Examples of best practice in embedding open and reproducible scholarship from Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes
Creators: name: Pownall, Madeleine
name: Azevedo, Flávio
name: König, Laura M.
name: Slack, Hannah R.
name: Evans, Thomas Rhys
name: Flack, Zoe
name: Grinschgl, Sandra
name: Elsherif, Mahmoud M.
name: Gilligan-Lee, Katie A.
name: de Oliveira, Catia M. F.
name: Gjoneska, Biljana
name: Kalandadze, Tamara
name: Button, Katherine
name: Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah
name: Terry, Jenny
name: Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan
name: Děchtěrenko, Filip
name: Alzahawi, Shilaan
name: Baker, Bradley J.
name: Pittelkow, Merle-Marie
name: Riedl, Lydia
name: Schmidt, Kathleen
name: Pennington, Charlotte R.
name: Shaw, John J.
name: Lüke, Timo
name: Makel, Matthew C.
name: Hartmann, Helena
name: Zaneva, Mirela
name: Walker, Daniel
name: Verheyen, Steven
name: Cox, Daniel
name: Mattschey, Jennifer
name: Gallagher-Mitchell, Tom
name: Branney, Peter
name: Weisberg, Yanna
name: Izydorczak, Kamil
name: Al-Hoorie, Ali H.
name: Creaven, Ann-Marie
name: Stewart, Suzanne L. K.
name: Krautter, Kai
name: Matvienko-Sikar, Karen
name: Westwood, Samuel J.
name: Arriaga, Patrícia
name: Liu, Meng
name: Baum, Myriam A.
name: Wingen, Tobias
name: Ross, Robert M.
name: O'Mahony, Aoife
name: Bochynska, Agata
name: Jamieson, Michelle
name: Tromp, Myrthe Vel
name: Yeung, Siu Kit
name: Vasilev, Martin R.
name: Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie
name: Micheli, Leticia
name: Konkol, Markus
name: Moreau, David
name: Bartlett, James E.
name: Clark, Kait
name: Brekelmans, Gwen
name: Gkinopoulos, Theofilos
name: Tyler, Samantha L.
name: Röer, Jan Philipp
name: Ilchovska, Zlatomira G.
name: Madan, Christopher R.
name: Robertson, Olly
name: Iley, Bethan J.
name: Guay, Samuel
name: Sladekova, Martina
name: Sadhwani, Shanu
Publisher: name: The Royal Society
Year: 2023

description: In recent years, the scientific community has called for improvements in the credibility, robustness and reproducibility of research, characterized by increased interest and promotion of open and transparent research practices. While progress has been positive, there is a lack of consideration about how this approach can be embedded into undergraduate and postgraduate research training. Specifically, a critical overview of the literature which investigates how integrating open and reproducible science may influence <i>student outcomes</i> is needed. In this paper, we provide the first critical review of literature surrounding the integration of open and reproducible scholarship into teaching and learning and its associated outcomes in students. Our review highlighted how embedding open and reproducible scholarship appears to be associated with (i) students' <i>scientific literacies</i> (i.e. students’ understanding of open research, consumption of science and the development of transferable skills); (ii) <i>student engagement</i> (i.e. motivation and engagement with learning, collaboration and engagement in open research) and (iii) students' <i>attitudes towards science</i> (i.e. trust in science and confidence in research findings). However, our review also identified a need for more robust and rigorous methods within pedagogical research, including more interventional and experimental evaluations of teaching practice. We discuss implications for teaching and learning scholarship.