Enteromius Cope 1867
Creators: name: Maetens, Heleen
name: Steenberge, Maarten Van
name: Snoeks, Jos
name: Decru, Eva
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2020
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Cypriniformes
Cyprinidae
Enteromius

description: Genus Enteromius Cope, 1867
The results confirmed the occurrence of two syntopic species of Enteromius with a smooth dorsal fin ray in the Lake Edward system. Specimens of group A were conspecific with the types of E. alberti, except for one type specimen, which was assigned to group B, and with the holotype and paratypes of E. cercops. Enteromius alberti used to be considered a synonym of E. stigmatopygus. Based on our results, and following the principle of priority for species names, we propose to revalidate E. alberti with E. cercops as its junior synonym. A redescription of E. alberti is provided based on the lectotype (here designated) (Fig. 7a) and one paralectotype of E. alberti, the type series of E. cercops, here synonymised with E. alberti, and the additional specimens from the Lake Edward system examined in this study and identified as E. alberti (n = 37). The other paralectotype of E. alberti, which was revealed not to be conspecific with E. alberti, was not included in the redescription. The measurements and meristics can be found in Table 2. An illustration of a fresh specimen of E. alberti, captured during the HIPE expeditions is provided in Fig. 7b.
The specimens of group B were most similar to E. mimus, though the PCA on log-transformed measurements (Fig. 6) suggested some differences. Therefore, we decided to assign the specimens of group B to E. cf. mimus with “cf” indicating specimens that are comparable to E. mimus but whose identification is uncertain (Decru et al. 2016). Because of the unsuitable original description of E. mimus for modern taxonomic purposes, we decided to make a redescription based on the lectotype (here designed) (Fig. 8) and eight of the nine paralectotypes of E. mimus. We found one paralectotype to have a serrated dorsal fin ray; therefore, it was considered not to be conspecific with the other types and excluded from the redescription. Specimens from the Lake Edward system identified as E. cf. mimus, the specimens from Tshambi and the aberrant lectotype of E. alberti were not included in the redescription, but their measurements and meristics are given in Table 2. A picture of a fresh specimen of E. cf. mimus is given in Fig. 9.
For both redescribed species, a lectotype was chosen from the syntypes. For E. alberti, this is the specimen illustrated in the original description by Poll (1939), which is also the largest specimen. The lectotype of E. mimus is the specimen that resembles most the original figure of E. mimus in the Catalogue of the Fresh-water Fishes of Africa in the British Museum (Natural History), Volume IV, by Boulenger (1916). The sampling sites of the two species in the Lake Edward system and the type localities of E. mimus, E. alberti and E. cercops are illustrated in Fig. 10. The specimens from Tshambi, initially identified as E. alberti, are indicated as E. cf. mimus on the map, as found in the present study.
description: Published as part of Maetens, Heleen, Steenberge, Maarten Van, Snoeks, Jos & Decru, Eva, 2020, Revalidation of Enteromius alberti and presence of Enteromius cf. mimus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in the Lake Edward system, East Africa, pp. 1-28 in European Journal of Taxonomy 700 on page 12, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.700, http://zenodo.org/record/3981069