For the first time in history pure logic against human centric religious gods is immune without need of science as leads to logical fallacy
Creators: name: mosinyan, Isaac
Publisher: name: figshare
Year: 2025
Subjects: classificationCode: 500306
subject: Ethical theory
classificationCode: 500501
subject: Theology
classificationCode: 430314
subject: History of religion
classificationCode: 441014
subject: Sociology of religion
classificationCode: 500316
subject: Philosophy of religion
classificationCode: 520504
subject: Psychology of religion
classificationCode: 360201
subject: Creative writing (incl. scriptwriting)
classificationCode: 500405
subject: Religion, society and culture
classificationCode: 461002
subject: Human information behaviour
classificationCode: 520401
subject: Cognition
classificationCode: 500312
subject: Philosophy of cognition
classificationCode: 500308
subject: Logic

description: This paper explores the deterministic nature of logic and how it inevitably leads to the conclusion that human-centric religious gods are logical fallacies. By analyzing the fundamental principles of intelligence, decision-making, and problem-solving, the study demonstrates that a maximally intelligent and omnibenevolent god is incompatible with the reality of involuntary suffering. Using a rigorous logical framework, it systematically dismantles theological claims, exposing contradictions and fallacies inherent in religious reasoning. This work contributes to the philosophy of religion, cognitive science, and the study of theological logic by illustrating how, once key concepts are connected, the traditional notion of god collapses under logical scrutiny.<b>I don’t want to say the science behind of my paper is useless that disprove gods, because i know that was mostly targeted for atheists and experts and thinkers and normal religious people rather than radical religious people, there are theists that could go as far like at extremes, to the point saying "god is beyond laws of physics" and such, so thats another problem that requires to solve and prove is a god is logical fallacy, we must use their own logic and pure logic itself rather than science. What i say is, the only way to win religion, is to use pure logic and show god is logical fallacy, like every action has reaction idea itself, nobody can doubt that, it makes no sense to deny the mechanism of that logic. Thankfully, a mental simulation can prove us even if we assume everything is fake almost in case of science because some satanic illuminati control science, then you must use religion to convince them they are wrong and we must start what is a human based on Christianity and islam, thats very basic and easy to answer for them. In the end conclusion, we see the fact we dont live in a world that were gods in fake world, real gods cannot exist like the religious ones even when science exists today and is not magic like electricity. Christian religious sources say "The human person, created in the image and likeness of God, participates in and represents the essential truth and goodness of God." </b>In that neutral reality of such god, infinite growth is also possible, because we know a all powerful god can do it, besides any human as immortal eventually will gather large amount of information and knowledge and experiences, gaining increased intelligent and wisdom as other religious or spiritual teachings that are telling us about. The idea of a god allowing suffering for "greater good" or "spiritual growth" is dismissed as a logical fallacy because it conflicts with the concept of an intelligent being whose purpose is to maximize problem-solving and survival. In this view, suffering is not an inevitable part of existence, suffering becomes a option and that option would happen due to boredom possibly, as result a person might give up paranormal powers like becoming superman and live like a normal person to be more greatful the creation of god in the simplicity eventually, not much different than a billionare that tried most amazing things and now get humbled and lives a simple life, so the logical structure of such a world would allow for an individual to continually grow, learn, and experience without the emotional bias that religious systems often attribute to god’s will. The result of this?, shows it aligns with the idea of religious god where it doesn’t make a perfect world that humans act like robots and obey god deterministically without free will, it still align with spiritual teachings and is more logical result, god remains still neutral and absolutely just here. As for intelligent, it makes no sense a god to exist beyond intelligent, because without intelligent you cant make decision making to begin with. That itself is logical fallacy, so no expert can still win me against the entire pdf file, it is the first immune atheist pure logic that debunks religion perfectly. Saying a god is beyond intelligent, is like saying god is beyond action and reaction, it causes reaction without action, thats a logical fallacy that often religious or radical people often solve it by saying god always existed, this way is not logical fallacy at least in such terrible way.