Document: 400 U.S. 45 91 S.Ct. 158 27 L.Ed.2d 179 ARNOLD TOURS, INC., et al.v.William B. CAMP al. No. 602. Nov. 23, 1970. PER CURIAM. 1 Petitioners are 42 independent travel agents doing business in Massachusetts. They ask for declaratory and injunctive relief against the Comptroller of Currency South Shore National Bank. seek to invalidate a ruling by that, incidental their banking services, national banks may provide services customers.1 allege that as result they have lost substantial profits stand lose even greater future. contend exceeded his authority when he authorized services. 2 The District Court dismissed complaint lack standing Appeals affirmed. 408 F.2d 1147 (C.A. 1969). Following our decisions last Term Association Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp, 397 150, 90 827, 25 184, Barlow Collins, 159, 832, 192, we vacated remanded case reconsideration (397 315, 1109, 333) reaffirmed its previous decision. 3 Here, Processing, concerned with § 4 Bank Corporation Act, 76 Stat. 1132, 12 U.S.C. 1864.2 In did not rely on any legislative history showing Congress desired protect data processors alone from competition.3 Moreover, noted growing trend 'toward enlargement class people who protest administrative action.' U.S., at 154, S.Ct., 830. We held 'arguably brings competitor within zone interests protected it.' Id., 156, 831. Nothing opinion limited protecting only competitors data-processing field. When begin customers, compete no less than customers.4 Accordingly writ certiorari is granted, judgment reversed, proceedings consistent this opinion. 5 Reversed remanded. 6 THE CHIEF JUSTICE Mr. Justice HARLAN would set argument. Paragraph 7455 Comptroller's Manual Banks provides: 'Incident those powers vested them under 24, customers receive compensation therefor. Such include sale trip insurance rental automobiles, agent local service. connection therewith, advertise, develop, extend such purpose attracting bank.' 'No bank service corporation engage activity other performance banks.' Act mentioned was "response fears expressed few senators, without prohibition, bill enabled 'banks nonbanking activity,' S.Rep.No.2105 (87th Cong., 2d Sess., 7 12) (Supplemental vews Senators Proxmire, Douglas, Neuberger), thus constitute 'a serious exception accepted public policy which strictly limits banking.' views Muskie Clark)." 155, final question whether judicial review decision has been precluded, specifically resolved case. 157, 832.

Category: 8