Dual-process model investigated in diabetes patient: A scoping review of its key concept, construct framework and application
Creators: name: Tianxue, Long
Publisher: name: Open Science Framework
Year: 2022
Subjects: subject: Medicine and Health Sciences
subject: Social and Behavioral Sciences

description: The current situation for diabetes patients maintaining a healthy lifestyle and therapy adherence is still unsatisfactory. Dual-process model, for it concerns both unconscious and conscious cognitive processes, may fit to explain various actions of diabetes patients better than traditional health-related theory only considering rational and deliberative cognitive process. While the theoretical basis and the practice of dual-process under the context of diabetes are still insufficient. We will conduct a scoping review including all designs of empirical studies related to diabetes and dual-process model, mapping the construct frameworks, scoping its application and finding the potential insufficiencies of the model research, and finally, we attempted to provide possible references for theoretical research and clinical practice in the future. This scoping review will be carried out following the guidance published by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) in December 2019(McGowan et al., 2020). A 5-step sequence framework will be applied(Arksey &amp; O'Malley, 2005). Eligibility criteria We considered a structured principle (PCC: Participants, Concept and Context) for eligibility criteria) as the eligible criteria. Participants:Any types of diabetes patients; Concept:The researches claimed to refer to dual-process model or any forms of dual-process model, including Reflective-Impulsive model, Analytic-Heuristic model, Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory, hot-cool system, Temporal Self-Regulation Theory. Besides, we also included the references not directly telling the name of the model but showing the cognitive representation of each process like implicit/explicit, conscious/unconscious and etc. When a new form of dual-process model appeared in screening, it would be discussed by research group to determine its inclusion; Context: No limitation. Either study in laboratory or in the field is accepted. Any review,guideline or book will be excluded and only the references published in English will be considered. The search will be conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and EBSCO (CINAHL; PsycInfo; PsycArticles; Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection) . We present the search strategy in PubMed as an example: 1. (((Diabetes Mellitus[MeSH Terms]) OR (diabetic[Title/Abstract])) OR (diabetes[Title/Abstract])) OR (Glucose Metabolism Disorders[MeSH Terms]) 2. ("reflective"[Title/Abstract] OR "explicit"[Title/Abstract] OR "conscious"[Title/Abstract] OR "inhibitory"[Title/Abstract] OR "reasoned"[Title/Abstract] OR "violitional"[Title/Abstract] OR "awareness"[Title/Abstract] OR "rational"[Title/Abstract] OR "deliberati*"[Title/Abstract] OR "regulatory"[Title/Abstract] OR "top-down"[Title/Abstract]) OR (analytic[Title/Abstract]) 3. ("reflective"[Title/Abstract] OR "explicit"[Title/Abstract] OR "conscious"[Title/Abstract] OR "inhibitory"[Title/Abstract] OR "reasoned"[Title/Abstract] OR "violitional"[Title/Abstract] OR "awareness"[Title/Abstract] OR "rational"[Title/Abstract] OR "deliberati*"[Title/Abstract] OR "regulatory"[Title/Abstract] OR "top-down"[Title/Abstract]) OR (analytic[Title/Abstract]) 4. (#2) AND (#3) 5. (((((("dual-process"[Title/Abstract]) ) OR ("dual systems"[Title/Abstract])) OR (Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory[Title/Abstract])) OR ("hot-cool system"[Title/Abstract])) OR ("choice architecture"[Title/Abstract])) OR (Temporal Self-Regulation Theory[Title/Abstract]) 7. (#1) AND (#6) References will be imported and duplicates were removed using EndNote 20. Then 2 reviewers will independently screen the records by title and abstract and followed the eligible criteria.In the next stage, both reviewers will read the full text of the selected reference to make the final decision. Any disagreement of each article will be discussed by both reviewers or consulted with the research group until reaching a consensus. Each included reference will be assigned for data charting using a self-designed Excel form by 3 reviewers according to the narrative descreptions. A 10% sample will undergo blinded parallel extraction for quality assessment and it was considered comparable.