Additional file 1 of Effectiveness of geriatric rehabilitation in inpatient and day hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Creators: name: Wong, Eric K. C.
name: Hoang, Peter M.
name: Kouri, Andrew
name: Gill, Sandeep
name: Huang, Yu Qing
name: Lee, Janice C.
name: Weiss, Sophie M.
name: Daniel, Raymond
name: McGowan, Jessie
name: Amog, Krystle
name: Sale, Joanna E. M.
name: Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee
name: Naimark, David M. J.
name: Tricco, Andrea C.
name: Straus, Sharon E.
Publisher: name: figshare
Year: 2024
Subjects: Medicine
Biotechnology
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
Cancer
Science Policy
Mental Health
Computational Biology

description: Additional file 1: Appendix 1. Search strategy. Appendix 2. Mortality at longest follow up. Fig. S2.1 Subgroup analysis for mortality at longest follow up: indication for rehabilitation. Fig. S2.2 Subgroup analysis for mortality at longest follow up: mean age &lt; 80 vs. ≥ 80 years. Fig. S2.3 Subgroup analysis for mortality at longest follow up: follow up ≤ 6 months vs. &gt; 6 months. Fig. S2.4 Sensitivity analysis for mortality at longest follow up: Studies at low risk of bias from assignment to intervention. Fig. S2.5 Sensitivity analysis for mortality at longest follow up: Studies at low risk of bias from measurement of the outcome. Fig. S2.6 Subgroup analysis for mortality at longest follow up: cognitive status in eligibility criteria. Appendix 3. Mortality at discharge. Fig. S3.1 Subgroup analysis for mortality at discharge: indication for rehabilitation. Fig. S3.2 Subgroup analysis for mortality at discharge: mean age &lt; 80 vs ≥ 80 years. Appendix 4. LTCH admission at longest follow up. Fig. S4.1 Subgroup analysis for LTCH admission at longest follow up: follow up ≤ 6 months vs. &gt; 6 months. Fig. S4.2 Subgroup analysis for LTCH admission at longest follow up: mean age &lt; 80 vs. ≥ 80 years. Fig. S4.3 Subgroup analysis for LTCH admission at longest follow up: indication for rehabilitation. Fig. S4.4 Sensitivity analysis: LTCH admission at longest follow up including only those at low risk of bias from assignment of intervention. Fig. S4.5 Sensitivity analysis: LTCH admission at longest follow up including only those at low risk of bias from measurement of outcome. Fig. S4.6 Subgroup analysis for LTCH admission at longest follow up: cognitive status in eligibility criteria. Appendix 5. LTCH admission at discharge. Appendix 6. Functional status at longest follow up. Fig. S6.1 Subgroup analysis for functional status at longest follow up: attrition &lt; 10% vs. ≥ 10%. Fig. S6.2 Subgroup analysis for functional status at longest follow up: follow up ≤ 6 months vs. &gt; 6 months. Fig. S6.3 Subgroup analysis for functional status at longest follow up: indication for rehabilitation. Fig. S6.4 Subgroup analysis for functional status at longest follow up: cognitive status in eligibility criteria. Appendix 7. Functional status at discharge. Fig. S7.1 Subgroup analysis for functional status at discharge: mean age &lt; 80 vs. ≥ 80. Fig. S7.2 Subgroup analysis for functional status at discharge: indication for rehabilitation. Fig. S7.3 Subgroup analysis for functional status at discharge: geriatrician in team. Fig. S7.4 Subgroup analysis for functional status at discharge: OT in team. Fig. S7.5 Subgroup analysis for functional status at discharge: nurse in team. Fig. S7.6 Subgroup analysis for functional status at discharge: social worker in team. Fig. S7.7 Subgroup analysis for functional status at discharge: cognitive status in eligibility criteria. Appendix 8. Functional improvement (as defined by authors) at longest follow up. Fig. S8.1 Subgroup analysis for functional improvement at longest follow up: mean age &lt; 80 vs. ≥ 80. Fig. S8.2 Subgroup analysis for functional improvement at longest follow up: attrition &lt; 10% vs. ≥ 10%. Fig. S8.3 Subgroup analysis for functional improvement at longest follow up: follow up ≤ 6 months vs. &gt; 6. Fig. S8.4 Subgroup analysis for functional improvement at longest follow up: indication for rehabilitation. Fig. S8.5 Subgroup analysis for functional improvement at longest follow up: cognitive status in eligibility criteria. Appendix 9. Functional improvement (as defined by authors) at discharge. Appendix 10. Discharge home. Fig. S10.1 Subgroup analysis for discharge home: mean age &lt; 80 vs. &gt; 80. Fig. S10.2 Subgroup analysis for discharge home: attrition &lt; 10% vs. &gt; 10%. Fig. S10.3 Subgroup analysis for discharge home: indication for rehabilitation. Fig. S10.4 Subgroup analysis for discharge home: geriatrician in team. Fig. S10.5 Subgroup analysis for discharge home: OT in team. Fig. S10.6 Subgroup analysis for discharge home: nurse in team. Fig. S10.7 Subgroup analysis for discharge home: social worker in team. Fig. S10.8 Subgroup analysis for discharge home: cognitive status in eligibility criteria. Appendix 11. Remaining home at longest follow up. Fig. S11.1 Subgroup analysis remaining home at longest follow up: mean age &lt; 80 vs. ≥ 80. Fig. S11.2 Subgroup analysis remaining home at longest follow up: attrition &lt; 10% vs. ≥ 10%. Fig. S11.3 Subgroup analysis remaining home at longest follow up: follow up &lt; 6 vs. &gt; 6 months. Fig. S11.4 Subgroup analysis remaining home at longest follow up: indication for rehabilitation. Fig. S11.5 Subgroup analysis remaining home at longest follow up: geriatrician in team. Fig. S11.6 Subgroup analysis remaining home at longest follow up: OT in team. Fig. S11.7 Subgroup analysis remaining home at longest follow up: nurse in team. Fig. S11.8 Subgroup analysis remaining home at longest follow up: social worker in team. Fig. S11.9 Subgroup analysis remaining home at longest follow up: cognitive status in eligibility criteria. Appendix 12. Length of stay in hospital. Fig. S12.1 Subgroup analysis for length of stay: mean age &lt; 80 vs. &gt; 80. Fig. S12.2 Subgroup analysis for length of stay: indication for rehabilitation. Fig. S12.3 Subgroup analysis for length of stay: geriatrician in team. Fig. S12.4 Subgroup analysis for length of stay: OT in team. Fig. S12.5 Subgroup analysis for length of stay: nurse in team. Fig. S12.6 Subgroup analysis for length of stay: social worker in team. Fig. S12.7 Subgroup analysis for length of stay: cognitive status in eligibility criteria. Appendix 13. Cognition at longest follow up. Appendix 14. Mood at longest follow up. Fig. S14.1 Subgroup analysis for mood: mean age &lt; 80 vs. ≥ 80. Fig. S14.2 Subgroup analysis for mood: follow up &lt; 6 vs. &gt; 6 months. Fig. S14.3 Subgroup analysis for mood: indication for rehabilitation. Fig. S14.4 Subgroup analysis for mood: geriatrician in team. Fig. S14.5 Subgroup analysis for mood: OT in team. Fig. S14.6 Subgroup analysis for mood: nurse in team. Fig. S14.7 Subgroup analysis for mood: social worker in team. Fig. S14.8 Subgroup analysis for mood: cognitive status in eligibility criteria. Appendix 15. Quality of life at longest follow up. Fig. S15.1 Subgroup analysis for quality of life: mean age &lt; 80 vs. ≥ 80. Fig. S15.2 Subgroup analysis for quality of life: follow up &lt; 6 vs. &gt; 6 months. Fig. S15.3 Subgroup analysis for quality of life: measure of quality of life. Fig. S15.4 Subgroup analysis for quality of life: indication for rehabilitation. Fig. S15.5 Subgroup analysis for quality of life: geriatrician in team. Fig. S15.6 Subgroup analysis for quality of life: OT in team. Fig. S15.7 Subgroup analysis for quality of life: nurse in team. Fig. S15.8 Subgroup analysis for quality of life: social worker in team. Fig. S15.9 Subgroup analysis for quality of life: cognitive status in eligibility criteria. Appendix 16. Supplementary table S1: Comparison of outcome estimates with other systematic reviews of geriatric rehabilitation.