<b>The Effects of Creep Feed and Feed Additives on Lactation and Nursery Performance of Pigs</b>
Creators: name: Pounds, Kara Justine
Publisher: name: Purdue University Graduate School
Year: 2024
Subjects: classificationCode: 300303
subject: Animal nutrition
classificationCode: 300302
subject: Animal management

description: Maximizing growth performance in swine production, in the face of larger litter sizes and potential milk limitations, is crucial. This thesis explores the impact of various nutritional strategies, including creep feeding, dietary sweeteners, glutamine supplementation, sensory additives, and low crude protein diets on piglet lactation and nursery growth performance. Data in this thesis were analyzed using the GLM procedure in SAS 9.4. In the first study (Chapter 2), fifty-one sows and their litters (17/creep treatment) were used to evaluate the effects of creep feeding and nursery diets on piglet growth. Ten days prior to weaning, litters were assigned to three treatments: control creep feed (CF-CON), CON + garlic-based flavoring (50 ppm Allium XL; CF-ALL-XL), and no creep feed (NO-CF). Post-weaning, 506 pigs were allotted to either control (CON) or flavored (ALL-XL) nursery diets in a 3x2 factorial design with 10 pens/treatment, each containing 7 or 8 pigs. Nursery dietary treatments were fed in phases 1 and 2, followed by common phase 3 and 4 diets. Weekly body weights (BW) and feed intake were recorded to calculate average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and feed efficiency (G:F). Creep feeding treatment during lactation did not affect litter or piglet BW gain pre-weaning. ALL-XL did not affect total creep feed intake (CON=114 g/pig vs. ALL-XL=110 g/pig). Providing CF-CON or CF-ALL-XL during lactation increased ADFI on d 2, 3, and 4 post-weaning (P&lt;0.013). Pigs fed either CF-CON or CF-ALL-XL increased week 1 nursery ADFI (8.8%; P&lt;0.02), numerically increased ADG (5.2%), and greater d7 BW (P=0.055). Overall (d0-35), pigs fed CF-CON had greater ADG (P&lt;0.05) and ADFI (P&lt;0.05) than CF-ALL-XL with No-CF pigs being intermediate in ADG and greater ADFI (P&lt;0.05) than CF-ALL-XL fed pigs. Final BW (P&lt;0.05) was greater for CF-CON fed pigs than CF-ALL-XL fed pigs with No-CF pigs being intermediate (23.5 kg, 23.0 kg, 23.3 kg, respectively). Nursery dietary flavoring treatment (CON vs ALL-XL) did not affect post-weaning ADG, ADFI, or G:F at any point during the study (P&gt;0.12). In the second study (Chapter 3), fifty-seven sows and their litters were used to test the effects of creep feed and a dietary sweetener (Taktik) on piglet lactation and nursery performance in low lactose diets. Six days prior to weaning, litters were assigned to either control creep feed (CF-CON), control + sweetener (50 ppm Taktik; CF-TAK), or no creep (No-CF). Post-weaning, 550 pigs were assigned to control (CON) or sweetened (Taktik, 50 ppm; TAK) nursery diets in a 3x2 factorial design with 10 nursery pens per treatment, each containing 9 or 10 pigs. There were no significant differences in litter weight, weight gain, or piglet weight during lactation due to CF treatment. However, CF-CON pigs tended to have higher litter feed intake (P=0.060) and ADFI per pig (P=0.059) during lactation. During the first week post-weaning, CF-CON pigs had higher ADFI (P&lt;0.05), ADG (P&lt;0.05), and d7 BW compared to CF-Tak pigs and No-CF pigs. During d 6-14 CF-CON pigs had greater ADG (P&lt;0.05) and ADFI (P&lt;0.05) than CF-Tak pigs and the No-CF pigs tended (P&lt;0.10) to also have greater ADFI than CF-Tak pigs. Overall (d0-34), CF-CON pigs had higher ADG and ADFI compared to CF-Tak pigs (P&lt;0.05) and No-CF pigs tended (P&lt;0.10) to have greater ADG than CF-Tak pigs. There were no significant differences (P&gt;0.15) in ADG, ADFI, or G:F between CON and TAK nursery diet treatments. In the third study (chapter 4), thirty-one sows and their litters were utilized to test the effects creep feed and nursery diets supplemented with or without glutamine on lactation and nursery performance as well as creep feeder type impacts. During lactation there were three dietary treatments: control creep feed (CF-CON), control creep feed + glutamine (0.40%; CF-GLUT), or no creep feed (No-CF). There were two creep feeder types: plastic (PLAST) or stainless steel (SS), that were evenly distributed between the creep feed treatments. Post-weaning 270 pigs were allotted to either control (CON) or control + glutamine (0.40%; GLUT) nursery diets with pigs previously given or not glutamine creep feed continuing to receive similar glutamine treatment in the nursery period and the No-CF pigs being evenly split to CON and GLUT nursery diets. Litter weights and creep feed intake were recorded on d -7 and 0 (weaning). During nursery there were 7 pens/treatment with 6 or 7 pigs/pen, blocked by initial BW within creep treatment. Neither glutamine creep feeding treatments affected litter or piglet weaning weights (P&gt;0.24). Pigs given creep feed during lactation had increased ADFI during the first week post-weaning (P&lt;0.03) but did not result in greater overall nursery growth performance. The inclusion of glutamine in creep feed or nursery diets did not improve growth performance at any point during the study. In the fourth study (chapter 5), 416 weanling pigs were used to test the effects of a sensory feed additive (SA; Luctamax) on control (CON) and low crude protein (LCP) nursery diets in a 2x2 factorial design (CON, CON+SA, LCP, LCP+SA) with 15 replicate pens of 6 or 7 pigs/pen. Decreased dietary CP (4%) was achieved by removing or decreasing fish meal and soy concentrate in phases 1 and 2 and reducing soybean meal in phase 3 and adding synthetic amino acids to maintain amino acid ratios (NRC 2012). The SA was included at 0.1% in Phase 1 and 2 diets and 0.05% in Phase 3 diets. During PH1 (d 0-7) pigs receiving the CON diets tended (P=0.065) to have a higher G:F compared to pigs receiving LCP diets. For the remainder of this study there were consistent interactions between dietary CP and SA. When SA was added to the LCP diet ADFI slightly increased but when SA was added to CON diet ADFI decreased and these changes in feed intake often led to similar dietary interactions in ADG. During PH2 (d 7-21), pigs fed CON or LCP+SA diets had higher ADFI (P=0.032) and tended to have a higher ADG (P=0.094) but reduced G:F (P=0.100) compared to pigs fed CON+SA or LCP diets. In PH3 (d 21-36), pigs fed CON or LCP+SA diets had a higher ADG (P=0.027) and ADFI (P=0.011) compared to CON+SA or LCP diets. During PH3 pigs fed LCP diets had higher ADFI (P&lt;0.001) but reduced G:F (P&lt;0.0001) than pigs fed CON diets. Overall (d0-36), pigs fed CON or LCP+SA diets had higher ADFI (P=0.016) and tended to have a higher ADG (P=0.059) but reduced G:F (P=0.067) compared to pigs fed CON+SA or LCP diets. For the entire nursery period, pigs fed CON diets had a higher G:F (P&lt;0.001) compared to pigs fed LCP diets, while LCP pigs tended to have a higher ADFI (P=0.054) compared to CON pigs. Feeding LCP diets during PH2 decreased feed costs/kg of gain but feed cost were increased (P&lt;0.0001) during PH3 when LCP diets were fed compared to CON diets. These studies highlight the potential benefits and limitations of various nutritional strategies in enhancing piglet growth performance. Creep feeding, dietary sweeteners, glutamine supplementation, sensory additives, and low crude protein diets can potentially influence post-weaning performance, but their effectiveness depends on specific conditions and formulations. Further research is needed to optimize these strategies for improved swine production efficiency.