Document: 517 U.S. 654116 S.Ct. 1638134 L.Ed.2d 880 HENDERSONv.UNITED STATESCertiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for Fifth Circuit. No. 95-232. Argued March 19, 1996 Decided May 20, Syllabus* Petitioner Henderson filed this suit under Suits in Admiralty Act injuries he received as a seaman aboard vessel owned by States. He accomplished service on manner and within time allowed Federal Rule Civil Procedure 4, which sets an extendable 120-day period service. Service Attorney General occurred 47 days after complaint was filed, but Attorney, though timely 4's deadline, took 147 days. The moved dismiss action, arguing that although satisfied requirements, had failed serve process ``forthwith'' required Section(s) 2 Act. District dismissed Henderson's lack subjectmatter jurisdiction, based Circuit precedent holding 2's requirement conditions Government's waiver sovereign immunity is therefore jurisdictional prerequisite. affirmed. Held: Act's instruction has been superseded 4. Pp. 6-19. (a) regime conflicts irreconcilably with instruction. Rules convey clear message complaints are not be if served 120 days, or such additional court may allow, indicative far shorter time. Government urges conflict dissolves one reads 4 establishing affirmative right outer boundary Reading its historical context, however, leads conclusion provision operates irreducible allowance. 6-9. (b) In Enabling Act, Congress ordered that, matters "practice procedure," 28 U. S. C. 2072(a), shall govern, "[a]ll laws rules no further force effect," 2072(b). Correspondingly, 82 provides cannot construed extend limit federal jurisdiction. Section contains broad first sentence, does mean, asserts, entirety ``jurisdictional.'' Several provisions, notably generous venue transfer well provision, sensibly typed "substantive" "jurisdictional." Instead, they have distinctly facilitative, "procedural" cast, dealing case processing, substantive rights consent suit. "forthwith" prescription made "jurisdictional" inclusion-along choices-in 2. best characterized rule procedure, kind supersedes. A plaintiff like Henderson, commencement action must resort instructions process. Rule, finds governing, inter alia, form issuance summons, summons together complaint, who process, proof also describes how effected various categories defendants. It uncontested all these prescriptions apply cases, just other cases. There reason why governing not, whole nonjurisdictional procedure" see consistent 82, rendering provisions "of 9-19. 51 F. 3d 574, reversed remanded. Ginsburg, J., delivered opinion Court, Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Breyer, JJ., joined. concurring opinion, Thomas, dissenting Rehnquist, O'Connor, Justice Ginsburg Court. 1 This concerns civil commenced injured Recovery cases governed 46 App. 741 et seq., broadly waives immunity. See 742 (money judgments); 743 (costs interest). allows effect court. instructs "forthwith." 742. question presented whether Rule. 2071 We hold actions arising law, compliance statute limitations, timing serving generally "procedure" controlled Rules. 3 * On August 27, 1991, petitioner Lloyd merchant mariner, while working operated April 8, 1993, exhausting administrative remedies, seaman's personal injury against States, pursuant 41 Stat. 525, amended, seq.1 Under suits "may brought . two years cause arises." 745. his period. suit, instructs, simply "by filing court."2 Having attempted follow undisputed following Rules, nothing furnished immediately relevant instructions. 4(a) (1988) provided: "Upon clerk forthwith issue deliver plaintiff's attorney, responsible prompt copy complaint." 4(b) "The signed clerk, [and] seal court." 4(d) stated: together."3 5 series slips obtaining counsel requested appropriate forms file-stamped copies day complaint. But did respond immediately. Counsel eventually obtained 21, completed returned them clerk. mailed him from clerk's office, sent certified mail, General,4 25. 6 local longer. 25, forwarded "constable" request June 1, constable's office documents, informing proper form, because it lacked court's seal. thereupon wrote requesting new repeated 19; ultimately, properly sealed summons. 7 Once again, and, 30, extension Attorney.5 granted motion, extending until September 15. 3, 1993. 8 Thus, personally 148 November 17, action. grounds for, disposition of, motion led petition certiorari. 9 never maintained notice 2-year limitation prescribed claims. 745; Tr. Oral Arg. 38-39 (counsel acknowledged gave actual three months before ended).6 Nor asserted any prejudice presentation defense stemming delayed And service, appears beyond debate, requirements (titled "Summons" detailing process). 10 support dismiss, relied exclusively 742, part: 11 libelant [plaintiff] libel [complaint] attorney [the] district [where brought] mail thereof registered States." 12 remained unchanged since enactment 1920, 18 became effective, admiralty were realm argued failure "forthwith," deprived subject-matter jurisdiction States' 13 initially denied reconsidered matter intervening decision, v. Holmberg, 19 1062, cert. denied, 513 ___ (1994). agreeing held "is condition thus, prerequisite." 3d, at 1064. so ruling, Holmberg rejected argument generality timely-filed now Procedure. 14 Bound Appeals, adhering 574 (CA5 1995).7 certiorari resolve disagreement among lower courts authorizes supersedes "forthwith."8 II 15 suggests prescription, instruction, can should read harmoniously. 4(j) commenced,9 16 "(j) Summons: Time Limit Service. If upon defendant party whose behalf show good period, ." Fed. Civ. Proc. (1988). 17 prescribes supra, 5, word precisely defined than apparent dissolves, urges, "an [a] complaint" only Brief 14, 18, 26; 28, 30. reject view authorize we conclude subject reduction, Prior 1983, contained Until changes installed year, marshals attended read: "(a) issuance. Upon marshal person authorized 4(c) it. 20 21 marshal, deputy, some specially appointed purpose 22 Marshals expected expeditiously, 41(b), providing dismissal "[f]or prosecute," could invoked check unreasonable delay. Wright & A. Miller, Practice 2370, pp. 374-376 (2d ed. 1995); J. Moore, Moore's Para(s) 4.18, p. 436 1995). 23 operative 1983 shift responsibility plaintiff. Mullenix, Hope Over Experience: Mandatory Informal Discovery Politics Rulemaking, 69 N. L. Rev. 795, 845 (1991). With longer available routine servers, Judicial Conference considered control necessary; proposed, approved, limit. relaxed change authorizing showed "good cause." 6-7; 128 Cong. Rec. 30931-30932 (1982), reprinted App., 647. 24 Most recently, 1993 amendments accorded discretion enlarge "even there shown." Advisory Committee's Notes 654.10 tellingly, text out, "[a] specific instance cause," ibid., allowance "a reasonable time" "cur[e] multiple officers either General" 4(i)(3). 25 thus message: Complaints allow. Furthermore, acknowledges aside, applies full range litigation, including Tort Claims 2675, Tucker ch. 359, 505 (1887) (current version 1346, 1491 scattered sections C.). 33. turn dispositive question: Does supersede inconsistent statutory direction? III 26 Supreme "to prescribe general practice procedure appeals," directs: 27 "Such abridge, modify right. All taken effect." confirmation understanding former Equity provides: "[The Procedure] therein." 1937 821 (Rule confirms Rules' claim joinder "does jurisdiction."); 3141, 210-214. 29 According latter affects "substantive rights" setting terms contrast, characterizes processing rule. part 745's direction conduct litigation once launched court-a characteristically "how to" with, by, 30 Before examining determine character note relatively recent vintage. personam maritime torts, enacted advent processed, 1845 1966, discrete Even year governance Procedure, co-exist. recounted, originally "[u]pon service," marshal. 7-8. when plaintiffs without aid came into force, rendered frame irreconcilable 742's 31 captioned "Libel personam," sentence: 32 "In where [a States] privately proceeding maintained, nonjury 33 743, "Procedure completes costs interest money judgments States.11 Bodcaw Co., 440 202, 203-204, n. (1979); 54(d)(1) (absent statute, liable costs); Library Shaw, 478 310, 314 (1986) 34 asserts sentence section "jurisdictional," spelling out immunity, contrast next governs "procedure," specifying proceed heard determined according principles law between private parties." 26-27; 1064; Libby 840 2d 818, 820 (CA11 1988) ("The fact declared procedures specified indicates more procedural."). dissent adopts hook, line, sinker. post, 3-4 (finding key structure Congress' placement (46 742) rather 743)). "purely procedural," Sovereign's immunityas interest, pervasively waiver, preceding reads: 35 parties suing, them, reside their principal place business charged liability found." 36 generous-to-plaintiffs will recognized instantly describing choices, Cf. 1391 ("Venue generally"). final 37 application may, court, transferred 38 1404 (change convenient forum); 1406 (authorizing transfer, dismissal, improperly laid). simultaneously added Public Vessels set dismissals avoided wrong statute. Rep. 1894, 86th Cong., Sess., 2-5 (1960); cf. 1631 review agency sought court). short, reining "jurisdiction," afford forum choices spare suing Act.12 39 critical 40 observed oral argument, 27-28, dispatch mail." sovereign-immunity agreed, depend sole mailing authorizes; "in age," said, "certified would acceptable." 28-29. 7, ("jurisdiction Act] use mail"). several cast. They deal suit.13 42 4? address question, preliminary issue. 4(j), 2074 (rules transmitted "not later 1" become effective "no earlier December same unless otherwise provides). Amendments 1982, 2, 96 2527. 8. As acknowledges, conflicting less prescribes. 16, ("We agree 2072(b) evidence congressional intent regarding construction interaction laws."). 43 Returning need linger over answer. What elaboration below, lead securely response: part. 44 nn. service.14 defendants,15 including, detail, "the Its Agencies, Corporations, Officers."16 prescriptions, uncontested, service17 Jones Laughlin Steel, Inc. Mon River Towing, Inc., 772 62, 66 (CA3 1985) (just "now method actions, party," "congressional uniform accomplishing process" prior particular, service"); Kenyon 676 1229, 1232 (CA9 1981) (Boochever, concurring) ("I logical different [Suits cases] defendant.").18 45 come understand, regarded adjudicate controversy particular kind,19 individual entity.20 essential auxiliary, distinct aired dissent, wrenching extensively relies-who sue,21 what claims,22 relief,23 limitations period.24 core function supply pendency legal affords fair opportunity answer present defenses objections.25 Seeing light, system provides, displaced current effect. For reasons stated, judgment affirming reversed, remanded proceedings opinion. ordered. 48 djq whom Kennedy joins, concurring. 49 I join write separately make my view, do understand hold, procedural jurisdictional. assuredly power strict attached result comply deprive stated think legislative scheme here makes condition. 50 Chief O'Connor join, dissenting. (SAA) entitles restriction demands delimits entertain majority's supplanted (now 4(m)) rests misreading SAA our jurisprudence. Because believe intended restrict those receives forthwith, respectfully dissent. 52 sovereign, immune save consents sued." Sherwood, 312 584, 586 (1941). "A necessary corollary attaches legislation waiving strictly observed, exceptions thereto lightly implied." Block North Dakota ex rel. Board Univ. School Lands, 461 273, 287 (1983). Lehman Nakshian, 453 156, 160-161 (1981) ("Like itself, `unequivocally expressed,' `this long decided sued implied'" (citations omitted)). involves affect analysis, many embodied statutes strictly, eye effectuating restrictive relinquishes immunity." Honda Clark, 386 484, 501 (1967). 53 always, starting point interpreting extent waiver. "[i]n [of operated, cargo possessed, property involved, case, states "shall file sworn return mailing. Such constitute valid Ibid. aptly titled 743. 54 me allow lies much decision 3; reason, sentence-by-sentence analysis ante, 12-14, largely beside point. ordinary govern SAA. excepted service-of-process placed separate altogether. greater significance rules, but, importantly, regardless "principles 55 convinced SAA's still majority clearly At best, ambiguous point, breadth ambiguity always resolved favor Government. Williams, 514 ___, (1995) (slip op., 4). consistently reaffirmed traditional principle enlarge[d] language requires." Nordic Village, 503 (1992) internal quotation marks omitted). 318 (1986). least plausible interpret enough justify construing favor. 37. 56 necessarily follows Sovereign nature jurisdictional, FDIC Meyer, 510 471, 475 (1994), "`consent define suit.'" (quoting S., 586). Though previously with" 2072(b), expressly right," ibid. Allowing claims infringes thereby alters direct contravention Moreover, courts." Given allowing violates 82. 57 mean imply automatically prerequisites defendant; not. certainly impose require prerequisite invoking maintaining demonstrate exercised SAA, "nothing applicable [against Government] maintenance consented." 589.26 58 rejects proposition, accepted four five Courts addressed issue, immunity.27 be, concludes, `substantive' `jurisdictional,'" instead "`procedural' cast" "deal[s] processing." Ante, 14. inquiry "substantive," even Honda, 501. scope sufficient attached. instance, satisfy bar functions defines limits hear 7); Block, 287; Kubrick, 444 111, 117-118 Soriano 352 270, 271, 273 (1957). Wright, E. Cooper, 3654, 194-199 (1985).28 true requirement. While understood kind," conditioned transform ordinarily one.29 59 concludes operation displaces appear flow naturally. case. concedes, "technically inapplicable" promulgated Congress, Pub. 97-462, 2528, nullifies 60 inapplicability 14-15, nonetheless, (citing 2072(b)). entirely find implied repeal independent ("[A] prescribes"). statement pertains equally am reluctant assume, absent clearer indication, Court's reliance us rewrite situation generate outcome desire. Regardless rubric actually decided, reaches conclusion. rest requires similar differ. This, combination displace repeal. 61 remaining did. Although undertaken used term "connotes immediate, delay, prompt, dispatch." Amella 732 711, 713 1984) Black's Law Dictionary 588 (5th 1979)). Dickerman Northern Trust 176 181, 192-193 (1900). Whatever problems 148-day delay hardly described most definition term. syllabus constitutes prepared Reporter Decisions convenience reader. Detroit Lumber 200 321, 337. 1112, 781 seq. maintains, falls exclusive arose employment Maritime Administration vessel. 45, 1291(a) (1988 ed.)). apparently contest assertion. both Acts way. 782 (suits accordance provisions" Act). created suffices limitations. West Conrail, 481 35, (1987). federal-court state-created right, run, state state-court Walker Armco Steel Corp., 446 740, 752-753 (1980) (reaffirming Ragan Merchants Transfer Warehouse 337 530 (1949)). Hanna Plumer, 380 460 (1965) (method distinguished rights). substance retained 4(d)(4), time, instructed [be sent] Washington, Columbia." currently 4(i)(1)(B). then provided cause. 4(m), permits 654. event, timely. "agree[d] forthwith," 1065, instant position count 577. held, officers-the General-and "completing [through Attorney] forthwith." Id., 576. Compare, e.g., 819-821 1988); 1231 1981); Battaglia 303 683, 685-686 (CA2), dism'd, 371 907 (1962), 1985). Kenyon, 2d, 1231-1232 concurring); Battaglia, 686-687 (Friendly, concurring). Currently, 4(m) 5. "Time Service," "If own initiative plaintiff, time; shows failure, (Emphasis added.) Specifically, second decree include judgment, rate per centum annum satisfied, higher stipulated contract based." striving fidelity wrote, inexplicably writes off words "largely point," 3. Judge Henry Friendly trenchantly observed: "I meant [to render `jurisdictional' every step outlined Act]; supposed basic sue [Section(s) 742], content decide lapses `if operated.'" 686 otherwise, reluctantly concurred "Draconian conclusion" 4-month pleadings called despite Attorney. 4(i)(B)(3) ("court General"). 4(a), (b), (c), (l). 4(e)-(j). 4(i); formerly, 4(d)(4). 4; (noting specifies States," commenting supersedes, "registered Rule-4(i)-further facilitates permitting designate clerical employees receive mail. 4(i)(A). aim rulemakers, start, provide "`a comprehensive States,'" 19-20, Adoption 641), tenders distinction "method" "timing" 18. Current 4(i)(3) suggested separation "time" "manner" context credible. That addressing relation "manner," instructs: curing Boochever, Friendly, 13, precedent, ranked immunity," 1231. cogently take "if freed bounds stare decisis": "Section integral mere statute's enactment, effectuate Rules." (concurring opinion). Curiously, Ninth Circuit, pointed remedy litigants situation: Amend 745) steps, gain benefit original date through "relation back" 15(c). Ashland Ling-Temco-Vought, 711 1431, 1435-1437 1983) (allowing back amended assert Act); fresh anytime (the expired), avoiding loss claim). I.e., 3522, 78 1984); Restatement (Second) Judgments 11, 108 (1982) (defining "subject jurisdiction" "authority court] type involved action"). relationships "jurisdiction persons," Conflict Laws 27-32, 35-44, 47-52 (1971 Supp. 1989). 584 (1941) (Tucker parties). (Bankruptcy Code 106(c) waive bankruptcy trustee's monetary relief claims). 323 (Government's damages respect See, 7) (1995); 484 (1967) (Trading Enemy 34(f) 60-day claim-filing limitation; applied equitable tolling preserve petitioners' limitation). Mullane Central Hanover Bank 339 306, (1950) (to qualify adequate, "apprise interested objections"). Von Mehren Trautman, Jurisdiction Adjudicate: Suggested Analysis, 79 Harv. 1121, 1134 (1966) (recognizing bases adjudicatory jurisdiction); 1063, 225 (same). (1941), possibility liberal breach specifically bring Notwithstanding parties, explained "[t]he [was] marked sued," issues adjudicated claimant Government." 591. 1062 (CA5), (1994); 818 683 (1962). Only gone 62 Irwin Department Veterans Affairs, 498 89, 95-96 (1990), presumptively tolling, construed." 94. mark departure earlier, stricter, treatment (1995), Irwin. Williams confirmed "narrow[s] id., 7), cited proposition Dalm, 494 596 tax refund recognize reading forthwith. seem odd modern perspective, sensible textual regard generally. free amend determines fallen practices.

Category: 8