cometadata/datacite-rtg-text-other-reclassification-records huggingface dataset:
Pseudoniphargidae G. Karaman 1993
Creators: name: Myers, A
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2013
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Pseudoniphargidae

description: Pseudoniphargidae G. Karaman, 1993
Type genus. Pseudoniphargus Chevreux, 1901.
Diagnostic description. Body laterally compressed or subcylindrical. Eyes absent. Antennae 1–2 calceoli absent. Antenna 1 longer than antenna 2; peduncular article 1 longer than article 2; article 2 longer than article 3; article 3 shorter than article 1; peduncular articles 1–2 not geniculate; accessory flagellum short or minute. Antenna 2 peduncular article 1 enlarged, bulbous. Mandible molar triturative; palp symmetrical. Maxilla 1 basal endite apically setose; palps symmetrical. Maxilla 2 basal endite without oblique setal row. Labium inner lobes present.
Coxal gills number and sequence [not known], stalked (without proximal restriction); sternal gills absent; sternal blisters absent; oostegites fringing setae simple. Gnathopod 1 subchelate; dissimilar in males and females (sexually dimorphic); smaller (or weaker) than gnathopod 2; propodus palm with row or rows of simple or bifid robust setae along palmar margin (reduced in size). Gnathopod 2 subchelate; dissimilar in males and females (sexually dimorphic); carpus not produced along posterior margin of propodus, projecting between merus and propodus. Pereopods 3–4 not sexually dimorphic. Pereopod 4 with well developed posteroventral lobe or without posteroventral lobe. Pereopod 5 shorter than pereopod 6; coxa with small anteroventral lobe. Pereopod 7 longer than pereopod 5. Pleonites 1–3 without dorsal carinae. Urosomites 1–3 free; with or without slender or robust dorsal setae. Urosomite 1 without large distoventral robust seta. Urosomite 2 without dorsal setae. Uropod 1 with or without basofacial robust setae. Uropod 3 sexually dimorphic (adriaticus group) or not; biramous, without plumose setae; endopod minute. Telson notched, emarginate or entire; dorsal or lateral robust setae absent; apical robust setae present.
Habitat. Freshwater, hypogean.
Included genera. Parapseudoniphargus Notenboom 1988; Pseudoniphargus Chevreux, 1901.
Remarks. G. Karaman (1993) does not strictly follow the ICZN rules for establishing this family, in that he does not specifically state that it is a new family, but he does give a type genus and indicates that it is monotypic. We therefore attribute authorship of the family to G. Karaman (1993).
Distribution. Mediterranean region and Canary Islands.
description: Published as part of Myers, A, 2013, A Phylogeny and Classification of the Senticaudata subord. nov. (Crustacea: Amphipoda), pp. 1-80 in Zootaxa 3610 (1) on pages 45-46, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3610.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/283309
Chlamisus rufescens Gressitt 1946
Creators: name: Su, Liang
name: Zhou, Hong-Zhang
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2017
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Chrysomelidae
Chlamisus
Chlamisus rufescens

description: Chlamisus rufescens Gressitt, 1946
Gressitt, 1946: 94 (type locality: Yim-na San (Yam-na Shan), alt. 800 meters, N. E. Kwangtung Prov., S. E. China; type deposited: CAS); Gressitt & Kimoto, 1961: 185.
Distribution. China (Guangdong).
description: Published as part of Su, Liang & Zhou, Hong-Zhang, 2017, Taxonomy of the genus Chlamisus Rafinesque (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) from China with description of three new species, pp. 1-138 in Zootaxa 4233 (1) on page 76, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.322116
Austroniphargidae Iannilli, Krapp & Ruffo 2011
Creators: name: Myers, A
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2013
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Austroniphargidae

description: Austroniphargidae Iannilli, Krapp & Ruffo, 2011
Type genus. Austroniphargus Monod, 1925.
Diagnostic description. Body laterally compressed. Eyes absent. Antennae 1–2 calceoli absent. Antenna 1 longer than antenna 2; peduncular article 1 longer than article 2; article 2 subequal to or longer than article 3; article 3 shorter than article 1; peduncular articles 1–2 not geniculate; accessory flagellum short or minute. Antenna 2 peduncular article 1 enlarged, bulbous. Mandible molar triturative; palp symmetrical. Maxilla 1 basal endite apically setose; palps symmetrical or asymmetrical. Maxilla 2 basal endite without oblique setal row. Labium inner lobes vestigial or absent. Coxal gills on pereopods 2–7 or on pereopods 2–6, not stalked; sternal gills absent; sternal blisters absent; oostegites fringing setae simple. Gnathopod 1 subchelate; similar in size to gnathopod 2; propodus palm without robust setae along palmar margin. Gnathopod 2 subchelate; dissimilar in males and females (sexually dimorphic); carpus slightly produced along posterior margin of propodus. Pereopods 3–4 not sexually dimorphic. Pereopod 4 with well developed posteroventral lobe or without posteroventral lobe. Pereopod 5 subequal in length to pereopod 6; coxa with posterodorsal lobe. Pereopod 7 subequal in length to pereopod 5. Pleonites 1–3 without dorsal carinae. Urosomites 1–3 coalesced; without slender or robust dorsal setae. Urosomite 1 with large distoventral robust seta. Urosomite 2 without dorsal setae. Uropod 1 without basofacial robust setae. Uropod 3 not sexually dimorphic; biramous or uniramous, without plumose setae; endopod minute. Telson weakly cleft, notched, emarginate or entire; dorsal or lateral robust setae present or absent; apical robust setae present.
Habitat. Freshwater, hypogean.
Included genera. Austroniphargus Monod, 1925; Libertinia Iannilli, Krapp & Ruffo, 2011; Davidia Iannilli, Krapp & Ruffo, 2011.
Distribution. Madagascar.
description: Published as part of Myers, A, 2013, A Phylogeny and Classification of the Senticaudata subord. nov. (Crustacea: Amphipoda), pp. 1-80 in Zootaxa 3610 (1) on page 46, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3610.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/283309
Pseudoamblyteles Heinrich 1926
Creators: name: Riedel, Matthias
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2019
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hymenoptera
Ichneumonidae
Pseudoamblyteles

description: Key to the ♀♀ of known Pseudoamblyteles species:
1 Body completely black, without blue-metallic shine. Palaearctic region .............................. .................................................................................................... P. homocerus (WESMAEL)
- 2 nd and 3 rd tergites red. Himalaya ........................................................................................2
2 Mesosoma and metasoma with slight blue-metallic shine. Mesoscutum, mesopleuron and metapleuron coarsely rugose-punctate. Genal carina complete, hypostomal carina low. Nepal ........................................................................................... P. nepalensis nov.sp.
- Body black, without blue-metallic shine. Mesoscutum, mesopleuron and metapleuron densely punctate, not or only slightly rugose. Genal carina obsolete ventrally, not reaching hypostomal carina; hypostomal carina lamelliform. Nepal ........ P. genator nov.sp.
description: Published as part of Riedel, Matthias, 2019, Contribution to the Ichneumoninae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) of Nepal, pp. 1119-1162 in Linzer biologische Beiträge 51 (2) on page 1149, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3742020
Chillagoeidae Lowry & Myers 2012
Creators: name: Myers, A
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2013
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Chillagoeidae

description: Chillagoeidae Lowry & Myers, 2012
Type genus. Chillagoe Barnard & Williams, 1995.
Diagnostic description. Body laterally compressed. Eyes absent. Antennae 1–2 calceoli crangonyctoid (type 9). Antenna 1 subequal in length or longer than antenna 2; peduncular article 1 subequal to, or longer than article 2; article 2 longer than article 3; article 3 shorter than article 1; peduncular articles 1–2 not geniculate; accessory flagellum short. Antenna 2 peduncular article 1 enlarged, bulbous. Mandible molar triturative; palp symmetrical. Maxilla 1 basal endite setose along medial margin or apically setose; palps symmetrical. Maxilla 2 basal endite without oblique setal row. Labium inner lobes vestigial or absent. Coxal gills on pereopods 2–6, stalked (without proximal restriction) or not stalked; sternal gills present, simple; sternal blisters absent; oostegites fringing setae simple. Gnathopod subchelate; 1 similar in males and females (not sexually dimorphic); smaller (or weaker) than or similar in size to gnathopod 2; propodus palm without robust setae along palmar margin. Gnathopod 2 subchelate; 1 similar in males and females (not sexually dimorphic); carpus slightly produced along posterior margin of propodus or not produced along posterior margin of propodus, projecting between merus and propodus. Pereopods 3–4 not sexually dimorphic. Pereopod 4 with well developed posteroventral lobe or with small posteroventral lobe or without posteroventral lobe. Pereopod 5 shorter than pereopod 6; coxa with small anteroventral lobe. Pereopod 7 subequal in length to, or longer than pereopod 5. Pleonites 1–3 without dorsal carinae. Urosomites 1–3 free; with slender or robust dorsal setae. Urosomite 1 with large distoventral robust seta. Urosomite 2 with pair of dorsal concavities each with 1–3 small setae. Uropod 1 with 1 or 2 basofacial robust setae. Uropod 3 not sexually dimorphic; uniramous, without plumose setae. Telson deeply cleft; dorsal or lateral robust setae present or absent; apical robust setae present.
Habitat. Freshwater, hypogean.
Included genera. Chillagoe Barnard & Williams, 1995.
Distribution. Tropical Australia.
description: Published as part of Myers, A, 2013, A Phylogeny and Classification of the Senticaudata subord. nov. (Crustacea: Amphipoda), pp. 1-80 in Zootaxa 3610 (1) on page 47, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3610.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/283309
Ophion ventricosus Gravenhorst 1829
Creators: name: Johansson, Niklas
name: Cederberg, Björn
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2019
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hymenoptera
Ichneumonidae
Ophion
Ophion ventricosus

description: Ophion ventricosus Gravenhorst, 1829
Fig. 11 C–D
Ichneumon impressus Thunberg, 1822: 262 (not Gmelin, 1790) (preoccupied).
Ophion ventricosus Gravenhorst, 1829: 702.
Material examined
Lectotype, ♀, of Ophion impressus (EMU); 77 ♀♀, 69 ♂♂ (Sweden); 14 ♀♀, 9 ♂♂ (France); 2 ♀♀ (Norway).
Diagnosis
Fore wing length 14–16 mm. Antenna in both sexes with 44–56 flagellomeres. First flagellomere 2.5–3.5 times longer than wide. Head strongly buccate behind eyes. Malar space about 0.2 times as long as mandibular base in female and about 0.3 times in males. Mandibular gape right angeles with internal angles. Mesopleuron weakly shagreened or polished, distinctly punctate. Spaces between punctures about equal to their diameter. Pleurosternal angles strongly obtuse, weakly defined and obviously anterior to the almost absent sternal angles. Sternal part of epicnemial carina very broad an evenly curved. Scutellum with distinct lateral carinae at least in the basal half. Radius of forewing distinctly thickened and bent near junction with pterostigma. Ramellus short. Wing membrane strongly yellowish. Propodeum strongly coriaceous with distinct carination.
Colour
Body testaceous with conspicuous black markings on mesosoma and head (Fig. 11 C–D). Metasoma in both sexes with posterior segments at least partly black. Mandibular teeth black.
DNA barcode
The DNA barcode sequences of four Swedish specimens of Ophion ventricosus are available at the BOLD systems database (www.boldsystems.org, BIN. BOLD: ABV5256. Specimen codes: STI-NJBC: 94, 96–98).
Ecology
This species occurs during early summer, May–June, in oak-dominated deciduous landscapes. It has been reared from Phigalia pilosaria (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775) (Brock 1982).
Distribution in Sweden
Primarily a southern species occurring in areas with oak forests.
Remarks
The most distinctive of the Swedish Ophion species, with its yellowish wing membrane and black body markings.
description: Published as part of Johansson, Niklas & Cederberg, Björn, 2019, Review of the Swedish species of Ophion (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Ophioninae), with the description of 18 new species and an illustrated key to Swedish species, pp. 1-136 in European Journal of Taxonomy 550 on pages 110-111, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2019.550, http://zenodo.org/record/3476402
Crangonyctidae Bousfield 1973
Creators: name: Myers, A
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2013
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Crangonyctidae

description: Crangonyctidae Bousfield, 1973
Type genus. Crangonyx Bate, 1859.
Diagnostic description. Body laterally compressed or subcylindrical. Eyes well developed or absent, if present then round, ovoid or subrectangular. Antennae 1–2 calceoli crangonyctoid (type 9). Antenna 1 longer than antenna 2; peduncular article 1 subequal to, or longer than article 2; article 2 longer than article 3; article 3 shorter than article 1; peduncular articles 1–2 not geniculate; accessory flagellum minute. Antenna 2 peduncular article 1 enlarged, bulbous. Mandible molar triturative; palp symmetrical. Maxilla 1 basal endite setose along medial margin or apically setose; palps symmetrical. Maxilla 2 basal endite with oblique setal row. Labium inner lobes present. Coxal gills number and sequence [not known], stalked (with proximal restriction or complete suture); sternal gills present, simple; sternal blisters absent; oostegites fringing setae simple. Gnathopod 1 subchelate; similar in males and females (not sexually dimorphic); smaller (or weaker) than or similar in size to gnathopod 2; propodus palm with row or rows of simple or bifid robust setae along palmar margin. Gnathopod 2 subchelate; similar in males and females (not sexually dimorphic); carpus not produced along posterior margin of propodus, projecting between merus and propodus. Pereopods 3–4 not sexually dimorphic. Pereopod 4 with well developed posteroventral lobe or without posteroventral lobe. Pereopod 5 shorter than, subequal in length to, or longer than pereopod 6; coxa with large anteroventral lobe or with small anteroventral lobe. Pereopod 7 shorter than, subequal in length to, or longer than pereopod 5. Pleonites 1–3 without dorsal carinae. Urosomites 1–3 free; without slender or robust dorsal setae. Urosomite 1 with or without large distoventral robust seta. Urosomite 2 without dorsal setae. Uropod 1 with 1 or 2 basofacial robust setae or without basofacial robust setae. Uropod 3 not sexually dimorphic; biramous, uniramous or rami absent, without plumose setae; endopod minute or shorter than exopod. Telson moderately cleft, notched, emarginate or entire; dorsal or lateral robust setae absent; apical robust setae present.
Habitat. Freshwater, hypogean and epigean.
Included genera. Bactrurus Hay, 1902; Crangonyx Bate, 1859; Lyurella Derzhavin, 1939; Pachypodacrangonyx Boutin & Coineau, 1987; Stygobromus Cope, 1872; Stygonyx Bousfield & Holsinger, 1989; Synurella Wrzesniowski, 1877.
Distribution. Holarctic.
description: Published as part of Myers, A, 2013, A Phylogeny and Classification of the Senticaudata subord. nov. (Crustacea: Amphipoda), pp. 1-80 in Zootaxa 3610 (1) on page 47, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3610.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/283309
Giniphargidae Lowry & Myers 2012
Creators: name: Myers, A
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2013
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Giniphargidae

description: Giniphargidae Lowry & Myers 2012
Type genus. Giniphargus Williams & Barnard, 1988.
Diagnostic description. Body subcylindrical or vermiform. Eyes absent. Antennae 1–2 calceoli absent. Antenna 1 longer than antenna 2; peduncular article 1 shorter than article 2; article 2 longer than article 3; article 3 shorter than article 1; peduncular articles 1–2 not geniculate; accessory flagellum short. Antenna 2 peduncular article 1 enlarged, bulbous. Mandible molar absent; palp symmetrical. Maxilla 1 basal endite setose along medial margin; palps symmetrical. Maxilla 2 basal endite with oblique setal row. Labium inner lobes present. Coxal gills on pereopods 2–6; sternal gills present, simple; sternal blisters absent; oostegites fringing setae simple. Gnathopod 1 subchelate; similar in males and females (not sexually dimorphic); similar in size to gnathopod 2; propodus palm without robust setae along palmar margin. Gnathopod 2 subchelate; similar in males and females (not sexually dimorphic); carpus not produced along posterior margin of propodus, projecting between merus and propodus. Pereopods 3–4 not sexually dimorphic. Pereopod 4 without posteroventral lobe. Pereopod 5 shorter than pereopod 6; coxa with posterodorsal lobe. Pereopod 7 longer than pereopod 5. Pleonites 1–3 without dorsal carinae. Urosomites 1–3 free; without slender or robust dorsal setae. Urosomite 1 with large distoventral robust seta. Urosomite 2 without dorsal setae. Uropod 1 without basofacial robust setae. Uropod 3 not sexually dimorphic; uniramous, without plumose setae. Telson moderately cleft; dorsal or lateral robust setae absent; apical robust setae present.
Habitat. Freshwater,? hypogean.
Included genera. Giniphargus Williams & Barnard, 1988.
Distribution. Temperate Australia.
description: Published as part of Myers, A, 2013, A Phylogeny and Classification of the Senticaudata subord. nov. (Crustacea: Amphipoda), pp. 1-80 in Zootaxa 3610 (1) on page 48, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3610.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/283309
Kotumsaridae Messouli, Holsinger & Reddy 2007
Creators: name: Myers, A
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2013
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Kotumsaridae

description: Kotumsaridae Messouli, Holsinger & Reddy, 2007
Type genus. Kotumsaria Messouli, Holsinger & Reddy, 2007.
Diagnostic description. Body subcylindrical. Eyes absent. Antennae 1–2 calceoli absent. Antenna 1 slightly longer than antenna 2; peduncular article 1 longer than article 2; article 2 longer than article 3; article 3 shorter than article 1; peduncular articles 1–2 not geniculate; accessory flagellum absent. Antenna 2 peduncular article 1 enlarged, bulbous. Mandible molar triturative; palp symmetrical. Maxilla 1 basal endite apically setose; palps symmetrical. Maxilla 2 basal endite without oblique setal row. Labium inner lobes vestigial or absent. Coxal gills on pereopods 2–6, stalked (with proximal restriction or complete suture); sternal gills present, simple; sternal blisters absent. Gnathopod 1 subchelate; similar in males and females (not sexually dimorphic); larger (or stouter) than gnathopod 2; propodus palm with single row of simple robust setae along palmar margin. Gnathopod 2 subchelate; similar in males and females (not sexually dimorphic); carpus not produced along posterior margin of propodus, projecting between merus and propodus. Pereopods 3–4 not sexually dimorphic. Pereopod 4 without posteroventral lobe. Pereopod 5 shorter than pereopod 6; coxa without lobes. Pereopod 7 longer than pereopod 5. Pleonites 1–3 without dorsal carinae. Urosomites 1–3 free; with slender or robust dorsal setae. Urosomite 1 with large distoventral robust seta. Urosomite 2 with pair of dorsal concavities each with 1–3 small setae. Uropod 1 without basofacial robust setae. Uropod 3 not sexually dimorphic; biramous, without plumose setae; endopod minute. Telson entire; dorsal or lateral robust setae absent; apical robust setae present.
Habitat. Freshwater, hypogean.
Included genera. Kotumsaria Messouli, Holsinger & Reddy, 2007.
Remarks. Messouli et al. (2007) alluded to the possibility that kotumsarids might be crangonyctidirans and our phylogenetic results indicate they are.
Distribution. India.
description: Published as part of Myers, A, 2013, A Phylogeny and Classification of the Senticaudata subord. nov. (Crustacea: Amphipoda), pp. 1-80 in Zootaxa 3610 (1) on page 48, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3610.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/283309
Niphargidae Bousfield 1977
Creators: name: Myers, A
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2013
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Niphargidae

description: Niphargidae Bousfield, 1977
Type genus. Niphargus Schiödte, 1849
Diagnostic description. Body laterally compressed, subcylindrical or vermiform. Eyes absent. Antennae 1–2 calceoli absent. Antenna 1 longer than antenna 2; peduncular article 1 longer than article 2; article 2 shorter than, subequal to, or longer than article 3; article 3 shorter than article 1; peduncular articles 1–2 not geniculate; accessory flagellum short or minute. Antenna 2 peduncular article 1 enlarged, bulbous. Mandible molar triturative; palp symmetrical. Maxilla 1 basal endite setose along medial margin or apically setose; palps symmetrical. Maxilla 2 basal endite without oblique setal row. Labium inner lobes present. Coxal gills number and sequence [not known], stalked (with proximal restriction or complete suture); sternal gills absent; sternal blisters absent; oostegites fringing setae simple. Gnathopod 1 subchelate; similar or dissimilar in males and females (sexually dimorphic); smaller (or weaker) than or similar in size to gnathopod 2; propodus palm without robust setae along palmar margin. Gnathopod 2 subchelate; similar or dissimilar in males and females (sexually dimorphic); carpus not produced along posterior margin of propodus, projecting between merus and propodus. Pereopods 3–4 not sexually dimorphic. Pereopod 4 with small posteroventral lobe or without posteroventral lobe. Pereopod 5 shorter than pereopod 6; coxa with posterodorsal lobe or with large anteroventral lobe or with small anteroventral lobe or without lobes. Pereopod 7 longer than pereopod 5. Pleonites 1–3 without dorsal carinae. Urosomites 1–3 free; with or without slender or robust dorsal setae. Urosomite 1 with large distoventral robust seta. Urosomite 2 with pair of dorsal concavities each with 1–3 small setae or without dorsal setae. Uropod 1 without basofacial robust setae. Uropod 3 biramous or uniramous, with plumose setae or without plumose setae; endopod minute or shorter than exopod. Telson deeply cleft or moderately cleft; dorsal or lateral robust setae present or absent; apical robust setae present or absent.
Habitat. Freshwater, hypogean.
Included genera. Carinurella Sket, 1971; Foroniphargus G. Karaman, 1985b; Haploginglymus Mateus & Mateus, 1958; Microniphargus Schellenberg, 1934; Niphargellus Schellenberg, 1938; Niphargobates Sket, 1981; Niphargopsis Chevreux, 1922; Niphargus Schiödte, 1849; Pontoniphargus Dancau, 1970. Distribution. Palaearctic.
description: Published as part of Myers, A, 2013, A Phylogeny and Classification of the Senticaudata subord. nov. (Crustacea: Amphipoda), pp. 1-80 in Zootaxa 3610 (1) on pages 49-50, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3610.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/283309
Paracrangonyctidae Bousfield 1983
Creators: name: Myers, A
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2013
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Paracrangonyctidae

description: Paracrangonyctidae Bousfield, 1983
Type genus. Paracrangonyx Stebbing, 1899 b.
Diagnostic description. Body subcylindrical or vermiform. Eyes absent. Antenna 1 subequal in length to, or longer than antenna 2; peduncular article 1 longer than article 2; article 2 longer than article 3; article 3 shorter than article 1; peduncular articles 1–2 not geniculate; accessory flagellum short or minute. Antennae 1–2 calceoli absent. Antenna 2 peduncular article 1 enlarged, bulbous. Mandible molar triturative; palp symmetrical. Maxilla 1 basal endite apically setose or without setae; palps symmetrical. Maxilla 2 basal endite without oblique setal row. Coxal gills on pereopods 2–6, stalked (without proximal restriction) or not stalked; sternal gills present, simple; sternal blisters absent; oostegites fringing setae simple. Gnathopod 1 subchelate; similar in males and females (not sexually dimorphic); similar in size to gnathopod 2; propodus palm without robust setae along palmar margin. Gnathopod 2 subchelate; similar in males and females (not sexually dimorphic); carpus not produced along posterior margin of propodus, projecting between merus and propodus. Pereopods 3–4 not sexually dimorphic. Pereopod 4 without posteroventral lobe. Pereopod 5 shorter than pereopod 6; coxa with small anteroventral lobe or without lobes. Pereopod 7 longer than pereopod 5. Pleonites 1–3 without dorsal carinae. Urosomites 1–3 free; without slender or robust dorsal setae. Urosomite 1 with large distoventral robust seta. Urosomite 2 without dorsal setae. Uropod 1 without basofacial robust setae. Uropod 3 not sexually dimorphic; biramous or uniramous, without plumose setae; endopod minute. Telson notched or entire; dorsal or lateral robust setae absent; apical robust setae present.
Habitat. Freshwater, hypogean.
Included genera. Paracrangonyx Stebbing, 1899 b.
Distribution. New Zealand.
description: Published as part of Myers, A, 2013, A Phylogeny and Classification of the Senticaudata subord. nov. (Crustacea: Amphipoda), pp. 1-80 in Zootaxa 3610 (1) on page 50, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3610.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/283309
Perthiidae Williams & Barnard 1988
Creators: name: Myers, A
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2013
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Perthiidae

description: Perthiidae Williams & Barnard, 1988
Type genus. Perthia Straškraba, 1964.
Diagnostic description. Body laterally compressed. Eyes well developed, reniform. Antennae 1–2 calceoli crangonyctoid (type 9). Antenna 1 shorter than or longer than antenna 2; peduncular article 1 longer than article 2; article 2 longer than article 3; article 3 shorter than article 1; peduncular articles 1–2 not geniculate; accessory flagellum short. Antenna 2 peduncular article 1 enlarged, bulbous. Mandible molar non-triturative or with tiny triturating patch; palp symmetrical. Maxilla 1 basal endite apically setose; palps symmetrical. Maxilla 2 basal endite without oblique setal row. Coxal gills on pereopods 2–6, not stalked; sternal gills dendritic; sternal blisters absent; oostegites fringing setae simple. Gnathopod 1 subchelate; dissimilar in males and females (sexually dimorphic); smaller (or weaker) than or similar in size to gnathopod 2; propodus palm without robust setae along palmar margin. Gnathopod 2 subchelate; similar in males and females (not sexually dimorphic); carpus strongly produced along posterior margin of propodus. Pereopods 3–4 not sexually dimorphic. Pereopod 4 with well developed posteroventral lobe. Pereopod 5 shorter than pereopod 6; coxa equilobate or with small anteroventral lobe. Pereopod 7 longer than pereopod 5. Pleonites 1–3 without dorsal carinae. Urosomites 1–3 free; with slender or robust dorsal setae. Urosomite 1 with large distoventral robust seta. Urosomite 2 without dorsal setae. Uropod 1 without basofacial robust setae. Uropod 3 not sexually dimorphic; biramous, without plumose setae; endopod minute or shorter than exopod. Telson deeply cleft; dorsal or lateral robust setae present or absent; apical robust setae present.
Habitat. Freshwater, epigean.
Included genera. Perthia Straškraba, 1964.
Distribution. Temperate Australia.
description: Published as part of Myers, A, 2013, A Phylogeny and Classification of the Senticaudata subord. nov. (Crustacea: Amphipoda), pp. 1-80 in Zootaxa 3610 (1) on page 51, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3610.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/283309
Pseudocrangonyctidae Holsinger 1989
Creators: name: Myers, A
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2013
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Pseudocrangonyctidae

description: Pseudocrangonyctidae Holsinger, 1989
Type genus. Pseudocrangonyx Akatsuka & Komai, 1922.
Diagnostic description. Body subcylindrical. Eyes well developed or absent. Antenna 1 longer than antenna 2; peduncular article 1 longer than article 2; article 2 longer than article 3; article 3 shorter than article 1; peduncular articles 1–2 not geniculate; accessory flagellum minute. Antennae 1–2 calceoli absent. Antenna 2 peduncular article 1 enlarged, bulbous. Mandible molar triturative; palp present, symmetrical. Maxilla 1 basal endite apically setose; palps symmetrical. Maxilla 2 basal endite with oblique setal row. Labium inner lobes vestigial or absent. Coxal gills on pereopods 2–7, stalked with proximal suture; sternal gills present, simple; sternal blisters present or absent; oostegites fringing setae simple. Gnathopod 1 subchelate; dissimilar in males and females (sexually dimorphic); similar in size to, or larger (or stouter) than gnathopod 2; propodus palm with peglike robust setae along palmar margin. Gnathopod 2 subchelate; dissimilar in males and females (sexually dimorphic); carpus not produced along posterior margin of propodus, projecting between merus and propodus. Pereopods 3–4 not sexually dimorphic. Pereopod 4 without posteroventral lobe. Pereopod 5 shorter than pereopod 6; coxa with small anteroventral lobe. Pereopod 7 longer than pereopod 5. Pleonites 1–3 without dorsal carinae. Urosomites 1–3 free; with slender or robust dorsal setae. Urosomite 1 without large distoventral robust seta. Urosomite 2 without dorsal setae. Uropod 1 with 1 or 2 basofacial robust setae. Uropod 3 sexually dimorphic; uniramous, without plumose setae. Telson notched, emarginate or entire; dorsal or lateral robust setae absent; apical robust setae present.
Habitat. Freshwater, hypogean.
Included genera. Procrangonyx Schellenberg, 1934; Pseudocrangonyx Akatsuka & Komai, 1922. Distribution. North-eastern China, eastern Siberia (including the Kamchatka Peninsula), Korea and the Japanese Islands.
description: Published as part of Myers, A, 2013, A Phylogeny and Classification of the Senticaudata subord. nov. (Crustacea: Amphipoda), pp. 1-80 in Zootaxa 3610 (1) on pages 51-52, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3610.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/283309
Setanta nedumalba Heinrich 1974
Creators: name: Riedel, Matthias
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2019
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hymenoptera
Ichneumonidae
Setanta
Setanta nedumalba

description: Setanta nedumalba HEINRICH, 1974
M a t e r i a l: Nepal, environment of Gotichaur, 29°12´10´´N 82°18´56´´E, 2850 m, 1♀ 13.VI.1997, leg. Creutzburg (SDEI); Nepal, Mahangaon Nörd., 29°22´28´´N 82°23´26´´E, 3400 m, Weissschale, 1♀ 20.06.1997, leg. Creutzburg (SDEI).
R e m a r k: The Nepalese material differs from the original description (HEINRICH 1974: 447-448) by wider flagellum (widest flagellomeres c. 1.4x wider than long), completely red fore and mid tibiae and black tegula. One specimen has two short paramedian ivory stripes on mesoscutum and larger ivory spots on facial orbit and gena. The juxtacoxal carina is complete in both specimens. Structure and colouration is otherwise typical, but the colour and flagellar structure seems to be rather variable in S. nedumalba HEINRICH. The separation of S. nedumalba HEINRICH and S. himalayensis (CAMERON) is therefore questionable, and both species might be synonyms.
D i s t r i b u t i o n: Known from Myanmar, new record for Nepal.
description: Published as part of Riedel, Matthias, 2019, Contribution to the Ichneumoninae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) of Nepal, pp. 1119-1162 in Linzer biologische Beiträge 51 (2) on page 1149, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3742020
Ophion wuestneii Kriechbaumer 1892
Creators: name: Johansson, Niklas
name: Cederberg, Björn
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2019
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hymenoptera
Ichneumonidae
Ophion
Ophion wuestneii

description: Ophion wuestneii Kriechbaumer, 1892
Fig. 16 B–C
Ophion wuestneii Kriechbaumer, 1892a:232–233.
Material examined
Holotype, ♂ (ZMUC); 14 ♀♀, 6 ♂♂ (Sweden).
Diagnosis
Fore wing length 12–13 mm. Antenna in both sexes with 55–60 flagellomeres. First flagellomere 4.0–4.5 times as long as wide. Central flagellomeres 1.5 times as long as wide. Head in female narrowed behind eyes, temples slightly more buccate in male. Face in anterior view relatively wide. Malar space about 0.2 times as long as mandibular base in female and about 0.3 times in male. Mandibular gape right-angled, with internal angles. Wing membrane clear. Pterostigma about 3.0 times as long as wide. Ramellus short or absent (Fig. 16B). Discocubitus evenly curved. Radius sinuous. Mesopleuron polished and weakly punctate. Interstices between punctures about 1.5–2 times their diameter. Pleurosternal angles obtuse, well defined, obviously anterior to sternal angles. Scutellum with distinct lateral carinae. Propodeum slightly coriaceous, often quite polished with anterior transverse carina partly absent laterally. Posterior transverse carina often widely interrupted centrally. Area superomedia absent, only weakly indicated posteriorly. Hind trochantellus shorter than wide in dorsal view. Hind femur strongly elongate, about 8.0–9.0 times as long as wide (Fig. 16C). Sclerotised part of first sternite ending distinctly posterior to spiracle. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.3 times as long as hind metatarsus.
Colour
Body testaceous. Head with inner and outer orbits yellow. Mandibular teeth black. Mesoscutum often with brownish areas. Ovipositor sheath testaceous.
DNA barcode
The DNA barcode sequences of three Swedish specimens of Ophion wuestneii are available at the BOLD systems database (www.boldsystems.org, BIN. BOLD: ACS3763. Specimen codes: STI-NJBC: 17, 89, 90).
Ecology
Nothing is known about the hosts of this species. It is active during spring and early summer from late March to early June.
Distribution in Sweden
Rare in the southern parts of the country. Only known from a handful of localities but probably overlooked.
Remarks
Ophion wuestneii might be confused with smaller specimens of O. scutellaris, but is easily separated by the characters given in the key.
description: Published as part of Johansson, Niklas & Cederberg, Björn, 2019, Review of the Swedish species of Ophion (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Ophioninae), with the description of 18 new species and an illustrated key to Swedish species, pp. 1-136 in European Journal of Taxonomy 550 on pages 111-112, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2019.550, http://zenodo.org/record/3476402
Sandroidae Lowry & Myers 2012
Creators: name: Myers, A
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2013
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Sandroidae

description: Sandroidae Lowry & Myers, 2012
Type genus. Sandro Karaman & Barnard, 1979.
Diagnostic description. Body laterally compressed. Eyes apparently absent. Antennae 1–2 calceoli absent. Antenna 1 longer than antenna 2; peduncular article 1 subequal to, or longer than article 2; article 2 longer than article 3; article 3 longer than article 1; peduncular articles 1–2 not geniculate; accessory flagellum minute. Antenna 2 peduncular article 1 enlarged, bulbous. Mandible molar triturative; palp symmetrical. Maxilla 1 basal endite without setae; palps symmetrical. Maxilla 2 basal endite without oblique setal row. Labium inner lobes present. Coxal gills on pereopods 3–7, not stalked; sternal gills absent; sternal blisters absent; oostegites fringing setae simple. Gnathopod 1 subchelate; similar in males and females (not sexually dimorphic); similar in size to gnathopod 2; propodus palm without robust setae along palmar margin. Gnathopod 2 subchelate; carpus slightly produced along posterior margin of propodus. Pereopods 3–4 not sexually dimorphic. Pereopod 4 with well developed posteroventral lobe. Pereopod 5 shorter than pereopod 6; coxa with small posterodorsal lobe. Pereopod 7 longer than pereopod 5. Pleonites 1–3 without dorsal carinae. Urosomites 1–3 coalesced; with sparse slender or robust dorsal setae. Urosomite 1 with large distoventral robust seta. Urosomite 2 without dorsal setae. Uropod 1 without basofacial robust setae. Uropod 3 sexually dimorphic; biramous, without plumose setae; endopod minute. Telson deeply cleft; dorsal or lateral robust setae absent; apical robust setae present.
Habitat. Freshwater, epigean.
Included genera. Sandro Karaman & Barnard, 1979.
Distribution. Madagascar.
description: Published as part of Myers, A, 2013, A Phylogeny and Classification of the Senticaudata subord. nov. (Crustacea: Amphipoda), pp. 1-80 in Zootaxa 3610 (1) on page 52, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3610.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/283309
Sternophysingidae Holsinger 1992
Creators: name: Myers, A
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2013
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Sternophysingidae

description: Sternophysingidae Holsinger, 1992
Type genus. Sternophysinx Holsinger & Straškraba, 1973.
Diagnostic description. Body laterally compressed. Eyes absent. Antennae 1–2 calceoli crangonyctoid (type 9). Antenna 1 longer than antenna 2; peduncular article 1 longer than article 2; article 2 longer than article 3; article 3 shorter than article 1; peduncular articles 1–2 not geniculate; accessory flagellum minute. Antenna 2 peduncular article 1 enlarged, bulbous. Mandible molar triturative; palp symmetrical. Maxilla 1 basal endite apically setose; palps symmetrical. Maxilla 2 basal endite without oblique setal row. Labium inner lobes present. Coxal gills on pereopods 2–6, stalked (with proximal restriction or complete suture); sternal gills present, simple; sternal blisters present; oostegites fringing setae simple. Gnathopod 1 subchelate; dissimilar in males and females (sexually dimorphic); similar in size to, or larger (or stouter) than gnathopod 2; propodus palm without robust setae along palmar margin. Gnathopod 2 subchelate; similar in males and females (not sexually dimorphic); carpus not produced along posterior margin of propodus, projecting between merus and propodus. Pereopods 3–4 not sexually dimorphic. Pereopod 4 with small posteroventral lobe. Pereopod 5 shorter than pereopod 6; coxa with small anteroventral lobe. Pereopod 7 longer than pereopod 5. Pleonites 1–3 without dorsal carinae. Urosomites 1–3 free; with slender or robust dorsal setae. Urosomite 1 with large distoventral robust seta. Urosomite 2 without dorsal setae. Uropod 1 without basofacial robust setae. Uropod 3 not sexually dimorphic; biramous, without plumose setae; endopod minute. Telson notched or emarginate; dorsal or lateral robust setae absent; apical robust setae present.
Habitat. Freshwater, hypogean.
Included genera. Sternophysinx Holsinger & Straškraba, 1973.
Distribution. South Africa.
description: Published as part of Myers, A, 2013, A Phylogeny and Classification of the Senticaudata subord. nov. (Crustacea: Amphipoda), pp. 1-80 in Zootaxa 3610 (1) on page 52, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3610.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/283309
Uronyctidae Lowry & Myers 2012
Creators: name: Myers, A
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2013
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Uronyctidae

description: Uronyctidae Lowry & Myers, 2012
Type genus. Uronyctus Stock & Iliffe, 1990.
Diagnostic description. Body subcylindrical or vermiform. Eyes absent. Antennae 1–2 calceoli absent. Antenna 1 longer than antenna 2; peduncular article 1 shorter than article 2; article 2 longer than article 3; article 3 shorter than article 1; peduncular articles 1–2 not geniculate; accessory flagellum short. Antenna 2 peduncular article 1 enlarged, bulbous. Mandible molar triturating; palp symmetrical. Maxilla 1 basal endite setose along medial margin; palps symmetrical. Maxilla 2 basal endite with oblique setal row. Coxal gills on pereopods 2–7, stalked (with proximal restriction or complete suture); sternal gills present, simple; sternal blisters absent; oostegites fringing setae simple. Gnathopod 1 subchelate; sexually dimorphic [not known]; smaller (or weaker) than gnathopod 2; propodus palm with row or rows of simple or bifid robust setae along palmar margin. Gnathopod 2 subchelate; sexual dimorphism [not known]; carpus not produced along posterior margin of propodus, projecting between merus and propodus. Pereopods 3–4 not sexually dimorphic. Pereopod 4 without posteroventral lobe. Pereopod 5 shorter than pereopod 6; coxa with posterodorsal lobe. Pereopod 7 longer than pereopod 5. Pleonites 1–3 without dorsal carinae. Urosomites 1–3 free; without slender or robust dorsal setae. Urosomite 1 with large distoventral robust seta. Urosomite 2 without dorsal setae. Uropod 1 without basofacial robust setae. Uropod 3 not sexually dimorphic; uniramous, without plumose setae. Telson moderately cleft; dorsal or lateral robust setae absent; apical robust setae present.
Habitat. Freshwater hypogean.
Included genera. Uronyctus Stock & Iliffe, 1990.
Distribution. Temperate Australia.
description: Published as part of Myers, A, 2013, A Phylogeny and Classification of the Senticaudata subord. nov. (Crustacea: Amphipoda), pp. 1-80 in Zootaxa 3610 (1) on page 53, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3610.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/283309
title: A comparative study of proton exchange membranes: performance, stability and hydrogen crossover
Creators: name: Pitman, Alex
Publisher: name: University of Glasgow
Year: 2024

description: Proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE) presents itself as an attractive tool to support the renewable energy transition. By coupling these technologies together, a clean and environmentally friendly route to hydrogen production is created. Hydrogen can then act as an energy vector, delivering power areas where it is needed most. At the heart of the technology lies the proton exchange membrane (PEM) – a polymer that acts as a solid electrolyte, thus allowing protons to permeate through the device. The benchmark membrane is the Nafion™ brand, which has backbone similar to polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and a long fluorinated carbon side chain capped with sulfonic groups. Aquivion® is another brand of membrane – similar to Nafion™, only that the side chain is shorter in length. Despite these membranes competing in identical markets, there are few existing comparative studies regarding their use in water electrolysis. The data that is available suggests the short side chain of Aquivion® yields optimal properties. Unfortunately, in recent months both of these membranes have been discontinued by many leading retailers, leaving researchers with no tried and tested membrane available for use.

This project investigated both of these issues. Aquivion® and Nafion™ were evaluated across three key parameters – performance, degradation rate and hydrogen crossover - and compared against an unbranded commercially available membrane. The results showed that the use of a short side chain membrane did not significantly vary device operation across the three key parameters, and also showed the unbranded membrane to perform at levels similar to the branded membranes. Ex-situ characterisation revealed the presence of membrane degradation after device operation. Future experiments could see the unbranded membrane being tested at timescales required in an industrial electrolyser.
Using Big Data Analytics to Improve Logistics Processes and Forecast Demand
Creators: name: Iryna Perevozova
name: Taras Gubernat
name: Lukian Hontar
name: Vitaliy Shayban
name: Nadiia Bocharova
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2024
Subjects: Supply Chain Optimisation, Machine Learning Algorithms, Inventory Management, Logistics Improvement, Data Analysis, Information Technology In Logistics, Analytical Modelling, Demand Forecasting

description: This study is relevant due to the increasing necessity to enhance the efficiency of logistics operations amidst rapid digitalization and globalization of markets. Our research aims to investigate the application of Big Data analytics in optimizing logistics processes and demand forecasting. The study employed diverse methodologies such as literature review, systematic terminology development, surveys, and graphical and tabular data visualization techniques. It underscores that Big Data analytics in supply chains involves leveraging various tools, processing systems, and algorithms to analyze voluminous data effectively. Traditionally, supply chain management (SCM) systems rely on ERP and other separate systems for data storage. However, the advent of analytics enables data integration, fostering more efficient decision-making processes. Big Data is profoundly impacting every facet of the supply chain. During the planning phase, integrated data across the network enhances demand prediction through statistical models. The results revealed that many Ukrainian logistics firms have begun adopting Big Data analytics. Specifically, they are leveraging it to optimize delivery routes, manage inventory based on demand forecasts, and evaluate warehouse operations' efficiency. This initiative contributes to cost savings in transportation, enhances forecasting accuracy by 10-15%, and reduces delivery times by a similar margin. However, the study underscores the challenges associated with managing large datasets and emphasizes the critical need for well-trained staff to effectively handle these analytics. Despite these challenges, most companies recognize Big Data analytics as pivotal in their logistics management strategies, enabling more efficient resolution of complex problems. The article concludes that domestic companies possess substantial potential to enhance their logistics processes through the adoption of Big Data analytics but must first address existing challenges. To achieve successful implementation, continuous improvement of technological and organizational processes is essential, alongside ensuring high-quality data collection and analysis. These findings hold practical significance as they provide Ukrainian logistics companies with insights into the benefits and challenges of leveraging Big Data analytics. This understanding will facilitate the development of effective strategies to bolster competitiveness and streamline logistics operations.