cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526109
title: Appendix D. A figure showing the relationship between the mean group size of juvenile kelp, gopher, and black-and-yellow (KGB) rockfish encountered during underwater visual transects and the average density of fish within entire kelp beds.

description: A figure showing the relationship between the mean group size of juvenile kelp, gopher, and black-and-yellow (KGB) rockfish encountered during underwater visual transects and the average density of fish within entire kelp beds.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526109.v1
title: Appendix D. A figure showing the relationship between the mean group size of juvenile kelp, gopher, and black-and-yellow (KGB) rockfish encountered during underwater visual transects and the average density of fish within entire kelp beds.

description: A figure showing the relationship between the mean group size of juvenile kelp, gopher, and black-and-yellow (KGB) rockfish encountered during underwater visual transects and the average density of fish within entire kelp beds.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526106
title: Appendix A. A model of wave breaking and maximum flow speed.

description: A model of wave breaking and maximum flow speed.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526106.v1
title: Appendix A. A model of wave breaking and maximum flow speed.

description: A model of wave breaking and maximum flow speed.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526103
title: Appendix A. Statistical tables (means and results of analysis from the field experiments).

description: Statistical tables (means and results of analysis from the field experiments).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526103.v1
title: Appendix A. Statistical tables (means and results of analysis from the field experiments).

description: Statistical tables (means and results of analysis from the field experiments).
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526100
title: Appendix A. Natural history of the system.

description: Natural history of the system.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526100.v1
title: Appendix A. Natural history of the system.

description: Natural history of the system.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526097
title: Appendix B. Experimental production of Heterorhabditis marelatus nematodes within hosts.

description: Experimental production of Heterorhabditis marelatus nematodes within hosts.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526097.v1
title: Appendix B. Experimental production of Heterorhabditis marelatus nematodes within hosts.

description: Experimental production of Heterorhabditis marelatus nematodes within hosts.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526094
title: Appendix C. Daily nematode mortality rates in lupine and grassland rhizospheres, watered and ambient conditions, for March–October 2002, estimated using a negative binomial model.

description: Daily nematode mortality rates in lupine and grassland rhizospheres, watered and ambient conditions, for March–October 2002, estimated using a negative binomial model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526094.v1
title: Appendix C. Daily nematode mortality rates in lupine and grassland rhizospheres, watered and ambient conditions, for March–October 2002, estimated using a negative binomial model.

description: Daily nematode mortality rates in lupine and grassland rhizospheres, watered and ambient conditions, for March–October 2002, estimated using a negative binomial model.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526091
title: Appendix A. A description of the initial modeling of survival and resighting probabilities.

description: A description of the initial modeling of survival and resighting probabilities.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526091.v1
title: Appendix A. A description of the initial modeling of survival and resighting probabilities.

description: A description of the initial modeling of survival and resighting probabilities.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526088
title: Appendix A. Results of statistical analyses.

description: Results of statistical analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526088.v1
title: Appendix A. Results of statistical analyses.

description: Results of statistical analyses.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526085
title: Data Paper. Data Paper

description: File List Boulder_Sites.txt -- 66 records, not including header row Boulder_Abundance.txt -- 330 records, not including header Description The purpose of this data set was to investigate the effects of habitat characteristics and urbanization on grassland butterfly diversity. We sampled butterflies at 66 sites in Boulder County Open Space in the years 1999 and 2000. We tested for effects of habitat characteristics (grassland type and quality) and landscape context (percentage surrounding urbanization) on butterfly diversity and abundance. Although both habitat characteristics did affect butterfly diversity, landscape context did not. The data contain butterfly species diversity and individual species’ abundance for the five periods sampled: July 1999, August 1999, June 2000, July 2000, and August 2000. Our samples included 58 species from five butterfly families: Hesperiidae (17 species), Papilionidae (4 species), Pieridae (7 species), Lycaenidae (11 species), and Nymphalidae (19 species). These data include endangered butterfly species, as well as surveys from relictual tallgrass prairie. There is some limitation to these data, as our sampling was not exhaustive through the year. That is, many species we observed also occur outside of the time-period sampled, and some butterfly species may not have been present as adults during the months of June, July, and August, and thus were not sampled. We present these data with the hope that they be combined with future surveys using the methods described here to constitute a long-term data set. These data will undoubtedly be useful in understanding temporal changes in butterfly abundance and diversity, effects of urbanization on different taxa, and determinants of local and large-scale faunal diversity. <i> Key words:</i> <i>Lepidoptera; Boulder County Open Space, Colorado (USA); butterflies; biodiversity; habitat; urbanization; climate change.</i>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526085.v1
title: Data Paper. Data Paper

description: File List Boulder_Sites.txt -- 66 records, not including header row Boulder_Abundance.txt -- 330 records, not including header Description The purpose of this data set was to investigate the effects of habitat characteristics and urbanization on grassland butterfly diversity. We sampled butterflies at 66 sites in Boulder County Open Space in the years 1999 and 2000. We tested for effects of habitat characteristics (grassland type and quality) and landscape context (percentage surrounding urbanization) on butterfly diversity and abundance. Although both habitat characteristics did affect butterfly diversity, landscape context did not. The data contain butterfly species diversity and individual species’ abundance for the five periods sampled: July 1999, August 1999, June 2000, July 2000, and August 2000. Our samples included 58 species from five butterfly families: Hesperiidae (17 species), Papilionidae (4 species), Pieridae (7 species), Lycaenidae (11 species), and Nymphalidae (19 species). These data include endangered butterfly species, as well as surveys from relictual tallgrass prairie. There is some limitation to these data, as our sampling was not exhaustive through the year. That is, many species we observed also occur outside of the time-period sampled, and some butterfly species may not have been present as adults during the months of June, July, and August, and thus were not sampled. We present these data with the hope that they be combined with future surveys using the methods described here to constitute a long-term data set. These data will undoubtedly be useful in understanding temporal changes in butterfly abundance and diversity, effects of urbanization on different taxa, and determinants of local and large-scale faunal diversity. <i> Key words:</i> <i>Lepidoptera; Boulder County Open Space, Colorado (USA); butterflies; biodiversity; habitat; urbanization; climate change.</i>
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526082
title: Appendix A. The complete list of the models of temporary emigration.

description: The complete list of the models of temporary emigration.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526082.v1
title: Appendix A. The complete list of the models of temporary emigration.

description: The complete list of the models of temporary emigration.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526079
title: Appendix B. Results of the closure tests for each site and year.

description: Results of the closure tests for each site and year.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526079.v1
title: Appendix B. Results of the closure tests for each site and year.

description: Results of the closure tests for each site and year.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526076
title: Appendix A. Analysis of spatial and temporal variation in overall apparent annual survival rates for yellow-bellied marmots using Cormack-Jolly-Seber models.

description: Analysis of spatial and temporal variation in overall apparent annual survival rates for yellow-bellied marmots using Cormack-Jolly-Seber models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526076.v1
title: Appendix A. Analysis of spatial and temporal variation in overall apparent annual survival rates for yellow-bellied marmots using Cormack-Jolly-Seber models.

description: Analysis of spatial and temporal variation in overall apparent annual survival rates for yellow-bellied marmots using Cormack-Jolly-Seber models.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526073
title: Appendix B. A table showing the effect of environmental covariates on the spatial and temporal variation in age-specific survival rates.

description: A table showing the effect of environmental covariates on the spatial and temporal variation in age-specific survival rates.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526070
title: Appendix A. A table and figure describing the biological community of this study.

description: A table and figure describing the biological community of this study.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526070.v1
title: Appendix A. A table and figure describing the biological community of this study.

description: A table and figure describing the biological community of this study.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526067
title: Appendix B. A figure showing temporal richness trajectories for dispersal rate, dispersal pathway, and initial beta at three spatial scales.

description: A figure showing temporal richness trajectories for dispersal rate, dispersal pathway, and initial beta at three spatial scales.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526067.v1
title: Appendix B. A figure showing temporal richness trajectories for dispersal rate, dispersal pathway, and initial beta at three spatial scales.

description: A figure showing temporal richness trajectories for dispersal rate, dispersal pathway, and initial beta at three spatial scales.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526064
title: Appendix C. Figures showing single species responses to experimental treatments.

description: Figures showing single species responses to experimental treatments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526064.v1
title: Appendix C. Figures showing single species responses to experimental treatments.

description: Figures showing single species responses to experimental treatments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526061
title: Appendix A. A list of the species used in the experiment and culture sources.

description: A list of the species used in the experiment and culture sources.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526061.v1
title: Appendix A. A list of the species used in the experiment and culture sources.

description: A list of the species used in the experiment and culture sources.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526058
title: Appendix B. A table containing species combinations for all composition treatments.

description: A table containing species combinations for all composition treatments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526058.v1
title: Appendix B. A table containing species combinations for all composition treatments.

description: A table containing species combinations for all composition treatments.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526055
title: Appendix A. A photograph of the Corralitos ecotone.

description: A photograph of the Corralitos ecotone.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526055.v1
title: Appendix A. A photograph of the Corralitos ecotone.

description: A photograph of the Corralitos ecotone.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526052
title: Appendix A. A table showing habitat quality and soil conditions at the three sites in southern Switzerland.

description: A table showing habitat quality and soil conditions at the three sites in southern Switzerland.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526049
title: Appendix B. A table showing the sown species, their provenances, results of seed mass measurements, methods and results of germination tests, and the occurrence of established populations in the study sites.

description: A table showing the sown species, their provenances, results of seed mass measurements, methods and results of germination tests, and the occurrence of established populations in the study sites.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526049.v1
title: Appendix B. A table showing the sown species, their provenances, results of seed mass measurements, methods and results of germination tests, and the occurrence of established populations in the study sites.

description: A table showing the sown species, their provenances, results of seed mass measurements, methods and results of germination tests, and the occurrence of established populations in the study sites.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526046
title: Appendix C. A table showing establishment success of seedlings emerged from the soil seed bank at the three study sites two years after beginning the experiments in 1998 or 1999.

description: A table showing establishment success of seedlings emerged from the soil seed bank at the three study sites two years after beginning the experiments in 1998 or 1999.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526046.v1
title: Appendix C. A table showing establishment success of seedlings emerged from the soil seed bank at the three study sites two years after beginning the experiments in 1998 or 1999.

description: A table showing establishment success of seedlings emerged from the soil seed bank at the three study sites two years after beginning the experiments in 1998 or 1999.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526043
title: Appendix D. A table showing the effects of sowing year and year×site interaction on the performance of the sown species three years after sowing.

description: A table showing the effects of sowing year and year×site interaction on the performance of the sown species three years after sowing.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526043.v1
title: Appendix D. A table showing the effects of sowing year and year×site interaction on the performance of the sown species three years after sowing.

description: A table showing the effects of sowing year and year×site interaction on the performance of the sown species three years after sowing.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526040
title: Appendix E. A table showing the performance of 22 species three years after sowing in 1998 and 1999 at Negrentino.

description: A table showing the performance of 22 species three years after sowing in 1998 and 1999 at Negrentino.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526040.v1
title: Appendix E. A table showing the performance of 22 species three years after sowing in 1998 and 1999 at Negrentino.

description: A table showing the performance of 22 species three years after sowing in 1998 and 1999 at Negrentino.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526037
title: Appendix A. A table presenting counts of flowering plants in focal remnant Echinacea populations over three years.

description: A table presenting counts of flowering plants in focal remnant Echinacea populations over three years.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526037.v1
title: Appendix A. A table presenting counts of flowering plants in focal remnant Echinacea populations over three years.

description: A table presenting counts of flowering plants in focal remnant Echinacea populations over three years.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526034
title: Appendix B. Figures showing the scale dependence of the relationship between individual-based Echinacea density and four individual annual reproductive fitness measures during two years.

description: Figures showing the scale dependence of the relationship between individual-based Echinacea density and four individual annual reproductive fitness measures during two years.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526034.v1
title: Appendix B. Figures showing the scale dependence of the relationship between individual-based Echinacea density and four individual annual reproductive fitness measures during two years.

description: Figures showing the scale dependence of the relationship between individual-based Echinacea density and four individual annual reproductive fitness measures during two years.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526031
title: Appendix C. A table presenting regression coefficients of population size on four annual reproductive fitness measures when the preserve is not included.

description: A table presenting regression coefficients of population size on four annual reproductive fitness measures when the preserve is not included.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526031.v1
title: Appendix C. A table presenting regression coefficients of population size on four annual reproductive fitness measures when the preserve is not included.

description: A table presenting regression coefficients of population size on four annual reproductive fitness measures when the preserve is not included.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526028
title: Appendix D. Figures showing the distribution of isolation and density of individual Echinacea plants in the preserve compared to those in surrounding remnants.

description: Figures showing the distribution of isolation and density of individual Echinacea plants in the preserve compared to those in surrounding remnants.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526028.v1
title: Appendix D. Figures showing the distribution of isolation and density of individual Echinacea plants in the preserve compared to those in surrounding remnants.

description: Figures showing the distribution of isolation and density of individual Echinacea plants in the preserve compared to those in surrounding remnants.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526025
title: Appendix A. The number of ant workers foraging on Ferocactus wislizeni plants during April–June 2003 and July–September 2003.

description: The number of ant workers foraging on Ferocactus wislizeni plants during April–June 2003 and July–September 2003.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526025.v1
title: Appendix A. The number of ant workers foraging on Ferocactus wislizeni plants during April–June 2003 and July–September 2003.

description: The number of ant workers foraging on Ferocactus wislizeni plants during April–June 2003 and July–September 2003.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526022
title: Appendix B. Summary data distinguishing four ant species that visit the extrafloral nectaries of Ferocactus wislizeni, and reproduction on plants typically tended by those ants.

description: Summary data distinguishing four ant species that visit the extrafloral nectaries of Ferocactus wislizeni, and reproduction on plants typically tended by those ants.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526022.v1
title: Appendix B. Summary data distinguishing four ant species that visit the extrafloral nectaries of Ferocactus wislizeni, and reproduction on plants typically tended by those ants.

description: Summary data distinguishing four ant species that visit the extrafloral nectaries of Ferocactus wislizeni, and reproduction on plants typically tended by those ants.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526019
title: Appendix A. A list of all fungi used in laboratory experiments and those field plants sampled multiple times.

description: A list of all fungi used in laboratory experiments and those field plants sampled multiple times.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526019.v1
title: Appendix A. A list of all fungi used in laboratory experiments and those field plants sampled multiple times.

description: A list of all fungi used in laboratory experiments and those field plants sampled multiple times.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526016
title: Appendix A. Technical details on parameter estimation.

description: Technical details on parameter estimation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526016.v1
title: Appendix A. Technical details on parameter estimation.

description: Technical details on parameter estimation.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526013
title: Supplement 1. R and WinBUGS code for fitting the model of species occurrence and detection and example data sets.

description: File List breedingBirdData.txt<br> butterflyData.txt<br> ExampleSession.txt<br> MultiSpeciesSiteOcc.R<br> MultiSpeciesSiteOccModel.txt<br> CumNumSpeciesPresent.R Description “breedingBirdData.txt” is an example data set in ASCII comma-delimited format. Each row corresponds to data for a single species observed in the avian survey. The 50 columns correspond to 50 sample locations. “butterflyData.txt” is an example data set in ASCII comma-delimited format. Each row corresponds to data for a single species observed in the butterfly survey. The 20 columns correspond to 20 sample locations. “ExampleSession.txt” illustrates an example session in R where the butterfly data are read into memory and then analyzed using the R and WinBUGS code. “MultiSpeciesSiteOcc.R” defines an R function for fitting the model of species occurrence and detection to data. This function specifies a Gibbs sampler wherein 55000 random draws are computed for each of 4 different Markov chains. These computations may require nontrivial execution times. For example, analysis of the avian data required about 4 hours using a computer equipped with a 3.20 GHz Pentium 4 processor. Analysis of the butterfly data required about 1.5 hours. “MultiSpeciesSiteOccModel.txt” contains WinBUGS code for specifying the model of species occurrence and detection. “CumNumSpeciesPresent.R” defines an R function for computing a sample of the posterior-predictive distribution of a species-accumulation curve whose abscissa ranges from 1 to nsites sites.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526013.v1
title: Supplement 1. R and WinBUGS code for fitting the model of species occurrence and detection and example data sets.

description: File List breedingBirdData.txt<br> butterflyData.txt<br> ExampleSession.txt<br> MultiSpeciesSiteOcc.R<br> MultiSpeciesSiteOccModel.txt<br> CumNumSpeciesPresent.R Description “breedingBirdData.txt” is an example data set in ASCII comma-delimited format. Each row corresponds to data for a single species observed in the avian survey. The 50 columns correspond to 50 sample locations. “butterflyData.txt” is an example data set in ASCII comma-delimited format. Each row corresponds to data for a single species observed in the butterfly survey. The 20 columns correspond to 20 sample locations. “ExampleSession.txt” illustrates an example session in R where the butterfly data are read into memory and then analyzed using the R and WinBUGS code. “MultiSpeciesSiteOcc.R” defines an R function for fitting the model of species occurrence and detection to data. This function specifies a Gibbs sampler wherein 55000 random draws are computed for each of 4 different Markov chains. These computations may require nontrivial execution times. For example, analysis of the avian data required about 4 hours using a computer equipped with a 3.20 GHz Pentium 4 processor. Analysis of the butterfly data required about 1.5 hours. “MultiSpeciesSiteOccModel.txt” contains WinBUGS code for specifying the model of species occurrence and detection. “CumNumSpeciesPresent.R” defines an R function for computing a sample of the posterior-predictive distribution of a species-accumulation curve whose abscissa ranges from 1 to nsites sites.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526010
title: Supplement 1. Data and R code for analyses summarized in Table 1.

description: File List readme.txt <br> Rfiles.Rdump Description Please read the file readme.txt
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.3526010.v1
title: Supplement 1. Data and R code for analyses summarized in Table 1.

description: File List readme.txt <br> Rfiles.Rdump Description Please read the file readme.txt