Hibiscus (sect. Lilibiscus) Hochr.
Creators: name: Thomson, Lex A. J.
name: Cheek, Martin
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2020
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Plantae
Tracheophyta
Magnoliopsida
Malvales
Malvaceae
Hibiscus

description: Sect. <b>Lilibiscus</b> <i>Hochr.</i> <i>Shrubs</i>, sometimes scandent, or small trees, usually with unlobed, ovate, glossy leaves. <i>Flowers</i> single, axillary, usually with an articulated peduncle. Involucre (epicalyx) of 5 – 10, more or less linear or narrowly triangular bracts, usually shorter than the calyx and never fused with each other or with the calyx. Calyx united into a tube, lobes shorter than tube. Involucre and calyx glabrous or only slightly tomentose with stellate and simple hairs. Corolla large and bright, the petals reflexed at anthesis leaving the staminal column conspicuously exserted. <i>Fruit</i> capsular, usually obovoid and glabrous or scabrous, but never woolly. <i>Seeds</i> smooth, verrucate, or hairy. Section <i>Lilibiscus</i>, comprising 23 species (several of which have previously been treated as subspecies), is restricted mainly to islands in the Indian and Pacific Oceans. It is monophyletic and sister to Sect. <i>Hibiscus</i> according to Pfeil <i>et al.</i> (2002) although with poor sampling. According to Thomson &amp; Braglia (2019), nine species are known from Hawaii, those with predominantly white flowers being <i>H. waimeae</i> A.Heller, <i>H. hannerae</i> O.Deg. &amp; I.Deg., <i>H. arnottianus</i> A.Gray, <i>H. immaculatus</i> Roe, <i>H. punaluuensis</i> Skotsb. and those with orange or red flowers being <i>H. kokio</i> Hillebr. ex Wawra, <i>H. kahili</i> C.N.Forbes, <i>H. saintjohnianus</i> Roe, <i>H. clayii</i> O.Deg. &amp; I.Deg. Four species have been recorded from Fiji: <i>H. storckii</i> Seem., <i>H. bennettii</i>, <i>H. bragliae</i> L.A.J.Thomson, <i>H. macverryi</i> L.A.J.Thomson &amp; Braglia (Thomson &amp; Braglia 2019). <i>Hibiscus cooperi</i> Hort. has recently been confirmed growing in its native state in the interior of Erromango, Vanuatu (Joe James Rungu, pers. comm.). In the Indian Ocean, four species (<i>Hibiscus boryanus</i> DC., <i>H. fragilis</i> DC., <i>H. genevii</i> Bojer ex Hook., <i>H. liliflorus</i> Cav.) are known from the Mascarene Islands and from Madagascar five species (<i>H. bernieri</i> Baill., <i>H. grandidieri</i> Baill., <i>H. phanerandus</i> Baker, <i>H. perrieri</i> Hochr., <i>H. liliastrum</i> Hochr.), while <i>H. schizopetalus</i> and <i>H. hareyae,</i> described in this paper, are restricted to the Indian Ocean coast of E Africa. Two taxa, <i>H. rosa-sinensis</i> and <i>H. denisonii</i> Hort. are only known from horticulture. Plants of section <i>Lilibiscus</i>, especially <i>H. rosa-sinensis</i> and its hybrids are the most commonly cultivated ornamentals of the genus. Taxonomic Treatment The lectotype of <i>Hibicus schizopetalus</i> (Dyer) Hook. f. is <i>Kirk</i> s.n. (K!, chosen by Cheek (1989)) from Kenya, Mombasa District. This specimen (Kew barcode K 00240991, lectotype) was a mixed collection, with a different element subsequently barcoded K 000240492 on the same sheet. Furthermore, the area on the sheet coded K 000240492 includes specimens which are a mixture of <i>H. schizopetalus</i> and <i>H. hareyae</i> sp. nov. The only material of <i>H. hareyae</i> on this sheet is the short leafless stalk with a single flower on a short peduncle at the top right of the specimen sheet. The handwritten location ‘Kilwa’ in the hand of Daniel Oliver, Keeper of the Kew Herbarium, appears misplaced on the sheet and ought to have been pointing to the floral fragment of <i>H. hareyae</i> in the top right corner, rather than to the undoubted specimen of <i>H. schizopetalus</i>. <i>Hibiscus hareyae</i> although superficially similar to <i>H. schizopetalus,</i> is a distinctive and well-marked species. Whilst <i>H. hareyae</i> is closely related to, and shares many features including two distinctive floral traits with, <i>H. schizopetalus</i> — laciniate petals and pendant flowers — it differs in other taxonomically significant floral and foliar morphological characters (Table 1). These differences with <i>H. schizopetalus</i> indicate that it warrants species-level recognition. The absence of an articulated floral stalk is unique in sect. <i>Lilibiscus</i>. The two species have an allopatric distribution with the nearest populations separated by a distance of about 400 km. Examination of specimens of <i>H. hareyae</i> from northern Tanzania indicated no evidence of morphological intermediates or gene exchange between populations of the two species. The name <i>Hibiscus schizopetalus</i> is globally associated with plants of the Kenyan and northern Tanzanian species: this species is now widely planted throughout the tropics and subtropics, and also as a glasshouse/ indoor plant in cooler climates. Planted in gardens as an ornamental it can often persist and become locally naturalised. Naturalised populations deduced from this source were observed in Cameroon in 2007 and Guinea in 2012 (Cheek pers. obs). On the Tropicos website of herbarium specimens of wild plants, of the 38 listed of <i>Hibiscus schizopetalus,</i> 28 are from Central and South America where the species is definitely not native, as is the case also for the records from Gabon and Mozambique (Tropicos. org 2020). We consider that most of the few specimens of <i>H. schizopetalus</i> from central-eastern Tanzania are likely to be naturalised or old plantings of <i>H. schizopetalus</i>, on this basis. For example the label of one specimen of <i>H. schizopetalus</i> from central Tanzania (<i>H. Breyne</i> 5562, BR 0000019387017) collected along the Dar es Salam – Morogoro road states that it was introduced and naturalised in gallery forest. Cheek’ s (1989) rationale for choice of lectotype is sound and fortuitously minimises any disruption with continuing the existing use of the name <i>Hibiscus schizopetalus.</i> Materials and Methods The new species was first discovered by the first author by examining online images of herbarium specimens including the Kew Herbarium catalogue (continuously updated), and examining them for morphological disjunctions. Gross morphological measurements were initially made from these images. Finally, herbarium material at K was examined with a Leica Wild M 8 dissecting binocular microscope fitted with an eyepiece graticule measuring in units of 0.025 mm at maximum magnification. The drawing was made with the same equipment with a Leica 308700 camera lucida attachment. Specimens or their high resolution images were inspected from the following herbaria: BM, DSM, EA, FTG, K, MO and P. Names of species and authors follow IPNI (continuously updated). The format of the description follows those in other papers describing new taxa of <i>Hibiscus</i> Sect. <i>Lilibiscus</i> e.g. Thomson &amp; Braglia (2019), Cafferty &amp; Cheek (1996), Cheek <i>et al.</i> (1998). Technical terms follow Beentje &amp; Cheek (2003). Specimens cited which have been seen are indicated “!”. The conservation assessment follows the IUCN (2012) categories and criteria. Herbarium codes follow <i>Index Herbariorum</i> (Thiers, continuously updated). The map was made using simplemappr software (https://www.simplemappr.net/). New Species
description: Published as part of <i>Thomson, Lex A. J. &amp; Cheek, Martin, 2020, Discovered online: Hibiscus hareyae sp. nov. of sect. Lilibiscus (Malvaceae), threatened in coastal thicket at Lindi, Tanzania, pp. 3250-3252 in Kew Bulletin 75 (4)</i> on pages 2-3, DOI: 10.1007/s12225-020-09911-6, http://zenodo.org/record/4455823
description: {"references": ["Pfeil, B. E., BruBak, C. L., Craven, L. A. &amp; Crisp, M. D. (2002). Phylogeny of Hibiscus and the tribe Hibisceae (Malvaceae) using chloroplast DNA sequences of ndhF and the rpl 16 intron. Syst. Bot. 27: 333 - 350.", "Thomson, L. A. J. &amp; Braglia, L. (2019). Review of Fiji Hibiscus (Malvaceae-Malvoideae) Species in Section Lilibiscus. Pacific Sci. 73: 79 - 121.", "Cheek, M. (1989). Lectotypification and authorship of Hibiscus schizopetalus (Malvaceae). Taxon 38: 261 - 263.", "Tropicos. org. (2020). Missouri Botanical Garden. Published on the internet; http: // www. tropicos. org (Accessed 27 June 2020).", "Cafferty, S. &amp; Cheek, M. (1996). Hibiscus fragilis. Curtis' s Bot. Mag. 13210 - 214, fig. 306.", "____, Cafferty, S. &amp; Staniforth, M. (1998). Hibiscus kokio subsp. saintjohnianus. Curtis' s Bot. Mag. t. 352, pp. 236 - 241.", "Beentje H. &amp; Cheek, M. (2003). Glossary. In H. J. Beentje, (ed.), Flora of Tropical East Africa. Balkema, Lisse.", "IUCN (2012). IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. IUCN, Gland and Cambridge."]}