cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5064/f61mnql0
title: Organizational Response to Emerging Threats: Lessons from NATO and the European Union’s Responses to Peacebuilding, Cyber Threats and Energy Security

description: &lt;p&gt;"Organizational Response to Emerging Threats" is a project that addresses three separate threat areas -- cybersecurity, peacekeeping and energy security. The data collection for cybersecurity and energy security has been completed. As of June 2019, the data collection for peacekeeping is ongoing. The project documents are organized around three topics, reflected in the filenames -- cybersecurity, peacekeeping and energy security.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The overall purpose/rationale of this research project is to develop a framework that explains how different international organizations (IOs) respond to various emerging threats in international relations. These threats can vary and include cybersecurity, energy security, food security, environmental security, and others. For the purpose of our study we focus on two major variables explaining organizational response: (1) IOs’ capacity to acquire and deploy organizational assets (also referred to as asset fungibility), and; (2) IOs’ ability to make swift decisions in response to changing internal and external environments. Drawing from primary sources including interviews with NATO and EU officials, we suggest a new model explaining when organizations are better equipped at addressing cyber threats, when they have capacity to response more effectively, and what they could do to improve their organizational responses in this area.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The QDR repository contains interviews with policy makers and senior bureaucrats conducted in 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 in Brussels, Belgium, and the Hague, the Netherlands. These interviews have been conducted in person or over skype. Approval to conduct interviews has been granted by the University of Cincinnati's IRB (Study ID: 2018-3371).&lt;/p&gt;
description: These are primary sources as data has been collected by a face-to-face or in person meeting and interviews.
description: As a part of the IRB approval process, the interviewees have been promised full confidentiality. Therefore, all references that could reveal interviewees' identities have been redacted in the documents.
description: Update Notes for Version 3.0
Version 3.0 is a QDR-administered technical update. Files have been reprocessed to improve digital accessibility; the content of materials remains unaltered.
DOI: 10.5064/f6833q5k
title: Hate speech and France's court of cassation

description: &lt;h3&gt;Project Summary&lt;/h3&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;This project was designed to identify the factors that influenced French Court of Cassation (the Supreme Court for criminal law) decisions in hate speech cases. We identified all 103 substantive hate speech cases reviewed by the Court of Cassation between the inception of a major anti-racism law in 1972 and the end of 2012. We then identified categories of interviewees distributed across different types (judges, prosecutors, lawyers, NGOs, academics). We combined the information gathered from these interviews with information from the written court decisions as well as archival information detailing some internal deliberations of the court. The main conclusion of the research is that French judges are influenced to a significant degree by the social identity of the victim group, but that this influence has shifted over time. In general, the court has been much more apt to uphold convictions if the targets of the hate speech were understood as vulnerable minorities who are victims of "true racism" than if the targets were societal majorities such as whites, Catholics, Christians, or "French."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;Data Abstract&lt;/h3&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;Interviewees were selected according to procedures outlined in Bleich & Pekkanen (2013). Interviews were conducted in France, primarily between July 2014 and July 2015. Most were done in person, though some are phone interviews and some were email exchanges. Most interview records submitted here are the author's summaries of the interviews rather than transcripts. They are based on simultaneous note-taking supplemented by post-interview additions and edits. A few have been edited after the fact based on the interviewee's reading of the notes and amendments. The interview data was one key portion of evidence assembled to address the question of how the French high court decided hate speech cases. Written French court decisions are typically short, and do not contain as much information as, for example, US Supreme Court decisions, nor do they contain information about divisions within the court. So the interview data reveals information that goes beyond what is available in the written record. In addition, I relied on information on internal deliberations by court-appointed representatives (judges and prosecutors) derived from an archive for which I was granted access permission. I do not have permission to share this information, nor to reproduce the original court decisions.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.5064/f68aamx3
title: Data for "How do search systems impact systematic searching? A qualitative study"

description: &lt;h3&gt; Project Summary &lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt; Objectives: Systematic reviews and other evidence synthesis projects require systematic search methods. Search systems require several essential attributes in order to support systematic search method; however, many systems used in evidence synthesis fail to meet one or more of these requirements. A qualitative study was undertaken with two aims: 1. To examine the effect of these limitations on searching, and 2. To explore how and why searchers select platforms and databases for evidence synthesis projects. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; Methods: Data were collected from interviews with twelve systematic searchers. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; Results: Analysis identified two overarching themes relating to search systems: interfaces shape search processes, and systematic searching occurs within the information market. Searchers face constraints of technology, time, and access which they must navigate while attempting to fulfill the goals and methodological requirements of evidence synthesis. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; Two publications are planned, utilizing this data collection. One will illustrate how searchers respond to the limitations they encounter in search systems and suggest potential reasons why those limitations persist. A subsequent publication will report two additional themes that pertain more broadly to searchers' role in evidence synthesis. The data for both publications were coded simultaneously, and the deposited data include the themes for both publications. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt; Selection and Organization of Shared Data &lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt; Data for "What do systematic searchers need from search systems?" includes deidentified interview transcripts (plain text), recruitment materials, study information sheet, description of participants, pre-screening form, interview guide, consent form, and coded data. &lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.5064/f6ac1qaf
title: Data for: From Bombs to Books, and Back Again? Mapping Strategies of Right-Wing Revolutionary Resistance

description: &lt;h3&gt;Project Summary&lt;/h3&gt;

This project outlines right-wing revolutionary resistance strategies post-1945: vanguardism; the cell system; leaderless resistance; and metapolitics. It argues that metapolitics became a preferred strategy for many right-wing revolutionaries during the 2000s and early 2010s, and proposes three factors that may help explain this metapolitical turn: limited opportunities for armed resistance; a subcultural style shift; and new opportunities for promoting alternative worldviews online. Finally, it theorizes about the types of threats that may emerge in the wake of this metapolitical turn, and speculates about the likelihood of a new and more violent turn in the near future.

&lt;h3&gt;Data Overview&lt;/h3&gt;

Primary data have primarily been collected online between 2012 and 2021 and consist of magazines, manuals, and online recordings in which ideological authorities discuss strategic options.
DOI: 10.5064/f6aje0np
title: The Deterrence Project

description: The study of interstate conflict, in general, and crises in particular, has a long and distinguished history at the University at Buffalo, not only in the department of political science, but in the departments of psychology, history, philosophy, and anthropology as well. In 1967 the University founded the Center for International Conflict Studies. Directed by Glenn H. Snyder, the Center's focus was on negotiation and bargaining. The Center produced one major work, Glenn H. Snyder and Paul Diesing's &lt;i&gt;Conflict Among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making, and System Structure in International Crises&lt;/i&gt;. Published in 1977 by Princeton University Press, this classic contribution remains relevant today. It was republished by Princeton in 2015.&lt;/p&gt;

The theory of interstate crisis developed in &lt;i&gt;Conflict Among Nations&lt;/i&gt; tested a number of deductive theories and models using sixteen case studies, some of which were themselves book length, written by five faculty members, one research associate, and five graduate students at the University at Buffalo. The main purpose of this project is to make these case studies, a number of working papers, and other products of the Center available to the academic community.&lt;/p&gt;

Snyder and Diesing report that they based their test of several deductive theories and models on a number of case studies. Thirteen in-depth studies were written up. Three 
others, the Bosnia crisis of 1908, the United States and Japan crisis of 1940 to 1941, and the Yom Kippur "alert crisis" of 1973 were studied but not fully developed. The 
Balkans crises of 1912 - 1913, and the Syrian-Jordan crisis of 1970 were examined "less intensively". Snyder and Diesing both took notes on theoretically relevant aspects of the case studies, which are provided as well.&lt;/p&gt;

In addition to the case studies, nine working papers were written under the auspices of the Center. Working Paper # 1 is the original typescript of Glenn Snyder's seminal "'Prisoner's Dilemma' and 'Chicken' Models in International Politics" which was subsequently published in &lt;i&gt;International Studies Quarterly&lt;/i&gt; in 1971. Working Paper # 8 does not exist as a separate document. Working Paper #7, however, contains two distinct sections, the second of which may have been intended as a separate document.&lt;/p&gt;

In addition to the working papers, some related material is provided. One is a passage that Snyder may have cut from an earlier draft of Working Paper # 1. Another is a coding sheet used by Diesing that is presumably the template he used to compose Chapter IV, "Information Processing." Two unattributed documents, both using Richardson type action-reaction models, are also included below. Paul Diesing is most likely the author of "Divided Government" and "A Non-Bargaining Model." It is possible, however, that Dean Pruitt may also have written them.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.5064/f63776w4
title: Data for: Authoritarian apprehensions: Ideology, judgment, and mourning in Syria

description: &lt;h2&gt;Project Summary&lt;/h2&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;In &lt;em&gt;Authoritarian Apprehensions&lt;/em&gt;, Lisa Wedeen draws on her decades-long engagement with Syria to analyze the revolutionary exhilaration of the Syrian uprising’s initial days and then the devastating violence that shattered hopes of any quick undoing of dictatorship. Developing a theoretical approach within the frame of emerging forms of authoritarianism worldwide, Wedeen asks: What led a sizable part of the Syrian citizenry to stick by the regime through one atrocity after another? What happens to political judgment in a context of pervasive misinformation? And what does the Syrian example tell us about how authoritarian leaders exploit digital media to create uncertainty, political impasses, and fractures among their citizens? Based on extensive fieldwork and drawing on material from a variety of Syrian artistic practices, Wedeen lays bare the ideological investments that sustain ambivalent attachments to established organizations of political power and contribute to the ongoing challenge of pursuing political change.&lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;h2&gt;Data Abstract&lt;/h2&gt; 
&lt;p&gt; The project contains three forms of data:
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Selected video-clips from the popular television comedy series, &lt;em&gt;Day`a daay`a&lt;/em&gt; (A Forgotten Village [2008, 2010]) and from the sketches &lt;em&gt;Amal—ma fi&lt;/em&gt; (Hope—There Isn’t Any, [2004]) captioned in English by Lisa Wedeen with the help of Osama Esber, Sofia Fenner, and the staff at Sama Art International. These series are available without English subtitles at various sites online. The episodes are discussed in chapter two, “Humor in Dark Times.” &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Statistical materials analyzed in the appendix to chapter 1 of the book.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;A list of all URLs used in the book with archived versions of the links in perma.cc, webrecorder.io, or the Internet Archive&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
description: Standard access for all files. All videos are under copyright and published by permission.
description: Update Notes for Version 3.0
Version 3.0 is a QDR-administered technical update. Files have been reprocessed to improve digital accessibility; the content of materials remains unaltered.
Update Notes for Version 2
1 video file added -- "Wedeen_A Forgotten Village_In the Pitch-Dark of Night, the Full Moon Is Missed"
DOI: 10.5064/f68pqfs8
title: Translational Research Group: Ebola 100 Project

description: &lt;h3&gt;Project Summary&lt;/h3&gt;
This project was developed to contribute military voices to the larger Ebola 100 Project, which was run by a consortium of individuals and institutions and had the goal of creating a public archive of interviews with individuals involved in the West Africa Ebola outbreak of 2014-2015. Data consist of 8 transcripts of semi-structured interviews with military personnel conducted between 2015 and 2017. Also included are a project overview and an explanation of data sharing with the Ebola 100 archive.
description: Update Notes for Version 2.0
Version 2.0 is a QDR-administered technical update. Files have been reprocessed to improve digital accessibility; the content of materials remains unaltered.
DOI: 10.5064/f69jkyss
title: Anticoagulation Therapy on Discharge to Hospice Care

description: &lt;h3&gt;Project Summary&lt;/h3&gt;

The goal of this qualitative study was to better understand antithrombotic decision making on discharge to hospice care. This study was part of a larger mixed-methods study which examined the frequency and indication for antithrombotic prescriptions on discharge to hospice care. We recruited physicians who recently (&lt;1 week) discharged a patient to hospice care between July 2015-March 2016. Potential participating physicians were identified prospectively using discharge disposition data from the Department of Care Management. Within one week of the discharge date, we identified and emailed discharging physicians and invited them to participate in the study. In order to capture variation in the perspectives and opinions regarding prescribing antithrombotic therapy on discharge to hospice, we are purposefully sampled three different physician groups: 1) those that continued antithrombotic therapy, 2) those that discontinued antithrombotic therapy, and 3) those that de-escalated antithrombotic therapy (e.g. warfarin to aspirin) on discharge to hospice care.

&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;

Participants were recruited by email and were centered around decision making for a specific patient that they cared for in the previous weeks. Interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide and field notes were taken. We screened 80 discharges to hospice care and identified 27 discharges in which a decision to continue or discontinue antithrombotic therapy was made. We emailed the attending physician on these admissions and invited them to participate in an interview. We interviewed 2 physicians who continued antithrombotic therapy on discharge and 6 physicians who discontinued antithrombotic therapy on discharge.
DOI: 10.5064/f6agwujg
title: Data for: Drug Shortage Management: A Qualitative Assessment of a Collaborative Approach

description: &lt;h3&gt;Project Summary&lt;/h3&gt;
Drug shortages frequently and persistently affect healthcare institutions, posing formidable financial, logistical, and ethical challenges. Despite plentiful evidence characterizing the impact of drug shortages, there is a remarkable dearth of data describing current shortage management practices. Hospitals within the same state or region may not only take different approaches to shortages but may be unaware of shortages proximate facilities are facing. Our goal is to explore how hospitals in Michigan handle drug shortages to assess potential need for comprehensive drug shortage management resources. We conducted semi-structured interviews with diverse stakeholders throughout the state to describe experiences managing drug shortages, approaches to recent shortages, openness to inter-institutional engagement, ideas for a shared resource, and potential obstacles to implementation. To solicit additional feedback on ideas for a shared resource gathered from the interviews, we held focus groups with pharmacists, physicians, ethicists, and community representatives. Among participants representing a heterogeneous sample of institutions, three themes were consistent: (1) numerous drug shortage strategies occurring simultaneously; (2) inadequate resources and lead time to proactively manage shortages; and (3) interest in, but varied attitudes toward, a collaborative approach. These data provide insight to help develop and test a shared drug shortage management resource for enhancing fair allocation of scarce drugs. A shared resource may help institutions adopt accepted best practices and more efficiently access or share finite resources in times of shortage. 

&lt;h3&gt;Data Overview&lt;/h3&gt;
We conducted 16 semi-structured qualitative interviews with 25 participants and three focus groups with key stakeholders throughout the state of Michigan to explore institutional experiences with drug shortages, approaches to recent shortages, openness to ongoing inter-institutional engagement, ideas for a shared resource, and potential obstacles to implementation. To hear diverse experiences, and ensure any collaborative resource would be valued by most hospitals, we purposefully selected 10 heterogeneous hospitals based on the number of licensed hospital beds, type of hospital (academic, community, etc.), geographic location, critical access status, trauma designation, teaching status, religious affiliation, profit classification, and larger health-system affiliation.
description: Dedoose, 8.3.10
description: Update Notes for Version 2.0
Version 2.0 is a QDR-administered technical update. Files have been reprocessed to improve digital accessibility; the content of materials remains unaltered.
DOI: 10.5064/f6aktdbi
title: Caregiver impact on adherence to discharge instructions

description: &lt;p&gt;This study was a subset of a RCT using patient oriented discharge summaries (PODS) and looked at the caregiver impact on understanding and adherence to discharge instructions in a complex, acute medical population.&lt;p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;An admission to hospital for acute illness can be difficult for patients and lead to high levels of anxiety. Patients are given a lot of information throughout their hospital stay and instructions at discharge to follow when they get home. For complex medical patients, the ability to retain, understand, and adhere to these instructions is a critical marker of a successful transition. This study was undertaken to explore factors impacting the ability of patients to understand and adhere to instructions.&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;A qualitative design of interviews with patients and caregivers was used. Participants were adult patients and caregivers with congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or community-acquired pneumonia being discharged home from three academic acute care hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Semi structured interviews were conducted with participants within one week following their discharge from hospital. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed. Five independent researchers participated in an iterative process of coding, reviewing, and analyzing the interviews using direct content analysis. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In total, 27 participants completed qualitative interviews. Analysis revealed the role of the caregiver to be critical in its relation to the ability of patients to understand and adhere to discharge instructions. Within the topic of caregiving, we draw on three areas of insight: The first clarified how caregivers support patients after they are discharged home from the hospital. The second highlighted how caregiver involvement impacts patient understanding and adherence to discharge instructions. The third revealed system factors that influence a caregiver’s involvement when receiving discharge instructions. &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;Caregivers play an important role in the transition of a complex medical patient by impacting a patient’s ability to understand and adhere to their discharge instructions. The themes identified in this paper highlight opportunities for healthcare providers and institutions to effectively involve caregivers during transitions from acute care hospitals to home.&lt;/p&gt;
description: Patients were selected during an RCT (this is a sub-analysis within the mixed-methods RCT context). Data was collected within one week of discharge from hospital. The subset of quotes presented here are all the quotes relevant to the theme of caregiving that emerged out of 27 interviews. Interviews were conducted with both patients and caregivers.
DOI: 10.5064/f6azrvzi
title: Data for: Burundi: The Search for Constitutional Peace

description: &lt;b&gt;This is an &lt;a href="https://qdr.syr.edu/ati"&gt;Annotation for Transparent Inquiry (ATI)&lt;/a&gt; data project. &lt;/b&gt; &lt;h3&gt;The annotated article can be viewed on the &lt;a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/constitution-makers-on-constitution-making/burundi/AFEB18E1054B5F7E766339A48EB826A3#annotations:group:2Nopp9mx" &gt;publisher's website&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;h3/&gt;

&lt;/br&gt;
&lt;/br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In August of 2000, after the intervention of international mediators, the Government of Burundi and 17 political parties signed the Arusha Peace and Reconciliation Agreement for Burundi with a constitution finally being signed in 2005. Burundi’s iterative cycles of ethnic violence and the underlying mistrust between the minority Tutsi, which controlled the military, and the majority Hutu are the backdrop on which the constitutional process was set. The entire process, based on the Peace of Arusha, was plagued by anxiety and insecurity, and the country to this day has not managed to find stable footing. From the debates over parliamentary apportionment to more recent struggles of the CNDD-FDD party to erase or rewrite the agreements made at Arusha, questions remain over the constitution’s initial intentions as well as its future.&lt;/p&gt;