Sex: M
Vaccine: COVID19
Symptoms: COVID-19, Headache, Nasal congestion, Product administered to patient of inappropriate age, SARS-CoV-2 test
Clinical narrative: He received the first dose of the Pfizer Covid 19 vaccine on 13 May and then tested positive for Covid 19 on 19MAY2021; 15 year old patient received the first dose of the Pfizer Covid 19 vaccine on 13 May; he had a headache; stuffy nose; sinuses; change in sensation of taste; This is a spontaneous report from a contactable Physician. This Physician reported for a 15-year-old male patient (son). A 15-year-old male patient received bnt162b2 (PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 mRNA VACCINE, Solution for injection, Lot number: EW01 82 or 02), via an unspecified route of administration on 13May2021 at 11 am as 1st dose, single for COVID-19 immunization. Medical history and concomitant medications were not reported. On 12May2021, patient tested COVID-19 was negative. It was reported that patient received first dose of the Pfizer Covid 19 vaccine and tested COVID-19 was positive on 19May2021. He was asymptomatic. All were PCR tests. It was not clear on what to do regarding the scheduling of the second dose. When is it safe or advised to get the second dose. Patient experienced headache, stuffy nose and sinuses, change in sensation of taste. The taste was the only thing still going on and it is getting better. Caller's wife interrupted and stated no, their son said he had no symptoms and is asymptomatic. Prior vaccinations (within 4 weeks) If applicable, patient did not receive any other vaccinations within four weeks prior to the first administration date of the suspect vaccine. The pediatrician wasn't sure. What is the recommendation. Its a Pfizer product so is it up to the physician. Is there any different information for the 12-15 year old. This had been reported to the health department and the son's school, but it was not mentioned if it was reported through VAERS or anything. Caller confirmed he was calling because he wants to know if there was any guidance if he should delay the second dose. Caller added that the agent was not a nurse or a physician and that he appreciates that call handler is part of a different group. Caller stated that Pfizer has collected a lot of information from him which he is happy to share. Caller's wife can not read the card, she thinks it says EW01 82 or 02. It looks like an 82 but they are not sure. She does not know, maybe 8 or 0. Then, it just says Lot number and location. It was a clinic, and caller and his wife do not know the address or phone number. Caller and his wife were also not sure if it was the left or right arm. Caller thought it was left arm. Caller verbalizes frustration with the question and stated no, there was no causality it was just RNA how could he possibly get it. Caller's wife added to be clear, no, they do not think this is because of the vaccine. Caller stated obviously, obviously he was in contact with it because he got it from somewhere. Caller's wife states yes, he must have been in contact with someone. No treatment had been given. Caller stated, as he said, his son was asymptomatic. Caller added that he wants to know if they follow he 21 days or veers from that. He would like to speak to a nurse or a physician in medical information who deals with this. Caller's wife takes phone and stated that they understand they can not speak with someone off the bat, they were asking for something. Caller's wife stated that we should veer from the normal responses and escalate it because, as a mom, we should know what to do for her son right now. Caller's wife added that she understands that Pfizer as an organization is helpful. Caller's wife stated that call handler needs to veer from the normal script and escalate to a supervisor or speak to her human to human instead of from script. Caller disconnected prior to completing report and supplemental forms. It was reported that Pfizer covid19 vaccine: received first dose of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine 13MAY2021 and tested positive for Covid-19 on 19May2021 was unrelated. The patient did not received antipyretic treatment. The outcome of the events was unknown.    Follow-up attempts are needed. Further information is expected.