cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/qbohg
title: Passed Acts; St. 1861, c.91, SC1/series 229, Petition of Seth Crowell

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: For the repeal of the personal liberty laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10668869"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10668869&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1861-01-22 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: South Dennis &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Alpheus Hardy, Norfolk; committee on the personal liberty laws &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Seth Crowell&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Obed Baker&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Joel Nickerson&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1861-05,1861-06 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the Senate in May, 1861 and referred to the committee on the personal liberty laws and received in the House in June, 1861 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 69 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 67 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 2 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: undersigned, [females], ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: not column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: St. 1861, c.91, passed March 25, 1861 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/vqx4ak
title: Supplementary data - The use of digital data analytics in the performance of advertising campaigns: the effect of absorptive capacity

description: Research data used in the paper entitled "The use of digital data analytics in the performance of advertising campaigns: the effect of absorptive capacity" published in Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (RBGN) V25, n3 (2023)

Acess: https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/1v8dfv
title: A98_9724.jpg

description: Link to OCHRE database: &lt;a href = 'http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/ed442128-d5ca-6b71-be4d-23bae008ddbd'&gt;http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/ed442128-d5ca-6b71-be4d-23bae008ddbd
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/by4obr
title: Replication Data for: Understanding Journalist Killings

description: Why do state authorities murder journalists? We show that the majority of journalists are killed in democracies and present an argument that focuses on institutional differences between democratic states. In democracies, journalists will most likely be targeted by local state authorities that have limited options to generally restrict press freedom. Where local governments are elected, negative reporting could mean that local politicians lose power and influence, especially if they are involved in corrupt practices. Analyzing new global data on journalist killings that identify the perpetrator and visibility of the journalist, we show that local-level elections carry an inherent risk, particularly for less visible journalists. Killings perpetrated by criminal groups follow a similar pattern to those by state authorities, pointing to possible connections between these groups. Our study shows that without effective monitoring and accountability, national democratic institutions alone are unable to effectively protect journalists from any perpetrator.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/1vabtt
title: A00_12868.JPG

description: Link to OCHRE database: &lt;a href = 'http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/13ebcf76-992c-3106-a9ff-c44b75788c29'&gt;http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/13ebcf76-992c-3106-a9ff-c44b75788c29
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/28960
title: Replication data for: Table 1 of "Dispersing Authority or Deepening Divisions? Decentralization and Ethnoregional Party Success"

description: Allows for replication of three models presented in Table 1: Cross-Sectional Time-Series-Forced Generalized Least Squares Models of the Share of the Vote Won by Regional Parties in National Elections in Italy, 1946–2008. Dependent variable is share of the vote won by regional parties in Italian National Elections. Key independent variable is whether the Italian region was decentralized at the time of the election.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/b3yh3t
title: Replication Data for: What draws politicians’ attention. An experimental study of issue framing effects on individual political elites.

description: These data allow to replicate the main findings of the article in Political Behavior
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/vqrmpk
title: Longitudinal Study of Moral Development, 1955-1977

description: This 20-year longitudinal study was undertaken to trace developmental changes in children's moral reasoning. Initial data collection (Time 0) was begun in 1955-1956, with interviews conducted every three to four years thereafter. Sixty of the 96 participants were interviewed at least twice. The original sample consisted of 72 boys selected from two Chicago suburbs. The group was equally divided among three age groups (10-, 13-, and 16-year-olds), two social classes (middle and working class), and those high and low in sociometric popularity. The first wave of data collection also included a comparison group of 12 delinquent boys. Twelve auxiliary participants were later added to the sample.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; All participants received the nine dilemmas of Kohlberg's moral judgment interview. Additional questions tapped independence of judgment, comprehension, identifications/exemplars, and moral ideals. Most of the interviews included questions on the ideal self, occupational aspirations, family background, and life experiences, as well as two Q-sorts: a Social Respect Sort, ranking the respect accorded to different occupational roles; and a Be-Like Sort, ranking how much the participant wanted to be like people in various personal and occupational roles.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Other measures, by wave, are as follows. Wave 1 (1956): socioeconomic status (Hollingshead), sociometric status (Moreno, 1944), IQ scores (Kuhler-Anderson text), roleplaying. Wave 2 (1960): teachers' ratings, parents' data (moral judgment interviews and measures of child rearing attitudes and practices). Wave 3 (1964): Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) stories. Wave 4 (1969): five-point scale of attitudes toward sex. Wave 5 (1973): occupational rating scale. Wave 6 (1977): cognitive
measures/formal operations problems, measures of interpersonal role-taking, job and family descriptions, life outcomes questionnaire. Waves 4, 5, 6: metaethical questions, reconstruction (interpretations of past responses and/or logical reconstructions of moral arguments), Loevinger Sentence Completion Test. Longitudinal data were collected only for the children (all boys) in the study.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; The Murray Research Archive holds original record paper data, and numeric file data from the study.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/1vnqv
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1858, Senate laid on the table, SC1/series 230, Petition of Josiah Hayward

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Removal of Edward Greeley Loring &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11029814"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11029814&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Salem &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Charles Howes, Essex; committee on probate and chancery &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Josiah Hayward&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;James H. Battis&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Joseph H. Fowler&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 38 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 38 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1858, laid on the table &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/b5rjw
title: Passed Acts; St. 1861, c.91, SC1/series 229, Petition of George Miles

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Against slave hunting &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10668831"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10668831&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Westminster &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Joseph W. Forbush, Westminster; committee on federal resolution &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;George Miles&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Benson Bigelow&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Lucinda Miles&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Lucy Bigelow&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1861-01-23,1861-01-24 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on January 23, 1861 and referred to the committee on federal resolution and laid on the table and received in the Senate on January 24, 1861 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 117 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 53 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 64 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, legal voters, other adults, [females], ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: St. 1861, c.91, passed March 25, 1861 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/bqfhnq
title: Is Capital Structure Irrelevant with ESG investors?

description: This data contain Matlab-files that replicate figures and tables. Please see ReadMe.txt for more details.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/bte2bk
title: Replication Data for: Risk Aversion and the Gender Gap in the Vote for Populist Radical Right Parties

description: Previous research has established that men are more likely to vote for populist radical right parties (PRRPs) than women. This article shows how cross-national and temporal variations in PRRPs’ electoral success interact with individuals’ risk propensity to affect this gender gap. We hypothesize that gender differences in the electoral support of PRRPs stem from disparities in risk-taking. We conceptualize risk in terms of two components, social and electoral, and demonstrate that women are more risk-averse regarding both. Our analysis is based on public opinion data from 14 countries (2002–2016) combined with macro-level data on PRRPs’ past parliamentary fortunes. To distinguish between the social and the electoral component in risk-taking, we use the illustrative case study of Germany. Findings demonstrate that gender differences in risk-taking and, by implication, the differences between women’s and men’s responses to the electoral context, are key to understanding the voting gender gap.
description: This dataset underwent an independent verification process that replicated the tables and figures in the primary article. For the supplementary materials, verification was performed solely for the successful execution of code. The verification process was carried out by the Odum Institute for Research in Social Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 
<br>
The associated article has been awarded Open Materials Badge. Learn more about the Open Practice Badges from the Center for Open Science.<br>
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/1sirgd
title: A96_7507c.jpg

description: Link to OCHRE database: &lt;a href = 'http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/ad533bb7-2ac8-1337-83d0-643ff265d2e2'&gt;http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/ad533bb7-2ac8-1337-83d0-643ff265d2e2
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/bpotzy
title: Optimal Spatial Weights Matrix for the World Political Map

description: The database includes two types of martices: a geometric and a geopolitical - as well as a sample shapefile they can be used with. The geometric matrix accounts for all the land and sea neighbours of states, at least three neighbours for each country. The geopolitical matrix is based on the regional integration systems and accounts for the level of participation of a country in the relevant integration associations. These weight matrices allow to analyze neighbourhood effect with more precision, than automatically produced alternatives.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/jsgye
title: Passed Resolves; Resolves 1845, c.131, SC1/series 228, Petition of William James

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Annexation of Texas &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10670601"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:10670601&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Scituate &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Morrill Allen, Plymouth; committee on the annexation of Texas &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;William James&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;John Nash&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Joshua James&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1845-01-15,1845-01-15 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the Senate on January 15, 1845 and referred to the committee on the annexation of Texas and received in the House on January 15, 1845 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 78 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 78 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: inhabitants &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Resolves 1845, c.131, passed March 26, 1845 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/lay6u2
title: Passed Resolves; Resolves 1864, c.42, SC1/series 228, Petition of Barnard C. Marchant

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Support for individuals &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25455153"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25455153&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1864-03-01 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Edgartown &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: William H. Sturtevant, Tisbury; committee on claims &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Barnard C. Marchant&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1864-03-04,1864-03-08 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on March 4, 1864 and referred to the committee on claims and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on March 8, 1864 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: guardian of the Indians and people of color resident at Chappequiddic and Christiantown in Dukes County, ["guardian of the Chappaquiddic & Christiantown Indians"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Christiantown Indians, Christian town, Chappaquiddick, Asa Peters, six young children, Holmes Hole, Tisbury, Indian guardians &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Resolves 1864, c.42, passed March 26, 1864 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/psowov
title: Replication Data for: Replication Data for: Millionaire Justices and Attitudes towards the Supreme Court

description: We rely on theories positing general resentment of the rich to argue that people who believe there are greater number of Justices who are millionaires will have more negative attitudes towards the Court than those who believe there are fewer millionaires on the Court. Analyzing the results to a nationally representative survey, we find that individuals who believe a larger number of the Justices are millionaires are more likely to believe the Court gives special rights to the wealth and overall are less likely to view the Court as legitimate. We supplement these results with a survey experiment which demonstrations that individuals believe the Court will become less fair if a millionaire nominee is confirmed to be a Justice and that individuals are less likely to support a millionaire nominee compared to nominees with a lower net worth. Our results have implications for perceptions of bias within the judiciary, the selection of judicial nominees, and how attitudes about the wealthy can influence attitudes towards institutions.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/1uww8h
title: A00_13366.jpg

description: Link to OCHRE database: &lt;a href = 'http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/4aa29594-0461-9767-4970-07eda6c751c4'&gt;http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/4aa29594-0461-9767-4970-07eda6c751c4
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/b5vsgh
title: COVID-19 Impact on Rural Men and Women in Nigeria, Round 4

description: This dataset is the result of a phone survey set up to measure the impact of COVID-19 on rural people in Nigeria. As most governments have urged the population to stay at home to slow down the transmission of the disease, the impact of COVID-19 can affect women and men in different ways: as an income shock (directly or indirectly); as a health and caring shock; as a shock of mobility (affecting access to water, food, firewood, schooling); and as a risk of increased domestic conflict and violence. To capture these various effects on household welfare, this phone survey was conducted with (around) 500 individuals randomly drawn from an existing list of phone numbers collected from previous household surveys with an equal proportion of women and men. The same individuals were also interviewed during other rounds to generate a longitudinal panel allowing to analyze the impact of COVID-19 through time.
description: Household- and Community-level Surveys
description: STATA, 17
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/b7aegf
title: Petition of Gamaliel Bradford

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Indian guardians &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:28548131"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:28548131&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1755-09-24 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Pembroke &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Gamaliel Bradford&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Josiah Edson Jr.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Nathaniel Smith&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 3 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 3 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: the Guardians to the Indians at the Place called Mattekeset in Pembrook in the County of Plymouth, guardians aforesd &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Native American tribe: Mashpee &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: answer, Patience Thomas, Patience Sachamis, Caleb Brand, Peter Job, Mattakeset, Mattakeeset, Mattakeesett, Mattakeesit, leases, lands, Boston, Indian guardians, dwelling houses, buildings, foreigners, new comers, Sachems, women, petitioning, white people, rents, Henry Josselyn, Thomas Josselyn, fences, improvements, saplings, wood, Spencer Phipps, [additional documents in volumes, see pages 609-610, 624-625, 675-676, 696-698] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Massachusetts Archives volume 32, pages 675-676 &lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/1rxxn4
title: A15_28068.jpg

description: Link to OCHRE database: &lt;a href = 'http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/f530e538-23d3-4266-8299-d11fafab9774'&gt;http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/f530e538-23d3-4266-8299-d11fafab9774