cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9630683
title: EC2_B76.nwb

description: The enclosed data is collected using a high-density 256-channel electrocorticography array implanted in a human patient during treatment for epilepsy. The subjects are reading aloud consonant-vowel syllables from a list. The data was collected by Dr. Edward Chang at the University of California, San Francisco, and curated by Ben Dichter.<br>Data is organized by subject ID, and each file is a continuous recording session in Neurodata Without Borders: Neurophysiology (NWB:N) 2.0 format. Voltage traces are included for each of the recorded 256 channels. Microphone signal was recorded at the time but is removed for HIPAA compliance. Detailed hand-marked annotations are provided which mark what syllable was said, and the times of the start, consonant-vowel transition, and end of each syllable. A rest-period time is also included when the subject was silent, which can be used as a baseline. Hand-marked anatomical labels are included for electrodes in the relevant brain regions. All dates have been removed for HIPAA compliance and replaced with Jan 1, 1900.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9630659
title: GP31_B82.nwb

description: The enclosed data is collected using a high-density 256-channel electrocorticography array implanted in a human patient during treatment for epilepsy. The subjects are reading aloud consonant-vowel syllables from a list. The data was collected by Dr. Edward Chang at the University of California, San Francisco, and curated by Ben Dichter.<br>Data is organized by subject ID, and each file is a continuous recording session in Neurodata Without Borders: Neurophysiology (NWB:N) 2.0 format. Voltage traces are included for each of the recorded 256 channels. Microphone signal was recorded at the time but is removed for HIPAA compliance. Detailed hand-marked annotations are provided which mark what syllable was said, and the times of the start, consonant-vowel transition, and end of each syllable. A rest-period time is also included when the subject was silent, which can be used as a baseline. Hand-marked anatomical labels are included for electrodes in the relevant brain regions. All dates have been removed for HIPAA compliance and replaced with Jan 1, 1900.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9630659.v1
title: GP31_B82.nwb

description: The enclosed data is collected using a high-density 256-channel electrocorticography array implanted in a human patient during treatment for epilepsy. The subjects are reading aloud consonant-vowel syllables from a list. The data was collected by Dr. Edward Chang at the University of California, San Francisco, and curated by Ben Dichter.<br>Data is organized by subject ID, and each file is a continuous recording session in Neurodata Without Borders: Neurophysiology (NWB:N) 2.0 format. Voltage traces are included for each of the recorded 256 channels. Microphone signal was recorded at the time but is removed for HIPAA compliance. Detailed hand-marked annotations are provided which mark what syllable was said, and the times of the start, consonant-vowel transition, and end of each syllable. A rest-period time is also included when the subject was silent, which can be used as a baseline. Hand-marked anatomical labels are included for electrodes in the relevant brain regions. All dates have been removed for HIPAA compliance and replaced with Jan 1, 1900.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9630683.v1
title: EC2_B76.nwb

description: The enclosed data is collected using a high-density 256-channel electrocorticography array implanted in a human patient during treatment for epilepsy. The subjects are reading aloud consonant-vowel syllables from a list. The data was collected by Dr. Edward Chang at the University of California, San Francisco, and curated by Ben Dichter.<br>Data is organized by subject ID, and each file is a continuous recording session in Neurodata Without Borders: Neurophysiology (NWB:N) 2.0 format. Voltage traces are included for each of the recorded 256 channels. Microphone signal was recorded at the time but is removed for HIPAA compliance. Detailed hand-marked annotations are provided which mark what syllable was said, and the times of the start, consonant-vowel transition, and end of each syllable. A rest-period time is also included when the subject was silent, which can be used as a baseline. Hand-marked anatomical labels are included for electrodes in the relevant brain regions. All dates have been removed for HIPAA compliance and replaced with Jan 1, 1900.
DOI: 10.23641/asha.9630599
title: Bang for your buck: CAS tx amount distribution (Maas et al., 2019)

description: <b>Purpose: </b>The aim of this study was to examine 2 aspects of treatment intensity in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech (CAS): practice amount and practice distribution.<b>Method: </b>Using an alternating-treatments single-subject design with multiple baselines, we compared high versus low amount of practice, and massed versus distributed practice, in 6 children with CAS. Conditions were manipulated in the context of integral stimulation treatment. Changes in perceptual accuracy, scored by blinded analysts, were quantified with effect sizes.<b>Results: </b>Four children showed an advantage for high amount of practice, 1 showed an opposite effect, and 1 showed no condition difference. For distribution, 4 children showed a clear advantage for massed over distributed practice post treatment; 1 showed an opposite pattern, and 1 showed no clear difference. Follow-up revealed a similar pattern. All children demonstrated treatment effects (larger gains for treated than untreated items).<b>Conclusions: </b>High practice amount and massed practice were associated with more robust speech motor learning in most children with CAS, compared to low amount and distributed practice, respectively. Variation in effects across children warrants further research to determine factors that predict optimal treatment conditions. Finally, this study adds to the evidence base supporting the efficacy of integral stimulation treatment for CAS.<br><b>Supplemental Material S1. </b>Detailed information about the items sets for each child, including the items and the condition matching information. <br>Maas, E., Gildersleeve-Neumann, C., Jakielski, K., Kovacs, N., Stoeckel, R., Vradelis, H. & Welsh, M. (2019). Bang for your buck: A single-case experimental design study of practice amount and distribution in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. <i>Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. </i>Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0212
DOI: 10.23641/asha.9630599.v1
title: Bang for your buck: CAS tx amount distribution (Maas et al., 2019)

description: <b>Purpose: </b>The aim of this study was to examine 2 aspects of treatment intensity in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech (CAS): practice amount and practice distribution.<b>Method: </b>Using an alternating-treatments single-subject design with multiple baselines, we compared high versus low amount of practice, and massed versus distributed practice, in 6 children with CAS. Conditions were manipulated in the context of integral stimulation treatment. Changes in perceptual accuracy, scored by blinded analysts, were quantified with effect sizes.<b>Results: </b>Four children showed an advantage for high amount of practice, 1 showed an opposite effect, and 1 showed no condition difference. For distribution, 4 children showed a clear advantage for massed over distributed practice post treatment; 1 showed an opposite pattern, and 1 showed no clear difference. Follow-up revealed a similar pattern. All children demonstrated treatment effects (larger gains for treated than untreated items).<b>Conclusions: </b>High practice amount and massed practice were associated with more robust speech motor learning in most children with CAS, compared to low amount and distributed practice, respectively. Variation in effects across children warrants further research to determine factors that predict optimal treatment conditions. Finally, this study adds to the evidence base supporting the efficacy of integral stimulation treatment for CAS.<br><b>Supplemental Material S1. </b>Detailed information about the items sets for each child, including the items and the condition matching information. <br>Maas, E., Gildersleeve-Neumann, C., Jakielski, K., Kovacs, N., Stoeckel, R., Vradelis, H. & Welsh, M. (2019). Bang for your buck: A single-case experimental design study of practice amount and distribution in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. <i>Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. </i>Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0212
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9628406
title: Data and code for "Imprinting sets the stage for speciation"

description: This dataset contains empirical data, simulation results and code for statistical analysis and mathematical models for the manuscript "Imprinting sets the stage for speciation".<br>[Rearing Experiment]RearingData.csv: empirical data<br>Rearing Experiment Stats.Rmd: R code for statistical analysis<br><br>[Population Genetic Models]Population Genetic Model.nb: Mathematica code of the population genetic model<br><br>Numerical Analysis Results.Rmd: R code for visualizing the numerical analysis results<br>Effects of Starting Frequency.Rmd: R code for visualizing the simulation of different starting frequency<br>All other csv files are simulation results from the Mathematica file, all of which would be imported when running the two R markdown files above.<br><br><br><br>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9627803
title: EC9_B15.nwb

description: The enclosed data is collected using a high-density 256-channel electrocorticography array implanted in a human patient during treatment for epilepsy. The subjects are reading aloud consonant-vowel syllables from a list. The data was collected by Dr. Edward Chang at the University of California, San Francisco, and curated by Ben Dichter.<br>Data is organized by subject ID, and each file is a continuous recording session in Neurodata Without Borders: Neurophysiology (NWB:N) 2.0 format. Voltage traces are included for each of the recorded 256 channels. Microphone signal was recorded at the time but is removed for HIPAA compliance. Detailed hand-marked annotations are provided which mark what syllable was said, and the times of the start, consonant-vowel transition, and end of each syllable. A rest-period time is also included when the subject was silent, which can be used as a baseline. Hand-marked anatomical labels are included for electrodes in the relevant brain regions. All dates have been removed for HIPAA compliance and replaced with Jan 1, 1900.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9627257
title: Enterococcus faecalis gel band mass spectrometry

description: Raw mass spectrometry data obtained from excised gel bands.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9627257.v1
title: Enterococcus faecalis gel band mass spectrometry

description: Raw mass spectrometry data obtained from excised gel bands.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9627803.v1
title: EC9_B15.nwb

description: The enclosed data is collected using a high-density 256-channel electrocorticography array implanted in a human patient during treatment for epilepsy. The subjects are reading aloud consonant-vowel syllables from a list. The data was collected by Dr. Edward Chang at the University of California, San Francisco, and curated by Ben Dichter.<br>Data is organized by subject ID, and each file is a continuous recording session in Neurodata Without Borders: Neurophysiology (NWB:N) 2.0 format. Voltage traces are included for each of the recorded 256 channels. Microphone signal was recorded at the time but is removed for HIPAA compliance. Detailed hand-marked annotations are provided which mark what syllable was said, and the times of the start, consonant-vowel transition, and end of each syllable. A rest-period time is also included when the subject was silent, which can be used as a baseline. Hand-marked anatomical labels are included for electrodes in the relevant brain regions. All dates have been removed for HIPAA compliance and replaced with Jan 1, 1900.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9623765
title: data.rar

description: <b>Cyclicality of Fiscal Policy, Election Year and 2007 Crisis, Evidence from OECD countries (1980-2017)</b>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9622313
title: Psoriasis patient preferences for topical drugs: A systematic review

description: Search Strategy<br>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9623765.v1
title: data.rar

description: <b>Cyclicality of Fiscal Policy, Election Year and 2007 Crisis, Evidence from OECD countries (1980-2017)</b>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9622313.v1
title: Psoriasis patients’ preferences for topical drugs: A systematic review

description: Search Strategy<br>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9622313.v3
title: Psoriasis patient preferences for topical drugs: A systematic review

description: Search Strategy<br>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9622313.v2
title: Psoriasis patient preferences for topical drugs: A systematic review

description: Search Strategy<br>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9619571
title: Simulated phenotypes and markers applied to splitting methods of validation sets based on entropy and mutual information

description: The file "pheno_tbv.txt" contains the individuals' code, phenotype and true breeding value for simulated data.<br>The file "markers.txt" contains all the markers coded as 0, 1 or 2 in the columns and individuals in the rows for simulated data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9618143
title: YEAR 1 Figshare anonymous.sav

description: These are the results of kindergartners taught either patterning, early literacy, or mathematics. instruction was conducted in 15 minute sessions three times weekly for 3-5 months.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9618143.v1
title: YEAR 1 Figshare anonymous.sav

description: These are the results of kindergartners taught either patterning, early literacy, or mathematics. instruction was conducted in 15 minute sessions three times weekly for 3-5 months.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9617540
title: EC2_B15.nwb

description: The enclosed data is collected using a high-density 256-channel electrocorticography array implanted in a human patient during treatment for epilepsy. The subjects are reading aloud consonant-vowel syllables from a list. The data was collected by Dr. Edward Chang at the University of California, San Francisco, and curated by Ben Dichter.<br>Data is organized by subject ID, and each file is a continuous recording session in Neurodata Without Borders: Neurophysiology (NWB:N) 2.0 format. Voltage traces are included for each of the recorded 256 channels. Microphone signal was recorded at the time but is removed for HIPAA compliance. Detailed hand-marked annotations are provided which mark what syllable was said, and the times of the start, consonant-vowel transition, and end of each syllable. A rest-period time is also included when the subject was silent, which can be used as a baseline. Hand-marked anatomical labels are included for electrodes in the relevant brain regions. All dates have been removed for HIPAA compliance and replaced with Jan 1, 1900.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9617540.v1
title: EC2_B15.nwb

description: The enclosed data is collected using a high-density 256-channel electrocorticography array implanted in a human patient during treatment for epilepsy. The subjects are reading aloud consonant-vowel syllables from a list. The data was collected by Dr. Edward Chang at the University of California, San Francisco, and curated by Ben Dichter.<br>Data is organized by subject ID, and each file is a continuous recording session in Neurodata Without Borders: Neurophysiology (NWB:N) 2.0 format. Voltage traces are included for each of the recorded 256 channels. Microphone signal was recorded at the time but is removed for HIPAA compliance. Detailed hand-marked annotations are provided which mark what syllable was said, and the times of the start, consonant-vowel transition, and end of each syllable. A rest-period time is also included when the subject was silent, which can be used as a baseline. Hand-marked anatomical labels are included for electrodes in the relevant brain regions. All dates have been removed for HIPAA compliance and replaced with Jan 1, 1900.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9617561
title: EC2_B89.nwb

description: The enclosed data is collected using a high-density 256-channel electrocorticography array implanted in a human patient during treatment for epilepsy. The subjects are reading aloud consonant-vowel syllables from a list. The data was collected by Dr. Edward Chang at the University of California, San Francisco, and curated by Ben Dichter.<br>Data is organized by subject ID, and each file is a continuous recording session in Neurodata Without Borders: Neurophysiology (NWB:N) 2.0 format. Voltage traces are included for each of the recorded 256 channels. Microphone signal was recorded at the time but is removed for HIPAA compliance. Detailed hand-marked annotations are provided which mark what syllable was said, and the times of the start, consonant-vowel transition, and end of each syllable. A rest-period time is also included when the subject was silent, which can be used as a baseline. Hand-marked anatomical labels are included for electrodes in the relevant brain regions. All dates have been removed for HIPAA compliance and replaced with Jan 1, 1900.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9617561.v1
title: EC2_B89.nwb

description: The enclosed data is collected using a high-density 256-channel electrocorticography array implanted in a human patient during treatment for epilepsy. The subjects are reading aloud consonant-vowel syllables from a list. The data was collected by Dr. Edward Chang at the University of California, San Francisco, and curated by Ben Dichter.<br>Data is organized by subject ID, and each file is a continuous recording session in Neurodata Without Borders: Neurophysiology (NWB:N) 2.0 format. Voltage traces are included for each of the recorded 256 channels. Microphone signal was recorded at the time but is removed for HIPAA compliance. Detailed hand-marked annotations are provided which mark what syllable was said, and the times of the start, consonant-vowel transition, and end of each syllable. A rest-period time is also included when the subject was silent, which can be used as a baseline. Hand-marked anatomical labels are included for electrodes in the relevant brain regions. All dates have been removed for HIPAA compliance and replaced with Jan 1, 1900.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9616385
title: Supplementary Material for: How to Intervene in the Root Caries Process? Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

description: The aim of this review as part of the preparation for a workshop organized by the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry (EFCD) in conjunction with the European Organisation for Caries Research (ORCA) was to systematically analyze available evidence of non-, micro- as well as invasive interventions for root caries lesions (RCLs). For each treatment strategy, a separate systematic review was either performed (micro-invasive and choice of restorative material) or updated (non-invasive and excavation technique) each of them following PRISMA guidelines, and if possible meta-analyses were performed. Besides the general advice to improve tooth brushing with fluoride toothpaste main findings for non-invasive interventions in RCLs, the use of dentifrices containing 5,000 ppm F<sup>–</sup> as well as professionally applied chlorhexidine varnish or silver diamine fluoride seemed to be more efficacious to arrest root caries compared to conventional fluoride toothpaste or placebo respectively. However, this conclusion is based only on a few randomized clinical trials. For micro-invasive treatments, only 2 studies focusing on sealants were available without clear conclusions. A recent review on the comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment compared with conventional treatment concluded that there is insufficient data to clearly rule out if any difference with regard to restoration longevity between both techniques exists. When restoring coventionally, composites performed better than resin-modified and glass ionomer cements. However, all materials showed rather high annual failure rates in the majority of the studies and evidence is based on a low number of prospective studies with a rather high risk of bias.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9616385.v1
title: Supplementary Material for: How to Intervene in the Root Caries Process? Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

description: The aim of this review as part of the preparation for a workshop organized by the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry (EFCD) in conjunction with the European Organisation for Caries Research (ORCA) was to systematically analyze available evidence of non-, micro- as well as invasive interventions for root caries lesions (RCLs). For each treatment strategy, a separate systematic review was either performed (micro-invasive and choice of restorative material) or updated (non-invasive and excavation technique) each of them following PRISMA guidelines, and if possible meta-analyses were performed. Besides the general advice to improve tooth brushing with fluoride toothpaste main findings for non-invasive interventions in RCLs, the use of dentifrices containing 5,000 ppm F<sup>–</sup> as well as professionally applied chlorhexidine varnish or silver diamine fluoride seemed to be more efficacious to arrest root caries compared to conventional fluoride toothpaste or placebo respectively. However, this conclusion is based only on a few randomized clinical trials. For micro-invasive treatments, only 2 studies focusing on sealants were available without clear conclusions. A recent review on the comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment compared with conventional treatment concluded that there is insufficient data to clearly rule out if any difference with regard to restoration longevity between both techniques exists. When restoring coventionally, composites performed better than resin-modified and glass ionomer cements. However, all materials showed rather high annual failure rates in the majority of the studies and evidence is based on a low number of prospective studies with a rather high risk of bias.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.9613865
title: Supplementary Material for: Electroencephalography in Psychiatric Surgery: Past Use and Future Directions

description: The last two decades have seen a re-emergence of surgery for intractable psychiatric disease, in large part due to increased use of deep brain stimulation. The development of more precise, image-guided, less invasive interventions has improved the safety of these procedures, even though the relative merits of modulation at various targets remain under investigation. With an increase in the number and type of interventions for modulating mood/anxiety circuits, the need for biomarkers to guide surgeries and predict treatment response is as critical as ever. Electroencephalography (EEG) has a long history in clinical neurology, cognitive neuroscience, and functional neurosurgery, but has limited prior usage in psychiatric surgery. MEDLINE, Embase, and Psyc-INFO searches on the use of EEG in guiding psychiatric surgery yielded 611 articles, which were screened for relevance and quality. We synthesized three important themes. First, considerable evidence supports EEG as a biomarker for response to various surgical and non-surgical therapies, but large-scale investigations are lacking. Second, intraoperative EEG is likely more valuable than surface EEG for guiding target selection, but comes at the cost of greater invasiveness. Finally, EEG may be a promising tool for objective functional feedback in developing “closed-loop” psychosurgeries, but more systematic investigations are required.