Myzininae Ashmead 1899
Creators: name: Liao, Xiang-Ping
name: Chen, Bin
name: Li, Ting-Jing
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hymenoptera
Tiphiidae

description: Key to all the species of the subfamily Myzininae from China (excluding the genus Mesa)
♀♀
1. CM (R 1 vein always detached from the wing border) and CSM I–III of fore wing normal, not fused together (Fig. 1); pterostigma obsolete (Fig. 1); T6 (Fig. 8) more and less punctate....................................................... 2
- CM and CSM III of fore wing fused together into the CPM, and CSM I–II present, the second always petiolate (Fig. 63); pterostigma present (Fig. 63); T6 (Fig. 68) quite smooth and mostly impunctate.................................... 6
2. Anterior surface of mesopleuron concave; head square (Fig. 18), posterior corner more or less protruding backward.........................................................................................3 (Hylomesa Krombein)
- Anterior surface of mesopleuron flat; head not square, posterior corner not protruding backward.............................................................................................. Mesa Saussure (see Liao et al. 2021)
3. Vertex (Fig. 3) close to posterior ocelli with dense punctures and close to occipital carina with sparse punctures; dorsum of propodeum (Fig. 6) largely and irregularly punctate on horizontal surface............ H. punctata Liao, Chen & Li, sp. nov.
- Vertex (Figs 10, 18) near posterior ocelli with few sparse punctures, near occipital carina mostly impunctate; dorsum of propodeum (Fig. 12) largely impunctate on horizontal surface...................................................... 4
4. Head (Fig. 25) wholly black; propodeum (Fig. 31) with narrow median groove, base of groove almost as wide as apex..................................................................................... H. taiwana Tsuneki, 1986
- Head (Figs 9, 16) mostly red, propodeum (Figs 12, 22) with broad median groove, base of groove much wider than apex... 5
5. Ventral surface of hind femur (Fig. 13) medially with long acute prominence; anterior ocellus closer to occiput than to apex of antennal tubercle (Fig. 10).......................................................... H. bakeri Krombein, 1968
- Ventral surface of hind femur (Fig. 21) medially with short obtuse prominence; anterior ocellus closer to apex of antennal tubercle than to occiput (Fig. 18)...................................................... H. longiceps (Turner, 1918)
6. Pam and Pal always 6- and 4- segmented, respectively; ventral surface of the 2 nd fore tarsomere with row of dense short whitish bristles at apex (Fig. 29 in Boni Bartalccui, 2004b)............................................... 7 (Meria Illiger)
- Pam and Pal always more or less reduced; fore tibia and tarsus without dense short bristles (Fig. 284 in Boni Bartalccui, 2004b)............................................................................................. 11
7. Dorsum of propodeum largely striate laterally, medially with numerous deep punctures; lateral light spots on T2–T4 very large, the distance between two lateral spots less than the length of the spot (Fig. 127 in Boni Bartalccui, 2011a)............................................................................................ M. aurantiaca (Guérin, 1837)
- Dorsum of propodeum basally striate laterally, medially largely smooth (Fig. 76); lateral light spots on T2–T4 or T2–T3 comparatively smaller (Fig. 77), distance between two lateral spots more than or at least equal to the length of the spot........ 8
8. Head square, as high as wide in frontal view, elongated behind eyes....................... M. dorsalis (Fabricius, 1804)
- Head distinctly wider than high in frontal view (Figs 65, 73), rounded behind eyes................................. 9
9. Head dark red; distance between two lateral spots on T2–T4 equal to the length of the spot................................................................................................. M. askhabadensis Radoszkowski, 1886
- Head dark brown to black; distance between two lateral spots on T2–T4 much greater than the length of the spot (Figs 68, 77) .................................................................................................. 10
10. Anterior margin of clypeus straight (Fig. 65); T1 (Fig. 68) subapically with a row of punctures and medially absent, forming incomplete groove................................................................ M. discussa Guiglia, 1973
- Anterior margin of clypeus rounded (Fig. 73); T1 (Fig. 77) subapically with a row of punctures, forming complete groove............................................................................ M. sanguinicollis Morawitz, 1893
11. Scape with a stripe of densely packed punctures bearing long setae, these setae as long as scape; T6 without subapical groove............................................................. Poecilotiphia brevicauda kaszabi (Guiglia, 1965)
- Scape with sparser punctures, not forming a stripe, setae shorter than scape; T6 subapically with a row of punctures medially absent, forming incomplete groove......................................... Komarowia mongolina (Guiglia, 1965)
♂♂
1. Hypostomal carina directed laterally toward outer mandibular condyle (Fig. 27); length of S7 0.4–0.5× length of T7 (Fig. 36) in lateral view........................................................................................ 2
- Hypostomal carina not directed laterally, still reaching inner mandibular condyle (Fig. 74); length of S7 more than half of T7 (Fig. 50) in lateral view................................................................................ 5
2. Hind coxa carinate along dorsal margin; T1 (Fig. 34) anteriorly carinate........................3 (Hylomesa Krombein)
- Hind coxa not carinate along dorsal margin; T1 anteriorly not carinate............... Mesa Saussure (see Liao et al. 2021)
3. Head wholly black; anterior two-thirds of pronotum (Fig. 30) with transverse grooves and posterior third with a few sparse minute punctures................................................................. H. taiwana Tsuneki, 1986
- Head usually red; pronotum sparsely punctate or densely punctate in a few transverse grooves........................ 4
4. Pronotum anteriorly moderately carinate, with sparse punctures............................ H. bakeri Krombein, 1968
- Pronotum anteriorly strongly carinate, with weak to strong dense punctures in a few transverse grooves................................................................................................ H. longiceps (Turner, 1918)
5. Inner margin of eye with deep notch (Figs 45, 58); T7 (Fig. 49) with deep notch........................................................................................................................... 6 (Meria Illiger)
- Inner margin of eye lightly bent or almost straight (Figs 38, 82), without deep notch; T7 (Figs 43, 85) with comparatively shallow notch.......................................................................................... 10
6. Pronotal transverse carina (Fig. 53) anteriorly complete and not absent; lateral side of pronotum (Fig. 54) antero-ventrally densely punctate, without striae; ventral surface of mid femur with sparse punctures and setae...................................................................................................... M. dorsalis (Fabricius, 1804)
- Pronotal transverse carina anteriorly present and more or less absent (Fig. 46); lateral side of pronotum (Fig. 47) antero-ventrally densely strio-punctate or striate; ventral surface of mid femur smooth, without punctures nor setae................ 7
7. T3–T5 (Fig. 48) wholly with dense punctures; clypeus wholly with dense punctures (Fig. 45).. M. aurantiaca (Guérin, 1837)
- T3–T5 (Fig. 69) basally with dense or sparse punctures, apically impunctate and smooth; clypeus with moderate to sparse punctures (Fig. 58).................................................................................... 8
8. T7 (Fig. 79) with dense deep punctures; tipped lobes of T7 (Fig. 79) pointed............ M. sanguinicollis Morawitz, 1890
- T7 (Fig. 62, 70) with sparse shallow punctures; tipped lobes of T7 (Fig. 62, 70) rounded............................. 9
9. Dorsum of pronotum (Figs 59) anteriorly with dense punctures, posteriorly with moderate punctures; T3–T5 (Fig. 61) basally with large dense punctures................................................ M. askhabadensis Radoszkowski, 1886
- Dorsum of pronotum (Fig. 67) wholly with sparse punctures; T3–T5 (Fig. 69) basally with sparse and comparatively smaller punctures........................................................................ M. discussa Guiglia, 1973
10. Ocelli conspicuously enlarged, posterior ocelli distinctly convex in frontal view (Fig. 38); frons without smooth subtriangular area (Fig. 39); T7 (Fig. 43) with deep punctures, apex smooth and impunctate....... Komarowia mongolina (Guiglia, 1965)
- Ocelli normal, posterior ocelli not convex in frontal view (Fig. 81); frons with smooth subtriangular area corresponding to anterior ocellus (Fig. 82); lateral side of T7 (Fig. 85) densely punctate, medially smooth and impunctate.............................................................................. Poecilotiphia brevicauda kaszabi (Guiglia, 1965)
description: Published as part of Liao, Xiang-Ping, Chen, Bin & Li, Ting-Jing, 2022, A taxonomic revision of the subfamily Myzininae from China, with a key to the Chinese species (Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae), pp. 152-174 in Zootaxa 5154 (2) on pages 153-154, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5154.2.3, http://zenodo.org/record/6641314