Major Shifts in the DOJ due to January 6th Prosecution: What Could this Mean for the United States Democratic Processes?
Creators: name: Dunaj, Chloe
Publisher: name: American University
Year: 2025

description: An article published by Bloomberg Law on February 28th, 2025, reported how the current U.S.  attorney, Ed Martin, demoted January 6th case supervisors [1]. An unprecedented act in legal history, supervisors working on the cases are now reduced to working in a limited capacity to prosecute those who were involved in the riots at the D.C. Capitol building.  <br>January 6th, 2021, was a historic day in United States history. During the certification of election results in Congress, supporters of President Trump stormed the Capitol building in protest of his loss. The event was preceded by a speech given by President Trump in which he encouraged his supporters to protest the election results. The attack ended, inciting violence once rioters stormed the building and began vandalizing the Capitol. Rioters overtook Capitol Police officers, and five people were killed during the attack, including a Capitol Police officer who was beaten to death by rioters. The delayed deployment of the National Guard lays at the center of the alleged spontaneity of the event. A Pentagon inspector general report said that the D.C. National Guard was informed of the authorization at 4:35 p.m. on Jan. 6, but the Guard maintained it was not told until 5:08 [2]. A House of Representatives committee was created to investigate the attack on the Capitol and brought forward more than 650 witnesses and issued close to 100 subpoenas for testimony [3]. The Department of Justice initiated over 1,500 cases in the aftermath of the event, the largest prosecution in its history [4]. During his campaign, President Trump claimed, if elected, he would fight for anyone prosecuted for the Jan. 6 attack to get their cases thrown out. The question of whether this is within Trump’s capacity as president remains. And if he gets it done, what does this mean for the nation’s federal legal system? <br>On his first official day as president, Trump granted clemency to every person charged or convicted for their role in the Capitol attack. The pardons only apply to people “convicted of offenses related to events that occurred at or near the United States Capitol on January 6th, 2021”  [5]. In his White House proclamation authorizing the pardons, he wrote, “This proclamation ends a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years and begins the process of a national reconciliation” [6]. Among those pardoned were Kelly  Meggs, Stewart Rhodes, and Jessica Watkins, all of whom were previously charged and convicted with seditious conspiracy, the highest penalty charged to those associated with the attack. Ed Martin, Washington’s top federal prosecutor, was a former advocate for Jan. 6 Capitol rioters and has already overseen the dismissal of hundreds of criminal cases against those who participated in the attack.  <br>There are future implications for cases like that of Jan. 6, and legal trends are subject to unforeseen consequences. One impact is upon the DOJ itself. According to its website, “The mission of the Department of Justice is to uphold the rule of law, to keep our country safe, and to protect civil rights” [7]. The rule of law is being ridiculed by the pardoning and reduced working capacity of those involved in prosecuting the January 6th cases. Fifteen of those charged with seditious conspiracy had their sentences commuted, even though all were found guilty. President Trump has been weaponizing the DOJ by appointing leaders with a history of extreme loyalty to Trump when it is supposed to remain a politically neutral administration. While it is traditional for presidents to appoint those who align with their party’s ideals, such as President Biden’s judicial nomination of Supreme Court judge Ketanji Brown, Trump has gone too far. His nomination, for example, for the head of the Department of Government Efficiency, is Elon Musk. He is the richest man in the country, despite not being from the United States. Musk also bought Twitter to reformulate its algorithm to promote far-right content, along with a $300 million campaign donation contribution to Trump’s campaign [8]. The term for political actors who support Trump has garnered a new name, “Trump loyalists,” and essentially split the Republican party in two between MAGA advocates and opponents. Trump has also restructured the DOJ and laid off personnel who worked on the Jan.  6th cases. Experts are concerned that the pardons can also legitimize political violence and embolden extremists. Heidi Beirich, co-founder of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism, stated, “This move doesn’t just rewrite the narrative of January 6...It sets a dangerous precedent that political violence is a legitimate tool in American democracy” [9].  Trump referred to those who participated on Jan. 6 as “patriots” and “political prisoners”, even though most crimes committed were documented on camera.  <br>The politicization of the DOJ is a worrying sign for many Americans. A historically neutral administration that authorizes the highest federal court cases in the country could be weaponized to further a political agenda. This is unforeseen in America’s history and speaks to the shifting nature of legal precedent and American democratic processes. The government spent over $2.75 billion because of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and many of these resources have gone to waste due to President Trump’s actions [10]. January 6th marked a dark day in American history that seemingly continues to pervade different aspects of the American legal system. More updates on this issue are sure to come as it unfolds within the DOJ. <br><b>Sources:</b>Ben Penn &amp; Suzanne Monyak, Acting US attorney Ed Martin demotes Jan. 6 case  supervisors (1) Bloomberg Law (2025), https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/us attorney-ed-martin-demotes-jan-6-case-supervisors. American Oversight, The January 6 attack on the U.S. capitol American Oversight (2024),  https://americanoversight.org/investigation/the-january-6-attack-on-the-u-s-capitol/.Ellis Kim, Sara Cook &amp; Zak Hudak, House January 6 committee aiming to publish interim  report this June, Panel’s chair says CBS News (2022), https://www.cbsnews.com/news/january 6-select-committee-interim-report-timeline/. Alanna Durkan-Richer &amp; Michael Kunzelman, Here’s where Jan. 6 trials stand on the fourth  anniversary of the Capitol Riot PBS (2025), https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/heres-where jan-6-trials-stand-on-the-fourth-anniversary-of-the-capitol-riot. Tom Dreisbach, Criminal Records of Jan. 6 rioters pardoned by trump include rape, domestic  violence NPR (2025), https://www.npr.org/2025/01/30/nx-s1-5276336/donald-trump-jan-6-rape assault-pardons-rioters. The White House, Granting pardons and commutation of sentences for certain offenses  relating to the events at or near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021 The White House  (2025), https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/granting-pardons-and commutation-of-sentences-for-certain-offenses-relating-to-the-events-at-or-near-the-united states-capitol-on-january-6-2021/. Department of Justice, About DOJ Department of Justice | About DOJ | United States  Department of Justice (2025), https://www.justice.gov/about. Katie Hawkinson, Elon Musk dropped nearly $300m supporting Donald Trump in 2024 The  Independent (2025), https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/elon musk-donald-trump-2024-election-b2690735.html. Ali Swenson &amp; Lindsay Whitehurst, Experts worry that Trump’s Jan. 6 pardons will  legitimize political violence, embolden extremists AP News (2025),  https://apnews.com/article/trump-pardons-jan-6-extremists-capitol-riot-proud-boys bdd25aa653ceb2a2db6fd3ef2f9bda6e . Robert Kahn, What cost treason? Courthouse News Service (2024), https://www.courthousenews.com/what-cost-treason/.