cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6611-1
title: National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative: Cancer Awareness Measure, Mount Vernon Cancer Network, 2010
title: Cancer Awareness Measures
title: Cancer Awareness in Hertfordshire, Luton and South Bedfordshire; NAEDI-CAM

description: &lt;p&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Cancer Awareness Measure&lt;/span&gt; (CAM) was developed in 2007-8 to address the absence of a validated measure of general public awareness of cancer (Stubbings, S., Robb, K., Waller, J., Ramirez, A., Austoker, J., Macleod, U., Hion, S., and Wardle, J. (2009) 'Development of a measurement tool to assess public awareness of cancer', British Journal of Cancer, 101(2), S13-S17.).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The survey includes measures of awareness of signs and symptoms of cancer, cancer risk factors, age-related risk, screening programmes and potential barriers to seeing the GP. Since then, Cancer Research UK (CRUK) has significantly revised and updated the survey, including a wider range of questions and collecting data online instead of face-to-face. The CAM was also previously known as the National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative Cancer Awareness Measure (NAEDI-CAM).&lt;/p&gt; This survey was carried out using the Cancer Research UK &lt;i&gt;Cancer Awareness Measure&lt;/i&gt; (CAM), a validated instrument developed by University College London, King's College London and University of Oxford. It is used to assess the level of awareness and anticipated help-seeking behaviour amongst the public in relation to cancer. The survey was conducted across the Mount Vernon Cancer Network area. This comprises Luton, South Bedfordshire, West Hertfordshire and East and North Hertfordshire Primary Care Trusts (PCTs). The survey took place prior to the merger of the two Hertfordshire PCTs.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
A total of 2,018 interviews were conducted face-to-face with residents using CAPI (Computer Aided Personal Interviewing) technology (users should note that the data file includes only 1,251 cases). Interviews took place between February and May 2010. During interviewing, quotas were set for PCT, age, gender and ethnicity to ensure the sample represented as closely as possible the population of the Mount Vernon Cancer Network area. Upon completion of the interview, respondents were provided with an information sheet which gave them the answers to the questions contained within the interview, as well as providing details of support services should they require further information or wish to discuss anything that the survey had highlighted. For further details, please see documentation. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6615-1
title: Social, Economic and Environmental Implications of Increasing Rural Land Use under Energy Crops, 2006-2009
title: Impacts of Increasing Land Use under Energy Crops; RELU-BIOMASS

description: &lt;p&gt;This is a mixed method data collection. The study is part of the Rural Economy and Land Use (RELU) programme.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;This project integrated social, economic, hydrological and biodiversity studies in an interdisciplinary approach to assess the impacts of converting land to &lt;i&gt;Miscanthus&lt;/i&gt; grass and short-rotation coppice (SRC) willows. The approach adopted was the Sustainability Appraisal Framework, more commonly used in land-use planning. Two contrasting farming systems were focussed on: the arable-dominated East Midlands; and grassland-dominated South West England. The multi-disciplinary team of researchers studied social acceptability of introducing SRC willows and Miscanthus grass in these areas, in addition to water-use studies, GIS-based suitability mapping, farm and regional economics studies and biodiversity impacts. Data generated include a public attitudes survey, measures of focal indicator taxa, GIS visualisations and hydrological measurements.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;The analysis of public attitudes was based upon a public questionnaire survey, focus group meetings with community groups, insights from stakeholder meetings, and interviews with key industry and local government officers. In total the views of over 550 people contribute to the findings. The questionnaire survey sought to ascertain the general level of knowledge and approval of various renewable energy sources, understanding of the term biomass, and specific knowledge of Miscanthus and SRC. Photographs of the crops were used as a visual aid and to gather views on the acceptability of introducing Miscanthus and SRC into the local landscape setting. GIS-based computer generated real-time landscape models, and other computer generated static images were produced and used alongside photographs in more in-depth interviews and focus groups. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://data.ceh.ac.uk/metadata/70b0258a-a903-4a7e-8588-1481af7b4dc7"&gt;Ecology&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://data.ceh.ac.uk/metadata/647f7fe0-68d7-4d58-ac6b-19d96f0d790a"&gt;hydrology&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://data.ceh.ac.uk/metadata/19ff63b5-67db-4b71-8318-a346cd4cfe98"&gt;GIS&lt;/a&gt; data from this study are available at the Environmental Information Data Centre of the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Further information for this study may be found through the &lt;a href="https://www.researchcatalogue.esrc.ac.uk/grants/RES-227-25-0020/read" target="_blank"&gt;ESRC Research Catalogue webpage: Social, Economic and Environmental Implications of Increasing Rural Land Use under Energy Crops.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://relu.data-archive.ac.uk/explore-data/search-browse/project/?ID=RES-227-25-0020"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6638-1
title: Scottish Social Attitudes Survey, 2009
title: Scottish Social Attitudes Survey, 1999-
title: SSA

description: The &lt;i&gt;Scottish Social Attitudes&lt;/i&gt; (SSA) survey was launched by ScotCen Social Research (formerly the Scottish Centre for Social Research) in 1999, following the advent of devolution. Based on annual rounds of interviews of between 1,200 to 1,500 people drawn using probability sampling (based on a stratified, clustered sample), it aims to facilitate the study of public opinion and inform the development of public policy in Scotland, similar to the &lt;i&gt;British Social Attitudes&lt;/i&gt; (BSA) series (held at the Archive under GN 33168). The SSA survey has been conducted annually each year since 1999, with the exception of 2008. The survey has a modular structure. In any one year it typically contains three to five modules, each containing 40 questions. Funding for its first two years came from the Economic and Social Research Council, while from 2001 onwards different bodies have funded individual modules each year. These bodies have included the Economic and Social Research Council, the Scottish Government and various charitable and grant awarding bodies, such as the Nuffield Foundation and Leverhulme Trust. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Further information on the SSA and links to publications may be found on the ScotCen Social Research &lt;a href="https://natcen.ac.uk/search?series%5B43%5D=43" title="Scottish Social Attitudes" target="_blank"&gt;Scottish Social Attitudes&lt;/a&gt; webpages.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
 The 2009 survey was the tenth wave in the series. The sample included a boost of addresses in remote and rural parts of Scotland.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6639-1
title: British Gambling Prevalence Survey, 1999
title: British Gambling Prevalence Surveys, 1999-
title: BGPS; British Gambling Prevalence Survey, 2000

description: The &lt;i&gt;British Gambling Prevalence Survey&lt;/i&gt; is a large-scale nationally representative survey of participation in gambling and the prevalence of problem gambling in Great Britain.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The aims of the survey series are:&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;measure the prevalence of participation in all forms of commercial and private gambling (including estimates of expenditure and information on venue)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;estimate the prevalence of ‘problem gambling’ and look at which activities have the highest prevalence of ‘problem gamblers’ &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;investigate the socio-demographic factors associated with gambling and with ‘problem gambling’&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;assess attitudes towards gambling&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;Further information about the series can be found on the Gambling Commission's &lt;a href="http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/research__consultations/research/bgps.aspx" title ="British Gambling Prevalence Surveys"&gt;&lt;i&gt;British Gambling Prevalence Surveys&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; web pages.&lt;br&gt;
 &lt;i&gt;British Gambling Prevalence Survey, 1999&lt;/i&gt; is the first survey in the series. The National Centre for Social Research (NatCen) was commissioned by GamCare to carry out the first-ever survey of the Lottery and other gambling activities in Britain. GamCare is a national charity that promotes responsible gambling and monitors the social impact of gambling. In 1999, after the National Lottery was created and a wide range of gambling activities were available, this study was designed to find out who gambles, and on what. Most people enjoy gambling, and do so within sensible limits. A small number, however, get into severe problems with their gambling. Therefore an important aspect of this survey was to examine rates of problem gambling among the British population and to assess which gambling activities cause problems and for whom.&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6640-1
title: National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative: Cancer Awareness Measure, Merseyside and Cheshire, 2010
title: Cancer Awareness Measures
title: Cancer Awareness Measure: Merseyside and Cheshire, 2010; NAEDI-CAM

description: &lt;p&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Cancer Awareness Measure&lt;/span&gt; (CAM) was developed in 2007-8 to address the absence of a validated measure of general public awareness of cancer (Stubbings, S., Robb, K., Waller, J., Ramirez, A., Austoker, J., Macleod, U., Hion, S., and Wardle, J. (2009) 'Development of a measurement tool to assess public awareness of cancer', British Journal of Cancer, 101(2), S13-S17.).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The survey includes measures of awareness of signs and symptoms of cancer, cancer risk factors, age-related risk, screening programmes and potential barriers to seeing the GP. Since then, Cancer Research UK (CRUK) has significantly revised and updated the survey, including a wider range of questions and collecting data online instead of face-to-face. The CAM was also previously known as the National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative Cancer Awareness Measure (NAEDI-CAM).&lt;/p&gt; As part of the wider cancer strategy, the NHS Cancer Action Team funded the Merseyside and Cheshire Cancer Network (MCCN) to survey levels of cancer awareness in the local population. The MCCN subsequently commissioned the University of Liverpool to carry out this work.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The aims of the survey were to contribute to the national picture of levels of cancer awareness and generate evidence to support MCCN strategies for identifying and addressing inequalities across the network. The survey used the nationally validated Cancer Awareness Measure (CAM) which has been developed by a Cancer Research UK team to assess awareness of cancer amongst the general population. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Respondents were identified from a random sample of 5,250 residents accessed through the edited versions on the Electoral Rolls for the MCCN region. The MCCN region includes seven Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) (Liverpool PCT, Warrington PCT, Wirral PCT, Halton and St Helens PCT, Knowsley PCT, Sefton PCT, Western Cheshire PCT).&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6641-1
title: Ahead of the Game Survey, 2009-2010
title: Cancer Awareness Measures
title: National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative: Cancer Awareness Measure; NAEDI-CAM

description: &lt;p&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Cancer Awareness Measure&lt;/span&gt; (CAM) was developed in 2007-8 to address the absence of a validated measure of general public awareness of cancer (Stubbings, S., Robb, K., Waller, J., Ramirez, A., Austoker, J., Macleod, U., Hion, S., and Wardle, J. (2009) 'Development of a measurement tool to assess public awareness of cancer', British Journal of Cancer, 101(2), S13-S17.).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The survey includes measures of awareness of signs and symptoms of cancer, cancer risk factors, age-related risk, screening programmes and potential barriers to seeing the GP. Since then, Cancer Research UK (CRUK) has significantly revised and updated the survey, including a wider range of questions and collecting data online instead of face-to-face. The CAM was also previously known as the National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative Cancer Awareness Measure (NAEDI-CAM).&lt;/p&gt; The Ahead of the Game campaign explored the use of targeted interventions at football grounds as a means of raising the awareness of the causes and symptoms of cancer. The target audience for these interventions was primarily male football supporters aged over 55. In order to investigate this, Ipsos MORI conducted two waves of survey research amongst men aged over 40 at the five football clubs where the interventions have taken place (Blackburn Rovers, Brighton and Hove Albion, Norwich City, Portsmouth, and Scunthorpe United), using the Cancer Awareness Measure (CAM). The reason that men over 40 were interviewed instead of just men aged over 55, was to assess the impact on those approaching the most at risk age group, to compare the impact of the interventions on the different age groups, and to inform decisions on future campaigns targeting the younger group.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Supporters were recruited face-to-face in and around the clubs on match days and contacted by telephone to complete the survey. The pre-intervention survey developed a ‘baseline’ that was compared with the post-intervention survey to measure any change in awareness. Some clubs had started to conduct their interventions when the pre-intervention wave of research was in field, so some respondents may have been influenced by the interventions before they were interviewed. During both waves 1,000 supporters were interviewed in total (200 per club) creating an overall total of 2,000 responses (400 per club).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Further information about the Ahead of the Game campaign can be found on the &lt;a href ="http://www.footballfoundation.org.uk/our-schemes/ahead-of-the-game/" title="Ahead of the Game"&gt;Football Foundation's&lt;/a&gt; web page.&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6643-1
title: National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative: Cancer Awareness Measure, Lambeth, 2009-2010
title: Cancer Awareness Measures
title: Cancer Awareness Measure, Lambeth; NAEDI-CAM

description: &lt;p&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Cancer Awareness Measure&lt;/span&gt; (CAM) was developed in 2007-8 to address the absence of a validated measure of general public awareness of cancer (Stubbings, S., Robb, K., Waller, J., Ramirez, A., Austoker, J., Macleod, U., Hion, S., and Wardle, J. (2009) 'Development of a measurement tool to assess public awareness of cancer', British Journal of Cancer, 101(2), S13-S17.).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The survey includes measures of awareness of signs and symptoms of cancer, cancer risk factors, age-related risk, screening programmes and potential barriers to seeing the GP. Since then, Cancer Research UK (CRUK) has significantly revised and updated the survey, including a wider range of questions and collecting data online instead of face-to-face. The CAM was also previously known as the National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative Cancer Awareness Measure (NAEDI-CAM).&lt;/p&gt; This survey was carried out in the London Borough of Lambeth using the nationally validated Cancer Awareness Measure (CAM). BMG Research conducted the survey on behalf of Lambeth Primary Care Trust (PCT) and the South East London Cancer Network (SELCN). A total of 2,298 interviews were conducted face-to-face with residents using CAPI (Computer Aided Personal Interviewing) technology. During interviewing, quotas were set for ward, age, and ethnicity and deprivation quintile to ensure the sample represented as closely as possible the population of Lambeth. The sample included a boost sample of 261 Black African residents, as the SELCN were particularly interested in the levels of awareness and perception of cancer amongst this ethnic community.&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6645-1
title: National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative: Cervical Cancer Awareness Measure Benchmarking Survey, 2009
title: Cancer Awareness Measures
title: Cervical Cancer Awareness Measure: Benchmarking Survey, 2009; NAEDI-CAM

description: &lt;p&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Cancer Awareness Measure&lt;/span&gt; (CAM) was developed in 2007-8 to address the absence of a validated measure of general public awareness of cancer (Stubbings, S., Robb, K., Waller, J., Ramirez, A., Austoker, J., Macleod, U., Hion, S., and Wardle, J. (2009) 'Development of a measurement tool to assess public awareness of cancer', British Journal of Cancer, 101(2), S13-S17.).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The survey includes measures of awareness of signs and symptoms of cancer, cancer risk factors, age-related risk, screening programmes and potential barriers to seeing the GP. Since then, Cancer Research UK (CRUK) has significantly revised and updated the survey, including a wider range of questions and collecting data online instead of face-to-face. The CAM was also previously known as the National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative Cancer Awareness Measure (NAEDI-CAM).&lt;/p&gt; This survey was designed to benchmark current levels of knowledge about cervical cancer among women in England. The survey will allow an evaluation of the success of the Department of Health’s key messages on cervical cancer in raising cervical cancer awareness. The survey made use of the Cervical Cancer Awareness Measure (Cervical CAM), which was developed by the Cervical Cancer Awareness and Symptoms Initiative (CCASI), a tripartite collaboration between the Department of Health, the Eve Appeal, and University College London’s Health Behaviour Research Centre. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The survey was carried out in November-December 2009, prior to the launch on the Department of Health’s key messages on cervical cancer in January 2010. A sample of 1,392 women in England aged 16 years and over completed a questionnaire on a laptop, in their own homes. The sample was selected using random location sampling, and was weighted to ensure that it was representative of women in England.&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6648-1
title: National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative: Cancer Awareness Measure, Barnsley, Bassetlaw, Doncaster and Sheffield, 2008
title: Cancer Awareness Measures
title: Cancer Awareness Measure, Barnsley, Bassetlaw, Doncaster and Sheffield; NAEDI-CAM

description: &lt;p&gt;The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Cancer Awareness Measure&lt;/span&gt; (CAM) was developed in 2007-8 to address the absence of a validated measure of general public awareness of cancer (Stubbings, S., Robb, K., Waller, J., Ramirez, A., Austoker, J., Macleod, U., Hion, S., and Wardle, J. (2009) 'Development of a measurement tool to assess public awareness of cancer', British Journal of Cancer, 101(2), S13-S17.).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The survey includes measures of awareness of signs and symptoms of cancer, cancer risk factors, age-related risk, screening programmes and potential barriers to seeing the GP. Since then, Cancer Research UK (CRUK) has significantly revised and updated the survey, including a wider range of questions and collecting data online instead of face-to-face. The CAM was also previously known as the National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative Cancer Awareness Measure (NAEDI-CAM).&lt;/p&gt; This survey was carried out in the Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) of Barnsley, Bassetlaw, Doncaster and Sheffield using the nationally validated Cancer Awareness Measure (CAM). The aim was to provide a baseline assessment of cancer awareness amongst adults living in the areas served by these four PCTs. They also aim to highlight differences in awareness by age, gender and socio-economic factors.&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-6649-1
title: Additional Scales on High Involvement Management, Family-Friendly Management and Lean Production from the Workplace Employee Relations Survey, 2004
title: High Involvement Management, Employee Well-Being and Organisational Performance; WERS 2004

description: &lt;i&gt;Additional Scales on High Involvement Management, Family-Friendly Management and Lean Production from the Workplace Employee Relations Survey, 2004&lt;/i&gt; investigates how the implementation of such employment approaches can be linked to employee well-being and organisational performance. High involvement management (HIM) involves such organisational practices as team-working, flexible job descriptions and other arrangements which encourage greater flexibility and collaboration along with acquiring the skills and knowledge required to optimise working in teams. Lean production entails practices which facilitate the timely and efficient procurement and delivery of goods and services. Family-friendly policies are aimed at helping employees by providing flexitime working and access to facilities which support the achievement of an optimal work-life balance.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; This study used data from &lt;i&gt; Workplace Employee Relations Survey, 2004&lt;/i&gt; (WERS 2004) (available from the UK Data Archive under SN 5294). Analysis procedures involved state-of-the-art statistical analysis, including latent variable analysis, multi-level modelling, path analysis and configuration analysis. The dataset deposited at the Archive includes four variables; one unique reference number which can be matched against the WERS 2004 data and 3 trait score variables.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; Further information can be found on the ESRC &lt;a href="http://www.esrc.ac.uk/my-esrc/grants/RES-000-23-1482/read" title ="High Involvement Management, Employee Well-Being and Organisational Performance"&gt;High Involvement Management, Employee Well-Being and Organisational Performance&lt;/a&gt; award web page.&lt;br&gt;