cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21080659.v1
title: Supplementary Material for: Care4AD: A Technology-Driven Platform for Care Coordination and Management: Acceptability Study in Dementia

description: <b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The technology-driven solution can reduce the caregiving burden; however, the needs of dementia caregiving are unique, and attitudes towards adopting technology from the perspectives of all the stakeholders involved in dementia caregiving are unclear. This study aims to assess the acceptability and feasibility of a technology-driven platform to facilitate care coordination platform, Care4AD, from the end-user perspective. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Care4AD includes three components: (1) Care4AD app: the app is used by caregivers to coordinate care, monitor physical activity, and schedule reminders; (2) Care4AD tablet: a smart tablet is used by the care recipient to display scheduled reminders; and (3) Care4AD tags: a series of wireless sensor tags attached to various objects of daily care to facilitate monitoring instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and adherence to scheduled tasks. Stakeholders in caregiving, including 11 experts in dementia care (age: 53.3 ± 8, 73% female), 10 individuals with dementia (IWD) (age: 76.1 ± 7.3, 50% female), and 14 caregivers (age: 66.9 ± 10.6, 75% female) were interviewed to determine perceived ease of use, attitude towards use, and perceived usefulness, based on the technology acceptance model (TAM) questionnaire. Additionally, we assessed technology anxiety and concerns with data sharing by caregivers and IWD. The interviews were conducted through videoconferencing or in-person meetings. The interview was composed of open-ended questions, a demonstration of the proposed Care4AD platform, and a survey based on TAM. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Compared to the neutral response, stakeholders showed significantly higher acceptance (70–100% satisfied to highly satisfied, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) for all components of the TAM. Among IWD, age (<i>r</i> = −0.68, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and for caregivers the perceived ease of use (<i>r</i> = 0.73, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) were significant predictors of attitude towards using the technology. Interestingly, neither concerns about data sharing nor educational level were limiting factors in the acceptability of the system in our sample. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Overall, the results support a high perception of usefulness, ease of use, and attitude towards using Care4AD. The key barriers to adopting such technology are the age of IWD and the caregiver’s perception of ease of use. Future studies are warranted to explore the effectiveness of such a platform to reduce caregiver stress and improve the quality of life and independence of IWD.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21080524.v1
title: Supplementary Material for: Cerebellar Cortex Stimulation for Acquired Dystonia: A Case Report and Review of Its Role in Modern Surgical Practice

description: <b><i>Background:</i></b> Cerebral palsy (CP) is a common cause of acquired dystonia, which can lead to significant interference with quality of life and societal participation. In the last two decades, the surgical treatment of dystonia has primarily focused on deep brain stimulation targeting the basal ganglia and thalamic circuits. However, stimulation of the basal ganglia has generally been less effective in acquired combined forms of dystonia, including dystonic CP. These limitations, along with growing evidence for the role of the cerebellum in the pathophysiology of dystonia, have led to renewed interest in the cerebellum as a target for therapeutic stimulation in dystonia. Nevertheless, there are very few contemporary studies demonstrating its use. We present the case of a patient with generalized dystonia due to dyskinetic CP who was successfully treated with stimulation of the cerebellar cortex in the modern era. We also review the evidence underpinning targeting of the cerebellum in surgical therapy for dystonia and examine the latest reports of this approach in the surgical literature. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> The patient derived significant improvement in the control of her dystonic symptoms, with a reduction in her BFMDRS score from 83 to 25. No complications were observed during more than 3 years of postoperative follow-up. Since the turn of the 21st century, there have been only 7 reports of cerebellar stimulation for dystonia, recruiting a total of 18 patients. These studies have exclusively targeted deep brain structures, making the present report of cortical cerebellar stimulation particularly unique. <b><i>Key Messages:</i></b> In the 21st century, cerebellar stimulation has predominantly been a second-line treatment for dystonia, after the failure of DBS targeting more mainstream loci within the thalamus and globus pallidus. However, there is increasing recognition of the role of the cerebellum in movement disorders, with multiple convergent lines of evidence supporting its involvement in dystonia pathophysiology. The cerebellum is worthy of greater consideration as a target for neurostimulation in dystonia, particularly in cases of acquired etiology.
DOI: 10.5258/soton/d2322
title: Mathematica notebook for the publication, "Cross-correlation effects in the solution NMR spectra of near-equivalent spin-1/2 pairs"

description: Mathematica notebook implementing the theoretical model in the paper, "Cross-correlation effects in the solution NMR spectra of near-equivalent spin-1/2 pairs". published in the Journal of Chemical Physics
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7068678
title: Supplementary data for "Land tenure drives Brazil's deforestation rates across socio-environmental contexts"

description: File name: Supplementary Data 1 Description: Pre-processed data that contain all the information required to run the statistical analyses that produce our final results. This includes information on the land parcel identification number corresponding to the Imaflora dataset (gid), the covariates, and forest conversion to agriculture for the respective temporal scale. Note, each spatiotemporal scale and tenure regime comparison should be derived from the column “stScale”. File name: Supplementary Data 2 Description: Full regression results reporting estimated effects each spatial-temporal scale considered, compared against both an undesignated/untitled public lands and private lands counterfactual. Average Marginal Effects (AME) are reported for each specific compared tenure regime at different spatial and temporal scales (“stScale”), with recorded number of observations in matched sample (n_pop), the standard error (SE), p-value, and lower and upper confidence intervals. File name: Supplementary Data 3 Description: Rosenbaum bounds reporting upper and lower bounds for both Hodges-Lehmann estimates and p-values at each spatial-temporal scale considered. For more information on this study please see: see https://doi.org/10.31223/X5D31J and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7062285
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7068677
title: Supplementary data for "Land tenure drives Brazil's deforestation rates across socio-environmental contexts"

description: File name: Supplementary Data 1 Description: Pre-processed data that contain all the information required to run the statistical analyses that produce our final results. This includes information on the land parcel identification number corresponding to the Imaflora dataset (gid), the covariates, and forest conversion to agriculture for the respective temporal scale. Note, each spatiotemporal scale and tenure regime comparison should be derived from the column “stScale”. File name: Supplementary Data 2 Description: Full regression results reporting estimated effects each spatial-temporal scale considered, compared against both an undesignated/untitled public lands and private lands counterfactual. Average Marginal Effects (AME) are reported for each specific compared tenure regime at different spatial and temporal scales (“stScale”), with recorded number of observations in matched sample (n_pop), the standard error (SE), p-value, and lower and upper confidence intervals. File name: Supplementary Data 3 Description: Rosenbaum bounds reporting upper and lower bounds for both Hodges-Lehmann estimates and p-values at each spatial-temporal scale considered. For more information on this study please see: see https://doi.org/10.31223/X5D31J and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7062285
DOI: 10.23729/06b97017-aba3-43f0-a445-6aca4ab02e79
title: BatTrace Cores

description: Drillcore samples imaged for the BATTRACE (https://www.gtk.fi/tutkimusprojekti/battrace-sustainable-processing-and-traceability-of-battery-metals-minerals-and-materials/) project. The samples were obtained from Mawson Gold (Rajapalot Gold-Cobalt project) and the main purpose of the scans was to determine the micro-structural evolution of Au and Co inside the samples. Preview dataset found at https://doi.org/10.23729/d6eddf6d-adff-4291-98ac-9d2d8945c126 . To obtain data, please contact fairdata-pas@gtk.fi .
DOI: 10.17632/87btvznknv.1
title: LINF_320023300

description: protein of unknown function - conserved
Leishmania infantum (strain JPCM5)
DOI: 10.17632/g3pxrvm27t.1
title: LINF_320023200

description: pumilio protein 7 | PUF7
Leishmania infantum (strain JPCM5)
DOI: 10.17632/n2cd8ht2cf.1
title: LINF_320023000

description: coatomer subunit epsilon
Leishmania infantum (strain JPCM5)
DOI: 10.17632/s8bfddcxrg.1
title: LINF_320023400

description: mitoribosomal protein mL38
Leishmania infantum (strain JPCM5)
DOI: 10.17632/5n9xxvt6h2.1
title: Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic- Versus Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Ovarian Cystectomy for Ovarian Mature Cystic Teratoma: A Randomized Controlled Trial

description: Ovarian cystectomy of OMCT through vNOTES
DOI: 10.17632/ps88zt2ft7.1
title: Cryptosporidium and Cryptosporidiosis among humans in Egypt

description: However, there has been progress in Cryptosporidium research in Egypt, available data on the epidemiology and diversity of this parasite among humans are rather fragmentary. The present study provides a review of the published data on Cryptosporidiosis infecting humans in Egypt, which should be useful for interpreting the epidemiology of this ubiquitous parasite. This data evadite the increasing risk of infections among the Egyptian population and there is an urgent need for disease control.
DOI: 10.17632/ps88zt2ft7.2
title: Cryptosporidium and Cryptosporidiosis among humans in Egypt

description: However, there has been progress in Cryptosporidium research in Egypt, available data on the epidemiology and diversity of this parasite among humans are rather fragmentary. The present data provide a review of the published data on Cryptosporidiosis infecting humans in Egypt, which should be useful for interpreting the epidemiology of this ubiquitous parasite. This data evadite the increasing risk of infections among the Egyptian population and there is an urgent need for disease control.
DOI: 10.17632/zrtfry5fsd.3
title: Project: Preprint Observatory

description: Experiments with faster dissemination of research began in the 1960s, and in the 1990s first preprint servers emerged and became widely used in Physical Sciences and Economics. Since 2010, more than 30 new preprint servers have emerged and the number of deposited preprints has grown exponentially, with numerous journals now supporting posting of preprints and accepting preprints as submissions for journal peer review and publication. Research on preprints is, however, still scarce. The goals of this project are: 1) Study preprint policies, submission requirements and addressing of transparency in reporting and research integrity topics of all know preprint servers that allow deposit of preprints to researchers regardless of their institutional affiliation or funding. 2) Study comments deposited on preprint servers’ platforms and social media and their relation to peer review and information exchange. 3) Study differences between preprint version(s) and version of record. Team Members (by first name alphabetical order): Ana Jerončić,1 Gerben ter Riet,2,3 IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg,4 John P.A. Ioannidis,5-9 Joseph Costello,10 Juan Pablo Alperin,11,12 Lauren A. Maggio,10 Lex Bouter,13,14 Mario Malički,5 Steve Goodman5-7 1 Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia 2 Urban Vitality Centre of Expertise, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 3 Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 4 Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 5 Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA 6 Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA 7 Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA 8 Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA 9 Department of Statistics, Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford, California, USA 10 Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA 11 Scholarly Communications Lab, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 12 School of Publishing, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 13 Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 14 Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
DOI: 10.17632/zrtfry5fsd.4
title: Project: Preprint Observatory

description: Experiments with faster dissemination of research began in the 1960s, and in the 1990s first preprint servers emerged and became widely used in Physical Sciences and Economics. Since 2010, more than 30 new preprint servers have emerged and the number of deposited preprints has grown exponentially, with numerous journals now supporting posting of preprints and accepting preprints as submissions for journal peer review and publication. Research on preprints is, however, still scarce. The goals of this project are: 1) Study preprint policies, submission requirements and addressing of transparency in reporting and research integrity topics of all know preprint servers that allow deposit of preprints to researchers regardless of their institutional affiliation or funding. 2) Study comments deposited on preprint servers’ platforms and social media and their relation to peer review and information exchange. 3) Study differences between preprint version(s) and version of record. Team Members (by first name alphabetical order): Ana Jerončić,1 Gerben ter Riet,2,3 IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg,4 John P.A. Ioannidis,5-9 Joseph Costello,10 Juan Pablo Alperin,11,12 Lauren A. Maggio,10 Lex Bouter,13,14 Mario Malički,5 Steve Goodman5-7 1 Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia 2 Urban Vitality Centre of Expertise, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 3 Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 4 Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 5 Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA 6 Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA 7 Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA 8 Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA 9 Department of Statistics, Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford, California, USA 10 Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA 11 Scholarly Communications Lab, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 12 School of Publishing, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 13 Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 14 Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
DOI: 10.17632/zrtfry5fsd.1
title: Project: Preprint Observatory

description: Experiments with faster dissemination of research began in the 1960s, and in the 1990s first preprint servers emerged and became widely used in Physical Sciences and Economics. Since 2010, more than 30 new preprint servers have emerged and the number of deposited preprints has grown exponentially, with numerous journals now supporting posting of preprints and accepting preprints as submissions for journal peer review and publication. Research on preprints is, however, still scarce. The goals of this project are: 1) Study preprint policies, submission requirements and addressing of transparency in reporting and research integrity topics of all know preprint servers that allow deposit of preprints to researchers regardless of their institutional affiliation or funding. 2) Study comments deposited on preprint servers’ platforms and social media and their relation to peer review and information exchange. 3) Study differences between preprint version(s) and version of record. Team Members (by first name alphabetical order): Ana Jerončić,1 Gerben ter Riet,2,3 IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg,4 John P.A. Ioannidis,5-9 Joseph Costello,10 Juan Pablo Alperin,11,12 Lauren A. Maggio,10 Lex Bouter,13,14 Mario Malički,5 Steve Goodman5-7 1 Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia 2 Urban Vitality Centre of Expertise, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 3 Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 4 Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 5 Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA 6 Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA 7 Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA 8 Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA 9 Department of Statistics, Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford, California, USA 10 Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA 11 Scholarly Communications Lab, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 12 School of Publishing, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 13 Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 14 Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
DOI: 10.17632/zrtfry5fsd.2
title: Project: Preprint Observatory

description: Experiments with faster dissemination of research began in the 1960s, and in the 1990s first preprint servers emerged and became widely used in Physical Sciences and Economics. Since 2010, more than 30 new preprint servers have emerged and the number of deposited preprints has grown exponentially, with numerous journals now supporting posting of preprints and accepting preprints as submissions for journal peer review and publication. Research on preprints is, however, still scarce. The goals of this project are: 1) Study preprint policies, submission requirements and addressing of transparency in reporting and research integrity topics of all know preprint servers that allow deposit of preprints to researchers regardless of their institutional affiliation or funding. 2) Study comments deposited on preprint servers’ platforms and social media and their relation to peer review and information exchange. 3) Study differences between preprint version(s) and version of record. Team Members (by first name alphabetical order): Ana Jerončić,1 Gerben ter Riet,2,3 IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg,4 John P.A. Ioannidis,5-9 Joseph Costello,10 Juan Pablo Alperin,11,12 Lauren A. Maggio,10 Lex Bouter,13,14 Mario Malički,5 Steve Goodman5-7 1 Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia 2 Urban Vitality Centre of Expertise, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 3 Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 4 Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 5 Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA 6 Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA 7 Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA 8 Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA 9 Department of Statistics, Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford, California, USA 10 Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA 11 Scholarly Communications Lab, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 12 School of Publishing, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 13 Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 14 Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
DOI: 10.17632/zrtfry5fsd.5
title: Project: Preprint Observatory

description: Experiments with faster dissemination of research began in the 1960s, and in the 1990s first preprint servers emerged and became widely used in Physical Sciences and Economics. Since 2010, more than 30 new preprint servers have emerged and the number of deposited preprints has grown exponentially, with numerous journals now supporting posting of preprints and accepting preprints as submissions for journal peer review and publication. Research on preprints is, however, still scarce.

The goals of this project are:
1) Study preprint policies, submission requirements and addressing of transparency in reporting and research integrity topics of all know preprint servers that allow deposit of preprints to researchers regardless of their institutional affiliation or funding.    
2) Study comments deposited on preprint servers’ platforms and social media and their relation to peer review and information exchange. 
3) Study differences between preprint version(s) and version of record.
4) Living review of manuscript changes

Team Members (by first name alphabetical order):

Ana Jerončić,1 Gerben ter Riet,2,3 IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg,4 John P.A. Ioannidis,5-9 Joseph Costello,10 Juan Pablo Alperin,11,12 Lauren A. Maggio,10 Lex Bouter,13,14 Mario Malički,5 Steve Goodman5-7

1 Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
2 Urban Vitality Centre of Expertise, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3 Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
4 Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
5 Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA 
6 Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
7 Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
8 Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
9 Department of Statistics, Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford, California, USA
10 Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
11 Scholarly Communications Lab, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
12 School of Publishing, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
13 Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
14 Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands