DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17020671
title: LCA data of scenarios derived from 'CO2InnO-H2-CHP-Demonstrator' Open Modelica TEA model

description: This repository contains LCI and LCIA datasets used in a LCA (Life-Cycle Assessment) study, derived from the outputs of a TEA (Techno-Economic Assessment) OpenModelica model used for the study of decentralized energy systems (DES) based on hydrogen use (H₂) and using H₂ in an internal combustion engine for combined heat & power (ICE-CHP).

The original TEA OpenModelica model is hosted on Github under the name "CO2InnO-H2-CHP-Demonstrator". The dataset of the "CO2InnO-H2-CHP-Demonstrator" outputs for the scenarios considered and the dedicated processing notebooks are hosted in a companion Zenodo repository.

The LCI datasets come with a synthetic documentation explaning the determination of each flow of the Life-Cycle Inventory (LCI) for the different scenarios studied. The full and ready-to-use Brightway2 project can be transmitted on demand, provided you have a valid ecoinvent v3.10 license. The LCIA datasets are provided with the Jupyter Notebook used to process them in order to create relevant visualizations of the Life-Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) for the LCA study.

The related scientific article link will be added once it is accepted.

Context

The global aim was to conduct a TEA-grounded LCA of a H₂-ICE-CHP based DES to fill a gap in the contemporary literature, and contribute to the development of open-source approaches for combined TEA-LCA. It is built on a case study of the Offenburg municipality (Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), which provided real data regarding several buildings energy requirements, with hourly resolution over a year. This municipality is a partner of the CO2InnO project, representative of small to medium cities wishing to decarbonize their electricity and mostly their heat demand, but which will not be connected to the future hydrogen backbone before 2035 at least.

Objective & Methodology

The simulated energy system developed in OpenModelica (Fritzson et al., 2020) using a TEA framework (Beerlage et al., 2024) was used to generate several quantitative scenarios with hourly resolution of flows over a year. Based on the results outlined, a comparative cradle-to-grave LCA (compliant with ISO 14040/44) was conducted to evaluate the environmental impacts of the DES configurations identified in the TEA study. Mass and energy balances for each scenario were reconstructed from OpenModelica outputs using custom Python procedures within Jupyter Notebooks – see companion Zenodo repository. The LCA was implemented using the Brightway2 open-source framework (Mutel, 2018) via the Activity Browser GUI (Steubing et al., 2020). The background system was modeled using the ecoinvent v3.10 database with the “allocation, cut-off by classification” approach. Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) was initially performed using the EU-recommended EF v3.1 method, which includes 16 environmental indicators (Andreasi Bassi et al., 2023). For clarity and relevance, five key indicators were selected for detailed analysis – Table below – but this repository contains the data for every indicator. Uncertainty analysis was conducted through Monte Carlo simulations, followed by global sensitivity analysis (GSA) to identify key contributors to result variability.






Environmental category



Impact indicator





Climate change



Global Warming Potential (GWP100)





Ecotoxicity (freshwater)



USEtox / Ecotoxicity: freshwater (ECOTOX-FW)





Human toxicity (carcinogenic)



USEtox / Human toxicity: carcinogenic (HT-C)





Resource consumption



Abiotic Depletion Potential: ultimate reserves (ADP-UR)





Water use



User Deprivation Potential (UDP-WU)





Functional unit

The functional unit, defined as the "quantified performance of a product system used as a reference unit in life cycle assessment," is set as "one year of operation of the H₂ ICE-CHP-based DES, calibrated to meet heat demand." This definition reflects that the system’s decentralized character is primarily related to heat supply, while electricity exchange with the grid remains readily achievable. The annual heat and electricity demand respectively amounted to 1,410 MJ and 297.3 MWh.

System model boundaries

The investigated system is centered arround the ICE-CHP in a context of heat-lead functionning where electricity exchanges with the grid are possible. It comprises three interconnected subsystems: electrical, thermal, and hydrogen.

Given the system’s ability to exchange electricity with the grid, multiple system boundaries can be defined for impact assessment, each yielding distinct results and interpretations. To ensure a comprehensive evaluation, three boundary scenarios were considered. In the ‘Load’ (L) boundary, only the flows directly meeting the heat and electricity demands of the Offenburg buildings are included. The ‘Load + Excess’ (LE) boundary also accounts for the environmental burden of the electricity overproduction which is not consumed by the buildings. Lastly, the ‘Load + Excess - Grid(DE)’ (LEG) boundary consequently assumes that the excess electricity is exported to the GRID for other uses. It replaces an equivalent amount of electricity from the German electricity mix, thereby potentially crediting the system with avoided emissions.

Scenario dimensioning

See companion Zenodo repository for description of the scenarios.

Data origin and uncertainties

See companion Zenodo repository for description of the TEA-related data origin and uncertainties.

Regarding LCA specifically, uncertainty analysis incorporated the existing uncertainty data from the ecoinvent v3.10 database for the background system. As most ecoinvent processes required scaling to align with the TEA-modeled system components, additional uncertainties were introduced using triangular distributions and pedigree matrix-based methods for modified flows. Monte Carlo simulations were performed with 1,000 iterations for each scenario. It is important to note that the Activity Browser does not include uncertainty data for characterization factors (CFs); thus, uncertainty propagation in the results reflects only the background and adapted foreground systems.

Structure & How to use

The LCI zip file contains:



The LCI-report docx file documenting the building of the Life-Cycle Inventory.

The different xlsx files provides the LCI of all the subsystems and full scenarios.


However, the direct reuse of these xlsx files in Brightway2 / Activity-Browser is difficult due to the structure adopted: each subsystem is a dedicated database, and the interdependancy of the databases currently prevents their streamlined importation. This approach was originally adopted because of the use of the ecoinvent database, which is not open source. LCA practitionners with a valid ecoinvent v3.10 license should contact us for sharing of the full and ready-to-use Brightway2 project.

The LCIA zip file contains:



The various results folders for MonteCarlo simulation (MC), Contribution analysis (CA folder), Global Sensitivity Analysis (GSA).

The lcia_results Jupyter Notebook using Python code to process these files and interactively generate relevant visualizations. This notebook has in-depth internal documentation to help new users.

The pickles folder with pkl files for the different subdatasets used in the whole pipeline. It allows users to only execute some part of the notebook according to their need.


Requirements

Python environment manager

We suggest you to use Miniconda:



Miniconda is a free, miniature installation of Anaconda Distribution that includes only conda, Python, the packages they both depend on, and a small number of other useful packages.


 Miniconda Installation Guide

Setting up the environment

Note: the notebooks were tested on Python 3.11. 

Within your Python environment manager console (like miniconda console, or anything that suits you):

Create a new Conda environment with all required libraries (in this example named `da` for "data analysis"):

conda create  -n da -c conda-forge os pandas numpy tdqm matplotlib seaborn jupyterlab

(Add any required library)

Or, create the Conda environment only:

conda create -n da -c conda-forge

And install the libraries afterwards, after activating the environment:

conda activate da

conda install os pandas numpy tdqm matplotlib seaborn jupyterlab

(Add any required library)

Some libraries may require you to use  the `pip` manager instead of conda. In that case, use the command:

pip install name_of_library

Use the Jupyter Notebooks

1.  Activate the environment:

conda activate da

2. Launch Jupyter Lab:

jupyter-lab

You can select the Notebook you want to use by navigating in the directory where you downloaded the Notebook.

It is thoroughly documented to allow you to understand what does each bloc of code.