Document: 381 U.S. 618 85 S.Ct. 1731 14 L.Ed.2d 601 Victor LINKLETTER, Petitioner,v.Victor G. WALKER, Warden. No. 95. Argued March 11, 1965. Decided June 7, Euel A. Screws, Jr., Montgomery, Ala., for petitioner. Teddy W. Airhart, Baton Rouge, La., respondent. H. Richard Uviller, New York City, National District Attorneys' Association, as amicus curiae. Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of Court. 1 In Mapp v. Ohio, 367 643, 81 1684, 6 1081 (1961), we held that exclusion evidence seized in violation search and seizure provisions Fourth Amendment was required States by Due Process Clause Fourteenth Amendment. so doing overruled Wolf People State Colorado, 338 25, 69 1359, 93 L.Ed. 1782 (1949), to extent it failed apply exclusionary rule States.1 This case presents question whether this requirement operates retrospectively upon cases finally decided period prior Mapp. The Court Appeals Fifth Circuit did not, 323 F.2d granted certiorari order settle what has become a most troublesome administration justice.2 377 930, 84 1340, 12 295. We agree with Appeals. 2 petitioner convicted Louisiana on May 28, 1959, 'simple burglary.' At time his arrest he had been under surveillance two days suspect connection another burglary. He taken police station, searched, keys were from person. After booked placed jail, other officers took keys, entered searched home, certain property papers. Later place business seizures effected. These intrusions made without warrant. arresting reasonable cause law finding probable an incident valid. Supreme affirmed February 1960. 3 On 19, 1961, announced. Immediately thereafter filed application habeas corpus state court basis writ being denied courts, then like United denial there appealed affirmed. It found searches too remote therefore illegal but constitutional not retrospective. Petitioner points: (1) erred holding retrospective; (2) even though be operate retrospectively, subsequent Mapp, while final conviction long our disposition it, should nevertheless governed 4 Initially must consider term 'retrospective' purposes opinion. A ruling which is purely prospective does parties before court.3 See, e.g., England Board Medical Examiners, 375 411, 461, 11 440 (1964). See also Great Northern Ry. Co. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co., 287 358, 53 145, 77 360 (1932). However, are here concerned pure prospectivity since applied announced reverse Miss Mapp's conviction. That decision still pending direct review at rendered.4 Therefore, case, only principle enunciated applies convictions final5 rendition I. 5 While some may seem 'academic' might helpful others us briefly outline history theory problem presented. common no authority proposition judicial decisions future.6 Blackstone stated duty 'pronounce new law, maintain expound old one.' Blackstone, Commentaries (15th ed. 1809).7 followed Norton Shelby County, 118 425, 1121, 30 178 (1886),8 unconstitutional action 'confers rights; imposes duties; affords protection; creates office; is, legal contemplation, inoperative never passed.' 442, 1125. judge rather than creator its discoverer. Gray, Nature Sources Law 222 (1st 1909). decision, supra, here, thought failure true discovery consequently law; overruling one, 'new theretofore been, law.' Shulman, Retroactive Legislation, 13 Encyclopaedia Social Sciences 355, 356 (1934). 7 hand, Austin maintained judges do fact something more discover they make interstitially filling interpretation vague, indefinite, or generic statutory common-law terms alone empty crevices law. Implicit such approach admission when earlier wrongly decided. erased later considered existing juridical until overruled, intermediate disturbed. 8 Blackstonian view ruled English jurisprudence cast shadow over own evidenced supra. philosophers continued insist out tune actuality largely because repeal ofttime 'work hardship those who (had) trusted existence.' Cardozo, Address N.Y. Bar Assn., 55 Rep.N.Y. Assn. 263, 296—297 Austinian gained acceptance hundred years ago although legislative divorces void, previously immunized case. Bingham Miller, 17 Ohio 445 (1848). And early 1863 drew same concept Gelpcke City Dubuque, Wall. 175, 520 (1863). Iowa repeatedly Legislature power authorize municipalities issue bonds aid construction railroads. Dubuque issued bonds, reversed itself legislature lacked power. Gelpcke, arose after apparent collectible. 'However regard late (overruling) affecting future, can have effect past.' 206. was, Holmes Kuhn Fairmont Coal 215 349, 371, 140, 148 (1910), 'that change contract faith one way 1932 Cardozo 360, denying federal due process attack Montana said 'may choice between forward operation relation backward.' 364, 148. based avoidance 'injustice hardship' citing list supporting courts say 'are none less transactions.' Eight Chief Hughes Chicot County Drainage Dist. Baxter Bank, 308 60 317, 329 (1940), discussing clear broad statements Norton, 'must qualifications.' reasoned actual existence determination unconstitutionality 'is operative consequences cannot justly ignored. past always declaration.' laid down 'effect invalidity various aspects.' 374, 319. 9 One form limited retroaction differs somewhat type discussed above established Schooner Peggy, Cranch 103, 49 (1801). There, schooner President commanded any armed French vessel high seas captured. An condemnation September 23, 1800. signed agreement France providing captured 'definitively condemned' restored. Marshall said: 10 'It general province appellate enquire judgment rendered erroneous not. But if court, intervenes positively changes governs, obeyed, obligation * (and) where individual rights sacrificed national decide according laws, necessary set aside aside.' 110. subsequently instances intervened, Carpenter Wabash R. 309 416, 558 (1940); amendment adopted, Chambers, 291 217, 54 434, 78 763 (1934);9 altered Vandenbark Owens-Illinois Glass 311 538, 61 347, 327 (1941).10 Under appears will given review, supra,11 judgments collaterally attacked subject 'principle absolute retroactive invalidity' depends consideration 'particular relations particular conduct claimed vested, status, determinations deemed finality'; 'of public policy light nature both statute previous application.' U.S., distinction drawn civil criminal litigation shown language used Jones, 44 N.M. 623, 107 P.2d 324 (1940) James States, 366 213, 1052, 246 (1961). latter Commissioner Wilcox, 404, 66 546, 90 752 (1946), 'in manner prejudice relied it.'12 221 1056. Thus, accepted today appropriate interest justice prospective. 'there much favor arising future.' Mosser Darrow, 341 267, 276, 71 680, 684 (dissenting Black, J.). deal statutes overturning rules seems impediment—constitutional philosophical—to use area exigencies situation require application. heretofore, discussion, finalized promulgation rule.13 contends method resolving demonstrates prevails adjudication. believe Constitution neither prohibits nor requires retrospective effect. As said, 'We think Federal voice subject.'14 15 Once premise apply, prohibited applying, weigh merits demerits each looking question, purpose effect, further retard operation. particularly correct reference Amendment's prohibitions unreasonable seizures. Rather 'disparaging' wisdom '(t)he life logic: experience.' Holmes, Common (Howe 1963).15 II. 16 Since Weeks 232 383, 34 341, 58 652 (1914), adhered admissible trial court. 1949 right privacy—'the core Amendment'—was basic implicit 'the ordered liberty' thus enforceable against through Amendment, ways enforcing raise questions different order. How arbitrary checked, remedies afforded, means effective, all dogmatically answered preclude varying solutions spring allowable range issues susceptible quantitative solution.' 27—28 1361. went 'derived explicit requirements *. matter implication.' 'we find English-speaking world vital protection obtained, hesitate treat remedy essential ingredient right.'16 29, 1362. granting practice' 'an effective deterring searches,' concluded could 'condemn falling below minimal standards assured State's reliance methods which, consistently enforced, would equally effective.' 31, 1363. continuance excused ground reasons 'compelling' community exerted oppressive local far effectively throughout country. 18 'asymmetry imported into law,' 670, 1700 (concurring Douglas, J.), indicated day, Lustig 74, 1372, 1819 authorities 'on silver platter' excludable trials. 79, 1374. Wolf's holding, conjunction 'silver doctrine Lustig, provided wide avenues abuse Weeks' courts. Evidence turned admitted prosecutions 1951 strengthened Stefanelli Minard, 342 117, 72 118, 96 138, refused permit enjoin proceeding illegally officers. 1952, however, tolerate procedure involved Rochin California, 165, 205, 183, morphine capsules pumped accused's stomach struck grounds shocking conscience. 1954 came Irvine 347 128, 74 381, 98 561, procured via microphone secreted clandestinely bedroom. 'incredible' circumstances sufficiently shock conscience applying test. Instead off Wolf. Jackson announcing urged 'applies produce minds mild shock, serious, states exclude conviction.' 133 134, 383—384. strongly reaffirmed stating: 19 'Now known them, wish reconsider their evidentiary rules. upset adequate opportunity adopt reject unwarranted power.' 384. 20 dealing remembered invoking prevent punish recognized crime. Rejection nothing wrong-doing official, may, likely will, release defendant. (It) protect innocent persons victims fruitless searches.' 136, 385. Admitting futility available searches, suggested 'Clerk directed copy record together opinion, attention Attorney General States' prosecution Civil Rights Act, 62 Stat. 696, U.S.C. § 242 (1958 ed.). concurring writer displeasure observed 'still refuses today' overrule felt bound hopes 'strict adherence tenor needed converts extinction.' 138—139, 387. broaden when, 1956, agent enjoined transferring warrant, testifying prosecution. Rea 350 214, 76 292, 100 233. 1960 Court's dissatisfaction doctrine, led rejection leading Elkins 364 206, 80 1437, 1669. factual converse tightened noose strangle completely agents. emphasized 'calculated prevent, repair. Its deter—to compel respect guaranty way—by removing incentive disregard it.'17 217 1444. 21 1961. considering current validity based' pointed 'almost two-thirds opposed rule, now, despite half passing wholly partly adopted rule.' 651 1689. cited California typical adopting "compelled reach conclusion," quoting California's highest "because secure compliance *.' Cahan, 1955, Cal.2d 445, 282 905, 911, 50 A.L.R.2d 513. *' experience worthless futile buttressed States. obvious relegating has, moreover, 652—653, 1689—1690. Defore, 13, 150 N.E. 585, heavily relied, 'Likewise, face called 'weighty testimony' Defore (t)he stands either strict lax.' N.Y., page 22, N.E., 588.' 653 1690. force reasoning vitiated Court,' 653, 1690, closed courtroom doors 'open secured official lawlessness save 655, 1691. door 22 recapitulation, rested these grounds. First, 'contrariety views 'particularly impressive.' Second, "other protection' (of rights) afforded' rule. And, third, first, lineup shifted majority favored it; second, proven 'worthless futile' reduced incidence during operated license illegality; and, laxity complained affirmatively part Amendments' Amendment; stop needless 'shopping around' causing conflict permitted Wilson Schnettler, 365 632, 620 (1961); withdraw invitation extended step across street state's attorney evidence, eliminating practice tended destroy entire system restraints liberties people rest; promote state-federal cooperation enforcement rejecting double standard admissibility tends breed suspicion among officers, encourages disobedience participants violates imperative integrity.' 657—660, 1692—1694. short, just deterrent safeguard Silverthorne Lumber 251 385, 40 182, 64 319 (1920), bottomed necessity 'sanction (the Amendment's) enjoyment dependent Boyd, cases.' 655 1692. rationale ad hoc participated search. Only few many following were, using violate proscription itself. noted 'further delay (applying States) compound difficulties'; definitive increased number involving non-exclusionary enticed column position, done III. 23 thousands obliterated. conduct, private official,' considered. Here 'prior finality acted accordingly' 'become vested.' finally, 'public (Wolf doctrine) application' proper weight. Ibid. look rule; doctrine; 24 Court, once Search Seizure applicable included within command negative. considerations heretofore process. prime inclusion rights. This, found, lawless action. Indeed, requiring advanced making misconduct already occurred corrected releasing prisoners involved. Nor add harmony delicate relationship spoken parcel Finally, ruptured privacy victims' homes effects Reparation comes late. 25 accused seek reparation privacy. Some pursued same. Monroe Pape, 167, 473, 492 addition, Irvine, flag warned stormy weather. command. Final Again again gave approval hundreds deter enforce date served wholesale guilty victims. 26 interests integrity consider. To tax utmost. Hearings excludability destroyed, misplaced deteriorated. If excluded, witnesses original located memory dimmed. legitimate extraordinary procedural weapon bearing guilt seriously disrupt justice. 27 urged, areas,18 notably coerced confessions, should, therefore, dignity Two cited, Fay Noia, 372 391, 83 822, 837 (1963), Reck Pate, 433, 1541, 948 apposite. trials lapse former. table all. confession predated arrests well cases. Brown Mississippi, 297 278, 56 682 (1936). There Moreover, confessions excluded 'a complex values,' Blackburn Alabama, 361 199, 274, (1960), including likelihood untrue'; preservation individual's freedom will'; "(t)he abhorrence society involuntary confessions." 207, 280. Cited Denno, 378 368, 385—386, 1774, 1785 unreliability coercion present search-and-seizure abhorrent specifically authorized Wolf.19 Furthermore, admittedly sole availability conviction, post-conviction exhausted appeal Nothing kind whatever Noia Reck, matter. three areas retrospectively20 fairness trial—the very fact-finding Here, out, attack. All attacks reliability relevancy questioned outcome. 28 accept contention day there, significance. changed crucial date. better cutoff time. 29 error fundamental overturn it. full factors able Affirmed. 31 BLACK, whom DOUGLAS joins, dissenting. 32 held, now concedes, Linkletter presently prison serving nine-year sentence hard labor burglary 1959 obtained unreasonably Amendments. 'all authority, inadmissible court.' Stating 1782, add: 33 'In important privilege, namely, forced give reason unlawful seizure. hold otherwise grant reality withhold privilege enjoyment.' 656, S.Ct., Despite resounding promises 'unconstitutional evidence' "find sanction courts," Linkletter, evidence,' relief became 'final' stay jail; whose offense committed Linkletter's, free. treatment points up discriminatory contrivance utilized break promise keeping jail unfortunate enough 35 1957; Linkletter's year August 16, 1958. tried Louisiana, convicted, affirmed, rehearing 21, 1960, about seven months committed. approximately her offense. proceeded expedition slowly 'finally' definition Court—which ample petition virtually automatic offers defense discriminating defendants similarly unconstitutionally seized. certainly crime she charged his, yet rest fanciful protected 1957 1958 assumes virtue acting comment experience.'1 talking Constitution; evolving judge-made allowed follow tradition. member ever criticized reading predilections 'vague contours' Clause.2 quite apart that, justifies Court-made perpetrate grossly invidious unfair discrimination simply happened prosecuted evidently docket. logic—sterile formal that—not, dependable guide lawmaking. 36 When get beyond works situated better. I 'new' admits, must, Ante, p. 628. refers followed. For example, Griffin Illinois, 351 12, 891, pauper indigency, suggestion future only. Id., 25—26, 594—595. 1935, dissents Justices 1956 determine constitutionality petitioner's 1935 Eskridge Washington Parole Bd., etc., 357 1061, 1269. 37 Interesting abstractly, arguments 'make' 'discover' performing interpreting Constitution. 319, 329, joined, allinclusive statement justified.' situations chose only, constitution voice' forbidding them so. Ref. 148, 360. cf. 372, 228 opinion). stating position resulted respected notwithstanding declared unconstitutional: 38 'The declaration. aspects,—with relations, corporate, official. Questions accordingly, application, demand examination.' 318. 39 Thus 95 927, created entirely imposing heavy financial liability trustee bankruptcy acts performed perfectly valid dissented, my belief 'much liability) future,' 684, trustees good past. 246, Douglas objections having peculiar field 'should prospectively.' major way: 'Our trouble aspect indicate passed substantially amend 41 great inherent departure enter lawmaking 224—225, 1058—1059. 42 adhere James, expressing opposition interpretations laws prospectively. Doubtless events lead unjust Chicot, ignored.' No possibly result giving him benefit languishing concededly convict him. 'vested interest' recognize keep jail. usual prison. 43 refusing expresses 'approach seizures,' indicating disparaging leaves me puzzled recent opinions indispensable protections 629. Then goes pattern balancing away Bill guarantees balances away3 safeguards reasonably expected 837, opened collateral 'final.' Even process, resting conducted conformity ante, 628, first instance jurisdiction, defendant expansive interpretation. am loss understand why suffer treated differently Rights. Speaking guaranteed Amendments four ago, that: 45 '* longer remain promise. Because Clause, revocable whim officer who, name itself, chooses suspend enjoyment. Our founded truth, gives 660, 1694. (Emphasis supplied.) 46 evidence.' brought seeking challenge obtained. confession. Noia's reached 948, 1936 47 Quite positive 'like *,' cases, Boyd 116 616, 524, 746. reaching conclusion nin prohibition compelling man witness himself. self-incrimination justification whole Court4 person determining what, entitled protection. Plymouth Sedan Commonwealth Pennsylvania, 380 693, 703, 1246, 1252 48 express quoted numerous places amendments inseparable standpoint two, '(T)he least assure sphere 657, "(C)onviction enforced *." 648, 1688. 51 appearing originally 392, 344, 652. Weeks, time, relying greatly Boyd's precisely category. Yet chain circuitous degrades excluding confessions. philosophy denies free 1957. 52 reason—perhaps one—put refusal repeated sheriffs, policemen, inference gather accorded sort punishment depriving purpose, reason, object sounds construing Compare 661, 1694 Both members seemed aspect, undoubted implication today's mere punishing rod startling opinions, disapproval, saying clearly accused." read reread unable word intended except Certainly limitation implied rule: assurance words,' valueless undeserving mention perpetual charter inestimable human "implicit liberty,'" id., 1691, 'essential ingredient' guarantee. 651, plan 'ordered liberty,' frequently have, possible justify wanton 'constitutional accused'? says rule's preventing 'will victims.' 637. thing cut escape. probably difficult defendants. premise, suppose, Rights' faithfully judge's safeguards. Such maxim. answer argument allow criminals go free, conceded undoubtedly result. sets government quickly observe worse, 659, 1693. IV. 57 'To justice.' pp. 637-638. heard 'such weapon' inveigh against. Indeed lengths explain exhaustive notable worthwhile designed behind glance briefs reveal rejected justifying What dissenting would, justice.5 merely men disregarded. sound put dedicated provides. 59 Little consolation gathered languish late.' His claim 'too late' Noia's.6 plain facts cuts hope convictions. beats timid retreat wholesome refreshing principles Noia. vested officials. Careful analysis shows rests assumed sustaining old, repudiated outweighs individuals wrongful aside. offends sense adjudged words obscure simple broken here. reverse. Although disturb right. split developed appeals concerning retrospectivity Hall Warden, 313 483 (C.A.4th Cir. 1963) (retroactive); Walker Peppersack, 316 119 Hurst, 325 891 (C.A.9th (retroactive), Gaitan 317 494 (C.A.10th (prospective); Walker, (C.A.5th Sisk Lane, 331 235 (C.A.7th 1964) ex rel. Angelet Fay, 333 (C.A.2d (prospective). About point foreclose question. almost unanimously Beltowski Tahash, 266 Minn. 123 N.W.2d cert. denied, 947, 278 (1963); Moore State, 274 Ala. 147 So.2d 835 (1962), 374 811, 1700, 1034 Muller, N.Y.2d 154, 227 N.Y.S.2d 421, 182 N.E.2d 99, 371 850, 89, 86 (1962). Commentators retroactivity. Bender, Effect Overruling Constitutional Decision: 110 U.Pa.L.Rev. 650 (1962); Freund, Vistas Law, 112 631 (1964); Traynor, Large Fifty 1962 Duke L.J. 319; Weinstein, Local Responsibility Improvement Practices, Rocky Mt.L.Rev. Note, Collateral Attack Pre-Mapp Convictions Based Illegally Obtained Courts, Rutgers L.Rev. 587 Prospective Application Yale 907 Contra, Currier, Time Change Judge-Made Law: Overruling, Va.L.Rev. 201 (1965); Meador, Habeas Corpus 'Retroactivity' Illusion, 1115 Torcia King, Mirage Retroactivity Changing Concepts, Dick.L.Rev. 269 prevented Article III technique overruling. 907, 933 see 1A Moore, Practice 4082—4084 (2d 1961); n. 2, 216—220. doubt expressed 20, 591, (1956) Frankfurter, Ker 1623, 726 Fahy Connecticut, 85, 229, 171 Stoner 376 483, 889, 856 By mean rendered, exhausted, elapsed Ohio. 'I know general, shall future. Judicial near thousand years.' (1910) foremost exponent declaratory theory, similar Sir Matthew Hale History published birth Blackstone. 206 interesting note, 1801, 49, 'if (in court) governs maintains establishes retroactivity Respondent, contends, i.e., necessarily invoked 'Because prosecution, builds Peggy principle, penal judgment. regarded indication wants punished, regardless place, criminal.' 914 diversity incorporated Erie Tompkins, 304 64, 817, 82 1188. 'A sitting entry lower 915 Blaauw Grand Trunk Western 127, 806, 792 (1965). Accord, (intervening change); 538 541—542, 349—350 (1941); Dinsmore Southern Express 183 115, 120, 45, 46, 111 (1901) Crozier Fried. Krupp Aktiengesellschaft, 224 290, 308, 488, 492, 771 (1912) change). however voted Wilcox James' element willfulness failing include embezzled funds gross income misappropriation contained gloss alleged committed.' 221—222, 1057. Black concurred reversal taxable disagreed done. '(O)ne departments Government realized function Congress continue exercised system.' 225, 1058. 275, 927 (1951), retroactively. discussion 2; 907. Prison Board, 1269 (1958), (1956), furnish transcripts indigents appeal, Gideon Wainwright, 335, 792, 799 counsel appointed represent indigent felony, actually remedies. Doughty Maxwell, 202, 702, 908 (1964), confession, McNerlin 575, 1933, 1041 contended supports 1937 released judged forth Marshall, (1932) (referring court's decision). 661—662, 1694—1695 (1961) detailed pointing Appendix regarding catalogued, Wolf—26 224—225 1448—1453. judicially negate.' 39—40, 1367. lack integral (State's) adjudicating innocence defendant.' 590. Precluding inability pay analogized poor fair trial. layman, how intelligent, claims adequately. reliability. hearing apparatus voluntariness. White grave doubts ability jury uncertain. 1963). Adkins Children's Hosital, 261 525, 568, 394, 405, 67 785 Judge Marshall). joined Waite, agreed barred subpoena production man's papers him; Miller authorizing violated 638, 536. 852 (Clark, J., dissenting). 'Surely fair-minded contend deprived liberty ought codefendants Caminito Bonino, victim own; surely humane whereby Bonino coerced, remains life. anomalies, affronts civilized society,

Category: 0