Hypsiboas paranaiba Carvalho & Giaretta, new species
Creators: name: Carvalho, Thiago Ribeiro De
name: Giaretta, Ariovaldo Antonio
name: Facure, Kátia Gomes
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2010
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Amphibia
Anura
Hylidae
Hypsiboas
Hypsiboas paranaiba

description: Hypsiboas paranaiba Carvalho & Giaretta, new species
(Figures 1–3)
Holotype: ZUEC 16244 (former AAG-UFU 4647), an adult male from the farm of Mr. Adir Lemos (Fazenda Vão) (18°39’35”S; 48°08’14”W, approximately 600 m altitude), on the margins of the MG 413 road, municipality of Araguari, State of Minas Gerais, Brazil, collected by A.A. Giaretta and T.R. de Carvalho on September 27th, 2007.
Paratopotypes: Nine adult males from Araguari: AAG-UFU 2587 on November 18th, 2003; AAG-UFU 3167 on November 20th, 2005; AAG-UFU 4582 on June 26th, 2006; AAG-UFU 4619 on October 4th, 2007; ZUEC 16243 (former AAG-UFU 4646), AAG-UFU 4648, ZUEC 16245 (former AAG-UFU 4649) on September, 2007; AAG-UFU 4687, AAG-UFU 4688 on October 31st, 2008. Three adult females: AAG-UFU 3941, AAG-UFU 3942 on September 7th, 2006; AAG-UFU 4074 on September 19th, 2006. Paratypes: Two adult males from Ituiutaba (18º57’60”S; 49º29’61”W, approximately 600 m altitude): AAG-UFU 4793, AAG-UFU 4794 on October 4th, 2009. All collected by A.A. Giaretta and/or T.R. de Carvalho.
Differential Diagnosis: Hypsiboas paranaiba sp. n. is a long-headed, pointed snout species of the H. albopunctatus group, as H. albopunctatus, H. raniceps Cope, H. lanciformis Cope, H. leucocheilus Carasmachi & Niemeyer, and H. multifasciatus (sensu Lutz 1973). The head shape allied to SVL easily distinguishes this group from the other species in the genus. The new form is diagnosed by a combination of traits: (1) small size for the group (SVL 46.2–52.3 mm, mean 49.4, SD=2.1; N=15); (2) absence of white stripe on upper or upper and lower lips; (3) presence of white supra-anal dermal ridge; (4) absence of distinct light spots or black bars on posterior surface of thighs; (5) head width/length ratio.
Hypsiboas paranaiba sp. n. (Figures 1–3) is smaller than the large-sized species of the group, H. lanciformis (60.8–70.6 mm, mean 63.7; N=8) and H. leucocheilus (56.7–81.2 mm; N=13) (Caramaschi & Niemeyer 2003). Besides, the new species does not present a white stripe on upper or upper and lower lips, as in H. lanciformis and H. leucocheilus respectively. It differs from H. raniceps (45.5–81.6 mm, mean 63.3; N=12) by the absence of well-defined dark bars on inner and outer surfaces of thighs, and by the presence of white supra-anal dermal ridge. It differs from H. albopunctatus (40.3–56.7 mm, mean 48.0; N=19) by the absence of distinct light (yellow in life, white in preservative) spots on the hidden parts of thighs and inguinal region.
Although SVL overlaps, maximum SVL of Hypsiboas paranaiba sp. n. (mean male SVL 49.0, range 46.3–52.3 mm; SD=2.1, N=12; mean female SVL 48.9, range 46.2–51.2 mm; SD=2.5, N=3) is smaller than: (i) topotypic H. multifasciatus (mean male SVL 50.2 mm, range 46.3–58.6 mm; SD=3.7, N=10; mean female SVL 55.9 mm, range 49.1–65.4 mm; SD=4.8, N=9) (De Sá unpl. data), (ii) northern Brazilian (Venezuelan border) H. multifasciatus populations (male SVL 50.4–57.3 mm, mean 52.9; N= 9 males) (Duellman 1997) and (iii) our sample of H. multifasciatus from southern Pará (ZUEC specimens) males range from 46.3–55.3 mm SVL (mean 50.7, SD=4.0, N=4; mean female SVL 50.8, SD=2.9, N=2).
Additionally, we performed Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on raw measurements of topotypes of H. multifasciatus (R. de Sá unpublished thesis) and our new species. The first three principal components accounted for 77.8% of the overall variation and PCA factor loadings are given in Appendix 2. A plot of factor scores on the first two axes (Figure 11) showed that the new species (MG) and the topotypes of H. multifasciatus (PA) overlapped completely along the first PC axis, which represented overall size (Table 1). In contrast, along the second PC axis, the new species was almost completely separated from H. multifasciatus topotypes, reflecting its relatively narrower eye-nostril distance (END), wider head (HW), smaller eye diameter (ED), and longer foot (FL) in relation to the topotypic (Belém, State of Pará) population.
The new species have significantly wider head (homogeneous slopes ANCOVA, F1;19=18.293; p<0.001) than topotypic H. multifasciatus (Figure 12).
Head width/head length ratio was significantly (t=5.84; p<0.001; df=20) larger in H. paranaiba sp. n. than in H. multifasciatus. In the former, head slightly longer than wide (N=9), sometimes wider than long (N=2) and in one case as long as wide (HW/HL = 0.91–1.05, mean 0.96, SD=0.04, N= 12 males), in the latter, head always longer (on average 14%) than wide (HW/HL=0.79–0.92, mean 0.86, SD=0.04, N= 10 males; De Sá unpublished thesis).
Moreover, none of the specimens of Hypsiboas paranaiba sp. n. presents a black mid-dorsal stripe, which may be present in H. multifasciatus.
Hypsiboas paranaiba sp. n. presents three types of notes (notes A, B and C; see call description section and Figs. 4–5; Table 2). In our sample of calls, Amazonian H. multifasciatus presents calls resembling these three, and an exclusive fourth type (note D; presented below) (Figure 6), which presents harmonic structure. Note D is temporally similar to note C of H. paranaiba sp. n. but similar in dominant frequency to note A. Quantitatively note A of the new species differs from that of H. multifasciatus by presenting a significantly (t=3.98, p=0.0022, df=11) longer (~50%) call, more pulses per call (t=2.68; p=0.0215; df=11), and significantly (t=2.54; p=0.027; df=11) lower dominant frequency (Figures 4–5; Table 2). The new species differs from H. raniceps (mean call duration = 162.7 ms (114–244), SD=30.8; mean dominant frequency = 0.76 kHz (0.71–0.90), SD=0.03, N=31 calls) and H. lanciformis (mean call duration = 390.4 ms (252–566), SD=75.4; mean dominant frequency = 1.65 kHz (1.49–1.87), SD=0.1; N=23 calls) by presenting sharper (higher in pitch) and longer calls (Marquez et al. 1993; Figure 9); from H. albopunctatus (dominant frequency from 1.8 to 2.0 kHz in Riviera, Uruguay, and in the State of São Paulo, Brazil; from 2.0 to 2.3 kHz in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; and from 1.9 to 2.1 kHz in Misiones, Argentina), by sharper (higher in pitch) call and absence of pulses in well-delimited groups (Kwet et al. 2002; Figure 10).
Features (mm) H. multifasciatus H. paranaiba sp. n.
Type locality (PA) Type locality (MG)
¹ Specimens from the unpublished thesis of R. de Sá ² Including the holotype
* Measurements not provided.
Holotype description: ZUEC 16244 (Figures 1 b, 2 and 3b). Body slender to robust; head slightly longer than wide; snout pointed, sub-elliptical in dorsal view, slightly protruding in lateral view; nostrils slightly protuberant, directed laterally; tympanum diameter 86% of eye diameter; canthus rostralis distinct; loreal region slightly concave; eye-nostril distance 90% of eye diameter; cranial crests absent; tympanum circular; supratympanic fold present from the proximal border of the eye to around half of the body in the flanks; vocal sac single, subgular. Forearm more robust than arm, but not hypertrophied; a discrete dermal ridge on outer forearm from the elbow articulation to outer edge of finger IV; inner metacarpal tubercle evident, elongated, the outer indistinguishable; prepollex defined, prepollical spine as a curved pointed fang, hidden under the skin; fingers slender; subarticular tubercles single, rounded; few small supernumerary tubercles present; finger disks large, circular; first finger disk remarkably smaller than those of the other fingers; finger 1<2<4<3; diameter of third finger disk 34% of eye diameter, and about 40% of tympanum diameter; fingers mostly fringed along sides, mostly free from one another; webbing formula, I none II2–3 1/2 III3–2 IV. Legs long, slender; thigh slightly shorter than shank; a discrete dermal ridge on outer tarsus, from tibiotarsal articulation to outer edge of toe V; no calcar; inner metatarsal tubercle ovoid; outer undefined; subarticular tubercles single, rounded; few discrete supernumerary tubercles on plant; toe disks less defined than those of fingers; toes extensively webbed; toe 1<2<3~5<4; webbing formula, I1–2 + II1–2 1/2 III1–2 1/2 IV2–1 V. Skin on dorsal surfaces smooth; gula and chest smooth, belly and under surfaces of thighs areolate; a transversal supra-anal dermal ridge.
Measurements (mm) and proportions (%) in relation to size: SVL 49.6, SL 30.4 (61.3), TL 29.8 (60.1), FL 23.8 (48.0), HAL 13.1 (26.4), HL 16.8 (33.9), HW 16.5 (33.3), END 4.5 (9.1), FDD 1.7 (3.4), TDD 1.6 (3.2), ED 5.0 (10.1), TD 4.3 (8.7).
Color. In preservative (ethanol 70%), dorsum reddish brown with darker brown transversal stripes, irregular black spots and few small light dots scattered on dorsal surface of body and limbs. A darker stripe on loreal region; a straight black line bordering the supratympanic fold. Lower lip bordered by a thin white stripe. Flanks essentially brownish, immaculate. Dermal ridge along outer forearms, evidenced in white. Anterior surface of thighs uniformly brownish, without dots or bars; posterior surface of thighs brownish, with very small (<1 mm) light dots; dermal ridge along outer tarsi, evidenced in white; dark brown stripe along the posterior surface of shanks; gular region cream, with a brown stripe surrounding the border of jaw; chest whitish cream, smooth; belly yellowish cream; under surface of limbs cream; outer portion of the ventral surface of tarsi, feet and hands, including the webbing, grayish.
Intra-oral features (paratypes AAG-UFU 2587 and ZUEC 16245): vocal slits present, at the inner border of jaws; tongue large, rounded, covering the entire floor of mouth, free and slightly notched behind; vomerine teeth in two arch-shaped rows nearly in medial contact, between widely separated broad choanae.
Variation: Variation in size is given in Table 1. There were specimens with color in preservative from a light gray (AAG-UFU 4687 and AAG-UFU 4688), nearly white in some parts, to a very dark brown (AAG- UFU 4619), almost the same color as the transversal stripes. There were specimens with well-delimited small white dots on inguinal region in addition to the dorsal surface. The quantity and distribution of black spots and white dots were quite variable within the type-series. The females (AAG-UFU 3941, AAG-UFU 3942 and AAG-UFU 4074) presented a darker color (tending to grayish rather than creamish) along gular region, chest, posterior belly, and ventral surface of thighs, shanks, hands and feet.
from the State of Maranhão (Toledo 2008); advertisement call of H. paranaiba sp. n. from the type locality (present
work, MG) and from the State of Goiás (Guimarães et al. 2001). Mean, SD and ranges respectively. The letter “N”
represents the number of recorded specimens. The question mark represents data either not provided or unavailable for
analysis.
H. paranaiba sp. n. H. multifasciatus
Color in life: Iris bronze to light gray, mostly with a blue ring or half a ring around it. White thin stripe on lower lip; dark brown from the tip of snout until the distal border of the eye on loreal region; dark brown line just below the supra-tympanic fold; dorsum reddish to light yellow, with irregular dark spots, often present on dorsal surfaces, flanks immaculate. Throat cream and belly yellowish cream, with small dark dots surrounding the border of jaw. Small light dots on outer surfaces of thighs, and on inguinal region on a dark brown background. Broad brownish transversal stripes on dorsum, and on dorsal surface of thighs, shanks and arms, outlined by a narrow white line. White transversal supra-anal dermal ridge, and white dermal ridges from the elbow and tibiotarsal articulations to the outer tip of the fourth finger and fifth toe. Brownish stripe along outer surface of tarsi.
Color in preservative: dorsum brownish, reddish to light grayish or cream, brownish dorsal transversal stripes, ventral surface of gula and chest cream, belly yellowish cream. Blue ring around iris absent. Small dark dots surrounding the border of jaw, sometimes extending to the gula and chest regions, mainly observed in females.
Habitat and Behaviour: Males (N=15) call at forest border along streams in relatively shaded environments, such as palm grove marshes, forests, or nearby (<50 m) open areas (N=1). Males call on the ground or perched on the vegetation up to 2 m high. In Ituiutaba, three species of the H. albopunctatus group were found calling at close range from each other, where H. raniceps and H. albopunctatus call in open areas, while H. paranaiba sp. n. calls from the forest border to inside. Other syntopic forest species include Hypsiboas lundii Burmeister, Barycholos ternetzi Miranda-Ribeiro, Leptodactylus aff. leptodactyloides Andersson, and Dendropsophus cruzi Pombal & Bastos. In Araguari, H. paranaiba sp. n. was heard all year round, except July. Some of the collected specimens had the dorsum full of superficial scars (Figure 3 b), probably caused by male-male interactions.
H. multifasciatus calls: Five males recorded (KU 128470–74); N=5 recordings (7755–7759): note A = 25, note D = 17). Calls with four types of notes. The advertisement call (here called note A, Figure 5) is released alone or in groups of 1–3 calls/call group. Advertisement call repetition rate ranges from 1–3 calls/ min. (mean 1.8 calls/min, SD=0.4; N=5). It presents a pulsed structure and shows no significant modulation. Note duration ranges from 243–597 ms (mean 383 ms, SD=57.2; N=5), with a mean time interval of 441 ms (SD=46.5; N=5). The mean pulse repetition rate is 200.8 pulses/sec. (SD=30.1; N=5), and mean number of pulses per call is 92.8 (SD=16.1; N=5); dominant frequency ranges from 2.60–3.40 kHz (mean 2.92 kHz; SD=0.2; N=5). Call sections with note types B and C were improper for detailed analysis and graphing. Note D (Figure 6) presents between 5–6 visible harmonics (the fundamental being the weakest, around 500 Hz, sometimes not present in the sonograms, and the other five well-defined). Note D is emitted 1–3 times in a single sequence, usually just before the advertisement call (note A). Note D duration ranges from 79–180 ms (mean 119.4 ms, SD=25.6; N=5), dominant frequency ranges from 2.60–3.00 kHz (mean 2.81 kHz, SD=0.2; N=5), and corresponds to the fifth harmonic.
H. paranaiba sp. n. calls: eight males recorded (AAG-UFU 4793–94, ZUEC 16243–44, one male from the paratopotypes (AAG-UFU 4648 or ZUEC 16245), and three non-collected males); N=10 recordings: note A = 25, note B = 22, note C = 9). Calls with three types of notes. The advertisement call (note A, Figure 4) is emitted alone or in groups of 1–5 calls/call group. Advertisement call repetition rate ranges from 1–3 calls/ min. (mean 1.8 calls/min.; SD=0.9, N=8). It consists of a pulsed structure with no noticeable modulation. Note duration ranges from 405–701 ms (mean 533 ms; SD=70.7; N=8), with a mean time interval of 388 ms (SD=121.3; N=8); dominant frequency ranges from 2.25–2.93 kHz (mean 2.63 kHz; SD=0.2; N=8). The mean pulse repetition rate is 246.0 pulses/sec. (SD=41.9; N=8), and the mean number of pulses per call is 129.3 (SD=27.4; N=8).
The other two types of notes could be released intermingled with note A in variable sequences, such as BAAA/BAA/BA or AAAB/AA, rarely AAC/AC. Note B (Figure 7) may be executed 0–3 times per call, having a pulsed structure and showing both frequency and intensity modulation between the first and second thirds of the note (at the beginning slightly lower than 1 kHz). Note duration ranges from 513–993 ms (mean 825 ms; SD=50.7; N=3), with a mean time interval of 679 ms; dominant frequency peaked at 1.0 kHz (SD=0; N=3). The mean pulse repetition rate is 85 pulses/sec., and the mean number of pulses per call is 70. Note C (Figure 8) is seldom released (N= 3 males), and it may be emitted alone or just after either a note B (usually) or A (rarely). It presents a pulsed structure, resembling a less intense and shorter note B. Note duration ranges from 219–594 ms (mean 501 ms; SD=65.1; N=2), dominant frequency ranges from 0.87–1.03 (mean 1.0 kHz; SD=0.1; N=2).
Etymology: the specific epithet “ paranaiba ” (variation “ parnaiba ”) comes from the indigenous Tupi language, and means muddy-watered or large river. It is used as a noun in apposition and refers to the Paranaíba River, which flows through most of the northern border of the Triângulo Mineiro region, and is close to the sites where the type-series of H. paranaiba was collected. The Tupi language word “ paraná ” by itself stands for the branch of a river, a water canal, or like the sea.
Distribution: Species known from the municipalities of Araguari and Ituiutaba in southeastern Brazil.
Additional remarks: Call duration and dominant frequency of H. paranaiba sp. n. coincided with those presented in Guimarães et al. (2001) for a population which they called H. multifasciatus (Table 2). Subsequently we assigned populations previously identified as H. multifasciatus, from which we have advertisement calls, in the Cerrado savanna biome of southeastern and central Brazil in the States of Minas Gerais and Goiás to H. paranaiba sp. n. Thus the name H. multifasciatus should be probably restricted to the Amazon Forest Domain. Specimens from forest environments in northeastern Brazil, State Ceará (Loebmann et al. 2007), regarded as H. multifasciatus deserve an acoustic and morphological evaluation of its taxonomic status.
Field studies are necessary to clarify if notes B and C of H. multifasciatus and H. paranaiba sp. n. can be regarded as aggressive calls (sensu Wells 2007), as well as the precise role of H. multifasciatus note D.
description: Published as part of Carvalho, Thiago Ribeiro De, Giaretta, Ariovaldo Antonio & Facure, Kátia Gomes, 2010, A new species of Hypsiboas Wagler (Anura: Hylidae) closely related to H. multifasciatus Günther from southeastern Brazil, pp. 37-52 in Zootaxa 2521 on pages 38-47, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.196269