Tachycampoidea
Creators: name: Sendra, Alberto
name: Antić, Dragan
name: Barranco, Pablo
name: Borko, Špela
name: Christian, Erhard
name: Delić, Teo
name: Fadrique, Floren
name: Faille, Arnaud
name: Galli, Loris
name: Gasparo, Fulvio
name: Georgiev, Dilian
name: Giachino, Pier Mauro
name: Kovac, L'ubomír
name: Lukić, Marko
name: Marcia, Paolo
name: Miculinić, Kazimir
name: Nicolosi, Giuseppe
name: Palero, Ferran
name: Paragamian, Kaloust
name: Pérez, Toni
name: Polak, Slavko
name: Prieto, Carlos E.
name: Turbanov, Ilya
name: Vailati, Dante
name: Reboleira, Ana Sofia P. S.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2020
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Entognatha
Diplura
Campodeidae

description: Tachycampoid phyletic lineage
Other genera related to Plusiocampinae, the tachycampoid phyletic lineage
Bareth & Condé (1981) originally proposed a unique and different tachycampoid phylogenetic lineage (“lignée Tachycampoïde”) for a number of previously described genera: Tachycampa Silvestri, 1936 with one species from a cave in the western Rif Mountains (Silvestri 1936); Paratachycampa Wygodzinsky, 1944 with three species, one from a cave in Nuevo León (Mexico) and two from several caves in the eastern Iberian Peninsula (Wygodzinsky 1944; Bareth & Condé 1981); Juxtlacampa Wygodzinsky, 1944 with two species, one from a cave in Guerrero (Mexico) and another from a cave in Alta Verapaz (Guatemala) (Wygodzinsky 1944); and Jeannelicampa Condé, 1955 with one species from caves in Tell Atlas (Algeria) (Condé 1952, 1954c). Much later, Condé (1982) proposed a new genus within this phyletic lineage, Oncinocampa Condé, 1982, for a subterranean species from the north of the Iberian Peninsula and another one from Sardinia (Condé 1981b, 1982). A few years later, the diversity of Oncinocampa was increased with four more species, two from the same karst region in the Cantabric Mountain Range on the northern Iberian Peninsula (Sendra & Condé 1988, Bareth 1989) and two from caves in the Americas, one near São Paulo, Brazil (Condé 1997) and another in Veracruz, Mexico (Sendra et al., 2016). The number of species in Tachycampa has also been expanded with three new cave-dwelling species from Mexico (Sendra et al. 2016) (Fig. 209).
Diagnosis (Bareth & Condé 1981; Sendra et al. 2016)
Three main morphological features support the phyletic line of the tachycampoid group, although exceptions exist. First, the elbow-like claws with lateral crests (absent in Jeannelicampa stygia Condé, 1952). Second, the notal macrosetal formula: pronotum with 3+3 ma, la and lp; mesontum with 2+2 ma and la; metanotum with 1+1 ma or fewer (with only 1+1 lp pronotal macrosetae in Oncinocampa genuitei (Bareth, 1989); Paratachycampa hispanica Bareth & Condé, 1981 and P. penyoensis Bareth & Condé, 1981 have an extra lateral anterior macroseta). Finally, dorsal macrosetae are absent from the femur, with the exception of a small, thin macroseta in O. asonensis Sendra & Condé, 1988 and O. paclti Condé, 1981. Additionally, all species inhabit subterranean ecosystems, except O. paclti, which has non-troglomorphic features.
Taxonomic key to Euro-Mediterranean tachycampoid genera and species
1. 2+2 macrosetae on urosternite VIII................................................................................................2
– 1+1 macrosetae on urosternite VIII................................................................................................4
2. 9+9 macrosetae on urosternites II–VII .......... Paratachycampa penyoensis Bareth & Condé, 1981
– 6+6 or 7+7 macrosetae on urosternites II–VII................................................................................3
3. 6+6 macrosetae on urosternites II–VII ................................... Jeannelicampa stygia Condé, 1952
– 7+7 macrosetae on urosternites II–VII ......... Paratachycampa hispanica Bareth & Condé, 1981
4. Pretarsal claws without lateral crests ......................................... Jeannelicampa stygia Condé, 1952
– Pretarsal claws with lateral crests....................................................................................................5
5. Pretarsal claws with large lateral crests, but without backward overhang ...................................... .................................................................................................. Tachycampa lepineyi Silvestri, 1936
– Pretarsal claws with small lateral crests.........................................................................................6
6. Appendages of urosternite I in adult males piriform or subtrapezoidal..........................................7
– Appendages of urosternite I in adult males short, thick and large...................................................8
7. Appendages of urosternite I in adult males piriform ......................................................................... ............................................................................... Oncinocampa asonensis Sendra & Condé, 1988
– Appendages of urosternite I in adult males subtrapezoidal ..... Oncinocampa paclti (Condé, 1981)
8. 1+1 lateral anterior macrosetae or submacrosetae on pronotum, mesonotum and metanotum; 1+1 lateral anterior pronotal macrosetae or submacrosetae ............. Oncinocampa falcifer Condé, 1982
– Without notal macrosetae, except 1+1 long lateral posterior pronotal macrosetae ......................... .................................................................................................. Oncinocampa genuitei Bareth, 1989
description: Published as part of Sendra, Alberto, Antić, Dragan, Barranco, Pablo, Borko, Špela, Christian, Erhard, Delić, Teo, Fadrique, Floren, Faille, Arnaud, Galli, Loris, Gasparo, Fulvio, Georgiev, Dilian, Giachino, Pier Mauro, Kovac, L'ubomír, Lukić, Marko, Marcia, Paolo, Miculinić, Kazimir, Nicolosi, Giuseppe, Palero, Ferran, Paragamian, Kaloust, Pérez, Toni, Polak, Slavko, Prieto, Carlos E., Turbanov, Ilya, Vailati, Dante & Reboleira, Ana Sofia P. S., 2020, Flourishing in subterranean ecosystems: Euro-Mediterranean Plusiocampinae and tachycampoids (Diplura, Campodeidae), pp. 1-138 in European Journal of Taxonomy 591 on pages 109-110, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.591, http://zenodo.org/record/3659823