COVID-19 positive; COVID-19 positive; This is a literature report for the following literature.  INTRODUCTION: Anaphylaxis is an acute, potentially life-threatening, systemic allergic reaction that presents as a multitude of manifestations after exposure to an allergen. It is rare to have an anaphylactic reaction to the SARS-Cov-2 vaccine, however, the authors present a patient who had a prolonged anaphylactic reaction to the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself. CASE PRESENTATION: A 23-year-old female with past medical history of chronic idiopathic urticaria and dermatographism presented with fatigue, rash, rhinitis, and lip swelling in the setting of being COVID-19 positive. She had received two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine nine months prior without any adverse affects. During the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant surge, the patient was exposed to a family member who had contracted COVID-19 infection. Two days prior to presentation, she started having a diffuse rash throughout her body. In the Emergency Department, she was given IM epinephrine x2, IV Solu-Medrol and IV Benadryl with temporary improvement in her symptoms. She developed hypotension that required initiation of a continuous epinephrine infusion and was admitted to the Medical Intensive Care Unit. Each time the epinephrine was held, generalized urticaria recurred and she would become hypotensive with her systolic blood pressure decreasing below 80 mmHg. The urticaria completely resolved and her blood pressure improved when the epinephrine infusion was restarted. The patient was treated with remdesivir, Solu-Medrol, loratadine, and famotidine. She was able to be weaned off the epinephrine infusion over the course of four days. Immunological workup was unremarkable apart from elevation of IL-10 on her cytokine panel. DISCUSSION: The symptoms and syndromes associated with COVID-19 infection remain diverse and while urticaria has been a documented manifestation of the virus, it is uncommon. There is a single case report of an anaphylactic reaction in response to COVID-19. Given the patient's symptoms were temporally related to the COVID-19 infection, the authors believe the SARS-COV-2 virus was the trigger. She did not have any other exposure during this time. This case is unique in that the virus not only triggered the urticaria, but that her symptoms persisted for four days. After receiving antiviral therapy plus steroids and antihistamines, her symptoms finally resolved. The SARS-COV-2 virus itself is primarily attacked by immune cells, including mast cells, which release an array of proinflammatory cytokines. The authors postulate that in the patient, her history of chronic urticaria predisposed her to an exaggerated inflammatory response. CONCLUSION(S): SARS-CoV-2 has clinically presented itself in a multitude of ways across many disciplines. In a patient with a history of urticaria, prolonged anaphylactic symptoms can be triggered by the virus itself.   No follow-up attempts are possible; information about lot/batch number cannot be obtained. No further information is expected.; Sender's Comments: Based on possible temporal association the causal role of BNT162B2 Vaccine cannot be excluded for reported events  Drug ineffective and Covid -19. Case will be reviewed further on receipt of FU information