Arthropleura Jordan, 1854
Creators: name: Davies, Neil S.
name: Garwood, Russell J.
name: McMahon, William J.
name: Schneider, Joerg W.
name: Shillito, Anthony P.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Arthropleuridea
Arthropleurida
Arthropleuridae
Arthropleura

description: Genus <i>Arthropleura</i> Jordan in Jordan and von Meyer, 1854 Type species <i>Arthropleura armata</i> Jordan, 1854, plates 13–15, plate 2, figs 4–5 in Jordan and von Meyer, 1854, <i>Arthropleura</i> sp. Jordan in Jordan and von Meyer, 1854 (Figs 1 and 2) <i>Material</i>: CAMSM X.50355, partial remains comprising articulated anterior 12–14 tergites in two slabs. <i>Locality</i>: Howick Bay (55° 27′ 19.2″ N, 01° 35′ 32.4″ W), Northumberland, England. <i>Age and formation</i>: Early Serpukhovian, Stainmore Formation (Yoredale Group). <i>Description</i>: specimen identified as the partial anterior dorsal exoskeleton of <i>Arthropleura</i> because of the trilobate tergites, coupled with the large dimensions. Remains consist of 12–14 tergites and paratergites, 76 cm in maximum length from the anterior to posterior, and 36 cm at the greatest width. Preserved as a three-dimensional cuticular infill by sand, with limited cuticular material. Ornamentation limited: some longitudinal striae are visible on the paratergites and there is a granular or verrucose texture on the anterior margins of the medial tergites. The specimen has an irregular morphology as a result of the taphonomy of a large three-dimensional exoskeleton interred within sand in a tectonically active setting. Description of the specimen The three-dimensional preservation of this large fossil is summarized in Figure 7. The fossil is visible on a fracture surface within a block of cross-bedded fine-grained sandstone. The fracture splitting the well-indurated host lithology is recent and presumably formed when the host block fell from the cliff. The fossil is preserved on surfaces either side of this fracture. As the fracture may run through the middle of the three-dimensional fossil (see later discussion), it is inappropriate to refer to these as part and counterpart (Fig. 1) and they are here referred to as slab Aand slab B. Slab Ais the lower stratum and hosts the bulk of the fossil. Slab Bis the upper stratum and preserves an impression that domes downward to a relief of <i>c</i>. 10 cm, creating a three-dimensional semi-cylindrical form. The fossil consists of 12–14 sub-rectangular medial tergites, flanked on one side by right paratergites. The left paratergites are missing and the medial tergites terminate against a serrated edge. The right paratergites have frayed and irregular lateral margins and so are also imperfectly preserved (Figs 2 and 8). The anterior five to six paratergites are increasingly recurved (Figs 1 and 2). Slab A broke into several pieces during extraction from the host block; these fragments reveal the three-dimensional form of the tergites. Each is filled with the host sediment, forming threedimensional imbricated pillows. The tergite sand infills are 4 mm thick in the medial tergites, thinning to 1 mm or less towards the paratergites (Fig. 9). The fossil is underlain in slab A, and overlain in slab B, by a carbonaceous smear that exactly mirrors the form of the frayed right paratergites (Fig. 10). The offset between recognizable frayed paratergites and their displaced form in smears can be measured. The offset is consistent along the length of the fossil at 40 cm. Excluding the smear repetition, the total length of the fossil is 76 cm and its maximum preserved width from the right lateral paratergite to the termination of the left medial tergite is 36 cm. In addition to this smear, remnants of carbonaceous material can be seen in patches on both slabs, most notably in the tergal margins in slab A (Fig. 9), where the arthrodial membrane would have been present in life. The dorsal side of the tergites in slab Acan be seen, in broken fragments, to be carbon-rich and flecked with abundant mica, which possibly adhered to a sticky surface prior to burial (Fig. 8). The majority of the fossil, however, has no organic material and its form is revealed by impression, or sand infill, alone. As a result of the lack of well-preserved cuticle and the granular nature of the host sediment, ornamentation is not consistently visible on the specimen. However, the anterior margins of the medial tergites, where the segments would have been joined by a softer arthrodial membrane, have a rough, grainy appearance on the surfaces of both slabs. The absence of this texture across the remainder of the fossil and host sediment implies either that it is an original texture or that it is a taphonomic difference reflecting the contrasting nature of the exoskeleton between these regions (Fig. 8). In addition, striae can be seen on some of the paratergites, some of which appear to form pronounced medial grooves that are parallel to the central axis of a paratergite (Fig. 8). This information can be combined to describe a stratigraphic transect downwards through the fossil as follows: (1) 10 cm of domed fine-grained sand (slab B); (2) a negligible thickness, offset carbonaceous smear (slab B); (3) an impression fossil of tergites/ paratergites, with grainy and striated surface textures (slab B); (4) remnant patches of organic material and the original form of the tergites, recording verrucose and striated surface textures (slab A); (5) 1–4 mm thickness of sand infill within three-dimensional tergites (slab A); (6) a highly micaceous and carbonaceous veneer on the surface of the tergites (slab A); (7) a negligible thickness, offset carbonaceous smear (slab A); and (8) underlying fine-grained sand (slab A). Taphonomy of the specimen The granular sandy host lithology of the specimen is remarkably coarse for preserved arthropleurid remains. All the other articulated remains are known from very fine-grained mudrocks, sandy siltstones or crystal tuffs (Guthörl 1934, 1935; Hahn <i>et al.</i> 1986; Schneider and Barthel 1997; Schneider <i>et al.</i> 2010), although several isolated remains from the late Visean Hainichen basin in Saxony are well preserved in silty fine-grained sandstones to fine- to medium-grained sandstones (Röβler and Schneider 1997). The wellsorted, granular nature of the host sediment created taphonomic conditions that were not conduciveto preserving chitinous cuticles in high fidelity (Briggs <i>et al.</i> 1998) and the fossil is identifiable primarily because the cuticle was filled with sediment post-mortem. The only evidence of the original organic material is some carbonized material between the tergites in slab A (Fig. 9a) and the carbonaceous and micaceous material that appears offset and smeared across both the ventral and dorsal extremes of the fossil. <i>Missing body parts</i> The Howick specimen preserves only part of the dorsal exoskeleton of the organism, with no evidence of appendages. As is common to all other reports of giant <i>Arthropleura</i>, the head is also missing, but the lack of segmentation anterior to the first sizeable tergite suggests that the fossil may terminate where the head capsule was during life (Fig. 2). No trace of appendage attachment points is present on either side of the specimen preserved in slab A, where both the ventral and dorsal surfaces of the dorsal exoskeleton can be observed. The most plausible explanation for these characteristics is that the specimen is an exuvium, potentially one in which the suture was located between the ventral edge of the paratergite and the body. This scenario would have resulted in a hollow mass of cuticle representing the dorsal and lateral exoskeleton, which was open to sediment infilling during an interval after moulting, but prior to ultimate internment in the sediment pile. Despite missing key body parts, the remains are not fully disarticulated, which is unexpected given the sedimentological evidence for relatively high-energy deposition because arthropod exoskeletons rapidly disarticulate when tumbled in a fluid (McCoy and Brandt 2009). Considered alongside the fact that the fossil is preserved in three dimensions, fully enveloped and partially coiled (longitudinal doming of the sediment in part B) within a finegrained cross-bedded sandstone, this suggests that the remains were instantaneously deposited with the host sediment. In a scenario where the fossil was parautochthonous, with the exuvium discarded and filled with sand away from the final resting location, this could feasibly have occurred as a pulse of bank margin debris (i.e. sand, exuvium and plant remains) that collapsed into a river channel and was subsequently sculpted by migrating bedforms. Two further characteristics imply that the fossil represents an articulated exuvium that had already degraded prior to such collapse and interment: (1) the absence of any other fragments of arthropleurid material within the host bed (despite intensive searching), which implies that a complete organism was not disarticulated within the bedform in which it was ultimately preserved; and (2) the degradation recorded by the serrated leftlateral margin to the tergites and the irregular broken appearance of the majority of the right paratergites (Figs 1 and 2). <i>Post-burial deformation</i> Two key characteristics of the fossil imply that it has been deformed post-burial. First, the sand-filled tergites in slab Acan be seen to buckle, suggesting that they experienced compressional stress within the sediment pile. Second, the repetition of form between the carbonaceous smears that sandwich the fossil and the sand infill implies that the internal cast has been squeezed out and offset from the dorsal and ventral cuticles after partial lithification. Both characteristics are unusual, but can be readily explained through the tectonic taphonomy of the host bed. The fossil-bearing bed occurs within the hanging wall damage zone of the Howick Fault (Fig. 4) and has previously been imaged, when still <i>in situ</i> in the cliff face, in earlier structural geology investigations of the locality (see De Paola <i>et al.</i> 2005, their fig. 8; Kjemperud 2011, their figs 14 and 17). The Stainmore Formation in the hanging wall damage zone contains several features – including small thrust faults, listric geometries, stratal thickening in the hanging wall, mudstone deformation and calcite veins – that together show that the master fault was syndepositional and occurred when the sediment was only partially lithified (De Paola <i>et al.</i> 2005; Kjemperud 2011). Normal faulting in the Howick Fault Zone was initiated during thermal subsidence after the earliest Carboniferous cessation of rifting in the Northumberland Basin and was contemporaneous with the deposition of the Yoredale Group (Kimbell <i>et al.</i> 1989; De Paola <i>et al.</i> 2005; Kjemperud 2011). Development continued when it was reactivated as a strike-slip fault during Variscan-induced shortening (Leeder <i>et al.</i> 1989; Chadwick <i>et al.</i> 1995; Fraser and Gawthorpe 2003; De Paola <i>et al.</i> 2005), as well as during the Carboniferous–Permian emplacement of the adjacent Whin Sill dolerite (De Paola <i>et al.</i> 2005; Kjemperud 2011). Fault development at the precise fossil locality thus involved the near-continual deformation of the host sediment, prior to full lithification, throughout the Carboniferous and into the Permian. To accommodate the stress in the synsedimentary main fault, internal compressional strain in the fossil-hosting bed would have occurred. The arthropleurid fossil – as a significantly large material discontinuity within the unlithified to partly lithified sandstone bed – likely took up some of this strain, buckling the tergites and offsetting the internal sand moulds from the carbonized remains of the exuvium. Interpretation of Arthropleurid identity The partial preservation of cuticular material, the segmented nature of this fossil and the partial preservation of the lateral divisions of the segments into medial and paratergites strongly supports an arthropod identity for this fossil, even though no appendage is preserved. The morphology of the best-preserved paratergites (i.e. four to six; Fig. 2) indicates that the fossil records the anterior part of the animal. The surface of slab Ais interpreted as recording the ventral surface of the dorsal exoskeleton, with the surface of slab B recording a three-dimensional counter-print of this, and the pillow forms in slab Abeing sand infills of the tergites. The dorsal surface of the dorsal exoskeleton is visible in some fragments that have broken off from slab A (Fig. 8c). No other Carboniferous arthropod with this morphology, or of this size, is known. Therefore, based on these observations, we propose that this fossil represents a giant arthropleurid. Although it is possible that other – yet unreported – arthropod taxa reached this size during the Carboniferous, an identity as <i>Arthropleura</i> sp. remains the most parsimonious explanation. In addition, two characteristics of the specimen bear notable resemblances to other specimens of <i>Arthropleura</i>: (1) the recurvature of the anterior paratergites is similar to that seen in other specimens (Hahn <i>et al.</i> 1986; Briggs and Almond 1994; Brauckmann <i>et al.</i> 1997; Kraus and Brauckmann 2003; Schneider and Werneburg 2010); and (2) the granular surface texture on the anterior border of the tergites bears a resemblance to that visible in partial specimens (Brauckmann <i>et al.</i> 1997). Five morphospecies of <i>Arthropleura</i> have previously been described, mainly based on cuticular ornamentation: <i>A. armata</i> and <i>A. mammata</i> are in common use (e.g. see Hahn <i>et al.</i> 1986) and there are less frequent or isolated reports of <i>A. cristata</i> (Hannibal 1997), <i>A. fayoli</i> (Boule 1893) and <i>A. maillieuxi</i> (Pruvost 1930). Comparable large arthropleurids have been assigned to the species <i>A. armata</i>, but the lack of preserved appendages or detailed ornamentation in the Howick specimen precludes confident species-level diagnosis. <i>Original size</i> Assuming that the missing left paratergites were the same size as those preserved on the right, the original carcass must have been at least 55 cm in width and considerably more than the 76 cm length that is preserved. A number of alternative width to length ratios for <i>Arthropleura</i> have been posited, calculated on the basis of trackways and partial giant, or complete juvenile, specimens with appendages. Estimates range between 3.47 (Martino and Greb 2009), 3.75 (Ryan 1986), 3.6–4.4 (Kraus 1993; Schneider and Werneburg 1998; Schneider <i>et al.</i> 2010) and 4.78 (Hahn <i>et al.</i> 1986). The Howick specimen is the widest arthropleurid fossil thus far discovered. Based on these ratios, it would also represent the largest individual discovered to date – being between 190 and 263 cm in length (Fig. 11). We contend that the true size is most likely to have been at the upper end of these estimates because the fossil has been tectonically compressed and only 12–14 tergites are preserved. Estimates of the number of tergites in <i>Arthropleura</i> have improved with the discovery of new specimens, but all estimates are considerably greater than the 12–14 in the specimen described here. Early morphological details were based on the description of a <i>c.</i> 6.5 cm long, nearly complete, juvenile specimen (Calman 1914) from below the Top Hard Coal in Derbyshire, England (late Bashkirian; Duckmantian; Sheppard 2005). That specimen has an indistinct head region, a nearly complete trunk in dorsal aspect and an indistinct terminal segment, permitting the recognition that <i>Arthropleura</i> had at least 28 tergites (Calman 1914). Several subsequent reconstructions (e.g. Rolfe and Ingham 1967, fig. 2; Briggs <i>et al.</i> 1984) were strongly influenced by the <i>c.</i> 90 cm long ‘Maybach specimen’ from the Moscovian Saarbrücker Schichten (Sulzbach Formation, Saarbrücken Subgroup) of the Saar Basin, Germany (Guthörl 1935; first described and figured in detail by Hahn <i>et al.</i> 1986, fig. 1 and plates 1 and 2). That specimen shows 23 tergites from a dorsal aspect, but the head and tail regions are missing (Hahn <i>et al.</i> 1986, plate 2). Hahn <i>et al.</i> (1986, fig. 2) suggested these represent the remains from a trunk of an estimated 30 tergites. Other discoveries that inform on <i>Arthropleura</i> segment numbers include two associated remains of a distorted ventral exoskeleton from the Gzhelian–Asselian Döhlen Formation of Saxony, which preserve 25 articulated leg-bearing segments of an individual between 0.65 and 0.8 m in length (Schneider and Barthel 1997, p. 195, plates 5–7). The most recent reconstructions of <i>Arthropleura</i> – a 2.20 m long three-dimensional reconstruction, figured by Schneider and Werneburg (2010, fig. 6C) – assume 32 tergites for adult giant arthropleurids. All of these reconstructions imply that the Howick specimen comprises less than half the length of the original organism. The Howick specimen isthus analogous in size to the very largest <i>Arthropleura</i> previously interpreted from indirect evidence: the 51 cm wide organism interpreted from fragmentary preserved appendages in the Gzhelian–Asselian Manebach Formation, Germany (Schneider and Werneburg 1998) and the organisms that left nearly 50 cm wide trackways in the Visean Strathclyde Group of Scotland (Pearson 1992; Pearson and Gooday 2019) and the Gzhelian Cape John Formation of Nova Scotia (Ryan 1986; Ryan and Boehner 1994). Weights of 8–10 kg have previously been calculated for giant <i>Arthropleura</i>, estimated from interpretations of a fraction of a simplified cylindrical volume and a density equivalent to that of water (Kraus and Brauckmann 2003). However, a cylinder is not representative of the true form of <i>Arthropleura</i>, which is better envisaged as a hemi-ellipsoid with a flat underside and raised topside tapering towards the lateral, anterior and posterior edges. In addition, the density of water (997 kg m <i>−</i> 3 ) is not representative of the densities of modern giant millipedes, which are typically 350– 550 kg m <i>−</i> 3 (Bercovitz and Warburg 1985; Mwabvu <i>et al.</i> 2010; Horváthová <i>et al.</i> 2021). We calculated two possible estimates for the weight of the Howick <i>Arthropleura</i> based on a reasonable estimate of 20 cm as the height and consequent dimensions of 20 cm × 55 cm × 263 cm. Calculating this volume as a hemi-ellipsoid (volume = 2/3π <i>abc</i>, where <i>a</i>, <i>b</i> and <i>c</i> are the half-height, width and length) equates to <i>c.</i> 158000 cm 3, suggesting substantial weights of <i>c.</i> 55–87 kg based on the densities of extant giant millipedes. This method provides a replicable estimate, but does not account for the true shape of the organism being a fraction of a complete hemi-ellipsoid. To account for the likely overestimate, we also purchased a commercially available three-dimensional mesh of a model <i>Arthropleura</i> from Turbosquid.com, loaded this into Blender (Garwood and Dunlop 2014) and scaled it to the dimensions derived from this fossil (see Supplementary Information). The 3D Print Toolbox in Blender provided a volume measurement for an <i>Arthropleura</i> -shaped object with the specified dimensions of 91509 cm 3, equivalent to <i>c.</i> 32– 50 kg based on the densities of extant giant millipedes. This range of estimates converges at an approximate weight of <i>c.</i> 50 kg, which is substantially larger than previous estimates, but inevita
description: Published as part of <i>Davies, Neil S., Garwood, Russell J., McMahon, William J., Schneider, Joerg W. &amp; Shillito, Anthony P., 2021, The largest arthropod in Earth history: insights from newly discovered Arthropleura remains (Serpukhovian Stainmore Formation, Northumberland, England), pp. 1-18 in Journal of the Geological Society (jgs 2021 - 115) (jgs 2021 - 115) 179 (3)</i> on pages 6-14, DOI: 10.1144/jgs2021-115, http://zenodo.org/record/5801508
description: {"references": ["Jordan, F. W. H. and von Meyer, H. 1854. Uber die Crustaceen der Steinkohlenformation von Saarbrucken. Palaeontographica, 4, 1 - 15.", "Guthorl, P. 1934. Die Arthropoden aus dem Carbon und Perm des Saar-Nahe- Pfalz-Gebietes. Abhandlungen der Preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt, Neue Folge, 164, 1 - 219.", "Guthorl P. 1935. Entdeckung und Bergung des grossten, bis jetzt bekannten Exemplars von Arthropleura armata Jordan &amp; v. Meyer in Grube Maybach- Saar. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, 87, 687 - 692.", "Hahn, G., Hahn, R. and Brauckmann, C. 1986. Zur Kenntnis von Arthropleura (Myriapoda; Ober-Karbon). Geologica et Palaeontologica, 20, 125 - 137.", "Schneider, J. and Barthel, M. 1997. Eine Taphocoenose mit Arthropleura (Arthropoda) aus dem Rotliegend (? Unterperm) des Dohlen-Becken (Elbe- Zone, Sachsen). Freiberger Forschungsheft C, 466, 183 - 223.", "Schneider, J. W. and Werneburg, R. 2010. Arthropleura, der grosste landlebende Arthropode der Erdgeschichte - neue Funde und neue Ideen. Semana, 25, 75 - 100.", "Ro\u03b2ler, R. and Schneider, J. W. 1997. Eine bemerkenswerte Palaobiocoenose im Unterkarbon Middeleuropastt - Fossilfuhrung und Palaoenvironment der Hainichen-Subgruppe (Erzgebirge-Becken). Veroffentlichungen des Museum fur Naturkunde Chemnitz, 20, 5 - 44.", "Briggs, D. E. G., Stankiewicz, B. A., Meischner, D., Bierstedt, A. and Evershed, R. P. 1998. Taphonomy of arthropod cuticles from Pliocene lake sediments, Willershausen, Germany. Palaios, 13, 386 - 394, https: // doi. org / 10.2307 / 3515326", "McCoy, V. E. and Brandt, D. S. 2009. Scorpion taphonomy: criteria for distinguishing fossil scorpion molts and carcasses. The Journal of Arachnology, 37, 312 - 320, https: // doi. org / 10.1636 / SH 09 - 07.1", "De Paola, N., Holdsworth, R. E., McCaffrey, K. J. and Barchi, M. R. 2005. Partitioned transtension: an alternative to basin inversion models. Journal of Structural Geology, 27, 607 - 625, https: // doi. org / 10.1016 / j. jsg. 2005.01.006", "Kjemperud, M. V. 2011. Fault Architecture of Reactivated Faults in Carboniferous Sediments, Northumberland, Great Britain. Master' s thesis, University of Oslo.", "Kimbell, G. S., Chadwick, R. A., Holliday, D. W. and Werngren, O. C. 1989. The structure and evolution of the Northumberland Trough from new seismic reflection data and its bearing on modes of continental extension. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 146, 775 - 787, https: // doi. org / 10.1144 / gsjgs. 146.5. 0775", "Leeder, M. R., Fairhead, D., Lee, A., Stuart, G. and Clemmey, H. 1989. Sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the Northumberland Basin. In: Arthurton, R. J., Gutteridge, P. and Nolan, S. C. (eds) The Role of Tectonics in Devonian and Carboniferous Sedimentation in the British Isles. Yorkshire Geological Society, Occasional Publications, 6, 207 - 223.", "Chadwick, R. A., Holliday, D. W., Holloway, S. and Hulbert, A. G. 1995. The Structure and Evolution of the Northumberland - Solway Basin and Adjacent Areas. British Geological Survey, Subsurface Memoirs. HM Stationery Office.", "Fraser, A. J. and Gawthorpe, R. L. 2003. An Atlas of Carboniferous Basin Evolution in Northern England. Geological Society, London, Memoirs, 28, https: // doi. org / 10.1144 / GSL. MEM. 2003.028", "Briggs, D. E. G. and Almond, J. E. 1994. The arthropleurids from the Stephanian (Late Carboniferous) of Montceau-les-Mines (Massif Central - France). Memoires de la Section des Sciences, 12, 127 - 135.", "Brauckmann, C., Groning, E. and Thiele-Bourcier, M. 1997. Kopf-und Schwanz- Region von Arthropleura armata Jordan, 1854 (Arthropoda; Ober-Karbon). Geologica et Palaeontologica, 31, 79 - 92.", "Kraus, O. and Brauckmann, C. 2003. Fossil giants and surviving dwarfs. Arthropleurida and Pselaphognatha (Atelocerata, Diplopoda): characters, phylogenetic relationships and construction. Verhandlungen des naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg, 40, 5 - 50.", "Hannibal, J. T. 1997. Remains of Arthropleura, a gigantic myriapod arthropod, from the Pennsylvanian of Ohio and Pennsylvania. Kirtlandia, 50, 1 - 9.", "Boule M. 1893. Sur les debris d' Arthropleura trouves en France. Bulletin de la Societe de l' Industrie Minerale, 7, 619 - 638.", "Pruvost, P. 1930. La faune continentale du terrain houiller de la Belgique. Memoires du Musee royal d' histoire naturelle de Belgique, 44, 103 - 282.", "Martino, R. L. and Greb, S. F. 2009. Walking trails of the giant terrestrial arthropod Arthropleura from the Upper Carboniferous of Kentucky. Journal of Paleontology, 83, 140 - 146, https: // doi. org / 10.1666 / 08 - 093 R. 1", "Ryan, R. 1986. Fossil myriapod trails in the Permo-Carboniferous strata of northern Nova Scotia, Canada. Atlantic Geology, 22, 156 - 161, https: // doi. org / 10.4138 / 1604", "Kraus, W. 1993. Eine 2 m lange semiflexible Rekonstruktion von Arthropleura, dem grossten bekannten Myriapoden aus dem Oberkarbon Mitteleuropas. Der Praparator, 39, 141 - 158.", "Schneider, J. W. and Werneburg, R. 1998. Arthropleura und Diplopoda (Arthropoda) aus dem Unter-Rotliegend (Unter-Perm, Assel) des Thuringer Waldes (Sudwest-Saale-Senke). Veroffentlichungen Naturhistorisches Museum Schleusingen, 13, 19 - 36.", "Calman, W. T. 1914. III. - On Arthropleura Moyseyi, n. sp., from the Coal- Measures of Debyshire. Geological Magazine, 1, 541 - 544, https: // doi. org / 10. 1017 / S 0016756800153452", "Sheppard, T. H. 2005. A Stratigraphical Framework for the Upper Langsettian and Duckmantian of the East Pennine Coalfields. British Geological Survey IR / 05 / 070.", "Rolfe, W. I. and Ingham, J. K. 1967. Limb structure, affinity and diet of the Carboniferous ' centipede' Arthropleura. Scottish Journal of Geology, 3, 118 - 124, https: // doi. org / 10.1144 / sjg 03010118", "Briggs, D. E. G., Plint, A. G. and Pickerill, R. K. 1984. Arthropleura trails from the Westphalian of eastern Canada. Palaeontology, 27, 843 - 855.", "Pearson, P. N. 1992. Walking traces of the giant myriapod Arthropleura from the Strathclyde Group (Lower Carboniferous) of Fife. Scottish Journal of Geology, 28, 127 - 133, https: // doi. org / 10.1144 / sjg 28020127", "Pearson, P. N. and Gooday, R. J. 2019. A large Taenidium burrow from the Upper Carboniferous of Corrie, Isle of Arran, and remarks on the association of Taenidium burrows and Diplichnites trails. Scottish Journal of Geology, 55, 135 - 140, https: // doi. org / 10.1144 / sjg 2019 - 011", "Ryan, R. J. and Boehner, R. C. 1994. Geology of the Cumberland Basin, Cumberland, Colchester and Pictou Counties, Nova Scotia. Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy Branches, Memoir, 10.", "Bercovitz, K. and Warburg, M. R. 1985. Developmental patterns in two populations of the millipede Archispirostreptus syriacus (De Saussure) in Israel (Diplopoda). Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde, 55, 37 - 46.", "Mwabvu, T., Hamer, M., Slotow, R. O. B. and Barraclough, D. 2010. A revision of the taxonomy and distribution of Archispirostreptus Silvestri 1895 (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida, Spirostreptidae), and description of a new spirostreptid genus with three new species. Zootaxa, 2567, 1 - 49, https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 2567.1.1", "Horvathova, T., Sustr, V. et al. 2021. Methanogenesis in the digestive tract of the tropical millipedes Archispirostreptus gigas (Diplopoda, Spirostreptidae) and Epibolus pulchripes (Diplopoda, Pachybolidae). Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 87, AEM- 00614, https: // doi. org / 10.1128 / AEM. 00614 - 21", "Garwood, R. and Dunlop, J. 2014. The walking dead: Blender as a tool for paleontologists with a case study on extinct arachnids. Journal of Paleontology, 88, 735 - 746, https: // doi. org / 10.1666 / 13 - 088", "Rudkin, D. M., Young, G. A., Elias, R. J. and Dobrzanski, E. P. 2003. The world' s biggest trilobite - Isotelus rex new species from the Upper Ordovician of northern Manitoba, Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 77, 99 - 112, https: // doi. org / 10.1666 / 0022 - 3360 (2003) 077 &lt;0099: TWBTIR&gt; 2.0. CO; 2", "Braddy, S. J., Poschmann, M. and Tetlie O. E. 2008. Giant claw reveals the largest ever arthropod. Biology Letters, 4, 106 - 109, https: // doi. org / 10.1098 / rsbl. 2007.0491", "Kraus, O. 2005. On the structure and biology of Arthropleura species (Atelocerata, Diplopoda; upper Carboniferous / lower Permian). Verhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg, 41, 5 - 23.", "McGhee, G. R., Jr 2018. Carboniferous Giants and Mass Extinction: the Late Paleozoic Ice Age World. Columbia University Press.", "Shear, W. A. and Edgecombe, G. D. 2010. The geological record and phylogeny of the Myriapoda. Arthropod Structure &amp; Development, 39, 174 - 190, https: // doi. org / 10.1016 / j. asd. 2009.11.002", "Lucas, S. G., Lerner, A. J., Hannibal, J. T., Hunt, A. P. and Schneider, J. W. 2005. Trackway of a giant Arthropleura from the Upper Pennsylvanian of El Cobre Canyon, New Mexico. In: Geology of the Chana Basin. New Mexico Geological Society, 56 th Field Conference Guidebook, 279 - 282.", "Proctor, C. J. 1998. Arthropleurids from the Westphalian D of Writhlington Geological Nature Reserve, Somerset. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 109, 93 - 98, https: // doi. org / 10.1016 / S 0016 - 7878 (98) 80009 - 6", "Greb, S. F., DiMichele, W. A. and Gastaldo, R. A. 2006. Evolution and Importance of Wetlands in Earth History. Geological Society of America, Special Papers, 399.", "Almond, J. E. 1985. Les Arthropleurides du Stephanien de Montceau-les-Mines, France. Bulletin de la Societe d' Histoire Naturelle d' Autun, 115, 59 - 60.", "Perrier, V. and Charbonnier, S. 2014. The Montceau-les-Mines Lagerstatte (Late Carboniferous, France). Comptes Rendus Palevol, 13, 353 - 367, https: // doi. org / 10.1016 / j. crpv. 2014.03.002", "Pavela M. 2018. Fossil species from the Carboniferous: Arthropleura Jordan &amp; Meyer 1854. PALEO, 2018, 74, https: // www. paleontology. cz / clanky / arthropleura. html", "Novozhylov, N. 1962. Family Arthropleuridae Zittel, 1848. In: Rodendorf, B. B. (ed.) Fundamentals of Paleontology. Arthropods. Tracheata and Chelicerata. Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 37 - 63.", "Dernov, V. 2019. Taphonomy and paleoecology of fauna and flora from deltaic sandstones of Mospinka Formation (Middle Carboniferous) of Donets Basin. Geo &amp; Bio, 18, 37 - 63, https: // doi. org / 10.15407 / gb 1805", "Falcon-Lang, H. J., Benton, M. J., Braddy, S. J. and Davies, S. J. 2006. The Pennsylvanian tropical biome reconstructed from the Joggins Formation of Nova Scotia, Canada. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 163, 561 - 576, https: // doi. org / 10.1144 / 0016 - 764905 - 063", "Falcon-Lang, H. J. and Miller, R. F. 2007. Palaeoenvironments and palaeoecology of the Early Pennsylvanian Lancaster Formation (' Fern Ledges') of Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 164, 945 - 957, https: // doi. org / 10.1144 / 0016 - 76492006 - 189", "Anderson, L. I., Dunlop, J. A., Horrocks, C. A., Winkelmann, H. M. and Eagar, R. M. C. 1997. Exceptionally preserved fossils from Bickershaw, Lancashire UK (Upper Carboniferous, Westphalian A (Langsettian )). Geological Journal, 32, 197 - 210, https: // doi. org / 10.1002 / (SICI) 1099 - 1034 (199709) 32: 3 &lt;197 :: AID-GJ 739&gt; 3.0. CO; 2 - 6", "Andree, K. 1913. Weiteres uber das carbonische Arthostraken-Genus Arthopleura Jordan. Palaeontographica, 60, 295 - 310.", "Vernon, R. D. 1912. On the geology and palaeontology of the Warwickshire Coalfield. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 68, 587 - 638, https: // doi. org / 10.1144 / GSL. JGS. 1912.068.01 - 04.35", "Pacyna, G., Florjan, S. and Borzecki, R. 2012. New morphological features of Arthropleura sp. (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) based on new specimens from the Upper Carboniferous of Lower Silesia (Poland). Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae, 82, 121 - 126.", "Richardson, E. S. 1959. Pennsylvanian invertebrates of the Mazon Creek area, Illinois; Trilobitomorpha, Arthropleurida II. Fieldana: Geology, 12, 79 - 82.", "Woodward, H. 1907. Further notes on the Arthropoda of the British Coal- Measures. Geological Magazine, 4, 539 - 549, https: // doi. org / 10.1017 / S 0016756800134120", "Waterlot, G. 1934. Etude de la faune continentale du terrain houiller sarrolorrain: Etude des Gites mineraux de la France. Bassin houiller de la Sarre et de la Lorraine 2, Faune fossile. L. Daniel, Lille.", "Salter, J. W. 1863. On some species of Eurypterus and allied forms. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 19, 81 - 87, https: // doi. org / 10. 1144 / GSL. JGS. 1863.019.01 - 02.15", "Pillola, G. L. and Zoboli, D. 2021. First occurrence of Arthropleura armata (Myriapoda) in the Moscovian (Carboniferous) of SW Sardinia (Italy). Bollettino della Societa Paleontologica Italiana, 60, 1 - 6, https: // doi. org / 10. 4435 / BSPI. 2021.01", "Stamberg, S. and Zajic, J. 2008. Carboniferous and Permian Faunas and their Occurrence in the Limnic Basins of the Czech Republic. Museum of Eastern Bohemia.", "Castro, M. P. 1997. Hallazgos de \" Arthropleura \" en el Estefaniense de la Peninsula Iberica. Revista espanola de Paleontologia, 12, 15 - 22.", "De La Comble, J. 1963. Un arthropode encore inconnu du Permien, Arthropleura spec. Bulletin de la Societe d' Histoire Naturelle d' Autun, 28, 6.", "Moreau, J. D., Gand, G., Fara, E., Galtier, J., Aubert, N. and Fouche, S. 2019. Trackways of Arthropleura from the Late Pennsylvanian of Graissessac (Herault, southern France). Historical Biology, 33, 996 - 1007, https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 08912963.2019.1675055", "Ro\u03b2ler, R., Zierold, T., Feng, Z., Kretzschmar, R., Merbitz, M., Annacker, V. and Schneider, J. W. 2012. A snapshot of an early Permian ecosystem preserved by explosive volcanism: new results from the Chemnitz petrified forest, Germany. Palaios, 27, 814 - 834, https: // doi. org / 10.2110 / palo. 2011. p 11 - 112 r", "Whyte, M. A. 2018. Mating trackways of a fossil giant millipede. Scottish Journal of Geology, 54, 63 - 68, https: // doi. org / 10.1144 / sjg 2017 - 013", "Briggs, D. E. G., Rolfe, W. D. I. and Brannan, J. 1979. A giant myriapod trail from the Namurian of Arran, Scotland. Palaeontology, 22, 273 - 291.", "Nelikhov, A. 2010. In the dungeons of Dzhezkazgan. PaleoMir, 1, 60 - 69, http: // iae. makorzh. ru / Tchudinov / Nelikhov 1 / index. htm", "Bailey, L. W. 1902. Report Upon the Carboniferous System of New Brunswick with Special Reference to Workable Coal. Geological Survey of Canada, No. 799; in Annual Report, Volume XIII, 1900 Geological Survey of Canada, No. 830 (1903), 1 M - 38 M.", "Ferguson, L. 1966. The recovery of some large track-bearing slabs from Joggins, Nova Scotia. Atlantic Geology, 2, 128 - 130, https: // doi. org / 10.4138 / 1501", "Calder, J., Rygel, M., Ryan, R., Falcon-Lang, H. and Herbert, B. 2005. Stratigraphy and sedimentology of early Pennsylvanian red beds at Lower Cove, Nova Scotia, Canada: the Little River Formation with redefinition of the Joggins Formation. Atlantic Geology, 41, 143 - 167, https: // doi. org / 10.4138 / 183", "Falcon-Lang, H. J., Minter, N. J., Bashforth, A. R., Gibling, M. R. and Miller, R. F. 2015. Mid-Carboniferous diversification of continental ecosystems inferred from trace fossil suites in the Tynemouth Creek Formation of New Brunswick, Canada. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 440, 142 - 160, https: // doi. org / 10.1016 / j. palaeo. 2015.09.002", "Getty, P., Sproule, R., Stimson, M. and Lyons, P. 2017. Invertebrate trace fossils from the Pennsylvanian Rhode Island formation of Massachusetts, USA. Atlantic Geology, 53, 185 - 206, https: // doi. org / 10.4138 / atlgeol. 2017.007", "Walter, H. and Gaitzsch, B. 1988. Beitrage zur Ichnologie limnisch-terrestrischer Sedimentationsraume. Teil II: Diplichnites minimus n. ichnosp. aus dem Permosiles des Flechtinger Hohenzuges. Freiberger Forschungshefter. C 427, 73 - 84.", "Langiaux, J. and Sotty, D. 1977. Ichnologie 4: pistes et empreintes dans le Stephanien de Blanzy-Montceau. La Physiophile, 86, 74 - 91.", "Briggs, D. E. G. 1986. Walking trails of the giant arthropod Arthropleura. Bulletin trimestriel de la Societe d' histoire naturelle et des amis du Museum d' Autun, 117, 141 - 147.", "Mangano, M. G., Buatois, L. A., West, R. R. and Maples, C. G. 2002. Ichnology of a Pennsylvanian Equatorial Tidal Flat: the Stull Shale Member at Waverly, Eastern Kansas. Kansas Geological Survey Bulletin, 245.", "Chaney D. S., Lucas S. G. and Elrick S. 2013. New occurrence of an arthropleurid trackway from the lower Permian of Utah. In: Lucas, S. G., DiMichele, W. A., Barrick, J. E., Schneider, J. W. and Spielmann, J. A. (eds) The Carboniferous - Permian Transition. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, 60, 64 - 65.", "Donovan, S. K. 2002. Arthropleurid myriapods. Geology Today, 18, 35 - 37, https: // doi. org / 10.1046 / j. 1365 - 2451.2002.00322. x", "Guthorl, P. 1940. Zur Arthropoden-Fauna des Karbons und Perms. 12. Insekten- und Arthropleura - Reste aus der Tiefbohrung 38 (Hangard) bei Neunkirchen- Saar. Palaontologische Zeitschrift, 22, 109 - 119, https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / BF 03041719", "Guthorl P. 1936. Arthropleura, der Riesengliederfussler des Oberkarbons, und seine Verbreitung in den europaischen Steinkohlenbecken. Gluckauf, 39, 965 - 976.", "Scarboro, D. D. and Tucker, M. E. 1995. Amphibian footprints from the mid- Carboniferous of Northumberland, England: sedimentological context, preservation and significance. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 113, 335 - 349, https: // doi. org / 10.1016 / 0031 - 0182 (95) 00068 - W", "Minter, N. J., Buatois, L. A., Mangano, M. G., Davies, N. S., Gibling, M. R. and Labandeira, C. 2016. The establishment of continental ecosystems. In: Buatois, L. A. and Mangano, M. G. (eds) The Trace-Fossil Record of Major Evolutionary Events. Springer, 205 - 324.", "DiMichele, W. A., Hook, R. W. et al. 1992. Paleozoic terrestrial ecosystems. In: Behrensmeyer, A. K., Damuth, J. D., DiMichele, W. A., Potts, R., Sues, H. - D. and Wing, S. L. (eds) Terrestrial Ecosystems Through Time. University of Chicago Press, 205 - 325.", "Davies, N. S. and Shillito, A. P. 2018. Incomplete but intricately detailed: the inevitable preservation of true substrates in a time-deficient stratigraphic record. Geology, 46, 679 - 682, https: // doi. org / 10.1130 / G 45206.1", "Allport, H. A., Davies, N. S., Shillito, A. P., Mitchell, E. G. and Herron, S. T. 2021. Non-palimpsested crowded Skolithos ichnofabrics in a Carboniferous tidal rhythmite: disentangling ecological signatures from the spatio-temporal bias of outcrop. Sedimentology, https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / sed. 12947", "Scott, A. C. and Taylor, T. N. 1983. Plant / animal interactions during the Upper Carboniferous. The Botanical Review, 49, 259 - 307, https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / BF 02861089", "Shillito, A. P. and Davies, N. S. 2020. The Tumblagooda Sandstone revisited: exceptionally abundant trace fossils and geological outcrop provide a window onto Palaeozoic littoral habitats before invertebrate terrestrialization. Geological Magazine, 157, 1939 - 1970, https: // doi. org / 10.1017 / S 0016756820000199", "Kearsey, T., Ellen, R., Millward, D. and Monaghan, A. A. 2015. Devonian and Carboniferous Stratigraphical Correlation and Interpretation in the Central North Sea, Quadrants 25 - 44. Energy and Marine Geoscience Programme Commissioned Report CR / 15 / 117.", "Kearsey, T. I., Millward, D., Ellen, R., Whitbread, K. and Monaghan, A. A. 2019. Revised stratigraphic framework of pre-Westphalian Carboniferous petroleum system elements from the Outer Moray Firth to the Silverpit Basin, North Sea, UK. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 471, 91 - 113, https: // doi. org / 10.1144 / SP 471.11", "Stormer, L. 1976. Arthropods from the Lower Devonian (Lower Emsian) of Alken an der Mosel, Germany. 5. Myriapoda a