Document: Cite as: 559 U. S. ____ (2010) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of United States Reports. Readers are requested notify Reporter Decisions, Supreme Court States, Wash ington, D. C. 20543, any typographical or other errors, order that corrections may be made goes press. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JAMAL KIYEMBA ET AL. v. BARACK H. OBAMA, PRESIDENT ON WRIT CERTIORARI TO APPEALS FOR DISTRICT COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 08–1234. Decided March 1, 2010 PER CURIAM. We granted certiorari, 558 ___ (2009), on ques tion whether a federal court exercising habeas jurisdiction has power release prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay “where Executive detention definite and without authorization law, into continental only possible effective remedy,” Pet. for Cert. i. By now, however, each detainees issue this case received least one offer resettlement another country. Most have accepted an resettlement; five detainees, rejected two such offers still being Bay. change underlying facts affect legal issues presented. No yet ruled light new facts, we decline first do so. See, e.g., Cutter Wilkinson, 544 U.S. 709, 718, n. 7 (2005) (“[W]e review, not view”). Under these circumstances, vacate judgment remand Appeals District Columbia Circuit. It should determine, instance, what further proceedings necessary appropriate 2 OBAMA full prompt disposition developments. so ordered.

Category: 8