DNA preservation &amp; DNA extraction protocol for field collection of coral samples suitable for host-, marker gene-, and metagenomics-based sequencing approaches
Creators: name: Voolstra, Christian R
name: Perna, Gabriela
name: Cárdenas, Anny
name: Colin, Luigi
name: Dörr, Melanie S
name: Fiesinger, Anna
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: coral
DNA isolation
DNA storage
field work
sample preservation

description: <strong>Summary</strong> The ability to collect samples suitable for DNA extraction in remote field settings without the necessity of freezing is a common need for molecular ecologists that has been addressed by the so-called DESS buffer, a solution containing DMSO, EDTA, and saturated NaCl (Dawson, Raskoff, &amp; Jacobs, 1998; Seutin, White, &amp; Boag, 1991). DESS is commonly used as a storage buffer for coral samples (Pinzón et al., 2013; Voolstra et al., 2021; Ziegler et al., 2017)and has also been shown to faithfully preserve DNA for bacterial community analyses (Gray, Pratte, &amp; Kellogg, 2013; Lee, Adams, &amp; Klassen, 2019). What is lesser known is that DESS buffer has been shown to preserve nematode morphology, comparable to formalin-based fixatives (Yoder et al., 2006) and, as such, preserves cell integrity. This makes it suitable for metagenomics applications, which typically rely on differentially lysis of eukaryotic (host) and prokaryotic (microbiome) cells to effectively deplete the eukaryotic host DNA. Protocols for effective depletion of coral host DNA and enrichment of bacterial DNA coverage for application in metagenome shotgun sequencing studies to our knowledge do not exist (Neave, Michell, Apprill, &amp; Voolstra, 2017; Robbins et al., 2019). To address this, we here developed a protocol for coral DNA preservation and DNA extraction suitable for host- (e.g., sWGS), marker gene- (e.g., ITS2, 16S), and metagenomics-based (e.g., microbiome) sequencing approaches. The protocol employs the DNA- and cell morphology-/integrity-preserving properties of DESS buffer, compatible with application in remote field settings and evading the need for cooling/freezing of samples. Sprayed-off tissue from coral fragments is then used for DNA extraction using two distinct extraction kits (the Qiagen DNeasy Blood &amp; Tissue Kit and the Qiagen QIAamp DNA Microbiome Kit) for use in host-, marker gene-, and metagenomics-based sequencing approaches. The protocol was successfully applied to coral samples from <em>Acropora</em> sp., <em>Pocillopora</em> sp., and <em>Porites</em> sp.. A detailed study on performance, efficacy, and benchmarking of the here-developed protocol in comparison to a range of other protocols is in preparation and is anticipated to be available shortly. We hope the here-developed protocol applies broadly and will be used widely.
description: Changes to Version 1.0: option to spray off tissue in initial DESS buffer volume was added for small sample volumes ≤ 2 mL. --- Changes to Version 1.1: added coral tissue homogenization step in DESS buffer before proceeding with either DNA isolation protocol --- This research was supported by funding from the University of Konstanz (AFF) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) project number 458901010.
description: {"references": ["Dawson, M. N., Raskoff, K. A., &amp; Jacobs, D. K. (1998). Field preservation of marine invertebrate tissue for DNA analyses.\u00a0Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology,\u00a07(2), 145\u2013152. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11541322", "Gray, M. A., Pratte, Z. A., &amp; Kellogg, C. A. (2013). Comparison of DNA preservation methods for environmental bacterial community samples.\u00a0FEMS Microbiology Ecology,\u00a083(2), 468\u2013477. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12008", "Lee, K. M., Adams, M., &amp; Klassen, J. L. (2019). Evaluation of DESS as a storage medium for microbial community analysis.\u00a0PeerJ,\u00a07, e6414. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6414", "Neave, M. J., Michell, C. T., Apprill, A., &amp; Voolstra, C. R. (2017).\u00a0Endozoicomonas\u00a0genomes reveal functional adaptation and plasticity in bacterial strains symbiotically associated with diverse marine hosts.\u00a0Scientific Reports,\u00a07, 40579. doi: 10.1038/srep40579", "Pinz\u00f3n, J. H., Sampayo, E., Cox, E., Chauka, L. J., Chen, C. A., Voolstra, C. R., &amp; LaJeunesse, T. C. (2013). Blind to morphology: genetics identifies several widespread ecologically common species and few endemics among Indo-Pacific cauliflower corals (Pocillopora , Scleractinia).\u00a0Journal of Biogeography,\u00a040(8), 1595\u20131608. doi: 10.1111/jbi.12110", "Robbins, S. J., Singleton, C. M., Chan, C. X., Messer, L. F., Geers, A. U., Ying, H., \u2026 Bourne, D. G. (2019). A genomic view of the reef-building coral\u00a0Porites lutea\u00a0and its microbial symbionts.\u00a0Nature Microbiology,\u00a04(12), 2090\u20132100. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0532-4", "Seutin, G., White, B. N., &amp; Boag, P. T. (1991). Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses.\u00a0Canadian Journal of Zoology,\u00a069(1), 82\u201390. doi: 10.1139/z91-013", "Voolstra, C. R., Quigley, K. M., Davies, S. W., Parkinson, J. E., Peixoto, R. S., Aranda, M., \u2026 Sweet, M. (2021). Consensus guidelines for advancing coral holobiont genome and specimen voucher deposition.\u00a0Frontiers in Marine Science,\u00a08, 1029. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.701784", "Yoder, M., De Ley, I. T., King, I. W., Mundo-Ocampo, M., Mann, J., Blaxter, M., \u2026 De Ley, P. (2006). DESS: a versatile solution for preserving morphology and extractable DNA of nematodes.\u00a0Nematology: International Journal of Fundamental and Applied Nematological Research,\u00a08(3), 367\u2013376. doi: 10.1163/156854106778493448", "Ziegler, M., Arif, C., Burt, J. A., Dobretsov, S., Roder, C., LaJeunesse, T. C., &amp; Voolstra, C. R. (2017). Biogeography and molecular diversity of coral symbionts in the genus Symbiodinium around the Arabian Peninsula.\u00a0Journal of Biogeography,\u00a044(3), 674\u2013686. doi: 10.1111/jbi.12913"]}