Tetralobistes weddellii H. Milne Edwards 1848, new combination
Creators: name: Ayón-Parente, Manuel
name: Hendrickx, Michel E.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2013
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Decapoda
Diogenidae
Tetralobistes
Tetralobistes weddellii

description: Tetralobistes weddellii (H. Milne Edwards, 1848) new combination
Pagurus weddellii H. Milne Edwards, 1848: 64 (type locality, shores of Peru).
Paguristes weddellii.—Kinahan, 1857: 350.—Alcock 1905: 156.—Rathbun, 1910: 555, 596, pl. 51, fig. 2.— Gordan 1956: 324.—McLaughlin et al. 2010: 23.
Paguristes weddelli.—Stimpson, 1858: 236.—Haig, 1955: 16.—Retamal, 1981: 19, 57, fig. 65.—Retamal & Jara, 2002: 205 (list).—Ayón-Parente & Hendrickx, 2010a: 4.
Paguristes weddelli.—Mantelatto et al., 2009: 22.
Material examined. Male holotype (SL 22 mm), Peru (no specific locality, no date of collection), catalogue number MNHN-Pg. 1699 (photographs); one male (SL 13.82 mm) and one female (SL 8.27 mm), Los Molinos, Valdivia, Chile, May 0 3 2005, CCDB/FFCLRP/USP # 809.
Redescription. Thirteen pairs of biserial gills (Fig. 1 A). Shield (Figs. 1 B, 4A, C) longer than broad; anterolateral margins sloping; anterior margins between rostrum and lateral projections concave to almost straight; posterior margin convex; middle part of dorsal surface smooth with tufts of short setae, middle of anterior surface with tubercles and short transverse rows of spines near to lateral margins, both tubercles and spines accompanied by tufts of long setae. Rostrum short, slender, sharply triangular, equal or slightly exceeding lateral projections, reaching basis of ocular acicles. Lateral projections bluntly triangular, each armed with one small or moderately large marginal spine. Branchiostegites with small spines or spinules on dorsal and distal margins, concealed by tufts of long setae.
Ocular peduncles (Figs. 1 B, 4A, C) cylindrical, long, 0.67 shield length, broader basally; cornea weakly dilated, corneal diameter 0.10 length of peduncles. Ocular acicles long, subtriangular or subrectangular, broader basally, contiguous along their mesial margin and terminating in large spines, lateral margin armed with 6 or 7 spines, mesial margin unarmed.
Antennular peduncles (Fig. 1 B, 4A, C) long, when totally extended exceeding by 0.33 length of ocular peduncles; ultimate and penultimate segments unarmed, with few tufts of long setae; basal segment with small spine at ventrodistal margin, lateral face with moderately strong spine on middorsal margin, distal margin with small spine concealed by long setae.
Antennal peduncles (Fig. 1 B) with supernumerary segment, long, usually reaching basis of cornea; fifth segment with scattered tufts of setae on dorsal and ventral surfaces; fourth segment with 2 very small or minute spines at dorsodistal margin; third segment with ventrodistal margin rounded, not produced, with 1 small spine at inner distal margin; second segment with laterodistal angle produced, terminating in large corneous-tipped spine, lateral margin usually with 2 minute corneous spines; mesiodistal angle with large corneous-tipped spine, mesial margin setose; first segment unarmed. Antennal acicles triangular, reaching proximal third of ultimate antennal segment, terminating in simple or bifid spines and with spines on mesial margin; mesial margin armed with row of 11–13 large, corneous-tipped spines, partially concealed by long setae, lateral margin unarmed. Antennal flagella (Fig. 1 B) short, slightly longer than shield; each article with very long, paired setae ventrally.
Mandible without distinguishing characters. Maxillule (Fig. 2 A) with proximal endite subquadrate, distal endite subrectangular, enlarged distally; endopod with 2 apical bristles on weakly produced internal lobe, external lobe well developed, recurved, approximately 0.67 length of endopod. Maxilla (Fig. 2 B) with endopod moderately long, not exceeding scaphognathite in distal extension. First maxilliped (Fig. 2 C) with endopod large, reaching distal end of basal segment of exopod; proximal segment of exopod subtriangular, tapering distally; flagellum very short; epipod well developed. Second maxilliped (Fig. 2 D) with basis-ischium fusion incomplete. Third maxilliped (Fig. 2 E, F) with basis-ischium fusion incomplete; basis with 3 spines, partially obscured by tufts of setae; ischium with crista dentata well developed, 1 small spine at ventrolaterodistal margin, without accesory tooth; merus with 2 minute spines on ventrolateral distal margin, dorsodistal margin with 2 small or mintute spines; carpus, propodus and dactyl unarmed.
Chelipeds (Fig. 1 C–E) short, similar in shape, equal or slightly unequal, pilose. Dactyls moderately long, 1.33 times as long as palms, terminating in moderately large or large corneous-tipped claw overlapped by fixed finger; cutting edge with row of corneous teeth; dorsomesial margin not well defined, with 2 irregular rows of large corneous-tipped spines and tufts of long setae; dorsal surface with 2 irregular longitudinal rows of large simple or bifid spines, accompanied by tufts of long setae; mesial surface with irregular vertical rows of corneous-tipped spines; ventromesial margin with row of large, corneous-tipped spines accompanied by tufts of long setae. Palm with row of 4 to 5 moderate to prominent spines acompanied with 1 to 2 smaller spines and tufts of long plumose setae on dorsomesial margin, dorsolateral margin arcuate with row of prominent spines extending on fixed finger, each spines acompanied by 1 to 2 smaller spines and tufts of long plumose setae; weakly convex dorsal surface with 5 to 6 irregular rows of large spines, each spine fringed anteriorly with small corneous spines forming a semicrown and tufts of long plumose setae, 3 rows extending nearly entire length of fixed finger; lateral surface with 2 rows of spines and tufts of setae; mesial face with row of moderately large spines near dorsomesial margin, distal and subdistal margins with corneous-tipped spines, ventral surface with rows of spine-like tubercles and tufts of setae, one row extending the entire length of fixed finger; cutting edge of fixed finger with row of corneous teeth, terminating in large, corneous-tipped claw. Carpus with row of 6 to 7 prominent spines on dorsomesial margin, dorsal surface with irregular, longitudinal rows of smaller spine-like tubercles bearing 1 to 3 corneous spines, distal margin spiny, lateral margin weakly delimited with row of small to moderately large spines, each accompanied by tuft of long plumose setae; lateral surface with several spine-like tubercles acompannied by tufts of setae, ventrolateral angle with 2 moderately large spines; mesial surface with numerous distal spines. Merus subtriangular in dorsal view; dorsal face with row of small spines increasing in size and becoming transverse rows of moderately large spines distally, often corneous-tipped spines distally, accompanied by tufts of long setae, distal margin with row of moderately large, corneous-tipped spines extending on lateral and mesial margins; lateral surface spinulose, larger spines near ventral margin, ventromesial and ventrolateral margins each with double irregular row of small spines and long setae, smallest usually laterally, ventral surface with scattered small spines and tufts of long setae. Ischium with 1 to 2 small spines on ventromesial margin; laterodistal and dorsolaterodistal margins spiny.
Second (Figs 3 A, B, 4C) and third (Figs 3 D, 4C) pereopods similar, somewhat different in armature. Dactyls 1.34–1.56 length of propodi; dorsal margins each with row of semi-circular, flattened tubercles crowned with sharp spines (Fig. 3 C) decreasing in size distally and concealed by tufts of long setae; mesial faces each with few spinelike tubercles accompanied by tufts of long setae, dorsomesial and ventromesial margins each with longitudinal rows of irregular, flattened tubercles bearing 1–3 corneous-tipped spines and tufts of long setae, ventral margins each with 11–13 corneous spines increasing in size distally; lateral faces each with few flattened, spine-like tubercles proximally, an oblique row of flattened tubercles bearing 2–4 corneous-tipped spines, begining proximally on middle surface and ending distally on dorsolateral margin, ventrolateral margins each with longitudinal row of flattened tubercles bearing 1–4 triangular, corneous-tipped spines and tufts of long setae; ending in large corneous claw. Propodi each with row of semi-circular, flattened tubercles, crowned with sharp spines (larger on second) concealed by tufts of long setae; mesial faces each with numerous spine-like tubercles bearing 1–4 triangular, corneous-tipped spines and tufts of long setae, lateral faces each with longitudinal row of spine-like tubercles (larger on second), dorsolateral margins each with longitudinal row of semi-circular, flattened tubercles crowned with sharp spines, spines larger on second pereopods, ventral faces each with 2–3 longitudial rows of irregular spine-like tubercles bearing 1–3 triangular, corneous-tipped spines. Carpi each with 2 irregular longitudinal rows of spine-like tubercles bearing 2–4 corneous-tipped spines (larger on second) concealed by tufts of long setae, mesial faces each with few spine-like tubercles near dorsal margin, accompanied by tufts of long setae, distal margin with small, corneous-tipped spines extending on ventral margin, lateral surfaces each with few spine-like tubercles accompanied by tufts of long setae, ventrolateral margins each with row of semi-circular, flattened tubercles crowned with sharp spines, spines larger on second pereopods, ventral surfaces each with spiny tubercles and spine-like tubercles on distal two-thirds. Meri each with dorsal row of spine-like tubercles proximally, becoming spines distally, and tufts of long setae, dorsosubdistal margin with corneous-tipped spines extending on mesial face, ventromesial margins each with corneous-tipped spines (larger on second) and tufts of plumose setae, ventrolateral margins each with only tufts of long plumose setae (third) or with low, spine-like tubercles and tufts of long plumose setae, lateral faces each with numerous low tubercles bearing small, corneoustipped spines and tufts of long setae. Ischia each with 1–4 small corneous-tipped spines on ventromesial margin concealed by tufts of long plumose setae, lateral face with tubercles accompanied by tufts of long setae (third) or with small corneous spines and tufts of long setae (second), dorsal surface with low tubercles bearing small corneous spines and tufts of long setae.
Sternite XII (third pereopods) (Fig. 1 F) with anterior lobe subrectangular, bearing pair of protuberances and tufts of long setae.
Fourth pereopods (Fig. 3 E, F) setose. Dactyls each with long, slender preungual process at base of claw; 3 large corneous spines on ventrolateral margin posterior to claw; inner face with two large scale-like spines; dorsal margin with 3 large corneous spines distally preceeded by 2 smaller spines on distal third. Propodi with several rows of ovate scales in propodal rasp. Carpi and meri unarmed.
Pleopods of male with first and second pairs modified as gonopod (Fig. 1 G–J). Basal lobe with tufts of setae on mesial and outer margins; inferior lamella with row of setae on outer margin, distal margin with row of bifid and multifid corneous, curved spines extending down mesial face; internal lobe with marginal setae. Second pleopods with elongate basal segment, with few setae; endopod with few plumose setae on inner margin; appendix masculina with long setae marginally and on inner face. Third to fifth left pleopods without endopods. Female with paired gonopores, without first paired pleopods, second to fourth pleopods with both rami well developed, fifth pleopod as in male; brood pouch represented by row of setae.
Telson (Figs. 1 K, 4B, D) with posterior margin divided in 4 lobes; outer left lobe longer than outer right, subrectangular, armed with 3 or 4 distal spines and 5 lateral spines; middle lobes subquadrate, each with 5–7 small spines; outer right lobe subtriangular, distal margin with 3 spines, lateral margin with 3–5 strong spines; anterior section of telson separated from posterior section by indentation, weakly bilobate, lobes unarmed with tufts of long setae.
Color. H. Milne Edwards (1848) described the color of this species as “couleur rouge-brun foncée”. Perhaps this description was based on preserved specimen, because Zúñiga-Romero (2002) mentioned that (fresh) specimens are white-grayish, with chelipeds yellow. The preserved specimens examined herein present an orangeyellowish color, but in life they present a mixing of white and brown colors, with abundant pilosity.
Habitat. Collected on sandy substrate, 5–18 m depth; adults are found on estuarine shallow waters, but no information on juvenile is available (Haig 1955; Zagal & Hermosilla 2007; LM Pardo & FL Mantelatto, pers. com.)
Distribution. From Sechura Bay, Peru, to Smith Channel, Territory of Magallanes, Chile (Haig 1955; Retamal 1981).
Notes on Paguristes hirtus Dana, 1851. Paguristes weddellii was originally described by H. Milne Edwards (1848) from “shores of Peru ” (as Pagurus). Paguristes hirtus was described by Dana (1851) from “shores of Chile ”. In the same contribution, Dana (1851) also described the genus Paguristes but failed to designate a type species for it. It is only seven years later that Stimpson (1858: 235) subsequently designated P. h ir t us as the type of Paguristes. While the type material of P. weddellii is still available and in excellent conditions, the specimen used by Dana to describe P. hi r tu s has long been lost. In her monograph on the Anomura of Chile, Haig (1955: 16) considered the latter as a subjective junior synonym of P. weddellii. In order to justify her proposal, she requested the opinion of Prof. J. Forest, member of the staff of the MNHN at that time, who examined the type of weddellii (see Haig, 1955: 17) and came to the conclusion that P. h i r t u s was identical to weddellii. However, considering that none of these two carcinologists were able to examine the type material of hirtus and that the original description of both “ Paguristes weddellii ” and P. hirtus is very short and imprecise compared to present day species descriptions, we believe that the proposal of Haig lacked sustainment and we therefore remove Paguristes hirtus, the type species of Paguristes, from the synonymy of “ Pagurus weddellii ”.
Remarks. The present specimens from Valdivia, Chile, agreed well with short descriptions of Paguristes weddellii by H. Milne Edwards (1848; as Pagurus) and Rathbun (1910). The type of Paguristes weddellii from Peru was not available for direct examination, but Laure Corbari (MNHN) sent us photographs of it (Fig. 4 A, B). While comparing the holotype photographs with our material from Chile, it became obvious that the shield, the ocular acicles and peduncles, the antennal acicles (Fig. 4 A) and, above all, the telson (Fig.4 B) (tetralobular as in the type species of the genus Tetralobistes) of our specimens perfectly match the holotype, and we became confident that the Chilean specimens are conspecific with the holotype.
Examination of the specimens from Chile has disclosed that Paguristes weddellii shares many characteristic with Tetralobistes bicentenarius, including a short rostrum, ocular acicles with mesial margins contiguous, antennal flagella with long setae ventrally, chelipeds with fingertips acuminate, and modified male first pleopods with distal margin of the inferior lamella bearing a row of simple, bifid and multifid, corneous, curved spines. In addition, in female T. weddellii the first pleopods and the brood pouch are absent (represented by a row of long setae), as in T. bicentenarius. The characteristic telson is strickingly similar, with a posterior margin divided into four lobes, a character unique among the genera of Diogenidae (see Ayón-Parente & Hendrickx 2010b). Consequently, we transfer Paguristes weddellii to Tetralobistes.
When Rahayu (2005) divided Paguristes s.l. into three genera, she indicated the presence of 13 pairs of gills in the type specimen of T. weddellii (as Paguristes), but without further details. Mantelatto et al. (2009) revised the taxonomy of Pagurus forceps H. Milne Edwards, 1836 and P. c o m p t u s White, 1847, and presented an analysis of 16S ribosomal gene sequences of these two species and of a series of species of Diogenidae, including Paguristes weddellii. Their results show all species of Diogenidae forming a single clade, with P. weddellii close to two pairs of Paguristes, yet clearly separated from these four species. This supports our proposal to withdraw P. weddellii from Paguristes.
Tetralobistes bicentenarius and T. weddellii n. comb., can be separated by the following characters: in T. bicentenarius the antennal acicles each with 3–6 spines on mesial margin, in lieu of 11–13 spines; antennular peduncles proporcionally longer (0.75–0.80 versus 0.33); telson with middle lobes bearing 11–13 versus 5–7 spines. Armature of chelipeds and walk legs, just as the colour also showing differences between these two species. In Tetralobistes bicentenarius the second pleopods are absent but are present in T. weddellii, thus increasing the variability of the genus Tetralobistes (“second pleopods present or absent in males”) as diagnosed by Ayón-Parente & Hendrickx (2010b).
description: Published as part of Ayón-Parente, Manuel & Hendrickx, Michel E., 2013, Redescription and taxonomic status of Paguristes weddellii (H. Milne Edwards) (Crustacea: Anomura: Paguroidea: Diogenidae) from the eastern Pacific, pp. 587-596 in Zootaxa 3616 (6) on pages 588-595, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3616.6.5, http://zenodo.org/record/216130