VAFB-2011-10: Identification of Historic Properties and Assessment of Adverse Effects: K1, K4, K6, K7, and K8 Feeder Line Replacement Project, Vandenberg Air Force Base, Santa Barbara County, California
Creators: name: Brasket, Kelli S
Publisher: name: 30 CES/CEIEA, Vandenberg Air Force Base
Year: 2011
Subjects: subject: Vandenberg Air Force Base
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/47649/vandenberg-air-force-base
subject: California
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/71/california
subject: Santa Barbara
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/10938/santa-barbara
subject: CA-SBA-1940
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/118286/ca-sba-1940
subject: CA-SBA-931
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/92924/ca-sba-931
subject: CA-SBA-927H
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/118528/ca-sba-927h
subject: CA-SBA-923
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/118527/ca-sba-923
subject: CA-SBA-2412
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/118530/ca-sba-2412
subject: CA-SBA-1130
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/118529/ca-sba-1130
subject: CA-SBA-2829
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/118532/ca-sba-2829
subject: CA-SBA-2446
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/118531/ca-sba-2446
subject: CA-SBA-550
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/93030/ca-sba-550
subject: CA-SBA-2834
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/118534/ca-sba-2834
subject: CA-SBA-2831
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/118533/ca-sba-2831
subject: CA-SBA-2941
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/118536/ca-sba-2941
subject: CA-SBA-2836
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/118535/ca-sba-2836
subject: CA-SBA-2952
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/118538/ca-sba-2952
subject: CA-SBA-2946H
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/118537/ca-sba-2946h
subject: CA-SBA-4009H
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/118540/ca-sba-4009h
subject: CA-SBA-3107H
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/118539/ca-sba-3107h
subject: Archaeological Feature
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/339/archaeological-feature
subject: Chipped Stone
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/2/chipped-stone
subject: Fauna
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/4/fauna
subject: Replacement
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/other-keyword/165732/replacement
subject: Environment Research
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/13/environment-research
subject: Ethnographic Research
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/14/ethnographic-research
subject: Archaeological Overview
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/1/archaeological-overview
subject: Historic Background Research
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/18/historic-background-research
subject: Records Search / Inventory Checking
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/8/records-search-inventory-checking
subject: Site Evaluation / Testing
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/10/site-evaluation-testing

description: This document is a Section 106 report on the Identification of Historic Properties and Assessment of Adverse Effects for the K1, K4, K6, K7, and K8 Feeder Line Replacement Project at Vandenberg Air Force Base (VAFB), Santa Barbara County, California. The Area of Potential Effects (APE) was defined and delineated by VAFB archaeologists. An Area of Direct Impact (ADI) was developed to include those areas that would sustain ground disturbance during demolition and construction. The APE contained 17 previously recorded sites, and one site that recorded during the course of this project. The purpose of this project is to demolish several overhead electrical feeder lines. This report seeks State Historic Preservation Office concurrence that 1) VAFB delineated an adequate APE, 2) that 5 cultural resource sites do not meet the National Register of Historic Places criteria of significance, and 3) that the report concluded no adverse effect to historic properties.