A política de avaliação da qualidade da educação superior no Brasil
Creators: name: Dotta, Alexandre Godoy
Publisher: name: figshare
Year: 2020
Subjects: subject: 130103 Higher Education
subject: FOS: Educational sciences
subject: FOS: Educational sciences
subject: 160506 Education Policy
subject: FOS: Political science
subject: FOS: Political science
subject: 160809 Sociology of Education
subject: FOS: Sociology
subject: FOS: Sociology

description: The text has its problems centered on the issue of quality of higher education. It provides a reflection on the implementation process of the evaluation of policies of higher education in Brazil, especially those involving the issue of quality of courses and institutions. Guided by the question: how effective have been public policy for evaluating the quality of higher education in Brazil to promote human development? The research is developed from the concept of Pierre Bourdieu's field, therefore seeks to identify the key players establishing the rationale for the quality setting for public policy education. Demarcates the constitution of the field of higher education pointing the birth of the first courses and main institutions. Performs a historical description of the evaluation of policies of higher education in Brazil. It presents the groups' reports , programs and commission for the promotion of policies for higher education , notably GTRU (Working Group of the University Reform – Grupo de Trabalho da Reforma Universitária), PARU (Program Evaluation and University Reform – Programa de Avaliação e Reforma Universitária), CNRES (National Commission for the Reform of Higher Education – Comissão Nacional para a Reforma do Ensino Superior),GERES (Executive Group for the Reformulation of University Reform – Grupo Executivo para a Reformulação da Reforma Universitária), PAIUB (Institutional Evaluation Programme of Brazilian Universities – Programa de Avaliação Institucional das Universidades Brasileiras), ENC (National Examination Courses – Exame Nacional de Cursos), CEA (Special Committee on Higher Education Evaluation – Comissão Especial de Avaliação da Educação Superior) and finally the SINAES (National Higher Education Evaluation System – Sistema Nacional de Avaliação da Educação Superior). Analyzes the ENADE (National Examination of Student Performance – Exame Nacional de Desempenho dos Estudantes) and points to the emergence of quality of undergraduate courses indicators: ENADE, IDD (Difference indicator between Observed and Expected Performances – Indicador de Diferença entre os Desempenhos Observados e Esperados) and CPC (Concept Preliminary Course – Conceito Preliminar de Curso). Does weighting of the overall result of the evaluations of courses from nine editions of ENADE, which correspond to three (3) rounds of three (3) years , made between 2004 and 2012. Especially on the third cycle (2010-2012 ) is a performance study on ENADE of IES and courses for administrative category: public or private, and academic organization: college, university and university-center. Concludes the analysis highlighting the permanence of the aspects that comprise a conservative approach for assessing the quality of higher education at the expense of a transformative approach. Shows the main changes between the proposed evaluation policy of the CEA and the evaluative policy implemented by SINAES that made it impossible to execute a focused assessment for