Why Java Strings are Immutable?

19 Feb, 2022
Before proceeding further with the fuss of immutability, let’s just take a look into the String class and its functionality a little before coming to any conclusion.
This is how a String works:
String str = "knowledge";
This, as usual, creates a string containing “knowledge” and assigns it to reference str. Simple enough? Let us perform some more functions:
// assigns a new reference to the 
// same string "knowledge"
String s = str;     
Let’s see how the below statement works:
  str = str.concat(" base");
This appends a string ” base” to str. But wait, how is this possible, since String objects are immutable? Well to your surprise, it is.
When the above statement is executed, the VM takes the value of String str, i.e. “knowledge” and appends ” base”, giving us the value “knowledge base”. Now, since Strings are immutable, the VM can’t assign this value to str, so it creates a new String object, gives it a value “knowledge base”, and gives it reference str.
An important point to note here is that, while the String object is immutable, its reference variable is not. So that’s why, in the above example, the reference was made to refer to a newly formed String object.
At this point in the example above, we have two String objects: the first one we created with value “knowledge”, pointed to by s, and the second one “knowledge base”, pointed to by str. But, technically, we have three String objects, the third one being the literal “base” in the concat statement.
These are some more reasons for making String immutable in Java. These are:
The String pool cannot be possible if String is not immutable in Java. A lot of heap space is saved by JRE. The same string variable can be referred to by more than one string variable in the pool. String interning can also not be possible if the String would not be immutable.
If we don’t make the String immutable, it will pose a serious security threat to the application. For example, database usernames, passwords are passed as strings to receive database connections. The socket programming host and port descriptions are also passed as strings. The String is immutable, so its value cannot be changed. If the String doesn’t remain immutable, any hacker can cause a security issue in the application by changing the reference value.
The String is safe for multithreading because of its immutableness. Different threads can access a single “String instance”. It removes the synchronization for thread safety because we make strings thread-safe implicitly.
Immutability gives the security of loading the correct class by Classloader. For example, suppose we have an instance where we try to load java.sql.Connection class but the changes in the referenced value to the myhacked.Connection class does unwanted things to our database.
What if we didn’t have another reference s to “knowledge”? We would have lost that String. However, it still would have existed but would be considered lost due to having no references. Look at one more example below
Java
// Java Program to demonstrate why// Java Strings are immutable import java.io.*; class GFG {    public static void main(String[] args)    {        String s1 = "java";        s1.concat(" rules");         // Yes, s1 still refers to "java"        System.out.println("s1 refers to " + s1);    }}
s1 refers to java
Explanation:
The first line is pretty straightforward: create a new String “java” and refer s1 to it.Next, the VM creates another new String “java rules”, but nothing refers to it. So, the second String is instantly lost. We can’t reach it.
The first line is pretty straightforward: create a new String “java” and refer s1 to it.
Next, the VM creates another new String “java rules”, but nothing refers to it. So, the second String is instantly lost. We can’t reach it.
The reference variable s1 still refers to the original string “java”.
Almost every method, applied to a String object in order to modify it, creates a new String object. So, where do these String objects go? Well, these exist in memory, and one of the key goals of any programming language is to make efficient use of memory.
As applications grow, it’s very common for String literals to occupy a large area of memory, which can even cause redundancy. So, in order to make Java more efficient, the JVM sets aside a special area of memory called the “String constant pool”.
When the compiler sees a String literal, it looks for the String in the pool. If a match is found, the reference to the new literal is directed to the existing String and no new String object is created. The existing String simply has one more reference. Here comes the point of making String objects immutable:
In the String constant pool, a String object is likely to have one or many references. If several references point to the same String without even knowing it, it would be bad if one of the references modified that String value. That’s why String objects are immutable.
Well, now you could say, what if someone overrides the functionality of the String class? That’s the reason that the String class is marked final so that nobody can override the behavior of its methods.
nishkarshgandhi
java-basics
java-JVM
Java-String-Programs
Java-Strings
Java
Strings
Java-Strings
Strings
Java
Writing code in comment?
Please use ide.geeksforgeeks.org,
generate link and share the link here.