Document: 533 U.S. 353121 S.Ct. 2304150 L.Ed. 2d 398 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of United States Reports. Readers are requested notify Reporter Decisions, Supreme Court States, Washington, D. C. 20543, any typographical or other errors, order that corrections may be made goes press.NEVADA, et al., PETITIONERSv.FLOYD HICKS, al. No. 99-1994 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES June 25, 2001Argued March 21, 2001 Syllabus Respondent Hicks a member Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribes western Nevada and lives on Tribes' reservation. After petitioner state game wardens executed state-court tribal-court search warrants Hicks's home for evidence an off-reservation crime, he filed suit Tribal against, inter alios, their individual capacities Nevada, alleging trespass, abuse process, violation constitutional rights remediable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The held it had jurisdiction over tribal tort federal civil claims, Appeals affirmed. Petitioners then sought, Federal District Court, declaratory judgment lacked claims. granted respondents summary issue would have exhaust qualified immunity claims Court. In affirming, Ninth Circuit concluded fact tribe-owned reservation land sufficient support against nonmembers arising from activities land. Held: 1. did not adjudicate wardens' alleged tortious conduct executing warrant crime. Pp. 3-12. (a) As nonmembers, court's inherent adjudicatory authority at most as broad tribe's regulatory authority. Strate v. A-1 Contractors, 520 438, 453. 3-4. (b) rule that, where concerned, "the exercise power beyond what necessary protect self-government control internal relations cannot survive without express congressional delegation," Montana 450 544, 564, applies both Indian non-Indian land's ownership status only one factor considered, while sometimes dispositive, alone enough nonmembers. 4-6. (c) regulate officers process related laws essential relations. State's interest considerable, no more impairs than enforcement law government. diminished because this officials capacities. 6-11. (d) Congress has stripped reservations with regard violations law. statutory scheme neither prescribes nor suggests enter investigate prosecute such violations. 11-12. 2. §1983 courts "general jurisdiction." historical assumption concurrent cases involving statutes missing respect courts, adjudicative legislative jurisdiction. purported grant create serious anomalies 28 1441. 12-15. 3. were required bringing them Because lack causes action relating performance official duties clear, adherence exhaustion requirement serve purpose delay therefore unnecessary. 15-16. 4. Various arguments contrary merit. 16-21.196 F.3d 1020, reversed remanded. ON WRIT CERTIORARI TO OFAPPEALS FOR NINTH CIRCUIT Scalia, J., delivered which Rehnquist, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, JJ., joined. Justice Scalia 1 case presents question whether court assert who entered execute tribe suspected having violated outside 2 * Hicks1 about 900 members Nevada. He resides approximately 8000 acres, established by statute 1908, ch. 53, 35 Stat. 85. 1990 came suspicion killed, off reservation, California bighorn sheep, gross misdemeanor law, see Nev. Rev. §501.376 (1999). A warden obtained "SUBJECT OBTAINING APPROVAL FROM FALLON TRIBAL IN AND PAIUTE-SHOSHONE TRIBES." According issuing judge, authorization was "[t]his Reservation." App. G Pet. Cert. court, warden, accompanied police officer, searched respondent's yard, uncovering head Rocky Mountain bighorn, different (and unprotected) species sheep. 3 Approximately year later, officer reported observed two mounted sheep heads home. again court; though explicitly require permission Tribes, F 2, nonetheless secured, (unsuccessfully) three additional officers. 4 Respondent, claiming his sheep-heads been damaged, second exceeded bounds warrant, brought Judge, officers, capacities, State Tribes. (His all defendants except dismissed directed verdict here.) Respondent's included trespass chattels, specifically, denial equal protection, due unreasonable seizure, each See 8-21, 25-29. later voluntarily leaving those id., 32-35. 5 holding affirmed district seeking respondent jurisdiction, also court. affirmed, concluding located within 196 1020 We certiorari, 531 923 (2000). II 6 case, involves determine, former, crime; and, latter, address former first. 7 principle central aspect our 453 (1997): "As does exceed its ." That formulation leaves open nonmember equals jurisdiction.2 will answer if we determine event case. first inquire, therefore, either sovereignty, can 8 tribes' governed principles set forth 544 (1981), called "pathmarking case" subject, Strate, supra, 445. deciding Crow Tribe could hunting fishing fee simple decision Oliphant Suquamish Tribe, 435 191 (1978), tribes criminal Although, continued, "Oliphant determined matters, relied general proposition sovereign powers do extend tribe." U.S., 565 (footnote omitted). Where "exercise inconsistent dependent tribes, so delegation." Id., 564 (emphasis added).3 9 Both rejected nonmembers' "assert landowner's right occupy exclude," 456; Montana, 557, 564. Respondents argue since yard make condition entry. Not necessarily. While certainly true analysis reason suspends proposition" derived tribe" extent "necessary relations." 564-565. itself drew distinctions based And after announcing cautioned "[t]o sure, retain some forms non-Indians reservations, even lands," clearly implying land, words, consider determining regulation It dispositive factor. Hitherto, absence virtually conclusive jurisdiction; minor exception, never upheld extension Compare, e.g., Merrion Jicarilla Apache 455 130, 137, 142 (1982) (tribe taxing lands leased nonmembers), Atkinson Trading Co. Shirley, 532 ___ (2001) (slip op. 13) fee); but Brendale Confederated Bands Yakima Nation, 492 408, 443-444, 458-459 (1989) (opinions Stevens, Blackmun, J.) impose zoning 3.1% area closed public entry owned tribe). But existence 10 proceed consider, successively, following questions: present context relations," not, congressionally conferred. B 11 explained understood looking examples referred: "[to punish offenders,] membership, domestic among members, prescribe rules inheritance members," 459 (brackets original), quoting These show, said, Indians " 'the own ruled them,' 459, Williams Lee, 358 217, 220 (1959). Fisher Sixteenth Judicial Dist. Mont., 424 382, 386 (1976) (per curiam) ("In litigation between out resolution conflicts depended, absent governing Act Congress, infringed them" (internal quotation marks citation omitted)). assertion must connected them. Merrion, ("The tax attribute sovereignty instrument self-government," least "tribal lands" "has nonmember"). 12 Our clear Indians' exclude end reservation's border. Though often referred "sovereign" entities, "long ago" departed Chief Marshall's view [a State] force' boundaries. Worcester Georgia, 515, 561 (1832)," White Bracker, 448 136, 141 (1980).4 "Ordinarily," now "an considered part territory State." Dept. Interior, Law 510, n. (1958), citing Utah & Northern R. Fisher, 116 (1885); Organized Village Kake Egan, 369 60, 72 (1962). 13 say exert same degree they without. To contrary, requires accommodation interests Government, hand, State, other." Washington Colville Reservation, 447 134, 156 (1980); 181 (opinion J.). "When on-reservation issue, generally inapplicable, likely minimal encouraging strongest." 144. When, however, implicated, exemplified selling cigarettes off-reservation, collecting cigarette tax. collect "impose 'minimal' burdens retailer aid enforcing tax," 151. well precedent crimes committed (as poaching case) Mescalero Jones, 411 145, 148-149 (1973). 14 entirely last mentioned entails corollary (including Indian-fee lands) purposes, several opinions point direction. reserved seize sale recover taxes due. 162. Co., "[i]t [state] run into kind, subject-matter controversy otherwise cognizance," 31.5 Shortly thereafter, Kagama, 118 375 (1886), enact giving various common-law, violent State. expressed skepticism Commerce Clause justify derogation ultimately accepted argument 15 "does interfere operation upon white people found there. Its effect confined acts tribe, character, limits 16 "It seems us competency Congress." 383. 17 Court's references "process" concern Kagama possible encroachment prerogatives, suggest us. ("Process" defined "any means used acquire person specific property," Black's Dictionary 1084 (5th ed. 1979), equated 1085.) noteworthy recognized "operat[e] [non-Indians] found" similarly limit property scope courts. makes perfect sense, since, enclaves, "prevent [such areas] becoming asylum fugitives justice." Fort Leavenworth Lowe, 114 525, (1885).6 18 conclude today, accordance these prior statements, violation, them." execution when relates conceding Nevada's minimal, think, distinction capacity suits irrelevant. paraphrase Tennessee Davis, 100 257, 263 (1880), permitting remove proceedings actions, "can act through agents," "affix penalties done immediate direction government, obedience laws," operations government time arrested [tribe]." Cf. Anderson Creighton, 483 635, 638 (1987) ("Permitting damages entail substantial social costs, including risk fear personal monetary liability harassing unduly inhibit discharge duties"). C 19 States' course Draper 164 240, 242-243 (1896). here occurred. Government's "[a]s matter, although exclusively involve non-Indians, . perpetrators victims," Brief Amicus Curiae 12-13, 7, misleading. relies, 18-19 show half statement, like first, limited "crimes reservation." Sections 1152 1153 Title 18, give exclusive application, apply Country; Public 280, codified 1162 permits exception rule, limited. 25 2804 federal-state agreements enabling law-enforcement agents deputizing Nothing prescribes, remotely suggests, land) occurring 2806 affirms provisions chapter alter enforcement, investigative, judicial political subdivision agency thereof III 20 turn next contention Government entertain §1983.(FN7 jurisdiction" invoking statutes, §1983, specification contrary. "Under [our] system dual consistently authority, thus presumptively competent, States," Tafflin Levitt, 493 455, 458 (1990). assumed Framers, Federalist 82, pp. 492-493 (C. Rossiter 1961). Indeed, enforce presumed Article Constitution, lower all. federal-law completely 21 Respondents' quite wrong. general, "lays hold subjects parties dispute relative distant globe." 493. should 3-4.(FN8 proclaim certain questions See, 1911(a) (authority child custody disputes Child Welfare 1978); 1715z-13(g)(5) (jurisdiction mortgage foreclosure actions Secretary Housing Urban Development homeowners). provision provides actions. 22 Furthermore, anomalies, recognizes, federal-question removal refers Were cognizable inexplicably available seek forum. thinks omission reference §1441 unproblematic. Since, argues, doubtful intended deny given elect forum adjudication law," feel free defendant obtain federal-court injunction action, effectively forcing refiled 25-26. sole devising extraordinary remedy El Paso Natural Gas Neztsosie, 526 473 (1999), approved similar procedure Price-Anderson initially Navajo provided "shall deemed action[s] under"42 2210; there little doubt 482, propriety §1441, Act, 2210(n)(2). light Act's detailed distinctive handling "nuclear incident" 486, thought envisioned defendant's ability get instances. procedures, confront unspecified exists, apparent. Surely simpler way avoid problem indications anyway) suits. IV 23 petitioners jurisdictional National Farmers Union Ins. Cos. 471 845, 856-857 (1985). exceptions requirement, motivated desire harass conducted bad faith, patently violative prohibitions, futile adequate opportunity challenge jurisdiction," 856, None applicable added broader Strate: "[w]hen plain governance covered Montana's main rule," "would delay." 459-460, 14. too technically reasoning behind not. Since discussed, duties, delay," V 24 Finally, few words response concurring O'Connor, large dissent views opinion.9 principal concurrence "gives passing consideration officials' occurred controlled Tribe," post, 6. "that prominent analysis," 9. Even cursory reading demonstrates so. acknowledge analysis, significant "may dispositive," simply find weighed pursuing laws. (concluding "[t]he considerable" outweigh "even lands"). disagree judgment; failure determinative "fails adequately Tribe's land," J.), exaggeration. 26 marshals scant pursuing, Self-government directly here, apply, narrow category outsiders. try explain how allowing pursue "threatens direct integrity, economic security, health welfare tribe," 566. threaten affect guaranteed limitations fully subject. 27 exaggerates distorts consequences conclusion, 5, 3, term "other arrangements" passage "private consensual" arrangements include obtaining conclusion correct, fuller exposition clear: "To lands. regulate, taxation, licensing, means, consensual relationships commercial dealing, contracts, leases, arrangements." 565. 29 (this opinion, bear mind, statute) obviously mind acting governmental capacity; referring private individuals submitted themselves (or employers) into. confirmed four immediately involved actors. 152 (nonmember purchasers outlet); 217 (general store reservation); Morris Hitchcock, 194 384 (1904) (ranchers grazing livestock horses "under contracts said tribes"); Buster Wright, 135 F. 947, 950 (CA8 1905) (challenge "permit tax" charged privilege trading borders"). 30 concludes brief footnote discussion invalidate implied cessions contained state-tribal cooperative agreements, pertaining mutual assistance, administration paternity matters. 7-8 great overreaching. "a relationship [between exist," merely asserts officers' (unnecessary) warrant. Whether contractual expressly impliedly confer conferral effective arise another here. 31 Another exaggeration concurrence's "give freedom impunity solely officials," regulated; regulated duties. Action unrelated potentially depending outcome analysis. Moreover, acted unlawfully able invoke courts) vindicate federal- state-law rights. 32 comment final paragraphs Part bring stage, classic fashion, deus ex machina extract, seemingly insoluble difficulties writing created, happy ending. manages cake eat hand yet still assure traditional hence interest) protected officials, defenses reviewing Post, What wonderful magic. Without much (none available) declares inquiry inquiry, ken outset There problems declaration. true. whatever absolute- qualified-immunity pertain less (If presumably nonwaivable. Idaho Coeur d'Alene Idaho, 521 261, 267 (1997)). is, impossible know "immunity defenses" supposed consider. need State's; indeed, decide common until relatively recently) defense Acevedo, 500 565, 581 (1991) (Scalia, judgment). One wonders whether, deprived machina, reached I agree proper balancing 33 worth observing would, time, (which avoided) coextensive answered affirmative. Souter's separate demonstrates, surely deserves 34 restrict, condition, hear claim Nor identify claim. operating properly accountable 36 reversed, remanded further consistent opinion. 37 ordered. 38 Kennedy 39 40 judgment, Stevens Breyer, 41 NOTES: Hereinafter, "respondent." Judge respondents, "respondents" used. 855-856 (1985), avoided transactions, defendant. Typically, defendants. (1997), "where possess lies courts," distinguishing plaintiffs Iowa Mut. LaPlante, 480 9, (1987). leave general. "consensually" searching think qualifies arrangement" meaning passage. Read context, relationship, far removed. 1828 treaty Cherokee nation subjected Territory." 71 (1962); cf. 221-222 (1959) (comparing Worcester). meant "reservation kind," excluded treaty. Harkness Hyde, 98 476, 478 (1879); Kansas Indians, Wall. 737, 739-741 (1867). purely hypothetical demonstrated Arizona rel. Merrill Turtle, 413 F.2d 683 (CA9 1969), refused extradite Oklahoma forbade extradition neighboring States. (where located) suspect (among reasons) self-government, 685-686. why already 'state crime,' 1, latter determination Strate's qualifier: "[a]bsent enlarging [tribal-court jurisdiction]," must) enlargement. argues fundamentally law." earlier "federal contrary." fill role, "merely concerned circumstances nonmembers," 2-3, limitation pertains subject-matter, rather personal, turns regulable tribe. (in regulated) concept meaningless, assuredly criterion received O'Connor gone Questions Presented warden's "civil authority." 12. third Question Presented, Petn. Writ Certiorari i, follows: "Is [Montana], creating presumption cause arises tribe?" dealt tied best tracks former. merits briefing, petitioners' wardens. 36-44. whom Justices Thomas join, concurring. 43 petitioning join reach route. Like take source ___, (Souter, concurring). gives emphasis measuring legal conduct, ante, 6-11, go stops short defendants, exceptions, turning "consensual relationships," 566.1 44 applied reservation; where, trust explicit primary fact, relevant insofar bears application particular Insofar rest my presumption, follows me "limited 4, independently supporting (that matter 5) confined. 45 correct "[t]ribal ill-defined," Reply 16, pronouncements pointed opposite directions. Santa Clara Pueblo Martinez, 436 49, 65 (1978) ("Tribal repeatedly appropriate forums affecting important non-Indians"), Mazurie, 419 557 (1975) ("Indian unique aggregations possessing attributes territory"), with, 191, 209 (" '[T]he [tribes'] amounts every themselves' ") (quoting Fletcher Peck, Cranch 87, 147 (1810))). Oliphant, clarified tribal-courts' none non-Indians), seen step pathmarking concerning 445 (1997). path marked presumptive nonmembers.2 46 force resolve There, recognizing "raised [the of] reservation," noted "narrow one." 557. Specifically, presented "on Tribe." Ibid. Here, undisputed, complained "controlled 24. (and, accordingly, call result. animated preclusion counseling regulatory, adjudicatory, 47 began "inherent authority" noting lost many sovereignty." 563. "distinguish[ing] retained divested," portion Wheeler, 313, 326 quoted length: 48 'The areas implicit divestiture territorial necessarily external laws, type. They Thus, virtue status.' 49 passages (supplied me) underscores indicate, restriction preserved latter. invoked noted) imposed per se bar remarked "[t]hough relied" well, namely, Accordingly, pressed member-nonmember distinction, reiterating point, example, 564; Schlie, 1007, 1015 1976) (Kennedy, dissenting) power, unlike maintain nondesireable identity self-governing status"), rev'd sub nom. (1978). 50 confining appended First, "regulate second, 565-566.3 unless applies, governs "not 51 extended framework, originally measure repeated "absent treaty, exists circumstances." Quoting "[i]n main" outlined opinion), tribe' enjoys apart 'do tribe.' 445-446. Equally purposes treatment (1987), seemed expansive position cited nonmembers: 52 "Tribal sovereignty. 565-566 (1981); 152-153 [of Mont.], [382,] 387-389 [(1976)]. Civil affirmatively .' 18." 452. 53 fastened statement over" "presumptively courts." resisted overbreadth Mutual dictum. "scarcely supports defendants," 451-452, stressed "three informative citations" accompanying mark contours 54 "The points advanced tribe,' prime exceptions. listed illustrative conjunction 452 (citations omitted).Accordingly, explaining Mutual, indicated Montana: "activities trigger fit 55 undeniable remaining depends instance character claimed, title soil acted. decided (like them) looks human relationships, records, difference fee. membership unconsenting party, real property, counts fact.4 56 Limiting animating precedents, fits assumptions serves sound policy. history, sharp contrast always narrowly confined." 171 (dissenting opinion). His early treaties became known five civilized "specifically [but] specifically nonmembers." 171, (citing Treaty Cherokees, Art. 481 (1835), Choctaws Chickasaws, 612 (1855), Creeks Seminoles, 15, 703 (1856)). vein, 19th-century setting re Mayfield, 107, (1891), object" measures "to vest [Indian] controversies party proceeding, reserve citizens side." And, very day, prohibits Courts Offenses (tribunals organized systems) exercising Such "[c]ivil "in Indian, stipulation parties." CFR 11.103(a) 57 prohibiting arise, sense practical standpoint, tying produce unstable crazy quilt. constantly changes hands (from on), prove extraordinarily difficult administer provide notice whose susceptibility recent conveyances. Hodel Irving, 704, 718 (noting attend "extreme fractionation 58 begins ends, stressed, real, consequence special nature tribunals," Duro Reina, 495 676, 693 (1990), differ American number respects. start obvious one, century Bill Rights Fourteenth Amendment tribes. Talton Mayes, 163 376, 382-385 (1895); Cohen, Handbook 664-665 (1982 ed.) (hereinafter Cohen) states union tribes"). Although 1968 (ICRA) handful analogous safeguards enforceable 1302 guarantees identical," 194,5 "definite trend courts" toward "ha[ve] leeway interpreting" ICRA's protection clauses "need follow precedents 'jot-for-jot,' Newton, Praxis: Year Life Twenty Courts, Am. L. 285, 344, 238 (1998). event, squares policy considerations underlying overriding "protected unwarranted intrusions liberty," 210. 59 another) structure, substantive independence judges. modern "mirror "are guided written codes, rules, guidelines," frequently unwritten, being instead values, mores, norms customs, traditions, practices," "handed down orally example generation another." Melton, Indigenous Systems Society, 79 Judicature 126, 130-131 (1995). resulting complex "mix codes federal, state, Judges Assn., Future unusually outsider sort out. 60 Hence importance anticipate readily knowable plot confirms point. review mechanism place courts' decisions matters non-tribal judgments removed appealed Cf., 1441(a) (removal original jurisdiction"); §1257(a) (Supreme "judgments decrees rendered highest State" implicated). result, course, disuniformity interpretation underscored 'subordinate branches governments,' Duro, Cohen 334-335). 61 loose end. panel majority case." 1028 otherwise, remand law? room reasonable disagreement (O'Connor, judgment), balance opposing answers majority; substance, issues Appeals's My focus was, addressed (albeit unsympathetically), might approach applicability exception. Rymer her dissent, uncontested authorized service bars adversely affected integrity. F.3d, 1033-1034. alternative rationale outcome, pure formality. laying unquestionably future happened apparently here). "nonmembers" "non-Indians" interchangeably. 676 (i.e., tribes), passed granting 105 646, 1301(2). Because, statutorily conferred implicitly acknowledged nonmembership identified automatically foreclosed, require." 855 "Montana full prohibited Contractors 76 930, 937 1996). Instead, [Montana] went describe exceptions." irrelevant calculus, instance. Land status, instance, impact perhaps both) concurring); 151 (1980) ("[T]here geographic component sovereignty"). 667 ("Many governments [ICRA]"). 62 63 plainly states, Souter "holding Ante, Court); "leave[s] general," engaged venture frolic own, (a officer's "unrelated [performance duties] control"). 64 write separately emphasize 438 deferred larger issues. highway accident right-of-way For site equivalent alienated, 456. negligent driving amenable "express[ed] forum" 442. understand it, definitively left Strate. Breyer judgment. 66 holds majority's sweeping cause, undermines 'make them.' (1997) (1959)). unmoored precedents. 67 68 Today, finally resolves regardless ownership. fanfare, equivocated past. 69 nontribal geographical boundaries instances preserve applied. 565-567; 70 Given facts persons regulated, occurred, led develop subsequent cases, see, South Dakota Bourland, 508 679, 694-695, (1993), triggered 454, 8. years activity (2001). events 1999). "coherence manifestations non-Indians," op., 1) concurring), govern company majority, faithful progeny. repeating. announced explained, sovereignty: 73 arrangements. threatens exceptions" permit security Tribe. "readily agree[d]" prohibit belonging "if fish hunt lands, charging establishing limits." followed, uniformly regarded 74 doing business management." 137 (1982). distinct sources: exclude. 149. Recognizing 'unique sovereignty,' "subject constraints entities" away power. 140-141. 75 At 408 (1989), zone tracts garnered Members considering preserving welfare. 423-425, 428-432 (White, joined JJ.); 433-435, 443-444 (Stevens, J.); 454-455 (Blackmun, Brennan Marshall, JJ.). end, parcel turned maintained parcels located. 438-444, 444-447 confronted attempt acquired Flood Control Cheyenne River Act. 689-690. enactments absolute use occupation conveyed lands." 689. remand. 695-696. 77 lawsuit traffic delineated Again, accord considerable land." 454. "alienated, Applying allegedly constitute gave rise 456-457. "[n]either needed 459. 78 Just month, 523 argued supra. disagreed, ground "only 'transactions significantly members.' 7) 137). "Merrion easily reconcilable Montana-Strate line deem controlling." 7). middle nearly 218-223 (1959), recognizes occur guide implicate appropriate. 80 purports keeping above "as [its] crime." suffers flaws: treats officials. 81 Under enters dismisses footnote, "clearly" "private" "from removed." 82 assertion. resolved complete statute," inappropriate speak mean cases. 18. 83 services shared resources. Depending agreement, consent Some formally sanctioned creation tribal-state agreements. Mont. Code Ann. §18-11-101 seq. (State-Tribal Cooperative Agreements Act); Neb. §13-1502 Okla. Stat., Tit. 74, §1221 (Supp. 2001) (authorizing Governor behalf interest). addition, host authorities share manage services, enforcement. Cal. Health Safety §25198.1 (West 1992 Supp. (cooperative hazardous waste management); Pub. Res. §44201 1996) solid Minn. §626.90 peace officers); §277.058 1999) sites archeological significance); N. M. §9-11-12.1 2000) administration); Ore. §25.075 (1999) matters); Wash. §26.25.010 welfare); §79.60.010 timber forest management). 84 existed debatable, compare 36-38, 23-25, basis exist. understanding tribal, forecloses debate consent, ever Compare 18-19. 85 concentrates asking "regulatory 'necessary relations,' 86 outset, recites uncontroversial propositions. reservation"; 'is State' "; "States land"; 'process [a] reservation.' 8, 87 "these statements," "accord[s]" [an law] 10. informed Cotton Petroleum Corp. New Mexico, 490 163, 176-187 (concurrent severance oil gas production nonmembers); Rice Rehner, 463 713 (1983) Governments liquor licenses transactions reservations); 134 purchases nonmembers). Saying "accommodat[e]" nullified rule. 156. 88 undermining perplexing nod 6, oversight significant. implicated takes If coherence figured prominently 2-6. 89 extinguished competing governments. Corp., supra; greater, lesser, parties. gained access Hicks' actors, damaged property. 90 Certainly, undertaken infra, 14-15. finds "irrelevant" lawsuits 11. announces "cannot duties," "[a]ction control." 19. alleges warrants. liable explains these, allegations breach fall new immunity. 91 reflect whenever remain reverse 1032-1034 (Rymer, Montana), 944 1455, 1466 (Nev. (assuming, arguendo, jurisdiction). 92 impression conflict magnitude obstruct efforts secure Quite record cooperation 1-3; Supp., 1458-1459. 93 attempts officials) exceeding damaging concerns addressing precise 20-21. 94 suffices presented, i. contend applying basic 95 raised C1-C8. issues, stay 1468-1469, 26. correctly 1029-1031. view, misunderstood reviewed 96 developed doctrine comity. (1987); 845 Union, sued local school district, arm injury action. 847. challenging enjoined proceedings. injunction. 97 Appeals' "extent affairs non-Indians" 851-852. Likewise, retains compel owner submit 1331 lawful 852. foreclose foreclosed Farmers, 854-855. reasoned careful examination altered, divested, diminished, study Executive Branch embodied elsewhere, administrative decisions." 855-856. "examination itself," "sta[y] hand" 856-857. 99 insurance diversity pending 11-13. members' motion dismiss emphasized "[e]xhaustion comity, prerequisite." 16-17, remedies exhausted, "determination review," challenged 101 Later, "we reiterate[d] enunciate prudential comity." 473, 482-487 Application leads 102 doctrines immunity, Westfall Erwin, 484 292, 296-300 (1988), Harlow Fitzgerald, 457 800, 813-819 (1982), designed violate circuit meet standards costs trial discovery. 817-818. Employees Liability Reform Tort Compensation 1988, commonly allows substitute employee certifying 2679(d). contains provisions. §§41.032, 41.0335-41.0339 (1996 successfully invokes sovereign. When 635 allow interlocutory appeal adverse ruling ensure continue granted. Mitchell Forsyth, 472 511, 524-530 103 J5-J6, K8, K11-K13; Thus Appellate facing liability, entitled adjudicated earliest stage needless litigation. "magic" afford afforded 20. erred failing defenses. disposed 104 alters determinations guides believe Montana. adopt fails 106 joins, 107 disposition reasons stated relief 1983.1 Solicitor General's submission Curiae24-30. 108 exactly backwards. appears grants 13, ("[N]o actions"). initial deeply flawed. Absent Gulf Offshore Mobil Oil (1981) (State-court "governed law" added)).2 recognize dictates otherwise. 477-478 ("[S]tate assume disabling incompatibility adjudication").3 109 compelling parties, §1983. Section 1983 creates rights, Chapman Houston Organization, 441 600, 617 (1979); Constitution Despite mention questioned authorizes.4 110 obstacle whatsoever 485 ("Injunction terms result "). "Why, then, silence courts? [I]nadvertence [explanation] Now pregnant." 487. really treating objection 111 sum, endorsed General discusses irrespective type raised. ("When in] [v. (1981)], equally evident conduct"). ("Strate highways, 'express[ed] occurs road reservation' "state crime," fail needs discuss warrant," mystical 12, simple, common-sense notion body determines sorts hear. anyone listen higher "Strate [the] 'federal contrary' 7. 447-448. assuming exist, Yet presumably, hearing else do, supply rely. Of enlarge permitted today appear language. ("[T]ribal suits"), ("We enlargement jurisdiction]"). all, "enlarg[e]" nothing prevent uncontroversial. Note, Wake Monroe Pape, Harv. 1486, 1497, (1969) ("State puzzlingly hesitated such, section. supreme adopted expedient disavowing denying recovery merits").

Category: 1