cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550200
title: Appendix B. Survival and recruitment for T &gt; 2.

description: Survival and recruitment for T &gt; 2.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550200.v1
title: Appendix B. Survival and recruitment for T &gt; 2.

description: Survival and recruitment for T &gt; 2.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550197
title: Appendix C. Details of the simulation study of the Jolly-Seber extension to our spatially explicit capture–recapture model.

description: Details of the simulation study of the Jolly-Seber extension to our spatially explicit capture–recapture model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550197.v1
title: Appendix C. Details of the simulation study of the Jolly-Seber extension to our spatially explicit capture–recapture model.

description: Details of the simulation study of the Jolly-Seber extension to our spatially explicit capture–recapture model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550194
title: Supplement 1. The R code with embedded WinBUGS specification to run the simulation study and a separate WinBUGS file with specification for the spatially explicit open population model used in the Pampas cat study.

description: File List RCODE.txt<br> WINBUGS.txt Description "RCODE.txt" : This file contains the R code with the WinBUGS specification to run the simulation study with <i>T</i> = 3 for the spatially explicit open population model. N, φ, σ, M, and other parameters can be adjusted to simulate various size data sets. In the specification, we create some data such as “grid”, a J × 2 matrix of the (x,y) locations of the traps and we estimate other parameters such as the SX and SY, the estimated (x,y) locations of the activity centers. This code calls WinBUGS from within R using the R2WinBUGS package. "WINBUGS.txt" : WinBugs specification for the spatially explicit open population model used in the Pampas cat study. There are only <i>T</i> = 2 time periods in this specification. Here, “trapmat” is a J × 2 matrix of the (x,y) locations of the traps and SX and SY are the estimated (x,y) locations of the activity centers. “year” is an indicator variable that tells if a trap <i>j</i> was operational during year <i>t</i> of the survey.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550191
title: Appendix A. Multisite CMR recruitment model with a nonobservable state: matrix description.

description: Multisite CMR recruitment model with a nonobservable state: matrix description.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550191.v1
title: Appendix A. Multisite CMR recruitment model with a nonobservable state: matrix description.

description: Multisite CMR recruitment model with a nonobservable state: matrix description.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550188
title: Appendix B. Leslie Matrix.

description: Leslie Matrix.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550188.v1
title: Appendix B. Leslie Matrix.

description: Leslie Matrix.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550185
title: Appendix C. Sensitivity of the results of the integrated model to changes in the prior distribution of the survey error parameter.

description: Sensitivity of the results of the integrated model to changes in the prior distribution of the survey error parameter.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550185.v1
title: Appendix C. Sensitivity of the results of the integrated model to changes in the prior distribution of the survey error parameter.

description: Sensitivity of the results of the integrated model to changes in the prior distribution of the survey error parameter.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550182
title: Appendix A. The competing models and model selection results.

description: The competing models and model selection results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550182.v1
title: Appendix A. The competing models and model selection results.

description: The competing models and model selection results.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550179
title: Appendix B. Approaches for constraining multistate capture–recapture models to estimate habitat and landscape transition probabilities.

description: Approaches for constraining multistate capture–recapture models to estimate habitat and landscape transition probabilities.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550179.v1
title: Appendix B. Approaches for constraining multistate capture–recapture models to estimate habitat and landscape transition probabilities.

description: Approaches for constraining multistate capture–recapture models to estimate habitat and landscape transition probabilities.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550176
title: Appendix C. Transition matrices used to project effects of alternative management scenarios for four habitat states: short, optimal, tall mix, and tall in two scrub ecosystem habitat types.

description: Transition matrices used to project effects of alternative management scenarios for four habitat states: short, optimal, tall mix, and tall in two scrub ecosystem habitat types.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550176.v1
title: Appendix C. Transition matrices used to project effects of alternative management scenarios for four habitat states: short, optimal, tall mix, and tall in two scrub ecosystem habitat types.

description: Transition matrices used to project effects of alternative management scenarios for four habitat states: short, optimal, tall mix, and tall in two scrub ecosystem habitat types.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550173
title: Appendix A. Latin names of the 163 spider (Aranae) species, 139 bee (Apidae) species, and 63 bird (Aves) species including their relative dominance and steadiness per city.

description: Latin names of the 163 spider (Aranae) species, 139 bee (Apidae) species, and 63 bird (Aves) species including their relative dominance and steadiness per city.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550173.v1
title: Appendix A. Latin names of the 163 spider (Aranae) species, 139 bee (Apidae) species, and 63 bird (Aves) species including their relative dominance and steadiness per city.

description: Latin names of the 163 spider (Aranae) species, 139 bee (Apidae) species, and 63 bird (Aves) species including their relative dominance and steadiness per city.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550170
title: Appendix B. Biplot of species community analysis of spiders (Araneae) for the three study cities.

description: Biplot of species community analysis of spiders (Araneae) for the three study cities.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550167
title: Appendix C. Biplot of species community analysis of birds (Aves) for the three study cities.

description: Biplot of species community analysis of birds (Aves) for the three study cities.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550167.v1
title: Appendix C. Biplot of species community analysis of birds (Aves) for the three study cities.

description: Biplot of species community analysis of birds (Aves) for the three study cities.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550164
title: Appendix A. Generalized Linear Mixed Models used to explain the probability of crossing an imposed sand gap in Detour and Patch configurations in relation to environmental and social habitat predictors.

description: Generalized Linear Mixed Models used to explain the probability of crossing an imposed sand gap in Detour and Patch configurations in relation to environmental and social habitat predictors.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550164.v1
title: Appendix A. Generalized Linear Mixed Models used to explain the probability of crossing an imposed sand gap in Detour and Patch configurations in relation to environmental and social habitat predictors.

description: Generalized Linear Mixed Models used to explain the probability of crossing an imposed sand gap in Detour and Patch configurations in relation to environmental and social habitat predictors.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550161
title: Appendix B. Generalized Linear Mixed Models used to explain the number of agonistic interactions experienced during homing in relation to the deviation of the homing path and to the density of damselfish along the homing path.

description: Generalized Linear Mixed Models used to explain the number of agonistic interactions experienced during homing in relation to the deviation of the homing path and to the density of damselfish along the homing path.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550161.v1
title: Appendix B. Generalized Linear Mixed Models used to explain the number of agonistic interactions experienced during homing in relation to the deviation of the homing path and to the density of damselfish along the homing path.

description: Generalized Linear Mixed Models used to explain the number of agonistic interactions experienced during homing in relation to the deviation of the homing path and to the density of damselfish along the homing path.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550158
title: Appendix C. Summary table of the size and steepness of a barrier to movement for 11 species distributed among six studies in relation to species mass and territory diameter.

description: Summary table of the size and steepness of a barrier to movement for 11 species distributed among six studies in relation to species mass and territory diameter.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550158.v1
title: Appendix C. Summary table of the size and steepness of a barrier to movement for 11 species distributed among six studies in relation to species mass and territory diameter.

description: Summary table of the size and steepness of a barrier to movement for 11 species distributed among six studies in relation to species mass and territory diameter.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550155
title: Appendix A. Additional details regarding sampling methods.

description: Additional details regarding sampling methods.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550155.v1
title: Appendix A. Additional details regarding sampling methods.

description: Additional details regarding sampling methods.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550152
title: Appendix B. Computing total variance in generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) ANOVAs.

description: Computing total variance in generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) ANOVAs.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550152.v1
title: Appendix B. Computing total variance in generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) ANOVAs.

description: Computing total variance in generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) ANOVAs.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550149
title: Appendix C. Comparison between GLMM and “standard” methods.

description: Comparison between GLMM and “standard” methods.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550149.v1
title: Appendix C. Comparison between GLMM and “standard” methods.

description: Comparison between GLMM and “standard” methods.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550146
title: Appendix D. Infection prevalences for individual host–parasite species pairings.

description: Infection prevalences for individual host–parasite species pairings.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550143
title: Appendix E. Annotated R code and output for analyses presented in the article .

description: Annotated R code and output for analyses presented in the article .
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550146.v1
title: Appendix D. Infection prevalences for individual host–parasite species pairings.

description: Infection prevalences for individual host–parasite species pairings.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550140
title: Supplement 1. Data files to be used with annotated R code presented in Appendix E.

description: File List DentInfections.txt – data on infections in <i>Daphnia dentifera</i> DentPulInfections.txt – data on infections in both <i>Daphnia pulicaria</i> and <i>Daphnia dentifera</i> Description Appendix E presents R code for analyzing infection prevalence in <i>Daphnia pulicaria </i>and <i>Daphnia dentifera</i>, using data contained in DentInfections.txt and DentPulInfections.txt. In DentInfections.txt: (1) Lake = Lake name (2) Year (3) ParaSp = Parasite species (4) HostSp = Host species (5) Percent = Maximum percent infection (6) Trans = Arcsin square root transformation of maximum proportion infected (7) ParNum = Parasite species, unique number assigned to each species from column 3 (8) HostNum = Host species, 1 = dentifera (9) LakeNum = Lake, unique number assigned to each lake in column 1 (10) N = Number of individuals in sample on date of maximum infection prevalence (11) Ninf = Number of infected individuals in sample on date of maximum infection prevalence <br> In DentPulInfections.txt: (1) Lake = Lake name (2) Year (3) ParaSp = Parasite species (4) HostSp = Host species (5) Percent = Maximum percent infection (6) Trans = Arcsin square root transformation of maximum proportion infected (7) ParNum = Parasite species, unique number assigned to each species from column 3 (8) HostNum = Host species, 1 = dentifera, 2 = pulicaria (9) LakeNum = Lake, unique number assigned to each lake in column 1 (10) N = Number of individuals in sample on date of maximum infection prevalence (11) Ninf = Number of infected individuals in sample on date of maximum infection prevalence
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550140.v1
title: Supplement 1. Data files to be used with annotated R code presented in Appendix E.

description: File List DentInfections.txt – data on infections in <i>Daphnia dentifera</i> DentPulInfections.txt – data on infections in both <i>Daphnia pulicaria</i> and <i>Daphnia dentifera</i> Description Appendix E presents R code for analyzing infection prevalence in <i>Daphnia pulicaria </i>and <i>Daphnia dentifera</i>, using data contained in DentInfections.txt and DentPulInfections.txt. In DentInfections.txt: (1) Lake = Lake name (2) Year (3) ParaSp = Parasite species (4) HostSp = Host species (5) Percent = Maximum percent infection (6) Trans = Arcsin square root transformation of maximum proportion infected (7) ParNum = Parasite species, unique number assigned to each species from column 3 (8) HostNum = Host species, 1 = dentifera (9) LakeNum = Lake, unique number assigned to each lake in column 1 (10) N = Number of individuals in sample on date of maximum infection prevalence (11) Ninf = Number of infected individuals in sample on date of maximum infection prevalence <br> In DentPulInfections.txt: (1) Lake = Lake name (2) Year (3) ParaSp = Parasite species (4) HostSp = Host species (5) Percent = Maximum percent infection (6) Trans = Arcsin square root transformation of maximum proportion infected (7) ParNum = Parasite species, unique number assigned to each species from column 3 (8) HostNum = Host species, 1 = dentifera, 2 = pulicaria (9) LakeNum = Lake, unique number assigned to each lake in column 1 (10) N = Number of individuals in sample on date of maximum infection prevalence (11) Ninf = Number of infected individuals in sample on date of maximum infection prevalence
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550137
title: Appendix A. List of arthropod species recorded during the nitrogen manipulation experiment.

description: List of arthropod species recorded during the nitrogen manipulation experiment.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550137.v1
title: Appendix A. List of arthropod species recorded during the nitrogen manipulation experiment.

description: List of arthropod species recorded during the nitrogen manipulation experiment.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550134
title: Appendix B. Effects of nitrogen addition on plant parameters.

description: Effects of nitrogen addition on plant parameters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550131
title: Appendix C. Effects of Spartina alterniflora biomass on trophic group richness.

description: Effects of Spartina alterniflora biomass on trophic group richness.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550131.v1
title: Appendix C. Effects of Spartina alterniflora biomass on trophic group richness.

description: Effects of Spartina alterniflora biomass on trophic group richness.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550128
title: Appendix D. Sample-based rarefaction curves estimating species richness according to the number of individuals found within a plot.

description: Sample-based rarefaction curves estimating species richness according to the number of individuals found within a plot.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550125
title: Appendix E. Percentage contribution of different arthropod species to compositional dissimilarities among nitrogen treatments.

description: Percentage contribution of different arthropod species to compositional dissimilarities among nitrogen treatments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550122
title: Appendix F. Abundance of species that made the greatest contribution to dissimilarity among nitrogen treatments.

description: Abundance of species that made the greatest contribution to dissimilarity among nitrogen treatments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550119
title: Appendix G. Effects of fertilization on rare species.

description: Effects of fertilization on rare species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550119.v1
title: Appendix G. Effects of fertilization on rare species.

description: Effects of fertilization on rare species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550116
title: Appendix A. Range map of Quercus garryana and map of study sites on Vancouver Island, British Columbia.

description: Range map of Quercus garryana and map of study sites on Vancouver Island, British Columbia.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550113
title: Appendix B. Phenology of Neuroterus saltatorius and Erynnis propertius on Vancouver Island, British Columbia.

description: Phenology of Neuroterus saltatorius and Erynnis propertius on Vancouver Island, British Columbia.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550113.v1
title: Appendix B. Phenology of Neuroterus saltatorius and Erynnis propertius on Vancouver Island, British Columbia.

description: Phenology of Neuroterus saltatorius and Erynnis propertius on Vancouver Island, British Columbia.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550110
title: Appendix C. Using Neuroterus saltatorius foliar damage as a surrogate for density, and assignment of damage categories for butterfly (Erynnis propertius) performance experiment.

description: Using Neuroterus saltatorius foliar damage as a surrogate for density, and assignment of damage categories for butterfly (Erynnis propertius) performance experiment.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550110.v1
title: Appendix C. Using Neuroterus saltatorius foliar damage as a surrogate for density, and assignment of damage categories for butterfly (Erynnis propertius) performance experiment.

description: Using Neuroterus saltatorius foliar damage as a surrogate for density, and assignment of damage categories for butterfly (Erynnis propertius) performance experiment.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550107
title: Appendix D. Measuring the performance of Erynnis propertius: size, survivorship, and butterfly production.

description: Measuring the performance of Erynnis propertius: size, survivorship, and butterfly production.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550107.v1
title: Appendix D. Measuring the performance of Erynnis propertius: size, survivorship, and butterfly production.

description: Measuring the performance of Erynnis propertius: size, survivorship, and butterfly production.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550104
title: Appendix A. Temperature and light cycle settings used in growth chambers for caterpillar rearing.

description: Temperature and light cycle settings used in growth chambers for caterpillar rearing.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550104.v1
title: Appendix A. Temperature and light cycle settings used in growth chambers for caterpillar rearing.

description: Temperature and light cycle settings used in growth chambers for caterpillar rearing.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550101
title: Full Archive

description: Full Archive
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550101.v1
title: Full Archive

description: Full Archive
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550098
title: Appendix A. Cumulative soil microbial 15N uptake rate of three nitrogen forms in plots with alpine plants grown alone and in competition.

description: Cumulative soil microbial 15N uptake rate of three nitrogen forms in plots with alpine plants grown alone and in competition.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550098.v1
title: Appendix A. Cumulative soil microbial 15N uptake rate of three nitrogen forms in plots with alpine plants grown alone and in competition.

description: Cumulative soil microbial 15N uptake rate of three nitrogen forms in plots with alpine plants grown alone and in competition.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550092
title: Appendix A. A list of papers from which data were extracted for this metadata analysis.

description: A list of papers from which data were extracted for this metadata analysis.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550089
title: Appendix B. Effects of continuous factors on CH4 flux in control and nitrogen-amended plots.

description: Effects of continuous factors on CH4 flux in control and nitrogen-amended plots.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550086
title: Appendix A. Site information and climatic data.

description: Site information and climatic data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550083
title: Appendix B. Summary of all mixed models tested for the data set "all species" and "sunlit species".

description: Summary of all mixed models tested for the data set "all species" and "sunlit species".
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550083.v1
title: Appendix B. Summary of all mixed models tested for the data set "all species" and "sunlit species".

description: Summary of all mixed models tested for the data set "all species" and "sunlit species".
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550080
title: Appendix C. PCA ordination of plant traits.

description: PCA ordination of plant traits.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550077
title: Appendix A. Components and parameter values of the integral projection models for 11 Phyteuma spicatumpopulations in 2006–2007 and 2007–2008.

description: Components and parameter values of the integral projection models for 11 Phyteuma spicatumpopulations in 2006–2007 and 2007–2008.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550080.v1
title: Appendix C. PCA ordination of plant traits.

description: PCA ordination of plant traits.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550077.v1
title: Appendix A. Components and parameter values of the integral projection models for 11 Phyteuma spicatumpopulations in 2006–2007 and 2007–2008.

description: Components and parameter values of the integral projection models for 11 Phyteuma spicatumpopulations in 2006–2007 and 2007–2008.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550074
title: Appendix B. Effects of population on growth of seedlings, juveniles, and adults in 2006–2007 and 2007–2008.

description: Effects of population on growth of seedlings, juveniles, and adults in 2006–2007 and 2007–2008.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550071
title: Appendix C. Effects of population on survival of seedlings, juveniles, and adults in 2006–2007 and 2007–2008.

description: Effects of population on survival of seedlings, juveniles, and adults in 2006–2007 and 2007–2008.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550074.v1
title: Appendix B. Effects of population on growth of seedlings, juveniles, and adults in 2006–2007 and 2007–2008.

description: Effects of population on growth of seedlings, juveniles, and adults in 2006–2007 and 2007–2008.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550071.v1
title: Appendix C. Effects of population on survival of seedlings, juveniles, and adults in 2006–2007 and 2007–2008.

description: Effects of population on survival of seedlings, juveniles, and adults in 2006–2007 and 2007–2008.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550068
title: Appendix D. Effects of population on the probability of flowering of adults in 2006, 2007, and 2008.

description: Effects of population on the probability of flowering of adults in 2006, 2007, and 2008.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550068.v1
title: Appendix D. Effects of population on the probability of flowering of adults in 2006, 2007, and 2008.

description: Effects of population on the probability of flowering of adults in 2006, 2007, and 2008.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550065
title: Appendix E. Elasticity of population growth rate to changes in survival, growth, and reproduction in 2006–2007 and 2007–2008.

description: Elasticity of population growth rate to changes in survival, growth, and reproduction in 2006–2007 and 2007–2008.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3550065.v1
title: Appendix E. Elasticity of population growth rate to changes in survival, growth, and reproduction in 2006–2007 and 2007–2008.

description: Elasticity of population growth rate to changes in survival, growth, and reproduction in 2006–2007 and 2007–2008.