On the protein content of kidney stones: an explorative study
Creators: name: Steenbeke, Mieke
name: De Buyzere, Marc L.
name: Speeckaert, Marijn M.
name: Delanghe, Joris R.
Publisher: name: Taylor & Francis
Year: 2021
Subjects: subject: Biophysics
subject: Biochemistry
subject: Medicine
subject: Pharmacology
subject: 59999 Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified
subject: FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences
subject: 39999 Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified
subject: FOS: Chemical sciences
subject: 20199 Astronomical and Space Sciences not elsewhere classified
subject: FOS: Physical sciences
subject: 69999 Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
subject: FOS: Biological sciences
subject: Cancer
subject: Inorganic Chemistry
subject: Plant Biology

description: Kidney stone formation is complex; urinary protein inhibitors play a major role in natural defense against stone formation. Using attenuated total‐reflectance Fourier-transform infrared (ATR‐FTIR) spectroscopy of kidney stones, proteins are usually not quantified and often reported as ‘organic matrix’, for which there is little attention: treatment of urolithiasis is based on the nature of the major organic/inorganic stone compound. Literature no longer regards urinary proteins as innocent bystander, but highlights the role of proteins as urolithiasis modulators. We explored the potential significance of the protein content of kidney stones. 800 stones were analyzed using ATR‐FTIR spectroscopy; spectra were corrected for protein content. The ratio of the amide I peak (1655 cm<sup>−1</sup>) divided by the maximum peak was calculated. A subgroup of stones (n = 43) was weighed; protein concentration was assayed. Kidney stone composition was taken into account when calculating protein concentration. Electrophoresis was implemented to investigate the protein bands. Multiple regression analysis was carried out to study the influence of various demographic variables (age, gender, stone type) on protein concentration. Protein concentration showed a marked variation according to the stone composition. High relative protein content (&gt;0.4% stone mass) was found in mixed calcium apatite/calcium oxalate dihydrate stones, mixed calcium oxalate dihydrate/calcium oxalate monohydrate/calcium apatite stones, and mixed calcium oxalate monohydrate/brushite stones, whereas lower protein percentages were found in cystine, urate, and calcium oxalate monohydrate stones. Protein concentration was dependent of the patient’s age. ATR-FTIR is a practical way for assessing protein concentration in kidney stones. A: absorbance; as, asymmetric vibrations; ATR-FTIR, attenuated total‐reflectance Fourier-transform infrared; β, standardized regression coefficient; CAP, calcium apatite; COD, calcium oxalate dihydrate; COM, calcium oxalate monohydrate; CV, coefficient of variation; δ, bending vibrations; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; IQR, interquartile range; IR, infrared; LOD, limit of detection; LOQ, limit of quantification; MIR, mid-infrared; N or n, amount; r, correlation; r<sup>2</sup>, coefficient of determination; s, symmetric vibrations; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error; THP, Tamm-Horsfall protein; UA, uric acid; V, stretching vibrations; VIF: variance inflation factor; ZnSe, zinc selenide