Campoplex Gravenhorst 1829
Creators: name: Han, Yuan-Yuan
name: Achterberg, Kees Van
name: Chen, Xue-Xin
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hymenoptera
Ichneumonidae
Campoplex

description: Key to species of Campoplex Gravenhorst from China
1. Face rugose to rugose-punctate (Fig. 66E); pronotum punctate, rugulose-punctate or rugose-punctate dorsally; metanotum rugose to rugose-punctate; mesopleuron punctate to rugose-punctate, punctures dense (Fig. 66B); propodeum strongly rugose, area superomedia rugulose to trans-striate (Fig. 66C)......................................................... 2
-. Face granulose to granulose-punctate (Fig. 2E), sometimes punctate; pronotum usually granulose to granulose-punctate dorsally, sometimes punctate dorsally, rarely rugulose or rugulose-punctate, never rugose; metanotum usually granulose; mesopleuron usually granulose, punctures sparse to dense (Fig. 2B); propodeum granulose to rugose, area superomedia usually granulose (Fig. 2C).................................................................................... 6
2. Clypeus rugose; malar space rugulose; epicnemial carina with a notch-like constriction near fore coxa; fore wing areolet small, shorter than stalk................................................................. C. homonae (Sonan, 1930)
-. Clypeus without rugae (Fig. 66E; but rugose-punctate in C. xizangensis sp. nov.); malar space nearly smooth to granulose; epicnemial carina without a notch-like constriction near fore coxa; fore wing areolet large, longer than stalk............. 3
3. Clypeus punctate, truncated apically (Fig. 66E); mandible without lamella (Fig. 66E); occipital carina reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base; pronotum rugose-punctate dorsally; mesoscutum not rugose in notaulic region (Fig. 66G); propodeal median area not depressed (Fig. 66C); sixth and seventh metasomal tergites with emarginations medially................................................................................................ C. plicopunctatus sp. nov.
-. Clypeus granulose-punctate or rugose-punctate, slightly arched to arched (Fig. 82E); mandible with lamella; occipital carina reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base; pronotum punctate to rugulose-punctate dorsally; mesoscutum rugose in notaulic region; propodeal median area moderately to deeply depressed; sixth and seventh metasomal tergites without emarginations medially............................................................................................ 4
4. Clypeus rugose-punctate (Fig. 82E); malar space nearly smooth; frons with median carina absent (Fig. 82E); interocellar distance 1.3× ocello-ocular distance (Fig. 82F); pronotum rugulose-punctate dorsally; propodeal area superomedia rugulose (Fig. 82C)............................................................................. C. xizangensis sp. nov.
-. Clypeus granulose-punctate (Fig. 76E); malar space granulose; frons with median carina present; interocellar distance 1.8–2.0× ocello-ocular distance; pronotum punctate dorsally; propodeal area superomedia rugose to trans-rugose................. 5
5. Face rugose (Fig. 76E); scutellum rugose-punctate; mesopleuron rugose-punctate, striations extending to prepectal carina (Fig. 76B); latero-longitudinal carina present (Fig. 76C); first metasomal segment with dorso-lateral carina absent (Fig. 76H); second metasomal tergite apically and third tergite apico-laterally reddish brown......................... C. strigatus sp. nov.
-. Face rugose-punctate (Fig. 70E); scutellum granulose-punctate anteriorly, rugose posteriorly; mesopleuron punctate, striations not extending to prepectal carina (Fig. 70B); latero-longitudinal carina absent (Fig. 70C); first metasomal segment with dorsolateral carina present (Fig. 70H); metasoma entirely black................................ C. pseudostrigatus sp. nov.
6. Propodeal medio-longitudinal carina widely diverging posteriorly and often weak to absent (Fig. 54C); area superomedia not well formed, sometimes carina stronger where propodeum strongly rugose to striate; otherwise weakly rugose to granulose.. ................................................................................................... 7
-. Propodeal medio-longitudinal carina distinct and not widely diverging posteriorly, parallel-sided or somewhat parallel-sided (Fig. 20C); junction between area superomedia and area petiolaris discernible and area superomedia well formed; propodeum always distinctly granulose............................................................................. 15
7. All propodeal carinae very weakly developed (Fig. 22C); area basalis confluent with area superomedia area (Fig. 22C); area petiolaris granulose-rugulose (Fig. 22C); propodeal median area flat (Fig. 22C); fore wing areolet absent (Fig. 22A)......................................................................................... C. confluentus sp. nov.
-. At least some propodeal carinae distinctly developed (Fig. 54C); area basalis separated from area superomedia area; propodeal area petiolaris trans-striate or granulose (except C. obtusoclypeus sp. nov.); median area usually depressed; fore wing areolet present.............................................................................................. 8
8. Clypeus smooth and shiny below; interocellar distance approx. 0.8× ocello-ocular distance (Fig. 54F); area petiolaris granulose-rugulose (Fig. 54C); propodeal median and lateral longitudinal carinae absent (Fig. 54C).... C. obtusoclypeus sp. nov.
-. Clypeus entirely mat; interocellar distance 1.0–1.7× ocello-ocular distance; area petiolaris trans-striate or granulose; propodeal median longitudinal carina absent to weakly developed under costula, but gradually stronger developed apically, lateral longitudinal carina absent or present.......................................................................... 9
9. Malar space 0.8× basal width of mandible (Fig. 34E); latero-longitudinal carina absent (Fig. 34C); fore wing areolet without stalk (Fig. 34A); hind femur blackish brown (Fig. 33)....................................... C. grandicella sp. nov.
-. Malar space 0.33–0.6× basal width of mandible; latero-longitudinal carina usually present; fore wing areolet with stalk; hind femur yellowish brown to reddish brown (except C. angustaulacis sp. nov.)...................................... 10
10. Interocellar distance approx. 1.0× ocello-ocular distance and 1.4× distance between median and lateral ocelli (Fig. 64F); propodeal latero-longitudinal carina strongly developed (Fig. 64C); fore wing areolet emitting 2m-cu vein from its basal part (Fig. 64A)................................................................................ C. protenus sp. nov.
-. Interocellar distance 0.8–1.7× ocello-ocular distance and 1.3–2.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli; latero-longitudinal carina absent to weakly developed; fore wing areolet emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part..................... 11
11. Propodeum nearly entirely granulose (Fig. 12C); propodeal median area broadly and shallowly depressed (Fig. 12C); area petiolaris granulose (Fig. 12C); second metasomal tergite 0.6–0.7× as long as first tergite........... C. apacicarinatus sp. nov.
-. Propodeum sculpture coarser, not entirely granulose; propodeal median area nearly flat to narrowly and deeply depressed; area petiolaris trans-striate; second metasomal tergite 0.8–0.9× as long as first tergite.................................. 12
12. Mesopleuron and metapleuron strongly and densely granulose, as remainder of mesosoma, dull; propodeum granulose-rugose with a median groove................................................................................. 13
-. Mesopleuron and metapleuron weakly granulose, weaker than remainder of mesosoma; propodeum rugose to granulose-rugose, median area nearly flat........................................................................... 14
13. Interocellar distance approx. 2.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli (Fig. 10F); mesopleuron granulose-punctate (Fig. 10B); propodeal median area deeply depressed (Fig. 10C); fore and mid coxae brown (Fig. 9); hind femur blackish brown (Fig. 9).............................................................................. C. angustaulacis sp. nov.
-. Interocellar distance approx. 1.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli (Fig. 56F); mesopleuron granulose to rugulosepunctate (Fig. 56B); propodeal median area moderately depressed (Fig. 56C); fore and mid coxae yellow (Fig. 55); hind femur yellowish brown (Fig. 55)............................................... C. oriens Maheshwary & Gupta, 1977
14. Face granulose medially and rugulose laterally; clypeus strongly granulose; propodeum area dentipara finely granulose; posterior transverse carina making an angle of 80° with pleural carina................ C. chiuae Maheshwary & Gupta, 1977
-. Face finely granulose medially and mat laterally; clypeus mat granulose, with scattered punctures; propodeum area dentipara rugose; posterior transverse carina making an angle of 60° with pleural carina................. C. sauteri (Uchida, 1932)
15. Face and mesoscutum finely punctate; temple punctate; second metasomal tergite punctate; scape and pedicel yellowish brown; hind femur black.............................................................. C. graphoritae (Uchida, 1942)
-. Face and mesoscutum with different sculpture, not finely punctate; temple usually granulose; second metasomal tergite granulose; scape and pedicel yellowish brown to blackish brown; hind femur yellowish brown to black..................... 16
16. Length of body 3.0– 4.5 mm; trans-striations under tegula usually weak; fore wing areolet absent or present with 3rs-m vein incomplete; tarsal claws pectinate and with very weakly developed teeth........................................ 17
-. Length of body 3.6–8.0 mm; trans-striations under tegula usually normally developed; fore wing areolet present; tarsal claws variable............................................................................................ 21
17. Propodeal area superomedia long and narrow; latero-longitudinal carina absent; area petiolaris trans-striate; nervellus intercepted little below middle............................................................................. 18
-. Propodeal area superomedia normally developed; latero-longitudinal carina present; area petiolaris trans-striate or not; nervellus intercepted at lower 0.1–0.3......................................................................... 19
18. Areolet absent (Fig. 72A); malar space approx. 0.6× basal width of mandible (Fig. 72E); propodeal area superomedia incompletely formed (Fig. 72C); temple not swollen behind eyes (Fig. 72F); hind femur yellowish brown (Fig. 71)............................................................................................... C. assosae Kittel, 2016
-. Areolet present with 3rs-m vein incomplete; malar space approx. equal to basal width of mandible; area superomedia completely formed; temple swollen behind eyes; hind femur brownish............. C. pygmaeus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977
19. Occipital carina reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base; external angles of second discal cell acute (60°) (Fig. 4A); hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.1 (Fig. 4A); tarsal claws not pectinate; first metasomal segment with dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove (Fig. 4H); second tergite approx. 3.0× longer than its apical width............ C. acarus sp. nov.
-. Occipital carina reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base; external angles of second discal cell acute (70°); hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.2–0.3; tarsal claws pectinate but teeth weak; first metasomal segment without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove; second tergite 1.0–1.1× longer than its apical width.................................... 20
20. Propodeal area petiolaris weakly rugose (Fig. 28C); median area slightly depressed (Fig. 28C); costula absent (Fig. 28C); hind femur approx. 4.6× longer than wide; hind femur black (Fig. 27); metasoma entirely black (Fig. 27)..... C. exareola sp. nov.
-. Propodeal area petiolaris trans-striate (Fig. 36C); median area not depressed (Fig. 36C); costula present (Fig. 36C); hind femur approx. 4.0× longer than wide; hind femur yellowish brown (Fig. 35); metasoma not entirely black (Fig. 35)................................................................................................ C. granulosus sp. nov.
21. Clypeus long, sharp apically (Fig. 46E); malar space 0.9× basal width of mandible (Fig. 46E); temple swollen behind eyes (Fig. 46F); trans-striations below tegula short and weak (Fig. 46B); mesopleural fovea absent (Fig. 46B); area petiolaris granuloserugulose (Fig. 46C); medio-longitudinal carina developed below costulae and absent apically (Fig. 46C); fore wing areolet emitting 2m-cu from its middle (Fig. 46A); external angles of second discal cell vertical (Fig. 46A); hind wing with nervellus intercepted slightly below middle (Fig. 46A); sixth and seventh metasomal tergites with emarginations medially; tegula black (Fig. 46G)........................................................................ C. longiclypeus sp. nov.
-. Clypeus short, usually not sharp apically; malar space less than 0.9× basal width of mandible; temple swollen or not swollen behind eyes; trans-striations below tegula short and weak to long and strong; mesopleural fovea present; area petiolaris not granulose-rugulose; medio-longitudinal carina completely developed or weakly developed below costulae and gradually stronger apically; fore wing areolet usually emitting 2m-cu from its apical part; external angles of second discal cell acute; hind wing with nervellus usually intercepted below; sixth and seventh metasomal tergites usually without emarginations medially; tegula usually not black..................................................................................... 22
22. Clypeus finely granulose (Fig. 18E); area petiolaris granulose medially and rugose laterally (Fig. 18C); propodeal latero-longitudinal carina absent (Fig. 18C); fore wing areolet emitting 2m-cu from its basal part (Fig. 18A); metasoma from third tergite on strongly compressed............................................................... C. collucatus sp. nov.
-. Clypeus granulose to punctate; area petiolaris not granulose medially and rugose laterally; propodeal latero-longitudinal carina present (except in C. tanae sp. nov.); fore wing areolet usually emitting 2m-cu from its apical part; metasoma from third tergite on moderately compressed or not compressed.............................................................. 23
23. Antenna with first flagellomere as long as second flagellomere; clypeus punctate; frons rugose-punctate (Fig. 62E); metanotum shallowly punctate; external angles of second discal cell acute (50°) (Fig. 62A); sixth and seventh metasomal tergites with weak emarginations medially............................................................... C. proportionis sp. nov.
-. Antenna with first flagellomere usually longer than second flagellomere; clypeus granulose, granulose-punctate or punctate; frons granulose to rugose-punctate; metanotum granulose to rugose-punctate; external angles of second discal cell acute (60– 75°); sixth and seventh metasomal tergites without emarginations medially (except in C. bazariae).................... 24
24. Intercocellar distance approx. 2.1× ocello-ocular distance (Fig. 32F); occipital carina gradually narrowed dorsally; hind wing with nervellus intercepted above its middle (Fig. 32A); thyridium large; mandible except teeth black (Fig. 32E)........................................................................................... C. grandialphus sp. nov.
-. Intercocellar distance 0.8–1.8× ocello-ocular distance; occipital carina evenly arched; hind wing with nervellus intercepted at or below the middle; thyridium small; mandible except teeth yellowish brown.................................... 25
25. Malar space granulose-punctate (Fig. 6D); frons rugose-punctate; propodeal area petiolaris rugulose-punctate (Fig. 6C); antenna brown (Fig. 5).............................................................. C. adustantennalis sp. nov.
-. Malar space, frons and propodeal area petiolaris with different sculpture; antenna black (except in C. liuae sp. nov.)...... 26
26. Body length 3.6–4.8 mm; clypeus with apical margin truncated or almost truncated; temple slightly swollen to swollen; hind femur 3.8–4.6× longer than wide; tarsal claws pectinate with weakly developed teeth; thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite by its length................................................................................. 27
-. Body length 3.8–8.0 mm; clypeus with apical margin truncated to arched; temple not swollen; hind femur 4.0–5.0× longer than wide; tarsal claws pectinate with weak to strong teeth; position of thyridium variable............................... 30
27. First flagellomere approx. as long as second flagellomere; pronotum rugulose dorsally; mesopleuron punctate (Fig. 44B); propodeal area superomedia smooth and shiny, weakly rugulose-granulose (Fig. 44C); propodeal latero-longitudinal carina weak (Fig. 44C); fore wing vein 1cu-a distad of M&RS by 0.2 of its length (Fig. 44A); third metasomal tergite as long as wide apically............................................................................... C. lobatus sp. nov.
-. First flagellomere 1.2–1.4× longer than second flagellomere; pronotum not rugulose dorsally; mesopleuron granulose, granulose-punctate or rugose-punctate; propodeal area superomedia mat, granulose; propodeal latero-longitudinal carina strong; fore wing vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS; third metasomal tergite 0.6–0.7× as long as its apical width........................ 28
28. Malar space approx. 0.7× basal width of mandible (Fig. 16E); mandible with upper tooth as long as its lower tooth (Fig. 16E); temple slightly swollen behind eyes (Fig. 16F); pronotum rugulose-punctate dorsally................ C. atricrus sp. nov.
-. Malar space approx. 0.5× basal width of mandible; mandible with upper tooth longer than its lower tooth; temple swollen behind eyes; pronotum granulose dorsally................................................................... 29
29. Mesoscutum and scutellum granulose-punctate (Fig. 24G); mesopleuron granulose-punctate (Fig. 24B); hind wing with nervellus inclivous (Fig. 24A); inner spur of hind tibia approx. 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus; dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove of first metasomal segment present (Fig. 24H); metasoma entirely black (Fig. 23); mid femur brownish, hind femur blackish brown (Fig. 23)............................................................. C. cyclus sp. nov.
-. Mesoscutum and scutellum granulose (Fig. 68G); mesopleuron granulose (Fig. 68B); hind wing with nervellus vertical (Fig. 68A); inner spur of hind tibia approx. 0.6× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus; dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove of first metasomal segment absent (Fig. 68H); metasoma not entirely black (Fig. 67); mid and hind femur yellowish brown (Fig. 67).............................................................................. C. pseudocyclus sp. nov.
30. Propodeal area petiolaris granulose (Fig. 78C); hind wing nervellus vertical (Fig. 78A); hind femur blackish brown (Fig. 77); hind tibia clearly banded (Fig. 77).......................................................... C. taenius sp. nov.
-. Propodeal area petiolaris not granulose; hind wing nervellus usually inclivous; hind femur yellowish brown to blackish; colour of hind tibia variable.................................................................................. 31
31. Propodeal area superomedia granulose-rugulose (Fig. 30C); fore wing marginal cell with distal part of surrounding vein approx. 2.5× longer than proximal one (Fig. 30A); fore wing vein 1cu-a distad of M&RS by approx. 0.3 of its length (Fig. 30A); metasoma entirely granulose except petiole; thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite by approx. 0.6× of its length; tegula blackish brown (Fig. 30G).............................................................. C. granalvus sp. nov.
-. Propodeal area superomedia usually granulose; fore wing marginal cell with distal part of surrounding vein 1.5–2.0× longer than proximal one; fore wing vein 1cu-a opposite or slightly distad of M&RS; metasoma usually only postpetiole and second tergite granulose; thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite by at least its length; tegula yellow to yellowish brown..32
32. Face finely coriaceous, densely punctate; interocellar area distinctly punctate; second and subsequent metasomal tergites finely coriaceous; sixth and seventh metasomal tergites with emarginations medially.................. C. bazariae Sheng, 2014
-. Face granulose to granulose punctate; interocellar area granulose; second and subsequent metasomal tergites mat to coriaceous; sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially.................................................... 33
33. First flagellomere as long as second flagellomere; propodeal area basalis with distinct carina posteriorly (Fig. 42C); propodeal area petiolaris granulose, rugose laterally (Fig. 42C); antenna brown (Fig. 41); postpetiole yellowish brown (Fig. 41).............................................................................................. C. liuae sp. nov.
-. First flagellomere longer than second flagellomere; propodeal area basalis without carina posteriorly; propodeal area petiolaris usually trans-striate; antenna black; postpetiole black........................................................ 34
34. Malar space smooth; area petiolaris rugulose-granulose (Fig. 60C); hind wing with nervellus vertical (Fig. 60A); metasoma from third tergite on yellowish brown laterally and remainder of metasoma black (Fig. 59)...... C. perpendicularis sp. nov.
-. Malar space sculptured; area petiolaris not rugulose-granulose; hind wing with nervellus usually inclivous; metasoma usually entirely black....................................................................................... 35
35. Metanotum granulose-rugose; propodeal area superomedia rugulose (Fig. 38C); hind leg except coxa and telotarsi yellow...................................................................................... C. galbipedis sp. nov.
-. Metanotum not granulose-rugose; propodeal area superomedia not rugulose; hind leg sometimes with femur black, tibia not entirely yellow and tarsus usually wholly blackish brown..................................................... 36
36. Malar space shiny, approx. 0.3× basal width of mandible; mandible with upper tooth longer than lower tooth; basal 0.7 of mid femur blackish brown (Fig. 13).......................................................... C. artivultus sp. nov.
-. Malar space not shiny, 0.45–0.8× basal width of mandible; mandible with upper tooth usually as long as lower tooth; mid femur usually yellowish brown............................................................................... 37
37. Frons with median carina present; metasoma not entirely black................................................ 38
-. Frons with median carina absent; metasoma entirely black.................................................... 40
38. Face granulose-punctate (Fig. 50E); metanotum rugose-punctate; thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite by its diameter; fore and mid coxae blackish; metasoma black with second tergite laterally yellowish brown (Fig. 49)............................................................................................... C. medicarinatus sp. nov.
-. Face granulose; metanotum granulose; thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite equal or more than its diameter; fore and mid coxae at least apically yellow; metasoma from third tergite on laterally yellowish brown..................... 39
39. Interocellar distance approx. 1.8× ocello-ocular distance and 2.3× distance between median and lateral ocelli (Fig. 26F); occipital carina reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base; pronotum punctate dorsally; mesopleuron granulose-punctate with punctures dense, punctures separated less than their diameter (Fig. 26B); metapleuron punctate (Fig. 26B); propodeal area petiolaris trans-striate (Fig. 26C); propodeal latero-longitudinal carina present (Fig. 26C).......... C. densipunctatus sp. nov.
-. Interocellar distance approx. equal to ocello-ocular distance and 1.4× distance between median and lateral ocelli (Fig. 80E); occipital carina reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base; pronotum granulose dorsally; mesopleuron granulose with punctures sparse, punctures separated large than their diameter (Fig. 80B); metapleuron granulose (Fig. 80B); propodeal area petiolaris rugose (Fig. 80C); propodeal latero-longitudinal carina absent (Fig. 80C).................... C. tanae sp. nov.
40. Malar space 0.45× basal width of mandible (Fig. 2E); mandible with upper tooth slightly longer than lower tooth; trans-striations below tegula weak (Fig. 2B); propodeal area petiolaris rugose (Fig. 2C); second metasomal tergite 0.9× as long as first tergite................................................................................ C. absitus sp. nov.
-. Malar space more than 0.45× basal width of mandible; mandible with upper tooth as long as lower tooth; trans-striations below tegula weak to strong; propodeal area petiolaris usually trans-striate; second metasomal tergite usually less than 0.9× first tergite............................................................................................... 41
41. Propodeal area superomedia rugose; fore wing pterostigma whitish basally; areolet emitting 2m-cu vein from its middle part; fore and mid coxae yellow........................................................ C. egregius (Kokujev, 1915)
-. Propodeal area superomedia granulose; fore wing pterostigma usually not whitish basally; areolet emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part; fore and mid coxae usually black.............................................................. 42
42. Hind femur black; hind tibia clearly banded, yellowish brown medially......................................... 43
-. Hind femur yellowish brown; hind tibia usually not clearly banded, unicolored or infuscated apically.................. 46
43. Interocellar distance approx. 1.3× ocello-ocular distance (Fig. 48F); propodeal petiolar area rugose (Fig. 48C); all trochanters blackish brown................................................................. C. maurotrochanter sp. nov.
-. Interocellar distance 0.8–1.1× ocello-ocular distance; propodeal petiolar area trans-striate; not all trochanters blackish brown. .................................................................................................. 44
44. Malar space approx. 0.8× basal width of mandible; metapleuron and propodeum coarsely granulose, sculpture different from mesopleuron; middle femur with a basal black ring....................... C. maximalus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977
-. Malar space 0.5–0.7× basal width of mandible; metapleuron and propodeum with normally granulose, sculpture more or less resembling to that of mesopleuron; middle femur entirely yellowish brown...................................... 45
45. Clypeus with apical margin truncated (Fig. 58E); pronotum granulose with sparse punctures dorsally; hind wing with nervellus inclivous (Fig. 58A).................................................................. C. parassosae sp. nov.
-. Clypeus with apical margin slightly arched; pronotum rugulose-mat dorsally; hind wing with nervellus vertical......................................................................... C. septentrionalis Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977
46. Clypeus with apical margin truncate (Fig. 74E); propodeal area petiolaris strongly rugose (Fig. 74C); first metasomal segment without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove (Fig. 74H); fore wing pterostigma whitish basally (Fig. 74A); fore and mid trochanters and trochantellus brown....................................................... C. shanxiensis sp. nov.
-. Clypeus with apical margin slightly arched to arched; propodeal area petiolaris trans-striate; first metasomal segment with dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove; fore wing pterostigma not whitish basally; fore and mid trochanters and trochantellus yellow to yellowish brown............................................................................. 47
47. Pronotum punctate dorsally; mesopleuron punctate; hind femur 4.0–4.1× longer than wide.......................... 48
-. Pronotum granulose dorsally; mesopleuron granulose to granulose-punctate; hind femur 4.5–5.0× longer than wide...... 49
48. Frons granulose-punctate (Fig. 20E); propodeum compact (Fig. 20C); hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.1 of its length (Fig. 20A); thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite by 1.5× its diameter; third tergite approx. 0.6× as long as its apical width; scape and pedicel brown (Fig. 20E); fore and mid coxae brown.................... C. concretus sp. nov.
-. Frons granulose; propodeum not compact; hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.3 of its length (Fig. 52A); thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite by its diameter; third tergite approx. 0.8× as long as its apical width; scape and pedicel yellowish brown anteriorly and brown dorsally (Fig. 52E); fore and mid coxae yellow............ C. monochroma sp. nov.
49. Propodeal sculpture similar to that on mesopleuron and metapleuron; propodeal area dentipara granulose (Fig. 40C); second metasomal tergite approx. 0.6× as long as first tergite.............................................. C. hei sp. nov.
-. Propodeal sculpture coarser to that on mesopleuron and metapleuron; propodeal area dentipara granulose-rugose; second metasomal tergite 0.7–0.9× as long as first tergite............................................................... 50
50. Punctures of mesopleuron large and dense (Fig. 84B); all propodeal carinae strong (Fig. 84C); malar space yellowish brown (Fig. 84E)....................................................................... C. xuthomelonus sp. nov.
-. Punctures of mesopleuron small and sparse (Fig. 8B); all propodeal carinae relatively weak (Fig. 8C); malar space black (Fig. 8E)............................................................... C. anatolus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977
description: Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 4-8, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939