Aphanogmus lateritorum Salden & Peters 2023, sp. nov.
Creators: name: Salden, Tobias
name: Peters, Ralph S.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2023
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hymenoptera
Ceraphronidae
Aphanogmus
Aphanogmus lateritorum

description: Aphanogmus lateritorum sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 34A3F427-5283-4623-978B-295D8A52EE93
Fig. 8
Diagnosis
Scape longer than F1 and F2 combined; OOL:LOL 2.33; preoccipital furrow distinct, with interocellar pit; preoccipital carina distinct; head width 1.31× mesosoma width. Male genitalia: harpe finger-shaped apicoventrally in ventral and dorsal view and slightly broadened at apex in lateral view; harpe/gvc index 0.37; ventromedial margins of harpes not touching at distoventral margin of gvc, ventromedial margin of harpe convex in basal quarter, concave in middle part, straight and oriented distolaterally in short apical part; ventral margin of harpe straight in basal half, concave in apical half, dorsal margin indistinct in basal part, concave in middle part and straight and oriented distoventrally in apical quarter, lateral margin straight in basal quarter, slightly concave and oriented distomedially in apical three quarters.
Etymology
The species is named after the common tropical reddish soil type laterite, on which the species was collected.
Material examined
Holotype
TANZANIA • ♂; Kilimanjaro Region, Mount Kilimanjaro; 3°17′57.6 S, 37°36′58.6 E; 1303 m a.s.l.; 10 Jun. 2011; KiLi project leg.; “high 3”; GRA5, grasland; Coloured pan trap; ZFMK; ZFMK- HYM-00037053.
Description
Male
BODY LENGTH. 0.69 mm.
COLOUR. Head brown, mesosoma brown, metasoma light brown except anterior third lighter; scape yellowish and pedicel light brown, flagellum light brown, gradually darkening from F1 to F9; legs yellowish transparent except pro- and mesocoxa light brown; fore wing venation light brown, fore and hind wing disc slightly melanized, fore wing at proximal part less melanized.
ANTENNA. 11-segmented, flagellomeres trapezoidal; scape 4.0× as long as pedicel, scape as long as F1 and F2 combined, F1 2.2× as long as pedicel, F1 1.3× as long as F2, F1 shorter than F7 and F8 combined, F1 shorter than F9, F6 shorter than F7 and F8 combined; numerous distinctly small multiporous plates on flagellomeres, sensillae on flagellomeres erect and longer than width of flagellomeres.
HEAD. Head width 1.15 × head height; head width 1.81 × interorbital space; maximum eye diameter 1.18 × minimum eye diameter; head height 1.65 × maximum eye diameter. Dorsal margin of occipital carina ventral to dorsal margin of lateral ocellus in lateral view; preoccipital furrow distinct, with interocellar pit; preoccipital carina distinct. OOL:POL:LOL 1.00:0.71:0.43; OOL 1.75 × lateral ocellus diameter. White, thick setae on upper face absent; supraclypeal depression present; lateral margin of torulus slightly raised; intertorular carina present; posterolateral processes of gena absent.
MESOSOMA, METASOMA. Mesosoma compressed laterally. Head width 1.31 × mesosoma width; Weber length 231 µm. Mesoscutum densely setose, setae curved backwards; median mesoscutal sulcus absent; interaxillar sulcus superficial, scutoscutellar sulcus not adjacent to transscutal articulation, scutoscutellar sulcus straight; dorsal axillar area setose, setae curved backwards; mesoscutellum setose, setae curved backwards or straight. Mesoscutum width 1.80× mesoscutellum width; posterior mesoscutal width 1.33 × mesoscutellum width; mesoscutellum length 1.67 × mesoscutellum width; mesoscutellum length 1.25 × posterior mesoscutal width; Weber length 1.37 × mesoscutum width; Weber length 1.48 × mesoscutellum length. Anteromedian projection of the metanoto-propodeo-metapecto-mesopectal complex absent; mesometapleural sulcus absent; posterior propodeal projection absent; posterior mesosomal comb absent. Basal transverse carina of petiole (on syntergum) absent; longitudinal carinae on syntergum absent; translucent patches on metasoma absent.
FORE WING. Length 2.98 × width; stigmal vein slightly longer thanpterostigma marginal length.
MALE GENITALIA. Genital length 100 µm; Weber length 2.31 × genital length; gvc width 50 µm; genital length 2.00× gvc width; gvc width three quarters of gvc length; gvc width 1.14 × distal gvc width. Proximodorsal margin of gvc slightly convex; distodorsal margin of gvc descending proximomedially (Fig. 8C); proximoventral margin of gvc straight; distoventral margin of gvc descending proximomedially (Fig. 8A); ventral area of gvc slightly convex; dorsal area of gvc slightly convex (Fig. 8B); proximolateral margin of gvc ascending ventrally; distolateral margin of gvc slightly convex (Fig. 8B). Harpe finger-shaped apicoventrally in ventral and dorsal view and slightly broadened at apex in lateral view; harpe/ gvc index 0.37; lateral articulation site of harpe with gvc not flush (Fig. 8A, C); ventral margin of harpe straight in basal half, concave in apical half, dorsal margin indistinct in basal part, concave in middle part and straight and oriented distoventrally in apical quarter (Fig. 8B), lateral margin straight in basal quarter, slightly concave and oriented distomedially in apical three quarters, widest point of harpe at lateral articulation site with gvc (Fig. 8A, C); ventromedial margins of harpes not touching at distoventral margin of gvc, ventromedial margin of harpe convex in basal quarter, concave in middle part, straight and oriented distolaterally in short apical part (Fig. 8C), apex of harpe pointed, oriented distolaterally (Fig. 8A, C). Harpe with at least one lateral seta restricted to basal third, longest lateral seta less than half as long as harpe, lateral seta oriented distolaterally; harpe with at least one ventral seta restricted to basal half, longest ventral seta more than half as long as harpe, ventral seta oriented distolaterally and distoventrally; harpe with at least three apical setae, longest apical setae less than one quarter as long as harpe, apical setae oriented distodorsally and distolaterally. Aedeagus + gonossiculus length less than half as long as harpe, apex of aedeagus + gonossiculus indistinct (Fig. 8A, C) and dorsal to apex of harpe. Aedeagus + gonossiculus with at least two distinct digital teeth, oriented ventrolaterally. Genitalia weakly sclerotized with strongest sclerotization at aedeagus + gonossiculus.
Female
Unknown.
Variation
Unknown.
Biology
Host unknown, specimen collected with coloured pan trap.
Distribution
Afrotropical: Tanzania.
Remarks
Comparison with similar species
See remarks under A. abaluhya sp. nov. and A. ikhongamurwi sp. nov.
Condition of type material
In the holotype, the proximal margin of the gvc is slightly deformed but condition still allows precise descriptions. The flagellomeres are deformed, thus the width specifications are not precise. The left hind leg is missing (except coxa). Both fore wings and the right hind wing are detached. The metasoma is slightly deformed and detached, thus the body length measurement is not precise.
description: Published as part of Salden, Tobias & Peters, Ralph S., 2023, Afrotropical Ceraphronoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera) put back on the map with the description of 88 new species, pp. 1-386 in European Journal of Taxonomy 884 (1) on pages 38-41, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.884.2181, http://zenodo.org/record/8177941