Assessing the pre-implementation context for financial navigation in rural and non-rural oncology clinics
Creators: name: Planey, Arrianna Marie
name: Biddell, Caitlin B.
name: Petermann, Victoria M.
name: Bell, Ronny A.
name: Cabarrus, Kendrel
name: Deal, Allison M.
name: Reeder-Hayes, Katherine
name: Birken, Sarah A.
name: Samuel-Ryals, Cleo A.
name: Padilla, Neda
name: Gellin, Mindy
name: Manning, Michelle
name: Rosenstein, Donald L.
name: Strom, Carla
name: Vestal, Derek
name: Wheeler, Stephanie B.
name: Leutner, Brian
name: King, Sherry
name: Young, Tiffany H.
name: Spees, Lisa P.
Publisher: name: Frontiers Media SA
Year: 2023

description: BackgroundFinancial navigation (FN) is an evidence-based intervention designed to address financial toxicity for cancer patients. FN's success depends on organizations' readiness to implement and other factors that may hinder or support implementation. Tailored implementation strategies can support practice change but must be matched to the implementation context. We assessed perceptions of readiness and perceived barriers and facilitators to successful implementation among staff at nine cancer care organizations (5 rural, 4 non-rural) recruited to participate in the scale-up of a FN intervention. To understand differences in the pre-implementation context and inform modifications to implementation strategies, we compared findings between rural and non-rural organizations.MethodsWe conducted surveys (n = 78) and in-depth interviews (n = 73) with staff at each organization. We assessed perceptions of readiness using the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) scale. In-depth interviews elicited perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing FN in each context. We used descriptive statistics to analyze ORIC results and deductive thematic analysis, employing a codebook guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), to synthesize themes in barriers and facilitators across sites, and by rurality.ResultsResults from the ORIC scale indicated strong perceptions of organizational readiness across all sites. Staff from rural areas reported greater confidence in their ability to manage the politics of change (87% rural, 76% non-rural) and in their organization's ability to support staff adjusting to the change (96% rural, 75% non-rural). Staff at both rural and non-rural sites highlighted factors reflective of the Intervention Characteristics (relative advantage) and Implementation Climate (compatibility and tension for change) domains as facilitators. Although few barriers to implementation were reported, differences arose between rural and non-rural sites in these perceived barriers, with non-rural staff more often raising concerns about resistance to change and compatibility with existing work processes and rural staff more often raising concerns about competing time demands and limited resources.ConclusionsStaff across both rural and non-rural settings identified few, but different, barriers to implementing a novel FN intervention that they perceived as important and responsive to patients' needs. These findings can inform how strategies are tailored to support FN in diverse oncology practices.