cometadata/datacite-rtg-text-other-reclassification-records huggingface dataset:
Notosinister millepunctatus Kosuge 1962
Creators: name: Bakker, Piet A. J.
name: Albano, Paolo G.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Mollusca
Gastropoda
Triphoridae
Notosinister
Notosinister millepunctatus

description: Notosinister millepunctatus Kosuge, 1962
Notosinister millepunctatus Kosuge, 1962b: 83, pl. 10, fig. 4, textfig. 12, 17.
Triphora millepunctata (Kosuge, 1962) — Kuroda et al. 1971: 268, pl. 113, fig. 13.
Mesophora millepunctatus (Kosuge, 1962) — Chang & Wu 2005: 36, fig. 77.
Mastonia millepunctata (Kosuge, 1962) — Okutani 2000: 309, pl. 153, fig. 45.
Type locality. Japan, Ankyaba, Setouchi –machi, Amami Islands.
Type material. NSMT-Mo 13038, holotype. NHMUK 1966144, paratype.
Distribution. Australia (Stephens 2017), China Sea (Zongguo & Mao 2012), Hawaii (Severns 2011), Japan (Kosuge 1962b; Kosuge 1963a; Kuroda et al. 1971; Higo et al. 1999; Okutani 2000; Higo et al. 2001; Chang & Wu 2005; Kill et al. 2013; Okutani 2017; Lee et al. 2018; Albano et al. 2019), Korea (Min et al. 2004; Lee et al. 2018), Philippines (Poppe 2008; Kill et al. 2013; Lee et al. 2018), South Korea (Kill et al. 2013), Taiwan (Chang & Wu 2005; Chang 2006e), Thailand (Gemert 2003; Wells et al. 2021).
description: Published as part of Bakker, Piet A. J. & Albano, Paolo G., 2022, Nomenclator, geographic and stratigraphic distribution of the family Triphoridae (Mollusca: Gastropoda), pp. 1-216 in Zootaxa 5088 (1) on page 116, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5088.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5836536
Winnertzia bulbifera Mamaev 1963
Creators: name: Jaschhof, Mathias
name: Jaschhof, Catrin
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2020
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Diptera
Cecidomyiidae
Winnertzia
Winnertzia bulbifera

description: Winnertzia bulbifera Mamaev agg.
Figs 63–65
Our reexamination revealed that W. bulbifera sensu Jaschhof & Jaschhof (2013) comprises three discrete species, referred to here as A, B and C. The genitalic illustration in Mamaev’s original description (Mamaev 1963: fig. 3.5) suggests that the genuine W. bulbifera is identical with our species A (Fig. 63), an assumption that must be corroborated in the future by study of the holotype.
Within the solidaginis group, W. bulbifera agg. is distinguished by the conspicuously long gonostylus with inflated apex, whose exact outline is specific to each of A, B and C (Figs 63–65). Also, in species C the fore tibia is markedly longer than the second tarsomere, while in A and B both segments are maximally equally long (occasionally the tibia is even slightly shorter than the second tarsomere). Specimens at our disposal, altogether 19 males, indicate that the habitats of A, B and C differ also. Specimens of A (n = 7) come from moist forests of spruce and pine; specimens of B (n = 7) from swamp forests of spruce interspersed with small-leaved softwoods, such as alder, birch and willow; and specimens of C (n = 5) from dry pine forests. To solve this taxonomic issue, the preliminary observations described here must be supported by better data, both from morphological study of extra-Swedish specimens and DNA barcoding.
Winnertzia ombergensis, a new species described below, resembles W. bulbifera agg. in the long, apically inflated gonostylus as well as in the medial gonocoxal bridges, which are strongly bulging. We think that all these species belong to a monophyletic subgroup (bulbifera subgroup) of the solidaginis group. Winnertzia fraxinophila is another new species with long, inflated gonostylus, although we deem it closer to W. solidaginis, for both these species have gonocoxae in which the dorsoposterior portions, not the medial bridges, are protruding. Finally, W. obscurella Mamaev is another species described as having the gonostylus both long and inflated (Mamaev 2002a: fig. 3), but in other respects the species description is too imprecise for drawing conclusions regarding the intrageneric placement of this species.
Material studied. Species A: spns GULI 000021220 and GULI 000021226 in NHRS, spns SE1646–SE1648 and CEC 2868– CEC 2869 in SDEI. Species B: spns GULI 000021222– GULI 000021225 in NHRS, spns CEC 2873 and CEC 3213– CEC 3214 in SDEI. Species C: spn GULI 000021221 in NHRS, spns CEC 2870– CEC 2872 and CEC 2874 in SDEI.
description: Published as part of Jaschhof, Mathias & Jaschhof, Catrin, 2020, Reevaluation of species richness in Winnertzia (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae, Winnertziinae), with descriptions of 37 new species from Sweden, Peru and Australia, pp. 1-72 in Zootaxa 4829 (1) on page 34, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4829.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4402757
Strigamia bicolor Shinohara 1981
Creators: name: Bonato, Lucio
name: Dányi, László
name: Socci, Antonio Augusto
name: Minelli, Alessandro
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2012
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Chilopoda
Geophilomorpha
Linotaeniidae
Strigamia
Strigamia bicolor

description: Strigamia bicolor Shinohara, 1981
References for morphology: Shinohara 1981a.
Taxonomic notes. Described originally as a species of Strigamia, it was cited rarely in the literature, but its validity was never questioned.
Distribution: Korean peninsula, Honshu and Taiwan.
description: Published as part of Bonato, Lucio, Dányi, László, Socci, Antonio Augusto & Minelli, Alessandro, 2012, Species diversity of Strigamia Gray, 1843 (Chilopoda: Linotaeniidae): a preliminary synthesis, pp. 1-39 in Zootaxa 3593 on page 10, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.214898
Subulophora minima Laseron 1958
Creators: name: Bakker, Piet A. J.
name: Albano, Paolo G.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Mollusca
Gastropoda
Triphoridae
Subulophora
Subulophora minima

description: Subulophora minima Laseron, 1958
Subulophora minima Laseron, 1958: 612, fig. 130–131.
Type locality. Australia, Darwin.
Type material. AMS C.103067, holotype. AMS C.64418, paratypes.
Distribution. Australia (Laseron 1958).
description: Published as part of Bakker, Piet A. J. & Albano, Paolo G., 2022, Nomenclator, geographic and stratigraphic distribution of the family Triphoridae (Mollusca: Gastropoda), pp. 1-216 in Zootaxa 5088 (1) on page 116, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5088.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5836536
Strigamia bidens Wood 1862
Creators: name: Bonato, Lucio
name: Dányi, László
name: Socci, Antonio Augusto
name: Minelli, Alessandro
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2012
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Chilopoda
Geophilomorpha
Linotaeniidae
Strigamia
Strigamia bidens

description: Strigamia bidens Wood, 1862
Synonym: Scolioplanes ruber Bollman, 1887.
References for morphology: Meinert 1886 (sub Scolioplanes parviceps); Bollman 1887 (sub Scolioplanes ruber); Brölemann 1896; Chamberlin 1912a; Crabill 1954b.
Taxonomic notes. Described originally as a species of Strigamia, it was subsequently assigned variously to Linotaenia, Scolioplanes or Tomotaenia. The species was recorded repeatedly by many authors. Meinert’s (1886) concept for S. bidens is unclear: a specimen reliably identified by others as S. bidens (as confirmed by Cook (1896) as well as by Meinert’s description), and also (erroneously) considered by Meinert as belonging to Wood’s type material, was tentatively referred by him to S. parviceps Wood; moreover, based on unpublished evidence, Cook (1896) suspected that Meinert intended to introduce S. parviceps as a new species name.
Scolioplanes ruber was described by Bollman (1887) and recorded other times by the same author. It was synonymized under S. bidens by Chamberlin (1912a), but Attems (1929) listed it as a distinct species. The synonymy is confirmed here, because the original description of S. ruber is fully congruent with S. bidens, also in some major diagnostic features of the latter species, including number of legs, ultimate leg-bearing segment with narrow metasternite, and scattered coxal pores.
Distribution: south-eastern part of North America, northwards to Illinois, Indiana, Ohio and Pennsylvania, southwards to Louisiana, Mississippi and Georgia, westwards to Missouri.
description: Published as part of Bonato, Lucio, Dányi, László, Socci, Antonio Augusto & Minelli, Alessandro, 2012, Species diversity of Strigamia Gray, 1843 (Chilopoda: Linotaeniidae): a preliminary synthesis, pp. 1-39 in Zootaxa 3593 on page 10, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.214898
Strigamia bothriopus Wood 1862
Creators: name: Bonato, Lucio
name: Dányi, László
name: Socci, Antonio Augusto
name: Minelli, Alessandro
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2012
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Chilopoda
Geophilomorpha
Linotaeniidae
Strigamia
Strigamia bothriopus

description: Strigamia bothriopus Wood, 1862
Synonym: Scolioplanes robustus Meinert, 1886.
References for morphology: Meinert 1886 (sub Scolioplanes robustus, not Scolioplanes bothriopus); Chamberlin 1912a (sub Linotaenia fulva); Crabill 1954b.
Taxonomic notes. Described originally as a species of Strigamia, it was assigned variously to Linotaenia, Scolioplanes or Tomotaenia. It was definitely assigned to Strigamia by Crabill (1954b), who however emendated the name incorrectly as “ Strigamia bothriopa ”. Wood (1862, 1865) suspected that it could be identical to Geophilus rubens Say (see below, under “Excluded species”). Following Meinert (1886), who suspected that it could be identical with S. fulva, many authors synonymised S. bothriopus under S. fulva (Bollman 1888a, 1893c; Chamberlin 1909, 1912a; Williams & Hefner 1928; Attems 1929; Johnson 1952), until Crabill (1954b) recognized that the two species are actually distinct.
Scolioplanes robustus was described originally by Meinert (1886) and maintained as a valid species for long time, also by Attems (1929). However, after the re-examination of the holotype, S. robustus was synonymized under S. fulva by Chamberlin (1912a), but under an erroneous concept of the latter that actually corresponds to S. bothriopus (see above); only Crabill (1954b) recognized S. robustus as probably identical to S. bothriopus.
Distribution: eastern part of North America, northwards to Wisconsin, New York State and Massachusetts, southwards to Georgia, westwards at least to Missouri and Arkansas. More western records need confirmation because of past confusion with other species, including S. fulva.
description: Published as part of Bonato, Lucio, Dányi, László, Socci, Antonio Augusto & Minelli, Alessandro, 2012, Species diversity of Strigamia Gray, 1843 (Chilopoda: Linotaeniidae): a preliminary synthesis, pp. 1-39 in Zootaxa 3593 on page 10, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.214898
Triphoris minima Pease 1871
Creators: name: Bakker, Piet A. J.
name: Albano, Paolo G.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Mollusca
Gastropoda
Triphoridae
Triphoris
Triphoris minima

description: Triphoris minima Pease, 1871
Triphoris minimus Pease, 1871: 774.
Triforis minimus Pease, 1871 — Tryon 1887: 191.
Cautor minima (Pease, 1871) — Kay 1979: 137, fig. 49h.
Original localities. Hawaii, Howland Island and Kauai Island.
Type material. MCZ 50071, lectotype. MCZ 50070 and MCZ 298495, paralectotypes.
Distribution. Hawaii (Pease 1871; Tryon 1887; Paetel 1888; Kay 1979; Johnson 1994; Hemmes et al. 1996b; Severns 2011).
Remarks. The genus Triphoris is of feminine gender, therefore the name should be Triphoris minima. Lectotype designation by Johnson (1994).
description: Published as part of Bakker, Piet A. J. & Albano, Paolo G., 2022, Nomenclator, geographic and stratigraphic distribution of the family Triphoridae (Mollusca: Gastropoda), pp. 1-216 in Zootaxa 5088 (1) on page 116, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5088.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5836536
Strigamia branneri Bollman 1888
Creators: name: Bonato, Lucio
name: Dányi, László
name: Socci, Antonio Augusto
name: Minelli, Alessandro
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2012
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Chilopoda
Geophilomorpha
Linotaeniidae
Strigamia
Strigamia branneri

description: Strigamia branneri (Bollman, 1888) *
References for morphology: Bollman 1888b; Chamberlin 1912a.
Taxonomic notes. Described originally as a species of Linotaenia, it was assigned subsequently to Scolioplanes or Tomotaenia, until it was included in Strigamia by Crabill (1955). Its validity was never questioned. However, S. branneri could turn out to be a junior synonym of S. chionophila, because no character is known for distinguishing effectively the two species. Putative differential characters given by Chamberlin (1912a), i.e. the shape of the posterior margin of the head and the elongation of the forcipular metatergite, are actually variable between conspecific specimens of Strigamia (our obs.); moreover, Chamberlin (1961) himself synonymized L. miuropus under S. chionophila (see below, under S. chionophila) despite the fact that the type specimen of the former agrees with S. branneri in the shape of the posterior margin of the head.
Distribution: eastern part of North America, northwards at least to Illinois, possibly to Michigan and New York State, southwards to Georgia, westwards to Missouri and Arkansas.
description: Published as part of Bonato, Lucio, Dányi, László, Socci, Antonio Augusto & Minelli, Alessandro, 2012, Species diversity of Strigamia Gray, 1843 (Chilopoda: Linotaeniidae): a preliminary synthesis, pp. 1-39 in Zootaxa 3593 on page 11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.214898
Cerithium (Ino) minimum Hutton 1873
Creators: name: Bakker, Piet A. J.
name: Albano, Paolo G.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Mollusca
Gastropoda
Cerithiidae
Cerithium
Cerithium minimum

description: Cerithium (Ino) minimum Hutton, 1873 [invalid; primary homonymy]
Cerithium (Ino) minimum Hutton, 1873: 27.
Type locality. New Zealand.
Type material. NMNZ M.000140, syntype.
Remarks. Cerithium minimum Hutton, 1873 is a preoccupied name, therefore Suter (1908) introduced a replacement name Triphora huttoni.
description: Published as part of Bakker, Piet A. J. & Albano, Paolo G., 2022, Nomenclator, geographic and stratigraphic distribution of the family Triphoridae (Mollusca: Gastropoda), pp. 1-216 in Zootaxa 5088 (1) on page 116, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5088.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5836536
Hyptia deansi Jennings, Krogmann and Mew, sp. nov.
Creators: name: Jennings, John T.
name: Krogmann, Lars
name: Mew, Steven L.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2012
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hymenoptera
Evaniidae
Hyptia
Hyptia deansi

description: Hyptia deansi, Jennings, Krogmann and Mew, sp. nov.
Figures 1–4.
Holotype: Specimen in amber from Simojovel, Chiapas, Mexico. Lower Miocene to Upper Oligocene. State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart SMNS MX –440.
Etymology. The species epithet is named in honour of Andy Deans, North Carolina State University, who has done much to revive interest in the Evaniidae.
Diagnosis. Female fully winged and of small body size (total length 5.55 mm); body brown except for black metasoma, petiole black in first quarter, apical margins of flagellomeres 1–10 black, giving antenna a banded appearance. Head 0.80 mm, mesosoma 2.50 mm, metasoma 2.61 mm; head 1.60 × as wide as long; vertex 0.15 × head width; compound eye half as long as head, distance between eyes 0.77 mm; distance of lateral ocellus to compound eye 0.17 mm; occipital carina broad, complete; malar space 0.83 × height of compound eye; face and clypeus punctate, frons and vertex rugose-punctate; clypeus not swollen medially; antennae inserted at mid-line of eye, toruli almost touching; distance from torulus to eye 0.37 mm; antennae with 11 flagellomeres; scape 0.69 mm in length; pedicel slightly longer than wide, 0.17 mm in length, first flagellomere 0.14 mm in length; flagellomeres slightly longer than wide, except apical flagellomere 0.35 × as long as wide. mesoscutellum and scutellum punctate; notauli percurrent, each notaulus indicated by a row of punctures in slight depression; propodeum areolate; petiole long and thin, 0.73 × length of the remaining metasoma (i.e. the gaster); gaster elliptical. Fore wing venation reduced, only C and Sc+R present. Hind wing obscured basally, only vein C apparent, with four distal hamuli. Legs elongate; fore coxae about 2 × distance between mid and hind coxae, pretarsal claws short, slender, simple, arolium present. Ovipositor short, straight, 0.21 × length of metasoma.
description: Published as part of Jennings, John T., Krogmann, Lars & Mew, Steven L., 2012, Hyptia deansi sp. nov., the first record of Evaniidae (Hymenoptera) from Mexican amber, pp. 63-68 in Zootaxa 3349 on page 65, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.209005
Triforis minuata Deshayes 1866
Creators: name: Bakker, Piet A. J.
name: Albano, Paolo G.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Mollusca
Gastropoda
Triphoridae
Triforis
Triforis minuata

description: † Triforis minuata Deshayes, 1866
Triforis minuatus Deshayes, 1866: 240, pl. 81, fig. 40–43.
Triforis minutus Deshayes, 1866 [sic]— Cossmann 1889: 52.
Triforis (Epetrium) minuata Deshayes — Harris & Burrows 1891: 89.
Triphora minuta Deshayes, 1866 [sic]— Gougerot & Le Renard 1981: 54, fig. 11, 28.
Type locality. France, Grignon, Parnes, Chaussy, Paris Basin.
Type stratum. Middle Eocene, Lutetian.
Type material. Type material in UCBL (pers. com. J.-M. Pacaud with PGA, 11 April 2020).
Distribution. France (Deshayes 1866; Cossmann 1889; Harris & Burrows 1891; Gougerot & Le Renard 1981).
Geological age. Eocene (Cossmann 1889; Harris & Burrows 1891; Gougerot & Le Renard 1981).
Remarks. The genus Triforis is of feminine gender, therefore the name should be Triforis minuata.
description: Published as part of Bakker, Piet A. J. & Albano, Paolo G., 2022, Nomenclator, geographic and stratigraphic distribution of the family Triphoridae (Mollusca: Gastropoda), pp. 1-216 in Zootaxa 5088 (1) on page 117, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5088.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5836536
iMagine: A Cutting-Edge AI-Platform for Aquatic Sciences
Creators: name: Alibabaei, Khadijeh
name: Sipos, Gergely
name: Schaap, Dick
name: López-García, A.
name: Kozlov, V.
Publisher: name: Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)
Year: 2024

description: Image analysis in aquatic science deals with large amounts of unlabeled data and a high diversity of data types. The data is rapidly increasing and is captured in changing environments. To advance image analytics and increase research performance, a dedicated iMagine AI framework and platform is established, operated, and validated. The platform is connected to EOSC and AI4EU, giving researchers in aquatic sciences open access to a diverse portfolio of AI-based image analysis services and image repositories from multiple RIs, working on and of relevance to the overarching theme of ‘Healthy oceans, seas, coastal and inland waters’.
Strigamia carmela Chamberlin 1941
Creators: name: Bonato, Lucio
name: Dányi, László
name: Socci, Antonio Augusto
name: Minelli, Alessandro
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2012
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Chilopoda
Geophilomorpha
Linotaeniidae
Strigamia
Strigamia carmela

description: Strigamia carmela (Chamberlin, 1941)
References for morphology: Chamberlin 1941.
Taxonomic notes. Described originally as a species of Korynia, it was almost neglected, but its validity was never questioned. It is assigned here to Strigamia for the first time (new combination), because it shares all major diagnostic features of Strigamia (see above under “Notes on synonymies”).
Distribution: known from a single locality in the Coast Ranges, California.
description: Published as part of Bonato, Lucio, Dányi, László, Socci, Antonio Augusto & Minelli, Alessandro, 2012, Species diversity of Strigamia Gray, 1843 (Chilopoda: Linotaeniidae): a preliminary synthesis, pp. 1-39 in Zootaxa 3593 on page 11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.214898
Assessing the Relationship Between Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Patterns and Oral health Outcomes in Paediatric Patients: A Scoping Review
Creators: name: Jasleen Nagra
name: , Tala
name: Lee, Jin
name: Hassoun, Mariam
name: Pearson, Lottie
name: Ayat Hafouda
name: Horton, Holly
Publisher: name: OSF Registries
Year: 2024
Subjects: subject: Dental Public Health and Education
subject: Medicine and Health Sciences
subject: Dentistry
subject: FOS: Clinical medicine
subject: Caries
subject: Decay
subject: Dental
subject: Health
subject: Sugar

description: Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to understand the effects of fruit and vegetable consumption in relation to oral health within paediatric patients

Introduction: The rational for conducting this scoping review is to understand how fruit and vegetables can specifically affect oral health. This is because here is a heavy push within the world which encourages young people to eat a range of different fruits and vegetables due to its general health benefits.
Nanaphora minuta Laseron 1958
Creators: name: Bakker, Piet A. J.
name: Albano, Paolo G.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Mollusca
Gastropoda
Triphoridae
Nanaphora
Nanaphora minuta

description: Nanaphora minuta Laseron, 1958
Nanaphora minuta Laseron, 1958: 640, fig. 237–238.
Type locality. Australia, Christmas Island.
Type material. AMS C.103141, holotype.
Distribution. Australia, Christmas Island (Laseron 1958).
description: Published as part of Bakker, Piet A. J. & Albano, Paolo G., 2022, Nomenclator, geographic and stratigraphic distribution of the family Triphoridae (Mollusca: Gastropoda), pp. 1-216 in Zootaxa 5088 (1) on page 117, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5088.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5836536
Strigamia caucasia Verhoeff 1938
Creators: name: Bonato, Lucio
name: Dányi, László
name: Socci, Antonio Augusto
name: Minelli, Alessandro
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2012
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Chilopoda
Geophilomorpha
Linotaeniidae
Strigamia
Strigamia caucasia

description: Strigamia caucasia (Verhoeff, 1938)
References for morphology: Verhoeff 1938b; Dobroruka 1977.
Taxonomic notes. Described originally as a species of Scolioplanes (Protoplanes), it was assigned to Strigamia by Dobroruka (1977), though misspelled as “ Strigamia caucasica ”. It was almost ignored in the literature, but its validity was never questioned.
Distribution: known from a single locality in the western Caucasus.
description: Published as part of Bonato, Lucio, Dányi, László, Socci, Antonio Augusto & Minelli, Alessandro, 2012, Species diversity of Strigamia Gray, 1843 (Chilopoda: Linotaeniidae): a preliminary synthesis, pp. 1-39 in Zootaxa 3593 on page 11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.214898
Federated Learning for Urban Energy Efficiency: Detecting Thermal with UAV-based Imaging and AI
Creators: name: Duda, Leonhard Johannes
name: Alibabaei, Khadijeh
name: Vollmer, Elena
name: Klug, Leon
name: Benz, Mishal
name: Kozlov, Valentin
name: Volk, Rebekka
name: Goetz, Markus
name: Schultmann, Frank
name: Streit, Achim
Publisher: name: Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)
Year: 2024
Subjects: Federated Learning
Deep Learning
Scalability and Efficiency

description: The fast and accurate localization of heat loss areas to increase energy efficiency can be improved by automating the detection of thermographic anomalies through UAV-based
thermal imaging combined with Deep Learning (DL). However, there are still challenges such as data sharing, resource constraints and privacy concerns in urban environments. Federated
Learning (FL) offers a solution by enabling privacy-preserving model training on decentralized devices, making it suitable for resource-constrained applications. Using NVFlare and the
U-NET segmentation model, we investigate Federated Learning (FL) for thermal hot spot detection based on urban features. The FL clients are selected based on the geographic location
of the image and help district heating network operators detect leakages in underground pipelines via false alarm removal.
Winnertzia nigra Mamaev
Creators: name: Jaschhof, Mathias
name: Jaschhof, Catrin
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2020
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Diptera
Cecidomyiidae
Winnertzia
Winnertzia nigra

description: Winnertzia nigra Mamaev
Diagnosis. A large, blackish-brown Winnertzia with distinctive male genitalia (Jaschhof & Jaschhof 2013: fig. 38C). The massive gonostylus is strongly bent apically, with the apical portion bearing (apart from ordinary setae) a small pectinate claw and dense, coarse microtrichia. Of the gonocoxal synsclerite, the ventral surface is conspicuously densely setose except for a non-setose portion basally, the ventral emargination is deeply V-shaped, and the dorsal apodemes are unusually short and thick. The tegmen, which is small in relation to the other genitalic structures, has small, sharply contoured flaps with fine microtrichia. The long, completely setose ninth tergite has the posterior edge slightly concave.
Distribution in Sweden. The only Swedish specimen known to us is a male collected in Småland, southern Sweden (Jaschhof & Jaschhof 2013).
description: Published as part of Jaschhof, Mathias & Jaschhof, Catrin, 2020, Reevaluation of species richness in Winnertzia (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae, Winnertziinae), with descriptions of 37 new species from Sweden, Peru and Australia, pp. 1-72 in Zootaxa 4829 (1) on page 38, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4829.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4402757
Strigamia chionophila Wood 1862
Creators: name: Bonato, Lucio
name: Dányi, László
name: Socci, Antonio Augusto
name: Minelli, Alessandro
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2012
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Chilopoda
Geophilomorpha
Linotaeniidae
Strigamia
Strigamia chionophila

description: Strigamia chionophila Wood, 1862
Synonym: Linotaenia miuropus Chamberlin, 1902.
References for morphology: Meinert 1886; McNeill 1888; Chamberlin 1902 (sub Linotaenia miuropus), 1911, 1912a; Johnson 1952.
Taxonomic notes. Described originally as a species of Strigamia, it was assigned subsequently to Linotaenia, Scolioplanes or Tomotaenia, until the classification under Strigamia prevailed after Crabill (1954b). It was suspected to be identical to S. acuminata (Chamberlin 1920, 1923, 1925; Eason 1964), but most authors maintained it as a distinct species and assigned many new specimens to it. After direct examination of American and European specimens confidently representative of S. chionophila and S. acuminata respectively, we confirm that the two species differ consistently in the presence vs. absence of sulci between the pretergite and the intercalary pleurites of the ultimate leg-bearing segment, which is one of the major interspecific characters in the genus (Table 1).
Linotaenia miuropus was described by Chamberlin (1902), cited under Scolioplanes by Attems (1929) and synonymized under S. chionophila by the same Chamberlin (1925, 1961).
Distribution: northern and western part of North America, northwards to subarctic regions of Alaska and Canada, southwards to California along the Rocky Mountains, Kentucky and Virginia; extending westwards through the Aleutian Islands to at least the Behring Island. Published records of S. acuminata from Japan could actually refer to S. chionophila.
description: Published as part of Bonato, Lucio, Dányi, László, Socci, Antonio Augusto & Minelli, Alessandro, 2012, Species diversity of Strigamia Gray, 1843 (Chilopoda: Linotaeniidae): a preliminary synthesis, pp. 1-39 in Zootaxa 3593 on page 11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.214898
MOLIYAVIY XISOBOTLAR TUZISH VA TAXLIL QILISH
Creators: name: Mirzayev, Umidjon
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2025

description: Mazkur maqolada moliyaviy xisobotlar tuzish va taxlil qilish ko’rib chiqilgan. Moliyaviy hisobot berish buxgalteriya hisobining yakuniy bosqichidir. Moliyaviy hisobotda buxgalteriya ob'ektlarini ularning iqtisodiy tarkibiga mos keladigan turlari bo'yicha kengaytirilgan guruhlanishi tufayli korxona moliyaviy-xo'jalik faoliyatini tavsiflovchi ko'rsatkichlar tizimi mavjud. Moliyaviy tahlil jarayonida bir qator maxsus usullar qo'llaniladi.
Viriola minuta W. H. Turton 1932
Creators: name: Bakker, Piet A. J.
name: Albano, Paolo G.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Mollusca
Gastropoda
Triphoridae
Viriola
Viriola minuta

description: Viriola minuta W.H. Turton, 1932
Viriola minuta W.H. Turton, 1932: 120, pl. 26, fig. 874.
Type locality. South Africa, Port Alfred.
Type material. Type material not located so far.
Distribution. South Africa (Turton 1932).
description: Published as part of Bakker, Piet A. J. & Albano, Paolo G., 2022, Nomenclator, geographic and stratigraphic distribution of the family Triphoridae (Mollusca: Gastropoda), pp. 1-216 in Zootaxa 5088 (1) on page 117, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5088.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5836536
Strigamia cottiana Verhoeff 1935
Creators: name: Bonato, Lucio
name: Dányi, László
name: Socci, Antonio Augusto
name: Minelli, Alessandro
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2012
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Chilopoda
Geophilomorpha
Linotaeniidae
Strigamia
Strigamia cottiana

description: Strigamia cottiana (Verhoeff, 1935)
Synonym: Scolioplanes dalmazzensis Verhoeff 1935.
References for morphology: Verhoeff 1935 (also sub Scolioplanes dalmazzensis); Iorio, 2008. Taxonomic notes. Described originally as a species of Scolioplanes, it was assigned to Strigamia by Minelli & Zapparoli (1985). Doubts were occasionally expressed as to its distinction from S. acuminata (Minelli & Zapparoli 1985, 1992), but it has been maintained as a distinct species since Foddai et al. (1995).
Scolioplanes dalmazzensis was described by Verhoeff (1935) in the same publication in which he described S. cottiana. Its validity was rejected by Minelli & Zapparoli (1985, 1992), who submerged it under S. acuminata together with S. cottiana. Foddai et al. (1995) considered S. dalmazzensis to be identical to S. cottiana, and adopted the latter as the valid name for the species (I.C.Z.N. 1999: art. 24.2). We confirm the synonymy between the two species, because their original descriptions are fully consistent in all characters of recognized taxonomic value, including the number of trunk segments that is unusually high for a Strigamia species in Europe. Only minor differences were described by Verhoeff (1935) between the holotypes of the two species, regarding relative size of the second maxillary claw and shape of the anterior margin of the forcipular coxosternite, the basal denticle of tarsungulum and the posterior margin of the ultimate metasternite; such minor differences are expected within intraspecific variation. It is worth noting that the type localities of the two species are close to each other (see Appendix 2).
Distribution: Cottian and Maritime Alps.
description: Published as part of Bonato, Lucio, Dányi, László, Socci, Antonio Augusto & Minelli, Alessandro, 2012, Species diversity of Strigamia Gray, 1843 (Chilopoda: Linotaeniidae): a preliminary synthesis, pp. 1-39 in Zootaxa 3593 on page 12, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.214898
Triphoris minutissima Tapparone-Canefri 1877
Creators: name: Bakker, Piet A. J.
name: Albano, Paolo G.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Mollusca
Gastropoda
Triphoridae
Triphoris
Triphoris minutissima

description: Triphoris minutissima Tapparone-Canefri, 1877
Triphoris minutissimus Tapparone-Canefri, 1877: 283.
Triforis minutissimus Tapparone-Canefri, 1877 — Tryon 1887: 190.
Type locality. Papua New Guinea.
Type material. Type material not located so far.
Distribution. Papua New Guinea (Tapparone-Canefri 1877; Tryon 1887; Paetel 1888).
Remarks. The genus Triphoris is of feminine gender, therefore the name should be Triphoris minutissima.
description: Published as part of Bakker, Piet A. J. & Albano, Paolo G., 2022, Nomenclator, geographic and stratigraphic distribution of the family Triphoridae (Mollusca: Gastropoda), pp. 1-216 in Zootaxa 5088 (1) on page 117, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5088.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5836536
Cautor minutulus Kosuge 1974
Creators: name: Bakker, Piet A. J.
name: Albano, Paolo G.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Mollusca
Gastropoda
Triphoridae
Cautor
Cautor minutulus

description: Cautor minutulus Kosuge, 1974
Cautor minutula Kosuge, 1974: 5, pl. 1, fig. 6.
Cautor minutulus Kosuge, 1974 — Smith 2003: 259.
Type locality. United States, Guam, Mariana Islands.
Type material. USNM 614032, holotype.
Distribution. United States, Guam (Kosuge 1974; Smith 2003).
Remarks. The genus Cautor is of masculine gender, therefore the name should be Cautor minutulus.
description: Published as part of Bakker, Piet A. J. & Albano, Paolo G., 2022, Nomenclator, geographic and stratigraphic distribution of the family Triphoridae (Mollusca: Gastropoda), pp. 1-216 in Zootaxa 5088 (1) on page 117, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5088.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5836536
TEXNOLOGIK O'ZGARISHLAR SHAROITIDA TA'LIMNING KELAJAGI
Creators: name: Shirinova, Shahlola
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2025

description: Bugungi kunda texnologiyaning tezkor rivojlanishi insoniyat hayotining barcha sohalariga, xususan, ta'lim tizimiga ulkan ta'sir ko'rsatmoqda. Xalqaro miqyosda yangi texnologiyalar ta'lim jarayonini yanada samarali va interaktiv qilish uchun foydalanilmoqda. Global miqyosda integratsiyalashgan raqamli vositalar va platformalar ta'lim metodikasini yangilashga yordam bermoqda. Shu nuqtai nazardan, texnologik o'zgarishlar sharoitida ta'limning kelajagi qanday bo'lishi, uning yangi imkoniyatlari, muammolari va istiqbollari ilmiy muhokama qilishni talab etadi.
Winnertzia parvispina Jaschhof
Creators: name: Jaschhof, Mathias
name: Jaschhof, Catrin
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2020
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Diptera
Cecidomyiidae
Winnertzia
Winnertzia parvispina

description: Winnertzia parvispina Jaschhof
Diagnosis. A medium-sized, brown Winnertzia with distinctive male genitalia, as follows (Jaschhof & Jaschhof 2013: fig. 41B–C). The parallel-sided, markedly bent gonostylus has a conspicuously small claw, which consists of only 4–6 widely spaced, subtriangular spines. We are not aware of another Winnertzia with this kind of gonostylar claw. Of the gonocoxal synsclerite, which is massive in relation to the gonostylar size, the ventral emargination is an unusually deep, narrow U-shape, accompanied basally by a small membranous area; and the dorsal transverse bridge, which is conspicuously straight (as opposed to concave, the outline usually found in Winnertzia), is twice as broad as the dorsal apodeme length. The posterior edge of the ninth tergite, which is markedly narrowed, has a perfectly sinuous outline.
Distribution in Sweden. All the 19 males we have studied of W. parvispina come from the southern quarter of Sweden, with Östergötland as the northernmost distribution.
Material studied. Specimens listed by Jaschhof & Jaschhof (2013) and as follows. Sweden: 1 male, Småland, Nybro, Bäckebo, Grytsjön NR, old-growth aspen forest, 2–12 July 2005, MT, SMTP (trap 1000, collection event 1323) (spn CEC2878); 2 males, same locality but mixed boreal forest, 17 June–16 July 2015, MT, MCJ (spns CEC2877 and CEC2879); 1 male, Öland, Mörbylånga, Kalkstad NR, mixed broadleaf forest, 28 August–24 September 2014, MT, MCJ (spn CEC2875); 1 male, Mörbylånga, Ullevi, herb-rich meadow, 24 May–13 June 2015, MT, MCJ (spn CEC2876) (all in SDEI).
description: Published as part of Jaschhof, Mathias & Jaschhof, Catrin, 2020, Reevaluation of species richness in Winnertzia (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae, Winnertziinae), with descriptions of 37 new species from Sweden, Peru and Australia, pp. 1-72 in Zootaxa 4829 (1) on page 40, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4829.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4402757
Strigamia crinita Attems 1929
Creators: name: Bonato, Lucio
name: Dányi, László
name: Socci, Antonio Augusto
name: Minelli, Alessandro
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2012
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Chilopoda
Geophilomorpha
Linotaeniidae
Strigamia
Strigamia crinita

description: Strigamia crinita (Attems, 1929)
References for morphology: Attems 1929; Verhoeff 1935; Matic & Darabantu 1968; Matic 1972. Taxonomic notes. Described originally as a species of Scolioplanes, it was assigned to Strigamia by Matic & Darabantu (1968) and its validity was never questioned.
Distribution: eastern and southern Carpathians.
description: Published as part of Bonato, Lucio, Dányi, László, Socci, Antonio Augusto & Minelli, Alessandro, 2012, Species diversity of Strigamia Gray, 1843 (Chilopoda: Linotaeniidae): a preliminary synthesis, pp. 1-39 in Zootaxa 3593 on page 13, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.214898
Strigamia engadina Verhoeff 1935
Creators: name: Bonato, Lucio
name: Dányi, László
name: Socci, Antonio Augusto
name: Minelli, Alessandro
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2012
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Chilopoda
Geophilomorpha
Linotaeniidae
Strigamia
Strigamia engadina

description: Strigamia engadina (Verhoeff, 1935)
Synonyms: Scolioplanes mendelanus Verhoeff, 1935; Scolioplanes engadinus rodnaensis Verhoeff, 1935.
References for morphology: Verhoeff 1935 (also sub Scolioplanes mendelanus and Scolioplanes engadinus rodnaensis); Stoev 2002.
Taxonomic notes. Described originally as a species of Scolioplanes, together with the two subspecies S. engadinus banaticus and S. engadinus rodnaensis, it was assigned to Strigamia by Matic & Darabantu (1968). It was cited repeatedly as valid by recent authors, who assigned other specimens to S. engadina, however following different criteria to identify the species (e.g.: Verhoeff 1935; Matic 1972; Stoev 2002). Conversely, the subspecies banaticus and rodnaensis were cited rarely by subsequent authors and ignored since Matic (1972), who listed both of them as synonyms of S. engadina. However, based on their original descriptions, only rodnaensis can be recognized as conspecific with S. engadina, whereas banaticus actually corresponds to S. acuminata (see above under S. acuminata). Also the range of variation in the segment number reported by some authors (e.g., Matic & Darabantu 1968; Matic 1972; Kaczmarek 1979) suggests that specimens of S. acuminata have been probably misidentified sometimes as S. engadina.
Scolioplanes mendelanus was described by Verhoeff (1935) in the same publication in which he described S. engadinus. The two nominal taxa were considered identical by Foddai et al. (1995), who adopted S. engadina as the valid name for the species (I.C.Z.N. 1999: art. 24.2). We confirm the synonymy between the two species, because their original descriptions are fully consistent in all characters recognized of taxonomic value; the only differences recorded by Verhoeff (1935) between the holotype of S. mendelanus and the two syntypes of S. engadinus are minor differences expected to be within intraspecific variation, regarding the shape of the basal denticle of the forcipular tarsungulum, the ultimate metasternite, the distal article of the ultimate leg, and the number and size of the coxal pores. It is also worth noting that the type localities of the two species are close to each other (see Appendix 2).
Distribution: Alps, Carpathians and Dinarides. Published records from Pyrenees, central Appennines and other regions in the Balkan peninsula need confirmation, because they are possibly based on misidentified specimens of S. acuminata or S. transsilvanica (see under “Taxonomic notes”).
description: Published as part of Bonato, Lucio, Dányi, László, Socci, Antonio Augusto & Minelli, Alessandro, 2012, Species diversity of Strigamia Gray, 1843 (Chilopoda: Linotaeniidae): a preliminary synthesis, pp. 1-39 in Zootaxa 3593 on page 13, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.214898
Triphora miopygmaea Landau, Ceulemans & Van Dingenen 2018
Creators: name: Bakker, Piet A. J.
name: Albano, Paolo G.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Mollusca
Gastropoda
Triphoridae
Triphora
Triphora miopygmaea

description: † Triphora miopygmaea Landau, Ceulemans & Van Dingenen, 2018
Triphora miopygmaea Landau, Ceulemans & Van Dingenen, 2018: 227, pl. 52, fig. 1–3.
Type locality. France, Le Grand Chauvereau, St.–Clément–de–la–Place, Maine–et– Loire.
Type stratum. Upper Miocene, Tortonian.
Type material. MNHN.F.A57944, holotype. MNHN.F.A57945, NHMW2016 /0103/1512, NHMW 2016 /0103/1513, RGM.1348712 and RGM.1348713, paratypes.
Distribution. France (Landau et al. 2018).
Geological age. Miocene (Landau et al. 2018).
(†) Cerithium mirabile C.B. Adams, 1850
Cerithium mirabile C.B. Adams, 1850: 118.
Triforis mirabilis (C.B. Adams, 1850) — Tryon 1887: 188.
Triphora mirabile (C.B. Adams, 1850) — Nowell-Usticke 1959: 43.
Iniforis mirabile (C.B. Adams, 1850) — Rolán & Fernández-Garcés 2007: 16.
Type locality. Jamaica.
Type material. MCZ 154353, holotype.
Distribution. Jamaica (Adams 1850; Dall 1889b; Clench & Turner 1950), United States, Florida (Dall 1892), United States Virgin Islands, Saint Croix (Nowell-Usticke 1959).
Geological age. Pliocene (Dall 1892).
Remarks. Rolán & Fernández-Garcés (1993) considered this species a junior synonym of Turbo turristhomae Holten, 1802.
description: Published as part of Bakker, Piet A. J. & Albano, Paolo G., 2022, Nomenclator, geographic and stratigraphic distribution of the family Triphoridae (Mollusca: Gastropoda), pp. 1-216 in Zootaxa 5088 (1) on pages 117-118, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5088.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5836536
Triphoris mirifica Deshayes 1863
Creators: name: Bakker, Piet A. J.
name: Albano, Paolo G.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Mollusca
Gastropoda
Triphoridae
Triphoris
Triphoris mirifica

description: Triphoris mirifica Deshayes, 1863
Triphoris mirificus Deshayes, 1863: 104, pl. 21, fig. 32–33.
Triforis mirifica Deshayes, 1863 — Martens 1880: 283.
Triforis mirificus Deshayes, 1863 — Tryon 1887: 182, pl. 38, fig. 10.
Trifora mirifica Deshayes, 1863 — Viader 1937: 43.
Triphora mirifica Deshayes, 1863 — Jay 2007: 39, fig. 20–22, 52.
Type locality. Reunion.
Neotype type locality. Reunion, Cape La Houssaye, Saint Paul, 10 m deep.
Type material. MNHN-IM-2000-9491, neotype.
Distribution. French Polynesia (Boutet et al. 2020), Madagascar (Dautzenberg 1923), Marshall Islands (Smith 1884), Mauritius (Viader 1937), New Caledonia (Héros et al. 2007), Reunion (Deshayes 1863; Martens 1880; Tryon 1887; Paetel 1888; Jay 2007).
Remarks. The genus Triphoris is of feminine gender, therefore the name should be Triphoris mirifica. Neotype designated by Jay (2007).
description: Published as part of Bakker, Piet A. J. & Albano, Paolo G., 2022, Nomenclator, geographic and stratigraphic distribution of the family Triphoridae (Mollusca: Gastropoda), pp. 1-216 in Zootaxa 5088 (1) on page 118, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5088.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5836536
Strigamia epileptica Wood 1862
Creators: name: Bonato, Lucio
name: Dányi, László
name: Socci, Antonio Augusto
name: Minelli, Alessandro
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2012
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Chilopoda
Geophilomorpha
Linotaeniidae
Strigamia
Strigamia epileptica

description: Strigamia epileptica Wood, 1862
Synonyms: Scolioplanes imperialis Brölemann, 1896; Linotaenia rubelliana Chamberlin, 1904.
References for morphology: Wood 1862, 1865; Brölemann 1896 (sub Scolioplanes imperialis); Chamberlin 1904 (sub Linotaenia rubelliana), 1912b (sub Linotaenia laevipes), 1954.
Taxonomic notes. Described originally as a species of Strigamia, it was then assigned also to Linotaenia, Scolioplanes or Tomotaenia. Chamberlin (1912b, 1954, 1963) considered S. epileptica as identical with two other species described by Wood in the same paper (Wood 1862), namely S. laevipes and S. parviceps, and adopted first S. laevipes and later S. parviceps as the valid name for the species. Conversely, Crabill (1954a, 1962a) suggested adopting S. epileptica as the valid name because S. parviceps is actually of uncertain taxonomic position (see below under “Uncertain species”), while he did not take into account S. laevipes. Subsequent catalogues followed either Chamberlin’s later opinion (Kevan 1983; Mercurio 2010) or Crabill’s (Hoffman 1995). We agree with Crabill’s proposal in selecting S. epileptica as the valid name of the species, because it remains uncertain whether the name S. parviceps was originally applied to the same species (see below), whereas S. laevipes is recognized here as a distinct species.
Scolioplanes imperialis was described by Brölemann (1896) and Linotaenia rubelliana by Chamberlin (1904). Both were considered identical to S. epileptica by Chamberlin (1912b), who confirmed this opinion after examining the holotype of S. epileptica (Chamberlin 1954, 1963), irrespective of the fact that he did not adopt S. epileptica as the valid name of the species (see above). Instead, Attems (1929) maintained both S. imperialis and L. rubelliana as distinct valid species, and Crabill (1962a) considered them of uncertain identity. The synonymy is confirmed here for both species because their type specimens, based on the published descriptions (Brölemann 1896; Chamberlin 1904, 1963) are fully congruent with S. epileptica, also in some major diagnostic features of the latter including number of legs, aspect of pleuropretergite, shape of ultimate metasternite and arrangement of coxal pores.
Distribution: most of the western part of North America, along the Rocky Mountains, between British Columbia and California. Published records from more eastern regions need confirmation, because of possible confusion with other species.
description: Published as part of Bonato, Lucio, Dányi, László, Socci, Antonio Augusto & Minelli, Alessandro, 2012, Species diversity of Strigamia Gray, 1843 (Chilopoda: Linotaeniidae): a preliminary synthesis, pp. 1-39 in Zootaxa 3593 on pages 13-14, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.214898
Winnertzia solidaginis Felt 1907
Creators: name: Jaschhof, Mathias
name: Jaschhof, Catrin
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2020
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Diptera
Cecidomyiidae
Winnertzia
Winnertzia solidaginis

description: Winnertzia solidaginis Felt agg.
We have no doubt any more that W. solidaginis as circumscribed in our earlier revision of Swedish Winnertzia (Jaschhof & Jaschhof 2013: 96 ff., fig. 42) comprises several discrete species. However, although we reexamined the morphology of all our specimens, altogether 128 males from all over Sweden (Skåne to Lule Lappmark), the outcome was inconclusive. On the one hand, we noticed morphological distinctions among our specimens; on the other hand, we failed to group those distinctions into a reasonable number of morphotypes. Our conclusion is that male morphology alone cannot solve this issue. There is also the fact that W. solidaginis designates originally a North American species, as do its four synonyms (Gagné & Jaschhof 2017), which makes the whole matter considerably more complicated. For the time being we see no better solution than treating W. solidaginis as a species aggregate.
Material studied. Specimens listed by Jaschhof & Jaschhof (2013) and those numbered here CEC 3274– CEC 3334 (all in NHRS).
description: Published as part of Jaschhof, Mathias & Jaschhof, Catrin, 2020, Reevaluation of species richness in Winnertzia (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae, Winnertziinae), with descriptions of 37 new species from Sweden, Peru and Australia, pp. 1-72 in Zootaxa 4829 (1) on page 41, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4829.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4402757