Natatolana Bruce 1981
Creators: name: Bruce, Niel L.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2003
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Isopoda
Cirolanidae
Natatolana

description: Natatolana Bruce, 1981
See Brusca et al. (1995) and Keable & Bruce (1997) for synonymy and recent accounts.
Natatolana rekohu sp. nov. (Figs 1 ̵ 4)
Material examined.— Holotype. Male (19.5 mm), Chatham Rise, 46°38.24'S 178°31.39'E, 27 July–14 August 2002, in benthic lander sediment trap, 2769 m, R.V. Tangaroa (NIWA H831). Paratypes. 5 males (18.5, 20.0, 20.5, 23.3, 24.0 [dissected] mm), 13 females (nonovigerous 17.5–26.5 mm), 3 mancas (8.5, 9.1, 12.0 mm), same data as (NIWA P1380). Topotypic material: 86 unmeasured specimens (mostly non­ovigerous females) (NIWA, NMNZ Cr.9950; AM P65202).
Also examined.— Holotype, Natatolana natalis (Menzies & George, 1972), male (17 mm, without previously dissected appendages), Peru – Chile Trench, Mine­Edwards Deep, 8°23'S, 80°25'W, 31 Oct 1965, 2966–2945 metres, Anton Bruun (USNM 121737).
Description: Male. Body 2.9 times as long as greatest width; lateral margins sub­parallel, widest at pereonite 5. Head with incomplete but deep dorsal inter­ocular groove and distinct entire submarginal groove; eyes pale orange in colour, without visible facets. Pereonite 1 about as long as pereonite 2, pereonite 2<3<4>5<6>7; pereonite 2 shortest, pereonite 6 longest. Coxae all with entire oblique suture and fine ventral submarginal suture; posterior margins of coxae 2–3 posteriorly rounded, subtruncate; 4–6 posteriorly narrowly rounded, coxae of pereonites 6 and 7 produced posteriorly beyond pereonite. Pleonite 1 largely visible in dorsal and lateral view, pleonite 2 epimera not produced; pleonite 3 epimera weakly produced, posteriorly acute; pleonite 4 epimera posteriorly rounded, with 1 longitudinal suture. Pleotelson 0.7 times as long as greatest width, lateral margins weakly convex, converging to rounded apex, posterior margin with long PS and 18 RS.
Antennule peduncle article 3 as long as combined lengths of articles 1 and 2; flagellum 0.9 length of peduncle, extending to anterior margin of pereonite 1, with 12 articles, article 1 of which is longest, all articles with aesthetascs. Antenna peduncle article 3 with single cluster of short simple setae at superior distal angle; article 4 1.3 times as long as wide, 1.1 times as long as article 3, narrowing slightly distally, inferior distal angle with 1 plumose seta, superior distal angle with single cluster of short simple setae; article 5 3.2 times as long as wide, 1.5 times as long as article 4, inferior distal angle with 2 plumose setae, superior distal angle with ~4 simple and 1 PS; flagellum 1.5 times as long as peduncle, extending to middle of pereonite 3, 22­articled, each article with anterodistal cluster of 6– 12 short simple setae.
Frontal lamina 3.3 times as long as basal width, lateral margin concave, anterior margins abruptly angled, forming acute median point towards posterior. Mandible spine row with 20 RS, distal 3 bluntly rounded, remainder acute, progressively decreasing in size proximally; molar process without setae or microtrichs, with about 45 acute spines along anterior margin; palp article 2 lateral margin with approximately 45 biserrate setae, article 3 with 13 biserrate RS, distal 3 of which are longest. Maxillule lateral lobe with 13 stout RS on gnathal surface, mesial lobe with 3 large CP robust setae, proximal seta being angled and longest, and 2 small setae. Maxilla lateral lobe with 4 slender simple setae, middle lobe with 13 long and 6 short simple setae; mesial lobe with 6 simple distal setae and about 18 CPS, proximal 3 curved, distinctly longer than others. Maxilliped palp articles 2–5 with both margins setose, those of lateral margins being finely biserrate, longer and less close­set than those of mesial margins; articles 2–5 lateral margins with 10, 18, 10 and 9 slender simple setae respectively; articles 2–4 mesial margins with ~27, ~34 and ~25 slender simple setae respectively; article 5 distal margin with about 14 simple and 5 serrate setae; endite with single coupling hook, 7 large CPS with setules on distal half only and one long simple seta.
Pereopod 1 basis 2.7 times as long as wide, superior proximal margin with 1 small simple seta, superior distal angle with ~11 long simple submarginal setae, inferior margin distal half with row of ~12 long slender simple setae; ischium 0.6 times as long as basis, distal half of inferior margin with cluster of 6 long simple setae, row of 7 long simple setae, mesiodistal angle with 3 large acute RS, lateral surface with submarginal row of 5 long simple setae, distal row of ~ 12 long simple setae; distal half of superior margin with continuous long simple setae; merus 0.7 times as long as ischium, superior distal angle extending to distal three­quarters of propodus, with continuous long slender simple setae, distally with 1 large RS, inferior margin irregular, with 10 acute RS, 2 of which are large; lateral surface with 2 rows of 8 and 5 long simple setae; carpus inferior distal angle with 3 acute RS and 2 simple setae; lateral surface with 2 simple setae; propodus about 2.4 times as long as wide, 0.7 times as long as ischium, inferior margin with 5 RS on palm, distally with 1 large RS and 4 slender setae opposing dactylus, mesial surface with 2 long simple setae, superior distal angle with 4 slender setae; dactylus about 0.7 times as long as of propodus, with long accessory seta and low blunt secondary unguis. Pereopod 2 proportions similar to that of pereopod 1, slightly longer, carpus proportionally longer; merus superior distal angle with 3 large acute RS, inferior margin with 10 RS, 7 of which are large; carpus inferior margin with 10 acute RS and clusters of 2 and 3 short simple slender setae; propodus inferior margin with 4 acute RS. Pereopod 3 similar to pereopod 2. Pereopod 4 intermediate in form between pereopods 1–3 and 5–7. Pereopod 6 similar to pereopod 7. Pereopod 7 basis 2.5 times as long as wide, superior margin weakly convex, inferior margin straight, with continuous row of close­set long PS, lateral margin with continuous median row of close­set PS, these being shorter than distal or inferior PS, superior margin with distal two­thirds with short simple setae, 4 small widely­spaced setae, distal margin with long plumose setae extending to distal margin of ischium; ischium 0.5 times as long as basis, 1.6 times as long as distal width, superior distal margin with ~ 4 widely spaced simple setae, superior distal angle with ~5 long simple setae and 9 acute RS, mediodistal margin with 3 acute RS, inferior margin with 2 clusters of 2 and 2 submarginal acute RS and continuous long PS, inferior distal angle with 4 small acute RS; merus 0.7 times as long as ischium, 1.3 times as long as distal width, superior distal angle with 12 long acute RS and ~ 4 long simple setae, inferior margin with 8 long simple setae on distal half with 2 clusters of 2 and 2 acute submarginal RS and 1 marginal RS, inferior distal angle with 11 RS and 5 long simple setae; carpus 0.7 times as long as ischium, 2.1 times as long as distal width, superior distal angle with 10 long acute RS and ~ 6 long simple setae, inferior margin with 2 clusters of 3 and 3 marginal RS and one cluster of 3 submarginal RS, inferior distal angle with about 15 long and short RS; propodus 0.8 times as long as ischium, 5.5 times as long as greatest width, superior angle with 6 slender setae, inferior margin 3 clusters of 2, 3 and 3 RS and 2 slender seta, inferior distal angle with 4 acute RS.
Penes flat, separated by 2.5 basal width of penial process, 1.5 times as long as basal width, with lateral margins converging slightly to broadly rounded apex.
Pleopod 1 endopod 0.9 times as long as exopod, mesial margin straight, lateral margin weakly concave, both margins with PS on distal half only; exopod widest distally, distal margin subtruncate, lateral margin straight, mesial margins weakly convex, PS present on distal margin and on distal three­quarters of lateral margin; peduncle with 11 coupling hooks. Pleopod 2 exopod with PS on distal half, endopod PS on distal margin and distal two­thirds of lateral margin; peduncle with 5 coupling hooks; appendix masculina curving laterally, about 8.5 times as long as basal width, 5.5 times as long as greatest width, widest subdistally, distolateral margin convex, apex with short lobe armed with approximately 10 teeth. Pleopods 3–5 with exopod suture indistinct, visible only marginally.
Uropod peduncle ventrolateral angle with 4 acute RS and 3 long slender PS; exopod 4.5 times as long as greatest width, 0.9 times as long as endopod, lateral margin with 11 acute RS and continuous row of short PS, mesial margin with 6 RS, both margins weakly convex, converging to narrow apex; endopod 2.6 times as long as wide, lateral margin weakly convex with 6 RS, and PS on distal three­quarters, mesial margin convex with 7 RS and continuous PS.
Female: Similar to male with the exception of the sexual characters. No significant differences in terms of setation or body proportions.
Var ia t io n: (from holotype and paratypes; n = 19 specimens, 6 males, 13 females; for uropodal rami n equals the number of rami). Pleotelson (n = 18) with 12–18 RS, with 16 (as 8+8) and 15 most frequent (each 22%), 17 and 18 each at 17%, and 22% with 12–14; a large number of specimens had received some damage to pleotelson resulting in asymmetric distribution of RS on either side of the apical point. Uropod (all rami n = 38 except exopod n = 37) endopod mesial margin with 5–9, with 7 (47%) and 8 most (26%) frequent, lateral with 4–8 RS 5 (26%) and 6 (50%) most frequent, with the most frequent pattern being 3+3, with 5+3, 4+3, 2+3, 2+2, 3+2 and 4+2 also occurring at least once; exopod mesial margin with 5–7, 6 (66%) or 7 RS (18%) most frequent, lateral margin with 9–13, 11 (38%) or 12 (32%) most frequent, with 13 occurring twice. The variation in the number of RS on the uropod exopod lateral margin is probably greater than is actual owing to the difficulty of discerning the anterior­most 1 or 2 RS, when these were missing so the maximum number of RS is likely to be an underestimate.
Pereopod 1 (n = 38) had 5–9 RS on the palm (one specimen with 9) with 5 (63%) or 6 (29%) most frequent; palm of pereopod 2 (n = 38) with 3–7 RS, usually with 4 (50%) or 5(26%) occasionally 3 (five times), or 6 (three times) or 7 (once). The variation in the number of RS on the pereopod palm is usually due to a small RS positioned adjacent to one or more of the large RS. Larger specimens had the greater number of RS.
Mancas (3 measured) had fewer slender setae and less robust setae, though one had 14 RS on the uropodal exopod lateral margin.
Size: Males 18.5–24.0 mm, females 17.5–24.5 mm, both with a mean of 21 mm; mancas 8.5–12.0 mm.
Remarks: Natatolana rekohu, sp. nov. can be identified by the eyes lacking facets and pigment; strongly indented anterior margin of the head; pentagonal frontal lamina with weakly convex lateral margins; pleonites 1 and 2 not produced, 3 weakly so (no ‘point’) and pleonite 4 rounded; and pereopods 1 and 2 usually with 5 or 6 setae on the propodal palm. In males the large flat and widely separated penes and the strongly curved, wide and terminally toothed appendix masculina are species­specific characters. As in most Natatolana the number of robust setae on the margins of the uropodal rami and pleotelson is important in making a correct identification—details of these for N. rekohu are noted under the heading variation.
Three species display a similar appearance to N. rekohu the North Atlantic Natatolana imicola (Dollfus, 1903) (redescribed by Keable & Bruce 1997), the poorly­known southern East Pacific species Natatolana natalis (Menzies & George, 1972) and the southern Indian Ocean Natatolana anophthalma (Kussakin & Vasina, 1982). Natatolana imicola differs in numerous details, the most obvious of which are, pereopod 2 propodal palm with only 2 robust setae, penial processes tubular or absent (there appear to be two ‘forms’ of this species), and in generally having fewer robust setae on the uropods and pleotelson margins as follows: (number(s) in brackets is that which is most frequent) pleotelson with 10–12 vs 12–18 (15–16] in N. rekohu; endopod mesial 4–7 (5) vs 5–9 (7 or 8), lateral 4–4 (4) vs 4–8 (6); exopod mesial 3–5, (4) vs 5–7 (6), lateral 6–8 (7) vs 9–14 (11 or 12). Keable & Bruce (1997) did not include 2 distal­most small robust setae on uropod rami (apex) in the marginal counts for N. imicola, so the counts presented here have been adjusted to include these. The difference on number of robust setae in the propodal palm of pereopods 1–3 and in the margins of the pleotelson and uropodal rami allow males and females of the two species to be unambiguously identified.
Natatolana natalis is known only from the holotype, and the original description is too poor and incomplete to allow for accurate comparisons to be made to other similar species. The holotype is in poor condition and has been dissected but the removed appendages are not with the specimen (which retains only a single uropodal ramus). Examination of the holotype revealed that the penial processes are longer and more widely set apart than in N. rekohu, and the original figures show that the appendix masculina is more slender, while Keable & Bruce (1997) noted in the ‘Remarks’ for N. imicola, that the appendix masculina of N. natalis has an acute and projecting apex. The pleotelson is rubbed, and it is not possible to be certain as to the number of robust setae that would be present, but sockets indicate that it is likely to be 12 not 15 or 16 as in N. rekohu; the apex of the pleotelson is narrower than in N. rekohu, and while only a multi­specimen description will allow for full characterisation of N. natalis, the observable differences are convincing that it is distinct to N. rekohu.
Natatolana anophthalma (Kussakin & Vasina, 1982) lacks eyes, and is generally similar in appearance to N. rekohu. The description is minimal with little species­level detail, and counts for robust setae were not given for the pleotelson and uropodal rami. It was stated that the pleotelson is ‘serrate with moderately long setae’ and ‘lateral margins of pleotelson without spines’. Comparing the figures to N. rekohu: the body shape is wider; appendix masculina is similar but narrower; pleonite 3 possibly more strongly produced and it appears that the uropod endopod is distally more acute than in N. rekohu. The two nominal taxa occupy greatly different depth ranges — N. rekohu at 2769 metres, N. anophthalma 175 metres at the type locality; [Kensley (1989) recorded N. anophthalma at 1430– 1600 metres at St. Paul and Amsterdam Islands, although the identity of that record was regarded as doubtful by Keable (unpublished)] further supporting that these are different species.
The specimens were taken from a ‘benthic lander’ sediment trap together with the remains of single fish which had died in the trap and on which the isopods has been feeding. This indicates that, in common with most species of Natatolana, N. rekohu is a scavenger.
Distribution: Known only from the type locality.
Etymology: The epithet is taken from the Moriori name for Chatham Island from which the rise takes its name.
description: Published as part of Bruce, Niel L., 2003, A new deep­water species of Natatolana (Crustacea: Isopoda: Cirolanidae) from the Chatham Rise, eastern New Zealand, pp. 1-12 in Zootaxa 265 on pages 2-11, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.156238