Additional file 1 of The efficacy of gait rehabilitations for the treatment of incomplete spinal cord injury: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Creators: name: Patathong, Tanyaporn
name: Klaewkasikum, Krongkaew
name: Woratanarat, Patarawan
name: Rattanasiri, Sasivimol
name: Anothaisintawee, Thunyarat
name: Woratanarat, Thira
name: Thakkinstian, Ammarin
Publisher: name: figshare
Year: 2023
Subjects: subject: Medicine
subject: Neuroscience
subject: Biotechnology
subject: 69999 Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
subject: FOS: Biological sciences
subject: Science Policy

description: Additional file 1. Table S1. Search strategy in Medline via PubMed. Table S2. Search strategy in Scopus. Fig. S1. Funnel plots of (a) treadmill (TM) versus conventional physical therapy (CPT) (b) robotic assisted gait training (RAGT) versus conventional physical therapy and (c) contour funnel plot of plot robotic assisted gait training versus conventional physical therapy. Fig. S2. Funnel plots of (a) treadmill (TM) versus convention physical therapy (CPT) (b) robotic assisted gait training (RAGT) versus conventional physical therapy, and contour funnel plot of (c) treadmill versus convention physical therapy and (d) robotic assisted gait training versus conventional physical therapy for distance, Fig. S3. Funnel plots of Walking Index Spinal Cord injury (WISCI) outcome, (a) treadmill versus conventional physical therapy (b) robotic assisted gait training versus conventional physical therapy and contour funnel plot and (c) robotic assisted gait training versus conventional physical therapy. Fig. S4. Subgroup analysis of the time of injury between robotic assisted gait training versus conventional physical therapy on velocity of walking (m/s) in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury, Fig. S5. Subgroup analysis of time of training between robotic assist gait training versus conventional physical therapy on velocity of walking (m/s) in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. Fig. S6. Subgroup analysis of the level of spinal cord injury between robotic assisted gait training versus conventional physical therapy on velocity of walking (m/s) in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. Fig. S7. Subgroup analysis of time of injury between robotic assisted gait training versus conventional physical therapy on distance of walking (m) in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury.Fig. S8. Subgroup analysis of the level of spinal cord injury between robotic assisted gait training versus conventional physical therapy on distance of walking (m) in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. Fig. S9. Subgroup analysis of the level of spinal cord injury between robotic assisted gait training versus conventional physical therapy on Walking Index Spinal Cord injury (WISCI) outcome in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. Fig. S10. Predictive interval plots of mean difference for velocity (m/s) of 10 pairwise comparisons estimated; values in right column showed mean difference (95% confidence interval) (95% predictive interval). Fig. S11. Predictive interval plots of mean difference for distance (m) of 10 pairwise comparisons estimated; Values in right column showed mean difference (95% confidence interval) (95% predictive interval).