Ochotona hyperborea subsp. hyperborea
Creators: name: Lissovsky, Andrey A.
name: Obolenskaya, Ekaterina V.
name: Dokuchaev, Nikolai E.
name: Okhlopkov, Innokentiy M.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Mammalia
Lagomorpha
Ochotonidae
Ochotona
Ochotona hyperborea
Ochotona hyperborea hyperborea (pallas, 1811)

description: Ochotona hyperborea hyperborea (Pallas, 1811)
Lagomys hyperboreus var. ferruginea Schrenk, 1858 Lagomys hyperboreus var. normalis Schrenk, 1858 Lagomys litoralis Peters, 1882
Ochotona kolymensis Allen, 1903
Ochotona hyperborea minima Sokolov et al., 1994 Ochotona hyperborea shamani Sokolov et al., 1994
Type.— Specimen unknown; the nominal taxon Lepus hyperboreus was described by P. S. Pallas on the basis of specimens collected by Carl Heinrich Merck (Pallas 1811:152).
Type locality.— Chukchi Peninsula “terris Tschuktschicis” (Pallas 1811:152). This toponym can describe large territory; however, C. Merck only visited the northern part of Chukchi Peninsula along the trek from St. Laurent Bay–Mechigmen Bay (13–26 of September 1791)–Kolyutchin Bay (14 October)– Amguema River (18 November)–Chaun River (19 January 1792)–Anyuyskiy Ostrog at the estuary of Angarka River (14 February; 66.85°N, 164.25°E; Merck 1782–1792 [1980]). The detailed map of the route was published by Sarychev (1811). Merck mentioned Anyuyskiy Ostrog as the final point of expedition, hence probably did not collect during the journey to Yakutsk through Nizhnekolymskiy Ostrog. Thus, the route from St. Laurent Bay to Anyuyskiy Ostrog should be considered as the type locality of O. h. hyperborea.
Description.— Pikas of the A genetic lineage; northern acoustic race. Besides genetics, this subspecies can be distinguished from neighboring O. h. uralensis by the shape of parietal suture of the skull (Fig. 5). There are differences in the shape of the frequency modulation curve of alarm call with another spatial neighbor— O. h. cinereoflava (Fig. 6).
Distribution.— The most northeastern part of the distribution range of the species: Chukchi and Kamchatka Peninsulas, Kolyma and Koryak Uplands, and Indigirka River basin. Provisionally, the distributional border with O. h. uralensis corresponds roughly to the watershed between the Yana and Indigirka River basins (at least its eastern part). Junction with distribution of O. h. cinereoflava is possible to the north of the Dzhugdzhur Range.
Nomenclatural notes.— The nominal taxon Ochotona hyperborea shamani provisionally is considered herein a junior synonym of O. h. hyperborea. Ochotona h. shamani was described on the basis of a sample of pikas from the Indigirka River basin (near Shamanovo: 69.95°N, 147.57°E); we had no genetic data from this location. Our distributional analysis confirmed the proximity of the Indigirka River basin to the distribution O. h. hyperborea, although this factor alone cannot be used as a strong argument to select between O. h. hyperborea and O. h. uralensis. The prevailing shape of the parietal suture in the studied sample also suggests this population belongs to O. h. hyperborea.
description: Published as part of Lissovsky, Andrey A., Obolenskaya, Ekaterina V., Dokuchaev, Nikolai E. & Okhlopkov, Innokentiy M., 2021, Intraspecific variation and taxonomy of northern pika Ochotona hyperborea (Mammalia, Lagomorpha), pp. 28-53 in Journal of Mammalogy 102 (1) on pages 36-37, DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyaa150, http://zenodo.org/record/7850862