cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7940539
title: Physico-chemical characterization of sterilized Co2.25Fe0.75O4 nanoparticles by XPS / HAXPES / SEM

description: Here a dataset of XPS, HAXPES and SEM measurements for the physico-chemical characterization of sterilized nanoparticles is presented. The measurements are part of the H2020 project “NanoSolveIT”. Co<sub>2.25</sub>Fe<sub>0.75</sub>O<sub>4</sub> nanoparticles were provided by Promethean Particles and treated differently by project partners from the University of Birmingham (EMR identifier in the project: ERM00000406, ERM00000448, ERM00000427). The particles were treated by different sterilization methods (autoclave or microwave) and BSA was or was not added as stabilizer. This finally leads to five different samples: pristine, autoclave, microwave, autoclave with BSA, microwave with BSA. Prior to the measurements, the samples were prepared from the solution as drop cast on Si wafers. First SEM and EDS measurements were performed, followed by XPS and HAXPES measurements on the same samples. Here at first survey spectra were recorded followed by high resolution spectra. For XPS / HAXPES several Si-wafers were mounted together on one platen. The platen was left in the intro chamber of the instrument for several hours before the measurement started. Equipment: SEM images were acquired with a <em>Supra 40 </em>(Zeiss) SEM equipped with a <em>Quantax 400 </em>(Bruker) SDD EDS spectrometer. For X-ray spectroscopy experiments, a combined XPS / HAXPES spectrometer (<em>Quantes </em>from ULVAC-PHI) was used, where XPS is measured at 1486.6 eV (monochromatic Al Kα source) and HAXPES at 5414.9 eV (monochromatic Cr Kα source). Here it is possible to perform the measurements at the exact same position. Data: For SEM, the data are given in .tif format. For XPS / HAXPES the raw data are given as .spe (PHI format) and .npl (VAMAS format) files. The measurement conditions are given in the data files. Naming of data: SEM: <em>sample_treatment (n)</em>, with n a consecutive number. XPS / HAXPES: For the .spe files <em>Pn.m.o.sample_treatment</em> and for the corresponding .npl files: <em>m.npl</em> with Pn: platen-number, m: spectrum number (order of the measurements); o: point-number, of the position on the sample, sample_treatment with "m" for microwave and "a" for autoclave. The authors thank Sigrid Benemann, who performed the SEM measurements.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7940538
title: Physico-chemical characterization of sterilized Co2.25Fe0.75O4 nanoparticles by XPS / HAXPES / SEM

description: Here a dataset of XPS, HAXPES and SEM measurements for the physico-chemical characterization of sterilized nanoparticles is presented. The measurements are part of the H2020 project “NanoSolveIT”. Co<sub>2.25</sub>Fe<sub>0.75</sub>O<sub>4</sub> nanoparticles were provided by Promethean Particles and treated differently by project partners from the University of Birmingham (EMR identifier in the project: ERM00000406, ERM00000448, ERM00000427). The particles were treated by different sterilization methods (autoclave or microwave) and BSA was or was not added as stabilizer. This finally leads to five different samples: pristine, autoclave, microwave, autoclave with BSA, microwave with BSA. Prior to the measurements, the samples were prepared from the solution as drop cast on Si wafers. First SEM and EDS measurements were performed, followed by XPS and HAXPES measurements on the same samples. Here at first survey spectra were recorded followed by high resolution spectra. For XPS / HAXPES several Si-wafers were mounted together on one platen. The platen was left in the intro chamber of the instrument for several hours before the measurement started. Equipment: SEM images were acquired with a <em>Supra 40 </em>(Zeiss) SEM equipped with a <em>Quantax 400 </em>(Bruker) SDD EDS spectrometer. For X-ray spectroscopy experiments, a combined XPS / HAXPES spectrometer (<em>Quantes </em>from ULVAC-PHI) was used, where XPS is measured at 1486.6 eV (monochromatic Al Kα source) and HAXPES at 5414.9 eV (monochromatic Cr Kα source). Here it is possible to perform the measurements at the exact same position. Data: For SEM, the data are given in .tif format. For XPS / HAXPES the raw data are given as .spe (PHI format) and .npl (VAMAS format) files. The measurement conditions are given in the data files. Naming of data: SEM: <em>sample_treatment (n)</em>, with n a consecutive number. XPS / HAXPES: For the .spe files <em>Pn.m.o.sample_treatment</em> and for the corresponding .npl files: <em>m.npl</em> with Pn: platen-number, m: spectrum number (order of the measurements); o: point-number, of the position on the sample, sample_treatment with "m" for microwave and "a" for autoclave. The authors thank Sigrid Benemann, who performed the SEM measurements.
DOI: 10.17037/data.00003427
title: Clinical codelist - cancer - gold

description: Read codes for Cancer.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7940272
title: Physico-chemical characterization of sterilized Co1.5Fe1.5O4 nanoparticles by XPS / HAXPES / SEM

description: Here a dataset of XPS, HAXPES and SEM measurements for the physico-chemical characterization of sterilized nanoparticles is presented. The measurements are part of the H2020 project “NanoSolveIT”. Co<sub>1.5</sub>Fe<sub>1.5</sub>O<sub>4</sub> nanoparticles were provided by Promethean Particles and treated differently by project partners from the University of Birmingham (EMR-Identifier in the project: ERM00000407, ERM00000449, ERM00000428). The particles were treated by different sterilization methods (autoclave or microwave) and BSA was or was not added as stabilizer. This finally leads to five different samples: pristine, autoclave, microwave, autoclave with BSA, microwave with BSA. Prior to the measurements, the samples were prepared from the solution as drop cast on Si wafers. First SEM and EDS measurements were performed, followed by XPS and HAXPES measurements on the same samples. Here at first survey spectra were recorded followed by high resolution spectra. For XPS / HAXPES several Si-wafers were mounted together on one platen. The platen was left in the intro chamber of the instrument for several hours before the measurement started. Equipment: SEM images were acquired with a <em>Supra 40 </em>(Zeiss) SEM equipped with a <em>Quantax 400 </em>(Bruker) SDD EDS spectrometer. For X-ray spectroscopy experiments, a combined XPS / HAXPES spectrometer (<em>Quantes </em>from ULVAC-PHI) was used, where XPS is measured at 1486.6 eV (monochromatic Al Kα source) and HAXPES at 5414.9 eV (monochromatic Cr Kα source). Here it is possible to perform the measurements at the exact same position. Data: For SEM, the data are given in .tif format. For XPS / HAXPES the raw data are given as .spe (PHI format) and .npl (VAMAS format) files. The measurement conditions are given in the data files. Naming of data: SEM: <em>sample_treatment (n)</em>, with n a consecutive number. XPS / HAXPES: For the .spe files <em>Pn.m.o.sample_treatment</em> and for the corresponding .npl files: <em>m.npl</em> with Pn: platen-number, m: spectrum number (order of the measurements); o: point-number, of the position on the sample, sample_treatment with "m" for microwave and "a" for autoclave. The authors thank Sigrid Benemann, who performed the SEM measurements.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7940271
title: Physico-chemical characterization of sterilized Co1.5Fe1.5O4 nanoparticles by XPS / HAXPES / SEM

description: Here a dataset of XPS, HAXPES and SEM measurements for the physico-chemical characterization of sterilized nanoparticles is presented. The measurements are part of the H2020 project “NanoSolveIT”. Co<sub>1.5</sub>Fe<sub>1.5</sub>O<sub>4</sub> nanoparticles were provided by Promethean Particles and treated differently by project partners from the University of Birmingham (EMR-Identifier in the project: ERM00000407, ERM00000449, ERM00000428). The particles were treated by different sterilization methods (autoclave or microwave) and BSA was or was not added as stabilizer. This finally leads to five different samples: pristine, autoclave, microwave, autoclave with BSA, microwave with BSA. Prior to the measurements, the samples were prepared from the solution as drop cast on Si wafers. First SEM and EDS measurements were performed, followed by XPS and HAXPES measurements on the same samples. Here at first survey spectra were recorded followed by high resolution spectra. For XPS / HAXPES several Si-wafers were mounted together on one platen. The platen was left in the intro chamber of the instrument for several hours before the measurement started. Equipment: SEM images were acquired with a <em>Supra 40 </em>(Zeiss) SEM equipped with a <em>Quantax 400 </em>(Bruker) SDD EDS spectrometer. For X-ray spectroscopy experiments, a combined XPS / HAXPES spectrometer (<em>Quantes </em>from ULVAC-PHI) was used, where XPS is measured at 1486.6 eV (monochromatic Al Kα source) and HAXPES at 5414.9 eV (monochromatic Cr Kα source). Here it is possible to perform the measurements at the exact same position. Data: For SEM, the data are given in .tif format. For XPS / HAXPES the raw data are given as .spe (PHI format) and .npl (VAMAS format) files. The measurement conditions are given in the data files. Naming of data: SEM: <em>sample_treatment (n)</em>, with n a consecutive number. XPS / HAXPES: For the .spe files <em>Pn.m.o.sample_treatment</em> and for the corresponding .npl files: <em>m.npl</em> with Pn: platen-number, m: spectrum number (order of the measurements); o: point-number, of the position on the sample, sample_treatment with "m" for microwave and "a" for autoclave. The authors thank Sigrid Benemann, who performed the SEM measurements.
DOI: 10.17037/data.00003426
title: Clinical codelist - cancer - aurum

description: Read, SNOME and EMIS codes for Cancer.
DOI: 10.17037/data.00003422
title: Clinical codelist - Alcohol - gold

description: Read codes for alcohol
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.23275238
title: Data and <strong>coding</strong> used in paper entitled <strong>"MIU: Deep Embedded Building Cluster Model of Urban Functional Zoning"</strong>

description: Data and <strong>coding</strong> used in paper entitled <strong>"MIU: Deep Embedded Building Cluster Model of Urban Functional Zoning".The compressed package contains 6 folders.</strong> <strong>Building Footprint: Building vector data were used to extract geometric and compactness featrues.</strong> <strong>Google Earth Image: VHR images were applied to extract spectral and textural features.</strong> <strong>Luojia 1-01 Nighttime Light Image: Nighttime data were used to extract brightness features.</strong> <strong>OSM Street:OSM road networks were used to extract location features.</strong> <strong>POI of Study Area:POI data were used to generate labels for training the Word2Vec model.</strong> <strong>Python Code:DEC code was used to process the cluster for generating the MIU; Word2Vec code was used train the Word2Vec model.</strong>
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7940770
title: Physico-chemical characterization of sterilized Co0.75Fe2.25O4 nanoparticles by XPS / HAXPES / SEM

description: Here a dataset of XPS, HAXPES and SEM measurements for the physico-chemical characterization of sterilized nanoparticles is presented. The measurements are part of the H2020 project “NanoSolveIT”. Co<sub>0.75</sub>Fe<sub>2.25</sub>O<sub>4</sub> nanoparticles were provided by Promethean Particles and treated differently by project partners from the University of Birmingham (EMR identifiers in the project: ERM00000408, ERM00000450, ERM00000429). The particles were treated by different sterilization methods (autoclave or microwave) and BSA was or was not added as stabilizer. This finally leads to five different samples: pristine, autoclave, microwave, autoclave with BSA, microwave with BSA. Prior to the measurements, the samples were prepared from the solution as drop cast on Si wafers. First SEM and EDS measurements were performed, followed by XPS and HAXPES measurements on the same samples. Here at first survey spectra were recorded followed by high resolution spectra. For XPS / HAXPES several Si-wafers were mounted together on one platen. The platen was left in the intro chamber of the instrument for several hours before the measurement started. Equipment: SEM images were acquired with a <em>Supra 40 </em>(Zeiss) SEM equipped with a <em>Quantax 400 </em>(Bruker) SDD EDS spectrometer. For X-ray spectroscopy experiments, a combined XPS / HAXPES spectrometer (<em>Quantes </em>from ULVAC-PHI) was used, where XPS is measured at 1486.6 eV (monochromatic Al Kα source) and HAXPES at 5414.9 eV (monochromatic Cr Kα source). Here it is possible to perform the measurements at the exact same position. Data: For SEM, the data are given in .tif format. For XPS / HAXPES the raw data are given as .spe (PHI format) and .npl (VAMAS format) files. The measurement conditions are given in the data files. Naming of data: SEM: <em>sample_treatment (n)</em>, with n a consecutive number. XPS / HAXPES: For the .spe files <em>Pn.m.o.sample_treatment</em> and for the corresponding .npl files: <em>m.npl</em> with Pn: platen-number, m: spectrum number (order of the measurements); o: point-number, of the position on the sample, sample_treatment with "m" for microwave and "a" for autoclave. The authors thank Sigrid Benemann, who performed the SEM measurements.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7940769
title: Physico-chemical characterization of sterilized Co0.75Fe2.25O4 nanoparticles by XPS / HAXPES / SEM

description: Here a dataset of XPS, HAXPES and SEM measurements for the physico-chemical characterization of sterilized nanoparticles is presented. The measurements are part of the H2020 project “NanoSolveIT”. Co<sub>0.75</sub>Fe<sub>2.25</sub>O<sub>4</sub> nanoparticles were provided by Promethean Particles and treated differently by project partners from the University of Birmingham (EMR identifiers in the project: ERM00000408, ERM00000450, ERM00000429). The particles were treated by different sterilization methods (autoclave or microwave) and BSA was or was not added as stabilizer. This finally leads to five different samples: pristine, autoclave, microwave, autoclave with BSA, microwave with BSA. Prior to the measurements, the samples were prepared from the solution as drop cast on Si wafers. First SEM and EDS measurements were performed, followed by XPS and HAXPES measurements on the same samples. Here at first survey spectra were recorded followed by high resolution spectra. For XPS / HAXPES several Si-wafers were mounted together on one platen. The platen was left in the intro chamber of the instrument for several hours before the measurement started. Equipment: SEM images were acquired with a <em>Supra 40 </em>(Zeiss) SEM equipped with a <em>Quantax 400 </em>(Bruker) SDD EDS spectrometer. For X-ray spectroscopy experiments, a combined XPS / HAXPES spectrometer (<em>Quantes </em>from ULVAC-PHI) was used, where XPS is measured at 1486.6 eV (monochromatic Al Kα source) and HAXPES at 5414.9 eV (monochromatic Cr Kα source). Here it is possible to perform the measurements at the exact same position. Data: For SEM, the data are given in .tif format. For XPS / HAXPES the raw data are given as .spe (PHI format) and .npl (VAMAS format) files. The measurement conditions are given in the data files. Naming of data: SEM: <em>sample_treatment (n)</em>, with n a consecutive number. XPS / HAXPES: For the .spe files <em>Pn.m.o.sample_treatment</em> and for the corresponding .npl files: <em>m.npl</em> with Pn: platen-number, m: spectrum number (order of the measurements); o: point-number, of the position on the sample, sample_treatment with "m" for microwave and "a" for autoclave. The authors thank Sigrid Benemann, who performed the SEM measurements.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.23276171
title: Supplementary Material for: The top 100 most cited articles on Acupuncture in the last 20 years: a Bibliometric Analysis

description: Background: Acupuncture has gained increasing international attention in recent decades. The act of incorporating acupuncture treatment into the routine treatment of COVID-19 in China drove us to review the 100 most influential articles of the last 20 years to learn about the current status and trends of acupuncture. Method: Articles related to acupuncture from January 1, 2001 to July 4, 2022 were searched in the Clarivate Analytics Web of Science Core Collection database. The top 100 most cited publications were selected and information were extracted. Software VOSviewer, GraphPad Prism, Scimago Graphica and CiteSpace were used to visualize and analyze the extracted data. Result: The 100 most cited articles were identified, with an average of 218 citations (range: 131-625). The majority of the top 100 articles were from the United States (n = 53). The institution that published the most highly cited papers was Harvard University (n = 16). The most influential team was Klaus Linde's group. Pain was the top ranked journal in terms of number of publications. The largest clusters for co-occurrence keyword analysis focused on acupuncture and electroacupuncture analgesia and brain imaging responses to acupuncture stimulation via functional MRI. The two highest strength burst keywords were "randomized controlled trials" and "osteoarthritis", with "randomized controlled trials" being a consistent burst keyword from 2011 to the present. Conclusion: This study provides insight into articles of historical significance in the field of acupuncture through bibliometric analysis. These data should provide clinicians and researchers with insight into future directions related to acupuncture.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.23276171.v1
title: Supplementary Material for: The top 100 most cited articles on Acupuncture in the last 20 years: a Bibliometric Analysis

description: Background: Acupuncture has gained increasing international attention in recent decades. The act of incorporating acupuncture treatment into the routine treatment of COVID-19 in China drove us to review the 100 most influential articles of the last 20 years to learn about the current status and trends of acupuncture. Method: Articles related to acupuncture from January 1, 2001 to July 4, 2022 were searched in the Clarivate Analytics Web of Science Core Collection database. The top 100 most cited publications were selected and information were extracted. Software VOSviewer, GraphPad Prism, Scimago Graphica and CiteSpace were used to visualize and analyze the extracted data. Result: The 100 most cited articles were identified, with an average of 218 citations (range: 131-625). The majority of the top 100 articles were from the United States (n = 53). The institution that published the most highly cited papers was Harvard University (n = 16). The most influential team was Klaus Linde's group. Pain was the top ranked journal in terms of number of publications. The largest clusters for co-occurrence keyword analysis focused on acupuncture and electroacupuncture analgesia and brain imaging responses to acupuncture stimulation via functional MRI. The two highest strength burst keywords were "randomized controlled trials" and "osteoarthritis", with "randomized controlled trials" being a consistent burst keyword from 2011 to the present. Conclusion: This study provides insight into articles of historical significance in the field of acupuncture through bibliometric analysis. These data should provide clinicians and researchers with insight into future directions related to acupuncture.
DOI: 10.21227/d1pq-2r72
title: CFD-SUC simulations

description: This is dataset used for a paper titled 'A Novel Stochastic Unit Commitment Characterized by Closed-loop Forecast-and-Decision for Wind In-tegrated Power Systems', which includes wind data and line data.This is dataset used for a paper titled 'A Novel Stochastic Unit Commitment Characterized by Closed-loop Forecast-and-Decision for Wind In-tegrated Power Systems', which includes wind data and line data.This is dataset used for a paper titled 'A Novel Stochastic Unit Commitment Characterized by Closed-loop Forecast-and-Decision for Wind In-tegrated Power Systems', which includes wind data and line data.This is dataset used for a paper titled 'A Novel Stochastic Unit Commitment Characterized by Closed-loop Forecast-and-Decision for Wind In-tegrated Power Systems', which includes wind data and line data.This is dataset used for a paper titled 'A Novel Stochastic Unit Commitment Characterized by Closed-loop Forecast-and-Decision for Wind In-tegrated Power Systems', which includes wind data and line data.This is dataset used for a paper titled 'A Novel Stochastic Unit Commitment Characterized by Closed-loop Forecast-and-Decision for Wind In-tegrated Power Systems', which includes wind data and line data.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7941002
title: Physico-chemical characterization of sterilized Fe2O3 nanoparticles by XPS / HAXPES / SEM

description: Here a dataset of XPS, HAXPES and SEM measurements for the physico-chemical characterization of sterilized nanoparticles is presented. The measurements are part of the H2020 project “NanoSolveIT”. Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles were provided by Promethean Particles and treated differently by project partners from the University of Birmingham (EMR identifiers in the project: ERM00000410, ERM00000452, ERM00000431). The particles were treated by different sterilization methods (autoclave or microwave) and BSA was or was not added as stabilizer. This finally leads to five different samples: pristine, autoclave, microwave, autoclave with BSA, microwave with BSA. Prior to the measurements, the samples were prepared from the solution as drop cast on Si wafers. First SEM and EDS measurements were performed, followed by XPS and HAXPES measurements on the same samples. Here at first survey spectra were recorded followed by high resolution spectra. For XPS / HAXPES several Si-wafers were mounted together on one platen. The platen was left in the intro chamber of the instrument for several hours before the measurement started. Equipment: SEM images were acquired with a <em>Supra 40 </em>(Zeiss) SEM equipped with a <em>Quantax 400 </em>(Bruker) SDD EDS spectrometer. For X-ray spectroscopy experiments, a combined XPS / HAXPES spectrometer (<em>Quantes </em>from ULVAC-PHI) was used, where XPS is measured at 1486.6 eV (monochromatic Al Kα source) and HAXPES at 5414.9 eV (monochromatic Cr Kα source). Here it is possible to perform the measurements at the exact same position. Data: For SEM, the data are given in .tif format. For XPS / HAXPES the raw data are given as .spe (PHI format) and .npl (VAMAS format) files. The measurement conditions are given in the data files. Naming of data: SEM: <em>sample_treatment (n)</em>, with n a consecutive number. XPS / HAXPES: For the .spe files <em>Pn.m.o.sample_treatment</em> and for the corresponding .npl files: <em>m.npl</em> with Pn: platen-number, m: spectrum number (order of the measurements); o: point-number, of the position on the sample, sample_treatment with "m" for microwave and "a" for autoclave. The authors thank Sigrid Benemann, who performed the SEM measurements.