Capsaloides hoffmannae Lamothe-Argumedo 1996
Creators: name: Chisholm, Leslie A.
name: Whittington, Ian D.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2006
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Platyhelminthes
Monogenea
Capsalidea
Capsalidae
Capsaloides
Capsaloides hoffmannae

description: Capsaloides hoffmannae Lamothe­Argumedo, 1996 (Figs 1 C, 2C)
Type­host: Tetrapterus audax (Philippi, 1887) (Istiophoridae).
Type­locality: Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico [Pacific Ocean].
Site: Gills.
Specimens examined: One paratype (CNHE 002718).
Remarks
The key of Lamothe­Argumedo (1996) distinguishes C. hoffmannae from most other members of Capsaloides by the ratio of the haptor diameter to total body length between 1.2 to 1.3. He states that the haptor diameter/total body length ratio is similar for C. magnaspinosus. Based on this finding Lamothe­Argumedo (1996) subsequently goes on to distinguish between these 2 species to the exclusion of the other species in Capsaloides. Using ratios of soft body measurements to distinguish between species is fraught with problems since they depend of the method of fixation and subsequent preparation (i.e. flattened versus unflattened). Lamothe­Argumedo (1996) does not state how the specimens of C. hoffmannae were prepared but the paratype is not strongly flattened and as such, the sinuations are close together making the surface appear annulated (Fig. 2 C). We also do not know if the haptoral diameter/total body length ratio given by Lamothe­ Argumedo (1996) for C. magnaspinosus was from type­material or from the drawing of Price (1939).
Capsaloides hoffmannae was described from the same host species as C. sinuatus and C. hoffmannae is very similar to C. cristatus and C. sinuatus; these latter 2 species, as we discussed above, may be synonymous. Comparison of the morphology of the haptoral accessory sclerites of C. hoffmannae to those of other species is difficult because they are not completely flattened in a dorsoventral plane. The haptoral accessory sclerites of C. hoffmannae (Fig. 1 C) are considerably shorter than those of C. cristatus (Fig. 1 B) and C. sinuatus (Fig. 1 G). However, length of the haptoral accessory sclerites may increase as the parasite grows like other capsalids (e.g. Kearn 1990). The dorsomarginal body sclerites (Fig. 2 C) have 15–20 cusps. The left isolated anterior group of dorsomarginal body sclerites could not be seen in the paratype but the illustration of Lamothe­Argumedo (1996) depicts 5 sclerites. The presence of a right anterior group of dorsomarginal body sclerites was not noted by Lamothe­Argumedo (1996) and could not be seen in the paratype examined by us. The annulated body margin of C. hoffmannae closely resembles that of the unflattened voucher specimen of C. cristatus adding further support to our view that C. hoffmannae may be an invalid taxon and together with C. cristatus, may be synonymous with C. sinuatus. However, we refrain from making this decision until more material is available.
description: Published as part of Chisholm, Leslie A. & Whittington, Ian D., 2006, Revision of Capsaloides (Monogenea: Capsalidae) with a redescription of C. magnaspinosus Price, 1939 from the nasal tissue of Tetrapterus audax (Istiophoridae) collected off Nelson Bay, New South Wales, Australia, pp. 1-20 in Zootaxa 1160 on pages 7-8, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.172308