intersections without the speed-reducing measure, drivers drove slower, decelerated stronger, and decelerated at a shorter distance to the bicycle crossing when encountering a suddenly crossing cyclist compared to a yielding cyclist. <b>Conclusions:</b> Although drivers have the right of way at rural intersections, drivers’ speed behavior was affected by the number and action of cyclists. From a road safety point of view, driving speeds at rural intersections need to be further reduced to limit the seriousness of potential conflicts between cyclists and motorized traffic.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1094862.v2
title: The Effects of Cyclists Present at Rural Intersections on Speed Behavior and Workload of Car Drivers: A Driving Simulator Study

description: <b>Objective:</b> The objective was to gain insight into how the number of cyclists, the cyclist's approach direction, and the cyclist's action affect the speed and mental workload of drivers approaching rural intersections. In addition, the effects of a speed-reducing measure on the interaction between cyclists and motorized traffic were examined.<b>Methods:</b> An experiment was conducted in a moving-base driving simulator. Thirty participants completed 3 runs each in 3 conditions: a baseline, a plateau, and a chicane condition. Participants drove an 80 km/h rural distributor road with 8 intersections. Eight cyclist scenarios were developed varying in the number of cyclists and the direction from which they approached the participants’ lane. The Peripheral Detection Task was used to measure workload objectively and continuously.<b>Results:</b> A plateau ahead of the intersection resulted in drivers entering the bicycle crossing with lower driving speeds but did not result in less serious potential conflicts compared to intersections without the speed-reducing measure. With respect to the presence of cyclists, drivers approaching the intersection without cyclists reached a minimum speed at a greater distance from the bicycle crossing compared to approaching the intersection with multiple cyclists in the baseline condition. At intersections with plateaus, drivers drove slower when encountering multiple cyclists compared to no cyclists. At intersections without the speed-reducing measure, drivers drove slower, decelerated stronger, and decelerated at a shorter distance to the bicycle crossing when encountering a suddenly crossing cyclist compared to a yielding cyclist.<b>Conclusions:</b> Although drivers have the right of way at rural intersections, drivers’ speed behavior was affected by the number and action of cyclists. From a road safety point of view, driving speeds at rural intersections need to be further reduced to limit the seriousness of potential conflicts between cyclists and motorized traffic.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1094862.v3
title: The Effects of Cyclists Present at Rural Intersections on Speed Behavior and Workload of Car Drivers: A Driving Simulator Study

description: <b>Objective:</b> The objective was to gain insight into how the number of cyclists, the cyclist's approach direction, and the cyclist's action affect the speed and mental workload of drivers approaching rural intersections. In addition, the effects of a speed-reducing measure on the interaction between cyclists and motorized traffic were examined. <b>Methods:</b> An experiment was conducted in a moving-base driving simulator. Thirty participants completed 3 runs each in 3 conditions: a baseline, a plateau, and a chicane condition. Participants drove an 80 km/h rural distributor road with 8 intersections. Eight cyclist scenarios were developed varying in the number of cyclists and the direction from which they approached the participants’ lane. The Peripheral Detection Task was used to measure workload objectively and continuously. <b>Results:</b> A plateau ahead of the intersection resulted in drivers entering the bicycle crossing with lower driving speeds but did not result in less serious potential conflicts compared to intersections without the speed-reducing measure. With respect to the presence of cyclists, drivers approaching the intersection without cyclists reached a minimum speed at a greater distance from the bicycle crossing compared to approaching the intersection with multiple cyclists in the baseline condition. At intersections with plateaus, drivers drove slower when encountering multiple cyclists compared to no cyclists. At intersections without the speed-reducing measure, drivers drove slower, decelerated stronger, and decelerated at a shorter distance to the bicycle crossing when encountering a suddenly crossing cyclist compared to a yielding cyclist. <b>Conclusions:</b> Although drivers have the right of way at rural intersections, drivers’ speed behavior was affected by the number and action of cyclists. From a road safety point of view, driving speeds at rural intersections need to be further reduced to limit the seriousness of potential conflicts between cyclists and motorized traffic.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1094784
title: R scripts and data for SIBER analysis of Benthic trophic interactions and glacier retreat

description: R scripts for SIBER analysis and Graphs These are the R and Rmd (R markdown) scripts used in the paper: Pasotti F, Saravia LA, De Troch M, Tarantelli MS, Sahade R, Vanreusel A. <strong>Benthic trophic interactions in an Antarctic shallow water ecosystem affected by recent glacier retreat</strong>. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0141742. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0141742 <strong>Description of main files:</strong> Siber.Rmd: R markdown file used for the analysis and figures of the complete original data. Siber_wout_MT2-poly.Rmd: Small modifications to analyze a data set without some outliers of the same data. Pasotti.dat: original data used in the analysis <strong>Accesory files:</strong> BUGS_models.r/SEA_fitting.r: updated functions for SIBER analysis not included in the package Test simul_ln_iso_data.r: generation of simulated data pasottiSim.dat: Simulated data Siber_w_sim_data.Rmd: sligtly modified R script to run with simulated data
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1094681
title: new fileset4

description: scipy
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1094681.v1
title: new fileset4

description: scipy