cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr34699.v1
title: National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation (FHWAR), 2011
title: Version 1

description: The National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation (FHWAR) is a series conducted by the Census Bureau for the United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service. This collection contains information regarding fishing, hunting, and other wildlife-associated activities for 2011. The survey is conducted every 5 years and includes 3 waves. Wave 1 is household-based and consists of a screener with the possibility of detailed interviews asking about a person's hunting, fishing or wildlife-watching activities and the likelihood that they will hunt, fish or watch wildlife. Wave 2 and Wave 3 are person-based, detailed interviews in which respondents were selected for the sample based on data collected from the screener in the first wave. The Sportsperson and Wildlife-Watching surveys for wave 2 and 3 gathered specific information about respondents' recreational participation, including species hunted, fished, and watched; the state in which these activities occurred; number of trips taken; days of participation; and expenditures for food, lodging, transportation, and equipment. The questions asked throughout the 3 waves have been organized by topic into 3 datasets. The three datasets, (1) Screening, (2) Sportsperson (Fishing and Hunting), and (3) Wildlife Watching, may contain responses from people surveyed during multiple waves. Demographic variables include sex, age, race, marital status and parental relations, education level, household income, state of residence, and type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural).
description: The purpose of the FHWAR Survey is to gather information on the number of anglers, hunters, and wildlife-watchers in the United States as well as about the activities they participate in, how often they participate, and how much they spend on these activities.
description: The data contain a weight variable for each dataset that should be used when analyzing the data. Please refer to the "Original P.I. Documentation" section in ICPSR Codebook for information on weights.
description: Please refer to the "Original P.I. Documentation" section in the ICPSR Codebook for information on sampling.
description: Datasets: DS0: Study-Level Files DS1: Screening DS2: Sportsperson (Fishing and Hunting) DS3: Wildlife Watching
description: Persons 16 years and older residing in the United States. Smallest Geographic Unit: state
description: computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI); computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI)Additional information on the National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation (FHWAR) Series can be found at the United States Census Bureau Web site.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr34735.v1
title: National Crime Victimization Survey: Identity Theft Supplement, 2012
title: Version 1

description: The primary purpose of the Identity Theft Supplement is to obtain additional information about identity theft-related victimizations so that policymakers, academic researchers, practitioners at the Federal, state and local levels, and special interest groups who are concerned with identity theft can make informed decisions concerning policies and programs. Responses are linked to the NCVS survey instrument responses for a more complete understanding of the individual's circumstances.
description: The data contain weights for creating national estimates.
description: Response Rates: A final sample size of 69,814 out of the original NCVS-eligible respondents completed the ITS questionnaire, resulting in an ITS response rate of 91.9 percent. The combined overall NCVS-ITS unit response rate for NCVS households, NCVS persons, and ITS persons was 68.2 percent.
description: Each household member age 16 years or older was administered the 2012 ITS questionnaire.
description: Datasets: DS1: National Crime Victimization Survey: Identity Theft Supplement, 2012
description: NCVS household members ages 16 years or older. Smallest Geographic Unit: Region
description: computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI); computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6480139
title: Cheating interactions favor modularity in mutualistic networks

description: A fundamental fact about mutualisms is that these mutually beneficial interactions often harbor cheaters that benefit from the use of resources and services without providing any positive feedback to the other players. The role of cheaters on the evolutionary dynamics of mutualisms has long been recognized, yet their broader consequences to the community level, and beyond species they interact with, is still poorly understood. Because mutualisms form networks that often involve dozens to hundreds of species, indirect effects generated by cheaters may cascade through the whole community, reshaping trait evolution. Here, we study how harboring cheating interactions can influence coevolution in mutualistic networks. We combine a coevolutionary model, empirical data on animal-plant mutualistic networks, and numerical simulations and show that a higher frequency of cheating interactions in a network can lead to the formation of groups of species phenotypically similar to each other and distinct from other groups, generating higher trait disparity. The resulting clustered trait patterns, in turn, change the patterns of interaction in simulated networks, fostering the formation of modules of interacting species. Our results indicate that cheaters contribute to generate phenotypic clusters in mutualistic networks, counteracting selection for convergence imposed by mutualists, and favoring the emergence of modules of interacting species. Based on these results, we suggest that cheaters might be a fundamental element for our understanding of the evolution of mutualistic networks.
DOI: 10.34740/kaggle/dsv/3515555
title: WallStreetBets 2022
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr34772.v1
title: Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 1, 1989
title: Version 1

description: The Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 1, 1989, is the first wave in a ten-part longitudinal panel survey initiated by the Puget Sound Council of Governments (now known as the Puget Sound Regional Council) to assess the travel patterns of households in the Puget Sound region of Washington State. This collection contains the first set of panel data for 1,687 households in King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties. Due to various sources of attrition, approximately 20 percent of households needed to be replaced for each subsequent survey wave. The survey relied on the willingness of study area residents to (1) provide demographic information about the household, its members, and its vehicles, (2) document all travel for each household member, aged 15 years or older, for an assigned 2-day period, and (3) agree to participate in additional survey waves. After an initial telephone screening, survey participants received mailed travel diaries to aid in documenting travel information for the 2-day assessment period. Respondents were instructed to record their mode of transportation, trip purpose, number of vehicle passengers, departure and arrival times, ride fare, and parking costs. Demographic information for this study includes age, gender, education, employment status, and household income.
description: The panel was undertaken to serve three basic objectives: (1) to be a metropolitan "current population survey" to track changes in employment, work characteristics, household composition, and vehicle availability; (2) to monitor changes in travel behavior and responses to changes in the transportation environment; and (3) to examine changes in attitudes and values as they affect mode choice and travel behavior.
description: The data contain weight variables "HWGT" (Household weight) and "PWGT" (Person weight) that may be used in data analysis. For additional information on weights, please see the study documentation included with this release.
description: For information on sampling, please see "Sample Stratification" section of the Household Travel Panel documentation included with this release.
description: Datasets: DS1: Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 1, 1989
description: Households within the four county Seattle region (King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties). Smallest Geographic Unit: census tract
description: mail questionnaire; telephone interviewThis collection has not been processed by ICPSR. The deposited files are being released as they were received from the Principal Investigator.Users may notice that study documentation refers to the "Puget Sound Transportation Panel". ICPSR has retained the "Seattle Household Travel Survey" title that was provided by the data depositor. No additional information was provided regarding the title discrepancy.For additional information on all waves of the Seattle Household Travel Survey, please visit the Metropolitan Travel Survey Archive Web site and the Puget Sound Regional Council Web site.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr34772
title: Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 1, 1989
title: Archival Version

description: The Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 1, 1989, is the first wave in a ten-part longitudinal panel survey initiated by the Puget Sound Council of Governments (now known as the Puget Sound Regional Council) to assess the travel patterns of households in the Puget Sound region of Washington State. This collection contains the first set of panel data for 1,687 households in King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties. Due to various sources of attrition, approximately 20 percent of households needed to be replaced for each subsequent survey wave. The survey relied on the willingness of study area residents to (1) provide demographic information about the household, its members, and its vehicles, (2) document all travel for each household member, aged 15 years or older, for an assigned 2-day period, and (3) agree to participate in additional survey waves. After an initial telephone screening, survey participants received mailed travel diaries to aid in documenting travel information for the 2-day assessment period. Respondents were instructed to record their mode of transportation, trip purpose, number of vehicle passengers, departure and arrival times, ride fare, and parking costs. Demographic information for this study includes age, gender, education, employment status, and household income.
description: The panel was undertaken to serve three basic objectives: (1) to be a metropolitan "current population survey" to track changes in employment, work characteristics, household composition, and vehicle availability; (2) to monitor changes in travel behavior and responses to changes in the transportation environment; and (3) to examine changes in attitudes and values as they affect mode choice and travel behavior.
description: The data contain weight variables "HWGT" (Household weight) and "PWGT" (Person weight) that may be used in data analysis. For additional information on weights, please see the study documentation included with this release.
description: For information on sampling, please see "Sample Stratification" section of the Household Travel Panel documentation included with this release.
description: Datasets: DS1: Seattle Household Travel Survey Wave 1, 1989
description: Households within the four county Seattle region (King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties). Smallest Geographic Unit: census tract
description: mail questionnaire; telephone interviewThis collection has not been processed by ICPSR. The deposited files are being released as they were received from the Principal Investigator.Users may notice that study documentation refers to the "Puget Sound Transportation Panel". ICPSR has retained the "Seattle Household Travel Survey" title that was provided by the data depositor. No additional information was provided regarding the title discrepancy.For additional information on all waves of the Seattle Household Travel Survey, please visit the Metropolitan Travel Survey Archive Web site and the Puget Sound Regional Council Web site.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr34791.v1
title: San Diego Region Travel Behavior Survey (1995)
title: Version 1

description: The 1995 San Diego Travel Behavior Study was designed to examine the relationship between characteristics of households and travel behavior. This travel survey relied on the willingness of area residents to complete diary records of their daily travel. Recruitment of households was conducted through a "recruitment interview" in which respondents were informed of the survey, its purpose and the respondent's obligation to complete diaries. Data on households and household members were also collected during the recruitment interview, including whether the respondent was a homemaker, how often the respondent worked from home, and the number of vehicles in the household. Participating households were assigned a "travel day" during which household members were asked to record travel information in their diaries for a specified 24 hour period. Respondents were asked to document detailed information regarding their trips including number of trips and information about parking. Demographic variables include gender, age, race, whether the respondent held a valid driver's license, employment status, whether the respondent had a disability, occupation, and whether the respondent was a student.
description: The survey was designed to accomplish three objectives: to provide up-to-date travel information, to provide information about household and travel characteristics, and to provide a basis for future projections. For additional information regarding the purpose of this survey, please refer to the Original P.I. Documentation section of the ICPSR codebook.
description: In total, 2,375 households were recruited to participate in the study. Of these, 2,062 households completed travel diaries, and the information was retrieved from all household members older than age five. Of these, 2,049 were successfully geocoded to California state plane coordinates for home addresses. For additional information, please refer to the Original P.I. Documentation section of the ICPSR codebook.
description: Datasets: DS1: San Diego Region Travel Behavior Survey (1995)
description: Smallest Geographic Unit: Major Statistical Area
description: mail questionnaire; telephone interviewFor additional information, please refer to the Metropolitan Travel Survey Archive Web site.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr34791
title: San Diego Region Travel Behavior Survey (1995)
title: Archival Version

description: The 1995 San Diego Travel Behavior Study was designed to examine the relationship between characteristics of households and travel behavior. This travel survey relied on the willingness of area residents to complete diary records of their daily travel. Recruitment of households was conducted through a "recruitment interview" in which respondents were informed of the survey, its purpose and the respondent's obligation to complete diaries. Data on households and household members were also collected during the recruitment interview, including whether the respondent was a homemaker, how often the respondent worked from home, and the number of vehicles in the household. Participating households were assigned a "travel day" during which household members were asked to record travel information in their diaries for a specified 24 hour period. Respondents were asked to document detailed information regarding their trips including number of trips and information about parking. Demographic variables include gender, age, race, whether the respondent held a valid driver's license, employment status, whether the respondent had a disability, occupation, and whether the respondent was a student.
description: The survey was designed to accomplish three objectives: to provide up-to-date travel information, to provide information about household and travel characteristics, and to provide a basis for future projections. For additional information regarding the purpose of this survey, please refer to the Original P.I. Documentation section of the ICPSR codebook.
description: In total, 2,375 households were recruited to participate in the study. Of these, 2,062 households completed travel diaries, and the information was retrieved from all household members older than age five. Of these, 2,049 were successfully geocoded to California state plane coordinates for home addresses. For additional information, please refer to the Original P.I. Documentation section of the ICPSR codebook.
description: Datasets: DS1: San Diego Region Travel Behavior Survey (1995)
description: Smallest Geographic Unit: Major Statistical Area
description: mail questionnaire; telephone interviewFor additional information, please refer to the Metropolitan Travel Survey Archive Web site.
DOI: 10.34740/kaggle/dsv/3515621
title: Mahanagar Yatayat Dataset
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr34794.v1
title: U.S. National Security Commissions, 1981-2009
title: Version 1

description: This dataset presents information related to United States blue-ribbon commissions that examined national security issues between January 1981 and January 2009. The purpose of the dataset is to enable analysis of the influence of blue-ribbon commissions and of the conditions and characteristics that affect the influence of these commissions. Findings based on the dataset will be published in Jordan Tama, "Crises, Commissions, and Reform: The Impact of Blue-Ribbon Panels," Political Research Quarterly. Findings based on an earlier version of the dataset were published in Jordan Tama, Terrorism and National Security Reform: How Commissions Can Drive Change During Crises (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
description: Response Rates: 79 percent
description: Datasets: DS1: U.S. National Security Commissions, 1981-2009
description: Commissions.
description: The zipped package contains Microsoft Excel and Word files, which provide data, tables, and figures used in the publication.These data are part of ICPSR's Publication-Related Archive and are distributed exactly as they arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6480177
title: SynopSet: Multiscale Visual Abstraction Set for Explanatory Analysis of DNA-Nanotechnology Simulations

description: Dataset for the paper below: SynopSet: Multiscale Visual Abstraction Set for Explanatory Analysis of DNA Nanotechnology Simulations
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6480176
title: SynopSet: Multiscale Visual Abstraction Set for Explanatory Analysis of DNA-Nanotechnology Simulations

description: Dataset for the paper below: SynopSet: Multiscale Visual Abstraction Set for Explanatory Analysis of DNA Nanotechnology Simulations
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr34807.v1
title: Ithaka S+R, Jisc, RLUK UK Survey of Academics 2012
title: Version 1

description: The Ithaka S+R, Jisc, RLUK UK Survey of Academics 2012 examined the attitudes and behaviors of academics at higher education institutions across the United Kingdom. Respondents were asked about resource discovery and current awareness, library collections and content access, the print to electronic format transition, academic research methods and practices, undergraduate instruction, publishing and research dissemination, the role and value of the academic library, and the role of learned society. Demographic variables include age, gender, academic field, number of years of employment at the respondent's current college or university, and number of years working in the respondent's current field.
description: This study was intended to provide the education sector, including universities, learned societies, scholarly publishers, and academic libraries with timely findings and analysis to help them plan for the future.
description: Response Rates: The response rate for this survey was 7.9 percent
description: The population for this survey was academic staff at UK higher education institutions. To create the sample, investigators used a database of UK academics' contact information maintained by A-mail Academic, a UK-based marketing names list vendor. They inspected the A-mail Academic database and determined that it contained a large sub-set of UK higher education academic staff that seemed broadly representative of the overall national population. Within the total population of academics for whom A-mail could provide email contact information, the survey included all of those who were (1) academic staff, defined as those listed within the A-mail database with the rank of "Head of Department/Faculty," "Professor," "Lecturer," "Associate Professor," "Director," "Researcher," and "Reader"; and (2) the UK higher education (HE) sector, defined as the HE institutions funded by HEFCE, HEFCW, SFC, as well as Queen's University Belfast and University of Ulster in Northern Ireland. All individuals falling into the established population criteria at a 100 percent rate were sampled, for a sample size of 45,809.
description: Datasets: DS1: Ithaka S+R, Jisc, RLUK UK Survey of Academics 2012
description: Academic staff at UK higher education institutions. Smallest Geographic Unit: nation
description: web-based surveyFor additional information regarding the Ithaka S+R, Jisc, RLUK UK Survey of Academics 2012, please refer to the Ithaka S+R Web site.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr34807
title: Ithaka S+R, Jisc, RLUK UK Survey of Academics 2012
title: Archival Version

description: The Ithaka S+R, Jisc, RLUK UK Survey of Academics 2012 examined the attitudes and behaviors of academics at higher education institutions across the United Kingdom. Respondents were asked about resource discovery and current awareness, library collections and content access, the print to electronic format transition, academic research methods and practices, undergraduate instruction, publishing and research dissemination, the role and value of the academic library, and the role of learned society. Demographic variables include age, gender, academic field, number of years of employment at the respondent's current college or university, and number of years working in the respondent's current field.
description: This study was intended to provide the education sector, including universities, learned societies, scholarly publishers, and academic libraries with timely findings and analysis to help them plan for the future.
description: Response Rates: The response rate for this survey was 7.9 percent
description: The population for this survey was academic staff at UK higher education institutions. To create the sample, investigators used a database of UK academics' contact information maintained by A-mail Academic, a UK-based marketing names list vendor. They inspected the A-mail Academic database and determined that it contained a large sub-set of UK higher education academic staff that seemed broadly representative of the overall national population. Within the total population of academics for whom A-mail could provide email contact information, the survey included all of those who were (1) academic staff, defined as those listed within the A-mail database with the rank of "Head of Department/Faculty," "Professor," "Lecturer," "Associate Professor," "Director," "Researcher," and "Reader"; and (2) the UK higher education (HE) sector, defined as the HE institutions funded by HEFCE, HEFCW, SFC, as well as Queen's University Belfast and University of Ulster in Northern Ireland. All individuals falling into the established population criteria at a 100 percent rate were sampled, for a sample size of 45,809.
description: Datasets: DS1: Ithaka S+R, Jisc, RLUK UK Survey of Academics 2012
description: Academic staff at UK higher education institutions. Smallest Geographic Unit: nation
description: web-based surveyFor additional information regarding the Ithaka S+R, Jisc, RLUK UK Survey of Academics 2012, please refer to the Ithaka S+R Web site.