Information has been received via the pregnancy registry, from a licensed practical nurse (LPN), concerning a 17 year old female patient with a drug hypersensitivity to ERYTHROPED (vomiting), who on 06-FEB-2007 was vaccinated IM with the first dose, 0.5 ml, of Gardasil (Lot #654389/0961F), and with the second dose of Gardasil (date not specified). The patient then had her LMP on 18-JUL-2007, and on 13-AUg-2007 was "10 days pregnant" when vaccinated with the third dose of Gardasil. There was no concomitant medication. On 03-SEP-2007, the patient visited the hospital for a foot injury, and a lab test (unspecified) confirmed she was pregnant. The estimated date of delivery was 24-APR-2008. The patient sought unspecified medical attention. Additional information has been requested. 07/08/08 Initial and follow up information has been received from a licensed practical nurse and office worker for the Merck pregnancy registry for GARDASIL, concerning a 17 year old female patient with a drug hypersensitivity to erythromycin (vomiting) and no prior pregnancies, who on 08-FEB-2007 was vaccinated IM with the first dose, 0.5 ml, of GARDASIL (Lot #654389/0961F), and on 12-APR-2007 with the second dose of GARDASIL (Lot #654389/0961F). The patient then had her LMP on 19-JUL-2007 and on 13-AUG-2007 was "10 days pregnant" when vaccinated IM with the third dose of GARDASIL (Lot #654389/0961F). There was no concomitant medication. On 03-SEP-2007, the patient visited the hospital for a foot injury, and a lab test (foot x-ray) confirmed she was pregnant. The estimated date of delivery was approximately 06-MAY-2008 (previously reported as 24-APR-2008). On 30-APR-2008, the patient delivered a normal female infant weighing 8 lbs. The patient had no complications during pregnancy or labor and delivery. The patient sought unspecified medical attention. Additional information is not expected. This is in follow-up to report(s) previously submitted on 10/8/2007. Initial and follow up information has been received via the Merck pregnancy registry, from a licensed practical nurse, concerning a 17 year old female patient with a drug hypersensitivity to ERYTHROPED (vomiting) and no prior pregnancies, whon on 08-Feb-2007 was vaccinated IM with the first dose, o.5 ml. of GARDASIL (Lot # 654389/0961P) and on 12-Apr-2007 with the second dose of GARDASIL (lot 654189/0961F). The patient then had her LMP on 19-Jul-2007, and on 13-Aug-2007 was 10 days pregnant. When vaccinated IM with the third dose of GARDASIL (Lot # 054389/0961F). There was no concomitant medication. On 03-Sep-2007 the patient visited the hospital for a foot injury, and a lab test (unspecified) confirmed she was pregnant. The estimated date of delivery was approximately 08-May-2008 (previously reported as 14-Apr-2008). The patient sought unspecified medical attention. Additional information has been requested. This is in follow-up to report(s) previously submitted on 10/8/2007; 1/7/2008; 7/8/2008. Initial and follow up information has been received from a licensed practical nurse and office worker for the Merck pregnancy registry for GARDASIL, concerning a 17 year old female patient with a drug hypersensitivity to ERYTHROPED (vomiting) and no prior pregnancies, concurrent conditions, infections or illnesses during pregnancy, who on 06-FEB-2007 was vaccinated IM with the first dose, 0.5 ml, of Gardasil (Lot #654389/0961F), and on 12-APR-2007 with the second dose of Gardasil (Lot #654389/0961F). The patient then had her LMP on 19-JUL-2007, and on 13-AUg-2007 was "10 days pregnant" when vaccinated with the third dose of Gardasil (Lot #654389/0961F). There was no concomitant medication. On 03-SEP-2007, the patient visited the hospital for a foot injury, and a lab test (foot x-ray) confirmed she was pregnant. The estimated date of delivery was approximately 08-MAY-2008 (previously reported as 24-APR-2008). On 30-APR-2008, the patient delivered a normal female infant with no congenital anomalies or complications weighing 8 lbs. The patient had no complications during pregnancy or labor and delivery. The office saw baby once but now going to another physician. The patient sought unspecified medical attention. Additional information is not expected.