chengyewang/TexOCR-eval huggingface dataset:
\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{lrrr}
 & Total & Recurring & Non-Recurring \\
\hline
\multicolumn{4}{l}{Funds Available 1989--90} \\
Balance Forward From 1988--89 & 427.0 & 0.0 & 427.0 \\
Estimated Revenues & 596.5 & 596.5 & 0.0 \\
Midyear Reversions & 0.5 & 0.0 & 0.5 \\
Fixed Capital Outlay Reversions & 0.2 & 0.0 & 0.2 \\
Transfer of Retained Earnings & 41.9 & 0.0 & 41.9 \\
Interest Earnings & 10.5 & 10.5 & 0.0 \\
Total 89--90 Funds Available & 1,076.6 & 607.0 & 469.6 \\
\hline
\multicolumn{4}{l}{Effective Appropriations 89--90} \\
Operations & 490.8 & 175.2 & 315.6 \\
Aid to Local Government & 492.1 & 418.2 & 73.9 \\
Fixed Capital Outlay & 12.9 & 0.0 & 12.9 \\
FCO/Aid to Local Government & 0.0 & 0.0 & 0.0 \\
Base Student Allocation Guarantee & 20.0 & 0.0 & 20.0 \\
Total 88--89 Eff. Appropriations & 1,015.8 & 593.4 & 422.4 \\
\hline
Available Reserves & 60.8 & 13.6 & 47.2 \\
\hline
\multicolumn{4}{l}{Funds Available 1990--91} \\
Balance Forward From 1989--90 & 60.8 & 0.0 & 60.8 \\
Estimated Revenues (A) & 619.9 & 619.9 & 0.0 \\
Midyear Reversions & 0.5 & 0.0 & 0.5 \\
Fixed Capital Outlay Reversions & 0.2 & 0.0 & 0.2 \\
Unused Appropriations & 2.2 & 0.0 & 2.2 \\
Adjustment Per S1525 (A) & 0.0 & 0.0 & 0.0 \\
Interest Earnings & 4.1 & 4.1 & 0.0 \\
Total 90--91 Funds Available & 687.7 & 624.0 & 63.7 \\
\hline
\multicolumn{4}{l}{Appropriations Base From 89--90} \\
Operations & 175.2 & 175.2 & 0.0 \\
Aid to Local Government & 418.3 & 418.3 & 0.0 \\
Other & 0.0 & 0.0 & 0.0 \\
Total 89--90 Appropriations Base & 593.5 & 593.5 & 0.0 \\
\hline
Available Reserves & 94.2 & 30.5 & 63.7 \\
\end{tabular}
\label{table_1}
\end{table}
\section{Instrument Specification}

\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{ll}
\hline
Specification & Design value \\
\hline
Field-of-View (hexagon) & $\sim$4.8 degree$^2$ ($\varnothing > 2.7^{\circ}$) \\
Multiplex fiber positioner & $\sim$2400 \\
Medium Resolution Spectrographs (2x) & R$\sim$5000--7000 \\
\# Fibres & 1600 fibres \\
Passband & 390--930 nm \\
Velocity accuracy & $< 2$ km/s \\
High Resolution Spectrograph (1x) & R$\sim$20,000 \\
\# Fibres & 800 fibres \\
Passband & 392--437 \& 515--572 \& 605--675 nm \\
Velocity accuracy & $< 1$ km/s \\
\# of fibers in $\varnothing=2'$ circle & $>3$ \\
Fibre diameter & $\varnothing = 1.4$ arcsec \\
Area (first 5 year survey) & $>2$h $\times$ 16,000 degree$^2$ \\
Number of science spectra (5 year) & $\sim$75 million of 20 min \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\section{Chattanooga State Community College: 2021 Student Success Profile}

\subsection{Success at Chattanooga State}
1,473 Degrees \& Certificates Awarded in 2019--20

51.5\% First-Year Retention Rate for the 2018 Cohort

22.0\% Three-Year Graduation Rate for the 2017 Cohort

\subsection{First-Time, Full-Time Freshmen}
\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\caption{First-Time, Full-Time Freshmen Cohort Characteristics}
\label{table_1}
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
 & Fall 2015 & Fall 2016 & Fall 2017 & Fall 2018 & Fall 2019 \\
Total Cohort & 1,837 students & 1,600 students & 1,589 students & 1,722 students & 1,590 students \\
White & 76\% & 74\% & 74\% & 73\% & 67\% \\
Black & 14\% & 14\% & 14\% & 13\% & 17\% \\
Hispanic & 4\% & 7\% & 7\% & 7\% & 10\% \\
Pell Recipients & 57\% & 58\% & 57\% & 57\% & 60\% \\
ACT Below 19 & 40\% & 39\% & 39\% & 37\% & 42\%
\end{tabular}
\end{table}

The first-time, full-time cohort includes degree-seeking students who enroll in college for the first time in fall (or in the prior summer and continued in the fall) and attempted at least 12 hours.

\subsection{Three-Year Graduation Rate}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
\includegraphics{figure_1.pdf}
\caption{Three-Year Graduation Rate for Cohorts 2013--16 through 2017--20. Reported values are 13\%, 17\%, 20\%, 21\%, and 22\%.}
\label{figure_1}
\end{figure}

\subsection{Success for the 2017 Freshman Cohort}
23\% Graduated from Any College

12\% Transferred to Another Institution

14\% Still Enrolled after 3 Years

Success for the 2017 cohort includes the percent of students who earned a degree or certificate from any institution within or outside the TBR system, transferred to another institution, or were still enrolled as of summer 2020.

\subsection{Cumulative Graduation Rate}
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
\includegraphics{figure_2.pdf}
\caption{Cumulative graduation rate across calendar semesters for cohorts from 2011 to 2018.}
\label{figure_2}
\end{figure}

Calendar Semesters
\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{lccc}
Data set & $n$ & $m$ & Ratio \\
Cancer & 3.9k & 217 & 1.14 \\
Amazon & 500k & 10k & 1.76 \\
Muscle & 220k & 22k & 2.47 \\
\end{tabular}
\caption{Timing the Hessian bound optimization scheme.}
\label{tab:table_2}
\end{table}

\section{Software}

We provide two software solutions in relation to the current paper. An R package, msgl, with a relatively simple interface to our multinomial and logistic sparse group lasso regression routines. In addition, a C++ template library, sgl, is provided. The sgl template library gives access to the generic sparse group lasso routines. The R package relies on this library. The sgl template library relies on several external libraries. We use the Armadillo C++ library \cite{14} as our primary linear algebra engine. Armadillo is a C++ template library using expression template techniques to optimize the performance of matrix expressions. Furthermore we utilize several Boost libraries \cite{15}. Boost is a collection of free peer-reviewed C++ libraries, many of which are template libraries. For an introduction to these libraries see for example \cite{16}. Use of multiple processors for cross validation and subsampling is supported through OpenMP \cite{17}.

The msgl R package is available from CRAN. The sgl library is available upon request.

\subsection{Run-time performance}

Table \ref{tab:table_3} lists run-times of the current multinomial sparse group lasso implementation for three real data examples. For comparison, the glmnet uses 5.2s, 8.3s and 137.0s, respectively, to fit the lasso path for the three data sets in Table \ref{tab:table_3}. The glmnet is a fast implementation of the coordinate descent algorithm for fitting generalized linear models with the lasso penalty or the elastic net penalty \cite{10}. The glmnet cannot be used to fit models with group lasso or sparse group lasso penalty.

\section{Conclusion}

We developed an algorithm for solving the sparse group lasso optimization problem with a general convex loss function. Furthermore, convergence
\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{l l r r r r r r}
SL. NO. & AIRPORT & MAR 2023 & MAR 2022 & \% Change & 2022--23 & 2021--22 & \% Change \\
चF46 & BHUJ & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF47 & PANTNAGAR & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF48 & BHUNTAR & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF49 & BIKANER & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF50 & PORBANDAR & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF51 & CUDDAPAH & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF52 & PATHANKOT & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF53 & JALGAON & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF54 & TEZU & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF55 & TEZPUR & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF56 & HYDERABAD (BEGUMPET) & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF57 & SALEM & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF58 & ADAMPUR (JALANDHAR) & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF59 & SHIMLA & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF60 & KHAJURAHO & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF61 & PONDICHERRY & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF62 & LUDHIANA & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF63 & BHATINDA & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF64 & KOTA & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF65 & SHOLAPUR & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF66 & SAFDARJUNG & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF67 & COOCHBEHAR & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF68 & KESHOD (JUNAGARH) & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF69 & GONDIA & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF70 & KANPUR (CIVIL) & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
चF71 & HOLLONGI (DONYI POLO) & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
\textbf{TOTAL (F) 71 DOMESTIC AIRPORTS} &  & 2,338 & 2,640 & -11.4 & 32,549 & 27,659 & 17.7 \\
छG1 & DURGAPUR & 6 & 10 & -40.0 & 483 & 17 & - \\
छG2 & LENGPUI (AIZWAL) & 40 & 25 & 60.0 & 471 & 319 & 47.6 \\
छG3 & NASIK (HAL OZAR) & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 1 & - \\
छG4 & JAGDALPUR & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
छG5 & KURNOOL & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
छG6 & BILASPUR & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
छG7 & NANDED & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
छG8 & SINDHUDURG & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
छG9 & VIJAYANAGAR & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
छG10 & PASIGHAT & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
छG11 & BIDAR & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
छG12 & BANGALORE (HAL) & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
छG13 & PITHORAGARH & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
छG14 & MUNDRA & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
छG15 & HISAR & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
छG16 & JAMSHEDPUR & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
छG17 & ROURKELA & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
छG18 & JEYPORE & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
छG19 & ZIRO & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
\textbf{TOTAL (G) 19 ST GOVT./ PVT AIRPORTS} &  & 46 & 35 & 31.4 & 954 & 337 & - \\
\textbf{TOTAL (H) OTHER AIRPORTS} &  & 0 & 0 & - & 0 & 0 & - \\
\textbf{GRAND TOTAL (A+B+C+D+E+F+G+H)} &  & 1,12,444 & 1,08,879 & 3.3 & 12,94,045 & 11,79,690 & 9.7 \\
\end{tabular}
\label{table_1}
\end{table}
\title{Clinical Uses of Cervical Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Pediatric Patients}
\author{Guangwei Zhou \and Jenna Dargie \and Briana Dornan \and Kenneth Whittemore}

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters.

Citation: Zhou, Guangwei, Jenna Dargie, Briana Dornan, and Kenneth Whittemore. 2014. ``Clinical Uses of Cervical Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Pediatric Patients.'' \textit{Medicine} 93 (4): e37. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000000037.

Published Version: doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000000037.

Citable link: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:23474037

Terms of Use: This article was downloaded from Harvard University's DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use\#LAA.
\subsection{4.6.4 Learners’ computer literacy and utilisation of online electronic books}

The study also explored the influence of learners’ computer literacy on utilisation of online electronic books. In order to accomplish this task, respondents were asked to indicate the extent to which learners’ computer literacy influenced utilisation of online electronic books. The results are summarised in Table~\ref{table_4_31}.

\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\caption{Learners’ computer literacy and utilisation of online electronic books}
\label{table_4_31}
\begin{tabular}{lccc}
\hline
As a result of computer literacy able to use online electronic books & Frequency (f) & Percentage \% & Cumulative percent \\
\hline
Not at all & 61 & 23.6 & 23.6 \\
Less extent & 79 & 30.4 & 50.0 \\
Not sure & 55 & 21.1 & 75.2 \\
Great extent & 22 & 10.6 & 85.7 \\
Very great extent & 37 & 14.3 & 100.0 \\
\hline
Total & 259 & 100.0 &  \\
Mean & 2.61 &  &  \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}

On the basis of data shown in Table~\ref{table_4_31}, it emerges that 61 (23.6\%) and 79 (30.4\%) respondents scored in the Not at all and less extent level respectively. The information in Table~\ref{table_4_31} also reveal that 22 (10.6\%) and 37 (14.3\%) respondents scored in the great extent and very great extent, respectively while 55(21.1\%) said they were not sure. The data gives the impression that majority 140 (54\%) respondents did not support the view that learners’ computer literacy influence utilisation of online electronic books compared to only, 59 (24.9\%) respondents supporting the opinion. The implication of this finding is that there was less influence of learners’ computer literacy on utilisation of online electronic books among the distance learning standards at the University of Nairobi.
\section{Service Importance \& Satisfaction: Community Programs}

\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\caption{Service Satisfaction Ratings for Community Programs}
\label{table_1}
\begin{tabular}{|l|l|c|c|}
\hline
Question -- Satisfaction on scale of 10 & Response & Resident Sample & Business Sample \\
\hline
Planning for and managing residential, commercial and industrial development & Rating of 8, 9 or 10 & 13\% & 11\% \\
 & Average rating & 6.4 & 5.7 \\
 & Don't know responses & 11\% & 6\% \\
\hline
Environmental protection, support for green projects (e.g. green grants, building retrofits programs, zero waste) & Rating of 8, 9 or 10 & 35\% & 34\% \\
 & Average rating & 8.0 & 7.5 \\
 & Don't know responses & 8\% & 6\% \\
\hline
Providing and maintaining parks and green spaces & Rating of 8, 9 or 10 & 42\% & 41\% \\
 & Average rating & 7.7 & 7.3 \\
 & Don't know responses & 1\% & 1\% \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}

Base: Resident respondents (n=1,315) and Business respondents (n=397).

How important do you believe the following services/programs are to the larger community? Below is a list of specific services that the City of Vancouver provides its residents/businesses. Please rate the job you think the City of Vancouver is doing in providing each type of service.

Budget 2015 Service Satisfaction Survey (January 2015).
\begin{table}[htbp]
\centering
\caption{Juvenile Offenders in Detention as at 28/07/2011 00:00 Hours. Count by Facility, Status, Ethnicity and Gender}
\label{table_1}
\begin{tabular}{lccccccccccccc}
\hline
 & \multicolumn{6}{c}{Sentenced} & \multicolumn{6}{c}{Unsentenced} & Total \\
\cline{2-13}
Facility & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Aboriginal} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Non-Aboriginal} & Total & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Aboriginal} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Non-Aboriginal} &  \\
 & Male & Female & Total & Male & Total &  & Male & Female & Total & Male & Female & Total &  \\
\hline
BANKSIA HILL DETENTION CENTRE & 59 & 0 & 59 & 28 & 28 & 87 & 15 & 0 & 15 & 12 & 0 & 12 & 114 \\
RANGEVIEW REMAND CENTRE & 5 & 2 & 7 & 2 & 2 & 9 & 29 & 7 & 36 & 12 & 3 & 15 & 60 \\
Total & 64 & 2 & 66 & 30 & 30 & 96 & 44 & 7 & 51 & 24 & 3 & 27 & 174 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\title{South London Freight Quality Partnership Steering Group Meeting Minutes \\ Monday 3rd September 2007}

\section{Attendees}

Mick Heduan -- Transport for London

Edward Noble -- LB Merton

David Kennett -- LB Wandsworth

Roseline Holt -- Sainsburys

Richard Kingsbury -- LB Sutton

Stewart Saunders -- LB Croydon

Paul Croxon -- LB Croydon

Con O’Brien -- South London Business

Clive Barker -- CSB Logistics

Clive Simmonds -- LB Croydon

Dick Allard -- London Forum

Clive Woodhead -- P F Whiteheads

Alan Lucking -- SELTRANS

Iain Forbes -- LB Bromley

Alan Lewis -- TTR

Arnaud Lagrange -- TTR

Russ Tricker -- TTR

\section{Apologies}

Gordon Telling -- Freight Transport Association

Natalie Chapman -- Freight Transport Association

Marc Dubet -- LB Merton

Alan Carroll -- LB Sutton

Stephen Potter -- LB Croydon

\section{Introduction}

The meeting was designed to update the steering group on the progress made since the last meeting and to discuss new streams of work for the future of the FQP.

\section{Legal Loading Initiative Implementation}

RT quickly reviewed the main aim of the Legal Loading Initiative work, informing the group that the six site reports have now been finished in consultation with the key stakeholders in each of the areas which helped us to understand where the problems exist with respect to loading and unloading. The reports include a list of recommendations for each site to assist (un)loading conditions and these have been proposed to the Boroughs involved. Since then plans have been made to try and obtain likely costings and timescales for the recommended work to be completed.
\section{MERCADO DE TRABALHO}

\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
 & 1998 & 1999 & 2000 & 2001 & 2002 \\
\hline
Taxa de actividade económica (15--64 anos) & 62,8 & 60,2 & 62,2 & 62,2 & 62,9 \\
Taxa de emprego (15--64 anos) total & 55,3 & 53,2 & 51,3 & 51,8 & 53,6 \\
Taxa de emprego (15--64 anos), homens & 61,7 & 60,2 & 57,4 & 59,0 & 60,1 \\
Taxa de emprego (15--64 anos), mulheres & 49,4 & 47,7 & 45,5 & 44,9 & 47,4 \\
\hline
\multicolumn{6}{l}{Emprego médio por classes da NACE (\% do total)} \\
Agricultura e silvicultura & 16,5 & 16,7 & 11,7 & 15,5 & 14,9 \\
Indústria (excluindo construção) & 23,5 & 23,9 & 22,7 & 23,1 & 23,0 \\
Construção & 6,7 & 6,6 & 5,9 & 6,3 & 6,6 \\
Serviços & 53,3 & 52,9 & 59,4 & 55,0 & 55,4 \\
\hline
\multicolumn{6}{l}{Taxa de desemprego (\% da população activa)} \\
Taxa de desemprego total & 11,6 & 14,5 & 17,0 & 16,3 & 14,4 \\
Taxa de desemprego, homens & 10,7 & 13,5 & 15,9 & 14,4 & 13,3 \\
Taxa de desemprego, mulheres & 12,6 & 15,7 & 18,2 & 18,7 & 15,8 \\
Taxa de desemprego de pessoas com < 25 anos & 31,0 & 39,2 & 43,1 & 41,7 & 34,4 \\
\hline
\multicolumn{6}{l}{Taxa de desemprego de longa duração (\% de todos os desempregados)} \\
 & 46,0 & 50,2 & 53,6 & 55,3 & 53,1 \\
\end{tabular}
\caption{}
\label{table_1}
\end{table}

\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{lccc}
Taxa de desemprego por região NUTS III & \multicolumn{3}{c}{\% da população activa} \\
\hline
Região administrativa de Zagreb & 20,0 & 23,0 & 24,4 \\
Região administrativa de Krapina-Zagorje & 17,1 & 19,4 & 20,5 \\
Região administrativa de Sisak-Moslavina & 27,4 & 32,2 & 35,0 \\
Região administrativa de Karlovac & 31,1 & 33,1 & 32,9 \\
Região administrativa de Varaždin & 17,6 & 17,8 & 18,2 \\
Região administrativa de Koprivnica-Križevci & 16,9 & 18,4 & 21,0 \\
Região administrativa de Bjelovar-Bilogora & 27,2 & 28,9 & 31,3 \\
Região administrativa de Primorje-Gorski kotar & 18,9 & 19,8 & 18,9 \\
Região administrativa de Lika-Senj & 25,5 & 27,9 & 30,9 \\
Região administrativa de Virovitica-Podravina & 26,2 & 28,7 & 32,9 \\
Região administrativa de Požega-Slavonia & 26,0 & 27,9 & 29,5 \\
Região administrativa de Slavonski Brod-Posavina & 33,7 & 34,5 & 36,3 \\
Região administrativa de Zadar & 31,4 & 32,2 & 33,0 \\
Região administrativa de Osijek-Baranja & 28,7 & 30,8 & 32,4 \\
Região administrativa de Šibenik-Knin & 36,4 & 38,8 & 39,6 \\
Região administrativa de Vukovar-Sirmium & 37,7 & 40,1 & 40,8 \\
Região administrativa de Split-Dalmatia & 29,1 & 30,1 & 30,8 \\
Região administrativa de Istria & 15,2 & 14,9 & 14,9 \\
Região administrativa de Dubrovnik-Neretva & 24,4 & 24,9 & 26,3 \\
Região administrativa de Međimurje & 19,3 & 19,1 & 19,8 \\
Cidade de Zagreb & 11,6 & 13,3 & 13,9 \\
\end{tabular}
\caption{}
\label{table_2}
\end{table}

Taxa de desemprego ao nível de região administrativa (NUTS III) em 31 de Março, segundo fontes administrativas, pelo que os dados não são comparáveis com a taxa de desemprego calculada a partir do IFT. Os dados calculados ao nível das regiões administrativas excluem as pessoas empregadas na política e na defesa.
\title{Isotope Geochemistry}
\author{William M. White}

\section{Description}
This book provides a comprehensive introduction to radiogenic and stable isotope geochemistry. Beginning with a brief overview of nuclear physics and nuclear origins, it then reviews radioactive decay schemes and their use in geochronology. A following chapter covers the closely related techniques such as fission-track and carbon-14 dating. Subsequent chapters cover nucleosynthetic anomalies in meteorites and early solar system chronology and the use of radiogenic isotopes in understanding the evolution of the Earth’s mantle, crust, and oceans. Attention then turns to stable isotopes and after reviewing the basic principles involved, the book explores their use in topics as diverse as mantle evolution, archeology and paleontology, ore formation, and, particularly, paleoclimatology. A following chapter explores recent developments including unconventional stable isotopes, mass-independent fractionation, and isotopic ‘clumping’. The final chapter reviews the isotopic variation in the noble gases, which result from both radioactive decay and chemical fractionations.

\section{About the Author}
William White teaches geochemistry as a Professor of earth and atmospheric sciences at Cornell University. He received a B.A. in geology from the University of California, Berkeley and a PhD in oceanography from the University of Rhode Island. He is a Fellow of the Geochemical Society/European Association of Geochemistry and the AGU and has been named a highly cited author by ISI. He is the author of \textit{Geochemistry}, also published by Wiley-Blackwell.
\section{Other Fees}
Where students are not paying a consolidated programme fee as prescribed in section 1, fees shall be payable as follows:

\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{l l}
Registration: Go Higher (means tested benefits) & 50 \\
Registration: Submission Pending & 200 (50 per quarter) \\
Examination: Higher Doctorate & 710 \\
Re-examination: MD & 485 \\
Re-examination: PhD & 485 \\
Re-examination: MPhil & 390 \\
Re-examination: Dissertation & 185 \\
Re-examination in session: taught programmes & Nil \\
Repeat study: with attendance & Pro rata to full-time programme fee \\
Repeat study: with partial remote supervision & 1/3 of module credit value \\
Repeat study: without attendance & 175
\end{tabular}
\label{table_1}
\end{table}

\section{Research Support Fees}
Fees payable for consumables for students on MPhil and PhD programmes will be specified within individual applicants’ offer letters. Research support fees shall be payable for specified programmes as follows:

\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{l l}
Doctor of Dental Science (Orthodontics) & 3,854 (14,099 for overseas students) \\
Doctor of Dental Science (Endodontics) & 13,556 (20,940 for overseas students) \\
Doctor of Dental Science (Special Care Dentistry) & 3,244 (14,099 for overseas students) \\
MRes Biomedical Sciences and Translational Medicine & 3,000 \\
MRes Clinical Science & 3,000 \\
Dip Bovine Reproduction & 1,195
\end{tabular}
\label{table_2}
\end{table}
\section{3. European Union law (10)}

\begin{itemize}
\item Regulation 45/2001
\begin{itemize}
\item Applies Directive 95/46/EC specifically to EU \& EU institutions $\Rightarrow$ possible role EU in GMES ...?
\end{itemize}

\item Directives 97/66 \& 2002/58
\begin{itemize}
\item Deals with privacy issues specifically in context of telecom services $\Rightarrow$ role publicly available / accessible telecom infrastructure
\end{itemize}

\item Decisions 2001/497 \& 2002/16
\begin{itemize}
\item Deals with extra-EU application (...)
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}