cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516350.v1
title: Appendix D. Matlab solver for the multiple-settlement analytical solution.

description: Matlab solver for the multiple-settlement analytical solution.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516347
title: Appendix E. Using the Python scripts in ArcGIS.

description: Using the Python scripts in ArcGIS.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516347.v1
title: Appendix E. Using the Python scripts in ArcGIS.

description: Using the Python scripts in ArcGIS.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516344
title: Appendix F. How sustainability indices work and why we need better methods.

description: How sustainability indices work and why we need better methods.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516344.v1
title: Appendix F. How sustainability indices work and why we need better methods.

description: How sustainability indices work and why we need better methods.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516341
title: Supplement 1. Model implementation with Excel spreadsheet, Matlab, and Python script for ArcGIS.

description: File List analytical_spreadsheet_solver.xls*<br> multisettlement_model_solver.m<br> Hunting_Mapper.zip - contains: - Hunting Mapper.tbx<br> - monkeyscriptSteadyState.py<br> - monkeyscript.py Description analytical_spreadsheet_solver.xls* implements the simplest single settlement model in Microsoft Excel. It is designed to be easy to use on a platform familiar to non-technical users. multisettlement_model_solver.m is commented Matlab Code to produce multisettlement maps, cumulative distribution functions, and calculate the global and local catch per unit effort. Hunting_Mapper.zip is a zip file containing ArcGIS toolbox extension and the required python scriptsWindows executable. The toolbox is called, Hunting Mapper.tbx, and it can call two scripts. One script, monkeyscriptSteadyState.py, implements the multisettlement steady state model, which makes it suitable for large spatial and temporal scales. The other script, monkeyscript.py, implements the numerical multisettlement model with diffusive source-sink dynamics. This model is computationally expensive, and it requires the user to input the annual population data for evey settlement. See Appendix E for further instructions. * <i>Please note</i>: ESA cannot guarantee the accessibility of Excel files into the future due to the proprietary nature of the Excel format.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516338
title: Appendix A. Details on the breeding-bird sampling protocol.

description: Details on the breeding-bird sampling protocol.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516338.v1
title: Appendix A. Details on the breeding-bird sampling protocol.

description: Details on the breeding-bird sampling protocol.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516335
title: Appendix B. Results of the analysis with a reduced data set.

description: Results of the analysis with a reduced data set.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516335.v1
title: Appendix B. Results of the analysis with a reduced data set.

description: Results of the analysis with a reduced data set.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516332
title: Appendix C. The α and β diversities within each region disregarding agricultural intensification.

description: The α and β diversities within each region disregarding agricultural intensification.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516332.v1
title: Appendix C. The α and β diversities within each region disregarding agricultural intensification.

description: The α and β diversities within each region disregarding agricultural intensification.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516329
title: Appendix A. Map of England and Wales, with a table showing reference codes and locations of the eight study sites.

description: Map of England and Wales, with a table showing reference codes and locations of the eight study sites.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516326
title: Appendix B. Percentage of foraging visits across all sites and years by each bee species to each plant species.

description: Percentage of foraging visits across all sites and years by each bee species to each plant species.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516323
title: Appendix C. Mean flower density of visited forage plants per m2 from transects in each year, along with the range of means across sites given in brackets.

description: Mean flower density of visited forage plants per m2 from transects in each year, along with the range of means across sites given in brackets.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516320
title: Appendix D. Relationships between bumble bee worker density, species richness, and selected landscape-context and habitat-quality variables for control and sown patches.

description: Relationships between bumble bee worker density, species richness, and selected landscape-context and habitat-quality variables for control and sown patches.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516314
title: Appendix A. Location of Carex stricta sites used in our tussock survey.

description: Location of Carex stricta sites used in our tussock survey.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516314.v1
title: Appendix A. Location of Carex stricta sites used in our tussock survey.

description: Location of Carex stricta sites used in our tussock survey.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516308
title: Appendix B. Redox potential results from mesocosm experiment with errors and multiple comparisons (not displayed in Fig. 3).

description: Redox potential results from mesocosm experiment with errors and multiple comparisons (not displayed in Fig. 3).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516308.v1
title: Appendix B. Redox potential results from mesocosm experiment with errors and multiple comparisons (not displayed in Fig. 3).

description: Redox potential results from mesocosm experiment with errors and multiple comparisons (not displayed in Fig. 3).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516305
title: Appendix C. Horizontal spread and biomass response to hydroperiod treatments in year 1 of the mesocosm experiment.

description: Horizontal spread and biomass response to hydroperiod treatments in year 1 of the mesocosm experiment.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516305.v1
title: Appendix C. Horizontal spread and biomass response to hydroperiod treatments in year 1 of the mesocosm experiment.

description: Horizontal spread and biomass response to hydroperiod treatments in year 1 of the mesocosm experiment.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516302
title: Appendix D. Productivity data summarized by nutrient and hydroperiod treatment with error and multiple comparisons in years 2 and 3 of the mesocosm experiment.

description: Productivity data summarized by nutrient and hydroperiod treatment with error and multiple comparisons in years 2 and 3 of the mesocosm experiment.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516302.v1
title: Appendix D. Productivity data summarized by nutrient and hydroperiod treatment with error and multiple comparisons in years 2 and 3 of the mesocosm experiment.

description: Productivity data summarized by nutrient and hydroperiod treatment with error and multiple comparisons in years 2 and 3 of the mesocosm experiment.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516299
title: Appendix A. Images showing sampling sites and design.

description: Images showing sampling sites and design.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516299.v1
title: Appendix A. Images showing sampling sites and design.

description: Images showing sampling sites and design.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516296
title: Appendix A. Collinearity and cross-validation analyses.

description: Collinearity and cross-validation analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516296.v1
title: Appendix A. Collinearity and cross-validation analyses.

description: Collinearity and cross-validation analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516293
title: Appendix A. Taxonomic classification and ecological attributes of threshold indicator taxa.

description: Taxonomic classification and ecological attributes of threshold indicator taxa.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516293.v1
title: Appendix A. Taxonomic classification and ecological attributes of threshold indicator taxa.

description: Taxonomic classification and ecological attributes of threshold indicator taxa.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516290
title: Appendix B. Impervious cover change points and indicator scores for significant threshold indicator taxa among catchment classes.

description: Impervious cover change points and indicator scores for significant threshold indicator taxa among catchment classes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516290.v1
title: Appendix B. Impervious cover change points and indicator scores for significant threshold indicator taxa among catchment classes.

description: Impervious cover change points and indicator scores for significant threshold indicator taxa among catchment classes.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516287
title: Appendix C. Scatterplots of abundance in response to impervious cover (%) for every negative (z-) threshold indicator taxon among the six physiographic classes of catchments.

description: Scatterplots of abundance in response to impervious cover (%) for every negative (z-) threshold indicator taxon among the six physiographic classes of catchments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516287.v1
title: Appendix C. Scatterplots of abundance in response to impervious cover (%) for every negative (z-) threshold indicator taxon among the six physiographic classes of catchments.

description: Scatterplots of abundance in response to impervious cover (%) for every negative (z-) threshold indicator taxon among the six physiographic classes of catchments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516281
title: Appendix D. Scatterplots of abundance in response to impervious cover (%) for every positive (z+) threshold indicator taxon among the six physiographic classes of catchments.

description: Scatterplots of abundance in response to impervious cover (%) for every positive (z+) threshold indicator taxon among the six physiographic classes of catchments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516281.v1
title: Appendix D. Scatterplots of abundance in response to impervious cover (%) for every positive (z+) threshold indicator taxon among the six physiographic classes of catchments.

description: Scatterplots of abundance in response to impervious cover (%) for every positive (z+) threshold indicator taxon among the six physiographic classes of catchments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516278
title: Appendix E. Threshold indicator taxa analysis (TITAN) of macroinvertebrate community response to percent impervious cover between high-gradient, small (HS) and low-gradient, large (LL) catchments in the Coastal Plain (CP), Piedmont (PD), and Mountains (MT).

description: Threshold indicator taxa analysis (TITAN) of macroinvertebrate community response to percent impervious cover between high-gradient, small (HS) and low-gradient, large (LL) catchments in the Coastal Plain (CP), Piedmont (PD), and Mountains (MT).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516278.v1
title: Appendix E. Threshold indicator taxa analysis (TITAN) of macroinvertebrate community response to percent impervious cover between high-gradient, small (HS) and low-gradient, large (LL) catchments in the Coastal Plain (CP), Piedmont (PD), and Mountains (MT).

description: Threshold indicator taxa analysis (TITAN) of macroinvertebrate community response to percent impervious cover between high-gradient, small (HS) and low-gradient, large (LL) catchments in the Coastal Plain (CP), Piedmont (PD), and Mountains (MT).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516275
title: Appendix A. Monthly median historical (1949) and modern (2006) stream discharge, as well as median monthly discharge and range (maximum and minimum discharge) spanning 1929–2007 for the Wenatchee River below Leavenworth, Washington, USA.

description: Monthly median historical (1949) and modern (2006) stream discharge, as well as median monthly discharge and range (maximum and minimum discharge) spanning 1929–2007 for the Wenatchee River below Leavenworth, Washington, USA.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516275.v1
title: Appendix A. Monthly median historical (1949) and modern (2006) stream discharge, as well as median monthly discharge and range (maximum and minimum discharge) spanning 1929–2007 for the Wenatchee River below Leavenworth, Washington, USA.

description: Monthly median historical (1949) and modern (2006) stream discharge, as well as median monthly discharge and range (maximum and minimum discharge) spanning 1929–2007 for the Wenatchee River below Leavenworth, Washington, USA.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516269
title: Appendix B. A comparison of coarse- and fine-scale landscape views using aerial photography.

description: A comparison of coarse- and fine-scale landscape views using aerial photography.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516269.v1
title: Appendix B. A comparison of coarse- and fine-scale landscape views using aerial photography.

description: A comparison of coarse- and fine-scale landscape views using aerial photography.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516260
title: Appendix C. A description of classification schemes mapped in this research and identifying characteristics and scales used in digitization.

description: A description of classification schemes mapped in this research and identifying characteristics and scales used in digitization.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516260.v1
title: Appendix C. A description of classification schemes mapped in this research and identifying characteristics and scales used in digitization.

description: A description of classification schemes mapped in this research and identifying characteristics and scales used in digitization.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516251
title: Appendix D. A comparison of characteristics between transitioning reaches (identified in Table 4) and the reaches which did not transition to a different reach type from 1949 to 2006.

description: A comparison of characteristics between transitioning reaches (identified in Table 4) and the reaches which did not transition to a different reach type from 1949 to 2006.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516251.v1
title: Appendix D. A comparison of characteristics between transitioning reaches (identified in Table 4) and the reaches which did not transition to a different reach type from 1949 to 2006.

description: A comparison of characteristics between transitioning reaches (identified in Table 4) and the reaches which did not transition to a different reach type from 1949 to 2006.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516248
title: Appendix A. Land cover maps of Ejido X-Maben from 1976, 1988, and 1997.

description: Land cover maps of Ejido X-Maben from 1976, 1988, and 1997.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516248.v1
title: Appendix A. Land cover maps of Ejido X-Maben from 1976, 1988, and 1997.

description: Land cover maps of Ejido X-Maben from 1976, 1988, and 1997.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516245
title: Appendix B. Schematic representation of image processing steps and land cover classes used in Analyses 1–3.

description: Schematic representation of image processing steps and land cover classes used in Analyses 1–3.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516245.v1
title: Appendix B. Schematic representation of image processing steps and land cover classes used in Analyses 1–3.

description: Schematic representation of image processing steps and land cover classes used in Analyses 1–3.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516242
title: Appendix C. Procedure used to estimate group differences in ANCOVAs with significant interaction terms.

description: Procedure used to estimate group differences in ANCOVAs with significant interaction terms.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516242.v1
title: Appendix C. Procedure used to estimate group differences in ANCOVAs with significant interaction terms.

description: Procedure used to estimate group differences in ANCOVAs with significant interaction terms.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516239
title: Appendix D. Bar graphs of land cover composition vs. accessibility for three time periods.

description: Bar graphs of land cover composition vs. accessibility for three time periods.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516239.v1
title: Appendix D. Bar graphs of land cover composition vs. accessibility for three time periods.

description: Bar graphs of land cover composition vs. accessibility for three time periods.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516236
title: Appendix A. A table comparing regression coefficients for allometric relationships between tree biomass components in different databases, a figure showing regressions for scaling of component mass with total tree mass, and a figure showing turnover times for components of biomass from the Luyssaert database.

description: A table comparing regression coefficients for allometric relationships between tree biomass components in different databases, a figure showing regressions for scaling of component mass with total tree mass, and a figure showing turnover times for components of biomass from the Luyssaert database.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516236.v1
title: Appendix A. A table comparing regression coefficients for allometric relationships between tree biomass components in different databases, a figure showing regressions for scaling of component mass with total tree mass, and a figure showing turnover times for components of biomass from the Luyssaert database.

description: A table comparing regression coefficients for allometric relationships between tree biomass components in different databases, a figure showing regressions for scaling of component mass with total tree mass, and a figure showing turnover times for components of biomass from the Luyssaert database.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516233
title: Appendix A. Schedule for a one-semester course at Colorado State University (NR 575: Systems Ecology) introducing concepts of model–data assimilation to graduate students in ecology.

description: Schedule for a one-semester course at Colorado State University (NR 575: Systems Ecology) introducing concepts of model–data assimilation to graduate students in ecology.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516233.v1
title: Appendix A. Schedule for a one-semester course at Colorado State University (NR 575: Systems Ecology) introducing concepts of model–data assimilation to graduate students in ecology.

description: Schedule for a one-semester course at Colorado State University (NR 575: Systems Ecology) introducing concepts of model–data assimilation to graduate students in ecology.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516230
title: Appendix A. Meteorological calculations and data sets.

description: Meteorological calculations and data sets.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516230.v1
title: Appendix A. Meteorological calculations and data sets.

description: Meteorological calculations and data sets.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516227
title: Appendix A. The evaluation of parameter prior ranges.

description: The evaluation of parameter prior ranges.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516227.v1
title: Appendix A. The evaluation of parameter prior ranges.

description: The evaluation of parameter prior ranges.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516224
title: Appendix B. Mapping vectors.

description: Mapping vectors.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516224.v1
title: Appendix B. Mapping vectors.

description: Mapping vectors.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516221
title: Appendix C. Parameter sensitivities.

description: Parameter sensitivities.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516221.v1
title: Appendix C. Parameter sensitivities.

description: Parameter sensitivities.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516218
title: Appendix D. Comparison between observations and simulations by accepted parameters.

description: Comparison between observations and simulations by accepted parameters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516218.v1
title: Appendix D. Comparison between observations and simulations by accepted parameters.

description: Comparison between observations and simulations by accepted parameters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516215
title: Appendix A. Gap filling the meteorological data.

description: Gap filling the meteorological data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516212
title: Appendix B. The inversion scheme.

description: The inversion scheme.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516215.v1
title: Appendix A. Gap filling the meteorological data.

description: Gap filling the meteorological data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516212.v1
title: Appendix B. The inversion scheme.

description: The inversion scheme.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516209
title: Appendix A. Creation of the primary data.

description: Creation of the primary data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516209.v1
title: Appendix A. Creation of the primary data.

description: Creation of the primary data.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516206
title: Supplement 1. R code used to create the results that are presented in Table 2.

description: File List allocate.r Description The allocate.r file is an R script that requires the free, open-source R statistical environment to run. The script is self-contained and can be run using the source command. It provides a function that determines the necessary sampling rate and sample size according to the algorithms in the paper, and examples of using the function to determine the results that we used to construct Table 2.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516206.v1
title: Supplement 1. R code used to create the results that are presented in Table 2.

description: File List allocate.r Description The allocate.r file is an R script that requires the free, open-source R statistical environment to run. The script is self-contained and can be run using the source command. It provides a function that determines the necessary sampling rate and sample size according to the algorithms in the paper, and examples of using the function to determine the results that we used to construct Table 2.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516203
title: Appendix A. Equations for population and fishery dynamics.

description: Equations for population and fishery dynamics.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516203.v1
title: Appendix A. Equations for population and fishery dynamics.

description: Equations for population and fishery dynamics.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516200
title: Appendix B. Non-catastrophic mortality, inter-simulation CV of catch and CPUE in year 100.

description: Non-catastrophic mortality, inter-simulation CV of catch and CPUE in year 100.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516200.v1
title: Appendix B. Non-catastrophic mortality, inter-simulation CV of catch and CPUE in year 100.

description: Non-catastrophic mortality, inter-simulation CV of catch and CPUE in year 100.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516197
title: Appendix A. The local-scale ecological model.

description: The local-scale ecological model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516197.v1
title: Appendix A. The local-scale ecological model.

description: The local-scale ecological model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516194
title: Appendix B. Recruitment parameters.

description: Recruitment parameters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516194.v1
title: Appendix B. Recruitment parameters.

description: Recruitment parameters.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516191
title: Appendix C. Summary of results from sensitivity analysis for CORSET.

description: Summary of results from sensitivity analysis for CORSET.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516191.v1
title: Appendix C. Summary of results from sensitivity analysis for CORSET.

description: Summary of results from sensitivity analysis for CORSET.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516188
title: Appendix A. Information-theoretic criteria for all a priori models.

description: Information-theoretic criteria for all a priori models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516188.v1
title: Appendix A. Information-theoretic criteria for all a priori models.

description: Information-theoretic criteria for all a priori models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516185
title: Appendix A. Sampling design, otolith preparation, and analysis for the French lagoons data set.

description: Sampling design, otolith preparation, and analysis for the French lagoons data set.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516185.v1
title: Appendix A. Sampling design, otolith preparation, and analysis for the French lagoons data set.

description: Sampling design, otolith preparation, and analysis for the French lagoons data set.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3516182
title: Appendix B. True Skill Statistics for each optimal subset of elements.

description: True Skill Statistics for each optimal subset of elements.