Canthon (Goniocanthon) smaragdulus
Creators: name: Nunes, Luis Gabriel de O. A.
name: Nunes, Rafael V.
name: Vaz-De, Fernando Z.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2018
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Scarabaeidae
Canthon
Canthon smaragdulus

description: Canthon (Goniocanthon) smaragdulus (Fabricius, 1781)
Figs 1 A–C, G–H, 2, 5–6, 8
Redescription
Males
COLOUR. Dorsal and ventral surface green to blue, always with blue metallic sheen.
HEAD. Frontal surface smooth, lacking horns or tubercles. Clypeal teeth with rounded apex, with thin setae at the apex; teeth separated by a U-shaped emargination. Clypeo-genal junction slightly emarginated, rounded. Clypeo-genal suture present.
PRONOTUM. Disc simply convex, smooth, lacking microscultpure (120 × magnification). Anterior and posterior angles acute. Lateral borders effaced. Posterior border with lateral semicircular emarginations near to posterior angles.
HYPOMERON. Lacking transverse keel, surface black with chagrined microsculpture. Sparse setae present on anterior portion.
METASTERNUM. Anterior lobe distinctly convex (Fig. 1B).
ELYTRA. Striae weakly impressed, more distinct near elytral basis. Eighth stria carinate along its basal third. Interstriae flat.
LEGS. Protibiae three-toothed, dorsal surface with two tufts of setae present on each tibial tooth. Protibial spur truncate, wider than long and apically emarginated, forming two spines. External border of protibia serrated. Profemur ventral surface black, smooth, glabrous, with a distal tooth on its anterior border. Ventral surface of meso- and metatibiae smooth (Fig. 1A). Meso- and metatrochanter with a hair tuft near femur articulation.
ABDOMEN. Ventrites glabrous, lacking punctures and not narrowed medially.
PYGIDIUM. Convex (Fig. 1C). Basal line delimiting pygidium from pro-pygidium.
PARAMERA. On lateral view (Fig. 1G). Flattened; apex truncated; upper angle rounded; lower angle acute, forming a spine or tooth. On dorsal view (Fig. 1H): membranous portion wider at central portion and narrower near apex and basis. Apex rounded.
INTERNAL SAC (Figs 5, 9). FLP involving A, forming a central duct with spiniform apex. SA lateral to FLP + A complex. MP distal to A, semicircular, widely emarginated; FLP + A complex involved by MP. SRP with lateral prolongation.
Morphological variation
BL: 9–14 mm, PW: 6–9 mm. Colouration of dorsal surface metallic sheen may vary from green to blue metallic colouration (Fig. 2 A–B) (in both natural or artificial light). Female protibial spur as wide as long with a U-shaped emargination. Pygidium and metasternum flatter in females than in males.
Canthon (Goniocanthon) smaragdulus smaragdulus (Fabricius, 1781) Figs 1 A–C, G–H, 2A, 6, 8
Scarabaeus smaragdulus Fabricius, 1781: 34.
Canthon speculifer Castelnau, 1840: 68.
Scarabaeus smaragdulus – Fabricius 1787: 18 (catalogue). — Jablonsky & Herbst 1789: 328 (catalogue). — Olivier 1789: 158 (catalogue). — Fabricius 1792: 70 (catalogue).
Ateuchus smaragdulus – Fabricius 1801: 58.
Coprobius smaragdulus – Brullé 1838: 294.
Canthon smaragdulus – Blanchard 1846: 161. — Harold 1868: 14, 75 (key). — Gemminger & Harold 1869: 994 (catalogue). — Harold 1875: 59 (catalogue). — Gillet 1911: 33 (catalogue). — Schmidt 1922: 69 (key). — Boucomont 1928: 2 (catalogue). — Staig 1931: 44 (redescription; lectotype designation). — Balthasar 1939: 203 (key). — Pessôa & Lâne 1941: 420 (species list). — Lange 1947: 307 (catalogue).
Canthon speculifer – Harold 1868: 13, 70 (key). — Gemminger & Harold 1869: 994 (catalogue). — Harold 1875: 58 (catalogue). — Heyne & Taschenberg 1908: 61 (catalogue). — Boucomont 1928: 2 (catalogue). — Balthasar 1939: 203 (key). — Pessôa & Lâne 1941: 420 (species list). — Blackwelder 1944: 201 (catalogue). — Lange 1947: 307 (catalogue). — Gacharná 1951: 221 (catalogue). — Guérin 1953: 257 (catalogue). — Pereira & Martínez 1956: 111 (synonym of Goniocanthon smaragdulus).
Canthon smaragdulum – Blackwelder 1944: 201 (catalogue). — Louzada 1998: 125 (behaviour).
Goniocanthon smaragdulus – Pereira & Martínez 1956: 109. — Vulcano & Pereira 1964: 593 (catalogue).
Canthon (Goniocanthon) smaragdulus – Halffter & Martínez 1977: 75. — Vaz-de-Mello et al. 2011: 52–53, figs 35, 44 (key).
Canthon (Goniocanthon) smaragdulum – Vaz-de-Mello 2000: 191 (species list).
Diagnosis
Canthon (G.) smaragdulus smaragdulus is separated within the subgenus by the following combination of characters: ventral surface of meso- and metafemora smooth (Fig. 1A); dorsal surface of pronotum and elytral disc with similar blue metallic sheen colouration (Fig. 2A); metasternal anterior lobe strongly convex (Fig. 1B); profemur with a tooth on its anterior border. Paramera in lateral view (Fig. 1G): flattened; apex truncate; upper angle rounded; lower angle acute, forming a spine or tooth. Internal sac (Fig. 6): FLP involving A forming a central duct with spiniform apex. SA lateral to FLP + A complex present. MP distal to A, not divided, semicircular, widely emarginated; FLP + A complex involved by MP.
Material examined
Lectotype (of Scarabaeus smaragdulus Fabricius, 1781; designated by Staig 1931: 44)
BRAZIL:♁, type(round, white with red margin label) /141815 (white) /compared with modern exemplars in Brit. Mus. R.A.S. March 1925 (white handwritten in red) / Hab. in Brasilia (white with black margins) / Sc. smaragdulus, Fabr. faog. 34 Nº127 (white with black margins) / Scarabaeus smaragdulus Fabr., Canthon smaragdulus Fabr. Type (white with red margins) / LECTOTYPE, Scarabaeus smaragdulus Fabricius, des. FZ Vaz-de-Mello 2014 (red with black margins) (HMUG 141815).
Neotype (for Canthon speculifer Castelnau, 1840; here designated)
BRAZIL: ♁, Muséum Paris, Rio Castelnau (white label) / 10, 44 (round white) / Canthon smaragdulus Fabr. (white) / NEOTYPE, Canthon speculifer Castelnau, des. FZ Vaz-de-Mello 2014 (red with black margins) (MNHN).
Non-type material (125 specimens)
BRAZIL – Mato Grosso do Sul: 1 ♁, Rio Paraná, 26 Jan. 1918 (CEMT); 3 ♁♁, 2 ♀♀, Bodoquena, Fazenda Califórnia, 20º41′ S, 56º51′ W, Mar. 2011, L.O. Bavuti leg. (CEMT); 3 ♁♁, 2 ♀♀, Bonito, Fazenda Brasil Bonito, 21º06′ S, 56º38′ W, human faeces, Nov. 2009, F.O. Roque leg. (CEMT); 3 ♀♀, Bonito, Hotel Cabanas, 21º10′15″ S, 56º26′22″ W, human faeces, Dec. 2010, L.O. Bavuti leg. (CEMT); 1 ♁, Bonito, Fazenda Pitangueiras, 20º52′14″ S, 56º35′19″ W, human faeces, Nov. 2009, F.O. Roque leg. (CEMT); 9 ♁♁, 18 ♀♀, Bonito, Fazenda Pitangueiras, Córrego Roda D’agua, 20º52′14″ S, 56º35′19″ W, human faeces, Nov. 2009, Entomologia-UFGD leg. (CEMT); 1 ♁, Bonito, Fazenda Remanso 20º47′ S, 56º43′ W, Nov. 2009, F.O. Roque leg. (CEMT); 2 ♁♁, 1 ♀, Ivinhema, 22º31′ S, 53º53′ W, human faeces Mar. 2011, L.O. Bavuti leg. (CEMT); 1 ♁, 1 ♀, Jardim, Rio da Prata, 21º25′ S, 56º27′ W, Mar. 2011, L.O. Bavuti leg. (CEMT). – São Paulo: 1 ♁, 1 ♀, P.E. Serra do Mar, Núcleo Caraguatatuba, 23º35′27″ S, 45º25′19″ W, human faeces, 17, 13 Jan. 2012, E. Bovy leg. (CEMT); 4 ♁♁, 1 ♀, P.E. Serra do Mar, Núcleo Picinguaba, 23º20′13″ S, 44º50′06″ W, human faeces, 14 Jan. 2012, E. Bovy (CEMT); 5 ♀♀, same data as for preceding, but 23º20′11″ S, 44º50′03″ W (CEMT); 1 ♁, 1 ♀, same data as for preceding, but 23º20′05″ S, 44º49′59″ W (CEMT); 1 ♁, same data as for preceding, but 23º20′07″ S, 44º50′01″ W (CEMT); 1 ♁, same data as for preceding, but 23º20′00″ S, 44º49′58″ W (CEMT); 1 ♁, same data as for preceding, but 23º20′02″ S, 44º49′58″ W (CEMT); 20 ♁♁, 4 ♀♀, same data as for preceding, but 23º20′13″ S, 44º50′08″ W (CEMT); 1 ♁, Ubatuba, 23º26′00″ S, 45º5′22″ W, 12 Jan. 2000, E. Pereira Coleção, G.P. Almeida leg. (CEMT); 1 ♁, Campinas, Ribeirão Cachoeira, Mata, Jan. 1996, D.A. Gaspar leg. (CEMT); 2 ♁♁, Campinas, Ribeirão Cachoeira, Mata, Fezes Alouatta, 5 Feb. 1998, Fabri and Setz leg. (CEMT); 1 ♁, 2 ♀♀, Sete Barras, Parque Estadual Carlos Botelho, human faeces, 24º11′45″ S, 47º55′25″ W, 30 Jan. 2012, E. Bovy leg. (CEMT). – Paraná: 2 ♁♁, Palotina, UFPR, “Mata anexa ao campus”, Pitfall 2, 28 Dec. 2011, R.J. Simioni, S.B. Silva and E. Caron leg. (CEMT); 4 ♁♁, 2 ♀♀, Morretes, Santuário Nhundiaquara, 25º25′32″ S, 48º53′21″ W, 100 m a.s.l., human faeces, 15 Jan. 2016, E.H. Raine leg. (CEMT); 1 ♁, 3 ♀♀, same data as for preceding, but 2 Mar. 2016, E.H. Raine leg. (CEMT); 5 ♁♁, 1 ♀, same data as for preceding, but 27 Jan. 2016, E.H. Raine leg. (CEMT); 1 ♁, same data as for preceding, but 25º27′55″ S, 48º52′47″ W, 110 m a.s.l., human faeces, 3 Mar. 2016, E.H. Raine leg. (CEMT); 1 ♁, 1 ♀, Morretes, Fazenda Bom Jardim, 25º27′5″ S, 48º52′47″ W, 110 m a.s.l., human faeces, 16 Jan. 2016, E.H. Raine leg. (CEMT); 1 ♁, same data as for preceding, but pig faeces, 16 Jan. 2016, E.H. Raine leg. (CEMT); 2 ♀♀, Morretes, E.E. Embrapa, 25º27′11″ S, 48º52′57″ W, 140 m a.s.l., human faeces, 17 Dec. 2015, E.H. Raine leg. (CEMT). – Rio: 1 ♁, 1844, Castelnau leg. (MNHN). – Santa Catarina: 2 ♁♁, 1 ♀, Içara, 28º40′ S, 49º16′ W, pitfall isca, 2 Jan. 2014, M.M. Niero leg. (CEMT).
ARGENTINA – Misiones: 2 ♀♀, Puerto Iguazu, Jan. 1991 (CEMT); 1 ♁, Porto Libertad, APSA, P.P. Península, “bosque nativo adyacente a Pinar joven – 2007”, Feb. 2010, Coprotrampa, M.N. Peyras leg. (CEMT).
PARAGUAY – Guairá: 1 ♀, General Eugenio Alejandrino Garay, 25–31 May 1992, U. Drechsel leg. (CEMT).
Remarks and requirements for neotype designation according to Article 75 of The Code
Canthon speculifer was described by Castelnau (1840: 68). From this description it is possible to confirm that Castelnau referred to a blue-to-green Goniocanthon, mainly because he cited the gibbose metasternum, unique among Canthon. Evenhuis (2012) stated that part of Castelnau’s syntype collection was incorporated into the Smithsonian Institute in Washington, and destroyed in a fire on January 24 th, 1865. Canthon speculifer was probably among these type specimens because successive searches in European and American museums did not yield the type series of C. speculifer. However, Castelnau had visited Brazil on a different occasion in the company of Eugêne d’Osery. They arrived in Rio Janeiro on June 17 th, 1843 to acquire information about Brazilian geography and history, as well as specimens for the French Academy of Sciences (Papavero 1971). Among these is a historical specimen deposited at MNHN in 1844 and identified by Castelnau as C. speculifer. This specimen, which we now propose as neotype, is not part of the syntypic series because it was collected some time after the description of C. speculifer; however, it was Castelnau himself who identified and labelled it only shortly after his original description, thus he probably maintained a clear vision of C. speculifer. The comparison of the designated neotype with the lectotype of C. smaragdulus reveals that C. speculifer and C. smaragdulus are synonyms. This neotype designation fixes the name C. speculifer according to Castelnau’s original concept and allows us to establish the synonymy with C. smaragdulus.
Distribution
Brazilian Atlantic Forest and Paraná river forest (states of Mato Grosso do Sul, Paraná, Santa Catarina, São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro). Also in the Argentinian province of Misiones and the Paraguayan department of Guairá (Fig. 8).
Taxonomic remarks
The lectotype of Scarabaeus smaragdulus Fabricius, 1781 was designated by Staig (1931), who illustrated a specimen of the original series calling it “the type” (ICZN 1999: article 74.6).
description: Published as part of Nunes, Luis Gabriel de O. A., Nunes, Rafael V. & Vaz-De, Fernando Z., 2018, Taxonomic revision of the South American subgenus Canthon (Goniocanthon) Pereira & Martínez, 1956 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Deltochilini), pp. 1-31 in European Journal of Taxonomy 437 on pages 6-10, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2018.437, http://zenodo.org/record/3787887