Document: 377 U.S. 288 84 S.Ct. 1302 12 L.Ed.2d 325 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR the ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, Petitioner,v.ALABAMA ex rel. Richmond M. FLOWERS, Attorney General. No. 169. Argued March 24, 1964. Decided June 1, Robert L. Carter, New York City, for petitioner. Gordon, Madison, Montgomery, Ala., respondent. Mr. Justice HARLAN, delivered opinion of Court. 1 This case, involving right petitioner, National Association Advancement Colored People, to carry on activities in Alabama, reaches this Court fourth time. In 956 General Alabama brought a suit equity oust association, 'membership' corporation, from State. The basis proceeding was Association's alleged failure comply with statutes requiring foreign corporations register Secretary State and perform other acts order qualify do business State;1 complaint also that certain petitioner's detailed below, were inimical well-being citizens 2 On day filed, obtained an parte restraining barring Association, pendente lite, conducting any within taking steps under state law. Before case heard merits, adjudged contempt failing court directing it produce various records, including membership lists. Supreme dismissed petition certiorari review final judgment procedural grounds, 265 Ala. 349, 91 So.2d 214, which Court, review, found inadequate bar consideration constitutional claims. N.A.A.C.P. v. Patterson, 357 449, 78 1163, 1488. Upholding those claims, we reversed without reaching question validity underlying order. 3 second round these proceedings remand 'for not inconsistent' Court's opinion, at 467, S.Ct., 1174, again affirmed had overturned. 268 531, 109 138. decision grounded belief rested 'mistaken premise.' Id., 532, So.2d, 139. Observing premise our prior been one 'plainly accepted' throughout here, ruled could not, first time remand, change its stance. 360 240, 243, 79 1001, 1003, 1004, 1205. We noted 'evidently acquainted here' when reaffirmed contempt, 243—244, remanded considering so doing, said: 'We assume * will fail proceed promptly disposition matters left open mandate further *.' rendered case. 245, 1004. 4 Our announced 8, 1959. Unable obtain hearing merits courts, 1960, commenced United States District there. Alleging courts afford depriving rights, sought enjoin enforcement Without passing action, because would executive judicial officers involved litigation protect 'the rights all citizens'. Gallion, D.C., 190 F.Supp. 583, 586. Appeals agreed matter 'should be litigated initially State.' 5 Cir., 290 F.2d 337, 343. It, however, vacated below instructions 'to permit issues presented determined expedition courts,' but retain jurisdiction take necessary o Ibid. invoked third October 23, 1961, entered as follows: 6 '* is vacated, direct trial action unless reasonable time, no later than January 2, 1962, shall have accorded petitioner opportunity motion dissolve 1956, upon such issued. Pending determination authorized over federal may appear appropriate assure prompt in, or connected with, action. *' 368 16—17, 82 4, 7 85. December more five years after 'temporarily' ousted Circuit Montgomery County, issued 1956. 29, 1961,2 decree continued 'in violation Constitution laws relating corporations' are usurpation abuse corporate functions detrimental Alabama. permanently enjoined affiliated doing 'any description kind' attempting appealed which, February 28, 1963, merits. 274 544, 150 677. relied wholly fully below. granted certiorari, 375 810, 52, 11 47. I. 8 consider nonfederal asserted by 9 Assignment Errors specified 23 claimed errors court.3 Each claim error separately numbered set off separate paragraph. Most claims deprived protected Federal Constitution. brief filed divided into four sections: 'Statement Case,' Facts,' 'Propositions Law' (containing 15 paragraphed propositions law, list cases supporting each), 'Argument.'4 'Argument' section subdivided parts Roman numerals unaccompanied headings. There specific reference each assignment relied.5 Only mentioned once; twice, both times connection same substantive issue. only two paragraphs there assigned error, paragraph discussion related assignments another assignments. 10 reproduced Appendix B Court; accuracy reproduction questioned based entirely conform rules court. Although referred Rule Rules, concerns form appellant's brief,6 gave indication respect fell short requirements Rule, appears placed reliance all. See 546, 679. rather 'a rule long standing frequent application where unrelated argued together merit, others considered.' Proceeding apply brief, held least contained subdivisions therefore merit assignments.7 argues non-federal ground adequate serious presents. find position unacceptable. Paying full court's seems us crystal clear cannot reasonably deemed applicable separately, argument pertaining thereto. A devoted except, above, included 13 These six assignments, like others, explicitly tied each. loss understand how concluded structure did meet requirement 'argued together.' Had simply omitted subdivide section, intended presumably organizational aid understanding, conceivable suggestion bulk'; and, indeed, sole conclusion grouped numbering subdivisions.8 mere stylistic device, well regarded detracting brief's conformity question. thwarted simple recitation has observance compl ance substance form, every real sense. Davis Wechsler, 263 22, 44 13, 14, 68 L.Ed. 143; Staub City Baxley, 355 313, 318—320, 277, 280—281, 302. To effect, see similar aspect U.S., 454—458, 1167—1170. 14 heretofore applied their respecting preparation briefs pointless severity shown here. early Bell Fulgham, 202 217, 218, 80 So. 39, 40, 'The appellant characterized degree informality apparent lack attention (predecessor present 9); directory, adoption exercised discretion fairly helpfully make points relies. Agreeably practice thus established, 16 More recently, Bolton Barnett Lumber & Supply Co., 267 74, 75, 100 9, stated governing 'directory' said 'if even though compliance rule, makes relies, may, discretion, it.' saw 'no reason why should difficulty complying rules.' 17 Other accord. Brothers Brothers, 208 258, 259, 94 175, 177, 18 'It true does refer tenth eleventh number, strictness done. But, view simplicity record, facts rulings discussed, understanding argument, preferred condone fault instance.' 19 Madison Limestone Co. McDonald, 264 295, 301, 87 539, treated sufficient three 'not properly expressed.' Mott, 266 422, 96 766, 25 none number brief. 'strictly conform' contents' appellants' briefs, feel defects warrant dismissal appeal.' 424, So.2d., 767. stated: condoned noncompliance record strict essential brief.' Kendall Fort Payne, 262 465, 466, 801, 802, effect. 20 Farabee, 437, 439, 108 148, 149 150, 21 'As pointed out appellee, complied standards required *. concise statement much presents exception referring pages transcript heading, Case'. general law sustain seven appeal. And cited seemed argue several together. Nevertheles , exercise give argued. (Italics added.) 22 too unimportant prevent very relies accompanied failures rules. Shelby County Baker, 269 111, 116, 110 896, 900, 'Appellant thirty grounds them groups, available kindred nature group examined. However, many seem somewhat kindred, deference counsel, them.' (Citations omitted.) 24 Brooks Everett, 271 380, 124 100, considered although 38 'specifically brief'. 381, 102. (W)e if merits.' Stariha Hagood, 252 158, 162, 40 85, 89; Quinn Hannon, 630, 632—633, 239, 241; Thompson State, 25, 99 198, 200. quite evidently support State's position. some, Dobson Deason, 258 219, 61 764, supra; Pak-A-Sak Inc. Lauten, 276, 279, 123 122, 125. cases, different allegations joined single error. Mobile, Jackson Kansas R. Bromberg, 141 273, 37 395, 398; Chemical Hall, 212 10, 101 456, 458; Snellings Jones, 33 Ala.App. 303, 371. remaining ones them, together, bulk,' insufficient, must fall. Ford Bradford, 218 62, 65, 117 429, 431; Taylor Taylor, 251 374, 383, 645, 652 653; First Bank Birmingham Lowery, 36, 41, 81 284, 287; 200; Bertolla Kaiser, 435, 440, 103 736, 740; McElhaney Singleton, 270 167, 375, 380; Mize Mize, 273 369, 370, 200, 201. While always opinions argued, that, unlike situation they purpose argument,' Birmingham, supra, 287, fact group, words used suggest. McElhaney, 166, example, quoted 'Proposition refers covered Assignments remainder quoted, ibid., never distinguished. 652, 51 'grouped None approaches ruling when, individually relevant each, bulk' because, forsooth, whole di ided subdivisions. 26 sum, think what point fits situation: 27 'Novelty permitted thwart who, justified decisions, seek vindication rights.' 457—458, 1169. 28 urged inadequate, be, might enough circumstances, gone before, reject contention II. 29 against finally amended, corporation maintaining office charged were: 30 (1) 'employed otherwise paid money' Autherine Lucy Polly Meyers Hudson encourage enroll students University test legality policy admitting Negroes; 31 (2) furnished legal counsel represent admission University; 32 (3) 'engaged organizing, financing illegal boycott' compel bus line segregate passengers according race; (4) 'falsely charged' officials law; 34 (5) 'arbitrary, vindictive, collusive' contesting ouster 'before impartial forum,' deliberately denying ouster; (6) filing it, knowing charges therein false; 35 (7) 'willfully violated' carrying State; 36 (8) attempted 'pressure' mayor Philadelphia, Governor Pennsylvania, Penn football team boycott team' teams play Liberty Bowl; (9) 'encouraged, aided, abetted unlawful breach peace cities gaining national notoriety enable raise funds false protection rights'; (10) course conduct seeking deny voluntarily segregate'; 39 (11) carried All 'causing irreparable injury property civil residents criminal prosecution actions relief conduct, procedure, allegations, methods Respondent render totally unacceptable people transacts 41 last allegation, failed statutory furnishes ouster. Code 1940, Tit. §§ 192—194. provisions require before file articles incorporation written instrument designating place agent residing fee $10. notice amendments changes agent.9 42 nothing sections attaches consequence permanent fails register.10 That effect statute conclusively demonstrated § 194, provides complete remedy: (A)ny (foreign) engages preceding shall, offense, forfeit pay sum thousand dollars.' 43 confirm registration face be: ensuring amenable courts.11 'They constitute police regulation interests act business, function, prohibited. Sonstitution fraud imposition insolvent unreliable corporations, attitude reached process favor having cause complaint.' Western Talley-Bates Const. 162 396, 402—403, 50 341, 342. Armour Packing La., Ltd., Vinegar Bend 205, 866; George Muller Mfg. Dothan, 176 229, 57 762. able none, statute.12 excluding furnish better foundation manifestly untenable. commenced, upheld Anne Adams, 350 76 33, 3. Neither furnishing financial assistance, scholarship, attend University, nor providing assist efforts gain could, consistently decisions inhibited contrary University's Negroes. Button, 371 415, 83 328, 405. 45 charge listed above scarcely substantial. Even indulge doubtful assumption organized refusal ride Montgomery's buses protest racial segregation might, more, some circumstances violate valid ould constitutionally denial associate advocacy ideas lawful means. As stage litigation: 46 beyond debate freedom engage association advancement beliefs inseparable 'liberty' assured Due Process Clause Fourteenth Amendment, embraces speech.' 460, 1171. 47 repeatedly governmental control subject achieved means sweep unnecessarily broadly thereby invade area freedoms. id., 463—464, 1172—1173. (T)he power regulate attaining permissible end, unduly infringe freedom.' Cantwell Connecticut, 310 296, 304, 60 903. (E)ven legitimate substantial, pursued stifle fundamental personal liberties end can narrowly achieved.' Shelton Tucker, 364 479, 488, 247, 252, 231; (footnote omitted). For elaborating principle, Lovell Griffin, 303 444, 451, 58 666, 668, 949; Schneider Jersey, Town Irvington, 308 147, 161, 165, 146, 152, 155; Martin Struthers, Ohio, 319 141, 146—149, 63 862, 864—866, 1313; Saia York, 334 558, 1148, 92 1574; American Communications Assn. C.I.O. Douds, 339 382, 70 674, 925; Kunz 340 290, 294—295, 71 312, 315—316, 95 280; Louisiana Gremillion N.A.A.C.P., 366 293, 1333, 301. principle here accomplished solely act; 'whether legislative judicial, still asked scrutinize.' 463, 1172. 48 compelled disclosure names members entail likelihood substantial restraint association.' 462, It obvious suppression abridgment right. suggest objective requires restraint. Compare 315—316. 49 fourth, fifth, sixth involve 'false charges' made representatives officials.13 speculating possible infirmities subject, cf. Times Sullivan, 376 254, 710, 686, conclude reasons discussed restriction So seventh charge, alleges 'temporary' 1956 1961 (when permanent). dispose sufficiency evidence finding questions raised restrained unquestionable pass eighth comment; stre ch germane controversy. ninth breaches peace, falls third. 'There public remedies community Kunz, 294, 315, rights. adds anything challenges express views, vital concern. Such challenge stand. occasion survives impose conditions chooses exclude altogether. E.g., Crescent Cotton Oil Mississippi, 257 129, 137, 42, 44, 66 166. truth, involves privilege individuals collective ideas. 'Freedoms (this) heavy-handed frontal attack, being stifled subtle interference.' Bates Little Rock, 361 516, 523, 412, 416, 480. Nor People Bryant Zimmerman, 278 63, 61, 62 A.L.R. 785, York's regulatory Ku Klux Klan, earlier 'involved markedly considerations terms interest *,' 1173. noted, inter alia, 'based particular character Klan's activities, intimidation violence, assumed legislature enacted statute, itself took notice.' reversed. history formulate entry delay. undoubtedly lies power, Hunter's Lessee, Wheat. 97, prefer follow usual inconsistent opinion. include decree, accordance procedures, vacating respects injunction permitting Should unhappily mistaken implement disposition, leave given relief. 52 Reversed remanded. note infra, p. 304. days date yet hearing. supra. part typewritten 'Conclusion,' requests reversal One all, waived 549, 682. provides: 'Appellant's headings contain: (a) heading transcript; (b) condensed recital narrative clearly concisely, transcript, insufficiency verdict finding, assigned, then contain witness bearing issue testimony concisely; (c) Law,' statement, proposition authorities citing parties given, book page reported; (d) desire insist upon. substantially statements Case' Facts' taken accurate decision, opposite party his corrections additions.' 261 XXII. fifth subdivision issustrative whole, 'V discloses singular showing since 1918. manner instituted, appellant, misuse purely aims objectives variance views officials. Amendment Error Number 10. Proposition ante, racia discrimination kind imposed enforced whether schools, Brown Board Education, recreational facilities, Dawson Mayor, parks, Holmes Atlanta, intrastate commerce, Gayle Browder, interstate Bailey kinds facilities. struck down regulations discrimination. Yick Wo Hopkins, 118 356; Oyama California, 332 633; Takahashi Fish Game Commission, 410. restrictions persons advocating elimination segregation, What who work concert opposition seeks perpetuate unconstitutional pattern discrimination, submitted 16. short, using accomplish forbidden herein, constitutes States. Cf. Gomillion Lightfoot, 'Under rehearing deprivation due guaranteed Amendment.' dealt arguments 'Assignments Subsection V erred rehearing. settled appeal; appeal decree. 'Since Nos. considered. 645.' 548—549, 681—682. illustrative 'Argument.' subdivisions, dealing error.' sentence portion 7, 296. 'Every engaging transacting state, secretary certified copy writing, seal signed officially president thereof, known agents thereat; amend abandon designated instrument, substitute new writing herein provided, state. 'Such engaged insurance superintendent insurance, officer whom ten dollars use transact provided sections; forward, changes, (1958 Recomp.), 21(90)—21(92). Since requirements, 1940 violating Art. 12, 232, Constitution, 'No therein, association. sued county service anywhere provide payment franchise tax actual amount capital employed Strictly benevolent, educational, religious tax.' Compare, e.g., Mass.Gen.Laws Ann., c. 181, 19; Vermont Statutes 11, 861. powers equity, proved evidence, along register, warranted (The reserved 'at future findings citations authorities.' far presently davised, filed.) Nothing suggests otherwise, past preventing registering pp. 309 310. foregoing merely unnecessary contentions nonprofit organization, exempt requirement, knowingly 1918, barred laches invoking concerned (and withdrawn) Lucy, vacate suspending her attendance classes. Civ. decided Northern 1957. concern added complaint, amendment 1961.

Category: 2