Laganosuchus thaumastos Sereno &amp; Larsson 2009, sp. n.
Creators: name: Sereno, Paul
name: Larsson, Hans
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2009
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Reptilia
Crocodylia
Stomatosuchidae
Laganosuchus

description: <i>Laganosuchus thaumastos</i> sp. n. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: B9B7ACB2-A32A-4190-810E-F93ADE61C245 Figs. 37 –41 Tables 12, 13 <b>Etymology.</b> <i>Thaumastos</i>, astonishing (Greek). Named for the remarkably slender depth of its lower jaws and its straight spike-shaped teeth. <b>Holotype.</b> MNN IGU13; nearly complete lower jaws missing only the left retroarticular process (Fig. 37). <b>Type locality.</b> Iguidi (west of In Abangharit), Agadez District, Niger Republic (N 17° 56’, E 5° 38’) (Fig. 1A). <b>Horizon.</b> Echkar Formation, Tegama Series; Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian), ca. 95 Mya (Taquet 1976). Found in association with the crocodyliform <i>Kaprosuchus saharicus</i>, abelisaurid <i>Rugops primus</i>, spinosaurid <i>Spinosaurus</i> sp., carcharodontosaurid <i>Carcharodontosaurus iguidensis</i>, an unnamed rebbachisaurid, and titanosaurian sauropods. <b>Diagnosis.</b> Metasuchian characterized by alveoli for dentary teeth 1–10 with a depressed labial rim that exposes the upper portion of the alveolus in labial view; slightly procumbent d1 and d2 teeth; two pairs of twinned dentary teeth with conjoined alveolar margins among postcaniniforms; and splenial anterior end split into a pair of short flanges. <b>Lower jaw.</b> The lower jaws of <i>Laganosuchus thauma</i> and <i>Stomatosuchus inermis</i> are remarkably slender and elongate and the symphysis extremely reduced compared to any extant crocodylian (Fig. 37). The lower jaws of <i>Laganosuchus</i> measure 0.84 m in length (Table 12) and probably pertain to a crocodyliform four-to-six meters in body length. Th e jaws of <i>Stomatosuchus</i> are 250% that of <i>Laganosuchus</i>, or approximately 2.1 m long. Th is is comparable to the length of the strongly built, robustly joined lower jaws in the largest individuals of <i>Sarcosuchus</i> (Sereno et al. 2001), the largest well documented crocodylomorph. <b>Table |2.</b> Dimensions (mm) of the lower jaw of <i>Laganosuchus thaumastos</i> (MNN IGU13). Measure- ments of paired structures taken from right side. Parentheses indicate estimated measurement. In dorsal view the mandible in <i>Laganosuchus</i> is U-shaped (Fig. 37A). Each side is gently bowed, with curvature toward the symphysis increasing at about the seventh alveolus. In lateral view the ventral margin of the lower jaw is also gently curved as in <i>Stomatosuchus</i> (Fig. 37B). The <i>dentary</i> is most slender in the region of alveolus five and six (Table 12). At the symphysis, the dentary joins its opposite, an articulation that appears to have been fused in the holotype. Th e broken ventral margin at the symphysis appears to have been thickened dorsoventrally, forming a low chin (Fig. 38D). The internal (labial) aspect of the dentary near the symphysis is convex with a discrete crest running along the dorsal edge of the splenial (Fig. 38B). At mid-length the dentary has an elliptical cross-section. Th e dorsal, festooned, alveolar margin is transversely broader than the ventral margin. In medial view, a very narrow neurovascular groove is exposed where the splenial has broken away (Fig. 38B). In lateral view the dentary splits into two posterior rami below alveoli 22 and 23. The dorsal ramus, which is the longer of the pair, twists onto the dorsal side of the coronoid process. Th ere it extends posteriorly as a tongue-shaped process that overlaps the surangular. Th is relation is unusual compared to extant crocodylians, as the surangular typically extends anteriorly, overlapping the dentary and approaching the posteriormost tooth. Th e subtriangular ventral ramus is short, the angular lapping it medially and extending anteriorly between the dentary and splenial. The <i>splenial</i> is a very thin sheet of bone that extends toward, but does not participate in, the symphysis (Fig. 38B). Th e distal end of the splenial is bifurcated, with Meckel’s canal terminating in the notch between the processes. In the anterior one-half of the dentary, Meckel’s canal is developed as a narrow incised groove lapped medially by the splenial (Fig. 38B). Externally, the symphyseal ramus of the dentary is marked by two rows of neurovascular foramina, one extending near the ventral margin in lateral view (Fig. 38A) and the other visible only in ventral view (Fig. 38D). The posterior end of the lower jaw is characterized by a rugose, low, and transversely broad coronoid process, below which is a strongly reduced, slit-shaped external mandibular fenestra (Figs. 39, 40). In medial view, the remarkably small adductor fossa is located immediately anterior to the glenoid. As seen on the left side (Fig. 40A), the articular surface of the glenoid is saddle-shaped, convex along an anterolateral-posteromedial axis and concave along an anteromedial-posterolateral axis (Fig. 40A). The right side is concave with irregular edges and shows signs of bone pathology. The retroarticular process, preserved only on the right side (Figs. 39B, 40B), has a triangular cross-section with sides that are concave. Th in posterior rami of the angular and prearticular completely overlap the articular on lateral and medial sides. The articular forms all of the dorsomedial face of the process, which is canted at an angle of approximately 45° (Fig. 40B). <b>Dentition.</b> There are 24 alveoli in each dentary with some variation in the position of two pairs of twinned alveoli. On both sides, the alveoli for tooth d6 and d7 are joined, the former is the smaller of the pair (Fig. 37A). A similar twinning, although less complete and involving alveoli of comparable size, occurs between alveoli of d16 and d17 on the left side and d17 and d18 on the right side. The alveolus for d1 is the largest in the tooth row and slightly larger than d4, commonly enlarged as a caniniform among crocodyliforms, and d2 (Table 13). The alveoli of d1 and d2 are canted labially and probably projected anterior to the rim of the opposing premaxilla. Th e alveolus for d3 is small (Fig. 38C). In lateral view, this alveolus is flanked mesially and distally by canted troughs that accommodated crowns of the opposing maxillary series (Fig. 38A). The dorsal margin between alveoli is developed as a ridge that becomes rounded posterior to d7. Festooning of the alveolar margin involves elevation of the rim of each alveolus with concave embayment of the lateral aspect of the interalveolar margin. Th e resulting undulating alveolar margin doubtless accommodated the interdigitation of opposing crowns. <b> Figure 4 |. Tooth of the crocodyliform <i>Laganosuchus thaumastos</i> gen. n. sp. n.</b> Medial view of the replacement crown in the eleventh alveolus of the right dentary (MNN IGU13). Scale bar equals 5 mm. Abbreviations: <i>ca</i>, carina; <i>d</i>, dentary; <i>sp</i>, splenial. Several broken crowns remain in place, their crown bases tightly fitted to their respective alveoli. In cross-section, these crowns are oval with a large central lumen. We exposed replacement teeth in several crypts (Fig. 41). Th e crowns are spikeshaped in lateral view, lacking recurvature or any apparent asymmetry. Th ey are oval in cross-section at their base, above which they become transversely compressed with sharp, unornamented mesial and distal carinae. Th ere is no ornamentation of the crown surface. The spike-shaped crowns remove any doubt that <i>Laganosuchus</i> was an active predator (Fig. 41). Because the spaced, oval alveoli resemble in size and shape those described in the anterior half of the maxilla of <i>Stomatosuchus</i>, it is possible that the latter genus had maxillary crowns of similar form (Stromer 1925). Th e alveolar margin of the dentary in <i>Stomatosuchus</i> was depicted as smooth, lacking large alveoli or a festooned margin (Fig. 2B, C), although Stromer (1925) questioned its state of preservation. Both genera would have fed on fish in a very different manner than extant crocodylians, given the mechanical limitations of such a slender, hoop-shaped mandible, unexpanded cross- section at the symphysis, posteriorly positioned coronoid process, and short span available between the coronoid process and supratemporal region for the adductor musculature. Bite forces would have been limited. Stomatosuchids may best be interpreted as sit-and-wait predators in shallow water, closing their interdigitating spike-shaped dentition on unsuspecting prey that wandered within the U-shaped perimeter of their long jaws.
description: Published as part of <i>Sereno, Paul &amp; Larsson, Hans, 2009, Cretaceous Crocodyliforms from the Sahara, pp. 1-143 in ZooKeys 28 (28)</i> on pages 78-84, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.28.325, http://zenodo.org/record/576570
description: {"references": ["Taquet P (1976) Geologie et paleontologie du gisement de Gadoufaoua (Aptian du Niger). Cahiers de Paleontologie 1976: 1 - 191.", "Sereno PC, Larsson HCE, Sidor CA, Gado B (2001) Th e giant crocodyliform Sarcosuchus from the Cretaceous of Africa. Science 294: 1516 - 1519.", "Stromer E (1925) Ergebnisse der Forschungsreisen Prof. E. Stromers in den Wusten Agyptens. II. Wirbeltier-Reste der Baharije-Stufe (unterstes Cenoman). 7. Stomatosuchus inermis Stromer, ein schwach bezahnter Krokodilier und 8. Ein Skelettrest des Pristiden Onchopristis numidus Huag sp. Abhandlungen der Koniglich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse 30: 1 - 22."]}