Left atrial strain predicts exercise capacity in heart failure independently of left ventricular ejection fraction
Creators: name: Maffeis, Caterina
name: Rossi, Andrea
name: Cannata, Lorenzo
name: Zocco, Camilla
name: Belyavskiy, Evgeny
name: Radhakrishnan, Aravind Kumar
name: Feuerstein, Anna
name: Morris, Daniel Armando
name: Pieske‐Kraigher, Elisabeth
name: Pieske, Burkert
name: Edelmann, Frank
name: Temporelli, Pier Luigi
Publisher: name: Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Year: 2022
Subjects: subject: Left atrial strain
subject: Cardiopulmonary exercise test
subject: Exercise capacity
subject: Heart failure
subject: Ejection fraction
subject: Prognosis
subject: 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit

description: Aims: We hypothesized that left atrial (LA) remodelling and function are associated with poor exercise capacity as prognostic marker in chronic heart failure (CHF) across a broad range of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods and results: One hundred seventy-one patients with CHF were analysed [age 65 +/- 11 years, 136 males (80%); 86 heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 27 heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), 58 heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)]. All patients underwent echocardiography and maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing and were classified according to a prognostic cut-off of peak VO2 (pVO(2); 14 mL/kg/min). Seventy-seven (45%) patients reached pVO(2) &lt; 14 and 94 (55%) pVO(2) &gt;= 14 mL/kg/min. Between the two groups, there was a considerable difference in both left atrial volume (LAVi, 53 +/- 24 vs. 44 +/- 18 mL/m(2), P = 0.005) and function (LA reservoir strain 12 +/- 5 vs. 20 +/- 10%, P &lt; 0.0001). Receiver-operating characteristic curves identified LA reservoir strain (area under the curve: 0.73 [0.65-0.80], P &lt; 0.0001) as strong predictor for impaired pVO(2) among all echocardiographic variables; LA reservoir strain &lt; 23% had 37% specificity but a very high sensitivity (96%) in identifying a severely reduced pVO(2). In logistic regression analysis, LA reservoir strain &lt; 23% was associated with a highly increased risk of pVO(2) &lt; 14 mL/kg/min (odds ratio 16.0 [4.7-54.6]; P &lt; 0.0001). The multivariate analysis showed that a reduced LA reservoir strain was associated with pVO(2) &lt; 14 mL/kg/min after adjustment for age, body mass index (BMI), and clinical variables, that is, New York Heart Association class, atrial fibrillation, haemoglobin, and creatinine (b 0.22 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.12-0.31]; P &lt; 0.0001), and after adjustment for echocardiographic variables, that is, LVEF or left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) (b 0.16 [95% CI 0.08-0.24]; P &lt; 0.0001). Patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF were separately analysed. Among LA reservoir strain, LAVi, LVEF, LVGLS, and TAPSE, LA reservoir strain was the only one significantly associated with pVO(2) in all subgroups (after adjustment for sex and BMI, P = 0.003, 0.04, and 0.01, respectively). Conclusions: In patients with CHF, an impaired LA reservoir function is independently associated with a severely reduced pVO(2). LA dysfunction represents a marker of poor prognosis across LVEF borders in the CHF population.