Age: 49.0
Sex: F
Vaccine: COVID19
Symptoms: Blood disorder, Immunoglobulin therapy
Clinical narrative: intravenous globular syndrome; get IVIG (treatment) right out of the kit; This is a spontaneous report received from a contactable reporter(s) (Consumer or other non HCP) from medical information team.  A 50-year-old female patient received BNT162b2 (BNT162B2), as dose number unknown, single (Lot number: ER8731) at the age of 49 years for covid-19 immunisation. The patient's relevant medical history and concomitant medications were not reported. The following information was reported: BLOOD DISORDER (medically significant), outcome "unknown", described as "intravenous globular syndrome"; IMMUNOGLOBULIN THERAPY (medically significant), outcome "unknown", described as "get IVIG (treatment) right out of the kit". Clinical Course: Question: Consumer called to find out the status of the safety effects she reported 13 months ago after getting the Pfizer Biotech Covid-19 Vaccine and asked why no one was able to follow up on her. Consumer stated that she had called Pfizer's (option 1) and was referred to Pfizer to inquire about the adverse event status she had reported 13 months ago. consumer stated that she experienced 30 hours after she got the second dose of the Pfizer Biotech Covid-19 vaccine on 13Apr2021.Consumer also stated that she had to be put on a walker/wheelchair because of the side effect and stated that she was previously active and doing "ms 150 backride" prior to getting the vaccine. Consumer also stated that she is connected with 2 other people who got the same lot number of the vaccine, one is a 16 year old who died a few months after getting the vaccine (still connected with the father) and the other one is a mother who had "intravenous globular syndrome" (was unable to capture the exact condition during the call). Age: 49 Years old when she got the vaccine (50 Years old currently). Gender: Female. E-transmitting potential AE duplicate. Question: Consumer stated that she had filed the paperwork last year (safety report concerning the side effect she experienced with the Pfizer Biontech covid-19 vaccine) and stated that nobody called her back for a follow up. Consumer also stated that because of some laws passed in 1986 and because of EUA, Pfizer doesn't have much liability. Consumer also stated that the covid patients who filed compensation never received a dime. Consumer also mentioned that from a corporation standpoint, they should be doing something to help those who have no savings account and experienced side effects from the vaccine. Consumer also stated that corporate social responsibility is very importation and that those are the ones that they need to support and support program is not doing it. Question: Consumer thanked Pfizer and stated mentioned: "I appreciate your time and for listening". Additional Context:This is the third case out of 3 split cases. Reporter reporting for other patient, Concern: Reporter stated, "I already reported Pfizer a long time ago when I first had my adverse reaction because of COVID Vaccine (Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine). I have a report reference#. It is #. So, I had a very bad reaction and I am still suffering from more than 13 months now. I have connected with many others who were suffering and I have get connected with two people specifically who had the same batch number I had, which was concerning for me personally. So, I wanted to alert you also. I do not think you have updated all of the issues that I am having. When clarified if the other two patients also experienced the same experiences as that of the Reporter, in response Reporter stated, "Well, not exactly the same reaction. One died, a 16-year-old boy died and then another woman. I think she is younger than me. She did get IVIG (intravenous immunoglobulin) (treatment) right out of the kit, she got treatment on adverse like reaction to a vaccine (Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine). She is doing much better than I am. You know, one passed away. I am struggling significantly on disability and I was previo usly very active. I was a long distance biker, I am a triathlete and now I need a walker, wheel chair, spending over 13 months. So, I just want to make sure that part is noted and I mean I feel like that there should be a follow-up too from Pfizer to the people who had adverse events. So, there is more study being done about (incomplete sentence)." Reporter was informed about the role of Pfizer Drug Safety Department. When probed for the patient details: Reporter stated, "I have their names. Would that be helpful? And I know again they had the same LOT#. For me it was the second LOT# that we overlapped and that is when that started after my second LOT# ER8731 (confirmed as ER8731)."Expiration date of Covid-19 Vaccine: Reporter stated, "I am not sure. I can look that in cupboard if you need to find that. I do not know about theirs. So, I do not know. You know, I do not have their LOT#, Expiration date (later Reporter clarified the LOT# as: ER8731). I just know their name. And I just know the one woman who had called in. I would assume that the man that I am connected with him. You know, like I know him because he lost his son and trying to get a little bit of justice. I cannot find my card right there. I do not know where it is? I do not know actually. But I did report it earlier. Consent for follow-up: Reporter stated," Yeah, I mean, I want to be the part of the science here since I went from very healthy to not good at all health." When clarified if both the patients (Other two patients) received the COVID-19 Vaccine from the same LOT#: Reporter stated, "Yes. Patient details: Name: Reporter stated, "Her name is '(name withheld)' and her last name is '(name withheld)'. I know that she has called. I believe that is her last name. That is her last name on social media. She is in (name withheld). (Patient name not clarified appropriately over the call hence, initials captured as unknown in tab) Reporter confirmed that both the patients received the Covid-19 Vaccine from the same LOT# as the Reporter received (LOT#:ER8731) When probed for confirmation if it is okay to follow up: Reporter further stated, "Yes, I would like you to. Did you have my other report in the system? It is strange that no one did it (incomplete sentence)."Reporter was informed that the same information has been documented in Pfizer Database and they might receive a follow-up letter from Pfizer as well. Reporter stated, "No, problem, just curious about. I gave you the report reference number when I called you? Is that in your system that I have called before?" Appropriate response was provided over the call. Further assistance: Reporter stated, "Could you explain to me what Pfizer is doing when they are getting report in general or do you not know (incomplete sentence)." QR comment: MI query was resolved in parent case. LRN W# is linked with LRN W# and LRN W#.  Follow-up (01Jun2022): This is a spontaneous follow-up report from a contactable consumer. This consumer reported for a 50-year-old female patient that: Updated information included: Reporter Information (address added. Patient Information (first name, last name) added. Event information (new event Immunoglobulin therapy) added.  Follow-up (03Jun2022): Follow-up attempts are completed. No further information is expected. No follow-up attempts are possible. No further information is expected.