Heritage Speakers as Part of the Native Language Continuum
Creators: name: Wiese, Heike
name: Alexiadou, Artemis
name: Allen, Shanley
name: Bunk, Oliver
name: Gagarina, Natalia
name: Iefremenko, Kateryna
name: Martynova, Maria
name: Pashkova, Tatiana
name: Rizou, Vicky
name: Schroeder, Christoph
name: Shadrova, Anna
name: Szucsich, Luka
name: Tracy, Rosemarie
name: Tsehaye, Wintai
name: Zerbian, Sabine
name: Zuban, Yulia
Publisher: name: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Year: 2022
Subjects: subject: heritage speakers
subject: registers
subject: participles
subject: word order
subject: bare NPs
subject: boundary tone
subject: referent introduction
subject: relative clause formation
subject: 150 Psychologie

description: This article was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Open Access Publication Fund of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
description: We argue for a perspective on bilingual heritage speakers as native speakers of both their languages and present results from a large-scale, cross-linguistic study that took such a perspective and approached bilinguals and monolinguals on equal grounds. We targeted comparable language use in bilingual and monolingual speakers, crucially covering broader repertoires than just formal language. A main database was the open-access RUEG corpus, which covers comparable informal vs. formal and spoken vs. written productions by adolescent and adult bilinguals with heritage-Greek, -Russian, and -Turkish in Germany and the United States and with heritage-German in the United States, and matching data from monolinguals in Germany, the United States, Greece, Russia, and Turkey. Our main results lie in three areas. (1) We found non-canonical patterns not only in bilingual, but also in monolingual speakers, including patterns that have so far been considered absent from native grammars, in domains of morphology, syntax, intonation, and pragmatics. (2) We found a degree of lexical and morphosyntactic inter-speaker variability in monolinguals that was sometimes higher than that of bilinguals, further challenging the model of the streamlined native speaker. (3) In majority language use, non-canonical patterns were dominant in spoken and/or informal registers, and this was true for monolinguals and bilinguals. In some cases, bilingual speakers were leading quantitatively. In heritage settings where the language was not part of formal schooling, we found tendencies of register leveling, presumably due to the fact that speakers had limited access to formal registers of the heritage language. Our findings thus indicate possible quantitative differences and different register distributions rather than distinct grammatical patterns in bilingual and monolingual speakers. This supports the integration of heritage speakers into the native-speaker continuum. Approaching heritage speakers from this perspective helps us to better understand the empirical data and can shed light on language variation and change in native grammars. Furthermore, our findings for monolinguals lead us to reconsider the state-of-the art on majority languages, given recurring evidence for non-canonical patterns that deviate from what has been assumed in the literature so far, and might have been attributed to bilingualism had we not included informal and spoken registers in monolinguals and bilinguals alike.