DOI: 10.5061/dryad.3tf4mt4
title: Data from: Synthesizing the effects of large, wild herbivore exclusion on ecosystem function

description: 1. Wild large herbivores are declining worldwide. Despite extensive use of
 exclosure experiments to investigate herbivore impacts, there is little
 consensus on the effects of wild large herbivores on ecosystem function.
 2. Of the ecosystem functions likely impacted, we reviewed the five
 most-studied in exclosure experiments: ecosystem resilience/resistance to
 disturbance, nutrient cycling, carbon cycling, plant regeneration, and
 primary productivity. 3. Experimental data on large wild herbivores’
 effects on ecosystem functions were predominately derived from temperate
 grasslands (50% grasslands, 75% temperate zones), and experiments that may
 not be of adequate size (median size 400m2 despite excluding all
 experiments below 25m2) or duration (median duration 6 years) to capture
 ecosystem-scale responses to these low-density and wide-ranging taxa. 4.
 Wild herbivore removal frequently impacted ecosystem functions; for
 example, net carbon uptake increased by three times in some instances.
 However, the magnitude and direction of effects, even within a single
 function, were highly variable. 5. A focus on carbon cycling highlighted
 challenges in interpreting effects on a single function. While the effect
 of large herbivore exclusion on carbon cycling was slightly positive when
 its components (e.g. pools vs. fluxes of carbon) were aggregated, effects
 on individual components were variable and sometimes opposed. 6. Given
 modern declines in large wild herbivores, it is critical to understand
 their effects on ecosystem function. However, this synthesis highlights
 strong variability in direction, magnitude, and modifiers of these
 effects. Some variation is likely due to disparity in what components are
 used to describe a given function. For example, for the carbon cycle we
 identified eight distinctly meaningful components, which are not easily
 combined yet are potentially misrepresentative of the larger cycle when
 considered alone. However, much of the observed difference in responses
 likely reflects real ecological variability across complex systems. 7. To
 move towards a general predictive framework we must identify where
 variation in effect is due to methodological differences and where due to
 ecosystem context. Two critical steps forward are 1) additional
 quantitative synthetic analyses of large herbivores’ effects on individual
 functions, and 2) improved, increased systematic exclosure research
 focusing on effects of large herbivores’ exclusion on functions.
description: Forbes_lgherbs_allfxn_review_finalThese data describe the functional responses of experimental large herbivore exclusion, collected from a Web Of Science search. The dataset includes functional responses on their own lines (e.g. multiple functional responses could be recorded at one site, within one publication), and includes information on: publication, exclosure experiment, and which ecosystem function was examined.Forbes_lgherbs_carbondat_review_finalThis dataset consists of carbon cycle responses to experimental large herbivore exclosure. Each line consists of a single component of the carbon cycle's response to exclosure (e.g. one study may examine multiple components of the carbon cycle), and includes data on that component before/after large herbivore exclosure, information on the experimental site, which component was being measured and how, and any metadata relevant to the response (e.g. large herbivore density) if reported.