Phase I and II Archaeological Resources Investigations Brindle Lake Dam Replacement Project, Fort Dix Military Reservation, Township of Plumsted, Ocean County, New Jersey
Creators: name: Tetra Tech EC, Inc.
Publisher: name: Tetra Tech EC, Inc.
Year: 2007
Subjects: subject: Plumsted Township
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/75149/plumsted-township
subject: Fort Dix Military Reservation
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/83696/fort-dix-military-reservation
subject: Fort Dix, NJ
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/83618/fort-dix-nj
subject: Brindle Lake Dam
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/83606/brindle-lake-dam
subject: New Jersey (State / Territory)
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/1367/new-jersey-state-territory
subject: Ocean (County)
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/44391/ocean-county
subject: Prehistoric
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/temporal-keyword/53/prehistoric
subject: 17th-20th century
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/temporal-keyword/6604/17th-20th-century
subject: Historic
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/culture-keyword/25/historic
subject: Late Archaic
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/culture-keyword/11/late-archaic
subject: 28-Oc-152
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/94530/28-oc-152
subject: Building Foundation
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/1677/building-foundation
subject: Archaeological Feature
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/339/archaeological-feature
subject: Artifact Scatter
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/340/artifact-scatter
subject: Shell
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/14/shell
subject: Ceramic
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/1/ceramic
subject: Fauna
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/4/fauna
subject: Glass
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/6/glass
subject: Building Materials
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/8/building-materials
subject: Metal
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/11/metal
subject: Poplar Island Projectile Point
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/2411/poplar-island-projectile-point
subject: Smoking Pipe
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/2539/smoking-pipe
subject: PHASE I, II
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/other-keyword/139088/phase-i-ii
subject: Archeological Resources Investigation
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/other-keyword/159016/archeological-resources-investigation
subject: Brindle Lake Dam Replacement Project
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/other-keyword/159017/brindle-lake-dam-replacement-project
subject: Archaeological Overview
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/1/archaeological-overview
subject: Historic Background Research
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/18/historic-background-research
subject: Heritage Management
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/24/heritage-management
subject: Site Evaluation / Testing
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/10/site-evaluation-testing
subject: Systematic Survey
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/12/systematic-survey

description: Tetra Tech EC, Inc. (TtEC), conducted a Phase I and II archeological survey of the project area for the proposed replacement of Brindle Lake Dam, under contract to Fort Dix. The structure is a low earth dam on Brindletown Creek on the Fort Dix Military Reservation in the Township of Plumsted, Ocean County, New Jersey. The project’s area of potential effects (APE) covers an area of 5.5 acres (2.3 hectares) and includes the dam, two laydown areas, and access roads. A portion of the project area had previously been surveyed during a planning-level study of Fort Dix in 2003 to 2004. That survey identified a mid- to late nineteenth century site, 28-OC-152, which includes the proposed North Laydown Area. An evaluation of the archeological evidence concluded that, pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 USC 470f), the project will have no effect on significant historic properties. No additional archeological study is recommended. This is a final report.