Dendrapta nasicola Marcial Irrigoitia &amp; Taglioretti &amp; T. Timi 2020, n. sp.
Creators: name: Irrigoitia, Manuel M.
name: Taglioretti, Verónica
name: Timi, Juan T.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2020
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Maxillopoda
Siphonostomatoida
Lernaeopodidae
Dendrapta
Dendrapta nasicola

description: <i>Dendrapta nasicola n. sp.</i> Adult female [based on 15 ovigerous specimens, including holotype, 10 paratypes and four additional specimens used for dissection and SEM]. Total body length (excluding posterior processes) 11.1±1 (9.7–12.8, 15). Cephalothorax heart-shaped, 2.9±0.4 (2.3–3.7, 15) long, 3.2±0.3 (2.9–3.8, 15) maximum width, slightly tilted ventrally tolong axis of trunk (Figs. 1a, b; 2a, b), its posterior part fully occupied by maxillary basis (Figs. 2b; 3a), dorsal shield indistinct. Buccal cone situated anteriorly on ventral surface of cephalothorax (Figs. 2b; 3b). Trunk 8.3±1.1 (6.1– 9.6, 15) long, 5.8±0.5 (5.2–6.8, 15) maximum width, with short anteriorpart (neck), 1.6±0.2 (1.4–2.0, 12) long part separated by shallow constriction from roughly pyriform posterior part, 6.7±0.9 (4.7–7.7, 15) long (Figs. 1a, b; 2a). Abdomen small, rather dorsal. Paired posterior processes situated on both sides of abdomen, club-shaped, 6.7±1.0 (5.3–8.9, 27) long, representing 81.0% (62.2–102.4) of trunk length, dorsal to multiseriate egg sacs, 8.5±1.6 (4.9–10.7, 20) long, 2.4±0.3 (1.8–2.8, 20) wide (Figs. 1a, b; 2a, c). N: number of examined fish; P: prevalence; MA: mean abundance. Sternés exact 95% confidence limits are given between parentheses after P and MA values. Antennule (Fig. 1c) three-segmented, first segment carrying short dorso-median whip; second segment short, carrying small distal solus, terminal segment with rounded tip, bearing three subterminal tubercles (processes 1-3), digitiform aesthete (4), and two short setae (5 and 6) (armature formula -base to apex- as follows: 1, 1, 5 + 1 aesthete). Antenna (Figs. 1e; 3b, c, e) biramous, basis with a distoventral patch of spinules, rami subequally long; exopod 1-segmented with spinulose lateral and distal margins, bearing two short setae (one lateral and one medial) near distal end; endopod two-segmented, first segment with ventral patch of spinules, distal segment armed with robust curved hook 1, slender seta 2, and process 5 located on spinulose process 4 on distoventral margin; process 3 absent. Mouth cone small, labrum and labium fringed by setules (Figs. 3b, c, d); mandible (Fig. 1d) represented by narrow blade with three secondary teeth; dental formula: P1, S1, P1, S1, P1, S1, B5. Maxillule (Figs. 1f; 3f) bilobate, exopod cylindrical ending in two subequal setae; endopod longer, with three terminal papillae and proximal patch of spinules. Maxilla (Figs. 1a; 2a; 3g) developed as a profusely branched holdfast characteristic of the genus, basal part robust (Figs. 2b, c), 4.1±0.9 (2.2–5.4, 26) long, 1.5±0.3 (0.7–2.1, 26), narrowing abruptly before branching in a fragile brush of rhizoid branches holdfast. Vestigial bulla present (Fig. 3h). Maxilliped (Figs. 1g, 3a) twosegmented. Corpus robust, myxal area with one seta on inflated base. Subchela with basal seta. Claw blunt, slightly curved, barb stout, of similar length than claw. Adult male not found. <b>Taxonomic summary</b> Type-host: <i>Bathyraja scaphiops</i> (Norman, 1937) (Rajiformes: Arhynchobatidae). Type-locality: Deep waters off Buenos Aires province, Argentina (35° - 41°S). Site: Olfactory sacs. Type-specimens: Holotype MLP-Cr coll. No. MLP-Cr 27314 (female). Paratypes MLP-Cr coll. No. MLP-Cr 27315 (10 females). Etymology: The specific name refers to the microhabitat of the parasite, the olfactory sacs in nasal cavities of its hosts. ZooBank registration: This work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN). The Life Science Identifier (LSID) for <i>Dendrapta nasicola</i> n. sp. is: urn:lsid:zoobank. org:act:E3E43B22-6237-4CB8-8E3C-30957C951ECB. <b>Remarks</b> At present, <i>D. cameroni,</i> the only species in the genus, is represented by two subspecies, <i>D. c. cameroni</i> and <i>D. c. longiclavata</i> (Dippenaar et al. 2004, Walter &amp; Boxshall 2018). They differ in the proportions of the trunk, in the length of the posterior processes and the mode of branching of the attachment organ (Kabata &amp; Gusev 1966). Indeed, based on averaged measurements, the trunk of <i>D. c. cameroni</i> is much wider than long, whereas that of <i>D. c. longiclavata</i> is only slightly wider than long; the posterior processes of the former are about half length of the trunk, but more than twice as long as the trunk in the later; additionally, the attachment organ of <i>D. c. longiclavata</i> is much more profuse and more finely divided than in <i>C. c. cameroni</i> (Kabata &amp; Gusev 1966, Kabata 1988). Despite these differences, normally used as diagnostic specific characters in other species of lernaeopodids (Boxshall &amp; Halsey 2004), Kabata &amp; Gusev (1966) avoided erecting a new species after observing that, in both forms, females become wider and posterior processes increase in length as individuals grow. Because of the low number of specimens measured at that time, the authors considered that the differences between the two forms could be attributed to developmental variation, not justifying the erection of a different species for the Pacific form; suggesting that their formation must have been caused by recent geographical isolation of their closely related hosts of the genus <i>Raja.</i> The specimens from <i>B. scaphiops</i> differ from both subspecies of <i>Dendrapta</i> in having a longer, but narrower trunk (trunk length:width= 1:0.7, vs 1:1.4 and 1:1.1 for <i>D. c. cameroni</i> and <i>D. c. longiclavata</i>, respectively). The new species also attains a larger size, but its posterior processes are larger than in <i>D. c. cameroni</i> and notably shorter than in <i>D. c. longiclavata</i> (see also Dippenaar et al. 2004). These differences in morphometric relationships indicates that they are not due to intraspecific variability as a consequence of allometric growth (the larger the specimens, the larger the posterior processes), but they are actual interspecific differences. Indeed, the relative size of posterior processes is considered as a reliable diagnostic character for species of <i>Schistobrachia</i> Kabata, 1964 (Dippenaar 2016), a genus closely related to <i>Dendrapta</i> (Dippenaar et al. 2004). Additionally, the armature of the antennule of the new species differs from that of its congeners by having a non-bifid tip of aesthete. Base on the observed differences, a new species, <i>Dendrapta nasicola</i> sp. n. is proposed. Most lernaeopodids are host- and sitespecific (Piasecki et al. 2010), therefore the host species andthe microhabitat (olfactory bulbs) of the present material, along with the geographic region or origin (Southwestern Atlantic), support the erection of a new species of <i>Dendrapta</i>. For the same reasons, the former subspecies <i>D. c. longiclavata</i> is raised to full specific status and should be correctly known as <i>Dendrapta longiclavata</i> n. comb. Kabata &amp; Gusev, 1966.
description: Published as part of <i>Irrigoitia, Manuel M., Taglioretti, Verónica &amp; Timi, Juan T., 2020, Dendrapta nasicola n. sp. (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida: Lernaeopodidae) a parasite from the olfactory sacs of Bathyraja scaphiops (Norman, 1937) in the South Western Atlantic, pp. 1-8 in Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences 92</i> on pages 2-7, DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765202020180933, http://zenodo.org/record/4623802
description: {"references": ["DIPPENAAR SM, OLIVIER PAS &amp; BENZ GW. 2004. Schistobrachia jordaanae n. sp. (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida: Lernaeopodidae) from gill filaments of a diamond ray (Gymnura natalensis) captured in the Indian ocean and a key to species of Schistobrachia, Dendrapta, and Brianella. J Parasitol 90: 481 - 484.", "WALTER TC &amp; BOXSHALL GA. 2018. The World of Copepods - Species. http: // www. marinespecies. org / copepoda / aphia. php? p = taxlist. Accessed 19 Jul 2018.", "KABATA Z &amp; GUSEV AV. 1966. Parasitic Copepoda of fishes from the collection of the Zoological Institute in Leningrad. J Linn Soc Lond Zool 46: 155 - 207.", "KABATA Z. 1988. Copepoda and Branchiura. In: Margolis L and Kabata Z (Eds) Guide to the parasites of fishes of Canada. Part II - Crustacea. Can Spec Publ Fish Aquat Sci, p. 3 - 127.", "BOXSHALL GA &amp; HALSEY SH. 2004. An Introduction to Copepod Diversity. London: Ray Society, 966 p.", "KABATA Z. 1964. Revision of the genus Charopinus Kroyer, 1863 (Copepoda: Lernaeopodidae). Vidensk Meddr Dansk Naturh Foren 127: 85 - 112.", "DIPPENAAR SM. 2016. Schistobrachia Kabata sp. nov. (Siphonostomatoida: Lernaeopodidae) from rajiform hosts off South Africa. Zootaxa 4174: 104 - 113.", "PIASECKI W, MLYNARCZYK M &amp; HAYWARD CJ. 2010. Parabrachiella jarai sp. nov. (Crustacea: Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida) parasitic on Sillago sihama (Actinopterygii: Perciformes: Sillaginidae). Exp Parasitol 125: 55 - 62"]}