Castleichthys auritus Smith 2004, n.sp.
Creators: name: Smith, David G.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2004
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Actinopterygii
Anguilliformes
Congridae
Castleichthys
Castleichthys auritus

description: <i>Castleichthys auritus</i> n.sp. Figs. 1–4 <b>Type material</b>. HOLOTYPE: CSIRO H.2083-05, female, 288 mm; Western Australia, northeast of Rowley Shoals, 16°53'S 120°21'E, depth 396 m, by prawn trawl, S. Morris (CSIRO), vessel “Striker”, 11 April 1989. <b>Description</b>. Measurements in mm, with proportions in parentheses: TL 288, preanal length 99 (34% TL), predorsal length 52.5 (18% TL), head length 34 (12% TL), depth at anus 15.5 (5.4% TL), snout length 7.9 (23% head), horizontal eye diameter 5.4 (16% head), snout to rictus 10.2 (30% head), gill opening 4.7 (14% head), interbranchial 9.1 (27% head), pectoral-fin length 16.0 (47% head). Meristic characters: preanal lateral-line (LL) pores 34, preoperculomandibular (POM) pores 8, infraorbital (IO) pores 5, supraorbital (SO) pores 2, supratemporal commissure (STC) pores 0. Predorsal vertebrae 15, preanal vertebrae 36, total vertebrae128. Body moderately elongate, more or less uniform in depth over most of its length, round in cross section anteriorly, becoming compressed posteriorly; tip of tail slender and flexible but not greatly attenuate or filiform; anus near anterior third of total length. Dorsal-fin origin slightly behind tip of appressed pectoral fin, continuous around tip of tail with anal fin, which begins immediately behind anus; fin rays segmented. Pectoral fin well developed, long, broad, conspicuously black. Gill opening relatively large, nearly vertical, upper end opposite middle of pectoral-fin base. Abdominal cavity ending shortly posterior to anus. Myorhabdoi absent (from radiograph). Head deepest at posterior end near gill opening, dorsal profile nearly flat from occiput to point slightly anterior to posterior nostril, then deflected ventrally to tip of snout. Mouth terminal, snout and lower jaw about equal, rictus below middle of eye. Eye well developed, relatively large. Anterior nostril tubular, at edge of lip; posterior nostril a simple round pore with a slightly raised rim, at mid-eye level, about 2–3 nostril diameters from anterior edge of eye. Upper lip with a free, upturned flange, beginning immediately behind first IO pore, which borders base of anterior nostril, and ending below anterior margin of eye. Lower lip with a downturned flange. Tongue free, long, and broad, when raised filling nearly entire roof of mouth medial to teeth. Skin of head smooth, without papillae or plicae. Lateral line complete, 34 pores before anus. Cephalic pores (Fig. 3) difficult to see, in part because of damage to head. Two SO pores visible, both relatively large: one on edge of upper lip before anterior nostril; one on side of head directly above anterior nostril; ethmoidal pore not apparent. IO canal with five pores: a conspicuous pore immediately adjacent to posterior edge of base of anterior nostril and immediately anterior to beginning of labial flange; a pore on side of jaw just above flange, about midway between anterior and posterior nostril; a pore on side of jaw just above flange, directly below posterior nostril; a pore on side of jaw at posterior end of flange, below anterior margin of eye; a pore behind rictus, under or slightly behind a vertical through posterior edge of eye; no pores behind eye. Eight pores visible in POM canal, five before rictus and three behind rictus. No STC pores visible. Teeth (Fig. 4) small, conical to peg-like in appearance. Intermaxillary region damaged, number and placement of teeth somewhat uncertain; teeth conical, appear to be arranged in two transverse rows. Vomerine teeth smaller, conical, in a slightly elongate patch. Maxillary teeth peglike in appearance, with bevelled edges, uniserial but not closely appressed or forming a cutting edge. Mandibular teeth conical anteriorly, peg-like laterally, mostly uniserial but biserial at anterior end of jaw. <b>Preserved coloration</b>. Light gray-brown, paler ventrally. Dorsal and anal fins with body colour anteriorly, becoming dark toward posterior part of tail, progressively darker posteriorly, becoming black at tip of tail. Pectoral fins conspicuously black. Gill opening, inside of mouth, and peritoneum pale. <b>Remarks</b>. The anterior end of the snout and lower jaw have been crushed and slightly caved in, pushing the tip slightly to the left. The main damage on the snout was to the tip of the intermaxillary plate and the teeth that it bears. The lower jaw has been broken at the tip. For that reason, the precise number and arrangement of teeth at the anterior end of both jaws are somewhat uncertain. The specimen is a female with enlarged gonads; the eggs are contained within the ovary. <b>Etymology</b>. Latin <i>auritus</i>, eared; in reference to the large, conspicuous pectoral fins, which resemble the ears of a rabbit or a mule. An adjective. <b>Distribution</b>. The only known specimen was collected on the continental slope off the northwestern coast of Australia, at a depth of 396 m. <b>Comparisons and relationships</b>. The relatively short preanal length (less than 40% TL), slender and flexible tail, segmented dorsal- and anal-fin rays, and lack of myorhabdoi place this species within the subfamily Congrinae, as defined by Asano (1962) and Smith (1989). Superficially, it somewhat resembles members of <i>Macrocephenchelys</i> Fowler, 1934, especially in the relatively short snout and long postorbital region, and the large pectoral fins. The species of <i>Macrocephenchelys</i>, however, have no upper labial flange, and the lips are strongly plicate; in addition, they have multiserial teeth. The presence of a labial flange distinguishes the new species from most genera of Congrinae, except for <i>Congriscus</i> Jordan &amp; Hubbs, 1925, <i>Conger</i> Bosc, 1817, <i>Gnathophis</i> Kaup, 1860, <i>Rhynchoconger</i> Jordan &amp; Hubbs, 1925, and <i>Blachea</i> Karrer &amp; Smith, 1980. <i>Congriscus</i> and <i>Gnathophis</i> have blunt, stiffened tail tips, quite unlike the slender tail in the new species. In <i>Conger</i>, the pectoral fin is smaller, usually 25–35% of head length, and not conspicuously black; the maxillary teeth are closely appressed and form a cutting edge; an adnasal pore (at the end of a short branch ascending dorsally from the anterior end of the IO canal) and at least one STC pore are present; the labial flange is more extensive, reaching nearly to the rictus; and the tongue is smaller. In <i>Rhynchoconger</i>, the flange is greatly reduced, often to a near vestige; the snout conspicuously overhangs the lower jaw, leaving the intermaxillary tooth patch exposed when the mouth is closed; the tail is greatly attenuate; and the teeth are in granular patches. <i>Blachea</i> has the snout distinctly overhanging the lower jaw, the tips of the branchiostegals protruding freely through the gill opening, and the lateral line enlarged and opening through a double series of pores. If the new species is run through the key to genera of Congridae in the western central Pacific (Smith, 1999: 1682), it comes out closest to <i>Conger</i>, in couplet 13a. Although the maxillary and mandibular teeth are in one row (like <i>Conger</i>) rather than in bands, they do not form a cutting edge as they do in <i>Conger</i>. The specimen further differs from <i>Conger</i> in the characters mentioned in the previous paragraph, and its overall appearance is quite different. Based on the characters available for study, the new species does not fit into any of the existing congrid genera. With only a single specimen available, osteological characters (besides those visible on the radiograph) could not be investigated. Further studies on the relationships of this species must await the capture of additional specimens. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. My late friend and colleague, P.H.J. Castle of Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand, informed me of this specimen and had it transferred to me when he was unable to continue his work. A. Graham, collection manager at CSIRO, Hobart, sent me the specimen on loan.
description: Published as part of <i>Smith, David G., 2004, A New Genus and Species of Congrid Eel (Teleostei: Anguilliformes: Congridae) from Western Australia, pp. 143-146 in Records of the Australian Museum 56 (2)</i> on pages 144-146
description: {"references": ["Asano, H., 1962. Study on the congrid eels of Japan. Misaki Marine Biological Laboratory Bulletin 1: 1 - 143.", "Smith, D. G., 1989. Family Congridae. In Fishes of the Western North Atlantic, ed. E. B. Bohlke, pp. 460 - 567. Sears Foundation for Marine Research, memoir 1, part 9, vol. 1, Anguilliformes and Saccopharyngiformes, pp. xvii + 655.", "Fowler, H. W., 1934. Descriptions of new fishes obtained 1907 to 1910, chiefly in the Philippine Islands and adjacent seas. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 85 (for 1933): 233 - 367.", "Bosc, L. A. G., 1816 - 1819. [Pisces accounts.] In Nouveau Dictionnaire d'Histoire Naturelle, Nouv. Ed. Paris, vols: 1 - 36. [Vol. 18 (1817)].", "Kaup, J. J., 1860. Neue aalaehnliche Fische des Hamburger Museums. Abhandlungen aus dem Gebiete der Naturwissenschaften Heransgegeben von dem Naturwissenschaftlichen Verein in Hamburg 4 (2): 1 - 29 + 4 pp.", "Smith, D. G., 1999. Congridae - conger eels. In FAO Species Identification Guide for Fishery Purposes. The Living Marine Resources of the Western Central Pacific. Vol. 3. Batoid Fishes, Chimaeras and Bony fishes, part 1 (Elopidae to Linophrynidae), ed. K. E. Carpenter and V. H. Niem, pp. 1680 - 1687."]}