cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr36488
title: Federal Court Cases: Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 2014
title: Archival Version

description: In 2008, the Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AOUSC) began implementing the NewSTATS (New Streamline Timely Access to Statistics) Project with respect to bankruptcy data. The project's goals were to modernize the system for collecting, processing, analyzing, and reporting statistics of the federal court system. Based on the records for bankruptcy cases in NewSTATS, a data base for internal use in the Research Division of the Federal Judicial Center has been created. That data base is the Bankruptcy Petition NewSTATS Snapshots [BPNS] Data Base.
description: The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from 100 court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of a case: filing and termination. The termination data contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data contain only filing information. For the appellate and civil data, the unit of analysis is a single case. The unit of analysis for the criminal data is a single defendant.
description: Datasets: DS1: Federal Court Cases: Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 2014
description: All federal Bankruptcy Court cases in the United States in 2014.
description: record abstracts
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr36489
title: Federal Court Cases: Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 2015
title: Archival Version

description: In 2008, the Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AOUSC) began implementing the NewSTATS (New Streamline Timely Access to Statistics) Project with respect to bankruptcy data. The project's goals were to modernize the system for collecting, processing, analyzing, and reporting statistics of the federal court system. Based on the records for bankruptcy cases in NewSTATS, a data base for internal use in the Research Division of the Federal Judicial Center has been created. That data base is the Bankruptcy Petition NewSTATS Snapshots [BPNS] Data Base.
description: The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from 100 court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of a case: filing and termination. The termination data contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data contain only filing information. For the appellate and civil data, the unit of analysis is a single case. The unit of analysis for the criminal data is a single defendant.
description: Datasets: DS1: Federal Court Cases: Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 2015
description: All federal Bankruptcy Court cases in the United States in 2015.
description: record abstracts
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr36655
title: Federal Court Cases: Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, [United States], 2016
title: Archival Version

description: In 2008, the Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AOUSC) began implementing the NewSTATS (New Streamline Timely Access to Statistics) Project with respect to bankruptcy data. The project's goals were to modernize the system for collecting, processing, analyzing, and reporting statistics of the federal court system. Based on the records for bankruptcy cases in NewSTATS, a data base for internal use in the Research Division of the Federal Judicial Center has been created. That data base is the Bankruptcy Petition NewSTATS Snapshots [BPNS] Data Base.
description: The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from 100 court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of a case: filing and termination. The termination data contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data contain only filing information. For the appellate and civil data, the unit of analysis is a single case. The unit of analysis for the criminal data is a single defendant.
description: Datasets: DS1: Federal Court Cases: Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, [United States], 2016
description: All federal Bankruptcy Court cases in the United States in 2016.
description: record abstracts
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14837595
title: National Checklists: Mongolia Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13317551
title: National Checklists: Mongolia Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13316826
title: National Checklists: Serbia Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14837980
title: National Checklists: Serbia Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr06544
title: Long-Range Planning Survey of Federal Judges, 1992: [United States]
title: Archival Version

description: In October 1992, the Federal Judicial Center surveyed nearly all federal judges on a wide range of issues of concern to the federal courts. The survey was conducted for two purposes: to inform the deliberations of the Judicial Conference Committee on Long-Range Planning and to provide information for the Center's congressionally-mandated study of structural alternatives for the federal courts of appeals. Although the purposes were distinct, the areas of interest overlapped, resulting in a survey instrument that addressed many issues at differing levels of detail. The survey questions dealt with the nature and severity of problems in the federal courts, structure and relationships, jurisdiction size and resources, administration and governance, discovery, juries, criminal sanctions, deciding appeals in the current system, availability and compensation of counsel, and methods of civil dispute resolution.
description: ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Performed consistency checks.; Performed recodes and/or calculated derived variables.; Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes..
description: Datasets: 
 
 DS0: Study-Level Files 
 DS1: Data File 
 DS2: SAS Data Definition Statements
description: Frequencies are available in hardcopy form only upon request from ICPSR.
description: Federal judges in the United States.
description: A data collection instrument was mailed to anyone who was, as of October 1992, an active or senior circuit or district judge, a judge on the Court of International Trade or the Court of Federal Claims, a bankruptcy judge, or a full-time or part-time magistrate judge.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr36224
title: National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center's (NLECTC) Information and Geospatial Technology Center of Excellence (COE), 2014 - 2015
title: 2014 Geospatial Capabilities Survey
title: Archival Version
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr37495
title: Exposure to Violence, Trauma, and Juvenile Court Involvement: A Longitudinal Analysis of Mobile Youth and Poverty Study Data, Mobile, Alabama, 1998-2011
title: Archival Version

description: This project consists of secondary analysis material (syntax only, no data). The original study that the material pertains to is an examination of predominantly African American adolescents who live in extreme poverty. The study suggested that exposure to violence is positively related to involvement in the juvenile court system, and partially mediated by psychological factors, particularly hopelessness; thus, practitioners should take care to target more than just traumatic stress as a result of exposure to violence in African American impoverished youth.
description: The uncertainty associated with poverty creates existential challenges for day-to-day survival of children growing up poor. One area where this is particularly the case is exposure to violence and how it may portend future involvement in the juvenile court system. Additionally, exposure to violence is related to psychological and behavioral maladjustment. This study explored these factors as well as identifies approaches to intervention.
description: Datasets: DS1: Exposure to Violence, Trauma, and Juvenile Court Involvement: A Longitudinal Analysis of Mobile Youth and Poverty Study Data, Mobile, Alabama, 1998-2011
description: Adolescents living in extreme poverty in the Mobile, Alabama, Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA).
description: This project involved the secondary analysis of existing Mobile Youth and Poverty Study data that is archived at the University of Alabama and the product of the project is limited to information concerning analysis of the data; therefore, based on an agreement with OJJDP and the primary investigators, no data are included.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr37495.v1
title: Exposure to Violence, Trauma, and Juvenile Court Involvement: A Longitudinal Analysis of Mobile Youth and Poverty Study Data, Mobile, Alabama, 1998-2011
title: Version 1

description: This project consists of secondary analysis material (syntax only, no data). The original study that the material pertains to is an examination of predominantly African American adolescents who live in extreme poverty. The study suggested that exposure to violence is positively related to involvement in the juvenile court system, and partially mediated by psychological factors, particularly hopelessness; thus, practitioners should take care to target more than just traumatic stress as a result of exposure to violence in African American impoverished youth.
description: The uncertainty associated with poverty creates existential challenges for day-to-day survival of children growing up poor. One area where this is particularly the case is exposure to violence and how it may portend future involvement in the juvenile court system. Additionally, exposure to violence is related to psychological and behavioral maladjustment. This study explored these factors as well as identifies approaches to intervention.
description: Datasets: DS1: Exposure to Violence, Trauma, and Juvenile Court Involvement: A Longitudinal Analysis of Mobile Youth and Poverty Study Data, Mobile, Alabama, 1998-2011
description: Adolescents living in extreme poverty in the Mobile, Alabama, Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA).
description: This project involved the secondary analysis of existing Mobile Youth and Poverty Study data that is archived at the University of Alabama and the product of the project is limited to information concerning analysis of the data; therefore, based on an agreement with OJJDP and the primary investigators, no data are included.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr08076
title: Governmental Responses to Crime in the United States, 1948-1978
title: Archival Version

description: The Governmental Responses to Crime Project was initiated in October 1978 as a result of the rising crime rate in urban areas of the United States and the wide variety of programs seeking to contain it. The project investigated the way in which urban governments, citizens, newspapers and state governments responded to the growth and increasing complexity of crime during the period from 1948 to 1978. Pertinent variables in this data collection include the number of police officers in cities and police expenditures, changes in laws as crime changes, populations, employment rates, family incomes, percent of non-white population, media tracking of crime, city land area, kinds of crimes, crime rates, actual numbers of offenses, penalties given out for crimes committed (time in jail or prison and fines), focus on crimes within certain geographical areas (from within cities or outside the United States), editorial page content, level of prominence of newspaper articles on individual crimes, and the number of editorials relating to specific crimes.
description: United States cities with both extreme high and low values for several factors relevant to the response to crime, as well as "average" values for same.
description: Datasets: DS0: Study-Level Files DS1: Baseline DS2: Ten City DS3: City Ordinances DS4: State Ordinances DS5: Media Attentiveness in Minneapolis DS6: Media Attentiveness in Indianapolis DS7: Media Attentiveness in Philadelphia DS8: Media Attentiveness in Boston DS9: Media Attentiveness in Oakland DS10: Media Attentiveness in San Jose DS11: Media Attentiveness in Atlanta DS12: Media Attentiveness in Phoenix DS13: Media Attentiveness in Houston
description: All cities in the United States with a population over 50,000 in 1950, 1960, 1970 and 1975.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13316577
title: National Checklists: India Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13316578
title: National Checklists 2019: India Species List

description: Lists of taxa for each country and a few other administrative zones harvested from effechecka using simplified versions of geonames polygons. See https://github.com/diatomsRcool/checklists for details.
A list of species from India collected using effechecka and geonames polygons
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14837438
title: National Checklists: India Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr09094
title: Prosecution of Felony Arrests, 1986: Indianapolis, Los Angeles, New Orleans, Portland, St. Louis, and Washington, DC
title: Archival Version

description: This data collection represents the sixth in a series of statistical reports sponsored by the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The purpose of the series is to provide statistical information on how prosecutors and the courts dispose of criminal cases involving adults arrested for felony crimes. With this purpose in mind, information was collected on items such as an individual's arrest date, sentencing date, court charge, and case disposition.
description: Datasets: DS0: Study-Level Files DS1: Indianapolis DS2: Los Angeles DS3: New Orleans DS4: Portland DS5: St. Louis DS6: Washington, DC
description: All felony arrests disposed in 1986 in Indianapolis, Los Angeles, New Orleans, Portland, St. Louis, and Washington, DC.
description: This study was conducted by Abt Associates.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr08717
title: Prosecution of Felony Arrests, 1982: Portland, Oregon and Washington, D.C.
title: Archival Version

description: This study provides statistical information on how prosecutors and the courts disposed of criminal cases involving adults arrested for felony crimes in two individual urban jurisdictions, Portland, Oregon and Washington, D.C. Cases in the data files were initiated or filed in 1982. Both the Washington, D.C. file and the Portland file contain information on all felony arrests (which include arrests declined as well as those filed), cases filed, and cases indicted. Sentencing information is provided in the Portland file but is not available for Washington D.C.
description: Datasets: DS0: Study-Level Files DS1: Washington, D.C. DS2: Portland
description: All information stored on a jurisdiction's PROMIS system for felony cases initiated in 1982, cases initiated in 1981, and cases initiated in the two or more years after 1982.
description: For reasons of confidentiality, the police department identification number, the individual's true name, and the circuit attorney's manual case file number have been blanked. This is part of a larger three-part study.
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr08705
title: Prosecution of Felony Arrests, 1982: St. Louis
title: Archival Version

description: This data collection provides statistical information on how prosecutors and the courts disposed of criminal cases involving adults arrested for felony crimes in an individual urban jurisdiction, St. Louis. The cases in the data file represent cases initiated in 1982, defined as screened, or filed in 1982. The collection includes disposition data on felonies for which an initial court charge was filed (cases filed) and for those felony arrests that were ultimately indicted or bound over to the felony court for disposition (cases indicted). It does not include information on all felony arrests declined for prosecution. It is, with a few exceptions, extracted from the defendant, case, charge and sentence records.
description: Datasets: DS1: Prosecution of Felony Arrests, 1982: St. Louis
description: All information stored on a jurisdiction's PROMIS system for felony cases initiated in 1982, cases initiated in 1981, and for two or more years after 1982.
description: For reasons of confidentiality, the police department identification number (PDID), the individual's true name (NAME), and the circuit attorney's manual case file number (CASEJACK) have been blanked. This is part of a larger three-part study.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13317989
title: National Checklists: Anguilla Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14836398
title: National Checklists: Anguilla Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.3886/icpsr08669
title: National Crime Surveys: Redesign Data: Peoria Record Check Study
title: Archival Version

description: The purpose of this study was to measure criminal activity in the United States based on survey reports of crime victims. In the study two different questionnaire forms were used in order to assess which provided better responses. One form was very lengthy and asked detailed questions about each household, person, and incident. The second form was much shorter and asked very generalized questions. The data collection was an attempt to find alternative methods of sampling, interviewing, designing questionnaires, managing data, and reporting results. Detailed information is provided on household characteristics and other characteristics of the respondents, as well as on crime incidents, including burglary, vandalism, assault, and rape.
description: Combination of sample from police record system and random digit dialed sample.
description: Datasets: DS0: Study-Level Files DS1: Record Check 1, Person-level Data DS2: Record Check 1, Incident-level Data DS3: Record Check 2, Screener Data DS4: Record Check 2, Incident Level Data DS5: National Sample, Current Data DS6: National Sample, Experimental Data
description: All persons in the United States twelve years of age and older.
description: For reasons of confidentiality the ICPSR has masked several variables.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13317628
title: National Checklists: Poland Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14837921
title: National Checklists: Poland Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13317727
title: National Checklists: Tanzania Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13317728
title: National Checklists 2019: Tanzania Species List

description: Lists of taxa for each country and a few other administrative zones harvested from effechecka using simplified versions of geonames polygons. See https://github.com/diatomsRcool/checklists for details.
A list of species from Tanzania collected using effechecka and geonames polygons
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14838147
title: National Checklists: Tanzania Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13317634
title: National Checklists: Qatar Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13317635
title: National Checklists 2019: Qatar Species List

description: Lists of taxa for each country and a few other administrative zones harvested from effechecka using simplified versions of geonames polygons. See https://github.com/diatomsRcool/checklists for details.
A list of species from Qatar collected using effechecka and geonames polygons
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14837970
title: National Checklists: Qatar Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13316700
title: National Checklists: Madagascar Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14837584
title: National Checklists: Madagascar Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13316449
title: National Checklists: Brazil Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14836576
title: National Checklists: Brazil Species List

description: Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk