Melanosiagon serraticornis Batelka &amp; Prokop 2021, sp. nov.
Creators: name: Batelka, Jan
name: Prokop, Jakub
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Ripiphoridae
Melanosiagon
Melanosiagon serraticornis

description: <i>Melanosiagonserraticornis</i> sp. nov. <i>Etymology</i>. Tis species epithet refers to the characteristic shape of antennomeres III–X. Tis species name is registered under ZooBank LSID urn:lsid:zoobank. org:act:9D3499A6-664B-4073-A550-32F96AE5C1B7. <i>Material.</i> Holotype: P&amp;rcaron;FUK056 (Figs. 1, 2); lowermost Cenomanian; Myanmar, Kachin, Hukawng Valley; preserved in a polished, transparent yellow piece of amber (14.4 × 10.1 × 0.53 mm). Almost completely preserved female except for four distal pro- and mesotarsomeres and distal half of antennomere XI on the right side (lost during preparation and polishing of the amber). Overall body, especially head capsule and pronotal disc show signs of desiccation of the cuticle and apices of projections on antennomeres VI, VII and XI of the left antenna were broken-off and lost before the body was entrapped in resin. <i>Description</i>. Female. Body dull, black. Head capsule, orthognathous, compressed antero-posteriorly; eyes small, lenticular, prominent in lateral view; vertex transversely planar, slightly elevated above anterior margin of pronotal disc; antennae serrate, inserted in front of eyes; scapus about 2 × as long as pedicel, subcylindrical and slightly curved; pedicel short, about 2 × as long as wide, slightly narrower than scapus; antennomeres III–X distinctly serrate, flattened dorso-ventrally; projections triangular with more or less rounded apices; surface of antennomeres III–XI covered with sparse semi erect sensilla; antennomeres XI similar to preceding ones, albeit not completely preserved;?labrum dorsally covered by erect setae, mandibles sickle-shaped, ventrally directed, with row of erect setae on their outer lateral edge; labial palpi slightly extending beyond the ligula with terminal palpomere fusiform, apices covered by erect setae; ligula in form of two lobes densely covered by bristles; maxillary palpi 4-segmented; palpomere Inot fully discernible, palpomere II longest and widest at apex; palpomere III and IV equal in length; palpomere IV with acute apex; galea distinctly prolonged with surface microstructures probably microtrichia. Pronotum convex, long, widest at base, distinctly narrower towards apex, covered with sparse semi erect setae; posterior margin of pronotum trilobate; median lobe with shallowly convex ridge reaching from base to 2/3 along length of pronotal disc; elevated process at base of median lobe absent; ventral part of prothorax dark and poorly visible. Meso- and metathorax wedge-shaped, only poorly visible ventrally; elytra convex from base to tip, dehiscent, blade-shaped, with sharp apices; surface covered with sparse, backward-leaning semi erect setae; outer borders of elytra nearly straight, inner borders of the last quarter curved outwards. Hind wings dark brown, folded in resting position with asymmetrically overlapping apices, reaching well beyond apices of elytra; apical fields of vein RP with dense longitudinal secondary “ghost” branches. Legs very long and slender; tarsal formula 5-5-4; pretarsal claws straight, with comb of five short teeth and one longer apical curved tooth; prothoracic legs quite different from meso- and metathoracic legs; claws on pretarsus almost as long as protarsomere V, claws on meso- and metatarsomeres much shorter than respective ultimate tarsomere; each leg with two tibial spurs; tibial spurs short on protibia, long on meso- and metatibia; protarsomeres without distinct apical setal fringe, meso- and metatarsomeres with distinct apical setal fringe except on last tarsomere; protibia and protarsomeres covered with fine setae; meso- and metatibia covered with dense fine setae and sparse longer spiniform setae; meso- and metatarsomeres covered dorsally with fine and dense short setae, but ventrally they are covered with sparse and longer spiniform setae. Abdomen short with 5 visible segments (sternites III– VII), much shorter than elytra, laterally compressed; abdominal segments tapering posteriorly, each partially the overlapping succeeding one; sternite VII almost acute at apex. <i>Measurements</i>. Total body length as preserved approx. 430 µm; length of antennae approx. 150 µm. <i>Remarks</i>. <i>Melanosiagonserraticornis</i> gen. et sp. nov. is easily distinguishable from other Ripiphoridae by the following combination of characters: 1) Head compressed antero-posteriorly with vertex transversely planar and not elevated. Tis character is present only in some Macrosiagonini: genus <i>Metoecus</i> Dejean, 1833 and <i>Macrosiagon vittata</i> species group sensu Falin [29]. 2) Tibial spur formula 2-2-2. Complete spur formula is preserved only in basal Ptilophorinae (all genera), in <i>Ivierhipidius</i> [30] (a highly derived genus of uncertain placement [30], in Ripiphorinae in the genus <i>Ripiphorus</i> Bosc, 1791 and <i>Macrosiagon vittata</i> species group, and in most New Zealand Pelecotominae (whereas in most of the genera of this subfamily and in all Hemirhipidiinae there is a strong tendency for fewer tibial spurs on all legs [31, 32]). 3) Antennomeres III–X with distinct triangular projections. Serrate or pectinate antennae are common in females of most Ripiphoridae (with some exceptions at the species level). However, in the <i>Macrosiagon vittata</i> species group (see above paragraphs 1 and 2) antennal projections are thread-like, as in males of the <i>Macrosiagon limbata</i> species group sensu Batelka [33]. 4) Elytra convex, dehiscent and covering the whole abdomen. Complete but dehiscent elytra are typical for most of the Macrosiagonini, but they are usually flattened dorsally. Convex elytra are typical for species in the <i>Macrosiagon limbata</i> and <i>vittata</i> species groups. 5) Apical fields on hind wings with dense longitudinal secondary “ghost” branches. Acharacter occurring only among Ripiphoridae in <i>Macrosiagon</i> (e.g., [27]: Fig. A139, [29]: Figs. 1, 2) including the Eocene species <i>M</i>. <i>deuvei</i> Batelka, Collomb et Nel, 2006 [18]: Figs. 1 –3. 6) Hind wings folded in resting position with asymmetrically overlapping apices extending beyond apices of elytra. Tis character occurs in Ripiphoridae only in <i>Macrosiagon</i>. Numerous examples are available for <i>Macrosiagon</i>, e.g., [34: Figs. 2, 3], [29: Figs. 1, 2], [18: Figs. 1 –3], [33: Figs. 2, 6, 14, 16, 19, 30, 36, 37, 39, 43, 44; [56: Figs. 1, 4, 6, 7] and others. Tis typical manner of hind wing folding is likely to be due to the narrow width of the wings with reduced venation, ‘compensated’ by secondary “ghost” branches in the apical field, and by a short abdomen and variably dehiscent elytra which usually do not completely cover the hind wings. 7) Meso- and metatibia with spiniform setae. Present also in some Ptilophorinae, but legs in this subfamily are much shorter and stronger, and the apices of tibia are much wider. 8) Long and prominent tibial spurs. Character occurring only in Ptilophorinae and Ripiphorinae, in all other subfamilies there is strong tendency for them to be shorter. In Pelecotominae and Hemirhipidiinae they are even partially hidden in the tibial cavity so they are hardly noticeable under low magnification using a binocular microscope (e.g., [31, 32]. 9) Serrate pretarsal claws. Pretarsus with series of distinct teeth are present in Ptilophorinae (their number depends on the size of the specimen (Batelka, pers. obs.)), in <i>Ripiphorus</i>, in which the number and size of teeth is a sexual characteristic [35], and in Pelecotominae of South America (formerly Micholaeminae), in which all teeth are very strong and robust (Batelka, unpublished). As the teeth in all the above-mentioned groups differ in shape and number we consider this character as homoplastic, depending possibly on the surface conditions and locomotive requirements of adults. In Cenozoic Macrosiagonini the pretarsal claws are smooth and distinctly bidentate at apex. Traits of <i>Melanosiagon</i> gen. nov. very convincingly place it among Macrosiagonini (see above under characters 1, 4–6); at least characters 4–6 are undoubtedly shared with <i>Macrosiagon</i>. Unfortunately, the metathorax in <i>Melanosiagon</i> gen. nov. is not discernible so it cannot be compared with Cenozoic Macrosiagonini in which the posterior half of the metepimeron is greatly expanded ventrally above the metacoxa, while the anterior half of the metepimeron evenly tapers towards the mesepimeron. Despite some characters being absent in Cenozoic Macrosiagonini (i.e., serrate pretarsal claws and meso- and metatibia with spiniform setae) we consider <i>Melanosiagon</i> gen. nov. to be a member of the Macrosiagonini. Falin [29] doubts the monophyly of <i>Macrosiagon</i> in respect to <i>M</i>. <i>vittata</i> species group and genus <i>Metoecus</i>. Te phylogenetic analysis of Ripiphoridae based on molecular markers [36] indeed recovered <i>Metoecus</i> nested inside <i>Macrosiagon</i> (members of <i>M</i>. <i>vittata</i> species group were not available for this analysis). More data are needed to reveal which species group(s) of <i>Macrosiagon</i> should eventually be raised to generic status, equal to <i>Melanosiagon</i> gen. nov. and <i>Metoecus</i>. If it is accepted that bidentate pretarsal claws are synapomorphy within Cenozoic Macrosiagonini, it seems unlikely that genera in this lineage are descendants of <i>Melanosiagon</i> gen. nov.
description: Published as part of <i>Batelka, Jan &amp; Prokop, Jakub, 2021, The earliest beetle with mouthparts specialized for feeding on nectar is a parasitoid of mid-Cretaceous Hymenoptera, pp. 1-12 in BMC Ecology and Evolution (207) (207) 21 (1)</i> on pages 3-6, DOI: 10.1186/s12862-021-01930-6, http://zenodo.org/record/5733385
description: {"references": ["29. Falin ZH. Revision of three New World Macrosiagon Hentz species (Coleoptera: Ripiphoridae: Ripiphorinae) with a discussion of phylogenetic relationships within the Macrosiagonini. Coleopterists Bull. 2004; 58: 1 - 19.", "30. Barclay MVL. Ivierhipidius, an enigmatic new Neotropical genus of Ripiphoridae (Coleoptera: Tenebrionoidea) with four new species. Acta Entomol Mus Nat Pragae. 2015; 55: 691 - 701.", "31. Batelka J. Clinopalpus hanae, a new genus and species of ripiphorid beetle from Malaysia (Coleoptera: Ripiphoridae: Pelecotominae). Acta Entomol Mus Nat Pragae. 2009; 49: 239 - 45.", "32. Engel MS, Falin ZH, Batelka J. A new genus of Pelecotominae from Mexico, with notes on the genera Clinops and Scotoscopus and the description of new species (Coleoptera, Ripiphoridae). ZooKeys. 2019; 857: 59 - 84.", "33. Batelka J. Contribution to the synonymies, distributions, and bionomics of the Old World species of Macrosiagon (Coleoptera: Ripiphoridae). Acta Entomol Mus Nat Pragae. 2011; 51: 587 - 626.", "27. Fedorenko DN. Evolution of the beetle hind wing, with special reference to folding (Insecta, Coleoptera). Golovatch SI. editor. Pensoft, Sofia-Moscow; 2009. 1 - 336.", "18. Batelka J, Collomb FM, Nel A. Macrosiagon deuvei n. sp. (Coleoptera: Ripiphoridae) from the French Eocene amber. Ann Soc Entomol Fr. 2006; 42: 75 - 8.", "35. Batelka J. Ripiphoridae (Coleoptera) of Greece and Turkey with notes on their distribution in the Eastern Mediterranean and some neighboring countries. Acta Mus Morav Sci Biol. 2007; 92: 155 - 75.", "36. Batelka J, Kundrata R, Bocak L. Position and relationships of Ripiphoridae (Coleoptera: Tenebrionoidea) inferred from the ribosomal and mitochondrial molecular markers. Annal Zool. 2016; 66: 113 - 23. https: // doi. org / 10. 3161 / 00034541 ANZ 2016.66.1.008."]}