Document: 394 U.S. 244 89 S.Ct. 1030 22 L.Ed.2d 248 Samuel DESIST et al., Petitioners,v.UNITED STATES. No. 12. Argued Nov. 12, 1968. Decided March 24, 1969. Rehearing Denied May 26, See 395 931, 1766. Abraham Glasser, New York City, for petitioners. Francis X. Beytagh, Jr., Cleveland, Ohio, respondent. Mr. Justice STEWART delivered the opinion of Court. 1 The petitioners were convicted by a jury in District Court Southern conspiring to import and conceal heroin violation federal narcotics laws.1 An important part Government's evidence consisted tape recordings conversations among several City hotel room. tapes made officers adjoining room means an electronic recording device which did not physically intrude into petitioners' room.2 Because there was no 'trespass' or 'actual intrusion constitutionally protected area,' Appeals rejected argument that this inadmissible because eavesdropping had violated their rights under Fourth Amendment. convictions affir ed,3 we granted certiorari consider constitutional questions thus presented.4 2 Last Term Katz v. United States, 389 347, 88 507, 19 576, held reach Amendment 'cannot turn upon presence absence physical any given enclosure.' Id., at 353, S.Ct., 512. Noting 'Fourth protects people, places,' id., 351, 511, overruled cases holding search seizure speech requires some trespass actual penetration particular enclosure. We concluded since every private is seizure, it can comply with standards only when authorized neutral magistrate showing probable cause precise limitations appropriate safeguards. case carried out pursuant such warrant, must therefore be reversed if applied surveillance conducted before date decision. have concluded, however, extent departed from previous holdings Court, should wholly prospective application. Accordingly, find merit other challenges convictions, affirm judgment us.5 3 are met outset contention does actually present choice between retroactive application new doctrine. decision, said, depart existing interpretation Constitution, but merely confirmed demise obsolete decisions enunciating distinction 'trespassory' searches those premises. Goldman 316 129, 62 993, 86 L.Ed. 1322; Olmstead 277 438, 48 564, 72 944.6 But misconstrues our Katz. Our 'can longer regarded as controlling,' U.S., 512, recognized been until day.7 True, principles they expressed modified. belief oral conversation could object 'search' 'seizure' survived.8 And Silverman 365 505, 81 679, 5 734, cautioned scope ascertained resort 'ancient niceties tort real property law.' 682. assumption persisted offend Constitution unless area.'9 While may reflected growing dissatisfaction traditional tests validity surveillance,10 consistently reiterated declined invitations abandon them.11 However clearly foreshadowed, clear break past, compelled decide whether its limited future. 4 Ever Linkletter Walker, 381 618, 629, 85 1731, 1737, 14 601 established 'the neither prohibits nor retrospective effect' expounding rules affecting criminal trials, has viewed retroactivity nonretroactivity function three considerations. As most recently summarized them Stovall Denno, 388 293, 297, 87 1967, 1970, 18 1199, 'The criteria guiding resolution question implicate (a) purpose served standards, (b) reliance law enforcement authorities on old (c) effect administration justice standards.'12 6 Foremost these factors rule.13 This criterion strongly supports prospectivity decision amplifying evidentiary exclusionary rule. Thus, principally Court's assessment Mapp 367 643, 1684, 1081, led deny finally benefit Mapp's extension rule States: 7 'all * requiring exlcusion illegal based necessity effective deterrent police action. cannot say would advanced making retrospective. misconduct already occurred will corrected releasing prisoners involved.' 636, 637, 1741.14 8 further observed that, contrast accorded effect,15 'there likelihood unreliability coercion search-and-seizure case'; 'procedural weapon bearing guilt,' fairness trial attack.' 638, 639, 1742. Following reasoning Linkletter, Fuller Alaska, 393 80, 61, 21 212, Lee Florida, 392 378, 2096, 20 1166, Analogizing Mapp, seized § 605 Federal Communications Act16 'no less relevant reliable than Amendment,' both 'designed enforce 81, 62. 9 second third factors—reliance officials, burden flow application—also militate favor applying prospectively. first time explicitly 'physical penetration' enunciated earlier periodic restatements courts alike placed controlling precedents fully justified continuing validity. Nor theretofore prohibitions encompassed 'non-trespassory' surveillance. On contrary, few months case, Second Circuit upheld introduction obtained same agent virtually identical installation. States Pardo-Bolland, 348 F.2d 316, cert. denied, 382 944, 388, 15 353. 10 Although apparently many gathered warrantless surveillance,17 doubt number state pre-Katz substantial.18 Moreover, determination instance tainted difficult time-consuming task, which, particularly attempted long after event, impose weighty court. Cf. Alderman 180—185, 970 973. It noted also relied heavily consequent either prospectivity.19 overwhelmingly nonretroactivity, result even relatively set aside 11 argue effect, least govern like petitioners', pending direct review decided. Petitioners point involving applicable still A similar approach adopted Tehan ex rel. Shott, 406, 459, 453, respect Griffin California, 380 609, 1229, 106. In Johnson Jersey, 384 719, 1772, 16 882, abandoned taken jurisprudential obstacles' adoption different cut-off point. 733, 1781. explained 12 '(o)ur necessarily become final rendered. Decisions prior without discussion appeal announced.' 732, 1780.20 13 Here, hand, Johnson, possibility (Katz) prospectively yet open issue.' Ibid. All reasons undercut review. Both focus search, subsequent prosecution, date. Exclusion increase justice, overturn fair decisions, serve deter seizures sensibly maintained foreclosed simply Katz, decision.21 intimated points depended degree provision involved. There is, moreover, significant decisions. dealt solely applicability States; situation (was that) knew forbidden engaging unreasonable Wolf Colorado, 338 25, 69 1359, 93 1782 (1949).'22 Before thought fall within Amendment.23 Therefore, lacks whatever impetus knowingly unconstitutional conduct provided apply all prosecutions. sum, hold prosecution seeks introduce fruits December 18, 1967.24 Since consistent affirmed. 17 Affirmed. BLACK, while adhering his dissent 640, 1743, (1965), concurs affirmance stated dissenting 364, 518, 576 (1967). MARSHALL took consideration case. DOUGLAS, dissenting. mystery me why petitioner Desist copetitioners. That seem hand. I understand today's ruling announced cases. do that; recent announcing variations notorious example Miranda Arizona, 436, 1602, 694, where, recall, 80 presented raising question. four rest then disposed each four, procedural retroactively. respects denied relief. 882. Yet sheer coincidence chosen. Any single group sufficient purposes. this, more, Black 601, concurred. again clarity vigor HARLAN dissent, Part join. remains how people trials others kept jail hope relief though complaints equally meritorious. At 'wholly application,' 23 pretense bound retroactively defendant all, too transparent need answer. B. J. Moore, Practice 191 (2d ed. 1965); K. Davis, Administrative Law Treatise 5.09 (1958); Levy, Realist Jurisprudence Prospective Overruling, 109 U.Pa.L.Rev. 1, 15; Currier, Time Change Judge-Made Law: 51 Va.L.Rev. 201, 216—234 (1965). 24 1781, where commenced announced, said: 25 obstacles adopting here. judicial manner. England Louisiana State Board Medical Examiners, 375 411, 84 461, 440 (1964); James 366 213, 1052, 246 (1961).' 26 Where spirit strong, heretofore impediment producing dictum through 'case controversy.' Indeed tradition started Marbury Madison, Cranch 137, 60. 27 HARLAN, 28 short years embraced notion applied, (1965),1 created extraordinary collection principle. certain 'new' subject review, supra; 453 (1966); commenced, 882 introduced trial, 212 (1968); party involved future proscribed official occurred. 1199 (1967); De Stefano Woods, 631, 2093, 1308 (1968). 29 more once said very integrity fact-finding process,' supra, 1743; see 416, 465; 62, requirement eroded 728—729, 1778—1779, 299, 1971, supra. Again, although 'clearly foreshadowed' law, Supra, 731, 1779; Berger 314, 540, 508 (1969), today rejects contention. Ante, 248. Indeed, now departs preexisting doctrine refusing system ultimately laid down (1967), despite concession 'relatively few' reconsidered. Compare ante, 251-252, 1742; 418—419, 466—467; 731—732, 1779 1780; 300, 1971. 30 past joined opinions have, so time, generated incompatible inconsistent principles. limit impact seemed profoundly unsound longer, remain content doctrinal confusion characterized efforts basic 'Retroactivity' rethought. I. 31 RETROACTIVITY ON DIRECT REVIEW. 32 Upon reflection, accept two ago reaffirmed today, permits entirely prospectively, exception litigant whose chosen vehicle establishing right insisting must, minimum, handed down. 33 Matters principle stake. classical view adjudication, share, defendants come request largesse. entitled issues facts require just adjudication merits. 60 (1803). release so, think wise government offended another similarly situated comes us, grant give principled reason acting differently. pick choose who alone receive law. 34 character perhaps best exposed considering following hypothetical. Imagine anticipated line subsequently pursued 352—353, 511—512, concluding—as did—that underpinnings controlling.' Would ground th announced—though Katz—should control retroactive? To venture satisfaction lower court reached conclusion If truly right, reverse accepted it; arguments embraced. Anything else belie truism task other, merits own terms fundamental premise properly considered legitimate products rather commands super-legislature. 35 Re-examination developments field leads irresistibly solid disposition lies vacating remanding light II. 36 HABEAS CORPUS. 37 What my standpoint, enough dispose us. Ordinarily go further. desirable observations habeas corpus cases, prevailing 'Great Writ' forth 1963 Fay Noia, 372 391, 83 822, 837, Kaufman 217, 1068, 227. believe course fitting none faced up quite cases; decision; seems demand much 'purpose,' 'reliance,' 'administration' 249, far governing alike; developing stage. what ensues shall try suggest considerations appear lay bare complexities problem feel sufficiently explored leaving expression definitive views germane. A. 38 While, argued, reviewing obligation decisive issue raised parties never corpus. Brown Allen, 344 443, 73 397, 97 469 (1953), claim opportunity raise original proceeding.2 449—463, 854—861; Bator, Finality Criminal Habeas Corpus Prisoners, 76 Harv.L.Rev. 441, 463 (1963). With restricted way, arose infrequently one days. Even Brown, erode finality judgments substantial degree. rare appeal. permit Sunal Large, 332 174, 67 1588, 91 1982 (1947). 39 conflict became major importance For instances, successfully attack conviction collaterally fact suggested proceedings. Noia opened door large numbers relitigate 40 continue broader constitutes indefensible departure historical defined federalism formed bedrock development. Nevertheless, score prevailed, re-examination corpus, myself obliged bottom spawned, matter greatest process era increasingly rapid change. 41 greatly expanded writ principal functions. 229, 1075; Mishkin, Supreme 1964 Term—Foreword: High Great Writ, Due Process Law, 79 56, 77—101 First, assure man incarcerated procedure creates impermissibly risk innocent convicted. follows significantly improve pre-existing procedures habeas. Brother Black's 235—236, 1078—1079. habeas, concerned substantially affect apparatus trial. Under notions, 224—226, 1073—1074, threat serves necessary additional incentive appellate throughout land proceedings manner standards. order perform deterrence function, not, make clear, prevailed place. 42 theory complex seemingly recognized. determine really well-established closely analogous previously Only ago, example, define precision conditions issuance warrant Spinelli 410, 584, 637 (1969). encountered precis Spinelli, rested he judge himself affiant's activity 333 10, 14, 68 367, 369, 92 436 (1948); Aguilar Texas, 378 108, 1509, 723 (1964). Surely, One rigid partisan Blackstone recognize many, grounded change dramatically year year, meanings altered slowly subtly generation succeeds generation. context appears against assurance ruled differently petitioner's final. 43 Olmstead, Goldman, Lee,3 that. significance. collateral toe line, faulted when, stare decisis, authoritatively anyone responsible changing rules, 44 situation, decisis always complete answer conviction. Consider, existed 734 (1961). notes 248; went way toward rejecting supporting rules. Amendment's protection 'not inevitably measureable ancient majority's warning: 'We occasion re-examine here, decline beyond it, fraction inch.' 683. hard lawyer worthy name could, reading Silverman, rely confidence vitality improper follow Silverman.4 Given persuasively argued decided.5 C. 45 course, lesser innovations decade witnessed revolutionary changes premises hitherto difficulties arise landmark insist stood possible argue, 1081 (1961), imposing indication confronted Bill Rights guarantees incorporated Clause Fourteenth position incorporating various provisions arising 46 guarantee States. 106 Malloy Hogan, 1489, 653 (1964), beginning Fifth privilege self-incrimination, Duncan Louisiana, 391 145, 1444, 491 (1968), required provide basis Government. 47 Neither positions squarely BLACK'S 'incorporationist' philosophy pristine purity, Adamson 46, 68—123, 1672, 1674—1711, 1903 (1947), respond claims defendants. However, full-blown form. Instead, embarked 'selective incorporation' nature examined imposed ad hoc approach, place conception certainly due incorporated. relationship purposes Escobedo, Miranda, Wade, Gilbert decisions6 presents concept. 'line-up' Wade Gilbert, affirmative requirements accused obtain counsel 'critical stage' process, officials courts, might assume critical stages comparably treated. Similarly, Escobedo Illinois Sixth station. Gideon Wainwright, 335, 792, 799 (1963), proposition free indigents 49 doubtless true encounters problems chart proper implications well paramount 'choice law' simple possible, announced. obviously simpler, simplicity purchased cost compromising judged dominant 50 pretend exhausted foregoing canvassed take look going administered accordance basics tradition. Unfortunately, attempt task. subscribe Appeals. remand reconsideration 52 FORTAS, 53 Kaiser York, 280, 1044, 274 244, 1030, wiretap 1967. day decided formal coup de grace moribund 944 (1928). grants absolution invasions individual privacy wiretaps devices trespass, holds command reference significance deprive persons rights, diminish Constitution; imply availability circumstances respectfully submit, compelling. agree. 54 says authority 'retroactive,' gives 'retroactively': (1) 'was past' repudiated Olmstead's accused's home office, 248, 1033; (2) excluding invasion aided 'retrospective' ruling; (3) alike, justifiably Olmstead; (4) unduly 'retroactively.' derives commencing L Ed.2d only.2 55 pervasive adds unhappy dimensions 'non-retroactivity' Not provision, court-made implementing mandate3 statutory principle,4 class chance operation calendar; face novel unanticipated. statement contrary discuss, unsupportable. 56 challenge power newly devised situations, accommodation longstanding interpretations. Most emerged dealing unpresaged practical future, acutely disruptive practice institutions. pressures comity hesitancy drastically nullify actions lent special force DeStefano 2093 deemed prosecutions 1444 Bloom Illiniois, 194, 1477 57 thereby let stand rendered faulty Constitution. 'non-retroactiviey' exist, 'non-retroactively' applied. insisted persons, selected calendar, declared central reliability adjudged guilty. See, e.g., Roberts Russell, 1921, 1100 (1968) (holding Bruton 123, 1620, 476 (1968)); McConnell Rhay, 2, 32, Mempa 128, 254, 336 (1967)); Arsenault Com. Massachusetts, 5, 35, White Maryland, 373 59, 1050, 193 (1963)); (1969) Barber Page, 390 1318, 255 (1963); Illinois, 351 585, 100 891 (1956); Jackson 368, 1774, 908 58 decides lawfulness occurring controlled agrees false insupportable meant something afterwards; meaning victims not. 59 substantive ever justified, compelling circumstances. Such possibly exist related extended Government, 'retroactive' extreme justice; unanticipated Court; directly 1772 B t justification widely intervening discredited, expressly overruled. category. administer action claiming continued vitality. breathes life corpse. affirms telephone recorded wiretap. calls coconspirator bar Manhattan. installed terminal box building located. 61 taps issued statute. cannot, support use evidence, 41, 1873, 1040, June statute requirements. rests instead intercepted assertion viable overheard. agents attached 'uninvited ear' microphone outer inner panel double separating distinction, immunized attack. sanction differentiation. panel, used impinged 1/1000th inch rented petitioners, sanctified result. (1961).5 63 nonsense, suppose rational agree; am unwilling majority foreseen ensuing development uninhibited searching seizing words others, nevertheless allowed perimeter citizens' unseen invasion. 64 thoroughly killing Olmstead. Prior left physical-trespass lifeless awaiting death certificate gave it. They demonstrated willing message shield outside pro erty line. Clinton Virginia, 377 158, 1186, 213 65 years, day, peculiar distinction.6 Statements Department quaint constriction individual's area privacy.7 Omnibus Crime Control Safe Streets Act 1968, enacted Congress, long-out-moded permissible impermissible privacy. authorization surveillance, involve trespass. Pub.L. 90—351, Tit. III, 82 Stat. 211. purports warrants eavesdropping, makes absurd describes. N.Y.Code Crim.Proc. 813—a. 66 devotion wiretapping intense induce exploit techniques last spade earth shoveled corpse unfortunate consequences validate kind foot-dragging. reward fought battle uncontrolled bitter end, undelivered, verdict. add approval honor Constitution's mandate acceptable inescapable specifics award dunce caps officers, public inevitable decree specifically articulating immanent fulfillment generously mandates elucidates them. full realization great charter liberty, achieved alone. History embrace needed us hold, millimeter millimeter, infringement guarantees. depends conceptual faithfulness decisional obedience. Certainly, encourage disregard plain purport opt let's-wait-until-it's-decided approach. itself. acknowledged ceased 'It (physical) foreclose inquiry, 457, 464, 466, 565, 567, 568, 944; 134—136, 995—997, 1322, tangible property. '(t)he interests Government seize discredited.' Warden, Md. Penitentiary Hayden, 387 294, 304, 1642, 1648, 782. divided supposed material fell ambit narrow rested. governs items, extends statememts overheard 'technical local 682, 734. Once acknowledged, 'areas'—against becomes 70 conclude controlling. *' 71 itself 'eroded decisions' 'since (it) rested,' past'? 'retroactive.' formally 'reach (the Amendment) enclosure,' protection. violated, entitled, citizens, rights. circumstances, utterly fail justified. indeed paradox role bury here being revive 614, amended, U.S.C. 173 provides pertinent part: unlawful bring narcotic drug territory jurisdiction *.' 174 'Whoever fraudulently imports brings jurisdiction, receives, conceals, buys, sells, facilitates transportation, concealment, sale imported brought in, knowing conspires commit acts laws imprisoned five twenty and, addition, fined $20,000.' occupied separated doors small air space According testimony agents—which credited below exhaustive hearing included reconstruction equipment room—the taped side. turned 3/8-inch sill, towel over along minimize interference sounds agents' cable run amplifier recorder bathroom contend installation equivalent airspace acted sound chamber, facilitating pickup next door. unable, distinguish condoned sensitive receiver partition wall. Petitioners' misplaced. heating duct conductor 'an integral petitioners,' 682 penetrate house 'spike microphone' employed. 889. 943, 1131. mention relate disclosure peals instances admittedly trespassory remanded disclosures. monitoring episode during 1962—1963, Florida restaurant. directed owner restaurant Dioguardi talking about operations log sheets covering entire period Judge camera inspection, relating furnished defense. bugging car Nebbia, Desist, LeFranc furtherance conspiracy. Again records pertaining Palmieri, extensive unrestrained cross-examine witnesses, 'evidence petitioners) rights.' F.Supp. 690, 700. Palmieri found 1962—1963 totally unlated events conspiracy, transpired later. regard instance, 'did nothing coherent obtained.' 692. findings supported entitled. 165, 961, 176. 343 747, 967, 96 1270. 362, 517 (Harlan, J., concurring); 372, 519, 522 (Black, . Wong Sun 371 471, 485, 407, 441; Lanza 370 139, 142, 1218, 1220, 384; 734; Irvine 347 74 381, 98 561. referred observation Warden 782, 44, 50—53, 64, 1876, 1879—1881, 1886, 1040; 213; Lopez 427, 437—439, 1381, 1387—1388, 462; 510 682—683. 1308; 727, 1777, 882; 413, 463, 453; 601. 295, 1922, 1100; Witherspoon 510, 523, n. 22, 1770, 776. areas 'purpose' offered weaker support. 298, conceded aimed avoiding unfairness enhancing identification evidence'; 730, 1779, 'Escobedo guard unreliable statements in-custody interrogation'; 414, whole values ag inst self-incrimination represents,' including 'our privilege, sometimes 'a shelter guilty,' often innocent." 414—415, 464. 908; 799; 891. 1103, 605. informed brief '(i)nstead wholesale thousands felons, probably affected (by Katz), played cases.' 48—49, 1878—1879, handful prohibited regulated b officials. 1199; cited 13, nonfinal convictions: '(Mapp) applies rendition opinion.' 622, 1734. Ker 374 23, 1623, 726; Fahy Connecticut, 85, 171; Stoner 376 483, 889, 856. O'Connor 286, 445, 337, shortly Actually, was, Amendments, member five-man relying 661—666, 1694—1698 concurring). 1780, 417, 453. Unreasonable seizures, fact, viotion 'reasonably' measuring 356, 514, 576; 221—222, 245 1056—1057, 1069, 246. FORTAS suggests denies mandate.' 271, 1048, 1049. extend served. 'has guilt' trial.' 1742, 1743. Of benefited date, DOUGLAS observes, technically But, 301, 1972, litigants unavoidable consequence adjudications mere dictum.' Whatever inequity arguably 'chance beneficiaries' insignificant adherence decision-making.' nonconstitutional 1166 aftermath general made, attacked constitutionality Ex parte Siebold, 371, 717 (1880). Since, proscribe imprisoned, jail. (1928); 1322 (1942); 1270 (1952). After decided, careful frame avoided. 439, 1388, 462 that: (Olmstead Goldman) involves 'eavesdropping' sense term. listen otherwise heard. participant 1040 York's contained vague '(t)his obviates raised.' 1876. declaration protect conversations. hardly strengthen lawyer's court's doctrine, rooted Finally, suggestion unexplicated per curiam reversal premised 11, Clark predicated seven members based. opinion, unable adopt proposes. 1961, undermined conscientious department Silverman. assumes 'conceptual faithfulness' obedience' announce. 277, 1052. 478, 1758, 977 694 218, 1926, 1149 263, 1951, 1178 illegally admissible prosecutions, 'retroactively'. (1966), violates comment defendant's failure testify defense, pretrial lineup, 1477, 1934, 605, 'prospectivity' 'nonretroactivity' varied announcement contrast, begun apt coincide conduct. 1602 (1966) (rules concerning interrogation); 1684 (1961) (exclusionary rule). wiretap, agree early 1937 Act, received Nardone 302 379, 275, 314. whimsicality sequence cope command. (1942). Hearing S.Res. Subcommittee Constitutional Senate Committee Judiciary, 86th Cong., 1st Sess., pt. 4, 1034—1035, 1036 (1959); Hearings S. 1086, 1221, 1495, 1822 87th 372—373 (1961); 2813 1495 2d 11—46 (1962); Procedure 89th 3, 1154—1165 (1965); 2187 bills Laws Procedures 33—35 90th 48—58 Brownell, Public Security Wire Tapping, Cornell L.Q. 195 (1954); Rogers, Case Yale L.J. 792 (1954).

Category: 0