cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/krn6tb
title: Replication Data for: Keeping or Building Peace? UN Peace Operations Beyond the Security Dilemma

description: One of the most consistent findings on UN peace operations (UNPOs) is that they contribute to peace. Existing scholarship argues this is because UNPO peacekeeping troops solve the security dilemma that inhibits combatant disarmament and prevents their political leaders from sharing power. We argue that existing scholarship's focus on peacekeeping troops overlooks UNPOs' role in enabling power-sharing governments to implement redistributive power-sharing reforms contained in peace agreements, and their broader peace processes. While peacekeeping troops can help belligerents refrain from violence, military force alone cannot explain how political elites implement redistributive reforms that threaten their status. We argue that UNPOs that have predominant peacebuilding (as opposed to peacekeeping) mandates help sustain political elites' commitment to implementing peace agreement reforms and, thus, contribute to inclusive peace (increased political inclusion and reduced violence). We test our argument using a dataset on UNPO mandates and original fieldwork on three sequential UNPOs in Burundi.
description: This dataset underwent an independent verification process that replicated the tables and figures in the primary article. For the supplementary materials, verification was performed solely for the successful execution of code. The verification process was carried out by the Odum Institute for Research in Social Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 
<br>
The associated article has been awarded Open Materials and Open Data Badges. Learn more about the Open Practice Badges from the Center for Open Science.<br>
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/mkhcks
title: Replication Data for: Dataset "P3Numbers_20141124_m_14_004" available at http://eegdatabase.kiv.zcu.cz/experiments-detail?DEFAULT_PARAM_ID=532

description: Guess the number is a simple P300-based brain-computer interface experiment. Its aim is to ask the measured participant to pick a number between 1 and 9. Then, he or she is exposed to corresponding visual stimuli and experimenters try to guess the number thought while observing event-related potential waveforms on-line. 250 school-age children participated in the experiments that were carried out in elementary and secondary schools in the Czech Republic. Electroencephalographic data from three EEG channels (Fz, Cz, Pz) and stimuli markers were stored. Additional metadata about the participants were collected (gender, age, the number thought by the participant, the guess of the experimenters, and various interesting additional information). The data are stored in the Brain Vision format.
description: Presentation, 18.1
description: Brain Vision Recorder, 1.20.0001
description: All data and metadata in this dataverse can be downloaded as an experimental package named "PROJECT DAYS P3 NUMBERS" that is available at https://eegdatabase.kiv.zcu.cz in section "All experiments"
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/mkilqp
title: KPC June 2000

description: Kibale Party Composition files from 2000-06-01 to 2000-06-31 include 52 files. Access to these files is restricted. Please contact Dr. Zarin Machanda (machanda@fas.harvard.edu) for permission.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/r3dha5
title: Replication Data for: Raw data Norwegian Claim Study_2019

description: Raw data Norwegian Claim Study_2019
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/rt8chm
title: Replication Data for: Firms and Global Value Chains: Identifying Firms’ Multidimensional Trade Preferences

description: Trade policy has become increasingly multidimensional. Current trade agreements not only address market access but also encompass rules and provisions related to flexibility of commitment, investment protection, and dispute settlement mechanisms. Yet, rigorous evidence about how interest groups evaluate each of these in relation to the others remains scarce. We develop a firm-level theoretical framework to explain how firms’ international operations affect their preferences on different trade policy measures. We experimentally evaluate preferences over multiple policy dimensions using a conjoint analysis on firms in Costa Rica. Notably, for many types of firms, the standard trade policy measures of yesteryear—tariffs and subsidies—are no longer their most important concerns. Instead, the degree of firms’ involvement in global value chains shapes their preferences. Multinational corporations care most about protection of their foreign investments. Those exporters who are not central to global supply networks most value strong dispute settlement procedures. Finally, we find that preferences over these policy dimensions are more likely to vary by firm than by industry, which calls into question the existing literature's focus on interindustry distinctions.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/x9kzkl
title: Replication Data for: 'The Impact of Public School Choice: Evidence from Los Angeles's Zones of Choice'

description: The data and programs replicate tables and figures from "The Impact of Public School Choice: Evidence from Los Angeles's Zones of Choice", by Campos and Kearns. Please see the README file for additional details.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/xrcmco
title: A13_25254.jpg

description: Link to OCHRE database: &lt;a href = 'http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/ba7aeb3b-d526-4ded-b7fb-c1821162a553'&gt;http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/ba7aeb3b-d526-4ded-b7fb-c1821162a553
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/yw4wit
title: Impact Evaluation of Cash, Food Vouchers, and Food Transfers among Colombian Refugees and Poor Ecuadorians in Carchi and Sucumbios: Baseline Survey

description: &lt;p&gt;In April 2011, the World Food Program (WFP) expanded its assistance to address the food security and nutrition needs of Colombian refugees and to support their integration into Ecuadorian communities. The new program was designed as a prospective randomized control trial and consisted of six monthly transfers of cash, food vouchers, or food to Colombian refugees and poor Ecuadorian households. The objectives of the program were three-fold: 1) to improve food consumption by facilitating access to more nutritious foods, 2) to increase the role of women in household decision-making related to food consumption, and 3) to reduce tensions between Colombian refugees and host Ecuadorian populations. The program was implemented in seven urban centers in the provinces of Carchi and Sucumbíos.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;IFPRI conducted an impact evaluation targeted at estimating the relative impact and cost-effectiveness of cash, food vouchers, and food transfers on household food security indicators; as well as complimentary indicators such as household expenditure and female status.&lt;/p&gt;
description: Household- and Community-level Surveys
description: STATA, 13
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15584523
title: Simulation outputs - Growth dynamics of the infty-parent SLFV process
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15584524
title: Simulation outputs - Growth dynamics of the infty-parent SLFV process
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ogltai
title: A14_27093.jpg

description: Link to OCHRE database: &lt;a href = 'http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/4ac0c709-6ac5-41f0-b228-2e2a01f2aa44'&gt;http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/org/ochre/4ac0c709-6ac5-41f0-b228-2e2a01f2aa44
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/rtviem
title: VPAL Data Documentation

description: Documentation Files explaining:
Harvard VPAL Research Data Documentation
Harvard VPAL Private Datasets
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/wutpkg
title: Worker Representation and Participation Survey (WRPS), Wave2, 1995

description: The Wave 2 survey consisted of re-interviews of 801 participants in Wave 1. It was supported by various written materials, sent to all of the roughly 1400 participants in Wave 1 who there agreed to participate in Wave 2 and read those materials in advance. Telephone re-interviews were conducted between December 6, 1994 and January 24, 1995. Potential Wave 2 respondents were randomly divided into four subsets. Two of these received the material on arbitration, with one having its possible advantages listed first, the other with disadvantages listed first. The other two received the material on workplace regulatory committees, again with one getting advantages listed before disadvantages, and the other the reverse.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/wvdyzw
title: Autonomous and Ultrasensitive Low-Power Metal Oxide Nanofiber Gas Sensor for Source Tracking and Localization

description: mode=1 is gas source tracking, mode=2 is gas source localization.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/clbkzj
title: Replication Data for: "Civil–Military Relations and Civil War Recurrence: Security Forces in Postwar Politics"

description: Dataset and replication code for all analyses in article as published in JCR.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/fzihmb
title: Counting essential surfaces in 3-manifolds

description: Code and data to accompany the paper of the same name by N. M. Dunfield, S. Garoufalidis, and J. H. Rubinstein.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/gzhukp
title: Replication Data for: Survey template on Community-Based Resource Management (CBRM) study
title: An annex to: Johnson AF, Kleiber D, Gomese C, Sukulu M, Saeni-Oeta J, Giron-Nava A, Cohen PJ and McDougall CL. 2021. Assessing inclusion in community-based resource management: A framework and methodology. Penang, Malaysia: CGIAR Research Program on Fish Agri-Food Systems. Manual: FISH-2021-21

description: The framework and methodology will be of particular interest to data- and evidence-oriented agencies and actors who have a commitment to inclusion, gender equity, and fair management and governance. As well as enabling these agencies and actors to strengthen their own programs and projects and the CBNRM policies they inform, the frameworks, methods and insights may be of interest to communities and CBNRM groups themselves as governance actors, co-researchers and owners of CBNRM processes. 

The methodology is a sequential mixed methods approach comprising three main methods: semistructured interviews, a quantitative survey and two forms of FGDs (one conducted before and the other after the interviews and surveys). Each method supports a different purpose, generated a different type of information and requires a different analytical approach.

Each method also offers a different opportunity to explore inclusion and exclusion. The formats of the methods we provide here are those that we refined and adjusted for the Solomon Islands context. We encourage you to adjust and adapt the questions, methods, and sampling strategies to suit your objectives and contexts.

The data contained here in came from a national wide survey of fishing communities in Solomon Islands.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/j8iwjc
title: Replication Data for: Watch the target! Effects in the affective misattribution procedure become weaker (but not eliminated) when participants are motivated to provide accurate responses to the target. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1442 (2015).

description: raw data
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/xegdly
title: AfricaRice workflow for dataset submission

description: Activities have been conducted to ensure AfricaRice research data are properly stored for institutional memory. To ease data gathering from AfricaRice Scientists, new workflow and standardized templates for primary data and metadata submission have been adopted.
DOI: 10.25921/mf5h-4766
title: Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC), carbon isotopes and other parameters collected from platform ANA06B in Amundsen Sea, Southern Ocean, South Pacific Ocean from 2016-01-15 to 2016-01-18 (NCEI Accession 0254767)

description: This dataset contains dissolved organic carbon (DOC) carbon isotopes and other data collected near the Dotson Ice Shelf during Amundsen project cruise from 2016-01-15 to 2016-01-18 by scientists of Korea Polar Research Institute (KOPRI). DOC concentration obtained with TOC analyzer and carbon isotopic composition were measured with accelerator mass spectrometer. This dataset also compiled all available radiocarbon (14C) data from sinking and suspended particulate organic carbon (POC), sedimentary organic carbon (SOC), and DOC from the Amundsen Sea.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/976did
title: Database of Indian Prime Ministers’ Speeches (addendum: ml-generated translations)

description: Child dataset of the "Database of Indian Prime Ministers’ Speeches." Contrains Google translations of speeches that were not manually translated.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/krpr8c
title: Replication data for: "Does Partisanship Really Matter for the Provision of Welfare Policies?"

description: This paper examines and applies of more advanced modeling methods for the time-series-cross-sectional data by replicating the article by Huo et al. (2008). We make a claim that the original article’s causal inference is problematic without taking consideration of country-level heterogeneity, even though we agree their defense of not using country dummies: They absorbs the most of variances in the time-invariant or slowly changing factors which are common in institutional analysis, and thus analysts are not able to estimate cross-sectional variances which are great interests of comparative political studies. Therefore, we propose and apply more advanced method actively measuring cross-country variances. Followed by Beck and Katz (2007) we estimated random coefficient model (RCM) with most typical TSCS data in comparative political studies. By examining a variety of aspects of RCM, we find evidences that the main theoretical arguments in Huo et al. (2008) are not supported.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/ladkqn
title: Replication Data for: Dataset "P3Numbers_20150618_f_11_004" available at http://eegdatabase.kiv.zcu.cz/experiments-detail?DEFAULT_PARAM_ID=347

description: Guess the number is a simple P300-based brain-computer interface experiment. Its aim is to ask the measured participant to pick a number between 1 and 9. Then, he or she is exposed to corresponding visual stimuli and experimenters try to guess the number thought while observing event-related potential waveforms on-line. 250 school-age children participated in the experiments that were carried out in elementary and secondary schools in the Czech Republic. Electroencephalographic data from three EEG channels (Fz, Cz, Pz) and stimuli markers were stored. Additional metadata about the participants were collected (gender, age, the number thought by the participant, the guess of the experimenters, and various interesting additional information). The data are stored in the Brain Vision format.
description: Presentation, 18.1
description: Brain Vision Recorder, 1.20.0001
description: All data and metadata in this dataverse can be downloaded as an experimental package named "PROJECT DAYS P3 NUMBERS" that is available at https://eegdatabase.kiv.zcu.cz in section "All experiments"
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/lflcma
title: Replication Data for: Sleeping with the Enemy: Effective Representation Under Dynamic Electoral Competition

description: Electoral coalitions between ideologically incompatible parties---among other unconventional electoral strategies---may seem to threaten effective representation, signaling a breakdown of programmatic politics. However, this perspective overlooks parties' and voters' dynamic considerations. We propose and estimate a model of dynamic electoral competition in which a short-term ideology compromise, via an electoral coalition, offers opposition parties (and voters) the opportunity to remove an entrenched incumbent party from office, thus leveling the playing field in the future. This tradeoff provides a previously unrecognized rationale for coalition formation in elections. We take our model to data from Mexican municipal elections between 1995-2016 and show that coalitions between parties on opposite ends of the ideology spectrum have served as an instrument of democratic consolidation.
description: This dataset underwent an independent verification process that replicated the tables and figures in the primary article. For the supplementary materials, verification was performed solely for the successful execution of code. The verification process was carried out by the Odum Institute for Research in Social Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
<br>
The associated article has been awarded Open Materials and Open Data Badges. Learn more about the Open Practice Badges from the Center for Open Science.<br>
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/fwql0w
title: SUH Demand

description: Causes of urgent medical attention
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/o4wc1n
title: Replication Data for: "Do Authoritarians Vote for Authoritarians? Evidence from Latin America"

description: This is the replication Stata code and log file for the publication "Do Authoritarians Vote for Authoritarians? Evidence from Latin America," by Mollie Cohen and Amy Erica Smith. The analysis uses the AmericasBarometer 2012 merged data set (AmericasBarometer Merged 2012 v50.0 English.dta), which may be obtained from www.americasbarometer.org.
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/wummpi
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1860, leave to withdraw, SC1/series 231, Petition of Eben Howes

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Against slave hunting &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858714"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858714&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Dennis &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: James S. Howes, Dennis; committee on federal relations &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Eben Howes&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Dean Sears&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Joshua Hall&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1860-02-09 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on February 9, 1860 and referred to the committee on federal relations and sent for concurrence &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 82 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent for concurrence &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 44 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 34 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Unidentified signatures: 4 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: citizens, [females], ["others"] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Signatory column format: not column separated &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1860, leave to withdraw &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/xqqcaj
title: Massachusetts Archives Collection. v.30-Indian, 1603-1705. SC1/series 45X, Petition of Jeremiah Belcher

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: Court cases &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13906001"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13906001&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: 16540000 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Jeremiah Belcher&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1654-11-06 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Voted by the magistrates to abate fine on November 6, 1654 and confirmed by the deputies &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Voted, confirmed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 1 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: No &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Manuscript &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional archivist notes: liquor &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Massachusetts Archives volume 30, pages 70-70b &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/xrbkey
title: ANÁLISE DE DADOS – UFPE 2018 – TRABALHO FINAL – JOSÉ MATHEUS MEDEIROS

description: Entrega Final
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/akksf
title: Senate Unpassed Legislation 1855, Docket 18373, SC1/series 231, Petition of Mrs. William Ashby

description: &lt;p&gt;Petition subject: For the removal of Edward Greeley Loring &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Original: &lt;a href="http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858601"&gt;http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858601&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Date of creation: (unknown) &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Petition location: Newburyport &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Paul Townsend, West Bridgewater; committee on federal relations; Mrs. William Ashby, Newburyport, Mass. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Selected signatures:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Mrs. William Ashby&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Lydia G. Putnam&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Jane Knapp&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Actions taken on dates: 1855-02-08,1855-02-09 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action: Received in the House on February 8, 1855 and referred to the committee on federal relations and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on February 9, 1855 and concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Total signatures: 23 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female signatures: 23 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Female only signatures: Yes &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Identifications of signatories: women, [females] &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Prayer format was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printing"&gt;printed&lt;/a&gt; vs. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuscript"&gt;manuscript&lt;/a&gt;: Printed &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1855, Docket 18373 &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.&lt;/p&gt;