Document: 391 U.S. 604 88 S.Ct. 1864 20 L.Ed.2d 843 Julia IOANNOUv.NEW YORK. No. 191. Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 1962. June 3, 1968 Sydney J. Schwartz, on motion. Louis Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. New York, and Daniel M. Cohen, Asst. Gen., in opposition. On Motion for Leave to File a Petition Rehearing. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion leave file petition rehearing is denied upon representation Attorney General York that movant may new application 'to withdraw funds deposited with City Treasurer' light changed circumstances. See Zschernig v. Miller, 389 429, 664, 19 683; Goldstein Cox, 581, 694, 781. 2 Mr. Justice DOUGLAS. 3 Since only circumstances concern intervening decision this 683, since rationale applies custodial statutes such as has well escheat like Oregon's, I would dispose case here now (either after or without oral argument) not require petitioner retravel once more long, arduous, expensive path from York's surrogate court. 4 HARLAN deny unconditionally rehearing, substantially reasons given his dissenting opinion Ohio Power Co., 353 98, 99, 77 652, 683. 5 FORTAS MARSHALL took no part consideration

Category: 8