Causality and Logical Consequence
Creators: name: Meta, Seremonia
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2024

description: CAUSALITY & LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE

WHY IS LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE NECESSARY, AND NOT CAUSE-EFFECT❓❌Without cause and effect, we cannot proceed to logical consequences.So, we need to prepare (understand - trace) the cause and effect first to establish a suitable communication network.Cause and effect can help us adapt to circumstances so that the connection network can be established in different situations.After observing (making connections) relevant cause and effect relationships (according to needs), then (logical consequences help) we can create communication or monitor situations far away accurately (through the logical consequences of cause and effect relationships)PHILOSOPHIZE GENUINELYSo, genuine philosophizing goes beyond just reasoning cause and effect.It's not limited to empirical or what is said to be "this makes sense, scientific," which is actually just reasoning cause and effect.But philosophize, think, or more broadly, reason beyond the limits of cause and effect.🔰 START A NEW PHILOSOPHICAL PARADIGM - PHILOSOPHY WITH LOGICAL CONSEQUENCES.

FOUNDATION OF CAUSE AND EFFECTWhy do logical consequences underlie cause and effect? Why are logical consequences behind cause and effect? Isn't cause and effect the foundation of all occurrences?👉 Because logically, cause and effect are stages in the process, so they need a place as the foundation of the process.✅ Cause and effect are sequences of events, but they forget that behind the sequence of events, there is a floor that serves as the venue for the process to take placeLOGICAL CONSEQUENCE AMBIGUITY ❓ Overlapping Interpretation IssuesEven though the cause implies logical consequences, or the logical consequences depend on the cause, it seems that the logical consequences are inconsistent❓Remember, many things we understand overlap in meaning because two meanings are similar, making them appear as one meaning, even though they are different.Example: if hit, the logical consequence is pain. This is not a logical consequence, even though it is commonly expressed that way.When a stone is hit, it doesn't hurt like a human. There are situations where a blow doesn't cause pain.Or "if you're rude, the consequence is that he can get angry." However, the logical consequence is not just a tendency, or not a probability of getting angry.Because if the logical consequence still falls under the probability category, where is the certainty?Without certainty, all probabilities can surpass impossible limits.For example, when possibilities can go in any direction, this affirms the absence of certainty, meaning the unreasonable becomes reasonable, the reasonable becomes unreasonable, and there is no recognizable pattern.Nothing can be formulated because✅ PROBABILITIES MUST BE BASED ON CERTAINTY. AND FROM CERTAINTY, PROBABILITIES CAN ARISE AS POSSIBILITIES.👉 Like the certainty of numbers that produces (probabilities) combinations of numbers.This means that, no matter how shallow or deep, from classical physics limits to quantum physics limits, or even deeper, there must be a certainty limit that serves as its foundation. THAT IS THE LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE THAT IS NOT CAUSE-EFFECT, NOT PROBABILITY.SIMPLY...✅ ... There is probability and its underlying factor, which is certainty.⭕️ Whether called consequences, risks, logical consequences, or any term, the key is that something underlies probability, and that (once again) is certainty.WE JUST NEED TO SEE THE DISTINCTION WITH CAUSE AND EFFECT.CAUSE AND EFFECT & LOGICAL CONSEQUENCESCAUSE AND EFFECT IS A PROCESS, SO THERE ARE STAGES, AND THERE IS ROOM TO FILL IN A PROCESS.Cause and effect manifest diversity; cause and effect need space to process.Space precedes the process, even encompasses the process.The cause becomes the origin for its effect. If there is no cause, there is no effect.That space is the cause underlying the continuation of the cause-and-effect process.No space, no cause-and-effect process, so the main cause of cause and effect must have existed before its cause and effect, affirming that the main cause as a support goes beyond the process, meaning the main cause of its cause and effect is simultaneous without a process, or its process precedes all cause-and-effect processes.So❓What underlies all cause-and-effect is simultaneity, and that is the logical consequence.CAUSE AND EFFECT & LOGICAL CONSEQUENCESAs an example...."If there is a change, then there is a difference," so "change" is not the cause of "difference," and also "different" is not the cause of "change."Because both "change" and "difference" have no cause-and-effect relationship but a logical consequence relationship, not a probabilistic logical consequence, but a logical consequence affirming definite simultaneity.Between "change" and "difference," there is no precedence. We may perceive that if there is "change," there is "difference," but this does not imply a cause-and-effect process. This is our sequential perception, but fundamentally, both "change" and "difference" are inseparable unity.That is one example of a genuine logical consequence, affirming certainty as the cause of the diversity of cause-and-effect processes