MOESM1 of Detection of small crustal deformation caused by slow slip events in southwest Japan using GNSS and tremor data
Creators: name: Fujita, Megumi
name: Nishimura, Takuya
name: Shin’ichi Miyazaki
Publisher: name: figshare
Year: 2019
Subjects: subject: Biochemistry
subject: Medicine
subject: Genetics
subject: FOS: Biological sciences
subject: FOS: Biological sciences
subject: Molecular Biology
subject: 59999 Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified
subject: FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences
subject: FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences
subject: Ecology
subject: 69999 Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
subject: 19999 Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified
subject: FOS: Mathematics
subject: FOS: Mathematics
subject: Developmental Biology
subject: Computational Biology

description: Additional file 1: Figure S1. Daily tremor energy and GNSS time series. We use the same color in this figure as in Fig. 2. (a), (b) Daily sum of tremor energy in segment II and III, respectively. (c), (d) Displacement increments categorized into stable and release period for NS component at station 950435 in segment II and station 950445 in segment III, respectively. (e), (f) GNSS time series before rearrangement for NS component at station 950435 and station 950445, respectively. (g), (h) Same as (c) and (d), but for EW component. (i), (j) Same as (e) and (f), but for EW component. Figure S2. Release velocities between April 1, 2004 and December 31, 2009 with a tremor energy threshold of 0.05 × 107 J in all segments. We use the same symbols in this figure as in Fig. 3. Figure S3. Space-time plot of short-term SSEs along the Nankai Trough, in the NIED catalog during our analysis period. The vertical axis indicates the distance from the lower left point of segment I (Fig. 1) in the strike direction of N38°E. Gray horizontal lines show the boundaries of the segments. Pink lines show SSE faults in the NIED catalog. Figure S4. Space-time plot of short-term SSEs along the Nankai Trough, detected by Nishimura et al. (2013) during our analysis period. The vertical axis and gray horizontal lines are the same as in Figure S3. The horizontal axis indicates the middle days of SSE period. Pink lines show SSE faults estimated by Nishimura et al. (2013). Blue lines show the timing of release period in each segment with a tremor energy threshold of 0.05 × 107 J. Figure S5. All the ‘well-fitted models’ in segment I. We use the same symbols in this figure as in Fig. 6. It is notable that the scale of orange arrows is different from that of pink arrows. Figures (a)–(l) are rearranged in descending order of residual reductions in the fault estimation. Figure S6. All the ‘well-fitted models’ in segment II. We use the same symbols in this figure as in Additional file 1: Figure S5. Figures (a)–(i) are rearranged in descending order of residual reductions in the fault estimation. Figure S7. All the ‘well-fitted models’ in segment III. We use the same symbols in this figure as in Additional file 1: Figure S5. Figures (a)–(k) are rearranged in descending order of residual reductions in the fault estimation. Figure S8. Relation between the daily moment per unit length of the estimated fault and the average of daily tremor energy during the release period in each segment when we changed the tremor energy threshold from 0.05 × 107 J to 3.00 × 107 J every 0.05 × 107 J. Small red, blue, green, and purple dots indicate segments I, II, III, and IV respectively. Large dots are the same in Fig. 7. Figure S9. Correlation coefficients when we changed the number of data used in the calculation in descending order of residual reductions in the fault estimation in each segment. Red, blue, green dots indicate segments I, II, and III, respectively.