Intercomparison of in situ measurements of ambient NH 3: instrument performance and application under field conditions
Creators: name: Twigg, Marsailidh M.
name: Berkhout, Augustinus J. C.
name: Cowan, Nicholas
name: Crunaire, Sabine
name: Dammers, Enrico
name: Ebert, Volker
name: Gaudion, Vincent
name: Haaima, Marty
name: Häni, Christoph
name: John, Lewis
name: Jones, Matthew R.
name: Kamps, Bjorn
name: Kentisbeer, John
name: Kupper, Thomas
name: Leeson, Sarah R.
name: Leuenberger, Daiana
name: Lüttschwager, Nils O. B.
name: Makkonen, Ulla
name: Martin, Nicholas A.
name: Missler, David
name: Mounsor, Duncan
name: Neftel, Albrecht
name: Nelson, Chad
name: Nemitz, Eiko
name: Oudwater, Rutger
name: Pascale, Celine
name: Petit, Jean-Eudes
name: Pogany, Andrea
name: Redon, Nathalie
name: Sintermann, Jörg
name: Stephens, Amy
name: Sutton, Mark A.
name: Tang, Yuk S.
name: Zijlmans, Rens
name: Braban, Christine F.
name: Niederhauser, Bernhard
Publisher: name: Copernicus
Year: 2022

description: Ammonia (NH3) in the atmosphere affects both the environment and human health. It is therefore increasingly recognised by policy makers as an important air pollutant that needs to be mitigated, though it still remains unregulated in many countries. In order to understand the effectiveness of abatement strategies, routine NH3 monitoring is required. Current reference protocols, first developed in the 1990s, use daily samplers with offline analysis; however, there have been a number of technologies developed since, which may be applicable for high time resolution routine monitoring of NH3 at ambient concentrations. The following study is a comprehensive field intercomparison held over an intensively managed grassland in southeastern Scotland using currently available methods that are reported to be suitable for routine monitoring of ambient NH3. In total, 13 instruments took part in the field study, including commercially available technologies, research prototype instruments, and legacy instruments. Assessments of the instruments' precision at low concentrations (&lt; 10 ppb) and at elevated concentrations (maximum reported concentration of 282 ppb) were undertaken. At elevated concentrations, all instruments performed well and with precision (r2 &gt; 0.75). At concentrations below 10 ppb, however, precision decreased, and instruments fell into two distinct groups, with duplicate instruments split across the two groups. It was found that duplicate instruments performed differently as a result of differences in instrument setup, inlet design, and operation of the instrument. New metrological standards were used to evaluate the accuracy in determining absolute concentrations in the field. A calibration-free CRDS optical gas standard (OGS, PTB, DE) served as an instrumental reference standard, and instrument operation was assessed against metrological calibration gases from (i) a permeation system (ReGaS1, METAS, CH) and (ii) primary standard gas mixtures (PSMs) prepared by gravimetry (NPL, UK). This study suggests that, although the OGS gives good performance with respect to sensitivity and linearity against the reference gas standards, this in itself is not enough for the OGS to be a field reference standard, because in field applications, a closed path spectrometer has limitations due to losses to surfaces in sampling NH3, which are not currently taken into account by the OGS. Overall, the instruments compared with the metrological standards performed well, but not every instrument could be compared to the reference gas standards due to incompatible inlet designs and limitations in the gas flow rates of the standards. This work provides evidence that, although NH3 instrumentation have greatly progressed in measurement precision, there is still further work required to quantify the accuracy of these systems under field conditions. It is the recommendation of this study that the use of instruments for routine monitoring of NH3 needs to be set out in standard operating protocols for inlet setup, calibration, and routine maintenance in order for datasets to be comparable.