chrisvoncsefalvay/vaers-narrative-generation huggingface dataset:
Sex: F
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Incorrect storage of drug, No adverse event
Clinical narrative: This spontaneous report as received from a doctor of pharmacy refers to a patient of unknown age and gender. Pertinent medical history and drug reactions/allergies were not reported. On 24-SEP-2013, the patient was vaccinated with ZOSTAVAX (lot # J004268 and expiry date 12-JUL-2014) (dose and route were not reported). No concomitant medication was reported. The call was reported originally on 04-NOV-2013 in which the reporter requested the stability for an improperly stored ZOSTAVAX. At the time of the call it was reported that the ZOSTAVAX was exposed to 15F for an unspecified amount of hours but reported that no doses of ZOSTAVAX were administered. The reporter called back again on 05-NOV-2013, and stated that he thought that the ZOSTAVAX might had been stored improperly since May 2013 and that the temperature of the ZOSTAVAX had ranged between 15F and 20F for an unspecified amount of hours. At that time the reporter was unsure if the ZOSTAVAX was administered but stated that he thought the ZOSTAVAX would have been administered. On further investigation, the pharmacist reported that ZOSTAVAX had been improperly stored since about 10-OCT-2013 reaching a highest of 20F for a total time of 600 hours. It was reported that the patient had no adverse effect. Further investigation stated that the pharmacist had determined that this case might involve approximately 5 different Lots of ZOSTAVAX (details unspecified) stored improperly at temperatures up to 21F. He stated the time frame for the excursions would be as of the day each of the ZOSTAVAX Lots was received at his facility through the date of patient administration, which he believed might had been months, dating back to on an unknown date in May 2013. These involved approximately 40 patients. He had no specific breakdown of time frame as his record didn't indicate when he received each Lot but he was calling further for the data. He also could not identify, at this time, which Lot # was administered on which date. Pharmacist would call back after he had compiled all of the necessary information and would like revaccination recommendations for any excursion that could not be supported. Pharmacist stated there had been no adverse effects noted by any of the patients. The pharmacist faxed a spreadsheet which included the 38 patients names, the date of administration as well as the lot and expiration dates of the ZOSTAVAX which was unsupported an administrated. This is one of several reports from the same source. Additional information has been requested.
Age: 49.0
Sex: M
Vaccine: FLUC3, FLUC3
Symptoms: Computerised tomogram, Dysphagia, Dyspnoea, Fatigue, Full blood count
Clinical narrative: Tinnitus - immediately following vaccinations - on going. Fatigue - tachycardic, dyspnea, dysphagia - treated x2 week. Tingling (nerve) of extremities - on going. Tx: Prednisone, albuterol, acetazolimide.
Age: 49.0
Sex: M
Vaccine: FLUC3, FLUC3
Symptoms: Immediate post-injection reaction, Laboratory test, Lumbar puncture, Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, Paraesthesia
Clinical narrative: Tinnitus - immediately following vaccinations - on going. Fatigue - tachycardic, dyspnea, dysphagia - treated x2 week. Tingling (nerve) of extremities - on going. Tx: Prednisone, albuterol, acetazolimide.
Age: 49.0
Sex: M
Vaccine: FLUC3, FLUC3
Symptoms: Tachycardia, Tinnitus
Clinical narrative: Tinnitus - immediately following vaccinations - on going. Fatigue - tachycardic, dyspnea, dysphagia - treated x2 week. Tingling (nerve) of extremities - on going. Tx: Prednisone, albuterol, acetazolimide.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Incorrect storage of drug, No adverse event
Clinical narrative: This spontaneous report as received from a doctor of pharmacy refers to a patient of unknown age and gender. Pertinent medical history and drug reactions/allergies were not reported. On 17-OCT-2013, the patient was vaccinated with ZOSTAVAX (lot # J004268 and expiry date 12-JUL-2014) (dose and route were not reported). No concomitant medication was reported. The call was reported originally on 04-NOV-2013 in which the reporter requested the stability for an improperly stored ZOSTAVAX. At the time of the call it was reported that the ZOSTAVAX was exposed to 15F for an unspecified amount of hours but reported that no doses of ZOSTAVAX were administered. The reporter called back again on 05-NOV-2013, and stated that he thought that the ZOSTAVAX might had been stored improperly since May 2013 and that the temperature of the ZOSTAVAX had ranged between 15F and 20F for an unspecified amount of hours. At that time the reporter was unsure if the ZOSTAVAX was administered but stated that he thought the ZOSTAVAX would have been administered. On further investigation, the pharmacist reported that ZOSTAVAX had been improperly stored since about 10-OCT-2013 reaching a highest of 20F for a total time of 600 hours. It was reported that the patient had no adverse effect. Further investigation stated that the pharmacist had determined that this case might involve approximately 5 different Lots of ZOSTAVAX (details unspecified) stored improperly at temperatures up to 21F. He stated the time frame for the excursions would be as of the day each of the ZOSTAVAX Lots was received at his facility through the date of patient administration, which he believed might had been months, dating back to on an unknown date in May 2013. These involved approximately 40 patients. He had no specific breakdown of time frame as his record didn't indicate when he received each Lot but he was calling further for the data. He also could not identify, at this time, which Lot # was administered on which date. Pharmacist would call back after he had compiled all of the necessary information and would like revaccination recommendations for any excursion that could not be supported. Pharmacist stated there had been no adverse effects noted by any of the patients. The pharmacist faxed a spreadsheet which included the 38 patients names, the date of administration as well as the lot and expiration dates of the ZOSTAVAX which was unsupported an administrated. This is one of several reports from the same source. Additional information has been requested.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Incorrect storage of drug, No adverse event
Clinical narrative: This spontaneous report as received from a doctor of pharmacy refers to a patient of unknown age and gender. Pertinent medical history and drug reactions/allergies were not reported. On 08-OCT-2013, the patient was vaccinated with ZOSTAVAX (lot # J004268 and expiry date 12-JUL-2014) (dose and route were not reported). No concomitant medication was reported. The call was reported originally on 04-NOV-2013 in which the reporter requested the stability for an improperly stored ZOSTAVAX. At the time of the call it was reported that the ZOSTAVAX was exposed to 15F for an unspecified amount of hours but reported that no doses of ZOSTAVAX were administered. The reporter called back again on 05-NOV-2013, and stated that he thought that the ZOSTAVAX might had been stored improperly since May 2013 and that the temperature of the ZOSTAVAX had ranged between 15F and 20F for an unspecified amount of hours. At that time the reporter was unsure if the ZOSTAVAX was administered but stated that he thought the ZOSTAVAX would have been administered. On further investigation, the pharmacist reported that ZOSTAVAX had been improperly stored since about 10-OCT-2013 reaching a highest of 20F for a total time of 600 hours. It was reported that the patient had no adverse effect. Further investigation stated that the pharmacist had determined that this case might involve approximately 5 different Lots of ZOSTAVAX (details unspecified) stored improperly at temperatures up to 21F. He stated the time frame for the excursions would be as of the day each of the ZOSTAVAX Lots was received at his facility through the date of patient administration, which he believed might had been months, dating back to on an unknown date in May 2013. These involved approximately 40 patients. He had no specific breakdown of time frame as his record didn't indicate when he received each Lot but he was calling further for the data. He also could not identify, at this time, which Lot # was administered on which date. Pharmacist would call back after he had compiled all of the necessary information and would like revaccination recommendations for any excursion that could not be supported. Pharmacist stated there had been no adverse effects noted by any of the patients. The pharmacist faxed a spreadsheet which included the 38 patients names, the date of administration as well as the lot and expiration dates of the ZOSTAVAX which was unsupported an administrated. This is one of several reports from the same source. Additional information has been requested.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Incorrect storage of drug, No adverse event
Clinical narrative: This spontaneous report as received from a doctor of pharmacy refers to a patient of unknown age and gender. Pertinent medical history and drug reactions/allergies were not reported. On 03-OCT-2013, the patient was vaccinated with ZOSTAVAX (lot # J004268 and expiry date 12-JUL-2014) (dose and route were not reported). No concomitant medication was reported. The call was reported originally on 04-NOV-2013 in which the reporter requested the stability for an improperly stored ZOSTAVAX. At the time of the call it was reported that the ZOSTAVAX were administered. The reporter called back again on 05-NOV-2013, and stated that he thought that the ZOSTAVAX might had been stored improperly since May 2013 and that the temperature of the ZOSTAVAX had ranged between 15F and 20F for an unspecified amount of hours. At that time the reporter was unsure if the ZOSTAVAX was administered but stated that he thought the ZOSTAVAX would had been administered. On further investigation, the pharmacist reported that ZOSTAVAX had been improperly stored since about 10-OCT-2013 reaching a highest of 20F for a total time of 600 hours. It was reported that the patient had no adverse effect. Further investigation stated that the pharmacist had determined that this case might involve approximately 5 different Lots of ZOSTAVAX (details unspecified) stored improperly at temperatures up to 21F. He stated the time frame for the excursions would be as of the day each of the ZOSTAVAX Lots was received at his facility through the date of patient administration, which he believed might had been months, dating back to on an unknown date in May 2013. These involved approximately 40 patients. He had no specific breakdown of time frame as his records didn't indicate when he received each Lot but he was calling further for the data. He also could not identify, at this time, which Lot# was administered on which date. Pharmacist would call back after he had compiled all of the necessary information and would like revaccination recommendations for any excursion that could not be supported. Pharmacist stated there had been no adverse effects noted by any of the patients. The pharmacist faxed a spreadsheet which included the 38 patients names, the date of administration as well as the lot and expiration dates of the ZOSTAVAX which was unsupported an administrated. This is one of several reports from the same source. Additional information has been requested.
Age: 15.0
Sex: F
Vaccine: FLU3, HPV4, VARCEL
Symptoms: Injection site erythema, Injection site swelling
Clinical narrative: Red/swelling at injection site area; per provider patient advised cold compresses 15-20 min 3-4 x daily, take Ibuprofen 600mg, if swelling not relieved or area hardened to go to urgent care.
Age: 11.0
Sex: F
Vaccine: FLU3
Symptoms: Erythema, Feeling hot, Swelling
Clinical narrative: Swelling with redness and feeling hot to area.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Incorrect storage of drug, No adverse event
Clinical narrative: This spontaneous report as received from a doctor of pharmacy refers to a patient of unknown age and gender. Pertinent medical history and drug reactions/allergies were not reported. On 12-SEP-2013, the patient was vaccinated with ZOSTAVAX (lot # J002777 and expiry date 07-JUN-2014) (dose and route were not reported). No concomitant medication was reported. The call was reported originally on 04-NOV-2013 in which the reporter requested the stability for an improperly stored ZOSTAVAX. At the time of the call it was reported that the ZOSTAVAX was exposed to 15F for an unspecified amount of hours but reported that no doses of ZOSTAVAX were administered. The reporter called back again on 05-NOV-2013, and stated that he thought that the ZOSTAVAX might had been stored improperly since May 2013 and that the temperature of the ZOSTAVAX had ranged between 15F and 20F for an unspecified amount of hours. At that time the reporter was unsure if the ZOSTAVAX was administered but stated that he thought the ZOSTAVAX would had been administered. On further investigation, the pharmacist reported that ZOSTAVAX had been improperly stored since about 10-OCT-2013 reaching a highest of 20F for a total time of 600 hours. It was reported that the patient had no adverse effect. Further investigation stated that the pharmacist had determined that this case might involve approximately 5 different Lots of ZOSTAVAX (details unspecified) stored improperly at temperatures up to 21F. He stated the time frame for the excursions would be as of the day each of the ZOSTAVAX Lots was received at his facility through the date of patient administration, which he believed might had been months, dating back to on an unknown date in May 2013. These involved approximately 40 patients. He had no specific breakdown of time frame as his records didn't indicate when he received each Lot but he was calling further for the data. He also could not identify, at this time, which Lot# was administered on which date. Pharmacist would call back after he had compiled all of the necessary information and would like revaccination recommendations for any excursion that could not be supported. Pharmacist stated there had been no adverse effects noted by any of the patients. The pharmacist faxed a spreadsheet which included the 38 patients names, the date of administration as well as the lot and expiration dates of the ZOSTAVAX which was unsupported an administrated. This is one of several reports from the same source. Additional information has been requested.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Incorrect storage of drug, No adverse event
Clinical narrative: This spontaneous report as received from a doctor of pharmacy refers to a patient of unknown age and gender. Pertinent medical history and drug reactions/allergies were not reported. On 05-AUG-2013, the patient was vaccinated with ZOSTAVAX (lot # J002777 and expiry date 07-JUN-2014) (dose and route were not reported). No concomitant medication was reported. The call was reported originally on 04-NOV-2013 in which the reporter requested the stability for an improperly stored ZOSTAVAX. At the time of the call it was reported that the ZOSTAVAX was exposed to 15F for an unspecified amount of hours but reported that no doses of ZOSTAVAX were administered. The reporter called back again on 05-NOV-2013, and stated that he thought that the ZOSTAVAX might had been stored improperly since May 2013 and that the temperature of the ZOSTAVAX had ranged between 15F and 20F for an unspecified amount of hours. At that time the reporter was unsure if the ZOSTAVAX was administered but stated that he thought the ZOSTAVAX would had been administered. On further investigation, the pharmacist reported that ZOSTAVAX had been improperly stored since about 10-OCT-2013 reaching a highest of 20F for a total time of 600 hours. It was reported that the patient had no adverse effect. Further investigation stated that the pharmacist had determined that this case might involve approximately 5 different Lots of ZOSTAVAX (details unspecified) stored improperly at temperatures up to 21F. He stated the time frame for the excursions would be as of the day each of the ZOSTAVAX Lots was received at his facility through the date of patient administration, which he believed might had been months, dating back to on an unknown date in May 2013. These involved approximately 40 patients. He had no specific breakdown of time frame as his records didn't indicate when he received each Lot but he was calling further for the data. He also could not identify, at this time, which Lot# was administered on which date. Pharmacist would call back after he had compiled all of the necessary information and would like revaccination recommendations for any excursion that could not be supported. Pharmacist stated there had been no adverse effects noted by any of the patients. The pharmacist faxed a spreadsheet which included the 38 patient's names, the date of administration as well as the lot and expiration dates of the ZOSTAVAX which was unsupported an administrated. This is one of several reports from the same source. Additional information has been requested.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Incorrect storage of drug, No adverse event
Clinical narrative: This spontaneous report as received from a doctor of pharmacy refers to a patient of unknown age and gender. Pertinent medical history and drug reactions/allergies were not reported. On 16-SEP-2013, the patient was vaccinated with ZOSTAVAX (lot # J002777 and expiry date 07-JUN-2014) (dose and route were not reported). No concomitant medication was reported. The call was reported originally on 04-NOV-2013 in which the reporter requested the stability for an improperly stored ZOSTAVAX. At the time of the call it was reported that the ZOSTAVAX was exposed to 15F for an unspecified amount of hours but reported that no doses of ZOSTAVAX were administered. The reporter called back again on 05-NOV-2013, and stated that he thought that the ZOSTAVAX might had been stored improperly since May 2013 and that the temperature of the ZOSTAVAX had ranged between 15F and 20F for an unspecified amount of hours. At that time the reporter was unsure if the ZOSTAVAX was administered but stated that he thought the ZOSTAVAX would had been administered. On further investigation, the pharmacist reported that ZOSTAVAX had been improperly stored since about 10-OCT-2013 reaching a highest of 20F for a total time of 600 hours. It was reported that the patient had no adverse effect. Further investigation stated that the pharmacist had determined that this case might involve approximately 5 different Lots of ZOSTAVAX (details unspecified) stored improperly at temperatures up to 21F. He stated the time frame for the excursions would be as of the day each of the ZOSTAVAX Lots was received at his facility through the date of patient administration, which he believed might had been months, dating back to on an unknown date in May 2013. These involved approximately 40 patients. He had no specific breakdown of time frame as his records didn't indicate when he received each Lot but he was calling further for the data. He also could not identify, at this time, which Lot# was administered on which date. Pharmacist would call back after he had compiled all of the necessary information and would like revaccination recommendations for any excursion that could not be supported. Pharmacist stated there had been no adverse effects noted by any of the patients. The pharmacist faxed a spreadsheet which included the 38 patients names, the date of administration as well as the lot and expiration dates of the ZOSTAVAX which was unsupported an administrated. This is one of several reports from the same source. Additional information has been requested.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Incorrect storage of drug, No adverse event
Clinical narrative: This spontaneous report as received from a doctor of pharmacy refers to a patient of unknown age and gender. Pertinent medical history and drug reactions/allergies were not reported. On 16-JUL-2013, the patient was vaccinated with ZOSTAVAX (lot # J001693 and expiry date 08-MAY-2014) (dose and route were not reported). No concomitant medication was reported. The call was reported originally on 04-NOV-2013 in which the reporter requested the stability for an improperly stored ZOSTAVAX. At the time of the call it was reported that the ZOSTAVAX was exposed to 15F for an unspecified amount of hours but reported that no doses of ZOSTAVAX were administered. The reporter called back again on 05-NOV-2013, and stated that he thought that the ZOSTAVAX might had been stored improperly since May 2013 and that the temperature of the ZOSTAVAX had ranged between 15F and 20F for an unspecified amount of hours. At that time the reporter was unsure if the ZOSTAVAX was administered but stated that he thought the ZOSTAVAX would had been administered. On further investigation, the pharmacist reported that ZOSTAVAX had been improperly stored since about 10-OCT-2013 reaching a highest of 20F for a total time of 600 hours. It was reported that the patient had no adverse effect. Further investigation stated that the pharmacist had determined that this case might involve approximately 5 different Lots of ZOSTAVAX (details unspecified) stored improperly at temperatures up to 21F. He stated the time frame for the excursions would be as of the day each of the ZOSTAVAX Lots was received at his facility through the date of patient administration, which he believed might had been months, dating back to on an unknown date in May 2013. These involved approximately 40 patients. He had no specific breakdown of time frame as his records didn't indicate when he received each Lot but he was calling further for the data. He also could not identify, at this time, which Lot# was administered on which date. Pharmacist would call back after he had compiled all of the necessary information and would like revaccination recommendations for any excursion that could not be supported. Pharmacist stated there had been no adverse effects noted by any of the patients. The pharmacist faxed a spreadsheet which included the 38 patients names, the date of administration as well as the lot and expiration dates of the ZOSTAVAX which was unsupported an administrated. This is one of several reports from the same source. Additional information has been requested.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Incorrect storage of drug, No adverse event
Clinical narrative: This spontaneous report as received from a doctor of pharmacy refers to a patient of unknown age and gender. Pertinent medical history and drug reactions/allergies were not reported. On 27-JUN-2013, the patient was vaccinated with ZOSTAVAX (lot # J001693 and expiry date 08-MAY-2014) (dose and route were not reported). No concomitant medication was reported. The call was reported originally on 04-NOV-2013 in which the reporter requested the stability for an improperly stored ZOSTAVAX. At the time of the call it was reported that the ZOSTAVAX was exposed to 15F for an unspecified amount of hours but reported that no doses of ZOSTAVAX were administered. The reporter called back again on 05-NOV-2013, and stated that he thought that the ZOSTAVAX might had been stored improperly since May 2013 and that the temperature of the ZOSTAVAX had ranged between 15F and 20F for an unspecified amount of hours. At that time the reporter was unsure if the ZOSTAVAX was administered but stated that he thought the ZOSTAVAX would had been administered. On further investigation, the pharmacist reported that ZOSTAVAX had been improperly stored since about 10-OCT-2013 reaching a highest of 20F for a total time of 600 hours. It was reported that the patient had no adverse effect. Further investigation stated that the pharmacist had determined that this case might involve approximately 5 different Lots of ZOSTAVAX (details unspecified) stored improperly at temperatures up to 21F. He stated the time frame for the excursions would be as of the day each of the ZOSTAVAX Lots was received at his facility through the date of patient administration, which he believed might had been months, dating back to on an unknown date in May 2013. These involved approximately 40 patients. He had no specific breakdown of time frame as his records didn't indicate when he received each Lot but he was calling further for the data. He also could not identify, at this time, which Lot# was administered on which date. Pharmacist would call back after he had compiled all of the necessary information and would like revaccination recommendations for any excursion that could not be supported. Pharmacist stated there had been no adverse effects noted by any of the patients. The pharmacist faxed a spreadsheet which included the 38 patients names, the date of administration as well as the lot and expiration dates of the ZOSTAVAX which was unsupported an administrated. This is one of several reports from the same source. Additional information has been requested.
Sex: F
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Incorrect storage of drug, No adverse event
Clinical narrative: This spontaneous report as received from a doctor of pharmacy refers to a patient of unknown age and gender. Pertinent medical history and drug reactions/allergies were not reported. On 15-AUG-2013, the patient was vaccinated with ZOSTAVAX (lot # J002777 and expiry date 07-JUN-2014) (dose and route were not reported). No concomitant medication was reported. The call was reported originally on 04-NOV-2013 in which the reporter requested the stability for an improperly stored ZOSTAVAX. At the time of the call it was reported that the ZOSTAVAX was exposed to 15F for an unspecified amount of hours but reported that no doses of ZOSTAVAX were administered. The reporter called back again on 05-NOV-2013, and stated that he thought that the ZOSTAVAX might had been stored improperly since May 2013 and that the temperature of the ZOSTAVAX had ranged between 15F and 20F for an unspecified amount of hours. At that time the reporter was unsure if the ZOSTAVAX was administered but stated that he thought the ZOSTAVAX would have been administered. On further investigation, the pharmacist reported that ZOSTAVAX had been improperly stored since about 10-OCT-2013 reaching a highest of 20F for a total time of 600 hours. It was reported that the patient had no adverse effect. Further investigation stated that the pharmacist had determined that this case might involve approximately 5 different Lots of ZOSTAVAX (details unspecified) stored improperly at temperatures up to 21F. He stated the time frame for the excursions would be as of the day each of the ZOSTAVAX Lots was received at his facility through the date of patient administration, which he believed might had been months, dating back to on an unknown date in May 2013. These involved approximately 40 patients. He had no specific breakdown of time frame as his record didn't indicate when he received each Lot but he was calling further for the data. He also could not identify, at this time, which Lot # was administered on which date. Pharmacist would call back after he had compiled all of the necessary information and would like revaccination recommendations for any excursion that could not be supported. Pharmacist stated there had been no adverse effects noted by any of the patients. The pharmacist faxed a spreadsheet which included the 38 patients names, the date of administration as well as the lot and expiration dates of the ZOSTAVAX which was unsupported an administrated. This is one of several reports from the same source. Additional information has been requested.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Incorrect storage of drug, No adverse event
Clinical narrative: This spontaneous report as received from a doctor of pharmacy refers to a patient of unknown age and gender. Pertinent medical history and drug reactions/allergies were not reported. On 20-SEP-2013, the patient was vaccinated with ZOSTAVAX (lot # J002777 and expiry date 07-JUN-2014) (dose and route were not reported). No concomitant medication was reported. The call was reported originally on 04-NOV-2013 in which the reporter requested the stability for an improperly stored ZOSTAVAX. At the time of the call it was reported that the ZOSTAVAX was exposed to 15F for an unspecified amount of hours but reported that no doses of ZOSTAVAX were administered. The reporter called back again on 05-NOV-2013, and stated that he thought that the ZOSTAVAX might had been stored improperly since May 2013 and that the temperature of the ZOSTAVAX had ranged between 5F and 20F for an unspecified amount of hours. At that time the reporter was unsure if the ZOSTAVAX was administered but stated that he thought the ZOSTAVAX would had been administered. On further investigation, the pharmacist reported that ZOSTAVAX had been improperly stored since about 10-OCT-2013 reaching a highest of 20F for a total time of 600 hours. It was reported that the patient had no adverse effect. Further investigation stated that the pharmacist had determined that this case might involve approximately 5 different lots of ZOSTAVAX (details unspecified) stored improperly at temperatures up to 21F. He stated the time frame for the excursions would be as of the day each of the ZOSTAVX Lots was received at his facility through the date of patient administration, which he believed might had been months, dating back to on an unknown date in May 2013. These involved approximately 40 patients. He had no specific breakdown of time frame as his records didn't indicate when he received each Lot but he was calling further for the data. He also could not identify, at this time, which lot# was administered on which date. Pharmacist would call back after he had compiled all of the necessary information and would like revaccination recommendations for any excursion that could not be supported. Pharmacist stated there had been no adverse effects noted by any of the patients. The pharmacist faxed a spreadsheet which included the 38 patients names, the date of administration as well as the lot and expiration dates of the ZOSTAVAX which was unsupported an administered. This is one of several reports from the same source. Additional information has been requested.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Incorrect storage of drug, No adverse event
Clinical narrative: This spontaneous report as received from a doctor of pharmacy refers to a patient of unknown age and gender. Pertinent medical history and drug reactions/allergies were not reported. On 25-JUN-2013, the patient was vaccinated with ZOSTAVAX (lot # J000443 and expiry date 11-APR-2014) (dose and route were not reported). No concomitant medication was reported. The call was reported originally on 04-NOV-2013 in which the reporter requested the stability for an improperly stored ZOSTAVAX. At the time of the call it was reported that the ZOSTAVAX was exposed to 15F for an unspecified amount of hours but reported that no doses of ZOSTAVAX were administered. The reporter called back again on 05-NOV-2013, and stated that he thought that the ZOSTAVAX might had been stored improperly since May 2013 and that the temperature of the ZOSTAVAX had ranged between 15F and 20F for an unspecified amount of hours. At that time the reporter was unsure if the ZOSTAVAX was administered but stated that he thought the ZOSTAVAX would had been administered. On further investigation, the pharmacist reported that ZOSTAVAX had been improperly stored since about 10-OCT-2013 reaching a highest of 20F for a total time of 600 hours. It was reported that the patient had no adverse effect. Further investigation stated that the pharmacist had determined that this case might involve approximately 5 different Lots of ZOSTAVAX (details unspecified) stored improperly at temperatures up to 21F. He stated the time frame for the excursions would be as of the day each of the ZOSTAVAX Lots was received at his facility through the date of patient administration, which he believed might had been months, dating back to on an unknown date in May 2013. These involved approximately 40 patients. He had no specific breakdown of time frame as his records didn't indicate when he received each Lot but he was calling further for the data. He also could not identify, at this time, which Lot# was administered on which date. Pharmacist would call back after he had compiled all of the necessary information and would like revaccination recommendations for any excursion that could not be supported. Pharmacist stated there had been no adverse effects noted by any of the patients. The pharmacist faxed a spreadsheet which included the 38 patients names, the date of administration as well as the lot and expiration dates of the ZOSTAVAX which was unsupported an administrated. This is one of several reports from the same source. Additional information has been requested.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Incorrect storage of drug, No adverse event
Clinical narrative: This spontaneous report as received from a doctor of pharmacy refers to a patient of unknown age and gender. Pertinent medical history and drug reactions/allergies were not reported. On 23-JUL-2013, the patient was vaccinated with ZOSTAVAX (lot # J002777 and expiry date 07-JUN-2014) (dose and route were not reported). No concomitant medication was reported. The call was reported originally on 04-NOV-2013 in which the reporter requested the stability for an improperly stored ZOSTAVAX. At the time of the call it was reported that the ZOSTAVAX was exposed to 15F for an unspecified amount of hours but reported that no doses of ZOSTAVAX were administered. The reporter called back again on 05-NOV-2013, and stated that he thought that the ZOSTAVAX might had been stored improperly since May 2013 and that the temperature of the ZOSTAVAX had ranged between 15F and 20F for an unspecified amount of hours. At that time the reporter was unsure if the ZOSTAVAX was administered but stated that he thought the ZOSTAVAX would had been administered. On further investigation, the pharmacist reported that ZOSTAVAX had been improperly stored since about 10-OCT-2013 reaching a highest of 20F for a total time of 600 hours. It was reported that the patient had no adverse effect. Further investigation stated that the pharmacist had determined that this case might involve approximately 5 different Lots of ZOSTAVAX (details unspecified) stored improperly at temperatures up to 21F. He stated the time frame for the excursions would be as of the day each of the ZOSTAVAX Lots was received at his facility through the date of patient administration, which he believed might had been months, dating back to on an unknown date in May 2013. These involved approximately 40 patients. He had no specific breakdown of time frame as his records didn't indicate when he received each Lot but he was calling further for the data. He also could not identify, at this time, which Lot# was administered on which date. Pharmacist would call back after he had compiled all of the necessary information and would like revaccination recommendations for any excursion that could not be supported. Pharmacist stated there had been no adverse effects noted by any of the patients. The pharmacist faxed a spreadsheet which included the 38 patients names, the date of administration as well as the lot and expiration dates of the ZOSTAVAX which was unsupported an administrated. This is one of several reports from the same source. Additional information has been requested.
Sex: F
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Incorrect storage of drug, No adverse event
Clinical narrative: This spontaneous report as received from a doctor of pharmacy refers to a patient of unknown age and gender. Pertinent medical history and drug reactions/allergies were not reported. On 22-AUG-2013, the patient was vaccinated with ZOSTAVAX (lot # J002777and expiry date 07-JUN-2014) (dose and route were not reported). No concomitant medication was reported. The call was reported originally on 04-NOV-2013 in which the reporter requested the stability for an improperly stored ZOSTAVAX. At the time of the call it was reported that the ZOSTAVAX was exposed to 15F for an unspecified amount of hours but reported that no doses of ZOSTAVAX were administered. The reporter called back again on 05-NOV-2013, and stated that he thought that the ZOSTAVAX might had been stored improperly since May 2013 and that the temperature of the ZOSTAVAX had ranged between 15F and 20F for an unspecified amount of hours. At that time the reporter was unsure if the ZOSTAVAX was administered but stated that he thought the ZOSTAVAX would have been administered. On further investigation, the pharmacist reported that ZOSTAVAX had been improperly stored since about 10-OCT-2013 reaching a highest of 20F for a total time of 600 hours. It was reported that the patient had no adverse effect. Further investigation stated that the pharmacist had determined that this case might involve approximately 5 different Lots of ZOSTAVAX (details unspecified) stored improperly at temperatures up to 21F. He stated the time frame for the excursions would be as of the day each of the ZOSTAVAX Lots was received at his facility through the date of patient administration, which he believed might had been months, dating back to on an unknown date in May 2013. These involved approximately 40 patients. He had no specific breakdown of time frame as his record didn't indicate when he received each Lot but he was calling further for the data. He also could not identify, at this time, which Lot # was administered on which date. Pharmacist would call back after he had compiled all of the necessary information and would like revaccination recommendations for any excursion that could not be supported. Pharmacist stated there had been no adverse effects noted by any of the patients. The pharmacist faxed a spreadsheet which included the 38 patients names, the date of administration as well as the lot and expiration dates of the ZOSTAVAX which was unsupported an administrated. This is one of several reports from the same source. Additional information has been requested.
Sex: M
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Incorrect storage of drug, No adverse event
Clinical narrative: This spontaneous report as received from a doctor of pharmacy refers to a patient of unknown age and gender. Pertinent medical history and drug reactions/allergies were not reported. On 13-SEP-2013, the patient was vaccinated with ZOSTAVAX (lot # J002777 and expiry date 07-JUN-2014) (dose and route were not reported). No concomitant medication was reported. The call was reported originally on 04-NOV-2013 in which the reporter requested the stability for an improperly stored ZOSTAVAX. At the time of the call it was reported that the ZOSTAVAX was exposed to 15F for an unspecified amount of hours but reported that no doses of ZOSTAVAX were administered. The reporter called back again on 05-NOV-2013, and stated that he thought that the ZOSTAVAX might had been stored improperly since May 2013 and that the temperature of the ZOSTAVAX had ranged between 15F and 20F for an unspecified amount of hours. At that time the reporter was unsure if the ZOSTAVAX was administered but stated that he thought the ZOSTAVAX would have been administered. On further investigation, the pharmacist reported that ZOSTAVAX had been improperly stored since about 10-OCT-2013 reaching a highest of 20F for a total time of 600 hours. It was reported that the patient had no adverse effect. Further investigation stated that the pharmacist had determined that this case might involve approximately 5 different Lots of ZOSTAVAX (details unspecified) stored improperly at temperatures up to 21F. He stated the time frame for the excursions would be as of the day each of the ZOSTAVAX Lots was received at his facility through the date of patient administration, which he believed might had been months, dating back to on an unknown date in May 2013. These involved approximately 40 patients. He had no specific breakdown of time frame as his record didn't indicate when he received each Lot but he was calling further for the data. He also could not identify, at this time, which Lot # was administered on which date. Pharmacist would call back after he had compiled all of the necessary information and would like revaccination recommendations for any excursion that could not be supported. Pharmacist stated there had been no adverse effects noted by any of the patients. The pharmacist faxed a spreadsheet which included the 38 patients names, the date of administration as well as the lot and expiration dates of the ZOSTAVAX which was unsupported an administrated. This is one of several reports from the same source. Additional information has been requested.
Sex: U
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Incorrect storage of drug, No adverse event
Clinical narrative: This spontaneous report as received from a doctor of pharmacy refers to a patient of unknown age and gender. Pertinent medical history and drug reactions/allergies were not reported. On 10-SEP-2013, the patient was vaccinated with ZOSTAVAX (lot # J002777 and expiry date 12-JUL-2014) (dose and route were not reported). No concomitant medication was reported. The call was reported originally on 04-NOV-2013 in which the reporter requested the stability for an improperly stored ZOSTAVAX. At the time of the call it was reported that the ZOSTAVAX was exposed to 15F for an unspecified amount of hours but reported that no doses of ZOSTAVAX were administered. The reporter called back again on 05-NOV-2013, and stated that he thought that the ZOSTAVAX might had been stored improperly since May 2013 and that the temperature of the ZOSTAVAX had ranged between 15F and 20F for an unspecified amount of hours. At that time the reporter was unsure if the ZOSTAVAX was administered but stated that he thought the ZOSTAVAX would have been administered. On further investigation, the pharmacist reported that ZOSTAVAX had been improperly stored since about 10-OCT-2013 reaching a highest of 20F for a total time of 600 hours. It was reported that the patient had no adverse effect. Further investigation stated that the pharmacist had determined that this case might involve approximately 5 different Lots of ZOSTAVAX (details unspecified) stored improperly at temperatures up to 21F. He stated the time frame for the excursions would be as of the day each of the ZOSTAVAX Lots was received at his facility through the date of patient administration, which he believed might had been months, dating back to on an unknown date in May 2013. These involved approximately 40 patients. He had no specific breakdown of time frame as his record didn't indicate when he received each Lot but he was calling further for the data. He also could not identify, at this time, which Lot # was administered on which date. Pharmacist would call back after he had compiled all of the necessary information and would like revaccination recommendations for any excursion that could not be supported. Pharmacist stated there had been no adverse effects noted by any of the patients. The pharmacist faxed a spreadsheet which included the 38 patients names, the date of administration as well as the lot and expiration dates of the ZOSTAVAX which was unsupported an administrated. This is one of several reports from the same source. Additional information has been requested.
Sex: F
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Incorrect storage of drug, No adverse event
Clinical narrative: This spontaneous report as received from a doctor of pharmacy refers to a patient of unknown age and gender. Pertinent medical history and drug reactions/allergies were not reported. On 30-AUG-2013, the patient was vaccinated with ZOSTAVAX (lot # J002777 and expiry date 07-JUN-2014) (dose and route were not reported). No concomitant medication was reported. The call was reported originally on 04-NOV-2013 in which the reporter requested the stability for an improperly stored ZOSTAVAX. At the time of the call it was reported that the ZOSTAVAX was exposed to 15F for an unspecified amount of hours but reported that no doses of ZOSTAVAX were administered. The reporter called back again on 05-NOV-2013, and stated that he thought that the ZOSTAVAX might had been stored improperly since May 2013 and that the temperature of the ZOSTAVAX had ranged between 15F and 20F for an unspecified amount of hours. At that time the reporter was unsure if the ZOSTAVAX was administered but stated that he thought the ZOSTAVAX would have been administered. On further investigation, the pharmacist reported that ZOSTAVAX had been improperly stored since about 10-OCT-2013 reaching a highest of 20F for a total time of 600 hours. It was reported that the patient had no adverse effect. Further investigation stated that the pharmacist had determined that this case might involve approximately 5 different Lots of ZOSTAVAX (details unspecified) stored improperly at temperatures up to 21F. He stated the time frame for the excursions would be as of the day each of the ZOSTAVAX Lots was received at his facility through the date of patient administration, which he believed might had been months, dating back to on an unknown date in May 2013. These involved approximately 40 patients. He had no specific breakdown of time frame as his record didn't indicate when he received each Lot but he was calling further for the data. He also could not identify, at this time, which Lot # was administered on which date. Pharmacist would call back after he had compiled all of the necessary information and would like revaccination recommendations for any excursion that could not be supported. Pharmacist stated there had been no adverse effects noted by any of the patients. The pharmacist faxed a spreadsheet which included the 38 patients names, the date of administration as well as the lot and expiration dates of the ZOSTAVAX which was unsupported an administrated. This is one of several reports from the same source. Additional information has been requested.
Sex: F
Vaccine: VARZOS
Symptoms: Incorrect storage of drug, No adverse event
Clinical narrative: This spontaneous report as received from a doctor of pharmacy refers to a patient of unknown age and gender. Pertinent medical history and drug reactions/allergies were not reported. On 11-SEP-2013, the patient was vaccinated with ZOSTAVAX (lot # J002777 and expiry date 07-JUN-2014) (dose and route were not reported). No concomitant medication was reported. The call was reported originally on 04-NOV-2013 in which the reporter requested the stability for an improperly stored ZOSTAVAX. At the time of the call it was reported that the ZOSTAVAX was exposed to 15F for an unspecified amount of hours but reported that no doses of ZOSTAVAX were administered. The reporter called back again on 05-NOV-2013, and stated that he thought that the ZOSTAVAX might had been stored improperly since May 2013 and that the temperature of the ZOSTAVAX had ranged between 15F and 20F for an unspecified amount of hours. At that time the reporter was unsure if the ZOSTAVAX was administered but stated that he thought the ZOSTAVAX would have been administered. On further investigation, the pharmacist reported that ZOSTAVAX had been improperly stored since about 10-OCT-2013 reaching a highest of 20F for a total time of 600 hours. It was reported that the patient had no adverse effect. Further investigation stated that the pharmacist had determined that this case might involve approximately 5 different Lots of ZOSTAVAX (details unspecified) stored improperly at temperatures up to 21F. He stated the time frame for the excursions would be as of the day each of the ZOSTAVAX Lots was received at his facility through the date of patient administration, which he believed might had been months, dating back to on an unknown date in May 2013. These involved approximately 40 patients. He had no specific breakdown of time frame as his record didn't indicate when he received each Lot but he was calling further for the data. He also could not identify, at this time, which Lot # was administered on which date. Pharmacist would call back after he had compiled all of the necessary information and would like revaccination recommendations for any excursion that could not be supported. Pharmacist stated there had been no adverse effects noted by any of the patients. The pharmacist faxed a spreadsheet which included the 38 patients names, the date of administration as well as the lot and expiration dates of the ZOSTAVAX which was unsupported an administrated. This is one of several reports from the same source. Additional information has been requested.