Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cosmic Shear
Creators: name: Troxel, M. A.
name: MacCrann, N.
name: Zuntz, J.
name: Eifler, T. F.
name: Krause, E.
name: Dodelson, S.
name: Gruen, D.
name: Blazek, J.
name: Friedrich, O.
name: Samuroff, S.
name: Prat, J.
name: Secco, L. F.
name: Davis, C.
name: Ferté, A.
name: DeRose, J.
name: Alarcon, A.
name: Amara, A.
name: Baxter, E.
name: Becker, M. R.
name: Bernstein, G. M.
name: Bridle, S. L.
name: Cawthon, R.
name: Chang, C.
name: Choi, A.
name: De Vicente, J.
name: Drlica-Wagner, A.
name: Elvin-Poole, J.
name: Frieman, J.
name: Gatti, M.
name: Hartley, W. G.
name: Honscheid, K.
name: Hoyle, B.
name: Huff, E. M.
name: Huterer, D.
name: Jain, B.
name: Jarvis, M.
name: Kacprzak, T.
name: Kirk, D.
name: Kokron, N.
name: Krawiec, C.
name: Lahav, O.
name: Liddle, A. R.
name: Peacock, J.
name: Rau, M. M.
name: Refregier, A.
name: Rollins, R. P.
name: Rozo, E.
name: Rykoff, E. S.
name: Sánchez, C.
name: Sevilla-Noarbe, I.
name: Sheldon, E.
name: Stebbins, A.
name: Varga, T. N.
name: Vielzeuf, P.
name: Wang, M.
name: Wechsler, R. H.
name: Yanny, B.
name: Abbott, T. M. C.
name: Abdalla, F. B.
name: Allam, S.
name: Annis, J.
name: Bechtol, K.
name: Benoit-Lévy, A.
name: Bertin, E.
name: Brooks, D.
name: Buckley-Geer, E.
name: Burke, D. L.
name: Rosell, A. Carnero
name: Kind, M. Carrasco
name: Carretero, J.
name: Castander, F. J.
name: Crocce, M.
name: Cunha, C. E.
name: D'Andrea, C. B.
name: da Costa, L. N.
name: DePoy, D. L.
name: Desai, S.
name: Diehl, H. T.
name: Dietrich, J. P.
name: Doel, P.
name: Fernandez, E.
name: Flaugher, B.
name: Fosalba, P.
name: García-Bellido, J.
name: Gaztanaga, E.
name: Gerdes, D. W.
name: Giannantonio, T.
name: Goldstein, D. A.
name: Gruendl, R. A.
name: Gschwend, J.
name: Gutierrez, G.
name: James, D. J.
name: Jeltema, T.
name: Johnson, M. W. G.
name: Johnson, M. D.
name: Kent, S.
name: Kuehn, K.
name: Kuhlmann, S.
name: Kuropatkin, N.
name: Li, T. S.
name: Lima, M.
name: Lin, H.
name: Maia, M. A. G.
name: March, M.
name: Marshall, J. L.
name: Martini, P.
name: Melchior, P.
name: Menanteau, F.
name: Miquel, R.
name: Mohr, J. J.
name: Neilsen, E.
name: Nichol, R. C.
name: Nord, B.
name: Petravick, D.
name: Plazas, A. A.
name: Romer, A. K.
name: Roodman, A.
name: Sako, M.
name: Sanchez, E.
name: Scarpine, V.
name: Schindler, R.
name: Schubnell, M.
name: Smith, M.
name: Smith, R. C.
name: Soares-Santos, M.
name: Sobreira, F.
name: Suchyta, E.
name: Swanson, M. E. C.
name: Tarle, G.
name: Thomas, D.
name: Tucker, D. L.
name: Vikram, V.
name: Walker, A. R.
name: Weller, J.
name: Zhang, Y.
Publisher: name: arXiv
Year: 2017
Subjects: subject: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
subject: FOS: Physical sciences
subject: FOS: Physical sciences

description: We use 26 million galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 shape catalogs over 1321 deg$^2$ of the sky to produce the most significant measurement of cosmic shear in a galaxy survey to date. We constrain cosmological parameters in both the flat $Λ$CDM and $w$CDM models, while also varying the neutrino mass density. These results are shown to be robust using two independent shape catalogs, two independent \photoz\ calibration methods, and two independent analysis pipelines in a blind analysis. We find a 3.5\% fractional uncertainty on $σ_8(Ω_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.782^{+0.027}_{-0.027}$ at 68\% CL, which is a factor of 2.5 improvement over the fractional constraining power of our DES Science Verification results. In $w$CDM, we find a 4.8\% fractional uncertainty on $σ_8(Ω_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.777^{+0.036}_{-0.038}$ and a dark energy equation-of-state $w=-0.95^{+0.33}_{-0.39}$. We find results that are consistent with previous cosmic shear constraints in $σ_8$ -- $Ω_m$, and see no evidence for disagreement of our weak lensing data with data from the CMB. Finally, we find no evidence preferring a $w$CDM model allowing $w\ne -1$. We expect further significant improvements with subsequent years of DES data, which will more than triple the sky coverage of our shape catalogs and double the effective integrated exposure time per galaxy.
description: 32 pages, 19 figures; matches PRD referee response version