Additional file 1 of Reasons for admission and variance of body weight at referral in female inpatients with anorexia nervosa in Germany
Creators: name: Peters, Triinu
name: Kolar, David
name: Föcker, Manuel
name: Bühren, Katharina
name: Dahmen, Brigitte
name: Becker, Katja
name: Weber, Linda
name: Correll, Christoph U.
name: Jaite, Charlotte
name: Egberts, Karin M.
name: Romanos, Marcel
name: Ehrlich, Stefan
name: Seidel, Maria
name: Roessner, Veit
name: Fleischhaker, Christian
name: von Gontard, Alexander
name: Hahn, Freia
name: Huss, Michael
name: Kaess, Michael
name: Legenbauer, Tanja
name: Renner, Tobias J.
name: Schulze, Ulrike M. E.
name: Sinzig, Judith
name: Wessing, Ida
name: Antony, Gisela
name: Herpertz-Dahlmann, Beate
name: Gradl-Dietsch, Gertraud
name: Hebebrand, Johannes
Publisher: name: figshare
Year: 2021
Subjects: subject: Medicine
subject: Biotechnology
subject: Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified
subject: Immunology
subject: FOS: Clinical medicine
subject: Science Policy

description: Additional file 1: Table S1. Polychoric correlations between items (reasons for seeking inpatient treatment) given by patients. Table S2. Polychoric correlations between items (reasons for seeking inpatient treatment) given by parents. Table S3. Results of regression analyses with BMI-SDS as outcome (n = 360) according to model Ib (see Table 4) supplemented by single reasons for inpatient admission based on reasons (total number = 23). a Given by patients (each row represents a single regression analysis; slight changes for items premorbid BMI-SDS and age not shown). The change in R2 (ΔR2) indicates the improvement of the model compared to model Ib. Nominally (p &lt; 0.05) significant items/reasons are bolded. b Given by parents (each row represents a single regression analysis; slight changes for items premorbid BMI-SDS and age not shown). The change in R2 (ΔR2) indicates the improvement of the model compared to model Ib. Nominally (p &lt; 0.05) significant items/reasons are bolded. Table S4. Sample characteristics for post-hoc analyses about BMI-SDS at discharge (n = 337). Table S5. Correlation coefficients between measurements at onset of AN, at admission and at discharge. Table S6. Results of regression model with BMI-SDS at discharge as outcome (n = 337). a According to model in the Additional file 1: Table S6 supplemented by single reasons for inpatient admission based on reasons (total number = 23) given by parents (each row represents a single regression analysis; slight changes for items premorbid BMI-SDS, BMI-SDS at admission, treatment duration, weight gain per treatment week and age not shown). The change in R2 (ΔR2) indicates the improvement of the model compared to model from Additional file 1: Table S4. Nominally (p &lt; 0.05) significant items/reasons are bolded. b Including predictors from Additional file 1: Table S6 and single reasons for inpatient admission based on reasons (total number = 23) given by parents. Figure S1. Scree plot from principal component analysis of patients data. Figure S2. Scree plot from principal component analysis of parents data. Figure S3. Histogram of the model residuals from PCA with 4 components, n = 471, patients. Figure S4. Histogram of the model residuals from PCA with 4 components, n = 470, parents.