cometadata/datacite-rtg-text-other-reclassification-records huggingface dataset:
Apecholinus imitator Smetana & Hu 2019
Creators: name: Hu, Fang-Shuo
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2020
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Staphylinidae
Apecholinus
Apecholinus imitator

description: Apecholinus imitator Smetana & Hu, 2019
(Figs. 5–6)
Material examined. TAIWAN: Pingtung County: 1 spec., Tahanshan (± ÀƜ), 25.IV.2017. leg. B.-X. Guo (TARI); 1 female, Chun-jih, Ta-han shan, ± ÀƜ, 1350m, 2019,V-13 (Night), Y.- T. Chung Leg. CCCC (FSHc); 1 female, Majia Forest Trail (ṞxIJǎ), Majia To., 28-VI-2017, leg. R. H. Liu (FSHc); 1 spec., CCCC, Tahanshan (± ÀƜ), 15.IV.2019. leg. Y.- T. Chung (TARI).
Description. For male description see Smetana & Hu (2019).
Female. Genital segment. Tergite 10 (Fig. 6) obviously different from male tergite 10. Apical portion of female tergite 10 markedly narrow and elongated, with narrow acute apical portion; setae are relatively concentrated on the apex.
Diagnosis. Apecholinus imitator can be distinguished from all other species of Apecholinus in Taiwan by the golden-yellow tomentose setae on the body. An undescribed species of Apecholinus in Taiwan is similar to this species but it currently known only from a single female, so I refrain from describing it until male specimens are found. The patches of golden-yellow tomentose pubescence on the elytra of Ap. imitator are much larger than that of the undescribed species.
Bionomics. Based on an import of locality name into Google Earth from collection data (Smetana & Hu 2019 and this study), the species occurs from 800–1700 m. One specimen of Ap. imitator was collected by pitfall trap but nothing known about the habitat the traps were set in; some specimens of Ap. imitator were attracted to an LED flashlight in the evening on a forest trail (Smetana & Hu 2019).
Distribution. Apecholinus imitator is at present known from central and southern Taiwan including Nantou County, Taitung County and Pingtung County (Smetana & Hu 2019, this study).
Remarks. Up to the present, the morphology of females in Apecholinus is poorly known. So far, only females of Ap. fraternus (see Smetana 2018), Ap. liui (He & Zhou, 2017) (see He & Zhou 2017) and Ap. kaiseri Bernhauer, 1933 (see Smetana 2003) had been described and female tergite 10 of these species is similar to that of the male. However, the apical portion of tergite 10 of Ap. imitator is much narrower and more elongate in females than in males.
description: Published as part of Hu, Fang-Shuo, 2020, New distributional records of Staphylinina in Taiwan, including a new species of Miobdelus Sharp (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae: Staphylinini), pp. 334-360 in Zootaxa 4768 (3) on page 337, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4768.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/3784036
Dinothenarus (Dinothenarus) choui Smetana 1992
Creators: name: Hu, Fang-Shuo
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2020
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Staphylinidae
Dinothenarus
Dinothenarus choui

description: Dinothenarus (Dinothenarus) choui Smetana, 1992
(Fig. 7)
Type material. Allotype (female) in NMNS: TAIWAN, Taichung Hsien [= Taichung City], Anmashan [Daxue Mt. (±ũƜ)] 2230m, 30.IV.–4. V.90, A. Smetana [T32]// ALLOTYPE, Dinothenarus choui A. Smetana 1991 [hand writing, red label]// 057621. The specimen in good condition, mounted on the card, the terminal segment was dissected and mounted on a plastic card by Euparal.
Diagnosis. Dinothenarus choui is the only species of the genus in Taiwan. It can be easily distinguished from other Staphylinina in Taiwan by its reddish-orange head.
Apecholinus fraternus: male. 5–6. Apecholinus imitator: female and female tergite 10. 7. Dinothenarus choui: female, allotype and attached labels. Scale bars: 1–5, 7: 3 mm; 6: 0.5 mm
Bionomics. Types were collected under damaged bags of rotting fertiliser or from a dung baited pitfall trap (Smetana 1992). It seems to be associated with putrefaction.
Distribution. Dinothenarus choui is only known from two counties in central and southern Taiwan (Taichung City and Chiayi County) (Smetana 1992).
description: Published as part of Hu, Fang-Shuo, 2020, New distributional records of Staphylinina in Taiwan, including a new species of Miobdelus Sharp (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae: Staphylinini), pp. 334-360 in Zootaxa 4768 (3) on pages 337-339, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4768.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/3784036
All supplementary figures from The modified elevated gap interaction test: A novel paradigm to assess social preference.
Creators: name: de Zeeuw, Chris I
name: Yu, Si-yang
name: Chen, Jiawei
name: van Hoogstraten, Willem S
name: Bosman, Laurens W.J.
name: van den Maagdenberg, Arn M.J.M.
name: Kros, Lieke
Publisher: name: The Royal Society
Year: 2024
Subjects: classificationCode: 320999
subject: Neurosciences not elsewhere classified

description: Supplementary Figures De Zeeuw et al MEGIT.pdf
Naddia taiwanensis Shibata 1979
Creators: name: Hu, Fang-Shuo
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2020
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Staphylinidae
Naddia
Naddia taiwanensis

description: Naddia taiwanensis Shibata, 1979
(Fig. 13)
Material examined. TAIWAN: Nantou County: 1 female, Huisun Forest Area, Renai Township (èḵIJợ), 26.VII.2016 - 11.VIII.2016, by MLT, leg. W. R. Liang (FSHc); 1 female, same data as above except 15.IV.2016 – 20. V.2016 (FSHc); 1 male, Chunyang [Ɓọ], V /11–VII/13/2004, C. S. Lin & W. T. Yang, Malaise trap (KCN) [NMNS ENT 5249-5515] (NMNS); 1 female, same data as above except No: II Sampling plots, IV/10– V /8/2007 [NMNS ENT 7530-1035] (NMNS); 1 male, Yuchig Lienhuachi [ẅƤô], V–VI/19-9/1998, C. S. Lin & W. T. Yang, Mlaise trap [= Malaise trap] [NMNS ENT 3161-1421] (NMNS); 1 spec., Formosa [=Taiwan], Musha [=Wushe (= Ḩ)], 1919. V. 18– V. 19, T. Okuni, J. Sonan (TARI); 1 spec., Lushan [ƋƜ], VI. 25.1997, C.C.Lo, None (NMNS). New Taipei City: 1 female, Qiancuokeng (Ṇĸḿ), Taishan Dist., 04-VIII-2017, leg. C. K. Liu (FSHc); 1 spec., Wanli Distric. [Aoiȅ], IX/10–X/14/2014, W. T. Yang & K. W. Huang, Malaise trap (KCN) (NMNS). Taipei City: 1 male, Huagang [ƤN], 28.III.1995, leg. K. L. Li [the collection label was printed in Chinese, all collection data was translated to English herein] (NMNS); 1 spec., Lengshuikeng (ṅửḿ), 13. VI.2009, leg. H. Lee (TARI); 1 female, Xiang Mt. (ÞƜ), Xinyi District 20-III-2020, leg. M. H. Hsiao (FSHc); Taoyuan City: 1 female, Lala Mt. Fuxing District (ḤḤƜ), 09.VII.2017, by hand, leg. Y. H. Ho (FSHc).
Diagnosis. Naddia taiwanensis can be easily distinguished from other members of Naddia Fauvel, 1867 in Taiwan by its elytra, which are entirely covered with orange-red pubescence.
Bionomics. Many specimens of N. taiwanensis were collected by Malaise trap from middle elevation mountainous forests. Shibata (1979) reported the types series of N. taiwanensis were collected under a dead tree or from fallen leaves on the forest ground.
Distribution. Naddia taiwanensis is only known from Taiwan but is widespread on the island. The species is at present known from Nantou County, New Taipei City, Pingtung County, Taipei City, and Taoyuan City (Shibata, 1979, this study), and is presumably distributed in mountainous areas of the entire island.
description: Published as part of Hu, Fang-Shuo, 2020, New distributional records of Staphylinina in Taiwan, including a new species of Miobdelus Sharp (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae: Staphylinini), pp. 334-360 in Zootaxa 4768 (3) on page 344, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4768.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/3784036
Creophilus
Creators: name: Hu, Fang-Shuo
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2020
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Staphylinidae
Creophilus

description: Creophilus group
Creophilus flavipennis (Hope, 1831)
Creophilus maxillosus maxillosus (Linnaeus, 1758)
description: Published as part of Hu, Fang-Shuo, 2020, New distributional records of Staphylinina in Taiwan, including a new species of Miobdelus Sharp (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae: Staphylinini), pp. 334-360 in Zootaxa 4768 (3) on page 350, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4768.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/3784036
Ocypus Leach 1819
Creators: name: Hu, Fang-Shuo
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2020
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Staphylinidae
Ocypus

description: Ocypus group
Agelosus auricomus Smetana & Hu, 2019
Apecholinus canifer Smetana & Hu, 2019
Apecholinus fraternus Fairmaire, 1891
Apecholinus imitator Smetana & Hu, 2019
Dinothenarus (Dinothenarus) choui Smetana, 1992
Eucibdelus sauteri Bernhauer, 1943
Eucibdelus (Pareucibdelus) shibatai Hayashi, 1998
Miobdelus choui Smetana, 2001
Miobdelus humilis sp. nov.
Miobdelus insularis insularis Smetana, 2001
Miobdelus insularis kuai Smetana, 2001
Miobdelus insularis tenchi Smetana, 2001
Miobdelus taiwanensis apicalis Smetana, 2001
Miobdelus taiwanensis taiwanensis Smetana, 2001
Nelmanwaslus ornatus Smetana, 2006
Sphaerobulbus miwai (Bernhauer, 1943) comb. nov.
Phytolinus formosanus Naomi, 1984
Trichocosmetes minor Schillhammer, 2001
description: Published as part of Hu, Fang-Shuo, 2020, New distributional records of Staphylinina in Taiwan, including a new species of Miobdelus Sharp (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae: Staphylinini), pp. 334-360 in Zootaxa 4768 (3) on page 357, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4768.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/3784036
Platydracus Thomson 1858
Creators: name: Hu, Fang-Shuo
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2020
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Coleoptera
Staphylinidae
Platydracus

description: Platydracus group
Naddia ishiharai Shibata, 1994
Naddia monticola Shibata, 1994
Naddia taiwanensis Shibata, 1979
Ontholestes oculatus Sharp, 1874
Platydracus (Platydracus) circumcinctus (Bernhauer, 1914)
Platydracus (Platydracus) formosae (Bernhauer, 1933)
Platydracus (Platydracus) juang Smetana, 2005
Platydracus (Platydracus) plagiicollis (Fairmaire, 1891)
Thoracostrongylus formosanus Shibata, 1982
Thoracostrongylus miyakei Bernhauer, 1943
description: Published as part of Hu, Fang-Shuo, 2020, New distributional records of Staphylinina in Taiwan, including a new species of Miobdelus Sharp (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae: Staphylinini), pp. 334-360 in Zootaxa 4768 (3) on page 358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4768.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/3784036
Cosmolestes fulvus Horvath 1893
Creators: name: Kment, Petr
name: Rédei, Dávid
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2018
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hemiptera
Reduviidae
Cosmolestes
Cosmolestes fulvus

description: Cosmolestes fulvus Horváth, 1893
(Figs 8–11)
Cosmolestes fulvus Horváth, 1893: 263 (original description).
Cosmolestes fulvus: LETHIERRY & SEVERIN (1896):190 (catalogue); SCHOU- TEDEN (1932): 193 (list of species, distribution); VILLIERS (1950): 76 (record); VILLIERS (1954a): 18 (record); MALDONADO CAPRILES (1990): 188 (catalogue).
Type locality. ‘Africa centralis (HOLUB)’ [= Southern and southern-central Africa between Cape Town and Kafue River, Zambia].
Type material examined. HOLOTYPE: ♀ (HNHM), ‘978 / 15. [hw, with p frame and p horizontal line across middle] // Holub [p, pink label] // Africa / centralis [Horváth’s hw] // Cosmolestes / fulvus Horv.
[Horváth’s hw]’ (pinned through pronotum, left antenna, pedicel and flagellum of right antenna, distal part of right fore tarsus, left fore and both mid tarsi, left hind leg, and tibia and tarsus of right hind leg lacking) (Figs 8–11).
Topotypic material examined. 1 ♀ (NMPC), ‘Holub [p, pink label] // COLL.NICKERL / MUS.PRAGENSE [p, with p frame submarginally] // Cosmolestes / fulvus [hw] // ♀ [p] // topotype, not syntype / COSMO- LESTES / FULVUS / Horváth, 1893 / det. P. KMENT 2018 [p]’ (pinned through pronotum).
Current status. Valid species (MALDONADO CAPRILES 1990).
Distribution. Angola (VILLIERS 1950); Democratic Republic of the Congo (SCHOUTEDEN 1932, VILLIERS 1954a).
Remarks. The original description explicitly specified that it was based on a single female (‘[t]ibiae posticae in exemplo descripto cum tarsis desunt’ = hind tibiae of the described specimen lacking tarsi). Only the female deposited in the HNHM (Figs 8–11) matches this piece of information, therefore it is to be treated as the holotype of this species (ICZN 1999: Art. 73.1.2).
description: Published as part of Kment, Petr & Rédei, Dávid, 2018, A revision of the types of Heteroptera species described by Géza Horváth based on specimens from collections of Ladislav Duda and Emil Holub, pp. 275-295 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 58 (1) on pages 280-282, DOI: 10.2478/aemnp-2018-0025, http://zenodo.org/record/3699290
Edocla albipennis Horvath 1893
Creators: name: Kment, Petr
name: Rédei, Dávid
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2018
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hemiptera
Reduviidae
Edocla
Edocla albipennis

description: Edocla albipennis Horváth, 1893
(Figs 12–15)
Edocla albipennis Horváth, 1893: 264–265 (original description). Edocla albipennis: LETHIERRY & SEVERIN (1896): 102 (catalogue); JEAN- NEL (1919): 136, 199, 200 (key to species, species list); MALDONADO CAPRILES (1990): 397 (catalogue).
Type locality. ‘Africa centralis (HOLUB)’ [= Southern and southern-central Africa between cape Town and Kafue River, Zambia].
Type material examined. HOLOTYPE: (HNHM), ‘Holub [p, pink label] // albipennis [Horváth’s hw] / det. Horváth [p, “det.” corrected to “typ.” by hw of Horváth] // Edocla / albipennis Horv [Horváth’s hw]’ (pinned through pronotum, both antennae, fore and hind legs, tarsus of left middle, tibia and tarsus of right hind leg, and genital capsule lacking) (Figs 12–15).
Additional material examined. NAMIBIA: HARDAP PROVINCE: 20 km S Rehoboth, 1.400 m a.s.l., 23°29′S 17°07′E, 11.iii.2014, 1, A. Kudrna jr lgt., A. Carapezza det. (ACPI). KHOMAS PROVINCE: 10 km S Nauzerud, 1.660 m a.s.l., 23°52′49″S 16°21′55″E, 30.iii.2017, 1, J. Halada lgt., A. Carapezza det. (ACPI); 30 km SE Windhoek, 1.880 m a.s.l., 22°35′S 17°20′E, 11.iii.2014, 1, J. Halada lgt., A. Carapezza det. (ACPI). KUNENE PROVINCE: 50 km NEE Khorixas, 1.130 m a.s.l., 20°15′S 15°24′E, 25.iii.2014, 1, J. Halada lgt., A. Carapezza det. (ACPI). OMAHEKE PROVINCE: 35 km W Gobabis, 1.348 m a.s.l., 22°22′56″S 18°39′19″E, 7.iv.2017, 2, J. Halada lgt., A. Carapezza det. (1 ACPI, 1 NMPC).
Variability. In addition to the typical form in which the corium is characterized by a continuous longitudinal pale stripe, there is another colour form in which the longitudinal pale stripe of corium is centrally interrupted by a transverse black fascia. Also the colour of laterotergites IV–VI is highly variable, from almost completely pale to black in anterior two thirds. The body length varies from 11.9 to 14.0 mm (A. Carapezza, pers. comm.).
Current status. Valid species (MALDONADO CAPRILES 1990).
Distribution. ‘Central Africa’ (HORVÁTH 1893, MALDONADO CAPRILES 1990); Namibia (new record).
Remarks. The original description explicitly specified that the description of this species was based on a single strongly mutilated male (‘[e]xemplum unicum’ = unique specimen). This specimen (Figs 12–15) is deposited in the HNHM and it must be treated as the holotype of this species (ICZN 1999: Art. 73.1.2).
description: Published as part of Kment, Petr & Rédei, Dávid, 2018, A revision of the types of Heteroptera species described by Géza Horváth based on specimens from collections of Ladislav Duda and Emil Holub, pp. 275-295 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 58 (1) on page 282, DOI: 10.2478/aemnp-2018-0025, http://zenodo.org/record/3699290
Harpactor (Diphymus) dudae Horvath 1893
Creators: name: Kment, Petr
name: Rédei, Dávid
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2018
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hemiptera
Reduviidae
Harpactor
Harpactor dudae

description: Harpactor (Diphymus) dudae Horváth, 1893
(Figs 16–18)
Harpactor (Diphymus) dudae Horváth, 1893: 264 (original description). Harpactor Dudae: LETHIERRY & SEVERIN (1896): 159 (catalogue). Rhinocoris katangensis var. disparilis Schouteden, 1929a: 259 (descrip-
tion, distribution). Synonymized by SCHOUTEDEN (1932: 172). Rhinocoris Dudae: SCHOUTEDEN (1932): 172 (species list, new synonymy). Harpactor dudae: WU (1935): 468 (catalogue, distribution in China). Rhynocoris dudae: MALDONADO CAPRILES (1990): 278 (catalogue).
Type locality. ‘Territorium fluvii Gazellarum; communic.Dom. L.DUDA’ [= South Sudan: environs of Bahr el-Ghazal River, the main western tributary of the (White) Nile].
Type material examined. SYNTYPE: 1 (HNHM), ‘978 / 16. [hw, with p frame and p horizontal line across middle] // Gazellen- / fluss. [hw, yellow label] // Harpactor / Dudae Horv.[Horváth’s hw]’ (pinned through scutellum, flagella of both antennae, left hind tarsus and right hind leg lacking, right fore tibia broken subapically) (Figs 16–18).
Current status. Rhynocoris dudae (Horváth, 1893) (MAL- DONADO CAPRILES 1990).
Distribution. Democratic Republic of the Congo (SCHOU- TEDEN 1929a, as R. katangensis var. disparilis; 1932), South Sudan (HORVÁTH 1893). The distribution in China as listed by WU (1935) is certainly erroneous.
Remarks. This species was described based on an unspecified number of males; a single male syntype is found in the HNHM.
Rhinocoris katangensis Schouteden, 1929, and its var. disparilis Schouteden, 1929, were both described based on specimens from Elisabethville (now Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (SCHOUTEDEN 1929a). Rhinocoris katangensis var. disparilis was subsequently synonymized with Rh. dudae by SCHOUTEDEN (1932: 172). MALDONADO CAPRILES (1990: 278) apparently considered this act as an implicit synonymization of Rh. katangensis with Rh. dudae, and accordingly listed both Rh. katangensis and its var. disparilis as junior synonyms of Rh. dudae. This was, however, erroneous, because SCHOUTEDEN (1932: 174) explicitly listed Rh. katangensis as a valid specied different from Rh. dudae. The status of both Rh. katangensis and Rh. katangensis var. disparilis should be reconsidered based on their respective type materials. Rhynocoris katangensis must be treated as valid species.
description: Published as part of Kment, Petr & Rédei, Dávid, 2018, A revision of the types of Heteroptera species described by Géza Horváth based on specimens from collections of Ladislav Duda and Emil Holub, pp. 275-295 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 58 (1) on page 282, DOI: 10.2478/aemnp-2018-0025, http://zenodo.org/record/3699290
Supplementary material from Temperature-dependant benefits and costs of cytoplasmic male sterility in snail Physa acuta
Creators: name: BERERD, Sophie
name: David, Patrice
name: Teulier, Loic
name: Plénet, Sandrine
name: Luquet, Emilien
Publisher: name: The Royal Society
Year: 2024
Subjects: classificationCode: 310499
subject: Evolutionary biology not elsewhere classified

description: This section includes additional table and figures that provide further insights supporting the findings of our study. Table and figures are referenced in the main text to enhance the reader's understanding.
Oncocephalus angustatus Horvath 1893
Creators: name: Kment, Petr
name: Rédei, Dávid
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2018
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hemiptera
Reduviidae
Oncocephalus
Oncocephalus angustatus

description: Oncocephalus angustatus Horváth, 1893 (Figs 19–22)
Oncocephalus angustatus Horváth, 1893: 266–267 (original description). Oncocephalus angustatus: LETHIERRY & SEVERIN (1896): 86 (catalogue); MALDONADO CAPRILES (1990): 511 (catalogue).
Type locality. ‘ Congo; communic.Dom.L. DUDA’. The locality refers to the region of the Congo River, currently covering the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Republic of the Congo and the province of Cabinda, Angola. Type material examined. SYNTYPE: 1 ♀ (HNHM), ‘ Kongo.[p, gray label] // angustatus [Horváth’s hw] / det.Horváth [p, “det.” corrected to “typ.” by hw of Horváth] // Oncocephalus / angustatus Horv [Horváth’s hw]’ (pinned through scutellum, flagellum of left and distiflagellum of right antenna, tarsus of left middle, tibia and tarsus of right hind leg lacking) (Figs 19–22).
Current status. Valid species (MALDONADO CAPRILES 1990).
Distribution. ‘Congo’ (HORVÁTH 1893, MALDONADO CA- PRILES 1990). Exact locality unknown.
Remarks. HORVÁTH (1893) described the species based on an unspecified number of female(s); there is one female syntype in HNHM.
description: Published as part of Kment, Petr & Rédei, Dávid, 2018, A revision of the types of Heteroptera species described by Géza Horváth based on specimens from collections of Ladislav Duda and Emil Holub, pp. 275-295 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 58 (1) on page 282, DOI: 10.2478/aemnp-2018-0025, http://zenodo.org/record/3699290
Reduvius reuteri Horvath 1893
Creators: name: Kment, Petr
name: Rédei, Dávid
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2018
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hemiptera
Reduviidae
Reduvius
Reduvius reuteri

description: Reduvius reuteri Horváth, 1893
(Figs 23–26)
Reduvius reuteri Horváth, 1893:265 (original description).Junior homonym of Reduvius (Harpiscus) reuteri Distant, 1879: 125. Synonymized with Acanthaspis (now Neotrichedocla) quadrisignata Stål, 1855, by JEANNEL (1919: 209).
Reduvius reuteri: LETHIERRY & SEVERIN (1896): 100 (catalogue).
Reduvius Reuterianus Kirkaldy, 1909a: 388, new substitute name for Reduvius reuteri Horváth, 1893.
Type locality. ‘Africa centralis (HOLUB)’ [= Southern and southern-central Africa between Cape Town and Kafue River, Zambia].
Type material examined. SYNTYPE: 1 (HNHM), ‘Holub [p, pink label] // Reuteri Horv. [Horváth’s hw, underlined in red hw] / det. Horváth [p] // 4-signata [Horváth’s hw] / det. Horváth [p] // Edocla / quadrisignata Stål [Horváth’s hw]’ (pinned through scutellum, flagellum of left, distiflagellum of right antenna, left fore and hind legs, right middle leg, tarsi of left middle and right hind legs lacking) (Figs 23–26).
Current status. Junior subjective synonym of Neotrichedocla quadrisignata (Stål, 1855) (synonymized by JEANNEL 1919: 209, hereby confirmed).
Distribution of Neotrichedocla quadrisignata. Angola (HESSE 1925, as Trichedocla quadrisignata); Botswana (SCHUMACHER 1913, as Edocla quadrisignata; KRÜGER & DECKERT 2006); Cameroon (SCHOUTEDEN 1931, as Trichedocla quadrisignata); Democratic Republic of the Congo (SCHOUTEDEN 1931, as Edocla quadrisignata); Namibia (HESSE 1925, as Trichedocla quadrisignata; REAVELL 2000); South Africa (STÅL 1855, as Acanthaspis 4-signata, type locality in Natal; REAVELL 2000), Zimbabwe (MILLER 1953, as Trichedocla quadrisignata; REAVELL 2000).
Remarks. HORVÁTH (1893) described the species based on an unspecified number of males. A single male syntype (Figs 23–26) is deposited in the HNHM.
The confused nomenclatural history involving the names Acanthaspis dubius Walker, 1873, Acanthaspis dubia Reuter, 1881, Reduvius reuteri Horváth, 1893, Acanthaspis reuteri Letherry & Severin, 1896, Reduvius reuterianus Kirkaldy, 1909, Acanthaspis reuteri Schouteden, 1909, Acanthaspis reuterianus Schouteden, 1909, and Acanthaspis reuteriellus Schouteden, 1931 (see JEANNEL 1919, HESSE 1925, SCHOUTEDEN 1931, MALDONADO CAPRILES 1990), was correctly resolved by KERZHNER (1992: 53).
description: Published as part of Kment, Petr & Rédei, Dávid, 2018, A revision of the types of Heteroptera species described by Géza Horváth based on specimens from collections of Ladislav Duda and Emil Holub, pp. 275-295 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 58 (1) on page 283, DOI: 10.2478/aemnp-2018-0025, http://zenodo.org/record/3699290
Homoeocerus fuscicornis Horvath 1893
Creators: name: Kment, Petr
name: Rédei, Dávid
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2018
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hemiptera
Coreidae
Homoeocerus
Homoeocerus fuscicornis

description: Homoeocerus fuscicornis Horváth, 1893
(Figs 27–34)
Homoeocerus fuscicornis Horváth, 1893:259–260 (original description). Homoeocerus fuscicornis: LETHIERRY & SEVERIN (1894): 36 (catalogue); SCHOUTEDEN (1938): 258 (comparison with H. pallens, distribution), 263 (comparison with H. overlaeti).
Homoeocerus fuscicornis: VILLIERS (1973): 398 (distribution); LINNAVUORI (1978): 15 (figures of male genital capsule).
Type locality. ‘Africa centralis (HOLUB)’ [= Southern and southern-central Africa between Cape Town and Kafue River, Zambia].
Type material examined. SYNTYPE: 1 (HNHM), ‘978 / 14. [hw, with p frame and p horizontal line across middle] // Africa / (Holub) [Horváth’s hw] // Homoeocerus / fuscicornis Horv [Horváth’s hw]’ (pinned through scutellum, right pedicel and flagellum, right mid and both hind legs, tarsus of right fore leg, tarsal segment III of left mid leg lacking) (Figs 27–30). Topotypic material examined. 1 ♀ (HNHM), ‘Holub’ [p] (pinned through scutellum) (Figs 31–34); 1 (NMPC), ‘Holub [p] // COLL. NICKERL / MUS.PRAGENSE [p, with p frame submarginally] // [p] // Homoeocerus / fuscicornis / Horvath typ. Caffr. [hw with pencil]’ (pinned through right clavus); 1 (NMPC), ‘Holub [p, pink label] // 8. [hw, green label] // [p] // Homoeocerus / fuscicornis / Horv. n. sp. [hw with black ink]’ (pinned through right clavus); 1 (NMPC), ‘Holub [p, pink label] // [p]’ (pinned through pronotum); 1 ♀ (NMPC), ‘Holub [p, pink label] // ♀ [p]’ (pinned through scutellum).All four NMPC specimens bear the following label: ‘topotype, not syntype / HOMOEOCERUS / FUSCICORNIS / Horváth, 1893 / det. P. KMENT 2018’ [p].
Additional material examined. ANGOLA: ʻAfrica occ.port.,Angolaʼ, 1, O. V. Schneider lgt. (NMPC).
Current status. Valid species, Homoeocerus (Ornytoides) fuscicornis Horváth, 1893 (see WEBB et al. 2018).
Distribution. Angola (this paper), Democratic Republic of the Congo (SCHOUTEDEN 1938) and Republic of the Congo (VILLIERS 1973).
Remarks. This species was described based on an unspecified number of male(s) (HORVÁTH 1893). Only one male bearing Horváth’s handwritten locality and identification label, deposited in HNHM, is considered as syntype. One female deposited in the HNHM and three males and one female in the NMPC do not fit the original description and therefore they are considered as specimens without type status.
description: Published as part of Kment, Petr & Rédei, Dávid, 2018, A revision of the types of Heteroptera species described by Géza Horváth based on specimens from collections of Ladislav Duda and Emil Holub, pp. 275-295 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 58 (1) on page 283, DOI: 10.2478/aemnp-2018-0025, http://zenodo.org/record/3699290
Hypselonotus balteatus Horvath 1893
Creators: name: Kment, Petr
name: Rédei, Dávid
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2018
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hemiptera
Coreidae
Hypselonotus
Hypselonotus balteatus

description: Hypselonotus balteatus Horváth, 1893
(Figs 35–37)
Hypselonotus balteatus Horváth, 1893: 260 (original description). Hypselonotus balteatus: LETHIERRY & SEVERIN (1894): 82 (catalogue); WHITEHEAD (1974): 226–228 (variability,new synonymy, distribution); PACKAUSKAS (2010): 128 (catalogue, as synonym of H. interruptus).
Type locality. ‘Africa centralis (Holub)’ (in error).
Type material examined. SYNTYPE: 1 ♀ (HNHM), ‘Holub [p, pink label] // balteatus [Horváth’s hw, underlined in red hw] / det. Horváth [p] // Hypselonotus / balteatus Horv [Horváth’s hw]’ (pinned through scutellum, left antenna, tarsi of both fore and left mid leg, right mid and both hind legs lacking, apex of abdomen mutilated) (Figs 35–37).
Current status. Junior synonym of Hypselonotus interruptus Hahn, 1833 (see WHITEHEAD 1974).
Distribution of Hypselonotus interruptus. Central America: Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama; South America: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, Trinidad, Venezuela (WHITEHEAD 1974, PACKAUSKAS 2010).
Remarks. This species was described based on an unspecified number of female(s) (HORVÁTH 1893); a single female syntype is deposited in the HNHM.
description: Published as part of Kment, Petr & Rédei, Dávid, 2018, A revision of the types of Heteroptera species described by Géza Horváth based on specimens from collections of Ladislav Duda and Emil Holub, pp. 275-295 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 58 (1) on page 283, DOI: 10.2478/aemnp-2018-0025, http://zenodo.org/record/3699290
Niamia angulosa Horvath 1893
Creators: name: Kment, Petr
name: Rédei, Dávid
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2018
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hemiptera
Niamia
Niamia angulosa

description: Niamia angulosa Horváth, 1893
(Figs 38–40)
Niamia angulosa Horváth, 1893: 254 (original description).
Niamia angulosa: LETHIERRY & SEVERIN (1893): 261 (catalogue); KIRKAL- DY (1909b): 320 (catalogue).
Plataspis (Niamia) angulosa: HAGLUND (1894): 388–389 (new combination, distribution).
Libyaspis (Niamia) angulosa: SCHOUTEDEN (1909): 16, pl. I: Fig. 7 (variability, new combination).
Niamia angulosa: SCHOUTEDEN (1918): 19 (new combination, distribution); VILLIERS (1952b): 308 (distribution); JESSOP (1983): 35 (habitus drawing), 45–46 (generic diagnosis, distribution).
Type locality. ‘Niam-Niam; communic. Dom. L. DUDA’. The name Niam- Niam (or Nyam-Nyam) was frequently used by foreigners to refer to the Azande in the 18th and early 19th century.The Azande (plural of ‘Zande’ in the Zande language) are an ethnic group of North Central Africa.They live primarily in the northeastern part of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Orientale Province, specifically along the Uele River; Isiro, Dungu, Kisangani and Dorima), in south-central and southwestern part of South Sudan (Central and Western Equatoria States,Yei, Maridi,Yambio and Tombura), and in southeastern Central African Republic (the districts of Rafaï, Bangasu and Obo) (ANONYMUS 2017).
Type material examined. SYNTYPE: 1 ♀ (HNHM), ‘Africa / Niam-Niam) [hw, pink label] // angulosa [Horváth’s hw, underlined in red hw] / det. Horváth [p]’ (pinned through scutellum, intact, wings abducted) (Figs 38–40).
Current status. Valid species; type species of the genus Niamia Horváth, 1893, by monotypy (cf. HORVÁTH 1893, JESSOP 1983).
Distribution. Cameroon (HAGLUND 1894); Democratic Republic of the Congo (SCHOUTEDEN 1918); Guinea (VILLIERS 1952b); Nigeria (JESSOP 1983, no exact record); Republic of the Congo (JESSOP 1983, no exact record); Uganda (JESSOP 1983, no exact record).
Remarks. This species was described based on an unspecified number of female(s) (HORVÁTH 1893); a single female syntype is deposited in the HNHM.
description: Published as part of Kment, Petr & Rédei, Dávid, 2018, A revision of the types of Heteroptera species described by Géza Horváth based on specimens from collections of Ladislav Duda and Emil Holub, pp. 275-295 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 58 (1) on pages 283-285, DOI: 10.2478/aemnp-2018-0025, http://zenodo.org/record/3699290
Cantao africanus Horvath 1893
Creators: name: Kment, Petr
name: Rédei, Dávid
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2018
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hemiptera
Scutelleridae
Cantao
Cantao africanus

description: Cantao africanus Horváth, 1893
Cantao africanus Horváth, 1893: 256 (original description).
Cantao Africanus: LETHIERRY & SEVERIN (1893): 263 (catalogue).
Cantao africanus: SCHOUTEDEN (1903): 28 (repeated original description); SCHOUTEDEN (1906): 137 (comparison with C. pulcher sp. nov.); SCHOUTEDEN (1909): 31 (list); MCDONALD (1988):289 (nomen dubium, comment on possible mislabelling and synonymy); TSAI et al. (2011): 100 (nomen dubium).
Cantao (Cantao) africanus: SCHOUTEDEN (1904a):18 (catalogue, suspected mislabelling); KIRKALDY (1909b): 307 (catalogue).
Type locality. ‘ Congo, communic. Dom. L. DUDA.’ (in error?). The locality refers to the region of the Congo River, currently covering the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Republic of the Congo and the province of Cabinda, Angola.
Type material. SYNTYPE (S): Lost (SCHOUTEDEN 1903).
Current status. Nomen dubium (cf. TSAI et al. 2011).
Distribution. ‘Congo’ (HORVÁTH 1893) (in error?).
Remarks. This species was described based on an unspecified number of male(s) (HORVÁTH 1893). SCHOUTEDEN (1903: 28) claimed that the type material was lost. We also failed to locate any fitting specimen in either HNHM or NMPC.
Cantao Amyot & Serville, 1843, contains only four species other than C. africanus, three of them distributed in Indomalaya (extending to marginal areas of the Palaearctics), the fourth one in the Australian Region (TSAI et al. 2011). It is impossible to ascertain the identity of C. africanus from the original description. Since there are records of the common Indomalayan species C. ocellatus (Thunberg, 1784) from Africa, C. africanus is possibly a junior synonym of the latter species (cf. MCDONALD 1988). However, HORVÁTH (1893) explicitly mentioned that its genital capsule lacks the median process characteristic of C. ocellatus, therefore it is not possible to make a conclusive decision, and accordingly, in agreement with MCDONALD (1988), we consider it as a species of unknown identity. It is also possible that the type material was mislabelled and it did not originate from Africa.
description: Published as part of Kment, Petr & Rédei, Dávid, 2018, A revision of the types of Heteroptera species described by Géza Horváth based on specimens from collections of Ladislav Duda and Emil Holub, pp. 275-295 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 58 (1) on page 285, DOI: 10.2478/aemnp-2018-0025, http://zenodo.org/record/3699290
Stollia crucifera Horvath 1893
Creators: name: Kment, Petr
name: Rédei, Dávid
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2018
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Basidiomycota
Ustilaginomycetes
Ustilaginales
Ustilaginaceae
Stollia
Stollia crucifera

description: Stollia crucifera Horváth, 1893
(Figs 59–62)
Stollia crucifera Horváth, 1893: 257–258 (original description). Eysarcoris crucifer: LETHIERRY & SEVERIN (1893): 268 (catalogue, new combination); KIRKALDY (1909b):83 (catalogue); SCHOUTEDEN (1909):
52 (list).
Type locality. ‘Africa centralis (Holub)’ (in error).
Type material examined. HOLOTYPE: Lost.
NEOTYPE (here designated): ♀ (NMPC), ‘Holub [p, pink label] // COLL. NICKERL / MUS.PRAGENSE [p, with p frame submarginally] // Stollia / crucifera [hw // 8. [hw, green label] // ♀ [p] // NEOTYPUS / STOLLIA / CRUCIFERA / Horváth,1893 / des. KMENT & RÉDEI 2018’[p, red label] // COSMOPEPLA / CRUCIARIA / Stål, 1872 / det. P. KMENT 2016 [p]’ (pinned through scutellum, both antennae and all legs lacking).
Additional material examined. MADAGASCAR: 1 ♀, ‘ Coll. R. I. Sc. N.B. / Madagascar / Tamatave / Ex Museo / R. Oberthür’ [p, green label] (ISNB) [apparently mislabelled].
Current status. Junior subjective synonym of Cosmopepla cruciaria Stål, 1872 (see below).
Distribution of Cosmopepla cruciaria. Colombia (STÅL 1872, MCDONALD 1986), Ecuador (MCDONALD 1986, no exact record). The record from southern Brazil (Rio Grande do Sul) (PIRÁN 1970: 126) needs verification.
Remarks. The original description explicitly specified that the description of this species was based on a single female: ‘Antennae et pedes in exemplo descripto desunt.’ [= antennae and legs in described specimen missing]; that specimen must be treated as the holotype of this species (ICZN 1999: Art. 73.1.2). However, no such specimen could be located in HNHM. A single female (Figs 59–62) lacking antennae and legs, thus matching well the original description, but lacking labels with Horváth’s handwriting was found in NMPC. The species is potentially the holotype of S. crucifera, or at least it is apparently part of the lot of specimens from which the holotype originated. As its status as holotype is doubtful, we designate it here as the neotype of Stollia crucifera with the expressed purpose of fixing the identity of this species in accordance with Article 75.3 of the ICZN (1999). The neotype of Stollia crucifera can safely be identified as Cosmopepla cruciaria Stål, 1872 (redescribed and illustrated in detail by MCDONALD 1988), therefore the following new subjective synonymy is hereby proposed: Cosmopepla cruciaria Stål, 1872 = Stollia crucifera Horváth, 1893, syn. nov. As this species (together with all other Cosmopepla) is of New World distribution, the type locality of S. crucifera is evidently erroneous.
description: Published as part of Kment, Petr & Rédei, Dávid, 2018, A revision of the types of Heteroptera species described by Géza Horváth based on specimens from collections of Ladislav Duda and Emil Holub, pp. 275-295 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 58 (1) on pages 290-291, DOI: 10.2478/aemnp-2018-0025, http://zenodo.org/record/3699290
Supplementary Material from Exploring immune memory traits in the social immunity of a fungus-growing ant
Creators: name: Goes, Aryel C.
name: Kooij, Pepijn W.
name: Haifig, Ives
name: Bueno, Odair C.
name: Rodrigues, Andre
Publisher: name: The Royal Society
Year: 2024
Subjects: classificationCode: 310901
subject: Animal behaviour

description: Additional tables, figures, and separated analyses (of each cleaning behavior)
Paurotarsus insolitus * Rehn 1916
Creators: name: Itrac-Bruneau, Raphaëlle
name: Doucet, Guillaume
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2023
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Orthoptera
Tetrigidae
Paurotarsus
Paurotarsus insolitus

description: Paurotarsus insolitus* Rehn, 1916
(Fig. 15C)
Paurotarsus insolitus Rehn, 1916: 271. — Grant 1955: 6. — Silva et al. 2021: 16.
LOCALITÉ TYPE. — Brésil, Région du Nord, Rio Madeira, MadeiraMamoré Railroad Camp 43.
DISTRIBUTION. — Panama, Colombie, Trinité-et-Tobago, Guyana, Suriname, Pérou, Brésil (Silva et al. 2021; Kasalo et al. 2023a) et Guyane (nouveau pour le département).
MATÉRIEL EXAMINÉ. — Guyane • 1 ♂; Saint-Laurent-du-Maroni; piège lumineux; 15.VIII.1992; D. Morin leg.; coll. DM.
REMARQUE
Malgré l’impossibilité de mesurer le rapport de la longueur des tarses 1 et 3 des pattes postérieures (critère principal) en raison de l’absence de ces 2 dernières, l’identification a été possible grâce à l’observation des carènes faciales ainsi que de la forme des fémurs médians (Grant 1955).
description: Published as part of Itrac-Bruneau, Raphaëlle & Doucet, Guillaume, 2023, Apport des collections du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle et de Didier Morin à la connaissance des Batrachideinae et Lophotettiginae (Orthoptera, Tetrigidae) de Guyane, pp. 601-634 in Zoosystema 45 (20) on page 605, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2023v45a20, http://zenodo.org/record/10064321
Scaria hamata * (De Geer 1773
Creators: name: Itrac-Bruneau, Raphaëlle
name: Doucet, Guillaume
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2023
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Orthoptera
Tetrigidae
Scaria
Scaria hamata

description: Scaria hamata * (De Geer, 1773)
(Figs 10E, F; 15I)
Acrydium hamatum De Geer, 1773: 503.
Scaria hamata – Bolívar 1887: 301. — Cadena-Castañeda et al. 2019.
LOCALITÉ TYPE. — Brésil, Amazonas, Manaus (Campus de l’université fédérale d’Amazonas).
DISTRIBUTION. — Brésil, Pérou, Équateur, Bolivie (Cadena-Castañeda et al. 2019) et Guyane (nouveau pour le département).
MATÉRIEL EXAMINÉ. — Guyane • 1 ♀; Matoury, Cayene [sic]; 2.III.1976; M. Descamps leg.; MNHN • 1♀; [Roura], Montagne de Kaw; 10.VIII.1992; D. Morin leg.; coll. DM • 1♂; Sinnamary, Limite chantier Petit Saut; litière; 24.VIII.1992; D. Morin leg.; coll. DM • 1♂; Roura, Montagne aux chevaux, RN2, PK22, Carrière du Galion; 6.XII.2007; S. Brulé leg.; coll. DM • 1 ♂; Roura, Montagne aux chevaux, RN2, PK22, Carrière du Galion; piège à vitre; 20. VI.2009; SEAG leg.; coll. DM • 1♂; [Régina], Nouragues, Saut Pararé; 04°02’26.8 ” N, 52°40’35.2 ” W; piège à vitre; 20.IX.2009; SEAG leg.; coll. DM • 1 ♀; Roura, Montagne aux chevaux, RN2, PK22, Carrière du Galion; piège à vitre; 31.I.2010; SEAG leg.; coll. DM • 1 ♂; Roura, Montagne aux chevaux, RN2, PK22, Carrière du Galion; piège à vitre; 21.II.2010; SEAG leg.; coll. DM • 1 ♂; Roura, Montagne aux chevaux, RN2, PK22, Carrière du Galion; piège à vitre; 28.II.2010; SEAG leg.; coll. DM • 1 ♂, 2 ♀; Roura, Montagne aux chevaux, RN2, PK22, Carrière du Galion; piège à vitre; 28.XI.2010; SEAG leg.; coll. DM.
COMMENTAIRE. — L’espèce était notée par plusieurs auteurs en Guyane (Bolívar 1887; Hancock 1902; Bruner 1920). Cependant, la perte du type et les nombreuses erreurs d’identification liées à la courte description originale ont conduit à ne pas retenir ce taxon dans la première synthèse des Tetrigidae de Guyane (Itrac-Bruneau & Doucet 2022). Les spécimens collectés depuis 1976 viennent donc confirmer la présence de l’espèce dans le département.
description: Published as part of Itrac-Bruneau, Raphaëlle & Doucet, Guillaume, 2023, Apport des collections du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle et de Didier Morin à la connaissance des Batrachideinae et Lophotettiginae (Orthoptera, Tetrigidae) de Guyane, pp. 601-634 in Zoosystema 45 (20) on page 612, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2023v45a20, http://zenodo.org/record/10064321
Scaria producta * Hancock 1907
Creators: name: Itrac-Bruneau, Raphaëlle
name: Doucet, Guillaume
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2023
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Orthoptera
Tetrigidae
Scaria
Scaria producta

description: Scaria producta* Hancock, 1907
(Figs 10C, D; 15L)
Scaria producta Hancock 1907: 70. — Cadena-Castañeda et al. 2019.
LOCALITÉ TYPE. — Pérou, Pachitea.
DISTRIBUTION. — Colombie, Brésil, Pérou (Cadena-Castañeda et al. 2019) et Guyane (nouveau pour le département).
MATÉRIEL EXAMINÉ. — Guyane • 1♀; [Régina], Pied Saut Pararé; VIII.1977; M. Descamps leg.; MNHN • 1 ♀; [Régina], Pied Saut Pararé; 12.VIII.1977; M. Descamps leg.; MNHN • 3♀; [Régina], Pied Saut Pararé; IX.1977; M. Descamps leg.; MNHN • 1 ♀; [Régina], Arataye, affl. Approuages, aval du Saut Pararé; abattage de nuit, 4; 10.VII.1988; L. Desutter & P. Grandcolas leg.; MNHN • 1♂, 2♀; [Régina], Arataye, affl. Approuages, aval du Saut Pararé; abattage de jour, arbre n°5; 11.VII.1988; L. Desutter & P. Grandcolas leg.; MNHN • 1 ♀; [Régina], Arataye, affl. Approuages, aval du Saut Pararé; abattage de jour, arbre n°17; 19.VII.1988; L. Desutter & P. Grandcolas leg.; MNHN.
description: Published as part of Itrac-Bruneau, Raphaëlle & Doucet, Guillaume, 2023, Apport des collections du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle et de Didier Morin à la connaissance des Batrachideinae et Lophotettiginae (Orthoptera, Tetrigidae) de Guyane, pp. 601-634 in Zoosystema 45 (20) on page 622, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2023v45a20, http://zenodo.org/record/10064321
Tettigidea claudei Itrac-Bruneau & Doucet 2022
Creators: name: Itrac-Bruneau, Raphaëlle
name: Doucet, Guillaume
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2023
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Orthoptera
Tetrigidae
Tettigidea
Tettigidea claudei

description: Tettigidea claudei Itrac-Bruneau & Doucet, 2022
(Fig. 15M)
Tettigidea claudei Itrac-Bruneau & Doucet, 2022: 408.
LOCALITÉ TYPE. — Guyane, Kourou.
DISTRIBUTION. — Guyane (Itrac-Bruneau & Doucet 2022).
MATÉRIEL EXAMINÉ. — Guyane • 2♂; Cayenne; collection Brünner, collection A. Finot 1908; MNHN-EO-CAELIF11295, MNHN-EO-CAELIF11296 • 1 ♂; Cayenne; collection A. Finot 1908; MNHN-EO-CAELIF11297 • 1 ♀; [Saint-Laurent-du-Maroni], Nouveau Chantier; janvier; collection Le Moult, collection Lucien Chopard 1914; MNHN-EO-CAELIF11298 • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; [Kourou], Gourdonville; octobre; R. Benoist 1914; MNHN-EO-CAELIF11299, MNHN-EO-CAELIF11300 • 2 ♂, 1 ♀; Régina, Approuague; 18.IV.1976; M. Descamps leg.; MNHN-EO-CAELIF11301, MNHN-EO-CAELIF11302, MNHN-EO-CAELIF11303.
description: Published as part of Itrac-Bruneau, Raphaëlle & Doucet, Guillaume, 2023, Apport des collections du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle et de Didier Morin à la connaissance des Batrachideinae et Lophotettiginae (Orthoptera, Tetrigidae) de Guyane, pp. 601-634 in Zoosystema 45 (20) on page 622, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2023v45a20, http://zenodo.org/record/10064321
Lophotettix Hancock 1909
Creators: name: Itrac-Bruneau, Raphaëlle
name: Doucet, Guillaume
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2023
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Orthoptera
Tetrigidae
Lophotettix

description: Genre Lophotettix Hancock, 1909
REMARQUE
Dalens et al. (2011) avaient identifié plusieurs Lophotettix provenant de la Réserve naturelle des Nouragues (Saut Pararé) comme appartenant à Lophotettix unicristatus Hancock, 1909. Cette information avait été reprise dans la première synthèse des Tetrigidae de Guyane (Itrac-Bruneau & Doucet 2022). Cependant, un nouvel examen des spécimens, notamment à l’aune de la publication de Kasalo et al. (2022), nous conduit à retirer L. unicristatus de la liste des espèces connues du département.
description: Published as part of Itrac-Bruneau, Raphaëlle & Doucet, Guillaume, 2023, Apport des collections du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle et de Didier Morin à la connaissance des Batrachideinae et Lophotettiginae (Orthoptera, Tetrigidae) de Guyane, pp. 601-634 in Zoosystema 45 (20) on page 624, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2023v45a20, http://zenodo.org/record/10064321
Lophotettix hancocki * (Bruner 1910
Creators: name: Itrac-Bruneau, Raphaëlle
name: Doucet, Guillaume
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2023
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Orthoptera
Tetrigidae
Lophotettix
Lophotettix hancocki

description: Lophotettix hancocki* (Bruner, 1910)
(Figs 12 B-D; 15B)
Gladiotettix hancocki Bruner, 1910: 102. — Liebermann 1955: 332. — Grant 1957: 38.
Phelene hancocki – Steinmann 1969: 384.
Lophotettix hancocki – Hancock 1914: 328. — Silva et al. 2019b: 352. — Kasalo et al. 2022: 230.
LOCALITÉ TYPE. — Brésil, Pará.
DISTRIBUTION. — Brésil, Équateur (Kasalo et al. 2022) et Guyane (nouveau pour le département).
MATÉRIEL EXAMINÉ. — Guyane • 1 ♀; [Régina], Nouragues, Saut Pararé; 04°02’26.8”N, 52°40’35.2”W; piège à vitre; 11.VIII.2009; SEAG leg.; coll. DM • 1 ♂; [Régina], Nouragues, Saut Pararé; 04°02’26.8”N, 52°40’35.2”W; piège cryldé; 12.VIII.2009; SEAG leg.; coll. DM • 1 ind; [Régina], Nouragues, Saut Pararé; 04°02’26.8”N, 52°40’35.2”W; piège à vitre; 28.I.2010; SEAG leg.; coll. DM.
description: Published as part of Itrac-Bruneau, Raphaëlle & Doucet, Guillaume, 2023, Apport des collections du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle et de Didier Morin à la connaissance des Batrachideinae et Lophotettiginae (Orthoptera, Tetrigidae) de Guyane, pp. 601-634 in Zoosystema 45 (20) on page 624, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2023v45a20, http://zenodo.org/record/10064321
MASOFAVIY TA'LIM VA UNI TASHKIL ETISH ASOSLARI
Creators: name: Umarov, Bekzod
name: Ahmedova, Hayotxon
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2024

description: Ushbu maqolada Masofaviy ta’lim va uni tashkil etish asoslari haqida aytib o‘tilgan. Masofaviy ta’lim jarayonlari haqida batafsil to‘xtalib o‘tilgan. Bundan tashqari masofaviy ta’lim va uni tashkil etish asoslari haqida xulosa bilan yakunlangan.