Typhlops golyathi Domínguez & Moreno, 2009, sp. nov.
Creators: name: Domínguez, Michel
name: Moreno, Luis V.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2009
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Reptilia
Squamata
Typhlopidae
Typhlops
Typhlops golyathi

description: Typhlops golyathi sp. nov.
(Tables 1, 2; Figs. 1, 2)
Holotype. Male CZACC 4.5385 from Valle de San Vicente, Viñales Municipality, Pinar del Río Province, Cuba, 83º43'00'' N, 22º41'00'' W, 112 m elevation, collected on April 2003 by Roberto Alonso.
Diagnosis. A large species (360 mm maximum SVL) with moderate body size (57.8 TL/MBD) of the T. biminiensis species group that presents more middorsal scales (> 625) than any other West Indian species (Table 1). It also presents a posterior reduction of four longitudinal scale rows, this characteristic is unique among species of the group. The closest species is T. arator. Both species are large Cuban blind snakes, have the same number of scale rows at the anterior part of the body (26) and a greater number of middorsal scales than any other West Indian species (Table 1). Also, both species are distributed to the west of the remaining species of the T. biminiensis species group (Fig. 2). However, the new species can be distinguished from T. arator by its posterior scale row reduction (4 rows vs. 2 rows), total middorsals (> 625 vs. <580), relative tail length (3% vs. 2%), snout and rostral patterns, ocular size (OLM/OW 0.8 vs. 0.5) and sinuosity (0.8 vs. 0.2) (Tables 1, 2).
Character Species
Description. Male with large size (360 mm SVL), 11 mm TA, 371 mm TL, 33.7 TL/TA, moderate body, 4.2 mm ABD, 6.4 mm MBD, 5.3 mm PBD, 3.7 mm TD, 88.3 TL/ABD, 58.0 TL/MBD, 70.0 TL/PBD, 3.0 TA/ TD. Tail with a small apical spine and three scales bordering the vent opening. Head non–distinct from neck and ogival in dorsal view, broader than long (1.06 HWM/HL), narrowing to the apex, 0.89 HWE/HWM and 0.52 HWN/HWM, strongly dorso–ventrally depressed. Snout lightly sharp–pointed, narrow (0.50 IND / HWM) and ogival to rounded head in outline. Rostral broad in dorsal view, broader than long (1.03 RWD1/ RLD2, 0.92 RWD1/RLD1), curved–sided (1.01 RWD2/RWD1), lightly umboed, not flared on anterior apex, nearly parallel–sided midrostrally, with sharp–pointed to rounded posterior apex, almost reaching interocular level, 0.08 mm RED (0.04 RED/RLD2); broad rostral in ventral view, broader than long, without anterior constriction, anteriorly equally as broad as in dorsal view, obliquely–sided with strong posterior constriction near the mouth, 1.90 ((RWD1 + RTL)/TL)*100. Nasal completely divided; subtriangular superior nasal, with shallow concavity in posterior margin and narrowly in contact with anterior margin of the supraocular; broad nostrils, not visible in dorsal view and much closer to rostral margin than preocular margin; short superior nasal suture and nostrils obliquely oriented (45º angle approximately) to the body longitudinal axis in lateral view; inferior nasal suture with a pronounced curve and contacting in the midpoint of second supralabial; nasal–preocular suture coincident with second–third supralabials suture; preocular–ocular suture coincident with third–fourth supralabials suture; postnasal pattern divergent (0.61 PPNW/APNW, 0.63 RWD1/APNW). Single preocular with "S" pattern, twice as wide as long (0.51 RC/PW), smaller than superior nasal and ocular, in contact with second and third supralabials (0.28 mm PSL), sinuous preocular–ocular suture (0.72 PS, 0.79 OS). Polygonal ocular and longer than wide (0.72 OLM/OW); black eyes, 0.28 mm ED, at preocular notch level, 2.63 mm IOD, and distant from the snout, 0.50 SED/HL; postocular located between parietal and fourth supralabial, with straight posterior margin. Frontal similar to supraocular, both slightly longer than postfrontal, interparietal and interoccipital; nuchal similar to the costals; supraocular obliquely oriented (45º angle approximately) to the head midline; two parietals extending towards the head midline and two occipitals nearly transversely oriented to body axis and parietals. Scale posterior borders are sharp–pointed to rounded in frontal, supraocular, interparietal, interoccipital and nuchal; lightly truncated in postfrontal and parietals, and lightly rounded in occipitals. Four supralabials with T–III imbrication pattern; second supralabial 1.5 times the size of first, in contact with nasal superior and lower edge of preocular; third supralabial twice the size of the first, in contact with preocular and lower edge of ocular; fourth supralabial is the largest, more than four times the first, with convex posterior margin. Four infralabials; second lightly larger than first; third twice times the first; fourth infralabial is the largest, 2.5 times the first. Middorsal scale count, 629; 26 scale rows, reducing posteriorly to: 25 scale rows at 29 % TL or 231th middorsal scales level, 24 scale rows at 30 % TL or 235th middorsal scales level, 23 scale rows at 39 % TL or 285th middorsal scales level, and finally to 22 at 42 % TL or 298th middorsal scales level. Dorsocaudals, 20 and ventrocaudals, 22.
and Hedges (2007).
Coloration in alcohol dark brown dorsum and light brown venter. Number of dark brown scale rows (in dorsal view) counted at neck, midbody and before vent levels are seven, 11 and 11, respectively. Whitish snout: rostral, nasals, preocular, anterior portion of frontal, mid–inferior of ocular and postocular, and four supralabials. Tail unspotted along ventral surface.
Etymology. Patronymic of Golyath (Later Latin translated from Hebrew), biblical giant from book 1st Samuel, Old Testament. Name in allusion to the large size of this species.
Natural History. The animal was collected under a stone, during the day. This region reaches 28 – 30 ºC maximum temperature in summer and 14 – 16 ºC minimum temperature in winter. It receives approximately 1 800 mm of annual precipitation (Instituto Cubano de Geodesia y Cartografía, 1978). The vegetation is characterized by semideciduous and evergreen forests, and vegetation complex of “mogote” – peculiar karst mountains called “mogotes” in Spanish, from Western and Central Cuba (Capote and Berazaín, 1984).
Distribution. Typhlops golyathi is known only from the type –locality of Valle de San Vicente, Viñales Municipality, Pinar del Río Province, Cuba (Fig. 2).
description: Published as part of Domínguez, Michel & Moreno, Luis V., 2009, Taxonomy of the Cuban blind snakes (Scolecophidia, Typhlopidae), with the description of a new large species, pp. 59-66 in Zootaxa 2028 on pages 61-63, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.186240