Henicops washpoolensis Edgecombe & Hollington, 2005, n. sp.
Creators: name: Edgecombe, Gregory D.
name: Hollington, And Lauren M.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2005
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Chilopoda
Lithobiomorpha
Henicopidae
Henicops
Henicops washpoolensis

description: Henicops washpoolensis n. sp.
Figs. 2–48
Henicops sp., QLD Edgecombe et al., 2002 — Syst. Entomol. 27: 61
Henicops SE QLD Edgecombe & Giribet, 2003 — Afr. Inverts. 44: figs. 1–3. Henicops sp. SE QLD Edgecombe & Giribet 2003 — Zootaxa 152: table 1, fig. 38. Henicops n. sp. Edgecombe, 2004 — Insect. Syst. Evol. 35: fig. 1.1, 1.6
Diagnosis: Henicops with 33–51 (usually 38–45) antennal articles; posterior part of ocellus set inward of lateral margin of head shield; Tömösváry organ small, shallow, positioned inward of margin of cephalic pleurite; three or four teeth on each dental margin of maxillipede coxosternum, rarely five or exceptionally six; T7 with rounded, concave margin; two tarsomeres in legs 1–12, three tarsomeres in legs 13 and 14, distitarsus divided; leg 15 with three or four tarsomeres, basitarsus undivided, distitarsus with two or three tarsomeres; female gonopod with two relatively large, elongate, bullet­shaped spurs.
Holotype: Australian Museum [AM] KS 85696 (ex. AM KS 35225), male (Fig. 2), Washpool State Forest (now Washpool National Park), 29º28'29"S 152º20'53"E, track off Cedar Trail, 950 m, M. Gray and P. Croft, 22.ii.1992, pitfall. Length of head 2.3 mm; length of body 18.0 mm.
Paratypes: All Washpool NP. AM KS 35225, 1 female, 2 males, from type collection. AM, M. Gray and P. Croft, 22.ii.–19.iii.1992. From type locality: KS 35224, 2 males; KS 35226, 1 female; KS 35227, 1 male; KS 35228, 2 females, 1 male; KS 35229, 1 female, 1 male; KS 35230, 2 females; KS 35231, 4 males; KS 35232, 1 female, 3 males. Other sites off Cedar Trail: KS 35206, 1 female, 1 male; KS 35207, 1 female, 1 male; KS 35208, 2 males; KS 35209, 1 female; KS 35210, 3 females, 2 males; KS 35211, 1 female, 2 males (Fig. 4); KS 35212, 2 males; KS 35213, 2 females; KS 35214, 1 female; KS 35220, 3 females (Fig. 3); KS 35221, 1 female (Figs. 5–8, 33–36); KS 35222, 1 male; KS 35223, 1 female, KS 9359, 2 males, 2.3 km from Coombadjah along Moogem Rd, C. Horseman, 12.ii.1982; KS 85697, 1 male (Figs. 11–16, 19–32), Coombadjah Creek, C. Horseman, 12.ii.1982. M. Gray and G. Cassis, 4.ii.–9.iv.1993: KS 86367, 6 females, 18 males, NW Fire Trail, 29º27'30"S 152º16'52"E, 950 m; KS 86368, 8 females, 6 males, track off Cedar Trail, 29º28'42"S 152º20'23"E, 950 m; KS 86369, 3 females, 5 males, Cedar Creek, Cedar Trail, 29º28'29"S 152º20'53"E, 920 m; KS 86370, 8 males, 5 females, Washpool Forest Way, 29º24'48"S 152º17'01"E, 860 m; KS 86371, 3 females, 4 males, upper reaches of Eagle Hawk Ck, 29º24'31"S 152º16'53"E, 980 m; KS 86372, 1 female, 5 males, NW Fire Trail, 29º27'36"S 152º17'25"E, 950 m. KS 85698, 1 male (Figs. 9, 17, 40), Washpool NP, Washpool Walk, G. Edgecombe and Y. Y. Zhen, 26.ii.2002.
Other material: The Australian Museum and Queensland Museum have approximately 2000 registered specimens from some 300 localities (Fig. 1). A spreadsheet including those records, with geographical coordinates, elevation, collectors and collection dates, numbers of specimens and registrations, is available at the Zootaxa website (http:// www.mapress.com/2005f/zt00961.xls) and is deposited in hardcopy in the Archives of the Australian Museum.
Etymology: For Washpool National Park, the type locality.
Distribution: New South Wales and Queensland: southern distribution to Narrabeen, Sydney (33º43'), northern distribution to Mt Fisher (17º32') near Ravenshoe, Queensland. Most records in southeastern Queensland and northeastern New South Wales (Fig. 1); wet sclerophyll forest and rainforest; elevation range 10–1450 m.
Description: Length (anterior margin of head shield to posterior end of telson) up to 32 mm; width of head shield up to 3.9 mm.
Colour based on specimens in absolute ethanol: antenna deep orange with dark spots scattered over most articles; head shield orange with chestnut mottled network; tergites pale orange with brown mottling concentrated in longitudinal median band and near margins, and dark spots concentrated on margins; maxillipedes orange; sternites pale orange to yellow with purple mottling, darker mottling concentrated on posterior sternites and first genital sternite; prefemur to tibia yellow to pale orange with a large patch of purple mottling on anterior and posterior sides; tarsi deeper orange; genital sternite and gonopods orange. Head and posterior tergites typically chestnut in preserved specimens; most of trunk tergites light brown.
Head shield smooth. Frontal margin with strong anterior notch, weak median furrow confined to area just behind anterior notch (Fig. 10); posterior margin of head shield transverse or faintly concave; border variably slightly wider posteromedially than posterolaterally (Fig. 9). Antenna usually extends back to tergite 5 or 6; 33–51 antennal articles in specimens with head greater than 1.75 mm wide, majority of specimens with 38–45; basal two articles much larger than succeeding two (Fig. 13); markedly uneven change in the length of articles in proximal part of antenna, with short paired articles interspersed between longer articles, gradually elongating along antenna; trichoid sensilla increasing in density between articles 3 and 6, then about evenly dense along rest of antenna (Figs. 14, 45); one or two club­shaped thin­walled basiconic sensilla (Fig. 47) and groups of two (Fig. 48) to four conical thick­walled sensilla at anterior end of articles on dorsal side of antenna; cluster of slender, tapering sensilla brachyconica at tip of terminal antennal article (Fig. 46). Posterior part of ocellus set inward of lateral margin of head; ocellus domed, usually translucent, sometimes whitish to dark purple. Tömösváry organ small, shallow, its outer edge positioned well inward of lateral margin of cephalic pleurite (Figs. 15, 16). Labral margin with rounded shoulder beside midpiece, with a gradual break in curvature where fringe of branching bristles overhangs margin (Fig. 11); bristles with many short, spine­like projections along most of their length, sparse or lacking proximally (Fig. 12).
Maxillipede coxosternum trapezoidal (Figs. 17, 18, 41), dental margin broad, each half weakly convex (Figs. 19, 20); median notch shallow; teeth moderately large, triangular projections, usually 3+3 (Figs. 41–43) or 4+4 (Figs. 17–20) in large specimens, sometimes 5+ 5 in New South Wales samples, rarely 4+5/5+4, 5+6/6+5, very exceptionally 6+6; immature specimens typically 3+3; in 4+4 arrangement, outer pair distinctly more distant from each other than are inner pair (Fig. 20), as much as 1.8 times distance between inner pair. Coxosternum bearing moderate number of mostly short and moderately long setae, mostly in anterior half, especially concentrated behind dental margin and anterolaterally (Fig. 18). Tarsungulum with long, slender pretarsal part, about twice length of tarsal part (Fig. 21). Setae longer and slightly more densely clustered on inner side of tarsal part of tarsungulum than on outer side (Fig. 19). Duct of poison gland gradually widening distally, extending into tibia.
Four paired teeth on right mandible, left mandible with smaller flattened fifth tooth adjacent to furry pad (Fig. 29). 14–20 aciculae arranged as inner and outer rows (Fig. 26); some aciculae with pronounced serrations on both margins, along distal half to quarter of both sides of each acicula, others with simple margin along most of length except for near distal tip. Fringe of plumose bristles skirts aciculae, with abrupt transition to shorter row of scale­like bristles adjacent to midpoint of second tooth (Fig. 28); row of scale­like bristles evenly narrowing dorsally to very narrow fringe near furry pad (Fig. 29); plumose bristles narrow­based, basal part (not more than 20% of total length) lacking spines (Fig. 27); remainder of bristle with short, slender spines over all surfaces, spines gradually lengthening distally; bristles with a few strong spines distally. Accessory denticle field with pronounced groove between rows of denticles or at margin of denticle field (Figs. 25, 29); largest accessory denticles flattened conical, grading into small, slender, pointed denticles near fringe of scale­like bristles; slender, elongate accessory denticles do not intergrade with furry pad, separated by a narrow band of unsculpted cuticle; furry pad with many elongate, simple bristles, some bifid or pauciramous bristles (Fig. 29).
First maxilla with minute, wedge shaped sternite (Fig. 30). Apex of coxal process with a few (3–5) plumose setae and up to 14 simple setae (Fig. 32); distal article of telopodite with two rows of up to 18 long, plumose setae along inner margin, of similar structure to plumose setae on coxal process; branches developed along distal half of these setae (Figs. 31, 44). Band of short, simple setae on membranous strip alongside inner margin; main, more sclerotised field of distal article of telopodite usually with numerous evenly scattered setae (Fig. 44).
Second maxillary sternite small, fused with coxae. Up to 20 short setae scattered across anterior part of coxa (Fig. 22). Tarsus bearing numerous simple setae on outer surface (Fig. 23), dense cluster of plumose setae on membranous patch on inner surface (Fig. 24), up to 40 plumose setae in exceptionally large specimens; branches on plumose setae mostly confined to distal half. Claw small, composed of five digits, median and outer pair long, thick, with shorter, needle­like digit between median and each outer digit (Fig. 24).
Tergites weakly wrinkled. T1 trapeziform, varying from slightly narrower than head shield to slightly wider (Fig. 2), about 70% width of widest tergite (T8), posterior angles rounded, posterior margin transverse or (usually) faintly concave; lateral borders subparallel in TT3 and 5, posterior angles rounded; posterior border transverse or (usually) gently concave in T3, gently concave in T5; TT1, 3 and (variably) 5 bordered posteriorly; border of T7 incomplete posteriorly; posterior margin of T7 moderately and rather evenly concave; posterior margin of T8 slightly less concave than T7; posterior angles of TT7 and 8 blunt; posterior margins of TT10 and 12 moderately concave, posterior angles with obtuse, blunt corners; T9 with short projections; TT11 and 13 with moderately long projections; posterior margin of T14 strongly concave. Lateral margins of anterior tergites with a few moderately large setae, posterior margins with fringe of minute, slender setae; posterior tergites with more numerous moderate sized setae on lateral and posterior margins and scattered on surface.
Strong, pointed distal projections with sclerotised tips on tibiae of legs 1–14. Prefemur and femur with scattered moderate­sized setae; a few thickened setae encircling distal margin of femur; most setae on tibia of similar length to those on prefemur and femur but slightly more slender; three or four irregularly paired thicker, more pigmented setae on ventral face of tibia of legs 1–13; tarsus with combination of scattered slender setae, of fairly even length, and irregularly paired, thicker, pigmented setae at intervals along ventral face, two or three pairs on basitarsus, one or two on distitarsus. Setae on legs 14 and 15 more slender than on preceding legs, fine radiating setae on tarsus of leg 15. Two tarsomeres in legs 1–12, articulation between them strong on all legs, with small condyle dorsally; three tarsomeres in legs 13 (Fig. 6) and 14 (Fig. 7), basitarsus undivided, distitarsus with two parts; distitarsus of leg 14 occasionally with weak indication of an additional articulation on ventral half of distal tarsomere; leg 15 with three or four tarsomeres, basitarsus undivided, distitarsus in two or three parts (Fig. 8), the latter involving a weaker distal articulation; distitarsus about 70% length of basitarsus on leg 15; leg 15 basitarsus approximately 12 times longer than maximum width. Pretarsus with anterior and posterior accessory claws on all legs, about 40% length of main claw (Fig. 34), inserted on dorsolateral side of main claw, with gentle dorsoventral curvature (Figs. 33, 35, 36). Main claw gently curved, divided into many elongate scales along most of its length, with short, polygonal scales ventrolaterally in region beneath proximal part of accessory claws, a few (e.g., two) pores between some of these scales (Fig. 35), few pores on dorsal side of claw; scales indistinct proximally beneath bases of accessory claws, well defined dorsoproximally. Posteroventral spine present on all legs, about 10% length of main claw, directed distally, bearing slender subsidiary spine that parallels it on its dorsoproximal half (Fig. 35).
Sternal margins with numerous mostly moderately long setae; two pairs of setae across anteromedial part of sternites; setae slightly more numerous on posterior sternites.
Coxal pores round or transversely ovate, overwhelmingly 4,4,4,4/4,4,4,4 in large males and 5,5,5,5/5,5,5,5 in large females, males (width head shield>1.75 mm) maximum 4,5,5,5/4,5,5,5, minimum 2,3,3,3/2,3,3,3; females (width head shield>1.75 mm) maximum 6,5,5,5/6,5,5,5, minimum 3,3,3,3/3,3,3,3. Coxal pore field delimited from anteroventral face of coxa by rounded edge in most specimens, or with variably developed fold, when present, distal coxal pores may be partly concealed in ventral view by fold. Anal pores large in both sexes.
Female with sternite of segment 15 transverse or convex posteromedially. Tergites of first genital segment and telson usually well sclerotised. Sternite of first genital segment evenly scattered with a combination of up to 70 short and moderately long setae (Fig. 3). First article of gonopod bearing two elongate, bullet­shaped spurs of equal size; spurs gently curved (Fig. 38); generally 20–40 moderate to long setae on first article of gonopod (Figs. 37, 38), 15–20 on second, up to 30 in exceptionally large specimens; third article with up to 15 setae in very large specimens. Claw undivided, with numerous sensilla coeloconica on its dorsodistal surface.
Male with sternite of segment 15 rounded posteriorly/posterolaterally. Sternite of first genital segment small, divided, bearing about 15 long, evenly scattered setae on each half, including fringe of about 8 setae along each half of posterior margin (Figs. 4, 39). Gonopod of three articles and tapering terminal process; setae mostly moderately long, generally 10–12 on first article, 8–12 on second (Fig. 39), up to 13 on third; terminal process with about 20 short, slender spines densely grouped along much of its length (Fig. 40).
Discussion: Henicops washpoolensis is easily distinguished from all previously named mainland Australian species by the presence of only two tarsomeres on legs 1–12 (versus three in the other species, with the basitarsus divided). The ocellus is situated relatively inward on the head shield (versus more strongly bulging over the lateral margin of the head shield in other species). Most specimens through most of the species’ range in New South Wales have more than three teeth on the dental margin of the maxillipede coxosternum (versus fixed at three in other species), and most specimens have a greater number of articles in the antenna than do most other Henicops. The female gonopod spurs are more elongate (Figs. 3, 37, 38) than in several other species, such as H. dentatus and H. milledgei. The weakly recessed Tömösváry organ and simple, concave margin of tergite 7 allow for further distinction from H. dentatus and H. tropicanus.
Specimens from southeastern Queensland and the Border Ranges and Nightcap Range in northernmost New South Wales nearly invariably have 3+3 teeth on the maxillipede coxosternum, 4+4 being exceptional (see Fig. 1 for geographic locations cited in the following discussion). Samples from the Richmond Range and the type area (Washpool National Park) have a higher frequency of moderate sized and large (adult) specimens with 3+3 teeth than is observed farther south in the species’ range (e.g., Dorrigo, Barrington Tops, Mt Wilson), where the count of 4+4 is more constant. In the more southerly samples, 4+4 teeth are present in specimens smaller than the smallest of those with 4+4 teeth in the Washpool or Richmond Range samples, and the frequency of specimens with five teeth on one or both dental margins increases to the south.
Antennal segmentation also exhibits geographic variation. Most large specimens from northern New South Wales and southernmost Queensland (e.g., Lamington National Park) have more than 40 antennal articles. A population from the southern end of the distribution, Mt Wilson in the Blue Mountains, New South Wales, has only 34–37 articles, and with only rare exceptions specimens from north of 27ºS in Queensland likewise have relatively few (35–39) articles. Exceptionally specimens from the wet tropics (north Queensland) have antennal segmentation and maxillipede dentition more typical of samples from northern New South Wales (e.g., QMS 39916 from Mt Fisher has 45 antennal articles and 4+4 coxosternal teeth). Specimens from the northern part of the distribution in Queensland (Rockhampton region to the wet tropics) have fewer coxal pores than do samples from other parts of the species’ range (only 2,3,3,3/2,3,3,3 or 3,3,3,3/3,3,3,3 in males versus a typical 4,4,4,4/4,4,4,4 farther south).
The maximum number of coxal pores differs between females and males in that females have an anteroposterior polarity of an anterior increase (maximum 6,5,5,5/6,5,5,5) whereas males increase posteriorly (maximum 4,5,5,5/4,5,5,5). However, some specimens exhibit the opposite trends, with females increasing posteriorly (4,5,5,5/4,5,5,5) and males increasing anteriorly (5,4,4,4/5,4,4,4).
Several samples throughout the geographic range of the species in New South Wales include a few particularly large individuals (length up to 32 mm) that consistently have 3+3 teeth on the maxillipede coxosternum (Fig. 43). This is the case even where other cooccurring individuals of more typical size, up to about 25 mm in body length, have 4+4 teeth (e.g., at Mt Hyland, Dorrigo and the Barrington Tops). Other than size, no other morphological characters permit the anomalously large individuals to be distinguished from H. washpoolensis. A 435 bp fragment of mitochondrial 16S rRNA for one of the large individuals from Mt Hyland with 3+3 teeth is identical to that of specimens of H. washpoolensis from Washpool National Park with 4+4 teeth, and these sequences differ at several positions from other populations in New South Wales, e.g., Dorrigo, Nightcap Range, Bor­ der Ranges (work in preparation). Accordingly we have retained the large specimens in H. washpoolensis.
description: Published as part of Edgecombe, Gregory D. & Hollington, And Lauren M., 2005, Morphology and relationships of a new species of Henicops (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha) from New South Wales and Queensland, Australia, pp. 1-20 in Zootaxa 961 on pages 3-16, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.171240