title: ÐÑÑÐ¾ÑÐ½Ð¾Ðµ Ð·Ð´Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ðµ Ð±Ð¸Ð·Ð½ÐµÑ-ÑÐµÐ½ÑÑÐ° Ð² ÑÐµÐ¹ÑÐ¼Ð¸ÑÐµÑÐºÐ¸ Ð°ÐºÑÐ¸Ð²Ð½Ð¾Ð¼ ÑÐ°Ð¹Ð¾Ð½Ðµ
title: Ð²ÑÐ¿ÑÑÐºÐ½Ð°Ñ ÐºÐ²Ð°Ð»Ð¸ÑÐ¸ÐºÐ°ÑÐ¸Ð¾Ð½Ð½Ð°Ñ ÑÐ°Ð±Ð¾ÑÐ° ÑÐ¿ÐµÑÐ¸Ð°Ð»Ð¸ÑÑÐ°
titleType: Subtitle
title: High-rise building of a business center in a seismically active area
Creators: name: Ð¤Ð¸Ð»Ð°ÑÐ¾Ð²Ð°, ÐÐ°ÑÐ¸Ñ
Publisher: name: Ð¡Ð°Ð½ÐºÑ-ÐÐµÑÐµÑÐ±ÑÑÐ³ÑÐºÐ¸Ð¹ Ð¿Ð¾Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÑÐ½Ð¸ÑÐµÑÐºÐ¸Ð¹ ÑÐ½Ð¸Ð²ÐµÑÑÐ¸ÑÐµÑ ÐÐµÑÑÐ° ÐÐµÐ»Ð¸ÐºÐ¾Ð³Ð¾
Year: 2023
Subjects: Ð²ÑÑÐ¾ÑÐ½Ð¾Ðµ Ð·Ð´Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ðµ
ÑÐµÐ¹ÑÐ¼Ð¾Ð³Ð°ÑÐ¸ÑÐµÐ»Ð¸
ÑÐµÐ¹ÑÐ¼Ð¾Ð¸Ð·Ð¾Ð»ÑÑÐ¸Ñ
high-rise building
earthquake dampers
seismic isolation

description: Ð¢ÐµÐ¼Ð° Ð²ÑÐ¿ÑÑÐºÐ½Ð¾Ð¹ ÐºÐ²Ð°Ð»Ð¸ÑÐ¸ÐºÐ°ÑÐ¸Ð¾Ð½Ð½Ð¾Ð¹ ÑÐ°Ð±Ð¾ÑÑ: Â«ÐÑÑÐ¾ÑÐ½Ð¾Ðµ Ð·Ð´Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ðµ Ð±Ð¸Ð·Ð½ÐµÑ-ÑÐµÐ½ÑÑÐ° Ð² ÑÐµÐ¹ÑÐ¼Ð¸ÑÐµÑÐºÐ¸ Ð°ÐºÑÐ¸Ð²Ð½Ð¾Ð¼ ÑÐ°Ð¹Ð¾Ð½ÐµÂ». ÐÐ´ÑÐµÑ Ð¿ÑÐ¾ÐµÐºÑÐ¸ÑÑÐµÐ¼Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ Ð·Ð´Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ: ÐÑÐ°ÑÐ½Ð¾Ð´Ð°ÑÑÐºÐ¸Ð¹ ÐºÑÐ°Ð¹, Ð³. Ð¡Ð¾ÑÐ¸ ÑÐ». ÐÐ¾Ð»ÐµÐ½ÐµÐ²Ð°, ÑÑ.3. Ð¦ÐµÐ»ÑÑ Ð¸ÑÑÐ»ÐµÐ´Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ ÑÐ²Ð»ÑÐµÑÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾Ð´Ð±Ð¾Ñ Ð¾Ð¿ÑÐ¸Ð¼Ð°Ð»ÑÐ½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ ÐºÐ¾Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÑÑÐ²Ð° ÑÐµÐ¹ÑÐ¼Ð¾Ð³Ð°ÑÐ¸ÑÐµÐ»ÐµÐ¹. Ð£ÑÑÐ°Ð½Ð¾Ð²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð¾, ÑÑÐ¾ Ð¾Ð¿ÑÐ¸Ð¼Ð°Ð»ÑÐ½ÑÐ¼ Ð²Ð°ÑÐ¸Ð°Ð½ÑÐ¾Ð¼ ÑÐµÐ¹ÑÐ¼Ð¾Ð·Ð°ÑÐ¸ÑÑ Ð²ÑÑÐ¾ÑÐ½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ Ð·Ð´Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ ÑÐ²Ð»ÑÐµÑÑÑ ÑÐ¸ÑÑÐµÐ¼Ð° ÑÐµÐ·Ð¸Ð½Ð¾Ð¼ÐµÑÐ°Ð»Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÑÐºÐ¸Ñ, ÑÐ°ÑÐ¿Ð¾Ð»Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð½ÑÑ Ð¼ÐµÐ¶Ð´Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð»Ð¾Ð½Ð½Ð°Ð¼Ð¸ Ð¿Ð¾Ð´Ð·ÐµÐ¼Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ ÑÑÐ°Ð¶Ð° Ð¸ Ð¿ÐµÑÐµÐºÑÑÑÐ¸ÐµÐ¼ Ð½Ð°Ð´ Ð½Ð¸Ð¼. Ð ÑÐ»ÑÑÐ°Ðµ Ð¿ÑÐ¸Ð¼ÐµÐ½ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð´Ð°Ð½Ð½Ð¾Ð¹ ÑÐ¸ÑÑÐµÐ¼Ñ ÑÐ¾ÐºÑÐ°ÑÐ°ÑÑÑÑ Ð¼Ð°ÐºÑÐ¸Ð¼Ð°Ð»ÑÐ½ÑÐµ Ð¿ÐµÑÐµÐ¼ÐµÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð½ÑÑÑÑÐºÑÐ¸Ð¸ Ð¿Ð¾ Ð¾ÑÐ¸ OX Ð² 14 ÑÐ°Ð· (Ñ 272 Ð¼Ð¼ Ð´Ð¾ 19,5 Ð¼Ð¼), Ð¿Ð¾ Ð¾ÑÐ¸ OY Ð² 24 ÑÐ°Ð·Ð° (Ñ 276 Ð¼Ð¼ Ð´Ð¾ 11,5 Ð¼Ð¼). ÐÐ°Ð½Ð½ÑÐ¹ ÑÐ¿Ð¾ÑÐ¾Ð± ÑÐ²Ð»ÑÐµÑÑÑ Ð±Ð¾Ð»ÐµÐµ Ð½Ð°Ð´ÐµÐ¶Ð½ÑÐ¼, ÑÐµÐ¼ ÑÑÐ°Ð´Ð¸ÑÐ¸Ð¾Ð½Ð½Ð°Ñ ÑÐµÐ¹ÑÐ¼Ð¾Ð·Ð°ÑÐ¸ÑÐ° Ð¸ Ð·Ð½Ð°ÑÐ¸ÑÐµÐ»ÑÐ½Ð¾ ÑÐ¼ÐµÐ½ÑÑÐ°ÐµÑ Ð²ÐµÑ Ð·Ð´Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ, Ð¿Ð¾ ÑÑÐ°Ð²Ð½ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ñ Ð¼ÐµÑÐ¾Ð´Ð¾Ð¼ ÑÐ²ÐµÐ»Ð¸ÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ ÑÐµÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ð¹ Ð½ÐµÑÑÑÐ¸Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð½ÑÑÑÑÐºÑÐ¸Ð¹, Ð° ÑÐ°Ð·Ð½Ð¸ÑÐ° Ð² ÑÐµÐ½Ðµ Ð¼Ð¾Ð½ÑÐ°Ð¶Ð° Ð¾Ð±ÑÐµÐºÑÐ° Ð½Ðµ Ð¿ÑÐµÐ²ÑÑÐ°ÐµÑ 10%, ÑÑÐ¾ ÑÐ²Ð»ÑÐµÑÑÑ Ð±Ð¾Ð»ÐµÐµ Ð²ÑÐ³Ð¾Ð´Ð½ÑÐ¼. Ð ÑÐ°Ð±Ð¾ÑÐµ Ð¸ÑÐ¿Ð¾Ð»ÑÐ·Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¾ ÑÐ»ÐµÐ´ÑÑÑÐµÐµ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð³ÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¼Ð½Ð¾Ðµ Ð¾Ð±ÐµÑÐ¿ÐµÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ðµ: MS Office, Autodesk Revit 2021, Autodesk Autokad 2021, ÐÐ¸ÑÐ° Ð¡ÐÐÐ  2021, Ð¡Ð°Ð¿ÑÐ¸Ñ 3D 2021, ÐÐ Ð¡Ð¸Ð³Ð¼Ð° ÐÐ, Navisworks Manage 2021.
description: The topic of the final qualifying work: "A high-rise building of a business center in a seismically active area". The address of the projected building: Krasnodar Territory, Sochi, Goleneva str., plot 3. The aim of the study is to select the optimal number of earthquake dampers. It is established that the best option for seismic protection of a high-rise building is a system of rubber-metal ones located between the columns of the underground floor and the ceiling above it. In the case of using this system, the maximum displacement of the structure along the OX axis is reduced by 14 times (from 272 mm to 19.5 mm), along the OY axis by 24 times (from 276 mm to 11.5 mm). This method is more reliable than traditional seismic protection and significantly reduces the weight of the building, compared with the method of increasing the cross-sections of loadbearing structures, and the difference in the price of installation of the object does not exceed 10%, which is more profitable. The following software was used in the work: MS Office, Autodesk Revit 2021, Autodesk Autokad 2021, Lira CAD 2021, Sapphire 3D 2021, Sigma PB software, Navisworks Manage 2021.