Spiniphilus Lin & Bi, 2011, gen. nov.
Creators: name: Lin, Meiying
name: Bi, Wenxuan
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2011
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Cerambycidae
Spiniphilus

description: Spiniphilus gen. nov.
Type species: Spiniphilus spinicornis sp. nov.
Diagnosis. Differs from other genera of the Philinae by the spined male antennae (distal flagellum is strongly serrate also in Philus rufescens Pascoe). It also differs from Heterophilus, Philus (except for “ Philus ” globulicollis Thomson, see Švácha, et. al, 1997: 365–366) and Doesus by the plesiomorphic 2/2/2 (instead of 1/2/2) tibial spur formula. From Mantitheus and “ Philus ” globulicollis (sharing the 2/2/2 formula), it differs by the carinate lateral pronotal margins, and from the former also by the fully winged females and hind wings with very complete plesiomorphic venation.
Description. Head subvertical in front, slightly elongated and narrowed behind eyes; mandibles rather long, with sharp apex, crossed when closed; maxillae (Fig. 3 b) relatively reduced, palps long and with dense setae, foursegmented, the third segment shortest, terminal segment with apex truncated; galea with long setae, lacinia reduced; eyes large, emarginated, prominent, lower lobes anteriorly approaching genal margins. Antennae longer (male) or shorter (female) than the body, flagellomeres flattened, flagellomeres I to VIII prominently angulate lateroapically in females (making flagellum weakly serrate), in males the lateroapical angle produced into a long flattened spine (making flagellum pectinate); scape stout, shorter than other antennomeres except pedicel; last antennomere longest; third shorter (male) or longer (female) than fourth; fourth slightly shorter than (male) or subequal to (female) fifth. Prothorax with lateral margin in the form of a carina extending from base nearly to apex, curved downward to (but always retaining some distance from) outer angles of the procoxal cavities; latter cavities widely open posteriorly, intercoxal process broad, with broadened apex. Mesonotum widely and deeply emarginated anteriorly, with a median line, stridulatory plate absent. Elytra broader than prothorax, about three times as long as the maximum width near base, gradually narrower apically, and rounded at apex. Hind wings have a very complete plesiomorphic venation similar to that of Philus; females with normal elytra and wings. Legs rather long, fringed with hairs and pubescence; pro- and mesotibiae with short dents or teeth (shorter than surrounding pubescence) on outer side; tibial spur formula 2/2/2; tarsi with the third joints cleft, first joint shorter than the second and third combined. Fore coxae prominent, strongly transverse.
Etymology. The generic name is composed of spini- (referring to the spined male antennae) and Philus (the type genus of the subfamily Philinae). Gender masculine.
Distribution. That of the type species.
Spiniphilus spinicornis sp. nov. (Figs 1–12)
Description (based on three males and one female): Male: length: 22.8–26.0 mm, humeral width: 5.8–6.8 mm. Female: length: 37.0 mm, humeral width: 9.0 mm. Body uniformly reddish testaceous, covered with quite long tawny pubescence. Head narrower than prothorax, completely covered with long pubescence. Eyes protuberant, much more protruding than temples, upper eyelobes closer to each other than lower eyelobes (Fig. 3 a). Male (Figs 1 a–1b) antennae about one-fifth longer than body, with last two segments surpassing the elytral apex, with antennomeres III-X flattened and bearing a long lateroapical spine; scape stout, without a carina, last antennomere flat and long; relative lengths of segments from base to apex: 12 3 25 32 33 35 36 35 40 38 69. Female (Figs 2 a–2b) antennae about two-thirds of body length, antennomeres III-X flattened and sharply angulate lateroapically; scape expanded, without a carina, last antennomere flat and long; relative lengths of segments from base to apex: 17 6 30 26 26 25 25 22 22 21 27. Prothorax tapering anteriorly, very finely punctured, with a lateral marginal carina running from base to about apical 1/5 (Fig. 4), anteriorly approaching but not touching procoxal cavity. Elytra densely punctured, much broader than prothorax and three times as long as humeral width; gradually tapering apically, without any carina; apex narrowly rounded. Hind wings (Figs 11–12) have a very complete plesiomorphic venation, medial field with five free veins and a large wedge cell, crossvein r4 without spur. Legs moderately flattened, with dense pubescence; hind femur reaching to second (female) or third (male) abdominal segment; first hind tarsal segment shorter than following two segments combined; apical margin of second tarsomere shallowly emarginate (to 1/10 to 1/5), third tarsomere deeply cleft to 2/3; male and female claws simple. Male terminalia (Figs 5–7): Tegmen length about 3.1 mm; lateral lobes slender, tapering apically, each about 0.6 mm long and 0.15 mm wide, apical half with setae shorter than lateral lobes; tegmen without roof, membranous dorsally; ring converging; median lobe plus median struts slightly curved in apical half, longer than tegmen (about 4 3); median struts about 5/8 of median lobe’s length; dorsal plate slightly shorter than ventral plate; apex of ventral plate strongly projecting; median foramen not elongated; internal sac without any armature, not distinctly delimited from ejaculatory duct. Tergite VIII (Figs 5 a–5b) slightly broader than long, apex rounded. Female terminalia (Figs 8– 10): Paraproct long, baculum quite thick; coxite baculi very thick, about one half of the length of paraproct baculi; coxite lobes short, sclerotized except for basal and apical portions, with tactile hairs at the apices (Figs 9–10); stylus apical in position, moderate in size, sclerotized except for apex which bears tactile hairs (Fig. 10); dorsal baculi short and thick; proctiger extremely long, with two pairs of thin baculi, inner pair very long, much longer than paraproct baculi, outer pair less than one third of inner pair’s length. Tignum shorter than abdomen.
Diagnosis. That of the genus.
Etymology. The species is named after the spined third to tenth antennomeres in the male.
Remarks. Though the only available female was unfortunately damaged by dermestid beetles, it could be concluded that the vaginal plates were absent, bursa copulatrix absent and spermatheca not forming a sclerotized capsule, but present as a large membranous pouch, not clearly distinguished from spermathecal duct (using the interpretation of Saito, 1990).
The biology of the species is unknown, the available specimens were attracted to a light trap. However, the mouthparts suggest that the adults probably do not feed, like the adults of Philus.
Based on our observation on the material in IZAS, we hereby confirm the tibial spur formula of Heterophilus (not hitherto mentioned in any published description) to be 1/2/ 2 in both male and the undescribed brachypterous female.
Distribution. China: Yunnan.
Material examined. Holotype (26.0 mm long), male, China, Yunnan prov., Yingjiang (24°46ʹN, 97°58ʹE), 1700 m, 1980. IV.15, leg. Ping Gao (IZAS). Paratypes: 1 female (37.0 mm long), same data as holotype but 1980. IV.21; 2 males, Yunnan prov., Tengchong county, Longchuanjiang (24°55ʹN, 98°42ʹE), alt. 1050 m, 2006. V.16, leg. Ping Zhao by light trap (IZAS & CCCC).
description: Published as part of Lin, Meiying & Bi, Wenxuan, 2011, A new genus and species of the subfamily Philinae (Coleoptera: Vesperidae), pp. 54-60 in Zootaxa 2777 on pages 54-57, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.276934