Implementation and acceptability of a heart attack quality improvement intervention in India: A mixed methods analysis of the ACS QUIK trial
Creators: name: Prabhakaran, D
name: Devarajan, R
name: Baldridge, A.S
name: Reddy, K.S
name: Nambiar, A
name: Harikrishnan, S
name: Karmali, K.N
name: Aneesh, T.C.
name: the ACS QUIK Investigators
name: Labarthe, D.R
name: Zachariah, G
name: Thom, S
name: Smith, Jr., S.C
name: Manjooran, R.J
name: Huffman, M.D
name: Nallamothu, B.
name: Lloyd-Jones, D.M
name: Bonow, R.O
name: Sundaram, K.R
name: Sivasankaran, S
name: Zhao, L
name: Goenka, S
name: Alexander, T
name: Hemming, K
name: Cooper, L
name: Singh, K
name: Mohanan, P.P
name: Davies, D
name: Victorson, D.E
name: Mohanan, P.P
name: Kondal, D
name: Ali, M
name: Vijayaraghavan, G
name: Arumugan, P
Publisher: name: BioMed Central Ltd.
Year: 2019

description: Background: The ACS QUIK trial showed that a multicomponent quality improvement toolkit intervention resulted in improvements in processes of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction in Kerala but did not improve clinical outcomes in the context of background improvements in care. We describe the development of the ACS QUIK intervention and evaluate its implementation, acceptability, and sustainability. Methods: We performed a mixed methods process evaluation alongside a cluster randomized, stepped-wedge trial in Kerala, India. The ACS QUIK intervention aimed to reduce the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events at 30 days compared with usual care across 63 hospitals (n = 21,374 patients). The ACS QUIK toolkit intervention, consisting of audit and feedback report, admission and discharge checklists, patient education materials, and guidelines for the development of code and rapid response teams, was developed based on formative qualitative research in Kerala and from systematic reviews. After four or more months of the center's participation in the toolkit intervention phase of the trial, an online survey and physician interviews were administered. Physician interviews focused on evaluating the implementation and acceptability of the toolkit intervention. A framework analysis of transcripts incorporated context and intervening mechanisms. Results: Among 63 participating hospitals, 22 physicians (35%) completed online surveys. Of these, 17 (77%) respondents reported that their hospital had a cardiovascular quality improvement team, 18 (82%) respondents reported having read an audit report, admission checklist, or discharge checklist, and 19 (86%) respondents reported using patient education materials. Among the 28 interviewees (44%), facilitators of toolkit intervention implementation were physicians' support and leadership, hospital administrators' support, ease-of-use of checklists and patient education materials, and availability of training opportunities for staff. Barriers that influenced the implementation or acceptability of the toolkit intervention for physicians included time and staff constraints, Internet access, patient volume, and inadequate understanding of the quality improvement toolkit intervention. Conclusions: Implementation and acceptability of the ACS QUIK toolkit intervention were enhanced by hospital-level management support, physician and team support, and usefulness of checklists and patient education materials. Wider and longer-term use of the toolkit intervention and its expansion to potentially other cardiovascular conditions or other locations where the quality of care is not as high as in the ACS QUIK trial may be useful for improving acute cardiovascular care in Kerala and beyond.