cindermond/bento huggingface dataset:
1. Not very impressive from a storytelling aspect.
2. The summer blockbuster we've been waiting for.
3. It doesn't even seem like Burton showed up to direct this turkey.
4. Whatever the faults of the first Planet and its sequels, they were all about something; this film is pure, empty (if gorgeous) spectacle.
5. Works equally well as a popcorn adrenaline-heart-pumper as it does a pop-philosophical inquiry into the nature of humanity.
6. Burton provides plenty of eye candy and a few giggles, but ultimately his film has little soul.
7. One more disappointment in a summer of lackluster 'event pictures.'
8. In the tradition of Independence Day, Twister, and the original Jurassic Park, this is a great Summer Movie.
9. The most uneven motion picture Tim Burton has ever made.
10. It is a potent action film with some philosophical meat on its bones

Write a one sentence summary of the reviews above.

This remake of Planet of the Apes can't compare to the original in some critics' mind, but the striking visuals and B-movie charms may win you over.
Which movie is the following review about?

10,000 B.C. is a load of crap dressed up with pretty background vistas. The film is terminally lifeless, something that a so-called 'event' picture should never be.

10000 bc
1. It is downright depressing to think about all that vigorous cinematic artistry and expertise aimed so low.
2. Pitting the bad guys against each other merely recycles all the shtick we've seen before.
3. Fans of the two series will laugh, because the genre is so squarely skewered. Others will wonder what the big deal is, having seen King Kong vs. Godzilla, Mothra vs. Rodan and any number of sitcom weddings.
4. A tediously ghastly genre pic.
5. While the filmmakers send up the genre's cliches and expected audience empathy with the villains, it still feels like the ludicrous dialogue and one-dimensional characterizations were written by teenagers.
6. A goofy but occasionally fun novelty that's more enjoyable than it has any right to be.
7. There are far less lively ways to spend a night at the movies.
8. Does a decent job of making like the 1980s never ended.
9. A horror fan's wet bloodfest with an outrageous story line and plenty of laughs.
10. Freddy vs. Jason succeeds as a guilty pleasure.

What is a brief summary of the following reviews?

Fans of the two horror franchises will enjoy this showdown. But for everyone else, it's the same old slice and dice.
1. With all it's faults, it does produce a steady stream of giggles.
2. Neither one for the dogs nor the cat's pajamas.
3. A silly, stupid story with a one-joke comic premise.
4. Its relative modesty lends Mr. Schneider's deft, ingenuous performance an unexpected glow of innocence.
5. There's a whole lot of stuff like The Animal to the point that there's no longer anything outrageous about its outrageousness.
6. The one running joke in The Animal becomes familiar and predictable all too soon.
7. Neither as bad as it might be nor as entertaining as it should be.
8. Let's hear it for stupendously dumb screen writing.
9. I'm no fan of injury-based humor, but I guess if there were any actor I'd like to see pummeled, it'd be Rob Schneider.
10. ... lurches from scene to scene, some of them ending with a comedic thud, but most just fading into nothingness.

Write a one sentence summary of the reviews above.

While less offensive and more charming than recent gross-humored comedies, The Animal is still rather mediocre.
Here are some reviews for a movie: 1. [Philip] Kaufman's version persuasively asserts its right to life as an imaginative reflection of our time...
2. On top of being an engrossing conspiracy thriller in step with the gritty urban tales of the time, the Invasion of the Body Snatchers is also a genuinely creepy film which slyly suggests there is something sinister beneath the surface.
3. Invasion of the Body Snatchers validates the entire concept of remakes.
4. Siegel gave the frissons classical sharpness while Kaufman goes for baroque erudition
5. Set at the intersection of post-Vietnam paranoia and the myopic introspection that became hippiedom's most lasting cultural contribution, the Philip Kaufman-directed Invasion alternates social commentary with impeccably crafted scares.
6. If not quite as great as its predecessor, still a pretty damn fine genre picture.
7. A superior sci-fi thriller that makes even raindrops, plants and electrical cords take on sinister life.
8. It's not only the best of the four films based on Jack Finney's story, but also one of the best films of the 1970s.
9. Ideas that Siegel knocked off in a few shots are expanded to fill entire sequences -- but they're good ideas, and can stand a little stretching.
10. The dog with a human head rocks!

What was the overall consensus about the movie?

Employing gritty camerawork and evocative sound effects, Invasion of the Body Snatchers is a powerful remake that expands upon themes and ideas only lightly explored in the original.
Which movie is the following review about?

Instead of Deliverance's deep backwoods hicks we have now backwoods chavs who live a life unscrutinised by cops or anyone. Watkins has consumed all those tabloid hoodie tales and regurgitated a horror.

eden lake
1. As much as I enjoyed spending time with these characters, it's hard not to bristle at the overall After-School Special vibe.
2. A fine film with much on its mind, and while suffering from occasional missteps, it holds together as a terrific expression of worry and relocation, inspecting the less illuminated side of the American Dream.
3. When most filmmakers want to say something important about cultural conflicts, they labor to bring tears to our eyes. Dabis, by contrast, makes us laugh at ourselves and, in turn, each other.
4. A remarkably engaging, observant approach to a prickly situation
5. It's one of those movies that plays to the cheap seats, making the racism bigger, the assimilation process rougher, and the family squabbles extra-broad, lest viewers miss the point.
6. Stands as one of the most accomplished recent films about a non-European immigrant coming to the United States.
7. The good humor, generosity, and love Dabis bestows on her characters in this assured first feature are uniquely hers -- the mark of a talent to watch
8. As it stands, the movie just serves up another warmed-over Ellis Island rehash.
9. The thriving subgenre of immigrant displacement dramedy gets a confident new spin from Cherien Dabis.
10. Amreeka isn't great, but it's a relief when a movie that touches on America's post-9/11 unease regarding Muslims and the Arab world isn't full of condemnation.

Write a one sentence summary of the reviews above.

A dramedy that's got a taste for the tragic as well as the poignantly comic, Amreeka adds a new sweetness to the hope and distress of the immigrant experience.
Write a one sentence review of the movie "tailor of panama".

The Tailor of Panama is a smart, darkly satirical thriller with exuberant performances from Pierce Brosnan and Geoffrey Rush.
1. Jettisoning the franchise's optimistic, socially aware sci-fi, not to mention character development or a logical plot, Darkness turns out to be any Vulcan's worst nightmare: Team America: World Police with Tribbles.
2. Abrams' sophomore effort picks its references well, builds on the relationships established in the original series (and tweaked in the last movie) and keeps the quips and battles coming. Warp speed, Captain.
3. "Star Trek Into Darkness" is ridiculously exciting. Which is to say it's so exciting it's ridiculous. But in a good way.
4. You don't have to be totally immersed in Trekkie lore to follow "Into Darkness," but a bit of basic Trek 101 would at least shed a little guiding light.
5. It's definitely a fun action movie, but I'm ready for these films to boldly go in their own direction, instead of hanging on to the originals.
6. A tribute to excess, but in a good way, sort of.
7. Most of the logic has leached away from this movie, and with it half of the fun.
8. ..the epic scale of the action and amazing quality of the visuals, plus the sheer fun of hanging with trusted friends, puts this entry light years ahead of most competing blockbusters, even if intellectually it never leaves space dock.
9. Do we boldly go where no man has gone before? From a plot standpoint, the answer is a resounding no, but that doesn't mean that its is a boring retread of past storylines. It's an energetic, thrilling mash-up of past storylines.
10. Action set pieces interrupt with sonic booms, like clockwork, whenever the character development lasts more than a few minutes.
What is the consensus?

Visually spectacular and suitably action packed, Star Trek Into Darkness is a rock-solid installment in the venerable sci-fi franchise, even if it's not as fresh as its predecessor.
1. Nicely mixed lighter-than-air comedy with poignant moments amid Brazil's political authoritarian governments in the 1970s.
2. I found the film fascinating for showing me entertainingly a world I still know very little about.
3. Mauro's character is underwritten, but Michel Joelsas delivers a believable, pained lad capable of still being a child.
4. The Year My Parents Went on Vacation seems to be about, in the end, is big-time sport as the opiate of the masses.
5. Director Cao Hamburger, a Brazilian of Italian and German descent, treats this development with a very light hand.
6. A gentle coming-of-age film set in 1970 Brazil.
7. Be patient and brace yourself for the climax; the wait is definitely worthwhile.
8. This 1970-set tale of a 12-year-old shaped by three driving forces--his country's brutal dictatorship, his left-wing parents' disappearance and a nation's obsession with the World Cup--pulls you into a well-observed world and its characters.
9. This nuanced coming-of-age drama by Cao Hamburger exudes warmth without getting mired in nostalgia.
10. An emotionally touching Brazilian film about the spiritual riches and rewards of hospitality experienced by an abandoned and lonely young boy in a strange place.
What is the consensus?

Hamburger deftly refracts the sociopolitical tumult of early '70s Brazil through the lens of a young boy's coming of age, and Joelsas' performance is wise beyond his years.
Summarize the following movie reviews:

1. One of the most remarkable films of 2001, and it deserves a much larger audience than it has so far gained.
2. Donnie Darko ranks among Gattaca, Pi and Dark City for pure imagination -- and surpasses them for astonishing execution.
3. You either love it or hate it. For those who loved it, I have only one word: overrated.c
4. A faithfully rendered head trip.
5. In its metaphysical concerns and challenging notions about personal and social responsibility, the film aims much higher than most American youth pictures.
6. Donnie Darko's flaws, though, are those of a young, talented filmmaker reaching beyond his current grasp. That's a more forgivable sin than soulless excess or hubris-fueled incompetence.
7. Donnie Darko has plenty of problems. But most stem from a young filmmaker overswinging on his first time up to the plate and hitting a deep fly out rather than a home run.
8. Kelly captures, better than any film in recent memory other than Election, what it feels like to be in high school.
9. The original was a movie for all those castaways who believe in unexplained phenomenon; the new version reads like a handbook on how to pick up women.
10. The big screen, in any shape or form, is the ideal way to experience Donnie Darko, and so a re-release like this is a rare and welcome gift.

Richard Kelly's debut feature Donnie Darko is a daring, original vision, packed with jarring ideas and intelligence and featuring a remarkable performance from Jake Gyllenhaal as the troubled title character.
Here are some reviews for a movie: 1. There is a palpable chemistry between Forster and Wahlberg as the two very different, generationally separated diamond men...
2. The pleasure that these two men share in one another's company, both as characters and performers, radiates through every frame.
3. Forster's rich, realistic, heartfelt portrayal elevates Diamond Men even further.
4. It's a nice little movie about the friendship of two regular Joes, odd and affecting.
5. The kind of keenly observed, artfully crafted, warmly humane movie that keeps us going through the weekly helping of big-screen duds.
6. Cohen, who has been in the diamond business, has directed with a sure, non-wasteful hand and with touching empathy for both men.
7. It is a treasure.
8. Cohen is himself a former 'diamond man,' which is no doubt why this world has been so perfectly realized for the screen.
9. The story's considerable charms make it all worthwhile.
10. Watching Diamond Men, it's easy to see what the fuss about Forster is about.

What was the overall consensus about the movie?

Robert Forster's tour-de-force performance, along with Daniel M. Cohen's sensitive direction and subtly shaded screenplay, brings rare heft to this mentor/protégé buddy film.
1. It's this kind of flat-footed stuff that gives garbage a bad name.
2. While Re-Animator fails as a faithful adaptation of Lovecraft, it is an incredibly demented movie in its own right that combines a plethora of downright disgusting grand guignol with disturbing black humor.
3. A classic horror-comedy.
4. This is one of the greatest films ever made. Period. It's outrageous, erotic, gory, jaw-dropping, genre-busting ,shocking, and altogether exhilarating filmmaking.
5. Stuart Gordon doesn't just push the envelope of good taste with this one; he tears right through it.
6. In its best moments, the film itself practically leaps off the screen.
7. Thumpingly good gore-fest.
8. It's no match for The Evil Dead, but as far as tongue-in-bloody-cheek gorefests go, this update of the H.P. Lovecraft tale is a lot of fun, and it easily earns its cult status.
9. It's sweet when a classic lives up to its legend, isn't it?
10. It's so politically incorrect that there is no way anyone would be able to make it today.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

Perfectly mixing humor and horror, the only thing more effective than Re-Animator's gory scares are its dry, deadpan jokes.
1. It's fun and gives this genre a new twist.
2. Go.
3. It's funny and witty at times, and it has some decent jolts here and there. (Full Content Review for Parents also available)
4. The wonderfully inventive meta-story leads to a riotous conclusion that trashes the rules of the teen fright flick.
5. This Cabin may not be the Parthenon, but it's definitely a place to worship the gods of horror.
6. The script is inspired, the direction is sprightly, and the third act does not falter. And everything you need to know is in the title. Well, almost everything.
7. This movie gives me faith that Hollywood is actually willing to do something outside the box in the name of entertainment.
8. The expected happens, but with a twist.
9. An entertaining and wholly original genre hybrid film that has more than a few tricks up its sleeves.
10. This is the most fun I have ever had watching a horror film.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

The Cabin in the Woods is an astonishing meta-feat, capable of being funny, strange, and scary -- frequently all at the same time.
Summarize the following movie reviews:

1. Shakespeare in Love stands on its wonderful cast, its solid direction and very clever script.
2. Entertaining, witty and acutely funny, with the ability to appeal to more than Shakespeare buffs. But for real fans of the Bard, it's a glorious treat that's smart and humorous, with highly appealing performances all round.
3. Sniping at what's already been celebrated as a major national triumph always looks not-quite-cricket, but Madden's film is transparently one of those things that the British Do So Well, and the Americans fund so handsomely.
4. The film is literate without being pretentious, bawdy without being gross and grounded in historical fact without being constricted by it.
5. Taking the writing process behind Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet as its inspiration, John Madden's follow-up to Mrs Brown combines contemporary humour with a convincing 16th-century setting.
6. Shakespeare in Love crackles with the in-jokey brilliance that we associate with the playwright Tom Stoppard.... And you don't have to be a Shakespeare scholar to appreciate this movie's wit and easygoing references to the entertainment world today.
7. Get thee to the nearest movie theater showing Shakespeare in Love, a delightful comedy that sparkles with wit, literary smarts, passionate romance and expert acting by a glossy, enthusiastic cast.
8. In addition to Fiennes, who does a star-making job here, and the radiant Paltrow, Shakespeare in Love teems with wonderful performances.
9. This romantic farce has a talented cast and energy to spare, but somehow the ingredients don't burn as brightly as one would expect from such promising ingredients.
10. You can't miss with a movie that speaks the language of love with such hotblooded delight. And in iambic pentameter, too.

Endlessly witty, visually rapturous, and sweetly romantic, Shakespeare in Love is a delightful romantic comedy that succeeds on nearly every level.
1. Has the mark of something dashed off after reading what dozens of screenwriting manuals had to say about the marketplace and the three-act paradigm, but not one word about characterization or dramatic unity.
2. A close reading of Mr. Woodcock reveals a dark, depressing film about small town decline. I think.
3. The whole film is like a depressing nightmare.
4. Apparently, Billy Bob Thornton has embraced the idea of appealing to the lowest possible common denominator. How else can you explain his presence in another bad taste bottom-feeder which might have been better titled Bad Gym Teacher, ala Bad Santa?
5. we're stuck with Amy Poehler telling us she's an alcoholic and an unaware Susan Sarandon watching two men act like idiots, which unfortunately isn't funny at all.
6. ...a tedious and hackneyed effort that surely (and hopefully) marks Billy Bob Thornton's final appearance as a comedically misanthropic curmudgeon...
7. Mr Woodcock is ok as far as predictable, low-brow Hollywood comedies are concerned, and it's considerably elevated by its above average cast.
8. O longa năo apenas acaba se revelando terrivelmente sem graça como também assusta por sua moral torta, condizente com a do personagem-título.
9. One can't help but wonder what the Coens or Farrellys might have done with this cast and premise.
10. A terrible, sophomoric joke of a title, which is sadly reflective of the rest of the equally unfunny proceedings.
What is the consensus?

Underutilizing a talented cast, Mr. Woodcock lacks the comic energy and timing to make the most of its intriguing premise.
1. I enjoyed it. It's a fun, dumb and gross comedy that kids will love.
2. Mostly animated PG film has gross-out humor, violence.
3. You'll probably find yourself laughing at Bill Murray farting. I did.
4. The plot's so much old rote, and the characters have all the personality of protoplasm; but the anthropomorphising of this microcosmic metropolis is wonderfully imaginative, and the dialogue decidedly spiffy.
5. ...the whole thing eventually becomes bogged down in its own plot.
6. It is funny, original, and even contains a genuine, good-natured theme.
7. I'd advise attendees of this film to go on an empty stomach, but if you're willing to endure the Farrellys' warped sense of humor and Murray's scratching, squirting, gas-passing antics, Osmosis Jones offers some lighthearted fun.
8. The ideas are there, hints of genius, but no one ignites them.
9. The design of this colorful interior metropolis is both clever and biologically correct.
10. The over-riding question with all comedies is 'Are there many laughs in it?' Luckily, the answer is yes - there are lots of great jokes, and not all of the scatological kind.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

The animated portion of Osmosis is zippy and fun, but the live-action portion is lethargic.
1. Bridesmaids is the sort of movie in which you know exactly how everything is going to turn out by the end, but the characterizations are strong enough to overcome the formulaic template.
2. In this movie, romantic envy and class envy coalesce, because Bridesmaids understands just how they're linked. Even if money can't buy you love, being broke puts you at a distinct disadvantage.
3. In an age when so many Hollywood chick-flicks seem to really hate women, it's refreshing to see a character-driven movie about women. The humor here is outrageous, bawdy, sometimes even scatological, but it's never misogynist.
4. Paul Feig's film has gambled on women, assuming that female moviegoers are sick of being reduced to man-starved, materialistic shopaholics by Hollywood.
5. This is a smart and funny movie that satisfyingly expands the Apatow brand.
6. "Bridesmaids'' openly, comfortably turns the stress of being girlfriends into comedy. It's really about the single friend backing away from the edge of temporary insanity.
7. This is one very funny flick, which may require a second viewing, lest loud laughter rob you of hearing some of the lines - especially during an eye-popping pivotal scene that was once the purview of the boys: the big gross-out.
8. Just as Apatow redefined leading men in a more realistic manner, Wiig may well change the way Hollywood looks at ladies.
9. The setup is ripe for a black comedy but the movie never fully embraces the darkness and the level of humor is on par with the limp skits for which Wiig is responsible on Saturday Night Live.
10. [Bridesmaids is] one of the funniest films in the past few years.

What is a brief summary of the following reviews?

A marriage of genuine characters, gross out gags, and pathos, Bridesmaids is a female-driven comedy that refuses to be boxed in as Kristen Wiig emerges as a real star.
1. exemplary crime stuff, complex anti-hero and all.
2. It is distinguished by the intelligence of its plotting and the fullness of its characterizations: These are believable people, not merely plot fodder.
3. Not only as good as any American thriller of the past several years, but boasts a totally unique premise.
4. The moral dilemmas raised by the assassin and Mr. Decleir's fierce performance are what make the stylish straightforward policier somewhat memorable.
5. A sort of 'CSI: Antwerp' episode from a director who seems to be auditioning for the next Jason Bourne adventure.
6. The cat-and-mouse game that Ledda and especially Vincke play is fun to watch.
7. What if grandpa was a hit man, and he was rapidly losing his mind during a killer assignment?
8. The unusual Antwerp locations, the visual style of the filmmaking, and the soulfulness of the performances make it a welcome European addition to the genre.
9. A strong showcase for Declair, who plays Ledda as a cagey survivor on a vendetta and juggling cat-and-mouse games with the cops, his future victims and his faltering mind.
10. While Decleir and De Bouw provide exceptionally fine performances, the film devolves into stolid predictability in the third act.

Write a one sentence summary of the reviews above.

Even though The Memory of a Killer is standard genre fare, it is also engaging and stylish.
1. ELord Of War drops the hammer slowly, laying out the fascinating parameters of Cage's world before opening up its argument in an astonishing denouement.
2. Lord of War has a surreal edge, despite being enmeshed in world events, with absurdity and dark humor laced throughout.
3. I'm beginning to get discouraged about Andrew Niccol.
4. Satire is rarely so hard-hitting, or high calibre.
5. This film fails so miserably don't be surprised to find yourself often rooting against the supposed good guy.
6. That the CIA engages in these activities with all sorts of Orlovs no doubt slithering around in the mix somewhere, is a far more intriguing huge chunk of vital information that sadly never made it to the screen.
7. A carefully choreographed devil's dance in which Nicolas Cage finds fleet-footed rejuvenation as a man aware evil can't exist without good, but that evil often wins. This uniquely unsympathetic, world-weary film earns the right to fling that truth.
8. A fine, grown-up movie, half thriller, half black comedy.
9. The movie ultimately crushes itself in a vise of self-loathing.
10. Niccol is no stranger to hot-button issues, but he outdoes his previous efforts by injecting this satire of war profiteering in the Halliburton age with a wicked arsenic wit.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

While Lord of War is an intelligent examination of the gun trade, it is too scattershot in its plotting to connect.
1. The effect isn't just frenetic, unfunny and dull. It's kind of creepy.
2. Uncle Jesse and Joey must have been too busy to make appearances. Lucky them.
3. It's a charming, zestful romp.
4. The unapologetic, no-consequence nature of the characters' activities here, as well as the constant flow of dress-them-up Barbie outfits the twins don, wallow in the worst sort of amorality and image-is- everything indulgence.
5. It's as if someone took three or four of the Adventures of Mary-Kate and Ashley videos and stitched them together in a way that is convoluted and strangely plotless.
6. Ashley and Mary-Kate are passable actors, which puts them in the same league as Hilary Duff, Amanda Bynes and Mandy Moore, but light years behind Allison Loman.
7. Just know that it never gets sitcomish enough to make adults squirm with homicidal rage, it's fun to watch and your pre-adolescent will love it.
8. Viewers likely will have more patience counting down the Olsen twins' last days of childhood than sitting through their film.
9. As coy sleaze goes, the new Olsen twins' movie doesn't match Britney Spears's Crossroads, but it comes close.
10. There are so many completely laughless stretches that this under-90-minutes feature feels considerably longer.
What is the consensus?

Feels more like a calculated product designed to expand the Olsens' brand than an actual movie. Also, it contains ethnic stereotyping and sexual innuendo.
1. It's never, ever boring. And, importantly, it knows exactly when to quit.
2. ...a sort of power-pop variation on the mystical time-bending Euro-art movies made by the late Krzysztof Kieslowski.
3. FAST, smart and fun,
4. ...the movie is a departure from the norm that will have audiences chattering well into the night...
5. Lola, played with unbounded energy in an utterly captivating performance by Franka Potente, does exactly that, run almost the entire movie.
6. this goofy, audacious, visually stylized omnibus of what-ifs that operates on its own peculiar logic, and powers along with the force of a truck on the Autobahn.
7. Compared to the alternate scenarios envisioned in Sliding Doors or Blind Chance, Run Lola Run comes across as pedestrian.
8. All the actors do perform excellently in their roles, but the star here is the director Tom Tykwer. The layering of the imagery, soundtrack, and the pacing all come together to outshine any performance by a single actor.
9. Tom Twyker's frenzied directing is never dull, and casting his girlfriend [Franka] Potente in the role was a smart choice.
10. Run Lola Run could very well be the punchiest piece of concept art to ever hit the silver screen, a shock-dose of German existential cinema you can ride.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

More fun than a barrel of Jean-Paul Sartre, pic's energy riffs on an engaging love story and really human performances while offering a series of what-ifs and a blood-stirring soundtrack.
1. Gilliam is a film artist with a grand and copious vision that he incorporates into every frame of every film like a potion.
2. The result is something that might best be called Monty Python and the Holy Mess.
3. A flawed but brilliantly imaginative mix of darkness and humor reminiscent of Hammer period chillers like Captain Kronos: Vampire Hunter by way of Monty Python and the Holy Grail.
4. This film does for fairy tales what Time Bandits did for time travel stories
5. A feast for the eyes, and often very funny.
6. Jammed with stuff and all but empty of drama.
7. The best thing to be said about this expensive but drab wannabe mirthmaker is that it has some of its director's quirky touches.
8. The film is as much about the process of creation, of spinning yarns and contexts, as it is about any particular yarns.
9. Gilliam is inspired by the sibling writers, it seems, so he could deliver a goofy comedy.
10. Magical! Wonderful! Gorgeous! Enchantment comes to life.

What is a brief summary of the following reviews?

The Brothers Grimm is full of beautiful imagery, but the story is labored and less than enchanting.
1. An entertaining film for kids and young teens.
2. [Muniz's] cute, was paid $2 million and should start pondering the career arc of Mickey Rooney.
3. The concoction doesn't taste like anything special, but a has refreshing hint of sweetness.
4. Agent Cody Banks provides the kind of high-quality entertainment one would expect in an adult action adventure that is expected to rake in major bucks.
5. Dedicated to helping kids make a transition, smoothing the way between Boy's Life readers and Maxim readers.
6. Those who aren't part of the 10- to 13-year-old target audience will probably also find it witless and derivative.
7. Unfortunately for Agent Cody Banks, someone already made a movie about spy kids, and it was called 'Spy Kids.'
8. A wasteful, if painless, diversion.
9. Although the original Spy Kids worked, Agent Cody Banks proves that things seldom taste as good a second or third time.
10. Overall, the film will probably be enjoyable for younger viewers -- especially fans of Muniz -- but otherwise isn't as successful at putting the spy kid through the teen years.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

Should satisfy young teens, but offers nothing new for those who are familiar with the formula.
Write an ordered list of reviews about "next friday".

1. Its humor batting average would earn anybody an MVP.
2. Vulgar, stupid and un-PC as it may be, this sequel to 1995's surprise hit Friday is also sporadically funny... occasionally very funny.
3. As garishly uninspired as an average UPN sitcom episode.
4. Steve Carr is on creative lockdown here.
5. Notable chiefly for feeding a stereotype of blacks as shiftless layabouts interested mainly in recreational drugs and irresponsible sex.
6. Ice Cube manages a certain bumbling charm that keeps the film churning along quite winningly for 90 minutes.
7. Next Friday's a chronic snore.
8. By the film's hollow conclusion, even Ice Cube has to acknowledge that T.G.I.F. really stands for Thank God, It's Finished.
9. While the end of the year is known for Ho, Ho, Ho, movie critics often react to the beginning of the year and its cinematic offerings with No, No, No! Next Friday is one of those films that elicits such a reaction.
10. An altered state on the part of a viewer is about the only way for this film to be considered the laugh riot of the year.
1. Through the filmmaking, and inside the film itself, the son visits the sins of the father and discovers a triumph, a legacy, a purpose.
2. Van Peebles' stiff, needlessly flashy direction lacks the energy this material required to become truly transporting, and the relationships between the characters, particularly the father and son, is never convincing.
3. Works alternately as a weird kind of biopic, a movie about moviemaking and a film about a certain era in Hollywood.
4. Effectively raw and stylish.
5. In Baadasssss! 1970s blaxploitation cinema finally has its own Day for Night.
6. The last face we see belongs to the real Melvin, who doesn't say a word -- but his fierce look confirms the story's veracity and his pride in his son.
7. It succeeds in one very important aspect: It makes you want to see the original movie that spawned it.
8. Not just forgiving toward the elder Van Peebles, it's filled with a spirit of comic amazement about what he accomplished.
9. The rousing and irresistible story of the making of the 1971 action film Sweet Sweetback's Baad Asssss Song.
10. A reminder that good intentions don't always make for good movies.
What is the consensus?

An entertaining and intriguing tribute to a father from his son.
1. Though without the charm of 'Grizzly Man' and 'March of the Penguins,' this is a fleshed-out human story of men working to protect antelopes in the Tibetan mountains.
2. Spectacularly-photographed, deeply moving tale.
3. A quiet little gem of a film that stuns with spectacular beauty, shocks with awful savagery and leaves you pondering the relationship of man and nature.
4. What is remarkable is that this film is based on a true story, and filmed on the actual locations.
5. One of the most beautiful and disturbing widescreen epics in last year's Seattle International Film Festival.
6. It's an absurdist, quixotic and sloooow journey that leads our heroes to the banal face of evil.
7. Much of the time, the movie plays like a catalog of challenges sprawled over terrain so forbidding that you can't watch it without feeling a steep measure of awe.
8. Instead of a laudable ecological crusade, the film feels more like a futile Captain Ahab obsession, with patrol leader Ri Tai (Duobujie) vainly chasing a poaching kingpin through the harsh, windy wilderness.
9. An epic story of white-knuckle tension in a setting of harsh, unearthly beauty, it's the kind of story Hemingway might have told if he'd made it to the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.
10. The film's somber beauty is recommendation enough, but the way political, personal, and symbolic tensions seethe silently below the surface turn it into riveting drama.

Write a one sentence summary of the reviews above.

In a setting both visually stunning and cruel, this Eastern film evokes the epic spirit of old-fashioned Westerns.
The critic consesnsus is: Borrowing heavily (and intelligently) from Pixar and Looney Tunes, Despicable Me is a surprisingly thoughtful, family-friendly treat with a few surprises of its own.. What reviews supported this critic consensus?

1. It looks so stylish that thinking about its plot is strictly optional.
2. When compared with the ambition and achievement of recent animated films, such as Coraline and Toy Story 3, Despicable Me hardly seems to have been worth making, and it's barely worth watching.
3. As the gentle story of a lost man who finds his humanity at the same time he discovers love can be a reciprocal emotion, Despicable Me has its heart in just the right place.
4. A spunky 3D animated feature that shows how a supervillain can follow his heart and be transformed from within.
5. First-time directors Chris Renaud and Pierre Coffin and the other filmmakers behind this slight but engaging kids' animated comedy have no ambitions to be original, but like their villainous hero, Gru, they insist on stealing only from the best.
6. Limps to a finish without ever finding a distinct identity.
7. For a film that opens with a tiresome, clichéd first half, it's a treat to watch the movie transform into something likable and exciting. Perhaps too little too late, but at least the filmmakers ultimately catch on to what's best for their feature.
8. [T]otally fresh and wildly original... [I]t feels like an act of outright anarchy for a film to give us... a story we don't already know the ending of before we even walk into the theater.
9. There is a glee to this silliness I haven't seen in an animated feature since Monsters Inc.
10. Neither as rich in story nor stunning in animation as Pixar offerings, Despicable Me instead settles for simply being goofy good fun, and it hardly seems like settling at all.
Write an ordered list of reviews about "win win 2011".

1. Some accomplished turns, and the mood of downbeat quirkiness has its appeal. Plot contrivances scupper it though, and given McCarthy's track record it's a letdown.
2. If there's a more agreeable comedy now making the rounds, please, someone, tell me about it ... easily the best film I've seen so far this year ...
3. Funny, agreeable and thoroughly enjoyable, if a little bit too neat and fortuitous in sorting out its entangled strands.
4. Trundles along for the most part in sitcom fashion, even down to the plinky-plonky background music.
5. Funny, touching, and beautifully acted, Win Win is definitely a victory in humanistic storytelling.
6. An under-the-radar breath of fresh air built on a strong cast and a smart script.
7. Writer/director Tom McCarthy's skill comes from an ability to hook you and make you care about his characters as if they are family.
8. No disrespect: this is a nice little movie
9. With this cast and these characters, even the predictable goes down very nicely indeed.
10. Another great 'family unit' film from director Thomas McCarthy and one of the best teen performances you'll see with newcomer Alex Shaffer.
Summarize the following movie reviews:

1. The tone of the film, directed by P. J. Hogan, is frothy and frivolous; the plot is glaringly predictable.
2. It's a shame eBay didn't get their hand in here, but then that would have spoiled almost two hours of light-hearted anti-capitalist sentiment from the producer of Top Gun.
3. If you want gritty realism, see an arthouse movie. Or shop in a pound store. As journalist Rebecca, Isla Fisher is silly and adorable - just like this adaptation of Sophie Kinsella's novel.
4. The problem nipping at the designer heels of Confessions is not the state of the economy but, rather, the film's predictability.
5. More Topshop than Top Gun, this Bruckheimer effort sees Fisher finally make good on her Wedding Crashers promise in a film that manages to be both a frothy romcom and a cautionary tale on the perils of plastic splurgery.
6. The conclusion is almost as predictable as the Harrods sale...even if you feel you've not quite got your money's worth. Not so much top draw as bargain basement.
7. Shopaholic is a pleasingly addictive treat. Happily, it's one that won't max out your credit card.
8. This excruciatingly bad attempt at a breezy romcom is an ill-conceived, dreadfully executed mess. Totally bereft of laughs, drama and chemistry between the leads, the movie is so nausea-inducing that it belongs in a sub genre of its own - the vomcom.
9. The whole thing is a piece of romantic codswallop that relies on the ordinary but feisty charm of Fisher.
10. This rival to the other chick flick of the moment, He's Just Not That Into You, is a fabulously frothy and fun fashion film.

This middling romantic comedy underutilizes a talented cast and delivers muddled messages on materialism and conspicuous consumption.
1. This is one film that shouldn't have been birthed. No, in fact, it should have been aborted.
2. At last we are making crappy horror films entirely on our own, without having to rip them off from Japan! U-S-A! U-S-A!
3. Goyer has penned many scripts superior to this one, but he does make sure you're never far away from a big 'Boo!'
4. 'This is the last time I'll write a movie on a roll of Charmin Ultra,' said Goyer.
5. The film's raison d'ętre is a series of shock effects involving creepy kids, dogs with upside-down heads and a CGI-powered geriatric variant on Linda Blair's crab walk.
6. Falls very much line with early-year schlock.
7. A cheesy low-rent supernatural thriller that vainly tries to introduce some gravitas by dropping references to the Kabbalah.
8. The film's story is not so much plagued by plot holes as it is constructed out of them, not unlike an especially lacy variety of Swiss cheese.
9. ...a salad of creepshow cliches...
10. Not deep or all that visually imaginative--Goyer never wavers from the usual slow build-up to a sudden fright, and the ending is all fight-and-flight, no shock-and-awe--but certainly unboring.

Write a one sentence summary of the reviews above.

David Goyer's Unborn is a tame genre effort with cheap thrills and scares that border on silliness.
Here are some reviews for a movie: 1. The film is all over the place, really. It dabbles all around, never gaining much momentum.
2. Ho hum. Another week, another grossout teen comedy.
3. The filmmakers use the fact they are making a film about underachieving as an excuse to do just that and Van Wilder, while aspiring to be Ferris Bueller, comes off more like Grange Hill's Roland Browning
4. Strangely comes off as a kingdom more mild than wild.
5. Enthusiastically taking up the current teen movie concern with bodily functions, Walt Becker's film pushes all the demographically appropriate comic buttons.
6. Its gross-out gags and colorful set pieces... are of course stultifyingly contrived and too stylized by half. Still, it gets the job done -- a sleepy afternoon rental.
7. What more can be expected from a college comedy that's target audience hasn't graduated from junior high school?
8. You'll likely hate yourself for laughing, but laugh you will.
9. While it may look like any other campus comedy at first glance, Van Wilder is actually different from the rest, with its refreshing, fun-filled and wacky script.
10. An uneven mix of National Lampoon-style high jinks (yes, it feels slightly dated) and Farrelly-brothers touches tossed in for gross measure.

What was the overall consensus about the movie?

A derivative gross-out comedy that's short on laughs.
1. A lighthearted, low-budget remake likely to work well for those capable of approaching it more as a novelty than a knockoff.
2. Not for the fainthearted, certainly, but it has an unembarassable elan that helps it avoid the pitfalls of campness and silliness.
3. Filled with shoot-outs, knife fights, amazing stuntwork and striking colours, this breathless yarn feels completely bonkers at times.
4. Some fancy setpieces here and there, and gunplay just about everywhere, but none of the principals can begin to rival the sacred trio of Eli Wallach, Lee Van Cleef and the other one.
5. It's a picture of ferocious energy and excess, consciously influenced in its plot, music and visual style by Sergio Leone's The Good, the Bad and the Ugly as well as by the Indiana Jones movies. Over-extended, but extremely enjoyable.
6. The movie raises the bar yet again for South Korean tech expertise and ambition, as well as launching the K-oater subgenre.
7. The Good, the Bad, the Weird may owe a lot to other films, but it is always fresh and never boring.
8. It's hard to knock any movie that opens with an eye-popping train robbery, followed by a balls-out siege, and then a super-cool heist.
9. This is filmmaking as rodeo ride: bruising and ultimately pointless, but thrilling as hell while it lasts.
10. Wild, crazy and packed with memorable moments, this South Korean homage to the western may not be thought-provoking or particularly deep, but it's also one of the most genuinely fun and inventive movies to hit the screen in quite some time.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

Whilst never taking itself too seriously, this riotous and rollicking Sergio Leone-inspired Korean Western is serious fun.
Which movie is the following review about?

The best of all the Disney cartoons

beauty and the beast 1991
1. While the action is good, the movie isn't as cool as it thinks. If you replace Bruce Willis with Gene Hackman, then you have a hit on your hands about these 'old' agents.
2. Much of the enjoyment comes from seeing these respected thespians so thoroughly embody cartoon characters; it's like Sidney Lumet directing Space Jam.
3. Proof, if more were needed, that the artistic collision between the aging baby boomers and their comic-book-obsessed progeny makes for some mighty strange, but not unentertaining, bedfellows.
4. One of those rare action comedies that actually delivers action and comedy, and one where the alleged humor doesn't consist merely of wisecracking heroes blowing away cardboard villains.
5. What really works for Red is our shared history with the actors involved.
6. Action sequences are just poorly shot. It feels like they took a few comic panels from the book, but you don't see the effects of a given action.
7. Retired CIA agents get dragged back into harness, and the is truth is that they couldn't be happier in this good-natured action movie spiced up with a dash each of comedy and romance...
8. You're never too old for mayhem.
9. The kicker is in the casting: Bruce Willis, Morgan Freeman, John Malkovich, Mary-Louise Parker, Brian Cox and Helen Mirren all come out to play.
10. Director Robert Schwentke does as much as he can with the cartoonish story and stunts but after a while can no longer maintain the illusion that RED is actually about anything.
What is the consensus?

It may not be the killer thrill ride you'd expect from an action movie with a cast of this caliber, but Red still thoroughly outshines most of its big-budget counterparts with its wit and style.
1. The beauty of the Dirty Harry movies isn't all the famous lines but is Clint Eastwood's wonderfully dry and threatening delivery of them.
2. Freudian's could have a field day examining the obsession that Harry has with the size of his weaponry in this flaccid police thriller
3. The fourth installment in the Dirty Harry series (7 years after the third) has the unlikely tale of Eastwood's Callahan after a murderous woman bend on revenge against the men who raped her and her sister 10 years earlier.
4. Harry starts to parody himself with this one.
5. Eastwood the star needed a hit to bolster his flagging ratings; now that he's got it, maybe Harry will be put out to stud, with his Magnum.
6. It is viewed by many aficionados as the best of the five movies about the hard-nosed, authority-defying San Francisco cop.
7. The film lags whenever Eastwood isn't on screen, but even his dryly humorous patter can't offset the very sour, mean tone of the rest of the film.
8. Sadly, Clint was still sleeping with Sandra Locke and giving her work! The worse of the "Dirty Harry" films...didn't "make my day"
9. This is the first entry in the series to have been directed by Eastwood himself, and action is put over with great force, if also with some obviousness.
10. At times like a traffic jam of different stories and characters crossing paths back and forth for almost two hours, and there isn't too much tension to go with it.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

Sudden Impact delivers all the firepower -- and the most enduring catchphrase -- fans associate with the Dirty Harry franchise, but it's far from the best film in the series.
Summarize the following movie reviews:

1. Hail to the King, baby.
2. Bubba has a couple of terrific performances and some major laughs, but it's so badly paced that at only 92 minutes it seems overlong.
3. Neither particularly funny nor scary, but tiresome.
4. In the end, what keeps it going is not the story but the delicious relationship between Elvis and JFK.
5. Coscarelli's pacing pokes along like Elvis in his walker, and the horror finale is slow and pointless.
6. Silly, but it tells us more about courage than many highly-touted movies this year, including 'Cold Mountain' and 'The Last Samurai.'
7. It gets by on a kind of demented charm.
8. It's a blast, thank you very much.
9. There's an astonishing amount of good, solid acting.
10. Bubba Ho-Tep sounds more like a hip Saturday Night Live skit. Unfortunately, it also plays like a standard SNL movie, all high concept with little story.

The best movie to star both the King and JFK.