title: Ð¡ÑÑÑÐºÑÑÑÐ° ÑÐ¾Ð»ÐºÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð°. ÐÑÐ½Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¸ Ð´Ð¾Ð¿ÑÑÑÐ¸Ð¼ÑÐµ Ð¿ÑÐµÐ´ÐµÐ»Ñ ÑÑÑÐµÑÑÐ²Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð±ÐµÐ»Ð¾Ð² Ð² Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ðµ
title: Ð²ÑÐ¿ÑÑÐºÐ½Ð°Ñ ÐºÐ²Ð°Ð»Ð¸ÑÐ¸ÐºÐ°ÑÐ¸Ð¾Ð½Ð½Ð°Ñ ÑÐ°Ð±Ð¾ÑÐ° Ð±Ð°ÐºÐ°Ð»Ð°Ð²ÑÐ°
titleType: Subtitle
title: Structure of the interpretation of law. The grounds and permissible limits for the existence of gaps in law
Creators: name: ÐÑÑÑÐ·Ð¾Ð²Ð°, Ð¡Ð¾ÑÐ¸Ñ
Publisher: name: Ð¡Ð°Ð½ÐºÑ-ÐÐµÑÐµÑÐ±ÑÑÐ³ÑÐºÐ¸Ð¹ Ð¿Ð¾Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÑÐ½Ð¸ÑÐµÑÐºÐ¸Ð¹ ÑÐ½Ð¸Ð²ÐµÑÑÐ¸ÑÐµÑ ÐÐµÑÑÐ° ÐÐµÐ»Ð¸ÐºÐ¾Ð³Ð¾
Year: 2020
Subjects: ÑÐ¾Ð»ÐºÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ðµ Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð°
Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð±ÐµÐ»Ñ Ð² Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ðµ
Ð°Ð½Ð°Ð»Ð¾Ð³Ð¸Ñ Ð·Ð°ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð°
Ð°Ð½Ð°Ð»Ð¾Ð³Ð¸Ñ Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð°
Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ñ Ð°Ð½Ð°Ð»Ð¾Ð³Ð¸Ñ
Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð¾Ð²Ð¾Ðµ ÑÐµÐ³ÑÐ»Ð¸ÑÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ðµ
Ð·Ð°ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð¾ÑÐ²Ð¾ÑÑÐµÑÐºÐ¸Ð¹ Ð¿ÑÐ¾ÑÐµÑÑ
interpretation of law
gaps in law
legal analogy
legal regulation
legislative process

description: Ð¢ÐµÐ¼Ð° Ð²ÑÐ¿ÑÑÐºÐ½Ð¾Ð¹ ÐºÐ²Ð°Ð»Ð¸ÑÐ¸ÐºÐ°ÑÐ¸Ð¾Ð½Ð½Ð¾Ð¹ ÑÐ°Ð±Ð¾ÑÑ: Â«Ð¡ÑÑÑÐºÑÑÑÐ° ÑÐ¾Ð»ÐºÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð°. ÐÑÐ½Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¸ Ð´Ð¾Ð¿ÑÑÑÐ¸Ð¼ÑÐµ Ð¿ÑÐµÐ´ÐµÐ»Ñ ÑÑÑÐµÑÑÐ²Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð±ÐµÐ»Ð¾Ð² Ð² Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²ÐµÂ». ÐÐ°Ð½Ð½Ð°Ñ ÑÐ°Ð±Ð¾ÑÐ° Ð¿Ð¾ÑÐ²ÑÑÐµÐ½Ð° Ð¸ÑÑÐ»ÐµÐ´Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¸Ð½ÑÑÐ¸ÑÑÑÐ° ÑÐ¾Ð»ÐºÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð°, Ð° ÑÐ°ÐºÐ¶Ðµ Ð¸ÑÑÐ»ÐµÐ´Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ ÑÐ°ÐºÐ¾Ð³Ð¾ ÑÐ²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ ÐºÐ°Ðº Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð±ÐµÐ»Ñ Ð² Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ðµ. ÐÐ°Ð´Ð°ÑÐ¸, ÐºÐ¾ÑÐ¾ÑÑÐµ ÑÐµÑÐ°Ð»Ð¸ÑÑ Ð² ÑÐ¾Ð´Ðµ Ð¸ÑÑÐ»ÐµÐ´Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ: 1. Ð°Ð½Ð°Ð»Ð¸Ð· Ð¾Ð±ÑÐµÐºÑÐ¸Ð²Ð½ÑÑ, ÑÑÐ±ÑÐµÐºÑÐ¸Ð²Ð½ÑÑ Ð¿ÑÐµÐ´Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐ»Ð¾Ðº ÑÐ¾Ð»ÐºÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð°; 2. ÑÐ°ÑÑÐ¼Ð¾ÑÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ðµ Ð¿Ð¾Ð½ÑÑÐ¸Ñ, ÑÐ¿Ð¾ÑÐ¾Ð±Ð¾Ð² Ð¸ Ð²Ð¸Ð´Ð¾Ð² ÑÐ¾Ð»ÐºÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð°; 3. Ð²ÑÑÐ²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ðµ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð±Ð»ÐµÐ¼ ÑÐ¾Ð»ÐºÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð° Ð² ÑÑÐ»Ð¾Ð²Ð¸ÑÑ ÑÐ¾Ð²ÑÐµÐ¼ÐµÐ½Ð½Ð¾ÑÑÐ¸; 4. Ð¾Ð¿ÑÐµÐ´ÐµÐ»ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ðµ Ð¿Ð¾Ð½ÑÑÐ¸Ñ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð±ÐµÐ»Ð° Ð² Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ðµ, Ð°Ð½Ð°Ð»Ð¸Ð· Ð¾Ð±ÑÐµÐºÑÐ¸Ð²Ð½ÑÑ Ð¸ ÑÑÐ±ÑÐµÐºÑÐ¸Ð²Ð½ÑÑ Ð¿ÑÐ¸ÑÐ¸Ð½ Ð²Ð¾Ð·Ð½Ð¸ÐºÐ½Ð¾Ð²ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð±ÐµÐ»Ð¾Ð² Ð² Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ðµ; 5. Ð¸ÑÑÐ»ÐµÐ´Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ðµ ÑÐ°ÑÐ°ÐºÑÐµÑÐ¸ÑÑÐ¸ÐºÐ¸ Ð¸Ð½ÑÑÐ¸ÑÑÑÐ¾Ð² Ð°Ð½Ð°Ð»Ð¾Ð³Ð¸Ð¸ Ð·Ð°ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð° Ð¸ Ð°Ð½Ð°Ð»Ð¾Ð³Ð¸Ð¸ Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð° ÐºÐ°Ðº ÑÐ¿Ð¾ÑÐ¾Ð±Ð¾Ð² Ð¿ÑÐµÐ¾Ð´Ð¾Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð±ÐµÐ»Ð¾Ð² Ð² Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ðµ. Ð Ð¿ÐµÑÐ²Ð¾Ð¹ Ð³Ð»Ð°Ð²Ðµ ÑÐ´ÐµÐ»Ð°Ð½Ñ ÑÐ»ÐµÐ´ÑÑÑÐµÐµ Ð²ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð´Ñ: Ð¸Ð½ÑÑÐ¸ÑÑÑ ÑÐ¾Ð»ÐºÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð° Ð¸Ð¼ÐµÐµÑ Ð²ÐµÑÐ¾Ð¼Ð¾Ðµ Ð·Ð½Ð°ÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ðµ Ð² Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð¾Ð¿ÑÐ¸Ð¼ÐµÐ½Ð¸ÑÐµÐ»ÑÐ½Ð¾Ð¼ Ð¿ÑÐ¾ÑÐµÑÑÐµ. ÐÐ¼ÐµÑÑÐµ Ñ ÑÐµÐ¼ Ð¾Ð¿ÑÐµÐ´ÐµÐ»ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ðµ Ð´Ð°Ð½Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ Ð¿Ð¾Ð½ÑÑÐ¸Ñ Ð¾ÑÑÑÑÑÑÐ²ÑÐµÑ Ð² Ð´ÐµÐ¹ÑÑÐ²ÑÑÑÐµÐ¼ Ð·Ð°ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð¾Ð´Ð°ÑÐµÐ»ÑÑÑÐ²Ðµ, ÐºÐ°Ðº Ð¸ Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐ´Ð¾Ðº ÐµÐ³Ð¾ Ð¾ÑÑÑÐµÑÑÐ²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ. Ð ÑÐ²ÑÐ·Ð¸ Ñ Ð¸Ð·Ð»Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð½ÑÐ¼ Ð½Ð° Ð·Ð°ÑÐ¸ÑÑ Ð²ÑÐ½Ð¾ÑÑÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑÐµÐ´Ð»Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¾ Ð½ÐµÐ¾Ð±ÑÐ¾Ð´Ð¸Ð¼Ð¾ÑÑÐ¸ Ð¿ÑÐ¸Ð½ÑÑÐ¸Ñ ÑÐµÐ´ÐµÑÐ°Ð»ÑÐ½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ Ð·Ð°ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð° Â«Ð Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐ´ÐºÐµ Ð¾ÑÐ¸ÑÐ¸Ð°Ð»ÑÐ½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ ÑÐ¾Ð»ÐºÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð½Ð¾ÑÐ¼Ð°ÑÐ¸Ð²Ð½ÑÑ Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð¾Ð²ÑÑ Ð°ÐºÑÐ¾Ð², Ð´ÐµÐ¹ÑÑÐ²ÑÑÑÐ¸Ñ Ð½Ð° ÑÐµÑÑÐ¸ÑÐ¾ÑÐ¸Ð¸ Ð Ð¾ÑÑÐ¸Ð¹ÑÐºÐ¾Ð¹ Ð¤ÐµÐ´ÐµÑÐ°ÑÐ¸Ð¸Â». ÐÑÐ¾ÑÐ°Ñ Ð³Ð»Ð°Ð²Ð° Ð¿Ð¾ÑÐ²ÑÑÐµÐ½Ð° Ð¸ÑÑÐ»ÐµÐ´Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ ÑÐµÐ¼Ðµ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð±ÐµÐ»Ð¾Ð² Ð² Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ðµ. ÐÐ¾ ÑÐµÐ·ÑÐ»ÑÑÐ°ÑÐ°Ð¼ Ð¸ÑÑÐ»ÐµÐ´Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ ÑÑÐ¾ÑÐ¼Ð¸ÑÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ñ Ð¿ÑÐµÐ´Ð»Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿Ð¾ Ð²Ð¾Ð·Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶Ð½Ð¾Ð¼Ñ ÑÐ°ÑÑÐ¸ÑÐ½Ð¾Ð¼Ñ Ð¸ÑÐºÐ»ÑÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð±ÐµÐ»Ð¾Ð² Ð¾Ð±ÑÐµÐºÑÐ¸Ð²Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ ÑÐ°ÑÐ°ÐºÑÐµÑÐ° Ð² Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ðµ Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐµÐ´ÑÑÐ²Ð¾Ð¼ Ð¿ÑÐ¸Ð²Ð»ÐµÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð²ÑÑÑÐ¸Ñ ÑÑÐ´ÐµÐ±Ð½ÑÑ Ð¾ÑÐ³Ð°Ð½Ð¾Ð² Ð² Ð¿ÑÐ¾ÑÐµÑÑÐµ Ð¾Ð±ÑÑÐ¶Ð´ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð·Ð°ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð¾Ð¿ÑÐ¾ÐµÐºÑÐ°.
description: Graduation thesis topic: Â«Structure of interpretation of the right. Basis and permissible limits of existence of gaps in lawÂ». This paper is dedicated to the research of institute of interpretation of law, as well as to the research of such phenomenon as gaps in law. Tasks, that were solved during the research: 1. analysis of objective, subjective prerequisites for the interpretation of law; 2. definition of interpretation of law, consideration of methods and types of interpretation of law; 3. identification of problems in the interpretation of law in modern times; 4. Definition of the gaps in law, analysis of objective and subjective reasons for gaps in law; 5. research of characteristic of legal analogy institutions as ways to bridge gaps in law. The first chapter concludes that the institution of law interpretation is important in the law enforcement process. However, there is no definition of this concept in the current legislation, as well as the procedure for its implementation. In connection with the above, proposals are made on the need to adopt a federal law Â«On interpretation order of normative legal acts in force in the territory of the Russian FederationÂ». The second chapter is dedicated to subject of gaps in law. Based on the results of the research, proposals have been made for the possible partial elimination of gaps of an objective nature in the law by involving the highest judicial authorities in the discussion process of the draft law.