Menüwahl in der Hochschulmensa : Fleisch oder Vegi? Ergebnisse eines 12-wöchigen Feldexperiments
Creators: name: Egeler, Gian-Andrea
name: Baur, Priska
Publisher: name: ZHAW Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften
Year: 2020
Subjects: Feldexperiment
Mensa
Gemeinschaftsgastronomie
Verpflegungstyp
Verpflegungsgewohnheit
Vegetarisch
Vegan
Fleischkonsum
Innovation
Ernährung
Flexitarier
Kassendaten
Reaktanz
Wahl Mittagessen
ABABAB-Umkehrdesign
Akzeptanz
Alter
Campuscard
Ernährungsgewohnheit
Frauen und Männer
Geld
Geschlecht
Hochschulcampus
Intervention
Mensagänger
Menülinie
Menüwahl
Mittagsverpflegung
Ovo-lakto-vegetarisch
Praxispartner
Reallabor
Student
Studentin
SV Schweiz
Mitarbeiter
Mitarbeiterin
Transdisziplinäre Forschung
Verpflegungsangebot
Flexitarisch
Kreativität
150: Psychologie
613.2: Diätetik

description: How do canteen visitors respond to a revised offer of meat-based and plant-based meals? Selected innovations were simultaneously implemented and tested in a trans­disciplinary field experiment in two university canteens over a 12-week period in the autumn semester 2017. Throughout this time, the meat dishes and ‘veg-meals’ (ovo-lacto-vegetarian and vegan meals) were randomly distributed among the three menu lines, the veg-meals were not marketed and advertised as such and the previous vegetarian menu line was abolished. Weeks where the usual number of meat dishes were on offer (the ‘base weeks’) alternated with weeks where the share of veg-meals was increased (the ‘intervention weeks’). 
The field experiment did not have a negative impact on the number of meals sold or the turnover compared to the two previous years. Women choose meat dishes less often than men. This connection applies in the base weeks and intervention weeks, in all age groups, among both students and among staff. Remarkably, the share of (non-labelled) vegan dishes is comparable for women and men over all age groups, independent of university affiliation (student, staff). Authentic vegan dishes were particularly welcome. Veg-meals could also be sold on the more expensive menu line. There was a better correlation between meal choice, eating habits and attitudes (health, environment, animal welfare, social aspects) than expected. 
One quarter of canteen visitors show ‘veg-oriented’ eating habits and three quarters thereof ‘meat-oriented’ eating habits. Only a minority of potential visitors eat regularly at the canteen, and those who do exhibit meat-oriented eating habits more often. We conclude, therefore, that the canteen’s usual menu offer is primarily aimed at visitors with meat-oriented eating habits at lunchtime. The most typical visitors to the canteen are male students who select meat dishes.
It has been shown, therefore, that the simultaneous changes in supply have worked. Veg-meals are preferred, particularly by women and those prone to flexitarian eating habits; however, also the canteen visitors with meat-oriented eating habits chose veg-meals during the intervention weeks. Catering in canteens has the great potential to expand the range of veg-meals at the expense of meat dishes, provided that the culinary quality is of a high enough standard and meals are not offered as vegetarian or vegan. The question arises as to whether canteens are not missing an economic opportunity if they only offer traditional meat dishes? Canteens are perfectly suited as real-world laboratories in which innovations for sustainable catering can be tried out. The field experiment in the two university canteens is a start; further experiments are needed.