cindermond/bento huggingface dataset:
1. [Pacino's] turn as a low-level mobster is his most relaxed and charming work in years.
2. Tarnishes the shiny veneer of the mob we've seen in earlier movies, holding up its players not as criminal heroes but as cogs in a criminal machine, more worthy of compassion than cheers.
3. In the tired figure of Lefty, manifest in the craggy icon of Pacino, our sympathies are definitely enlisted, and the theme rings a poignant note.
4. The humor and tragedy that Pacino and Depp put on the screen will stay with you.
5. It's a good story and an interesting take on trust and friendship, but Donnie Brasco only works for the first hour.
6. For all its treacheries, twists and turns, nothing really comes as a surprise.
7. Remains a bore for much of its running time.
8. Pacino's performance is great and the story seems to have an interesting take on human nature, but the bland, mechanical direction make it not quite worthy of a full recommendation.
9. Donnie Brasco is 120 minutes of riveting filmmaking.
10. In almost every respect, Donnie Brasco is an original, the unexpected rebirth of an old and oft-told tale.
What is the consensus?

A stark, nuanced portrait of life in organized crime, bolstered by strong performances from Al Pacino and Johnny Depp.
1. It confirms Fincher's status as a film maker who artfully bends technical know-how to the service of psychological insight.
2. Director David Fincher and writer David Koepp can't sustain it.
3. It's a pleasurable revelation to see Foster feel out a role, both emotively and physically, with the well-marshaled gusto that she does here.
4. OK, so we never have much doubt about what will happen, but Fincher pulls out all the visual stops to crank up the heat in this tale of five people in a Manhattan house on one dark and stormy night.
5. ...a skillful special effects thriller with shockingly modest aspirations...
6. For an average filmmaker, this might be a nice addition to a résumé but for Fincher, this is a disappointment.
7. An uneven mainstreaming of Hitchcock and De Palma, Panic Room's thrills are in the right place, but it lacks a damaging psychic impact.
8. From the bravura title sequence ... to tracking shots of the criminals casing their target, Fincher is able to expand artistically while shackled to a claustrophobic setting.
9. Propelled by an excellent cast of five, the film has the look and feel of a classic genre film, with the two female victims trapped in a room, the three male attackers in control, and the motive simply greed.
10. Hugely enjoyable thriller by David Fincher, with Foster back on top form -- stylish, thrilling and nail-bitingly suspenseful, this is top quality stuff...

What is a brief summary of the following reviews?

Elevated by Fincher's directorial talent and Foster's performance, Panic Room is a well-crafted, above-average thriller.
1. It's nice to see a film set in the modern world that lets its combatants punch each other in the skull.
2. Who needs a budget when you can do what Tony Jaa can do?
3. Either you find the goofball, low-tech spirit of the piece entertaining and easygoing or you don't. Either way, Tony Jaa is a force to be reckoned with.
4. Viewers who like refreshingly uncluttered actioners will find reward in 'Ong-Bak.'
5. The film's middle stretch is an unmistakable tour de brute force.
6. What's really going on here is a showcase for 28-year-old Tony Jaa, a martial arts sensation who's hoping to bring attention to the art of Muay Thai
7. In a genre, even in Asia, that's become overwhelmed by digital f/x, there's a real joy in seeing the back-to-basics action that Ong-Bak promotes.
8. Its plot is pretty much standard-issue. But the action is spectacular enough to allow the audience to overlook that problem.
9. Get a load of this guy, the way he leaps over cars, slides under SUVs. Experience the man bringing the pain and unleashing wrath. Gaze with wide eyes at his jackhammer fists.
10. It's too soon to tell if Tony Jaa has the the ability to sustain an interesting career, but he's off to a hell of a start, regardless.

Write a one sentence summary of the reviews above.

While Ong-Bak: The Thai Warrior may be no great shakes as a movie, critics are hailing the emergence of a new star in Tony Jaa, whose athletic performance is drawing comparisons with Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan, and Jet Li.
1. This isn't anywhere strong enough to make you forget the Hunger Games series.
2. Won't win any awards for originality, but it carries the familiar adventure along efficiently, generating sufficient excitement to keep one from dreading the next chapter.
3. It's exhausting, yet emotionally unengaging.
4. None of these characters receives enough screen time to develop relationships with us or each other.
5. This middle chapter cannot quite escape the feeling that it is pre-finale filler.
6. Action overflows, some of it neatly staged but none of it telling us anything beyond "Go! Go! Go! Run! Run! Run!" Stay home, stay home.
7. This is supremely silly stuff, and overall a much lesser version of teens versus the titans of post-apocalypse industry -- a copy of a copy of a copy.
8. The young leads lack charisma, and the veteran supporting players seem to be phoning it in.
9. After an hour and a half of mechanical 10-minute action cycles that start with, "Maybe we're safe now, for the moment," and end with "Aaaah! Run!" the pattern gets as wearying as the level of emotional brutality.
10. The material may be cardboard, but the actors do what they can.

What is a brief summary of the following reviews?

Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials is an action-packed sequel at the cost of story, urgency, and mystery that the original offered.
Write a one sentence review of the movie "the gameplan".

Despite The Rock's abundant charisma, The Game Plan is just another run-of-the-mill Disney comedy.
1. A sharp parody worthy of MAD Magazine. [It] runs through every tired showbiz biopic plot point with a shiny new skewer.
2. So is it a satire or a spoof?
3. It's not pee in your pants funny, but it does have it's moments and for the most part it works.
4. If only for the music numbers, this movie deserves a standing ovation. Much of the credit goes to John C. Reilly, an actor with a rubbery face and the voice of an angel.
5. Tone is crucial here, and Kasdan and Apatow manage a good balance, delivering silly and often crude comedy combined with sincere performances and a sense of smart craft.
6. The result is a film that has a few winning and entertaining moments, but ultimately feels like a Will Ferrell comedy and/or a 'Saturday Night Live' skit that managed to grow out of control
7. At very best, someone will recognize the good work here by the star of the show, John C. Reilly... What's taking so long? Give the man an award already!
8. This gleeful skewering of American popular music works because of the talents of director Jake Kasdan and a cast led by John C. Reilly.
9. It may be utter nonsense from start to finish but at a time when your moviegoing choices are limited to deeply serious Oscar bait and silly family froth, its appearance comes as a raunchy relief.
10. Very funny when focused on being a parody, but goes for the cheap laughs and shock jokes too often
What is the consensus?

A parody that pokes fun at rock stars and reductive biopics alike, this comedy sings in large part because of stellar performances and clever original music.
1. White Heat (1949) is one of the top classic crime-heist dramas of the post-war period. White Heat is an entertaining, fascinating and hypnotic portrait
2. None of Jimmy Cagney's superlative gangster films of the 1930s approaches this supercharged production.
3. Cagney is unforgettable in this fascinating, brutal drama
4. Cagney is a force of nature in this movie, alternately frightening and pathetic.
5. Film noir masterpiece, with brilliant direction and visual style
6. Raoul Walsh's Freudian film is one of the fastest and toughest crime-gangster films ever made, boasting a bravura performance from James Cagney as a misogynist mama boy ("top of the world, Ma").
7. Raoul Walsh's heroes had a knack for going too far, but none went further than James Cagney in this roaring 1949 gangster piece.
8. Magnificent examination of the criminal mind and Cagney's finest moment.
9. Cagney has an excellent supporting cast.
10. Brilliantly directed by Raoul Walsh, an old master of cinema hoodlumism, it returns a more subtle James Cagney to the kind of thug role that made him famous.

Write a one sentence summary of the reviews above.

Raoul Walsh's crime drama goes further into the psychology of a gangster than most fear to tread and James Cagney's portrayal of the tragic anti-hero is constantly volatile.
1. It's cheerful, slightly cheesy entertainment!
2. There is hardly a thing I can say in its favor, except that I was cheered by nearly every minute of it.
3. Brainless fun!
4. The Mummy, quite shamelessly, combines the imagery and serialized thrills of the Indiana Jones movies with the frenetic special-effects energy of the Evil Dead movies, and has quite a bit of fun in doing so.
5. A weightless, instantly forgettable picture!
6. A gaudy comic video game splashed onto the screen!
7. Jump back, monster-mashers; The Mummy mambos!
8. It's the quintessential summer movie: noisy, spectacular and disposable.
9. A well-crafted, great looking adventure, with some spirited performances!
10. Action-packed, fun.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

It's difficult to make a persuasive argument for The Mummy as any kind of meaningful cinematic achievement, but it's undeniably fun to watch.
1. [Those] with a weakness for dry heroism, dark-toned humor, and storytelling of pantherish pace and grace -- in short, lovers of cinema -- should reach for their fedoras, turn up the collars of their coats, and sneak to this picture through a mist of rain.
2. It is arguably the tensest, hardest-edged movie of Melville's career ... and that's saying something.
3. Melville stages riveting set pieces, tense little nuggets of men striking in the dark and dealing out death.
4. A morally ambiguous look at the necessity, the perversity and, sometimes, the generosity of death during wartime.
5. Melville outlines the valorous and dirty deeds of heroes in taut action sequences that reach unusually existential heights. [Blu-ray]
6. Masterfully made, with no detail unattended.
7. ... the most meaningful atmosphere of exquisite suspense you're likely to see at the movies this year. Or most years.
8. Watching it evokes a combination of pity for [the protagonists'] naive idealism and awe at Melville's uncanny brilliance.
9. The result is in many ways the height of Melville's splicings of daredevil, adventure-story heroics and exceedingly grim twists of fate.
10. Movies don't get any better than this.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

Originally made in 1969, this recently reissued classic is a masterful examination of the inner workings of the World War II resistance efforts.
1. The early promise of Henry's Crime wanes as its efforts to splice crime caper with backstage drama becomes increasingly laboured. But with the cast on their game, the film just about gets away with it.
2. There is a lot of plot in Henry's Crime, although there's nothing you couldn't second-guess and while Farmiga is delightful and Caan a joy the end result is unremarkable.
3. Henry's Crime has a little too much in common with its aimless namesake.
4. It's a   grab bag of comic clichés about bank robberies and regional theater.
5. Close but no cigar.
6. You wish anyone on either side of the camera had a cup of coffee and then the energy to throw out weak scenes and flawed motivations while picking up the pace.
7. The gleam in James Caan's eye is about all that illuminates this moribund comedy about a ring of Buffalo hoods who infiltrate a Buffalo staging of The Cherry Orchard.
8. A great cast is wasted on an uninspired script that's frustratingly executed by director Venville.
9. There's a certain ingenuity in the way the plot of Chekhov's play becomes interwoven with the robbery, but for the most part the producers seem to be aiming at, and almost achieving, MFI - maximum feasible implausibility.
10. [VIDEO] wonderful performances from James Caan, Vera Farmiga--and yes even--Keanu Reeves, are the reason to see this movie.
What is the consensus?

Supporting actors Vera Farmiga and James Caan give the movie a little heft, but Henry's Crime is an otherwise predictable heist/comedy with slow pacing.
1. OK, the plot verges on absurdity - but who cares?
2. Not only one of Preminger's greatest, but one of the great noirs.
3. A classic thriller/whodunit of the 1940s. Unfortunately, it remains solidly in the past.
4. Preminger made darker, more characteristically noir films than this, but his only movie that's as good, or perhaps better, is Anatomy of a Murder.
5. Masterpiece: with time, Preminger's second film has become richer in texture and deeper, more ambiguous in meaning than most noirs of the 1940s.
6. Preminger deals in facades, with how perception cheats us, right down to the ideal image of Laura as a portrait. (CinжmathУque Annotations on Film)
7. A feverish trance wrapped in a deadpan investigation
8. A thrilling, absorbing and original example of the genre; it's also beautifully shot, pure escapist entertainment.
9. Laura is still every bit as gripping in 2012.
10. The dialogue is stinging and the performances to be savoured in a haunting study of romantic obsession that deserves its return to the big screen.

What is a brief summary of the following reviews?

A psychologically complex portrait of obsession, Laura is also a deliciously well-crafted murder mystery.
Write an ordered list of reviews about "last chance harvey".

1. Perhaps not the most mesmerizing of love stories, Last Chance Harvey submits one of the most richly acted illustrations of attraction found this year.
2. Last Chance Harvey certainly won't rank among the better script selections made by this impressive cast.
3. Besides being old pros who could elevate such schmaltz in their sleep, Hoffman and Thompson have a genuinely sweet chemistry, which is the exact and only reason to seek this one out.
4. A slight and implausible romance that nonetheless has moments of charm, thanks to its stars. Unfortunately, that's not quite enough.
5. Feigns serious interest in the trickiness of later-in-life love while indulging in corny humor and even worse bathos.
6. One reacts to Joel Hopkins's Last Chance Harvey with about the same level of revulsion directed at its titular character by the people around him.
7. A wonderfully romantic movie that you don't have to be in your 40's or older to appreciate and enjoy.
8. Last Chance Harvey is a standard-order romantic comedy with a couple of unusual ingredients that make it worthy of notice.
9. Entirely satisfying, and a perfectly worthy use of 100 minutes. There are points in life when it does not do to ask any more of a film than this.
10. Dustin Hoffman is subtly brilliant, Emma Thompson is tremendous, and writer/ director Joel Hopkins deserves our thanks for creating such a gentle, wonderful film.
1. Writer-director Andrea Arnold has created something so real and raw, you may come away with a twinge of guilty voyeurism, a sense of peering too closely and impolitely into other people's lives.
2. Writer-director Andrea Arnold, working in British lower-class realism, still finds wondrous moments of connection in Mia's life.
3. [M]arvelously disturbing... There is nothing but unrefined authenticity on display here, in yet another astonishing example of the new British cinematic realism...
4. The one really compelling reason to see it is the startlingly vivid performance of Katie Jarvis, a newcomer.
5. Comes off like Mike Leigh minus the humor and human insight
6. Katie Jarvis has a natural presence that matches the unsentimental minimalism of the film.
7. It's not nearly the film that Red Road was, but it forces us to continue to watch its creator with a keen eye.
8. Fish Tank isn't an easy watch - it's like two hours of ache - but there are rich rewards to be had in the many ways Arnold and her terrific team rend us to and fro.
9. Andrea Arnold is too skilled not to surprise you with the unexpectedly graceful moment, and she has a feel for the downtrodden milieu she loves exploring.
10. [A] miraculous study of adolescence... putting honest, raw, pained humanity before our eyes without apology.
What is the consensus?

Cannes Jury Prize-winner Fish Tank is gritty British realism at its very best, with flawless performances from newcomer Kate Jarvis, and Michael Fassbender.
Write an ordered list of reviews about "1153228-the ringer".

1. "The Ringer" wants to be all things to comedy audiences. It actually pulls this off about half the time.
2. Nobody gets hurt, it doesn't make sense, and no one has any real fun either.
3. Do yourself a favor and rent a very campy Radio instead.
4. More offensive than the poor humor and bad acting...is the cheap arm-twisting created by making this film serve double duty as a promotional piece [for the Special Olympics].
5. What's next in store for the twisted tandem (The Farrelly Brothers)--psychotic Katrina Hurricane victims that like to surf in sewer water?
6. a marshmallow script that takes no risks with the material
7. When The Ringer was over, my world hadn't changed, but there was a smile that remained on my face.
8. It wants to be outwardly bawdy, but is the furthest thing from it.
9. ...skillfully handles its sensitive subject by turning the tables on its characters.
10. The real appeal of The Ringer is how this scrappy bunch rallies together like the nerds in Revenge of the Nerds.
Which movie is the following review about?

Sleeping Dogs Lie -- a/k/a "the dog blowjob rom-com" -- planted the seed (OK, wrong choice of words) that Goldthwait wrings tender humanity from disturbing premises, but his scandalously entertaining new satire proves a darker, funnier success.

1213731-worlds greatest dad
Here are some reviews for a movie: 1. A gorgeous and empowering movie for preteens that not only enchants but tells a moving fable about tragedy, courage and transcendence.
2. The genius of the movie is the way is sidesteps all of the obvious cliches of the underlying story and makes itself fresh, observant, tough and genuinely moving.
3. It's an engaging, well told and moving tale.
4. Castle-Hughes ... combines tribal pride and modern feminism, with gentle strength and the 'natural' talent some children possess.
5. Features one of the finest child performances in years.
6. A thoughtful, vivid spiritual coming-of-age story that transcends its particular cultural context.
7. At its transporting best, Whale Rider seesaws between archetype and innocence -- it's a re-founding myth that happens in real time, before an audience's wondering eyes.
8. Has the feel of a great and rare children's movie.
9. Watching this delightful film, one can see why it has been winning audience favorite awards at film festivals.
10. Think of all the images of girls in U.S. pop movies -- so halter-topped, so perfectly coiffed and appointed, so self-consciously cute, so Mary-Kate-and-Ashleyed. Pai is none of that but much more.

What was the overall consensus about the movie?

An empowering and uplifting movie, with a wonderful performance by Castle-Hughes.
Write an ordered list of reviews about "taxidermia".

1. Despite non-stop horror and perversity, nothing in the movie seems gratuitous. Its vision remains so comprehensive and convincing that it justifies everything that it puts you through.
2. if the imagery is always grotesque, and if the characters are always reduced to their basest drives, Pálfi presents his carnivalesque concerns in an artfully aestheticised package that belies the ugliness within.
3. It's an allegory of sorts, and very different from the fastidious golden age of Hungarian cinema in the Seventies and Eighties.
4. The new film will ambush the unwary, appal the squeamish and get unwanted attention from the prurient. But it has a signature, a wit and a kind of grim strength.
5. It's one of the most astonishing, energetic, chaotic films you'll ever see. And best of all, it could make you decide to give up the diet forever.
6. What is most impressive is Palfi's imagination and the way he develops it on the screen. Gross-out it may be, but there's rather more to it.
7. It breaks taboos with an insouciance that makes Last Tango look like Mary Poppins.
8. You'll need to drag it kicking and screaming from your mind.
9. THE advantage of being The Sneak is that sometimes you can also sneak out of a film screening.
10. Overall, this is a desultory, schizophrenic film that doesn't seem to know what it is.
Which movie is the following review about?

Bullock downplays her trademark mannerisms and allows her character to take precedence.

28 days
Which movie is the following review about?

Uneven in tone and pacing, Larry suffers from an identity crisis, unsure whether it's a wacky, back-to-school comedy or a bittersweet portrait of two lost souls at the crossroads.

larry crowne
Which movie is the following review about?

While the film kept my interest to a degree, it was more out of sheer curiosity of how much sillier writer/director Joby Harold would make the thing.

awake
Which movie is the following review about?

Smart, satirical and nefariously vicious, this is easily one of the finest sci-fi flicks of the 1980s.

1017712-robocop
Which movie is the following review about?

Weekend settles into an intentionally minor-key groove, caught somewhere between bracingly direct honesty and cringingly mumbly pretense.

weekend 2011
1. Ronit Elkabetz gives a lively and at times moving performance as Viviane.
2. Smooth, subtle and continually disturbing.
3. Methodical and agonizing, much like the five-year dispute it depicts.
4. The divorce-centered drama is so provocative it's become a lightning rod for debate inside the country. Even watching from a distance is unnerving.
5. How this did not beat out "Ida" for Best Foreign Film at the Oscars last Sunday I will never understand.
6. Gett has a formal rigor that works like a vise.
7. This all might be laughable if it wasn't based on the very real facts of the Israeli court system, which as portrayed here is like Kafka without the surrealist trappings.
8. Though there is no action, there is vibrancy to the dialog that enthralls for the duration of the film.
9. Sibling writer/directors Ronit & Shlomi Elkabetz turn a spotlight on an Israeli women's rights issue using drama, comedy and farce in a stylized courtroom procedural like no other.
10. The kind of tragic and absurd blend that can only be labeled as Kafkaesque.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

On paper, GETT: The Trial of Viviane Amsalem might seem less than thrilling, but on the screen, it delivers two hours of nonstop, tightly wound, brilliantly acted drama.
1. Hopkins and Banderas are very different sorts of actors, and here, in very different ways, each pulls off his role expertly.
2. The Mask of Zorro typifies what a good summer popcorn movie can be: an action-packed adventure with an actual plot and interesting characters!
3. At its best, this 'Zorro' captures some of the dizzyingly romantic flavor of pulp fiction. ...Unfortunately, Martin Campbell has directed this Mexican melodrama in an often uninspired fashion.
4. A surprisingly good example of Hollywood's craftsmanship.
5. Crisp and competent and often witty, but it only does what it's supposed to do; it's never quite inspired or exhilarating...
6. The Mask of Zorro stands as a pointed riposte to those who say they don't make 'em like that anymore.
7. This is the best movie version of Zorro to date, and High-Definition makes it that much more exciting.
8. Simplistic but sprawling action film...
9. Zorro follows the predictable paths of action movies, but re-energizes the pattern with adrenaline, exuberance, creativity, and humor.
10. Buckling the swash in a way approaching Errol Flynn, Antonio is up for the action and handles the slapstick as the inept student with aplomb. The romance between him and Zeta-Jones has sparks, too.

What is a brief summary of the following reviews?

Banderas returns as an aging Zorro in this surprisingly nimble, entertaining swashbuckler.
1. This mutt of a movie is a real stinker.
2. See Spot Run is just an old dog whose few new tricks are stupid or disgusting.
3. Movies like this demonstrate that when it comes to stupidity and vulgarity, only the best will do for our children.
4. See Spot Run not only exceeds low expectations, but it's also even a pleasant surprise.
5. See Spot Run is so guileless and good-natured that you may just find yourself enjoying it almost half as much as the child who brought you along to the movie.
6. Ten writers! So many writers to make so little!
7. There's a general air of good-naturedness about this movie, a cartoonish spirit that informs the proceedings.
8. By the time the film ends, everyone -- and I mean everyone -- has been humiliated, abused, and generally reduced to Gordon's level of inanity.
9. The kind that's punishment for weekend dads and whatever adult they drag along to help them keep their wits while the kids scream for more poop humor.
10. The result plays terrifically with an all-ages crowd.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

See Spot Run has all the elements chidren enjoy in a movie: a lovable dog, bad things happening to stupid adults, and lots of dog poop. For adults, it's either hit-or-miss.
1. Check up another smash hit for a fine and experienced team.
2. This brilliant Hitchcock offering combines romance, suspense, and international intrigue with unforgettable performances from Grant and Bergman.
3. Notorious (1946) is a classic Hitchcockian post-war psychological suspense/thriller. The basis of the film came from the 1921 Saturday Evening Post two-part
4. the best of Alfred Hitchcock's espionage thrillers and one the strongest works of his extensive cinematic career
5. Alfred Hitchcock's most openly sensual film.
6. The suspense builds continually, operating on multi-layers...
7. Occasionally too slow, but compelling
8. If Rear Window was brilliant because of how deep it was, and Vertigo was brilliant for how existential it was, Notorious is brilliant because of how simple it is.
9. There is also, of course, virtuoso direction from the master.
10. A top-rate film noir.

What is a brief summary of the following reviews?

Sublime direction from Hitchcock, and terrific central performances from Ingrid Bergman and Cary Grant make this a bona-fide classic worthy of a re-visit.
1. Takes us on a journey into the special domain of childhood, a voyage joyous, shattering -- and supremely convincing.
2. ...profoundly moving and bittersweet
3. Nobody Knows has a haunting quality that is all the more effective for its deceptively everyday appearance.
4. Director Hirokazu Koreeda lets his film run on too long, but he gets naturalistic performances from the nonprofessional actors. He also manages to make a docudrama about abandoned kids seem pretty darn poetic, and that's no small feat.
5. Unfolds with such leisurely, terrible beauty, it takes a while to realize that what we are witnessing is the children's long slide into beggary, exacerbated by the slow torture of faint hope.
6. The trouble is that with its lengthy running time Nobody Knows becomes grueling and drawn-out.
7. Hypnotic movie.
8. I certainly came out of Nobody Knows feeling numb; only later, reflecting on the fact that the movie was inspired by a true story, did it occur to me that the numbness could have been deliberate, and that what suffused this picture was a mist of anger.
9. "Nobody Knows" is, in fact, heartbreakingly sad. But it is also fascinating and, oddly, often a joy to watch.
10. Nobody Knows constructs two parallel universes: A realistic world of everyday activities, set apart from a more subjective world of fantasy and imagination.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

Tragic and haunting, a beautifully heart-wrenching portrait of child abandonment.
Which movie is the following review about?

A real winner -- smart, funny, subtle, and resonant.

secret ballot
1. The epitome of CGI's best and worst attributes.
2. delightfully anachronistic piece of digital mastery
3. ...takes the audience to the Shangra La of Lost Horizons, the undersea world of... 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, and straight to King Kong's Skull Island.
4. Occasionally threatens to collapse under the weight of its own production, but all in all it's an exhilarating experience, and raises the bar for the use of digital technology in film.
5. It should feel like Star Wars, yet it fails to feel like a movie at all. Conran has done his work almost too well. It's as if you're sitting in front of an outsize comic book with a speed reader as page-turner.
6. The clincher is how the actors are reduced to puppets and ciphers; Paltrow straight-jacketed in her Hildy Johnson-style two-piece and the evidently bored Law reduced throughout half the movie to giving the gimlet eye through flying goggles.
7. For its writer-director, Sky Captain was a labour of love. For almost everyone else -- including the wooden cast -- it's just a labour.
8. Director Kerry Conran hasn't just mimicked his favorite serials and comic books. He's written a love letter to the full scope of 1930s and '40s films by basically making one.
9. It's the story that gets in the wayof this magic show, coasting along a much more awkward path that finally hardly seems to matter.
10. This debut feature by Kerry Conran is a triumph not only for its technical mastery but for its good taste.
What is the consensus?

Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow is slim on plot and characterization, but the visuals more than make up for it.
Summarize the following movie reviews:

1. I think at this point somebody needs to tell Robin Williams that the whole white-guy hip-hop routine was played out around 1997.
2. Been there done that.
3. The best joke is that the RV in question gets 4 miles to the gallon. With mileage like that, not even Hollywood is going to be able to afford the next road-trip film.
4. How fallen is the mighty Robin Williams, to plummet from the quality of "One Hour Photo" to "RV," a nearly unbearable movie.
5. What follows plays a lot like National Lampoon's Vacation, only without that film's refreshing sense of cruelty
6. Exceedingly juvenile and strained of any colorful imagination not to mention hopelessly lame, RV is a colossally clunky vehicle in every sense of the word.
7. A workmanlike family comedy with enough pratfalls and poo jokes for tykes and enough sentimentality for parents.
8. RV works up an ingratiating sweetness that partially compensates for its blunt predictability and meager laughs.
9. A family film that is only sporadically funny.
10. If Robin Williams is seeking a return to comedy glory, RV is not the vehicle that will take him there.

An unoriginal and only occasionally funny family road-trip movie, RV is a mediocre effort that not even the charisma of Robin Williams can save.
1. This charming, delicate and wholly captivating story of a ten-year-old girl who just wants to be one of the boys will get a big boost from positive responses from critics and audiences alike.
2. Two feature films into her career, writer-director Céline Sciamma has proven unusually skilled at making short, plot-light movies about budding adolescents discovering themselves.
3. A sensitive study of pre-teen sexuality and confused gender roles, from a director who knows how to draw flawless turns from young 'uns.
4. Celine Sciamma is a filmmaking force to be reckoned with in the coming years. Her story-writing ability, deft hand at directing and understanding of her young actors makes her someone to watch.
5. a melding of youthful allure, keen dramatic structure and the delicate art of directing the young
6. The awful inevitability that Laure could be found out at any moment--by her parents, by her friends--renders Tomboy an excruciating viewing experience.
7. Sciamma has wound back the clock to childhood to show us, with taste and sensitivity, something we have not seen.
8. There's an absolute naturalism to all the performances here. That's crucial, especially from Heran, who's playing a character who does not yet know herself.
9. Its young heroine is proud to be herself; there's just not much for her to do beyond that.
10. A beautiful, matter-of-fact French drama about a young girl who wants to be a boy - and for one singular summer around her 10th birthday passes as one...
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

In tune with the emotion and tribulations of childhood, Tomboy is a charming movie that treats its main subject with warmth and heart.
Summarize the following movie reviews:

1. It risks offense by putting a typically Adam Sandler-ian twist on a tired familial trope, though such risks can often be the only thing enlivening forced franchise installments like this one.
2. It's not a completely original film, but it's fun, quick and ingenious. [Full review in Spanish]
3. You won't hate yourself for liking this movie, but it's really nothing more than filler
4. Roughly twice as many laughs as the original. Still not enough, though the little kids will giggle.
5. Intimate observations on the modern family are not what you expect from an animated sequel meant to keep Sandler's career undead.
6. Hotel Transylvania 2 offers cute but brainless escapism for young moviegoers - as well as parents looking to distract their children for a few hours.
7. Good news is that Sandler as a writer is still exploring the fatherhood themes that we saw in the first one, bad news is it feels like we already saw this movie in 2012. [Full review in Spanish]
8. A watered down version of the original. [Full review in Spanish]
9. A few chuckles here and there...
10. It's in that lengthy middle where the film gets lost.

Hotel Transylvania 2 is marginally better than the original, which may or may not be enough of a recommendation to watch 89 minutes of corny, colorfully animated gags from Adam Sandler and company.
1. Thanks for the surgical enhancement, Tara Reid. As I always say, if saline made you a great actor then Sean Penn would have gills.
2. Actually has an entire group of adults call out to a lost comrade, 'Marco!' What does he expect the audience to do when they hear that? I mean, come on.
3. (Christian) Slater and (Tara) Reid share quite possibly the most awkward love scene ever recorded on film.
4. [A]n instant classic of cheeseball cinema, an orgy of overblown dialogue and hammy overacting, 90-some-odd minutes of cheap-looking, jaw-dropping incoherence...
5. They say that even ugly babies have faces their mothers love, but this is truly a film that not even hardcore genre fans could appreciate.
6. On the short list of Worst Movies Ever Made.
7. There's a point in the movie where it's best to stop trying to make sense out of this unintelligible story... right after the opening credits.
8. Perhaps hoping to be a sort of hybrid Matrix meets Indiana Jones meets Alien, Unfortunately, Alone in the Dark is just a bad movie.
9. Worse than you can imagine... see 1997's The Relic instead.
10. ...asking the viewer to accept Tara Reid as a scientist is pure insanity, requiring a staggering leap of faith that I can't even begin to contemplate.
What is the consensus?

Inept on almost every level, Alone in the Dark may not work as a thriller, but it's good for some head-slapping, incredulous laughter.
Write a one sentence review of the movie "trainwreck".

Trainwreck drags commitment out of all but the most rom-com-phobic filmgoers with sharp humor, relatable characters, and hilarious work from Amy Schumer.
Write a one sentence review of the movie "half nelson".

Half Nelson features powerful performances from Ryan Gosling and Shareeka Epps. It's a wise, unsentimental portrait of lonely people at the crossroads.
1. The Bar Mitzvah Boy gets the boot!
2. Although the subject might sound specialized, the picture is engineered with such skill that it transcends the ethnic details to become a universal story of a boy trying to find his place in an inhospitable world.
3. A dolorous comedy that leans heavily, if inoffensively, on ethnic stereotypes.
4. Itâ(TM)s designed to be crowd-pleasing and tug on hearts across the board, but thereâ(TM)s a manipulative quality that will put a ceiling on business.
5. a satisfying little surprise
6. Like Running with Scissors or an exceptionally cruel episode of The Wonder Years, Paul Weiland's whimsical and eye-poppingly bright comedy is shot through with cringe-inducing misery.
7. A sprightly English comedy about a very special Bar Mitzvah, World Cup Fever, and the frantic efforts of a 12-year old boy to get the attention he feels he deserves.
8. ...so unrelenting on the misery it piles upon poor Bernie Reubens you may just feel guilty laughing...
9. Sweet, sentimental and funny in a warm and fuzzy way, even if it's somewhat predictable and few of the actors seem very Jewish.
10. This comedy-drama is wafer-thin, but Marsan gives it some heft as an all-too-human father.
What is the consensus?

Likable but overly sentimental, Sixty Six has snatches of sharp dialogue but is ultimately too predicable.
Here are some reviews for a movie: 1. The movie takes us to the most dangerous peaks of the French Alps and to the breath-taking slopes of southeastern Alaska that are accessible only by helicopter.
2. I wish the filmmakers had gone a bit more into the psychology of what drives these men...
3. With more white powder than even Al Pacino's nose housed in 'Scarface', Steep pushes human endurance and achievement to the limit with indescribable eye-popping crazy feats of Big Mountain glory.
4. I'm not a skier. My balance is bad, and that stuff scares me. So more power to those who are - this flick's for you. And probably not anyone else.
5. In the end, Steep plays like a TV infomercial -- and who wants to hand over $11 to watch one?
6. so many shots of one person skiing down impossibly steep slopes that the film becomes mundane. The shots of snowy peaks are pretty, but they get pretty old after 92 minutes.
7. Adrenaline junkies and armchair sports enthusiasts should enjoy this informative history of extreme skiing.
8. A second-rate documentary for extreme ski fans only.
9. If you like your skiing extreme but your documentaries safe, then carve a sharp turn over to Steep.
10. Steep is a visually exhilarating sports documentary that is also more than a little exasperating.

What was the overall consensus about the movie?

Steep is a mixed bag of breathtaking mountain footage and yawn-inducing banter.
1. The Tribe builds to a revolution in your attention, forcing you to change not just how you watch the film but how you feel its characters, but director Miroslav Slaboshpitsky is sly enough to ease you in.
2. Visually, it's striking. Narratively, it's one long nightmare of confrontation and misery.
3. Based on Slaboshpytskiy's experience as a crime reporter and on stories of Ukraine's "deaf Mafia," it's less a social portrait than an experiment in shaking up the balance of our senses: A tale of no sound, just fury.
4. The lack-of-language barrier is the least of its problems.
5. For those who can take it, "The Tribe" is a movie of undeniable emotional power, unlike anything you've seen before.
6. While The Tribe does at times feel designed to be shocking, it also demands that you pay attention in a way that we're not used to paying attention in the movies.
7. If "The Tribe" were set in the hearing world, its desolation would seem reductive and forced, a pose rather than a statement. Without words, the movie becomes a nihilistic fable and, indeed, something unheard of until now. It's silent opera.
8. The Tribe isn't afraid to shed blood, but its stiff acting, disgusting depiction of sex, and inability to completely comprehend the film's message is crippling to the film's overall enjoyment.
9. It's a cinematic tightrope act, and it is to Slaboshpitsky's credit that he pulls it off.
10. A bleak, daring drama from Ukraine.

What is a brief summary of the following reviews?

A bleak, haunting drama whose wordless dialogue speaks volumes, The Tribe is a bold, innovative take on silent films for a contemporary audience.
1. For Arnold's career, at least, it's not quite the end of days.
2. An intelligent and high energy science fiction tale that is a lot of good old fashioned fun.
3. File this one somewhere in the upper echelon of Arnold films -- it won't make you forget The Terminator, but it's much more endurable than the likes of Eraser.
4. Essentially Schwarzenegger Lite, definitely a new flavor -- but it still gets the job done. For lack of a better word, it's pleasing.
5. Experience says that the weaker the story, effects or both in these contemporary sci-fi/effects/action spectaculars, the more they juice up the sound. Happily, The 6th Day stands as a modest exception to the rule.
6. The best Schwarzenegger movie in years.
7. [I enjoyed] enough of the film to recommend it just slightly, especially to Arny fans.
8. An enjoyable -- if not stellar -- entry into his action pantheon.
9. This movie knows how to entertain.
10. It is probably the most enjoyable Schwarzenegger flick since Eraser.

Write a one sentence summary of the reviews above.

This offering from Arnold Schwarzenegger contains an intriguing, disturbing premise, but the film's execution is too routine and formulaic to make good use of it.
Write an ordered list of reviews about "avp2".

1. Un spectacle insipide, ennuyant ŕ mourir et de trčs mauvais goűt
2. Well, there's not much to see here. And I mean that literally.
3. Too underlit to qualify as splatter, too bloodless to qualify as fun, too unaware of its own idiocy to be enjoyed Grindhouse-style, AvP:R is a real education in the finer stratifications of badness.
4. Well, it's official: the Road to Hell is pretty much paved over ... the Strause Brothers ... expressed their [good] intention to return to the dark, scary tone of 1979's Alien, yet Requiem is just about as bad as its 2004 predecessor.
5. i want more aliens fewer people!
6. Does Alien vs. Predator: Requiem spell the end of the dual-monster franchise? Let's hope so
7. Aliens VS Predator - Requiem is the second film in the over hyped and under performing crossover series, which brings nothing new to the table while tarnishing the franchises' original films.
8. If this is what the future holds for both franchises, then today's youngsters are welcome to it.
9. ...an utterly needless sequel that's sure to disappoint fans of both franchises...
10. In a word, repugnant.
1. [Danner is] clearly having a ball with this character.
2. Refreshingly adult, sweet-tempered and rather special little romantic comedy-drama focusing on a generally underserved age group -- and presenting that group in a new light.
3. While this gentle comedy itself isn't a deathless work of art, the role turns out to have been worth the wait for this longtime character actress.
4. Reflections on the highs and lows in rites of passage, in this bittersweet tale channeling the female experience of aging. Along with the humorous when not harrowing cross-generational bonding that can awkwardly kick in.
5. A beautiful and smart coming-of-old-age film.
6. A confident feature angel-kissed with an enviable cast (extending well beyond just Danner) and an often lovely script.
7. Humble drama works thanks to good characters and performances
8. Sweet and carefully made.
9. Offers gentle laughs and a few moments of heartfelt emotion.
10. Danner Delights in "Dreams."
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

I'll See You in My Dreams would be worth watching even if Blythe Danner's central performance was all it had going for it, but this thoughtful drama satisfies on multiple levels.
Summarize the following movie reviews:

1. One of the most viscerally felt films of the year.
2. With its sharp eye for telling details Maria Full of Grace often has the feel of the very best documentaries.
3. through both Marston's and Moreno's refusal to play up her pain or struggles, we care even more about how her believable tale will end.
4. [Director] Joshua Marston's meticulous eye for cold, hard facts on his subject matter raises Maria Full of Grace above the level of mere docudrama.
5. [C]oncerned with laying out what is, with a clear-eyed realism that's devastating and mesmerizing in its simple, unembellished authenticity.
6. Marston's zeal in telling the story is a flaw and also a boon
7. A stunner of a film.
8. A gripping, deeply moving film.
9. One of the emblematic migration stories of our time.
10. From start to finish, fascinating, compelling film, filled with excellent performances and sage direction.

In a striking debut, Moreno carries the movie and puts a human face on the drug trade.
Summarize the following movie reviews:

1. Woo doesn't have Yimou's natural feel for the courtly culture, or, perhaps, his sweeping way with this type of story. But his hand is sure and his eye, as ever, finds beauty in everything, even death.
2. Returning to his roots after a stint in Hollywood, Woo has made the most expensive film in mainland Chinese history, a pleasantly traditional picture that marks a new direction for one of the world's premier action maestros.
3. Not a bad consolation prize, but not the complex, multilayered drama that made Red Cliff a hit in Asia.
4. From landscape shots that have the serene beauty of a Han Dynasty watercolor, to its dramatic naval engagements and thundering cavalry charges, this is magnificent filmmaking, and a magnificent film.
5. The cuts may be appalling to those who've seen the original, but I'm not one of them, and I think this version is pretty solid.
6. It's all about the action.
7. The compelling emotion that marks the best Woo movies is AWOL. The pacing is choppy, with most of the human moments lopped off. Is the Han emperor the good guy? Or should we cheer the rebellious opposition warlords? And what the heck is a viceroy?
8. It's almost 2 1/2 hours, and too much is corny, cramped, and vague.
9. A magnificent achievement...both fascinating and fun--so good, in fact, that after watching this cut you just might to search out the director's original 280-minute version.
10. a historical epic featuring great characters, extremely clever tactical maneuvering, and scope, scope, scope...

Featuring some impressively grand battlefield action, John Woo returns to Asia and returns to form in the process for this lavish and slick historical epic.
Summarize the following movie reviews:

1. Big rave in little blurb!
2. A wholly enjoyable mixture of action, comedy, romance, and horror.
3. This is a bizarre, fun, action packed film, filled with wild characters and an adventurous, imaginative and campy spirit.
4. Works as a stand alone classic that features John Carpenter at his best.
5. A film to embody the Eighties, and justify them
6. Benefits from a rollicking wise-ass performance from Kurt Russell but otherwise falls limp courtesy of too many corny gags.
7. The high-octane action comedy takes all that was worthwhile from decades of B-flicks and distills it into a maximum-concentration explosion of cinematic TNT.
8. A 'B'-movie-style Western meets Eastern, a supernatural 'chopsocky' fantasy with leading man Kurt Russell doing a feature-length impression of a dead movie star. Put that in your pipe and smoke it. [Blu-ray]
9. Russell and Carpenter make a great team.
10. Imperfect, yes...but still great cultish fun with Kurt Russell.

Brimming with energy and packed with humor, Big Trouble in Little China distills kung fu B-movies as affectionately as it subverts them.
Write a one sentence review of the movie "lilja 4 ever".

A tragic, hard-hitting story about a teenager trapped in a life of prostitution.