cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964444
title: Table S8 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans.

description: Assembly statistics for AHE sequencing, and exon-based loci sequenced for each species. For each locus, 1 represents presence and 0 represents absence in the main data matrix.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964456.v2
title: Table S7 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans.

description: Formatted list of node calibration priors.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964456.v1
title: Table S7 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans

description: Formatted list of node calibration priors.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964468
title: Table S5 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans.

description: Brief description of enrichment kits for each of six selected major lineages (Achelata, Anomura, Astacidea, Brachyura, Caridea, and Dendrobranchiata).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964444.v2
title: Table S8 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans.

description: Assembly statistics for AHE sequencing, and exon-based loci sequenced for each species. For each locus, 1 represents presence and 0 represents absence in the main data matrix.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964465
title: Table S6 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans.

description: Sample information for AHE sequencing, including SRA accession information.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964444.v1
title: Table S8 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans

description: Assembly statistics for AHE sequencing, and exon-based loci sequenced for each species. For each locus, 1 represents presence and 0 represents absence in the main data matrix.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964468.v2
title: Table S5 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans.

description: Brief description of enrichment kits for each of six selected major lineages (Achelata, Anomura, Astacidea, Brachyura, Caridea, and Dendrobranchiata).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964465.v2
title: Table S6 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans.

description: Sample information for AHE sequencing, including SRA accession information.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964459
title: Table S3 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans.

description: Sample information for transcriptome sequencing, including SRA accession information.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964468.v1
title: Table S5 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans

description: Brief description of enrichment kits for each of six selected major lineages (Achelata, Anomura, Astacidea, Brachyura, Caridea, and Dendrobranchiata).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964447
title: Table S4 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans.

description: Assembly statistics for transcriptome sequencing.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964465.v1
title: Table S6 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans

description: Sample information for AHE sequencing, including SRA accession information.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964459.v2
title: Table S3 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans.

description: Sample information for transcriptome sequencing, including SRA accession information.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964450
title: Table S1 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans.

description: Details of all transcriptome and genome sequences used in probe design.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964447.v2
title: Table S4 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans.

description: Assembly statistics for transcriptome sequencing.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964453
title: Table S2 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans.

description: Sample information for whole genome sequencing, including SRA accession information.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964459.v1
title: Table S3 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans

description: Sample information for transcriptome sequencing, including SRA accession information.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964450.v2
title: Table S1 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans.

description: Details of all transcriptome and genome sequences used in probe design.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964447.v1
title: Table S4 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans

description: Assembly statistics for transcriptome sequencing.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964450.v1
title: Table S1 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans

description: Details of all transcriptome and genome sequences used in probe design.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964453.v2
title: Table S2 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans.

description: Sample information for whole genome sequencing, including SRA accession information.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7964453.v1
title: Table S2 from A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans

description: Sample information for whole genome sequencing, including SRA accession information.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7965035
title: Data supporting Table S3 and Figure S3 from Reciprocal abundance shifts of the intertidal sea stars, <i>Evasterias troschelii</i> and <i>Pisaster ochraceus</i>, following sea star wasting disease.

description: Change in wet weight (grams) across competition treatments, from all three experiment rounds. See methods section 2.4 for more details. Competition treatments are labeled by the number of sea stars held in a tank, and of what species (‘treatment’). Evasterias is abbreviated with “Eva” and Pisaster is abbreviated with “Pi”. The interspecific treatment for Evasterias was “2 Eva (+2 Pi)” and for Pisaster was “2 Pi (+2 Eva)”. For each experiment (‘experiment’, 1:3), and tank (‘tank’, 1:15), we provide information on the species whose growth was measured (‘species’, either ‘Pisaster’ or ‘Evasterias’), the initial length of their arm from the central disc to the tip of the longest arm (arm_length), the starting weight at the beginning of the experiment (‘start_weight’, grams), the weight at the end of the experiment (‘end_weight’, grams), the calculated change in weight for each individual (‘change_weight’, grams), and the percentage change in weight over the experiment (‘percent_change’).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7965038
title: Data supporting Figure S4 from Reciprocal abundance shifts of the intertidal sea stars, <i>Evasterias troschelii</i> and <i>Pisaster ochraceus</i>, following sea star wasting disease.

description: Seasonal abundance data for Pisaster and Evasterias for April 2016 to March 2017. Mean percent of maximum abundance (top) and mean proportion of species in community (bottom), over the months of one year.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7965035.v2
title: Data supporting Table S3 and Figure S3 from Reciprocal abundance shifts of the intertidal sea stars, <i>Evasterias troschelii</i> and <i>Pisaster ochraceus</i>, following sea star wasting disease.

description: Change in wet weight (grams) across competition treatments, from all three experiment rounds. See methods section 2.4 for more details. Competition treatments are labeled by the number of sea stars held in a tank, and of what species (‘treatment’). Evasterias is abbreviated with “Eva” and Pisaster is abbreviated with “Pi”. The interspecific treatment for Evasterias was “2 Eva (+2 Pi)” and for Pisaster was “2 Pi (+2 Eva)”. For each experiment (‘experiment’, 1:3), and tank (‘tank’, 1:15), we provide information on the species whose growth was measured (‘species’, either ‘Pisaster’ or ‘Evasterias’), the initial length of their arm from the central disc to the tip of the longest arm (arm_length), the starting weight at the beginning of the experiment (‘start_weight’, grams), the weight at the end of the experiment (‘end_weight’, grams), the calculated change in weight for each individual (‘change_weight’, grams), and the percentage change in weight over the experiment (‘percent_change’).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7965041
title: Data supporting Table 2 and Figure 1 from Reciprocal abundance shifts of the intertidal sea stars, <i>Evasterias troschelii</i> and <i>Pisaster ochraceus</i>, following sea star wasting disease.

description: Long term Evasterias and Pisaster winter population data from 2008 to 2017. The number of surveys varies across years where n = 3 surveys for 2008, n = 2 surveys for the years for 2009, 2010, 2011, n = 4 surveys for 2013, n = 5 surveys for 2015, 2016, and n = 30 surveys for 2017. We provide information on the timing of the survey (‘date’, ‘month’, ‘year’, ‘season’), the timing relative to the SSWD outbreak (‘wasting’, with ‘pre’ being before wasting and ‘post’ being after wasting), the location of the survey (‘site’), opportunistic measurements of salinity during the survey (‘salinity’), the species quantified (‘species’, either ‘Pisaster’ or ‘Evasterias’), the abundance of that species (‘abundance’), the proportion of each species relative to the other (‘prop_sp’) and the percent of the maximum abundance within species over time (‘percent_max’). See the methods section 2.1 for further details.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7965032
title: Data supporting Table 3 and Figure 2 from Reciprocal abundance shifts of the intertidal sea stars, <i>Evasterias troschelii</i> and <i>Pisaster ochraceus</i>, following sea star wasting disease.

description: Days to expressing disease and mortality for Evasterias and Pisaster over 28 days. Description of experimental set up can be found in methods section 2.2. For each tank (‘tank’, 1:10), we provide information on the day of monitoring (‘day’, 1:27), the species (‘species’, either ‘Pisaster’ or ‘Evasterias’), the percentage that remained visibly uninfected (‘percent_healthy) or dead (percent_dead), the number remaining uninfected (‘num_healthy’, 0:5), alive (‘num_alive’), or dead (num_dead), and the number showing disease symptoms (‘num_sick’, 0:5) on a given day. To complete survival analysis we report the census data for day of first disease symptom (‘census_sick’) and day or mortality (‘census_dead’).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7965035.v1
title: Data supporting Table S3 and Figure S3 from Reciprocal abundance shifts of the intertidal sea stars, <i>Evasterias troschelii</i> and <i>Pisaster ochraceus</i>, following sea star wasting disease

description: Change in wet weight (grams) across competition treatments, from all three experiment rounds. See methods section 2.4 for more details. Competition treatments are labeled by the number of sea stars held in a tank, and of what species (‘treatment’). Evasterias is abbreviated with “Eva” and Pisaster is abbreviated with “Pi”. The interspecific treatment for Evasterias was “2 Eva (+2 Pi)” and for Pisaster was “2 Pi (+2 Eva)”. For each experiment (‘experiment’, 1:3), and tank (‘tank’, 1:15), we provide information on the species whose growth was measured (‘species’, either ‘Pisaster’ or ‘Evasterias’), the initial length of their arm from the central disc to the tip of the longest arm (arm_length), the starting weight at the beginning of the experiment (‘start_weight’, grams), the weight at the end of the experiment (‘end_weight’, grams), the calculated change in weight for each individual (‘change_weight’, grams), and the percentage change in weight over the experiment (‘percent_change’).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7965038.v2
title: Data supporting Figure S4 from Reciprocal abundance shifts of the intertidal sea stars, <i>Evasterias troschelii</i> and <i>Pisaster ochraceus</i>, following sea star wasting disease.

description: Seasonal abundance data for Pisaster and Evasterias for April 2016 to March 2017. Mean percent of maximum abundance (top) and mean proportion of species in community (bottom), over the months of one year.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7965041.v2
title: Data supporting Table 2 and Figure 1 from Reciprocal abundance shifts of the intertidal sea stars, <i>Evasterias troschelii</i> and <i>Pisaster ochraceus</i>, following sea star wasting disease.

description: Long term Evasterias and Pisaster winter population data from 2008 to 2017. The number of surveys varies across years where n = 3 surveys for 2008, n = 2 surveys for the years for 2009, 2010, 2011, n = 4 surveys for 2013, n = 5 surveys for 2015, 2016, and n = 30 surveys for 2017. We provide information on the timing of the survey (‘date’, ‘month’, ‘year’, ‘season’), the timing relative to the SSWD outbreak (‘wasting’, with ‘pre’ being before wasting and ‘post’ being after wasting), the location of the survey (‘site’), opportunistic measurements of salinity during the survey (‘salinity’), the species quantified (‘species’, either ‘Pisaster’ or ‘Evasterias’), the abundance of that species (‘abundance’), the proportion of each species relative to the other (‘prop_sp’) and the percent of the maximum abundance within species over time (‘percent_max’). See the methods section 2.1 for further details.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7965038.v1
title: Data supporting Figure S4 from Reciprocal abundance shifts of the intertidal sea stars, <i>Evasterias troschelii</i> and <i>Pisaster ochraceus</i>, following sea star wasting disease

description: Seasonal abundance data for Pisaster and Evasterias for April 2016 to March 2017. Mean percent of maximum abundance (top) and mean proportion of species in community (bottom), over the months of one year.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7965041.v1
title: Data supporting Table 2 and Figure 1 from Reciprocal abundance shifts of the intertidal sea stars, <i>Evasterias troschelii</i> and <i>Pisaster ochraceus</i>, following sea star wasting disease

description: Long term Evasterias and Pisaster winter population data from 2008 to 2017. The number of surveys varies across years where n = 3 surveys for 2008, n = 2 surveys for the years for 2009, 2010, 2011, n = 4 surveys for 2013, n = 5 surveys for 2015, 2016, and n = 30 surveys for 2017. We provide information on the timing of the survey (‘date’, ‘month’, ‘year’, ‘season’), the timing relative to the SSWD outbreak (‘wasting’, with ‘pre’ being before wasting and ‘post’ being after wasting), the location of the survey (‘site’), opportunistic measurements of salinity during the survey (‘salinity’), the species quantified (‘species’, either ‘Pisaster’ or ‘Evasterias’), the abundance of that species (‘abundance’), the proportion of each species relative to the other (‘prop_sp’) and the percent of the maximum abundance within species over time (‘percent_max’). See the methods section 2.1 for further details.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7965032.v2
title: Data supporting Table 3 and Figure 2 from Reciprocal abundance shifts of the intertidal sea stars, <i>Evasterias troschelii</i> and <i>Pisaster ochraceus</i>, following sea star wasting disease.

description: Days to expressing disease and mortality for Evasterias and Pisaster over 28 days. Description of experimental set up can be found in methods section 2.2. For each tank (‘tank’, 1:10), we provide information on the day of monitoring (‘day’, 1:27), the species (‘species’, either ‘Pisaster’ or ‘Evasterias’), the percentage that remained visibly uninfected (‘percent_healthy) or dead (percent_dead), the number remaining uninfected (‘num_healthy’, 0:5), alive (‘num_alive’), or dead (num_dead), and the number showing disease symptoms (‘num_sick’, 0:5) on a given day. To complete survival analysis we report the census data for day of first disease symptom (‘census_sick’) and day or mortality (‘census_dead’).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7965032.v1
title: Data supporting Table 3 and Figure 2 from Reciprocal abundance shifts of the intertidal sea stars, <i>Evasterias troschelii</i> and <i>Pisaster ochraceus</i>, following sea star wasting disease

description: Days to expressing disease and mortality for Evasterias and Pisaster over 28 days. Description of experimental set up can be found in methods section 2.2. For each tank (‘tank’, 1:10), we provide information on the day of monitoring (‘day’, 1:27), the species (‘species’, either ‘Pisaster’ or ‘Evasterias’), the percentage that remained visibly uninfected (‘percent_healthy) or dead (percent_dead), the number remaining uninfected (‘num_healthy’, 0:5), alive (‘num_alive’), or dead (num_dead), and the number showing disease symptoms (‘num_sick’, 0:5) on a given day. To complete survival analysis we report the census data for day of first disease symptom (‘census_sick’) and day or mortality (‘census_dead’).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7965377
title: Supplementary Material 3 from Coupling of palaeontological and neontological reef coral data improves forecasts of biodiversity responses under global climatic change.

description: Sum of cells within 5° latitudinal bins for all model classes, binary thresholds and climate scenarios.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7965371
title: Supplementary Material 1 from Coupling of palaeontological and neontological reef coral data improves forecasts of biodiversity responses under global climatic change.

description: Occurrence data for modern and LIG reef corals, as well as the training data for ecological niche modelling. Training data is subsampled to 1.25° x 1.25° and clipped to cells with available environmental data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7965377.v2
title: Supplementary Material 3 from Coupling of palaeontological and neontological reef coral data improves forecasts of biodiversity responses under global climatic change.

description: Sum of cells within 5° latitudinal bins for all model classes, binary thresholds and climate scenarios.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7965371.v2
title: Supplementary Material 1 from Coupling of palaeontological and neontological reef coral data improves forecasts of biodiversity responses under global climatic change.

description: Occurrence data for modern and LIG reef corals, as well as the training data for ecological niche modelling. Training data is subsampled to 1.25° x 1.25° and clipped to cells with available environmental data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7965371.v1
title: Supplementary Material 1 from Coupling of palaeontological and neontological reef coral data improve forecasts of biodiversity responses under global climatic change

description: Occurrence data for modern and LIG reef corals, as well as the training data for ecological niche modelling. Training data is subsampled to 1.25° x 1.25° and clipped to cells with available environmental data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7965377.v1
title: Supplementary Material 3 from Coupling of palaeontological and neontological reef coral data improve forecasts of biodiversity responses under global climatic change

description: Sum of cells within 5° latitudinal bins for all model classes, binary thresholds and climate scenarios.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7969802
title: Supplementary Tables from Genes, geology and germs: gut microbiota across a primate hybrid zone are explained by site soil properties, not host species.

description: This file contains all supplementary tables.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7969802.v1
title: Grieneisen_etal_SupplementaryTables from Genes, geology and germs: gut microbiota across a primate hybrid zone are explained by site soil properties, not host species

description: This file contains all supplementary tables.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7976840
title: Animator for the local attraction model from Asynchrony induces polarization in attraction-based models of collective motion.

description: Matlab function for animating the 2D local attraction model on a periodic LxL square with N particles, of which Na update asynchronously and N-Na update synchronously, for T time steps with relative strength of local attraction c. To run the animator download the file codeS2.m, open Matlab, set current directory to where codeS2.m is located, and then run the command codeS2(L,N,Na,T,c,K) from the command line with all parameters specified. In addition to the five parameters L,N,Na,T and c specified above the parameter K specifies how often a frame will be captured for the animation. For example, if K=1 all simulation steps will be animated, if K=100 every 100th simulation step will be animated. Examples: One Swarm: codeS2(10,50,50,100,2,1) (Potentially) several swarms: codeS2(50,100,100,600,2,1) One Mill: codeS2(10,50,50,100,1,1) (Potentially) several Mills: codeS2(50,100,100,600,0.5,1) One Polarised group: codeS2(10,50,50,2000,0.15,10) (Potentially) several Polarised Groups: codeS2(50,100,100,4000,0.15,10) ! Note that K=10 here, so only every 10th frame is included in the animation, set K=1 to include every time step.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7976840.v2
title: Animator for the local attraction model from Asynchrony induces polarization in attraction-based models of collective motion.

description: Matlab function for animating the 2D local attraction model on a periodic LxL square with N particles, of which Na update asynchronously and N-Na update synchronously, for T time steps with relative strength of local attraction c. To run the animator download the file codeS2.m, open Matlab, set current directory to where codeS2.m is located, and then run the command codeS2(L,N,Na,T,c,K) from the command line with all parameters specified. In addition to the five parameters L,N,Na,T and c specified above the parameter K specifies how often a frame will be captured for the animation. For example, if K=1 all simulation steps will be animated, if K=100 every 100th simulation step will be animated. Examples: One Swarm: codeS2(10,50,50,100,2,1) (Potentially) several swarms: codeS2(50,100,100,600,2,1) One Mill: codeS2(10,50,50,100,1,1) (Potentially) several Mills: codeS2(50,100,100,600,0.5,1) One Polarised group: codeS2(10,50,50,2000,0.15,10) (Potentially) several Polarised Groups: codeS2(50,100,100,4000,0.15,10) ! Note that K=10 here, so only every 10th frame is included in the animation, set K=1 to include every time step.