Chemistry's enantiomers explain B meson decay not with a 5th force of the universe but with chirality or what TV's comedy "The Big Bang Theory" termed Super-Asymmetry
Creators: name: Rodney, Bartlett
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Chemistry, enantiomers, B meson decay, 5th force of the universe, chirality, TV's "The Big Bang Theory", Super-Asymmetry

description: <strong><em>Chemistry’s enantiomers explain B meson decay not with a 5<sup>th</sup> force of the universe but with chirality or what TV’s comedy “The Big Bang Theory” termed Super-Asymmetry</em></strong> By Rodney Bartlett First, a little background info from reference (1) and Wikipedia – “(Chirality is an) asymmetry resulting in an object not being superimposable upon its mirror image. Two isomers (substances with the same molecular formula but with the atoms arranged differently) which are mirror images of one another are called <em>enantiomers</em>. Towards symmetrical environments, enantiomers behave identically, but towards other chiral molecules they are different. Thus they will have identical melting points, but may have different tastes and smells.” Wikipedia says, “Supersymmetry is a spacetime symmetry between two basic classes of particles: bosons, which have an integer-valued spin and follow Bose–Einstein statistics, and fermions, which have a half-integer-valued spin and follow Fermi–Dirac statistics.” (The term Super-Asymmetry for which Sheldon and Amy won the Nobel Prize on TV is adapted from the Supersymmetry [no A] of physics.) Penguin well describes the chemical asymmetry which exists in the levo- (L) and dextro- (D) forms of compounds e.g. as L-dopa, the amino acid which is a precursor of melanin, dopamine, adrenaline, and noradrenaline – and is used to treat Parkinson’s Disease. Just as enantiomers behave differently towards other chiral molecules, the largely enantiomorphic – because their properties, except for mass, are similar - muons (mu-mesons) and electrons behave differently* during the decay of B mesons. The implication is that muons and electrons are chiral in nature, and that they behave differently in relation to an “other” chiral particle (the B meson). Since every type of meson is composed of a quark plus an antiquark, (2) the two latter particles should also be chiral. * “According to the law of lepton universality, as predicted by the Standard Model, the probability of B mesons decaying into electrons and muons should be equal. But it was observed that nature favors the decay channel of electrons more than the muons. B mesons seem to decay to muons 15 percent less often than they do to electrons.” (3) This anomalous B meson decay has been proposed to indicate that there may be an unknown 5<sup>th</sup> force in the universe (in addition to the 4 known ones – gravitation, electromagnetism, weak nuclear force, strong nuclear force). Instead of a 5<sup>th</sup> force, the decay imbalance could indicate that all subatomic particles are not points or nanospheres or String theory’s strings but are chiral. Since chirality is a type of asymmetry, TV’s “Big Bang Theory’s” term “Super-Asymmetric” is accurate). This chirality is consistent with the turns and rotating motion inherent in topology’s Mobius strips and figure-8 Klein bottles - as well as in Wick rotation (which uses imaginary numbers). For more on these topics, please see (4)<strong>. </strong>The journal-published proposal in (4) for <strong>uniting General Relativity with Quantum Mechanics </strong>has its Abstract pasted into the "Additional Notes" section on this webpage. <strong>REFERENCES</strong> Penguin Encyclopedia 2006 - edited by David Crystal - 3<sup>rd</sup> edition, 2006 - ‘chirality’, p. 279 Workings of the Universe 1991 – Time-Life Books - p.27 New Intriguing Results From A Quantum Experiment Show There Might Be A Hidden Force In Nature. (secretsofuniverse.in). 2022. Rishabh Nakra Bartlett, Rodney. (2022). Using the discovery of fundamental variables by artificial intelligence to unite general relativity and quantum mechanics. https://doi.org/10.15406/aaoaj.2022.06.00149
description: Reference (4) expands on this article and is a proposed method of UNITING GENERAL RELATIVITY WITH QUANTUM MECHANICS. Here is the abstract in the science journal that published it - Abstract In a newsletter discussing "Automated discovery of fundamental variables hidden in experimental data" (Chen, B., Huang, K., Raghupathi, S. et al. Automated discovery of fundamental variables hidden in experimental data. Nat Comput Sci 2, 433–442 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-022-00281-6), Cosmos Magazine attributed the following statement to co-author Qiang Du, "What other laws are we missing simply because we don't have the variables?" According to Cosmos, another co-author (Hod Lipson) argues that scientists may be misinterpreting or failing to understand many phenomena simply because they don't have a good set of variables. All of this reminds me of the Hidden Variables associated with Albert Einstein's doubts about quantum mechanics. I've been thinking about hidden variables for perhaps twenty or more years and it seems that their combination with the Mobius strip, figure-8 Klein bottle, base 2 mathematics, vector-tensor-scalar geometry,* and Wick rotation might unite quantum mechanics and relativity. The union would result in explanation of particles existing in two or more places at once being due to our frame of reference. It would also explain wave-particle duality and, on a universal scale, why there was no Big Bang. * The section on vector-tensor-scalar geometry is very important since it provides insights into 1) cancer, and 2) the origin of the moon. The yet-to-be-discovered underlying physics of the wave function proposed in this comment predicts exactness in outcomes, not probability or randomness. Quantum mechanics says particles can, according to our frame of reference, be in two or more places at once. This frame of reference is necessarily restricted to our present understanding of quantum mechanics which Albert Einstein and his colleagues claimed to be incomplete. (1) Hidden Variables * are presently hypothetical factors based on the belief that the theory of quantum mechanics is incomplete. Their identification would lead to exact predictions, not just probabilities, for the outcomes of measurements. Albert Einstein is the most famous proponent of hidden variables. Their existence would vindicate his belief that quantum mechanics is lacking something. It's proposed here that electronics' binary digits (1's and 0's) are those hidden variables. * Despite Bell's theorem and the more recent Pusey–Barrett–Rudolph theorem, hidden variables can be a valid theory since the following boxed explanation of unification of all time periods allows the existence of both "retarded" waves going forwards in time and the disfavoured "advanced" waves travelling back in time – and this permits quantum entanglement of every form of mass if, as shown, gravitational waves interacting with electromagnetic waves is responsible for production of mass. The misperception that the universe is expanding is accounted for by re(tarded) / ad(vanced) shift.