chhatramani/Nepal-Legal-Text-Corpus-44laws huggingface dataset:
Arbitration Act 2055

Chapter- 4 Arbitration Proceedings and Powers of Arbitrators

Section 22: Parties to have Equal Opportunity
1) Each party shall be provided with an equal and adequate opportunity in the arbitration proceedings to present its case subject to this Act.
2) Any party may attend the arbitration proceedings either in person or by proxy and also designate a legal practitioner on its behalf.

Arbitration Act 2055

Chapter- 4 Arbitration Proceedings and Powers of Arbitrators

Section 23: Assistance of the Court May be Sought to Examine Any Evidence
Notwithstanding anything contained in the prevailing law, in case the arbitrator requires the assistance of the court to examine any evidence concerning a dispute under consideration, the arbitrator him/herself may, on his/her own or at the request of any party, request the District Court for such assistance. In case any such request is received, the District Court shall provide assistance in examining the evidence according to the prevailing law.

Arbitration Act 2055

Chapter- 5 Decision of the Arbitrator and Implementation

Section 24: Period Within Which Decision Must Be Taken
Except when otherwise provided for in the agreement, the arbitrator shall pronounce the decision ordinarily within 120 days from the date of submission of documents under Section 14 pursuant to sub-section (7) of Section 17.

Arbitration Act 2055

Chapter- 5 Decision of the Arbitrator and Implementation

Section 25: Circumstances in Which Decisions Must Not Be Taken
1) In case any issue requiring arbitration is found to be inextricably linked with any other issue on which the arbitrator cannot pronounce the decision, the arbitration shall not pronounce the decision on that issue.
2) In a situation in which the arbitrator cannot take a decision pursuant to sub-section (1), the arbitration must inform the concerned parties accordingly.
3) The concerned party may file a complaint to the Court within 35 days from the date of receipt of a notice pursuant to sub-section (2), Notwithstanding anything contained in the prevailing law.

Arbitration Act 2055

Chapter- 5 Decision of the Arbitrator and Implementation

Section 26: Decision of Arbitrator
1) In case there are three more arbitrators, the decision of the majority shall be deemed to be the decision of arbitration.
2) In case the arbitrators have dissenting opinions so that the majority (opinion) cannot be ascertained, the opinion of the chief arbitrator shall be deemed to be the decision of arbitration, except when otherwise provided for in the agreement.
3) Every arbitrator must affix a signature on the decision subject to sub-section (4).
Provided that in case there is any special reason why any arbitrator cannot affix a signature on the decision, the other arbitrators shall affix their signatures explicitly mentioning the reason.
4) In case any arbitrator does not agree with the decision of arbitration, he/she may express his/her dissenting opinion.
Arbitration Act 2055

Chapter- 5 Decision of the Arbitrator and Implementation

Section 27: Matters to be Mentioned in Decision
The arbitrator must explicitly mention the following matters in the decision, except when otherwise provided for in the agreement:
(a) Brief particulars of the matter referred to for arbitration.
(b) In case any party has questioned the jurisdiction of arbitration, the grounds for deciding that the matter falls under the jurisdiction of arbitration are as follows:
(c) The arbitrator’s decision and the reasons and grounds for reaching that decision.
(d) Claims which must be realised or amounts which must be compensated.
(e) Interest on the amount to be realised and the additional interest rate to be charged after the expiry of the time limit for implementing the decision of the arbitrator in the event of the limit mentioned in section 31.
(f) Place and date of decision.

Arbitration Act 2055

Chapter- 5 Decision of the Arbitrator and Implementation

Section 28: Decision to be Read Out
The arbitrator shall read out the decision in the presence of the concerned parties, hand over a copy of that decision to each party, and keep evidence thereof in the case file. In case any party is
absent at the time fixed for reading out the decision or refuses to accept a copy of the decision even after being present at the time fixed for reading out the decision, a notice shall be furnished to him/her along with a copy of the decision after indicating the same.
Arbitration Act 2055

Chapter- 5 Decision of the Arbitrator and Implementation

Section 29: Prohibition to Revision of Decision
1) Except the Appellate Court has issued an order under Section 30, the arbitrator shall not take another decision on the matter referred to him/her for arbitration after once reading out his decision on the matter, except correcting arithmetic, printing, typing or similar other minor errors and inserting omitted particulars without prejudice to the substance of the decision.
2) In case any party observes that any mistake contained in the decision of the arbitrator needs to be corrected pursuant to sub-section (1), one must submit an application to the arbitrator within 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the decision. In case the arbitrator deems it appropriate to correct such mistakes or insert any omitted particulars, he/she may prepare a separate note thereof and have the omitted particulars inserted or mistake corrected within 15 days from the date of receipt of the application. In case the arbitrator the deems it appropriate to make such
correction, he/she must do so by preparing a note and informing the parties accordingly within 30 days from the decision date.
3) Notwithstanding anything contained elsewhere in this Section, in case the arbitrator has not taken a decision on any point from among the points contained in the claims made by any party, the concerned party may submit an application for a decision on the point to the extent of the matter covered by it after securing the approval of the other party within 30 days from the date of decision by the arbitrator. In case such an application is received, a supplementary decision may be taken by confining in to the matter covered by the point within 45 days from the date of application.
4) If the parties agree, any party may, by notifying the other party, request the arbitrator to explain any point contained in or any part of the arbitrator’s decision which is not clear within 30 days from the decision date. In case any such request is received, the arbitrator may explain and clarify any unclear point within 45 days.
Arbitration Act 2055

Chapter- 5 Decision of the Arbitrator and Implementation

Section 30: Circumstances in Which Decision May Be Invalidated
1) Any party dissatisfied with the decision taken by the arbitrator may if one wishes to invalidate the decision, file a petition to the Appellate Court along with the related documents and a copy of the decision within 35 days from the date the decision was heard or notice received thereof under this Act. The petition shall also supply a copy of that petition to the arbitrator and the other party.
2) In case a petition is filed pursuant to sub-section (1), the Appellate Court may, in case the petitioner proves that the arbitration decision contains any of the following matters, invalidate that decision or issue an order to have a fresh decision taken as per necessity:
(a) In case any party to the agreement was incompetent for any reason to sign the agreement at the time of signing the agreement, or in case the agreement is not valid under the law of that the nation which governs jurisdiction over the parties, or in case such law is not clear and agreement is not valid under the laws of Nepal.
(b) In case the due petition was not given a notice to appoint an arbitrator or about the arbitration proceedings in time.
(c) In case the decision has been taken on a disputed matter which had not been referred to the arbitrator, or in a manner contrary to the conditions prescribed for the arbitrator, or by acting beyond the jurisdiction prescribed for the arbitrator.
(d) Except when an agreement has been signed contrary to the laws of Nepal, in case the procedure of designation of arbitrators or their functions and actions do not conform to the agreement signed between the parties, or in case there is no such agreement it has not been done as per this Act.
3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (2), the Appellate Court may invalidate the decision of the arbitrator in the following circumstances in case a petition is filed pursuant to sub-section (1):
(a) In case the dispute settled by the arbitrator cannot be settled through arbitration under the laws of Nepal.
(b) In case the decision taken by the arbitrator is likely to prove detrimental to the public interests or policies.

Arbitration Act 2055

Chapter- 5 Decision of the Arbitrator and Implementation

Section 31: Implementation of Award
The concerned parties shall be under obligation to implement the award of the arbitrator within 45 days from the date when they receive a copy thereof.

Arbitration Act 2055

Chapter- 5 Decision of the Arbitrator and Implementation

Section 32: Implementation of Award by Court
In case an award cannot be implemented within the time limit prescribed in Section 31 of this Act, the concerned party may file a petition to the District Court within 30 days from the date of expiry of the time limit prescribed for that purpose to implement the award In case such a petition is filed, the District Court shall implement the award ordinarily within 30 days as if it was its own judgment.
Arbitration Act 2055

Chapter- 5 Decision of the Arbitrator and Implementation

Section 33: Interest to be Paid
Except when otherwise provided for in the agreement, in case the arbitrator has taken an award providing for the payment of any amount by one party to another, the concerned party shall also pay interest at the rate prescribed by the arbitrator in the light also of the nature of the business related to the dispute and by ensuring that it is not higher than the rate of interest currently charged by commercial banks in respect to similar transactions.
Provided that no interest shall be charged for the period between the date of the decision by the arbitrator and the time limit prescribed for the implementation of the award under this Act.
Arbitration Act 2055

Chapter- 5 Decision of the Arbitrator and Implementation

Section 34: Implementation of Award Taken in a Foreign Country
1) A party which willing to implement an award made in a foreign country in Nepal shall submit an application to the Appellate Court along with the following documents:
(a) The original or certified copy of the arbitrators award.
(b) The original or certified copy of the agreement.
(c) In case the arbitrators award is not in the Nepali Language, an official translation thereof is in the Nepali language.
2) In case Nepal is a party to any treaty which provides for recognition and implementation of decisions taken by arbitrators in foreign countries, any decision taken by an arbitrator after the commencement of this act within the area of the foreign country which is a party to that treaty shall be recognised and implemented in Nepal in the following circumstances subject to the provisions of that treaty and the conditions mentioned at the time of entering into the treaty.
(a) In case the arbitrator has been appointed and the award is made according to the laws and procedures mentioned in the agreement,
(b) In case the parties have been notified about the arbitration proceedings in time,
(c) In case the decision has been taken according to the conditions mentioned in the agreement or upon confining only to the subject matters referred to the arbitrator.
(d) In case the decision has become final and binding on the parties according to the laws of the country where the decision has been taken.
(e) In case the laws of the country of the petitioner or the laws of the country where arbitration proceedings have been conducted, do not contain provision under which arbitration award taken in Nepal cannot be implemented.
(f) In case the application has been filed for the implementation of the award within 90 days from the date of award.
3) In case the Appellate Court is satisfied that the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) have been fulfilled in the application filed pursuant to sub-section (1), it shall forward the award to the District Court for its implementation.
4) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Section, no award made by an arbitrator in a foreign country shall be implemented in the following circumstances.
(a) In case the awarded settled dispute cannot be settled through arbitration under the laws of Nepal.
(b) In case the implementation of the award is detrimental to the public policy.

Arbitration Act 2055

Chapter-6 Miscellaneous

Section 35: Cost of Arbitration Proceedings
1) Except when otherwise provided for in the agreement, the parties seeking arbitration must pay to the arbitrator the amount fixed in consultation with the parties for conducting the arbitration proceedings.
2) Except the otherwise provided in the agreement, each party shall bear the expenses required for the arbitration proceedings in the proportion prescribed by the arbitrator, taking into account the relevant circumstances.
Arbitration Act 2055

Chapter-6 Miscellaneous

Section 42: Case Files Relating to Arbitrator
1) The arbitrator shall prepare a case file containing documents, evidence, a statement of the concerned person’s award, and all other documents connected with the arbitration, mentioning the date and time in chronological order.
2) After the finalisation of the arbitration proceedings, the arbitrator shall submit the concerned case file to the District Court.
3) The District Court shall keep the case-file received pursuant to sub-section (2) as safely as it keeps the case-files of its judgments.
4) Notwithstanding anything contained in the prevailing law, no copy of the award and documents related thereto shall be given to any person other than the concerned parties without their approval.

Arbitration Act 2055

Chapter-6 Miscellaneous

Section 43: Power to Frame Rules
The Supreme Court may frame necessary Rules with respect to the procedure of regulating the functions to be discharged by courts under this Act.

Arbitration Act 2055

Chapter-6 Miscellaneous

Section 44: Repeal and Saving
1) The Arbitration Act of 2038 has been repealed.
2) In the case of an arbitration whose proceedings have been started prior to the commencement of this Act, 2041, the procedure laid down in the 2041 Arbitration Act itself shall be adopted.
3) The Time limit and grounds for filing an appeal against an award decided through arbitration under the Arbitration Act, 2038 shall be as mentioned in the Act.
मध्यस्थता ऐन २०५५

प्रस्तावना
लालमोहर र प्रकाशन मिति
२०५६।१।२।५
संशोधन गर्ने ऐन                                                  प्रमाणीकरण र प्रकाशन मिति
१. केही नेपाल ऐनलाई संशोधन गर्ने ऐन, २०६४                       २०६४।५।९
२. गणतत्र सुदृढीकरण तथा केही नेपाल कानून                        २०६६।१०।७
संशोधन गने ऐन, २०६६
२०५६ सालको ऐन नं. १
मध्यस्थता सम्बन्धमा कानूनी व्यवस्था गर्न बनेको ऐन
प्रस्तावना: मध्यस्थता सम्बन्धी प्रचलित कानूनी व्यवस्थालाई समयानुकूल बनाउन वाञ्छनीय भएकोले,
श्री ५ महाराजाधिराज वीरेन्द्र वीर विक्रम शाहदेवको शासनकालको सत्ताइसौं वर्षमा संसदले यो ऐन बनाएको छ ।

मध्यस्थता ऐन २०५५

परिच्छेद -१ प्रारम्भिक

दफा १ः संक्षिप्त नाम र प्रारम्भ
१) यस ऐनको नाम “मध्यस्थता ऐन, २०५५” रहेको छ।
२) यो ऐन तुरुन्त प्रारम्भ हुनेछ।

मध्यस्थता ऐन २०५५

परिच्छेद -१ प्रारम्भिक

दफा २ः परिभाषा
विषय वा प्रसङ्गले अर्को अर्थ नलागेमा यस ऐनमाः
(क) “सम्झौता” भन्नाले करार भएको वा नभएको कुनै निश्चित कानूनी सम्बन्धका विषयमा तत्काल उठेको वा भविष्यमा उठ्न सक्ने विवादलाई मध्यस्थताद्वारा समाधान गराउनको लागि पक्षहरु बीच भएको लिखित सहमति सम्झनु पर्छ।
स्पष्टीकरण: यस खण्डको प्रयोजनको लागि देहायका कुनै लिखत भएमा पक्षहरु बीच लिखित सहमति भएको मानिनेछः-
(१) मध्यस्थको प्रावधान समेत व्यवस्था गरी भएको कुनै करार वा तत्सम्बन्धमा भएको अन्य कुनै छुट्टै सम्झौता,
(२) मध्यस्थलाई विवाद सुम्पने “गरी पक्षहरु बीच आदान प्रदान भएको पत्र, टेलेक्स, टेलिग्राम, टेलिफ्याक्स वा लिखित अभिलेख रहन सक्ने त्यस्तै प्रकतिका अन्य दूरसञ्चार माध्यमहरु,
(३) कुनै पक्षले कुनै विवाद मध्यस्थलाई सुम्पने गरी दावी पेश गरेकोमा सो दावी उपर प्रतिवाद गर्ने पक्षले मध्यस्थलाई विवाद सुम्पने सम्बन्धमा इन्कार नगरी पेश भएको प्रतिवाद।
(ख) “पक्ष” भन्नाले मध्यस्थतासँग सम्बन्धित कुनै पक्ष सम्झनु पर्छ।
(ग) “जिल्ला अदालत” भन्नाले सम्झौतामा मध्यस्थता हुने ठाउँतोकिएकोमा सो ठाउँको र त्यस्तो ठाउँनतोकिएकोमा विवाद उत्पन्न भएको वा मध्यस्थताको कारबाही र निर्णय भएको वा साधारणतया कुनै पक्ष बसोबास गरी आएको ठाउँको प्रादेशिक क्षेत्राधिकार भएको जिल्ला अदालत सम्झनु पर्छ।
(घ) “उच्च अदालत” भन्नाले सम्झौतामा मध्यस्थता हुने ठाउँ तोकिएकोमा सो ठाउँको र त्यस्तो ठाउँनतोकिएकोमा विवाद उत्पन्न भएको वा मध्यस्थताको कारबाही र निर्णय भएको वा कुनै पक्ष साधारणतया बसोबास गरी आएको
ठाउँको प्रादेशिक क्षेत्राधिकार भएको उच्च अदालत सम्झनु पर्छ।
(ङ) “बिवाद” भन्नाले यस ऐन बमोजिम मध्यस्थताद्वारा “समाधान हुन सक्ने विवाद सम्झनु पर्छ।
(च) “प्रतिदावी” भन्नाले दावी गर्ने पक्ष उपर प्रतिवाद गर्ने पक्षले गरेको दावी सम्झनु पर्छ।
(छ) प्रत्युक्ति” भन्नाले प्रतिवादी विरुद्ध दावी गर्ने पक्षले गरेको प्रतिवाद सम्झनु पर्छ।
(ज) “मध्यस्थ” भन्नाले विवाद समाधानको लागि नियुक्त मध्यस्थ सम्झनु पर्छर सो शब्दले मध्यस्थहरुको समूह समेतलाई जनाउँछ ।

मध्यस्थता ऐन २०५५

परिच्छेद -२ मध्यस्थताद्वारा विवादको समाधान

दफा ३ः मध्यस्थताद्वारा विवाद समाधान गराउनु पर्ने
१) कुनै सम्झौतामा मध्यस्थताद्वारा विवाद समाधान गरिने व्यवस्था भएकोमा त्यस्तो सम्झौता वा सो अन्तर्गतका विषयसँग सम्बन्धित विवाद सम्झौतामा नै कार्यविधि उल्लेख भएकोमा सोही बमोजिम र नभएकोमा यस ऐन बमोजिम मध्यस्थताद्वारा समाधान गराउनु पर्नेछ।
२) उपदफा (१) मा जुनसुकै कुरा लेखिएको भए तापनि अदालतमा दायर भएको प्रचलित कानून बमोजिम मिलापत्र हुन सक्ने व्यापारिक प्रकृतिको कुनै देवानी मुद्दा सम्बन्धित पक्षहरुले मध्यस्थताद्वारा समाधान गरी पाउँभनी निवेदन दिएमा त्यस्तो विवाद समेत मध्यस्थताद्वारा समाधान गराउनु पर्नेछ।
मध्यस्थता ऐन २०५५

परिच्छेद -२ मध्यस्थताद्वारा विवादको समाधान

दफा ४ः मुद्दाको लगत काट्ने
१) दफा २ को उपदफा (२) बमोजिम मध्यस्थताद्वारा समाधान गराउन चाहेको विवादको विषयमा दायर रहेको मुद्दाको लगत काट्न अदालतले आदेश दिन सक्नेछ।
२) उपदफा (१) मा जुनसुकै कुरा लेखिएको भए तापनि देहायको अवस्थामा अदालतले मुद्दाको लगत काट्ने आदेश दिने छैनः-
(क) मध्यस्थता हुनसक्ने विषयको साथ साथै मध्यस्थता हुन नसक्ने विषयमा पनि निर्णय दिनुपर्ने देखिएमा, वा
(ख) मध्यस्थताद्वारा विवादको निर्णय हुन नसक्ने कुनै मनासिब कारण देखिएमा।

मध्यस्थता ऐन २०५५

परिच्छेद -३ मध्यस्थको नियुक्ति र कार्यालय

दफा ५ः मध्यस्थको संख्या
१) सम्झौतामा मध्यस्थको संख्या तोकिएकोमा सोही बमोजिम र नतोकिएकोमा सामान्यतया तीनजना मध्यस्थहरु रहनेछन्‌ ।
२) सम्झौता बमोजिम नियुक्त भएका मध्यस्थहरुको संख्या सम भएमा त्यस्ता मध्यस्थहरुले रोजेको कुने एक व्यक्ति थपी मध्यस्थको संख्या विषम गर्नु पर्नेछ ।

मध्यस्थता ऐन २०५५

परिच्छेद -३ मध्यस्थको नियुक्ति र कार्यालय

दफा ६ः मध्यस्थको नियुक्ति
१) सम्झौतामा अन्यथा व्यवस्था भएकोमा बाहेक मध्यस्थताद्वारा विवादको समाधान गराउनु पर्ने कारण उत्पन्न भएको मितिले तीन महिनाभित्र मध्यस्थ नियुक्त गर्ने प्रकृया शुरु गर्नु पर्नेछ ।
२) सम्झौतामा मध्यस्थ हुने व्यक्तिको नाम उल्लेख भएकोमा सम्झौतामा उल्लिखित व्यक्ति नै मध्यस्थ नियुक्त भएको मानिनेछ ।
३) सम्झौतामा मध्यस्थ नियुक्त गर्ने सम्बन्धमा कुनै छुट्टै व्यवस्था भएको रहेछ भने सोही बमोजिम मध्यस्थ नियुक्त गरिनेछ ।
४) सम्झौतामा अन्यथा व्यवस्था भएकोमा बाहेक प्रत्येक पक्षले एक एकजना मध्यस्थ नियुक्त गर्नेछन्‌ र त्यसरी नियुक्त भएका मध्यस्थहरुद्वारा नियुक्त तेस्रो मध्यस्थले मुख्य मध्यस्थ भई काम गर्नेछ ।

मध्यस्थता ऐन २०५५

परिच्छेद -३ मध्यस्थको नियुक्ति र कार्यालय

दफा ७ः अदालतद्वारा मध्यस्थको नियुक्ति
१) देहायको अवस्थामा कुनै पक्षले मध्यस्थको नियुक्तिको लागि उच्च अदालतमा निवेदन दिन सक्नेछः-
(क) सम्झौतामा उल्लेख भएको प्रकृया अपनाउँदा मध्यस्थ नियुक्त हुन नसकेमा ।
(ख) सम्झौतामा मध्यस्थ नियुक्ति गर्ने सम्बन्धमा कुनै कुरा उल्लेख नभएमा ।
२) उपदफा (१) बमोजिम दिइने निवेदनमा मध्यस्थ हुन सक्ने कम्तीमा तीनजना व्यक्तिको नाम, थर, वतन, पेशा र निजको विशेषज्ञताको क्षेत्र समेत खुलाउनु पर्नेछ र त्यस्तो निवेदन साथ सम्झौताको प्रतिलिपि समेत पेश गर्नु पर्नेछ ।
३) उपदफा (१) बमोजिम निवेदन प्राप्त भएपछि उच्च अदालतले सबै पक्षलाई सूचना दिई मध्यस्थ हुने व्यक्तिका सम्बन्धमा सम्बन्धित सबै पक्षको मतैक्य भएमा तिनीहरुले प्रस्ताव गरेको व्यक्तिलाई र मतैक्य हुन नसकेमा उच्च अदालतले उपयुक्त ठहस्याएको व्यक्तिलाई त्यस्तो निवेदन प्राप्त भएको साठी दिनभित्र मध्यस्थ नियुक्त गर्नेछ । त्यसरी उच्च अदालतले गरेको निर्णय अन्तिम हुनेछ ।

मध्यस्थता ऐन २०५५

परिच्छेद -३ मध्यस्थको नियुक्ति र कार्यालय

दफा ८ः विषेश परिस्थितिमा मध्यस्थको पूर्ति
१) मध्यस्थताको लागि नियुक्त भएको कुनै मध्यस्थले राजीनामा दिएमा वा मध्यस्थ हुन इन्कार गरेमा वा निजको मृत्यु भएमा वा अन्य कुनै कारणले निजको स्थान रिक्त हुन गएमा त्यसरी स्थान रिक्त भएको साधारणतः तीस दिनभित्र सो स्थान निज नियुक्त हुँदाकै प्रकृया अनुसार अर्को मध्यस्थ नियुक्त गरी पूर्ति गरिनेछ।
२) उपदफा (१) बमोजिमको म्यादभित्र मध्यस्थको रिक्त स्थानको पूर्ति हुन नसकेमा त्यस्तो म्याद नाघेको पन्ध्र दिनभित्र कुनै पक्षले उच्च अदालतमा निवेदन दिन सक्नेछ । त्यस्तो निवेदन परेकोमा साधारणतः पन्ध्र दिनभित्र उच्च अदालतले दफा ७ को अधीनमा रही मध्यस्थ नियुक्त गरिदिनु पर्नेछ।
मध्यस्थता ऐन २०५५

परिच्छेद -३ मध्यस्थको नियुक्ति र कार्यालय

दफा ९ः मध्यस्थले शपथ लिनुपर्ने
१) मध्यस्थताको काम कारबाही शुरु गर्नु अघि मध्यस्थले अनुसूचीमा उल्लेख भए अनुसार निष्पक्षता तथा इमान्दारिताको दुई प्रति लिखित शपथमा दस्तखत गर्नु पर्नेछ र त्यस्तो शपथको एक प्रति मिसिल साथ राखी अर्को एक प्रति उच्च अदालतमा पठाउनु पर्नेछ ।
२) कुनै पनि मध्यस्थले उपदफा (१) बमोजिम शपथ लिनु अघि निजले समाधान गर्नुपर्ने विवादका सम्बन्धमा -निजको निष्पक्षता वा स्वतन्त्रताका सम्बन्धमा मनासिब माफिकको शंका गर्नुपर्ने कुनै कुरा भएमा सो कुरा सम्बन्धित पक्षहरुको जानकारीमा ल्याउनु पर्नेछ ।

मध्यस्थता ऐन २०५५

परिच्छेद -३ मध्यस्थको नियुक्ति र कार्यालय

दफा १०ः मध्यस्थको अयोग्यता
देहायको व्यक्ति मध्यस्थ नियुक्त हुनको निमित्त योग्य हुने छैनः-
(क) प्रचलित कानून बमोजिम करार गर्न अयोग्य भएको,
(ख) नैतिक पतन देखिने फौजदारी कसूरमा अदालतबाट सजाय पाएको,
(ग) साहुको दामासाहीमा परेको वा टाट उल्टेको,
(घ) मध्यस्थताद्वारा समाधान हुनुपर्ने विवादको विषयमा कुनै स्वार्थ भएको,
(ङ) कुनै सम्झौतामा मध्यस्थ नियुक्त हुनको लागि कुनै खास योग्यता तोकिएको रहेछ भने त्यस्तो योग्यता नपुगेको ।

मध्यस्थता ऐन २०५५

परिच्छेद -३ मध्यस्थको नियुक्ति र कार्यालय

दफा ११ः मध्यस्थलाई हटाउन सकिने
१) मध्यस्थलाई हटाउने अवस्था र कार्यविधि सम्झौतामा उल्लेख भए बमोजिम हुनेछ ।
२) उपदफा (१) बमोजिम सम्झौतामा अवस्था र कार्यविधि उल्लेख नगरिएको भए देहायको कुनै अवस्थामा मध्यस्थलाई हटाई पाउँभनी कुनै पक्षले मध्यस्थ नियुक्त भएको वा निजको काम कारबाही यस उपदफा बमोजिम नभएको थाहा पाएको मितिले पन्ध्र दिनभित्र मध्यस्थ समक्ष निवेदन दिन सक्नेछ:-
(क)कुनै मध्यस्थले निष्पक्ष रुपले काम नगरी कुनै पपक्षप्रति झुकाव राखेको वा पक्षपात गरेको स्पष्ट देखिएमा,
(ख) कुनै मध्यस्थले मध्यस्थताको कारबाहीमा अनुचित आचरण वा जालसाज गरेमा,
(ग) कुनै मध्यस्थले मध्यस्थता सम्बन्धी कारबाहीमा बराबर बुटि वा अनियमितता गरेमा,
(घ) कुनै मध्यस्थले मध्यस्थताको काम कारबाही अनुचित रुपमा लम्ब्याउने वा ढिलाई गर्ने उद्देश्यले मनासिब माफिकको कारण नदेखाई तीनपटकभन्दा बढी मध्यस्थको बैठकमा उपस्थित नभएमा वा बैठकको काम कारबाहीमा भाग लिन इन्कार गरेमा,
(ङ) कुनै मध्यस्थले प्राकृतिक न्यायको सिद्धान्त वा नियमको प्रतिकूल हुने कार्य गरेमा, वा
(च) कुनै मध्यस्थको योग्यता नपुगेको भएमा वा योग्यता नरहेमा।
३) उपदफा (२) बमोजिम निवेदन पर्न आएमा हटाउन माग गरिएको मध्यस्थले स्वेच्छाले पद त्याग नगरेमा वा हटाउन माग गरेका आधार उपर अर्को पक्ष सहमत नभएमा मध्यस्थले सो सम्बन्धमा निवेदन परेको तीस दिनभित्र निर्णय गर्नु पर्नेछ ।
४) उपदफा (३) बमोजिमको निर्णय उपर उच्च अदालतमा उजूर लाग्नेछ र सो अदालतले गरेको आदेश अन्तिम हुनेछ।

मध्यस्थता ऐन २०५५

परिच्छेद -३ मध्यस्थको नियुक्ति र कार्यालय

दफा १२ः मध्यस्थको कार्यालय रहने स्थान
१) मध्यस्थको कार्यालय देहायको स्थानमा रहनेछ:-
(क) सम्झौतामा मध्यस्थको कार्यालय रहने स्थान उल्लेख भएकोमा सोही स्थानमा ।
(ख) सम्झौतामा मध्यस्थको कार्यालय रहने स्थान उल्लेख नभएकोमा पक्षहरुले रोजेको स्थानमा ।
(ग) मध्यस्थ नियुक्त भएको पन्ध्र दिनभित्र पक्षहरुले त्यस्तो स्थान नरोजेमा वा त्यस सम्बन्धमा पक्षहरुका बीच मतैक्य नभएमा सम्पूर्ण सम्बद्ध परिस्थितिलाई विचार गरी मध्यस्थले तोकेको स्थानमा ।
२) यस दफामा अन्यत्र जुनसुकै कुरा लेखिएको भए तापनि पक्षहरुले अन्यथा व्यवस्था गरेकोमा बाहेक साक्षीको बकपत्र गराउन, विशेषज्ञको राय लिन, कुनै लिखत, वस्तु वा स्थान निरीक्षण गर्न सुविधा हुने अन्य कुनै उपयुक्त स्थानमा समेत मध्यस्थहरुले आपसमा छलफल गरी मुकाम तोक्न सक्नेछन्‌ ।