cometadata/datacite-rtg-text-other-reclassification-records huggingface dataset:
Amblyseius herbicolus Chant
Creators: name: Akyazi, Rana
name: Soysal, Mete
name: Altunç, Yunus Emre
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Mesostigmata
Phytoseiidae
Amblyseius
Amblyseius herbicolus

description: Amblyseius herbicolus Chant
Material examined: 7♀♀ (Ulubey, 01.10.2015), 2♀♀ (Ulubey, 20.09.2016), 2♀♀ (Ünye, 03.08.2015), 17♀♀ (Perşembe, 12.08.2015), 8♀♀ (Gülyalı, 19.08.2015), 9♀♀ (Altınordu, 21.07.2015), 9♀♀ (Altınordu, 31.07.2015).
Comments: Amblyseius herbicolus has very wide distribution in the world (Demite et al., 2017). In Turkey, this predatory species was firstly reported on persimmon trees in Ordu by Akyazı et al. (2016). AltunÇ and Akyazı (2019), Akyol (2019) and Döker et al. (2020) also found it on stone, pome and citrus fruit trees, respectively. This mite was classified as Subtype III-c-Generalist predators living in confined space on dicotyledonous plants by McMurtry et al. (2013).
description: Published as part of Akyazi, Rana, Soysal, Mete & Altunç, Yunus Emre, 2022, Species complexes of leaf-inhabiting mites on Prunus laurocerasus L. (Rosaceae) trees in Ordu, Turkey, pp. 9-20 in Acarological Studies 4 (1) on page 12, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.996567, http://zenodo.org/record/8154951
Amblyseius andersoni
Creators: name: Akyazi, Rana
name: Soysal, Mete
name: Altunç, Yunus Emre
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Mesostigmata
Phytoseiidae
Amblyseius
Amblyseius andersoni

description: Amblyseius andersoni (Chant)
Material examined: 2♀♀ (Altınordu, 29.06.2016), 13♀♀ (Altınordu, 21.07.2015), 1♀, 1♂ (Perşembe, 12.08.2015), 8♀♀ (Ünye, 03.08.2015), 2♀♀ (Ünye, 22.06.2016), 1♀ (İkizce, 11.08.2016), 4♀♀ (Fatsa, 11.08.2015), 2♀♀ (Ulubey, 20.09.2016), 1♀ (Ulubey, 01.10.2015), 1♀ (Gülyalı, 19.08.2015), 1♀, 1♂ (Kumru, 29.07.2016).
Comments: Amblyseius andersoni is a very common predatory mite species which shows distribution in more than thirty countries (Demite et al., 2017). In Turkey, it was reported on different plants by many researchers (Çobanoğlu, 1992; Akyazı and Ecevit, 2003, 2005; Çobanoğlu, 2004; İnal, 2005; Yanar and Ecevit, 2005; Bayram and Çobanoğlu, 2007; Kumral and Kovancı, 2007; Özşişli and Çobanoğlu, 2011; Yeşilayer and Çobanoğlu, 2011; Faraji et al., 2011; Özsayın, 2012; Satar et al., 2013; Kasap et al., 2013; GenÇer- GökÇe, 2015; Kumral and Çobanoğlu, 2015a,b; Çobanoğlu and Kumral, 2016; Çobanoğlu and Güldalı, 2017; Akyazı et al, 2017; Soysal and Akyazı, 2018; AltunÇ and Akyazı, 2019; Çobanoğlu et al., 2020; Döker et al., 2020; Ersin et al., 2020). It was classified as Type III Lifestyle-generalist predators by McMurtry et al. (2013).
description: Published as part of Akyazi, Rana, Soysal, Mete & Altunç, Yunus Emre, 2022, Species complexes of leaf-inhabiting mites on Prunus laurocerasus L. (Rosaceae) trees in Ordu, Turkey, pp. 9-20 in Acarological Studies 4 (1) on page 12, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.996567, http://zenodo.org/record/8154951
Amblyseius bryophilus Karg 1970
Creators: name: Akyazi, Rana
name: Soysal, Mete
name: Altunç, Yunus Emre
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Mesostigmata
Phytoseiidae
Amblyseius
Amblyseius bryophilus

description: Amblyseius bryophilus Karg
Material examined: 1♀ (Altınordu, 21.07.2015), 1♀ (Altınordu, 31.07.2015), 1♀ (Kabadüz, 09.08.2016).
Comments: Amblyseius bryophilus was firstly recorded from Germany by Karg (1970). It is also known in France, Hungary, Poland, Serbia, and Turkey (Demite et al., 2017). In Turkey, A. bryophilus was recorded for the first time from Rize province by Döker et al. (2014a). This species was also found on pome fruit trees in Ordu (Akyol, 2019) and Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) in Rize (Döker et al., 2020). Amblyseius spp. were classified as generalist predators-Type III lifestyle (Croft et al., 2004).
description: Published as part of Akyazi, Rana, Soysal, Mete & Altunç, Yunus Emre, 2022, Species complexes of leaf-inhabiting mites on Prunus laurocerasus L. (Rosaceae) trees in Ordu, Turkey, pp. 9-20 in Acarological Studies 4 (1) on page 12, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.996567, http://zenodo.org/record/8154951
Euseius stipulatus
Creators: name: Akyazi, Rana
name: Soysal, Mete
name: Altunç, Yunus Emre
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Mesostigmata
Phytoseiidae
Euseius
Euseius stipulatus

description: Euseius stipulatus (Athias-Henriot)
Material examined: 2♀♀ (Gülyalı, 19.08.2015), 1♀ (Altınordu, 29.06.2016).
Comments: Euseius stipulatus is a common predatory mite worldwide (Demite et al., 2017). It was recorded on citrus (McMurtry, 1977; Çobanoğlu, 1989b), cucumber (Çobanoğlu, 1989a), pome fruits (Akyol, 2019), walnut leaves (Çakır et al., 2020) and olive trees (Ersin et al., 2020) in Turkey. This species was classified as Type IV Lifestyle-Pollen feeding generalist predators by McMurtry et al. (2013).
description: Published as part of Akyazi, Rana, Soysal, Mete & Altunç, Yunus Emre, 2022, Species complexes of leaf-inhabiting mites on Prunus laurocerasus L. (Rosaceae) trees in Ordu, Turkey, pp. 9-20 in Acarological Studies 4 (1) on page 12, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.996567, http://zenodo.org/record/8154951
Euseius gallicus Kreiter and Tixier
Creators: name: Akyazi, Rana
name: Soysal, Mete
name: Altunç, Yunus Emre
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Mesostigmata
Phytoseiidae
Euseius
Euseius gallicus

description: Euseius gallicus Kreiter and Tixier
Material examined: 1♀ (Ünye, 22.06.2016).
Comments: Euseius gallicus was reported for the first time on Tilia platyphyllos Scopoli (Tiliaceae), Prunus cerasus L. (Rosaceae), Aesculus hippocastanum L. (Sapindaceae) and Viburnum tinus L. (Adoxaceae) in France (Tixier et al., 2009). Later, it was determined in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Slovenia, Tunisia and Turkey (Demite et al., 2017). In Turkey, Döker et al. (2014b) recorded this predatory mite on Ipomoea sp. (Convolvulaceae). It was also found on vegetables in Ordu (Soysal and Akyazı, 2018) and walnut leaves in Samsun province (Çakır et al., 2020). This mite is a Type IV- pollen feeding generalist predator (Kreiter et al., 2020).
description: Published as part of Akyazi, Rana, Soysal, Mete & Altunç, Yunus Emre, 2022, Species complexes of leaf-inhabiting mites on Prunus laurocerasus L. (Rosaceae) trees in Ordu, Turkey, pp. 9-20 in Acarological Studies 4 (1) on page 12, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.996567, http://zenodo.org/record/8154951
Paraseiulus triporus
Creators: name: Akyazi, Rana
name: Soysal, Mete
name: Altunç, Yunus Emre
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Mesostigmata
Phytoseiidae
Paraseiulus
Paraseiulus triporus

description: Paraseiulus triporus (Chant and Yoshida-Shaul)
Material examined: 1♀ (Gülyalı, 19.08.2015), 1♀ (Altınordu, 21.07.2015).
Comments: Paraseiulus triporus was reported from almost thirty countries (Demite et al., 2017). In Turkey, this predatory species was firstly reported on quince, apple and cranberry by Çobanoğlu (2004). So far, many researchers found it on the different plants from different regions of Turkey (Kasap and Çobanoğlu, 2007; Yeşilayer and Çobanoğlu, 2011; Özsisli and Çobanoğlu, 2011; Özsayın, 2012; Erdoğan, 2013; Kasap et al., 2013; Satar et al., 2013; GenÇer- GökÇe, 2015; Akyazı et al., 2017; İnak and Çobanoğlu, 2018; Akyol, 2019; AltunÇ and Akyazı, 2019; Keskin, 2019). McMurtry et al. (2013) classified Paraseiulus spp. as Subtype I-c- specialized predators of tydeids.
description: Published as part of Akyazi, Rana, Soysal, Mete & Altunç, Yunus Emre, 2022, Species complexes of leaf-inhabiting mites on Prunus laurocerasus L. (Rosaceae) trees in Ordu, Turkey, pp. 9-20 in Acarological Studies 4 (1) on page 12, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.996567, http://zenodo.org/record/8154951
Panonychus citri
Creators: name: Akyazi, Rana
name: Soysal, Mete
name: Altunç, Yunus Emre
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Trombidiformes
Tetranychidae
Panonychus
Panonychus citri

description: Panonychus citri (McGregor)
Material examined: 5♀♀ (Altınordu, 21.07.2015), 1♀ (Altınordu, 31.07.2015), 6♀♀, 1 nymph (Perşembe, 12.08.2015), 4♀♀, 3♂♂ (Fatsa, 14.06.2016), 1♀ (Ünye, 03.08.2015), 4♀♀ (Ünye, 22.06.2016), 7♀♀, 1♂, 1 nymph (Gülyalı, 19.08.2015).
Comments: Panonychus citri is a major pest of citrus and occasionally attacks grapes, ornamental flowers and evergreen shrubs grown in greenhouses and nurseries (Zhang, 2003). It was reported from all regions of the world (Migeon et al., 2011). P. citri was collected from different plants by Düzgüneş (1952), İnal (2005), Satar et al. (2013), AltunÇ and Akyazı (2019) in Turkey as well.
description: Published as part of Akyazi, Rana, Soysal, Mete & Altunç, Yunus Emre, 2022, Species complexes of leaf-inhabiting mites on Prunus laurocerasus L. (Rosaceae) trees in Ordu, Turkey, pp. 9-20 in Acarological Studies 4 (1) on page 12, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.996567, http://zenodo.org/record/8154951
Tetranychus urticae Koch 1836
Creators: name: Akyazi, Rana
name: Soysal, Mete
name: Altunç, Yunus Emre
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Trombidiformes
Tetranychidae
Tetranychus
Tetranychus urticae

description: Tetranychus urticae Koch (Green form)
Material examined: 2♀♀, 1♂, 1 nymph (Gülyalı, 19.08.2015), 1♀ (Ünye, 22.06.2016), 2♀♀ (Fatsa, 14.06.2016), 1♀ (Kumru, 29.07.2016).
Comments: Tetranychus urticae is a highly polyphagous and cosmopolitan species (Zhang, 2003; Migeon et al., 2011). It was reported by many researchers in Turkey as well (Ulusoy et al., 1999; Özman and Çobanoğlu, 2001; İncekulak and Ecevit, 2002; Yanar and Ecevit, 2005; İnal, 2005; Çetin et al., 2006; Ertop, 2006; Kumral and Kovancı, 2007; Kasap et al., 2008; Elma and Alaoğlu, 2008; Güven, 2008; Özsayın, 2012; Satar et al., 2013; Erdoğan, 2013; Çobanoğlu and Kumral, 2014; GenÇer- GökÇe, 2015; Kumral and Çobanoğlu, 2015a,b; Kutlu, 2016; Akyazı et al., 2017; Çobanoğlu and Güldalı, 2017; Soysal and Akyazı, 2018; Akyol; 2019; AltunÇ and Akyazı, 2019; Keskin, 2019; Cilbircioğlu and Çobanoğlu, 2020; Çobanoğlu et al., 2020; Erdoğan and Çobanoğlu, 2020). On the other hand, we collected few individuals of T. urticae from each location. So, we think that these findings may be originated from accidental infestations. The sampled trees were close to hazelnut orchards. The hazelnut trees and also floor vegetation plants under P. laurocerasus trees can harbor T. urticae and may become a source of infestation for P. laurocerasus trees. This assumption might be addressed in future studies.
description: Published as part of Akyazi, Rana, Soysal, Mete & Altunç, Yunus Emre, 2022, Species complexes of leaf-inhabiting mites on Prunus laurocerasus L. (Rosaceae) trees in Ordu, Turkey, pp. 9-20 in Acarological Studies 4 (1) on page 13, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.996567, http://zenodo.org/record/8154951
Agistemus collyerae Gonzalez
Creators: name: Akyazi, Rana
name: Soysal, Mete
name: Altunç, Yunus Emre
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Trombidiformes
Stigmaeidae
Agistemus
Agistemus collyerae

description: Agistemus collyerae Gonzalez
Material examined: 1♀ (Perşembe, 12.08.2015).
Comments: The genera Agistemus Summers and Zetzellia Oudemans are the second most important predator group after Phytoseiidae (Gerson et al., 2003). Gonzalez-Rodriguez (1963) firstly reported A. collyerae in New Zealand. It was also found Australia, Iran, Italy, Portugal, Turkey (Fan et al., 2016) and South Africa (Saccaggi and Ueckermann, 2018). Saccaggi and Ueckermann (2018) declared that it was detected on products imported from USA, Chile, Yemen, Spain and France to South Africa. In Turkey, the predatory mite was found on Quercus robur L. (Fagaceae) and Cupressocyparis leylandii (A.B. Jacks. & Dallim.) (Cupressaceae) in İstanbul (Yeşilayer and Çobanoğlu, 2013) and Malus domestica Borkh. (Rosales) in Çanakkale (Kasap et al., 2013). It is known to feed on Tetranychus lambi Pritchard & Baker (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) and Aculus fockeui (Nalepa & Trouessart) (Trombidiformes: Eriophyidae) (Saccaggi and Ueckermann, 2018).
description: Published as part of Akyazi, Rana, Soysal, Mete & Altunç, Yunus Emre, 2022, Species complexes of leaf-inhabiting mites on Prunus laurocerasus L. (Rosaceae) trees in Ordu, Turkey, pp. 9-20 in Acarological Studies 4 (1) on page 13, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.996567, http://zenodo.org/record/8154951
Zetzellia mali
Creators: name: Akyazi, Rana
name: Soysal, Mete
name: Altunç, Yunus Emre
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Trombidiformes
Stigmaeidae
Zetzellia
Zetzellia mali

description: Zetzellia mali (Ewing)
Material examined: 1♀ (Fatsa, 11.08.2015).
Comments: Zetzellia mali is widely distributed in the Holarctic region worldwide (Gonzalez-Rodriguez, 1965; Dönel and Doğan, 2013). It was found for the first time in Turkey by Düzgüneş (1963). Later, this species was collected from many provinces by many researchers (Akyazı and Ecevit, 2003; İnal, 2005; Kasap and Çobanoğlu, 2007; Elma and Alaoğlu, 2008; Kasap et al., 2008, 2013; Özsayın, 2012; Satar et al., 2013; Çobanoğlu and Kumral, 2014; Kasap et al., 2014; GenÇer- GökÇe, 2015; Kumral and Çobanoğlu, 2015a,b; Akyazı et al., 2016, 2017; Soysal and Akyazı, 2018; Akyol, 2019; AltunÇ and Akyazı, 2019; Keskin 2019; Çobanoğlu et al., 2020; Erdoğan and Çobanoğlu, 2020). According to Croft (1994), it preys on eggs and immature stages of European red mite and active stages of apple rust mite. Khanjani and Ueckermann (2002) also declared that Z. mali tends to feed on eriophyid mite than adult tetranychid mites. It is known that Z. mali may feed on other predator mite eggs as well (Kain and Nyrop, 1995). Croft (1994) also noted that it can prey on eggs of the predatory phytoseiid mites Typhlodromus occidentalis (Nesbitt) and Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) and other Z. mali.
description: Published as part of Akyazi, Rana, Soysal, Mete & Altunç, Yunus Emre, 2022, Species complexes of leaf-inhabiting mites on Prunus laurocerasus L. (Rosaceae) trees in Ordu, Turkey, pp. 9-20 in Acarological Studies 4 (1) on page 13, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.996567, http://zenodo.org/record/8154951
Tydeus californicus
Creators: name: Akyazi, Rana
name: Soysal, Mete
name: Altunç, Yunus Emre
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Trombidiformes
Tydeidae
Tydeus
Tydeus californicus

description: Tydeus californicus (Banks)
Material examined: 6♀♀, 1♂ (Altınordu, 29.06.2016), 10♀♀, 1♂ (Ünye, 03.08.2015), 14♀♀, 5♂♂ (Ünye, 22.06.2016), 1♀ (Fatsa, 14.06.2016), 1♀ (Çaybaşı, 11.08.2016), 2♀♀ (İkizce, 11.08.2016), 2♀♀ (Ulubey, 01.10.2015), 3♀♀ (Gülyalı, 19.08.2015), 4♀♀, 2♂♂ (Kumru, 29.07.2016), 2♀♀ (Akkuş, 04.06.2016).
Comments: Tydeus californicus is a cosmopolitan species (Tempfli et al., 2015). It has been reported on various hosts in Turkey by many researchers (Çobanoğlu, 1992; Çobanoğlu and Kazmierski, 1999; Özman and Çobanoğlu, 2001; İncekulak and Ecevit, 2002; Akyazı and Ecevit, 2003; Yanar and Ecevit, 2005; Kasap and Çobanoğlu, 2007; Kumral and Kovancı, 2007; Güven, 2008; Kasap et al., 2008; Özsisli and Çobanoğlu, 2011; Yeşilayer and Çobanoğlu, 2011; Özsayın, 2012; Erdoğan and Yanar, 2015; Kasap et al., 2013; Satar et al., 2013; Kasap et al., 2014; GenÇer- GökÇe, 2015; Akyazı et al., 2017; Soysal and Akyazı, 2018; Akyol, 2019; AltunÇ and Akyazı, 2019; Çobanoğlu et al., 2020). Tempfli et al. (2015) notified that this species can play an important role in the management of rust mites.
description: Published as part of Akyazi, Rana, Soysal, Mete & Altunç, Yunus Emre, 2022, Species complexes of leaf-inhabiting mites on Prunus laurocerasus L. (Rosaceae) trees in Ordu, Turkey, pp. 9-20 in Acarological Studies 4 (1) on page 13, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.996567, http://zenodo.org/record/8154951
Tydeus goetzi Schruft 1972
Creators: name: Akyazi, Rana
name: Soysal, Mete
name: Altunç, Yunus Emre
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Trombidiformes
Tydeidae
Tydeus
Tydeus goetzi

description: Tydeus goetzi Schruft
Material examined: 12♀♀, 4♂♂ (Altınordu, 31.07.2015), 4♀♀, 2♂♂ (Altınordu, 21.07.2015), 4♀♀ (Altınordu, 29.06.2016), 7♀♀, 2♂♂ (Perşembe, 12.08.2015), 14♀♀ (Gülyalı, 19.08.2015), 1♀ (Ünye, 03.08.2015), 1♂ (Kabadüz, 09.08.2016).
Comments: Tydeus goetzi has shown limited distribution in world. It was reported in Germany (Schruft, 1972), France (Andre, 2011), and Turkey (Akyazı et al., 2017; Soysal and Akyazı, 2018; AltunÇ and Akyazı, 2019; Akyol, 2019). According to Schruft (1972), T. goetzi feeds on Colomerus vitis (Pagenstecher) and Calepitrimerus vitis (Nalepa) (Trombidiformes: Eriophyidae).
description: Published as part of Akyazi, Rana, Soysal, Mete & Altunç, Yunus Emre, 2022, Species complexes of leaf-inhabiting mites on Prunus laurocerasus L. (Rosaceae) trees in Ordu, Turkey, pp. 9-20 in Acarological Studies 4 (1) on page 13, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.996567, http://zenodo.org/record/8154951
Tydeus calabrus
Creators: name: Akyazi, Rana
name: Soysal, Mete
name: Altunç, Yunus Emre
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Trombidiformes
Tydeidae
Tydeus
Tydeus calabrus

description: Tydeus calabrus (Castagnoli)
Material examined: 1♂ (Ünye, 03.08.2015).
Comments: Tydeus calabrus is a rarely- seen species of genus Tydeus Koch. Little is known of its distribution. Çobanoğlu and Kazmierski (1999) recorded this species from Turkey. Sadeghi et al. (2012) also mentioned it as a new record for Iran.
description: Published as part of Akyazi, Rana, Soysal, Mete & Altunç, Yunus Emre, 2022, Species complexes of leaf-inhabiting mites on Prunus laurocerasus L. (Rosaceae) trees in Ordu, Turkey, pp. 9-20 in Acarological Studies 4 (1) on page 14, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.996567, http://zenodo.org/record/8154951
Tydeus plumosus Karg 1975
Creators: name: Akyazi, Rana
name: Soysal, Mete
name: Altunç, Yunus Emre
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Trombidiformes
Tydeidae
Tydeus
Tydeus plumosus

description: Tydeus plumosus Karg
Material examined: 1♀ (Gülyalı, 19.08.2015).
Comments: Tydeus plumosus was recorded in apple orchards of Serbia (Stojnic et al., 2002) and on wheat in Diyarbakır (Sur) in Turkey (Ueckermann et al., 2019).
description: Published as part of Akyazi, Rana, Soysal, Mete & Altunç, Yunus Emre, 2022, Species complexes of leaf-inhabiting mites on Prunus laurocerasus L. (Rosaceae) trees in Ordu, Turkey, pp. 9-20 in Acarological Studies 4 (1) on page 14, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.996567, http://zenodo.org/record/8154951
Brachytydeus paraobliqua Panou and Emmanuel
Creators: name: Akyazi, Rana
name: Soysal, Mete
name: Altunç, Yunus Emre
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Trombidiformes
Tydeidae
Brachytydeus
Brachytydeus paraobliqua

description: Brachytydeus paraobliqua Panou and Emmanuel
Material examined: 1♂ (İkizce, 11.08.2016).
Comments: Brachytydeus paraobliqua was found in Greece (Panou and Emmanouel, 1996), Hungary (Ripka et al., 2002; Tempfli et al., 2015) and Turkey. In Turkey, it was firstly reported in Samsun by Özman- Sullivan et al. (2005). Later, it was found on Diospyros kaki Thunb. and Diospyros lotus L. (Ebenaceae) by Akyazı et al. (2017) and stone fruit trees by AltunÇ and Akyazı (2019) in Ordu.
description: Published as part of Akyazi, Rana, Soysal, Mete & Altunç, Yunus Emre, 2022, Species complexes of leaf-inhabiting mites on Prunus laurocerasus L. (Rosaceae) trees in Ordu, Turkey, pp. 9-20 in Acarological Studies 4 (1) on page 14, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.996567, http://zenodo.org/record/8154951
Pronematus ubiquitus
Creators: name: Akyazi, Rana
name: Soysal, Mete
name: Altunç, Yunus Emre
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Trombidiformes
Iolinidae
Pronematus
Pronematus ubiquitus

description: Pronematus ubiquitus (McGregor)
Material examined: 3♀♀ (Fatsa, 14.06.2016), 1♀ (Ünye, 22.06.2016).
Comments: This predator species is widely distributed in USA, Egypt and Africa (Baker, 1968). In Turkey, it was reported by Çobanoğlu (1992); Göven et al. (2009); Can and Çobanoğlu (2010); Kumral and Çobanoğlu (2015b); Akyol (2019); Ueckermann et al. (2019). According to Abou-Awad et al. (1999), P. ubiquitus can develop from larva to adult stage when feeds on individuals of the fig bud mite, Eriophyes ficus Cotte and the fig leaf mite, Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer (Trombidiformes: Eriophyidae).
description: Published as part of Akyazi, Rana, Soysal, Mete & Altunç, Yunus Emre, 2022, Species complexes of leaf-inhabiting mites on Prunus laurocerasus L. (Rosaceae) trees in Ordu, Turkey, pp. 9-20 in Acarological Studies 4 (1) on page 14, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.996567, http://zenodo.org/record/8154951
Calvolia undetermined
Creators: name: Akyazi, Rana
name: Soysal, Mete
name: Altunç, Yunus Emre
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Sarcoptiformes
Winterschmidtiidae
Calvolia
Calvolia undetermined

description: Calvolia sp.
Material examined: 3♀♀ (Fatsa, 11.08.2015), 5♀♀ (Altınordu, 31.07.2015), 1♀ (Perşembe, 12.08.2015), 6♀♀ (Kabadüz, 09.08.2016), 2♀♀ (Altınordu, 29.06.2016).
Comments: Different species within the genus Calvolia have been reported from Germany (Moser and Bogenschütz, 1984), Bangladesh (Gupta and Sanyal, 2004), Poland, America and Ukrain (Krantz and Walter, 2009). In Turkey, Calvolia sp. was collected from vegetable (Soysal, 2016) and stone fruit (AltunÇ and Akyazı, 2019) leaves in Ordu. Calvolia spp. are deemed fungivorous by Krantz and Walter (2009).
In spite of seventeen females in the material, the species could not be identified to species level because of their damaged body parts, poor preparation of slides, lack of literature. This is an issue for future research to explore.
description: Published as part of Akyazi, Rana, Soysal, Mete & Altunç, Yunus Emre, 2022, Species complexes of leaf-inhabiting mites on Prunus laurocerasus L. (Rosaceae) trees in Ordu, Turkey, pp. 9-20 in Acarological Studies 4 (1) on page 14, DOI: 10.47121/acarolstud.996567, http://zenodo.org/record/8154951
Raoulia piroculata
Creators: name: Ng, Peter K. L.
name: Rahayu, Dwi Listyo
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2014
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Decapoda
Chasmocarcinidae
Raoulia
Raoulia piroculata

description: Raoulia piroculata (Rathbun, 1911)
(Figs. 4A, B, 5D, 17, 19A–E)
Typhlocarcinops piroculata Rathbun, 1911: 239, pl. 20 figs. 1, 2.
Typhlocarcinodes piroculatus — Barnard 1955: 35, fig. 16.— Serène 1968: 92 (part).
Caecopilumnus piroculatus — Ng 1987: 93.— Ng et al. 2008: 143.
Material examined. Lectotype female (here designated) (7.3 × 5.5 mm) (USNM 41359 a), Amirante Is., Indian Ocean, station E9, 34 fms (62.2 m), coll. J.S. Gardiner, H.M.S. Sealark, 9 October 1905. Paralectotype female (5.9 × 4.5 mm) (USNM 41359 b), same data as lectotype.
Diagnosis. Carapace width 1.3 times length (Fig. 17A). Junction between frontal, supraorbital margins appears gently curved in frontal view (Fig. 17C). Third maxilliped merus about 0.7 length of ischium; ischium rectangular, 1.3 times as long as broad (Fig. 5D). Ambulatory legs relatively longer; merus of last ambulatory leg about 3.1 times as long as broad (Fig. 17A). Male unknown.
Remarks. Raoulia limosa and R. piroculata closely resemble each other. Raoulia piroculata, however, can easily be separated from R. limosa by its longer pereopods (Fig. 17A; Figs. 13A, 14A, 15A for R. limosa), having proportionately the longest ambulatory legs in the genus. In addition, R. piroculata has a relatively longer ischium of the third maxilliped (Fig. 5D; Figs. 5C, 16B for R. limosa); and the junction of the frontal and supraorbital margin is gently curved (Fig. 17C) rather than at right angles in frontal view (Figs. 13D, 14C for R. limosa).
Barnard (1955: 35, fig. 16) described a male (11.0 × 8.5 mm) and a female (9.0 × 7.0 mm) from Delagoa Bay in South Africa. His figures (present Fig 19A–E) leave no doubt this is also a species of Raoulia. Ng (1987) provisionally referred this record to R. limosa, but this is doubtful in view of the present revision of the genus. In terms of its distribution (western Indian Ocean), these specimens are more likely to be the real R. piroculata. The carapace width to length proportions of Barnard’s two specimens is about 1.3, the same to that observed for R. piroculata s. str. but the conditions of the diagnostic third maxillipeds and ambulatory legs are not known. The G1 figured by Barnard (see Fig. 19D, E) seems to have the distal slender part relatively longer than the other congeners now recognised (notably R. limosa and R. galea sp. nov.).
Colour. Not known.
Distribution. Amirante Island and South Africa, western Indian Ocean; 62 m.
description: Published as part of Ng, Peter K. L. & Rahayu, Dwi Listyo, 2014, Revision of the family Acidopsidae Števčić, 2005, and the systematic position of Typhlocarcinodes Alcock, 1900, Caecopilumnus Borradaile, 1902, and Raoulia Ng, 1987, with descriptions of two new genera and five new species (Crustacea: Brachyura: Goneplacoidea), pp. 1-63 in Zootaxa 3773 (1) on pages 30-31, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3773.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4909796
Caecopilumnus Borradaile 1902
Creators: name: Ng, Peter K. L.
name: Rahayu, Dwi Listyo
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2014
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Decapoda
Pilumnidae
Caecopilumnus

description: Caecopilumnus Borradaile, 1902
Caecopilumnus Borradaile, 1902: 237.— Tesch 1918: 226 (part).— Ng 1987: 91 (part).— Ng et al. 2008: 143 (part).
Diagnosis. Carapace subovate to subquadrate; dorsal surface convex, covered with numerous small granules, setose; regions separated by shallow or deep grooves; front entire, margin rounded, bent downwards, lined with numerous long setae obscuring margin; anterolateral margin arcuate, granular, densely hirsute, setae obscuring margin, never distinctly dentate, sometimes with low granuliform lobes covered with several small, large tubercles, granules; anterolateral margins separated from gently converging posterolateral margins. Epistome narrow, prominently sunken. Basal antennal 3 rectangular, longer than wide; article 4 dorsoventrally flattened, twice as long as broad, margins with numerous long plumose setae. Basal antennular article subovate; antennules folding obliquely. Eyes immobile, pear-shaped, tapering to very small cornea, cornea pigmented partially or absent. Third maxillipeds relatively short, leaving narrow gap when closed; merus quadrate to rounded, anterolateral angle rounded; exopod relatively narrow, with long flagellum. Outer surface of palm covered by numerous large tubercles, granules. Propodus, dactylus of last ambulatory leg short. Male thoracic sternum relatively narrow, st1, 2 completely fused to form triangular plate, st3, 4 fused with only lateral sutures discernible; sterno-abdominal cavity reaching to imaginary line joining posterior third of coxae of chelipeds; penis sits exposed between short groove between st7, 8; large part of st8 exposed when abdomen closed, subquadrate in shape; press-button mechanism for holding male abdomen as small rounded tubercle on posterior third of st5. Male abdomen with a1 reaching cx5, lateral parts subtruncate, somite appearing broadly subrectangular; lateral margin of a3 strongly produced, forming acutely triangular structure; a3–5 fused, with sutures visible or shallow. Gl relatively stout, distal surfaces with numerous spinules; G2 as long as G1, distal segment half length of proximal segment.
Remarks. The taxonomy for this genus has been discussed at length in the remarks for the subfamily Raouliinae, and the genera Raoulia and Thecaplax gen. nov. Because the type species, C. hirsutus Borradaile, 1902, is poorly known and represented only by a poorly preserved male and a female, a complete description of C. crassipes is given instead.
description: Published as part of Ng, Peter K. L. & Rahayu, Dwi Listyo, 2014, Revision of the family Acidopsidae Števčić, 2005, and the systematic position of Typhlocarcinodes Alcock, 1900, Caecopilumnus Borradaile, 1902, and Raoulia Ng, 1987, with descriptions of two new genera and five new species (Crustacea: Brachyura: Goneplacoidea), pp. 1-63 in Zootaxa 3773 (1) on pages 35-36, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3773.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4909796
Raoulia galea Ng & Rahayu 2014, sp. nov.
Creators: name: Ng, Peter K. L.
name: Rahayu, Dwi Listyo
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2014
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Decapoda
Chasmocarcinidae
Raoulia
Raoulia galea

description: Raoulia galea sp. nov.
(Figs. 5E, 18, 19F–L)
Material examined. Holotype: male (9.4 × 7.4 mm) (ZRC 2000.0980), intertidal mud flats, Phuket, Thailand, coll. P.K.L. Ng, 3–6 May 2000.
Diagnosis. Carapace width 1.3 times length (Fig. 18A). Junction between frontal, supraorbital margins appears gently curved in frontal view (Fig. 18C). Third maxilliped merus shorter than ischium; ischium quadrangular, 1.1 times as long as broad (Figs. 5E, 19G). Ambulatory legs short; merus of last ambulatory leg 2.8 times as long as broad (Fig. 18A). G1 with distal half distinctly curving towards abdomen in situ, distal part gradually tapering (Fig. 19H–K).
Colour. The freshly collected specimen has a dirty white carapace and pereopods, with the setae brown.
Etymology. The name is derived from Latin galea for helmet, alluding to the general shape of the carapace of the species. The name is used as a noun in apposition.
Remarks. Raoulia galea sp. nov. is most similar to R. limosa, but it can be separated by possessing a somewhat a more quadrate carapace (Fig. 18; Figs. 13A, 14A, 15A for R. limosa); the junction between the frontal and supraorbital margins of R. galea is gently curved (in frontal view) (Fig. 18C) (at right angles in R. limosa; Fig. 13D, 14C); the merus of the third maxilliped is more subovate, with the anterolateral margin gently convex (Figs. 5E, 19G) (more rounded, with the anterolateral margin markedly convex in R. limosa; Figs. 5C, 16B). The G1s of the two species are superficially similar, but in R. galea sp. nov., the distal half curves towards the abdomen (i.e. directed ventrally) in situ (Fig. 19H–K), while in R. limosa, it is bent outwards (Fig. 16D–G). This argues against the two species being conspecific.
Although R. galea sp. nov. is also found in the Indian Ocean like R. piroculata, its carapace appears more rounded in general appearance (Fig. 18A; Fig. 17A for R. piroculata).
Distribution. Phuket, Andaman Sea coast of Thailand, eastern Indian Ocean; intertidal.
description: Published as part of Ng, Peter K. L. & Rahayu, Dwi Listyo, 2014, Revision of the family Acidopsidae Števčić, 2005, and the systematic position of Typhlocarcinodes Alcock, 1900, Caecopilumnus Borradaile, 1902, and Raoulia Ng, 1987, with descriptions of two new genera and five new species (Crustacea: Brachyura: Goneplacoidea), pp. 1-63 in Zootaxa 3773 (1) on page 31, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3773.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4909796
Raoulia calva Ng & Rahayu 2014, sp. nov.
Creators: name: Ng, Peter K. L.
name: Rahayu, Dwi Listyo
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2014
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Decapoda
Chasmocarcinidae
Raoulia
Raoulia calva

description: Raoulia calva sp. nov.
(Figs. 5G, 22, 23, 41B)
Material examined. Holotype: male (6.6 × 5.2 mm) (ZRC 2013.1721), station BMOO-08601, BIZ-138, Moorea, Society Is., Gump Reef, French Polynesia, 17.4901°S 149.8263°W, silty fringing reef wall, under rubble and rocks, 10–20 m, brushing, coll. S. McPherson, 9 November 2009. Paratype: French Polynesia: 1 female (6.5 × 5.1 mm) (ZRC 2013.1722), station BMOO-07884, BIZ-089, in front of Gump Station, near dock, Moorea, Society Is., 17.4908°S 149.8261°W, silty fringing reef wall, under silty rocks, 3–15 m, coll. S. McPherson & G. Paulay, 1 November 2009.
Diagnosis. Carapace width 1.3 times length (Fig. 22A). Junction between frontal, supraorbital margins appears almost right-angled in frontal view (Fig. 22C). Third maxilliped merus short, less than half length of ischium; ischium subquadrate, 1.3 as long as broad (Figs. 5G, 23B). Ambulatory legs short; merus of last ambulatory legs about 2.8 times as long as broad (Fig. 22A). G1 with distal half distinctly curving laterally outwards in situ, distal part dilated (Fig. 23C–F).
Colour. In life, the carapaces of the specimens are dirty white, with the pereopods light brown, and the setae reddish-brown (Fig. 41B).
Etymology. From the Latin calvus for “smooth” and “bald”, alluding to the smooth carapace and chelae, without setae and tubercles
Remarks. Raoulia calva sp. nov. shares with R. piroculata a relatively elongated ischium of the third maxilliped (length to width ratio about 1.3), but their carapaces are different, with that of R. calva sp. nov. proportionately less broad with the front margin more or less straight (Fig. 22C) while in R. piroculata, the front margin is widely triangular (Fig. 17C). Most importantly, while the G1 of R. calva sp. nov. is curved like R. limosa and R. galea sp. nov., its distal part is distinctly dilated (Fig. 23C–F) whereas it is tapering in the other taxa (Figs. 16D–G, 19H–K).
Distribution. Moorea (French Polynesia); 3– 15 m.
description: Published as part of Ng, Peter K. L. & Rahayu, Dwi Listyo, 2014, Revision of the family Acidopsidae Števčić, 2005, and the systematic position of Typhlocarcinodes Alcock, 1900, Caecopilumnus Borradaile, 1902, and Raoulia Ng, 1987, with descriptions of two new genera and five new species (Crustacea: Brachyura: Goneplacoidea), pp. 1-63 in Zootaxa 3773 (1) on page 35, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3773.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4909796
Dorisiana noriegai Sanborn & Heath 2014
Creators: name: Sanborn, Allen F.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2023
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hemiptera
Cicadidae
Dorisiana
Dorisiana noriegai

description: Dorisiana noriegai Sanborn & Heath, 2014
Dorisiana noriegai Sanborn & Heath, 2014: 243 (Azara, Dto. Apóstoles, Misiones, Argentina).
Dorisiana brasilianensis Boulard, 2017: 94 (Wooded savannah around Brasilia, Moyen Xingu, Brazil). n. syn.
REMARKS. The species Dorisiana brasilianensis Boulard, 2017 is described in limited, general terms but sufficient to be a valid taxon under the Code. Importantly, it is described as having lateral uncus branches that are widely spaced, strongly tapering spines that curve inward slightly (Boulard 2017). Although the field image attributed to D. brasilianensis in Boulard (2017), the image is actually a species of Fidicina Amyot & Audinet-Serville, 1843 or Fidicinoides Boulard & Martinelli, 1996 and not the holotype of D. brasilianensis (the body shape, coloration, and distinctive wing shape and infuscation are significantly different in the field image from the holotype illustrated in Boulard (2022)). The holotype of D. brasilianensis is illustrated in Boulard (2022) along with an image of the label data (including the holotype label so there is no possibility of confusion as to what the specimen represents), genitalia images, and the same incorrectly identified image of an animal in the field published with the original description in Boulard (2017).
The images of the holotype and its genitalia in Boulard (2022) clearly represent a species of Dorisiana Metcalf, 1952 and match the description provided in Boulard (2017). In addition, the illustrated genitalia are highly distinctive for the genus and exactly match the genitalia of Dorisiana noriegai Sanborn & Heath, 2014, a species that has been reported from Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, and French Guiana (Sanborn 2019a) and was one of several species considered historically to be Dorisiana metcalfi Sanborn & Heath, 2014 (nom. nov. pro Cicada viridis Olivier, 1790 nec Cicada viridis Linnaeus, 1758) which has significantly different genitalia. As a result, Dorisiana brasilianensis Boulard, 2017 n. syn. is a junior synonym of Dorisiana noriegai Sanborn & Heath, 2014. Dorisiana brasilianensis n. syn. was included in the list of species in Nunes et al. (2023).
DISTRIBUTION. The species is known from Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, and French Guiana (Sanborn 2019a).
description: Published as part of Sanborn, Allen F., 2023, Resolving taxonomic issues of cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) including new combinations, new synonymies, and revised status, with updates on the diversity of the Brazilian cicada fauna and new records for four South American countries, pp. 339-362 in Zootaxa 5318 (3) on page 352, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5318.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/8166896
Carineta viridicollis
Creators: name: Sanborn, Allen F.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2023
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hemiptera
Cicadidae
Carineta
Carineta viridicollis

description: Carineta viridicollis (Germar, 1830)
Cicada viridicollis Germar, 1830: 44 (Brasilia).
Carineta viridicollis var. a Stål, 1862: 19 (Rio de Janiero). n. syn.
REMARKS. A species name is required to have at least two letters to be available under Article 11.9.1 (ICZN 1999). Article 45.6.4 states that varieties published before 1961 become subspecies (ICZN 1999). However, since the taxon is unavailable, it cannot be considered a subspecies. Stål (1862) described the primary difference of the variety as having medial fuscous spots on the abdominal sternites. There are other species of Carineta that have variable ventral abdominal markings (e.g. Sanborn 2019a; 2020a) so the otherwise distinctive markings represent variability within the species. In addition, Stål (1862) reports both the nominotypical species and his variety as being collected in the same locality (Rio de Janiero) so there is no geographic and thus reproductive isolation. Therefore, Carineta viridicollis var. a Stål, 1862 n. syn. is synonymized to Carineta viridicollis (Germar, 1830) rather than providing a nomen novum for the taxon.
DISTRIBUTION. The species has been reported from Brazil, Colombia, French Guiana, Paraguay, and Venezuela (Metcalf 1963c; Duffels & van der Laan 1985; Sanborn 2011b, c, 2013).
description: Published as part of Sanborn, Allen F., 2023, Resolving taxonomic issues of cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) including new combinations, new synonymies, and revised status, with updates on the diversity of the Brazilian cicada fauna and new records for four South American countries, pp. 339-362 in Zootaxa 5318 (3) on pages 352-353, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5318.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/8166896
Parnisa proponens
Creators: name: Sanborn, Allen F.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2023
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hemiptera
Cicadidae
Parnisa
Parnisa proponens

description: Parnisa proponens (Walker, 1858c)
Cicada proponens Walker, 1858c: 312 (Petropolis, Rio Janiero).
Cicada proponens var. b Walker, 1858c: 312 (Rio Janiero). n. syn.
REMARKS. Walker’s variety is also not available and cannot be classified as a subspecies under Articles 11.9.1 and 45.6.4 (ICZN 1999). Walker (1858c) described the variety at the end of the paragraph describing the new species. The Latin version of the species description begins with “[g]reen or yellow”. The variety is distinguished in the English paragraph by being luteus with black marks and luteus basal venation in the fore wings. Green generally fades to yellow in cicadas after death. The amount of time varies but the lack of any structural differences and the fact that both specimens were collected in “Rio Janiero” suggests the observed color differences are simply due to fading of the original green in what Walker (1858c) called a variety. Therefore, Cicada proponens var. b Walker, 1858c n. syn. is synonymized to Parnisa proponens (Walker, 1858c) rather than providing a nomen novum for the taxon.
DISTRIBUTION. The species is endemic to Brazil (Metcalf 1963c).
description: Published as part of Sanborn, Allen F., 2023, Resolving taxonomic issues of cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) including new combinations, new synonymies, and revised status, with updates on the diversity of the Brazilian cicada fauna and new records for four South American countries, pp. 339-362 in Zootaxa 5318 (3) on page 353, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5318.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/8166896
Cicadidae Batsch 1789
Creators: name: Sanborn, Allen F.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2023
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hemiptera
Cicadidae

description: ADDITIONAL BRAZILIAN CICADA RECORDS
The following species have been reported from Brazil but were not included in the synoptic list of Nunes et al. (2023). Current tribal affiliations are provided in parentheses for each taxon. Guyalna aldegondae (Kulgatz, 1902 in Kulgatz & Melichar, 1902) rev. stat., n. comb. (Fidicinini), Guyalna dyticamazona Sanborn, 2020a (Fidicinini) (Sanborn 2020a), Orialella boliviana (Distant, 1904) (Fidicinini) (Sanborn 2019a), Carineta acommosis Sanborn, 2020a (Carinetini) (Sanborn 2020a), Carineta dolosa Boulard, 1986 (Carinetini) (Dorval et al. 2011), Herrera castanetorquata Sanborn, 2020a (Carinetini) (Sanborn 2020a), Herrera melanomesochranon Sanborn, 2019a (Carinetini) (Sanborn 2019a), Herrera polygramma Sanborn, 2020a (Carinetini) (Sanborn 2020a), and Herrera sahlbergi (Stål, 1854) n. comb. (Carinetini).Finally, Cicada brazilensis Metcalf, 1963b (Cicadini), Cicada melanaria Germar, 1830 (Cicadini), Cicada effecta Walker, 1858a (Cicadini), and Cicada leucothe Walker, 1852 (Cicadini) were originally described from Brazil but are missing from the list of Nunes et al. (2023). Specimens will need to be located to determine the correct placement of the species currently assigned to Cicada as the genus is primarily distributed in the western Palearctic region (Marshall et al. 2018). It should be noted that Prosotettix sphecoidea Jacobi, 1907 was assigned to Taphurini in Nunes et al. (2023) instead of Selymbriini where it is currently assigned (Sanborn 2021b).
description: Published as part of Sanborn, Allen F., 2023, Resolving taxonomic issues of cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) including new combinations, new synonymies, and revised status, with updates on the diversity of the Brazilian cicada fauna and new records for four South American countries, pp. 339-362 in Zootaxa 5318 (3) on page 354, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5318.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/8166896
Proarna uruguayensis Berg 1882
Creators: name: Sanborn, Allen F.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2023
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hemiptera
Cicadidae
Proarna
Proarna uruguayensis

description: Proarna uruguayensis Berg, 1882 new record
Proarna uruguayensis Berg, 1882: 43 (Montevideo, Uruguay).
REMARKS. The species is associated with grass and was collected in large numbers in the same habitat as Proarna gianucai Sanborn, 2008b.
DISTRIBUTION. The species has been reported previously from Uruguay and Argentina (Metcalf 1963a; Sanborn & Heath 2014).
MATERIAL EXAMINED fOR NEW RECORD. “ Brazil / 10 km South of Cassino Beach / 10 February 1993 / N.M. Gianuca coll. / Assoc. with Androtrichum trigynum / Nocturnal sampling ” one male (AFSC); “ Brazil / Cassino Beach / 14 February 1993 / N.M. Gianuca coll. / Ex. Panicum racemosum ” four males (AFSC); “ Brazil / 15 km South of Cassino Beach / 30 January 1991 / N.M. Gianuca coll. / Ex. Panicum racemosum ” two males (AFSC); “ Brazil / 17 km South of Cassino Beach / 25 January 1995 / collected on the vegetation (beach / grass) of the coastal dunes / N.M. Gianuca col.” three males and 13 females (AFSC); “ Brazil / 3 km North of Cassino Beach / 20 January 1995 / collected on the vegetation (beach / grass) of the coastal dunes / N.M. Gianuca col.” one male and five females (AFSC).
description: Published as part of Sanborn, Allen F., 2023, Resolving taxonomic issues of cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) including new combinations, new synonymies, and revised status, with updates on the diversity of the Brazilian cicada fauna and new records for four South American countries, pp. 339-362 in Zootaxa 5318 (3) on page 355, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5318.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/8166896
Herrera dentata Sanborn 2020
Creators: name: Sanborn, Allen F.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2023
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hemiptera
Cicadidae
Herrera
Herrera dentata

description: Herrera dentata Sanborn, 2020a
Herrera dentata Sanborn, 2020a: 101 (Moyabamba, vic. Ecológico “Rumipata”, S 06º 04’32.0”, W 076º 58’ 07.5”, 970 m, Peru).
REMARKS. Specimens were collected in intercept flight traps inside stands of African mahogany (Khaya grandifoliola C.DC.) with a few specimens collected in fragments of riparian forest (C. Flechtmann personal communication). Specimens are deposited in the Museu de Entomologia da Faculdade de Engenharia de Ilha Solteira, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Ilha Solteira, S„o Paulo, Brazil (MEFEIS).
DISTRIBUTION. The species has been reported previously from Peru (Sanborn 2020a).
MATERIAL EXAMINED fOR NEW RECORD. “BR-MG-Capinópolis, Fazenda Grama, riparian forest fragment, 18°46’11.79”S 49°28’32.72”W, ethanol-baited FIT, C. Faria col., 16/XII/2022 ” one male (MEFEIS); same data except 13/XII/2021, one female (MEFEIS); same data except 11/XI/2022, one female (MEFEIS); “BR-MGCapinópolis, Fazenda Grama, Khaya grandifoliola stand planted Nov2013, 18°45’58.1”S 49°29’02.0”W, ethanol-baited FIT, C. Faria col., 05/XII/2021 ” one female (MEFEIS); same data except 12/XII/2022 one female (MEFEIS); same data except 05/XII/2021 one female (MEFEIS); same data except 11/XI/2022 two females (MEFEIS); same data except 20/I/2023 two females (MEFEIS); “BR-MG-Capinópolis, Fazenda Grama, Khaya grandifoliola stand planted Nov2013, 18°45’58.1”S 49°29’02.0”W, sulcatol-baited FIT, C. Faria col., 05/XII/2021 “ one female (MEFEIS); “BR-MG-Capinópolis, Fazenda Grama, Khaya grandifoliola stand planted Nov2014, 18°46’06.2”S 49°28’51.7”W, ethanol-baited FIT, C. Faria col., 14/I/2022 ” one female (MEFEIS); same data except 20/I/2023 one female (MEFEIS); same data except 27/I/2023 two females (MEFEIS); same data except 03/II/2023 four females (MEFEIS); “BR-MG-Capinópolis, Fazenda Grama, Khaya grandifoliola stand planted Nov2015, 18°46’07.3”S 49°28’38.6”W, ethanol-baited FIT, C. Faria col., 31/XII/2021 ” one female (MEFEIS); same data except 26/XI/2022 one female (MEFEIS); same data except 02/XII/2022 one female (MEFEIS); same data except 23/XII/2022 one female (MEFEIS).
description: Published as part of Sanborn, Allen F., 2023, Resolving taxonomic issues of cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) including new combinations, new synonymies, and revised status, with updates on the diversity of the Brazilian cicada fauna and new records for four South American countries, pp. 339-362 in Zootaxa 5318 (3) on page 355, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5318.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/8166896