About the Decision of Teresa Williams to Apply for a Concealed Pistol License (CPL) After Falling Victim to Sexual Coercion at the Workplace - #Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W - #Sexual Assault Awareness Month (SAAM) in the City of Watsonville, California
Creators: name: Michael A. Ayele (A.K.A) W
Publisher: name: OSF
Year: 2023
Subjects: #Michael A.Ayele (a.k.a) W Correspondence With the City of Watsonville, California About the Sexual Coercion of Teresa Williams
#National Sexual Violence Resource Center (NSVRC)
#Retaliation Suffered by Teresa Williams After Filing Title VII Complaint With the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
#Rosa Parks Worked at the Intersection of Race-Based and Gender-Based Violence
#Second (2nd) Amendment Rights Implications of Filing Title VII Complaint Pursuant to Provisions of 1964 Civil Rights Act
#Sexual Assault Awareness Month (SAAM) in the City of Watsonville, California
#Sixth (6th) Amendment Rights Implications of Filing Title VII Complaint
#Teresa Williams Concealed Pistol License (CPL) Application After Falling Victim to Sexual Coercion at the Workplace
#University of Missouri - Kansas City (UMKC) Definition for What Constitutes "Sexual Coercion"

description: Despite statements indicating that they would reflect “on the often over-looked achievements of women such as Susan B. Anthony, Rosa Parks, Abigail Adams and Sojourner Truth,” the City of Watsonville (California) denied holding conversations about [1] the decision of the National Sexual Violence Resource Center (NSVRC) to identify Rosa Parks as a Black woman, who “worked at the intersection of race-based and gender-based violence;” [2] Teresa Williams as a woman, who (i) was coerced to engage in sexual activity she didn’t consent to during her employment with the Iron Mountain Police Department (IMPD located in the State of Michigan); (ii) filed a charge of employment discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act as a direct consequence of the sexual coercion she experienced; (iii) was informed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) that her charge of employment discrimination would not be referred to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for prosecution; (iv) is not legally represented by the DOJ in the complaint she filed with the United States District Court in Michigan; (v) may be seen (by the courts) as having “less merit than” other U.S government employees, who were legally represented by the DOJ following the filing of their complaint pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act. As a matter of principle, the Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) unequivocally condemns violence committed against women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their national origins, their religious affiliations, their disability status and/or their age groups. It is the judgment of the AACL (based on the definition provided by the University of Missouri – Kansas City for what constitutes “sexual coercion”) that the Title VII complaint filed by Teresa Williams should have been referred by the EEOC to the DOJ for prosecution. Regrettably, this didn’t happen. The AACL wishes Teresa Williams well in her future endeavors. Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist