cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/cvpyk
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1851, Docket 13162, SC1/series 231, Petition of Charles Tucker

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: To protect rights and liberties of Commonwealth inhabitants &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858471"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858471&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Webster &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Samuel Clark, Northborough; select committee on slavery &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Charles Tucker&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;F.H. Underwood&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Eunice Leavens&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1851-02-07,1851-02-08 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on February 7, 1851 and referred to the select committee on slavery and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on February 8, 1851 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 59 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 48 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Other male signatures: 8 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Unidentified signatures: 2 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: inhabitants, legal voters, other persons, [females], [other males], ["voters"], ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Basing lead petitioner on back information; includes modified signatures &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1851, Docket 13162 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ibilhs
title: Replication Data for: The Personal Vote in a Polarized Era

description: This study offers experimental tests of the “personal vote” in an era of heightened partisanship and polarization. Using three national surveys, we randomly present information about a hypothetical legislator’s voting record, committee assignment, and district-oriented work. After evaluating the legislator, respondents are presented with information about a challenger running on a nationalized message. Respondents, especially out-partisans, report much greater satisfaction with the legislator when told about his district-oriented activities, but increased willingness to vote for the legislator is more limited and mostly reserved for independents. In varying information about the legislator’s voting record, we also find scant evidence that bipartisan legislators are better at securing a personal vote. In two experimental extensions, we show that our findings generalize to evaluations of real senators, and that nationalizing elections is one possible way that opponents can thwart incumbent efforts at winning the votes of independents and out-partisans through traditional district-oriented appeals.
description: This dataset underwent an independent verification process that replicated the tables and figures in the primary article. For the supplementary materials, verification was performed solely for the successful execution of code. The verification process was carried out by the Odum Institute for Research in Social Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 
<br>
The associated article has been awarded Open Materials and Open Data Badges. Learn more about the Open Practice Badges from the Center for Open Science.<br>
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/krfpvu
title: Replication Data for Using Remote Tracking to Detect and Deter Medications Theft in Malawi

description: This replication data applies to the World Bank Strategic Impact Evaluation Fund (SIEF) Final Report, submitted in June 2022
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/q0k1mk
title: Wright Files I-Z Edited; Docketed Case: 71-1628
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/5358lm
title: Wright Files I-Z Edited; Docketed Case: 76-1579
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/cnea4z
title: California Poll: 8503 -- July 31 - August 6, 1985

description: The Field Poll, established in 1945 as The California Poll by Mervin Field, has operated continuously as an independent, non-partisan, media-sponsored public opinion news service. Each year the Field Polls cover a wide range of political and social topics examining California public opinion. Continuing measures are made of voter support for leading political figures vying for major state and federal offices, job ratings of important political figures and reactions to significant political events. Voter awareness, understanding and predispositions of major campaign issues and salient statewide ballot propositions are also tracked over time. For poll 8503 N=1013.
description: Subject: STANDARD DEPOSIT TERMS 1.0 Type: DATAPASS:TERMS:STANDARD:1.0 Notes: The UCLA Social Science Data Archive (“the Archive”) gives permission and any required licenses to Data-PASS to make the Content available for archiving, preservation and access (with permission of the Archive), within the Data Preservation Alliance for the Social Sciences ("Data-PASS") in accordance with the Data-PASS terms (the "Terms") of use (available from: http://www.icpsr.org/Data-PASS). Including permission to: (a) redisseminate copies of the Data Collection in a variety of distribution formats only according to the standard terms of use of the Archive; (b) promote and advertise the Data Collection in any publicity (in any form) for Data-PASS and the Archive; (c) describe, catalog, validate and document the Content; (d) store, translate, copy or re-format the Data Collection in any way to ensure its future preservation and accessibility, improve usability and/or protect respondent confidentiality; (e) incorporate metadata (cataloging information) or documentation regarding this study into public access catalogues. The Archive represents and warrants that the Content conforms to all Terms and that the Archive is lawfully entitled and has full authority to license Data-Pass to use the Materials in the ways described in the Terms.;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ickbvs
title: Replication Data for: Hormonal, metabolic and inflammatory circulating biomarker profiles in obese and non-obese Brazilian middle-aged women

description: This is a replication dataset for "Hormonal, metabolic and inflammatory circulating biomarker profiles in obese and non-obese Brazilian middle-aged women". The data were obtained from a cross-sectional study conducted at a university hospital in Northeast Brazil from 2017 to 2018.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/pzywum
title: Wright Files I-Z Edited; Docketed Case: 76-1351
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ibqpb
title: Massachusetts Archives Collection. v.73-Military, 1747-1750. SC1/series 45X, Petition of Francis Brinley

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Court cases &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13906022"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13906022&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1749-04 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Francis Brinley&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Increase Sumner&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1749-04-18,1749-04-19 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the Council on April 18, 1749 and read and ordered and sent for concurrence and received in the House on April 19, 1749 and read and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 2 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, read, ordered, sent, received, read, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 2 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: gentlemen &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Joseph Bedunah, Joseph Beduna, mollatto freeman, constant voter, white woman, eastward, action of trespass, Robert Auchmuty, Roxbury &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Massachusetts Archives volume 73, page 414 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/kndmsq
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1851, Docket 13162, SC1/series 231, Petition of T.W. Higginson [Thomas Wentworth Higginson]

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: To protect rights and liberties of Commonwealth inhabitants &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858410"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858410&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Newburyport &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: John Girdler II, Manchester; joint special committee on slavery &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;T.W. Higginson [Thomas Wentworth Higginson]&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Margaret H. Andrews&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Lucy H. Balch&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Richard Plumer&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;William Ashby&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1851-02-08 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House and referred to the joint special committee on slavery and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on February 8, 1851 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 44 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 31 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 13 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: inhabitants, legal voters, other persons, [females] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1851, Docket 13162 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/lbav1q
title: Replication Data for: Conflict, Protection, and Punishment: Repercussions of Violence in Eastern DR Congo

description: How does armed conflict affect attitudes that tolerate violence against women? This paper examines the effects of armed violence on preferences for punishing crimes against women using original quantitative data from 80 focus groups across 20 villages in Democratic Republic of Congo and a matched pair design. Challenging unidirectional logics within theories of violence against women; the data reveal that local exposure to armed violence increases how severely men prefer to punish rape while decreasing how severely men and women prefer to punish domestic violence. Building inductively, I develop a theory of protective masculine norms to account for armed conflict's gendered and crime-specific effects. When armed violence heightens demand for local male protection, crimes perceived to pose a community threat are affected differently from 'private' crimes.
description: This dataset underwent an independent verification process that replicated the tables and figures in the primary article. For the supplementary materials, verification was performed solely for the successful execution of code. The verification process was carried out by the Odum Institute for Research in Social Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 

<br>
The associated article has been awarded Open Materials and Open Data Badges. Learn more about the Open Practice Badges from the Center for Open Science.<br>
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/pnvwhd
title: SONA Fall 2016

description: This data contains demographic information and results from the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/54qfpi
title: Regulation and Upper Class Bias Data

description: This is replication data for an article examining the relationship between campaign finance regulation and organizational bias toward upper class actors in campaign finance systems
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/fgwhuf
title: Replication data for: The Hegemon's Purse: No Economic Peace Between Democracies

description: Cox & Drury extend the democratic peace literature from the domain of militarized conflict to economic sanctions. Their analysis of economic sanctions data from 1978 through 2000 finds that democracies are more likely to enact sanctions, but are less likely to do so against other democracies. In this article, we extend their analysis in three different ways: first, we improve their methodology and sample size; second, we examine interactions between variables, and third, we additional hypotheses
. We find that the substantive effects of joint democracy on the likelihood of sanctions disappear after accounting for the disproportionate role of the United States (and correcting for method), that the United States has a significantly different pattern of implementing sanctions than other states, and that the trade dependence of a potential sender plays a significant role in determining the likelihood of sanctions.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/q0oscg
title: Wright Files I-Z Edited; Docketed Case: 76-1713
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/5wffp0
title: Replication Data for #DictatorErdogan: How Social Media Bans Trigger Backlash

description: This repository includes the data and code for "#DictatorErdogan: How Social Media Bans Trigger Backlash" forthcoming in Political Communication. See READ ME file for more information.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/clzaos
title: Synthetic Automotive Engineering Dataset: A Realistic Simulated Dataset for Vehicle Analysis and Research

description: We present the "Synthetic Automotive Engineering Dataset," a meticulously crafted compilation designed to replicate diverse automotive scenarios through meticulous data simulation. This dataset contains an array of instances meticulously designed to encapsulate the intricate dimensions inherent in various aspects of the automotive domain. The dataset serves as a resource for researchers, engineers, analysts, and enthusiasts, offering the opportunity to explore and evaluate various vehicular technologies, market trends, and industry dynamics.

The dataset features a spectrum of parameters including vehicle types, fuel variations, manufacturers, model years, and geographic locations, collectively shaping the nuanced landscape of the automotive sector. Notably, the dataset is algorithmically generated and does not originate from real-world data sources, ensuring its status as a representative of synthetic data constructs.

Key parameters within the dataset include vehicle types, such as Sedans, SUVs, Trucks, Hatchbacks, and Convertibles, mirroring real-world consumer choices and preferences. Fuel types—Gasoline, Diesel, Electric, and Hybrid—reflect the dynamic landscape of propulsion technologies and environmental considerations. Prominent manufacturers, including Toyota, Ford, Honda, BMW, and Tesla, offer insights into diverse design philosophies and brand identities prevalent within the field.

The dataset spans model years from 2000 to 2022, enabling observations of trends and technological developments over time. Attributes such as mileage, horsepower, price, and location introduce layers of realism to facilitate nuanced analysis. Mileage distribution is representative of vehicular wear and tear, while horsepower variations by fuel type reflect distinct performance potentials across different propulsion methods.

The "Synthetic Automotive Engineering Dataset" provides a platform for researchers and engineers to unravel correlations, elucidate interdependencies, and decipher intricate patterns within the automotive domain. As a resource for algorithmic validation, model calibration, and comprehensive data exploration, the dataset supports method refinement and meaningful insights generation.
description: The "Synthetic Automotive Engineering Dataset" was algorithmically generated to simulate diverse automotive scenarios. The dataset's parameters were carefully designed to reflect key attributes such as vehicle types, fuel variations, manufacturers, model years, and geographic locations.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/fr04xu
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 21,310
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/aqxaq
title: Passed Resolves; Resolves 1855, c.15, SC1/series 228, Petition of Zacheus Howwoswee

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Property &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13448056"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13448056&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 1855-01-12 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Gayhead &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Ivory H. Lucas, Nantucket and Dukes County; joint special committee on the petition of the Punkapoag Indians &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Zacheus Howwoswee&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Samuel Peters&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Aaron Cooper&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1855-01-24,1855-01-25 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the Senate on January 24, 1855 and referred to the joint special committee on the petition of the Punkapoag Indians and sent for concurrence and received in the House on January 25, 1855 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 3 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Males of color signatures: 3 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: on behalf of the Indians and people of colour resident at Gay Head in the county of Dukes county, overseers of Gay Head, [males of color] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: Gayhead, boundary line, boundaries, divisions, Chilmark, never been recorded, description lost or secreted, disputes, encroachment, claimed, occupied, lands, recover and secure our rights, commissioners, appointment, determine and run &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Resolves 1855, c.15, passed March 9, 1855 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/atdtje
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 75-1104
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ebycpb
title: Evaluation of the effect of soft drinks on the surface roughness of dental enamel in natural human teeth

description: Exposing enamel to soft drinks and beverages causes changes in the microscopical morphology. Changes in the physical characteristics, like hardness and surface roughness, were studied with various parameters. Factors such as pH, exposed duration, and other content of the soft drinks have different effects on the enamel
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/54tvhz
title: Wright Files I-Z Edited; Docketed Case: 72-1727
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/dtmwma
title: Wright Casebook Edited; Docketed Case: 84-5820
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/krsp4
title: House Unpassed Legislation 1848, Docket 2157, SC1/series 230, Petition of Rufus L. Mason

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Abolition of capital punishment &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13448127"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13448127&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Hancock &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Leonard Doty, Hancock; committee on the judiciary; committee on the subject &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Rufus L. Mason&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;George Clark&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Charles B. Wells&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1848-02-04,1848-02-16 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on February 4, 1848 and referred to the committee on the judiciary and received in the House on February 16, 1848 and referred to the committee on the subject &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 44 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, received, referred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 44 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: [Many additional documents in folder; Doctor/M.D. next to signature] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1848, Docket 2157 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/oej3pf
title: Replication Data for: Analysis of Scholar fame

description: Calculate the data on the fame of scholars and study the papers of highly renowned scholars
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/vjr1qe
title: Wright Files I-Z Edited; Docketed Case: 85-5907
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/cc6dii
title: Replication Data for: Who Are Black Lives Matter Activists? Niche Realization in a Multimovement Environment

description: These files are associated with replicating the results of Michael T. Heaney, “Who Are Black Lives Matter Activists? Niche Realization in a Multimovement Environment,” Perspectives on Politics, 2023.

All analysis was performed using StataIC 15 (64-bit).