Document: 425 U.S. 457 96 S.Ct. 1630 48 L.Ed.2d 88 NEW YORK CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION et al.v.Marie SNEAD. No. 75-805. April 26, 1976. Rehearing Denied June 14, See 426 942, 2664. PER CURIAM. 1 A three-judge District Court was convened in response to appellee's complaint alleging that N.Y. Civil Service Law § 72 (1969), governing leave of absence for mentally unfit civil service employees, denied her the procedural due process guaranteed by Fourteenth Amendment United States Constitution. Joined as defendants action, which sought both declaratory and injunctive relief, were appellants Commission State New York its members, city York. 2 The sustained federal constitutional claims, enjoined from taking any action under challenged statutory provision, also ordered appellee be reinstated position given backpay has not appealed judgments. 3 Appellee, addition previously described allegations, asserted suspending Had followed procedures set forth 72. She particularly alleged doctor who examined had been selected manner prescribed statute. Appellants have this allegation and, indeed, now acknowledge at state law followed. record therefore establishes procedure applied her. It follows she may a claim against York; indeed based on guarantees reason In fact Since appealed, we no occasion consider aspect it, other than say neither claims just would authorize convening 28 U.S.C. 2281. Phillips v. States, 312 246, 253, 61 480, 484, 85 L.Ed. 800, 806 (1941). 4 "In so far it is assessments are void because unauthorized Arizona statute, injunction obviously upon ground unconstitutionality statute tested Constitution." Ex parte Bransford, 310 354, 358, 60 947, 950, 84 1249, 1251 (1940). 5 Stripped these related contentions, appellant amounts request determination constitutionality which, while administered never properly or makes clear standing assert such challenge, should dismissed. Hagans Lavine, 415 528, 94 1372, 39 577 (1974). 6 Appellee members claim. On their appeal, therefore, judgment them vacated, case remanded with instructions dismiss insofar relief agast them. 7 So ordered. 8 Mr. Justice BRENNAN, WHITE, MARSHALL, BLACKMUN affirm without hearing oral argument.

Category: 8