Promitobates ornatus Mello-Leitao 1922
Creators: name: Bragagnolo, Cibele
name: Pinto-Da-Rocha, Ricardo
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2012
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Opiliones
Gonyleptidae
Promitobates
Promitobates ornatus

description: Promitobates ornatus (Mello-Leitão, 1922)
(Figs. 5 B, 7F, 9F, 11F, 13F, 15B, 17G–I)
Neomitobates ornatus Mello-Leitão, 1922: 343; 1923: 164, fig. 29 [Brazil, São Paulo, Alto of Serra; syntype MZSP 41, syntype; MZSP 479, 5 syntypes; MZSP 494; 7 syntypes, not examined, lost].
Promitobatoides ornatus: Mello-Leitão, 1927: 22; Roewer, 1931b: 114, fig. 4 (desc.); Mello-Leitão, 1932: 404, fig. 268 (rdesc.).
Promitobates ornatus: B. Soares, 1943: 56 (syst.); 1944a: 248 (cit.); 1944b: 222 (cit.); 1944c: 177 (cit.); 1944d: 283 (cit.); 1945a: 238 (cit.); 1946: 511 (cit.); H. Soares, 1945: 224; Soares & Soares, 1949: 238 (cat.); Kury 2003: 152 (cat.; syst.); Bragagnolo et al 2007: 393 (cit.).
Batomites spitzi Mello-Leitão, 1931b: 142, fig. 12 (desc.); 1935b: 109 (syst.). [Brazil, São Paulo: Alto da Serra; holotype 3 MNRJ 11394, examined]. Synonymy established by B. Soares, 1943.
Batomites heteracanthus Mello-Leitão, 1935b: 27, fig. 20 (desc.). [Brazil, São Paulo: São Paulo; 2 syntypes 3, MNRJ 41810, examined]. Synonymy established by Kury 2003.
Promitobates heteracanthus: B. Soares, 1945b: 368 (desc.); Soares & Soares, 1949: 237 (cat.). Synonymy established by Kury 2003.
Promitobates decoratus Mello-Leitão, 1932: 402, fig. 267 (desc.); 1937: 293 (cit.); Soares & Soares 1949: 237 (cat). [Brazil, São Paulo: São Sebastião; holotype 3 (MLPC 958/ MNRJ), not examined, lost]. New synonymy.
Promitobates margaritatus Roewer, 1931: 109, fig 2 (desc.); Mello-Leitão, 1932: 403 (cat.; syst.); Soares & Soares, 1949: 237 (cat.); Kury 2003: 152 (cat; syst.). [Brazil, Rio de Janeiro: Itatiaia; holotype 3 (SMF RII 1392/3) examined]. New synonymy.
Diagnosis. This species is closely related to P. nigripes and P. intermedius by the color of of tubercles of dorsal scutum sulphurous yellow. It can be distinguished of P. nigripes by free tergite III unarmed and of P. intermedius by absence of the row of tubercles on posterior groove of area IV.
Male redescription. Measurements (n=6). Dorsal scutum; maximum width: 4.6–5.3; total length: 4.5–4.6; prosoma length: 1.7–1.9. Leg IV; length of external apophysis of coxa: 1.1–1.4; femur IV length: 42.5–47.4. Tarsal formula: 6–8; 14–16; 8; 8.
Dorsum (Figs. 5 B, 7F). Anterior margin of prosoma with frontal hump with row of small tubercles and one or two tubercles on the corners. Prosoma with tubercles behind ocularium arranged in “V”. Ocularium with one pair of high divergent spiniform apophyses and small tubercles scaterred. Area I with one pair of tubercles and one row of small tubercles up to the posterior groove. Area II with transverse rows of tubercles up to the the posterior groove. Areas III and IV with tubercles on median region, roughly in rows. Area III with two high spiniform apophyses slightly directed posteriorly. Area IV with a pair of tubercles. Posterior margin of dorsal scutum with one row of tubercles (larger on corners) and one pair of small spiniform median apophyses. Free tergites with small tubercles on the corners and rows of three to five paramedian tubercles.
Chelicera. Segment I with two setiferous tubercles; segment II unarmed.
Pedipalp. Trochanter with a small ventral spine. Femur with one ventral basal and one subapical, prolateral spine. Tibia setation: mesal IiIi; ectal IiIi. Tarsus setation: mesal IIi; ectal IiIi/IIi.
Venter. Coxa I with median row of six setiferous tubercles and three apical tubercles; trochanter I with median tubercle. Coxa II with median row of eight small setiferous tubercles and four apical tubercles; trochanter II with two median tubercles. Coxa III with small setiferous tubercles, distributed roughly em rows; trochanter III with median tubercle and small tubercles scattered; coxa IV with scattered tubercles and two tubercles on posterior margin; genital area, free sternites and anal operculum with small granules.
Legs (Fig. 9 F). Coxa I with anterior dorso basal apophysis and a posterior apophysis; coxa II with anterior dorso basal apophysis and one posterior; coxa III with anterior dorso basal apophysis; coxa IV with few and high tubercles, with small internal spiniform apophysis and one external apical bifid apophysis. Trochantesr I–III with small scattered tubercles. Trochanter IV with one dorsal subapical apophysis, one external basal apophysis, and one internal apical spiniform apophysis. Femur IV straight with minute tubercles, more than 12 times longer than dorsal scutum.
Penis (Fig. 17 G, H, I). Ventral plate convex, apex straight and distal margin corner rounded and directed ventrally; three pairs of distal setae (median smaller); three pairs of basal setae arranged in “V” and one pair of small basal ventral setae. Stylus unarmed, apex straight and swollen. Ventral process almost parallel to the stylus, truncus short, apex spoon-shaped, with serrate margins directed ventrally.
Coloration (Fig. 15 B). Dorsal scutum dark-brown, tubercles of dorsal scutum, apophyses of posterior margin of dorsal scutum and ocularium sulphurous yellow.
Female redescription (Figs. 11 F, 13F). Measurements (n=3). Dorsal scutum; maximum width: 4.1–4.3; total length: 4.4–4.6; prosoma length: 1.7–1.8. Femur IV length IV: 14–16. Tarsal formula: 6–8; 14–15; 8; 9. Body more convex than male. Posterior margin of dorsal scutum with one pair of high apophyses, directed posteriorly. Free tergite II with median apophysis. External apical apophysis of coxa IV short and single-branched; internal apophysis absent. Trochanter IV with small internal apical spiniform apophysis; femur IV shorter than male.
Geographical distribution. Costal Atlantic Rain Forest of São Paulo and southeastern of Rio de Janeiro States (Fig. 3 C).
Remarks. Promitobates decoratus and Promitobates margaritatus are considered synonymous of Promitobates ornatus because its shows exclusive festures of this species: free tergite III unarmed, absence of row of tubercles on posterior margin of last area of dorsal scutum and posterior margin of dorsal scutum with one pair of small spiniform median apophyses.
Other material examined. BRAZIL. São Paulo: Santo André (Estação Biológica de Paranapiacaba), R. Pinto-da-Rocha & S. Casari leg., 25.I.1997 10 3 and 5 Ƥ (MZSP 17659); idem, 2 3 and 1 Ƥ (MZSP 1653); idem, 2 Ƥ (MZSP 448); idem, 1 3 and 2 Ƥ (MZSP 894); idem, 3 3 and 5 Ƥ (MZSP 1702); idem, 2 3 and 1 Ƥ (MZSP 1703); idem, C. Rheims & R. Indicatti leg. 14–16. XII.2003, 1 3 (IB 4818); idem, R. Pinto-da-Rocha & S. Casari, XII.1996, 3 3 and 5 Ƥ (MZSP 17633); idem, R. Pinto-da-Rocha et al. leg., 17.V.1998, 2 3 and 4 Ƥ (MZSP 16428); idem, 1 Ƥ (MZSP 19525); idem, R. Pinto-da-Rocha et al. leg, 28.XII.1999, 1 3 (MZSP 23595); idem, W. Bokermann leg., X.1951, 1 3 and 2Ƥ (MZSP 9977); Salesópolis (Estação Biológica de Boracéia), A.G. Mello leg. 19.XI.1991, 2 3 and 1 Ƥ (MZSP 29447); idem, R. Pinto-da-Rocha et al. leg, 18–19. V.2001, 1 3 and 1 Ƥ (MZSP 23664); idem, 1 3 (MZSP 23662); idem, R. Pinto-da-Rocha leg, 30.X.1991, 1 Ƥ (MZSP 14391); idem, G. Machado & V. Bonato, 2.V.1999, 1 3 (MZSP 27187); idem, Equipe Biota leg. 18–24. V.2001, 3 3 (IB 4220); idem, Rabello leg., 2.II.1967, 1 3 (MZSP 9974); idem, R. Pinto-da-Rocha et al. leg. 26–28. I.1999, 4 3 and 2 Ƥ (MZSP 17607); idem, R. Pinto-da-Rocha et al. leg, 18–19. V.2001, 1 3 (MZSP 23661); idem, 1 3 (MZSP 17619); idem, P. Biasi leg., 2.IX.1965 1 3 and 1 Ƥ (MZSP 9986); São Sebastião (Ilhabela), C.R.M. Santos leg., 28.X.1995, 1 3 and 1 Ƥ (MZSP 17158); idem, G. Machado leg. I.1998, 1 3 (MZSP 16678); idem, (Parque Estadual de Ilhabela), Equipe Biota leg. 09–15. X.2001, 1 3 (IB 3740); idem, 1 Ƥ (IB 3760); idem (Barra do Una), K. Lenko leg, 03.VII.1961, 2 Ƥ Bertioga (Caiubura), F.A.G. Mello leg. 28.IX.1995, 2 3 and 1 Ƥ (MZSP 14401); idem (Guaratuba), F.A.G. Mello leg. 28.IX–10. XI.1995 1 3 and 1 Ƥ (MZSP 17153); Cubatão (Copebrás), C. Bragagnolo et al leg, II–IX. 2005, 20 3 and 17 Ƥ (MZSP 27441–27460); Cotia (Reserva Morro Grande), A.A. Nogueira et al. leg. III.2003, 4 3 (MZSP 25891, 25892, 25893, 25894); idem, A.A. Nogueira et al. leg., VII.2006, 9 3 and 6 Ƥ (MZSP 27850, 27851, 27852, 27853, 27854, 27855, 27856, 27857, 27858, 27859 and 27860); Guarujá (mountain at Praia de Iporanga), M.B. da Silva et al. leg., 06.III.2004, 9 3 and 1 Ƥ (MZSP 22888); Juquitiba (Sítio Boungaville), S. Cunha leg. X. 1996, 1 3 (IB 775); Miracatu (Fazenda Iterei), Equipe Biota leg. 20–26. IX.2001, 1 3 (MZSP 27410); idem, 2 3 (MZSP 27409); idem, 1 3 (IB 3515); idem, 1 Ƥ (IB 3562); São Miguel Arcanjo (Parque Estadual de Carlos Botelho), L.O.M. Mestre leg, 17.II. 1997 2 3 (MZSP 27422); Ibiúna, T.V. Santos leg, V.1991, 3 Ƥ IB 762); Juquiá, J.L. Lima & J. Damico leg, 12.XII.1941, 1 Ƥ and 1 3 (MZSP 0072). Rio de Janeiro: Angra dos Reis (Lídice), A.B. Kury& R. Pinto-da-Rocha leg., 01.II.1997, 2 3 (MZSP 29185).
description: Published as part of Bragagnolo, Cibele & Pinto-Da-Rocha, Ricardo, 2012, Systematic review of Promitobates Roewer, 1913 and cladistic analysis of Mitobatinae Simon, 1879 (Arachnida: Opiliones: Gonyleptidae), pp. 1-48 in Zootaxa 3308 on pages 25-26, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.280969