"WHAT OPEN SCIENCE DO WE WANT? Challenges and disputes for the democratization of knowledge"
Creators: name: Oliveira, Thaiane M. de
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Open Science
Epistemic Crisis
Global South
Latin America
Platformization of Science
Illiberal Turn

description: Open science has become an important global agenda. However, there are many challenges for the implementation of open science in Latin America and in countries of the Global South. The purpose of this workshop is to discuss the difficulties and challenges for open science in the Global South, with a focus on Latin America, in a context of platformization of science and epistemic crisis.
description: {"references": ["Oliveira, T. M., Marques, F. P. J., Veloso Le\u00e3o, A., de Albuquerque, A., Prado, J. L. A., Grohmann, R., ... &amp; Guazina, L. S. (2021). Towards an inclusive agenda of open science for communication research: A Latin American approach. Journal of Communication", "Dutta, M., Ramasubramanian, S., Barrett, M., Elers, C., Sarwatay, D., Raghunath, P., ... &amp; Zapata, D. (2021). Decolonizing open science: Southern interventions. Journal of Communication", "ALBAGLI, Sarita; CLINIO, Anne; RAYCHTOCK, Sabryna. Ci\u00eancia Aberta: correntes interpretativas e tipos de a\u00e7\u00e3o\u2502 Open Science: interpretive trends and types of action. Liinc em Revista, v. 10, n. 2, 2014", "Albornoz,D.(2018,November1-4).ReimaginingOpenScienceThroughaFeministLens.Open Con. Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, Toronto,Canada", "ANGELL, Nate. Roadmap for Open Science, 2018. Dispon\u00edvel em: https://jrost.org/2018/09/13/workshop.html", "ARA\u00daJO, Ronaldo Ferreira; APPEL, Andr\u00e9 Luiz. O financiamento de projetos de pesquisa em ci\u00eancia aberta: an\u00e1lise de dados da base Dimensions. Encontros Bibli: revista eletr\u00f4nica de biblioteconomia e ci\u00eancia da informa\u00e7\u00e3o, v. 26, n. Especial, p. 1-19, 2021", "Beigel,F.2016).PeripheralScientists,betweenArielandCaliban.InstitutionalCapitalandCircuitsofRecognitioninArgentina.The'Ca reer-bestPublications'oftheResearchersatCONICET.Dados,59,", "DAVID, A. P. The Historical Origins of 'Open Science': An Essay on Patronage, Reputation and Common Agency Contracting in the Scientific Revolution (January 30, 2013). Capitalism and Society, Vol. 3, Issue 2, Article 5, 2008.", "BARTLING, S\u00f6nke; FRIESIKE, Sascha. Opening science: The evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing. Springer-Verlag GmbH, 2014.", "FENSTER, Mark. Transparency in search of a theory. European journal of social theory, v. 18, n. 2, p. 150-167, 2015", "LARIVI\u00c8RE, Vincent; HAUSTEIN, Stefanie; MONGEON, Philippe. The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PloS one, v. 10, n. 6, p. e0127502, 2015.", "MUNAF\u00d2, Marcus R. et al. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature human behaviour, v. 1, n. 1, p. 0021, 2017.", "NISSENBAUM, Helen. A contextual approach to privacy online. Daedalus, v. 140, n. 4, p. 32-48, 2011.", "OLIVEIRA, Thaiane et al. \"Those on the Right Take Chloroquine\": The Illiberal Instrumentalisation of Scientific Debates during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brasil. Javnost-The Public, v. 28, n. 2, p. 165-184, 2021", "OLIVEIRA, Thaiane Moreira et al. Como enfrentar a desinforma\u00e7\u00e3o cient\u00edfica? Desafios sociais, pol\u00edticos e jur\u00eddicos intensificados no contexto da pandemia. Liinc em Revista, v. 16, n. 2, p. e5374-e5374, 2020.", "TURILLI, Matteo; FLORIDI, Luciano. The ethics of information transparency. Ethics and Information Technology, v. 11, n. 2, p. 105-112, 2009.", "Vessuri,H.,Gu\u00e9don,J.C.,&amp;Cetto,A.M.(2014).Excellenceorquality? impactofthecurrentcompetitionregimeonscienceandscientificpublishinginLatinAmericaanditsimplications for development.Current sociology, 62(5),647-665", ".WATERS, A. From \"Open\" to Justice: Audrey Watters @ OpenCon 2014. Dispon\u00edvel em "]}