Hudiesaurus sinojapanorum Dong 1997
Creators: name: Upchurch, Paul
name: Mannion, Philip D.
name: Xu, Xing
name: Barrett, Paul M.
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2021
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Reptilia
Dinosauria
Mamenchisauridae
Hudiesaurus
Hudiesaurus sinojapanorum

description: <i>HUDIESAURUS SINOJAPANORUM</i> Dong, 1997 (Figs. 2–4) <b>Original Diagnosis</b> <i>—</i> Re-written from Dong (1997:102): (1) top of neural spine of anterior dorsal vertebra forms a ‘U’-shaped shallow cleft; (2) wing-like process between bases of postzygapophyses and lateral margin of neural spine; (3) anteriorly directed laterally compressed ‘sword-like’ process on anterior face of neural spine; (4) deep pleurocoels on lateral faces of the centrum; (5) midline keel on the ventral surface of the centrum. <b>Comments on Original Diagnosis</b> <i>—</i> The original diagnosis provided by Dong (1997) can now be shown to be inadequate. Putative autapomorphies 1, 4, and 5 are present in several other sauropod genera. For example, shallow ‘U’-shaped bifurcation of the posterior cervical and anterior dorsal neural spines also occurs in <i>Mamenchisaurus</i> (Young and Chao, 1972), <i>Klamelisaurus</i> (Zhao, 1993; Moore et al., 2020), <i>Euhelopus</i> (Wiman, 1929; Wilson and Upchurch, 2009), several turiasaurians (Royo-Torres et al., 2006, 2017; Britt et al., 2017), <i>Camarasaurus</i> (Osborn and Mook, 1921; Gilmore, 1925), and <i>Opisthocoelicaudia</i> (Borsuk-Bia&amp;lstrok;ynicka, 1977), among others. Deep lateral pneumatic openings (= ‘pleurocoels’) are widespread in the presacral centra of many eusauropods (Upchurch et al., 2004a), and a ventral keel is also present in the cervicodorsal region of several other taxa, including <i>Mamenchisaurus hochuanensis</i> (CCG V 20401; PU and PMB pers. observ. 2010), <i>Klamelisaurus</i> (Moore et al., 2020), and <i>Euhelopus</i> (Wilson and Upchurch, 2009). It is not entirely clear what Dong (1997) meant by the ‘wing-like’ processes (putative autapomorphy ‘2’), as their location was neither fully described nor annotated in his figures. However, it seems likely that these are merely the typical posterolateral projection of the postzygapophyses, rather than unusual processes. Finally, the ‘sword-like’ anterior process is not part of a novel articulation with the hyposphene of a preceding vertebra (contra Dong, 1997: see Description, below); rather, it appears to be a transversely compressed sheet of ossified intervertebral ligament. Ossification of such ligaments and tendons is rare, but not unheard of, among sauropods (e.g., <i>Camarasaurus</i> [= ‘ <i>Cathetosaurus</i> ’] <i>lewisi</i> [Jensen, 1988]; <i>Diplodocus</i> [USNM 10865; Gilmore, 1932; PU pers. observ., 1991]; see also Cerda, 2009; Klein et al., 2012; Cerda et al., 2015). Thus, the presence of such a feature is more likely to represent individual variation, pathology, and/or unusual preservation, rather than an autapomorphy. If this feature is to be accepted as having some diagnostic value, this must wait until it is found repeatedly in other individuals of <i>Hudiesaurus</i>. <b>Revised Diagnosis</b> <i>—Hudiesaurus</i> can be diagnosed on the basis of the following autapomorphies: (1) small projection on neurocentral junction above lateral pneumatic opening; (2) ACDL splits into upper and lower branches (the former extends to anterodorsal margin of the diapophysis, and the latter to posteroventral margin of the diapophysis, where it meets the anterior end of the PCDL); (3) approximately transverse row of 5–6 small coels on dorsal surface of prezygapophyseal process, immediately posterior to articular facet; (4) SPRLs bifurcate close to the base of the metapophysis, with one branch extending up anterior surface and fading out before reaching the summit, and the other branch forming a thin sheet that extends along the anterolateral margin of the metapophysis to the summit; and (5) SPOL bifurcates into two distinct ridges immediately above postzygapophysis (or this could be described as a short lamina extending dorsomedially from the PODL to the SPOL). N.B., portions of the PRDLs and diapophyses have been heavily restored with plaster, so autapomorphy 2 should be treated with caution. <b>Holotype</b> <i>—</i> A nearly complete vertebra from the cervicodorsal region (estimated to be the last cervical vertebra; IVPP V11120) (Figs. 2–4; Table 1). N.B., Dong (1997) identified this specimen as an anterior dorsal vertebra, but we regard it as being more probably a posterior cervical vertebra (see below). <b>Locality and Horizon</b> <i>—</i> Lower part of the Kalazha Formation (Upper Jurassic: upper Kimmeridgian–Tithonian) of Qiketai, Shanshan County, Turpan Basin, Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, China (Dong, 1997; Deng et al., 2015; Fang et al., 2016; Fig. 1). Description and Comparisons Dong (1997) identified the holotype of <i>Hudiesaurus</i> as an anterior dorsal vertebra; however, it also resembles a posteriormost cervical vertebra in several features. Even with well-preserved presacral series, it is often difficult to define the point where the neck meets the trunk in sauropods: this is because the morphology of the posterior cervical vertebrae gradually transforms into that of the most anterior dorsal vertebrae (Wilson and Upchurch, 2009; Moore et al., 2020). Despite some occasional doubts and apparent inconsistencies, we have generally accepted the identifications of the cervical-dorsal junction proposed by previous workers for other taxa. However, in the case of <i>Mamenchisaurus hochuanensis</i> (CCG V 20401), we note that the suggested 19 cervical and 12 dorsal vertebrae (Young and Chao, 1972) is likely to be incorrect. This is because ‘Dv2’ possesses a hyposphene (PU and PMB pers. observ., 2010), which would be atypical for such an anterior dorsal vertebra: a hyposphene does not usually appear until Dv3 or Dv4 in sauropods (Upchurch et al., 2004a). We therefore propose provisionally that <i>Mamenchisaurus hochuanensis</i> had 18 cervical and 13 dorsal vertebrae. Given the difficulties of pinpointing the cervical-dorsal junction in even well preserved and complete presacral series, identifying the precise position of an isolated vertebra (such as <i>Hudiesaurus</i>) is even more problematic. Below, we compare the <i>Hudiesaurus</i> vertebra with both the posterior cervical and anterior dorsal vertebrae of other sauropods. The majority of features support a position as either the last cervical or the first dorsal vertebra, with the former being more probable based on some features that are uniquely shared by <i>Hudiesaurus</i> and the last cervical vertebra (Cv18) of <i>Xinjiangtitan</i>. This identification, of course, depends on the assumption that Zhang et al. (2020) were correct when they placed the cervical-dorsal junction of <i>Xinjiangtitan</i> between the 18th and 19th presacral vertebrae (counting from the head). The <i>Hudiesaurus</i> vertebra is relatively complete, although the PRDLs and transverse processes have been partly reconstructed (see also Dong, 1997). As in the cervical and anterior dorsal vertebrae of most eusauropods, it has a strongly opisthocoelous centrum (Dong, 1997) (Fig. 2), differing from the amphiplatyan/amphicoelous presacral vertebrae of most non-gravisaurian sauropodomorphs (Upchurch, 1995; Wilson, 2002; Upchurch et al., 2007a; Yates, 2007; Allain and Aquesbi, 2008; McPhee et al., 2014). In anterior or posterior view, the centrum is subcircular in outline, being slightly wider transversely than dorsoventrally (Table 1), as is typical for the cervicodorsal vertebrae of neosauropods (Mannion et al., 2019a) and some earlier-branching forms such as <i>Qijianglong</i>, <i>Mamenchisaurus youngi</i>, and <i>Bellusaurus</i> (Moore et al., 2020 and references therein). This contrasts with the transversely compressed middle–posterior cervical centra of many other East Asian eusauropods, including <i>Shunosaurus</i>, <i>Erketu</i>, <i>Euhelopus</i>, <i>Mamenchisaurus hochuanensis</i> (CCG V 20401), and <i>Xinjiangtitan</i> (Upchurch, 1998; Mannion et al., 2013; Moore et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020; PU and PMB pers. observ., 2010), as well as most rebbachisaurids (Mannion et al., 2019a). The Functional (i.e., excluding the anterior convexity) Average Elongation Index (FAEI) is 1.0 in the <i>Hudiesaurus</i> vertebra. FAEIs tend to decrease towards the cervical-dorsal junction compared with those for middle cervical vertebrae, and a value close to 1.0 is compatible with a position either as the last cervical or one of the first two dorsal vertebrae of a non-diplodocine sauropod (Table S1 in Supplemental Data 1). As in <i>Mamenchisaurus hochuanensis</i> (CCG V 20401; PU and PMB pers. observ., 2010), <i>Klamelisaurus</i> (Moore et al., 2020; contra Zhao, 1993), <i>Euhelopus</i> (Wilson and Upchurch, 2009), and many flagellicaudatans (Upchurch et al., 2004a), the ventral surface of the <i>Hudiesaurus</i> centrum is strongly concave transversely as well as anteroposteriorly over its whole length, and is bounded by ventrolaterally directed ridges (Dong, 1997). A prominent midline ridge is present within the ventral concavity, as also found in dicraeosaurids (Upchurch, 1998; Wilson, 2002), Cv17–Dv1 of <i>Euhelopus</i> (Wilson and Upchurch, 2009), posterior cervicals to Dv2 in <i>Klamelisaurus</i> (Moore et al., 2020), Cv13–18 in <i>Xinjiangtitan</i> (Zhang et al., 2020), and Dv1 (= ‘Cv19’) in <i>Mamenchisaurus hochuanensis</i> (CCG V 20401; PU and PMB pers. observ., 2010). The parapophysis is located at the anteroventral corner of the lateral surface of the centrum (Fig. 2). This position is typical for sauropod cervical vertebrae, although it also occurs in Dv1 in most taxa (Upchurch et al., 2004a), including <i>Klamelisaurus</i> (Moore et al., 2020), <i>Mamenchisaurus hochuanensis</i> (CCG V 20401; PU and PMB pers. observ., 2010), and <i>Xinjiangtitan</i> (Zhang et al., 2020), and in Dv1 and 2 in <i>Euhelopus</i> (Wilson and Upchurch, 2009) and <i>Apatosaurus ajax</i> (Upchurch et al., 2004b). In <i>Hudiesaurus</i>, there is no indication that the shallowly concave articular surface of the parapophysis was fused to a rib: this is more consistent with this specimen being a dorsal, rather than cervical, vertebra (Hatcher, 1901; Gilmore, 1936; McIntosh, 1990; Upchurch, 1998; Upchurch et al., 2004a; Zhang et al., 2020). However, rib–vertebra fusion is not an infallible indicator that a vertebra is a cervical (Moore et al., 2020): for example, the ribs of Cv17 and 18 of <i>Mamenchisaurus hochuanensis</i> (CCG V 20401) are not fused to the parapophyses (PU and PMB pers. observ., 2010). The dorsal surface of the parapophysis is excavated in <i>Hudiesaurus</i>, and this depression is continuous with the lateral pneumatic opening, as seen in the cervical vertebrae of many non-neosauropod eusauropods, such as <i>Cetiosaurus</i> and <i>Chebsaurus</i> (Upchurch and Martin, 2002, 2003; Upchurch et al., 2004a; Mahammed et al., 2005). Many neosauropods also have dorsally excavated cervical parapophyses, but such taxa typically possess a ridge that divides this depression from the lateral pneumatic opening (Upchurch, 1998; Upchurch and Martin, 2002, 2003). The lateral pneumatic opening of <i>Hudiesaurus</i> is small and deep, with a rounded, wide anterior margin that is positioned dorsal to the parapophysis (Fig. 2). Posteriorly, this opening is bounded dorsally by a sharp ridge that runs posteroventrally, giving the posterior margin an acute profile. Such a ridge is unusual in sauropods, only being reported previously in Cv17 and 18 of <i>Xinjiangtitan</i> (Zhang et al., 2020:figs. 15, 16, and 18), and confirmed as absent in <i>Mamenchisaurus youngi</i> by the latter study. Dorsal vertebrae 1 and 2 of <i>Apatosaurus ajax</i> have a ridge bounding the lateral pneumatic opening dorsally (Upchurch et al., 2004b), but this differs from the condition in <i>Hudiesaurus</i> and <i>Xinjiangtitan</i> by extending further anteriorly (i.e., to the anterior end of the opening) and being horizontal rather than posteroventrally inclined. In <i>Hudiesaurus</i>, this ridge merges into the centrum-arch junction, where there is a small, laterally extending projection on each side (Fig. 2): the latter is unique and is regarded as an autapomorphy. The presence of lateral pneumatic openings with oval outlines (i.e., strongly rounded and dorsoventrally wide anterior margins and acute posterior ends) in anterior dorsal vertebrae has frequently been regarded as a derived character state uniting Macronaria or a slightly less inclusive clade (e.g., Upchurch, 1998; Mannion et al., 2013). However, they are also seen in Dv1 and 2 of <i>Klamelisaurus</i> (Moore et al., 2020), the anterior dorsal vertebrae of <i>Bellusaurus</i> and <i>Haplocanthosaurus priscus</i> (Mannion et al., 2019a), and indeterminate cervicodorsal vertebrae from the Late Jurassic Shishugou Formation of China (Moore et al., 2020). In <i>Hudiesaurus</i>, the lateral pneumatic opening is not as elongate as those found in either the cervical centra of <i>Cetiosaurus</i> (Upchurch and Martin, 2002) or several Jurassic Chinese taxa (such as <i>Dashanpusaurus</i> and <i>Daanosaurus</i>; Peng et al., 2005; Ye et al., 2005). Indeed, <i>Hudiesaurus</i> possesses a lateral pneumatic opening that is largely restricted to the anterior two-thirds of the centrum (excluding the anterior articular convexity), a derived condition seen in the cervical vertebrae of many CMTs (e.g., <i>Klamelisaurus</i>, <i>Mamenchisaurus youngi</i>, <i>Qijianglong</i>, <i>Xinjiangtitan</i>), <i>Euhelopus</i>, and several titanosauriforms (Whitlock, 2011; Moore et al., 2020). However, the relatively small size and anterior location of the lateral pneumatic opening is also consistent with the <i>Hudiesaurus</i> vertebra being from the anterior dorsal region. The oblique accessory lamina that divides the lateral pneumatic opening into anterior and posterior sections in the cervical vertebrae of several non-neosauropod eusauropods (e.g., <i>Mamenchisaurus</i>, <i>Klamelisaurus, Xinjiangtitan</i>) and many neosauropods (Wilson, 2002; Upchurch et al., 2004a; Moore et al., 2020) is not present in <i>Hudiesaurus</i> (Fig. 2). While its absence is more compatible with an identification of the <i>Hudiesaurus</i> specimen as being an anterior dorsal vertebra, the oblique lamina is also sometimes absent in posterior-most cervical vertebrae, such as Cv18 of <i>Mamenchisaurus hochuanensis</i> (CCG V 20401; PU and PMB pers. observ., 2010), Cv17 and 18 of <i>Xinjiangtitan</i> (Zhang et al., 2020), and Cv17 of <i>Euhelopus</i> (Wilson and Upchurch, 2009). The lateral pneumatic opening becomes shallower posteriorly in <i>Hudiesaurus</i>, as is typical for most sauropod cervical vertebrae (e.g., <i>Cetiosaurus</i>, <i>Patagosaurus</i>, and the CCG V 20401 specimen of <i>Mamenchisaurus hochuanensis</i>: Bonaparte, 1986; Upchurch and Martin, 2002, 2003; PU and PMB pers. observ., 2010). Measured on the anterior surface, the ratio of the dorsoventral height of the neural arch (from the dorsal surface of the centrum to the ventromedial tips of the prezygapophyses) to centrum height is low (∼0.35) in <i>Hudiesaurus</i>. With the exception of comparably low neural arches in some somphospondylans and <i>Omeisaurus tianfuensis</i>, this ratio is ≥0.5 in the posterior cervical vertebrae of other eusauropods (Bonaparte et al., 2006; Mannion et al., 2013). In <i>Hudiesaurus</i>, the prezygapophyses project forward to a point beyond the anterior end of the condyle (Fig. 2). Such projection is typical for the posterior cervical and anterior dorsal vertebrae of many sauropods: for example, in <i>Klamelisaurus</i> it is only posterior to Dv5 that the prezygapophyses no longer project beyond the anterior articulation of the centrum (Moore et al., 2020). However, this contrasts with the condition in taxa like <i>Apatosaurus ajax</i>, where the prezygapophyses no longer project beyond the anterior end of the centrum from Cv12 rearwards (Upchurch et al., 2004b). In <i>Hudiesaurus</i>, the prezygapophyses are large and broad, with transversely convex articular surfaces (Fig. 3A). Sauropods typically have flat prezygapophyseal articular surfaces plesiomorphically, but the derived, strongly convex condition is also present in the cervical vertebrae of diplodocines (Upchurch, 1995; Tschopp et al., 2015a) and the CMTs <i>Klamelisaurus</i> (Moore et al., 2020) and <i>Xinjiangtitan</i> (Zhang et al., 2020), as well as the anterior dorsal vertebrae of <i>Mamenchisaurus hochuanensis</i> (CCG V 20401; PU and PMB pers. observ., 2010). The zygapophyses have several small, irregularly shaped coels on their dorsal surfaces (Dong, 1997). In the case of the prezygapophyses, these coels form a line of 5–6 adjacent pits, separated from each other by small anteroposteriorly directed ridges, located immediately posterior to the articular facet (Fig. 3A). These might represent a pneumatized internal tissue structure that has been revealed by erosion of the surface bone: however, their presence in the same position on both prezygapophyses suggests that they are not taphonomic artifacts. We therefore regard these coels as external pneumatic features and as autapomorphic for <i>Hudiesaurus</i>. The thin, medial edges of the prezygapophyses descend steeply to meet each other on the midline and form a single lamina extending down to the top of the small, subcircular neural canal (Fig. 2C); this is probably the “well developed medial lamina” of Dong (1997:103), here termed the interprezygapophyseal lamina (TPRL) according to a revised version of Wilson’ s (1999) system (see Tschopp and Mateus, 2013). This TPRL partially subdivides the centroprezygapophyseal fossa (CPRF) into left and right subfossae. A TPRL is absent from the posterior cervical vertebrae of <i>Euhelopus</i> (Wilson and Upchurch, 2009) and <i>Xinjiangtitan</i> (Zhang et al., 2020), and the anterior dorsal vertebrae of <i>Klamelisaurus</i> and <i>Mamenchisaurus youngi</i> (Moore et al., 2020), although it is present in several other sauropods (e.g., there is a short, stout version on the posterior cervical vertebrae of <i>Apatosaurus ajax</i>; Upchurch et al., 2004b). The centroprezygapophyseal laminae (CPRLs) of <i>Hudiesaurus</i> are large and stout (as in <i>Cetiosaurus</i>; Upchurch and Martin, 2003) and do not bifurcate at their dorsal ends, unlike those of the cervical vertebrae of several diplodocids (Upchurch, 1998) and many non-neosauropod eusauropods (Moore et al., 2020), such as those on Cv18 in <i>Xinjiangtitan</i> (Zhang et al., 2020). The stout, single CPRLs of <i>Hudiesaurus</i> more closely resemble those of anterior dorsal vertebrae in taxa such as <i>Klamelisaurus</i>, although the former lacks the accessory laminae seen in the PRCDF of the latter taxon (Moore et al., 2020). In lateral view, the CPRLs slope anterodorsally and are subparallel with the PCDLs (Fig. 2A, B), a configuration also seen in the cervical and anterior-most dorsal vertebrae (i.e., Dv1 and 2) of many sauropods. By contrast, in Dv3 and 4 of most taxa, these laminae become more vertical, and are fully vertical from around Dv5 onwards, as seen in <i>Klamelisaurus</i> (Moore et al., 2020). Thus, the orientation of the CPRLs further supports the view that the <i>Hudiesaurus</i> vertebra is either a cervical or one of the most anterior dorsal vertebrae. As in the cervical vertebrae of some non-neosauropod eusauropods (including <i>Shunosaurus</i>, <i>Omeisaurus tianfuensis</i>, <i>Chuanjiesaurus</i>, and <i>Cetiosaurus</i>) and many diplodocoids, pre-epipophyses are absent in <i>Hudiesaurus</i>. This contrasts with most CMTs, such as <i>Klamelisaurus</i> and <i>Mamenchisaurus youngi</i>, as well as <i>Bellusaurus</i>, <i>Euhelopus</i>, and many other neosauropods, in which these projections ar
description: Published as part of <i>Upchurch, Paul, Mannion, Philip D., Xu, Xing &amp; Barrett, Paul M., 2021, Re-assessment of the Late Jurassic eusauropod dinosaur Hudiesaurus sinojapanorum Dong, 1997, from the Turpan Basin, China, and the evolution of hyper-robust antebrachia in sauropods, pp. 1-31 in Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology (e 1994414) (e 1994414) 41 (4)</i> on pages 3-9, DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2021.1994414, http://zenodo.org/record/5839134
description: {"references": ["Dong, Z. 1997. A gigantic sauropod (Hudiesaurus sinojapanorum, gen. et sp. nov.) from the Turpan Basin, China; pp. 102 - 110 in Z. Dong (ed.), Sino-Japanese Silk Road Dinosaur Expedition. China Ocean Press, Beijing.", "Young, C. C., and X. - J. Chao. 1972. Mamenchisaurus hochuanensis sp. nov. Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology Monographs (Series A) 8: 1 - 30.", "Zhao, X. - J. 1993. [A new mid-Jurassic sauropod (Klamelisaurus gobiensis gen. et sp. nov.) from Xinjiang, China]. Vertebrata PalAsiatica 31: 132 - 138. [In Chinese with English summary]", "Moore, A. J., P. Upchurch, P. M. Barrett, J. M. Clark, and X. Xu. 2020. Osteology of Klamelisaurus gobiensis (Dinosauria: Eusauropoda) and the evolutionary history of Middle - Late Jurassic Chinese sauropods. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 18: 1299 - 1393.", "Wiman, C. 1929. Die Kriede-Dinosaurier aus Shantung. Palaeontologia Sinica Series C 6: 1 - 67.", "Wilson, J. A., and P. Upchurch. 2009. Redescription and reassessment of the phylogenetic affinities of Euhelopus zdanskyi (Dinosauria: Sauropoda) from the Early Cretaceous of China. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 7: 199 - 239.", "Royo-Torres, R., A. Cobos, and L. Alcala. 2006. A giant European dinosaur and a new sauropod clade. Science 314: 1925 - 1927.", "Royo-Torres, R., P. Upchurch, J. I. Kirkland, D. D. DeBlieux, J. R. Foster, A. Cobos, and L. Alcala. 2017. Descendants of the Jurassic turiasaurs from Iberia found refuge in the Early Cretaceous of western USA. Scientific Reports 7: 14311. doi. org / 10.1038 / s 41598 - 017 - 14677 - 2", "Britt, B. B., R. D. Scheetz, M. F. Whiting, and D. R. Wilhite. 2017. Moabosaurus utahensis, n. gen., n. sp., a new sauropod from the Early Cretaceous (Aptian) of North America. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan 32: 189 - 243.", "Osborn, H. F., and C. C. Mook. 1921. Camarasaurus, Amphicoelias, and other sauropods of Cope. Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History, New Series 3: 247 - 387.", "Gilmore, C. W. 1925. A nearly complete articulated skeleton of Camarasaurus, a saurischian dinosaur from the Dinosaur National Monument. Memoirs of the Carnegie Museum 10: 347 - 384.", "Upchurch, P., P. M. Barrett, and P. Dodson. 2004 a. Sauropoda; pp. 259 - 324 in D. B. Weishampel, P. Dodson, and H. Osmolska, (eds.), The Dinosauria (Second Edition). University of California Press, Berkeley.", "Jensen, J. A. 1988. A fourth new sauropod dinosaur from the Upper Jurassic of the Colorado Plateau and sauropod bipedalism. Great Basin Naturalist 48: 121 - 145.", "Gilmore, C. W. 1932. On a newly mounted skeleton of Diplodocus in the United States National Museum. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 81: 1 - 21.", "Cerda, I. A. 2009. Consideraciones sobre la histogenesis de las costillas cervicales en los dinosaurios sauropodos. Ameghiniana 46: 193 - 198.", "Klein, N., A. Christian, and P. M. Sander. 2012. Histology shows that elongated neck ribs in sauropod dinosaurs are ossified tendons. Biology Letters 8: 1032 - 1035.", "Cerda, I. A., G. A. Casal, R. D. Martinez, and L. M. Ibiricu. 2015. Histological evidence for a supraspinous ligament in sauropod dinosaurs. Royal Society Open Science 2: 150369. doi. org / 10.1098 / rsos. 150369", "Deng, S., S. Wang, Z. Yang, Y. Lu, X. Li, Q. Hu, C. An, D. Xi, and X. Wan. 2015. Comprehensive study of the Middle-Upper Jurassic strata in the Junggar Basin, Xinjiang. Acta Geoscientia Sinica 36: 559 - 574.", "Fang, Y., C. Wu, Y. Wang, L. Wang, Z. Guo, and H. Hu. 2016. Stratigraphic and sedimentary characteristics of the Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous strata in the Junggar Basin, Central Asia: tectonic and climate implications. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 129: 294 - 308.", "Zhang, X. - Q., D. - Q. Li, Y. Xie, and H. - L. You. 2020. Redescription of the cervical vertebrae of the mamenchisaurid sauropod Xinjiangtitan shanshanesis Wu et al. 2013. Historical Biology 32 (6): 802 - 822.", "Upchurch, P. 1995. The evolutionary history of sauropod dinosaurs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 349: 365 - 390.", "Wilson, J. A. 2002. Sauropod dinosaur phylogeny: critique and cladistic analysis. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 136: 217 - 276.", "Upchurch, P., P. M. Barrett, and P. M. Galton. 2007 a. A phylogenetic analysis of basal sauropodomorph relationships: implications for the origin of sauropod dinosaurs. Special Papers in Palaeontology 77: 57 - 90.", "Yates, A. M. 2007. The first complete skull of the Triassic dinosaur Melanorosaurus Haughton (Sauropodomorpha: Anchisauria). Special Papers in Palaeontology 77: 9 - 55.", "Allain, R., and N. Aquesbi. 2008. Anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of Tazoudasaurus naimi (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) from the late Early Jurassic of Morocco. Geodiversitas 30: 345 - 424.", "McPhee, B. W., A. M. Yates, J. N. Choiniere, and F. Abdala, 2014. The complete anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of Antetonitrus ingenipes (Sauropodiformes, Dinosauria): implications for the origins of Sauropoda. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 171: 151 - 205.", "Mannion, P. D., P. Upchurch, D. Schwarz, and O. Wings. 2019 a. Taxonomic affinities of the putative titanosaurs from the Late Jurassic Tendaguru Formation of Tanzania: phylogenetic and biogeographic implications for eusauropod dinosaur evolution. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 85: 784 - 909.", "Upchurch, P. 1998. The phylogenetic relationships of sauropod dinosaurs. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 124: 43 - 103.", "Mannion, P. D., P. Upchurch, R. N. Barnes, and O. Mateus. 2013. Osteology of the Late Jurassic Portuguese sauropod dinosaur Lusotitan atalaiensis (Macronaria) and the evolutionary history of basal titanosauriforms. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 168: 98 - 206.", "Upchurch, P., Y. Tomida, and P. M. Barrett. 2004 b. A new specimen of Apatosaurus ajax (Sauropoda: Diplodocidae) from the Morrison Formation (Upper Jurassic) of Wyoming, USA. National Science Museum Monographs 26: 1 - 108.", "Hatcher, J. B. 1901. Diplodocus (Marsh): its osteology, taxonomy, and probable habits, with a restoration of the skeleton. Memoirs of the Carnegie Museum 1: 1 - 63.", "Gilmore, C. W. 1936. Osteology of Apatosaurus with special reference to specimens in the Carnegie Museum. Memoirs of the Carnegie Museum 11: 175 - 300.", "McIntosh, J. S. 1990. Sauropoda; pp. 345 - 401 in D. B. Weishampel, P. Dodson, and H. Osmolska (eds.), The Dinosauria (First Edition). University California Press, Berkeley.", "Upchurch, P., and J. Martin, J. 2002. The Rutland Cetiosaurus: The anatomy and relationships of a Middle Jurassic British sauropod dinosaur. Palaeontology 45: 1049 - 1074.", "Upchurch, P., and J. Martin. 2003. The anatomy and taxonomy of Cetiosaurus (Saurischia: Sauropoda) from the Middle Jurassic of England. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23: 208 - 231.", "Mahammed, F., E. Lang, L. Mami, L. Mekahli, M. Benhamou, B. Bouterfa, A. Kacemi, S. Cherief, H. Chaouati, and P. Taquet. 2005. The \" Giant of Ksour \", a Middle Jurassic sauropod dinosaur from Algeria. Comptes Rendus Palevol 4: 707 - 714.", "Peng, G., Y. Ye, Y. Gao, C. Shu, and S. Jiang. 2005. Jurassic dinosaur faunas in Zigong. Sichuan People' s Publishing House, Chengdu, 236 pp.", "Ye, Y., Y. - H. Gao, and S. Jiang. 2005. A new genus of sauropod from Zigong, Sichuan. Vertebrata PalAsiatica 43: 175 - 181.", "Whitlock, J. A. 2011. A phylogenetic analysis of Diplodocoidea (Saurischia: Sauropoda). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 872 - 915.", "Bonaparte, J. F. 1986. Les dinosaures (carnosaures, allosaurides, sauropodes, cetiosaurides) du Jurassique Moyen de Cerro Condor (Chubut, Argentine) (Part 2). Annales de Paleontologie (Vert. - Invert.) 72: 325 - 386.", "Bonaparte J. F., B. J. Gonzalez Riga, and S. Apesteguia. 2006. Ligabuesaurus leanzai gen. et sp. nov. (Dinosauria, Sauropoda), a new titanosaur from the Lohan Cura Formation (Aptian, Lower Cretaceous) of Neuquen, Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 27: 364 - 376.", "Tschopp, E., O. Mateus, and R. B. J. Benson. 2015 a. A specimen-level phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision of Diplodocidae (Dinosauria, Sauropoda). PeerJ 3: e 857. doi. org / 10.7717 / peerj. 857", "Tschopp, E., and O. Mateus. 2013. The skull and neck of a new flagellicaudatan sauropod from the Morrison Formation and its implication for the evolution and ontogeny of diplodocid dinosaurs. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 11: 853 - 888.", "Wu, W. - H., C. - F. Zhou, O. Wings, T. Sekiya, and Z. - M. Dong. 2013. A new gigantic sauropod dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic of Shanshan, Xinjiang. Global Geology 32: 437 - 446.", "Wilson, J. A. 1999. A nomenclature for vertebral laminae in sauropods and other saurischian dinosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 19: 639 - 653.", "Xing, L, T. Miyashita, J. Zhang, D. Li, Y. Ye, T. Sekiya, F. Wang, and P. J. Currie. 2015. A new sauropod dinosaur from the Late Jurassic of China and the diversity, distribution, and relationships of mamenchisaurids. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 35: e 889701. doi. org / 10. 1080 / 02724634.2014.889701", "He, X. - L., K. Li, and K. - J. Cai. 1988. The Middle Jurassic Dinosaur Fauna from Dashanpu, Zigong, Sichuan. Vol IV. Sauropod Dinosaurs (2). Omeisaurus tianfuensis. Sichuan Publishing House of Science and Technology, Chengdu. 143 pp. [In Chinese, English summary]", "Ouyang, H., and Y. Ye. 2002. The first mamenchisaurian skeleton with complete skull: Mamenchisaurus youngi. Sichuan Science and Technology Press, Chengdu, 111 pp.", "Sekiya, T. 2011. Re-examination of Chuanjiesaurus anaensis (Dinosauria: Sauropoda) from the Middle Jurassic Chuanjie Formation, Lufeng County, Yunnan Province, southwest China. Memoir of the Fukui Prefectural Dinosaur Museum 10: 1 - 54.", "Mannion, P. D., R. Allain, and O. Moine. 2017. The earliest known titanosauriform sauropod dinosaur and the evolution of Brachiosauridae. PeerJ 5: e 3217. doi. org / 10.7717 / peerj. 3217", "Janensch, W. 1929. Die Wirbelsaule der Gattung Dicraeosaurus. Palaeontographica (Supplement VII) 2: 37 - 133.", "Janensch, W. 1936. Ein aufgestelltes Skelett von Dicraeosaurus hansemanni. Palaeontographica (Supplement 7): 299 - 308.", "Calvo, J. O., and L. Salgado. 1995. Rebbachisaurus tessonei sp. nov. a new Sauropoda from the Albian-Cenomanian of Argentina; new evidence on the origin of the Diplodocidae. GAIA 11: 13 - 33.", "Poropat, S. F., P. D. Mannion, P. Upchurch, S. A. Hocknull, B. P. Kear, M. Kundrat, T. R. Tischler, T. Sloan, G. H. K. Sinapius, J. A. Elliott, and D. A. Elliott. 2016. New Australian sauropods shed light on Cretaceous dinosaur palaeobiogeography. Scientific Reports 6: 34467. doi. org / 10.1038 / srep 34467", "Mannion, P. D. 2019. A turiasaurian sauropod dinosaur from the Early Cretaceous Wealden Supergroup of the United Kingdom. PeerJ 7: e 6348.", "Carballido, J. L., D. Pol, A. Otero, I. A. Cerda, L. Salgado, A. C. Garrido, J. Ramezani, N. R. Cuneo, and J. M. Krause. 2017. A new giant titanosaur sheds light on body mass evolution among sauropod dinosaurs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 284: 20171219. doi. org / 10.1098 / rspb. 2017.1219", "Young, C. C. 1954. On a new sauropod from Yiping, Szechuan, China. Acta Paleontologica Sinica 2: 355 - 369.", "Borsuk-Bialynicka, M. 1977. A new camarasaurid sauropod Opisthocoelicaudia skarzynskii gen. n., sp. n. from the Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia. Palaeontologica Polonica 37: 5 - 63.", "Harris, J. D., and P. Dodson. 2004. A new diplodocoid sauropod dinosaur from the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of Montana, USA. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 49: 197 - 210.", "Ksepka, D. T., and M. A. Norell. 2006. Erketu ellisoni, a long-necked sauropod from Bor Guve (Dornogov Aimag, Mongolia). American Museum Novitates 3508: 1 - 16.", "D' Emic, M. D., P. D. Mannion, P. Upchurch, R. B. J. Benson, Q. Pang, and Z. Cheng. 2013. Osteology of Huabeisaurus allocotus (Sauropoda: Titanosauriformes) from the Upper Cretaceous of China. PLoS ONE 8: e 69375. doi. org / 10.1371 / journal. pone. 0069375", "Rauhut, O. W. M., K. Remes, R. Fechner, G. Cladera, and P. Puerta. 2005. Discovery of a short-necked sauropod dinosaur from the Late Jurassic period of Patagonia. Nature 435: 670 - 672.", "Xu, X., P. Upchurch, P. D. Mannion, P. M. Barrett, O. R. Regalado- Fernandez, J. Mo, J. Ma, and H. Liu. 2018. A new Middle Jurassic diplodocoid suggests an earlier dispersal and diversification of sauropod dinosaurs. Nature Communications 9: 2300. doi. org / 10. 1038 / s 41467 - 018 - 05128 - 1", "Tsuihiji, T. 2004. The ligament system in the neck of Rhea americana and its implication for the bifurcated neural spines of sauropod dinosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 24: 165 - 172.", "Sereno, P. C., J. A. Wilson, L. M. Witmer, J. A. Whitlock, A. Maga, O. Ide, and T. A. Rowe. 2007. Structural extremes in a Cretaceous dinosaur. PLoS ONE 2: e 1230. doi. org / 10.1371 / journal. pone. 0001230", "Wedel, M. J. 2003. The evolution of vertebral pneumaticity in sauropod dinosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23: 344 - 357."]}