Artificial intelligence‑informed mobile mental health apps for young people: a mixed‑methods approach on users’ and stakeholders’ perspectives
Creators: name: Götzl, Christian
name: Hiller, Selina
name: Rauschenberg, Christian
name: Schick, Anita
name: Fechtelpeter, Janik
name: Fischer Abaigar, Unai
name: Koppe, Georgia
name: Durstewitz, Daniel
name: Reininghaus, Ulrich
name: Krumm, Silvia
Publisher: name: Universität Ulm
Year: 2022
Subjects: subject: Youth mental health
subject: Mental health promotion and prevention
subject: Mobile health (mhealth)
subject: Ecological momentary assessment
subject: Ecological momentary interventions
subject: Artificial intelligence
subject: DDC 150 / Psychology
subject: Mental health
subject: Adolescent
subject: Medical informatics applications
subject: Mobile applications
subject: Telemedicine
subject: Jugend
subject: Psychische Gesundheit
subject: Telemedizin
subject: App

description: Background Novel approaches in mobile mental health (mHealth) apps that make use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Ecological Momentary Assessments, and Ecological Momentary Interventions have the potential to support young people in the achievement of mental health and wellbeing goals. However, little is known on the perspectives of young people and mental health experts on this rapidly advancing technology. This study aims to investigate the subjective needs, attitudes, and preferences of key stakeholders towards an AI–informed mHealth app, including young people and experts on mHealth promotion and prevention in youth. Methods We used a convergent parallel mixed–method study design. Two semi–structured online focus groups (n = 8) and expert interviews (n = 5) to explore users and stakeholders perspectives were conducted. Furthermore a representative online survey was completed by young people (n = 666) to investigate attitudes, current use and preferences towards apps for mental health promotion and prevention. Results Survey results show that more than two-thirds of young people have experience with mHealth apps, and 60% make regular use of 1–2 apps. A minority (17%) reported to feel negative about the application of AI in general, and 19% were negative about the embedding of AI in mHealth apps. This is in line with qualitative findings, where young people displayed rather positive attitudes towards AI and its integration into mHealth apps. Participants reported pragmatic attitudes towards data sharing and safety practices, implying openness to share data if it adds value for users and if the data request is not too intimate, however demanded transparency of data usage and control over personalization. Experts perceived AI-informed mHealth apps as a complementary solution to on–site delivered interventions in future health promotion among young people. Experts emphasized opportunities in regard with low-threshold access through the use of smartphones, and the chance to reach young people in risk situations. Conclusions The findings of this exploratory study highlight the importance of further participatory development of training components prior to implementation of a digital mHealth training in routine practice of mental health promotion and prevention. Our results may help to guide developments based on stakeholders’ first recommendations for an AI-informed mHealth app.