Genetic parameters and evaluation of mortality and slaughter rate in Holstein and Jersey cows
Creators: name: Haile-Mariam, Mekonnen
name: Khansefid, Majid
name: Axford, Myrna
name: Goddard, ME
name: Pryce, Jennie
Publisher: name: La Trobe
Year: 2024
Subjects: classificationCode: 3009
subject: Veterinary sciences
subject: FOS: Veterinary sciences
classificationCode: 3003
subject: Animal production
classificationCode: 3006
subject: Food sciences

description: The longevity of dairy cattle has economic, animal welfare, and health implications and is influenced by the frequency of mortality on the farm and sale for slaughter. In this study cows removed from the herd due to death or slaughter during the lactation were coded 1 and cows that were not terminated were coded 0. Genetic parameters for mortality rates (MR) and slaughter rates (SR) were estimated for Holstein (H) and Jersey (J) breeds by applying both linear (LM) and threshold (TM) sire models using about 1.2 million H and 286,000 J cows. Estimated breeding values (EBV) for MR and SR were predicted using animal models to assess the opportunity for selection and genetic trends. Cow termination data, recorded between 1990 and 2020 on a voluntary basis by Australian dairy farmers, were analyzed. Cow MR has increased from below 1% in the 1990s to 4.1% and 3.6% in recent years in H and J cows, respectively. Most dead cows (∼36%) left the herd before 120 d of lactation, while cows that were slaughtered left the herd toward the end of the lactation. Using the LM, heritability (h2) estimates for MR were lower (1%) than those for SR (2%–3.5%). When h2 were estimated using a TM, the estimates for both traits varied between 4% and 20%, suggesting that the difference in incidence level is one of the reasons for the difference in the h2 values between MR and SR. Early test-day milk yield (MY) and 305-d MY (305-d MY) have unfavorable genetic correlations (0.32–0.41) with MR in both breeds. The genetic correlations of calving interval with MR were stronger (0.54–0.68) than with SR (0.28–0.45) suggesting that poor fertility can serve as an early indicator of poor cow health that may lead to increased risk of death. High early test-day somatic cell count is genetically associated with increased likelihood of slaughter (0.24–0.46), but not with increased likelihood of death. In H, 305-d protein yield (PY) had the strongest genetic correlation (−0.34 to −0.40) with SR whereas in J, both 305-d PY and fat yield showed high genetic (−0.64 to −0.70) and moderate environmental (−0.35 to −0.37) correlations with SR. The genetic correlation of removal from the herd due to death and slaughter was negative (−0.3) in J and zero in H. Strong selection for improved fertility and survival and less selection emphasis for MY, has led to an improvement in the genetic trend for cow MR in H and the trend in J has stabilized. Although genetic evaluations for cow MR are feasible, the reliabilities of the EBV are low and the level of cow MR in Australia are relatively low compared with similar countries. Therefore, genetic evaluation for survival based on mortality and slaughter data could be sufficient in the current selection circumstances where breeding objectives are broadly defined. Nevertheless, all Australian farmers should be encouraged to continue recording mortality and slaughter data for monitoring of the trends and for future development of genetic evaluations.