Caupolicana (Zikanapis) rozenorum Michener, Engel &amp; Ayala
Creators: name: Michener, Charles
name: Engel, Michael
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2009
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Arthropoda
Insecta
Hymenoptera
Colletidae
Caupolicana
Caupolicana rozenorum

description: <i>Caupolicana</i> (<i>Zikanapis</i>) <i>rozenorum</i> Michener, Engel &amp; Ayala (Figs. 1-2) <i>Caupolicana</i> (<i>Zikanapis</i>) <i>rozenorum</i> Michener et al., 2003: 169. <b>New records.</b> One male, one female from Guatemala: Guatemala Province: Puerta Parada, IX-5-8-2001 (J. Schuster) [FSCA]; two males, same locality and collector, 1900 m, VII-16-2002 and XI-6-13-2003 [UVGC]; one female, same locality and collector, 1860 m, IV-11-18-2004 [UVGC]; two females from same locality and collector, in malaise trap, VIII-25 to IX-1, 2007 [KSEM]. Two females, Suchitepéquez Province: Los Tamales, Volcán Atitlán, 800-1000 m, IX-24-26-2006 (J.B. Heppner) [KSEM]. One male, same province, Santa Barbara, Res. Refuío Quetzal, 1600 m, VI-27-2007 [UVGC]. One male, Baja Verapáz Province: Salama, camino Pantína Santa Rosa, 1700 m, VI-10-15-2007 (Monzón y Camposecu) [UVGC]. One male, San Marcos Province: San Rafael Pie de la Cuesta, camino a aldea El Bojonal, 1600 m, V-24-2005 (J.M. Sierra) [UVGC]; one male, same but camino de Frater-Bojonal, 1600 m, V-26-2006 [UVGC]. One female, Quetzaltenango Province: Palmar Viejo, finca El Faro, 1400 m, III-16-17-1997 (Rodriguez y Taracena) [UVGC]. One female, El Salvador: San Vicente: Volcán San Vicente, finca El Carmen, 1400 m, IX-14-2006, at mercury vapor light (E. Cano and J. Schuster) [UVGC]. One female, Costa Rica: Guanacaste Province: Estación Cacao, 2 km SW of Cerro Cacao, 1100 m, II-7-18-1995 (M. Chinchilla) [FSCA]. One female, same locality, southwest side of Cerro Cacao, 1000-1400 m, March 1988 [KSEM]. <b>Comments.</b> This species was originally described (Michener et al., 2003) on the basis of four males from three different localities in Costa Rica. Two females from one of these localities were considered possibly <i>C</i>. <i>rozenorum</i> and their characters were noted. We now have males and females from a locality in Guatemala as listed above. These females appear to be the same species as the females noted in 2003, supporting the tentative association of sexes. Additional females from localities in Guatemala, San Salvador, and Costa Rica were not taken with males. The data for these specimens are listed above. <b>Comparisons.</b> The following paragraphs list differences between <i>C</i>. <i>rozenorum</i> and <i>C</i>. <i>inbio</i>. Male: <i>Caupolicana rozenorum</i> and <i>C</i>. <i>inbio</i> are noteworthy because of the very striking difference in the metatibial shape and setation (see above key and figures 21 and 22 in Michener et al., 2003) but near absence of other differences. The differentiating characters other than the metatibia listed in the original description of the male of <i>C</i>. <i>rozenorum</i> are not reliable. The middle flagellar segments of <i>C</i>. <i>inbio</i> are sometimes about 1.5 times as long as broad as described for <i>C</i>. <i>rozenorum</i>. The punctures on the shining central part of the lower half of the clypeus are more widely scattered in <i>C</i>. <i>rozenorum</i> than in the available specimens of <i>C</i>. <i>inbio</i>, but the difference is not impressive and intergradation is probable. The integument is generally paler in <i>C</i>. <i>inbio</i> than in <i>C</i>. <i>rozenorum</i>; thus the flagellum is brown to blackish, darker above than below, in <i>C</i>. <i>inbio</i> whereas it is blackish, dark brown below, in <i>C</i>. <i>rozenorum</i>. Moreover, the legs are brown with the metabasitarsus yellowish in <i>C</i>. <i>inbio</i>, whereas the legs including the metabasitarsus are dark brown in <i>C</i>. <i>rozenorum</i>. The setae on the outer surfaces of the meso- and metatibiae are mostly pale in <i>C</i>. <i>inbio</i>, mostly somewhat dusky in <i>C</i>. <i>rozenorum</i>, the darkness varying with the angle of illumination. The supposed difference in dark apices of the mesosomal pile does not exist. An additional apparent difference is in the ocellocular distance, which, although given as 0.15 OD for both species in the original descriptions, seems to be less in <i>C</i>. <i>rozenorum</i>; this apparently does not apply to all specimens. Female: Length 17-21 mm (averaging slightly smaller than <i>C</i>. <i>inbio</i>); forewing length 11-13 mm. Upper interorbital distance about 3 OD; lower interorbital distance about 5 OD; interocellar distance about 1 OD; ocellocular distance about 0.5 OD; other measurements approximately as recorded for <i>C</i>. <i>inbio</i>. Clypeus broadly convex without weak longitudinal depression on each side of weak median longitudinal area as found in <i>C</i>. <i>inbio</i>. Inner metatibial spur with 17 or 18 large teeth (not counting small basal teeth and preapical tooth sometimes present). Integument including metatarsus largely black but pro- and mesofemora and tibiae with brownish areas; pygidial plate medially dark brown. Setae of tarsi largely fuscous although with yellowish reflections. Pile of mesosomal dorsum and T1 usually darker than in <i>C</i>. <i>inbio</i> because of black or dusky apical parts of setae.
description: Published as part of <i>Michener, Charles &amp; Engel, Michael, 2009, Caupolicana in Central America (Hymenoptera, Colletidae, Diphaglossinae), pp. 53-64 in ZooKeys 5 (5)</i> on pages 55-57, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.5.76, http://zenodo.org/record/576430
description: {"references": ["Michener CD, Engel MS, Ayala R (2003) The bee genus Caupolicana in Central America (Hymenoptera: Colletidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 76 (2): 160 - 171."]}