Document: 382 U.S. 34 86 S.Ct. 157 15 L.Ed.2d 28 FIRST SECURITY NATIONAL BANK & TRUST CO.v.UNITED STATES. No. 141. Oct. 18, 1965. Paul A. Porter and Victor H. Kramer, for appellants. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney Turner Lionel Kestenbaum, the United States. PER CURIAM. 1 In States v. First National Bank, 376 665, 84 1033, 12 1, this Court held that merger of Bank Trust Co. Lexington, Kentucky, with Security Lexington to form violated § Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, U.S.C. 1. The Court's judgment remanded case District 'for further proceedings in conformity opinion Court.' Thereafter, on July 1964, ordered parties 'to report court progress made complying judgment' Supreme Court. On application parties, reporting date was thrice postponed permit negotiations between Government concerning an appropriate plan divestiture. When, final reporting, February 16, 1965, jointly presented only a proposed interlocutory decree providing detailed divestiture would be submitted within six months, Security, its executive officers directors contempt. Although there is some indication dissatisfied compliance bank order contempt itself entered because delay submitting failure comply mandate * *.' imposed fine $100 per day until had been purged by 'full 2 Judge's interpretation erroneous. We consistent opinion. Neither nor expressly dealt matter remedy neither any particular period time. Compare El Paso Natural Gas Co., 651, 662, 1044, 1050, (decided same as prior appeal directing without delay). No March month after has authority require obedience punish disobedience lawful orders decrees, 18 401, but record reveals nothing did or failed do which holding bank, reversed. 3 Reversed. 4 Mr. Justice FORTAS took no part consideration decision case.

Category: 0