cometadata/datacite-rtg-text-other-reclassification-records huggingface dataset:
Megistophylla pentaphylla Arrow 1925
Creators: name: Li, Chun-Lin
name: Yang, Ping-Shih
name: Wang, Chuan-Chan
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2016
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Melolonthidae
Megistophylla
Megistophylla pentaphylla

description: 8. Megistophylla pentaphylla Arrow, 1925
Megistophylla pentaphylla Arrow, 1925: 217. Original combination. Arrow 1938: 278 (key); Arrow 1941: 8 (key).
Distribution. Eastern Myanmar (type locality: Loimwe, 5600 feet, S Shan States).
description: Published as part of Li, Chun-Lin, Yang, Ping-Shih & Wang, Chuan-Chan, 2016, Two new species of Megistophylla Burmeister (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae) from Taiwan, with notes on the genus, pp. 240-250 in Zootaxa 4126 (2) on page 243, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4126.2.4, http://zenodo.org/record/258598
Megistophylla punctata Arrow 1938
Creators: name: Li, Chun-Lin
name: Yang, Ping-Shih
name: Wang, Chuan-Chan
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2016
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Melolonthidae
Megistophylla
Megistophylla punctata

description: 10. Megistophylla punctata Arrow, 1938
Megistophylla punctata Arrow, 1938: 276. Original combination. Arrow 1941: 8 (key).
Distribution. Malay Peninsula (type locality: Selangor, Bukit Kutu, 3000 feet; Pahang, Fraser‘s Hill, 4000 feet).
description: Published as part of Li, Chun-Lin, Yang, Ping-Shih & Wang, Chuan-Chan, 2016, Two new species of Megistophylla Burmeister (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae) from Taiwan, with notes on the genus, pp. 240-250 in Zootaxa 4126 (2) on page 243, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4126.2.4, http://zenodo.org/record/258598
Megistophylla sumatrana Moser 1913
Creators: name: Li, Chun-Lin
name: Yang, Ping-Shih
name: Wang, Chuan-Chan
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2016
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Melolonthidae
Megistophylla
Megistophylla sumatrana

description: 11. Megistophylla sumatrana Moser, 1913
Megistophylla sumatrana Moser, 1913b: 293. Original combination. Arrow 1938: 278 (key); Arrow 1941: 7 (key).
Distribution. Indonesia, Sumatra (type locality: Medan).
description: Published as part of Li, Chun-Lin, Yang, Ping-Shih & Wang, Chuan-Chan, 2016, Two new species of Megistophylla Burmeister (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae) from Taiwan, with notes on the genus, pp. 240-250 in Zootaxa 4126 (2) on page 244, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4126.2.4, http://zenodo.org/record/258598
Megistophylla xitoui Li & Wang, new species
Creators: name: Li, Chun-Lin
name: Yang, Ping-Shih
name: Wang, Chuan-Chan
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2016
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Melolonthidae
Megistophylla
Megistophylla xitoui

description: 12. Megistophylla xitoui Li & Wang, new species
Distribution. Central Taiwan (type locality: Xitou, Nantou).
description: Published as part of Li, Chun-Lin, Yang, Ping-Shih & Wang, Chuan-Chan, 2016, Two new species of Megistophylla Burmeister (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae) from Taiwan, with notes on the genus, pp. 240-250 in Zootaxa 4126 (2) on page 244, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4126.2.4, http://zenodo.org/record/258598
Chionanthus hainanensis B. M. Miao
Creators: name: Quang, Bui Hong
name: Nuraliev, Maxim S.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Plantae
Tracheophyta
Magnoliopsida
Lamiales
Oleaceae
Chionanthus
Chionanthus hainanensis

description: 1. Chionanthus hainanensis (Merr. & Chun) B.M.Miao
in Miao & Chang (1987: 18). ≡ Linociera hainanensis Merrill & Chun (1940: 168, Pl. 25). Chia (1955: 350, Fig. 12), Miao (1992: 113, Fig, 1, 2), Ho (2003: 884, Fig. 7559), Ly (2003: 1168).
TYPE: — CHINA. Hainan: Yaichow, between Lo-Pung and Sam-Ya, in forests, 18 July 1933, F.C. How 71061 (holotype: A: 00046861 photo!; isotypes: E: E00284872 photo!; IBSC: 0002808, 0651357 photo!; K: K000978715 photo!). (Fig. 1)
Images of holotype and isotypes available at
https://s3.amazonaws.com/huhwebimages/AA35DDC7 E43240 C/ type /full/46861.jpg
http://data.rbge.org.uk/herb/E00284872
https://www.cvh.ac.cn/spms/detail.php?id=c7bf434d
http://www.kew.org/herbcatimg/592259.jpg
= Linociera ramiflora f. caudatifolia Chia (1955: 352). TYPE: — CHINA. Hainan: Kan-en District, near Sam Mo Watt village, Chim Fung Ling, steep slope, forest on clay, S.K. Lau 3682 (lectotype, designated here: A: 00056517 photo!; isolectotypes: IBSC: 0651351 photo!; S: S09-35895 photo!).
Literature: — Chang et al. (1996: 294), Wei (2003: 420, Fig. 222), Francisco-Ortega et al. (2010: 320).
Etymology: —The specific epithet “ hainanensis ” apparently refers to Hainan Island, the type location of this species.
Vernacular name: —Vietnamese: Tráng hải nam.
description: Published as part of Quang, Bui Hong & Nuraliev, Maxim S., 2021, The genus Chionanthus (Oleaceae) in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, pp. 167-195 in Phytotaxa 525 (3) on pages 169-170, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.525.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5712386
Chionanthus harmandii de Juana Clavero 2016
Creators: name: Quang, Bui Hong
name: Nuraliev, Maxim S.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Plantae
Tracheophyta
Magnoliopsida
Lamiales
Oleaceae
Chionanthus
Chionanthus harmandii

description: 2. Chionanthus harmandii (Gagnep.) de Juana Clavero (2016: 16).
≡ Linociera harmandii Gagnepain (1932: 786). Gagnepain (1933: 1069, Fig. 121, 4–7).
TYPE: — LAOS. Savannakhet: Banks of Se Bang Hieng [Banghiang] river, August 1877, F.J. Harmand in herb. L. Pierre 1822 (probable holotype: P: P00640675 photo!). (Fig. 2)
Image of holotype available at
https://science.mnhn.fr/institution/mnhn/collection/p/item/p00640675
description: Published as part of Quang, Bui Hong & Nuraliev, Maxim S., 2021, The genus Chionanthus (Oleaceae) in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, pp. 167-195 in Phytotaxa 525 (3) on page 171, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.525.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5712386
Chionanthus henryanus Green 1995
Creators: name: Quang, Bui Hong
name: Nuraliev, Maxim S.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Plantae
Tracheophyta
Magnoliopsida
Lamiales
Oleaceae
Chionanthus
Chionanthus henryanus

description: 3. Chionanthus henryanus Green (1995: 326).
≡ Linociera henryi Li (1944b: 313) [non C. henryae Li (1966: 63)].
TYPE: — CHINA. Yunnan: Szemao, eastern mountains, 4500 feet [1370 m], A. Henry 12042 (lectotype, designated by Green [1995: 326]: A: 00046860 photo!; isolectotypes: E: E00284859 photo!, K: K000978716 photo!). (Fig. 3)
Images of lectotype and isolectotypes available at
https://s3.amazonaws.com/huhwebimages/3BD6B063953B4E7/ type /full/46860.jpg
http://data.rbge.org.uk/herb/E00284859
http://www.kew.org/herbcatimg/592260.jpg
= Chionanthus helferi Panigrahi (1985: 58) (as « heleri »), nom. illeg. TYPE: —not designated.
description: Published as part of Quang, Bui Hong & Nuraliev, Maxim S., 2021, The genus Chionanthus (Oleaceae) in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, pp. 167-195 in Phytotaxa 525 (3) on page 173, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.525.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5712386
Chionanthus macrothyrsus Soejarto & L. K. Phan
Creators: name: Quang, Bui Hong
name: Nuraliev, Maxim S.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Plantae
Tracheophyta
Magnoliopsida
Lamiales
Oleaceae
Chionanthus
Chionanthus macrothyrsus

description: 4. Chionanthus macrothyrsus (Merr.) Soejarto & L.K.Phan in Soejarto et al. (2004: 435, Plate LIX).
≡ Linociera macrothyrsa Merrill (1942: 189). Ho (2003: 883, Fig. 7557), Ly (2003: 1168).
TYPE: — VIETNAM. Lao Cai: Chapa [Sa Pa area], open forests, ca. 1500 m, white-flowered tree about 5 m high, August 1940, P.A. Pételot 2690 (holotype: A: 00063061 photo!; isotypes: HNU!; VNM: VNM00015758!).
Image of holotype available at
https://s3.amazonaws.com/huhwebimages/1373C12C248444F/ type /full/63061.jpg
Etymology: —The specific epithet “ macrothyrsus ” apparently refers to the large paniculate inflorescences characteristic of this species.
Vernacular name: —Vietnamese: Tráng cụm hoa to.
description: Published as part of Quang, Bui Hong & Nuraliev, Maxim S., 2021, The genus Chionanthus (Oleaceae) in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, pp. 167-195 in Phytotaxa 525 (3) on page 174, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.525.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5712386
Chionanthus mala-elengi Green 1984
Creators: name: Quang, Bui Hong
name: Nuraliev, Maxim S.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Plantae
Tracheophyta
Magnoliopsida
Lamiales
Oleaceae
Chionanthus
Chionanthus mala-Elengi

description: 5. Chionanthus mala-elengi (Dennst.) Green (1984:124).
≡ Forsythia mala-elengi Dennstedt(1818:31). LECTOTYPE (designated by Green [1984: 124]):—Tab. 55 in Hortus indicus malabaricus 5 by van Rheede tot Drakestein (1685: t. 55).
Lectotype image available at
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/14377#page/156/mode/1up
Literature: — Green (1996: 767, 2003: 264), Newman et al. (2007: 248), Cho et al. (2016: 141), Jin et al. (2016: 160).
Etymology: —The specific epithet “ mala-elengi ” refers to van Rheede tot Drakestein’s (1685) name “Mala Elengi” for this plant, which is translated as “mountain Mimusops elengi L.” from the local language (Green 1984).
Notes: —The species is subdivided into three subspecies, two of which, including the type subspecies, are endemic to southern India (Green 1996, 2003, Govaerts & Green 2020). One subspecies in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam.
description: Published as part of Quang, Bui Hong & Nuraliev, Maxim S., 2021, The genus Chionanthus (Oleaceae) in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, pp. 167-195 in Phytotaxa 525 (3) on page 175, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.525.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5712386
Chionanthus maxwellii Green 2000
Creators: name: Quang, Bui Hong
name: Nuraliev, Maxim S.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Plantae
Tracheophyta
Magnoliopsida
Lamiales
Oleaceae
Chionanthus
Chionanthus maxwellii

description: 6. Chionanthus maxwellii Green (2000a: 194)
TYPE: — THAILAND. Chiang Mai: Chiang Dao District, Doi Sahm Mein, Huay Nam Ru area, partly shaded place along a small stream in the remnants of the primary, mostly evergreen, forest, granite bedrock, 1400 m, tree 15 m, dbh 42 cm, corolla white, no odour, 28 February 1990, J.F. Maxwell 90-255 (holotype: L: possibly L.2674062 photo!; isotype: L).
Image of holotype available at https://data.biodiversitydata.nl/naturalis/specimen/L.2674062
Literature: — Green (2000b: 292), Newman et al. (2007: 248), Jin et al. (2016: 160).
Etymology: —The species is named in honor of James F. Maxwell, the collector of its type, who has also made many and excellent other collections over a number of years (Green 2000a).
Habitat and phenology: —Primary evergreen forest, along streams and rivers, at 547–1400 m a.s.l. Flowering in February.
Distribution in the region: — Laos: Khammouane (Nam Theun).
Distribution worldwide: — Thailand: Chiang Mai.
Additional specimens examined:— LAOS. Khammouane: riverside trails east of Keng Meow (Cat Waterfall) on Nam Theun, primary evergreen riverine forest, 17°47’28.9’’N, 105°20’21.9’’E, 547 m, tree to 10 m, dbh to 15 cm, flowers yellow, 14 February 2005, M.F. Newman, P.I. Thomas, K.E. Armstrong, K. Sengdala, V. Lamxay LAO 189 (E: E00208762, not seen; L: L0476885; P: P03406841).
description: Published as part of Quang, Bui Hong & Nuraliev, Maxim S., 2021, The genus Chionanthus (Oleaceae) in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, pp. 167-195 in Phytotaxa 525 (3) on page 178, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.525.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5712386
Chionanthus microbotrys Green 1996
Creators: name: Quang, Bui Hong
name: Nuraliev, Maxim S.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Plantae
Tracheophyta
Magnoliopsida
Lamiales
Oleaceae
Chionanthus
Chionanthus microbotrys

description: 7. Chionanthus microbotrys (Kerr) Green (1996: 768). ≡ Linociera microbotrys Kerr (1938: 130, as “ microbotrya ”).
TYPE: — THAILAND. Saraburi: Muak Lek, evergreen scrub, ca. 200 m, flowers whitish, 30 August 1924, A.F.G. Kerr 9060 (lectotype, designated by Green [1996: 768]: K: K000978789 photo!; isolectotypes: BK; BM: BM000997615 photo!; P: P00640645 photo!). (Fig. 4)
Images of lectotype and isolectotypes available at
http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000978789
https://data.nhm.ac.uk/object/4d108c89-5738-4707-99c9-d23b9fc355ff
http://coldb.mnhn.fr/catalognumber/mnhn/p/p00640645
Literature: — Green (2000b: 283, Fig. 15), Newman et al. (2007: 248), Cho et al. (2016: 141), Jin et al. (2016: 160).
Etymology: —The specific epithet “ microbotrys ” apparently refers to short inflorescences of this species, a characteristic indicated by Kerr (1938) as a distinctive one from C. ramiflorus.
description: Published as part of Quang, Bui Hong & Nuraliev, Maxim S., 2021, The genus Chionanthus (Oleaceae) in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, pp. 167-195 in Phytotaxa 525 (3) on page 178, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.525.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5712386
Chionanthus microstigma Green 1996
Creators: name: Quang, Bui Hong
name: Nuraliev, Maxim S.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Plantae
Tracheophyta
Magnoliopsida
Lamiales
Oleaceae
Chionanthus
Chionanthus microstigma

description: 8. Chionanthus microstigma (Gagnep.) Green (1996:768).
≡ Linociera microstigma Gagnepain (1932: 786). Gagnepain (1933: 1070), Kerr (1939: 412), Ho (2003: 883, Fig. 7558), Ly (2003: 1168).
TYPE: — CAMBODIA. Stung-streng [Stung Treng], Khon, August 1866, C. Thorel 2219 (lectotype, designated here: P: P00640647 photo!; isolectotypes:A: 00105317 photo!; K; P: P00640648 photo!, P00640649; photo!; US: 00513434 photo!; VNM: VNM00015706!).
Images of lectotype and isolectotypes available at
http://coldb.mnhn.fr/catalognumber/mnhn/p/p00640647
https://kiki.huh.harvard.edu/databases/specimen_search.php?mode=details&id=37750
http://coldb.mnhn.fr/catalognumber/mnhn/p/p00640648
http://coldb.mnhn.fr/catalognumber/mnhn/p/p00640649
http://n 2t.net/ark:/65665/3c96011ee-72f4-4bcf-9fc1-63d08f6beaab
= Linociera sangda Gagnepain (1932: 787). Gagnepain (1933: 1070), Kerr (1939: 415), Ho (2003: 885, Fig. 7565), Ly (2003: 1169). ≡ Chionanthus sangda (Gagnep.) Soejarto & L.K.Phan in Soejarto et al. (2004: 435). TYPE: — VIETNAM. Khanh Hoa: near Nha Trang, Tre Island, tree 5 m tall, flowers white, 14 April 1922, E. Poilane 3013 (lectotype, designated here: P: P00640656 photo!; isolectotypes: A: 00105323 photo!; K; NY: 00297260 photo!; P: P00640657 photo!, P00640658 photo!; VNM: VNM00015697!, VNM00015698!, VNM00015699!, VNM00015702!, VNM00015703!).
Literature: — Green (2000b: 291), Newman et al. (2007: 248), Toyama et al. (2013a: 101, 2013b: 190), Cho et al. (2016: 141), Jin et al. (2016: 160).
Etymology: —The species is named after its punctiform stigma (Gagnepain 1932).
Vernacular names: —Vietnamese: Cây tráng, Xo cam bo, Crou bo, Tráng nhụy nhỏ.
description: Published as part of Quang, Bui Hong & Nuraliev, Maxim S., 2021, The genus Chionanthus (Oleaceae) in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, pp. 167-195 in Phytotaxa 525 (3) on page 179, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.525.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5712386
Chionanthus parkinsonii Bennet & Raizada 1981
Creators: name: Quang, Bui Hong
name: Nuraliev, Maxim S.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Plantae
Tracheophyta
Magnoliopsida
Lamiales
Oleaceae
Chionanthus
Chionanthus parkinsonii

description: 9. Chionanthus parkinsonii (Hutch.) Bennet & Raizada (1981: 68).
≡ Linociera parkinsonii Hutchinson (1919: 229). Kerr (1939: 413), Kress et al. (2003: 319). ≡ Chionanthus parkinsonii (Hutch.) Nair & Janardhanan (1981: 331), isonym.
TYPE: — INDIA. Andaman Islands, Middle Andaman Island, Born-lung-ta, 0–200 m, May 1916, C.E. Parkinson 1210 (lectotype, designated by Green [2003: 263]: K: K000978772 photo!).
Image of lectotype available at
http://specimens.kew.org/herbarium/K000978772
= Linociera calcicola Kerr (1938: 129). Kerr (1939: 410). ≡ Chionanthus calcicola (Kerr) Kiew (1979: 265, Fig. 2). Green (2000b: 290), Gardner et al. (2018: 1701). TYPE: — THAILAND. Trang: Kau Libong [Ko Libong Island], rocky limestone hill, ca. 100 m, 22 April 1930, A.F.G. Kerr 19077 (lectotype, designated by Kiew [1979: 265]: K: K000978786 photo!; isolectotypes: BM: BM000997617 photo!; E: E00284880 photo!; L: L0931189; P: P00640659 photo!).
= Linociera brachythyrsa Merrill (1939: 351). Ho (2003: 883, Fig. 7556), Ly (2003: 1168). ≡ Chionanthus brachythyrsus (Merr.) Green (1995: 326), Chang et al. (1996: 293), Wei (2003: 420), Newman et al. (2007: 248), Francisco-Ortega et al. (2010: 339), Jin et al. (2016: 159). TYPE: — VIETNAM. Lang Son: near Van Linh, near small streams, tree 5–6 m, flowers reddish, February 1938, P.A. Pételot 6293 (lectotype: A, first-step lectotype designated by Green [1995: 326], second-step lectotype designated here: A: 00055100 photo!; isolectotypes: A: 00105314 photo!; NY: 00297258 photo!; P: P00640660 photo!; US: 00112799 photo!; VNM: VNM00015759!).
= Linociera leucoclada Merrill & Chun (1940: 170). Miao (1992: 112), Chia (1955: 349, Fig. 9). ≡ Chionanthus leucocladus (Merr. & Chun) B.M.Miao in Miao & Chang (1987: 18). TYPE: — CHINA. Hainan: Ling-Shui District, Seven Finger Mountains, mixed forests, tree 12 m tall, flowers white, 12 January 1934, C. Wang 36469 (holotype: A: 00046859 photo!; isotypes: IBSC: 0002809; NY: 00297261 photo!).
Literature: — Panigrahi (1985: 60), Green (2000b: 290, 2003: 263), Newman et al. (2007: 248), Jin et al. (2016: 160), Gardner et al. (2018: 1701).
Etymology:— The specific epithet “ parkinsonii ” apparently commemorates C.E. Parkinson, the collector of both syntypes of this species.
Vernacular name: —Vietnamese: Tráng hoa ngắn.
description: Published as part of Quang, Bui Hong & Nuraliev, Maxim S., 2021, The genus Chionanthus (Oleaceae) in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, pp. 167-195 in Phytotaxa 525 (3) on page 181, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.525.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5712386
Chionanthus robinsonii
Creators: name: Quang, Bui Hong
name: Nuraliev, Maxim S.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Plantae
Tracheophyta
Magnoliopsida
Lamiales
Oleaceae
Chionanthus
Chionanthus robinsonii

description: 11. Chionanthus robinsonii (Gagnep.) B.H.Quang in Bui et al. (2014: 197).
≡ Linociera robinsonii Gagnepain (1932: 787). Gagnepain (1933: 1072), Ho (2003: 885, Fig. 7564), Ly (2003: 1169).
TYPE: — VIETNAM. Khanh Hoa: Nha Trang and vicinity, small tree at 100 m elevation, 11–26 March 1911, C.B. Robinson 1419 (lectotype, designated here: P: P00640721 photo!; isolectotypes: K: K000978790 photo!; NY: 00297265 photo!, 00297266 photo!; US: 00513431 photo!). (Fig. 6)
Images of lectotype and isolectotypes available at
http://coldb.mnhn.fr/catalognumber/mnhn/p/p00640721
http://specimens.kew.org/herbarium/K000978790
http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/vh/specimen-details/?irn=735682
http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/vh/specimen-details/?irn=735683
http://n 2t.net/ark:/65665/3bc5d5efe-a3da-4212-884a-3622bbabbc4c
= Linociera verticillata Gagnepain (1932: 788). Gagnepain (1933: 1072, Fig. 121, 8–12, Fig. 122, 1), Li (1943: 372), Ho (2003: 886, Fig. 7568), Ly (2003: 1169). ≡ Chionanthus verticillatus (Gagnep.) Soejarto & L.K.Phan in Soejarto et al. (2004: 436, Plate LX), syn. nov. TYPE: — VIETNAM. Phanrang [Ninh Thuan]: Ca Na, tree 12–14 m tall, flowers green yellow, 600 m, 10 December 1923, E. Poilane 9075 (lectotype, designated here: P: P03426329 photo!).
description: Published as part of Quang, Bui Hong & Nuraliev, Maxim S., 2021, The genus Chionanthus (Oleaceae) in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, pp. 167-195 in Phytotaxa 525 (3) on page 185, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.525.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5712386
Chionanthus ramiflorus Roxburgh 1820
Creators: name: Quang, Bui Hong
name: Nuraliev, Maxim S.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Plantae
Tracheophyta
Magnoliopsida
Lamiales
Oleaceae
Chionanthus
Chionanthus ramiflorus

description: 10. Chionanthus ramiflorus Roxburgh (1820: 106).
≡ Linociera ramiflora (Roxb.) Wall. ex Don (1837: 52). De Candolle (1844: 297), Merrill (1923: 304), Kerr (1939: 413), Kobuski (1940: 334), Chia (1955: 351, Fig. 13, 16, 17), Li (1963: 765, Fig. 307), Backer & Bakhuizen van den Brink (1965: 214), Pai (1986: 628, Fig. 178(4–6)), Miao (1992: 114), Ho (2003: 884, Fig. 7563), Kress et al. (2003: 319), Ly (2003: 1169).
TYPE: — INDONESIA. Moluccas [The Maluku Islands]: cult. Hort. Bot. Calcutta, Roxburgh in Wallich 2824b (holotype: K-W, possibly K000978769). (Fig. 5)
= Linociera macrophylla Wall. ex Don (1837: 53). De Candolle (1844: 297), Clarke (1882: 610), Gamble (1923: 795), Gagnepain (1933: 1068), Kanjilal et al. (1939: 236), Merrill & Chun (1940: 171), Kress et al. (2003: 319). ≡ Chionanthus macrophyllus (Wall. ex G.Don) Blume (1851: 317). Kurz (1877: 159), Nair & Janardhanan (1981: 331). TYPE: — BANGLADESH. Silhet [Sylhet], 1831, N. Wallich 2826 (holotype: K-W; isotypes: BM: BM000997619 photo!, BM000997620 photo!, BM000997621 photo!; BR; E; P: P00640722; M; NY: 00297262 photo!; S: S09-35927 photo!, S09-35929 photo!).
= Olea attenuata Wall. ex Don (1837: 48). De Candolle (1844: 286). ≡ Linociera macrophylla var. attenuata (Wall. ex G.Don) Clarke (1882: 611). Craib (1912: 128), Gagnepain (1933: 1068), Kerr (1939: 413). TYPE: — MYANMAR. Banks of the river Martaban, 1831, N. Wallich 2839 (holotype: K-W: K001118004 photo!; isotype: P: P00640723 photo!).
Extensive synonymy for this species is provided by Panigrahi (1985), Green (2003) and Kiew (1998).
Literature: — Wight (1843: t. 734), Miquel (1856: 551), Bentham & Mueller (1869: 301), Kiew (1979: 274, 1980: 388, 1981: 150, 1989: 289, Fig. 1, 1998: 473, 2002: 155, 2015: 291), Panigrahi (1985: 53), Miao & Chang (1987: 18), Corner (1988: 601, Plate 193), Chang et al. (1996: 293), Coode et al. (1996: 248), Yang & Lu (1998: 128), Green (2000b: 283, Fig. 14, 2003: 260), Kessler et al. (2002: 101), Kress et al. (2003: 317), Wei (2003: 420, Fig. 223), Soejarto et al. (2004: 435), Gardner et al. (2007: 255, 2018: 1702), Newman et al. (2007: 248), Francisco-Ortega et al. (2010: 339), Wen & Fang (2011: 781), Xu & Xia (2011: 130), Toyama et al. (2013a: 101, 2013b: 191), Cho et al. (2016: 141), Jin et al. (2016: 160), Tagane et al. (2017: 483, Fig. 476).
Etymology: —The specific epithet “ ramiflorus ” means “branch-flowered” and apparently refers to the cauliflorous inflorescences described in the protologue (Roxburgh 1820).
Vernacular names: —Vietnamese: Hổ bì (in the North), Tráng lá to, lý lãm hoa cành (in the South).
description: Published as part of Quang, Bui Hong & Nuraliev, Maxim S., 2021, The genus Chionanthus (Oleaceae) in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, pp. 167-195 in Phytotaxa 525 (3) on page 182, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.525.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5712386
Chionanthus subcapitatus
Creators: name: Quang, Bui Hong
name: Nuraliev, Maxim S.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Plantae
Tracheophyta
Magnoliopsida
Lamiales
Oleaceae
Chionanthus
Chionanthus subcapitatus

description: 12. Chionanthus subcapitatus (Merr.) B.H.Quang in Bui et al. (2014: 197).
≡ Linociera subcapitata Merrill (1942: 189). Ho (2003: 885, Fig. 7666), Ly (2003: 1169).
TYPE: — VIETNAM. Lang Son: Mau Son massif, ca. 1200 m, January 1925, P.A. Pételot 1720 (holotype: A: 00063060 photo!; image of holotype: K!; isotype: VNM: 00015739!).
Image of holotype available at
https://kiki.huh.harvard.edu/databases/specimen_search.php?mode=details&id=23462
Literature: — de Juana Clavero (2016: 15).
Etymology: —The specific epithet “ subcapitatus ” apparently refers to subcapitate inflorescences (described by Merrill, 1942, as small depressed-globose heads of sessile or subsessile flowers), which are unique for the genus in Asia.
Vernacular name: —Vietnamese: Tráng đầu.
description: Published as part of Quang, Bui Hong & Nuraliev, Maxim S., 2021, The genus Chionanthus (Oleaceae) in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, pp. 167-195 in Phytotaxa 525 (3) on page 188, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.525.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5712386
Chionanthus thorelii Green 1996
Creators: name: Quang, Bui Hong
name: Nuraliev, Maxim S.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Plantae
Tracheophyta
Magnoliopsida
Lamiales
Oleaceae
Chionanthus
Chionanthus thorelii

description: 13. Chionanthus thorelii (Gagnep.) Green (1996: 769). ≡ Linociera thorelii Gagnepain (1932: 788). Gagnepain (1933: 1069), Kerr (1939: 415), Ho (2003: 886, Fig. 7567), Ly (2003: 1169), Newman et al. (2007: 249), Jin et al. (2016: 161).
TYPE: — CAMBODIA. Kpong Province [most likely Thpong District of Kampong Speu Province]: Knang Repoen mountains, 1200 m, treelet 8–10 m tall, May 1870, L. Pierre 862 (lectotype, designated here: P: P00640718 photo!; isolectotypes: A: 00105326 photo!; P: P00640719 photo!; VNM: VNM00015738!).
Images of lectotype and isolectotypes available at
http://coldb.mnhn.fr/catalognumber/mnhn/p/p00640718
https://s3.amazonaws.com/huhwebimages/8803C5911418402/ type /full/105326.jpg
http://coldb.mnhn.fr/catalognumber/mnhn/p/p00640719
= Linociera procera Kerr (1938: 131). Kerr (1939: 413). TYPE: — THAILAND. Krat [Trat Province]: Kao Kuap [Khao Kuap mountain], evergreen forest, ca. 700 m, tree ca. 25 m high, 25 December 1929, A.F.G. Kerr 17767 (lectotype, designated by Green [1996: 769]: K: K000978792 photo!; isolectotypes: BK; BM: BM000997613 photo!; E: E00284878 photo!; L: L.2674088 photo!; P: P00640715 photo!).
Literature: — Green (2000b: 287), Toyama et al. (2013a: 101, 2013b: 192), Cho et al. (2016: 141), Jin et al. (2016: 160), Tagane et al. (2017: 484, Fig. 477), Gardner et al. (2018: 1703).
Etymology: —According to the protologue of Linociera thorelii, the species is dedicated to C. Thorel, an excellent collector who herbarized in Indochina from 1862 to 1868 (Gagnepain 1932).
Vernacular name: —Vietnamese: Tráng Thorel.
description: Published as part of Quang, Bui Hong & Nuraliev, Maxim S., 2021, The genus Chionanthus (Oleaceae) in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, pp. 167-195 in Phytotaxa 525 (3) on page 189, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.525.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5712386
Caraphia minor Gahan 1906
Creators: name: Ohbayashi, Nobuo
name: Lin, Mei-Ying
name: Yamasako, Junsuke
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2016
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Cerambycidae
Caraphia
Caraphia minor

description: 3. Caraphia minor Gahan, 1906
(Figs 12, 13, 52, 68, 84, 100)
Caraphia minor Gahan, 1906: 76 (Type locality: "Karen Mts., Burma (current Myanmar)"); Aurivillius, 1912: 177; Boppe, 1921: 52; Hayashi & Villiers, 1985: 24, 25; Chou & N. Ohbayashi, 2008: 139.
Diagnosis. Female: BL= 9.9 mm; EW= 2.6 mm. Body brownish. Head, pronotum and scape with dense pale yellowish hairs which are relatively long and thin, suberect with bent down tip. Antennae with scape short and thick, 1.80 times as long as wide; relative length of segments from 1st to 6th: 58: 15: 53: 56: 84: 84 (the type specimen lacking left apical 5 segments and right 10 segments). Elytra with foveae arranged in regular rows but more or less irregular beside suture and apical area; scales relatively long and thin, suberect and curved, 2.3 times as long as the diameter of each fovea, alternating on rows of foveae.
Male: Unknown to us.
Type material examined. Lectotype (designated herein): ♀, Karen Mts., Birmah (current Myanmar), Doherty leg. (Fry Coll. 1905. 100) (BMNH).
Distribution. Myanmar.
Remarks. This rather small species is similar to C. huai sp. nov., but is easy to distinguish by its differently shaped pronotum, apically convergent elytra, and long and slender scales of the elytra.
Only a female syntype specimen was available for study. According to the original description of Gahan (1906), this species was described from two specimens but mainly on a female specimen with the antennae " extending by about the last two joints past the apex of elytra " (several apical segments are lost now). The second specimen (7.5 mm) was considered to be a male (" the male of this species, if I am right in considering as such the smaller of the only two specimens I have seen, differs but little from the female — the antennae are little longer, extending by nearly three joints past the apex of elytra; ..... "). We could not locate this second small specimen, but the female syntype preserved in BMNH fits well the original description, and we designate it as the lectotype in order to stabilize the taxon.
description: Published as part of Ohbayashi, Nobuo, Lin, Mei-Ying & Yamasako, Junsuke, 2016, Revision of the Caraphiini, New Tribe (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lepturinae), pp. 187-217 in Zootaxa 4084 (2) on page 192, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4084.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/1054040
Caraphia granulifera Holzschuh 1984
Creators: name: Ohbayashi, Nobuo
name: Lin, Mei-Ying
name: Yamasako, Junsuke
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2016
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Cerambycidae
Caraphia
Caraphia granulifera

description: 2. Caraphia granulifera Holzschuh, 1984
(Figs 9, 10, 11, 44, 51, 67, 83, 99, 115, 129)
Caraphia granulifera Holzschuh, 1984: 141, fig. 1 (Type locality: Dhunche, Trisuli Khola, Nawakot, C-Nepal); Weigei, 2006: 497; Chou & N. Ohbayashi, 2008: 141.
Diagnosis. Male: BL=13.0– 14.3 mm; EW= 3.6–3.8 mm. Body mostly reddish brown. Head, pronotum and scape with dense yellowish scales. Head with inter-ocular distance very wide, nearly half of head width; antennae slightly exceeding elytral apex; relative lengths of segments from base to apex: 50: 15: 54: 54: 80: 78: 74: 71: 75: 69: 80.
Pronotum distinctly wider than long, constricted at apical and basal fourth; sides triangularly inflated laterally; disk with a pair of small protuberant behind anterior constriction.
Elytra narrowed from base to apex, foveate in regular rows except for along suture and apical area which are irregularly arranged; scales pale yellow, relatively long and thin, suberect and barely curved, 2.0 times as long as the diameter of foveae, mostly alternating on rows of foveae.
Genitalia (Fig. 115) with paramere of tegmen wide and short, 2.44 times as long as basal width, slightly attenuate toward rounded apices, 0.17 times as long as tegmen. Median lobe with dorsal plate almost reaching the apex of ventral plate; basal struts slightly shorter than a half of median lobe. Endophallus (Fig. 129) rather simple and elongate, MPH roundly inflated and with indistinct sclerites near base; APH claviform with a pair of small dorsal projections near base, without rod-like sclerite.
Female: BL= 14.1 mm; EW= 3.8 mm. Similar to male in body color, foveae and scales, but antennae distinctly short, reaching apical fifth of elytra; relative lengths of segments from base to apex: 47: 14: 49: 46: 65: 58: 55: 51: 51: 49: 60. Elytra slightly widened from humeri to apical fourth.
Type materials examined. Holotype: ♂, C-Nepal, Nawakot, Trisuli Khola, 2,200 m, Dhunche, 15–21-X- 1982, C. Holzschuh leg., Geschlüpft aus Dürren Ästen: Quercus Imago in Puppenviege (PCCH). Paratype: 1♀, same data as holotype, Geschlüpft aus Dürren Ästen: IX. 1982 (PCCH).
Other material examined. 1♂, same data as holotype, Geschlüpft aus Dürren Ästen: Rhododendron, 6-II- 1986 (PCCH).
Distribution. Nepal.
Remarks. This species is most similar to C. cribrata, but easily distinguishable by its short antennae, wide inter-ocular distance, and indistinct elytral carinae. According to the original description, the adults were reared from Quercus sp. and Rhododendron sp.
description: Published as part of Ohbayashi, Nobuo, Lin, Mei-Ying & Yamasako, Junsuke, 2016, Revision of the Caraphiini, New Tribe (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lepturinae), pp. 187-217 in Zootaxa 4084 (2) on pages 191-192, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4084.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/1054040
Caraphia laosica Gressitt & Rondon 1970
Creators: name: Ohbayashi, Nobuo
name: Lin, Mei-Ying
name: Yamasako, Junsuke
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2016
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Cerambycidae
Caraphia
Caraphia laosica

description: 6. Caraphia laosica Gressitt & Rondon, 1970
(Figs 19, 20, 55, 71, 87, 103, 118, 132)
Caraphia laosica Gressitt & Rondon, 1970: 30, fig. 7d (Type locality: "Khongxedon, Wapikhamthong District, Laos " (current Saravane Prov., Laos)); Hayashi & Villiers, 1985: 24, 26; Chou & N. Ohbayashi, 2008: 141.
Diagnosis. Male: BL= 11.9–12.2 mm; EW= 3.1 mm. Body mostly blackish brown. Antennae brown, exceeding elytral apex at the middle of 9th segment; scape 3.2 times as long as wide; relative lengths of segments from base to apex: 63: 14: 51: 50: 86: 86: 74: 74: 74: 72: 80. Pronotum 1.2 times as long as basal width, basal half nearly parallel-sided then slightly convergent apically; sub-recumbent scales becoming short and thin besides median area and the scales showing obscure three longitudinal vittae. Elytra densely and rather regularly foveate in rows; scales pale yellow, suberect and barely curved, truncate at the apex, 1.5 times as long as the diameter of each fovea, alternating on rows of foveae.
Genitalia (Fig. 118) with paramere of tegmen gently narrowed apically, 4.35 times as long as basal width, 0.21 times as long as tegmen. Median lobe with dorsal plate same length as ventral plate; basal struts distinctly shorter than one-third of median lobe. Endophallus (Fig. 132) with MPH turned up dorsally at the middle, with dense hairlike fine spicules and a pair of sclerites near base; APH narrowed, with a rod-like sclerite.
Female: Unknown.
Type material examined. Holotype: ♂, Khong Sedone, Wapikhamthong Prov., Laos, 18-IV-1965 (J. A. Rondon Collection, BPBM). Paratype: 1♂, same locality, 16-V-1965 (J. A. Rondon Collection, BPBM).
Distribution. Laos.
Remarks. Only the two type specimens are known. This species can be distinguished from the other congeners by its dark brown body color, pronotum with vague longitudinal vittae of scales, and the structure of tegmen of male genitalia. The record of this species from Hainan, China by Hua et al. (1993) was a misidentification of C. taiwana.
description: Published as part of Ohbayashi, Nobuo, Lin, Mei-Ying & Yamasako, Junsuke, 2016, Revision of the Caraphiini, New Tribe (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lepturinae), pp. 187-217 in Zootaxa 4084 (2) on page 194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4084.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/1054040
Caraphia depressa Holzschuh 2003
Creators: name: Ohbayashi, Nobuo
name: Lin, Mei-Ying
name: Yamasako, Junsuke
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2016
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Cerambycidae
Caraphia
Caraphia depressa

description: 4. Caraphia depressa Holzschuh, 2003
(Figs 14, 15, 16, 45, 53, 69, 85, 101, 116, 130)
Caraphia depressa Holzschuh, 2003: 147, fig. 1 (Type locality: Pahang, Cameron Highlands, Malaysia); Chou & N. Ohbayashi, 2008: 142.
Diagnosis. Male: BL= 11.3–11.5 mm. Body dark reddish brown, rather stout; antennae brown; scales of elytra orange-yellow, suberect and barely curved, 2.0 times as long as the diameter of each fovea. Antennae with apical two segments exceeding the elytral apex; scape short and thick, 1.92 times as long as wide, relative lengths of segments from base to apex: 54: 15: 61: 61: 89: 86: 84: 81: 81: 77: 88.
Pronotum same as long as wide, provided with lateral triangular tubercles, deeply constricted near apical third and moderately so at basal fourth; disk between constriction with a pair of protuberant.
Elytra with disk swollen basally, then widely depressed behind the swellings; foveae denser on basal sixth, then moderately but rather irregularly arranged in rows; scales orange yellow, semi-circularly curved, alternating on rows of foveae except for inner 4–5 rows.
Genitalia (Fig. 116) with paramere of tegmen 3.45 times as long as basal width, straightly attenuate apically, 0.17 times as long as tegmen. Median lobe with dorsal plate slightly shorter than ventral plate; basal struts distinctly short, 1/3 length of median lobe. Endophallus (Fig. 130) rather simple and elongate; MPH inflated basally, with a pair of indistinct sclerites, and bent dorsally at a right angle; APH roundly swollen basally; ejaculatory duct thick.
Female: BL= 11.7–12.3 mm. Similar to male in body color, foveae and scales. Antennae with last segment exceeding the elytral apex; scape short and thick, 0.48 times as wide as length, relative lengths of segments from base to apex: 51: 15: 62: 56: 79: 74: 73: 68: 67: 64: 74.
Type material examined. Holotype: ♂, Cameron Highland, 1,600 m, Tanah Rata, Malaysia, 11–27-II-2000, J. Horák leg. (PCCH). Paratype: 1♀, Pahan, Cameron Highland, 1.600 m, Tanah Rata, Malaysia, 11–27-II-2000, P. Pacholátko leg. (PCCH).
Other material examined. 1♂, Tanah Rata, Cameron Highland, Pahang, Malaysia, 8- III-2 0 13, R. Okano leg. (EUMJ); 1♀, Cameron Highland, 4°28'05.5"N 101°23'21.9"E, alt. 1,438 m, Pahang, Malaysia, 5-III-2015, H. Ikeda leg. (EUMJ).
Distribution. Malaysia (Pahang).
Remarks. This species is easy to distinguish from the other members of the genus by the distinct lateral tubercles of pronotum, orange colored scales and pubescence, and the broadly depressed elytral disk.
description: Published as part of Ohbayashi, Nobuo, Lin, Mei-Ying & Yamasako, Junsuke, 2016, Revision of the Caraphiini, New Tribe (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lepturinae), pp. 187-217 in Zootaxa 4084 (2) on pages 192-193, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4084.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/1054040
Caraphia lepturoides subsp. babai Makihara 1982
Creators: name: Ohbayashi, Nobuo
name: Lin, Mei-Ying
name: Yamasako, Junsuke
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2016
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Cerambycidae
Caraphia
Caraphia lepturoides
Caraphia lepturoides babai makihara, 1982

description: 11-2. Caraphia lepturoides babai Makihara, 1982
(Figs 34, 124)
Caraphia babai Makihara, 1982: 127, figs. 3, 5-D (Type locality: Takeda, Ishigaki Island, Ryukyu, Japan); Hayashi & Villiers, 1985: 24, 25, 26.
Caraphia lepturoides babai: N. Ohbayashi, 1992: 5, figs. 11-13; N. Ohbayashi, 2007: 389, pl. 14, fig. 2; Chou & N. Ohbayashi, 2008: 140.
Diagnosis. Male: BL= 9.9–11.6 mm; EW= 2.6–3.1 mm. Body mostly dark reddish brown. Close to the nominotypical subspecies, but can be distinguished by the shape of pronotum which is widest at middle instead of at base. Male genitalia (Fig. 124) very similar to the nominotypical subspecies except for more or less shorter basal struts of median lobe.
Female: BL= 12.2 mm; EW= 3.2 mm.
Material examined. Is. Ishigaki-jima: 1♂, Mt. Banna, 29-VI-1985, T. Itô leg. (EUMJ); 2 ♂♂, same locality, reared and emerged on 11-V-1989, K. Mori leg. (EUMJ); 1♂, 1♀, Sanwa, 12-IV-2013, T. Miyamoto leg. (PCST); 1♂, same locality, 30-III-2 0 13, A. Toba leg. (PCST).
Distribution. Japan (Is. Ishigaki-jima, Okinawa Pref.).
Remarks. This subspecies was first described as an independent species by Makihara (1982), but the differences from C. lepturoides are slight and it is appropriate to treat the taxon as a subspecies.
description: Published as part of Ohbayashi, Nobuo, Lin, Mei-Ying & Yamasako, Junsuke, 2016, Revision of the Caraphiini, New Tribe (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lepturinae), pp. 187-217 in Zootaxa 4084 (2) on page 198, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4084.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/1054040
Hemidactylus brookii Mahony, 2011, s.l.
Creators: name: Mahony, Stephen
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2011
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Reptilia
Squamata
Gekkonidae
Hemidactylus
Hemidactylus brookii

description: Asian Hemidactylus brookii synonyms examined
As it was common practice in the 1800s, numerous taxonomists were actively describing species, often with little or no comparison to similar species already known to science at the time (e.g., Tytler 1865). For those taxonomists not working at large museums, there was little opportunity to compare their suspected new species directly with those already described from other countries. This problem was further complicated due to the fact that many of the early species descriptions consisted of a short paragraph providing little to identify the given species from congeners. The description of H. brookii from what is now understood to be likely an introduced population on the island of Borneo, understandably was overlooked by taxonomists then working on the herpetofauna of the distant countries of India, Pakistan and Myanmar. This resulted in the description of several species which were later considered to represent a highly variable and poorly defined species, Hemidactylus brookii s.l.
description: Published as part of Mahony, Stephen, 2011, Taxonomic revision of Hemidactylus brookii Gray: a re-examination of the type series and some Asian synonyms, and a discussion of the obscure species Hemidactylus subtriedrus Jerdon (Reptilia: Gekkonidae), pp. 37-67 in Zootaxa 3042 on page 41, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.278832
Hemidactylus kushmorensis Murray 1884
Creators: name: Mahony, Stephen
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2011
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Reptilia
Squamata
Gekkonidae
Hemidactylus
Hemidactylus kushmorensis

description: Hemidactylus kushmorensis Murray, 1884
Hemidactylus kushmorensis was described based on a type series of six specimens also deposited in the Kurrachee Museum (Murray 1884b). In contrast with the above mentioned description, Murray did provide a tabulated comparison of H. kushmorensis with “allied” congeners, but excluded H. brookii. Murray also sent 13 specimens which he considered “typical of the species” to the British Museum (incorrectly referred to as “ types ” in the museum specimen register) (Boulenger 1890). These specimens conform with all defining characters in the original description. It is not likely that these specimens were actual representatives of the original type series due to difference in the collection localities. As in the previous case for H. gleadowi, an attempt to locate the type specimens of H. kushmorensis by the staff at the Zoological Survey of Pakistan, was unsuccessful (R. Masroor in litt. 2009). These type specimens must be considered lost, and the specimens of H. kushmorensis in BMNH are the only existing specimens representing Murray’s original concept of this taxa. In the following systematics section, I designate a neotype for H. kushmorensis (BMNH [18]87.9.22.8) to stabilise the nomenclatural status of the species. Again, the designation of a neotype results in a change of the type locality from “Bhaner, Upper Sind frontier”, to nearby “Ural, Upper Sind”. This change is beneficial as it provides an additional precise locality for H. kushmorensis whose geographical range was originally referred to broadly as “Upper Sind, Kushmore and Thool Talookas”.
description: Published as part of Mahony, Stephen, 2011, Taxonomic revision of Hemidactylus brookii Gray: a re-examination of the type series and some Asian synonyms, and a discussion of the obscure species Hemidactylus subtriedrus Jerdon (Reptilia: Gekkonidae), pp. 37-67 in Zootaxa 3042 on page 43, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.278832
Caraphia squamosa Ohbayashi & Lin & Yamasako 2016, comb. nov.
Creators: name: Ohbayashi, Nobuo
name: Lin, Mei-Ying
name: Yamasako, Junsuke
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2016
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Cerambycidae
Caraphia
Caraphia squamosa

description: 14. Caraphia squamosa (Chemsak & Linsley, 1984), comb. nov.
(Figs 39, 48,, 63, 79, 95, 111)
Noctileptura squamosa Chemsak & Linsley, 1984: 282 (Type locality: 12 miles North of Tuxtla Gutierrez, Chiapas, Mexico); Chemsak et al., 1992: 98; Monné & Giesbert, 1994: 167; Monné, 1995: 116; Noguera & Chemsak, 1996: 403.
Diagnosis. Female: BL= 12–13.5 mm; EW= 3.8 mm. Body dark reddish brown. Head and pronotum densely punctured with short recumbent triangular whitish scales. Antennae short, slightly exceeding elytral apex. scape slender and moderate in length, 3.0 times as long as wide, relative lengths of segments from base to apex: 63: 13: 73: 76: 64: 78: 63: 63: 58: 54: 62. Pronotum longer than basal width, with slight lateral inflation; disk provided with a pair of protuberance behind apical constriction near apical fourth. Elytra ca 2.4 times as long as wide, with 12 rows of foveae associated with recumbent spindle shaped scales which are about 0.25 times as wide as long, 2.5 times as long as the diameter of each fovea.
Male: Unknown.
Material examined. 1♀, Mexico, Chiapas. Pq. Nac. Smidero. 1000 m. 25-V-1990, H. and A. Howden leg. (CNCI).
Distribution. Mexico.
Remarks. This is a Central American species and belonging to the group in which the elytral scales are mostly associated along every row of foveae. It can be easily distinguished from the other congeners by the dense elytral punctures with remarkable recumbent spindle-shaped scales.
description: Published as part of Ohbayashi, Nobuo, Lin, Mei-Ying & Yamasako, Junsuke, 2016, Revision of the Caraphiini, New Tribe (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lepturinae), pp. 187-217 in Zootaxa 4084 (2) on page 200, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4084.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/1054040
Hemidactylus subtriedroides Annandale 1905
Creators: name: Mahony, Stephen
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2011
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Reptilia
Squamata
Gekkonidae
Hemidactylus
Hemidactylus subtriedroides

description: Hemidactylus subtriedroides Annandale, 1905
Hemidactylus subtriedroides was described from northern Burma (= Myanmar) based on two male specimens in the collection of the ZSI, which were previously misidentified as H. maculatus by Anderson (1879), the collector of the syntypes. One specimen was transferred to BMNH in 1906. Annandale’s short description was composed primarily of comparing H. subtriedroides with H. subtriedrus, a species which he considered to be the most similar in appearance. He even acknowledged H. brookii, vaguely stating that his new species differed by possessing a flatter and broader tail base, and that “The bulk is greater than that of H. Brookii Gray, the dorsal tubercles are larger and the whole animal is more depressed. The proportions are also different.” Annandale was mostly correct in this statement if considering H. brookii s.s., however due to the subjectivity of his comparison without quantifiable evidence, and perhaps more importantly, because one of the syntypes of H. brookii s.l. represented this species, it was later synonymised without discussion (Smith 1935). Loveridge (1941) appeared to recognise that this species was not typical of his concept of H. brookii and elevated it from synonymy to subspecific status as H. brookii subtriedroides, but also provided no justification for his action. Having examined both syntypes as part of this study it is clear that this is a distinct species from H. brookii s.s. It is here redescribed based on the BMNH syntype which is designated as the lectotype in accordance with Article 75.1 of the Code. The figure of Hemidactylus subtriedroides published soon after the original description (Annandale 1905b:Pl. II, Fig. 1) clearly depicts a specimen with an original tail, and thus is likely based on the paralectotype specimen designated here (ZSI 4135: Fig. 2 B). The reason for choosing the BMNH specimen as the lectotype, is that the preservation of the ZSI syntype is of a lower quality, with signs that this specimen is now, or was in the past not maintained in 70% ethanol, leading to minor soft tissue degradation. See subsequent section of H. tenkatei for further discussion regarding the taxonomic status of this species.
description: Published as part of Mahony, Stephen, 2011, Taxonomic revision of Hemidactylus brookii Gray: a re-examination of the type series and some Asian synonyms, and a discussion of the obscure species Hemidactylus subtriedrus Jerdon (Reptilia: Gekkonidae), pp. 37-67 in Zootaxa 3042 on page 43, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.278832