Document: 365 U.S. 705 81 S.Ct. 855 6 L.Ed.2d 36 INTERNATIONAL TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION, AFL-CIO, Haverhill Typographical Union No. 38 and Worcester 165, Petitioners,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. 340. Argued March 1, 1961. Decided April 17, Rehearing Denied May 29, See 366 941, 1658. Mr. Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Washington, D.C., for petitioners. Dominick L. Manoli, respondent. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of Court. 1 This case involves a controversy that started in 1956 between petitioner Local 165 Telegram Gazette. The two unions insisted collective bargaining agreements were being negotiated contain clauses or provisions to which each employer objected. as it reaches here is reduced clauses: first, hiring composing room be hands foreman; he must member union; but union 'shall not discipline foreman carrying out written instructions publisher his representatives authorized by this Agreement'; second, General Laws International shall govern relations parties if they are 'not conflict with state federal law.' unions' demand these included agreement led deadlock negotiations turn resulted strike. 2 employers filed charges Board, complaints issued, cases consolidated, hearings held. Board concluded demands strikes supporting them violations Act. It found contract those was refusal bargain collectively within meaning § 8(b)(3) National Labor Relations Act, amended Taft-Hartley 61 Stat. 136, 140—141, 29 U.S.C. 158(b)(3), U.S.C.A. 158(b)(3). striking force acceptance an attempt make discriminate favor members contrary command 8(b)(2) also 'foreman clause' restraining coercing selection their adjustment grievances violation 8(b)(1)(B) 123 N.L.R.B. 806. Court Appeals enforced Board's order apart from features material here. Cir., 278 F.2d 6. on certiorari, 364 878, 166, 5 101. 3 What we have said v. News Syndicate Co., 695, 849, dispositive clause incorporates parent On phrase judgment below reversed. 4 CLARK WHITTAKER dissent, substantially reasons stated Appeals, We then over clause.' As whether strike obtain permissible, equally divided. Accordingly phase affirmed. Reversed part affirmed part. 7 FRANKFURTER took no consideration decision case. 8 HARLAN, whom STEWART joins, concurring. 9 I join Court's upon basis set forth my concurring opinions 339, 703, 854, Nos. 64 85, 357, Brotherhood Teamsters, etc. 677, 840.

Category: 6