Heliocypha vantoli Hämäläinen 2016, spec. nov.
Creators: name: Hämäläinen, Matti
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2016
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Odonata
Chlorocyphidae
Heliocypha
Heliocypha vantoli

description: Heliocypha vantoli spec. nov. (Figures 1–3)
Material studied: Holotype ♂: Indonesia, Mentawai Islands (off Sumatra), Siberut Island, Madoba; ca. 1o 35’ S, 99o 09’ E; alt. 60 m asl., 29–31 January 2013, K.A. Kolesnichenko leg. Paratypes: 3 ♂ 1 ♀, same data as in holotype. Holotype deposited at RMNH (Leiden, The Netherlands)
Etymology. This species is named after Dr Jan van Tol to honour his significant contributions to our knowledge of the Southeast Asian odonate fauna, particularly that of Sulawesi and nearby islands, and also in appreciation of his valued leadership of the ‘DAWN (Damselfly Workers Naturalis)—group’ of the Naturalis Biodiversity Center in Leiden.
Holotype male. Head. Black throughout with small, oblong, ochreous spot beside each lateral ocellus and with tiny round dot on either side of occiput.
Thorax (cf. Fig. 2a, 2b). Prothorax black with distinct pinkish magenta anterodorsal marking on hind lobe. Synthorax black with pinkish magenta dorsal triangle and with broad, pinkish magenta, irregularly shaped antehumeral stripe on mesepisternum. This stripe broadest in anterior half and narrowing towards wing base, bending ventrad along antealar ridge where it is narrowly tinged with pale blue. Small yellowish marking on mesostigmal laminae, not connected with antehumeral stripe. Irregularly shaped, pale cerulean lateral stripe on metepisternum, connected to similarly coloured marking on anterior edge of mesepimeron; this lateral stripe slightly narrower than antehumeral stripe. Small pale cerulean marking on metepimeron near wing base. Venter of thorax black with posterior and lower half of lateral borders of poststernum and poststernal membranes pale. Legs black, inner surfaces of middle and hind femora creamy yellow; those of middle and hind tibiae white.
Wings. Shaped as in Fig. 2c, wing apices distinctly rounded, especially in hindwing. Opaque area extensive in both wings, starting anterior to nodus. Hind wing with seven vitreous fenestrae (“windows”) arranged as in Fig. 2c. Basal fenestra long, covering 18 cells and extending to hyaline area at wing base. Lowest fenestra in middle of hindwing very long, covering 20 cells. At certain angles, dark background on either side of both wings reflects green, magenta or violet iridescence, especially striking in hindwing. Pterostigma dark in both wings.
Abdomen. Black, except with a small, mid-lateral pale blue spots near apices of S1, S2, S3 and S4. Spots on S1 and S2 a little larger than the others. Tiny remnant of pale ventrolateral stripe on S1 and S2. Appendages black, of the typical shape for the genus.
Measurements (in mm). Hindwing 21.5; abdomen (incl. appendages) 19.
Variation in paratype males. The wing colour pattern is quite similar in all specimens. There is some small variation in the pale markings of thorax and abdomen, obviously partly age dependant. In two males the pale marking on the metepimeron is a little larger and longer than in holotype and in two males abdominal S4 lacks a lateral pale spot.
Measurements (in mm). Hindwing 21.5–22.5; abdomen (incl. appendages) 19–20.
Female. Head with orange markings much more extensive than in male. Middle and lateral lobes of labium pale at basal one third. Labrum with a pair of orange dots. Borders of eye narrowly orange up to level of lateral ocelli. Yellow markings on dorsal side of head as in Fig. 3b. Venter of head partly pruinosed.
Thorax (Fig. 3b). Prothorax black with small pale/ochreous spots on sides of fore, middle and hind lobes. Distinct triangular posterodorsal marking on hind lobe connected with narrow orange stripe, which reaches anterior edge of hindlobe. Synthorax black with narrow, reddish brown antehumeral stripe on mesepisternum; much narrower than in male. This stripe narrowing towards wing base and turning ventrad along antealar ridge. Small pale marking on mesostigmal laminae, not connected with antehumeral stripe. Irregularly shaped, orange ochre lateral stripe on metepisternum, connected to similarly coloured marking on anterior edge of mesepimeron; this stripe resembling that in male, but a little broader. Elongated, slightly angulate, pale patch in posterior third of metepimeron near wing base. Venter of thorax coloured as in male. Legs black, trochanters and inner surface of middle and hind femora partly greyish brown.
Wings. Both wings deeply suffused with brown (Fig. 3a), especially strongly so in apical third and along costal margins distad from level of nodus in forewing and slightly further basad in hindwing. Pterostigma greyish white with anterior corner obscurely brown.
Abdomen. Largely black with pale markings as follows (Fig 3a, 3b). S1 with triangular marking, directed ventrad. S2, S3 and S4 with short mid-lateral stripe in apical half of each segment, with small round mid-lateral spot near apex and obscure short ventrolateral stipe in middle of segment. Pale markings on S4 tiny, almost obsolete. Dorsal carina of S3–S7 narrowly yellow, yellow colour not reaching either base or apex of each segments. Intersegmental rings, except the three most apical ones, narrowly yellow.
Measurements (in mm). Hindwing 24.5; abdomen (incl. appendages) 18.
Distinguishing characters. Apart from this new species, only other two Sumatran chlorocyphid taxa have vitreous fenestrae in the partly opaque male hindwings. These are Heliocypha a. angusta and H. angusta oceanis. Heliocypha vantoli spec. nov. is easy to separate from these two by the shape of the wings. In H. vantoli the wings (Fig. 2c) are proportionally broader and shorter than in H. a. angusta (Fig. 4a) and H. angusta oceanis (Fig. 4b). Moreover, the wing tips are distinctly more rounded in H. vantoli. The overall arrangement of the fenestrae is quite similar in these three taxa, but H. vantoli differs by having a much longer row of iridescent cells in the basal fenestra in the central part of the hindwing. In H. vantoli, the extent of opaque area in wings is much greater than in H. angusta, especially in the forewing.
The colour pattern of the male thorax also differs. In H. vantoli (Figs. 1, 2a, 2b) the pale markings are less extensive than in H. a. angusta (Fig. 4c). H. angusta oceanis (Fig. 4d) differs from both H. a. angusta and H. vantoli by having very restricted pale lateral markings. The female of H. vantoli is readily distinguished by its strongly brown tinted wings; in females of H. a. angusta and H. angusta oceanis the wings are hyaline.
H. a. angusta is common and widespread in Sumatra (Lieftinck 1935). The type locality of H. angusta is Bencoolen [Bengkulu] at the west coast of southern Sumatra, where the Danish naval officer I.K. Daldorff collected the teneral male holotype in 1800. The specimen is still in good condition and preserved in ZMUC (Copenhagen). H. angusta oceanis is endemic to Enggano. The holotype male and a long series of paratypes of both sexes, collected by J.K. de Jong in 1936, are at RMNH (Leiden). Lieftinck (1947, 1948) ranked oceanis as a subspecies and pointed out that melanism is a typical modification among several other dragonfly species in Enggano, but there are also marked exceptions in this rule; some of the Enggano odonata forms are lighter in colour than in mainland Sumatra. It could be argued that H. angusta oceanis deserves specific status. However, as its wing shape and arrangement of vitrious fenestrae match well with those in H. a. angusta, it is better to wait for further evidence before considering any change in the taxon’s status.
Most likely H. vantoli is endemic to Siberut Island. Its occurrence in other major islands of Mentawai is of course not ruled out.
Notes on the knowledge of Mentawai Odonata. The dragonfly fauna of Mentawai islands (Siberut, Sipura, North Pagai, South Pagai) is still inadequately known. In September-November 1924 the entomologists Cecil Boden Kloss, Norman Smedley and Heinrich Karny collected in Siberut and Sipura. Laidlaw (1926) identified 34 species from their material, including 27 species from Siberut, 18 from Sipura and 8 from the Pagai islands. In the earlier literature only one dragonfly specimen had been recorded from Mentawai, i.e. the holotype male of Euphaea modiagliani Selys, 1898, collected by Elio Modigliani on ‘Ile Metawei’ (Selys Longchamps 1898). It is known that the only island in Mentawai visited by Modigliani was Sipura, where he collected in 1894. Lieftinck’s (1954) handlist did not include any additions to those species listed by Laidlaw (1926). As far as I know, later only one addition to the fauna has been published; Karube & Yeh (2001) listed Oligoaeschna sumatrana Lieftinck, 1953 from ‘Sibelute I.’ (misspelling of Siberut Island). In addition Lieftinck (1968) reidentified Laidlaw’s (1926) ‘ Jagoria modigliani Selys’ from Siberut and Sipura as a new species Oligoaeschna uropetala Lieftinck, 1968. In earlier literature only three calopterygoid species are listed from the Mentawai islands: Libellago sumatrana (Sipura), Euphaea modigliani (Sipura) and Vestalis lugens Albarda in Selys, 1879 (Siberut, Sipura). The recent calopterygoid material from Siberut, which I received for study, also includes specimens of Vestalis lugens (2 males, 1 female) and Euphaea aspasia Selys, 1853 (10 males), with the same collecting data as for H. vantoli. E. aspasia is a new record to the Mentawai islands. The E. aspasia males from Siberut lack pale markings on the head and prothorax and the pale markings on the synthorax are restricted to narrow stripes on the metepisternum and metepimeron. The wings lack the distinct hyaline lower margins present in the mainland Sumatran specimens. The Siberut specimens are also slightly smaller. The Siberut form could qualify as a distinct insular subspecies. The two additions bring the number of Odonata species listed from these islands to 38.
description: Published as part of Hämäläinen, Matti, 2016, Description of Heliocypha vantoli spec. nov. from Siberut in the Mentawai Islands (Odonata: Chlorocyphidae), pp. 495-500 in Zootaxa 4079 (4) on pages 495-499, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4079.4.9, http://zenodo.org/record/1050875