Document: 381 U.S. 336 85 S.Ct. 1486 14 L.Ed.2d 422 Paul V. CASE, Petitioner,v.STATE OF NEBRASKA. No. 843. Argued April 28, 1965. Decided May 24, Daniel J. Meador, Charlottesville, Va., for petitioner. Melvin Kent Kammerlohr, Lincoln, Neb., the State of Neb. PER CURIAM. 1 Petitioner sought a writ habeas corpus in District Court Lancaster County, Nebraska, alleging that he was unconstitutionally denied assistance counsel when entered plea guilty court to charge burglary. The trial dismissed petition without hearing, and filed no opinion. Nebraska Supreme affirmed. 177 404, 129 N.W.2d 107. Court's opinion recognized petitioner's allegations, if true, would establish violation Federal Constitution. at 410, N.W.2d, 111. held, however, that, 'Habeas is not available discharge prisoner from sentence penal servitude imposing it had jurisdiction offense person charged with crime, within power court.' 412, 112. We granted certiorari, 379 958, 672, 13 554, decide whether Fourteenth Amendment requires States afford state prisoners some adequate corrective process hearing determination claims federal constitutional guarantees. 2 After certiorari granted, Legislature enacted statute providing postconviction procedure. Neb.Leg. Bill 836, Seventy-fifth Session, effective 12, On its face, provides petitions such as this one, denial rights. Therefore, judgment vacated cause remanded reconsideration light supervening statute. 3 It so ordered. 4 Judgment remanded. 5 Mr. Justice CLARK, concurring. 6 As points out, we case 'to guarantees.' Happily, interim has adopted just procedure thus obviating necessity our passing upon question. 7 should be pointed early 1949 Young v. Ragen, 337 235, 69 1073, 93 L.Ed. 1333, articulated principle must 'clearly defined method by which they may raise rights.' Id., 239, S.Ct., 1074, 1333. But compare Mooney Holohan, 294 103, 55 340, 79 791 (1935). In stating proposition noted: 'The doctrine exhaustion remedies, required scrupulous adherence all courts * presupposes remedy exists. recognize difficulties Illinois faced adapting procedures (this) requirement *. Nevertheless, met.' supra, 238—239, 1074—1075. 8 Thereafter, Post-Conviction Hearing Act adopted.1 followed passage North Carolina 1951 'modeled' on Act.2 Miller State, 237 N.C. 29, 51, 74 S.E.2d 513, 528 (1953). seventh adopt since supra.3 There exists wide variety procedural techniques have been used deal due attacks criminal convictions, i.e., basic common-law remedies corpus, coram nobis delayed motions new trial. great variations scope availability result their being entirely inadequate. 9 consequence there tremendous increase applications courts. Indeed, alone increased threefold last 15 years. This brought about much public agitation debate over proposed limitations proposals based various grounds, including federal-state comity; inordinate delay administration justice courts; heavy burden judiciary. None these will survive careful scrutiny. 10 Strangely enough little thrown more State. 1958 Burton Committee4 reported out preliminary draft findings stated 11 'that law post-conviction many states wholly inadequate cope demands now placed it. jurisdictions were altogether precluded direct access (Cochran Kansas, 316 255, 62 1068, 86 1453 (1942); Dowd United ex rel. Cook, 340 206, 71 262, 95 215 (1951).) more, failed provide genuine opportunities testing issues most numerous important types. often obtain hearings allegations This, turn, number generally productive frustrations persons concerned process.'5 12 Believing practical answer problem enactment several statutes I applaud action Nebraska. enable 'air out' stop rising conflict presently generated between proven true where dropped considerably after adopted. understand considering enlargement five-year period present 20-year period. consensus solve Illinois, originally 'sore spot' Nation regard. hope follow lead Maryland, Carolina, Maine, Oregon Wyoming modern relieve ever-increasing burden. BRENNAN, petitioner his 18, 1963, one month decision Gideon Wainwright, 372 335, 83 792, 799, holding Sixth guarantee applicable prosecutions virtue Amendment.1 prior decisions convicted prisoner, judicial inquiry limited convicting accused, question imposed court.2 conceded response unavailable hear claim other courts.3 16 oral argument, appointed petitioner, see 995, 722, relevancy procedure,4 but contended nevertheless entitled declaration courts, reversal mandate directing adequately adjudicated.5 17 concedes practice remit remedy. See, e.g., Jennings 342 104, 72 123, 96 119. contends substituting process, instead itself meet obligation, disservice sound principles federalism.6 He vast evidence lack put an intolerable strain mounting friction See Henry Mississippi, 443, 453, 564, 570. short, evolution coverage Fay Noia 391, 822, 837, pull judiciary increasingly into administration, broader hospitable claims. 18 desirability minimizing resort denied. Our system entrusts primary responsibility laws. Supremacy Clause make requirements fair integral part those laws, ideally include guarantees well.7 If, processes assumed burden, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1958 ed.) clearly promote primacy implementation Of greater importance, assure only meritorious vindicated any need intervention, nonmeritorious fully ventilated, making easier task judge pursued further. Townsend Sain, 293, 312—318, 745, 770. Greater finality inevitably attach determinations questions, because further evidentiary would, conditions Sain met, prove unnecessary. 19 can view satisfaction channeling large business If procedures, too scarce,8 adopted, done remove irritant participation district 1954 Report Special Committee Habeas Corpus Conference Chief Justices way urging 'State least broad existing under right asserted are determined statutes,' recommending provisions record, fact conclusions law. H.R.Rep.No.1293, 85th Cong., 2d Sess., p. et seq. 20 These similar suggestions desirable attributes reduce exercise jurisdiction.9 swift simple easily invoked. sufficiently comprehensive embrace Noia, eschew rigid technical doctrines forfeiture, waiver, or default. Douglas Alabama, 380 415, 422—423, 1074; supra. full resolve disputed factual issues, compilation record determine sufficiency hearings. supported opinions, law, disclose grounds resolution facts. Provision represent prisoners, Act, enhance probability presentation proper disposition prisoners' 21 occasion process. face plainly Every consideration federalism supports conclusion opportunity say claim. Ill.Rev.Stat., c. 38, §§ 122—1—122—7 (1963). N.C.Gen.Stat. 15—217—15—222 (Supp. 1963). passed legislation. Md.Ann. Code, Art. 27, 645A 645J 1964); Me.Rev.Stat.Ann., 126, 1—A 1—G (Supp.1963); Ore.Rev.Stat. 138.510—138.680 (1963); Wyo.Stat.Ann. 7—408.1 7—408.8 (1963 Cum.Supp.). noted, six rule court. Alaska Sup.Ct. Rule 35(b); Del.Super.Ct.Crim.Proc. 35, Del.C.Ann.; Fla. Rules Crim.Proc. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix; Ky.Rules 11.42; Mo.Sup.Ct. 27.26, V.A.M.R.; N.J.Crim.Prac. Super. County Cts., 3:10A—2. late revered memory Chairman Post Conviction Remedies American Bar Association's Section Judicial Administration. August circulated study Effective Procedures—Their Nature Essentialities, prepared Seminar Criminal Procedure University Chicago Law School direction Professor Francis A. Allen. 2—3. reads: 'Petitioner, Vernon sentenced five (5) years Penal Correctional Complex 3, A.D. 'Petitioner 'fast talked' forcibly coerced waiving rights (U.S. Constitutional Rights) advice counsel; Preliminary Hearing, plead not-guilty. 'Mr. William D. Blue told he, Petitioner, 'An Habitual Criminal' did waive He, held Solitary Confinement City Jail, until time agree—under cruel unusual circumstances. waived guaranteed him Constitution fundamental essential made obligatory States, All states, Amendment. For reference Wainwright Court. October 1962, Term, 155; concurring.' Jackson Olson, 146 885, 893—894, 22 124, 129—130, 165 A.L.R. 932; re Dunn, 150 669, 35 673; Hawk 145 306, 181, rev'd 326 271, 66 116, 90 61, remand, 875, 136. stated: 'For purposes, collateral who alleges occurred connection conviction whose yet considered unless prisoner's predicated sentencing accused.' addition concession provided whatever, cites Carlsen 84, 261 N.W. 339, authority unavailability nobis; Neb.Rev.Stat. 29—2103 (1964 Reissue), barring motion trial; 25—1912 appeal. statute, 75th 1965, provides: 'Sec. 1. A custody claiming released ground infringement render void voidable file verified sentence, relied upon, asking vacate set aside sentence. 'Unless files records show relief, shall notice thereof served county attorney, grant prompt thereon, respect thereto. finds resentence appear appropriate. Proceedings act civil nature. Costs taxed cases. 'A entertain requiring production held. Testimony witnesses offered deposition. second successive relief behalf same prisoner. 2. An order sustaining overruling deemed final judgment, appeal taken therefrom appeals cases; Provided, discretion application recognizance fix pending 3. cumulative intended concurrent state. Any proceeding facts constitute another prejudice. 4. appoint attorney attorneys, exceeding two, proceedings compensation section 29—1803, Reissue Revised Statutes 1943.' brief: 'At stage litigation pass steps fail comply might suggested, essentially different actual potential disobedience cases remand available, could return here fresh certiorari. then custody. That ultimate sanction behind 209—210, 263—264, 215.' support contention, argues constitutionally require defects prosecutions, citing Frank Mangum, 309, 582, 590, 59 969; Moore Dempsey, 86, 91, 43 265, 266, 67 543; 113, 342, 791; New York Whitman Wilson, 318 688, 690, 63 840, 841, 87 1083; Carter 329 173, 175—176, 216, 218, 219, 91 172; Foster 332 134, 139, 1716, 1719, 1955; Taylor 335 252, 272, 68 1415, 1424, 92 1935 (concurring opinion); cited involving general General Oil Co. Crain, 209 211, 228, 475, 481, 52 754; Kenney Lodge, 252 411, 40 371, 372, 64 638; Ward Board Com'rs Love 253 17, 419, 751; McKnett St. Louis & S.F.R. Co., 292 230, 54 78 1227; Testa Katt, 330 386, 810, 967. also allowed attack convictions jurisdictional unconstitutionaly discriminated against refusing discriminate arising unconstitutional defect relies Johnson Zerbst, 304 458, 58 1019, 82 1461. refers where, vacating said: 'If post-trial wish advised case.' U.S., 1075. Denno, 378 368, 84 1774, 908; Boles Stevenson, 43, 174, 109; 408; Note, Effect Requiring Remedies, 53 Col.L.Rev. 1143 Dean Griswold Harvard School, address, Law,' given 13, Cleveland Association, 'For, all, enforcement remains States. are, be, high standards government. should, my view, welcome prescribed seriously enforced. What needed accept responsibility, means carry out. With explanation understanding, can, believe, impairing When do better off, nearly realized potentialities Great form Government.' Uniform 9B Laws Ann. 352—359, designed adjudication claims, slight influence Arkansas 1957, repealed two later. Acts (1959) 1160—1161. Six own statutes. Ill.Rev.Stats., 122—1 122 Md.Ann.Code, (Supp.1964); 15—217 15—222 1963); Procedures 35(a); Fla.Rules 1; 27.26; 3:10A Some apparently broadening construction. People Huntley, N.Y.2d 72, 255 N.Y.S.2d 838, 204 N.E.2d 179 (1965); Banach v Boles, 141 W.Va. 850, 858, 131 728 Hunt Warden, F.2d 936, 941—942 (C.A.4th Cir.) (discussing expanding Maryland remedy). views expressed App.Div.2d 424, 430, 239 900, 903; Ex parte Aaron, 275 Ala. 377, 381—382, 155 So.2d 334, 337—338 (dissenting Donnell Nash, 323 850 (C.A.8th Cir.); Cobb Balkcom, 339 95, 100 (C.A.5th Cir.). Proposals co-extensive found Meador. Accommodating Postconviction Review, 50 A.B.A.J. 928 (1964); National Assn. Attys. Gen. Proceedings, 1964, pp. 42—43 (remarks Arthur Sills, Atty. Jersey), 149—150 (resolution Association); Brennan, Aspects Federalism, 39 N.Y.U.L.Rev. 945, 957—959 (1964). A.B.A.J., 929—930, N.Y.U.L.Rev., 958—959; cf. 23, ABA (Mid-Winter Meeting, Feb. 1965) 5, 7.

Category: 8