<b>Intelligent Deciphering Physics</b>
Creators: name: huang, chunke
Publisher: name: figshare
Year: 2024
Subjects: classificationCode: 519999
subject: Other physical sciences not elsewhere classified

description: <b>Intelligent Deciphering Physics </b>is an intelligent interpretation technique that utilizes the analysis of human intellectual characteristics to interpret theories and experiments in the field of physics.<br>The universe is a complex phenomenon in itself, simultaneously undergoing quantum processes, physical processes, chemical processes, biochemical processes, social processes, and other unknown processes.<br><br>In terms of human cognition, there are four information coupling links that establish the representation of objective reality in the consciousness landscape of the human brain:Coupling 1: Radiation representing objective phenomena, mainly sound radiation and light radiation. For phenomena that do not radiate, such as black holes, we cannot generate conscious content.Coupling 2: Neural information conversion representing radiation, mainly visual and auditory conversion. The conversion rate in this coupling link is generally below 5%, meaning that about 95% of the objective representation cannot be perceived.Coupling 3: Cultivation of dimensions for analyzing the consciousness landscape, distinguishing the content of neural information. This requires information changes in corresponding dimensions. Note that these information changes cannot be fixed in a characteristic cycle; stable information will act as a background noise, preventing the discernment function of the consciousness landscape. For example, if everything appears white, it will overshadow the fixation eye movement mechanism of the visual center, leading to the disruption of central mechanisms.Coupling 4: Language expression of the consciousness landscape. This is the link where information loss is most severe. Psychologist Albert Mehrabian proposed the 7-38-55 rule, suggesting that in our daily communication, language accounts for only 7% of the conveyed information, while tone of voice accounts for 38% and body language and emotions account for 55%. Only language has the opportunity to be recorded and potentially have an impact on human social activities.So, which type of expression is closest to the consciousness landscape? It is concise and abstract generalization.The systematization of words is not something an ordinary person can accomplish; it requires a vast vocabulary and extensive memory, a capability only possessed by individuals with exceptional memory.The consciousness landscape of individuals with exceptional memory is a simplified graphical representation, which can naturally be depicted and form an image-based textual representation system.Due to the broad and concise nature of their consciousness analysis dimensions, their understanding of the world is also simplistic and straightforward.Although the memory capacity of individuals with exceptional memory is incredible, fortunately, ordinary people can still understand through careful analysis.<br>However, the other extreme of central cultivation, the cognition landscape of extraordinary dimensions, is difficult for ordinary people to comprehend.In the field of psychology, many dimensions of consciousness centers that ordinary people cannot perceive have been discovered. Therefore, I believe that a significant portion of auditory and visual hallucinations are simply due to the lack of central discernment abilities in ordinary people for the corresponding dimensions, resulting in a gap in understanding.Therefore, the consciousness analysis dimensions that exceed ordinary people's abilities are often difficult for them to comprehend.<br>We have never believed that different disciplines in physics can independently exist without compatibility.In other words, microphysics and macrophysics cannot have mutually exclusive theories. According to my perspective, physics, chemistry, biology, humanities, and other disciplines are all used to explain the same objective phenomenon. All theories need to complete a comprehensive explanation of the same objective phenomenon, without contradictions.<br>The field of physics is the starting point for the study of objective phenomena, but it has reached its limit in the face of Einstein's proposal of the grand unified theory.The problem lies in photons. The viewpoint Einstein left me with was, "All the fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no closer to answer the question, 'What are light quanta?' Of course today every rascal thinks he knows the answer, but he is deluding himself."This sentence acknowledges that the theory of light quanta cannot explain the phenomenon of wave-particle duality, which we often refer to today. However, the statement does not refer to the representation of light, but rather to its properties. It is not entirely incorrect, but using wave-particle duality to prove a physical principle can lead to errors. Some people choose to believe that light is a particle or a wave to prove themselves correct, which is absurd.