An Archaeological Survey of Four Acres Near Wyatt Drive, Tucson, Pima County, Arizona
Creators: name: Plummer, Shannon D.
Publisher: name: SWCA, Inc. Environmental Consultants
Year: 2002
Subjects: subject: Arizona (State / Territory)
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/335/arizona-state-territory
subject: Tucson Basin
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/2758/tucson-basin
subject: Pima (County)
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/7353/pima-county
subject: Tucson, AZ
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/76651/tucson-az
subject: Prehistoric
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/temporal-keyword/53/prehistoric
subject: Statehood Period
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/temporal-keyword/7606/statehood-period
subject: Euro-American
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/temporal-keyword/5100/euro-american
subject: Hohokam
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/culture-keyword/21/hohokam
subject: Huhugam
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/culture-keyword/8166/huhugam
subject: Historic
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/culture-keyword/25/historic
subject: Euroamerican
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/culture-keyword/28/euroamerican
subject: AZ BB:9:219 (ASM)
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/100479/az-bb9219-asm
subject: Archaeological Feature
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/339/archaeological-feature
subject: Artifact Scatter
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/340/artifact-scatter
subject: Barrel Hoop Fragment
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/2704/barrel-hoop-fragment
subject: Ceramic
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/1/ceramic
subject: Rubber Shoe Sole
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/2705/rubber-shoe-sole
subject: Chipped Stone
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/2/chipped-stone
subject: Glass
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/6/glass
subject: Building Materials
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/8/building-materials
subject: Rhyolite
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/248/rhyolite
subject: Quartzite
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/217/quartzite
subject: Core
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/2121/core
subject: Class III Archaeological Survey
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/other-keyword/159793/class-iii-archaeological-survey
subject: TMC Site Archaeological Survey
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/other-keyword/159813/tmc-site-archaeological-survey
subject: Archaeological Overview
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/1/archaeological-overview
subject: Historic Background Research
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/18/historic-background-research
subject: Reconnaissance / Survey
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/7/reconnaissance-survey
subject: Records Search / Inventory Checking
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/8/records-search-inventory-checking
subject: Systematic Survey
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/12/systematic-survey

description: On May 9, 2002, an archaeologist from SWCA, Inc., Environmental Consultants (SWCA) conducted a pedestrian survey of approximately 4 acres in anticipation of re-zoning the parcel for development. All work was conducted under contract with Planning Resources. One previously recorded site, AZ BB:9:219 (ASM), is partially crossed by the survey area. This site was originally recorded in 1987 as a disturbed prehistoric lithic scatter. The original site boundaries extend to the west and north onto private land, and were not examined in the current survey. The southern site boundary was extended to encompass a historical scatter intermixed with a low density of lithics present within the surveyed area. The historical component of the site appears to be limited to the ground surface. SWCA recommends further archaeological research in the form of testing be conducted within the prehistoric component to assess its significance.