cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1323638
title: Romanian Results From The Monitoring Of Pesticide Residues In Food

description: This dataset contains the analytical results of pesticide residues measured in the food products analysed by the national competent authorities. Pesticide residues resulting from the use of plant protection products on crops that are used for food or feed production may pose a risk factor for public health. For this reason, a comprehensive legislative framework has been established in the European Union (EU), which defines rules for the approval of active substances used in plant protection products, the use of plant protection products and for pesticide residues in food. In order to ensure a high level of consumer protection, legal limits, so called “maximum residue levels” or briefly “MRLs”, are established in Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. EU-harmonised MRLs are set for all pesticides covering all types of food products. A default MRL of 0.01 mg/kg is applicable for pesticides not explicitly mentioned in the MRL legislation. Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 imposes on Member States the obligation to carry out controls to ensure that food placed on the market is compliant with the legal limits.

A sample is considered <strong>free of quantifiable residues</strong> if the analytes were not present in concentrations at or above the limit of quantification (LOQ). The LOQ is the smallest concentration of an analyte that can be quantified with the analytical method used to analyse the sample. It is commonly defined as the minimum concentration of the analyte in the test sample that can be determined with acceptable precision and accuracy.

If a sample is <strong>contains quantifiable residues</strong> but within the legally permitted limit (maximum residue level, MRL), it is described as a sample  with quantified residue levels within the legal limits (below or at the MRL)

A sample is considered <strong>non-compliant</strong> with the legal limit (MRL), if the measured residue concentrations clearly exceed the legal limits, taking into account the measurement uncertainty. It is current practice that the uncertainty of the analytical measurement is taken into account before legal or administrative sanctions are imposed on food business operators for infringement of the MRL legislation.
description: data.collection@efsa.europa.eu
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2587889
title: Romanian results from the monitoring of pesticide residues in food

description: This dataset contains the analytical results of pesticide residues measured in the food products analysed by the national competent authorities. Pesticide residues resulting from the use of plant protection products on crops that are used for food or feed production may pose a risk factor for public health. For this reason, a comprehensive legislative framework has been established in the European Union (EU), which defines rules for the approval of active substances used in plant protection products, the use of plant protection products and for pesticide residues in food. In order to ensure a high level of consumer protection, legal limits, so called “maximum residue levels” or briefly “MRLs”, are established in Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. EU-harmonised MRLs are set for all pesticides covering all types of food products. A default MRL of 0.01 mg/kg is applicable for pesticides not explicitly mentioned in the MRL legislation. Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 imposes on Member States the obligation to carry out controls to ensure that food placed on the market is compliant with the legal limits. A sample is considered <strong>free of quantifiable residues</strong> if the analytes were not present in concentrations at or above the limit of quantification (LOQ). The LOQ is the smallest concentration of an analyte that can be quantified with the analytical method used to analyse the sample. It is commonly defined as the minimum concentration of the analyte in the test sample that can be determined with acceptable precision and accuracy. If a sample is <strong>contains quantifiable residues</strong> but within the legally permitted limit (maximum residue level, MRL), it is described as a sample with quantified residue levels within the legal limits (below or at the MRL) A sample is considered <strong>non-compliant</strong> with the legal limit (MRL), if the measured residue concentrations clearly exceed the legal limits, taking into account the measurement uncertainty. It is current practice that the uncertainty of the analytical measurement is taken into account before legal or administrative sanctions are imposed on food business operators for infringement of the MRL legislation.
description: data.collection@efsa.europa.eu We are seeking feedback on our open data please complete the survey at the link below https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/9344dfa0-f384-cb72-65f6-6c187a6d0f14
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3260918
title: Romanian results from the monitoring of pesticide residues in food

description: This dataset contains the analytical results of pesticide residues measured in the food products analysed by the national competent authorities. Pesticide residues resulting from the use of plant protection products on crops that are used for food or feed production may pose a risk factor for public health. For this reason, a comprehensive legislative framework has been established in the European Union (EU), which defines rules for the approval of active substances used in plant protection products, the use of plant protection products and for pesticide residues in food. In order to ensure a high level of consumer protection, legal limits, so called “maximum residue levels” or briefly “MRLs”, are established in Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. EU-harmonised MRLs are set for all pesticides covering all types of food products. A default MRL of 0.01 mg/kg is applicable for pesticides not explicitly mentioned in the MRL legislation. Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 imposes on Member States the obligation to carry out controls to ensure that food placed on the market is compliant with the legal limits. A sample is considered <strong>free of quantifiable residues</strong> if the analytes were not present in concentrations at or above the limit of quantification (LOQ). The LOQ is the smallest concentration of an analyte that can be quantified with the analytical method used to analyse the sample. It is commonly defined as the minimum concentration of the analyte in the test sample that can be determined with acceptable precision and accuracy. If a sample is <strong>contains quantifiable residues</strong> but within the legally permitted limit (maximum residue level, MRL), it is described as a sample with quantified residue levels within the legal limits (below or at the MRL) A sample is considered <strong>non-compliant</strong> with the legal limit (MRL), if the measured residue concentrations clearly exceed the legal limits, taking into account the measurement uncertainty. It is current practice that the uncertainty of the analytical measurement is taken into account before legal or administrative sanctions are imposed on food business operators for infringement of the MRL legislation. <strong>REPORTING AUTHORITIES CONTRIBUTING TO EACH DATA COLLECTION:</strong> MOPER_2016 – National Sanitary Veterinary and Food Safety Authority MOPER_2017 – National Sanitary Veterinary and Food Safety Authority <strong>We are seeking feedback on our open data please complete the survey at the link below:<br> https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/9344dfa0-f384-cb72-65f6-6c187a6d0f14</strong>
description: RO; CSV; data.collection@efsa.europa.eu
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3785001
title: Romanian results from the monitoring of pesticide residues in food

description: This dataset contains the analytical results of pesticide residues measured in the food products analysed by the national competent authorities. Pesticide residues resulting from the use of plant protection products on crops that are used for food or feed production may pose a risk factor for public health. For this reason, a comprehensive legislative framework has been established in the European Union (EU), which defines rules for the approval of active substances used in plant protection products, the use of plant protection products and for pesticide residues in food. In order to ensure a high level of consumer protection, legal limits, so called “maximum residue levels” or briefly “MRLs”, are established in Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. EU-harmonised MRLs are set for all pesticides covering all types of food products. A default MRL of 0.01 mg/kg is applicable for pesticides not explicitly mentioned in the MRL legislation. Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 imposes on Member States the obligation to carry out controls to ensure that food placed on the market is compliant with the legal limits. A sample is considered <strong>free of quantifiable residues</strong> if the analytes were not present in concentrations at or above the limit of quantification (LOQ). The LOQ is the smallest concentration of an analyte that can be quantified with the analytical method used to analyse the sample. It is commonly defined as the minimum concentration of the analyte in the test sample that can be determined with acceptable precision and accuracy. If a sample is <strong>contains quantifiable residues</strong> but within the legally permitted limit (maximum residue level, MRL), it is described as a sample with quantified residue levels within the legal limits (below or at the MRL) A sample is considered <strong>non-compliant</strong> with the legal limit (MRL), if the measured residue concentrations clearly exceed the legal limits, taking into account the measurement uncertainty. It is current practice that the uncertainty of the analytical measurement is taken into account before legal or administrative sanctions are imposed on food business operators for infringement of the MRL legislation. <strong>REPORTING AUTHORITIES CONTRIBUTING TO EACH DATA COLLECTION:</strong> MOPER_2018 - National Sanitary Veterinary and Food Safety Authority MOPER_2017 - National Sanitary Veterinary and Food Safety Authority MOPER_2016 - National Sanitary Veterinary and Food Safety Authority MOPER_2015 - National Sanitary Veterinary and Food Safety Authority MOPER_2014 - National Sanitary Veterinary and Food Safety Authority MOPER_2013 - National Sanitary Veterinary and Food Safety Authority MOPER_2012 - National Sanitary Veterinary and Food Safety Authority MOPER_2011 - National Sanitary Veterinary and Food Safety Authority <strong>We are seeking feedback on our open data please complete the survey at the link below:<br> https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/9344dfa0-f384-cb72-65f6-6c187a6d0f14</strong>
description: RO; CSV; data.collection@efsa.europa.eu
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/5idc4h
title: Replication Data for: Effects of urban immigrants' public services access on non-housing consumption under housing pressure in China

description: original data of Effects of urban immigrants' public services access on non-housing consumption under housing pressure in China
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1323646
title: Slovakian Results From The Monitoring Of Pesticide Residues In Food

description: This dataset contains the analytical results of pesticide residues measured in the food products analysed by the national competent authorities. Pesticide residues resulting from the use of plant protection products on crops that are used for food or feed production may pose a risk factor for public health. For this reason, a comprehensive legislative framework has been established in the European Union (EU), which defines rules for the approval of active substances used in plant protection products, the use of plant protection products and for pesticide residues in food. In order to ensure a high level of consumer protection, legal limits, so called “maximum residue levels” or briefly “MRLs”, are established in Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. EU-harmonised MRLs are set for all pesticides covering all types of food products. A default MRL of 0.01 mg/kg is applicable for pesticides not explicitly mentioned in the MRL legislation. Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 imposes on Member States the obligation to carry out controls to ensure that food placed on the market is compliant with the legal limits.

A sample is considered <strong>free of quantifiable residues</strong> if the analytes were not present in concentrations at or above the limit of quantification (LOQ). The LOQ is the smallest concentration of an analyte that can be quantified with the analytical method used to analyse the sample. It is commonly defined as the minimum concentration of the analyte in the test sample that can be determined with acceptable precision and accuracy.

If a sample is <strong>contains quantifiable residues</strong> but within the legally permitted limit (maximum residue level, MRL), it is described as a sample  with quantified residue levels within the legal limits (below or at the MRL)

A sample is considered <strong>non-compliant</strong> with the legal limit (MRL), if the measured residue concentrations clearly exceed the legal limits, taking into account the measurement uncertainty. It is current practice that the uncertainty of the analytical measurement is taken into account before legal or administrative sanctions are imposed on food business operators for infringement of the MRL legislation.
description: data.collection@efsa.europa.eu
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2587892
title: Slovakian results from the monitoring of pesticide residues in food

description: This dataset contains the analytical results of pesticide residues measured in the food products analysed by the national competent authorities. Pesticide residues resulting from the use of plant protection products on crops that are used for food or feed production may pose a risk factor for public health. For this reason, a comprehensive legislative framework has been established in the European Union (EU), which defines rules for the approval of active substances used in plant protection products, the use of plant protection products and for pesticide residues in food. In order to ensure a high level of consumer protection, legal limits, so called “maximum residue levels” or briefly “MRLs”, are established in Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. EU-harmonised MRLs are set for all pesticides covering all types of food products. A default MRL of 0.01 mg/kg is applicable for pesticides not explicitly mentioned in the MRL legislation. Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 imposes on Member States the obligation to carry out controls to ensure that food placed on the market is compliant with the legal limits. A sample is considered <strong>free of quantifiable residues</strong> if the analytes were not present in concentrations at or above the limit of quantification (LOQ). The LOQ is the smallest concentration of an analyte that can be quantified with the analytical method used to analyse the sample. It is commonly defined as the minimum concentration of the analyte in the test sample that can be determined with acceptable precision and accuracy. If a sample is <strong>contains quantifiable residues</strong> but within the legally permitted limit (maximum residue level, MRL), it is described as a sample with quantified residue levels within the legal limits (below or at the MRL) A sample is considered <strong>non-compliant</strong> with the legal limit (MRL), if the measured residue concentrations clearly exceed the legal limits, taking into account the measurement uncertainty. It is current practice that the uncertainty of the analytical measurement is taken into account before legal or administrative sanctions are imposed on food business operators for infringement of the MRL legislation.
description: data.collection@efsa.europa.eu We are seeking feedback on our open data please complete the survey at the link below https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/9344dfa0-f384-cb72-65f6-6c187a6d0f14
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3243290
title: Slovakian results from the monitoring of pesticide residues in food

description: This dataset contains the analytical results of pesticide residues measured in the food products analysed by the national competent authorities. Pesticide residues resulting from the use of plant protection products on crops that are used for food or feed production may pose a risk factor for public health. For this reason, a comprehensive legislative framework has been established in the European Union (EU), which defines rules for the approval of active substances used in plant protection products, the use of plant protection products and for pesticide residues in food. In order to ensure a high level of consumer protection, legal limits, so called “maximum residue levels” or briefly “MRLs”, are established in Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. EU-harmonised MRLs are set for all pesticides covering all types of food products. A default MRL of 0.01 mg/kg is applicable for pesticides not explicitly mentioned in the MRL legislation. Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 imposes on Member States the obligation to carry out controls to ensure that food placed on the market is compliant with the legal limits. A sample is considered <strong>free of quantifiable residues</strong> if the analytes were not present in concentrations at or above the limit of quantification (LOQ). The LOQ is the smallest concentration of an analyte that can be quantified with the analytical method used to analyse the sample. It is commonly defined as the minimum concentration of the analyte in the test sample that can be determined with acceptable precision and accuracy. If a sample is <strong>contains quantifiable residues</strong> but within the legally permitted limit (maximum residue level, MRL), it is described as a sample with quantified residue levels within the legal limits (below or at the MRL) A sample is considered <strong>non-compliant</strong> with the legal limit (MRL), if the measured residue concentrations clearly exceed the legal limits, taking into account the measurement uncertainty. It is current practice that the uncertainty of the analytical measurement is taken into account before legal or administrative sanctions are imposed on food business operators for infringement of the MRL legislation. <strong>REPORTING AUTHORITIES CONTRIBUTING TO EACH DATA COLLECTION:</strong> MOPER_2016 – State Veterinary and Food Institute, Veterinary and Food Institute of Bratislava MOPER_2017 – State Veterinary and Food Institute, Veterinary and Food Institute of Bratislava <strong>We are seeking feedback on our open data please complete the survey at the link below:<br> https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/9344dfa0-f384-cb72-65f6-6c187a6d0f14</strong>
description: SK; CSV; data.collection@efsa.europa.eu
DOI: 10.15468/dl.ygq6df
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 28266 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "Country is Ecuador",
 "GadmGid is one of (ECU.8.3_1, ECU.8.1_1, ECU.8.4_1, ECU.8.5_1, ECU.14.16_1, ECU.14.10_1, ECU.14.21_1, ECU.14.3_1, ECU.14.8_1, ECU.14.11_1, ECU.14.14_1, ECU.21.2_1, ECU.21.1_1, ECU.13.2_1, ECU.13.8_1, ECU.13.12_1, ECU.13.13_1, ECU.10.11_1, ECU.10.7_1, ECU.10.21_1, ECU.10.6_1, ECU.10.14_1, ECU.10.22_1, ECU.10.16_1, ECU.20.3_1, ECU.20.2_1, ECU.20.1_1, ECU.7.8_1, ECU.7.13_1, ECU.7.10_1, ECU.7.6_1, ECU.7.1_1, ECU.4.6_1, ECU.4.3_1, ECU.4.4_1, ECU.11.3_1, ECU.11.4_1, ECU.11.2_1, ECU.11.1_1, ECU.19.6_1, ECU.19.1_1, ECU.19.7_1, ECU.19.8_1, ECU.6.2_1, ECU.6.5_1, ECU.6.4_1, ECU.6.6_1, ECU.23.1_1, ECU.23.2_1, ECU.23.7_1, ECU.23.8_1, ECU.2.5_1, ECU.2.7_1, ECU.2.2_1, ECU.5.10_1, ECU.5.1_1, ECU.5.6_1, ECU.5.4_1, ECU.3.1_1, ECU.3.2_1, ECU.3.3_1, ECU.3.5_1, ECU.1.3_1, ECU.1.7_1, ECU.1.10_1, ECU.1.2_1, ECU.12.7_1, ECU.12.2_1, ECU.7.14_1, ECU.22.4_1, ECU.22.6_1, ECU.16.5_1, ECU.16.1_1, ECU.16.3_1, ECU.17.4_1, ECU.17.2_1, ECU.18.4_1, ECU.18.2_1, ECU.18.5_1, ECU.15.1_1, ECU.15.3_1, ECU.15.5_1, ECU.24.9_1, ECU.24.8_1, ECU.24.2_1, ECU.9.2_1, ECU.9.3_1, ECU.9.1_1)",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present",
 "TaxonKey is Mammalia",
 "Year 1991-2021"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 28266 records from 48 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0030723-250426092105405/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.29064707
title: Print screens of the "No, you are not a misogynist" (Όχι, Δεν Είσαι Μισογύνης - ΟΔΕΜ) Facebook Page posts in January 2025

description: These are the posts (print screens) of the Facebook Page «No, you are not a misogynist» (Όχι, Δεν Είσαι Μισογύνης - ΟΔΕΜ) on January 2025, that are the corpus analysis of the manuscript: «The Greek Manosphere: The Case of the "No, you are not a misogynist" Facebook Page».
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15411763
title: cucumis_humifructus_zanfona_1.fasta.gz
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15411764
title: cucumis_humifructus_zanfona_1.fasta.gz
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15325257
title: Irish Folklore and Lady Gregory Adaptations (Plaintext Corpus)

description: This repository contains the plaintext files of fourteen English-language Irish folk tales, alongside fourteen English-language adaptations by Lady Gregory. The dataset enables comparative analysis of source material and its literary re-workings, offering insight into editorial style, adaptation practices, and the shaping of Irish cultural heritage through retelling.

The texts are suitable for use in digital humanities, literary studies, comparative folklore, stylometry, and natural language processing.

All files are encoded in UTF-8 and can be processed with standard text analysis tools.

This corpus was curated by researchers on the CASCADE project:https://www.horizoncascade.net/

CASCADE (101119511) is a Horizon Europe MSCA Doctoral Network funded by the European Commission and UKRI.

A selection of the original folk tales was kindly provided by the Corpus of Electronic Texts (CELT) project, University College Cork:https://celt.ucc.ie/

We are grateful for their work in preserving and making available Irish textual heritage.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15325258
title: Irish Folklore Corpus

description: This repository contains the plaintext files of fourteen English-language Irish folk tales, as well as fourteen English-language adaptations by Lady Gregory. 

Lady Gregory's text files are named in uppercase, and the corresponding original text files are named in lowercase. The metadata.xlsx file displays which of Gregory's texts correspond to the original texts.

A selection of these texts were kindly provided by the Corpus of Electronic Texts (CELT) project: https://celt.ucc.ie/
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15408113
title: Irish Folklore and Lady Gregory Adaptations (Plaintext Corpus)

description: This repository contains the plaintext files of fourteen English-language Irish folk tales, alongside fourteen English-language adaptations by Lady Gregory. The dataset enables comparative analysis of source material and its literary re-workings, offering insight into editorial style, adaptation practices, and the shaping of Irish cultural heritage through retelling.

The texts are suitable for use in digital humanities, literary studies, comparative folklore, stylometry, and natural language processing.

All files are encoded in UTF-8 and can be processed with standard text analysis tools.

This corpus was curated by researchers on the CASCADE project:https://www.horizoncascade.net/

CASCADE (101119511) is a Horizon Europe MSCA Doctoral Network funded by the European Commission and UKRI.

A selection of the original folk tales was kindly provided by the Corpus of Electronic Texts (CELT) project, University College Cork:https://celt.ucc.ie/

We are grateful for their work in preserving and making available Irish textual heritage.