Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris 1916
Creators: name: Williams, Bronwyn W.
name: Weaver, Patricia G.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2018
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Ostracoda
Podocopida
Entocytheridae
Sphaeromicola
Sphaeromicola topsenti

description: † * Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris, 1916
1916b Sphaeromicola topsenti n. g. n. sp.—Paris: 307–309 (B, H, T).
1916a Sphaeromicola Topsenti P. Paris. —Paris: 116, lapsus calami (D, H).
1920 Sphaeromicola topsenti P. Paris, 1916.—Paris: 479–485, 486, 487, Fig. 1, Pl. XIX Figs. 17–31, Pl. XX Figs. 32–43, Pl. XXI Figs. 44–50, expanded diagnosis (B, D, H, T).
1925a Sphaeromicola topsenti.—Paris: 449 (C, U).
1925b Sphaeromicola topsenti.—Paris: 454 (E, U).
1926 Sphaeromicola Topsenti Paris. —Jeannel: 112, lapsus calami (D, H).
1926 Sphaeromicola topsenti.—Spandl: 45–46 (D, E, H, U).
1927 Sphaeromicola Topsenti Paris. —Chappuis: 35, 38–40, Figs. 17a, b, 18a, b, lapsus calami (D, E, H, T).
1928 Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris. —Paris: 663 (D).
1930 Sphaeromicola topsenti P. Paris. —Klie: 272, 276 (D, H, R).
1930 Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris. —Stammer: 302 (D, H).
1932 Sphaeromicola topsenti.—Stammer: 589 (R, U).
1934–1938 Sphaeromicola topsenti.—Wolf: 43; according to Hart & Hart (1974) this appears in volume 3 (C, U).
1935 Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris. —Stammer: 94 (D, H).
1937 Sphaeromicola topsenti.—Hubault: 366, 367, 369, 370, 371 (R).
1938 Sphaeromicola topsenti.—Hubault: 11, 16, 18, 19 (R).
1938 topsenti Paris 1916.—Klie: 317, 321 (C, D, H, R).
1939 Sphaeromicola Topsenti Paris. —Wesenberg-Lund: 485, lapsus calami (C, H).
1942b Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris 1916.—Hoff: 65, 66 (C, D, H, T).
1943 Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris, 1916.—Hoff: 281 (C).
1943 Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris. —Remy: 37, 38 (D, H, T).
1943b Sphaeromicola topsenti.— Rioja: 567 (R).
1946 S. Topsenti.—Remy: 7, 9, lapsus calami (R).
1948a S. Topsenti Paris.—Remy: 129, 130, 132, lapsus calami (D, R, T).
1948b S. Topsenti Paris.—Remy: 2–3, lapsus calami (D, E, H).
1948c Sphaeromicola topsenti.—Remy: 44–45 (D, H, U).
1951 Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris. —Kesling: 224–228 (D, E, H).
1951 Sphaeromicola Topsenti Paris. —Remy: 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, lapsus calami (D, H, R).
1951 Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris. — Rioja: 169, 170, 171, 174, 179 (C, R).
1960 Sphaeromicola topsenti.—Delamare-Deboutteville: 658 (H, C, D).
1961 S. topsenti.—Howe: Q300 (C).
1962 Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris 1916.—Hart: 139, 140 (C, D, H).
1964 Sph. topsenti.—Vandel: 303 (C).
1967 Sphaeromicola topsenti.—Hart, Nair & Hart: 5 (E, R).
1967 Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris. —Illies: 171 (D).
1968 Sphaeromicola topsenti P. Paris, 1916.—Roelofs: 42 (E).
1971 Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris, 1916:307.—Hobbs Jr.: 5 [as Sphaeoromicola topsenti Paris (1920), erroneous spelling and erroneous authority], 45, 55 (C, D, K).
1971a Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris. —Danielopol: 191, 198, 199, 201, Fig. 5D, E (R).
1974 Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris, 1916.—Hart & Hart: 2 [as Sphaeoromicola topsenti Paris (1920), erroneous spelling], 162, 163, 166–167, 220, 238, Pl. XLIV Fig. 6, Pl. LXII (D, E, H, K, T).
1974 Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris, 1916.—Hartmann & Puri: 50 (C).
1975 Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris, 1916.—Hart & Hart: 62 (C, D, H).
1977b Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris. —Danielopol: 22, 24, 34, Fig. 2 (C, D, R).
1985 Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris. —Danielopol & Hart: 56, 57, 59, 60, 63, 65, 66, 67, Figs. 2, 6A, B, 7 [in part, by implication] (C, D, T).
1985 Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris. —Hart et al.: 4, 6 (C, E, R).
1989 Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris, 1916.—Meisch, Wouters & Martens: 46–47 (C, D, H).
1994 S. topsentis.—Danielopol et al.: 121, erroneous spelling (D).
2000 Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris, 1916.—Meisch: 465 [as S phaeromicola topsenti (Paris, 1916), erroneous authority format], 466, 467, 468, 469, Fig. 190 A–J, Fig. 191 A–C (C, D, H, K, R, T).
2005 Sphaeromicola topsenti.—Smith & Kamiya: 217, 218, 221 (E).
2014a Sphaeromicola topsenti Paris, 1916.—Mestre, Monrós & Mesquita-Joanes: 951 (C).
Remarks: Paris appears to have capitalized the species name when derived from a personal name; although
undoutedly deliberate, this is considered an error retrospectively. This naming convention was repeated by several
authors, including Remy. See above remarks for S. hamigera regarding a potential erroneous record for S. topsenti.
description: Published as part of Williams, Bronwyn W. & Weaver, Patricia G., 2018, A historical review of the taxonomy and classification of Entocytheridae (Crustacea: Ostracoda: Podocopida), pp. 1-129 in Zootaxa 4448 (1) on pages 110-111, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4448.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/1444492