Clinical assessment and patient-reported outcome measures in low-back pain – a survey among primary health care physiotherapists
Creators: name: Östhols, Sara
name: Boström, Carina
name: Rasmussen-Barr, Eva
Publisher: name: Taylor & Francis
Year: 2018
Subjects: subject: Space Science
subject: Medicine
subject: Pharmacology
subject: Biotechnology
subject: 39999 Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified
subject: FOS: Chemical sciences
subject: FOS: Chemical sciences
subject: Science Policy
subject: Sociology
subject: FOS: Sociology
subject: FOS: Sociology
subject: Cancer
subject: 111714 Mental Health
subject: FOS: Health sciences
subject: FOS: Health sciences
subject: 110309 Infectious Diseases

description: <b>Purpose:</b> We aimed to map the physiotherapy practice in Sweden of clinical tests and patient-reported outcome measures in low-back pain (LBP), and to study advantages and barriers in using patient-reported outcome measures. <b>Methods:</b> An online survey was mailed to 4934 physiotherapists in primary health care in Sweden. Multiple choice questions investigated the use of clinical tests and patient-reported outcome measures in assessing patients with LBP. Open questions investigating the advantages and barriers to the use of patient-reported outcome measures were analyzed with content analysis. <b>Results:</b> The response rate was 25% (<i>n</i> = 1217). Clinical tests were used “always/often” by &gt;60% of the participants, while most patient-reported outcome measures were used by &lt;15%. Advantages in using patient-reported outcome measures were: the clinical reasoning process, to increase the quality of assessment, to get the patient’s voice, education and motivation of patients, and communication with health professionals. Barriers were lack of time and knowledge, administrative aspects, the interaction between physiotherapist and patient and, the applicability and validity of the patient-reported outcome measures. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our findings show that physiotherapists working in primary health care use clinical testing in LBP to a great extent, while various patient-reported outcome measures are used to a low-to-very-low extent. Several barriers to the use of patient-reported outcome measures were reported such as time, knowledge, and administrative issues, while important findings on advantages were to enhance the clinical reasoning process and to educate and motivate the patient. Barriers might be changed through education or organizational change-work. To enhance the use of patient-reported outcome measures and thus person-centered care in low-back pain, recommendation, and education on various patient-reported outcome measures need to be advocated.Implications for rehabilitationTo increase the effects of rehabilitation in low-back pain, yellow flags, and other factors need to be taken into the consideration in the assessment which means the use of patient-reported outcome measures in addition to clinical testing.The use of patient-reported outcome measures is an advantage in the clinical reasoning process to enhance the quality of assessment and to educate and motivate the patient.Barriers to use patient-reported outcome measures are mainly lack of time and knowledge, and administrative aspects.Through education or organizational change-work, barriers to the use of patient-reported outcome measures might be changed. To increase the effects of rehabilitation in low-back pain, yellow flags, and other factors need to be taken into the consideration in the assessment which means the use of patient-reported outcome measures in addition to clinical testing. The use of patient-reported outcome measures is an advantage in the clinical reasoning process to enhance the quality of assessment and to educate and motivate the patient. Barriers to use patient-reported outcome measures are mainly lack of time and knowledge, and administrative aspects. Through education or organizational change-work, barriers to the use of patient-reported outcome measures might be changed.