cometadata/datacite-rtg-text-other-reclassification-records huggingface dataset:
Plutodes flavescens Butler 1880
Creators: name: Singh, Manpreet
name: Raha, Angshuman
name: Mallick, Kaushik
name: Kirti, Jagbir Singh
name: Singh, Navneet
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2023
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Lepidoptera
Geometridae
Plutodes
Plutodes flavescens

description: Plutodes flavescens Butler, 1880: 223
(Figs 16–17, 44–45)
TL: N.E. Himalayas
Material examined: India, Arunachal Pradesh, Dibang valley dist.: 1 ♂, Anini, Chapupani, 30.v.2017, leg. A.K. Sanyal & party (13667/H10, NZCZSI), 5 ♂, 1 ♀, Hunli, 16.ix.2011, leg. T. Goyal (13671/H10, NZCZSI); Lower Subansiri dist.: 1 ♂, Yachuli, 8.xi.2018, leg. M. Singh (13670/H10, NZCZSI). Sikkim, Gangtok dist.: 1 ♂, Singtam, 26.vii.2019, leg. M. Singh (13672/H10, NZCZSI); West Sikkim dist.: 2 ♂, Nerdang, 3.xi.2019, leg. A. K. Sanyal & party (13668–69/H10, NZCZSI), 1 ♂, Yoksum, 19.xi.2019, leg. A. K. Sanyal & party (13665/H10, NZCZSI), 1 ♂, Yoksum, 22.xi.2019, leg. A.K. Sanyal & party (13666/H10, NZCZSI). West Bengal, Darjeeling dist.: 1 ♂, Charkhole, 6.viii.2019, leg. R. Lenka & party (13673/H10, NZCZSI).
Diagnosis: Forewing length: ♂ 13–16 mm. Plutodes flavescens belongs to the ‘ cyclaria species group’ and closely resembles P. discigera Butler, 1880 and P. philornis Prout, 1926 (Yazaki and Wang 2004: 118, fig. 11) in external appearance. The identifying character that separates this species from its allied congeners is the highly zigzag shaped, rufous line with multiple angles which traverses the distal patches on both the wings. This line looks darker due to the presence of a faint yellowish background which is lacking in other species of the group. In P. discigera, the same line is irregular and slightly paler, and in P. philornis, it is curved with a single angle medially, on the distal patch of forewing, forming the silhouette of flying bird. The male genitalia have a characteristic uncus with a large spatulate tip and valva with a sacculus having an internal row of short and pointed dentation, a ventral, subapical, small, curved spine and a slender, acute, distal spine-like extension. The aedeagus is slightly curved and slender, and the vesica has a small basal patch of short cornuti.
Distribution: India: Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya (Khasia Hills), Sikkim, West Bengal (Cotes & Swinhoe 1887, Swinhoe 1900, Arandhara et al. 2017). Global: China, Indonesia (Borneo, Sumatra, Java), Malaysia, Nepal, Thailand (Holloway [1994], Yazaki 1994, Michaux 1996, Kendrick & Ades 2004, Koçak & Kemal 2010).
Remarks: Due to external similarity, Hampson (1895) and Swinhoe (1900) treated P. flavescens and P. discigera as a single species. This species also flies in the mid to upper montane semi-evergreen undisturbed forests up to 2200 m, mostly during the post-monsoon period.
description: Published as part of Singh, Manpreet, Raha, Angshuman, Mallick, Kaushik, Kirti, Jagbir Singh & Singh, Navneet, 2023, A review of the genus Plutodes Guenée (Geometridae: Ennominae) from India with description of one new species, pp. 499-523 in Zootaxa 5323 (4) on pages 511-512, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5323.4.3, http://zenodo.org/record/8212358
Plutodes pseudocyclaria Kirti & Goyal 2011
Creators: name: Singh, Manpreet
name: Raha, Angshuman
name: Mallick, Kaushik
name: Kirti, Jagbir Singh
name: Singh, Navneet
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2023
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Lepidoptera
Geometridae
Plutodes
Plutodes pseudocyclaria

description: Plutodes pseudocyclaria Kirti & Goyal, 2011: 68
(Figs 18–19, 46–47)
TL: Devikulam, Kerala (India)
Material examined: India, Kerala, Iduki dist.: 1 ♀, Prambikulam, 2.ix.2017, leg. M. Singh (13674/H10, NZCZSI); 1 ♂, Munnar, 30.x.2017 leg. M. Singh (13675/H10, NZCZSI).
Diagnosis: Forewing length: ♂ 17 mm, ♀ 19 mm. Apart from P. nilgirica, P. pseudocyclaria is another species known only from southern India. Plutodes pseudocyclaria was described on the basis of patterns of rufous patches on both the wings and male genitalia in comparison with those in the allied P. cyclaria Guenée, [1858] (Holloway 1976: 85). In fact, both are not closely related, considering all characters. Externally, P. pseudocyclaria differs from the latter mainly in the hindwing having a concavely curved outer border of the basal area and a smaller distal patch which is always separate from the basal patch. Moreover, the distal patches have pointed extensions, situated posteriorly in the forewing and anteriorly in the hindwing. In P. cyclaria, the distal patch on hindwing is larger and the basal areas often extended towards or touching the distal patch. The male genitalia of P. pseudocyclaria differ by having two closely placed claw-like processes distally on the sacculus which are widely separated in P. cyclaria. In addition, there is a rounded process more basally on the sacculus, absent in P. cyclaria. The truncate apex of uncus and cucullus-shaped distal part of valves are also distinctive. The aedeagus vesica in P pseudocyclaria is elongated having a field of 6–7 cornuti at the distal part, that in P. cyclaria is pick-axe shaped with distal row of large cornuti, and a lateral lobe having a separated field of small cornuti.
Distribution: India: Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu (Kirti & Goyal 2011, Iyer et al. 2021).
Remarks: With this present record, the species is known only from southern India. So, it may be considered endemic to this region of the country.
description: Published as part of Singh, Manpreet, Raha, Angshuman, Mallick, Kaushik, Kirti, Jagbir Singh & Singh, Navneet, 2023, A review of the genus Plutodes Guenée (Geometridae: Ennominae) from India with description of one new species, pp. 499-523 in Zootaxa 5323 (4) on page 512, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5323.4.3, http://zenodo.org/record/8212358
Plutodes discigera Butler 1880
Creators: name: Singh, Manpreet
name: Raha, Angshuman
name: Mallick, Kaushik
name: Kirti, Jagbir Singh
name: Singh, Navneet
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2023
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Lepidoptera
Geometridae
Plutodes
Plutodes discigera

description: Plutodes discigera Butler, 1880: 223
(Figs 20–21, 48–49)
TL: India
Material examined: India, Mizoram, Aizawl dist,: 1 ♂, Lengpui, 15.ix.2012, leg. A. Saxena (13676/H10, NZCZSI). West Bengal, Darjeeling dist.: 1 ♂, Chatakpur, 19.ix.2018, leg. R. Lenka & party (13677/H10, NZCZSI).
Diagnosis: Forewing length: ♂ 14 mm. Plutodes discigera is a member of the ‘ P. cyclaria species- group’ and is most closely allied to P. cyclaria and P. philornis. In P. discigera, all the patches on both the wings look similar to those in P. cyclaria, except that the distal patch on the hindwing is distinctly smaller and well separated from the basal area. In P. philornis, all the wing patches are smaller than those in P. discigera, exposing more of the yellow ground colour of the wings. Also, the rufous line traversing the distal patch on the forewing has a single angle in P. philornis (indicating the body of a flying bird) which is irregular, devoid of any distinct angle in P. discigera. In the latter, the male genitalia are strikingly similar to those of P. cyclaria, except that the saccular spines are more robust in P. discigera. However, the arrangement of spines and scobination on the pickaxe-shaped aedeagus vesica being very similar in both species.
Distribution: India: Meghalaya, Mizoram, Sikkim, West Bengal (Cotes & Swinhoe 1887, Joshi et al. 2021). Global: Papua New Guinea (Meyrick 1889, surely a misidentification).
Remarks: Hampson (1895) and Swinhoe (1900) treated P. discigera and P. flavescens as a single species. Prout (1929) treated an Indonesian species, P. argentilauta Prout, 1929 (Holloway 1982: 252), as a subspecies of P. discigera. Both treatments are definitely wrong as we know at present.
Our study provides the male genitalia illustration of this species for the first time, unfortunately partly damaged. However, important characters are visible. According to D. Sţning (pers. comm.) the apex of valva is evenly rounded and the uncus moderately spatulate and truncate distally.
description: Published as part of Singh, Manpreet, Raha, Angshuman, Mallick, Kaushik, Kirti, Jagbir Singh & Singh, Navneet, 2023, A review of the genus Plutodes Guenée (Geometridae: Ennominae) from India with description of one new species, pp. 499-523 in Zootaxa 5323 (4) on pages 512-514, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5323.4.3, http://zenodo.org/record/8212358
Plutodes transmutata Walker 1861
Creators: name: Singh, Manpreet
name: Raha, Angshuman
name: Mallick, Kaushik
name: Kirti, Jagbir Singh
name: Singh, Navneet
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2023
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Lepidoptera
Geometridae
Plutodes
Plutodes transmutata

description: Plutodes transmutata Walker, 1861: 976
(Figs 22–23, 50–51)
TL: North Hindostan [North India]
= Comibaena gavisata Walker, 1862: 1566 (TL: North Hindostan [North India])
Material examined: India, Himachal Pradesh: Kangra dist.: 1 ♂, Bir, 20.ix.2007, leg. M. Kaur (13679/H10, NZCZSI); 1 ♂, Andretta, 17.ix.2007, leg. M. Kaur (13680/H10, NZCZSI). Odisha, Keonjhar dist.: 3 ♂, Joda, Kiriburu, 14.vii.2021, leg. A. Raha & party (13678/H10, NZCZSI).
Diagnosis: Forewing length: ♂ 12–13 mm. This species is distinct from all other Plutodes by its characteristic “amoeboid” distal patch on the forewing. Its differential diagnoses with the closely allied P. quadratus sp. nov. and the Sri Lankan P. exiguifascia Hampson, 1893 are discussed under the next species.
Distribution: India: Himachal Pradesh, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha (Chandra 2007, Sondhi et al. 2018, Pathania et al. 2021). Global: China, Nepal, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Thailand (Moore 1887, Swinhoe 1900, Yazaki 1994, Kendrick 1998, Koçak & Kemal 2010).
Remarks: The species has a very wide distribution in India and occurs in the low to mid altitude tropical and subtropical forests. Although reported in several studies, the male genitalia of this species are illustrated here for the first time. The female genitalia are very similar to those of P. quadratus sp. n. (D. Sţning, pers. comm.).
description: Published as part of Singh, Manpreet, Raha, Angshuman, Mallick, Kaushik, Kirti, Jagbir Singh & Singh, Navneet, 2023, A review of the genus Plutodes Guenée (Geometridae: Ennominae) from India with description of one new species, pp. 499-523 in Zootaxa 5323 (4) on page 514, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5323.4.3, http://zenodo.org/record/8212358
Seira Lubbock 1870
Creators: name: Cipola, Nikolas Gioia
name: Morais, José Wellington De
name: Bellini, Bruno Cavalcante
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2018
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Collembola
Entomobryomorpha
Entomobryidae
Seira

description: Genus Seira Lubbock, 1870
The following characters are shared by Seira species and are not repeated in the descriptions:
Scales heavily ciliate, oval or elongated and apically rounded (rarely truncate, pointed or irregular) present on body; mac heavily ciliate apically, strongly or lightly foot-shaped or acuminate; head mic ciliate, tergal mic smooth and apically ramificate or simple (Fig. 1).
Habitus Lepidocyrtus -like with projected Th. II anterior hood; antennae shorter than the trunk length (Figs 2, 7, 12), Ant I–IV with several blunt sens of different sizes plus ciliate chaetae. Eyes 8+8 (Figs 3E, 8B, 13C). Four prelabral ciliate chaetae; labral formula with 4 (a1–2), 5 (m0–2), 5 (p0–2) smooth chaetae, a1 thicker, p0–1 larger. Labial palp with five main papillae (A–E) plus one hypostomal papilla (H) with 0,5, 0,4, 4,2 guard appendages, respectively; labium with five smooth proximal chaetae. Basolateral and basomedian labial fields with chaetae a1– 5 smooth, M1–2, E, L1–2 ciliate, r reduced. Sublobal plate with three smooth chaetae.
Th II–Abd V with ms and sens formula 1,0|1,0,1,0,0 and 1, 1|0,2,2, +,3, respectively (Figs 4–5); Abd II–IV bothriotrichal formula 2 (a5, m2), 3 (a5, m2, m5), 3 (T2, T4, D3) (Figs 4D, 5 A–B); bothriotricha with accessory lance-shaped chaetae (Fig. 1).
Pretarsi with one minute smooth chaeta on both sides; ungues inner side with 4 teeth, 2 paired basal teeth, 1 unpaired median and 1 unpaired apical; outer side with 2 paired lateral teeth and one median lamella apically pointed (Figs 11 E–F, 16E).
Mucro falcate, without basal spine.
description: Published as part of Cipola, Nikolas Gioia, Morais, José Wellington De & Bellini, Bruno Cavalcante, 2018, Three new species of Seira Lubbock (Collembola, Entomobryidae, Seirinae) from Madagascar with Lepidocyrtus - like habitus, pp. 151-173 in Zootaxa 4524 (2) on page 152, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4524.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/2610381
Seira
Creators: name: Cipola, Nikolas Gioia
name: Morais, José Wellington De
name: Bellini, Bruno Cavalcante
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2018
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Collembola
Entomobryomorpha
Entomobryidae
Seira

description: Key to Seira species from Madagascar with truncate unguiculus
1. Body pale with dark blue pigments on femur III distally (Fig. 12); Th II with series m and p with 2 (m1–2) and 0 mac, respectively (Fig. 14A); Abd IV with 7 central mac (B3 absent), and laterally with one group of about 14 mes beetween E–Fe series (Fig. 15B); manubrial plate with 4 blunt chaetae (Fig. 16H)................................ S. metafemurata sp. nov.
- Body with different pigments pattern (Figs 2, 7); Th II with series m and p with 4 (m1, m2– 2i, m4) and 3 (p1–3 present) mac, respectively (Figs 4A, 9A); Abd IV with 8 central mac (B3 present), and laterally lacking mes group (Figs 5B, 10B); manubrial plate with all chaetae pointed, without modifications (Fig. 6G)................................................. 2
2. Body with violet pigments on Th II anteriorly (Fig. 2); dorsal head with A5 and M1 mac, S3 as mic (Fig. 3E); Th III devoid of central mac (Fig. 4B).............................................................. S. lepidochaetosa sp. nov.
- Body with irregular dark pigments on Th III to Abd IV (Fig. 7); dorsal head with A5 and M1 mic, S3 as mac (Fig. 8B); Th III with 2 (p2 and p3) central mac (Fig. 9B)................................................ S. semicaerulea sp. nov.
description: Published as part of Cipola, Nikolas Gioia, Morais, José Wellington De & Bellini, Bruno Cavalcante, 2018, Three new species of Seira Lubbock (Collembola, Entomobryidae, Seirinae) from Madagascar with Lepidocyrtus - like habitus, pp. 151-173 in Zootaxa 4524 (2) on page 170, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4524.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/2610381
Heterodiomus Brethes 1925
Creators: name: Vandenberg, Natalia J.
name: Hanson, Paul E.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2019
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Coccinellidae
Heterodiomus

description: Heterodiomus Brèthes, 1925
Heterodiomus Brèthes 1925:155. Type species: Heterodiomus darwini Brèthes, 1925, by subsequent designation of Korschefsky 1931.
Diagnosis. This genus was described but not diagnosed by Brèthes (1925). The species currently included (Gordon 1999; Gordon & González 2003) are distinguished from other members of the New World Diomini by the combination of: antennae composed of 11 antennomeres, prosternum shaped like a short stemmed T, long anterior to coxal cavities (subequal to length of cavity), intercoxal process with carinae short, not extending to anterior margin, and suture between abdominal ventrites 1 and 2 partially obliterated. Members of Heterodiomus are strongly united by the shape of the female genitalia which have a bulbous base to the spermatheca and distally tapered sclerotized sheath in the basal half of the sperm duct (= “thorn-like infundibulum” sens. Gordon 1999). Although this combination of genital characteristics does not occur in the other Diomini illustrated in Gordon (1999), the corresponding structures in most species have not yet been evaluated, and a very similar configuration (Fig. 6) is found in the new genus described herein.
description: Published as part of Vandenberg, Natalia J. & Hanson, Paul E., 2019, Overview of the lady beetle tribe Diomini (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and description of a new phytophagous, silk-spinning genus from Costa Rica that induces food bodies on leaves of Piper (Piperaceae), pp. 255-285 in Zootaxa 4554 (1) on page 263, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4554.1.9, http://zenodo.org/record/2623565
REBALANCE D5.1 The concept of 'public interest' in EU law Further Study – How to support a new culture of mobility?
Creators: name: Sbrolli, Cecilia
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022

description: The aim of this Work Package (WP) 5.1 (WP 5 "Politics and Poetry"; Task 5.1: How to make use of the concept of "public interest" in EU law to support a new culture ofmobility), as stated in the proposal is to make use of the concept of ‘public interest’ in EU law to support a shift toward a new culture of mobility for the more effectiveponderation of emerging social values not yet fully considered in transport policymaking, and a better alignment with the SDGs and the mounting concerns aboutclimate change. In particular, the REBALANCE project aims at using the fluidity and multi-sidedness of this concept to propose the inclusion of subjective concepts, such as conviviality, tranquillity (quietness, peacefulness), family-friendliness, health, aesthetics and value of life (hereinafter also referred to "REBALANCE values" 1) into the formal appraisal of transport-related policy and projects.Following the analysis conducted in WP 3.3.2 (WP 3 "The Language Of The Present", Task 3.3 "Current Values behind the politics of Mobility: Critical Review", Subtask 3.3.2: "Investigation on the concept of "public interest") of the definition of the public interest (of which we provide a summary in Section 1) this task will further study the concept under EU law and will determine whether a new definition of public interest is feasible (Section 2). In addition, the role of public interest in economic appraisals will be discussed (Section 3). Finally, the results of this WP 5.1 will be discussed during a Focus Group (Section 4).
Decadiomus Chapin 1933
Creators: name: Vandenberg, Natalia J.
name: Hanson, Paul E.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2019
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Coccinellidae
Decadiomus

description: Decadiomus Chapin, 1933
Decadiomus Chapin 1933:96. Type species: Diomus bahamicus Casey, 1899, by original designation.
Diagnosis. In the New World fauna, Decadiomus species can be distinguished from most previously known Diomini by the combination of: antenna composed of 10 antennomeres, prosternum shaped like a short stemmed Y, short anterior to coxal cavities (about ½ diameter of cavity), intercoxal process with carinae extending to anterior margin or nearly so.
Decadiomus differs from the new genus described in the present paper (which also has only 10 antennomeres) by having free living, predatory larvae, and also by characteristics of the male genitalia: penis with apical flagellum (Fig. 7), and outer arm of capsule truncated or strongly reduced and not enclosing the ejaculatory duct prior to its entry into the main penis tube (Figs. 11–12).
Genital characteristics of Decadiomus males and females are included in the generic key, below, and also discussed by Gordon (1976) (as Diomus, floridanus group and bigemmeus group), and by Segarra-Carmona and Otero (2014). These characteristics may serve to differentiate Decadiomus species from the occasional occurrence of Diomini with 10 antennomeres from areas outside of the New World (e.g. in some individuals of Diomus flavolaterus (Lea) from Australia).
Remarks. The following species previously classified in Diomus are hereby transferred and represent new combinations within Decadiomus: D. balteatus (LeConte, 1878), D. floridanus (Mulsant, 1850), D. amabilis (LeConte, 1852), D. liebecki (Horn, 1895), D. myrmidon (Mulsant, 1850), D. humilis (Gordon, 1976), D. pseudotaedatus (Gordon, 1976), D. taedatus (Fall, 1901), D. bigemmeus (Horn, 1895), and D. austrinus (Gordon, 1976). Decadiomus seini Segarra, 2014 is placed as a junior synonym of D. austrinus based on the original type descriptions and illustrations, and a comparison between specimens from Puerto Rico and the type material of D. austrinus.
description: Published as part of Vandenberg, Natalia J. & Hanson, Paul E., 2019, Overview of the lady beetle tribe Diomini (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and description of a new phytophagous, silk-spinning genus from Costa Rica that induces food bodies on leaves of Piper (Piperaceae), pp. 255-285 in Zootaxa 4554 (1) on pages 263-264, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4554.1.9, http://zenodo.org/record/2623565
Dichaina Weise 1923
Creators: name: Vandenberg, Natalia J.
name: Hanson, Paul E.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2019
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Coccinellidae
Dichaina

description: Dichaina Weise, 1923
Dichaina Weise 1923:145. Type species: Dichaina inornata Weise, 1923, by monotypy.
Diagnosis. This monotypic genus is very similar to Diomus, but can be easily distinguished by the sharp submarginal carinae separating the anterolateral pronotal angles from the disc.
description: Published as part of Vandenberg, Natalia J. & Hanson, Paul E., 2019, Overview of the lady beetle tribe Diomini (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and description of a new phytophagous, silk-spinning genus from Costa Rica that induces food bodies on leaves of Piper (Piperaceae), pp. 255-285 in Zootaxa 4554 (1) on page 264, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4554.1.9, http://zenodo.org/record/2623565
Andrzej Slipinski 2007
Creators: name: Vandenberg, Natalia J.
name: Hanson, Paul E.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2019
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Coccinellidae
Andrzej

description: Andrzej Ślipiński, 2007
Andrzej Ślipiński 2007:92. Type species: Andrzej antennatus Ślipiński, 2007, by original designation.
Diagnosis. This monotypic genus is based on a single male specimen that has 11 antennomeres and the terminal antennomere extremely large and elongate (length more than 2× width).
Remarks. In a more recent work by Pang and Ślipiński (2009), another species, Diomus sedani (Blackburn,1889), is diagnosed with similar proportions to the terminal antennomere, although less enlarged overall than that of A. antennatus. Unfortunately, the latter species is known from females only, so characteristics of the male genitalia diagnosed for Andrzej cannot be compared with it. Ślipiński (2007) indicates that the antennal club of A. antennatus consists of a single antennomere; however, we observed that the antennomeres gradually increase in width beginning with antennomere 9, and therefore consider that the last 3 antennomeres together constitute the club.
description: Published as part of Vandenberg, Natalia J. & Hanson, Paul E., 2019, Overview of the lady beetle tribe Diomini (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and description of a new phytophagous, silk-spinning genus from Costa Rica that induces food bodies on leaves of Piper (Piperaceae), pp. 255-285 in Zootaxa 4554 (1) on page 264, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4554.1.9, http://zenodo.org/record/2623565
YASHIL IQTISODIYOT VA TARAQQIYOT
Creators: name: Sherzod Choriyev Toshkent Davlat Iqtisodiyot Universiteti, Iqtisodiyot  fakulteti, I-92 guruh talabasi
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2024

description: Ushbu maqolada “Yashil iqtisodiyot” konsepsiyasining shakllanishi, rivojlanish bosqichlari, “yashil iqtisodiyot”ga oʼtish zaruriyati, omillari, tamoyillari va indikatorlari tahlil etilgan. “Yashil iqtisodiyot”ga oʼtish jarayonini moliyalashtirish, “yashil energetika”ni barqaror rivojlantirish, ekologik siyosat va uni amalga oshirishning iqtisodiy mexanizmi, “yashil iqtisodiyot”ga oʼtishning ustuvor yoʼnalishlari va xorij tajribasi, modellari, Oʼzbekistonda “yashil iqtisodiyot”ga oʼtish strategiyasining maqsadi, vazifalari, rivojlanish bosqichlari va ustuvor yoʼnalishlarining mazmuni bayon etilgan.
Rubus flagellaris Willd. (Willdenow 1809
Creators: name: Van de Beek, Abraham
name: Widrlechner, Mark P.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Plantae
Tracheophyta
Magnoliopsida
Rosales
Rosaceae
Rubus
Rubus flagellaris

description: Rubus flagellaris Willd.
In Enumeratio Plantarum: 549 (Willdenow 1809).
LECTOYPE (designated by Bailey 1923: 159). — B [BW09893010].
FINDINGS
A specimen of Willdenow’s is in herbarium B. Bailey (1943: 247 f) extensively dealt with it and selected it as a type. Because it is not certain that it is the only specimen that Willdenow used, it must be treated as a lectotype (BW09893010).
The type is a good collection, and it is without doubt what is presently conceived under this name, after Bailey’s conclusions (1923: 234; earlier, 1898: 368, he was uncertain about its identity). It is also clear that it is not identical with R. serratus J.F. Gmel. (homotypic synonym of R. villosus Aiton), which is much more densely pubescent and bears stipitate glands.
It is important to note that if the Procumbentes are considered as one species, as Alice et al. (2014) essentially did in their synonymy for R. flagellaris, the correct name of that species becomes R. serratus J.F. Gmel., since its publication predated that of R. flagellaris by 19 years.
description: Published as part of Van de Beek, Abraham & Widrlechner, Mark P., 2021, North American species of Rubus L. (Rosaceae) described from European botanical gardens (1789 - 1823), pp. 1789-1823 in Adansonia (3) (3) 43 (8) on page 83, DOI: 10.5252/adansonia2021v43a8, http://zenodo.org/record/4680762
Rubus argutus Link (Link 1822
Creators: name: Van de Beek, Abraham
name: Widrlechner, Mark P.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Plantae
Tracheophyta
Magnoliopsida
Rosales
Rosaceae
Rubus
Rubus argutus

description: Rubus argutus Link
In Enumeratio plantarum: 62 (Link 1822).
NEOTYPE (here designated). — The photo in Gentes Herbarum 1: 278 (Bailey 1925).
FINDINGS
The original specimens of R. argutus at B have been lost, but Bailey published photos of them (Bailey 1923: 187; 1925: 278; 1945: 619). In his 1923 publication, he printed photos of two specimens, but only one photo was printed in 1925. It was on this specimen that Bailey focused his attention, and in 1945 (Bailey 1945: 619) he selected it as the type. Since the specimen in B has been lost, we select that photo (Bailey 1925: 278) as a replacement type:
Rubus argutus is a blackberry with 3-5 foliolate, small, narrow leaves with jagged serrations, especially within the inflorescence, and fine pedicels. It is common across much of the southeastern United States (Davis et al. 1969b).
description: Published as part of Van de Beek, Abraham & Widrlechner, Mark P., 2021, North American species of Rubus L. (Rosaceae) described from European botanical gardens (1789 - 1823), pp. 1789-1823 in Adansonia (3) (3) 43 (8) on page 88, DOI: 10.5252/adansonia2021v43a8, http://zenodo.org/record/4680762
Rubus enslenii Tratt. (Trattinnick 1823
Creators: name: Van de Beek, Abraham
name: Widrlechner, Mark P.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Plantae
Tracheophyta
Magnoliopsida
Rosales
Rosaceae
Rubus
Rubus enslenii

description: Rubus enslenii Tratt.
(Fig. 10)
In Rosacearum monographia 3: 63 (Trattinnick 1823).
HOLOTYPE. — Enslen, ‘ R. flagellaris W.’, other label: ‘ 1822 I, Rubus trivialis? (Enslenii Tratt.) Amer. bor. Enslen’, W (W0080003).
FINDINGS After reviewing a recent photograph of the type specimen (Fig. 10), we determined that it corresponds well with the interpretation that past American authors (Bailey 1923, 1943; Fernald 1950; Davis et al. 1968b) have given to it. Thus, we have no hesitation in accepting the present identification.
description: Published as part of Van de Beek, Abraham & Widrlechner, Mark P., 2021, North American species of Rubus L. (Rosaceae) described from European botanical gardens (1789 - 1823), pp. 1789-1823 in Adansonia (3) (3) 43 (8) on page 88, DOI: 10.5252/adansonia2021v43a8, http://zenodo.org/record/4680762
Rubus grimesii L. H. Bailey
Creators: name: Van de Beek, Abraham
name: Widrlechner, Mark P.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Plantae
Tracheophyta
Magnoliopsida
Rosales
Rosaceae
Rubus
Rubus grimesii

description: Rubus grimesii L.H. Bailey
(Fig. 12 A-C)
In Gentes Herbarum 2: 331 (Bailey 1932).
LECTOTYPE (here designated). — Step 1: designated by Bailey (1943: 406), 0.5 miles west of Williamsburg, James County, Virginia, L.H. Bailey 36, BH. Since Bailey’s collection 36 was made on two different days; as step 2, herein we choose the eight sheets collected on 16.V.1930, as selected by James L. Reveal, 2013 (BH 000 080 755, BH 000 080 757, BH 000 080 760 [Fig. 12 A-C]; BH 000 080 756, BH 000 080 758, BH 000 080 759, BH 000 080 761, BH 000 080 762).
FINDINGS
The lectotype of R. grimesii bears flowering branches that somewhat resemble those of R. floridus, but they are more curved and the angles at which their inflorescences are held are mostly less acute. In addition, the prickles on their pedicels and inflorescence rachises are finely aciculate, quite unlike the strong, hooked prickles of the R. floridus type.
Since Enslen’s specimen lacks a primocane, any clear information about plant habit, or even details about geography, we cannot determine whether it is determinate side branch from a mounding dewberry (such as R. grimesii), or from an atypical, upright Alleghenienses (perhaps even a rare taxon in that section). Thus, we choose to maintain it as a nomen incertum.
description: Published as part of Van de Beek, Abraham & Widrlechner, Mark P., 2021, North American species of Rubus L. (Rosaceae) described from European botanical gardens (1789 - 1823), pp. 1789-1823 in Adansonia (3) (3) 43 (8) on page 92, DOI: 10.5252/adansonia2021v43a8, http://zenodo.org/record/4680762
Guadana Rheims 2010
Creators: name: Rheims, Cristina A.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Araneae
Sparassidae
Guadana

description: Genus Guadana Rheims, 2010a
Figs 1−57
Guadana Rheims, 2010a: 33 (Type species Guadana manauara Rheims by original designation).
Emended diagnosis. Species of Guadana Rheims resemble those of Sparianthina Banks in having intermarginal denticles arranged in a row; two pairs of ventral spines on tibiae I−II and one lateral spine on each side of metatarsi I−II (see Jäger et al. 2009: figs 10, 33; Rheims 2010a: fig. 7); and male palps with a strong dorsal tegular apophysis (DTA) (Figs 57−66, 94−102); female palp with a long-toothed claw (Jäger et al. 2009: figs 13, 64). They are distinguished from those of the latter genus by the male palps with DTA acutely tapering (Figs 57−66); embolus with basal projection absent or at the prolateral side of the embolus (Figs 67−76) (DTA roundly blunt or distally widened, basal projection at the retrolateral or ventral side of the embolus in Sparianthina) and by the female vulva with glandular projection absent and fertilization ducts short (e.g., Figs 5, 30, 47) (glandular projection present and fertilization ducts long in Sparianthina).
Description. See Rheims (2010a).
Distribution. North and northwestern South America, with records from French Guiana, Brazil, Ecuador and Peru (Figs 81−82).
Composition. Twelve species: Guadana alpahuayo sp. n.; G. amendoin sp. n.; G. arawak sp. n.; G. manauara; G. mapia sp. n.; G. muirapinima sp. n.; G. neblina; G. panguana; G. quillu; G. tambopata; G. ucayali sp. n.; G. urucu.
description: Published as part of Rheims, Cristina A., 2021, The Neotropical genera Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Sparianthina Banks, 1929 (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae), pp. 401-431 in Zootaxa 5061 (3) on page 402, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5061.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5649711
Guadana amendoim Rheims 2021, sp. n.
Creators: name: Rheims, Cristina A.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Araneae
Sparassidae
Guadana
Guadana amendoim

description: Guadana amendoim sp. n.
Figs 15−16, 20−21, 24−25
Type material: Holotype: ♀ from BRAZIL: Acre: Senador Guiomard, Reserva Extrativista de Catuaba [-10.0667, -67.6167], 2002, E. Morato et al. leg. (IBSP 98083). Paratype: 1♀, same data as holotype (IBSP 135243).
Etymology. The specific name means peanut in Portuguese and refers to a traditional festival (Festival do Amendoim) from Senador Guiomard, type locality of the species; noun in apposition.
Diagnosis. Females of G. amendoim sp. n. resemble those of G. alpahuayo sp. n. and G. manauara by the epigyne with MS bearing pair of epigynal pockets (Figs 4, 15, 77). They are distinguished in having the pockets separated and opening posteriorly (Figs 15, 24) (medially connected and opening anteriorly in the latter species). Males are unknown.
Description. Female (holotype): Prosoma pale brownish orange with sub-marginal pale brown stripes and two small irregular pale brown marks at the base of cephalic region; fovea and thoracic striae pale brown; eye borders black. Chelicerae, legs and palps pale orange with small brown spots. Labium brown. Endites pale yellowish-cream, darker at base; sternum pale yellowish-orange with brown margins. Opisthosoma pale gray; dorsally with lighter lateral margins with few whitish guanine spots and two pairs of rounded brown muscle impressions; ventrally with scattered whitish guanine spots and pair of curved lines of muscle impressions; spinnerets pale yellowish orange (Figs 20−21). Total length 7.5. Prosoma: 3.1 long, 3.2 wide. Opisthosoma: 4.2 long, 3.5 wide. Eyes: diameters: 0.17, 0.20, 0.15, 0.22; interdistances: 0.13, 0.06, 0.31, 0.26, 0.27, 0.24. Legs (2143): I: 13.9 (4.0, 1.4, 4.0, 3.3, 1.2); II: 15.6 (4.6, 1.5, 4.5, 3.7, 1.3); III: 11.9 (3.7, 1.2, 3.1, 2.9, 1.0); IV: 12.6 (3.7, 1.0, 3.3, 3.4, 1.2). Epigyne: epigynal field slightly wider than long with lateral muscle attachment bands; MS squared, slightly longer than wide; paired epigynal pockets two times wider than long (Figs 15, 24). Vulva: internal ducts running anteriad from CO then posteriad to SP; SP oval; FD antero-laterad (mating plugs blocking CO)(Figs 16, 25).
Male. Unknown.
Variation. Females (n = 2): total length 7.5−8.2; prosoma length 3.0−3.1.
Distribution. Only known from the type locality in northwestern Brazil (Fig. 81).
description: Published as part of Rheims, Cristina A., 2021, The Neotropical genera Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Sparianthina Banks, 1929 (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae), pp. 401-431 in Zootaxa 5061 (3) on page 407, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5061.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5649711
Guadana arawak Rheims 2021, sp. n.
Creators: name: Rheims, Cristina A.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Araneae
Sparassidae
Guadana
Guadana arawak

description: Guadana arawak sp. n.
Figs 17−19, 22−23, 26−28, 58, 68
Type material: Holotype: ♂ from FRENCH GUIANA: Regina Commune: Nouragues National Reserve (Research Station) (4.0833, -52.6667), 5 May 2010, V. Vedel leg. (MNHN).
Etymology. The specific name refers to the Arawak Indians, the first people known to inhabit French Guiana; noun in apposition.
Diagnosis. Males of G. arawak sp. n. resemble those of G. alpahuayo sp. n. by the palps with embolus bearing a subdistal keel at tip (Figs. 67−68) and dRTA barely reaching the proximal margin of the alveolus (Figs 2, 18). They are distinguished from those of the latter species by the basal projection with jagged margin (smooth in the other species) (Figs 18, 68). Females are unknown.
Description. Male (holotype): prosoma pale brownish orange; cephalic region with three longitudinal, pale brown stripes running from posterior eyes to fovea; thoracic region with pale brown marks laterally; fovea and thoracic striae brown; eye borders black; clypeus pale yellow with dark brown antero-lateral margins. Chelicerae pale yellow with rounded brown proximal marks. Legs and palps pale brownish yellow with brown spots at the base of spines. Labium and endites pale brownish-orange at base, distally pale yellow. Sternum pale yellowish cream colored with brown margins. Opisthosoma pale yellow with no distinctive pattern; dorsally with two large, oval muscle impressions; ventrally with pair of curved lines of muscle impressions (Figs 22−23). Total length 6.1. Prosoma: 2.8 long, 2.8 wide. Opisthosoma: 3.1 long, 2.3 wide. Eyes: diameters: 0.18, 0.20, 0.16, 0.22; interdistances: 0.10, 0.02, 0.26, 0.22, 0.20, 0.18. Legs (2143): I: 19.8 (5.2, 1.5, 5.8, 5.3, 2.0); II: 21.4 (5.6, 1.5, 6.3, 6.0, 2.0); III: 14.1 (3.9, 1.1, 3.9, 3.9, 1.3); IV: 16.4 (4.3, 1.1, 4.4, 4.9, 1.7). Palp: vRTA triangular, similar in size to dRTA; dRTA distally bifid, with one branch tappering and the other laminar; DTA sinuous in ventral view, subdistally curved retrolaterally; conductor hyaline, same width throughout the entire length; embolus strongly curved prolaterally (Figs 17−19, 26−28, 58, 68).
Female: unknown.
Distribution. Only known from the type locality in the French Guiana (Fig. 81).
description: Published as part of Rheims, Cristina A., 2021, The Neotropical genera Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Sparianthina Banks, 1929 (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae), pp. 401-431 in Zootaxa 5061 (3) on pages 407-411, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5061.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5649711
Guadana mapia Rheims 2021, sp. n.
Creators: name: Rheims, Cristina A.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Araneae
Sparassidae
Guadana
Guadana mapia

description: Guadana mapia sp. n.
Figs 29−30, 34−35, 38−39
Type material: Holotype: ♀ from BRAZIL: Amazonas: Borba, Rio Mapiá [-4.3833, -59.5833], 22 April 1996, Equipe IBSP / SMNK leg. (IBSP 8825).
Etymology. The specific name refers to the type locality; noun in apposition.
Diagnosis. Females of S. mapia sp. n. resemble those of S. muirapinima sp. n. and S. urucu by the epigyne with MS bearing a single anterior epigynal pocket (Figs 29, 46, 79). They are distinguished from those of S. muirapinima sp. n. by the pocket as wide as long (much wider than long in the latter species) and from S. urucu by the median septum roughly rectangular, with sinuous lateral margins (roughly trapezoid in the latter species) (Fig. 29). Males are unknown.
Description. Female (holotype): Prosoma pale brownish yellow with irregular brown marks between thoracic striae and at the base of cephalic region; fovea and thoracic striae brown; eye borders black. Chelicerae, legs and palps yellowish orange with faint pale brown marks at the base of spines and setae. Labium brown, distally orange brown. Endites yellowish cream colored, Sternum yellowish cream colored with brown margins. Opisthosoma dorsally brownish yellow with gray marks around pale heart mark and one pair of brown muscle impressions; ventrally brownish cream colored with two curved lines of muscle impressions. Spinnerets pale yellow (Figs 34−35). Total length 6.8. Prosoma: 3.1 long, 3.2 wide. Opisthosoma: 3.6 long, 2.7 wide. Eyes: diameters: 0.19, 0.24, 0.17, 0.25; interdistances: 0.15, 0.05, 0.32, 0.30, 0.29, 0.30. Legs (2143): I: 16.6 (4.7, 1.5, 4.9, 4.0, 1.5); II: 18.6 (5.3, 1.7, 5.6, 4.5, 1.5); III: 13.2 (4.0, 1.0, 3.6, 3.3, 1.3); IV: 14.5 (4.3, 1.1, 3.8, 3.8, 1.5). Epigyne: epigynal field longer than wide; anterior epigynal pocket wider than long, opening posteriorly; MS longer than wide (Figs 29, 38). Vulva: internal ducts sinuous, running posteriad; SP u-shaped; FD short, anteriad (Figs 30, 39).
Male. Unknown.
Distribution. Only known from the type locality in northern Brazil (Fig. 81).
description: Published as part of Rheims, Cristina A., 2021, The Neotropical genera Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Sparianthina Banks, 1929 (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae), pp. 401-431 in Zootaxa 5061 (3) on page 411, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5061.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5649711
Guadana ucayali Rheims 2021, sp. n.
Creators: name: Rheims, Cristina A.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Araneae
Sparassidae
Guadana
Guadana ucayali

description: Guadana ucayali sp. n.
Figs 31−33, 36−37, 40−42, 65, 72
Type material. Holotype: ♂ from PERU: Loreto: Jenaro Herrera Province, Requena District, Centro de Investigaciones Jenaro Herrera (04°53’39.9”S, 73°39’01.9”W), 2 April 2013, C.A. Rheims & R. P. Indicatti leg. (MUSM).
Etymology. The specific name refers to Ucayali River, where the type locality is located; noun in apposition.
Diagnosis. Males of S. ucayali sp n. resemble those of S. urucu by the palp with conductor distally widened (Fig. 32, Rheims 2010a: figs 34−35). They are distinguished from the latter species by the dRTA bearing two thornlike projections at tip (dRTA with single, hooked-shaped projection in S. urucu) and by the embolus with basal projection partly membranous (all sclerotized in S. urucu) (Figs 23, 41). Females are unknown.
Description. Male (holotype): Prosoma pale yellow with grayish black margins and marks between thoracic striae and two orange brown marks at the base of cephalic region extending towards PLE; margins flanked by long, black, needle-like setae; fovea and thoracic striae orange brown; eye area slightly more orange than rest of prosoma; eye borders black; clypeus pale yellow. Chelicerae pale yellow with pair of grayish black marks at base. Legs pale yellow with small grayish black spots at the base of setae and larger round marks at the base of spines. Palps pale yellow with round, grayish black marks at the base of femoral spines. Sternum cream colored with pale brown margins. Endites cream colored. Labium orange, distally cream colored. Opisthosoma pale gray. Dorsally with pair of round, muscular impressions on posterior half, white spots laterally and covered by orange setae. Ventrally with white spots laterally (Figs 36−37). Total length 6.0. Prosoma: 2.7 long, 2.8 wide. Opisthosoma: 3.2 long, 2.4 wide. Eyes: diameters: 0.18, 0.22, 0.16, 0.22; interdistances: 0.10, 0.02, 0.26, 0.26, 0.26, 0.26. Legs (2143): I: 23.6 (6.1, 1.6, 6.9, 6.5, 2.5); II: 26.0 (6.7, 1.7, 7.6, 7.5, 2.5); III: 16.3 (4.6, 1.2, 4.4, 4.5, 1.6); IV: 18.7 (5.0, 1.1, 4.8, 5.7, 2.1). Palp: vRTA small, triangular; dRTA laminar; DTA abruptly narrowed and curved at tip; conductor hyaline; embolus filiform, strongly curved prolaterally, with basal projection with pointed tip (Figs 31−33, 40−42, 65, 72).
Female. Unknown.
Distribution. Only known from the type locality in Peru (Fig. 82).
description: Published as part of Rheims, Cristina A., 2021, The Neotropical genera Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Sparianthina Banks, 1929 (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae), pp. 401-431 in Zootaxa 5061 (3) on pages 419-420, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5061.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5649711
Sparianthina Banks 1929
Creators: name: Rheims, Cristina A.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Araneae
Sparassidae
Sparianthina

description: Genus Sparianthina Banks, 1929
Sparianthina Banks, 1929: 80 (Type species Sparianthina selenopoides Banks by original designation).
Emended diagnosis. Species of Sparianthina resemble those of Guadana in having intermarginal denticles arranged in a row; two pairs of ventral spines on tibiae I−II and one lateral spine on each side of metatarsi I−II (see Jäger et al. 2009: figs 10, 33; Rheims 2010a: fig. 7); male palps with a strong dorsal tegular apophysis (DTA) (Figs 57−66, 94−102); and female palps with a long-toothed claw (Jäger et al. 2009: figs 13, 64). Males are distinguished from those of the latter genus by the palps with DTA roundly blunt, bifid, or widened at tip (Figs 94−102); and embolus with basal projection at the retrolateral or ventral side of the embolus (Figs 103−111) (DTA acutely tapering and embolus with basal projection absent or at the prolateral side of the embolus in Guadana). Females are distinguished by the epigyne with median septum smooth, without ledges or pockets (Figs 83, 112−116) (present in Guadana) and vulva bearing glandular projection and fertilization ducts long (Fig. 84; Jäger et al. 2009: figs 15, 29, 59; Rheims 2011: figs 5, 13) (glandular projection absent and fertilization ducts short in Guadana).
Distribution. Southern Central America and Northern South America, with records in Costa Rica, Panamá, Colombia, Venezuela and Trinidad & Tobago (Figs 117−118).
Composition. Ten species: Sparianthina adisi; S. boyaca sp. nov.; S. deltshevi; S. gaita; S. milleri; S. parang; S. pumilla; S. saaristoi; S. selenopoides; S. soca sp. nov.
description: Published as part of Rheims, Cristina A., 2021, The Neotropical genera Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Sparianthina Banks, 1929 (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae), pp. 401-431 in Zootaxa 5061 (3) on pages 421-422, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5061.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5649711
Sparianthina boyaca Rheims 2021, sp. n.
Creators: name: Rheims, Cristina A.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arachnida
Araneae
Sparassidae
Sparianthina
Sparianthina boyaca

description: Sparianthina boyaca sp. n.
Figs 83−85
Type material: Holotype: ♀ from COLOMBIA: Boyacá: [4.6776, -74.1485], between Alto Belen and San Jose, 23 September 1985, J. Sturm leg. (MCZ 46472).
Etymology. The specific name refers to the type locality; noun in apposition.
Diagnosis. Females of S. boyaca sp. n. resemble those of S. gaita, S. parang and S selenopoides by the presence of an anterior, transversal furrow on the epigyne (Figs 83, 112, 114, 116). They are distinguished from S. gaita by the presence of an anterior atrium bearing the CO (absent in the latter species) and from S. parang and S. selenopoides by the lateral lobes completely separated by the MS (Fig. 83) (touching each other posteriorly in S. parang and medially in S. selenopoides).
Description. Female (holotype): Prosoma brownish orange with dark brown margins and brown marks along thoracic striae, lateral margins of cephalic region and extending posteriorly from between PME; fovea brown; eye borders black. Chelicerae and palps brownish orange. Legs brownish orange with large pale brown spots at the base of spines. Labium pale brownish orange, distally cream colored. Endites pale yellowish cream, distally cream colored. Sternum pale yellow with pale orange margins. Opisthosoma cream colored with no distinctive pattern; dorsally with two pairs of round brown muscle impressions; ventrally with two slightly curved lines of muscle impressions. Spinnerets yellowish-cream colored. Total length 10.9. Prosoma: 3.8 long, 3.5 wide. Opisthosoma: 6.8 long, 5.1 wide. Eyes: diameters: 0.20, 0.26, 0.20, 0.26; interdistances: 0.10, 0.06, 0.30, 0.28, 0.22, 0.20. Legs (2143): I: 13.7 (3.8, 1.8, 3.6, 3.2, 1.3); II: 14.8 (4.4, 1.8, 3.9, 3.4, 1.3); III: 12.0 (3.7, 1.4, 3.0, 2.8, 1.1); IV: 13.5 (4.0, 1.4, 3.3, 3.5, 1.3). Epigyne: epigynal field longer than wide; lateral lobes running parallel and diverging posteriorly; anterior atrium oval, wider than long (Fig. 83). Vulva: internal ducts strongly convoluted; glandular projection small, rounded, close to CO; SP elongated, curved anteriorly; FD long, curved, antero-laterad (Figs 84−85).
Male. Unknown.
Distribution. Only known from the type locality in Colombia (Fig. 117).
description: Published as part of Rheims, Cristina A., 2021, The Neotropical genera Guadana Rheims, 2010 and Sparianthina Banks, 1929 (Araneae: Sparassidae: Heteropodinae), pp. 401-431 in Zootaxa 5061 (3) on pages 422-426, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5061.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5649711