Cultural Resources Survey of Two Tracts, 20.6 Acres, for Sandia National Laboratories Containment Test Technology Facility Expansion, Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico
Creators: name: Hoagland, Steven R.
Publisher: name: Butler Service Group, Inc.
Year: 1991
Subjects: subject: Bernalillo (County)
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/3646/bernalillo-county
subject: Albuquerque, New Mexico
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/84765/albuquerque-new-mexico
subject: Kirtland Air Force Base
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/17943/kirtland-air-force-base
subject: Historic
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/temporal-keyword/5728/historic
subject: Prehistoric
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/temporal-keyword/53/prehistoric
subject: Historic
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/culture-keyword/25/historic
subject: NM I:15:3:12
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/130371/nm-i15312
subject: Building 6920
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/130695/building-6920
subject: Technical Area III
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/130696/technical-area-iii
subject: KAFB Management Area G
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/130694/kafb-management-area-g
subject: Trash Midden
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/351/trash-midden
subject: Mine
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/290/mine
subject: Mine Tunnels
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/291/mine-tunnels
subject: Mine-Related Structures
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/292/mine-related-structures
subject: Foxholes
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/3828/foxholes
subject: Fox Hole
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/4693/fox-hole
subject: Isolated Artifact
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/344/isolated-artifact
subject: Rock Alignment
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/360/rock-alignment
subject: Isolated Feature
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/345/isolated-feature
subject: Cans
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/2133/cans
subject: Lead
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/663/lead
subject: Metal
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/11/metal
subject: Mineral
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/12/mineral
subject: Negative Result
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/other-keyword/76495/negative-result
subject: Containment Test Technology Facility
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/other-keyword/168744/containment-test-technology-facility
subject: CTTF Expansion Project
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/other-keyword/168747/cttf-expansion-project
subject: CTTF
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/other-keyword/168745/cttf
subject: Cultural Resources Clearance
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/other-keyword/168090/cultural-resources-clearance
subject: Expansion Project
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/other-keyword/168746/expansion-project
subject: Reconnaissance / Survey
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/7/reconnaissance-survey

description: An archaeological survey of approximately 20. 6 acres situated within two tracts of land, yielded no significant cultural resources. A small portion of the northeast corner of Tract One (approx. 0.46 acres) was previously surveyed by the Center of Anthropological Studies (Franklin and Neal 1981). No cultural resources were located within Tract One during this previous inventory. The current inventory resulted in the recordation of nine isolated occurrences (IOs), one in Tract One (IO #1) and eight in Tract Two. The observed isolated occurrences and trash are no longer thought to be significant cultural resources, and therefore not eligible for inclusion onto the National Register Historic Places. It is, therefore, the opinion of the author that the isolated occurrences and semi-recent trash are not or are no longer potentially significant. Based on the apparent lack of significant intact archaeological remains, cultural resources clearance is recommended.