premise: The agreement is named after the diamond-mining city in South Africa and went into effect January 1 2003.
  The assembly, noting that the trade in conflict diamonds remains "a matter of serious international concern, which can be directly linked to the fueling of armed conflict ... reaffirms its strong and continuing support for the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme and the Kimberley Process as a whole."
  The resolution also recognized that the certification can help ensure that UN Security Council resolutions containing sanctions on the trade in conflict diamonds are carried out, while helping to prevent future conflicts.
  In his briefing to the assembly, Mogae highlighted a 2006 progress report on the Kimberley Process, which concluded that it was working well although there were still some problems, particularly in Ivory Coast and South America.
  Some of Ivory Coast's neighbors are not parties to the Kimberley Process, which has therefore limited influence over them.
  
  "The Kimberley Process views the problem of leakage diamonds from (Ivory Coast) into the legitimate trade as one that may require a regional approach to resolve," the report said.
   What could happen if there is no certification process?
hypothesis: future conflicts