Estimating and comparing greenhouse gas emissions with their uncertainties using different methods: A case study for an energy supply utility
Creators: name: Sangil Lee
name: Yongmoon Choi
name: Jinchun Woo
name: Kang, Woong
name: Jinsang Jung
Publisher: name: Taylor & Francis
Year: 2014
Subjects: subject: Plant Biology
subject: FOS: Biological sciences
subject: FOS: Biological sciences
subject: Mathematics
subject: FOS: Mathematics
subject: FOS: Mathematics
subject: Biological Sciences
subject: Chemistry
subject: Earth and Environmental Sciences
subject: Pharmacology
subject: Engineering

description: Energy supply utilities release significant amounts of greenhouse gases (GHGs) into the atmosphere. It is essential to accurately estimate GHG emissions with their uncertainties, for reducing GHG emissions and mitigating climate change. GHG emissions can be calculated by an activity-based method (i.e., fuel consumption) and continuous emission measurement (CEM). In this study, GHG emissions such as CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, and N<sub>2</sub>O are estimated for a heat generation utility, which uses bituminous coal as fuel, by applying both the activity-based method and CEM. CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by the activity-based method are 12–19% less than that by the CEM, while N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions by the activity-based method are two orders of magnitude and 60% less than those by the CEM, respectively. Comparing GHG emissions (as CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent) from both methods, total GHG emissions by the activity-based methods are 12–27% lower than that by the CEM, as CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions are lower than those by the CEM. Results from uncertainty estimation show that uncertainties in the GHG emissions by the activity-based methods range from 3.4% to about 20%, from 67% to 900%, and from about 70% to about 200% for CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O, and CH<sub>4</sub>, respectively, while uncertainties in the GHG emissions by the CEM range from 4% to 4.5%. For the activity-based methods, an uncertainty in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) default net calorific value (NCV) is the major uncertainty contributor to CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, while an uncertainty in the IPCC default emission factor is the major uncertainty contributor to CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. For the CEM, an uncertainty in volumetric flow measurement, especially for the distribution of the volumetric flow rate in a stack, is the major uncertainty contributor to all GHG emissions, while uncertainties in concentration measurements contribute a little to uncertainties in the GHG emissions. Implications:Energy supply utilities contribute a significant portion of the global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It is important to accurately estimate GHG emissions with their uncertainties for reducing GHG emissions and mitigating climate change. GHG emissions can be estimated by an activity-based method and by continuous emission measurement (CEM), yet little study has been done to calculate GHG emissions with uncertainty analysis. This study estimates GHG emissions and their uncertainties, and also identifies major uncertainty contributors for each method.