6.1 Be Careful What You Wish For – Unexpected Policy Consequences
Creators: name: Kingsley, Danny Abigail
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2015
Subjects: conflict, policy changes, funding, UK

description: The open access policy landscape in the UK is currently very convoluted and in some cases conflicted. For example, both the Research Councils of UK and Higher Education Funding Council of England have policies requiring open access to research outputs. In the first instance, there is an emphasis on open access publication with block grants to cover the costs; with the latter there is a requirement to have the author’s accepted manuscript in a repository within three months of acceptance if the work is to be eligible for consideration in the 2020 Research Excellence Framework. As institutions turn their attention to compliance the conflicting policy requirements mean there has been a dilution of the open access message. The role of open access managers has moved from a traditional focus on support and advocacy to a responsibility for enforcing compliance. In some cases the systems in place to manage compliance are working against academic engagement with open access. It is instructive to look at feedback from the academic community about what they think is required of them, by whom and when. This approach demonstrates how complex the policy landscape has become, where in some cases the academic response has been to disengage completely. This paper will explore some of the challenges faced by the University of Cambridge with implementing compliance solutions, and how these are being addressed. There are positive aspects of these policy changes, however. Funding compliance has forced traditionally separate administrative centres within institutions to work more closely together. The University of Cambridge has actively pursued interdepartmental collaboration with the appointment of several roles that are shared across the Research Office and Library. In addition, the need to develop compliance systems that sit within existing academic communication practices will potentially increase engagement with open access into the longer term. <strong>Dr Danny Kingsley</strong> began in the new role of Head of Scholarly Communication at the University of Cambridge in January 2015. She is responsible for the open access programme with a wider remit of open data and transitioning towards new scholarly communication practices. Danny came to the UK from Australia, and remains a Visiting Fellow of the Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science at the Australian National University. Her research centres on scholarly communication with a specific interest in open access, research assessment, peer review, authorship and higher education. She completed her PhD looking at the barriers to opening up access to science publications in 2008. She is a committee member of the Australian Academy of Sciences National Committee for Data in Science. Her previous role was as Executive Officer of the Australian Open Access Support Group, which aims to inform the discussions around open access at a time of great change in this area. She was responsible for developing the content on the AOASG website including explainers, blogs and general information about the topic. She ran a discussion list and Twitter feed as part of the outreach activities of the group. Prior to this she was Manager, Scholarly Communication and ePublishing, at the Australian National University. She was responsible for developing policies relating to scholarly communication and open access, and rebuilt the DSpace repository prior to its July 2011 relaunch. She also worked as an Associate Lecturer (parttime) in science communication.