Document: 377 U.S. 126 84 S.Ct. 1156 12 L.Ed.2d 172 HATTIESBURG BUILDING AND TRADES COUNCIL et al.v.J. D. BROOME, etc., al. No. 669. Decided April 27, 1964. Ralph N. Jackson, for petitioners. Richard C. Keenan, respondents. Solicitor General Cox, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come, the United States, as amicus curiae. PER CURIAM. 1 After finding that primary employer was not in commerce ruling pre-emption rule of San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 236, 79 773, 3 775, therefore applicable, state court enjoined picketing at premises secondary employer. The judgment must be reversed. jurisdictional standards established by National Labor Relations Board (see 2o N.L.R.B.Ann.Rep. 8 (1958)) may satisfied reference to business operations either or Truck Drivers Local 649, 93 N.L.R.B. 386; Teamsters 554, 110 1769; Madison Bldg. & Const. Council, 134 517. Here, record clearly shows, employer's met requirements. Since union's activities this case were arguably an unfair labor practice, Sailors' Union Pacific, 92 547, had no jurisdiction issue injunction. 775; 438 Construction Laborers' AFL—CIO Curry, 371 542, 83 531, 9 514. Accordingly, petition certiorari is granted

Category: 9