Papers in Philippine Linguistics No. 10
Creators: name: Gallman, A. (Ed.)
name: Allison, E. (Ed.)
name: Harmon, C. (Ed.)
name: Witucki, J. (Ed.)
Publisher: name: Pacific Linguistics
Year: 1979

description: A-55
description: Contents iii{Andrew F. Gallman.} 1PROTO-SOUTH-EAST MINDANAO AND ITS INTERNAL RELATIONSHIPS. 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Purpose 1 1.2. Previous Classifications 1 1.3. Geography 4 1.4. Source of Data 5 1.5. Abbreviations 5 2. THE PHONEMIC SYSTEMS IN PSEM 6 2.1. The Phonemic Systems of the SEM Languages 6 2.1.1. The Consonants 6 2.1.2. The Vowels 8 2.2. The Phonemic System of Proto-South-Eastern-Mindanao 8 2.2.1. Proto-Consonants 9 2.2.1.1. *p 9 2.2.1.2. *t 9 2.2.1.3. *k 9 2.2.1.4. *b 9 2.2.1.5. *d 10 2.2.1.6. *g 10 2.2.1.7. *m 11 2.2.1.8. *n 11 2.2.1.9. *ŋ 11 2.2.1.10. *s 11 2.2.1.11. *l 12 2.2.1.12. *ʔ 13 2.2.1.13. *w 14 2.2.1.14. *y 15 2.2.2. Proto-Vowels 15 2.2.2.1. *a 15 2.2.2.2. *ɨ 15 2.2.2.3. *i 17 2.2.2.4. *u 17 3. THE RELATIONSHIP OF KAMAYO AND DAVAWENYO TO THE SEM LANGUAGES 17 4. RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN THE PSEM GROUP 19 4.1. Lexicostatistical Analysis 19 4.2. Phonological Features 21 4.3. Analysis in Terms of Probabilities 22 4.4. Summary and Conclusions 24 5. RECONSTRUCTION AND COGNATE SETS 25 6. CONCLUSION 26NOTES 46BIBLIOGRAPHY 49{E. Joe Allison} 53PROTO-DANAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MARANAW, MAGINDANAW, AND IRANUN. 1. INTRODUCTION 53 1.1. Purpose 53 1.2. Abbreviations 53 1.3. Previous Classifications 54 1.4. Historical Background 55 2. THE PHONEMIC SYSTEMS 56 2.1. Essential Aspects of MAR, MGD, and IRN Phonologies 56 2.1.1. Consonants 56 2.1.2. Semi-vowels 57 2.1.3. Vowels 58 2.2. The Phonemic System of Proto-Danaw 59 2.2.1. Proto-Consonants 59 2.2.1.1. *p 59 2.2.1.2. *t 59 2.2.1.3. *k 59 2.2.1.4. *b 60 2.2.1.5. *d 60 2.2.1.6. *g 61 2.2.1.7. *m 61 2.2.1.8. *n 61 2.2.1.9. *ŋ 61 2.2.1.10. *s 62 2.2.1.11. *l 62 2.2.1.12. *r 62 2.2.1.13. *ʔ 63 2.2.1.14. *w 63 2.2.1.15. *y 63 2.2.2. Proto-Vowels 64 2.2.2.1. *a 64 2.2.2.2. *ɨ 64 2.2.2.3. *i 65 2.2.2.4. *u 65 3. RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN THE DANAW GROUP 65 3.1. The Subgrouping Hypothesis 65 3.2. Lexicostatistical Analysis 66 3.3. Functor Analysis 66 3.4. Phonological Innovations 69 3.4.1. Phonemic Change in Proto-Danaw 69 3.4.1.1. PDAN *b-*w Merger 69 3.4.1.2. PDAN Loss of Stem-Initial Consonant 70 3.4.2. Phonemic Changes in MAR, MGD, and IRN 71 3.4.2.1. MAR-IRN Vowel Assimilation 71 3.4.2.2. MGD-IRN Glottal Stop Loss 71 3.4.2.3. MGD r-1 Merger 72 3.4.2.4. MAR Consonant Cluster Reduction 72 3.5. Morphological Features 72 3.5.1. Deictics 72 3.5.2. Verbal Affixes 73 3.6. Shared Lexicon 74 3.7. Summary and Conclusions 77 4. RECONSTRUCTIONS AND COGNATE SETS 78 4.1. Proto-Danaw Reconstructions 79 4.2. English Index of Proto-Danaw Reconstructions 91APPENDIX 1. Modified Swadesh 100-meaning List 96APPENDIX 2. Danaw Functor and Qualitative Wordlist 98NOTES 102BIBLIOGRAPHY 108{Carol W. Harmon} 113PROTO-MANOBO PRONOUNS AND CASE MARKING PARTICLES. 1. INTRODUCTION 113 2. PRONOUNS 114 2.1. Independent Nominative 114 2.2. Oblique 116 2.3. Nominative Enclitic 117 2.4. Genitive 118 3. CASE MARKING PARTICLES 122 3.1. Personal Noun Markers 122 3.2. Common Noun Markers 123 4. CONCLUSIONS REGARDING MANOBO INNOVATIONS 125 4.1. Changes From Proto-Austronesian Pronominal Innovations 125 4.2. Intra-Manobo Developments From Proto-Manobo 126NOTES 129BIBLIOGRAPHY 131Table 1 - Manobo Independent Nominative Pronouns 119Table 2 - Manobo Oblique Pronouns 120Table 3 - Manobo Nominative Enclitic Pronouns 120Table 4 - Manobo Genitive Pronouns 121Table 5 - Reconstructions of Manobo Pronouns 121Table 6 - Manobo Case Marking Particles 124Table 7 - Reconstructions of Manobo Case Marking Particles 125{Jeannette Witucki} 135CHAMORRO PREFIXES: I. 1. INTRODUCTION 135 2. KNOWN PREFIXES WITH INITIAL /a/ 135 2.1. /á-/ 136 2.2. /án-/ 136 2.3. /atsá-/ 137 3. FURTHER /a/ INITIAL PREFIXES 137 3.1. /a-/ 137 3.2. /a-/ ~ /ha-/ 138 3.3. /áʔ-/ 139 3.4. /aka-/ 140NOTES 141BIBLIOGRAPHY 142