To require the Director of the National Science Foundation to establish a grant program to make grants to eligible entities to develop instructional content on artificial intelligence, and for other purposes.

To require the Director of the National Science Foundation to establish a grant program to make grants to eligible entities to develop instructional content on artificial intelligence, and for other purposes. 1. Grant program for artificial intelligence instructional content (a) In general Beginning not later than January 1, 2022, the Director shall award grants on a competitive basis to eligible entities to research the development of instructional content for teachers of a public elementary school or secondary school in accordance with subsection (e). (b) Applications (1) In general To be eligible to receive a grant under subsection (a), an eligible entity shall submit to the Director an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require, which shall include— (A) an explanation detailing how the proposed research and development of instructional content by such eligible entity would complement and enrich a curriculum approved by a State educational agency for implementation in a public elementary school or secondary school; and (B) a plan to— (i) develop or adapt instructional content in accordance with subsection (e); (ii) pilot such instructional content in a public elementary school or secondary school; or (iii) assess the comprehension of students after the instruction of such pilot instructional content to determine the efficacy of such instructional content. (2) Conditions for receiving a grant As a condition of receiving a grant under this section, an eligible entity shall agree to— (A) report to the Director, at such time and in such manner as the Director may require, on— (i) the activities carried out and materials developed using funds from such grant; and (ii) input received from any teacher of an elementary school or secondary school that has successfully used the instructional content within the curriculum of such school; (B) ensure that all instructional content created as a result of such grant are freely available to the public; and (C) comply with the requirements of section 3474.20 of title 2, Federal Code of Regulations. (c) Review board (1) Establishment The Director shall establish, and appoint individuals to, a review board to select the grant recipients in accordance with— (A) the standard metrics in the most recent version of the National Science Foundation Proposal and Award Policies Guide; and (B) the metrics outlined in subsection (d). (2) Composition The review board shall be equally comprised of the following: (A) Faculty members at institutions of higher education with expertise in artificial intelligence. (B) Faculty members at institutions of higher education with expertise in education. (C) Teachers at institutions of higher education. (D) Teachers at elementary schools or secondary schools, including elementary schools or secondary schools receiving funds under part A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 6311 (E) Professionals who, as determined by the Director, spend the majority of their workday interacting with artificial intelligence tools in the workplace. (d) Additional selection metrics The Director shall develop metrics, for the review board to measure the likely success of an application, that assess— (1) the ability for the instructional content derived from the research grants to be widely distributed, and easily accessible, to public elementary schools and secondary schools; (2) the ability for the instructional content derived from the research grants to reach a diverse student body; and (3) the ability for the instructional content derived from the research grants to address the unique needs of a school receiving Federal funds under Title 1 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 6301 (e) Instructional content (1) In general An eligible entity conducting research under subsection (a) shall devise a comprehensive and structured series of exercises— (A) appropriate to each grade level; and (B) designed to— (i) convey the principles behind, mechanics of, and societal implications or ethics of the use of artificial intelligence; and (ii) provide teaching instructions for teachers at elementary schools or secondary schools on such mechanisms when needed. (2) Teaching instructions In providing teaching instructions for teachers at elementary schools or secondary schools under paragraph (1), an eligible entity may include the following: (A) Prescribed worksheets. (B) Textbooks or other reading materials. (C) Educational games. (D) Digital instructional resources, including web-based applications, mobile applications, or application programming interfaces. (E) Virtual professional development programs for teachers at elementary schools or secondary schools, including webinars, online conferences, or massive open online courses. (F) Tools to improve the accessibility of instructional content to students with learning disabilities. (G) Tools to improve the accessibility of instructional content to students learning English as a second language. (H) Any other materials or activities that the Director determines to be necessary to accomplish the general goal outlined in paragraph (1)(B)(i). (3) Topics In conveying the mechanisms behind artificial intelligence and the societal implications of the use of artificial intelligence, an eligible entity may address the following topics: (A) How artificial intelligence systems work, including— (i) how artificial intelligence systems perceive and interact with their surrounding environments; (ii) how artificial intelligence systems derive patterns and relationships from data; and (iii) how artificial intelligence systems adapt based on the acquisition of new information. (B) The societal implications of the broad application of artificial intelligence systems, including— (i) investigating when and how bias may be intentionally or unintentionally created when using artificial intelligence; (ii) investigating the tradeoffs between privacy and security as it pertains to the use of artificial intelligence applications; and (iii) investigating the likely future impacts of artificial intelligence on society. (C) Any other topics determined necessary by the Director. (f) Evaluation (1) In general Not later than 4 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 3 years thereafter, the Director shall evaluate the grant program under this section. (2) Content In evaluating the grant program under subsection (a), the Director shall include— (A) a common set of benchmarks and assessment tools to identify best practices and materials developed and demonstrated by the grant recipients; and (B) recommendations for future expansion of such program. (3) Publication Not later than 30 days after the completion of the evaluation under paragraph (1), the results of such evaluation shall be made available on a publicly accessible website of the National Science Foundation. (g) Definitions In this section: (1) Artificial intelligence The term artificial intelligence (A) can, for a given set of human-defined objectives, make predictions, recommendations, or decisions that influence real or virtual environments; and (B) uses machine and human-based inputs to— (i) perceive real and virtual environments; (ii) abstract such perceptions into models through analysis in an automated manner; and (iii) use model inference to formulate options for information or action. (2) Director The term Director (3) Eligible entity The term eligible entity (A) a State research agency; (B) a Federal research agency; (C) an institution of higher education; (D) a junior or community college; (E) a nonprofit organization with a history of publishing peer-reviewed research in the fields of education, computer science, or related fields; or (F) any combination of subparagraphs (A) through (E). (4) Elementary school; secondary school The terms elementary school secondary school 20 U.S.C. 7801 (5) Institution of higher education The term institution of higher education 20 U.S.C. 1001 (6) Instructional content The term instructional content (7) Junior or community college The term junior or community college 20 U.S.C. 1058(f) (8) State educational agency The term State educational agency 2. Robert Noyce Teacher Training and Education Program Section 10(i)(5) of the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2002 ( 42 U.S.C. 1862n–1(i)(5) (5) the term mathematics and science teacher (A) a science, technology, engineering, mathematics, or computer science, including cybersecurity, teacher at the elementary school or secondary school level; or (B) a teacher at an elementary school or secondary school who instructs from a curriculum that incorporates, to a substantial degree, quantitative data analysis. .

Summary: This bill directs the National Science Foundation (NSF), beginning not later than January 1, 2022, to award grants on a competitive basis to eligible entities (e.g. a state research agency, a federal research agency, and an institution of higher education) to research the development of instructional content for teachers of a public elementary school or secondary school in accordance with a comprehensive and structured series of exercises (1) appropriate to each grade level; and (2) designed to convey the principles behind, mechanics of, and societal implications or ethics of the use of artificial intelligence; and (3) provide teaching instructions for teachers at elementary schools or secondary schools on such mechanisms when needed. The NSF shall establish, and appoint individuals to, a review board to select the grant recipients. The bill includes as a mathematics and science teacher, with respect to the Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program, a teacher at an elementary school or secondary school who instructs from a curriculum that incorporates, to a substantial degree, quantitative data analysis.