Document: 501 U.S. 868 111 S.Ct. 2631 115 L.Ed.2d 764 Thomas FREYTAG, et al., Petitionersv.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 90-762. Argued April 23, 1991. Decided June 27, Syllabus The chief judge of the United States Tax Court, an Article I court composed 19 judges appointed by President, is authorized to appoint special trial judges, 26 U.S.C. § 7443A(a), and assign them certain specified proceedings, §§ 7443A(b)(1), (2), (3), "any other proceeding which may designate," 7443A(b)(4). As subsection (b)(4) hear case prepare proposed findings opinion, but actual decision rendered a Court judge, 7443A(c). When petitioners sought review in determinations approximately $1.5 billion federal income tax deficiencies, their cases were assigned later reassigned, with petitioners' consent, judge. His unfavorable opinion was adopted as Court. Appeals affirmed, rejecting arguments that assignment complex not 7443A such violated Appointments Clause Constitution, which, inter alia, limits congressional discretion vest appointment "inferior Officers" Heads Departments, Courts Law. Held: 1. Subsection authorizes any proceeding, regardless complexity or amount controversy, for hearing preparation written opinion. Its plain language contains no limiting term restricting its reach are minor, simple, narrow; neither statute's structure nor legislative history contradicts broad sweep this language. Pp. 873-877. 2. Section does transgress separation powers embodied Clause. 877-892. (a) This one those rare should exercise challenge. That challenge goes validity basis litigation and, thus, nonjurisdictional structural constitutional objection be considered, even though consented assignment. See Glidden Co. v. Zdanok, 370 530, 535-536, 82 1459, 1464-1465, 8 671. 878-880. (b) A Officer" whose must conform Such acts inferior officer who exercises independent authority governed (b)(1), (3). fact subjection he performs duties performed employee subject transform his status. 880-882. (c) reflects Framers' conclusion widely distributed power subverts democratic government. Thus, can vested Court's only if falls within three repositories specifies. Clearly Congress did intend grant President judges. And "Department" refers executive divisions like Cabinet-level departments. Germaine, 99 508, 510-511, 25 L.Ed. 482. Treating would defy purpose Clause, meaning Constitution's text, clear intent from agency into court. 882-888. (d) An court, judicial power, "Court Law," reference "Courts Law" cannot limited III courts merely because they Constitution mentions. has wide task adjudication tribunals, see, e.g., American Ins. Canter, (1 Pet.) 511, 546, 7 242, Law." Buckley Valeo, 424 1, 96 612, 46 659, distinguished. To hold otherwise also undermine Congress' understanding given appoint. See, In re Hennen, 38 (13 230, 10 138. 888-890. (e) Clause's meaning. It exclusion function; function role closely resemble district courts; it Executive Legislative Branches, decisions appealable same manner courts. 890-892. 904 F.2d 1011 (CA5 1990), affirmed. BLACKMUN, J., delivered unanimous respect Parts I, II, III, Part IV, REHNQUIST, C.J., WHITE, MARSHALL, STEVENS, JJ., joined. SCALIA, filed concurring part judgment, O'CONNOR, KENNEDY, SOUTER, Kathleen M. Sullivan, petitioners. John G. Roberts, Jr., respondent. Justice BLACKMUN 1 leading Framers our viewed principle central guarantee just James Madison put way: "No political truth certainly greater intrinsic value stamped more enlightened patrons liberty." Federalist 47, p. 324 (J. Cooke ed. 1961). litigation, we decide whether granted transgresses separated powers. We answer inquiry negative. 2 * By Reform Act 1969, 951, 83 Stat. 730, 7441, "established, under article States, record known Court." empowered commissioners assist 958, 734. 1984, 464(a), 98 824, title "commissioner" changed "special judge." 463(a) Act, 1556(a) 1986, 100 2754, these specifically described proceedings designate." 7443A(a) (b). presently consists 15-year terms advice consent Senate. 7443(a), (b), (e). II 3 began deficiencies against several petitioners, had deducted on returns losses allegedly realized shelter scheme.1 March 1982, Judge Richard C. Wilbur. Trial 1984. Wilbur became ill November 1985, Special Carleton D. Powell preside over evidentiary referee, videotaped. App. Wilbur's illness forced retirement assumption senior status effective Brief Petitioners 8; Tr. Oral Arg. 10, 8, 12-14. concluded scheme consisted sham transactions owed additional taxes. Powell's 89 T.C. 849 (1987).2 4 took appeal Fifth Circuit. (1990). argue Appeals, do here, legitimate body. Rather, contended theirs 7443A, Art. 2, cl. ruled question judge's "in essence, attack upon matter jurisdiction raised first time appeal." F.2d, at 1015 (footnote omitted). then went reject claims merits. Code waived consenting before Powell. Id., 1015, n. 9. 5 certiorari, --- ----, 781, 112 844 (1991), resolve important questions raises about 6 7443A(b) Internal Revenue four categories judges: "(1) declaratory judgment proceeding," "(2) section 7463," "(3) proceeding" deficiency claimed overpayment exceed $10,000, "(4) categories, report it. fourth category, authorize regular exceeded bounds statutory conferred Despite what concede "sweeping language" (b)(4), 6, claim intended comparatively narrow minor matters covered subsections 7443A(b)(4) surely find statute unambiguous, complete except exceptional circumstances. Demarest Manspeaker, 599, 603, 608 (1991). could clear. states short "mak[ing] decision." subsection's text restricts narrow, urge. have stated "are liberty create exception where declined so." Hallstrom Tillamook County, 493 20, ---, 110 304, 309, 107 237 (1989). 9 Nothing (b)(4)'s proposing Committee Ways Means "to clarify" "so long enter H.R.Rep. 98-432, pt. 1568 (1984), U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News pp. 697, 1198. Report explain: "A technical change made allow Chief write opinions, final issue. However, will latter category cases." Ibid. 11 Conference "follows House Bill," H.R.Conf.Rep. 98-861, 1127 1815, Report, indicates knowingly removed jurisdictional requirement maximum dispute order expand (b)(4). 12 appear appreciate distinction between judges' opinions lack actually cases, reserved exclusively Court.3 Because distinguish deciding it, advance two that, seems us, miss mark. 13 notes amendment now "technical" read transfer dispositive correct 1984 transferred decisional altered substantive set forth scope however, little, any, relevance decide. 14 Since enactment 1943, 503, 58 72, possessed particular cases. predecessors, commissioners, been almost half century practice, often heard reported large Accordingly, when codified report. light historical development role; nature amendment, alter wide-ranging effect text's 15 phrase general fill unintended gaps left sections Reading catch-all provision, involving small money interpretation render limitations imposed (3) nullity. support argument, rely Gomez 490 858, 109 2237, 104 923 16 held Federal Magistrates Act's allowing magistrates "be inconsistent laws States," 28 636(b)(3), permit magistrate supervise juror voir dire felony defendant's objection. so holding, explained: 17 "When creates office assigns specific duties, outline attributes office. Any pursuant authorization reasonably bear some relation duties." U.S., 864, S.Ct., 2241. 18 list enumerated followed provided outlines grant. Unlike explicitly distinguishes $10,000 less, found lesser exercised prevents serving preceding subsections. limited-amount If hear, decide, kind subsections, superfluous. Our consistently expressed "a deep reluctance interpret provision superfluous provisions enactment." Pennsylvania Public Welfare Dept. Davenport, 2126, 2133, 588 Automobile Workers Johnson Controls, Inc., 1196, 1204, 113 158 than 20 conclude permits amount, language, structure, conclusion. IV 21 construction issue turn. submit case, violates According "Officer" compliance reads: 22 "He [the President] . shall nominate, Advice Consent Senate, Ambassadors, public Ministers Consuls, Judges Supreme all Officers herein for, established Law; Law Appointment Officers, think proper, alone, Law, Departments." 23 officers" sources: "the Officer," contend fall power. A. 24 address Government's argument right propriety 7443A. Commissioner contends failing raise timely roots separation-of-powers concept embedded political. jurisprudence generally focuses danger Branch's aggrandizing expense another Branch. Mistretta 488 361, 382, 647, 102 714 guards encroachment preserves aspect integrity preventing diffusion correctly gave past, consider below. Grosso 390 62, 71-72, 88 709, 715, 906 (1968); 671 (1962); Hormel Helvering, 312 552, 556-560, 61 719, 721-723, 85 1037 (1941). expressly included objections officers considered below: 27 "And Lamar 241 103, 117-118[, 36 535, 539-540, 60 912 (1916) ], intercircuit usurped presidential appointing here determined merits, despite District until filing supplemental brief second request review." Glidden, 536, 1465 (Harlan, announcing Court). Like faced frivolous disingenuous. alleged defect litigation. true matter, litigant issues trial. But disruption sound appellate process entailed entertaining below always overcome Harlan called strong interest judiciary maintaining plan powers." 29 reaching conclusion, note persuaded Commissioner's defer there prerogatives connection Commissioner, interests implicated Branch, expected look out itself. claimed, accordingly, need concerned protecting stake here. 30 approach. believe, error assumes Executive's own principles speak primarily simply located II. dispensing too freely; universe eligible recipients articulates principle, serve interests. For example, forbids granting inappropriate members Neither agree waive protection. "The assent bill contrary shield INS Chadha, 462 919, 942, 13, 103 2764, 2779, 77 317 (1983). protected Branch government entire Republic. B 31 turn preliminary States. disagree, employee, fails, "lesser functionaries" selected strict requirements 126, 162, 685, 659 (1976). 32 contrast argues aide responsible case. characterizes work, taking evidence preparing concludes, acting employees rather "Officers States." 33 "[A]ny appointee exercising significant 'Officer States,' must, therefore, prescribed [Art. II]." Buckley, 685. addressed Officers." First Western Govt. Securities, Inc. 94 549, 557-559 (1990), Second Circuit Samuels, Kramer 930 975, 985 agreed. Both degree "significant" classifications employees. Cf. Go-Bart Importing 282 344, 352-353, 51 153, 156-157, 75 374 (1931) (United officers). 34 reasons deemed decision. ignores significance possess. "established salary, means statute. Burnap 252 512, 516-517, 40 374, 376-377, 64 692 (1920); 511-512, 482 (1879). These characteristics masters, hired temporary, episodic basis, positions law, functions delineated Furthermore, perform ministerial tasks. They take testimony, conduct trials, rule admissibility evidence, enforce discovery orders. course carrying functions, discretion. 35 Even be, unchanged. Under (c), concedes act authority. urges extensive wielded standing assert rights taxpayers us beside point. purposes mere responsibilities. occasion Constitution. properly appointed. C 37 Having Officers," relevant bears repeating: "[T]he clearly overlooked. involve "interbranch" appointment. Morrison Olson, 487 654, 675-677, 108 2597, 2610-2612, 101 569 (1988). However might classify nothing incongruous giving him clerk assistant id., 676, 2611. in, Department Commerce State. obviously appropriate burden persuading indeed heavy. Although heavy burden, serious one. offices provide method offices, "Congress' inevitably bounded express unless provides comports latter, holders 'Officers States.' " 138-139, 691-692 (discussing Necessary Proper Clause). 39 "manipulation official appointments" revolutionary generation's greatest grievances see Wood, Creation Republic 1776-1787, 79 (1969) (Wood), offices" most insidious powerful weapon eighteenth despotism." 143. Those framed concerns carefully husbanding limit diffusion. debate brief, sparse determination distribution Constitutional Convention rejected Madison's complaint "not go far enough necessary all": argued "Superior Departments ought offices." Records 1787, 627-628 (M. Farrand rev. 1966). understood, ensure accountable force people. bespeaks limitation dividing principal officers—Ambassadors, Ministers, Judges—between Branches. 129-131, 687-688. officers," allows devolve With concern mind, repeat challenge: Can constitutionally appoint? names possible beyond therefore possibilities. First, urges, treated department head. Second, Amicus suggests, Third, Should follow 41 argument. 45 years designated "court record" body (the predecessor Board Appeals) 7441 remove different duties. 42 "readily" acknowledges fit perfect one." Respondent 41. Branches best home. reasoning summarized follows: (1) Branches; (2) either Judicial Branch; (4) every component department. 43 accept head receive distributing actors whom Given inexorable presence administrative state, holding organ multiply indefinitely number recognized dangers posed excessively diffuse efforts 79-80. So we. qualify "Head Department," demonstrate 44 persuaded. 'a division government, State, Treasury,' "creat[ed]" "giv[en] name department" Congress. 510-511. Burnap, 515, 376 ("The Secretary charge great branch Government, Treasury, War, member Cabinet"). "Heads Departments" embrace bureau officers." 511. Confining departments constrains interpretation, contrast, easily identified. Their heads oversight share President's accountability ensures provisions. noted conjunction Opinion "may require Opinion, writing, Officer each Departments," Germaine "Executive Department" Cabinet members. 47 "executive departments" appears Twenty-fifth Amendment, empowers Vice together majority "principal departments," declare "unable discharge office." Const., Amdt. 25, 4. Amendment ratified February 1967, course, control prior Clause.4 Nevertheless, instructive hearings confirm "department" entities: 48 "[O]nly officials rank participate inability exists. Presidential appointees direct named [now 101], future, comprise Cabinet, determining inability." 203, 89th Cong., 1st Sess., (1965). 49 view threatened still treatment Congress, enacted legislation 1969 "making agency." S.Rep. 91-552, 303 (1969), 1645, 2027. "anomalous continue classify" agencies, 302, questioned "appropriate pre-1969 tribunal] sitting IRS]." 50 "Head" "Department." concluded, determine suggests. both position because, say, courts.5 52 "one Court" tribunals common-law jurisdiction. II's mentioned "nowhere makes 'legislative courts.' 543, 1469. fails nevertheless. illuminated cognate analytic contributed Petitioners, underestimate importance time-honored reading arising law tribunals. Pet. 242 (1828) defined courts); Williams 289 553, 565-567, 53 751, 754-755, 1372 (1933) (same). non-Article Canter Williams, similar literalistic advanced "judicial Power" III. explained power: 54 Claims undoubtedly remains—and vital question—whether 55 "That apart plainly apparent Marshall Insurance dealing territorial [T]he possess although virtue third Constitution." 565-566, 754-755. 56 Florida yet 57 Valeo While paraphrased "by departments, Judiciary," 132, 688, consist judiciary. Buckley. Instead, Elections Commissioners urged longstanding practice. "[F]rom earliest days Republic," Northern Pipeline Construction Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 50, 64, 2858, 2868, 73 598 (1982), creation clerks, officers. 138 (1839). consistent evinces 'traditional ways conducting give meaning' Constitution," Mistretta, 401, 669, quoting Youngstown Sheet Tube Sawyer, 343 579, 610, 72 863, 897, 1153 (1952) (concurring opinion), precluded being 59 examine define scheme. 563-567, 753-755. judicial, executive, legislative, apply disputes Government. resolving disputes, portion function. advocate rulemaker. adjudicative body, construes statutes passed regulations promulgated Service. make decisions. courts, indisputably much way theirs. punish contempts fine imprisonment, 7456(c); injunctive relief, 6213(a); Treasury refund 6512(b)(2); subpoena witnesses, production documents, administer oaths, 7456(a). All quintessentially nature. 62 remains President. Nor judgments regional ultimate moreover, extent civil actions tried without jury." 7482(a). standard contrasts applied rulemaking 10(e) Administrative Procedure 706(2)(A). Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n State Farm Mutual Auto 463 29, 43-44, 2856, 2866-2867, 443 63 multiple demands. Moreover, since early 1800s, regularly clerks who, least 1839, Pet., 258. Including among significantly 65 ordered. 66 SOUTER join, judgment. 67 involved join reach, well resolution of, 68 initial errs failed object after developed current "waived objection" 1011, asked parties following question: "Does party's constitute waiver 2?" 498 69 "no" adopting "structural" class forfeited, litigants entitled stage accepts rejects proposal—and indeed, mention dwell present claim, ante, fashion briefed, choosing instead say "exercise discretion" entertain petitioner's claim. Ante, 879. occurs forfeiture objection—or deficiency—the remain guidance may, disregarded. (The rare" ones ignored, ibid.—but forfeitures rights, arguably "rare," hardly useful guidance.) point briefed argued, having expended considering answer. my claims, entitlement review. party forfeits otherwise, quarrel proposition truly circumstances, forfeited assertion itself constitutes circumstance; circumstance Peretz ---- - 2661, 2677-2680, (1991) (SCALIA, dissenting). sweeping refuse presented here.1 70 procedural familiar criminal failure tribunal it." Yakus 321 414, 444, 660, 677, 834 (1944); Socony-Vacuum Oil 310 150, 238-239, 811, 851-852, 84 1129 (1940). Forfeiture2 technicality essential orderly administration justice." Wright Miller, Practice 2472, 455 (1971). system, rules governing Rules Criminal 52(b) Rule Civil 46. virtually identical 144. reflect "main event," "tryout road" Wainwright Sykes, 433 90, 97 2497, 2508, 594 (1977). very word "review" presupposes litigant's instance. abandon encourage practice "sandbagging": suggesting permitting, strategic reasons, pursue later—if outcome unfavorable—claiming reversible error. 71 blanket "argument[s] premised [are] personal waivable," erode cardinal administration. precedent policy. principle: Personal happen governmental laden (and hence inherently nonwaivable individual) many conceive of. free-speech Sixth "public," benefits society guarantees; foreclosed. Head New Mexico Examiners Optometry, 424, 432-433 12, 1759, 1764-1765 983 (1963) (First Amendment); Levine 362 619, 80 1038, 1044, 989 (1960) (Sixth Amendment). distinctively guarantees undervalue them. Many defendants, prefer press excluded. true, agreement intention disregard legitimating effect—i.e., lawful. to, themselves propose, tell no. involves ex ante post—its remedy: Must already aside losing object? There reason why so. sometimes so—not, structural, not, deprived requisite subject-matter party, noticed sua sponte points Fire Casualty Finn, 341 17-18, 534, 541-542, 95 702 (1951); Mansfield, L.M.R. Swan, 379, 510, (1884); Capron Van Noorden, Cranch 127, 229 (1804). deprives ignore opposed remedial effect, i.e., approving, unlawful action this, perpetual remediability defects, "nonwaivability" jurisdiction, demonstrated attacked collaterally—i.e., jurisdiction—on ground (structural not) ignored. Corp. Ireland, Ltd. Compagnie des Bauxites de Guinee, 456 694, 702, 9, 2099, 2164, 492 (1982). 74 precedent: place primary reliance Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n Schor, 478 833, 106 3245, 92 675 (1986). said "[w]hen issue" (referring 2) "notions dispositive." 851, 3257. Schor sort (a tribunal's exceeding jurisdiction) described, traditionally context extend defects quite natural, analytically required. Cf., Clapp 875 1396, 1399 (CA9 1989) ("While few discussing differences indicate resolved court"). analogy mind. "To case," said, cure difficulty confer 2." 850-851, 3256-3257.3 nonwaiver rule—a traditional application understandably extended tribunals—to call forum. forum issued Petitioners' (1962). explains, review, 879, affected claim—for improper regulation controversy. (that Harlan, joined Justices Brennan Stewart) relates basic protections designed benefit litigants." (emphasis added)). formulation advance, broader that. ("[A]n waivable." 43-44 added); "There hierarchy principles, fundamental while vindication others relegated vagaries individual strategies." 45.) important, Harlan's plurality stand never imposed, proposition, reiterates today, imposed. 76 Several recent flatly contradict waived. Surely so-called negative commerce clause structural. Dennis Higgins, 865, 870, 969 supposed waivability state according emanates themselves. Yet last Term, Jimmy Swaggart Ministries Equalization California, 378, 397, 796 commerce-clause procedurally barred result refund. G.D. Searle Cohn, 404, 1137, 1144, 250 remanded consideration "if added). (even ) routinely ordinary Doremus, 888 630, 633, (separation claims), cert. denied 752, 772 (1991); Opdyke Investment Detroit, 883 1265, 1276 (CA6 (same); Interface Group, Massachusetts Port Authority, 816 (CA1 1987) (Breyer, J.) (Supremacy claims). Finally, policy: rule—in others—is obvious. Without incentive legal soon available, lower-court juries frequently uselessly, difficult less informed complete. Besides inviting evils, categorical whole new concerning "structural"—a Sunstein, Government Control Information, Calif.L.Rev. 889, 915 (1986) (arguing structural). rigid cut grain side-effect distorting law. maxim volenti non injuria human affairs, requiring absolutely systematically disregarded incline ourselves towards finding protection 78 sufficient forfeiture—and (though discusses virtues length) pretend otherwise. reason, then, "exercise[s] discretion," forfeiture. whimsy. discussion gives all: "we disingenuous," describes situation regard vast appeal. decided day, extends "frivolous" "disingenuous" challenges, "[t]he defendants." Peretz, 2669. Here objects assignment, inclined, pressed today. "rare struggled objection, finds invalid. wrong full future system separate coequal provides: 81 clause, absent appointment, agree, provision. valid careful attention referred there. refer "Bodies Functions," "Courts" generally, generally. Certainly mean Rhode Island do). definite "the" narrows envisioned (in style Uniform Commercial Code) contain explicit cross-reference 888-889. doubt irrelevant. equally "constitute Tribunals supreme Court," "Tribunals below." Yet, "plainly 'inferior Courts' 1; relied establishment tribunals." 1469 (Opinion J.); J. Story, Commentaries 1573, 437 (1833). Today's evidently appreciate, did, "partake prolixity code," McCulloch Maryland, Wheat. 316, 407, 579 (1819). bristle supras, infras, footnotes. Instead insisting legalisms should, submit, mapped 124, 684, (1976) (per curiam ), "cognate provisions" feature: during good behavior undiminishable salary. supra, Mouat, 124 303, 307, 505, 506, (1888) ("courts justice") (dictum). contemplated national "According convention, behavior. ." 78, 465 (C. Rossiter 1961) (A. Hamilton) (second emphasis original). reasoning. Responding select group Congressmen "Department," said: 'Heads Departments,' used 'Courts Law,' suggests branch. absence include Departments' 86 six voting Commission, department, Judiciary voice selection." 686 87 passage understood (thereby excluding Congress) making bound disposition. fact, believe calculation forethought, faithfully implementing theory experience post-revolutionary self-government taught combining recipe corruption.4 foremost legislators expectancy occupying guarded Incompatibility Ineligibility Clauses, 684. real, obvious, remained. themselves, inclined friends supporters. proclivity unchecked multimember body—as Wilson pointed criticism Executive: 90 "[A]re impartiality discernment likely predominate numerous [appointing] body? proportion number, friends, favorites dependents. filled. person nearly connected, foregoing ties, [is] vote filling candidate. Every member, gives, account, friend, expect return favor convenient opportunity. manner, reciprocal intercourse partiality, interestedness, favoritism, perhaps venality, established; instance, practicability tracing poison source. Ignorant, vicious, prostituted characters introduced office; those, voted, procured them, loudest expressing astonishment, door admission ever opened men infamous description. suffering people thus wounded buffeted, Homer's Ajax, dark; melancholy satisfaction knowing blows given." Works 359-360 Andrews 1896). 91 Essex Result, Memoir Theophilus Parsons 381-382 (1859); 76, 455-457 Hamilton). unaccountable legislatures introduce unnecessary friends. observed: Legislature departs Theory requires One securities tyrannical authors one, influence execution other." Observations Jefferson's Draft Virginia, reprinted Papers Jefferson 308, 311 Boyd 1952). 93 knew, writing "After discriminating theory, classes judiciary, next [was] practical security each, invasion others." 48, 308 Madison). Invasion legislature, threat, "legislative possesses operating motives departments." 49, 314 "mask complicated indirect measures, encroachments co-ordinate Madison) nominal (e.g., appointments) branches. T. Jefferson, Notes Virginia 120 (W. Peden 1955). repose execute (or appoint) President; resist various, including constituency, alone responsible, veto encroaching laws, 7, unconstitutional. Easterbrook, Review, Case W.Res.L.Rev. 905, 920-924 obvious necessary, permanent nugatory. discretionary salary emoluments Magistrate, obsequious proper him." 73, 441 51, Madison); Mass. Chapter XIII (1780). lodged surrounded fortifications independently, manipulations degree, Departments. individuals reputational quality appoint; able encroachment, directly answerable constituency appointments motive assure faithful lieutenants. paper endowment encroachment—foremost life tenure (during "good behavior") accoutrements fearless controversies, Nos. Hamilton); 57-60, 2864-2866, (1982) Brennan, potential repository free (as Presidential) influence. depositing fortified lieutenants legislature reposing deposit courts," personnel utterly destroys constructed produces result, remind reader, spite odds, confronted problem are. concludes court—even feat, begins Power States"—not "Some "Most States"—"shall ordain establish." unequivocal sets startling III." 889. turns out, however—to suppose said—that really pun. power," uses resemblance art with, adjudicate courts." used, proceed explain, covers infinite variety sense), characteristic cause meant tell, thing approach Law"—which exercise. unremarkable "Congress [has] subdivisions 1924 created predecessor, Appeals—or venerable 1791 Comptroller "decide[d] appeal, further Secretary, settlement accounts." Casper, Essay Separation Powers: Some Early Versions Practices, Wm. Mary L.Rev. 211, 238 (1989); 66. board, are, words Great Justice, "incapable receiving power]"—unless (Marshall, C.J.). bodies "adjudicate," facts, arrive "inherently judicial" "adjudication." conditions ago. auditing accounts receiver moneys enlarged sense, act, admitted. performance existence facts sense calling militia 1795, 19, commissioner certificate extradition criminal, treaty, judicial. bring fact." Murray's Lessee Hoboken Land Improvement How. 272, 280, 372 (1856). Accord, Bator, Architecture: Ind.L.J. 233, 264-265 Patent Board, Henry Knox, Edmund Randolph capacities Attorney General, respectively, 109, (1790), adjudicated patentability inventions, J.Pat.Off.Soc. 68-69 (July 1936). "Success" Power, 277, 280 Today, corps numbering 1,000, (APA), 554, 3105. "Adjudication," words, "inherently" promulgation Standard Jersey 221 502, 619 (1911); APA, 553 ("Rule making"). commit sorts adjudicators handle courts—just committed adjudicators. "[T]here matters, form capable susceptible determination, cognizance deem proper." Lessee, 284. Ex parte Bakelite Corp., 279 438, 451, 411, 413, 789 (1929). could, denials Social Security benefits. establish Court—composed 5-year terms—within Administration. former short, adjudicatory officer, identity officer—not something mode decisionmaking type tells exercised. "[O]ur [that] function, chameleon, assigned." Bowsher Synar, 714, 749, 3181, 3199, 583 (STEVENS, judgment). 953, 16, 2785, Where decisionmakers power." Randolph, F.Cas. (No. 11,558) 254 (CC Va. 1833) indistinguishable hypothetical reviews Service) owed—a classic thing, H. Dubroff, 47-175 (1979), suggested opposite: 105 opportunity base petition decided." Old Colony Trust 716, 725, 499, 918 (1929) (Taft, Though renamed States" 1942, remained "an Branch," 1100 (1952 ed.), continued agency, considers "quintessentially judicial," 891. administered subpoenaed examined 1114 ed.); reviewed jury," 1141(a) ed.). treat akin Communications Commission (FCC) National Labor Relations Board. Dobson 320 489, 495-501, 239, 243-247, 248 (1943). statutorily denominated "Article magically acquire tenure; salaries diminished; removable "inefficiency, neglect duty, malfeasance 7443(f). (In 729, 3189, (1986), "very broad" "could sustain removal perceived transgressions.") How anyone "independent Branch[ ]" mystery. me entirely Service, FCC, Amar, Marbury, Original Jurisdiction U.Chi.L.Rev. 443, Pipeline, 113, 2893 (WHITE, dissenting) (equating agencies 992-993 (CA2 1991) (collecting academic authorities proposition). seeking power" sense—in power—can someone relies heavily 889-891. us.5 power—but governors executives executives. "These Courts, deposited. incapable sovereignty exists enables needful regulations, respecting territory belonging legislating combined general, government." C.J.) Or it: "[Territories] organized organic law; creations, exclusively, supervision control." Benner Porter, 235, 119 (1850). endow governments plural executive; legislate; dispense altogether. entity, administers nation. 75-76, 2874 "longstanding practice" permitting 890. am unaware Perhaps discussed, discuss below, (such Court) judge—not provision; certain, ours approved (1839), cites, tribunal. void. is. 114 suffice If, subdivision Treasury—as be—it qualify. free-standing, self-contained entity (and, save impeachment, else). holds Department. originally thought theory—wrong, coherent—that dictum 375, (1920), Cabinet," 886 observation identified," 886; 25th 'department' entities," 887. Elsewhere, seemingly disclaims criterion, 887, 4, says Unfortunately, specifies causes "like department," intelligible clues quotes committee equates inclusion definition 101, 887 (quoting (1965)), hint cancelled footnote "Cabinet-like" character, whatever is, "strictly limit[ed]" approving quotation Burnap's branch" invite guess numerosity key—but Education fewer 5,000 employees, willing "great division," ibid., 1,800. Employment Trends March, 1991, Office Personnel Management, Table reserves "Departments" above others, farthest status, earlier thinks "subject shar[ing] people," 886—namely, regulatory Trade Securities Exchange Indeed, lest conceivable improbability excluded, headed States—the Reserve Bank St. Louis, none manners permitted officers, Directors two-thirds elected banks, 304 341. impossible respond random argumentation derive comprehensible address, point, trace flesh-and-blood subsists: "Cabinet-level 116 position. "Cabinet" Founders proposals Cabinet-like entity. Learned, 74-94 (1912); E. Corwin, 97, 238-240 (5th 1984). membership, (except speaks them), (1879), Pensions, Interior Department, And, Bureau Buildings Grounds, War 117 misplaced. Cabinet. composition phrase, single "departments" gross, Opinions Clause) Heads" (not Heads") "of 118 militates 1792 "Act Post-Office Post Roads creating Postmaster General empowering assistant, deputy postmasters, places necessary." 3, 234. Washington cabinet. 233-249. Assistant Deputy Postmasters officers—which understand silly cabinet how made. Modern original refutes non-Cabinet agencies. Agencies time. 155(f) (FCC—Managing Director); 78d(b) (Securities "such necessary"); (Federal Commission—Secretary); 4a(c) (Commodity Commission—General Counsel). know casts authorizations factors includes immediately organizational context, me, establishments. presumably, ability get matters. operations Central Intelligence Agency, Director 121 evident meaning—that establishments—is 2's sharp seen, appointable (unless does, Senate." sure business conducted Senate approval; "inferior," subordinate, fashion. (sub-Presidential) superiors; superiors be. all, himself (assuming cross-Department permissible) appointees. implausible disposition, particularly make-up mentioned. Environmental Protection example—which include, chiefs, counsel judges—must Something Else. 122 decision, policy, meaning, apparently doing decades complaint. dictionary roughly contemporaneous adoption provided, "[a] allotment business; distinct province, allotted person. N. Webster, Dictionary (1828). readily acknowledge applying seemed strange Founders, continues seem modern ears. envision size specialized created. chose connote (much status), organization—a connotation endures colloquial usage today ("that department"). clear, think, chain envisions: subordinates. subsist, however alter. 123 confess establishments (notably, agencies" Commission) insure high insulation elaborated consequence Humphrey's Executor 295 602, 869, 1611 (1935), restriction arbitrary dismissal avowedly him, Depending broadly reads dismiss "for cause," agencies; publicly regarded control—a "headless Fourth Branch"—he care appointments. raison d'etre appointive 903-908, exist they, shored up resistant pressures. reasonable position—though tend adjusting remainder compensate fruitless endeavor. event supports today—both artificially defines resistent pressures, unrelated distinctions successively embraces. Agency components "independent" independence control.) sum, effects innovations approved, 125 concur At oral "This implications 3,000 longest trials court's history—14 weeks financial 9,000 pages transcripts, 3,000-plus exhibits." 3. Counsel position: "In succinctly, large, complex, multiparty, multimillion dollar cases—alleged one—Congress autonomous 17. October 21, 1987; day reassigning 15; 8-9. appendix, Reports. observed "sometime months court." 11. event, chronology significant. duty work disclosing devoted task. aware magnitude proof inference drawn factor rests assume "rubber stamp" activity deferential 183 factual effectively 7443A(c), bind strictly Energy Regulatory Louis. Circuit, advocated Appellee 47-51. abandoned 975 1991), 34-48. merits Appeals. Bankshares, Sandberg, 2749, 2761, "waive" "forfeit," same, interchangeably late precision. Waiver, "intentional relinquishment abandonment privilege," Zerbst, 458, 464, 1019, 1023, 1461 (1938), occur. waiver, (right trial); Bascaro, 742 1335, 1365 (CA11 1984) double jeopardy), sub nom. Hobson 472 1017, 3476, 613 (1985); Whitten, 706 1000, 1018, 1983) confront adverse witnesses), denied, 1100, 1593, Johnson, counsel); Patton 281 276, 312, 253, 263, 854 (1930) jury). (at proceeding), converse true. role. analysis concerned, inadvertent involved—that try retain throughout sources using Ironically enough, "no-waiver" propose destroy parallelism achieve. use unauthorized examiner Act) justify reversal itself: "[W]e examiner's irregularity invalidate resulting overruled hearings. nullity." L.A. Tucker Truck Lines, 344 33, 38, 67, 69, (1952). check despotism. 883-884. 129, 687, (1976), fact. quotations describe abuses unelected royal Crown, offices. drafters Constitutions reacted lodging legislature. Const. (1776) (legislature appoints judges); cf. Articles Confederation, IX (Congress land forces). Americans learned, representative republic magistracy enterprising ambition [legislative] indulge jealousy exhaust precautions." 309 Soon revolution, constitutions assemblies become source faction states." Republic, 407 (1969). 1780, reacting Executive. (1780); N.H. (1784) (Officers Council). On despotism, 403-409. lead Constitutions. intentionally self-evidently, Sadly, dicta (1933), inspire confidence, prompt emulation. includes, notion 580-581, 760, also, Currie, 145-146 (1982)—which declared "intellectual disaster" commentators. P. Meltzer, Miskin, Shapiro, Hart Wechsler's System, 468 (3d 1988); 242-243, (1990) ("I devote lecture ] erroneous").

Category: 12