Litoria gracilis Richards &amp; Donnellan &amp; Oliver 2023, sp. nov.
Creators: name: Richards, Stephen J.
name: Donnellan, Stephen C.
name: Oliver, Paul M.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2023
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Amphibia
Anura
Pelodryadidae
Litoria
Litoria gracilis

description: <i>Litoria gracilis</i>, sp. nov. Slender Spotted Treefrog Figs 5–7 https://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 1E175A08-DD09-44DA-9BF4-D044F0914691 <b>Holotype</b>. SAMA R71697 (SJR2297) Adult male with vocal slits and nuptial pads, small stream adjacent to road ascending Iagifu Ridge nr Moro, Southern Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea (6.3681°S, 143.2232°E; 940 m a.s.l.) by S.J. Richards on 21 October 2001. <b>Paratypes</b> (n = 12). PNGNM (FN SJR8854), SAMA R71673–4 (FN SJR2066–2067), 71677 (FN SJR4930), 71678 (FN SJR8855), 71698 (FN SJR2347) same details as holotype except R71673–4 collected on 15 May 2002, R71677 collected on 30 September 1999, PNGNM (FN8854) and R71678 on 13 November 2004 and R71698 on 22 October 2001; R71699 (FN SJR2361), adult male, Summit of Iagifu Ridge, Southern Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea (6.4446°S, 143.2193°E; 1360 m a.s.l.) by S.J. Richards on 22 October 2001; R71679–71682 (FN SJR10390, 10423–10424, 10438), PNGNM (FN SJR)10422, adult males except R71681 adult female, Juha South, Western Province, Papua New Guinea (5.9018°S, 142.4360°E; 950 m a.s.l.) by S.J. Richards 18–20 February 2008. <b>Diagnosis.</b> <i>Litoria gracilis</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> is distinguished from all other <i>Litoria</i> by the following unique combination of characters: size small (SVL of males 25.1–28.2 mm, of one female 28.6 mm); dorsum in life brown with green spots; vomerine teeth not visible; finger webbing extensive; prominent dermal fold along outer edge of foot; pigmentation on nictitating membrane restricted to narrow band at dorsal margin; advertisement call a short bleating sound lasting 0.13– 0.28 s containing 2–5 distinctly pulsed notes produced at a rate of 7.51–12.00 notes/s with dominant frequency at 3800–4000 Hz; and is genetically diagnosable from <i>L. daraiensis</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> at 46 sites and from <i>L. nigropunctata</i> at 95 sites in the 787 base pair alignment of mitochondrial <i>ND4</i> gene and flanking tRNA (Table 1). <b>Description of holotype</b>: An adult male with nuptial pads and vocal slits. Morphometric data are summarised in Table 3. Body very slender. Limbs moderately long (TL/SVL 0.52). Head moderately narrow (HW/SVL 0.26), slightly wider than long (HL/SVL 0.25, HL/HW 0.96). Vomerine teeth not visible but detectable by scraping with forceps. Tongue oval with shallow posterior notch. Vocal slits long, located laterally in floor of mouth. Snout broadly rounded with angular tip in dorsal view (Fig. 5A), steeply sloping (near truncate) in lateral view (Fig. 5B); canthus rostralis short, broadly rounded, slightly curved; loreal region steeply sloping, slightly concave; lips slightly flared; nostrils much closer to tip of snout than eyes, oriented laterally; internarial distance greater than distance from external naris to eye (EN/IN 0.82, IN/SVL 0.10, EN/SVL 0.08); eyes moderately small (EYE/SVL 0.11) but prominent, protruding in dorsal and lateral views; pupil horizontal, pigmentation on nictitating membrane restricted to narrow band along dorsal edge. Tympanum small (TYM/SVL 0.04), slightly more than one third diameter of eye (TYM/EYE = 0.39), moderately well-defined except dorsal edge obscured by short supratympanic ridge. Skin of dorsum and dorsal surfaces of limbs finely shagreened, throat finely ridged, abdomen coarsely granular. Ventral surfaces of limbs mostly smooth except numerous low but conspicuous white tubercles extending from vent distally to approximately halfway along postero-ventral margins of thighs; a dense cluster of prominent white tubercles surround vent and clump of small, low, pale tubercles on each heel; low, interrupted, white dermal fold extends along outer edge of tarsus and foot, extending from heel nearly to disc of Toe 5 but reduced to low ridge distally; row of small pale tubercles along distal-most outer edge of forearm grading into low dermal ridge along outer edge of hand, reaching nearly to base of disc on Finger 4. Fingers moderately short with expanded terminal discs (3FD/SVL 0.05) with distinct marginal grooves; distalmost subarticular tubercles on fingers 3 and 4 strongly bilobed, those on fingers 1 and 2 unilobed (Fig. 5C); relative lengths of fingers: 3&gt;4&gt;2&gt;1. Fingers extensively webbed, on Finger 4 webbing extending slightly beyond distal edge of subarticular tubercle at base of penultimate phalanx (distal subarticular tubercle), on outer edge of Finger 3 to about distal subarticular tubercle before continuing as narrow flange to base of disc, on outside of Finger 3 to slightly beyond halfway between distal subarticular tubercle and disc, and between fingers 1 and 2 reduced to basal fringe (Fig. 5C). Inner metacarpal tubercle low, elongate, outer metacarpal tubercle broad, flat. Nuptial pad pale brown, narrow, extending 1.5 mm along outer edge of Finger 1. Toes with relative lengths 4&gt;3=5&gt;2&gt;1. Webbing on inside of Toe 5 and outside of Toe 3 extending nearly to base of discs, on both sides of Toe 4 to distal edge of distalmost subarticular tubercle, on outside of Toe 2 to halfway between distal subarticular tubercle and disc, and on Toe 1 to distal subarticular tubercle. Inner metatarsal tubercle well developed, oval; no outer metatarsal tubercle. Distalmost subarticular tubercles on toes 4 and 5 bilobed, on Toe 3 partially bilobed, and on toes 1 and 2 unilobed (Fig. 5D). Tips of fingers and toes expanded into terminal discs, those of fingers slightly broader than those of toes (3FD/4TD 1.08), all with distinct marginal grooves. <i>Colour in life.</i> Pale creamy brown dorsally and laterally, overlain with numerous small green spots; small patches of brown pigmentation concentrated on dorsal surfaces of tibiae and on outer edges of tarsi; ventrolateral surfaces behind axillae with fine peppering of brown pigment; posterior surface of upper arm largely yellow; dermal folds and large tubercles surrounding vent white. Ventrally white except ventral surfaces of forelegs and upper hindlegs; fine peppering of brown pigment along lateral edges of jaw; bright yellow in groin. <i>Colour in preservative.</i> Dorsal surfaces faded pale blue with darker blue and brown patches, ventral surfaces cream, bright yellow surfaces in life faded to very pale yellow. <b>Variation.</b> Morphometric variation is limited (Table 3). The largest specimen is a female, but sexual dimorphism is slight (SVL of 12 males 25.1–28.2 mm, of one female 28.6 mm). All specimens are very slender (Fig. 6A–C), and in life exhibited a yellow patch on the posterior surfaces of the upper arm, yellow in the hidden surfaces of the legs and on the posterior of the abdomen, and green spots on the dorsum. However, the size and number of green spots was highly variable, as was the density and extent of brown pigmentation and its aggregation into discrete patches of different sizes; some specimens had limited dark-brown pigmentation (e.g., Figs 6A–B) while others exhibited numerous discrete blotches of dark brown on the dorsum (e.g., Fig. 6C) and dorsal surfaces of the limbs. <b>Advertisement call.</b> We analysed nine calls produced by the holotype at an air temperature of 21.0°C and one call produced by SAMA R71680 (Fig. 7) at an air temperature of 21.2° C. The call of <i>L. gracilis</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> is a series of 2–4 (occasionally 5) finely pulsed notes. Calls were 0.13– 0.28 s long (mean = 0.24, SD = 0.06, n = 10) and those of the holotype were produced at 9.0– 44.3 s intervals over a period of 211 s (mean inter-call interval = 25.85 s, SD = 13.66, call rate = 0.04 calls/s). Of the 10 calls analysed in detail two (20%) contained two notes, seven (70%) contained three notes and one (10%) contained four notes (Fig. 7). Eighteen additional calls from an unvouchered male that were not analysed in more detail due to their poorer quality contained 2–5 notes (two notes = 22% of calls, three notes = 39%, four notes = 33%, 5 notes = 6% (a single call)). Notes within calls were produced at a rate of 7.51–12.00 notes/s (mean = 9.52, SD = 1.38, n = 10). Note length for all 10 calls combined was 0.033 –0.057 s (mean = 0.040, SD = 0.005, n = 29) and internote interval within calls was 0.011 –0.105 s (mean = 0.062, SD = 0.025, n = 19). In all calls the last internote interval was longer than preceding intervals (Fig. 7). Notes contained 11–23 pulses (mean = 15.09, SD = 3.06, n = 21) produced at a rate of 263–458 pulses/s (mean = 359.3, SD = 50.9, n = 21). Dominant frequency was 3800–4000 Hz. <b>Comparisons.</b> In its small size (male SVL 25.1–28.2 mm, a female 28.6 mm), slender body, green and brown dorsal colour, extensively webbed fingers, and lacking a rostral spike, <i>Litoria gracilis</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> most closely resembles the following nine species: <i>L. aplini</i>, <i>L. daraiensis</i> <b>sp. nov.</b>, <i>L. iris</i>, <i>L. majikthise,</i> <i>L</i>. <i>nigropunctata</i>, <i>L. richardsi</i>, <i>L. singadanae</i>, <i>L. umarensis</i> and <i>L. verae</i>. <i>Litoria gracilis</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> is also morphologically similar to the three new species described below and is compared with them in their respective species accounts. <i>Litoria gracilis</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> differs from <i>L. aplini</i> by its smaller body size (adult males 25.1–28.2 mm vs. males 31.9–35.1 mm SVL), less prominent dermal fold along outer edges of limbs, hidden surfaces of limbs predominantly yellow (vs. predominantly blue with dark brown mottling), and advertisement call comprising 2–5 finely pulsed notes (vs. advertisement call a short buzz normally followed by 1–7 clicks); from <i>L. iris</i> by having hidden surfaces of limbs predominantly yellow (vs. posterior of thighs blue, red, or yellow, frequently blotched with white or purple), violet spots in axilla and groin absent (vs. present) and advertisement call a series of 2–5 finely pulsed notes (vs. advertisement call a series of up to 10 notes of variable length, with long notes preceding or following short notes); from <i>L. majikthise</i> by its smaller size (adult males 25.1–28.2 mm vs. 30–35 mm SVL), having posterior surfaces of thighs yellow (vs. uniform red), by lacking a pearl-white post-ocular bar (vs. present), lacking violet patches on posteroventral surfaces of abdomen (vs. present) and advertisement call a series of 2–5 finely pulsed notes (vs. advertisement call a single long (0.29– 0.36 s) or short (0.026 –0.080) note); from <i>L</i>. <i>nigropunctata</i> by its smaller, though slightly overlapping, size (male SVL 25.1–28.2 vs. 27–32 mm; Menzies 1972, 2006; Günther 2004), dermal folds along outer margins of tarsi distinctly crenulated (vs. dermal folds forming low dermal ridge), advertisement call a series of 2–5 finely pulsed notes (vs. advertisement call comprising an irregular succession of clicks and buzzes; Menzies 1972), and deep genetic divergence ((<i>dA</i> between the taxa of 0.15; see below); from <i>L. richardsi</i> and <i>L. singadanae</i> in having a smaller (TYM/EYE 0.32–0.42 vs. 0.65–0.81), pigmented (vs. substantially transparent) tympanum, and further from <i>L. richardsi</i> in lacking (vs. having) irregular black lines on dorsum and extensive black markings ventrolaterally, and from <i>L. singadanae</i> in lacking (vs. having) extensive area of orange on posteroventral surfaces in life; from <i>L. umarensis</i> in having posterior surfaces of thighs yellow (vs. brown), and dorsum brown with green spots (vs. normally uniform green); and from <i>L. verae</i> in its smaller size (<i>L. verae</i> males 33–35 mm SVL), lacking (vs. having) small brown spots aligned transversely on dorsum, and having yellow (vs. orange) on posteroventral surfaces in life. The new species is most similar to <i>L. daraiensis</i> <b>sp. nov.</b>, described above. It can be distinguished from that species by its slightly larger size (male SVL 25.1–28.2 vs. 23.9 mm), different advertisement call (a series of 2–5 finely pulsed notes vs. 10–11 distinctly pulsed chattering notes), and moderately deep genetic divergence (<i>dA</i> between the taxa of 0.08; see below). <b>Distribution and ecology.</b> <i>Litoria gracilis</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> is known from several sites across the southern foothills of Papua New Guinea’s Central Cordillera (Fig. 4) between the upper Strickland River basin in the west and the upper Kikori River basin in the east. The identity of frogs in the upper Fly River basin near the Indonesian border referred to <i>L. nigropunctata</i> by Hyndman &amp; Menzies (1990) requires confirmation, but they may represent this species. We exclude the record of <i>L</i>. cf. <i>nigropunctata</i> from the southern foothills of the Snow Mountains in Papua Province, Indonesia (Richards <i>et al.</i> 2015), pending genetic and acoustic analysis of that population. All records of this species are from foothill rainforest where males call from perches on low foliage adjacent to, or overhanging, small, shallow streams and seepages (Fig. 8). We have observed adult males in close proximity to eggs and embryos attached to leaves over such waterbodies on several occasions (Fig. 6E–F), including at the type locality on Iagifu Ridge. The only other pelodryadid frog observed at this location over many years (1999–2017) is a member of the <i>Litoria genimaculata</i> complex that deposits eggs directly into small streams, and we are confident that these ‘arboreal’ egg clutches belong to <i>L. gracilis</i> <b>sp. nov</b>. This conclusion is supported by the observation that the only known female of this species contains relatively large, yellow eggs typical of species that deposit their eggs on leaves above water (e.g., Menzies 1993). This reproductive strategy is an example of Mode 24 of Haddad &amp; Prado (2005), although the small clear streams into which the tadpoles drop could arguably be considered lotic rather than lentic habitats. <b>IUCN Red List status.</b> <i>Litoria gracilis</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> has a moderately broad distribution across more than 100 km of the southern foothills of Papua New Guinea’s Central Cordillera in an area where extensive tracts of primary forest remain and are likely to do so for the foreseeable future. We therefore recommend that it be assessed as Least Concern by the IUCN Red List. <b>Etymology.</b> Gracilis is a Latin adjective meaning slender, graceful, or gracile, and refers to the slender body form of this species. <b>Molecular divergences.</b> Based on analyses of a 787 base pair alignment from the mitochondrial <i>ND4</i> gene and flanking tRNA <i>L. gracilis</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> is the sister taxon to <i>L. daraiensis</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> (<i>dA</i> between the taxa of 0.08, Table 2). <i>dA</i> between sister species pairs in other groups of <i>Litoria</i> ranges from 0.04 to 0.25 (Donnellan <i>et al.</i> 2021, Rowley <i>et al.</i> 2021). Samples of <i>L. gracilis</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> from different localities show moderate intraspecific divergence (maximum p-distance 0.052). <i>Litoria gracilis</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> was formerly confounded with <i>L. nigropunctata</i> (e.g., Richards 2003) but it is deeply divergent from topotypic <i>L. nigropunctata</i> from Yapen Island (<i>dA</i> between the taxa of 0.15).
description: Published as part of <i>Richards, Stephen J., Donnellan, Stephen C. &amp; Oliver, Paul M., 2023, Five new species of the pelodryadid genus Litoria Tschudi from the southern versant of Papua New Guinea's Central Cordillera, with observations on the diversification of reproductive strategies in Melanesian treefrogs, pp. 151-190 in Zootaxa 5263 (2)</i> on pages 161-167, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/7800918
description: {"references": ["Menzies, J. I. (1972) Papuan tree frogs of the Litoria nigropunctata group. Herpetologica, 28, 291 - 300.", "Menzies, J. (2006) The frogs of New Guinea and the Solomon Islands. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia. [unknown pagination]", "Gunther, R. (2004) Two new treefrog species of the genus Litoria (Anura: Hylidae) from the west of New Guinea. Zoologische Abhandlungen. Staatliches Museum fur Tierkunde in Dresden, 54, 163 - 175.", "Hyndman, D. &amp; Menzies, J. (1990) Rain forests of the Ok Tedi headwaters, New Guinea: an ecological analysis. Journal of Biogeography, 17, 241 - 273. https: // doi. org / 10.2307 / 2845122", "Richards, S. J., Tjaturadi, B., Mumpuni &amp; Puradyatmika, P. (2015) Field guide to frogs of the Mimika region - Papua, Indonesia. PT Freeport Indonesia, Jakarta. [unknown pagination]", "Menzies, J. (1993) Systematics of Litoria iris (Anura, Hylidae) and its allies in New-Guinea and a note on sexual dimorphism in the group. Australian Journal of Zoology, 41, 225 - 255. https: // doi. org / 10.1071 / ZO 9930225", "Haddad, C. F. B. &amp; Prado, C. P. A. (2005) Reproductive Modes in Frogs and Their Unexpected Diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Bioscience, 55, 207 - 217. https: // doi. org / 10.1641 / 0006 - 3568 (2005) 055 [0207: RMIFAT] 2.0. CO; 2", "Donnellan, S. C., Catalano, S., Pederson, S., Mitchell, K., Suhendran, A., Price, L. C., Doughty, P. &amp; Richards, S. J. (2021) Revision of the Litoria watjulumensis (Anura: Pelodryadidae) group from the Australian monsoonal tropics, including the resurrection of L. spaldingi. Zootaxa, 4933 (2), 211 - 240. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4933.2.3", "Rowley, J., Mahony, M. J., Hines, H. B., Myers, S., Aplin, K. P., Price, L. &amp; Donnellan, S. C. (2021) Two new species from the Litoria rubella species group from eastern Australia. Zootaxa, 5071 (1), 1 - 41. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 5071.1.1"]}