cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833828
title: MegaJournal Publication Data

description: This data was used in a Presentation to UBC Open on 10/22/2013 (see the livestreamed video at: http://mediasitemob1.mediagroup.ubc.ca/Mediasite/Play/2cdc95b2d56a4c56a6606a6c116a58b01d) and in a blog post for Creative Commons New Zealand on 10/23/2013 (see http://creativecommons.org.nz/2013/10/open-access-megajournals-have-they-changed-everything/). View the PPT with synced audio at: http://www.slideshare.net/PBinfield/oa-mega-journals-ubc-open-event Blurb for the talk: The Open Access ‘Megajournal’ (a class of journal defined by the success of PLOS ONE) is a reasonably recent phenomenon, but one that some observers believe is poised to change the publishing world very rapidly. A megajournal is typically understood to be an online-only journal; covering a very broad subject area; selecting content based only on scientific and methodological soundness; and with a business model which allows each article to cover its own costs. With these attributes, megajournals are not limited in potential output and as such are able to grow commensurate with any growth in submissions. PLOS ONE pioneered this category of journal and is currently expected to publish in excess of 30,000 articles in 2013 alone – possibly approaching 3% of all STM articles published that year. Recognizing the success of this model, many other publishers (such as Nature, Springer, SAGE, BioONE, PeerJ, , BMJ, F1000 and so on) have launched similar journals and each of these publishers is seeing their megajournal grow in volume, month on month. In many ways, the growth of the megajournal has been one of the most visible successes of the open access movement.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833832.v1
title: Open Access MegaJournals - UBC Open Event

description: This is the powerpoint of a Presentation to UBC Open on 10/22/2013 (see the livestreamed video at: http://mediasitemob1.mediagroup.ubc.ca/Mediasite/Play/2cdc95b2d56a4c56a6606a6c116a58b01d). A blog post for Creative Commons New Zealand was based on this ppt (see http://creativecommons.org.nz/2013/10/open-access-megajournals-have-they-changed-everything/). View the PPT with synced audio at: http://www.slideshare.net/PBinfield/oa-mega-journals-ubc-open-event Blurb for the talk: The Open Access ‘Megajournal’ (a class of journal defined by the success of PLOS ONE) is a reasonably recent phenomenon, but one that some observers believe is poised to change the publishing world very rapidly. A megajournal is typically understood to be an online-only journal; covering a very broad subject area; selecting content based only on scientific and methodological soundness; and with a business model which allows each article to cover its own costs. With these attributes, megajournals are not limited in potential output and as such are able to grow commensurate with any growth in submissions. PLOS ONE pioneered this category of journal and is currently expected to publish in excess of 30,000 articles in 2013 alone – possibly approaching 3% of all STM articles published that year. Recognizing the success of this model, many other publishers (such as Nature, Springer, SAGE, BioONE, PeerJ, , BMJ, F1000 and so on) have launched similar journals and each of these publishers is seeing their megajournal grow in volume, month on month. In many ways, the growth of the megajournal has been one of the most visible successes of the open access movement.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833839.v1
title: Gaussian Job Archive for C15H18ClNO3

description: Archive of work produced using the resources of the Imperial College High Performance Computing Service.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833851.v1
title: SC13 Publication on SMPI

description: THese are the tau traces of the NASPB CG benchmark. They were obtained by Georges Markomanolis on the Graphene cluster.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833846.v2
title: Tau trace of CG class B with 8 processors on Graphene

description: This is a Tau trace of the NASPB CG Benchmark obtained by Georges Markomanolis on the Graphene cluster.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833828.v2
title: MegaJournal Publication Data

description: This data was used in a Presentation to UBC Open on 10/22/2013 (see the livestreamed video at: http://mediasitemob1.mediagroup.ubc.ca/Mediasite/Play/2cdc95b2d56a4c56a6606a6c116a58b01d) and in a blog post for Creative Commons New Zealand on 10/23/2013 (see http://creativecommons.org.nz/2013/10/open-access-megajournals-have-they-changed-everything/). View the PPT with synced audio at: http://www.slideshare.net/PBinfield/oa-mega-journals-ubc-open-event Blurb for the talk: The Open Access ‘Megajournal’ (a class of journal defined by the success of PLOS ONE) is a reasonably recent phenomenon, but one that some observers believe is poised to change the publishing world very rapidly. A megajournal is typically understood to be an online-only journal; covering a very broad subject area; selecting content based only on scientific and methodological soundness; and with a business model which allows each article to cover its own costs. With these attributes, megajournals are not limited in potential output and as such are able to grow commensurate with any growth in submissions. PLOS ONE pioneered this category of journal and is currently expected to publish in excess of 30,000 articles in 2013 alone – possibly approaching 3% of all STM articles published that year. Recognizing the success of this model, many other publishers (such as Nature, Springer, SAGE, BioONE, PeerJ, , BMJ, F1000 and so on) have launched similar journals and each of these publishers is seeing their megajournal grow in volume, month on month. In many ways, the growth of the megajournal has been one of the most visible successes of the open access movement.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833825
title: MegaJournal Data October 2013

description: This data was used in a Presentation to UBC Open on 10/22/2013 (see the livestreamed video at: http://mediasitemob1.mediagroup.ubc.ca/Mediasite/Play/2cdc95b2d56a4c56a6606a6c116a58b01d) and in a blog post for Creative Commons New Zealand on 10/23/2013 (see http://creativecommons.org.nz/2013/10/open-access-megajournals-have-they-changed-everything/). View the PPT with synced audio at: http://www.slideshare.net/PBinfield/oa-mega-journals-ubc-open-event Blurb for the talk: The Open Access ‘Megajournal’ (a class of journal defined by the success of PLOS ONE) is a reasonably recent phenomenon, but one that some observers believe is poised to change the publishing world very rapidly. A megajournal is typically understood to be an online-only journal; covering a very broad subject area; selecting content based only on scientific and methodological soundness; and with a business model which allows each article to cover its own costs. With these attributes, megajournals are not limited in potential output and as such are able to grow commensurate with any growth in submissions. PLOS ONE pioneered this category of journal and is currently expected to publish in excess of 30,000 articles in 2013 alone – possibly approaching 3% of all STM articles published that year. Recognizing the success of this model, many other publishers (such as Nature, Springer, SAGE, BioONE, PeerJ, , BMJ, F1000 and so on) have launched similar journals and each of these publishers is seeing their megajournal grow in volume, month on month. In many ways, the growth of the megajournal has been one of the most visible successes of the open access movement.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833846.v1
title: Tau trace of CG with 8 processors on Graphene

description: This is a Tau trace of the NASPB CG Benchmark obtained by Georges Markomanolis on the Graphene cluster.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833851.v2
title: SC13 Publication on SMPI

description: THese are the tau traces of the NASPB CG benchmark. They were obtained by Georges Markomanolis on the Graphene cluster.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833828.v1
title: MegaJournal Publication Data

description: This data was used in a Presentation to UBC Open on 10/22/2013 (see the livestreamed video at: http://mediasitemob1.mediagroup.ubc.ca/Mediasite/Play/2cdc95b2d56a4c56a6606a6c116a58b01d) and in a blog post for Creative Commons New Zealand on 10/23/2013 (see http://creativecommons.org.nz/2013/10/open-access-megajournals-have-they-changed-everything/). View the PPT with synced audio at: http://www.slideshare.net/PBinfield/oa-mega-journals-ubc-open-event Blurb for the talk: The Open Access ‘Megajournal’ (a class of journal defined by the success of PLOS ONE) is a reasonably recent phenomenon, but one that some observers believe is poised to change the publishing world very rapidly. A megajournal is typically understood to be an online-only journal; covering a very broad subject area; selecting content based only on scientific and methodological soundness; and with a business model which allows each article to cover its own costs. With these attributes, megajournals are not limited in potential output and as such are able to grow commensurate with any growth in submissions. PLOS ONE pioneered this category of journal and is currently expected to publish in excess of 30,000 articles in 2013 alone – possibly approaching 3% of all STM articles published that year. Recognizing the success of this model, many other publishers (such as Nature, Springer, SAGE, BioONE, PeerJ, , BMJ, F1000 and so on) have launched similar journals and each of these publishers is seeing their megajournal grow in volume, month on month. In many ways, the growth of the megajournal has been one of the most visible successes of the open access movement.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833851.v3
title: Traces used in the PMBS 13 publication on SMPI

description: THese are the tau traces of the NASPB. They were obtained by Georges Markomanolis on the Graphene cluster.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833331
title: 熵：一个不是物理量的概念

description: 论文《熵：一个不是物理量的概念》的英文版《Entropy : A concept that is not a physical quantity》已发表在国际期刊Physics Essays [物理文集] [2012年（总25卷）第2期] 上。 英文版（原文）下载网址： http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=543672 熵：一个不是物理量的概念 张 树 风 中南大学物理学院 Email: uhsgnahz@126.com 摘 要 论证了“熵”不是物理量，即，不存在所谓的“熵”这个物理量。 当定义热机效率为:η= W/ W1 ,令元可逆循环为TV循环（即斯特令（stirling）循环），如果 ∮dQ/T =0 成立，我们可以证明 ∮dW/T =0,∮dE/T =0 同样成立。 如果认为∮dQ/T=0, ∮dW/T=0 和∮dE/T=0 定义了新的系统状态量，就显示出这样的定义应该是荒谬的。 “熵”的根本错误在于，任意可逆过程中多方过程函数Q不是T的单值函数，P-V图应该是P-V-T图，∑[(ΔQ)/T)] 写为∫dQ/T这关键一步是不成立的，即，∮dQ/T=0不成立。同样，∮dW/T=0 和 ∮dE/T=0 也都不成立。 由于玻尔兹曼所的绝对“熵”是用来解释克劳修斯“熵”的，玻尔兹曼“熵”的单位（J/K）也是从克劳修斯“熵”移植来的，克劳修斯“熵”不存在也就同时否定了玻尔兹曼“熵”。 关键词：熵、热力学、统计物理学
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833332
title: Gaussian Job Archive for C15H18ClNO3

description: Archive of work produced using the resources of the Imperial College High Performance Computing Service.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833333
title: Appendices

description: Appendices to accompany a manuscript in review at PLoS ONE
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833333.v1
title: Appendices

description: Appendices to accompany a manuscript in review at PLoS ONE
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833338.v2
title: A checklist of the freshwater macroinvertebrates of Belize

description: An evolving checklist of macroinvertebrate records made for freshwaters in Belize, Central America
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833330
title: 熵：一个不是物理量的概念

description: 论文《熵：一个不是物理量的概念》的英文版《Entropy : A concept that is not a physical quantity》已发表在国际期刊Physics Essays [物理文集] [2012年（总25卷）第2期] 上。 英文版（原文）下载网址： http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=543672 熵：一个不是物理量的概念 张 树 风 中南大学物理学院 Email: uhsgnahz@126.com 摘 要 论证了“熵”不是物理量，即，不存在所谓的“熵”这个物理量。 当定义热机效率为:η= W/ W1 ,令元可逆循环为TV循环（即斯特令（stirling）循环），如果 ∮dQ/T =0 成立，我们可以证明 ∮dW/T =0,∮dE/T =0 同样成立。 如果认为∮dQ/T=0, ∮dW/T=0 和∮dE/T=0 定义了新的系统状态量，就显示出这样的定义应该是荒谬的。 “熵”的根本错误在于，任意可逆过程中多方过程函数Q不是T的单值函数，P-V图应该是P-V-T图，∑[(ΔQ)/T)] 写为∫dQ/T这关键一步是不成立的，即，∮dQ/T=0不成立。同样，∮dW/T=0 和 ∮dE/T=0 也都不成立。 由于玻尔兹曼所的绝对“熵”是用来解释克劳修斯“熵”的，玻尔兹曼“熵”的单位（J/K）也是从克劳修斯“熵”移植来的，克劳修斯“熵”不存在也就同时否定了玻尔兹曼“熵”。 关键词：熵、热力学、统计物理学
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833851.v4
title: Traces used in the PMBS 13 publication on SMPI

description: THese are the tau traces of the NASPB. They were obtained by Georges Markomanolis on the Graphene cluster.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833329
title: Entropy: A concept that is not a physical quantity

description: PHYSICS ESSAYS ( Volume 25, Issue 2 (June 2012) ) P172~176 URL: http://physicsessays.org/toc/phes/25/2 Entropy: A concept that is not a physical quantity Shufeng-zhang College of Physics, Central South University, 932 Lushan south Road, Changsha 410083, China E-mail: uhsgnahz@126.com Abstract : This study has demonstrated that entropy is not a physical quantity, that is, the physical quantity called entropy does not exist. If the efficiency of heat engine is defined as η = W/W1, and the reversible cycle is considered to be the Stirling cycle, then, given ∮dQ/T = 0, we can prove ∮dW/T = 0 and ∮d/T = 0. If ∮dQ/T = 0, ∮dW/T = 0 and ∮dE/T = 0 are thought to define new system state variables, such definitions would be absurd. The fundamental error of entropy is that in any reversible process, the polytropic process function Q is not a single-valued function of T, in thermodynamics, the P-V diagram should be P-V-T diagram, and the key step of Σ[(ΔQ)/T)] to ∫dQ/T doesn’t hold. Similarly, ∮dQ/T = 0, ∮dW/T = 0 and ∮dE/T = 0 do not hold, either. Since the absolute entropy of Boltzmann is used to explain Clausius entropy and the unit (J/K) of the former is transformed from the latter, the non-existence of Clausius entropy simultaneously denies Boltzmann entropy.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833332.v2
title: Gaussian Job Archive for C15H18ClNO3

description: Archive of work produced using the resources of the Imperial College High Performance Computing Service.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833338.v3
title: A checklist of the freshwater macroinvertebrates of Belize

description: An evolving checklist of macroinvertebrate records made for freshwaters in Belize, Central America
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833332.v1
title: Gaussian Job Archive for C15H18ClNO3

description: Archive of work produced using the resources of the Imperial College High Performance Computing Service.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833851.v5
title: Traces used in the PMBS 13 publication on SMPI

description: These are the tau traces of the NASPB. They were obtained by Georges Markomanolis on the Graphene cluster. Some of the files were too large to be uploaded on figshare so I had to split them. This fileset also comprises the org source of the article we submitted to PMBS'13 (http://pmbsworkshop.org/). This org document comprises (hopefully) all the scripts we used to conduct our analysis and generate the plots. There is also a pdf, which is a preprint of the article we submitted.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833327
title: 熵：一个不是物理量的概念

description: 论文《熵：一个不是物理量的概念》的英文版《Entropy : A concept that is not a physical quantity》已发表在国际期刊Physics Essays [物理文集] [2012年（总25卷）第2期] 上。 英文版（原文）下载网址： http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=543672 熵：一个不是物理量的概念 张 树 风 中南大学物理学院 Email: uhsgnahz@126.com 摘 要 论证了“熵”不是物理量，即，不存在所谓的“熵”这个物理量。 当定义热机效率为:η= W/ W1 ,令元可逆循环为TV循环（即斯特令（stirling）循环），如果 ∮dQ/T =0 成立，我们可以证明 ∮dW/T =0,∮dE/T =0 同样成立。 如果认为∮dQ/T=0, ∮dW/T=0 和∮dE/T=0 定义了新的系统状态量，就显示出这样的定义应该是荒谬的。 “熵”的根本错误在于，任意可逆过程中多方过程函数Q不是T的单值函数，P-V图应该是P-V-T图，∑[(ΔQ)/T)] 写为∫dQ/T这关键一步是不成立的，即，∮dQ/T=0不成立。同样，∮dW/T=0 和 ∮dE/T=0 也都不成立。 由于玻尔兹曼所的绝对“熵”是用来解释克劳修斯“熵”的，玻尔兹曼“熵”的单位（J/K）也是从克劳修斯“熵”移植来的，克劳修斯“熵”不存在也就同时否定了玻尔兹曼“熵”。 关键词：熵、热力学、统计物理学
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833328
title: Entropy: A concept that is not a physical quantity

description: PHYSICS ESSAYS ( Volume 25, Issue 2 (June 2012) ) P172~176 URL: http://physicsessays.org/toc/phes/25/2 Entropy: A concept that is not a physical quantity Shufeng-zhang College of Physics, Central South University, 932 Lushan south Road, Changsha 410083, China E-mail: uhsgnahz@126.com Abstract : This study has demonstrated that entropy is not a physical quantity, that is, the physical quantity called entropy does not exist. If the efficiency of heat engine is defined as η = W/W1, and the reversible cycle is considered to be the Stirling cycle, then, given ∮dQ/T = 0, we can prove ∮dW/T = 0 and ∮d/T = 0. If ∮dQ/T = 0, ∮dW/T = 0 and ∮dE/T = 0 are thought to define new system state variables, such definitions would be absurd. The fundamental error of entropy is that in any reversible process, the polytropic process function Q is not a single-valued function of T, in thermodynamics, the P-V diagram should be P-V-T diagram, and the key step of Σ[(ΔQ)/T)] to ∫dQ/T doesn’t hold. Similarly, ∮dQ/T = 0, ∮dW/T = 0 and ∮dE/T = 0 do not hold, either. Since the absolute entropy of Boltzmann is used to explain Clausius entropy and the unit (J/K) of the former is transformed from the latter, the non-existence of Clausius entropy simultaneously denies Boltzmann entropy.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833329.v1
title: Entropy: A concept that is not a physical quantity

description: PHYSICS ESSAYS ( Volume 25, Issue 2 (June 2012) ) P172~176 URL: http://physicsessays.org/toc/phes/25/2 Entropy: A concept that is not a physical quantity Shufeng-zhang College of Physics, Central South University, 932 Lushan south Road, Changsha 410083, China E-mail: uhsgnahz@126.com Abstract : This study has demonstrated that entropy is not a physical quantity, that is, the physical quantity called entropy does not exist. If the efficiency of heat engine is defined as η = W/W1, and the reversible cycle is considered to be the Stirling cycle, then, given ∮dQ/T = 0, we can prove ∮dW/T = 0 and ∮d/T = 0. If ∮dQ/T = 0, ∮dW/T = 0 and ∮dE/T = 0 are thought to define new system state variables, such definitions would be absurd. The fundamental error of entropy is that in any reversible process, the polytropic process function Q is not a single-valued function of T, in thermodynamics, the P-V diagram should be P-V-T diagram, and the key step of Σ[(ΔQ)/T)] to ∫dQ/T doesn’t hold. Similarly, ∮dQ/T = 0, ∮dW/T = 0 and ∮dE/T = 0 do not hold, either. Since the absolute entropy of Boltzmann is used to explain Clausius entropy and the unit (J/K) of the former is transformed from the latter, the non-existence of Clausius entropy simultaneously denies Boltzmann entropy.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833326
title: 熵：一个不是物理量的概念

description: 论文《熵：一个不是物理量的概念》的英文版《Entropy : A concept that is not a physical quantity》已发表在国际期刊Physics Essays [物理文集] [2012年（总25卷）第2期] 上。 英文版（原文）下载网址： http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=543672 熵：一个不是物理量的概念 张 树 风 中南大学物理学院 Email: uhsgnahz@126.com 摘 要 论证了“熵”不是物理量，即，不存在所谓的“熵”这个物理量。 当定义热机效率为:η= W/ W1 ,令元可逆循环为TV循环（即斯特令（stirling）循环），如果 ∮dQ/T =0 成立，我们可以证明 ∮dW/T =0,∮dE/T =0 同样成立。 如果认为∮dQ/T=0, ∮dW/T=0 和∮dE/T=0 定义了新的系统状态量，就显示出这样的定义应该是荒谬的。 “熵”的根本错误在于，任意可逆过程中多方过程函数Q不是T的单值函数，P-V图应该是P-V-T图，∑[(ΔQ)/T)] 写为∫dQ/T这关键一步是不成立的，即，∮dQ/T=0不成立。同样，∮dW/T=0 和 ∮dE/T=0 也都不成立。 由于玻尔兹曼所的绝对“熵”是用来解释克劳修斯“熵”的，玻尔兹曼“熵”的单位（J/K）也是从克劳修斯“熵”移植来的，克劳修斯“熵”不存在也就同时否定了玻尔兹曼“熵”。 关键词：熵、热力学、统计物理学
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833326.v1
title: 熵：一个不是物理量的概念

description: 论文《熵：一个不是物理量的概念》的英文版《Entropy : A concept that is not a physical quantity》已发表在国际期刊Physics Essays [物理文集] [2012年（总25卷）第2期] 上。 英文版（原文）下载网址： http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=543672 熵：一个不是物理量的概念 张 树 风 中南大学物理学院 Email: uhsgnahz@126.com 摘 要 论证了“熵”不是物理量，即，不存在所谓的“熵”这个物理量。 当定义热机效率为:η= W/ W1 ,令元可逆循环为TV循环（即斯特令（stirling）循环），如果 ∮dQ/T =0 成立，我们可以证明 ∮dW/T =0,∮dE/T =0 同样成立。 如果认为∮dQ/T=0, ∮dW/T=0 和∮dE/T=0 定义了新的系统状态量，就显示出这样的定义应该是荒谬的。 “熵”的根本错误在于，任意可逆过程中多方过程函数Q不是T的单值函数，P-V图应该是P-V-T图，∑[(ΔQ)/T)] 写为∫dQ/T这关键一步是不成立的，即，∮dQ/T=0不成立。同样，∮dW/T=0 和 ∮dE/T=0 也都不成立。 由于玻尔兹曼所的绝对“熵”是用来解释克劳修斯“熵”的，玻尔兹曼“熵”的单位（J/K）也是从克劳修斯“熵”移植来的，克劳修斯“熵”不存在也就同时否定了玻尔兹曼“熵”。 关键词：熵、热力学、统计物理学
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833325
title: Entropy: A concept that is not a physical quantity

description: PHYSICS ESSAYS ( Volume 25, Issue 2 (June 2012) ) P172~176 URL: http://physicsessays.org/toc/phes/25/2 Entropy: A concept that is not a physical quantity Shufeng-zhang College of Physics, Central South University, 932 Lushan south Road, Changsha 410083, China E-mail: uhsgnahz@126.com Abstract : This study has demonstrated that entropy is not a physical quantity, that is, the physical quantity called entropy does not exist. If the efficiency of heat engine is defined as η = W/W1, and the reversible cycle is considered to be the Stirling cycle, then, given ∮dQ/T = 0, we can prove ∮dW/T = 0 and ∮d/T = 0. If ∮dQ/T = 0, ∮dW/T = 0 and ∮dE/T = 0 are thought to define new system state variables, such definitions would be absurd. The fundamental error of entropy is that in any reversible process, the polytropic process function Q is not a single-valued function of T, in thermodynamics, the P-V diagram should be P-V-T diagram, and the key step of Σ[(ΔQ)/T)] to ∫dQ/T doesn’t hold. Similarly, ∮dQ/T = 0, ∮dW/T = 0 and ∮dE/T = 0 do not hold, either. Since the absolute entropy of Boltzmann is used to explain Clausius entropy and the unit (J/K) of the former is transformed from the latter, the non-existence of Clausius entropy simultaneously denies Boltzmann entropy.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833328.v1
title: Entropy: A concept that is not a physical quantity

description: PHYSICS ESSAYS ( Volume 25, Issue 2 (June 2012) ) P172~176 URL: http://physicsessays.org/toc/phes/25/2 Entropy: A concept that is not a physical quantity Shufeng-zhang College of Physics, Central South University, 932 Lushan south Road, Changsha 410083, China E-mail: uhsgnahz@126.com Abstract : This study has demonstrated that entropy is not a physical quantity, that is, the physical quantity called entropy does not exist. If the efficiency of heat engine is defined as η = W/W1, and the reversible cycle is considered to be the Stirling cycle, then, given ∮dQ/T = 0, we can prove ∮dW/T = 0 and ∮d/T = 0. If ∮dQ/T = 0, ∮dW/T = 0 and ∮dE/T = 0 are thought to define new system state variables, such definitions would be absurd. The fundamental error of entropy is that in any reversible process, the polytropic process function Q is not a single-valued function of T, in thermodynamics, the P-V diagram should be P-V-T diagram, and the key step of Σ[(ΔQ)/T)] to ∫dQ/T doesn’t hold. Similarly, ∮dQ/T = 0, ∮dW/T = 0 and ∮dE/T = 0 do not hold, either. Since the absolute entropy of Boltzmann is used to explain Clausius entropy and the unit (J/K) of the former is transformed from the latter, the non-existence of Clausius entropy simultaneously denies Boltzmann entropy.
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833338.v4
title: A checklist of the freshwater macroinvertebrates of Belize

description: An evolving checklist of macroinvertebrate records made for freshwaters in Belize, Central America
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.833851.v6
title: Companion of the PMBS'13 publication on SMPI

description: These are the tau traces of the NASPB. They were obtained by Georges Markomanolis on the Graphene cluster. Some of the files were too large to be uploaded on figshare so I had to split them. This fileset also comprises the org source of the article we submitted to PMBS'13 (http://pmbsworkshop.org/). This org document comprises (hopefully) all the scripts we used to conduct our analysis and generate the plots. There is also a pdf, which is a preprint of the article we submitted.