Ten key short-term sectoral benchmarks to limit warming to 1.5°C
Creators: name: Kuramochi, Takeshi
name: Höhne, Niklas
name: Schaeffer, Michiel
name: Cantzler, Jasmin
name: Hare, Bill
name: Deng, Yvonne
name: Sterl, Sebastian
name: Hagemann, Markus
name: Rocha, Marcia
name: Yanguas-Parra, Paola Andrea
name: Goher-Ur-Rehman Mir
name: Lindee Wong
name: El-Laboudy, Tarik
name: Wouters, Karlien
name: Deryng, Delphine
name: Blok, Kornelis
Publisher: name: Taylor & Francis
Year: 2017
Subjects: subject: 59999 Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified
subject: FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences
subject: FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences
subject: 69999 Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
subject: FOS: Biological sciences
subject: FOS: Biological sciences
subject: Science Policy

description: This article identifies and quantifies the 10 most important benchmarks for climate action to be taken by 2020–2025 to keep the window open for a 1.5°C-consistent GHG emission pathway. We conducted a comprehensive review of existing emissions scenarios, scanned all sectors and the respective necessary transitions, and distilled the most important short-term benchmarks for action in line with the long-term perspective of the required global low-carbon transition. Owing to the limited carbon budget, combined with the inertia of existing systems, global energy economic models find only limited pathways to stay on track for a 1.5°C world consistent with the long-term temperature goal of the Paris Agreement. The identified benchmarks include: Sustain the current growth rate of renewables and other zero and low-carbon power generation until 2025 to reach 100% share by 2050;No new coal power plants, reduce emissions from existing coal fleet by 30% by 2025;Last fossil fuel passenger car sold by 2035–2050;Develop and agree on a 1.5°C-consistent vision for aviation and shipping;All new buildings fossil-free and near-zero energy by 2020;Increase building renovation rates from less than 1% in 2015 to 5% by 2020;All new installations in emissions-intensive sectors low-carbon after 2020, maximize material efficiency;Reduce emissions from forestry and other land use to 95% below 2010 levels by 2030, stop net deforestation by 2025;Keep agriculture emissions at or below current levels, establish and disseminate regional best practice, ramp up research;Accelerate research and planning for negative emission technology deployment. Sustain the current growth rate of renewables and other zero and low-carbon power generation until 2025 to reach 100% share by 2050; No new coal power plants, reduce emissions from existing coal fleet by 30% by 2025; Last fossil fuel passenger car sold by 2035–2050; Develop and agree on a 1.5°C-consistent vision for aviation and shipping; All new buildings fossil-free and near-zero energy by 2020; Increase building renovation rates from less than 1% in 2015 to 5% by 2020; All new installations in emissions-intensive sectors low-carbon after 2020, maximize material efficiency; Reduce emissions from forestry and other land use to 95% below 2010 levels by 2030, stop net deforestation by 2025; Keep agriculture emissions at or below current levels, establish and disseminate regional best practice, ramp up research; Accelerate research and planning for negative emission technology deployment. <b>Key policy insights</b>These benchmarks can be used when designing policy options that are 1.5°C, Paris Agreement consistent.They require technology diffusion and sector transformations at a large scale and high speed, in many cases immediate introduction of zero-carbon technologies, not marginal efficiency improvements.For most benchmarks we show that there are signs that the identified needed transitions are possible: in some specific cases it is already happening. These benchmarks can be used when designing policy options that are 1.5°C, Paris Agreement consistent. They require technology diffusion and sector transformations at a large scale and high speed, in many cases immediate introduction of zero-carbon technologies, not marginal efficiency improvements. For most benchmarks we show that there are signs that the identified needed transitions are possible: in some specific cases it is already happening.