Ammonia emissions from a dairy housing and wastewater treatment plant quantified with an inverse dispersion method accounting for deposition loss
Creators: name: Valach, Alex C.
name: Häni, Christoph
name: Bühler, Marcel
name: Mohn, Joachim
name: Schrade, Sabine
name: Kupper, Thomas
Publisher: name: Taylor & Francis
Year: 2023
Subjects: subject: Biophysics
subject: Biochemistry
subject: Pharmacology
subject: Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified
subject: Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified
subject: Ecology
subject: FOS: Biological sciences
subject: Sociology
subject: FOS: Sociology
subject: Hematology
subject: Plant Biology

description: Ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) emissions negatively impact air, soil, and water quality, hence human health and biodiversity. Significant emissions, including the largest sources, originate from single or multiple structures, such as livestock facilities and wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The inverse dispersion method (IDM) is effective in measuring total emissions from such sources, although depositional loss between the source and point of measurement is often not accounted for. We applied IDM with a deposition correction to determine total emissions from a representative dairy housing and WWTP during several months in autumn and winter in Switzerland. Total emissions were 1.19 ± 0.48 and 2.27 ± 1.53 kg NH<sub>3</sub> d<sup>−1</sup> for the dairy housing and WWTP, respectively, which compared well with literature values, despite the paucity of WWTP data. A concurrent comparison with an inhouse tracer ratio method at the dairy housing indicated an offset of the IDM emissions by &lt; 20%. Diurnal emission patterns were evident at both sites mostly driven by changes in air temperature with potential lag effects such as following sludge agitation. Modeled deposition corrections to adjust the concentration loss detected at the measurement point with the associated footprint were 22–28% of the total emissions and the cumulative fraction of deposition to emission modeled with distance from the source was between 7% and 12% for the measurement distances (60–150 m). Although estimates of depositional loss were plausible, the approach is still connected with substantial uncertainty, which calls for future validation measurements. Longer measurement periods encompassing more management activities and environmental conditions are required to assess predictor variable importance on emission dynamics. Combined, IDM with deposition correction will allow the determination of emission factors at reduced efforts and costs, thereby supporting the development and assessment of emission reducing methods and expand the data availability for emission inventories. <i>Implications</i>: Ammonia emissions must be measured to determine emission factors and reporting national inventories. Measurements from structures like farms and industrial plants are complex due to the many different emitting surfaces and the building configuration leading to a poor data availability. Micrometeorological methods provide high resolution emission data from the entire structure, but suffer from uncertainties, as the instruments must be placed at a distance from the structure resulting in a greater loss of the emitted ammonia via dry deposition before it reaches the measurement. This study constrains such emission measurements from a dairy housing and wastewater treatment plant by applying a simple correction to account for the deposition loss and compares the results to other methods.