Oligocladus voightae Quiroga, Bolaños & Litvaitis, 2006, n. sp.
Creators: name: Quiroga, Sigmer Y.
name: Bolaños, D. Marcela
name: Litvaitis, Marian K.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2006
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Platyhelminthes
Polycladida
Euryleptidae
Oligocladus
Oligocladus voightae

description: Species: voightae n. sp. (Figs. 6–10)
Type material and locality:
a) Holotype, whole mount, one mature specimen (12 mm x 10 mm), FMNH 12560, collected 30 August, 2004 from Escanaba Trough, 20 m N of Marker 6X on Central Hill, from 3232 m depth (41° 00.272’N 127° 29.679’W).
b) Paratype, one mature specimen as serial sagittal sections (11 mm x 9 mm), FMNH 12464, collected with holotype 30 August, 2004 from Escanaba Trough, 20 m N of Marker 6X on Central Hill, from 3232 m (depth 41° 00.272’N 127° 29.679’W).
Distribution: To date, found only at type locality
Etymology: Species named in honor of Dr. Janet Voight of the Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois.
Diagnosis: Mouth anterior to the brain. Eyes, few and minute, scattered on the tentacles. Seminal vesicle connected posteriorly to an auxiliary storage vesicle containing a basophilic substance (possibly sperm). Auxilliary storage vesicle extends dorsally over the seminal vesicle. Posterior anal pore in main median branch of the intestine.
Description
External features:
Color — preserved animals have a milky white dorsal surface with ovaries appearing as dark brown spots that form a radial pattern. White intestinal branches are visible through the epidermis. The ventral surface is white.
Form — oval body shape, margins without folds except for the ones forming the tentacles. The two specimens measured 12mm x 10 mm and 11 mm x 9 mm, respectively. A very conspicuous sucker is located right in the center of the ventral surface, posterior to the pharynx (Figs. 9 and 10).
Tentacles — Short (~600 µm), blunt, marginal tentacles formed mainly by the elongation of the body margin rather than the folding of it (Fig. 6).
Eyes — Few and minute, scattered over the tentacles. Cerebral and marginal eyes absent.
Digestive system — the mouth is a small opening, anterior to the brain (Fig. 8 A). The very muscular and cylindrical pharynx is directed forward and located in the anterior half of the worm, just anterior to the sucker. It folds back on itself in an S­shape, possibly due to a preservation artifact (Figs. 8 A and 10). The pharynx connects to a median intestinal branch which itself extents anteriorly dorsal to the brain, and posteriorly almost to the body margin. The posterior part of the median intestinal branch divides into 6 to 8 large, radial branches and 4 smaller ones just dorsal to the pharynx (Fig. 7). An anal pore is present on the medial intestinal branch just prior to the terminal end of the branch itself (Fig. 7). An anterior vesicle opening to the exterior was observed, but there is no evidence of it being connected or related to the digestive system.
Reproductive anatomy:
Gonopores — pores are well separated from each other. The female pore is posterior to the male pore and located well anterior of the sucker.
Male copulatory apparatus — testes are scattered ventrally all over the body but are especially concentrated in the posterior end. The male apparatus is rather small compared to the size of the animal. A free prostatic vesicle (125 µm) is located just dorsal to the male atrium (Fig. 8). The seminal vesicle is larger than the prostatic vesicle (175µm), and is located posterior to the atrium. In addition, the seminal vesicle is connected to an accessory storage vesicle containing a basophilic substance, possibly sperm (Figs. 8 and 10). This accessory vesicle wraps itself dorsally around the seminal vesicle. A deep atrium houses a pointed stylet (175µm).
Female copulatory apparatus — The ovaries are dorsal and scattered over the entire body, fanning out in a radial pattern from the pharynx (Fig. 6 A). Two small uterine trunks are present behind the pharynx. Numerous uterine vesicles are present (Figs. 6 A and 9). The female atrium is not very deep and connected to a simple vagina, which in turn connects to oviducts.
Taxonomic remarks:
Both, Faubel (1984a) and Prudhoe (1985) are in agreement of the genus Oligocladus in the Euryleptidae. Therefore, either classification system may be used for its identification. Conspicuous characters such as a digestive system with a median main intestinal branch, a plicate, cylindrical pharynx extending anteriorly to the level of the brain, a male copulatory complex located anterior to the female one, and a true free prostatic vesicle, clearly place this species in the family Euryleptidae. Among the Euryleptidae, three genera share the possession of an anal pore in the main intestinal branch, Oligocladus, Cycloporus, and Leptoteredra. However, only Oligocladus and Cycloporus also possess a pair of uterine trunks with multiple uterine vesicles (Faubel 1984).
Oligocladus and Cycloporus are distinguished by the presence of many peripheral vesicles opening to the exterior. In Cycloporus these vesicles have clear connections to the digestive system; in Oligocladus they do not. In one examined specimen, a vesicular channel system opening via several pores to the exterior was observed in the anterior portion, albeit only on one side of the worm. However, the relationship of this channel system to the digestive system is uncertain. In addition, an obvious anal pore opening dorsally from the caudal end of the main intestinal branch confirmed a placement into Oligocladus rather than Cycloporus.
Additionally, Hadenfeldt (1929) recognizes the position of the brain posterior to the mouth as unique to the genus Oligocladus, with only two species. According to Faubel (1984), the anatomy of O. auritus is not very well known, although Lang (1884) placed it into this genus because its brain is posterior to the mouth. Thus, the position of the brain of O. voightae supports the placement of this species in the genus Oligocladus. Furthermore, the general anatomy of O. voightae corresponds well with that of O. sanginolentus with the exception of the presence of two sharply­defined clusters of cerebral eyes and an anteriorly trifurcated intestinal trunk in the latter species (Prudhoe, 1985).
Ecological remarks:
It is interesting to note that the two newly described species so far have been collected only from deep­sea wood deployments heavily colonized by wood­boring clams (species of which are currently being described, Dr. J. Voight, Chicago Field Museum, pers. comm.). Previously, Turner (1978) demonstrated the importance of deep­sea wood deployments in the establishment of a highly diverse community, consisting of woodboring bivalves, predatory polychaetes and gastropods, galatheid crabs, echinoderms and most likely fish. With respect to flatworms, Turner (1978) reports a single specimen of a predatory turbellarian only; the most abundant taxa of her study being gastropods and polychaetes.
This contrasts sharply with polyclad densities found at Escanaba Trough and ODP. In August 2004, 149 specimens were collected from four 18 inch x 4 inch x 4 inch pieces of lumber at Escanaba Trough that had been deployed there in July 2002, and in July 2003, 47 specimens were collected from ODP 1026B and 33 specimens from near Baby Bare Seamount off identical deployments made in September 2002 (Dr. J. Voight, pers. comm.).
The ecological function of the two newly described species may be inferred from known predatory behavior of other polyclads. Acotyleans of the families Leptoplanidae and Stylochidae are known to prey on rock and pearl oysters (Newman et al. 1993, O'Connor & Newman 2001), blue mussels (Galleni et al. 1980, Villalba et al. 1997), barnacles (Murina et al. 1995), and cultured giant clams (Newman et al. 1993). Their impact can be substantial, as they often feed exclusively on spat or juvenile bivalves, resulting in as much as 90% mortality (Newman et al. 1993). Predation by a stylochid polyclad on oysters has been reported also for the US Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico coasts (Provenzano 1961, Webster & Medford 1961, Christensen 1973, Chintala et al. 1993), and Newell et al. (2000) were able to show that small (<5 mm 2) polyclads were instrumental in significantly reducing the numbers of young oyster spat (less than 3 weeks postsettlement) in Chesapeake Bay.
Recently, Ritson­Williams et al. (2006) described the predatory behavior of a planocerid, concluding that this flatworm uses tetrodotoxin to capture and kill its mollusk prey. From the observed ecological association of Anocellidus profundus and Oligocladus voightae with deep­sea bivalves, it is tempting to speculate that the flatworms may use a toxin such as tetrodotoxin to subdue their prey. At this point, however, such predator­prey interactions, and the presence of toxins in deep­sea flatworms remain to be demonstrated.
description: Published as part of Quiroga, Sigmer Y., Bolaños, D. Marcela & Litvaitis, Marian K., 2006, First description of deep­sea polyclad flatworms from the North Pacific: Anocellidus n. gen. profundus n. sp. (Anocellidae, n. fam.) and Oligocladus voightae n. sp. (Euryleptidae), pp. 1-19 in Zootaxa 1317 on pages 12-17, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1317.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/173981