DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15135164
title: Table 3 in Proposal of new genera and species of the subfamily Diosaccinae (Copepoda: Harpacticoida: Miraciidae)

description: Table 3 (continued on next page). List of characters used for the phylogenetic analysis.
CharacterDescription1Mxp: miraciid type, prehensile, but not heavily transformed into a grasping limb (0); transformed into agrasping limb (1)2Male A1: haplocer, 11-segmented (0); haplocer, 10-segmented (1); haplocer, nine-segmented (2); haplocer,eight-segmented (3)3A2 EXP 3, number of setae: 3 distal setae (0); one distal seta, one spine and a longer spiniform seta (1)4Male P1, dimorphic ornamentation of basis: without dimorphic ornamentation (0); with chitinousornamentation proximal to inner spine (1)5P1 ENP: issuing from an attenuated roundish process of basis (0); issuing from a long inner process,reaching middle of EXP 1 and from which issues the ENP (1)6P1 EXP 2, inner seta: present (0); absent (1)7P1 exopodal segments, relative length: subequal (0); P1 EXP 2 longer than remaining exopodal segmentsor as long as EXP 1 and EXP 3 combined (1); P1 EXP 2 much longer than EXP 1 and EXP 3 combined (2)8P1 EXP 3, outer armature: with three outer spines and two distal setae, distal outer element may betransformed into a spiniform seta (0); with two outer spines and two distal setae (1); with two outer spines,one distal spiniform seta, and one inner thin seta (2); only with distal elements (3)9P1 EXP 3, shape of proximal element: spiniform (0); transformed into a small seta (1)10P1 ENP, number of segments: three-segmented (0); two-segmented, with proximal seta of ENP 2 indicatingplace of original division between second and third original segments (1); two segmented without proximalseta (2)11P1 ENP 3, relative length: as long as ENP 2 or ENP 2 absent (0); elongate, at least 1.5 times as long asENP 2 (1)12P1 ENP 1, relative length: shorter or slightly longer than EXP (0); ENP 1 reaching far beyond EXP 3 (1)13P1 distal endopodal segment, setae: with inner seta, distal (geniculate) seta and outer spiniform seta (0);with inner seta (maybe lost or not illustrated in some descriptions), distal long spine and distal shorterouter spine (1)14P2 EXP 1, inner seta: present (0); absent (1)15P3 EXP 1, inner seta: present (0); absent (1)16P4 EXP 1, inner seta: present (0); absent (1)17P2 EXP 2, inner seta: present (0); absent (1)18P3 EXP 2, inner seta: present (0); absent (1)19P4 EXP 2, inner seta: present (0); absent (1)20P2 ENP 1, inner seta: present (0); absent (1)21P2 ENP 2, number of inner setae: two (0); one (1)22P3 ENP 2, number of inner setae: two (0); one (1)23P2 EXP 3, inner seta(e): present (0); absent (1)24P2 EXP 3, short distal seta inserted on inner margin: absent (0); present (1)25P3 EXP 3, inner seta(e): present (0); absent (1)26P3 EXP 3, short distal seta inserted on inner margin: absent (0); present (1)27P4 EXP 3, inner seta(e): present (0); absent (1)28P4 EXP 3, short distal seta inserted on inner margin: absent (0); present (1)29Male P2 ENP 1, spinular ornamentation: bare or weakly spinulose (0); with a patch of spinules on the distalouter margin (1)30Male P2 ENP 2, spinular ornamentation: bare or weakly spinulose (0); heavily spinulose (1)31Male P3 EXP 3, anterior dimorphic tube pore: absent (0); present (1)
description: Published as part of Gómez, Samuel, Corgosinho, Paulo Henrique Costa & Rivera-Sánchez, Karen I., 2021, Proposal of new genera and species of the subfamily Diosaccinae (Copepoda: Harpacticoida: Miraciidae), pp. 7 in European Journal of Taxonomy 759 (1) on page 7, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2021.759.1433, http://zenodo.org/record/5101691