Document: 427 U.S. 123 96 S.Ct. 2508 49 L.Ed.2d 361 UNITED STATES, Petitioner,v.Alice R. HOPKINS, etc. No. 75-246. June 24, 1976. [Syllabus intentionally omitted] PER CURIAM. 1 This case involves a suit by respondent's decedent,1 civilian employee of the Army and Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES), claiming wrongful discharge from his employment. He asserted jurisdiction under Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491, which provides for suits in Court Claims upon any express or implied contract with such military exchanges. The Government moved to dismiss lack jurisdiction. concluded that it had because decedent's relationship AAFES was based an employment is covered, since 1970, Act. 513 F.2d 1360, 206 Ct.Cl. 303. We granted certiorari resolve conflict between this decision contrary holding United States Appeals Fifth Circuit Young v. States, 498 1211 (1974). 423 821, 34, 46 38. 2 status claims against post exchanges has been some doubt Standard Oil Co. Johnson, 316 481, 62 1168, 86 L.Ed. 1611 (1942). There Court, striking down state tax on distribution motor fuel exchanges, held "are arms government deemed essential performance governmental functions. They are integral parts War Department . ." However, also observed "government assumes none financial obligations exchange." Id., at 485, S.Ct., 1170. 3 latter observation basis series decisions effect lacked over concerning activities nonappropriated fund instrumentalities.2 That court could not entertain services entity, because, assumed no liability entity's be said have consented designed vindicate obligations. Therefore, "claim States" existed Act source jurisdiction, Borden 116 F.Supp. 873, 126 902 (1953); Pulaski Cab 157 955, 141 160 (1958); Kyer 369 714, 177 747 (1966), cert. denied, 387 929, 87 2050, 18 990 (1967). 4 Claims, while denying recognized harsh consequences result leave claimants forum seek relief. "it up Congress remedy apparent (T)he courts should refrain legislating judicial fiat." Keetz 168 205, 207 (1964). 5 In 1970 amended provided: 6 "For purpose paragraph, shall considered States." Pub.L. 91-350, 84 Stat. 449. 7 amendment, as reports both Houses made clear, afford contractors federal sue instrumentalities doing away inequitable "loophole" S.Rep. 91-268, p. (1969); H.R.Rep. 91-933, (1970). Borden, supra; Pulaski, Keetz, And Kyer, supra, were cited examples "harsh result" amendment would correct. bill clearly provide "contractors" instrumentalities, E. g., pp. 4-5, there nothing legislative history indicate, contends, did include anyone who formed contractual relationship. Since statute applies, its terms, "any contract" we hold applicable contracts well those goods other services. fact dealt specifically exchange employees when wanted bring them within without provisions law dealing generally (E. 8171(b)) controlling weight here. deals rather than different classes employees. If general language, they removed congressional practices enacting kinds statutes. 8 alternatively contends do their employer, like orthodox serve "appointment" particular position. While ambiguity opinion apparently agreed plaintiff others him AAFES. think unnecessary unwise us decide question stage case, gave insufficient attention administrative regulations undertook e question. 9 created administered pursuant authority Secretary 10 §§ 3012 8012. nonappropriated-fund places position whereby Federal Government, absent special legislation, does assume manner entered into appropriated agencies assumed. U.S., however, alter Secretaries may engage "appointment," same personnel hired employed. See Crenshaw 134 99, 431, 33 825 (1890); Butler Pennsylvania, How. 402, 13 472 (1851). governing AAFES, ordinary instrumentality positions Appointment. AR 60-21/AFR 147-15, c. 1, I, P 1-7; 2, I (Nov. 12, 1974).3 recognition power employ appointment. House Senate Reports 91-350 explicitly activities, performing official duties, States. Supra, 2; 2. Further, certain rights afforded only appointed employees, and, more important, excluded coverage statutes granting 1-8. Of import exclusion, through operation 2105(c), Back Pay 5596. means subjected unjustified action given cause necessary that, specific command authorized regulation, unwarranted Keim 290, 293-296, 20 574, 575-576, 44 774 (1900); Sampson Murray, 415 61, 69-70, 94 937, 942-943, 39 166 (1974); Testan, 424 U. S. 392, 405-407, 948, 956-957, 47 114 (1976). appointees, exclusion seem indicate appointed, but allowed 11 say never person provided, separate process employed contract. 60-20/AFR 147-14, 4, II III (Mar. 21, 1974). Such subject procedures negotiation, approval, remedies 147-15. regulation defines "service including performed off installation "direct janitorial window cleaning service." App. A, A-6E. Under time plaintiff's discharge, provided "will enter (a service contract) active duty, civil Or employees." XIX, IIB (Apr. 14, 1965) (emphasis added). thus distinguished appointment contract, distinction prior hiring continues today use "contracting" "appointment." 12 When enacted making cognizable change way Code nor purport require all persons reaching conclusion virtue once determined he followed matter course. It event governed cases private sector economy typical employee-employer nature. relevance these analogy appointee erred threshold determination Rather, depends analysis previously described light whatever evidence adduced remand case. 14 whether susceptible time. issue one must receive additional consideration after development fuller record. 15 Respondent her brief advanced second theory sustained. She urged violation executive constituted claim enforceable due founded Constitution therefore Brief 51. At oral argument, counsel conceded our handed filing foreclosed claim. 16 Plaintiff's allegation breach sufficient, withstand Government's motion complaint grounds judgment so affirmed. portion deciding appointment, vacated remanded further proceedings 17 ordered. Mr. Justice POWELL dissents substantially reasons stated Judge Skelton dissenting Claims. 1366, 303, 314 (1975). named respondent widow original plaintiff. A "nonappropriated instrumentality" monies appropriation. 4779(c), 9779(c). Except where otherwise noted, presently effect. These differ respects discharge. On will determine

Category: 7