Meridindia kaniza Ghauri 1982
Creators: name: Salini, S.
name: Gracy, R. G.
name: Sushil, S. N.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2024
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hemiptera
Pentatomidae
Meridindia
Meridindia kaniza

description: Meridindia kaniza Ghauri, 1982 (Figs. 4–29)
Meridindia kaniza Ghauri, 1982: 18–19, 23, figs. 60–77, 88.
Meridindia kaniza Ghauri: Salini & Viraktamath (2015): 22 (distribution).
Meridindia farhata Ghauri, 1982: 19–20, 23, figs. 78–87, 89–92, syn. nov.
Meridindia farhata Ghauri: Salini & Viraktamath (2015): 22 (distribution).
Type localities. Meridindia kaniza: India, South India, Kerala, Malabar, ‘Nedungayam 200’ (Fig. 6). Meridindia farhata: India, Kerala, Travancore, Thekkadi, Periyar Dam (Fig. 3).
Type material Meridindia kaniza (Figs. 4–5, 7–9): Holotype: INDIA: 1 ♂, S. India / Malabar / ‘Nedungayam 200' / 16–22-IX-38 [P] // Pres. by Comm. Inst. Ent. B. M. 1983-1 [P] // Meridindia kaniza gen et. sp. n. [hw] / det M.S.K. Ghauri, 1982 [P+hw] // Dalpada clavata or species close to [hw] // NHMUK 013589990 [P] (BMNH; Fig. 6). Holotype is pinned, the dissected male genitalia placed in a glass microvial with glycerol and stain attached in a different pin, lodged adjacent to holotype specimen (Figs. 4–5).
Paratype: 1 ♂ (head missing), same data as that of holotype, dissected male genitalia placed in a glass microvial with glycerol and attached to the same pin (BMNH; Fig. 9); 1 ♀, same data as that of holotype, dissected female genitalia placed in a glass microvial with glycerol and attached to the same pin (BMNH; Figs. 7–8).
Meridindia farhata (Figs. 1–2): Holotype: INDIA: 1 ♂, India, Kerala, Thekkadi / Periyar Dam / Travancore, 6–10-v-1937 [P+hw] // Pres. by Comm. Inst. Ent. B. M. 1983-1 [P] // Meridindia farhata gen et. sp. n. (hw) / det M.S.K. Ghauri, 1982 [P+hw] // NHMUK 013589989 [P] (BMNH; Figs. 1–2). Holotype is pinned, the dissected male genitalia placed in a glass microvial with glycerol and stain attached in a different pin, lodged adjacent to holotype specimen.
Additional material examined. The materials were identified by Salini. S and deposited in NIM (ICAR-NBAIR) unless mentioned otherwise. INDIA: KERALA: Thrissur, KAU, Vellanikara, no date, 2♀, Students coll.; KARNATAKA: Bangalore, Hebbal, N 13 o 02 E 77 o 35, 22.vi.2011, 1♀; Bannerghatta / 11.02.2009, 1♂, Yeshwanth, H. M. //coll. on Butea monosperma // NBAII; Kodagu, Fraserpet, 11.ii.1930, 1♂, Sandal Insect Survey, Dalpada deplanata Breddin, det B. Uvarov, 1931, on Quercus incana (FRI, Dehradun); No locality and date, 1♂, NBAIR.
Redescription. Colouration. Body above (Figs. 4, 10) ochraceous, occasionally with reddish brown shades except with the presence of more or less well-expressed markings as follows: 1+1 spots at basal angles of scutellum, sometimes apex of scutellum pale yellow; anterior and posterior one fourth of connexival segments, black.Antennae concolorous to dorsum. Scutellar pit, black. Hemelytra concolorous to dorsal body colour, membrane fuscous with veins reddish brown. (But see variability section below.)
Ventral side (Figs. 5, 11) bright yellow except the following: lateral sides of head, thorax and abdomen and 1+1 large spots on either side of mesosternal median carina, black. Labium ochraceous with apex, black. Legs concolorous to ventral side except posterior one third of femora, anterior and posterior one third of tibiae and apex of tarsomere III, black. Sometimes, legs with reddish streaks. Margins of abdominal spiracles, and anterior and posterolateral angles of ventrites III to VII, black.
Integument and vestiture. Body above densely covered with coarse, round, brown to black punctures, clusters of punctures forming irregular spots over dorsum of body. Connexivum with fine, dense and concolorous punctures. Legs, head (ventral), pleura and lateral margins of ventrites II–VII with dense, round, black punctures. Abdominal venter medially with punctures fine and concolorous. Male genitalia with posterior half of ventral side of genital capsule with sparse, light brown, round punctures; median process on ventral side of genital capsule with fine, light brown punctures. Coalescence of dark brown punctures forming brown patch on disc of valvifers VIII (restricted to inner diagonal half), valvifers IX (narrow caudal margin); laterotergite IX (at the middle of outer margin) and laterotergite VIII (anterior half of disc and circumference except caudal margin).
Body glabrous except the following: antennae and legs with sparse, golden setae. Male genitalia with posteroventral margin of genital capsule dorsally bordered with row of erect, elongate, golden yellow setae; posterior half of ventral side of genital capsule including posterolateral angles with short, fine, golden yellow setae; median process of dorsal rim of genital capsule with short, erect, setae, golden yellow. Disc of valvifers VIII including mesial and posterior margin with semierect, moderately elongate brown setae; disc of valvifers IX medially and disc of laterotergite IX with dense, elongate, yellowish brown setae; disc of laterotergite VIII with sparse, short, yellowish brown setae.
Structure. Head (Figs. 12–14) nearly as long as or slightly shorter than wide. Apex of mandibular plates, sinuate with anterior apex of inner lobe rounded or truncate; lateral margins of mandibular plates with nearly indistinct denticle in front of compound eyes, sometimes with minute protuberance. Compound eyes rounded and protruded.Antennomeres from shortest to longest: I<IIa<IIb<IV<III. Bucculae partly covering the labiomere I from beneath; anterior apex of bucculae with minute denticle. Labiomere I as long as bucculae; apex of labium reaching or passing posterior margin of ventrite III. Pronotum (Fig. 15) with humeri slightly variable, usually subrounded. Membrane of hemelytra with six simple veins. Other characters as in generic redescription.
Male genitalia (Figs. 17–25). Genital capsule (Figs. 17–19) roughly quadrangular with posterolateral lobes (= caudal lobes) broad and rounded. Ventral rim posteriorly divided into dorsal (Fig. 19: dm) and ventral margin (Fig. 19: vm); dorsal margin deeply and widely excavated medially, bordered with elongate, golden yellow setae and gradually becoming indistinct laterad, ventral margin with deep, median U-shaped emargination, laterally delimited by 1+1 internal vertical ridges (Fig. 17: ivr); infoldings of ventral rim strongly impressed, produced posteriad, fused with infoldings of dorsal rim and forming 1+1 moderately deep pouch-like concavity inner to caudal lobes, on either side of 1+1 internal vertical ridges on ventral wall of genital capsule. Dorsal rim broadly concave, deep towards laterad; moderately broad median process (Fig. 17: mp) at middle of dorsal rim; posterior margin of median process shallowly concave. Superior processes of dorsal rim absent. Paramere (Figs. 20–21): Crown roughly Lshaped, slightly narrowed towards apex, apical margin broadly rounded; black, sclerotized, narrow longitudinal ridge (Fig. 20: sr) inner to dorsal margin of crown; stem short with short apodeme. Articulatory apparatus (Fig. 22): Basal plate and support bridge complex fused to form cup-like structure with roughly triangular capitate processes (cp) attached through dorsal connectives (dc). Phallus (Figs. 23–25): Phallotheca, convex dorsally, sclerotized and constricted towards both ends; proximal end slightly twisted ventrad possessing short angular process (Fig. 25: vt) ventromedially (= ventral tubercles of theca by Gapon & Konstantinov 2006); four pairs of conjunctival processes (Figs. 23–25: cj), inner dorsal pair (Fig. 25: cj1) short, membranous and sessile; outer dorsal pair (Figs. 23–24: cj2) elongate, semisclerotized (distal apex membranous), pear-shaped; inner ventral pair (Fig. 25: cj3) finger-like, sclerotized apically and membranous and fused basally, curved ventro-posteriad; outer ventral pair (Fig. 25: cj4), membranous and sessile; a pair of processes of aedeagus (= penial lobes) (Fig. 23: pa) sclerotized, basally fused with U-shaped notch between arms, adpressed to base of aedeagus; aedeagus (Figs. 23, 25: ae) elongate, sickle-shaped, tubular longer than conjunctival processes and processes of aedeagus.
Female genitalia (Figs. 26–29). Terminalia (Figs. 26–28): Valvifers VIII (Figs. 26–27: vlf8) subtriangular with inner lateral margins (mesial margins) straight, inner posterior angles truncate. Valvifers IX (Figs. 26–27: vlf9) nearly trapezoidal. Laterotergite IX (Figs. 26–27: lt9) elongate, oblique, trapezoidal shape with posterior apex narrowly rounded. Laterotergite VIII (Figs. 26–27: lt8), triangular, caudal margin of laterotergite VIII with minute, black denticle at the middle. Gynatrium (Fig. 28) with an inverted V-shaped sclerite (Fig. 28: vs) surrounding spermathecal opening; ring sclerites (Fig. 28: rs) developed into elongate, oval-shaped sclerites (medially transparent). Spermatheca (Fig. 29): Spermathecal dilation regularly, obliquely fluted externally; intermediate part of spermtheca (= spermthecal pump) short with distal flange larger than proximal flange; apical receptacle (Fig. 29: ar) suborbicular with three finger-like ductules.
Measurements (mm). Males (n = 3; median (minimum–maximum)). Body length 13.14 (12.24–14.66); head: length 2.76 (2.59–3.08), width (including eyes) 2.94 (2.91–3.08), interocular width 1.69 (1.62–1.78); lengths of antennomeres: I—0.77 (0.68–0.81), II—1.65 (1.58–1.81), III—1.82 (1.79–1.83), IV—2.34 (2.29–2.39), V—2.07; lengths of labiomeres: I—1.21 (1.12–1.26), II—2.16 (2.15–2.36), III—1.91 (1.87–2.10), IV—1.28 (1.28–1.51); pronotum: length 2.47 (2.41–2.81), width (including humeri) 5.54 (5.46–6.06); scutellum: length 3.96 (3.73–4.43), width (at basal angles) 3.33 (3.33–3.82).
Females (n = 3; median (minimum–maximum)). Body length 15.18 (14.81–15.80); head: length 3.61 (3.48– 3.60), width (including eyes) 3.58 (3.33–3.74), interocular width 2.02 (1.90–2.09); lengths of antennomeres: I—0.86 (0.83–0.98), II—1.74 (1.61–1.81), III—1.96 (1.90–2.02), IV—2.67 (2.53–2.80), V—2.17; length of labiomeres: I—1.38 (1.38–1.42), II—2.48 (2.45–2.84), III—2.42 (2.18–2.58), IV—1.29 (1.13–1.38); pronotum: length 3.18 (3.14–3.51), width (including humeri) 6.77 (6.76–7.37); scutellum: length 5.19 (5.07–5.60), width (at basal angles) 4.30 (4.24–4.49).
Variation. Body colour usually ochraceous with black markings formed due to coalescence of coarse brown punctures. Corium sometimes more reddish than ochraceous. Size of the ochraceous spot at basal angles of scutellum variable, sometimes moderate sized or elongate and subtriangular.
Bionomics. Examined specimens were collected on bark of Butea monosperma (Lam.) Taub. (Fabales: Fabaceae), however, without finding of nymphs there is not enough evidence to consider it a true host plant (viz Burckhardt et al. 2014).
Distribution. India: Karnataka (Bangalore, Kodagu) (new record); Kerala (Idukki, Nadungayam, Thekkady, Thrissur) (Ghauri 1982, as M. kaniza and M. farhata; this paper).
Remarks. Ghauri (1982) differentiated M. kaniza and M. farhata mainly based on minor differences in male genital capsule (depth of median emargination in median septum and minor size difference in dorsomedian marginal appendages and ventral internal ridges), paramere head (breadth when viewed laterally), width of head, and size of basal scutellar spots. Based on examination of type material, the diagnostic characters used for distinguishing M. farhata from M. kaniza were found to be within the variability usually found among specimens of various species of Meridindia. The characters such as width of head and size of scutellar spots were found to be same in the male holotype of M. farhata (Fig. 4) and female paratype of M. kaniza (Fig. 7) and therefore, cannot be considered as a diagnostic character for M. farhata. Moreover, the paramere and phallus of M. farhata and M. kaniza were found to be the same, which justifies the need of synoymization of the former with M. kaniza. Unfortunately, the genital capsule of the sole available specimen of M. farhata, the holotype, could not be re-examined as it was in completely destroyed condition. However, based on the above mentioned evidence the following subjective synonymy is proposed: M. kaniza Ghauri, 1982 = M. farhata Ghauri, 1982, syn. nov.
description: Published as part of Salini, S., Gracy, R. G. & Sushil, S. N., 2024, Revision of Meridindia (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), an endemic genus, with description of a new species from India, pp. 207-234 in Zootaxa 5428 (2) on pages 213-219, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.3, http://zenodo.org/record/10847508