cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6077/j5/ccatmf
title: Full and Part-time Employment by Major Industry, (CA25): Counties in the U.S., 1967-1999

description: &lt;p&gt;Table CA25 contains estimates of employment in Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Division (&quot;one-digit&quot;) detail. Employment is measured as the average annual number of jobs, full-time plus part-time; each job that a person holds is counted at full weight. The estimates are largely by place of work. The estimates are organized both by type— wage and salary employment and self-employment— and by industry. The series by industry is for the combination of the two types of employment. These employment estimates correspond closely to the earnings estimates presented in Table CA05; however, the earnings estimates include the income of limited partnerships and of tax-exempt cooperatives, for which there are no corresponding employment estimates. The source data for BEA's wage and salary employment estimates are mainly from the ES-202 series of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The ES-202 series provides monthly employment and quarterly wages for each State and county in SIC four-digit detail. BEA restricts its release of local area estimates of wage and salary employment to the SIC Division (&quot;one-digit&quot;) level because self-employment is estimated—- based mainly on data tabulated from individual and partnership Federal individual income tax returns—- at that level. The estimates are suppressed in many individual cases, using BLS primary and secondary suppressions, in order to preclude the disclosure of information about individual employers.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.6077/j5/wpons2
title: Equality of Education Opportunity (Coleman) Study (EEOS), 1966

description: &lt;p&gt;This study consist of test scores and questionnaire responses obtained from 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th grade students, as well as responses from teachers and principals. The sample was taken from the public schools in the United States and the District of Columbia. Tests were administered to determine ability and achievement in verbal skills, non-verbal associations, reading comprehension and mathematics. Questionnaires obtained information on age, sex, grade, race, ethnic identify, socio-economic background, attitudes toward learning, educational and career goals, racial attitudes, racial composition student and faculty groups, discipline, school environment, school facilities, salaries, and curriculum. The unit of observation is the individual respondent. The Educational Testing Service created these records for the Office of Education. James Coleman of Johns Hopkins University acted as a consultant to the Office of Education, so this study is frequently referred to as the Coleman study.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.6077/69e3-3m88
title: National Health Interview Survey, 1986

description: &lt;p&gt;The basic purpose of the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) is to obtain information about the amount and distribution of illness, its effects in terms of disability and chronic impairments, and the kinds of health services people receive. Household variables in this data collection include type of living quarters, size of family, number of families in household, and geographic region. Person variables include sex, age, race, marital status, veteran status, education, income, industry and occupation codes, and limits on activity. The Condition, Doctor Visit, and Hospital files contain information on each reported condition, two-week doctor visit, or hospitalization (twelve-month recall), respectively. Respondents for the Functional Limitations Supplement were persons age 65 and older. Questions concerned degree of difficulty in performing activities of daily living. For the Longest Job Worked Supplement, respondents were persons age 25 or older who had worked. Information obtained in this supplement determines the effects of a person's job on his or her health. Respondents for the Vitamin/Mineral Intake Supplement were sampled from those age 2-6 and those 18 or older. Proxies for the children and the adults themselves were asked questions to determine individual consumption of these nutrients and their effects on health. The Health and Dental Insurance Supplements include all the respondents, and have questions on Medicare and other types of health insurance coverage, reasons for visits to the dentist, use of fluorides, and other oral health practices. (Source: downloaded from ICPSR 7/13/10)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Please Note:&lt;/strong&gt; This dataset is part of the historical CISER Data Archive Collection and is also available at ICPSR -- &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08976.v3"&gt;https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08976.v3&lt;/a&gt;. We highly recommend using the ICPSR version as they made this dataset available in multiple data formats.&lt;/p&gt;
description: National Health Interview Survey, [Core Data]
description: collection_notes: The data collected in the NHIS are obtained through a complex sample design involving both clustering and stratification. Because of the complex design and the ratio adjustments applied to the sample weights, the direct application of standard statistical analysis methods for variance estimation and hypothesis testing may yield misleading results.
DOI: 10.6077/j5/axloss
title: National Income and Product Accounts, 1929-1986 (1982 dollars, December 1985 Revisions)

description: &lt;p&gt;The National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA) are produced by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. The NIPAs show the composition of production and the distribution of incomes earned in production. Thus, they represent a critical element of the U.S. economic accounts, which are designed to provide a consistent and comprehensive picture of the Nation’s economy. The NIPAs feature several widely followed measures of aggregate U.S. economic activity, including gross domestic product (GDP), gross domestic income (GDI), personal income, and personal saving among others. (A Guide to National Income and Product Accounts of the United States)&lt;/p&gt;
description: version_history: Version 3 - added converted csv data file and accompanying read me file. 6 AUG 2021 -jb
DOI: 10.6077/npzn-gf11
title: National Organization Study, 1991

description: &lt;p&gt;This study (also known as the National Organization Survey) is a representative sample of United States work organizations, with data from informants about human resources policies and practices. These files were obtained from the University of Minnesota, and include an SPSS dataset (in transport file format) and a codebook. [see also ORG-007 (1991A)].&lt;/p&gt;
description: collection_notes: Collection mode varied; most were completed by telephone but some were sent mailings upon request.
DOI: 10.6077/j5/c4djdw
title: National Socioeconomic Survey - SUSENAS [Indonesia], 2007-2010; 2015

description: &lt;p&gt;&quot;The National Socioeconomic Survey (SUSENAS) is a series of large-scale multi-purpose socioeconomic surveys initiated in 1963-1964 and fielded every year or two since then. Since 1993, SUSENAS surveys cover a nationally representative sample typically composed of 200,000 households. Each survey contains a core questionnaire which consists of a household roster listing the sex, age, marital status, and educational attainment of all household members, supplemented by modules covering about 60,000 households that are rotated over time to collection additional information such as health care and nutrition, household income and expenditure, and labor force experience.&quot; [Source: http://www.rand.org/labor/bps/susenas.html]&lt;/p&gt;
description: National Socioeconomic Survey - SUSENAS
DOI: 10.6077/j5/vnje15
title: Merit Principles Survey, 2000

description: &lt;p&gt;The Merit Principles Survey was conducted by the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board in early 1996 to assess Federal employees' views of their jobs and work environment. Though the focus of the survey (and some of the questions) change with each administration, the survey contains many items that can serve as a basis for tracking perceptions and experiences of Federal employees and managers over time. A total of 18,163 surveys were distributed and 9,710 surveys were completed and returned. The survey covers attitudes toward federal merit principles, the effects of downsizing, and other topics.&lt;/p&gt;
description: Merit Principles Survey
description: collection_notes: The sampling plan was stratified by the major large Federal executive branch agencies to help ensure that there would be sufficient numbers of respondents from each agency to permit agency-level comparisons.
DOI: 10.6077/j5/cbbxex
title: Census of Population and Housing, 1990: Summary Tape File 1B, New York State

description: &lt;p&gt;This collection provides 100-percent data for states and their subareas in hierarchical sequence down to the block level. Also included are complete summaries for places, census tract/block numbering areas, block groups, consolidated cities, Alaska Native Regional Corporation, state portion of Metropolitan Statistical Area/Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA/CMSA), and state portion of Urbanized Area. Population items include age, race, sex, marital status, Hispanic origin, household type, and household relationship. Population items are crosstabulated by age, race, Hispanic origin, or sex. Housing items include occupancy/vacancy status, tenure, units in structure, contract rent, meals included in rent, value, and number of rooms in housing unit. Housing data are crosstabulated by race or Hispanic origin of householder or by tenure. Selected aggregates and medians are also provided. Data are presented in 37 population tables and 63 housing tables. (Source: ICPSR 06/15/2011)&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.6077/j5/x6t6i9
title: Federal Human Capital Survey, 2004

description: &lt;p&gt;The Federal Human Capital Survey is a tool that measures employees' perceptions of whether and to what extent conditions that characterize successful organizations are present in their agencies. The survey was administered for the first time in 2002 and sets a baseline for ongoing Human Capital assessment in the Federal Government. The survey asked for respondents' perceptions about personal work experience; recruitment, development, and retention; performance culture; leadership; learning (knowledge management); job satisfaction; and satisfaction with benefits.&lt;/p&gt;
description: Federal Human Capital Survey
description: collection_notes: The population of interest for the 2004 Federal Human Capital Survey was all employees from major Federal agencies represented on the President’s Management Council and 44 small/independent agencies that chose to participate in the survey. The sample was designed to ensure representative survey results would be reported by agency/subagency and supervisory status (i.e., non-supervisors, supervisors and managers, and executives) as well as for the overall Federal workforce.

Sample type. The sample was a probability sample; that is, each employee in the target population had a known, non-zero probability of selection. Probability sampling is a well-established survey technique and a prerequisite to generalizing from survey respondents to the survey population.

Sampling frame. The sampling frame was the lists of employees from all agencies participating in the survey. Employees were grouped into 786 sample subgroups corresponding to agency, subagency, and supervisory-status reporting requirements.

Sample size and selection. More than 276,000 employees were randomly selected from the frame. Selection probabilities varied across subgroups to ensure adequate representation of populations of interest. In some of the smaller subgroups, all employees were selected to provide broader coverage in critical areas.
DOI: 10.6077/n7kk-6j35
title: Euro-barometer 21: Political Cleavages in the European Community, April 1984

description: &lt;p&gt;This study explores public attitudes in the ten member nations of the European Economic Community. The monitoring of attitudes on European integration, life satisfaction, and social goals undertaken in previous Euro-Barometers was continued in this data collection. Respondents were asked questions regarding the European Community, specifically which nations they would prefer not be members of the Community. Respondents were also questioned concerning their consumer attitudes and buying habits, particularly concerning foreign products. German and British respondent attitudes toward present levels of government spending in a number of areas were also investigated. Additional questions, asked in Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands and Great Britain, measure respondent support for various political movements, such as ecology and anti-nuclear groups. (Source: downloaded from ICPSR 7/13/10)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Please Note&lt;/strong&gt;: This dataset is part of the historical CISER Data Archive Collection and is also available at ICPSR at &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08263.v1"&gt;https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08263.v1&lt;/a&gt;. We highly recommend using the ICPSR version as they may make this dataset available in multiple data formats in the future.&lt;/p&gt;
description: Eurobarometer
description: collection_notes: The fieldwork was carried out by a consortium of European organizations in all ten nations of the European community.
DOI: 10.6077/b3sr-m502
title: Augmented Individual Income Tax Model Exact Match File, 1972

description: &lt;p&gt;This data collection was developed for general use as part of CURRENT POPULATION SURVEY, 1973, AND SOCIAL SECURITY RECORDS: EXACT MATCH DATA (ICPSR 7616). This file merges information from two administrative sources: the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Social Security Administration (SSA). The starting point of the merged dataset was the IRS Tax Model File of Individual Income Tax Returns, a public-use IRS file designed to simulate the administrative and revenue impact of tax law changes. It contains over 100,000 federal income tax returns subsampled from the STATISTICS OF INCOME sample of the following 1972 tax forms: (1) 1040, Individual Income Tax Return (and its associated schedules), (2) 1040A, Individual Income Tax Return, Short Form, (3) 4625, Computation of Minimum Tax, (4) Maximum Tax on Earned Income, (5) Application for Automatic Extension of Time to File United States Individual Income Tax Return, (6) 4874, Credit for Wages Paid or Incurred in Work Incentive (WIN) Programs, and (7) 4875, Presidential Election Campaign Fund Statement. The nearly 170 items extracted from these tax forms include exemptions, earned and unearned income, income loss, foreign tax credit, medical and dental expenses over 3 percent of AGI, state and local income taxes, and capital gains and losses. To this individual income tax data, the Social Security Administration matched (using the unique identifier of Social Security number) selected demographic information (including such variables as the race, sex, and age of the primary taxpayer) from the SSA's longitudinal summary earnings files for income year 1972. The data are weighted. (Source: downloaded from ICPSR 7/13/10)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Please Note&lt;/strong&gt;: This dataset is part of the historical CISER Data Archive Collection and is also available at ICPSR at &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07667.v1"&gt;https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07667.v1&lt;/a&gt;. We highly recommend using the ICPSR version as they may make this dataset available in multiple data formats in the future.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.6077/ztpe-1f50
title: Estudio Actitudes, Valoraciones y Expectativas de los Adolescentes Colombianos, 1988
title: Investigation of the Attitudes, Values and Expectations of Adolescents in Colombia, 1988

description: &lt;p&gt;This study was a joint project of the Population Development Program at Cornell University and the Universidad Externado de Colombia (Bogota) as part of a series of joint projects in Peru, Colombia, and China by the Population Development Program at Cornell University. Funding was provided by the Rockerfeller Foundation. For purposes of sample selection as well as field work, the country was divided into the five geographical/cultural areas accepted by the national statistics institute (DANE). A total of 375 schools in 64 different locations throughout the country was thus included in the sample. The survey covers many socio-economic areas, including attitudes toward marriage, family life, and contraceptive use.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.6077/6s85-3y92
title: Attitudes in the American Workplace Poll, 2008

description: &lt;p&gt;This survey was conducted by Harris Interactive for the Marlin Company. Documentation is limited for this survey, however, reports on the findings are available. The Marlin Company’s 14 th Annual American Workplace Poll was conducted in May 2008 by Zogby International, which surveyed 755 US workers. Asked why they think companies go green, nearly onefourth (24.1%) said companies went green to save money; 22% said they did it to garner positive publicity and 14.1% said they did it to be politically correct. Only 17.4% cited social responsibility as the motivation, while 12.9% said that companies were going green as a way to counteract rising energy prices. Moreover, most workers said their employer lagged behind themselves in going green. When asked, “Who’s greener, you or your company?”, more than 60% (63.4%) of workers said that they were greener. And more than threefourths (77.7%) of US workers said it was important for them to have an employer that was going green in a significant way. Please see archive documentation for more information. Also note that there is a weighting variable included with the survey.&lt;/p&gt;
description: Attitudes in the American Workplace Poll
DOI: 10.6077/41rd-f182
title: Statistical Profiles of Public School Districts, 2004

description: &lt;p&gt;The data supports the report &quot;New York: The State of Learning. Volume 2: Statistical Profiles of Public School Districts. Topics include: Total expenditures/student; Combined wealth ratio; Racial/ethnic distribution of enrolment; free/reduced lunch; average class size; percent of school-aged residents with disabilities; and many more.&lt;/p&gt;
description: Statistical Profiles of Public School Districts
DOI: 10.6077/j5/kalqr8
title: Foreign Production, Supply, and Distribution of Agricultural Commodities, 1958-1987

description: &lt;p&gt;This database contains current and historical official USDA data on production, supply and distribution of agricultural commodities for the United States and key producing and consuming countries.&lt;/p&gt;
description: collection_notes: Commodities included: Grains (including rice); Oilseeds and Products; Cotton; Coffee; Tobacco (including cigarettes); Sugar; Dairy; Poultry; Livestock; Horticultural and Tropical Products.

DATES OF COVERAGE:
Grain - 1960/61-1988; Cigarettes - 1958-1987; Rice - 1961/62-1986/87; Dairy - 1987
DOI: 10.6077/j5/m322sy
title: United States Historical Climatology Network Daily Temperature, Precipitation, and Snow Data, 1871-1997

description: &lt;p&gt;Extending through 1994, this data base contains monthly total precipitation and temperature data from 1219 stations in the contiguous U.S. To be included in the Historical Climatology Network (HCN), a station had to be currently active (1994), have at least 80 years of monthly temperature and precipitation data, and have experienced few station changes. These data were derived from a variety of sources including the National Climatic Data Center archives, state climatologists, and published literature. The data base contains several hundred variables, including state number; station number; monthly temperatures (minimum, maximum, and mean); total monthly precipitation; and time of observation. This is probably the best monthly temperature and precipitation data set available for the contiguous U.S. because station moves, instrument changes, urbanization effects, and time-of-observation differences have been considered and, where necessary, the data have been corrected.&lt;/p&gt;
description: collection_notes: The selection of stations for inclusion in H92 was performed with the following data quality issues in mind.
 
1. The degree to which each station maintained a constant observation time for maximum and minimum temperatures, excursions from a station's predominant observing time of no more than four years being desired.
 
2. At least 95% of a station's pre-1951 data should be contained in NCDC digital daily archives.
 
3. A station's potential for heat island bias over time should be low.
 
4. Quality assessments based upon the decile ranking assigned by Karl et al. (1990) to the stations' monthly maximum/minimum temperature data for certain quality characteristics.
 
Since the release of H92, much more work has been conducted at NCDC involving compilation and digitizing of daily data. However, to enable the compilation of a database providing better spatial coverage of the contiguous United States, the four station selection criteria listed above were not strictly adhered to in the current version of the HCN/D presented here. While the stations selected in H92 were determined to be superior with regard to the above station selection criteria, the resulting network's spatial coverage of the United States was lacking in several regions. By including many more stations (mainly from the U.S. cooperative station network), and performing the needed QA checks, coverage has now been vastly improved. Figure 1 (in hard copy report) shows the distribution of the 1062 HCN/D stations. All of the contiguous 48 states are now represented by stations in the database, whereas H92 contained no stations for several states.
DOI: 10.6077/f801-hr21
title: Consolidated Federal Funds Report (CFFR), Fiscal Year 2000

description: &lt;p&gt;The Consolidated Federal Funds Report (CFFR) data, obtained from federal government agencies, cover federal expenditures or obligations for the following categories: direct payments for retirement and disability, other direct payments, grants, procurement contracts, salaries and wages, direct loans, guaranteed or insured loans, and insurance. Information available in the CFFR Data File (Part 1) includes FIPS geographic code, state abbreviated name, county name, place name, population, congressional district code, program identification code, object/assistance type code, agency code, and amount in whole dollars. For each unique FIPS code all programs are listed, and for each program all records with different object categories are listed. The CFFR Program Identification File (Part 2) contains program identification codes and their respective program titles. The CFFR Federal Agency File (Part 3) contains four-digit (FIPS-95) codes identifying specific agencies. (Source: downloaded from ICPSR 7/13/10)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Please Note&lt;/strong&gt;: This dataset is part of the historical CISER Data Archive Collection and is also available at ICPSR at &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03179.v1"&gt;https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03179.v1&lt;/a&gt;. We highly recommend using the ICPSR version as they may make this dataset available in multiple data formats in the future.&lt;/p&gt;
description: Consolidated Federal Funds Report (CFFR), Fiscal Year