Title: Narrative theology and the hermeneutical virtues : humility, patience, prudence /
Authors: Goodson, Jacob L.,
Year: 2015
Subjects: Frei, Hans W.; Hauerwas, Stanley,; Frei, Hans W.; Hauerwas, Stanley,; Bible Hermeneutics.; Bible; Narrative theology.; Hermeneutics; Narrative theology
Abstract: In Narrative Theology and the Hermeneutical Virtues: Humility, Patience, Prudence, Jacob L. Goodson offers a philosophical analysis of the arguments and tendencies of Hans Frei’s and Stanley Hauerwas’ narrative theologies. Narrative theology names a way of doing theology and thinking theologically that is part of a greater movement called “the return to Scripture.” The return to Scripture movement makes a case for Scripture as the proper object of study within Christian theology, philosophy of religion, and religious ethics. While thinkers within this movement agree that Scripture is the proper object of study within philosophy and religious studies, there is major disagreement over what the word “narrative” describes in narrative theology. The Yale theologian, Hans Frei, argues that because Scripture is the proper object of study within Christian theology and the philosophy of religion, Scripture must be the exclusive object of study. To think theologically means paying as close attention as possible to the details of the biblical narratives in their “literal sense.” Different from Frei’s contentions, the Christian ethicist at Duke University, Stanley Hauerwas claims: if Scripture is the proper object of study within Christian theology, then the category of narrative teaches us that we ought to give our scholarly attention to the interpretations and performances of Scripture. Hauerwas emphasizes the continuity between the biblical narratives and the traditions of the church. This disagreement is best described as a hermeneutical one: Frei thinks that the primary place where interpretation happens is in the text; Hauerwas thinks that the primary place where interpretation occurs is in the community of interpreters. In order to move beyond the dichotomy found between Frei’s and Hauerwas’ work, but to remain within the return to Scripture movement, Goodson constructs three hermeneutical virtues:
Contents: Part I. Hermeneutics within narrative theology. What is narrative theology? : Hans Frei, Stanley hauerwas, and the hermeneutical task -- What is modern philosophy's impact on hermeneutics? : the role of modern philosophy in Hans Frei's The eclipse of biblical narrative -- Part II. Empiricism, science, and theological hermeneutics. Against Spinoza : what kind of science does hermeneutics require? -- Against Locke : what kind of empiricism should theological hermeneutics adopt? -- Can narrative theology meet the demands of novelty? : the case of Peter Ochs -- Part III. A virtue-centered science of interpretation. Who do scientists of interpretation serve? -- What kind of readers should scientists of interpreters be? -- Conclusion: The scientific bases of dogmatic or philosophical theology.