Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Hanover Lake Dam Project Area, Fort Dix, Burlington County, New Jersey, Part 1 and 2
Creators: name: Mooney, Douglas B.
name: Crist, Thomas A. J.
name: White, Richard L.
name: Morrell, Kimberly
Publisher: name: Kise Straw & Kolodner
Year: 2002
Subjects: subject: Fort Dix
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/80946/fort-dix
subject: Hanover Lake Dam
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/83730/hanover-lake-dam
subject: Delaware River
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/19618/delaware-river
subject: Burlington (County)
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/35302/burlington-county
subject: New Jersey (State / Territory)
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/geographic-keyword/1367/new-jersey-state-territory
subject: Historic
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/temporal-keyword/5728/historic
subject: Prehistoric
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/temporal-keyword/53/prehistoric
subject: Prehistoric
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/culture-keyword/120/prehistoric
subject: Historic
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/culture-keyword/25/historic
subject: 28-Bu-514
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/94758/28-bu-514
subject: Hanover Furnace Complex
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/95399/hanover-furnace-complex
subject: NR 1974
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-name/97833/nr-1974
subject: Archaeological Feature
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/339/archaeological-feature
subject: Pit
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/355/pit
subject: Artifact Scatter
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/340/artifact-scatter
subject: Brick Wall
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/1865/brick-wall
subject: Mortared stone wall
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/site-type/3209/mortared-stone-wall
subject: Shell
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/14/shell
subject: Wood
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/15/wood
subject: Ceramic
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/1/ceramic
subject: Chipped Stone
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/2/chipped-stone
subject: Fauna
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/4/fauna
subject: Glass
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/6/glass
subject: Building Materials
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/8/building-materials
subject: Metal
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/11/metal
subject: Kaolin Pipe
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/material-type/2444/kaolin-pipe
subject: Hanover Lake Dam Project
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/other-keyword/159119/hanover-lake-dam-project
subject: Phase II Archaeological Investigation
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/other-keyword/159036/phase-ii-archaeological-investigation
subject: Phase I Archaeological Survey
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/other-keyword/158937/phase-i-archaeological-survey
subject: Archaeological Overview
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/1/archaeological-overview
subject: Historic Background Research
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/18/historic-background-research
subject: Reconnaissance / Survey
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/7/reconnaissance-survey
subject: Heritage Management
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/24/heritage-management
subject: Site Evaluation / Testing
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/10/site-evaluation-testing
subject: Systematic Survey
valueUri: https://core.tdar.org/browse/investigation-type/12/systematic-survey

description: Part 1 of this report documents the methods, results, and conclusions of a Phase I Archaeological Survey at the Hanover Lake Dam area of the U.S. Army Garrison at Fort Dix (USATCFD), Burlington County, New Jersey. Conducted by the Cultural Resources Group of Kise Straw &amp; Kolodner, Inc. (KSK) in May 2001, this survey was performed for AMEC, the base’s environmental consultant. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the presence or absence of potentially significant prehistoric and/or historical cultural resources deposits within three areas adjacent to the western portion of Hanover Lake and the Hanover Furnace historical site where dam renovations and lead contaminated soil removal will be conducted. Collection and analysis of this information constitutes the first stage of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historical Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (NHPA). Part 2 of this report documents the supplemental Phase I and Phase II archaeological investigations of a portion or the Hanover Dam and Hanover Furnace area (28-BU-514) at the U.S. Army Garrison at Fort Dix (USATCFD), Burlington County, New Jersey that were conducted between September 16 and October 4, 2002 by the Cultural Resources Group of Kise Straw &amp; Kolodner, Inc. (KSK). This investigation was performed for AMEC, the Base’s environmental consultant, and was conducted in order to identify any potentially significant cultural resources in the Hanover Lake Dam vicinity prior to the proposed renovation of the dam itself, as well as the remediation of areas of lead contaminated soil. This additional archaeological testing was carried out to address the concerns expressed in the review comments received from the NJ DEP/NJ SHPO (09.20.01) on the work previously conducted at the project area that was documented in Part I of this report. The comments stated that: 1) portions of the APE were omitted from the testing regime and that “additional Phase I and Phase II of the APE will be necessary”; 2) that the Phase I testing conducted APE at the 50 test interval in Areas #1 and #2 of the APE was not tight enough to capture potentially intact historic midden deposits associated with the Hanover Furnace Complex that may be located in these areas; and, 3) that a Smithsonian number should be assigned to the site. The work documented in this report (Part II) was done to address the concerns expressed by the NJ DEP/NJ SHPO reviewer.