Juncus tweedyi Rydberg 1900
Creators: name: Knapp, Wesley M.
name: Gandhi, Kanchi
name: Naczi, Robert F. C.
name: Floden, Aaron
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Plantae
Tracheophyta
Liliopsida
Poales
Juncaceae
Juncus
Juncus tweedyi

description: Juncus tweedyi Rydberg (1900: 90).
Lectotype (designated here): — U.S.A. Yellowstone Nat. Park, 1884, F. Tweedy 223 (US!01014093 (specimen on left side of sheet), image available at http://n 2t.net/ark:/65665/m36ba492d8-ad74-40fb-a425-87f165d9c396)
= Juncus canadensis var. brevicaudatus Engelmann (1866: 436)
= Juncus brevicaudatus (Engelmann) Fernald (1904: 35)
Lectotype (here designated): — U.S.A., Massachusetts, Houghtons Pond, Milton, 8 September 1853, W. Boot GH [00339972].
= Juncus canadensis var. coarctatus Engelmann (1867: 544);
= Juncus coarctatus (Engelmann) Buchenau (1906: 160).
= Juncus canadensis var. kuntzei Buchenau (1890: 272).
Lectotype (here designated): — U.S.A., Utah, “Die var. Kuntzeiwurde von Dr. O. Kuntze an der Pacificbahnbei Corinne in einer Hoehe Type von ca. 7000 FuBgefunden”: NY! [NY247586].
Notes:—The holotype of Juncus tweedyi was cited as being at NY by Kirschner (2002) but searches for this specimen have not been successful. The general collections of Juncus at NY contain a folder for J. tweedyi that states “see type collection”, however only an empty folder in the type collections of NY in the correct alphabetic range was found. No digital record or image exists for this type. It is possible that the specimen has been misfiled or lost.
A specimen annotated by Tiehm in 1984 as the holotype of Juncus tweedyi at YU is not correct. This specimen, Tweedy 225, is cited by Rydberg (1900) as J. nevadensis and the type of J. tweedyi is Tweedy 223. The only specimen we have found that matches Rydberg’s cited collection number is at US. This specimen cannot be the holotype as its label lacks the original annotation by Rydberg. Given that no other specimen of Tweedy 223 has been found, we here lectotypify the name J. tweedyi with the US specimen.
The typification of J. brevicaudatus is complex. Kirschner (2002) cited the following:
Juncus canadensis var. brevicaudatus Engelmann, Trans.Acad. Sci. St. Louis 2: 436 (1866); J.canadensis var. coarctatus Engelmann, in A.Gray, Manual, ed. 5, 544 (1867) and Engelmann, Trans. Acad. Sci. St. Louis 2: 474 (1868); J. coarctatus (Engelmann) Buchenau, in H.G.A. Engler, Pflanzenr. (iv.) 36: 160 (1906). T: Ontario: Isle of St. Ignace, Lake Superior, 9 Aug 1866, O.B. Wheeler [G. Engelmann, Herb. Junc. Bor.- Amer. Norm.] 76; lecto, MO; designated here by S.E. Clemants; isolecto: NY, PR.
This above typification is incorrect. Although Engelmann (1866) did not provide a description or diagnosis for his varietal name Juncus canadensis var. brevicaudatus, he did refer to a description. Engelmann’s treatment shows “[var.] a. brevicaudatus (J. acuminatus, Gray)”. In other words, it is evident that Engelmann (1866) considered Gray’s (1859) treatment of “ J. acuminatus Michx. ” as a misapplication and cited “ J. acuminatus sensu A. Gray (1859, non Michx., 1803)” as a synonym; he thus referred to Gray’s description. It is emphasized here that the basis for the validity of the varietal name J. canadensis var. brevicaudatus is Engelmann’s reference to Gray’s description of “ J. acuminatus ”. As per the Shenzhen Code Art.7.8., “A name of a new taxon validly published solely by reference to a previously and effectively published description or diagnosis (Art. 38.1(a)) … is to be typified by an element selected from the entire context of the validating description or diagnosis …”. Therefore, the varietal name J. canadensis var. brevicaudatus must be typified by an element selected from Gray’s (1859: 480) treatment of “ J. acuminatus ”. Gray, however, merely provided distributional range as “Mountains, Maine, W. Massachusetts, N. New York and northward”; he did not cite any collection. Nevertheless, pre-1859 collection(s) from any of the preceding areas, housed at GH and identifiable as J. canadensis var. brevicaudatus, is eligible for the typification of this varietal name.
description: Published as part of Knapp, Wesley M., Gandhi, Kanchi, Naczi, Robert F. C. & Floden, Aaron, 2022, Juncus tweedyi (Juncaceae sect. Ozophyllum), the correct name for Juncus brevicaudatus, pp. 242-244 in Phytotaxa 566 (2) on page 243, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.566.2.9, http://zenodo.org/record/7119242