Calomys Waterhouse 1837
Creators: name: Wilson, Don E.
name: Reeder, DeeAnn
Publisher: name: The Johns Hopkins University Press
Year: 2005
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Mammalia
Rodentia
Cricetidae
Calomys

description: Calomys Waterhouse 1837
Calomys Waterhouse 1837, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1837: 21.
Type Species: Mus bimaculatus Waterhouse 1837
Synonyms: Hesperomys Waterhouse 1839.
Species and subspecies: 12 species:
Species Calomys boliviae Thomas 1901
Species Calomys callidus Thomas 1916
Species Calomys callosus (Rengger 1830)
Species Calomys expulsus Lund 1841
Species Calomys hummelincki Husson 1960
Species Calomys laucha (Fischer 1814)
Species Calomys lepidus Thomas 1884
Species Calomys musculinus Thomas 1913
Species Calomys sorellus Thomas 1900
Species Calomys tener Winge 1887
Species Calomys tocantinsi Bonvicino, Lima, and Almeida 2003
Species Calomys venustus Thomas 1894
Discussion: Phyllotini. Generally viewed as a primitive clade relative to other phyllotine genera (Hershkovitz, 1962; Pearson and Patton, 1976; Reig, 1986), a viewpoint corroborated by phylogenetic analyses of trait data, both morphological (Braun, 1993; Steppan, 1993; 1995) and molecular (Smith and Patton, 1999). Those morphological studies differ in disclosing the basal position of Calomys spp. as monophyletic (Braun, 1993) or paraphyletic (Steppan, 1993); gene-sequence data convincingly ratify the taxon’s monophyly (Salazar-Bravo et al., 2001, 2002 a). Salazar-Bravo et al. (2001) dated the initial cladogenesis among Calomys species to ca. 9 million years ago, possibly spurred by the early development of South American grasslands, and reviewed hypotheses and data that concern the Great American Interchange and areas of origination. Known from Pleistocene of Argentina (e.g., Pardiñas, 1999). Status of North American Miocene-Pliocene form Bensonomys as a subgenus of Calomys (Baskin, 1978, 1986; Czaplewski, 1987; Korth, 1994; Lindsay and Jacobs, 1985) or as a merely dentally similar neotomine (Reig, 1980, 1984) needs decisive resolution, as it bears importantly on larger issues of New World rodent evolution and biogeography. McKenna and Bell (1997) assigned Bensonomys to Neotomini, within Sigmodontinae sensu lato.
Generic revision by Hershkovitz (1962), who reduced the previously recognized 10-15 species (e.g., Cabrera, 1961; Ellerman, 1941) to only four, two of which, laucha and callosus, have been revealed as species complexes (Bonvicino and Almeida, 2000; Corti et al., 1987; Massoia et al., 1968; Olds, 1988; Pearson and Patton, 1976; Reig, 1986; Williams and Mares, 1978). See Bonvicino and Almeida (2000) and Bonvicino et al. (2003 c) for compilation of the prolific karyological literature on the genus and correction of misidentified voucher specimens. Interspecific genealogies and species groups inferred from morphology (Olds, 1988), banded chromosomes (Espinosa et al., 1997; Vitullo et al., 1990), and cytochrome b sequences (Salazar-Bravo et al., 2001) are substantially incongruent. The following recognition of species attempts to integrate recent morphological, karyotypic, and molecular studies (principally, Bonvicino and Almeida, 2000; Olds, 1988; Salazar-Bravo et al., 2001). Nonetheless, the continued listing of Calomys specimens as species indeterminate (e.g., Anderson, 1997; Salazar-Bravo et al., 2001) and reports of new karyotypic variants (Espinosa et al., 1997; Lima and Kasahara, 2001) caution that considerable alpha taxonomic investigation is yet required.
description: Published as part of Wilson, Don E. & Reeder, DeeAnn, 2005, Order Rodentia - Family Cricetidae, pp. 955-1189 in Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 2, Baltimore :The Johns Hopkins University Press on page 1105, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7316535