cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.11583/dtu.19611333
title: Onshore wind generation time series for technology SP199 HH100 at resource grade A (PECD 2021 update)

description: This data (csv file) provides simulated hourly time series of onshore wind generation with specific power (SP) 199 W/m2 turbines at hub height (HH) of 100 m for the regions shown in the attached map. The analysed wind power plants are sited at the best 10 % of locations in each region, i.e., in resource grade (RG) A. The map shows the resulting capacity factors (annual mean). The Excel file gives a rough indication if this wind technology is suitable for the different regions for this RG or not. The available land considers all onshore land area of a region, except lakes, cities, and very high elevation locations. The possible impact of any existing onshore wind installations in the region is not considered. Wake losses are modeled, with additional 5 % of other losses and unavailability considered. The time stamps are in GMT; the variable (column) names relate to the region names shown in the maps. The data include also country-level aggregations, e.g., UK00 is the aggregated onshore wind generation of all the UK regions (weighted by regional installed capacities). The data are part of the variable renewable energy generation time series created for ENTSO-E in the 2021 update of the Pan-European Climate Database (PECD) dataset. ENTSO-E has used the data in ERAA 2021 and Winter Outlook 2021-2022 assessments, and they are used in TYNDP 2022. The simulations are carried out by DTU Wind Energy, with the future technology selection and data validation discussed and agreed with ENTSO-E and its members. The linked journal paper (1st link) describes the simulation methodology (combination of ERA5 and GWA data is used). It is requested that the paper is cited when the data are used. The linked related journal paper (2nd link) describes the concept of resource grades and how they can be applied in energy system analyses. This item is part of a larger collection of wind and solar data: https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.c.5939581
DOI: 10.11583/dtu.19611333.v1
title: Onshore wind generation time series for technology SP199 HH100 at resource grade A (PECD 2021 update)

description: This data (csv file) provides simulated hourly time series of onshore wind generation with specific power (SP) 199 W/m2 turbines at hub height (HH) of 100 m for the regions shown in the attached map. The analysed wind power plants are sited at the best 10 % of locations in each region, i.e., in resource grade (RG) A. The map shows the resulting capacity factors (annual mean). The Excel file gives a rough indication if this wind technology is suitable for the different regions for this RG or not. The available land considers all onshore land area of a region, except lakes, cities, and very high elevation locations. The possible impact of any existing onshore wind installations in the region is not considered. Wake losses are modeled, with additional 5 % of other losses and unavailability considered. The time stamps are in GMT; the variable (column) names relate to the region names shown in the maps. The data include also country-level aggregations, e.g., UK00 is the aggregated onshore wind generation of all the UK regions (weighted by regional installed capacities). The data are part of the variable renewable energy generation time series created for ENTSO-E in the 2021 update of the Pan-European Climate Database (PECD) dataset. ENTSO-E has used the data in ERAA 2021 and Winter Outlook 2021-2022 assessments, and they are used in TYNDP 2022. The simulations are carried out by DTU Wind Energy, with the future technology selection and data validation discussed and agreed with ENTSO-E and its members. The linked journal paper (1st link) describes the simulation methodology (combination of ERA5 and GWA data is used). It is requested that the paper is cited when the data are used. The linked related journal paper (2nd link) describes the concept of resource grades and how they can be applied in energy system analyses. This item is part of a larger collection of wind and solar data: https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.c.5939581
DOI: 10.11583/dtu.19689013
title: Onshore wind generation time series for technology SP277 HH150 at resource grade C (PECD 2021 update)

description: This data (csv file) provides simulated hourly time series of onshore wind generation with specific power (SP) 277 W/m2 turbines at hub height (HH) of 150 m for the regions shown in the attached map. The analysed wind power plants are sited at the 50 % lowest mean wind speed locations in each region, i.e., in resource grade (RG) C. The map shows the resulting capacity factors (annual mean). The Excel file gives a rough indication if this wind technology is suitable for the different regions for this RG or not. The available land considers all onshore land area of a region, except lakes, cities, and very high elevation locations. The possible impact of any existing onshore wind installations in the region is not considered. Wake losses are modeled, with additional 5 % of other losses and unavailability considered. The time stamps are in GMT; the variable (column) names relate to the region names shown in the maps. The data include also country-level aggregations, e.g., UK00 is the aggregated onshore wind generation of all the UK regions (weighted by regional installed capacities). The data are part of the variable renewable energy generation time series created for ENTSO-E in the 2021 update of the Pan-European Climate Database (PECD) dataset. ENTSO-E has used the data in ERAA 2021 and Winter Outlook 2021-2022 assessments, and they are used in TYNDP 2022. The simulations are carried out by DTU Wind Energy, with the future technology selection and data validation discussed and agreed with ENTSO-E and its members. The linked journal paper (1st link) describes the simulation methodology (combination of ERA5 and GWA data is used). It is requested that the paper is cited when the data are used. The linked related journal paper (2nd link) describes the concept of resource grades and how they can be applied in energy system analyses. This item is part of a larger collection of wind and solar data: https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.c.5939581
DOI: 10.11583/dtu.19689013.v1
title: Onshore wind generation time series for technology SP277 HH150 at resource grade C (PECD 2021 update)

description: This data (csv file) provides simulated hourly time series of onshore wind generation with specific power (SP) 277 W/m2 turbines at hub height (HH) of 150 m for the regions shown in the attached map. The analysed wind power plants are sited at the 50 % lowest mean wind speed locations in each region, i.e., in resource grade (RG) C. The map shows the resulting capacity factors (annual mean). The Excel file gives a rough indication if this wind technology is suitable for the different regions for this RG or not. The available land considers all onshore land area of a region, except lakes, cities, and very high elevation locations. The possible impact of any existing onshore wind installations in the region is not considered. Wake losses are modeled, with additional 5 % of other losses and unavailability considered. The time stamps are in GMT; the variable (column) names relate to the region names shown in the maps. The data include also country-level aggregations, e.g., UK00 is the aggregated onshore wind generation of all the UK regions (weighted by regional installed capacities). The data are part of the variable renewable energy generation time series created for ENTSO-E in the 2021 update of the Pan-European Climate Database (PECD) dataset. ENTSO-E has used the data in ERAA 2021 and Winter Outlook 2021-2022 assessments, and they are used in TYNDP 2022. The simulations are carried out by DTU Wind Energy, with the future technology selection and data validation discussed and agreed with ENTSO-E and its members. The linked journal paper (1st link) describes the simulation methodology (combination of ERA5 and GWA data is used). It is requested that the paper is cited when the data are used. The linked related journal paper (2nd link) describes the concept of resource grades and how they can be applied in energy system analyses. This item is part of a larger collection of wind and solar data: https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.c.5939581
DOI: 10.11583/dtu.19672881
title: Onshore wind generation time series for technology SP199 HH100 at resource grade B (PECD 2021 update)

description: This data (csv file) provides simulated hourly time series of onshore wind generation with specific power (SP) 199 W/m2 turbines at hub height (HH) of 100 m for the regions shown in the attached map. The analysed wind power plants are sited at the 10...50 % highest mean wind speed locations in each region, i.e., in resource grade (RG) B. The map shows the resulting capacity factors (annual mean). The Excel file gives a rough indication if this wind technology is suitable for the different regions for this RG or not. The available land considers all onshore land area of a region, except lakes, cities, and very high elevation locations. The possible impact of any existing onshore wind installations in the region is not considered. Wake losses are modeled, with additional 5 % of other losses and unavailability considered. The time stamps are in GMT; the variable (column) names relate to the region names shown in the maps. The data include also country-level aggregations, e.g., UK00 is the aggregated onshore wind generation of all the UK regions (weighted by regional installed capacities). The data are part of the variable renewable energy generation time series created for ENTSO-E in the 2021 update of the Pan-European Climate Database (PECD) dataset. ENTSO-E has used the data in ERAA 2021 and Winter Outlook 2021-2022 assessments, and they are used in TYNDP 2022. The simulations are carried out by DTU Wind Energy, with the future technology selection and data validation discussed and agreed with ENTSO-E and its members. The linked journal paper (1st link) describes the simulation methodology (combination of ERA5 and GWA data is used). It is requested that the paper is cited when the data are used. The linked related journal paper (2nd link) describes the concept of resource grades and how they can be applied in energy system analyses. This item is part of a larger collection of wind and solar data: https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.c.5939581
DOI: 10.11583/dtu.19672881.v1
title: Onshore wind generation time series for technology SP199 HH100 at resource grade B (PECD 2021 update)

description: This data (csv file) provides simulated hourly time series of onshore wind generation with specific power (SP) 199 W/m2 turbines at hub height (HH) of 100 m for the regions shown in the attached map. The analysed wind power plants are sited at the 10...50 % highest mean wind speed locations in each region, i.e., in resource grade (RG) B. The map shows the resulting capacity factors (annual mean). The Excel file gives a rough indication if this wind technology is suitable for the different regions for this RG or not. The available land considers all onshore land area of a region, except lakes, cities, and very high elevation locations. The possible impact of any existing onshore wind installations in the region is not considered. Wake losses are modeled, with additional 5 % of other losses and unavailability considered. The time stamps are in GMT; the variable (column) names relate to the region names shown in the maps. The data include also country-level aggregations, e.g., UK00 is the aggregated onshore wind generation of all the UK regions (weighted by regional installed capacities). The data are part of the variable renewable energy generation time series created for ENTSO-E in the 2021 update of the Pan-European Climate Database (PECD) dataset. ENTSO-E has used the data in ERAA 2021 and Winter Outlook 2021-2022 assessments, and they are used in TYNDP 2022. The simulations are carried out by DTU Wind Energy, with the future technology selection and data validation discussed and agreed with ENTSO-E and its members. The linked journal paper (1st link) describes the simulation methodology (combination of ERA5 and GWA data is used). It is requested that the paper is cited when the data are used. The linked related journal paper (2nd link) describes the concept of resource grades and how they can be applied in energy system analyses. This item is part of a larger collection of wind and solar data: https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.c.5939581
DOI: 10.11583/dtu.19689001
title: Onshore wind generation time series for technology SP277 HH100 at resource grade B (PECD 2021 update)

description: This data (csv file) provides simulated hourly time series of onshore wind generation with specific power (SP) 277 W/m2 turbines at hub height (HH) of 100 m for the regions shown in the attached map. The analysed wind power plants are sited at the 10...50 % highest mean wind speed locations in each region, i.e., in resource grade (RG) B. The map shows the resulting capacity factors (annual mean). The Excel file gives a rough indication if this wind technology is suitable for the different regions for this RG or not. The available land considers all onshore land area of a region, except lakes, cities, and very high elevation locations. The possible impact of any existing onshore wind installations in the region is not considered. Wake losses are modeled, with additional 5 % of other losses and unavailability considered. The time stamps are in GMT; the variable (column) names relate to the region names shown in the maps. The data include also country-level aggregations, e.g., UK00 is the aggregated onshore wind generation of all the UK regions (weighted by regional installed capacities). The data are part of the variable renewable energy generation time series created for ENTSO-E in the 2021 update of the Pan-European Climate Database (PECD) dataset. ENTSO-E has used the data in ERAA 2021 and Winter Outlook 2021-2022 assessments, and they are used in TYNDP 2022. The simulations are carried out by DTU Wind Energy, with the future technology selection and data validation discussed and agreed with ENTSO-E and its members. The linked journal paper (1st link) describes the simulation methodology (combination of ERA5 and GWA data is used). It is requested that the paper is cited when the data are used. The linked related journal paper (2nd link) describes the concept of resource grades and how they can be applied in energy system analyses. This item is part of a larger collection of wind and solar data: https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.c.5939581
DOI: 10.11583/dtu.19689001.v1
title: Onshore wind generation time series for technology SP277 HH100 at resource grade B (PECD 2021 update)

description: This data (csv file) provides simulated hourly time series of onshore wind generation with specific power (SP) 277 W/m2 turbines at hub height (HH) of 100 m for the regions shown in the attached map. The analysed wind power plants are sited at the 10...50 % highest mean wind speed locations in each region, i.e., in resource grade (RG) B. The map shows the resulting capacity factors (annual mean). The Excel file gives a rough indication if this wind technology is suitable for the different regions for this RG or not. The available land considers all onshore land area of a region, except lakes, cities, and very high elevation locations. The possible impact of any existing onshore wind installations in the region is not considered. Wake losses are modeled, with additional 5 % of other losses and unavailability considered. The time stamps are in GMT; the variable (column) names relate to the region names shown in the maps. The data include also country-level aggregations, e.g., UK00 is the aggregated onshore wind generation of all the UK regions (weighted by regional installed capacities). The data are part of the variable renewable energy generation time series created for ENTSO-E in the 2021 update of the Pan-European Climate Database (PECD) dataset. ENTSO-E has used the data in ERAA 2021 and Winter Outlook 2021-2022 assessments, and they are used in TYNDP 2022. The simulations are carried out by DTU Wind Energy, with the future technology selection and data validation discussed and agreed with ENTSO-E and its members. The linked journal paper (1st link) describes the simulation methodology (combination of ERA5 and GWA data is used). It is requested that the paper is cited when the data are used. The linked related journal paper (2nd link) describes the concept of resource grades and how they can be applied in energy system analyses. This item is part of a larger collection of wind and solar data: https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.c.5939581
DOI: 10.11583/dtu.19672887
title: Onshore wind generation time series for technology SP199 HH150 at resource grade B (PECD 2021 update)

description: This data (csv file) provides simulated hourly time series of onshore wind generation with specific power (SP) 199 W/m2 turbines at hub height (HH) of 150 m for the regions shown in the attached map. The analysed wind power plants are sited at the 10...50 % highest mean wind speed locations in each region, i.e., in resource grade (RG) B. The map shows the resulting capacity factors (annual mean). The Excel file gives a rough indication if this wind technology is suitable for the different regions for this RG or not. The available land considers all onshore land area of a region, except lakes, cities, and very high elevation locations. The possible impact of any existing onshore wind installations in the region is not considered. Wake losses are modeled, with additional 5 % of other losses and unavailability considered. The time stamps are in GMT; the variable (column) names relate to the region names shown in the maps. The data include also country-level aggregations, e.g., UK00 is the aggregated onshore wind generation of all the UK regions (weighted by regional installed capacities). The data are part of the variable renewable energy generation time series created for ENTSO-E in the 2021 update of the Pan-European Climate Database (PECD) dataset. ENTSO-E has used the data in ERAA 2021 and Winter Outlook 2021-2022 assessments, and they are used in TYNDP 2022. The simulations are carried out by DTU Wind Energy, with the future technology selection and data validation discussed and agreed with ENTSO-E and its members. The linked journal paper (1st link) describes the simulation methodology (combination of ERA5 and GWA data is used). It is requested that the paper is cited when the data are used. The linked related journal paper (2nd link) describes the concept of resource grades and how they can be applied in energy system analyses. This item is part of a larger collection of wind and solar data: https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.c.5939581
DOI: 10.11583/dtu.19672887.v1
title: Onshore wind generation time series for technology SP199 HH150 at resource grade B (PECD 2021 update)

description: This data (csv file) provides simulated hourly time series of onshore wind generation with specific power (SP) 199 W/m2 turbines at hub height (HH) of 150 m for the regions shown in the attached map. The analysed wind power plants are sited at the 10...50 % highest mean wind speed locations in each region, i.e., in resource grade (RG) B. The map shows the resulting capacity factors (annual mean). The Excel file gives a rough indication if this wind technology is suitable for the different regions for this RG or not. The available land considers all onshore land area of a region, except lakes, cities, and very high elevation locations. The possible impact of any existing onshore wind installations in the region is not considered. Wake losses are modeled, with additional 5 % of other losses and unavailability considered. The time stamps are in GMT; the variable (column) names relate to the region names shown in the maps. The data include also country-level aggregations, e.g., UK00 is the aggregated onshore wind generation of all the UK regions (weighted by regional installed capacities). The data are part of the variable renewable energy generation time series created for ENTSO-E in the 2021 update of the Pan-European Climate Database (PECD) dataset. ENTSO-E has used the data in ERAA 2021 and Winter Outlook 2021-2022 assessments, and they are used in TYNDP 2022. The simulations are carried out by DTU Wind Energy, with the future technology selection and data validation discussed and agreed with ENTSO-E and its members. The linked journal paper (1st link) describes the simulation methodology (combination of ERA5 and GWA data is used). It is requested that the paper is cited when the data are used. The linked related journal paper (2nd link) describes the concept of resource grades and how they can be applied in energy system analyses. This item is part of a larger collection of wind and solar data: https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.c.5939581
DOI: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2fd6nq
title: CCDC 2246063: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

description: Related Article: Sasikala Ravi, Mehboobali Pannipara, Abdullah G. Al-Sehemi, Dohyun Moon, Savarimuthu Philip Anthony|2023|J.Lumin.|263|120010|doi:10.1016/j.jlumin.2023.120010
description: An entry from the Cambridge Structural Database, the world’s repository for small molecule crystal structures. The entry contains experimental data from a crystal diffraction study. The deposited dataset for this entry is freely available from the CCDC and typically includes 3D coordinates, cell parameters, space group, experimental conditions and quality measures.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8134205
title: Characteristics and challenges of elderly entrepreneurs from Cyprus. Raw dataset from 37 semi-structured interviews

description: This dataset delves into the motivations and behaviours of elderly entrepreneurs in Cyprus - individuals who continue to engage in entrepreneurial activities past retirement age. Cypriot entrepreneurs often remain active post-retirement for varied reasons. The dataset includes qualitative data, collected in Cyprus (areas of Nicosia and Limassol), between the second half of 2018 and the first half of 2019. The dataset includes the transcripts in English of 37 semi-structured interviews.
description: The names of the interviewees are fantasy names.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8134204
title: Characteristics and challenges of elderly entrepreneurs from Cyprus. Raw dataset from 37 semi-structured interviews

description: This dataset delves into the motivations and behaviours of elderly entrepreneurs in Cyprus - individuals who continue to engage in entrepreneurial activities past retirement age. Cypriot entrepreneurs often remain active post-retirement for varied reasons. The dataset includes qualitative data, collected in Cyprus (areas of Nicosia and Limassol), between the second half of 2018 and the first half of 2019. The dataset includes the transcripts in English of 37 semi-structured interviews.
description: The names of the interviewees are fantasy names.
DOI: 10.11583/dtu.14501592
title: Quality controlled precipitation data from a disdrometer installed next to the tall Risø met mast, Denmark

description: This dataset consists of 1-minute and 20-seconds precipitation measurements observed with a OTT Parsivel2 installed on the ground next to the tall meteorological mast at DTU Risø campus. The period includes more than 3 years of measurements. See https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2021/1063 for more details about the station.
DOI: 10.11583/dtu.14501631
title: Quality controlled precipitation data from a disdrometer installed at Voulund, Denmark

description: This dataset consists of 1-minute precipitation measurements observed with a OTT Parsivel2 installed on the ground at Voulund, Denmark, a site of the Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI). The period includes around 1.67 years of measurements. See https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2021/1063 for more details about the station.