title: ÐÐ½ÑÐµÑÐ¿ÑÐµÑÐ°ÑÐ¸Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ð½ÑÑÐ¸Ñ Â«Ð¿Ð¾Ð³ÑÐµÑÐ½Ð¾ÑÑÑ Ð¸Ð·Ð¼ÐµÑÐµÐ½Ð¸ÑÂ» Ð² Ð°ÑÐ±Ð¸ÑÑÐ°Ð¶Ð½Ð¾Ð¼ Ð¿ÑÐ¾ÑÐµÑÑÐµ
title: Ð²ÑÐ¿ÑÑÐºÐ½Ð°Ñ ÐºÐ²Ð°Ð»Ð¸ÑÐ¸ÐºÐ°ÑÐ¸Ð¾Ð½Ð½Ð°Ñ ÑÐ°Ð±Ð¾ÑÐ° ÑÐ¿ÐµÑÐ¸Ð°Ð»Ð¸ÑÑÐ°
titleType: Subtitle
title: Interpretation of the concept of "measurement error" in the arbitration process
Creators: name: ÐÐ¾ÑÐ¾Ð·Ð¾Ð², Ð¢Ð¸Ð¼Ð¾ÑÐµÐ¹
Publisher: name: Ð¡Ð°Ð½ÐºÑ-ÐÐµÑÐµÑÐ±ÑÑÐ³ÑÐºÐ¸Ð¹ Ð¿Ð¾Ð»Ð¸ÑÐµÑÐ½Ð¸ÑÐµÑÐºÐ¸Ð¹ ÑÐ½Ð¸Ð²ÐµÑÑÐ¸ÑÐµÑ ÐÐµÑÑÐ° ÐÐµÐ»Ð¸ÐºÐ¾Ð³Ð¾
Year: 2023
Subjects: Ð¿Ð¾Ð³ÑÐµÑÐ½Ð¾ÑÑÑ Ð¸Ð·Ð¼ÐµÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ
Ð¼ÐµÑÑÐ¾Ð»Ð¾Ð³Ð¸Ñ
ÑÑÐ´ÐµÐ±Ð½Ð°Ñ ÑÐºÑÐ¿ÐµÑÑÐ¸Ð·Ð°
measurement error
metrology
forensics examination

description: ÐÐ°Ð½Ð½Ð°Ñ ÑÐ°Ð±Ð¾ÑÐ° Ð¿Ð¾ÑÐ²ÑÑÐµÐ½Ð° Ð¸Ð·ÑÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ ÑÐ°ÐºÐ¾Ð³Ð¾ Ð¿Ð¾Ð½ÑÑÐ¸Ñ ÐºÐ°Ðº Ð¿Ð¾Ð³ÑÐµÑÐ½Ð¾ÑÑÑ Ð¸Ð·Ð¼ÐµÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ, Ð² Ð°ÑÐ±Ð¸ÑÑÐ°Ð¶Ð½Ð¾Ð¼ Ð¿ÑÐ¾ÑÐµÑÑÐµ Ð¸ Ð² ÑÐµÐ»Ð¾Ð¼, Ð·Ð½Ð°ÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ðµ Ð´Ð°Ð½Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ Ð¿Ð¾Ð½ÑÑÐ¸Ñ Ð´Ð»Ñ ÑÑÐ´ÐµÐ±Ð½Ð¾-ÑÐµÑÐ½Ð¸ÑÐµÑÐºÐ¾Ð¹ ÑÐºÑÐ¿ÐµÑÑÐ¸Ð·Ñ. Ð Ð°ÑÑÐ¼Ð¾ÑÑÐµÐ½, Ð¸Ð·ÑÑÐµÐ½ Ð¸ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð°Ð½Ð°Ð»Ð¸Ð·Ð¸ÑÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½ ÑÐ¸ÑÐ¾ÐºÐ¸Ð¹ Ð¿ÐµÑÐµÑÐµÐ½Ñ ÑÑÐ´ÐµÐ±Ð½Ð¾Ð¹ Ð¿ÑÐ°ÐºÑÐ¸ÐºÐ¸, ÐºÐ°ÑÐ°ÑÑÐ¸Ð¹ÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾Ð½ÑÑÐ¸Ñ Â«Ð¿Ð¾Ð³ÑÐµÑÐ½Ð¾ÑÑÑÂ» Ð² ÑÑÐ´ÐµÐ±Ð½Ð¾Ð¹ ÑÐºÑÐ¿ÐµÑÑÐ¸Ð·Ðµ, Ð° ÑÐ°ÐºÐ¶Ðµ Ð¼ÐµÐ¶Ð³Ð¾ÑÑÐ´Ð°ÑÑÑÐ²ÐµÐ½Ð½ÑÐµ ÑÑÐ°Ð½Ð´Ð°ÑÑÑ ÐÐÐ¡Ð¢, Ð½Ð¾ÑÐ¼Ð°ÑÐ¸Ð²Ð½Ð¾ Ð¿ÑÐ°Ð²Ð¾Ð²ÑÐµ Ð°ÐºÑÑ Ð¸ Ð¼ÐµÐ¶Ð´ÑÐ½Ð°ÑÐ¾Ð´Ð½Ð¾Ðµ Ð ÑÐºÐ¾Ð²Ð¾Ð´ÑÑÐ²Ð¾ Ð¿Ð¾ Ð²ÑÑÐ°Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð½ÐµÐ¾Ð¿ÑÐµÐ´ÐµÐ»ÐµÐ½Ð½Ð¾ÑÑÐ¸ Ð² Ð¸Ð·Ð¼ÐµÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ð¸, ÐºÐ°ÑÐ°ÑÑÐ¸ÐµÑÑ ÑÐ°ÐºÐ¾Ð³Ð¾ Ð¿Ð¾Ð½ÑÑÐ¸Ñ ÐºÐ°Ðº Â«Ð¿Ð¾Ð³ÑÐµÑÐ½Ð¾ÑÑÑ Ð¸Ð·Ð¼ÐµÑÐµÐ½Ð¸ÑÂ». ÐÐ·ÑÑÐµÐ½Ð¾ Ð¸ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð°Ð½Ð°Ð»Ð¸Ð·Ð¸ÑÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¾ ÑÐ°ÐºÐ¾Ðµ Ð¿Ð¾Ð½ÑÑÐ¸Ðµ ÐºÐ°Ðº Â«ÑÑÐ°Ð½Ð´Ð°ÑÑÐ¸Ð·Ð°ÑÐ¸ÑÂ», ÐµÐµ ÑÐ¾Ð»Ñ Ð² ÑÑÐ´ÐµÐ±Ð½Ð¾-ÑÐºÑÐ¿ÐµÑÑÐ½Ð¾Ð¹ Ð´ÐµÑÑÐµÐ»ÑÐ½Ð¾ÑÑÐ¸. Ð¦ÐµÐ»ÑÑ Ð´Ð°Ð½Ð½Ð¾Ð¹ ÑÐ°Ð±Ð¾ÑÑ Ð·Ð°ÐºÐ»ÑÑÐ°ÐµÑÑÑ Ð² ÑÐ¾Ð¼, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ ÑÐ°ÑÑÐ¼Ð¾ÑÑÐµÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾Ð½ÑÑÐ¸Ðµ Ð¿Ð¾Ð³ÑÐµÑÐ½Ð¾ÑÑÑ Ð¸Ð·Ð¼ÐµÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð² Ð°ÑÐ±Ð¸ÑÑÐ°Ð¶Ð½Ð¾Ð¼ Ð¿ÑÐ¾ÑÐµÑÑÐµ, ÑÐ¾ ÐºÐ°ÐºÐ¾Ðµ Ð²Ð»Ð¸ÑÐ½Ð¸Ðµ Ð¾Ð½Ð° Ð¾ÐºÐ°Ð·ÑÐ²Ð°ÐµÑ Ð½Ð° ÑÐµÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ðµ ÑÑÐ´Ð° Ð¸ ÐºÐ°Ðº Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÑ Ð¸Ð½ÑÐµÑÐ¿ÑÐµÑÐ¸ÑÐ¾Ð²Ð°ÑÑÑÑ, Ð° ÑÐ°ÐºÐ¶Ðµ Ð² Ð¸Ð·ÑÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ð¸ ÑÐ¾Ð»Ð¸ ÑÐºÑÐ¿ÐµÑÑÐ¸Ð·Ñ Ð² Ð°ÑÐ±Ð¸ÑÑÐ°Ð¶Ð½Ð¾Ð¼ Ð¿ÑÐ¾ÑÐµÑÑÐµ, Ð²ÑÑÐ²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ð¸ Ð°ÐºÑÑÐ°Ð»ÑÐ½ÑÑ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð±Ð»ÐµÐ¼ Ð² ÑÑÐ¾Ð¹ Ð¾Ð±Ð»Ð°ÑÑÐ¸ Ð¸ Ð¿ÑÐµÐ´Ð»Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿ÑÑÐµÐ¹ Ð¸Ñ ÑÐµÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ. ÐÐ»Ñ Ð´Ð¾ÑÑÐ¸Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð´Ð°Ð½Ð½Ð¾Ð¹ ÑÐµÐ»Ð¸ Ð±ÑÐ»Ð¸ ÑÐµÑÐµÐ½Ñ ÑÐ»ÐµÐ´ÑÑÑÐ¸Ðµ Ð·Ð°Ð´Ð°ÑÐ¸: 1. ÐÐ½Ð°Ð»Ð¸Ð· Ð¿Ð¾Ð½ÑÑÐ¸Ñ Â«Ð¿Ð¾Ð³ÑÐµÑÐ½Ð¾ÑÑÑ Ð¸Ð·Ð¼ÐµÑÐµÐ½Ð¸ÑÂ» Ð² Ð°ÑÐ±Ð¸ÑÑÐ°Ð¶Ð½Ð¾Ð¼ Ð¿ÑÐ¾ÑÐµÑÑÐµ 2. Ð¡ÑÐ°Ð²Ð½ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ðµ Ð¸Ð½ÑÐµÑÐ¿ÑÐµÑÐ°ÑÐ¸Ð¸ Ð¿Ð¾Ð½ÑÑÐ¸Ñ Â«Ð¿Ð¾Ð³ÑÐµÑÐ½Ð¾ÑÑÑ Ð¸Ð·Ð¼ÐµÑÐµÐ½Ð¸ÑÂ» ÑÑÐ´Ð¾Ð¼, Ñ ÐµÐ³Ð¾ ÑÑÐ½Ð´Ð°Ð¼ÐµÐ½ÑÐ°Ð»ÑÐ½ÑÐ¼ Ð¿Ð¾Ð½ÑÑÐ¸ÐµÐ¼; 3. Ð¡ÑÐ°Ð²Ð½ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ðµ Ð¿Ð¾Ð½ÑÑÐ¸Ð¹ Â«Ð¿Ð¾Ð³ÑÐµÑÐ½Ð¾ÑÑÑ Ð¸Ð·Ð¼ÐµÑÐµÐ½Ð¸ÑÂ» Ñ ÑÐ°ÐºÐ¸Ð¼Ð¸ Ð¿Ð¾Ð½ÑÑÐ¸ÑÐ¼Ð¸ ÐºÐ°Ðº Â«Ð½ÐµÐ¾Ð¿ÑÐµÐ´ÐµÐ»ÐµÐ½Ð½Ð¾ÑÑÑÂ» Ð¸ Â«Ð¾ÑÐ¸Ð±ÐºÐ°Â»; 4. ÐÐ½Ð°Ð»Ð¸Ð· Ð¿Ð¾Ð½ÑÑÐ¸Ñ, ÑÑÐ°Ð½Ð´Ð°ÑÑÐ¸Ð·Ð°ÑÐ¸Ñ Ð² Ð¾Ð±Ð»Ð°ÑÑÐ¸ ÑÑÐ´ÐµÐ±Ð½Ð¾-ÑÐºÑÐ¿ÐµÑÑÐ½Ð¾Ð¹ Ð´ÐµÑÑÐµÐ»ÑÐ½Ð¾ÑÑÐ¸; 5. Ð Ð°ÑÑÐ¼Ð¾ÑÑÐµÑÑ Ð¾ÑÐ¾Ð±ÐµÐ½Ð½Ð¾ÑÑÐ¸ ÑÑÐ²ÐµÑÐ¶Ð´ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¸ Ð¿ÑÐ¸Ð¼ÐµÐ½ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ ÑÐ°Ð·Ð»Ð¸ÑÐ½ÑÑ Ð¼ÐµÑÐ¾Ð´Ð¾Ð² Ð¸ Ð¼ÐµÑÐ¾Ð´Ð¸Ðº Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð²ÐµÐ´ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¸Ð·Ð¼ÐµÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ð¹.
description: Topic of the final qualification work: Interpretation of the concept of "measurement error" in the arbitration process. This work is devoted to the study of such a concept as measurement error, in the arbitration process and in general, the meaning of this concept for forensic technical expertise. A wide range of jurisprudence regarding the concept of "error" in forensic examination, as well as interstate GOST standards, regulatory legal acts and international Guidelines for the expression of uncertainty in measurement, relating to such a concept as "measurement error" are considered, studied and analyzed. Studied and analyzed such a concept as "standardization", its role in forensic activities. The purpose of this work is to consider the concept of measurement error in the arbitration process, what impact it has on the decision of the court and how it can be interpreted, as well as to study the role of expertise in the arbitration process, identify current problems in this area and propose ways to solve them. To achieve this goal, the following tasks were solved: 1. Analysis of the concept of "measurement error" in the arbitration process 2. Comparison of the interpretation of the concept of "measurement error" by the court, with its fundamental concept; 3. Comparison of the concepts of "measurement error" with such concepts as "uncertainty" and "error"; 4. Analysis of the concept, standardization in the field of forensic activities; 5. Consider the features of the approval and application of various methods and techniques for conducting measurements.