Land Use in North-Central Arizona: An Archaeological Survey of Navajo Army Depot, Coconino County, Arizona
Creators: name: Grenda, Donn R.
Publisher: name: SRI Press
Year: 1993
Subjects: subject: Neill Flat
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/82606/neill-flat
subject: Bellemont
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/82605/bellemont
subject: Tappen Spring
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/82608/tappen-spring
subject: Indian Village
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/82607/indian-village
subject: Mickle Tank
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/82609/mickle-tank
subject: Flagstaff, AZ
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/79516/flagstaff-az
subject: Navajo Army Depot
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/82604/navajo-army-depot
subject: Williams, AZ
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/82603/williams-az
subject: Archaic Period
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/temporal-keyword/5726/archaic-period
subject: Historic
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/temporal-keyword/5728/historic
subject: Yavapai
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/temporal-keyword/2821/yavapai
subject: Protohistoric
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/culture-keyword/77/protohistoric
subject: Historic Native American
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/culture-keyword/30/historic-native-american
subject: Yavapai
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/culture-keyword/71/yavapai
subject: Archaic
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/culture-keyword/8/archaic
subject: Historic
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/culture-keyword/25/historic
subject: Late Archaic
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/culture-keyword/11/late-archaic
subject: Euroamerican
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/culture-keyword/28/euroamerican
subject: Navajo Village
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/80276/navajo-village
subject: AZ I:13:52
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/80275/az-i1352
subject: Hopi Village
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/80278/hopi-village
subject: AZ I:13:53
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/80277/az-i1353
subject: New Indian Village
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/80280/new-indian-village
subject: AZ 1:13:54
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/80279/az-11354
subject: AZ I:13:55
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/80281/az-i1355
subject: AZ I:13:45
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/80284/az-i1345
subject: AZ I:13:43
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/97436/az-i1343
subject: AZ I:13:44
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/80283/az-i1344
subject: AZ I:13:47
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/80286/az-i1347
subject: AZ I:13:51
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/97438/az-i1351
subject: AZ I:13:46
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/80285/az-i1346
subject: AZ I:13:49
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/97437/az-i1349
subject: AZ I:13:42
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/80288/az-i1342
subject: AZ I:13:48
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/80287/az-i1348
subject: AZ I:13:50
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/80290/az-i1350
subject: AZ I:13:41
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/80291/az-i1341
subject: Hamlet / Village
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/254/hamlet-village
subject: Domestic Structures
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/256/domestic-structures
subject: Military Structure
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/322/military-structure
subject: Archaeological Feature
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/339/archaeological-feature
subject: Artifact Scatter
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/340/artifact-scatter
subject: Non-Domestic Structures
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/309/non-domestic-structures
subject: Church / Religious Structure
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/311/church-religious-structure
subject: Domestic Structure or Architectural Complex
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/251/domestic-structure-or-architectural-complex
subject: Settlements
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/252/settlements
subject: Wood
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/15/wood
subject: Chipped Stone
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/2/chipped-stone
subject: Glass
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/6/glass
subject: Ground Stone
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/7/ground-stone
subject: Rock Alignments
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/2136/rock-alignments
subject: Metal
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/11/metal
subject: Archaeological Overview
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/1/archaeological-overview
subject: Historic Background Research
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/18/historic-background-research
subject: Data Recovery / Excavation
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/5/data-recovery-excavation
subject: Systematic Survey
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/12/systematic-survey

description: In May and June, 1992, Statistical Research conducted a cultural resource survey of approximately 1,260 acres of land owned by the U.S. Army, in Bellemont, Arizona. The survey was performed for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District. The project areas are used by the military as training/bivouac sites and were not randomly selected for survey. The survey was conducted on two separate occasions by a crew of 4-5 including the project director. The field work documented four prehistoric sites, 11 historic sites, and nine isolated finds. The prehistoric sites consisted of stationary grinding features and artifact scatters. Historic sites consisted of lumber camps, fencelines, trash scatters, rock features, and villages. Ethnographic models of Yavapai subsistence and settlement, were employed to form hypotheses concerning the location and function of the documented prehistoric sites. The hypotheses were then refuted or supported by the site sample from the project area. Historic land use patterns were identified and classified into sites relating to the Overland Road, ranching, lumbering, and military activities. The data collected during the field work were evaluated according to a research design testing hypotheses of regional subsistence-settlement behavior and historic land use patterns, while taking into account the existing database of archaeological and environmental knowledge and the limited nature of the survey. The results permitted the elaboration of existing models of socioeconomic adaptive processes for this portion of north-central Arizona. All sites are considered potentially eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion d, based on their potential to address important regional research issues.