Document: 514 U.S. 208115 S.Ct. 1446131 L.Ed.2d 324 Fred A. WHITAKERv.SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY (MERRILL REESE, INC., Real Party in Interest). No. 94-7743. Supreme Court of the United States April 17, 1995. PER CURIAM. 1 Pro se petitioner Whitaker has filed a petition for writ certiorari and requests leave to proceed forma pauperis under Rule 39 this Court. Pursuant 39.8, we deny petitioner's request pauperis.* Petitioner is allowed until May 8, 1995, pay docketing fees required by 38 submit his compliance with Court's 33. For reasons explained below, also direct Clerk not accept any further petitions from noncriminal matters unless he pays submits 2 prolific filer Since 1987, 24 relief, including 6 extraordinary relief 18 certiorari. Fifteen twenty-four have been last four Terms, denied all without recorded dissent. We pursuant 39.8 three which sought relief. See In re Whitaker, 513 ----, 115 570, 130 488 (1994); 511 ---, 114 2098, 128 661 506 113 489, 121 428 (1992). And earlier Term, directed "not writs fee 38(a) 33." U.S., at S.Ct., 570. Though warned that time about "frequent filing patterns respect certiorari," ibid., limited our sanction writs. 3 now find it necessary extend petitioner. what appears be an attempt circumvent prior order, labeled instant "petition certiorari" even though would seem more aptly termed writ": argues California erred denying review Appeals order mandate/prohibition seeking compel trial judge make particular ruling civil action legal arguments makes are, just as those made previous certiorari, frivolous. As told "[t]he goal fairly dispensing justice . compromised when forced devote its resources processing repetitious frivolous requests." Ibid. (internal quotation marks citation omitted). 4 Petitioner's abuse occurred only cases, limit accordingly. This therefore will prevent challenge criminal sanctions might imposed upon him. But like other similar orders issued, see Sassower, 510 2, 126 (1993); Day v. Day, 4, Demos Storrie, 507 1231, 122 636 Martin District Columbia Appeals, 397, 305 (1992), allow claims petitioners who abused process. 5 It so ordered. Justice STEVENS, dissenting. 7 A simple denial adequately serve laudable conserving "limited resources." Ante, ____. generally (1994) (STEVENS, J., dissenting). 8 I respectfully * provides: "If satisfied jurisdictional statement, or writ, case may be, malicious, motion "

Category: 1