Crangonyx islandicus N & Kristjánsson, 2006, sp. nov.
Creators: name: N, Jörundur Svava R S S O
name: Kristjánsson, Bjarni K.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2006
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Crangonyctidae
Crangonyx
Crangonyx islandicus

description: Crangonyx islandicus sp. nov.
(Figs 1–6)
Material examined
Holotype. Female, 6.8 mm, non-ovigerous, brood plates with setae, Vatnsvik, 64°14.46´N, 21°03.19´W, Thingvallavatn, Southwest Iceland, 12 July 2001, groundwater inflow to the lake, 4°C, 30 ppm conductivity, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, IMNH 2164.
Paratypes. Vatnsvik, 64°14.46´N, 21°03.19´W, Thingvallavatn, Southwest Iceland, 8 May 2001, 21 specimens (drawn paratype included), groundwater inflow to the lake, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, IMNH 2165; Vatnsvik, 64°14.46´N, 21°03.19´W, Thingvallavatn, Southwest Iceland, 12 July 2001, 7 specimens, groundwater inflow to the lake, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, IMNH 2166; Nautavakir, 64°00.876´N, 20°53.018´W, Southwest Iceland, 1 August 2003, 6°C, 60 ppm conductivity, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson & J. Svavarsson, 1 specimen, IMNH 2167.
Other material examined
Vatnsvik (64°14.46´N, 21°03.19´W), Thingvallavatn, Southwest Iceland, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson: 5 September 2000, 1 specimens; 6 September 2000, 6 specimens; 25 February 2001, 22 specimens; 31 March 2001, 18 specimens; 7 May 2001, 2 specimens; 21 May 2001, 27 specimens; 12 June 2001, 7 specimens; 25 July 2001, 42 specimens; 6 June 2002 (ethanol preserved), 10 specimens; 30 June 2003, 16 specimens. Skútavík, Thingvallavatn, Southwest Iceland, approximately 64°08.5´N, 21°02.5´W, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, 2 specimens; Nautavakir, Grímsnes, Southwest Iceland, 64°00.876´N, 20°53.018´W, 7 June 2002, from the stomach of arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus; 60.9 mm) fished in groundwater outflow, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, 1 specimen, damaged; Spring at Gunnarsholt, South Iceland, 21 July 2004, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, 1 specimen; Keldur, spring at area 1, South Iceland, 63°49.346´N, 20°04.561´W, 21 July 2004, 2.9°C, 110 ppm conductivity, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, 1 specimen; Lind (spring close to Keldur), South Iceland, 63°49.607´N, 20°05.783´W, 21 July 2004, 3.8°C, 120 ppm conductivity, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, 1 specimen; Rangárbotnar, South Iceland, 22 July 2004, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, 2 specimens; Galtalaekur, South Iceland, 64°00.478´N, 19°55.113´W, 22 July 2004, 5°C, 110 ppm conductivity, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, 6 specimens; Laekjarbotnar, area 1, South Iceland, 63°57.442´N, 20°15.923´W, 23 July 2004, 4.8°C, 70 ppm, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, 1 specimen; Laekjarbotnar, area 2, South Iceland, 63°57.442´N 20°15.923´W, 23 July 2004, 4.8°C, 80 ppm conductivity, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, 79 specimens; Stóri Galtalaekur, South Iceland, 64°00.968´N, 19°57.793´W, 24 July 2004, 6°C, 90 ppm conductivity, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, 1 specimen; Lake Myvatn, Northeast Iceland, groundwater inflow north of Brjánsnes, 3 September 2004, electric fishing, coll. Viktor Burkni Pálsson & Gísli Már Gíslason, 9 specimens; Fljót, Grenlaekur, South Iceland, 63°44.939´N, 17°56.714´N, 6 July 2005, 6.1°C, 70 ppm, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, 15 specimens; Spring no. 1 below Tröllahylur, Grenlaekur, South Iceland, 63°43.902´N, 17°58.144´W, 6 July 2005, 6°C, 80 ppm, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, 14 specimens; Spring no. 2 below Tröllahylur, Grenlaekur, South Iceland, 63°43.876´N, 17°58.064´W, 6 July 2005, 6°C, 60 ppm, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, few specimens; Hrosslaekur, Grenlaekur, South Iceland, 63°43.559´N, 17°59.218´W, 6 July 2005, 5.8°C, 60 ppm, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, few specimens; Spring south of the farm Höfði, Kirkjubaer, South Iceland, 63°46.165´N, 18°04.368´W, 7 July 2005, 6.3°C, 70 ppm, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, 2 specimens; Spring in the land of Hunkubakki, Kirkjubaer, South Iceland, 63°45.705´N, 18°07.484´W, 7 July 2005, 4.8°C, 70 ppm, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, 2 specimens; Spring near Klausturlax, Kirkjubaer, South Iceland, 63°46.906´N, 18°03.013´W, 7 July 2005, 5.9°C, 70 ppm, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, 15 specimens; Springs at Þverá, South Iceland, 63°52.423´N, 17°49.231´W, 9 July 2005, 7.3 and 6.2°C, 40 ppm, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, 1 specimen; Oddar, Húsafell, West Iceland, 64°42.132´N, 20°53.805´W, 27 July 2005, 4.2°C, 20 ppm, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, 1 specimen; Hrauná, Húsafell, West Iceland, 64°42.339´N, 20°59,721´W, 28 July 2005, 4.8°C, 30 ppm, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, 1 specimen; Sandur, Aðaldalur, Northeast Iceland, 65°57.241´N, 17°32.718´W, 7 September 2005, 5°C, 100 ppm, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, 1 specimen; Klappará, Öxarfjörður, Northeast Iceland, 8 September 2005, 5°C, 50 ppm, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, few specimens; Presthólar, Öxarfjörður, Northeast Iceland, 66°15.495´N, 16°24.123´W, 8 September 2005, 4.8°C, 60 ppm, electric fishing, coll. B.K. Kristjánsson, 1 specimen.
Diagnosis
Small size species distinguished by following characters: indication of eye pigment; mandibular palp segment 3 with 4 long plumose E-setae, row of 13 or more short bifid Dsetae and 1 long B-seta; maxilla 2 inner plate with about 8 strong plumose setae in oblique row; maxilliped outer plate apically with 1 spine, 1 naked seta and 1 comb-like seta, inner margin with numerous naked setae; maxilliped inner plate somewhat truncated, apically with 6 plumose setae, naked seta laterodistally, single strong spine on mediodistal corner and medial margin with about 6 plumose setae; gnathopod 1 propodus palmar margin with few bifid spines, defining angle shallow, not distinct, with 6 lateral bifid spines, largest in middle, posterior ones reaching lateral corner, medially 7 short spines, dactylus with spine at base of unguis; gnathopod 2 propodus longer than propodus of gnathopod 1, palmar margin with defining angle shallow, not distinct, with 5 bifid setae on each side, dactylus with spine at base of unguis; uropod short; peduncle short and wide, 2 small naked setae on medial margin, inner ramus vestigial, about 50 % of peduncle length and about 35 % of length of outer ramus, outer ramus 1-segmented, two pairs of spines on lateral margin, two spines on medial margin; 4 apical spines; telson width 68 % of length, apical margin cleft, cleft about 29 % length of telson; apical lobes with 1–2 spines each; stalked, club shaped coxal gills on gnathopod 2 and pereopods 3 to 6, sternal gills/processes absent.
Description of females
Body length (non-ovigerous) 6.0 to 6.9 mm (N = 10) (Fig. 1). Body short and wide, unpigmented. Indication of eye pigment (clearly visible in life specimens). Pleonites and uronites with several fine setae dorsally. Uronites unfused. Interantennal lobe of head narrowly rounded anteriorly, inferior antennal sinus moderately deep. Coxal plates deep, overlapping; increasing in depth from pereonite 1 to 3; coxal plate 4 large, about as long as wide, posterior margin widely concave. Coxal plates 5 to 7 decreasing in size towards coxal plate 7; plate 5 bilobed; plate 6 with posterior end deeper, plate 7 small. Distoposterior corners of pleonal plates 1 and 2 angular, pleonal pate 3 evenly rounded, single seta on posterior margin.
Antenna 1 (Fig. 2 A) long, about 70 % length of body; second peduncle segment 74 % of length of first pedunclar segment; third pedunclar segment 71 % of length of second pedunclar segment; primary flagellum with about 29–30 segments; aesthetascs on most segments, most often 1 aesthetasc, sometimes 2 aesthetascs (Fig. 2 B); accessory flagellum 2-segmented (Fig. 2 C); first segment distally with 2 naked setae and 1 plumose seta; terminal segment short, with 1 naked seta.
Antenna 2 (Fig. 2 D) short, about 26 % of body length; 37 % of length of first antenna. Third pedunclar segment about 92 % of length second pedunclar segment. Flagellum with 9–10 segments.
Upper lip (Fig. 2 E) slightly bilobed apically.
Mandible (Fig. 2 F, G) well developed. Left lacina mobilis 5-dentate, incisor 5-dentate, about 8 large spines and some small in spine row; molar pointed, truncated distally, 1 long seta subapically. Palp with 3 segments (Fig. 2 H), palp segment 2 with 7 naked setae on lateral margin, subequal to palp segment 3; palp segment 3 with 4 long plumose E-setae, row of 13 or more short bifid D-setae and 1 long B-seta.
Lower lip (Fig. 2 I) with small setae on the margins of the outer lobes; mandibular lobes evenly rounded.
Maxilla 1 (Fig. 2 J) inner plate with apical-medial row of about 16 plumose setae. Outer plate truncated, apically with 7 spines, medial margin of spines with numerous fine denticles. Palp 2-segmented, article 2 apically with two comb-like setae, subapically naked setae.
Maxilla 2 (Fig. 2 K) outer plate with two rows of setae; one row with about 11 faintly plumose setae, other row with about 8 faintly plumose setae. Inner plate with about 8 strong plumose setae in oblique row; apically two rows of setae, one with comb-like setae.
Maxilliped (Fig. 3 A). Outer plate (Fig. 3 B) apically with 1 spine, 1 naked seta and 1 comb-like seta; inner margin with numerous naked setae. Inner plate (Fig. 3 C) somewhat truncated, apically with 6 plumose setae, naked seta laterodistally, single strong spine on mediodistal corner; medial margin with about 6 plumose setae. Dactylus with fairly long, Gnathopod 1 (Fig. 3 D) short and stout; coxal plate somewhat longer than wide, with several setae distally; posterior margin of basis distally with few long setae; merus and ischium distally with cluster of naked setae; ischium ventrodistally produced, ventrodistally with few setae; carpus about 82 % of propodus length, with two rows of setae on posterior margin, few setae anterodistally; protopod shorter than protopod of gnathopod 2; propodus ovoid, palmar margin slightly oblique, margin finely serrate, with few bifid spines (Fig. 3 E); defining angle shallow, not distinct, with 6 lateral bifid spines, largest in middle, posterior ones reaching lateral corner, medially 7 short spines (Fig. 3 F); dactylus about 60 % of propodus length; few naked setae on posterior margin, dactylus with spine at base of unguis; unguis about 35 % of dactylus length.
Gnathopod 2 (Fig. 3 G) slender, longer than gnathopod 1; coxal plate longer than wide, with several setae distally; basis longer than basis of gnathopod 1, posterior margin of basis distally with several long setae; ischium produced, posterodistally with few setae; carpus about 85 % of propodus length, with 4 rows of marginal setae with 3–4 setae in each row, posterodistally 7 setae in row; propodus longer than propodus of gnathopod 1, palmar margin slightly oblique, margin finely serrate (Fig. 3 H), with 2 bifid spines and 2 naked setae near insertion of dactyl; defining angle shallow, not distinct, with 5 bifid setae on each side, setae on lateral side larger than setae on median side; posterior margin with rows of marginal setae, with increasing number of setae toward defining angle; dactylus about 50 % of propodus length, with few naked setae on posterior margin; dactylus with spine at base of unguis; unguis about 31 % of dactylus length.
Pereopods 3 and 4 (Figs 4 A, B) slender, considerably longer than pereopod 2. Pereopod 4 slightly longer than pereopod 3; similar in number and placement of setae; pereopod 3 coxal plate longer than wide (width 62 % of length), with several setae distally; basis slender, longest article; carpus about 61 % of ischium length; propodus longer than carpus; propodus about 82 % of ischium length; dactylus about 33 % of propodus length, no spine at base of unguis; pereopod 4 coxal plate longer than wide (width 88% of length), with several setae distally, strongly concave posteriorly; basis slender, longest article; carpus about 65 % of ischium length; propodus longer than carpus; propodus about 82 % of ischium length; dactylus about 31 % of propodus length, no spine at base of unguis.
Pereopods 5–7 (Fig. 4 C; 5A–C) longer than pereopods 3 and 4, similar in length; similar in number and placement of setae; pereopod 7 longest. Coxal plate of pereopod 5 large, bilobed, single seta on posterior end; coxal plates on pereopods 6 and 7 small; basis wide, posterior lobe well developed and overhanging; ischium stout, carpus more slender, longer than ischium; propodus longer than carpus; several stout bifid spines distally on carpus (Fig. 5 D). Dactyl small, about 5 % propodus length, no spine at base of unguis.
Stalked, club shaped coxal gills present on gnathopod 2 and pereopods 3 to 6. Sternal gills/processes not observed. Broodplates present on gnathopod 2 and on pereopods 3–5.
Pleopods 1–3 (Fig. 5 E–G) similar, biramous, unmodified; peduncle bearing 2 coupling spines. Pleopod 1 outer ramus with at least 8–9 free segments and fused segment proximally, inner ramus with at least 7 segment and few fused segment proximally.
Uropod 1 (Fig. 6 A) slender, peduncle with about 8 spines on dorsal surface. Rami subequal; inner ramus with 5 apical spines, 3 spines on mediodorsal surface, 2 spines on laterodorsal surface. Outer ramus with 5 apical spines; about 3 spines on laterodorsal surface.
Uropod 2 (Fig. 6 B) about 67 % of length of uropod 1; peduncle with 2 spines dorsodistally. Outer ramus about 63 % of length of inner ramus, about as long as peduncle, with 5 apical spines and 3 spines on dorsal surface. Outer ramus with 5 apical spines, 5 spines on laterodorsaly, 5 spines mediodorsally.
Uropod 3 (Fig. 6 C, D) short; peduncle short and wide, 2 small naked setae on medial margin; inner ramus vestigial, about 50 % of peduncle length and about 35 % of length of outer ramus; without seta. Outer ramus 1-segmented, flat and wide, two pairs of spines on lateral margin, two spines on medial margin; 4 apical spines.
Telson (Fig. 6 D, E) width about 68 % of length; apical margin cleft, cleft about 29 % length of telson; apical lobes with 1–2 spines each; lateral seta present.
Remarks
Most of the specimens were juveniles and females, having oostegites without setae. Only a few adult females were found. Adult males were not seen, and remain to be described.
The present species falls fairly well within genus Crangonyx. C. islandicus sp. nov., however, does not appear to have sternal gills/processes, usually found on species of the genus Crangonyx. Furthermore, the presence of only a single strong spine on the inner plate of the maxilliped is unique within this genus. We hesitate to designate a new genus due to these small differences. Only a limited number of studies have focused on the function of the sternal gills, which are commonly found in freshwater amphipods. These may serve both in transporting as well as being respiratory organs (Kikuchi et al. 1993). Sternal gills may not be needed in the subterranean waters of Iceland, which are usually high in oxygen levels when not in direct contact with volcanic activity (S.R. Gíslason, pers. comm.), and can be very low in CO2 contents (case shown in Gíslason et al. 1996).
The genus Crangonyx has recently been revised (Zhang & Holsinger 2003). The genus contains 47 species, including the present one. Crangonyx islandicus sp. nov. can be distinguished from all other species of the genus by having only a single strong spine on the inner plate of the maxilliped. Other characteristics useful to distinguish the species from other species of the genus are: presence of a spine at the base of the unguis on gnathopods 1 and 2, relatively short uropod 3, wide telson with shallow notch and absence of sternal gills/processes. The morphological affinity of C. islandicus sp. nov. to the other species or species groups of the family remains unclear.
The species was collected at numerous springs in South, Southwest, West and Northeast Iceland (Fig. 7). At one of the spring inlets into Lake Thingvallavatn C. islandicus sp. nov. occurred together with the other stygobiont amphipod already known in Iceland, i.e. Crymostygius thingvallensis (Kristjánsson & Svavarsson 2004).
C. islandicus sp. nov. was always found at springs, but spring of various sizes, i.e. differing in the volume of the flowing water. Among the largest springs holding amphipods were those opening into Lake Thingvallavatn. The lake it self is about 90 % fed by groundwater (Adalsteinsson et al. 1992) and around 20 % of the groundwater inflow occurs at and nearby Vatnsvik, where C. islandicus sp. nov. has repeatedly been sampled. The site Rangárbotnar holds additionally extensive springs, being the origin of the large river Rangá, as well as the springs of Galtalaekur. In some instances small springs were characterized by sand overlying the recent lava field, with groundwater pouring slowly from the spring.
At all sites the subterranean water was emerging from porous lava fields. The respective lava fields vary in age, but all areas are within the youngest part of the country (<10 0 0 0 years old) (Fig. 7). The spring inlets sampling sites of Vatnsvik, South-western Iceland are located in the Eldborgir lava which has been dated to be of the age of 9130 ± 260 years (Kjartansson 1964; Saemundsson 1992). The site Nautavakir is in the Grímsnes lavas, which are 5500–6500 years old (Jakobsson 1976). The site Laekjarbotnar and the sites at Galtalaekur are all located in the Þjórsá lava. This is the most voluminous lava in Iceland, both in respect to flow and volume. This lava is considered to be 8580 ± 140 years old (Hjartarson 1988). The river Grenlaekur has its origin in the Eldgjárhraun lava, which was formed around the year 934. However, the springs studied are located in the Landbrot lava, which has been dated 6200 ± 100 years before present (Jónsson 1987), although it has been suggested that the lava formed as late as in the 10th century (Larsen 1979). The youngest geological sites from which the species was recorded are those holding the springs at Þverá and the spring near the farm Hunkubakkar. These were located in the lava field Eldhraun, which was formed during the Skaftáreldar eruption in the year 1783.
The origin of the groundwater differs considerably between collecting sites, but remains still poorly recognised in many areas. The springs at Lake Thingvallavatn receive water from the ice cap of the glacier Langjökull. The water flows from the glacier presumably within 10 years to the site at Vatnsvik (Sveinbjörnsdóttir & Johnsen 1992). Many springs in the west of Iceland are known to be fed by the glacier Langjökull, while springs in the north and the northeast are either feed by the large glacier Vatnajökull, or by local sources (surface rain draining through the porous lava), or mixture of both (Arnason 1976). The sampling site at Lake Myvatn receives groundwater from the local high grounds north of the lake (Einarsson et al. 2004).
The Icelandic groundwater differs from groundwater in other countries in having a high pH. It can be up to and above 10 before contact with the atmosphere (Gíslason et al. 1996). Consequently, the high pH can lead to direct pH enhancement of the dissolution rates of the minerals.
description: Published as part of N, Jörundur Svava R S S O & Kristjánsson, Bjarni K., 2006, Crangonyx islandicus sp. nov., a subterranean freshwater amphipod (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Crangonyctidae) from springs in lava fields in Iceland, pp. 1-17 in Zootaxa 1365 on pages 2-13, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.174801