DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15146169
title: Table 4 in The discovery of two new species in the Cyrtodactylus irregularis group highlights that hidden diversity remains in the largest clade of the mega-diverse genus Cyrtodactylus

description: Table 4 (continued on next page).Morphological comparisons between Cyrtodactylus chumuensis sp. nov., Cyrtodactylus arndti sp. nov. and 23 congeners from the Cyrtodactylus irregularis complex based on examination of specimens and data obtained from the literature (Ziegler et al. 2002; Nguyen et al. 2006, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2017a, 2017b, 2021; Heidrich et al. 2007; Orlov et al. 2007; Nazarov et al. 2008, 2012; Ngo 2088, 2013; Ngo & Bauer 2008; Ngo et al. 2010; Rösler et al. 2008; Ngo & Chan 2010, 2011; Ngo & Grismer 2012; Ziegler et al. 2010, 2013; Luu et al. 2011, 2017; Phung et al. 2014; Le et al. 2016; Ostrowski et al. 2020, 2021; Do et al. 2021). Abbreviations:? = data not available in literature; – = characteristic not present; + = characteristic present but not uniquely determined; * = regenerated or broken tail.
SpeciesSVL (mm)TaL (mm)VEFSFPPP (M)PP (F)LD4LT4Color pattern of dorsumSubcaudals1Cyrtodactylus chumuensis sp. nov.67.551.4*43–454–50–26–7?16–1917–21bandedabsent2Cyrtodactylus arndti sp. nov.73.4–80.950.1*–91.5126–385–110–26615–2017–22bandedpresent3C. badenensis59.3–74.158.6–82.425–29absentabsent00?18–22bandedpresent4C. bidoupimontis74.0–86.375.0–8638–438–10absent4–6015–2018–23bandedabsent5C. bugiamapensis58.6–76.865.3–83.036–466–10absent7–110–715–1717–20blotchedabsent6C. buchardi60.0–65.046.0–54.030absentabsent901412blotchedabsent7C. caovansungi90.4–94.0120.038–4486902223–25bandedpresent8C. cattienensis43.5–69.051–64.728–423–8absent6–80–8 pitted scales12–1614–19bandedabsent9C. chungi66.6–68.562.8*–82.230–314–6absent76?17–20bandedabsent10C. cryptus62.5–90.863.5–88.447–50absentabsent9–11018–1920–23bandedabsent11C. cucdongensis55.8–65.9max. 81.341–445–9absent5–64–613–1815–20bandedabsent12C. culaochamensis69.8–79.889.7–91.245–50absentabsent7–8absent18–1920–23bandedabsent13C. datimax 70.1max 57.342–484–73–4 each5–6??18–19blotchedabsent14C. gialaiensis50.1–62.8?38–45absentabsent9–100–814–1515–17bandedabsent15C. huynhi67.2–79.861.5–78.643–463–53–87–90–8 pitted scales14–1717–21bandedabsent16C. irregularis72.0–86.066.0–74.038–457–8absent5–70–615–1618–19blotchedabsent17C. kingsadai83.0–94.0max 11739–469–120–47–94–819–2121–25bandedpresent18C. orlovi61–77.7Max 71.236–393–8absent5–6015–1716–19bandedabsent19C. phnomchiensis76.1–80.756.9–79.145–540–8absent4–51–7 pitted scales18–2020–23bandedabsent20C. phumyensis63.6–66.8?33–415–7absent5–76 pitted scales18–1918–21bandedabsent21C. phuocbinhensis46.0–60.476.143–475absent7016–2117–19striped/blotchedabsent22C. pseudoquadrivirgatus48.6–83.355.7–82.341–57absentabsent5–95–1015–2116–25blotchedabsent23C. raglai95–111.7113.4–13536–399–10absent50?21–22bandedpresent24C. sangi49.9–56.347.9*374absent74 pitted scale??bandedabsent25C. takouensis74.7–81.177.7–91.039–403–50–23–4016–1718–20bandedpresent26C. taynguyenensis60.0–85.066.0–94.042–49absentabsent6013–1817–21blotchedabsent27C. yangbayensis78.5–92.391.3–109.139–465–160–26–8016–1915–17bandedpresent28C. ziegleri84.6–93.095.0–107.033–398–100–65–80–816–1918–21bandedabsent
description: Published as part of Ngo, Hanh Thi, Hormann, Helene, Le, Minh Duc, Pham, Cuong The, Phung, Trung My, Do, Dang Trong, Ostrowski, Sabrina, Nguyen, Truong Quang & Ziegler, Thomas, 2023, The discovery of two new species in the Cyrtodactylus irregularis group highlights that hidden diversity remains in the largest clade of the mega-diverse genus Cyrtodactylus, pp. 91-92 in European Journal of Taxonomy 875 (1) on page 91, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.875.2141, http://zenodo.org/record/8064396