Mioscarta Breddin 1901
Creators: name: Crispolon, Elorde Jr. S.
name: Guilbert, Eric
name: Yap, Sheryl A.
name: Soulier-Perkins, Adeline
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hemiptera
Cercopidae
Mioscarta

description: Genus Mioscarta Breddin, 1901
Mioscarta Breddin, 1901: 123 (new genus), 183 (Zoogeography).
Type species
Mioscarta forcipata Breddin, 1901.
Diagnosis
The genus can be identified by the following combination of characters:
Habitus general shape dorso-ventrally flattened, in lateral view total length nearly 4 times height (Figs 2, 4–11A). Pronotum angle not more than 25° (Figs 2, 4–11A). Distance between ocellus and compound eye 2 times ocellus diameter (Fig. 1A). Ocelli large, distance between eyes less than 8 times ocellus diameter (Fig. 1A). Apical reticulation of the tegmen generally developed and reduced in few cases (Figs 4–11A–C). Widest part of postclypeus in frontal view is at midheight (Fig. 1A). Apical curve of tegmen visible in dorsal view (Figs 4–11C). Widest part of habitus in dorsal view at midlength of tegmen (Figs 4–11C). Male subgenital plates is at least 1.5 times longer than pygofer height. Male subgenital plates appendage always present, longer than main plate (Figs 5, 7–8, 10–11F).
Among the Rhinaulacini, Mioscarta closely resembles Trigonoschema Crispolon & Soulier-Perkins gen. nov. with respect to the distance between ocelli, postclypeus shape in frontal view, postclypeus longitudinal groove, apical cells of the tegmen, Rp posterior wing, absence of r-m crossvein, and presence of sterno-lateral plate between subgenital plate and pygofer while Peociloterpa with respect to postclypeus longitudinal groove, absence of r-m crossvein, presence of sterno-lateral plate between subgenital plate and pygofer and paramere general shape, but they differ by the following characters presented in Table 2 below.
Distribution
India, Indonesia (Borneo, Flores and Sulawesi), Malaysia (Borneo), and Philippines.
Key to the species of Philippine Mioscarta Breddin, 1901
1. Tegmen containing red coloration (Figs 4–6, 10) ............................................................................. 2
– Tegmen without red coloration (Figs 7–9, 11) ................................................................................. 5
2. Basal third of tegmen yellowish (Figs 4, 10) .................................................................................... 3
– Basal third of tegmen brown or reddish (Figs 5–6) .......................................................................... 4
3. Narrow brown transverse band following basal third then tegmen getting darker and redder toward apex (Fig. 10) ............................................................................................... M. semperi Jacobi, 1905
– No narrow transverse band but a brown patch within basal area, a large reddish band underlines costal and apical margins (Fig. 4) ............................................................... M. basilana Jacobi, 1927
4. Basal third of tegmen reddish, rest of the tegmen darker brown with red underlining veins (Fig. 5) ................................................................................................ M. ferruginea (Walker, 1851)
– Tegmen with basal third brown getting lighter in second third and slightly darker in last apical third with red underlying veins (Fig. 6) ................................................................ M. lutea Schmidt, 1925
5. Tegmen coloration containing some black (Figs 8–9) ...................................................................... 6
– Tegmen coloration from yellowish to brown only (Figs 7, 11) ........................................................ 7
6. Tegmen entirely black except for the very orange base (Figs 8–9) M. obscuripennis Schmidt, 1920
– Tegmen basally yellowish brown and apically black ........................... M. flavobasalis Jacobi, 1927
7. Tegmen brownish and opaque, darker toward apex, pronotum brownish (Fig. 7) ............................. ................................................................................ M. nubisa Crispolon & Soulier-Perkins sp. nov.
– Tegmen yellow with some brown and translucent parts, pronotum yellowish with darker irregular patch in middle (Fig. 11) .................................................... M. translucida Crispolon & Yap sp. nov.
description: Published as part of Crispolon, Elorde Jr. S., Guilbert, Eric, Yap, Sheryl A. & Soulier-Perkins, Adeline, 2021, New genus and new species of spittlebugs (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) from the Philippines, pp. 90-135 in European Journal of Taxonomy 778 on pages 98-99, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2021.778.1571, http://zenodo.org/record/5704978