Document: 393 U.S. 410 89 S.Ct. 584 21 L.Ed.2d 637 William SPINELLI, Petitioner,v.UNITED STATES. No. 8. Argued Oct. 16 and 17, 1968. Decided Jan. 27, 1969. Irl B. Baris, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner. Joseph J. Connolly, Washington, D.C., respondent, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court. Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion 1 Spinelli was convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 19521 traveling to Missouri, from a nearby Illinois suburb with intention conducting gambling activities proscribed Missouri law. See Mo.Rev.Stat. 563.360 (1959), V.A.M.S. At every appropriate stage in proceedings lower courts, petitioner challenged constitutionality warrant which authorized FBI search that uncovered evidence necessary his conviction. each stage, Spinelli's challenge treated different way. pretrial suppression hearing, United States District Court Eastern held lacked standing raise Fourth Amendment objection. A unanimous panel Appeals Eighth Circuit rejected Court's ground, majority holding further issued without probable cause. After an en banc rehearing, sustained affirmed conviction vote six two, 382 F.2d 871. Both dissenting opinions reflect most conscientious effort apply principles we announced Aguilar v. Texas, 378 108, 84 1509, 12 723 (1964), factual situation whose basic characteristics have not been at all uncommon recent cases. Believing it desirable should be explicated, granted certiorari, 390 942, 88 1025, 19 1130, our writ being later limited question constitutional validity seizure.2 391 933, 1834, 20 853. For reasons follow reverse. 2 * 3 '(3) otherwise promote, manage, establish, carry on any unlawful activity, thereafter performs or attempts perform acts specified subparagraphs (1), (2), (3), shall fined more than $10,000 imprisoned five years, both. 4 '(b) As used this section 'unlawful activity' means (1) business enterprise involving violation laws State they are committed *.' 5 In Aguilar, had upon affidavit police officers who swore only 'received reliable information credible person do believe' narcotics were illegally stored described premises. While recognizing constitu ional requirement cause can satisfied hearsay information, inadequate two reasons. First, application failed set forth 'underlying circumstances' enable magistrate independently judge informant's conclusion where he said were. Second, affiant-officers did attempt support their claim informant "credible' 'reliable." The Government is, however, quite right saying present case is ample Aguilar. Not does contain report anonymous informant, but also contains independent investigation corroborate tip. We then, required delineate manner Aguilar's two-pronged test applied these circumstances. 6 essence, affidavit, reproduced full Appendix opinion, contained following allegations:3 7 1. kept track movements days during month August 1965. On four occasions, seen crossing one bridges leading into between 11 a.m. 12:15 p.m. days, parking car lot residents apartment house 1108 Indian Circle Drive 3:30 4:45 p.m.4 day, followed enter particular building. 8 2. An check telephone company revealed telephones listed name Grace P. Hagen, carrying numbers WYdown 4—0029 0136. 9 3. stated 'William known affiant federal law enforcement agents local as bookmaker, associate bookmakers, gambler, gamblers.' 10 4. Finally 'has informed confidential operating handbook accepting wagers disseminating wagering assigned 4—0136.' There no last item mentioned, detailing tip, has fundamental place application. Without it, could established. first items innocent-seeming activity data. travels building entry occasion hardly taken bespeaking activity; there surely nothing unusual about containing separate telephones. Many householder indulges himself petty luxury. Finally, allegation 'known' other gambler gamblers bald uni luminating assertion suspicion entitled weight appraising magistrate's decision. Nathanson States, 290 41, 46, 54 11, 12, 78 L.Ed. 159 (1933). So much indeed deny. Rather, reasoning Appeals, claims tip gives suspicious color FBI's reports conduct that, conversely, surveillance corroborates thereby entitling weight. It true, course, obligated render judgment based common-sense reading entire affidavit. Ventresca, 380 102, 85 741, 745, 13 684 (1965). believe, 'totality approach paints too broad brush. Where, here, informer's element finding cause, its proper must determined precise analysis. measured against standards so probative value assessed. If found allegations then considered. well, enunciated inform He ask: Can fairly even when certain parts corroborated sources, trustworthy would pass tests corroboration? relevant inquiry well because establishes designed implement long-standing principle 'neutral detached magistrate,' 'the officer engaged often competitive ferreting out crime.' Johnson 333 10, 14, 68 367, 369, 92 436 (1948). cannot properly discharged duty if relies which—even partially corroborated—is passes requirements alone. 14 Applying case, consider given considered apart rest clear Commissioner credit abdicating function. Though confidant 'reliable,' offered reason conclusion. Perhaps important fact satisfied. sufficient statement underlying circumstances informer concluded running bookmaking operation. told how source received information—it alleged personally observed work ever placed bet him. Moreover, came indirectly, explain why sources reliable. Cf. Jaben 381 214, 1365, 345 absence gathered, especially describe accused's criminal detail may know relying something substantial casual rumor circulating underworld accusation merely individual's general reputation. 15 provided Draper 358 307, 79 329, 327 provides suitable benchmark. Hereford, Government's state way obtained reported gone Chicago day before train return Denver three ounces heroin mornings. Hereford went describe, minute particularity, clothes wearing arrival station. magistrate, confronted such detail, reasonably infer gained way.5 Such inference made case. Here, facts supplied using phones operations. This meager easily offhand remark heard neighborhood bar. Nor believe patent doubts raises report's reliability adequately resolved consideration investigative efforts. most, indicated some purpose. itself both generally charge basis Once again, comparison. Independent small informant. There, police, meeting inbound second morning saw man dress corresponded precisely Hereford's detailed description. apparent fabricating whole cloth; since sort common experience recognized having way, perfectly 17 conclude, tip—even extent indicated—was provide say insubstantial counted determination. needed support. When look application, find permit suspicions engendered ripen crime probably committed. already seen, records suggestion themselves—and endowed aura virtue take sinister read light knowledge carried over premises ostensibly others normal purposes. argument number abnormal observed, cf. McCray Illinois, 386 300, 302, 87 1056, 1057, 62 (1967), fit neither factors present.6 All remains flat gambler. But just simple give additional insufficient. falls short Draper, decisions content notion cause.7 done, retreat established propositions probability, prima facie showing, standard Beck Ohio, 379 89, 96, 223, 228, 142 (1964); affidavits tested less rigorous those governing admissibility trial, 311, 1062 (1967); judging issuing magistrates confined niggardly limitations restrictions use sense, 745 (1965); determination paid great deference reviewing Jones 362 257, 270—271, 80 725, 735—736 (1960). sustain diluting safeguards assure disinterested judicial will interpose citizenry.8 reversed remanded court consistent opinion. ordered. Reversed remanded. 22 MARSHALL took part decision APPENDIX TO OPINION OF THE COURT. AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT SEARCH WARRANT. 23 I, Robert L. Bender, duly sworn, depose I am Special Agent Federal Bureau Investigation, make searches seizures. 24 That 6, 1965, approximately 11:44 a.m., Investigation driving 1964 Ford convertible, license HC3—649, onto Veterans Bridge East Missouri. 25 11:16 Eads 26 Further, 11:18 aforesaid convertible Western 27 4:40 bearing parked Chieftain Manor Apartments, block east Drive. 28 12:07 p.m., direction 29 3:46 p.m, Apartments 30 3:49 entering front entrance two-story located Drive, Chieftan Apartments. 31 13, 11:08 heading towards 32 11:11 33 3:45 area 34 3:55 corner floor southwest corner, Apartment F, numbered 35 16, 3:22 36 F.B.I. alight walk toward 37 Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Hagen. 4—0136. 38 gamblers. 39 40 /s/ 41 42 Agent, Investigation. 43 Subscribed sworn me 18th August, 44 R. O'Toole. 45 WHITE, concurring. 46 investigator's equipment moved address issuance warrant. oath affirms honesty negatives lie imagination. Personal observation attests asserted—that named address. 47 simply avers, more, paraphernalia premises, issue, though belief honest one, evidenced oath, knows him experienced, intelligent past. settled (1933), insufficient officer's swearing illegal liquor sought. unsupported satisfy 269, 735, 697 (1960); Grau 287 124, 53 38, 77 212 (1932); Byars 273 28, 29, 248, 71 520 (1927). 48 What missing like cases affiant's believing affidavit—the good 'cause' had. swears address, possibilities equipment; (2) perceived presence inferred; (3) someone else. good. unless given, officer, existence Giordenello 357 480, 486, 1245, 1250, 1503 (1958); With respect hearsay, issue absent crediting hearsay. Because asserting, location personal likelihood unidentified third party, type unacceptable. 49 Neither states comes unnamed, unknown. elements completely furnished supra, requires come observation, turn receive another? Absent report, stands better same effect. Indeed, stating unacceptable, quixotic similar furnish strong acceptable Amendment, is. past current previous himself. 50 rests hearsay—an report—what things: declare either asserted; it—perhaps usual grounds information. presents few problems: although purports first-hand remaining doubt centers worry dissipated complicated. if, example, actors nature admission interest, giving sufficient. 51 inclined agree 'honest' sufficiently detailed, effect verify ante, 589. Detailed sometimes imply facts. Suppose whom satisfactory living room describes appointments furnishments apartment. Detail this, true latter, person's sources; making wholly false report. arguable facts, usually subject day-to-day conversation. viewed 52 kind related sent ahead city except intimately connected careful arrangements posited honest, somehow very likely plan, them majority's agree, seems plain inferred actor event, possible harm requiring effect, removing difficult recurring questions arise situations. Of proceed basis. Instead pointed getting off time, dressed predicted, critical possessing verified 'reasonable grounds' narcotics. Unquestionably, verification dress, gait reinforced informant—he made-up story. what tenth justify verifying nine coming source, my place, proposition logically conjunction nine. No suggest anyone 10:30 was, brisk zippe bag, arrested thrust significance proof tenth. instead relates source: things, critical, unveri ied 55 purposes assertions. suffice, suppose, 607 proceeds 201, description applying makes believable 607. locked safe manager verifies everything contents safe? appreciably verification. still gotten concerning 56 tension Nathanson-Aguilar line evident course plus reputation circles add up Nathanson: reveal whether another and, presented. says, normally obtainable stop Independently, regularly frequenting away home. remained little phones, fair domestic claimed involved gambling. Since specific verified, become scope all? think so, particularly neutral, irrelevant material proving allegation: home indicates operation, bookmaking, multiple needed. awareness activities. majority, while seemingly embracing confines own Pending full-scale reconsideration hand, other, join reversal, affirm produce equally divided 57 BLACK, dissenting. 58 view, (1964) bad enough. far elevating hearing full-fledged witnesses brought forward attest alleged. today expands almost unbelievable proportions. strengthen probable-cause presentation eyewitnesses testify defendant commit crime. stronger ex lain sensual perceptions 'conclusion' responsible events observed. Nothing Constitution, degree certainty elaborate specificity policeman carefully search. 59 'no Warrants supported Oath affirmation, describing searched, persons things seized.' searched seized. supporting printed pages text included properly, show 'probable cause' violating Six members agreed holds, judges wrong. doing substitute circuit judges, reject reverse disposition vital administration justice, dissent vigorously can. 60 repeat petitioner's guilt. meticulously following: 61 shown going person. record large luxurious occupied 'petty luxury' telephones, numbers, live there. apartment's lot. highly showing extremely interested 63 telephones—the repeatedly visiting. Unless Court, beyond wishes require hold trials warrants, necessary—as holds—to operation.' Ante, 416. 64 bookmaker 'bald unilluminating decision.' 414. Although might admissible regular everyone knows, shuts eyes realities life, which, together circumstances, indicate probability taking place. 65 foregoing enough constitute obtain prove reasonable guilty. Even relies, contrary result, least written befor today's massive escalation it. dealt only: 66 'Affiants narcotic above purpose sale provisions law.' U.S., 109, S.Ct., 1511. 67 held, Clark, Stewart, myself, persuasiveness relied point presented us now relevant: 'If results appropriately would, entirely case.' n. 1, 69 two-judge minority below recognized, recognize today, rule disagreed fully below. 70 regret indefensible departure former Less years ago reaffirmed 746, (1965): teachings policy served, warrants interpreted courts realistic fashion. Technical once exacted pleadings area.' 72 Husty 282 694, 700—701, 240, 241—242, 75 629 (1931). 73 Departures considerable uneasiness deeply troubled statements Judge Gibson below: 74 'I am, indeed, disturbed after increasingly technical burdens officials. appear relentlessly chip narrowing effective holdings Rugendorf 376 528, (84 825, 887) protect privacy individuals hastily conceived intrusions, expanded setting over-technical approaching discarded pitfalls pleadings. rigid demands officers, fear easy criminals operate, detected unpunished. feel significant movement unwarranted, unneeded, dangerous efficiency.' (Dissenting opinion.) sensible view wholeheartedly 76 Mapp 367 643, 81 1684, 1081 decided 1961, time exclusionary Weeks 232 383, 341, 652 (1914) applicable States. matter calls question. statistics immediately available, arrests doubtless many thousands courts. potentially reviewable physically impossible review percentage Consequently, not, inevitably accept findings when, here trial appellate flagrant error here. best serve justice all, lawyers closer practical, everyday affairs life are. Notwithstanding contrary, does, does: 'retreat (1960).' 419. fact, moving rapidly, through complex analyses obfuscatory language, according unknown persuaded suspect actually guilty FORTAS, My Brother HARLAN'S animated share '(t)he security one's arbitrary intrusion police—which core Amendment—is free society.' Wolf Colorado, 338 25, 1359, 1361, 93 1782 (1949). 82 insist sympathetic indulgent latitude accorded performance task; foolish careless people deduce public welfare permits disregard restraints actions historic struggles freedom developed protection liberty dignity citizens power. 83 Jackson (dissenting) Brinegar 160, 180—181, 1302, 1313, 1879 (1949): '(The Amendment) mere second-class rights belong catalog indispensable freedoms. Among deprivations rights, none cowing population, crushing spirit individual putting terror heart. Uncontrolled seizure weapons arsenal government. And need briefly dwelt worked among possessed admirable qualities deprived human personality deteriorates self-reliance disappear homes, possessions hour unheralded police.' History1 teaches interposed hot pursuit appointed target, citizen;2 rubber-stamp; judicially adequate demonstrate justified yield fruits instruments or, recently ruled, tangible commission.3 exceptions always narrowly restricted4 role preservation balance Trupiano 334 699, 700, 1229, 1230, 1663 86 Today's deals, necessity obtaining prior search, problem subscribe criticism expressed BLACK dissent, believe—with respect—that constitutionally inadequate. unusually long detailed. recites substance somewhat obscured. paradoxical fullness infirmity finds. Stated language direct circumstantial agent executed sets WY 0029 4—0136; agencies bookmaker; 4—0136 apartment; frequented holds reference 'a informant,' alone, agrees 'FBI Aguilar,' conclude nevertheless fails meet 'two-pronged test' (a) 'reliable' (b) bookmaking. acknowledges, understood meaning deficient respects necessarily Other attested supply agreed. Our difference arrives opposite 90 expressly affidavit's conclusory story supplemented showed surveillance, warrant, additional, reliability: identified 'informant' operations; Spinelli, bookmaker,5 frequent Certainly, 91 policeman's judged essay contest. 'abracadabra.'6 recognizes, evaluation. viewed, affirmed. STEWART, substantially Brothers therefore judgment. portion statute reads: '(a) Whoever interstate foreign commerce uses facility intent to— claim. arises Instead, execute until apartment, lock door, hallway. point, arrested, key demanded him, commenced. plainly inside 267, 734, (1960), preferred delay arrest stepped hallway—especially managed gain surrender key. consequence Commissioner. 'It elementary passing attention.' 1511 (emphasis original). argue whatever arrest, justifying resultant period Louis noon late afternoon. offices stockbroker period. analysis answer basically considers issue. box un nstalled execution established, Thus, 104, 743 (1965), repeated deliveries loads sugar 60-pound bags, smelled odor fermenting mash, "sounds motor pump of' Ventresca's house.' Again, 303—304, 1058 (1967) "was selling vicinity 47th Calumet." arrived intersection, engaging various 1058. becomes unnecessary decide executed, 'The knock night, prelude authority solely commentary history condemned inconsistent conception enshrined documents English-speaking peoples.' 1361 Rabinowitz, 339 56, 69—70, 430, 436—437, 94 653 (1950) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting). N. Lasson, History Development Constitution (1937). 13—14, 368—369, Warden, Md. Penitentiary Hayden, 387 294, 1642, 782 (1967). 493, 499, 1253, 1257, 1514 1652 (concurring opinion). alone 'much scepticism history.' 271, 736, Time, Inc. Hill, 385 374, 418, 534, 557, 456 (dissent) (relating jury instructions).

Category: 0