Stigmella torminalis Beirne 1945
Creators: name: van Nieukerken, Erik J.
name: Robrecht, Dieter
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2025
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Lepidoptera
Nepticulidae
Stigmella
Stigmella torminalis

description: Stigmella torminalis (Wood, 1890)
Figs 1–2, 3–5, 11–14, 15–17, 18–25, 26, 27, 30
Nepticula torminalis Wood, 1890. Lectotype ♂ (selected by Schoorl et al. (1985: 72). United Kingdom, England: “ e. l. Sorbus torminalis, Tarrington, Dr Wood 10.7. [18] 90, B. M. ♂ Genitalia slide 21870, NHMUK 010920613. NHMUK. [Photos of moth and labels https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/3332473337]
Stigmella torminalis (Wood, 1890) Beirne, 1945. New combination.
Stigmella torminalis; important citations: Beirne 1945: 200; Emmet 1976: 257; Schoorl et al. 1985: 72; Johansson and Nielsen 1990: 173; Puplesis and Schoorl 1994: 36; Navickaitė et al. 2014: 157; Robrecht et al. 2024: 112.
Recognition.
Adult (Figs 1 – 5). Forewing length ♂ 1.9–2.0 mm (n = 3), ♀ 1.9–2.1 mm (n = 3), wingspan ♂ 4.5–4.8 mm (n = 8), ♀ 4.0–4.8 (n = 8); antennae ♂ with 23–28 articles (n = 8), ♀ with 20–22 (n = 5). The combination of a black hair tuft and collar on the head and forewings with a broad brassy fascia that does not contrast strongly with the golden-brown wing base, are characteristic. However, some specimens from Hungary have an orange head tuft. Male without androconial scales, abdomen without anal tufts. Stigmella regiella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1855) has a very similar wing pattern, but an orange head tuft and in the male purple black androconial scales in the fringe; S. mespilicola, that also feeds on the same host, has also a black head and collar, but a more contrasting and narrower silver to golden fascia, and conspicuous black androconial scales in the male.
Male genitalia (Figs 11–14). Characterised by the very long phallus, and the valva with two distal points. They resemble those of the eastern European and Asian S. aurora Puplesis, 1984 which feeds on Crataegus and Mespilus (Puplesis and Schoorl 1994), and the Turkmenian S. lanceolata Puplesis, 1994 (hostplant unknown), but differ strongly from other European species. Stigmella aurora differs by the narrower pointed triangular process on valva and the somewhat shorter phallus (2 measurements: 280–300 µm) (Stonis and Rocienė 2013); judging from the original drawings (Puplesis 1994), S. lanceolata is almost inseparable from S. aurora. Measurements (n = 4): capsule length 170–205 µm, width 165–200 µm, valva length 145–155 µm, phallus length 350–415 µm. Ratio phallus: capsule length 1.9–2.3.
Female genitalia (Figs 15–17). A very long but thin corpus bursae and round, conspicuous and wrinkled accessory sac are characteristic. The related species S. hahniella and S. regiella have an elongate accessory sac. Very different from S. mespilicola that has a strongly coiled accessory sac (Fig. 46).
Leafmines (Figs 18–25, 30). Egg always on leaf underside on or close to a main vein (Fig. 25). Mine starts as rather straight gallery, often following a vein for a short stretch, with a narrow continuous black frass line in middle; gradually widening in final instar, mine continuously changing direction; frass getting somewhat wider, slightly zigzagging, but remaining continuous and not more than 1 / 3 mine width. In dried mines the frass often becomes broken in places.
Larva: in mine almost transparent, yellow outside, paired prothoracic sclerite dark brown to black, often hiding head capsule, paired brains brown and well visible, larva with dorsum upwards.
Cocoon: pale orange-brown (T. Muus, personal information).
Distribution (Fig. 27).
So far known from one locality in England (type locality, where apparently extinct), Germany: few records in Rheinland-Pfalz, Hessen and probably Thüringen, Belgium (Namur), Hungary (Budapest region), North Macedonia, the Crimea and possibly Georgia (Adjara). See below for detailed discussion.
Hostplant.
Stigmella torminalis has only been found on Torminalis glaberrima (Rosaceae). Records on other hosts must be regarded as erroneous, or refer to misidentified S. mespilicola.
Life history.
Larvae were found in late June and July in England, Germany and Hungary, between 17 July and 4 August in the Crimea. Vacated leafmines can still be found later. Univoltine, all adults emerged (in captivity) after hibernation the next spring, in May and June. There are no records of adults caught in nature.
DNA barcoding (Fig. 53).
We obtained three DNA barcodes from the Hessen material: one larva and two adults, and one from a larva from Belgium. All share the barcode, with the Barcode Identification Number (BIN) BOLD: AEO 3975, the German specimens have an identical barcode, the Belgium specimen has a distance of 0.33 %. The nearest neighbour is Stigmella aurora, BIN BOLD: AEY 8102, a population from Mespilus germanica L. in Russia, Dagestan, at a distance of 3.5 %.
Material examined.
Adults. – GERMANY • 2 ♂, 3 ♀ (Figs 1 – 4); Hessen, Volkmarschen-Hörle, NSG Iberg; 51.44411°N, 9.0887°E; alt. 290 m; 03 Jul. 2021; D. Robrecht leg.; Host: Torminalis glaberrima; emerged 01–02 May 2022; Genitalia slides: EvN 5447 ♂ (Fig. 12), EvN 5448 ♀ (Fig. 17); RMNH.INS.25447, RMNH.INS.25448, RMNH.INS.1557369, RMNH.INS.1557289, RMNH.INS.1557370; RMNH. • 1 ♂ 2 unsexed; Same collecting data as for preceding, emerged 03 May. 2022; Genitalia slide: Robrecht J 26 (Fig. 11); coll. W. Wittland. • 10 ♂, 6 ♀, 2 unsexed; unlabelled, almost certainly Eppelsheim material; [Rheinland-Pfalz, Grünstadt]; [49.5667°N, 8.1681°E]; [no date, 19 th century]; [Eppelsheim leg.]; Genitalia slides: VU 0328 (Fig. 13), VU 0333, VU 0334 (Fig. 14), VU 0349, VU 0357, VU 1480 (Figs 15, 16), VU 2366, VU 2367; RMNH.INS.20328, RMNH.INS.20333, RMNH.INS.20334, RMNH.INS.20349, RMNH.INS.20357, RMNH.INS.21480, RMNH.INS.22366, RMNH.INS.22367, RMNH.INS.1556801 – RMNH.INS.1556809, RMNH.
Leafmines and larvae. (Host always Torminalis glaberrima, collection RMNH). – BELGIUM • 1 dead larva, 2 mines; Namur, Rochefort, Lavaux-Sainte-Anne, Le Gros Tienne; 50.1064°N, 5.1003°E; alt. 225 m; 06 Sep. 2014; S. Wullaert leg.; EventId: Wullaert 276, 281; RMNH.INS.31737 (larva) (Fig. 23), RMNH.INS.39245. – GEORGIA • 3 vacated mines; Adjara AR, Chikuneti; 41.57028°N, 41.86278°E; alt. 880 m; 26 Sep. 2018; M. V. Kozlov & V. Zverev leg.; EventId: Kozlov-Georgia- 2018–61; RMNH.INS.48100, RMNH.INS.48101. – GERMANY • 1 larva, 1 mine; Hessen, Volkmarsen-Hörle, NSG Iberg; 51.44411°N, 9.0887°E; alt. 290 m; 03 Jul. 2021; D. Robrecht leg.; slide: RMNH.INS.31632. P; RMNH.INS.31632 (barcoded larva), RMNH.INS.39228 (leafmine). • 22 mines, 13 larvae reared (Figs 18–22); same locality data as previous, 3 + 10 Jul. 2021, D. Robrecht leg.; collection D. Robrecht. – NORTH MACEDONIA • 1 vacated mine (Figs 24, 25); Ohrid, Galičica NP, N Part, NE of Velestovo, trail; 41.09655°N, 20.84073°E; alt. 1215 m; 04 Aug. 2021; E. J. van Nieukerken leg.; EventId: EvN no 2021098 - H; RMNH.INS.48654.
Photographs examined. (Host always Torminalis glaberrima).
Adults. – HUNGARY • 1 ♀, 1 unsexed; Budapest, Hármashatárhegy; [47.556°N, 19°E]; [alt. 460–490 m]; 22 Jul. 1964; J. Szőcs leg.; emerged 19 Apr. & 04 Mar. 1965; EventId: Zucht: 36 / 64; HNHM. • 2 ♀ (Fig. 5); Budapest, Normafa; [47.504°N, 18.965°E]; J. Szőcs leg.; emerged 6 & 12 Apr. 1959; Genitalia slide: Tokár No. 9388; HNHM.
Leafmines and larvae. – BELGIUM • 3 mines; Namur, Rochefort, Le Gros Tienne; 50.106°N, 5.098°E; 02 Aug. 2020; Regis Nossent leg., Maarten Vangansbeke leg; https://waarnemingen.be/observation/197785811/, https://waarnemingen.be/observation/197890785/. • 1 mine; same locality data; 04 Jul. 2023; Daan Dekeukeleire leg.; https://waarnemingen.be/observation/279601319/. • 1 mine; same locality data; 30 Jun. 2024; cocoon on 6 Jul.; T. Muus leg. et coll. – GERMANY • 5 larvae; Hessen, KB Volkmarsen – NSG Iberg bei Hörle; 51.446°N, 9.089°E; 26 Jun. & 07 Jul. 2022; Hubertus Trilling leg.; https://observation.org/observation/246938772/, https://observation.org/observation/248264022/. • 1 mine; Rheinland-Pfalz, BIT Hüttingen an der Kyll; 49.96084°N, 6.59469°E; 26 Aug. 2023; Alexander Franzen leg.; https://observation.org/observation/285967244/. • 1 larva; Rheinland-Pfalz, COC Klotten Dortebachtal; 50.17072°N, 7.21337°E; 23 Jul. 2022; Rijmenans Gilbert leg.; https://observation.org/observation/250303797/. • 1 mines; Rheinland-Pfalz, WIL Erden; 49.98456°N, 7.02022°E; 27 Aug. 2023; Justus Vogel leg.; https://observation.org/observation/288321758/. – HUNGARY • 2 mines on 1 leaf [Herbarium sheet] (Fig. 30); Budapest, Hármashatárhegy; [47.556°N, 19°E]; alt. 460–490 m; 27 Jul. 1963; J. Szőcs leg.; Torminalis glaberrima; HNHM. • 11 mines on 7 leaves [Herbarium sheet]; same locality data; 22 Jul. 1964; J. Szőcs leg.; Torminalis glaberrima; EventId: Zucht: 36 / 64; HNHM.
The British type locality.
John H. Wood (1841–1914) submitted his description of Nepticula torminalis on July 10 th, 1890 (Wood 1890) (published in August), and as he described the moths and mines, he must have found the mines with larvae in 1889 or before. The lectotype, originating from the Stainton collection, carries a label in Stainton’s handwriting with the same date, suggesting that the moth emerged on 10 July. This seems unlikely as Wood clearly stated that the species is univoltine, with mines occurring in July, while Tutt (1899) wrote that moths emerged in May-June. Three other specimens in the NHMUK collection, original from the Walsingham collection and with the handwriting of Durrant (numbers BMNH (E) 1925640–1925642), carry a written date that could be read as “ 10. xi. 1890 ”. We think that these dates are wrong transcriptions from Wood’s original data, most likely of 10. vi. 1890. These labels also mysteriously cite the locality as “ Tarrington, BEDFORD, E. ” whereas it should be Tarrington, Hereford (the county of Bedfordshire is ca 100 km to the east).
Wood’s collection ended up in the NHMUK (Edwards 1926; Chandler 2014), and at least the Diptera in it were mounted by three on discs of card, with labelling on the underside of the disc (Chandler 2014). There are at least 12 other specimens of Stigmella torminalis in NHMUK from his collection, but all without dates (Schoorl et al. 1985). Wood found the larvae in July (presumably thus in 1889) in a wood near his home in Tarrington (Herefordshire, coordinates of the village 52.063, -2.559), as he wrote: “ Although its foodplant grows here more or less plentifully in all the woods, I can only find the insect in one small corner of one of them. In this very limited spot it is fairly common, nearly every bush having a few tenanted leaves, with occasionally two or even three mines in a leaf ”.
Later he specified the locality as Stoke Wood (Wood 1908), written by Roper (1993) as Stoke Edith Wood. The old Ordnance Survey maps (https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/side-by-side/#zoom=14.9&lat=52.05488&lon=-2.57673&layers=6&right= OSAPI) do not cite this exact name, but “ Stoke Edith Park ”, which seems less likely to be the exact locality, being a more open parkland, whereas a bit south is a large woodland, named either “ the Plantation ” or “ Dormington Wood ” on most maps. This is a little over 1 km southwest of Tarrington. According to Roper (1993) this area, the Malvern and Suckley Hills, is one of the strongholds of the Wild Service tree in Britain, where the tree reaches one of its highest densities. Other records in local publications of S. torminalis in our opinion all point back to the original record (Hutchinson 1892; Wood 1894, 1908).
Wood apparently reared a considerable number of adults and distributed them freely amongst several collectors. The species was described and mentioned in all major British handbooks (Meyrick 1895; Tutt 1899; Meyrick 1928; Emmet 1976), and the male genitalia were illustrated by Beirne (1945), and male and female genitalia together with a full redescription later in the revision of the Stigmella oxyacanthella group (Schoorl et al. 1985), but it was never recorded again and Davis (2012) considered it to be extinct.
There have been a few later British records of leafmines, but they are probably completely wrong, such as Trebilcock (1965: 123), who cites it from Cornwall, noting that the larva was raised from cultivated cherry near Bodmin, which is an incorrect hostplant. Emmet (1973) suggested that the leafmine on Torminalis that Bradford (1973) exhibited might be that species, but he probably later reconsidered that as he wrote: We must try to rediscover torminalis. It was recorded only by Wood, who stated that it was “ confined to a small corner of one wood ” at Tarrington in Herefordshire (Emmet 1974). The mines that were recorded later from this host all belong to Stigmella mespilicola (Emmet 1988; Agassiz 1992; Edmunds 2024).
The old German localities.
The first record of Stigmella torminalis in Germany that we could trace was in the handbook by Hering (1932: 7), who recorded Nepticula torminalis from “ Westdeutschland, selten ”. It is possible that Hering actually had seen moths from the Staudinger collection, as he was based in Berlin, but we have no proof that his record was correct, but see below. Real proof that S. torminalis occurred in West Germany, only came with the revision by Schoorl et al. (1985), who cited specimens from respectively “ Donnersberg ” and “ Rheinland-Pfalz ”, Staudinger (NHMUK), Pfalz, leg. Eppelsheim (MHUB) and unlabelled ones from the Amsterdam and Leiden collections (ZMAN and RMNH, now all in RMNH, see material examined). All these specimens and several others seen later in other European museums looked similar with respect to pins and pith, and sometimes carried labels, often not, and were often placed under various other species. The material from the Bentinck collection in RMNH e. g., was partly misidentified as S. lonicerarum (Frey, 1857), partly as S. aceris (Frey, 1857). This suggested that they were once obtained from the insect selling company Staudinger and Bang Haas, maybe partly without species name, and probably all go back to the same reared series. An early indication of this is the first illustration of the male genitalia, misidentified as Nepticula mespilicola by Petersen (1930: fig. 55, page 59), originating from Pfalz. He also quotes Hering: “ according to M. Hering is mespilicola = torminalis ”. Petersen used the Berlin collection with Staudinger material as source for the genitalia dissections. Another indication is the more detailed illustration of the male and female genitalia by Puplesis in Ivinskis et al. (1985: 217) under S. mespilicola, specimens in the collection of the Zoological Institute in St. Petersburg, that also came from Rheinpfalz, [18] 97, Staudinger (Johansson and Nielsen 1990).
Donnersberg (49.62, 7.91) is a forested mountain ca 20 km west of Grünstadt (49.56, 8.17) in Pfalz. Friedrich Eppelsheim (1834–1900) lived in Grünstadt and collected especially Microlepidoptera in that region, but rarely published about those (E. Hering 1900). Disqué (1902: 226) wrote about him:
„ Vorstehender Gattung [= Nepticula] habe ich bis jetzt noch wenig Aufmerksamkeit geschenkt: doch besitze ich fast alle in der Pfalz vorkommenden Arten durch die Güte des verstorbenen Herrn Oberamtsrichters Eppelsheim in Grünstadt, der sich in den letzten Jahren seines Lebens fast ausschliesslich der Zucht dieser Kleinsten der Kleinen widmete. Zweifellos kommt die grössere Zahl der in der Pfalz vorkommenden Arten auch in hiesiger Gegend vor. [So far I have paid little attention to this genus [= Nepticula], but I have almost all the species occurring in the Palatinate through the kindness of the late Chief magistrate Eppelsheim in Grünstadt, who devoted the last years of his life almost exclusively to the breeding of these smallest of the small. There is no doubt that the majority of the species found in the Palatinate also occur in this region] ”
The records of S. torminalis are probably hidden under those of Nepticula mespilicola in the second list of Pfalz Microlepidoptera (Disqué 1907: 95) as “ Mespilicola Frey. R. Amelanchier. Sorbus. ” Griebel (1911: 103) reported in more detail about this species: “ Bei Grünstadt, Eisenberg und am Donnersberg. Die Raupe an Amelanchier vulgaris, Sorbus aria und torminalis. ” “ [Near Grünstadt, Eisenberg and on the Donnersberg. The caterpillar on Amelanchier vulgaris, Sorbus aria and torminalis.] ”. Together with the cited specimens one may conclude that Eppelsheim collected this species at least in Grünstadt and Donnersberg on Torminalis, and also collected S. mespilicola on the three hosts. As in England, the species must have been common in this area at the end of the 19 th century.
The new German records.
The second author found 13 larvae on Torminalis glaberrima in Hessen, Volkmarsen-Hörle, NSG Iberg, elevation 280 m, on July 3 rd, 2021, some mines were already vacated. On July 10 th, 2021 one larva and six vacated mines could be found. One larva was found on June 26 th, 2022 and four larvae on July 7 th 2022. The identification was confirmed by the senior author by DNA barcoding of a larva, and later by the emerging adults. After spreading the word to some local collectors by DR, a few more records of mines were made in Rheinland-Pfalz in 2022 and 2023 (all checked by DR, listed by Robrecht et al. 2024), and we spotted one record from Klotten on Observation. org, then misidentified as Stigmella magdalenae (Klimesch, 1950) (https://observation.org/observation/250303797/).
The NSG Iberg is a limestone slope exposed to the west. In the forest area grow mainly beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), Scottish pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), larch (Larix decidua Mill.), sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus L.), hawthorn (Crataegus Tourn. ex L.) and sloe (Prunus spinosa L.) trees. There are about 20 adolescent Torminalis glaberrima trees which are heavily shaded (Fig. 26).
Other new records.
We record the species here new for North Macedonia (Galičica National Park, N. part) on the basis of a single vacated leafmine (Figs 24, 25) and from Belgium (Namur: Rochefort), based on leafmines with dead larvae, one of which was barcoded (Fig. 23), and additional observations from the same localities on the observation site https://waarnemingen.be/ and one larva in 2024 (T. Muus leg.). Three leafmines from Georgia (Adjara) are tentatively also regarded as S. torminalis, although they were collected late September, it is possible that larvae occur slightly later in the Caucasus and that the vacated mines lasted several weeks after larval occurrence.
Discussion of literature records.
Germany. The oldest record maybe that by Martini (1917: 179), who recorded Nepticula mespilicola from Sachsenburg (Thüringen, 51.29, 11.16), from caterpillars on Sorbus torminalis in July, and reared moths in the following April. This would indicate a univoltine species, and is thus more likely S. torminalis than S. mespilicola.
After M. Hering’s (1932) first record of the adult, that was repeated by Eckstein (1933: 199) in his handbook for Microlepidoptera, Hering described also the leafmines and compared them with those of S. mespilicola in his first leafmine key work (M. Hering 1937), then still under a large genus Pyrus L., then including Malus Mill. and Sorbus L. This key has probably been a major source for the later confusion with S. mespilicola, as he separated the mines only by the width of the frass line (page 377). He also listed both “ P. aria ” and “ P. torminalis ” as hosts. In his later keys for Europe (M. Hering 1957), he maintained that key character, and even included Sorbus aucuparia (page 1012) and Amelanchier Medik. (page 77) as hosts. He did, however, mention only the month July for the occurrence of the mines, whereas he recorded those of S. mespilicola (as S. ariella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1860)) from July, September and October.
Many of the subsequent records can easily be dismissed on the basis of their occurrence in the autumn, on the wrong hosts or because adults were reared in summer. As none of the other published German records have been provided with more detail or illustrations of either the adult, genitalia or leafmine, we consider them all as incorrect or at least unverified, until proof can be obtained from collection material.
The next record was from Württemberg by Wörz (1937: 290), when he described the new species Nepticula hahniella. He also gave a key with some more characters, such as the egg position, and larval colour, but both are confusing as the egg position is variable in S. mespilicola and the larva of that species is not green, but yellow. The senior author examined the leafmines (Figs 28, 29) and adults in Wörz’s collection in Stuttgart, and concluded that all mines and adults identified as S. torminalis are misidentified S. mespilicola (the adults had earlier also been re-identified by A. Laštůvka). The incorrect Württemberg records were repeated several times (Skala 1939; Wörz 1958).
Ludwig (1952: 33) recorded S. torminalis from Nordrhein-Westfalen, Siegen from leafmines on Sorbus aucuparia, which must be regarded as certainly wrong. Such mines most likely belong to S. magdalenae (Klimesch, 1950).
In Bavaria (Bayern) the species was recorded from leafmines on Torminalis by Huber (1969: 98) from two localities in Schwaben. As no details are given, this cannot be proven. This record was repeated in some checklists (Pröse 1987; Pröse and Segerer 1999), but finally deleted from the fauna (Haslberger and Segerer 2016).
Steuer (1984: 97) reported mines from Thüringen, Bad Blankenburg, in September both on Torminalis and Aria edulis (Willd.) M. Roem. A reared female was examined by EvN and belongs to S. mespilicola. The record was later corrected (Steuer 1991). However, as shown above, the species probably does or did occur in Thüringen.
The latest published record, also from Hessen (Hannover 2019: 39) was a vacated leafmine on Sorbus aucuparia, and also from September, thus certainly incorrect. Such mines could belong either to S. magdalenae or S. nylandriella (Tengström, 1848).
The record by Biesenbaum (2006: 49) from the Eifel was not a misidentification, but a corruption for S. tormentillella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1860), see Biesenbaum (2007) [where the incorrect spelling S. “ tormetillella ” was used]. This was repeated by Gaedike (2008: 13) and corrected later (Gaedike 2009).
Switzerland. Weber (1945: 401) recorded S. torminalis from Altberg near Weiningen, mines with larvae in August and October both on Aria edulis and Torminalis. The timing already makes this S. mespilicola and a photo of the reared specimen in the ETZ collection (courtesy Andreas Kopp, see under material of mespilicola) confirms that. The inclusion in the Swiss checklist is therefore incorrect (SwissLepTeam 2010) and it was recently deleted (Bryner and Kopp 2023).
Austria. Klimesch and Skala (1936: 95) recorded leaf mines from Maria Winkling, already including some doubts, and this was later corrected to S. mespilicola (see Klimesch 1990: 33), but still with a note that the identification was not certain. Skala (1937: 10) recorded one mine from Wien-Schönbrunn on 30 September 1935 and later (Skala 1944 b: 393) on 11 September on Aria edulis. Both clearly belong to S. mespilicola, which also was suggested by Skala in his last paper. He then also noted: “ Die Mine der torminalis Wood scheint unbekannt zu sein ”. Also Zimmermann (1944) recorded it from the Vienna region: Schönbrunn and Wien-Bèlvedere, mines on Torminalis and? Aria. Huemer and Tarmann (1993) did not accept these records and deleted the species from the Austrian list.
Czechia. Skala (1944 a: 115) reported “ Nepticula torminalis Wood im Sinne Herings ” from Eisgrub (= Lednice) in October and Tischnowitz (= Tišnov) in August. He added that he considered it as a form of S. mespilicola and that is most likely the correct identification of these records. Zimmermann (1944) repeated the Eisgrub record. Laštůvka et al. (1993) excluded these records and thus the species from the Moravian and the Czech fauna.
Hungary. The species was repeatedly recorded from Hungary, from Nadap, Budakeszi, several localities near Budapest (Szőcs 1956, 1965, 1977 a, 1981 b), the Mecsek mountains (Balogh 1978) and Badacsony, Uzsa (Szabóky 1982). Probably many of these records are incorrect, several have the wrong timing or hostplant. Already in 1981, EvN studied a borrowed pair of moths of S. torminalis from the Szőcs collection (from Budapest, Normafa, see below), which turned out to be S. mespilicola (genitalia slides VU 1755 and VU 1756). These were collected in June as larva and emerged already in July. On this basis EvN considered at the time all records of S. torminalis in Hungary as incorrect or unproven. In the draft of the European list (van Nieukerken 1996) he did not enter Hungary in the country list, but this was added later by a country recorder without EvN’s knowledge. Also Fazekas (2007: 17) concluded that Balogh’s record was unconfirmed on the advice of EvN. Finally Pastoralis (2010) removed the species from the Hungarian list, based on advise of Zdenko Tokár who had the opportunity to check one specimen.
However, the situation is clearly more complicated, as Szőcs (1981 b) collected larvae only in June and July, and reared adults from some of those in the early months of the next year. This would point to the univoltine Stigmella torminalis. As Z. Tokár (pers. comm.) had identified the above cited specimen as S. regiella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1855) (based on externals), not the more obvious alternative S. mespilicola, we wondered if this could be a S. torminalis with red head rather than brown or black, as otherwise the externals of S. regiella and S. torminalis are very similar. On EvN’s request, Z. Bálint (Budapest) sent a couple of photos of adults and leafmines. He also arranged photograps of the genitalia prepared by Tokár after remounting it on slide. After carefully studying the photos of the leafmines (e. g. Fig. 30) and the adults (Fig. 5), we conclude that a few specimens that were reared in spring from larvae collected in the previous June or July belong to S. torminalis, even though some specimens have an orange head, whereas the majority of leafmines and adults belong to S. mespilicola. The mines from the sample with orange heads (Hármashatárhegy, 22. vii. 1964, Zucht 36 / 74, see Fig. 30) clearly show the characters of S. torminalis, not S. regiella, and one adult from that sample has a dark head. Finally the photo of the genitalia showed a round accessory sac, typical for S. torminalis. The S. torminalis specimens were from two localities, Budapest, Hármashatárhegy and Budapest, Normafa.
Italy. There are two potentially wrong records: Klimesch (1940: 189) recorded it from Trieste on the basis of two vacated mines on Torminalis in October and later he found a single mine in Sopra Sasso in late September (Klimesch 1951: 58). The dates speak for identification as S. mespilicola and it was therefore not included in the Italian checklist (Karsholt et al. 1995).
Slovenia. Jože Maček recorded S. torminalis three times (Maček 1970, 1979, 1993), summarised again by Maček (1999). Two records are wrong on the basis of the hostplants Amelanchier ovalis Medik. and Aria edulis, the one recorded from Torminalis was found in September, the wrong period for the mines (although it might be possible to find old mines). All these should be regarded most likely as S. mespilicola. Maček based his identifications and taxonomy largely on Hering, inclusion of S. torminalis in the Slovenian checklists is therefore incorrect (Lesar and Habeler 2005; Lesar and Govedic 2010).
Serbia. Jakšić (2016) listed S. torminalis on the basis of four papers by Nenad Dimić. Three of these papers were examined by us (Dimić 1994; Dimić et al. 1999, 2000) and show no detail about collection dates or hostplants and are based on leafmines alone, identified with Hering’s keys. Also the used nomenclature is completely out of date, providing little trust that these records are reliable. For now S. torminalis should be deleted from the Serbian fauna.
Romania. Drăghia (1976: 180) reported it from Torminalis in the northern Dobrogea area in 1973 and 1974, without further details. Although it is possible that some of these were correct, considering the occurrence of Stigmella torminalis on the Crimea, without voucher material the record cannot be accepted. It was also entered in the checklist by Popescu-Gorj (1984), but Rákosy et al. (2003) stated that the record requires confirmation.
Ukraine, Crimea. Navickaitė et al. (2014) recorded S. torminalis as new from the Crimea, as very common in a few localities, from adults reared from larvae that were collected in July-August 2011. This record is amply annotated with photos of larvae, leafmines and genitalia, and definitely correct.
description: Published as part of van Nieukerken, Erik J. & Robrecht, Dieter, 2025, Stigmella species on the Wild Service Tree, Torminalis glaberrima, confused, overlooked and found again (Lepidoptera, Nepticulidae), pp. 29-67 in Nota Lepidopterologica 48 on pages 29-67, DOI: 10.3897/nl.48.141094