cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15142376
title: TABLE 1 in A new subfamily of ulmarid scyphomedusae, the Santjordiinae, with a description of Santjordia pagesi gen. et sp. nov. (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa: Discomedusae: Semaeostomeae: Ulmaridae) from the Sumisu Caldera, Ogasawara Islands, Japan

description: TABLE 1. Scyphozoan specimens examined morphologically and sequenced (16S) for the present work.
Species16SSequenceSample IDImage VouchersCruiseDateDepth (m)Sampling locationAccession No.IDLat.Long.LocationDeepstaria enigmaticaON391156DLSI014HD98SS1a (NSMT-Co 1404)doi 10.5281/ zenodo.6475523 doi 10.5281/ zenodo.6480763R/V Kaiyo, KY02- 0622-Apr-200266941˚00’N144˚41’EJapan TrenchDesmonemaDLSI110UM12_RMT200_Dgdoi 10.5281/TRV Umitaka10-Feb-20080–20066°35.5’S144°1.5’ESouthernglacialeON391153zenodo.6471770Maru, CEAMARCOceanDes. glacialeON391152DLSI126UM42_IYGPT500_Dgn.a.TRV Umitaka Maru, CEAMARC6-Feb-20080–50066˚19.8’S140˚02.3’ESouthern OceanDiplulmaris antarcticaON391163DLSI116UM25_RMT-S-8-2_Dan.a.TRV Umitaka Maru, CEAMARC7-Feb-200850–10066°20’S141°22’ESouthern OceanPelagia noctilucaON391151DLSI223RHB_MOC-1-2-7_Pnn.a. (1.5 cm diameter)R/V Ronald H. Brown, RHB06-0316-Apr-200625–5029°55’N70°03’WCarribean SeaPoralia rufescensON391159DLSI070UM16_RMT-D-8-2_Prn.a.TRV Umitaka Maru, CEAMARC31-Jan-2008500–100063°S140°’ESouthern OceanPo. rufescensON391161DLSI114UM17_RMT-D-8-1_Prdoi 10.5281/ zenodo.6471820TRV Umitaka Maru, CEAMARC29-Jan-2008500–100063°30.1’S139°59.8’ESouthern OceanPo. rufescensON391162DLSI3112K1201SS4b_Pr_juvdoi 10.5281/ zenodo.6472194R/V Natsushima, NT00-08-36-Jul-2000113635˚09’N139˚13.656’ESagami Bay, JapanPo. rufescensON391160DLSI221RHB_MOC-10-1-4_Prn.a.R/V Ronald H. Brown, RHB06-0315-Apr-20061000–300033°40’N69°30’WCarribean SeaSantjordia pagesi sp. nov.ON391158DLSI063HD84GS1adoi 10.5281/ zenodo.6426355 doi 10.5281/ zenodo.6420570 doi 10.5281/ zenodo.6424652R/V Kaiyo Cruise KY02-0310-Mar-200278931°28.3’N140°04’ESumisu Caldera, JapanStygiomedusa giganteaON391154DLSI035UM15_RMT-D-8- 2_Sgn.a.TRV Umitaka Maru, CEAMARC30-Jan-2008200–50062°31.3’S139°58.5’ESouthern OceanSt. giganteaON391155DLSI163UM14_IYGPT500_Sgdoi 10.5281/ zenodo.6471790TRV Umitaka Maru, CEAMARC29-Jan-20080–50062°1.5’S140°2.5’ESouthern OceanTiburonia granrojoON391157DLSI004HD99SS1a (NSMT-Co 1405)doi 10.5281/ zenodo.6476641R/V Kaiyo, KY02- 0623-Apr-200298641˚00’N144˚42’EJapan Trench
description: Published as part of Lindsay, Dhugal John, Grossmann, Mary Matilda, Montenegro, Javier & Morandini, André Carrara, 2023, A new subfamily of ulmarid scyphomedusae, the Santjordiinae, with a description of Santjordia pagesi gen. et sp. nov. (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa: Discomedusae: Semaeostomeae: Ulmaridae) from the Sumisu Caldera, Ogasawara Islands, Japan, pp. 535 in Zootaxa 5374 (4) on page 535, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5374.4.5, http://zenodo.org/record/10159050
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15142377
title: TABLE 1 in A new subfamily of ulmarid scyphomedusae, the Santjordiinae, with a description of Santjordia pagesi gen. et sp. nov. (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa: Discomedusae: Semaeostomeae: Ulmaridae) from the Sumisu Caldera, Ogasawara Islands, Japan

description: TABLE 1. Scyphozoan specimens examined morphologically and sequenced (16S) for the present work.
Species16SSequenceSample IDImage VouchersCruiseDateDepth (m)Sampling locationAccession No.IDLat.Long.LocationDeepstaria enigmaticaON391156DLSI014HD98SS1a (NSMT-Co 1404)doi 10.5281/ zenodo.6475523 doi 10.5281/ zenodo.6480763R/V Kaiyo, KY02- 0622-Apr-200266941˚00’N144˚41’EJapan TrenchDesmonemaDLSI110UM12_RMT200_Dgdoi 10.5281/TRV Umitaka10-Feb-20080–20066°35.5’S144°1.5’ESouthernglacialeON391153zenodo.6471770Maru, CEAMARCOceanDes. glacialeON391152DLSI126UM42_IYGPT500_Dgn.a.TRV Umitaka Maru, CEAMARC6-Feb-20080–50066˚19.8’S140˚02.3’ESouthern OceanDiplulmaris antarcticaON391163DLSI116UM25_RMT-S-8-2_Dan.a.TRV Umitaka Maru, CEAMARC7-Feb-200850–10066°20’S141°22’ESouthern OceanPelagia noctilucaON391151DLSI223RHB_MOC-1-2-7_Pnn.a. (1.5 cm diameter)R/V Ronald H. Brown, RHB06-0316-Apr-200625–5029°55’N70°03’WCarribean SeaPoralia rufescensON391159DLSI070UM16_RMT-D-8-2_Prn.a.TRV Umitaka Maru, CEAMARC31-Jan-2008500–100063°S140°’ESouthern OceanPo. rufescensON391161DLSI114UM17_RMT-D-8-1_Prdoi 10.5281/ zenodo.6471820TRV Umitaka Maru, CEAMARC29-Jan-2008500–100063°30.1’S139°59.8’ESouthern OceanPo. rufescensON391162DLSI3112K1201SS4b_Pr_juvdoi 10.5281/ zenodo.6472194R/V Natsushima, NT00-08-36-Jul-2000113635˚09’N139˚13.656’ESagami Bay, JapanPo. rufescensON391160DLSI221RHB_MOC-10-1-4_Prn.a.R/V Ronald H. Brown, RHB06-0315-Apr-20061000–300033°40’N69°30’WCarribean SeaSantjordia pagesi sp. nov.ON391158DLSI063HD84GS1adoi 10.5281/ zenodo.6426355 doi 10.5281/ zenodo.6420570 doi 10.5281/ zenodo.6424652R/V Kaiyo Cruise KY02-0310-Mar-200278931°28.3’N140°04’ESumisu Caldera, JapanStygiomedusa giganteaON391154DLSI035UM15_RMT-D-8- 2_Sgn.a.TRV Umitaka Maru, CEAMARC30-Jan-2008200–50062°31.3’S139°58.5’ESouthern OceanSt. giganteaON391155DLSI163UM14_IYGPT500_Sgdoi 10.5281/ zenodo.6471790TRV Umitaka Maru, CEAMARC29-Jan-20080–50062°1.5’S140°2.5’ESouthern OceanTiburonia granrojoON391157DLSI004HD99SS1a (NSMT-Co 1405)doi 10.5281/ zenodo.6476641R/V Kaiyo, KY02- 0623-Apr-200298641˚00’N144˚42’EJapan Trench
description: Published as part of Lindsay, Dhugal John, Grossmann, Mary Matilda, Montenegro, Javier & Morandini, André Carrara, 2023, A new subfamily of ulmarid scyphomedusae, the Santjordiinae, with a description of Santjordia pagesi gen. et sp. nov. (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa: Discomedusae: Semaeostomeae: Ulmaridae) from the Sumisu Caldera, Ogasawara Islands, Japan, pp. 535 in Zootaxa 5374 (4) on page 535, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5374.4.5, http://zenodo.org/record/10159050
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15142384
title: Table 1 in Genetic diversity and biochemical analysis of Capsicum annuum (Bell pepper) in response to root and basal rot disease, Phytophthora capsici

description: Table 1 Mean squares of variance analysis of inoculation treatment for biomass parameters in susceptible and resistant pepper genotypes to root and basal rot disease, caused by Phytophthora capsici, Root Fresh Weight (RFW), Root Dry Weight (RDW), Stem Fresh Weight (SFW), Stem Dry Weight (SDW), Stem Diameter (SD), Root Diameter (RD), Stem length (SL), Root Length (RL), Root Volume (RV) and Leaf length (LL).
S.O.VDFMean Square (M.S)RFW (g)RDW (g)SFW (g)SDW (g)SD (mm)RD (mm)SL (cm)RL (cm)RV (mm3)LL (cm)Inoculation treatment (A) Genotype (B) Interaction AB1 5 50.423** 0.096ns 0.101ns0.0012 ns 0.0020** 0.0025**4.79** 5.23** 0.64ns0.050** 0.140** 0.018*1.323* 0.204 ns 0.445ns0.291 ns 1.259ns 0.772ns0.18 ns 17.30** 1.08ns15.96** 9.03 ns 6.58ns7.48** 1.28** 0.93*9.32** 3.04** 0.57nsError600.1500.00040.390.0070.3120.6044.334.190.340.70C.V%23.015.122.624.216.219.813.120.624.113.5
* = Significant at 5 % probability level, ** = Significant at 1 % probability level, ns = Not significant, DF = degree of freedom, CV = coefficient of variation.
description: Published as part of Mohammadbagheri, Leila, Nasr-Esfahani, Mehdi, Abdossi, Vahid & Naderi, Davood, 2021, Genetic diversity and biochemical analysis of Capsicum annuum (Bell pepper) in response to root and basal rot disease, Phytophthora capsici, pp. 2 in Phytochemistry (112884) 190 on page 2, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2021.112884, http://zenodo.org/record/8257941
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15142385
title: Table 1 in Genetic diversity and biochemical analysis of Capsicum annuum (Bell pepper) in response to root and basal rot disease, Phytophthora capsici

description: Table 1 Mean squares of variance analysis of inoculation treatment for biomass parameters in susceptible and resistant pepper genotypes to root and basal rot disease, caused by Phytophthora capsici, Root Fresh Weight (RFW), Root Dry Weight (RDW), Stem Fresh Weight (SFW), Stem Dry Weight (SDW), Stem Diameter (SD), Root Diameter (RD), Stem length (SL), Root Length (RL), Root Volume (RV) and Leaf length (LL).
S.O.VDFMean Square (M.S)RFW (g)RDW (g)SFW (g)SDW (g)SD (mm)RD (mm)SL (cm)RL (cm)RV (mm3)LL (cm)Inoculation treatment (A) Genotype (B) Interaction AB1 5 50.423** 0.096ns 0.101ns0.0012 ns 0.0020** 0.0025**4.79** 5.23** 0.64ns0.050** 0.140** 0.018*1.323* 0.204 ns 0.445ns0.291 ns 1.259ns 0.772ns0.18 ns 17.30** 1.08ns15.96** 9.03 ns 6.58ns7.48** 1.28** 0.93*9.32** 3.04** 0.57nsError600.1500.00040.390.0070.3120.6044.334.190.340.70C.V%23.015.122.624.216.219.813.120.624.113.5
* = Significant at 5 % probability level, ** = Significant at 1 % probability level, ns = Not significant, DF = degree of freedom, CV = coefficient of variation.
description: Published as part of Mohammadbagheri, Leila, Nasr-Esfahani, Mehdi, Abdossi, Vahid & Naderi, Davood, 2021, Genetic diversity and biochemical analysis of Capsicum annuum (Bell pepper) in response to root and basal rot disease, Phytophthora capsici, pp. 2 in Phytochemistry (112884) 190 on page 2, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2021.112884, http://zenodo.org/record/8257941
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15142387
title: Table 2 in Genetic diversity and biochemical analysis of Capsicum annuum (Bell pepper) in response to root and basal rot disease, Phytophthora capsici

description: Table 2 Mean comparison of the individual effect of inoculation treatment for the evaluated biomass parameters, for susceptible and resitant pepper genotypes to root and basal rot disease, caused by Phytophthora capsici, Root Fresh Weight (RFW), Root Dry Weight (RDW), Stem Fresh Weight (SFW), Stem Dry Weight (SDW), Stem Diameter (SD), Root Diameter (RD), Stem length (SL), Root Length (RL), Root Volume (RV) and Leaf length (LL).
Inoculation treatmentRFWRDWSFWSDWSDRDSLRLRVLL(g)(g)(g)(g)(mm)(cm)(cm)(cm)(mm3)(cm)Non-infected Infected1.760a 1.607b0.139 a 0.131a3.026a 2.510b0.367a 0.314b3.59b 3.32a3.98 a 3.86a15.91a 15.81a10.39 a 9.45b2.76b 2.11a6.54a 5.82bStatistical level1 %1 %1 %1 %5 %1 %1 %1 %1 %1 %Genotype groupRFWRDWSFWSDWSDRDSLRLRVLL(g)(g)(g)(g)(mm)(cm)(cm)(cm)(mm3)(cm)Resistant1.722a0.140a3.255a0.413a3.53a4.18a16.70a9.75a2.67a6.51aSusceptible1.645a0.131a2.280b0.267b3.38a3.67b15.03b10.09a2.19b5.86bStatistical level5 %5 %1 %1 %5 %1 %1 %5 %1 %1 %Inoculation treatment × Genotypes (I × G)RFWRDWSFWSDWSDRDSLRLRVLL(g)(g)(g)(g)(mm)(cm)(cm)(cm)(mm3)(cm)Non-infected19OrnP-PBI1.665 ab0.130cd4.333a0.612a3.79 ab4.10 ab18.10a9.43b2.00cd7.52a23CherryP-Orsh1.650 ab0.165 ab3.922 ab0.470b3.30abcd4.10 ab16.87 ab9.32b2.50bcd7.37 ab37ChilP-Paleo1.725 ab0.168a2.577cde0.313cde3.11cd3.78 ab15.12 ab10.02 ab2.50bcd6.07c2BP-PBI1.387b0.125d2.385cde0.273e3.05d3.68 ab15.47 ab10.10 ab1.67d6.13bc24BP-3011.625 ab0.113d2.528cde0.275de3.15bcd3.60 ab14.98 ab13.00a2.00cd5.97c26BP-RStarlet1.590 ab0.133cd2.408cde0.257e3.51abcd3.88 ab14.95 ab10.47 ab2.00cd6.22bcInfected19OrnP-PBI1.708 ab0.120d3.030bcd0.415bc3.51abcd4.17 ab17.25 ab10.30 ab3.20 ab6.38abc23CherryP-Orsh1.605 ab0.120d3.132bc0.400bcd3.83a4.63a17.00 ab9.83b2.33bcd6.02c37ChilP-Paleo1.980a0.135bcd2.538cde0.270e3.62abcd4.27 ab15.85 ab9.60b3.50a5.73c2BP-PBI1.832 ab0.160abc2.193cde0.295cde3.71abc3.46 ab15.80 ab8.28b2.80abc5.77c24BP-3011.640 ab0.120d2.162de0.272e3.47abcd4.19 ab14.62b10.23 ab2.20cd5.57c26BP-RStarlet1.797 ab0.132cd2.003e0.232e3.40abcd3.19b14.37b8.43b2.50bcd5.48cStatistical level5 %1 %1 %1 %5 %1 %1 %1 %1 %1 %
- Means in each column having same letter are not significantly different according to LSD test. - The heights and diameters are in centimeter (cm.) weights in grams (gr.) and volumes in millimeters (mm 3.).
description: Published as part of Mohammadbagheri, Leila, Nasr-Esfahani, Mehdi, Abdossi, Vahid & Naderi, Davood, 2021, Genetic diversity and biochemical analysis of Capsicum annuum (Bell pepper) in response to root and basal rot disease, Phytophthora capsici, pp. 3 in Phytochemistry (112884) 190 on page 3, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2021.112884, http://zenodo.org/record/8257941
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15142386
title: Table 2 in Genetic diversity and biochemical analysis of Capsicum annuum (Bell pepper) in response to root and basal rot disease, Phytophthora capsici

description: Table 2 Mean comparison of the individual effect of inoculation treatment for the evaluated biomass parameters, for susceptible and resitant pepper genotypes to root and basal rot disease, caused by Phytophthora capsici, Root Fresh Weight (RFW), Root Dry Weight (RDW), Stem Fresh Weight (SFW), Stem Dry Weight (SDW), Stem Diameter (SD), Root Diameter (RD), Stem length (SL), Root Length (RL), Root Volume (RV) and Leaf length (LL).
Inoculation treatmentRFWRDWSFWSDWSDRDSLRLRVLL(g)(g)(g)(g)(mm)(cm)(cm)(cm)(mm3)(cm)Non-infected Infected1.760a 1.607b0.139 a 0.131a3.026a 2.510b0.367a 0.314b3.59b 3.32a3.98 a 3.86a15.91a 15.81a10.39 a 9.45b2.76b 2.11a6.54a 5.82bStatistical level1 %1 %1 %1 %5 %1 %1 %1 %1 %1 %Genotype groupRFWRDWSFWSDWSDRDSLRLRVLL(g)(g)(g)(g)(mm)(cm)(cm)(cm)(mm3)(cm)Resistant1.722a0.140a3.255a0.413a3.53a4.18a16.70a9.75a2.67a6.51aSusceptible1.645a0.131a2.280b0.267b3.38a3.67b15.03b10.09a2.19b5.86bStatistical level5 %5 %1 %1 %5 %1 %1 %5 %1 %1 %Inoculation treatment × Genotypes (I × G)RFWRDWSFWSDWSDRDSLRLRVLL(g)(g)(g)(g)(mm)(cm)(cm)(cm)(mm3)(cm)Non-infected19OrnP-PBI1.665 ab0.130cd4.333a0.612a3.79 ab4.10 ab18.10a9.43b2.00cd7.52a23CherryP-Orsh1.650 ab0.165 ab3.922 ab0.470b3.30abcd4.10 ab16.87 ab9.32b2.50bcd7.37 ab37ChilP-Paleo1.725 ab0.168a2.577cde0.313cde3.11cd3.78 ab15.12 ab10.02 ab2.50bcd6.07c2BP-PBI1.387b0.125d2.385cde0.273e3.05d3.68 ab15.47 ab10.10 ab1.67d6.13bc24BP-3011.625 ab0.113d2.528cde0.275de3.15bcd3.60 ab14.98 ab13.00a2.00cd5.97c26BP-RStarlet1.590 ab0.133cd2.408cde0.257e3.51abcd3.88 ab14.95 ab10.47 ab2.00cd6.22bcInfected19OrnP-PBI1.708 ab0.120d3.030bcd0.415bc3.51abcd4.17 ab17.25 ab10.30 ab3.20 ab6.38abc23CherryP-Orsh1.605 ab0.120d3.132bc0.400bcd3.83a4.63a17.00 ab9.83b2.33bcd6.02c37ChilP-Paleo1.980a0.135bcd2.538cde0.270e3.62abcd4.27 ab15.85 ab9.60b3.50a5.73c2BP-PBI1.832 ab0.160abc2.193cde0.295cde3.71abc3.46 ab15.80 ab8.28b2.80abc5.77c24BP-3011.640 ab0.120d2.162de0.272e3.47abcd4.19 ab14.62b10.23 ab2.20cd5.57c26BP-RStarlet1.797 ab0.132cd2.003e0.232e3.40abcd3.19b14.37b8.43b2.50bcd5.48cStatistical level5 %1 %1 %1 %5 %1 %1 %1 %1 %1 %
- Means in each column having same letter are not significantly different according to LSD test. - The heights and diameters are in centimeter (cm.) weights in grams (gr.) and volumes in millimeters (mm 3.).
description: Published as part of Mohammadbagheri, Leila, Nasr-Esfahani, Mehdi, Abdossi, Vahid & Naderi, Davood, 2021, Genetic diversity and biochemical analysis of Capsicum annuum (Bell pepper) in response to root and basal rot disease, Phytophthora capsici, pp. 3 in Phytochemistry (112884) 190 on page 3, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2021.112884, http://zenodo.org/record/8257941
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15142389
title: Table 3 in Genetic diversity and biochemical analysis of Capsicum annuum (Bell pepper) in response to root and basal rot disease, Phytophthora capsici

description: Table 3 Analysis of variance of different pepper genotypes at transplanting and maturity stages to damping-up disease, Phytophthora capcisi.
S.VD.FS.SM.SF.SGrowth stage Genotype Growth stage × Genotype1 36 36132951.9 187130.1 72820.5132951.9 5198.1 2022.82432.3** 95.1** 37.00**Error1488089.854.7–Total221400992.3–
Screening tests were performed for all genotypes in a greenhouse with average temperature of 25 ± 2 ◦ C, relative humidity of about 60 % and a photoperiod of approximately 12–14 h daylight.*Bell Pepper-Red-Hybrid –Starlet.**The Joy of Plants.CO.UK. Means in each column having same letter are not significantly different according to LSD test.
description: Published as part of Mohammadbagheri, Leila, Nasr-Esfahani, Mehdi, Abdossi, Vahid & Naderi, Davood, 2021, Genetic diversity and biochemical analysis of Capsicum annuum (Bell pepper) in response to root and basal rot disease, Phytophthora capsici, pp. 3 in Phytochemistry (112884) 190 on page 3, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2021.112884, http://zenodo.org/record/8257941
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15142388
title: Table 3 in Genetic diversity and biochemical analysis of Capsicum annuum (Bell pepper) in response to root and basal rot disease, Phytophthora capsici

description: Table 3 Analysis of variance of different pepper genotypes at transplanting and maturity stages to damping-up disease, Phytophthora capcisi.
S.VD.FS.SM.SF.SGrowth stage Genotype Growth stage × Genotype1 36 36132951.9 187130.1 72820.5132951.9 5198.1 2022.82432.3** 95.1** 37.00**Error1488089.854.7–Total221400992.3–
Screening tests were performed for all genotypes in a greenhouse with average temperature of 25 ± 2 ◦ C, relative humidity of about 60 % and a photoperiod of approximately 12–14 h daylight.*Bell Pepper-Red-Hybrid –Starlet.**The Joy of Plants.CO.UK. Means in each column having same letter are not significantly different according to LSD test.
description: Published as part of Mohammadbagheri, Leila, Nasr-Esfahani, Mehdi, Abdossi, Vahid & Naderi, Davood, 2021, Genetic diversity and biochemical analysis of Capsicum annuum (Bell pepper) in response to root and basal rot disease, Phytophthora capsici, pp. 3 in Phytochemistry (112884) 190 on page 3, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2021.112884, http://zenodo.org/record/8257941
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15142390
title: Table 4 in Genetic diversity and biochemical analysis of Capsicum annuum (Bell pepper) in response to root and basal rot disease, Phytophthora capsici

description: Table 4 The impact of used pepper genotypes, including; Genotype number, Registered name, Company, Mortality rate/Stages (%) at Transplanting and Maturity stage, and the Means and reaction to root and basal rot disease, caused by Phytophthora capsici.
S/Genotype No.RegisteredOriginPropertiesCompanyMortality rate/Stages (%)Reaction to P. capsiciNonameTransplantingMaturityMeanstagestage13737ChilP-PaleoNetherlandChili-PaleoEWSI2b ± 1.30b ± 0.01b ± 0.8Resistant21919OrnP-PBIIranOrnamentalPBI13b ± 1.90b ± 0.07b ± 3.1Resistant32323CherryP-OrshUKCherry-The Joy**13b ± 1.30b ± 0.07b ± 3.0ResistantJerusalem422BP-PBIUKBell PepperPBI100a ± 0.0100a ± 0.0100a ± 0.0Susceptible52424BP-301USABell Pepper-301Fresh Farms US100 a ± 0.0100 a ± 0.0100 a ± 0.0Susceptible62626BP-RStarletSpainBell Pepper-Red*PBI100 a ± 0.0100 a ± 0.0100 a ± 0.0Susceptible
- C.V = 12.4 %.
- Means in each column having same letter are not significantly different according to LSD test.
description: Published as part of Mohammadbagheri, Leila, Nasr-Esfahani, Mehdi, Abdossi, Vahid & Naderi, Davood, 2021, Genetic diversity and biochemical analysis of Capsicum annuum (Bell pepper) in response to root and basal rot disease, Phytophthora capsici, pp. 3 in Phytochemistry (112884) 190 on page 3, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2021.112884, http://zenodo.org/record/8257941
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15142391
title: Table 4 in Genetic diversity and biochemical analysis of Capsicum annuum (Bell pepper) in response to root and basal rot disease, Phytophthora capsici

description: Table 4 The impact of used pepper genotypes, including; Genotype number, Registered name, Company, Mortality rate/Stages (%) at Transplanting and Maturity stage, and the Means and reaction to root and basal rot disease, caused by Phytophthora capsici.
S/Genotype No.RegisteredOriginPropertiesCompanyMortality rate/Stages (%)Reaction to P. capsiciNonameTransplantingMaturityMeanstagestage13737ChilP-PaleoNetherlandChili-PaleoEWSI2b ± 1.30b ± 0.01b ± 0.8Resistant21919OrnP-PBIIranOrnamentalPBI13b ± 1.90b ± 0.07b ± 3.1Resistant32323CherryP-OrshUKCherry-The Joy**13b ± 1.30b ± 0.07b ± 3.0ResistantJerusalem422BP-PBIUKBell PepperPBI100a ± 0.0100a ± 0.0100a ± 0.0Susceptible52424BP-301USABell Pepper-301Fresh Farms US100 a ± 0.0100 a ± 0.0100 a ± 0.0Susceptible62626BP-RStarletSpainBell Pepper-Red*PBI100 a ± 0.0100 a ± 0.0100 a ± 0.0Susceptible
- C.V = 12.4 %.
- Means in each column having same letter are not significantly different according to LSD test.
description: Published as part of Mohammadbagheri, Leila, Nasr-Esfahani, Mehdi, Abdossi, Vahid & Naderi, Davood, 2021, Genetic diversity and biochemical analysis of Capsicum annuum (Bell pepper) in response to root and basal rot disease, Phytophthora capsici, pp. 3 in Phytochemistry (112884) 190 on page 3, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2021.112884, http://zenodo.org/record/8257941
DOI: 10.15468/dl.yehaxa
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 21188 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "TaxonKey" : [
 "is Giraffidae"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 21188 records from 144 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0005987-250402121839773/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15142394
title: Table 1 in New species of Acanthochondria Oakley, 1930 and Chondracanthus Delaroche, 1811 (Copepoda: Cyclopoida: Chondracanthidae) parasitizing marine fishes from Indian waters

description: Table 1. List of chondracanthid copepods from India, with their fish hosts and distribution records.
Chondracanthid copepodsHost fish [Family]Localities in IndiaReferencesGenusspeciesSynonymsAcanthochondria Oakley, 19301A. krishnai sp. n.Uranoscopus guttatus Cuvier [Uranoscopidae]Muttom (the type locality) and Colachel, off South-west coast, India; Neendakara, Quilon, Kerala coast.Present studyBactrochondria Ho, Kim and Kumar, 20002B. papilla Ho, Kim and Kumar, 2000Cynoglossus dubius (Regan) [Cynoglossidae]KeralaHo et al., 20003B.hoi (Pillai, 1985)Ceratochondria hoi Pillai, 1985Cynoglossus lida (Bleeker) [Cynoglossidae]KeralaPillai, 1985; Ho et al., 2000Chondracanthus Delaroche, 18114C. kabatai sp. n.Zenopsis conchifer Lowe [Zeidae]Neendakara (type locality), Quilon, Southern Coast, IndiaPresent studyHeterochondria Yu, 19355H. petila Ho, Kim and Kumar, 2000Pseudorhombus javanicus (Bleeker), P.triocellatus (Bloch), P.arsius (Hamilton) [Paralichthyidae]KeralaHo et al., 2000Cynoglossus lida (Bleeker) and C.dubius (Regan)6H. pillai Ho, 1970[Cynoglossidae], Pseudorhombus javanicus (Bleeker), P.triocellatus (Bloch), P.elevatus Ogilby, and P.arsius (Hamilton) [Paralichthyidae]KeralaPillai, 1985; Ho et al., 20007H. similis (Yu and Wu, 1932)Crossorhombus azureus (Alcock) [Bothidae]KeralaHo et al., 20008H. zebriae (Ho, Kim I.H. and Kumar, 2000)Acanthochondria zebriae Ho, Kim I.H. and Kumar, 2000 (Transferred to Heterchondria by Tang et al., 2010)Crossorhombus azureus (Alcock) [Bothidae]KeralaHo et al., 2000Medesicaste KrØyer, 18639M. penetrans Heller, 1868Trigla sp., Trigla capensis [= Chelidonichthys capensis (Cuvier)] [Triglidae]KeralaPillai, 1985Protochondracanthus Kirtisinghe, 195010P.alatus (Heller, 1868)Chondracanthus alatus Heller, 1865 Protochondracanthus psettodis Kirtisinghe, 1950Psettodes erumi (Bleeker and Schneider) [Psettodidae]Kerala, Tamil NaduPillai, 1985; Ho et al., 2000; Kizhakudan et al., 201511P.trilobatus (Pillai, 1964)Chondracanthus trilobatus Pillai, 1964Psettodes erumi (Bleeker and Schneider) [Psettodidae]Kerala, Tamil NaduPillai, 1985; Ho et al., 2000; Kizhakudan et al., 2015
description: Published as part of Aneesh, Panakkool Thamban, Helna, Ameri Kottarathil & Kumar, Appukuttannair Biju, 2020, New species of Acanthochondria Oakley, 1930 and Chondracanthus Delaroche, 1811 (Copepoda: Cyclopoida: Chondracanthidae) parasitizing marine fishes from Indian waters, pp. 18 in Nauplius (e 2020014) 28 on page 18, DOI: 10.1590/2358-2936e2020014, http://zenodo.org/record/10904748