chrisvoncsefalvay/vaers-narrative-generation huggingface dataset:
Sex: F
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Pain, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: suspected vaccination failure; shingles; very painful; This case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a female patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant), shingles and pain. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure, shingles and pain were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure, shingles and pain to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were provided as follows: The patient was the reporter's sister. The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient got the shingle shot and still got shingles that were very painful. The reporter stated that vaccines weren't a cure. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure since the details regarding completion of primary immunization schedule, time to onset and laboratory test confirming shingles were unknown at the time of reporting.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: suspected vaccination failure; shingles; This case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, 11 months after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure and shingles were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were provided as follows The patient had reported for him/herself. The age at vaccination was not reported. After receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient got shingles. The patient stated that, the shingles were very contagious. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure, since the details regarding the completion of the primary immunization and laboratory confirmation were not provided.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Pain, Rash
Clinical narrative: got a terrible rash; pain even a month later I still have pain; This case was reported by a consumer and described the occurrence of rash in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received the 1st dose of Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced rash and pain. On an unknown date, the outcome of the rash and pain were recovered/resolved.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the rash and pain to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were provided as follows: The case was reported by the patient for herself/himself. The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient reported that, he/she had the shot of Shingles vaccine and still got a terrible rash and pain. For the tolerance of the 2nd dose, refer case US2021AMR175260, reported by the same reporter.; Sender's Comments:  US-GLAXOSMITHKLINE-US2021AMR175260:Same reporter
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Condition aggravated, Pain, Rash, Vaccine positive rechallenge
Clinical narrative: got a terrible rash; pain even a month later I still have pain; This case was reported by a consumer and described the occurrence of rash in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   Previously administered products included Shingles vaccine with an associated reaction of rash (1st dose received on an unknown date and experienced terrible rash and pain, refer case US2021AMR175232).   On an unknown date, the patient received the 2nd dose of Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, less than 2 months after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced rash and pain. Rechallenge with Shingles vaccine was positive. On an unknown date, the outcome of the rash was unknown and the outcome of the pain was not recovered/not resolved.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the rash and pain to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were provided as follows: The case was reported by the patient for herself/himself. The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient reported that, he/she had the shots of Shingles vaccine and still got a terrible rash and pain even a month later the patient still had pain.; Sender's Comments:  US-GLAXOSMITHKLINE-US2021AMR175232:Same reporter
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Pain, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: had Shingles vaccinations and developed / full blown Shingles/suspected vaccination failure; Full blown shingles; Painful; This case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant), shingles and pain. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure, shingles and pain were unknown.  It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure,shingles and pain to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were reported as follows: The case was reported by the patient. The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient had Shingles vaccinations and developed the most horrific painful case of full blown Shingles. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure, since the details regarding the completion of the primary immunization, time to onset for event and laboratory test confirming shingles were not provided.
Sex: M
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Nerve injury, Rash vesicular, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: got the shot,/got the worst case of shingles/suspected vaccination failure; worst case of shingles/ little pox popping up; Nerve damage; little pox popping up; This case was reported by a consumer via media and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a male patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, 2 years after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant), shingles, nerve damage and vesicular rash. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure, shingles and vesicular rash were unknown and the outcome of the nerve damage was not recovered/not resolved.  It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure, shingles, nerve damage and vesicular rash to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were reported as follows: This case was reported by the wife for his husband. The age at vaccination was not reported. Two years after vaccination, the patient got the worst case of shingles ever, now he had nerve damage. The patient after years still had little pox popping up on him. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure, since the details regarding the completion of the primary immunization, time to onset for event and laboratory test confirming shingles were not provided.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS, VARZOS
Symptoms: Condition aggravated, Herpes zoster, Pain, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: got the shots. / got the shingles again / had the 2 shots/ Suspected Vaccination failure; shingles; painful; This case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media  and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   Co-suspect products included Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   The patient's past medical history included shingles.   On an unknown date, the patient received the 2nd dose of Shingles vaccine and the 1st dose of Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, less than 2 years after receiving Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant), shingles and pain. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure, shingles and pain were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure, shingles and pain to be related to Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were reported as follows: The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient got the shots last year. The patient had the Shingles twice. The patient had Shingles again and this time it was very painful. So the reporter asked did the shots not work, they did not work for him/her.  The patient got 2 shingles shots and he or she got the Shingles again just this week from date of reporting. The patient said unreal. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding, time to onset for target disease and laboratory confirmation were unknown at the time of reporting.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Incorrect dose administered, Product preparation issue
Clinical narrative: Patient only injected with adjuvant; Patient only injected with adjuvant; This case was reported by a other health professional and described the occurrence of inappropriate preparation of medication in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingrix) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingrix. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingrix, the patient experienced inappropriate preparation of medication and inappropriate dose of vaccine administered. On an unknown date, the outcome of the inappropriate preparation of medication and inappropriate dose of vaccine administered were unknown.  Additional details were provided as follows: The age at vaccination was not reported. The reporter stated that, looking for the correct procedure to follow if a patient was inadvertently only injected with the adjuvant for the Shingrix vaccine, which led to inappropriate preparation of medication and inappropriate dose of vaccine administered.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: many people have gotten this so-called shot  / got the shingles/ suspected vaccination failure; shingles; This case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in an unspecified number of patients who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure and shingles were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were reported as follows: The age at vaccination was not applicable for this report. The reporter stated that the comments all up and down this post indicate that many people had gotten this so-called shot and still got the shingles. The follow-up would not possible as no contact details were available. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule, time to onset and laboratory test confirming shingles were unknown at the time of reporting. This case had been linked with US2021AMR175874, reported by same reporter.; Sender's Comments:  US-GLAXOSMITHKLINE-US2021AMR175874:same reporter
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS, VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: I got shingles's vaccine/shingles's/suspected vaccination failure; shingles's; This case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   Co-suspect products included Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received the 1st dose of Shingles vaccine and the 2nd dose of Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure and shingles were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were reported as follows: This case was reported by patient himself/herself. The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient received 1st dose of Shingles vaccine and that hurt bad, refer case US2021AMR175889. The patient stated that the 2nd dose was like charm shingles. The follow-up would not possible as no contact details were available. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding time to onset and laboratory test confirming shingles were unknown at the time of reporting.; Sender's Comments:  US-GLAXOSMITHKLINE-US2021AMR175889:Same reporter
Sex: M
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Death, Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: got it and he has since passed away; had the shingles vaccine and got /suspected vaccination failure; got it and he has since passed away; This case was reported by a consumer via media and described the occurrence of death nos in a male patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced death nos (serious criteria death and GSK medically significant), vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles. On an unknown date, the outcome of the death nos was fatal and the outcome of the vaccination failure and shingles were unknown. The reported cause of death was unknown cause of death.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the death nos, vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were reported as follows: This case was reported by patient's wife. The age at vaccination was not reported. The reporter stated that the patient had the shingles vaccine and got shingles a few years ago from the date of reporting and he had since passed away. The patient's shingles was much worse and the were told that it would be much worse if they had not had vaccine. The reporter stated that anayone should not think that her or she was 100 percent safe. The reporter further stated that she still agreed to get vaccine. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule, time to onset and laboratory test confirming shingles were unknown at the time of reporting. The follow-up would not possible as no contact details were available. This case had been linked with US2021AMR175880, reported by same reporter.; Sender's Comments:  US-GLAXOSMITHKLINE-US2021AMR175880:same reporter; Reported Cause(s) of Death: Unknown cause of death
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: Suspected Vaccination Failure; I´ve had shingles 3 times since I got the vaccine; This case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media  and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure and shingles were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were provided as follows: The patient self reported the case. The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient had shingles 3 times since from vaccination and these were always at the same place, on his/her back. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure, since the details regarding the completion of vaccination schedule, the time to onset for event and laboratory confirmation for herpes zoster were not provided
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Condition aggravated, Herpes zoster, Pain, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: Suspected vaccination failure; Got the shingles; Severe pain because they could not break out of the skin; This case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   The patient's past medical history included shingles.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant), shingles and pain. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure and shingles were unknown and the outcome of the pain was recovered/resolved.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure, shingles and pain to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were provided as follows: The patient self reported the case. The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient had the vaccine and got the shingles. The patient stated that, the vaccine made shingles worst and the patient was in severe pain 24 by 7 for over 6 weeks. As per the patient, because the vaccine made it to where shingles could not break out of the skin therefore made it so pain than the times before the vaccine and due to this, the patient had to go to ER (emergency room) twice and doctors. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure, since the details regarding the completion of vaccination schedule, the time to onset for event and laboratory confirmation for herpes zoster were not provided.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: got the vaccine /, shingles, / suspected vaccination failure; shingles; This case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, 4 years after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure and shingles were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional case details were reported as follows: The patient reported case for himself or herself. The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient got the vaccine and four years later, shingles, however case was lessened. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure, as details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule, laboratory test confirmation and time to onset for shingles were unknown at the time of reporting. The follow up was not required.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Pain, Vaccine positive rechallenge
Clinical narrative: Getting two shingle shot hurted like hell / pain for 4 days from it; This case was reported by a consumer and described the occurrence of general body pain in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   Previously administered products included Shingles vaccine with an associated reaction of pain (1st dose received on an unknown date and experienced body pain, for tolerance of 1st dose refer case US2021AMR175894).   On an unknown date, the patient received the 2nd dose of Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, less than a week after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced general body pain. Rechallenge with Shingles vaccine was positive. On an unknown date, the outcome of the general body pain was recovered/resolved.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the general body pain to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were provided as follows: The case was reported by the consumer for herself/himself. The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient reported that, he/she received shingle shot, hurt like hell and his/her body was in pain for 4 days from it.; Sender's Comments:  US-GLAXOSMITHKLINE-US2021AMR175894:same patient, same reporter, same suspect
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: I had shingles after the shot / Suspected Vaccination Failure; I had shingles after the shot; This case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure and shingles were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional case details were reported as follows: The patient reported case for himself or herself. The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient had shingles after the shot a light case but that was bad enough. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure, as details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule, laboratory test confirmation and time to onset for shingles were unknown at the time of reporting. The follow up was not required.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Rash, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: got the shingles shot and breaking out bumps ever since / suspected vaccination failure; breaking out bumps ever since; This case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media (facebook) and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure and shingles were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional case details were reported as follows: The patient reported case for herself or himself. The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient got the shingles shot and have had breaking out bumps ever since. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure, as details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule, laboratory test confirmation and time to onset for shingles were unknown at the time of reporting. The follow up was not required.
Sex: M
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Ophthalmic herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: My X husband got the Shingles Vaccine and got them in his eyes / Suspected Vaccination Failure; My X husband got the Shingles Vaccine and got them in his eyes; This case was reported by a consumer via media and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a male patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and ophthalmic herpes zoster (serious criteria GSK medically significant). On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure and ophthalmic herpes zoster were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and ophthalmic herpes zoster to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional case details were reported as follows: The age at vaccination was not reported. The reporter was patient's wife. The patient got the Shingles vaccine and got them in his eye. Now he has to go once a month to get an injection in his eye. The follow up was not required. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure, as details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule, laboratory test confirmation and time to onset for shingles were unknown at the time of reporting.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene mutation, Dehydration, Illness, Near death experience, Non-small cell lung cancer stage IV
Clinical narrative: Almost died with septic shock; NSCLC stage 4 with Alk mutation; Sick; Dehydrated; This case was reported by a consumer via media and described the occurrence of septic shock in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   Co-suspect products included metformin for diabetes.   Concurrent medical conditions included diabetes.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine and metformin at an unknown dose and frequency. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced septic shock (serious criteria GSK medically significant and life threatening), non-small cell lung cancer (serious criteria GSK medically significant), sickness and dehydration. The action taken with metformin was unknown. On an unknown date, the outcome of the septic shock, non-small cell lung cancer, sickness and dehydration were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the septic shock, non-small cell lung cancer and dehydration to be related to Shingles vaccine. The reporter considered the sickness to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional case details were reported as follows: The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient reported case for himself or herself. After vaccination patient was sick. The patient was dehydrated and was on Metformin for diabetes. The patient was almost died with septic shock due to metformin toxicity. Less than 3 months later patient was diagnosed with NSCLC (Non-small cell lung cancer) stage 4 with Alk mutation. The physician never warned the patient of the dangers and informed be careful, it could cost your life As the hospital physician said, it was the perfect storm. The patient still struggle with health yet. It was unknown if the reporter considered the septic shock, non-small cell lung cancer and dehydration to be related to Metformin. The follow up was not required.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Septic shock, Toxicity to various agents
Clinical narrative: Almost died with septic shock; NSCLC stage 4 with Alk mutation; Sick; Dehydrated; This case was reported by a consumer via media and described the occurrence of septic shock in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   Co-suspect products included metformin for diabetes.   Concurrent medical conditions included diabetes.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine and metformin at an unknown dose and frequency. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced septic shock (serious criteria GSK medically significant and life threatening), non-small cell lung cancer (serious criteria GSK medically significant), sickness and dehydration. The action taken with metformin was unknown. On an unknown date, the outcome of the septic shock, non-small cell lung cancer, sickness and dehydration were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the septic shock, non-small cell lung cancer and dehydration to be related to Shingles vaccine. The reporter considered the sickness to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional case details were reported as follows: The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient reported case for himself or herself. After vaccination patient was sick. The patient was dehydrated and was on Metformin for diabetes. The patient was almost died with septic shock due to metformin toxicity. Less than 3 months later patient was diagnosed with NSCLC (Non-small cell lung cancer) stage 4 with Alk mutation. The physician never warned the patient of the dangers and informed be careful, it could cost your life As the hospital physician said, it was the perfect storm. The patient still struggle with health yet. It was unknown if the reporter considered the septic shock, non-small cell lung cancer and dehydration to be related to Metformin. The follow up was not required.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS, VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: had both vaccinations/ got shingles /suspected vaccination failure; shingles; This case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   Co-suspect products included Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received the 2nd dose of Shingles vaccine and the 1st dose of Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure and shingles were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were provided as follows: The reporter was the patient. The age at vaccination was not reported. The reporter stated that, vaccinated with both shingles shot in a 6 months period and got a mild case of shingles. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure, since the details regarding the time to onset for event and laboratory confirmation for shingles were not provided. This case was linked with the case US2021AMR088532.; Sender's Comments:  US-GLAXOSMITHKLINE-US2021AMR088532:comment response
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS, VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: you took two shots and I still got them / Suspected Vaccination failure; got them; This case was reported by a consumer via social media interactive digital media and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   Co-suspect products included Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   Previously administered products included Shingles vaccine (received years before the date of reporting).   On an unknown date, the patient received the 2nd dose of Shingles vaccine and the 1st dose of Shingles vaccine. In March 2021, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure and shingles were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were provided as follows: The reporter was the patient. The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient received shingle shot years ago, then had them again many years later when they took two shingles shots and still got shingles this past March. The patient took every precaution and still get shingles. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure, since the details regarding the time to onset for event and laboratory confirmation for shingles were not provided.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS, VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: I get the vaccinations. Last one was less than a year ago. I have shingles now /suspected vaccination failure; shingles; This case was reported by a consumer via  interactive digital media and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a adult patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   Co-suspect products included Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for an unknown indication.   On an unknown date, the patient received the 2nd dose of Shingles vaccine and the 1st dose of Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, less than a year after receiving Shingles vaccine and unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure and shingles were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were provided as follows: The reporter was the patient. The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient received last dose of shingles less than a year ago and had shingles now for 3rd time in adult life. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure, since the details regarding the time to onset for event and laboratory confirmation for shingles were not provided.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Chills, Nausea
Clinical narrative: I had chills; Nausea; This case was reported by a consumer and described the occurrence of chills in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On 14th August 2021, the patient received the 1st dose of Shingles vaccine. In August 2021, less than a week after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced chills and nausea. On an unknown date, the outcome of the chills and nausea were unknown.  It was unknown if the reporter considered the chills and nausea to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were reported as follows: This case was reported by the patient. The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient got the shingles shot this past Saturday. The patient experienced chills and some nausea. Rather have the side effects than to have Shingles. Also stated that would get second shot.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Pain, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: i got them on my side about 3 years after getting the shot /Suspected Vaccination Failure; i got them on my side about 3 years after getting the shot; was painful enough.; This case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, 3 years after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant), shingles and pain. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure, shingles and pain were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure, shingles and pain to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were provided as follows: The reporter was the patient. The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient got shingles on his/her side about 3 years after getting the Shingles shot and that was painful enough. The follow-up would not possible as no contact details were available. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure, since the details regarding the completion of the primary immunization for shingles, time to onset for event and laboratory confirmation for shingles were not provided.
Age: 30.0
Sex: F
Vaccine: COVID19
Symptoms: Erythema, Pruritus, Urticaria
Clinical narrative: Severe itching all over body & when scratched causing red marks & hives. The itching started approximately an hour & a half after getting the shot
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Pain, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: Had the vaccine....got it anyway... sound familiar /Suspected Vaccination Failure; Had the vaccine....got it anyway... sound familiar; They are extremely painful..; This case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant), shingles and pain. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure, shingles and pain were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure, shingles and pain to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were provided as follows: The reporter was the patient. The age at vaccination was not reported. The reporter stated that, got shingles after vaccination with shingles vaccine. The shingles were extremely painful. The follow-up would not possible as no contact details were available. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure, since the details regarding the completion of the primary immunization for shingles, time to onset for event and laboratory confirmation for shingles were not provided.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Ophthalmic herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: Had shot got shingles in my eye/Suspected Vaccination Failure; Had shot got shingles in my eye; This case was reported by a consumer via media and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and ophthalmic herpes zoster (serious criteria GSK medically significant). On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure and ophthalmic herpes zoster were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and ophthalmic herpes zoster to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were provided as follows: The case was reported by the patient. The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient received shingle shot and got shingles in eye. This case was considered to be a suspected vaccination failure case, as the details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule, time to onset and laboratory confirmation for shingles were unknown. The follow up would not be possible as no contact details were available.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Rash, Thrombosis
Clinical narrative: blood clot; rash; This case was reported by a consumer via media and described the occurrence of clot blood in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received the 1st dose of Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced clot blood (serious criteria GSK medically significant and life threatening) and rash. On an unknown date, the outcome of the clot blood and rash were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the clot blood and rash to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were provided as follows: The case was reported by patient's friend. The age at vaccination was not reported. The reporter stated that be careful with shingles vaccine if you choose to get it due to horrible side effects. The reporter's friend developed life threating blood clot and horrible rash with the first shot.; Sender's Comments:  US-GLAXOSMITHKLINE-US2021AMR176000:same reporter
Sex: F
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: worst case of shingles and she took the vaccine/suspected vaccination failure; worst case of shingles; This case was reported by a consumer and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a female patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure and shingles were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were reported as follows: The case was reported by the patient's relative. The age at vaccination was not reported. The reporter's mother in law had the worst case of shingles and the patient took the vaccine. The reporter said that she/he would not be taking shingles vaccine. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule, time to onset and laboratory confirmation were unknown at the time of reporting. No contact details were available.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: got the vaccine and have had them/suspected vaccination failure; had them 5 times; This case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure and shingles were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were reported as follows: The reporter was the concerned patient. The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient had got the vaccine and had shingles 5 times since the vaccination.  The reporter also said shingles vaccine did not help everyone. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule, time to onset and laboratory test confirmation were unknown at the time of reporting. No contact details were available.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS, VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: I've had the first vaccination AND the second vaccination /had /suspected vaccination failure; I had shingles twice; This case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   Co-suspect products included Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received the 2nd dose of Shingles vaccine and the 1st dose of Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure and shingles were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were reported as follows: The case was reported by the patient. The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient had the 1st vaccination and the 2nd vaccination with the booster and still had shingles twice this year.  The patient kept the oral medicine on hand so that, the patient could start taking it as soon as feel an outbreak coming on. If the patient catch it early, it would not get out of control or last as long.  The patient was disappointed that the vaccinations had not kept the patient from an outbreak. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding time to onset and laboratory test confirming shingles were unknown at the time of reporting. No contact details were available.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS, VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: Suspected Vaccination Failure; have had shingles twice and I have been vaccinated twice; This case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   Co-suspect products included Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received the 1st dose of Shingles vaccine and the 2nd dose of Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure and shingles were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were provided as follows: The patient self reported the case. The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient had shingles twice and the patient had been vaccinated twice. The patient asked what should they have to make this commercial. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure, since the details regarding the time to onset for event and laboratory confirmation for influenza were not provided.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: Suspected vaccination failure; got the shot and then got shingles; This case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media  and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles. On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure and shingles were unknown.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were provided as follows: The age at vaccination was not reported. The reporter knew the patient, who got the shot and then got shingles. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure, since the details regarding the completion of primary immunization for shingles, time to onset for event and laboratory confirmation for herpes zoster were not provided.
Sex: M
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Death, Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: Suspected vaccination failure; Shingles, it killed him; This case was reported by a consumer via media and described the occurrence of suspected vaccination failure in a male patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, unknown after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles (serious criteria death). On an unknown date, the outcome of the vaccination failure was unknown and the outcome of the shingles was fatal. The reported cause of death was shingles.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.  Additional details were provided as follows: The patient's son/ daughter reported the case. The age at vaccination was not reported. The patient got the shot and then had shingles. These were so bad that, it killed the patient. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure, since the details regarding the completion of the primary immunization for shingles, the time to onset for event and laboratory confirmation for herpes zoster were not provided.; Reported Cause(s) of Death: shingles