Document: 373 U.S. 379 83 S.Ct. 1322 10 L.Ed.2d 428 Alexander T. SPERRY, Petitioner,v.STATE OF FLORIDA ex rel. THE BAR. No. 322. Argued March 25, 1963. Decided May 27, [Syllabus from pages 379-380 intentionally omitted] Carlisle M. Moore, Mellin, Hanscom & Hursh, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. F. Trowbridge vom Baur, Washington, D.C., respondent. [Amicus Curiae 380-381 Mr. Chief Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of Court. 1 Petitioner is a practitioner registered to practice before United States Patent Office. He has not been admitted law Florida or any other bar. Alleging, among things, that petitioner 'is engaged in unauthorized law, although he member The Bar, nevertheless maintains an office * Tampa, Florida, holds himself out public as Attorney represents clients Office, rendered opinions patentability, and prepared various legal instruments, including applications amendments letters patent, filed same Office D.C.,' Bar instituted these proceedings Supreme Court enjoin performance specified acts within State. answer which above allegations but pleaded defense 'that work performed by him citizens solely presented charges fees his preparing prosecuting patent assignments determinations incident assignments.' Thereupon, court granted Bar's motion summary decree permanently enjoined pursuing following activities until unless became State Bar: 2 '1. using term 'patent attorney' holding be attorney at this state field phase (we recognize respondent according record us already voluntarily ceased use word 'attorney'); 3 '2. rendering opinions, patentability infringement on rights; 4 '3. preparing, drafting construing documents; 5 '4. out, state, qualified prepare prosecute thereto; 6 '5. preparation prosecution thereto, state; 7 '6. otherwise engaging law.' 8 concluded petitioner's conduct constituted State, acting under its police power, could properly prohibit, neither federal statute nor Constitution empowered body authorize such Florida. 140 So.2d 587. 9 In petition certiorari, attacked injunction 'only insofar it prohibits specific (referred above), covered license does claim right engage would regarded law.'1 We 371 875, 148, 113, consider significant, narrow, questions thus presented. do question determination others constitutes law. Greenough v. Tax Assessors, 333 486, 67 1400, 91 L.Ed. 1621; Murdock Memphis, 20 Wall. 590, 22 429. Such inevitably requires advise their inventions statutory criteria, 35 U.S.C. §§ 101—103, 161, 171, well advisability relying upon alternative forms protection may available It also involves participation specification claims application, § 112, long ago noted 'constitute(s) one most difficult instruments draw with accuracy,' Topliff Topliff, 145 156, 12 825, 831, 36 658. And rejection assist amendments, 37 CFR 1.117—1.126, frequently written argument establish claimed invention applicable rules light prior art. 1.119. Nor we doubt substantial interest regulating that, absence legislation, validly prohibit nonlawyers circumscribed form practice.2 11 But 'the though enacted exercise powers controverted, must yield' when incompatible legislation. Gibbons Ogden, Wheat. 1, 211, 23. Congress provided Commissioner Patents 'may prescribe regulations governing recognition agents, attorneys, persons representing applicants parties Office,' 31,3 Commissioner, pursuant 31, regulation '(a)n applicant represented agent authorized cases.' 1.31. (Emphasis added.) current two separate registers 'on are entered names all recognized entitled represent patent.' 1.341. One register attorneys 1.341(a), nonlawyer 'agents.' 1.341(b). A person either category only establishing good moral character repute possessed scientific technical qualifications necessary enable render patents valuable service, competent them presentation Office.' 1.341(c). expressly permits non-lawyers, explicitly authority. If authorization unqualified, then, virtue Supremacy Clause, deny those failing meet own perform functions scope enforce licensing requirements which, valid regulation, give State's board virtual power review over determination' agency certain functions,4 impose activity sanctioned additional conditions contemplated Congress.5 'No can hinder obstruct free act Congress.' Pennsylvania Wheeling Belmont Bridge Co., 13 How. 518, 566, 14 249. Respondent argues, however, read into conferred condition inconsistent leaving practitioners unqualified physical presence District Columbia, where now located. language affords plausible support view provision '(r) egistration shall entitle suggests meaning limitation clarified reference predecessor provision, registration 'shall construed authorizing members bar Fed.Reg. 2429. Yet progression more without tends indicate was intended emphasize general sanctions services reasonably applications. That no further shown contrast trademark cases, issued Patents. These provide '(r)ecognition section sanctioning jurisdiction 2.12(d). comparison perhaps sufficiently telling. possible uncertainty dispelled fact present were amended 1948,6 first proposed add similar appearing regulations.7 After objection had leveled against revision ground 'indicated thinks states have circumscribe limit rights who lawyers,'8 sweeping deleted wording modified form. 15 Bereft regulations, directs legislative history confirm understanding 31 provisions designed condoned Insofar provides insight intent Congress, convinced interpretation asks assumptions acted century. 16 Examination development governmental reveals that: (1) practiced inception, express approval knowledge Congress; (2) during prolonged congressional study unethical practices agents went unquestioned, there suggestion abuses might curbed regulation; (3) despite protests bar, enacting Administrative Procedure Act refused administrative agencies lawyers; (4) defended value while taking steps protect interests prohibiting find implicit (and administrative) confers regard whether conducted conduct. 17 regulate dates back 1861, 'for gross misconduct refuse agent, generally particular case *.'9 'Rules Directions' 1869 '(a)ny intelligence appear filing proper attorney.'10 From outset, number capacity engineers chemists familiar subjects application related. 'Many probably never occurred anybody they should be.'11 Moreover, concentration developed since reorganization 1836 personal attendance Washington unnecessary business transacted writing.12 bulk scattered throughout country, so distributed many years.13 As practical matter, if located, easily consult inventors whom deal, effectiveness often considerably impaired.14 Respondent's confined Columbia assumes ignorance disregard long-established practice. 18 Despite early subject professional restraints lawyer brethren, particularly responsible deceptive advertising victimization plagued Office.15 To remedy abuses, 1899 required practicing Office16 and, 1918, obtain material distributed.17 reach evils given much when, 1922, attorneys.18 19 This modification statute, 1912, 'creation bar' 'to require higher standard registry.'19 Although brought attention House Committee included lawyers alike,20 suggested exclusion. fact, time expressed eliminated restricting lawyers,21 successor unwise pendency legislation recommended limitation: 'It times privilege practising after examination examinations held admission believed requirement severe, specially trained educational advantages careful useful arts learn adequately Fundamentally important than men type mind acquire readily.'22 21 consideration 1916 another bill curb abusive practitioners, government officials literature,23 point made floor House: 'Mr. OGLESBY. I will say gentleman attorneys. commissioner stated hearing considered anyone except regularly excluded reasons thought, perhaps, ought rule.'24 23 Disclosure falsely themselves led 1938 enactment making misrepresentation criminal offense.25 corrective decade originally contained several provisions, prohibited 'duly (from holding) attorney, lawyer, solicitor, counselor legally Columbia.'26 During extended matter both Houses distinction between lawyers, repeatedly out;27 again clear restrict prevent labeling attorneys,'28 theretofore permitted.29 bills affected 'any draftsmen doing things always Office';30 sought bring about change status regardless *.'31 '(T)here quite solicitors highly graduated doesn't disqualify men. They continue qualify agents.'32 When asked '(w)hat going difference prerogatives come in,' responded '(t)heir exactly same. Their courts different.'33 debates 1930 reveal understanding: 24 STAFFORD. impression hereafter order some 25 LaGUARDIA. my understanding. 26 PERKINS. correct myself. passage hold counselor. 27 being Patents? 28 may.'34 29 Hence, period 1922 considered, readoption 1952,35 strong unchallenged implications repeated efforts assure attempt significance. insignificant perpetrated corrected States. contrary, reform effected pass rigorous 1.341(c), strictly regulates advertising, 1.345, demands '(a)ttorneys conform standards ethical States.' 1.344. 30 extent specialized lay allowed 40-odd agencies, received continuing 1952.36 General's 1941, studied need procedural reported '(e)specially lawyers' organizations manifest sentiment recent years agencies. doubts interdiction wise *.'37 Ultimately 6(a) '(e)very party accorded counsel duly representative proceeding. Nothing herein grant proceeding.' 60 Stat. 240, 1005(a). disavows intention existing each determined agency, contains admit nonlawyers, see way conditioned Chairman American Association's committee testified Judiciary Committee: 'A great deal complaint sources. Number chiefly Interstate Commerce Commission, afraid something said oust On hand, protest committees local, municipal associations just vehement saying measures fail procedure lawyers. eliminate practitioner, feels function desires practice.'38 32 concern associations, Senate 'nonlawyers, permitted it, interested matters.'39 instructive passage: 33 AUSTIN. President, Senator leaves wish ask question. notice referring, language: 34 "Nothing 'Is somewhere distinguished reserved non-professional—that is, man lawyer—to appear, having it? discretion permitted, not? For example, take expert better Commission involved lawyer. somewhere, McCARRAN. correct; connection comment, follows: "This subsection with, qualify, provides, moreover, nothing capacity. Control remains respective agencies.' 38 'That observation.'40 note shortly adoption Act, Association 'Administrative Practitioners Act.'41 Though limiting nonattorneys respects here relevant, did 'authorized proceedings' permissible, performed.42 39 Indicative understanding, every considering problem 1952 agreed authority participate consistent pre-emptive law.43 40 Finally, underlying considerations renders conclude operating boundaries directed problem. issuance rights. bestowed 'To promote Progress Science Arts, securing limited Times Authors Inventors exclusive Right Writings Discoveries,' Art. I, 8, cl. accomplish end, 18, established. Government, amicus curiae, informs 7,544 November 1962, 1,801 1,687 practicing.44 respondent's view, one-quarter disqualification relocation one-fourth, reciprocity them, forced relocate, apply discontinue disruptive effect cannot ignored. primarily concerned protecting unskilled practitioners,45 seen, safeguards testing registration, insisting maintenance high integrity. Failure comply result suspension disbarment. 32; 1.348. So successful able inform Hoover 'there significant respect ability handle conduct.'46 41 control borders accomplishment objectives.47 42 overlooked constitutional arguments, singularly merit. source Congress' doubted establishment process appropriate plainly adapted end discoveries, plausibly exceeded bounds what end. Cf. Goldsmith Board Appeals, 270 117, 46 215, 70 494; Bernardin Duell, 172 576, 286, 43 559. 'delegated Constitution,' limits Tenth Amendment concurrent effects 'Interference criterion Congress. given, it; interfere laws, even II Annals 1897 (remarks Madison). 'states truism retained surrendered.' Darby, 312 100, 124, 61 451, 462, 85 609; Case Bowles, 327 92, 102, 66 438, 443, 90 552. Compare Leslie Miller, Inc. Arkansas, 352 187, 77 257, 231. less displaces exercised judiciary rather legislature. R. Co. Public Service Comm., 250 36, 64 1142. sufficient guide admissions policy avoid criticism improperly delegated agency. Fahey Mallonee, 332 245, 1552, 2030; Currin Wallace, 306 16—18, 59 379, 387—388, 441. follows enjoining vacated performing tasks judgment below remanded opinion. ordered. 44 Judgment remanded. Petitioner's refer 'Patent Attorney' mooted voluntary discontinuance 'attorney.' See Konigsberg California, 366 41, 81 997, 1001—1002, 105; Schware Examiners New Mexico, 353 232, 239, 752, 756, 796; West Virginia Earley, 144 W.Va. 504, 109 S.E.2d 420; Gardner Conway, 234 Minn. 468, 48 N.W.2d 788. July 19, 1952, c. 950, 795, 31: 'The Secretary Commerce, representatives persons, show reputation advice, assistance 190, 259, 231; First Iowa Hydro-Electric Coop. Federal Power 328 152, 906, 1143; cf. Castle Hayes Freight Lines, Inc., 348 61, 75 191, 99 68; Cloverleaf Butter Patterson, 315 62 491, 86 754. Rice Santa Fe Elevator Corp., 331 218, 235—236, 1146, 1154—1155, 1447; Moran Orleans, 112 69, 38, 653; Sinnot Davenport, 227, 243; 23; Huron Portland Cement Detroit, 362 440, 449, 80 813, 819, 852 (dissenting opinion); Hill 325 538, 65 1373, 89 1782. 9596. Proposed Revision Rules 5.1, 611 O.G.Pat.Off., June 29, 1948, Supp. 8: 'Registration agents. Registration performed.' 'I think know you mean say, say. stopped clause closer right; but, here, 'In words, giving up laws suggest derogating created rule, proposed, makes states, indicated individual states. part your rule.' Remarks A. P. Kane, Attorney, Hearing Practice Cases, 281—282 (Sept. 30, 1948). id., pp. 319—330. 2, 88, 247; 1870, 230, 200, amended, 793, 6. Directions Proceedings 127 (Aug. 1869). Letter Edward S. Rogers, Hearings H.R. 5527, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 84 (1928); Hoosier Drill Ingels, O.G.Pat.Off. 1013; Robinson, 431. 'Personal unnecessary. done correspondence, (free postage) attorney.' Information Persons Having Business Transact (July 1836). 1854, '(a)ll writing. *' 122 (Feb. 20, 1854). 1.2. Roster Attorneys Agents Registered Before (1958); Names Addresses Practicing (1883); Testimony E. Robertson, Patents, 699, 71st 2d 12. Commencing 1848, informed '(i)f desired, found offices city, cities.' (1848). Berle, Inventions Management, 189—190; Hoar, Tactics Law (3d ed.), 256—257; Woodling, Protection (2d 289—290, 333; Rivise, Preparation Prosecution Applications, 42. 16—18; 69 Cong.Rec. 6580; Spencer, System, 94—96. 184—186. H.R.Rep. 1622, 68th 2—3; 364, 64th 2; 1899). edition 1897. 252 967. 1.345. February 58, 3, 390. 6, 4, 1884, 181, 5, 101, 493. B. Petents, 23417, 62d 6—7. 210, 67th 16; Annual Report, xii (1908). colloquy regarding identical introduced session Congressman Himes Patents: HIMES. seems me happens be. Must simply goes gets ROBERTSON. shows degree proficiency write specifications, bar? bad sounds. Some our best older line There very fine ones honest men, thing reach.' 15—16. 5011, 5012, 7010, 66th 281. vi (1893). xiv (1915). April 1916, 89, 54. 53 6313. 9, 1938, 52 342; 796, 33. so-called 'Cramton bill,' Sess.; Cong.,, 5811, 69th 10735, 5790, E.g., 4—7, 51; 34, 49. S.Rep. 628, 4; 7, 59; Petents 14—25, 28—33, 56—76, 85—100; 10; 2—5, 41. Prior listed single referred Attorneys. previously appellation. 947, 4. containing failed gain (though passing repeatedly), suggestions course hearings, 46; 26—27, established 495 715, 1.341, enrolled register, one, changed. 1209, 1. 626, 728, 3. Statement W. Bradford, Ethics Association, 61. 15. 72 5467. No changes substance revision. 1979, 82d 1923, U.S.Code Congressional News p. 2394. Report Admission Over Agencies (1938); Survey Legal Profession, Standards (1953); Government Operations, Study Organization, Procedure, Agencies, 85th (Comm.Print); Note, Restriction Lay Col,. L.Rev. 120. Final 124 (1941). Organization Executive Branch Services 32—35, 40—44 (1955). 79th (Serial 19) 33—34, Legislative History S.Doc. 248, 79—80 (hereinafter 'Legislative History'). S.Comm.Print (June 1945), 26. 92 2156, 316—317. 2657, 80th Curry, Bills Sponsored Seek Prevent Nonlawyers I.C.C.Pract.J. 491. 'Credentials 'SEC. individuals rule therefor appearances counsel, hereunder Admintrative compulsory process. individually maintained standing, actively certified credentials enabling deemed permit place service save holders credentials; impliedly expressly, hereunder.' Chicago Ass'n Kellogg, 338 Ill.App. 618, 88 N.E.2d 519 (1949) (Patent Office); Sharp Mida's Research Bureau, Sup., 45 N.Y.S.2d 690 (1943), aff'd, 267 App.Div. 980, 799 (1944) Schroeder Wheeler, 126 Cal.App. 367, P.2d 903 (1932) People Colorado Erbaugh, Colo. 480, 94 349 (1908) Office) (by implication); re York County Lawyers (In Bercu), 273 524, 534—535, 78 209, 218 (1948), 299 N.Y. 87 451 (Treasury Tex Court) Auerbacher Wood, 139 N.J.Eq. 599, 604, A.2d 800, 803 (1947), 142 484, 863 (1948) (N.L.R.B.); De Pass Harris Wool 346 Mo. 1038, S.W.2d 146 (1940) (I.C.C.); Blair Motor Carriers Pa.Dist. Co.R. 413, 426 (1939) Bennett Goldsmith, 280 529, 927 (Immigration Department); Traffic Haworth Marble Ohio App. 255, 178 N.E. 703 (1931) (I.C.C.) (dictum); Gibbs, Ariz. 346, 355, 278 371, 374 (1929) (Land Mulligan Smith, 404, 76 1063 (1904) Lyon, 301 Mass. 74 (1938) (bankruptcy); Brooks Mandel-Witte 54 F.2d 992 (C.A.2d Cir.), cert. denied, 286 559, 641, 1292 (Customs Court). Lowell Loeb, 176, 184—185, 33—34 (1943) Normally, closely circumscribed. supra; supra. divergence developed. Battelle Memorial Inst. Green, 133 U.S.P.Q. 49 (Ohio Ct.App.1962) Office), Noble Hunt, 95 Ga.App. 804, 345 (1957) Court), Agran Shapiro, Cal.App.2d 807, 619 (App.Dept.Super.Ct., 1954) (Treasury); Wisconsin Keller, Wis.2d 377, 114 pending certiorari 429, 1962 Term Petition Kearney, 63 630 (Fla.1953) Court); Marshall Inventor's Club, 117 737 Com.Pl.1953) Office). constitute Goodman, Ill. 941, 111 A.L.R. 302 58 49, 82 562; Clark Austin, 340 467, 101 977. compare Reynolds Dinger, 193, 685; Realty Appraisals Astor-Broadway Holding A.D.2d 169 121. Of 73 Bar. Hexter Title Abstract Grievance Committee, Tex. 506, 509, 179 946, 948, 157 268; 180, 31. Task Force Part VI, Appendices Charts, Id., 158. qualification advertise. 16—19, 71 72, 90. 47 Because breadth case, called determine touching point. note, him, entirely reasonable work, misrepresent license.

Category: 5