Evaluacion economica de una vacunacion protectora contra el riesgo de enfermedades contagiosas del ganado
Creators: name: Meuwissen, Miranda P.M.
name: Van Asseldonk, Marcel
name: Mouritis, Monique
name: Huirne, Ruud
name: Meuwissen, Miranda P.M.
name: Van Asseldonk, Marcel
name: Mouritis, Monique
name: Huirne, Ruud
Publisher: name: Unknown
Year: 2009
Subjects: subject: Agricultural and Food Policy
subject: Food Security and Poverty
subject: Health Economics and Policy
subject: Marketing
subject: FOS: Economics and business
subject: Risk and Uncertainty
subject: perdidas de mercado
subject: agrupacion de riesgos
subject: fiebre aftosa
subject: vacunacion de urgencia
subject: modelo de simulacion
subject: juicios de experto
subject: market losses
subject: risk pooling
subject: foot and mouth disease
subject: suppressive vaccination
subject: simulation modeling
subject: expert judgement

description: En recientes epizootias occuridas en los Paises Bajos, muchos animales sanos hubieron de ser sacrificados y se solicito a los responsables politicos impulsaran un plan de vacunacion para prevenir futuros brotes. No obstante, se tiene poca experiencia sobre la eficacia de la administracion de vacunas protectoras. Las consecuencias sobre el mercado de la venta de productos procedentes de animales vacunas protectoras. Las consecuencias sobre el mercardo de la venta de productos procedentes de animales vacunados son muy inciertas, y no estan cubiertas por ningun plan de financiacion del riesgo. En este articulo se cuantifican las consecuencias epidemiologicas y economicas de la vacunacion protectora de epizootias de fiebre aftosa en los Paises Bajos empleando un modelo de evaluacion economica. Los resultados indican que los costes veterinarios y las perdidas por interrupcion del negocio probablemente disminuyan con la vacunacion preventiva frente al sacrificio de urgencia en casi un 75 por ciento y un 95 por ciento, respectivamente. No obstante, es probable tambien que las perdidas de mercado aumenten en casi un 20 por ciento, dada la importancia de las cadenas de suministro de carne de cerdo y ternaera blanca, que se suministran en gran medida de explotaciones con animales vacunacion, las perdidas de mercado son apartentemente las mas dificiles de compartir, y podrian requerir algun tipo de contrato para compartir el riesgo entre el sector publico y el privado para poner en practica las companas de vacunacion protectora...Recent livestock epidemics in the Netherlands, during which many healthy animals were destructed, urged policy makers to opt for protective vaccination for future epidemics. However, little experience is available with regard to the effectiveness of applying emergency vaccination, and market consequences of selling products from vaccinated animals are highly uncertain and not covered by any risk financing scheme. This paper quantifies the epidemicological and economic impact of protective vaccination for foot and mouth disease epidemics in the Netherlands. Results show that veterinary costs and business interruption losses are likely to decrease in case of protective vaccination compared to stamping-out, i.e. by about 75 percent and 95 percent respectively. Market losses however are likely to increase by about 20 percent, mainly on the account of pork and white veal supply chains and with a relatively large share for vaccinated farms. From the various damage components considered, market losses seem to be most difficult to pool and some form of public-private risk-sharing agreement might be needed to actually implement protective vaccination in practice.