cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564737
title: individual data

description: The above data includes agreed patients' individual preprocessed fMRI images. NC:control group(15); Stroke:stroke group(13). <strong>Image Acquisition</strong> All participants were scanned using a 3.0T MR scanner (Philips Achieva Magnetom Avanto, Amsterdam Netherlands) . T2* weighted R-fMRI data were acquired using an echo-planar imaging pulse sequence: 33 axial slices; repetition time (TR) = 2000 ms; echo time (TE) = 30 ms; slice thickness = 3.5 mm; gap = 0.7 mm; flip angle (FA) = 90°; matrix = 64×64; field of view (FOV) = 200 × 200 mm2. During data acquisition, participants were asked to lie quietly in the scanner with their eyes closed. A total of 240 volumes were obtained for each participant. <strong>Data Processing</strong> R-fMRI data preprocessing was performed with the GRETNA toolbox(http://www.nitrc.org/projects/gretna/) based on the SPM8 (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm8/). After removal of the first 5 volumes, the functional images were first corrected for time offsets between slices and geometrical displacements due to head movement. The corrected functional data were then normalized to the Montreal Neurological Institute space using an optimum 12-parameter affine transformation and non-linear deformations and then resampled to a 3-mm isotropic resolution. The resulting images were further underwent spatial smoothing (Gaussian kernel with a full width at half maximum = 6 mm), linear detrend ensured the comparability of our results and those of the existing literature.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564738.v1
title: Myth vs. reality: Altmetrics & librarians

description: This dataset includes survey response data exported from Qualtrics. It is a subset of the full survey response data collected that covers many different areas of library services. It's uploaded here for sharing as part of the Altmetrics15 workshop in Amsterdam (October 2015). Librarians have historically been early adopters of research metrics, which are commonly understood as being used in the context of their day-to-day jobs, particularly for collection management activities. While much has been written about librarians’ role in the formation and use of the journal impact factor and article and journal usage statistics, there have until now been no major studies of how librarians use altmetrics. In this talk, the authors will share the results from a survey of librarians in the United States who work in research intensive institutions. Respondents self-report that they are increasingly passing over the journal impact factor in favor of using altmetrics, citation counts, and usage statistics for collection development decisions and other job-related duties (including information literacy instruction, reference services, and scholarly communication consulting). Librarians are also increasingly using altmetrics in their own capacities as researchers, to help determine how to best communicate their research impacts to others when going up for tenure and in other professional advancement contexts. The authors expect that this survey will serve as a useful benchmark for the uptake of altmetrics and other research impact measures among librarians, the extent of which may change in the future. We will also discuss the possible implications of these responses on the services provided by altmetrics aggregators like Altmetric, who often count librarians among their subscribers.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564740.v2
title: Pan Trap Dataset

description: The experiment was conducted on September 29, 2015 in the Danby Woodlots and Danby Grasslands on the York University Keele Campus between 2:50pm-4:30pm in collaboration with Naduni, Bryson and Stanley. The experiment was conducted on a rainy, gloomy day with an overcast and an external temperature of 17°C. The purpose of this experiment is to get field training using sampling techniques, such as pan traps, in order to estimate animal abundances. The study was conducted by organizing the solo bowls into groups of three with 1 white, 1 yellow and 1 blue bowl in each group. I then filled each bowl with enough soapy water such that the base of the bowl was filled with a thin layer of soapy water so that if any insects did fall into the pan trap, they would be unable to escape from the pan trap. I then placed 3 groups of bowls randomly throughout the Danby Woodlot, as well as another 3 groups of bowls randomly in the Danby Grassland. Within each group, I placed the three bowls in a triangular position with the bowls spread apart 30 centimeters equally from each other. I finished placing the bowls by around 3:10pm, I then waited one hour to allow the pan traps to trap insects. While waiting for an hour, I assisted my collaborators with their respective experiments. After waiting for an hour, I first went to the Woodlot and observed the results of my pan traps. I closely observed the contents of each bowl within the 3 groups scattered across the Danby Woodlot and counted the number of total insects caught within each bowl, the number of RTU’s caught within each bowl and classified the unique RTU’s. I was only able to count the captured insects if they were large enough to be seen with the naked eye. After collecting my data, I poured the soapy water out of each bowl and collected all the bowls. I then proceeded to the Danby Grasslands to repeat the same process of data tabulation. The average number of insects caught among all the pan traps was 1.6. The average number of insects caught among the blue pan traps was 1.0. The average number of insects caught among the white pan traps is 1.2. The average number of insects caught among the yellow pan traps was 2.5. The most common RTU caught was flies and the least common RTU caught was ants.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564752.v1
title: Sperm Proteome Maturation in the Mouse Epididymis

description: Samples consisted of intact epididymides that were harvested from five euthanized adult male mice (Mus musculus). Each epididymis was then defatted, separated from the testis and vas deferens and cut into three segments, corresponding to the caput, corpus, and cauda epididymis, based on morphological analysis. The sperm from each tissue segment were then purified using repeated rounds of centrifugation and pellet resuspension, solubilized in SDS, and ran on a 1-dimensional SDS-PAGE for in-gel digestion. Extracted peptides were analyzed by nanoflow reverse phase liquid chromatography using a nanoAcquity LC system (Waters) coupled in-line with the linear trap quadrupole (LTQ) Orbitrap Velos instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Mass spectrometry data were collected with the instrument operating in data dependent MS/MS mode and analysed using X!Tandem (The GPM; version 2009.10.01.1) searched against the NCBI Mus musculus protein fasta file (dated 3/4/2011, with 29617 entries). X!Tandem was searched with a fragment ion mass tolerance of 0.50Da and a parent ion tolerance of 2.0Da. Iodoacetamide derivative of cysteine was specified as a fixed modification, while oxidation of methionine was specified as a variable modification.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564739.v1
title: WEEK 4: Dataset 1 - Using a quadrat to determine RTUs

description: Description The experiment was conducted on Monday September 28nd at approximately 3:45 pm until 5:00. All the data was collected in the woodlot and corresponds to dataset 1. It was cloudly, windy and humid. The temperature was around 20 degrees celcius. Materials: Quadrat, 1m by 1m Method: 20 quadrats were used in total, 10 to be placed in the grassland and 10 to be placed in the woodlot. The selection of each quadrat in the habitat was randomized by first selecting a location and then the next one would be located 1.5 meters north to the previous location where the quadrat was placed. The quadrat was left in place for a duration of 2 minutes. After the desired time elapsed 2 minutes were spent counting the insects within the quadrat. The recognizable RTUs include dragonflies, mayflies, grasshoppers,bugs,butterflies,moths beetles, flies, ants, wasps, bees and spider.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564740.v1
title: Pan Trap Dataset

description: The experiment was conducted on September 29, 2015 in the Danby Woodlots and Danby Grasslands on the York University Keele Campus between 2:50pm-4:30pm in collaboration with Naduni, Bryson and Stanley. The experiment was conducted on a rainy, gloomy day with an overcast and an external temperature of 17°C. The purpose of this experiment is to get field training using sampling techniques, such as pan traps, in order to estimate animal abundances. The study was conducted by organizing the solo bowls into groups of three with 1 white, 1 yellow and 1 blue bowl in each group. I then filled each bowl with enough soapy water such that the base of the bowl was filled with a thin layer of soapy water so that if any insects did fall into the pan trap, they would be unable to escape from the pan trap. I then placed 3 groups of bowls randomly throughout the Danby Woodlot, as well as another 3 groups of bowls randomly in the Danby Grassland. Within each group, I placed the three bowls in a triangular position with the bowls spread apart 30 centimeters equally from each other. I finished placing the bowls by around 3:10pm, I then waited one hour to allow the pan traps to trap insects. While waiting for an hour, I assisted my collaborators with their respective experiments. After waiting for an hour, I first went to the Woodlot and observed the results of my pan traps. I closely observed the contents of each bowl within the 3 groups scattered across the Danby Woodlot and counted the number of total insects caught within each bowl, the number of RTU’s caught within each bowl and classified the unique the RTU’s. I was only able to count the captured insects if they were large enough to be seen with the naked eye. After collecting my data, I poured the soapy water out of each bowl and collected all the bowls. I then proceeded to the Danby Grasslands to repeat the same process of data tabulation. The average number of insects caught among all the pan traps was 1.6. The average number of insects caught among the blue pan traps was 1.0. The average number of insects caught among the white pan traps is 1.2. The average number of insects caught among the yellow pan traps was 2.5. The most common RTU caught was flies and the least common RTU caught was ants.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564733
title: Birds seen along transect in woodlot and grassland areas

description: On Monday September 28th 2015, at York University, our team did 10 transects, each being 50 large paces long, to observe the birds density and variety. Five of the transect walks took place in the Saywell Woodlot and the other five took place in the Stong Pond Grassland. For each 10 paces walked we would stop for one minute to observe in depth if there were any birds in the surrounding area, because often they blended in with their surroundings. Therefore, each transect walk took approximately 5 minute to accomplish. The areas were observed with the naked eye as well as with the help of binoculars to aid with birds at a greater distance that were difficult to identify.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564736
title: Gh5_Lutjanus purpureus

description: Fasta file for Growth Hormone-intron 5 Lutjanus purpureus (coast of state of Pará-Brasil) Reference: da Silva, R; Silva, D; Veneza, I; Sampaio, I; Schneider, H and Gomes, G (submitted) Development of Intragenic Markers and Their Applicability in Population Analyses of Lutjanidae (Perciformes). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564735
title: LWSCO_Development of Intragenic Markers for Lutjanidae

description: Fasta file for long wavelength sensitive cone (LWSCO) Lutjanus purpureus (coast of state of Pará-Brasil) Reference: da Silva, R; Silva, D; Veneza, I; Sampaio, I; Schneider, H and Gomes, G (submitted) Development of Intragenic Markers and Their Applicability in Population Analyses of Lutjanidae (Perciformes). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564733.v1
title: Birds seen along transect in woodlot and grassland areas

description: On Monday September 28th 2015, at York University, our team did 10 transects, each being 50 large paces long, to observe the birds density and variety. Five of the transect walks took place in the Saywell Woodlot and the other five took place in the Stong Pond Grassland. For each 10 paces walked we would stop for one minute to observe in depth if there were any birds in the surrounding area, because often they blended in with their surroundings. Therefore, each transect walk took approximately 5 minute to accomplish. The areas were observed with the naked eye as well as with the help of binoculars to aid with birds at a greater distance that were difficult to identify.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564735.v1
title: LWSCO_Development of Intragenic Markers for Lutjanidae

description: Fasta file for long wavelength sensitive cone (LWSCO) Lutjanus purpureus (coast of state of Pará-Brasil) Reference: da Silva, R; Silva, D; Veneza, I; Sampaio, I; Schneider, H and Gomes, G (submitted) Development of Intragenic Markers and Their Applicability in Population Analyses of Lutjanidae (Perciformes). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564736.v2
title: Gh5_Lutjanus purpureus

description: Fasta file for Growth Hormone-intron 5 Lutjanus purpureus (coast of state of Pará-Brasil) Reference: da Silva, R; Silva, D; Veneza, I; Sampaio, I; Schneider, H and Gomes, G (submitted) Development of Intragenic Markers and Their Applicability in Population Analyses of Lutjanidae (Perciformes). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564736.v1
title: Gh5_Development of Intragenic Markers and Their Applicability in Population Analyses of Lutjanidae (Perciformes)

description: Fasta file for Growth Hormone-intron 5 Lutjanus purpureus (coast of state of Pará-Brasil) Reference: da Silva, R; Silva, D; Veneza, I; Sampaio, I; Schneider, H and Gomes, G (submitted) Development of Intragenic Markers and Their Applicability in Population Analyses of Lutjanidae (Perciformes). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564711
title: The Account Books of the Reimarus Family of Hamburg, 1728-1780

description: In <em>The Account Books of the Reimarus Family of Hamburg, 1728-1780</em>, Almut Spalding and Paul S. Spalding offer a two-volume critical edition of domestic records that open windows onto early modern Europe and the Enlightenment. PDF file containing graphs
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564714
title: Arm Chair Perspective Preferences

description: Do generic observers in their free-style viewing of postcard-size pictures have a preference for spe­cific modes of perspective rendering? This most likely depends upon the phrasing of the question. Here we consider the feeling of ‘presence’: does the observer experience a sense of being ‘immersed in the scene’? We had 40 Italian naïve participants and 19 British art students rate three types of rendering of ten ‘typical holiday pictures’. All pictures represented 130° over the width of the picture. They were rendered in linear perspective, Hauck maps, and Postel maps. The results are clearcut. About a quarter of the participants prefer linear perspective, whereas the Hauck map is preferred by more than half of the participants. Naïve observers and art students agree. Architectural scenes are somewhat more likely to be preferred in perspective. Preferences are not randomly distributed, but participants have remarkable idiosyncratic affinities, a small group for perspective projection, a larger group for the Hauck map. Such facts might find application in the viewing of photographs on hand­held electronic display devices.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564715
title: Abundance and Diversity of insects obtained through pan traps in both grassland and woodlot habitats

description: This study was done on September 28th, 2015 at approximately 3:00 pm and the data was collected an hour later at 4:00 pm at approximately 21ᵒC with cloudy skies. The study was conducted at the Saywell woodlot and the grasslands surrounding Stong pond on the Keele campus of York University. Both the woodlot and grassland was wet from the rain a few hours prior to the start and completion of this study. The study started by placing 9 bowls filled with soap water at the grassland by Stong pond. The starting location was picked at random, and it started by placing a white bowl, then yellow bowl and followed by a blue bowl, in this order until all 9 bowls of soap water is placed. The replicates were placed 3 meters apart, done so by using the transect measuring tape. The same process was done at the Saywell woodlot, starting from randomly picking an edge of the woodlot and placed further into the woods, until all 9 bowls were used, once again in white, yellow, blue pattern. As the bowls are placed within each area, an hour is timed through a watch before obtaining the bowls again for the data. The data collected through each bowl is the abundance (number of total insects (6 legs) found), and RTU, the recognized taxonomic units.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564716
title: Thomson Reuters y las altmetrics: usage counts frente a citation counts en la Web of Science

description: Datos empíricos utilizados en el working paper "Thomson Reuters y las altmetrics: usage counts frente a citation counts en la Web of Science". Contiene el listado de documentos extraído de WoS, y los análisis por revistas y categorías realizados.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564715.v1
title: Abundance and Diversity of insects obtained through pan traps in both grassland and woodlot habitats

description: This study was done on September 28th, 2015 at approximately 3:00 pm and the data was collected an hour later at 4:00 pm at approximately 21ᵒC with cloudy skies. The study was conducted at the Saywell woodlot and the grasslands surrounding Stong pond on the Keele campus of York University. Both the woodlot and grassland was wet from the rain a few hours prior to the start and completion of this study. The study started by placing 9 bowls filled with soap water at the grassland by Stong pond. The starting location was picked at random, and it started by placing a white bowl, then yellow bowl and followed by a blue bowl, in this order until all 9 bowls of soap water is placed. The replicates were placed 3 meters apart, done so by using the transect measuring tape. The same process was done at the Saywell woodlot, starting from randomly picking an edge of the woodlot and placed further into the woods, until all 9 bowls were used, once again in white, yellow, blue pattern. As the bowls are placed within each area, an hour is timed through a watch before obtaining the bowls again for the data. The data collected through each bowl is the abundance (number of total insects (6 legs) found), and RTU, the recognized taxonomic units.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564613
title: WK4: Dataset 5-Bird Sighting

description: The data for Laboratory conducted on September 28,2015 was collected from 2:30pm to 5:30 pm at the Danby grassland and woodlot on York University Keele Campus. The temperature was around 18 degrees Celsius with moderate cloud coverage and light winds. The objective of the experiment was to observe the frequency of birds and their species in the designated areas. The experiment was replicated 10 times in total, 5 times in the grassland and 5 times in the woodlot. In order to complete the experiment a 15 foot transect measuring tape was laid randomly throughout the grassland or woodlot. After the transect tape had been laid, the experimenters recorded the total frequency of birds sighted, the species of the birds, an estimate of how far from the transect the bird(s) appeared and the wind speed at the time each bird was sighted. Each trial was conducted for 5 minutes. To obtain the species name, a bird identification key was used. The wind speed was calculated by referring to the Beaufort scale, which aids in judging the speed of wind depending on observed conditions. The table used for this experiment measured wind speed in miles per hour.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564711.v1
title: The Account Books of the Reimarus Family of Hamburg, 1728-1780

description: In <em>The Account Books of the Reimarus Family of Hamburg, 1728-1780</em>, Almut Spalding and Paul S. Spalding offer a two-volume critical edition of domestic records that open windows onto early modern Europe and the Enlightenment. PDF file containing graphs
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564714.v1
title: Arm Chair Perspective Preferences

description: Do generic observers in their free-style viewing of postcard-size pictures have a preference for spe­cific modes of perspective rendering? This most likely depends upon the phrasing of the question. Here we consider the feeling of ‘presence’: does the observer experience a sense of being ‘immersed in the scene’? We had 40 Italian naïve participants and 19 British art students rate three types of rendering of ten ‘typical holiday pictures’. All pictures represented 130° over the width of the picture. They were rendered in linear perspective, Hauck maps, and Postel maps. The results are clearcut. About a quarter of the participants prefer linear perspective, whereas the Hauck map is preferred by more than half of the participants. Naïve observers and art students agree. Architectural scenes are somewhat more likely to be preferred in perspective. Preferences are not randomly distributed, but participants have remarkable idiosyncratic affinities, a small group for perspective projection, a larger group for the Hauck map. Such facts might find application in the viewing of photographs on hand­held electronic display devices.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564613.v1
title: WK4: Dataset 5-Bird Sighting

description: The data for Laboratory conducted on September 28,2015 was collected from 2:30pm to 5:30 pm at the Danby grassland and woodlot on York University Keele Campus. The temperature was around 18 degrees Celsius with moderate cloud coverage and light winds. The objective of the experiment was to observe the frequency of birds and their species in the designated areas. The experiment was replicated 10 times in total, 5 times in the grassland and 5 times in the woodlot. In order to complete the experiment a 15 foot transect measuring tape was laid randomly throughout the grassland or woodlot. After the transect tape had been laid, the experimenters recorded the total frequency of birds sighted, the species of the birds, an estimate of how far from the transect the bird(s) appeared and the wind speed at the time each bird was sighted. Each trial was conducted for 5 minutes. To obtain the species name, a bird identification key was used. The wind speed was calculated by referring to the Beaufort scale, which aids in judging the speed of wind depending on observed conditions. The table used for this experiment measured wind speed in miles per hour.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1564630
title: Data for Bird Sightings at York University

description: Data was recorded for the sighting of any type of bird that was within a 25m range from a 25m line transect laid at York University’s Grassland east of Stong Pond and at the Saywell Woodlot. The study was conducted on September 28, 2015 at nearly 3:00pm. The temperature was 21 degrees Celsius with a cloudy sky. At each of the locations; the Grassland and the Woodlot, 5 transects were randomly laid at least 15m away from each other. For each transect, bird sightings were conducted for 3 minutes. Individual bird species were identified using a bird book, provided by York University. In this experiment, the species of birds seen, frequency, wind speed and distance between bird and transect were all recorded. The wind speed was determined using the Beaufort Scale which ranges from under 1 mile per hour (calm) to 73 miles per hour or higher (hurricane). Overall, the experiment was successful and informational.