Additional file 1 of Impacts of dual active-ingredient bed nets on the behavioural responses of pyrethroid resistant Anopheles gambiae determined by room-scale infrared video tracking
Creators: name: Gleave, Katherine
name: Guy, Amy
name: Mechan, Frank
name: Emery, Mischa
name: Murphy, Annabel
name: Voloshin, Vitaly
name: Towers, Catherine E.
name: Towers, David
name: Ranson, Hilary
name: Foster, Geraldine M.
name: McCall, Philip J.
Publisher: name: figshare
Year: 2023
Subjects: subject: Medicine
subject: Biotechnology
subject: 59999 Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified
subject: FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences
subject: 39999 Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified
subject: FOS: Chemical sciences
subject: Ecology
subject: FOS: Biological sciences
subject: Immunology
subject: FOS: Clinical medicine
subject: 69999 Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
subject: Cancer
subject: 110309 Infectious Diseases
subject: FOS: Health sciences

description: Additional file 1: Table S1. Mean 24hour mortality [95% CI]. Resistant mosquito strains are denoted in italics. Table S2. Mean 24hour mortality comparisons between three insecticide treated nets and four mosquito strains, two susceptible (Kisumu and N’gousso) and two resistant (VK7 and Banfora). Resistant mosquito strains are denoted in italics. Table S3. Comparison of median survival times of susceptible (Kisumu and N’gousso) and resistant (VK7 and Banfora) strains on four different net treatments. Resistant mosquito strains are denoted in italics. Table S4. Statistically significant differences (p values) in total activity time split into four different behavioural modes (swooping, visiting, bouncing and resting), comparing untreated (UT) net to either Olyset Net (OL), PermaNet 3.0 (P3) or Interceptor G2 (IG2), for susceptible (Kisumu and N’gousso) and resistant (VK7 and Banfora) mosquitoes. Resistant mosquito strains are denoted in italics. Table S5. Within strain comparisons (p-value) of total activity time split into four different behavioural modes (swooping, visiting, bouncing and resting) between three ITNs (Olyset Net = OL, PermaNet 3.0 = P3, Interceptor G2 = IG2). Resistant mosquito strains are denoted in italics. Table S6. Within treatment comparisons (p-value) of total activity split into four behavioural modes (swooping, visiting, bouncing and resting) on four ITNs (Untreated net = UT, Olyset Net = OL, PermaNet 3.0 = P3, Interceptor G2 = IG2) between four mosquito strains. Resistant mosquito strains are denoted in italics. Table S7. Mean total number of bed net contacts [95% CI], mean total contact duration [95% CI] and maximum number of mosquitoes seen in one frame of video recording. Resistant mosquito strains are denoted in italics. Table S8. Within strain statistical comparisons (p value) of total number of net contacts for susceptible (Kisumu and N’gousso) and resistant (VK7 and Banfora) mosquitoes between four nets (UT = untreated, OL = Olyset Net, P3 = PermaNet 3.0, IG2 = Interceptor G2). Resistant mosquito strains are denoted in italics. Table S9. Within treatment statistical comparisons (p value) of total number of net contacts for four nets between four mosquito strains. Resistant mosquito strains are denoted in italics. Table S10. Within strain comparisons (p-value) of total duration of net contact for susceptible (Kisumu and N’gousso) and resistant (VK7 and Banfora) mosquitoes between three ITNs (OL = Olyset Net, P3 = PermaNet 3.0, IG2 = Interceptor G2). Resistant mosquito strains are denoted in italics. Table S11. Within treatment comparison (p-value) of total net contact duration for three ITNs between four mosquito strains. Resistant mosquito strains are denoted in italics. Table S12. Percentage of contact duration in first the 10 minutes of room scale tracking assay – within strain, between net differences. Resistant mosquito strains are denoted in italics. Table S13. Percentage of contact duration in first 10mins of assay – within net, between strain differences Resistant mosquito strains are denoted in italics. Table S14. Average contact duration in first 10 minutes—within strain, between net comparisons. Resistant mosquito strains are denoted in italics. Table S15. Average contact duration in first 10minutess – within net, between strain comparisons. Resistant mosquito strains are denoted in italics. Table S16. Comparison (p-value) of average swooping speeds across 2hour assay within four different strains, between four different net treatments. Resistant mosquito strains are denoted in italics. Table S17. Comparison of average swooping speeds across 2hour assay within four net treatments, between four strains. Resistant mosquito strains are denoted in italics. Table S18. Comparison of activity decay over time (p-value), within strain, between net treatment. Resistant mosquito strains are denoted in italics. Table S19. Comparison of activity decay over time (p-value), within net treatment, between strains. Resistant mosquito strains are denoted in italics.