cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.11587/lwdad0
title: COVID-19 Distance Learning Tyrol (SUF edition)
title: COVID-19 Distance Learning Tirol

description: Full edition for scientific use. New distance learning methods were quickly implemented in Tyrol, Austria, in March 2020 as a response to the Corona pandemic. The study „COVID-19 Distance Learning Tyrol“ surveyed 2314 Tyrolean teachers with an online questionnaire (field time 24th of April to 8th of May 2020). The topics were digital learning before and distance learning during the crisis as well as chances, fears and expectations for an optimized school life after the crisis.
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cgo8lw/jyebwf
title: Luglio_1914_Pagina_166.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1914/07/28
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cea2oy/hnrs1q
title: Settembre_1888_Pagina_034.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1888/09/09
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cmir61/9zkhs8
title: Settembre_1897_Pagina_016.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1897/09/04
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/zbysir/hk4u4s
title: Ottobre_1900_Pagina_067.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1900/10/17
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/zvkzj5/jbevw2
title: Luglio_1918_Pagina_151.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1918/07/26
DOI: 10.11587/vrql3b
title: Learning conditions during COVID-19 school context (SUF edition)
title: Lernen unter COVID-19-Bedingungen Schulkontext

description: Full edition for scientific use. The study "Learning conditions during COVID-19 school context" of the University of Vienna consists of two phases: Phase I, conducted between April and June 2020, and phase II, conducted between November 2020 and May 2021. Phase I contains three measurement points with pupils. In phase II, the first measurement point addressed pupils, the second measurement point addressed pupils, teachers, parents, and school principals. In total, 50190 pupils, 1348 parents, 1022 teachers, and 169 school principals participated in the study. All datasets are cross-sectional in nature. The first phase of the project focused on the role of basic psychological needs and self-regulated learning for positive affect and intrinsic motivation during the pandemic. The second phase expanded its scope including resilience factors (self-efficacy, personality traits, support) as well as perceived overload in target group's functioning in times of COVID-19. The nature of the variables in all datasets is numerical.
description: Date of Collection Measurement point 1: Start: 2020-04-02 ; End: 2020-04-24<br>
Date of Collection Measurement point 2: Start: 2020-04-27 ; End: 2020-05-15<br>
Date of Collection Measurement point 3: Start: 2020-06-08 ; End: 2020-06-29<br>
Date of Collection Measurement point 4: Start: 2020-11-22 ; End: 2020-12-06<br>
Date of Collection Measurement point 5: Start: 2021-04-06 ; End: 2021-05-25<br>
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cgo8lw/2g3ylx
title: Luglio_1914_Pagina_167.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1914/07/28
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/i5awbn/x91fl6
title: Luglio_1920_Pagina_140.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1920/07/24
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/pddrps/nnbrn9
title: Febbraio_1937_Pagina_203.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1937/02/21
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cea2oy/swspxd
title: Settembre_1888_Pagina_035.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1888/09/09
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cmir61/dgk3xc
title: Settembre_1897_Pagina_017.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1897/09/05
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/zvkzj5/r8sora
title: Luglio_1918_Pagina_152.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1918/07/26
DOI: 10.11587/xiu3tx
title: Learning conditions during COVID-19 Students (SUF edition)

description: Full edition for scientific use. This dataset consists of five separate datafiles representing three measurement points and two types of methods (cross-sectional and longitudinal) for the project "Lernen unter COVID-19-Bedingungen Studierende" [Learning conditions during COVID-19 Students] of the University of Vienna. Measurement point 1 (cross-sectional and longitudinal) contains 6074 data records of students in Austria attending higher education and was surveyed in March/April 2020. Measurement point 2 (cross-sectional) contains 3732 data records of the same target group and Measurement point 2 (longitudinal) contains 1819 data records, both were surveyed in April/May 2020. Measurement point 3 (cross-sectional) contains 661 data records and Measurement point 3 (longitudinal) contains 1386 data records, both were surveyed in June 2020. The dataset contains sociodemographic variables as well as items that can be used to operationalize positive emotion, intrinsic learning motivation, competence, autonomy, social relatedness, engagement, perseverance, gender role self-concept, procrastination and self-regulated learning (SRL) in terms of goal setting and planning, time management and metacognition. Furthermore, the dataset contains information on changes in these variables over time, variables measuring the degree to which students are informed on COVID-19 measures as well as items that explore perception of measures implemented to contain the spread of corona virus.
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/i5awbn/mxqyke
title: Luglio_1920_Pagina_141.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1920/07/24
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/zbysir/pxsgki
title: Ottobre_1900_Pagina_068.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1900/10/17
DOI: 10.11587/g3c2cs
title: COVID-19 Prevalence November 2020 (SUF edition)
title: COVID-19 Prävalenz November 2020

description: Full edition for scientific use. The main purpose of the study was to identify the number of people actually infected with coronavirus in Austria, as well as the number of people who have formed antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and thus have been infected and further to report how people are feeling during this crisis. A representative random sample of 7823 people was drawn based on the population register of Austria (people living in Austria, exluding those currently in hospital and those aged younger than 16 years). The estimated percentage of SARS-CoV-2 infected persons in the Austrian resident population aged 16 and older was 3.1% on average in mid-November [95% confidence interval: 2.6-3.5%]. From the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic until mid/end of October 2020, 4.7% of Austrian residents (people aged 16 and over living in private households) had formed antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and thus have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 [95% confidence interval: 3.8-5.6%].
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cea2oy/lwlst7
title: Settembre_1888_Pagina_036.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1888/09/09
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cgo8lw/p8jkkh
title: Luglio_1914_Pagina_168.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1914/07/28
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/pddrps/bzvpqn
title: Febbraio_1937_Pagina_204.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1937/02/21
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cmir61/ghxtby
title: Settembre_1897_Pagina_018.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1897/09/05
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/zvkzj5/eycptr
title: Luglio_1918_Pagina_153.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1918/07/26
DOI: 10.11587/pzhm0a
title: Learning in a State of Emergency (SUF edition)
title: Lernen im Ausnahmezustand - Risiken und Chancen (SUF edition)

description: Full edition for scientific use. The data was collected between April 2020 and June 2020 as part of the study "Learning in a State of Emergency" funded by the WWTF. During this time, pupils (aged between 6 and 20 years) and their parents at eleven Viennese schools were asked three times about their experiences with distance learning. During this time three online surveys were sent out - one focusing on distance learning during the first lockdown in April; one focusing on the time when schools were partly re-opened in June; and one before summer holiday, balancing the experiences of the semester. The data from the six surveys (three for pupils; three for parents) were linked using a key, generated by the respondents themselves. The data set includes responses from pupils and parents from a total of 617 families, of which children and/or parents participated in at least one of the surveys. In 361 cases only responses from the pupils are available, in 142 cases only responses from the parents. This means that answers from pupils and their parents from at least one of the three survey waves are available from 142 families.
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cea2oy/y6l17g
title: Settembre_1888_Pagina_037.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1888/09/10
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cgo8lw/uqqoaz
title: Luglio_1914_Pagina_169.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1914/07/29
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/zbysir/kv2jrl
title: Ottobre_1900_Pagina_069.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1900/10/18
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cmir61/nw1mze
title: Settembre_1897_Pagina_019.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1897/09/05
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/i5awbn/oqgxwu
title: Luglio_1920_Pagina_142.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1920/07/24
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/pddrps/7qeap5
title: Febbraio_1937_Pagina_205.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1937/02/21
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cea2oy/yiypce
title: Settembre_1888_Pagina_038.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1888/09/10
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/zbysir/jfjpmw
title: Ottobre_1900_Pagina_070.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1900/10/18
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/zvkzj5/w8ozi2
title: Luglio_1918_Pagina_154.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1918/07/26
DOI: 10.17632/kdhkrc4h5c
title: Presence Factors Scale (PFS): An Assessment Method for Presence in Virtual Reality (VR) Immersive Environments

description: The Presence Factor Scale (PFS) is a low-cost, highly applicable method for evaluating the sense of presence that an immersive Virtual Environment experience can provide. The process eliminates the need for expensive, complex user evaluations while also providing valuable guidelines for designing new VR experiences. The PFS was developed from an extensive systematic literature review that identified 23 factors affecting presence. These factors were organized into three primary categories: Engagement, Interactive Fidelity, and Sensorial Fidelity. For each factor, a score is assigned on a 1-7 scale, and the final average score indicates the overall sense of presence provided by the VE, with 7 indicating the highest presence. The PFS validation followed the recommendations of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (AERA; APA; NCME, 2014), providing evidence based on test content, response process, internal structure, and relations to other variables. The method also demonstrated high reliability, with a test-retest correlation coefficient of 0.89. The attached file contains the complete instrument with all categories, factors, levels, and corresponding scores.
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cgo8lw/gnumrp
title: Luglio_1914_Pagina_170.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1914/07/29
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/i5awbn/kqabbz
title: Luglio_1920_Pagina_143.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1920/07/24
DOI: 10.17632/kdhkrc4h5c.1
title: Presence Factors Scale (PFS): An Assessment Method for Presence in Virtual Reality (VR) Immersive Environments

description: The Presence Factor Scale (PFS) is a low-cost, highly applicable method for evaluating the sense of presence that an immersive Virtual Environment experience can provide. The process eliminates the need for expensive, complex user evaluations while also providing valuable guidelines for designing new VR experiences. The PFS was developed from an extensive systematic literature review that identified 23 factors affecting presence. These factors were organized into three primary categories: Engagement, Interactive Fidelity, and Sensorial Fidelity. For each factor, a score is assigned on a 1-7 scale, and the final average score indicates the overall sense of presence provided by the VE, with 7 indicating the highest presence. The PFS validation followed the recommendations of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (AERA; APA; NCME, 2014), providing evidence based on test content, response process, internal structure, and relations to other variables. The method also demonstrated high reliability, with a test-retest correlation coefficient of 0.89. The attached file contains the complete instrument with all categories, factors, levels, and corresponding scores.
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cmir61/7s99tj
title: Settembre_1897_Pagina_020.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1897/09/05
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/pddrps/zsjppt
title: Febbraio_1937_Pagina_206.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1937/02/21
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/zvkzj5/y3qqjy
title: Luglio_1918_Pagina_155.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1918/07/26
DOI: 10.11587/f7cd4d
title: COVID-19 Social Indicator Survey (SUF edition)

description: Full edition for scientific use. The Center for Social & Health Innovation (CSHI) has conducted an online two-wave panel survey to investigate potential social consequences of the COVID-19 epidemic. In the first wave, 1024 Austrian individuals were surveyed. The second wave was conducted in June 2020. The study contains indicators on people’s information habits, their attitudes toward COVID-19 policies, their knowledge, and the fears related to the crisis. 
About the data. The data collection was implemented by Dynata, a private market research company. We used predefined quotes based on Statistics Austria population data. The composition of the sample largely represents the population structure of Austria. Even though the composition is similar to the Austrian population, this is not a random sample, thus we cannot make precise predictions about population distributions. The survey was conducted between April 1 and April 7, 2020. 
Response rate. The survey received 1800 klicks and 1725 individuals started the survey. Of those 1725 individuals, 33 individuals did not agree to participate after reading the informed consent, 555 were screened out due to full quotas, and 113 individuals did not complete the survey for other reasons. A total of 1024 individuals completed the survey.
Wave 2. The second wave was collected between June 2 and June 10. Invitations were sent out to wave 1 participants only. The second wave received 769 clicks and 632 completed the survey. Of those, 320 were female, 312 were male. 105 had compulsory school degrees only, 305 went to vocational school, 115 had high school degrees, and 104 a college degree. Mean age was 49.30 (SD = 17.53).
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cgo8lw/ytz5cj
title: Luglio_1914_Pagina_171.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1914/07/29
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/zbysir/squh3j
title: Ottobre_1900_Pagina_071.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1900/10/18
DOI: 10.11587/ovhktr
title: Polarization in public opinion: Combining social surveys and big data analyses of Twitter (SUF Edition)
title: Polarisierung in der öffentlichen Meinung (SUF Edition)

description: Full edition for scientific use. Our research aims to measure polarization in public opinion, combining two state-of-the-art approaches in measuring opinion - survey
research and big data analytics of social media. We focus on the topic of polarization of opinions on COVID-19 and climate change and identify if and how polarization - a shift towards more extreme positions - occurs within both sources, if and how opinions and respondents differ between sources, and whether the opinions in the two sources are aligned.
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cea2oy/t4ba4f
title: Settembre_1888_Pagina_039.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1888/09/10
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cmir61/xszgft
title: Settembre_1897_Pagina_021.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1897/09/06
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/i5awbn/etndnd
title: Luglio_1920_Pagina_144.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1920/07/24
DOI: 10.11587/6yqasy
title: Values in Crisis Austria – Wave 1 and Wave 2 combined (SUF edition)
title: Werte in der Krise Österreich - Welle 1 und Welle 2 kombiniert

description: Full edition for scientific use. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to various Online-Panel studies to study the social effects of the crisis. The Values in Crisis study stands out in three central aspects. First, it offers a differentiated perspective to study how basic values of Austrian citizens change during times of crises. Second, the VIC study is a global survey project (see https://doi.org/10.11587/LIHK1L) which enables to compare the effects of the pandemic in Austria with other countries in Europe and beyond. Third, the study represents a comparative longitudinal study, measuring the effects of the pandemic in three survey waves called “inmidst the crisis”, “end at sight” and “overcoming the pandemic”. This new dataset “Values in Crisis Austria – Wave 1 and Wave 2 combined” represents the Austrian data of the first wave (May 2020) and second wave (March/April 2021) combined. It is possible to analyse the data of the two waves separately or to conduct longitudinal analysis (based on n = 1222 respondents taking part in both surveys).The study investigates basic values (measured with classical value concepts such as the Inglehart Index and the short Portraits Values Questionnaire by Shalom Schwartz) as well as the exposure to the crisis, attitudes towards politics and perceptions on public health and social and economic consequences of the pandemic. Besides the international master-questionnaire we included in the second wave of the survey various Austrian specific questions about attitudes towards public restrictions, towards social distancing or Austrian views of a post-corona society.
description: Date of Collection Wave 1: Start: 2020-05-14 ; End: 2020-05-24<br>
Date of Collection Wave 2: Start: 2021-03-25 ; End: 2021-04-12
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/pddrps/symcfl
title: Febbraio_1937_Pagina_207.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1937/02/21
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/zbysir/0erdo7
title: Ottobre_1900_Pagina_072.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1900/10/18
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/zvkzj5/buhxxa
title: Luglio_1918_Pagina_156.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1918/07/26
DOI: 10.17632/245fvn76fy
title: Big Reforms, Big Returns? Evidence from Structural Reform Shocks

description: Replication files for the paper "Big Reforms, Big Returns? Evidence from Structural Reform Shocks"
DOI: 10.11587/d9ayz7
title: AKCOVID Panel Survey (SUF edition)
title: AKCOVID-Studie

description: Full edition for scientific use. Original survey data has been collected in June 2020 (N=2000 persons aged 20-64) and January 2021 (N=1417 longitudinal design) with the aim to study the implications of the pandemic on the labour market, the livelihood of families, family relations, working conditions, mental well-being, and the perception of the contagion risk at the work place in different sections of the workforce. Surveys carried out by IFES.
DOI: 10.11587/koxgpc
title: ICKE - International Corona Daycare Center Survey (SUF edition)
title: ICKE - Internationale Corona Kita Erhebung

description: Full edition for scientific use. The SARS-CoV2 pandemic affected kindergarten and crèche system thus also the families of kindergarten and crèche children for over a year. The ICKE project (International Corona Daycare Survey) is an international cooperation project between the Clinic for Paediatrics with a focus on Pneumology, Immunology and Intensive Care Medicine Berlin and the International Centre for Professionalisation of Elementary Education (PEP) of the University of Graz with locations in Graz and Berlin. In this study, the prevalence and impact of Covid 19 infections in daycare centers, nurseries, and kindergartens in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland in the second wave (August 2020 to January 2021) were investigated within the framework of two quantitative online surveys addressed to families (N=16756) and daycare center managers or directors (N=3619) of kindergartens or nurseries. The interviews took place from the end of January to March 2021.
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cgo8lw/qlu8oo
title: Luglio_1914_Pagina_172.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1914/07/29
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cmir61/2r8sav
title: Settembre_1897_Pagina_022.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1897/09/06
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/i5awbn/ckserw
title: Luglio_1920_Pagina_145.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1920/07/25
DOI: 10.17632/245fvn76fy.1
title: Big Reforms, Big Returns? Evidence from Structural Reform Shocks

description: Replication files for the paper "Big Reforms, Big Returns? Evidence from Structural Reform Shocks"
DOI: 10.11587/cqeejr
title: The use of self-administered Corona tests in schools (SUF edition)
title: Corona-Selbsttest an Schulen

description: Full edition for scientific use. The survey aimed at collecting representative data of Austrian schools. A stratified sampling approach was used. Parents were asked to state their personal attitudes towards the self-administred coronavirus testing scheme used in Austrian schools, as well as describe the use of the testing scheme by their children.
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cea2oy/mnttdd
title: Settembre_1888_Pagina_040.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1888/09/10
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/zbysir/aewwmz
title: Ottobre_1900_Pagina_073.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1900/10/19
DOI: 10.11587/vb8cmb
title: IHS COVID-19 Survey 2021 (SUF edition)
title: IHS COVID-19 Umfrage 2021

description: Full edition for scientific use. The IHS COVID-19 Survey 2021 is an Austrian opinion survey which measures attitudes, behavior and work-related changes in the Austrian society during the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey also consists of general ESS items and ESS socio-demographic variables, thus it is possible to compare these data to pre-pandemic ESS data.
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/i5awbn/oexhqs
title: Luglio_1920_Pagina_146.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1920/07/25
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/pddrps/ktn6xz
title: Febbraio_1937_Pagina_208.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1937/02/21
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/zvkzj5/sgbfat
title: Luglio_1918_Pagina_157.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1918/07/27
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cea2oy/ohgflr
title: Settembre_1888_Pagina_041.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1888/09/11
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cgo8lw/dnw0cl
title: Luglio_1914_Pagina_173.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1914/07/29
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cmir61/idii4m
title: Settembre_1897_Pagina_023.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1897/09/06
DOI: 10.11587/lgpp3g
title: COVID-19 and education: What can be done to ensure that the health and educational crises do not turn into social selectivity in the classroom? (SUF edition)
title: COVID-19 und Bildung: Was tun, damit aus der Gesundheits- keine Bildungskrise wird?

description: Full edition for scientific use. In an Austria-wide online survey, the teaching and learning situation during the Corona-related school closures was surveyed from the perspective of teachers: What learning content, tasks, communication channels are used? How do teachers assess the learning situation and the learning success of their students? To what extent do they succeed in reaching students, where do they see the greatest challenges, and how are they personally doing? Against the background of social selectivity, a focus was placed on the situation of disadvantaged students and differences within classes. The survey was conducted using an online questionnaire at two survey dates when schools were closed due to the pandemic in 2020: first wave in May 2020 with a qualified response of 4019, second wave in late November/early December 2020 with a qualified response of 3708.
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/pddrps/cyjcmj
title: Febbraio_1937_Pagina_209.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1937/02/21
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/zbysir/h9evlq
title: Ottobre_1900_Pagina_074.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1900/10/19
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/zvkzj5/uvqqgi
title: Luglio_1918_Pagina_158.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1918/07/27
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cea2oy/xlpmhn
title: Settembre_1888_Pagina_042.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1888/09/11
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/cgo8lw/6jvii1
title: Luglio_1914_Pagina_174.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1914/07/29
DOI: 10.13130/rd_unimi/i5awbn/06ayua
title: Luglio_1920_Pagina_147.jpg

description: Bulletin of 1920/07/25