Momoria albohabena Domahovski 2020, sp. nov.
Creators: name: Domahovski, Alexandre Cruz
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2020
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hemiptera
Cicadellidae
Momoria
Momoria albohabena

description: Momoria albohabena sp. nov.   
(Figs 37 −56)  
 Diagnosis. Head (Fig. 39) with large rounded black macula over frons. Forewing (Figs 37, 38) with broad white transverse stripe at apex of clavus. Style (Figs 45, 46) with long dorsal process at mid-length, directed dorsally and curved ventrally; apical portion strongly curved inward. Aedeagus (Fig. 48), in posterior view, with apex bifid, forming pair of short, truncated lateral lobes.   
 Color. Head (Figs 37 −39) brown, face with large rounded black macula extending over frons and crown-face transition between ocelli. Pronotum (Fig. 37) brown or greenish-brown. Mesonotum (Fig. 38) yellow with lateral angles brown; scutellum yellow. Forewing (Figs 37, 38) translucent light-brown with broad white transverse stripe at apex of clavus; appendix and first apical cell with basal portion black. Legs (Fig 38) greenish-yellow with hind tibia with cucullate bases of macosetae black.   
 Measurements (mm). Holotype male: total length 3.6. Paratypes (male), 3.3−3.6; (female), 3.5−3.7.   
 Description. Body (Figs 37, 38) ovate, not depressed dorsoventrally. Head (Fig. 37), in dorsal view, very short, median length of crown one-tenth of interocular width; transocular width nine-tenths humeral width of pronotum; anterior and posterior margins parallel and broadly rounded; crown surface with transverse striae; ocelli not visible dorsally. Head (Fig. 38), in lateral view, with crown-face transition broadly rounded with transverse striae; frons slightly inflated; clypeus almost flat. Head (Fig. 39), in ventral view, with ocelli on anterior margin, mesad of anten- nal pits and distant from eyes; frons with transverse striae, lateral margins strongly convergent ventrally; frontogenal suture extending to antennal ledges; antennal ledge carinate and slightly oblique, not concealing antennal base; antenna length ca. one third width of head; gena broad, with small setae; ventrolateral margin broadly rounded, completely concealing proepisternum; maxillary plate produced ventrally as far as clypeus apex; epistomal suture complete; lorum with subgenal suture rounded, extended nearly to mid-length of lateral margin of frons; clypeus slightly longer than wide, lateral margins parallel, apex carinate and straight.   
Pronotum (Fig. 37), in dorsal view, with anterior margin broadly rounded, posterior margin slightly excavated; surface without setae, with transverse striae, except on anterior third; lateral margins convergent anterad, carinate, slightly shorter than eye length; in lateral view (Fig. 38) convex and declivous anterad. Exposed part of mesonotum and scutellum (Fig. 37), as long as pronotum length; surface with transverse striae; scutellum flat.  
Forewing (Figs 37, 38) with many small erect setae, venation obscure; clavus truncate apically; vein separating appendix and first apical cell evanescent apically, appendix and first apical cell membranous, glabrous; 3 closed anteapical cells and 4 apical cells (R1 vein absent).  
Profemur moderately elongated, 2.7 times longer than high; PD, AD and AM rows undifferentiated, with scattered setae, PD1 and AD1 setae short and AM1 absent; IC row formed by double row of fine setae, continuous with AV row; AV and PV rows formed by fine setae. Protibia, in cross-section, almost circular, with longitudinal carina adjacent to PD row; dorsal surface flattened; AV row formed by short, thin setae in the basal half and short, robust setae distally; AD row consisting of only undifferentiated setae; PD row with 3 long setae intercalated by undifferentiated setae; PV row with 3−4 long setae intercalated by undifferentiated setae. Hind leg with femoral setal formula 2:2:1; PD2 reduced in size; metatibia PD, AD and AV rows with 12−14, 9−10 and 9−10 macrosetae respectively; AD row without intercalary setae between macrosetae; PV row with setae of apical half intercalating 1 longer and thicker seta and 3−4 shorter and thinner setae, ending with 2 very short, thin setae; first tarsomere ventral surface with two longitudinal rows of simple (non-cucullate) setae; inner row formed by 4 short setae and external row with 5−6 longer setae; pecten with 4 platellae flanked by tapered lateral setae; second tarsomere pecten with 2 platellae flanked by tapered lateral setae.  
 Male terminalia. Sternite VIII (Fig. 40) convex, moderately produced posterad, 1.2 times wider than long, shorter than sternites VII and VI combined; ventral surface with many small setae; lateral angles rounded; posterior margin straight medially. Valve (Figs 41, 42) broadly fused laterally to pygofer; ventral margin excavated laterad of broad small median lobe. Pygofer (Figs 41, 42) with pair of hooks arising near base of plates, curved ventrally and acute apically; in lateral view (Fig. 41), higher on apical half; dorsal margin widely notched on basal twothirds; ventral margin broadly rounded, curved inwards at apical half; with longitudinal external carina near ventral margin of basal two-thirds; apex truncated, straight on dorsal portion and with short acute protrusion near ventral margin; macrosetae dispersed on apical fourth; in ventral view (Fig. 42), inner margin broadly rounded on apical two-third, with short setae on median third. Anal tube (Figs 41, 42) membranous, without processes. Subgenital plate (Figs 41−43) short, ovate in ventral view, not overlapping pygofer laterally, produced posterad as far as half length of pygofer; anterior portion elongated and curved dorsally; ventral surface without setae; dorsal surface with small dentiform process at half length of inner margin; apex rounded. Connective (Figs 44−46), small, U-shaped, with arms directed anterodorsally. Style (Figs 45, 46), thin and long, surpassing apex of subgenital plates; external margin with rounded lobe at point of articulation with connective; dorsal margin with long process at mid-length, directed dorsally and curved ventrally, apex acute, slightly curved outward; apical portion strongly curved inwards; apex acute. Aedeagus (Fig. 47), in lateral view, with preatrium developed, produced anterad; shaft strongly curved dorsally and tapered apically; ventral margin with subacute protrusion; in posterior view (Fig. 48), preatrium with divergent rami directed ventrally; shaft tapered toward apex; apex whit pair of apical processes, short and truncated; gonopore apical.   
 Female terminalia. Sternite VII (Fig. 49) ca. two times wider than long; ventral surface with short setae; posterior margin slightly excavated each side of short median rounded lobe. Internal sternite VIII membranous. Pygofer (Figs 49, 50) with short macrosetae, except on anterodorsal portion; ventral margin broadly rounded; apex truncated. Ovipositor (Fig. 50) slender, curved dorsad, not surpassing pygofer apex. First valvifer (Fig. 51) trapezoid, 1.3 times higher than long; anterior and dorsal approximately straight; posteroventral angle rounded. First valvula (Fig. 51) with dorsal and ventral margins, almost parallel, slightly convergent apically, ca. 9 times longer than high; ventral interlocking device long, extending over basal two-third; dorsal sculpturing area areolate on apical twothirds; apical portion (Fig. 52) with ventral sculpture present only near apex, continuous with the dorsal sculpture, apex tapered and acute. Second valvula (Fig. 53) ca. 16 times longer than high; dorsal and ventral margins parallel; dorsal margin with two subapical teeth widely spaced (second subapical tooth inconspicuous); apical portion (Fig. 54) with rounded denticles between second subapical tooth and apex, and scattered denticles anterior to second subapical tooth; apex rounded, with denticles on ventral margin. Second valvifer (Fig. 55) ca. 2.7 times higher than long. Gonoplac (Fig. 55) 5 times longer than high; dorsoapical margin long, almost parallel to ventral margin; ventral margin (Fig. 56) broadly rounded, with spaced macrosetae near ventral margin; apex rounded.   
 Etymology. The specific epithet, albohabena, is composed by the Latin words “ albo ˮ and “ habena ˮ which refers to the forewing with a transverse white stripe.   
 Material examined. Holotype male: “ Brasil, Paraná, S. [São] J. [José] dos\ Pinhais, 25º36’18”S \ 49º11’37”W 880m \ 03-17.XI.2018 Sweep\ A.C. Domahovski leg” (DZUP). Paratypes: 4♂, 2♀: same as holotype (DZUP); 1♂, 1♀: same data except 30.III.2016 (DZRJ); 1♀: same data except 10.I.2018 (MZSP); 3♂, 2♀: same data except 24.I.2018 (DZUP); 1♀: same data except 01-28.II.2018 (DZUP); 1♂: same data except 10-13.X.2018 (DZRJ); 3♂, 6♀: same data except 05-15.XII.2018 (DZUP); 1♂: same data except 11-28.IX.2019 (MZSP); 1♀: same data except 01-31.XII.2018 Malaise (DZUP); 1♂: “ Brasil, Paraná, Tibagi \ P. [Parque] E. [Estadual] do Guartelá, 1000m \ 24º33’47”S 50º15’26”W \ 23-24.II.2017 Luz \ A.C. Domahovski leg.” (DZUP); 1♂: “ Brasil, PR, S.J. dos Pinhais \ Rep. [Represa] Guaricana, Luz \ 25.7150ºS 48.9711ºW \ 750a 400m 12-14.XII.2017 \ Cavichioli & Domahovski ” (DZUP); 1♀: “ Brasil, PR, S.J. dos Pinhais \ Rep. Guaricana, Malaise,\ 25.7272ºS 48.9498ºW, 410m \ 23.XI- 12.XII.2017, Muniz, Melo,\ Cavichioli & Domahovski ” (DZUP); 2♂, 3♀: “ Brasil, Paraná, Piraquara, Ma-\ nanciais da Serra, 25º29’47”S \ 48º58’54”W 1021m, Sweep,\ 21-28.XI.2018, A.P. Pinto, B. R.\ Araujo & A.C. Domahovski ” (DZUP); 1♀: “ Brasil, Paraná, Piraquara,\ Mananciais da Serra, \ proximidades do Reservató-\ rio do Carvalho, 20.XI.2019 \ A.C. Domahovski leg.” (DZUP); 1♂: “ S. José Pinhais—PR\ Ser. [Serra do] Mar Br 277 Km 54 \ Brasil 24.XI.1986 \ Lev. [Levantamento] Ent. [Entomológico] Profaupar \ Malaise ” (DZUP); Minas Gerais: 3♂: “ Brasil, Minas Gerais,\ São Roque, P. [Parque] N. [Nacional] Serra \ da Canastra \ 14-19.xii.2013 Malaise \ Melo & Rosa legs.” (DZUP).   
 Notes. M. albohabena sp. nov. will key out at couplet 3 in Blocker’s (1979) key and resembles M. clarkei Blocker, 1979 from Colombia, in having the style with two long and curved processes. However, in M. clarkei the processes arise near the apex, before a curved and expanded portion of the apical fourth, while in the new species, the style in not expanded apically and the dorsal process arises at mid-length of style.
description: Published as part of Domahovski, Alexandre Cruz, 2020, New species of Bertawolia Blocker and Momoria Blocker (Cicadellidae: Iassinae Hyalojassini) from Brazil, including notes about host plants, pp. 475-490 in Zootaxa 4808 (3) on pages 484-488, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4808.3.4, http://zenodo.org/record/3933701