cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144671
title: Table 2 in Phestilla subodiosus sp. nov. (Nudibranchia, Trinchesiidae), a corallivorous pest species in the aquarium trade

description: Table 2. Observational data of the feeding preference of Phestilla subodiosus sp. nov. Abbreviations: N indicates that this species of coral did not satisfy the two conditions needed to be counted as a host coral; Y indicates that the species did satisfy both conditions needed to be counted as a host coral.
FamilyGenusSpeciesGrowth formHost speciesAcroporidaeAcroporasamoensisDigitate corymbose. Thick branches.NpruinosaDigitate arborescent. Thin branches.NMontiporasp. 1Encrusting.Ysp. 2Digitate arborescent. Thin branches.Ysp. 3Laminar scrolling.Ysp. 4Laminar scrolling or encrusting.YLobophylliidaeEchinophylliaasperaLaminar scrolling or encrusting.NPoritidaePoritessp. 1Encrusting.N
description: Published as part of Wang, Adam, Conti-Jerpe, Inga Elizabeth, Richards, John Lawrence & Baker, David Michael, 2020, Phestilla subodiosus sp. nov. (Nudibranchia, Trinchesiidae), a corallivorous pest species in the aquarium trade, pp. 1 in ZooKeys 909 on page 1, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.909.35278
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144674
title: Table 3. Uncorrected COI p in Phestilla subodiosus sp. nov. (Nudibranchia, Trinchesiidae), a corallivorous pest species in the aquarium trade

description: Table 3. Uncorrected COI p -distances (%) among all species of described Phestilla with available sequences. Percentages all rounded to one decimal place. Standard error (%) estimates rounded to one decimal place generated from bootstrapping (N = 10,000) are shown above the diagonal.
1234567891011121314151Phestilla minor1.61.41.41.41.41.41.41.61.61.41.41.41.31.42P. sibogae201.51.51.51.51.51.51.70.61.61.61.51.51.53P. sp. 215.218.91.41.41.41.41.41.61.51.31.51.41.41.34P. subodiosus sp. nov. PS114.617.513.70.00.00.00.01.51.41.41.40.41.30.45P. subodiosus sp. nov. PS314.617.513.70.00.00.00.01.51.41.41.40.41.30.46P. subodiosus sp. nov. PS414.617.513.70.00.00.00.01.51.41.41.40.41.30.47P. subodiosus sp. nov. PS514.617.513.70.00.00.00.01.51.41.41.40.41.30.48P. subodiosus sp. nov. PS614.617.513.70.00.00.00.01.51.41.41.40.41.30.49P. chaetopterana comb. nov.17.118.417.114.914.914.914.914.91.61.61.51.51.51.510P. lugubris19.92.218.716.716.716.716.716.717.81.61.51.41.51.411P. melanobrachia14.619.712.615.915.915.915.915.919.319.61.51.41.41.412P. poritophages14.218.516.714.214.214.214.214.215.817.717.61.41.41.413Phestilla sp. L14.116.913.61.01.01.01.01.014.716.115.914.11.30.514Phestilla sp. 112.91814.611.811.811.811.811.815.517.714.915.111.81.315Phestilla sp. 313.717.413.21.21.21.21.21.214.516.915.814.11.511.6
description: Published as part of Wang, Adam, Conti-Jerpe, Inga Elizabeth, Richards, John Lawrence & Baker, David Michael, 2020, Phestilla subodiosus sp. nov. (Nudibranchia, Trinchesiidae), a corallivorous pest species in the aquarium trade, pp. 1 in ZooKeys 909 on page 1, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.909.35278
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144675
title: Table 3. Uncorrected COI p in Phestilla subodiosus sp. nov. (Nudibranchia, Trinchesiidae), a corallivorous pest species in the aquarium trade

description: Table 3. Uncorrected COI p -distances (%) among all species of described Phestilla with available sequences. Percentages all rounded to one decimal place. Standard error (%) estimates rounded to one decimal place generated from bootstrapping (N = 10,000) are shown above the diagonal.
1234567891011121314151Phestilla minor1.61.41.41.41.41.41.41.61.61.41.41.41.31.42P. sibogae201.51.51.51.51.51.51.70.61.61.61.51.51.53P. sp. 215.218.91.41.41.41.41.41.61.51.31.51.41.41.34P. subodiosus sp. nov. PS114.617.513.70.00.00.00.01.51.41.41.40.41.30.45P. subodiosus sp. nov. PS314.617.513.70.00.00.00.01.51.41.41.40.41.30.46P. subodiosus sp. nov. PS414.617.513.70.00.00.00.01.51.41.41.40.41.30.47P. subodiosus sp. nov. PS514.617.513.70.00.00.00.01.51.41.41.40.41.30.48P. subodiosus sp. nov. PS614.617.513.70.00.00.00.01.51.41.41.40.41.30.49P. chaetopterana comb. nov.17.118.417.114.914.914.914.914.91.61.61.51.51.51.510P. lugubris19.92.218.716.716.716.716.716.717.81.61.51.41.51.411P. melanobrachia14.619.712.615.915.915.915.915.919.319.61.51.41.41.412P. poritophages14.218.516.714.214.214.214.214.215.817.717.61.41.41.413Phestilla sp. L14.116.913.61.01.01.01.01.014.716.115.914.11.30.514Phestilla sp. 112.91814.611.811.811.811.811.815.517.714.915.111.81.315Phestilla sp. 313.717.413.21.21.21.21.21.214.516.915.814.11.511.6
description: Published as part of Wang, Adam, Conti-Jerpe, Inga Elizabeth, Richards, John Lawrence & Baker, David Michael, 2020, Phestilla subodiosus sp. nov. (Nudibranchia, Trinchesiidae), a corallivorous pest species in the aquarium trade, pp. 1 in ZooKeys 909 on page 1, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.909.35278
DOI: 10.3886/e225281
title: The effects of virtual reality and augmented reality technologies on students' story retelling performance

description: This study aims to compare the retelling performance of two
groups that engaged in reading activities with virtual reality and augmented
reality texts. Furthermore, the results of the interventions using these
technologies were compared with the results of the printed text reading
activity. The study participants comprised 100 students aged 12 to 13 years
studying in a secondary school. The researchers evaluated the students'
story-retelling performance through a rubric in the study. In the pre-test
stage, the students performed a paper-based reading activity on the texts in
the coursebook and their retelling performance was evaluated. In the post-test
stage, the reading activities of the two groups were carried out with the
intervention of virtual reality and augmented reality. While the pre-test
results showed no significant difference between the groups, the post-test
results indicated that the augmented reality intervention better supported the
students' retelling performance than virtual reality. However, there was no
significant difference between the two groups in the sub-categories of setting
and characters. Additionally, the virtual reality intervention did not create a
significant difference in the sub-categories of characters, event/plot,
problem, solution, and total score compared to the printed text reading
activity. However, it produced better results in the setting sub-category than
the printed text. A positive difference was observed in all sub-categories when
the augmented reality intervention was compared to the printed text reading
activity. AR showed greater benefits for retelling performance in this study,
but further research is needed on long-term retention.<br>
DOI: 10.3886/e225281v1-173921
title: The effects of virtual reality and augmented reality technologies on students' story retelling performance

description: This study aims to compare the retelling performance of two
groups that engaged in reading activities with virtual reality and augmented
reality texts. Furthermore, the results of the interventions using these
technologies were compared with the results of the printed text reading
activity. The study participants comprised 100 students aged 12 to 13 years
studying in a secondary school. The researchers evaluated the students'
story-retelling performance through a rubric in the study. In the pre-test
stage, the students performed a paper-based reading activity on the texts in
the coursebook and their retelling performance was evaluated. In the post-test
stage, the reading activities of the two groups were carried out with the
intervention of virtual reality and augmented reality. While the pre-test
results showed no significant difference between the groups, the post-test
results indicated that the augmented reality intervention better supported the
students' retelling performance than virtual reality. However, there was no
significant difference between the two groups in the sub-categories of setting
and characters. Additionally, the virtual reality intervention did not create a
significant difference in the sub-categories of characters, event/plot,
problem, solution, and total score compared to the printed text reading
activity. However, it produced better results in the setting sub-category than
the printed text. A positive difference was observed in all sub-categories when
the augmented reality intervention was compared to the printed text reading
activity. AR showed greater benefits for retelling performance in this study,
but further research is needed on long-term retention.<br>
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144684
title: Table 1 in A new species and a new record of Hypogastrura (Collembola, Hypogastruridae) from Miguel Angel Blanco shaft (Jaen, Spain)

description: Table 1. Morphological differences between Hypogastrura herrerosvelai sp. nov and the palaearctic members of the monticola group. Abbreviations: A5G = Abd. V granulation, number of granules between p1 chaetae (F = fine, C = coarse); DG = Dens granulation (F = fine, C = coarse, M = moderate); SIV = Number of sensilla on Ant. IV, dorsal+outer; TH = Tenent hairs on tibiotarsi (tips: P = pointed, B = blunt, C = clavate); VT = Number of chaetae on ventral tube; D/M = Ratio dens:mucro; As/P = Ratio anal spine/basal papilla; m6T2 = Th. II m6 chaeta; m6T3 = Th. III m6 chaeta (“+” = present, " - " = absent); mA4 = Abd. IV m chaetae; mA5 = number of m chaetae on Abd. V; pA5 = number of p chaetae between sensory chaetae on Abd V. References: od = original description; 1 = Babenko et al. 1994; 2 = Cassagnau 1959; 3 = Gisin 1949; 4 = Jordana et al. 1997; 5 = Selga 1966; 6 = Skarżyński 2009; 7 = Stach 1946; 8 = Steiner 1955; 9 = Thibaud et al. 2004; 10 = own data.
A5GDGSIVTHVTD/MAs/Pm6T2m6T3mA4mA5pA5LenghtDistributionReferencesmonticolaFF3+2P4+44-51+?11+113+32+21.5Central Europe7(od)m1, 2, pluri-m1, 4, 51, 6, 9papillataFM3+3B/P4+430.5+?5+54+42+21.1Europe meridional3(od)5m1-5m1, 2, 4, 51, 9papillata sensu JordanaFM3+3B4+430.5--5+51+12+2?Portugal4m1-5m3hispanicaFF3+2C5+531++6+62+23+31.4Spain8(od)m1-6m1,34, 9dasiensisCF/M3+2C4+43-41++5+52+22+21.5Spain5(od)m1, 2, 4-6m1,34, 9subpapillataCC3+3B/P4+43<1++6+622+21.0Russia, Siberia1(od)3-4m1-6m1, 29hatiparaeCF3+3C4+431*++6+61+12+21.0-1.1Caucasus1(od)3-4m1-6m19elevataCF3+3(4)P4+43-41?????0.9-1.0France, Pyrenees2(od)6, 9herrerosvelai sp. nov.FF3+2P/B4+44-5<1-- (+)6+6-2+21.0-1.3Spain10(od)7-10m1-6
description: Published as part of Arbea, Javier I. & Fernandez, Toni Perez, 2020, A new species and a new record of Hypogastrura (Collembola, Hypogastruridae) from Miguel Angel Blanco shaft (Jaen, Spain), pp. 73 in Subterranean Biology 35 on page 73, DOI: 10.3897/subtbiol.35.54257
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144685
title: Table 1 in A new species and a new record of Hypogastrura (Collembola, Hypogastruridae) from Miguel Angel Blanco shaft (Jaen, Spain)

description: Table 1. Morphological differences between Hypogastrura herrerosvelai sp. nov and the palaearctic members of the monticola group. Abbreviations: A5G = Abd. V granulation, number of granules between p1 chaetae (F = fine, C = coarse); DG = Dens granulation (F = fine, C = coarse, M = moderate); SIV = Number of sensilla on Ant. IV, dorsal+outer; TH = Tenent hairs on tibiotarsi (tips: P = pointed, B = blunt, C = clavate); VT = Number of chaetae on ventral tube; D/M = Ratio dens:mucro; As/P = Ratio anal spine/basal papilla; m6T2 = Th. II m6 chaeta; m6T3 = Th. III m6 chaeta (“+” = present, " - " = absent); mA4 = Abd. IV m chaetae; mA5 = number of m chaetae on Abd. V; pA5 = number of p chaetae between sensory chaetae on Abd V. References: od = original description; 1 = Babenko et al. 1994; 2 = Cassagnau 1959; 3 = Gisin 1949; 4 = Jordana et al. 1997; 5 = Selga 1966; 6 = Skarżyński 2009; 7 = Stach 1946; 8 = Steiner 1955; 9 = Thibaud et al. 2004; 10 = own data.
A5GDGSIVTHVTD/MAs/Pm6T2m6T3mA4mA5pA5LenghtDistributionReferencesmonticolaFF3+2P4+44-51+?11+113+32+21.5Central Europe7(od)m1, 2, pluri-m1, 4, 51, 6, 9papillataFM3+3B/P4+430.5+?5+54+42+21.1Europe meridional3(od)5m1-5m1, 2, 4, 51, 9papillata sensu JordanaFM3+3B4+430.5--5+51+12+2?Portugal4m1-5m3hispanicaFF3+2C5+531++6+62+23+31.4Spain8(od)m1-6m1,34, 9dasiensisCF/M3+2C4+43-41++5+52+22+21.5Spain5(od)m1, 2, 4-6m1,34, 9subpapillataCC3+3B/P4+43<1++6+622+21.0Russia, Siberia1(od)3-4m1-6m1, 29hatiparaeCF3+3C4+431*++6+61+12+21.0-1.1Caucasus1(od)3-4m1-6m19elevataCF3+3(4)P4+43-41?????0.9-1.0France, Pyrenees2(od)6, 9herrerosvelai sp. nov.FF3+2P/B4+44-5<1-- (+)6+6-2+21.0-1.3Spain10(od)7-10m1-6
description: Published as part of Arbea, Javier I. & Fernandez, Toni Perez, 2020, A new species and a new record of Hypogastrura (Collembola, Hypogastruridae) from Miguel Angel Blanco shaft (Jaen, Spain), pp. 73 in Subterranean Biology 35 on page 73, DOI: 10.3897/subtbiol.35.54257
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144688
title: Table 1 in Re-establishment of Silene neglecta Ten. (Caryophyllaceae) with taxonomic notes on some related taxa

description: Table 1. Morphological variables used in morphometric analyses.
AbbreviationCharacter nameTypeRL/WRatio length/width of longest stem leafCalculated ratioEHLSLength of longest eglandular hair on lower part of stem (mm)QuantitativeEHMSLength of longest eglandular hair on middle part of stem (mm)QuantitativeGHMSLength of longest glandular hair on middle part of stem (mm)QuantitativeEHILength of longest eglandular hairs on inflorescence axis (mm)QuantitativeGHILength of longest glandular hairs on inflorescence axis (mm)QuantitativeRF/cmRatio number of flowers/cmCalculated ratioCLLFLength of calyx of lowest flower (mm)QuantitativeTLLength of longest calyx tooth (mm)QuantitativeTWWidth of longest calyx tooth (mm)QuantitativeRCL/TLRatio calyx length/ calyx tooth lengthCalculated ratioEHCLLength of longest eglandular hair between calyx veins (mm)1QuantitativeGHCLLength of longest glandular hair between calyx veins (mm)1QuantitativeEHCLVLength of longest eglandular hair on calyx veins (mm)1QuantitativeGHCLVLength of longest glandular hairs on calyx veins (mm)1QuantitativeMHCMain type of hairs on calyx1QualitativePLPetal limb incision2QualitativeSHStamen filament pubescence3QualitativeGLGonophore length (mm)QuantitativeSLLargest seed length (mm)QuantitativeSWLargest seed width (mm)Quantitative
10: mainly eglandular; 1: approximately equal amounts of eglandular and glandular hairs; 2: mainly glandular. 21: incision> 50% of limb length; 0 <50% length of limb length. 30: all stamens glabrous; 1: 50% stamens hairy; 2: all stamens hairy.
description: Published as part of Saez, Llorenc, Mesbah, Melilia, Lopez-Alvarado, Javier, Bacchetta, Gianluigi, Mokni, Ridha El, Peruzzi, Lorenzo & Oxelman, Bengt, 2022, Re-establishment of Silene neglecta Ten. (Caryophyllaceae) with taxonomic notes on some related taxa, pp. 143 in PhytoKeys 195 on page 143, DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.195.81370
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144689
title: Table 1 in Re-establishment of Silene neglecta Ten. (Caryophyllaceae) with taxonomic notes on some related taxa

description: Table 1. Morphological variables used in morphometric analyses.
AbbreviationCharacter nameTypeRL/WRatio length/width of longest stem leafCalculated ratioEHLSLength of longest eglandular hair on lower part of stem (mm)QuantitativeEHMSLength of longest eglandular hair on middle part of stem (mm)QuantitativeGHMSLength of longest glandular hair on middle part of stem (mm)QuantitativeEHILength of longest eglandular hairs on inflorescence axis (mm)QuantitativeGHILength of longest glandular hairs on inflorescence axis (mm)QuantitativeRF/cmRatio number of flowers/cmCalculated ratioCLLFLength of calyx of lowest flower (mm)QuantitativeTLLength of longest calyx tooth (mm)QuantitativeTWWidth of longest calyx tooth (mm)QuantitativeRCL/TLRatio calyx length/ calyx tooth lengthCalculated ratioEHCLLength of longest eglandular hair between calyx veins (mm)1QuantitativeGHCLLength of longest glandular hair between calyx veins (mm)1QuantitativeEHCLVLength of longest eglandular hair on calyx veins (mm)1QuantitativeGHCLVLength of longest glandular hairs on calyx veins (mm)1QuantitativeMHCMain type of hairs on calyx1QualitativePLPetal limb incision2QualitativeSHStamen filament pubescence3QualitativeGLGonophore length (mm)QuantitativeSLLargest seed length (mm)QuantitativeSWLargest seed width (mm)Quantitative
10: mainly eglandular; 1: approximately equal amounts of eglandular and glandular hairs; 2: mainly glandular. 21: incision> 50% of limb length; 0 <50% length of limb length. 30: all stamens glabrous; 1: 50% stamens hairy; 2: all stamens hairy.
description: Published as part of Saez, Llorenc, Mesbah, Melilia, Lopez-Alvarado, Javier, Bacchetta, Gianluigi, Mokni, Ridha El, Peruzzi, Lorenzo & Oxelman, Bengt, 2022, Re-establishment of Silene neglecta Ten. (Caryophyllaceae) with taxonomic notes on some related taxa, pp. 143 in PhytoKeys 195 on page 143, DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.195.81370
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14195257
title: EMIC Wave Event List from Van Allen Probes

description: EMIC Wave Event List during September 2012 to October 2019 from Van Allen Probes A and B. 

 

You are free to use this for your research. However, before doing so, don't hesitate to get in touch with Remya Bhanu at remyaphysics@gmail.com.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14195258
title: EMIC Wave Event List from Van Allen Probes

description: EMIC Wave Event List during September 2012 to October 2019 from Van Allen Probes A and B. 

 

You are free to use this for your research. However, before doing so, don't hesitate to get in touch with Remya Bhanu at remyaphysics@gmail.com.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144696
title: Table 1 in Thailandorchestia rhizophila sp. nov., a new genus and species of driftwood hopper (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Protorchestiidae) from Thailand

description: Table 1. Comparison of diagnostic characteristics in different protorchestiid genera.
GenusMP palp article 2 distomedial lobeLMD lacinia mobilisG1 sexual dimorphismCarpi of P4:P3P6-7 sexual dimorphismP7 postero- distal lobeU1 outer ramusU2 outer ramus marginal setaeU3 robust setae on peduncleU3 ramusNumber of setae per telsonic lobeCarpentariawell developed4-dentateabsent, palm obtusesubequalabsentpresentlinear without marginal setaepresent1-4bud-like3-6Cochinorchestiapresent4-dentateabsent, palm transverselongerunknownpresentspoon-shape with marginal setaeabsent1linear2Eorchestiaabsent4-dentateabsent, palm transverselongerabsentpresentlinear without marginal setaeabsent3linear1-2Microrchestiawell developed4-dentatepresent, palm transverselongerpresentpresentlinear without marginal setaeabsent2linear2Neorchestiaabsent5-dentateabsent, palm transverselongerunknownpresentlinear without marginal setaeabsent2linear1Protorchestiaabsent5-dentateabsent, palm transversesubequalabsentpresentlinear without marginal setaeabsent3linear2Thailandorchestia gen. nov.absent4-dentatepresent, palm transverselongerpresentabsentlinear with marginal setaeabsent2linear2
description: Published as part of Wongkamhaeng, Koraon, Dumrongrojwattana, Pongrat, Sumitrakij, Ratchaneewarn & Keetapithchayakul, Tosaphol Saetung, 2022, Thailandorchestia rhizophila sp. nov., a new genus and species of driftwood hopper (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Protorchestiidae) from Thailand, pp. 139 in ZooKeys 1099 on page 139, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1099.82949
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144697
title: Table 1 in Thailandorchestia rhizophila sp. nov., a new genus and species of driftwood hopper (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Protorchestiidae) from Thailand

description: Table 1. Comparison of diagnostic characteristics in different protorchestiid genera.
GenusMP palp article 2 distomedial lobeLMD lacinia mobilisG1 sexual dimorphismCarpi of P4:P3P6-7 sexual dimorphismP7 postero- distal lobeU1 outer ramusU2 outer ramus marginal setaeU3 robust setae on peduncleU3 ramusNumber of setae per telsonic lobeCarpentariawell developed4-dentateabsent, palm obtusesubequalabsentpresentlinear without marginal setaepresent1-4bud-like3-6Cochinorchestiapresent4-dentateabsent, palm transverselongerunknownpresentspoon-shape with marginal setaeabsent1linear2Eorchestiaabsent4-dentateabsent, palm transverselongerabsentpresentlinear without marginal setaeabsent3linear1-2Microrchestiawell developed4-dentatepresent, palm transverselongerpresentpresentlinear without marginal setaeabsent2linear2Neorchestiaabsent5-dentateabsent, palm transverselongerunknownpresentlinear without marginal setaeabsent2linear1Protorchestiaabsent5-dentateabsent, palm transversesubequalabsentpresentlinear without marginal setaeabsent3linear2Thailandorchestia gen. nov.absent4-dentatepresent, palm transverselongerpresentabsentlinear with marginal setaeabsent2linear2
description: Published as part of Wongkamhaeng, Koraon, Dumrongrojwattana, Pongrat, Sumitrakij, Ratchaneewarn & Keetapithchayakul, Tosaphol Saetung, 2022, Thailandorchestia rhizophila sp. nov., a new genus and species of driftwood hopper (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Protorchestiidae) from Thailand, pp. 139 in ZooKeys 1099 on page 139, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1099.82949
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144698
title: Table 1 in Delineation of two new, highly similar species of Taiwanese Cylindera tiger beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Cicindelinae) based on morphological and molecular evidence

description: Table 1. The primer pairs used in PCR.
GenesPrimersSequences (5 ’–3’)ReferencesCOICol46 (+)AACCATAAAGATATTGGAACTsai et al. 2014Col731 (-)CCAAAAAATCAAAATAAATGTTGTsai et al. 2014LCO1490 (+)GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGGFolmer et al. 1994HCO2198 (-)TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCAFolmer et al. 199416S rDNA16SR21(+)GCCTGTTTATCAAAAACATYeh et al. 200416S22 (-)CCGGTCTGAACTCAGATCAYeh et al. 200428S rDNA28Se (+)TCCGTAACTTCGGAACAAGGATTLin et al. 200328Sf (-)TGTACCGCCCCAGTCAAACTLin et al. 2003
description: Published as part of Chou, Ming-Hsun & Yeh, Wen-Bin, 2019, Delineation of two new, highly similar species of Taiwanese Cylindera tiger beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Cicindelinae) based on morphological and molecular evidence, pp. 34 in ZooKeys 875 on page 34, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.875.37856
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15144699
title: Table 1 in Delineation of two new, highly similar species of Taiwanese Cylindera tiger beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Cicindelinae) based on morphological and molecular evidence

description: Table 1. The primer pairs used in PCR.
GenesPrimersSequences (5 ’–3’)ReferencesCOICol46 (+)AACCATAAAGATATTGGAACTsai et al. 2014Col731 (-)CCAAAAAATCAAAATAAATGTTGTsai et al. 2014LCO1490 (+)GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGGFolmer et al. 1994HCO2198 (-)TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCAFolmer et al. 199416S rDNA16SR21(+)GCCTGTTTATCAAAAACATYeh et al. 200416S22 (-)CCGGTCTGAACTCAGATCAYeh et al. 200428S rDNA28Se (+)TCCGTAACTTCGGAACAAGGATTLin et al. 200328Sf (-)TGTACCGCCCCAGTCAAACTLin et al. 2003
description: Published as part of Chou, Ming-Hsun & Yeh, Wen-Bin, 2019, Delineation of two new, highly similar species of Taiwanese Cylindera tiger beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Cicindelinae) based on morphological and molecular evidence, pp. 34 in ZooKeys 875 on page 34, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.875.37856