Axelrodichthys megadromos Cavin, Valentin &amp; Garcia, 2016, sp. nov.
Creators: name: Cavin, Lionel
name: Valentin, Xavier
name: Garcia, Géraldine
Publisher: name: Zenodo
Year: 2016
Subjects: Biodiversity
Taxonomy
Animalia
Chordata
Sarcopterygii
Coelacanthiformes
Latimeriidae
Axelrodichthys
Axelrodichthys megadromos

description: <i>Axelrodichthys megadromos</i> sp. nov. (Figs. 2 and 3) <i>Etymology</i>. From the greek MέƳa&amp;sigmav;, megas, large and dRόM <i>Ο</i> &amp;sigmav;, dromos, driveway. The specific epithet emphasizes the arrival of this taxon from Gondwana probably by dispersal during the Cretaceous and refers to the building of a new highway in the vicinity of the type locality in the present time. <i>Holotype</i>. MDE F-61 (X. Valentin), holotype, a partial skull comprising the ethmosphenoid portion, elements of the suspensorium, of the lower jaw and some other components (Figs. 2 and 3). <i>Type locality and horizon</i>. MDE F-61 was collected from a locality near the village of Ventabren (Bouches-du-Rhône Department, Southeastern France) in a lower Campanian “Valdo-Fuvelian” facies composed of lignitic marls interbedded with lacustrine limestones. <i>Diagnosis</i>. A species of <i>Axelrodichthys</i> with an ethmosphenoid moiety approximately 3.5 times longer than wide in its narrowest part; very elongate penultimate posterior supraorbital; posterior extremity of the parasphenoid tooth plate heart-shaped and forming frontwards lateral wings separated by a medial ridge; parietals and nasals with no ornamentation, except faint ridges along their lateral margin; supraorbitals and postparietals with strong reticulated ornamentation. 4. Description The ethmosphenoid portion consists of a basisphenoid, most of the skull roof, the parasphenoid with no posterior extremity, and the right lateral ethmoid. The ethmosphenoid portion is not complete and a gap is present, but estimation of the total length based on the preserved parts indicates that this portion is approximately 3.5 times longer than wide in its narrowest part. <i>Skull roof</i>. The preserved part of the supraorbital series in <i>A. megadromos</i> indicates that the ethmosphenoid portion has concave margins in dorsal view (Fig. 4 A), as in <i>Axelrodichthys araripensis</i> and <i>A. maiseyi</i>, and to the contrary of <i>Mawsonia</i>, where it is slightly convex (Wenz, 1975; Maisey, 1986). The medial series of paired bones of the skull roof is composed of two pairs of parietals and at least two pairs of nasals. These ossifications bear no ornamentation, except faint ridges along their lateral margin. The anterior and posterior pairs of parietals are elongate and approximately 3 times longer than wide. The suture between both right parietals is oblique and the posterior parietal extends beneath the anterior one, as in most coelacanths. The suture between both left parietals is almost perpendicular to the skull roof axis. Anterior and posterior parietals are approximately equal in length. In <i>M. lavocati</i> (Figs. 4 D, E) and <i>Mawsonia</i> cf. <i>gigas</i> (Fig. 4 F) the anterior parietals are slightly shorter (Cavin and Forey, 2004 and Maisey, 1986, respectively) and longer in <i>M. brasiliensis</i> (Yabumoto, 2002, Fig. 4 G) than the posterior parietals. In <i>A. maiseyi</i> (Fig. 4 C) the anterior parietals are slightly shorter than the posterior ones (De Carvalho et al., 2013), while the situation is reverse in <i>Axelrodichthys araripensis</i> (Maisey, 1986, Fig. 4 B). Pairs of parietals of similar lengths were reported in <i>M</i>. <i>tegamensis</i> (Wenz, 1975, Fig. 4 H) and <i>Parnaibaia</i> (Yabumoto, 2008). In <i>A</i>. <i>megadromos</i>, the ventral processes of the posterior parietal are poorly preserved, but apparently relatively small and sutured to the antotic process of the basisphenoid. The lateral series of bones is composed of supraorbitals and tectals, which are as wide as the parietals, at least in the central part of the ethmosphenoid portion. A wide lateral bones series is a mawsoniid feature according to Wenz (1981). These ossifications bear a strong ornamentation composed of reticulate ridges. Although incompletely preserved and fractured, we identified on the right series a short supraorbital lining the posterior half of the posterior parietal, an elongate supraorbital spanning the rest of the posterior parietal and the posterior half of the anterior parietal, two relatively short supraorbitals and, on a separate piece, one element regarded as a tectal. On the left side, an elongate supraorbital corresponding to penultimate posterior right supraorbital is present and a single supraorbital is preserved more anteriorly. Although the number of supraorbitals plus tectals is not definitely identified, they are low in number, less than 8. In mawsoniids, supraorbitals may have variable shape and size between individuals of the same species, and even on both sides of a single specimen. However, the proportionally elongate penultimate posterior supraorbital present here is unknown in other mawsoniids. A large pore for the supraorbital canal opens posteriorly above the ventral process of the posterior parietal, between the latter ossification and the supraorbital. The canal runs anteriorly between the two series of bones, as usual in most coelacanths, and open to the exterior through small pores in the supraorbitals, which are difficult to observe because of the coarse ornamentation of these bones. <i>Basisphenoid and parasphenoid.</i> On the basisphenoid, the antotic process protrudes laterally and the sphenoid condyles are close, moderately developed, and present a squarish outline in dorsal view. As in <i>M. lavocati</i> and <i>A. araripensis</i>, the ventral side of the antotic process is grooved for the anterior division of the adductor mandibulae (Maisey, 1986; Cavin and Forey, 2004; Yabumoto and Uyeno, 2005). The processus connectens is elongate and arched in lateral view. In posterior view, the basisphenoid is similar to those of <i>M.</i> cf. <i>gigas</i>, <i>A. arapipensis</i> and <i>M. lavocati</i> (see Maisey [1986: figs 2B and 19B] and Cavin and Forey [2004: fig. 6B]). The anterior three-fourths of the parasphenoid is preserved, with its anterior tip on a separate fragment but separated from the rest of the ossification by a gap. The posterior-most preserved portion of the bone has parallel margins then the ossification broadens in its mid-length and forms lateral wings separated by a medial ridge, which also broadens frontwards. The medial ridge and posteriormost part of the lateral wings are covered with fine shagreen of teeth. There is no mention of such a longitudinally grooved toothed surface in <i>A. araripensis</i>, but the arrangement is similar in the specimen of <i>M. lavocati</i> described by Cavin &amp; Forey (2004), in which the grooves are interpreted as the site of insertion for the anterior end of the basicranial muscle. The posterior extremity of the parasphenoid tooth plate draws a narrow spine, as opposed to that of <i>M. lavocati</i> (Wenz, 1981; Yabumoto and Uyeno, 2005) (Fig. 5). The parasphenoid teeth show typical mawsoniid features, i.e. they are small, hemispherical and marked by fine striations that radiate from the apex. Such morphology is present in palatal, coronoid, prearticular and parasphenoid teeth of <i>Mawsonia</i> and <i>Axelrodichthys</i>, but also in some non-mawsoniid coelacanths (Cavin and Forey, 2004). The right lateral ethmoid (‘ectethmoid’ of Maisey [1986]) is preserved attached to the anterior tip of the parasphenoid, but the suture line between both ossifications is not visible. The base of the dorsal limb contacting the tectal is preserved: it is posteriorly very inclined indicating that the tip of the snout was shallow. The anterior lateral process has a posterior margin forming a right angle with the long axis of the bone, but it is regularly curved anteriorly. <i>Otico-occipital portion.</i> From this portion of the skull, only a left postparietal has been identified. The almost complete bone bears a strong ornamentation of coalescent ridges, which are as marked as on the supraorbital. The general outline is oval, but the thin margin of the bone is poorly preserved: The original contour was probably more angled, as in other mawsoniids. The anterior apophysis for articulation with the descending process of the posterior parietal is not as strongly developed as in other mawsoniids and located almost in the middle of the anterior margin, as in <i>M. lavocati</i> (Yabumoto &amp; Uyeno, 2005). The otic sensory canal opens in a fossa situated just posterolaterally to the articular process. <i>Suspensorium.</i> A portion of the right palatoquadrate is preserved. The quadrate bears a large double and asymmetrical condyle for articulation with the lower jaw, a typical feature in most coelacanths. The pterygoid is fragmentary but its ventral margin is preserved and straight, without the ventral swelling characteristic of the latimeriids (Dutel et al., 2012). The ossification overlaps the vertical branch of the quadrate medially and bears tiny teeth similar in shape to the parasphenoid teeth. The metapterygoid is partly preserved. It bears dorsally an elongate antotic articular facet and the bone forms an expended anterior process in lateral view comparable to the pattern present in <i>Mawsonia</i> and in <i>Axelrodichthys</i>. The bone is proportionally deeper than in <i>M.</i> cf. <i>gigas</i> (Maisey, 1986), but reminiscent of the arrangement observed in <i>A. araripensis</i> and <i>M. lavocati</i> (Maisey, 1986; Yabumoto and Uyeno, 2005). The autopalatine is visible as a triangular bone stuck un- der the nasal and tectal bones. <i>Lower jaw.</i> A large angular, well preserved except its anterior extremity, is very similar to the isolated angular described from the locality of Cruzy (Cavin et al., 2005). On the lateral side, four slit-like openings for the mandibular sensory canal are present along the posterior half of the ventral margin of the bone. The ornamentation consists of faint grooves and ridges radiating from the posterior third of the bone. In internal view, the groove for the external mandibular ramus of the facial nerve, the adductor fossa and the sutural area with the principal coronoid are well-marked. An incomplete bone showing a straight shaft and an internally curved extremity is identified as a right splenial by comparison with this bone in <i>M. gigas</i> (Carvalho &amp; Maisey, 2008). With the exception of a smooth area along the medial margin of the shaft, the external face is ornamented with irregular ridges, and bears five openings for the sensory canals, three being concentrated along the lateral margin of the curved anterior extremity. More pores were possibly present on the unpreserved posterior part. An incomplete right prearticular is preserved as a thin blade of bone, with its dorsal margin fitting approximately the outline of the right angular. The posterior shallow portion, corresponding to the level of the articular facet is smooth while the deeper portion is covered with the typical striated hemispherical teeth. <i>Cheek bones and operculo-gular region.</i> Two fragments of possible cheek ossifications are present and connected by matrix to the ethmosphenoid portion of the braincase and to the metapterygoid. They are reminiscent of postorbital and/or squamosal bones. Two plate-like bones are identified as fragments of gulars. The external face is ornamented with diverging faint grooves, which are more marked on the periphery of the bone. A fragmentary platelike bone bearing a Y-shaped crest on one side is identified as the urohyal. There is no evidence of the posterior fork, which is straight and deep in <i>Megalocoelacanthus</i> and more V-shaped in <i>Axelrodichthys</i> (Dutel <i>et al.</i>, 2 0 1 2). 5. Discussion <i>5.1. <i>Affinities</i> </i> The relatively coarse ornamentation of the skull roof, in particular of the suborbital bones and of the postparietal, allows referring MDE F-61 to a mawsoniid coelacanth (Forey, 1998). Another mawsoniid character, first noticed by Wenz (1981) in <i>Mawsonia</i> but observed later in <i>Axelrodichthys</i> and present on our specimen is the width of the supraorbital series at its mid-length, which is nearly equal to the width of the anterior parietal. In other coelacanths, the lateral series of bones (the supraorbital series) is narrower than the mediolateral series (the anterior parietals). The angular of <i>A. megadromos</i> is similar to the isolated angular described by Cavin et al. (2005) from Cruzy, which was referred to the <i>Mawsonia- Axelrodichthys</i> complex based on the following characters: ornamentation consisting of ridges radiating from a point in the posterior third of the bone, inflated lateral surface and few slit-like ventral openings of the sensory canal. Only the medial contact surface of the angular with the prearticular, which is the wellmarked in the Cruzy specimen and in the <i>Mawsonia-Axelrodichthys</i> complex, is slightly less developed in MDE F-61. This minor difference is regarded as intraspecific variation, and we refer the specimen form Cruzy to <i>A. megadromos</i>. Dutel et al. (2015) pointed out other mawsoniid characters on the basisphenoid, which are observed in MDE F-61: The dorsum sella is narrow and the close sphenoid condyles are separated by a marked notch. Issues about the taxonomical status of the South American and African species of <i>Mawsonia</i>, e.g. the specific position of <i>M</i>. cf. <i>gigas</i> from the Santana Formation and the validity of the African <i>Mawsonia</i> species based on fragmentary remains only (<i>M. Lybica</i>, <i>M. lavocati</i>), are beyond the scope of this article. The following discussion rests on comparisons with species from the <i>Mawsonia - Axelrodichthys</i> complex, when the material allows comparison, regardless the taxonomic statuses of these species. On the basis of the original diagnosis of <i>Axelrodichthys</i> (Maisey, 1986), together with subsequent emended diagnoses of this genus and of <i>Mawsonia</i> (Maisey, 1991a, b; Forey, 1998), the single discriminant generic character preserved on our material rests on the proportions of the parietonasal shield: It is at least three times longer than broad in <i>Axelrodichthys</i> and between two and two and a half times longer than broad in <i>Mawsonia</i>. Based on this character, the new species belongs to the genus <i>Axelrodichthys</i>. It should be noticed here that on the basis of this character, the specimen of <i>M. lavocati</i> described by Yabumoto &amp; Uyeno (2005) and the reconstruction by Cavin and Forey (2004) of the ethmosphenoid portion based on two specimens, all from the Cenomanian of Morocco, reveal proportions closer to those of <i>Axelrodichthys</i> than to those of <i>Mawsonia</i>, ca 3 times longer than broad. Although slightly distorted, the profile of the skull roof of the ethmosphenoid portion of MDE F-61 was likely concave in lateral view on the living fish, a character regarded as diagnostic for <i>Axelrodichthys</i> by Carvalho <i>et al.</i> (2013). Another feature discussed by Carvalho and Maisey (2008) is the size of the posterior parietals relatively to the supraorbitals. In most coelacanths, the posterior parietal sutures laterally with more than three supraorbitals, while in most mawsoniids (<i>Diplurus</i>, <i>Chinlea</i>, <i>Mawsonia</i>), the posterior parietal sutures with three supraorbitals. In <i>A. araripensis</i> and MDE F-13 only, the posterior parietal sutures with two supraorbitals. In <i>A. maiseyi</i>, the pattern is similar to <i>Mawsonia</i>, i.e. suture with three supraorbitals. According to De Carvalho et al. (2013), the occurrence of few large pores for the mandibular sensory canal, as observed in MDE F-13, is regarded as a character of <i>Axelrodichthys</i> (contra several small pores in <i>Mawsonia</i>). Other characters distinguishing <i>Mawsonia</i> from <i>Axelrodichthys</i> present on the braincase, such as proportion between the parietonasal and otico-occipital moieties, presence/absence of a median extracapsular, development of the descending process of the supratemporal, shape and arrangement of the cheek ossifications (shape of the postorbital, squamosal and lachrymojugal) and of the lower jaw (overlap surface of the angular with the dentary) are not observable on our specimen. The shared characters of MDE F-61 and <i>Axelrodichthys</i>, in particular with the type species <i>A. araripensis</i>, justify its inclusion into the genus <i>Axelrodichthys</i>. <i>A. megadromos</i> can be separated from <i>A. araripensis</i> by the very elongate penultimate posterior supraorbital, by the weaker ornamentation of the parietals and by the posterior extremity of the parasphenoid tooth plate, which is heartshaped and forms frontwards lateral wings separated by a medial ridge. The first two characters also separate <i>A. megadromos</i> from <i>A. maiseyi</i>. <i>5.2. Palaeobiogeography</i> Most Triassic (<i>Diplurus</i>, <i>Chinlea</i>) and Jurassic (<i>Parnaibaia</i>) mawsoniids are found in freshwater deposits (Forey, 1998; Yabumoto, 2008). <i>Trachymetopon</i>, resolved as the sister-genus to the <i>Mawsonia - Axelrodichthys</i> complex (Dutel et al., 2015), was found in marine deposits in the Lower and Upper Jurassic of Europe (Dutel et al., 2014, 2015). During the Cretaceous, most of the mawsoniid occurrences are from freshwater deposits, or deposits with strong freshwater inputs, with the possible exception of <i>Mawsonia</i> and <i>Axelrodichthys</i> from the Santana Formation in Brazil. Although probably marine, the palaeoenvironment of the Santana Formation, however, did certainly not correspond to an open marine habitat. Based on the absence of open marine forms, Cretaceous mawsoniids are putative good indicators of continental connections, although narrow marine environments were possibly not impassable barriers for them. The Late Cretaceous biogeography of the European Archipelago was much discussed. The first palaeobiogeographical studies of Late Cretaceous tetrapods from southern Europe indicated Gondwanan affinities with Africa and South America (Buffetaut, 1989; Le Loeuff, 1991). More recent studies (Pereda-Suberbiola, 2009; Pereda- Suberbiola et al., 2015) based on an updated compilation of tetrapod families indicate that most of families have affinities with northern land masses (Palaeolaurasia, Euramerica, Asia or endemic to Europe) with only a few elements showing Gondwanan affinities. This pattern is possibly made more complex by the presence of a spatial barrier, which separated the European Archipelago between a Tethyan area in the east and a southwestern area (Weishampel et al., 2010). This separation is exemplified by the eastern most islands showing Asian affinities (Csiki et al., 2010; Ösi et al., 2010) and the western most islands showing more North American affinities in the Late Maastrichtian (Martin et al., 2005; Puértolas et al., 2011). On the western part of the Archipelago, the Campanian-Maastrichtian time interval witnessed an important temporal turnovers (Le Loeuff et al., 1994; Blain et al., 2010), while on the eastern part, the composition of the vertebrate assemblage appeared to have been more stable (Csiki-Sava et al., 2016). Because all Cretaceous mawsoniid occurrences known so far are from Western Gondwana (South America and Africa) plus Madagascar, the occurrence of <i>A. megadromos</i> in the lower Campanian of the Ibero-Armorican Island of the European archipelago, associated with the observation that it is absent so far in the Early and early Late Cretaceous of that region, is a strong indication that fishes from this lineage dispersed from southern continental masses during the Late Cretaceous. Dispersal events between Western Gondwana and Europe in the Late Cretaceous have already been recorded in the ginglymodian and characiform freshwater or brackish lineages (Cavin et al., 1996 and
description: Published as part of <i>Lionel Cavin, Xavier Valentin &amp; Géraldine Garcia, 2016, A new mawsoniid coelacanth (Actinistia) from the Upper Cretaceous of Southern France, pp. 65-73 in Cretaceous Research 62</i> on pages 67-72, DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2016.02.002, http://zenodo.org/record/237914
description: {"references": ["Wenz, S., 1975. Un nouveau coelacanthide du Cretace inferieur du Niger, remarques sur la fusion des os dermiques. In: Colloque international CNRS, Problemes actuels de paleontologie-evolution des vertebres. vol. 218 Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Paris, pp. 175 \u203e 190.", "Maisey, J. G., 1986. Coelacanths from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil. American Museum Novitates 2866, 1 \u203e 30.", "Cavin, L., Forey, P. L., 2004. New mawsoniid coelacanth (Sarcopterygii: Actinistia) remains from the Cretaceous of the Kem Kem beds, SE Morocco. In: Tintori, A., Arratia, G. (Eds.), Mesozoic Fishes III \u203e Systematics, Plaeoenvironments and Biodiversity. Dr Pfeil Verlag, Munchen, pp. 493 \u203e 506.", "Yabumoto, Y., 2002. A new coelacanth from the Early Cretaceous of Brazil (Sarcopterygii, Actinistia). Paleontological Research 6, 343 \u203e 350.", "De Carvalho, M. S. S., Gallo, V., Santos, H. R. S., 2013. New species of coelacanth fish from the Lower Cretaceous (Albian) of the Grajau Basin, NE Brazil. Cretaceous Research 46, 80 \u203e 89.", "Yabumoto, Y., 2008. A new mesozoic coelacanth from Brazil (Sarcopterygii, Actinistia). Paleontological Research 12, 329 \u203e 343.", "Wenz, S., 1981. Un coelacanthe geant, Mawsonia lavocati Tabaste, de l'Albien-base du Cenomanien du sud marocain. Annales de Paleontologie (Vertebres) 67, 1 \u203e 20.", "Yabumoto, Y., Uyeno, T., 2005. New materials of a Cretaceous coelacanth, Mawsonia lavocati Tabaste from Morocco. Bulletin of the National Science Museum 31, 39 \u203e 49.", "Dutel, H., Maisey, J. G., Schwimmer, D. R., Janvier, P., Herbin, M., Clement, G., 2012. The Giant Cretaceous Coelacanth (Actinistia, Sarcopterygii) Megalocoelacanthus dobiei Schwimmer, Stewart &amp; Williams, 1994, and its Bearing on Latimerioidei Interrelationships. PLoS ONE 7, e 49911.", "Cavin, L., Forey, P. L., Buffetaut, E., Tong, H., 2005. Latest European coelacanth shows Gondwanan affinities. Biology Letters 2005, 176 \u203e 177.", "Carvalho, M. S. S., Maisey, J. G., 2008. New occurrence of Mawsonia (Sarcopterygii: Actinistia) from the Early Cretaceous of the Sanfranciscana Basin, Minas Gerais, southeastern Brazil. In: Cavin, L., Longbottom, A., Richter, M. (Eds.), Fishes and the Break-up of Pangaea, vol. 295. Special Publications. Geological Society, London, pp. 109 \u203e 144.", "Forey, P. L., 1998. History of the Coelacanth Fishes. Chapman and Hall, London.", "Dutel, H., Herbin, M., Clement, G., 2015. First occurrence of a mawsoniid coelacanth in the Early Jurassic of Europe. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology e 929581.", "Maisey, J. G., 1991 a. Mawsonia Woodward, 1907. In: Maisey, J. G. (Ed.), Santana Fossils. An Illustated Atlas. T. F. H. Publications, Inc., Neptun City, pp. 317 \u203e 323.", "Maisey, J. G., 1991 b. Axelrodichthys Maisey, 1986. In: Maisey, J. G. (Ed.), Santana Fossils. An Illustrated Atlas. T. F. H. Publications, Inc., Neptun City, 303 \u203e 3014.", "Dutel, H., Pennetier, E., Pennetier, G., 2014. A giant marine coelacanth from the Jurassic of Normandy, France. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 4, 1239 \u203e 1242.", "Buffetaut, E., 1989. Archosaurian reptiles with Gondwanan affinities in the Upper Cretaceous of Europe. Terra Nova 1, 69 \u203e 74.", "Le Loeuff, J., 1991. The Campano-Maastrichtian vertebrate faunas from southern Europe and their relationships with other faunas in the world; palaeobiogeographical implications. Cretaceous Research 12, 93 \u203e 114.", "Pereda-Suberbiola, X., 2009. Biogeographical affinities of Late Cretaceous continental tetrapods of Europe: a review. Bulletin de la Societe geologique de France 180, 57 \u203e 71.", "Osi, A., Butler, R., Weishampel, D. B., 2010. A Late Cretaceous ceratopsian dinosaur from Europe with Asian affinities. Nature 465, 466 \u203e 468.", "Csiki, Z., Vremir, M., Brusatte, S. L., Norell, M. A., 2010. An aberrant island-dwelling theropod dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Romania. PNAS 107, 15357 \u203e 15361.", "Martin, J. E., Case, J. A., Jagt, J. W. M., Schulp, A. S., Mulder, E. W. A., 2005. A New European Marsupial indicates a Late Cretaceous high-latitude transatlantic dispersal route. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 12, 495 \u203e 511.", "Puertolas, E., Canudo, J. I., Cruzado-Caballero, P., 2011. A new Crocodylian from the Late Maastrichtian of Spain: implications for the initial radiation of crocodyloids. PLoS ONE 6, e 20011.", "Le Loeuff, J., Buffetaut, E., Martin, M., 1994. The last stages of dinosaur faunal history in Europe: a succession of Maastrichtian dinosaur assemblages from the Corbieres (southern France). Geological Magazine 131, 625 \u203e 630.", "Blain, H. - A., Canudo, J. I., Cuenca-Bescos, G., Lopez-Martinez, N., 2010. Amphibians and squamate reptiles from the latest Maastrichtian (Upper Cretaceous) of Blasi 2 (Huesca, Spain). Cretaceous Research 31, 433 \u203e 446.", "Csiki-Sava, Z., Vremir, M., Vasile, S., Brusatte, S. L., Dyke, G., Naish, D., Norell, M. A., Totoianu, R., 2016. The East Side Story e The Transylvanian latest Cretaceous continental vertebrate record and its implications for understanding CretaceousePaleogene boundary events. Cretaceous Research 57, 662 \u203e 698.", "Cavin, L., Martin, M., Valentin, X., 1996. Decouverte d' Atractosteus africanus (Actinopterygii, Lepisosteidae) dans le Campanien inferieur de Ventabren (Bouchesdu-Rhone, France). Implications paleobiogeographiques. Revue de Paleobiologie 15, 1 \u203e 7.", "Otero, O., Valetin, X., Garcia, G., 2008. Cretaceous characiform fishes (Teleostei: Ostariophysi) from Northern Tethys: description of new material from the Maastrichtian of Provence (Southern France) and palaeobiogeographical implications. In: Cavin, L., Longbottom, A., Richter, M. (Eds.), Fishes and the Breakup of Pangaea, Geological Society, London. SP 295, pp. 155 \u203e 164.", "Schaeffer, B., 1952. Rates of evolution in the coelacanth and dipnoan fishes. Evolution 6, 101 \u203e 111.", "Cloutier, R., 1991. Patterns, trends, and rates of evolution within the Actinistia. Environmental Biology of Fishes 32, 23 \u203e 58.", "Schultze, H. - P., 2004. Mesozoic sarcopterygians. In: Arratia, G., Tintori, A. (Eds.), Mesozoic Fishes 3 - systematics, Paleoenvironments and Biodiverity. Verlag Dr Friedrich Pfeil, Munchen, pp. 463 \u203e 492.", "Friedman, M., Coates, M. I., 2006. A new recognized fossil coelacanth highlights the early morphological diversification of the clade. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B 273, 245 \u203e 250.", "Cavin, L., Guinot, G., 2014. Coelacanths as \" almost living fossils \". Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 2."]}