Hyalella epikarstica Rodrigues, Bueno & Ferreira, 2014, n. sp.
Creators: name: Rodrigues, Stella Gomes
name: Bueno, Alessandra Angélica De Pádua
name: Ferreira, Rodrigo Lopes
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2014
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Malacostraca
Amphipoda
Hyalellidae
Hyalella
Hyalella epikarstica

description: Hyalella epikarstica n. sp.
Material examined. Holotype male, body length = 3.95 mm, head length = 0.36 mm, MNRJ 24771.
Paratypes: CCUFLA 0 344 with the same data as the holotype (one slide of a male and two entire individuals).
Type locality. Brazil, São Paulo state: Areias de Cima cave (24º35′28.5″ S 48º42′ 08.3″W), São Paulo state, Iporanga municipality, Areias stream (Betary river basin), 225 meters of altitude, July, 7, 2012, Ferreira, R.L. coll. Diagnosis. Body surface smooth. Eyes absent. Antenna 1 longer than antenna 2, flagellum with 9 articles. Antenna 2 less than half body length, flagellum with 7 articles. Maxilla 2 inner plate with only one long and strong papposerrate apical seta. Maxilliped inner plate with three strong and very long cuspidate setae apically; palp smaller than inner plate. Gnathopod 1 propodus length less than twice maximum width, hammer shaped, inner face with 4 pappose setae; carpus border not pectinate, only with simple setae. Gnathopod 2 carpus wider than long, posterior lobe slim without pectinate border, with few short simple setae; propodus ovate; palm sub-equal to posterior margin, slope oblique. Peraeopod 6 and 7 much more longer than others. Uropod 1 inner ramus of male with a long curved seta apically and four simple setae. Uropod 3 shorter than telson, peduncle longer than ramus and with only one long cuspidate seta with an accessory seta. Telson as long as wide, with two short simple apical setae. Sternal gills tubular on segments 3 to 7.
Description of male. (Fig. 1). Mean body length: 3.1 ± 0.85 mm, mean head length: 0.26 mm ± 0.1 mm (n=4). Body surface smooth; epimeral plates not acuminate.
Head as the same size as the first pereon segment, rostrum absent. Eyes absent (Fig. 1).
Antenna 1 (Fig. 2) longer than antenna 2, less than half body length; peduncle surpassing head length; flagellum with 9 articles, longer than peduncle; aesthetascs occurring distally on flagellum after article 4.
Antenna 2 (Fig. 3) peduncle not surpassing the second peraeonite, less than half body length, peduncle slender, longer than head; flagellum with 7 articles, shorter than peduncle.
Upper lip (Fig. 4) margin rounded; distal margin covered by setules on ventral and dorsal faces.
Basic amphipodan mandible, without palp; incisor toothed; molar large, cylindrical and triturative, with setules around its circumference; left lacinia mobilis with five teeth (Fig. 5), setal row on left mandible with two main pappose setae plus accessory setae; right lacinia mobilis with two teeth; setal row on right mandible with two main pappose setae plus accessory setae.
Lower lip (Fig. 6) outer lobes rounded and distally notched, with setules on ventral and dorsal faces; strongly irregular surface between the outer lobes.
Maxilla 1 (Fig. 7) palp uniarticulate, short, longer than wide, reaching less than half length the distance between the base of the palp and and the apex of the outer plate, with a long and strong seta; inner plate slender, shorter than outer plate, with two long papposerrate apical setae presenting long setules, with few minute setae on the inner margin; outer plate with nine serrate setae.
Maxilla 2 (Fig. 8) inner plate slightly shorter than outer plate, with only one long and strong papposerrate apical seta, eight serrulate and several simple apical setae; outer plate with abundant long simple setae; outer and inner plates with several setules.
Maxilliped (Fig. 18) inner plate longer than wide, with three strong and very long cuspidate setae apically, several pappose setae on apical and inner margins; outer plate shorter than inner plate, with several simple setae mediomarginally and apically; palp sub-equal in length as outer plate and shorter than inner plate, 4-articulate; article 1 longer than wide, outer and inner faces with few simple setae; article 2 longer than wide, inner margin with several long simple setae; article 3 longer than wide, outer and inner margins with several extremely long simple setae; dactylus unguiform with few simple setae, shorter than other articles, inner border with several simple setae; distal nail sub-equal to dactylus.
Gnathopod 1 (Fig. 9) subchelate; coxal plate wider than long, with simple setae on the anteromarginally; basis, ischium and merus with simple setae posteromarginally; carpus longer than wide, shorter than propodus, with posterior lobe produced and forming a scoop-like structure, without pectinate margin, with few simple setae; propodus width about ¾ of maximum length, hammer-shaped (Fig. 10), without setae on anterior margin, without comb-scales, inner face with four serrate setae, with a simple seta on the disto-posterior margin; palm slope oblique, margin slightly concave, palm with many simple setae, posterior distal corner with one long and strong cuspidate seta with an accessory seta; dactylus claw-like surpassing the palm, without comb-scales, with one plumose seta anteriorly and few setae on the inner curvature.
Gnathopod 2 (Fig. 11) subchelate; basis hind margin with five simple setae; merus with few simple setae posteromarginally; carpus wider than long, posterior lobe nawrolly produced between merus and propodus, without pectinate border, with few short simple setae; propodus ovate (Fig. 12), length 1.1 maximum width, without combscales; palm sub-equal to posterior margin of propodus, slope oblique, with one row of several cuspidate setae with an accessory setae and simple setae, posterior distal corner with two long and strong cuspidate setae and with a deep cup for dactylus; dactylus claw-like, congruent with palm, plumose seta anteriorly, without comb-scales.
Peraeopods 3 to 7 simple. Peraeopod 3 (Fig. 13) coxal plate longer than wide, width about half its length, with small simple setae on the border; merus and carpus posterior margin with cluster of simple setae; propodus posterior margin with cuspidate setae; dactylus less than half-length of propodus. Peraeopod 4 (Fig. 14) coxal plate excavated posteriorly, wider than long, with small simple setae on the border; merus and carpus posterior margin with clusters of simples setae; propodus posterior margin with simple setae; dactylus less than half-length of propodus. Peraeopod 5 (Fig. 15) coxal plate wider than long, with two lobes and small simple setae on the border; merus, carpus and propodus margin with 10 marginal clusters of 1-5 cuspidate setae with an accessory setae; dactylus less than half-length of propodus. Peraeopod 6 (Fig. 16) coxal plate wider than long, with two lobes and small simple setae on the border; merus, carpus and propodus margin with 10 marginal clusters of 1–5 cuspidate setae with an accessory setae; dactylus less than half-length of propodus. Peraeopod 7 (Fig. 17) coxal plate wider than long with small simple setae on the border; merus, carpus and propodus margin with 10 marginal clusters of 1–5 cuspidate setae with an accessory setae; dactylus less than half-length of propodus. Peraeopod 3 sub-equal to peraeopod 4; peraeopod 5 shorter than others; peraeopods 6 sub-equal to 7, both longer than others.
Pleopods (Fig. 19) peduncle shorter than rami, with two coupling spines; both rami with several plumose setae.
Uropod 1 (Fig. 20) peduncle longer 1.3 times than rami; outer ramus longer than inner ramus; outer ramus with two dorsal simple setae and five simple setae apically, one much more longer than the others; inner ramus with one dorsal simple seta, male with a long curved seta apically on the ramus, four simple setae apically; peduncle with five simple setae dorsally.
Uropod 2 (Fig. 21) shorter than uropod 1; inner ramus with only one dorsal simple seta and five distal simple setae; outer ramus with only one dorsal simple seta and four distal setae; peduncle longer and wider than rami, with three simple setae.
Uropod 3 (Fig. 22) shorter than telson, than peduncle of uropod 1 and peduncle of uropod 2; inner ramus absent; outer ramus uniarticulate; peduncle longer than wide, with only one long cuspidate seta with an accessory seta; ramus shorter than peduncle; basal width 3 times the width of ramus apex, with two cuspidate setae with an accessory seta.
Telson (Fig. 23) entire, apically rounded, as long as wide, with two short simple apical setae; plumose setae may be present laterally.
Coxal gills sac-like, present on peraeonites 2 to 6. Sternal gills tubular present on peraeonites 3 to 7. Both coxal and sternal gills are extremely reduced in size.
Female. Mean body length: 4 ± 0.8 mm, mean head length: 0.3 ± 0.1 mm (n=2). Antenna 1 similar in shape to male, flagellum with 10 articles; antenna 2 similar in shape to male, flagellum with 7 articles. Gnathopod 1 (Fig. 24) different to male gnathopod 1; carpus longer than wide, without comb-scales; with posterior lobe produced and forming a scoop-like structure, without pectinate margin, with few simple setae; propodus (Fig. 25) as long as wide, “hatchet-shaped”, palm longer than posterior margin of propodus, without comb-scales, inner face with four simple setae, palm slope transverse, posterior distal corner with two long and strong cuspidate seta with an accessory seta; dactylus claw-like. Gnathopod 2 (Fig. 26) similar in size and shape to gnathopod 2; different in shape to male gnathopod 2 and smaller; propodus (Fig. 27) as long as wide, subchelate, inner face with four simple setae, palm transverse, without comb-scales. Telson similar in shape to male.
Habitat. The epikarst is defined as the heterogeneous interface between unconsolidated material (soil, sediments and modified carbonate rock) that is partially saturated with water and capable of delaying or storing water and locally rerouting vertical infiltration to the deeper regional phreatic zone of the karst aquifer (Jones et al. 2004). The main traits of the epikarst habitats usually prevent direct sampling, and most species known from this habitat are indirectly collected especially in dripping pools (Pipan & Culver 2005).
This is the case of H. epikarstica. Although there are three distinct streams in the Areias de Cima cave, no specimen was recorded in these lotic habitats. The specimens were only collected in a single place within the cave, located in the eastern branch of the system (Figs. 28, 29 and 31). Specimens were found swimming in small travertine pools, which were being filled by percolating water coming from a small crack in the cave wall (Fig. 32). During five visits to the cave, specimens were only recorded two times, when the area was under heavy rain. We believe that the amplified flow of water from the epikarst has washed out few specimens that were carried out to the travertine pools. In the other episodes in which we have visited the cave, the travertive pools were almost empty, clearly indicating that they are not persistent habitats, thus, incapable to maintain populations.
There are other amphipod species that are considered epikarstic, as Niphargobates orophobata Sket, 1981 and Niphargus fongi Fišer & Zagmajster, 2009. Specimens from the former were collected from a jet of percolating water in Panina cave, Slovenia, while specimens from the latter were found in pools of percolating water, some of which temporarily dry up. According to Fišer & Zagmajster (2009) the narrow distribution range of N. fongi suggests that the species lives in limestone fissures, possibly in the epikarst ecotone. This is the same situation observed for H. epikarstica, what strongly suggests that the species is associated to these “above cave” compartments.
Conservation. The karst of Iporanga is associated with carbonate rocks of the Açungui Group, which was formed between 1.45 billion and 540 million years ago (Campanha et al. 2008; 2010). The caves and their special features developed during the Quaternary Period (between 1.8 million years and the present) and are still active (Karmann 1994). The external vegetation comprises the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, which is well preserved in the area (Fig. 33).
The Areias de Cima cave is part of the “Areias system”, which is divided into three caves connected by the Areias stream. The Areias de Cima cave is the first (upstream) cave in the system, possessing around 5.5 km of linear projection, being divided in two conduits, interconnected near the entrance (Fig. 29). The specimens were found in the left branch of the cave (Fig. 31). To date, 17 troglobitic species (16 invertebrates and one vertebrate) have been recorded for the whole system (Trajano 2007; Ázara & Ferreira 2013), which is considered the richest system for troglobitic fauna in Brazil. This cave system has been studied for over 100 years and only in recent samplings few specimens of this new species were found, which strongly suggests its epikarstic status.
The cave system is protected, since it is located within a Conservation Unit (Parque Estadual Turístico do Alto Ribeira – PETAR). Tourist visits are prohibited, so that the cave is extremely preserved.
Etymology. The species epithet “ epikarstica ” refers to the species habitat. The word is feminine in gender.
Remarks. Hyalella epikarstica has similar characteristics and also adaptations as other troglobiotic species of the genus. The new species shares the following characters with H. imbya and H. muerta: presents the antenna 1 longer than antenna 2; absence of comb-scales on both gnathopods; and sternal gills present on peraeonites 3–7. However, H. epikarstica differs from H. muerta by the presence of a curved seta on the inner ramus of uropod 1 and differs from H. imbya on the palm slope of gnathopod 1. The palm slope on gnathopod 1 on H. imbya is transversal and on H. epikarstica is oblique, a characteristic very unusual in the genus for this appendage.
Hyalella epikarstica is different in almost all the morphological characteristics when compared to H. anophtalma, like size proportions of antennae; presence of comb-scales in gnathopods; arrangement of sternal gills; presence of an apical seta on telson; and presence of a curved setae on uropod 1.
Possibly because both species live close to each other, H. epikarstica share many morphological characteristics with H. caeca, such as: absence of comb-scales on gnathopods; presence of sternal gills on peraeonites 3–7; number and arrangement of setae on telson; and the presence of only one papposerrate apical seta on the inner plate of maxilla 2. Although, unlike the new species, H. caeca does not have a curved seta on the inner ramus of uropod 1; antenna 1 is shorter than 2; carpus of gnathopod 1 is longer than propodus and bears serrate setae and denticles on the carpus distal lobe, forming a pectinate margin, absent on H. epikarstica.
Finally, H. spelaea differs from H. epikarstica in the following: reduced but present eyes; absence of a curved seta on inner ramus of uropod 1; sternal gills on peraeonites 2–7; antenna 1 smaller than antenna 2; and presence of comb-scales on gnathopod 1.
Moreover, H. epikarstica has unique morphological characteristics: extreme reduction in the size of sternal and coxal gills; lower lip with strongly irregular surface between the outer lobes; maxilliped inner plate with three very long cuspidate setae apically and palp extremely reduced with long simple setae; distal lobe basis of carpus on gnathopod 1 and 2 without pectinate margin, serrate setae, denticles or comb-scales, only with few simple setae; and palm slope oblique on both male gnathopods.
description: Published as part of Rodrigues, Stella Gomes, Bueno, Alessandra Angélica De Pádua & Ferreira, Rodrigo Lopes, 2014, A new troglobiotic species of Hyalella (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Hyalellidae) with a taxonomic key for the Brazilian species, pp. 200-214 in Zootaxa 3815 (2) on pages 201-208, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3815.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/225119