Nanotermitodius andersoni Skelley, Smith, & Mora-Aguilar 2022, new species
Creators: name: Skelley, Paul E.
name: Smith, Andrew B. T.
name: Mora-Aguilar, Eder F.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2022
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Aphodiidae
Nanotermitodius
Nanotermitodius andersoni

description: Nanotermitodius andersoni Skelley, Smith, & Mora-Aguilar, new species
Figures 1–3, 7–9, 11–16
Type material (total 243). Holotype male and allotype female (CMNC) label data: “ MEXICO: Oaxaca / Plan de Guadalupe, 2548m / 18.13214 -96.96790 / 10 Jun 2016, / R.S. Anderson 2016-123 / cloud forest litter”. Holotype with identification label: “[red paper] HOLOTYPE ♂ / Nanotermitodius / andersoni Skelley, / Smith & MoraAguilar”. Allotype with identification label: “[blue paper] ALLOTYPE ♀ / Nanotermitodius / andersoni Skelley, / Smith & Mora-Aguilar”.
Additional paratypes (244) with yellow identification labels lacking sex symbols, label data: MEXICO: Oaxaca: Agua de Hueso, 1915m, 18.14653, -96.79340, 15-VI-2016, R.S. Anderson, 2016-153, scrubby cloud forest litter (3♂♂ CMNC); Agua de Tierra, 1886m, 18.14458, -96.79798, 15-VI-2016, R.S. Anderson, 2016- 154, liquidambar forest litter (23♂♂, 10♀♀ CMNC; 2♂♂, 2♀♀ FSCA); 3 km NW Ayautla, 1460m, 18.05369, -96.69192 ± 20m, 14-VI-2016, Longino et al. cols, secondary wet forest, ex sifted leaf litter (1♀ CEMT; 3♂♂, 2♀♀ EMAC); Same locality, 1320m, 18.05175, -96.69096 ± 20m, 14-VI-2016, Longino et al cols., secondary wet forest, ex sifted leaf litter (1♀ EMAC); above Café Carlota, 1459m, 18.05367, -96.69183, 14-VI-2016, R.S. Anderson, 2016-149, mixed hardwood forest litter (1♂, 1♀ CMNC); Same locality, 1508m, 18.05419, -96.69207, 14-VI-2016, R.S. Anderson, 2016-150, mixed hardwood forest litter (2♂♂ CMNC); Same locality, 1604m, 18.05532, -96.69239, 14-VI-2016, R.S. Anderson, 2016-151, mixed hardwood forest litter (1♀ CMNC); 5 km ENE Huautla, 1890m, 18.14453, -96.79799, 15-VI-2016, Project ADMAC, Wm-F-04-2-02, ex sifted liquidambar litter (24♂♂, 7♀♀: CMNC; 2♂♂ 2♀♀ FSCA); Plan de Guadalupe, 2548m, 18.13214, -96.96790, 10-VI-2016, R.S. Anderson, 2016- 123, cloud forest litter (HT ♂, AT ♀, 1 disarticulated ♂, 1♂, 3♀♀ CMNC; 2♂♂, 2♀♀ FSCA; 1♂, 1♀ IEXA); Same locality, 2502m, 18.13369, -96.96642, 10-VI-2016, R.S. Anderson, 2016-124, oak forest litter (2♂♂, 2♀♀ CMNC); Same locality, 2442m, 18.13551, -96.96453, 10-VI-2016, M Barrios-Izás, MBI-666, hojarasca, bosque nuboso (5♂♂, 4♀♀ CMNC; 1♂, 1♀ CNIN; 1♂, 1♀ CZUG; 2♂♂, 2♀♀ NHML; 3♂♂, 3♀♀ UNSM) [1♂ with additional orange paper label: “DNA VOUCHER / P585 2018 / MJ Paulsen-UNSM”]; Same locality, 2494m, 18.13401, - 96.96612, 10-VI-2016, M Barrios-Izás, MBI-667, hojarasca, bosque nuboso (3♂♂, 2♀♀ CMNC; 2♂♂, 2♀♀ FSCA); Same locality, 2468m, 18.13559, -96.96377, 10-VI-2016, M Barrios-Izás, MBI-668, hojarasca, bosque encino (5♂♂, 4♀♀: CMNC; 1♂, 1♀ CASC; 1♂, 1♀ MCZC); Same locality, 2392m, 18.13672, -96.96228, 10- VI-2016, M Barrios-Izás, MBI-669, hojarasca, bosque nuboso (2♂♂, 2♀♀ CMNC); Same locality, Hwy 182, Km 38-39, 2516m, 18.13688, -96.96202 ± 20m, 9-VI-2016, L. R. Benavides, #LRB-MX021, oak forest, ex sifted leaf litter (1♂, 1♀ CMNC); Puerto de la Soledad, Hwy 182, km 28, 2366m, 18.16280, -96.99669, 10-VI-2016, R.S. Anderson, 2016-125, cloud forest litter (1♀ CMNC); Same locality, Hwy 182, km 28, 2370m, 18.16306, -96.99693, 10-VI-2016, R.S. Anderson, 2016-126, cloud forest litter (3♂♂, 5♀♀ CMNC); Same locality, Hwy 182, km 24, 2241m, 18.17548, -97.00745, 11-VI-2016, R.S. Anderson, 2016-127, oak-pine forest litter (4♂♂, 1♀ CMNC); Same locality, Hwy 182, km 26, 2320m, 18.17470, -97.00205, 11-VI-2016, R.S. Anderson, 2016-130, cloud forest litter (1♀ CMNC); Same locality, Hwy 182, km 27, 2319m, 18.16911, -97.00181, 11-VI-2016, R.S. Anderson, 2016-131, open oak forest litter (11♂♂, 16♀♀ CMNC; 2♂♂, 2♀♀ EMAC; 1♂, 1♀ FSCA; 1♂, 1♀ IEXA; 1♂, 1♀ USNM); Same locality, 2381m, 18.16364, -96.99763, 11-VI-2016, R.S. Anderson, 2016-132, cloud forest litter (2♀♀ CMNC); Same locality, 2388m, 18.16275, -96.99771, 11-VI-2016, R.S. Anderson, 2016-133, cloud forest litter (2♂♂ CMNC); Same locality, 2396m, 18.16181, -96.99776, 13-VI-2016, R.S. Anderson, 2016-139, cloud/ oak/podocarpus forest litter (1♂ CEMT; 4♂♂, 2♀♀ CMNC; 3♂♂, 1♀ FSCA); Same locality, Hwy 182, km 30, 2369m, “18.16307003, -96.996851” [correct coordinates 18.15307003, -96.986851], 9-VI-2016, L.R. Benavides, LRB-MX-022, oak forest litter sample (1♂ CMNC); Same locality, Hwy 182, km24, 2198m, 18.17487, -97.00661, 11-VI-2016, M Barrios-Izás, MBI-674, hojarasca, bosque encino (6♂♂, 2♀♀ CMNC); Same locality, Hwy 182, km26, 2343m, 18.17465, -97.00138, 11-VI-2016, M Barrios-Izás, MBI-675, hojarasca, bosque encino (2♂♂, 3♀♀ CMNC; 2♂♂, 2♀♀ FSCA); Same locality, Hwy 182, km27, 2299m, 18.16893, -97.0024, 11-VI-2016, M BarriosIzás, MBI-677, hojarasca, bosque encino (3♂♂, 3♀♀ CMNC).
Additional material. One other data point is known for a non-paratype. Galante et al. (2003: 305, fig. 17; 309) illustrate a specimen of this species, misidentified as “ Termitodius chaki Reyes and Martinez ” with label data: “ Oaxaca (new state record): 26 km E Teotitlan del Camino, 2250 m, 26.IX.1990, R. BARANOWSKI”.
Diagnosis. Body of moderate size, length 3.52–4.07 mm, pronotum quadrate, pronotal lateral margin weakly sinuate, longer elytra (almost 2 times length of pronotum), which are parallel-sided having straighter costae, flight wings vestigial.
Description. Male holotype (Figs. 1–3). Body length 4.07 mm, greatest width 1.56 mm. Dorsum dark reddish brown nearly black with head, pronotal lobes, and legs tinged with brown; shape elongate, almost parallel sided.
Head. Head one-third wider than long, surface dulled, punctures with short setae (Fig. 11); clypeus anteriorly with inflexed, flattened margin bearing short setal fringe, lower edge medially sharply, obtusely angulate, upper edge with weakly inflexed margin smoothly to angulate tooth adjacent to rounded edge of gena; clypeocentral disc defined anteriorly by U-shaped groove (peridiscal impression), and posteriorly by arcuate suture, center of disc with 2 small, longitudinal tubercles. Vertex with 4 short, longitudinal carinae, each with a short tuft of erect setae (best seen in profile), 2 frontodiscal costae slightly closer and with shallow groove between. Gena anteriorly lobed, posteriorly depressed above eye, eye greatly reduced (compare Figs. 9–10), not visible dorsally. Mouthparts not notably different from other recently described rhyparines; epipharynx with anterior margin deeply concave (Fig. 13). Pronotum. Pronotum as wide as long, with 6 irregularly longitudinal carinae; paramedian costa complete and slightly convergent in anterior half, discolateral costa interrupted in anterior third by deep irregular pit, parts anterior to pits slightly more elevated and wider than posterior part, which is weakly elevated; submarginal costa outwardly sinuate near middle with adjacent deep, mesad depression; all costae extending to posterior pronotal margin; surface of intervals between paramedian and discolateral costae strongly punctate anteriorly, nearly impunctate and dulled posteriorly; surface of interval between discolateral and submarginal costa coarsely punctate entire length; pronotal punctures bearing short setae; lateral margin of pronotum sinuate with 2 week lobes, equally prominent laterally, anterior lobe elongate forward of equal length to intermediate lobe, which grades smoothly to posterior angle of pronotum; anterior pronotal margin tomentose, lateral posterior margins lacking marginal bead. Scutellum. Scutellar shield minute, narrow, apex acute. Elytra. Elytron almost 2 times length of pronotum; with 4 elevated carinae; discomedian costa depressed near middle of elytron, highest in apical third anterior to bulbous area; discolateral costa sinuate, more elevated than discomedial costa, highest points just at middle and near apex, near apex costa curves inwardly to trichome; discomedial and discolateral costa ending posteriorly with tuft of setae over trichomes occupying depression just anterior to bulbous apex; posthumeral costa elevated anteriorly, weakly sinuate, gradually reducing in height and width towards apex, indistinct when reaching caudal trichome; submarginal costa dorsally sinuate, sharply turns inward and upward at elytral apex merging with caudal bulb; caudal bulb transverse in dorsal view, narrow and vertical in caudal view (Fig. 12), most pronounced near suture; all costae dorsally with 1 or 2 rows of minute setae; elytral intervals with coarse, deep seta bearing punctures; interval between juxtasutural and discomedian costa and interval between posthumeral and submarginal costa with 1 row of punctures; intervals between discomedian-discolateral-posthumeral costae with 2 rows of punctures. Flight wings. Metathoracic wings vestigial, reduced to buds (Fig. 8), species flightless, elytra fused. Ventral thorax. Preprosternal apophysis medially broadly lanceolate anterior to coxae; postprosternal apophysis haustate. Mesoventrite short, surface densely punctate; medially with longitudinal, tomentose-ringed groove. Metaventrite with narrow, anterior metasternal projection separating mesocoxae; posterior of process with large, deep, medial impression, with small medial and larger triangular lateral impression just behind mesocoxa, discal area with a large 2-part impression. Abdomen. Abdomen with 5 visible sternites, first 4 narrow, slightly wider laterally; first ventrite medially with oval concavity, laterally with large cavity occupying most of metacoxal length; next 3 ventrites with small depression on each side near lateral edge, otherwise, convex; apical ventrite approximately as long as adjacent 3 sternites combined, basal two-thirds with deep transverse depression on each side of median ridge; apical third of last ventrite convex, surface with numerous recumbent setae, bearing a small medial tubercule. Pygidium flattened, apical threefourths outlined by distinct ridge, basal portion above ridge finely setose with distinct median longitudinal sulcus, below sulcus in flattened area midline carinate, smooth on each side; apex of pygidium rounded. Legs. Ventral surfaces of all femora irregularly punctate-setose, profemur robust with tooth medially on anterior margin, meso- and metatibia narrow; meso- and metafemur with a weakly defined area for tibia. Protibia with broad apical margin distinctly tridentate, each tooth sharply angulate, medial tooth projecting inwardly. Mesotibia gradually expanded to truncate apex, sinuate inner margin with dense fringe of setae along apical third, distinct sharp tooth on inner apical edge directed inwardly (Fig. 8); apical fringe of spinules short, complete. Metatibia gradually widening to apex, inner apical angle extended approximately one-third length of basal tarsomere as an acute tooth (Fig. 8); apical fringe of spinules short, complete. Protarsus short, length of basal tarsomere equal to next 2 combined. Mesotarsus narrow, half as long as tibia; basal tarsomere as long as next 3 combined. Metatarsus narrow, half as long as tibia; basal tarsomere as long as rest of tarsus. Genitalia. Male genitalia slender, tubular, gradually curved; phallobase 4.8 times longer than parameres; parameres short, triangular, rounded apically (Figs. 14–15).
Female allotype. Body length 3.89 mm, width 1.52 mm. Similar to male, showing dimorphisms in tibiae and abdomen. Profemur lacking tooth medially on anterior margin. Protibia with 2 apical teeth, medial and outer angle, inner tooth of male obsolete. Meso- and metatibia gradually expanded to apex, lacking sinuate inner margin and apical teeth (Fig. 7). Abdomen with last ventrite convex, with small basal depressions and lacking small medial tubercle on apex.
Variation. Body length 3.52–4.07 mm, width 1.33–1.56 mm. Much subtle variation was observed, that was not sexually dimorphic, which includes the following. Head with clypeal teeth and minute tuft of setae on frontodiscal costa of head varying from present to absent. This is easily attributed to apparent wear on older specimens, as many have those surfaces abraded. Pronotum with shape quadrate or appearing longer than wide, but measuring quadrate; coarse punctation between paramedian costa always present on anterior half of surface, varying from few to numerous punctures in posterior half; number, size and distinctness of surface punctures variable; lateral margin varied from weakly to distinctly sinuate (never deeply sinuate); posterior lobe of lateral margin varies from small and flatly rounded to somewhat dentate. Elytra with lateral margin varying from nearly parallel sided to distinctly arcuate-sinuate; discomedian costa with median section absent to reduced but distinct; discolateral costa curvature and height being weakly to more strongly sinuate; submarginal costa with angulate or rounded caudal end as curving into caudal bulb; intervals between costa with puncture size varying from distinctly separated to almost coalescing. Metaventrite median fovea varied from sharply or roundly edged, edged arcuate to somewhat sinuate; general shape from wider anteriorly to almost rectangular to evenly oval; discal foveae on each side a series of 2–3 large foveae or a single crescent shaped fovea. Protibial teeth abraded in many, thus more-or-less distinctly dentate based on age and wear.
Etymology. Named for Robert S. Anderson, a weevil expert who works with high elevation, often flightless weevils. His primary collecting technique is use of Berlese or Winkler extractors on sifted leaf litter. He collected the large number of specimens studied here, or helped lead different projects (e.g., Leaf Litter Arthropods of MesoAmerica, LLAMA) that produced these and many other interesting rhyparines.
Natural history. Immature stages and host relations are unknown.Adults are found in litter. The species inhabits cloud forest, scrubby cloud forest, oak forest, oak-pine forest, mixed hardwood forest, secondary vegetation related to this vegetation, some cloud forest locations are dominated by Liquidambar L. (Altingiaceae) or Podocarpus Labill. (Podocarpaceae).
Distribution. Known only in Sierra Mazateca, Oaxaca, Mexico, at an elevation of 1320–2550 m (Fig. 16).
Comments. Robert S. Anderson (personal communication, 12 October 2021) suggested each of the separate areas where these were collected may have a different species, as he observes in the flightless weevil fauna. Specimens of Nanotermitodius were sorted by locality, then males were dissected from each area and many comparisons were made. Some variations were observed in many characters as noted in the Variation section. In the available series, some variations seemed more prevalent within one population compared to another. However, a corollary of our species concept is the ability to identify a species without knowing where it was collected. These variations show much overlap between localities. None of the variations observed could be definitively associated with a single area. Having large series allowed us to avoid over description of populations based on subtle differences. More new data may show otherwise. For now, we deem it best to consider these a single species.
Discussion. Oaxaca is one of the most diverse territories in Mexico, almost 10% of the state’s flora and fauna are endemic. Nine monospecific genera and more than 700 species of vascular plants and more than 130 species of vertebrates are restricted to this state, most of them in the cloud forests and oak forests of the Oaxacan Highlands (García-Mendoza 2004; González-Pérez et al. 2004).For highly studied insects with stable taxonomy, the information has been compiled. For example, butterflies have 29 endemic Oaxacan taxa (Luis-Martínez et al. 2004). However, this pattern shown in plants and vertebrates should be similar or have higher values for various groups of insects as has been recorded in some Oaxacan regions such as Chimalapas (Mora-Aguilar & Delgado 2019b).
The Oaxacan Highlands are known as one of the most diverse areas in Mexico (González-Pérez et al. 2004), and biogeographically have been considered as part of the Orizaba-Zempoaltépec district in the East Subprovince and Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt Province (Morrone 2020). Some species of beetles, such as Cyclocephala mesophylla Mora-Aguilar & Delgado, 2012 and Chrysina victorina (Hope, 1840) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) (MoraAguilar & Delgado 2012; Mora-Aguilar et al. 2018), support this pattern. Nevertheless, this area is historically and topographically conformed by the Sierra Mazateca, Sierra de Juárez, and Nudo de Zempoaltépetl. The Sierra Mazateca has been more related with the Sierra Madre Oriental than to Sierra de Juárez and Nudo de Zempoaltépetl in separate parsimony analyses using vascular plants and vertebrates (Luna et al. 1999; León-Paniagua & Morrone 2009).
Additional factors such as separation of the two mountain masses (Sierra Mazatec and Sierra de Juárez) by the lowlands of the Cañón de Tecomavaca and Río Santo Domingo, which act as geographic barriers, along with biological, climatical, topographical, geological, and geomorphological differences (Luna et al. 1999; CentenoGarcía 2004; León-Paniagua & Morrone 2009), vagility limitations and the possible association with ant or termites, support this theory and the restricted distribution of this species.
description: Published as part of Skelley, Paul E., Smith, Andrew B. T. & Mora-Aguilar, Eder F., 2022, A review of the flightless genus Nanotermitodius Howden, 2003 (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae: Rhyparini), pp. 355-364 in Zootaxa 5200 (4) on pages 356-360, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5200.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/7270716