The global summit on the efficacy and effectiveness of spinal manipulative therapy for the prevention and treatment of non-musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of the literature
Creators: name: Côté, Pierre
name: Hartvigsen, Jan
name: Axén, Iben
name: Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte
name: Corso, Melissa
name: Shearer, Heather
name: Wong, Jessica
name: Marchand, Andrée-Anne
name: Cassidy, J. D
name: French, Simon
name: Kawchuk, Gregory N
name: Mior, Silvano
name: Poulsen, Erik
name: Srbely, John
name: Ammendolia, Carlo
name: Blanchette, Marc-André
name: Busse, Jason W
name: Bussières, André
name: Cancelliere, Carolina
name: Christensen, Henrik W
name: De Carvalho, Diana
name: De Luca, Katie
name: Du Rose, Alister
name: Eklund, Andreas
name: Engel, Roger
name: Goncalves, Guillaume
name: Hebert, Jeffrey
name: Hincapié, Cesar A
name: Hondras, Maria
name: Kimpton, Amanda
name: Lauridsen, Henrik H
name: Innes, Stanley
name: Meyer, Anne-Laure
name: Newell, David
name: O’Neill, Søren
name: Pagé, Isabelle
name: Passmore, Steven
name: Perle, Stephen M
name: Quon, Jeffrey A.
name: Rezai, Mana
name: Stupar, Maja
name: Swain, Michael
name: Vitello, Andrew
name: Weber, Kenneth
name: Young, Kenneth J
name: Yu, Hainan
Publisher: name: BioMed Central
Year: 2021

description: Background: A small proportion of chiropractors, osteopaths, and other manual medicine providers use spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) to manage non-musculoskeletal disorders. However, the efficacy and effectiveness of these interventions to prevent or treat non-musculoskeletal disorders remain controversial. Objectives: We convened a Global Summit of international scientists to conduct a systematic review of the literature to determine the efficacy and effectiveness of SMT for the primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of non-musculoskeletal disorders. Global summit: The Global Summit took place on September 14–15, 2019 in Toronto, Canada. It was attended by 50 researchers from 8 countries and 28 observers from 18 chiropractic organizations. At the summit, participants critically appraised the literature and synthesized the evidence. Systematic review of the literature: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, and the Index to Chiropractic Literature from inception to May 15, 2019 using subject headings specific to each database and free text words relevant to manipulation/manual therapy, effectiveness, prevention, treatment, and non-musculoskeletal disorders. Eligible for review were randomized controlled trials published in English. The methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed independently by reviewers using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) criteria for randomized controlled trials. We synthesized the evidence from articles with high or acceptable methodological quality according to the Synthesis without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) Guideline. The final risk of bias and evidence tables were reviewed by researchers who attended the Global Summit and 75% (38/50) had to approve the content to reach consensus. Results: We retrieved 4997 citations, removed 1123 duplicates and screened 3874 citations. Of those, the eligibility of 32 articles was evaluated at the Global Summit and 16 articles were included in our systematic review. Our synthesis included six randomized controlled trials with acceptable or high methodological quality (reported in seven articles). These trials investigated the efficacy or effectiveness of SMT for the management of infantile colic, childhood asthma, hypertension, primary dysmenorrhea, and migraine. None of the trials evaluated the effectiveness of SMT in preventing the occurrence of non-musculoskeletal disorders. Consensus was reached on the content of all risk of bias and evidence tables. All randomized controlled trials with high or acceptable quality found that SMT was not superior to sham interventions for the treatment of these non-musculoskeletal disorders. Six of 50 participants (12%) in the Global Summit did not approve the final report. Conclusion: Our systematic review included six randomized clinical trials (534 participants) of acceptable or high quality investigating the efficacy or effectiveness of SMT for the treatment of non-musculoskeletal disorders. We found no evidence of an effect of SMT for the management of non-musculoskeletal disorders including infantile colic, childhood asthma, hypertension, primary dysmenorrhea, and migraine. This finding challenges the validity of the theory that treating spinal dysfunctions with SMT has a physiological effect on organs and their function. Governments, payers, regulators, educators, and clinicians should consider this evidence when developing policies about the use and reimbursement of SMT for non-musculoskeletal disorders.