DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24165236
title: Additional file 1 of Highly sex specific gene expression in Jojoba

description: Additional file 1: Figure S1. Functional Annotation of the coding sequencing of jojoba male Jojoba genome (reference for RNA-Seq). (A) Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) for RNA-Seq reference. (B) Gene Ontology (GO) for the RNA-Seq’s reference. Illustration of the three GO categories Biological Process (BP), Molecular Function (MF) and Cellular Component (CC). The highest sequencing number linked with GO term of BP, MF, and CC were cellular process, binding, and cellular anatomical entity respectively.(C) Enzyme Code (EC) Distribution for the RNA-Seq’s reference. The highest three sequencings associated with EC classes were transferases, hydrolases and oxidoreductases. (D) Top-Hit Species Distribution based on blast analysis. The three highest species were Beta vulgaris followed by Chenopodium quinoa and Spinacia oleracea. Figure S2. Illustration of InterProScan Domain Distribution for transcriptome analysis reference. The InterProScan (IPS) Domain of the coding sequences (CDS) of male jojoba plant, which used as reference for RNA-Seq analysis. The three highest sequences associated with IPS domain were Protein kinase domain followed by Zinc finger Ring-type and RNA recognition motif domain. Figure S3. Illustration of both mapped and un-mapped percentage of male and female samples against the reference of coding sequences of male jojoba plant. The mapped percentage of male samples ranged between 52 to 55 % whereas the un-mapped percentage ranged between 45 to 49 %. The mapping percentage of female samples ranged between 51 to 55% and 44 to 48% for un-mapping reads. The pie charts are an example of mapping one male sample (R1MS2, S3, S4) and one female sample (R1FS2, S3, S4) against the reference. Male=M, Female=F, Replicate=R, Stage=S. Figure S4. Principal Component Analysis of the five male and female groups. The principal component 1 explained 51.9 % whereas principal component explained 12.8 %. The five female groups showed a tight cluster with each other whereas the five male groups showed a cluster in R1M S2, S3, S4, R2 MS2, S3, S4, and R3 M S2, S3, S4 and with a small distance with R4 M S2, S3, S4 and one outlier group R5 M S2, S3, S4. R=Replicate, M=Male, F=Female, S=Stage. Figure S5. Gene Ontology (GO) classification of up regulated significantly differentially expressed genes. Illustration of the three GO categories Biological Process (BP), Molecular Function (MF) and Cellular Component (CC). The highest sequencing number linked with GO term of BP, MF, and CC were cellular process, cellular anatomical entity, and binding respectively. Figure S6. Gene Ontology (GO) classification of down regulated significantly differentially expressed genes. Illustration of the three GO categories Biological Process (BP), Molecular Function (MF) and Cellular Component (CC). The highest sequencing number linked with GO term of BP, MF, and CC were cellular process, cellular anatomical entity, and binding respectively. Figure S7. The FoldGO output data for comparison of gene expression of male flower relative to female. The chart illustrates the fold-change intervals detected by Fold-change-Specific Enrichment Analysis (FSEA) where selected Gene Ontology (GO) terms (the whole list is in Table S7 and S8) displayed the most significant enrichment compared to the whole Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs). The blue and yellow color represents the up and down regulated process of fold-change GO terms respectively.