Ninetis subtilissima Simon 1890
Creators: name: HUBER, BERNHARD A.
name: VAN HARTEN, ANTONIUS
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2001
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Araneae
Pholcidae
Ninetis
Ninetis subtilissima

description: Ninetis subtilissima Simon, 1890
Figures 1–28
Ninetis subtilissima Simon, 1890: 96. – Simon, 1893: 486–487, figs. 487–489. – Fage, 1912: figs. 3a (copied from Simon, 1893), 134. – Bristowe, 1938: 310, figs. 2, 7 (copied from Fage, 1912, and Simon, 1893). – Huber, 2000: 82, figs. 310–314.
TYPES: About four to five adult female and several juvenile syntypes from Al’Adan, Yemen; no date (E. Simon), in MNHN (10788); with Simon’s handwritten label ‘‘10788 Ninet. subtilissima E.S. Aden!’’, examined (see redescription of this material in Huber, 2000).
DIAGNOSIS: This species is easily distinguished from the two known congeners (N. minuta (Berland) and N. namibiae Huber) by the short, pointed procursus and the shapes of the bulbal projections, the shape of the male cheliceral apophyses, and the shape of the epigynum (fig. 29).
MALE (Ja’ar): Total length 0.9; carapace width 0.45. Leg 1: 2.28 (0.61 + 0.16 + 0.57 + 0.60 + 0.33), tibia 2: 0.47, tibia 3: 0.37, tibia 4: 0.67; tibia 1 l/d: 9.5. Habitus as in figs. 1 and 2 (see also drawings of the very similar N. minuta in Huber, 2000: figs. 315– 318). Prosoma and legs ochre yellow; opisthosoma gray, with white mark above spinnerets and very indistinct darker spots dorsally. Carapace without thoracic furrow (cf. female: fig. 9). Eye pattern as in female (cf. fig. 9); diameter (in µm; ± 3 µm) AME 30, ALE 65, PME 50, PLE 60; distance PME­PME 50, PME­ALE 30. Chelicerae as in figures 5 and 6, with pair of apophyses frontally and very fine stridulatory ridges laterally (fig. 11); cheliceral laminae as in female (cf. fig. 10); cheliceral glands open through pores at slightly modified fields close to tips of fangs (figs. 12, 13). Sternum with small humps near bases of coxae 1. Palps as figures 3 and 4, with simple procursus that is pointed distally, and genital bulb with two processes: embolus dorsally and pointed (slightly hooked) apophysis ventrally; palpal tarsal organ capsulate with small orifice (fig. 15). Legs without spines, without curved hairs, with very few short vertical hairs; ‘‘normal’’ mechanoreceptive hairs of variable shape (e.g., figs. 24, 25); three trichobothria on tibiae, one on metatarsi; trichobothria with simple capsulate basis (fig. 27); retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 58%; tarsus 1 apparently with 5 pseudosegments, barely visible as slightly darker rings in light microscope, but not discernible in SEM (figs. 25, 26). Three tarsal claws: superior claws with about 12 teeth, inferior claw with two teeth (fig. 28). Opisthosoma globular, with long hair dorsally. Three pairs of spinnerets, colulus possibly represented by modified area between ALS (fig. 19); ALS with one widened, one pointed, and several cylindrically shaped spigots (figs. 16, 17); PMS with one pair of cylindrically shaped spigots (fig. 18); PLS without spigots. Anal tubercle with multibranched hairs (fig. 22).
FEMALE (Ja’ar): In general very similar to male. Carapace width 0.48; tibia 1: 0.60. Palpal tarsal organ as in figure 14. Tip of palp with strong spine (fig. 20). Epigynum consisting of posterior plate and large frontal plate with median pocket opening posteriorly (figs. 7, 21, 23); dorsal view as in figure 8. See Huber (2000) for redescription of female syntypes.
BIOLOGY: The specimens from Ja’ar were shaken out of old Sudan grass plants in a garden within the town. The spiders ran rapidly when disturbed and built flimsy webs when kept in glass tubes.
MATERIAL EXAMINED: YEMEN: Al’Adan: Syntypes above. Ja’ar: 1 ♂ 2 ♀, July 11, 1999 (A. van Harten), in American Museum of Natural History (AMNH); same locality and collector, May 15, 2000, 2 ♂ 17 ♀, temporarily in collection of first author (eventually in AMNH).
NOTES: In contrast to the two known congeners (N. minuta (Berland) and N. namibiae Huber), but in agreement with most other ninetines, N. subtilissima has stridulatory ridges on the male chelicerae. However, the striation is extremely fine and difficult to see in light microscopy, and scanning electron micrographs of chelicerae of the other two species have not been made.
The figures herein differ in some respects from Simon’s (1893) figures of the males and from Huber’s (2000) figures of the epigynum. Most notably, the long bulbal apophysis is strongly curved in Simon’s fig. 488, while it is almost straight in the new material. Also, the male cheliceral apophyses seem more slender in Simon’s fig. 489. In general, however, Simon’s illustrations are not reliable tools for species identification. The differences between the epigyna of the females from Ja’ar and the female syntypes are minimal and within the usual range of intraspecific variation. Therefore, we provisionally interpret the differences as resulting from either misdrawing or intraspecific variation, or from both.
description: Published as part of HUBER, BERNHARD A. & VAN HARTEN, ANTONIUS, 2001, Ninetis subtilissima Simon, 1890 (Araneae: Pholcidae): Redescription and SEM Ultrastructure, pp. 1-8 in American Museum Novitates 3336 on pages 2-6, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2001)336<0001:NSSAPR>2.0.CO;2, http://zenodo.org/record/5370748