cometadata/datacite-titles-descriptions-related-identifiers huggingface dataset:
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-7873-1
title: Taking Part: the National Survey of Culture, Leisure and Sport, 2014-2015; Adult and Child Data: Special Licence Access
title: Taking Part: the National Survey of Culture, Leisure and Sport, 2005/06- : Special Licence Access
title: Taking Part Year 10

description: The &lt;i&gt;Taking Part&lt;/i&gt; survey collects data on many aspects of leisure, culture and sport in England, as well as an in-depth range of socio-demographic information on respondents. The survey is commissioned by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) in partnership with three of its non-departmental public bodies (Sport England, Arts Council England and English Heritage). The survey was first commissioned in 2005 as a face-to-face household survey of adults (16+) in England. Since then it has run annually and has also been developed to include further elements, including a child element and a longitudinal element.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Further information can be found on the gov.uk &lt;a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/taking-part" target="_blank" title="Taking Part"&gt;Taking Part&lt;/a&gt; web pages.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
 Main topics covered by the survey include: the arts, museums and galleries, libraries, archives, heritage, sport, World War I, the Olympics, volunteering, charitable giving and demographics. These topics appear in the main adult and child datasets, and in the adult longitudinal dataset. The Child Boost dataset only contains questions on sports participation. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This study is subject to restrictive Special Licence (SL) access conditions as it contains additional detailed geographic variables (Local Authorities; ACORN Group; ACORN Category; ONS Urban Rural Classification). The End User Licence (EUL) version which is the same, but excludes these detailed variables, is available from the UK Data Service under SN 7872. Users are advised to first obtain the standard EUL version of the data to see if they are sufficient for their research requirements. The SL data have more restrictive access conditions; prospective users of the SL version will need to complete an extra application form and demonstrate to the data owners exactly why they need access to the additional variables in order to get permission to use that version.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/g5jd93
title: msXL_323r_31_13.jpg
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/omjm6b
title: msXL_323r_15_12.jpg
DOI: 10.15468/dl.tw35y6
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 288 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "and" : [
 "Geometry POLYGON((-102.299 21.907,-102.279 21.907,-102.279 21.926,-102.299 21.926,-102.299 21.907))",
 "OccurrenceStatus is Present"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 288 records from 12 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0031256-250920141307145/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/ezlj2t
title: msXL_323r_15_11.jpg
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/acwtxt
title: msXL_323r_15_10.jpg
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/kwmqoh
title: msXL_323r_15_09.jpg
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/vc9uz0
title: msXL_323r_15_08.jpg
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/a21jyy
title: msXL_323r_15_07.jpg
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/eadahf
title: msXL_323r_15_06.jpg
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/fzhifn
title: msXL_323r_15_05.jpg
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/zk6znp
title: msXL_323r_15_04.jpg
DOI: 10.15468/dl.rsujs5
title: Occurrence Download

description: A dataset containing 1042 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query:
{
 "DatasetKey" : [
 "is Vertebrados terrestres de San Juan de Camarones, Durango"
 ]
}

 The dataset includes 1042 records from 1 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0031257-250920141307145/datasets/export for details.
 
Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/ukitky
title: msXL_323r_15_03.jpg
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/duztqw
title: msXL_323r_15_02.jpg
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/5hjb3z
title: msXL_323r_15_01.jpg
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/lttvna
title: msXL_323r_0_ring.jpg
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/gazpmw
title: msXL_323r.jpg
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/tg56si
title: msXL_322v_65_43.tif
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/y0w9wd
title: msXL_322v_65_42.tif
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/c44duo
title: msXL_322v_65_41.tif
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-7875-1
title: Long-Term Trajectories of Crime in the United Kingdom, 1982-2013

description: The project for which this data was collated sought to explore the ways in which changes in economic and social policies resulted in changes in patterns of crime, victimisation and anxieties about crime and how shifts in social values affected national-level experiences and beliefs about crime and appropriate responses to it (such as support for punitive punishments like the death penalty). The researchers explored the long-term consequences of almost two decades (1979-1997) of neo-conservative and neo-liberal social and economic policies for the UK’s criminal justice system and the general experience of crime amongst its citizens. Using the Thatcher and Major governments (1979-1997) as the case study, the research team explored the experiences of crime, victimisation and fear of crime at the national and regional levels, and for key socio-demographic groups, since the 1970s (and where possible earlier than this). In order to complete these analyses repeated cross-sectional surveys of citizens in the UK were collated in such a way that the data could be analysed using techniques associated with time series and age-period-cohort analyses (as well as more conventional techniques). The surveys collated were the British Crime Survey (now called the Crime Survey for England and Wales), the British Social Attitudes Survey and the British Election Study. These survey series are also available from the UK Data Service.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/rpt2cy
title: msXL_322v_65_40.tif
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-7878-1
title: United Kingdom Omnibus: Poverty and Social Exclusion Module, 2012
title: Poverty and Social Exclusion in the United Kingdom, 2010-2012
title: PSE12

description: The Poverty and Social Exclusion in the United Kingdom project is the largest research project of its kind ever carried out in the UK. It examines levels of deprivation in the UK today. The research aims to answer the following questions:&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;What are the best methods for measuring poverty, deprivation, social exclusion and standard of living?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;How are the different dimensions of poverty, deprivation and social exclusion related?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;What is the current extent and nature of poverty and how has it changed?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;What policies best address these problems?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;Launched in May 2010, the project comprises four main pieces of research so far:&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Firstly, two major surveys into the public's perceptions of necessities and into living standards were carried out in 2012/13: an attitudinal UK Omnibus survey, gathering the public's perceptions of necessities and attitudes to services (held under SN 7878); and a large-scale survey of living standards to examine the nature, extent and causes of deprivation and social exclusion (SN 7879).&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;In addition, two qualitative research studies have been undertaken: an investigation into the experiences of living on low income during recession in Gloucestershire, the West Midlands and Strathclyde (SN 7877); and an exploration of the role of the family when coping with poverty in Northern Ireland.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;Further information about the project may be found on the &lt;a href="http://www.poverty.ac.uk/" title="Poverty and Social Exclusion"&gt;Poverty and Social Exclusion&lt;/a&gt; project website.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-7879-1
title: Poverty and Social Exclusion Living Standards Survey, 2012
title: Poverty and Social Exclusion in the United Kingdom, 2010-2012
title: PSE12

description: The Poverty and Social Exclusion in the United Kingdom project is the largest research project of its kind ever carried out in the UK. It examines levels of deprivation in the UK today. The research aims to answer the following questions:&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;What are the best methods for measuring poverty, deprivation, social exclusion and standard of living?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;How are the different dimensions of poverty, deprivation and social exclusion related?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;What is the current extent and nature of poverty and how has it changed?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;What policies best address these problems?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;Launched in May 2010, the project comprises four main pieces of research so far:&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Firstly, two major surveys into the public's perceptions of necessities and into living standards were carried out in 2012/13: an attitudinal UK Omnibus survey, gathering the public's perceptions of necessities and attitudes to services (held under SN 7878); and a large-scale survey of living standards to examine the nature, extent and causes of deprivation and social exclusion (SN 7879).&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;In addition, two qualitative research studies have been undertaken: an investigation into the experiences of living on low income during recession in Gloucestershire, the West Midlands and Strathclyde (SN 7877); and an exploration of the role of the family when coping with poverty in Northern Ireland.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;Further information about the project may be found on the &lt;a href="http://www.poverty.ac.uk/" title="Poverty and Social Exclusion"&gt;Poverty and Social Exclusion&lt;/a&gt; project website.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/3nn0pe
title: msXL_322v_65_39.tif
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-7881-2
title: European Health Interview Survey: United Kingdom Data, Wave 2 and 3, 2013-2020
title: EHIS

description: &lt;p&gt;The &lt;i&gt;European Health Interview Survey&lt;/i&gt; (EHIS) is a major European Union reference source for comparative statistics on health status, health determinants and use of health care services. It was planned that EHIS would be conducted once every five years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The first wave of EHIS was launched under an informal agreement and implemented in 17 EU Member States and in Switzerland and Turkey between 2006 and 2009. The second wave of EHIS was completed under a European Parliament and Council regulation in all 28 EU Member States, Iceland, Norway and Turkey between 2013 and 2015. The third wave of EHIS took place in 2019 and 2020 and was completed by all member sates in accordance with the European Parliament and Council regulation. The UK was required to complete EHIS Wave 3 as the UK was a member state in 2019.  &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Users should note that the United Kingdom opted out of the first wave and did not take part, so UK EHIS data exists only from Wave 2 and Wave 3. This dataset contains only the UK responses.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: 700;"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Further information about the survey may be found on the European Commission &lt;a href="http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/microdata/european-health-interview-survey" title="European Health Interview Survey" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"&gt; European Health Interview Survey&lt;/a&gt; webpage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Latest edition information&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the second edition (March 2022), data and documentation for Wave 3 were added to the study.&lt;/p&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-7882-3
title: Quarterly Acquisitions and Disposals of Capital Assets Survey, 2015-2020: Secure Access
title: QCAS

description: The &lt;i&gt;Quarterly Acquisitions and Disposals of Capital Assets Survey (QCAS)&lt;/i&gt; is the new name for a more detailed &lt;i&gt;Quarterly Survey of Capital Expenditure&lt;/i&gt; (available from the UK Data Archive under Secure Access conditions from SN 6708 (1998-2014). From quarter one 2015, this new survey will collect the value of capital assets bought and sold, which is important information for the UK National Accounts. It is a statutory survey with a stratified random sample of approximately 27,000 businesses selected from the Inter-Departmental Business Register, where the strata are defined by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) 2007 and employment size of the business.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; Results from the survey provide essential information for the UK National Accounts and feed into the compilation of Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF). GFCF is a major component of the expenditure measure of UK Gross Domestic Product (GDP), which shows the total economic activity taking place in the country. It is used to monitor the UK's financial health and prosperity over time and in comparison to other countries.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; The main reasons for the changes to the survey are to move to the updated European System of Accounts (ESA) 2010 manual, the international guidance for national accounts. Several presentational issues have been addressed but the main changes to the survey are:&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;new questions have been added (increase from 11 to around 30) to improve the quality of estimates and to meet the latest European legislation requirements (ESA 2010) &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;the lower limit of £500 for the value of reported assets has been removed, so all relevant assets (even those below businesses’ Asset Register threshold) should be reported &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;small tools used in production have been included within the definition of GFCF&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;improvements have been made to the questionnaire’s layout with new sections and headings, designed to make completing the questionnaire easier &lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;The data from the new questions will not be included in estimates of GFCF and its components until 2017, when 2 years of data will be available for quality assurance.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;i&gt;Linking to other business studies&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt; These data contain Inter-Departmental Business Register reference numbers. These are anonymous but unique reference numbers assigned to business organisations. Their inclusion allows researchers to combine different business survey sources together. Researchers may consider applying for other business data to assist their research.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; For the third edition (April 2020), data for quarter 2, 2016 to quarter 1, 2020 have been added, along with a data dictionary covering the same time period.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-7883-1
title: Energy Follow Up Survey, 2011: Lookup File: Secure Access
title: EFUS 2011

description: The &lt;i&gt;Energy Follow Up Survey, 2011: Lookup File: Secure Access&lt;/i&gt; contains various ID variables which enables the &lt;i&gt;Energy Follow Up Survey, 2011&lt;/i&gt; (EFUS 2011) (available from the UK Data Archive under SN 7471) to be linked to &lt;i&gt;English Housing Survey&lt;/i&gt; data.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-7884-1
title: Public Attitudes to Price Fixing in Britain, 2007

description: This dataset contains the results of a survey gauging public attitudes in Britain to price-fixing and cartel enforcement mechanisms. This was the first ever survey of consumer attitudes to cartels. To ensure balanced and unbiased results, respondents were mainly presented with various scenarios and were asked to either agree or strongly agree with one of two balanced alternatives. They also had the option to agree with neither, or select "don't know". The survey asked respondents about their shopping preferences, about their attitudes towards price-fixing, and their attitudes towards punishment for individuals and firms engaged in such practices, also controlling for the size and type of business. The results indicate that the majority of Britons (73%) recognise the harmful effects of price-fixing. They understand that colluding competitors will set prices so as to maximise their collective profits to the detriment of their customers. They also recognise the need for such behaviour to be punished, and do not feel that crisis cartels for the protection of employment or small businesses should be exempt.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; A later international survey conducted by the same centre, &lt;I&gt;Public Attitudes to Price Fixing and Cartel Enforcement in Britain, Germany, Italy and the United States, 2014&lt;/I&gt;, is available under SN 7885.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-7885-1
title: Public Attitudes to Price Fixing and Cartel Enforcement in Britain, Germany, Italy and the United States, 2014

description: The dataset contains the results of a survey gauging public attitudes to price-fixing and cartel enforcement mechanisms. It was carried out in Britain, Germany, Italy and the United States. This research builds on a 2007 survey by the same author (&lt;I&gt;Public Attitudes to Price Fixing in Britain, 2007&lt;/I&gt;, held under SN 7884), which was the first ever survey of GB consumer attitudes to cartels. To ensure balanced and unbiased results, respondents were mainly presented with various scenarios and were asked to either agree or strongly agree with one of two balanced alternatives. They also had the option to agree with neither, or select "don't know". The survey asked respondents about their attitudes towards price-fixing and their preferences in relation to punishment, leniency and other relevant enforcement tools. The conclusions are likely to find similar attitudes and preferences between consumers in each of the four jurisdictions, despite significant differences in culture, legal tradition and levels of enforcement. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.25346/s6eecgix/kpewqv
title: msXL_322v_65_38.tif
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-7887-1
title: Maternity Survey, 2015
title: National Health Service Patient Survey Programme, 2003-
title: NHS Patient Survey Programme

description: &lt;p&gt;The National Patient Survey Programme is one of the largest patient survey programmes in the world. It provides an opportunity to monitor experiences of health and provides data to assist with registration of trusts and monitoring on-going compliance. Understanding what people think about the care and treatment they receive is crucial to improving the quality of care being delivered by healthcare organisations. One way of doing this is by asking people who have recently used the health service to tell the Care Quality Commission (CQC) about their experiences.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;The CQC will use the results from the surveys in the regulation, monitoring and inspection of NHS acute trusts (or, for community mental health service user surveys, providers of mental health services) in England. Data are used in CQC Insight, an intelligence tool which identifies potential changes in quality of care and then supports deciding on the right regulatory response. Survey data will also be used to support CQC inspections.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Each survey has a different focus. These include patients' experiences in outpatient and accident and emergency departments in Acute Trusts, and the experiences of people using mental health services in the community.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;History of the programme&lt;br&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The National Patient Survey Programme began in 2002, and was then conducted by the Commission for Health Improvement (CHI), along with the Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection (CHAI). Administration of the programme was taken over by the Healthcare Commission in time for the 2004 series. On 1 April 2009, the CQC was formed, which replaced the Healthcare Commission.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Further information about the National Patient Survey Programme may be found on the CQC &lt;a href="http://www.cqc.org.uk/content/surveys" title="Patient Survey Programme" ,="" target="_blank"&gt;Patient Survey Programme&lt;/a&gt; web pages.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt; The &lt;i&gt;Maternity Survey, 2015&lt;/i&gt; looked at all three stages of the maternity pathway and covered care provided before birth (antenatal), during labour and birth, and in the first few weeks after birth (postnatal). The questions related to women’s access to care, communication with staff, involvement in decision-making and continuity of care, among other key themes. Particular attention is given to midwife intervention, choice, type of birth and emotional wellbeing. These factors were identified as being important to the women taking part in the survey, but are also embedded in recent policy concerning maternity care.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
DOI: 10.5255/ukda-sn-7888-1
title: Household Survey for Evaluation of Indonesia Women's Empowerment Project, 2013
title: Effectiveness Review

description: The &lt;i&gt;Household Survey for Evaluation of Indonesia Women's Empowerment Project, 2013&lt;/i&gt; was collected by Oxfam to evaluate the Papua Women's Empowerment (PAWE) project. The overall objective of the project was to improve women's awareness and participation in the decision-making and implementation of a large-scale national community-driven development (CDD) programme called PNPM Mandiri/RESPEK. This is the National Programme for Community Empowerment (PNPM) Mandiri-Strategic Village Development Plan. This was to be achieved by a combination of a grant programme and the training of 50 local facilitators ('cadre members') whose mandate was to provide gender training to beneficiary women's groups and local government officials. The grant programme provided funding to women's groups to organise women’s capacity building activities (e.g. training on business economic planning, proposal writing, financial record keeping, vocational skills, and gender issues, etc.). In addition to this, the project also provided support to women's groups in designing project proposals and running group activities. This project was funded by the Japan Social Development Fund (JSDF), supervised by the World Bank and implemented by Oxfam in six districts in Papua Province and four districts in West Papua Province, between May 2009 and April 2013. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The Effectiveness Review used a quasi-experimental evaluation design to assess the impact of the project activities approximately four years after the implementation started. It involved carrying out household surveys of a random sample of 175 members in 23 PAWE beneficiary women's groups. These groups were randomly selected from among all the 39 groups supported by Oxfam in Jayapura, Merauke and Biak-Numfor district. In addition, a random sample of 271 women from 23 women’s groups in neighbouring villages were interviewed and included in the study to serve as a comparison group.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;