Document: 510 U.S. 1 DAYv.DAY No. 92-8788. Supreme Court of United States. Decided October 12, 1993.* Since this Court's Rule 39.8 was first invoked in June 1993 to deny pro se petitioner Day forma pauperis status, he has filed eight more petitions for certiorari, all them demonstrably frivolous. Held: is denied leave proceed the instant cases, and Clerk directed not accept any further certiorari from him noncriminal matters unless pays required docketing fee submits his petition compliance with 33. This order will free limited resources consider claims those petitioners who, unlike Day, have abused process. Motions denied. ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS PER CURIAM. Pro Roy A. requests under 39 Court. We request pursuant 39.8. allowed until November 2, 1993, within which pay fees by 38 submit also direct 2 an abuser status last June. See In re 509 U. S. 902 (1993). At that time had 27 past nine years. Although granted file these petitions, were without recorded dissent. we June, Court—all 3 As recognized, "[e]very paper Court, no matter how repetitious or frivolous, requires some portion institution's resources. A part responsibility see are allocated a way promotes interests justice." McDonald, 489 180, 184 (1989) (per curiam). Consideration Day's frivolous does promote end. 4 entered orders similar present one on previous occasions prevent filing Martin v. District Columbia Appeals, 506 (1992) curiam), extraordinary relief. Sindram, 498 177 (1991) curiam); supra. 5 refusal heed our earlier warning us take step. His abuse writ been so limit sanction accordingly. The therefore petitioning challenge criminal sanctions might be imposed him. But it who 6 It ordered. Notes: * Together 92-8792,Day Bekiempis, 92-8888, Heinrich et al., 92-8905, GAF Building Materials Corp., 92-8906, Clinton 92-9018, Black 92-9101, Deason 93-5430, motions pauperis. JUSTICE STEVENS, dissenting. Adhering views expressed dissenting opinions Brown Herald Co., 464 928, 931 (1983), 185 (1989), Wrenn Benson, 490 89, 92 I would writs reaching merits future, however, shall encumber record noting my dissent denying pauperis, absent exceptional circumstances.

Category: 1