Archaeotetraodon bemisae Bannikov & Tyler 2024, sp. nov.
Creators: name: Bannikov, Alexandre F.
name: Tyler, James C.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2024
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Tetraodontiformes
Tetraodontidae
Archaeotetraodon
Archaeotetraodon bemisae

description: † Archaeotetraodon bemisae sp. nov.
Figures 1–5
Holotype. PIN 5917/1, a single, relatively well preserved, nearly complete, articulated skeleton with incomplete counterpart; SL 50 mm (Figs. 1–4).
Paratype. PIN 5917/2, a relatively poorly preserved, nearly complete, articulated skeleton with fragment of counterpart; SL 24.5 mm (Fig. 5).
Horizon and locality. Left bank of the Pshekha River, upstream of Shirvanskaya settlement, and just downstream from the local bridge (Krasnodar Region, SW Russia; 44.367936 N, 39.795570 E); uppermost part of the Maikop Group (correlated with the basal Langhian), basal-most Middle Miocene (not less than 15 mya; Popov et al. 2022, 2023).
Diagnosis. An † Archaeotetraodon species defined by the following combination of characters: frontal width relatively broad over the orbit; 18 vertebrae, of which eight are abdominal; ventral postcleithrum slender; rayless pterygiophore moderately long; height/length ratio of the posteriormost abdominal centrum 0.78–0.79; pectoral fin with 14 rays; dorsal fin with 10 rays; anal fin with 9 rays; scales on most of the body with smooth bifid spinules, whereas posteriorly at least many of the scales have single undivided spinules; bifid spinules pointed, thick, and sturdy.
Description. In both specimens, the body is preserved in lateral view, whereas the neurocranium is in dorsal view in the part but is in ventral view in the counterpart. The body is moderately elongated, with a large and wide head. The dorsal- and anal-fin bases are moderately long and almost opposite each other (Figs. 1 and 5).
The neurocranium is poorly preserved, with very few details recognizable. It is wider at the level of the sphenotics than at the level of the pterotics. Although most of the bony substance of the frontals is missing, it is evident that the frontal width is relatively broad over the orbit, about half the length of the neurocranium (without ethmoids). The limits of the bones of the neurocranium and ethmoid region are unclear. The size of the orbit is not evident; no sclerotic ossifications are present. The parasphenoid is robust, long, and thickened anteriorly in dorsal view.
The upper- and lower-jaw bones are only partially preserved (Fig. 2). The beak-like premaxilla has an almost straight biting edge. The smooth inner surface of the left premaxilla is exposed in the holotype and reveals two large, elongate trituration teeth and the sockets of three additional, smaller teeth; teeth are set in a longitudinal row just lateral to the premaxillary medial edge. Two large, elongate trituration teeth are also evident in the paratype, although the jaw region is less well preserved than in the holotype. The medial edge of the premaxilla is thick and has prominent interdigitations for articulation with the opposite premaxilla. The maxillae are too incompletely preserved to be described. The right mandible of the holotype is exposed in lateral view; the dentary has a smooth and sturdy beak-like anterodorsal portion. The posteroventral portion of the lower jaw is relatively poorly preserved; however, what we interpret to be the detached angulo-articular is present just anterior to the beak formed by the upper and lower jaws. The angulo-articular is ovoid in shape and thin, except for the thickened oval articular condyle located posteriorly.
The bones of the suspensorium, opercular series, and hyoid apparatus are incompletely preserved and not easily recognizable. The quadrate is relatively narrow, triangular, with a distinct articular condyle. The preopercle is long and strongly inclined anteriorly, with a somewhat concave and thickened dorsal margin. Its width is not evident, but it seems to be rather narrow. Only the anterior margin of the opercle is recognizable; it is long, inclined posteriorly, significantly thickened, and terminates dorsally with a concave articular facet. The hyoid bar is not clear; some saber-like branchiostegal rays are partly recognizable (including the enlarged flattened ray characteristic for puffers), but their precise number cannot be determined.
The vertebral column is very slightly concave dorso-ventrally and consists of 18 (8+10) vertebrae. The vertebral centra are somewhat elongate, rectangular, and longer than high. The length of the abdominal portion of the holotypic vertebral column is 1.4 times shorter than its caudal portion. The first three vertebrae possess relatively broad, rather high, and presumably bifid neural spines. The neural spine of the fourth vertebra is broad, presumably bifid anteriorly, and extends postero-dorsally to a tapering confluent spine. The subsequent neural spines are definitely single and posteriorly inclined; these are broad but very gradually become slender to the 13 th vertebra, whose neural spine is the thinnest. The neural spines of the 14 th to 17 th vertebrae are shorter but broader distally. The haemal spines of the caudal vertebrae supporting the anal-fin pterygiophores are extremely short. These spines posterior to the anal-fin base are shorter than their corresponding neural spines and appear to become increasingly broad.
The caudal skeleton is relatively poorly preserved; it has the typical tetraodontid morphology of consolidated hypurals, with the hypaxial plate fused to the terminal centrum and the epaxial hypurals forming an autogenous triangular plate. The parhypural is evidently autogenous; the epural is not recognizable in the holotype, but it is indistinctly visible in the paratype. It is unclear if the haemal spine of the penultimate vertebra is fused to the centrum. The caudal fin is elongate; it consists of eight branched rays and two or three unbranched rays (one ray above and one or two below).
The eight dorsal-fin pterygiophores are located between the neural spines of the seventh to 12 th vertebrae; the first pterygiophore seems to be the longest and the second the broadest. The first dorsal-fin pterygiophore forms an anterior prong to which a moderately long (corresponding to the length of two opposite vertebrae) and slender rayless pterygiophore articulates. The dorsal fin originates above the 11 th or 12 th vertebra. The dorsal fin is moderately long; it consists of 10 soft, segmented, and branched rays. The bases of the dorsal-fin rays form a spiky head (Fig. 3A).
The anal fin originates below the dorsal-fin origin or slightly behind it. There are six anal-fin pterygiophores; the first pterygiophore is especially long, thick, and very strongly inclined. The subsequent anal-fin pterygiophores rapidly decrease in length posteriorly in the series (Fig. 3B). The anal fin is moderately long; it consists of nine soft, segmented, and branched rays. The posterior anal-fin rays are shifted forward post-mortem in the holotype (Fig. 3B). The bases of the anal-fin rays are similar to those of the dorsal-fin rays, and they also form a spiky head.
Among the pectoral girdle bones, the cleithrum, coracoid, and scapula are difficult to recognize (best indicated in the holotypic counterpart). The supracleithrum is elongate and narrow anteriorly where it forms the rounded condyle for articulation with the pterotic. The postcleithrum forms a long, narrow, somewhat curved bar; the ventral and dorsal postcleithra of the holotype are disarticulated post-mortem. Greatest width of the ventral postcleithrum is about 20 times in length. The pectoral radials are rather large; the second and third radials are constricted in the middle, creating an hourglass shape. The fourth radial is concave on the side toward the third radial. The first pectoral radial is reduced to a wedge between the distal regions of the scapula and the second radial. The pectoral fin consists of 14 rays, which are preserved only basally in both specimens. The base of the pectoral fin is relatively wide and sub-vertically oriented.
The entire body is covered with small spinulose scales. Most of these scales have a stellate basal plate from which arise rather thick and sturdy spinules that are bifurcate from the base and divergent distally (Fig. 4). The width of the basal region of the scale at the level of the bottom of its bifurcation is 2.7 to 3 times into the length of the scale spine from this same basal region to the distal end of the scale spine. Many of the scales located posteriorly on the body have single rather than bifid spinules.
Measurements. Measurements are given as percent SL, with the value for the holotype given first followed by that of the paratype in parentheses. Anal-fin-base length: 5.3 (5.4); anal-fin height: ca. 13.5 (9); bifid spinule length from point of bifurcation: 0.4 (?); bifid spinule width at the base: 0.1 (?); body depth: ca. 30 (ca. 30); caudal-fin length: 21 (?); caudal peduncle depth: 6 (6); distance between pectoral and anal fins: 32 (30); dorsal-fin-base length: 6 (5.8); dorsal-fin height: ca. 15.5 (ca. 10.5); first anal-fin pterygiophore length: 12.7 (11.4); head length (premaxilla to posterior end of basioccipital): 38 (46); long trituration teeth length: ca. 2 (?); neurocranium width between sphenotics: ca.18.8 (?); opercle, anterior margin length: ca. 12 (?); predorsal distance: 74 (74.5); preopercle length: ca. 22 (?); supracleithrum length: ca. 9.8 (?); ventral postcleithrum length: ca. 23.6 (ca. 17); ventral postcleithrum width: 1.0 (ca. 0.7); vertebral centra (middle vertebrae) length: 3.8 (ca. 3).
Etymology. Named in honor of Katherine E. Bemis of the National Systematics Laboratory, National Marine Fisheries Service, located at the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., U.S.A., in recognition of her excellent studies of tetraodontiform fishes and of her extensive field work to collect specimens of them.
description: Published as part of Bannikov, Alexandre F. & Tyler, James C., 2024, A new species of the fossil pufferfish genus † Archaeotetraodon (Tetraodontidae) from the Middle Miocene of the North Caucasus, Russia, pp. 145-153 in Zootaxa 5468 (1) on pages 146-151, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5468.1.5, http://zenodo.org/record/11614955