chrisvoncsefalvay/vaers-narrative-generation huggingface dataset:
Sex: M
Vaccine: DTAPHEPBIP
Symptoms: Injection site discharge
Clinical narrative: After visit mom came to this NP and advised of incomplete vaccine administration, mom said after MA administered vaccine child had a "nickel sized" area of clear fluid on thigh after vaccine that was wiped with alcohol swab and MA made a comment about baby having "thick skin". Mom questioned validity of vaccine and how much was given. Would baby be covered?  Questioned MA who said that baby had "thick skin", she denied anything on skin after vaccine, said she wiped leg with alcohol, went to put in needle and there was a small drip on top of thigh before needle went through the skin, because it was "thick". She denied anything on skin after vaccine.  Disc with mom and will revaccinate , on another day, in next few wks, with another dose of Pediarix (at no chg) to be sure baby is covered for these diseases.  Family has opted for a modified vaccine schedule.  Will be back next wk for weight check.  Checked with mom today, 3/7/24 , and baby seems fine.
Age: 49.0
Sex: F
Vaccine: COVID19
Symptoms: Arthralgia, Autoimmune thyroid disorder, Blood cholesterol increased, Brain fog, Cardiovascular disorder
Clinical narrative: Two days after the vaccine, I started to profusely, vomit, extreme pain throughout my body, migraine, extreme fatigue, high blood pressure and heart palpitations. I went to the urgent care twice, and the emergency room once.  All told me that the vaccines were safe and there was no way I could have a reaction. It is almost 3 years since my injury. I am still suffering today I was at the height of my career and lost my job due to Covid vaccine injury. I have not been able to work coming up on three years, I can?t get approved for disability as well. This is totally destroyed and devastated my life. I have no confidence in the government medical agencies. I reported all of this and even left a message for the reporting that came through on my phone initially after the vaccine injury.
Age: 49.0
Sex: F
Vaccine: COVID19
Symptoms: Disturbance in attention, Endocrine disorder, Fatigue, Gastrointestinal disorder, Headache
Clinical narrative: Two days after the vaccine, I started to profusely, vomit, extreme pain throughout my body, migraine, extreme fatigue, high blood pressure and heart palpitations. I went to the urgent care twice, and the emergency room once.  All told me that the vaccines were safe and there was no way I could have a reaction. It is almost 3 years since my injury. I am still suffering today I was at the height of my career and lost my job due to Covid vaccine injury. I have not been able to work coming up on three years, I can?t get approved for disability as well. This is totally destroyed and devastated my life. I have no confidence in the government medical agencies. I reported all of this and even left a message for the reporting that came through on my phone initially after the vaccine injury.
Age: 49.0
Sex: F
Vaccine: COVID19
Symptoms: Hypertension, Impaired work ability, Injury, Laboratory test, Loss of employment
Clinical narrative: Two days after the vaccine, I started to profusely, vomit, extreme pain throughout my body, migraine, extreme fatigue, high blood pressure and heart palpitations. I went to the urgent care twice, and the emergency room once.  All told me that the vaccines were safe and there was no way I could have a reaction. It is almost 3 years since my injury. I am still suffering today I was at the height of my career and lost my job due to Covid vaccine injury. I have not been able to work coming up on three years, I can?t get approved for disability as well. This is totally destroyed and devastated my life. I have no confidence in the government medical agencies. I reported all of this and even left a message for the reporting that came through on my phone initially after the vaccine injury.
Age: 49.0
Sex: F
Vaccine: COVID19
Symptoms: Loss of personal independence in daily activities, Memory impairment, Migraine, Myalgia, Nausea
Clinical narrative: Two days after the vaccine, I started to profusely, vomit, extreme pain throughout my body, migraine, extreme fatigue, high blood pressure and heart palpitations. I went to the urgent care twice, and the emergency room once.  All told me that the vaccines were safe and there was no way I could have a reaction. It is almost 3 years since my injury. I am still suffering today I was at the height of my career and lost my job due to Covid vaccine injury. I have not been able to work coming up on three years, I can?t get approved for disability as well. This is totally destroyed and devastated my life. I have no confidence in the government medical agencies. I reported all of this and even left a message for the reporting that came through on my phone initially after the vaccine injury.
Age: 49.0
Sex: F
Vaccine: COVID19
Symptoms: Pain, Palpitations, Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, Renal disorder, Vomiting
Clinical narrative: Two days after the vaccine, I started to profusely, vomit, extreme pain throughout my body, migraine, extreme fatigue, high blood pressure and heart palpitations. I went to the urgent care twice, and the emergency room once.  All told me that the vaccines were safe and there was no way I could have a reaction. It is almost 3 years since my injury. I am still suffering today I was at the height of my career and lost my job due to Covid vaccine injury. I have not been able to work coming up on three years, I can?t get approved for disability as well. This is totally destroyed and devastated my life. I have no confidence in the government medical agencies. I reported all of this and even left a message for the reporting that came through on my phone initially after the vaccine injury.
Age: 80.0
Sex: M
Vaccine: COVID19, COVID19, COVID19
Symptoms: Biopsy prostate, COVID-19, Gleason grading score, Imaging procedure, Laboratory test
Clinical narrative: PFIZER #1 3/5/2021 PFIZER #2 3/26/2021 PFIZER #312/15/2021 IN 2022 DEVELOPED RISING PSA AND IN 2023 DIAGNOSED WITH WIDELY METASTATIC GLEASON GRADE 9 PROSTATE CANCER.   JANUARY 2024 DEVELOPED SEVERE COVID-19 ILLNESS REQUIRING HOSPITALIZATION TREATED SUCCESSFULLY WITH IVERMECTIN BASED MULTIDRUG THERAPY.  SEEKING ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER CARE CURRENTLY.  PATIENT IS CONCERNED HE HAS "TURBO CANCER" ASSOCIATED WITH COVID-19 VACCINATION.
Age: 80.0
Sex: M
Vaccine: COVID19, COVID19, COVID19
Symptoms: Magnetic resonance imaging, Prostate cancer metastatic, Prostatic specific antigen increased, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: PFIZER #1 3/5/2021 PFIZER #2 3/26/2021 PFIZER #312/15/2021 IN 2022 DEVELOPED RISING PSA AND IN 2023 DIAGNOSED WITH WIDELY METASTATIC GLEASON GRADE 9 PROSTATE CANCER.   JANUARY 2024 DEVELOPED SEVERE COVID-19 ILLNESS REQUIRING HOSPITALIZATION TREATED SUCCESSFULLY WITH IVERMECTIN BASED MULTIDRUG THERAPY.  SEEKING ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER CARE CURRENTLY.  PATIENT IS CONCERNED HE HAS "TURBO CANCER" ASSOCIATED WITH COVID-19 VACCINATION.
Age: 4.0
Sex: F
Vaccine: DTAPIPV, MMRV
Symptoms: Erythema, Induration
Clinical narrative: redness and big hard circle around .
Age: 12.0
Sex: M
Vaccine: MNQ, TDAP
Symptoms: Injection site erythema, Injection site induration, Injection site pain, Injection site swelling, Injection site warmth
Clinical narrative: Same evening of the inyection the left deltoid area turned red. Next day was swollen and firm, more red. Kept being swollen and reddish, warm to touch and tender. Made appointment since lesion was not improving. No paresthesias, no discharge.
Age: 38.0
Sex: F
Vaccine: PNC20
Symptoms: Injection site erythema, Injection site swelling, Injection site warmth
Clinical narrative: Hot, red, swollen injection site reaction that did not appear until almost a week later. Looked to spread down the arm slightly as well.
Age: 0.75
Sex: F
Vaccine: RV5
Symptoms: Product administered to patient of inappropriate age
Clinical narrative: Rota Teq given after vaccine cut off.
Age: 11.0
Sex: U
Vaccine: HPV9
Symptoms: No adverse event, Product storage error
Clinical narrative: No further AE information.; HBP called to report a TE. HBP reports that on an unspecified date, 1 dose was given to one patient/time frame 77 hours 54 minutes and 0 seconds; This spontaneous report was received from a healthcare business partner (HBP) referring to a 11-year-old patient. The patient's pertinent medical history and drug reactions/ allergies and concomitant medication were not reported.   On 11-JAN-2024, the patients were vaccinated with 1 dose of hpv rl1 6 11 16 18 31 33 45 52 58 vlp vaccine (yeast) (GARDASIL 9) injection, lot #W014479, expiration date: 16-DEC-2024, administered for prophylaxis (strength, anatomical location and route of administration were not provided) following a temperature excursion (the temperature was  minus 0.8 degree Celsius (°C), time frame was 77 hours 54 minutes and 0 seconds, no previous temperature excursion) (product storage error). No additional/further adverse event (AE) information was reported (no adverse event).
Sex: U
Vaccine: MMRV
Symptoms: No adverse event, Product storage error
Clinical narrative: No additional AE reported.; Nurse reported PROQUAD was administered after a temperature excursion to one patient. Date of administration was 28-FEB-2024. Nurse stated the patient has no reported any adverse events. No further information provided. Cross reference AE case: 02561; This spontaneous report was received from a nurse referring to a patient with unknown age and gender. The patient's pertinent medical history and drug reactions/ allergies and concomitant medication were not reported.   On 28-FEB-2024, the patients were vaccinated with measles, mumps, rubella and varicella (oka-merck) virus vaccine live (PROQUAD) injection, therapy type: rHA, once, lot #X023598, expiration date: 24-MAR-2025, administered for prophylaxis (strength, exact dose, anatomical location and route of administration were not provided) following a temperature excursion (the temperature was minus 14.5 degree Celsius (°C), time frame was 20 minutes, previous temperature excursion: 5.1°C for 3 hours ) (product storage error). Nurse stated the patient had no reported any adverse events. No additional adverse event (AE) information was reported (no adverse event).; Sender's Comments:  US-009507513-2403USA000731:
Sex: U
Vaccine: RV5
Symptoms: No adverse event, Product storage error
Clinical narrative: No symptomatic adverse events were reported / No additional AE; The patient was inadvertently administered ROTATEQ that was involved in a supported below range TE; This spontaneous report was received from a nurse, concerning a patient of unknown age and gender.  The patient's medical history, concurrent conditions, historical drugs, and concomitant therapies were not reported.  On 01-MAR-2024, the patient was inadvertently vaccinated with rotavirus vaccine, live, oral, pentavalent (ROTATEQ) oral liquid, that was involved in a supported below range temperature excursion (TE); dose: 2 milliliter (ml); lot number 1968393 was verified to be valid, expiration date reported and confirmed as 24-MAY-2024; administered orally as prophylaxis by a healtcare professional (HCP). The vaccine administered underwent a TE of -2.2 degree Celsius (C) for a time frame of 1h 3min and did not had previous temperature excursion.  No symptomatic adverse events nor additional information were reported.
Age: 65.0
Sex: F
Vaccine: COVID19, PPV, TDAP
Symptoms: Ageusia, Anosmia, Headache, Pyrexia, Unresponsive to stimuli
Clinical narrative: Unresponsive to stimuli; Anosmia; Ageusia; Pyrexia; Headache; This spontaneous report was received from a consumer/non-healthcare professional via other company and referred to a 65-year-old female unpregnant patient. The patient's concurrent conditions included hypertension, renal disorder, bladder disorder,  blood cholesterol increased. Concomitant medications included atenolol (TENOLOL), furosemide, phenobarbital, amitriptyline and trifluoperazine. The patient's medical history was not reported. The patient's medical history and historical conditions were not reported.  On 06-NOV-2023, the patient was vaccinated with unknown dose of pneumococcal 23v polysaccharide vaccine (PNEUMOVAX23) injection at left arm for prophylactic vaccination (immunization) (strength, dose, lot #, expiry date, and route of administration were not provided); 1 dose of diphtheria vaccine toxoid, pertussis vaccine acellular 5-component, tetanus vaccine toxoid (ADACEL) suspension for injection, dose 1, administered intramuscularly at right arm for prophylactic vaccination (immunization) (lot #25A2F, strength, dose, and expiry date were not provided); and 1 dose of covid-19 vaccine prot. subunit (nvx cov 2373) (NOVAVAX COVID-19 VACCINE), 0.5 milliliter, administered at left arm for corona virus disease (COVID)-19 immunisation (strength, formulation, lot #, expiry date, and route of administration were not provided).  On the same day, the patient experienced unresponsive to stimuli, anosmia, ageusia, pyrexia, headache. The outcome of all events was reported as recovered. It was not reported if the patient received a corrective treatment for all events. The action taken with covid-19 vaccine prot. subunit (nvx cov 2373) (NOVAVAX COVID-19 VACCINE), diphtheria vaccine toxoid, pertussis vaccine acellular 5-component, tetanus vaccine toxoid (ADACEL), pneumococcal 23v polysaccharide vaccine (PNEUMOVAX23) was not applicable. The causal relationship between all events regarding pneumococcal 23v polysaccharide vaccine (PNEUMOVAX23) was not reported. The causal relationship between all events regarding pneumococcal 23v polysaccharide vaccine (PNEUMOVAX23), diphtheria vaccine toxoid, pertussis vaccine acellular 5-component, tetanus vaccine toxoid (ADACEL) was not reported. It's reported that causal relationship with anosmia, ageusia, pyrexia, headache regarding covid-19 vaccine prot. subunit (nvx cov 2373) (NOVAVAX COVID-19 VACCINE) was possible related.  Upon internal review, the event of unresponsive to stimuli was determined to be medically significant.
Sex: M
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Herpes zoster oticus
Clinical narrative: Shingles in his neck going into one of his ears; Next day he had shingles in his neck; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of herpes zoster otitis externa in a male patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, 1 day after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced herpes zoster otitis externa (Verbatim: Shingles in his neck going into one of his ears) (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles (Verbatim: Next day he had shingles in his neck). The outcome of the herpes zoster otitis externa and shingles were not reported.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the herpes zoster otitis externa and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.   It was unknown if the company considered the herpes zoster otitis externa and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.   Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 26-FEB-2024 This case was reported by a patient via interactive digital media. The reporters brother in law got the shingles vaccine and next day he had shingles in his neck going into one of his ears. Follow-up would not possible as no contact details were available.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS, VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Pain, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: I had the shots but I still got them and they hurt bad/ Suspected vaccination failure; Still got them; hurt bad; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   Co-suspect products included Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received the 2nd dose of Shingles vaccine and the 1st dose of Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: I had the shots but I still got them and they hurt bad/ Suspected vaccination failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant), shingles (Verbatim: Still got them) and pain (Verbatim: hurt bad). The outcome of the vaccination failure was unknown and the outcome of the shingles and pain were resolved.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure, shingles and pain to be related to Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine.     It was unknown if the company considered the vaccination failure, shingles and pain to be related to Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine.   Additional Information: GSK Receipt date: 27-FEB-2024 This case was reported by a patient via interactive digital media. Patient had the shots but still got them and they hurt but not as long Because patient had shots. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule, time to onset for shingles and laboratory confirmation regarding shingles were unknown at the time of reporting. The follow-up could not be possible as no contact details were available.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: I got the shot, the next day I got my up to my neck, but went away within 24 hours/ Suspected vaccination failure; I got the shot, the next day I got my up to my neck, but went away within 24 hours; got the second one, same thing; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   Family history included shingles (patient's mom got them at 89 and never able to get cured from shingles), pain (patient's mom was in so much pain) and pneumonia (patient's mom died a year and half later, died from pneumonia, it was sad to watch).   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: I got the shot, the next day I got my up to my neck, but went away within 24 hours/ Suspected vaccination failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant), shingles (Verbatim: I got the shot, the next day I got my up to my neck, but went away within 24 hours) and shingles (Verbatim: got the second one, same thing). The outcome of the vaccination failure was unknown and the outcome of the shingles was resolved and the outcome of the shingles was not reported.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure, shingles and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.   It was unknown if the company considered the vaccination failure, shingles and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.   Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 27-FEB-2024 This case was reported by a patient via interactive digital media. The patient received the shot and the next day got up-to his/her neck, but went away within 24 hours, got the second one and same thing. The patient was glad that got the shot. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding completion of primary schedule, time to onset for shingles and laboratory confirmation regarding shingles were unknown at the time of reporting. Follow-up would not possible as no contact details were available.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: Suspected vaccination failure; Even with the Shingle shot they get really bad; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: Suspected vaccination failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles (Verbatim: Even with the Shingle shot they get really bad). The outcome of the vaccination failure was unknown and the outcome of the shingles was not reported.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.     It was unknown if the company considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.   Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 27-FEB-2024 The patient stated that even with the Shingle shot they get really bad. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule, time to onset for shingles and laboratory confirmation regarding shingles were unknown at the time of reporting. The follow-up could not be possible as no contact details were available.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: Had a friend who got the vaccine and got a horrible case of shingles/ Suspected vaccination failure; Shingles; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: Had a friend who got the vaccine and got a horrible case of shingles/ Suspected vaccination failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles (Verbatim: Shingles). The outcome of the vaccination failure was unknown and the outcome of the shingles was not reported.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.   It was unknown if the company considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.   Additional Information: RA Receipt Date: 27-FEB-2024 This case was reported by a patient's friend via (Privacy) interactive digital media. The patient got the vaccine and got a horrible case of shingles. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding completion of primary schedule, time to onset for shingles and laboratory confirmation regarding shingles were unknown at the time of reporting.
Sex: M
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: Broke out in the shingles after getting the shot/Suspected vaccination failure; Shigles/broke out in the shingles; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a male patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingrix) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingrix. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Shingrix, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: Broke out in the shingles after getting the shot/Suspected vaccination failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles (Verbatim: Shigles). The outcome of the vaccination failure was unknown and the outcome of the shingles was not reported.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingrix.     It was unknown if the company considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingrix.   Additional Information: RA Receipt Date: 27-FEB-2024 The reporter stated that friend of reporter went and got the shot and he broke out in the shingles after he got the shot and they say that the shingles shot is only 50/50 where you get them or not. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule, time to onset for shingles and laboratory confirmation regarding shingles were unknown at the time of reporting. The follow-up could not be possible as no contact details were available.; Sender's Comments:  US-GSK-US2024AMR026167:same reporter,Different patient (reporter's case)
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS, VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Pain, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: The shots hurt really bad; bad case of shingles/ Supected vaccination failure; bad case of shingles; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   Co-suspect products included Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   In FEB-2023, the patient received the 2nd dose of Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, the patient received the 1st dose of Shingles vaccine. In FEB-2024, 1 year after receiving Shingles vaccine and an unknown time after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: bad case of shingles/ Supected vaccination failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles (Verbatim: bad case of shingles). On an unknown date, the patient experienced pain (Verbatim: The shots hurt really bad). The outcome of the vaccination failure was unknown and the outcome of the shingles and pain were not reported.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure, shingles and pain to be related to Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine.     It was unknown if the company considered the vaccination failure, shingles and pain to be related to Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine.   Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 27-FEB-2024 This case was reported by consumer via interactive digital media. The patient reported that he/she got the 2 shots like recommended, the last shot was in February of 2023 of last year.  Now February of 2024 one year later he/she had a really bad case of shingles. The shots hurt really bad too, can't win far losing. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure since the details regarding the laboratory confirmation of shingles were unknown at the time of reporting. Follow up was not possible, as no contact details were available.
Sex: F
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: not always as my friend got the shots and now has shingles/Suspected vaccination failure; Shingles; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a female patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: not always as my friend got the shots and now has shingles/Suspected vaccination failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles (Verbatim: Shingles). The outcome of the vaccination failure was unknown and the outcome of the shingles was not resolved.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.   It was unknown if the company considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.   Additional Information: RA Receipt Date: 28-FEB-2024 This case was reported by a patient's friend via (Privacy) interactive digital media. The reporter reported that as her/his friend got the shots and now (at the time of reporting) had shingles. The patient said that she would not wish this on her.  The reporter stated that worst enemy. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding completion of primary schedule, time to onset for shingles and laboratory confirmation regarding shingles were unknown at the time of reporting.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: People got the vaccine shot and later got Shingles/ suspected vaccination failure; Shingles; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: People got the vaccine shot and later got Shingles/ suspected vaccination failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles (Verbatim: Shingles). The outcome of the vaccination failure was unknown and the outcome of the shingles was not reported.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.     It was unknown if the company considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.   Additional Information: RA Receipt Date: 28-FEB-2024 This case was reported by a reporter via (Privacy) interactive digital media. The reporter state that some Doctors don't want their patients to get the vaccine. Also the reporter knew people that got the shot and later got Shingles. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule, time to onset for shingles and laboratory confirmation regarding shingles were unknown at the time of reporting. The follow-up could not be possible as no contact details were available.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: Suspected vaccination failure; still got shingles; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: Suspected vaccination failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles (Verbatim: still got shingles). The outcome of the vaccination failure was unknown and the outcome of the shingles was not reported.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.     It was unknown if the company considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.   Additional Information: RA Receipt Date: 28-Feb-2024 This case was reported by consumer via (Privacy) interactive digital media. The patient stated that he/she got shingles shot and still got shingles. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule, time to onset and laboratory test confirming shingles were unknown at the time of reporting.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS, VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: I've had both shingle shots / suspected vaccination failure; Shingles; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingrix) for prophylaxis.   Co-suspect products included Herpes zoster (Shingrix) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received the 2nd dose of Shingrix and the 1st dose of Shingrix. In AUG-2023, an unknown time after receiving Shingrix and Shingrix, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: I've had both shingle shots / suspected vaccination failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles (Verbatim: Shingles). The outcome of the vaccination failure was unknown and the outcome of the shingles was not resolved.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingrix and Shingrix.     It was unknown if the company considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingrix and Shingrix.   Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 29-FEB-2024 This case was reported by the patient via interactive digital media. The reporter had both shingle shots and now had shingles since last August. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding time to onset and laboratory test confirming shingles were unknown at the time of reporting. The follow-up could not be possible as no contact details were available.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Burning sensation, Herpes zoster, Post herpetic neuralgia, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: The shot made the patient get them/Suspected vaccination failure; The patient got them; left leg was like being burned on the body; Post herpetic neuralgia; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: The shot made the patient get them/Suspected vaccination failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant), shingles (Verbatim: The patient got them), post herpetic neuralgia (Verbatim: Post herpetic neuralgia) and burning sensation (Verbatim: left leg was like being burned on the body). The outcome of the vaccination failure was unknown and the outcome of the shingles and burning sensation were not reported and the outcome of the post herpetic neuralgia was not reported (duration 14 years).   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure, shingles, post herpetic neuralgia and burning sensation to be related to Shingles vaccine.     It was unknown if the company considered the vaccination failure, shingles, post herpetic neuralgia and burning sensation to be related to Shingles vaccine.   Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 29-FEB-2024 This case was reported by a patient via interactive digital media. The patient stated that shot made the patient get them and nerve pain had been with the patient for 14 years. The left leg was like being burned on the body. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule, time to onset for shingles and laboratory confirmation regarding shingles were unknown at the time of reporting. The follow-up could not be possible as no contact details were available.
Sex: F
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Rash, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: Suspected vaccination failure; Shingles; rash and most of the time it as minor; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a female patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: Suspected vaccination failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant), shingles (Verbatim: Shingles) and rash (Verbatim: rash and most of the time it as minor). The outcome of the vaccination failure was unknown and the outcome of the shingles and rash were not reported.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure, shingles and rash to be related to Shingles vaccine.     It was unknown if the company considered the vaccination failure, shingles and rash to be related to Shingles vaccine.   Additional Information: RA Receipt Date: 29-Feb-2024 This case was reported by consumer via (Privacy) interactive digital media. The reporter stated that it was a rash and most of the time it as minor. The reporter stated that the patient (mom in law) got her so called shingles vaccine and load and behold she got her shingle. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule, time to onset and laboratory test confirming shingles were unknown at the time of reporting. The follow-up could not be possible as no contact details were available.
Sex: F
Vaccine: VARZOS, VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: Suspceted vaccination failure; Shingles; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a female patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   Co-suspect products included Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine (unknown arm) and Shingles vaccine (unknown arm). On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: Suspceted vaccination failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles (Verbatim: Shingles). The outcome of the vaccination failure was unknown and the outcome of the shingles was not reported.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine.     It was unknown if the company considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine and Shingles vaccine.   Additional Information: RA Receipt Date: 29-FEB-2024 The case was received from the consumer (Privacy) via interactive digital media. The patient (reporter's girlfriend) fully vaxed shingles attack after shingles attack, the reporter had them more than she did not, the reporter did say this shot not work either. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule, time to onset for shingles and laboratory confirmation regarding shingles were unknown at the time of reporting. The follow-up could not be possible as no contact details were available
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS, VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: I have had shingles twice/ Suspected Vaccination failure; Shingles; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingrix) for prophylaxis.   Co-suspect products included Herpes zoster (Shingrix) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received the 2nd dose of Shingrix (unknown arm) and the 1st dose of Shingrix (unknown arm). On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Shingrix and Shingrix, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: I have had shingles twice/ Suspected Vaccination failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles (Verbatim: Shingles). The outcome of the vaccination failure was unknown and the outcome of the shingles was not reported.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingrix and Shingrix.     It was unknown if the company considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingrix and Shingrix.   Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 29-FEB-2024 This case was reported by consumer via interactive digital media. The patient had shingles twice. It did nothing for reporter. One outbreak was after the vaccine (x2) injections. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding time to onset for shingles and laboratory confirmation regarding shingles were unknown at the time of reporting. The follow-up could not be possible as no contact details were available
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Pain, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: Suspected vaccination failure; Very painful, I hate them, I took the shot and still had them twice; Pain/Very painful/unending pain; they are awful; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: Suspected vaccination failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant), shingles (Verbatim: Very painful, I hate them, I took the shot and still had them twice), pain (Verbatim: Pain/Very painful/unending pain) and feels awful (Verbatim: they are awful). The outcome of the vaccination failure was unknown and the outcome of the shingles and feels awful were not reported and the outcome of the pain was resolved.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure, shingles, pain and feels awful to be related to Shingles vaccine.     It was unknown if the company considered the vaccination failure, shingles, pain and feels awful to be related to Shingles vaccine.   Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 29-Feb-2024 This case was reported by the patient via interactive digital media. The patient stated that it was very painful and hate them, further stated that he/she took the vaccine and still had them twice, so evidently the 200.00 dollar shot was of no help. The patient stated that he/she felt sorry for any one that got them, they were very awful, and seemed like unending pain. The patient stated that his/her pain lasted for months. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule, time to onset and laboratory test confirming shingles were unknown at the time of reporting.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: Suspected vaccination failure; Shingles; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   Concurrent medical conditions included shingles.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: Suspected vaccination failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles (Verbatim: Shingles). The outcome of the vaccination failure was unknown and the outcome of the shingles was not reported.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.     It was unknown if the company considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.   Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 29-Feb-2024 This case was reported by the patient via interactive digital media. The patient stated that she/he had shingles and got the shingles vaccine and had shingles again. The patient asked that was she/he need the vaccine again. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule, time to onset and laboratory test confirming shingles were unknown at the time of reporting. The follow-up could not be possible as no contact details were available.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: Patient got the shot and it did not last/Suspected vaccination failure; Shingles; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingrix) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingrix. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Shingrix, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: Patient got the shot and it did not last/Suspected vaccination failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles (Verbatim: Shingles). The outcome of the vaccination failure was unknown and the outcome of the shingles was not reported.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingrix.     It was unknown if the company considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingrix.   Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 29-FEB-2024 This case was reported by a patient via interactive digital media. The patient stated that he/she was just getting over the second go round. Because the patient got the shot, it did not last nearly as long.  The reporter stated that believehim/her, you did not want to get shingles. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule, time to onset for shingles and laboratory confirmation regarding shingles were unknown at the time of reporting. The follow-up could not be possible as no contact details were available.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Deafness unilateral, Herpes zoster, Pain, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: Suspected vaccination failure; Lost half hearing in right ear; Shingles on of head and scalp; Painful stabbing pains; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, 8 months after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: Suspected vaccination failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant), hearing loss unilateral (Verbatim: Lost half hearing in right ear) (serious criteria GSK medically significant), shingles (Verbatim: Shingles on of head and scalp) and pain (Verbatim: Painful stabbing pains). The outcome of the vaccination failure was unknown and the outcome of the hearing loss unilateral, shingles and pain were not reported.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure, hearing loss unilateral, shingles and pain to be related to Shingles vaccine.     It was unknown if the company considered the vaccination failure, hearing loss unilateral, shingles and pain to be related to Shingles vaccine.   Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 29-FEB-2024 The case was received from the patient via interactive digital media. The patient asked that what was shingles. The patient broke out about 8 months after vaccine on right side of head and scalp and lost half hearing in right ear.  The patient reported that went back several years later when his/her physician said to get vaccine again and 4 months later it recycled on right side of head and painful stabbing pains. The patient has to increase medicines when he/she feel it starting. The patient reported that it did not work for him/her. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding completion of primary schedule and laboratory confirmation regarding shingles were unknown at the time of reporting.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Herpes zoster, Vaccination failure
Clinical narrative: Suspected Vaccination Failure; I got the shot. And a year later got a very mild case on my forehead but not too bad; This serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of vaccination failure in a patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingles vaccine) for prophylaxis.   On an unknown date, the patient received Shingles vaccine. On an unknown date, 1 year after receiving Shingles vaccine, the patient experienced vaccination failure (Verbatim: Suspected Vaccination Failure) (serious criteria GSK medically significant) and shingles (Verbatim: I got the shot. And a year later got a very mild case on my forehead but not too bad). The outcome of the vaccination failure was unknown and the outcome of the shingles was not reported.   It was unknown if the reporter considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.     It was unknown if the company considered the vaccination failure and shingles to be related to Shingles vaccine.   Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 29-Feb-2024 This case was reported by the patient via interactive digital media. The patient stated that she/he got the vaccine, and a year later got a very mild case on his/her forehead but not too bad. This case was considered as suspected vaccination failure as details regarding completion of primary vaccination schedule and laboratory test confirming shingles were unknown at the time of reporting.