Trigonisca (Trigonisca) mepecheu Engel, Rozen, Sepúlveda-Cano, Smith, Thomas, Ospina-Torres & Gonzalez, 2019, new species
Creators: name: Engel, Michael S.
name: Rozen, Jerome G.
name: Sepúlveda-Cano, Paula A.
name: Smith, Corey Shepard
name: Thomas, Jennifer C.
name: Ospina-Torres, Rodulfo
name: Gonzalez, Victor H.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2019
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hymenoptera
Apidae
Trigonisca
Trigonisca mepecheu

description: Trigonisca (Trigonisca) mepecheu Engel and Gonzalez, new species
Figures 2–9
DIAGNOSIS: The new species can be distinguished in the worker caste from its congeners by the following combination of traits: mandible bidentate; setae of face and mesoscutum unmodified (fig. 3B) (lacking the modified pomponlike or plumose decumbent setae of species such as T. nataliae (Moure) or T. pediculana (Fabricius)); setae of scape shorter than diameter of scape (fig. 3B); sculpturing of mesoscutellum distinctly weaker than that of mesoscutum giving the former a shinier appearance (figs. 2A, 3A, C) (versus most other species in which the two are identically sculptured); presence of broad yellowish-orange areas of coloration on clypeus, lower face, paraocular areas, gena, and postgena (figs. 2A, 3B) (integument entirely sooty black in T. graeffei: Friese, 1900; Moure, 1950; Albuquerque, 1990); marginal cell not pronouncedly bulky, with r-rs forming slightly acute angle with pterostigma (fig. 4A) (e.g., similar to species such as T. mixteca Ayala, T. intermedia Moure, and others), i.e., r-rs not completely orthogonal to pterostigma (versus r-rs distinctly orthogonal to pterostigma and forming with 3Rs more pronouncedly bulky U-shaped base to marginal cell, such as in T. graeffei, T. meridionalis Albuquerque and Camarago, T. nataliae, and others: Albuquerque, 1990); R along wing margin beyond pterostigma equal to width of marginal cell at tangent of pterostigmal apex (fig. 4A).
DESCRIPTION: Worker. Total body length 2.73 mm (2.33–3.00 mm), forewing length (apex of costal sclerite to wing tip) 2.03 mm (2.00– 2.07 mm). Head wider than long, width 1.00 mm (0.98–1.04 mm), length 0.92 mm (0.88–0.93 mm); compound eye length 0.64 mm (0.62–0.65 mm); upper interorbital distance 0.65 mm (0.65–0.69 mm), lower interorbital distance 0.60 mm (0.58–0.63 mm). Scape length 0.40 mm (0.38–0.40 mm), shorter than torulocellar distance, torulocellar distance 0.46 mm (0.46–0.50 mm). Clypeus broader than long, approximately 3.3–3.5× as wide as long, length 0.20 mm (0.20–0.21 mm), width 0.71 mm (0.69–0.71 mm). Malar area prominent, length approximately 1.6–1.8× flagellar diameter. Mandible bidentate, two small, acutely pointed preapical teeth. Metatibia 2.7–2.8× as long as wide, length 0.75 mm (0.75–0.83 mm), maximum width 0.28 mm (0.28–0.30 mm); outer surface gently concave in apical third, forming corbicula. Forewing with marginal cell base broad, basal angle 80°; R on wing margin beyond pterostigma as long as marginal cell width at pterostigmal apex; hind wing with 5 distal hamuli.
Integument of clypeus and lower face faintly and weakly microalveolate (fig. 3B), such sculpturing becoming more prominent on frons; vertex microalveolate as on frons, blending to weakly coriarious (sensu Harris, 1979) on gena, with such patterning becoming faint ventrally near postgena; postgena smooth. Pronotum faintly microalveolate; mesoscutum distinctly microalveolate (figs. 2B, 3A, C), with medial line present as weak impression about one-quarter mesoscutal midlength, parapsidal lines short, faintly impressed, about one-third length of medial line; tegula weakly and faintly imbricate; mesoscutellum with deep transverse depression bordering transscutal sulcus with mesoscutum and between axillae, surface faintly microalveolate to smooth; axilla weakly microalveolate, distinctly less sculptured than mesoscutum and appearing shinier; metanotum weakly microalveolate (as on axilla); mesepisternum and metepisternum tessellate (we consider tessellate to be on a gradation with microalveolate whereby the interspaces are larger and less impressed); propodeum tessellate (fig. 3A, C). Metasomal terga impunctate and smooth to weakly and exceedingly faintly coriarious, faintly evident coriarious areas more prominent on terga V and VI and on lateral, ventrally folded portions of terga; sterna weakly and faintly coriarious.
Integument generally black to dark brown (fig. 2A, B) except with yellowish orange on labiomaxillary complex, mandibles, labrum, clypeus, supraclypeal area, malar space, postgena, and lower gena, lower face (below tangent of antennal toruli), and in lower frons and paraocular areas, but not reaching to vertex of compound eye (fig. 3B); antennal scape yellowish orange on lower surface and brown on much of upper surface, particularly apically; pedicel and flagellum brown except light brown to yellowish orange on lower surface of first flagellomere and apex of apical flagellomere. Pronotum yellowish orange with areas of dark brown to black bordering mesoscutum and propleurae (fig. 2A); propleuron yellowish orange with dark brown along midline; mesoscutum black to dark brown; tegula translucent yellow; wing veins pale yellow to off-white, membranes hyaline clear, with iridescent reflections (fig. 4A); mesoscutellum as on mesoscutum except with narrow areas of lighter brown apicolaterally near margin with axillae; metanotum brown to dark brown; mesepisternum and metepisternum dark brown to black; propodeum dark brown to black; foreleg largely yellowish orange with areas of light brown to brown on upper or outer surfaces of profemur and protibia; midleg largely brown except mesotarsus yellowish orange, apical half of mesobasitarsus yellowish orange, and with areas of yellowish orange apically on mesocoxa, on mesotrochanter, basally and apically on mesofemur, and basally on mesotibia; hind leg largely brown to dark brown, except yellowish orange to light brown basally on metatibia, lighter brown on outer surface of metabasitarsus, and yellowish orange on metatarsus. Metasoma largely brown to dark brown, terga I–IV often lighter, either light brown or brown, than dark brown terga V and VI; terga II–IV variably with pale patch at lateral fold; sterna brown to dark brown.
Pubescence generally silvery white. Face with scattered minute, decumbent, silvery-white setae (fig. 3B), such setae largely simple except those of paraocular face below upper frons with some minute branches; vertex posterior to ocelli with a few more prominent, erect, longer, simple setae; setae of scape minute, simple, much shorter than diameter of scape, largely decumbent except a few suberect; gena and postgena sparsely setose, latter virtually bare. Mesoscutum with scattered, decumbent to suberect minute silvery setae (fig. 3C), similar to those of face, some with minute branches; intermixed along anterior borders with longer, erect simple, silvery-white setae, such longer erect setae more sparsely intermingled on mesoscutal disc; mesoscutellum with minute, decumbent setae sparse on disc, with more prominent, elongate, erect, simple, silvery-white setae posteriorly; metanotum with abundant, decumbent, silvery-white setae not obscuring surface; mesepisternum with minute to short decumbent setae similar to those of mesoscutum, such setae becoming sparser posteriorly and longer ventrally; metepisternum virtually bare, similar to posterior area of mesepisternum; propodeum largely bare except around propodeal spiracle. Setae of legs largely silvery white except more yellowish or yellowish orange on inner surfaces of tibiae and tarsi; elongate silvery, almost translucent, bristles of metatibial posterior margin simple, a few such setae on corbicular surface (fig. 4B); penicillus composed of long, pale yellow setae; rastellum composed of numerous, long, fine, soft setae; parapenicillus composed of elongate, pale yellow setae arching forward, some nearly meeting apex of penicillus. Metasoma sparsely setose; terga I–IV largely bare except for sparse, minute, decumbent, silvery white, simple setae apically; such setae becoming more abundant on more apical terga, most notably terga V and VI, intermixed with slightly longer suberect setae; sterna with similar subappressed to suberect setae apically, progressively setae more broadly present on more apical sterna.
Queen. Total body length 5.95 mm, forewing length (apex of costal sclerite to wing tip) 2.50 mm. Head slightly wider than long, width 1.04 mm, length 1.00 mm; compound eye length 0.65 mm; upper interorbital distance 0.73 mm, lower interorbital distance 0.71 mm. Scape length 0.50 mm, as long as torulocellar distance, torulocellar distance 0.50 mm. Clypeus broader than long, approximately 2× as wide as long, length 0.24 mm, width 0.50 mm. Malar area prominent, length approximately 1.8× flagellar diameter. Mandible narrower than that of worker, with a single, small preapical tooth. Intertegular distance 0.94 mm. Forewing with veins more yellowish than in worker, membrane hyaline, slightly tinged yellow like pale parchment; hind wing with 5 distal hamuli. Metatibia 3.1× as long as wide, length 0.69 mm, maximum width 0.22 mm; outer surface uniformly convex. Propodeum with exceedingly short basal area, broadly rounding into sloping posterior surface. Metasoma physogastric (fig. 5).
Integument of clypeus and face smooth and shining with minute, scattered setigerous punctures (fig. 6A); gena largely smooth and glabrous; postgena smooth and glabrous except setigerous punctures medially bordering hypostomal fossa, and at border with occiput. Pronotum smooth with scattered minute, setigerous punctures; mesoscutum smooth with scattered minute setigerous punctures (fig. 6B); mesoscutellum as on mesoscutum except punctures more widely spaced and those in posterior half slightly larger, axilla sculptured as on mesoscutum, preaxilla and mesoscutellar crest impunctate; metanotum with abundant minute, setigerous punctures; mesepisternum smooth with minute, setigerous punctures, such punctures becoming more widely spaced posteriorly with virtually glabrous space ventral to hypoepimeral area; metepisternum smooth with minute, setigerous punctures confined to upper quarter near wing base; basal area and posterior surface of propodeum smooth and glabrous, lateral surface with minute setigerous punctures as on anterior half of mesepisternum. Metasomal tergum I largely smooth and glabrous except some setigerous punctures anterolaterally and posteriorly; tergum II smooth with scattered, setigerous, postgradular punctures; terga III–VI smooth with more abundant and uniform setigerous punctures; sterna smooth to faintly coriarious with setigerous punctures in apical halves of discs, except sternum VI with more abundant and uniform postgradular setigerous punctures.
Integument generally yellowish orange to pale yellow (fig. 5), largely semitranslucent on mesosoma and portions of metasoma such that internal musculature can be observed in places; more brown on face above antennal toruli and between paraocular borders, apical half of pedicel, on vertex, uppermost gena, disc of mesoscutum, mesoscutellum, lower posterior mesepisternum, and ventral portion of metepisternum, with preaxilla, mesoscutellar crest, metanotum, and intercoxal region of metepisternum dark brown; wing veins pale yellow, membranes hyaline, clear.
Pubescence generally pale yellow to orange. Labrum with scattered elongate, erect, yellow setae; face with scattered minute, erect to suberect, yellow, simple setae; vertex posterior to ocelli with long, erect, simple setae; scape with minute, erect to suberect, simple setae, much shorter than diameter of scape; gena and postgena largely glabrous, except postgena with elongate, erect, simple, yellow setae bordering hypostomal fossa and long, erect, simple setae bordering occiput. Pronotum with numerous short, erect, fine, simple, white setae; mesoscutum with similar short setae as those on pronotum, intermixed with sparser elongate, erect, simple, white to yellowish setae; mesoscutellum with fine white setae slightly longer and sparser than those on mesoscutum, with elongate setae more numerous and somewhat longer, particularly along posterior border; metanotum with numerous exceptionally fine, short, white, simple setae; mesepisternum with short, erect, simple, yellowish setae, such setae becoming sparser posteriorly and slightly longer and paler ventrally, virtually glabrous posteriorly below hypoepimeral area; metepisternum virtually glabrous except with setae similar to mesepisternum in upper quarter near wing base; propodeum largely glabrous except laterally with scattered exceedingly fine, long, erect, simple, white setae, such setae more prominent around propodeal spiracle, with some longer, thicker, erect, simple, yellowish setae laterally bordering posterior surface. Setae of legs largely pale yellow to off-white; setae of tibiae and basitarsi particularly abundant; setae of metatibia long and rather uniformly distributed, those posteriorly greatly elongate; penicillum, rastellum, and parapenicillum absent (fig. 6C). Metasomal tergum I sparsely setose, with some fine, erect to suberect, simple, off-white setae laterally on upper anterior-facing surface; tergum II with abundant fine, erect to suberect, simple, off-white setae on postgradular disc, such setae slightly more numerous posteriorly than anteriorly and sparser basally and medially; terga III–V with uniformly dense fine, erect to suberect, simple, off-white setae forming distinctive setal mats; tergum VI with setae similar to preceding terga except slightly more spaced and gradually becoming thicker and greatly more elongate apically; sterna with sparse, long to elongate, erect, simple, yellowish to off-white setae in apical portions of discs; sternum VI with such setae more abundant somewhat longer and intermixed over entire disc with fine, short, erect, off-white setae.
Drone. Total body length 2.87–3.00 mm, forewing length (apex of costal sclerite to wing tip) 2.13–2.17 mm. Head wider than long, width 0.98–1.02 mm, length 0.83–0.90 mm; compound eye length 0.71–0.73 mm; upper interorbital distance 0.60–0.65 mm, lower interorbital distance 0.42–0.44 mm. Scape length 0.27–0.29 mm, much shorter than torulocellar distance, torulocellar distance 0.40–0.44 mm. Clypeus broader than long, approximately 1.8× as wide as long, length 0.21–0.24 mm, width 0.38–0.42 mm. Malar area linear, with mandibular base appearing to abut lower compound eye margin (fig. 8A). Metatibia 2.6–2.7× as long as wide (fig. 8B), length 0.77–0.78 mm, maximum width 0.28–0.30 mm; outer surface uniformly convex. Propodeum as in worker. Forewing as in worker except basal angle more acute, 73°, with R on wing margin beyond pterostigma slightly longer than marginal cell width at pterostigmal apex; hind wing with 5 distal hamuli. Modified sterna IV and V, hidden sterna VI and VII, and genital capsule as depicted in figure 9.
Integumental sculpturing as described for worker (fig. 7).
Coloration as described for worker except as follows: pale yellow on labiomaxillary complex, mandibles, and labrum (fig. 8A) (clypeus dark brown); antennal scape yellowish on lower surface and brown on much of upper surface; pedicel pale brown to brown; flagellum brown to dark brown. Pronotal collar brown to dark brown, with pronotal lobe yellow to pale brown (fig. 7A), sometimes with posterior borders and posterior dorsal ridge long mesoscutum yellow to pale brown; propleuron pale brown to brown; axilla dark brown to brown, mesoscutellum frequently lighter than axillae, brown to pale brown; metanotum brown to yellowish brown; procoxa, protrochanter, and profemur brown, protibia brown to light brown on outer surface and lighter basally and apically, with inner surface largely light brown to yellowish brown, protarsus yellow; midleg largely brown to dark brown except mesotrochanter lighter, mesofemur with light brown to yellowish-brown apex, mesobasitarsus dark brown to brown on outer surface except lighter basally and apically, with inner surface largely light brown to yellowish brown, mesotarsus yellow; hind leg largely brown to dark brown, except lighter on metatrochanter, yellowish brown to light brown at apex of metafemur, basally and apically on metatibia, and yellowish on metatarsus.
Pubescence as described for worker except as follows: metatibia with minute to short, decumbent to subappressed simple, silvery white to off-white setae on outer surface, except for nearly glabrous strip posteriorly from about midlength to apex, posterior to glabrous strip setae long, particularly along posterior margin, apical margin with a line of minute, fine, simple, silvery- to off-white setae; worker specializations (e.g., penicillus, rastellum, parapenicillus) absent. Metasoma sparsely setose; sternum III with small lunular patch of long, fine, yellow to off-white setae medially at apical margin, setae characteristically kinked medioposteriorly at apexes; sternum IV with larger lunular patch of similar setae medially at apical margin (figs. 7A, 8C, D), lunular patch proximally well separated from gradulus, surface of lunular patch more flattened than remainder of sternum, apical margin bordering lunular patch roughly straight; sternum V with similar lunular patch of setae encompassing majority of disc and proximally meeting gradulus (figs. 7A, 8C, D), proximal margin of lunular patch area slightly ridged and flattened relative to remainder of sternum, with apical margin of sternum broadly concave except short, medioapical projection; setae of gonostylus as depicted in figures 8C, 9C.
HOLOTYPE: ⚲, Colombia: La Guajira, Manaure, Pájaro, 11°31′43.91″N, 72°46′35.33″W, 20-xi-2016 [20 November 2016], M.S. Engel, V.H. Gonzalez, P. Sepúlveda, superior nest portion [taken from upper part of nest] (SEMC).
PARATYPES (280⚲⚲, 1♀, 25♂♂): Workers: 101⚲⚲, Colombia: La Guajira, Manaure, Pájaro, 11°31′43.91″N, 72°46′35.33″W, 20-xi-2016 [20 November 2016], M.S. Engel, V.H. Gonzalez, P. Sepúlveda, superior nest portion [taken from upper part of nest] (91⚲⚲ SEMC, 2⚲⚲ AMNH, 2⚲⚲ BBSL, 2⚲⚲ LABUN, 1⚲ ICNC, 2⚲⚲ PCYU, 1⚲ IIRB); 123⚲⚲, Colombia: La Guajira, Manaure, Pájaro, 11°31′43.91″N, 72°46′35.33″W, 20-xi-2016 [20 November 2016], M.S. Engel, V.H. Gonzalez, P. Sepúlveda, inferior nest portion [taken from lower part of nest] (115⚲⚲ SEMC, 1⚲ AMNH, 1⚲ LABUN, 2⚲⚲ LIPI, 1⚲ ICNC, 1⚲ IIRB, 2⚲⚲ ZMHB); 8⚲⚲, Colombia: La Guajira, Manaure, Pájaro, 11°31′43.91″N, 72°46′35.33″W, 18-xi-2016 [18 November 2016], M.S. Engel and V.H. Gonzalez, Trigonisca from nest entrance (SEMC); 21⚲⚲, Colombia: La Guajira, Manaure, Pájaro, 11°31′43.91″N, 72°46′35.33″W, 18-xi-2016 [18 November 2016], M.S. Engel and V.H. Gonzalez (SEMC); 4⚲⚲, Colombia: La Guajira, Manaure, Pájaro, 11°31′43.91″N, 72°46′35.33″W, 19-xi-2016 [19 November 2016], M.S. Engel and V.H. Gonzalez, ex: white pan trap (SEMC); 1⚲, Colombia: La Guajira, Maicao, Yutaho, 11°24′47.69″N, 72°24′28.32″W, 19-xi-2016 [19 November 2016], M.S. Engel, V.H. Gonzalez, P. Sepúlveda, ex: yellow pan trap (SEMC); 1⚲, Colombia: La Guajira, Maicao, Yutaho, 11°24′47.69″N, 72°24′28.32″W, 19-xi-2016 [19 November 2016], M.S. Engel, V.H. Gonzalez, P. Sepúlveda, ex: white pan trap (SEMC); 3⚲⚲, Colombia: La Guajira, Albania, Aulaulia, 11°20′15.28″N, 72°26′57.22″W, 19-xi-2016 [19 November 2016], M.S. Engel, V.H. Gonzalez, P. Sepúlveda (SEMC); 1⚲, Colombia: La Guajira, Albania, Aulaulia, 11°20′15.28″N, 72°26′57.22″W, 19-xi-2016 [19 November 2016], M.S. Engel, V.H. Gonzalez, P. Sepúlveda, ex: cactus nest (SEMC); 17⚲⚲, Colombia: La Guajira, Albania, Aulaulia, 11°20′15.28″N, 72°26′57.22″W, 19-xi-2016 [19 November 2016], M.S. Engel, V.H. Gonzalez, P. Sepúlveda, ex: double entrance nest (SEMC).
Queen: 1♀, Colombia: La Guajira, Manaure, Pájaro, 11°31′43.91″N, 72°46′35.33″W, 20-xi- 2016 [20 November 2016], M.S. Engel, V.H. Gonzalez, P. Sepúlveda, superior nest portion [taken from upper part of nest] (SEMC).
Drones: 23♂♂, Colombia: La Guajira, Manaure, Pájaro, 11°31′43.91″N, 72°46′35.33″W, 20-xi-2016 [20 November 2016], M.S. Engel, V.H. Gonzalez, P. Sepúlveda, superior nest portion [taken from upper part of nest] (19♂♂ SEMC, 1♂ BBSL, 1♂ LABUN, 1♂ PCYU, 1♂ IIRB); 2♂♂, Colombia: La Guajira, Manaure, Pájaro, 11°31′43.91″N, 72°46′35.33″W, 20-xi-2016 [20 November 2016], M.S. Engel, V.H. Gonzalez, P. Sepúlveda, inferior nest portion [taken from lower part of nest] (1♂ SEMC, 1♂ AMNH).
ETYMOLOGY: The epithet of this species is the local name in the Wayuunaiki language given by the Wayúu indigenous people of La Guajira, Colombia. The name is treated as a noun in apposition.
COMMENTS: Among the large series of paratype workers and drones there are included several callow individuals, exhibiting those variations typical of early integumental coloration right after emergence.
IMMATURE STAGES
Egg
Figure 10
No well-preserved eggs of T. mepecheu were discovered. However, much of a single damaged egg was identified and examined with an SEM (fig. 10A). It is obviously small and slender, and its posterior end appears to be slightly wider than the anterior one. At approximate midbody, its diameter measures 0.317 mm; its estimated length will probably be around 1.1 mm. Its chorionic surface pattern consists of elevated geometric figures (hexagons, pentagons, etc.: fig. 10) with the patterning becoming elongate where approaching the micropyle (fig. 10B, E). The egg’s posterior end was torn away so that it is uncertain whether it has any chorionic patterning.
MATERIAL STUDIED: One egg; same locality and date as holotype.
Mature Postdefecating Larva
Figures 11, 12
DIAGNOSIS: Like mature larvae of other Meliponini recently described, that of T. mepecheu exhibits (1) a mandible that tapers strongly to a narrow, slender apex, bearing sharp-pointed teeth and (2) most body segments each with a pair of dorsolateral tubercles. Furthermore, the first three body segments are robust and not attenuated, as they are in the Euglossini. As the smallest meliponine larva described so far, its size helps to distinguish it from most other tribal members. Its head in frontal view (fig. 12B) is extremely wide and flat and will probably be an identifying feature when mature larvae of other Meliponini are known.
DESCRIPTION: Head: Size moderate relative to body size (figs. 11, 12A); front of head in lateral profile relatively flat below narrow vertex, so that in oblique lateral view (fig. 12E) frons, clypeus, and labrum closely aligned; head capsule very broad (fig. 12D); vertex not bilobed in frontal view (fig. 12D). Condition of tentorium unknown; posterior tentorial pits normal in position; posterior thickening of head capsule narrow, scarcely bending forward medially as seen in dorsal view; internal coronal ridge absent; epistomal ridge on cleared head capsule evident from anterior mandibular articulation to anterior tentorial pit but fading out immediately mesad of anterior tentorial pits (fig. 12D: ATP); front of head capsule with transverse depression short distance above each antenna (fig. 12D, E, arrows); integument of head capsule mesad of each parietal band (fig. 12D) uneven presumably because of weak sclerotization. Parietal bands evident (fig. 12D, E). Antennal papilla (fig. 12D) circular at base, somewhat swollen but questionably conical in shape; papilla bearing perhaps 3–4 inconspicuous sensilla; papilla surrounded by membranous ring with radius about one-half basal diameter papilla. Vertex curved in lateral view; frontoclypeal area not projecting beyond labrum (fig. 12E); apical surface of labrum bearing extensive patch of elongate, multipronged spicules (fig. 12D, F, G) medially.
Mandibular apex pigmented; mandible (fig. 12D, F) slender, elongate, narrowing evenly from broad base to pointed apex; apical concavity a narrow, elongate flattened surface considerably longer than distance from mandibular base at base of cusp; dorsal edge of apical concavity with numerous long slender sharp teeth as seen in exterior view (fig. 12G: lower right corner); ventral edge smoother than dorsal edge; apex (fig. 12F) sharply pointed; cusp not projecting but inner surface uneven.
Labiomaxillary region variably projecting relative to head capsule in lateral view; labium and maxilla extending more or less equally in lateral view (fig. 11). Maxillary apex not bent mesad; palpus apical in position, more than twice as long as basal diameter; galea evident at maxillary apex, bearing several sensilla; articulating arm of stipes questionably present; basal articulation of stipes to cardo clearly defined; dorsal and inner apical surface of maxilla spiculate. Labium divided into prementum and postmentum, bearing apically projecting broad lips of slitlike salivary opening that is slightly shorter than distance between bases of labial palpi (fig. 12D); length of labial palpus about twice basal diameter. Hypopharynx spiculate.
Body: Dorsal integument of body from posterior margin of head toward posterior end more or less densely covered with fine spicules (figs. 11, 12A–C) that extend just laterad of each paired dorsal body tubercles (identified below); density of spicules gradually diminishing toward rear of abdomen. Each thoracic segment (figs. 11, 12A, B) with pair of small but distinct elevated dorsolateral tubercles on caudal annulet; abdominal segments 1–6 (figs. 11, 12A, C) also each with paired dorsolateral tubercles that become smaller and less pronounced toward posterior end of body. When larva cleared and stained with Chlorazol Black E, these tubercles positioned on paired, slightly elevated, transversely oblong stained surfaces of caudal annulets; abdominal segments 7, 8 with paired transverse oblong darkly stained areas lacking tubercles. Spiracles moderate in size, peritreme distinct; atrium shallow; atrial wall smooth or nearly so; primary tracheal opening a simple rim, smaller than atrial opening; subatrium moderately short consisting of about six annulations; flexure collapsed into single, long narrow tube.
MATERIAL STUDIED: 10+ postdefecating larvae; same locality and date as holotype.
COMMENTS: The SEM micrographs of this very small larva advances our knowledge concerning its anatomy, which in turn illuminates our understanding of the morphology of larval Meliponini. The front of the head in figure 12D is extremely broad relative to its length and quite flat. Its extensive width contrasts with the relatively restricted subtending mouthpart structures (mandibles, maxillae, and labium). The paired, nearly circular, domed antennae are clearly visible toward the center of the face, and a pair of dorsally converging, slitlike anterior tentorial pits (fig. 12D: ATP) can be identified mesad of and slightly below the level of the antennae. The extensive wrinkled area above each antenna extending almost to the dorsal edge of the head capsule suggests that the integument there is thin and yielding. In contrast, the smooth surface of the head capsule laterad of the mandibular bases is firm, thickly sclerotized as is the integument surrounding both anterior tentorial pits and the coronal midline of the head capsule. Although there is no internal epistomal ridge mesad the anterior tentorial pits nor an internal coronal ridge as often found in larval bees (e.g., Bombus impatiens Cresson, Rozen et al., 2018: fig. 54), the firm thickened integumental structure of these areas of the head capsule are still present. The two large integumental wrinkled areas laterad of the central coronal thickening occupy areas that are usually smooth curved surfaces on larvae of other bees (e.g., B. impatiens, Rozen et al., 2018: figs. 54, 55).
Another interesting feature exhibited in figure 12D is a fibrous patch centrally positioned on the lower apex of the labrum. When viewed under greater magnification (fig. 12F) it is seen to consist of long slender prongs branching from centrally clustered spicules surrounded by a dispersed field of nipplelike sensilla. From a more lateral orientation (fig. 12G), there is a suggestion that, in action, the upper serrated mandibular edge might possibly comb the prongs and thereby force food material into the buccal cavity. Observations of larger, live, related species perhaps might be able to explore the feeding action of mandibles and surrounding mouthparts in greater detail. The structure of these labral spicules is better understood and illustrated in Rozen et al. (2019: figs. 12–14) where each is seen to consist of a basal projection that divides into a transverse group of fine, tapering prongs. When these basal projections are very dense, they appear in some places to form a transverse ridge, as in the case of T. mepecheu (fig. 12G).
Because multipronged labral spicules certainly occur in Trigonisca, Plebeia Schwarz, and Melipona Illiger, it would not be surprising if other meliponines were found to have them.
NEST HABITS, ARCHITECTURE, AND ETHNOGRAPHIC DATA
NESTING HABITS: This species nests inside preexisting cavities in a wide range of substrates that included both natural and human-made constructions (figs. 13, 14). We found nests between 0.8 and 2 m above the ground (mean = 1.22 ± 0.46, N = 7), inside tombs of cemeteries, house walls, and both living and dead tree trunks. Most nests were inside tree trunks of living divi-divi trees (fig. 13) (Libidibia coriaria (Jacq.) Schltdl.; Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae: Caesalpinieae) that ranged in diameter from 8.0 to 20 cm (mean = 14.80 ± 5.17, N = 5). We found three nests inside a living Stenocereus griseus (Haw.) Buxb. (fig. 14A) (“Mexican organ pipe” cactus) (Cactaceae: Cactoideae: Pachycereeae), a columnar cactus (8–10 cm in diameter) widely used by the Wayúu people in La Guajira (Villalobos et al., 2007). We found three nests in the same tree trunk and one nest had two entrances (fig. 13B).
The nest entrance consisted of a hard, black wax tube that projected only slightly from the entrance (length 2.00–6.00 mm, mean = 4.25 ± 1.71, N = 4) (figs. 13, 14). The nest entrance was oval, with a length ranging from 5.00 to 8.00 mm (mean = 6.38 ± 0.92, N = 8) and width from 3.00 to 6.00 mm (mean = 4.13 ± 0.99, N = 8). Between 8 and 10 workers guarded the nest entrance (fig. 14B, C, E), which rapidly retreated when disturbed.
INTERNAL ARCHITECTURE: The nest was inside a living tree trunk of about 13 cm in diameter. It lacked of an involucrum and its brood cells were in clusters (figs. 15, 16), not in combs, inside an irregular cavity about 70 cm long and 0.4 to 3.9 cm wide (mean = 2.18 ± 1.41, N = 6). A drop of dark, sticky resin was near the nest entrance (fig. 16A). Pollen and honey pots were translucent brownish, were in the same cluster, either alone near the nest entrance or at the bottom of the cavity and mixed with brood cells (fig. 16). Pollen pots ranged from 3.02 to 4.04 mm in length (mean = 3.42 ± 0.24, N = 4) and 1.68 to 2.90 mm in diameter (mean = 2.30 ± 0.51, N = 4). Honey pots ranged from 3.16 to 5.30 mm in length (mean = 4.14 ± 0.62, N = 3) and 2.51 to 2.90 mm in diameter (mean = 2.64 ± 0.22, N = 3). The nest had at least 603 adults (some escaped during collection) and 1008 brood cells.
ETHNOGRAPHIC NOTES: This species is one of the two stingless bees we encountered in the localities around Riohacha that we visited, which the Wayúu people locally recognized as mepeche’u or mepeku. The other species is Melipona favosa (Fabricius) or mapa’a (fig. 17) (also spelled as mapa according to Álvarez, 2017: 217), which literally means “honey.” The Wayúu do not manage them, but they extract and consume the honey of the species whenever they find a nest. According to them, the honey is useful to treat the common cold and people can extract up to 3 L of honey from nests of M. favosa. Our youngest informant (6 years old) told us that his grandmother warns him not to drink the honey of T. mepecheu because of the risk of becoming blind. This is the first report of a species of Trigonisca producing injurious honey. We were unable to determine whether this knowledge stems from myth or cultural memory of an incident (or incidents) in the past whereby consumption of honey from T. mepecheu resulted in illness. Honey produced by generalist bees can change over and between seasons depending on what flowers are in bloom and from which of them the bees are harvesting nectar and pollen. The most infamous and historical example is the harvesting from rhododendrons by workers of Apis mellifera L. (e.g., the fifth-century BCE writer Xenophon [1998]; Radt, 2005; Gunduz et al., 2011), the result of which is a nocent honey (called in some regions, “mad honey”) that, when consumed, leads to serious medical complications and even death (Gunduz et al., 2006, 2008; Jansen et al., 2012; Sohn et al., 2014). Similarly, reports of nocuous honey from stingless bees are not unheard of (Schwarz, 1948; Lévi-Strauss, 1966, 1971), with particularly numerous indigenous accounts of toxic honey in the nests of Lestrimelitta limao (Smith) (reviewed by Schwarz, 1948). The consistent toxicity of honey by a robber bee such as L. limao seems to suggest that, at least in the case of this species, the bees themselves add some noxious secretions or selectively gather nectar from poisonous floral sources (Schwarz, 1948). Future research should explore the chemical and pollen composition of honey sampled from various nests of T. mepecheu to determine whether the honey is toxic and, if so, whether this is intermittently the case and from what floral source the poisons originate.
While we found more than a dozen nests of T. mepecheu, we found only three nests of M. favosa. These nests were at the base of large divi-divi trees (fig. 17) (30–40 cm in diameter) or in branches of about 26 cm in diameter at 2.2 m above ground. Melipona favosa builds its nest entrance with mud and typically consists of a single opening (~ 6 mm in diameter) to which a series of distinctive striations converged (fig. 17A). The Wayúu also use the propolis of M. favosa, which they boil in water and then drink the mixture in order to treat seizures or tremors.
The Wayúu also recognized the exotic honey bee, A. mellifera, which is named either mapa’a apricana or ko’oiyosu. In some literature, honey bees are sometimes referred to as ko’oi only. However, we confirmed that people refer with this name to a honey wasp (Vespidae: Brachygastra sp.), which the Wayúu from the Sijuana caste in the Upper Guajira considered their ancestor (Freyle et al., 2003). For the Wayúu, other bees such as carpenter bees (Apidae: Xylocopa spp.), are not included in the same category with stingless bees because they do not make honey. This folk taxonomy resembles that of the Mixtec of Mexico (Gonzalez et al., 2018).
description: Published as part of Engel, Michael S., Rozen, Jerome G., Sepúlveda-Cano, Paula A., Smith, Corey Shepard, Thomas, Jennifer C., Ospina-Torres, Rodulfo & Gonzalez, Victor H., 2019, Nest Architecture, Immature Stages, and Ethnoentomology of a New Species of Trigonisca from Northern Colombia (Hymenoptera: Apidae), pp. 1 in American Museum Novitates 2019 (3942) on page 1, DOI: 10.1206/3942.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5370200