cheaptrix/billsum-US_congress_and_house huggingface dataset:
Paycheck Protection for Producers Act

To modify the calculation of the maximum loan amount for certain farmers and ranchers under the paycheck protection program of the Small Business Administration, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Paycheck Protection for Producers Act 2. Calculation of maximum loan amount for farmers and ranchers under the paycheck protection program (a) In general Section 7(a)(36) of the Small Business Act ( 15 U.S.C. 636(a)(36) (1) in subparagraph (E), in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking During Except as provided in subparagraph (T), during (2) by adding at the end the following: (T) Calculation of maximum loan amount for farmers and ranchers (i) Definition In this subparagraph, the term covered recipient (I) operates as a sole proprietorship or as an independent contractor, or is an eligible self-employed individual; (II) reports farm income or expenses on a Schedule F (or any equivalent successor schedule); and (III) was in business during the period beginning on February 15, 2019, and ending on June 30, 2019. (ii) No employees With respect to covered recipient without employees, the maximum covered loan amount shall be the lesser of— (I) the sum of— (aa) the product obtained by multiplying— (AA) the gross income of the covered recipient in 2019, as reported on a Schedule F (or any equivalent successor schedule), that is not more than $100,000, divided by 12; and (BB) 2.5; and (bb) the outstanding amount of a loan under subsection (b)(2) that was made during the period beginning on January 31, 2020, and ending on April 3, 2020, that the borrower intends to refinance under the covered loan, not including any amount of any advance under the loan that is not required to be repaid; or (II) $10,000,000. (iii) With employees With respect to a covered recipient with employees, the maximum covered loan amount shall be calculated using the formula described in subparagraph (E), except that the gross income of the covered recipient described in clause (ii)(I)(aa)(AA) of this subparagraph, as divided by 12, shall be added to the sum calculated under subparagraph (E)(i)(I). (iv) Recalculation A lender that made a covered loan to a covered recipient before the date of enactment of this subparagraph may, at the request of the covered recipient— (I) recalculate the maximum loan amount applicable to that covered loan based on the formula described in clause (ii) or (iii), as applicable, if doing so would result in a larger covered loan amount; and (II) provide the covered recipient with additional covered loan amounts based on that recalculation. .

Summary: Paycheck Protection for Producers Act This bill modifies the Paycheck Protection Program, established to support small businesses in response to COVID-19 (i.e., coronavirus disease 2019), by allowing certain farmers to calculate (or recalculate) their paycheck protection loan amount based on 2019 gross income. Under current law, such farmers must calculate their paycheck protection loan amount based on net income.
A bill to clarify that funding for the standard setting body designated pursuant to section 19(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 is not subject to the sequester.

To clarify that funding for the standard setting body designated pursuant to section 19(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 is not subject to the sequester. 1. Clarification Section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 ( 2 U.S.C. 901a 15 U.S.C. 77s(b)

Summary: This bill provides that any sequestration ordered by the President is inapplicable to funding of the body that sets standards for generally accepted accounting principles for purposes of securities laws. (Sequestration is a process of automatic, usually across-the-board spending reductions under which budgetary resources are permanently cancelled to enforce specific budget policy goals.)
A bill to establish a 90-day limit to file a petition for judicial review of a permit, license, or approval for a highway or public transportation project, and for other purposes.

To establish a 90-day limit to file a petition for judicial review of a permit, license, or approval for a highway or public transportation project, and for other purposes. 1. Limitations on claims (a) In general Section 139(l) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by striking 150 days 90 days (b) Conforming amendments (1) Section 330(e) of title 23, United States Code, is amended— (A) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking 150 days 90 days (B) in paragraph (3)(B)(i), by striking 150 days 90 days (2) Section 24201(a)(4) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking of 150 days

Summary: This bill modifies the time limit from 150 days to 90 days to file a petition for judicial review of a permit, license, or approval for a highway or public transportation capital project.
Supreme Court Ethics Act

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for a code of conduct for justices and judges of the courts of the United States. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Supreme Court Ethics Act 2. Code of conduct (a) In general Chapter 57 964. Code of conduct Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this section, the Judicial Conference of the United States shall issue a code of conduct, which applies to each justice and judge of the courts of the United States, except that the code of conduct may include provisions that are applicable only to certain categories of judges or justices. . (b) Technical and conforming amendment The table of sections for chapter 57 964. Code of conduct. .

Summary: Supreme Court Ethics Act This bill establishes a new statutory requirement for the Judicial Conference of the United States (Judicial Conference) to issue a judicial code of conduct for judges and justices of U.S. courts (including Justices of the Supreme Court). Currently, the Judicial Conference issues a code of conduct for judges of U.S. courts (but not for Justices of the Supreme Court).
A bill to amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit the burial in Arlington National Cemetery, Virginia, of any President or Vice President who is not a member or veteran of the Armed Forces.

To amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit the burial in Arlington National Cemetery, Virginia, of any President or Vice President who is not a member or veteran of the Armed Forces. 1. Prohibition on burial in Arlington National Cemetery, Virginia, of any President or Vice President who is not a member or veteran of the Armed Forces Section 7722(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) (A) In carrying out paragraphs (1) and (2), the Secretary of Defense shall not approve a determination of eligibility for interment or inurnment in Arlington National Cemetery made by the Secretary of the Army that permits the interment or inurnment in Arlington National Cemetery of an individual who is not a member of the armed forces or a veteran (as that term is defined in section 101(2) of title 38), but served as President of the United States or Vice President of the United States. (B) For purposes of subparagraph (A), a President shall not be considered a member of the armed forces or a veteran by virtue of service under the Constitution as the Commander-in-Chief, and a Vice President shall not be considered a member of the armed forces or a veteran by virtue of service under the Constitution as Vice President. .

Summary: This bill prohibits the Department of Defense from approving a determination of eligibility for interment or inurnment in Arlington National Cemetery made by the Department of the Army that permits the interment or inurnment in Arlington National Cemetery of an individual who is not a member of the Armed Forces or a veteran, but served as President or Vice President of the United States.
Special Diabetes Programs for Indians Reauthorization Act of 2020

To amend section 330C of the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize special programs for Indians for providing services for the prevention and treatment of diabetes, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Special Diabetes Programs for Indians Reauthorization Act of 2020 2. Reauthorization of special diabetes programs for Indians for diabetes services (a) Funding Section 330C(c)(2)(D) of the Public Health Service Act ( 42 U.S.C. 254c–3(c)(2)(D) $25,068,493 for the period beginning on October 1, 2020, and ending on November 30, 2020 $200,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2025 (b) Delivery of funds Section 330C(b) of the Public Health Service Act ( 42 U.S.C. 254c–3(b) (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (3) as subparagraphs (A) through (C), respectively, and indenting appropriately; (2) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) (as so redesignated), by striking For purposes of (1) Eligible entities For purposes of ; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (2) Delivery of funds On request from an Indian tribe or tribal organization, the Secretary shall award a grant under this section pursuant to a contract, cooperative agreement, or compact under, as applicable, title I or V of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act. .

Summary: Special Diabetes Programs for Indians Reauthorization Act of 2020 This bill reauthorizes through FY2025 the Special Diabetes Program for Indians, which is administered by the Indian Health Service. It also allows tribal grantees to receive program funds through self-governance contracts, cooperative agreements, or compacts.
Hand Sanitizer Guidance Extension Act of 2020

To extend Federal guidance concerning the use of certain alcohol-based hand sanitizer during the coronavirus public health emergency, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Hand Sanitizer Guidance Extension Act of 2020 2. Federal guidance on hand sanitizer (a) Extension of Federal guidance The Food and Drug Administration guidance entitled Guidance for Industry: Temporary Policy for Preparation of Certain Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer Products During the Public Health Emergency (COVID–19) (b) Effect of extension During the 2-year period described in subsection (a), the Food and Drug Administration shall permit the production, sale, and use of hand sanitizer, consistent with the guidance described in subsection (a), provided that such hand sanitizer is manufactured using only the following ingredients in the preparation of the product: (1) (A) Subject to subsection (c), alcohol (ethanol) that is not less than 94.9 percent ethanol by volume; or (B) United States Pharmacopeia grade isopropyl alcohol. (2) United States Pharmacopeia grade or Food Chemical Codex grade glycerin (glycerol). (3) Hydrogen peroxide. (4) Sterile water meeting United States Pharmacopeia specifications for purified water. (c) Ethanol produced in certain facilities Ethanol produced in facilities normally producing fuel or technical ethanol may be used as described in subsection (b)(1)(A) only if such ethanol— (1) meets United States Pharmacopeia or Food Chemical Codex grade requirements; (2) has been screened for any other potentially harmful impurities not specified in the United States Pharmacopeia or Food Chemical Codex requirements; or (3) has otherwise been approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration. (d) Automatic extension The effective period of the guidance described in subsection (a) shall automatically be extended for 1 additional year if the Secretary of Health and Human Services determines that a public health emergency exists at the time that the 2-year period described in subsection (a) expires. (e) Exemption If the Commissioner of Food and Drugs determines that a public health emergency requires that the requirement for the use of denatured alcohol be reduced, or requires a waiver of any other requirement with respect to hand sanitizer under the guidance, the Commissioner of Food and Drugs may waive or reduce such requirement, as applicable.

Summary: Hand Sanitizer Guidance Extension Act of 2020 This bill specifies that certain Food and Drug Administration guidance related to the manufacture of alcohol-based hand sanitizers during the COVID-19 (i.e., coronavirus disease 2019) public health emergency shall remain in effect for two years after this bill's enactment. The bill also imposes various requirements related to the content of hand sanitizers manufactured while the guidance is in effect.
Territorial Economic Recovery Act

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude certain amounts from the tested income of controlled foreign corporations, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Territorial Economic Recovery Act 2. Income of certain qualified possession corporations excluded from tested income (a) In general Section 951A (1) in subsection (c)(2)(A)(i), by striking and over and (VI) any income of a qualified possession corporation that is effectively connected with the active conduct of a trade or business within a possession of the United States, over ; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsections: (g) Possession of the United States For purposes of this section, the term possession of the United States (h) Qualified possession corporation For purposes of this section, the term qualified possession corporation (1) 80 percent or more of the gross income of such corporation was derived from sources within a possession of the United States, and (2) 75 percent or more of the gross income of such corporation was effectively connected with the active conduct of a trade or business within a possession of the United States. . (b) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall apply taxable years of foreign corporations beginning after December 31, 2019, and to taxable years of United States shareholders in which or with which such taxable years of foreign corporations end.

Summary: Territorial Economic Recovery Act This bill restores the favorable tax treatment of investment in U.S. territories and possessions. It treats such investment as domestic rather than foreign investment and requires investors to have an active trade or business in a U.S. territory or possession with a certain percentage of income derived from such territory or possession.
Coronavirus Relief Flexibility for Students and Institutions Act

To amend the provisions relating to the higher education emergency relief fund to clarify the flexibility provided to institutions and for students under the fund, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Coronavirus Relief Flexibility for Students and Institutions Act 2. Higher education relief fund Section 18004 of division B of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act ( Public Law 116–136 (1) in subsection (a)(3), by striking determines have the determines, through an application process, demonstrate the (2) in subsection (c)— (A) by striking cover any costs associated with significant changes to the delivery of instruction due to the coronavirus defray expenses (including lost revenue, reimbursement for expenses already incurred, technology costs associated with a transition to distance education, faculty and staff training, and payroll) (B) by striking Institutions Notwithstanding any provision of the Higher Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 1001 (C) by inserting , with the eligibility and selection of the students receiving such grants being determined solely by each such institution (3) in subsection (d)(1)— (A) by inserting determining grant recipients and In (B) by inserting , by application under such section 18004(a)(3), demonstrates

Summary: Coronavirus Relief Flexibility for Students and Institutions Act This bill allows additional uses for higher education emergency relief funds and requires institutions of higher education (IHEs) to apply for such funds. Specifically, the bill permits IHEs to use emergency relief funds to defray expenses, including those related to lost revenue, incurred expenses, technology costs for distance education, faculty and staff training, and payroll. Currently, the use of such funds is limited to the delivery of instruction due to the coronavirus (i.e., the virus that causes COVID-19). Further, IHEs must apply to the Department of Education to receive such funds.
A bill to amend the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on Native Children Act to extend the deadline for a report by the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on Native Children, and for other purposes.

To amend the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on Native Children Act to extend the deadline for a report by the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on Native Children, and for other purposes. 1. Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on Native Children report Section 3(f) of the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on Native Children Act ( Public Law 114–244 3 years 5 years September 24, 2020 Reported without amendment

Summary: This bill extends the deadline, from three years to five years, for the Alyce Spotted Bear and Walter Soboleff Commission on Native Children to submit its report to the President and Congress. The commission was established to conduct a comprehensive study of federal, state, local, and tribal programs that serve Native children and to develop plans for federal policy related to Native children.
Providing Accountability Through Transparency Act of 2019

To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, to include a link to a 100 word plain language summary of the proposed rule. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Providing Accountability Through Transparency Act of 2019 2. Requirement to post a 100 word summary to regulations.gov Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (2) , and (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following: (4) the Internet address of a summary of not more than 100 words in length of the proposed rule, in plain language, that shall be posted on the Internet website under section 206(d) of the E-Government Act of 2002 ( 44 U.S.C. 3501 . March 25, 2019 Reported without amendment

Summary: Providing Accountability Through Transparency Act of 2019 This bill requires the notice of a proposed rule by a federal agency to include the Internet address of a summary of the rule. The summary must be 100 words or fewer, written in plain language, and posted on regulations.gov.
Justice for Breonna Taylor Act

To prohibit no-knock warrants, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Justice for Breonna Taylor Act 2. Prohibition on no-knock warrants (a) Federal prohibition Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a Federal law enforcement officer (as defined in section 115 of title 18, United States Code) may not execute a warrant until after the officer provides notice of his or her authority and purpose. (b) State and local law enforcement agencies Beginning in the first fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of this Act, and each fiscal year thereafter, a State or local law enforcement agency that receive funds from the Department of Justice during the fiscal year may not execute a warrant that does not require the law enforcement officer serving the warrant to provide notice of his or her authority and purpose before forcibly entering a premises.

Summary: Justice for Breonna Taylor Act This bill prohibits no-knock warrants, which generally permit law enforcement officers to enter a premises without first identifying their authority and purpose. Specifically, it requires federal law enforcement officers to provide notice of their authority and purpose before executing a warrant. State and local law enforcement agencies that receive funds from the Department of Justice must execute warrants that require the serving officer to provide notice of his or her authority and purpose before forcibly entering a premises.
End Police Use of Chokeholds Act of 2020

To incentivize banning of chokeholds and carotid holds, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the End Police Use of Chokeholds Act of 2020 2. Incentivizing banning of chokeholds and carotid holds (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Byrne grant program The term Byrne grant program 34 U.S.C. 10151 (2) Chokehold or carotid hold The term chokehold or carotid hold (3) COPS grant program The term COPS grant program 34 U.S.C. 10381 (b) Limitation on eligibility for funds Beginning in the first fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of this Act, a State or local jurisdiction may not receive funds under the Byrne grant program or the COPS grant program for a fiscal year if, on the day before the first day of the fiscal year, the State or other jurisdiction does not have in effect a law that prohibits law enforcement officers in the State or other jurisdiction from using a chokehold or carotid hold.

Summary: End Police Use of Chokeholds Act of 2020 This bill creates a new condition of eligibility for funds under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) program and the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) program. Specifically, to be eligible for grant funds under the COPS program and JAG program, a state or locality must have in effect a law that prohibits law enforcement officers from using a chokehold or carotid hold.