Acceptability and performance of a nonwoven device for vaginal drug delivery among women and their male partners in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Creators: name: Hart, Catherine W.
name: Joanis, Carol
name: Hartmann, Miriam
name: Milford, Cecilia
name: Smit, Jennifer
name: Mags Beksinska
name: Rambally-Greener, Letitia
name: Pienaar, Jacqui
name: Zonke Mabude
name: Butterworth, George A. M.
name: Sokal, David
name: Jenkins, David
Publisher: name: Taylor & Francis
Year: 2019
Subjects: subject: Space Science
subject: Medicine
subject: Microbiology
subject: FOS: Biological sciences
subject: FOS: Biological sciences
subject: Pharmacology
subject: Biotechnology
subject: Cancer
subject: Science Policy
subject: 110309 Infectious Diseases
subject: FOS: Health sciences
subject: FOS: Health sciences

description: <b>Background:</b> Multipurpose prevention technologies are needed to provide protection against HIV and sexually transmitted infections. Gel-based vaginal microbicides inserted via an applicator are prone to leakage. A novel device for vaginal drug delivery was developed to contain gel-based formulations, aiming to improve gel retention and reduce leakage. The objectives of this study were to assess acceptability and performance of a nonwoven vaginal delivery device. <b>Methods:</b> A nonwoven vaginal delivery device was prepared, pre-saturated with a commercially available water-based lubricant, with a finger pocket for insertion and string for removal. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to collect data from interviews with 40 women and 10 male partners recruited from a sexual and reproductive health clinic in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Women wore one device in the clinic and one device overnight or with their partner during intercourse. The primary endpoint was acceptability including comfort, ease of insertion and removal, and opinions on device attributes. <b>Results:</b> Most women said the device was ‘easy’ to insert and remove. Six women reported leakage after insertion and 34 reported having sexual intercourse while wearing the device. One woman was lost-to-follow-up and five women only wore the device overnight because their partners did not agree to intercourse with the inserted device. The best-liked attribute was the device’s lubrication (22 women, 7 men); the least-liked was the removal string (9 women, 8 men). <b>Conclusions:</b> Data are promising for further development of this nonwoven device for vaginal drug delivery. <b>Plain English summary</b> Multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs) that protect against HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are urgently needed. A variety of vaginal gel-based products are actively being researched; however, these products can often have challenges with vaginal leakage and retention. This research investigates the acceptability and performance of a nonwoven device to deliver vaginal gel formulations. The gel used in this study was a currently available marketed personal lubricant. In South Africa, 40 women (and 10 male partners) were recruited and given the opportunity to comment on various device attributes after insertion, overnight wear and sexual intercourse with their male partners. Generally, participants found the device easy to use and acceptable, where many factors possibly contributed to the device’s acceptability (i.e., similarity to tampons, saturation with lubricant, minimal leakage, ease of insertion, comfort during intercourse and the male partners’ willingness to have vaginal intercourse with the device in place). Further studies of the vaginal delivery device for acceptability, safety and efficacy using a gel-based formulation with an active ingredient are warranted.