Method and Block Synchronization in Java

When we start two or more threads within a program, there may be a situation when multiple threads try to access the same resource and finally they can produce unforeseen result due to concurrency issues. For example, if multiple threads try to write within a same file then they may corrupt the data because one of the threads can override data or while one thread is opening the same file at the same time another thread might be closing the same file.
So there is a need to synchronize the action of multiple threads and make sure that only one thread can access the resource at a given point in time. This is implemented using a concept called monitors. Each object in Java is associated with a monitor, which a thread can lock or unlock. Only one thread at a time may hold a lock on a monitor.
Java programming language provides a very handy way of creating threads and synchronizing their task by using synchronized blocks. You keep shared resources within this block. Following is the general form of the synchronized statement.
synchronized(objectidentifier) {
   // Access shared variables and other shared resources
}
Here, the objectidentifier is a reference to an object whose lock associates with the monitor that the synchronized statement represents. Now we are going to see two examples, where we will print a counter using two different threads. When threads are not synchronized, they print counter value which is not in sequence, but when we print counter by putting inside synchronized() block, then it prints counter very much in sequence for both the threads.
Here is a simple example which may or may not print counter value in sequence and every time we run it, it produces a different result based on CPU availability to a thread.
 Live Demo
class PrintDemo extends Thread {
   public void printCount() {
      try {
         for(int i = 5; i > 0; i--) {
            System.out.println("Counter --- " + i );
         }
      } catch (Exception e) {
         System.out.println("Thread " + Thread.currentThread().getName()+" interrupted.");
      }
   }
   public void run() {
      printCount();
      System.out.println("Thread " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " exiting.");
   }
}
public class TestThread {
   public static void main(String args[]) {
      PrintDemo PD = new PrintDemo();
      Thread t1 = new Thread(PD );
      Thread t2 = new Thread(PD );
      t1.start();
      t2.start();
      // wait for threads to end
      try {
         t1.join();
         t2.join();
      } catch ( Exception e) {
         System.out.println("Interrupted");
      }
   }
}
This produces a different result every time you run this program.
Counter --- 5
Counter --- 5
Counter --- 4
Counter --- 4
Counter --- 3
Counter --- 3
Counter --- 2
Counter --- 2
Counter --- 1
Counter --- 1
Thread Thread-1 exiting.
Thread Thread-2 exiting.
Here is the same example which prints counter value in sequence and every time we run it, it produces the same result. W've put synchronized keyword over a block so that counter increment code is now locked as per the object during method execution. We're using current object as lock which we're passing in the synchronized block as parameter.
 Live Demo
class PrintDemo extends Thread {
   public void printCount() {
      try {
         for(int i = 5; i > 0; i--) {
            System.out.println("Counter --- " + i );
         }
      } catch (Exception e) {
         System.out.println("Thread " + Thread.currentThread().getName()+" interrupted.");
      }
   }
   public void run() {
      synchronized(this) {
         printCount();
      }
      System.out.println("Thread " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " exiting.");
   }
}
public class TestThread {
   public static void main(String args[]) {
      PrintDemo PD = new PrintDemo();
      Thread t1 = new Thread(PD );
      Thread t2 = new Thread(PD );
      t1.start();
      t2.start();
      // wait for threads to end
      try {
         t1.join();
         t2.join();
      } catch ( Exception e) {
         System.out.println("Interrupted");
      }
   }
}
This produces the same result every time you run this program.
Counter --- 5
Counter --- 4
Counter --- 3
Counter --- 2
Counter --- 1
Counter --- 5
Counter --- 4
Counter --- 3
Counter --- 2
Counter --- 1
Thread Thread-2 exiting.
Thread Thread-1 exiting.
Here is the same example which prints counter value in sequence and every time we run it, it produces the same result. W've put synchronized keyword over a method this time so that complete method is locked as per the object during method execution.
 Live Demo
class PrintDemo extends Thread {
   public void printCount() {
      try {
         for(int i = 5; i > 0; i--) {
            System.out.println("Counter --- " + i );
         }
      } catch (Exception e) {
         System.out.println("Thread " + Thread.currentThread().getName()+" interrupted.");
      }
   }
   public synchronized void run() {
      printCount();
      System.out.println("Thread " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " exiting.");
   }
}
public class TestThread {
   public static void main(String args[]) {
      PrintDemo PD = new PrintDemo();
      Thread t1 = new Thread(PD );
      Thread t2 = new Thread(PD );
      t1.start();
      t2.start();
      // wait for threads to end
      try {
         t1.join();
         t2.join();
      } catch ( Exception e) {
         System.out.println("Interrupted");
      }
   }
}
This produces the same result every time you run this program.
Counter --- 5
Counter --- 4
Counter --- 3
Counter --- 2
Counter --- 1
Thread Thread-1 exiting.
Counter --- 5
Counter --- 4
Counter --- 3
Counter --- 2
Counter --- 1
Thread Thread-2 exiting.