cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.48597/tkkt-kbwm
title: Measurement of PCB_138 at Aspvreten

description: Measurement of PCB_138 at Aspvreten
DOI: 10.48597/tp5m-s4ta
title: Measurement of Gamma_HCH at Aspvreten

description: Measurement of Gamma_HCH at Aspvreten
DOI: 10.48597/txpq-w8k7
title: Measurement of Dibenzo_ah_anthracene at Aspvreten

description: Measurement of Dibenzo_ah_anthracene at Aspvreten
DOI: 10.48597/u25b-p8aa
title: Measurement of Alpha_HCH at Pallas (Matorova)

description: Measurement of Alpha_HCH at Pallas (Matorova)
DOI: 10.48597/ucvx-t6ta
title: Measurement of BDE_209 at Pallas (Matorova)

description: Measurement of BDE_209 at Pallas (Matorova)
DOI: 10.48597/up36-h88f
title: Measurement of Benzo_b_fluoranthene at Aspvreten

description: Measurement of Benzo_b_fluoranthene at Aspvreten
DOI: 10.48597/uwkf-kvqz
title: Measurement of Benzo_a_pyrene at Pallas (Matorova)

description: Measurement of Benzo_a_pyrene at Pallas (Matorova)
DOI: 10.48597/v2n9-zy2x
title: Measurement of Beta_endosulfan at Pallas (Matorova)

description: Measurement of Beta_endosulfan at Pallas (Matorova)
DOI: 10.48597/v2vb-4sup
title: Measurement of Benz_a_anthracene at Pallas (Matorova)

description: Measurement of Benz_a_anthracene at Pallas (Matorova)
DOI: 10.48597/v7dz-5mgw
title: Measurement of HBCD at Råö

description: Measurement of HBCD at Råö
DOI: 10.48597/vbzn-vsyj
title: Measurement of Fluoranthene at Aspvreten

description: Measurement of Fluoranthene at Aspvreten
DOI: 10.48597/vqnx-sm3r
title: Measurement of PFOA at Råö

description: Measurement of PFOA at Råö
DOI: 10.48597/w6ps-zru3
title: Measurement of PFOS at Råö

description: Measurement of PFOS at Råö
DOI: 10.48597/wav2-2ksw
title: Measurement of PCB_101 at Råö

description: Measurement of PCB_101 at Råö
DOI: 10.48597/wp83-47cz
title: Measurement of BDE_100 at Råö

description: Measurement of BDE_100 at Råö
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.896736
title: NEEM Calcium and Sodium concentrations (10 year averages, 10-60ka BP
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.896739
title: NEEM high resolution calcium and sodium concentration (over warming events, 10-60ka)
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.896740
title: NGRIP high resolution calcium, sodium concentrations and layer thickness (over warming events, 10-60ka)
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.896742
title: NGRIP high resolution δ¹⁸O (over warming events, 10-60ka)
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.887684
title: Visual stratigraphy linescanner images from the Alpine ice core KCC (2013)
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.887691
title: XCT density from the Alpine ice core KCC (2013)
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.896737
title: NGRIP calcium, sodium, layer thickness and δ¹⁸O (10 year averages 10-60ka BP)
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.919313
title: Specific conductivity measured with the dielectric profiling (DEP) technique on the EGRIP ice core, 13.77-1383.84 m depth

description: Dielectric Profiling (DEP) of the East GReenland Ice core Project (EGRIP) core were recorded in the field during the 2017, 2018 and 2019 field seasons with the DEP device described by Wilhelms et al. (1998). The permittivity and conductivity of DEP data are calculated by their respective densities and conductivities (Wilhelms, 2005). The resolution of DEP data is 5 mm. The DEP was not processed at a consistent temperature due to the varying temperature in the field seasons. For more information on the calibration procedure see Mojtabavi et al, 2020.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.922047
title: Ice nucleating particle concentrations by droplet freezing assay measurements from the B17 ice core, Greenland, dating from 1370 to 1990

description: The data set reports on measurements of ice nucleating particles (INPs) from an ice core in Greenland (B17, 72.25, -37.25, 2820 m AMSL) that dates back to about 1370. INP measurements were performed using the FRIDGE INP counter as a droplet freezing assay for N = 135 meltwater samples from the core. From each sample 3 x 65 droplets of melt water (2.5 µL) were pipetted onto a sample substrate. The experimental nucleation temperature T was decreased at 1 °C/min until every droplet was frozen. The frozen fraction (FF) as a function of T is used to calculate the INP abundance per mL of melt water. A conversion factor is used to estimate atmospheric INP concentrations. The typical time coverage of a sampe is in the order of a couple of months. Samples were selected in regular time intervals of 10 years, plus a number of additional samples. This data supplement is related to a scientific publication (doi:10.5194/acp-2020-556).
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.922138
title: Permittivity measured with the dielectric profiling (DEP) technique on the EGRIP ice core, 13.77-1383.84 m depth

description: Dielectric Profiling (DEP) of the East GReenland Ice core Project (EGRIP) core were recorded in the field during the 2017, 2018 and 2019 field seasons with the DEP device described by Wilhelms et al. (1998). The permittivity and conductivity of DEP data are calculated by their respective densities and conductivities (Wilhelms, 2005). The resolution of DEP data is 5 mm. The DEP was not processed at a consistent temperature due to the varying temperature in the field seasons. For more information on the calibration procedure see Mojtabavi et al, 2020.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.922191
title: Specific conductivity measured with the dielectric profiling (DEP) technique on the NGRIP1 ice core (down to 1371.69 m depth)

description: Dielectric Profiling (DEP) of the North Greenland Ice Core Project (NGRIP1) core were recorded in the field during the 1996-1998 field seasons with the DEP device described by Wilhelms et al. (1998). The permittivity and conductivity of DEP data are calculated by their respective densities and conductivities (Wilhelms, 2005). The resolution of DEP data is 5 mm. The DEP was not processed at a consistent temperature due to the varying temperature in the field seasons. For more information on the calibration procedure see Mojtabavi et al, 2020.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.922192
title: Permittivity measured with the dielectric profiling (DEP) technique on the NGRIP1 ice core (down to 1371.69 m depth)

description: Dielectric Profiling (DEP) of the North Greenland Ice Core Project (NGRIP1) core were recorded in the field during the 1996-1998 field seasons with the DEP device described by Wilhelms et al. (1998). The permittivity and conductivity of DEP data are calculated by their respective densities and conductivities (Wilhelms, 2005). The resolution of DEP data is 5 mm. The DEP was not processed at a consistent temperature due to the varying temperature in the field seasons. For more information on the calibration procedure see Mojtabavi et al, 2020.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.922193
title: Specific conductivity measured with the dielectric profiling (DEP) technique on the NEEM ice core (down to 1493.295 m depth)

description: Dielectric Profiling (DEP) of the North Greenland Eemian (NEEM) core were recorded in the field during the 2008-2011 field seasons with the DEP device described by Wilhelms et al. (1998). The permittivity and conductivity of DEP data are calculated by their respective densities and conductivities (Wilhelms, 2005). The resolution of DEP data is 5 mm. The DEP was not processed at a consistent temperature due to the varying temperature in the field seasons. The upper 100 m is measured on NEEM–2008–S1 core, which was the NEEM pilot core. For more information on the calibration procedure see Mojtabavi et al, 2020.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.922195
title: Permittivity measured with the dielectric profiling (DEP) technique on the NEEM ice core (down to 1493.295 m depth)

description: Dielectric Profiling (DEP) of the North Greenland Eemian (NEEM) core were recorded in the field during the 2008-2011field seasons with the DEP device described by Wilhelms et al. (1998). The permittivity and conductivity of DEP data are calculated by their respective densities and conductivities (Wilhelms, 2005). The resolution of DEP data is 5 mm. The DEP was not processed at a consistent temperature due to the varying temperature in the field seasons. The upper 100 m is measured on NEEM–2008–S1 core, which was the NEEM pilot core. For more information on the calibration procedure see Mojtabavi et al, 2020.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.922285
title: Specific conductivity measured with the dielectric profiling (DEP) technique on the EGRIP ice core, 1383.84-2122.445 m depth

description: Dielectric Profiling (DEP) of the East GReenland Ice core Project (EGRIP) core were recorded in the field during the 2017, 2018 and 2019 field seasons with the DEP device described by Wilhelms et al. (1998). The permittivity and conductivity of DEP data are calculated by their respective densities and conductivities (Wilhelms, 2005). The resolution of DEP data is 5 mm depth intervals. The DEP was not processed at a consistent temperature due to the varying temperature in the field seasons. For more information on the calibration procedure see Mojtabavi et al, 2020.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.922299
title: Permittivity measured with the dielectric profiling (DEP) technique on the EGRIP ice core, 1383.84-2122.445 m depth

description: Dielectric Profiling (DEP) of the East GReenland Ice core Project (EGRIP) core were recorded in the field during the 2017, 2018 and 2019 field seasons with the DEP device described by Wilhelms et al. (1998). The permittivity and conductivity of DEP data are calculated by their respective densities and conductivities (Wilhelms, 2005). The resolution of DEP data is 5 mm depth intervals. The DEP was not processed at a consistent temperature due to the varying temperature in the field seasons. For more information on the calibration procedure see Mojtabavi et al, 2020.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.922303
title: Specific conductivity measured with the dielectric profiling (DEP) technique on the NEEM ice core (1493.30- 1757.310 m depth)

description: Dielectric Profiling (DEP) of the North Greenland Eemian (NEEM) core were recorded in the field during the 2008-2011field seasons with the DEP device described by Wilhelms et al. (1998). The permittivity and conductivity of DEP data are calculated by their respective densities and conductivities (Wilhelms, 2005). The resolution of DEP data is 5 mm depth intervals. The DEP was not processed at a consistent temperature due to the varying temperature in the field seasons. The upper 100 m is measured on NEEM–2008–S1 core, which was the NEEM pilot core. For more information on the calibration procedure see Mojtabavi et al, 2020.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.922305
title: Permittivity measured with the dielectric profiling (DEP) technique on the NEEM ice core (1493.30- 1757.310 m depth)

description: Dielectric Profiling (DEP) of the North Greenland Eemian (NEEM) core were recorded in the field during the 2008-2011field seasons with the DEP device described by Wilhelms et al. (1998). The permittivity and conductivity of DEP data are calculated by their respective densities and conductivities (Wilhelms, 2005). The resolution of DEP data is 5 mm depth intervals. The DEP was not processed at a consistent temperature due to the varying temperature in the field seasons. The upper 100 m is measured on NEEM–2008–S1 core, which was the NEEM pilot core. For more information on the calibration procedure see Mojtabavi et al, 2020.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.922306
title: Specific conductivity measured with the dielectric profiling (DEP) technique on the NGRIP2 ice core (down to 1298.525 m depth)

description: Dielectric Profiling (DEP) of the North Greenland Ice Core Project (NGRIP1) core were recorded in the field during the 1996-1998 field seasons with the DEP device described by Wilhelms et al. (1998). The permittivity and conductivity of DEP data are calculated by their respective densities and conductivities (Wilhelms, 2005). The resolution of DEP data is 5 mm depth intervals. The DEP was not processed at a consistent temperature due to the varying temperature in the field seasons. For more information on the calibration procedure see Mojtabavi et al, 2020.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.922308
title: Permittivity measured with the dielectric profiling (DEP) technique on the NGRIP2 ice core (down to 1298.525 m depth)

description: Dielectric Profiling (DEP) of the North Greenland Ice Core Project (NGRIP1) core were recorded in the field during the 1996-1998 field seasons with the DEP device described by Wilhelms et al. (1998). The permittivity and conductivity of DEP data are calculated by their respective densities and conductivities (Wilhelms, 2005). The resolution of DEP data is 5 mm depth intervals. The DEP was not processed at a consistent temperature due to the varying temperature in the field seasons. For more information on the calibration procedure see Mojtabavi et al, 2020.We used 3.15 (permittivity) for deeper than 100 m depth (based on the radar modelling results).
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.922348
title: Match points between the EGRIP core and the NGRIP1 core and corresponding GICC05 ages

description: A first chronology for the East GReenland Ice core Project (EGRIP) over the Holocene and last glacial termination has been derived by transferring the annual layer counted Greenland Ice Core Chronology 2005 (GICC05) from the NGRIP core to the EGRIP core using 381 matchpoints of mainly on volcanic events and common patterns (peaks and dips) recorded by electrical conductivity measurement (ECM) and dielectrical profiling (DEP) records.
description: All ages are given in whole years b2k (kyears before A.D. 2000) and are transfered to ka b2k.The match points are based on ECM and DEP data (patterns, peaks and dips).The GICC05 chronology extends to 60.2 ka b2k, and has been published in several stages. The relevant references here are:- Younger tha 8 ka: Vinther et al., Journ. Geophys. Res. 111, D13102, 2006.- Older than 8 ka: Rasmussen et al., Journ. Geophys. Res. 111, D06102, 2006. The value "MCE" is the Maximum Counting Error of the GICC05 time scale. See Rasmussen et al. (Journ. Geophys. Res. 111, D06102, 2006) for a full description. In a standard deviation context, the maximum counting error should be regarded as 2 sigma as discussed in Andersen et al., Quat. Sci. Rev. 25, p. 3246-3257, 2006. The counting error does not include uncertainty contributions from the time scale transfer. Most match points are accurate to 10 cm or better (i.e. a few years), but in some sections the synchronization is less robust. The time scale transfer involves interpolation over relatively long sections resulting in significant relative uncertainty. Synchronization carried out by S. Mojtabavi, G. Sinnl, M.S. Jensen and S.O. Rasmussen Inquiries regarding this data file: EGRIP dating consortium chairman Sune Olander Rasmussen, olander@nbi.ku.dk.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.922350
title: Match points between the EGRIP core and the NGRIP2 core and corresponding GICC05 ages

description: A first chronology for the East GReenland Ice core Project (EGRIP) over the Holocene and last glacial termination has been derived by transferring the annual layer counted Greenland Ice Core Chronology 2005 (GICC05) from the NGRIP core to the EGRIP core using 381 matchpoints of mainly on volcanic events and common patterns (peaks and dips) recorded by electrical conductivity measurement (ECM) and dielectrical profiling (DEP) records.
description: All ages are given in whole years b2k (kyears before A.D. 2000) and are transfered to ka b2k.The match points are based on ECM and DEP data (patterns, peaks and dips).The GICC05 chronology extends to 60.2 ka b2k, and has been published in several stages. The relevant reference here is Rasmussen et al., Journ. Geophys. Res. 111, D06102, 2006.The value "MCE" is the Maximum Counting Error of the GICC05 time scale. See Rasmussen et al. (Journ. Geophys. Res. 111, D06102, 2006) for a full description. In a standard deviation context, the maximum counting error should be regarded as 2 sigma as discussed in Andersen et al., Quat. Sci. Rev. 25, p. 3246-3257, 2006.The counting error does not include uncertainty contributions from the time scale transfer. Most match points are accurate to 10 cm or better (i.e. a few years), but in some sections the synchronization is less robust. The time scale transfer involves interpolation over relatively long sections resulting in significant relative uncertainty.Synchronization carried out by S. Mojtabavi, G. Sinnl, M.S. Jensen and S.O. RasmussenInquiries regarding this data file: EGRIP dating consortium chairman Sune Olander Rasmussen, olander@nbi.ku.dk.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.922393
title: Interpolated time scale for the ice with GICC05 ages for each bag depth (0.55 m segments) of the EGRIP core in the 13.7 - 1383.8 m depth interval

description: A first chronology for the East GReenland Ice core Project (EGRIP) over the Holocene and last glacial termination has been derived by transferring the annual layer counted Greenland Ice Core Chronology 2005 (GICC05) from the NGRIP core to the EGRIP core using 381 matchpoints of mainly on volcanic events and common patterns (peaks and dips) recorded by electrical conductivity measurement (ECM) and dielectrical profiling (DEP) records.
description: EGRIP bag depths have been transferred to NGRIP by linear interpolation between match points, and from these, GICC05 ages were obtained using the NGRIP (depth, age) relationship.All ages are given in whole years b2k (kyears before A.D. 2000) and are transfered to ka b2k.The match points are based on ECM and DEP data (patterns, peaks and dips).The NGRIP1 core reaches down to a depth of 1372 m. The NGRIP2 core (drilled 20 meters away from the NGRIP1 core) reaches from surface to bedrock, but high-resolution measurements apart from DEP have only been carried out downwards from 1346 m. In the 26 m overlap zone, the cores are offset by 0.43 m on average, probably due to uncertainties in the logging procedure (see Schøtt Hvidberg et al., Ann. Glac. 35, 2002). Thus, the same features appear at larger depths in the NGRIP1 than in the NGRIP2 core. Here, we derive the EGRIP time scale from the match points between EGRIP and NGRIP1 until 9813 a b2k and the match points between EGRIP and NGRIP2 below this.The GICC05 chronology extends to 60.2 ka b2k, and has been published in several stages. The relevant references here are:- Main Holocene part: Vinther et al., Journ. Geophys. Res. 111, D13102, 2006.- Late glacial / Early Holocene part: Rasmussen et al., Journ. Geophys. Res. 111, D06102, 2006.The value "MCE" is the Maximum Counting Error of the GICC05 time scale. See Rasmussen et al. (Journ. Geophys. Res. 111, D06102, 2006) for a full description. In a standard deviation context, the maximum counting error should be regarded as 2 sigma as discussed in Andersen et al., Quat. Sci. Rev. 25, p. 3246-3257, 2006.The counting error does not include uncertainty contributions from the time scale transfer. Most match points are accurate to 10 cm or better (i.e. a few years), but in some sections the synchronization is less robust. The time scale transfer involves interpolation over relatively long sections resulting in significant relative uncertainty.Synchronization carried out by S. Mojtabavi, G. Sinnl, M.S. Jensen and S.O. Rasmussen Inquiries regarding this data file: EGRIP dating consortium chairman Sune Olander Rasmussen, olander@nbi.ku.dk.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.927852
title: Topographic profiles across fault-related fold

description: The topographic profiles extend across a fault related fold in the hanging wall of the Danghe Nan Shan frontal thrust. The vertical distance between the fold hinge and the reference level represents the amount of uplift (shown in Figure 4 of Xu et al.).
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.933045
title: Microstructure maps with indicated micro-inclusions and grain boundaries (GB) of eleven samples (138-1340) m from the EastGRIP ice core

description: High-resolution microstructure maps were created from several hundred micro-photographs from eleven samples from the upper 1340 m of the East Greenland Ice Core Project ice core in North-East Greenland. Ice samples were drilled and processed between 2016 and 2019, microstructure mapping was performed between January 2020 and October 2020 at the Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research. The samples are between 1.0 and 14.1 ka yr old and cover the Holocene, Younger Dryas, and Bolling Allerod. Sample sizes are usually 10 x 10 mm; some samples are up to 90 mm long. The maps were used to locate solid micro-inclusions 500 micrometer below the sample surface and to analyse the grain boundary area and the amount of micro-inclusions located at grain boundaries. Tiff images include the mapped micro-inclusions and can be opened with ImageJ oder Fiji. The first three or four numbers indicate the samples bag, the number after the underscore implies the section of the respective bag. Yellow dots are located micro-inclusions, colored dots are located and measured (with Raman spectroscopy) micro-inclusions. Grain boundaries are saved as .svg files and can be used with the tiff images to measure the amount of inclusions at grain boundaries. Grain boundaries and inclusions were not totally counted/analysed for EGRIP2286_3 due to a too large amount of inclusions and thus unreliable data. The methods to derive the maps are described in detail in Kipfstuhl et al. (2006) and Eichler et al. (2017).
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.927851
title: Compilation of GPS data from NE Tibet

description: The GPS data compiled from Gan et al. (2007) and Wang & Shen (2020) illustrate the ongoing crustal shortening by thrust faulting along the active mountain ranges in northern Tibet (shown in Figure 4 of Xu et al.).
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.928416
title: Beryllium-10 exposure dating results for fluvial terraces, including input data for CRONUS-Earth 10Be – 26Al online calculator, link to xlsx file

description: The 10Be data set includes the geographic position and elevation of the analyzed samples and the detailed analytical results including the blank correction, the correction for geological inheritance, and the final 10Be concentrations (atoms/gram) used to calculate the 10Be exposure ages.
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.955821
title: Particulate dust concentrations and Coarse Particle Percentage from EPICA ice core EDML

description: We present a record of particulate dust concentration and size distribution in subannual resolution measured on the European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica (EPICA) Dronning Maud Land (EDML) ice core drilled in the Atlantic sector of the East Antarctic plateau. The record reaches from present day back to the penultimate glacial until 145,000 years B.P. with subannual resolution from 60,000 years B.P. to the present. Mean dust concentrations are a factor of 46 higher during the glacial (~850–4600 ng/mL) compared to the Holocene (~16–112 ng/mL) with slightly smaller dust particles during the glacial compared to the Holocene and with an absolute minimum in the dust size at 16,000 years B.P. The changes in dust concentration are mainly attributed to changes in source conditions in southern South America. An increase in the modal value of the dust size suggests that at 16,000 years B.P. a major change in atmospheric circulation apparently allowed more direct transport of dust particles to the EDML drill site. We find a clear in-phase relation of the seasonal variation in dust mass concentration and dust size during the glacial (r(conc,size) = 0.8) but no clear phase relationship during the Holocene (0
description: Particle number concentration N (in particles/ml), particle mass concentration M (in ng/ml) and coarse particle fraction CPP from the EPICA DML (EDML) ice core from 451 m to 1618 m depth in 1 cm resolution (corresponding to 6371 yr before present (BP, where present is defined as 1950) to 56508 yr BP on the AICC 2012 age scale). CPP is defined as the fraction of the volume concentration of particles larger than 2 micrometers divided by the volume concentration of all particles. Data have been calculated from raw data in mm resolution. Missing values are indicated by empty values. For details regarding the measurement method please consult Wegner et al. (2015).
DOI: 10.1594/pangaea.932686
title: Foraging traits of coral reef fishes obtained via stereo-video in Eilat, Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea