William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021

To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2021 for military activities of the Department of Defense and for military construction, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes. 1. Short title (a) Short title This Act may be cited as the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (b) References Any reference in this or any other Act to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents (a) Divisions This Act is organized into four divisions as follows: (1) Division A—Department of Defense Authorizations. (2) Division B—Military Construction Authorizations. (3) Division C—Department of Energy National Security Authorizations and Other Authorizations. (4) Division D—Funding Tables. (5) Division E—National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020. (b) Table of contents The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title. Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents. Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees. Division A—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS Title I—PROCUREMENT Subtitle A—Authorization Of Appropriations Sec. 101. Authorization of appropriations. Subtitle B—Navy Programs Sec. 111. Independent cost estimate of FFG(X) frigate program. Subtitle C—Air Force Programs Sec. 121. Modification of force structure objectives for B–1 bomber aircraft. Sec. 122. Extension of limitation on availability of funds for retirement of RC–135 aircraft. Sec. 123. Modification of limitation on availability of funds for retirement of E–8 JSTARS aircraft. Sec. 124. Limitation on availability of funds for the Advanced Battle Management System pending certification relating to RQ–4 aircraft. Sec. 125. Inventory requirements for certain air refueling tanker aircraft. Sec. 126. Limitation on production of KC–46A aircraft. Sec. 127. Assessment and certification relating to OC–135 aircraft. Sec. 128. Modernization plan for airborne intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. Sec. 129. Minimum bomber aircraft force level. Subtitle D—Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters Sec. 131. Documentation relating to the F–35 aircraft program. Sec. 132. Notification on software regression testing for F–35 aircraft. Sec. 133. Notification on efforts to replace inoperable ejection seat aircraft locator beacons. Sec. 134. Limitation on use of funds for the Armed Overwatch Program. Title II—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations. Subtitle B—Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations Sec. 211. Modification of Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation (SMART) Defense Education Program. Sec. 212. Enhanced participation of Department of Defense contractors in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics activities. Sec. 213. Modification of requirements relating to certain cooperative research and development agreements. Sec. 214. Pilot program on talent optimization. Sec. 215. Codification of the National Security Innovation Network. Sec. 216. Modification of pilot program on enhanced civics education. Sec. 217. Modification of joint artificial intelligence research, development, and transition activities. Sec. 218. Modification of national security innovation activities and manufacturing pilot program. Sec. 219. Extension of pilot program for the enhancement of the research, development, test, and evaluation centers of the Department of Defense. Sec. 220. Digital data management and analytics capability. Sec. 221. Social science, management science, and information science research activities. Sec. 222. Measuring and incentivizing programming proficiency. Sec. 223. Information technology modernization and security efforts. Sec. 224. Board of Directors for the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center. Sec. 225. Directed Energy Working Group. Sec. 226. Program Executive Officer for Autonomy. Sec. 227. Accountability measures relating to the Advanced Battle Management System. Sec. 228. Measures to address foreign talent programs. Sec. 229. Disclosure of foreign funding sources in applications for Federal research awards. Sec. 230. Limitations relating to large unmanned surface vessels and associated offensive weapon systems. Sec. 231. Limitation on availability of funds pending review and report on next generation air dominance capabilities. Subtitle C—Emerging Technology and Artificial Intelligence Matters Sec. 241. Steering committee on emerging technology. Sec. 242. Training for human resources personnel in artificial intelligence and related topics. Sec. 243. Unclassified workspaces for personnel with pending security clearances. Sec. 244. Pilot program on the use of electronic portfolios to evaluate applicants for certain technical positions. Sec. 245. Self-directed training in artificial intelligence. Sec. 246. Part-time and term employment of university professors and students in the Defense science and technology enterprise. Sec. 247. Microelectronics and national security. Sec. 248. Acquisition of ethically and responsibly developed artificial intelligence technology. Sec. 249. Enhancement of public-private talent exchange programs in the Department of Defense. Subtitle D—Sustainable Chemistry Research and Development Sec. 251. Short title. Sec. 252. Findings. Sec. 253. National coordinating entity for sustainable chemistry. Sec. 254. Strategic plan for sustainable chemistry. Sec. 255. Agency activities in support of sustainable chemistry. Sec. 256. Partnerships in sustainable chemistry. Sec. 257. Prioritization. Sec. 258. Rule of construction. Sec. 259. Major multi-user research facility project. Subtitle E—Plans, Reports, and Other Matters Sec. 261. Modification to annual report of the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation. Sec. 262. Repeal of quarterly updates on the Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle program. Sec. 263. Independent evaluation of personal protective and diagnostic testing equipment. Sec. 264. Reports on F–35 physiological episodes and mitigation efforts. Sec. 265. Study on mechanisms for attracting and retaining high quality talent in the national security innovation base. Title III—Operation and Maintenance Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 301. Authorization of appropriations. Subtitle B—Energy and Environment Sec. 311. Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Clearinghouse for review of mission obstructions. Sec. 312. Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Clearinghouse for review of mission obstructions. Sec. 313. Agreements to limit encroachments and other constraints on military training, testing, and operations. Sec. 314. Modification of Department of Defense environmental restoration authorities to include Federal Government facilities used by National Guard. Sec. 315. Increased transparency through reporting on usage and spills of aqueous film-forming foam at military installations. Sec. 316. Replacement of non-tactical motor vehicles at the end of service life with electric or hybrid motor vehicles. Sec. 317. Budgeting of Department of Defense relating to operational energy improvement. Sec. 318. Assessment of Department of Defense operational energy usage. Sec. 319. Improvement of the operational energy capability improvement fund of the Department of Defense. Sec. 320. Five-year reviews of containment technologies relating to Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility. Sec. 321. Limitation on use of funds for acquisition of furnished energy for Rhine Ordnance Barracks Army Medical Center. Sec. 322. Requirement to update Department of Defense climate change roadmap. Sec. 323. Comptroller General report on Department of Defense installation energy. Sec. 324. Department of Defense report on emissions levels. Sec. 325. Objectives, performance standards, and criteria for use of wildlife conservation banking programs. Sec. 326. Offshore wind energy development, Morro Bay, California. Sec. 327. Long-duration demonstration initiative and joint program. Sec. 328. Prizes for development of non-PFAS-containing fire-fighting agent. Sec. 329. Survey of technologies for Department of Defense application in phasing out the use of fluorinated aqueous film-forming foam. Sec. 330. Interagency body on research related to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. Sec. 331. Restriction on procurement by defense logistics agency of certain items containing perfluoroalkyl substances and polyfluoroalkyl substances. Sec. 332. Standards for removal or remedial actions with respect to PFOS or PFOA contamination. Sec. 333. Research and development of alternative to aqueous film-forming foam. Sec. 334. Notification to agricultural operations located in areas exposed to Department of Defense PFAS use. Sec. 335. Public disclosure of results of Department of Defense testing for perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances. Subtitle C—Logistics and Sustainment Sec. 351. National Defense Sustainment and Logistics Review. Sec. 352. Extension of sunset relating to charter air transportation services. Sec. 353. Additional elements for inclusion in Navy ship depot maintenance budget report. Sec. 354. Modification to limitation on length of overseas forward deployment of naval vessels. Sec. 355. Independent advisory panel on weapon system sustainment. Sec. 356. Biannual briefings on status of Shipyard Infrastructure Optimization Plan. Sec. 357. Materiel readiness metrics and objectives for major weapon systems. Subtitle D—Munitions Safety and Oversight Sec. 361. Chair of Department of Defense explosive safety board. Sec. 362. Explosive Ordnance Disposal Defense Program. Sec. 363. Assessment of resilience of Department of Defense munitions enterprise. Sec. 364. Report on safety waivers and mishaps in Department of Defense munitions enterprise. Subtitle E—Other Matters Sec. 371. Pilot program for temporary issuance of maternity-related uniform items. Sec. 372. Servicewomen’s Commemorative Partnerships. Sec. 373. Biodefense analysis and budget submission. Title IV—MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS Subtitle A—Active Forces Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces. Sec. 402. Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels. Sec. 403. Modification of the authorized number and accounting method for senior enlisted personnel. Subtitle B—Reserve Forces Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve. Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the Reserves. Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status). Sec. 414. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support. Subtitle C—Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 421. Military personnel. Title V—MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy Sec. 501. Authorized strength: exclusion of certain general and flag officers of the reserve components on active duty. Sec. 502. Diversity in selection boards. Sec. 503. Redaction of personally identifiable information from records furnished to a promotion board. Subtitle B—Reserve Component Management Sec. 511. Grants to support STEM education in the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps. Sec. 512. Modification of education loan repayment program for members of Selected Reserve. Sec. 513. Requirement of consent of the chief executive officer for certain full-time National Guard duty performed in a State, Territory, or the District of Columbia. Sec. 514. Constructive credit for certain members of the reserve components who cannot complete minimum annual training requirements as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Sec. 515. Guidance for use of unmanned aircraft systems by the National Guard. Sec. 516. Direct employment pilot program for certain members of the reserve components. Sec. 517. Temporary limitation on authority to transfer, relocate, or dissolve elements of the reserve components of the Air Force. Sec. 518. Pilot programs in connection with SROTC units and CSPI programs at Historically Black Colleges and Universities and minority institutions. Subtitle C—General Service Authorities and Correction of Military Records Sec. 521. Temporary authority to order retired members to active duty in high-demand, low-density assignments during war or national emergency. Sec. 522. Reenlistment waivers for persons separated from the Armed Forces who commit one misdemeanor cannabis offense. Sec. 523. Review of Seaman to Admiral-21 program; credit towards retirement. Subtitle D—Military Justice and Other Legal Matters Sec. 531. Punitive article on violent extremism. Sec. 532. Preservation of Court-martial records. Sec. 533. Electronic notarization for members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 534. Clarifications regarding scope of employment and reemployment rights of members of the uniformed services. Sec. 535. Absentee ballot tracking program. Sec. 536. Tracking mechanism and reporting requirements for supremacist, extremist, and criminal gang activity in the Armed Forces. Sec. 537. Military-civilian task force on domestic violence and related information collection activities. Sec. 538. Actions to address military-connected child abuse. Sec. 539. Multidisciplinary board to evaluate suicide events. Subtitle E—Sexual Assault Sec. 541. Protection of attorney-client privilege between victims and Special Victims’ Counsel. Sec. 542. Authority of military judges and military magistrates to issue military court protective orders. Sec. 543. Additional bases for provision of advice by the Defense Advisory Committee for the Prevention of Sexual Misconduct. Sec. 544. Modification of reporting and data collection on victims of sexual offenses. Sec. 545. Modification of annual report regarding sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 546. Coordination of support for survivors of sexual trauma. Sec. 547. Policy on separation of victim and accused at military service academies. Sec. 548. Safe-to-report policy applicable across the Armed Forces. Sec. 549. Question in workplace and gender relations surveys regarding prosecutions of sexual assault. Sec. 549A. Pilot program on prosecution of special victim offenses committed by attendees of military service academies. Sec. 549B. Report on status of investigations of alleged sex-related offenses. Subtitle F—Member Education, Training, and Transition Sec. 551. Counseling in the Transition Assistance Program regarding sexual assault, sexual or gender harassment, and intimate partner violence. Sec. 552. Establishment of mentoring and career counseling program. Sec. 553. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center. Sec. 554. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center. Sec. 555. Increase in number of permanent professors at the United States Air Force Academy. Sec. 556. Information on nominations and applications for military service academies. Sec. 557. Transformation of the professional military education enterprise. Sec. 558. College of International Security Affairs of the National Defense University. Sec. 559. Public-private consortium to improve professional military education. Subtitle G—Military Family Readiness and Dependents’ Education Sec. 561. Family readiness: definitions; communication strategy; report. Sec. 562. Support services for members of special operations forces and immediate family members. Sec. 563. Authority to provide financial assistance to certain in-home child care providers for members of the Armed Forces and survivors of members who die in combat in the line of duty. Sec. 564. Expansion of financial assistance under My Career Advancement Account program. Sec. 565. Child care. Sec. 566. Continuation of paid parental leave upon death of child. Sec. 567. Study and report on the performance of the Department of Defense Education Activity. Sec. 568. Comptroller General of the United States report on the structural condition of Department of Defense Education Activity schools. Sec. 569. Pilot program to expand eligibility for enrollment at domestic dependent elementary and secondary schools. Sec. 569A. Continued assistance to schools with significant numbers of military dependent students. Sec. 569B. Standardization of the Exceptional Family Member Program. Subtitle H—Diversity and Inclusion Sec. 571. Diversity and inclusion reporting requirements. Sec. 572. Establishment of Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Council of the Department of Defense. Sec. 573. Establishment of Special Inspector General for Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Armed Forces; amendments to Inspector General Act. Sec. 574. Questions regarding racism, anti-Semitism, and supremacism in workplace surveys administered by the Secretary of Defense. Sec. 575. Report on demographics of officers appointed to certain grades. Sec. 576. Plans to increase female and minority representation in the Armed Forces. Sec. 577. Evaluation of barriers to minority participation in certain units of the Armed Forces. Subtitle I—Decorations and Awards Sec. 581. Establishment of the Atomic Veterans Service Medal. Sec. 582. Authorization for award of the distinguished-service cross for Ramiro F. Olivo for acts of valor during the Vietnam War. Subtitle J—Miscellaneous Reports and Other Matters Sec. 591. Expansion of Department of Defense STARBASE Program. Sec. 592. Inclusion of certain outlying areas in the Department of Defense STARBASE Program. Sec. 593. Prohibition on charging for or counting certain acronyms on headstones of individuals interred at Arlington National Cemetery. Sec. 594. Report on placement of members of the Armed Forces in academic status who are victims of sexual assault onto Non-Rated Periods. Sec. 595. Sense of Congress regarding advertising recruiting efforts. Title VI—COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances Sec. 601. Increase in basic pay. Sec. 602. Basic needs allowance for low-income regular members. Sec. 603. Reorganization of certain allowances other than travel and transportation allowances. Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special Incentive Pays Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain expiring bonus and special pay authorities. Sec. 612. Increase in certain hazardous duty incentive pay for members of the uniformed services. Sec. 613. Standardization of payment of hazardous duty incentive pay for members of the uniformed services. Sec. 614. Clarification of 30 days of continuous duty on board a ship required for family separation allowance for members of the uniformed services. Sec. 615. Expansion of reimbursable State licensure and certification costs for a military spouse arising from relocation. Subtitle C—Family and Survivor Benefits Sec. 621. Expansion of authority to provide financial assistance to civilian providers of child care services or youth program services for survivors of members of the Armed Forces who die in the line of duty. Sec. 622. Expansion of death gratuity for ROTC graduates. Sec. 623. Recalculation of financial assistance for providers of child care services and youth program services for dependents. Sec. 624. Priority for certain military family housing to a member of the Armed Forces whose spouse agrees to provide family home day care services. Sec. 625. Study on feasibility of TSP contributions by military spouses. Subtitle D—Defense Resale Matters Sec. 631 . Base responders essential needs and dining access. Sec. 632. First responder access to mobile exchanges. Sec. 633. Updated business case analysis for consolidation of the defense resale system. Subtitle E—Other Personnel Benefits Sec. 641. Maintenance of funding for Stars and Stripes. Title VII—Health Care Provisions Subtitle A—TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits Sec. 701. Expansion of mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 702. Mandatory referral for mental health evaluation. Sec. 703. Assessments and testing relating to exposure to perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances. Sec. 704. Improvement to breast cancer screening. Subtitle B—Health Care Administration Sec. 711. Protection of the Armed Forces from infectious diseases. Sec. 712. Inclusion of drugs, biological products, and critical medical supplies in national security strategy for national technology and industrial base. Sec. 713. Contract authority of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. Sec. 714. Extension of organization requirements for Defense Health Agency. Sec. 715. Modification to limitation on the realignment or reduction of military medical manning end strength. Sec. 716. Modifications to implementation plan for restructure or realignment of military medical treatment facilities. Sec. 717. Policy to address opioid prescription abuse prevention. Sec. 718. Addition of burn pit registration to electronic health records of members of the Armed Forces and veterans. Subtitle C—Matters relating to COVID–19 Sec. 721. COVID–19 military health system review panel. Sec. 722. COVID–19 global war on pandemics. Sec. 723. Registry of TRICARE beneficiaries diagnosed with COVID–19. Subtitle D—Reports and Other Matters Sec. 731. Modifications to pilot program on civilian and military partnerships to enhance interoperability and medical surge capability and capacity of national disaster medical system. Sec. 732. Reports on suicide among members of the Armed Forces and suicide prevention programs and activities of the Department of Defense. Sec. 733. Clarification of research under Joint Trauma Education and Training Directorate and inclusion of military working dogs. Sec. 734. Extension of the Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Project. Sec. 735. Information sharing by Secretary of Defense regarding prevention of infant and maternal mortality. Sec. 736. Grant program for increased cooperation on post-traumatic stress disorder research between United States and Israel. Sec. 737. Pilot program on cryopreservation and storage. Sec. 738. Pilot program on parents serving as certified nursing assistants for children under TRICARE program. Sec. 739. Study on incidence of cancer diagnosis and mortality among pilots in the Armed Forces. Sec. 740. Report on diet and nutrition of members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 741. Report on costs and benefits of allowing retired members of the Armed Forces to contribute to health savings accounts. Sec. 742. Study on toxic exposure at Karshi–Khanabad Air Base, Uzbekistan. Sec. 743. Audit of medical conditions of tenants in privatized military housing. Sec. 744. Report on Integrated Disability Evaluation System. Sec. 745. Review and report on prevention of suicide among members of the Armed Forces stationed at remote installations outside the contiguous United States. Subtitle E—Mental health services from Department of Veterans Affairs for members of reserve components Sec. 751. Short title. Sec. 752. Expansion of eligibility for readjustment counseling and related outpatient services from Department of Veterans Affairs to include members of reserve components of the Armed Forces. Sec. 753. Provision of mental health services from Department of Veterans Affairs to members of reserve components of the Armed Forces. Sec. 754. Inclusion of members of reserve components in mental health programs of Department of Veterans Affairs. Sec. 755. Report on mental health and related services provided by Department of Veterans Affairs to members of the Armed Forces. Title VIII—Acquisition Policy, Acquisition Management, and Related Matters Subtitle A—Acquisition Policy and Management Sec. 801. Congressional notification of termination of a middle tier acquisition program. Sec. 802. Modification to the definition of nontraditional defense contractor. Sec. 803. Major weapon systems: life-cycle sustainment plan. Sec. 804. Contractor business systems. Sec. 805. Acquisition authority of the Director of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center. Sec. 806. Reforming the Department of Defense. Sec. 807. Alternative Space Acquisition System for the United States Space Force. Subtitle B—Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and Limitations Sec. 811. Sustainment reform for the Department of Defense. Sec. 812. Modifications to Comptroller General assessment of acquisition programs and related initiatives. Sec. 813. Contractor whistleblower protections relating to nondisclosure agreements. Sec. 814. Competition requirements for purchases from Federal Prison Industries. Sec. 815. Disclosure of beneficial owners in database for Federal agency contract and grant officers. Sec. 816. Inclusion of optical transmission components in the analytical framework for supply chain risks. Sec. 817. Amendment to definition of qualified apprentice. Sec. 818. Contract closeout authority for services contracts. Sec. 819. Plan to improve Department-wide management of investments in weapon systems. Subtitle C—Industrial Base Matters Sec. 821. Quarterly national technology and industrial base briefings. Sec. 822. Expansion on the prohibition on acquiring certain metal products. Sec. 823. Requirement that certain ship components be manufactured in the national technology and industrial base. Sec. 824. Preference for sourcing rare earth materials from the national technology and industrial base. Sec. 825. Enhanced domestic content requirement for major defense acquisition programs. Sec. 826. Additional requirements pertaining to printed circuit boards. Sec. 827. Report on use of domestic nonavailability determinations. Sec. 828. Sense of Congress on the prohibition on certain telecommunications and video surveillance services or equipment. Subtitle D—Small Business Matters Sec. 831. Transfer of verification of small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans or service-disabled veterans to the Small Business Administration. Sec. 832. Equitable adjustments to certain construction contracts. Sec. 833. Exemption of certain contracts awarded to small business concerns from category management requirements. Sec. 834. Report on accelerated payments to certain small business concerns. Subtitle E—Other Matters Sec. 841. Modifications to supervision and award of certain contracts. Sec. 842. Amendments to submissions to Congress relating to certain foreign military sales. Sec. 843. Revisions to requirement to use firm fixed-price contracts for foreign military sales. Sec. 844. Small Business Industrial Base Resiliency Program. Sec. 845. Requirements relating to reports and limitations on the availability of funds. Sec. 846. Assessment of the requirements processes of the military departments. Sec. 847. Report on transfer and consolidation of certain defense acquisition statutes. Title IX—Department of Defense Organization and Management Subtitle A—Office of the Secretary of Defense and Related Matters Sec. 901. Repeal of position of Chief Management Officer. Sec. 902. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Base Policy. Subtitle B—Other Department of Defense Organization and Management Matters Sec. 911. Limitation on reduction of civilian workforce. Sec. 912. Chief Diversity Officers. Sec. 913. Establishment of Deputy Assistant Secretaries for Sustainment. Sec. 914. Office of Defense Community Cooperation and Economic Adjustment. Sec. 915. Input from Chief of National Guard Bureau to the Joint Requirements Oversight Council. Sec. 916. Redesignation of the Joint Forces Staff College. Subtitle C—Space Matters Sec. 921. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space and Strategic Deterrence Policy. Sec. 922. Office of the Chief of Space Operations. Sec. 923. Space Force Medal. Sec. 924. Clarification of procurement of commercial satellite communications services. Sec. 925. Temporary exemption from authorized daily average of members in pay grades E–8 and E–9. Sec. 926. One-time uniform allowance for members transferred to the Space Force. Title X—General Provisions Subtitle A—Financial Matters Sec. 1001. General transfer authority. Sec. 1002. Determination of budgetary effects. Sec. 1003. Pandemic Preparedness and Resilience National Security Fund. Sec. 1004. Budget materials for special operations forces. Subtitle B—Counterdrug Activities Sec. 1011. Support for counterdrug activities and activities to counter transnational organized crime affecting flow of drugs into the United States. Sec. 1012. Congressional notification with respect to Department of Defense support provided to other United States agencies for counterdrug activities and activities to counter transnational organized crime. Subtitle C—Naval Vessels Sec. 1021. Limitation on availability of certain funds without naval vessels plan and certification. Sec. 1022. Limitations on use of funds in the National Defense Sealift Fund for purchase of foreign constructed vessels. Sec. 1023. Use of National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund for incrementally funded contracts to provide full funding for Columbia class submarines. Sec. 1024. Preference for United States vessels in transporting supplies by sea. Sec. 1025. Restrictions on overhaul, repair, etc. of naval vessels in foreign shipyards. Sec. 1026. Biannual report on shipbuilder training and the defense industrial base. Sec. 1027. Prohibition on use of funds for retirement of certain littoral combat ships. Sec. 1028. Report on implementation of Commandant’s Planning Guidance. Sec. 1029. Limitation on naval force structure changes. Subtitle D—Counterterrorism Sec. 1031. Prohibition on use of funds for transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to certain countries. Subtitle E—Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations Sec. 1041. Support of special operations to combat terrorism. Sec. 1042. Prohibition on retirement of nuclear powered aircraft carriers before first refueling. Sec. 1043. Required minimum inventory of tactical airlift aircraft. Sec. 1044. Modification and technical correction to Department of Defense authority to provide assistance along the southern land border of the United States. Sec. 1045. Battlefield airborne communications node certification requirement. Sec. 1046. Requirements relating to newest generations of personal protective equipment. Sec. 1047. Prohibition on use of funds for retirement of A-10 aircraft. Sec. 1048. Mandatory criteria for strategic basing decisions. Sec. 1049. Limitation on use of funds pending public availability of top-line numbers of deployed members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 1050. Limitation on physical move, integration, reassignment, or shift in responsibility of Marine Forces Northern Command. Sec. 1051. Conditions for permanently basing United States equipment or additional forces in host countries with at-risk vendors in 5G or 6G networks. Title XI—Civilian Personnel Matters Subtitle A—General Provisions Sec. 1101. Family and medical leave amendments. Sec. 1102. Limitation on authority to exclude employees from chapter 71 Sec. 1103. Authority to provide travel and transportation allowances in connection with transfer ceremonies of department of defense and coast guard civilian employees who die overseas. Sec. 1104. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for federal civilian employees working overseas. Sec. 1105. One-year extension of temporary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to civilian personnel on official duty in a combat zone. Sec. 1106. Limiting the number of local wage areas defined within a pay locality. Sec. 1107. Civilian Faculty At the Defense Security Cooperation University and Institute of Security Governance. Sec. 1108. Expansion of authority for appointment of recently-retired members of the armed forces to positions at certain industrial base facilities. Sec. 1109. Fire Fighters Alternative Work Schedule demonstration project. Sec. 1110. Special rules for certain monthly workers’ compensation payments and other payments for Federal Government personnel under chief of mission authority. Subtitle B—Elijah E. Cummings Federal Employee Antidiscrimination Act of 2020 Sec. 1121. Short title. Sec. 1122. Sense of Congress. Sec. 1123. Notification of violation. Sec. 1124. Reporting requirements. Sec. 1125. Data to be posted by employing Federal agencies. Sec. 1126. Data to be posted by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Sec. 1127. Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 amendments. Sec. 1128. Nondisclosure agreement limitation. Title XII—Matters relating to foreign nations Subtitle A—Assistance and training Sec. 1201. Modification and extension of support of special operations for irregular warfare. Sec. 1202. Department of Defense participation in European Program on Multilateral Exchange of Surface Transportation Services. Sec. 1203. Extension of authority to transfer excess high mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles to foreign countries. Sec. 1204. Modification and extension of update of Department of Defense Freedom of Navigation Report. Sec. 1205. Extension of report on workforce development. Subtitle B—Matters relating to Afghanistan and Pakistan Sec. 1211. Extension and modification of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations. Sec. 1212. Extension of the Afghan Special Immigrant Visa Program. Sec. 1213. Limitation on use of funds to reduce deployment to Afghanistan. Sec. 1214. Report on Operation Freedom Sentinel. Subtitle C—Matters relating to Syria, Iraq, and Iran Sec. 1221. Extension and modification of authority to provide assistance to counter the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. Sec. 1222. Extension of authority to provide assistance to the vetted Syrian opposition. Sec. 1223. Extension of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq. Sec. 1224. Prohibition on provision of weapons and other forms of support to certain organizations. Sec. 1225. Consolidated budget display and report on Operation Spartan Shield. Sec. 1226. Sense of Congress on Peshmerga forces as a partner in Operation Inherent Resolve. Subtitle D—Matters relating to Russia Sec. 1231. Prohibition on availability of funds relating to sovereignty of the Russian Federation over Crimea. Sec. 1232. Extension of limitation on military cooperation between the United States and the Russian Federation. Sec. 1233. Modification and extension of Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative. Sec. 1234. United States participation in the Open Skies Treaty. Subtitle E—Matters relating to Europe and NATO Sec. 1241. Limitations on use of funds to reduce the total number of members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty who are stationed in Germany, to reduce the total number of members of the Armed Forces stationed in Europe, and to divest military infrastructure in Europe. Sec. 1242. Sense of Congress on support for coordinated action to ensure the security of Baltic allies. Sec. 1243. Sense of Congress on support for Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Sec. 1244. Sense of Congress on support for Georgia. Sec. 1245. Sense of Congress on burden sharing by partners and allies. Sec. 1246. Sense of Congress on NATO’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Subtitle F—Matters relating to the Indo-Pacific region Sec. 1251. Indo-Pacific Reassurance Initiative. Sec. 1252. Limitation on use of funds to reduce the total number of members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty who are deployed to South Korea. Sec. 1253. Implementation of GAO recommendations on preparedness of United States forces to counter North Korean chemical and biological weapons. Sec. 1254. Public reporting of Chinese military companies operating in the United States. Sec. 1255. Independent study on the defense industrial base of the People’s Republic of China. Sec. 1256. Report on China’s One Belt, One Road Initiative in Africa. Sec. 1257. Sense of Congress on enhancement of the United States-Taiwan defense relationship. Sec. 1258. Report on supply chain security cooperation with Taiwan. Sec. 1259. Report on United States-Taiwan medical security partnership. Subtitle G—Other matters Sec. 1261. Provision of goods and services to Kwajalein Atoll. Sec. 1262. Annual briefings on certain foreign military bases of adversaries. Sec. 1263. Report on progress of the Department of Defense with respect to denying a fait accompli by a strategic competitor against a covered defense partner. Sec. 1264. Modification to requirements of the initiative to support protection of national security academic researchers from undue influence and other security threats. Sec. 1265. Report on directed use of fishing fleets. Sec. 1266. Expanding the state partnership program in Africa. Sec. 1267. Report relating to reduction in the total number of United States Armed Forces deployed to United States Africa Command area of responsibility. Sec. 1268. Report on enhancing partnerships between the United States and African countries. Sec. 1269. Sense of Congress with respect to Qatar. Sec. 1270. Sense of Congress on United States military support for and participation in the Multinational Force and Observers. Sec. 1271. Prohibition on support for military participation against the Houthis. Sec. 1272. Rule of construction relating to use of military force. Title XIII—Cooperative Threat Reduction Sec. 1301. Funding allocations; specification of cooperative threat reduction funds. Title XIV—Other authorizations Subtitle A—Military programs Sec. 1401. Working capital funds. Sec. 1402. Chemical agents and munitions destruction, defense. Sec. 1403. Drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, defense-wide. Sec. 1404. Defense Inspector General. Sec. 1405. Defense health program. Sec. 1406. National defense sealift fund. Subtitle B—Other matters Sec. 1411. Authority for transfer of funds to joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility demonstration fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois. Sec. 1412. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home. Title XV—Authorization of additional appropriations for overseas contingency operations Subtitle A—Authorization of appropriations Sec. 1501. Purpose. Sec. 1502. Procurement. Sec. 1503. Research, development, test, and evaluation. Sec. 1504. Operation and maintenance. Sec. 1505. Military personnel. Sec. 1506. Working capital funds. Sec. 1507. Drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, defense-wide. Sec. 1508. Defense Inspector General. Sec. 1509. Defense Health Program. Subtitle B—Financial matters Sec. 1511. Treatment as additional authorizations. Sec. 1512. Special transfer authority. Subtitle C—Other matters Sec. 1521. Afghanistan security forces fund. Title XVI—Strategic Programs, Cyber, and Intelligence Matters Subtitle A—Space Activities Sec. 1601. National Security Space Launch program. Sec. 1602. Requirement to buy certain satellite component from national technology and industrial base. Sec. 1603. Commercial space domain awareness capabilities. Sec. 1604. Responsive satellite infrastructure. Sec. 1605. Policy to ensure launch of small-class payloads. Sec. 1606. Tactically responsive space launch operations. Sec. 1607. Limitation on availability of funds for prototype program for multi-global navigation satellite system receiver development. Sec. 1608. Limitation on awarding contracts to entities operating commercial terrestrial communication networks that cause interference with the Global Positioning System. Sec. 1609. Prohibition on availability of funds for certain purposes relating to the Global Positioning System. Sec. 1610. Report on resilient protected communications satellites. Subtitle B—Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities Sec. 1611. Validation of capability requirements of National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. Sec. 1612. Safety of navigation mission of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. Sec. 1613. National Academies Climate Security Roundtable. Sec. 1614. Report on risk to national security posed by quantum computing technologies. Subtitle C—Cyberspace-Related Matters Sec. 1621. Cyber mission forces and cyberspace operations forces. Sec. 1622. Cyberspace solarium commission. Sec. 1623. Tailored cyberspace operations organizations. Sec. 1624. Responsibility for the Sector Risk Management Agency function of the Department of Defense. Sec. 1625. Department of Defense Cyber Workforce Efforts. Sec. 1626. Reporting requirements for cross domain compromises and exemptions to policies for information technology. Sec. 1627. Assessing private-public collaboration in cybersecurity. Sec. 1628. Cyber capabilities and interoperability of the National Guard. Sec. 1629. Evaluation of non-traditional cyber support to the Department of Defense. Sec. 1630. Establishment of integrated cyber center. Sec. 1631. Cyber threat information collaboration environment. Sec. 1632. Defense industrial base participation in a threat intelligence sharing program. Sec. 1633. Assistance for small manufacturers in the defense industrial supply chain on matters relating to cybersecurity. Sec. 1634. Defense industrial base cybersecurity threat hunting and sensing, discovery, and mitigation. Sec. 1635. Defense Digital Service. Sec. 1636. Limitation of funding for National Defense University. Subtitle D—Nuclear forces Sec. 1641. Coordination in transfer of funds by Department of Defense to National Nuclear Security Administration. Sec. 1642. Exercises of nuclear command, control, and communications system. Sec. 1643. Independent studies on nuclear weapons programs of certain foreign states. Subtitle E—Missile Defense Programs Sec. 1651. Extension and modification of requirement for Comptroller General of the United States review and assessment of missile defense acquisition programs. Sec. 1652. Extension of transition of ballistic missile defense programs to military departments. Sec. 1653. Development of hypersonic and ballistic missile tracking space sensor payload. Sec. 1654. Annual certification on hypersonic and ballistic missile tracking space sensor payload. Sec. 1655. Alignment of the Missile Defense Agency within the Department of Defense. Sec. 1656. Analysis of alternatives for homeland missile defense missions. Sec. 1657. Next generation interceptors. Sec. 1658. Oversight of next generation interceptor program. Sec. 1659. Missile defense cooperation between the United States and Israel. Sec. 1660. Report on defense of Guam from integrated air and missile threats. Sec. 1661. Report on cruise missile defense. Subtitle F—Other Matters Sec. 1671. Conventional prompt global strike. Sec. 1672. Submission of reports under Missile Defense Review and Nuclear Posture Review. Sec. 1673. Report on consideration of risks of inadvertent escalation to nuclear war. Title XVII—Reports and Other Matters Subtitle A—Studies and Reports Sec. 1701. Review of support of special operations to combat terrorism. Sec. 1702. FFRDC study of explosive ordnance disposal agencies. Sec. 1703. Report on the Human Rights Office at United States Southern Command. Sec. 1704. Report on joint training range exercises for the Pacific region. Sec. 1705. Study on Chinese policies and influence in the development of international standards for emerging technologies. Subtitle B—Electronic Message Preservation Sec. 1711. Short title. Sec. 1712. Preservation of electronic messages and other records. Sec. 1713. Presidential records. Subtitle C—Space Technology Advancement Report (STAR) Act of 2020 Sec. 1721. Short title. Sec. 1722. Findings. Sec. 1723. Report; strategy. Subtitle D—AMBER Alert Nationwide Sec. 1731. Cooperation with Department of Homeland Security. Sec. 1732. AMBER Alerts along major transportation routes. Sec. 1733. AMBER Alert communication plans in the territories. Sec. 1734. Government Accountability Office report. Subtitle E—Other Matters Sec. 1741. Technical, conforming, and clerical amendments. Sec. 1742. Addition of Chief of the National Guard Bureau to the list of officers providing reports of unfunded priorities. Sec. 1743. Acceptance of property by military academies and museums. Sec. 1744. Reauthorization of National Oceanographic Partnership Program. Sec. 1745. Requirements relating to program and project management. Sec. 1746. Quarterly briefings on Joint All Domain Command and Control concept. Sec. 1747. Resources to implement a Department of Defense policy on civilian casualties in connection with United States military operations. Sec. 1748. Sense of Congress regarding reporting of civilian casualties resulting from United States military operations. Sec. 1749. Prohibition of public display of Confederate battle flag on Department of Defense property. Sec. 1750. Deployment of real-time status of special use airspace. Sec. 1751. Duties of Secretary under Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act. Sec. 1752. Publicly available database of casualties of members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 1753. Notice and comment for proposed actions of the Secretary of Defense relating to food and beverage ingredients. Sec. 1754. Space strategies and assessment. Sec. 1755. Nonimmigrant status for certain nationals of Portugal. Sec. 1756. Sense of Congress on extension of limitations on importation of uranium from Russian Federation. Sec. 1757. Authority to establish a movement coordination center pacific in the Indopacific region. Sec. 1758. Establishment of vetting procedures and monitoring requirements for certain military training. Sec. 1759. Women, Peace, and Security Act implementation. Sec. 1760. Developing crisis capabilities to meet needs for homeland security-critical supplies. Sec. 1761. Establishment of western emergency refined petroleum products reserve. Division B—Military Construction Authorizations Sec. 2001. Short title. Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law. Sec. 2003. Effective date. Title XXI—Army Military Construction Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2102. Family housing. Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army. Sec. 2104. Limitation on military construction project at Kwajalein Atoll. Sec. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2017 project. Title XXII—Navy Military Construction Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2202. Family housing and improvements to military family housing units. Sec. 2203. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. Title XXIII—Air Force Military Construction Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2302. Family housing and improvements to military family housing units. Sec. 2303. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force. Sec. 2304. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2018 project. Sec. 2305. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2019 projects. Sec. 2306. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2020 projects. Sec. 2307. Technical corrections related to authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2020 family housing projects. Title XXIV—Defense Agencies Military Construction Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2402. Authorized Energy Resilience and Conservation Investment Program projects. Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies. Sec. 2404. Military construction infrastructure and weapon system synchronization for Ground Based Strategic Deterrent. Title XXV—International Programs Subtitle A—North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO. Subtitle B—Host Country In-Kind Contributions Sec. 2511. Republic of Korea funded construction projects. Sec. 2512. State of Qatar funded construction projects. Title XXVI—Guard and Reserve Forces Facilities Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve. Sec. 2607. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2020 project. Title XXVII—Base Realignment and Closure Activities Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense base closure account. Title XXVIII—Military Construction General Provisions Subtitle A—Military Construction Program Changes Sec. 2801. Modification and clarification of construction authority in the event of a declaration of war or national emergency. Sec. 2802. Extension of sunset for annual locality adjustment of dollar thresholds applicable to unspecified minor military construction authorities. Sec. 2803. Modification of reporting requirement regarding cost increases associated with certain military construction projects and military family housing projects. Sec. 2804. Expansion of Department of Defense land exchange authority. Sec. 2805. Congressional project authorization required for military construction projects for energy resilience, energy security, and energy conservation. Sec. 2806. One-year extension of temporary, limited authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects in certain areas outside the United States. Sec. 2807. Pilot Program to support combatant command military construction priorities. Sec. 2808. Biannual report regarding military installations supported by disaster relief appropriations. Subtitle B—Military Family Housing Reforms Sec. 2811. Expenditure priorities in using Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund. Sec. 2812. Promulgation of guidance to facilitate return of military families displaced from privatized military housing. Sec. 2813. Promulgation of guidance on mold mitigation in privatized military housing. Sec. 2814. Expansion of uniform code of basic standards for privatized military housing and hazard and habitability inspection and assessment requirements to Government-owned and Government-controlled military family housing. Sec. 2815. Establishment of Exceptional Family Member Program housing liaison. Sec. 2816. Department of Defense report on criteria and metrics used to evaluate performance of landlords of privatized military housing that receive incentive fees. Sec. 2817. Report on Department of Defense efforts regarding oversight and role in management of privatized military housing. Subtitle C—Real Property and Facilities Administration Sec. 2821. Codification of reporting requirements regarding United States overseas military enduring locations and contingency locations. Sec. 2822. Limitations on renewal of utility privatization contracts. Sec. 2823. Vesting exercise of discretion with Service Secretaries regarding entering into longer-term contracts for utility services. Sec. 2824. Use of on-site energy production to promote military installation energy resilience and energy security. Sec. 2825. Availability of Energy Resilience and Conservation Investment Program funds for certain activities related to privatized utility systems. Sec. 2826. Improving water management and security on military installations. Sec. 2827. Pilot program to test use of emergency diesel generators in a microgrid configuration at certain military installations. Sec. 2828. Improved electrical metering of Department of Defense infrastructure supporting critical missions. Sec. 2829. Renaming certain military installations and other defense property. Subtitle D—Land Conveyances Sec. 2831. Land conveyance, Camp Navajo, Arizona. Sec. 2832. Modification of land exchange involving Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, Sunnyvale, California. Sec. 2833. Land conveyance, Sharpe Army Depot, lathrop, California. Sec. 2834. Land exchange, San Bernardino County, California. Sec. 2835. Land conveyance, Over-the-Horizon Backscatter Radar System receiving station, Modoc County, California. Sec. 2836. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Naval Support Activity Panama City, Florida, parcel. Subtitle E—Military Land Withdrawals Sec. 2841. Renewal of land withdrawal and reservation to benefit Naval Air Facility, El Centro, California. Sec. 2842. Renewal of Fallon Range Training Complex land withdrawal and reservation. Sec. 2843. Renewal of Nevada Test and Training Range land withdrawal and reservation. Sec. 2844. Co-management, new memorandum of understanding, and additional requirements regarding Nevada Test and Training Range. Sec. 2845. Specified duration of White Sands Missile Range land withdrawal and reservation and establishment of special reservation area for northern and western extension areas. Subtitle F—Asia-Pacific and Indo-Pacific Issues Sec. 2851. Change to biennial reporting requirement for Interagency Coordination Group of Inspectors General for Guam Realignment. Sec. 2852. Additional exception to restriction on development of public infrastructure in connection with realignment of Marine Corps forces in Asia-Pacific region. Sec. 2853. Development of master plan for infrastructure to support rotational Armed Forces in Australia. Sec. 2854. Study and strategy regarding bulk fuels management in United States Indo-Pacific Command Area of Responsibility. Subtitle G—Other Matters Sec. 2861. Defense Community Infrastructure Program. Sec. 2862. Pilot program on reduction of effects of military aviation noise on certain covered property. Sec. 2863. Department of Defense policy for regulation of dangerous dogs in military communities. Title XXIX—Overseas Contingency Operations Military Construction Sec. 2901. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2902. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2903. Authorization of appropriations. Division C—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS Title XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS Subtitle A—National Security Programs and Authorizations Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration. Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup. Sec. 3103. Other defense activities. Sec. 3104. Nuclear energy. Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions, Limitations, and Other Matters Sec. 3111. Nuclear warhead acquisition processes. Sec. 3112. Uncosted and unobligated amounts of National Nuclear Security Administration. Sec. 3113. Extension of limitation relating to reclassification of high-level waste. Sec. 3114. Extension of pilot program on unavailability for overhead costs of amounts specified for laboratory-directed research and development. Sec. 3115. Plutonium pit production. Sec. 3116. Program for research and development of advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium. Sec. 3117. Independent study on effects of use of nuclear weapons. Sec. 3118. Reports on diversity of certain contractor employees of National Nuclear Security Administration. Sec. 3119. Findings, purpose, and apology relating to fallout emitted during the Government's atmospheric nuclear tests. Sec. 3120. Sense of Congress regarding uranium mining and nuclear testing. Title XXXII—Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Sec. 3201. Authorization. Title XXXIV—Naval Petroleum Reserves Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations. Title XXXV—Maritime Matters Subtitle A—Maritime Administration Sec. 3501. Authorization of the Maritime Administration. Sec. 3502. Sense of Congress regarding role of domestic maritime industry in national security. Sec. 3503. Nonapplicability of requirement relating to minimum number of operating days for vessels operating under MSP Operating Agreements. Sec. 3504. Improvements to process for waiving navigation and vessel-inspection laws. Subtitle B—Tanker Security Fleet Sec. 3511. Tanker Security Fleet. Division D—Funding Tables Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables. Title XLI—Procurement Sec. 4101. Procurement. Sec. 4102. Procurement for overseas contingency operations. Title XLII—Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation Sec. 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation. Sec. 4202. Research, development, test, and evaluation for overseas contingency operations. Title XLIII—Operation and Maintenance Sec. 4301. Operation and maintenance. Sec. 4302. Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations. Title XLIV—Military Personnel Sec. 4401. Military personnel. Sec. 4402. Military personnel for overseas contingency operations. Title XLV—Other Authorizations Sec. 4501. Other authorizations. Sec. 4502. Other authorizations for overseas contingency operations. Title XLVI—Military Construction Sec. 4601. Military construction. Sec. 4602. Military construction for overseas contingency operations. Title XLVII—Department of Energy National Security Programs Sec. 4701. Department of energy national security programs. Division E—National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 Sec. 5001. Short title. Sec. 5002. Findings. Sec. 5003. Definitions. Title I—National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Sec. 5101. National Artificial Intelligence Initiative. Sec. 5102. National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Office. Sec. 5103. Coordination by Interagency Committee. Sec. 5104. National Artificial Intelligence Advisory Committee. Sec. 5105. National Academies artificial intelligence impact study on workforce. Sec. 5106. GAO report on computational needs. Sec. 5107. National AI Research Resource Task Force. Sec. 5108. Sense of Congress. Title II—National Artificial Intelligence Research Institutes Sec. 5201. National Artificial Intelligence Research Institutes. Title III—National Institute of Standards and Technology Artificial Intelligence Activities Sec. 5301. National Institute of Standards and Technology activities. Title IV—National Science Foundation Artificial Intelligence Activities Sec. 5401. Artificial intelligence research and education. Title V—Department of Energy Artificial Intelligence Research Program Sec. 5501. Department of Energy Artificial Intelligence Research Program. 3. Congressional defense committees In this Act, the term congressional defense committees A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS I PROCUREMENT A Authorization Of Appropriations 101. Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for procurement for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4101. B Navy Programs 111. Independent cost estimate of FFG(X) frigate program In accordance with section 2334(b) of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that an independent cost estimate of the full life-cycle cost of the FFG(X) frigate program of the Navy has been completed before the conclusion of milestone B of such program. C Air Force Programs 121. Modification of force structure objectives for B–1 bomber aircraft (a) Modification of minimum inventory requirement Section 9062(h)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 36 24 (b) Temporary authority to retire aircraft (1) In general Notwithstanding section 9062(h)(1) of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Air Force may retire up to seventeen B–1 aircraft. (2) Termination of authority The authority of the Secretary of the Air Force to retire aircraft under paragraph (1) shall terminate on January 1, 2023. (c) Preservation of certain aircraft and maintenance personnel Until the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force determines that the B–21 aircraft has attained initial operating capability, the Secretary— (1) shall preserve each B–1 aircraft that is retired under subsection (b), in a manner that ensures the components and parts of such aircraft are maintained in reclaimable condition that is consistent with type 2000 recallable storage, or better; and (2) may not reduce the number of billets assigned to maintenance of B–1 aircraft in effect on January 1, 2020. 122. Extension of limitation on availability of funds for retirement of RC–135 aircraft Section 148(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 for fiscal year 2020 for any of fiscal years 2020 through 2025 123. Modification of limitation on availability of funds for retirement of E–8 JSTARS aircraft Section 147(a) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 certifies to the congressional defense committees that Increment 2 of the Advanced Battle-Management System of the Air Force has declared initial operational capability as defined in the Capability Development Document for the System certifies to the congressional defense committees that— (1) the Secretary has identified a replacement capability and capacity for the current fleet of 16 E–8 Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System aircraft to meet global combatant command requirements; and (2) such replacement delivers capabilities that are comparable or superior to the capabilities delivered by such aircraft. . 124. Limitation on availability of funds for the Advanced Battle Management System pending certification relating to RQ–4 aircraft (a) Limitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for the Department of the Air Force for the Advanced Battle Management System, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until— (1) the Secretary of the Air Force certifies, in writing, to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives that the Secretary will not retire, or prepare to retire, any RQ–4 aircraft during fiscal year 2021; (2) (A) the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment certifies, in writing, to such Committees that, with respect to the RQ–4 aircraft, the validated operating and sustainment costs of any capability developed to replace the RQ–4 aircraft are less than the validated operating and sustainment costs for the RQ–4 aircraft on a comparable flight-hour cost basis; and (B) the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council certifies, in writing, to such Committees that any such capability to be fielded at the same time or before the retirement of the RQ–4 aircraft would result in equal or greater capability available to the commanders of the combatant commands and would not result in less capacity available to the commanders of the combatant commands; or (3) the Secretary of Defense— (A) certifies, in writing, to such Committees that the Secretary has determined, after analyzing sufficient and relevant data, that a capability superior to the RQ–4 aircraft is worth increased operating and sustainment costs; and (B) provides to such Committees analysis supporting such determination. (b) Consultation requirement Before issuing a certification under subsection (a), the official responsible for issuing such certification shall consult with the combatant commanders on the matters covered by the certification. (c) Advanced Battle Management System defined In this section, the term Advanced Battle Management System Public Law 116–92 125. Inventory requirements for certain air refueling tanker aircraft (a) Minimum inventory requirements for KC–10A aircraft (1) Fiscal year 2021 During the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on October 1, 2021, the Secretary of the Air Force shall maintain a minimum of 50 KC–10A aircraft designated as primary mission aircraft inventory. (2) Fiscal year 2022 During the period beginning on October 1, 2021, and ending on October 1, 2022, the Secretary of the Air Force shall maintain a minimum of 38 KC–10A aircraft designated as primary mission aircraft inventory. (3) Fiscal year 2023 During the period beginning on October 1, 2022, and ending on October 1, 2023, the Secretary of the Air Force shall maintain a minimum of 26 KC–10A aircraft designated as primary mission aircraft inventory. (b) Prohibition on retirement of KC–135 aircraft (1) Prohibition Except as provided in paragraph (2), during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on October 1, 2023, the Secretary of the Air Force may not retire, or prepare to retire, any KC–135 aircraft. (2) Exception The prohibition in paragraph (1) shall not apply to individual KC–135 aircraft that the Secretary of the Air Force determines, on a case-by-case basis, to be no longer mission capable because of mishaps, other damage, or being uneconomical to repair. (c) KC–135 aircraft fleet management None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to reduce the number of KC–135 aircraft designated as primary mission aircraft inventory. (d) Primary mission aircraft inventory defined In this section, the term primary mission aircraft inventory 126. Limitation on production of KC–46A aircraft (a) Limitation None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for the Air Force may be used to approve the full-rate production of KC–46A aircraft or enter into a contract for the production of more than twelve KC–46A aircraft until the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force certifies to the congressional defense committees that all category-one deficiencies in the systems of the aircraft have been corrected, including the deficiencies affecting the aircraft’s remote visioning system, telescoping actuator in the boom system, and primary fuel containment system. (b) Report Not later than February 1, 2021, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the KC–46A aircraft. The report shall include— (1) a schedule for the correction of each category-one deficiency described in subsection (a); (2) a plan to engage an independent test organization to verify the effectiveness of any proposed solutions to such category-one deficiencies; and (3) an acquisition strategy for the aircraft that— (A) identifies principal acquisition milestones; and (B) will ensure that there is sufficient competition for the procurement of a nondevelopmental tanker aircraft at the conclusion of the KC–46A production contract in effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act. (c) Category-one deficiency defined The term category-one deficiency (1) death or severe injury to personnel; or (2) major loss or damage to critical aircraft capabilities. 127. Assessment and certification relating to OC–135 aircraft (a) Limitation Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to retire, divest, realign, or place in storage or on backup aircraft inventory status, or prepare to retire, divest, realign, or place in storage or backup inventory status, any OC–135 aircraft until a period of 90 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees— (1) the report required under subsection (c); and (2) the certification required under subsection (d). (b) Exception The limitation in subsection (a) shall not apply to— (1) individual OC–135 aircraft that the Secretary of the Air Force determines, on a case-by-case basis, to be no longer mission capable because of mishaps or other damage; or (2) funds obligated or expended— (A) for the preparation of the report required under subsection (c); or (B) for the Air Force to assess options to repurpose the OC–135 aircraft to support other mission requirements. (c) Report required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following: (1) Identification of any unclassified aerial imagery requirements that the Air Force or Air National Guard can meet using the OC–135 aircraft, a version of the aircraft that is expected to replace the OC–135, or similar aerial imagery collection and processing capabilities. (2) An assessment of the extent to which it is more appropriate for the Air Force or the Air National Guard to fulfill such requirements. (3) A comparison of the costs and effectiveness of alternative means of meeting unclassified aerial imagery requirements. (4) An assessment of the utility and cost differential of performing international treaty monitoring missions such as Olive Harvest with the OC–135 aircraft, a version of the aircraft that is expected to replace the OC–135, or similar aerial imagery collection and processing capabilities. (d) Certification required Together with the report required under subsection (c), the Secretary of the Air Force shall certify to the congressional defense committees— (1) whether there are unclassified aerial imagery requirements that the Air Force can meet with the OC–135 aircraft or a version of the aircraft that is expected to replace the OC–135; and (2) whether the Secretary has identified methods of meeting such requirements that are more effective and more efficient than meeting such requirements through the use of the OC–135 aircraft or a version of the aircraft that is expected to replace the OC–135. (e) Unclassified aerial imagery requirements defined In this section, the term unclassified aerial imagery requirements 128. Modernization plan for airborne intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (a) Modernization plan (1) In general The Secretary of the Air Force shall develop a comprehensive plan for the modernization of airborne intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance, which shall— (A) ensure the alignment between requirements, both current and future, and Air Force budget submissions to meet such requirements; and (B) inform the preparation of future defense program and budget requests by the Secretary, and the consideration of such requests by Congress. (2) Elements The plan required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An assessment of all airborne intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance missions, both current missions and those missions necessary to support the national defense strategy. (B) An analysis of platforms, capabilities, and capacities necessary to fulfill such current and future missions. (C) The anticipated life-cycle budget associated with each platform, capability, and capacity requirement for both current and future requirements. (D) An analysis showing operational, budget, and schedule trade-offs between sustainment of currently fielded capabilities, modernization of currently fielded capabilities, and development and production of new capabilities. (b) Report to Congress (1) In general Not later than March 30, 2021, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes— (A) the comprehensive modernization plan required by subsection (a); and (B) a strategy for carrying out such plan through fiscal year 2030. (2) Form The report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex. 129. Minimum bomber aircraft force level (a) In general Not later than February 1, 2021, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report with recommendations for the bomber aircraft force structure that enables the Air Force to meet the requirements of its long-range strike mission under the National Defense Strategy. (b) Elements The report required under subsection (a) shall include each of the following elements: (1) The bomber force structure necessary to meet the requirements of the Air Force’s long-range strike mission under the National Defense Strategy, including— (A) the total minimum number of bomber aircraft; and (B) the minimum number of primary mission aircraft. (2) The penetrating bomber force structure necessary to meet the requirements of the Air Force’s long-range strike mission in contested or denied environments under the National Defense Strategy, to include— (A) the total minimum number of penetrating bomber aircraft; and (B) the minimum number of primary mission penetrating bomber aircraft. (3) A roadmap outlining how the Air Force plans to reach the force structure identified under paragraphs (1) and (2), including an established goal date for achieving the minimum number of bomber aircraft. (c) Form The report submitted under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (d) Publication The Secretary shall make available to the public the unclassified form of the report submitted under subsection (a). (e) Bomber aircraft In this section, the term bomber aircraft D Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters 131. Documentation relating to the F–35 aircraft program (a) Limitation The Secretary of Defense may not grant Milestone C approval for the F–35 aircraft program pursuant to section 2366c of title 10, United States Code, or enter into a contract for the full-rate production of F–35 aircraft, until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary has submitted to the congressional defense committees all of the documentation required under subsection (b). (b) Documentation required The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the following documentation with respect to the F–35 aircraft program: (1) A certification from the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment that all alternative supply contractors for parts, required for the airframe and propulsion prime contractors of the F–35 program as a result of the removal of the Republic of Turkey from the program— (A) have been identified and all related undefinitized contract actions have been definitized (as described in section 7401 of part 217 of the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement); (B) the parts produced by each such contractor have been qualified and certified as meeting applicable technical design and use specifications; and (C) each such contractor has reached the required rate of production to meet supply requirements for parts under the F–35 aircraft program. (2) A cost analysis, prepared by the joint program office for the F–35 aircraft program, that assesses and defines — (A) how the full integration of Block 4 and Technical Refresh 3 capabilities for each lot of Block 4 production aircraft beginning after lot 14 will affect the average procurement unit cost of United States variants of the F–35A, F–35B, and F–35C aircraft; and (B) how the establishment of alternate sources of production and sustainment supply and repair parts due to the removal of the Republic of Turkey from the F–35 program will affect such unit cost. (3) All reports required under section 167 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (4) An independent cost estimate, prepared by Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, that defines, for each phase of the F–35 aircraft program, the cost to develop, procure, integrate, and retrofit F–35 aircraft with all Block 4 capability requirements that are specified in the most recent Block 4 capabilities development document. (5) A plan to correct or mitigate any deficiency in the aircraft, identified as of the date of enactment of this Act— (A) that may cause death, severe injury or occupational illness, or major loss or damage to equipment or a system, and for which there is no identified workaround (commonly known as a category 1A deficiency (B) that critically restricts combat readiness capabilities or results in the inability to attain adequate performance to accomplish mission requirements (commonly known as a category 1B deficiency (6) A software and hardware capability, upgrade, and aircraft modification plan that defines the cost and schedule for retrofitting F–35 aircraft that currently have Technical Refresh 2 capabilities installed to ensure compatibility with Block 4 and Technical Refresh 3 aircraft capabilities. (7) The following reports for the F–35 aircraft program, as prepared by the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation: (A) A report on the results of the realistic survivability testing of the aircraft, as described in section 2366(d) of title 10, United States Code. (B) A report on the results of the initial operational test and evaluation conducted for program, as described in section 2399(b)(2) of such title. (8) A mitigation strategy and implementation plan to address each critical deficiency in the F–35 autonomic logistics information system that has been identified as of the date of enactment of this Act. (9) A certification that the F–35A meets the required mission reliability performance using an average sortie duration of 2 and one-half hours. (10) A certification that the Secretary has developed and validated a fully integrated and realistic schedule for the development, production and integration of Block 4 Technical Refresh 3 capabilities, that includes a strategy for resolving all software technical debt that has accumulated within the F–35 operational flight program source code during development, production, and integration of Technical Refresh 1 and Technical Refresh 2 capabilities. (11) (A) A complete list of hardware modifications that will be required to integrate Block 4 capabilities into lot 16 and lot 17 production aircraft. (B) An estimate of the costs of any engineering changes required as a result of such modifications. (C) A comparison of those engineering changes and costs with the engineering changes and costs for lot 15 production aircraft. 132. Notification on software regression testing for F–35 aircraft (a) Notification required The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in consultation with the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, shall notify the congressional defense committees, in writing, not later than 30 days after the date on which mission systems production software for the F–35 aircraft is released to units operating such aircraft under the F–35 continuous capability development and delivery program. (b) Elements The notification required under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to the mission systems production software for the F–35 aircraft, the following: (1) An explanation of the types and methods of regression testing that were completed for the production release of the software to ensure compatibility and proper functionality with— (A) the fire control radar system of each variant of the F–35 aircraft; and (B) all weapons certified for carriage and employment on each variant of the F–35 aircraft. (2) Identification of any entities that conducted regression testing of the software, including any development facilities of the Federal Government or contractors that conducted such testing. (3) A list of deficiencies identified during regression testing of the software or by operational units after fielding of the software, and an explanation of— (A) any software modifications, including quick-reaction capability, that were completed to resolve or mitigate the deficiencies; (B) with respect to any deficiencies that were not resolved or mitigated, whether the deficiencies will be corrected in later releases of the software; and (C) any effects resulting from such deficiencies, including— (i) any effects on the cost and schedule for delivery of the software; and (ii) in cases in which the deficiencies resulted in additional, unplanned, software releases, any effects on the ongoing testing of software capability releases. 133. Notification on efforts to replace inoperable ejection seat aircraft locator beacons (a) Notification Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and on a semi-annual basis thereafter until the date specified in subsection (b), the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall submit to the congressional defense committees a written notification that describes, with respect to the period covered by the notification— (1) the efforts of the service acquisition executives of the Department of the Air Force and the Department of the Navy to replace ejection seat aircraft locator beacons that are— (A) installed on covered aircraft; and (B) inoperable in water or in wet conditions; and (2) the funding allocated for such efforts. (b) Date specified The date specified in this subsection is the earlier of— (1) the date on which the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment determines that all ejection seat aircraft locator beacons installed on covered aircraft are operable in water and wet conditions; or (2) the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) The term covered aircraft (2) The term service acquisition executive of the Department of the Air Force Public Law 116–92 10 U.S.C. 9016 134. Limitation on use of funds for the Armed Overwatch Program None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for procurement for the Armed Overwatch Program of the United States Special Operations Command may be obligated or expended until the date on which— (1) the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that— (A) the Secretary has completed a requirements review of the Armed Overwatch Program; and (B) the Secretary has conducted a review of the roles and responsibilities of the United States Air Force and the United States Special Operations Command with respect to close air support and armed intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance and, as a result of such review, the Secretary has identified the Armed Overwatch Program as a special operations forces-peculiar requirement; and (2) the Commander of United States Special Operations Command submits to the congressional defense committees— (A) certification that the Commander or Deputy Commander has approved the documentation of the Special Operations Command Requirements Evaluation Board; and (B) a requirements plan for the Armed Overwatch program that includes— (i) an analysis of alternatives; (ii) a procurement plan over the period covered by the most recent future-years defense program submitted under section 221 of title 10, United States Code; (iii) a sustainment plan with projected costs; (iv) a phase out plan of existing armed intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance platforms; (v) a manpower and training analysis, and; (vi) doctrinal considerations for employment; and (C) a roadmap analyzing whether the near-term to mid-term multi-mission responsibilities of the Armed Overwatch Program are consistent with the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements of the various special operations forces units and missions, and the geographic combatant commands. II RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION A Authorization of Appropriations 201. Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in the funding table in section 4201. B Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations 211. Modification of Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation (SMART) Defense Education Program (a) Pilot subprogram Section 2192a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (b) through (h) as subsections (c) through (i); (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection: (b) Requirement for Pilot subprogram (1) In general As a subprogram of the program under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program to be known as the National Security Pipeline Pilot Program Pilot Program (2) Elements Under the Pilot Program, the Secretary of Defense shall— (A) provide an appropriate amount of financial assistance under subsection (c) to an individual who is pursuing an associate’s degree, undergraduate degree, or advanced degree at a minority institution; (B) provide such financial assistance to recipients in conjunction with summer internship opportunities or other meaningful temporary appointments within the Department; and (C) periodically evaluate the success of recruiting individuals for scholarships under this subsection and on hiring and retaining those individuals in the public sector workforce. (3) Reports (A) Initial report Not later than December 31, 2022, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the establishment of the Pilot Program. At a minimum, the report shall identify the number of students participating in the pilot program as of the date of the report, the fields of study pursued by such students, and the minority institutions at which such students are enrolled. (B) Final report Not later than September 30, 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that evaluates the success of the pilot program in recruiting individuals for scholarships under this section and hiring and retaining those individuals in the public sector workforce. (4) Termination The Pilot Program shall terminate on December 31, 2026. ; (3) in subsection (c)(1), as so redesignated— (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking subsection (g) subsection (h) (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking subsection (c) subsection (d) (4) in subsection (d), as so redesignated— (A) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and (B) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph: (3) Pursuant to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense for such purpose, a scholarship recipient who is not serving in the Armed Forces at the time the scholarship is received may fulfill the condition described in paragraph (1) by serving on active duty in the Armed Forces. ; and (5) by amending subsection (i), as so redesignated, to read as follows: (i) Definitions In this section: (1) The term institution of higher education 20 U.S.C. 1001 (2) The term minority institution . (b) Additional modifications Section 2192a of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), is further amended— (1) in subsection (d), by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (5) In employing participants during the period of obligated service, the Secretary shall ensure that participants are compensated at a rate that is comparable to the rate of compensation for employment in a similar position in the private sector. . (2) by redesignating subsections (e) through (i) as subsections (f) through (j), respectively; (3) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection: (e) Internship requirement In addition to the period of obligated service required under subsection (d), before completing a degree program for which a scholarship was awarded under this section, each participant shall participate in a paid internship for a period of not less than eight weeks with a defense industry sponsor. The Secretary shall work with each defense industry sponsor to ensure there are sufficient paid internships available for all participants, and that each such defense industry sponsor— (1) (A) may be a potential employer for purpose of the participant’s period of obligated service as described subsection (d)(1)(B)(ii); or (B) may offer full time employment for a participant’s last year of obligated service after the participant completes remaining years owed; and (2) has agreed to be a defense industry sponsor making a minimum contribution for each participant who receives an internship, which shall be a minimum amount determined by the Secretary, but not less than an amount equal to 50 percent of the cost of an average scholarship under this section. ; (4) in subsection (h), as so redesignated— (A) by striking The Secretary of Defense shall (1) The Secretary of Defense shall ; and (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) (A) The Secretary of Defense shall establish or designate an organization within the Department of Defense which shall have primary responsibility for building cohesion and collaboration across the various scholarship and employment programs of the Department. (B) The organization described in subparagraph (A) shall have the following duties: (i) Establish an interconnected network and database across the scholarship and employment programs of the Department, including, at a minimum the SMART Defense Education Program, the Defense Civilian Training Corps, the National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship, the Army AEOP apprenticeship program, and the Consortium Research Fellows Program; (ii) aid in matching scholarships to individuals pursuing courses of study in in-demand skill areas; and (iii) build a network of program participants, past, present, and future whom DOD departments can draw on to fill skills gaps. (C) On an annual basis, the organization described in subparagraph (A) shall publish, on a publicly accessible website of the Department of Defense, an annual report on the workforce requirements and expected future needs of the civilian workforce of the Department of Defense. ; (5) by redesignating subsection (j), as so redesignated, as subsection (k); (6) by inserting after subsection (i) the following new subsection: (j) Special rule In each year of the program under this section, not less than 20 percent of the applicants who are awarded scholarships shall be individuals pursuing degrees in computer science or a related field of study. ; and (7) in subsection (k), as so redesignated, by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) The term defense industry sponsor (A) a defense contractor with an active government contract that makes the required minimum contribution described in subsection (e)(2); or (B) a company deemed critical to the national security infrastructure that makes such a contribution. . 212. Enhanced participation of Department of Defense contractors in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics activities (a) In general (1) Program required Chapter 111 section 2192b 2192c. Program to enhance contractor participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics activities (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a program under which the Secretary shall seek to enter into partnerships with Department of Defense contractors to promote interest in careers in STEM disciplines. (b) Objectives The objectives of the program under subsection (a) are— (1) to maximize strategic partnerships between institutions of higher education and private sector organizations to build and strengthen communities involved in STEM disciplines; (2) to increase diversity, equity, and inclusion by providing access to career paths in STEM in historically underserved and underrepresented communities; and (3) to encourage employers in STEM disciplines to establish work-based learning experiences such as internships and apprenticeships. (c) Activities As part of the program under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall seek to encourage and provide support to Department of Defense contractors to enable such contractors to carry out activities to promote interest in careers in STEM disciplines. Such activities may include— (1) aiding in the development of educational programs and curriculum in STEM disciplines for students of elementary schools and secondary schools; (2) establishing volunteer programs in elementary schools and secondary schools receiving assistance under part A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 6311 (3) enhancing education in STEM disciplines at institutions of higher education by— (A) making personnel available to advise and assist faculty at such institutions in the performance of research and instruction in STEM disciplines that are determined to be critical to the functions of the Department of Defense; (B) awarding scholarships and fellowships to students pursuing courses of study in STEM disciplines; or (C) establishing cooperative work-education programs in STEM disciplines for students; or (4) enhancing education in STEM disciplines at minority institutions by— (A) establishing partnerships between offerors and such institutions for the purpose of training students in STEM disciplines; (B) conducting recruitment activities at such institutions; or (C) making internships or apprenticeships available to students of such institutions. (d) Allowability of costs Activities described in subsection (c) shall be considered as allowable community service activities for the purposes of determining allowability of cost on a government contract. (h) Definitions In this section: (1) The terms elementary school secondary school 20 U.S.C. 7801 (2) The term institution of higher education 20 U.S.C. 1001 (3) The term minority institution (A) a part B institution (as that term is defined in section 322(2) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 1061(2) (B) any other institution of higher education (as that term is defined in section 101 of such Act ( 20 U.S.C. 1001 (4) The term STEM disciplines . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2192b the following new item: 2192c. Program to enhance contractor participation in science, technology, engineering, and math activities. . (b) Conforming repeal Section 862 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ( Public Law 112–81 213. Modification of requirements relating to certain cooperative research and development agreements Section 2350a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (b)(2), by striking and the Under Secretary or the Under Secretary (2) in subsection (c)— (A) by striking Each cooperative (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), each cooperative (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (2) A cooperative research and development project may be entered into under this section under which costs are shared between the participants on an unequal basis if the Secretary of Defense, or an official specified in subsection (b)(2) to whom the Secretary delegates authority under this paragraph, makes a written determination that unequal cost sharing provides strategic value to the United States or another participant in the project. (3) For purposes of this subsection, the term cost ; (3) in subsection (d)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking In order to Except as provided in paragraph (2), in order to (B) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and (C) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph: (2) (A) The Secretary of Defense, or an official specified in subsection (b)(2) to whom the Secretary delegates authority under this paragraph, may waive the prohibition under paragraph (1) to allow the procurement of qualified services from a foreign government, foreign research organization, or other foreign entity on a case-by-case basis. (B) Not later than 30 days before issuing a waiver under subparagraph (A), the Secretary of Defense or the official specified in subsection (b)(2) to whom the Secretary delegates authority under this paragraph (as the case may be) shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate written notice of the intent to issue such a waiver. (C) For purposes of this paragraph, the term qualified services . 214. Pilot program on talent optimization Section 2358b of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (e) Pilot program on talent optimization (1) In general The Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, acting through the Director of the Defense Innovation Unit, shall carry out a pilot program to develop a software-based system that enables active duty military units to identify, access, and request support from members of the reserve components who have the skills and expertise necessary to carry out one or more functions required of such units. (2) Elements In carrying out the pilot program, the Director of the Defense Innovation Unit shall— (A) ensure that the system developed under paragraph (1)— (i) enables active duty units, in near real-time, to identify members of the reserve components who have the qualifications necessary to meet certain requirements applicable to the units; (ii) improves the ability of the military departments to access, on-demand, members of the reserve components who possess relevant experience; and (iii) prioritizes access to members of the reserve components who have private-sector experience in the fields identified in section (b); (iv) leverages commercial best practices for similar software systems; (B) recommend policies and legislation to streamline the use of members of the reserve components by active duty units; and (C) carry out such other activities as the Director determines appropriate. (3) Termination The authority to carry out the pilot program under this subsection shall terminate on September 30, 2025. . 215. Codification of the National Security Innovation Network (a) Codification (1) In general Chapter 139 section 2358b 2358c. National Security Innovation Network (a) Establishment The Secretary of Defense shall establish a program office to be known as the National Security Innovation Network Network (b) Responsibilities The responsibilities of the Network shall be— (1) to create a network throughout the United States that connects the Department of Defense to academic institutions, commercial accelerators and incubators, commercial innovation hubs, and nonprofit entities with missions relating to national security innovation; (2) to expand the national security innovation base through integrated, project-based problem solving that leads to novel concept and solution development for the Department and facilitates dual-use venture creation; (3) to accelerate the adoption of novel concepts and solutions by facilitating dual-use technology advancement to improve acquisition and procurement outcomes; (4) to work in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, other principal staff assistants within the Office of the Secretary, and the Armed Forces to create new pathways and models of national security service that facilitate term, temporary, and permanent employment within the Department for— (A) students and graduates in the fields of science, technology, arts, engineering, and mathematics; (B) early-career and mid-career technologists; and (C) entrepreneurs for purposes of project-based work; (5) to generate novel concepts and solutions to problems and requirements articulated by entities within the Department through programs, such as the Hacking for Defense program, that combine end users from the Department, students and faculty from academic institutions, and the early-stage dual-use venture community; (6) to establish physical locations throughout the United States through which the Network will connect with academic and private sector partners for the purposes of carrying the responsibilities described in paragraphs (1) through (5); and (7) to carry out such other activities as the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the head of the Network, determines to be relevant to such responsibilities. (c) Authorities In addition to the authorities provided under this section, in carrying out this section, the Secretary of Defense may use the following authorities: (1) Section 1599g of this title relating to public-private talent exchanges. (2) Section 2368 of this title, relating to Centers for Science, Technology, and Engineering Partnerships. (3) Section 2374a of this title, relating to prizes for advanced technology achievements. (3) Section 2474 of this title, relating to Centers of Industrial and Technical Excellence. (4) Section 2521 of this title, relating to the Manufacturing Technology Program. (5) Subchapter VI of chapter 33 (6) Chapter 47 of such title, relating to personnel research programs and demonstration projects. (7) Section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 ( 15 U.S.C. 3710a (8) Such other authorities as the Secretary considers appropriate. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) The term dual-use venture (2) The term early-stage dual-use venture . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2358b the following new item: 2358c. National Security Innovation Network. . (b) Implementation (1) Transfers from other DOD elements The Secretary of Defense may transfer to the National Security Innovation Network established under section 2358c of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)) such personnel, resources, and functions of other organizations and elements of the Department of Defense as the Secretary considers appropriate to carry out such section. (2) Integration with existing NSIN Effective on the date of the enactment of this Act, the National Security Innovation Network of the Department of Defense (as in existence on the day before such date of enactment) shall be transferred to and merged with the National Security Innovation Network established under section 2358c of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)). (3) Implementation plan (A) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for implementing the National Security Innovation Network under section 2358c of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)). (B) Elements The plan required under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (i) Plans for any transfers the Secretary intends to carry out under paragraph (1). (ii) Plans for the funding, integration, and evaluation of the Network, including plans for— (I) future funding and administrative support of the Network; (II) integration of the Network into the programming, planning, budgeting, and execution process of the Department of Defense; (III) integration of the Network with the other programs and initiatives within the Department that have missions relating to innovation and outreach to the academic and the private sector early-stage dual-use venture community (as defined in section 2358c of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)); and (IV) performance indicators by which the Network will be assessed and evaluated. (iii) A description of any additional authorities the Secretary may require to ensure that the Network is able to effectively carry out the responsibilities specified in section 2358c(c) of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)). (c) Comptroller General reviews and reports (1) Review and report on implementation plan Not later than 180 days after the date on which the implementation plan is submitted under subsection (b)(3), the Comptroller General of the United States shall— (A) complete a review of the implementation plan; (B) submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the review. (2) Program evaluation and report (A) In general Not later than three years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall— (i) complete an evaluation of the National Security Innovation Network under section 2358c of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)); and (ii) submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the results of the evaluation. (B) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this paragraph, the term appropriate congressional committees (i) the congressional defense committees; (ii) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; and (iii) the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives. 216. Modification of pilot program on enhanced civics education (a) In general Section 234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 10 U.S.C. 2164 (1) in subsection (e)(1)— (A) in subparagraph (H), by striking and (B) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (J) the improvement of critical thinking and media literacy among students, including the improvement of students’ abilities with respect to— (i) research and information fluency; (ii) critical thinking and problem solving skills; (iii) technology operations and concepts; (iv) information and technological literacy; (v) understanding of the importance of obtaining information from multiple media sources and evaluating sources for quality; and (vi) understanding how information on digital platforms can be altered through algorithms, editing, and augmented reality; and ; and (2) in subsection (g), by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) The term media literacy (A) access relevant and accurate information through media in a variety of forms; (B) critically analyze media content and the influences of different forms of media; (C) evaluate the comprehensiveness, relevance, credibility, authority, and accuracy of information; (D) make educated decisions based on information obtained from media and digital sources; . (b) Deadline for implementation Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall implement the pilot program under section 234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 10 U.S.C. 2164 (c) Progress report Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the efforts of Secretary to implement the pilot program under section 234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 10 U.S.C. 2164 217. Modification of joint artificial intelligence research, development, and transition activities Section 238 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 10 U.S.C. 2358 (1) in the section heading, by inserting and improvement of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (2) in subsection (a)— (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting acquire, develop (B) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows: (2) Emphasis The set of activities established under paragraph (1) shall include— (A) acquisition and development of mature artificial intelligence technology; (B) applying artificial intelligence and machine learning solutions to operational problems by directly delivering artificial intelligence capabilities to the Armed Forces and other organizations and elements of the Department; (C) accelerating the development, testing, and fielding of new artificial intelligence and artificial intelligence-enabling capabilities; and (D) coordinating and deconflicting activities involving artificial intelligence and artificial intelligence-enabled capabilities within the Department. (3) by amending subsection (b) to read as follows: (b) Responsible official The Deputy Secretary of Defense shall be the official within the Department of Defense with principal responsibility for the coordination of activities relating to the acquisition, development, and demonstration of artificial intelligence and machine learning for the Department. . (4) by redesignating subsections (c) through (g) as subsections (d) through (h), respectively; (5) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection: (c) Organization (1) Role of Joint Artificial Intelligence Center The set of activities established under subsection (a)(1) shall be established within the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center. (2) Authority of Deputy Secretary of Defense The Deputy Secretary of Defense shall exercise authority and direction over the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center. (3) Authority of director The Director of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center shall report directly to the Deputy Secretary of Defense. (4) Delegation In exercising authority and direction over the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center under subsection (a), the Deputy Secretary of Defense may delegate administrative and ancillary management duties to the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, as needed, to effectively and efficiently execute the mission of the Center. ; (6) in subsection (d), as so redesignated— (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking official designated under subsection (b) Deputy Secretary of Defense (B) in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting acquire, develop (C) in the heading of paragraph (2), by striking development acquisition, development, (D) in paragraph (2)— (i) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking To the degree practicable, the designated official The Deputy Secretary of Defense (ii) in subparagraph (A), by striking development acquisition, development, (iii) by redesignating subparagraphs (H) and (I) as subparagraphs (J) and (K), respectively; and (iv) by inserting after subparagraph (G), the following new subparagraphs: (H) develop standard data formats for the Department that— (i) aid in defining the relative maturity of datasets; and (ii) inform best practices for cost and schedule computation, data collection strategies aligned to mission outcomes, and dataset maintenance practices; (I) establish data and model usage agreements and collaborative partnership agreements for artificial intelligence product development with each organization and element of the Department, including each of the Armed Forces; ; (7) in subsection (e), as so redesignated— (A) by striking the official designated under subsection (b) the Director of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (B) by striking subsection (c) subsection (d) (C) by adding at the end the following: At a minimum, such access shall ensure that the Director has the ability to discover, access, share, and reuse data and models of the Armed Forces and other organizations and elements of the Department of Defense and to build and maintain data for the Department. (8) in subsection (f), as so redesignated— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking official designated under subsection (b) Deputy Secretary of Defense (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking designated official Deputy Secretary of defense (B) in paragraph (2), by striking designated official Deputy Secretary of Defense (9) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (i) Joint Artificial Intelligence Center defined The term Joint Artificial Intelligence Center Establishment of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center . 218. Modification of national security innovation activities and manufacturing pilot program (a) National security innovation activities Section 230 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( 10 U.S.C. 2358 (1) in subsection (a), by striking The Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering shall establish The Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, acting through the Director of the Defense Innovation Unit, shall establish (2) by redesignating subsections (e) through (h) as subsections (f) through (i), respectively; (3) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection: (e) Establishment of Advisory Board (1) In general Not earlier than the date specified in paragraph (5), but no later than 180 days after such date, the Under Secretary shall establish an advisory board within the Defense Innovation Unit to advise the Under Secretary and the Director of the Unit with respect to the establishment and prioritization of activities under such subsection (a). (2) Duties The advisory board established under paragraph (1) shall— (A) identify activities that should be prioritized for establishment under subsection (a); (B) not less frequently that semiannually, reevaluate and update such priorities; and (C) ensure continuing alignment of the activities established under subsection (a), including all elements of such activities described in subsection (b), with the overall technology strategy of the Department of Defense. (3) Membership The advisory board established under paragraph (1) shall be composed of one or more representatives from each of the following: (A) Each science and technology reinvention laboratory of the Department of Defense. (B) The primary procurement organization of each Armed Force. (C) The Defense Innovation Board. (D) Such other organizations and elements of the Department of Defense as the Under Secretary, in consultation with the Director of the Defense Innovation Unit, determines appropriate. (4) Plan Not later than 90 days before the date on which the advisory board is established under paragraph (1), the Under Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for establishing the advisory board, including a description of the expected roles, responsibilities, and membership of the advisory board. (5) Date specified The date specified in this paragraph is the date on which funds are first appropriated or otherwise made available to carry out subsection (a). ; and (4) in subsection (h), as so redesignated, by striking subsection (h) subsection (i) (b) Pilot program on defense manufacturing Section 1711 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 10 U.S.C. 2505 (1) in subsection (d), by striking the date that is four years after the date of the enactment of this Act December 31, 2026 (2) in subsection (e), by striking January 31, 2022 January 31, 2027 219. Extension of pilot program for the enhancement of the research, development, test, and evaluation centers of the Department of Defense (a) In general Section 233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 10 U.S.C. 2358 (1) in subsection (e), by striking 2022 2027 (2) in subsection (f)— (A) by amending paragraph (1) to read as follows: (1) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of the pilot program. ; and (B) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (F) With respect to any military department not participating in the pilot program, an explanation for such nonparticipation, including identification of— (i) any issues that may be preventing such participation; and (ii) any offices or other elements of the department that may be responsible for the delay in participation. . (b) Technical amendment Effective as of December 23, 2016, and as if included therein as enacted, section 233(c)(2)(C)(ii) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 10 U.S.C. 2358 Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology 220. Digital data management and analytics capability (a) Digital data management and analytics capability (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement an advanced digital data management and analytics capability to be used— (A) to digitally integrate all elements of the acquisition process of the Department of Defense; (B) to digitally record and track all relevant data generated during the research, development, testing, and evaluation of systems; and (C) to maximize the use of such data to inform— (i) the further development and improvement of such systems; and (ii) the acquisition process for such systems. (2) Requirements The capability developed under paragraph (1) shall meet the following requirements: (A) The capability will be accessible to, and useable by, individuals throughout the Department of Defense who have responsibilities relating to capability requirements, research, design, development, testing, evaluation, acquisition, management, operations, and sustainment of systems. (B) The capability will provide for the development, use, curation, and maintenance of authoritative and technically accurate digital systems— (i) to reduce the burden of reporting by officials responsible for executing programs; (ii) to ensure shared access to data within the Department; (iii) to supply data to digital engineering models for use in the defense acquisition process; (iv) to supply data to testing infrastructure and software to support automated approaches for testing, evaluation, and deployment throughout the defense acquisition process; and (v) to provide timely analyses to Department leadership. (C) The capability will be designed— (i) to improve data management processes in the research, development, acquisition, and sustainment activities of the Department; (ii) to provide decision makers in the Department with timely, high-quality, transparent, and actionable analyses for optimal development, acquisition, and sustainment decision making and execution; (iii) to facilitate productivity, discovery, access, knowledge sharing, and analysis of acquisition-related data across organizational boundaries at all levels of the Department, including through the development of acquisition documentation; and (iv) to build and improve analytical models and simulations to enhance the development, test, and use of weapon systems. (3) Software requirement (A) In general The capability developed under paragraph (1) shall include software to collect, organize, manage, make available, and analyze relevant data throughout the life cycle of defense acquisition programs, including any data needed to satisfy milestone requirements and reviews. (B) Procurement authority The software described in subparagraph (A) may be developed or procured using the authorities provided under section 800 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (4) Review In developing the capability required under paragraph (1) the Secretary of Defense shall— (A) review data content and requirements to support planning and reporting of functions and remove redundant data requests across functions. (B) based on such review, develop recommended approaches for— (i) moving supporting processes from analog to digital format, including planning and reporting processes; (ii) making new data active through digitalization; (iii) making legacy data, including data currently residing in program documentation, active through digitalization; and (iv) modernizing the storage, retrieval, and reporting capabilities for stakeholders within the Department, including research entities, Program Management Offices, analytic organizations, enterprise oversight, and decision makers. (b) Demonstration activities (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall carry out demonstration activities to test various approaches to building the capability required under subsection (a). (2) Program selection Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall assess and select not fewer than two and not more than five programs of the Department of Defense to participate in the demonstration activities under paragraph (1), including— (A) one or more acquisition data management test cases; and (B) one or more development and test modeling and simulation test cases to demonstrate the ability to collect data from tests and operations in the field, and feed the data back into models and simulations for better software development and testing. (3) Additional requirements As part of the demonstration activities under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall— (A) conduct a comparative analysis that assesses the risks and benefits of the digital management and analytics capability used in each of the programs participating in the demonstration activities relative to the Department’s traditional data collection, reporting, exposing, and analysis approaches; (B) ensure that the intellectual property strategy for each of the programs participating in the demonstration activities is best aligned to meet the goals of the program; and (C) develop a workforce and infrastructure plan to support any new policies and guidance implemented in connection with the demonstration activities, including any policies and guidance implemented after the completion of such activities. (c) Policies and guidance required Not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, based on the results of the demonstration activities carried out under subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall issue or modify policies and guidance to— (1) promote the use of digital management and analytics capabilities; and (2) address roles, responsibilities, and procedures relating to such capabilities. (d) Steering committee (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall establish a steering committee to assist the Secretary in carrying out subsections (a) through (c). (2) Membership The steering committee shall be composed of the following members or their designees: (A) The Chief Management Officer. (B) The Chief Information Officer. (C) The Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. (D) The Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. (E) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. (F) The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation. (G) The Service Acquisition Executives. (H) The Director for Force Structure, Resources, and Assessment of the Joint Staff. (I) The Director of the Defense Digital Service. (e) Independent assessments (1) Initial assessment (A) In general The Defense Innovation Board, in consultation with the Defense Digital Service, shall conduct an independent assessment to identify recommended approaches for the implementation of subsections (a) through (c). (B) Elements The assessment under subparagraph (A) shall include the following: (i) A plan for the development and implementation of the capability required under subsection (a), including a plan for any procurement that may be required as part of such development and implementation. (ii) An independent cost assessment of the total estimated cost of developing and implementing the capability. (iii) An independent estimate of the schedule for the development and implementation of the capability, including a reasonable estimate of the dates on which the capability can be expected to achieve initial operational capability and full operational capability, respectively. (iv) A recommendation identifying the office or other organization of the Department of Defense that would be most appropriate to manage and execute the capability. (C) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Defense Innovation Board, in consultation with the Defense Digital Service, shall submit to the Secretary of Defense and the congressional defense committees a report on the findings of the assessment under subparagraph (A), including the findings of the assessment with respect to each element specified in subparagraph (B). (2) Final assessment (A) In general Not later than March 15, 2022, the Defense Innovation Board and the Defense Science Board shall jointly complete an independent assessment of the progress of the Secretary in implementing subsections (a) through (c). The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Defense Innovation Board and the Defense Science Board have access to the resources, data, and information necessary to complete the assessment. (B) Information to Congress Not later than 30 days after the date on which the assessment under subparagraph (A) is completed, the Defense Innovation Board and the Defense Science Board shall jointly provide to the congressional defense committees— (i) a report summarizing the assessment; and (ii) a briefing on the findings of the assessment. (f) Report and briefing (1) Report on implementation Not later than 90 days after the date on which the report described in subsection (e)(1)(C) is submitted to the congressional defense committees, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the progress of the Secretary in implementing subsections (a) through (c). The report shall include an explanation of how the results of the demonstration activities carried out under subsection (b) will be incorporated into the policy and guidance required under subsection (c), particularly the policy and guidance of the members of the steering committee established under subsection (d). (2) Briefing on legislative recommendations Not later than October 15, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a briefing that identifies any changes to existing law that may be necessary to facilitate the implementation of subsections (a) through (c). 221. Social science, management science, and information science research activities (a) Establishment The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, shall carry out a program of research and development in social science, management science, and information science. (b) Purposes The purposes of the program required under subsection (a) are as follows: (1) To ensure that the Department of Defense has access to innovation and expertise in social science, management science, and information science to enable the Department to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the Department’s operational and management activities. (2) To coordinate all research and development within the Department in the fields of social science, management science, and information science. (3) To enhance cooperation and collaboration on research and development in the fields of social science, management science, and information science among the Department of Defense and appropriate private sector and international entities that are involved in such research and development. (4) To develop and manage a portfolio of research initiatives in fundamental and applied social science, management science, and information science that is stable, consistent, and balanced across relevant disciplines. (5) To accelerate efforts to transition and deploy technologies and concepts derived from research and development in the fields of social science, management science, and information science into the Department of Defense, and to establish policies, procedures, and standards for measuring the success of such efforts. (6) To collect, synthesize, and disseminate critical information on research and development in the fields of social science, management science, and information science. (7) To support the missions and systems of the Department by developing the fields of social science, management science, and information science, including by supporting— (A) appropriate research and innovation in such fields; and (B) the development of an industrial base in such fields, including development of the facilities, workforce, and infrastructure that comprise such industrial base. (c) Administration The Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering shall supervise the planning, management, and coordination of the program under subsection (a). (d) Activities The Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments and the heads of relevant Defense Agencies, shall— (1) prescribe a set of long-term challenges and a set of specific technical goals for the program, including— (A) optimization of analysis of national security data sets; (B) development of defense-related management innovation activities; (C) improving the operational use of social science, management science, and information science innovations by military commanders and civilian leaders; (D) improving understanding of the fundamental social, cultural, and behavioral forces that shape the strategic interests of the United States; and (E) developing a Department of Defense workforce capable of developing and leveraging innovations and best practices in the fields of social science, management science, and information science to support defense missions; (2) develop a coordinated and integrated research and investment plan for meeting near-term, mid-term, and long-term national security, defense-related, and Department management challenges that— (A) includes definitive milestones; (B) provides for achieving specific technical goals; and (C) builds upon the investments of the Department, other departments and agencies of the Federal Government, and the commercial sector in the fields of social science, management science, and information science; (3) develop plans for— (A) the development of the Department’s workforce in social science, management science, and information science; and (B) enhancing awareness of social science, management science, and information science within the Department; and (4) develop memoranda of agreement, joint funding agreements, and such other cooperative arrangements as the Under Secretary determines necessary for carrying out the program under subsection (a). (e) Guidance required (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering shall develop and issue guidance for defense-related social science, management science, and information science activities, including— (A) classification and data management plans for such activities; and (B) policies for control of personnel participating in such activities to minimize the effects of the loss of intellectual property in social science, management science, and information science considered sensitive to the Federal Government. (2) Updates Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering shall regularly update the guidance issued under paragraph (4). (f) Research centers (1) In general The Secretary of each military department may establish or designate an entity or activity under the jurisdiction of such Secretary, which may include a Department of Defense Laboratory, to serve as a research center in the fields of social science, management science, and information science. Each such research center shall engage with appropriate public sector and private sector organizations, including academic institutions, to enhance and accelerate the research, development, and deployment of social science, management science, and information science within the Department. (2) Minimum number The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that not less than one research center is established or designated under paragraph (1) by not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (g) Report (1) In general Not later than December 31, 2022, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the program. (2) Form of report The report required under paragraph (1) may be submitted in unclassified or classified form. 222. Measuring and incentivizing programming proficiency (a) In general Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall carry out the following activities: (1) Leverage existing civilian software development and software architecture certification programs to implement coding language proficiency and artificial intelligence competency tests within the Department of Defense that— (A) measure an individual’s competency in using machine learning tools, in a manner similar to the way the Defense Language Proficiency Test measures competency in foreign language skills; (B) enable the identification of members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense who have varying levels of quantified coding comprehension and skills and a propensity to learn new programming paradigms, algorithms, and data analytics; and (C) include hands-on coding demonstrations and challenges. (2) Update existing record keeping systems to track artificial intelligence and programming certification testing results in a manner that is comparable to the system used for tracking and documenting foreign language competency, and use that record keeping system to ensure that workforce coding and artificial intelligence comprehension and skills are taken into consideration when making assignments. (3) Implement a system of rewards, including appropriate incentive pay and retention incentives, for members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense who perform successfully on specific language coding proficiency and artificial intelligence competency tests and make their skills available to the Department. (b) Information sharing with other Federal agencies The Secretary of Defense shall share information on the activities carried out under subsection (a) with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Attorney General, the Director of National Intelligence, and the heads of such other organizations of the intelligence community as the Secretary determines appropriate, for purposes of— (1) making information about the coding language proficiency and artificial intelligence competency tests developed under such subsection available to other Federal national security agencies; and (2) encouraging the heads of such agencies to implement tracking and reward systems that are comparable to those implemented by the Department of Defense pursuant to such subsection. 223. Information technology modernization and security efforts (a) Modernization effort (1) Definitions In this subsection— (A) the term Assistant Secretary (B) the term covered agency (i) means any Federal entity that the Assistant Secretary determines is appropriate; and (ii) includes the Department of Defense; (C) the term Federal entity 47 U.S.C. 923(l) (D) the term Federal spectrum (E) the term infrastructure (F) the term NTIA (2) Initial interagency spectrum information technology coordination Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Assistant Secretary, in consultation with the Policy and Plans Steering Group, shall identify a process to establish goals, including parameters to measure the achievement of those goals, for the modernization of the infrastructure of covered agencies relating to managing the use of Federal spectrum by those agencies, which shall include— (A) the standardization of data inputs, modeling algorithms, modeling and simulation processes, analysis tools with respect to Federal spectrum, assumptions, and any other tool to ensure interoperability and functionality with respect to that infrastructure; (B) other potential innovative technological capabilities with respect to that infrastructure, including cloud-based databases, artificial intelligence technologies, automation, and improved modeling and simulation capabilities; (C) ways to improve the management of covered agencies’ use of Federal spectrum through that infrastructure, including by— (i) increasing the efficiency of that infrastructure; (ii) addressing validation of usage with respect to that infrastructure; (iii) increasing the accuracy of that infrastructure; (iv) validating models used by that infrastructure; and (v) monitoring and enforcing requirements that are imposed on covered agencies with respect to the use of Federal spectrum by covered agencies; (D) ways to improve the ability of covered agencies to meet mission requirements in congested environments with respect to Federal spectrum, including as part of automated adjustments to operations based on changing conditions in those environments; (E) the creation of a time-based automated mechanism— (i) to share Federal spectrum between covered agencies to collaboratively and dynamically increase access to Federal spectrum by those agencies; and (ii) that could be scaled across Federal spectrum; and (F) the collaboration between covered agencies necessary to ensure the interoperability of Federal spectrum. (3) Spectrum information technology modernization (A) In general Not later than 240 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Assistant Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that contains the plan of the NTIA to modernize and automate the infrastructure of the NTIA relating to managing the use of Federal spectrum by covered agencies so as to more efficiently manage that use. (B) Contents The report required under subparagraph (A) shall include— (i) an assessment of the current, as of the date on which the report is submitted, infrastructure of the NTIA described in that paragraph; (ii) an acquisition strategy for the modernized infrastructure of the NTIA described in that paragraph, including how that modernized infrastructure will enable covered agencies to be more efficient and effective in the use of Federal spectrum; (iii) a timeline for the implementation of the modernization efforts described in that paragraph; (iv) plans detailing how the modernized infrastructure of the NTIA described in that paragraph will— (I) enhance the security and reliability of that infrastructure so that such infrastructure satisfies the requirements of the Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002 ( Public Law 107–296 (II) improve data models and analysis tools to increase the efficiency of the spectrum use described in that paragraph; (III) enhance automation and workflows, and reduce the scope and level of manual effort, in order to— (aa) administer the management of the spectrum use described in that paragraph; and (bb) improve data quality and processing time; and (IV) improve the timeliness of spectrum analyses and requests for information, including requests submitted pursuant to section 552 of title 5, United States Code; (v) an operations and maintenance plan with respect to the modernized infrastructure of the NTIA described in that paragraph; (vi) a strategy for coordination between the covered agencies within the Policy and Plans Steering Group, which shall include— (I) a description of— (aa) those coordination efforts, as in effect on the date on which the report is submitted; and (bb) a plan for coordination of those efforts after the date on which the report is submitted, including with respect to the efforts described in paragraph (4); (II) a plan for standardizing— (aa) electromagnetic spectrum analysis tools; (bb) modeling and simulation processes and technologies; and (cc) databases to provide technical interference assessments that are usable across the Federal Government as part of a common spectrum management infrastructure for covered agencies; (III) a plan for each covered agency to implement a modernization plan described in paragraph (4)(A) that is tailored to the particular timeline of the agency; (vii) identification of manually intensive processes involved in managing Federal spectrum and proposed enhancements to those processes; (viii) metrics to evaluate the success of the modernization efforts described in that paragraph and any similar future efforts; and (ix) an estimate of the cost of the modernization efforts described in that paragraph and any future maintenance with respect to the modernized infrastructure of the NTIA described in that paragraph, including the cost of any personnel and equipment relating to that maintenance. (4) Interagency inputs (A) In general Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the head of each covered agency shall submit to the Assistant Secretary and the Policy and Plans Steering Group a report that describes the plan of the agency to modernize the infrastructure of the agency with respect to the use of Federal spectrum by the agency so that such modernized infrastructure of the agency is interoperable with the modernized infrastructure of the NTIA, as described in paragraph (3). (B) Contents Each report submitted by the head of a covered agency under subparagraph (A) shall— (i) include— (I) an assessment of the current, as of the date on which the report is submitted, management capabilities of the agency with respect to the use of frequencies that are assigned to the agency, which shall include a description of any challenges faced by the agency with respect to that management; (II) a timeline for completion of the modernization efforts described in that paragraph; and (III) a description of potential innovative technological capabilities for the management of frequencies that are assigned to the agency, as determined under paragraph (2); (IV) identification of agency-specific requirements or constraints relating to the infrastructure of the agency; (V) identification of any existing, as of the date on which the report is submitted, systems of the agency that are duplicative of the modernized infrastructure of the NTIA, as proposed under paragraph (3); and (VI) with respect to the report submitted by the Secretary of Defense— (aa) a strategy for the integration of systems or the flow of data among the Armed Forces, the military departments, the Defense Agencies and Department of Defense Field Activities, and other components of the Department of Defense; (bb) a plan for the implementation of solutions to the use of Federal spectrum by the Department of Defense involving information at multiple levels of classification; and (cc) a strategy for addressing, within the modernized infrastructure of the Department of Defense described in that paragraph, the exchange of information between the Department of Defense and the NTIA in order to accomplish required processing of all Department of Defense domestic spectrum coordination and management activities; and (ii) be submitted in an unclassified format, with a classified annex, as appropriate. (C) Notification of Congress Upon submission of the report required under subparagraph (A), the head of each covered agency shall notify Congress that the head of the covered agency has submitted the report. (5) GAO oversight The Comptroller General of the United States shall— (A) not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, conduct a review of the infrastructure of covered agencies, as that infrastructure exists on the date of enactment of this Act; (B) after all of the reports required under paragraph (4) have been submitted, conduct oversight of the implementation of the modernization plans submitted by the NTIA and covered agencies under paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; (C) not later than 1 year after the date on which the Comptroller General begins conducting oversight under subparagraph (B), and annually thereafter, submit a report regarding that oversight to— (i) with respect to the implementation of the modernization plan of the Department of Defense, the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; and (ii) with respect to the implementation of the modernization plans of all covered agencies, including the Department of Defense, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives; and (D) provide regular briefings to— (i) with respect to the application of this section to the Department of Defense, the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; and (ii) with respect to the application of this section to all covered agencies, including the Department of Defense, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives. (b) Telecommunications security program (1) Program required The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a program to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities in the telecommunications infrastructure of the Department of Defense. (2) Elements In carrying out the program under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall— (A) develop a capability to communicate clearly and authoritatively about threats by foreign adversaries; (B) conduct independent red-team security analysis of Department of Defense systems, subsystems, devices, and components including no-knowledge testing and testing with limited or full knowledge of expected functionalities; (C) verify the integrity of personnel who are tasked with design fabrication, integration, configuration, storage, test, and documentation of noncommercial 5G technology to be used by the Department of Defense; (D) verify the efficacy of the physical security measures used at Department of Defense locations where system design, fabrication, integration, configuration, storage, test, and documentation of 5G technology occurs; (E) direct the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense to use the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (commonly known as FedRAMP (F) direct the Defense Information Systems Agency and the United States Cyber Command to Develop a capability for continuous, independent monitoring of packet streams for 5G data on frequencies assigned to the Department of Defense to validate availability, confidentiality, and integrity of Department of Defense communications systems. (3) Implementation plan Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a plan for the implementation of the program under paragraph (1). (4) Report required Not later than 270 days after submitting the plan under paragraph (3), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report that includes— (A) a comprehensive assessment of the findings and conclusions of the program under paragraph (1); (B) recommendations on how to mitigate vulnerabilities in the Department of Defense telecommunications infrastructure; and (C) an explanation of how the Department of Defense plans to implement such recommendations. 224. Board of Directors for the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (a) Establishment The Secretary of Defense shall establish a Board of Directors for the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center. (b) Duties The duties of the Board of Directors shall be the following: (1) Provide strategic guidance to the Director of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center. (2) Advise the Secretary on matters relating to the development and use of artificial intelligence by the Department of Defense. (3) Evaluate and advise the Secretary on ethical matters relating to the development and use of artificial intelligence by the Department. (4) Conduct long-term and long-range studies on matters relating to artificial intelligence. (5) Evaluate and provide recommendations to the Secretary regarding the Department’s development of a robust workforce proficient in artificial intelligence. (6) Assist the Secretary in developing strategic level guidance on artificial intelligence-related hardware procurement and supply-chain matters. (7) Monitor and provide recommendations to the Secretary on computing power, usage, storage, and other technical matters relating to artificial intelligence. (c) Membership The Board of Directors shall be composed of the following members: (1) The official within the Department of Defense to whom the Director of the Joint Artificial intelligence center directly reports. (2) The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. (3) The Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. (4) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. (5) The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security. (6) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness. (7) Not more than five members from academic or private sector organizations outside the Department of Defense, who shall be appointed by the Secretary. (d) Chairperson The chairperson of the Board of Directors shall be the official described in subsection (c)(1). (e) Meetings The Board of Directors shall meet not less than once each fiscal quarter and may meet at other times at the call of the chairperson or a majority of the Board’s members. (f) Reports Not later than September 30 of each year through September 30, 2024, the Board of Directors shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that summarizes the activities of the Board over the preceding year. (g) Definitions In this section: (1) The term artificial intelligence Public Law 115–232 10 U.S.C. 2358 (2) The term Board of Directors (3) The term Joint Artificial Intelligence Center Establishment of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (4) The term Secretary 225. Directed Energy Working Group (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall establish a working group, to be known as the Directed Energy Working Group (b) Responsibilities The working group shall— (1) discuss the current and planned directed energy programs of each of the military departments; (2) make recommendations to the Secretary of Defense about establishing memoranda of understanding among the organizations and elements of the Department of Defense to coordinate directed energy activities using amounts authorized to be appropriated for research, development, test, and evaluation; (3) identify methods of quickly fielding directed energy capabilities and programs; and (4) develop a compendium on the effectiveness of directed energy weapon systems and integrate the compendium into an overall Joint Effectiveness Manual under the guidance from the Joint Technical Coordination Group for Munitions Effectiveness. (c) Head of working group The head of the working group shall be the Assistant Director of Directed Energy of the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. (d) Membership The members of the working group shall be appointed by not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, as follows: (1) One member from each military department, appointed by the Secretary of the military department concerned. (2) One member appointed by the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. (3) One member appointed by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. (4) One member appointed by the Director of the Strategic Capabilities Office of the Department of Defense. (5) One member appointed by the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. (e) Reports to Congress Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and not less frequently than once every 180 days thereafter, the working group shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the progress of each directed energy program being developed or fielded by the Department of Defense. (f) Termination The working group under this section shall terminate four years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 226. Program Executive Officer for Autonomy (a) In general Not later than February 1, 2022, the Secretary of the Navy shall designate a program executive officer for autonomy who shall be the official within the Department of the Navy with primary responsibility for the development and integration of autonomous technology into weapon systems. (b) Program executive officer defined In this section, the term program executive officer 227. Accountability measures relating to the Advanced Battle Management System (a) Independent cost estimate (1) In general The Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall— (A) review any cost estimate of the Advanced Battle Management System prepared by the Department of the Air Force; and (B) conduct an independent cost estimate of the full life-cycle cost of the Advanced Battle Management System. (2) Submittal to Congress At the same time as the budget of the President for fiscal year 2022 is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the review and independent cost estimate conducted under paragraph (1). (b) Air Force briefing requirement Section 147(g) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 Each briefing shall include a detailed explanation of any on-ramp exercise of the Advanced Battle Management System conducted during the quarter covered by the report, including an explanation of— (1) the objectives achieved by the exercise; (2) the realism of the exercise, including identification of the portions of the exercise that were scripted and unscripted and any technical workarounds or substitutes used for purposes of the exercise; (3) the interim capabilities provided to combatant commanders after the conclusion of the exercise (commonly known as leave behind (4) the total cost of the exercise and a breakdown of the costs with respect to technology, range and demonstration resources, personnel, and logistics. . (c) Reports Not later than December 20, 2020, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees the following reports on the Advanced Battle Management System: (1) Report on planned capabilities A report on the planned product line capabilities of the Advanced Battle Management System, including— (A) a description of the technologies needed to implement and achieve such product line capabilities; (B) a timeline for the technical maturation of such product line capabilities; and (C) a notional schedule for fielding such product line capabilities over the period covered by the current future-years defense program under section 221 of title 10, United States Code. (2) Report on acquisition authorities A report on the allocation of responsibilities among the individuals and entities responsible for acquisition for the Advanced Battle Management System, including an explanation of how decision-making and governance of the acquisition process is allocated among the Chief Architect Integration Office and other entities that are expected provide capabilities for the System. (3) Report on alignment with Common Mission Control Center A report, which may be submitted in classified or unclassified form, that explains how, and to what extent, the Advanced Battle Management System will be aligned and coordinated with the Common Mission Control Center of the Air Force. (d) Report on security measures At the same time as the budget of the President for fiscal year 2022 is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that describes how the Secretary plans to ensure the security of the Advanced Battle Management System, including a description of any information assurance and anti-tamper requirements for the System. (e) Advanced Battle Management System defined In this section, the term Advanced Battle Management System Public Law 116–92 228. Measures to address foreign talent programs (a) List of programs The Secretary of Defense shall develop and maintain a list of foreign talent programs that pose a threat to the national security interests of the United States, as determined by the Secretary. (b) Criteria In developing the list under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall consider— (1) the extent to which a foreign talent program— (A) poses a threat to research funded by the Department of Defense; and (B) engages in, or facilitates, cyber attacks, theft, espionage, or otherwise interferes in the affairs of the United States; and (2) any other factors the Secretary determines appropriate. (c) Information to Congress Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a copy of the list developed under subsection (a). (d) Publication in Federal Register Not later than 30 days after making the submission required under subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense shall publish the list developed under subsection (a) in the Federal Register. (e) Notice and comment period The list developed under subsection (a), and any guidance, rules, updates, or other requirements relating to such list, shall not take effect until such list, or any such guidance, rules, updates, or other requirements (as the case may be) have been— (1) published in the Federal Register; and (2) open for public comment for a period of not less than 60 days. (f) Foreign talent program defined In this section, the term foreign talent program Public Law 115–232 10 U.S.C. 2358 229. Disclosure of foreign funding sources in applications for Federal research awards (a) Disclosure requirement Each Federal research agency shall require— (1) any individual applying for funds from that agency as a principal investigator or co-principal investigator under a grant or cooperative agreement to disclose all current and pending support and the sources of such support at the time of the application for funds; and (2) any institution of higher education applying for funds from that agency to certify that every principal investigator or co-principal investigator who is employed by the institution of higher education and is applying for such funds has been made aware of the requirement under paragraph (1). (b) Consistency The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, acting through the National Science and Technology Council and in accordance with the authority provided under section 1746 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 42 U.S.C. 6601 (c) Enforcement (1) In general In the event that an individual or entity violates the disclosure requirements under subsection (a), a Federal research agency may take one or more of the following actions against such individual or entity: (A) Reject an application for a grant or cooperative agreement because the disclosed current and pending support violates agency terms and conditions. (B) Reject an application for a grant or cooperative agreement because current and pending support have not been disclosed as required under subsection (a). (C) Temporarily or permanently discontinue any or all funding from that agency for any principal investigator or co-principal investigator who has failed to properly disclose current and pending support pursuant to subsection (a). (D) Temporarily or permanently suspend or debar a researcher, in accordance with part 180 of title 2, Code of Federal Regulations, from receiving funding from that agency when failure to disclose current and pending support pursuant to subsection (a) as done knowingly and willfully. (E) Refer a failure to disclose under subsection (a) to Federal law enforcement authorities to determine whether any criminal statutes have been violated. (2) Notice A Federal research agency intending to take action under any of subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), or (D) of paragraph (1) shall notify the institution of higher education, principal investigator and any co-principal investigators subject to such action about the specific reason for the action, and shall provide the institution, principal investigator, and co-principal investigator, as applicable, with the opportunity and a process by which to contest the proposed action. (3) Evidentiary standards A Federal research agency seeking suspension or debarment under paragraph (1)(D) shall abide by the procedures and evidentiary standards set forth in part 180 of title 2, Code of Federal Regulations. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) Current and pending support The term current and pending support (2) Institution of Higher Education The term institution of higher education 20 U.S.C. 1001 (3) Federal research agency The term Federal research agency (A) The Department of Agriculture. (B) The Department of Commerce. (C) The Department of Defense. (D) The Department of Education. (E) The Department of Energy. (F) The Department of Health and Human Services. (G) The Department of Homeland Security. (H) The Department of Transportation. (I) The Environmental Protection Agency. (J) The National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (K) The National Science Foundation. 230. Limitations relating to large unmanned surface vessels and associated offensive weapon systems (a) Limitation on availability of funds for LUSV (1) Limitation None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for the Department of the Navy for the procurement of a large unmanned surface vessel may be obligated or expended until a period of 60 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Navy submits to the congressional defense committees the certification described in paragraph (2). (2) Certification described The certification described in this paragraph is a written statement of the Secretary of the Navy certifying, with respect to any large unmanned surface vessel to be procured by the Secretary, the following: (A) A hull system, a mechanical system, and an electrical system have been developed for the vessel and each system— (i) has attained a technology readiness level of seven or greater; and (ii) can be operated autonomously for a minimum of 30 days. (B) A command control system has been developed for the vessel and the system— (i) can be operated autonomously; (ii) includes autonomous detection; and (iii) has attained a technology readiness level of seven or greater. (C) A detailed plan has been developed for measuring and demonstrating the reliability of the vessel. (D) All payloads expected to be carried on the vessel have attained a technology readiness level of seven or greater. (b) Limitation on LUSV weapon integration The Secretary of the Navy may not integrate any offensive weapon system into a large unmanned surface vessel until the date on which the Secretary of the Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that any large unmanned surface vessel that employs offensive weapons will comply with the law of armed conflict. Such certification shall include a detailed explanation of how such compliance will be achieved. 231. Limitation on availability of funds pending review and report on next generation air dominance capabilities (a) Limitation on Air Force funds Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for the next generation air dominance initiative of the Air Force, not more than 85 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation submits the report required under subsection (d)(1). (b) Limitation on Navy funds Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for the next generation air dominance initiative of the Navy, not more than 85 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation submits the report required under subsection (d)(2). (c) Reviews (1) In general The Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall conduct— (A) a non-advocate review of the next generation air dominance initiative of the Air Force; and (B) a non-advocate review of the next generation air dominance initiative of the Navy. (2) Elements Each review under paragraph (1) shall include an assessment of— (A) all risks associated with cost, schedule, development, integration, production, fielding, and sustainment of next generation air dominance capabilities; (B) the technological maturity of significant hardware and software efforts planned or carried out as part of the development of such capabilities; and (C) affordability goals that the Air Force and the Navy (as the case may be) will be required to achieve during development, production, and sustainment activities for such capabilities that will not jeopardize or otherwise be detrimental to other high-priority future capabilities being developed and procured to support and execute other primary core competencies and missions. (d) Reports The Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall submit to the congressional defense committees— (1) a report on the results of the review conducted under subsection (c)(1)(A) with respect to the Air Force; and (2) a report on the results of the review conducted under subsection (c)(1)(B) with respect to the Navy. C Emerging Technology and Artificial Intelligence Matters 241. Steering committee on emerging technology (a) Establishment There is established in the executive branch a steering committee on emerging technology and national security threats (referred to in this section as the Steering Committee (b) Membership The Steering Committee shall be composed of the following: (1) The Deputy Secretary of Defense. (2) The Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (3) The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security. (4) Such other officials of the Department of Defense as are jointly appointed to Steering Committee by the officials specified in paragraphs (1) through (3). (c) Co-chairs The officials specified in paragraphs (1) through (3) of subsection (b) shall serve as co-chairs of the Steering Committee. (d) Staff and support services Upon request of the co-chairs, the Department of Defense shall provide to the Steering Committee, on a reimbursable basis, such staff and administrative support services as are necessary for the Committee to carry out its responsibilities under this section. (e) Responsibilities The Steering Committee shall be responsible for— (1) developing a strategic vision for the organizational change, concept and capability development, and technology investments in emerging technologies that are needed to maintain the technological edge of the military and intelligence community of the United States; (2) providing credible assessments of emerging threats and identifying investments and advances in emerging technology undertaken by adversaries of the United States; (3) making recommendations to the Secretary of Defense on— (A) the implementation of the strategy developed under to paragraph (1); and (B) steps that may be taken to address the threats identified under to paragraph (2); (4) coordinating with the Joint Committee on Research Environments of the National Science and Technology Council; and (5) carrying out such other activities as are assigned to the Steering Committee by the Secretary of Defense. (f) Coordination with JAIC The co-chairs shall coordinate the activities of the Steering Committee with the activities of the Board of Directors of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center established under section 224, as appropriate. (g) Emerging technology defined In this section, the term emerging technology big data analytics 242. Training for human resources personnel in artificial intelligence and related topics (a) Department of defense (1) Training program Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement a program to provide covered human resources personnel with training in the fields of software development, data science, and artificial intelligence, as such fields related to the duties of such personnel. (2) Elements The training provided under paragraph (1) shall include— (A) a generalist’s introduction to— (i) software development and business processes; (ii) data management practices related to machine learning; (iii) machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence; (iv) artificial intelligence workforce roles; and (v) cybersecurity and secure software development; and (B) training in the authorities and procedures that may be used to recruit software developers, data scientists, and artificial intelligence professionals, including direct hiring authorities, excepted service authorities, the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 ( 42 U.S.C. 4701 (3) Certificate of completion The Secretary of Defense shall issue a certificate of completion to each individual who successfully completes the training provided under paragraph (1), as determined by the Secretary. (4) Implementation The Secretary of Defense shall implement the training program under paragraph (1) as follows: (A) In the first year in which the training program is carried out, the Secretary shall ensure that not less than 20 percent of covered human resource personnel complete the program. (B) In each year of the training program after the first year, the Secretary shall ensure that not less than an additional 10 percent of covered human resources personnel complete the program until 80 percent of such personnel have completed the program. (C) After achieving the 80 percent completion rate specified in subparagraph (B), the Secretary shall ensure, in each year, that not less than 80 percent of covered human resources personnel have completed the training program. (b) Covered human resources personnel defined In this section, the term covered human resources personnel 243. Unclassified workspaces for personnel with pending security clearances (a) Guidance required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue guidance to ensure, to the extent practicable, that all facilities the Department of Defense at which covered personnel perform work functions have unclassified workspaces. (b) Use of workspaces by other personnel The guidance issued under subsection (a) shall include guidelines under which appropriately screened individuals other than covered personnel, such as interns and visiting experts, may use unclassified workspaces on a space-available basis. (c) Report required Not later than 90 days after the issuance of the guidance under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes— (1) a plan for implementing the guidance; (2) a description of how existing facilities may be modified to accommodate unclassified workspaces; and (3) identification of any impediments to making unclassified workspace available as described in subsection (a). (d) Definitions (1) In this section, the term unclassified workspace (2) The term covered personnel 244. Pilot program on the use of electronic portfolios to evaluate applicants for certain technical positions (a) Pilot program Beginning not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program under which applicants for technical positions within the Department of Defense will be evaluated, in part, based on electronic portfolios of the applicant’s work, as described in subsection (b). (b) Activities Under the pilot program, the human resources manager of an organization of the Department of Defense participating in the program, in consultation with relevant subject matter experts, shall assess each applicant for a technical position in the organization by reviewing an electronic portfolio of the applicant’s best work, as selected by the applicant. (c) Scope of program The Secretary of Defense shall carry out the pilot program under subsection (a) in at least one major command of each military department. (d) Report Not later than two years after the commencement of the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the program. At a minimum, the report shall describe— (1) how the use of electronic portfolios in the hiring process affected the timeliness of the hiring process for technical positions in organizations of the Department of Defense participating in the program; (2) the level of satisfaction of organization leaders, hiring authorities, and subject matter experts with the quality of applicants that were hired based on evaluations of electronic portfolios. (e) Technical position defined In this section, the term technical position (f) Termination The authority to carry out the pilot program under subsection (a) shall terminate five years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 245. Self-directed training in artificial intelligence (a) Online artificial intelligence courses The Secretary of Defense shall make available a list of approved online courses relating to artificial intelligence that may be taken by civilian employees of the Department of Defense and members of the Armed Forces on a voluntary basis while not engaged in the performance of their duties. (b) Documentation of completion The Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement a system— (1) to confirm whether a civilian employee of the Department of Defense or member of the Armed Forces has completed an online course approved by the Secretary under paragraph (1); and (2) to document the completion of such course in the personnel file of such employee or member. (c) Reward system The Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement a system to reward civilian employees of the Department of Defense and members of the Armed Forces who complete an online course approved by the Secretary under paragraph (1), which may include— (1) for a member of the Armed Forces, a 24-hour pass which may be used on a stand-alone basis or in conjunction with other leave, holiday, or weekend periods; and (2) for a civilian employees of the Department, up to 8 hours of additional leave. (d) Deadline The Secretary of Defense shall carry out the activities described in subparagraphs (a) through (c) not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 246. Part-time and term employment of university professors and students in the Defense science and technology enterprise (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, jointly with the Secretaries of the military departments, and in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall establish a program under which qualified professors and students may be employed on a part-time or term basis in an organization of the Defense science and technology enterprise for the purpose of conducting a research project. (b) Selection (1) Selection and hiring The head of an organization in the Defense science and technology enterprise at which positions are made available under subsection (a) shall be responsible for selecting qualified professors and students to fill such positions. (2) Selection criteria A qualified professor or student shall be selected for participation in the program under subsection (a) based on the following criteria: (A) In the case of a qualified professor— (i) the academic credentials and research experience of the professor; and (ii) the extent to which the research proposed to be carried out by the professor will contribute to the objectives of the Department of Defense. (B) In the case of qualified student assisting a professor with a research project under the program— (i) the academic credentials and other qualifications of the student; and (ii) the ability of the student to carry out the responsibilities assigned to the student as part of the project. (c) Implementation (1) Minimum number of positions In the first year of the program under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall establish not fewer than 10 positions for qualified professors. Not fewer than five of such positions shall be reserved for qualified professors to conduct research in the fields of artificial intelligence and machine learning. (2) Authorities In carrying out the program under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense and the heads of organizations in the Defense science and technology enterprise may— (A) use any hiring authority available to the Secretary or the head of such an organization; (B) enter into cooperative research and development agreements under section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 ( 15 U.S.C. 3710a (C) pay referral bonuses to professors or students participating in the program who identify— (i) students to assist in a research project under the program; or (ii) students or recent graduates to participate in other programs in the Defense science and technology enterprise, including internships at Department of Defense Laboratories and in the Pathways Program of the Department. (d) Reports to Congress (1) Initial report Not later than 30 days after the conclusion of the first year of the program under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of the program. The report shall include— (A) identification of the number of qualified professors and students employed under the program; (B) identification of the organizations in the Defense science and technology enterprise that employed such individuals; and (C) a description of the types of research conducted by such individuals. (2) Subsequent reports Not later than 30 days after the conclusion of the second and third years of the program under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the progress of the program. Each report shall include— (A) the information described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of paragraph (1); (B) the results of any research projects conducted under the program; and (C) the number of students and recent graduates who, pursuant to a reference from a professor or student participating in the program as described in subsection (c)(2)(C), were hired by the Department of Defense or selected for participation in another program in the Defense science and technology enterprise. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term Defense science and technology enterprise (A) the research organizations of the military departments; (B) the science and technology reinvention laboratories (as designated under section 1105 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( Public Law 111–84 10 U.S.C. 2358 (C) the facilities of the Major Range and Test Facility Base (as defined in section 2358a(f)(3) of title 10, United States Code); (D) the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; and (E) such other organizations as the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate for inclusion in the enterprise. (2) The term institution of higher education 20 U.S.C. 1001 (3) The term qualified professor (4) The term qualified student 247. Microelectronics and national security (a) Modification of strategy for assured access to trusted microelectronics Section 231 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 10 U.S.C. 2302 (1) in subsection (a), by striking September 30, 2019 December 30, 2020 (2) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (10) An approach to ensuring the continuing production of cutting-edge microelectronics for national security needs, including state-of-the-art node sizes, heterogeneous integration, boutique chip designs, and variable volume production capabilities. (11) An assessment of current microelectronics supply chain management practices, existing risks, and actions that may be carried out to mitigate such risks by organizations in the defense industrial base. (12) A plan for increasing commercialization of intellectual property developed by the Department of Defense for commercial microelectronics research and development. (13) An assessment of the feasibility, usefulness, efficacy, and cost of— (A) developing a national laboratory exclusively focused on the research and development of microelectronics to serve as a center for Federal Government expertise in high-performing, trusted microelectronics and as a hub for Federal Government research into breakthrough microelectronics-related technologies; and (B) incorporating into such national laboratory a commercial incubator to provide early-stage microelectronics startups, which face difficulties scaling due to the high costs of microelectronics design and fabrication, with access to funding resources, fabrication facilities, design tools, and shared intellectual property. (14) Such other matters as the Secretary of Defense determines to be relevant. ; (3) in subsection (d), by striking September 30, 2019 December 30, 2020 (4) in subsection (e), by striking September 30, 2019 December 30, 2020 (b) Advisory panel on microelectronics leadership and competitiveness (1) Establishment Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President, in consultation with the National Security Council, the National Economic Council, and the Office of Science and Technology Policy, shall establish an advisory panel on microelectronics leadership and competitiveness (referred to in this subsection as the Advisory Panel (2) Membership The Advisory Panel shall be composed of the following members: (A) The Secretary of Defense. (B) The Secretary of Energy. (C) The Director of the National Science Foundation. (D) The Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. (E) The heads of such other departments and agencies of the Federal Government as the President, in consultation with the National Security Council, determines appropriate. (3) National strategy (A) In general Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Advisory Panel is established, the Panel shall develop a national strategy to— (i) accelerate the development and deployment of state-of-the-art microelectronics; and (ii) ensure that the United States is a global leader in the field of microelectronics. (B) Elements The strategy developed under subparagraph (A) shall address the following: (i) Activities that may be carried out to strengthen engagement and outreach between the Department of Defense and industry, academia, international partners of the United States, and other departments and agencies of the Federal Government on issues relating to microelectronics. (ii) Science, technology, research, and development efforts to facilitate the advancement and adoption of microelectronics and new uses of microelectronics and components, including efforts to— (I) accelerate leap-ahead research, development, and innovation in microelectronics; and (II) deploy heterogeneously integrated microelectronics for machine learning and other applications. (iii) The role of diplomacy and trade in maintaining the position of the United States as a global leader in the field of microelectronics, including the feasibility and advisability of— (I) implementing multilateral export controls tailored through direct coordination with key allies of the United States, including through the Wassenaar Arrangement and other multilateral fora, for specific semiconductor manufacturing equipment such as extreme ultraviolet photolithography equipment and argon fluoride immersion photolithography equipment; (II) additional trade enforcement actions that may be initiated by the United States to address any unfair or excessive foreign semiconductor subsidy programs or other unfair microelectronics trade practices; and (III) the elimination of any trade barriers or unilateral export controls that harm United States companies without producing a substantial benefit to the competitiveness or national security of the United States. (iv) The potential role of a national laboratory and incubator exclusively focused on the research and development of microelectronics, as described in section 231(b)(13) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 10 U.S.C. 2302 (v) Such other activities as the Panel determines may be appropriate to overcome looming challenges to the innovation, competitiveness, and supply chain integrity of the United States in the area of microelectonics. (c) Briefings Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act— (1) the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the progress of the Secretary in developing the strategy and implementation plan required under section 231(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 10 U.S.C. 2302 (2) the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the progress of the Advisory Panel in developing the strategy required under subsection (b)(3). 248. Acquisition of ethically and responsibly developed artificial intelligence technology (a) Assessment required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Board of Directors of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center established under section 224, shall conduct an assessment to determine whether the Department of Defense has the ability to ensure that any artificial intelligence technology acquired by the Department is ethically and responsibly developed. (b) Elements The assessment conducted under paragraph (1) shall address the following: (1) Whether the Department of Defense has personnel with sufficient expertise, across multiple disciplines, to ensure the acquisition of ethically and responsibly developed artificial intelligence technology, including personnel with sufficient ethical, legal, and technical expertise to advise on the acquisition of such technology. (2) The feasibility and advisability of retaining outside experts as consultants to assist the Department in filling any gaps in expertise identified under paragraph (1). (3) The extent to which existing acquisition processes encourage or require consultation with relevant experts across multiple disciplines within the Department to ensure that artificial intelligence technology acquired by the Department is ethically and responsibly developed. (4) Quantitative and qualitative standards for assessing the extent to which experts across multiple disciplines are engaged in the acquisition of artificial intelligence technology by the Department. (c) Report (1) In general Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary completes the assessment under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the assessment. (2) Elements The report under paragraph (1) shall include, based on the results of the assessment— (A) an explanation of whether the Department of Defense has personnel with sufficient expertise, across multiple disciplines, to ensure the acquisition of ethically and responsibly developed artificial intelligence technology; (B) an explanation of whether the Department has adequate procedures to encourage or require the consultation of such experts as part of the acquisition process for artificial intelligence technology; and (C) with respect to any deficiencies identified under subparagraph (A) or subparagraph (B), a description of any measures that have been taken, and any additional resources that may be needed, to mitigate such deficiencies. 249. Enhancement of public-private talent exchange programs in the Department of Defense (a) Public-private talent exchange.-- Section 1599g of title 10, United States Code is amended— (1) in subsection (b)(1), by amending subparagraph (C) to read as follows: (C) shall contain language ensuring that such employee of the Department does not improperly use information that such employee knows relates to a Department acquisition, or procurement for the benefit or advantage of the private-sector organization. . (2) in subsection (f)— (A) in paragraph (2)— (i) by striking is deemed to be an employee of the Department of Defense for the purposes of is subject to (ii) by striking subparagraph (D); (iii) by redesignating subparagraphs (E) and (F) as subparagraphs (D) and (E), respectively; (B) by striking paragraph (4); (C) by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (4); and (D) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (5) shall be required to file a Public Financial Disclosure Report (OGE Form 278) and the Public Financial Disclosure Report for a such a person and a description of any waivers provided to such person shall be made available on a publicly accessible website of the Department of Defense. . (b) Application of exchange authority to artificial intelligence Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall take steps to ensure that the authority for the Department of Defense to operate a public-private talent exchange program pursuant to section 1599g of title 10, United States Code, is used to exchange personnel with private sector entities working on artificial intelligence applications. Such application of the authority of section 1599g shall be in addition to, not in lieu of, any other application of such authority by the Department of Defense. (c) Goals for program participation In carrying out the requirement of subsection (b), the Secretary shall seek to achieve the following objectives: (1) In the Secretary of Defense Executive Fellows program, the nomination of an additional five uniformed service members and three government civilians by each service and by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, for sponsorship by private sector entities working on artificial intelligence applications. (2) For the public-private talent exchange program of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment— (A) an additional ten government employees to work with private sector entities working on artificial intelligence applications; and (B) an additional ten employees of private sector entities working on artificial intelligence applications to work in the Department. (3) The establishment of the following new public-private talent exchange programs in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, comparable to the program referred to in paragraph (2)— (A) in the office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, a program with twenty participants, focused on exchanges with private sector entities working on artificial intelligence applications. (B) in the office of the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, a program with twenty participants, focused on exchanges with private sector entities working on artificial intelligence applications. (4) In the Army, Navy, and Marine Corps, the establishment of new public-private exchange programs, comparable to the Air Force Education with Industry Program, each with twenty program participants, focused on private sector entities working on artificial intelligence applications. (d) Treatment of program participants (1) The Army, Navy, and Marine Corps shall take steps to ensure that participation by a service member in a program described in subsection (c)(4) is treated, for purposes of promotion boards and subsequent assignments, as equivalent to attending resident professional military education. (2) The Secretary of Defense shall establish a public-private exchange program billet office to temporarily hold billets for civilian employees who participate in programs described in subsection (b), to ensure that participating Department of Defense offices are able to retain their staffing levels during the period of participation. (e) Briefing on expansion of existing exchange programs Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a briefing on the efforts undertaken to expand existing public-private exchange programs of the Department of Defense and to ensure that such programs seek opportunities for exchanges with private sector entities working on artificial intelligence applications, in accordance with the requirements of this section. D Sustainable Chemistry Research and Development 251. Short title This subtitle may be cited as the Sustainable Chemistry Research and Development Act of 2020 252. Findings Congress finds that— (1) Congress recognized the importance and value of sustainable chemistry in section 114 of the American Innovation and Competitiveness Act ( Public Law 114–329 (2) sustainable chemistry and materials transformation is a key value contributor to business competitiveness across many industrial and consumer sectors; (3) companies across hundreds of supply chains critical to the American economy are seeking to reduce costs and open new markets through innovations in manufacturing and materials, and are in need of new innovations in chemistry, including sustainable chemistry; (4) sustainable chemistry can improve the efficiency with which natural resources are used to meet human needs for chemical products while avoiding environmental harm, reduce or eliminate the emissions of and exposures to hazardous substances, minimize the use of resources, and benefit the economy, people, and the environment; and (5) a recent report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO–18–307) found that the Federal Government could play an important role in helping realize the full innovation and market potential of sustainable chemistry technologies, including through a coordinated national effort on sustainable chemistry and standardized tools and definitions to support sustainable chemistry research, development, demonstration, and commercialization. 253. National coordinating entity for sustainable chemistry (a) Establishment Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall convene an interagency entity (referred to in this subtitle as the Entity (b) Coordination with existing groups In convening the Entity, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall consider overlap and possible coordination with existing committees, subcommittees, or other groups of the National Science and Technology Council, such as— (1) the Committee on Environment; (2) the Committee on Technology; (3) the Committee on Science; or (4) related groups or subcommittees. (c) Co-chairs The Entity shall be co-chaired by the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy and a representative from the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the National Science Foundation, or the Department of Energy, as selected by the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy. (d) Agency participation The Entity shall include representatives, including subject matter experts, from the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Defense, the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration, and other related Federal agencies, as appropriate. (e) Termination The Entity shall terminate on the date that is 10 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 254. Strategic plan for sustainable chemistry (a) Strategic plan Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Entity shall— (1) consult with relevant stakeholders, including representatives from industry, academia, national labs, the Federal Government, and international entities, to develop and update, as needed, a consensus definition of sustainable chemistry (2) develop a working framework of attributes characterizing and metrics for assessing sustainable chemistry, as described in subsection (b); (3) assess the state of sustainable chemistry in the United States as a key benchmark from which progress under the activities described in this subtitle can be measured, including assessing key sectors of the United States economy, key technology platforms, commercial priorities, and barriers to innovation; (4) coordinate and support Federal research, development, demonstration, technology transfer, commercialization, education, and training efforts in sustainable chemistry, including budget coordination and support for public-private partnerships, as appropriate; (5) identify any Federal regulatory barriers to, and opportunities for, Federal agencies facilitating the development of incentives for development, consideration, and use of sustainable chemistry processes and products; (6) identify major scientific challenges, roadblocks, or hurdles to transformational progress in improving the sustainability of the chemical sciences; (7) identify other opportunities for expanding Federal efforts in support of sustainable chemistry; and (8) review, identify, and make efforts to eliminate duplicative Federal funding and duplicative Federal research in sustainable chemistry. (b) Characterizing and assessing sustainable chemistry The Entity shall develop a working framework of attributes characterizing and metrics for assessing sustainable chemistry for the purposes of carrying out the Act. In developing this framework, the Entity shall— (1) seek advice and input from stakeholders as described in subsection (c); (2) consider existing definitions of, or frameworks characterizing and metrics for assessing, sustainable chemistry already in use at Federal agencies; (3) consider existing definitions of, or frameworks characterizing and metrics for assessing, sustainable chemistry already in use by international organizations of which the United States is a member, such as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; and (4) consider any other appropriate existing definitions of, or frameworks characterizing and metrics for assessing, sustainable chemistry. (c) Consultation In carrying out the duties described in subsections (a) and (b), the Entity shall consult with stakeholders qualified to provide advice and information to guide Federal activities related to sustainable chemistry through workshops, requests for information, or other mechanisms as necessary. The stakeholders shall include representatives from— (1) business and industry (including trade associations and small- and medium-sized enterprises from across the value chain); (2) the scientific community (including the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, scientific professional societies, national labs, and academia); (3) the defense community; (4) State, Tribal, and local governments, including nonregulatory State or regional sustainable chemistry programs, as appropriate; (5) nongovernmental organizations; and (6) other appropriate organizations. (d) Report to congress (1) In general Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this subtitle, the Entity shall submit a report to the Committee on Environment and Public Works, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate, and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. In addition to the elements described in subsections (a) and (b), the report shall include— (A) a summary of federally funded, sustainable chemistry research, development, demonstration, technology transfer, commercialization, education, and training activities; (B) a summary of the financial resources allocated to sustainable chemistry initiatives by each participating agency; (C) an assessment of the current state of sustainable chemistry in the United States, including the role that Federal agencies are playing in supporting it; (D) an analysis of the progress made toward achieving the goals and priorities of this subtitle, and recommendations for future program activities; (E) an evaluation of steps taken and future strategies to avoid duplication of efforts, streamline interagency coordination, facilitate information sharing, and spread best practices among participating agencies; and (F) an evaluation of duplicative Federal funding and duplicative Federal research in sustainable chemistry, efforts undertaken by the Entity to eliminate duplicative funding and research, and recommendations on how to achieve these goals. (2) Submission to gao The Entity shall also submit the report described in paragraph (1) to the Comptroller General of the United States for consideration in future Congressional inquiries. (3) Additional reports The Entity shall submit a report to Congress and the Comptroller General of the United States that incorporates the information described in subparagraphs (a), (b), (d), (e), and (f) every three years, commencing after the initial report is submitted until the Entity terminates. 255. Agency activities in support of sustainable chemistry (a) In general The agencies participating in the Entity shall carry out activities in support of sustainable chemistry, as appropriate to the specific mission and programs of each agency. (b) Activities The activities described in subsection (a) shall— (1) incorporate sustainable chemistry into existing research, development, demonstration, technology transfer, commercialization, education, and training programs, that the agency determines to be relevant, including consideration of— (A) merit-based competitive grants to individual investigators and teams of investigators, including, to the extent practicable, early career investigators for research and development; (B) grants to fund collaborative research and development partnerships among universities, industry, and nonprofit organizations; (C) coordination of sustainable chemistry research, development, demonstration, and technology transfer conducted at Federal laboratories and agencies; (D) incentive prize competitions and challenges in coordination with such existing Federal agency programs; and (E) grants, loans, and loan guarantees to aid in the technology transfer and commercialization of sustainable chemicals, materials, processes, and products; (2) collect and disseminate information on sustainable chemistry research, development, technology transfer, and commercialization, including information on accomplishments and best practices; (3) expand the education and training of students at appropriate levels of education, professional scientists and engineers, and other professionals involved in all aspects of sustainable chemistry and engineering appropriate to that level of education and training, including through— (A) partnerships with industry as described in section 256; (B) support for the integration of sustainable chemistry principles into chemistry and chemical engineering curriculum and research training, as appropriate to that level of education and training; and (C) support for integration of sustainable chemistry principles into existing or new professional development opportunities for professionals including teachers, faculty, and individuals involved in laboratory research (product development, materials specification and testing, life cycle analysis, and management); (4) as relevant to an agency’s programs, examine methods by which the Federal agencies, in collaboration and consultation with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, may facilitate the development or recognition of validated, standardized tools for performing sustainability assessments of chemistry processes or products; (5) through programs identified by an agency, support (including through technical assistance, participation, financial support, communications tools, awards, or other forms of support) outreach and dissemination of sustainable chemistry advances such as non-Federal symposia, forums, conferences, and publications in collaboration with, as appropriate, industry, academia, scientific and professional societies, and other relevant groups; (6) provide for public input and outreach to be integrated into the activities described in this section by the convening of public discussions, through mechanisms such as public meetings, consensus conferences, and educational events, as appropriate; (7) within each agency, develop or adapt metrics to track the outputs and outcomes of the programs supported by that agency; and (8) incentivize or recognize actions that advance sustainable chemistry products, processes, or initiatives, including through the establishment of a nationally recognized awards program through the Environmental Protection Agency to identify, publicize, and celebrate innovations in sustainable chemistry and chemical technologies. (d) Limitations Financial support provided under this section shall— (1) be available only for pre-competitive activities; and (2) not be used to promote the sale of a specific product, process, or technology, or to disparage a specific product, process, or technology. 256. Partnerships in sustainable chemistry (a) In general The agencies participating in the Entity may facilitate and support, through financial, technical, or other assistance, the creation of partnerships between institutions of higher education, nongovernmental organizations, consortia, or companies across the value chain in the chemical industry, including small- and medium-sized enterprises, to— (1) create collaborative sustainable chemistry research, development, demonstration, technology transfer, and commercialization programs; and (2) train students and retrain professional scientists, engineers, and others involved in materials specification on the use of sustainable chemistry concepts and strategies by methods, including— (A) developing or recognizing curricular materials and courses for undergraduate and graduate levels and for the professional development of scientists, engineers, and others involved in materials specification; and (B) publicizing the availability of professional development courses in sustainable chemistry and recruiting professionals to pursue such courses. (b) Private sector participation To be eligible for support under this section, a partnership in sustainable chemistry shall include at least one private sector organization. (c) Selection of partnerships In selecting partnerships for support under this section, the agencies participating in the Entity shall also consider the extent to which the applicants are willing and able to demonstrate evidence of support for, and commitment to, the goals outlined in the strategic plan and report described in section 254. (d) Prohibited use of funds Financial support provided under this section may not be used— (1) to support or expand a regulatory chemical management program at an implementing agency under a State law; (2) to construct or renovate a building or structure; or (3) to promote the sale of a specific product, process, or technology, or to disparage a specific product, process, or technology. 257. Prioritization In carrying out this subtitle, the Entity shall focus its support for sustainable chemistry activities on those that achieve, to the highest extent practicable, the goals outlined in the Act. 258. Rule of construction Nothing in this subtitle shall be construed to alter or amend any State law or action with regard to sustainable chemistry, as defined by the State. 259. Major multi-user research facility project Section 110 of the American Innovation and Competitiveness Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1862s-2 (2) Major multi-user research facility project The term major multi-user research facility project . E Plans, Reports, and Other Matters 261. Modification to annual report of the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation Section 139(h)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking Engineering,, Engineering, (2) by striking , through January 31, 2025 262. Repeal of quarterly updates on the Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle program Section 261 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public law 116–92; 133 Stat. 1294) is repealed. 263. Independent evaluation of personal protective and diagnostic testing equipment (a) Independent evaluation required The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall conduct an independent evaluation of— (1) any processes used to test the effectiveness of covered personal protective and diagnostic testing equipment; and (2) the results of such tests. (b) Availability of information The Secretary of Defense shall provide the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation with such information as may be necessary for the Director to conduct the evaluations required under subsection (a), including any relevant documentation relating to testing processes and test results for covered personal protective and diagnostic testing equipment. (c) Report to Congress Not later than 30 days after the completion of each evaluation under subsection (a), the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the evaluation. (d) Covered personal protective and diagnostic testing equipment defined In this section, the term covered personal protective and diagnostic testing equipment (1) in response to COVID–19; or (2) as part of any follow-on, long-term acquisition and distribution program for such equipment. 264. Reports on F–35 physiological episodes and mitigation efforts (a) Study and report (1) In general The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall conduct a study to determine the underlying causes of physiological episodes affecting crewmembers of F–35 aircraft. (2) Elements The study under subsection (a) shall include— (A) an examination of each physiological episode reported by a crewmember of an F–35 aircraft as of the date of the enactment of this Act; and (B) a determination as to the underlying cause of the episode. (3) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes— (A) the results the study conducted under subsection (a), including a description of each physiological episode examined under the study and an explanation of the underlying cause of the episode; (B) a description of any actions that may be taken to address the underlying causes of such episodes, including any resources that may be required to carry out such actions; and (C) any other findings and recommendations of the study. (b) Annual reports on mitigation efforts The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, shall include with the annual report required by section 224(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 (1) the efforts of the Department of Defense to address physiological episodes affecting crewmembers of F–35 aircraft; and (2) the funding allocated for such efforts. 265. Study on mechanisms for attracting and retaining high quality talent in the national security innovation base (a) Study required The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of establishing a program to attract and retain covered individuals for employment in the national security innovation base. (b) Elements The study required under subsection (a) shall include an analysis of— (1) mechanisms the Department of Defense may use to engage institutions of higher education to assist in the identification and recruitment of covered individuals for employment in the national security innovation base; (2) monetary and nonmonetary incentives that may be provided to retain covered individuals in positions in the national security innovation base; (3) methods that may be implemented to ensure the proper vetting of covered individuals; (4) the number of covered individuals needed to advance the competitiveness of the research, development, test, and evaluation efforts of the Department of Defense in the critical technologies identified in the National Defense Strategy; and (5) the type and amount of resources required to implement the program described in subsection (a). (c) Report Not later than February 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the study conducted under subsection (a). (d) Definitions In this section: (1) The term national security innovation base (2) The term institution of higher education 20 U.S.C. 1001 (3) The term covered individual (A) is employed by a United States employer and engaged in work to promote and protect the national security innovation base; (B) is engaged in basic or applied research, funded by the Department of Defense, through an institution of higher education in the United States; and (C) possesses scientific or technical expertise that will advance the development of critical technologies identified in the National Defense Strategy or the National Defense Science and Technology Strategy, required by section 218 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 III Operation and Maintenance A Authorization of Appropriations 301. Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4301. B Energy and Environment 311. Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Clearinghouse for review of mission obstructions Section 183a(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraphs (4) through (6) as paragraphs (5) through (7), respectively; (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following new paragraph (4): (4) If, after issuing the notices of presumed risk required by paragraphs (2) and (3), the Secretary of Defense later concludes for any reason that the energy project will not have an adverse impact on military readiness, the Clearinghouse shall notify the applicant and the governor in writing of that conclusion. ; and (3) in paragraph (7), as so redesignated, by striking Any setback for a project pursuant to the previous sentence shall not be more than what is determined to be necessary by a technical analysis conducted by the Lincoln Laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology or any successor entity. 312. Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Clearinghouse for review of mission obstructions Section 183a(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraphs (4) through (6) as paragraphs (5) through (7), respectively; and (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following new paragraph (4): (4) If, after issuing the notices of presumed risk required by paragraphs (2) and (3), the Secretary of Defense later concludes for any reason that the energy project will not have an adverse impact on military readiness, the Clearinghouse shall notify the applicant and the governor in writing of that conclusion. . 313. Agreements to limit encroachments and other constraints on military training, testing, and operations Section 2684a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (b), by striking An agreement under this section may be entered into with For purposes of this section, the term eligible entity (2) in subsection (d)(1)(A), by striking the entity the eligible entity 314. Modification of Department of Defense environmental restoration authorities to include Federal Government facilities used by National Guard Section 2707(e) of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 316 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (1) by inserting where military activities are conducted by the state National Guard under title 32, facility (2) by adding at the end the following new sentence: The Secretary concerned may also utilize the authority in section 2701(d) of this title for these environmental restoration projects. 315. Increased transparency through reporting on usage and spills of aqueous film-forming foam at military installations (a) In general Chapter 160 2712. Reporting on usage and spills of aqueous film-forming foam Not later than 48 hours after the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Environment receives notice of the usage or spill of aqueous film-forming foam, either as concentrate or mixed foam, at any military installation, the Deputy Assistant Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives notice of such usage or spill. Each such notice shall include each of the following: (1) The name of the installation where the usage or spill occurred. (2) The date on which the usage or spill occurred. (3) The amount, type, and specified concentration of aqueous film-forming foam that was used or spilled. (4) The cause of the usage or spill. (5) A summary narrative of the usage or spill. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 2712. Reporting on usage and spills of aqueous film-forming foam. . 316. Replacement of non-tactical motor vehicles at the end of service life with electric or hybrid motor vehicles Section 2922g of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (c) and (d), respectively; (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): (b) End of life replacement Upon the end of the lease or service life of a motor vehicle, the Secretary of the military department or the head of the Defense Agency shall, to the maximum extent possible, replace such motor vehicle with a motor vehicle that uses an electric or hybrid propulsion system, including a plug-in hybrid system. ; (3) in subsection (c), as so redesignated, by striking Subsection (a) does not Subsections (a) and (b) do not (4) in subsection (d), as so redesignated, by striking The preference required by subsection (a) does not The preference under subsection (a) and the requirement under subsection (b) do not 317. Budgeting of Department of Defense relating to operational energy improvement The Secretary of Defense shall include in the annual budget submission of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, a dedicated budget line item for fielding operational energy improvements, including such improvements for which funds from the Operational Energy Capability Improvement Fund have been expended to create the operational and business case for broader employment. 318. Assessment of Department of Defense operational energy usage (a) In general Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development center with relevant expertise under which such center shall conduct an assessment of Department of Defense operational energy usage, including an agency-wide view and breakdowns of progress by service branch. (b) Elements The assessment required under subsection (a) shall include— (1) an analysis of the extent to which the Department of Defense developed an integrated operational energy strategy and the extent to which each of the military departments has implemented such strategy; (2) an analysis of the viability of implementing net zero initiatives or meeting net zero goals within the operational energy enterprise without negatively impacting mission capability; (3) an analysis of fossil fuel reduction regimes that may maximize reduction of reliance on fossil fuels, including impacts of lowering the reliance on fossil fuels, decreasing the need for refueling convoys, overcoming the tyranny of distance within United States Indo-Pacific Command through hybrid or other fuel efficient propulsion systems, and energy production, storage, and distribution systems that enhance logistics supply chain resiliency; (4) a description of the options for achieving fossil fuel reduction benchmarks with respect to operational energy of 25 percent, 50 percent, 75 percent, and 100 percent, using fiscal year 2020 as the benchmark, including anticipated funding requirements, statutory requirements, infrastructure needs, and timeframes; and (5) an analysis of the integration between energy offices with program offices, budget, and operational planners within the Department of Defense and military departments, and recommendations for improving coordination. (c) Form of report The report required under this section shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. 319. Improvement of the operational energy capability improvement fund of the Department of Defense (a) Management of the operational energy capability improvement fund The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall exercise authority, direction, and control over the Operational Energy Capability Improvement Fund of the Department of Defense (in this section referred to as the OECIF (b) Alignment and coordination with related programs (1) Realignment of oecif Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall realign the OECIF under the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment, with such realignment to include personnel positions adequate for the mission of the OECIF. (2) Better coordination with related programs The Assistant Secretary shall ensure that this placement facilitates better alignment between OECIF, the Strategic Environmental Research Program, the Environmental Security Technology Certification Program, and the Operational Energy Prototyping Program is utilized to advance common goals of the Department, promote organizational synergies, and avoid unnecessary duplication of effort. (c) Program for operational energy prototyping (1) In general Commencing not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, shall carry out a program for the demonstration of technologies related to operational energy prototyping, including demonstration of operational energy technology and validation prototyping. (2) Operation of program The Secretary shall ensure that the program under paragraph (1) operates in conjunction with the OECIF to promote the transfer of innovative technologies that have successfully established proof of concept for use in production or in the field. (3) Program elements In carrying out the program under paragraph (1) the Secretary shall— (A) identify and demonstrate the most promising, innovative, and cost-effective technologies and methods that address high-priority operational energy requirements of the Department of Defense; (B) in conducting demonstrations under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall— (i) collect cost and performance data to overcome barriers against employing an innovative technology because of concerns regarding technical or programmatic risk; and (ii) ensure that components of the Department have time to establish new requirements where necessary and plan, program, and budget for technology transition to programs of record; (C) utilize project structures similar to those of the OECIF to ensure transparency and accountability throughout the efforts conducted under the program; and (D) give priority, in conjunction with the OECIF, to the development and fielding of clean technologies that reduce reliance on fossil fuels. (4) Tool for accountability and transition (A) In general In carrying out the program under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall develop and utilize a tool to track relevant investments in operational energy from applied research to transition to use to ensure user organizations have the full picture of technology maturation and development. (B) Transition The tool developed and utilized under subparagraph (A) shall be designed to overcome transition challenges with rigorous and well-documented demonstrations that provide the information needed by all stakeholders for acceptance of the technology. 320. Five-year reviews of containment technologies relating to Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility (a) Reviews (1) Reviews required At least once every five years, the Secretary of the Navy shall conduct a review of available technologies relating to the containment of fuel to determine whether any such technology may be used to improve the containment of fuel with respect to storage tanks located at the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Hawaii. (2) Deadline for initial review The Secretary shall begin the first review under paragraph (1) by not later than the date that is one year after the date of the enactment of this Act. (b) Briefings Not later than 60 days after the date on which a review conducted under subsection (a) is completed, the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on— (1) any technology identified in such review that the Secretary determines may be used to improve the containment of fuel with respect to storage tanks located at the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility; and (2) the feasibility and cost of implementing any such technology at the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility. (c) Termination The requirements to conduct reviews under subsection (a) and provide briefings under subsection (b) shall terminate on the date on which the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility ceases operation, as determined by the Secretary of the Navy. 321. Limitation on use of funds for acquisition of furnished energy for Rhine Ordnance Barracks Army Medical Center None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2021 may be used to enter into a contract for the acquisition of furnished energy for the new Rhine Ordnance Barracks Army Medical Center (hereafter referred to as the Medical Center 322. Requirement to update Department of Defense climate change roadmap (a) In general Not later than February 1, 2022, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives an update to the Department of Defense 2014 Climate Change Adaptation Roadmap. Such update shall include an outline of the strategy and implementation plan of the Department to address the current and foreseeable effects of climate change on the mission of the Department of Defense. (b) Elements of strategy and implementation plan The strategy and implementation plan required to be included in the update under subsection (a) shall include— (1) a description of the overarching approach of the Department to climate adaptation and climate mitigation measures; and (2) a discussion of the current and foreseeable effects of climate change on— (A) plans and operations, including— (i) military readiness; (ii) increased frequency of extreme weather events, including flooding, drought, desertification, wildfires, thawing permafrost, hurricanes, and extreme heat; (iii) geopolitical instability caused by climate events, including extreme weather; (iv) increased demand for Defense Support for Civil Authorities and disaster or humanitarian relief operations; (v) the operating environment of the Arctic and of the strategic and geopolitical implications of a progressively more ice-free Arctic Ocean; and (vi) alteration or limitation on operation environments; (B) training and testing, including— (i) changes in land carrying capacity; (ii) increased maintenance and repair requirements for equipment and infrastructure; (iii) mitigation of heat stress and heat-related illnesses resulting from increasing temperatures; (iv) increased dust generation and fire hazards; and (v) maintaining testing and training capacity to support increased operations and civil support missions; (C) built and natural infrastructure, including— (i) military installation resilience, as such term is defined in section 101(e)(8) of title 10, United States Code, of installations both within and outside the United States and its possessions and territories and of the State-owned National Guard installations of the several States; (ii) resilience of the air and sea ports of our allies and partners that are critical to the training, deployment, and operations of the armed forces of the United States and its allies and partners; (iii) resilience of the deployment system and structure of the Department of Defense and of the United States, including the strategic highway network, the strategic rail network, and designated strategic air and sea ports; (iv) best practices for modeling and mitigating risks posed to military installations by increased inundation, erosion, flood, wind, and fire damage; (v) changing energy demand at military installations to include heating and cooling, particularly in communities experiencing grid stress; (vi) disruption and competition for reliable energy and water resources; (vii) increased maintenance and sustainment costs; (viii) damage to natural and constructed infrastructure from thawing permafrost and sea ice; and (ix) the effects of climate stress on community support infrastructure, including roads, transportation hubs, and medical facilities; (D) acquisition and supply chain, including— (i) measures to ensure that the current and projected future scale and impacts of climate change are fully considered in the research, development, testing, and acquisition of major weapon systems and of associated supplies and equipment; (ii) required alterations of stockpiles; (iii) reduced or changed availability and access to materials, equipment, and supplies, including water and food sources; (iv) disruptions in fuel availability and distribution; (v) estimated climate security investments required to address foreseeable costs incurred or influenced by climate change for each of the lines of effort in this report, including extreme weather response, over the next five, ten, and twenty years, with topline estimates and a qualitative discussion of cost drivers for each; and (vi) equipment and infrastructure investments required to address a changing Arctic environment; and (E) such other matters as the Secretary determines appropriate. (c) Assessments and projections of the scope and scale of climate change In preparing the update to the climate change roadmap as required under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider— (1) climate projections from the Global Change Research Office, National Climate Assessment, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and other Federal agencies; and (2) data on, and analysis of, the national security effects of climate prepared by the Climate Security Advisory Council of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence established pursuant to section 120 of the National Security Act of 1947 ( 50 U.S.C. 3060 (d) Form The update to the climate change roadmap required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in an unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. If the Secretary determines that the inclusion of a classified annex is necessary, the Secretary shall conduct an in-person briefing for Members of the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives by not later than 90 days after date of the submission of the update. 323. Comptroller General report on Department of Defense installation energy (a) GAO report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on the progress of the Department of Defense toward reaching net zero goals, including an agency-wide view and breakdowns of progress by service branch. (b) Contents of report The report required under subsection (a) shall include— (1) an analysis of the extent to which the Department of Defense has implemented net zero initiatives to date and developed a forward-looking integrated net zero strategy for energy, emissions, water, and waste management and the extent to which each of the military departments has implemented such strategy; (2) a description of the current challenges to implementing net zero initiatives or meeting net zero goals and the degree to which the Department of Defense and the military departments have addressed applied lessons learned; (3) a cost-benefit analysis of net zero initiatives, including a description of how such costs and benefits are identified, tracked, and validated; (4) a description of the feasibility of achieving net zero benchmarks of 25 percent, 50 percent, 75 percent, and 100 percent of the energy, emissions, water, and waste management levels for 2020, including anticipated funding requirements, statutory requirements, infrastructure needs, and timeframes; and (5) an analysis of the integration between energy offices with program offices, budget, and operational planners within the Department of Defense and military departments across the enterprise, and recommendations for improving coordination. (c) Form of report The report required under this section shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. 324. Department of Defense report on emissions levels (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Department of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives and to the Comptroller General a report on the total level of emissions for each of the last ten fiscal years. Such emissions levels shall include the agency-wide total, breakdowns by military department, and delineations between installation and operational emissions. (b) Form of report The report required under this section shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. 325. Objectives, performance standards, and criteria for use of wildlife conservation banking programs (a) In general To ensure opportunities for Department of Defense participation in wildlife conservation banking programs pursuant to section 2694c of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, shall issue regulations of general applicability establishing objectives, measurable performance standards, and criteria for use, consistent with the Endangered Species Act ( 16 U.S.C. 1531 (b) Deadline for regulations The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, shall publish an advance notice of proposed rulemaking for the regulations required by subsection (a) by not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act. 326. Offshore wind energy development, Morro Bay, California (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) Since 2016, the Department of Defense and Department of the Navy have been working with State and Federal stakeholders to determine whether a commercial lease for the development of renewable energy off the coast of Morro Bay, California could be developed in a manner that is compatible with the training and readiness requirements of the Department of Defense. (2) Military readiness and the ability to conduct realistic training are critical to our national security; however, energy security and other ocean uses are also important. These interests should be balanced to the extent practicable when analyzing offshore energy proposals. (3) In August 2019, Members of Congress, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment, senior officials from other Federal agencies, and state and local elected representatives met to discuss a path forward to accommodate wind energy development off the Central Coast of California while ensuring the Department of Defense was able to continue meeting its testing, training, and operational requirements. (4) Following the initial meeting in August 2019, the stakeholder group continued meeting at roughly monthly intervals through 2019 and into 2020 to discuss options and work towards a mutually agreeable solution for renewable energy development and continued military testing, training, and operational requirements off the Central Coast of California. (5) In May 2020, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Energy, Installations, and Environment notified stakeholders that despite the previous year of negotiations, it was his view any wind energy developments off the Central Coast of California may not be viewed as being compatible with military activities. This unilateral decision was made abruptly, without providing any supporting analysis or acknowledgment of the progress and commitments made during previous negotiations, and was not in the spirit of cooperation and collaboration that had driven the previous nine months of stakeholder engagements. (6) Stakeholder confidence in the Department of Defense review process is paramount. Abrupt and unilateral changes of course erode confidence and undermine the State, local, and industry trust in a fair, transparent, and predictable adjudication of potential conflicts. (7) In early 2019, in order to create continuity between the offshore and terrestrial processes, the Department of Defense consolidated its review of proposed energy development projects so that offshore energy proposals were now included in the Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Clearinghouse (the Clearinghouse). The Clearinghouse has a proven record for reviewing proposed energy development projects through a fair and transparent process. The Morro Bay proposal pre-dates this consolidation but underwent a similar Department of Defense led compatibility review. (8) Congress has generally supported the transparent and fair Clearinghouse review process, as well as all efforts between the Department of Defense and other stakeholders to reach solutions that allow for the development of energy projects in a manner that is compatible with military testing, training, and operational requirements. (9) Legislating a solution to a specific energy development proposal should only be reserved for rare occasions. Due to Navy’s abrupt and unilateral decision to walk away from productive negotiations, after months of good-faith efforts by other stakeholders and public engagement, the threshold for congressional intervention has been reached. (b) Responsibility All interaction on behalf of the Department of the Navy with the California Energy Commission, Federal agencies, State and local governments, and potential energy developers regarding proposed offshore wind energy off the central coast of California shall be performed through the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. (c) Briefing requirement; limitation (1) Briefing Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives a briefing on status of the review by the Offshore Energy Working Group of the request to locate at least two offshore wind lease areas proximate to and within the Morro Bay Call Area. Such briefing shall include— (A) a detailed map that shows any areas identified; (B) proposed mitigations that would enable compatible development in the areas identified; (C) any unresolved issues; and (D) any other terms of the agreement reached with the California Energy Commission, other Federal agencies, State and local governments, and potential energy developers. (2) Limitation The Secretary of Defense may not issue a final offshore wind assessment that proposes wind exclusion areas and may not object to an offshore energy project in the Central Coast of California that has filed for review by the Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Clearinghouse until the Secretary provides the briefing required under paragraph (1). (d) Limitation on use of funds Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2021, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Energy, Installations, and Environment until the date that is 30 days after the date on which the briefing required under subsection (c)(1) is provided. 327. Long-duration demonstration initiative and joint program (a) Establishment of initiative Not later than January 15, 2021, the Director of the Environmental Security Technology Certification Program of the Department of Defense (hereinafter in this section referred to as the Director (b) Selection of projects To the maximum extent practicable, in selecting demonstration projects to participate in the demonstration initiative under subsection (a), the Director may— (1) ensure a range of technology types; (2) ensure regional diversity among projects; and (3) consider bulk power level, distribution power level, behind-the-meter, microgrid (grid-connected or islanded mode), and off-grid applications. (c) Joint program (1) Establishment As part of the demonstration initiative under subsection (a), the Director, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy, may establish within the Department of Defense a joint program to carry out projects— (A) to demonstrate promising long-duration energy storage technologies at different scales to promote energy resiliency; and (B) to help new, innovative long-duration energy storage technologies become commercially viable. (2) Memorandum of understanding Not later than 200 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director may enter into a memorandum of understanding with the Secretary of Energy to administer the joint program. (3) Infrastructure In carrying out the joint program, the Director and the Secretary of Energy may— (A) use existing test-bed infrastructure at— (i) installations of the Department of Defense; and (ii) facilities of the Department of Energy; and (B) develop new infrastructure for identified projects, if appropriate. (4) Goals and metrics The Director and the Secretary of Energy may develop goals and metrics for technological progress under the joint program consistent with energy resilience and energy security policies. (5) Selection of projects (A) In general To the maximum extent practicable, in selecting projects to participate in the joint program, the Director and the Secretary of Energy may— (i) ensure that projects are carried out under conditions that represent a variety of environments with different physical conditions and market constraints; and (ii) ensure an appropriate balance of— (I) larger, operationally-scaled projects, adapting commercially-proven technology that meets military service defined requirements; and (II) smaller, lower-cost projects. (B) Priority In carrying out the joint program, the Director and the Secretary of Energy may give priority to demonstration projects that— (i) make available to the public project information that will accelerate deployment of long-duration energy storage technologies that promote energy resiliency; and (ii) will be carried out as field demonstrations fully integrated into the installation grid at an operational scale. 328. Prizes for development of non-PFAS-containing fire-fighting agent (a) Authority The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment and the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program, may carry out a program to award cash prizes and other types of prizes that the Secretary determines are appropriate to recognize outstanding achievements in the development of a non-PFAS-containing fire-fighting agent to replace aqueous film-forming foam with the potential for application to the performance of the military missions of the Department of Defense. (b) Competition requirements A program under subsection (a) shall use a competitive process for the selection of recipients of cash prizes. The process shall include the widely-advertised solicitation of submissions of research results, technology developments, and prototypes. (c) Limitations The following limitations shall apply to a program under subsection (a): (1) No prize competition may result in the award of a prize with a fair market value of more than $5,000,000. (2) No prize competition may result in the award of more than $1,000,000 in cash prizes without the approval of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment. (3) No prize competition may result in the award of a solely nonmonetary prize with a fair market value of more than $10,000 without the approval of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment. (d) Relationship to other authority A program under subsection (a) may be carried out in conjunction with or in addition to the exercise of any other authority of the Department of Defense. (e) Use of prize authority Use of prize authority under this section shall be considered the use of competitive procedures for the purposes of section 2304 of title 10, United States Code. (f) PFAS In this section, the term PFAS (1) man-made chemicals of which all of the carbon atoms are fully fluorinated carbon atoms; and (2) man-made chemicals containing a mix of fully fluorinated carbon atoms, partially fluorinated carbon atoms, and nonfluorinated carbon atoms. (g) Termination The authority to carry out a program under this section shall terminate on October 1, 2024. 329. Survey of technologies for Department of Defense application in phasing out the use of fluorinated aqueous film-forming foam (a) Survey of technologies The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a survey of relevant technologies, other than fire-fighting agent solutions, to determine whether any such technologies are available and can be adapted for use by the Department of Defense to facilitate the phase-out of fluorinated aqueous film-forming foam. The technologies surveyed under this subsection shall include hangar flooring systems, fire-fighting agent delivery systems, containment systems, and other relevant technologies the Secretary determines appropriate. (b) Report Not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the survey conducted under subsection (a). Such report shall include— (1) a description of the technologies included in the survey; (2) a list of the technologies that were considered for further testing or analysis; and (3) any technologies that are undergoing additional analysis for possible application within the Department. 330. Interagency body on research related to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (a) Establishment The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, acting through the National Science and Technology Council, shall establish an interagency working group to coordinate Federal activities to advance research and development needed to address PFAS. (b) Agency participation The interagency working group shall include a representative of each— (1) the Environmental Protection Agency; (2) the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; (3) the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry; (4) the National Science Foundation; (5) the Department of Defense; (6) the National Institutes of Health; (7) the National Institute of Standards and Technology; (8) the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; (9) the Department of Interior; (10) the Department of Transportation; (11) the Department of Homeland Security; (12) the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; (13) the National Toxicology Program; (14) the Department of Agriculture; (15) the Geological Survey; (16) the Department of Commerce; (17) the Department of Energy; (18) the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs; (19) the Office of Management and Budget; and (20) any such other Federal department or agency as the President considers appropriate. (c) Co-chairs The Interagency working group shall be co-chaired by the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy and, on an annual rotating basis, a representative from a Member agency, as selected by the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy. (d) Responsibilities of the working group The interagency working group established under subsection (a) shall— (1) provide for interagency coordination of Federally funded PFAS research and development; and (2) not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this Act, develop a strategic plan for Federal support for PFAS research and development (to be updated not less than every 2 years) that— (A) identifies all current Federally funded PFAS research and development, including the nature and scope of such research and development and the amount of funding associated with such research and development during the current fiscal year, disaggregated by agency; (B) identifies scientific and technological challenges that must be addressed to understand and to significantly reduce the environmental and human health impacts of PFAS and to identify cost-effective— (i) alternatives to PFAS that are designed to be safer and more environmentally friendly; (ii) methods for removal of PFAS from the environment; and (iii) methods to safely destroy or degrade PFAS; (C) establishes goals, priorities, and metrics for Federally funded PFAS research and development that takes into account the current state of research and development identified in paragraph (A) and the challenges identified in paragraph (B); and (D) an implementation plan for Federal agencies. (e) Consultation In developing the strategic plan under subsection (d), the interagency working group shall consult with states, tribes, territories, local governments, appropriate industries, academic institutions and nongovernmental organizations with expertise in PFAS research and development, treatment, management, and alternative development. (f) Annual report For each fiscal year beginning with fiscal year 2022, not later than 90 days after submission of the President’s annual budget request for such fiscal year, the Interagency working group shall prepare and submit to Congress a report that includes— (1) a summary of Federally funded PFAS research and development for such fiscal year and the preceding fiscal year, including a disaggregation of spending for each participating Federal agency; and (2) a description of how Federal agencies are implementing the strategic plan described in subsection (d). (g) PFAS research and development The term PFAS research and development (1) The removal of PFAS from the environment. (2) The safe destruction or degradation of PFAS. (3) The development and deployment of safer and more environmentally friendly alternative substances that are functionally similar to those made with PFAS. (4) The understanding of sources of environmental PFAS contamination and pathways to exposure for the public. (5) The understanding of the toxicity of PFAS to humans and animals. 331. Restriction on procurement by defense logistics agency of certain items containing perfluoroalkyl substances and polyfluoroalkyl substances (a) Prohibition The Director of the Defense Logistics Agency may not procure any covered item containing a perfluoroalkyl substance or polyfluoroalkyl substance. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) The term covered item (A) non-stick cookware or food service ware for use in galleys or dining facilities; (B) food packaging materials; (C) furniture or floor waxes; (D) carpeting, rugs, or upholstered furniture; (E) personal care items; (F) dental floss; and (G) sunscreen. (2) The term perfluoroalkyl substance (3) The term polyfluoroalkyl substance (c) Effective date This section shall take effect on the date that is one year after the date of the enactment of this Act. 332. Standards for removal or remedial actions with respect to PFOS or PFOA contamination (a) In general In conducting removal or remedial actions pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 ( 42 U.S.C. 9601 Public Law 116–92 (1) An enforceable State standard, in effect in that State, for drinking, surface, or ground water, as described in section 121(d)(2)(A)(ii) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 ( 42 U.S.C. 9621(d)(2)(A)(ii) (2) An enforceable Federal standard for drinking, surface, or ground water, as described in section 121(d)(2)(A)(i) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 ( 42 U.S.C. 9621(d)(2)(A)(i) (3) A health advisory under section 1412(b)(1)(F) of the Safe Drinking Water Act ( 42 U.S.C. 300g–1(b)(1)(F) (b) Definitions In this section: (1) The term PFOA (2) The term PFOS (3) The terms removal remedial action 42 U.S.C. 9601 (c) Savings clause Except with respect to the specific level required to be met under subsection (a), nothing in this section affects the application of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 ( 42 U.S.C. 9607 333. Research and development of alternative to aqueous film-forming foam (a) In general The Secretary of Defense, acting through the National Institute of Standards and Technology and in consultation with appropriate stakeholders and manufactures, research institutions, and other Federal agencies shall award grants and carry out other activities to— (1) promote and advance the research and development of additional alternatives to aqueous film-forming foam (in this section referred to as AFFF PFAS (2) advance the use of green and sustainable chemistry for a fluorine-free alternative to AFFF; (3) increase opportunities for sharing best practices within the research and development sector with respect to AFFF; (4) assist in the testing of potential alternatives to AFFF; and (5) provide guidelines on priorities with respect to an alternative to AFFF. (b) Additional requirements In carrying out the program required under subsection (a), the Secretary shall— (1) take into consideration the different uses of AFFF and the priorities of the Department of Defense in finding an alternative; (2) prioritize green and sustainable chemicals that do not pose a threat to public health or the environment; and (3) use and leverage research from existing Department of Defense programs. (c) Report The Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on— (1) the priorities and actions taken with respect to finding an alternative to AFFF and the implementation of such priorities; and (2) any alternatives the Secretary has denied, and the reason for any such denial. (d) Use of funds This section shall be carried out using amounts authorized to be available for the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program. 334. Notification to agricultural operations located in areas exposed to Department of Defense PFAS use (a) Notification required Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture, shall provide a notification described in subsection (b) to any agricultural operation located within 10 square miles of a location where covered PFAS— (1) has been detected in groundwater; (2) has been hydrologically linked to a local water source, including a water well; and (3) is suspected to be, or due to a positive test known to be, the result of the use of PFAS at any installation of the Department of Defense located in the United States or any State-owned facility of the National Guard. (b) Notification requirements The notification required under subparagraph (a) shall include: (1) The name of the Department of Defense or National Guard installation from which the PFAS contamination in groundwater originated. (2) The specific type of PFAS detected in groundwater. (3) The detection levels of PFAS detected. (4) Relevant governmental information regarding the health and safety of the covered PFAS detected, including relevant Federal or State standards for PFAS in groundwater, livestock, food commodities and drinking water, and any known restrictions for sale of agricultural products that have been irrigated or watered with water containing PFAS. (c) Additional testing results The Secretary of Defense shall provide to an agricultural operation that receives a notice under subsection (a) any pertinent updated information, including any results of new elevated testing, by not later than 15 days after receiving such information. (d) Report to Congress Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate and the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives a report on the status of providing notice under subsection (a). Such report shall include, for the period covered by the report— (1) the approximate locations of such operations relative to installations of the Department of Defense located in the United States and State-owned facilities of the National Guard; (2) the PFAS substances detected in groundwater; and (3) the levels of PFAS detected. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term covered PFAS (A) Perfluorooctanoic acid (commonly referred to as PFOA (B) Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (commonly referred to as PFOS (C) Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid ( commonly referred to as PFBS (D) Perfluorohexane sulfonate (commonly referred to as PFHxs (E) Perfluoroheptanoic acid (commonly referred to as PFHpA (F) Perfluorohexanoic acid (commonly referred to as PFHxA (G) Perfluorodecanoic acid (commonly referred to as PFDA (H) Perfluorononanoic acid (commonly referred to as PFNA (2) The term PFAS 335. Public disclosure of results of Department of Defense testing for perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances (a) Public disclosure of pfas testing The Secretary of Defense shall publicly disclose the results of any testing for perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances (commonly referred to as PFAS (1) all such testing results conducted by the Department of Defense; and (2) all such testing results conducted by a non-Department entity (including any Federal agency and any public or private entity) under contract by or pursuant to an agreement with the Department of Defense. (b) Nature of disclosure The Secretary of Defense may satisfy the disclosure requirement under subsection (a) by publishing the information, datasets, and results relating to the testing referred to in such subsection— (1) on the publicly available website established under section 331(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (2) on another publicly available website of the Department of Defense; or (3) in the Federal Register. (c) Requirements The information required to be disclosed by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a) and published under subsection (b) shall— (1) constitute a record for the purposes of chapter 21, 29, 31, and 33 of title 44, United States Code; and (2) include any underlying datasets or additional information of interest to the public, as determined by the Secretary of Defense. (d) Local notification Prior to conducting any testing for perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the managers of the public water system and the publicly owned treatment works serving the areas located immediately adjacent to the military installation where such testing is to occur notice in writing of the testing. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term formerly used defense site Environmental Restoration Account, Formerly Used Defense Sites (2) The term military installation (3) The term perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substance (4) The term public water system 42 U.S.C. 300f(4) (5) The term treatment works 33 U.S.C. 1292(2) C Logistics and Sustainment 351. National Defense Sustainment and Logistics Review (a) In general Chapter 2 section 118 118a. National Defense Sustainment and Logistics Review (a) Quadrennial review required Two years after the submittal of each national defense strategy under section 113(g) of this title, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a comprehensive review of the sustainment and logistics requirements necessary to support the force structure, force modernization, infrastructure, and other elements of the defense program and policies of the United States during the subsequent 5-, 10-, and 25-year periods. Each such review shall be known as the National Defense Sustainment and Logistics Review (b) Report to Congress (1) Not later than the first Monday in February of the year following the fiscal year during which the review required by subsection (a) is submitted, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review. Each such report shall include each of the following: (A) An assessment of the strategic and tactical maritime logistics force (including non-military assets provided by Military Sealift Command and through the Voluntary Intermodal Sealift Agreement) required to support sealift and at sea logistics requirements of forces to meet steady state and contingency requirements. (B) An assessment of the strategic and tactical airlift and tankers (including non-military assets provided by the Civil Reserve Air Fleet and through the Voluntary Tanker Agreement) required to support movement of forces to meet steady state and contingency requirements. (C) An assessment of the location, configuration, and inventory of prepositioned materiel and equipment programs required to meet steady state and contingency requirements. (D) An assessment of the location, infrastructure, and storage capacity for petroleum, oil, and lubricant products, as well as the ability to distribute such products from storage supply points to deployed military forces, required to meet steady state and contingency requirements. (E) An assessment of the capabilities, capacity, and infrastructure of the Department of Defense organic industrial base and private sector industrial base required to meet steady-state and surge software and depot maintenance requirements. (F) An assessment of the production capability, capacity, and infrastructure, of the Department of Defense organic industrial base and private sector industrial base required to meet steady-state and surge production requirements for ammunition and other military munitions. (G) An assessment of the condition, capacity, and location of military infrastructure required to project military forces to meet steady-state and contingency requirements. (H) An assessment of the cybersecurity risks to military and commercial logistics networks and information technology systems. (I) An assessment of the gaps between the requirements identified under subparagraphs (A) through (H) compared to the actual force structure and infrastructure capabilities, capacity, and posture and the risks associated with each gap as it relates to the ability to meet the national defense strategy. (J) A discussion of the identified mitigations being pursued to address each gap and risk identified under subparagraph (I) as well as the initiatives and resources planned to address such gaps, as included in the Department of Defense budget request submitted during the same year as the report and the applicable future-years defense program. (K) An assessment of the extent to which wargames conducted by the Department of Defense, Joint Staff, geographic combatant commands, and military departments incorporate logistics capabilities and threats and a description of the logistics constraints to operations identified through such wargames. (L) Such other matters the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate. (2) The report required under this subsection shall be submitted in classified form and shall include an unclassified summary. (c) Comptroller General review Not later than 180 days after the date on which Secretary submits each report required under subsection (b), the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes an assessment of each of the following: (1) Whether the report includes each of the elements referred to in subsection (b). (2) The strengths and weaknesses of the approach and methodology used in conducting the review required under subsection (a) that is covered by the report. (3) Any other matters relating to sustainment that may arise from the report, as the Comptroller General considers appropriate. (d) Relationship to budget Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect section 1105(a) of title 31. (e) Termination The requirement to submit a report under this section shall terminate on the date that is 10 years after the date of the enactment of this section. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 118 the following new item: 118a. National Defense Sustainment and Logistics Review. . (c) Deadline for submittal of first report Notwithstanding the deadline in subsection (b)(1) of section 118a of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall submit the first report under such section by no later than the date that is 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act. 352. Extension of sunset relating to charter air transportation services Section 9515(k) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 2020 2025 353. Additional elements for inclusion in Navy ship depot maintenance budget report Section 363(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (6) The execution of the planned schedule, categorized by class of ship, for each of the three preceding fiscal years, including— (A) the actual contract award compared to the milestone; (B) the planned completion date compared to the actual completion date; and (C) each regional maintenance center’s availability schedule performance for on-time availability completion. (7) In accordance with the findings of the Government Accountability Office (GAO 20-370)— (A) in 2021, an analysis plan for the evaluation of pilot program availabilities funded by the Other Procurement, Navy account; and (B) in 2022, a report on the Navy’s progress implementing such analysis plan. . 354. Modification to limitation on length of overseas forward deployment of naval vessels Section 323(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 10 U.S.C. 8690 In the case of any naval vessel In the case of any aircraft carrier, amphibious ship, cruiser, destroyer, frigate, or littoral combat ship 355. Independent advisory panel on weapon system sustainment (a) Establishment The Secretary of Defense shall establish an independent advisory panel (in this section referred to as the panel (b) Membership (1) Composition The panel shall be comprised of nine members, of whom— (A) five shall be appointed by the Secretary of Defense; (B) one shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; (C) one shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; (D) one shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; and (E) one shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. (2) Expertise In making appointments under this subsection, consideration should be given to individuals with expertise in public and private-sector acquisition, sustainment, and logistics policy in aviation, ground, maritime systems, and space systems and their related components. (3) Appointment date The appointment of the members of the panel shall be made not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (c) Duties The panel shall— (1) review the weapon system sustainment ecosystem from development, production, and sustainment of the weapon system through use in the field, depot and field-level maintenance, modification, and disposal with a goal of— (A) maximizing the availability and mission capabilities of weapon systems; (B) reducing overall life-cycle costs of weapon systems during fielding, operation and sustainment; and (C) aligning weapon system sustainment functions to the most recent national defense strategy submitted pursuant to section 113 of title 10, United States Code; and (2) using information from the review of the weapon system sustainment ecosystem, make recommendations related to statutory, regulatory, policy, or operational best practices the panel considers necessary. (d) Report (1) Interim report Not later than one year after the date on which all members of the panel have been appointed, the panel shall provide to the Secretary of Defense and the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a briefing on the interim findings and recommendations of the panel. (2) Final report Not later than two years after the date on which all members of the panel have been appointed, the panel shall submit to the Secretary of Defense and the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report setting for a detailed statement of the findings and conclusions the panel as a result of the review described in subsection (c), together with such recommendations related to statutory, regulatory, policy, or operational practices as the panel considers appropriate in light of the results of the review. (e) Administrative matters (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall provide the panel with timely access to appropriate information, data, resources, analysis, and logistics support so that the panel may conduct a thorough and independent assessment as required under this section. (2) Effect of lack of appointment by appointment date If any member has not been appointed by the date specified in subsection (b)(3), the authority to appoint such member under subsection (b)(1) shall expire, and the number of members of the panel shall be reduced by the number equal to the number of appointments so not made. (3) Period of appointment; vacancies Members of the panel shall be appointed for the duration of the panel. Any vacancy in the panel shall not affect its powers, but shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment. (4) Chair The panel shall select a Chair from among its members. The Chair may not be a Federal officer or employee. (f) Termination The panel shall terminate 90 days after the date on which the panel submits the report required under subsection (d)(2). 356. Biannual briefings on status of Shipyard Infrastructure Optimization Plan (a) Briefings required During the period beginning on July 1, 2020, and ending on July 1, 2025, the Secretary of the Navy shall provide to the congressional defense committees biannual briefings on the status of the Shipyard Infrastructure Optimization Plan. (b) Elements of briefings Each briefing under subsection (a) shall include a discussion of the status of each of the following elements: (1) A master plan for infrastructure development, including projected military construction and capital equipment projects. (2) A planning and design update for military construction, minor military construction, and facility sustainment projects over the subsequent five-year period. (3) A human capital management and development plan. (4) A workload management plan that includes synchronization requirements for each shipyard and ship class. (5) Performance metrics and an assessment plan. (6) A funding and authority plan that includes funding lines across the future years defense program. 357. Materiel readiness metrics and objectives for major weapon systems (a) In general Section 118 of title 10, United States Code is amended— (1) by amending the section heading to read as follows: Materiel readiness metrics and objectives for major weapon systems (2) by striking Not later than five days (d) Budget justification Not later than five days ; (3) by inserting before subsection (d) (as designated by paragraph (2)) the following new subsections: (a) Materiel readiness metrics Each head of an element of the Department specified in paragraphs (1) through (10) of section 111(b) of this title shall establish and maintain materiel readiness metrics to enable assessment of the readiness of members of the armed forces to carry out— (1) the strategic framework required by section 113(g)(1)(B)(vii) of this title; and (2) guidance issued by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to section 113(g)(1)(B) of this title. (b) Required metrics At a minimum, the materiel readiness metrics required by subsection (a) shall address the materiel availability, operational availability, operational capability, and materiel reliability of each major weapon system by designated mission, design series, variant, or class. (c) Materiel readiness objectives (1) Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, each head of an element described in subsection (a) shall establish the metrics required by subsection (b) necessary to support the strategic framework and guidance referred to in paragraph (1) and (2) of subsection (a). (2) Annually, each head of an element described in subsection (a) shall review and revise the metrics required by subsection (b) and include any such revisions in the materials submitted to Congress in support of the budget of the President under section 1105 of title 31. ; (4) in subsection (d) (as designated by paragraph (2))— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) by striking materiel reliability, and mean down time metrics for each major weapons system operational availability, and materiel reliability for each major weapon system (ii) by inserting and (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ; and (C) by striking paragraph (3); and (5) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term major weapon system (2) The term materiel availability (3) The term materiel reliability (4) The term operational availability (5) The term operationally capable . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 2 118. Materiel readiness metrics and objectives for major defense acquisition programs. . (c) Briefing Not later than October 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall brief the congressional defense committees regarding the implementation of the materiel readiness metrics required under section 118 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a). D Munitions Safety and Oversight 361. Chair of Department of Defense explosive safety board (a) Responsibilities Section 172 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections: (c) Responsibilities of chair The chair of the explosive safety board shall carry out the following responsibilities: (1) To act as the principal executive representative and advisor of the Secretary on explosive and chemical agent safety matters related to Department of Defense military munitions. (2) To perform the hazard classification approval duties assigned to the chair. (3) To preside over meetings of the explosive safety board. (4) To direct the staff of the explosive safety board. (5) To performs other functions relating to explosives safety management, as directed by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment. (6) To provide impartial and objective advice related to explosives safety management to the Secretary of Defense and the heads of the military departments. (7) To serve as the principal representative and advisor of the Department of Defense on matters relating to explosives safety management. (8) To provide assistance and advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment and the Deputy Director of Land Warfare and Munitions in munitions acquisition oversight and technology advancement for Department of Defense military munitions, especially in the areas of explosives and chemical agent safety and demilitarization. (9) To provide assistance and advice to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Logistics and Material Readiness in sustainment oversight of Department of Defense military munitions, especially in the areas of explosives and chemical agent safety, storage, transportation, and demilitarization. (10) To develop and recommend issuances to define the functions of the explosive safety board. (11) To establishes joint hazard classification procedures with covered components of the Department. (12) To make recommendations to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment with respect to explosives and chemical agent safety tenets and requirements. (13) To conducts oversight of Department of Defense explosive safety management programs. (14) To carry out such other responsibilities as the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate. (d) Responsibilities of executive director and civilian members The executive director and civilian members of the explosive safety board shall— (1) provide assistance to the chair in carrying out the responsibilities specified in subsection (c); and (2) carry out such other responsibilities as the chair determines appropriate. (e) Meetings (1) The explosive safety board shall meet not less frequently than quarterly. (2) The chair shall submit to the congressional defense committees an annual report describing the activities conducted at the meetings of the board. (f) Exclusive responsibilities The explosive safety board shall have exclusive responsibility within the Department of Defense for— (1) recommending new and updated explosive and chemical agent safety regulations and standards to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy Installations and Environment for submittal to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment; and (2) acting as the primary forum for coordination among covered components of the Department on all matters related to explosive safety management. (g) Covered components In this section, the covered components of the Department are each of the following: (1) The Office of the Secretary of Defense. (2) The military departments. (3) The Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff, the Combatant Commands. (4) The Office of the Inspector General of the Department. (5) The Defense Agencies. (6) The Department of Defense field activities. (7) All other organizational entities within the Department. . (b) Deadline for appointment By not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall take such steps as may be necessary to ensure that the explosive safety board of the Department of Defense, as authorized under section 172 of title 10, United States Code, has a chair who is a military officer and whose responsibilities include the day-to-day management of the explosive safety board and the responsibilities provided in subsection (c) of such section. (c) Limitation on use of funds Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available in this Act for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment for fiscal year 2021, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Under Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that all board member positions, including the chair, of the Department of Defense explosive safety board, as authorized under section 172 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by this section, have been filled by military officers as required by such section. 362. Explosive Ordnance Disposal Defense Program (a) Roles, responsibilities, and authorities Section 2284(b) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 1052 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (1) in paragraph (1)(A)— (A) by inserting and integration (B) by striking an Assistant Secretary of Defense the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict (2) in paragraph (2), by striking to whom responsibility is assigned under paragraph (1)(A) for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict (3) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively; and (4) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3): (3) the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict shall coordinate with— (A) the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence on explosive ordnance technical intelligence; (B) the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment on explosive ordnance disposal research, development, and acquisition; (C) the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering on explosive ordnance disposal research, development, test, and evaluation; and (D) the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Security and Global Security on explosive ordnance disposal on defense support of civil authorities; . (b) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report of the Explosive Ordnance Disposal Defense Program under section 2284 of title 10, United States Code. Such report shall include each of the following: (1) The status of the establishment and organization of the Program and the compliance with the requirements of such section, as amended by section 1052 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020. (2) An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of designating the Joint Program Executive Officer for Armaments and Ammunition as the joint program executive officer for the explosive ordnance disposal program or establishing a rotation of the role between an Army, Navy, and Air Force entity on a periodic basis. (3) An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of designating the Director of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency with management responsibility for a Defense-wide program element for explosive ordnance disposal research, development, test, and evaluation transactions other than contracts, cooperative agreements, and grants related to section 2371 of title 10, United States Code, during research projects including rapid prototyping and limited procurement urgent activities and acquisition. 363. Assessment of resilience of Department of Defense munitions enterprise (a) Assessment Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enter into an agreement with a federally-funded research and development center with relevant expertise under which such center shall conduct an assessment of the resilience of the Department of Defense munitions enterprise. (b) Elements The assessment required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements: (1) An identification of the points of failure with respect to the munitions enterprise, including physical locations, materials, suppliers, contractors, and other relevant elements, that, if failure occurs, would have the largest negative impact on the capacity, resiliency, and safety of the enterprise. (2) An evaluation of the efforts of the Department of Defense to address the points of failure identified under paragraph (1). (3) Recommendation with respect to any additional efforts or actions that could be taken to provide for mitigation or solutions with respect to such points of failure. (4) An evaluation of the capacity of the munitions enterprise to support a sudden surge in demand to support a contingency. (5) An evaluation of the capacity of the munitions enterprise to withstand intentional disruption during a conflict. (c) Report and briefings The Secretary shall— (1) submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of assessment conducted under this section by not later than December 31, 2021; and (2) provide for such committees interim briefings on such assessment upon request. (d) Point of failure In this section, the term point of failure 364. Report on safety waivers and mishaps in Department of Defense munitions enterprise (a) Report required The Secretary shall include with the Department of Defense materials submitted to Congress with the budget of the President for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2025 (as submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code), a report on safety waivers provided in the Department of Defense munitions enterprise. Each such report shall include each of the following for the year covered by the report and each of the preceding three years: (1) A list of each waiver, exemption, and secretarial exemption or certification provided with respect to any Department of Defense munitions safety standard. (2) For each such waiver, exemption, or certification provided— (A) the location where the waiver, exemption, or certification was provided; (B) a summary of the justification used for providing the waiver, exemption, or certification; (C) the time period during which the waiver, exemption, or certification applies and the number of times such a waiver, exemption, or certification has been provided at that location; and (D) a list of all safety-related mishaps that occurred at locations where waivers, exemptions, or certifications were in place, and for each such mishap, whether or not a subsequent investigation determined the waiver, exemption, or certification was related or may have been related to the mishap. (3) A list and summary of all class A-E mishaps related to the construction, storage, transportation, usage, and demilitarization of munitions. (4) Any mitigation efforts in place at any location where a waiver, exemption, or certification has been provided or where a safety-related mishap has occurred. (5) Such other matters as the Secretary determines appropriate. (b) Munitions defined In this section, the term munitions E Other Matters 371. Pilot program for temporary issuance of maternity-related uniform items (a) Pilot program The Director of the Defense Logistics Agency, in coordination with the Secretaries concerned, shall carry out a pilot program under which each Secretary concerned shall establish an office for issuing maternity-related uniform items to pregnant members of the Armed Forces, on a temporary basis and at no cost to such member. In carrying out the pilot program, the Director shall take the following actions: (1) The Director shall ensure that such offices maintain a stock of each type of maternity-related uniform item determined necessary by the Secretary concerned, including service uniforms items, utility uniform items, and other items relating to the command and duty assignment of the member requiring issuance. (2) The Director shall ensure that such items have not been treated with the chemical permethrin. (3) The Director, in coordination with the Secretary concerned, shall determine a standard number of maternity-related uniform items that may be issued per member. (4) The Secretary concerned shall ensure that any member receiving a maternity-related uniform item returns such item to the relevant office established under paragraph (1) on the date on which the Secretary concerned determines the member no longer requires such item. (5) The Secretary concerned shall inspect, process, repair, clean, and re-stock items returned by a member pursuant to paragraph (4) for re-issuance from such relevant office. (6) The Director, in coordination with the Secretaries concerned, may issue such guidance and regulations as necessary to carry out the pilot program. (b) Termination No maternity-related uniform items may be issued to a member of the Armed Forces under the pilot program after September 30, 2026. (c) Report Not later than September 30, 2025, the Director of the Defense Logistics Agency, in coordination with the Secretaries concerned, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program. Such report shall include each of the following: (1) For each year during which the pilot program was carried out, the number of members of the Armed Forces who received a maternity-related uniform item under the pilot program. (2) An overview of the costs associated with, and any savings realized by, the pilot program, including a comparison of the cost of maintaining a stock of maternity-related uniform items for issuance under the pilot program versus the cost of providing allowances to members for purchasing such items. (3) A recommendation on whether the pilot program should be extended after the date of termination under subsection (b) and whether legislation is necessary for such extension. (4) Any other matters that the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate. (d) Authorization of appropriations Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide, for fiscal year 2021, as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $10,000,000 shall be available for implementation of the pilot program. 372. Servicewomen’s Commemorative Partnerships (a) In general The Secretary of the Army may enter into a contract, partnership, or grant with a non-profit organization for the purpose of providing financial support for the maintenance and sustainment of infrastructure and facilities at military service memorials and museums that highlight the role of women in the military. Such a contract, partnership, or grant shall be referred to as a Servicewomen’s Commemorative Partnership (b) Authorization of appropriations Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021, as identified in division D of this Act, $3,000,000 shall be available for Servicewomen’s Commemorative Partnerships under subsection (a). 373. Biodefense analysis and budget submission (a) Annual analysis For each fiscal year, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall— (1) conduct a detailed and comprehensive analysis of Federal biodefense programs; and (2) develop an integrated biodefense budget submission. (b) Definition of biodefense In accordance with the National Biodefense Strategy, the Director shall develop and disseminate to all Federal departments and agencies a unified definition of the term biodefense (c) Requirements for analysis The analysis required under subsection (a) shall include— (1) the display of all funds requested for biodefense activities, both mandatory and discretionary, by agency and categorized by biodefense enterprise element, including threat awareness, prevention, deterrence, preparedness, surveillance and detection, response, attribution (including bioforensic capabilities), recovery, and mitigation; and (2) detailed explanations of how each program and activity included aligns with biodefense goals. (d) Submittal to Congress The Director shall submit to Congress the analysis required under subsection (a) for a fiscal year concurrently with the President’s annual budget request for that fiscal year. IV MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS A Active Forces 401. End strengths for active forces The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty personnel as of September 30, 2021, as follows: (1) The Army, 485,900. (2) The Navy, 347,800. (3) The Marine Corps, 184,100. (4) The Air Force, 327,266. (5) The Space Force, 6,434. 402. Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels Section 691(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraphs (1) through (4) and inserting the following new paragraphs: (1) For the Army, 485,900. (2) For the Navy, 347,800. (3) For the Marine Corps, 184,100. (4) For the Air Force, 327,266. (5) For the Space Force, 6,434. . 403. Modification of the authorized number and accounting method for senior enlisted personnel (a) In general Section 517 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the section heading, by striking daily average enlisted end strength (2) in subsection (a)— (A) by striking daily average number of end strength for (B) by striking in a fiscal year as of the last day of a fiscal year (C) by striking 2.5 percent 3.0 percent (D) by striking on the first day of that fiscal year (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 31 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 517 and inserting the following new item: 517. Authorized enlisted end strength: members in pay grades E–8 and E–9. . B Reserve Forces 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve (a) In general The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of September 30, 2021, as follows: (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 336,500. (2) The Army Reserve, 189,800. (3) The Navy Reserve, 58,800. (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 38,500. (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 108,100. (6) The Air Force Reserve, 70,300. (7) The Coast Guard Reserve, 7,000. (b) End strength reductions The end strengths prescribed by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component shall be proportionately reduced by— (1) the total authorized strength of units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component which are on active duty (other than for training) at the end of the fiscal year; and (2) the total number of individual members not in units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component who are on active duty (other than for training or for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their consent at the end of the fiscal year. (c) End strength increases Whenever units or individual members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such units and by the total number of such individual members. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the Reserves Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of September 30, 2021, the following number of Reserves to be serving on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the case of members of the National Guard, for the purpose of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training the reserve components: (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 30,595. (2) The Army Reserve, 16,511. (3) The Navy Reserve, 10,215. (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 2,386. (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 25,333. (6) The Air Force Reserve, 5,256. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status) The minimum number of military technicians (dual status) as of the last day of fiscal year 2021 for the reserve components of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding section 129 of title 10, United States Code) shall be the following: (1) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 22,294. (2) For the Army Reserve, 6,492. (3) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 10,994. (4) For the Air Force Reserve, 7,947. 414. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support During fiscal year 2021, the maximum number of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving at any time on full-time operational support duty under section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, is the following: (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 17,000. (2) The Army Reserve, 13,000. (3) The Navy Reserve, 6,200. (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 3,000. (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 16,000. (6) The Air Force Reserve, 14,000. C Authorization of Appropriations 421. Military personnel (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4401. (b) Construction of authorization The authorization of appropriations in the subsection (a) supersedes any other authorization of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for such purpose for fiscal year 2021. V MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY A Officer Personnel Policy 501. Authorized strength: exclusion of certain general and flag officers of the reserve components on active duty Section 526a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (c) through (h) as subsections (d) through (i), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c): (c) Exclusion of certain officers of the reserve components The limitations of this section do not apply to the following: (1) A general or flag officer of a reserve component who is on active duty— (A) for training; or (B) under a call or order specifying a period of less than 180 days. (2) (A) A general or flag officer of a reserve component who is authorized by the Secretary of the military department concerned to serve on active duty for a period of at least 180 days and not longer than 365 days. (B) The Secretary of the military department concerned may authorize a number, determined under subparagraph (C), of officers in the reserve component of each armed force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary to serve as described in subparagraph (A). (C) Each number described in subparagraph (B) may not exceed 10 percent of the number of general or flag officers, as the case may be, authorized to serve in the armed force concerned under section 12004 of this title. In determining a number under this subparagraph, any fraction shall be rounded down to the next whole number that is greater than zero. (3) (A) A general or flag officer of a reserve component who is on active duty for a period longer than 365 days and not longer than three years. (B) The number of officers described in subparagraph (A) who do not serve in a position that is a joint duty assignment for purposes of chapter 38 of this title may not exceed five per armed force, unless authorized by the Secretary of Defense. . 502. Diversity in selection boards (a) Requirement for diverse membership of active duty selection boards (1) Officers Section 612(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: The members of a selection board shall represent the diversity of the armed forces to the extent practicable. (2) Warrant Officers Section 573(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: The members of a selection board shall represent the diversity of the armed forces to the extent practicable. (b) Requirement for diverse membership of reserve components selection boards Section 14102(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: The members of a selection board shall represent the diversity of the armed forces to the extent practicable. (c) Other selection boards (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the members of each selection board described in paragraph (2) represent the diversity of the armed forces to the extent practicable. (2) Selection board described A selection board described in this paragraph (1) is any selection board used with respect to the promotion, education, or command assignments of members of the Armed Forces that is not covered by the amendments made by this section. 503. Redaction of personally identifiable information from records furnished to a promotion board (a) Active-duty officers Section 615(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (6) as subparagraphs (A) through (F), respectively; (2) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), as redesignated, by inserting (1) The Secretary (3) in subparagraph (C), as redesignated, by striking whose name is furnished to the board under consideration by the board for promotion (4) by striking subparagraph (B), as redesignated, and redesignating subparagraphs (C) through (F) as subparagraphs (B) through (E), respectively; and (5) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) The Secretary of the military department concerned shall redact any personally identifiable information from the information furnished to a selection board under this section. . (b) Reserve officers Section 14107(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (5) as subparagraphs (A) through (E), respectively; (2) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), as redesignated, by inserting (1) The Secretary (3) in subparagraph (C), as redesignated, by striking whose name is furnished to the board under consideration by the board for promotion (4) by striking subparagraph (B), as redesignated, and redesignating subparagraphs (C) through (E) as subparagraphs (B) through (D), respectively; and (5) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) The Secretary of the military department concerned shall redact any personally identifiable information from the information furnished to a promotion board under this section. . (c) Enlisted members Each Secretary of a military department shall prescribe regulations that require the redaction of any personally identifiable information from the information furnished to a board that considers for promotion an enlisted member of an Armed Force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary. B Reserve Component Management 511. Grants to support STEM education in the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (a) Program authority (1) In general Chapter 102 2036. Grants to support science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education (a) Authority The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Education, may carry out a program to make grants to eligible entities to assist such entities in providing education in covered subjects to students in the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps. (b) Coordination In carrying out a program under subsection (a), the Secretary may coordinate with the following: (1) The Secretaries of the military departments. (2) The Secretary of Education. (3) The Director of the National Science Foundation. (4) The Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (5) The heads of such other Federal, State, and local government entities the Secretary of Defense determines to be appropriate. (6) Private sector organizations as the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate. (c) Activities Activities funded with grants under this section may include the following: (1) Training and other support for instructors to teach courses in covered subjects to students. (2) The acquisition of materials, hardware, and software necessary for the instruction of covered subjects. (3) Activities that improve the quality of educational materials, training opportunities, and curricula available to students and instructors in covered subjects. (4) Development of travel opportunities, demonstrations, mentoring programs, and informal education in covered subjects for students and instructors. (5) Students’ pursuit of certifications in covered subjects. (d) Preference In making any grants under this section, the Secretary shall give preference to eligible entities that are eligible for assistance under part A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 6311 (e) Evaluations In carrying out a program under this section, the Secretary shall establish outcome-based metrics and internal and external assessments to evaluate the merits and benefits of the activities funded with grants under this section with respect to the needs of the Department of Defense. (f) Authorities In carrying out a program under this section, the Secretary shall, to the extent practicable, make use of the authorities under chapter 111 and sections 2601 and 2605 of this title, and other authorities the Secretary determines appropriate. (g) Definitions In this section: (1) The term eligible entity (2) The term covered subjects (A) science; (B) technology; (C) engineering; (D) mathematics; (E) computer science; (F) computational thinking; (G) artificial intelligence; (H) machine learning; (I) data science; (J) cybersecurity; (K) robotics; (L) health sciences; and (M) other subjects determined by the Secretary of Defense to be related to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 102 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 2036. Grants to support science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. . (b) Report (1) In general Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on any activities carried out under section 2036 of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)). (2) Congressional defense committees defined In this subsection, the term congressional defense committees 512. Modification of education loan repayment program for members of Selected Reserve (a) Modification of maximum repayment amount Section 16301(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 15 percent or $500 20 percent or $1,000 (b) Effective date and applicability The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to loan repayment under section 16301 of title 10, United States Code, for eligible years of service completed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 513. Requirement of consent of the chief executive officer for certain full-time National Guard duty performed in a State, Territory, or the District of Columbia Section 502(f)(2)(A) of title 32, United States Code, is amended by inserting and performed inside the United States with the consent of the chief executive officer of the State (as that term is defined in section 901 of this title) Defense 514. Constructive credit for certain members of the reserve components who cannot complete minimum annual training requirements as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic (a) Authority Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary, in computing retired pay pursuant to section 12733 of title 10, United States Code, may approve constructive credit, in addition to points earned under section 12732(a)(2) of such title, for a member of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who cannot complete minimum annual training requirements due to cancellation or other extenuating circumstance arising from the covered national emergency. (b) Reporting (1) Report required Not later than one year after the date on which the covered national emergency ends, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the use of the authority under subsection (a). (2) Elements The report under this subsection shall include, with respect to each reserve component, the following: (A) The number of individuals granted constructive credit as a result of a training cancellation. (B) The number of individuals granted constructive credit as a result of another extenuating circumstance. (C) Recommendations of the Secretary whether the authority under subsection (a) should be made permanent and under what circumstances such permanent authority should apply. (3) Publication Not later than 30 days after submitting the report under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall— (A) publish the report on a publicly accessible website of the Department of Defense; and (B) ensure that any data in the report is made available in a machine-readable format that is downloadable, searchable, and sortable. (c) Covered national emergency defined In this section, the term covered national emergency 50 U.S.C. 1601 515. Guidance for use of unmanned aircraft systems by the National Guard (a) New guidance Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue new guidance that provides for the expedited review of requests for the use of unmanned aircraft systems by the National Guard for covered activities within the United States. (b) Covered activities defined In this section, covered activities (1) Emergency operations. (2) Search and rescue operations. (3) Defense support to civil authorities. (4) Support under section 502(f) of title 32, United States Code. 516. Direct employment pilot program for certain members of the reserve components (a) In general The Secretary of Defense may carry out a pilot program to enhance the efforts of the Department of Defense to provide job placement assistance and related employment services directly to members of the National Guard and Reserves in reserve active-status. (b) Administration Any such pilot program shall be offered to, and administered by, the adjutants general appointed under section 314 of title 32, United States Code, or other officials in the States concerned designated by the Secretary for purposes of the pilot program. (c) Cost-Sharing requirement As a condition on the provision of funds under this section to a State to support the operation of the pilot program in that State, the State must agree to contribute an amount, derived from non-Federal sources, equal to at least 50 percent of the funds provided by the Secretary to the State under this section. (d) Development In developing any such pilot program, the Secretary shall— (1) incorporate elements of State direct employment programs for members of the reserve components; and (2) use resources provided to members of the Armed Forces with civilian training opportunities through the SkillBridge transition training program administered by the Department of Defense. (e) Direct employment program model Any such pilot program shall use a job placement program model that focuses on working one-on-one with eligible members to cost-effectively provide job placement services, including— (1) identifying unemployed and underemployed individuals; (2) job matching services; (3) resume editing; (4) interview preparation; and (5) post-employment follow up. (f) Evaluation The Secretary shall develop outcome metrics to evaluate the success of any such pilot program. (g) Reporting (1) Report required If the Secretary carries out the pilot Program, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the results of the pilot program not later than March 1, 2022. The Secretary shall prepare the report in coordination with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau. (2) Elements A report under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A description and assessment of the effectiveness and achievements of the pilot program, including the number of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces hired and the cost-per-placement of participating members. (B) An assessment of the effects of the pilot program and increased reserve component employment on the readiness of members of the reserve components and on the retention of members. (C) A comparison of the pilot program to other programs conducted by the Department of Defense to provide unemployment or underemployment support to members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces, including the best practices developed through and used in such programs. (D) Any other matters the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate. (h) Duration; extension (1) Subject to paragraph (2), the authority to carry out the pilot program expires on September 30, 2024. (2) The Secretary may elect to extend the pilot program for not more than two additional fiscal years. 517. Temporary limitation on authority to transfer, relocate, or dissolve elements of the reserve components of the Air Force (a) Limitation The Secretary of the Air Force may not transfer or relocate any personnel or asset, or dissolve any unit, of the Air National Guard or Air Force Reserve until the latter of the following occurs: (1) The day that is 180 days after the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits the report under subsection (b). (2) The Chief of Space Operations certifies in writing to the Secretary of the Air Force that plans of the Secretary to establish the reserve components of the Space Force shall not diminish space capability of the Department of the Air Force. (b) Report required Not later than January 31, 2021, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report regarding the plan of the Secretary to establish the reserve components of the Space Force. The report shall identify the following: (1) The assumptions and factors used to develop the plan. (2) The members of the team that issued recommendations regarding the organization of such reserve components. (3) The recommendations of the Secretary regarding the mission, organization, and unit retention of such reserve components. (4) The final organizational and integration recommendations regarding such reserve components. (5) The proposed staffing and operational organization for such reserve components. (6) The estimated date of implementation of the plan. (7) Any savings or costs arising from the preservation of existing space-related force structures in the Air National Guard. 518. Pilot programs in connection with SROTC units and CSPI programs at Historically Black Colleges and Universities and minority institutions (a) Pilot programs required The Secretary of Defense may carry out two pilot programs as follows: (1) A pilot program, with elements as provided for in subsection (c), at covered institutions in order to assess the feasibility and advisability of mechanisms to reduce barriers to participation in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps at such institutions by creating partnerships between satellite or extension Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps units at such institutions and military installations. (2) In consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, a pilot program, with elements as provided for in subsection (d), in order to assess the feasibility and advisability of the provision of financial assistance to members of the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps, and members of the Coast Guard College Student Pre-Commissioning Initiative, at covered institutions for participation in flight training. (b) Duration The duration of each pilot program under subsection (a) may not exceed five years. (c) Pilot program on partnerships between satellite or extension SROTC units and military installations (1) Participating institutions The Secretary of Defense shall carry out the pilot program required by subsection (a)(1) at not fewer than five covered institutions selected by the Secretary for purposes of the pilot program. (2) Requirements for selection Each covered institution selected by the Secretary for purposes of the pilot program under subsection (a)(1) shall— (A) currently maintain a satellite or extension Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps unit under chapter 103 (B) establish and maintain a satellite or extension Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps unit that meets the requirements in subparagraph (A). (3) Preference in selection of institutions In selecting covered institutions under this subsection for participation in the pilot program under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall give preference to covered institutions that are located within 20 miles of a military installation of the same Armed Force as the host unit of the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps of the covered institution concerned. (4) Partnership activities The activities conducted under the pilot program under subsection (a)(1) between a satellite or extension Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps unit and the military installation concerned shall include such activities designed to reduce barriers to participation in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps at the covered institution concerned as the Secretary considers appropriate, including measures to mitigate travel time and expenses in connection with receipt of Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps instruction. (d) Pilot program on financial assistance for SROTC and CSPI members for flight training (1) Eligibility for participation by SROTC and CSPI members A member of a Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps unit, or a member of a Coast Guard College Student Pre-Commissioning Initiative program, at a covered institution may participate in the pilot program under subsection (a)(2) if the member meets such academic requirements at the covered institution, and such other requirements, as the Secretary shall establish for purposes of the pilot program. (2) Preference in selection of participants In selecting members under this subsection for participation in the pilot program under subsection (a)(2), the Secretary shall give a preference to members who will pursue flight training under the pilot program at a covered institution. (3) Financial assistance for flight training (A) In general The Secretary may provide any member of a Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps unit or a College Student Pre-Commissioning Initiative program who participates in the pilot program under subsection (a)(2) financial assistance to defray, whether in whole or in part, the charges and fees imposed on the member for flight training. (B) Flight training Financial assistance may be used under subparagraph (A) for a course of flight training only if the course meets Federal Aviation Administration standards and is approved by the Federal Aviation Administration and the applicable State approving agency. (C) Use Financial assistance received by a member under subparagraph (A) may be used only to defray the charges and fees imposed on the member as described in that subparagraph. (D) Cessation of eligibility Financial assistance may not be provided to a member under subparagraph (A) as follows: (i) If the member ceases to meet the academic and other requirements established pursuant to paragraph (1). (ii) If the member ceases to be a member of the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps or the College Student Pre-Commissioning Initiative, as applicable. (e) Evaluation metrics The Secretary of Defense shall establish metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of the pilot programs under subsection (a). (f) Reports (1) Initial report Not later than 180 days after the commencement of the pilot programs under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the pilot programs. The report shall include the following: (A) A description of each pilot program, including in the case of the pilot program under subsection (a)(2) the requirements established pursuant to subsection (d)(1). (B) The evaluation metrics established under subsection (e). (C) Such other matters relating to the pilot programs as the Secretary considers appropriate. (2) Annual report Not later than 90 days after the end of each fiscal year in which the Secretary carries out the pilot programs, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the pilot programs during such fiscal year. Each report shall include, for the fiscal year covered by such report, the following: (A) In the case of the pilot program required by subsection (a)(1), a description of the partnerships between satellite or extension Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps units and military installations under the pilot program. (B) In the case of the pilot program required by subsection (a)(2), the following: (i) The number of members of Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps units, and the number of members of Coast Guard College Student Pre-Commissioning Initiative programs, at covered institutions selected for purposes of the pilot program, including the number of such members participating in the pilot program. (ii) The number of recipients of financial assistance provided under the pilot program, including the number who— (I) completed a ground school course of instruction in connection with obtaining a private pilot's certificate; (II) completed flight training, and the type of training, certificate, or both received; (III) were selected for a pilot training slot in the Armed Forces; (IV) initiated pilot training in the Armed Forces; or (V) successfully completed pilot training in the Armed Forces. (iii) The amount of financial assistance provided under the pilot program, broken out by covered institution, course of study, and such other measures as the Secretary considers appropriate. (C) Data collected in accordance with the evaluation metrics established under subsection (e). (3) Final report Not later than 180 days prior to the completion of the pilot programs, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the pilot programs. The report shall include the following: (A) A description of the pilot programs. (B) An assessment of the effectiveness of each pilot program. (C) A description of the cost of each pilot program, and an estimate of the cost of making each pilot program permanent. (D) An estimate of the cost of expanding each pilot program throughout all eligible Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps units and College Student Pre-Commissioning Initiative programs. (E) Such recommendations for legislative or administrative action as the Secretary considers appropriate in light of the pilot programs, including recommendations for extending or making permanent the authority for each pilot program. (g) Definitions In this section: (1) The term covered institution Public Law 116–92 (2) The term flight training (A) A private pilot’s certificate. (B) A commercial pilot certificate. (C) A certified flight instructor certificate. (D) A multi-crew pilot’s license. (E) A flight instrument rating. (F) Any other certificate, rating, or pilot privilege the Secretary considers appropriate for purposes of this section. (3) The term military installation C General Service Authorities and Correction of Military Records 521. Temporary authority to order retired members to active duty in high-demand, low-density assignments during war or national emergency Section 688a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h); and (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following new subsection: (g) Exception during period of war or national emergency The limitations in subsections (c) and (f) shall not apply during time of war declared by Congress or of national emergency declared by the President. . 522. Reenlistment waivers for persons separated from the Armed Forces who commit one misdemeanor cannabis offense (a) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations that permit any Secretary of a military department to grant a reenlistment waiver to a covered person if the Secretary determines that the reenlistment of that covered person is vital to the national interest. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) The term covered person (A) who has been separated, discharged, dismissed, or released from the Armed Forces; and (B) who has admitted to or been convicted by a court of competent jurisdiction of a single violation— (i) of any law of a State or the United States relating to the use or possession of cannabis; (ii) that constitutes a misdemeanor; and (iii) that occurred while that individual was not performing active service. (2) The terms active service military department 523. Review of Seaman to Admiral-21 program; credit towards retirement (a) Review The Secretary of the Navy shall review personnel records of all participants in the Seaman to Admiral-21 program during fiscal years 2010 through 2014 to determine whether each participant acknowledged, before entering a baccalaureate degree program, that service during the baccalaureate degree program would not be included when computing years of service for retirement. (b) Credit For each participant described in subsection (a) for whom the Secretary cannot find evidence of an acknowledgment described in that subsection, the Secretary shall include service during the baccalaureate degree program when computing— (1) years of service; and (2) retired or retainer pay. (c) Report required The Secretary shall submit a report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives regarding the results of the review under subsection (a) and the number of participants credited with service under subsection (b). (d) Deadline The Secretary of the Navy shall carry out this section not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. D Military Justice and Other Legal Matters 531. Punitive article on violent extremism (a) Violent extremism (1) In general Subchapter X of chapter 47 section 916 916a. Art. 116a. Violent extremism (a) Prohibition Any person subject to this chapter who— (1) knowingly commits a covered offense against— (A) the Government of the United States; or (B) any person or class of people; (2) (A) with the intent to intimidate or coerce any person or class of people; or (B) with the intent to influence, affect, or retaliate against the policy or conduct of the Government of the United States or any State; and (3) does so— (A) to achieve political, ideological, religious, social, or economic goals; or (B) in the case of an act against a person or class of people, for reasons relating to the race, religion, color, ethnicity, sex, age, disability status, national origin, sexual orientation, or gender identity of the person or class of people concerned; is guilty of violent extremism and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct. (b) Attempts, solicitation, and conspiracy Any person who attempts, solicits, or conspires to commit an offense under this section shall be punished in the same manner as a person who completes the offense. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered offense The term covered offense (A) loss, damage, destruction, or wrongful disposition of military property of the United States, in violation of section 908 of this title (article 108); (B) waste, spoilage, or destruction of property other than military property of the United States, in violation of section 909 of this title (article 109); (C) communicating threats, in violation of section 915 of this title (article 115); (D) riot or breach of peace, in violation of section 916 of this title (article 116); (E) provoking speech or gestures, in violation of section 917 of this title (article 117); (F) murder, in violation of section 918 of this title (article 118); (G) manslaughter, in violation of section 919 of this title (article 119); (H) larceny or wrongful appropriation, in violation of section 921 of this title (article 121); (I) robbery, in violation of section 922 of this title (article 122); (J) kidnapping, in violation of section 925 of this title (article 125); (K) assault, in violation of section 928 of this title (article 128); (L) conspiracy to commit an offense specified in any of subparagraphs (A) through (K), as punishable under section 881 of this title (article 81); (M) solicitation to commit an offense specified in any of subparagraphs (A) through (K), as punishable under section 882 of this title (article 82); or (N) an attempt to commit an offense specified in any of subparagraphs (A) through (K), as punishable under section 880 of this title (article 80). (2) State The term State . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 916 (article 116) the following new item: 916a. 116a. Violent extremism. . (b) Effective date The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply to offenses committed on or after such date. 532. Preservation of Court-martial records Section 940a of title 10, United States Code (article 140a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (d) Preservation of court-martial records without regard to outcome The standards and criteria prescribed by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a) shall provide for the preservation of general and special court-martial records, without regard to the outcome of the proceeding concerned, for not fewer than 15 years. . 533. Electronic notarization for members of the Armed Forces Section 1044a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (e) (1) A person named in subsection (b) may exercise the powers described in subsection (a) through electronic means, including under circumstances where the individual with respect to whom such person is performing the notarial act is not physically present in the same location as such person. (2) A determination of the authenticity of a notarial act authorized in this section shall be made without regard to whether the notarial act was performed through electronic means. (3) A log or journal of a notarial act authorized in this section shall be considered for evidentiary purposes without regard to whether the log or journal is in electronic form. . 534. Clarifications regarding scope of employment and reemployment rights of members of the uniformed services (a) Clarification regarding definition of rights and benefits Section 4303(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting (A) The term (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (B) Any procedural protections or provisions set forth in this chapter shall also be considered a right or benefit subject to the protection of this chapter. . (b) Clarification regarding relation to other law and plans for agreements Section 4302 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following: (c) (1) Pursuant to this section and the procedural rights afforded by subchapter III of this chapter, any agreement to arbitrate a claim under this chapter is unenforceable, unless all parties consent to arbitration after a complaint on the specific claim has been filed in court or with the Merit Systems Protection Board and all parties knowingly and voluntarily consent to have that particular claim subjected to arbitration. (2) For purposes of this subsection, consent shall not be considered voluntary when a person is required to agree to arbitrate an action, complaint, or claim alleging a violation of this chapter as a condition of future or continued employment, advancement in employment, or receipt of any right or benefit of employment. . 535. Absentee ballot tracking program (a) Establishment and operation of program Section 102(h) of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act ( 52 U.S.C. 20302(h) (h) Absentee ballot tracking program (1) Requiring establishment and operation of program The chief State election official, in coordination with local election jurisdictions, shall establish and operate an absentee ballot tracking program described in paragraph (2) for the use of absent uniformed services voters and overseas voters. (2) Program described (A) Information on transmission and receipt of absentee ballots An absentee ballot tracking program described in this paragraph is a program under which— (i) the State or local election official responsible for the transmission of absentee ballots in an election for Federal office operates procedures to track and confirm the transmission of such ballots and to make information on the transmission of such a ballot available by means of online access using the Internet site of the official’s office; and (ii) the State or local election official responsible for the receipt of absentee ballots in an election for Federal office operates procedures to track and confirm the receipt of such ballots and (subject to subparagraph (B)) to make information on the receipt of such a ballot available by means of online access using the Internet site of the official’s office. (B) Specific information on receipt of voted absentee ballots The information required to be made available under clause (ii) of subparagraph (A) with respect to the receipt of a voted absentee ballot in an election for Federal office shall include information regarding whether the vote cast on the ballot was counted, and, in the case of a vote which was not counted, the reasons therefor. The appropriate State or local election official shall make the information described in the previous sentence available during the 30-day period that begins on the date on which the results of the election are certified, or during such earlier 30-day period as the official may provide. (3) Use of Toll-Free Telephone Number by Officials Without Internet Site A program established and operated by a State or local election official whose office does not have an Internet site may meet the requirements of paragraph (2) if the official has established and operates a toll-free telephone number that may be used to obtain the information on the transmission or receipt of the absentee ballot which is required under such paragraph. . (b) Effective date The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to an election held during 2022 or any succeeding year. 536. Tracking mechanism and reporting requirements for supremacist, extremist, and criminal gang activity in the Armed Forces (a) Process required The Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement a process to track investigations, criminal and administrative actions, and final determinations with respect to conduct of members of the covered Armed Forces that is prohibited under Department of Defense Instruction 1325.06, titled Handling Dissident and Protest Activities Among Members of the Armed Forces (b) Elements The process under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A mechanism that military criminal investigative organizations may use— (A) to track criminal investigations into the prohibited conduct described in subsection (a), including a mechanism to track those investigations that are forwarded to commanders for administrative action; (B) to provide relevant information from criminal investigations and administrative actions to civilian law enforcement agencies; and (C) to track final administrative actions taken with respect to investigations that are referred to commanders. (2) A mechanism commanders may use to provide information to military criminal investigative organizations on any serious conduct under consideration for administrative action or any final administrative actions taken with respect to the prohibited conduct described in subsection (a). (3) A standardized database, shared among the covered Armed Forces, to ensure that the tracking required under subsection (a) is carried out in the same manner across such Armed Forces. (c) Report Not later than December 1 of each year beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the process implemented under subsection (a). Each report shall include— (1) the number of investigations, criminal and administrative actions, and final determinations tracked over the preceding year; and (2) of the actions enumerated under paragraph (1), the number of instances in which information on the conduct of a member of the covered Armed Forces was referred to civilian law enforcement agencies as a result of the investigation or action. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) The term appropriate congressional committees (A) the Committee on the Judiciary and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on the Judiciary and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. (2) The term covered Armed Forces 537. Military-civilian task force on domestic violence and related information collection activities (a) Military-civilian task force on domestic violence (1) Establishment The Secretary of Defense shall establish a military-civilian task force on domestic violence (in this section, referred to as the Task Force (2) Duties The duties of the Task Force shall be to analyze and develop recommendations, for implementation by the Secretary, with respect to each of the following: (A) The risk of domestic violence at various stages of military service, including identification of— (i) stages at which there is a higher than average risk of domestic violence; and (ii) stages at which the implementation of domestic violence prevention strategies may have the greatest preventive effect. (B) The use and dissemination of domestic violence prevention resources throughout the stages of military service including providing new service members with training in domestic violence prevention. (C) How to best target prevention resources to address those with a higher risk of domestic violence. (D) The implementation of strategies to prevent domestic violence by training, educating, and assigning prevention-related responsibilities to— (i) commanders; (ii) medical, behavioral, and mental health service providers; (iii) family advocacy representatives; (iv) Military Family Life Consultants; and (v) other individuals and entities with responsibilities that may be relevant to addressing domestic violence. (E) The efficacy of providing survivors of domestic violence with the option to request expedited transfers, and the effects of such transfers. (F) Improvements to procedures for reporting appropriate legal actions to the National Crime Information Center and the efficacy of such procedures. (G) The effects of domestic violence on— (i) housing for military families; (ii) the education of military dependent children; (iii) servicemember work assignments and careers; and (iv) the health of servicemembers and their families, including short-term and long-term health effects and effects on mental health. (H) Age-appropriate training and education programs for students attending schools operated by the Department of Defense Education Activity that are designed to assist such students in learning positive relationship behaviors in families and with intimate partners. (I) The potential effects of requiring military protective orders to be issued by a military judge and whether such a requirement would increase the enforcement of military protective orders by civilian law enforcement agencies outside the boundaries of military installations. (J) Whether prevention of domestic violence would be enhanced by raising the disposition authority for offenses of domestic violence to an officer who is— (i) in the grade of 0–6 or above; (ii) in the chain of command of the accused; and (iii) authorized by chapter 47 (K) Consideration of any other matters that the Task Force determines to be relevant to— (i) decreasing the frequency of domestic violence committed by or upon members of the covered Armed Forces and their dependents; and (ii) reducing the severity of such violence. (3) Membership The Task Force shall be composed of the following members: (A) One or more representatives of family advocacy programs of the Department of Defense. (B) One or more representatives of the Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services. (C) One or more medical personnel of the Department of Defense. (D) One or more Judge Advocates General. (E) One or more military police or other law enforcement personnel of the covered Armed Forces. (F) One or more military commanders. (G) One or more individuals whose duties include planning, executing, and evaluating training of the covered Armed Forces. (H) Civilians who are experts on domestic violence or who provide services relating to domestic violence, including— (i) not fewer than two representatives from the national domestic violence resource center and the special issue resource centers referred to in section 310 of the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act ( 42 U.S.C. 10410 (ii) not fewer than two representatives from national domestic violence organizations; (iii) not fewer than two representatives from State domestic violence and sexual assault coalitions; and (iv) not fewer than two domestic violence service providers who provide services in communities located near military installations. (I) One or more representatives who are subject matter experts on— (i) scientific and other research relating to domestic violence; and (ii) science-based strategies for the prevention, intervention, and response to domestic violence. (J) Civilian law enforcement personnel. (K) One or more representatives from the Office on Violence Against Women of the Department of Justice. (L) One or more representatives of the Family Violence Prevention and Services Program of the Department of Health and Human Services. (M) One or more representatives from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (4) Appointment by Secretary of Defense (A) In general The Secretary of Defense shall appoint the members of the Task Force specified in subparagraphs (A) through (M) of paragraph (3). (B) Consultation (i) Consultation with Attorney General In appointing members under subparagraph (K) of paragraph 3, the Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Attorney General. (ii) Consultation with Secretary of HHS In appointing members under subparagraphs (L) and (M) of such paragraph, the Secretary shall consult with the Secretary of Health and Human Services (C) Inclusion of certain personnel The Secretary shall ensure that the members appointed by the Secretary under this subparagraph include— (i) representatives of the Office of the Secretary of Defense; (ii) general and flag officers; (iii) noncommissioned officers; and (iv) other enlisted personnel of the covered Armed Forces. (5) Total number of members The total number of members appointed to the Task Force shall be not more than 25. (6) Chairperson (A) Nominee list On an annual basis, the Task Force shall submit to the Secretary a list of members of the Task Force who may be considered for the position of chairperson of the Task Force. (B) Selection From the list submitted to the Secretary under subparagraph (A) for each year, the Secretary of Defense shall designate one member of the Task Force to serve as the chairperson of the Task Force. (C) Term The chairperson designated by the Secretary under subparagraph (B) shall serve for a term of one year and may serve for additional terms of one year if redesignated as the chairperson by the Secretary under such subparagraph. (7) Meetings The first meeting of the Task Force shall convene not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. Thereafter, the task Force shall meet in plenary session not less frequently than once annually. (8) Compensation and travel expenses Each member of the Task Force shall serve without compensation (other than the compensation to which such member may be entitled as a member of the covered Armed Forces or an officer or employee of the United States, as the case may be), but shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of agencies under subchapter I of chapter 57 (9) Site visits In the carrying out the duties described in paragraph (2), members of the Task Force shall— (A) on an annual basis, visit one or more military installations outside the United States; and (B) on a semiannual basis, visit one or more military installations within the United States. (10) Oversight and administration The Secretary of Defense shall designate an appropriate organization within the Office of the Secretary of Defense to— (A) provide oversight of the Task Force; (B) provide the Task Force with the personnel, facilities, and other administrative support that is necessary for the performance of the Task Force’s duties; and (C) on a rotating basis, direct the Secretary of each military department to— (i) coordinate visits of the Task Force to military installations; and (ii) provide administrative, logistical, and other support for the meetings of the Task Force. (11) Reports (A) Reports to Secretary (i) Initial report Not later than one year after the date on which the members of the Task Force are appointed under paragraph (3), the Task Force shall submit to the Secretary of Defense recommendations with respect to each matter described in paragraph (2). (ii) Subsequent reports After submitting the initial report under subparagraph (A), the Task Force shall, from time to time, submit to the Secretary of Defense such analyses and recommendations as the Task Force considers appropriate to improve the effectiveness of the covered Armed Forces in responding to and preventing domestic violence. (B) Reports to Congress On an annual basis until the date on which the Task Force terminates under paragraph (12), the Task Force shall submit to Congress a report that includes— (i) a description of any improvements in the response of the covered Armed Forces to domestic violence over the preceding year; (ii) an explanation of any pending research on domestic violence that may be relevant to domestic violence involving members of the covered Armed Forces; and (iii) such analyses and recommendations as the Task Force considers appropriate to improve the effectiveness of the covered Armed Forces in responding to and preventing domestic violence (12) Termination (A) In general Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the Task Force shall terminate on the date that is five years after the date of the first meeting of the Task Force. (B) Continuation (i) In General Subject to clause (ii), the Secretary of Defense may continue the Task Force for a period of up to two years after the termination date applicable under subparagraph (A) if the Secretary determines that continuation of the Task Force is advisable and appropriate. (ii) Notice to Congress If the Secretary determines to continue the Task Force under clause (i), not later than 90 days before the termination date applicable under subparagraph (A) and annually thereafter until the new date of the termination of the Task Force, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a notice describing the reasons for the continuation and confirming the new termination date. (13) Implementation of recommendations (A) In general Except as provided in subparagraph (B), not later than 180 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense receives the initial report of the Task Force under paragraph (11)(A)(i), the Secretary shall, in consultation with the Task Force, implement the recommendations of the Task Force with respect to each matter described in paragraph (2). (B) Waiver The Secretary of Defense may waive the requirement under subparagraph (A) with respect to a recommendation of the Task force by submitting to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a written notification setting forth the reasons for the Secretary’s decision not to implement the recommendation. (b) Information collection and reporting (1) Information collection (A) Regular information collection Using the mechanism developed under subparagraph (B), the Secretary of Defense shall regularly collect information to measure the prevalence of domestic violence involving members of the covered Armed Forces, their intimate partners, and immediate family members. (B) Mechanism to measure domestic violence The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Centers for Disease Control and civilian organizations with expertise in conducting informational surveys, shall develop a mechanism to carry out the information collection required under subparagraph (A). (2) Annual report on domestic violence (A) Report required On an annual basis, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on domestic violence in the covered Armed Forces. (B) Elements The report required under subparagraph (A) shall include, with respect to the year covered by the report, the following: (i) Based on the information collected under paragraph (1), an assessment of the prevalence of domestic violence involving members of the covered Armed Forces, their intimate partners, and immediate family members. (ii) The number of convictions under section 928b of title 10, United States Code (article 128b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). (iii) The recidivism rate for members of the covered Armed Forces convicted of domestic violence offenses. (iv) The number instances in which a member of the covered Armed Forces received an administrative discharge as a result of the member’s involvement in a domestic violence incident. (v) The number of instances in which a member of the covered Armed Forces was prohibited from possessing firearms as a result of the member’s conviction for a domestic violence offense. (vi) Of the incidents described in clause (v), the number of instances in which the member received a waiver of such prohibition or was otherwise allowed to access firearms for duty purposes. (vii) An explanation of the status of data sharing between the Department of Defense and civilian law enforcement agencies on matters relating to domestic violence. (c) Covered Armed Forces defined In this section, the term covered Armed Forces 538. Actions to address military-connected child abuse (a) In general Consistent with the recommendations of the Government Accountability Office in the report titled Increased Guidance and Collaboration Needed to Improve DOD's Tracking and Response to Child Abuse (b) Activities required The activities carried out under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) The Secretary of Defense shall expand the scope of the Department of Defense’s centralized database on problematic sexual behavior in children and youth to track information on all incidents involving child abuse reported to a Family Advocacy Program or investigated by a military law enforcement organization, regardless of whether the perpetrator of the abuse is another child, an adult, or a person in a noncaregiving role at the time of the incident. (2) The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of each military department, shall ensure— (A) that each Family Advocacy Program records, in a database of the Program, the date on which the Program notified a military law enforcement organization of a reported incident of child abuse; and (B) that each military law enforcement organization records, in a database of the organization, the date on which the organization notified a Family Advocacy Program of a reported incident of child abuse. (3) The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of each military department, shall issue guidance that clarifies the process through which the Family Advocacy Program of a covered Armed Force will receive, and incorporate into the Program’s central registry, information regarding child abuse allegations involving members of that a covered Armed Force and dependents of such members in cases in which such allegations were previously recorded by the Family Advocacy Program of another covered Armed Force. Such guidance shall include a mechanism for monitoring the process to ensure that the process is carried out consistently. (4) Each covered Armed Force shall develop a process to monitor how reported incidents of child abuse are screened at military installations to help ensure that all reported child abuse incidents that should be presented to an Incident Determination Committee are consistently presented and tracked. (5) The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, in consultation with the Director of the Department of Defense Education Activity, clarifies Department of Defense Education Activity guidance to define what types of child abuse incidents must be reported as serious incidents to help ensure that all serious incidents of which Department of Defense Education Activity leadership needs to be informed are accurately and consistently reported by school administrators. (6) The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall— (A) expand the voting membership of each Incident Determination Committee to include medical personnel with requisite knowledge and experience; and (B) ensure, to the extent practicable, that voting membership of a Committee includes medical personnel with expertise in pediatric medicine in cases in which a reported incident of child abuse is under review by the Committee. (7) Each covered Armed Force shall implement procedures to provide the families of child abuse victims with comprehensive information on how reported incidents of child abuse will be addressed. Such practices may include the development of a guide that— (A) explains the processes the Family Advocacy Program and military law enforcement organizations will follow to address the report; and (B) identifies services and other resources available to victims and their families. (8) The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall issue guidance to clarify the circumstances under which military commanders may exercise the authority to remove a child from a potentially unsafe home on a military installation outside the United States. (9) The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, in consultation with the Director of the Defense Health Agency, establishes processes that help ensure children who are sexually abused outside the United States have timely access to a certified pediatric sexual assault forensic examiner to conduct an examination. Such processes may include certifying pediatricians, or adult sexual assault forensic examiners who have pediatric sexual assault nurse examiner training in a multidisciplinary team setting, as pediatric examiners during mandatory training or establishing shared regional assets. (10) The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Deputy Attorney General, shall establish procedures for military criminal investigative organizations to communicate with United States Attorneys, State Attorneys General, and local prosecutors for relevant cases involving child victims, including establishing protocols that— (A) ensure that military investigators are notified when a prosecution is declined; (B) provide notice to victims of the status of prosecutions and, as applicable, the reasons for the declination to prosecute; (C) arrange for specialized victim services outside of the Department of Defense to be provided to juvenile victims to the extent possible; (D) facilitate legal assistance or other civil legal aid services to juvenile victims; and (E) ensure that juveniles accused of crimes are, to the extent possible, provided defense counsel who are trained in representing juveniles. (11) The Secretary of each military department shall seek to develop a memorandum of understanding with the National Children's Alliance that makes children's advocacy center services and protocols available to all military installations of the department and increases awareness of those services across the department. (c) Deadline The Secretary of Defense shall carry out the activities described in subsection (b) not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) The term child abuse (2) The term covered Armed Forces (3) The term Incident Determination Committee (4) The term military-connected 539. Multidisciplinary board to evaluate suicide events (a) Guidance required The Secretary of Defense shall issue guidance that requires each suicide event involving of a member of a covered Armed Force to be reviewed by a multidisciplinary board established at the command or installation level. Such guidance shall require that, for each suicide event reviewed by such a board, the board will— (1) clearly define the objective, purpose, and outcome of the review; (2) take a multidisciplinary appraoch to the review and include, as part of the review process, leaders of military units, medical and mental health professionals, and representatives of military criminal investigative organizations; (3) obtain the data necessary to make a comprehensive Department of Defense suicide event report submission; and (4) take appropriate steps to protect and share information obtained from ongoing investigations into the event (such as medical and law enforcement reports). (b) Implementation by covered Armed Forces Not later than 90 days after the date on which the guidance is issued under subsection (a), the chiefs of the covered Armed Forces shall implement the guidance. (c) Progress report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the progress of the Secretary in implementing the guidance required under subsection (a). (d) Covered Armed Forces defined In this section, the term covered Armed Forces E Sexual Assault 541. Protection of attorney-client privilege between victims and Special Victims’ Counsel (a) Special Victims' Counsel Subsection (c) of section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (c) Nature of relationship (1) Attorney-client relationship The relationship between a Special Victims' Counsel and a victim in the provision of legal advice and assistance shall be the relationship between an attorney and client. (2) Testimony in legal proceedings During any criminal legal proceeding in which a Special Victims’ Counsel is asked to testify or give evidence, the Special Victims’ Counsel shall be given the same consideration as counsel for the Government and counsel for the accused. . (b) Revision to Military Rules of Evidence Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, Rule 502 of the Military Rules of Evidence shall be modified to provide that the privilege between a Special Victims’ Counsel and a client shall be the same as lawyer-client privilege. 542. Authority of military judges and military magistrates to issue military court protective orders (a) Judge-issued military court protective orders Chapter 80 1567b. Authority of military judges and military magistrates to issue military court protective orders (a) Authority to issue military court protective orders The President shall prescribe regulations authorizing military judges and military magistrates to issue protective orders in accordance with this section. A protective order issued in accordance with this section shall be known as a military court protective order (b) Enforcement by civilian authorities (1) In general In prescribing regulations for military court protective orders, the President shall seek to ensure that the protective orders are issued in a form and manner that is enforceable by State, local, territorial, and tribal civilian law enforcement authorities. (2) Full faith and credit Any military court protective order, should be accorded full faith and credit by the court of a State, local, territorial, or tribal jurisdiction (the enforcing jurisdiction) and enforced by the court and law enforcement personnel of that jurisdiction as if it were the order of the enforcing jurisdiction. (3) Reciprocity agreements Consistent with paragraphs (1) and (2), the Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into reciprocity agreements with State, local, territorial, and tribal civilian law enforcement authorities under which— (A) such authorities agree to enforce military court protective orders; and (B) the Secretary agrees to enforce protective orders issued by such authorities that are consistent with section 2265(b) of title 18. (c) Purpose and form of issuance A military court protective order may be issued for the purpose of protecting a victim of an alleged sex or domestic violence offense, or a family member or associate of the victim, from a person subject to chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) who is alleged to have committed such an offense. (d) Timing and manner of issuance A military court protective order may be issued— (1) by a military magistrate, before referral of charges and specifications to court-martial for trial, at the request of— (A) a victim of an alleged sex or domestic violence offense; or (B) a Special Victims’ Counsel or other qualified counsel acting on behalf of the victim; or (2) by a military judge, after referral of charges and specifications to court-martial for trial, at the request of qualified counsel, which may include a Special Victims’ Counsel acting on behalf of the victim or trial counsel acting on behalf of the prosecution. (e) Duration and renewal of protective order (1) Duration A military court protective order shall be issued for an initial period of thirty days and may be reissued for one or more additional periods of thirty days in accordance with paragraph (2). (2) Expiration and renewal Before the expiration of any 30 day period during which a military court protective order is in effect, a military judge or military magistrate shall review the order to determine whether the order will terminate at the expiration of such period or be reissued for an additional period of 30 days. (3) Notice to protected persons If a military judge or military magistrate determines under paragraph (2) that a military court protective order will terminate, the judge or magistrate concerned shall provide to each person protected by the order reasonable, timely, and accurate notification of the termination. (f) Review of magistrate-issued orders (1) Review A military judge, at the request of the person subject to a military court protective order that was issued by a military magistrate, may review the order to determine if the order was properly issued by the magistrate. (2) Standards of review A military judge who reviews an order under paragraph (1) shall terminate the order if the judge determines that— (A) the military magistrate’s decision to issue the order was an abuse of discretion, and there is not sufficient information presented to the military judge to justify the order; or (B) information not presented to the military magistrate establishes that the military court protective order should be terminated. (g) Due process (1) Protection of due process Except as provided in paragraph (2), a protective order authorized under subsection (a) may be issued only after reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard, directly or through counsel, is given to the person against whom the order is sought sufficient to protect that person's right to due process. (2) Emergency orders A protective order on an emergency basis may be issued on an ex parte basis under such rules and limitations as the President shall prescribe. In the case of ex parte orders, notice and opportunity to be heard must be provided within a reasonable time after the order is issued, sufficient to protect the respondent's due process rights. (h) Rights of victim The victim of an alleged sex or domestic violence offense who seeks a military court protective order has, in addition to any rights provided under section 806b (article 6b), the following rights with respect to any proceeding involving the protective order: (1) The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of the proceeding and of any change in the status of the protective order resulting from the proceeding. (2) The right to be reasonably heard at the proceeding. (3) The right to appear in person, with or without counsel, at the proceeding. (4) The right be represented by qualified counsel in connection with the proceeding, which may include a Special Victims’ Counsel. (5) The reasonable right to confer with a representative of the command of the accused and counsel representing the government at the proceeding, as applicable. (6) The right to submit a written statement, directly or through counsel, for consideration by the military judge or military magistrate presiding over the proceeding. (i) Restrictions on access to firearms (1) In general Notwithstanding any other provision of law— (A) a military court protective order issued on an ex parte basis shall restrain a person from possessing, receiving, or otherwise accessing a firearm; and (B) a military court protective order issued after the person to be subject to the order has received notice and opportunity to be heard on the order, shall restrain such person from possessing, receiving, or otherwise accessing a firearm in accordance with section 922 of title 18. (2) Notice to Attorney General Not later than 72 hours after the issuance of an order described in paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Attorney General a record of the order. (j) Treatment as lawful order A military court protective order shall be treated as a lawful order for purposes of the application of section 892 (article 92) and a violation of such an order shall be punishable under such section (article). (k) Command matters (1) Inclusion in personnel file Any military court protective order against a member shall be placed and retained in the military personnel file of the member. (2) Notice to civilian law enforcement of issuance Any military court protective order against a member shall be treated as a military protective order for purposes of section 1567a including for purposes of mandatory notification of issuance to civilian law enforcement as required by that section. (l) Relationship to other authorities Nothing in this section may be construed as prohibiting— (1) a commanding officer from issuing or enforcing any otherwise lawful order in the nature of a protective order to or against members of the officer’s command; (2) pretrial restraint in accordance with Rule for Courts-Martial 304 (as set forth in the Manual for Courts-Martial, 2019 edition, or any successor rule); or (3) pretrial confinement in accordance with Rule for Courts-Martial 305 (as set forth in the Manual for Courts-Martial, 2019 edition, or any successor rule) (m) Delivery to certain persons A physical and electronic copy of any military court protective order shall be provided, as soon as practicable after issuance, to the following: (1) The person or persons protected by the protective order or to the guardian of such a person if such person is under the age of 18 years. (2) The person subject to the protective order. (3) To such commanding officer in the chain of command of the person subject to the protective order as the President shall prescribe for purposes of this section. (n) Definitions In this section: (1) Contact The term contact (2) Communication The term communication (3) Covered sex or domestic violence offense The term covered sex or domestic violence offense (A) an alleged sex-related offense (as defined in section 1044e(h)); or (B) an alleged offense of domestic violence under section 928b of this title (article 128b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) or an attempt to commit such an offense that is punishable under section 880 of this title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). (4) Military judge and military magistrate The terms military judge military magistrate (5) Protective order The term protective order (A) restrains a person from harassing, stalking, threatening, or otherwise contacting or communicating with a victim of an alleged sex or domestic violence offense, or a family member or associate of the victim, or engaging in other conduct that would place such other person in reasonable fear of bodily injury to any such other person; (B) by its terms, explicitly prohibits— (i) the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force by the person against a victim of an alleged sex or domestic violence offense, or a family member or associate of the victim, that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury; (ii) the initiation by the person restrained of any contact or communication with such other person; or (iii) actions described by both clauses (i) and (ii). (6) Special Victims’ Counsel The term Special Victims Counsel . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 1567b. Authority of military judges and military magistrates to issue military court protective orders. . (c) Implementation The President shall prescribe regulations implementing section 1567b of title 10, United States Code, not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act. 543. Additional bases for provision of advice by the Defense Advisory Committee for the Prevention of Sexual Misconduct Section 550B(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (1) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (E); and (2) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new subparagraphs: (C) Efforts among private employers to prevent sexual assault and sexual harassment among their employees. (D) Evidence-based studies on the prevention of sexual assault and sexual harassment in the Armed Forces, institutions of higher education, and the private sector. . 544. Modification of reporting and data collection on victims of sexual offenses Section 547 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 10 U.S.C. 1561 (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) by striking accused of suspected of (ii) by striking assault offense (B) in paragraph (2), by striking accused of suspected of (C) in paragraph (3)— (i) by striking assaults offenses (ii) by striking an accusation suspicion of (2) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); (3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection: (b) Guidance required The Secretary of Defense shall issue guidance to ensure the uniformity of the data collected by each Armed Force for purposes of subsection (a). At a minimum, such guidance shall establish— (1) standardized methods for the collection of the data required to be reported under such subsection; and (2) standardized definitions for the terms sexual offense collateral miconduct adverse action ; and (4) by amending subsection (c), as so redesignated, to read as follows: (c) Definitions In this section: (1) The term covered individual (2) The term suspected of chapter 47 . 545. Modification of annual report regarding sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces (a) Submission to Congress Section 1631(d) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 ( Public Law 111–383 10 U.S.C. 1561 and the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and the House of Representatives House of Representatives (b) Applicability The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply to reports required to be submitted under section 1631 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 ( Public Law 111–383 10 U.S.C. 1561 546. Coordination of support for survivors of sexual trauma (a) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries of Defense and Veterans Affairs shall jointly develop, implement, and maintain a standard of coordinated care for members of the Armed Forces who are survivors of sexual trauma. Such standard shall include the following: (b) Minimum elements The standard developed and implemented under subsection (a) by the Secretaries of Defense and Veterans Affairs shall include the following: (1) Information for members of the Armed Forces The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that— (A) Sexual Assault Response Coordinators and Uniformed Victim Advocates receive annual training on resources of the Department of Veterans Affairs regarding sexual trauma; (B) information regarding services furnished by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to survivors of sexual trauma is provided to each such survivor; and (C) information described in subparagraph (B) is posted in the following areas in each facility of the Department of Defense: (i) An office of the Family Advocacy Program. (ii) An office of a mental health care provider. (iii) Each area in which sexual assault prevention staff normally post notices or information. (iv) High-traffic areas (including dining facilities). (2) Coordination between staff of the Departments The Secretaries shall ensure that a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator or Uniformed Victim Advocate of the Department of Defense who receives a report of an instance of sexual trauma connects the survivor to the Military Sexual Trauma Coordinator of the Department of Veterans Affairs at the facility of that Department nearest to the residence of that survivor if that survivor is a member separating or retiring from the Armed Forces. (c) Reports (1) Report on residential treatment Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries of Defense and Veterans Affairs shall provide a report to the appropriate committees of Congress regarding the availability of residential treatment programs for survivors of sexual trauma, including— (A) barriers to access for such programs; and (B) resources required to reduce such barriers. (2) Initial report Upon implementation of the standard under subsection (a), the Secretaries of Defense and Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the standard. (3) Progress reports Not later than 180 days after submitting the initial report under paragraph (2), and on December 1 of each subsequent year, the Secretaries of Defense and Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the progress of the Secretaries in implementing and improving the standard. (4) Updates Whenever the Secretaries of Defense and Veterans Affairs update the standard developed under subsection (a), the Secretaries shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on such update, including a comprehensive and detailed description of such update and the reasons for such update. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) The term sexual trauma (2) The term appropriate committees of Congress (A) the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Senate; and (B) the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate. 547. Policy on separation of victim and accused at military service academies (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments and the Superintendent of each military service academy, prescribe in regulations a policy under which a cadet or midshipman of a military service academy who is the alleged victim of a sexual assault and a cadet or midshipman who is the alleged perpetrator of such assault shall, to the extent practicable, each be given the opportunity to complete their course of study at the academy without— (1) taking classes together; or (2) otherwise being in close proximity to each other during mandatory activities. (b) Elements The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the policy developed under subsection (a)— (1) protects the alleged victim as necessary, including by prohibiting retaliatory harassment; (2) allows both the victim and the accused to complete their course of study at the institution with minimal disruption; (3) protects the privacy of both the victim and the accused by ensuring that information about the alleged sexual assault and the individuals involved is not revealed to third parties who are not specifically authorized to receive such information in the course of performing their regular duties, except that such policy shall not preclude the alleged victim or the alleged perpetrator from making such disclosures to third parties; and (4) minimizes the burden on the alleged victim when taking steps to separate the alleged victim and alleged perpetrator. (c) Special rule The policy developed under subsection (a) shall not preclude a military service academy from taking other administrative or disciplinary action when appropriate. (d) Military service academy defined In this section, the term military service academy (1) The United States Military Academy. (2) The United States Naval Academy. (3) The United States Air Force Academy. 548. Safe-to-report policy applicable across the Armed Forces (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, prescribe in regulations a safe-to-report policy described in subsection (b) that applies with respect to all members of the covered Armed Forces (including members of the reserve components of the covered Armed Forces) and cadets and midshipmen at the military service academies. (b) Safe-to-report policy The safe-to-report policy described in this subsection is a policy that prescribes the handling of minor collateral misconduct involving a member of the covered Armed Forces who is the alleged victim of sexual assault. (c) Aggravating circumstances The regulations under subsection (a) shall specify aggravating circumstances that increase the gravity of minor collateral misconduct or its impact on good order and discipline for purposes of the safe-to-report policy. (d) Tracking of collateral misconduct incidents In conjunction with the issuance of regulations under subsection (a), Secretary shall develop and implement a process to track incidents of minor collateral misconduct that are subject to the safe-to-report policy. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term covered Armed Forces armed forces (2) The term military service academy (A) The United States Military Academy. (B) The United States Naval Academy. (C) The United States Air Force Academy. (3) The term minor collateral misconduct chapter 47 (A) is committed close in time to or during the sexual assault, and directly related to the incident that formed the basis of the sexual assault allegation; (B) is discovered as a direct result of the report of sexual assault or the ensuing investigation into the sexual assault; and (C) does not involve aggravating circumstances (as specified in the regulations prescribed under subsection (c)) that increase the gravity of the minor misconduct or its impact on good order and discipline. 549. Question in workplace and gender relations surveys regarding prosecutions of sexual assault (a) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall include in the covered surveys a question regarding whether a member of an Armed Force under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of a military department would be more willing to report a sexual assault if prosecution decisions were made by lawyers and not commanders. (b) Covered surveys defined In this section, the term covered surveys (1) the Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Active Duty Members; (2) the Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of Reserve Component Members; (3) the Military Service Gender Relations Focus Group; and (4) any successor survey or focus group. 549A. Pilot program on prosecution of special victim offenses committed by attendees of military service academies (a) Pilot program Beginning not later than January 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program (referred to in this Act as the Pilot Program (1) review each covered special victim offense; and (2) determine whether such offense shall be referred to trial by an appropriate court-martial convening authority. (b) Office of the Chief Prosecutor (1) Establishment As part of the Pilot Program, the Secretary shall establish, within the Office of the Secretary of Defense, an Office of the Chief Prosecutor. (2) Head of Office The head of the Office shall be known as the Chief Prosecutor. The Secretary shall appoint as the Chief Prosecutor a commissioned officer in the grade of O–7 or above who— (A) has significant experience prosecuting sexual assault trials by court-martial; and (B) is outside the chain of command of any cadet or midshipman described in subsection (f)(2). (3) Responsibilities The Chief Prosecutor shall exercise the authorities described in subsection (c) but only with respect to covered special victim offenses. (4) Special rule Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the military service from which the Chief Prosecutor is appointed is authorized an additional billet for a general officer or a flag officer for each year in the two year period beginning with the year in which the appointment is made. (5) Termination The Office of the Chief Prosecutor shall terminate on the date on which the Pilot Program terminates under subsection (e). (c) Referral to Office of the Chief Prosecutor (1) Investigation phase (A) Notice and information A military criminal investigative organization that receives an allegation of a covered special victim offense shall provide to the Chief Prosecutor and the commander of the military service academy concerned— (i) timely notice of such allegation; and (ii) any information and evidence obtained as the result a subsequent investigation into the allegation. (B) Trial counsel A trial counsel assigned to a case involving a covered special victim offense shall, during the investigative phase of such case, provide the Chief Prosecutor with the information necessary to enable the Chief Prosecutor to make the determination required under paragraph (3). (2) Referral to Chief Prosecutor In the case of a charge relating to a covered special victim offense, in addition to referring the charge to the staff judge advocate under subsection (a) or (b) of section 834 of title 10, United States Code (article 34 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), the convening authority of the Armed Force of which the accused is a member shall refer, as soon as reasonably practicable, the charge to the Chief Prosecutor to make the determination required by paragraph (3). (3) Prosecutorial determination The Chief Prosecutor shall make a determination regarding whether a charge relating to a covered special victim offense shall be referred to trial. If the Chief Prosecutor makes a determination that the charge shall be tried by court-martial, the Chief Prosecutor also shall determine whether the charge shall be tried by a general court-martial convened under section 822 of title 10, United States Code (article 22 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) or a special court-martial convened under section 823 of such title (article 23 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). The determination of whether to try a charge relating to a covered special victim offense by court-martial shall include a determination of whether to try any known offenses, including any lesser included offenses. (4) Effect of determination and appeals process (A) Determination to proceed to trial Subject to subparagraph (C), a determination to try a charge relating to a covered special victim offense by court-martial under paragraph (3), and the determination as to the type of court-martial, shall be binding on any convening authority under chapter 47 (B) Determination not to proceed to trial Subject to subparagraph (C), a determination under paragraph (3) not to proceed to trial on a charge relating to a covered special victim offense by general or special court-martial shall be binding on any convening authority under chapter 47 (i) to proceed to trial by court-martial on charges of collateral misconducted related to the special victim offense; or (ii) to impose non-judicial punishment in connection with the conduct covered by the charge as authorized by section 815 of such title (article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). (C) Appeal In a case in which a convening authority and the staff judge advocate advising such authority disagree with the determination of the Chief Prosecutor under paragraph (3), the convening authority and staff judge advocate may jointly appeal the determination to the General Counsel of the Department of Defense. The determination of the General Counsel with respect to such appeal shall be binding on the Chief Prosecutor and the convening authority concerned. (5) Trial by randomized jury After the Chief Prosecutor makes a determination under paragraph (3) to proceed to trial on a charge relating to a covered special victim offense, the matter shall be tried by a court-martial convened within the Armed Force of which the accused is a member in accordance with the applicable provisions of chapter 47 (6) Unlawful influence or coercion The actions of the Chief Prosecutor under this subsection whether or not to try charges by court-martial shall be free of unlawful or unauthorized influence or coercion. (d) Effect on other law This section shall supersede any provision of chapter 47 (e) Termination and transition (1) Termination The authority of the Secretary to carry out the Pilot Program shall terminate four years after the date on which the Pilot Program is initiated. (2) Transition The Secretary shall take such actions as are necessary to ensure that, on the date on which the Pilot Program terminates under paragraph (1), any matter referred to the Chief Prosecutor under subsection (c)(2), but with respect to which the Chief Prosecutor has not made a determination under subsection (c)(3), shall be transferred to the appropriate convening authority for consideration. (f) Definitions In this Act: (1) The term Armed Force (2) The term covered special victim offense (A) alleged to have been committed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act by a cadet of the United States Military Academy or the United States Air Force Academy, without regard to the location at which the offense was committed; or (B) alleged to have been committed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act by a midshipman of the United States Naval Academy, without regard to the location at which the offense was committed. (3) The term Secretary (4) The term special victim offense (A) An offense under section 917a, 920, 920b, 920c, or 930 of title 10, United States Code (article 117a, 120, 120b, 120c, or 130 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). (B) A conspiracy to commit an offense specified in subparagraph (A) as punishable under section 881 of such title (article 81 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). (C) A solicitation to commit an offense specified in subparagraph (A) as punishable under section 882 of such title (article 82 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). (D) An attempt to commit an offense specified in subparagraph (A) as punishable under section 880 of such title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 549B. Report on status of investigations of alleged sex-related offenses (a) Reports required Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter through December 31, 2025, the Secretary of each military department shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of investigations into alleged sex-related offenses. (b) Elements Each report under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to investigations into alleged sex-related offenses carried out by military criminal investigative organizations under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned during the preceding year, the following: (1) The total number of investigations. (2) For each investigation— (A) the date the investigation was initiated; and (B) an explanation of whether the investigation is in-progress or complete as of the date of the report and, if complete, the date on which the investigation was completed. (3) The total number of investigations that are complete as of the date of the report. (4) The total number of investigations that are in-progress as of the date of the report. (5) For investigations lasting longer than 180 days, an explanation of the primary reasons for the extended duration of the investigation. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) The term alleged sex-related offense (2) The term complete F Member Education, Training, and Transition 551. Counseling in the Transition Assistance Program regarding sexual assault, sexual or gender harassment, and intimate partner violence Section 1142(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (20) Information concerning health care (including mental health care) furnished by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to veterans and members of the Armed Forces who have survived sexual assault, sexual or gender harassment, or intimate partner violence. . 552. Establishment of mentoring and career counseling program (a) In general Chapter 107 2158. Mentoring and career counseling program (a) Establishment; objectives The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments and the Chief Diversity Officer, shall implement a program for mentoring and career counseling that— (1) ensures that all military occupational specialties and career fields reflect the demographics of the armed forces; and (2) ensures that members in all ranks and grades reflect the demographics of the armed forces. (b) Program description and components The program under subsection (a) shall— (1) include mentoring and career counseling efforts that start prior to the initial career field decision point and continue throughout the career of each participating member; (2) provide guidance on accession into the military occupational specialties and career fields that experience the highest rates and greatest number of promotions to a grade above O–6; and (3) promote information regarding career choices, including opportunities in the reserve components, to optimize the ability of a participating member to make informed career choices from accession to retirement. (c) Evaluation metrics The Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of the program under this section. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 107 of such title is amended by at the end the following new item: 2158. Mentoring and career counseling program. . (c) Interim report (1) Report required Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the implementation of section 2158 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a). (2) Elements The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A description and assessment of the manner in which the Department of Defense shall implement the program under subsection (a) of such section 2158. (B) The initial evaluation metrics developed under subsection (c) of such section 2158. (C) An explanation of whether the program will be carried out as part of another program of the Department or through the establishment of a separate program. (D) A comprehensive description of the additional personnel, resources, and training that will be required to implement the program, including identification of the specific number of additional billets that will be needed to staff the program. (E) Recommendations of the Secretary for additional legislation that the Secretary determines e necessary to effectively and efficiently implement the program. (d) Annual report (1) Report required Not later than October 1, 2021, and annually thereafter for three years, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the program under section 2158 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a). (2) Elements Each report under paragraph (1) shall include, disaggregated by Armed Force, the following: (A) The latest evaluation metrics developed under subsection (c) of such section 2158. (B) The number of individuals, disaggregated by grade, ethnicity, race, and gender, who were eligible for participation in the program. (C) The number of individuals, disaggregated by grade, ethnicity, race, and gender, who opted out of participation in the program. (D) An assessment of the effectiveness of the program in advancing the careers of minority commissioned officers. (e) Publication The Secretary of Defense shall— (1) publish on an appropriate publicly available website of the Department of Defense the reports required under subsections (c) and (d); and (2) ensure that any data included with each such report is made available in a machine-readable format that is downloadable, searchable, and sortable. (f) Implementation date The Secretary of Defense shall implement the program under section 2158 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act. (g) Definitions In this section: (1) The term minority person (A) Asian American; (B) Native Hawaiian; (C) a Pacific Islander; (D) African American; (E) Hispanic; (F) Puerto Rican; (G) Native American; (H) an Alaska Native; or (I) female. (2) The term minority commissioned officer (3) The term machine-readable 553. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center (a) Authority to award bachelor’s degrees Section 2168 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the section heading, by striking Associate Associate or Bachelor (2) by amending subsection (a) to read as follows: (a) Subject to subsection (b), the Commandant of the Defense Language Institute may confer— (1) an Associate of Arts degree in a foreign language upon any graduate of the Foreign Language Center of the Institute who fulfills the requirements for that degree; or (2) a Bachelor of Arts degree in a foreign language upon any graduate of the Foreign Language Center of the Institute who fulfills the requirements for that degree. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 108 2168. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center: degree of Associate or Bachelor of Arts in foreign language. . 554. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center (a) Authority to award bachelor’s degrees Section 2168 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the section heading, by striking Associate Associate or Bachelor (2) by amending subsection (a) to read as follows: (a) Subject to subsection (b), the Commandant of the Defense Language Institute may confer— (1) an Associate of Arts degree in a foreign language upon any graduate of the Foreign Language Center of the Institute who fulfills the requirements for that degree; or (2) a Bachelor of Arts degree in a foreign language upon any graduate of the Foreign Language Center of the Institute who fulfills the requirements for that degree. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 108 2168. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center: degree of Associate or Bachelor of Arts in foreign language. . 555. Increase in number of permanent professors at the United States Air Force Academy Section 9431(b)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 23 25 556. Information on nominations and applications for military service academies (a) Congressional nominations portal (1) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in consultation with the Superintendents of the military service academies, shall ensure that there is a uniform online portal for all military service academies that enables Members of Congress to nominate individuals for appointment to each academy through a secure website. (2) Information collection and reporting The online portal established under paragraph (1) shall— (A) collect, from each Member of Congress, the demographic information described in subsection (b) for each individual nominated by the Member; and (B) collect the information required to be included in each annual report of the Secretary under subsection (c) in a manner that enables the Secretary to automatically compile such information when preparing the report. (3) Availability of information The portal shall allow Members of Congress and their designees to view past nomination records for all application cycles. (b) Standard classifications for collection of demographic data (1) Standards required The Secretary, in consultation with the Superintendents of the military service academies, shall establish standard classifications that cadets, midshipmen, and applicants to the academies may use to self-identify gender, race, and ethnicity and to provide other demographic information in connection with admission to or enrollment in an academy. (2) Consistency with OMB guidance The standard classifications established under paragraph (1) shall be consistent with the standard classifications specified in Office of Management and Budget Directive No. 15 (pertaining to race and ethnic standards for Federal statistics and administrative reporting) or any successor directive. (3) Incorporation into applications and records Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall incorporate the standard classifications established under paragraph (1) into— (A) applications for admission to the military service academies; and (B) the military personnel records of cadets and midshipmen enrolled in such academies. (c) Annual report on the demographics military service academy applicants (1) Report required Not later than September 30 of each year beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the demographics of applicants to military service academies for the most recently concluded application year. (2) Elements Each report under paragraph (1) shall include, with respect to each military service academy, the following: (A) The number of individuals who submitted an application for admission to the academy in the application year covered by the report. (B) Of the individuals who submitted an application for admission to the academy in such year— (i) the overall demographics of applicant pool, disaggregated by the classifications established under subsection (b) and by Member of Congress; (ii) the number and percentage who received a nomination, disaggregated by the classifications established under subsection (b) and by Member of Congress; (iii) the number and percentage who received an offer for appointment to the academy, disaggregated by the classifications established under subsection (b) and by Member of Congress; and (iv) the number and percentage who accepted an appointment to the academy, disaggregated by the classifications established under subsection (b) and by Member of Congress. (3) Consultation In preparing each report under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consult with the Superintendents of the military service academies. (4) Availability of reports and data The Secretary shall— (A) make the results of each report under paragraph (1) available on a publicly accessible website of the Department of Defense; and (B) ensure that any data included with the report is made available in a machine-readable format that is downloadable, searchable, and sortable. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) The term application year (2) The term congressional defense committees (3) The term machine-readable (4) The term military service academy (A) the United States Military Academy; (B) the United States Naval Academy; and (C) the United States Air Force Academy. (5) The term Secretary 557. Transformation of the professional military education enterprise (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that-- (1) professional military education is foundational to the development of ethical and effective military leaders and vital to national security; (2) oversight of professional military education is an essential part of Congress’ constitutional responsibilities to regulate and maintain the Armed Forces of the United States; (3) reform of the professional military education system, as directed by the congressional defense committees, has played a central role in the institutionalization of jointness as envisioned by the Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986 ( Public Law 99–433 (4) the Goldwater-Nichols professional military education model has served the Nation well since the end of the Cold War by enabling successful joint military operations across the spectrum of conflict; (5) recent changes in the national security environment require that the professional military education enterprise adapt to prepare the joint force to successfully defend American interests in evolving areas of strategic competition; (6) the Department of Defense must transform the professional military education enterprise to meet these challenges by emphasizing focused and rigorous intellectual study reflecting the hard won strategic insights of history, while leveraging advancements in the modern learning environment. (b) Limitation None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended consolidate, close, or significantly change the curriculum of the National Defense University or any institution of professional military education of an Armed Force until a period of 120 days has elapsed following the date on which the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness submits the report required under subsection (c). (c) Report required (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the status of the professional military education enterprise. (2) Elements The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A consolidated summary that— (i) lists all components of the professional military education enterprise of the Department of Defense, including all associated schools, programs, research centers, and support activities; and (ii) for each such component, identifies the assigned personnel strength, annual student throughput, and budget details covering the period of three fiscal years preceding the date of the report. (B) An assessment of the effectiveness and shortfalls of the existing professional military education enterprise as measured against graduate utilization, post-graduate evaluations, and the education and force development requirements of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Chiefs of the Armed Forces. (C) Recommendations to improve the intellectual readiness of the joint force through reforms designed to— (i) improve the warfighting readiness, intellectual fitness and cognitive ingenuity of military leaders; (ii) promote development of strategic thinkers capable of developing integrated political-military and cross-domain strategies and new doctrinal concepts; (iii) enhance the effectiveness, coherence, and efficiency of individual service approaches to professional military education; (iv) improve the depth and rigor of professional military education curriculum in alignment with national defense strategy pacing threats while enhancing strategic relationships and operational integration with key allies and international security partners; and (v) foster the deliberate development of world-class faculty through increasing the value of faculty assignments and other appropriate measures. 558. College of International Security Affairs of the National Defense University (a) Prohibition The Secretary of Defense may not eliminate, divest, downsize, or reorganize the College of International Security Affairs, nor its satellite program, the Joint Special Operations Masters of Arts, of the National Defense University, or seek to reduce the number of students educated at the College, or its satellite program, until 30 days after the date on which the congressional defense committees receive the report required by subsection (c). (b) Assessment, determination, and review The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations/Low-Intensity Conflict , the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Counternarcotics and Global Threats, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Stability and Humanitarian Affairs, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Combating Terrorism, the Chief Financial Officer of the Department, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Commander of United States Special Operations Command, shall— (1) assess requirements for joint professional military education and civilian leader education in the counterterrorism, irregular warfare, and asymmetrical domains to support the Department and other national security institutions of the Federal Government; (2) determine whether the importance, challenges, and complexity of the modern counterterrorism environment and irregular and asymmetrical domains warrant— (A) a college at the National Defense University, or a college independent of the National Defense University whose leadership is responsible to the Office of the Secretary of Defense; and (B) the provision of resources, services, and capacity at levels that are the same as, or decreased or enhanced in comparison to, those resources, services, and capacity in place at the College of International Security Affairs on January 1, 2019; (3) review the plan proposed by the National Defense University for eliminating the College of International Security Affairs and reducing and restructuring the counterterrorism, irregular, and asymmetrical faculty, course offerings, joint professional military education and degree and certificate programs, and other services provided by the College; and (4) assess the changes made to the College of International Security Affairs since January 1, 2019, and the actions necessary to reverse those changes, including relocating the College and its associated budget, faculty, staff, students, and facilities outside of the National Defense University. (c) Report required Not later than February 1, 2021, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on— (1) the findings of the Secretary with respect to the assessments, determination, and review conducted under subsection (b); and (2) such recommendations as the Secretary may have for higher education in the counterterrorism, irregular, and asymmetrical domains. 559. Public-private consortium to improve professional military education (a) Establishment The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall establish and maintain a public-private consortium (referred to in this section as the Consortium (b) Directors (1) In general The President of the National Defense University and the head of a civilian institution of higher education appointed in accordance with paragraph (3) shall serve as co-directors of the Consortium. (2) Responsibilities of co-directors The co-directors shall be responsible for— (A) the administration and management of the Consortium; and (B) developing a common curriculum for professional military education using input received from members of the Consortium. (3) Appointment of co-director from civilian institution Not later than June 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall appoint an individual who is the President or Chancellor of a civilian institution of higher education to serve as co-director of the Consortium as described in paragraph (1). (4) Term of co-director The co-director appointed under paragraph (3) shall serve an initial term of five years. The Secretary of Defense may reappoint such co-director for one or more additional terms of not more than five years, as the Secretary determines appropriate. (5) Authority In the event that a conflict arises between co-directors of the Consortium, the conflict shall be resolved by the Director for Joint Force Development of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (J-7). (c) Activities of Consortium The Consortium shall carry out the following activities: (1) Bring the military education system (including military service academies, institutions that provide professional military education, and other institutions the provide military education) together with a broad group of civilian institutions of higher education, policy research institutes, and the commercial sector to develop and continually update a research-based curriculum to prepare early career, mid-career, and senior military officers and civilian employees of the Federal Government to succeed in an era that will be predominantly defined by great power competition and in which security challenges will transcend the traditional areas of defense expertise, becoming more complex and inter-related than before, with disruptions that will manifest rapidly and with little warning. (2) Train military officers and civilian educators serving in the joint professional military education system to implement the curriculum developed under paragraph (2) at the institutions they serve. (3) On a regular basis, make recommendations to the Secretary about how the joint professional military education system should be modified to meet the challenges of apparent or possible future defense, national security, and international environments. (d) Members The Consortium shall be composed of representatives selected by the Secretary of Defense from the following organizations: (1) Organizations within the joint professional military education system. (2) Military service academies. (3) Other institutions of the Federal Government that provide military education. (4) Civilian institutions of higher education. (5) Private sector and government policy research institutes. (6) Organizations in the commercial sector, including organizations from the industrial, finance, and technology sectors. (e) Annual report Not later than September 30, 2022, and annually thereafter, the co-directors of the Consortium shall submit to the Secretary of Defense and the congressional defense committees a report that describes the activities carried out by the Consortium during the preceding year. (f) Civilian institution defined In this section, the term civilian institution of higher education 20 U.S.C. 1001 G Military Family Readiness and Dependents’ Education 561. Family readiness: definitions; communication strategy; report (a) Definitions Not later than six months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall define the terms military family readiness military family resiliency (b) Communication strategy Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall establish and implement a strategy regarding communication with military families. The strategy shall include the following: (1) The use of a variety of modes of communication to ensure the broadest means of communicating with military families. (2) Updating an existing annual standardized survey that assesses military family readiness to address the following issues: (A) Communication with beneficiaries. (B) Child care. (C) Education, (D) Spousal employment. (E) The Exceptional Family Member Program. (F) Financial literacy. (G) Financial stress. (H) Health care (including copayments, network adequacy, and the availability of appointments with health care providers). (c) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report regarding the feasibility of implementing the recommendations in— (1) chapter 3 of the report of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020, Ensuring Wellness and Wellbeing of Service-Members and their Families (2) the report, dated July 2019, of the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine, titled Strengthening the Military Family Readiness System for a Changing American Society 562. Support services for members of special operations forces and immediate family members (a) In general Section 1788a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the heading— (A) by striking Family support Support (B) by striking immediate family members of (C) by adding ; immediate family members (2) in subsection (a), by striking for the immediate family members of members of the armed forces assigned to special operations forces (3) in subsection (b)(1)— (A) by striking the immediate family members (B) by inserting and the immediate family members of such members (4) in subsection (d)(2)— (A) in subparagraph (A)— (i) by striking family members of (ii) by inserting and immediate family members of such members (B) in subparagraph (B)— (i) by striking and on family members of (ii) by inserting , and immediate family members of such members (5) in subsection (e)(4)— (A) by inserting psychological support, spiritual support, and costs (B) by striking immediate family members of (C) by inserting (including the reserve components) members of the armed forces (D) by inserting , and immediate family members of such members, while (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 88 1788a. Support programs: members of special operations forces; immediate family members . 563. Authority to provide financial assistance to certain in-home child care providers for members of the Armed Forces and survivors of members who die in combat in the line of duty (a) Authority Section 1798 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting , or to an in-home child care provider, youth program services (2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and (3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c): (c) Eligible in-home child care providers The Secretary may determine that an in-home child care provider is eligible for financial assistance under this section. . (b) In-home child care provider defined Section 1800 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following: (5) The term in-home child care provider . (c) Regulations Not later than July 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations that establish eligibility requirements and amounts of financial assistance for an in-home child care provider under subsection (c) of section 1798 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a). 564. Expansion of financial assistance under My Career Advancement Account program Section 580F of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (1) by inserting or maintenance (including continuing education courses) pursuit (2) by adding at the end the following: Such financial assistance may be applied to the costs of national tests that may earn a participating military spouse course credits required for a degree approved under the program (including the College Level Examination Program tests and the Subject Standardized Tests of the Defense Activity for Non-Traditional Education Support Division of the Department of Defense). 565. Child care (a) 24-hour child care If the Secretary of Defense determines it feasible, the Secretary shall furnish child care to each child of a member of the Armed Forces or employee of the Department of Defense while that member or employee works on rotating shifts at a military installation. (b) Metrics Not later than six months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of the child care priority system of the Department of Defense, including— (1) the speed of placement for children of members of the Armed Forces on active duty; (2) the type of child care offered; (3) available spaces in such system, if any; and (4) other metrics to monitor the child care priority system determined by the Secretary. (c) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report regarding the results of a study that evaluates— (1) the sufficiency of the stipend furnished by the Secretary to members of the Armed Forces for civilian child care; and (2) whether the amount of such stipend should be based on— (A) cost of living in the applicable locale; and (B) the capacity of licensed civilian child care providers in the local market. 566. Continuation of paid parental leave upon death of child Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall amend the regulations prescribed pursuant to subsections (i) and (j) of section 701 of title 10, United States Code, to provide that the eligibility of primary and secondary caregivers for paid parental leave that has already been approved shall not terminate upon the death of the child for whom such leave is taken. 567. Study and report on the performance of the Department of Defense Education Activity (a) Study The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study on the performance of the Department of Defense Education Activity. (b) Elements The study under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A review of the curriculum relating to health, resiliency, and nutrition taught in schools operated by the Department of Defense Education Activity and a comparison of such curriculum to appropriate education benchmarks. (2) An analysis of the outcomes experienced by students in such schools, as measured by— (A) the performance of such students on the National Assessment of Educational Progress carried out under section 303(b)(3) of the National Assessment of Educational Progress Authorization Act ( 20 U.S.C. 9622(b)(3) (B) any other methodologies used by the Department of Defense Education Activity to measure individual student outcomes. (3) An assessment of the effectiveness of the School Liaison Officer program of the Department of Defense Education Activity in achieving the goals of the program with an emphasis on goals relating to special education and family outreach. (c) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report that includes the findings of the study conducted under subsection (a). 568. Comptroller General of the United States report on the structural condition of Department of Defense Education Activity schools (a) Report required Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth an assessment by the Comptroller General of the structural condition of schools of the Department of Defense Education Activity, both within the continental United States (CONUS) and outside the continental United States (OCONUS). (b) Virtual schools The report shall include an assessment of the virtual infrastructure or other means by which students attend Department of Defense Education Activity schools that have no physical structure, including the satisfaction of the military families concerned with such infrastructure or other means. 569. Pilot program to expand eligibility for enrollment at domestic dependent elementary and secondary schools (a) Pilot program authorized Beginning not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program under which a dependent of a full-time, active-duty member of the Armed Forces may enroll in a covered DODEA school at the military installation to which the member is assigned, on a space-available basis as described in subsection (c), without regard to whether the member resides on the installation as described in 2164(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code. (b) Purposes The purposes of the pilot program under this section are— (1) to evaluate the feasibility and advisability of expanding enrollment in covered DODEA schools; and (2) to determine how increased access to such schools will affect military and family readiness. (c) Enrollment on space-available basis A student participating in the pilot program under this section may be enrolled in a covered DODEA school only if the school has the capacity to accept the student, as determined by the Director of the Department of Defense Education Activity. (d) Locations The Secretary of Defense shall carry out the pilot program under this section at not more than four military installations at which covered DODEA schools are located. The Secretary shall select military installations for participation in the program based on— (1) the readiness needs of the Secretary of a the military department concerned; and (2) the capacity of the DODEA schools located at the installation to accept additional students, as determined by the Director of the Department of Defense Education Activity. (e) Termination The authority to carry out the pilot program under this section shall terminate four years after the date of the enactment of this Act. (f) Covered DODEA school defined In this Section, the term covered DODEA school (1) has been established on or before the date of the enactment of this Act; and (2) is located in the continental United States. 569A. Continued assistance to schools with significant numbers of military dependent students (a) Assistance to schools with significant numbers of military dependent students Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 in division D of this Act and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301 of this Act, $40,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 ( Public Law 109–163 20 U.S.C. 7703b (b) Impact aid for children with severe disabilities Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 in division D of this Act and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301 of this Act, $10,000,000 shall be available for payments under section 363 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 ( Public Law 106–398 20 U.S.C. 7703a (c) Local educational agency defined In this section, the term local educational agency 20 U.S.C. 7713(9) 569B. Standardization of the Exceptional Family Member Program (a) Policy Not later than six months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall, to the extent practicable, standardize the Exceptional Family Member Program (in this section referred to as the EFMP (b) Elements The EFMP, standardized under subsection (a), shall include the following: (1) Processes for the identification and enrollment of dependents of covered members with special needs. (2) A process for the permanent change of orders for covered members, to ensure seamless continuity of services at the new permanent duty station. (3) A review process for installations to ensure that health care furnished through the TRICARE program, special needs education programs, and installation-based family support programs are available to military families enrolled in the EFMP. (4) A standardized respite care benefit across the covered Armed Forces, including the number of hours available under such benefit to military families enrolled in the EFMP. (5) Outcomes and metrics to evaluate the EFMP. (6) A requirement that the Secretary of each military department provide a dedicated EFMP attorney, who specializes in education law, at each military installation— (A) the Secretary determines is a primary receiving installation for military families with special needs; and (B) in a State that the Secretary determines has historically not supported families enrolled in the EFMP. (7) The option for a family enrolled in the EFMP to continue to receive all services under that program and the bachelor allowance for housing if— (A) the covered member receives a new permanent duty station; and (B) the covered member and family elect for the family not to relocate with the covered member. (8) A process to discuss policy challenges and opportunities, best practices adopted across the covered Armed Forces, a forum period for discussion with members of military families with special needs, and other matters the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate. (c) Case management The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall develop an EFMP case management model, including the following: (1) A single EFMP office, located at the headquarters of each covered Armed Force, to oversee implementation of the EFMP and coordinate health care services, permanent change of station order processing, and educational support services for that covered Armed Force. (2) An EFMP office at each military installation with case managers to assist each family of a covered member in the development of a plan that addresses the areas specified in subsection (b)(1). (d) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the implementation of the items identified under subsections (a), (b), and (c), including any recommendations of the Secretary regarding legislation. (e) GAO Report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on— (1) whether military families have higher rates of disputes and loss of free and appropriate public education under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ( Public Law 93–112 29 U.S.C. 794 (2) an analysis of the number of due process hearings that were filed by school districts against children of members of the Armed Forces. (f) Definitions In this section: (1) The term covered Armed Force (2) The term covered member (A) of a covered Armed Force; and (B) with a dependent with special needs. H Diversity and Inclusion 571. Diversity and inclusion reporting requirements (a) Standard diversity metrics and annual reporting requirement Section 113 of title 10, United States Code is amended— (1) in subsection (c)— (A) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and (B) by inserting after paragraph (1), the following new paragraph (2): (2) a report from each military department on the goals, barriers, and status of diversity and inclusion of that military department; ; and (2) in subsection (g)(1)(B), by inserting after clause (vi), the following new clause (vii): (vii) Strategic metrics and benchmarks evaluating how the officer and enlisted corps reflects the eligible United States population across all armed forces and ranks. ; (3) by redesignating subsections (m) and (n) as subsections (n) and (o), respectively; and (4) by inserting after subsection (k), the following new subsections (l) and (m): (l) (1) The Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain a standard set of strategic metrics and benchmarks toward objectives of: (A) an officer and enlisted corps that reflects the eligible U.S. population across all armed forces and ranks; and (B) a military force that is able to prevail in its wars, prevent and deter conflict, defeat adversaries and succeed in a wide range of contingencies, and preserve and enhance the all-volunteer force. (2) In implementing the requirement in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall— (A) establish a universal data collection system to ensure comparability across each military department; (B) establish standard definitions of demographic groups, a common methodology, and a common reporting structure across each military department; (C) conduct annual barrier analyses to review demographic diversity patterns across the military life cycle, starting with accessions; and (D) each year meet with the Secretaries of the military departments, the Chiefs of Staff of the armed forces, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to assess progress towards the objective under paragraph (1) and establish recommendations to meet such objective. (m) The Secretary shall include in each national defense strategy under subsection (g)— (1) the demographics, disaggregated by grade, ethnicity, race, gender, and military occupational specialty, for— (A) accession into the armed forces; (B) the enlisted corps; (C) the commissioned officers; (D) graduates of the military service academies; (E) the rate of promotion in the promotion zone; (F) the rate of promotion below the zone for promotion; (G) the rates of retention; (H) command selection; (I) special assignments; (J) career broadening assignments; (K) aides to general officers and flag officers; and (L) any other matter the Secretary determines appropriate; (2) an analysis of assignment patterns by ethnicity, race, and gender; (3) an analysis of attitudinal survey data by ethnicity, race, and gender; (4) an assessment of the available pool of qualified of Asian American, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, African American, Hispanic, Puerto Rican, Native American, Alaska Native and female candidates for pay grades O–9 and O–10; (5) identification of persistent, group-specific deviations from overall averages and plans to investigate underlying causes; and (6) summaries of progress made on previous actions. . (b) National Guard diversity reporting Section 10504 of title 10, United States Code is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection (d): (d) Report on diversity and inclusion (1) In general Not less than once every four years, the Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall report in writing to the Secretary of Defense and the Congress on the status of diversity in each State, Territory, and the District of Columbia for all ranks of the Army and Air National Guard. (2) Elements Each report under paragraph (1) shall include— (A) the demographics, disaggregated by State, grade, ethnicity, race, gender, and military occupational specialty, for— (i) accession into the National Guard; (ii) the enlisted corps; (iii) the commissioned officers; (iv) the rate of promotion in the promotion zone; (v) the rate of promotion below the zone for promotion; (vi) the rates of retention; (vii) command selection; (viii) special assignments; (ix) career broadening assignments; (x) aides to a general officer; and (xi) any other matter the Chief of the National Guard Bureau determines appropriate; (B) an analysis of assignment patterns by ethnicity, race, and gender; (C) an analysis of attitudinal survey data by ethnicity, race, and gender; (D) an assessment of the available pool of qualified of Asian American, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, African American, Hispanic, Puerto Rican, Native American, Alaska Native and female candidates for pay grades O–9 and O–10; (E) identification of persistent, group-specific deviations from overall averages and plans to investigate underlying causes; and (F) summaries of progress made on previous actions. (3) Public availability The Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall— (A) publish on an appropriate publicly available website of the National Guard the reports required under paragraph (1); and (B) ensure that any data included with the report is made available in a machine-readable format that is downloadable, searchable, and sortable. . (c) Coast Guard diversity reporting Section 5101 of title 14, United States Code is amended— (1) in subsection (b)— (A) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and (B) by inserting after paragraph (1), the following new paragraph (2): (2) the goals, barriers, and status of diversity and inclusion; ; and (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection (c): (c) Not less than once every four years, the Secretary shall include in the annual request under subsection (a)— (1) the demographics, disaggregated by grade, ethnicity, race, gender, and military occupational specialty, for— (A) accession into the Coast Guard; (B) the enlisted corps; (C) the commissioned officers; (D) graduates of the Coast Guard Academy; (E) the rate of promotion in the promotion zone; (F) the rate of promotion below the zone for promotion; (G) the rates of retention; (H) command selection; (I) special assignments; (J) career broadening assignments; (K) aides to a flag officer; and (L) any other matter the Secretary determines appropriate; (2) an analysis of assignment patterns by ethnicity, race, and gender; (3) an analysis of attitudinal survey data by ethnicity, race, and gender; (4) an assessment of the available pool of qualified of Asian American, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, African American, Hispanic, Puerto Rican, Native American, Alaska Native and female candidates for pay grades O–9 and O–10; (5) identification of persistent, group-specific deviations from overall averages and plans to investigate underlying causes; and (6) summaries of progress made on previous actions. . (d) Requirement to Consider Minority Officers for O–9 and O–10 Grades (1) Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Space Force Section 601 of title 10, United States Code is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections: (e) The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall consider all Asian American, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, African American, Hispanic, Puerto Rican, Native American, Alaska Native and female candidates prior to recommending to the President an initial appointment to the grade of lieutenant general or vice admiral, or an initial appointment to the grade of general or admiral. (f) When seeking the advice and consent of the Senate under subsection (a), the President shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate a certification that— (1) all Asian American, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, African American, Hispanic, Puerto Rican, Native American, Alaska Native and female candidates were considered for appointment; and (2) (A) none of the candidates under subparagraph (A) met the qualifications needed by an officer serving in that position or office to carry out effectively the duties and responsibilities of that position or office; or (B) the officers in the positions designated under subsection (a) represent the diversity of the armed forces to the extent practicable. . (2) Coast Guard Section 305(a) of title 14, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (4) The Commandant shall consider all Asian American, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, African American, Hispanic, Puerto Rican, Native American, Alaska Native and female candidates prior to recommending to the President an initial appointment to the grade of vice admiral, or an initial appointment to the grade of admiral. (5) When seeking the advice and consent of the Senate under subsection (a), the President shall submit to the committee of the Senate with jurisdiction over the department in which the Coast Guard is operating a certification that— (A) all Asian American, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, African American, Hispanic, Puerto Rican, Native American, Alaska Native and female candidates were considered for appointment; and (B) (i) none of the candidates under subparagraph (A) met the qualifications needed by an officer serving in that position or office to carry out effectively the duties and responsibilities of that position or office; or (ii) the officers in the positions designated under subsection (a) represent the diversity of the armed forces to the extent practicable. . 572. Establishment of Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Council of the Department of Defense (a) Establishment Chapter 7 186. Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Council (a) Establishment The Secretary of the Department of Defense (referred to in this section as the Secretary Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Council of the Department of Defense Council (b) Duties The Council shall provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary on matters concerning diversity and inclusion in the Department of Defense, relating to the following: (1) Aligning diversity and inclusion with the strategic goals of the Department of Defense. (2) Conducting strategic outreach efforts to identify, attract, and recruit individuals that represent the demographic diversity of the United States. (3) Developing, mentoring, and retaining a diverse and inclusive Armed Forces. (4) Encouraging leadership development through diversity and inclusion practices and processes. (c) Membership (1) In general The Council shall be composed of not fewer than 22 members, including the Federal officials and officers specified in paragraph (2), and not fewer than 12 members appointed by the Secretary from nongovernmental positions described in paragraph (3). (2) Federal officials and officers The Federal officials and officers specified in this paragraph are the following: (A) The Chief Diversity Officer of the Department of Defense. (B) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness. (C) The Chief of Staff of the Army. (D) The Chief of Naval Operations. (E) The Chief of Staff of the Air Force. (F) The Chief of Space Operations. (G) The Chief of Staff of the Air Force. (H) The Commandant of the Marine Corps. (I) The Commandant of the Coast Guard. (J) The Chief of the National Guard Bureau. (3) Nongovernmental positions Nongovernmental positions described in this paragraph are the following: (A) Five presidents or chancellors of institutions of higher education, including private and public institutions representing diverse areas of the United States. (B) Senior leaders of the defense industries of the United States. (C) Senior leaders of veterans or military service organizations. (D) Veterans (as defined in section 101 of title 38). (E) Others determined appropriate by the Secretary. (4) Timing of appointments Appointments to the Council shall be made not later than for months after the date of the enactment of this Act. (5) Terms (A) In general Each member shall be appointed for a term of two years. (B) Vacancies Any member appointed to fill a vacancy occurring before the expiration of the term for which the member’s predecessor was appointed shall be appointed only for the remainder of that term. A member may serve after the expiration of that term until a successor has been appointed. (6) Chairperson and Vice Chairperson (A) Chairperson The Chairperson of the Council shall be the Chief Diversity Officer of the Department of Defense. (B) Vice Chairperson The Vice Chairperson shall be designated by the Secretary at the time of the appointment of the members pursuant to paragraph (4), and when a vacancy of the Vice Chairperson occurs, as the case may be. (d) Meeting (1) Meetings The Council shall meet not fewer than four times each year at the call of the Chairperson or Vice Chairperson. (2) Quorum Twelve members of the Council, including six appointed under subsection (c)(2) and six appointed under subsection (c)(3), shall constitute a quorum. (e) Compensation (1) Prohibition on compensation Except as provided in paragraph (2), members of the Council may not receive additional pay, allowances, or benefits by reason of their service on the Council. (2) Travel expenses Each member shall receive travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, in accordance with applicable provisions under subchapter I of chapter 57 (f) Administrative support services Upon the request of the Council, the Secretary shall provide to the Council, on a reimbursable basis, the administrative support services necessary for the Council to carry out its responsibilities under this Act. (g) Reports Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Council holds its initial meeting under subsection (d) and annually thereafter, the Council shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing a detailed statement of the advice and recommendations of the Council pursuant to subsection (b). . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 186. Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Council. . 573. Establishment of Special Inspector General for Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Armed Forces; amendments to Inspector General Act (a) Special Inspector General for Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Armed Forces (1) Purposes The purposes of this section are the following: (A) To provide for the independent and objective conduct and supervision of audits and investigations relating to racial and ethnic disparities in military personnel and military justice systems, and white supremacy among military personnel. (B) To provide recommendations to the Secretary of Defense and to Congress on actions necessary to eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in military personnel and military justice systems. (2) Office of Inspector General To carry out the purposes of paragraph (1), there is hereby established, in the Department of Defense, the Office of the Special Inspector General for Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Armed Forces. (3) Appointment of Inspector General (A) Nomination; appointment The head of the Office of the Special Inspector General for Racial and Ethnic Disparities is the Special Inspector General for Racial and Ethnic Disparities (in this section referred to as the Inspector General (B) Qualifications The appointment of the Inspector General shall be made solely on the basis of integrity and demonstrated ability in accounting, auditing, financial analysis, law, management analysis, public administration, or investigations. (C) Deadline for nomination The nomination of an individual as Inspector General shall be made not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (D) Compensation The annual rate of basic pay of the Inspector General shall be the annual rate of basic pay provided for positions at level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5, United States Code. (E) Prohibition on political activities For purposes of section 7324 of title 5, United States Code, the Inspector General shall not be considered an employee who determines policies to be pursued by the United States in the nationwide administration of Federal law. (F) Removal The Inspector General shall be removable from office in accordance with the provisions of section 3(b) (4) Assistant Inspectors General The Inspector General shall, in accordance with applicable laws and regulations governing the civil service, appoint an Assistant Inspector General for Military Justice who shall have the responsibility for auditing and investigation activities relating to racial and ethnic disparities within the military justice system. (5) Supervision (A) In general Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the Inspector General shall report directly to, and be under the general supervision of the Secretary of Defense. (B) Independence to conduct investigations and audits No officer of the Department of Defense shall prevent or prohibit the Inspector General from initiating, carrying out, or completing any audit or investigation related to racial and ethnic disparities or from issuing any subpoena during the course of any such audit or investigation. (6) Duties (A) Oversight of military justice It shall be the duty of the Inspector General to conduct, supervise, and coordinate audits and investigations of— (i) the effect of military justice policies and practices on racial and ethnic disparities, including overrepresentation of minorities in actions related to investigations, courts-martial, nonjudicial punishments, and other military justice actions as determined by the Inspector General; (ii) the effect of military personnel policies and practices, including recruiting, accessions, and promotions, on racial and ethnic disparities, including underrepresentation of minorities among members of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of a military department in grades above E–7; (iii) the scope and efficacy of existing diversity and inclusion offices and programs within the Department of Defense; and (iv) white supremacist activities among military personnel and any other issues, determined by the Inspector General, necessary to address racial and ethnic disparities within the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of a military department. (B) Other duties related to oversight The Inspector General shall establish, maintain, and oversee such systems, procedures, and controls as the Inspector General considers appropriate to discharge the duties under subparagraph (A). (C) Duties and responsibilities under Inspector General Act of 1978 In addition to the duties specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B), the Inspector General shall also have the duties and responsibilities of inspectors general under the Inspector General Act of 1978. (D) Coordination of efforts In carrying out the duties, responsibilities, and authorities of the Inspector General under this section, the Inspector General shall coordinate with, and receive the cooperation of each of the following: (i) The Inspector General of the Department of Defense. (ii) The Inspector General of the Army. (iii) The Inspector General of the Navy. (iv) The Inspector General of the Air Force. (7) Powers and authorities (A) Authorities under Inspector General Act of 1978 In carrying out the duties specified in paragraph (6), the Inspector General shall have the authorities provided in section 6 of the Inspector General Act of 1978. (B) Audit standards The Inspector General shall carry out the duties specified in paragraph (6)(A) in accordance with section 4(b)(1) of the Inspector General Act of 1978. (8) Personnel, facilities, and other resources (A) Personnel The Inspector General may select, appoint, and employ such officers and employees as may be necessary for carrying out the duties of the Inspector General, subject to the provisions of title 5, United States Code, governing appointments in the competitive service, and the provisions of chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of such title, relating to classification and General Schedule pay rates. (B) Employment of experts and consultants The Inspector General may obtain services as authorized by section 3109 of title 5, United States Code, at daily rates not to exceed the equivalent rate prescribed for grade GS–15 of the General Schedule by section 5332 of such title. (C) Contracting authority To the extent and in such amounts as may be provided in advance by appropriations Acts, the Inspector General may enter into contracts and other arrangements for audits, studies, analyses, and other services with public agencies and with private persons, and make such payments as may be necessary to carry out the duties of the Inspector General. (D) Resources The Secretary of Defense, as appropriate, shall provide the Inspector General with appropriate and adequate office space at appropriate locations of the Department of Defense, together with such equipment, office supplies, and communications facilities and services as may be necessary for the operation of such offices, and shall provide necessary maintenance services for such offices and the equipment and facilities located therein. (E) Assistance from Federal agencies (i) In general Upon request of the Inspector General for information or assistance from any department, agency, or other entity of the Federal Government, the head of such entity shall, insofar as is practicable and not in contravention of any existing law, furnish such information or assistance to the Inspector General, or an authorized designee. (ii) Reporting of refused assistance Whenever information or assistance requested by the Inspector General is, in the judgment of the Inspector General, unreasonably refused or not provided, the Inspector General shall report the circumstances to the Secretary of Defense, as appropriate, and to the appropriate congressional committees without delay. (9) Reports (A) Quarterly reports Not later than 30 days after the end of each fiscal-year quarter, the Inspector General shall submit quarterly reports to the Secretary of Defense and the congressional defense committees summarizing the activities of the Inspector General for the previous quarter. (B) Annual reports The Inspector General shall submit annual reports to the Secretary of Defense and the congressional defense committees presenting recommendations for changes to policy, practice, regulation, and statute to eliminate disparities within the military personnel and military justice systems and to eliminate white supremacist activities among military personnel. (C) Occasional reports The Inspector General shall, from time to time, submit additional reports containing findings and recommendations at the discretion of the Inspector General. (D) Online publication The Inspector General shall publish each report under this paragraph on a publicly available website not later than seven days after submission to the Secretary of Defense and the congressional defense committees. (10) Funding This section shall be carried out using not more than $10,000,000 of funds authorized to be appropriated in this Act for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide, and no additional amounts are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section. (b) Amendments to the Inspector General Act The Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended— (1) in section 3(b)— (A) by inserting (1) An Inspector General (B) by inserting after the first sentence the following: An Inspector General may only be removed by the President before the expiration of the term of the Inspector General for permanent incapacity, neglect of duty, malfeasance, conviction of a felony or conduct involving moral turpitude, knowing violation of a law, gross mismanagement, gross waste of funds, or abuse of authority. (C) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (2) If an Inspector General is removed by the President under paragraph (1) fewer than 30 days after the President has communicated in writing the reasons for such removal pursuant to paragraph (1), the Inspector General shall submit to the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency a report that includes the following information: (A) A description of the facts and circumstances of each investigation involving a senior government employee (as defined in section 5 of this Act) being conducted by that Inspector General at the time of such removal. (B) Any other matter that the Inspector General determines to include. (3) Any individual serving as the head of an Office of Inspector General, after the removal of an Inspector General under paragraph (1), shall issue to the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency a report identifying any instances in which an investigation or matter described in paragraph (2) is closed prior to its completion, with a description of the reasons for closing the investigation or matter. ; and (2) in section 8G(e), by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) In the event of the removal of an Inspector General, the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency shall— (A) investigate the reasons for removal provided by the President; (B) publish a report including the determination of the Council whether the reasons described in subparagraph (A) are in accordance with the relevant provisions relating to for cause removal; (C) review any investigation that was being conducted by the Inspector General at the time of such removal; and (D) submit, to the congressional committees the Council determine to be relevant, a report that includes the determination of the Council whether an investigation described in subparagraph (C) motivated such removal. . 574. Questions regarding racism, anti-Semitism, and supremacism in workplace surveys administered by the Secretary of Defense Section 593 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 , racist, anti-Semitic, or supremacist extremist 575. Report on demographics of officers appointed to certain grades Not later than the first October 1 to occur after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, each Secretary of a military department shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report summarizing the gender and race of each individual who received an appointment under section 531 or 601 of title 10, United States Code, during the immediately preceding fiscal year. 576. Plans to increase female and minority representation in the Armed Forces (a) Plans required The Secretary of Defense and each Secretary of a military department shall develop plans to increase, with respect to female and minority members of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of that Secretary, the following: (1) Recruitment. (2) Retention. (3) Representation in grades above E–7. (b) Elements Each plan developed under this section shall include clearly defined goals, performance measures, and timeframes. (c) Goals A goal under subsection (b) shall be to exceed, by not less than 100 percent, the rate at which the number of members described in subsection (a)(3) increased during the five years immediately preceding the date of the enactment of this Act. (d) Submittal Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and each Secretary of a military department shall submit to the committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a copy of each plan developed under this section by that Secretary. (e) Report Three months after submitting a plan under subsection (d) and quarterly thereafter for five years, the Secretary of Defense and each Secretary of a military department shall submit to the committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report indicating the number of female and minority members in grades above E–7 in each Armed Force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary. 577. Evaluation of barriers to minority participation in certain units of the Armed Forces (a) Study required (1) In general Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall seek to enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development center with relevant expertise to conduct an evaluation of the barriers to minority participation in covered units of the Armed Forces. (2) Elements The evaluation required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: (A) A description of the racial, ethnic, and gender composition of covered units. (B) A comparison of the participation rates of minority populations in covered units to participation rates of the general population as members and as officers of the Armed Forces. (C) A comparison of the percentage of minority officers in the grade of O–7 or higher who have served in each covered unit to such percentage for all such officers in the Armed Force of that covered unit. (D) An identification of barriers to minority participation in the accession, assessment, and training processes. (E) The status and effectiveness of the response to the recommendations contained in the report of the RAND Corporation titled Barriers to Minority Participation in Special Operations Forces (F) Recommendations to increase the numbers of minority officers in the Armed Forces. (G) Recommendations to increase minority participation in covered units. (H) Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate. (3) Report to Congress The Secretary shall— (A) submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the study by not later than January 1, 2022; and (B) provide interim briefings to such committees upon request. (b) Designation The study conducted under subsection (a) shall be known as the Study on Reducing Barriers to Minority Participation in Elite Units in the Armed Services (c) Implementation required (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (2), not later than March 1, 2023, the Secretary of Defense shall commence the implementation of each recommendation included in the final report submitted under subsection (a)(3). (2) Exceptions (A) Delayed implementation The Secretary of Defense may commence implementation of a recommendation described paragraph (1) later than March 1, 2023, if— (i) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees, not later than January 1, 2023, written notice of the intent of the Secretary to delay implementation of the recommendation; and (ii) includes, as part of such notice, a specific justification for the delay in implementing the recommendation. (B) Nonimplementation The Secretary of Defense may elect not to implement a recommendation described in paragraph (1), if— (i) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees, not later than January 1, 2023, written notice of the intent of the Secretary not to implement the recommendation; and (ii) includes, as part of such notice— (I) the reasons for the Secretary’s decision not to implement the recommendation; and (II) a summary of alternative actions the Secretary will carry out to address the purposes underlying the recommendation. (3) Implementation plan For each recommendation that the Secretary implements under this subsection, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees an implementation plan that includes— (A) a summary of actions the Secretary has carried out, or intends to carry out, to implement the recommendation; and (B) a schedule, with specific milestones, for completing the implementation of the recommendation. (d) Covered units defined In this section, the term covered units (1) Army Special Forces. (2) Army Rangers. (3) Navy SEALs. (4) Air Force Combat Control Teams. (5) Air Force Pararescue. (6) Air Force Special Reconnaissance. (7) Marine Raider Regiments. (8) Marine Corps Force Reconnaissance. (9) Coast Guard Maritime Security Response Team. (10) Any other forces designated by the Secretary of Defense as special operations forces. (11) Pilot and navigator military occupational specialties. I Decorations and Awards 581. Establishment of the Atomic Veterans Service Medal (a) Service medal required The Secretary of Defense shall design and produce a military service medal, to be known as the Atomic Veterans Service Medal (b) Distribution of medal (1) Issuance to retired and former members At the request of a radiation-exposed veteran, the Secretary of Defense shall issue the Atomic Veterans Service Medal to the veteran. (2) Issuance to next-of-kin In the case of a radiation-exposed veteran who is deceased, the Secretary may provide for issuance of the Atomic Veterans Service Medal to the next-of-kin of the person. (3) Application The Secretary shall prepare and disseminate as appropriate an application by which radiation-exposed veterans and their next-of-kin may apply to receive the Atomic Veterans Service Medal. 582. Authorization for award of the distinguished-service cross for Ramiro F. Olivo for acts of valor during the Vietnam War (a) Authorization Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in section 7274 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the United States Armed Forces, the President of the United States is authorized to award the Distinguished-Service Cross under section 7272 of such title to Ramiro F. Olivo for the acts of valor during the Vietnam War described in subsection (b). (b) Acts of valor described The acts of valor described in this subsection are the actions of Ramiro F. Olivo on May 9, 1968, as a member of the Army while serving in the Republic of Vietnam with Company C, 1st Battalion, 5th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division. J Miscellaneous Reports and Other Matters 591. Expansion of Department of Defense STARBASE Program (a) In general Section 2193b of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the section heading, by striking science, mathematics, and technology science, technology, engineering, art and design, and mathematics (2) in subsection (a), by striking science, mathematics, and technology science, technology, engineering, art and design, and mathematics (3) in subsection (b), by striking mathematics, science, and technology science, technology, engineering, art and design, and mathematics (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 111 2193b. Improvement of education in technical fields: program for support of elementary and secondary education in science, technology, engineering, art and design, and mathematics. . 592. Inclusion of certain outlying areas in the Department of Defense STARBASE Program Section 2193b(h) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, and Guam 593. Prohibition on charging for or counting certain acronyms on headstones of individuals interred at Arlington National Cemetery The Secretary of the Army shall prescribe regulations or establish policies that, with regards to the headstone for an individual interred at Arlington National Cemetery, prohibit the charging of a fee for, or counting towards character or line count, the following acronyms: (1) KIA (2) MIA (3) POW 594. Report on placement of members of the Armed Forces in academic status who are victims of sexual assault onto Non-Rated Periods Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the feasibility and advisability, and current practice (if any), of the Department of Defense of granting requests by members of the Armed Forces who are in academic status (whether at the military service academies or in developmental education programs) and who are victims of sexual assault to be placed on a Non-Rated Period for their performance report. 595. Sense of Congress regarding advertising recruiting efforts It is the Sense of Congress that the Chiefs of the Armed Forces, in coordination with the Recruiting Commands of the Armed Forces, should give all due consideration to the use of local broadcasting and traditional news publishers when advertising. VI COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS A Pay and Allowances 601. Increase in basic pay Effective on January 1, 2021, the rates of monthly basic pay for members of the uniformed services are increased by 3.0 percent. 602. Basic needs allowance for low-income regular members (a) In general Chapter 7 section 402a 402b. Basic needs allowance for low-income regular members (a) Allowance required (1) Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense shall pay to each covered member a basic needs allowance in the amount determined for such member under subsection (b). (2) In the event a household contains two or more covered members entitled to receive the allowance under this section in a given year, only one allowance may be paid for that year to a covered member among such covered members whom such covered members shall jointly elect. (b) Amount of allowance for a covered member (1) The amount of the monthly allowance payable to a covered member under subsection (a) for a year shall be the aggregate amount equal to— (A) the aggregate amount equal to— (i) 130 percent of the Federal poverty guidelines of the Department of Health and Human Services for the location and number of persons in the household of the covered member for such year; minus (ii) the gross household income of the covered member during the preceding year; and (B) divided by 12. (2) The monthly allowance payable to a covered member for a year shall be payable for each of the 12 months following March of such year. (c) Notice of eligibility (1) (A) Not later than December 31 each year, the Director of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service shall notify, in writing, each individual whom the Director estimates will be a covered member during the following year of the potential entitlement of that individual to the allowance described in subsection (a) for that following year. (B) The preliminary notice under subparagraph (A) shall include information regarding financial management and assistance programs administered by the Secretary of Defense for which a covered member is eligible. (2) Not later than January 31 each year, each individual who seeks to receive the allowance for such year (whether or not subject to a notice for such year under paragraph (1)) shall submit to the Director such information as the Director shall require for purposes of this section in order to determine whether or not such individual is a covered member for such year. (3) Not later than February 28 each year, the Director shall notify, in writing, each individual the Director determines to be a covered member for such year. (d) Election not To receive allowance (1) A covered member otherwise entitled to receive the allowance under subsection (a) for a year may elect, in writing, not to receive the allowance for such year. Any election under this subsection shall be effective only for the year for which made. Any election for a year under this subsection is irrevocable. (2) A covered member who does not submit information described in subsection (d)(2) for a year as otherwise required by that subsection shall be deemed to have elected not to receive the allowance for such year. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term covered member (A) who has completed initial entry training; (B) whose gross household income during the most recent year did not exceed an amount equal to 130 percent of the Federal poverty guidelines of the Department of Health and Human Services for the location and number of persons in the household of the covered member for such year; and (C) who does not elect under subsection (d) not to receive the allowance for such year. (2) The term gross household income (f) Regulations The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations for the administration of this section. Subject to subsection (e)(2), such regulations shall specify the income to be included in, and excluded from, the gross household income of individuals for purposes of this section. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 402a the following new item: 402b. Basic needs allowance for low-income regular members. . 603. Reorganization of certain allowances other than travel and transportation allowances (a) Per diem for duty outside the continental United States (1) Transfer to chapter 7 Section 475 of title 37, United States Code, is transferred to chapter 7 of such title, inserted after section 403b, and redesignated as section 405. (2) Repeal of termination provision Section 405 of title 37, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), is amended by striking subsection (f). (b) Allowance for funeral honors duty (1) Transfer to chapter 7 Section 495 of title 37, United States Code, is transferred to chapter 7 of such title, inserted after section 433a, and redesignated as section 435. (2) Repeal of termination provision Section 435 of title 37, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), is amended by striking subsection (c). (c) Clerical amendments (1) Chapter 7 The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 (A) by inserting after the item relating to section 403b the following new item: 405. Travel and transportation allowances: per diem while on duty outside the continental United States. ; and (B) by inserting after the item relating to section 433a the following new item: 435. Funeral honors duty: allowance. . (2) Chapter 8 The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 8 B Bonuses and Special Incentive Pays 611. One-year extension of certain expiring bonus and special pay authorities (a) Authorities relating to reserve forces Section 910(g) of title 37, United States Code, relating to income replacement payments for reserve component members experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service, is amended by striking December 31, 2020 December 31, 2021 (b) Title 10 authorities relating to health care professionals The following sections of title 10, United States Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2020 December 31, 2021 (1) Section 2130a(a)(1), relating to nurse officer candidate accession program. (2) Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education loans for certain health professionals who serve in the Selected Reserve. (c) Authorities relating to nuclear officers Section 333(i) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking December 31, 2020 December 31, 2021 (d) Authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2020 December 31, 2021 (1) Section 331(h), relating to general bonus authority for enlisted members. (2) Section 332(g), relating to general bonus authority for officers. (3) Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive pay and bonus authorities for officers. (4) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for officers in health professions. (5) Section 336(g), relating to contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps. (6) Section 351(h), relating to hazardous duty pay. (7) Section 352(g), relating to assignment pay or special duty pay. (8) Section 353(i), relating to skill incentive pay or proficiency bonus. (9) Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to high priority units. (e) Authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing Section 403(b)(7)(E) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking December 31, 2020 December 31, 2021 612. Increase in certain hazardous duty incentive pay for members of the uniformed services Section 351(b) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking $250 $275 613. Standardization of payment of hazardous duty incentive pay for members of the uniformed services (a) In general Section 351(c) of title 37, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (c) Payment Hazardous duty pay shall be paid on a monthly basis. . (b) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect on October 1, 2020, and shall apply with respect to duty performed in any month beginning on or after that date. 614. Clarification of 30 days of continuous duty on board a ship required for family separation allowance for members of the uniformed services Section 427(a)(1)(B) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by inserting (or under orders to remain on board the ship while at the home port) of the ship 615. Expansion of reimbursable State licensure and certification costs for a military spouse arising from relocation Section 476(p)(5) of title 37, United States Code, is amended in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking and fees, continuing education courses, and C Family and Survivor Benefits 621. Expansion of authority to provide financial assistance to civilian providers of child care services or youth program services for survivors of members of the Armed Forces who die in the line of duty Section 1798(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking in combat-related incidents 622. Expansion of death gratuity for ROTC graduates Section 623(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 the date of the enactment of this Act May 1, 2017 623. Recalculation of financial assistance for providers of child care services and youth program services for dependents (a) In general Not later than July 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a method by which to determine appropriate amounts of financial assistance under section 1798 of title 10, United States Code. In such development, the Secretary shall take into consideration the following: (1) Grades of members of the Armed Forces. (2) The cost of living in an applicable locale. (3) Whether a military installation has a military child development center, including any wait list length. (4) Whether a military child development center has vacant child care employee positions. (5) The capacity of licensed civilian child care providers in an applicable locale. (6) The average cost of licensed civilian child care services available in an applicable locale. (b) Report Not later than August 1, 2021, the Secretary shall submit a report the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the method developed under this section. (c) Definitions In this section, the terms child care employee military child development center 624. Priority for certain military family housing to a member of the Armed Forces whose spouse agrees to provide family home day care services (a) Priority If the Secretary of a military department determines that not enough child care employees are employed at a military child development center on a military installation under the jurisdiction of that Secretary to adequately care for the children of members of the Armed Forces stationed at that military installation, the Secretary, to the extent practicable, may give priority for covered military family housing to a member whose spouse is an eligible military spouse. (b) Number of priority positions A Secretary of a military department may grant priority under subsection (a) only to the minimum number of eligible military spouses that the Secretary determines necessary to provide adequate child care to the children of members stationed at a military installation described in subsection (a). (c) Limitation Nothing in this section may be construed to require the Secretary of a military department to provide covered military family housing that has been adapted for disabled individuals to a member under this section instead of to a member with one more dependents enrolled in the Exceptional Family Member Program. (d) Result of failure to provide family home day care services or loss of eligibility The Secretary of the military department concerned may remove a household provided covered military family housing under this section therefrom if the Secretary determines the spouse of that member has failed to abide by an agreement described in subsection (e)(3) or has ceased to be an eligible military spouse. Such removal may not occur sooner than 60 days after the date of such determination. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The terms child care employee family home day care military child development center (2) The term covered military family housing (A) located on a military installation described in subsection (a); and (B) that the Secretary of the military department concerned determines is large enough to provide family home day care services to no fewer than six children (not including children in the household of the eligible military spouse). (3) The term eligible military spouse (A) is eligible for military family housing; (B) is eligible to provide family home day care services; (C) has provided family home day care services for at least one year; and (D) agrees in writing to provide family home day care services in covered military family housing for a period determined by the Secretary of the military department concerned. 625. Study on feasibility of TSP contributions by military spouses (a) Study required The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study on potential enhancements to the military Thrift Savings Plan administered by the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board. (b) Elements The study under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An evaluation of the effect of allowing military spouses to contribute or make eligible retirement account transfers to the military Thrift Savings Plan account of the member of the Armed Forces to whom that military spouse in married. (2) Legislation the Secretary determines necessary to permit contributions and transfers described in paragraph (1). (3) An evaluation of whether and to what extent employer-funded matching of contributions described in paragraph (1) may encourage further participation in the military Thrift Savings Plan. (c) Reporting (1) Initial report Not later than February 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board a report on the results of the study under subsection (a). (2) Analysis Not later than 60 days after receiving the report under paragraph (1), the Federal Thrift Savings Retirement Board shall analyze the report under paragraph (1), generate recommendations and comments it determines appropriate, and submit such analysis, recommendations, and comments to the Secretary. (3) Final report Not later than April 1, 2021, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives the report under paragraph (1) and the analysis, recommendations, and comments under paragraph (2). D Defense Resale Matters 631 . Base responders essential needs and dining access (a) In general Chapter 54 1066. Use of commissary stores and MWR facilities: protective services civilian employees (a) Eligibility of protective services civilian employees An individual employed as a protective services civilian employee at a military installation shall be permitted to purchase food and hygiene items at a commissary store or MWR retail facility located on that military installation. (b) User fee authority (1) The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations that impose a user fee on individuals who are eligible solely under this section to purchase merchandise at a commissary store or MWR retail facility. (2) The Secretary shall set the user fee under this subsection at a rate that the Secretary determines will offset any increase in expenses arising from this section borne by the Department of the Treasury on behalf of commissary stores associated with the use of credit or debit cards for customer purchases, including expenses related to card network use and related transaction processing fees. (3) The Secretary shall deposit funds collected pursuant to a user fee under this subsection in the General Fund of the Treasury. (4) Any fee under this subsection is in addition to the uniform surcharge under section 2484(d) of this title. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) The term MWR retail facility (2) The term protective services civilian employee (A) Security Administration (GS–0080). (B) Fire Protection and Prevention (GS–0081). (C) Police (GS–0083). (D) Security Guard (GS–0085). (E) Emergency Management (GS–0089). . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 54 1066. Use of commissary stores and MWR facilities: protective services civilian employees. . 632. First responder access to mobile exchanges Section 1146 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (d) Emergency response providers during a declared major disaster or emergency The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations to allow an emergency response provider (as that term is defined in section 2 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 ( Public Law 107–296 6 U.S.C. 101 42 U.S.C. 5170 . 633. Updated business case analysis for consolidation of the defense resale system (a) In general Not later than March 1, 2021, the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, in coordination with the Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall update the study titled Study to Determine the Feasibility of Consolidation of the Defense Resale Entities (1) establishes new baselines for— (A) savings from the costs of goods sold; (B) costs of new information technology required for such consolidation; and (C) costs of headquarters relocation arising from such consolidation; and (2) addresses each recommendation for executive action in the Government Accountability Office report GAO–20–418SU. (b) Review and comment Not later than April 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall make the updated business case analysis (in this section referred to as the updated BCA (c) Submittal to congressional committees Not later than June 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall make any comments made under subsection (b) and the updated BCA available to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives. (d) Delay of consolidation The Secretary of Defense may not take any action to consolidate military exchanges and commissaries until the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives notify the Secretary in writing of receipt and acceptance of the updated BCA. E Other Personnel Benefits 641. Maintenance of funding for Stars and Stripes (a) Funding (1) Operation and maintenance Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 in Division D of this Act and available for operations and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301 of this Act, $9,000,000 shall be made available for the purpose of maintaining the operations and publication of Stars and Stripes. (2) Contingency operations Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 in Division D of this Act and available for overseas contingency operations for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding tables in section 4301 of this Act, $6,000,000 shall be made available for the purpose of maintaining the operations and publication of Stars and Stripes (b) Report on business case analysis Not later than March 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the editor of Stars and Stripes, shall submit a report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives detailing the business case analysis for various options for Stars and Stripes. The report shall contain the following elements: (1) An analysis of the pros and cons of, and business case for, continuing the operation and publication of Stars and Stripes at its current levels, including other options for the independent reporting currently provided, especially in a deployed environment. (2) An analysis of the modes of communication used by Stars and Stripes. (3) An analysis of potential reduced operations of Stars and Stripes. (4) An analysis of the operation of Stars and Stripes solely as a non-appropriated entity. (5) An analysis of operating Stars and Stripes as a category B morale, welfare, and recreation entity. (6) An assessment of the value of the availability of Stars and Stripes (in print or an electronic version) to deployed or overseas members of the Armed Forces. VII Health Care Provisions A TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits 701. Expansion of mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces Section 1074m of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (g) Mental health assessments for participation in certain activities (1) The Secretary shall provide to a member described in paragraph (2) mental health assessments under this section in a frequency and schedule that the Secretary determines to be as similar as practicable to the frequency and schedule for such assessments under subsection (a)(1). (2) A member described in this paragraph is a member who, while not deployed in support of a contingency operation, participated in warfighting activities that had a direct and immediate impact on a combat operation or other military operation. . 702. Mandatory referral for mental health evaluation Section 1090a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection: (e) Process applicable to member disclosure The regulations required by subsection (a) shall— (1) establish a phrase that enables a member of the armed forces to trigger a referral of the member by a commanding officer or supervisor for a mental health evaluation; (2) require a commanding officer or supervisor to make such referral as soon as practicable following disclosure by the member to the commanding officer or supervisor of the phrase established under paragraph (1); and (3) ensure that the process protects the confidentiality of the member in a manner similar to the confidentiality provided for members making restricted reports under section 1565b(b) of this title. . 703. Assessments and testing relating to exposure to perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (a) Periodic health assessment The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that any periodic health assessment provided to a member of the Armed Forces includes an evaluation of whether the member has been— (1) based or stationed at a military installation identified by the Department of Defense as a location with a known or suspected release of perfluoroalkyl substances or polyfluoroalkyl substances during the period in which the member was based or stationed at the military installation; or (2) exposed to such substances, including by evaluating any information in the health record of the member. (b) Separation history and physical examinations Section 1145(a)(5) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (D) The Secretary concerned shall ensure that each physical examination of a member under subparagraph (A) includes an assessment of whether the member was— (i) based or stationed at a military installation identified by the Department as a location with a known or suspected release of perfluoroalkyl substances or polyfluoroalkyl substances during the period in which the member was based or stationed at the military installation; or (ii) exposed to such substances, including by assessing any information in the health record of the member. . (c) Deployment assessments Section 1074f(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (E) An assessment of whether the member was— (i) based or stationed at a military installation identified by the Department as a location with a known or suspected release of perfluoroalkyl substances or polyfluoroalkyl substances during the period in which the member was based or stationed at the military installation; or (ii) exposed to such substances, including by assessing any information in the health record of the member. . (d) Provision of blood testing (1) Members of the armed forces (A) In general If a covered evaluation of a member of the Armed Forces results in a positive determination of potential exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances or polyfluoroalkyl substances, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to that member, during that covered evaluation, blood testing to determine and document potential exposure to such substances. (B) Inclusion in health record The results of blood testing of a member of the Armed Forces conducted under subparagraph (A) shall be included in the health record of the member. (2) Covered evaluation defined In this subsection, the term covered evaluation (A) a periodic health assessment conducted in accordance with subsection (a); (B) a separation history and physical examination conducted under section 1145(a)(5) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (b); and (C) a deployment assessment conducted under section 1074f(b)(2) of such title, as amended by subsection (c). 704. Improvement to breast cancer screening Section 1074d(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: , including through the use of digital breast tomosynthesis B Health Care Administration 711. Protection of the Armed Forces from infectious diseases (a) In general Chapter 55 section 1073d 1073e. Protection of armed forces from infectious diseases (a) Protection The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the armed forces have the diagnostic equipment, testing capabilities, and personal protective equipment necessary to protect members of the armed forces from the threat of infectious diseases and to treat members who contract infectious diseases. (b) Requirements In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall ensure the following: (1) Each military medical treatment facility has the testing capabilities described in such subsection. (2) Each deployed naval vessel has the testing capabilities described in such subsection. (3) Members of the armed forces deployed in support of a contingency operation outside of the United States have access to the testing capabilities described in such subsection, including at field hospitals, combat support hospitals, field medical stations, and expeditionary medical facilities. (4) The Department of Defense maintains a stock of personal protective equipment in a quantity sufficient for each member of the armed forces, including the reserve components thereof. (c) Research and development (1) The Secretary shall include with the defense budget materials (as defined by section 231(f) of this title) for a fiscal year a plan to research and develop vaccines for infectious diseases. (2) The Secretary shall ensure that the medical laboratories of the Department of Defense are equipped with the technology needed to facilitate rapid research in the case of a pandemic. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of contents at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1073d the following new item: 1073e. Protection of armed forces from infectious diseases. . 712. Inclusion of drugs, biological products, and critical medical supplies in national security strategy for national technology and industrial base (a) National security strategy for national technology and industrial base Section 2501(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (11) Providing for the provision of drugs, biological products, vaccines, and critical medical supplies (including personal protective equipment, diagnostic and testing capabilities, and lifesaving breathing apparatuses required for the treatment of severe respiratory illness and respiratory distress) required to enable combat readiness and protect the health of the armed forces. . (b) Report (1) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, and the heads of other departments and agencies of the Federal Government that the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on vulnerabilities to the drugs, biological products, vaccines, and critical medical supplies of the Department of Defense. (2) Matters included The report under paragraph (1) shall include— (A) an identification and origin of any finished drugs, as identified by the Secretary of Defense, and the essential components of such drugs, including raw materials, chemical components, and active pharmaceutical ingredients that are necessary for the manufacture of such drugs, whose supply is at risk of disruption during a time of war or national emergency; (B) an identification of shortages of finished drugs, biological products, vaccines, and critical medical supplies essential for combat readiness and the protection of the health of the Armed Forces, as identified by the Secretary of Defense; (C) an identification of the defense and geopolitical contingencies that are sufficiently likely to arise that may lead to the discontinuance, interruption or meaningful disruption in the supply of a drug, biological product, vaccine, or critical medical supply, and recommendations regarding actions the Secretary of Defense should take to reasonably prepare for the occurrence of such contingencies; (D) an assessment conducted by the Secretary of Defense of the resilience and capacity of the current supply chain and industrial base to support national defense upon the occurrence of the contingencies identified in subparagraph (C), including with respect to— (i) the manufacturing capacity of the United States; (ii) gaps in domestic manufacturing capabilities, including non-existent, extinct, threatened, and single-point-of-failure capabilities; and (iii) supply chains with single points of failure and limited resiliency; and (E) recommendations to enhance and strengthen the surge requirements and readiness contracts of the Department of Defense to ensure the sufficiency of the stockpile of the Department of, and the ready access by the Department to, critical medical supplies, pharmaceuticals, vaccines, counter-measure prophylaxis, and personal protective equipment, including with respect to the effectiveness of the theater lead agent for medical materiel program in support of the combatant commands. (3) Form The report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in classified form. (4) Definitions In this subsection: (A) The term appropriate congressional committees (i) The congressional defense committees. (ii) The Committee on Energy and Commerce and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives. (iii) The Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate. (B) The term critical medical equipment 713. Contract authority of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences Section 2113(g)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subparagraph (E), by striking and (2) in subparagraph (F), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (G) notwithstanding section 2304(k) of this title, to enter into such contracts, cooperative agreements, or grants on a sole-source basis pursuant to section 2304(c)(5) of this title. . 714. Extension of organization requirements for Defense Health Agency Section 1073c(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking September 30, 2022 September 30, 2025 715. Modification to limitation on the realignment or reduction of military medical manning end strength Section 719 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking may not realign or reduce military medical end strength authorizations until may not realign or reduce military medical end strength authorizations during the one-year period following the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, and after such period, may not realign or reduce such authorizations unless (2) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting before the period at the end the following: , including with respect to both the homeland defense mission and pandemic influenza 716. Modifications to implementation plan for restructure or realignment of military medical treatment facilities Section 703(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (D) and inserting the following new subparagraph: (D) A description of how the Secretary will carry out subsection (b), including with respect to— (i) the standards required for health care providers to accept and transition covered beneficiaries to the purchased care component of the TRICARE program; (ii) a method to monitor and report on quality benchmarks for the beneficiary population that is required to transition to such component of the TRICARE program; and (iii) a process by which the Defense Health Agency will ensure that such component of the TRICARE program has the required capacity. ; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) Notice and wait The Secretary may not implement the plan under paragraph (1) unless— (A) the Secretary has submitted the plan to the congressional defense committees; and (B) a one-year period elapses following the later of the date of such submission or the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021. . 717. Policy to address opioid prescription abuse prevention (a) Requirement The Secretary of Defense shall develop a policy and tracking mechanism for opioids that monitors and prohibits the over prescribing of opioids to ensure compliance with clinical practice guidelines. (b) Elements The requirements under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) Limit the prescribing of opioids to the morphine milligram equivalent level per day specified in the guideline published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention titled CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain—United States, 2016 (2) Limit the supply of opioids to within clinically accepted guidelines. (3) Develop a waiver process for specific patient categories that will require treatment beyond the limit specified in paragraph (1). (4) Implement controls to ensure that the prescriptions in the military health system data repository exist and that the dispense date and the metric quantity field for opioid prescriptions in liquid form are consistent among all systems. (5) Implement opioid prescribing controls within the electronic health record system known as Genesis (6) Develop metrics that can be used by the Defense Health Agency and each military medical treatment facility to actively monitor and limit the over prescribing of opioids. (7) Develop a report that tracks progression toward reduced levels of opioid use. 718. Addition of burn pit registration to electronic health records of members of the Armed Forces and veterans (a) Updates to electronic health records Beginning not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act— (1) the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the electronic health record maintained by such Secretary of a member of the Armed Forces registered with the burn pit registry is updated with any information contained in such registry; and (2) the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall ensure that the electronic health record maintained by such Secretary of a veteran registered with the burn pit registry is updated with any information contained in such registry. (b) Burn pit registry defined In this section, the term “burn pit registry” means the registry established under section 201 of the Dignified Burial and Other Veterans’ Benefits Improvement Act of 2012 ( Public Law 112–260 38 U.S.C. 527 C Matters relating to COVID–19 721. COVID–19 military health system review panel (a) Establishment The Secretary of Defense shall establish a panel to be known as the COVID–19 Military Health System Review Panel panel (b) Composition (1) Members The panel shall be composed of the following members: (A) The President of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. (B) The Director of the Defense Health Agency. (C) The Surgeon General of the Army. (D) The Surgeon General of the Navy. (E) The Surgeon General of the Air Force. (F) The Joint Staff Surgeon. (G) The Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Readiness Policy and Oversight. (H) The Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Resources Management and Policy. (2) Chairperson The chairperson of the panel shall be the President of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. (3) Terms Each member shall be appointed for the life of the panel. (c) Duties (1) In general The panel shall— (A) review the response of the military health system to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID–19) and the effects of COVID–19 on such system, including by analyzing any strengths or weaknesses of such system identified as a result COVID–19; and (B) using information from the review, make such recommendations as the panel considers appropriate with respect to any policy, practice, organization, manning level, funding level, or legislative authority relating to the military health system. (2) Elements of review In conducting the review under paragraph (1), each member of the panel shall lead a review of at least one of the following elements, with respect to the military health system: (A) Policy, including any policy relating to force health protection or medical standards for the appointment, enlistment, or induction of individuals into the Armed Forces. (B) Public health activities, including any activity relating to risk communication, surveillance, or contact tracing. (C) Research, diagnostics, and therapeutics. (D) Logistics and technology. (E) Force structure and manning. (F) Governance and organization. (G) Operational capabilities and operational support. (H) Education and training. (I) Health benefits under the TRICARE program. (J) Engagement and security activities relating to global health. (K) The financial impact of COVID–19 on the military health system. (d) Report Not later than June 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the findings of the panel as a result of the review under subsection (c)(1)(A), together with such recommendations as the panel considers appropriate under subsection (c)(1)(B). (e) Termination The panel shall terminate on June 1, 2021. 722. COVID–19 global war on pandemics (a) Strategy The Secretary of Defense shall develop a strategy for pandemic preparedness and response that includes the following: (1) Identification of activities necessary to be carried out prior to a pandemic to ensure preparedness and effective communication of roles and responsibilities within the Department of Defense, including— (A) reviewing the frequency of each exercise conducted by the Department or a military department that relates to a pandemic or severe influenza season or related force health protection; (B) ensuring such exercises are appropriately planned, resourced, and practiced; (C) including a consideration of the capabilities and capacities necessary to carry out the strategy under this section, and related operations for force health protection, and ensuring that these are included in each cost evaluation, Defense-wide review, or manning assessment of the Department of Defense that affects such capabilities and capacities; (D) reviewing the placement, exploring broader utilization of global health engagement liaisons, and increasing the scope of global health activities of the Department of Defense; (E) assessing a potential career track relating to health protection research for members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense; (F) providing to members of the Armed Forces guidance on force health protection prior to and during a pandemic or severe influenza season, including guidance on specific behaviors or actions required, such as self-isolating, social distancing, and additional protective measures to be carried out after contracting a novel virus or influenza; (G) reviewing and updating the inventory of medical supplies and equipment of the Department of Defense that is available for operational support to the combatant commands prior to and during a pandemic (such as vaccines, biologics, drugs, preventive medicine, antiviral medicine, and equipment relating to trauma support), including a review of— (i) the sufficiency of prepositioned stocks; and (ii) the effectiveness of the Warstopper Program of the Defense Logistics Agency, or such successor program; (H) reviewing and updating distribution plans of the Department of Defense for critical medical supplies and equipment within the inventory of the Department of Defense, including vaccines and antiviral medicines; and (I) reviewing and updating research on infectious diseases and preventive medicine conducted by the military health system, including research conducted by the Health Related Communities of Interest of the Department of Defense, the Joint Program Committees, the overseas medical laboratories of the Department of Defense, the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch, or other elements of the Department of Defense that conduct research in support of members of the Armed Forces or beneficiaries under the TRICARE program. (2) Review of Department of Defense systems for health surveillance and detection to ensure continuous situational awareness and early warning with respect to a pandemic, including a review of— (A) the levels of funding and investment, and the overall value, of the Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System of the Department of Defense, including the value demonstrated by the role of such system in— (i) improving the Department of Defense prevention and surveillance of, and the response to, infectious diseases that may impact members of the Armed Forces; (ii) informing decisions relating to force health protection across the geographic combatant commands; (iii) ensuring laboratory readiness to support pandemic response efforts and to understand infectious disease threats to the Armed Forces; and (iv) coordinating and collaborating with partners, such as the geographic combatant commands, other Federal agencies, and international partners; (B) the levels of funding and investment, and the overall value, of the overseas medical laboratories of the Department of Defense, including the value demonstrated by the role of such laboratories in conducting research and forming partnerships with other elements of the Department of Defense, other Federal agencies, international partners in the country in which such laboratory is located, and, as applicable, the private sector of the United States; and (C) the levels of funding and investment, and the overall value, of the Direct HIV/AIDS Prevention Program of the Department of Defense, including the value demonstrated by the role of such program in developing (in coordination with other Federal agencies) programs for the prevention, care, and treatment of the human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immune deficiency syndrome. (3) Identification of activities to limit the spread of an infectious disease outbreak among members of the Armed Forces and beneficiaries under the TRICARE program, including activities to mitigate the health, social, and economic impacts of a pandemic on such members and beneficiaries, including by— (A) reviewing the role of the Department of Defense in the National Disaster Medical System under section 2812 of the Public Health Service Act ( 42 U.S.C. 300hh–11 (B) determining the range of public health capacity, medical surge capacity, administrative capacity, and veterinary capacity necessary for the Armed Forces to— (i) support operations during a pandemic; and (ii) develop mechanisms to reshape force structure during such pandemic as necessary (contingent upon primary mission requirements); and (C) determining the range of activities for operational medical support and infrastructure sustainment that the Department of Defense and other Federal agencies have the capacity to implement during a pandemic (contingent upon primary mission requirements), and develop plans for the implementation of such activities. (b) Study on response to COVID–19 The Secretary shall conduct a study on the response of the military health system to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID–19). (c) Report Not later than June 1, 2021, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing— (1) the strategy under subsection (a); and (2) the study under subsection (b), including any findings or recommendations from the study that relate to an element of the strategy under subsection (a), such as recommended changes to policy, funding, practices, manning, organization, or legislative authority. 723. Registry of TRICARE beneficiaries diagnosed with COVID–19 (a) Establishment Not later than June 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain a registry of TRICARE beneficiaries who have been diagnosed with COVID–19. (b) Contents The registry under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to each TRICARE beneficiary included in the registry, the following: (1) The demographic information of the beneficiary. (2) Information on the industrial or occupational history of the beneficiary, to the extent such information is available in the records regarding the COVID–19 diagnosis of the beneficiary. (3) Administrative information regarding the COVID–19 diagnosis of the beneficiary, including the date of the diagnosis and the location and source of the test used to make the diagnosis. (4) Any symptoms of COVID–19 manifested in the beneficiary. (5) Any treatments for COVID–19 taken by the beneficiary, or other medications taken by the beneficiary, when the beneficiary was diagnosed with COVID–19. (6) Any pathological data characterizing the incidence of COVID–19 and the type of treatment for COVID–19 provided to the beneficiary. (7) Any other information determined appropriate by the Secretary. (c) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on establishing the registry under subsection (a), including— (1) a plan to implement the registry; (2) the cost of implementing the registry; (3) the location of the registry; and (4) any recommended legislative changes with respect to establishing the registry. (d) TRICARE beneficiary defined In this section, the term TRICARE beneficiary (1) An individual covered by section 1074(a) of title 10, United States Code. (2) A covered beneficiary (as defined in section 1072 of title 10, United States Code). D Reports and Other Matters 731. Modifications to pilot program on civilian and military partnerships to enhance interoperability and medical surge capability and capacity of national disaster medical system Section 740 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (1) in subsection (a)— (A) by striking The Secretary of Defense may Beginning not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall (B) by striking and the Secretary of Transportation the Secretary of Transportation, and the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (2) in subsection (d), by striking and the Secretary of Transportation the Secretary of Transportation, and the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (3) in subsection (f)— (A) by striking the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives the appropriate congressional committees (B) in paragraph (1)(B)(i), by inserting before the period the following: , including a recommendation for at least one of the locations selected under subsection (c) (C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this subsection, the term appropriate congressional committees (A) The Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, the Committee on Homeland Security, and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives. (B) The Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate. . 732. Reports on suicide among members of the Armed Forces and suicide prevention programs and activities of the Department of Defense Section 741(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (1) in subparagraph (B), by adding at the end the following new clause: (iii) The one-year period following the date on which the member returns from such a deployment. ; (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) through (H) as subparagraphs (E) through (I), respectively; (3) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following new subparagraph (D): (D) The number of suicides involving a member who was prescribed a medication to treat a mental health or behavioral health diagnosis during the one-year period preceding the death. ; and (4) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (J) A description of the programs carried out by the military departments to address and reduce the stigma associated with seeking assistance for mental health or suicidal thoughts. . 733. Clarification of research under Joint Trauma Education and Training Directorate and inclusion of military working dogs (a) In general Subsection (b) of section 708 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 10 U.S.C. 1071 (1) in paragraph (7), by striking of members of the Armed Forces with respect to both members of the Armed Forces and military working dogs (2) by striking paragraph (9) and inserting the following new paragraph: (9) To inform and advise the conduct of research on the leading causes of morbidity and mortality of members of the Armed Forces and military working dogs in combat. . (b) Veterinarians in personnel management plan Subsection (d)(1) of such section is amended— (1) by redesignating subparagraph (F) as subparagraph (G); and (2) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the following new subparagraph: (F) Veterinary care. . 734. Extension of the Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Project Section 1704(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( Public Law 111–84 Public Law 116–92 September 30, 2021 September 30, 2023 735. Information sharing by Secretary of Defense regarding prevention of infant and maternal mortality (a) Authorization of information sharing The Secretary of Defense may enter into memoranda of understanding with State and local health authorities to share the practices of, and lessons learned by, the military health system for the prevention of infant and maternal mortality. (b) State defined In this section, the term State 736. Grant program for increased cooperation on post-traumatic stress disorder research between United States and Israel (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury Research Program, should seek to explore scientific collaboration between American academic institutions and nonprofit research entities, and Israeli institutions with expertise in researching, diagnosing, and treating post-traumatic stress disorder. (b) Grant program The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Secretary of State, shall award grants to eligible entities to carry out collaborative research between the United States and Israel with respect to post-traumatic stress disorders. The Secretary of Defense shall carry out the grant program under this section in accordance with the agreement titled Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Israel on the United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (c) Eligible entities To be eligible to receive a grant under this section, an entity shall be an academic institution or a nonprofit entity located in the United States. (d) Award The Secretary shall award grants under this section to eligible entities that— (1) carry out a research project that— (A) addresses a requirement in the area of post-traumatic stress disorders that the Secretary determines appropriate to research using such grant; and (B) is conducted by the eligible entity and an entity in Israel under a joint research agreement; and (2) meet such other criteria that the Secretary may establish. (e) Application To be eligible to receive a grant under this section, an eligible entity shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and containing such commitments and information as the Secretary may require. (f) Gift authority The Secretary may accept, hold, and administer, any gift of money made on the condition that the gift be used for the purpose of the grant program under this section. Such gifts of money accepted under this subsection shall be deposited in the Treasury in the Department of Defense General Gift Fund and shall be available, subject to appropriation, without fiscal year limitation. (g) Reports Not later than 180 days after the date on which an eligible entity completes a research project using a grant under this section, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that contains— (1) a description of how the eligible entity used the grant; and (2) an evaluation of the level of success of the research project. (h) Termination The authority to award grants under this section shall terminate on the date that is seven years after the date on which the first such grant is awarded. 737. Pilot program on cryopreservation and storage (a) Pilot program The Secretary of Defense shall establish a pilot program to provide not more than 1,000 members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty with the opportunity to cryopreserve and store their gametes prior to deployment to a combat zone. (b) Period (1) In general The Secretary shall provide for the cryopreservation and storage of gametes of a participating member of the Armed Forces under subsection (a), at no cost to the member, in a facility of the Department of Defense or at a private entity pursuant to a contract under subsection (d) until the date that is one year after the retirement, separation, or release of the member from the Armed Forces. (2) Continued cryopreservation and storage At the end of the one-year period specified in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall authorize an individual whose gametes were cryopreserved and stored in a facility of the Department as described in that paragraph to select, including pursuant to an advance medical directive or military testamentary instrument completed under subsection (c), one of the following options: (A) To continue such cryopreservation and storage in such facility with the cost of such cryopreservation and storage borne by the individual. (B) To transfer the gametes to a private cryopreservation and storage facility selected by the individual. (C) To authorize the Secretary to dispose of the gametes of the individual not earlier than the date that is 90 days after the end of the one-year period specified in paragraph (1) with respect to the individual. (c) Advance medical directive and military testamentary instrument A member of the Armed Forces who elects to cryopreserve and store their gametes under this section shall complete an advance medical directive described in section 1044c(b) of title 10, United States Code, and a military testamentary instrument described in section 1044d(b) of such title, that explicitly specifies the use of their cryopreserved and stored gametes if such member dies or otherwise loses the capacity to consent to the use of their cryopreserved and stored gametes. (d) Agreements To carry out this section, the Secretary may enter into agreements with private entities that provide cryopreservation and storage services for gametes. 738. Pilot program on parents serving as certified nursing assistants for children under TRICARE program (a) Pilot program The Director of the Defense Health Agency may carry out a pilot program under which an eligible parent serves as a certified nursing assistant under the TRICARE program with respect to providing personal care services to a covered child. (b) Duration If the Director carries out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Director shall carry out the pilot program for a period of 18 months. (c) Briefing If the Director carries out the pilot program under subsection (a), not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the pilot program. (d) Report If the Director carries out the pilot program under subsection (a), not later than 180 days after the date of the completion of the pilot program, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program. The report shall include— (1) the cost of the program; (2) an analysis of whether the pilot program met established performance metrics; (3) an analysis of whether the pilot program provided the standard of care to the patient that is required; and (4) the recommendation of the Director regarding whether the pilot program should be made permanent. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term covered child (A) is the child of a member of the uniformed services serving on active duty; and (B) is eligible for private duty nursing under the Extended Care Health Option under subsections (d) through (f) of section 1079 of such title. (2) The term eligible parent (A) a certified nursing assistant; and (B) the parent of a covered child. (3) The term personal care services (4) The term TRICARE program 739. Study on incidence of cancer diagnosis and mortality among pilots in the Armed Forces (a) Study Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into an agreement with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to conduct a study to— (1) determine the incidence of cancer diagnosis and mortality among members, and former members, of the Armed Forces who serve as pilots compared to such members who do not serve as pilots, including by determining such incidence based on gender, age, flying hours, Armed Force, and type of aircraft; and (2) determine the appropriate age to begin screening such members for cancer, including by determining such age based on gender, flying hours, Armed Force, and type of aircraft. (b) Submission Not later than two years after the date on which the Secretary enters into the agreement under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the findings from the study under such subsection. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) The term appropriate congressional committees (A) the Committees on Armed Services and Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives; and (B) the Committees on Armed Services and Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate. (2) The term Armed Forces (3) The term pilot 740. Report on diet and nutrition of members of the Armed Forces Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the diet and nutrition of members of the Armed Forces. The report shall describe the following: (1) The relationship between the diet and nutrition of members and the health, performance, and combat effectiveness of members. (2) The relationship between diets high in Omega–3 fatty acids, or other diets that may lower inflammation and obesity, and improved mental health. (3) The extent to which the food and beverages offered at the dining halls of the Armed Forces as of the date of the report are designed to optimize the health, performance, and combat effectiveness of members according to science-based approaches. (4) The plan of the Secretary to improve the health, performance, and combat effectiveness of members by modifying the food and beverages offered at the dining halls of the Armed Forces, including in ways that minimize the change members. (5) Expected costs and timeline to implement such plan, including any expected savings from reduced medical costs. 741. Report on costs and benefits of allowing retired members of the Armed Forces to contribute to health savings accounts (a) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the costs and benefits of allowing covered individuals to make contributions to a health savings account. (b) Matters The report under subsection (a) shall include a description of the following: (1) Any anticipated cost savings as a result of allowing covered individuals to make contributions to health savings accounts. (2) Any anticipated increase in health care options available to covered individuals as a result of allowing such contributions. (3) Any anticipated disruption or delay in health services or benefits for covered individuals as a result of allowing such contributions. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) The term covered individual (A) means a beneficiary covered by subsection (c) of section 1086 of title 10, United States Code; and (B) includes a Medicare-eligible beneficiary described in subsection (d)(2) of such section. (2) The term health savings account section 223(d) 742. Study on toxic exposure at Karshi–Khanabad Air Base, Uzbekistan (a) Study (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study on toxic exposure by members of the Armed Forces deployed to Karshi–Khanabad Air Base, Uzbekistan, at any time during the period beginning October 1, 2001, and ending December 31, 2005. (2) Matters included The study under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An assessment regarding the conditions of Karshi–Khanabad Air Base, Uzbekistan, during the period beginning October 1, 2001, and ending December 31, 2005, including an identification of toxic substances contaminating the Air Base during such period. (B) An epidemiological study of the health consequences of a member of the Armed Forces deployed to the Air Base during such period. (C) An assessment of any association between exposure to toxic substances identified under subparagraph (A) and the health consequences studied under subparagraph (B). (b) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on the results of the study under subsection (a). 743. Audit of medical conditions of tenants in privatized military housing (a) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall commence the conduct of an audit of the medical conditions of eligible individuals and the association between adverse exposures of such individuals in unsafe or unhealthy housing units and the health of such individuals. (b) Content of audit The audit conducted under subsection (a) shall— (1) determine the percentage of units of privatized military housing that are unsafe or unhealthy housing units; (2) study the adverse exposures of eligible individuals that relate to residing in an unsafe or unhealthy housing unit and the effect of such exposures on the health of such individuals; and (3) determine the association, to the extent permitted by available scientific data, and provide quantifiable data on such association, between such adverse exposures and the occurrence of a medical condition in eligible individuals residing in unsafe or unhealthy housing units. (c) Conduct of audit The Inspector General of the Department shall conduct the audit under subsection (a) using the same privacy preserving guidelines used by the Inspector General in conducting other audits of health records. (d) Source of data In conducting the audit under subsection (a), the Inspector General of the Department shall use— (1) de-identified data from electronic health records of the Department; (2) records of claims under the TRICARE program (as defined in section 1072(7) of title 10, United States Code); and (3) such other data as determined necessary by the Inspector General. (e) Submittal and public availability of report Not later than one year after the commencement of the audit under subsection (a), the Inspector General of the Department shall— (1) submit to the Secretary of Defense and the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the results of the audit conducted under subsection (a); and (2) publish such report on a publicly available internet website of the Department of Defense. (f) Definitions In this section: (1) The term eligible individual (A) has resided in an unsafe or unhealthy housing unit; and (B) has registered under the Housing Environmental Health Response Registry of the Army. (2) The term privatized military housing chapter 169 (3) The term unsafe or unhealthy housing unit (A) Physiological hazards, including the following: (i) Dampness or microbial growth. (ii) Lead-based paint. (iii) Asbestos or manmade fibers. (iv) Ionizing radiation. (v) Biocides. (vi) Carbon monoxide. (vii) Volatile organic compounds. (viii) Infectious agents. (ix) Fine particulate matter. (B) Psychological hazards, including ease of access by unlawful intruders or lighting issues. (C) Poor ventilation. (D) Safety hazards. (E) Other hazards as determined by the Inspector General of the Department. 744. Report on Integrated Disability Evaluation System (a) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the findings of a study, conducted by the Secretary for the purposes of the report, of the implementation and application of the Integrated Disability Evaluation System. (b) Matters included The report under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) All changes to policies and procedures applicable to the implementation of the Integrated Disability Evaluation System from the previous disability evaluation system. (2) The extent to which the Integrated Disability Evaluation System is the primary means of processing members of the Armed Forces through the disability evaluation system process. (3) The extent to which the military departments and the Defense Health Agency coordinate— (A) treatment of members of the Armed Forces; (B) referrals of members of the Armed Forces to a medical evaluation board; (C) appointing a convening authority and staffing a medical evaluation board; (D) the sharing of medical documentation with a medical evaluation board; (E) evaluations of members of the Armed Forces for initial or subsequent limited duty status; and (F) a medical evaluation board referral to a physical evaluation board. (4) The process for members of the Armed Forces to request an impartial medical review or rebut medical evaluation board findings. (5) The criteria a medical evaluation board convening authority applies when considering such requests under paragraph (4). (6) The average time to process Integrated Disability Evaluation System cases by both phase and stage (as defined in Department of Defense Manual 1332.18) for both the active component and reserve component. 745. Review and report on prevention of suicide among members of the Armed Forces stationed at remote installations outside the contiguous United States (a) Review required The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a review of efforts by the Department of Defense to prevent suicide among members of the Armed Forces stationed at covered installations. (b) Elements of review The review conducted under subsection (a) shall include an assessment of each of the following: (1) Current policy guidelines of the Armed Forces on the prevention of suicide among members of the Armed Forces stationed at covered installations. (2) Current suicide prevention programs of the Armed Forces and activities for members of the Armed Forces stationed at covered installations and their dependents, including programs provided by the Defense Health Program and the Office of Suicide Prevention. (3) The integration of mental health screenings and suicide risk and prevention efforts for members of the Armed Forces stationed at covered installations and their dependents into the delivery of primary care for such members and dependents. (4) The standards for responding to attempted or completed suicides among members of the Armed Forces stationed at covered installations and their dependents, including guidance and training to assist commanders in addressing incidents of attempted or completed suicide within their units. (5) The standards regarding data collection for members of the Armed Forces stationed at covered installations and their dependents, including related factors such as domestic violence and child abuse. (6) The means to ensure the protection of privacy of members of the Armed Forces stationed at covered installations and their dependents who seek or receive treatment related to suicide prevention. (7) The availability of information from indigenous populations on suicide prevention for members of the Armed Forces stationed at covered installations who are members of such a population. (8) The availability of information from graduate research programs of institutions of higher education on suicide prevention for members of the Armed Forces. (9) Such other matters as the Comptroller General considers appropriate in connection with the prevention of suicide among members of the Armed Forces stationed at covered installations and their dependents. (c) Briefing and report The Comptroller General shall— (1) not later than October 1, 2021, brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on preliminary observations relating to the review conducted under subsection (a); and (2) not later than March 1, 2022, submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the results of such review. (d) Covered installation defined In this section, the term covered installation E Mental health services from Department of Veterans Affairs for members of reserve components 751. Short title This subtitle may be cited as the Care and Readiness Enhancement for Reservists Act of 2020 CARE for Reservists Act of 2020 752. Expansion of eligibility for readjustment counseling and related outpatient services from Department of Veterans Affairs to include members of reserve components of the Armed Forces (a) Readjustment counseling Subsection (a)(1) of section 1712A of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (D) (i) The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, may furnish to any member of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who has a behavioral health condition or psychological trauma, counseling under subparagraph (A)(i), which may include a comprehensive individual assessment under subparagraph (B)(i). (ii) A member of the reserve components of the Armed Forces described in clause (i) shall not be required to obtain a referral before being furnished counseling or an assessment under this subparagraph. . (b) Outpatient services Subsection (b) of such section is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) by inserting to an individual If, on the basis of the assessment furnished (B) by striking veteran individual (2) in paragraph (2), by striking veteran individual (c) Effective Date The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date that is one year after the date of the enactment of this Act. 753. Provision of mental health services from Department of Veterans Affairs to members of reserve components of the Armed Forces (a) In general Subchapter VIII of chapter 17 1789. Mental health services for members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, may furnish mental health services to members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1788 the following new item: 1789. Mental health services for members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces. . 754. Inclusion of members of reserve components in mental health programs of Department of Veterans Affairs (a) Suicide prevention program (1) In general Section 1720F of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (l) (1) Covered individual defined In this section, the term covered individual (2) In determining coverage of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces under the comprehensive program, the Secretary shall consult with the Secretary of Defense. . (2) Conforming amendments Such section is further amended— (A) in subsection (a), by striking veterans covered individuals (B) in subsection (b), by striking veterans covered individuals (C) in subsection (c)— (i) in the subsection heading, by striking of veterans (ii) by striking veterans covered individuals (iii) by striking veteran individual (D) in subsection (d), by striking to veterans to covered individuals (E) in subsection (e), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking veterans covered individuals (F) in subsection (f)— (i) in the first sentence, by striking veterans covered individuals (ii) in the second sentence, by inserting or members veterans (G) in subsection (g), by striking veterans covered individuals (H) in subsection (h), by striking veterans covered individuals (I) in subsection (i)— (i) in the subsection heading, by striking for veterans and families (ii) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking veterans and the families of veterans covered individuals and the families of covered individuals (iii) in paragraph (2), by striking veterans covered individuals (iv) in paragraph (4), by striking veterans covered individuals (J) in subsection (j)— (i) in paragraph (1), by striking veterans covered individuals (ii) in paragraph (4)— (I) in subparagraph (A), in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking women veterans covered individuals who are women (II) in subparagraph (B), by striking women veterans who covered individuals who are women and (III) in subparagraph (C), by striking women veterans covered individuals who are women (K) in subsection (k), by striking veterans covered individuals (3) Clerical amendments (A) In general Such section is further amended, in the section heading, by inserting and members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces veterans (B) Table of sections The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by striking the item relating to section 1720F and inserting the following new item: 1720F. Comprehensive program for suicide prevention among veterans and members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces. . (b) Mental health treatment for individuals who served in classified missions (1) In general Section 1720H of such title is amended— (A) in subsection (a)— (i) in paragraph (1)— (I) by striking eligible veteran eligible individual (II) by striking the veteran the individual (ii) in paragraph (3), by striking eligible veterans eligible individuals (B) in subsection (b)— (i) by striking a veteran an individual (ii) by striking eligible veteran eligible individual (C) in subsection (c)— (i) in paragraph (2), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking The term eligible veteran The term eligible individual (ii) in paragraph (3), by striking eligible veteran eligible individual (2) Clerical amendments (A) In general Such section is further amended, in the section heading, by inserting and members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces veterans (B) Table of sections The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 17 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 1720H and inserting the following new item: 1720H. Mental health treatment for veterans and members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who served in classified missions. . 755. Report on mental health and related services provided by Department of Veterans Affairs to members of the Armed Forces (a) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report that includes an assessment of the following: (1) The increase, as compared to the day before the date of the enactment of this Act, of the number of members of the Armed Forces that use readjustment counseling or outpatient mental health care from the Department of Veterans Affairs, disaggregated by State, Vet Center location, and clinical care site of the Department, as appropriate. (2) The number of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces receiving telemental health care from the Department. (3) The increase, as compared to the day before the date of the enactment of this Act, of the annual cost associated with readjustment counseling and outpatient mental health care provided by the Department to members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces. (4) The changes, as compared to the day before the date of the enactment of this Act, in staffing, training, organization, and resources required for the Department to offer readjustment counseling and outpatient mental health care to members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces. (5) Any challenges the Department has encountered in providing readjustment counseling and outpatient mental health care to members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces. (b) Vet Center defined In this section, the term Vet Center VIII Acquisition Policy, Acquisition Management, and Related Matters A Acquisition Policy and Management 801. Congressional notification of termination of a middle tier acquisition program Section 804 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( Public Law 114–92 10 U.S.C. 2302 (e) Report Not later than 30 days after the date of termination of an acquisition program commenced using the authority under this section, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a notification of such termination. Such notice shall include— (1) the initial amount of a contract awarded under such acquisition program; (2) the aggregate amount of funds awarded under such contract; and (3) written documentation of the reason for termination of such acquisition program. . 802. Modification to the definition of nontraditional defense contractor Section 2302(9) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (9) the term nontraditional defense contractor (A) an entity that is not currently performing and has not performed, for at least the one-year period preceding the solicitation of sources by the Department of Defense for the procurement or transaction, any contract or subcontract for the Department of Defense that is subject to full coverage under the cost accounting standards prescribed pursuant to section 1502 of title 41 and the regulations implementing such section; or (B) a corporation all of the stock of which is owned by an employee stock ownership plan (as defined in section 4975(e)(7) . 803. Major weapon systems: life-cycle sustainment plan (a) In general Chapter 139 section 2366c 2366d. Major weapon systems: life-cycle sustainment plans (a) Requirement Before granting Milestone C approval for a major weapon system acquired pursuant to a major defense acquisition program, the milestone decision authority for such program shall submit to the Secretary a life-cycle sustainment plan. (b) Elements A life-cycle sustainment plan required under subsection (a) shall include— (1) a sustainment plan that includes the product support strategy, performance, and operation and support costs of the major weapon system; (2) metrics to measure readiness and availability of the major weapon system to perform its intended purpose or function; (3) a schedule for the major maintenance and overhaul activities that will be required during the life cycle of the major weapon system; and (4) a sustainment baseline cost estimate for the planned life cycle of the major weapon system that includes a technical data and intellectual property management plan that clearly delineates which subsystems of the major weapon system are Government-owned or Government-required and which subsystems are owned by a prime contractor or subcontractor (at any tier). (c) Review The Secretary of Defense shall review a life-cycle sustainment plan submitted under subsection (a) 5 years after the receipt of Milestone C approval described in such subsection, and every 10 years thereafter, to ensure that the major weapon system is cost effective and is able to meet required metrics relating to readiness and availability of such system. (d) Notification requirements (1) In general Not later than 45 days after a significant and critical breach of a sustainment baseline cost estimate of a life-cycle sustainment plan for a major weapon system acquired pursuant to a major defense acquisition program, the Secretary of the military department that is managing such program shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notification of such breach. (2) Review Not later than 180 days after submitting a notification under paragraph (1), such Secretary shall review the sustainment costs of the major weapon system to which such notification relates relative to the sustainment baseline cost estimate. (3) Additional submission Such Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees— (A) a certification that the review required under paragraph (2) has been completed; and (B) a remediation plan or endorsement by such Secretary that the sustainment cost growth is justified and required for such Secretary to meet the requirements related to the major defense acquisition program. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) Major defense acquisition program The term major defense acquisition program (2) Major weapon system The term major weapon system (3) Milestone C approval The term Milestone C approval (4) Sustainment baseline cost estimate The term sustainment baseline cost estimate . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 139 section 2366c 2366d. Major weapon systems: life-cycle sustainment plans. . 804. Contractor business systems Section 893 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 ( Public Law 111–383 10 U.S.C. 2302 (1) in subsection (b)— (A) in paragraph (2), by striking significant deficiencies deficiencies and material weaknesses (B) in paragraph (4), by striking significant deficiency material weakness (C) in paragraph (5)(A), by striking significant deficiency material weakness (2) in subsection (d)(1), by striking significant deficiencies material weaknesses (3) in subsection (g)— (A) in paragraph (3), by striking significant deficiency material weakness (B) by striking paragraph (4); (C) by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (4); and (D) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (5) The term material weakness . 805. Acquisition authority of the Director of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (a) Authority (1) In general The Director of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center shall be responsible for, and shall have the authority to conduct, the following covered activities: (A) Development and acquisition of artificial intelligence technologies, services, and capabilities. (B) Sustainment of artificial intelligence technologies, services, and capabilities. (2) Acquisition functions Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense, the Director shall have authority to exercise the functions of a head of an agency (as defined in section 2302 of title 10, United States Code) with respect to a covered activity described in paragraph (1). (b) JAIC acquisition executive (1) In general The staff of the Director shall include an acquisition executive who shall be responsible for the supervision of covered activities under subsection (a). The acquisition executive shall have the authority— (A) to negotiate memoranda of agreement with any element of the Department of Defense to carry out the acquisition of technologies, services, and capabilities described in subsection (a)(1) on behalf of the Center; (B) to supervise the acquisition of technologies, services, and capabilities described in subsection (a)(1); (C) to represent the Center in discussions with military departments regarding acquisition programs relating to covered activities for which the Center is involved; and (D) to work with the military departments to ensure that the Center is appropriately represented in any joint working group or integrated product team regarding acquisition programs relating to covered activities for which the Center is involved. (2) Delivery of acquisition solutions The acquisition executive of the Center shall be— (A) responsible to the Director for rapidly delivering acquisition solutions to meet validated artificial intelligence requirements; (B) subordinate to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment in matters of acquisition; (C) subject to the same oversight as the service acquisition executives; and (D) included on the distribution list for acquisition directives and instructions of the Department of Defense. (c) Acquisition personnel (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall provide the Center with ten full-time employees to support the Director in carrying out the requirements of this section. Such employees shall have experience in— (A) program acquisition; (B) the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System process; (C) program management; (D) system engineering; and (E) cost analysis. (2) Existing personnel The personnel provided under this subsection shall be provided from among the existing personnel of the Department of Defense. (d) Budget Any budget proposal of the Center for funding for any covered activity described under subsection (a) shall be disaggregated by the amount requested for each covered activity. (e) Funding In exercising the authority granted in subsection (a), the Director may not obligate or expend more than $150,000,000 out of the funds made available in each of fiscal years 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025 to enter into new contracts to support covered activities carried out under this section. (f) Implementation plan required (1) In general The Secretary of Defense may use the authority granted under subsection (a) 30 days after the date on which the Secretary provides to the congressional defense committees a plan for implementation such authority. The plan shall include the following: (A) A Department of Defense-wide definition of artificial intelligence technologies, services, and capabilities. (B) Summaries of the components to be negotiated in any memoranda of agreement with an element of the Department of Defense to carry out covered activities described under subsection (a). (C) Timelines for the negotiation and approval of any such memorandum of agreement. (D) Plan for oversight of the position of acquisition executive established in subsection (b). (E) Assessment of the acquisition workforce needs of the Center to support the authority in subsection (a) until September 30, 2025. (F) Other matters as appropriate. (2) Relationship to other authorities The requirement to submit a plan under this subsection is in addition to the requirements under section 260 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (g) Sunset Effective October 1, 2025, the Director may not exercise the authority under subsection (a) and may not enter into any new contracts under this section. The performance on any contract entered into before such date may continue according to the terms of such contract. (h) Definitions In this section: (1) Center The term Center Establishment of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (2) Covered activity The term covered activity (A) means an acquisition activity conducted using the authority under this section; and (B) does not include— (i) a major defense acquisition program (as defined in section 2430 of title 10, United States Code); or (ii) a procurement of technologies related to artificial intelligence, if the duration of such procurement is expected to be greater than five years. (3) Director The term Director (4) Element The term element (5) Military departments The term military departments (6) Service acquisition executive The term service acquisition executive 806. Reforming the Department of Defense (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall take such action as necessary to reform the Department of Defense to provide more effective, efficient, and economical administration and operation, and to eliminate duplication. (b) National defense strategy Each national defense strategy required by section 113(g) of title 10, United States Code, shall include a description of the reform efforts described under subsection (a). (c) Defense Planning Guidance The annual Defense Planning Guidance (as described in section 113(g)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code) shall include an explanation of how the Department of Defense will carry out the reform efforts described under subsection (a). (d) Defense authorization request The Secretary of Defense shall include in the annual defense authorization request (as defined in section 113a of title 10, United States Code) a description of the savings from implementing the reform efforts described under subsection (a). Such description— (1) shall be set forth separately from requested amounts; (2) may not include savings relating to the deferment of requirements or taking of risk; (3) shall be identified across the future-years defense plan; and (4) shall provide a comparison with the savings in the annual defense authorization request from the prior year. (e) Policy The Secretary of Defense shall develop a policy and issue guidance to implement reform within the Department of Defense in order to provide more effective, efficient, and economical administration and operations, and to eliminate duplication. (f) Report The Secretary of Defense shall report annually to Congress on the expenditures, work, and accomplishments of the Department of Defense during the period covered by the report, together with a report on the reform efforts described under subsection (a). (g) Military departments Each Secretary of a military department shall— (1) take such action as necessary to reform the military department to provide more effective, efficient, and economical administration and operations, and to eliminate duplication; and (2) develop a policy and issue guidance to implement reform within the military department in order to provide more effective, efficient, and economical administration and operations, and to eliminate duplication. (h) Combatant commands Each commander of a combatant command shall provide the Secretary of Defense with recommendations to reform the combatant command of such commander to provide more effective, efficient, and economical administration and operations, and to eliminate duplication. 807. Alternative Space Acquisition System for the United States Space Force (a) Milestone decision authority for major defense acquisition programs and major systems (1) Program executive officer The Secretary of the Air Force may assign an appropriate program executive officer as the milestone decision authority for major defense acquisition programs of the United States Space Force. (2) Program manager The program executive officer assigned under paragraph (1) may delegate authority over major systems to an appropriate program manager. (b) Alternative Space Acquisition System (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall take such actions necessary to develop an acquisition pathway within the Department of Defense to be known as the Alternative Space Acquisition System (2) Goal The goal of the Alternative Space Acquisition System shall be to quickly and effectively acquire space warfighting capabilities needed to address the requirements of the national defense strategy (as defined under section 113(g) of title 10, United States Code). (3) Report Not later than January 15, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the Alternative Space Acquisition System that includes the following: (A) Proposed United States Space Force budget line items for fiscal year 2022, including— (i) a comparison with budget line items for major defense acquisition programs and major systems of the United States Space Force for three previous fiscal years; and (ii) measures to ensure sufficient transparency related to the performance of the Alternative Space Acquisition System and opportunities to oversee funding priorities for the Alternative Space Acquisition System; (B) Proposed revised, flexible, and streamlined options for joint requirements validation in order to be more responsive and innovative, while ensuring the ability of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to ensure top-level system requirements are properly prioritized to address joint warfighting needs; (C) A list of acquisition programs of the United States Space Force for which multiyear procurement authorities are recommended. (D) A list of space acquisition programs that may be able to use existing alternative acquisition pathways. (E) Policies for a new Alternative Space Acquisition System with specific acquisition key decision points and reporting requirements for development, fielding, and sustainment activities that meets the requirements of the adaptive acquisition framework (as described in Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02, Operation of the Adaptive Acquisition Framework (F) Updated determination authority for procurement of useable end items that are not weapon systems. (G) Policies and a governance structure for a separate United States Space Force budget topline, corporate process, and portfolio management process. (H) An analysis of the risks and benefits of the delegation of the authority of the head of contracting activity authority to the Chief of Space Operations in a manner that would not expand the operations of the United States Space Force. (c) Comptroller General Review Not later than 60 days after the submission of the report required under subsection (b)(3), the Comptroller General of the United States shall review such report and submit to the congressional defense committees an analysis and recommendations based on such report . (d) Definitions In this section: (1) Major defense acquisition program The term major defense acquisition program (2) Major system The term major system (3) Milestone decision authority The term milestone decision authority (4) Program executive officer; program manager The terms program executive officer program manager B Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and Limitations 811. Sustainment reform for the Department of Defense (a) Sustainment activities in the national defense strategy (1) In general Section 113(g)(1)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (vii) A strategic framework prescribed by the Secretary that guides how the Department will prioritize and integrate activities relating to sustainment of major defense acquisition programs, core logistics capabilities (as described under section 2464 of this title), and the national technology and industrial base (as defined in section 2500 of this title). . (2) Duties of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment Section 133b(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) in paragraph (7), by striking and (B) in paragraph (8), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and (C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (9) advising the Secretary on all aspects of acquisition and sustainment relating to— (A) major defense acquisition programs; (B) core logistics capabilities (as described under section 2464 of this title); (C) the national technology and industrial base (as defined in section 2500 of this title); and (D) the development of the strategic framework described in section 113(g)(1)(B)(vii) of this title. . (3) Interim guidance Not later than October 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall publish interim guidance to carry out the requirements of this subsection. (b) Report Not later than February 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the progress towards publishing the interim guidance required under subsection (a)(3). 812. Modifications to Comptroller General assessment of acquisition programs and related initiatives Section 2229b(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking a summary of discussion of the a discussion of selected organizational, policy, and legislative changes, as determined appropriate by the Comptroller General, and the potential 813. Contractor whistleblower protections relating to nondisclosure agreements (a) Department of Defense contractors (1) In general Section 2409(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) This section applies to any disclosure made by an employee of a contractor, subcontractor, grantee, or subgrantee or personal services contractor whether or not such employee has signed, or is subject to, a nondisclosure policy, form, or agreement with such contractor, subcontractor, grantee, or subgrantee or personal services contractor. . (2) Notification of employees Section 2409(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) by striking inform submit to the Secretary or Administrator (as applicable) a certification stating that such contractor or subcontrator has informed (B) by inserting (including the applicability of such rights and remedies if such an employee has signed, or is subject to, a nondisclosure policy, form, or agreement) under this section (3) Application With respect to a nondisclosure policy, form, or agreement between a covered contractor and a covered employee that was in effect before the effective date of this Act, paragraph (4) of section 2409(a) of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), shall apply if a covered contractor has provided notice to a covered employee of the rights and remedies of the covered employee relating to a nondisclosure policy, form, or agreement under section 2409(d) of such title, as amended by paragraph (2). (4) Website update The Inspector General of the Department of Defense and the Inspector General of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration shall update any relevant websites to include information about this subsection and the amendments made by this subsection. (5) Definitions In this subsection: (A) Covered contractor The term covered contractor (B) Covered employee The term covered employee (b) Other Government contractors (1) In general Section 4712(a) of title 41, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) Effect of a nondisclosure policy, form, or agreement This section applies to any disclosure made by an employee of a contractor, subcontractor, grantee, or subgrantee or personal services contractor whether or not such employee has signed, or is subject to, a nondisclosure policy, form, or agreement with such contractor, subcontractor, grantee, or subgrantee or personal services contractor. . (2) Notification of employees Section 4712(d) of title 41, United States Code, is amended— (A) by striking inform submit to the applicable head of each executive agency a certification stating that such contractor or subcontrator has informed (B) by inserting (including the applicability of such rights and remedies if such an employee has signed, or is subject to, a nondisclosure policy, form, or agreement) under this section (3) Application With respect to a nondisclosure policy, form, or agreement between a covered contractor and a covered employee that was in effect before the effective date of this Act, paragraph (4) of section 4712(a) of title 41, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), shall apply if a covered contractor has provided notice to a covered employee of the rights and remedies of the covered employee relating to a nondisclosure policy, form, or agreement under section 4712(d) of such title, as amended by paragraph (2). (4) Website update Each Inspector General (as defined in section 4712(g) of title 41, United States Code) shall update any relevant websites to include information about this subsection and the amendments made by this subsection. (5) Definitions In this subsection: (A) Covered contractor The term covered contractor (B) Covered employee The term covered employee (c) Notification and remedies (1) Notification A covered contractor shall inform the contracting officer responsible for any contracts of such covered contractor— (A) if a person engaged in the performance of any such contract has been subjected to a reprisal prohibited by section 2409(a) of title 10, United States Code, or section 4712(a) of title 41, United States Code, where such reprisal has been substantiated; (B) any investigation of a complaint relating to any such contract conducted by an Inspector General pursuant to section 2409(b) of title 10, United States Code, or section 4712(b) of title 41, United States Code; and (C) any action taken by a covered contractor or a covered employee for any such contract to address a substantiated reprisal described in subparagraph (A). (2) Remedies In addition to other remedies available, if a covered contractor fails to comply with the requirements of paragraph (1), the relevant head of a Federal agency may— (A) require the covered contractor to prohibit a covered employee from performing a contract if such covered employee has violated section 2409(a) of title 10, United States Code, or section 4712(a) of title 41, United States Code; (B) require the covered contractor to terminate a subcontract if the subcontractor for such subcontract has violated such sections; (C) suspend payments to a covered contractor until such covered contractor has taken appropriate remedial action. (3) Definitions In this subsection: (A) Covered contractor The term covered contractor (i) with respect to a contract of the Department of Defense or the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, a contractor, grantee, or personal services contractor; and (ii) with respect to a Federal contract or grant (as defined for purposes of division C of title 41), a contractor, grantee, or personal services contractor for such a Federal contract or grant. (B) Covered employee The term covered employee (d) Training The Administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy shall update any required training for Federal employees responsible for contract oversight relating to— (1) contracting certification requirements; (2) processes for receiving a complaint from a person alleging discrimination as a reprisal for disclosing information under section 2409(a) of title 10, United States Code, or section 4712(a) of title 41, United States Code; and (3) prohibitions on contracting with entities that require confidentiality agreements. 814. Competition requirements for purchases from Federal Prison Industries (a) Competition requirements for purchases from Federal Prison Industries Subsections (a) and (b) of section 2410n of title 10, United States Code, are amended to read as follows: (a) Market research Before purchasing a product listed in the latest edition of the Federal Prison Industries catalog published under section 4124(d) of title 18, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct market research to determine whether such product— (1) is comparable to products available from the private sector; and (2) best meets the needs of the Department of Defense in terms of price, quality, and time of delivery. (b) Competition requirement If the Secretary determines that a Federal Prison Industries product is not comparable to products available from the private sector and does not best meet the needs of the Department of Defense in terms of price, quality, or time of delivery, the Secretary shall use competitive procedures or make an individual purchase under a multiple award contract for the procurement of the product. In conducting such a competition or making such a purchase, the Secretary shall consider a timely offer from Federal Prison Industries. . (b) Effective date The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 815. Disclosure of beneficial owners in database for Federal agency contract and grant officers Section 2313(d)(3) of title 41, United States Code, is amended by inserting , and an identification of any beneficial owner of such corporation, to the corporation 816. Inclusion of optical transmission components in the analytical framework for supply chain risks Section 2509(b)(2)(A)(ii) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking (other than optical transmission components) 817. Amendment to definition of qualified apprentice Section 2870(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting or (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ; or (3) by striking paragraph (3). 818. Contract closeout authority for services contracts Section 836 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( 10 U.S.C. 2302 (1) by amending subsection (b)(1) to read as follows: (1) was entered into— (A) with respect to a contract or group of contracts for services, on a date that is the later of— (i) at least 7 fiscal years before the current fiscal year; and (ii) the number of years applicable to the contract or group of contracts in subpart 4.7 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (as in effect on April 1, 2020); (B) with respect to a contract or group of contracts not described in subparagraph (A), on a date that is at least 17 fiscal years before the current fiscal year; ; (2) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (g) and (h), respectively; and (3) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection: (f) Oversight The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of the Defense Contract Management Agency, shall establish and maintain a centralized capability with necessary expertise and resources to provide oversight of the closeout of a contract or group of contracts covered by this section. . 819. Plan to improve Department-wide management of investments in weapon systems (a) Portfolio management plan The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in coordination with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, to develop a plan to identify, develop, and acquire databases, analytical and financial tools, and workforce skills to improve the Department of Defense-wide assessment, management, and optimization of the investments in weapon systems of the Department, including through consolidation of duplicate or similar weapon system programs. (b) Plan contents The plan developed under subsection (a) shall— (1) describe the databases and analytical and financial tools in use by the Department of Defense that may be used to support the Department-wide assessment, management, and optimization of the investments in weapon systems of the Department; (2) determine the database and analytical and financial tool requirements that must be met, and the workforce skills necessary, for more effective Department-wide reviews, analyses, and management by the Secretary of the investments in weapon systems of the Department; (3) identify the skills described in paragraph (2) that are possessed by the workforce of the Department; (4) identify the databases and analytical and financial tools to be modified, developed, or acquired to improve the Department-wide reviews, analyses, and management of the investments in weapon systems of the Department; and (5) set forth a timeline for implementing the plan, including a timeline for the modification, development, and acquisition of each database and analytical and financial tool identified under paragraph (4). (c) Submission to Congress (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress the plan developed under subsection (a). (2) Form The plan submitted under paragraph (1) shall be in an unclassified form but may contain a classified annex. C Industrial Base Matters 821. Quarterly national technology and industrial base briefings (a) In general Section 2504 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking The Secretary (a) Annual report The Secretary ; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (b) Quarterly briefings (1) The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the congressional defense committees receive quarterly briefings on the progress of the Department of Defense to address the prioritized list of gaps or vulnerabilities in the national technology and industrial base described in subsection (a)(3)(B) as follows: (A) One quarterly briefing per year shall be provided by the Secretary of the Army. (B) One quarterly briefing per year shall be provided by the Secretary of the Navy. (C) One quarterly briefing per year shall be provided by the Secretary of the Air Force. (D) One quarterly briefing per year shall be provided by all appropriate heads of the Defense Agencies identified under subsection (a)(3)(B)(ii). (2) Each briefing under paragraph (1) shall include an update of the progress of addressing such gaps or vulnerabilities by the Secretary concerned or the appropriate head of a Defense Agency, including an update on— (A) actions taken to address such gaps or vulnerabilities; (B) the mitigation strategies necessary to address such gaps or vulnerabilities; and (C) the proposed timeline for action to address such gaps or vulnerabilities. . (b) Conforming and clerical amendments (1) Heading amendment The heading of section 2504 of such title is amended to read as follows: 2504. National technology and industrial base: annual report and quarterly briefings . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections for subchapter II of chapter 148 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2504 and inserting the following new item: 2504. National technology and industrial base: annual report and quarterly briefing. . 822. Expansion on the prohibition on acquiring certain metal products (a) In general Section 2533c of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking material melted material mined, refined, separated, melted, (2) in subsection (c)(3)(A)(i), by striking tungsten covered material (b) Effective date The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is three years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 823. Requirement that certain ship components be manufactured in the national technology and industrial base (a) Technical amendment The second subsection (k) of section 2534 of title 10, United States Code (relating to Implementation of Auxiliary Ship Component Limitation), is redesignated as subsection (l). (b) Components for auxiliary ships Section 2534(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (6) Components for auxiliary ships Subject to subsection (l), the following components: (A) Large medium-speed diesel engines. (B) Auxiliary equipment, including pumps, for all shipboard services. (C) Propulsion system components, including engines, reduction gears, and propellers. (D) Shipboard cranes. (E) Spreaders for shipboard cranes. . (c) Implementation Subsection (l) of section 2534 of title 10, United States Code, as redesignated by subsection (a), is amended— (1) by redesignating the second sentence to appear as flush text at the end; (2) by striking auxiliary ship after the date auxiliary ship— (1) with respect to large medium-speed diesel engines described under subparagraph (A) of such subsection, after the date ; (3) in paragraph (1) (as so designated), by striking Navy. Navy; and (4) by inserting after paragraph (1) (as so designated) the following new paragraph: (2) with respect to components listed in subparagraphs (B) through (E) of such subsection, after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 using funds available for National Defense Sealift Fund programs or Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy. . 824. Preference for sourcing rare earth materials from the national technology and industrial base The Secretary of Defense shall, to the maximum extent practicable, acquire materials that are determined to be strategic and critical materials required to meet the defense, industrial, and essential civilian needs of the United States in the following order of preference: (1) From sources located within the United States. (2) From sources located within the national technology and industrial base (as defined in section 2500 of title 10, United States Code). (3) From other sources as appropriate. 825. Enhanced domestic content requirement for major defense acquisition programs (a) Assessment required (1) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the domestic source content of any procurement carried out in connection with major defense acquisition programs. (2) Information repository The Secretary of Defense shall establish an information repository for the collection and analysis of information related to domestic source content that can be used for continuous data analysis and program management activities. (b) Enhanced domestic content requirement (1) In general For purposes of chapter 83 (A) not later than October 1, 2021, comprise 75 percent of the manufactured articles, materials, or supplies; (B) not later than October 1, 2022, comprise 80 percent of the manufactured articles, materials, or supplies; (C) not later than October 1, 2023, comprise 85 percent of the manufactured articles, materials, or supplies; (D) not later than October 1, 2024, comprise 90 percent of the manufactured articles, materials, or supplies; (E) not later than October 1, 2025, comprise 95 percent of the manufactured articles, materials, or supplies; and (F) not later than October 1, 2026, comprise 100 percent of the manufactured articles, materials, or supplies. (2) Waiver Before Milestone A approval (as defined in section 2366a(d) of title 10, United States Code) is granted for a major defense acquisition program, the Secretary of Defense shall determine whether or not to grant a waiver of the requirements of paragraph (1). (3) Effective date The domestic content requirement under paragraph (1) applies to contracts entered into on or after October 1, 2021. (c) Major defense acquisition program defined In this section, the term major defense acquisition program 826. Additional requirements pertaining to printed circuit boards (a) Purchases Beginning in fiscal year 2023, the Secretary of Defense shall require that any contractor or subcontractor that provides covered printed circuit boards for use by the Department of Defense to certify that, of the total value of the covered printed circuit boards provided by such contractor or subcontractor pursuant to a contract with the Department of Defense, not less than the percentages set forth in subsection (b) were manufactured and assembled within a covered country. (b) Implementation In making a certification under subsection (a), a contractor or subcontractor shall use the following percentages: (1) During fiscal years 2023 through 2027, the greater of— (A) 50 percent; or (B) 75 percent, if the Secretary of Defense has determined that suppliers in covered countries are capable of supplying 75 percent of Department of Defense requirements for printed circuit boards. (2) During fiscal years 2028 through 2032, the greater of— (A) 75 percent; or (B) 100 percent, if the Secretary of Defense has determined that suppliers in covered countries are capable of supplying 100 percent of Department of Defense requirements for printed circuit boards. (3) Beginning in fiscal year 2033, 100 percent. (c) Remediation (1) In general In the event that a contractor or subcontractor is unable to make the certification required under subsection (a), the Secretary may accept covered printed circuit boards from such contractor or subcontractor for up to one year while requiring the contractor to complete a remediation plan. Such a plan shall be submitted to the congressional defense committees and shall require the contractor or subcontractor that failed to make the certification required under subsection (a) to— (A) audit its supply chain to identify any areas of security vulnerability and noncompliance with section 224 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (B) meet the requirements of subsection (a) within one year after the initial missed certification deadline. (2) Restriction No contractor or subcontractor that has supplied covered printed circuit boards while under a remediation plan shall be eligible to enter into another remediation plan under subsection (c) for a period of five years. (d) Waiver The Secretary of Defense may waive the requirement under subsection (a) with respect to a contractor or subcontractor if the Secretary determines that— (1) there are no significant national security concerns regarding counterfeiting, quality, or unauthorized access created by accepting covered printed circuit boards under such waiver; and (2) the contractor is otherwise in compliance with all relevant cybersecurity provisions relating to members of the defense industrial base, including section 224 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (e) Availability exception Subsection (a) shall not apply to the extent that the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the military department concerned determines that covered printed circuit boards of satisfactory quality and sufficient quantity, in the required form, cannot be procured as and when needed from covered countries. (f) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered country The term covered country (A) the United States; or (B) a foreign country whose government has a memorandum of understanding or agreement with the United States that— (i) where applicable, complies with the requirements of section 36 of the Arms Export Control Act ( 22 U.S.C. 2776 (ii) either— (I) requires the United States to purchase supplies from foreign sources for the purposes of offsetting sales made the by United States Government or United States firms under approved programs serving defense requirements; or (II) under which the United States and such government agree to remove barriers to purchase supplies produced in such foreign country or services performed by sources of such foreign country. (2) Covered printed circuit board (A) In general The term covered printed circuit board (i) a product that is not a commercial product (as defined in section 103 of title 41, United States Code); or (ii) a commercial product (as defined in section 103 of title 41, United States Code), other than a commercially available off-the-shelf item (as defined in section 104 of title 41, United States Code) not described in subparagraph (B). (B) Commercially available off-the-shelf items described The commercially available off-the-shelf items (as defined in section 104 of title 41, United States Code) described in this subparagraph are such items that are acquired under a contract with an award value that is greater than the micro-purchase threshold under section 2338 of title 10, United States Code, for use as an integral component in a system designed for— (i) telecommunications, including data communications and fifth-generation cellular communications; (ii) data storage; (iii) medical applications; (iv) networking; (v) computing; (vi) radar; (vii) munitions; or (viii) any other system that the Secretary of Defense determines should be covered under this section. (3) Subcontractor The term subcontractor 827. Report on use of domestic nonavailability determinations Not later than September 30, 2021, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report to congressional defense committees— (1) describing in detail the use of any waiver or exception by the Department of Defense to the requirements of chapter 83 (2) specifying the type of waiver or exception used; and (3) providing an assessment of the impact on the use of such waivers or exceptions due to the COVID–19 pandemic and associated challenges with investments in domestic sources. 828. Sense of Congress on the prohibition on certain telecommunications and video surveillance services or equipment (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Prohibiting the use of telecommunications and video surveillance products or services from certain Chinese entities within the Federal Government’s supply chain is essential to our national security. (2) Section 889 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (3) Specifically, section 889(a)(1)(B) of such Act, effective August 13, 2020, will prohibit Federal agencies from entering into, extending, or renewing a contract with an entity that uses covered telecommunications and video surveillance equipment or services from designated Chinese companies, including Huawei and ZTE, in their supply chains. (4) As of July 1, 2020, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council has yet to release a draft rule for public comment on the implementation of the prohibitions described in section 889(a)(1)(B) of such Act, leaving Federal agencies and contractors that provide equipment and services to the Federal Government without implementation guidance necessary to adequately plan for or comply with the prohibitions. (5) Belated, and then hurried, implementation of this critical prohibition puts at risk the Federal Government’s ability to acquire essential goods and services and increases vulnerability in the supply chain through inconsistent implementation. (6) A senior Department of Defense leader testified on June 10, 2020, that, I am very concerned about being able to implement [the prohibition] in August, as well as totally comply within two years … I believe we need more time (7) Subsequent to the enactment of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) successful implementation of the prohibition on using or procuring certain telecommunications and video surveillance equipment under section 889 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 chapter 13 (2) the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council shall ensure successful implementation of such prohibition by providing sufficient time for public comment and review of any related rulemaking. D Small Business Matters 831. Transfer of verification of small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans or service-disabled veterans to the Small Business Administration (a) Transfer date For purposes of this section, the term transfer date (1) a certification that such extension is necessary; (2) the rationale for and the length of such extension; and (3) a plan to comply with the requirements of this section within the timeframe of the extension. (b) Amendment to and transfer of veteran-owned and service-disabled veteran-owned business database (1) Amendment of veteran-owned and service-disabled veteran-owned business database Effective on the transfer date, section 8127 of title 38, United States Code, is amended— (A) in subsection (e)— (i) by striking the Secretary the Administrator (ii) by striking subsection (f) section 36 of the Small Business Act (B) in subsection (f)— (i) by striking the Secretary the Administrator (ii) in paragraph (1), by striking small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans with service-connected disabilities small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans (iii) in paragraph (2)— (I) in subparagraph (A), by striking to access to obtain from the Secretary of Veterans Affairs (II) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following: (B) For purposes of this subsection— (i) the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall— (I) verify an individual’s status as a veteran or a service-disabled veteran; and (II) establish a system to permit the Administrator to access, but not alter, such verification; and (ii) the Administrator shall verify— (I) the status of a business concern as a small business concern; and (II) the ownership and control of such business concern. (C) The Administrator may not certify a concern under subsection (b) or section 36A if the Secretary of Veterans Affairs cannot provide the verification described under subparagraph (B)(i)(I). ; (iv) by striking paragraphs (4) and (7); (v) by redesignating paragraphs (5) and (6) as paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively, and redesignating paragraph (8) as paragraph (6); (vi) in paragraph (4), as so redesignated, by striking The Secretary The Administrator (vii) in paragraph (6), as so redesignated— (I) in subparagraph (A)— (aa) by striking verify the status of the concern as a small business concern or the ownership or control of the concern certify the status of the concern as a small business concern owned and controlled by veterans (under section 36A) or a small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans (under section 36(g)) (bb) by striking verification certification (II) in subparagraph (B)— (aa) in clause (i), by striking small business concern owned and controlled by veterans with service-connected disabilities small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans (bb) in clause (ii)— (AA) by amending subclause (I) to read as follows: (I) the Secretary of Veterans Affairs or the Administrator; or ; and (BB) in subclause (II), by striking the contracting officer of the Department the applicable contracting officer (III) by striking subparagraph (C); (C) by redesignating subsection (k) (relating to definitions) as subsection (l); (D) by inserting after subsection (j) (relating to annual reports) the following: (k) Annual transfer for certification costs For each fiscal year, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall reimburse the Administrator in an amount necessary to cover any cost incurred by the Administrator for certifying small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans that do not qualify as small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans for the Secretary for purposes of this section and section 8128 of this title. The Administrator is authorized to accept such reimbursement. The amount of any such reimbursement shall be determined jointly by the Secretary and the Administrator and shall be provided from fees collected by the Secretary under multiple-award schedule contracts. Any disagreement about the amount shall be resolved by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. ; and (E) subsection (l) (relating to definitions), as so redesignated, by adding at the end the following: (4) The term Administrator means the Administrator of the Small Business Administration. . (2) Transfer of requirements relating to database to the Small Business Act Effective on the transfer date, subsection (f) of section 8127 of title 38, United States Code (as amended by paragraph (1)), is transferred to section 36 of the Small Business Act ( 15 U.S.C. 657f (3) Conforming amendments The following amendments shall take effect on the transfer date: (A) Small Business Act Section 3(q)(2)(C)(i)(III) of the Small Business Act ( 15 U.S.C. 632(q)(2)(C)(i)(III) section 8127(f) of title 38, United States Code section 36 (B) Title 38 Section 8128 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking section 8127(f) of this title section 36 of the Small Business Act (c) Additional requirements for database (1) Administration access to database before the transfer date During the period between the date of the enactment of this section and the transfer date, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall provide the Administrator of the Small Business Administration with access to the contents of the database described under section 8127(f) of title 38, United States Code. (2) Rule of construction Nothing in this section or the amendments made by this section may be construed— (A) as prohibiting the Administrator of the Small Business Administration from combining the contents of the database described under section 8127(f) of title 38, United States Code, with other databases maintained by the Administration; or (B) as requiring the Administrator to use any system or technology related to the database described under section 8127(f) of title 38, United States Code, on or after the transfer date to comply with the requirement to maintain a database under subsection (f) of section 36 of the Small Business Act (as transferred pursuant to subsection (b)(2) of this section). (3) Recognition of the issuance of joint regulations The date specified under section 1832(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( 15 U.S.C. 632 (d) Procurement program for small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans (1) Procurement program for small business concerns owned and controlled by service-Disabled veterans Section 36 of the Small Business Act ( 15 U.S.C. 657f (A) by striking subsections (d) and (e); (B) by redesignating subsections (a), (b), and (c) as subsections (c), (d), and (e) respectively; (C) by inserting before subsection (c), as so redesignated, the following: (a) Contracting officer defined For purposes of this section, the term contracting officer (b) Certification of small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans With respect to a procurement program or preference established under this Act that applies to prime contractors, the Administrator shall— (1) certify the status of the concern as a small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans (2) require the periodic recertification of such status. ; (D) in subsection (d), as so redesignated, by striking and that the award can be made at a fair market price , that the award can be made at a fair market price, and if each concern is certified by the Administrator as a small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans (E) by adding at the end the following: (g) Certification requirement Notwithstanding subsection (c), a contracting officer may only award a sole source contract to a small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans or a contract on the basis of competition restricted to small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans if such a concern is certified by the Administrator as a small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans. (h) Enforcement; penalties (1) Verification of eligibility In carrying out this section, the Administrator shall establish procedures relating to— (A) the filing, investigation, and disposition by the Administration of any challenge to the eligibility of a small business concern to receive assistance under this section (including a challenge, filed by an interested party, relating to the veracity of a certification made or information provided to the Administration by a small business concern under subsection (b)); and (B) verification by the Administrator of the accuracy of any certification made or information provided to the Administration by a small business concern under subsection (b). (2) Examinations (A) Examination of applicants The procedures established under paragraph (1) shall provide for a program of examinations by the Administrator of any small business concern making a certification or providing information to the Administrator under subsection (b), to determine the veracity of any statements or information provided as part of such certification or otherwise provided under subsection (b). (B) Examination of certified concerns The procedures established under paragraph (1) shall provide for the examination of risk-based samples of small business concerns certified under subsection (b), or of any small business concern that the Administrator believes poses a particular risk or with respect to which the Administrator receives specific and credible information alleging that the small business concern no longer meets eligibility requirements to be certified as a small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans. (3) Penalties In addition to the penalties described in section 16(d), any small business concern that is determined by the Administrator to have misrepresented the status of that concern as a small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans for purposes of subsection (b), shall be subject to— (A) section 1001 of title 18, United States Code; (B) sections 3729 through 3733 of title 31, United States Code; and (C) section 8127(g) of title 38, United States Code. (i) Provision of data Upon the request of the Administrator, the head of any Federal department or agency shall promptly provide to the Administrator such information as the Administrator determines to be necessary to carry out subsection (b) or to be able to certify the status of the concern as a small business concern owned and controlled by veterans under section 36A. . (2) Penalties for misrepresentation Section 16 of the Small Business Act ( 15 U.S.C. 645 (A) in subsection (d)(1)— (i) by striking , a , a small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans small business concern owned and controlled by veterans (ii) in paragraph (A), by striking 9, 15, or 31 8, 9, 15, 31, 36, or 36A (B) in subsection (e), by striking , a , a small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans small business concern owned and controlled by veterans (e) Certification for small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans The Small Business Act ( 15 U.S.C. 631 36A. Certification of small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans (a) In general With respect to the program established under section 8127 of title 38, United States Code, the Administrator shall— (1) certify the status of the concern as a small business concern owned and controlled by veterans (2) require the periodic recertification of such status. (b) Enforcement; penalties (1) Verification of eligibility In carrying out this section, the Administrator shall establish procedures relating to— (A) the filing, investigation, and disposition by the Administration of any challenge to the eligibility of a small business concern to receive assistance under this section (including a challenge, filed by an interested party, relating to the veracity of a certification made or information provided to the Administration by a small business concern under subsection (a)); and (B) verification by the Administrator of the accuracy of any certification made or information provided to the Administration by a small business concern under subsection (a). (2) Examination of applicants The procedures established under paragraph (1) shall provide for a program of examinations by the Administrator of any small business concern making a certification or providing information to the Administrator under subsection (a), to determine the veracity of any statements or information provided as part of such certification or otherwise provided under subsection (a). (3) Penalties In addition to the penalties described in section 16(d), any small business concern that is determined by the Administrator to have misrepresented the status of that concern as a small business concern owned and controlled by veterans for purposes of subsection (a), shall be subject to— (A) section 1001 of title 18, United States Code; (B) sections 3729 through 3733 of title 31, United States Code; and (C) section 8127(g) of title 38, United States Code. . (f) Status of self-certified small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans (1) In general Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any small business concern that self-certified as a small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans shall— (A) if the concern files a certification application with the Administrator of the Small Business Administration before the end of the 1-year period beginning on the transfer date, maintain such self-certification until the Administrator makes a determination with respect to such certification; and (B) if the concern does not file such a certification application before the end of the 1-year period beginning on the transfer date, lose, at the end of such 1-year period, any self-certification of the concern as a small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans. (2) Non-Applicability to Department of Veterans Affairs Paragraph (1) shall not apply to participation in contracts (including subcontracts) with the Department of Veterans Affairs. (3) Notice The Administrator shall notify any small business concern that self-certified as a small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans about the requirements of this section, including the transfer date and any extension of such transfer date made pursuant to subsection (a), and make such notice publicly available, on— (A) the date of the enactment of this section; and (B) the date on which an extension described under subsection (a) is approved. (g) Transfer of the Center for Verification and Evaluation of the Department of Veterans Affairs to the Small Business Administration (1) Abolishment The Center for Verification and Evaluation of the Department of Veterans Affairs defined under section 74.1 of title 38, Code of Federal Regulations, is abolished effective on the transfer date. (2) Transfer of functions All functions that, immediately before the effective date of this subsection, were functions of the Center for Verification and Evaluation shall— (A) on the date of enactment of this section, be functions of both the Center for Verification and Evaluation and the Small Business Administration, except that the Small Business Administration shall not have any authority to carry out any verification functions of the Center for Verification and Evaluation; and (B) on the transfer date, be functions of the Small Business Administration. (3) Transfer of assets So much of the personnel, property, and records employed, used, held, available, or to be made available in connection with a function transferred under this subsection shall be available to the Small Business Administration at such time or times as the President directs for use in connection with the functions transferred. (4) References Any reference in any other Federal law, Executive order, rule, regulation, or delegation of authority, or any document of or pertaining to a function of the Center for Verification and Evaluation that is transferred under this section is deemed, after the transfer date, to refer to the Small Business Administration. (h) Report Not later than the end of the 1-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this section and every 6 months thereafter until the transfer date, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration and Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly issue a report to the Committees on Appropriations, Small Business, and Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committees on Appropriations, Small Business and Entrepreneurship, and Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate on the planning for the transfer of functions and property required under this section and the amendments made by this section on the transfer date. Such report shall include— (1) whether and how the verification database and operations of the Center for Verification and Evaluation of the Department of Veterans Affairs will be incorporated into the existing certification database of the Small Business Administration; (2) projections for the numbers and timing, in terms of fiscal year, of— (A) already verified concerns that will come up for recertification; and (B) self-certified concerns that are expected to apply for certification; (3) an explanation of how outreach to veteran service organizations, the service-disabled veteran-owned and veteran-owned small business community, and other stakeholders will be conducted; and (4) other pertinent information determined by the Administrator and the Secretary. 832. Equitable adjustments to certain construction contracts (a) In general The Small Business Act ( 15 U.S.C. 631 15A. Equitable adjustments to construction contracts (a) Request for an equitable adjustment A small business concern performing a construction contract that was awarded by an agency may submit a request for an equitable adjustment to the contracting officer of such agency if the contracting officer directs a change in the work within the general scope of the contract without the agreement of the small business concern. Such request shall— (1) be timely made pursuant to the terms of the contract; and (2) comply with Federal regulations regarding equitable adjustments, including specifying additional costs resulting from such change in the work within the general scope of the contract. (b) Amount Upon receipt of a request for equitable adjustment under subsection (a), the agency shall provide to the small business concern an interim partial payment in an amount that is at least 50 percent of the costs identified in the request for equitable adjustment under subsection (a)(2). (c) Limitation Any interim partial payment made under this section shall not be deemed to be an action to definitize the request for an equitable adjustment. (d) Flow-down of interim partial payment amounts A small business concern that requests an equitable adjustment under this section shall pay to a first tier subcontractor or supplier the portion of the interim partial payment received that is attributable to the increased costs of performance incurred by the first tier subcontractor or supplier due to the change in the work within the general scope of the contract. A subcontractor or supplier at any tier that receives a portion of an interim partial payment under this section shall pay its subcontractor or supplier the appropriate portion of such payment. . (b) Implementation The Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall implement the requirements of this section not later than the first day of the first full fiscal year beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act. 833. Exemption of certain contracts awarded to small business concerns from category management requirements (a) In general The Small Business Act is amended— (1) by redesignating section 49 as section 50; and (2) by inserting after section 48 the following new section: 49. Exemption of certain contracts from category management requirements (a) In general A contract awarded under section 8(a), 8(m), 31, or 32 that is classified as tier 0— (1) shall be exempt from the procedural requirements of any Federal rule or guidance on category management or successor strategies for contract consolidation; and (2) may not be included when measuring the attainment of any goal or benchmark established under any Federal rule or guidance on category management or successor strategies for contract consolidation, unless the inclusion of such contract aids in the achievement of such a goal or benchmark. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) Category management The term category management (2) Tier 0 The term tier 0 . (b) Application Section 49 of the Small Business Act, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to contracts entered into on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. (c) Plan and report (1) In general Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall submit to Congress a report including a plan to increase the participation of small business concerns in agency-wide or Government-wide contracts (including best in class designations as defined in section 15(h)(4)(B)). Such plan shall include— (A) strategies to increase the amount and frequency of opportunities for small business concerns to participate in agency-wide or Government-wide contracts; (B) strategies to ease or eliminate requirements that impede such participation of small business concerns; and (C) a specific goal for the number of small business concerns participating in agency-wide or Government-wide contracts and a timeline to achieve such goal. (2) Implementation Not later than 60 days after the submission of the report required under paragraph (1), the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall implement the plan contained in such report. (d) Rulemaking Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulation shall be revised to carry out this Act and the amendment made by this Act. 834. Report on accelerated payments to certain small business concerns (a) Report Not later than 3 months after the date of the enactment of this section, the head of each Federal agency shall submit to Congress a report on the timeliness of payments made to a covered prime contractor. Such report shall include— (1) the date on which the Federal agency began providing accelerated payments in accordance with section 2307(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, or paragraphs (10) and (11) of section 3903(a) of title 31, United States Code, as applicable, to a covered prime contractor; (2) of contracts to which such sections apply, the amount and percentage of covered contracts with accelerated payment terms in accordance with such sections; and (3) whether and on what date the agency discontinued implementation of the Office of Management and Budget Circular M–11–32 titled Accelerating Payments to Small Businesses for Goods and Services (b) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered prime contractor The term covered prime contractor (A) a prime contractor (as defined in section 8701 of title 41) that is a small business concern (as defined in section 3 of the Small Business Act ( 15 U.S.C. 632 (B) a prime contractor that subcontracts with a small business concern. (2) Covered contract The term covered contract (A) on or after August 13, 2018, with respect to a contract entered into the head of an agency (as defined in section 2302 of title 10, United States Code); or (B) on or after December 20, 2019, with respect to a contract entered into with the head of an agency (as defined in section 3901 of title 31, United States Code). (3) Federal agency The term Federal agency agency E Other Matters 841. Modifications to supervision and award of certain contracts (a) Supervision of military construction projects Section 2851 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (c)(1)— (A) by inserting or appropriated funds authorized (B) in subparagraph (E), by inserting , Facilities Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization (FSRM) project, military construction project (2) in subsection (c)(2)— (A) by inserting , deadline for bid submissions, solicitation date (B) by inserting (including the address of such recipient) contract recipient (C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs: (H) Any subcontracting plan required under paragraph (4) or (5) of section 8(d) of the Small Business Act ( 15 U.S.C. 637(d) (I) A detailed written statement describing and justifying any exception applied or waiver granted under— (i) chapter 83 (ii) section 2533a of this title; or (iii) section 2533b of this title. ; and (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) The information required to be published on the Internet website under subsection (c) shall constitute a record for the purposes of Chapter 21, 29, 31, and 33 of title 44. . (b) Requirements relating to the award of covered military construction contracts (1) Requirements Subchapter III of chapter 169 section 2851 2851a. Requirements relating to the award of covered military construction contracts (a) Publication of certain information relating to covered military construction contracts (1) Contractor requirements A contractor that has been awarded a covered military construction contract shall— (A) make publicly available on a website of the General Services Administration or the Small Business Administration, as applicable, any solicitation under that covered military construction contract for a subcontract of an estimated value of $250,000 or more; and (B) submit written notification of the award of the covered military construction contract, and of any subcontract awarded under the covered military construction contract, to the relevant agency of a covered State that enforces workers’ compensation or minimum wage laws in such covered State. (2) Notice Upon award of a covered military construction contract with an estimated value greater than or equal to $2,000,000, the Secretary concerned shall notify any applicable Member of Congress representing the covered State in which that covered military construction contract is to be performed of such award in a timely manner. (3) Federal Procurement Data System The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that there is a clear and unique indication of any covered military construction contract with subcontracting work of an estimated value of $250,000 or more in the Federal Procurement Data System established pursuant to section 1122(a)(4) of title 41 (or any successor system). (b) Use of local firms and individuals (1) In general To the extent practicable, in awarding a covered military construction contract, the Secretary concerned shall give preference to those firms and individuals residing or doing business primarily in the same State as, or within a 60-mile radius of, the location of the work to be performed pursuant to the contract. (2) Justification required The Secretary concerned shall prepare a written justification, and make such justification available on the Internet site required under section 2851 of this title, for the award of any covered military construction contract to a firm or individual that is not described under paragraph (1). (c) Licensing A contractor and any subcontractors performing a covered military construction contract shall be licensed to perform the work under such contract in the State in which the work will be performed. (d) Monthly report Not later than 10 days after the end of each month, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report identifying for that month the following: (1) Each covered military construction contract and each subcontract of a covered military construction contract described in subsection (a)(1)(A) awarded during that month. (2) The location of the work to be performed pursuant to each covered military construction contract and subcontract identified pursuant to paragraph (1). (3) The prime contractor and any subcontractor performing each covered military construction contract and subcontract identified pursuant to paragraph (1). (4) The estimated value of each covered military construction contract and subcontract identified pursuant to paragraph (1). (e) Exclusion of classified projects This section does not apply to a classified covered military construction project. (f) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered military construction contract The term covered military construction contract (2) Covered State The term covered State (3) Member of Congress The term Member of Congress . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter III of chapter 169 section 2851 2851a. Requirements relating to the award of covered military construction contracts. . (3) Applicability Section 2851a of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), shall apply with respect to a covered military construction contract, as defined in such section, entered into on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. (c) Small business credit for local businesses Section 15 of the Small Business Act ( 15 U.S.C. 644 (y) Small business credit for local businesses (1) Credit for meeting subcontracting goals If a prime contractor awards a subcontract (at any tier) to a small business concern that has its principal office located in the same State as, or within a 60-mile radius of, the location of the work to be performed pursuant to the contract of the prime contractor, the value of the subcontract shall be doubled for purposes of determining compliance with the goals for procurement contracts under subsection (g)(1)(A) during such period. (2) Report Along with the report required under subsection (h)(1), the head of each Federal agency shall submit to the Administrator, and make publicly available on the scorecard described in section 868(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( Public Law 114–92 15 U.S.C. 644 . 842. Amendments to submissions to Congress relating to certain foreign military sales Section 887(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 22 U.S.C. 2761 (1) by striking the Secretary shall the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall (2) in paragraph (1)— (A) by striking December 31, 2021 December 31, 2024 (B) by striking with a value subsection (a) (3) in paragraph (2), by striking December 31, 2021 December 31, 2024 843. Revisions to requirement to use firm fixed-price contracts for foreign military sales (a) In general Section 830 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( 22 U.S.C. 2762 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting and subject to subsection (e) enactment of this Act (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (e) Applicability The regulations prescribed pursuant to subsection (a) shall not apply to a foreign military sale for which the foreign country that is the counterparty to such foreign military sale has requested a modification to the defense service or defense article that is the subject of such foreign military sale that would require significant development work. ; and (3) in subsection (c), by adding at the end the following new sentence: The Secretary may not delegate the authority to exercise such a waiver below the level of the service acquisition executive (as defined in section 101(a)(10) of title 10, United States Code). (b) Implementation The Secretary of Defense shall— (1) not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, issue guidance to carry out the amendments made by this section; and (2) not later than February 1, 2021, revise the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to carry out the amendments made by this section. 844. Small Business Industrial Base Resiliency Program (a) Establishment The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Base Policy (established under section 902 of this Act) shall establish a program to be known as the Small Business Industrial Base Resiliency Program (b) Uses of transactions A transaction entered into pursuant to the authority under this section shall— (1) support the monitoring and assessment of small business concerns that enter into such a transaction; (2) address critical issues in the industrial base relating to urgent operational needs in response to the COVID–19 pandemic; (3) support efforts to create, maintain, protect, expand, or restore the industrial base in response to the COVID–19 pandemic; and (4) as applicable, address supply chain vulnerabilities related to the COVID–19 pandemic for small business concerns that enter into such a transaction. (c) Duration The term of a transaction entered into pursuant to the authority under this section shall be two years. (d) Liabilities With respect to any transaction entered into pursuant to the authority under this section on or after the date of enactment of this Act, if such transaction imposes any contingent liability upon the United States, such liability shall be recorded as an obligation against amounts made available from the Research and Development, Defense-Wide, Pandemic Preparedness and Resilience National Security Fund under section 1003 in an amount equal to the maximum amount of the contingency at the time such transaction is entered into. (e) Report Not later than March 1, 2021, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Base Policy shall submit to the appropriate committees a report that includes the following: (1) A description of any guidance or policy issued to carry out this section. (2) A description of any relevant assessments prepared to address critical issues in the industrial base relating to urgent operational needs related to the COVID–19 pandemic. (3) A description of any transaction entered into pursuant to the authority under this section, and the impact such transaction has had on the response of the Department of Defense to the COVID–19 pandemic. (4) A prioritized list of gaps or vulnerabilities in the transactions of the industrial base in which small business concerns participate that are related the COVID–19 pandemic, including— (A) a description of mitigation strategies necessary to address such gaps or vulnerabilities; (B) the identification of the Secretary concerned or the head of the Defense Agency responsible for addressing such gaps or vulnerabilities; and (C) a proposed timeline for action to address such gaps or vulnerabilities. (5) Identification of each transaction designed to sustain specific essential technological and industrial capabilities and processes of the industrial base in which small business concerns participate that are related to the COVID–19 pandemic. (6) Any other steps necessary to foster and safeguard the industrial base in which small business concerns participate due to the impact of the COVID–19 pandemic. (f) Funding The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Base Policy shall use amounts authorized to be appropriated for Research and Development, Defense-Wide, Pandemic Preparedness and Resilience National Security Fund under section 1003 to carry out the requirements of this section. (g) Definitions In this Act: (1) Appropriate committees The term covered committees (A) the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives; and (B) the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate and the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives. (2) COVID–19 pandemic The term COVID–19 pandemic 50 U.S.C. 1601 (3) Defense Agency The term Defense Agency (4) Secretary concerned The term Secretary concerned (5) Small business concern The term small business concern 15 U.S.C. 632 845. Requirements relating to reports and limitations on the availability of funds (a) Limitation on the availability of funds relating to the Defense Civilian Training Corps program (1) Initial plan and schedule Beginning on October 1, 2020, if the Secretary of Defense has not submitted the plan and schedule to implement the Defense Civilian Training Corps program required under section 860(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 10 U.S.C. 2200g (2) Expansion plan and schedule Beginning on January 1, 2021, if the Secretary of Defense has not submitted the expansion plan and schedule relating to the Defense Civilian Training Corps program required under section 860(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 10 U.S.C. 2200g (3) Funds specified The funds specified in this paragraph are the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for the Department of Defense for the following: (A) The immediate office of the Secretary of Defense. (B) The Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness. (C) The Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. (D) The Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. (b) Report and limitation on the availability of funds relating to the extramural acquisition innovation and research activities (1) Report Not later than October 1, 2020, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report— (A) on the establishment of the extramural acquisition innovation and research activities required under section 2361a of title 10, United States Code (as added by section 835(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (B) that includes the name of the Director appointed under section 2361a(c) of such title (as added by section 835(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (2) Limitation (A) In general Beginning on October 1, 2020, if the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment has not submitted the report required under paragraph (1), not more than 25 percent of the funds specified in subparagraph (B) may be obligated or expended until the date on which such report has been submitted. (B) Funds specified The funds specified in this subparagraph are the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for the Department of Defense for the following: (i) The immediate office of the Secretary of Defense. (ii) The Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. (iii) The Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. (c) Report and limitation on the availability of funds relating to the eliminating the gaps and vulnerabilities in the national technology and industrial base (1) Report Not later than October 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the national security strategy for national technology and industrial base required by section 2501(a) of title 10, United States Code. (2) Limitation (A) In general Beginning on October 1, 2020, if the Secretary of Defense has not submitted the report required under paragraph (1), not more than 25 percent of the funds specified in subparagraph (B) may be obligated or expended until the date on which such report has been submitted. (B) Funds specified The funds specified in this subparagraph are the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for the Department of Defense for the following: (i) The immediate office of the Secretary of Defense. (ii) The Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. 846. Assessment of the requirements processes of the military departments (a) Assessment The Secretary of the military department concerned shall assess the requirements process of the military department and make recommendations to improve the agility and timeliness of such requirements process for acquisition programs of the military department. (b) Report (1) In general Not later than March 31, 2021, each Secretary of a military department shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the assessment conducted pursuant to subsection (a) and specific plans to update the requirements processes of the military department concerned based on such assessment. (2) Elements Each report shall include an analysis of and recommended improvements for the following elements: (A) If appropriate, information from the report required in section 800(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (B) The alignment of the requirements processes, acquisition system, and budget process of the military department concerned. (C) The requirements process for each acquisition pathway of the adaptive acquisition framework (as described in Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02, Operation of the Adaptive Acquisition Framework (D) For each acquisition pathway described in subparagraph (C), the processes for and the extent to which detailed systems engineering and requirements trade-off analyses are done before the development of requirements begins for a specific acquisition program to ensure that risks are understood and accounted for and that both top-level and derived requirements (development as well as reliability and maintainability) are achievable within cost, schedule, and technology constraints. (E) Organizational roles and responsibilities of individuals with responsibilities relating to the requirements process for the military department concerned, including the role, composition, and metrics used to assess the effectiveness of any requirements oversight council of the military department concerned. (F) The composition and sufficiency of individuals who develop requirements for the military department concerned, including any acquisition workforce planning and personnel shortfalls and resources needed to address any such shortfalls. (G) The ability of the requirements process to address the urgent needs of the military department concerned. (H) The capacity to review changes in requirements for programs of record. (I) The validation of decisions made from the requirements process and the alignment of each such decision to the national defense strategy required under section 113(g) of title 10, United States Code. (J) The use of portfolio management in the requirements process to coordinate decisions and avoid any duplication of requirements across acquisition programs. (K) The implementation of recommendations on the process from the Comptroller General of the United States by each military department. (L) Identification and comparison of best practices in the private sector and the public sector for the requirements development and approval process. (M) Other recommendations to improve the process of establishing requirements, including lessons learned from responding to the COVID–19 pandemic. (N) Any additional matters that the Secretaries determine appropriate. 847. Report on transfer and consolidation of certain defense acquisition statutes Not later than February 21, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing a comprehensive legislative proposal for the transfer and consolidation of statutes within the framework for part V of subtitle A of title 10, United States Code (as enacted by section 801 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 IX Department of Defense Organization and Management A Office of the Secretary of Defense and Related Matters 901. Repeal of position of Chief Management Officer (a) Repeal of position of Chief Management Officer (1) In general Section 132a of title 10, United States Code is repealed. (2) Conforming amendments and repeals (A) Paragraph (2) of section 131(b) of title 10, United States Code, is repealed. (B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 4 (C) Section 910 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 (3) Effective date The amendments and repeals made by paragraphs (1) and (2) shall take effect 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (b) Implementation On the effective date of the amendments and repeals under subsection (a)— (1) any duties and responsibilities that remain assigned to the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense shall be transferred to a single official selected by the Secretary of Defense, except that such official may not be an individual who served as the Chief Management Officer before such effective date; (2) the personnel, functions, and assets of the Office of the Chief Management Officer shall be transferred to such other organizations and elements of the Department as the Secretary determines appropriate; and (3) any reference in Federal law, regulations, guidance, instructions, or other documents of the Federal Government to the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense shall be deemed to be a reference to the official selected by the Secretary under paragraph (1)). (c) Legislative proposal Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes a comprehensive legislative proposal for additional conforming amendments to law required by the amendments and repeals made by this section. 902. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Base Policy (a) In general (1) Assistant Secretaries of Defense Section 138 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) in subsection (a)(1), by striking 13 14 (B) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (6) One of the Assistant Secretaries is the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Base Policy. In addition to any duties and powers prescribed under paragraph (1), the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Base Policy shall have the duties described in section 139c of this title. . (2) Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Base Policy Chapter 4 of subtitle A of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 139b the following new section: 139c. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Base Policy (a) In general The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Base Policy shall report to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. (b) Responsibilities The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Base Policy shall be the head of the Office of Defense Industrial Base Policy and shall serve as the principal advisor to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment in the performance of the Under Secretary’s duties relating to the following: (1) Providing input to strategy reviews on matters related to— (A) the defense industrial base; and (B) materials critical to national security (as defined in section 187(e)(1) of this title). (2) Establishing policies of the Department of Defense for developing and maintaining the defense industrial base of the United States and ensuring a secure supply of materials critical to national security. (3) Providing recommendations on budget matters pertaining to the defense industrial base, the supply chain, and the development and retention of skills necessary to support the defense industrial base. (4) Providing recommendations and acquisition policy guidance on defense supply chain management and supply chain vulnerability throughout the entire defense supply chain, from suppliers of raw materials to producers of major end items. (5) Establishing the national security objectives concerning the national technology and industrial base required under section 2501 of this title. (6) Executing the national defense program for analysis of the national technology and industrial base required under section 2503 of this title. (7) Performing the national technology and industrial base periodic defense capability assessments required under section 2505 of this title. (8) Establishing the technology and industrial base policy guidance required under section 2506 of this title. (9) Providing policy and oversight of matters related to materials critical to national security to ensure a secure supply of such materials to the Department of Defense. (10) Carrying out the activities of the Department of Defense relating to the Defense Production Act Committee established under section 722 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 ( 50 U.S.C. App. 2171 (11) Consistent with section 2(b) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 ( 50 U.S.C. App. 2062(b) 50 U.S.C. App. 2061 (12) Establishing Department of Defense policies related to international defense technology security and export control issues. (13) Establishing policies related to industrial independent research and development programs under section 2372 of this title. (14) Coordinating with the Director of Small Business Programs on all matters related to industrial base policy of the Department of Defense. (15) Ensuring reliable sources of materials critical to national security, such as specialty metals, armor plate, and rare earth elements. (16) Establishing policies of the Department of Defense for continued reliable resource availability from secure sources for the defense industrial base of the United States. (17) Establishing policies related to a procurement technical assistance program funded under this chapter 142 of this title. (18) Such other duties as are assigned by the Under Secretary. (c) Rules of construction relating to Defense Production Act Nothing in this section shall be construed to modify the authorities or responsibilities of any officer or employee of the United States under the Defense Production Act of 1950 ( 50 U.S.C. 4501 50 U.S.C. 4565(k) . (3) Clerical amendment The table of contents for chapter 4 of subtitle A of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 139b the following new item: 139c. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Base Policy. . (b) Continuation of service The Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Policy shall be the individual serving as the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Base Policy (as established under section 139c(a) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)) until the President has appointed an individual to serve as Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Base Policy pursuant to section 138 of title 10, United States Code. (c) Transfer of Office of Industrial Policy to Office of Defense Industrial Base Policy (1) Transfer of functions Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, all functions that, immediately before such date of enactment, were functions of the Office of Industrial Policy of the Department of Defense shall be transferred to the Office of Defense Industrial Base Policy. (2) Transfer of assets So much of the personnel, property, records, and unexpended balances of appropriations, allocations, and other funds employed, used, held, available, or to be made available in connection with a function transferred under paragraph (1) shall be available to the Office of Defense Industrial Base Policy at such time or times as the President directs for use in connection with the functions transferred. (3) Termination The Office of Industrial Policy of the Department of Defense shall terminate on the earlier of— (A) the effective date of the transfers under paragraph (1); or (B) 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. B Other Department of Defense Organization and Management Matters 911. Limitation on reduction of civilian workforce Section 129a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: The Secretary may not reduce the civilian workforce programmed full-time equivalent levels unless the Secretary conducts an appropriate analysis of the impacts of such reductions on workload, military force structure, lethality, readiness, operational effectiveness, stress on the military force, and fully burdened costs. 912. Chief Diversity Officers (a) Department of Defense (1) In general Chapter 4 146. Chief Diversity Officer (a) Chief Diversity Officer (1) There is a Chief Diversity Officer of the Department of Defense, appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. (2) The Chief Diversity Officer shall be appointed from among persons who have an extensive management or business background and experience with diversity and inclusion. A person may not be appointed as Chief Diversity Officer within seven years after relief from active duty as a commissioned officer of a regular component of an armed force. (b) Powers and duties The Chief Diversity Officer— (1) is responsible for policy, oversight, guidance, and coordination for all matters of the Department of Defenserelated to diversity and inclusion; (2) exercises authority to direct the Secretaries of the military departments and the heads of all other elements of the Department with regard to matters for which the Chief Diversity Officer has responsibility under this section; (3) exercises authority, direction, and control over the Office of People Analytics, or any successor organization; (4) shall establish and maintain a Department of Defense strategic plan that publicly states a diversity definition, vision, and goals for the Department of Defense; (5) shall define a set of strategic metrics that are directly linked to key organizational priorities and goals, actionable, and actively used to implement the strategic plan; (6) shall establish training in diversity dynamics and training in practices for leading diverse groups effectively; (7) shall establish and maintain a strategic plan for outreach to, and recruiting from, untapped locations and underrepresented demographic groups; (8) shall conduct regular, rigorous evaluations and assessments of diversity within the Department of Defense; and (9) shall perform such additional duties and exercise such powers as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe. (c) Precedence in the Department of Defense (1) The Chief Diversity Officer shall report directly to the Secretary of Defense in the performance of duties under this section. (2) The Chief Diversity Officer takes precedence in the Department of Defense after the Chief Management Officer. . (2) Technical and conforming amendments (A) The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 146. Chief Diversity Officer. . (B) Section 136(b) of such title is amended by inserting the Chief Diversity Officer and control of the Secretary of Defense, (b) Department of the Army (1) In general Chapter 703 7025. Chief Diversity Officer (a) Chief diversity officer (1) There is a Chief Diversity Officer of the Department of the Army, appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. (2) The Chief Diversity Officer shall be appointed from among persons who have an extensive management or business background and experience with diversity and inclusion. (b) Powers and duties The Chief Diversity Officer— (1) is responsible for policy, oversight, guidance, and coordination for all matters of the Department of the Army related to diversity and inclusion; (2) exercises authority to direct the heads of all other elements of the Department with regard to matters for which the Chief Diversity Officer has responsibility under this section; (3) shall establish training in diversity dynamics and training in practices for leading diverse groups effectively; (4) shall conduct regular, rigorous evaluations and assessments of diversity within the Department of the Army; and (5) shall perform such additional duties and exercise such powers as the Secretary of the Army may prescribe. . (2) Technical and conforming amendments (A) The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 7025. Chief Diversity Officer. . (B) Section 7014(b) of such title is amended by— (i) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (8) as paragraphs (3) through (9), respectively; and (ii) by inserting after paragraph (1), the following new paragraph (2): (2) The Chief Diversity Officer. . (C) Section 7014(c)(1) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph (H): (H) Diversity and inclusion. . (c) Department of the Navy (1) In general Chapter 803 8029. Chief Diversity Officer (a) Chief diversity officer (1) There is a Chief Diversity Officer of the Department of the Navy, appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. (2) The Chief Diversity Officer shall be appointed from among persons who have an extensive management or business background and experience with diversity and inclusion. (b) Powers and duties The Chief Diversity Officer— (1) is responsible for policy, oversight, guidance, and coordination for all matters of the Department of the Navy related to diversity and inclusion; (2) exercises authority to direct the heads of all other elements of the Department with regard to matters for which the Chief Diversity Officer has responsibility under this section; (3) shall establish training in diversity dynamics and training in practices for leading diverse groups effectively; (4) shall conduct regular, rigorous evaluations and assessments of diversity within the Department of the Navy; and (5) shall perform such additional duties and exercise such powers as the Secretary of the Navy may prescribe. . (2) Technical and conforming amendments (A) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 803 8029. Chief Diversity Officer. . (B) Section 8014(b) of such title is amended by— (i) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (8) as paragraphs (3) through (9), respectively; and (ii) by inserting after paragraph (1), the following new paragraph (2): (2) The Chief Diversity Officer. . (C) Section 8014(c)(1) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph (H): (H) Diversity and inclusion. . (d) Department of the Air Force (1) In general Chapter 903 9025. Chief Diversity Officer (a) Chief diversity officer (1) There is a Chief Diversity Officer of the Department of the Air Force, appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. (2) The Chief Diversity Officer shall be appointed from among persons who have an extensive management or business background and experience with diversity and inclusion. (b) Powers and duties The Chief Diversity Officer— (1) is responsible for policy, oversight, guidance, and coordination for all matters of the Department of the Air Forcerelated to diversity and inclusion; (2) exercises authority to direct the heads of all other elements of the Department with regard to matters for which the Chief Diversity Officer has responsibility under this section; (3) shall establish training in diversity dynamics and training in practices for leading diverse groups effectively; (4) shall conduct regular, rigorous evaluations and assessments of diversity within the Department of the Air Force; and (5) shall perform such additional duties and exercise such powers as the Secretary of the Air Force may prescribe. . (2) Technical and conforming amendments (A) The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 9025. Chief Diversity Officer. . (B) Section 9014(b) of such title is amended by— (i) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (8) as paragraphs (3) through (9), respectively; and (ii) by inserting after paragraph (1), the following new paragraph (2): (2) The Chief Diversity Officer. . (C) Section 9014(c)(1) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph (H): (H) Diversity and inclusion. . (e) Coast Guard (1) In general Chapter 3 321. Chief Diversity Officer (a) Establishment (1) There is a Chief Diversity Officer of the Coast Guard, appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. (2) The Chief Diversity Officer shall be appointed from among persons who have an extensive management or business background and experience with diversity and inclusion. (b) Powers and duties The Chief Diversity Officer— (1) is responsible for policy, oversight, guidance, and coordination for all matters of the Coast Guard related to diversity and inclusion; (2) exercises authority to direct the heads of all other elements of the Coast Guard with regard to matters for which the Chief Diversity Officer has responsibility under this section; (3) shall establish training in diversity dynamics and training in practices for leading diverse groups effectively; (4) shall conduct regular, rigorous evaluations and assessments of diversity within the Coast Guard; and (5) shall perform such additional duties and exercise such powers as the Commandant may prescribe. (c) Precedence The Chief Diversity Officer shall report directly to the Commandant in the performance of duties under this section. . (2) Technical and conforming amendments The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 321. Chief Diversity Officer. . (f) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect on February 1, 2021. 913. Establishment of Deputy Assistant Secretaries for Sustainment (a) Department of the Army (1) In general Chapter 703 7026. Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Sustainment (a) Appointment There is a Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Sustainment, who shall be appointed by the Secretary of the Army. (b) Responsibilities The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Sustainment shall have the following responsibilities with respect to major weapon systems acquired for the Department of the Army: (1) Reviewing and providing oversight of the sustainment baseline cost estimates required by section 2366d of this title. (2) Participating in any review of a life-cycle sustainment plan conducted pursuant to section 2366d of this title. (3) Ensuring that cost modeling, performance metrics, and data analytics are used— (A) to inform and update life-cycle sustainment plans; (B) to develop, with respect to the major weapon system to which such plan relates, the budget of the President for the fiscal year as submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31; and (C) to inform the Secretary of the Army when assumptions made in the development of a sustainment baseline cost estimate are no longer valid or when new opportunities arise to reduce costs or improve efficiency. (4) Making recommendations to the senior acquisition executive of the Army regarding the most cost-effective sustainment strategy to incorporate into each life-cycle sustainment plan. (5) Balancing the range of sustainment activities for each major weapon system to achieve the optimal balance of affordability, viable military depots and shipyards, and contracted product support arrangements. (6) Advise the Secretary of the Army regarding the overall alignment of the sustainment activities, the operations of the sustainment supply chain, and strategic readiness. (c) Definitions The terms life-cycle sustainment plan major weapon system sustainment baseline cost estimate . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 703 7026. Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Sustainment. . (b) Department of the Navy (1) In general Chapter 803 8029a. Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Sustainment (a) Appointment There is a Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Sustainment, who shall be appointed by the Secretary of the Navy. (b) Responsibilities The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Sustainment shall have the following responsibilities with respect to major weapon systems acquired for the Department of the Navy: (1) Reviewing and providing oversight of the sustainment baseline cost estimates required by section 2366d of this title. (2) Participating in any review of a life-cycle sustainment plan conducted pursuant to section 2366d of this title. (3) Ensuring that cost modeling, performance metrics, and data analytics are used— (A) to inform and update life-cycle sustainment plans; (B) to develop, with respect to the major weapon system to which such plan relates, the budget of the President for the fiscal year as submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31; and (C) to inform the Secretary of the Navy when assumptions made in the development of a sustainment baseline cost estimate are no longer valid or when new opportunities arise to reduce costs or improve efficiency. (4) Making recommendations to the senior acquisition executive of the Navy regarding the most cost-effective sustainment strategy to incorporate into each life-cycle sustainment plan. (5) Balancing the range of sustainment activities for each major weapon system to achieve the optimal balance of affordability, viable military depots and shipyards, and contracted product support arrangements. (6) Advise the Secretary of the Navy regarding the overall alignment of the sustainment activities, the operations of the sustainment supply chain, and strategic readiness. (c) Definitions The terms life-cycle sustainment plan major weapon system sustainment baseline cost estimate . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 803 8029a. Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Sustainment. . (c) Department of the Air Force (1) In general Chapter 903 9026. Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Sustainment (a) Appointment There is a Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Sustainment, who shall be appointed by the Secretary of the Air Force. (b) Responsibilities The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Sustainment shall have the following responsibilities with respect to major weapon systems acquired for the Department of the Air Force: (1) Reviewing and providing oversight of the sustainment baseline cost estimates required by section 2366d of this title. (2) Participating in any review of a life-cycle sustainment plan conducted pursuant to section 2366d of this title. (3) Ensuring that cost modeling, performance metrics, and data analytics are used— (A) to inform and update life-cycle sustainment plans; (B) to develop, with respect to the major weapon system to which such plan relates, the budget of the President for the fiscal year as submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31; and (C) to inform the Secretary of the Air Force when assumptions made in the development of a sustainment baseline cost estimate are no longer valid or when new opportunities arise to reduce costs or improve efficiency. (4) Making recommendations to the senior acquisition executive of the Air Force regarding the most cost-effective sustainment strategy to incorporate into each life-cycle sustainment plan. (5) Balancing the range of sustainment activities for each major weapon system to achieve the optimal balance of affordability, viable military depots and shipyards, and contracted product support arrangements. (6) Advise the Secretary of the Air Force regarding the overall alignment of the sustainment activities, the operations of the sustainment supply chain, and strategic readiness. (c) Definitions The terms life-cycle sustainment plan major weapon system sustainment baseline cost estimate . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 903 9026. Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Sustainment. . 914. Office of Defense Community Cooperation and Economic Adjustment (a) Establishment (1) In general Chapter 141 section 2391 2391a. Office of Defense Community Cooperation and Economic Adjustment (a) Establishment There is in the Office of the Secretary of Defense an Office of Defense Community Cooperation and Economic Adjustment (in this section referred to as the Office (b) Head of Office There is a Director of the Office who shall be the head of the Office. The Director shall be appointed by the Secretary of Defense. (c) Duties The Office shall— (1) serve as the office in the Department of Defense with primary responsibility for— (A) providing assistance to States, counties, municipalities, regions, and other communities to foster cooperation with military installations to enhance the military mission, achieve facility and infrastructure savings and reduced operating costs, address encroachment and compatible land use issues, support military families, and increase military, civilian, and industrial readiness and resiliency; and (B) providing adjustment and diversification assistance to State and local governments under section 2391(b) to achieve the objectives described in subparagraph (A); (2) coordinate the provision of such assistance with other organizations and elements of the Department; (3) provide support to the Economic Adjustment Committee established under Executive Order 12788 (57 Fed. Reg. 2213; 10 U.S.C. 2391 (4) carry out such other activities as the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2391 the following new item: 2391a. Office of Defense Community Cooperation and Economic Adjustment. . (b) Transfers Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall transfer the functions, personnel, and assets of the Office of Economic Adjustment of the Department of Defense to the Office of Defense Community Cooperation and Economic Adjustment established under section 2391a of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)). (c) Administration of certain programs Beginning on the effective date of the transfers under subsection (b), any program, project, or other activity administered by the Office of Economic Adjustment of the Department of Defense as of the date of the enactment of this Act shall be administered by the Office of Defense Community Cooperation and Economic Adjustment established under section 2391a of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)). 915. Input from Chief of National Guard Bureau to the Joint Requirements Oversight Council Section 181(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) Input from Chief of National Guard Bureau The Council shall seek, and strongly consider, the views of the Chief of National Guard Bureau regarding non-Federalized National Guard capabilities in support of homeland defense and civil support missions. . 916. Redesignation of the Joint Forces Staff College (a) In general Title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking Joint Forces Staff College Joint Forces War College (b) References Any reference in Federal law, regulations, guidance, instructions, or other documents of the Federal Government to the Joint Forces Staff College shall be deemed to be a reference to the Joint Forces War College. C Space Matters 921. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space and Strategic Deterrence Policy (a) Assistant Secretaries of Defense Paragraph (5) of section 138(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (5) One of the Assistant Secretaries is the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space and Strategic Deterrence Policy. The principal duty of the Assistant Secretary shall be the overall supervision of policy of the Department of Defense for space, nuclear deterrence, and missile defense. . (b) Space Force Acquisition Council Section 9021(b)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space Policy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space and Strategic Deterrence Policy (c) Elements of office Section 955(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space Policy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space and Strategic Deterrence Policy 922. Office of the Chief of Space Operations (a) In general Chapter 908 9083. Office of the Chief of Space Operations: function; composition (a) Function There is in the executive part of the Department of the Air Force an Office of the Chief of Space Operations to assist the Secretary of the Air Force in carrying out the responsibilities of the Secretary. (b) Composition The Office of the Chief of Space Operations is composed of the following: (1) The Chief of Space Operations. (2) Other members of the Space Force and Air Force assigned or detailed to the Office of the Chief of Space Operations. (3) Civilian employees in the Department of the Air Force assigned or detailed to the Office of the Chief of Space Operations. (c) Organization Except as otherwise specifically prescribed by law, the Office of the Chief of Space Operations shall be organized in such manner, and the members of the Office of the Chief of Space Operations shall perform such duties and have such titles, as the Secretary of the Air Force may prescribe. 9084. Office of the Chief of Space Operations: general duties (a) Professional assistance The Office of the Chief of Space Operations shall furnish professional assistance to the Secretary, the Under Secretary, and the Assistant Secretaries of the Air Force and to the Chief of Space Operations. (b) Authorities Under the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of the Air Force, the Office of the Chief of Space Operations shall— (1) subject to subsections (c) and (d) of section 9014 of this title, prepare for such employment of the Space Force, and for such recruiting, organizing, supplying, equipping (including research and development), training, servicing, mobilizing, demobilizing, administering, and maintaining of the Space Force, as will assist in the execution of any power, duty, or function of the Secretary of the Air Force or the Chief of Space Operations; (2) investigate and report upon the efficiency of the Space Force and its preparation to support military operations by commanders of the combatant commands; (3) prepare detailed instructions for the execution of approved plans and supervise the execution of those plans and instructions; (4) as directed by the Secretary of the Air Force or the Chief of Space Operations, coordinate the action of organizations of the Space Force; and (5) perform such other duties, not otherwise assigned by law, as may be prescribed by the Secretary of the Air Force. . (b) Table of sections amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 908 of such title is amended by striking the item related to section 9083 and adding at the end the following new items: 9083. Office of the Chief of Space Operations: function; composition 9084. Office of the Chief of Space Operations: general duties . (c) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force and the Chief of Space Operations jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a report detailing the functions that the headquarters staff of the Department of the Air Force will continue to perform in support of the Space Force. (d) No authorization of additional military billets The Secretary shall establish the Office of the Chief of Space Operations under section 9083 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), using military personnel otherwise authorized. Nothing in this section or the amendments made by this section shall be construed to authorize additional military billets for the purposes of, or in connection with, the establishment of the Office of the Chief of Space Operations. 923. Space Force Medal (a) Space Force medal Chapter 937 section 9280 9280a. Space Force Medal: award; limitations (a) The President may award a decoration called the Space Force Medal (b) Not more than one Space Force Medal may be awarded to a person. However, for each succeeding act that would otherwise justify award of such a medal, the President may award a suitable bar or other device to be worn as the President directs. . (b) Table of sections amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 9280 the following new item: 9280a. Space Force Medal: award; limitations. . 924. Clarification of procurement of commercial satellite communications services (a) In general Chapter 963 9531. Procurement of commercial satellite communications services The Chief of Space Operations shall be responsible for the procurement of commercial satellite communications services for the Department of Defense. . (b) Table of sections amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 963 of such title is amended by inserting before the item relating to section 9532 the following new item: 9531. Procurement of commercial satellite communications services. . 925. Temporary exemption from authorized daily average of members in pay grades E–8 and E–9 Section 517 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply to the Space Force until October 1, 2023. 926. One-time uniform allowance for members transferred to the Space Force (a) In general The Secretary of the Air Force may provide an officer or enlisted member who transfers from the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps to the Space Force an allowance of not more than $400 as reimbursement for the purchase of required uniforms and equipment. (b) Relationship to other allowances The allowance under this section is in addition to any allowance available under any other provision of law. (c) Source of funds Funds for allowances provided under subsection (a) in a fiscal year may be derived only from amounts authorized to be appropriated for military personnel for such fiscal year. (d) Applicability The authority for an allowance under this section shall apply with respect to any member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps who transfers to the Space Force on or after December 20, 2019, and on or before September 30, 2023. X General Provisions A Financial Matters 1001. General transfer authority (a) Authority to transfer authorizations (1) Authority Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this division for fiscal year 2021 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred. (2) Limitation Except as provided in paragraph (3), the total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this section may not exceed $4,000,000,000. (3) Exception for transfers between military personnel authorizations A transfer of funds between military personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be counted toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2). (b) Limitations The authority provided by subsection (a) to transfer authorizations— (1) may only be used to provide authority for items that have a higher priority than the items from which authority is transferred; and (2) may not be used to provide authority for an item that has been denied authorization by Congress. (c) Effect on authorization amounts A transfer made from one account to another under the authority of this section shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount transferred. (d) Notice to congress The Secretary shall promptly notify Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a). (e) Certification requirement The authority to transfer any authorization under this section may not be used until the Secretary of Defense and the head of each entity affected by such transfer submits to the congressional defense committees certification in writing that— (1) the amount transferred will be used for higher priority items, based on unforeseen military requirements, than the items from which authority is transferred; and (2) the amount transferred will not be used for any item for which funds have been denied authorization by Congress. 1002. Determination of budgetary effects The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation 1003. Pandemic Preparedness and Resilience National Security Fund (a) Fund purposes Amounts authorized to be appropriated for Research and Development, Defense-Wide, Pandemic Preparedness and Resilience National Security Fund shall be available for obligation and expenditure only for the purposes of pandemic preparedness. Such amounts may not be used for a purpose or program unless the purpose or program is authorized by law. (b) Transfers (1) In general Amounts referred to in subsection (a) may be transferred as follows: (A) To Procurement, Defense-wide and Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Defense-wide, not more than an aggregate of $200,000,000 to carry out the Small Business Industrial Base Resilience Program established by section 844 of this Act. (B) To Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Defense-wide, line 9, Biomedical Technology, not more than $50,000,000 for research that aims to rapidly produce medical countermeasures against novel threats, at population scale and approved for use in people. (C) To the following, not more than an aggregate of $750,000,000 to support research and development efforts directly related to biopreparedness and pandemic preparedness and resilience: (i) Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Army. (ii) Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy. (iii) Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air Force. (iv) Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Defense-wide. (v) Defense Health Program. (D) To Research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, Line 16, Chemical and Biological Defense Program, not more than $27,000,000 for research and development to detect and model treatments for nuclear, chemical, and biological exposure. (E) To research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, line 44, Chemical and Biological Defense Program – Advanced Development, not more than $30,000,000 for the development of decontamination technologies for civilian pandemic preparedness. (F) To research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, line 49, Manufacturing Science and Technology Program, not more than $35,000,000 for support for the development of advanced manufacturing techniques and technologies that enable the United States defense industrial base to rapidly produce needed materials for novel biological threats. (2) Limitation Amounts referred to in subsection (a) may not be transferred for— (A) Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities; or (B) military construction (as defined in section 2801(a) of title 10, United States Code), including the purposes described in section 2802(b) of such title, or military family housing, including the purposes described in section 2821(a) of such title. (3) Notice requirement Not later than 30 days before transferring any amount described in subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees notice of the transfer. (4) Exception from general transfer authority A transfer under this subsection shall not be counted toward the dollar amount limitation under section 1001. 1004. Budget materials for special operations forces Section 226 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) by inserting of Defense and the Secretary of each of the military departments Secretary (B) by striking 2021 2022 (C) by striking a consolidated budget justification display a budget justification display for each applicable appropriation (D) in the second sentence, by striking display displays shall include each of the following: (E) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (1) Details at the appropriation and line item level, including any amount for service-common support, acquisition support, training, operations, pay and allowances, base operations sustainment, and any other common services and support. (2) An identification of any change in the level or type of service-common support and enabling capabilities provided by each of the military services or Defense Agencies to special operations forces for the fiscal year covered by the budget justification display when compared to the preceding fiscal year, including the rationale for any such change and any mitigating actions. (3) An assessment of the specific effects that the budget justification display for the fiscal year covered by the display and any anticipated future manpower and force structure changes are likely to have on the ability of each of the military services to provide service-common support and enabling capabilities to special operations forces. (4) Any other matters the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department determines are relevant. ; (2) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): (b) Consolidated budget justification display The Secretary of Defense shall include, in the budget materials submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, for fiscal year 2022 and any subsequent fiscal year, a consolidated budget justification display containing the same information as is required in the budget justification displays required under subsection (a). Such consolidated budget justification display may be provided as a summary by appropriation for each military department and a summary by appropriation for all Defense Agencies. . B Counterdrug Activities 1011. Support for counterdrug activities and activities to counter transnational organized crime affecting flow of drugs into the United States Section 284(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking paragraph (2), and inserting the following new paragraph (2): (2) Secretary of State concurrence The Secretary may only provide support for a purpose described in this subsection with the concurrence of the Secretary of State. ; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) Priority In providing support for a purpose described in this subsection, the Secretary shall give priority to support requested for the purpose of affecting the flow of drugs into the United States. . 1012. Congressional notification with respect to Department of Defense support provided to other United States agencies for counterdrug activities and activities to counter transnational organized crime Section 284(h) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as subparagraphs (B) and (C), respectively; and (B) by inserting before subparagraph (B), as so redesignated, the following new subparagraph (A): (A) In case of support for a purpose described in subsection (b)— (i) an identification of the recipient of the support; (ii) a description of the support provided; (iii) a description of the sources and amounts of funds used to provide such support; and (iv) a description of the amount of funds obligated to provide such support. ; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) Appropriate committees of Congress For purposes of any notice submitted under this subsection with respect to support described in paragraph (1)(A), the appropriate committees of Congress are— (A) the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives; and (B) any committee with jurisdiction over the department or agency that receives the support covered by the notice. . C Naval Vessels 1021. Limitation on availability of certain funds without naval vessels plan and certification Section 231(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) by striking Secretary of the Navy Secretary of Defense (B) by striking 50 percent 25 percent (2) in paragraph (2)— (A) by striking Secretary of the Navy Secretary of Defense (B) by striking operation and maintenance, Navy operation and maintenance, Defense-wide 1022. Limitations on use of funds in the National Defense Sealift Fund for purchase of foreign constructed vessels Section 2218(f)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking seven nine (2) in subparagraph (E), by striking two four 1023. Use of National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund for incrementally funded contracts to provide full funding for Columbia class submarines Section 2218a(h)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking and properly phased installment payments , properly phased installment payments, and full funding for the first two Columbia class submarines 1024. Preference for United States vessels in transporting supplies by sea (a) Preference for United States vessels in transporting supplies by sea (1) In general Section 2631 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 2631. Preference for United States vessels in transporting supplies by sea (a) In general Supplies bought for the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps, or for a Defense Agency, or otherwise transported by the Department of Defense, may only be transported by sea in— (1) a vessel belonging to the United States; or (2) a vessel of the United States (as such term is defined in section 116 of title 46). (b) Waiver and notification (1) The Secretary of Defense may waive the requirement under subsection (a) if such a vessel is— (A) not available at a fair and reasonable rate for commercial vessels of the United States; or (B) otherwise not available. (2) At least once each fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit, in writing, to the appropriate congressional committees a notice of any waiver granted under this subsection and the reasons for such waiver. (c) Requirements for reflagging or repair work (1) In each request for proposals to enter into a time-charter contract for the use of a vessel for the transportation of supplies under this section, the Secretary of Defense shall require that— (A) any reflagging or repair work on a vessel for which a proposal is submitted in response to the request for proposals be performed in the United States (including any territory of the United States); and (B) any corrective and preventive maintenance or repair work on a vessel under contract pursuant to this section relevant to the purpose of such contract be performed in the United States (including any territory of the United States) for the duration of the contract, to the greatest extent practicable. (2) The Secretary of Defense may waive a requirement under paragraph (1) if the Secretary determines that such waiver is critical to the national security of the United States. The Secretary shall immediately submit, in writing, to the appropriate congressional committees a notice of any waiver granted under this paragraph and the reasons for such waiver. (3) In this subsection: (A) The term reflagging or repair work (i) to enable the vessel to meet applicable standards to become a vessel of the United States; or (ii) to convert the vessel to a more useful military configuration. (B) The term corrective and preventive maintenance or repair (i) maintenance or repair actions performed as a result of a failure in order to return or restore equipment to acceptable performance levels; and (ii) scheduled maintenance or repair actions to prevent or discover functional failures. (d) Compliance The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that contracting officers of the Department of Defense award contracts under this section to responsible offerors and monitor and ensure compliance with the requirements of this section. The Secretary shall— (1) ensure that timely, accurate, and complete information on contractor performance under this section is included in any contractor past performance database used by an executive agency; and (2) exercise appropriate contractual rights and remedies against contractors who fail to comply with this section, or subchapter I of chapter 553 (A) determining that a contractor is ineligible for an award of such a contract; or (B) terminating such a contract or suspension or debarment of the contractor for such contract. (e) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees (1) the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives; (2) the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives; and (3) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of contents for chapter 157 2361. Preference for United States vessels in transporting supplies by sea. . (b) Amendments to title 46, United States Code (1) Transfer of provision relating to priority loading for coal (A) In general Section 55301 of title 46, United States Code, is redesignated as section 55123 of such title, transferred to appear after section 55122 of such title, and amended so that the enumerator, section heading, typeface, and typestyle conform to those appearing in other sections in such title. (B) Conforming amendments (i) The analysis for subchapter I of chapter 553 (ii) The analysis for chapter 551 section 55122 55123. Priority loading for coal. . (2) Amendment to subchapter heading The heading of subchapter I of chapter 553 SUBCHAPTER I—GOVERNMENT IMPELLED TRANSPORTATION . 1025. Restrictions on overhaul, repair, etc. of naval vessels in foreign shipyards (a) Exception for damage repair due to hostile actions or interventions Section 8680(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking , other than in the case of voyage repairs (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a naval vessel described in paragraph (1) may be repaired in a shipyard outside the United States or Guam if the repairs are— (A) voyage repairs; or (B) necessary to correct damage sustained due to hostile actions or interventions. . (b) Limited authority to use foreign workers Section 8680(a)(2)(B)(i) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting (I) (i) (2) by adding at the end the following new subclauses: (II) Notwithstanding subclause (I), foreign workers may be used to perform corrective and preventive maintenance or repair on a vessel as described in subparagraph (A) only if the Secretary of the Navy determines that travel by United States Government personnel or United States contractor personnel to perform the corrective or preventive maintenance or repair is not advisable for health or safety reasons. The Secretary of the Navy may not delegate the authority to make a determination under this subclause. (III) Not later than 30 days after making a determination under subclause (II), the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees written notification of the determination. The notification shall include the reasons why travel by United States personnel is not advisable for health or safety reasons, the location where the corrective and preventive maintenance or repair will be performed, and the approximate duration of the corrective and preventive maintenance or repair. . (c) Technical correction Section 8680(a)(2)(C)(ii) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the period after means— 1026. Biannual report on shipbuilder training and the defense industrial base (a) In general Chapter 863 8692. Biannual report on shipbuilder training and the defense industrial base Not later than February 1 of each even-numbered year until 2026, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Labor, shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Education and Labor of the House of Representatives a report on shipbuilder training and hiring requirements necessary to achieve the Navy’s 30-year shipbuilding plan and to maintain the shipbuilding readiness of the defense industrial base. Each such report shall include each of the following: (1) An analysis and estimate of the time and investment required for new shipbuilders to gain proficiency in particular shipbuilding occupational specialties, including detailed information about the occupational specialty requirements necessary for construction of naval surface ship and submarine classes to be included in the Navy’s 30-year shipbuilding plan. (2) An analysis of the age demographics and occupational experience level (measured in years of experience) of the shipbuilding defense industrial workforce. (3) An analysis of the potential time and investment challenges associated with developing and retaining shipbuilding skills in organizations that lack intermediate levels of shipbuilding experience. (4) Recommendations concerning how to address shipbuilder training during periods of demographic transition and evolving naval fleet architecture consistent with the Navy’s 2020 Integrated Force Structure Assessment. (5) An analysis of whether emerging technologies, such as augmented reality, may aid in new shipbuilder training. (6) Recommendations concerning how to encourage young adults to enter the defense shipbuilding industry and to develop the skills necessary to support the shipbuilding defense industrial base. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 8692. Biannual report on shipbuilder training and the defense industrial base. . 1027. Prohibition on use of funds for retirement of certain littoral combat ships (a) Prohibition None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for the Navy may be obligated or expended to retire or prepare for the retirement, transfer, or placement in storage any ships designated as LCS-3 or LCS-4 until the date on which the Secretary of the Navy submits the certification required under subsection (b). (b) Certification Upon the completion of all operational tests on each of the mission modules designed for the Littoral Combat Ship, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees certification of such completion. 1028. Report on implementation of Commandant’s Planning Guidance (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the implementation of the Commandant’s Planning Guidance. Such report shall include a detailed description of each of the following: (1) The specific number and type of manned littoral ships required to execute such Guidance. (2) The role of long-range unmanned surface vessels in the execution of such Guidance. (3) How platforms referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2) account for and interact with ground-based missiles fielded by teams of Marines deployed throughout the Indo-Pacific region. (4) The integrated naval command and control architecture required to support the platforms referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2); (5) The projected cost and any additional resources required to deliver the platforms referred to in paragraph (1) and (2) by not later than five years after the date of the enactment of this Act. (b) Form of report The report required under this section shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. The unclassified report shall be made publicly available. 1029. Limitation on naval force structure changes None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for the Navy may be obligated or expended to retire, or to prepare for the retirement, transfer, or placement in storage of, any Department of the Navy ship until the date that is 30 days after the date on which Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees the 2020 Naval Integrated Force Structure Assessment. D Counterterrorism 1031. Prohibition on use of funds for transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to certain countries No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2021, to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release of any individual detained in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the custody or control of any country, or any entity within such country, as follows: (1) Libya. (2) Somalia. (3) Syria. (4) Yemen. E Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations 1041. Support of special operations to combat terrorism Section 127e of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following new subsection (c): (c) Procedures (1) In general The authority in this section shall be exercised in accordance with such procedures as the Secretary shall establish for purposes of this section. The Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees of any material change to such procedures. (2) Elements The procedures required under paragraph (1) shall establish, at a minimum, each of the following: (A) Policy, strategy, or other guidance for the execution of, and constraints within, activities conducted under this section. (B) The processes through which activities conducted under this section are to be developed, validated, and coordinated, as appropriate, with relevant Federal entities. (C) The processes through which legal reviews and determinations are made to comply with this section and ensure that the exercise of authority under this section is consistent with the national security of the United States. (3) Notice to Congress The Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a notice of the procedures established pursuant to this section before any exercise of the authority in this section, and shall notify such committees of any material change of the procedures. ; (2) in subsection (d)— (A) in the subsection heading, by inserting of initiation of support of an approved military operation Notification (B) in paragraph (1), by striking 15 30 (3) by redesignating subsections (e) through (h) as subsections (f) through (i), respectively; (4) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection (e): (e) Notification of modification or termination of support of an approved military operation (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees notice in writing by not later that— (A) 15 days before exercising the authority under this section to modify the support of an approved military operation; (B) 30 days before exercising the authority under this section to terminate the support of an approved military operation; or (C) as applicable, 30 days before exercising any other authority under which the Secretary engages or plans to engage with foreign forces, irregular forces, groups, or individuals. (2) Extraordinary circumstances If the Secretary finds the existence of extraordinary circumstances affecting the national security of the United States, the Secretary shall provide the notice required under paragraph (1) not later than 48 hours before exercising authority referred to in subparagraph (A) or (B) of such paragraph. (3) Elements Notice provided under paragraph (1) with respect to the modification or termination of support shall includes each of the following elements: (A) A description of the reasons for the modification or termination. (B) A description of the potential effects of the modification or termination of support on the forces providing the support. (C) A plan for the modification or termination of the support, including the consideration of the transition of such support from one fiscal authority to another. (D) A list of any relevant entities of the United States Government that are or will be involved in the modification or termination of such support, including any planned transition of such support from one Government entity to another. ; (5) in subsection (i)(3), as redesignated by paragraph (3)— (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (G) and (H) as subparagraphs (H) and (I), respectively; and (B) by inserting after subparagraph (F) the following new subparagraph (G): (G) If there is a plan to modify or terminate the support to military operations to combat terrorism in any way, a detailed description of the plan, including— (i) a description of the reasons for the modification or termination; (ii) the potential effects of the modification or termination of support on the forces providing the support; (iii) a detailed plan for the modification or termination of the support; and (iv) a list of any relevant Government entities that are or will be involved in the modification or termination of such support, including any planned transition of such support from one Government entity to another. ; and (6) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (j) Modification defined In this section, the term modification (1) an increase or decrease in funding of more than $750,000 or change greater than 40 percent of the material resources provided; (2) an increase or decrease in the amount or type of equipment that significantly alters the use of or risk to foreign forces, irregular forces, groups, or United States special operations forces; or (3) a change in the legal or operational authorities. . 1042. Prohibition on retirement of nuclear powered aircraft carriers before first refueling Section 8062 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (f) A nuclear powered aircraft carrier may not be retired before its first refueling. . 1043. Required minimum inventory of tactical airlift aircraft Section 9062 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (k) The Secretary of the Air Force shall maintain a total inventory of tactical airlift aircraft of not less than 292 aircraft. . 1044. Modification and technical correction to Department of Defense authority to provide assistance along the southern land border of the United States (a) Authority Subsection (a) of section 1059 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( Public Law 114–92 10 U.S.C. 271 (a) Authority (1) Provision of assistance (A) In general The Secretary of Defense may provide assistance to United States Customs and Border Protection for purposes of increasing ongoing efforts to secure the southern land border of the United States in accordance with the requirements of this section. (B) Requirements If the Secretary provides assistance under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall ensure that— (i) the provision of the assistance will not negatively affect military training, operations, readiness, or other military requirements; and (ii) the tasks associated with the support provided align with the mission or occupational specialty of any members of the Armed Forces, including members of the reserve components, or units of the Armed Forces, including the reserve components, that are deployed. (2) Notification requirement Not later than 5 days after the date on which the Secretary decides to provide assistance under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives notice of such decision. . (b) Reporting requirements Subsection (f) of such section is amended to read as follows: (f) Reports (1) Report required Any time assistance is provided under subsection (a), not later than 30 days after the date on which such assistance is first provided, and every three months thereafter during the period while such assistance is provided, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives a report that includes, for both the period covered by the report and the total period of the deployment, each of the following: (A) A description of the assistance provided. (B) A description of the Armed Forces, including the reserve components, deployed as part of such assistance, including an identification of— (i) the members of the Armed Forces, including members of the reserve components, deployed, including specific information about unit designation, size of unit, and whether any personnel in the unit deployed under section 12302 of title 10, United States Code; (ii) the readiness rating for each of the units deployed, including specific information about any impacts to planned training exercises for any such unit; (iii) the projected length of the deployment and any special pay and incentives for which deployed personnel may qualify during the deployment; (iv) any specific pre-deployment training provided for such members of the Armed Forces, including members of the reserve components; (v) the specific missions and tasks, by location, that are assigned to the members of the Armed Forces, including members of the reserve components, who are so deployed; (vi) the life support conditions and associated costs; (vii) the locations where units so deployed are conducting their assigned mission, together with a map showing such locations; (viii) a description of the rules and additional guidance applicable to the deployment, including the standing rules for the use of force for deployed personnel and the issuance of any weapons and ammunition; and (ix) the plan to transition the functions performed by the members of the Armed Forces, including members of the reserve components, to the Department of Homeland Security and Customs Border Protection. (C) The sources and amounts of funds expended— (i) during the period covered by the report; and (ii) during the total period for which such support has been provided. (D) The amount of funds obligated— (i) during the period covered by the report; and (ii) during the total period for which such support has been provided. (E) An assessment of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of such assistance in support of the objectives and strategy of the Secretary of Homeland Security to address the challenges on the southern land border of the United States and recommendations, if any, to enhance the effectiveness of such assistance. (2) Form of report Each report submitted under this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form and without any designation relating to dissemination control, but may include a classified annex. . (c) Classification The Law Revision Counsel is directed to place this section in a note following section 284 of title 10, United States Code. 1045. Battlefield airborne communications node certification requirement (a) Limitation The Secretary of the Air Force may take no action that would prevent the Air Force from maintaining or operating the fleets of EQ-4 aircraft in the configurations and capabilities in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, or in improved configurations and capabilities, before the date on which each of the three individual certifications described in subsection (b) have been submitted to the congressional defense committees. (b) Certifications required The certifications described in this subsection are the following; (1) The written certification of the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council that the replacement capability for the EQ-4 aircraft will— (A) be fielded at the same time or before the divestment of the EQ-4 aircraft; (B) result in equal or greater capability available to the commanders of the combatant commanders; and (C) not result in less airborne capacity or on-station time available to the commanders of the combatant commands. (2) The written certification of the Commander of United States Central Command that the replacement capability for the EQ-4 aircraft will not result in less airborne capacity or on-station time available for mission taskings that the EQ-4 provides, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, in the United States Central Command area of responsibility. (3) The written certification of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment that the validated operating and sustainment costs of the capability developed or fielded to replace an equivalent capacity the EQ-4 aircraft provides is less than the validated operating and sustainment costs for the EQ-4 aircraft on a comparable flight-hour cost basis. (c) Calculation of flight-hour cost basis For purposes of calculating the flight-hour cost basis under subsection (b)(3), the Under Secretary shall include all costs for— (1) Unit level manpower; (2) Unit operations; (3) maintenance; (4) sustaining support; and (5) system improvements. 1046. Requirements relating to newest generations of personal protective equipment (a) Reports (1) Reports required Not later than January 31, 2021, each Secretary of a military department shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the development and fielding of the newest generations of personal protective equipment to the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of such Secretary. (2) Elements Each report under paragraph (1) shall include, for each Armed Force covered by such report, the following: (A) A description and assessment of the development and fielding of the newest generations of personal protective equipment and auxiliary personal protective equipment to members of such Armed Force, including the following: (i) The number (aggregated by total number and by sex) of members of such Armed Force issued the Army Soldiers Protective System and the Modular Scalable Vest Generation II body armor as of December 31, 2020. (ii) The number (aggregated by total number and by sex) of members of such Armed Force issued Marine Corps Plate Carrier Generation III (PC Gen III) body armor as of that date. (iii) The number (aggregated by total number and by sex) of members of such Armed Force fitted with legacy personal protective equipment as of that date. (B) A description and assessment of the barriers, if any, to the development and fielding of such generations of equipment to such members. (C) A description and assessment of challenges in the development and fielding of such generations of equipment to such members, including cost overruns, contractor delays, and other challenges. (b) System for tracking data on injuries (1) System required (A) In general The Director of the Defense Health Agency (DHA) shall develop and maintain a system for tracking data on injuries among members of the Armed Forces in and during the use of newest generation personal protective equipment. (B) Scope of system The system required by this subsection may, at the election of the Director, be new for purposes of this subsection or within or a modification of an appropriate existing system (such as the Defense Occupational And Environmental Health Readiness System (DOEHRS)). (2) Report Not later than January 31, 2025, the Director shall submit to Congress a report on the prevalence among members of the Armed Forces of preventable injuries attributable to ill-fitting or malfunctioning personal protective equipment. (c) Inclusion in annual periodic health assessments The annual Periodic Health Assessment (PHA) of members of the Armed Forces undertaken after the date of the enactment of this Act shall include one or more questions on whether members incurred an injury in connection with ill-fitting or malfunctioning personal protective equipment during the period covered by such assessment, including the nature of such injury. 1047. Prohibition on use of funds for retirement of A-10 aircraft (a) Prohibition Notwithstanding sections 134 and 135 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 (b) Exception The limitation under subsection (a) shall not apply to any individual A-10 aircraft that the Secretary of the Air Force determines, on a case-by-case basis, to be no longer mission capable because of a mishap or other damage or because the aircraft is uneconomical to repair. 1048. Mandatory criteria for strategic basing decisions (a) In general The Secretary of the Air Force shall modify Air Force Instruction 10–503 (pertaining to the strategic basing process) to ensure that the process for the selection of a location in the United States for the strategic basing of an aircraft includes the following: (1) A comparative analysis of the overall community support for the mission among the candidate locations, as indicated by the formal comments received during the public comment period for the environmental impact statement relating to the basing decision and, in a case in which the Secretary selects a final location with less community support compared to other locations as indicated by such analysis, an explanation of the operational considerations that formed the basis for such selection. (2) An analysis of joint and all-domain training capabilities at each candidate location, separate from and in addition to the mission criteria developed for the basing action. (3) A comparative analysis of the airspace and training areas available at each candidate location, separate from and in addition to the mission criteria developed for the basing action. (b) Report required Not later than 14 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense publicly announces the preferred and reasonable alternative locations for the basing of an aircraft as described in subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes— (1) an assessment of each candidate location that was considered as part of the basing process, including, with respect to each such location, an analysis of each of the factors specified in paragraphs (1) through (3) of such subsection; and (2) an explanation of how each candidate location was scored against such factors, including the weight assigned to each factor. 1049. Limitation on use of funds pending public availability of top-line numbers of deployed members of the Armed Forces (a) Limitation Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide, Office of the Secretary of Defense, for Travel of Persons, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of Defense makes publicly available the top-line numbers of deployed members of the Armed Forces described in subsection (b). (b) Top-line numbers described The top-line numbers of deployed members of the Armed Forces referred to in subsection (a)— (1) are the numbers required to be made publicly available under section 595 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 10 U.S.C. 122a (2) shall include all such numbers for fiscal year 2017 and each subsequent fiscal year; and (3) shall include the number of personnel on temporary duty and the number of personnel deployed in support of contingency operations. (c) Sensitive military operation The requirement under subsection (a) to make the top-line numbers of deployed members of the Armed Forces publicly available is not satisfied if the Secretary, in exercising the waiver authority under subsection (b) of section 595 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 10 U.S.C. 122a 1050. Limitation on physical move, integration, reassignment, or shift in responsibility of Marine Forces Northern Command (a) Limitation The Secretary of Defense may not take any action to execute the physical move, integration, reassignment, or shift in responsibility of the Marine Forces Northern Command before the date that is 60 days after the date on which the Secretary submits the report described in subsection (b). (b) Report If the Secretary of Defense plans to take any action to physically move, integrate, reassign, or shift the responsibility of Marine Forces Northern Command, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on such proposed action that includes each of the following: (1) An analysis of how the proposed action would be beneficial to military readiness. (2) A description of how the proposed action would align with the national defense strategy and the supporting strategies for each of the military departments. (3) A description of the proposed organizational structure change associated with the action and how will it affect the relationship between Marine Forces Northern Command and administrative control responsibilities, operational control responsibilities, and tactical control responsibilities. (4) The projected cost associated with the proposed action and any projected long-term cost savings. (5) A detailed description of any requirements for new infrastructure or relocation of equipment and assets associated with the proposed action. (6) A description of how the proposed action would facilitate total force integration and Marine Corps general officer progression, including with respect to the reserve components. (c) Waiver The Secretary may waive the limitation under subsection (a) if the Secretary determines such a waiver is necessary by reason of hostilities or the imminent threat of hostilities. (d) Applicability This section shall apply with respect to any action to execute the physical move, integration, reassignment, or shift in responsibility of the Marine Forces Northern Command that is initiated on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. In the case of such an action that was initiated but not completed before the date of the enactment of this Act, no additional effort may be made to complete such action before the date that is 60 days after the date on which the Secretary submits the report described in subsection (b). 1051. Conditions for permanently basing United States equipment or additional forces in host countries with at-risk vendors in 5G or 6G networks (a) In general Prior to basing a major weapon system or additional permanently assigned forces comparable to or larger than a battalion, squadron, or naval combatant for permanent basing to a host country with at-risk 5th generation (5G) or sixth generation (6G) wireless network equipment, software, and services, including supply chain vulnerabilities identified by the Federal Acquisition Security Council, where United States military personnel and their families will be directly connected or subscribers to networks that include such at-risk equipment, software, and services in their official duties or in the conduct of personal affairs, the Secretary of Defense shall provide a notification to the congressional defense committees that includes a description of— (1) steps being taken by the host country to mitigate any potential risks to the weapon systems, military units, or personnel, and the Department of Defense’s assessment of those efforts; (2) steps being taken by the United States Government, separately or in collaboration with the host country, to mitigate any potential risks to the weapon systems, permanently deployed forces, or personnel; (3) any defense mutual agreements between the host country and the United States intended to allay the costs of risk mitigation posed by the at-risk infrastructure; and (4) any other matters the Secretary determines to be relevant. (b) Applicability The conditions in subsection (a) apply to the permanent long-term stationing of equipment and permanently assigned forces, and do not apply to short-term deployments or rotational presence to military installations outside the United States in connection with exercises, dynamic force employment, contingency operations, or combat operations. (c) Report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that contains an assessment of— (1) the risk to personnel, equipment, and operations of the Department of Defense in host countries posed by the current or intended use by such countries of 5G or 6G telecommunications architecture provided by at-risk vendors; and (2) measures required to mitigate the risk described in paragraph (1), including the merit and feasibility of the relocation of certain personnel or equipment of the Department to another location without the presence of 5G or 6G telecommunications architecture provided by at-risk vendors. (d) Form The report required by subsection (c) shall be submitted in a classified form with an unclassified summary. (e) Major weapon system defined In this section, the term major weapon system XI Civilian Personnel Matters A General Provisions 1101. Family and medical leave amendments (a) In general (1) Paid parental leave for employees of District of Columbia courts and District of Columbia Public Defender Service (A) District of Columbia courts Section 11–1726, District of Columbia Official Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (d) In carrying out the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 ( 29 U.S.C. 2601 29 U.S.C. 2612(a)(1) chapter 63 . (B) District of Columbia Public Defender Service Section 305 of the District of Columbia Court Reform and Criminal Procedure Act of 1970 (sec. 2–1605, D.C. Official Code) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (d) In carrying out the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 ( 29 U.S.C. 2601 29 U.S.C. 2612(a)(1) chapter 63 . (2) Clarification of use of other leave in addition to 12 weeks as Family and Medical Leave (A) Title 5 Section 6382(a) of title 5, United States Code, as amended by section 7602 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (i) in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting (or, in the case of leave that includes leave under subparagraph (A) or (B) of this paragraph, 12 administrative workweeks of leave plus any additional period of leave used under subsection (d)(2)(B)(ii)) 12 administrative workweeks of leave (ii) in paragraph (4), by inserting (or 26 administrative workweeks of leave plus any additional period of leave used under subsection (d)(2)(B)(ii)) 26 administrative workweeks of leave (B) Congressional employees Section 202(a)(1) of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 ( 2 U.S.C. 1312(a)(1) Public Law 116–92 (i) in the second sentence, by inserting and in the case of leave that includes leave for such an event, the period of leave to which a covered employee is entitled under section 102(a)(1) of such Act shall be 12 administrative workweeks of leave plus any additional period of leave used under subsection (d)(2)(B) of this section (ii) by striking the third sentence and inserting the following: For purposes of applying section 102(a)(4) of such Act, in the case of leave that includes leave under subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 102(a)(1) of such Act, a covered employee is entitled, under paragraphs (1) and (3) of section 102(a) of such Act, to a combined total of 26 workweeks of leave plus any additional period of leave used under subsection (d)(2)(B) of this section. (C) Other employees covered under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 Section 102(a) of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 ( 29 U.S.C. 2611(a) (6) Special rules on period of leave With respect to an employee of the Government Accountability Office and an employee of the Library of Congress— (A) in the case of leave that includes leave under subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1), the employee shall be entitled to 12 administrative workweeks of leave plus any additional period of leave used under subsection (d)(3)(B)(ii) of this section or section 202(d)(2)(B) of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 ( 2 U.S.C. 1312(d)(2)(B) (B) for purposes of paragraph (4), the employee is entitled, under paragraphs (1) and (3), to a combined total of 26 workweeks of leave plus, if applicable, any additional period of leave used under subsection (d)(3)(B)(ii) of this section or section 202(d)(2)(B) of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 ( 2 U.S.C. 1312(d)(2)(B) . (3) Applicability The amendments made by this subsection shall not be effective with respect to any birth or placement occurring before October 1, 2020. (b) Paid parental leave for presidential employees (1) Amendments to chapter 5 Section 412 of title 3, United States Code, is amended— (A) in subsection (a)(1), by adding at the end the following: In applying section 102 of such Act with respect to leave for an event described in subsection (a)(1)(A) or (B) of such section to covered employees, subsection (c) of this section shall apply and in the case of leave that includes leave for such an event, the period of leave to which a covered employee is entitled under section 102(a)(1) of such Act shall be 12 administrative workweeks of leave plus any additional period of leave used under subsection (c)(2)(B) of this section. For purposes of applying section 102(a)(4) of such Act, in the case of leave that includes leave under subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 102(a)(1) of such Act, a covered employee is entitled, under paragraphs (1) and (3) of section 102(a) of such Act, to a combined total of 26 workweeks of leave plus any additional period of leave used under subsection (c)(2)(B) of this section. (B) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (d) and (e), respectively; (C) by inserting after subsection (b) the following: (c) Special rule for paid parental leave (1) Substitution of paid leave A covered employee may elect to substitute for any leave without pay under subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 102(a)(1) of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 ( 29 U.S.C. 2612(a)(1) (2) Amount of paid leave The paid leave that is available to a covered employee for purposes of paragraph (1) is— (A) the number of weeks of paid parental leave in connection with the birth or placement involved that corresponds to the number of administrative workweeks of paid parental leave available to employees under section 6382(d)(2)(B)(i) of title 5, United States Code; and (B) during the 12-month period referred to in section 102(a)(1) of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 ( 29 U.S.C. 2612(a)(1) (3) Limitation Nothing in this section or section 102(d)(2)(A) of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 ( 29 U.S.C. 2612(d)(2)(A) (4) Additional rules Paid parental leave under paragraph (2)(A)— (A) shall be payable from any appropriation or fund available for salaries or expenses for positions within the employing office; (B) if not used by the covered employee before the end of the 12-month period (as referred to in section 102(a)(1) of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 ( 29 U.S.C. 2612(a)(1) (C) shall apply without regard to the limitations in subparagraph (E), (F), or (G) of section 6382(d)(2) of title 5, United States Code, or section 104(c)(2) of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 ( 29 U.S.C. 2614(c)(2) ; and (D) in subsection (e)(1), as so redesignated, by striking subsection (c) subsection (d) (2) Applicability The amendments made by this subsection shall not be effective with respect to any birth or placement occurring before October 1, 2020. (c) FAA and TSA (1) FAA (A) In general Paragraph (3) of section 102(d) of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 ( 29 U.S.C. 2612(d)(3) Public Law 116–92 (i) in the paragraph heading, by inserting and Federal Aviation Administration GAO (ii) in subparagraphs (A) and (B), by striking the Government Accountability Office the Government Accountability Office or the Federal Aviation Administration (iii) in subparagraph (D)(i), by striking the Government Accountability Office the Government Accountability Office or the Federal Aviation Administration (as the case may be) (B) Applicability The amendments made by subparagraph (A) shall not be effective with respect to any birth or placement occurring before October 1, 2020. (2) Corrections for TSA screeners Section 7606 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (A) by striking Section 111(d)(2) (a) In general Section 111(d)(2) ; and (B) by adding at the end the following: (b) Effective date; application (1) In general The amendment made by subsection (a) shall not be effective with respect to any event for which leave may be taken under subchapter V of chapter 63 (2) Application to service requirement for eligibility For purposes of applying the period of service requirement under subparagraph (B) of section 6381(1) to an individual appointed under section 111(d)(1) of the Aviation and Transportation Security Act ( 49 U.S.C. 44935 . (d) Title 38 employees (1) In general Section 7425 of title 38, United States Code, is amended— (A) in subsection (b), by striking Notwithstanding Except as provided in subsection (c), and notwithstanding (B) by adding at the end the following: (c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, the Administration shall provide to individuals appointed to any position described in section 7421(b) who are employed by the Administration family and medical leave in the same manner, to the maximum extent practicable, as family and medical leave is provided under subchapter V of chapter 63 . (2) Applicability The amendments made by paragraph (1) shall not be effective with respect to any event for which leave may be taken under subchapter V of chapter 63 (e) Article I judges (1) Bankruptcy judges Section 153(d) of title 28, United States Code, is amended— (A) by striking A bankruptcy judge (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), a bankruptcy judge (B) by adding at the end the following: (2) The provisions of subchapter V of chapter 63 . (2) Magistrate judges Section 631(k) of title 28, United States Code, is amended— (A) by striking A United States magistrate judge (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), a United States magistrate judge (B) by adding at the end the following: (2) The provisions of subchapter V of chapter 63 . (3) Applicability The amendments made by this subsection shall not be effective with respect to any birth or placement occurring before October 1, 2020. (f) Technical corrections (1) Section 7605 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 on active duty on covered active duty (2) Subparagraph (E) of section 6382(d)(2) of title 5, United States Code, as added by section 7602 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 the requirement to complete the service requirement under subparagraph (B) of section 6381(1). (3) Section 202(d)(2)(B) of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 ( 2 U.S.C. 1312(d)(2)(B) Public Law 116–92 accrued sick leave (g) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect as if enacted immediately after the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 1102. Limitation on authority to exclude employees from chapter 71 None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for the Department of Defense may be used to carry out the authority provided under section 7103(b) of title 5, United States Code, to exclude the Department of Defense or any agency or subdivision thereof from coverage under chapter 71 of such title. 1103. Authority to provide travel and transportation allowances in connection with transfer ceremonies of department of defense and coast guard civilian employees who die overseas (a) Travel and transportation allowances (1) In general Subchapter II of chapter 75 1492. Authority to provide travel and transportation allowances in connection with transfer ceremonies of department of defense and coast guard civilian employees who die overseas The Secretary of the military department concerned, the agency head of a Defense Agency or Department of Defense Field Activity, or the Secretary of Homeland Security, as appropriate, may provide round trip travel and transportation allowances in connection with ceremonies for the transfer of a Department of Defense or Coast Guard civilian employee who dies while located or serving overseas to eligible relatives and provide for the accompaniment of such persons to the same extent as the Secretary of Defense may provide such travel and transportation allowances and accompaniment services to such persons with respect to a deceased service member under chapter 8 . (2) Clerical amendment The table of contents at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 1492. Authority to provide travel and transportation allowances in connection with transfer ceremonies of department of defense and coast guard civilian employees who die overseas. . (b) Technical amendments Section 481f(d) of title 37, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the subsection heading, by striking Transportation to Travel and transportation allowances in connection with (2) in paragraph (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking transportation to travel and transportation allowances in connection with 1104. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for federal civilian employees working overseas Subsection (a) of section 1101 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( Public Law 110–417 Public Law 116–92 through 2020 through 2021 1105. One-year extension of temporary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to civilian personnel on official duty in a combat zone Paragraph (2) of section 1603(a) of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 ( Public Law 109–234 Public Law 110–417 Public Law 116–92 2021 2022 1106. Limiting the number of local wage areas defined within a pay locality (a) Local wage area limitation Section 5343(a) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)(B)(i), by striking (but such are employed) (2) in paragraph (4), by striking and (3) in paragraph (5), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and (4) by adding at the end of the following: (6) the Office of Personnel Management may define not more than 1 local wage area within a pay locality, except that this paragraph shall not apply to the pay locality designated as Rest of United States . (b) Pay locality defined Section 5342(a) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking and (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (4) pay locality . (c) Regulations The Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall prescribe any regulations necessary to carry out this section and the amendments made by this section, including regulations to ensure that this section and the amendments made by this section shall not have the effect of reducing any rate of basic pay payable to any individual who is serving as a prevailing rate employee (as defined under section 5342(a)(2) of title 5, United States Code). (d) Effective date This section and the amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2022 and each fiscal year thereafter. 1107. Civilian Faculty At the Defense Security Cooperation University and Institute of Security Governance Section 1595(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: (6) The Defense Security Cooperation University. (7) The Defense Institute for Security Governance. . 1108. Expansion of authority for appointment of recently-retired members of the armed forces to positions at certain industrial base facilities (a) In general Subsection (b) of section 3326 of title 5, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking or (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; or (3) by adding at the end the following: (3) the proposed appointment is to a position in the competitive service— (A) at any industrial base facility (as that term is defined in section 2208(u)(3) of title 10) that is part of the core logistics capabilities (as described in section 2464(a) of such title); and (B) that has been certified by the Secretary concerned as lacking sufficient numbers of qualified applicants. . (b) Limitation on delegation of certification authority Such section 3326 is further amended by adding at the end the following: (d) The authority to make a certification described in subsection (b)(3) may not be delegated to an individual with a grade lower than colonel, or captain in the Navy, or an inriviaul with an equivalent civilian grade. . (c) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that the amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) shall supplement, and not provide any exception to, the competitive hiring process for the Federal civil service. 1109. Fire Fighters Alternative Work Schedule demonstration project (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commander, Navy Region Mid-Atlantic, shall establish and carry out, for a period of not less than 5 years, a Fire Fighters Alternative Work Schedule demonstration project for the Navy Region Mid-Atlantic Fire and Emergency Services. Such demonstration project shall provide, with respect to each Services employee, that— (1) assignments to tours of duty are scheduled in advance over periods of not less than two weeks; (2) tours of duty are scheduled using a regularly recurring pattern of 48-hour shifts followed by 48 or 72 consecutive non-work hours, as determined by mutual agreement between the Navy Region Mid-Atlantic and the exclusive employee representative at each Navy Region Mid-Atlantic Installation, in such a manner that each employee is regularly scheduled for 144-hours in any two-week period; (3) for any such employee that is a fire fighter working an alternative work schedule, such employee shall earn overtime compensation in a manner consistent with other applicable law and regulation; (4) no right shall be established to any form of premium pay, including night, Sunday, holiday, or hazard duty pay; and (5) leave accrual and use shall be consistent with other applicable law and regulation. (b) Report Not later than 180 days following the end of such demonstration project, the Commander, Navy Region Mid-Atlantic, shall submit a report to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate detailing— (1) any financial savings or expenses directly and inseparably linked to the demonstration project; (2) any intangible quality of life and morale improvements achieved by the demonstration project; and (3) any adverse impact of the demonstration project occurring solely as the result of the transition to the demonstration project. 1110. Special rules for certain monthly workers’ compensation payments and other payments for Federal Government personnel under chief of mission authority Section 901 of title IX of division J of the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 ( Public Law 116–94 22 U.S.C. 2680b (1) in subsection (a), by inserting or the head of any other Federal agency The Secretary of State (2) in subsection (e)(2)— (A) by striking the Department of State the Federal Government (B) by inserting after subsection (f) , but does not include an individual receiving compensation under section 19A of the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949 ( 50 U.S.C. 3519b (3) in subsection (h)(2), by striking the first sentence and inserting the following: Nothing in this section shall limit, modify, or otherwise supersede chapter 81 42 U.S.C. 1651 50 U.S.C. 3519b B Elijah E. Cummings Federal Employee Antidiscrimination Act of 2020 1121. Short title This subtitle may be cited as the Elijah E. Cummings Federal Employee Antidiscrimination Act of 2020 1122. Sense of Congress Section 102 of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 ( 5 U.S.C. 2301 (1) by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the following: (4) accountability in the enforcement of the rights of Federal employees is furthered when Federal agencies agree to take appropriate disciplinary action against Federal employees who are found to have intentionally committed discriminatory (including retaliatory) acts; ; and (2) in paragraph (5)(A)— (A) by striking nor is accountability accountability is not (B) by inserting for what, by law, the agency is responsible under this Act 1123. Notification of violation Section 202 of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 ( 5 U.S.C. 2301 (d) Notification of final agency action (1) In general Not later than 90 days after the date on which an event described in paragraph (2) occurs with respect to a finding of discrimination (including retaliation), the head of the Federal agency subject to the finding shall provide notice— (A) on the public internet website of the agency, in a clear and prominent location linked directly from the home page of that website; (B) stating that a finding of discrimination (including retaliation) has been made; and (C) which shall remain posted for not less than 1 year. (2) Events described An event described in this paragraph is any of the following: (A) All appeals of a final action by a Federal agency involving a finding of discrimination (including retaliation) prohibited by a provision of law covered by paragraph (1) or (2) of section 201(a) have been exhausted. (B) All appeals of a final decision by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission involving a finding of discrimination (including if the finding included a finding of retaliation) prohibited by a provision of law covered by paragraph (1) or (2) of section 201(a) have been exhausted. (C) A court of jurisdiction issues a final judgment involving a finding of discrimination (including retaliation) prohibited by a provision of law covered by paragraph (1) or (2) of section 201(a). (3) Contents A notification provided under paragraph (1) with respect to a finding of discrimination (including retaliation) shall— (A) identify the date on which the finding was made, the date on which each discriminatory act occurred, and the law violated by each such discriminatory act; and (B) advise Federal employees of the rights and protections available under the provisions of law covered by paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 201(a). . 1124. Reporting requirements (a) Electronic format requirement (1) In general Section 203(a) of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 ( 5 U.S.C. 2301 (A) by inserting Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (B) by striking on Government Reform on Oversight and Reform (C) by inserting (in an electronic format prescribed by the Director of the Office of Personnel Management), an annual report (2) Effective date The amendment made by paragraph (1)(C) shall take effect on the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act. (3) Transition period Notwithstanding the requirements of section 203(a) of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 ( 5 U.S.C. 2301 (b) Reporting requirement for disciplinary action Section 203 of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 ( 5 U.S.C. 2301 (c) Disciplinary action report Not later than 120 days after the date on which a Federal agency takes final action, or a Federal agency receives a final decision issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, involving a finding of discrimination (including retaliation) in violation of a provision of law covered by paragraph (1) or (2) of section 201(a), as applicable, the applicable Federal agency shall submit to the Commission a report stating— (1) whether disciplinary action has been proposed against a Federal employee as a result of the violation; and (2) the reasons for any disciplinary action proposed under paragraph (1). . 1125. Data to be posted by employing Federal agencies Section 301(b) of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 ( 5 U.S.C. 2301 (1) in paragraph (9)— (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking and (B) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking the period at the end and inserting , and (C) by adding at the end the following: (C) with respect to each finding described in subparagraph (A)— (i) the date of the finding, (ii) the affected Federal agency, (iii) the law violated, and (iv) whether a decision has been made regarding disciplinary action as a result of the finding. ; and (2) by adding at the end the following: (11) Data regarding each class action complaint filed against the agency alleging discrimination (including retaliation), including— (A) information regarding the date on which each complaint was filed, (B) a general summary of the allegations alleged in the complaint, (C) an estimate of the total number of plaintiffs joined in the complaint, if known, (D) the current status of the complaint, including whether the class has been certified, and (E) the case numbers for the civil actions in which discrimination (including retaliation) has been found. . 1126. Data to be posted by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Section 302(b) of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 ( 5 U.S.C. 2301 (10) (11) 1127. Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 amendments (a) Notification requirements Title II of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 ( 5 U.S.C. 2301 207. Complaint tracking Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Elijah E. Cummings Federal Employee Antidiscrimination Act of 2020, each Federal agency shall establish a system to track each complaint of discrimination arising under section 2302(b)(1) of title 5, United States Code, and adjudicated through the Equal Employment Opportunity process from the filing of a complaint with the Federal agency to resolution of the complaint, including whether a decision has been made regarding disciplinary action as the result of a finding of discrimination. 208. Notation in personnel record If a Federal agency takes an adverse action covered under section 7512 of title 5, United States Code, against a Federal employee for an act of discrimination (including retaliation) prohibited by a provision of law covered by paragraph (1) or (2) of section 201(a), the agency shall, after all appeals relating to that action have been exhausted, include a notation of the adverse action and the reason for the action in the personnel record of the employee. . (b) Processing and referral The Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 ( 5 U.S.C. 2301 IV PROCESSING AND REFERRAL 401. Processing and resolution of complaints Each Federal agency shall— (1) be responsible for the fair and impartial processing and resolution of complaints of employment discrimination (including retaliation) prohibited by a provision of law covered by paragraph (1) or (2) of section 201(a); and (2) establish a model Equal Employment Opportunity Program that— (A) is not under the control, either structurally or practically, of the agency’s Office of Human Capital or Office of the General Counsel (or the equivalent); (B) is devoid of internal conflicts of interest and ensures fairness and inclusiveness within the agency; and (C) ensures the efficient and fair resolution of complaints alleging discrimination (including retaliation). 402. No limitation on advice or counsel Nothing in this title shall prevent a Federal agency or a subcomponent of a Federal agency, or the Department of Justice, from providing advice or counsel to employees of that agency (or subcomponent, as applicable) in the resolution of a complaint. 403. Head of program supervised by head of agency The head of each Federal agency’s Equal Employment Opportunity Program shall report directly to the head of the agency. 404. Referrals of findings of discrimination (a) Eeoc findings of discrimination (1) In general Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (referred to in this section as the Commission (2) Notifications The Commission shall— (A) notify the applicable Federal agency if the Commission refers a matter to the Office of Special Counsel under paragraph (1); and (B) with respect to a fiscal year, include in the Annual Report of the Federal Workforce of the Commission covering that fiscal year— (i) the number of referrals made under paragraph (1) during that fiscal year; and (ii) a brief summary of each referral described in clause (i). (b) Referrals to special counsel The Office of Special Counsel shall accept and review a referral from the Commission under subsection (a)(1) for purposes of pursuing disciplinary action under the authority of the Office against a Federal employee who commits an act of discrimination (including retaliation). (c) Notification The Office of Special Counsel shall notify the Commission and the applicable Federal agency in a case in which— (1) the Office of Special Counsel pursues disciplinary action under subsection (b); and (2) the Federal agency imposes some form of disciplinary action against a Federal employee who commits an act of discrimination (including retaliation). (d) Special counsel approval A Federal agency may not take disciplinary action against a Federal employee for an alleged act of discrimination (including retaliation) referred by the Commission under this section, except in accordance with the requirements of section 1214(f) of title 5, United States Code. . (c) Conforming amendments The table of contents in section 1(b) of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 ( 5 U.S.C. 2301 (1) by inserting after the item relating to section 206 the following: Sec. 207. Complaint tracking. Sec. 208. Notation in personnel record. ; and (2) by adding at the end the following: Title IV—PROCESSING AND REFERRAL Sec. 401. Processing and resolution of complaints. Sec. 402. No limitation on advice or counsel. Sec. 403. Head of Program supervised by head of agency. Sec. 404. Referrals of findings of discrimination. . 1128. Nondisclosure agreement limitation Section 2302(b)(13) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking agreement does not agreement— (A) does not ; (2) in subparagraph (A), as so designated, by inserting or the Office of Special Counsel Inspector General (3) by adding at the end the following: (B) prohibits or restricts an employee or applicant for employment from disclosing to Congress, the Special Counsel, the Inspector General of an agency, or any other agency component responsible for internal investigation or review any information that relates to any violation of any law, rule, or regulation, or mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, or any other whistleblower protection; or . XII Matters relating to foreign nations A Assistance and training 1201. Modification and extension of support of special operations for irregular warfare (a) Authority Subsection (a) of section 1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 (1) by striking $10,000,000 $15,000,000 (2) by striking 2023 2025 (b) Notification Subsection (d)(2) of such section is amended— (1) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (G); (2) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following: (E) A description of steps taken to ensure the support is consistent with other United States diplomatic and security interests, including issues related to local political dynamics, civil-military relations, and human rights. (F) A description of steps taken to ensure that the recipients of the support have not and will not engage in human rights violations or violations of the Geneva Conventions of 1949, including vetting, training, and support for adequately investigating allegations of violations and removing support in case of credible reports of violations. ; and (3) in clause (i) of subparagraph (G), as redesignated, to read as follows: (i) An introduction of United States Armed Forces (including as such term is defined in section 8(c) of the War Powers Resolution ( 50 U.S.C. 1547(c) 50 U.S.C. 1544(b) . (c) Construction of authority Subsection (f)(2) of such section is amended by striking of section 5(b) (d) Clarification Such section, as so amended, is further amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (g), (h), and (i) as subsections (h), (i), and (j), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following: (g) Clarification The provision of support to foreign forces, irregular forces, groups, or individuals pursuant to subsection (a) constitutes support to a unit of a foreign security force for purposes of section 362 of title 10, United States Code. . 1202. Department of Defense participation in European Program on Multilateral Exchange of Surface Transportation Services (a) In general Subchapter II of chapter 138 2350o. Participation in European Program on Multilateral Exchange of Surface Transportation Services (a) Participation authorized (1) The Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, authorize the participation of the United States in the Surface Exchange of Services program (in this section referred to as the SEOS program (2) Participation in the SEOS program under paragraph (1) may include— (A) the reciprocal exchange or transfer of surface transportation on a reimbursable basis or by replacement-in-kind; or (B) the exchange of surface transportation services of equal value. (b) Written arrangements or agreements (1) The participation of the United States in the SEOS program under subsection (a) shall be in accordance with a written arrangement or agreement entered into by the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, and the Movement Coordination Centre Europe. (2) If facilities, equipment, or funds of the Department of Defense are used to support the SEOS program, the written arrangement or agreement entered into under paragraph (1) shall specify the details of any equitable cost sharing or other funding arrangement. (3) Any written arrangement or agreement entered into under paragraph (1) shall require that any accrued credits and liabilities resulting from an unequal exchange or transfer of surface transportation services shall be liquidated, not less than once every five years, through the SEOS program. (c) Implementation In carrying out any arrangement or agreement entered into under subsection (b)(1), the Secretary of Defense may— (1) from funds available to the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance, pay the equitable share of the United States for the operating expenses of the Movement Coordination Centre Europe and the SEOS program; and (2) assign members of the armed forces or civilian personnel of the Department of Defense, from among members and personnel within billets authorized for the United States European Command, to duty at the Movement Coordination Centre Europe as necessary to fulfill the obligations of the United States under that arrangement or agreement. (d) Crediting of receipts Any amount received by the United States as part of the SEOS program shall be credited, at the option of the Secretary of Defense, to— (1) the appropriation, fund, or account used in incurring the obligation for which such amount is received; or (2) an appropriate appropriation, fund, or account currently available for the purposes for which the expenditures were made. (e) Expiration The authority provided by this section to participate in the SEOS program shall expire five years after the date on which the Secretary of Defense first enters into a written arrangement or agreement under subsection (b). The Secretary shall publish notice of such date on a public website of the Department of Defense. (f) Limitation on statutory construction Nothing in this section may be construed to authorize the use of foreign sealift in violation of section 2631 of this title. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 2350o. Participation in European program on multilateral exchange of surface transportation services. . 1203. Extension of authority to transfer excess high mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles to foreign countries Section 1276 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 (1) in subsection (b)(2)— (A) in subparagraph(A), by adding at the end the following: Such description may include, if applicable, a description of the priority United States security or defense cooperation interest with the recipient country that is fulfilled by the waiver. (B) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following: (B) An explanation of why it is in the national interests of the United States to make the transfer notwithstanding the requirements of subsection (a)(1). ; and (2) in subsection (c)(2), by striking three five 1204. Modification and extension of update of Department of Defense Freedom of Navigation Report (a) In general Subsection (a) of section 1275 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 (1) by striking an annual basis a biannual basis (2) by striking the previous year the previous 6 months (b) Elements Subsection (b) of such section is amended— (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking the year the period (2) in paragraph (1), by inserting the number of maritime and overflight challenges to each such claim and the country (3) in paragraph (5), by inserting have been protested by the United States but have not been challenged (4) by adding at the end the following: (6) A summary of each excessive maritime claim challenged jointly with international partners and allies. . (c) Form Subsection (c) of such section is amended by adding at the end before the period the following: and made publicly available (d) Sunset Subsection (d) of such section is amended by striking December 31, 2021 December 31, 2025 (e) Conforming amendment The heading of such section is amended by striking annual biannual 1205. Extension of report on workforce development Section 1250(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 through 2021 through 2026 B Matters relating to Afghanistan and Pakistan 1211. Extension and modification of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations (a) Extension Subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( Public Law 110–181 October 1, 2019, and ending on December 31, 2020 October 1, 2020, and ending on December 31, 2021 (b) Modification to limitation Subsection (d)(1) of such section is amended— (1) by striking October 1, 2019, and ending on December 31, 2020 October 1, 2020, and ending on December 31, 2021 (2) by striking $450,000,000 $180,000,000 1212. Extension of the Afghan Special Immigrant Visa Program (a) In general Section 602(b)(3)(F) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 ( 8 U.S.C. 1101 (1) in the heading, by striking 2020 2021 (2) in clause (i), by striking December 31, 2021 December 31, 2022 (3) in clause (ii), the striking December 31, 2021 December 31, 2022 (b) Report extension Section 602(b)(13) of such Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1101 January 31, 2021 January 31, 2023 1213. Limitation on use of funds to reduce deployment to Afghanistan (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) it is in the national security interests of the United States to deny terrorists safe haven in Afghanistan, protect the United States homeland, uphold the United States partnership with the Government of Afghanistan and cooperation with the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces, and protect the hard-fought rights of women, girls, and other vulnerable populations in Afghanistan; (2) a rapid military drawdown and a lack of United States commitment to the security and stability of Afghanistan would undermine diplomatic efforts for peace; (3) the current agreement between the United States and the Taliban does not provide for the appropriate protections for vulnerable populations, does not create conditions for the rejection of violence and prevention of terrorist safe havens, and does not represent a realistic diplomatic solution, based on verifiable facts and conditions on the ground, that provides for long-term stability; and (4) the Administration has a constitutional obligation to provide Congress with timely and comprehensive information on the status of security operations and diplomatic efforts in a form that can be transparently communicated to the American people. (b) Limitation Until the date on which the Secretary of Defense, in concurrence with each covered official, submits the report described in subsection (c) (1) Reducing the total number of Armed Forces deployed to Afghanistan below the lesser of— (A) 8,000, or (B) the total number of the Armed Forces deployed as of the date of the enactment of this Act. (2) Reducing the total number of Armed Forces deployed to Afghanistan below 4,000. (c) Report The report described in this subsection shall include each of the following: (1) A certification that the intended withdrawal of the United States Armed Forces in Afghanistan— (A) will not compromise or otherwise negatively affect the ongoing United States counterterrorism mission against the Islamic State, al-Qaeda, and associated forces; (B) will not unduly increase the risk to United States personnel in Afghanistan; (C) will not increase the risk for the expansion of existing or formation of new terrorist safe havens inside Afghanistan; (D) will be undertaken with the consultation and coordination of allies supporting the United States- and North Atlantic Treaty Organization-led missions; and (E) is in the best interest of United States national security and in furtherance of United States policy toward Afghanistan for achieving an enduring diplomatic solution. (2) An analysis of the impact that the intended withdrawal of United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan would have on each of the following: (A) The threat posed by the Taliban and terrorist organizations, including by each covered terrorist organization, to— (i) the United States homeland; (ii) United States interests abroad; (iii) allied countries of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization; (iv) the Government of Afghanistan; and (v) regional peace and security. (B) The status of the human and civil rights (including access to voting, education, justice, and economic opportunities) of women, girls, people with disabilities, religious and ethnic minorities, and other vulnerable populations in Afghanistan. (C) Transparent, credible, and inclusive political processes in Afghanistan. (D) The capacity of the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces to effectively— (i) prevent or defend against attacks by the Taliban or by terrorist organizations (including by each covered terrorist organization) on civilian populations; (ii) prevent the takeover of one or more provincial capitals by the Taliban or by associated organizations; (iii) conduct counterterrorism operations necessary to deny safe harbor to terrorist organizations, including each covered terrorist organization; and (iv) maintain institutional order and discipline. (E) The influence of malign state actors on the sovereignty of Afghanistan and the strategic national security interests of the United States in the region. (F) Any other matter the Secretary of Defense, in concurrence with each covered official, determines appropriate. (3) An assessment of the manner and extent to which— (A) state actors have provided any incentives to the Taliban, their affiliates, or other foreign terrorist organizations for attacks against United States, coalition, or Afghan security forces or civilians in Afghanistan in the last 2 years, including the details of any attacks believed to have been connected with such incentives; (B) the Taliban has publicly renounced al-Qaeda; (C) the Taliban has made any efforts to break with al-Qaeda since February 29, 2020, and a description of these efforts; (D) any senior al-Qaeda leaders, including Ayman al-Zawahiri, or any leaders of al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent, have been present in Afghanistan since February 29, 2020, and if so, the names of the leaders, the dates they were present in Afghanistan, and their other locations since February 29, 2020; (E) any members of al-Qaeda, al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent, al-Qaeda-affiliated groups, or any covered terrorist organization have, since February 29, 2020— (i) fought alongside, trained alongside, otherwise operated alongside, or sheltered with the Taliban in Afghanistan; (ii) conducted attacks inside Afghanistan, and, if so, the dates and locations of such attacks; (iii) operated training camps or related facilities inside Afghanistan, and, if so, the locations of those camps or facilities; (iv) traveled from Afghanistan to Pakistan or Iran, or from Pakistan or Iran to Afghanistan; (v) continued to have ties to any Taliban leaders or members located in Pakistan; or (vi) continued to work with the Haqqani Network; (F) any of the prisoners released by the Government of Afghanistan as a result of the February 29, 2020, agreement between the United States and Taliban— (i) are members of, or have ties to, any covered terrorist organizations or any other organization designated by the United States as a foreign terrorist organization pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1189 (ii) are suspected of taking part in attacks against American service members or civilians or attacks that caused American casualties and, if so, the names of the prisoners, the date and location of such attacks, and the number of American casualties attributed to such attacks; (G) any of the prisoners the Taliban has requested for release, but who have not yet been released as of the date of the enactment of this Act, are members of, or have ties to, any covered terrorist organizations or any other organization designated by the United States as a foreign terrorist organization pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1189 (H) senior Taliban leaders, including members of the Haqqani Network, who are located in Pakistan continue to exercise control over the insurgency in Afghanistan. (4) The number of attacks that the Taliban has carried out in Afghanistan since February 29, 2020, including the location and date of each attack as well as casualties related to each attack. (d) Form The report described in subsection (c) (e) Waiver The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation under subsection (b) (1) determines that the waiver is— (A) necessary due to an imminent and extraordinary threat to members of the United States Armed Forces in the Afghanistan; or (B) vital to the national security interests of the United States; and (2) submits to the appropriate congressional committees a detailed, written justification for such waiver, not later than 10 days after the effective date of the waiver; and (3) in the case of a determination described in paragraph (1)(A), includes in such justification each of the following: (A) A detailed description of the change in threat assessment leading to the determination. (B) An explanation for the reasons for which existing force protection mechanisms were not sufficient to reasonably ensure the safety of members of the Armed Forces. (C) The steps that have been taken to ensure that United States equipment does not fall into enemy hands. (D) A description of the coordination with allied countries of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and with other allies and partners with respect to the withdrawal. (E) A description of the coordination with the Department of State to ensure the safety of American citizens in Afghanistan in light of and subsequent to the withdrawal. (f) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate congressional committees The term appropriate congressional committees (A) the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; (B) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (C) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. (2) Covered official The term covered official (A) the Secretary of State; (B) the Director of National Intelligence; (C) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; (D) the Commander of United States Central Command; (E) the Commander of United States Forces, Afghanistan; and (F) the United States Permanent Representative to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. (3) Covered terrorist organization The term covered terrorist organization (A) al-Qaeda and affiliates, including al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent. (B) The Islamic State and affiliates. (C) Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan. (D) The Haqqani Network. (E) Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan. (F) Eastern Turkistan Islamic Movement. (G) Ansralluh. (H) Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (including under the alias Jamaat-ud-Dawa). (I) Jaish-e-Mohammed. (J) Harakat ul-Jihad-Islami. (K) Harakat ul-Mujahidin. (L) Jaysh al-Adl. (M) Lashkar-i-Jhangvi. (N) Mullah Nasir Group. (O) Hafiz Gul Bahadar Group. (P) Lashkar-i-Islam. (Q) Islamic Jihad Union Group. (R) Jamaat-ud-Dawa al Quran. (S) Ansarul Islam. 1214. Report on Operation Freedom Sentinel (a) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and as part of the materials relating to Operation Freedom Sentinel submitted to Congress by the Secretary of Defense in support of the budget of the President for the following two fiscal years, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate a report on Operation Freedom Sentinel. (b) Matters to be included The report required by subsection (a) shall include a list and description of activities, exercises, and funding amounts carried out under the operation, including— (1) specific direct war costs; (2) activities that occur in Afghanistan; (3) activities that occur outside of Afghanistan, including training and costs relating to personnel; (4) activities that provide funding to any of the services that is part of the operation’s budget request; and (5) activities related to transportation, logistics, and other support. C Matters relating to Syria, Iraq, and Iran 1221. Extension and modification of authority to provide assistance to counter the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (a) In general Subsection (a) of section 1236 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck Public Law 113–291 December 31, 2020 December 31, 2021 (b) Funding Subsection (g) of such section is amended— (1) by striking fiscal year 2020 fiscal year 2021 (2) by striking $645,000,000 $500,000,000 (c) Waiver authority; scope Subsection (j)(3) of such section is amended— (1) by striking congressional defense committees appropriate congressional committees (2) by adding at the end the following: (C) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this paragraph, the term appropriate congressional committees (i) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and (ii) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate. . (d) Annual report Such section is amended by adding at the end the following: (o) Annual report Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this subsection, and annually thereafter for two years, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate a report that includes— (1) a detailed description of the weapons and equipment purchased using the Counter-ISIS Train and Equip Fund in the previous fiscal year; and (2) a detailed description of the incremental costs for operations and maintenance for Operation Inherent Resolve in the previous fiscal year. . (e) Budget display submission (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall include in the budget materials submitted by the Secretary in support of the budget of the President (as submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code) for each of fiscal years 2022 and 2023 a detailed budget display for funds requested for the Department of Defense for such fiscal year for Operation Inherent Resolve. (2) Matters to be included The detailed budget display required under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) With respect to procurement accounts— (i) amounts displayed by account, budget activity, line number, line item, and line item title; and (ii) a description of the requirements for each such amount. (B) With respect to research, development, test, and evaluation accounts— (i) amounts displayed by account, budget activity, line number, program element, and program element title; and (ii) a description of the requirements for each such amount. (C) With respect to operation and maintenance accounts— (i) amounts displayed by account title, budget activity title, line number, and subactivity group title; and (ii) a description of the specific manner in which each such amount would be used. (D) With respect to military personnel accounts— (i) amounts displayed by account, budget activity, budget subactivity, and budget subactivity title; and (ii) a description of the requirements for each such amount. (E) With respect to each project under military construction accounts (including with respect to unspecified minor military construction and amounts for planning and design), the country, location, project title, and project amount for each fiscal year. 1222. Extension of authority to provide assistance to the vetted Syrian opposition (a) In general Subsection (a) of section 1209 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck Public Law 113–291 December 31, 2020 December 31, 2021 (b) Notice before provision of assistance Subsection (b)(2)(A) of such section is amended by striking fiscal year 2019 or fiscal year 2020 fiscal year 2019, fiscal year 2020, or fiscal year 2021 (c) Certification Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall certify to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate that no United States military forces are being used or have been used for the extraction, transport, transfer, or sale of oil from Syria. 1223. Extension of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq Section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ( 10 U.S.C. 113 (1) in subsections (c) and (d), by striking fiscal year 2020 each of fiscal years 2020 and 2021 (2) in subsection (h), by striking Of the amount made available for fiscal year 2020 to carry out section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, not more than $20,000,000 Of the amounts made available for fiscal years 2020 and 2021 to carry out this section, not more than $20,000,000 for each such fiscal year 1224. Prohibition on provision of weapons and other forms of support to certain organizations None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2021 may be used to knowingly provide weapons or any other form of support to Al Qaeda, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), Jabhat Fateh al Sham, Hamas, Hizballah, Palestine Islamic Jihad, al-Shabaab, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, or any individual or group affiliated with any such organization. 1225. Consolidated budget display and report on Operation Spartan Shield (a) Budget display submission (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall include in the budget materials submitted by the Secretary in support of the budget of the President (as submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code) for each of fiscal years 2022 and 2023 a detailed budget display for funds requested for the Department of Defense for such fiscal year for Operation Spartan Shield and Iran deterrence-related programs and activities of the Department of Defense in the United States Central Command area of operation. (2) Matters to be included The detailed budget display required under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) With respect to procurement accounts— (i) amounts displayed by account, budget activity, line number, line item, and line item title; and (ii) a description of the requirements for each such amount. (B) With respect to research, development, test, and evaluation accounts— (i) amounts displayed by account, budget activity, line number, program element, and program element title; and (ii) a description of the requirements for each such amount. (C) With respect to operation and maintenance accounts— (i) amounts displayed by account title, budget activity title, line number, and subactivity group title; and (ii) a description of the specific manner in which each such amount would be used. (D) With respect to military personnel accounts— (i) amounts displayed by account, budget activity, budget subactivity, and budget subactivity title; and (ii) a description of the requirements for each such amount. (E) With respect to each project under military construction accounts (including with respect to unspecified minor military construction and amounts for planning and design), the country, location, project title, and project amount for each fiscal year. (b) Report (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter in conjunction with the submission of the budget of President (as submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code) for each of fiscal years 2022 and 2023, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate a report on Operation Spartan Shield. (2) Matters to be included The report required by paragraph (1) should include— (A) (i) for the first report, a history of the operation and its objectives; and (ii) for each subsequent report, a description of the operation and its objectives during the prior year; (B) a list and description of significant activities and exercises carried out under the operation during the prior year; (C) a description of the purpose and goals of such activities and exercises and an assessment of the degree to which stated goals were achieved during the prior year; (D) a description of criteria used to judge the effectiveness of joint exercises to build partner capacity under the operation during the prior year; (E) an identification of incremental and estimated total costs of the operation during the prior year, including a separate identification of incremental costs of increased force presence in the United States Central Command area of responsibility to counter Iran since May 2019; and (F) any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate. (3) Form The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex. 1226. Sense of Congress on Peshmerga forces as a partner in Operation Inherent Resolve It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the Peshmerga of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq have made, and continue to make, significant contributions to the security of Northern Iraq, by defending nearly 650 miles of critical terrain, to degrade, dismantle, and ultimately defeat the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) in Iraq as a partner in Operation Inherent Resolve; (2) although ISIS has been severely degraded, their ideology and combatants still linger and pose a threat of resurgence if regional security is not sustained; (3) a strong Peshmerga and Kurdistan Regional Government is critical to maintaining a stable and tolerant Iraq in which all faiths, sects, and ethnicities are afforded equal protection under the law and full integration into the Government and society of Iraq; (4) continued security assistance, as appropriate, to the Ministry of Peshmerga Affairs of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq in support of counter-ISIS operations, in coordination with the Government of Iraq, is critical to United States national security interests; and (5) continued United States support to the Peshmerga, coupled with security sector reform in the region, will enable them to more effectively partner with other elements of the Iraqi Security Forces, the United States, and other coalition members to consolidate gains, hold territory, and protect infrastructure from ISIS and its affiliates in an effort to deal a lasting defeat to ISIS and prevent its reemergence in Iraq. D Matters relating to Russia 1231. Prohibition on availability of funds relating to sovereignty of the Russian Federation over Crimea (a) Prohibition None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to implement any activity that recognizes the sovereignty of the Russian Federation over Crimea. (b) Waiver The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may waive the restriction on the obligation or expenditure of funds required by subsection (a) if the Secretary of Defense— (1) determines that to do so is in the national security interest of the United States; and (2) submits a notification of the waiver, at the time the waiver is invoked, to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate. 1232. Extension of limitation on military cooperation between the United States and the Russian Federation Section 1232(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 , 2019, or 2020 2019, 2020, or 2021 1233. Modification and extension of Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (a) In general Section 1250 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( Public Law 114–92 (1) in subsection (c)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking 50 percent of the funds available for fiscal year 2020 pursuant to subsection (f)(5) 50 percent of the funds available for fiscal year 2021 pursuant to subsection (f)(6) (B) in paragraph (3), by striking fiscal year 2020 fiscal year 2021 (C) in paragraph (5), by striking Of the funds available for fiscal year 2020 pursuant to subsection (f)(5) Of the funds available for fiscal year 2021 pursuant to subsection (f)(6) (2) in subsection (f), by adding at the end the following: (6) For fiscal year 2021, $250,000,000. ; and (3) in subsection (h), by striking December 31, 2022 December 31, 2023 (b) Extension of reports on military assistance to Ukraine Section 1275(e) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck Public Law 113–291 January 31, 2021 December 31, 2023 1234. United States participation in the Open Skies Treaty (a) Notification required (1) In general Upon withdrawal of the United States from the Open Skies Treaty pursuant to Article XV of the Treaty, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees— (A) a notification that the United States has concluded agreements with other state parties to the Treaty that host United States military forces and assets to ensure that after such withdrawal the United States will be provided sufficient notice by such state parties of requests for observation flights over the territories of such state parties under the Treaty; or (B) if the United States has not concluded the agreements described in subparagraph (A), a description of how the United States will consistently and reliably be provided with sufficient warning of observation flights described in subparagraph (A) by other means, including a description of assets and personnel and policy implications of using such other means. (2) Submission of agreements Upon withdrawal of the United States from the Open Skies Treaty pursuant to Article XV of the Treaty, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees copies of the agreements described in paragraph (1)(A). (b) Report (1) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence and the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the effects of a potential withdrawal of the United States from the Open Skies Treaty. (2) Matters to be included The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A description of how the United States will replace benefits of cooperation with United States allies under the Treaty. (B) A description of— (i) how the United States will obtain unclassified, publicly-releasable imagery it currently receives under the Treaty; (ii) if national technical means are used as a replacement to obtain such imagery— (I) how the requirements satisfied by collection under the Treaty will be prioritized within the National Intelligence Priorities Framework; (II) a plan to mitigate any gaps in collection; and (III) requirements and timelines for declassification of data for public release; and (iii) if commercial imagery is used as a replacement to obtain such imagery— (I) contractual actions and associated timelines needed to purchase such imagery; (II) costs to purchase commercial imagery equivalent to that which is obtained under the Treaty; and (III) estimates of costs to share that data with other state parties to the Treaty that are United States partners. (C) A description of how the United States will replace intelligence information, other than imagery, obtained under the Treaty. (D) A description of how the United States will ensure continued dialogue with Russia in a manner similar to formal communications as confidence-building measures to reinforce strategic stability required under the Treaty. (E) All unedited responses to the questionnaire provided to United States allies by the United States in 2019 and all official statements provided to the United States by United States allies in 2019 or 2020 relating to United States withdrawal from the Treaty. (F) An assessment of the impact of such withdrawal on— (i) United States leadership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO); and (ii) cohesion and cooperation among NATO member states. (G) A description of options to continue confidence-building measures under the Treaty with other state parties to the Treaty that are United States allies. (H) An assessment of the Defense Intelligence Agency of the impact on national security of such withdrawal. (I) An assessment of how the United States will influence decisions regarding certifications of new sensors, primarily synthetic aperture radar sensors, under the Treaty that could pose additional risk to deployed United States military forces and assets. (3) Form The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may contain a classified annex. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate congressional committees The term appropriate congressional committees (A) the congressional defense committees; (B) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives; and (C) the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. (2) Observation flight The term observation flight (3) Open Skies Treaty; Treaty The term Open Skies Treaty Treaty E Matters relating to Europe and NATO 1241. Limitations on use of funds to reduce the total number of members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty who are stationed in Germany, to reduce the total number of members of the Armed Forces stationed in Europe, and to divest military infrastructure in Europe (a) Limitation on use of funds to reduce the total number of members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty who are stationed in Germany None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2021, to take any action to reduce the total number of members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty who are stationed in Germany below the levels present on June 10, 2020, until 180 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff have separately submitted to the congressional defense committees the following: (1) A certification that— (A) such a reduction is in the national security interest of the United States and will not significantly undermine the security of the United States or its allies in the region, including a justification explaining the analysis behind the certification; and (B) the Secretary has appropriately consulted with United States allies and partners in Europe, including all members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), regarding such a reduction. (2) A detailed analysis of the impact such a reduction would have on the security of United States allies and partners in Europe and on interoperability and joint activities with such allies and partners, including major military exercises. (3) A detailed analysis of the impact such a reduction would have on the ability to deter Russian aggression and ensure the territorial integrity of United States allies and partners in Europe. (4) A detailed analysis of the impact such a reduction would have on the ability to counter Russian malign activity. (5) A detailed analysis of where the members of the Armed Forces will be moved and stationed as a consequence of such a reduction. (6) A detailed plan for how such a reduction would be implemented. (7) A detailed analysis of the cost implications of such a reduction, to include the cost associated with new facilities to be constructed at the location to which the members of the Armed Forces are to be moved and stationed. (8) A detailed analysis of the impact such a reduction would have on United States service members and their families stationed in Europe. (9) A detailed analysis of the impact such a reduction would have on Joint Force Planning. (10) A detailed explanation of the impact such a reduction would have on implementation of the National Defense Strategy and a certification that the reduction would not negatively affect implementation of the National Defense Strategy. (b) Limitation on use of funds to reduce the total number of members of the Armed Forces stationed in Europe None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2021, to reduce the total number of members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty who are stationed in Europe below the levels present on June 10, 2020, until 180 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff have separately submitted to the congressional defense committees the following: (1) A certification that— (A) such a reduction is in the national security interest of the United States and will not significantly undermine the security of the United States or its allies in the region, including a justification explaining the analysis behind the certification. (B) the Secretary has appropriately consulted with United States allies and partners in Europe, including all members of NATO, regarding such a reduction. (2) A detailed analysis of the impact such a reduction would have on the security of United States allies and partners in Europe and on interoperability and joint activities with such allies and partners, including major military exercises. (3) A detailed analysis of the impact such a reduction would have on the ability to deter Russian aggression and ensure the territorial integrity of United States allies and partners in Europe. (4) A detailed analysis of the impact such a reduction would have on the ability to counter Russian malign activity. (5) A detailed analysis of where the forces will be moved and stationed as a consequence of such a reduction. (6) A detailed plan for how such a reduction would be implemented. (7) A detailed analysis of the cost implications of such a reduction, to include the cost associated with new facilities to be constructed at the location to which the members of the Armed Forces are to be moved and stationed. (8) A detailed analysis of the impact such a reduction would have on service members and their families stationed in Europe. (9) A detailed analysis of the impact such a reduction would have on Joint Force Planning. (10) A detailed explanation of the impact such a reduction would have on implementation of the National Defense Strategy and a certification that the reduction would not negatively affect implementation of the National Defense Strategy. (c) Limitation to divest military infrastructure in Europe (1) In general The Secretary of Defense may not take any action to divest any infrastructure or real property in Europe under the operational control of the Department of Defense unless, prior to taking such action, the Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees that no military requirement for future use of the infrastructure or real property is foreseeable. (2) Sunset This subsection shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 1242. Sense of Congress on support for coordinated action to ensure the security of Baltic allies It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the continued security of the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania is critical to achieving United States national security interests and defense objectives against the acute and formidable threat posed by Russia; (2) the United States and the Baltic states are leaders in the mission of defending independence and democracy from aggression and in promoting stability and security within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), with non-NATO partners, and with other international organizations such as the European Union; (3) the Baltic states are model NATO allies in terms of burden sharing and capital investment in materiel critical to United States and allied security, investment of over 2 percent of their gross domestic product on defense expenditure, allocating over 20 percent of their defense budgets on capital modernization, matching security assistance from the United States, frequently deploying their forces around the world in support of allied and United States objectives, and sharing diplomatic, technical, military, and analytical expertise on defense and security matters; (4) the United States should continue to strengthen bilateral and multilateral defense by, with, and through allied nations, particularly those which possess expertise and dexterity but do not enjoy the benefits of national economies of scale; (5) the United States should pursue consistent efforts focused on defense and security assistance, coordination, and planning designed to ensure the continued security of the Baltic states and on deterring current and future challenges to the national sovereignty of United States allies and partners in the Baltic region; and (6) such an initiative should include an innovative and comprehensive conflict deterrence strategy for the Baltic region encompassing the unique geography of the Baltic states, modern and diffuse threats to their land, sea, and air spaces, and necessary improvements to their defense posture, including command-and-control infrastructure, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities, communications equipment and networks, and special forces. 1243. Sense of Congress on support for Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) The Baltic countries of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania are highly valued allies of the United States, and they have repeatedly demonstrated their commitment to advancing our mutual interests as well as those of the NATO Alliance. (2) Operation Atlantic Resolve is a series of exercises and coordinating efforts demonstrating the United States’ commitment to its European partners and allies, including the Baltic countries of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, with the shared goal of peace and stability in the region. Operation Atlantic Resolve strengthens communication and understanding, and is an important effort to deter Russian aggression in the region. (3) Through Operation Atlantic Resolve, the European Deterrence Initiative undertakes exercises, training, and rotational presence necessary to reassure and integrate our allies, including the Baltic countries, into a common defense framework. (4) All three Baltic countries contributed to the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan, sending troops and operating with few caveats. The Baltic countries continue to commit resources and troops to the Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan. (b) Sense of Congress Congress— (1) reaffirms its support for the principle of collective defense in Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty for our NATO allies, including Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania; (2) supports the sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity, and inviolability of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania as well as their internationally recognized borders, and expresses concerns over increasingly aggressive military maneuvering by the Russian Federation near their borders and airspace; (3) expresses concern over and condemns subversive and destabilizing activities by the Russian Federation within the Baltic countries; and (4) encourages the Administration to further enhance defense cooperation efforts with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania and supports the efforts of their Governments to provide for the defense of their people and sovereign territory. 1244. Sense of Congress on support for Georgia (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Georgia is a valued friend of the United States and has repeatedly demonstrated its commitment to advancing the mutual interests of both countries, including the deployment of Georgian forces as part of the former International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and the current Resolute Support Mission led by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in Afghanistan and the Multi-National Force in Iraq. (2) The European Deterrence Initiative builds the partnership capacity of Georgia so it can work more closely with the United States and NATO, as well as provide for its own defense. (3) In addition to the European Deterrence Initiative, Georgia’s participation in the NATO initiative Partnership for Peace is paramount to interoperability with the United States and NATO, and establishing a more peaceful environment in the region. (4) Despite the losses suffered, as a NATO partner, Georgia is committed to the Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan with the fifth-largest contingent on the ground. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that the United States should— (1) reaffirm support for an enduring strategic partnership between the United States and Georgia; (2) support Georgia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally-recognized borders, and does not recognize the independence of the Abkhazia and South Ossetia regions currently occupied by the Russian Federation; (3) continue support for multi-domain security assistance for Georgia in the form of lethal and non-lethal measures to build resiliency, bolster deterrence against Russian aggression, and promote stability in the region, by— (A) strengthening defensive capabilities and promote readiness; and (B) improving interoperability with NATO forces; and (4) further enhance security cooperation and engagement with Georgia and other Black Sea regional partners. 1245. Sense of Congress on burden sharing by partners and allies (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) The United States’ alliances and other critical defense partnerships are a cornerstone of Department of Defense (DOD) efforts to deter aggression from our adversaries, counter violent extremism, and preserve United States national security interests in the face of challenges to those interests by Russia, China and other actors. (2) The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is the most successful military alliance in history, having deterred war between major state powers for more than 70 years. (3) Collective security and the responsibility of each member of the security of the other members as well as the alliance as a whole is a pillar of the NATO alliance. (4) NATO members other than the United States collectively expend over $300,000,000,000 in defense investments annually and maintain military forces totaling an estimated 1,900,000 service members, bolstering the alliance’s collective capacity to counter shared threats. (5) At the NATO Wales Summit in 2014, NATO members pledged to strive to increase their own defense spending to 2 percent of their respective gross domestic products and to spend at least 20 percent of their defense budgets on equipment by 2024 as part of their burden sharing commitments. (6) Since 2014, there has been a steady increase in allied defense spending, with 22 member countries meeting defense spending targets in 2018 and having submitted plans to meet the targets by 2024. (7) In addition to individual defense spending contributions, NATO allies and partners also contribute to NATO and United States operations around the world, including the Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan and the Global Coalition to Defeat the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS). (8) South Korea hosts a baseline of 28,500 United States forces including the Eighth Army and Seventh Air Force. (9) South Korea maintains Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense and Patriot Batteries that contribute to regional Ballistic Missile Defense, is a participant in the Enforcement Coordination Center, and is a significant contributor to United Nations peacekeeping operations. (10) South Korea is an active consumer of United States Foreign Military Sales (FMS) with approximately $30,500,000,000 in active FMS cases and makes significant financial contributions to support forward deployed United States forces in South Korea, including contributions of $924,000,000 under the Special Measures Agreement in 2019 and over 90 percent of the cost of developing Camp Humphreys. (11) Japan hosts 54,000 United States forces including the Seventh Fleet, the only forward-deployed United States aircraft carrier, and the United States Marine Corps’ III Marine Expeditionary Force. (12) Japan maintains Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense and Patriot Batteries that contribute to regional Ballistic Missile Defense, conducts bilateral presence operations and mutual asset protection missions with United States forces, and is a capacity building contributor to United Nations peacekeeping operations. (13) Japan is an active consumer of United States FMS with approximately $28,400,000,000 in active FMS cases and makes significant financial contributions to enable optimized United States military posture, including contributions of approximately $2,000,000,000 annually under the Special Measures Agreement, $187,000,000 annually under the Japan Facilities Improvement Program, $12,100,000,000 for the Futenma Replacement Facility, $4,800,000,000 for Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni, and $3,100,000,000 for construction on Guam to support the movement of United States Marines from Okinawa. (b) Sense of congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the United States Government should focus on United States national security requirements for investment in forward presence, joint exercises, investments, and commitments that contribute to the security of the United States and collective security, and cease efforts that solely focus on the financial contributions of United States allies and partners when negotiating joint security arrangements; (2) the United States must continue to strengthen its alliances and security partnerships with like-minded democracies around the world to deter aggression from authoritarian competitors and promote peace and respect for democratic values and human rights around the world; (3) United States partners and allies should continue to increase their military capacity and enhance their ability to contribute to global peace and security; (4) NATO allies should continue working toward their 2014 Wales Defense Investment Pledge commitments; (5) the United States should maintain forward-deployed United States forces in order to better ensure United States national security and global stability; and (6) alliances and partnerships are the cornerstone of United States national security and critical to countering the threat posed by malign actors to the post-World War II liberal international order. 1246. Sense of Congress on NATO’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has been working with allies and partners to provide support to the civilian response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (commonly referred to as COVID-19 (2) Since the beginning of the pandemic, NATO allies and partners have completed more than 350 airlift flights, supplying hundreds of tons of critical supplies globally, have built nearly 100 field hospitals and dedicated more than half a million troops to support the civilian response to the pandemic. (3) NATO’s Euro-Atlantic Disaster Response Coordination Centre has been operating 24 hours, seven days a week to coordinate requests for supplies and resources. (4) The NATO Support and Procurement Agency’s Strategic Airlift Capability and Strategic Airlift International Solution programs have chartered flights to transport medical supplies between partners and allies. (5) NATO established Rapid Air Mobility to speed up military air transport of medical supplies and resources to allies and partners experiencing a shortage of medical supplies and personal protective equipment. (6) In June 2020, NATO Defense Ministers agreed to future steps to prepare for a potential second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, including a new operation plan, establishing a stockpile of medical equipment and supplies, and a new fund to acquire medical supplies and services. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) NATO’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic is an excellent example of the democratic alliance’s capacity tackling overwhelming logistical challenges through close collaboration; (2) the United States should remain committed to strengthening NATO’s operational response to the pandemic; and (3) the United States should fulfill its commitments made at the 2020 NATO Defense Ministerial and continue to bolster the work of the Euro-Atlantic Disaster Response Coordination Centre, the NATO Support and Procurement Agency’s Strategic Airlift Capability and Strategic Airlift International Solution programs, and other efforts to utilize NATO’s capabilities to support the civilian pandemic response. F Matters relating to the Indo-Pacific region 1251. Indo-Pacific Reassurance Initiative (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) a stable, peaceful, and secure Indo-Pacific region is vital to United States economic and national security; (2) revisionist states, rogue states, violent extremist organizations, and natural and manmade disasters are persistent challenges to regional stability and security; (3) maintaining stability and upholding a rules-based order requires a holistic United States strategy that— (A) synchronizes all elements of national power; (B) is inclusive of United States allies and partner countries; and (C) ensures a persistent, predictable United States presence to reinforce regional defense; (4) enhancing regional defense requires robust efforts to increase capability, readiness, and responsiveness to deter and mitigate destabilizing activities; (5) the Department of Defense should pursue an integrated program of activities to— (A) reassure United States allies and partner countries in the Indo-Pacific region; (B) appropriately prioritize activities and resources to implement the National Defense Strategy; and (C) enhance the ability of Congress to provide oversight of and support to Department of Defense efforts; (6) an integrated, coherent, and strategic program of activities in the Indo-Pacific region, similar to the European Deterrence Initiative (originally the European Reassurance Initiative), will enhance United States presence and positioning, allow for additional exercises, improve infrastructure and logistics, and build allied and partner capacity to deter aggression, strengthen ally and partner interoperability, and demonstrate United States commitment to Indo-Pacific countries; (7) an integrated, coherent, and strategic program of activities in the Indo-Pacific region will also assist in resourcing budgetary priorities and enhancing transparency and oversight of programs and activities to better enable a coordinated and strategic plan for Department of Defense programs; (8) not less than $3,578,360,000 of base funding should be allocated to fully support such program of activities in fiscal year 2021; and (9) the Department of Defense should ensure adequate, consistent planning is conducted for future funding and build upon the activities identified in fiscal year 2021 in future budget requests, as appropriate. (b) Indo-Pacific Reassurance Initiative The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a program of prioritized activities to reassure United States allies and partner countries in the Indo-Pacific region that shall be known as the Indo-Pacific Reassurance Initiative Initiative (c) Objectives The objectives of the Initiative shall include reassuring United States allies and partner countries in the Indo-Pacific region by— (1) optimizing the presence of United States Armed Forces in the region; (2) strengthening and maintaining bilateral and multilateral military exercises and training with such countries; (3) improving infrastructure in the region to enhance the responsiveness of United States Armed Forces; (4) enhancing the prepositioning of equipment and materiel in the region; and (5) building the defense and security capabilities, capacity, and cooperation of such countries. (d) Plan relating to transparency for the Indo-Pacific Reassurance Initiative (1) Plan required (A) In general Not later than February 1, 2022, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Commander of the United States Indo-Pacific Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a future years plan on activities and resources of the Initiative. (B) Applicability The plan shall apply to the Initiative with respect to the first fiscal year beginning after the date of submission of the plan and at least the four succeeding fiscal years. (2) Matters to be included The plan required under paragraph (1) shall include each of the following: (A) A summary of progress made towards achieving the objectives of the Initiative. (B) An assessment of resource requirements to achieve such objectives. (C) An assessment of capabilities requirements to achieve such objectives. (D) An assessment of logistics requirements, including force enablers, equipment, supplies, storage, and maintenance requirements, to achieve such objectives. (E) An identification of the intended force structure and posture of the assigned and allocated forces within the area of responsibility of the United States Indo-Pacific Command for the last fiscal year of the plan and the manner in which such force structure and posture support such objectives. (F) An identification and assessment of required infrastructure and military construction investments to achieve such objectives, including potential infrastructure investments proposed by host countries, new construction or modernization of existing sites that would be funded by the United States, and a master plan that includes the following: (i) A list of specific locations, organized by country, in which the Commander of the United States Indo-Pacific Command anticipates requiring infrastructure investments to support an enduring or periodic military presence in the region. (ii) A list of specific infrastructure investments required at each location identified under clause (i), to include the project title and estimated cost of each project. (iii) A brief explanation for how each location identified under clause (i) and infrastructure investments identified under clause (ii) support a validated requirement or component of the overall strategy in the region. (iv) A discussion of any gaps in the current infrastructure authorities that would preclude implementation of the infrastructure investments identified under clause (ii). (v) A description of the type and size of military force elements that would maintain an enduring presence or operate periodically from each location identified under clause (i). (vi) A summary of kinetic and non-kinetic vulnerabilities for current locations and each location identified in clause (i), to include— (I) the level of risk associated with each vulnerability; and (II) the proposed mitigations and projected costs to address each such vulnerability, to include— (aa) hardening and other resilience measures; (bb) active and passive counter-Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance; (cc) active and passive counter Positioning, Navigation, and Timing; (dd) air and missile defense capabilities; (ee) enhanced logistics and sea lines of communication security; and (ff) other issues identified by the Commander of the United States Indo-Pacific Command. (G) An assessment of logistics requirements, including force enablers, equipment, supplies, storage, fuel storage and distribution, and maintenance requirements, to achieve such objectives. (H) An analysis of the challenges to the ability of the United States to deploy significant forces from the continental United States to the Indo-Pacific theater in the event of a major contingency, and a description of the plans of the Department of Defense, including military exercises, to address such challenges. (I) An assessment and plan for security cooperation investments to enhance such objectives. (J) A plan to resource United States force posture and capabilities, including— (i) the infrastructure capacity of existing locations and their ability to accommodate additional United States forces in the Indo-Pacific region; (ii) the potential new locations for additional United States Armed Forces in the Indo-Pacific region, including an assessment of infrastructure and military construction resources necessary to accommodate such forces; (iii) a detailed timeline to achieve desired posture requirements; (iv) a detailed assessment of the resources necessary to achieve the requirements of the plan, including specific cost estimates for each project under the Initiative to support optimized presence, exercises and training, enhanced prepositioning, improved infrastructure, and building partnership capacity; and (v) a detailed timeline to achieve the force posture and capabilities, including force requirements. (K) A detailed explanation of any significant modifications of the requirements or resources, as compared to plans previously submitted under paragraph (1). (L) Any other matters the Secretary of Defense determines should be included. (3) Form The plan required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (e) Budget submission information For fiscal year 2022 and each fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall include in the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Defense budget for that fiscal year (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code)— (1) the amounts, by budget function and as a separate item, requested for the Department of Defense for such fiscal year for all programs and activities under the Initiative; and (2) a detailed budget display for the Initiative, including— (A) with respect to procurement accounts— (i) amounts displayed by account, budget activity, line number, line item, and line item title; and (ii) a description of the requirements for each such amounts; (B) with respect to research, development, test, and evaluation accounts— (i) amounts displayed by account, budget activity, line number, program element, and program element title; and (ii) a description of the requirements for each such amount; (C) with respect to operation and maintenance accounts— (i) amounts displayed by account title, budget activity title, line number, and subactivity group title; and (ii) a description of how such amounts will specifically be used; (D) with respect to military personnel accounts— (i) amounts displayed by account, budget activity, budget subactivity, and budget subactivity title; and (ii) a description of the requirements for each such amount; and (E) with respect to each project under military construction accounts (including with respect to unspecified minor military construction and amounts for planning and design), the country, location, project title, and project amount for each fiscal year. (f) End of fiscal year report Not later than November 20, 2022, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that contains— (1) a detailed summary of funds obligated for the Initiative during the preceding fiscal year; and (2) a detailed comparison of funds obligated for the Initiative during the preceding fiscal year to the amount of funds requested for the Initiative for such fiscal year in the materials submitted to Congress by the Secretary in support of the budget of the President for that fiscal year as required by subsection (e), including with respect to each of the accounts described in subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), (D), and (E) of subsection (e)(2) and the information required under each such subparagraph. (g) Briefings required Not later than March 1, 2023, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the status of all matters covered by the report required by section (f). (h) Relationship to budget Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code. (i) Conforming repeal Section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 1252. Limitation on use of funds to reduce the total number of members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty who are deployed to South Korea None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be used to reduce the total number of members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty who are deployed to South Korea below 28,500 until 180 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees the following: (1) Such a reduction is in the national security interest of the United States and will not significantly undermine the security of United States allies in the region. (2) Such a reduction is commensurate with a reduction in the threat posed to the United States and its allies in the region by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. (3) Following such a reduction, the Republic of Korea would be capable of deterring a conflict on the Korean Peninsula. (4) The Secretary has appropriately consulted with allies of the United States, including South Korea and Japan, regarding such a reduction. 1253. Implementation of GAO recommendations on preparedness of United States forces to counter North Korean chemical and biological weapons (a) Plan required (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan to address the recommendations in the U.S. Government Accountability Office’s report entitled Preparedness of U.S. Forces to Counter North Korean Chemical and Biological Weapons (2) Elements The plan required under paragraph (1) shall, with respect to each recommendation in the report described in paragraph (1) that the Secretary of Defense has implemented or intends to implement, include— (A) a summary of actions that have been or will be taken to implement the recommendation; and (B) a schedule, with specific milestones, for completing implementation of the recommendation. (b) Submittal to Congress Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the plan required under subsection (a). (c) Deadline for implementation (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (2), not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall carry out activities to implement the plan developed under subsection (a). (2) Exception for implementation of certain recommendations (A) Delayed implementation The Secretary of Defense may initiate implementation of a recommendation in the report described in subsection (a)(1) after the date specified in paragraph (1) if the Secretary provides the congressional defense committees with a specific justification for the delay in implementation of such recommendation on or before such date. (B) Nonimplementation The Secretary of Defense may decide not to implement a recommendation in the report described in subsection (a)(1) if the Secretary provides to the congressional defense committees, on or before the date specified in paragraph (1)— (i) a specific justification for the decision not to implement the recommendation; and (ii) a summary of alternative actions the Secretary plans to take to address the conditions underlying the recommendation. 1254. Public reporting of Chinese military companies operating in the United States (a) Determination of operations Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and on an ongoing basis thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall identify each entity the Secretary determines, based on the most recent information available, is— (1) (A) directly or indirectly owned, controlled, or beneficially owned by, or in an official or unofficial capacity acting as an agent of or on behalf of, the People’s Liberation Army or any of its affiliates; or (B) identified as a military-civil fusion contributor to the Chinese defense industrial base; (2) engaged in providing commercial services, manufacturing, producing, or exporting; and (3) operating directly or indirectly in the United States, including any of its territories and possessions. (b) Submission; publication (1) Submission Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 2 years thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate an updated list of each entity determined to be a Chinese military company pursuant to subsection (a), in classified and unclassified forms. (2) Publication Concurrent with the submission of a list under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall publish the unclassified portion of such list in the Federal Register. (c) Consultation The Secretary may consult with the head of any appropriate Federal department or agency in making the determinations required under subsection (a) and shall transmit a copy of each list submitted under subsection (b)(1) to the heads of each appropriate Federal department and agency. (d) Definitions (1) Military-civil fusion contributor In this section, the term military-civil fusion contributor (A) entities receiving assistance from the Government of China through science and technology efforts initiated under the Chinese military industrial planning apparatus; (B) entities affiliated with the Chinese Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, including entities connected through Ministry schools, research partnerships, and state-aided science and technology projects; (C) entities receiving assistance from the Government of China or operational direction or policy guidance from the State Administration for Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense; (D) entities recognized and awarded with receipt of an innovation prize for science and technology by such State Administration; (E) any other entity or subsidiary defined as a defense enterprise (F) entities residing in or affiliated with a military-civil fusion enterprise zone or receiving assistance from the Government of China through such enterprise zone. (2) People’s Liberation Army The term People’s Liberation Army 1255. Independent study on the defense industrial base of the People’s Republic of China (a) In general Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct a study on the defense industrial base of the People’s Republic of China. (b) Elements of study The study required under subsection (a) shall assess the resiliency and capacity of China’s defense industrial base to support its objectives in competition and conflict, including with respect to the following: (1) The manufacturing capacity and physical plant capacity of the defense industrial base, including its ability to modernize to meet future needs. (2) Gaps in national-security-related domestic manufacturing capabilities, including non-existent, extinct, threatened, and single-point-of-failure capabilities. (3) Supply chains with single points of failure or limited resiliency, especially suppliers at third-tier and lower. (4) Energy consumption and vulnerabilities. (5) Domestic education and manufacturing workforce skills. (6) Exclusive or dominant supply of military and civilian materiel, raw materials, or other goods (or components thereof) essential to China’s national security by the United States or United States allies and partners. (7) The ability to meet the likely repair and new construction demands of the People’s Liberation Army in the event of a protracted conflict. (8) The availability of substitutes or alternative sources for goods identified pursuant to paragraph (6). (9) Recommendations for legislative, regulatory, and policy changes and other actions by the President and the heads of Federal agencies as appropriate based upon a reasoned assessment that the benefits outweigh the costs (broadly defined to include any economic, strategic, and national security benefits or costs) over the short, medium, and long-term to erode, in the event of a conflict, the ability of China’s defense industrial base to support the national objectives of China. (c) Submission to Department of Defense Not later than 210 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the federally funded research and development center shall submit to the Secretary a report containing the study conducted under subsection (a). (d) Submission to Congress Not later than 240 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the report submitted to the Secretary under subsection (c), without change but with any comments of the Secretary with respect to the report. 1256. Report on China’s One Belt, One Road Initiative in Africa (a) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the military and defense implications of China’s One Belt, One Road Initiative in Africa and a strategy to address impacts on United States military and defense interests in Africa. (b) Matters to be included The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An assessment of Chinese dual-use investments in Africa, including a description of which investments that are of greatest concern to United States military or defense interests. (2) A description of such investments that are associated with People’s Liberation Army cooperation with African countries. (3) An assessment of the potential military, intelligence, and logistical threats facing United States’ key regional military infrastructure, supply chains, and staging grounds due to such investments. (4) An identification of Department of Defense measures taken to mitigate the risk posed to United States forces and defense interests by such investments. (5) A strategy to address ongoing military and defense implications posed by the expansion of such investments. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate congressional committees The term appropriate congressional committees (A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. (2) Chinese dual-use investments in Africa The term Chinese dual-use investments in Africa (d) Form The report required by subsection (a) shall— (1) be submitted in unclassified form but may contain a classified annex; and (2) be made available to the public on the website of the Department of Defense. 1257. Sense of Congress on enhancement of the United States-Taiwan defense relationship It is the sense of Congress that— (1) Taiwan is a vital partner of the United States and is critical to a free and open Indo-Pacific region; (2) the Taiwan Relations Act ( 22 U.S.C. 3301 Six Assurances (3) the United States should continue to strengthen defense and security cooperation with Taiwan to support the development of capable, ready, and modern defense forces necessary for Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability; (4) consistent with the Taiwan Relations Act, the United States should strongly support the acquisition by Taiwan of defense articles and services through foreign military sales, direct commercial sales, and industrial cooperation, with an emphasis on anti-ship, coastal defense, anti-armor, air defense, defensive naval mining, and resilient command and control capabilities that support the asymmetric defense strategy of Taiwan; (5) the President and Congress should determine the nature and quantity of such defense articles and services based solely upon their judgment of the needs of Taiwan, as required by the Taiwan Relations Act and in accordance with procedures established by law; (6) the United States should continue efforts to improve the predictability of United States arms sales to Taiwan by ensuring timely review of and response to requests of Taiwan for defense articles and services; (7) the Secretary of Defense should promote policies concerning exchanges that enhance the security of Taiwan, including— (A) opportunities with Taiwan for practical training and military exercises that— (i) enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability, as described in section 3(a) of the Taiwan Relations Act ( 22 U.S.C. 3302(a) (ii) emphasize capabilities consistent with the asymmetric defense strategy of Taiwan; (B) exchanges between senior defense officials and general officers of the United States and Taiwan, consistent with the Taiwan Travel Act ( Public Law 115–135 (C) opportunities for exchanges between junior officers and senior enlisted personnel of the United States and Taiwan; (8) the Secretary of Defense should consider expanded air and naval engagements and training with Taiwan to enhance regional security; (9) the United States and Taiwan should expand cooperation in humanitarian assistance and disaster relief including conducting port calls in Taiwan with the United States Naval Ship Comfort and United States Naval Ship Mercy; (10) the Secretary of Defense should consider options, including exercising ship visits and port calls, as appropriate, to expand the scale and scope of humanitarian assistance and disaster response cooperation with Taiwan and other regional partners so as to improve disaster response planning and preparedness; (11) the Secretary of Defense should continue regular transits of United States Navy vessels through the Taiwan Strait and encourage allies and partners to follow suit in conducting such transits to demonstrate the commitment of the United States and its allies and partners to fly, sail, and operate anywhere international law allows; (12) the violation of international law by the Government of China with respect to the Joint Declaration of the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on the Question of Hong Kong, done at Beijing December 19, 1984, is gravely concerning and erodes international confidence in China’s willingness to honor its international commitments, including not to change the status quo with respect to Taiwan by force; (13) the increasingly coercive and aggressive behavior of China towards Taiwan, including growing military maneuvers targeting Taiwan, is contrary to the expectation of the peaceful resolution of the future of Taiwan; and (14) the United States and Taiwan should expand consultation and cooperation on combating the Coronavirus Disease 2019 ( COVID-19 1258. Report on supply chain security cooperation with Taiwan Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the head of each appropriate Federal department and agency, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the following: (1) The feasibility of establishing a high-level, interagency United States-Taiwan working group for coordinating cooperation related to supply chain security. (2) A discussion of the Department of Defense’s current and future plans to engage with Taiwan with respect to activities ensuring supply chain security. (3) A discussion of obstacles encountered in forming, executing, or implementing agreements with Taiwan for conducting activities to ensure supply chain security. (4) Any other matters the Secretary of Defense determines should be included. 1259. Report on United States-Taiwan medical security partnership Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the following: (1) The goals, objectives, and feasibility of developing a United States-Taiwan medical security partnership on issues related to pandemic preparedness and control. (2) A discussion of current and future plans to engage with Taiwan in medical security activities. (3) An evaluation of cooperation on a range of activities under the partnership to include— (A) research and production of vaccines and medicines; (B) joint conferences with scientists and experts; (C) collaboration relating to and exchanges of medical supplies and equipment; and (D) the use of hospital ships such as the United States Naval Ship Comfort and United States Naval Ship Mercy. (4) Any other matters the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate. G Other matters 1261. Provision of goods and services to Kwajalein Atoll (a) Authority for provision of goods and services Chapter 767 7596. Provision of goods and services to Kwajalein Atoll (a) Authority (1) In general The Secretary of the Army may, subject to the concurrence of the Secretary of State as provided in paragraph (2), use any amounts appropriated to the Department of the Army to provide goods and services, including inter-atoll transportation, to the Government of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and to other eligible patrons at Kwajalein Atoll, under regulations and at rates to be prescribed by the Secretary of the Army in accordance with this section. (2) Effect on compact The Secretary of State may not concur to the provision of goods and services under paragraph (1) if the Secretary determines that such provision would be inconsistent with the Compact of Free Association between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of the Marshall Islands (as set forth in title II of the Compact of Free Association Act of 1985 ( 48 U.S.C. 1901 (b) Reimbursement (1) Authority to collect reimbursement The Secretary of the Army may collect reimbursement from the Government of the Republic of the Marshall Islands or eligible patrons for the provision of goods and services under this section in an amount that does not exceed the costs to the United States of providing such goods or services. (2) Maximum reimbursement The total amount collected in a fiscal year pursuant to the authority under paragraph (1) may not exceed $7,000,000. . (b) Clerical amendments The table of contents for chapter 767 Sec. 7595. Provision of goods and services to Kwajalein Atoll. . 1262. Annual briefings on certain foreign military bases of adversaries (a) In general Chapter 3 130l. Annual briefings on certain foreign military bases of adversaries. (a) Requirement Not later than February 15 of each year, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, shall provide to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a briefing on— (1) covered foreign military bases and the related capabilities of that foreign military; and (2) the effects of such bases and capabilities on— (A) the military installations of the United States located outside the United States; and (B) current and future deployments and operations of the armed forces of the United States. (b) Elements Each briefing under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An assessment of covered foreign military bases, including such bases established by China, Russia, and Iran, and any updates to such assessment provided in a previous briefing under such subsection. (2) Information regarding known plans for any future covered foreign military base. (3) An assessment of the capabilities, including those pertaining to anti-access and area denial, provided by covered foreign military bases to that foreign military, including an assessment of how such capabilities could be used against the armed forces of the United States in the country and the geographic combatant command in which such base is located. (4) A description of known ongoing activities and capabilities at covered foreign military bases, and how such activities and capabilities advance the foreign policy and national security priorities of the relevant foreign countries. (5) The extent to which covered foreign military bases could be used to counter the defense priorities of the United States. (c) Form Each briefing under subsection (a) shall be provided in classified form. (d) Covered foreign military base defined In this section, the term covered foreign military base . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 130l. Annual briefings on certain foreign military bases of adversaries. . 1263. Report on progress of the Department of Defense with respect to denying a fait accompli by a strategic competitor against a covered defense partner (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered defense partner The term covered defense partner Department of Defense Indo-Pacific Strategy Report (2) Fait accompli The term fait accompli (3) Strategic competitor The term strategic competitor Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America: Sharpening the American Military’s Competitive Edge (b) Report on progress of the Department of Defense with respect to denying a fait accompli by a strategic competitor against a covered defense partner (1) In general Not later than April 30 each year, beginning in 2021 and ending in 2026, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the progress of the Department of Defense with respect to improving the ability of the United States Armed Forces to conduct combined joint operations to deny the ability of a strategic competitor to execute a fait accompli against a covered defense partner. (2) Matters to be included Each report under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An explanation of the objectives for the United States Armed Forces that would be necessary to deny the fait accompli by a strategic competitor against a covered defense partner. (B) An identification of joint warfighting capabilities and current efforts to organize, train, and equip the United States Armed Forces in support of the objectives referred to in paragraph (1), including— (i) an assessment of whether the programs included in the most recent future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, are sufficient to enable the United States Armed Forces to conduct joint combined operations to achieve such objectives; (ii) a description of additional investments or force posture adjustments required to maintain or improve the ability of the United States Armed Forces to conduct joint combined operations to achieve such objectives; (iii) a description of the manner in which the Secretary of Defense intends to develop and integrate Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Space Force operational concepts to maintain or improve the ability of the United States Armed Forces to conduct joint combined operations to achieve such objectives; and (iv) an assessment of the manner in which different options for pre-delegating authorities may improve the ability of the United States Armed Forces to conduct joint combined operations to achieve such objectives. (C) An assessment of options for deterring limited use of nuclear weapons by a strategic competitor in the Indo-Pacific region without undermining the ability of the United States Armed Forces to maintain deterrence against other strategic competitors and adversaries. (D) An assessment of a strategic competitor theory of victory for invading and unifying a covered defense partner with such a strategic competitor by military force. (E) A description of the military objectives a strategic competitor would need to achieve in a covered defense partner campaign. (F) A description of the military missions a strategic competitor would need to execute a covered defense partner invasion campaign, including— (i) blockade and bombing operations; (ii) amphibious landing operations; and (iii) combat operations. (G) An assessment of competing demands on a strategic competitor’s resources and how such demands impact such a strategic competitor’s ability to achieve its objectives in a covered defense partner campaign. (H) An assessment of a covered defense partner’s self-defense capability and a summary of defense articles and services that are required to enhance such capability. (I) An assessment of the capabilities of partner and allied countries to conduct combined operations with the United States Armed Forces in a regional contingency. (3) Form Each report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in classified form but may include an unclassified executive summary. 1264. Modification to requirements of the initiative to support protection of national security academic researchers from undue influence and other security threats (a) Enhanced information sharing Subsection (d)(1) section 1286 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( 10 U.S.C. 2358 (other than basic research) (b) Publication of updated list Subsection (e) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) Publication of updated list (A) In general Not later than January 1, 2021, and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the most recently updated list described in subsection (c)(8) in unclassified form (but with a classified annex as applicable) and make the unclassified portion of each such list publicly available on an internet website in a searchable format. (B) Intervening publication The Secretary may submit and publish an updated list described in subparagraph (A) more frequently than required by such subparagraph if the Secretary determines necessary. . 1265. Report on directed use of fishing fleets Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commander of the Office of Naval Intelligence shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate an unclassified report on the use of distant-water fishing fleets by foreign governments as extensions of such countries’ official maritime security forces, including the manner and extent to which such fishing fleets are leveraged in support of naval operations and foreign policy more generally. The report shall also consider the threats, on a country-by-country basis, posed by such use of distant-water fishing fleets to— (1) fishing or other vessels of the United States and partner countries; (2) United States and partner naval and coast guard operations; and (3) other interests of the United States and partner countries. 1266. Expanding the state partnership program in Africa The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, shall seek to build partner capacity and interoperability in the United States Africa Command area of responsibility through increased partnerships with countries on the African continent, military-to-military engagements, and traditional activities of the combatant commands. 1267. Report relating to reduction in the total number of United States Armed Forces deployed to United States Africa Command area of responsibility (a) Reduction described (1) In general If the Department of Defense reduces the number of United States Armed Forces deployed to the United States Africa Command area of responsibility (in this section referred to as AFRICOM AOR (2) United States Armed Forces described United States Armed Forces described in this paragraph are United States Armed Forces that are deployed to AFRICOM AOR but are not under the direct authority of the Commander of United States Africa Command, including— (A) forces deployed in conjunction with other Commands; (B) forces participating in joint exercises; (C) forces identified for pre-planned activities; (D) forces used to assist in emergency situations; and (E) forces designated or assigned for diplomatic or embassy security. (b) Report (1) In general A report described in this subsection is a report that includes each of the following: (A) A strategic plan to— (i) degrade each of the violent extremist organizations described in paragraph (2) within the AFRICOM AOR, to include an assessment of the extent to which such violent extremist organizations pose a direct threat to the United States; and (ii) counter the military influence of China and Russia within the AFRICOM AOR. (B) The average number of United States Armed Forces that are under the direct authority of the Commander of United States Africa Command and deployed to AFRICOM AOR and the amount of associated expenditures, to be listed by month for each of the fiscal years 2019 and 2020 and disaggregated by mission and country, to include those forces deployed to secure United States embassies. (C) The average number of United States Armed Forces that are planned to be under the direct authority of the Commander of United States Africa Command and deployed to AFRICOM AOR and the amount of projected associated expenditures, to be listed by month for fiscal years 2021 and 2022 and disaggregated by mission and country, to include those forces deployed to secure United States embassies. (D) The effect that a reduction described in subsection (a) would have on military and intelligence efforts to combat each of the violent extremist organizations described in paragraph (2), including a statement of the current objectives of the Secretary of Defense with respect to such efforts. (E) A description of any consultation or coordination with the Department of State or the United States Agency for International Development with respect to such a reduction and the effect that such a reduction would have on diplomatic, developmental, or humanitarian efforts in Africa, including statements of the current objectives of the Secretary of State and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development with respect to such efforts. (F) The strength, regenerative capacity, and intent of such violent extremist organizations in the AFRICOM AOR, including— (i) an assessment of the number of fighters in the Sahel, the Horn of Africa, and West Africa who are members of such violent extremist organizations; (ii) the threat such violent extremist organizations pose to host nations and United States allies and partners, and the extent to which such violent extremist organizations pose a direct threat to the United States; and (iii) the likely reaction of such violent extremist organizations to the withdrawal of United States Armed Forces. (G) The strategic risks involved with countering such violent extremist organizations following such a reduction. (H) The operational risks involved with conducting United States led or enabled operations in Africa against such violent extremist organizations following such a reduction. (I) For any region of the AFRICOM AOR in which United States Armed Forces currently are present or conduct activities, the effect such a reduction would have on power and influence of China and Russia in such region. (J) Any consultation or coordination with United States allies and partners concerning such a reduction. (K) An assessment of the response from the governments and military forces of France, the United Kingdom, and Canada to such a reduction. (2) Violent extremist organizations described The violent extremist organizations described in this paragraph are adversarial groups and forces in the AFRICOM AOR, as determined by the Secretary of Defense. (c) Additional reporting requirement Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes the information required by subsection (b)(1)(B). (d) Form The reports required by subsections (b) and (c) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. (e) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means— (1) the congressional defense committees (which has the meaning given the term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code); (2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives; and (3) the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. 1268. Report on enhancing partnerships between the United States and African countries (a) Report required (1) In general Not later than June 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the activities and resources required to enhance security and economic partnerships between the United States and African countries. (2) Elements The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An assessment of the infrastructure accessible to the Department of Defense on the continent of Africa. (B) An identification of the ability of the Department to conduct freedom of movement on the continent, including identifying the activities of partners, allies, and other Federal departments and agencies that are facilitated by the Department’s ability to conduct freedom of movement. (C) Recommendations to meet the requirements identified in subparagraph (B), including— (i) dual-use infrastructure projects; (ii) military construction; (iii) the acquisition of additional mobility capability by African countries or the United States Armed Forces, including strategic air lift, tactical air lift, or sealift capability; or (iv) any other option as determined by the Secretary. (D) Recommendations to expand and strengthen partner and ally capability, including traditional activities of the combatant commands, train and equip opportunities, partnerships with the National Guard and the United States Coast Guard, and multilateral contributions. (E) Recommendations for enhancing joint exercises and training. (F) An analysis of the security, economic, and stability benefits of the recommendations identified under subparagraphs (C) through (E). (G) (i) A plan to fully resource United States force posture, capabilities, and stability operations, including— (I) a detailed assessment of the resources required to address the elements described in subparagraphs (B) through (E), including specific cost estimates for recommended investments or projects; and (II) a detailed timeline to achieve the recommendations described in subparagraphs (B) through (D). (ii) The specific cost estimates required by clause (i)(I) shall, to the maximum extent practicable, include the following: (I) With respect to procurement accounts— (aa) amounts displayed by account, budget activity, line number, line item, and line item title; and (bb) a description of the requirements for each such amount. (II) With respect to research, development, test, and evaluation accounts— (aa) amounts displayed by account, budget activity, line number, program element, and program element title; and (bb) a description of the requirements for each such amount. (III) With respect to operation and maintenance accounts— (aa) amounts displayed by account title, budget activity title, line number, and subactivity group title; and (bb) a description of the specific manner in which each such amount would be used. (IV) With respect to military personnel accounts— (aa) amounts displayed by account, budget activity, budget subactivity, and budget subactivity title; and (bb) a description of the requirements for each such amount. (V) With respect to each project under military construction accounts (including unspecified minor military construction and amounts for planning and design), the country, location, project title, and project amount for each fiscal year. (VI) With respect to any expenditure or proposed appropriation not described in clause (i) through (iv), a level of detail equivalent or greater than the level of detail provided in the future-years defense program submitted pursuant to section 221(a) of title 10, United States Code. (3) Considerations In preparing the report required under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consider— (A) the economic development and stability of African countries; (B) the strategic and economic value of the relationships between the United States and African countries; (C) the military, intelligence, diplomatic, developmental, and humanitarian efforts of China and Russia on the African continent; and (D) the ability of the United States, allies, and partners to combat violent extremist organizations operating in Africa. (4) Form The report required under paragraph (1) may be submitted in classified form, but shall include an unclassified summary. (b) Interim briefing required Not later than April 15, 2021, the Secretary of Defense (acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), and the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation) and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall provide to the congressional defense committees a joint interim briefing, and any written comments the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff consider necessary, with respect to their assessments of the report anticipated to be submitted under subsection (a). (c) Definitions In this section: (1) Dual-use infrastructure projects The term dual-use infrastructure projects (2) Appropriate congressional committees The term appropriate congressional committees (A) the congressional defense committees; and (B) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1269. Sense of Congress with respect to Qatar It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the United States and the country of Qatar have built a strong, enduring, and forward-looking strategic partnership based on long-standing and mutually beneficial cooperation, including through security, defense, and economic ties; (2) robust security cooperation between the United States and Qatar is crucial to promoting peace and stability in the Middle East region; (3) Qatar plays a unique role as host of the forward headquarters for the United States Central Command, and that partnership facilitates United States coalition operations countering terrorism; (4) Qatar is a major security cooperation partner of the United States, as recognized in the 2018 Strategic Dialogue and the 2019 Memorandum of Understanding to expand Al Udeid Air Base to improve and expand accommodation for United States military personnel; (5) the United States values Qatar’s provision of access to its military facilities and its management and financial assistance in expanding the Al Udeid Air Base, which supports the continued security presence of the United States in the Middle East region; and (6) the United States should— (A) continue to strengthen the relationship between the United States and Qatar, including through security and economic cooperation; and (B) seek a resolution to the dispute between partner countries of the Arabian Gulf, which would promote peace and stability in the Middle East region. 1270. Sense of Congress on United States military support for and participation in the Multinational Force and Observers It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the mission of the Multinational Force and Observers (MFO) is to supervise implementation of the security provisions of the Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty, signed at Washington on March 26, 1979, and employ best efforts to prevent any violation of its terms; (2) the MFO was established by the Protocol to the Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty, signed on August 3, 1981, and remains a critical institution for regional peace and stability; and (3) as a signatory to the Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty and subsequent Protocol, the United States strongly supports and encourages continued United States military support for and participation in the MFO. 1271. Prohibition on support for military participation against the Houthis (a) Prohibition relating to support None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be made available to provide United States logistical support to the Saudi-led coalition’s operations against the Houthis in Yemen for coalition strikes, specifically by providing maintenance or transferring spare parts to coalition members flying warplanes engaged in anti-Houthi bombings for coalition strikes. (b) Prohibition relating to military participation None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be made available for any civilian or military personnel of the Department of Defense or contractors of the Department to command, coordinate, participate in the movement of, or accompany the regular or irregular military forces of the Saudi and United Arab Emirates-led coalition forces engaged in hostilities against the Houthis in Yemen or in situations in which there exists an imminent threat that such coalition forces become engaged in such hostilities, unless and until the President has obtained specific statutory authorization, in accordance with section 8(a) of the War Powers Resolution ( 50 U.S.C. 1547(a) (c) Rule of construction The prohibitions under this section may not be construed to apply with respect to United States Armed Forces engaged in operations directed at al-Qaeda or associated forces. 1272. Rule of construction relating to use of military force Nothing in this Act or any amendment made by this Act may be construed to authorize the use of military force. XIII Cooperative Threat Reduction 1301. Funding allocations; specification of cooperative threat reduction funds (a) Funding allocation Of the $373,690,000 authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2021 in section 301 and made available by the funding table in division D for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program established under section 1321 of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Act ( 50 U.S.C. 3711 (1) For strategic offensive arms elimination, $2,924,000. (2) For chemical weapons destruction, $12,856,000. (3) For global nuclear security, $33,919,000. (4) For cooperative biological engagement, $216,200,000. (5) For proliferation prevention, $79,869,000. (6) For activities designated as Other Assessments/Administrative Costs, $27,922,000. (b) Specification of cooperative threat reduction funds Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in division D for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program shall be available for obligation for fiscal years 2021, 2022, and 2023. XIV Other authorizations A Military programs 1401. Working capital funds Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 1402. Chemical agents and munitions destruction, defense (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2021 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. (b) Use Amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) are authorized for— (1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 ( 50 U.S.C. 1521 (2) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such Act. 1403. Drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, defense-wide Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2021 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 1404. Defense Inspector General Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2021 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 1405. Defense health program Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for the Defense Health Program for use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing for the health of eligible beneficiaries, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 1406. National defense sealift fund Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for the National Defense Sealift Fund, as specified in the funding tables in section 4501. B Other matters 1411. Authority for transfer of funds to joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility demonstration fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois (a) Authority for transfer of funds Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 1405 and available for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance, $137,000,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( Public Law 111–84 (b) Use of transferred funds For the purposes of subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement covered by section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( Public Law 110–417 1412. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund the sum of $70,300,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces Retirement Home. XV Authorization of additional appropriations for overseas contingency operations A Authorization of appropriations 1501. Purpose The purpose of this title is to authorize appropriations for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2021 to provide additional funds for overseas contingency operations being carried out by the Armed Forces. 1502. Procurement Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4102. 1503. Research, development, test, and evaluation Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in the funding table in section 4202. 1504. Operation and maintenance Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4302. 1505. Military personnel Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, military personnel accounts, as specified in the funding table in section 4402. 1506. Working capital funds Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 1507. Drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, defense-wide Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2021 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 1508. Defense Inspector General Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2021 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 1509. Defense Health Program Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2021 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. B Financial matters 1511. Treatment as additional authorizations The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated by this Act. 1512. Special transfer authority (a) Authority To transfer authorizations (1) Authority Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal year 2021 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred. (2) Limitation The total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this subsection may not exceed $2,500,000,000. (b) Terms and conditions (1) In general Transfers under this section shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as transfers under section 1001. (2) Additional limitation on transfers from the national guard and reserve equipment The authority provided by subsection (a) may not be used to transfer any amount from National Guard and Reserve Equipment. (c) Additional authority The transfer authority provided by this section is in addition to the transfer authority provided under section 1001. C Other matters 1521. Afghanistan security forces fund (a) Continuation of prior authorities and notice and reporting requirements Funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2021 shall be subject to the conditions contained in— (1) subsections (b) through (f) of section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( Public Law 110–181 (2) section 1521(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 (b) Extension of prior notice and reporting requirements Section 1521(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 through January 31, 2021 through January 31, 2023 (c) Equipment disposition (1) Acceptance of certain equipment Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense may accept equipment that is procured using amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund by this Act and is intended for transfer to the security forces of the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of the Interior of the Government of Afghanistan, but is not accepted by such security forces. (2) Conditions on acceptance of equipment Before accepting any equipment under the authority provided by paragraph (1), the Commander of United States forces in Afghanistan shall make a determination that such equipment was procured for the purpose of meeting requirements of the security forces of the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of the Interior of the Government of Afghanistan, as agreed to by both the Government of Afghanistan and the Government of the United States, but is no longer required by such security forces or was damaged before transfer to such security forces. (3) Elements of determination In making a determination under paragraph (2) regarding equipment, the Commander of United States forces in Afghanistan shall consider alternatives to the acceptance of such equipment by the Secretary. An explanation of each determination, including the basis for the determination and the alternatives considered, shall be included in the relevant quarterly report required under paragraph (5). (4) Treatment as department of defense stocks Equipment accepted under the authority provided by paragraph (1) may be treated as stocks of the Department of Defense upon notification to the congressional defense committees of such treatment. (5) Quarterly reports on equipment disposition (A) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and every 90-day period thereafter during which the authority provided by paragraph (1) is exercised, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the equipment accepted during the period covered by such report under the following: (i) This subsection. (ii) Section 1521(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 (iii) Section 1531(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( Public Law 114–92 (iv) Section 1532(b) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck Public Law 113–291 (v) Section 1531(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 ( Public Law 113–66 10 U.S.C. 2302 (B) Elements Each report under subparagraph (A) shall include a list of all equipment that was accepted during the period covered by such report and treated as stocks of the Department of Defense and copies of the determinations made under paragraph (2), as required by paragraph (3). (d) Security of afghan women (1) In general Of the funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2021, it is the goal that $29,100,000, but in no event less than $10,000,000, shall be used for the recruitment, integration, retention, training, and treatment of women in the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces. (2) Types of programs and activities Such programs and activities may include— (A) efforts to recruit and retain women into the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces, including the special operations forces; (B) programs and activities of the Directorate of Human Rights and Gender Integration of the Ministry of Defense of Afghanistan and the Office of Human Rights, Gender and Child Rights of the Ministry of Interior of Afghanistan; (C) development and dissemination of gender and human rights educational and training materials and programs within the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Interior of Afghanistan; (D) efforts to address harassment and violence against women within the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces; (E) improvements to infrastructure that address the requirements of women serving in the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces, including appropriate equipment for female security and police forces, and transportation for policewomen to their station; (F) support for Afghanistan National Police Family Response Units; (G) security provisions for high-profile female police and military officers; (H) programs to promote conflict prevention, management, and resolution through the meaningful participation of Afghan women in the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces, by exposing Afghan women and girls to the activities of and careers available with such forces, encouraging their interest in such careers, or developing their interest and skills necessary for service in such forces; and (I) enhancements to Afghan National Defense and Security Forces recruitment programs for targeted advertising with the goal of increasing the number of female recruits. (e) Assessment of afghanistan progress on objectives (1) Assessment required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate an assessment describing— (A) the progress of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan toward meeting shared security objectives; and (B) the efforts of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan to manage, employ, and sustain the equipment and inventory provided under subsection (a). (2) Matters to be included In conducting the assessment required by paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall include each of the following: (A) The extent to which the Government of Afghanistan has a strategy for, and has taken steps toward, increased accountability and the reduction of corruption within the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Interior of Afghanistan. (B) The extent to which the capability and capacity of the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces have improved as a result of Afghanistan Security Forces Fund investment, including through training, and an articulation of the metrics used to assess such improvements. (C) The extent to which the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces have been able to increase pressure on the Taliban, al-Qaeda, the Haqqani network, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria-Khorasan, and other terrorist organizations, including by re-taking territory, defending territory, and disrupting attacks. (D) The distribution practices of the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces and whether the Government of Afghanistan is ensuring that supplies, equipment, and weaponry supplied by the United States are appropriately distributed to, and employed by, security forces charged with fighting the Taliban and other terrorist organizations. (E) A description of— (i) the policy governing the use of Acquisition and Cross Servicing Agreements (ACSA) in Afghanistan; (ii) each ACSA transaction by type, amount, and recipient for calendar year 2020; and (iii) for any transactions from the United States to Afghan military forces, an explanation for why such transaction was not carried out under the authorities of the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund. (F) The extent to which the Government of Afghanistan has designated the appropriate staff, prioritized the development of relevant processes, and provided or requested the allocation of resources necessary to support a peace and reconciliation process in Afghanistan. (G) A description of the ability of the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Interior of Afghanistan to manage and account for previously divested equipment, including a description of any vulnerabilities or weaknesses of the internal controls of such Ministry of Defense and Ministry of Interior and any plan in place to address shortfalls. (H) A description of any significant irregularities in the divestment of equipment to the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces during the period beginning on May 1, 2020, and ending on May 1, 2021, including any major losses of such equipment or any inability on the part of the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces to account for equipment so procured. (I) A description of the sustainment and maintenance costs required during the 5-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, for major weapons platforms previously divested, and a description of the plan for the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces to maintain such platforms in the future. (J) The extent to which the Government of Afghanistan is adhering to conditions for receiving assistance established in annual financial commitment letters or any other bilateral agreements with the United States. (K) The extent to which the Government of Afghanistan has made progress in achieving security sector benchmarks as outlined by the United States-Afghan Compact (commonly known as the Kabul Compact (L) The extent to which the Government of Afghanistan or the Secretary has developed a plan to integrate former Taliban fighters into the Ministries of Defense or Interior. (M) Such other factors as the Secretaries consider appropriate. (3) Form The assessment required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (4) Withholding of assistance for insufficient progress (A) In general If the Secretary of Defense determines, in coordination with the Secretary of State and pursuant to the assessment under paragraph (1), that the Government of Afghanistan has made insufficient progress in the areas described in paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense shall— (i) withhold $401,500,000, to be derived from amounts made available for assistance for the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces, from expenditure or obligation until the date on which the Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Government of Afghanistan has made sufficient progress; and (ii) notify the congressional defense committees not later than 30 days before withholding such funds. (B) Waiver If the Secretary of Defense determines that withholding such assistance would impede the national security objectives of the United States by prohibiting, restricting, delaying, or otherwise limiting the provision of assistance, the Secretary may waive the withholding requirement under subparagraph (A) if the Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of State, certifies such determination to the congressional defense committees not later than 30 days before the effective date of the waiver. (f) Additional reporting requirements The Secretary of Defense shall include in the materials submitted in support of the budget for fiscal year 2022 that is submitted by the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, each of the following: (1) The amount of funding provided in fiscal year 2020 through the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund to the Government of Afghanistan in the form of direct government-to-government assistance or on-budget assistance for the purposes of supporting any entity of such government, including the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces, the Afghan Ministry of Interior, or the Afghan Ministry of Defense. (2) The amount of funding provided and anticipated to be provided, as of the date of the submission of the materials, in fiscal year 2021 through such Fund in such form. (3) To the extent the amount described in paragraph (2) exceeds the amount described in paragraph (1), an explanation as to the reason why the such amount is greater and the specific entities and purposes that were supported by such increase. XVI Strategic Programs, Cyber, and Intelligence Matters A Space Activities 1601. National Security Space Launch program (a) Phase two acquisition strategy In carrying out the phase two acquisition strategy, the Secretary of the Air Force— (1) may not change the mission performance requirements; (2) may not change the acquisition schedule; (3) may not award phase two contracts after September 30, 2024; (4) shall award phase two contracts to not more than two National Security Space Launch providers; (5) shall ensure that launch services are procured only from National Security Space Launch providers that meet the requirements for the phase two contracts; (6) not later than 180 days after the date on which phase two contracts are awarded, shall terminate launch service agreement contracts awarded under such phase two acquisition strategy to each National Security Space Launch provider that is not a down-selected National Security Launch provider; and (7) may not increase the total amount of funding included in the initial launch service agreements with down-selected National Security Launch providers. (b) Reusability (1) Certification Not later than 18 months after the date on which the Secretary determines the down-selected National Security Space Launch providers, the Secretary shall certify to the appropriate congressional committees that the Secretary has completed all non-recurring design validation of previously flown launch hardware for National Security Space Launch providers offering such hardware for use in phase two contracts or in future national security space missions. (2) Report Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Secretary determines the down-selected National Security Space Launch providers, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the progress of the Secretary with respect to completing all non-recurring design validation of previously flown launch hardware described in paragraph (1), including— (A) a justification for any deviation from the new entrant certification guide; and (B) a description of such progress with respect to National Security Space Launch providers that are not down-selected National Security Space Launch providers, if applicable. (c) Funding for certification, infrastructure, and technology development (1) Authority Pursuant to section 2371b of title 10, United States Code, not later than September 30, 2021, the Secretary of the Air Force shall enter into three agreements described in paragraph (3) with National Security Space Launch providers— (A) to maintain competition in order to maximize the likelihood of at least three National Security Space Launch providers competing for phase three contracts; and (B) to support innovation for national security launches under phase three contracts. (2) Competitive procedures The Secretary shall carry out paragraph (1) by conducting a full and open competition among all National Security Space Launch providers that may submit bids for a phase three contract. (3) Agreements An agreement described in this paragraph is an agreement that provides a National Security Space Launch provider with not more than $150,000,000 for the provider to conduct either or both of the following activities: (A) Meet the certification and infrastructure requirements that are— (i) unique to national security space missions; and (ii) necessary for a phase three contract. (B) Develop transformational technologies in support of the national security space launch capability for phase three contracts (such as technologies regarding launch, maneuver, and transport capabilities for enhanced resiliency and security technologies, as identified in the National Security Launch Architecture study of the Space and Missile Systems Center of the Space Force). (4) Report Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary enters into an agreement under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report explaining how the Secretary determined the certification and infrastructure requirements and the transformational technologies covered under paragraph (3). (d) Briefing Not later than December 31, 2020, the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the progress made by the Secretary in ensuring that full and open competition exists for phase three contracts, including— (1) a description of progress made to establish the requirements for phase three contracts, including such requirements that the Secretary determines cannot be met by the commercial market; (2) whether the Secretary determines that additional development funding will be necessary for such phase; (3) a description of the estimated costs for the development described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (c)(3); and (4) how the Secretary will— (A) ensure full and open competition for technology development for phase three contracts; and (B) maintain competition. (e) Rule of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to delay the award of phase two contracts. (f) Definitions In this section: (1) The term appropriate congressional committees (A) the congressional defense committees; and (B) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. (2) The term down-selected National Security Launch provider (3) The term phase three contract (4) The term phase two acquisition strategy (5) The term phase two contract 1602. Requirement to buy certain satellite component from national technology and industrial base Section 2534(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (7) Star tracker A star tracker used in a satellite weighing more than 400 pounds whose principle purpose is to support the national security, defense, or intelligence needs of the United States Government. . 1603. Commercial space domain awareness capabilities (a) Procurement Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall procure commercial space domain awareness services by awarding at least two contracts for such services. (b) Limitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for the enterprise space battle management command and control, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of Defense, without delegation, certifies to the congressional committees that the Secretary of the Air Force has awarded the contracts under subsection (a). (c) Report Not later than January 31, 2021, the Chief of Space Operations, in coordination with the Secretary of the Air Force, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report detailing the commercial space domain awareness services, data, and analytics of objects in low-earth orbit that have been purchased during the two-year period preceding the date of the report. The report shall be submitted in unclassified form. (d) Commercial space domain awareness services defined In this section, the term commercial space domain awareness services (1) provide conjunction and maneuver alerts; (2) monitor breakup and launch events; and (2) detect and track objects smaller than 10 centimeters in size. 1604. Responsive satellite infrastructure (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall establish a domestic responsive satellite manufacturing capability for Department of Defense space operations to be used— (1) for the development of components, systems, structures, and payloads necessary to reconstitute a national security space asset that has been destroyed, failed, or otherwise determined to be incapable of performing mission requirements; and (2) to rapidly acquire and field necessary space-based capabilities needed to maintain continuity of national security space missions and limit capability disruption to the warfighter. (b) Plan for responsive satellite infrastructure The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of the Air Force, the Chief of Space Operations, and the Commander of United States Space Command, shall develop an operational plan and acquisition strategy for responsive satellite infrastructure to swiftly identify need, develop capability, and launch a responsive satellite to fill a critical capability gap in the event of destruction or failure of a space asset or otherwise determined need. (c) Matters included The plan outlined under subsection (b) shall include the following: (1) A process for determining whether the reconstitution of a space asset is necessary. (2) The timeframe in which a developed satellite is determined to be responsive (3) A plan to leverage domestic commercial entities in the new space mission responsiveness (A) power systems and solar arrays; (B) payloads and integration features; and (C) buses and structures. (4) An assessment of acquisition requirements and standards necessary for commercial entities to meet Department of Defense validation of supply chains, processes, and technologies while operating under rapid development cycles needed to maintain a responsive timeframe as determined by paragraph (2). (5) Such other matters as the Secretary considers appropriate. (d) Report required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report detailing the plan under subsection (b). 1605. Policy to ensure launch of small-class payloads (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall establish a small launch and satellite policy to ensure responsive and reliable access to space through the processing and launch of Department of Defense small-class payloads. (b) Policy The policy under subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, providing resources and policy guidance to sustain— (1) the availability of small-class payload launch service providers using launch vehicles capable of delivering into space small payloads designated by the Secretary of Defense as a national security payload; (2) a robust small-class payload space launch infrastructure and industrial base; (3) the availability of rapid, responsive, and reliable space launches for national security space programs to— (A) improve the responsiveness and flexibility of a national security space system; (B) lower the costs of launching a national security space system; and (C) maintain risks of mission success at acceptable levels; (4) a minimum number of dedicated launches each year; and (5) full and open competition including small launch providers and rideshare opportunities. (c) Acquisition strategy The Secretary shall develop and carry out a five-year phased acquisition strategy, including near and long term, for the small launch and satellite policy under subsection (a). (d) Elements The acquisition strategy under subsection (c) shall— (1) provide the necessary— (A) stability in budgeting and acquisition of capabilities; (B) flexibility to the Federal Government; and (C) procedures for fair competition; and (2) specifically take into account, as appropriate per competition, the effect of— (A) contracts or agreements for launch services or launch capability entered into by the Department of Defense with small-class payload space launch providers; (B) the requirements of the Department of Defense, including with respect to launch capabilities and pricing data, that are met by such providers; (C) the cost of integrating a satellite onto a launch vehicle; (D) launch performance history (at least three successful launches of the same launch vehicle design) and maturity; (E) ability of a launch provider to provide the option of dedicated and rideshare launch capabilities; and (F) any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate. (e) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing a plan for the policy under subsection (a), including with respect to the cost of launches and an assessment of mission risk. 1606. Tactically responsive space launch operations The Secretary of the Air Force shall implement a tactically responsive space launch program— (1) to provide long-term continuity for tactically responsive space launch operations across the future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of title 10, United States Code; (2) to accelerate the development of— (A) responsive launch concepts of operations; (B) tactics; (C) training; and (D) procedures; (3) to develop appropriate processes for tactically responsive space launch, including— (A) mission assurance processes; and (B) command and control, tracking, telemetry, and communications; and (4) to identify basing capabilities necessary to enable tactically responsive space launch, including mobile launch range infrastructure. 1607. Limitation on availability of funds for prototype program for multi-global navigation satellite system receiver development Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for increment 2 of the acquisition of military Global Positioning System user equipment terminals, not more than 80 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of Defense— (1) certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary of the Air Force is carrying out the program required under section 1607 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (2) provides to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a briefing on how the Secretary is implementing such program, including with respect to addressing each element specified in subsection (b) of such section. 1608. Limitation on awarding contracts to entities operating commercial terrestrial communication networks that cause interference with the Global Positioning System The Secretary of Defense may not enter into a contract, or extend or renew a contract, with an entity that engages in commercial terrestrial operations using the 1525–1559 megahertz band or the 1626.5–1660.5 megahertz band unless the Secretary has certified to the congressional defense committees that such operations do not cause harmful interference to a Global Positioning System device of the Department of Defense. 1609. Prohibition on availability of funds for certain purposes relating to the Global Positioning System (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) On April 19, 2020, the Federal Communications Commission issued an order and authorization granting Ligado Networks LLC the authority to operate a nationwide terrestrial communications network using the 1526–1536 megahertz band, the 1627.5–1637.5 megahertz band, or the 1646.5–1656.5 megahertz band. (2) In an attempt to address interference to the Global Positioning System operating near those bands, Ligado Networks LLC has committed to assuming the costs mitigating any interference caused by their network. (3) In the approval order, the Federal Communications Commission directed that Ligado takes all necessary mitigation measures to prevent or remediate any potential harmful interference to U.S. Government devices, including devices used by the military, that are identified both pre- and post-deployment of Ligado’s network. (4) In a letter to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives dated May 21, 2020, Ligado Networks LLC reaffirmed the commitment to bear the costs to the Department of Defense, stating that the FCC directed Ligado to provide protections to GPS devices using its spectrum by imposing stringent coordination, cooperation, and replacement obligations on Ligado, so that Ligado bears the burden Make no mistake: the obligation is ours, and the burden falls solely on our company. (b) Prohibition Except as provided by subsection (c), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 or any subsequent fiscal year for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retrofit any Global Positioning System device or system, or network that uses the Global Positioning System, in order to mitigate interference from commercial terrestrial operations using the 1526–1536 megahertz band, the 1627.5–1637.5 megahertz band, or the 1646.5–1656.5 megahertz band. (c) Actions not prohibited The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to any action taken by the Secretary of Defense relating to— (1) conducting technical or information exchanges with the entity that operates the commercial terrestrial operations in the megahertz bands specified in such subsection; (2) seeking compensation for interference from such entity; or (3) Global Positioning System receiver upgrades needed to address other resiliency requirements. 1610. Report on resilient protected communications satellites (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) The national command, control, and communications system of the Department of Defense is essential to the national security of the United States. (2) The Department of Defense requires the space segments of such system to be resilient and survivable to address advanced threats from Russia and China. (3) The next-generation overhead persistent infrared missile warning satellites are being upgraded with enhanced resiliency features to make them much less vulnerable to attack and will begin launch in 2025. (4) Because missile warning satellites rely on protected communications satellites to relay warnings and response orders, the next-generation overhead persistent infrared missile warning satellites will require protected communications satellites with enhanced resiliency features, however, the current plan of the Space Force is to provide those capabilities with the evolved strategic satellite communications program that will not be available until 2032 or later. (5) As a result, the Chief of Space Operations should implement an accelerated plan to achieve more resilient protected communications satellites without delay. (b) Report Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief of Space Operations shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on how the Space Force will address the need for resilient protected communications satellites during the years 2025 through 2032. B Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities 1611. Validation of capability requirements of National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency Section 442 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (f) Validation The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency shall assist the Joint Chiefs of Staff, combatant commands, and the military departments in establishing, coordinating, consolidating, and validating mapping, charting, geodetic data, and safety of navigation capability requirements through a formal process governed by the Joint Staff. Consistent with validated requirements, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency shall provide aeronautical and nautical charts that are safe for navigation, maps, books, datasets, models, and geodetic products. . 1612. Safety of navigation mission of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (a) Mission of National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency Section 442 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 1611, is further amended— (1) in subsection (b)— (A) by striking means of navigating vessels of the Navy and the merchant marine the means for safe navigation (B) by striking and inexpensive nautical charts geospatial information for use by the departments and agencies of the United States, the merchant marine, and navigators generally. (2) in subsection (c)— (A) by striking shall prepare and shall acquire, prepare, and (B) by striking charts safe-for-navigation charts and datasets (C) by striking geodetic geomatics (b) Maps, charts, and books (1) In general Section 451 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) in the heading, by striking and books books, and datasets (B) in paragraph (1), by striking maps, charts, and nautical books nautical and aeronautical charts, topographic and geomatics maps, books, models, and datasets (C) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows: (2) acquire (by purchase, lease, license, or barter) all necessary rights, including copyrights and other intellectual property rights, required to prepare, publish, and furnish to navigators the products described in paragraph (1). . (2) Table of sections amendment The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter II of chapter 22 451. Maps, charts, books, and datasets. . (c) Civil actions barred Section 456 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsections (a) and (b) and inserting the following: No civil action may be brought against the United States on the basis of the content of geospatial information prepared or disseminated by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. . (d) Definitions Section 467 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (4)— (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting or about boundaries on (B) in subparagraph (A), by striking statistical (C) in subparagraph (B)— (i) by striking geodetic geomatics (ii) by inserting and services products (2) in paragraph (5), by inserting or about activities on 1613. National Academies Climate Security Roundtable (a) In general The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence, shall enter into a joint agreement with the Academies to create a new National Academies Climate Security Roundtable roundtable (b) Participants The roundtable shall include— (1) the members of the Climate Security Advisory Council established under section 120 of the National Security Act of 1947 ( 50 U.S.C. 3060 (2) senior representatives and practitioners from Federal science agencies, elements of the intelligence community, and the Department of Defense, who are not members of the Council; and (3) key stakeholders in the United States scientific enterprise, including institutions of higher education, Federal research laboratories (including the national security laboratories), industry, and nonprofit research organizations. (c) Purpose The purpose of the roundtable is— (1) to support the duties and responsibilities of the Climate Security Advisory Council under section 120(c) of the National Security Act of 1947 ( 50 U.S.C. 3060(c) (2) to develop best practices for the exchange of data, knowledge, and expertise among elements of the intelligence community, elements of the Federal Government that are not elements of the intelligence community, and non-Federal researchers; (3) to facilitate dialogue and collaboration about relevant collection and analytic priorities among participants of the roundtable with respect to climate security; (4) to identify relevant gaps in the exchange of data, knowledge, or expertise among participants of the roundtable with respect to climate security, and consider viable solutions to address such gaps; and (5) to provide any other assistance, resources, or capabilities that the Director of National Intelligence or the Under Secretary determines necessary with respect to the Council carrying out the duties and responsibilities of the Council under such section 120(c). (d) Meetings The roundtable shall meet at least quarterly, in coordination with the meetings of the Climate Security Advisory Council under section 120(c)(1) of the National Security Act of 1947 ( 50 U.S.C. 3060(c)(1) (e) Reports and briefings The joint agreement under subsection (a) shall specify that— (1) the roundtable shall organize workshops, on at least a biannual basis, that include both participants of the roundtable and persons who are not participants, and may be conducted in classified or unclassified form in accordance with subsection (f); (2) on a regular basis, the roundtable shall produce classified and unclassified reports on the topics described in subsection (c) and the activities of the roundtable, and other documents in support of the duties and responsibilities of the Climate Security Advisory Council under section 120(c) of the National Security Act of 1947 ( 50 U.S.C. 3060(c) (3) the Academies shall provide recommendations by consensus to the Council on both the topics described in subsection (c) and specific topics as identified by participants of the roundtable; (4) not later than March 1, 2021, and annually thereafter during the life of the roundtable, the Academies shall provide a briefing to the appropriate congressional committees on the progress and activities of the roundtable; and (5) not later than September 30, 2025, the Academies shall submit a final report to the appropriate congressional committees on the activities of the roundtable. (f) Security clearances Each participant of the roundtable shall have a security clearance at the appropriate level to carry out the duties of the participant under this section. A person who is not a participant who attends a workshop under subsection (e)(1) is not required to have a security clearance, and the roundtable shall ensure that any such workshop is held at the appropriate classified or unclassified level. (g) Termination The roundtable shall terminate on September 30, 2025. (h) Definitions In this section: (1) The term Academies (2) The term appropriate congressional committees (A) the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives; and (B) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. (3) The term Federal science agency (4) The term intelligence community 50 U.S.C. 3003 (5) The term national security laboratory 50 U.S.C. 2501 1614. Report on risk to national security posed by quantum computing technologies (a) Report (1) Requirement Not later than December 31, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing an assessment of the current and potential threats and risks posed by quantum computing technologies. The Secretary shall conduct the assessment in a manner that allows the Secretary to better understand and prepare to counter the risks of quantum computing to national security. (2) Matters included The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An identification of national security systems that are vulnerable to current and potential threats and risks posed by quantum computing technologies. (B) An assessment of quantum-resistant cryptographic standards, including a timeline for the development of such standards. (C) An assessment of the feasibility of alternate quantum-resistant models. (D) A description of any funding shortfalls in public and private efforts to develop such standards and models. (E) Recommendations to counter the threats and risks posed by quantum computing technologies that prioritize, secure, and resource the defense of national security systems identified under subparagraph (A). (b) Briefings During the period preceding the date on which the Secretary submits the report under subsection (a), the Secretary shall include in the quarterly briefings under section 484 of title 10, United States Code, an update on the assessment conducted under such subsection. (c) Form The report under subsection (a) may be submitted in classified form. C Cyberspace-Related Matters 1621. Cyber mission forces and cyberspace operations forces Subsection (a) of section 238, title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1)— (A) by striking The Secretary Not later than five days after the submission by the President under section 1105(a) of title 31 of the budget, the Secretary (B) by inserting in both electronic and print formats submit (C) by striking 2017 2021 (2) in paragraph (1), by inserting and the cyberspace operations forces (3) in paragraph (2), by inserting and the cyberspace operations forces 1622. Cyberspace solarium commission Section 1652 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (1) in subsection (b)(1)— (A) in subparagraph (A), by— (i) striking clauses (i) through (iv); and (ii) redesignating clauses (v) through (viii) as clauses (i) through (iv), respectively; and (B) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking and who are appointed under clauses (iv) through (vii) of subparagraph (A) (2) in subsection (d)(2), by striking Seven Six (3) in subsection (h), by— (A) striking (1) In general.— (B) striking paragraph (2); (4) in subsection (i)(1)(B), by striking officers or employees of the United States or (5) in subsection (k)(2)— (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking at the end of the 120-day period beginning on two years after (B) in subparagraph (B), by— (i) striking may use the 120-day shall use the two year (ii) striking for the purposes of concluding its activities, including providing testimony to Congress concerning the final report referred to in that paragraph and disseminating the report for the purposes of— (i) collecting and assessing comments and feedback from the Executive Branch, academia, and the public on the analysis and recommendations contained in the Commission’s report; (ii) collecting and assessing any developments in cybersecurity that may affect the analysis and recommendations contained in the Commission’s report; (iii) reviewing the implementation of the recommendations contained in the Commission’s report; (iv) revising, amending, or making new recommendations based on the assessments and reviews required under clauses (i)–(iii); (v) providing an annual update to the congressional defense committees, the congressional intelligence committees, the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate, the Director of National Intelligence, the Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of Homeland Security in a manner and format determined by the Commission regarding any such revisions, amendments, or new recommendations; and (vi) concluding its activities, including providing testimony to Congress concerning the final report referred to in that paragraph and disseminating the report. ; and (C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (C) If the Commission is extended, and the effective date of such extension is after the date on which the Commission terminated, the Commission shall be deemed reconstituted with the same members and powers that existed on the day before such termination date, except that— (i) a member of the Commission may serve only if the member’s position continues to be authorized under subsection (b); (ii) no compensation or entitlements relating to a person’s status with the Commission shall be due for the period between the termination and reconstitution of the Commission; (iii) nothing in this subparagraph may be construed as requiring the extension or reemployment of any staff member or contractor working for the Commission; (iv) the staff of the Commission shall be— (I) selected by the co-chairs of the Commission in accordance with subsection (h)(1); (II) comprised of not more than four individuals, including a staff director; and (III) resourced in accordance with subsection (g)(4)(A); (v) with the approval of the co-chairs, may be provided by contract with a nongovernmental organization; (vi) any unexpended funds made available for the use of the Commission shall continue to be available for use for the life of the Commission, as well as any additional funds appropriated to the Department of Defense that are made available to the Commission, provided that the total such funds does not exceed $1,000,000 from the reconstitution of the Commission to the completion of the Commission; and (vii) the requirement for an assessment of the final report in subsection (l) shall be updated to require annually for a period of two years further assessments of the Federal Government’s responses to the Commission’s recommendations contained in such final report. . 1623. Tailored cyberspace operations organizations (a) In general Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy, in conjunction with the Chief of Naval Operations, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a study of the Navy Cyber Warfare Development Group (NCWDG). (b) Elements The study required under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An examination of NCWDG’s structure, manning, authorities, funding, and operations. (2) A review of organizational relationships both within the Navy and to other Department of Defense organizations, as well as non-Department of Defense organizations. (3) Recommendations for how the NCWDG can be strengthened and improved, without growth in size. (c) Designation Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of the Navy shall designate the NCWDG as a screened command. (d) Release The Secretary of the Navy shall transmit the study required under subsection (a) to the secretaries of the military services and the Commander of United States Special Operations Command. (e) Exemplar The service secretaries and the Commander of United States Special Operations Command are authorized to establish counterpart tailored cyberspace operations organizations of comparable size to the NCWDG within the military service or command, respectively, of each such secretary and Commander. Such counterpart organizations shall have the same authorities as the NCWDG. Not later than 30 days after receipt by each of the service secretaries and the Commander under subsection (d) of the study required under subsection (a), each such service secretary and Commander, as the case may be, shall brief the congressional defense committees regarding whether or not each such service secretary or Commander intends to utilize the authority under this subsection. 1624. Responsibility for the Sector Risk Management Agency function of the Department of Defense (a) Definitions (1) In general In this section: (A) Critical infrastructure The term critical infrastructure 42 U.S.C. 5195c(e) (B) Sector Risk Management Agency The term Sector Risk Management Agency (2) Reference Any reference to a Sector-Specific Agency in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be deemed to be a reference to the Sector Risk Management Agency of the Federal Government for the relevant critical infrastructure sector. (b) Designation The Secretary of Defense shall designate the Principal Cyber Advisor of the Department of Defense as the lead official, and the Office of the Principal Cyber Advisor as the lead component, for the Department’s role and functions as the Sector Risk Management Agency for the Defense Industrial Base. (c) Responsibilities As the lead official for the Department of Defense’s Sector Risk Management Agency functions, the Principal Cyber Advisor of the Department shall be responsible for all activities performed by the Department in its support of the Defense Industrial Base, as one of the critical infrastructure sectors of the United States. Such activities shall include the following: (1) Synchronization, harmonization, de-confliction, and management for the execution of all Department programs, initiatives, efforts, and communication related to the Department’s Sector Risk Management Agency function, including any Department program, initiative, or effort that addresses the cybersecurity of the Defense Industrial Base. (2) Leadership and management of the Defense Industrial Base Government Coordinating Council. (3) Direct interface and sponsorship of the Defense Industrial Base Sector Coordinating Council. (4) Organization of quarterly in-person meetings of both the Defense Industrial Base Government Coordinating Council and the Defense Industrial Base Sector Coordinating Council. (d) Additional functions In carrying out this section, the Principal Cyber Advisor of the Department of Defense shall— (1) coordinate with relevant Federal departments and agencies, and collaborate with critical infrastructure owners and operators, where appropriate with independent regulatory agencies, and with State, local, territorial, and Tribal entities, as appropriate; (2) serve as a day-to-day Federal interface for the dynamic prioritization and coordination of sector-specific activities; (3) carry out incident management responsibilities; (4) provide, support, or facilitate technical assistance and consultations for the Defense Industrial Base to identify cyber or physical vulnerabilities and help mitigate incidents, as appropriate; and (5) support the statutorily required reporting requirements of such relevant Federal departments and agencies by providing to such departments and agencies on an annual basis sector-specific critical infrastructure information. 1625. Department of Defense Cyber Workforce Efforts (a) Resources for cyber education (1) In general The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Security Agency (NSA), shall examine the current policies permitting National Security Agency employees to use up to 140 hours of paid time toward NSA’s cyber education programs. (2) Report (A) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief Information Officer shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees a strategy for expanding the policies described in paragraph (1) to— (i) individuals who occupy positions described in section 1599f of title 10, United States Code; and (ii) any other individuals who the Chief Information Officer determines appropriate. (B) Implementation plan The report required under subparagraph (A) shall detail the utilization of the policies in place at the National Security Agency, as well as an implementation plan that describes the mechanisms needed to expand the use of such policies to accommodate wider participation by individuals described in such subparagraph. Such implementation plan shall detail how such individuals would be able to connect to the instructional and participatory opportunities available through the efforts, programs, initiatives, and investments accounted for in the report required under section 1649 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (i) GenCyber. (ii) Centers for Academic Excellence – Cyber Defense. (iii) Centers for Academic Excellence – Cyber Operations. (C) Deadline Not later than 120 days after the submission of the report required under subparagraph (A), the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall carry out the implementation plan contained in such report. (b) Improving the training with industry program (1) In general Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Principal Cyber Advisor of the Department of Defense, in consultation with the Principal Cyber Advisors of the military services and the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a review of the current utilization and utility of the Training With Industry (TWI) programs, including relating to the following: (A) Recommendations regarding how to improve and better utilize such programs, including regarding individuals who have completed such programs. (B) An implementation plan to carry out such recommendations. (2) Additional Not later than 90 days after the submission of the report required under paragraph (1), the Principal Cyber Advisor of the Department of Defense shall carry out the implementation plan required under paragraph (1). (c) Alignment of cybersecurity training programs (1) In general Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing recommendations on how cybersecurity training programs described in section 1649 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 can be better aligned and harmonized. (2) Report The report required under paragraph (1) shall provide recommendations concerning the following topics and information: (A) Developing a comprehensive mechanism for utilizing and leveraging the Cyber Excepted Service workforce of the Department of Defense referred to in subsection (a), as well as mechanisms for military participation. (B) Unnecessary redundancies in such programs, or in any related efforts, initiatives, or investments. (C) Mechanisms for tracking participation and transition of participation from one such program to another. (D) Department level oversight and management of such programs. (3) Cyber workforce pipeline and early childhood education (A) Elements The Secretary of Defense shall, when completing the report required under paragraph (1), take into consideration existing Federal childhood cyber education programs, including the programs identified in the report required under section 1649 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (B) Definition In this paragraph, the term military-connected student (i) is a dependent a member of the Armed Forces serving on active duty; and (ii) is enrolled in a preschool, an elementary or secondary school, or an institution of higher education. 1626. Reporting requirements for cross domain compromises and exemptions to policies for information technology (a) Compromise reporting (1) In general Effective beginning in October 2020, the Secretary of Defense and the secretaries of the military services shall submit to the congressional defense committees a monthly report in writing that documents each instance or indication of a cross-domain compromise within the Department of Defense. (2) Procedures The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees procedures for complying with the requirements of subsection (a) consistent with the national security of the United States and the protection of operational integrity. The Secretary shall promptly notify such committees in writing of any changes to such procedures at least 14 days prior to the adoption of any such changes. (3) Definition In this subsection, the term cross domain compromise (b) Exemptions to policy for information technology Not later than six months after the date of the enactment of this Act and biannually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense and the secretaries of the military services shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report in writing that enumerates and details each current exemption to information technology policy, interim Authority To Operate (ATO) order, or both. Each such report shall include other relevant information pertaining to each such exemption, including relating to the following: (1) Risk categorization. (2) Duration. (3) Estimated time remaining. 1627. Assessing private-public collaboration in cybersecurity (a) Requirement Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall— (1) conduct a review and assessment of any ongoing public-private collaborative initiatives involving the Department of Defense and the private sector related to cybersecurity and defense of critical infrastructure, including— (A) the United States Cyber Command’s Pathfinder initiative and any derivative initiative; (B) the Department’s support to and integration with existing Federal cybersecurity centers and organizations; and (C) comparable initiatives led by other Federal departments or agencies that support long-term public-private cybersecurity collaboration; and (2) make recommendations for improvements and the requirements and resources necessary to institutionalize and strengthen the initiatives described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of paragraph (1). (b) Report (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review, assessment, and recommendations under subsection (a). (2) Form The report required under paragraph (1) may be submitted in unclassified or classified form, as necessary. (c) Definition In this section, the term critical infrastructure 42 U.S.C. 5195c(e) 1628. Cyber capabilities and interoperability of the National Guard (a) Evaluation Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in conjunction with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate a review of the statutes, rules, regulations, and standards that pertain to the use of the National Guard for the response to and recovery from significant cyber incidents. (b) Recommendations The review required under subsection (a) shall address the following:: (1) Regulations promulgated under section 903 of title 32, United States Code, to allow the National Guard to conduct homeland defense activities that the Secretary of Defense determines to be necessary and appropriate in accordance with section 902 of such title in response to a cyber attack. (2) Compulsory guidance from the Chief of the National Guard Bureau regarding how the National Guard shall collaborate with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency of the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the Department of Justice through multi-agency task forces, information-sharing groups, incident response planning and exercises, and other relevant forums and activities. (3) A plan for how the Chief of the National Guard Bureau will collaborate with the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop an annex to the National Cyber Incident Response Plan that details the regulations and guidance described in paragraphs (1) and (2). (c) Definition The term significant cyber incident (1) the national security interests, foreign relations, or economy of the United States; or (2) the public confidence, civil liberties, or public health and safety of the American people. 1629. Evaluation of non-traditional cyber support to the Department of Defense (a) Requirement Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Principal Cyber Advisor to the Secretary of Defense, in conjunction with the Under Secretary for Personnel and Readiness of the Department of Defense and the Principal Cyber Advisors of the military services, shall complete an assessment and evaluation of reserve models tailored to the support of cyberspace operations for the Department. (b) Evaluation components The assessment and evaluation required under subsection (a) shall include the following components: (1) A current assessment of reserve and National Guard support to Cyber Operations Forces. (2) An enumeration and evaluation of various reserve, National Guard, auxiliary, and non-traditional support models which are applicable to cyberspace operations, including a consideration of models utilized domestically and internationally. (3) A utility assessment of a dedicated reserve cadre specific to United States Cyber Command and Cyber Operations Forces. (4) An analysis of the costs associated with the models evaluated pursuant to paragraph (2). (5) An assessment of the recruitment programs necessary for implementation of the models evaluated pursuant to paragraph (2). (b) Report (1) In general The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Principal Cyber Advisor of the Department of Defense, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the assessment and evaluation required under subsection (a). (2) Form The report required under paragraph (1) may be submitted in classified or unclassified form, as necessary. 1630. Establishment of integrated cyber center (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the relevant congressional committees a report on Federal cybersecurity centers and the potential for better coordination of Federal cyber efforts at an integrated cyber center within the national cybersecurity and communications integration center of the Department of Homeland Security established pursuant to section 2209 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 ( 6 U.S.C. 659 (b) Contents To prepare the report required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall aggregate information from components of the Department of Homeland Security with information provided to the Secretary of Homeland Security by the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Director of National Intelligence. Such aggregated information shall relate to the following topics: (1) Any challenges regarding capacity and funding identified by the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Defense, or the Director of National Intelligence that negatively impact coordination with the national cybersecurity and communications integration center of the Department of Homeland Security in furtherance of the security and resilience of critical infrastructure. (2) Distinct statutory authorities identified by the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Attorney General, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Secretary of Defense, or the Director of National Intelligence that should not be leveraged by an integrated cyber center within the national cybersecurity and communications integration center. (3) Any challenges associated with effective mission coordination and deconfliction between the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency of the Department of Homeland Security and other Federal agencies that could be addressed with the creation of an integrated cyber center within the national cybersecurity and communications integration center. (4) How capabilities or missions of existing Federal cyber centers could benefit from greater integration or collocation to support cybersecurity collaboration with critical infrastructure at an integrated cyber center within the national cybersecurity and communications integration center, including the following Federal cyber centers: (A) The National Security Agency’s Cyber Threat Operations Center. (B) United States Cyber Command’s Joint Operations Center. (C) The Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s Cyber Threat Intelligence Integration Center. (D) The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s National Cyber Investigative Joint Task Force. (E) The Department of Defense’s Defense Cyber Crime Center. (F) The Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s Intelligence Community Security Coordination Center. (c) Elements The report required under subsection (a) shall— (1) identify any challenges regarding the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s current authorities, structure, resources, funding, ability to recruit and retain its workforce, or interagency coordination that negatively impact the ability of the Agency to fulfill its role as the central coordinator for critical infrastructure cybersecurity and resilience pursuant to its authorities under the Homeland Security Act of 2002, and information on how establishing an integrated cyber center within the national cybersecurity and communications integration center would address such challenges; (2) identify any facility needs for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to adequately host personnel, maintain sensitive compartmented information facilities, and other resources to serve as the primary coordinating body charged with forging whole-of-government, public-private collaboration in cybersecurity, pursuant to such authorities; (3) identify any lessons from the United Kingdom’s National Cybersecurity Center model to determine whether an integrated cyber center within the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency should be similarly organized into an unclassified environment and a classified environment; (4) recommend any changes to procedures and criteria for increasing and expanding the participation and integration of public- and private-sector personnel into Federal cyber defense and security efforts, including continuing limitations or hurdles in the security clearance program for private sector partners and integrating private sector partners into a Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency integrated cyber center; and (5) propose policies, programs, or practices that could overcome challenges identified in the aggregated information under subsection (b), including the creation of an integrated cyber center within the national cybersecurity and communications integration center, accompanied by legislative proposals, as appropriate. (d) Plan Upon submitting the report pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Director of National Intelligence, shall develop a plan to establish an integrated cyber center within the national cybersecurity and communications integration center. (e) Establishment Not later than one year after the submission of the report required under subsection (a), the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Director of National Intelligence, shall begin establishing an integrated cyber center in the national cybersecurity and communications integration center. (f) Annual updates Beginning one year after the submission of the report required under subsection (a) and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the relevant congressional committees updates regarding efforts to establish and operate an integrated cyber center in the national cybersecurity and communications integration center pursuant to subsection (e), including information on progress made toward overcoming any challenges identified in the report required by subsection (a). (g) Privacy review The Privacy Officers of the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense, the Department of Justice, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Director of National Intelligence shall review and provide to the relevant congressional committees comment, as appropriate, on each report and legislative proposal submitted under this section. (h) Definition In this section, the term relevant congressional committees (1) in the House of Representatives— (A) the Committee on Armed Services; (B) the Committee on the Judiciary; (C) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence; and (D) the Committee on Homeland Security; and (2) in the Senate— (A) the Committee on Armed Services; (B) the Committee on the Judiciary; (C) the Select Committee on Intelligence; and (D) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. 1631. Cyber threat information collaboration environment (a) In general In consultation with the Cyber Threat Data Standards and Interoperability Council established pursuant to subsection (d), the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence (acting through the Director of the National Security Agency), shall develop an information collaboration environment and associated analytic tools that enable entities to identify, mitigate, and prevent malicious cyber activity to— (1) provide limited access to appropriate operationally relevant data about cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity threats, including malware forensics and data from network sensor programs, on a platform that enables query and analysis; (2) allow such tools to be used in classified and unclassified environments drawing on classified and unclassified data sets; (3) enable cross-correlation of data on cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity threats at the speed and scale necessary for rapid detection and identification; (4) facilitate a comprehensive understanding of cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity threats; and (5) facilitate collaborative analysis between the Federal Government and private sector critical infrastructure entities and information and analysis organizations. (b) Implementation of information collaboration environment (1) Evaluation Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency of the Department of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence (acting through the Director of the National Security Agency), shall— (A) identify, inventory, and evaluate existing Federal sources of classified and unclassified information on cybersecurity threats; (B) evaluate current programs, applications, or platforms intended to detect, identify, analyze, and monitor cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity threats; and (C) coordinate with private sector critical infrastructure entities and, as determined appropriate by the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, other private sector entities, to identify private sector cyber threat capabilities, needs, and gaps. (2) Implementation Not later than one year after the evaluation required under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence (acting through the Director of the National Security Agency), shall begin implementation of the information collaboration environment developed pursuant to subsection (a) to enable participants in such environment to develop and run analytic tools referred to in such subsection on specified data sets for the purpose of identifying, mitigating, and preventing malicious cyber activity that is a threat to government and critical infrastructure. Such environment and use of such tools shall— (A) operate in a manner consistent with relevant privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties policies and protections, including such policies and protections established pursuant to section 1016 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 ( 6 U.S.C. 485 (B) account for appropriate data standards and interoperability requirements, consistent with the standards set forth in subsection (d); (C) enable integration of current applications, platforms, data, and information, including classified information, in a manner that supports integration of unclassified and classified information on cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity threats; (D) incorporate tools to manage access to classified and unclassified data, as appropriate; (E) ensure accessibility by entities the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence (acting through the Director of the National Security Agency), determines appropriate; (F) allow for access by critical infrastructure stakeholders and other private sector partners, at the discretion of the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense; (G) deploy analytic tools across classification levels to leverage all relevant data sets, as appropriate; (H) identify tools and analytical software that can be applied and shared to manipulate, transform, and display data and other identified needs; and (I) anticipate the integration of new technologies and data streams, including data from government-sponsored network sensors or network-monitoring programs deployed in support of State, local, Tribal, and territorial governments or private sector entities. (c) Annual review of impacts on privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties The Secretary of Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence (acting through the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the Director of the National Security Agency, respectively) shall direct the Privacy, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties Officers of their respective agencies, in consultation with Privacy, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties Officers of other Federal agencies participating in the information collaboration environment, to conduct an annual review of the information collaboration environment for compliance with fair information practices and civil rights and civil liberties policies. Each such report shall be— (1) unclassified, to the maximum extent possible, but may contain a non-public or classified annex to protect sources or methods and any other sensitive information restricted by Federal law; (2) with respect to the unclassified portions of each such report, made available on the public internet websites of the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence— (A) not later than 30 days after submission to the appropriate congressional committees; and (B) in an electronic format that is fully indexed and searchable; and (3) with respect to a classified annex, submitted to the appropriate congressional committees in an electronic format that is fully indexed and searchable. (d) Post-deployment assessment Not later than two years after the implementation of the information collaboration environment under subsection (b), the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of Defense, and the Director of National Intelligence (acting through the Director of the National Security Agency) shall jointly submit to te appropriate congressional committees an assessment of whether to include additional entities, including critical infrastructure information sharing and analysis organizations, in such environment. (e) Cyber Threat Data Standards and Interoperability Council (1) Establishment There is established an interagency council, to be known as the Cyber Threat Data Standards and Interoperability Council council (2) Other membership (A) Principal members In addition to the Secretary of Homeland Security, the council shall be composed of the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency of the Department of Homeland Security, the Secretary of Defense, and the Director of National Intelligence (acting through the Director of the National Security Agency). (B) Additional members The President shall identify and appoint council members from public and private sector entities who oversee programs that generate, collect, or disseminate data or information related to the detection, identification, analysis, and monitoring of cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity threats, based on recommendations submitted by the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of Defense, and the Director of National Intelligence (acting through the Director of the National Security Agency). (3) Data streams The council shall identify, designate, and periodically update programs that shall participate in or be interoperable with the information collaboration environment developed pursuant to subsection (a), which may include the following: (A) Network-monitoring and intrusion detection programs. (B) Cyber threat indicator sharing programs. (C) Certain government-sponsored network sensors or network-monitoring programs. (D) Incident response and cybersecurity technical assistance programs. (E) Malware forensics and reverse-engineering programs. (F) The defense industrial base threat intelligence program of the Department of Defense. (4) Data governance The council shall establish a committee comprised of the privacy officers of the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense, and the National Security Agency. Such committee shall establish procedures and data governance structures, as necessary, to protect sensitive data, comply with Federal regulations and statutes, and respect existing consent agreements with private sector critical infrastructure entities that apply to critical infrastructure information. (5) Recommendations The council shall, as appropriate, submit recommendations to the President to support the operation, adaptation, and security of the information collaboration environment developed pursuant to subsection (a). (f) No additional activities authorized Nothing in section may be construed to— (1) alter the responsibility of entities to follow guidelines issued pursuant to section 105(b) of the Cybersecurity Act of 2015 ( 6 U.S.C. 1504(b) Public Law 114–113 (2) authorize Federal or private entities to share information in a manner not already permitted by law. (g) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate congressional committees The term appropriate congressional committees (A) in the House of Representatives— (i) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence; (ii) the Committee on Homeland Security; (iii) the Committee on the Judiciary; and (iv) the Committee on Armed Services; and (B) in the Senate— (i) the Select Committee on Intelligence; (ii) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs; (iii) the Committee on the Judiciary; and (iv) the Committee on Armed Services. (2) Critical infrastructure The term critical infrastructure Public Law 107–56 42 U.S.C. 5195c(e) (3) Critical infrastructure information The term critical infrastructure information 6 U.S.C. 671 (4) Cyber threat indicator The term cyber threat indicator Public Law 114–113 6 U.S.C. 1501(6) (5) Cybersecurity risk The term cybersecurity risk 6 U.S.C. 659 (6) Cybersecurity threat The term cybersecurity threat Public Law 114–113 6 U.S.C. 1501(5) (7) Information sharing and analysis organization The term information sharing and analysis organization 6 U.S.C. 671 1632. Defense industrial base participation in a threat intelligence sharing program (a) Definition In this section, the term defense industrial base (b) Defense industrial base threat intelligence program (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall establish a threat intelligence program to share with and obtain from the defense industrial base information and intelligence on threats to national security. (2) Program requirements At a minimum, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure the threat intelligence sharing program established pursuant to paragraph (1) includes the following: (A) Cybersecurity incident reporting requirements that— (i) extend beyond current mandatory incident reporting requirements; (ii) set specific timeframes for all categories of such mandatory incident reporting; and (iii) create a single clearinghouse for all such mandatory incident reporting to the Department of Defense, including covered unclassified information, covered defense information, and classified information. (B) A mechanism for developing a shared and real-time picture of the threat environment. (C) Joint, collaborative, and co-located analytics. (D) Investments in technology and capabilities to support automated detection and analysis across the defense industrial base. (E) Coordinated intelligence sharing with relevant domestic law enforcement and counterintelligence agencies, in coordination, respectively, with the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Director of National Intelligence. (F) A process for direct sharing of threat intelligence related to a specific defense industrial base entity with such entity. (3) Existing information sharing programs The Secretary of Defense may utilize an existing Department of Defense information sharing program to satisfy the requirement under paragraph (1) if such existing program includes, or is modified to include, two-way sharing of threat information that is specifically relevant to the defense industrial base, including satisfying the requirements specified in paragraph (2). (4) Intelligence queries As part of a threat intelligence sharing program under this subsection, the Secretary of Defense shall require defense industrial base entities holding a Department of Defense contract to consent to queries of foreign intelligence collection databases related to such entity as a condition of such contract. (c) Threat intelligence program participation (1) Prohibition on procurement Beginning on the date that is than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense may not procure or acquire, or extend or renew a contract to procure or acquire, any item, equipment, system, or service from any entity that is not a participant in— (A) the threat intelligence sharing program established pursuant paragraph (1) of subsection (b); or (B) a comparably widely-utilized threat intelligence sharing program described in paragraph (3) of such subsection. (2) Application to subcontractors No entity holding a Department of Defense contract may subcontract any portion of such contract to another entity unless that second entity— (A) is a participant in a threat intelligence sharing program under this section; or (B) has received a waiver pursuant to subsection (d). (3) Implementation In implementing the prohibition under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense— (A) may create tiers of requirements and participation within the applicable threat intelligence sharing program referred to in such paragraph based on— (i) an evaluation of the role of and relative threats related to entities within the defense industrial base; and (ii) cybersecurity maturity model certification level; and (B) shall prioritize available funding and technical support to assist entities as is reasonably necessary for such entities to participate in a threat intelligence sharing program under this section. (d) Waiver authority (1) Waiver The Secretary of Defense may waive the prohibition under subsection (b)— (A) with respect to an entity or class of entities, if the Secretary determines that the requirement to participate in a threat intelligence sharing program under this section is unnecessary to protect the interests of the United States; or (B) at the request of an entity, if the Secretary determines there is compelling justification for such waiver. (2) Periodic reevaluation The Secretary of Defense shall periodically reevaluate any waiver issued pursuant to paragraph (1) and promptly revoke any waiver the Secretary determines is no longer warranted. (e) Regulations (1) Rulemaking authority Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall promulgate such rules and regulations as are necessary to carry out this section. (2) CMMC harmonization The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the threat intelligence sharing program requirements set forth in the rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to paragraph (1) consider an entity’s maturity and role within the defense industrial base, in accordance with the maturity certification levels established in the Department of Defense Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification program. 1633. Assistance for small manufacturers in the defense industrial supply chain on matters relating to cybersecurity (a) In general Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, may award financial assistance to a Center for the purpose of providing cybersecurity services to small manufacturers. (b) Criteria If the Secretary carries out subsection (a), the Secretary, in consultation with the Director, shall establish and publish on the grants.gov website, or successor website, criteria for selecting recipients for financial assistance under this section. (c) Use of financial assistance Financial assistance under this section— (1) shall be used by a Center to provide small manufacturers with cybersecurity services relating to— (A) compliance with the cybersecurity requirements of the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation, including awareness, assessment, evaluation, preparation, and implementation of cybersecurity services; and (B) achieving compliance with the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification framework of the Department of Defense; and (2) may be used by a Center to employ trained personnel to deliver cybersecurity services to small manufacturers. (d) Biennial reports (1) In general Not less frequently than once every two years, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives a biennial report on financial assistance awarded under this section. (2) Contents To the extent practicable, each report submitted under paragraph (1) shall include the following with respect to the years covered by the report: (A) The number of small manufacturing companies assisted. (B) A description of the cybersecurity services provided. (C) A description of the cybersecurity matters addressed. (D) An analysis of the operational effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the cybersecurity services provided. (e) Termination The authority of the Secretary to award of financial assistance under this section shall terminate on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act. (f) Definitions In this section: (1) The term Center 15 U.S.C. 278k(a) (2) The term small manufacturer Public Law 115–232 10 U.S.C. 2224 1634. Defense industrial base cybersecurity threat hunting and sensing, discovery, and mitigation (a) Definition In this section: (1) Defense industrial base The term defense industrial base (2) Advanced defense industrial base The term advanced defense industrial base (b) Defense industrial base cybersecurity threat hunting study (1) In general Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a study of the feasibility and resourcing required to establish the Defense Industrial Base Cybersecurity Threat Hunting Program (in this section referred to as the Program (2) Elements The study required under paragraph (1) shall— (A) establish the resources necessary, governance structures, and responsibility for execution of the Program, as well as any other relevant considerations determined by the Secretary; (B) include a conclusive determination of the Department of Defense’s capacity to establish the Program by the end of fiscal year 2021; and (C) identify any barriers that would prevent such establishment. (c) Defense industrial base cybersecurity threat hunting program (1) In general Upon a positive determination of the Program’s feasibility pursuant to the study required under subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall establish the Program to actively identify cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities within the information systems, including covered defense networks containing controlled unclassified information, of entities in the defense industrial base. (2) Program levels In establishing the Program in accordance with paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall develop a tiered program that takes into account the following: (A) The cybersecurity maturity of entities in the defense industrial base. (B) The role of such entities. (C) Whether each such entity possesses controlled unclassified information and covered defense networks. (D) The covered defense information to which such an entity has access as a result of contracts with the Department of Defense. (3) Program requirements The Program shall— (A) include requirements for mitigating any vulnerabilities identified pursuant to the Program; (B) provide a mechanism for the Department of Defense to share with entities in the defense industrial base malicious code, indicators of compromise, and insights on the evolving threat landscape; (C) provide incentives for entities in the defense industrial base to share with the Department of Defense, including the National Security Agency’s Cybersecurity Directorate, threat and vulnerability information collected pursuant to threat monitoring and hunt activities; and (D) mandate a minimum level of program participation for any entity that is part of the advanced defense industrial base. (d) Threat identification program participation (1) Prohibition on procurement If the Program is established pursuant to subsection (c), beginning on the date that is one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense may not procure or obtain, or extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain, any item, equipment, system, or service from any entity in the defense industrial base that is not in compliance with the requirements of the Program. (2) Implementation In implementing the prohibition under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall prioritize available funding and technical support to assist affected entities in the defense industrial base as is reasonably necessary for such affected entities to commence participation in the Program and satisfy Program requirements. (3) Waiver authority (A) Waiver The Secretary of Defense may waive the prohibition under paragraph (1)— (i) with respect to an entity or class of entities in the defense industrial base, if the Secretary determines that the requirement to participate in the Program is unnecessary to protect the interests of the United States; or (ii) at the request of such an entity, if the Secretary determines there is a compelling justification for such waiver. (B) Periodic reevaluation The Secretary of Defense shall periodically reevaluate any waiver issued pursuant to subparagraph (A) and revoke any such waiver the Secretary determines is no longer warranted. (e) Use of personnel and third-party threat hunting and sensing capabilities In carrying out the Program, the Secretary of Defense may— (1) utilize Department of Defense personnel to hunt for threats and vulnerabilities within the information systems of entities in the defense industrial base that have an active contract with Department of Defense; (2) certify third-party providers to hunt for threats and vulnerabilities on behalf of the Department of Defense; (3) require the deployment of network sensing technologies capable of identifying and filtering malicious network traffic; or (4) employ a combination of Department of Defense personnel and third-party providers and tools, as the Secretary determines necessary and appropriate, for the entity described in paragraph (1). (f) Regulations (1) Rulemaking authority Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall promulgate such rules and regulations as are necessary to carry out this section. (2) CMMC harmonization In promulgating rules and regulations pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall consider how best to integrate the requirements of this section with the Department of Defense Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification program. 1635. Defense Digital Service (a) Relationship with United States Digital Service Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Administrator of the United States Digital Service shall establish a direct relationship between the Department of Defense and the United States Digital Service to address authorities, hiring processes, roles, and responsibilities. (b) Certification Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Administrator of the United States Digital Service shall jointly certify to the congressional defense committees that the skills and qualifications of the Department of Defense personnel assigned to and supporting the core functions of the Defense Digital Service are consistent with the skills and qualifications United States Digital Service personnel. 1636. Limitation of funding for National Defense University Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2021 for the National Defense University, not more than 60 percent of such funds may be obligated or expended until the Joint Staff and the National Defense University present to the congressional defense committees the following: (1) A comprehensive plan for resourcing and growing the student population of the College of Information and Cyberspace, including by— (A) enrolling a minimum of 350 cyber workforce students per academic year; and (B) graduating a minimum of 42 students (including a minimum of 28 United States military students) in the Joint Professional Military Education Phase II War College 10- month resident program in fiscal year 2021, and implementing a plan to graduate a minimum of 70 students (including a minimum of 50 United States military and civilian students) in fiscal year 2023 and in each year thereafter through the Future Year Defense Program. (2) Budget documents for the Future Year Defense Program which show funding for the College of Information and Cyberspace to support the comprehensive plan described in subsection (a). (3) A comprehensive presentation of how programs of study on cyber-related matters are being expanded and integrated into Joint Professional Military Education at all National Defense University constituent colleges. D Nuclear forces 1641. Coordination in transfer of funds by Department of Defense to National Nuclear Security Administration (a) In general Section 179(f)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (D) The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy shall ensure that a transfer of estimated nuclear budget request authority is carried out in a manner that provides for coordination between the Secretary of Defense and the Administrator for Nuclear Security using appropriate interagency processes during the process in which the Secretaries develop the budget materials of the Department of Defense and the National Nuclear Security Administration, including by beginning such coordination by not later than June 30 for such budget materials that will be submitted during the following year. . (b) Reports Subparagraph (B) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new clause: (iv) A description of the total amount of the proposed estimated nuclear budget request authority to be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Secretary of Energy to support the weapons activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration, including— (A) identification of any trade-offs made within the budget of the Department of Defense as part of such proposed transfer; and (B) a certification made jointly by the Secretaries that such proposed transfer was developed in a manner that allowed for the coordination described in subparagraph (D). . 1642. Exercises of nuclear command, control, and communications system (a) Requirement Chapter 24 499b. Exercises of nuclear command, control, and communications system (a) Required exercises Except as provided by subsection (b), beginning 2021, the President shall participate in a large-scale exercise of the nuclear command, control, and communications system during the first year of each term of the President, and may participate in such additional exercises as the President determines appropriate. (b) Waiver The President may waive, on a case-by-case basis, the requirement to participate in an exercise under subsection (a) if the President— (1) determines that participating in such an exercise is infeasible by reason of a war declared by Congress, a national emergency declared by the President or Congress, a public health emergency declared by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act ( 42 U.S.C. 247d (2) submits to the congressional defense committees a notice of the waiver and a description of such determination. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 499b. Exercises of nuclear command, control, and communications system. . 1643. Independent studies on nuclear weapons programs of certain foreign states (a) Study Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct a study on the nuclear weapons programs of covered foreign countries. (b) Matters included The study under subsection (a) shall compile open-source data to conduct an analysis of the following for each covered foreign country: (1) The activities, budgets, and policy documents, regarding the nuclear weapons program. (2) The known research and development activities with respect to nuclear weapons. (3) The inventories of nuclear weapons and delivery vehicles with respect to both deployed and nondeployed weapons. (4) The capabilities of such nuclear weapons and delivery vehicles. (5) The physical sites used for nuclear processing, testing, and weapons integration. (6) The human capital of the scientific and technical workforce involved in nuclear programs, including with respect to matters relating to the education, knowledge, and technical capabilities of that workforce. (7) The known deployment areas for nuclear weapons. (8) Information with respect to the nuclear command and control system. (9) The factors and motivations driving the nuclear weapons program and the nuclear command and control system. (10) Any other information that the federally funded research and development center determines appropriate. (c) Submission to DOD Not later than 14 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, and each year thereafter for the following two years, the federally funded research and development center shall submit to the Secretary the study under subsection (a) and any updates to the study. (d) Submission to Congress Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary receives the study under subsection (a) or updates to the study, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees the study or such updates, without change. (e) Public release The federally funded research and development center shall maintain an internet website on which the center— (1) publishes the study under subsection (a) by not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary receives the study under subsection (c); and (2) provides on an ongoing basis commentaries, analyses, updates, and other information regarding the nuclear weapons of covered foreign countries. (f) Form The study under subsection (a) shall be in unclassified form. (g) Modification to report on nuclear forces of the United States and near-peer countries Section 1676 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (1) in subsection (a), by striking Not later than February 15, 2020, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence, shall Not later than February 15, 2020, and each year thereafter through 2023, the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly (2) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) With respect to the current and planned nuclear systems specified in paragraphs (1) through (3), the factors and motivations driving the development and deployment of the systems. . (h) Definitions In this section: (1) The term appropriate congressional committees (A) the congressional defense committees; (B) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives; and (C) the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. (2) The term covered foreign country (A) China. (B) North Korea. (C) Russia. (3) The term open-source data (A) Geospatial information. (B) Seismic sensors. (C) Commercial data. (D) Public government information. (E) Academic journals and conference proceedings. (F) Media reports. (G) Social media. E Missile Defense Programs 1651. Extension and modification of requirement for Comptroller General of the United States review and assessment of missile defense acquisition programs Section 232(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ( Public Law 112–81 Public Law 114–92 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking through 2020 through 2025 (2) in paragraph (2)— (A) by striking through 2021 through 2026 (B) by adding at the end the following new sentence: In carrying out this subsection, the Comptroller General shall review emergent issues relating to such programs and accountability and, in consultation with the congressional defense committees, either include any findings from the review in the reports submitted under this paragraph or provide to such committees a briefing on the findings. 1652. Extension of transition of ballistic missile defense programs to military departments Section 1676(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 10 U.S.C. 2431 2021 2023 1653. Development of hypersonic and ballistic missile tracking space sensor payload (a) Findings; sense of Congress (1) Findings Congress finds the following: (A) Subsection (d) of section 1683 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 10 U.S.C. 2431 Public Law 116–92 (B) The budget of the President for fiscal year 2021 submitted under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, did not provide any funding for the Missile Defense Agency to continue the development of such sensor payload. (2) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (A) regardless of the overall architecture for a missile defense tracking space layer, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency should remain the material developer for the hypersonic and ballistic tracking space sensor payload to ensure that— (i) unique hypersonic and ballistic missile tracking requirements are met; and (ii) the system can be integrated into the existing missile defense system command and control, battle management, and communications system; and (B) the Secretary of Defense should ensure transparency of funding for this effort to ensure proper oversight can be conducted on this critical capability. (b) Limitation Subsection (d) of section 1683 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 10 U.S.C. 2431 Public Law 116–92 (3) Limitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide, for the Space Defense Agency, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary submits the certification under paragraph (2)(B). . (c) Coordination Subsection (a) of such section is amended by striking the Commander of the Air Force Space Command and the Chief of Space Operations, the Commander of the United States Space Command, the Commander of the United States Northern Command, and 1654. Annual certification on hypersonic and ballistic missile tracking space sensor payload (a) Finding; sense of Congress (1) Finding Congress finds that the budget submitted by the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2021 does not fully fund an operational capability for the hypersonic and ballistic missile tracking space sensor within the tracking layer of the persistent space-based sensor architecture of the Space Development Agency, despite such space sensor being a requirement by the combatant commanders and being highlighted as a needed capability against both hypersonic and ballistic threats in the Missile Defense Review published in 2019. (2) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that the Missile Defense Agency hypersonic and ballistic missile tracking space sensor must be prioritized within the persistent space-based sensor architecture of the Space Development Agency to ensure the delivery of capabilities to the warfighter as soon as possible. (b) Annual certification Subsection (d) of section 1683 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 10 U.S.C. 2431 (4) Annual certification On an annual basis until the date on which the hypersonic and ballistic tracking space sensor payload achieves full operational capability, the Secretary of Defense, without delegation, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a certification that— (A) the most recent future-years defense program submitted under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, includes estimated expenditures and proposed appropriations in amounts necessary to ensure the development and deployment of such space sensor payload as a component of the sensor architecture developed under subsection (a); and (B) the Commander of the United States Space Command has validated both the ballistic and hypersonic tracking requirements of, and the timeline to deploy, such space sensor payload. . 1655. Alignment of the Missile Defense Agency within the Department of Defense (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Since the Missile Defense Agency was aligned to be under the authority, direction, and control of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering pursuant to section 205(b) of title 10, United States Code, the advanced technology development budget requests in the defense budget materials (as defined in section 231(f) of title 10, United States Code) have decreased by more than 650 percent, from a request for $292,000,000 for fiscal year 2018 (the highest such request) to a request for $45,000,000 for fiscal year 2021. (2) The overwhelming majority of the budget of the Missile Defense Agency is invested in programs that would be categorized as acquisition category 1 efforts if such programs were administered under the acquisition standards under Department of Defense Directive 5000. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that, in light of the findings under subsection (a), upon the completion of the independent review of the organization of the Missile Defense Agency required by section 1688 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (c) Report Not later than February 28, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the alignment of the Missile Defense Agency within the Department of Defense. The report shall include— (1) a description of the risks and benefits of both— (A) continuing the alignment of the Agency under the authority, direction, and control of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering pursuant to section 205(b) of title 10, United States Code; and (B) realigning the Agency to be under the authority, direction, and control of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment; and (2) if the Agency were to be realigned, the actions that would need to be taken to realign the Agency to be under the authority, direction, and control of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment or another element of the Department of Defense. 1656. Analysis of alternatives for homeland missile defense missions (a) Analysis of alternatives (1) Requirement Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, in coordination with the Secretary of the Navy, the Secretary of the Army, and the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, shall conduct an analysis of alternatives with respect to a complete architecture for using the regional terminal high altitude area defense system and the Aegis ballistic missile defense system to conduct homeland defense missions. (2) Scope The analysis of alternatives under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) The sensors needed for the architecture described in such paragraph. (B) An assessment of the locations of each system included in the analysis to provide similar coverage as the ground-based midcourse defense system, including, with respect to such systems that are land-based, by giving preference to locations with completed environmental impact analyses conducted pursuant to section 227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112– 239; 126 Stat. 1678), to the extent practicable. (C) The acquisition objectives for interceptors of the terminal high altitude area defense system and standard missile–3 interceptors for homeland defense purposes. (D) Any improvements needed to the missile defense system command and control, battle management, and communications system. (E) The manning, training, and sustainment needed to support such architecture. (F) A detailed schedule for the development, testing, production, and deployment of such systems. (G) A lifecycle cost estimate of such architecture. (H) A comparison of the capabilities, costs, schedules, and policies with respect to— (i) deploying regional systems described in subsection (a) to conduct homeland defense missions; and (ii) deploying future ground-based midcourse defense systems for such missions. (3) Submission Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing— (A) the analysis of alternatives under paragraph (1); and (B) a certification by the Secretary that such analysis is sufficient. (b) Assessment Not later than February 28, 2021, the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the head of any other element of the intelligence community that the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate, shall submit to the congressional defense committees an assessment of the following: (1) How the development and deployment of regional terminal high altitude area defense systems and Aegis ballistic missile defense systems to conduct longer-range missile defense missions would be perceived by near-peer foreign countries and rogue nations. (2) How such near-peer foreign countries and rogue nations would likely respond to such deployments. 1657. Next generation interceptors (a) Notification of changed requirements During the acquisition and development process of the next generation interceptor program, not later than seven days after the date on which any changes are made to the requirements for such program that are established in the equivalent to capability development documentation, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall notify the congressional defense committees of such changes. (b) Briefing on contract Not later than 14 days after the date on which the Director awards a contract for the next generation interceptor, the Director shall provide the congressional defense committees a briefing on such contract, including with respect to the cost, schedule, performance, and requirements of the contract. (c) Report on ground-based midcourse defense system (1) Requirement Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, and the Commander of the United States Northern Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the ground-based midcourse defense system. (2) Matters included The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An explanation of how contracts in existence as of the date of the report could be used to reestablish improvements and sustainment for kill vehicles and boosters for the ground-based midcourse defense system. (B) An explanation of how such system could be improved through service life extensions or pre-planned product improvements to address some of the requirements of the next generation interceptor by 2026, including an identification of the costs, schedule, and any risks. (C) A description of the costs and schedule with respect to restarting booster production to field 20 additional interceptors by 2026. (D) An analysis of policy implications with respect to the requirements for the ground-based midcourse defense system. 1658. Oversight of next generation interceptor program (a) Findings; sense of Congress (1) Findings Congress finds that the Secretary of Defense discovered major technical problems with the redesigned kill vehicle program, which led to cancelling the program in August 2019 and caused significant delays to the improved defense of the United States against rogue nation ballistic missile threats and wasted $1,200,000,000. (2) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should ensure robust oversight and accountability for the acquisition of the future next generation interceptor program to avoid making the same errors that were experienced in the redesigned kill vehicle effort. (b) Independent cost assessment and validation (1) Assessment The Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall conduct an independent cost assessment of the next generation interceptor program. (2) Validation The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall validate the preliminary cost assessment conducted under paragraph (1) that will be used to inform the award of the contract for the next generation interceptor. (3) Submission Not later than the date on which the Director of the Missile Defense Agency awards a contract for the next generation interceptor, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the preliminary independent cost assessment under paragraph (1) and the validation under paragraph (2). (c) Flight tests In addition to the requirements of section 2399 of title 10, United States Code, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency may not make any decision regarding the initial production, or equivalent, of the next generation interceptor unless the Director has— (1) certified to the congressional defense committees that the Director has conducted not fewer than two successful intercept flight tests of the next generation interceptor; and (2) provided to such committees a briefing on the details of such tests, including with respect to the operational realism of such tests. 1659. Missile defense cooperation between the United States and Israel (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the strong and enduring relationship between the United States and Israel is in the national security interest of both countries; (2) the memorandum of understanding signed by the United States and Israel on September 14, 2016, including the provisions of the memorandum relating to missile and rocket defense cooperation, continues to be a critical component of the bilateral relationship; (3) the United States and Israel should continue government-to-government collaboration and information sharing of technical data to investigate the potential operational use of Israeli missile defense systems for United States purposes; and (4) in addition to the existing Israeli missile defense interceptor systems, there is potential for developing and incorporating directed energy platforms to assist the missile defense capabilities of both the United States and Israel. (b) Cooperation The Secretary of Defense may seek to extend existing cooperation with Israel to carry out, on a joint basis with Israel, research, development, test, and evaluation activities to establish directed energy capabilities that address missile threats to the United States, the deployed members of the Armed Forces of the United States, or Israel. The Secretary shall ensure that any such activities are conducted— (1) in accordance with Federal law and the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons which may be deemed to be Excessively Injurious or to have Indiscriminate Effects, signed at Geneva October 10, 1980; and (2) in a manner that appropriately protects sensitive information and the national security interests of the United States and the national security interests of Israel. 1660. Report on defense of Guam from integrated air and missile threats (a) Report Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing a study on the defense of Guam from integrated air and missile threats, including such threats from ballistic, hypersonic, and cruise missiles. (b) Elements The report under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) The identification of existing deployed land- and sea-based air and missile defense programs of record within the military departments and Defense Agencies, including with respect to interceptors, radars, and ground-, ship-, air,- and space-based sensors that could be used either alone or in coordination with other systems to counter the threats specified in subsection (a) with an initial operational capability by 2025. (2) A plan of how such programs would be used to counter such threats with an initial operational capability by 2025. (3) A plan of which programs currently in development but not yet deployed could enhance or substitute for existing programs in countering such threats with an initial operational capability by 2025. (4) An analysis of which military department, Defense Agency, or combatant command would have operational control of the mission to counter such threats. (5) A cost analysis of the various options described in paragraphs (1) and (3), including a breakdown of the cost of weapons systems considered under the various scenarios (including any costs to modify the systems), the cost benefits gained through economies of scale, and the cost of any military construction required. (6) An analysis of the policy implications regarding deploying additional missile defense systems on Guam, and how such deployments could affect strategic stability, including likely responses from both rogue nations and near-peer competitors. (c) Consultation The Secretary shall carry out this section in consultation with each of the following: (1) The Director of the Missile Defense Agency. (2) The Commander of the United States Indo-Pacific Command. (3) The Commander of the United States Northern Command. (4) Any other official whom the Secretary of Defense determines for purposes of this section has significant technical, policy, or military expertise. (d) Form The report submitted under subsection (a) shall be in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. (e) Briefing Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees the report under subsection (a), the Secretary shall provide to such committees a briefing on the report. 1661. Report on cruise missile defense Not later than January 15, 2021, the Commander of the United States Northern Command, in coordination with the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing— (1) an identification of any vulnerability of the contiguous United States to known cruise missile threats; and (2) a plan to mitigate any such vulnerability. F Other Matters 1671. Conventional prompt global strike (a) Integration Section 1697(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 The Secretary shall initiate such transfer of technologies to DDG–1000 class destroyers by not later than January 1, 2021. (b) Report on strategic hypersonic weapons (1) Requirement Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on strategic hypersonic weapons. (2) Matters included The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A discussion of the authority to use strategic hypersonic weapons and if, and how, such authorities would be delegated to the commanders of the combatant commands or to the Chiefs of the Armed Forces. (B) An assessment of escalation and miscalculation risks (including the risk that adversaries may detect initial launch but not reliably detect the entire boost-glide trajectory), how such risks will be addressed and minimized with regards to the use of strategic hypersonic weapons, and whether any risk escalation exercises have been conducted or are planned for the potential use of hypersonic weapons. (C) A description of any updates needed to war plans with the introduction of strategic hypersonic weapons. (D) Identification of the element of the Department of Defense that has responsibility for establishing targeting requirements for strategic hypersonic weapons. (E) A description of how the requirements for land- and sea-based strategic hypersonic weapons will be addressed with the Joint Requirements Oversight Council, and how such requirements will be formally provided to the military departments procuring such weapons through an acquisition program described under section 804 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( 10 U.S.C. 2302 (F) A basing strategy for land-based launch platforms and a description of the actions needed to be taken for future deployment of such platforms. (3) Form The report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (c) Annual reports on acquisition (1) Army and Navy programs Except as provided by paragraph (3), not later than 30 days after the date on which the budget of the President for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2025 is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Navy shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the conventional prompt global strike programs of the Army and the Navy, including— (A) the total costs to the respective military departments for such programs; (B) the strategy for such programs with respect to manning, training, and equipping, including cost estimates; and (C) a testing strategy and schedule for such programs. (2) Certifications Not later than 60 days after the date on which the budget of the President for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2025 is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall submit to the congressional defense committees a certification regarding the sufficiency, including any anomalies, with respect to— (A) the total program costs of the conventional prompt global strike programs of the Army and the Navy; and (B) the testing strategy for such programs. (3) Termination The requirement to submit a report under paragraph (1) shall terminate on the date on which the Secretary of Defense determines that the conventional prompt global strike programs of the Army and the Navy are unable to be acquired under the authority of section 804 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( 10 U.S.C. 2302 1672. Submission of reports under Missile Defense Review and Nuclear Posture Review Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees— (1) each report produced by the Department of Defense pursuant to the Missile Defense Review published in 2019; and (2) each report produced by the Department pursuant to the Nuclear Posture Review published in 2018. 1673. Report on consideration of risks of inadvertent escalation to nuclear war (a) Report Not later than January 31, 2021, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report— (1) detailing the efforts of the Department of Defense with respect to developing and implementing guidance to ensure that the risks of inadvertent escalation to a nuclear war are considered within the decision-making processes of the Department regarding relevant activities (such as developing contingency plans, managing military crises and conflicts, and supporting the Department of State in the development, negotiation, and implementation of cooperative risk-reduction measures); and (2) identifying the capabilities and factors taken into account in developing such guidance. (b) Form The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (c) Briefing Not later than December 1, 2020, the Under Secretary shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a briefing on the progress and findings made in carrying out subsection (a). XVII Reports and Other Matters A Studies and Reports 1701. Review of support of special operations to combat terrorism (a) Review The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a review of all support provided, or planned to be provided, under section 127e of title 10, United States Code. Such review shall include an analysis of each of the following: (1) The strategic alignment between such support and relevant Executive Orders, global campaign plans, theatre campaign plans, execute orders, and other guiding documents for currency, relevancy, and efficacy. (2) The extent to which United States Special Operations Command has the processes and procedures to manage, integrate, and synchronize the authority under section 127e of title 10, United States Code, in support of the objectives and priorities specified by the documents listed in (a)(1) as well as the objectives and priorities of— (A) the geographic combatant commands; (B) theatre elements of United States Special Operations Command; (C) relevant chiefs of mission and other appropriate positions in the Department of State; and (D) any other interagency organization affected by the use of such authority. (3) For the activities carried out pursuant to such authority, the extent to which United States Special Operations Command has the processes and procedures to— (A) determine the professionalism, cohesion, and institutional capacity of the military in the country where forces receiving support are based; (B) determine the adherence of the forces receiving support to human rights norms and the laws of armed conflict; (C) establish measures of effectiveness; (D) assess such activities against established measures of effectiveness as identified in subparagraph (C); (E) establish criteria to determine the successful completion of such activities; (F) deconflict and synchronize activities conducted under such authority with other relevant funding authorities; (G) deconflict and synchronize activities conducted under such authorities with other relevant activities conducted by organizations related to, but outside the purview of, the Department of Defense; and (H) track the training, support, and facilitation provided to forces receiving support, and the significant activities undertaken by such forces as a result of such training, support, and facilitation. (4) The extent to which United States Special Operations Command has processes and procedures to manage the sunset, termination, or transition of activities carried out pursuant to such authority, including— (A) accountability with respect to equipment provided; and (B) integrity of the tactics, techniques, and procedures developed. (5) The extent to which United States Special Operations Command has and uses processes and procedures to— (A) report to Congress biannually on the matters referred to in paragraph (3); and (B) notify Congress with respect to the intent to sunset, terminate, or transition activities carried out pursuant to such authority. (6) Any other issues the Comptroller General determines appropriate with respect to the authority under section 127e of title 10, United States Code. (b) Briefing Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall provide for the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a briefing on the progress of the review required under subsection (a). (c) Report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on the findings of the review required under subsection (a) and the recommendations of the Comptroller General pursuant to such review. (d) Support defined In this section, the term support (1) personnel who provide capacity for— (A) training and equipment; (B) training, advice, and assistance; or (C) advice, assistance, and accompaniment capacity; (2) financial assistance; and (3) equipment and weapons. 1702. FFRDC study of explosive ordnance disposal agencies (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development corporation under which such corporation shall conduct a study of the responsibilities, authorities, policies, programs, resources, organization, and activities of the explosive ordnance disposal agencies of the Department of Defense, Defense Agencies, and military departments. (b) Elements of study The study conducted under subsection (a) shall include, for the Department of Defense, each Defense Agency, and each the military departments, each of the following: (1) An identification and evaluation of— (A) technology research, development, and acquisition activities related to explosive ordnance disposal, including an identification and evaluation of— (i) current and future technology and related industrial base gaps; and (ii) any technical or operational risks associated with such technology or related industrial base gaps; (B) recruiting, training, education, assignment, promotion, and retention of military and civilian personnel with responsibilities relating to explosive ordnance disposal; (C) administrative and operational force structure with respect to explosive ordnance disposal, including an identification and assessment of risk associated with force structure capacity or capability gaps, if any; and (D) the demand for, and activities conducted in support of, domestic and international military explosive ordnance disposal operations, including— (i) support provided to Department of Defense agencies and other Federal agencies; and (ii) an identification and assessment of risk associated with the prioritization and availability of explosive ordnance disposal support among supported agencies and operations. (2) Recommendations, if any, for changes to— (A) the organization and distribution of responsibilities and authorities relating to explosive ordnance disposal; (B) the explosive ordnance disposal force structure, management, prioritization, and operating concepts in support of the explosive ordnance disposal requirements of the Armed Forces and other Federal agencies; and (C) resource investment strategies and technology prioritization for explosive ordnance disposal, including science and technology, prototyping, experimentation, test and evaluation, and related five-year funding profiles. (c) Report to Congress (1) In general Not later than August 31, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the study conducted under subsection (a). Such report shall include the comments on the study, if any, of the Secretary of Defense, the directors of each of the Defense Agencies, and the Secretaries of each of the military departments. (2) Form of report The report submitted under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. 1703. Report on the Human Rights Office at United States Southern Command (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the promotion of human rights and the protection of civilians abroad is an ethical, legal, and strategic interest of the United States; (2) the Human Rights Office at the United States Southern Command plays an essential role in the promotion of human rights and the professionalization of foreign security forces in the area of responsibility of the United States Southern Command; (3) the Secretary of Defense should ensure the status of the Human Rights Office at the United States Southern Command and, to the extent possible, ensure the United States Southern Command has the assets necessary to support the activities of the Human Rights Office; and (4) the Secretary of Defense should ensure the development, at each of the combatant commands, of an office responsible for— (A) advising the commander of the combatant command on the promotion of human rights and protection of civilians; and (B) integrating such promotion and protection into command strategy. (b) Report Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on— (1) the activities of the Human Rights Office at the United States Southern Command to provide and promote— (A) analysis and policy support to the Commander of the United States Southern Command regarding human rights and the protection of civilians; (B) education of employees of the Department of Defense regarding human rights and protection of civilians pursuant to the document promulgated by the United States Southern Command on July 1, 1998, titled Regulation 1-20 (C) integration of the promotion of human rights and protection of civilians into the strategy, planning, training, and exercises of the United States Southern Command, including into programs of the armed forces of partner countries through the Human Rights Initiative program of such Command; (D) promotion of human rights and the protection of civilians through security cooperation activities; (E) implementation of section 362 of title 10, United States Code; and (F) countering trafficking in persons; and (2) the resources necessary over the period of the future years defense plan for fiscal year 2022 under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, for the United States Southern Command to support the activities of the Human Rights Office at such Command. (c) Form The report under subsection (b) shall be submitted in unclassified form. 1704. Report on joint training range exercises for the Pacific region (a) Report Not later than March 15, 2021, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the Commander of United States Indo-Pacific Command, the Secretary of the Army, the Secretary of the Navy, and the Secretary of the Air Force, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing a plan to integrate combined, joint, and multi-domain, training and experimentation in the Pacific region, including existing ranges, training areas, and test facilities, to achieve the following objectives: (1) Support future combined and joint exercises and training to test operational capabilities and weapon systems. (2) Employ multi-domain training to validate joint operational concepts. (3) Integrate allied and partner countries into national-level exercises. (b) Matters The report under subsection (a) shall address the following: (1) Integration of cyber, space, and electromagnetic spectrum domains. (2) Mobile and fixed range instrumentation packages for experimentation and training. (3) Digital, integrated command and control for air defense systems. (4) Command, control, communications, computer, and information (C41) systems. (5) War gaming, modeling, and simulations packages. (6) Intelligence support systems. (7) Manpower management, execution, collection, and analysis required for the incorporation of space and cyber activities into the training range exercise plan contained in such report. (8) Connectivity requirements to support all domain integration and training. (9) Any training range upgrades or infrastructure improvements necessary to integrate legacy training and exercise facilities into integrated, operational sites. (10) Exercises led by the United States Indo-Pacific Command, within the area of operations of the Command, that integrate allied and partnered countries and link to the national-level exercises of the United States. (11) Incorporation of any other functional and geographic combatant commands required to support the United States Indo-Pacific Command. (c) Form The report under subsection (a) may be submitted in classified form, and shall include an unclassified summary. 1705. Study on Chinese policies and influence in the development of international standards for emerging technologies (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall enter into an agreement with an appropriate non-governmental entity with relevant expertise, as determined by the Director, to conduct a study and make recommendations with respect to the impact of the policies of the People’s Republic of China and coordination among industrial entities within the People’s Republic of China on international bodies engaged in developing and setting international standards for emerging technologies. The study may include— (1) an assessment of how the role of the People’s Republic of China in international standards setting organizations has grown over the previous 10 years, including in leadership roles in standards-drafting technical committees, and the quality or value of that participation; (2) an assessment of the impact of the standardization strategy of the People’s Republic of China, as identified in the Chinese Standard 2035 (3) an examination of whether international standards for select emerging technologies are being designed to promote interests of the People’s Republic of China that are expressed in the Made in China 2025 (4) an examination of how the previous practices that the People’s Republic of China has utilized while participating in international standards setting organizations may foretell how the People’s Republic of China will engage in international standardization activities of critical technologies like artificial intelligence and quantum information science, and what may be the consequences; (5) recommendations on how the United States can take steps to mitigate influence of the People’s Republic of China and bolster United States public and private sector participation in international standards-setting bodies; and (6) any other areas the Director, in consultation with the entity selected to conduct the study, believes is important to address. (b) Report to congress The agreement entered into under subsection (a) shall require the entity conducting the study to, not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act— (1) submit to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report containing the findings and recommendations of the review conducted under subsection (a); and (2) make a copy of such report available on a publicly accessible website. B Electronic Message Preservation 1711. Short title This subtitle may be cited as the Electronic Message Preservation Act 1712. Preservation of electronic messages and other records (a) Requirement for Preservation of Electronic Messages Chapter 29 2912. Preservation of electronic messages and other records (a) Regulations required The Archivist shall promulgate regulations governing Federal agency preservation of electronic messages that are determined to be records. Such regulations shall, at a minimum— (1) require the electronic capture, management, and preservation of such electronic records in accordance with the records disposition requirements of chapter 33; (2) require that such electronic records are readily accessible for retrieval through electronic searches; and (3) include timelines for Federal agency implementation of the regulations that ensure compliance as expeditiously as practicable. (b) Ensuring compliance The Archivist shall promulgate regulations that— (1) establish mandatory minimum functional requirements for electronic records management systems to ensure compliance with the requirements in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a); and (2) establish a process to ensure that the electronic records management system of each Federal agency meets the functional requirements established under paragraph (1). (c) Coverage of other electronic records To the extent practicable, the regulations promulgated under subsections (a) and (b) shall also include requirements for the capture, management, and preservation of other electronic records. (d) Compliance by Federal agencies Each Federal agency shall comply with the regulations promulgated under subsections (a) and (b). (e) Review of regulations required The Archivist shall periodically review and, as necessary, amend the regulations promulgated under subsections (a) and (b). . (b) Deadline for regulations (1) Preservation of electronic messages Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Archivist shall promulgate the regulations required under section 2912(a) of title 44, United States Code, as added by subsection (a). (2) Ensuring compliance Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Archivist shall promulgate the regulations required under section 2912(b) of title 44, United States Code, as added by subsection (a). (c) Reports on implementation of regulations (1) Agency report to Archivist Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the head of each Federal agency shall submit to the Archivist a report on the agency’s compliance with the regulations promulgated under section 2912 of title 44, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), and shall make the report publicly available on the website of the agency. (2) Archivist report to Congress Not later than 90 days after receipt of all reports required by paragraph (1), the Archivist shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the House of Representatives a report on Federal agency compliance with the regulations promulgated under section 2912(a) of title 44, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), and shall make the report publicly available on the website of the agency. (3) Federal agency defined In this subsection, the term Federal agency (d) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 29 2912. Preservation of electronic messages and other records. . (e) Definitions Section 2901 of title 44, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking and (2) by striking paragraph (15) and inserting the following new paragraphs: (15) the term electronic messages (16) the term electronic records management system (A) categorizing and locating records; (B) ensuring that records are retained as long as necessary; (C) identifying records that are due for disposition; and (D) ensuring the storage, retrieval, and disposition of records. . 1713. Presidential records (a) Additional Regulations Relating to Presidential Records (1) In general Section 2206 of title 44, United States Code, is amended— (A) by striking and (B) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (4) and inserting ; and (C) by adding at the end the following: (5) provisions for establishing standards necessary for the economical and efficient management of electronic Presidential records during the President’s term of office, including— (A) records management controls necessary for the capture, management, and preservation of electronic messages; (B) records management controls necessary to ensure that electronic messages are readily accessible for retrieval through electronic searches; and (C) a process to ensure the electronic records management system to be used by the President for the purposes of complying with the requirements in subparagraphs (A) and (B). . (2) Definitions Section 2201 of title 44, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (6) The term electronic messages (7) The term electronic records management system . (b) Certification of President’s Management of Presidential Records (1) Certification required Chapter 22 2210. Certification of the President’s management of Presidential records (a) Annual Certification The Archivist shall annually certify whether the electronic records management controls established by the President meet requirements under sections 2203(a) and 2206(5). (b) Report to Congress The Archivist shall report annually to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the House of Representatives on the status of the certification. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 22 2210. Certification of the President’s management of Presidential records. . (c) Report to Congress Section 2203(g) of title 44, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (5) One year following the conclusion of a President’s term of office, or if a President serves consecutive terms 1 year following the conclusion of the last term, the Archivist shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the House of Representatives a report on— (A) the volume and format of electronic Presidential records deposited into that President’s Presidential archival depository; and (B) whether the electronic records management controls of that President met the requirements under sections 2203(a) and 2206(5). . (d) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act. C Space Technology Advancement Report (STAR) Act of 2020 1721. Short title This subtitle may be cited as the Space Technology Advancement Report (STAR) Act of 2020 1722. Findings Congress finds the following: (1) As stated in the United States-China Economic and Security Commission’s 2019 Report to Congress, the United States retains many advantages over the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in space, including— (A) the organization and technical expertise of its space program; (B) the capabilities of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for human spaceflight and exploration; (C) its vibrant commercial space sector; (D) its long history of space leadership; and (E) many international partnerships. (2) The PRC seeks to establish a leading position in the economic and military use of outer space and views space as critical to its future security and economic interests. (3) The PRC’s national-level commitment to establishing itself as a global space leader harms United States interests and threatens to undermine many of the advantages the United States has worked so long to establish. (4) For over 60 years, the United States has led the world in space exploration and human space flight through a robust national program that ensures NASA develops and maintains critical spaceflight systems to enable this leadership, including the Apollo program’s Saturn V rocket, the Space Shuttle, the International Space Station and the Space Launch System and Orion today. (5) The Defense Intelligence Agency noted in its 2019 Challenges to U.S. Security in Space (6) The United States space program and commercial space sector risks being hollowed out by the PRC’s plans to attain leadership in key technologies. (7) It is in the economic and security interest of the United States to remain the global leader in space power. (8) A recent report by the Air Force Research Laboratory and the Defense Innovation Unit found that China’s strategy to bolster its domestic space industry includes a global program of theft and other misappropriation of intellectual property, direct integration of state-owned entities and their technology with commercial start-ups, the use of front companies to invest in United States space companies, vertical control of supply chains, and predatory pricing. (9) The United States Congress passed the Wolf Amendment as part of the Fiscal Year 2012 Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act ( Public Law 112–55 1723. Report; strategy (a) Report (1) In general Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, and annually thereafter in fiscal years 2022 and 2023, the National Space Council shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees an interagency assessment of the ability of the United States to compete with foreign space programs and in the emerging commercial space economy. (2) Content of report The report shall include information on the following: (A) An assessment of the human exploration and spaceflight capabilities of the national space program of the United States relative to national programs of the PRC. (B) An assessment of— (i) the viability of extraction of space-based precious minerals, onsite exploitation of space-based natural resources, and utilization of space-based solar power; (ii) the programs of the United States and the PRC that are related to the issues described in clause (i); and (iii) any potential terrestrial or space environmental impacts of space-based solar power. (C) An assessment of United States strategic interests in or related to cislunar space. (D) A comparative assessment of future United States space launch capabilities and those of the PRC. (E) The extent of foreign investment in the commercial space sector of the United States, especially in venture capital and other private equity investments that seek to work with the Federal government. (F) The steps by which the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Department of Defense, and other United States Federal agencies conduct the necessary due diligence and security reviews prior to investing in private space entities that may have received funding from foreign investment. (G) Current steps that the United States is taking to identify and help mitigate threats to domestic space industry from influence of the PRC. (H) An assessment of the current ability, role, costs, and authorities of the Department of Defense to mitigate the threats of commercial communications and navigation in space from the PRC’s growing counterspace capabilities, and any actions required to improve this capability. (I) An assessment of how the PRC’s activities are impacting United States national security, including— (i) theft by the PRC of United States intellectual property through technology transfer requirements or otherwise; and (ii) efforts of the PRC to seize control of critical elements of the United States space industry supply chain and United States space industry companies or sister companies with shared leadership; and government cybersecurity capabilities. (J) An assessment of efforts of the PRC to pursue cooperative agreements with other nations to advance space development. (K) Recommendations to Congress, including recommendations with respect to— (i) any legislative proposals to address threats by the PRC to the United States national space programs as well as domestic commercial launch and satellite industries; (ii) how the United States Government can best utilize existing Federal entities to investigate and prevent potentially harmful investment by the PRC in the United States commercial space industry; (3) Form The report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (b) Strategy (1) In general Not later than 1 year after the submission of the report required in subsection (a), the President, in consultation with the National Space Council, shall develop and submit to the appropriate congressional committees a strategy to ensure the United States can— (A) compete with other national space programs; (B) maintain leadership in the emerging commercial space economy; (C) identify market, regulatory, and other means to address unfair competition from the PRC based on the findings of in the report required in subsection (a); (D) leverage commercial space capabilities to ensure United States national security and the security of United States interests in space; (E) protect United States supply chains and manufacturing critical to competitiveness in space; and (F) coordinate with international allies and partners in space. (3) Form The strategy required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (c) Definitions In this section, the following definitions apply: (1) Appropriate congressional committees of congress The term appropriate congressional committees (A) the Committee on Armed services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives. (2) PRC The term PRC People’s Republic of China D AMBER Alert Nationwide 1731. Cooperation with Department of Homeland Security Subtitle A of title III of the PROTECT Act ( 34 U.S.C. 20501 (1) in section 301— (A) in subsection (b)— (i) in paragraph (1), by inserting (including airports, maritime ports, border crossing areas and checkpoints, and ports of exit from the United States) gaps in areas of interstate travel (ii) in paragraphs (2) and (3), by inserting , territories of the United States, and tribal governments States (B) in subsection (d), by inserting , the Secretary of Homeland Security, Secretary of Transportation (2) in section 302— (A) in subsection (b), in paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) by inserting , territorial, tribal, State (B) in subsection (c)— (i) in paragraph (1), by inserting , the Secretary of Homeland Security, Secretary of Transportation (ii) in paragraph (2), by inserting , territorial, tribal, State 1732. AMBER Alerts along major transportation routes (a) In general Section 303 of the PROTECT Act ( 34 U.S.C. 20503 (1) in the section heading, by inserting and major transportation routes along highways (2) in subsection (a)— (A) by inserting (referred to in this section as the Secretary Secretary of Transportation (B) by inserting and at airports, maritime ports, border crossing areas and checkpoints, and ports of exit from the United States along highways (3) in subsection (b)— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) by striking other motorist information systems to notify motorists other information systems to notify motorists, aircraft passengers, ship passengers, and travelers (ii) by inserting , aircraft passengers, ship passengers, and travelers necessary to notify motorists (B) in paragraph (2)— (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking other motorist information systems to notify motorists other information systems to notify motorists, aircraft passengers, ship passengers, and travelers (ii) in subparagraph (D), by inserting , aircraft passengers, ship passengers, and travelers support the notification of motorists (iii) in subparagraph (E), by inserting , aircraft passengers, ship passengers, and travelers motorists (iv) in subparagraph (F), by inserting , aircraft passengers, ship passengers, and travelers motorists (v) in subparagraph (G), by inserting , aircraft passengers, ship passengers, and travelers motorists (4) in subsection (c), by striking other motorist information systems to notify motorists other information systems to notify motorists, aircraft passengers, ship passengers, and travelers (5) by amending subsection (d) to read as follows: (d) Federal share (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Federal share of the cost of any activities funded by a grant under this section may not exceed 80 percent. (2) Waiver If the Secretary determines that American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, or the Virgin Islands of the United States is unable to comply with the requirement under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall waive such requirement. ; (6) in subsection (g)— (A) by striking In this section In this subtitle (B) by striking or Puerto Rico American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, the Virgin Islands of the United States, and any other territory of the United States (7) in subsection (h), by striking fiscal year 2004 each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023 (b) Technical and conforming amendment The table of contents in section 1(b) of the PROTECT Act ( Public Law 108–21 Sec. 303. Grant program for notification and communications systems along highways and major transportation routes for recovery of abducted children. . 1733. AMBER Alert communication plans in the territories Section 304 of the PROTECT Act ( 34 U.S.C. 20504 (1) in subsection (b)(4), by inserting a territorial government or with (2) by amending subsection (c) to read as follows: (c) Federal share (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Federal share of the cost of any activities funded by a grant under this section may not exceed 50 percent. (2) Waiver If the Attorney General determines that American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands of the United States, or an Indian tribe is unable to comply with the requirement under paragraph (1), the Attorney General shall waive such requirement. ; and (3) in subsection (d), by inserting , including territories of the United States 1734. Government Accountability Office report (a) In general Not later than 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall conduct a study assessing— (1) the implementation of the amendments made by this Act; (2) any challenges related to integrating the territories of the United States into the AMBER Alert system; (3) the readiness, educational, technological, and training needs of territorial law enforcement agencies in responding to cases involving missing, abducted, or exploited children; and (4) any other related matters the Attorney General or the Secretary of Transportation determines appropriate. (b) Report required The Comptroller General shall submit a report on the findings of the study required under subsection (a) to— (1) the Committee on the Judiciary and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate; (2) the Committee on the Judiciary and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives; and (3) each of the delegates or resident commissioner to the House of Representatives from American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands of the United States. (c) Public availability The Comptroller General shall make the report required under subsection (b) available on a public Government website. (d) Obtaining official data (1) In general The Comptroller General may secure information necessary to conduct the study under subsection (a) directly from any Federal agency and from any territorial government receiving grant funding under the PROTECT Act. Upon request of the Comptroller General, the head of a Federal agency or territorial government shall furnish the requested information to the Comptroller General. (2) Agency records Notwithstanding paragraph (1), nothing in this subsection shall require a Federal agency or any territorial government to produce records subject to a common law evidentiary privilege. Records and information shared with the Comptroller General shall continue to be subject to withholding under sections 552 and 552a of title 5, United States Code. The Comptroller General is obligated to give the information the same level of confidentiality and protection required of the Federal agency or territorial government. The Comptroller General may be requested to sign a nondisclosure or other agreement as a condition of gaining access to sensitive or proprietary data to which the Comptroller General is entitled. (3) Privacy of personal information The Comptroller General, and any Federal agency and any territorial government that provides information to the Comptroller General, shall take such actions as are necessary to ensure the protection of the personal information of a minor. E Other Matters 1741. Technical, conforming, and clerical amendments (a) Title 10, United States Code Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows: (1) Section 127e(g) is amended by striking Low-Intensity Low Intensity (2) Section 142 is amended— (A) by striking subsection (d); and (B) by redesignating the second subsection (c) as subsection (d). (3) Section 192(c) is amended by striking the first paragraph (1). (4) Section 231 is amended— (A) in subsection (a)(1), by striking and (B) by striking quadrennial defense review national defense strategy (C) in subsection (f)(3), by striking section 118 section 113(g) (5) Section 1073c(a) is amended by redesignating the second paragraph (6) as paragraph (7). (6) Section 1044e is amended by striking subsection (h) subsection (i) (7) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 58 is amended by striking the item relating to section 1142 and inserting the following: 1142. Preseparation counseling; transmittal of certain records to Department of Veterans Affairs. . (8) Section 1564(c)(2) is amended in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by striking in is (9) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 113 is amended by striking Sec. Sec. (10) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 135 is amended by striking the item relating to section 2279c. (11) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 142 is amended by striking the item relating to section 2417 and inserting the following: 2417. Administrative and other costs. . (12) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 152 is amended by striking the item relating to section 2568a and inserting the following: 2568a. Damaged personal protective equipment: award to members separating from the Armed Forces and veterans. . (13) Section 2417(2) is amended by striking entities - entities— (14) Section 2641b(a)(3)(B) is amended by striking subsection (c)(5) subsection (c)(6) (15) Section 2804(b) is amended in the third sentence by striking ; and (16) Section 2890(e)(2) is amended by inserting a landlord (17) Section 2891(e)(1) is amended— (A) by inserting unit housing (B) in subparagraph (B), by inserting the tenant (18) Section 2891a is amended— (A) in subsection (b), by adding a period at the end of paragraph (2); and (B) in subsection (e)(2)(B), by striking the any basic (19) Section 2894(c)(3) is amended by inserting , the office installation housing management office (b) Title 38, United States Code Section 1967(a)(3)(D) of title 38, United States Code, is amended in the matter preceding clause (i) by inserting a comma after theater of operations (c) NDAA for fiscal year 2019 Effective as of August 13, 2018, and as if included therein as enacted, the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (1) Section 226(b)(3)(C) (132 Stat. 1686) is amended by striking commercial-off the-shelf commercially available off-the-shelf items (as defined in section 104 of title 41, United States Code) that may serve as (2) Section 809(b)(3) (132 Stat. 1840) is amended by striking Section 598(d)(4) of the National Defense Authorization Act of for Fiscal Year 2010 ( Public Law 111–84 10 U.S.C. 1561 Section 563(d)(4) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( Public Law 110–417 10 U.S.C. 1561 (3) Section 836(a)(2)(B) (132 Stat. 1860) is amended by inserting of such title Section 104(1)(A) (4) Section 836(c)(8) is amended by striking subparagraphs (A) and (B) and inserting the following new subparagraphs: (A) by striking commercial items commercial products (B) by striking the item commercial product . (5) Section 889(f) (132 Stat. 1918) is amended by striking appropriate congressional committees’ appropriate congressional committees (6) Section 1286(e)(2)(D) ( 10 U.S.C. 2358 improve improved (7) Section 1757(a) ( 50 U.S.C. 4816 to persons who are potential (8) Section 1759(a)(2) ( 50 U.S.C. 4818 (9) Section 1763(c) ( 50 U.S.C. 4822 December 5, 1991 December 5, 1995 (10) Section 1773(b)(1) ( 50 U.S.C. 4842 section 1752(1)(D) section 1752(2)(D) (11) Section 1774(a) ( 50 U.S.C. 4843 under section 1773 (12) Section 2827(b)(1) (132 Stat. 2270) is amended by inserting in the matter preceding the paragraphs amended (d) NDAA for fiscal year 2016 Effective as of December 23, 2016, and as if included therein as enacted, section 856(a)(1) the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( Public Law 114–92 10 U.S.C. 2377 United States Code, title 41, (e) Coordination with other amendments made by this Act For purposes of applying amendments made by provisions of this Act other than this section, the amendments made by this section shall be treated as having been enacted immediately before any such amendments by other provisions of this Act. 1742. Addition of Chief of the National Guard Bureau to the list of officers providing reports of unfunded priorities Section 222a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (6); and (2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph: (5) The Chief of the National Guard Bureau. . 1743. Acceptance of property by military academies and museums (a) Acceptance of property Section 2601 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(2), by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new subparagraph: (C) The Secretary concerned may display, at a military museum, recognition for an individual or organization that contributes money to a nonprofit entity described in subparagraph (A), or an individual or organization that contributes a gift directly to the armed force concerned for the benefit of a military museum, whether or not the contribution is subject to the condition that recognition be provided. The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe uniform regulations governing the circumstances under which contributor recognition may be provided, appropriate forms of recognition, and suitable display standards. ; and (2) in subsection (e)(1)— (A) by inserting or personal real (B) by striking or the Coast Guard Academy the Coast Guard Academy, the National Defense University, the Defense Acquisition University, the Air University, the Army War College, the Army Command and General Staff College, the Naval War College, the Naval Postgraduate School, or the Marine Corps University (b) Lease of non-excess property to military museums (1) In general Section 2667 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) in subsection (b)— (i) in paragraph (7), by striking and (ii) in paragraph (8), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and (iii) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (9) in the case of a lease of a museum facility to a museum foundation, may provide for use in generating revenue for activities of the museum facility and for such administrative purposes as may be necessary to support the facility. ; (B) in subsection (i), by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (6) The term museum foundation (A) qualifying as an exempt organization under section 501(c)(3) (B) incorporated for the primary purpose of supporting a Department of Defense museum. ; and (C) in subsection (k)— (i) in the subsection heading, by inserting and museums leases for education (ii) by inserting or to a museum foundation (2) Repeals (A) Lease or license of United States Navy Museum facilities at Washington Navy Yard, District of Columbia The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 ( Public Law 109–163 (B) Lease of facility to Marine Corps Heritage Foundation Section 2884 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 ( Public Law 106–398 1744. Reauthorization of National Oceanographic Partnership Program (a) National Oceanographic Partnership Program Section 8931 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 8931. National Oceanographic Partnership Program (a) Establishment The Secretary of the Navy shall establish a program to be known as the National Oceanographic Partnership Program (b) Purposes The purposes of the program are as follows: (1) To promote the national goals of assuring national security, advancing economic development, protecting quality of life, ensuring environmental stewardship, and strengthening science education and communication through improved knowledge of the ocean. (2) To coordinate and strengthen oceanographic efforts in support of those goals by— (A) creating and carrying out partnerships among Federal agencies, academia, industry, and other members of the oceanographic community in the areas of science, data, resources, education, and communication; and (B) accepting, planning, and executing oceanographic research projects funded by grants, contracts, cooperative agreements, or other vehicles as appropriate, that contribute to assuring national security, advancing economic development, protecting quality of life, ensuring environmental stewardship, and strengthening science education and communication through improved knowledge of the ocean. . (b) Ocean Policy Committee (1) In general Section 8932 of such title is amended to read as follows: 8932. Ocean Policy Committee (a) Committee There is established an Ocean Policy Committee (hereinafter referred to as the Committee (b) Responsibilities The Committee shall continue the activities of that Committee as it was in existence on the day before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021. In discharging its responsibilities and to assist in the execution of the activities delineated in this subsection, the Committee may delegate to a subcommittee, as appropriate. The Committee shall— (1) prescribe policies and procedures to implement the National Oceanographic Partnership Program; (2) engage and collaborate, pursuant to existing laws and regulations, with stakeholders, including regional ocean partnerships, to address ocean-related matters that may require interagency or intergovernmental solutions; (3) facilitate coordination and integration of Federal activities in ocean and coastal waters to inform ocean policy and identify priority ocean research, technology, and data needs; and (4) review, select, and identify partnership projects for implementation under the program, based on— (A) whether the project addresses important research objectives or operational goals; (B) whether the project has, or is designed to have, appropriate participation within the oceanographic community of public, academic, commercial, private participation or support; (C) whether the partners have a long-term commitment to the objectives of the project; (D) whether the resources supporting the project are shared among the partners; and (E) whether the project has been subjected to adequate review according to each of the supporting agencies. (c) Annual report and briefing (1) Not later than March 1 of each year, the Committee shall post a report on the National Oceanographic Partnership Program on a publicly available website and brief— (A) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate; (B) the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; (C) the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives; (D) the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives; and (E) the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. (2) The report and all briefing materials shall be posted to a publicly available website not later than 30 days after the briefing. (3) The report and briefing shall include the following: (A) A description of activities of the program carried out during the prior fiscal year. (B) A general outline of the activities planned for the program during the current fiscal year. (C) A summary of projects, partnerships, and collaborations, including the Federal and non-Federal sources of funding, continued from the prior fiscal year and projects expected to begin during the current and subsequent fiscal years, as required in the program office report outlined in section 8932(f)(2)(C) of this title. (D) The amounts requested in the budget submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31 for the subsequent fiscal year, for the programs, projects, activities and the estimated expenditures under such programs, projects, and activities, to execute the National Oceanographic Partnership Program. (E) A summary of national ocean research priorities informed by the Ocean Research Advisory Panel required in section 8933(b)(4) of this title. (F) A list of the members of the Ocean Research Advisory Panel described in section 8933(a) of this title and any working groups described in section 8932(f)(2)(A) of this title in existence during the fiscal years covered. (d) National oceanographic partnership fund (1) There is established in the Treasury a separate account to be known as the National Oceanographic Partnership Program Fund to be jointly managed by the Secretary of the Navy, the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and any other Federal agency that contributes amounts to the Fund. (2) Amounts in the Fund shall be available to the National Oceanic Partnership Program without further appropriation to remain available for up to 5 years from the date contributed or until expended for the purpose of carrying out this section. (3) There is authorized to be credited to the Fund the following: (A) Such amounts as determined appropriate to be transferred to the Fund by the head of a Federal agency or entity participating in the National Oceanographic Partnership Program. (B) Funds provided by a State, local government, tribal government, territory, or possession, or any subdivisions thereof. (C) Funds contributed by— (i) a non-profit organization, individual, or Congressionally-established foundation; and (ii) by private grants, contracts, and donations. (4) For the purpose of carrying out this section, as directed by the Committee, departments or agencies represented on the Committee may enter into contracts, make grants, including transactions authorized by paragraph (5), and may transfer funds available to the National Oceanographic Partnership Program under paragraph (3) to participating departments and agencies for such purposes. (5) The Committee or any participating Federal agency or entity may enter into an agreement to use, with or without reimbursement, the land, services, equipment, personnel, and facilities of any department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States, or of any State, local government, Indian tribal government, Territory, District of Columbia, or possession, or of any political subdivision thereof, or of any foreign government or international organization or individual, for the purpose of carrying out this section. (e) Establishment and forms of partnership projects A partnership project under the National Oceanographic Partnership Program— (1) may be established by any instrument that the Committee considers appropriate; and (2) may include demonstration projects. (f) Partnership program office (1) The Secretary of the Navy and Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration shall jointly establish a partnership program office for the National Oceanographic Partnership Program. Competitive procedures will be used to select an external operator for the partnership program office. (2) The Committee will monitor the performance of the duties of the partnership program office, which shall consist of the following: (A) To support working groups established by the Committee or subcommittee and report working group activities to the Committee, including working group proposals for partnership projects. (B) To support the process for proposing partnership projects to the Committee, including, where appropriate, managing review of such projects. (C) To submit to the Committee and make publicly available an annual report on the status of all partnership projects, including the Federal and non-Federal sources of funding for each project, and activities of the office. (D) To perform any additional duties for the administration of the National Oceanographic Partnership Program that the Committee considers appropriate. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 893 8932. Ocean Policy Committee. . (c) Ocean Research Advisory Panel Section 8933 of such title is amended to read as follows: 8933. Ocean Research Advisory Panel (a) Establishment (1) The Committee shall establish an Ocean Research Advisory Panel consisting of not less than 10 and not more than 18 members appointed by the Co-chairs, including the following: (A) Three members who will represent the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (B) Members selected from among individuals who will represent the views of ocean industries, State, tribal, territorial or local governments, academia, and such other views as the Co-chairs consider appropriate. (C) Members selected from among individuals eminent in the fields of marine science, marine technology, and marine policy, or related fields. (2) The Committee shall ensure that an appropriate balance of academic, scientific, industry, and geographical interests and gender and racial diversity are represented by the members of the Advisory Panel. (b) Responsibilities The Committee shall assign the following responsibilities to the Advisory Panel: (1) To advise the Committee on policies and procedures to implement the National Oceanographic Partnership Program. (2) To advise the Committee on matters relating to national oceanographic science, engineering, facilities, or resource requirements. (3) To advise the Committee on improving diversity, equity, and inclusion in the ocean sciences and related fields. (4) To advise the Committee on national ocean research priorities. (5) Any additional responsibilities that the Committee considers appropriate. (6) To meet no fewer than two times a year. (c) Administrative and technical support The Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration shall provide such administrative and technical support as the Ocean Research Advisory Panel may require. (d) Federal advisory committee act Section 14 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the Ocean Research Advisory Panel appointed under section 8933. . 1745. Requirements relating to program and project management (a) Standards for Program and Project Management Section 503(c)(1)(D) of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking consistent with widely accepted standards in accordance with standards accredited by the American National Standards Institute (b) Program Management Improvement Officers and Program Management Policy Council Section 1126 of title 31, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(1), by inserting after senior executive of the agency , who has significant program and project management oversight responsibilities, (2) in subsection (b)(4) by striking twice four times 1746. Quarterly briefings on Joint All Domain Command and Control concept (a) In general During the period beginning on October 1, 2020, and ending on October 1, 2022, the Director of the Joint All Domain Command and Control (in this section referred to as JADC2 CFT (b) Elements Each briefing under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to the JADC2 concept, the following elements: (1) The status of the joint concept of command and control. (2) How the JADC2 CFT is identifying gaps and addressing validated requirements based on the joint concept of command and control. (3) Progress in developing specific plans to evaluate and implement materiel and non-materiel improvements to command and control capabilities. (4) Clarification on distribution of responsibilities and authorities within the CFT and the Office of the Secretary of Defense with respect to JADC2, and how the CFT and the Office of the Secretary of Defense are synchronizing and aligning with joint and military concepts, solutions, experimentation, and exercises. (5) The status of and review of any recommendations for resource allocation necessary to achieve operational JADC2. (6) A sufficiency assessment of planned funding across the future years defense program for the development of JADC2 capabilities. 1747. Resources to implement a Department of Defense policy on civilian casualties in connection with United States military operations (a) Resources to implement Department of Defense policy on civilian casualties in connection with United States military operations (1) Purpose The purpose of this section is to facilitate fulfillment of the requirements in section 936 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( 10 U.S.C. 134 (2) Personnel Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall do the following: (A) Add to, and assign within, each of the United States Central Command, the United States Africa Command, the United States Special Operations Command, the United States European Command, the United States Southern Command, the United States Indo-Pacific Command, and the United States Northern Command not fewer than two personnel who shall have primary responsibility for the following in connection with military operations undertaken by such command: (i) Providing guidance and oversight relating to prevention of and response to civilian casualties, promotion of observance of human rights, and the protection of civilians and civilian infrastructure. (ii) Overseeing civilian casualty response functions on behalf of the commander of such command. (iii) Receiving reports of civilian casualties and conduct of civilian casualty assessments. (iv) Analyzing civilian casualty incidents and trends. (v) Offering condolences for casualties, including ex gratia payments. (vi) Ensuring the integration of activities relating to civilian casualty mitigation, protection of civilians, and promotion of observance of human rights in security cooperation activities. (vii) Consulting with non-governmental organizations on civilian casualty and human rights matters. (B) Add to, and assign within, the Office of the Under Secretary for Policy not fewer than two personnel who shall have primary responsibility for implementing and overseeing implementation by the components of the Department of Defense of Department policy on civilian casualties resulting from United States military operations. (C) Add to, and assign within, the Joint Staff not fewer than two personnel who shall have primary responsibility for the following: (i) Overseeing implementation by the components of the Department of Defense of Department policy on civilian casualties resulting from United States military operations. (ii) Developing and sharing in the implementation of such policy. (iii) Communicating operational guidance on such policy. (3) Training, software, and other requirements (A) In general In each of fiscal years 2021 through 2023, the Secretary of Defense and each Secretary of a military department may obligate and expend, from amounts specified in subparagraph (B), not more than $5,000,000 for the following: (i) Training related to civilian casualty mitigation and response. (ii) Information technology equipment, support and maintenance, and data storage, in order to implement the policy of the Department related relating to civilian casualties resulting from United States military operations as required by section 936 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019. (B) Funds The funds for a fiscal year specified in this subparagraph are funds as follows: (i) In the case of the Secretary of Defense, amounts authorized to be appropriated for such fiscal year for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide. (ii) In the case of a Secretary of a military department, amounts authorized to be appropriated for such fiscal year for operation and maintenance for the components of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of such Secretary. (b) United States military operations defined In this section, the term United States military operations 1748. Sense of Congress regarding reporting of civilian casualties resulting from United States military operations It is the sense of Congress— (1) to commend the Department of Defense for the measures it has implemented and is currently implementing to prevent, mitigate, track, investigate, learn from, respond to, and report civilian casualties resulting from United States military operations; and (2) to agree with the Department that civilian casualties are a tragic and unavoidable part of war, and to recognize that the Department endeavors to conduct all military operations in compliance with the international law of armed conflict and the laws of the United States, including distinction, proportionality, and the requirement to take feasible precautions in planning and conducting operations to reduce the risk of harm to civilians and other protected persons and objects; and the protection of civilians and other protected persons and objects, in addition to a legal obligation and a strategic interest, is a moral and ethical imperative; that the Department has submitted to Congress three successive annual reports on civilian casualties resulting from United States military operations for calendar years 2017, 2018, and 2019, and has updated reports as appropriate; and to recognize the efforts of the Department, both in policy and in practice, to reduce the harm to civilians and other protected persons and objects resulting from United States military operations, and to encourage the Department to make additional progress in— (A) developing at all combatant commands personnel and offices responsible for advising the commanders of such commands, and integrating into command strategy, the promotion of observance of human rights and the protection of civilians and other protected persons and objects; (B) finalizing and implementing the policy of the Department relating to civilian casualties resulting from United States military operations, as required by section 936 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( 10 U.S.C. 134 (C) finalizing Department-wide regulations to implement section 1213 of the National Defense Authorization for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (D) professionalizing foreign partner forces to reduce civilian casualties, including in connection with train and equip programs, advise, assist, accompany, and enable missions, and fully combined and coalition operations. 1749. Prohibition of public display of Confederate battle flag on Department of Defense property (a) Prohibition Except as provided in subsection (b) the Secretary of Defense shall prohibit the public display of the Confederate battle flag at all Department of Defense property. (b) Exceptions The prohibition under subsection (a) shall not apply to— (1) a museum located on a Department of Defense installation that addresses the Civil War from a historical or educational perspective; (2) an educational or historical display depicting a Civil War battle in which the Confederate battle flag is present, but not the main focus of the display; (3) a State flag that incorporates the Confederate battle flag; (4) a State-issued license plate with a depiction of the Confederate battle flag; or (5) a grave site of a Confederate soldier. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) The term Confederate battle flag (2) The term Department of Defense property (A) office buildings, facilities, naval vessels, aircraft, Government vehicles, hangars, ready rooms, conference rooms, individual offices, cubicles, storage rooms, tool and equipment rooms, workshops, break rooms, galleys, recreational areas, commissaries, Navy and Marine Corps exchanges, and heads; (B) sensitive compartmented information facilities and other secure facilities; (C) open-bay barracks and common areas of barracks and living quarters; (D) all Department of Defense school houses and training facilities including, officer candidate school, the basic school, recruit training command, and recruiting offices; (E) all areas of the Department of Defense in public or plain view, including outside areas, work office buildings, stores, or barracks, including parking lots; (F) the front yard or external porch of Government-owned and Government-operated housing and public-private venture housing; and (G) automobile bumper stickers, clothing, and other apparel that is located on or in any installation, workplace, common-access area, or public area of the Department of Defense. 1750. Deployment of real-time status of special use airspace (a) In general The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, in consultation, as appropriate, with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of the military services, including the National Guard and Air National Guard, and other appropriate Federal agencies, shall initiate, not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, a program to enable public dissemination of information on— (1) the real-time status of the activation or deactivation of military operations areas and restricted areas; and (2) the reports submitted to the Administrator pursuant to section 73.19 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations. (b) Status report (1) In general Not later than one year after the Administrator initiates the program required under subsection (a), and every year thereafter until such program is complete, the Administrator shall submit a status report to the appropriate committees of Congress on the implementation of such program. (2) Contents The report required under paragraph (1) shall contain, at a minimum— (A) an update on the progress of the Administrator in modifying policies, systems, or equipment that may be necessary to enable the public dissemination of information on the real-time status of the activation or deactivation of military operations areas and restricted areas; (B) a description of any challenges to completing the program initiated pursuant to subsection (a), including challenges in— (i) receiving the timely and complete submissions of data concerning airspace usage; (ii) modifying policies; and (iii) acquiring necessary systems or equipment; and (C) a timeline of the anticipated completion of the program and the modifications described in subparagraph (A). (c) Utilization reports Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report to the appropriate committees of Congress— (1) describing whether the Department of Defense has submitted the utilization reports required under section 73.19 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations for the prior fiscal year, and, if so, to what extent such reports have been submitted; and (2) providing, if the Secretary discovers that all such reports have not been submitted in a timely and complete manner— (A) an explanation for the failure to submit any such reports in the manner prescribed by regulation; and (B) a plan to ensure the timely and complete submission of all such reports. (d) Policies Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit a report to the appropriate committees of Congress on special use airspace, including a review of the Federal Aviation Administration’s— (1) policies and processes for establishing, reviewing, and revoking military operations areas and restricted areas; and (2) administration, including release of, underutilized special use airspace. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term appropriate committees of Congress (A) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. (2) The term underutilized 1751. Duties of Secretary under Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (a) Ensuring ability of absent uniformed services voters serving at diplomatic and consular posts to receive and transmit balloting materials In carrying out the Secretary’s duties as the Presidential designee under the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act ( 52 U.S.C. 20301 (b) Effective date This section shall apply with respect to elections held on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 1752. Publicly available database of casualties of members of the Armed Forces (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall publish on an appropriate publicly available website of the Department of Defense a database of all casualties of members of the Armed Forces of the United States that occur during military operations that take place during 1990 or any subsequent year. (b) Requirements The Secretary shall ensure that the database published under subsection (a) has the following capabilities: (1) The capability of generating a machine readable report, to the extent practicable, through searches based on each, and any combination, of the casualty attributes. (2) The capability of downloading individual records as the result of a search based on each, and any combination, of the casualty attributes. (c) Next-of-kin opt out The Secretary shall develop a mechanism under which the next-of-kin (as determined by the Secretary) of any individual whose information would be included in the database required under subsection (a) may elect to have such information excluded from the database. (d) Casualty attributes In this section, the term casualty attributes (1) The conflict in which the casualty occurred. (2) The country where the casualty occurred. (3) The attributes of the member of the Armed Forces, including— (A) service; (B) component; (C) name; (D) rank; (E) date of death; and (F) any other information as determined by the Secretary. 1753. Notice and comment for proposed actions of the Secretary of Defense relating to food and beverage ingredients (a) Notice and comment Before promulgating any service-wide or Department-wide final rule, statement, or determination relating to the limitation or prohibition of an ingredient in a food or beverage item provided to members of the Armed Forces by the Department of Defense (including an item provided through a commissary store, a dining facility on a military installation, or a military medical treatment facility), the Secretary of Defense shall— (1) publish in the Federal Register a notice of the proposed rule, statement, or determination (in this section referred to as a proposed action (2) provide interested persons an opportunity to submit public comments with respect to the proposed action. (b) Matters to be included in notice The Secretary shall include in any notice published under subsection (a)(2) the following: (1) A summary of the notice. (2) The date of publication of the notice. (3) The contact information for the office of the Department of Defense responsible for the proposed action. (4) The deadline for comments to be submitted with respect to the proposed action and a description of the method to submit such comments. (5) A description of the proposed action. (6) Findings and a statement of reason supporting the proposed action. (c) Waiver authority The Director of the Defense Logistics Agency may waive subsections (a) and (b) if the Director determines such waiver is necessary for military operations or for the response to a national emergency declared by the President under the National Emergencies Act ( 50 U.S.C. 1601 (d) Reports (1) Reports On a quarterly basis, the Director of the Defense Logistics Agency shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing an identification of any waiver under subsection (c) issued or in effect during the quarter preceding submission of the report. (2) Matters A report under paragraph (1) shall include, with respect to each waiver identified, the following: (A) The date, time, and location of the issuance of such waiver. (B) A detailed justification for the issuance of such waiver. (C) An identification of the rule, statement, or determination for which the Director issued such waiver, including the proposed duration of such rule, statement, or determination. 1754. Space strategies and assessment (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that the United States Government should support activities in space by— (1) ensuring robust, innovative, and increasingly capable civil and national security space programs; (2) supporting effective and stable space partnerships with allies of the United States; (3) leveraging, to the greatest extent practicable and appropriate, commercial space capabilities; and (4) ensuring freedom of navigation and providing measures to assure the supply chain related to such space assets and manufacturing processes of such assets. (b) Strategy required Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President, in consultation with the National Space Council, shall develop and maintain a strategy to ensure that the United States, as appropriate, strengthens civil and national security capabilities and operations in space through— (1) challenging and inspiring civil space goals and programs; (2) partnerships with allies of the United States; (3) leveraging of commercial space capabilities; (4) ensuring supply chain and manufacturing processes for space assets; (5) sustaining a highly skilled, world-class workforce; and (6) considering the financial security and cybersecurity concerns threatening commercial and Federal Government launch sites of the United States. (c) Submission of strategy and plan Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chair of the National Space Council, in consultation with relevant departments and agencies of the Federal Government, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report setting forth— (1) the strategy under subsection (b); and (2) a plan to implement the strategy, including to— (A) ensure the freedom of navigation of space assets and protect the supply chain relating to such assets and manufacturing process of such assets from threats from the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation, which may include protection from intellectual property theft and threats with respect to electronic warfare capabilities; (B) identify capabilities required to ensure civil and national security space leadership; (C) provide contingency and resiliency for civil and national security space operations; and (D) strengthen relations with the allies of the United States with respect to space. (d) Assessment and report (1) Assessment and report requirement Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes— (A) an assessment of the capabilities and role of relevant departments and agencies of the Federal Government to— (i) ensure access to launch, communications, and freedom of navigation and other relevant infrastructure and services for civil and national security space programs and activities; and (ii) identify vulnerabilities that could affect access to space infrastructure; and (iii) address financial security and cybersecurity concerns threatening commercial and Federal Government launch sites of the United States; and (B) recommendations and costs to improve the capabilities assessed pursuant to subparagraph (A), including recommendations with respect to— (i) the electronic warfare capabilities of China and Russia; and (ii) the use of counterspace weapons and cyber attacks by China and Russia. (2) Form The report under paragraph (1) may include a classified annex. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term appropriate congressional committees (A) the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; (B) the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives; (C) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; (D) the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives; (E) the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; (F) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (G) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. (2) The term launch site 1755. Nonimmigrant status for certain nationals of Portugal For purposes of clauses (i) and (ii) of section 101(a)(15)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E) 1756. Sense of Congress on extension of limitations on importation of uranium from Russian Federation It is the sense of Congress that— (1) a secure nuclear fuel supply chain is essential to the economic and national security of the United States; (2) the Government of the Russian Federation uses its control over energy resources, including in the civil nuclear sector, to exert political influence and create economic dependency in other countries; (3) the Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Investigation on Uranium from the Russian Federation (commonly referred to as the “Russian Suspension Agreement”), which limits imports of Russian uranium to 20 percent of the market share, is vital to averting American dependence on Russian energy; (4) the United States should— (A) expeditiously complete negotiation of an extension of the Russian Suspension Agreement to cap the market share for Russian uranium at 20 percent or lower; or (B) if an agreement to extend the Russian Suspension Agreement cannot be reached, complete the antidumping investigation under title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1671 (i) to avoid unfair trade in uranium and maintain a nuclear fuel supply chain in the United States, consistent with the national security and nonproliferation goals of the United States; and (ii) to protect the United States nuclear fuel supply chain from the continued manipulation of the global and United States uranium markets by the Russian Federation and Russian-influenced competitors; (5) a renegotiated, long-term extension of the Russian Suspension Agreement can prevent adversaries of the United States from monopolizing the nuclear fuel supply chain; (6) as was done in 2008, upon completion of a new negotiated long-term extension of the Russian Suspension Agreement, Congress should enact legislation to codify the terms of extension into law to ensure long-term stability for the domestic nuclear fuel supply chain; and (7) if the negotiations to extend the Russian Suspension Agreement prove unsuccessful, Congress should be prepared to enact legislation to prevent the manipulation by the Russian Federation of global uranium markets and potential domination by the Russian Federation of the United States uranium market. 1757. Authority to establish a movement coordination center pacific in the Indopacific region (a) Authority to establish (1) In general The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may authorize— (A) the establishment of a Movement Coordination Center Pacific (in this section referred to as the Center (B) participation of the Department of Defense in an Air Transport and Air-to-Air refueling and other Exchanges of Services program (in this section referred to as the ATARES program (2) Scope of participation Participation in the ATARES program under paragraph (1)(B) shall be limited to the reciprocal exchange or transfer of air transportation and air refueling services on a reimbursable basis or by replacement-in-kind or the exchange of air transportation or air refueling services of an equal value with foreign militaries. (3) Limitations The Department of Defense’s balance of executed transportation hours, whether as credits or debits, in participation in the ATARES program under paragraph (1)(B) may not exceed 500 hours. The Department of Defense’s balance of executed flight hours for air refueling in the ATARES program under paragraph (1)(B) may not exceed 200 hours. (b) Written arrangement or agreement (1) Arrangement or agreement required The participation of the Department of Defense in the ATARES or exchange like program under subsection (a) shall be in accordance with a written arrangement or agreement entered into by the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State. (2) Funding arrangements If Department of Defense facilities, equipment, or funds are used to support the ATARES program, the written arrangement or agreement under paragraph (1) shall specify the details of any equitable cost-sharing or other funding arrangement. (3) Other elements Any written arrangement or agreement entered into under paragraph (1) shall require that any accrued credits and liabilities resulting from an unequal exchange or transfer of air transportation or air refueling services shall be liquidated, not less than once every five years, through the ATARES program. (c) Implementation In carrying out any written arrangement or agreement entered into under subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may— (1) pay the Department of Defense’s equitable share of the operating expenses of the Center and the ATARES program from funds available to the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance; and (2) assign members of the Armed Forces or Department of Defense civilian personnel, within billets authorized for the United States Indo-Pacific Command, to duty at the Center as necessary to fulfill the Department of Defense obligations under that arrangement or agreement. (d) Report Not later than March 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that contains— (1) a summary of the coordination structure of the center and program, and details related to its formation and implementation; (2) list of the military services, by country, participating or seeking to participate in the program; (3) for each country on the list under paragraph (2), a description of completed agreements and those still to be completed with host nations, as applicable; and (4) any other relevant matters that the Secretary determines should be included. 1758. Establishment of vetting procedures and monitoring requirements for certain military training (a) Establishment of vetting procedures (1) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish procedures to vet covered individuals for eligibility for physical access to Department of Defense installations and facilities within the United States. (2) Criteria for procedures The procedures established under paragraph (1) shall include biographic and biometric screening of covered individuals, continuous review of whether covered individuals should continue to be authorized for physical access, biographic checks of the immediate family members of covered individuals, and any other measures that the Secretary determines appropriate for vetting. (3) Collection of information The Secretary shall— (A) collect the information required to vet individuals under the procedures established under this subsection; (B) as required for the effective implementation of this section, seek to enter into agreements with the relevant departments and agencies of the United States to facilitate the sharing of information in the possession of such departments and agencies concerning covered individuals; and (C) ensure that the initial vetting of covered individuals is conducted as early and promptly as practicable, to minimize disruptions to United States programs to train foreign military students. (b) Determination authority (1) Review of vetting results The Secretary shall assign to an organization within the Department with responsibility for security and counterintelligence the responsibility of— (A) reviewing the results of the vetting of a covered individual conducted under subsection (a); and (B) making a recommendation regarding whether such individual should be given physical access to a Department of Defense installation or facility. (2) Negative recommendation If the recommendation with respect to a covered individual under paragraph (1)(B) is that the individual should not be given physical access to a Department of Defense installation or facility— (A) such individual may only be given such access if such access is authorized by the Secretary of Defense or the Deputy Secretary of Defense; and (B) the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Secretary of State is promptly provided with notification of such recommendation. (c) Additional security measures (1) Security measures required The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that— (A) all Department of Defense common access cards issued to foreign nationals in the United States comply with the credentialing standards issued by the Office of Personnel Management; (B) all such common access cards issued to foreign nationals in the United States include a visual indicator as required by the standard developed by the Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology; (C) physical access by covered individuals is limited, as appropriate, to those Department of Defense installations or facilities within the United States directly associated with the training or education or necessary for such individuals to access authorized benefits; (D) a policy is in place covering possession of firearms on Department of Defense property by covered individuals; (E) covered individuals who have been granted physical access to Department of Defense installations and facilities are incorporated into the Insider Threat Program of the Department of Defense; and (F) covered individuals are prohibited from transporting, possessing, storing, or using personally owned firearms on Department of Defense installations or property consistent with the Secretary of Defense policy memorandum dated January 16, 2020. (2) Effective date The security measures required under paragraph (1) shall take effect on the date that is 181 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (3) Notification required Upon the establishment of the security measures required under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives notice of the establishment of such security measures. (d) Reporting requirements (1) Briefing requirement Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committees on Armed Services and Foreign Affairs of the House of Representative a briefing on the establishment of any policy or guidance related to the implementation of this section. (2) Report Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to such committees a report on the implementation and effects of this section. Such report shall include a description of— (A) any positive or negative effects on the training of foreign military students as a result of this section; (B) the effectiveness of the vetting procedures implemented pursuant to this section in preventing harm to members of the Armed Forces and United States persons; (C) any mitigation strategies used to address any negative effects of the implementation of this section; and (D) a proposed plan to mitigate any ongoing negative effects to the vetting and training of foreign military students by the Department of Defense. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term covered individual (A) is seeking physical access to a Department of Defense installation or facility within the United States; and (B) is— (i) selected, nominated, or accepted for training or education for a period of more than 14 days occurring on a Department of Defense installation or facility within the United States; or (ii) an immediate family member accompanying any foreign national who has been selected, nominated, or accepted for such training or education. (2) The term United States (3) The term immediate family member 1759. Women, Peace, and Security Act implementation (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that $15,000,000 annually is an appropriate allocation of funding to be made available for activities consistent with the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017 ( Public Law 115–68 (b) In general During the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on September 30, 2025, the Secretary of Defense shall carry out activities consistent with the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017 and with the guidance specified in this section, including by carrying out— (1) any Defense-wide directives and programs that advance the implementation of the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017, including directives relating to military doctrine, programs that are applicable across the Department, and programs that are specific to a combatant command; (2) the hiring and training of full-time equivalent personnel as gender advisors of the Department; (3) the integration of gender analysis into training for military personnel across ranks, to include special emphasis on senior level training and support for women, peace, and security; and (4) security cooperation activities that further implement the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017. (c) Security cooperation activities Consistent with the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall incorporate gender analysis and participation by women into security cooperation activities conducted with the national security forces of foreign countries pursuant to subsection (b)(4), including by— (1) incorporating gender analysis (including data disaggregated by sex) and priorities for women, peace, and security into educational, training, and capacity-building materials and programs, including as authorized by section 333 of title 10, United States Code; (2) advancing and advising on the recruitment, employment, development, retention, and promotion of women in the national security forces of such foreign countries, including by— (A) identifying available military career opportunities for women; (B) promoting such career opportunities among women and girls; (C) promoting the skills necessary for such careers; (D) encouraging the interest of women and girls in such careers, including by highlighting as role models women in such careers in the United States or in applicable foreign countries; and (E) advising on best practices to prevent the harassment and abuse of women serving in the national security forces of such foreign countries; (3) incorporating training and advising to address sexual harassment and abuse against women within such national security forces; (4) integrating gender analysis into policy and planning; and (5) ensuring any infrastructure constructed pursuant to the security cooperation activity addresses the requirements of women serving in such national security forces, including by addressing appropriate equipment. (d) Partner country assessments The Secretary of Defense shall include in any partner country assessment conducted in the course of carrying out security cooperation activities specified in subsection (b)(4) consideration of any barriers or opportunities with respect to women in the national security forces of such partner countries, including any barriers or opportunities relating to— (1) protections against exploitation, abuse, and harassment; or (2) recruitment, employment, development, retention, or promotion of the women. (e) Standardization of policies (1) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall initiate a process to standardize policies relating to women, peace, and security across the Department of Defense. (2) Roles, responsibilities, and requirements In carrying out the process initiated under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall establish roles, responsibilities, and requirements for gender advisors, gender focal points, and women, peace, and security subject matter experts, including with respect to commander and senior official-level engagement and support for women, peace, and security commitments. (f) Department education, and training The Secretary of Defense shall— (1) integrate gender analysis into relevant training for all members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense; (2) develop standardized training, across the Department, for gender advisors, gender focal points, and women, peace, and security subject matter experts; and (3) ensure that gender analysis and the meaningful participation of women and their relationship to security outcomes is addressed in professional military education curriculum. (g) Briefing Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency shall provide a briefing to the appropriate committees of Congress on the efforts to build partner defense institution and security force capacity pursuant to this section. (h) Reports During the period beginning on the date of the enactment and ending on January 1, 2025, on a basis that is not less frequently than annually, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress reports on the steps the Department has taken to implement the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017, including with respect to activities carried out under this section. (i) Definitions In this section: (1) The term appropriate committees of Congress (A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate. (2) The term gender analysis Public Law 115–428 1760. Developing crisis capabilities to meet needs for homeland security-critical supplies (a) In general The Secretary of Homeland Security shall coordinate with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies— (1) to identify categories of homeland security-critical supplies that would be needed to address potential national emergencies or disasters, including any public health emergency, act of terrorism (as defined in section 3077 of title 18, United States Code), cyber attack, and other attack; (2) to develop plans, designs, and guidance relating to the production, in accordance with other applicable law, of the categories of homeland security-critical supplies identified pursuant to paragraph (1) to address the respective national emergencies and disasters, including such production by nontraditional manufacturers; and (3) based on such final plans, designs, and guidance, to enter into such contingent arrangements with governmental and private entities, in accordance with other applicable law, as may be necessary to expedite the production of homeland security-critical supplies in the event of a national emergency or disaster. (b) Process In coordinating the development or revision of a plan, design, or guidance with respect to any homeland security-critical supply under this section: (1) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall give each Federal department or agency with responsibility for regulating the supply an opportunity— (A) to contribute to the development or revision of the plan, design, or guidance; and (B) to approve or disapprove the plan, design, or guidance under regulations appropriate to approving the supply for emergency or disaster use. (2) If a Federal department or agency with responsibility for regulating the homeland security-critical supply disapproves of the plan, design, or guidance with respect to the supply, the head of the disapproving department or agency shall provide to the Secretary of Homeland Security the rationale for the disapproval. (3) The Secretary of Homeland Security may— (A) if no Federal department or agency disapproves a plan, design, or guidance as described in paragraphs (1)(B) and (2), finalize the plan, design, or guidance for purposes of subsections (a)(3) and (c); and (B) if a Federal department or agency does disapprove a plan, design, or guidance as described in paragraphs (1)(B) and (2), provide an updated plan, design, or guidance for review and approval or disapproval in accordance with paragraphs (1) and (2). (c) Public posting The Secretary of Homeland Security shall publish each final plan, design, or guidance that is developed under this section on a public Internet website, except that the Secretary may withhold publication of, or redact information from the publication of, a plan, design, or guidance if— (1) publicly posting the information would not be in the interest of homeland security; (2) the information is protected from public disclosure by other applicable law; or (3) the information is protected from public disclosure by contract. (d) Relation to other law Nothing in this section shall be construed to expand, repeal, limit, or otherwise affect the provisions of other applicable law pertaining to the regulation of a homeland security-critical supply. (e) Biennial review Not less than every two years, in accordance with subsections (a) through (e), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall coordinate the review and, as needed, revision of each plan, design, and guidance in effect under this section. (f) Definition In this section: (1) The term homeland security-critical supply (A) means any supply needed to ensure public safety and welfare during— (i) a national emergency or disaster, including any public health emergency, act of terrorism (as defined in section 3077 of title 18, United States Code), cyber attack, and other attack; or (ii) any other reasonably foreseeable contingency of grave consequence to the United States during which shortages are reasonably anticipated; and (B) includes a vaccine, a medication, medical equipment, and personal protective equipment. (2) The term nontraditional manufacturer (A) a home craftsperson; (B) a distiller; (C) a cosmetic manufacturer; (D) a manufacturing facility primarily designed for an industry other than manufacturing homeland security-critical supplies; (E) an institution of higher education; (F) an advanced manufacturing facility; (G) a machine shop; and (H) a research laboratory. 1761. Establishment of western emergency refined petroleum products reserve (a) Establishment The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of the Defense Logistics Agency, shall establish a reserve, to be known as the Western Emergency Refined Petroleum Products Reserve Reserve (b) Use of reserve In accordance with subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may make refined petroleum products stored in the Reserve available to other Federal agencies, State and local governments, and any other public entity determined appropriate by the Secretary of Defense. (c) Reimbursement The Secretary of Defense shall require reimbursement for associated costs for storage capacity or refined petroleum products made available to other Federal agencies, State or local governments, or any other public entity pursuant to this section. (d) Location The Reserve shall— (1) be located in the western region of the United States; (2) utilize salt cavern storage; and (3) be in immediate proximity to existing pipeline, rail, and highway infrastructure. (e) Condition on commencement Commencement of the program shall be subject to the availability of appropriations for the program. B Military Construction Authorizations 2001. Short title This division may be cited as the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law (a) Expiration of authorizations after three years Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained in titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire on the later of— (1) October 1, 2023; or (2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2024. (b) Exception Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have been obligated before the later of— (1) October 1, 2023; or (2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for fiscal year 2024 for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program. 2003. Effective date Titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX shall take effect on the later of— (1) October 1, 2020; or (2) the date of the enactment of this Act. XXI Army Military Construction 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Army: Inside the United States State Installation Amount Alaska Fort Wainwright $91,500,000 Arizona Yuma Proving Ground $14,000,000 Colorado Fort Carson $28,000,000 Georgia Fort Gillem $71,000,000 Fort Gordon $80,000,000 Hawaii Fort Shafter $26,000,000 Schofield Barracks $39,000,000 Wheeler Army Air Field $89,000,000 Louisiana Fort Polk $25,000,000 Oklahoma McAlester Army Ammunition Plant $35,000,000 Virginia Humphreys Engineer Center $51,000,000 2102. Family housing (a) Construction and acquisition Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installations, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Army: Family Housing State/Country Installation Units Amount Italy Vicenza Family Housing New Construction $84,100,000 Kwajalein Kwajalein Atoll Family Housing Replacement Construction $32,000,000 (b) Planning and design Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $3,300,000. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2020, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Army as specified in the funding table in section 4601. (b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 2104. Limitation on military construction project at Kwajalein Atoll The Secretary of the Army may not commence the military construction project authorized by section 2101(b) at Kwajalein Atoll, as specified in the funding table in section 4601, and none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for that military construction project may be obligated or expended, until the Secretary submits to Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a design plan for the project that ensures that, upon completion of the project, the project will be resilient to 15 inches of sea level rise and periods of complete inundation and wave-overwash predicted during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2017 project In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2102(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 XXII Navy Military Construction 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects (a) Inside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2203(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Navy: Inside the United States State Installation or Location Amount Arizona Marine Corps Air Station Yuma $99,600,000 California Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton $68,530,000 Naval Air Station Lemoore $187,220,000 Naval Base San Diego $128,500,000 Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms $76,500,000 Guam Andersen Air Force Base $21,280,000 Joint Region Marianas $546,550,000 Hawaii Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam $114,900,000 Maine Portsmouth Naval Shipyard $715,000,000 Nevada Fallon Range Training Complex $29,040,000 Virginia Naval Station Norfolk $30,400,000 (b) Outside the united states Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2203(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Navy: Outside the United States Country Installation or Location Amount Bahrain Island Naval Support Activity Bahrain $68,340,000 Greece Naval Support Activity Souda Bay $50,180,000 Spain Naval Station Rota $60,110,000 2202. Family housing and improvements to military family housing units (a) Family housing Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2203(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $5,854,000. (b) Improvements to military family housing units Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2203(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $37,043,000. 2203. Authorization of appropriations, Navy (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2020, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy, as specified in the funding table in section 4601. (b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. XXIII Air Force Military Construction 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects (a) Inside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2303(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Air Force: Inside the United States State Installation or Location Amount California Edwards Air Force Base $40,000,000 Guam Joint Region Marianas $56,000,000 New Jersey Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst $22,000,000 Texas Joint Base San Antonio $19,500,000 Virginia Joint Base Langley-Eustis $19,500,000 (b) Outside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2303(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installation or location outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table: Air Force: Outside the United States Country Installation or Location Amount Qatar Al Udeid $26,000,000 2302. Family housing and improvements to military family housing units (a) Family housing Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2303(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $2,969,000. (b) Improvements to military family housing units Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2303(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $94,245,000. 2303. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2020, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Air Force, as specified in the funding table in section 4601. (b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2301 may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 2304. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2018 project (a) Modification of project authority In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 (b) Modification of project amounts (1) Division B table The authorization table in section 2301(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 $136,992,000 $172,292,000 (2) Division D table The funding table in section 4601 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 $20,000 $55,300 2305. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2019 projects (a) Eielson air force base, alaska In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (b) Barksdale air force base, louisiana (1) Modification of project authority In the case of the authorization contained in table in section 2301(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (2) Project conditions The military construction project referred to in paragraph (1) shall be carried out consistent with the Unified Facilities Criteria relating to Entry Control Facilities and applicable construction guidelines of the Department of the Air Force. Construction in a flood plain is authorized, subject to the condition that the Secretary of the Air Force include appropriate mitigation measures. (3) Modification of project amounts (A) Division B table The authorization table in section 2301(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 $12,250,000 $48,000,000 (B) Division D table The funding table in section 4601 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 $12,250 $48,000 (c) Royal air force lakenheath, united kingdom In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (d) Force protection and safety The funding table in section 4601 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 $35,000 $50,000 2306. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2020 projects (a) Tyndall air force base, florida In the case of the authorizations contained in the table in section 2912(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (1) for construction of an Auxiliary Ground Equipment Facility, as specified in the funding table in section 4603 of such Act (133 Stat. 2103), the Secretary of the Air Force may construct up to 4,770 square meters of aircraft support equipment storage; (2) for construction of Dorm Complex Phase 1, as specified in such funding table, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct up to 18,770 square meters of visiting quarters; (3) for construction of Lodging Facilities Phase 1, as specified in such funding table, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct up to 12,471 meters of visiting quarters. (4) for construction of an Operations Group/Maintenance Group HQ at the installation, as specified in such funding table, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct up to 3,420 square meters of headquarters; (5) for construction of Ops/Aircraft Maintenance Unit/Hangar number 2 and Ops/Aircraft Maintenance Unit/Hangar number 3, as specified in such funding table, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct 2,127 square meters of squadron operations and 2,875 square meters of aircraft maintenance unit for each project; (6) for construction of a Security Forces Mobility Storage Facility, as specified in such funding table, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct up to 930 square meters of equipment storage; and (7) for construction of Site Development, Utilities, and Demolition Phase 2, as specified in such funding table, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct up to 7,000 meters of storm water piping, box culverts, underground detention, and grading for surface detention. (b) Offutt air force base, nebraska In the case of the authorizations contained in the table in section 2912(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (1) for construction of an Emergency Power Microgrid, as specified in the funding table in section 4603 of such Act (133 Stat. 2104), the Secretary of the Air Force may construct seven 2.5-megawatt diesel engine generators, seven diesel exhaust fluid systems, 15-kV switchgear, two import/export inter-ties, five import-only inter-ties, and 800 square meters of switchgear facility; (2) for construction of a Flightline Hangars Campus, as specified in such funding table, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct 445 square meter of petroleum operations center, 268 square meters of de-icing liquid storage, and 173 square meters of warehouse; and (3) for construction of a Lake Campus, as specified in such funding table, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct 240 square meters of recreation complex and 270 square meters of storage; (4) for construction of a Logistics Readiness Squadron Campus, as specified in such funding table, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct 2,536 square meters of warehouse; and (5) for construction of a Security Campus, as specified in such funding table, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct 4,218 square meters of operations center and 1,343 square meters of military working dog kennel. (c) Joint base langley-Eustis, virginia In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2912(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 2307. Technical corrections related to authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2020 family housing projects (a) Authorization of omitted Spangdahlem Air Base family housing project Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (b) Correction of amount authorized for family housing improvements Section 2303 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 $53,584,000 $46,638,000 XXIV Defense Agencies Military Construction 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects (a) Inside the united states Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Defense Agencies: Inside the United States State Installation or Location Amount Alabama Anniston Army Depot $18,000,000 Alaska Fort Greely $48,000,000 Arizona Fort Huachuca $33,728,000 Marine Corps Air Station Yuma $49,500,000 California Beale Air Force Base $22,800,000 Colorado Fort Carson $15,600,000 CONUS Unspecified CONUS Unspecified $14,400,000 Florida Hurlburt Field $83,120,000 Kentucky Fort Knox $69,310,000 New Mexico Kirtland Air Force Base $46,600,000 North Carolina Fort Bragg $113,800,000 Ohio Wright-Patterson Air Force Base $23,500,000 Texas Fort Hood $32,700,000 Virginia Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Story $112,500,000 Washington Joint Base Lewis-McChord $21,800,000 Navy Fuel Depot Manchester $82,000,000 (b) Outside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installation or location outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table: Defense Agencies: Outside the United States Country Installation or Location Amount Japan Defense Fuel Support Point Tsurumi $49,500,000 2402. Authorized Energy Resilience and Conservation Investment Program projects (a) Inside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation projects as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 ERCIP Projects: Inside the United States State Installation or Location Amount Alabama Fort Rucker $24,000,000 Arkansas Ebbing Air National Guard Base $2,600,000 California Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms $11,646,000 Military Ocean Terminal Concord $29,000,000 Naval Support Activity Monterey $10,540,000 Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake $8,950,000 District of Columbia Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling $44,313,000 Georgia Fort Benning $17,000,000 Maryland Naval Support Activity Bethesda $13,840,000 Naval Support Activity South Potomac $18,460,000 Missouri Whiteman Air Force Base $17,310,000 Nevada Creech Air Force Base $32,000,000 North Carolina Fort Bragg $6,100,000 Ohio Wright-Patterson Air Force Base $35,000,000 Tennessee Memphis Air National Guard Base $4,780,000 Virginia Naval Medical Center Portsmouth $611,000 Surface Combat Systems Center Wallops Island $9,100,000 (b) Outside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation projects as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 ERCIP Projects: Outside the United States Country Installation or Location Amount Italy Naval Support Activity Naples $3,490,000 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2020, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military departments), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. (b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2401 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 2404. Military construction infrastructure and weapon system synchronization for Ground Based Strategic Deterrent (a) Authorization for Planning and design Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for fiscal year 2021, for the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent, as specified in the funding table in section 4201, the Secretary of the Air Force may use not more than $15,000,000 for the purpose of obtaining or carrying out necessary planning and construction design in connection with military construction projects and other infrastructure projects necessary to support the development and fielding of the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent weapon system. (b) Air Force Project Management and Supervision Each contract entered into by the United States for a military construction project or other infrastructure project in connection with the development and fielding of the Ground Based Strategic Deterrence weapon system shall be carried out under the direction and supervision of the Secretary of the Air Force. The Secretary may utilize and consult with the Air Force Civil Engineer Center, the Army Corps of Engineers, and the Naval Facilities Engineering Command for subject matter expertise, contracting capacity, and other support as determined to be necessary by the Secretary to carry out this section. (c) Use of Single Prime Contractor The Secretary of the Air Force may award contracts for planning and construction design and for military construction projects and other infrastructure projects authorized by law in connection with the development and fielding of the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent weapon system to a single prime contractor if the Secretary determines that awarding the contracts to a single prime contractor— (1) is in the best interest of the Government; and (2) is necessary to ensure the proper synchronization and execution of work related to the development and fielding of the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent weapon system and its associated military construction projects and other infrastructure projects. (d) Exceptions to current law The Secretary of the Air Force may carry out this section without regard to the following provisions of law: (1) Section 2304 of title 10, United States Code. (2) Section 2807(a) of such title. (3) Section 2851(a) of such title. (e) Expiration of Authority The authorities provided by this section shall expire upon the earlier of the following: (1) The date that is 15 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. (2) The date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees a certification that the fielding of the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent weapon system is complete. (f) Report Required Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the plans to synchronize the development and fielding of the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent weapon system and its associated military construction projects and other infrastructure projects. The report shall contain, at minimum, the following elements: (1) A description of the estimated total cost, scope of work, location, and schedule for the planning and design, military construction, and other infrastructure investments necessary to support the development and fielding of the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent weapon system. (2) A recommendation regarding the methods by which a programmatic military construction authorization, authorization of appropriations, and appropriation, on an installation-by-installation basis, could be used to support the synchronized development and fielding of the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent and its associated military construction projects and other infrastructure projects. (3) Identification of the specific provisions of law, if any, that the Secretary determines may adversely impact or delay the development and fielding of the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent weapon system and its associated construction projects, assuming, as described in paragraph (2), the use of a programmatic military construction authorization on an installation-by-installation basis. (4) A plan to ensure sufficient capability and capacity to cover civilian and military manning for oversight and contract management related to the development and fielding of the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent weapon system and its associated construction projects. XXV International Programs A North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be appropriated for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction previously financed by the United States. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO (a) Authorization Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2020, for contributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program authorized by section 2501 as specified in the funding table in section 4601. (b) Authority to carry out project and recognize NATO authorization amounts as budgetary resources for project execution When the United States is designated as the Host Nation for the purposes of executing a project under the NATO Security Investment Program (NSIP), the Department of Defense construction agent may carry out the project and recognize the NATO project authorization amounts as budgetary resources to incur obligations for the purposes of executing the NSIP project. B Host Country In-Kind Contributions 2511. Republic of Korea funded construction projects Pursuant to agreement with the Republic of Korea for required in-kind contributions, the Secretary of Defense may accept military construction projects for the installations or locations in the Republic of Korea, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Republic of Korea Funded Construction Projects Component Installation or Location Project Amount Army Camp Carroll Site Development $49,000,000 Army Camp Humphreys Attack Reconnaissance Battalion Hangar $99,000,000 Army Camp Humphreys Hot Refuel Point $35,000,000 Navy COMROKFLT Naval Base, Busan Maritime Operations Center $26,000,000 Air Force Daegu Air Base AGE Facility and Parking Apron $14,000,000 Air Force Kunsan Air Base Backup Generator Plant $19,000,000 Air Force Osan Air Base Aircraft Corrosion Control Facility (Phase 3) $12,000,000 Air Force Osan Air Base Child Development Center $20,000,000 Air Force Osan Air Base Munitions Storage Area Delta (Phase 1) $84,000,000 Defense-Wide Camp Humphreys Elementary School $58,000,000 2512. State of Qatar funded construction projects Pursuant to agreement with the State of Qatar for required in-kind contributions, the Secretary of Defense may accept military construction projects for Al Udeid Air Base in the State of Qatar, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: State of Qatar Funded Construction Projects Component Installation Project Amount Air Force Al Udeid Billet (A12) $63,000,000 Billet (BI2) $63,000,000 Billet (D l 0) $77,000,000 Billet (009) $77,000,000 Billet (007) $77,000,000 Armory/Mount $7,200,000 Billet (A06) $77,000,000 Dining Facility $14,600,000 Billet (BOS) $77,000,000 Billet (B04) $77,000,000 Billet (A04) $77,000,000 Billet (AOS) $77,000,000 Dining Facility $14,600,000 MSG (Base Operations Support Facility) $9,300,000 ITN (Communications Facility) $3,500,000 XXVI Guard and Reserve Forces Facilities 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Army National Guard State Location Amount Arizona National Guard Armory Tucson $18,100,000 Colorado Peterson Air Force Base $15,000,000 Indiana Army Aviation Support Facility Shelbyville $12,000,000 Kentucky Boone National Guard Center Frankfort $15,000,000 Mississippi National Guard Armory Brandon $10,400,000 Nebraska National Guard Armory North Platte $9,300,000 New Jersey Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst $15,000,000 Ohio Beightler Armory Columbus $15,000,000 Oregon Hermiston National Guard Armory $25,035,000 Puerto Rico Fort Allen $37,000,000 South Carolina Joint Base Charleston $15,000,000 Tennessee National Guard Armory McMinnville $11,200,000 Texas National Guard Readiness Center Fort Worth $13,800,000 Utah National Guard Armory Nephi $12,000,000 Virgin Islands LTC Lionel A. Jackson Armory St. Croix $39,400,000 Wisconsin National Guard Armory Appleton $11,600,000 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Army Reserve State Location Amount Florida Reserve Center Gainesville $36,000,000 Massachusetts Devens Reserve Forces Training Area $8,700,000 North Carolina Reserve Center Asheville $24,000,000 Wisconsin Fort McCoy $14,600,000 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out the military construction projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve State Location Amount Maryland Reserve Training Center, Camp Fretterd Reisterstown $39,500,000 Utah Hill Air Force Base $25,010,000 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Air National Guard State Location Amount Alabama Montgomery Regional Airport Air National Guard Base $11,600,000 Guam Joint Region Marianas $20,000,000 Maryland Joint Base Andrews $9,400,000 Texas Joint Base San Antonio $10,800,000 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve location inside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table: Air Force Reserve State Location Amount Texas Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth $14,200,000 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2020, for the costs of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, under chapter 1803 2607. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2020 project In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2601 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 XXVII Base Realignment and Closure Activities 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense base closure account Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2020, for base realignment and closure activities, including real property acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510 10 U.S.C. 2687 Public Law 112–239 XXVIII Military Construction General Provisions A Military Construction Program Changes 2801. Modification and clarification of construction authority in the event of a declaration of war or national emergency (a) Limitation on amount of funds available for national emergency Section 2808 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (e) and (f), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection: (c) Limitation on amount of funds available for national emergency (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), in the event of a declaration by the President of a national emergency in which the construction authority described in subsection (a) is used, the total cost of all military construction projects undertaken using that authority during the national emergency may not exceed $500,000,000. (2) In the event of a national emergency declaration in which the construction authority described in subsection (a) will be used only within the United States, the total cost of all military construction projects undertaken using that authority during the national emergency may not exceed $100,000,000. . (b) Additional conditions on source of funds Section 2808(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the second sentence and inserting the following new subsection: (b) Conditions on sources of funds A military construction project to be undertaken using the construction authority described in subsection (a) may be undertaken only within the total amount of funds that have been appropriated for military construction, including funds appropriated for family housing, that— (1) remain unobligated as of the date on which the first contract would be entered into in connection with that military construction project undertaken using such authority; and (2) are available because the military construction project for which the funds were appropriated— (A) has been canceled; or (B) has reduced costs as a result of project modifications or other cost savings. . (c) Waiver of other provisions of law Section 2808 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after subsection (c), as added by subsection (a), the following new subsection: (d) Waiver of other provisions of law in event of national emergency In the event of a declaration by the President of a national emergency in which the construction authority described in subsection (a) is used, the authority provided by such subsection to waive or disregard another provision of law that would otherwise apply to a military construction project authorized by this section may be used only if— (1) such other provision of law does not provide a means by which compliance with the requirements of the law may be waived, modified, or expedited; and (2) the Secretary of Defense determines that the nature of the national emergency necessitates the noncompliance with the requirements of the law. . (d) Additional notification requirements Subsection (e) of section 2808 of title 10, United States Code, as redesignated by subsection (a)(1), is amended— (1) by striking of the decision of the following: (A) The reasons for the decision to use the construction authority described in subsection (a), including, in the event of a declaration by the President of a national emergency, the reasons why use of the armed forces is required in response to the declared national emergency. (B) The construction projects to be undertaken using the construction authority described in subsection (a), including, in the event of a declaration by the President of a national emergency, an explanation of how each construction project directly supports the immediate security, logistical, or short-term housing and ancillary supporting facility needs of the members of the armed forces used in the national emergency. (C) The estimated cost of the construction projects to be undertaken using the construction authority described in subsection (a), including the cost of any real estate action pertaining to the construction projects, and certification of compliance with the funding conditions imposed by subsections (b) and (c). (D) Any determination made pursuant to subsection (d)(2) to waive or disregard another provision of law to undertake any construction project using the construction authority described in subsection (a). (E) The military construction projects, including any military family housing and ancillary supporting facility projects, whose cancellation, modification, or other cost savings result in funds being available to undertake construction projects using the construction authority described in subsection (a) and the possible impact of the cancellation or modification of such military construction projects on military readiness and the quality of life of members of the armed forces and their dependents. ; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) In the event of a declaration by the President of a national emergency in which the construction authority described in subsection (a) is used, a construction project to be undertaken using such construction authority may be carried out only after the end of the five-day period beginning on the date the notification required by paragraph (1) is received by the appropriate committees of Congress. . (e) Clerical Amendments Section 2808 of title 10, United States Code, is further amended— (1) in subsection (a), by inserting Construction authorized (a) (2) in subsection (e), as redesignated by subsection (a)(1), by inserting Notification requirement (e) (3) in subsection (f), as redesignated by subsection (a)(1), by inserting Termination of authority (f) (f) Exception for pandemic mitigation and response projects Subsections (b), (c), (d) of section 2808 of title 10, United States Code, as added by this section, shall not apply to a military construction project commenced under the authority of subsection (a) of such section 2808 during the emergency period described in section 1135(g)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1320b–5(g)(1)(B) 2802. Extension of sunset for annual locality adjustment of dollar thresholds applicable to unspecified minor military construction authorities Section 2805(f)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 2022 2027 2803. Modification of reporting requirement regarding cost increases associated with certain military construction projects and military family housing projects (a) Elimination of submission to Comptroller General Section 2853(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraphs (1) and (3), by striking and the Comptroller General of the United States (2) by striking paragraph (6). (b) Synchronization of notification requirements Section 2853(c)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after cost increase (subject to subsection (f)) 2804. Expansion of Department of Defense land exchange authority (a) Additional purposes authorized Paragraph (1) of section 2869(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the real property, to transfer the real property— (A) to transfer to the United States all right, title, and interest of the person in and to a parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon under the person’s control; (B) to carry out a land acquisition, including the acquisition of all right, title, and interest or a lesser interest in real property under an agreement entered into under section 2684a of this title to limit encroachments and other constraints on military training, testing, and operations; or (C) to provide installation-support services (as defined in 2679(e) of this title), a replacement facility, or improvements to an existing facility, as agreed upon between the Secretary concerned and the person. . (b) Requirements for Acceptance of Replacement Facilities Section 2869(a) of title 10, United States Code, is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) The Secretary concerned may agree to accept a replacement facility or improvements to an existing facility under paragraph (1)(C) only if the Secretary concerned determines that the replacement facility or improvements— (A) are completed and usable, fully functional, and ready for occupancy; (B) satisfy all operational requirements; and (C) meet all Federal, State, and local requirements applicable to the facility relating to health, safety, and the environment. . (c) Fair market value requirement Section 2869(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the first sentence, by striking of the land to be of the real property, installation-support services, replacement facility, or improvements to an existing facility (2) in the second sentence, by striking of the land is less than the fair market value of the real property to be conveyed of the real property conveyed by the Secretary concerned exceeds the fair market value of the real property, installation-support services, replacement facility, or improvements received by the Secretary (d) Relation to Other Military Construction Requirements Section 2869 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (h) Relation to Other Military Construction Requirements The acquisition of real property or an interest therein, a replacement facility, or improvements to an existing facility using the authority provided by this section shall not be treated as a military construction project for which an authorization is required by section 2802 of this title. . (e) Delayed implementation of amendments The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, but the Secretary concerned (as defined in section 2801(c)(5) of title 10, United States Code) may not enter into any real estate transaction authorized by such amendments until after the date on which the Secretary of Defense issues final regulations providing for the implementation of such amendments by the Department of Defense. 2805. Congressional project authorization required for military construction projects for energy resilience, energy security, and energy conservation (a) Replacement of notice and wait authority Section 2914 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 2914. Military construction projects for energy resilience, energy security, and energy conservation (a) Project authorization required The Secretary of Defense may carry out such military construction projects for energy resilience, energy security, and energy conservation as are authorized by law, using funds appropriated or otherwise made available for that purpose. (b) Submission of project proposals (1) As part of the Department of Defense Form 1391 submitted to the appropriate committees of Congress for a military construction project covered by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall include the following information: (A) The project title. (B) The location of the project. (C) A brief description of the scope of work. (D) The original project cost estimate and the current working cost estimate, if different. (E) Such other information as the Secretary considers appropriate. (2) In the case of a military construction project for energy conservation, the Secretary also shall include the following information: (A) The original expected savings-to-investment ratio and simple payback estimates and measurement and verification cost estimate. (B) The most current expected savings-to-investment ratio and simple payback estimates and measurement and verification plan and costs. (C) A brief description of the measurement and verification plan and planned funding source. (3) In the case of a military construction project for energy resilience or energy security, the Secretary also shall include the rationale for how the project would enhance mission assurance, support mission critical functions, and address known vulnerabilities. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of chapter 173 2914. Military construction projects for energy resilience, energy security, and energy conservation. . 2806. One-year extension of temporary, limited authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects in certain areas outside the United States (a) Extension of authority Subsection (h) of section 2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136 Public Law 115–232 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking December 31, 2020 December 31, 2021 (2) paragraph (2), by striking fiscal year 2021 fiscal year 2022 (b) Continuation of limitation on use of authority Subsection (c) of section 2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136 Public Law 115–232 (1) by striking either each (2) by inserting after the first paragraph (2) the following new subparagraph: (C) The period beginning October 1, 2020, and ending on the earlier of December 31, 2021, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military activities of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2022. . (c) Technical corrections Subsection (c) of section 2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136 Public Law 115–232 (1) by redesignating the second paragraph (1) as subparagraph (A); and (2) by redesignating the first paragraph (2) as subparagraph (B). 2807. Pilot Program to support combatant command military construction priorities (a) Pilot Program The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a pilot program to evaluate the usefulness of reserving a portion of the military construction funds of the military departments to help the combatant commands satisfy their military construction priorities in a timely manner. (b) Location The Secretary of Defense shall conduct the pilot program for the benefit of the United States Indo-Pacific Command in the area of responsibility of the United States Indo-Pacific Command. (c) Required investment For each fiscal year during which the pilot program is conducted, the Secretary of Defense shall reserve to carry out military construction projects under the pilot program an amount equal to 10 percent of the total amount authorized to be appropriated for military construction projects by titles XXI, XXII, and XXIII of the Military Construction Authorization Act for that fiscal year. (d) Commencement and Duration (1) Commencement The Secretary of Defense shall commence the pilot program no later than October 1, 2023. The Secretary may commence the pilot program as early as October 1, 2022, if the Secretary determines that compliance with the reservation of funds requirement under subsection (c) is practicable beginning with fiscal year 2023. (2) Duration The pilot program shall be in effect for the fiscal year in which the Secretary commences the pilot program, as described in paragraph (1), and the subsequent two fiscal years. Any construction commenced under the pilot program before the expiration date may continue to completion. (e) Progress report Not later than February 15 of the final fiscal year of the pilot program, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report evaluating the success of the pilot program in improving the timeliness of the United States Indo-Pacific Command in achieving its military construction priorities. The Secretary shall include in the report— (1) an evaluation of the likely positive and negative impacts were the pilot program extended or made permanent and, if extended or made permanent, the likely positive and negative impacts of expansion to cover all or additional combatant commands; and (2) the recommendations of the Secretary regarding whether the pilot program should be extended or made permanent and expanded. 2808. Biannual report regarding military installations supported by disaster relief appropriations (a) Report required Biannually through September 30, 2025, both the Secretary of the Air Force and the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the relevant congressional committees a report regarding the obligation and expenditure at military installations under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned of appropriations made available to the Secretary concerned in title V of the Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2020 (division F of Public Law 116–94 (b) Elements of report Each report under subsection (a) shall include for the period covered by the report the following elements: (1) The timeline for award of contracts for each military construction project to be funded with appropriations referred to in subsection (a). (2) The status, including obligations and expenditures, of each contract already awarded for such military construction projects. (3) An assessment of the contracting capacity of the communities in the vicinity of such military installations to support such contracts. (4) The expectations that such local communities will be required to address. (c) Public Availability of report The information in each report specific to a particular military installation shall be made available online using a public forum commonly used in the locality in which the installation is located. (d) Early termination Notwithstanding the date specified in subsection (a), the Secretary of the Air Force and the Secretary of the Navy may terminate the reporting requirement applicable to the Secretary concerned under such subsection effective on the date on which the Secretary concerned certifies to the relevant congressional committees that at least 90 percent of the appropriations referred to in such subsection and made available to the Secretary concerned have been expended. (e) Relevant congressional committees defined In this section, the term relevant congressional committees (1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Subcommittee on Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Subcommittee on Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies of the Senate. B Military Family Housing Reforms 2811. Expenditure priorities in using Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund (a) In general Section 2883(d)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting (A) (1) (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (B) The Secretary of Defense shall require that eligible entities receiving amounts from the Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund prioritize the use of such amounts for expenditures related to operating expenses, debt payments, and asset recapitalization before other program management-incentive fee expenditures. . (b) Effective date The requirements set forth in subparagraph (B) of section 2883(d)(1) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply to appropriate legal documents entered into or renewed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act between the Secretary of a military department and a landlord regarding privatized military housing. In this subsection, the terms landlord privatized military housing Public Law 116–92 10 U.S.C. 2821 2812. Promulgation of guidance to facilitate return of military families displaced from privatized military housing (a) Guidance required The Secretary of Defense shall promulgate guidance for commanders of military installations and installation housing management offices to facilitate and manage the return of tenants who are displaced from privatized military housing— (1) as a result of an environmental hazard or other damage adversely affecting the habitability of the privatized military housing; or (2) during remediation or repair activities in response to the hazard or damages. (b) Availability of reimbursement As part of the guidance, the Secretary of Defense shall identify situations in which a tenant of privatized military housing should be reimbursed for losses to personal property of the tenant that are not covered by insurance and are incurred by the tenant in the situations described in subsection (a). (c) Consultation The Secretary of Defense shall promulgate the guidance in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, the Chief Housing Officer, landlords, and other interested persons. (d) Implementation The Secretaries of the military departments shall be responsible for ensuring the implementation of the guidance at military installations under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned. (e) Definitions In this section, the terms landlord privatized military housing tenant Public Law 116–92 10 U.S.C. 2821 2813. Promulgation of guidance on mold mitigation in privatized military housing (a) Guidance required The Secretary of Defense shall establish a working group to promulgate guidance regarding best practices for mold mitigation in privatized military housing and for making the determination regarding when the presence of mold in a unit of home privatized military housing is an emergency situation requiring the relocation of the residents of the unit. (b) Members The working groups shall include the Surgeon Generals of the Armed Forces and such other subject-matter experts as the Secretary considers appropriate. 2814. Expansion of uniform code of basic standards for privatized military housing and hazard and habitability inspection and assessment requirements to Government-owned and Government-controlled military family housing (a) Uniform code of basic standards for military housing The Secretary of Defense shall expand the uniform code of basic housing standards for safety, comfort, and habitability for privatized military housing established pursuant to section 3051(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (division B of Public Law 116–92 10 U.S.C. 2871 (b) Inspection and assessment plan The Secretary of Defense shall expand the Department of Defense housing inspection and assessment plan prepared pursuant to section 3051(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (division B of Public Law 116–92 10 U.S.C. 2871 2815. Establishment of Exceptional Family Member Program housing liaison (a) Establishment Not later than September 30, 2021, each Secretary of a military department shall appoint at least one Exceptional Family Member Program housing liaison for that military department. (b) Duties The duties of a Exceptional Family Member Program housing liaison are to assist military families enrolled in that Program, and who are disproportionally housed in facilities under the Military Housing Privatization Initiative, in obtaining cost-effective services needed by such families. 2816. Department of Defense report on criteria and metrics used to evaluate performance of landlords of privatized military housing that receive incentive fees (a) Report required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report— (1) describing the criteria and metrics currently used by the Department of Defense to analyze the performance of landlords that receive incentive fees; and (2) evaluating the effectiveness of such criteria and metrics in accurately judging the performance of such landlords; and (3) containing such recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate to revise such criteria and metrics to better evaluate the performance of such landlords. (b) Preparation of report To prepare the report required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense first shall solicit the views of the Secretaries of the military departments. (c) Definitions In this section, the terms incentive fees landlord 2817. Report on Department of Defense efforts regarding oversight and role in management of privatized military housing Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the progress made by the Department of Defense in implementing the recommendations contained in the report of the Comptroller General regarding military housing entitled DOD Needs to Strengthen Oversight and Clarify Its Role in the Management of Privatized Housing C Real Property and Facilities Administration 2821. Codification of reporting requirements regarding United States overseas military enduring locations and contingency locations (a) Inclusion of information in existing annual report Section 2687a(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the subsection heading, by striking Master Plans overseas military locations (2) in paragraph (1), by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following new subparagraph: (B) overseas military locations, whether such a location is designated as an enduring location or contingency location. ; and (3) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraphs: (2) To satisfy the reporting requirement specified in paragraph (1)(B), a report under paragraph (1) shall contain the following: (A) A description of the strategic goal and operational requirements supported by each overseas military location. (B) A summary of the terms of agreements for each overseas military location, including— (i) the type of implementing agreement; (ii) any annual lease or access costs to the United States under the agreement; and (iii) any limitation on United States military presence, activities, or operations at the overseas military location. (C) A list of all infrastructure investments made at each overseas military location during the previous fiscal year, delineated by project location, project title or description, cost of project, any amount paid by a host nation to cover all or part of the project cost, and authority used to undertake the project. (D) A list of all infrastructure requirements for each overseas military location anticipated during the fiscal year in which the report is submitted and the next four fiscal years, delineated as described in subparagraph (C). (E) A list of any overseas military locations newly established during the previous fiscal year. (F) A description of any plans to transition an existing contingency overseas military location to an enduring overseas military location or to upgrade or downgrade the designation of an existing enduring or contingency overseas military location during the fiscal year in which the report is submitted or the next four fiscal years. (G) A list of any overseas military locations that, during the previous fiscal year, were transferred to the control of security forces of the host country or another military force, closed, or for any other reason no longer used by the armed forces, including a summary of any costs associated with the transfer or closure of the overseas military location. (H) A summary of the impact that the establishment or maintenance of each overseas military location has on security commitments undertaken by the United States pursuant to any international security treaty or the current security environments in the combatant commands, including United States participation in theater security cooperation activities and bilateral partnership, exchanges, and training exercises. (I) A summary of any force protection risks identified for each overseas military location, the actions proposed to mitigate such risks, and the resourcing and implementation plan to implement the mitigation actions. (J) An assessment of force protection measures by host nations for each overseas military location and recommendations to mitigate any potential risks identified. (K) Such other such matters related to overseas military locations as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate. (3) (A) In this subsection, the term overseas military location (B) An enduring location is primarily characterized either by the presence of permanently assigned United States forces with robust infrastructure and quality of life amenities to support that presence, by the sustained presence of allocated United States forces with infrastructure and quality of life amenities consistent with that presence, or by the periodic presence of allocated U.S. forces with little or no permanent United States military presence or controlled infrastructure. Enduring locations include main operating bases, forward operating sites, and cooperative security locations. (C) A contingency location refers to a location outside of the United States that is not covered by subparagraph (B), but that is used by United States forces to support and sustain operations during named and unnamed contingency operations or other operations as directed by appropriate authority and is categorized by mission life-cycle requirements as initial, temporary, or semi-permanent. (4) The Secretary of Defense shall prepare the report under paragraph (1) in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. (5) A report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex as necessary. . (b) Conforming and Clerical Amendments (1) Conforming amendments Section 2687a(e)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking host nation host country (2) Section heading The heading of section 2687a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 2687a. Overseas base closures and realignments and status of United States overseas military locations . (3) Table of sections The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 159 2687a. Overseas base closures and realignments and status of United States overseas military locations. . (c) Repeal of superceded reporting requirement Section 2816 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (division B of Public Law 114–92 2822. Limitations on renewal of utility privatization contracts (a) Contract renewal authority Section 2688(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting (A) (2) (2) by inserting after the first sentence the following new subparagraph: (B) A longer-term contract entered into under the authority of subparagraph (A) may be renewed in the manner provided in such subparagraph, except that such a contract renewal may only be awarded during the final five years of the existing contract term. . (b) Conforming amendments Section 2688(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is further amended— (1) by striking The determination of cost effectiveness (C) A determination of cost effectiveness under this paragraph ; and (2) by striking the contract the contract or contract renewal 2823. Vesting exercise of discretion with Service Secretaries regarding entering into longer-term contracts for utility services Section 2688(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 2822, is further amended— (1) by striking The Secretary of Defense, or the designee of the Secretary, The Secretary concerned (2) by striking if the Secretary if the Secretary concerned 2824. Use of on-site energy production to promote military installation energy resilience and energy security (a) Promotion of on-Site energy security and energy resilience Section 2911 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (h) Promotion of on-Site energy security and energy resilience (1) Consistent with the energy security and resilience goals of the Department of Defense and the energy performance master plan referred to in this section, the Secretary concerned shall consider, when feasible, projects for the production of installation energy that benefits military readiness and promotes installation energy security and energy resilience in the following manner: (A) Location of the energy-production infrastructure on the military installation that will consume the energy. (B) Incorporation of energy resilience features, such as microgrids, to ensure that energy remains available to the installation even when the installation is not connected to energy sources located off the installation. (C) Reduction in periodic refueling needs from sources off the installation to not more than once every two years. (3) In this subsection, the term microgrid . (b) Evaluation of feasibility of expanding use of on-site energy production (1) Projects authorized Subsection (h) of section 2911 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), is amended by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph: (2) (A) Using amounts made available for military construction projects under section 2914 of this title, the Secretary of Defense shall carry out at least four projects to promote installation energy security and energy resilience in the manner described in paragraph (1). (B) At least one project shall be designed to develop technology that demonstrates the ability to connect an existing on-site energy generation facility that uses solar power with one or more installation facilities performing critical missions in a manner that allows the generation facility to continue to provide electrical power to these facilities even if the installation is disconnected from the commercial power supply. (C) At least one project shall be designed to develop technology that demonstrates that one or more installation facilities performing critical missions can be isolated, for purposes of electrical power supply, from the remainder of the installation and from the commercial power supply in a manner that allows an on-site energy generation facility that uses a renewable energy source, other than solar energy, to provide the necessary power exclusively to these facilities. (D) At least two projects shall be designed to develop technology that demonstrates the ability to store sufficient electrical energy from an on-site energy generation facility that uses a renewable energy source to provide the electrical energy required to continue operation of installation facilities performing critical missions during nighttime operations. (E) The Secretary of Defense may not select as the site of a project under this paragraph a military installation that already has the ability to satisfy any of the project requirements described in subparagraphs (B), (C), or (D). (F) The authority of the Secretary of Defense to commence a project under this paragraph expires on September 30, 2025. . (2) Briefing Not later than March 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall brief the congressional defense committees regarding the plan to carry out the on-site energy production projects authorized by paragraph (2) of section 2911 of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1). 2825. Availability of Energy Resilience and Conservation Investment Program funds for certain activities related to privatized utility systems Section 2914(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting (1) The Secretary of Defense (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) For purposes of this section, a military construction project is deemed to include activities related to utility systems authorized under subsections (h), (j), and (k) of section 2688 or section 2913 of this title, notwithstanding that the United States does not own the utility system, and energy-related activities included as a separate requirement in an energy savings performance contract (as defined in section 804(3) of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act ( 42 U.S.C. 8287c(3) . 2826. Improving water management and security on military installations (a) Risk-based approach to installation water management and security (1) General requirement The Secretary concerned shall adopt a risk-based approach to water management and security for each military installation under the jurisdiction of the Secretary. (2) Implementation priorities The Secretary concerned shall begin implementation of paragraph (1) by prioritizing those military installations under the jurisdiction of the Secretary that the Secretary determines— (A) are experiencing the greatest risks to sustainable water management and security; and (B) face the most severe existing or potential adverse impacts to mission assurance as a result of such risks. (3) Determination method Determinations under paragraph (2) shall be made on the basis of the water management and security assessments made by the Secretary concerned under subsection (b). (b) Water management and security assessments (1) Assessment methodology The Secretaries concerned, acting jointly, shall develop a methodology to assess risks to sustainable water management and security and mission assurance. (2) Elements Required elements of the assessment methodology shall include the following: (A) An evaluation of the water sources and supply connections for a military installation, including water flow rate and extent of competition for the water sources. (B) An evaluation of the age, condition, and jurisdictional control of water infrastructure serving the military installation. (C) An evaluation of the military installation’s water-security risks related to drought-prone climates, impacts of defense water usage on regional water demands, water quality, and legal issues, such as water rights disputes. (D) An evaluation of the resiliency of the military installation’s water supply and the overall health of the aquifer basin of which the water supply is a part, including the robustness of the resource, redundancy, and ability to recover from disruption. (E) An evaluation of existing water metering and consumption at the military installation, considered at a minimum— (i) by type of installation activity, such as training, maintenance, medical, housing, and grounds maintenance and landscaping; and (ii) by fluctuations in consumption, including peak consumption by quarter. (c) Evaluation of installations for potential net zero water usage (1) Evaluation required The Secretary concerned shall conduct an evaluation of each military installation under the jurisdiction of the Secretary to determine the potential for the military installation, or at a minimum certain installation activities, to achieve net zero water usage. (2) Elements Required elements of each evaluation shall include the following: (A) An evaluation of alternative water sources to offset use of freshwater, including water recycling and harvested rainwater for use as non-potable water. (B) An evaluation of the practicality of implementing Department of Energy guidelines for net zero water usage, when practicable to minimize water consumption and wastewater discharge in buildings scheduled for renovation. (C) An evaluation of the practicality of implementing net zero water usage technology into new construction in water-constrained areas, as determined by water management and security assessments conducted under subsection (b). (d) Improved Landscaping management practices (1) Landscaping management The Secretary concerned shall implement, to the maximum extent practicable, at each military installation under the jurisdiction of the Secretary landscaping management practices to increase water resilience and ensure greater quantities of water availability for operational, training, and maintenance requirements. (2) Arid or semi-arid climates For military installations located in arid or semi-arid climates, landscaping management practices shall include the use of xeriscaping. (3) Non-arid climates For military installations located in arid or non-arid climates, landscaping management practices shall include the use of plants common to the region in which the installation is located and native grasses and plants. (4) Pollinator Conservation Reference Guide The Secretary concerned shall follow the recommendations of the Department of Defense Pollinator Conservation Reference Guide (September 2018) to the maximum extent practicable in order to reduce operation and maintenance costs related to landscaping management, while improving area management. Consistent with such guide, in the preparation of a military installation landscaping plan, the Secretary concerned should consider the following: (A) Adding native flowering plants to sunny open areas and removing overhanging tree limbs above open patches within forested areas or dense shrub. (B) Removing or controlling invasive plants to improve pollinator habitat. (C) Preserving known and potential pollinator nesting and overwintering sites. (D) Eliminating or minimizing pesticide use in pollinator habitat areas. (E) Mowing in late fall or winter after plants have bloomed and set seed, adjusting timing to avoid vulnerable life stages of special status pollinators. (F) Mowing mid-day when adult pollinators can avoid mowing equipment. (e) Implementation report (1) Report required Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the other Secretaries concerned, shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the progress made in implementing this section. (2) Report elements The report shall include the following: (A) The methodology developed under subsection (b) to conduct water management and security assessments. (B) A list of the military installations that have been assessed using such methodology and a description of the findings. (C) A list of planned assessments for the one-year period beginning on the date of the submission of the report. (D) An evaluation of the progress made on implementation of xeriscaping and other regionally appropriate landscaping practices at military installations. (f) Definitions In this section: (1) The term net zero water usage (2) The terms Secretary concerned Secretary (3) The term xeriscaping 2827. Pilot program to test use of emergency diesel generators in a microgrid configuration at certain military installations (a) Pilot program authorized The Secretary of Defense may conduct a pilot program (to be known as the Emergency Diesel Generator Microgrid Program) to evaluate the feasibility and cost effectiveness of connecting existing diesel generators at a military installation selected pursuant to subsection (c) to create and support one or more microgrid configurations at the installation capable of providing full-scale electrical power for the defense critical facilities located at the installation during an emergency involving the loss of external electric power supply caused by an extreme weather condition, manmade intentional infrastructure damage, or other circumstances. (b) Goal of pilot program The goals of the Emergency Diesel Generator Microgrid Program are— (1) to test assumptions about lower operating and maintenance costs, parts interchangeability, lower emissions, lower fuel usage, increased resiliency, increased reliability, and reduced need for emergency diesel generators; and (2) to establish design criteria that could be used to build and sustain emergency diesel generator microgrids at other military installations. (c) Pilot program locations As the locations to conduct the Emergency Diesel Generator Microgrid Program, the Secretary of Defense shall select two major military installations located in different geographical regions of the United States that the Secretary determines— (1) are defense critical electric infrastructure sites or contain, or are served by, defense critical electric infrastructure; (2) contain more than one defense critical function for national defense purposes and the mission assurance of such critical defense facilities are paramount to maintaining national defense and force projection capabilities at all times; and (3) face unique electric energy supply, delivery, and distribution challenges that, based on the geographic location of the installations and the overall physical size of the installations, adversely impact rapid electric infrastructure restoration after an interruption. (d) Specifications of diesel generators and microgrid (1) Generator specifications The Secretary of Defense shall use existing diesel generators that are sized >/= 750kW output. (2) Microgrid specifications The Secretary of Defense shall create the microgrid using commercially available and proven designs and technologies. The existing diesel generators used for the microgrid should be spaced within 1.0 to 1.5 mile of each other and, using a dedicated underground electric cable network, be tied into a microgrid configuration sufficient to supply mission critical facilities within the service area of the microgrid. A selected military installation may contain more than one such microgrid under the Emergency Diesel Generator Microgrid Program. (e) Program authorities The Secretary of Defense may use the authority under section 2914 of title 10, United States Code (known as the Energy Resilience and Conservation Investment Program) and energy savings performance contracts to conduct the Emergency Diesel Generator Microgrid Program. (f) Definitions For purposes of the Emergency Diesel Generator Microgrid Program: (1) The term defense critical electric infrastructure 16 U.S.C. 824o–1 (2) The term energy savings performance contract 42 U.S.C. 8287c(3) (3) The term existing diesel generators (4) The term major military installation 2828. Improved electrical metering of Department of Defense infrastructure supporting critical missions (a) Options to improve electrical metering The Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the military departments shall improve the metering of electrical energy usage of covered defense structures to accurately determine energy consumption by such a structure to increase energy efficiency and improve energy resilience, using any combination of the options specified in subsection (b) or such other methods as the Secretary concerned considers practicable. (b) Metering options Electrical energy usage options to be considered for a covered defense structure include the following: (1) Installation of a smart meter at the electric power supply cable entry point of the covered defense structure, with remote data storage and retrieval capability using cellular communication, to provide historical energy usage data on an hourly basis to accurately determine the optimum cost effective energy efficiency and energy resilience measures for the covered defense structure. (2) Use of an energy usage audit firm to individually meter the covered defense structure using clamp-on meters and data storage to provide year–long electric energy load profile data, particularly in the case of a covered defense structure located in climates with highly variable use based on weather or temperature changes to accurately identify electric energy usage demand for both peak and off peak periods for a covered defense structure. (3) Manual collection and calculation of the connected load via nameplate data survey of all the connected electrical devices for the covered defense structure and comparing it to the designed maximum rating of the incoming electric supply to determine the maximum electrical load for the covered defense structure. (c) Consideration of partnerships The Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the military departments shall consider the use of arrangements (known as public-private partnerships) with appropriate entities outside the Government to reduce the cost of carrying out this section. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) The term covered defense structure (A) is used to support a critical mission of the Department; and (B) is located at a military installation with base-wide resilient power. (2) The term energy resilience (e) Implementation report As part of the Department of Defense energy management report to be submitted under section 2925 of title 10, United States Code, during fiscal year 2022, the Secretary of Defense shall include information on the progress being made to comply with the requirements of this section. 2829. Renaming certain military installations and other defense property (a) Definitions In this section: (1) The term advisory panel (2) The term covered defense property (3) The term covered military installation (4) The term identification report (5) The term military installation (6) The term other improvement (7) The term process report (8) The term renaming report (9) The term reserve component facility facility (10) The term Secretary concerned (b) Renaming required; deadline Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary concerned shall— (1) complete the renaming process required by this section; and (2) commence the renaming of each covered military installation and covered defense property identified in the renaming report pursuant to the guidance issued by the Secretary concerned under subsection (f). (c) Identification report; deadline Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, each Secretary concerned shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that identifies each covered military installation and all covered defense property under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned that the Secretary concerned determines satisfies the definitions given those terms in subsection (a). (d) Process report; deadline (1) Report required Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, each Secretary concerned shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the process by which the Secretary concerned will rename each covered military installation and covered defense property identified in the renaming report prepared by the Secretary concerned. (2) Report elements At minimum, the process report shall contain the following elements: (A) A detailed description of the process to be used by the Secretary concerned to develop a list of potential names for renaming covered military installations and covered defense property. (B) An explanation regarding whether or not the Secretary concerned established, or will establish, an advisory panel to support the review process and make recommendations to the Secretary concerned. If the Secretary concerned has established, or will establish, an advisory panel, the report shall include the names and positions of the individuals who will serve on the advisory panel that represent: (i) Military leadership from covered military installations. (ii) Military leadership from military installations containing covered defense property.. (iii) State leaders and leaders of the locality in which a covered military installation or covered defense property is located. (iv) Representatives from military museums, military historians, or relevant historians from the impacted States and localities with relevant expertise. (v) Community civil rights leaders. (C) The criteria the Secretary concerned will use to inform the renaming process. (D) A description of the process for accepting and considering public comments from members of the Armed Forces, veterans, and members of the local community on potential names for renaming covered military installations and covered defense property. (E) A timeline for the renaming process consistent with the deadline specified in subsection (b). (e) Congressional guidance on renaming criteria (1) Preferences As part of the renaming process established by the Secretary concerned and described in the process report required by subsection (c), the Secretary concerned shall give a preference for renaming covered military installations and covered defense property after either— (A) a battlefield victory by the Armed Forces consistent with current Department of Defense naming conventions; or (B) a deceased member of the Armed Forces who satisfies one of more of the following: (i) Was a recipient of the Congressional Medal of Honor. (ii) Was recognized for heroism in combat or for other significant contributions to the United States. (iii) Was a member of a minority group who overcame prejudice and adversity to perform distinguished military service. (iv) Has links to the community or State where the military installation or covered property is located. (v) Served at the covered military installation, in a unit of the Armed Forces based at the covered installation; or at the military installation containing the covered defense property. (2) Other considerations (A) Junior servicemembers Junior members of the Armed Forces should be favored in the renaming process over general officers or flag officers. (B) Branch consideration A deceased member of the Armed Forces whose name is selected in the renaming process should have served in the same Armed Force as the majority of the members of the Armed Forces stationed at the covered military installation renamed in honor of the deceased member or at which the renamed covered defense property is located. (C) Conflict consideration The names selected in the renaming process should recognize and reflect significant battles or contingency operations since 1917 or the contributions of members of the Armed Forces who served in wars and contingency operations since 1917. (D) Personal conduct A deceased member of the Armed Forces whose name is selected in the renaming process should be a person whose personal conduct reflects the current values of the Armed Forces and its members. (f) Renaming report; deadline (1) Report required Upon completing the renaming process identified in the process report, but not later than 30 days before the deadline specified in subsection (b), each Secretary concerned shall submit to the congressional defense committees a final report containing the list of the new names chosen for each covered military installation and covered defense property identified in the identification report prepared by the Secretary concerned. (2) Report elements At minimum, the renaming report shall contain an explanation of the reasons for the selection of each new name chosen for covered military installations and covered defense property. (3) Public availability The Secretary concerned shall make the renaming report publicly available as soon as practicable after submission of the renaming report. (3) Guidance for actual renaming Not later than 30 days after submission of the renaming report, the Secretary concerned shall issue guidance to promptly affect the name changes contained in the renaming report. (g) Savings clause Nothing in this section or the renaming process required by this section shall be construed to have any effect on grave markers or cemeteries that may exist on real property under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense. D Land Conveyances 2831. Land conveyance, Camp Navajo, Arizona (a) Conveyance authorized The Secretary of the Army may convey, without consideration, to the State of Arizona Department of Emergency and Military Affairs (in this section referred to as the State (1) for training the Arizona Army National Guard and Air National Guard; and (2) for defense industrial base economic development purposes that are compatible with the environmental security and primary National Guard training purpose of Camp Navajo. (b) Condition of conveyance (1) Use of revenues The authority of the Secretary of the Army to make the conveyance described in subsection (a) is subject to the condition that the State agree that all revenues generated from the use of the property conveyed under such subsection will be used to support the training requirements of the Arizona Army National Guard and Air National Guard, including necessary infrastructure maintenance and capital improvements. (2) Audit The United States Property and Fiscal Office for Arizona shall— (A) conduct periodic audits of all revenues generated by uses of the conveyed property and the use of such revenues; and (B) provide the audit results to the Chief of the National Guard Bureau. (c) Reversionary interest (1) Interest retained If the Secretary of the Army determines at any time that the property conveyed under subsection (a) is not being used in accordance with the purposes of the conveyance specified in such subsection, or that the State has not complied with the condition imposed by subsection (b), all right, title, and interest in and to the conveyed property, including any improvements thereon, shall, at the option of the Secretary, revert to and become the property of the United States, and the United States shall have the right of immediate entry onto the Property. (2) Determination A determination by the Secretary under this subsection shall be made on the record after an opportunity for a hearing. (d) Alternative consideration option (1) Consideration option In lieu of exercising the reversionary interest retained under subsection (c), the Secretary of the Army may accept an offer by the State to pay to the United States an amount equal to the fair market value of the property conveyed under subsection (a), excluding the value of any improvements on the conveyed property constructed without Federal funds after the date of the conveyance is completed, as determined by the Secretary. (2) Treatment of consideration received Consideration received by the Secretary under paragraph (1) shall be deposited in the special account in the Treasury established for the Secretary under subsection (e) of section 2667 of title 10, United States Code, and shall be available to the Secretary for the same uses and subject to the same limitations as provided in that section. (e) Payment of costs of conveyance (1) Payment required The Secretary of the Army shall require the State to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation related to the conveyance, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the State in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the State. (2) Treatment of amounts received Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance or, if the period of availability for obligations for that appropriation has expired, to the fund or account currently available to the Secretary for the same purpose. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account. (f) Description of property The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army. (g) Savings provision Nothing in this section shall be construed to alleviate, alter, or affect the responsibility of the United States for cleanup and remediation of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) in accordance with the Defense Environmental Restoration Program under section 2701 of title 10, United States Code, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 ( 42 U.S.C. 9601 (h) Additional terms and conditions The Secretary of the Army may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. These additional terms may include a requirement for the State to consult with the Secretary of the Navy regarding use of the conveyed property. 2832. Modification of land exchange involving Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant, Sunnyvale, California (a) Elements of exchange Section 2841(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 115–91 (1) real property, including improvements thereon, located in Titusville, Florida, that will replace the NIROP and meet the readiness requirements of the Department of the Navy, as determined by the Secretary; and (2) reimbursement for the costs of relocation of contractor and Government personnel and equipment from the NIROP to the replacement facilities, to the extent specified in the land exchange agreement contemplated in subsection (b). . (b) Elements of land exchange agreement Section 2841(b)(1) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 115–91 identifies the costs of relocation to be reimbursed by the Exchange Entity, (c) Valuation of properties and compensation Section 2841 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 115–91 (1) by striking subsection (c); (2) by redesignating subsections (d) through (i) as subsections (e) through (j), respectively; and (3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsections: (c) Valuation The Secretary shall determine the fair market value of the properties, including improvements thereon, to be exchanged by the Secretary and the Exchange Entity under subsection (a). (d) Compensation (1) Compensation required The Exchange Entity shall provide compensation under the land exchange agreement described in subsection (b) that is equal to or exceeds the fair market value of the NIROP, as determined under subsection (c). (2) In-kind consideration As part of the compensation under the land exchange agreement, the Secretary and the Exchange Entity may agree for the Exchange Entity to provide the following forms of in-kind consideration at any property or facility under the control of the Secretary: (A) Alteration, repair, improvement, or restoration (including environmental restoration) of property. (B) Use of facilities by the Secretary. (C) Provision of real property maintenance services. (D) Provision of or payment of utility services. (E) Provision of such other services relating to activities that will occur on the property as the Secretary considers appropriate. (3) Deposit The Secretary shall deposit any cash payments received under the land exchange agreement, other than cash payments accepted under section 2695 of title 10, United States Code, in the account in the Treasury established pursuant to section 572(b) of title 40, United States Code. (4) Use of proceeds Proceeds deposited pursuant to paragraph (3) in the account referred to in such paragraph shall be available to the Secretary in such amounts as provided in appropriations Acts for the following activities: (A) Maintenance, protection, alternation, repair, improvement, or restoration (including environmental restoration) of property or facilities. (B) Payment of utilities services. (C) Real property maintenance services. . (d) Treatment of certain amounts received Subsection (f) of section 2841 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 115–91 (a), (c)(2), and (d) (a) and (e) (e) Sunset Subsection (j) of section 2841 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 115–91 October 1, 2023 October 1, 2026, if the Secretary and the Exchange Entity have not entered into a land exchange agreement described in subsection (b) before that date 2833. Land conveyance, Sharpe Army Depot, lathrop, California (a) Conveyance authorized If the Secretary of the Army determines that no department or agency of the Federal Government will accept the transfer of a parcel of real property consisting of approximately 525 acres at Sharpe Army Depot in Lathrop, California, the Secretary may convey to the Port of Stockton, California, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the property, including any improvements thereon, for the purpose of permitting the Port of Stockton to use the property for the development or operation of a port facility. (b) Modification of parcel authorized for conveyance If a department or agency of the Federal Government will accept the transfer of a portion of the parcel of real property described in subsection (a), the Secretary shall modify the conveyance authorized by such subsection to exclude the portion of the parcel to be accepted by that department or agency. (c) Consideration (1) Public benefit conveyance The Secretary of the Army may assign the property for conveyance under subsection (a) as a public benefit conveyance without monetary consideration to the Federal Government if the Port of Stockton satisfies the conveyance requirements specified in section 554 of title 40, United States Code. (2) Fair market value If the Port of Stockton fails to qualify for a public benefit conveyance under paragraph (1) and still desires to acquire the real property described in subsection (a), the Port of Stockton shall pay to the United States an amount equal to the fair market value of the property to be conveyed. The Secretary shall determine the fair market value of the property using an independent appraisal based on the highest and best use of the property. (d) Description of Property The exact acreage and legal description of the real property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army. The cost of the survey shall be borne by the Port of Stockton. (e) Additional Terms and conditions The Secretary of the Army may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. (f) Sunset If the real property authorized for conveyance by subsection (a) is not conveyed within one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army may report the property excess for disposal in accordance with existing law. 2834. Land exchange, San Bernardino County, California (a) Definitions In this section: (1) County The term County (2) Federal land The term Federal land Federal Land Proposed for Exchange Big Bear Land Exchange (3) Non-federal land The term non-Federal land Non-Federal Land Proposed for Exchange (b) Exchange authorized Subject to valid existing rights and the terms of this section, no later than one year after the date that the portion of the Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail is relocated in accordance with subsection (i), if the County offers to convey the non-Federal land to the United States, the Secretary of Agriculture shall— (1) convey to the County all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the Federal land; and (2) accept from the County a conveyance of all right, title, and interest of the County in and to the non-Federal land. (c) Equal value and cash equalization (1) Equal value exchange The land exchange under this section shall be for equal value, or the values shall be equalized by a cash payment as provided for under this subsection or an adjustment in acreage. At the option of the County, any excess value of the non-Federal lands may be considered a gift to the United States. (2) Cash equalization payment The County may equalize the values of the lands to be exchanged under this section by cash payment without regard to any statutory limit on the amount of such a cash equalization payment. (3) Deposit and use of funds received from county Any cash equalization payment received by the Secretary of Agriculture under this subsection shall be deposited in the fund established under Public Law 90–171 16 U.S.C. 484a (d) Appraisal The Secretary of Agriculture shall complete an appraisal of the land to be exchanged under this section in accordance with— (1) the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions; and (2) the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. (e) Title approval Title to the land to be exchanged under this section shall be in a format acceptable to the Secretary of Agriculture and the County. (f) Survey of non-Federal lands Before completing the exchange under this section, the Secretary of Agriculture shall inspect the non-Federal lands to ensure that the land meets Federal standards, including hazardous materials and land line surveys. (g) Costs of conveyance As a condition of the conveyance of the Federal land under this section, any costs related to the exchange under this section shall be paid by the County. (h) Management of acquired lands The Secretary of Agriculture shall manage the non-Federal land acquired under this section in accordance with the Act of March 1, 1911 ( 16 U.S.C. 480 (i) Pacific crest national scenic trail relocation No later than three years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture, in accordance with applicable laws, shall relocate the portion of the Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail located on the Federal land— (1) to adjacent National Forest System land; (2) to land owned by the County, subject to County approval; (3) to land within the Federal land, subject to County approval; or (4) in a manner that combines two or more of the options described in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3). (j) Map and legal descriptions As soon as practicable after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall finalize a map and legal descriptions of all land to be conveyed under this section. The Secretary may correct any minor errors in the map or in the legal descriptions. The map and legal descriptions shall be on file and available for public inspection in appropriate offices of the Forest Service. 2835. Land conveyance, Over-the-Horizon Backscatter Radar System receiving station, Modoc County, California (a) Conveyance required (1) In general As soon as practicable after receiving a request from Modoc County, California (in this section referred to as the County (2) Applicable law and National security determination The Secretary of Agriculture shall carry out the conveyance under subsection (a) in accordance with this section and all other applicable law, including the condition that the conveyance not take place until the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Air Force, determines that the conveyance will not harm the national security interests of the United States. (b) Purpose of conveyance The purpose of the conveyance under subsection (a) is to preserve and utilize the improvements constructed on the parcel of National Forest System land described in such subsection and to permit the County to use the conveyed property, including improvements thereon, for the development of renewable energy, including solar and biomass cogeneration. (c) Consideration (1) In general As consideration for the conveyance under subsection (a), the County shall pay to the Secretary of Agriculture an amount that is not less than the fair market value of the parcel of land to be conveyed, as determined in accordance with the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisition and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. (2) Treatment of cash consideration The Secretary shall deposit the payment received under paragraph (1) in the account in the Treasury established by Public Law 90–171 16 U.S.C. 484a (d) Reservation of easement related to Continued use of water wells The conveyance required by subsection (a) shall be conditioned on the reservation of an easement by the Secretary of Agriculture, subject to such terms and conditions as the Secretary deems appropriate, necessary to provide access for use authorized by the Secretary of the four water wells in existence on the date of the enactment of this Act and associated water conveyance infrastructure on the parcel of National Forest System lands to be conveyed. (e) Withdrawal The National Forest System land described in subsection (a) is withdrawn from the operation of the mining and mineral leasing laws of the United States. (f) Payment of costs of conveyance (1) Payment required The Secretary of Agriculture shall require the County to cover costs (except costs for environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the County in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the County. (2) Treatment of amounts received Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary of Agriculture in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account. (g) Environmental remediation (1) In general To expedite the conveyance of the parcel of National Forest System land described in subsection (a), including improvements thereon, environmental remediation of the land by the Department of the Air Force shall be limited to the removal of the perimeter wooden fence, which was treated with an arsenic-based weatherproof coating, and treatment of soil affected by leaching of such chemical. (2) Potential Future Environmental remediation Responsibilities Notwithstanding the conveyance of the parcel of National Forest System land described in subsection (a), the Secretary of the Air Force shall be responsible for the remediation of any environmental contamination, discovered post-conveyance, that is attributed to Air Force occupancy of and operations on the parcel pre-conveyance. (h) Compliance with environmental laws Notwithstanding the requirements of section 120(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 ( 42 U.S.C. 9620(h) (i) Description of property The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of Agriculture. 2836. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Naval Support Activity Panama City, Florida, parcel (a) Transfer to the Secretary of the Navy Administrative jurisdiction over the parcel of Federal land consisting of approximately 1.23 acres located within Naval Support Activity Panama City, Florida, and used by the Department of the Navy pursuant to Executive Order 10355 of May 26, 1952, and Public Land Order Number 952 of April 6, 1954, is transferred from the Secretary of the Interior to the Secretary of the Navy. (b) Land survey The exact acreage and legal description of the Federal land transferred by subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Interior. (c) Consideration and reimbursement (1) No consideration The transfer made by subsection (a) shall be without consideration. (2) Reimbursement The Secretary of the Navy shall reimburse the Secretary of the Interior for any costs incurred by the Secretary of the Interior under subsection (b) in conducting the survey and preparing the legal description of the Federal land transferred by subsection (a). (d) Status of land after transfer Upon transfer of the Federal land by subsection (a), the land shall cease to be public land and shall be treated as property (as defined in section 102(9) of title 40, United States Code) under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy. E Military Land Withdrawals 2841. Renewal of land withdrawal and reservation to benefit Naval Air Facility, El Centro, California Section 2925 of the El Centro Naval Air Facility Ranges Withdrawal Act (subtitle B of title XXIX of Public Law 104–201 25 years after the date of the enactment of this subtitle on November 6, 2046 2842. Renewal of Fallon Range Training Complex land withdrawal and reservation Notwithstanding section 3015 of the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (title XXX of Public Law 106–65 2843. Renewal of Nevada Test and Training Range land withdrawal and reservation Notwithstanding section 3015 of the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (title XXX of Public Law 106–65 2844. Co-management, new memorandum of understanding, and additional requirements regarding Nevada Test and Training Range (a) Definitions In this section: (1) The term affected Indian tribe (A) has historical connections to the land withdrawn and reserved as the Nevada Test and Training Range; and (B) retains a presence on lands near the Nevada Test and Training Range. (2) The term heavy force (3) The term large force (4) The term Nevada Test and Training Range Public Law 106–65 (5) The term new memorandum of understanding (6) The term overlapping lands (7) The term Secretaries (8) The term small force (b) Co-Management of Federal lands overlapping Nevada Test and Training Range and Desert National Wildlife Refuge The Secretaries shall co-manage the overlapping lands for both military and wildlife refuge purposes. (c) Memorandum of understanding (1) New MOU required Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries shall prepare a memorandum of understanding regarding the management of the overlapping lands for the purpose of facilitating the co-management of the overlapping lands as required by subsection (b). (2) Relation to existing mou The new memorandum of understanding shall supersede the memorandum of understanding referred to in subparagraph (E) of section 3011(b)(5) of the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (title XXX of Public Law 106–65 (d) Elements of new memorandum of understanding (1) In general Subject to the dispute resolution process required by subsection (e), the new memorandum of understanding shall include, at a minimum, provisions to address the following: (A) The proper management and protection of the natural and cultural resources of the overlapping lands. (B) The sustainable use by the public of such resources to the extent consistent with existing laws and regulations, including applicable environmental laws. (C) The use of the overlapping lands for the military purposes for which the lands are withdrawn and reserved. (2) Consultation The Secretaries shall prepare the new memorandum of understanding in consultation with the following: (A) The resource consultative committee. (B) Affected Indian tribes. (3) Tribal issues The new memorandum of understanding shall include provisions to address the manner in which the Secretary of the Air Force will accomplish the following: (A) Meet the United States trust responsibilities with respect to affected Indian tribes, tribal lands, and rights reserved by treaty or Federal law affected by the withdrawal and reservation of the overlapping lands. (B) Guarantee reasonable access to, and use by members of affected Indian tribes of high priority cultural sites throughout the Nevada Test and Training Range, including the overlapping lands, consistent with the reservation of the lands for military purposes. (C) Protect identified cultural and archaeological sites throughout the Nevada Test and Training Range, including the overlapping lands, and, in the event of an inadvertent ground disturbance of such a site, implement appropriate response activities to once again facilitate historic and subsistence use of the site by members of affected Indian tribes. (D) Provide for timely consultation with affected Indian tribes as required by paragraph (2). (4) Department of the Interior access The new memorandum of understanding shall ensure that the Secretary of the Interior has regularly access to the overlapping lands to carry out the management responsibilities of the Secretary of the Interior regarding the Desert National Wildlife Refuge, including the following: (A) The installation or maintenance of wildlife water development projects. (B) The conduct of annual desert bighorn sheep surveys. (C) The management of the annual desert bighorn sheep hunt in accordance with the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 ( 16 U.S.C. 668dd–668ee (D) The conduct of annual biological surveys for the Agassiz’s desert tortoise and other federally protected species, State-listed and at-risk species, migratory birds, golden eagle nests and rare plants. (E) The conduct of annual invasive species surveys and treatment. (F) The conduct of annual contaminant surveys of soil, springs, groundwater and vegetation. (G) The regular installation and maintenance of climate monitoring systems. (H) Such additional access opportunities, as needed, for wildlife research, including Global Positioning System collaring of desert bighorn sheep, bighorn sheep disease monitoring, investigation of wildlife mortalities, and deploying, maintaining, and retrieving output from wildlife camera traps. (5) Hunting, fishing, and trapping The new memorandum of understanding shall include provisions to require that any hunting, fishing, and trapping on the overlapping lands is conducted in accordance with section 2671 of title 10, United States Code. (6) Other required matters The new memorandum of understanding also shall include provisions regarding the following: (A) The identification of current test and target impact areas and related buffer or safety zones, to the extent consistent with military purposes. (B) The design and construction of all gates, fences, and barriers in the overlapping lands, to be constructed after the date of the enactment of this Act, in a manner to allow wildlife access, to the extent practicable and consistent with military security, safety, and sound wildlife management use. (C) The incorporation of any existing management plans pertaining to the overlapping lands to the extent that the Secretaries, upon review of such plans, determine that incorporation into the new memorandum of understanding is appropriate. (D) Procedures to ensure periodic reviews of the new memorandum of understanding are conducted by the Secretaries, and that the State of Nevada, affected Indian tribes, and the public are provided a meaningful opportunity to comment upon any proposed substantial revisions. (e) Resolution of disputes (1) Dispute resolution process The Secretary of the Air Force shall be responsible for the resolution of any dispute concerning the new memorandum of understanding or any amendment thereto. (2) Consultation The Secretary of the Air Force shall make a decision under this subsection only after consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Regional Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, and the coordinator of the resource consultative committee. (3) Goal The Secretary of the Air Force shall seek to resolve disputes under this subsection in a manner that provides the greatest access to the overlapping lands to the public and to other Federal agencies and is protective of cultural and natural resources to the greatest extent possible consistent with the purposes for which the overlapping lands are reserved. (f) Resource Consultative Committee (1) Establishment required The Secretaries shall establish, pursuant to the new memorandum of understanding, a resource consultative committee comprised of representatives from interested Federal agencies, as well as at least one elected officer (or other authorized representative) from the State of Nevada, and at least one elected officer (or other authorized representative) from each local and tribal government impacted by the Nevada Test and Training Range, as may be designated at the discretion of the Secretaries. (2) Purpose The resource consultative committee shall be established solely for the purpose of exchanging views, information, and advice relating to the management of the natural and cultural resources of the Nevada Test and Training Range. (3) Operational basis The resource consultative committee shall operate in accordance with the terms set forth in the new memorandum of understanding, which shall specify the Federal agencies and elected officers or representatives of State, local, and tribal governments to be invited to participate. The memorandum of understanding shall establish procedures for creating a forum for exchanging views, information, and advice relating to the management of natural and cultural resources on the lands concerned, procedures for rotating the chair of the committee, and procedures for scheduling regular meetings. (4) Coordinator The Secretaries shall appoint an individual to serve as coordinator of the resource consultative committee. The duties of the coordinator shall be included in the new memorandum of understanding. The coordinator shall not be a member of the committee. (g) Authorized and Prohibited activities (1) Authorized activities Military activities on the overlapping lands are authorized for the following purposes: (A) Emergency response. (B) Establishment and use of existing or new electronic tracking and communications sites. (C) Establishment and use of drop zones. (D) Use and maintenance of roads in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act. (E) Small force readiness training by Air Force, Joint, or Coalition forces, including training using small motorized vehicles both on- and off-road, in accordance with applicable interagency agreements. (2) Prohibited activities Military activities on the overlapping lands are prohibited for the following purposes: (A) Large force or heavy force activities. (B) Designation of new weapon impact areas. (C) Any ground disturbance activity not authorized by paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (c). (3) Rules of construction Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to preclude— (A) low-level overflights of military aircraft, the designation of new units of special use airspace, or the use or establishment of military flight training routes over the overlapping lands; or (B) the Secretaries from entering into the new memorandum of understanding or any amendment thereto concerning the activities authorized by paragraph (1). (h) Tribal liaison positions (1) Access coordinator The Secretary of the Air Force shall create a tribal liaison position for the Nevada Test and Training Range, to be held by a member of an affected Indian tribe, who will help coordinate access to cultural and archaeological sites throughout the Nevada Test and Training Range and accompany members of Indian tribes accessing such sites. (2) Cultural resources liaison The Secretary of the Air Force shall create a tribal liaison position for the Nevada Test and Training Range, to be held by a member of an affected Indian tribe, who will serve as a tribal cultural resources liaison to ensure that— (A) appropriate steps are being taken to protect cultural and archaeological sites throughout the Nevada Test and Training Range; and (B) the management plan for the Nevada Test and Training Range is being followed. (i) Fish and wildlife liaison The Secretaries shall create a Fish and Wildlife Service liaison position for the Nevada Test and Training Range, to be held by a Fish and Wildlife Service official designated by the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, who will serve as a liaison to ensure that— (1) appropriate steps are being taken to protect Fish and Wildlife Service managed resources throughout the Nevada Test and Training Range; and (2) the management plan for the Nevada Test and Training Range is being followed. 2845. Specified duration of White Sands Missile Range land withdrawal and reservation and establishment of special reservation area for northern and western extension areas (a) Duration of land withdrawal and reservation The withdrawal and reservation of lands (known as the White Sands Missile Range) made by section 2951 of the Military Land Withdrawals Act of 2013 (title XXIX of Public Law 113–66 (b) Special reservation area (1) Establishment There is hereby established a special reservation area consisting of the approximately 341,415 acres of public land (including interests in land) in Socorro and Torrance Counties, New Mexico, and the approximately 352,115 acres of public land (including interests in land) in Sierra, Socorro, and Doña Ana Counties, New Mexico, depicted as Northern Call-Up Area and Western Call-Up Area, respectively, on the maps entitled WSMR Northern Call-Up Area WSMR Western Call-Up Area (2) Reservation generally The special reservation area, excluding the portion of the special reservation area under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Army, is reserved for use by the Secretary of the Army for military purposes consisting of overflight research, development, test, and evaluation and training. (3) Army lands The portion of the special reservation area under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Army is reserved for use by the Secretary of the Army for military purposes as determined by the Secretary of the Army. (c) Exception from special reservation The Secretary of the Army may permit, on a case-by-case basis and consistent with section 44718 of title 49, United States Code, the erection in the special reservation area established by subsection (b) of a structure that extends higher than 50 feet in height above the surface estate. (d) Maps and legal descriptions Section 3012 of the Military Land Withdrawals Act of 2013 (title XXIX of Public Law 113–66 (e) Rules of construction The establishment of the special reservation area by subsection (b) shall not be construed— (1) to alter the terms, operation, or duration of any agreement entered into by the Secretary of the Army or the Secretary of the Interior involving any portion of the lands included in the special reservation area, and the Secretaries shall continue to comply with the terms of any such agreement; or (2) to vest in the Secretary of the Army or the Secretary of the Interior any authority vested in the Secretary of Transportation or the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration. F Asia-Pacific and Indo-Pacific Issues 2851. Change to biennial reporting requirement for Interagency Coordination Group of Inspectors General for Guam Realignment Section 2835(e)(1) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84 10 U.S.C. 2687 (1) in the paragraph heading, by striking Annual Biennial (2) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)— (A) by striking February 1 of each year February 1, 2022, and every second February 1 thereafter (B) by striking fiscal year two fiscal years (C) by striking such year such years (D) by striking the year the years 2852. Additional exception to restriction on development of public infrastructure in connection with realignment of Marine Corps forces in Asia-Pacific region Notwithstanding section 2821(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291 10 U.S.C. 2687 Public Law 113–66 Economic Adjustment Committee Implementation Plan Supporting the Preferred Alternative for the Relocation of Marine Corps Forces to Guam 2853. Development of master plan for infrastructure to support rotational Armed Forces in Australia (a) Master plan required The Secretary of Defense shall develop a master plan for the construction of infrastructure required to support the rotational presence of units and members the United States Armed Forces in the Northern Territory of the Commonwealth of Australia (in this section referred to as the Northern Territory (b) Master plan elements The master plan shall include the following: (1) A list and description of the scope, cost, and schedule for each military construction, repair, or other infrastructure project carried out at installations or training areas in the Northern Territory since October 1, 2011. (2) A list and description of the scope, cost, and schedule for each military construction, repair, or other infrastructure project anticipated to be necessary at installations or training areas in the Northern Territory during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act. (3) The site plans for each installation and training area in the Northern Territory. (4) For each project included in the master plan pursuant to paragraph (1) or (2), an explanation of— (A) whether the proponent of the project was the Secretary of a military department, a combat support agency, a combatant command, or the Commonwealth of Australia; and (B) the funding source, or anticipated resource sponsor, for the project, including whether the project is funded by the United States, by the Commonwealth of Australia, or jointly by both countries. (5) Such other issues as determined by the Secretary of Defense to be appropriate. (c) Coordination The Secretary of Defense shall coordinate with the Commander of United States Indo-Pacific Command and the Secretaries of the military departments to develop the master plan. (d) Report requirement Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing a copy of the master plan. The report shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 2854. Study and strategy regarding bulk fuels management in United States Indo-Pacific Command Area of Responsibility (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) The ordering and delivery of bulk fuels is organizationally bifurcated to the detriment of the Department of Defense. (2) Legacy bulk fuel management will not meet the accelerated pace of operations required to support the National Defense Strategy and the emphasis on disaggregated operations. (3) The number of United States flagged tanking vessels continues to decline, which has resulted in an excessive reliance on foreign flagged tanking vessels to be available to support the National Defense Strategy. (4) A foreign flagged tanking vessel support strategy induces excessive risk to support United States disaggregated operations in a highly contested environment. (5) The inadequacies of the legacy bulk fuel management strategy is particularly acute in the United States Indo-Pacific Command Area of Responsibility. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that a single organizational element should be responsible for the bulk fuel management and delivery throughout the United States Indo-Pacific Command Area of Responsibility. (c) Study and strategy required The Secretary of the Navy shall— (1) conduct a study of current and projected bulk fuel management strategies in the United States Indo-Pacific Command Area of Responsibility; and (2) prepare a proposed bulk fuel management strategy that optimally supports bulk fuel management in the United States Indo-Pacific Command Area of Responsibility. (d) Elements of study The study required by subsection (c) shall include the following elements: (1) A description of current organizational responsibility of bulk fuel management in the United States Indo-Pacific Command Area of Responsibility from ordering, storage, strategic transportation, and tactical transportation to the last tactical mile. (2) A description of legacy bulk fuel management assets that can be used to support the United States Indo-Pacific Command. (3) Options for congressional consideration to better align organizational responsibility through the entirety of the bulk fuel management system in the United States Indo-Pacific Command Area of Responsibility, as proposed in the bulk fuel management strategy prepared pursuant to paragraph (2) of such subsection. (e) Coordination The Secretary of the Navy shall conduct the study and prepare the bulk fuel management strategy required by subsection (c) in coordination with subject-matter experts of the United States Indo-Pacific Command, the United States Transportation Command, and the Defense Logistics Agency. (f) Report required Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the results of the study required by subsection (c) and the bulk fuel management strategy required by such subsection. (g) Prohibition on certain construction pending report None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for the Navy for construction related to additional bulk fuel storage in the United States Indo-Pacific Command Area of Responsibility may be obligated or expended until the report required by subsection (f) is submitted to the congressional defense committees. G Other Matters 2861. Defense Community Infrastructure Program (a) Prioritization of community infrastructure projects Section 2391(d)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting (A) (1) (2) by striking , if the Secretary determines that such assistance will enhance the military value, resilience, or military family quality of life at such military installation (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (B) The Secretary shall establish criteria for the selection of community infrastructure projects to receive assistance under this subsection, including selection of community infrastructure projects in the following order of priority: (i) Projects that will enhance military installation resilience. (ii) Projects that will enhance military value at a military installation. (iii) Projects that will enhance military family quality of life at a military installation. . (b) Cost-sharing requirements Paragraph (2) of section 2391(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (2) (A) The criteria established for the selection of community infrastructure projects to receive assistance under this subsection shall include a requirement that, except as provided in subparagraph (B), the State or local government agree to contribute not less than 30 percent of the funding for the community infrastructure project. (B) If a proposed community infrastructure project will be carried out in a rural area or the Secretary of Defense determines that a proposed community infrastructure project is advantageous for reasons related to national security, the Secretary— (i) shall not penalize a State or local government for offering to make a contribution of 30 percent or less of the funding for the community infrastructure project; and (ii) may reduce the requirement for a State or local government contribution to 30 percent or less or waive the cost-sharing requirement entirely. . (c) Specified duration of program Section 2391(d)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking upon the expiration of the 10-year period which begins on the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 on September 30, 2028 2862. Pilot program on reduction of effects of military aviation noise on certain covered property (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a five-year pilot program under which the commander of a military installation may provide funds for the purpose of installing noise insulation on covered property impacted by military aviation noise from aircraft utilizing the installation. (b) Cost sharing requirement To be eligible to receive funds under the pilot program, a recipient shall enter into an agreement with the commander to cover at least 50 percent of the cost to acquire and install the noise insulation for the covered property. (c) Noise reduction threshold To be eligible to receive funds under the pilot program, the commander must determine that, if noise insulation is installed as requested, noise at the covered property would be reduced by at least five dB. (d) Other funding limitations Funds provided under the pilot program shall be used for the installation of noise insulation for covered property— (1) located within a Department of Defense noise contour between 65 dB day-night average sound level and 75 dB day-night average sound level as validated on a National Environmental Policy Act-compliant assessment within the past three years; and (2) where interior noise has been measured at 45 dB day-night average sound level by the installation. (e) Goals and best practices In carrying out the pilot program, a commander shall pursue the following goals and use the following best practices: (1) Minimize cost in order to maximize the quantity of covered property served. (2) Focus efforts on covered property newly impacted by increased noise levels. (f) Covered property defined For purposes of the pilot program, the term covered property (1) A private residence. (2) A hospital. (3) A daycare facility. (4) A school. (5) A facility whose primary purpose is serving senior citizens. (g) Condition on commencement Commencement of the pilot program shall be subject to the availability of appropriations for the program. 2863. Department of Defense policy for regulation of dangerous dogs in military communities (a) Policy Required Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, through the Veterinary Service Activity of the Department of Defense, shall establish a standardized policy applicable across all military communities for the regulation of dangerous dogs that is— (1) breed-neutral; and (2) consistent with advice from professional veterinary and animal behavior experts in regard to effective regulation of dangerous dogs. (b) Regulations (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall prescribe regulations implementing the policy established under subsection (a). (2) Best practices The regulations prescribed under paragraph (1) shall include strategies, for implementation within all military communities, for the prevention of dog bites that are consistent with the following best practices: (A) Enforcement of comprehensive, nonbreed-specific regulations relating to dangerous dogs, with emphasis on identification of dangerous dog behavior and chronically irresponsible owners. (B) Enforcement of animal control regulations, such as leash laws and stray animal control policies. (C) Promotion and communication of resources for pet spaying and neutering. (D) Investment in community education initiatives, such as teaching criteria for pet selection, pet care best practices, owner responsibilities, and safe and appropriate interaction with dogs. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) The term dangerous dog (A) has attacked a person or another animal without justification, causing injury or death to the person or animal; or (B) exhibits behavior that reasonably suggests the likely risk of such an attack. (2) The term military communities (A) all installations of the Department; and (B) all military housing, including privatized military housing under subchapter IV of chapter 169 XXIX Overseas Contingency Operations Military Construction 2901. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects The Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out the military construction projects for the installation outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table: Navy: Outside the United States Country Location Amount Spain Rota $59,230,000 2902. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects The Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out the military construction projects for the installations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Air Force: Outside the United States Country Location Amount Germany Ramstein $36,345,000 Spangdahlem Air Base $25,824,000 Romania Campia Turzii $130,500,000 2903. Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2020, for the military construction projects outside the United States authorized by this title as specified in the funding table in section 4602. C DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS XXXI DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS A National Security Programs and Authorizations 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2021 for the activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701. (b) Authorization of new plant projects From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new plant projects for the National Nuclear Security Administration as follows: Project 21–D–510, High Explosive Synthesis, Formulation, and Production facility, Pantex Plant, Amarillo, Texas, $177,395,000. Project 21–D–511, Savannah River Plutonium Processing Facility, Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina, $241,896,000. Project 21–D–512, Plutonium Pit Production Project, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, $116,900,000 for planning and design and $79,100,000 for construction. Project 21–D–530, Steam and Condensate Upgrade, Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, Schenectady, New York, $50,200,000. General Purpose Project, TA–15 Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test facility, Hydro Vessel Repair facility, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, $16,491,000. General Purpose Project, U1a.03 Test Bed Facility Improvements, Nevada National Security Site, Mercury, Nevada, $16,000,000. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2021 for defense environmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701. (b) Authorization of new plant projects From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out, for defense environmental cleanup activities, the following new plant projects: Project 21–D–401, Hoisting Capability Project, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Carlsbad, New Mexico, $10,000,000. 3103. Other defense activities Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2021 for other defense activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701. 3104. Nuclear energy Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2021 for nuclear energy as specified in the funding table in section 4701. B Program Authorizations, Restrictions, Limitations, and Other Matters 3111. Nuclear warhead acquisition processes (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) in its 25th year, the science-based Stockpile Stewardship Program established under section 4201 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2521 (2) maintaining global moratoria on nuclear explosive testing is in the national security interest of the United States; (3) a robust, second-to-none science and technology enterprise is required to maintain and certify the nuclear weapons stockpile of the United States; and (4) the National Nuclear Security Administration must continue to improve program management and execution of the major acquisition programs of the Administration. (b) Requirements (1) Phases Subtitle A of title XLII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 4201 4223. Requirements for certain joint nuclear weapons life cycle phases (a) Design and engineering requirements The Administrator shall ensure the following: (1) The national security laboratories engage in peer review of proposed designs of nuclear weapons. (2) The nuclear weapons production facilities are involved early and often during the design and engineering process of nuclear weapons in order to take into account how such design and engineering will affect the production of the nuclear weapons. (b) Requirements after phase 1 After the Administrator completes phase 1 of the joint nuclear weapons life cycle for a nuclear weapon, the Nuclear Weapons Council shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the following: (1) A description of the potential military characteristics of the nuclear weapon. (2) A description of the stockpile-to-target sequence requirements of the nuclear weapon. (3) A description of any other requirements of the Administration or the Department of Energy that will affect the nuclear weapon, including the first product unit date, the initial operational capability date, the final operational capability date, or requirements relating to increased safety and surety. (4) Initial assessments of the effect to the nuclear security enterprise workforce and any required new or recapitalized major facilities or capabilities relating to the nuclear weapon. (c) Requirements entering into phase 2 Not later than 15 days after the date on which the Nuclear Weapons Council approves a nuclear weapon for phase 2 of the joint nuclear weapons life cycle, the Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan to implement an independent peer-review process, a board of experts, or both, with respect to the nonnuclear weapon component and subsystem design and engineering aspects of such nuclear weapon. The Administrator shall ensure that such process— (1) uses all relevant capabilities of the Federal Government, the defense industrial base, and academia, and other capabilities that the Administrator determines necessary; and (2) informs the entire development life cycle of such nuclear weapon. (d) Requirements entering into phase 3 (1) Independent cost assessment Before the Nuclear Weapons Council approves a nuclear weapon for phase 3 of the joint nuclear weapons life cycle, the Administrator shall ensure that an independent cost assessment is conducted for phase 3 that includes assigning a percentage of confidence level with respect to the Administrator being able to carry out phase 3 within the estimated schedule and cost objectives. (2) Certifications and reports Not later than 15 days after the date on which the Nuclear Weapons Council approves a nuclear weapon for phase 3 of the joint nuclear weapons life cycle— (A) the Administrator shall certify to the congressional defense committees that— (i) the joint nuclear weapons life cycle process for phases 1 through 5 of the nuclear weapon has equal or greater rigor as the life extension process under each part of phase 6; and (ii) the level of design and technology maturity of the proposed design of the nuclear weapon can be carried out within the estimated schedule and cost objectives specified in the cost assessment under paragraph (1); and (B) the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing— (i) the specific warhead requirements for the delivery system of the nuclear weapon, including such planned requirements during the 15-year period following the date of the report; and (ii) an identification of the tail numbers of the warheads for that delivery system that may require life extensions, be retired, or be altered during such period, and a description of the considerations for deciding on such actions. (e) Waivers Subsections (b) through (d) may be waived during a period of war declared by Congress after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021. (f) Joint nuclear weapons life cycle defined In this section, the term joint nuclear weapons life cycle . (2) Clerical amendment The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4222 the following new item: Sec. 4223. Requirements for certain joint nuclear weapons life cycle phases. . (c) Selected acquisition reports and independent cost estimates Section 4217(b)(1) of such Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2537(b)(1) (1) in subparagraph (A)— (A) in clause (i), by striking phase 6.2A phase 2A and phase 6.2A (B) in clause (ii), by striking phase 6.3 phase 3 and phase 6.3 (C) in clause (iii)— (i) by striking phase 6.4 phase 4 and phase 6.4 (ii) by striking phase 6.5 phase 5 and phase 6.5 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking phase 6.2 phase 2 and phase 6.2 (d) Report Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director for Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation of the National Nuclear Security Administration shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing recommendations to strengthen governance, program execution, and program management controls with respect to the process of the joint nuclear weapons life cycle (as defined in section 4220 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2538b 3112. Uncosted and unobligated amounts of National Nuclear Security Administration Section 3251(b) of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2451(b) (3) In the budget justification materials for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2026 submitted to Congress in support of each such budget, the Administrator shall include a detailed description of the uncosted and unobligated amounts that the Administrator maintains, listed by the year for which the amounts were appropriated, including— (A) the gross uncosted and unobligated amounts for each individual program element (using thresholds specified in the report submitted by the Secretary of Energy to Congress titled Report on Uncosted Balances for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2014 (B) an explanation for why the uncosted and unobligated amounts have not been expended. . 3113. Extension of limitation relating to reclassification of high-level waste Section 3121 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 fiscal year 2020 fiscal year 2020 or fiscal year 2021 3114. Extension of pilot program on unavailability for overhead costs of amounts specified for laboratory-directed research and development Section 3119 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 50 U.S.C. 2791 (1) in subsection (c)(2), by striking four five (2) in subsection (d), by striking February 15, 2020 December 31, 2020 3115. Plutonium pit production (a) Independent cost estimate (1) Requirement The Secretary of Energy shall conduct an independent cost estimate of the Savannah River Plutonium Processing Facility project in accordance with Department of Energy Directive 413.3b, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. (2) Confidence level The assessment under paragraph (1) shall assign a percentage of confidence level with respect to the Secretary being able to carry out the Facility project within the estimated schedule and cost objectives. (3) Submission The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the independent cost estimate under paragraph (1). (b) Conditional reports and certifications (1) Low confidence If the assessment under subsection (a) assigns a confidence level below 90 percent pursuant to paragraph (2) of such subsection— (A) the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the report described in paragraph (2); and (B) the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall certify to such committees that either— (i) the requirement to produce not less than 80 war reserve plutonium pits during 2030 pursuant to section 4219 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2538a (ii) such requirement can be so extended without causing a grave threat to the national security of the United States. (2) Report The report described in this paragraph is a report by the Secretary that contains either of the following: (A) A certification by the Secretary, without delegation, that, notwithstanding the confidence level contained in the assessment under subsection (a), the Secretary has a confidence level of 90 percent or greater with respect to being able to carry out the Facility project within the estimated schedule and cost objectives. (B) If the Secretary cannot make the certification under subparagraph (A), a plan by the Secretary to achieve such a confidence level of 90 percent or greater, including with respect to changing the costs, schedule, and scope of the Facility project. 3116. Program for research and development of advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium (a) Establishment Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall establish a program to assess the viability of using low-enriched uranium in naval nuclear propulsion reactors, including such reactors located on aircraft carriers and submarines, that meet the requirements of the Navy. (b) Activities In carrying out the program under subsection (a), the Administrator shall carry out activities to develop an advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium, including activities relating to— (1) down-blending of high-enriched uranium into low-enriched uranium; (2) manufacturing of candidate advanced low-enriched uranium fuels; (3) irradiation tests and post-irradiation examination of these fuels; and (4) modification or procurement of equipment and infrastructure relating to such activities. (c) Report Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan outlining the activities the Administrator will carry out under the program established under subsection (a), including the funding requirements associated with developing a low-enriched uranium fuel. 3117. Independent study on effects of use of nuclear weapons (a) Study The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall seek to enter into an agreement with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine under which the National Academies conduct a study on the atmospheric effects of nuclear explosions. (b) Matters included The study under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An evaluation of the non-fallout atmospheric effects of likely and plausible scenarios for nuclear war, ranging from relatively small, regional exchanges to large exchanges associated with nuclear war between major powers. (2) An examination of the effects evaluated under paragraph (1) by— (A) the yield, type, and number of nuclear weapons; (B) the types and locations of targets; (C) the time distribution of the explosions; (D) the atmospheric conditions; and (E) other factors that may have a significant impact on the effects. (3) An assessment of current models of nuclear explosions, including with respect to— (A) the fires such explosions may cause; (B) the atmospheric transport of the gases from such explosions; (C) the radioactive material from such explosions; and (D) the soot and other debris from such explosions and fires, the atmospheric effects of such soot and debris, and the consequences of such effects, including the consequences relating to extreme weather, air pollution, stratospheric ozone, agriculture, and marine and terrestrial ecosystems. (4) Identification of the capabilities and limitations of the models described in paragraph (3) for assessing the impacts of nuclear war, including— (A) an evaluation of the relevant uncertainties; (B) a highlight of the key data gaps; and (C) recommendations for how such models can be improved to inform decision making. (c) Report (1) In general Not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the National Academies shall submit to the Administrator for National Security and the congressional defense committees a report on the study under subsection (a). (2) Form The report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (d) Information The Secretary of Defense shall provide to the National Academies the information of the Department of Defense necessary for the National Academies to conduct the study under subsection (a), including information relating to relevant scenarios described in subsection (b). 3118. Reports on diversity of certain contractor employees of National Nuclear Security Administration (a) Annual reports Not later than December 31, 2020, and each year thereafter through 2022, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the diversity of contractor employees of the National Nuclear Security Administration. (b) Matters included Subject to subsection (c), each report under subsection (a) shall include, for each covered element of the Administration, the following: (1) With respect to the fiscal year covered by the report and the previous fiscal year, demographic data of— (A) the contractor employees of the covered element; (B) the contractor employees hired at the covered element during each such year; and (C) the contractor employees of the covered element who voluntarily separated during each such year. (2) A breakdown of the data under paragraph (1) by each position in the common occupational classification system. (3) A description of the plan to increase diversity at the covered element, and how such plan responds to any trends identified with respect to the data under paragraph (1). (4) An identification of the official of the covered element responsible for implementing such plan and a description of how the person determines whether the covered element is meeting the goals of the plan. (5) A description of the training resources relating to diversity, equality, and inclusion are available to contractor employees of the covered element with hiring authority, and an identification of how many such contractor employees have been trained. (c) Data The Administrator shall carry out this section using data that is— (1) otherwise available to the Administrator and to the management and operating contractors of the nuclear security enterprise; and (2) collected in accordance with applicable regulations of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, regulations of the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs of the Department of Labor, and applicable provisions of Federal law on privacy. (d) Publication The Administrator shall make publicly available on the internet website of the Department of Energy each report under subsection (a), subject to the regulations and Federal law specified in subsection (c)(2). (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term contractor employee (2) The term covered element 50 U.S.C. 2471 (3) The term nuclear security enterprise 50 U.S.C. 2471 3119. Findings, purpose, and apology relating to fallout emitted during the Government's atmospheric nuclear tests Section 2(a)(1) of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act ( Public Law 101–426 42 U.S.C. 2210 , including individuals in New Mexico, Idaho, Colorado, Arizona, Utah, Texas, Wyoming, Oregon, Washington, South Dakota, North Dakota, Nevada, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands, tests exposed individuals 3120. Sense of Congress regarding uranium mining and nuclear testing It is the sense of Congress that the United States should compensate and recognize all of the miners, workers, downwinders, and others suffering from the effects of uranium mining and nuclear testing carried out during the Cold War. XXXII Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 3201. Authorization There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021, $28,836,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 ( 42 U.S.C. 2286 XXXIV Naval Petroleum Reserves 3401. Authorization of appropriations (a) Amount There are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Energy $13,006,000 for fiscal year 2021 for the purpose of carrying out activities under chapter 869 (b) Period of availability Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) shall remain available until expended. XXXV Maritime Matters A Maritime Administration 3501. Authorization of the Maritime Administration (a) Fiscal year 2021 authorization There are authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Transportation for fiscal year 2021, to be available without fiscal year limitation if so provided in appropriations Acts, for programs associated with maintaining the United States merchant marine, the following amounts: (1) For expenses necessary for operations of the United States Merchant Marine Academy, $81,944,000, of which— (A) $76,444,000 shall be for Academy operations; and (B) $5,500,000 shall remain available until expended for capital asset management at the Academy. (2) For expenses necessary to support the State maritime academies, $37,700,000, of which— (A) $2,400,000 shall remain available until September 30, 2021, for the Student Incentive Program; and (B) $30,500,000 shall remain available until expended for maintenance and repair of State maritime academy training vessels. (3) For expenses necessary to support the National Security Multi-Mission Vessel Program, $388,815,000, which shall remain available until expended. (4) For expenses necessary to support Maritime Administration operations and programs, $55,853,000. (5) For expenses necessary to dispose of vessels in the National Defense Reserve Fleet, $4,200,000, which shall remain available until expended. (6) For expenses necessary to maintain and preserve a United States flag merchant marine to serve the national security needs of the United States under chapter 531 (7) For expenses necessary for the loan guarantee program authorized under chapter 537 (A) $30,000,000 may be used for the cost (as defined in section 502(5) of the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 ( 2 U.S.C. 661a(5) (B) $3,000,000 may be used for administrative expenses relating to loan guarantee commitments under the program. (8) For expenses necessary to provide small shipyards and maritime communities grants under section 54101 of title 46, United States Code, $20,000,000. (b) Amount of fiscal year 2021 contractor payments under operating agreements Section 53106(a)(1)(B) of title 46, United States Code, is amended by striking $5,233,463 $8,233,463 (c) Conforming amendment Section 53111(2) of title 46, United States Code, is amended by striking $314,007,780 $494,008,000 3502. Sense of Congress regarding role of domestic maritime industry in national security (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) The United States domestic maritime industry, with a fleet of nearly 40,000 vessels, supports nearly 650,000 American jobs and provides more than $150,000,000 in annual economic output. (2) The vessel innovations of the domestic trades that transformed worldwide maritime commerce include the development of container ships, self-unloading vessels, articulated tug-barges, trailer barges, chemical parcel tankers, railroad-on-barge carfloats, and river flotilla towing systems. (3) The domestic fleet is essential to national security is needed to crew United States Government-owned and other sealift vessels to protect the Nation. (4) The Department of Defense and the entire national security infrastructure of the United States benefits from a robust commercial shipyard and ship repair industry, which helps provide both economic and military sealift support. (5) The Department of Defense depends on the United States domestic trades’ fleet of container ships, roll-on/roll-off ships, product tankers, and other vessels to assist with the flow of military cargoes during both peace time and war time. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) United States coastwise trade laws promote a strong domestic trade maritime industry, which supports the national security and economic vitality of the United States and the efficient operation of the United States transportation system; and (2) a strong commercial maritime industry makes the United States more secure. 3503. Nonapplicability of requirement relating to minimum number of operating days for vessels operating under MSP Operating Agreements Notwithstanding part 296 of title 46, Code of Federal Regulations, until December 31, 2020, or upon the written determination of the Secretary of Transportation until June 31, 2021, the operator of a vessel operating such vessel under an MSP Operating Agreement (as such term is defined in section 296.2 of title 46, Code of Federal Regulations)— (1) shall not be required to comply with any requirement with respect to operating days (as such term is defined in such section) contained in such agreement; and (2) shall maintain such vessel in a state of operational readiness, including through the employment of the vessel’s crew complement, until the applicable date. 3504. Improvements to process for waiving navigation and vessel-inspection laws (a) Improvements to waiver process Section 501 of title 46, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by adding to address an immediate adverse effect on military operations national defense (2) in subsection (b)— (A) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; (B) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph: (2) Duration of waiver (A) In general Subject to subparagraphs (B) and (C), a waiver issued under this subsection shall be for a period of not more than 10 days. (B) Waiver extension Upon the termination of the period of a waiver issued under this subsection, the head of an agency may extend the waiver for an additional period of not more than 10 days, if the Maritime Administrator makes the determinations referred to in paragraph (1). (C) Aggregate duration The aggregate duration of the period of all waivers and extensions of waivers under this subsection with respect to any one set of events shall not exceed 45 days. ; and (C) in paragraph (4), as so redesignated— (i) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking paragraph (2)(A) paragraph (3)(A) (ii) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (C) Notification required for extensions For purposes of this paragraph, an extension requested or issued under paragraph (2)(B) shall be treated in the same manner as a waiver requested or issued under this section. ; (3) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and (4) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection: (c) Report (1) In general Not later than 10 days after the date of the conclusion of the voyage of a vessel that, during such voyage, operated under a waiver issued under this section, the owner or operator of the vessel shall submit to the Maritime Administrator a report that includes— (A) the name and flag of the vessel; (B) the dates of the voyage; (C) any relevant ports of call; and (D) any other information the Maritime Administrator determines necessary. (2) Publication Not later than 48 hours after receiving a report under paragraph (1), the Maritime Administrator shall publish such report on an appropriate website of the Department of Transportation. . (b) Applicability The amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to waivers issued after the date of the enactment of this Act. B Tanker Security Fleet 3511. Tanker Security Fleet (a) In general Part C of subtitle V of title 46, United States Code, is amended by inserting after chapter 531 the following new chapter: 532 Tanker Security Fleet 53201. Definitions. 53202. Establishment of the Tanker Security Fleet. 53203. Vessel standards. 53204. Award of operating agreements. 53205. Effectiveness of operating agreements. 53206. Obligations and rights under operating agreements. 53207. Payments. 53208. National security requirements. 53209. Regulatory relief. 53210. Special rule regarding age of participating Fleet vessels. 53211. Regulations. 53212. Authorization of appropriations. 53213. Acquisition of Fleet vessels. 53201. Definitions In this chapter: (1) Foreign commerce The term foreign commerce (A) commerce or trade between the United States, its territories or possessions, or the District of Columbia, and a foreign country; and (B) commerce or trade between foreign countries including trade between foreign ports in accordance with normal commercial bulk shipping practices in such a manner as will permit vessels of the United States freely to compete with foreign-flag liquid bulk carrying vessels in their operation or in competing charters, subject to rules and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to this chapter or subtitle. (2) Participating Fleet vessel The term participating Fleet vessel (3) Person The term person (4) Tank vessel The term tank vessel (5) United states citizen trust The term United States citizen trust (A) means a trust for which— (i) each of the trustees is a citizen of the United States; and (ii) the application for documentation of the vessel under chapter 121 includes an affidavit of each trustee stating that the trustee is not aware of any reason involving a beneficiary of the trust that is not a citizen of the United States, or involving any other person who is not a citizen of the United States, as a result of which the beneficiary or other person would hold more than 25 percent of the aggregate power to influence or limit the exercise of the authority of the trustee with respect to matters involving any ownership or operation of the vessel that may adversely affect the interests of the United States; (B) does not include a trust for which any person that is not a citizen of the United States has authority to direct, or participate in directing, a trustee for a trust in matters involving any ownership or operation of the vessel that may adversely affect the interests of the United States or in removing a trustee without cause, either directly or indirectly through the control of another person, unless the trust instrument provides that persons who are not citizens of the United States may not hold more than 25 percent of the aggregate authority to so direct or remove a trustee; and (C) may include a trust for which a person who is not a citizen of the United States holds more than 25 percent of the beneficial interest in the trust. 53202. Establishment of the Tanker Security Fleet (a) In general The Secretary of Transportation, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall establish a fleet of active, commercially viable, militarily useful, privately owned product tankers to meet national defense and other security requirements and maintain a United States presence in international commercial shipping. The fleet shall consist of privately owned vessels of the United States for which there are in effect operating agreements under this chapter, and shall be known as the Tanker Security Fleet Fleet (b) Vessel Eligibility A vessel is eligible to be included in the Fleet if the vessel— (1) meets the requirements under paragraph (1), (2), (3), or (4) of subsection (c); (2) is operated (or in the case of a vessel to be constructed, will be operated) in providing transportation in United States foreign commerce; (3) is self-propelled; (4) is not more than ten years of age on the date the vessel is first included in the Fleet and not more than 25 years of age at any time during which the vessel is included in the Fleet; (5) is determined by the Secretary of Defense to be suitable for use by the United States for national defense or military purposes in time of war or national emergency; and (6) is commercially viable, as determined by the Secretary of Transportation; and (7) is— (A) a vessel of the United States; or (B) not a vessel of the United States, but— (i) the owner of the vessel has demonstrated an intent to have the vessel documented under chapter 121 if it is included in the Fleet; and (ii) at the time an operating agreement is entered into under this chapter, the vessel is eligible for documentation under chapter 121. (c) Requirements regarding citizenship of owners, charterers, and operators (1) Vessels owned and operated by section 50501 citizens A vessel meets the requirements of this paragraph if, during the period of an operating agreement under this chapter that applies to the vessel, the vessel will be owned and operated by one or more persons that are citizens of the United States under section 50501. (2) Vessels owned by a section 50501 citizen, or United States citizen trust, and chartered to a documentation citizen A vessel meets the requirements of this paragraph if— (A) during the period of an operating agreement under this chapter that applies to the vessel, the vessel will be— (i) owned by a person that is a citizen of the United States under section 50501 or that is a United States citizen trust; and (ii) demise chartered to a person— (I) that is eligible to document the vessel under chapter 121; (II) the chairman of the board of directors, chief executive officer, and a majority of the members of the board of directors of which are citizens of the United States under section 50501, and are appointed and subjected to removal only upon approval by the Secretary; and (III) that certifies to the Secretary that there are no treaties, statutes, regulations, or other laws that would prohibit the owner or operator for the vessel from performing its obligations under an operating agreement under this chapter; (B) in the case of a vessel that will be demise chartered to a person that is owned or controlled by another person that is not a citizen of the United States under section 50501, the other person enters into an agreement with the Secretary not to influence the operation of the vessel in a manner that will adversely affect the interests of the United States; and (C) the Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of Defense notify the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives that the Secretaries concur with the certification required under subparagraph (A)(ii)(III), and have reviewed and agree that there are no legal, operational, or other impediments that would prohibit the owner or operator for the vessel from performing its obligations under an operating agreement under this chapter. (3) Vessels owned and operated by a defense owner or operator A vessel meets the requirements of this paragraph if— (A) during the period of an operating agreement under this chapter that applies to the vessel, the vessel will be owned and operated by a person that— (i) is eligible to document a vessel under chapter 121; (ii) operates or manages other vessels of the United States for the Secretary of Defense, or charters other vessels to the Secretary of Defense; (iii) has entered into a special security agreement for the purpose of this paragraph with the Secretary of Defense; (iv) makes the certification described in paragraph (2)(A)(ii)(III); and (v) in the case of a vessel described in paragraph (2)(B), enters into an agreement referred to in that subparagraph; and (B) the Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of Defense notify the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives that they concur with the certification required under subparagraph (A)(iv), and have reviewed and agree that there are no legal, operational, or other impediments that would prohibit the owner or operator for the vessel from performing its obligations under an operating agreement under this chapter. (4) Vessels owned by documentation citizens and chartered to section 50501 citizens A vessel meets the requirements of this paragraph if, during the period of an operating agreement under this chapter, the vessel will be— (A) owned by a person who is eligible to document a vessel under chapter 121; and (B) demise chartered to a person that is a citizen of the United States under section 50501. (d) Request by secretary of defense The Secretary of Defense shall request that the Commandant of the Coast Guard issue any waiver under section 501 that the Secretary of Defense determines is necessary for purposes of this chapter. (e) Vessel standards (1) Certificate of Inspection A vessel used to provide oceangoing transportation that the Commandant of the Coast Guard determines meets the criteria of subsection (b) but which, on the date of enactment of this section, is not documented under chapter 121, shall be eligible for a certificate of inspection if the Commandant of the Coast Guard determines that— (A) the vessel is classed by and designed in accordance with the rules of the American Bureau of Shipping, or another classification society accepted by the Commandant of the Coast Guard; (B) the vessel complies with applicable international agreements and associated guidelines, as determined by the country in which the vessel was documented immediately before becoming documented under chapter 121; and (C) the country has not been identified by the Commandant of the Coast Guard as inadequately enforcing international vessel regulations as to that vessel. (2) Reliance on classification society (A) In general The Commandant of the Coast Guard may rely on a certification from the American Bureau of Shipping or, subject to subparagraph (B), another classification society accepted by the Commandant of the Coast Guard, to establish that a vessel is in compliance with the requirements of paragraph (1). (B) Foreign classification society The Secretary may accept certification from a foreign classification society under subparagraph (A) only— (i) to the extent that the government of the foreign country in which the society is headquartered provides access on a reciprocal basis to the American Bureau of Shipping; and (ii) if the foreign classification society has offices and maintains records in the United States. 53203. Vessel standards (a) Certificate of inspection A vessel used to provide transportation service as a common carrier that the Secretary of Transportation determines meets the criteria of section 53102(b), which on the date of enactment of this section is not a documented vessel, shall be eligible for a certificate of inspection if the Secretary determines that— (1) the vessel is classed by and designed in accordance with the rules of the American Bureau of Shipping or another classification society accepted by the Secretary; (2) the vessel complies with applicable international agreements and associated guidelines, as determined by the country in which the vessel was documented immediately before becoming a documented vessel (as defined in that section); and (3) that country has not been identified by the Secretary as inadequately enforcing international vessel regulations as to that vessel. (b) Continued Eligibility for Certificate Subsection (a) does not apply to any vessel that has failed to comply with the applicable international agreements and association guidelines referred to in subsection (a)(2). (c) Reliance on Classification Society (1) In general The Secretary may rely on a certification from the American Bureau of Shipping or, subject to paragraph (2), another classification society accepted by the Secretary, to establish that a vessel is in compliance with the requirements of subsections (a) and (b). (2) Foreign classification society The Secretary may accept certification from a foreign classification society under paragraph (1) only— (A) to the extent that the government of the foreign country in which the society is headquartered provides access on a reciprocal basis to the American Bureau of Shipping; and (B) if the foreign classification society has offices and maintains records in the United States. 53204. Award of operating agreements (a) In general The Secretary of Transportation shall require, as a condition of including any vessel in the Fleet, that the owner or operator of the vessel enter into an operating agreement with the Secretary under this section. (b) Procedure for applications (1) Participating Fleet vessels (A) In General The Secretary of Transportation shall accept an application for an operating agreement for a participating Fleet vessel under the priority under paragraph (2) only from a person that has authority to enter into an operating agreement under this chapter. (B) Vessel under demise charter For purposes of subparagraph (A), in the case of a vessel that is subject to a demise charter that terminates by its own terms on September 30, 2035 (without giving effect to any extension provided therein for completion of a voyage or to effect the actual redelivery of the vessel), or that is terminable at the will of the owner of the vessel after such date, only the owner of the vessel shall be treated as having the authority referred to in subparagraph (A). (C) Vessel owned by a united states citizen trust For purposes of subparagraph (B), in the case of a vessel owned by a United States citizen trust, the term owner of the vessel (2) Discretion within priority The Secretary of Transportation— (A) may award operating agreements under paragraph (1) according to such priorities as the Secretary considers appropriate; and (B) shall award operating agreements within any such priority— (i) in accordance with operational requirements specified by the Secretary of Defense; (ii) in the case of operating agreements awarded under subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), according to applicants’ records of owning and operating vessels; and (iii) subject to approval of the Secretary of Defense. (c) Limitation For any fiscal year, the Secretary may not award operating agreements under this chapter that require payments under section 53207 for more than 10 vessels. 53205. Effectiveness of operating agreements (a) In general Subject to the availability of appropriations for such purpose, the Secretary of Transportation may enter into an operating agreement under this chapter for fiscal year 2021 and any subsequent fiscal year. Each such agreement may be renewed annually for up to seven years. (b) Vessels under charter to the United States The owner or operator of a vessel under charter to the United States is eligible to receive payments pursuant to any operating agreement that covers such vessel. (c) Termination (1) Termination by Secretary for lack of owner or operator compliance If the owner or operator with respect to an operating agreement materially fails to comply with the terms of the agreement— (A) the Secretary shall notify the owner or operator and provide a reasonable opportunity to comply with the operating agreement; and (B) the Secretary shall terminate the operating agreement if the owner or operator fails to achieve such compliance. (2) Termination by owner or operator (A) In general If an owner or operator provides notice of the intent to terminate an operating agreement under this chapter by not later than 60 days prior to the date specified by the owner or operator for such termination, such agreement shall terminate on the date specified by the owner or operator. (B) Replacement An operating agreement with respect to a vessel shall terminate on the date that is three years after the date on which the vessel begins operating under the agreement, if— (i) the owner or operator notifies the Secretary, by not later than two years after the date the vessel begins operating under the agreement, that the owner or operator intends to terminate the agreement under this subparagraph; and (ii) the Secretary of Transportation, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, determines that— (I) an application for an operating agreement under this chapter has been received for a replacement vessel that is acceptable to the Secretaries; and (II) during the period of an operating agreement under this chapter that applies to the replacement vessel, the replacement vessel will be— (aa) owned and operated by one or more persons that are citizens of the United States under section 50501; or (bb) owned by a person who is eligible to document the vessel under chapter 121, and operated by a person that is a citizen of the United States under section 50501. (d) Nonrenewal for lack of funds (1) In general If sufficient funds are not made available to carry out an operating agreement under this chapter— (A) the Secretary of Transportation shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives notice that such agreement shall be not renewed effective on the 60th day of the fiscal year, unless such funds are made available before such day; and (B) effective on the 60th day of such fiscal year, terminate such agreement and provide notice of such termination to the owner or operator of the vessel covered by the agreement. (2) Release of vessels from obligations If an operating agreement for a vessel under this chapter is not renewed pursuant to paragraph (1), then the owner or operator of the vessel is released from any further obligation under the operating agreement as of the date of such termination or nonrenewal. (3) Foreign transfer and registration The owner or operator of a vessel covered by an operating agreement under this chapter may transfer and register such vessel under a foreign registry that is acceptable to the Secretary and the Secretary of Defense, notwithstanding section 53201. (4) Requisition If chapter 563 is applicable to a vessel after registration, then the vessel is available to be requisitioned by the Secretary pursuant to chapter 563. 53206. Obligations and rights under operating agreements (a) Operation of Vessel An operating agreement under this chapter shall require that, during the period the vessel covered by the agreement is operating under the agreement the vessel shall— (1) be operated in the United States foreign commerce, mixed United States foreign commerce and domestic trade allowed under a registry endorsement issued under section 12111, in foreign-to-foreign commerce, or under a charter to the United States; (2) not be operated in the coastwise trade except as described in paragraph (1); and (3) be documented under chapter 121. (b) Operating agreement is an obligation of the United States Government An operating agreement under this chapter constitutes a contractual obligation of the United States Government to pay the amounts provided for in the agreement to the extent of actual appropriations. (c) Obligations of owner or operator (1) In general The owner or operator of a vessel covered by an operating agreement under this chapter shall agree, as a condition of such agreement, to remain obligated to carry out the requirements described in paragraph (2) until the termination date specified in the agreement, even in the case of early termination of the agreement under section 53205(c). This subsection shall not apply in the case of an operating agreement terminated for lack of funds under section 53205(d). (2) Requirements The requirements described in this paragraph are the following: (A) To continue the documentation of the vessel under chapter 121. (B) To be bound by the requirements of section 53208. (C) That all terms and conditions of an emergency preparedness agreement entered into under section 53208 shall remain in effect, except that the terms of such emergency preparedness agreement may be modified by the mutual consent of the owner or operator, the Secretary and the Secretary of Defense as provided in such section. (d) Transfer of operating agreements The owner or operator of a vessel covered by an operating agreement under this chapter may transfer that agreement (including all rights and obligations under the agreement) to any person that is eligible to enter into that operating agreement under this chapter, if the transfer is approved by the Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of Defense. (e) Replacement of vessels covered by agreements An owner or operator of a vessel covered by an operating agreement under this chapter may replace the vessel with another vessel that is eligible to be included in the Fleet under section 53202(b), if the Secretary of Transportation, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, approves the replacement of the vessel. In selecting a replacement vessel, the owner or operator shall give primary consideration to— (1) the commercial viability of the vessel; (2) the utility of the vessel with respect to the operating requirements of the owner or operator; and (3) ensuring that the commercial and military utility of any replacement vessel is not less than that of the initial vessel. 53207. Payments (a) Annual payment Subject to the availability of appropriations for such purpose and the other provisions of this chapter, the Secretary shall pay to the owner or operator of a vessel covered by an operating agreement under this chapter an amount equal to $6,000,000 for each vessel covered by the agreement for each fiscal year that the vessel is covered by the agreement. Such amount shall be paid in equal monthly installments on the last day of each month. The amount payable under this subsection may not be reduced except as provided by this section. (b) Certification required for payment As a condition of receiving payment under this section for a fiscal year for a vessel, the owner or operator of the vessel shall certify, in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary, that the vessel has been and will be operated in accordance with section 53206 for at least 320 days during the fiscal year. Days during which the vessel is drydocked, surveyed, inspected, or repaired shall be considered days of operation for purposes of this subsection. (c) General limitations The Secretary may not make any payment under this chapter for a vessel with respect to any days for which the vessel is— (1) not operated or maintained in accordance with an operating agreement under this chapter; or (2) more than 25 years of age. (d) Reductions in payments With respect to payments under this chapter for a vessel covered by an operating agreement, the Secretary— (1) except as provided in paragraph (2), may not reduce such a payment for the operation of the vessel to carry military or other preference cargoes under section 55302(a), 55304, 55305, or 55314, section 2631 of title 10, or any other cargo preference law of the United States; (2) may not make such a payment for any day that the vessel is engaged in transporting more than 7,500 tons of civilian bulk preference cargoes pursuant to section 55302(a), 55305, or 55314, that is bulk cargo; and (3) shall make a pro rata reduction for each day less than 320 in a fiscal year that the vessel is not operated in accordance with section 53206. (e) Limitations regarding noncontiguous domestic trade (1) In general No owner or operator shall receive payments pursuant to this chapter during a period in which it participates in noncontiguous domestic trade. (2) Limitation on application Paragraph (1) shall not apply to a owner or operator that is a citizen of the United States within the meaning of section 50501, applying the 75 percent ownership requirement of that section. (3) Participates in a noncontiguous trade defined In this subsection the term participates in a noncontiguous domestic trade 53208. National security requirements (a) Emergency preparedness agreement required The Secretary of Transportation, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, shall establish an emergency preparedness program under this section under which the owner or operator of a vessel covered by an operating agreement under this chapter shall agree, as a condition of the operating agreement, to enter into an emergency preparedness agreement with the Secretaries. Each such emergency preparedness agreement shall be entered into as promptly as practicable after the owner or operator has entered into the operating agreement. (b) Terms of agreement The terms of an agreement under this section— (1) shall provide that upon request by the Secretary of Defense during time of war or national emergency, or whenever determined by the Secretary of Defense to be necessary for national security or contingency operation (as that term is defined in section 101 of title 10), the owner or operator shall make available commercial transportation resources (including services) described in subsection (d) to the Secretary of Defense; (2) shall include such additional terms as may be established by the Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of Defense; and (3) shall allow for the modification or addition of terms upon agreement by the Secretary of Transportation and the owner or operator and the approval by the Secretary of Defense. (c) Participation after expiration of operating agreement Except as provided by section 53206, the Secretary may not require, through an emergency preparedness agreement or an operating agreement, that an owner or operator of a vessel covered by an operating agreement continue to participate in an emergency preparedness agreement after the operating agreement has expired according to its terms or is otherwise no longer in effect. After the expiration of an emergency preparedness agreement, a owner or operator may voluntarily continue to participate in the agreement. (d) Resources made available The commercial transportation resources to be made available under an emergency preparedness agreement shall include vessels or capacity in vessels, terminal facilities, management services, and other related services, or any agreed portion of such nonvessel resources for activation as the Secretary of Defense may determine to be necessary, seeking to minimize disruption of the owner or operator’s service to commercial customers. (e) Compensation (1) In general Each emergency preparedness agreement under this section shall provide that the Secretary of Defense shall pay fair and reasonable compensation for all commercial transportation resources provided pursuant to this section. (2) Specific requirements Compensation under this subsection— (A) shall not be less than the owner or operator’s commercial market charges for like transportation resources; (B) shall be fair and reasonable considering all circumstances; (C) shall be provided from the time that a vessel or resource is required by the Secretary of Defense until the time it is redelivered to the owner or operator and is available to reenter commercial service; and (D) shall be in addition to and shall not in any way reflect amounts payable under section 53207. (f) Temporary replacement vessels Notwithstanding section 55302(a), 55304, 55305, or 55314, section 2631 of title 10, or any other cargo preference law of the United States— (1) an owner or operator may operate or employ in foreign commerce a foreign-flag vessel or foreign-flag vessel capacity as a temporary replacement for a vessel of the United States or vessel of the United States capacity that is activated by the Secretary of Defense under an emergency preparedness agreement or a primary Department of Defense sealift readiness program; and (2) such replacement vessel or vessel capacity shall be eligible during the replacement period to transport preference cargoes subject to sections 55302(a), 55304, 55305, and 55314 and section 2631 of title 10 to the same extent as the eligibility of the vessel or vessel capacity replaced. (g) Redelivery and Liability of the United States for Damages (1) In general All commercial transportation resources activated under an emergency preparedness agreement shall, upon termination of the period of activation, be redelivered to the owner or operator in the same good order and condition as when received, less ordinary wear and tear, or the Secretary of Defense shall fully compensate the owner or operator for any necessary repair or replacement. (2) Limitation on United States liability Except as may be expressly agreed in an emergency preparedness agreement, or as otherwise provided by law, the Government shall not be liable for disruption of an owner or operator’s commercial business or other consequential damages to an owner or operator arising from the activation of commercial transportation resources under an emergency preparedness agreement. 53209. Regulatory relief (a) Operation in foreign commerce An owner or operator for a vessel included in an operating agreement under this chapter may operate the vessel in the foreign commerce of the United States without restriction. (b) Other restrictions The restrictions of section 55305(a) concerning the building, rebuilding, or documentation of a vessel in a foreign country shall not apply to a vessel for any day the operator of the vessel is receiving payments for the operation of that vessel under an operating agreement under this chapter. (c) Telecommunications equipment The telecommunications and other electronic equipment on an existing vessel that is redocumented under the laws of the United States for operation under an operating agreement under this chapter shall be deemed to satisfy all Federal Communications Commission equipment certification requirements, if— (1) such equipment complies with all applicable international agreements and associated guidelines as determined by the country in which the vessel was documented immediately before becoming documented under the laws of the United States; (2) that country has not been identified by the Secretary as inadequately enforcing international regulations as to that vessel; and (3) at the end of its useful life, such equipment shall be replaced with equipment that meets Federal Communications Commission equipment certification standards. 53210. Special rule regarding age of participating Fleet vessels Any age restriction under section 53202(b)(4) shall not apply to a participating Fleet vessel during the 30-month period beginning on the date the vessel begins operating under an operating agreement under this chapter, if the Secretary of Transportation determines that the owner or operator of the vessel has entered into an arrangement to obtain and operate under the operating agreement for the participating Fleet vessel a replacement vessel that, upon commencement of such operation, will be eligible to be included in the Fleet under section 53202(b). 53211. Regulations The Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of Defense may each prescribe rules as necessary to carry out their respective responsibilities under this chapter. 53212. Authorization of appropriations There is authorized to be appropriated for payments under section 53207, $60,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2035, to remain available until expended. 53213. Acquisition of Fleet vessels (a) In general Upon replacement of a Fleet vessel under an operating agreement under this chapter, and subject to agreement by the owner or operator of the vessel, the Secretary of Transportation may, subject to the concurrence of the Secretary of Defense, acquire the vessel being replaced for inclusion in the National Defense Reserve Fleet. (b) Requirements To be eligible for acquisition by the Secretary of Transportation under this section a vessel shall— (1) have been covered by an operating agreement under this chapter for not less than three years; and (2) meet recapitalization requirements for the Ready Reserve Force. (c) Fair market value A fair market value shall be established by the Maritime Administration for acquisition of an eligible vessel under this section. (d) Appropriations Vessel acquisitions under this section shall be subject to the availability of appropriations. Amounts made available to carry out this section shall be derived from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the National Defense Reserve Fleet. Amounts authorized to be appropriated to carry out the Maritime Security Program may not be use to carry out this section. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of chapters for subtitle VII of title 46, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 532. Tanker Security Fleet 53201 . (c) Deadline for accepting applications (1) In general The Secretary of Transportation shall begin accepting applications for enrollment of vessels in the Tanker Security Fleet established under chapter 532 (2) Approval Not later than 90 days after receipt of an application for the enrollment of a vessel in the Tanker Security Fleet, the Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, shall— (A) approve the application and enter into an operating agreement with the applicant; or (B) provide to the applicant a written explanation for the denial of the application. D Funding Tables 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables (a) In general Whenever a funding table in this division specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program, or activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified dollar amount for the project, program, or activity is hereby authorized, subject to the availability of appropriations. (b) Merit-based decisions A decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of a dollar amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall— (1) be based on merit-based selection procedures in accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States Code, or on competitive procedures; and (2) comply with other applicable provisions of law. (c) Relationship to transfer and programming authority An amount specified in the funding tables in this division may be transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer or reprogramming authority provided by another provision of this Act or by other law. The transfer or reprogramming of an amount specified in such funding tables shall not count against a ceiling on such transfers or reprogrammings under section 1001 or section 1512 of this Act or any other provision of law, unless such transfer or reprogramming would move funds between appropriation accounts. (d) Applicability to classified annex This section applies to any classified annex that accompanies this Act. (e) Oral and written communications No oral or written communication concerning any amount specified in the funding tables in this division shall supersede the requirements of this section. XLI Procurement 4101. Procurement SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT Line Item FY 2021 House AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY FIXED WING 002 MQ–1 UAV 75,000 Additional aircraft [75,000] 003 FUTURE UAS FAMILY 1,100 1,100 004 RQ–11 (RAVEN) 20,851 20,851 ROTARY 007 AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN 792,027 792,027 008 AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN AP 169,460 169,460 011 UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) 742,998 725,298 Unjustified costs [–17,700] 012 UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) AP 87,427 87,427 013 UH–60 BLACK HAWK L AND V MODELS 172,797 172,797 014 CH–47 HELICOPTER 160,750 266,850 Program increase [136,000] Unjustified cost growth [–29,900] 015 CH–47 HELICOPTER AP 18,372 47,372 Program increase [29,000] MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 018 UNIVERSAL GROUND CONTROL EQUIPMENT (UAS) 7,509 7,509 019 GRAY EAGLE MODS2 16,280 16,280 020 MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) 35,864 35,864 021 AH–64 MODS 118,316 113,216 Unjustified cost growth—M-DSA [–5,100] 022 CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP) 15,548 15,548 023 GRCS SEMA MODS (MIP) 2,947 2,947 024 ARL SEMA MODS (MIP) 9,598 9,598 025 EMARSS SEMA MODS (MIP) 2,452 2,452 026 UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS 13,868 13,868 027 UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS 25,842 31,342 Program increase [5,500] 028 NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN 77,432 77,432 029 COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE 101,355 101,355 031 AVIATION ASSURED PNT 54,609 54,609 032 GATM ROLLUP 12,180 12,180 034 UAS MODS 4,204 4,204 GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS 035 AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT 49,455 49,455 036 SURVIVABILITY CM 8,035 8,035 037 CMWS 10,567 10,567 038 COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) 237,467 237,467 OTHER SUPPORT 039 AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 1,789 1,789 040 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT 17,584 17,584 041 AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS 48,265 48,265 042 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 26,408 26,408 044 LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET 2,256 2,256 045 LAUNCHER GUIDED MISSILE: LONGBOW HELLFIRE XM2 8,982 8,982 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY 3,074,594 3,267,394 MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM 002 M-SHORAD—PROCUREMENT 378,654 378,654 003 MSE MISSILE 603,188 603,188 004 PRECISION STRIKE MISSILE (PRSM) 49,941 42,441 Contract delay [–7,500] 005 INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INC 2–I 106,261 25,011 Army identified funds excess to need [–40,500] Funding excess to need [–40,750] AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 006 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY 91,225 91,225 007 JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MSLS (JAGM) 213,397 213,397 008 LONG RANGE PRECISION MUNITION 45,307 45,307 ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS 009 JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY 190,325 190,325 010 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY 121,074 121,074 011 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) 850,157 850,157 012 MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR) 30,836 30,836 013 HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM (HIMARS 41,226 41,226 MODIFICATIONS 016 PATRIOT MODS 278,050 278,050 017 ATACMS MODS 141,690 141,690 020 AVENGER MODS 13,942 13,942 021 ITAS/TOW MODS 5,666 5,666 022 MLRS MODS 310,419 310,419 023 HIMARS MODIFICATIONS 6,081 6,081 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 024 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 5,090 5,090 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 025 AIR DEFENSE TARGETS 8,978 8,978 TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY 3,491,507 3,402,757 PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 002 ARMORED MULTI PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV) 192,971 172,971 Prior year carry-over [–80,000] Program increase [60,000] MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 004 STRYKER UPGRADE 847,212 1,183,052 CROWS-J program delay [–39,160] Program increase—Army UPL [375,000] 005 BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD) 493,109 435,759 Prior year carry-over [–17,350] UBIS early to need [–40,000] 006 M109 FOV MODIFICATIONS 26,893 21,893 Prior year carryover [–5,000] 007 PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM) 435,825 435,825 009 ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD) 5,074 5,074 010 ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE 19,500 19,500 011 M88 FOV MODS 18,382 13,082 Program reduction [–5,300] 012 JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE 72,178 61,878 Program delay [–10,300] 013 M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD) 392,013 386,278 Prior year carry-over [–5,735] 014 ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM 1,033,253 1,020,396 Component cost savings [–3,480] Prior year carry-over [–9,377] WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES 016 MULTI-ROLE ANTI-ARMOR ANTI-PERSONNEL WEAPON S 17,864 17,864 018 MORTAR SYSTEMS 10,288 10,288 019 XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM) 5,969 5,969 020 PRECISION SNIPER RIFLE 10,137 10,137 021 COMPACT SEMI-AUTOMATIC SNIPER SYSTEM 999 999 022 CARBINE 7,411 7,411 023 NEXT GENERATION SQUAD WEAPON 35,822 35,822 024 COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION 24,534 24,534 025 HANDGUN 4,662 4,662 MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH 026 MK–19 GRENADE MACHINE GUN MODS 6,444 6,444 027 M777 MODS 10,983 10,983 028 M4 CARBINE MODS 4,824 4,824 031 M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS 6,385 6,385 032 SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS 1,898 1,898 033 M119 MODIFICATIONS 2,009 2,009 034 MORTAR MODIFICATION 1,689 1,689 035 MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) 2,604 2,604 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 036 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) 2,763 2,763 037 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV) 3,045 3,045 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY 3,696,740 3,916,038 PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 001 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES 68,472 68,472 002 CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES 109,933 109,933 003 NEXT GENERATION SQUAD WEAPON AMMUNITION 11,988 11,988 004 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES 853 853 005 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES 58,280 58,280 006 CTG, 20MM, ALL TYPES 31,708 31,708 007 CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES 9,111 9,111 008 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES 58,172 58,172 009 CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES 114,638 114,638 MORTAR AMMUNITION 010 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES 31,222 31,222 011 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES 42,857 42,857 012 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES 107,762 107,762 TANK AMMUNITION 013 CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES 233,444 233,444 ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 014 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES 35,963 35,963 015 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES 293,692 283,692 Program delays [–10,000] 016 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982 69,159 69,159 017 ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL 232,913 232,913 MINES 018 MINES & CLEARING CHARGES, ALL TYPES 65,278 62,778 Program decrease [–2,500] 019 CLOSE TERRAIN SHAPING OBSTACLE 4,995 2,995 Program reduction [–2,000] ROCKETS 020 SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES 69,112 61,612 Prior year carryover [–7,500] 021 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES 125,915 125,915 OTHER AMMUNITION 022 CAD/PAD, ALL TYPES 8,891 8,891 023 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES 54,043 54,043 024 GRENADES, ALL TYPES 28,931 28,931 025 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES 27,036 27,036 026 SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES 10,253 10,253 MISCELLANEOUS 027 AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES 3,476 3,476 029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO) 10,569 10,569 030 AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT 12,338 12,338 031 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO) 15,908 15,908 032 CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES 99 99 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT 033 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 592,224 696,724 Program increase [104,500] 034 CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION 235,112 235,112 035 ARMS INITIATIVE 3,369 3,369 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY 2,777,716 2,860,216 OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY TACTICAL VEHICLES 001 TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS 12,986 12,986 002 SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED: 31,443 31,443 003 SEMITRAILERS, TANKERS 17,082 17,082 004 HI MOB MULTI-PURP WHLD VEH (HMMWV) 44,795 44,795 005 GROUND MOBILITY VEHICLES (GMV) 37,932 37,932 008 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE FAMILY OF VEHICL 894,414 894,414 009 TRUCK, DUMP, 20T (CCE) 29,368 29,368 010 FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) 95,092 95,092 011 FAMILY OF COLD WEATHER ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE (C 999 999 012 FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIP 27,687 27,687 014 PLS ESP 21,969 21,969 015 HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV 65,635 132,635 Program increase [67,000] 016 HMMWV RECAPITALIZATION PROGRAM 5,927 5,927 017 TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS 36,497 36,497 018 MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP 114,977 114,977 NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES 020 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 1,246 1,246 021 NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER 19,870 19,870 COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS 022 SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 160,469 150,469 Unit cost growth [–10,000] 023 TACTICAL NETWORK TECHNOLOGY MOD IN SVC 360,379 337,879 Program delays [–10,000] Unit cost growth [–12,500] 024 SITUATION INFORMATION TRANSPORT 63,396 63,396 026 JCSE EQUIPMENT (USRDECOM) 5,170 5,170 COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 029 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS 101,498 101,498 030 TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS 72,450 64,950 Program delays [–7,500] 031 SHF TERM 13,173 13,173 032 ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING 134,928 134,928 033 SMART-T (SPACE) 8,611 8,611 034 GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS 8,191 8,191 COMM—C3 SYSTEM 036 COE TACTICAL SERVER INFRASTRUCTURE (TSI) 94,871 94,871 COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 037 HANDHELD MANPACK SMALL FORM FIT (HMS) 550,848 550,848 038 RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2) 8,237 8,237 041 SPIDER FAMILY OF NETWORKED MUNITIONS INCR 13,967 0 Program cancellation [–13,967] 043 UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE 19,579 19,579 044 COTS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 94,156 94,156 045 FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE 18,313 18,313 046 ARMY COMMUNICATIONS & ELECTRONICS 51,480 51,480 COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM 048 CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE (MIP) 13,146 13,146 049 DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION INITIATIVE 5,624 5,624 INFORMATION SECURITY 051 INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP 4,596 4,596 052 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC) 159,272 149,272 Program decrease [–10,000] 053 DEFENSIVE CYBER OPERATIONS 54,753 54,753 054 INSIDER THREAT PROGRAM—UNIT ACTIVITY MONITO 1,760 1,760 056 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (INFO SECURITY) 260 260 COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS 057 BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS 29,761 29,761 COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS 058 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 147,696 147,696 059 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 4,900 4,900 060 HOME STATION MISSION COMMAND CENTERS (HSMCC) 15,227 15,227 061 JOINT INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (JIE) 3,177 3,177 062 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM 300,035 280,035 Unjustified growth [–20,000] ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 065 JTT/CIBS-M (MIP) 5,304 5,304 066 TERRESTRIAL LAYER SYSTEMS (TLS) (MIP) 8,081 8,081 068 DCGS-A (MIP) 151,886 151,886 070 TROJAN (MIP) 17,593 17,593 071 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) 28,558 28,558 073 BIOMETRIC TACTICAL COLLECTION DEVICES (MIP) 999 999 ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 075 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR 5,332 5,332 076 EW PLANNING & MANAGEMENT TOOLS (EWPMT) 7,849 7,849 077 AIR VIGILANCE (AV) (MIP) 8,160 8,160 079 MULTI-FUNCTION ELECTRONIC WARFARE (MFEW) SYST 8,669 8,669 082 CI MODERNIZATION (MIP) 300 300 ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) 083 SENTINEL MODS 58,884 58,884 084 NIGHT VISION DEVICES 1,127,375 897,375 IVAS reduction [–230,000] 086 SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF 13,954 13,954 088 INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS 10,069 10,069 089 FAMILY OF WEAPON SIGHTS (FWS) 133,590 115,090 Program decrease [–18,500] 091 JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P) 243,850 226,350 Program delays [–17,500] 092 JOINT EFFECTS TARGETING SYSTEM (JETS) 69,641 50,541 Early to need [–19,100] 094 COMPUTER BALLISTICS: LHMBC XM32 7,509 7,509 095 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM 3,800 3,800 096 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEMS MODIFICATIONS 7,292 7,292 097 COUNTERFIRE RADARS 72,421 71,421 Excess to need [–1,000] ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS 098 ARMY COMMAND POST INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE ( 49,947 49,947 099 FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY 9,390 9,390 100 AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS 47,374 47,374 101 IAMD BATTLE COMMAND SYSTEM 201,587 191,587 Program reduction [–10,000] 102 LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS) 4,495 4,495 103 NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE 18,651 18,651 105 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A) 2,792 2,792 106 INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPP 9,071 9,071 107 RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET 12,117 12,117 108 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (ENFIRE) 3,004 5,004 Program increase [2,000] ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION 109 ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION 14,574 14,574 110 AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP 140,619 140,619 111 GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEMS FAM 4,448 4,448 112 HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PGM (HPCMP) 68,405 68,405 113 CONTRACT WRITING SYSTEM 8,459 8,459 114 CSS COMMUNICATIONS 57,651 57,651 115 RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS) 14,848 14,848 ELECT EQUIP—AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V) 117 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT) 4,995 4,995 ELECT EQUIP—SUPPORT 119 BCT EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES 16,983 8,983 Program reduction [–8,000] CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 19A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 1,582 1,582 CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT 123 CBRN DEFENSE 28,456 28,456 124 SMOKE & OBSCURANT FAMILY: SOF (NON AAO ITEM) 13,995 13,995 BRIDGING EQUIPMENT 125 TACTICAL BRIDGING 10,545 10,545 126 TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON 72,074 72,074 127 BRIDGE SUPPLEMENTAL SET 32,493 32,493 128 COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER (CBT) RECAP 62,978 62,978 ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT 129 HANDHELD STANDOFF MINEFIELD DETECTION SYS-HST 5,570 5,570 130 GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS) 2,497 2,497 132 HUSKY MOUNTED DETECTION SYSTEM (HMDS) 109,069 99,069 Program reduction [–10,000] 134 EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION 36,584 36,584 135 ROBOTICS AND APPLIQUE SYSTEMS 179,544 174,744 SMET contract delay [–4,800] 137 RENDER SAFE SETS KITS OUTFITS 64,583 64,583 139 FAMILY OF BOATS AND MOTORS 5,289 5,289 COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 140 HEATERS AND ECU'S 8,200 8,200 142 PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) 4,625 4,625 143 GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM 154,937 154,937 144 MOBILE SOLDIER POWER 34,297 34,297 147 CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM 53,021 53,021 148 FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS 23,324 23,324 149 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT) 8,014 8,014 PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT 150 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER 78,448 78,448 MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 151 COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL 59,485 64,485 Future Warfighter Shelter [5,000] MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 152 MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS 40,337 40,337 153 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ) 5,386 5,386 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 154 GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE) 5,406 5,406 155 SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING 4,188 4,188 156 LOADERS 4,521 4,521 157 HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR 5,186 5,186 158 TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED 4,715 4,715 159 ALL TERRAIN CRANES 70,560 70,560 162 CONST EQUIP ESP 8,925 8,925 RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT 164 ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP 40,910 40,910 165 MANEUVER SUPPORT VESSEL (MSV) 76,576 76,576 166 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL) 1,844 1,844 GENERATORS 167 GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP 53,433 53,433 168 TACTICAL ELECTRIC POWER RECAPITALIZATION 22,216 22,216 MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT 169 FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS 16,145 16,145 TRAINING EQUIPMENT 170 COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT 90,580 90,580 171 TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM 161,814 161,814 172 SYNTHETIC TRAINING ENVIRONMENT (STE) 13,063 13,063 175 GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING 1,950 1,950 TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD) 176 CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT 2,511 2,511 177 INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE) 78,578 73,578 Program reduction [–5,000] 178 TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD) 14,941 14,941 OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 180 RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 8,629 8,629 181 PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) 75,499 72,299 Early to need [–3,200] 182 BASE LEVEL COMMON EQUIPMENT 27,444 27,444 183 MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3) 32,485 32,485 187 SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR TEST AND EVALUATION 39,436 39,436 OPA2 189 INITIAL SPARES—C&E 9,950 9,950 TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY 8,625,206 8,288,139 AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY COMBAT AIRCRAFT 001 F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET 1,761,146 1,761,146 002 F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET AP 28,100 FY22 aircraft [28,100] 003 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV 2,181,780 2,106,680 Excess depot standup funding [–6,500] F135 affordability challenges [–21,000] Lot 15 target cost savings [–41,600] Unjustified ALIS funding [–6,000] 004 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV AP 330,386 330,386 005 JSF STOVL 1,109,393 1,053,893 Excess depot standup funding [–5,000] F135 affordability challenges [–15,000] Lot 15 target cost savings [–18,000] Unjustified ALIS funding [–10,000] Unjustified production engineering support [–7,500] 006 JSF STOVL AP 303,035 303,035 007 CH–53K (HEAVY LIFT) 813,324 813,324 008 CH–53K (HEAVY LIFT) AP 201,188 201,188 009 V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) 934,793 1,146,193 Navy UPL [211,400] 010 V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) AP 39,547 39,547 011 H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z) 7,267 7,267 013 P–8A POSEIDON 80,134 1,020,034 Line shutdown early to need [–80,100] Six additional aircraft [1,020,000] 015 E–2D ADV HAWKEYE 626,109 626,109 016 E–2D ADV HAWKEYE AP 123,166 123,166 TRAINER AIRCRAFT 017 ADVANCED HELICOPTER TRAINING SYSTEM 269,867 269,867 OTHER AIRCRAFT 018 KC–130J 380,984 380,984 019 KC–130J AP 67,022 67,022 021 MQ–4 TRITON 150,570 280,570 One additional aircraft [130,000] 023 MQ–8 UAV 40,375 40,375 024 STUASL0 UAV 30,930 30,930 026 VH–92A EXECUTIVE HELO 610,231 610,231 MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 028 F–18 A-D UNIQUE 208,261 208,261 029 F–18E/F AND EA–18G MODERNIZATION AND SUSTAINM 468,954 468,954 030 AEA SYSTEMS 21,061 21,061 031 AV–8 SERIES 34,082 34,082 032 INFRARED SEARCH AND TRACK (IRST) 158,055 158,055 033 ADVERSARY 42,946 42,946 034 F–18 SERIES 379,351 379,351 035 H–53 SERIES 74,771 74,771 036 MH–60 SERIES 131,584 136,584 Program increase [5,000] 037 H–1 SERIES 185,140 185,140 038 EP–3 SERIES 26,602 26,602 040 E–2 SERIES 175,540 175,540 041 TRAINER A/C SERIES 7,085 7,085 042 C–2A 9,525 9,525 043 C–130 SERIES 141,705 141,705 044 FEWSG 684 684 045 CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES 8,911 8,911 046 E–6 SERIES 197,206 197,206 047 EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES 29,086 29,086 049 T–45 SERIES 155,745 155,745 050 POWER PLANT CHANGES 24,633 24,633 051 JPATS SERIES 22,682 22,682 052 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODS 40,401 40,401 053 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT 138,480 138,480 054 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES 143,322 143,322 055 COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM 2,142 2,142 056 ID SYSTEMS 35,999 35,999 057 P–8 SERIES 180,530 180,530 058 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION 27,794 27,794 059 MQ–8 SERIES 28,774 28,774 060 V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY 334,405 334,405 061 NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) 176,638 176,638 062 F–35 STOVL SERIES 153,588 146,388 Block IV/TR3 upgrade delays [–7,200] 063 F–35 CV SERIES 105,452 99,552 Block IV/TR3 upgrade delays [–5,900] 064 QRC 126,618 126,618 065 MQ–4 SERIES 12,998 12,998 066 RQ–21 SERIES 18,550 18,550 AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 070 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 2,198,460 2,198,460 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES 071 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT 543,559 543,559 072 AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 75,685 75,685 073 WAR CONSUMABLES 40,633 40,633 074 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 21,194 21,194 075 SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 155,179 155,179 076 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 2,121 2,121 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY 17,127,378 18,298,078 WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 001 TRIDENT II MODS 1,173,837 1,173,837 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 002 MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 7,275 7,275 STRATEGIC MISSILES 003 TOMAHAWK 277,694 277,694 TACTICAL MISSILES 004 AMRAAM 326,952 326,952 005 SIDEWINDER 126,485 126,485 007 STANDARD MISSILE 456,206 456,206 008 STANDARD MISSILE AP 66,716 66,716 009 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB II 78,867 78,867 010 RAM 90,533 90,533 011 JOINT AIR GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) 49,386 49,386 014 AERIAL TARGETS 174,336 174,336 015 DRONES AND DECOYS 41,256 41,256 016 OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT 3,501 3,501 017 LRASM 168,845 168,845 018 LCS OTH MISSILE 32,910 32,910 MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 019 TOMAHAWK MODS 164,915 164,915 020 ESSM 215,375 206,475 Excessive production support growth [–8,900] 022 HARM MODS 147,572 147,572 023 STANDARD MISSILES MODS 83,654 17,254 SM–2 Blk IIC excessive concurrency [–66,400] SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 024 WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 1,996 1,996 025 FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON 53,401 53,401 ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 027 ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 215,659 215,659 TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 028 SSTD 5,811 5,811 029 MK–48 TORPEDO 284,901 284,901 030 ASW TARGETS 13,833 13,833 MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 031 MK–54 TORPEDO MODS 110,286 110,286 032 MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS 57,214 57,214 033 MARITIME MINES 5,832 5,832 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 034 TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 97,581 97,581 035 ASW RANGE SUPPORT 4,159 4,159 DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 036 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 4,106 4,106 GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 037 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS 16,030 16,030 MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 038 CIWS MODS 37,147 37,147 039 COAST GUARD WEAPONS 45,804 45,804 040 GUN MOUNT MODS 74,427 74,427 041 LCS MODULE WEAPONS 4,253 4,253 042 AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS 6,662 6,662 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 045 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 159,578 159,578 TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY 4,884,995 4,809,695 PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC NAVY AMMUNITION 001 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 41,496 41,496 002 JDAM 64,631 64,631 003 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES 60,719 60,719 004 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION 11,158 11,158 005 PRACTICE BOMBS 51,409 51,409 006 CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES 64,694 64,694 007 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES 51,523 51,523 008 JATOS 6,761 6,761 009 5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION 31,517 31,517 010 INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION 38,005 38,005 011 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION 40,626 40,626 012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO 48,202 48,202 013 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION 9,766 9,766 015 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION 2,115 2,115 MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION 016 MORTARS 46,781 46,781 017 DIRECT SUPPORT MUNITIONS 119,504 79,662 USMC identified funds excess to need [–39,842] 018 INFANTRY WEAPONS AMMUNITION 83,220 83,220 019 COMBAT SUPPORT MUNITIONS 32,650 32,650 020 AMMO MODERNIZATION 15,144 15,144 021 ARTILLERY MUNITIONS 59,539 59,539 022 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 4,142 4,142 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC 883,602 843,760 SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE SHIPS 001 OHIO REPLACEMENT SUBMARINE 2,891,475 2,891,475 002 OHIO REPLACEMENT SUBMARINE AP 1,123,175 1,123,175 OTHER WARSHIPS 003 CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 997,544 907,544 Full funding early to need [–90,000] 004 CVN–81 1,645,606 1,465,606 Full funding early to need [–180,000] 005 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE 2,334,693 4,630,693 Restore second Virginia-class SSN [2,296,000] 006 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE 1,901,187 2,173,187 Restore second Virginia-class SSN [272,000] 007 CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS 1,878,453 1,878,453 008 CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS AP 17,384 17,384 009 DDG 1000 78,205 78,205 010 DDG–51 3,040,270 3,040,270 011 DDG–51 AP 29,297 29,297 013 FFG-FRIGATE 1,053,123 954,523 Anticipated learning curve [–98,600] AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS 014 LPD FLIGHT II 1,155,801 1,118,101 Excessive unit cost growth [–37,700] 019 EXPEDITIONARY FAST TRANSPORT (EPF) 260,000 One additional ship [260,000] AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST 022 TOWING, SALVAGE, AND RESCUE SHIP (ATS) 168,209 168,209 023 LCU 1700 87,395 87,395 024 OUTFITTING 825,586 825,586 026 SERVICE CRAFT 249,781 249,781 027 LCAC SLEP 56,461 56,461 028 COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS 369,112 369,112 TOTAL SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY 19,902,757 22,324,457 OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT 001 SURFACE POWER EQUIPMENT 11,738 11,738 GENERATORS 002 SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E 58,497 58,497 NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT 003 OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT 74,084 74,084 OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT 004 SUB PERISCOPE, IMAGING AND SUPT EQUIP PROG 204,806 204,806 005 DDG MOD 547,569 531,169 Excessive CSSQT cost growth [–16,400] 006 FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT 18,394 18,394 007 COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD 2,374 2,374 008 LHA/LHD MIDLIFE 78,265 78,265 009 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT 23,035 23,035 010 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 64,632 60,132 Excess cost growth [–4,500] 011 VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 22,868 22,868 012 LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 3,976 3,976 013 SUBMARINE BATTERIES 31,322 31,322 014 LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 50,475 55,475 Electronic actuator pilot program [5,000] 015 DDG 1000 CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 42,279 36,779 Excess cost growth [–5,500] 016 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP 15,429 15,429 017 DSSP EQUIPMENT 2,918 2,918 018 CG MODERNIZATION 87,978 87,978 019 LCAC 9,366 9,366 020 UNDERWATER EOD EQUIPMENT 16,842 16,842 021 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 105,715 95,715 Cost growth [–10,000] 022 CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS 3,044 3,044 023 SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM 5,885 5,885 REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT 024 SHIP MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND MODERNIZATION 1,260,721 400,621 LCS in-service modernization excess cost growth [–12,100] Realignment to OPN–24A for Shipyard Infrastructure Optimization Plan [–198,000] Transfer to O&M for ship depot maintenance [–650,000] 024A SHIPYARD INFRASTRUCTURE OPTIMIZATION PLAN 198,000 Realignment from OPN–24 for Shipyard Infrastructure Optimization Plan [198,000] 025 REACTOR POWER UNITS 5,305 5,305 026 REACTOR COMPONENTS 415,404 415,404 OCEAN ENGINEERING 027 DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT 11,143 11,143 SMALL BOATS 028 STANDARD BOATS 52,371 52,371 PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT 029 OPERATING FORCES IPE 233,667 233,667 OTHER SHIP SUPPORT 030 LCS COMMON MISSION MODULES EQUIPMENT 39,714 39,714 031 LCS MCM MISSION MODULES 218,822 167,922 COBRA early to need [–9,300] Program Decrease [–41,600] 032 LCS ASW MISSION MODULES 61,759 61,759 033 LCS SUW MISSION MODULES 24,412 24,412 034 LCS IN-SERVICE MODERNIZATION 121,848 151,848 Preservation of LCS 3 and LCS 4 [30,000] 035 SMALL & MEDIUM UUV 67,709 43,709 Early to need based on IOTE schedule [–24,000] SHIP SONARS 037 SPQ–9B RADAR 27,517 27,517 038 AN/SQQ–89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM 128,664 128,664 039 SSN ACOUSTIC EQUIPMENT 374,737 374,737 040 UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 9,286 9,286 ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 041 SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM 26,066 26,066 042 SSTD 13,241 13,241 043 FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM 193,446 193,446 044 SURTASS 63,838 63,838 ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT 045 AN/SLQ–32 387,195 387,195 RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT 046 SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT 235,744 223,644 Excess cost growth [–12,100] 047 AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS) 3,862 3,862 OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 048 COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY 26,006 26,006 049 NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS) 15,385 15,385 050 ATDLS 103,835 103,835 051 NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS) 3,594 3,594 052 MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT 15,744 15,744 053 SHALLOW WATER MCM 5,493 5,493 054 NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE) 38,043 38,043 055 AMERICAN FORCES RADIO AND TV SERVICE 2,592 2,592 056 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP 7,985 7,985 AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 057 ASHORE ATC EQUIPMENT 83,475 83,475 058 AFLOAT ATC EQUIPMENT 65,113 65,113 059 ID SYSTEMS 23,815 23,815 060 JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEM ( 100,751 100,751 061 NAVAL MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS 13,947 13,947 OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 062 MARITIME INTEGRATED BROADCAST SYSTEM 1,375 1,375 063 TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS 22,771 22,771 064 DCGS-N 18,872 18,872 065 CANES 389,585 389,585 066 RADIAC 10,335 10,335 067 CANES-INTELL 48,654 48,654 068 GPETE 8,133 8,133 069 MASF 4,150 4,150 070 INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY 5,934 5,934 071 EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION 4,334 4,334 072 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 159,815 159,815 SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS 073 SHIPBOARD TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS 56,106 56,106 074 SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION 124,288 124,288 075 COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M 45,120 45,120 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS 076 SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT 31,133 31,133 077 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 62,214 62,214 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 078 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 47,421 47,421 079 NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT) 64,552 64,552 SHORE COMMUNICATIONS 080 JOINT COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT ELEMENT (JCSE) 4,398 4,398 CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT 081 INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) 157,551 147,551 Program decrease [–10,000] 082 MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM 985 985 CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT 083 CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP 15,906 15,906 OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT 090 COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT 70,689 70,689 SONOBUOYS 092 SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES 237,639 286,639 Inventory increase [49,000] AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 093 MINOTAUR 5,077 5,077 094 WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 83,969 83,969 095 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 187,758 187,758 096 ADVANCED ARRESTING GEAR (AAG) 16,059 16,059 097 METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT 15,192 15,192 099 LEGACY AIRBORNE MCM 6,674 6,674 100 LAMPS EQUIPMENT 1,189 1,189 101 AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 58,873 58,873 102 UMCS-UNMAN CARRIER AVIATION(UCA)MISSION CNTRL 60,937 60,937 SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT 103 SHIP GUN SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 5,540 5,540 SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 104 HARPOON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 208 208 105 SHIP MISSILE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 262,077 252,077 Excess cost growth [–10,000] 106 TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 84,087 76,087 TMPC cost growth [–8,000] FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 107 STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP 258,910 258,910 ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 108 SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS 173,770 173,770 109 ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 26,584 26,584 OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 110 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP 7,470 7,470 111 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 6,356 6,356 OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE 112 ANTI-SHIP MISSILE DECOY SYSTEM 86,356 86,356 113 SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS 69,240 69,240 114 SURFACE TRAINING EQUIPMENT 192,245 192,245 CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 115 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 6,123 6,123 116 GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS 2,693 2,693 117 CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP 47,301 47,301 118 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 10,352 10,352 119 TACTICAL VEHICLES 31,475 31,475 121 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT 2,630 2,630 122 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 47,972 47,972 123 PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES 1,171 1,171 SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 124 SUPPLY EQUIPMENT 19,693 19,693 125 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 4,956 4,956 126 SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS 668,639 638,639 Program decrease [–30,000] TRAINING DEVICES 127 TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 4,026 4,026 128 TRAINING AND EDUCATION EQUIPMENT 73,454 73,454 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 129 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 32,390 32,390 130 MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 974 974 132 NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 5,606 5,606 133 OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 16,024 16,024 134 C4ISR EQUIPMENT 6,697 6,697 135 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 27,503 27,503 136 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 138,281 138,281 137 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 42,680 42,680 OTHER 140 NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE SERVICE 184,443 184,443 141 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 16,523 16,523 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 41A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 18,446 18,446 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 142 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 374,195 421,195 SPY–1 battle spare [47,000] TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY 10,948,518 10,236,018 PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 001 AAV7A1 PIP 87,476 87,476 002 AMPHIBIOUS COMBAT VEHICLE FAMILY OF VEHICLES 478,874 478,874 003 LAV PIP 41,988 41,988 ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS 004 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER 59 59 005 ARTILLERY WEAPONS SYSTEM 174,687 234,337 Ground Based Anti-Ship Missiles—USMC UPL [59,650] 006 WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION 24,867 24,867 OTHER SUPPORT 007 MODIFICATION KITS 3,067 0 USMC funds identified excess to need [–3,067] GUIDED MISSILES 008 GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE 18,920 18,920 009 ANTI-ARMOR MISSILE-JAVELIN 19,888 19,888 010 FAMILY ANTI-ARMOR WEAPON SYSTEMS (FOAAWS) 21,891 21,891 011 ANTI-ARMOR MISSILE-TOW 34,985 34,985 012 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) 133,689 133,689 COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS 013 COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (C 35,057 35,057 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 014 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 24,405 24,405 OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) 015 MODIFICATION KITS 1,006 1,006 COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) 016 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) 69,725 69,725 017 AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS 15,611 15,611 RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 019 GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR) 284,283 284,283 INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 020 GCSS-MC 1,587 1,587 021 FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM 24,934 24,934 022 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 50,728 50,728 024 UNMANNED AIR SYSTEMS (INTEL) 24,853 24,853 025 DCGS-MC 38,260 38,260 026 UAS PAYLOADS 5,489 5,489 OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) 029 NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE NETWORK (NGEN) 78,922 78,922 030 COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES 35,349 35,349 031 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS 33,713 33,713 032 RADIO SYSTEMS 343,250 343,250 033 COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS 40,627 40,627 034 COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT 43,782 43,782 035 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 53,896 53,896 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 36A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 3,797 3,797 ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES 037 COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES 22,460 22,460 TACTICAL VEHICLES 038 MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS 10,739 10,739 039 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE 381,675 381,675 040 FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS 2,963 2,963 ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 042 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT 385 385 043 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS 501 501 044 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED 23,430 23,430 045 AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 5,752 5,752 046 EOD SYSTEMS 20,939 20,939 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 047 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 23,063 23,063 GENERAL PROPERTY 048 FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 4,187 4,187 049 TRAINING DEVICES 101,765 101,765 050 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 19,305 19,305 051 ULTRA-LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (ULTV) 678 678 OTHER SUPPORT 052 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 9,174 9,174 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 053 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 27,295 27,295 TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS 2,903,976 2,960,559 AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE TACTICAL FORCES 001 F–35 4,567,018 4,236,018 Excess depot standup funding [–22,000] Excess miscellaneous support costs [–156,000] Excess production engineering support [–10,000] F135 affordability challenges [–48,000] Lot 15 target cost savings [–75,000] Unjustified ALIS funding [–20,000] 002 F–35 AP 610,800 610,800 004 F–15EX 1,269,847 1,269,847 005 F–15EX AP 133,500 133,500 TACTICAL AIRLIFT 007 KC–46A MDAP 2,850,151 2,189,151 Decrease quantity by three aircraft [–462,000] Prior year carryover [–119,000] Spares excess to need due to quantity decrease [–40,000] Wing Air Refueling Pods early to need [–40,000] OTHER AIRLIFT 008 C–130J 37,131 37,131 010 MC–130J 362,807 241,807 Prior year carryover [–121,000] 011 MC–130J AP 39,987 29,987 FY22 quantity reduction [–10,000] HELICOPTERS 012 UH–1N REPLACEMENT 194,016 194,016 013 COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER 973,473 973,473 MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT 015 CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C 2,811 11,211 Program Increase [8,400] OTHER AIRCRAFT 016 TARGET DRONES 133,273 133,273 018 COMPASS CALL 161,117 291,117 Program increase [130,000] 020 MQ–9 29,409 120,209 Program increase [108,000] Unjustified request [–17,200] STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT 022 B–1 3,853 3,853 023 B–2A 31,476 31,476 024 B–1B 21,808 1,808 Slow modernization execution [–20,000] 025 B–52 53,949 22,249 GPS IU early to need [–28,700] Tactical data link contract delay [–3,000] 025A LONG-RANGE STRIKE BOMBER ADVANCED PROCUREMENT 20,000 Advanced procurement [20,000] 026 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES 9,999 9,999 TACTICAL AIRCRAFT 027 A–10 135,793 135,793 028 E–11 BACN/HAG 33,645 33,645 029 F–15 349,304 349,304 030 F–16 615,760 615,760 032 F–22A 387,905 361,705 Contract delays [–26,200] 033 F–35 MODIFICATIONS 322,185 290,485 Block IV/TR3 delays [–31,700] 034 F–15 EPAW 31,995 27,195 Concurrency [–4,800] 035 INCREMENT 3.2B 5,889 5,889 036 KC–46A MDAP 24,085 9,085 Excessive airworthiness directives and service bulletins [–15,000] AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT 037 C–5 62,108 50,008 Unjustified PMA cost growth [–12,100] 038 C–17A 66,798 56,798 BLOS ahead of need [–10,000] 040 C–32A 2,947 2,947 041 C–37A 12,985 5,985 SATCOM installs ahead of need [–7,000] TRAINER AIRCRAFT 042 GLIDER MODS 977 977 043 T–6 26,829 26,829 044 T–1 4,465 4,465 045 T–38 36,806 41,806 T–38 ejection seat improvements [5,000] OTHER AIRCRAFT 046 U–2 MODS 110,618 110,618 047 KC–10A (ATCA) 117 117 049 VC–25A MOD 1,983 1,983 050 C–40 9,252 7,252 SATCOM installs ahead of need [–2,000] 051 C–130 5,871 140,671 AMP 1 excess to need [–3,800] Eight-bladed propeller upgrade kits only [55,000] Improved modular airborne fire fighting system (iMAFFS) [4,600] T–56 3.5 engine mod [79,000] 052 C–130J MODS 140,032 140,032 053 C–135 88,250 86,450 Other government cost growth [–1,800] 055 COMPASS CALL 193,389 193,389 057 RC–135 191,332 191,332 058 E–3 172,141 172,141 059 E–4 58,803 58,803 060 E–8 11,037 38,037 Program increase [27,000] 061 AIRBORNE WARNING AND CNTRL SYS (AWACS) 40/45 53,343 53,343 062 FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS 1,573 1,573 063 H–1 4,410 4,410 064 H–60 44,538 44,538 065 RQ–4 MODS 40,468 40,468 066 HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS 20,780 20,780 067 OTHER AIRCRAFT 100,774 100,774 068 MQ–9 MODS 188,387 188,387 070 CV–22 MODS 122,306 328,506 SOCOM UPL [206,200] AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 071 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS 926,683 915,383 Unobligated balances—F–16s [–11,300] COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 073 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP 132,719 132,719 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT 074 B–2A 1,683 1,683 075 B–2B 46,734 46,734 076 B–52 1,034 1,034 079 E–11 BACN/HAG 63,419 63,419 080 F–15 2,632 2,632 081 F–16 14,163 14,163 083 OTHER AIRCRAFT 4,595 4,595 084 RQ–4 POST PRODUCTION CHARGES 32,585 32,585 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS 085 INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIVENESS 18,215 18,215 WAR CONSUMABLES 086 WAR CONSUMABLES 36,046 36,046 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 087 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 1,439,640 1,439,640 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 89A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 21,692 21,692 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 17,908,145 17,233,745 MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT—BALLISTIC 001 MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC 75,012 75,012 TACTICAL 002 REPLAC EQUIP & WAR CONSUMABLES 4,495 4,495 004 JOINT AIR-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE 475,949 475,949 005 LRASM0 19,800 19,800 006 SIDEWINDER (AIM–9X) 164,769 164,769 007 AMRAAM 453,223 453,223 008 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE 40,129 40,129 009 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB 45,475 45,475 010 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB II 273,272 273,272 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 011 INDUSTR'L PREPAREDNS/POL PREVENTION 814 814 CLASS IV 013 ICBM FUZE MOD 3,458 3,458 014 ICBM FUZE MOD AP 43,450 43,450 015 MM III MODIFICATIONS 85,310 85,310 016 AGM–65D MAVERICK 298 298 017 AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) 52,924 52,924 MISSILE SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 018 MSL SPRS/REPAIR PARTS (INITIAL) 9,402 9,402 019 MSL SPRS/REPAIR PARTS (REPLEN) 84,671 84,671 SPECIAL PROGRAMS 025 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS 23,501 23,501 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 25A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 540,465 540,465 TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 2,396,417 2,396,417 PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE ROCKETS 001 ROCKETS 14,962 14,962 CARTRIDGES 002 CARTRIDGES 123,365 123,365 BOMBS 003 PRACTICE BOMBS 59,725 59,725 006 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION 206,989 206,989 007 B61 35,634 35,634 OTHER ITEMS 009 CAD/PAD 47,830 47,830 010 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) 6,232 6,232 011 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 542 542 012 MODIFICATIONS 1,310 1,310 013 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 4,753 4,753 FLARES 015 FLARES 40,088 40,088 FUZES 016 FUZES 40,983 40,983 SMALL ARMS 017 SMALL ARMS 13,925 13,925 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE 596,338 596,338 PROCUREMENT, SPACE FORCE SPACE PROCUREMENT, SF 001 ADVANCED EHF 14,823 14,823 002 AF SATELLITE COMM SYSTEM 48,326 43,326 Insufficient justification [–5,000] 003 COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS 65,540 57,540 Insufficient justification [–8,000] 004 FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS 66,190 66,190 005 GENERAL INFORMATION TECH—SPACE 3,299 3,299 006 GPSIII FOLLOW ON 627,796 612,796 Unjustified growth [–15,000] 007 GPS III SPACE SEGMENT 20,122 20,122 008 GLOBAL POSTIONING (SPACE) 2,256 2,256 009 SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC) 35,495 35,495 010 MILSATCOM 15,795 15,795 011 SBIR HIGH (SPACE) 160,891 160,891 012 SPECIAL SPACE ACTIVITIES 78,387 78,387 013 NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE LAUNCH 1,043,171 1,043,171 014 NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM 6,638 6,638 015 ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM 47,741 47,741 016 SPACE FENCE 11,279 11,279 017 SPACE MODS 96,551 86,551 Insufficient justification [–10,000] 018 SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE 100,492 100,492 SPARES 019 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 1,272 1,272 TOTAL PROCUREMENT, SPACE FORCE 2,446,064 2,408,064 OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 001 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 9,016 9,016 CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES 002 MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE 15,058 15,058 003 CAP VEHICLES 1,059 1,800 Program increase [741] 004 CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES 38,920 38,920 SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 005 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE 30,544 30,544 006 SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES 319 319 007 SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 43,157 34,381 Program decrease [–2,500] Unjustified request [–6,276] FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 008 FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES 8,621 8,621 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 009 MATERIALS HANDLING VEHICLES 12,897 12,897 BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 010 RUNWAY SNOW REMOV AND CLEANING EQU 3,577 3,577 011 BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT VEHICLES 43,095 43,095 COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC) 013 COMSEC EQUIPMENT 54,864 54,864 INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS 014 INTERNATIONAL INTEL TECH & ARCHITECTURES 9,283 9,283 015 INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT 6,849 6,849 016 INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT 33,471 33,471 ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS 017 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYS 29,409 29,409 018 BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM—FIXED 7,909 7,909 019 THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPROVEMEN 32,632 32,632 020 WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST 33,021 33,021 021 STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL 31,353 31,353 022 CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX 10,314 10,314 023 MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS 15,132 15,132 025 INTEGRATED STRAT PLAN & ANALY NETWORK (ISPAN) 9,806 9,806 SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS 026 GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 39,887 39,887 027 AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYS 2,602 2,602 029 MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL 10,541 10,541 030 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM 96,277 93,777 Program decrease [–2,500] 031 COMBAT TRAINING RANGES 195,185 195,185 032 MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMM N 29,664 29,664 033 WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE (WAS) 59,633 59,633 034 C3 COUNTERMEASURES 105,584 105,584 036 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE ACCOUNTING & MGT SYS 899 899 038 THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYSTEM 3,392 3,392 039 AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) 24,983 24,983 AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS 041 BASE INFORMATION TRANSPT INFRAST (BITI) WIRED 19,147 19,147 042 AFNET 84,515 84,515 043 JOINT COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT ELEMENT (JCSE) 6,185 6,185 044 USCENTCOM 19,649 19,649 045 USSTRATCOM 4,337 4,337 ORGANIZATION AND BASE 046 TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT 137,033 137,033 047 RADIO EQUIPMENT 15,264 15,264 049 BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE 132,281 132,281 MODIFICATIONS 050 COMM ELECT MODS 21,471 21,471 PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP 051 PERSONAL SAFETY AND RESCUE EQUIPMENT 49,578 49,578 DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS HANDLING EQ 052 POWER CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT 11,454 11,454 053 MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP 12,110 12,110 BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 054 BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT 21,142 21,142 055 ENGINEERING AND EOD EQUIPMENT 7,700 7,700 056 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT 18,266 22,966 Program increase [4,700] 057 FUELS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (FSE) 9,601 9,601 058 BASE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 42,078 30,378 Program decrease [–4,700] Unjustified request [–7,000] SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS 060 DARP RC135 27,164 27,164 061 DCGS-AF 121,528 121,528 063 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM 782,641 782,641 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 63A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 21,086,112 21,026,112 Program adjustment [–60,000] SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 064 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS (CYBER) 1,664 1,664 065 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 15,847 15,847 TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 23,695,720 23,618,185 PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD 026 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DPAA 500 500 049 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD 3,099 3,099 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA 048 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) 101 101 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS 053 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS 515 515 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 011 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY 17,211 17,211 012 TELEPORT PROGRAM 29,841 29,841 013 JOINT FORCES HEADQUARTERS—DODIN 3,091 3,091 014 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 41,569 41,569 016 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK 26,978 26,978 017 WHITE HOUSE COMMUNICATION AGENCY 44,161 44,161 018 SENIOR LEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE 35,935 35,935 019 JOINT REGIONAL SECURITY STACKS (JRSS) 88,741 8,741 Program decrease [–80,000] 020 JOINT SERVICE PROVIDER 157,538 157,538 021 FOURTH ESTATE NETWORK OPTIMIZATION (4ENO) 42,084 42,084 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA 023 MAJOR EQUIPMENT 417,459 417,459 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCSA 003 MAJOR EQUIPMENT 2,212 2,212 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS 050 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS 8,329 8,329 051 MAJOR EQUIPMENT—TJS CYBER 1,247 1,247 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY 031 THAAD 495,396 601,396 THAAD battery #8 [106,000] 034 AEGIS BMD 356,195 356,195 035 AEGIS BMD AP 44,901 44,901 037 SM–3 IIAS 218,322 333,322 Increase SM–3 Block IIA quantities [115,000] 038 ARROW 3 UPPER TIER SYSTEMS 77,000 77,000 039 SHORT RANGE BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE (SRBMD) 50,000 50,000 040 AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III 39,114 39,114 041 IRON DOME 73,000 73,000 042 AEGIS BMD HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE 104,241 104,241 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA 005 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 4,213 4,213 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY 028 VEHICLES 215 215 029 OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT 9,994 9,994 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY 027 REGIONAL CENTER PROCUREMENT 1,598 1,598 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA 025 AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS 1,319 1,319 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA 002 MAJOR EQUIPMENT 1,398 1,398 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT 024 MAJOR EQUIPMENT 7,993 7,993 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 54A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 554,264 554,264 AVIATION PROGRAMS 055 ARMED OVERWATCH/TARGETING 101,000 53,000 Program decrease [–80,000] U.S. Special Operations Command Armed Overwatch program [32,000] 059 ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT 211,041 211,041 060 UNMANNED ISR 25,488 20,488 Program decrease [–5,000] 061 NON-STANDARD AVIATION 61,874 56,874 Program decrease [–5,000] 062 U–28 3,825 3,825 063 MH–47 CHINOOK 135,482 135,482 064 CV–22 MODIFICATION 14,829 14,829 065 MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE 6,746 6,746 066 PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE 243,111 238,111 Program decrease [–5,000] 067 AC/MC–130J 163,914 163,914 068 C–130 MODIFICATIONS 20,414 20,414 SHIPBUILDING 069 UNDERWATER SYSTEMS 20,556 20,556 AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 070 ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M 186,197 186,197 OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 071 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS 94,982 94,982 072 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 11,645 11,645 073 OTHER ITEMS <$5M 96,333 96,333 074 COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS 17,278 17,278 075 SPECIAL PROGRAMS 78,865 71,365 Program decrease [–7,500] 076 TACTICAL VEHICLES 30,158 30,158 077 WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M 260,733 260,733 078 COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS 19,848 19,848 079 GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES 2,401 2,401 080 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE 13,861 8,861 Program decrease [–5,000] 081 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS 247,038 242,038 Program decrease [–5,000] CBDP 082 CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL SITUATIONAL AWARENESS 147,150 147,150 083 CB PROTECTION & HAZARD MITIGATION 149,944 149,944 TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE 5,324,487 5,384,987 TOTAL PROCUREMENT 130,684,160 132,844,847 4102. Procurement for overseas contingency operations SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS Line Item FY 2021 House AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY ROTARY 009 AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIB NEW BUILD 69,154 64,354 Unjustified costs [–4,800] 014 CH–47 HELICOPTER 50,472 50,472 MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 017 MQ–1 PAYLOAD (MIP) 5,968 5,968 020 MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) 122,520 122,520 025 EMARSS SEMA MODS (MIP) 26,460 26,460 030 DEGRADED VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 1,916 1,916 GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS 037 CMWS 149,162 149,162 038 COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) 32,400 32,400 OTHER SUPPORT 041 AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS 3,028 3,028 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY 461,080 456,280 MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM 002 M-SHORAD—PROCUREMENT 158,300 158,300 003 MSE MISSILE 176,585 176,585 AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 006 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY 236,265 236,265 ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS 011 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) 127,015 127,015 015 LETHAL MINIATURE AERIAL MISSILE SYSTEM (LMAMS 84,993 84,993 MODIFICATIONS 017 ATACMS MODS 78,434 78,434 022 MLRS MODS 20,000 20,000 TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY 881,592 881,592 PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES 016 MULTI-ROLE ANTI-ARMOR ANTI-PERSONNEL WEAPON S 4,765 4,765 018 MORTAR SYSTEMS 10,460 10,460 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY 15,225 15,225 PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 001 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES 567 567 002 CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES 40 40 004 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES 17 17 005 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES 189 189 008 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES 24,900 24,900 ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 016 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982 29,213 29,213 017 ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL 21,675 21,675 ROCKETS 020 SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES 176 176 021 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES 33,880 33,880 MISCELLANEOUS 029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO) 11 11 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY 110,668 110,668 OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY TACTICAL VEHICLES 013 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) 6,500 6,500 014 PLS ESP 15,163 15,163 017 TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS 27,066 27,066 COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 030 TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS 2,700 2,700 032 ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING 12,566 12,566 033 SMART-T (SPACE) 289 289 034 GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS 319 319 COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 045 FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE 1,257 1,257 COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM 048 CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE (MIP) 1,230 1,230 INFORMATION SECURITY 052 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC) 128 128 COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS 058 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 15,277 15,277 062 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM 74,004 74,004 ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 068 DCGS-A (MIP) 47,709 47,709 070 TROJAN (MIP) 1,766 1,766 071 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) 61,450 61,450 073 BIOMETRIC TACTICAL COLLECTION DEVICES (MIP) 12,337 12,337 ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 080 FAMILY OF PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE CAP. (MIP) 44,293 44,293 081 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES 49,100 49,100 ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) 083 SENTINEL MODS 33,496 33,496 084 NIGHT VISION DEVICES 643 643 087 RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS 11 11 088 INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS 37,000 37,000 094 COMPUTER BALLISTICS: LHMBC XM32 280 280 095 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM 13,672 13,672 ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS 100 AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS 15,143 15,143 ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION 109 ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION 4,688 4,688 110 AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP 16,552 16,552 CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT 121 FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) 25,480 25,480 122 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) 98,960 98,960 123 CBRN DEFENSE 18,887 18,887 BRIDGING EQUIPMENT 125 TACTICAL BRIDGING 50,400 50,400 ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT 137 RENDER SAFE SETS KITS OUTFITS 84,000 84,000 COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 140 HEATERS AND ECU'S 370 370 142 PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) 3,721 3,721 145 FORCE PROVIDER 56,400 56,400 146 FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT 2,279 2,279 147 CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM 2,040 2,040 PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT 150 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER 4,374 4,374 MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 151 COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL 6,390 6,390 MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 152 MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS 7,769 7,769 153 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ) 184 184 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 156 LOADERS 3,190 3,190 157 HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR 7,600 7,600 158 TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED 7,450 7,450 160 HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR (HMEE) 3,703 3,703 162 CONST EQUIP ESP 657 657 GENERATORS 167 GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP 106 106 MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT 169 FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS 1,885 1,885 OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 180 RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 8,500 8,500 181 PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) 3,248 3,248 185 BUILDING, PRE-FAB, RELOCATABLE 31,845 31,845 TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY 924,077 924,077 AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY OTHER AIRCRAFT 024 STUASL0 UAV 7,921 7,921 MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 053 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT 3,474 3,474 055 COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM 3,339 3,339 064 QRC 18,507 18,507 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY 33,241 33,241 WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY TACTICAL MISSILES 012 HELLFIRE 5,572 5,572 TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY 5,572 5,572 PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC NAVY AMMUNITION 001 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 8,068 8,068 002 JDAM 15,529 15,529 003 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES 23,000 23,000 004 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION 22,600 22,600 006 CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES 3,927 3,927 007 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES 15,978 15,978 008 JATOS 2,100 2,100 011 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION 2,611 2,611 012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO 1,624 1,624 013 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION 505 505 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC 95,942 95,942 OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY SMALL BOATS 028 STANDARD BOATS 19,104 19,104 OTHER SHIP SUPPORT 035 SMALL & MEDIUM UUV 2,946 2,946 ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 043 FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM 213,000 213,000 SONOBUOYS 092 SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES 26,196 26,196 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 095 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 60,217 60,217 OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 110 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP 2,124 2,124 CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 115 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 177 177 116 GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS 416 416 118 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 801 801 SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 125 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 520 520 TRAINING DEVICES 128 TRAINING AND EDUCATION EQUIPMENT 11,500 11,500 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 130 MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 3,525 3,525 136 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 3,000 3,000 TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY 343,526 343,526 PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS GUIDED MISSILES 012 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) 17,456 17,456 OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) 015 MODIFICATION KITS 4,200 4,200 INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 022 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 10,124 10,124 TACTICAL VEHICLES 038 MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS 16,183 16,183 TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS 47,963 47,963 AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE HELICOPTERS 013 COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER 174,000 174,000 OTHER AIRCRAFT 020 MQ–9 142,490 142,490 021 RQ–20B PUMA 13,770 13,770 STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT 026 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES 57,521 57,521 OTHER AIRCRAFT 046 U–2 MODS 9,600 9,600 055 COMPASS CALL 12,800 12,800 066 HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS 58,020 58,020 069 MQ–9 UAS PAYLOADS 46,100 63,500 WAMI combat loss replacement [17,400] 070 CV–22 MODS 6,290 6,290 AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 071 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS 10,700 10,700 072 MQ–9 12,250 12,250 COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 073 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP 25,614 25,614 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 569,155 586,555 MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE TACTICAL 004 JOINT AIR-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE 30,000 30,000 008 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE 143,420 143,420 009 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB 50,352 50,352 TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 223,772 223,772 PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE ROCKETS 001 ROCKETS 19,489 19,489 CARTRIDGES 002 CARTRIDGES 40,434 40,434 BOMBS 004 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 369,566 369,566 006 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION 237,723 237,723 FLARES 015 FLARES 21,171 21,171 FUZES 016 FUZES 107,855 107,855 SMALL ARMS 017 SMALL ARMS 6,217 6,217 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE 802,455 802,455 OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 001 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 1,302 1,302 CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES 002 MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE 3,400 3,400 004 CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES 12,475 12,475 SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 005 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE 26,150 26,150 007 SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 51,254 51,254 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 008 FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES 24,903 24,903 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 009 MATERIALS HANDLING VEHICLES 14,167 14,167 BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 010 RUNWAY SNOW REMOV AND CLEANING EQU 5,759 5,759 011 BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT VEHICLES 20,653 20,653 SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS 026 GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 5,100 5,100 030 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM 56,496 56,496 ORGANIZATION AND BASE 049 BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE 30,717 30,717 BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 055 ENGINEERING AND EOD EQUIPMENT 13,172 13,172 056 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT 33,694 33,694 057 FUELS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (FSE) 1,777 1,777 058 BASE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 31,620 31,620 SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS 061 DCGS-AF 18,700 18,700 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 065 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 4,000 4,000 TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 355,339 355,339 PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 016 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK 6,120 6,120 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY 030 COUNTER IMPROVISED THREAT TECHNOLOGIES 2,540 2,540 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 54A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 3,500 3,500 AVIATION PROGRAMS 056 MANNED ISR 5,000 45,100 Combat loss replacement—DHC–8 [40,100] 057 MC–12 5,000 5,000 060 UNMANNED ISR 8,207 8,207 AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 070 ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M 105,355 105,355 OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 071 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS 16,234 16,234 073 OTHER ITEMS <$5M 984 984 076 TACTICAL VEHICLES 2,990 2,990 077 WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M 32,573 37,573 Development of autonomous, multi-sensor cUAS capabilities with kinetic effects [5,000] 078 COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS 10,000 10,000 080 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE 6,724 6,724 081 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS 53,264 53,264 TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE 258,491 303,591 NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT ACCOUNT UNDISTRIBUTED 007 UNDISTRIBUTED 150,000 Program increase [150,000] TOTAL NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT ACCOUNT 150,000 TOTAL NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT 150,000 TOTAL PROCUREMENT 5,128,098 5,485,798 XLII Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION Line Program Item FY 2021 House RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY BASIC RESEARCH 002 0601102A DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 303,257 308,257 Counter-UAS Army research lab [5,000] 003 0601103A UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES 67,148 67,148 004 0601104A UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS 87,877 96,877 Automotive research center modeling and simulation [5,000] Biotechnology advancements [4,000] 005 0601121A CYBER COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH ALLIANCE 5,077 5,077 SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH 463,359 477,359 APPLIED RESEARCH 007 0602115A BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY 11,835 11,835 011 0602134A COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT ADVANCED STUDIES 2,000 2,000 012 0602141A LETHALITY TECHNOLOGY 42,425 47,425 Next generation additive manufacturing and 3–D printed electronics [5,000] 013 0602142A ARMY APPLIED RESEARCH 30,757 30,757 014 0602143A SOLDIER LETHALITY TECHNOLOGY 125,435 132,435 HEROES program increase [5,000] Syn-bio enabled functional materials for the soldier [2,000] 015 0602144A GROUND TECHNOLOGY 28,047 45,047 Cold weather military research [2,000] Materials recovery technologies for defense supply resiliency [10,000] Polymeric composites via cold spray additive manufacturing [5,000] 016 0602145A NEXT GENERATION COMBAT VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY 217,565 217,565 017 0602146A NETWORK C3I TECHNOLOGY 114,404 129,404 Alternative positioning navigation and timing [5,000] Multi-drone/multi-sensor intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities [2,000] Program increase [5,000] Sensor and electronic network initatives [3,000] 018 0602147A LONG RANGE PRECISION FIRES TECHNOLOGY 60,553 60,553 019 0602148A FUTURE VERTICLE LIFT TECHNOLOGY 96,484 101,484 High density eVOTL power source research [5,000] 020 0602150A AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY 56,298 76,298 Advanced tracking and targeting capability [5,000] High energy laser technology [5,000] Radar research [5,000] UAS threat detection [5,000] 022 0602213A C3I APPLIED CYBER 18,816 18,816 040 0602785A MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY 20,766 20,766 042 0602787A MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY 95,496 95,496 SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH 920,881 989,881 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 044 0603002A MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 38,896 38,896 049 0603007A MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 11,659 11,659 052 0603115A MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT 27,723 27,723 053 0603117A ARMY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 62,663 62,663 054 0603118A SOLDIER LETHALITY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 109,608 118,608 Advanced AI/AA analytics for modernization and readiness [5,000] Anthropomorphic study for body armor modernization [4,000] 055 0603119A GROUND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 14,795 23,295 Rapid entry and sustainment for the arctic [5,000] Survivability and energy reduction of hard shelters [3,500] 059 0603134A COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT SIMULATION 25,000 25,000 063 0603457A C3I CYBER ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 23,357 23,357 064 0603461A HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 188,024 188,024 065 0603462A NEXT GENERATION COMBAT VEHICLE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 199,358 216,358 Cyber security support for vehicle development [2,000] Fuel cell powered vehicle development [15,000] 066 0603463A NETWORK C3I ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 158,608 163,608 Tactical geospatial information development [5,000] 067 0603464A LONG RANGE PRECISION FIRES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 121,060 131,060 Hypervelocity projectile [10,000] 068 0603465A FUTURE VERTICAL LIFT ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 156,194 156,194 069 0603466A AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 58,130 63,130 Program acceleration [5,000] 077 0603920A HUMANITARIAN DEMINING 8,515 8,515 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 1,203,590 1,258,090 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 078 0603305A ARMY MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 11,062 21,062 Accelerated test and integration [10,000] 079 0603308A ARMY SPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 26,230 26,230 080 0603327A AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 26,482 26,482 081 0603619A LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER—ADV DEV 64,092 66,092 MICLIC replacement development [2,000] 083 0603639A TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION 92,753 92,753 084 0603645A ARMORED SYSTEM MODERNIZATION—ADV DEV 151,478 163,978 Fuel cell powered vehicle development [15,000] Modeling and simulation support for vehicle development [12,500] Program decrease [–15,000] 085 0603747A SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY 5,841 5,841 086 0603766A TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—ADV DEV 194,775 194,775 087 0603774A NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 24,316 24,316 088 0603779A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—DEM/VAL 13,387 13,387 089 0603790A NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 4,762 4,762 090 0603801A AVIATION—ADV DEV 647,937 647,937 091 0603804A LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV 4,761 4,761 092 0603807A MEDICAL SYSTEMS—ADV DEV 28,520 28,520 093 0603827A SOLDIER SYSTEMS—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 26,138 23,138 IHPS program delays [–3,000] 094 0604017A ROBOTICS DEVELOPMENT 121,207 115,407 Program reduction [–5,800] 096 0604021A ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY MATURATION (MIP) 22,840 22,840 097 0604035A LOW EARTH ORBIT (LEO) SATELLITE CAPABILITY 22,678 22,678 098 0604100A ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 10,082 10,082 099 0604101A SMALL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (SUAV) (6.4) 1,378 1,378 100 0604113A FUTURE TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (FTUAS) 40,083 40,083 101 0604114A LOWER TIER AIR MISSILE DEFENSE (LTAMD) SENSOR 376,373 376,373 102 0604115A TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES 156,834 156,834 103 0604117A MANEUVER—SHORT RANGE AIR DEFENSE (M-SHORAD) 4,995 4,995 105 0604119A ARMY ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPING 170,490 170,490 106 0604120A ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING (PNT) 128,125 128,125 107 0604121A SYNTHETIC TRAINING ENVIRONMENT REFINEMENT & PROTOTYPING 129,547 129,547 108 0604134A COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT DEMONSTRATION, PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT, AND TESTING 13,831 13,831 109 0604182A HYPERSONICS 801,417 811,417 Program increase [10,000] 111 0604403A FUTURE INTERCEPTOR 7,992 7,992 112 0604541A UNIFIED NETWORK TRANSPORT 40,677 40,677 115 0305251A CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS FORCES AND FORCE SUPPORT 50,525 50,525 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 3,421,608 3,447,308 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 118 0604201A AIRCRAFT AVIONICS 2,764 2,764 119 0604270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 62,426 62,426 121 0604601A INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS 91,574 98,574 Advanced gunner protection kit development [2,000] Soldier Enhancement Program [5,000] 122 0604604A MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES 8,523 8,523 123 0604611A JAVELIN 7,493 7,493 124 0604622A FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES 24,792 24,792 125 0604633A AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 3,511 3,511 126 0604642A LIGHT TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLES 1,976 1,976 127 0604645A ARMORED SYSTEMS MODERNIZATION (ASM)—ENG DEV 135,488 135,488 128 0604710A NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS—ENG DEV 61,445 61,445 129 0604713A COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT 2,814 2,814 130 0604715A NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—ENG DEV 28,036 28,036 131 0604741A AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—ENG DEV 43,651 39,651 Army identified funds excess to need [–4,000] 132 0604742A CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 10,150 10,150 133 0604746A AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT 5,578 5,578 134 0604760A DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)—ENG DEV 7,892 7,892 135 0604768A BRILLIANT ANTI-ARMOR SUBMUNITION (BAT) 24,975 24,975 136 0604780A COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE 3,568 3,568 137 0604798A BRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION 19,268 19,268 138 0604802A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS—ENG DEV 265,811 265,811 139 0604804A LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV 49,694 49,694 140 0604805A COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV 11,079 11,079 141 0604807A MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV 49,870 49,870 142 0604808A LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER—ENG DEV 9,589 9,589 143 0604818A ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE 162,513 152,513 Command post integrated infrastructure contract delay [–10,000] 144 0604820A RADAR DEVELOPMENT 109,259 109,259 145 0604822A GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM (GFEBS) 21,201 21,201 146 0604823A FIREFINDER 20,008 16,808 Prior year carry-over [–3,200] 147 0604827A SOLDIER SYSTEMS—WARRIOR DEM/VAL 6,534 6,534 148 0604852A SUITE OF SURVIVABILITY ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS—EMD 82,459 109,380 Prior year carry-over [–5,079] Program increase for vehicle protection systems [32,000] 149 0604854A ARTILLERY SYSTEMS—EMD 11,611 11,611 150 0605013A INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 142,678 137,678 Reprioritization [–5,000] 151 0605018A INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPPS-A) 115,286 115,286 152 0605028A ARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV) 96,594 76,594 Army identified funds excess to need [–20,000] 154 0605030A JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC) 16,264 16,264 155 0605031A JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK (JTN) 31,696 31,696 157 0605033A GROUND-BASED OPERATIONAL SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—EXPEDITIONARY (GBOSS-E) 5,976 5,976 159 0605035A COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) 23,321 28,321 AI virtual training environments [5,000] 161 0605038A NUCLEAR BIOLOGICAL CHEMICAL RECONNAISSANCE VEHICLE (NBCRV) SENSOR SUITE 4,846 4,846 162 0605041A DEFENSIVE CYBER TOOL DEVELOPMENT 28,544 28,544 163 0605042A TACTICAL NETWORK RADIO SYSTEMS (LOW-TIER) 28,178 28,178 164 0605047A CONTRACT WRITING SYSTEM 22,860 22,860 166 0605051A AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY DEVELOPMENT 35,893 35,893 167 0605052A INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INC 2—BLOCK 1 235,770 187,970 Army identified funds excess to need [–47,800] 168 0605053A GROUND ROBOTICS 13,710 13,710 169 0605054A EMERGING TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVES 294,739 284,739 Program decrease [–10,000] 170 0605145A MEDICAL PRODUCTS AND SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 954 954 171 0605203A ARMY SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 150,201 150,201 172 0605205A SMALL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (SUAV) (6.5) 5,999 5,999 174 0605450A JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) 8,891 8,891 175 0605457A ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) 193,929 193,929 176 0605625A MANNED GROUND VEHICLE 327,732 244,732 Army identified funds excess to need [–83,000] 177 0605766A NATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION (MIP) 7,670 7,670 178 0605812A JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH 1,742 1,742 179 0605830A AVIATION GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 1,467 4,467 Aircraft cleaning and deicing system development [3,000] 180 0303032A TROJAN—RH12 3,451 3,451 183 0304270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 55,855 55,855 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 3,199,798 3,058,719 MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 185 0604256A THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT 14,515 14,515 186 0604258A TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 10,668 10,668 187 0604759A MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT 106,270 111,270 Program increase [5,000] 188 0605103A RAND ARROYO CENTER 13,481 13,481 189 0605301A ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL 231,824 231,824 190 0605326A CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM 54,898 54,898 192 0605601A ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES 350,359 350,359 193 0605602A ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS 48,475 62,975 Aviation component testing [5,000] Testing additive manufacturing technology [9,500] 194 0605604A SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS 36,001 36,001 195 0605606A AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION 2,736 2,736 196 0605702A METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES 6,488 6,488 197 0605706A MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS 21,859 21,859 198 0605709A EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS 7,936 7,936 199 0605712A SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING 54,470 54,470 200 0605716A ARMY EVALUATION CENTER 63,141 63,141 201 0605718A ARMY MODELING & SIM X-CMD COLLABORATION & INTEG 2,572 2,572 202 0605801A PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES 87,472 87,472 203 0605803A TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES 26,244 26,244 204 0605805A MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY 40,133 50,133 Development of polymer-cased ammunition [5,000] Program acceleration [5,000] 205 0605857A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT 1,780 1,780 206 0605898A ARMY DIRECT REPORT HEADQUARTERS—R&D - MHA 55,045 55,045 208 0606002A RONALD REAGAN BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST SITE 71,306 71,306 209 0606003A COUNTERINTEL AND HUMAN INTEL MODERNIZATION 1,063 1,063 210 0606105A MEDICAL PROGRAM-WIDE ACTIVITIES 19,891 19,891 211 0606942A ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS CYBER VULNERABILITIES 4,496 4,496 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1,333,123 1,362,623 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 214 0603778A MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 10,157 10,157 216 0605024A ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 8,682 8,682 217 0607131A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 20,409 20,409 219 0607134A LONG RANGE PRECISION FIRES (LRPF) 122,733 56,633 Program reduction [–66,100] 221 0607136A BLACKHAWK PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 11,236 16,236 Thermoplastic drive shafts [5,000] 222 0607137A CHINOOK PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 46,091 51,091 Carbon composite materials for wheels and brakes [5,000] 224 0607139A IMPROVED TURBINE ENGINE PROGRAM 249,257 249,257 225 0607142A AVIATION ROCKET SYSTEM PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT 17,155 17,155 226 0607143A UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM UNIVERSAL PRODUCTS 7,743 7,743 227 0607145A APACHE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT 77,177 77,177 228 0607150A INTEL CYBER DEVELOPMENT 14,652 14,652 229 0607312A ARMY OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 35,851 35,851 230 0607665A FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS 1,324 1,324 231 0607865A PATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT 187,840 187,840 232 0203728A JOINT AUTOMATED DEEP OPERATION COORDINATION SYSTEM (JADOCS) 44,691 44,691 233 0203735A COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 268,919 263,252 CROWS-J program delay [–5,667] 234 0203743A 155MM SELF-PROPELLED HOWITZER IMPROVEMENTS 427,254 290,963 Prior year carry-over [–6,291] Program decrease [–130,000] 235 0203744A AIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 11,688 7,688 Early to need [–4,000] 236 0203752A AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 80 80 237 0203758A DIGITIZATION 4,516 4,516 238 0203801A MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1,288 1,288 239 0203802A OTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 79,424 19,424 Program decrease [–60,000] 243 0205412A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEV 259 259 244 0205456A LOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AMD) SYSTEM 166 166 245 0205778A GUIDED MULTIPLE-LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (GMLRS) 75,575 75,575 246 0208053A JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM 9,510 9,510 249 0303140A INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 29,270 29,270 250 0303141A GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM 86,908 86,908 251 0303142A SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE) 18,684 18,684 256 0305179A INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS) 467 467 257 0305204A TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES 4,051 4,051 258 0305206A AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS 13,283 13,283 259 0305208A DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 47,204 47,204 264 0708045A END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES 61,012 67,012 6.8mm projectile development [4,000] Lightweight film armor development [2,000] 266A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 3,983 3,983 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 1,998,539 1,742,481 SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS 267 0608041A DEFENSIVE CYBER—SOFTWARE PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT 46,445 46,445 SUBTOTAL SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS 46,445 46,445 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY 12,587,343 12,382,906 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY BASIC RESEARCH 001 0601103N UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES 116,816 121,816 Navy Defense University Research Instrumentation program increase [5,000] 002 0601152N IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH 19,113 19,113 003 0601153N DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 467,158 467,158 SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH 603,087 608,087 APPLIED RESEARCH 004 0602114N POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH 17,792 17,792 005 0602123N FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH 122,281 147,281 Additive manufacturing of unmanned maritime systems [5,000] Cyber physical security and resiliency research [5,000] Expeditionary unmanned systems launch and recovery [5,000] Talent and technology for power and energy systems [5,000] Unmanned logistics technology [5,000] 006 0602131M MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY 50,623 50,623 007 0602235N COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH 48,001 48,001 008 0602236N WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH 67,765 77,765 High mobility ground robots [5,000] Robotics in complex unstructured environments [5,000] 009 0602271N ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH 84,994 84,994 010 0602435N OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH 63,392 73,392 Extreme weather events research [5,000] Program increase [5,000] 011 0602651M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH 6,343 6,343 012 0602747N UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH 56,397 91,397 Academic partnerships for undersea vehicle research [10,000] Autonomous undersea robotics [10,000] Cross-domain autonomy for persistent maritime operations [10,000] Expandable structures for operational effectiveness research [5,000] 013 0602750N FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH 167,590 167,590 014 0602782N MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH 30,715 30,715 015 0602792N INNOVATIVE NAVAL PROTOTYPES (INP) APPLIED RESEARCH 160,537 160,537 016 0602861N SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT—ONR FIELD ACITIVITIES 76,745 76,745 SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH 953,175 1,033,175 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 017 0603123N FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 24,410 29,410 Additive manufacturing [5,000] 018 0603271N ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 8,008 8,008 019 0603640M USMC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION (ATD) 219,045 249,045 Expeditionary autonomous logistics [5,000] Heavy payload solar powered UAS [20,000] Modular Advanced Armed Robotic System [5,000] 020 0603651M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 13,301 13,301 021 0603673N FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 246,054 246,054 022 0603680N MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 60,122 60,122 023 0603729N WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 4,851 4,851 024 0603758N NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS 40,709 40,709 025 0603782N MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 1,948 1,948 026 0603801N INNOVATIVE NAVAL PROTOTYPES (INP) ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 141,948 161,948 Accelerated railgun technology maturation [20,000] SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 760,396 815,396 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 027 0603178N MEDIUM AND LARGE UNMANNED SURFACE VEHICLES (USVS) 464,042 270,442 EPF conversion to LUSV prototype [45,000] Two additional Overlord vessels excess to need [–238,600] 028 0603207N AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS 35,386 35,386 029 0603216N AVIATION SURVIVABILITY 13,428 13,428 030 0603239N ISO NAVAL CONSTRUCTION FORCES 2,350 2,350 031 0603251N AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS 418 418 032 0603254N ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 15,719 15,719 033 0603261N TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE 3,411 3,411 034 0603382N ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY 70,218 70,218 035 0603502N SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES 52,358 52,358 036 0603506N SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE 12,816 12,816 037 0603512N CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 7,559 7,559 038 0603525N PILOT FISH 358,757 278,557 Excess cost growth [–25,000] Program adjustment [–55,200] 039 0603527N RETRACT LARCH 12,562 12,562 040 0603536N RETRACT JUNIPER 148,000 148,000 041 0603542N RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL 778 778 042 0603553N SURFACE ASW 1,161 1,161 043 0603561N ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 185,356 90,356 Excessive accelerated development [–28,200] Project 1 insufficient budget justification [–66,800] 044 0603562N SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS 10,528 10,528 045 0603563N SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN 126,396 136,396 Expeditionary sustainment and repair-related technologies [5,000] Polymorphic build farm for open source technologies [5,000] 046 0603564N SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES 70,270 70,270 047 0603570N ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS 149,188 149,188 048 0603573N ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS 38,449 38,449 049 0603576N CHALK EAGLE 71,181 71,181 050 0603581N LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS) 32,178 32,178 051 0603582N COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION 17,843 17,843 052 0603595N OHIO REPLACEMENT 317,196 317,196 053 0603596N LCS MISSION MODULES 67,875 67,875 054 0603597N AUTOMATED TEST AND ANALYSIS 4,797 4,797 055 0603599N FRIGATE DEVELOPMENT 82,309 82,309 056 0603609N CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS 9,922 9,922 057 0603635M MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM 189,603 182,603 Program delay [–7,000] 058 0603654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT 43,084 43,084 059 0603713N OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 6,346 6,346 060 0603721N ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 20,601 20,601 061 0603724N NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM 23,422 23,422 062 0603725N FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT 4,664 4,664 063 0603734N CHALK CORAL 545,763 520,763 Excess cost growth [–25,000] 064 0603739N NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY 3,884 3,884 065 0603746N RETRACT MAPLE 353,226 353,226 066 0603748N LINK PLUMERIA 544,388 519,388 Excess cost growth [–25,000] 067 0603751N RETRACT ELM 86,730 86,730 068 0603764M LINK EVERGREEN 236,234 236,234 070 0603790N NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 6,880 6,880 071 0603795N LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY 10,578 10,578 072 0603851M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TESTING 28,435 28,435 073 0603860N JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS—DEM/VAL 33,612 33,612 074 0603925N DIRECTED ENERGY AND ELECTRIC WEAPON SYSTEMS 128,845 216,845 One additional system [88,000] 075 0604014N F/A –18 INFRARED SEARCH AND TRACK (IRST) 84,190 84,190 076 0604027N DIGITAL WARFARE OFFICE 54,699 54,699 077 0604028N SMALL AND MEDIUM UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLES 53,942 53,942 078 0604029N UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLE CORE TECHNOLOGIES 40,060 40,060 079 0604030N RAPID PROTOTYPING, EXPERIMENTATION AND DEMONSTRATION. 12,100 12,100 080 0604031N LARGE UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLES 78,122 42,122 Early to need, phase 1 results needed first [–36,000] 081 0604112N GERALD R. FORD CLASS NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIER (CVN 78—80) 107,895 107,895 082 0604126N LITTORAL AIRBORNE MCM 17,366 17,366 083 0604127N SURFACE MINE COUNTERMEASURES 18,754 18,754 084 0604272N TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (TADIRCM) 59,776 59,776 086 0604292N FUTURE VERTICAL LIFT (MARITIME STRIKE) 5,097 5,097 087 0604320M RAPID TECHNOLOGY CAPABILITY PROTOTYPE 3,664 3,664 088 0604454N LX (R) 10,203 10,203 089 0604536N ADVANCED UNDERSEA PROTOTYPING 115,858 105,858 XLUUV late test and evaluation award [–10,000] 090 0604636N COUNTER UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (C-UAS) 14,259 14,259 091 0604659N PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 1,102,387 1,087,387 Transition to DDG–1000—initial integration [–15,000] 092 0604707N SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING SUPPORT 7,657 7,657 093 0604786N OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT 35,750 35,750 094 0303354N ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT—MIP 9,151 9,151 095 0304240M ADVANCED TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM 22,589 6,989 K-MAX [7,000] MUX uncertain acquisition strategy [–22,600] 097 0304270N ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT—MIP 809 809 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 6,503,074 6,098,674 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 098 0603208N TRAINING SYSTEM AIRCRAFT 4,332 4,332 099 0604212N OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT 18,133 18,133 100 0604214M AV–8B AIRCRAFT—ENG DEV 20,054 20,054 101 0604215N STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT 4,237 4,237 102 0604216N MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT 27,340 27,340 104 0604221N P–3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 606 606 105 0604230N WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM 9,065 9,065 106 0604231N TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM 97,968 97,968 107 0604234N ADVANCED HAWKEYE 309,373 309,373 108 0604245M H–1 UPGRADES 62,310 62,310 109 0604261N ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS 47,182 47,182 110 0604262N V–22A 132,624 132,624 111 0604264N AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 21,445 21,445 112 0604269N EA–18 106,134 106,134 113 0604270N ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 134,194 134,194 114 0604273M EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT 99,321 99,321 115 0604274N NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) 477,680 487,680 High band risk reduction [10,000] 116 0604280N JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM—NAVY (JTRS-NAVY) 232,818 232,818 117 0604282N NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) INCREMENT II 170,039 170,039 118 0604307N SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING 403,712 403,712 119 0604311N LPD–17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 945 945 120 0604329N SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) 62,488 62,488 121 0604366N STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS 386,225 359,225 SM–6 excessive cost growth; program accountability [–27,000] 122 0604373N AIRBORNE MCM 10,909 10,909 123 0604378N NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL—COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 44,548 44,548 124 0604419N ADVANCED SENSORS APPLICATION PROGRAM (ASAP) 13,673 13,673 125 0604501N ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS 87,809 87,809 126 0604503N SSN–688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION 93,097 111,097 Submarine electronic warfare capability improvement [18,000] 127 0604504N AIR CONTROL 38,863 38,863 128 0604512N SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS 9,593 9,593 129 0604518N COMBAT INFORMATION CENTER CONVERSION 12,718 12,718 130 0604522N AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR (AMDR) SYSTEM 78,319 78,319 131 0604530N ADVANCED ARRESTING GEAR (AAG) 65,834 65,834 132 0604558N NEW DESIGN SSN 259,443 282,943 Accelerate design [23,500] 133 0604562N SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM 63,878 63,878 134 0604567N SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/ LIVE FIRE T&E 51,853 66,453 Advanced Degaussing System [14,600] 135 0604574N NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES 3,853 3,853 136 0604601N MINE DEVELOPMENT 92,607 65,107 Forward funded in FY20 [–27,500] 137 0604610N LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT 146,012 146,012 138 0604654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT 8,383 8,383 139 0604657M USMC GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV 33,784 33,784 140 0604703N PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS 8,599 8,599 141 0604727N JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS 73,744 73,744 142 0604755N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) 157,490 157,490 143 0604756N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL) 121,761 121,761 144 0604757N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW) 89,373 89,373 145 0604761N INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING 15,716 15,716 146 0604771N MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT 2,120 22,120 Autonomous aerial distributed logistics [10,000] ETEC disease research [10,000] 147 0604777N NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM 50,180 50,180 148 0604800M JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD 561 561 149 0604800N JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD 250 250 150 0604850N SSN(X) 1,000 1,000 151 0605013M INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 974 974 152 0605013N INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 356,173 351,173 Unjustified growth [–5,000] 153 0605024N ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 7,810 7,810 154 0605212M CH–53K RDTE 406,406 406,406 155 0605215N MISSION PLANNING 86,134 86,134 156 0605217N COMMON AVIONICS 54,540 54,540 157 0605220N SHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR (SSC) 5,155 5,155 158 0605327N T-AO 205 CLASS 5,148 5,148 159 0605414N UNMANNED CARRIER AVIATION (UCA) 266,970 266,970 160 0605450M JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) 12,713 12,713 161 0605500N MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA) 24,424 24,424 162 0605504N MULTI-MISSION MARITIME (MMA) INCREMENT III 182,870 182,870 163 0605611M MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 41,775 41,775 164 0605813M JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 2,541 2,541 165 0204202N DDG–1000 208,448 223,448 Transfer from CPS—initial integration [15,000] 169 0304785N TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS 111,434 111,434 170 0306250M CYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 26,173 26,173 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 6,263,883 6,305,483 MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 171 0604256N THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT 22,075 22,075 172 0604258N TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 10,224 10,224 173 0604759N MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT 85,195 85,195 175 0605152N STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—NAVY 3,089 3,089 176 0605154N CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES 43,517 43,517 179 0605804N TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES 932 932 180 0605853N MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT 94,297 94,297 181 0605856N STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT 3,813 3,813 183 0605863N RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT 104,822 104,822 184 0605864N TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT 446,960 446,960 185 0605865N OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY 27,241 27,241 186 0605866N NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) SUPPORT 15,787 15,787 187 0605867N SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT 8,559 8,559 188 0605873M MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT 42,749 42,749 189 0605898N MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D 41,094 41,094 190 0606355N WARFARE INNOVATION MANAGEMENT 37,022 37,022 193 0305327N INSIDER THREAT 2,310 2,310 194 0902498N MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (DEPARTMENTAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES) 1,536 1,536 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 991,222 991,222 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 199 0604227N HARPOON MODIFICATIONS 697 697 200 0604840M F–35 C2D2 379,549 341,649 Block IV/TR3 upgrade delays [–37,900] 201 0604840N F–35 C2D2 413,875 372,475 Block IV/TR3 upgrade delays [–41,400] 202 0607658N COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY (CEC) 143,667 143,667 204 0101221N STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT 173,056 173,056 205 0101224N SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 45,970 45,970 206 0101226N SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 69,190 74,190 Next-generation countermeasure acoustic device [5,000] 207 0101402N NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS 42,277 42,277 208 0204136N F/A–18 SQUADRONS 171,030 175,030 Jet noise reduction [4,000] 210 0204228N SURFACE SUPPORT 33,482 33,482 211 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER (TMPC) 200,308 200,308 212 0204311N INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM 102,975 102,975 213 0204313N SHIP-TOWED ARRAY SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS 10,873 10,873 214 0204413N AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS (DISPLACEMENT CRAFT) 1,713 1,713 215 0204460M GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR) 22,205 22,205 216 0204571N CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 83,956 83,956 218 0204575N ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT 56,791 56,791 219 0205601N HARM IMPROVEMENT 146,166 146,166 221 0205620N SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION 29,348 29,348 222 0205632N MK–48 ADCAP 110,349 110,349 223 0205633N AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS 133,953 133,953 224 0205675N OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS 110,313 110,313 225 0206313M MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 207,662 207,662 226 0206335M COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (CAC2S) 4,406 4,406 227 0206623M MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS 61,381 61,381 228 0206624M MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT 10,421 10,421 229 0206625M USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP) 29,977 29,977 230 0206629M AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT VEHICLE 6,469 6,469 231 0207161N TACTICAL AIM MISSILES 5,859 5,859 232 0207163N ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) 44,323 44,323 236 0303109N SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) 41,978 46,978 Interference mitigation technology, test and verification [5,000] 237 0303138N CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES (CANES) 29,684 29,684 238 0303140N INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 39,094 39,094 239 0305192N MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (MIP) ACTIVITIES 6,154 6,154 240 0305204N TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES 7,108 7,108 241 0305205N UAS INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY 62,098 62,098 242 0305208M DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 21,500 21,500 244 0305220N MQ–4C TRITON 11,120 11,120 245 0305231N MQ–8 UAV 28,968 28,968 246 0305232M RQ–11 UAV 537 537 247 0305234N SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0) 8,773 8,773 248 0305239M RQ–21A 10,853 10,853 249 0305241N MULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT 60,413 60,413 250 0305242M UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS) PAYLOADS (MIP) 5,000 5,000 251 0305251N CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS FORCES AND FORCE SUPPORT 34,967 34,967 252 0305421N RQ–4 MODERNIZATION 178,799 178,799 253 0307577N INTELLIGENCE MISSION DATA (IMD) 2,120 2,120 254 0308601N MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT 8,683 8,683 255 0702207N DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) 45,168 45,168 256 0708730N MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH) 6,697 6,697 257 1203109N SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) 70,056 70,056 257A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 1,795,032 1,795,032 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 5,327,043 5,261,743 SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS 258 0608013N RISK MANAGEMENT INFORMATION—SOFTWARE PILOT PROGRAM 14,300 14,300 259 0608231N MARITIME TACTICAL COMMAND AND CONTROL (MTC2)—SOFTWARE PILOT PROGRAM 10,868 10,868 SUBTOTAL SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS 25,168 25,168 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY 21,427,048 21,138,948 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF BASIC RESEARCH 001 0601102F DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 315,348 315,348 002 0601103F UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES 161,861 166,861 Solar block research [5,000] 003 0601108F HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES 15,085 15,085 SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH 492,294 497,294 APPLIED RESEARCH 004 0602020F FUTURE AF CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH 100,000 100,000 005 0602102F MATERIALS 140,781 165,781 Advanced materials manufacturing flexible biosensors [5,000] Metals affordability research [15,000] Thermal protection systems [5,000] 006 0602201F AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES 349,225 374,225 Advanced batteries for directed energy [5,000] High speed expendable turbine development [5,000] On-orbit propulsion technologies [5,000] Secure unmanned aerial vehicles [10,000] 007 0602202F HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH 115,222 115,222 009 0602204F AEROSPACE SENSORS 211,301 211,301 011 0602298F SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT— MAJOR HEADQUARTERS ACTIVITIES 8,926 8,926 012 0602602F CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS 132,425 132,425 013 0602605F DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY 128,113 128,113 014 0602788F DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS 178,668 208,668 Counter UAS platform integration testbed [5,000] Quantum Innovation Center [5,000] Quantum network testbed [10,000] Trusted UAS traffic management and C-UAS testbed [10,000] 015 0602890F HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH 45,088 45,088 SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH 1,409,749 1,489,749 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 017 0603030F AF FOUNDATIONAL DEVELOPMENT/DEMOS 103,280 110,280 Agile composite manufacturing initiatives [5,000] Foam engine wash [2,000] 018 0603032F FUTURE AF INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY DEMOS 157,619 127,619 Inappropriate use of S&T funds for Golden Horde demonstration & validation [–30,000] 019 0603033F NEXT GEN PLATFORM DEV/DEMO 199,556 199,556 020 0603034F PERSISTENT KNOWLEDGE, AWARENESS, & C2 TECH 102,276 102,276 021 0603035F NEXT GEN EFFECTS DEV/DEMOS 215,817 215,817 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 778,548 755,548 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 038 0603260F INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 4,320 4,320 039 0603742F COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY 26,396 26,396 040 0603790F NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 3,647 3,647 041 0603851F INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—DEM/VAL 32,959 32,959 043 0604002F AIR FORCE WEATHER SERVICES RESEARCH 869 869 044 0604003F ADVANCED BATTLE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ABMS) 302,323 216,823 Unjustified costs [–85,500] 045 0604004F ADVANCED ENGINE DEVELOPMENT 636,495 636,495 046 0604015F LONG RANGE STRIKE—BOMBER 2,848,410 2,828,410 Transfer to APA line 025A [–20,000] 047 0604032F DIRECTED ENERGY PROTOTYPING 20,964 20,964 048 0604033F HYPERSONICS PROTOTYPING 381,862 381,862 050 0604257F ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AND SENSORS 24,747 24,747 051 0604288F NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPS CENTER (NAOC) RECAP 76,417 76,417 052 0604317F TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 3,011 3,011 053 0604327F HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT SYSTEM (HDBTDS) PROGRAM 52,921 52,921 054 0604414F CYBER RESILIENCY OF WEAPON SYSTEMS-ACS 69,783 69,783 055 0604776F DEPLOYMENT & DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE R&D 25,835 25,835 056 0604858F TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM 219,252 249,252 Program increase—LCAAT prototyping [30,000] 057 0605230F GROUND BASED STRATEGIC DETERRENT 1,524,759 1,524,759 059 0207110F NEXT GENERATION AIR DOMINANCE 1,044,089 1,044,089 060 0207455F THREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR (3DELRR) 19,356 19,356 061 0207522F AIRBASE AIR DEFENSE SYSTEMS (ABADS) 8,737 8,737 062 0208099F UNIFIED PLATFORM (UP) 5,990 5,990 063 0305236F COMMON DATA LINK EXECUTIVE AGENT (CDL EA) 39,293 39,293 065 0305601F MISSION PARTNER ENVIRONMENTS 11,430 11,430 066 0306250F CYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 259,823 259,823 067 0306415F ENABLED CYBER ACTIVITIES 10,560 10,560 068 0401310F C–32 EXECUTIVE TRANSPORT RECAPITALIZATION 9,908 9,908 069 0901410F CONTRACTING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM 8,662 8,662 074 1206427F SPACE SYSTEMS PROTOTYPE TRANSITIONS (SSPT) 8,787 8,787 077 1206730F SPACE SECURITY AND DEFENSE PROGRAM 56,311 56,311 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 7,737,916 7,662,416 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 082 0604200F FUTURE ADVANCED WEAPON ANALYSIS & PROGRAMS 25,161 25,161 083 0604201F PNT RESILIENCY, MODS, AND IMPROVEMENTS 38,564 38,564 084 0604222F NUCLEAR WEAPONS SUPPORT 35,033 35,033 085 0604270F ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 2,098 2,098 086 0604281F TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE 131,909 131,909 087 0604287F PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 6,752 6,752 088 0604329F SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)—EMD 17,280 17,280 090 0604602F ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT 23,076 23,076 091 0604604F SUBMUNITIONS 3,091 3,091 092 0604617F AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT 20,609 20,609 093 0604618F JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION 7,926 7,926 094 0604706F LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS 23,660 23,660 095 0604735F COMBAT TRAINING RANGES 8,898 8,898 096 0604800F F–35—EMD 5,423 423 Excess SDD funding [–5,000] 097 0604932F LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON 474,430 474,430 098 0604933F ICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION 167,099 167,099 100 0605056F OPEN ARCHITECTURE MANAGEMENT 30,547 30,547 102 0605223F ADVANCED PILOT TRAINING 248,669 248,669 103 0605229F COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER 63,169 63,169 105 0101125F NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION 9,683 9,683 106 0207171F F–15 EPAWSS 170,679 155,979 Cost growth [–14,700] 107 0207328F STAND IN ATTACK WEAPON 160,438 142,738 Unjustified cost increase [–17,700] 108 0207701F FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING 9,422 9,422 110 0305176F COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATOR 973 973 111 0401221F KC–46A TANKER SQUADRONS 106,262 86,262 Slow execution [–20,000] 113 0401319F VC–25B 800,889 800,889 114 0701212F AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEMS 10,673 10,673 115 0804772F TRAINING DEVELOPMENTS 4,479 4,479 116 0901299F AF A1 SYSTEMS 8,467 8,467 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 2,615,359 2,557,959 MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 131 0604256F THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT 57,725 57,725 132 0604759F MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT 208,680 208,680 133 0605101F RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE 35,803 35,803 135 0605712F INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION 13,557 13,557 136 0605807F TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT 764,606 754,606 Program decrease [–10,000] 142 0605831F ACQ WORKFORCE- CAPABILITY INTEGRATION 1,362,038 1,362,038 143 0605832F ACQ WORKFORCE- ADVANCED PRGM TECHNOLOGY 40,768 40,768 144 0605833F ACQ WORKFORCE- NUCLEAR SYSTEMS 179,646 179,646 145 0605898F MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D 5,734 5,734 146 0605976F FACILITIES RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT 70,985 70,985 147 0605978F FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT 29,880 29,880 148 0606017F REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION 63,381 63,381 149 0606398F MANAGEMENT HQ—T&E 5,785 5,785 150 0303255F COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATION, AND COMPUTERS (C4)—STRATCOM 24,564 24,564 151 0308602F ENTEPRISE INFORMATION SERVICES (EIS) 9,883 9,883 152 0702806F ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 13,384 13,384 153 0804731F GENERAL SKILL TRAINING 1,262 1,262 155 1001004F INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES 3,599 3,599 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 2,891,280 2,881,280 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 163 0604233F SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING 8,777 8,777 164 0604776F DEPLOYMENT & DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE R&D 499 499 165 0604840F F–35 C2D2 785,336 706,836 Block IV/TR3 upgrade delays [–78,500] 166 0605018F AF INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM (AF-IPPS) 27,035 27,035 167 0605024F ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY 50,508 50,508 168 0605117F FOREIGN MATERIEL ACQUISITION AND EXPLOITATION 71,229 71,229 169 0605278F HC/MC–130 RECAP RDT&E 24,705 24,705 170 0606018F NC3 INTEGRATION 26,356 26,356 172 0101113F B–52 SQUADRONS 520,023 338,523 GPS-IU contract delays [–10,000] No acquisition strategy for AEHF [–2,500] Radar modernization program contract delays [–40,000] Virtual prototype contract delay [–125,000] VLF/LF contract delays [–4,000] 173 0101122F AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) 1,433 1,433 174 0101126F B–1B SQUADRONS 15,766 15,766 175 0101127F B–2 SQUADRONS 187,399 187,399 Airspace compliance contract delays [–2,000] JASSM-ER Milestone B delay [–5,000] Virtual training [7,000] 176 0101213F MINUTEMAN SQUADRONS 116,569 116,569 177 0101316F WORLDWIDE JOINT STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS 27,235 27,235 178 0101324F INTEGRATED STRATEGIC PLANNING & ANALYSIS NETWORK 24,227 24,227 179 0101328F ICBM REENTRY VEHICLES 112,753 112,753 181 0102110F UH–1N REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 44,464 44,464 182 0102326F REGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL CENTER MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 5,929 5,929 183 0102412F NORTH WARNING SYSTEM (NWS) 100 100 184 0205219F MQ–9 UAV 162,080 162,080 186 0207131F A–10 SQUADRONS 24,535 24,535 187 0207133F F–16 SQUADRONS 223,437 223,437 188 0207134F F–15E SQUADRONS 298,908 298,908 189 0207136F MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION 14,960 14,960 190 0207138F F–22A SQUADRONS 665,038 648,938 Software delays [–16,100] 191 0207142F F–35 SQUADRONS 132,229 129,629 Unjustified USAF ALIS unique funding [–2,600] 192 0207146F F–15EX 159,761 159,761 193 0207161F TACTICAL AIM MISSILES 19,417 19,417 194 0207163F ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) 51,799 51,799 195 0207227F COMBAT RESCUE—PARARESCUE 669 669 196 0207247F AF TENCAP 21,644 21,644 197 0207249F PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT 9,261 9,261 198 0207253F COMPASS CALL 15,854 15,854 199 0207268F AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 95,896 95,896 200 0207325F JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE (JASSM) 70,792 70,792 201 0207410F AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) 51,187 51,187 202 0207412F CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC) 16,041 16,041 203 0207417F AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (AWACS) 138,303 138,303 204 0207418F AFSPECWAR—TACP 4,223 4,223 206 0207431F COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES 16,564 16,564 207 0207438F THEATER BATTLE MANAGEMENT (TBM) C4I 7,858 7,858 208 0207444F TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY-MOD 12,906 12,906 210 0207452F DCAPES 14,816 14,816 211 0207521F AIR FORCE CALIBRATION PROGRAMS 1,970 1,970 212 0207573F NATIONAL TECHNICAL NUCLEAR FORENSICS 396 396 213 0207590F SEEK EAGLE 29,680 29,680 214 0207601F USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION 17,666 17,666 215 0207605F WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS 6,353 6,353 216 0207610F BATTLEFIELD ABN COMM NODE (BACN) 6,827 6,827 217 0207697F DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES 3,390 3,390 218 0208006F MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS 91,768 91,768 219 0208007F TACTICAL DECEPTION 2,370 2,370 220 0208064F OPERATIONAL HQ—CYBER 5,527 5,527 221 0208087F DISTRIBUTED CYBER WARFARE OPERATIONS 68,279 68,279 222 0208088F AF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 15,165 15,165 223 0208097F JOINT CYBER COMMAND AND CONTROL (JCC2) 38,480 38,480 224 0208099F UNIFIED PLATFORM (UP) 84,645 84,645 230 0301025F GEOBASE 2,767 2,767 231 0301112F NUCLEAR PLANNING AND EXECUTION SYSTEM (NPES) 32,759 32,759 238 0301401F AIR FORCE SPACE AND CYBER NON-TRADITIONAL ISR FOR BATTLESPACE AWARENESS 2,904 2,904 239 0302015F E–4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER (NAOC) 3,468 3,468 240 0303131F MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN) 61,887 61,887 242 0303140F INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 10,351 10,351 243 0303142F GLOBAL FORCE MANAGEMENT—DATA INITIATIVE 1,346 1,346 246 0304260F AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE 128,110 120,110 Program decrease [–8,000] 247 0304310F COMMERCIAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 4,042 4,042 251 0305020F CCMD INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1,649 1,649 252 0305022F ISR MODERNIZATION & AUTOMATION DVMT (IMAD) 19,265 19,265 253 0305099F GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM) 4,645 4,645 254 0305103F CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE 384 384 255 0305111F WEATHER SERVICE 23,640 30,640 Commercial weather pilot [7,000] 256 0305114F AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, AND LANDING SYSTEM (ATCALS) 6,553 6,553 257 0305116F AERIAL TARGETS 449 449 260 0305128F SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES 432 432 262 0305146F DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES 4,890 4,890 264 0305179F INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS) 8,864 8,864 265 0305202F DRAGON U–2 18,660 18,660 267 0305206F AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS 121,512 139,512 Gorgon Stare Wide Area Motion Imagery program increase [10,000] Sensor Open Systems Architecture [8,000] 268 0305207F MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS 14,711 14,711 269 0305208F DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 14,152 14,152 270 0305220F RQ–4 UAV 134,589 134,589 271 0305221F NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGETING 15,049 15,049 272 0305238F NATO AGS 36,731 36,731 273 0305240F SUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE 33,547 33,547 274 0305600F INTERNATIONAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURES 13,635 13,635 275 0305881F RAPID CYBER ACQUISITION 4,262 4,262 276 0305984F PERSONNEL RECOVERY COMMAND & CTRL (PRC2) 2,207 2,207 277 0307577F INTELLIGENCE MISSION DATA (IMD) 6,277 6,277 278 0401115F C–130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON 41,973 41,973 279 0401119F C–5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS (IF) 32,560 32,560 280 0401130F C–17 AIRCRAFT (IF) 9,991 9,991 281 0401132F C–130J PROGRAM 10,674 10,674 282 0401134F LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES (LAIRCM) 5,507 5,507 283 0401218F KC–135S 4,591 4,591 286 0401318F CV–22 18,419 18,419 288 0408011F SPECIAL TACTICS / COMBAT CONTROL 7,673 7,673 290 0708055F MAINTENANCE, REPAIR & OVERHAUL SYSTEM 24,513 24,513 291 0708610F LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT) 35,225 35,225 292 0708611F SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 11,838 11,838 293 0804743F OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING 1,332 1,332 295 0901202F JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY 2,092 2,092 296 0901218F CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM 3,869 3,869 297 0901220F PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 1,584 1,584 298 0901226F AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY 1,197 1,197 299 0901538F FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 7,006 7,006 300 0901554F DEFENSE ENTERPRISE ACNTNG AND MGT SYS (DEAMS) 45,638 45,638 301 1201017F GLOBAL SENSOR INTEGRATED ON NETWORK (GSIN) 1,889 0 Transfer to Space Force [–1,889] 302 1201921F SERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM—SPACE ACTIVITIES 993 993 303 1202140F SERVICE SUPPORT TO SPACECOM ACTIVITIES 8,999 8,999 314 1203400F SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE 16,810 16,810 316 1203620F NATIONAL SPACE DEFENSE CENTER 2,687 2,687 318 1203906F NCMC—TW/AA SYSTEM 6,990 6,990 322A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 15,777,856 15,777,856 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 21,466,680 21,203,091 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF 37,391,826 37,047,337 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, SPACE FORCE APPLIED RESEARCH 001 1206601SF SPACE TECHNOLOGY 130,874 164,874 Ground based optical GEO surveillance [5,000] Rapid development of low-cost, small satellite technology [20,000] Small satellite mission operations center [9,000] SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH 130,874 164,874 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 002 1203164SF NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER EQUIPMENT) (SPACE) 390,704 390,704 003 1203710SF EO/IR WEATHER SYSTEMS 131,000 106,000 Program reduction for phase 2 risk reduction Spec OT2 [–25,000] 004 1206422SF WEATHER SYSTEM FOLLOW-ON 83,384 83,384 005 1206425SF SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS 33,359 33,359 006 1206427SF SPACE SYSTEMS PROTOTYPE TRANSITIONS (SSPT) 142,808 142,808 007 1206438SF SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY 35,575 35,575 008 1206760SF PROTECTED TACTICAL ENTERPRISE SERVICE (PTES) 114,390 109,390 Unjustified growth [–5,000] 009 1206761SF PROTECTED TACTICAL SERVICE (PTS) 205,178 200,178 Unjustified growth [–5,000] 010 1206855SF EVOLVED STRATEGIC SATCOM (ESS) 71,395 71,395 011 1206857SF SPACE RAPID CAPABILITIES OFFICE 103,518 103,518 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 1,311,311 1,276,311 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 012 1203269SF GPS III FOLLOW-ON (GPS IIIF) 263,496 253,496 Execution lagging [–10,000] 013 1203940SF SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS 41,897 41,897 014 1206421SF COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS 54,689 54,689 015 1206422SF WEATHER SYSTEM FOLLOW-ON 2,526 2,526 016 1206425SF SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS 173,074 173,074 017 1206431SF ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE) 138,257 138,257 018 1206432SF POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE) 190,235 190,235 019 1206442SF NEXT GENERATION OPIR 2,318,864 2,269,864 Block 0 GEO unjustified cost growth [–20,000] Program decrease [–29,000] 020 1206853SF NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE)—EMD 560,978 710,978 Program increase [150,000] SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 3,744,016 3,835,016 MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 021 1206116SF SPACE TEST AND TRAINING RANGE DEVELOPMENT 20,281 20,281 022 1206392SF ACQ WORKFORCE—SPACE & MISSILE SYSTEMS 183,930 183,930 023 1206398SF SPACE & MISSILE SYSTEMS CENTER—MHA 9,765 9,765 024 1206860SF ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE) 17,993 27,993 Tactically Responsive Launch Operations [10,000] 025 1206864SF SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP) 26,541 26,541 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 258,510 268,510 OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 026 1201017SF GLOBAL SENSOR INTEGRATED ON NETWORK (GSIN) 3,708 5,597 Transfer from Air Force [1,889] 027 1203001SF FAMILY OF ADVANCED BLOS TERMINALS (FAB-T) 247,229 237,229 Program decrease [–10,000] 028 1203110SF SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE) 75,480 60,480 Program decrease [–15,000] 029 1203165SF NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE AND CONTROL SEGMENTS) 1,984 1,984 030 1203173SF SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER 4,397 4,397 031 1203174SF SPACE INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND RAPID TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 44,746 39,746 Underexecution [–5,000] 032 1203182SF SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE) 11,020 16,020 Space launch range services and capabilities [5,000] 033 1203265SF GPS III SPACE SEGMENT 10,777 10,777 034 1203873SF BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE RADARS 28,179 28,179 035 1203913SF NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE) 29,157 29,157 036 1203940SF SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS 44,809 39,809 Underexecution [–5,000] 037 1206423SF GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III—OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT 481,999 471,999 Program decrease [–5,000] Unjustified growth [–5,000] 041 1206770SF ENTERPRISE GROUND SERVICES 116,791 116,791 041A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 3,632,866 3,632,866 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 4,733,142 4,695,031 SOFTWARE & DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS 042 1203614SF JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM 149,742 129,742 Unjustified increase; transfer to commercial Space Domain Awareness Services and Data [–20,000] 42A 9999999999 COMMERCIAL SATCOM 45,000 Commercial polar space-based proliferated LEO broadband services and demonstrations [25,000] Increase for commercial space domain awareness services and data [20,000] SUBTOTAL SOFTWARE & DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS 149,742 174,742 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, SPACE FORCE 10,327,595 10,414,484 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW BASIC RESEARCH 001 0601000BR DTRA BASIC RESEARCH 14,617 14,617 002 0601101E DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 479,958 479,958 003 0601110D8Z BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES 35,565 57,565 Restore Minerva research initiative [17,000] START research consortium of excellence for irregular warfare and advanced analytics [5,000] 004 0601117E BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE 53,730 53,730 005 0601120D8Z NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM 100,241 105,241 Civics education pilot [5,000] 006 0601228D8Z HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES/MINORITY INSTITUTIONS 30,975 50,975 PIPELINE program [3,000] Program increase [17,000] 007 0601384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 45,300 45,300 SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH 760,386 807,386 APPLIED RESEARCH 008 0602000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY 19,409 24,409 New energetic materials design [5,000] 009 0602115E BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY 107,568 107,568 011 0602230D8Z DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION 35,000 35,000 012 0602234D8Z LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM 41,080 41,080 013 0602251D8Z APPLIED RESEARCH FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF S&T PRIORITIES 60,722 60,722 014 0602303E INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY 435,920 403,920 Program decrease [–32,000] 015 0602383E BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE 26,950 26,950 016 0602384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 201,807 206,807 Treatment testing technology for nuclear, chemical, and biological exposure [5,000] 017 0602668D8Z CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH 15,255 15,255 018 0602702E TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY 233,271 233,271 019 0602715E MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY 250,107 250,107 020 0602716E ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY 322,693 322,693 021 0602718BR COUNTER WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION APPLIED RESEARCH 174,571 174,571 022 0602751D8Z SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE (SEI) APPLIED RESEARCH 9,573 9,573 023 1160401BB SOF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 42,464 47,464 Sustained Human Performance and Resilience [5,000] SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH 1,976,390 1,959,390 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 024 0603000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 22,920 22,920 025 0603121D8Z SO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 4,914 4,914 026 0603122D8Z COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 51,089 51,089 027 0603133D8Z FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING 25,183 25,183 029 0603160BR COUNTER WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 366,659 366,659 030 0603176C ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT 14,910 64,910 Restore low power laser demonstrator [50,000] 032 0603180C ADVANCED RESEARCH 18,687 28,687 Program increase [10,000] 033 0603225D8Z JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 18,873 18,873 034 0603286E ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS 230,978 230,978 035 0603287E SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY 158,439 158,439 036 0603288D8Z ANALYTIC ASSESSMENTS 23,775 23,775 037 0603289D8Z ADVANCED INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS 36,524 36,524 038 0603291D8Z ADVANCED INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS—MHA 14,703 14,703 039 0603294C COMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY 11,058 11,058 040 0603338D8Z DEFENSE MODERNIZATION AND PROTOTYPING 133,375 133,375 042 0603342D8Z DEFENSE INNOVATION UNIT (DIU) 26,141 26,141 043 0603375D8Z TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION 27,709 27,709 044 0603384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 188,001 188,001 045 0603527D8Z RETRACT LARCH 130,283 130,283 046 0603618D8Z JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 15,164 15,164 047 0603648D8Z JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS 85,452 85,452 048 0603662D8Z NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES 5,882 5,882 049 0603680D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 93,817 143,817 Accelerating rapid prototyping by integrating high performance computing and advanced manufacturing [5,000] Additive manufacturing training [5,000] Advanced structural manufacturing technologies [30,000] Flexible hybrid electronics [5,000] Hypersonic thermal management research [5,000] 050 0603680S MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 40,025 40,025 052 0603712S GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS 10,235 10,235 053 0603716D8Z STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM 53,862 158,862 AFFF replacement [50,000] PFAS Innovation Award Fund [5,000] PFAS remediation and disposal technology [50,000] 054 0603720S MICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT 124,049 124,049 055 0603727D8Z JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM 3,871 3,871 056 0603739E ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES 95,864 95,864 057 0603760E COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 221,724 221,724 058 0603766E NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY 661,158 661,158 059 0603767E SENSOR TECHNOLOGY 200,220 200,220 060 0603769D8Z DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 6,765 6,765 061 0603781D8Z SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE 12,598 12,598 064 0603924D8Z HIGH ENERGY LASER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 105,410 105,410 065 0603941D8Z TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 187,065 187,065 Directed energy test workloads 066 0603950D8Z NATIONAL SECURITY INNOVATION NETWORK 40,000 Restore program [40,000] 067 0604055D8Z OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT 65,000 Program increase [65,000] 070 1160402BB SOF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 89,072 94,072 SOF 3–D printing technologies [5,000] 071 1206310SDA SPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 72,422 72,422 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 3,588,876 3,913,876 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 072 0603161D8Z NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E ADC&P 32,636 32,636 073 0603600D8Z WALKOFF 106,529 106,529 075 0603851D8Z ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM 61,345 113,345 PFAS remediation and disposal technology [50,000] Program increase [2,000] 076 0603881C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT 412,627 312,627 Insufficient justification—homeland defense underlay [–100,000] 077 0603882C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT 1,004,305 919,305 Unjustified growth—RKV cancellation [–85,000] 078 0603884BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—DEM/VAL 76,167 81,167 Decontamination technologies for civilian pandemic preparedness [5,000] 079 0603884C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS 281,957 281,957 080 0603890C BMD ENABLING PROGRAMS 599,380 599,380 081 0603891C SPECIAL PROGRAMS—MDA 420,216 420,216 082 0603892C AEGIS BMD 814,936 804,936 Program decrease [–10,000] 083 0603896C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATI 593,353 593,353 084 0603898C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT 49,560 49,560 085 0603904C MISSILE DEFENSE INTEGRATION & OPERATIONS CENTER (MDIOC) 55,356 55,356 086 0603906C REGARDING TRENCH 11,863 11,863 087 0603907C SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX) 118,318 118,318 088 0603913C ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS 300,000 300,000 089 0603914C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST 378,302 378,302 090 0603915C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS 536,133 536,133 092 0603923D8Z COALITION WARFARE 10,129 10,129 093 0604011D8Z NEXT GENERATION INFORMATION COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY (5G) 449,000 400,000 Program decrease for Restoring S&T [–49,000] 094 0604016D8Z DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM 3,325 3,325 095 0604115C TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES 67,389 67,389 098 0604181C HYPERSONIC DEFENSE 206,832 206,832 099 0604250D8Z ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES 730,508 729,508 Micro nuclear reactors [50,000] Program decrease for Restoring S&T [–51,000] 100 0604294D8Z TRUSTED & ASSURED MICROELECTRONICS 489,076 489,076 101 0604331D8Z RAPID PROTOTYPING PROGRAM 102,023 82,023 Program decrease for Restoring S&T [–20,000] 102 0604341D8Z DEFENSE INNOVATION UNIT (DIU) PROTOTYPING 13,255 16,255 Talent optimization pilot program [3,000] 103 0604400D8Z DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) UNMANNED SYSTEM COMMON DEVELOPMENT 2,787 2,787 105 0604672C HOMELAND DEFENSE RADAR—HAWAII (HDR-H) 130,000 Continue radar development and siting efforts [130,000] 107 0604682D8Z WARGAMING AND SUPPORT FOR STRATEGIC ANALYSIS (SSA) 3,469 3,469 109 0604826J JOINT C5 CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT, INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY ASSESSMENTS 19,190 19,190 110 0604873C LONG RANGE DISCRIMINATION RADAR (LRDR) 137,256 137,256 111 0604874C IMPROVED HOMELAND DEFENSE INTERCEPTORS 664,138 414,138 Delayed NGI contract award [–250,000] 112 0604876C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT TEST 7,768 7,768 113 0604878C AEGIS BMD TEST 170,880 95,880 Unjustified cost growth [–75,000] 114 0604879C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSOR TEST 76,456 76,456 115 0604880C LAND-BASED SM–3 (LBSM3) 56,628 56,628 116 0604887C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE SEGMENT TEST 67,071 67,071 118 0300206R ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS 2,198 2,198 119 0303191D8Z JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) PROGRAM 997 997 120 0305103C CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE 1,148 1,148 121 1206410SDA SPACE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPING 215,994 155,994 HBTSS—transfer to 1206895C [–20,000] Unjustified growth [–40,000] 122 1206893C SPACE TRACKING & SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM 34,144 34,144 123 1206895C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS 32,068 152,068 HBTSS—transfer from 1206410SDA [20,000] HBTSS sensor payload development [100,000] SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 9,416,712 9,076,712 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 124 0604161D8Z NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E SDD 7,173 7,173 126 0604384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—EMD 319,976 319,976 127 0604771D8Z JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTIDS) 54,985 54,985 128 0605000BR COUNTER WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 15,650 15,650 129 0605013BL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 1,441 1,441 130 0605021SE HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE 7,287 7,287 131 0605022D8Z DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM 12,928 12,928 132 0605027D8Z OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES 10,259 10,259 133 0605070S DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 1,377 1,377 134 0605075D8Z CMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION 1,648 1,648 135 0605080S DEFENSE AGENCY INITIATIVES (DAI)—FINANCIAL SYSTEM 20,537 20,537 136 0605090S DEFENSE RETIRED AND ANNUITANT PAY SYSTEM (DRAS) 1,638 1,638 137 0605141BR MISSION ASSURANCE RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (MARMS) 5,500 5,500 138 0605210D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES 8,279 8,279 139 0605294D8Z TRUSTED & ASSURED MICROELECTRONICS 107,585 107,585 140 0605772D8Z NUCLEAR COMMAND, CONTROL, & COMMUNICATIONS 3,685 3,685 143 0305304D8Z DOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (EEIM) 3,275 3,275 144 0305310D8Z CWMD SYSTEMS: SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 20,585 20,585 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 603,808 603,808 MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 145 0603829J JOINT CAPABILITY EXPERIMENTATION 11,239 11,239 146 0604774D8Z DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS) 9,793 9,793 147 0604875D8Z JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT 8,497 8,497 148 0604940D8Z CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT (CTEIP) 422,451 435,451 Gulf Test range and training enhancements [13,000] 149 0604942D8Z ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS 18,379 18,379 150 0605001E MISSION SUPPORT 74,334 74,334 151 0605100D8Z JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY (JMETC) 79,046 79,046 153 0605126J JOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION (JIAMDO) 50,255 50,255 155 0605142D8Z SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 49,376 49,376 156 0605151D8Z STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—OSD 5,777 5,777 157 0605161D8Z NUCLEAR MATTERS-PHYSICAL SECURITY 16,552 16,552 158 0605170D8Z SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION 9,582 9,582 159 0605200D8Z GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE) 1,940 1,940 160 0605384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 122,951 122,951 167 0605790D8Z SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR)/ SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 3,582 3,582 168 0605797D8Z MAINTAINING TECHNOLOGY ADVANTAGE 29,566 29,566 169 0605798D8Z DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS 29,059 29,059 170 0605801KA DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC) 59,369 16,069 Program decrease [–43,300] 171 0605803SE R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING AND EVALUATION 29,420 29,420 172 0605804D8Z DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION 27,198 27,198 173 0605898E MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D 13,434 13,434 174 0605998KA MANAGEMENT HQ—DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC) 2,837 2,837 175 0606100D8Z BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS 13,173 13,173 176 0606225D8Z ODNA TECHNOLOGY AND RESOURCE ANALYSIS 3,200 3,200 177 0606589D8W DEFENSE DIGITAL SERVICE (DDS) DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT 999 999 180 0203345D8Z DEFENSE OPERATIONS SECURITY INITIATIVE (DOSI) 3,099 3,099 181 0204571J JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT 3,058 3,058 182 0208045K C4I INTEROPERABILITY 59,813 59,813 185 0303140SE INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 1,112 1,112 186 0303166J SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) CAPABILITIES 545 545 187 0303260D8Z DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION PROGRAM OFFICE (DMDPO) 1,036 1,036 188 0305172K COMBINED ADVANCED APPLICATIONS 30,824 30,824 190 0305208K DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 3,048 3,048 194 0804768J COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANSFORMATION (CE2T2)—NON-MHA 31,125 31,125 195 0808709SE DEFENSE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE (DEOMI) 100 100 196 0901598C MANAGEMENT HQ—MDA 26,902 26,902 197 0903235K JOINT SERVICE PROVIDER (JSP) 3,138 3,138 198A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 41,583 41,583 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1,297,392 1,267,092 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 199 0604130V ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS) 14,378 14,378 200 0604532K JOINT ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 132,058 132,058 201 0605127T REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH (RIO) AND PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE INFORMATION MANA 1,986 1,986 202 0605147T OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED INFORMATION SYSTEM (OHASIS) 316 316 203 0607210D8Z INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT 9,151 79,151 Autotune filter manufacturing scale-up for advanced offboard electronic warfare [10,000] Domestic organic light emitting diode microdisplay manufacturing [5,000] Domestic rare earth magnet capability [5,000] Domestic tungsten [5,000] Program increase [15,000] Radar supplier resiliency plan [5,000] Submarine workforce development and training [20,000] Ultra-hard armor [5,000] 204 0607310D8Z CWMD SYSTEMS: OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 19,082 19,082 205 0607327T GLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (G-TSCMIS) 3,992 3,992 206 0607384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT) 39,530 39,530 207 0208043J PLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM (PDAS) 3,039 3,039 212 0302019K DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION 16,324 16,324 213 0303126K LONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DCS 11,884 11,884 214 0303131K MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN) 5,560 5,560 215 0303136G KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI) 73,356 73,356 216 0303140D8Z INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 46,577 46,577 217 0303140G INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 356,713 336,713 GenCyber [20,000] Program decrease [–40,000] 218 0303140K INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 8,922 8,922 219 0303150K GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM 3,695 3,695 220 0303153K DEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION 20,113 20,113 223 0303228K JOINT REGIONAL SECURITY STACKS (JRSS) 9,728 0 Program decrease [–9,728] 231 0305128V SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES 5,700 5,700 235 0305186D8Z POLICY R&D PROGRAMS 7,144 7,144 236 0305199D8Z NET CENTRICITY 21,793 21,793 238 0305208BB DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 6,066 6,066 245 0305387D8Z HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM 2,190 2,190 252 0708012K LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 1,654 1,654 253 0708012S PACIFIC DISASTER CENTERS 1,785 1,785 254 0708047S DEFENSE PROPERTY ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM 7,301 7,301 256 1105219BB MQ–9 UAV 21,265 21,265 258 1160403BB AVIATION SYSTEMS 230,812 230,812 259 1160405BB INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 19,558 19,558 260 1160408BB OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS 136,041 151,041 Machine learning and AI technologies to enable operational maneuver [10,000] Modular expeditionary compact high-energy lasers [5,000] 261 1160431BB WARRIOR SYSTEMS 59,511 94,511 Increased research for cUAS in austere locations abroad [35,000] 262 1160432BB SPECIAL PROGRAMS 10,500 10,500 263 1160434BB UNMANNED ISR 19,154 19,154 264 1160480BB SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES 9,263 9,263 265 1160483BB MARITIME SYSTEMS 59,882 59,882 266 1160489BB GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES 4,606 4,606 267 1160490BB OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE 11,612 11,612 268 1203610K TELEPORT PROGRAM 3,239 3,239 268A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 4,746,466 4,746,466 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 6,161,946 6,252,218 SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS 269 0608197V NATIONAL BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SERVICES—SOFTWARE PILOT PROGRAM 121,676 121,676 270 0608648D8Z ACQUISITION VISIBILITY—SOFTWARE PILOT PROGRAM 16,848 16,848 271 0303150K GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM 86,750 76,750 Program decrease [–10,000] 272 0308588D8Z ALGORITHMIC WARFARE CROSS FUNCTIONAL TEAMS—SOFTWARE PILOT PROGRAM 250,107 200,107 Program decrease [–50,000] SUBTOTAL SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS 475,381 415,381 UNDISTRIBUTED 273A 9999999999 PANDEMIC PREPAREDNESS AND RESILIENCE NATIONAL SECURITY FUND 1,000,000 Program increase [1,000,000] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 1,000,000 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW 24,280,891 25,295,863 OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 001 0605118OTE OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION 100,021 100,021 002 0605131OTE LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION 70,933 70,933 003 0605814OTE OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES 39,136 39,136 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 210,090 210,090 TOTAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE 210,090 210,090 TOTAL RDT&E 106,224,793 106,489,628 4202. Research, development, test, and evaluation for overseas contingency operations SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS Line Program Item FY 2021 House RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY APPLIED RESEARCH 016 0602145A NEXT GENERATION COMBAT VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY 2,000 2,000 SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH 2,000 2,000 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 080 0603327A AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 500 500 114 0604785A INTEGRATED BASE DEFENSE (BUDGET ACTIVITY 4) 2,020 2,020 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 2,520 2,520 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 131 0604741A AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—ENG DEV 27,000 27,000 159 0605035A COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) 2,300 2,300 166 0605051A AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY DEVELOPMENT 64,625 64,625 183 0304270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 3,900 3,900 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 97,825 97,825 MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 198 0605709A EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS 1,000 1,000 209 0606003A COUNTERINTEL AND HUMAN INTEL MODERNIZATION 4,137 4,137 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 5,137 5,137 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 239 0203802A OTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 2,300 2,300 248 0303028A SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES 23,367 23,367 257 0305204A TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES 34,100 34,100 258 0305206A AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS 15,575 15,575 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 75,342 75,342 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY 182,824 182,824 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 039 0603527N RETRACT LARCH 36,500 36,500 058 0603654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT 14,461 14,461 063 0603734N CHALK CORAL 3,000 3,000 071 0603795N LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY 1,457 1,457 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 55,418 55,418 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 142 0604755N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) 1,144 1,144 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 1,144 1,144 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 229 0206625M USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP) 3,000 3,000 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 3,000 3,000 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY 59,562 59,562 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 185 0205671F JOINT COUNTER RCIED ELECTRONIC WARFARE 4,080 4,080 228 0208288F INTEL DATA APPLICATIONS 1,224 1,224 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 5,304 5,304 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF 5,304 5,304 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW APPLIED RESEARCH 010 0602134BR COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT ADVANCED STUDIES 3,699 3,699 SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH 3,699 3,699 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 026 0603122D8Z COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 19,288 19,288 028 0603134BR COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT SIMULATION 3,861 3,861 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 23,149 23,149 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 097 0604134BR COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT DEMONSTRATION, PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT, AND TESTING 19,931 19,931 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 19,931 19,931 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 260 1160408BB OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS 1,186 1,186 261 1160431BB WARRIOR SYSTEMS 5,796 5,796 263 1160434BB UNMANNED ISR 5,000 5,000 268A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 24,057 24,057 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 36,039 36,039 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW 82,818 82,818 TOTAL RDT&E 330,508 330,508 XLIII Operation and Maintenance 4301. Operation and maintenance SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Line Item FY 2021 House OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY OPERATING FORCES 020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES 159,834 143,834 Unjustified funding for Dynamic Force Employment [–16,000] 030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE 663,751 660,951 Unjustified funding for Dynamic Force Employment [–2,800] 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 956,477 956,477 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 1,157,635 1,167,984 Establishment of Joint CUAS Office [10,349] 060 AVIATION ASSETS 1,453,024 1,403,024 Unjustified funding for Dynamic Force Employment [–50,000] 070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 4,713,660 4,713,660 080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS 404,161 404,161 090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE 1,413,359 1,513,359 Program increase for depot maintenance activities [100,000] 100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 8,220,093 8,320,093 Child Youth Services program increase [100,000] 110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 3,581,071 3,647,387 Program increase for additional facility requirements [66,316] 120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 411,844 411,844 160 US AFRICA COMMAND 239,387 239,387 170 US EUROPEAN COMMAND 160,761 160,761 180 US SOUTHERN COMMAND 197,826 197,826 190 US FORCES KOREA 65,152 65,152 200 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 430,109 430,109 210 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSECURITY 464,117 464,117 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 24,692,261 24,900,126 MOBILIZATION 220 STRATEGIC MOBILITY 402,236 402,236 230 ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS 324,306 324,306 240 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS 3,653 3,653 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION 730,195 730,195 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 250 OFFICER ACQUISITION 165,142 165,142 260 RECRUIT TRAINING 76,509 76,509 270 ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING 88,523 88,523 280 SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS 535,578 535,578 290 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 981,436 981,436 300 FLIGHT TRAINING 1,204,768 1,204,768 310 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 215,195 215,195 320 TRAINING SUPPORT 575,232 575,232 330 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 722,612 672,612 Program decrease [–50,000] 340 EXAMINING 185,522 185,522 350 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 221,503 221,503 360 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING 154,651 154,651 370 JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS 173,286 173,286 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 5,299,957 5,249,957 ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 390 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 491,926 491,926 400 CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES 812,613 812,613 410 LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 676,178 676,178 420 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT 437,774 437,774 430 ADMINISTRATION 438,048 433,048 Program decrease [–5,000] 440 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 1,638,872 1,628,872 Reprioritization [–10,000] 450 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT 300,046 300,046 460 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT 701,103 701,103 470 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT 1,887,133 1,852,493 Servicewoman's Commemorative Partnership [3,000] Transfer to DAWDF—reversal of DWR transfers [–37,640] 480 ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES 195,291 195,291 490 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT 229,537 229,537 500 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT READINESS 306,370 306,370 510 INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS 373,030 373,030 520 MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS 32,719 32,719 565 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 1,069,915 1,069,915 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 9,590,555 9,540,915 UNDISTRIBUTED 570 UNDISTRIBUTED –231,457 Foreign Currency adjustments [–137,300] Historical unobligated balances [–94,157] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED –231,457 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY 40,312,968 40,189,736 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES OPERATING FORCES 010 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES 10,784 10,784 020 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE 530,425 530,425 030 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 123,737 123,737 040 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 589,582 589,582 050 AVIATION ASSETS 89,332 89,332 060 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 387,545 387,545 070 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS 97,569 97,569 080 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE 43,148 43,148 090 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 587,098 587,098 100 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 327,180 333,239 Program increase for additional facility requirements [6,059] 110 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 28,783 28,783 120 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 2,745 2,745 130 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSECURITY 7,438 7,438 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 2,825,366 2,831,425 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 140 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 15,530 15,530 150 ADMINISTRATION 17,761 17,761 160 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 14,256 14,256 170 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT 6,564 6,564 180 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 55,240 55,240 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 109,351 109,351 UNDISTRIBUTED 210 UNDISTRIBUTED –10,100 Historical unobligated balances [–10,100] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED –10,100 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES 2,934,717 2,930,676 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG OPERATING FORCES 010 MANEUVER UNITS 769,449 769,449 020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES 204,604 204,604 030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE 812,072 812,072 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 103,650 103,650 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 32,485 32,485 060 AVIATION ASSETS 1,011,142 1,011,142 070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 712,881 712,881 080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS 47,732 47,732 090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE 265,408 265,408 100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 1,106,704 1,106,704 110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 876,032 892,254 Program increase for additional facility requirements [16,222] 120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1,050,257 1,050,257 130 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 7,998 7,998 140 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSECURITY 7,756 7,756 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 7,008,170 7,024,392 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 150 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 8,018 8,018 160 ADMINISTRATION 74,309 74,309 170 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 66,140 66,140 180 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT 9,087 9,087 190 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT 251,714 251,714 200 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT 2,576 2,576 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 411,844 411,844 UNDISTRIBUTED 220 UNDISTRIBUTED –19,900 Historical unobligated balances [–19,900] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED –19,900 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG 7,420,014 7,416,336 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY OPERATING FORCES 010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS 5,738,746 5,359,952 Transfer to OCO [–378,794] 020 FLEET AIR TRAINING 2,213,673 2,161,673 Restoration of Congressional mark [–52,000] 030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES 57,144 57,144 040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT 171,949 171,949 050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT 838,767 834,067 Restoration of Congressional mark [–4,700] 060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE 1,459,447 1,459,447 070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 57,789 57,789 080 AVIATION LOGISTICS 1,264,665 1,234,430 Restoration of Congressional mark [–30,235] 090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS –178,060 Insufficient justification [–195,000] Preservation of LCS 3 and LCS 4 [16,940] 100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING 1,117,067 1,110,267 Restoration of Congressional mark [–6,800] 110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE 7,859,104 8,530,664 Preservation of LCS 3 and LCS 4 [21,560] Realignment from Procurement for Ship Depot Maintenance Pilot [650,000] 120 SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 2,262,196 2,261,796 Preservation of LCS 3 and LCS 4 [12,600] Restoration of Congressional mark [–13,000] 125 SHIPYARD INFRASTRUCTURE OPTIMIZATION PLAN 90,000 Realignment from Sustainment, Readiness, and Modernization [90,000] 130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE 1,521,360 1,502,360 Restoration of Congressional mark [–19,000] 140 SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE 274,087 274,087 150 WARFARE TACTICS 741,609 741,609 160 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY 401,382 401,382 170 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES 1,546,273 936,273 Restoration of Congressional mark [–60,000] Transfer to OCO [–550,000] 180 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 177,951 177,951 190 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS 61,484 61,484 200 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT 102,330 124,130 Indo-Pacific Counter-Terrorism Information Facility [2,000] Indo-Pacific Special Operations Joint Task Force [6,300] INDOPACOM Mission Command and Control (MPE-C2) [13,500] 210 MILITARY INFORMATION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 8,810 8,810 220 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 567,496 567,496 230 FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE 1,428,102 1,428,102 240 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE 995,762 950,762 Restoration of Congressional mark [–45,000] 250 OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT 524,008 524,008 260 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION 1,229,056 1,184,056 Program decrease [–25,000] Restoration of Congressional mark [–20,000] 270 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION 3,453,099 3,427,045 Program increase for additional facility requirements [63,946] Realignment to Shipyard Infrastructure Optimization Plan [–90,000] 280 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 4,627,966 4,603,966 Restoration of Congressional mark [–24,000] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 40,701,322 40,064,639 MOBILIZATION 290 SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE 849,993 657,900 Realignment to National Defense Sealift Fund [–314,193] Restoration of Congressional mark [–20,000] Strategic sealift (MSC surge) annual operating result loss [57,000] Surge sealift readiness [85,100] 300 READY RESERVE FORCE 436,029 376,029 Acquisition and conversion of additional used vessels [60,000] Realignment to National Defense Sealift Fund [–120,000] 310 SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS 286,416 258,416 Restoration of Congressional mark [–28,000] 320 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS 99,402 42,190 Realignment to National Defense Sealift Fund [–57,212] 330 COAST GUARD SUPPORT 25,235 25,235 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION 1,697,075 1,359,770 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 340 OFFICER ACQUISITION 186,117 186,117 350 RECRUIT TRAINING 13,206 13,206 360 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS 163,683 163,683 370 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 947,841 930,641 Restoration of Congressional mark [–17,200] 380 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 367,647 369,147 Sea Cadets [1,500] 390 TRAINING SUPPORT 254,928 254,928 400 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 206,305 206,305 410 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 103,799 103,799 420 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING 66,060 66,060 430 JUNIOR ROTC 56,276 56,276 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 2,365,862 2,350,162 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 440 ADMINISTRATION 1,249,410 1,186,410 Program decrease [–30,000] Restoration of Congressional mark [–33,000] 450 CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 189,625 189,625 460 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 499,904 499,904 470 MEDICAL ACTIVITIES 196,747 196,747 480 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 165,708 160,614 Unjustified funding for Dynamic Force Employment [–5,094] 500 PLANNING, ENGINEERING, AND PROGRAM SUPPORT 519,716 519,716 510 ACQUISITION, LOGISTICS, AND OVERSIGHT 751,184 690,564 Transfer to DAWDF—reversal of DWR transfers [–60,620] 520 INVESTIGATIVE AND SECURITY SERVICES 747,519 736,519 Restoration of Congressional mark [–11,000] 625 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 608,670 608,670 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 4,928,483 4,788,769 UNDISTRIBUTED 770 UNDISTRIBUTED –71,900 Foreign Currency adjustments [–48,500] Historical unobligated balances [–23,400] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED –71,900 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY 49,692,742 48,491,440 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS OPERATING FORCES 010 OPERATIONAL FORCES 941,143 527,743 Transfer to OCO [–400,000] Unjustified funding for Dynamic Force Employment [–13,400] 020 FIELD LOGISTICS 1,277,798 1,277,798 030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE 206,907 206,907 040 MARITIME PREPOSITIONING 103,614 103,614 050 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 215,974 215,974 060 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 938,063 955,434 Program increase for additional facility requirements [17,371] 070 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 2,264,680 2,360,680 Program increase [96,000] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 5,948,179 5,648,150 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 080 RECRUIT TRAINING 20,751 20,751 090 OFFICER ACQUISITION 1,193 1,193 100 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 110,149 110,149 110 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 69,509 69,509 120 TRAINING SUPPORT 412,613 412,613 130 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 215,464 215,464 140 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 33,719 33,719 150 JUNIOR ROTC 25,784 25,784 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 889,182 889,182 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 160 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 32,005 32,005 170 ADMINISTRATION 399,363 399,363 215 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 59,878 59,878 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 491,246 491,246 UNDISTRIBUTED 230 UNDISTRIBUTED –19,700 Foreign Currency adjustments [–13,400] Historical unobligated balances [–6,300] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED –19,700 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS 7,328,607 7,008,878 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES OPERATING FORCES 010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS 635,070 635,070 020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE 8,713 8,713 030 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE 105,088 105,088 040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 398 398 050 AVIATION LOGISTICS 27,284 27,284 070 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 17,894 17,894 080 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES 132,862 132,862 090 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 453 453 100 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION 26,073 26,073 110 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION 48,762 49,665 Program increase for additional facility requirements [903] 120 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 103,580 103,580 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 1,106,177 1,107,080 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 130 ADMINISTRATION 1,927 1,927 140 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 15,895 15,895 150 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 3,047 3,047 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 20,869 20,869 UNDISTRIBUTED 190 UNDISTRIBUTED –3,800 Historical unobligated balances [–3,800] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED –3,800 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES 1,127,046 1,124,149 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 010 OPERATING FORCES 104,616 104,616 020 DEPOT MAINTENANCE 17,053 17,053 030 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION 41,412 42,179 Program increase for additional facility requirements [767] 040 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 107,773 107,773 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 270,854 271,621 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 050 ADMINISTRATION 13,802 13,802 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 13,802 13,802 UNDISTRIBUTED 70 UNDISTRIBUTED –700 Historical unobligated balances [–700] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED –700 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE 284,656 284,723 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE OPERATING FORCES 010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES 731,511 733,181 A–10 retention [1,670] 020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES 1,275,485 1,275,485 030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS) 1,437,095 1,449,525 A–10 retention [12,430] 040 DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 154,260 A–10 retention [81,460] KC–135 and KC–10 aircraft retention [72,800] 050 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 3,241,216 3,301,238 Program increase for additional facility requirements [60,022] 060 CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT 235,816 235,816 070 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT 1,508,342 1,508,342 080 FLYING HOUR PROGRAM 4,458,457 4,511,317 A–10 retention [52,860] 090 BASE SUPPORT 7,497,288 7,487,088 Unjustified funding for Dynamic Force Employment [–10,200] 100 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING 849,842 849,842 110 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS 1,067,055 820,725 Realignment from Base to OCO [–246,330] 120 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 698,579 693,579 Program decrease [–5,000] 150 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS 34,194 34,194 160 US NORTHCOM/NORAD 204,268 204,268 170 US STRATCOM 526,809 526,809 180 US CYBERCOM 314,524 314,524 190 US CENTCOM 186,116 186,116 200 US SOCOM 9,881 9,881 210 US TRANSCOM 1,046 1,046 230 USSPACECOM 249,022 249,022 235 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 1,289,339 1,289,339 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 25,815,885 25,835,597 MOBILIZATION 240 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS 1,350,031 1,110,031 Realignment from Base to OCO [–240,000] 250 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS 647,168 647,168 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION 1,997,199 1,757,199 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 260 OFFICER ACQUISITION 142,548 142,548 270 RECRUIT TRAINING 25,720 25,720 280 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) 128,295 128,295 290 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 417,335 417,335 300 FLIGHT TRAINING 615,033 615,033 310 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 298,795 298,795 320 TRAINING SUPPORT 85,844 85,844 330 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 155,065 155,065 340 EXAMINING 4,474 4,474 350 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 219,349 219,349 360 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING 361,570 371,570 Sustainment Workforce Development Program increase [10,000] 370 JUNIOR ROTC 72,126 72,126 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 2,526,154 2,536,154 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 380 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS 672,426 672,426 390 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 145,130 103,070 Transfer to DAWDF—reversal of DWR transfers [–42,060] 400 ADMINISTRATION 851,251 851,251 410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 28,554 28,554 420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 1,188,414 1,183,814 Program Decrease [–4,600] 430 CIVIL AIR PATROL 28,772 43,215 Program increase [14,443] 450 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT 158,803 158,803 455 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 1,338,009 1,338,009 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 4,411,359 4,379,142 UNDISTRIBUTED 550 UNDISTRIBUTED –72,700 Foreign Currency adjustments [–39,400] Historical unobligated balances [–33,300] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED –72,700 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE 34,750,597 34,435,392 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, SPACE FORCE OPERATING FORCES 020 GLOBAL C3I & EARLY WARNING 276,109 276,109 030 SPACE LAUNCH OPERATIONS 177,056 177,056 040 SPACE OPERATIONS 475,338 475,338 050 EDUCATION & TRAINING 18,660 18,660 060 SPECIAL PROGRAMS 137,315 137,315 070 DEPOT MAINTENANCE 250,324 250,324 080 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS & SYSTEM SUPPORT 1,063,969 1,060,969 Program decrease [–3,000] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 2,398,771 2,395,771 ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE WIDE ACTIVITIES 090 ADMINISTRATION 132,523 132,523 SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE WIDE ACTIVITIES 132,523 132,523 UNDISTRIBUTED 110 UNDISTRIBUTED –2,400 Historical unobligated balances [–2,400] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED –2,400 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, SPACE FORCE 2,531,294 2,525,894 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES 1,782,016 1,782,016 020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 215,209 215,209 030 DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 453,896 476,096 KC–135 and KC–10 aircraft retention [22,200] 040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 103,414 105,329 Program increase for additional facility requirements [1,915] 050 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT 224,977 224,977 060 BASE SUPPORT 452,468 452,468 070 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 2,259 2,259 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 3,234,239 3,258,354 ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 080 ADMINISTRATION 74,258 74,258 090 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 23,121 23,121 100 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC) 12,006 12,006 110 OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP) 6,165 6,165 120 AUDIOVISUAL 495 495 SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 116,045 116,045 UNDISTRIBUTED 130 UNDISTRIBUTED –9,100 Historical unobligated balances [–9,100] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED –9,100 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE 3,350,284 3,365,299 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG OPERATING FORCES 010 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS 2,476,205 2,476,205 020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 611,325 611,325 030 DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1,138,919 1,153,919 KC–135 aircraft retention [15,000] 040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 323,605 359,598 Installation recovery [30,000] Program increase for additional facility requirements [5,993] 050 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT 1,100,828 1,100,828 060 BASE SUPPORT 962,438 962,438 070 CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT 27,028 27,028 080 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 16,380 16,380 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 6,656,728 6,707,721 ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES 090 ADMINISTRATION 48,218 48,218 100 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 48,696 48,696 SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES 96,914 96,914 UNDISTRIBUTED 110 UNDISTRIBUTED –13,300 Historical unobligated balances [–13,300] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED –13,300 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG 6,753,642 6,791,335 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE OPERATING FORCES 010 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF 439,111 439,111 020 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF—CE2T2 535,728 535,728 030 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF—CYBER 24,728 24,728 040 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND COMBAT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES 1,069,971 1,069,971 050 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 9,800 9,800 060 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND INTELLIGENCE 561,907 556,907 Unjustified growth [–5,000] 070 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND MAINTENANCE 685,097 680,097 Program decrease [–5,000] 080 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND MANAGEMENT/OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 158,971 158,971 090 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND OPERATIONAL SUPPORT 1,062,748 1,062,748 100 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND THEATER FORCES 2,598,385 2,598,385 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 7,146,446 7,136,446 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 120 DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY 162,963 162,963 130 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF 95,684 95,684 140 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 33,301 33,301 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 291,948 291,948 ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 160 CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS 147,993 167,993 Program increase—STARBASE [20,000] 180 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY 604,835 636,565 Restoration of DWR reductions [31,730] 190 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY—CYBER 3,282 3,282 210 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY 1,370,681 1,445,781 Restoration of DWR reductions [75,100] 220 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY—CYBER 22,532 22,532 230 DEFENSE COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY AGENCY 949,008 949,008 250 DEFENSE COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY AGENCY—CYBER 9,577 9,577 260 DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY 799,952 813,356 Defense Flagship Language and Project Global Officer program increase [13,404] 270 DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY—CYBER 20,806 20,806 280 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY 1,883,190 1,871,590 JRSS program decrease [–11,600] 290 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY—CYBER 582,639 582,639 330 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY 37,637 37,637 340 DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY 382,084 412,084 Maternity Uniform Pilot Program [10,000] Program increase—PTAP [20,000] 350 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY 196,997 205,997 Stars and Stripes [9,000] 360 DEFENSE PERSONNEL ACCOUNTING AGENCY 129,225 129,225 370 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY 598,559 598,559 400 DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 38,432 38,432 410 DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY 591,780 591,780 430 DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY—CYBER 24,635 24,635 440 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY 2,941,429 2,991,429 Impact Aid [40,000] Impact Aid for children with disabilities [10,000] 450 MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY 505,858 505,858 480 OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT 40,272 129,272 Defense Community Infrastructure Program [50,000] Guam Public Health Laboratory [19,000] Restoration of DWR reduction [20,000] 490 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1,540,446 1,619,446 Additional FTEs, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environment [2,000] Additional FTEs, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Facilities Management [2,000] Basic needs allowance [50,000] JASON scientific advisory group [3,000] National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence (NSCAI) [2,500] Program decrease [–15,500] Program increase—Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative [25,000] Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, medical intelligence improvements [10,000] 500 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE—CYBER 51,630 51,630 510 SPACE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 48,166 36,166 Reduction for studies [–7,000] Unjustified growth [–5,000] 530 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES 340,291 340,291 535 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 17,348,749 17,348,749 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 31,210,685 31,584,319 UNDISTRIBUTED 600 UNDISTRIBUTED –88,000 Foreign Currency adjustments [–18,700] Historical unobligated balances [–69,300] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED –88,000 TOTAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE 38,649,079 38,924,713 US COURT OF APPEALS FOR ARMED FORCES, DEF ADMINISTRATION AND ASSOCIATED ACTIVITIES 010 US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE 15,211 15,211 SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND ASSOCIATED ACTIVITIES 15,211 15,211 TOTAL US COURT OF APPEALS FOR ARMED FORCES, DEF 15,211 15,211 DOD ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT FUND ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT 010 ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD 58,181 198,501 Transfer from services—reversal of DWR transfers [140,320] SUBTOTAL ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT 58,181 198,501 TOTAL DOD ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT FUND 58,181 198,501 OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER, AND CIVIC AID HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE 010 OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID 109,900 109,900 SUBTOTAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE 109,900 109,900 TOTAL OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER, AND CIVIC AID 109,900 109,900 COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ACCOUNT COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 010 COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 238,490 373,690 Restoration of funding [135,200] SUBTOTAL COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 238,490 373,690 TOTAL COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ACCOUNT 238,490 373,690 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 050 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY 207,518 207,518 SUBTOTAL DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 207,518 207,518 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 060 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY 335,932 335,932 SUBTOTAL DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 335,932 335,932 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 070 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE 303,926 303,926 SUBTOTAL DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 303,926 303,926 DEFENSE-WIDE 080 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE 9,105 9,105 SUBTOTAL DEFENSE-WIDE 9,105 9,105 DEFENSE-WIDE 090 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES 216,587 266,587 Military Munitions Response Program [50,000] SUBTOTAL DEFENSE-WIDE 216,587 266,587 TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION 1,073,068 1,123,068 UNDISTRIBUTED 010 UNDISTRIBUTED –1,455,870 Excessive standard price for fuel [–1,455,870] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED –1,455,870 TOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED –1,455,870 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE 196,630,496 193,853,071 4302. Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS Line Item FY 2021 House OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY OPERATING FORCES 010 MANEUVER UNITS 4,114,001 3,789,001 Drawdown from Operation Freedom's Sentinel [–75,000] Unjustified funding for Dynamic Force Employment [–250,000] 030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE 32,811 32,811 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 2,542,760 2,102,760 Drawdown from Operation Freedom's Sentinel [–440,000] 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 162,557 122,557 Drawdown from Operation Freedom's Sentinel [–40,000] 060 AVIATION ASSETS 204,396 179,572 Drawdown from Operation Freedom's Sentinel [–24,824] 070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 5,716,734 4,716,734 Drawdown from Operation Freedom's Sentinel [–1,000,000] 080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS 180,048 140,048 Drawdown from Operation Freedom's Sentinel [–40,000] 090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE 81,125 81,125 100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 219,029 219,029 110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 301,017 301,017 130 ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES 966,649 782,649 Drawdown from Operation Freedom's Sentinel [–184,000] 140 COMMANDER'S EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM 2,500 2,500 150 RESET 403,796 803,796 Retrograde from Operation Freedom's Sentinel [400,000] 160 US AFRICA COMMAND 100,422 100,422 170 US EUROPEAN COMMAND 120,043 120,043 200 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 98,461 98,461 210 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSECURITY 21,256 21,256 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 15,267,605 13,613,781 MOBILIZATION 230 ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS 103,052 103,052 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION 103,052 103,052 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 290 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 89,943 89,943 320 TRAINING SUPPORT 2,550 2,550 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 92,493 92,493 ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 390 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 521,090 821,090 Retrograde from Operation Freedom's Sentinel [300,000] 400 CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES 43,897 43,897 410 LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 68,423 68,423 420 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT 29,162 29,162 440 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 11,447 11,447 470 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT 5,839 5,839 490 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT 48,782 48,782 510 INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS 50,000 50,000 565 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 895,964 895,964 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 1,674,604 1,974,604 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY 17,137,754 15,783,930 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES OPERATING FORCES 020 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE 17,193 17,193 060 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 440 440 090 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 15,766 15,766 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 33,399 33,399 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES 33,399 33,399 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG OPERATING FORCES 010 MANEUVER UNITS 25,746 25,746 020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES 40 40 030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE 983 983 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 22 22 060 AVIATION ASSETS 20,624 20,624 070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 7,914 7,914 100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 24,417 24,417 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 79,746 79,746 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 170 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 46 46 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 46 46 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG 79,792 79,792 AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND AFGHAN NATIONAL ARMY 010 SUSTAINMENT 1,065,932 1,065,932 020 INFRASTRUCTURE 64,501 64,501 030 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION 47,854 47,854 040 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS 56,780 56,780 SUBTOTAL AFGHAN NATIONAL ARMY 1,235,067 1,235,067 AFGHAN NATIONAL POLICE 050 SUSTAINMENT 434,500 434,500 060 INFRASTRUCTURE 448 448 070 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION 108,231 108,231 080 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS 58,993 58,993 SUBTOTAL AFGHAN NATIONAL POLICE 602,172 602,172 AFGHAN AIR FORCE 090 SUSTAINMENT 534,102 534,102 100 INFRASTRUCTURE 9,532 9,532 110 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION 58,487 58,487 120 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS 233,803 233,803 SUBTOTAL AFGHAN AIR FORCE 835,924 835,924 AFGHAN SPECIAL SECURITY FORCES UNDISTRIBUTED 130 SUSTAINMENT 680,024 680,024 140 INFRASTRUCTURE 2,532 2,532 150 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION 486,808 486,808 160 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS 173,085 173,085 SUBTOTAL AFGHAN SPECIAL SECURITY FORCES 1,342,449 1,342,449 170 UNDISTRIBUTED –500,000 Insufficient justification [–500,000] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED –500,000 TOTAL AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND 4,015,612 3,515,612 COUNTER ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) COUNTER ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) 010 IRAQ 645,000 500,000 Program decrease [–145,000] 020 SYRIA 200,000 200,000 SUBTOTAL COUNTER ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) 845,000 700,000 TOTAL COUNTER ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) 845,000 700,000 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY OPERATING FORCES 010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS 382,062 760,856 Transfer from base [378,794] 030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES 832 832 040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT 17,840 17,840 050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT 210,692 210,692 060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE 170,580 170,580 070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 5,854 5,854 080 AVIATION LOGISTICS 33,707 33,707 090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS 5,817,696 5,817,696 100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING 20,741 20,741 110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE 2,072,470 2,072,470 130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE 59,254 59,254 140 SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE 18,000 18,000 150 WARFARE TACTICS 17,324 17,324 160 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY 22,581 22,581 170 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES 772,441 1,322,441 Transfer from base [550,000] 180 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 5,788 5,788 200 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT 24,800 24,800 220 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 369 369 240 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE 567,247 567,247 250 OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT 12,571 12,571 270 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION 70,041 70,041 280 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 218,792 218,792 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 10,521,682 11,450,476 MOBILIZATION 320 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS 22,589 22,589 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION 22,589 22,589 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 370 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 53,204 53,204 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 53,204 53,204 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 440 ADMINISTRATION 9,983 9,983 460 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 7,805 7,805 480 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 72,097 72,097 510 ACQUISITION, LOGISTICS, AND OVERSIGHT 11,354 11,354 520 INVESTIGATIVE AND SECURITY SERVICES 1,591 1,591 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 102,830 102,830 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY 10,700,305 11,629,099 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS OPERATING FORCES 010 OPERATIONAL FORCES 727,989 1,127,989 Transfer from base [400,000] 020 FIELD LOGISTICS 195,001 195,001 030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE 55,183 55,183 050 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 10,000 10,000 070 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 24,569 24,569 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 1,012,742 1,412,742 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 120 TRAINING SUPPORT 28,458 28,458 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 28,458 28,458 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 160 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 61,400 61,400 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 61,400 61,400 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS 1,102,600 1,502,600 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES OPERATING FORCES 020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE 522 522 030 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE 11,861 11,861 080 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES 9,109 9,109 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 21,492 21,492 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES 21,492 21,492 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 010 OPERATING FORCES 7,627 7,627 040 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 1,080 1,080 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 8,707 8,707 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE 8,707 8,707 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE OPERATING FORCES 010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES 125,551 125,551 020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES 916,538 978,538 MQ–9 government owned-contractor operated combat line operations in U.S. Central Command [62,000] 030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS) 93,970 93,970 040 DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 3,528,059 3,528,059 050 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 147,264 147,264 060 CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT 10,842 10,842 070 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT 7,187,100 7,187,100 080 FLYING HOUR PROGRAM 2,031,548 2,031,548 090 BASE SUPPORT 1,540,444 1,478,444 Program decrease [–62,000] 100 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING 13,709 13,709 110 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS 345,800 592,130 Realignment from Base to OCO [246,330] 120 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 17,936 17,936 130 TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 36,820 36,820 140 LAUNCH FACILITIES 70 70 150 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS 1,450 1,450 160 US NORTHCOM/NORAD 725 725 170 US STRATCOM 856 856 180 US CYBERCOM 35,189 35,189 190 US CENTCOM 126,934 126,934 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 16,160,805 16,407,135 MOBILIZATION 240 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS 1,271,439 1,511,439 Realignment from Base to OCO [240,000] 250 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS 120,866 120,866 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION 1,392,305 1,632,305 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 260 OFFICER ACQUISITION 200 200 270 RECRUIT TRAINING 352 352 290 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 27,010 27,010 300 FLIGHT TRAINING 844 844 310 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 1,199 1,199 320 TRAINING SUPPORT 1,320 1,320 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 30,925 30,925 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 380 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS 164,701 164,701 390 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 11,782 11,782 400 ADMINISTRATION 3,886 3,886 410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 355 355 420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 100,831 100,831 450 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT 29,928 29,928 455 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 34,502 34,502 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 345,985 345,985 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE 17,930,020 18,416,350 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, SPACE FORCE OPERATING FORCES 020 GLOBAL C3I & EARLY WARNING 227 227 030 SPACE LAUNCH OPERATIONS 321 321 040 SPACE OPERATIONS 15,135 15,135 070 DEPOT MAINTENANCE 18,268 18,268 080 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS & SYSTEM SUPPORT 43,164 43,164 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 77,115 77,115 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, SPACE FORCE 77,115 77,115 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 030 DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 24,408 24,408 060 BASE SUPPORT 5,682 5,682 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 30,090 30,090 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE 30,090 30,090 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG OPERATING FORCES 020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 3,739 3,739 030 DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 61,862 61,862 050 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT 97,108 97,108 060 BASE SUPPORT 12,933 12,933 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 175,642 175,642 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG 175,642 175,642 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE OPERATING FORCES 010 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF 3,799 3,799 020 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF—CE2T2 6,634 6,634 040 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND COMBAT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES 898,024 893,024 Maritime Support Vessel [–5,000] 060 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND INTELLIGENCE 1,244,553 1,214,553 Program decrease [–30,000] 070 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND MAINTENANCE 354,951 354,951 090 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND OPERATIONAL SUPPORT 104,535 104,535 100 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND THEATER FORCES 757,744 732,744 Unjustified growth [–25,000] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 3,370,240 3,310,240 ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 180 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY 1,247 1,247 210 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY 21,723 21,723 280 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY 56,256 56,256 290 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY—CYBER 3,524 3,524 330 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY 156,373 156,373 350 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY 3,555 9,555 Stars and Stripes [6,000] 370 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY 1,557,763 1,337,763 Program increase—security cooperation [30,000] Transfer to Ukraine Security Assistance [–250,000] 410 DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY 297,486 297,486 490 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 16,984 16,984 530 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES 1,997 1,997 535 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 535,106 535,106 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 2,652,014 2,438,014 TOTAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE 6,022,254 5,748,254 UKRAINE SECURITY ASSISTANCE UKRAINE SECURITY ASSISTANCE 010 UKRAINE SECURITY ASSISTANCE INITIATIVE 250,000 Transfer from Defense Security Cooperation Agency [250,000] SUBTOTAL UKRAINE SECURITY ASSISTANCE 250,000 TOTAL UKRAINE SECURITY ASSISTANCE 250,000 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE 58,179,782 57,972,082 XLIV Military Personnel 4401. Military personnel SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL Item FY 2021 House Military Personnel Appropriations 150,524,104 149,384,304 Historical unobligated balances –924,000 Foreign Currency adjustments –169,800 Standardization of payment of hazardous duty incentive pay 50,000 Program decrease—Marine Corps –96,000 Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions 8,372,741 8,372,741 4402. Military personnel for overseas contingency operations SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS Item FY 2021 House Military Personnel Appropriations 4,602,593 4,602,593 XLV Other Authorizations 4501. Other authorizations SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS Item FY 2021 House WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY ARMY ARSENALS INITIATIVE 32,551 32,551 ARMY SUPPLY MANAGEMENT 24,166 24,166 TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY 56,717 56,717 WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE WORKING CAPITAL FUND WORKING CAPITAL FUND 95,712 95,712 TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE 95,712 95,712 WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE WORKING CAPITAL FUND SUPPORT WORKING CAPITAL FUND SUPPORT 49,821 49,821 TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE 49,821 49,821 WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA WORKING CAPITAL FUND SUPPORT 1,146,660 1,146,660 TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA 1,146,660 1,146,660 NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND SEALIFT RECAPITALIZATION 170,000 Accelerate design of a commercial-based sealift ship [50,000] Transfer from OMN–300 for acquisition of four used sealift vessels [120,000] SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE 314,193 Transfer from OMN–290 [314,193] EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES 57,212 Transfer from OMN–320 [57,212] TOTAL NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND 541,405 CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION CHEM DEMILITARIZATION—O&M 106,691 101,691 Program decrease [–5,000] CHEM DEMILITARIZATION—RDT&E 782,193 774,193 Program decrease [–8,000] CHEM DEMILITARIZATION—PROC 616 616 TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION 889,500 876,500 DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF COUNTER-NARCOTICS SUPPORT 546,203 546,203 DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM 123,704 123,704 NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG PROGRAM 94,211 94,211 NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG SCHOOLS 5,511 5,511 TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF 769,629 769,629 OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 368,279 384,536 Additional oversight of coronavirus relief [16,257] OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL—CYBER OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL—CYBER 1,204 1,204 OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL—RDTE 1,098 1,098 OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL—PROCUREMENT 858 858 TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 371,439 387,696 DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM IN-HOUSE CARE 9,560,564 9,565,564 Program decrease [–31,000] Reverse DWR savings from downsizing MTFs [36,000] PRIVATE SECTOR CARE 15,841,887 15,841,887 CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT 1,338,269 1,348,269 Global Emerging Infectious Surveillance Program [10,000] INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 2,039,910 2,039,910 MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES 330,627 330,627 EDUCATION AND TRAINING 315,691 341,691 Health Professions Scholarship Program [10,000] Restoring funding for Tri-Service Nursing Research Program within USUHS [6,000] Reverse DWR cuts to USUHS [10,000] BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS 1,922,605 1,927,605 Medical Surge Partnership Pilot [5,000] R&D RESEARCH 8,913 8,913 R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT 73,984 73,984 R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 225,602 225,602 R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION 132,331 132,331 R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT 55,748 70,748 Freeze-dried platelets [15,000] R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT 48,672 48,672 R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT 17,215 17,215 PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING 22,932 22,932 PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION 215,618 215,618 PROC MILITARY HEALTH SYSTEM—DESKTOP TO DATACENTER 70,872 70,872 PROC DOD HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MODERNIZATION 308,504 308,504 SOFTWARE & DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS 160,428 160,428 UNDISTRIBUTED –9,800 Foreign Currency adjustments [–9,800] TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 32,690,372 32,741,572 TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 36,069,850 36,665,712 4502. Other authorizations for overseas contingency operations SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS Item FY 2021 House WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY ARMY ARSENALS INITIATIVE ARMY SUPPLY MANAGEMENT 20,090 20,090 TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY 20,090 20,090 OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 24,069 24,069 TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 24,069 24,069 DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM IN-HOUSE CARE 65,072 65,072 PRIVATE SECTOR CARE 296,828 296,828 CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT 3,198 3,198 TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 365,098 365,098 TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 409,257 409,257 XLVI Military Construction 4601. Military construction SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION Account State/Country and Installation Project Title FY 2021 House Alaska Army Fort Wainwright Child Development Center 0 32,500 Army Fort Wainwright Unaccompanied Enlisted Personnel Housing 0 59,000 Arizona Army Yuma Proving Ground Ready Building 14,000 14,000 Colorado Army Fort Carson, Colorado Physical Fitness Facility 28,000 28,000 Georgia Army Fort Gillem Forensic Laboratory 71,000 71,000 Army Fort Gordon Adv Individual Training Barracks Cplx, Ph3 80,000 80,000 Hawaii Army Fort Shafter Child Development Center—School Age 0 26,000 Army Schofield Barracks Child Development Center 0 39,000 Army Wheeler Army Air Field Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 89,000 89,000 Louisiana Army Fort Polk, Louisiana Information Systems Facility 25,000 25,000 Oklahoma Army McAlester AAP Ammunition Demolition Shop 35,000 35,000 Pennsylvania Army Carlisle Barracks General Instruction Building, Incr2 38,000 0 South Carolina Army Fort Jackson Trainee Barracks Complex 3, Ph2 0 7,000 Virginia Army Humphreys Engineer Center Training Support Facility 51,000 51,000 Worldwide Unspecified Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Host Nation Support 39,000 39,000 Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 129,436 69,436 Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 50,900 50,900 Military Construction, Army Total 650,336 715,836 Arizona Navy Yuma Bachelor Enlisted Quarters Replacement 0 59,600 Bahrain Island Navy SW Asia Ship to Shore Utility Services 68,340 68,340 California Navy Camp Pendleton, California 1st MARDIV Operations Complex 68,530 68,530 Navy Camp Pendleton, California I MEF Consolidated Information Center (Inc) 37,000 37,000 Navy Lemoore F–35C Hangar 6 Phase 2 (Mod 3/4) 128,070 98,070 Navy Lemoore F–35C Simulator Facility & Electrical Upgrade 59,150 59,150 Navy San Diego Pier 6 Replacement 128,500 98,500 Navy Twentynine Palms, California Wastewater Treatment Plant 76,500 76,500 Greece Navy Souda Bay Communication Center 50,180 50,180 Guam Navy Andersen AFB Ordnance Operations Admin 21,280 21,280 Navy Joint Region Marianas Bachelor Enlisted Quarters H (Inc) 80,000 0 Navy Joint Region Marianas Base Warehouse 55,410 55,410 Navy Joint Region Marianas Central Fuel Station 35,950 35,950 Navy Joint Region Marianas Central Issue Facility 45,290 45,290 Navy Joint Region Marianas Combined EOD Facility 37,600 37,600 Navy Joint Region Marianas DAR Bridge Improvements 40,180 40,180 Navy Joint Region Marianas DAR Road Strengthening 70,760 70,760 Navy Joint Region Marianas Distribution Warehouse 77,930 77,930 Navy Joint Region Marianas Individual Combat Skills Training 17,430 17,430 Navy Joint Region Marianas Joint Communication Upgrade 166,000 22,000 Hawaii Navy Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam Waterfront Improve, Wharves S1,S11–13,S20–21 48,990 48,990 Navy Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam Waterfront Improvements Wharves S8–S10 65,910 65,910 Japan Navy Yokosuka Pier 5 (Berths 2 and 3) (Inc) 74,692 0 Maine Navy Kittery Multi-Mission Drydock #1 Exten., Ph 1 (Inc) 160,000 160,000 Nevada Navy Fallon Range Training Complex, Phase 1 29,040 29,040 North Carolina Navy Camp Lejeune, North Carolina II MEF Operations Center Replacement (Inc) 20,000 20,000 Spain Navy Rota MH–60r Squadron Support Facilities 60,110 60,110 Virginia Navy Norfolk E–2D Training Facility 30,400 30,400 Navy Norfolk MH60 & CMV–22B Corrosion Control & Paint Fac 17,671 17,671 Worldwide Unspecified Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning & Design 165,710 160,710 Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning & Design—Indo-Pacific Command Posture Initiatives 0 5,000 Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 38,983 38,983 Military Construction, Navy Total 1,975,606 1,676,514 California AF Edwards AFB Flight Test Engineering Laboratory Complex 0 40,000 Colorado AF Schriever AFB Consolidated Space Operations Facility, Inc 2 88,000 88,000 Florida AF Eglin Advanced Munitions Technology Complex 0 35,000 Guam AF Joint Region Marianas Stand Off Weapons Complex, MSA 2 56,000 56,000 Illinois AF Scott Add/Alter Consolidated Communications Facility 0 3,000 Mariana Islands AF Tinian Airfield Development Phase 1, Inc 2 20,000 0 AF Tinian Fuel Tanks With Pipeline & Hydrant Sys, Inc 2 7,000 0 AF Tinian Parking Apron, Inc 2 15,000 0 Maryland AF Joint Base Andrews Consolidated Communications Center 0 13,000 Montana AF Malmstrom AFB Weapons Storage & Maintenance Facility, Inc 2 25,000 0 New Jersey AF Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst Munitions Storage Area 22,000 22,000 Qatar AF Al Udeid, Qatar Cargo Marshalling Yard 26,000 26,000 Texas AF Joint Base San Antonio BMT Recruit Dormitory 8, Inc 2 36,000 36,000 AF Joint Base San Antonio T-X ADAL Ground Based Trng Sys Sim 19,500 19,500 Utah AF Hill AFB GBSD Mission Integration Facility, Inc 2 68,000 68,000 Virginia AF Joint Base Langley-Eustis Access Control Point Main Gate With Land Acq 19,500 19,500 Worldwide Unspecified AF Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning & Design 296,532 149,649 AF Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning & Design—Indo-Pacific Command Posture Initiatives 0 5,000 AF Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 68,600 68,600 Wyoming AF FE Warren Weapons Storage Facility 0 12,000 Military Construction, Air Force Total 767,132 661,249 Alabama Def-Wide Anniston Army Depot Demilitarization Facility 18,000 18,000 Def-Wide Fort Rucker Construct 10mw Generation & Microgrid 0 24,000 Alaska Def-Wide Fort Greely Communications Center 48,000 48,000 Arizona Def-Wide Fort Huachuca Laboratory Building 33,728 33,728 Def-Wide Yuma SOF Hangar 49,500 49,500 Arkansas Def-Wide Fort Smith ANG PV Arrays and Battery Storage 0 2,600 California Def-Wide Beale AFB Bulk Fuel Tank 22,800 22,800 Def-Wide Marine Corps Air Combat Center / Twenty Nine Palms Install 10 Mw Battery Energy Storage for Various Buildings 11,646 11,646 Def-Wide Military Ocean Terminal Military Oceal Terminal Concord Microgrid 29,000 29,000 Def-Wide NAWS China Lake Solar Energy Storage System 0 8,950 Def-Wide NSA Monterey Cogeneration Plant at B236 10,540 10,540 Colorado Def-Wide Fort Carson, Colorado SOF Tactical Equipment Maintenance Facility 15,600 15,600 Conus Unspecified Def-Wide Conus Unspecified Training Target Structure 14,400 14,400 District of Columbia Def-Wide Joint Base Anacostia Bolling Industrial Controls System Modernization 0 8,749 Def-Wide Joint Base Anacostia Bolling Industrial Controls System Modernization 10,343 10,343 Def-Wide Joint Base Anacostia Bolling PV Carports 0 25,221 Florida Def-Wide Hurlburt Field SOF Combat Aircraft Parking Apron-North 38,310 38,310 Def-Wide Hurlburt Field SOF Special Tactics Ops Facility (23 STS) 44,810 44,810 Georgia Def-Wide Fort Benning Construct 4.8mw Generation & Microgrid 0 17,000 Germany Def-Wide Rhine Ordnance Barracks Medical Center Replacement Inc 9 200,000 200,000 Italy Def-Wide NSA Naples Smart Grid—NSA Naples 3,490 3,490 Japan Def-Wide Def Fuel Support Point Tsurumi Fuel Wharf 49,500 49,500 Def-Wide Yokosuka Kinnick High School Inc 30,000 0 Kentucky Def-Wide Fort Knox Van Voorhis Elementary School 69,310 69,310 Maryland Def-Wide Bethesda Naval Hospital MEDCEN Addition/Alteration Incr 4 180,000 100,000 Def-Wide Fort Meade NSAW Recapitalize Building #3 Inc 250,000 250,000 Def-Wide NSA Bethesda Nsab–16 Replace Chillers 3 Through 9 0 13,840 Def-Wide NSA South Potomac CBIRF/IHEODTD/Housing Potable Water 18,460 18,460 Missouri Def-Wide Fort Leonard Wood Hospital Replacement Inc 3 40,000 40,000 Def-Wide St Louis Next NGA West (N2W) Complex Phase 2 Inc 119,000 119,000 Def-Wide Whiteman AFB Install 10 Mw Combined Heat and Power Plant 17,310 17,310 Nevada Def-Wide Creech AFB Central Standby Generators 32,000 32,000 New Mexico Def-Wide Kirtland AFB Administrative Building 46,600 46,600 North Carolina Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Group Headquarters 53,100 53,100 Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Military Working Dog Facility 17,700 17,700 Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Operations Facility 43,000 43,000 Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOTF Chilled Water Upgrade 0 6,100 Ohio Def-Wide Wright-Patterson AFB Construct Intelligence Facility Central Utility Plant 0 35,000 Def-Wide Wright-Patterson AFB Hydrant Fuel System 23,500 23,500 Tennessee Def-Wide Memphis ANG PV Arrays and Battery Storage 0 4,780 Texas Def-Wide Fort Hood, Texas Fuel Facilities 32,700 32,700 Virginia Def-Wide Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek—Story SOF Dcs Operations Fac. and Command Center 54,500 54,500 Def-Wide Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek—Story SOF NSWG–2 Nswtg Css Facilities 58,000 58,000 Def-Wide Nmc Portsmouth / Portsmouth Retrofit Air Handling Units From Constant Volume Reheat to Variable Air Volume 611 611 Def-Wide Wallops Island Wallops Generation and Distribution Resiliency Improvements 9,100 9,100 Washington Def-Wide Joint Base Lewis-McChord Fuel Facilities (Lewis Main) 10,900 10,900 Def-Wide Joint Base Lewis-McChord Fuel Facilities (Lewis North) 10,900 10,900 Def-Wide Manchester Bulk Fuel Storage Tanks Phase 1 82,000 82,000 Worldwide Unspecified Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations ERCIP Design 14,250 24,250 Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Exercise Related Minor Construction 5,840 5,840 Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 48,696 48,696 Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 53,620 53,620 Def-Wide Various Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 97,030 97,030 Def-Wide Various Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 9,726 9,726 Military Construction, Defense-Wide Total 2,027,520 2,073,760 Worldwide Unspecified NATO NATO Security Investment Program NATO Security Investment Program 173,030 173,030 NATO Security Investment Program Total 173,030 173,030 Arizona Army NG Tucson National Guard Readiness Center 18,100 18,100 Colorado Army NG Peterson AFB National Guard Readiness Center 15,000 15,000 Indiana Army NG Shelbyville National Guard/Reserve Center Building Add/Al 12,000 12,000 Kentucky Army NG Frankfort National Guard/Reserve Center Building 15,000 15,000 Mississippi Army NG Brandon National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop 10,400 10,400 Nebraska Army NG North Platte National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop 9,300 9,300 New Jersey Army NG Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst National Guard Readiness Center 15,000 15,000 Ohio Army NG Columbus National Guard Readiness Center 15,000 15,000 Oregon Army NG Hermiston Enlisted Barracks, Transient Training 9,300 25,035 Puerto Rico Army NG Fort Allen National Guard Readiness Center 37,000 37,000 South Carolina Army NG Joint Base Charleston National Guard Readiness Center 15,000 15,000 Tennessee Army NG Mcminnville National Guard Readiness Center 11,200 11,200 Texas Army NG Fort Worth Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Addition/Alt 6,000 6,000 Army NG Fort Worth National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop 7,800 7,800 Utah Army NG Nephi National Guard Readiness Center 12,000 12,000 Virgin Islands Army NG St. Croix Army Aviation Support Facility (Aasf) 28,000 28,000 Army NG St. Croix CST Ready Building 11,400 11,400 Wisconsin Army NG Appleton National Guard Readiness Center Add/Alt 11,600 11,600 Worldwide Unspecified Army NG Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 29,593 29,593 Army NG Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 32,744 32,744 Military Construction, Army National Guard Total 321,437 337,172 Florida Army Res Gainesville ECS TEMF/Warehouse 36,000 36,000 Massachusetts Army Res Devens Reserve Forces Training Area Automated Multipurpose Machine Gun Range 8,700 8,700 North Carolina Army Res Asheville Army Reserve Center/Land 24,000 24,000 Wisconsin Army Res Fort McCoy Scout Reconnaissance Range 14,600 14,600 Army Res Fort McCoy Transient Trainee Barracks 0 2,500 Worldwide Unspecified Army Res Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 1,218 1,218 Army Res Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 3,819 3,819 Military Construction, Army Reserve Total 88,337 90,837 Maryland N/MC Res Reisterstown Reserve Training Center, Camp Fretterd, MD 39,500 39,500 Utah N/MC Res Hill AFB Naval Operational Support Center 25,010 25,010 Worldwide Unspecified N/MC Res Unspecified Worldwide Locations MCNR Minor Construction 3,000 3,000 N/MC Res Unspecified Worldwide Locations MCNR Planning & Design 3,485 3,485 Military Construction, Naval Reserve Total 70,995 70,995 Alabama Air NG Montgomery Regional Airport (ANG) Base F–35 Simulator Facility 11,600 11,600 Guam Air NG Joint Region Marianas Space Control Facility #5 20,000 20,000 Maryland Air NG Joint Base Andrews F–16 Mission Training Center 9,400 9,400 Texas Air NG Joint Base San Antonio F–16 Mission Training Center 10,800 10,800 Worldwide Unspecified Air NG Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 9,000 9,000 Air NG Various Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 3,414 3,414 Military Construction, Air National Guard Total 64,214 64,214 Texas AF Res Fort Worth F–35A Simulator Facility 14,200 14,200 Worldwide Unspecified AF Res Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning & Design 3,270 3,270 AF Res Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 5,647 5,647 Military Construction, Air Force Reserve Total 23,117 23,117 Italy FH Con Army Vicenza Family Housing New Construction 84,100 84,100 Kwajalein FH Con Army Kwajalein Atoll Family Housing Replacement Construction 32,000 32,000 Worldwide Unspecified FH Con Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Family Housing P & D 3,300 3,300 Family Housing Construction, Army Total 119,400 119,400 Worldwide Unspecified FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Furnishings 18,004 18,004 FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Housing Privitization Support 37,948 62,948 FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Leasing 123,841 123,841 FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Maintenance 97,789 97,789 FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Management 39,716 39,716 FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Miscellaneous 526 526 FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Services 8,135 8,135 FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Utilities 41,183 41,183 Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Army Total 367,142 392,142 Worldwide Unspecified FH Con Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations Construction Improvements 37,043 37,043 FH Con Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning & Design 3,128 3,128 FH Con Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations USMC DPRI/Guam Planning and Design 2,726 2,726 Family Housing Construction, Navy And Marine Corps Total 42,897 42,897 Worldwide Unspecified FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations Furnishings 17,977 17,977 FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations Housing Privatization Support 53,700 78,700 FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations Leasing 62,658 62,658 FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations Maintenance 85,630 110,630 FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations Management 51,006 51,006 FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations Miscellaneous 350 350 FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations Services 16,743 16,743 FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations Utilities 58,429 58,429 Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Navy And Marine Corps Total 346,493 396,493 Worldwide Unspecified FH Con AF Unspecified Worldwide Locations Construction Improvements 94,245 94,245 FH Con AF Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning & Design 2,969 2,969 Family Housing Construction, Air Force Total 97,214 97,214 Worldwide Unspecified FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Locations Furnishings 25,805 25,805 FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Locations Housing Privatization 23,175 23,175 FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Locations Leasing 9,318 9,318 FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Locations Maintenance 140,666 165,666 FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Locations Management 64,732 99,732 FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Locations Miscellaneous 2,184 2,184 FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Locations Services 7,968 7,968 FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Locations Utilities 43,173 43,173 Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Air Force Total 317,021 377,021 Worldwide Unspecified FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Locations Furnishings 727 727 FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Locations Leasing 49,856 49,856 FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Locations Maintenance 32 32 FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Locations Utilities 4,113 4,113 Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Defense-Wide Total 54,728 54,728 Worldwide Unspecified FHIF Unspecified Worldwide Locations Administrative Expenses—FHIF 5,897 5,897 DOD Family Housing Improvement Fund Total 5,897 5,897 Worldwide Unspecified UHIF Unspecified Worldwide Locations Administrative Expenses—UHIF 600 600 Unaccompanied Housing Improvement Fund Total 600 600 Worldwide Unspecified BRAC—Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations DOD BRAC Activities—Air Force 109,222 109,222 BRAC—Army Base Realignment & Closure, Army Base Realignment and Closure 66,060 106,060 BRAC—Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations Base Realignment & Closure 125,165 225,165 Base Realignment and Closure—Total 300,447 440,447 Total, Military Construction 7,813,563 7,813,563 4602. Military construction for overseas contingency operations SEC. 4602. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS Account State/Country and Installation Project Title FY 2021 House Worldwide Unspecified Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations EDI: Minor Construction 3,970 3,970 Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations EDI: Planning and Design 11,903 11,903 Military Construction, Army Total 15,873 15,873 Spain Navy Rota EDI: EOD Boat Shop 31,760 31,760 Navy Rota EDI: Expeditionary Maintenance Facility 27,470 27,470 Worldwide Unspecified Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning & Design 10,790 10,790 Military Construction, Navy Total 70,020 70,020 Germany AF Ramstein EDI: Rapid Airfield Damage Repair Storage 36,345 36,345 AF Spangdahlem AB EDI: Rapid Airfield Damage Repair Storage 25,824 25,824 Romania AF Campia Turzii EDI: Dangerous Cargo Pad 11,000 11,000 AF Campia Turzii EDI: ECAOS DABS-FEV Storage Complex 68,000 68,000 AF Campia Turzii EDI: Parking Apron 19,500 19,500 AF Campia Turzii EDI: POL Increase Capacity 32,000 32,000 Worldwide Unspecified AF Unspecified Worldwide Locations EDI: Unspecified Minor Military Construction 16,400 16,400 AF Various Worldwide Locations EDI: Planning & Design 54,800 54,800 Military Construction, Air Force Total 263,869 263,869 Total, Military Construction 349,762 349,762 XLVII Department of Energy National Security Programs 4701. Department of energy national security programs SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS Program FY 2021 House Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Nuclear Energy 137,800 137,800 Atomic Energy Defense Activities National nuclear security administration: Weapons activities 15,602,000 15,602,000 Defense nuclear nonproliferation 2,031,000 2,111,000 Naval reactors 1,684,000 1,684,000 Federal salaries and expenses 454,000 454,000 Total, National nuclear security administration 19,771,000 19,851,000 Environmental and other defense activities: Defense environmental cleanup 4,983,608 5,773,708 Other defense activities 1,054,727 899,289 Total, Environmental & other defense activities 6,038,335 6,672,997 Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities 25,809,335 26,523,997 Total, Discretionary Funding 25,947,135 26,661,797 Nuclear Energy Idaho sitewide safeguards and security 137,800 137,800 Total, Nuclear Energy 137,800 137,800 Stockpile Management Stockpile Major Modernization B61–12 Life extension program 815,710 815,710 W88 Alt 370 256,922 256,922 W80–4 Life extension program 1,000,314 1,000,314 W87–1 Modification Program 541,000 541,000 W93 53,000 53,000 Total, Stockpile Major Modernization 2,666,946 2,666,946 Stockpile services Production Operations 568,941 568,941 Stockpile Sustainment 998,357 998,357 Weapons Dismantlement and Disposition 50,000 50,000 Subtotal, Stockpile Services 1,617,298 1,617,298 Total, Stockpile Management 4,284,244 4,284,244 Weapons Activities Production Modernization Primary Capability Modernization Plutonium Modernization Los Alamos Plutonium Modernization Los Alamos Plutonium Operations 610,599 610,599 21–D–512 Plutonium Pit Production Project, LANL 226,000 226,000 Subtotal, Los Alamos Plutonium Modernization 836,599 836,599 Savannah River Plutonium Modernization Savannah River Plutonium Operations 200,000 200,000 21–D–511 Savannah River Plutonium Processing Facility, SRS 241,896 241,896 Subtotal, Savannah River Plutonium Modernization 441,896 441,896 Enterprise Plutonium Support 90,782 90,782 Total, Plutonium Modernization 1,369,277 1,369,277 High Explosives and Energetics 67,370 67,370 Total, Primary Capability Modernization 1,436,647 1,436,647 Secondary Capability Modernization 457,004 457,004 Tritium and Domestic Uranium Enrichment 457,112 457,112 Non-Nuclear Capability Modernization 107,137 107,137 Total, Production Modernization 2,457,900 2,457,900 Stockpile Research, Technology, and Engineering Assessment Science 773,111 773,111 Engineering and Integrated Assessments 337,404 337,404 Inertial Confinement Fusion 554,725 554,725 Advanced Simulation and Computing 732,014 732,014 Weapon Technology and Manufacturing Maturation 297,965 297,965 Academic Programs 86,912 86,912 Total, Stockpile Research, Technology, and Engineering 2,782,131 2,782,131 Infrastructure and Operations Operations of facilities 1,014,000 1,014,000 Safety and environmental operations 165,354 165,354 Maintenance and repair of facilities 792,000 792,000 Recapitalization: Infrastructure and safety 670,000 670,000 Capability based investments 149,117 149,117 Planning for Programmatic Construction (Pre-CD–1) 84,787 84,787 Total, Recapitalization 903,904 903,904 Construction: 21–D–510 HE Synthesis, Formulation, and Production, PX 31,000 31,000 19–D–670 138kV Power Transmission System Replacement, NNSS 59,000 59,000 18–D–690 Lithium Processing Facility, Y–12 109,405 109,405 18–D–620 Exascale Computing Facility Modernization Project, LLNL 29,200 29,200 18–D–650 Tritium Finishing Facility, SRS 27,000 27,000 17–D–640, U1a Complex Enhancements Project, NNSS 160,600 160,600 15–D–612 Emergency Operations Center, LLNL 27,000 27,000 15–D–611 Emergency Operations Center, SNL 36,000 36,000 15–D–302, TA–55 Reinvestments Project, Phase 3, LANL 30,000 30,000 15–D–301, HE Science & Engineering Facility, PX 43,000 43,000 07–D–220-04 Transuranic Liquid Waste Facility, LANL 36,687 36,687 06–D–141 Uranium processing facility Y–12, Oak Ridge, TN 750,000 750,000 04–D–125 Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement Project, LANL 169,427 169,427 Total, Construction 1,508,319 1,508,319 Total, Infrastructure and operations 4,383,577 4,383,577 Secure transportation asset Operations and equipment 266,390 266,390 Program direction 123,684 123,684 Total, Secure transportation asset 390,074 390,074 Defense Nuclear Security Operations and maintenance 815,895 815,895 Construction: 17–D–710 West end protected area reduction project, Y–12 11,000 11,000 Total, Defense nuclear security 826,895 826,895 Information technology and cybersecurity 375,511 375,511 Legacy contractor pensions 101,668 101,668 Total, Weapons Activities 15,602,000 15,602,000 Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs Global material security International nuclear security 66,391 66,391 Domestic radiological security 101,000 131,000 Container breach in Seattle, WA [30,000] International radiological security 73,340 73,340 Nuclear smuggling detection and deterrence 159,749 159,749 Total, Global material security 400,480 430,480 Material management and minimization HEU reactor conversion 170,000 170,000 Nuclear material removal 40,000 40,000 Material disposition 190,711 190,711 Total, Material management & minimization 400,711 400,711 Nonproliferation and arms control 138,708 138,708 National Technical Nuclear Forensics R&D 40,000 40,000 Defense nuclear nonproliferation R&D Proliferation Detection 235,220 265,220 Nuclear verification and detection, next-gen technologies [30,000] Nuclear Detonation Detection 236,531 236,531 Nonproliferation Stewardship Program 59,900 59,900 LEU Research and Development 0 20,000 LEU R&D for Naval Pressurized Water Reactors [20,000] Total, Defense nuclear nonproliferation R&D 531,651 581,651 Nonproliferation Construction: 18–D–150 Surplus Plutonium Disposition Project, SRS 148,589 148,589 Total, Nonproliferation construction 148,589 148,589 Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs 1,660,139 1,740,139 Legacy contractor pensions 14,348 14,348 Nuclear counterterrorism and incident response program 377,513 377,513 Use of Prior Year Balances –21,000 –21,000 Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 2,031,000 2,111,000 Naval Reactors Naval reactors development 590,306 590,306 Columbia-Class reactor systems development 64,700 64,700 S8G Prototype refueling 135,000 135,000 Naval reactors operations and infrastructure 506,294 506,294 Construction: 21–D–530 KL Steam and Condensate Upgrades 4,000 4,000 14–D–901 Spent fuel handling recapitalization project, NRF 330,000 330,000 Total, Construction 334,000 334,000 Program direction 53,700 53,700 Total, Naval Reactors 1,684,000 1,684,000 Federal Salaries And Expenses Program direction 454,000 454,000 Total, Office Of The Administrator 454,000 454,000 Defense Environmental Cleanup Closure sites: Closure sites administration 4,987 4,987 Richland: River corridor and other cleanup operations 54,949 235,949 Program restoration [181,000] Central plateau remediation 498,335 658,335 Program restoration [160,000] Richland community and regulatory support 2,500 10,100 Program restoration [7,600] Total, Hanford site 555,784 904,384 Office of River Protection: Waste Treatment Immobilization Plant Commissioning 50,000 50,000 Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition 597,757 597,757 Tank farm activities 0 180,000 Program restoration [180,000] Construction: 18–D–16 Waste treatment and immobilization plant—LBL/Direct feed LAW 609,924 779,924 Program restoration [170,000] Total, Construction 609,924 779,924 Total, Office of River Protection 1,257,681 1,607,681 Idaho National Laboratory: Idaho cleanup and waste disposition 257,554 257,554 Idaho community and regulatory support 2,400 2,400 Total, Idaho National Laboratory 259,954 259,954 NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 1,764 1,764 Nuclear facility D & D Separations Process Research Unit 15,000 15,000 Nevada 60,737 60,737 Sandia National Laboratories 4,860 4,860 Los Alamos National Laboratory 120,000 165,000 Program increase [45,000] Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites 202,361 247,361 Oak Ridge Reservation: OR Nuclear facility D & D 109,077 109,077 Total, OR Nuclear facility D & D 109,077 109,077 U233 Disposition Program 45,000 45,000 OR cleanup and disposition 58,000 58,000 Construction: 17–D–401 On-site waste disposal facility 22,380 22,380 14–D–403 Outfall 200 Mercury Treatment Facility 20,500 20,500 Total, Construction 42,880 42,880 Total, OR cleanup and waste disposition 145,880 145,880 OR community & regulatory support 4,930 4,930 OR technology development and deployment 3,000 3,000 Total, Oak Ridge Reservation 262,887 262,887 Savannah River Sites: Savannah River risk management operations Savannah River risk management operations 455,122 495,122 H-Canyon not placed into stand-by condition [40,000] Total, risk management operations 455,122 495,122 SR community and regulatory support 4,989 11,489 Secure payment in lieu of taxes funding [6,500] Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition 970,332 970,332 Construction: 20-D–402 Advanced Manufacturing Collaborative Facility (AMC) 25,000 25,000 18–D–402 Saltstone Disposal Unit #8/9 65,500 65,500 17–D–402 Saltstone Disposal Unit #7 10,716 10,716 Total, Construction 101,216 101,216 Total, Savannah River site 1,531,659 1,578,159 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Waste Isolation Pilot Plant 323,260 323,260 Construction: 15–D–412 Utility Saft 50,000 50,000 21–D–401 Hoisting Capability Project 10,000 10,000 Total, Construction 60,000 60,000 Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant 383,260 383,260 Program direction 275,285 275,285 Program support 12,979 12,979 Technology development 25,000 25,000 Safeguards and Security Safeguards and Security 320,771 320,771 Total, Safeguards and Security 320,771 320,771 Prior year balances credited –109,000 –109,000 Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup 4,983,608 5,773,708 Other Defense Activities Environment, health, safety and security Environment, health, safety and security 134,320 134,320 Program direction 75,368 75,368 Total, Environment, Health, safety and security 209,688 209,688 Independent enterprise assessments Independent enterprise assessments 26,949 26,949 Program direction 54,635 54,635 Total, Independent enterprise assessments 81,584 81,584 Specialized security activities 258,411 258,411 Office of Legacy Management Legacy management 293,873 138,435 Rejection of proposed transfer [–155,438] Program direction 23,120 23,120 Total, Office of Legacy Management 316,993 161,555 Defense related administrative support 183,789 183,789 Office of hearings and appeals 4,262 4,262 Subtotal, Other defense activities 1,054,727 899,289 Total, Other Defense Activities 1,054,727 899,289 E National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 5001. Short title This division may be cited as the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 5002. Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Artificial intelligence is a tool that has the potential to change and possibly transform every sector of the United States economy and society. (2) The Federal Government should continue to play an important role advancing research, development, standards, and education activities in artificial intelligence through coordination and collaboration between government, academia, and the private sector to leverage the intellectual, physical, and digital resources of each stakeholder. (3) The Federal Government lacks clear understanding of the capabilities of artificial intelligence and its potential to affect various social and economic sectors, including ethical concerns, national security implications, and workforce impacts. (4) Researchers from academia, Federal laboratories, and much of the private sector have limited access to many high-quality datasets, computing resources, or real-world testing environments to design and deploy safe and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems. (5) There is a lack of standards and benchmarking for artificial intelligence systems that academia and the public and private sectors can use to evaluate the performance of these systems before and after deployment. (6) Artificial intelligence is increasingly becoming a highly interdisciplinary field with expertise required from a diverse range of scientific and other scholarly disciplines that traditionally work independently and continue to face cultural and institutional barriers to large scale collaboration. (7) Current Federal investments and funding mechanisms are largely insufficient to incentivize and support the large-scale interdisciplinary and public-private collaborations that will be required to advance trustworthy artificial intelligence systems in the United States. (8) The United States education pipeline for artificial intelligence fields faces significant challenges. Not only does the artificial intelligence research field lack the gender and racial diversity of the American population as a whole, but it is failing to both retain researchers and adequately support educators to meet the demands of the next generation of students studying artificial intelligence. (9) In order to help drive forward advances in trustworthy artificial intelligence across all sectors and to the benefit of all Americans, the Federal Government must provide sufficient resources and use its convening power to facilitate the growth of artificial intelligence human capital, research, and innovation capacity in academia and other nonprofit research organizations, companies of all sizes and across all sectors, and within the Federal Government. 5003. Definitions In this division: (1) Advisory Committee The term Advisory Committee (2) Agency head The term agency head (3) Artificial intelligence The term artificial intelligence (A) perceive real and virtual environments; (B) abstract such perceptions into models through analysis in an automated manner; and (C) use model inference to formulate options for information or action. (4) Initiative The term Initiative (5) Initiative Office The term Initiative Office (6) Institute The term Institute (7) Interagency Committee The term Interagency Committee (8) K-12 The term K-12 education 20 U.S.C. 7801 (9) Machine learning The term machine learning I National Artificial Intelligence Initiative 5101. National Artificial Intelligence Initiative (a) Establishment; purposes The President shall establish and implement an initiative to be known as the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative (1) ensure continued United States leadership in artificial intelligence research and development; (2) lead the world in the development and use of trustworthy artificial intelligence systems in the public and private sectors; (3) maximize the benefits of artificial intelligence systems for all American people; and (4) prepare the present and future United States workforce for the integration of artificial intelligence systems across all sectors of the economy and society. (b) Initiative activities In carrying out the Initiative, the President, acting through the Initiative Office, the Interagency Committee, and agency heads as the President considers appropriate, shall carry out activities that include the following: (1) Sustained, consistent, and coordinated support for artificial intelligence research and development through grants, cooperative agreements, testbeds, and access to data and computing resources. (2) Support for the development of voluntary standards, best practices, and benchmarks for the development and use of trustworthy artificial intelligence systems. (3) Support for educational programs at all levels, in both formal and informal learning environments, to prepare the American workforce and the general public to be able to use and interact with artificial intelligence systems, as well as adapt to the potentially transformative impact of artificial intelligence on society and the economy. (4) Support for interdisciplinary research, education, and training programs for students and researchers that promote learning in the methods and systems used in artificial intelligence and foster interdisciplinary perspectives and collaborations among subject matter experts in relevant fields, including computer science, mathematics, statistics, engineering, social sciences, psychology, behavioral science, ethics, security, legal scholarship, and other disciplines that will be necessary to advance artificial intelligence research and development responsibly. (5) Support for partnerships to leverage knowledge, computing resources, access to open datasets, and other resources from industry, government, nonprofit organizations, Federal laboratories, State programs, and institutions of higher education to advance activities under the Initiative. (6) Interagency planning and coordination of Federal artificial intelligence research, development, demonstration, standards engagement, and other activities under the Initiative. (7) Establish the public sector infrastructure and artificial intelligence capabilities necessary to respond to pressing national challenges, including economic and public health emergencies such as pandemics. (8) Outreach to diverse stakeholders, including citizen groups and industry, to ensure public input is taken into account in the activities of the Initiative. (9) Leveraging existing Federal investments to advance objectives of the Initiative. (10) Support for a network of interdisciplinary artificial intelligence research institutes, as described in section 5201(b)(7)(B). (11) Support opportunities for international cooperation with strategic allies, as appropriate, on the research and development, assessment, and resources for trustworthy artificial intelligence systems and the development of voluntary consensus standards for those systems. 5102. National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Office (a) In general The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall establish or designate, and appoint a director of, an office to be known as the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Office (b) Responsibilities The Director of the Initiative Office shall— (1) provide technical and administrative support to the Interagency Committee and the Advisory Committee; (2) serve as the point of contact on Federal artificial intelligence activities for Federal departments and agencies, industry, academia, nonprofit organizations, professional societies, State governments, and such other persons as the Initiative Office considers appropriate to exchange technical and programmatic information; (3) conduct regular public outreach to diverse stakeholders, including through the convening of conferences and educational events, the publication of information about significant Initiative activities on a publicly available website, and the dissemination of findings and recommendations of the Advisory Committee, as appropriate; and (4) promote access to and early adoption of the technologies, innovations, lessons learned, and expertise derived from Initiative activities to agency missions and systems across the Federal Government, and to industry, including startup companies. (c) Funding estimate The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall develop an estimate of the funds necessary to carry out the activities of the Initiative Coordination Office, including an estimate of how much each participating Federal department and agency described in section 5103(c) will contribute to such funds, and submit such estimate to Congress not later than 90 days after the enactment of this Act. The Director shall update this estimate each year based on participating agency investments in artificial intelligence. 5103. Coordination by Interagency Committee (a) Interagency committee The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, acting through the National Science and Technology Council, shall establish or designate an Interagency Committee to coordinate Federal programs and activities in support of the Initiative. (b) Co-Chairs The Interagency Committee shall be co-chaired by the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy and, on an annual rotating basis, a representative from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the National Science Foundation, or the Department of Energy, as selected by the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy. (c) Agency participation The Committee shall include representatives from— (1) the National Institute of Standards and Technology; (2) the National Science Foundation; (3) the Department of Energy; (4) the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; (5) the Department of Defense; (6) the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; (7) the Department of Commerce; (8) the Office of the Director of National Intelligence; (9) the Office of Management and Budget; (10) the Office of Science and Technology Policy; (11) the Department of Health and Human Services; (12) the Department of Education; (13) the Department of Labor; (14) the Department of the Treasury; (15) the General Services Administration; (16) the Department of Transportation; (17) the Department of State; (18) the Department of Veterans Affairs; and (19) any other Federal agency as considered appropriate by the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy. (d) Responsibilities The Interagency Committee shall— (1) provide for interagency coordination of Federal artificial intelligence research, development, and demonstration activities, development of voluntary consensus standards and guidelines for research, development, testing, and adoption of ethically developed, safe, and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems, and education and training activities and programs of Federal departments and agencies undertaken pursuant to the Initiative; (2) not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, develop a strategic plan for artificial intelligence (to be updated not less than every 3 years) that— (A) establishes goals, priorities, and metrics for guiding and evaluating the Initiative’s activities; and (B) describes how the agencies carrying out the Initiative will— (i) determine and prioritize areas of artificial intelligence research, development, and demonstration requiring Federal Government leadership and investment; (ii) support long-term funding for interdisciplinary artificial intelligence research, development, demonstration, education and public outreach activities; (iii) support research and other activities on ethical, legal, environmental, safety, security, and other appropriate societal issues related to artificial intelligence; (iv) provide or facilitate the availability of curated, standardized, secure, representative, and privacy-protected data sets for artificial intelligence research and development; (v) provide or facilitate the necessary computing, networking, and data facilities for artificial intelligence research and development; (vi) support and coordinate Federal education and workforce activities related to artificial intelligence; (vii) reduce barriers to transferring artificial intelligence systems from the laboratory into application for the benefit of society and United States competitiveness; (viii) support and coordinate the network of artificial intelligence research institutes described in section 5201(b)(7)(B); (ix) in consultation with the Council of Economic Advisers, measure and track the contributions of artificial intelligence to United States economic growth and other societal indicators; and (x) leverage the resources of the Initiative to respond to pressing national challenges, including economic and public health emergencies such as pandemics; (3) propose an annually coordinated interagency budget for the Initiative to the Office of Management and Budget that is intended to ensure that the balance of funding across the Initiative is sufficient to meet the goals and priorities established for the Initiative; and (4) in carrying out this section, take into consideration the recommendations of the Advisory Committee, existing reports on related topics, and the views of academic, State, industry, and other appropriate groups. (e) Annual report For each fiscal year beginning with fiscal year 2022, not later than 90 days after submission of the President’s annual budget request for such fiscal year, the Interagency Committee shall prepare and submit to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report that includes— (1) a summarized budget in support of the Initiative for such fiscal year and the preceding fiscal year, including a disaggregation of spending for each Federal agency participating in the Initiative and for the development and acquisition of any research facilities and instrumentation; and (2) an assessment of how Federal agencies are implementing the plan described in subsection (d)(2), and a description of those efforts. 5104. National Artificial Intelligence Advisory Committee (a) In general The Secretary of Energy shall, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, establish an advisory committee to be known as the National Artificial Intelligence Advisory Committee (b) Qualifications The Advisory Committee shall consist of members, appointed by the Secretary of Energy, who are representing broad and interdisciplinary expertise and perspectives, including from academic institutions, companies across diverse sectors, nonprofit and civil society entities, and Federal laboratories, that are qualified to provide advice and information on science and technology research, development, ethics, standards, education, technology transfer, commercial application, security, and economic competitiveness related to artificial intelligence. (c) Membership consideration In selecting the members of the Advisory Committee, the Secretary of Energy may seek and give consideration to recommendations from the Congress, industry, nonprofit organizations, the scientific community (including the National Academy of Sciences, scientific professional societies, and academic institutions), the defense community, and other appropriate organizations. (d) Duties The Advisory Committee shall advise the President and the Initiative Office on matters related to the Initiative, including recommendations related to— (1) the current state of United States competitiveness and leadership in artificial intelligence, including the scope and scale of United States investments in artificial intelligence research and development in the international context; (2) the progress made in implementing the Initiative, including a review of the degree to which the Initiative has achieved the goals under the metrics established by the Interagency Committee under section 5103(d)(2); (3) the state of the science around artificial intelligence, including progress towards artificial general intelligence; (4) the need to update the Initiative; (5) the balance of activities and funding across the Initiative; (6) whether the strategic plan developed or updated by the Interagency Committee established under section 5103(d)(2) is helping to maintain United States leadership in artificial intelligence; (7) the management, coordination, and activities of the Initiative; (8) whether ethical, legal, safety, security, and other appropriate societal issues are adequately addressed by the Initiative; and (9) opportunities for international cooperation with strategic allies on artificial intelligence research activities and standards development. (e) Reports Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and not less frequently than once every 3 years thereafter, the Advisory Committee shall submit to the President, the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, a report on the Advisory Committee’s findings and recommendations under subsection (d). (f) Travel expenses of non-Federal members Non-Federal members of the Advisory Committee, while attending meetings of the Advisory Committee or while otherwise serving at the request of the head of the Advisory Committee away from their homes or regular places of business, may be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized by section 5703 of title 5, United States Code, for individuals in the Government serving without pay. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prohibit members of the Advisory Committee who are officers or employees of the United States from being allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, in accordance with existing law. (g) FACA exemption The Secretary of Energy shall charter the Advisory Committee in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), except that the Advisory Committee shall be exempt from section 14 of such Act. 5105. National Academies artificial intelligence impact study on workforce (a) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the National Science Foundation shall enter into a contract with the National Research Council of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to conduct a study of the current and future impact of artificial intelligence on the workforce of the United States across sectors. (b) Contents The study shall address— (1) workforce impacts across sectors caused by the increased adoption of artificial intelligence, automation, and other related trends; (2) workforce needs and employment opportunities generated by the increased adoption of artificial intelligence across sectors; (3) research gaps and data needed to better understand and track both workforce impacts and workforce needs and opportunities generated by adoption of artificial intelligence systems across sectors; and (4) recommendations to address the challenges and opportunities described in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3). (c) Stakeholders In conducting the study, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine shall seek input from a wide range of stakeholders in the public and private sectors. (d) Report to Congress The contract entered into under subsection (a) shall require the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, to— (1) submit to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report containing the findings and recommendations of the study conducted under subsection (a); and (2) make a copy of such report available on a publicly accessible website. 5106. GAO report on computational needs (a) In general Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study of artificial intelligence computer hardware and computing required in order to maintain U.S. leadership in artificial intelligence research and development. The Comptroller General shall— (1) assess the composition of civilian computing resources supported by the Federal Government at universities and Federal Laboratories, including programs with laboratory computing, high performance computing, cloud computing, quantum computing, edge computing, and other computing resources; (2) evaluate projected needs for computing consumption and performance required by the public and private sector for the training, auditing, validation, testing, and use of artificial intelligence over the next five years; and (3) offer recommendations to meet these projected needs. 5107. National AI Research Resource Task Force (a) Establishment of task force (1) Establishment (A) In general The Director of the National Science Foundation, in coordination with the Office of Science and Technology Policy, shall establish a task force— (i) to investigate the feasibility and advisability of establishing and sustaining a national artificial intelligence research resource; and (ii) to propose a roadmap detailing how such resource should be established and sustained. (B) Designation The task force established by subparagraph (A) shall be known as the National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource Task Force Task Force (2) Membership (A) Composition The Task Force shall be composed of 12 members selected by the co-chairpersons of the Task Force from among technical experts in artificial intelligence or related subjects, of whom— (i) 4 shall be representatives from the Interagency Committee established in section 5103, including the co-chairpersons of the Task Force; (ii) 4 shall be representatives from institutions of higher education (as such term is defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 1001 (iii) 4 shall be representatives from private organizations. (B) Appointment Not later than 120 days after enactment of this Act, the co-chairpersons of the Task Force shall appoint members to the Task Force pursuant to subparagraph (A). (C) Term of appointment Members of the Task Force shall be appointed for the life of the Task Force. (D) Vacancy Any vacancy occurring in the membership of the Task Force shall be filled in the same manner in which the original appointment was made. (E) Co-chairpersons The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy and the Director of the National Sciences Foundation, or their designees, shall be the co-chairpersons of the Task Force. If the role of the Director of the National Science Foundation is vacant, the Chair of the National Science Board shall act as a co-chairperson of the Task Force. (F) Expenses for non-federal members Non-Federal Members of the Task Force shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for employees under subchapter I of chapter 57 (b) Roadmap and implementation plan (1) In general The Task Force shall develop a coordinated roadmap and implementation plan for creating and sustaining a National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource. (2) Contents The roadmap and plan required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) Goals for establishment and sustainment of a national artificial intelligence research resource and metrics for success. (B) A plan for ownership and administration of the National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource, including— (i) an appropriate agency or organization responsible for the implementation, deployment, and administration of the Resource; and (ii) a governance structure for the resource, including oversight and decision-making authorities. (C) A model for governance and oversight to establish strategic direction, make programmatic decisions, and manage the allocation of resources; (D) Capabilities required to create and maintain a shared computing infrastructure to facilitate access to computing resources for researchers across the country, including scalability, secured access control, resident data engineering and curation expertise, provision of curated, data sets, compute resources, educational tools and services, and a user interface portal. (E) An assessment of, and recommend solutions to, barriers to the dissemination and use of high-quality government data sets as part of the national artificial intelligence research resource. (F) An assessment of security requirements associated with the national artificial intelligence research resource and its research and recommend a framework for the management of access controls. (G) An assessment of privacy and civil liberties requirements associated with the national artificial intelligence research resource and its research. (H) A plan for sustaining the resources, including through Federal funding and partnerships with the private sector. (I) The parameters for the establishment and sustainment of the national artificial intelligence resource, including agency roles and responsibilities and milestones to implement the resource. (c) Consultations In conducting its duties required under subsection (b), the Task Force shall consult with the following: (1) The National Science Foundation. (2) The Office of Science and Technology Policy. (3) The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (4) The National Institute of Standards and Technology. (5) The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. (6) The Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity. (7) The Department of Energy. (8) The Department of Defense. (9) The General Services Administration. (10) Private industry. (11) Institutions of higher education. (12) Such other persons as the Task Force considers appropriate. (d) Staff Staff of the Task Force shall comprise detailees with expertise in artificial intelligence, or related fields from the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the National Science Foundation, or any other agency the co-chairs deem appropriate, with the consent of the head of the agency. The co-chairs shall also be authorized to hire staff from outside the Federal government for the duration of the task force. (e) Task force reports (1) Initial report Not later than 12 months after the date on which all of the appointments have been made under subsection (a)(2)(B), the Task Force shall submit to Congress and the President an interim report containing the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Task Force. The report shall include specific recommendations regarding steps the Task Force believes necessary for the establishment and sustainment of a national artificial intelligence research resource. (2) Final report Taking into account the findings of the Government Accountability Office report required in section 106 of this Act, not later than 6 months after the submittal of the interim report under paragraph (1), the Task Force shall submit to Congress and the President a final report containing the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Task Force, including the specific recommendations required by subsection (b). (f) Termination (1) In general The Task Force shall terminate 90 days after the date on which it submits the final report under subsection (e)(2). (2) Records Upon termination of the Task Force, all of its records shall become the records of the National Archives and Records Administration. (g) Definitions In this section: (1) National artificial intelligence research resource and resource The terms National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource Resource (2) Ownership The term ownership 5108. Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) artificial intelligence systems have the potential to transform every sector of the United States economy, boosting productivity, enhancing scientific research, and increasing U.S. competitiveness; and (2) the United States Government should use this Initiative to enable the benefits of trustworthy artificial intelligence while preventing the creation and use of artificial intelligence systems that behave in ways that cause harm, including— (A) high-risk systems that lack sufficient robustness to prevent adversarial attacks; (B) high-risk systems that harm the privacy or security of users or the general public; and (C) artificial general intelligence systems that may become self-aware or uncontrollable. II National Artificial Intelligence Research Institutes 5201. National Artificial Intelligence Research Institutes (a) In general As part of the Initiative, the Director of the National Science Foundation shall establish a program to award financial assistance for the planning, establishment, and support of Institutes (as described in subsection (b)(2)) in accordance with this section. (b) Financial assistance To establish and support national artificial intelligence research institutes (1) In general Under the Initiative, the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of Commerce, the Director of the National Science Foundation, and every other agency head may award financial assistance to an eligible entity, or consortia thereof, as determined by an agency head, to establish and support an Institute. (2) Artificial intelligence institutes An Institute described in this subsection is an artificial intelligence research institute that— (A) is focused on— (i) a particular economic or social sector, including health, education, manufacturing, agriculture, security, energy, and environment, and includes a component that addresses the ethical, societal, safety, and security implications relevant to the application of artificial intelligence in that sector; or (ii) a cross-cutting challenge for artificial intelligence systems, including trustworthiness, or foundational science; (B) requires partnership among public and private organizations, including, as appropriate, Federal agencies, research universities, community colleges, nonprofit research organizations, Federal laboratories, State, local, and tribal governments, and industry (or consortia thereof); (C) has the potential to create an innovation ecosystem, or enhance existing ecosystems, to translate Institute research into applications and products, as appropriate to the topic of each Institute; (D) supports interdisciplinary research and development across multiple institutions and organizations involved in artificial intelligence research and related disciplines, including physics, engineering, mathematical sciences, computer and information science, robotics, biological and cognitive sciences, material science, social and behavioral sciences, cybersecurity, and technology ethics; (E) supports interdisciplinary education activities, including curriculum development, research experiences, and faculty professional development across two-year, undergraduates, masters, and doctoral level programs; and (F) supports workforce development in artificial intelligence related disciplines in the United States, including broadening participation of underrepresented communities. (3) Use of funds Financial assistance awarded under paragraph (1) may be used by an Institute for— (A) managing and making available to researchers accessible, curated, standardized, secure, and privacy protected data sets from the public and private sectors for the purposes of training and testing artificial intelligence systems and for research using artificial intelligence systems, pursuant to section 5301(b) and 5301(c); (B) developing and managing testbeds for artificial intelligence systems, including sector-specific test beds, designed to enable users to evaluate artificial intelligence systems prior to deployment; (C) conducting research and education activities involving artificial intelligence systems to solve challenges with social, economic, health, scientific, and national security implications; (D) providing or brokering access to computing resources, networking, and data facilities for artificial intelligence research and development relevant to the Institute’s research goals; (E) providing technical assistance to users, including software engineering support, for artificial intelligence research and development relevant to the Institute’s research goals; (F) engaging in outreach and engagement to broaden participation in artificial intelligence research and workforce; and (G) such other activities that an agency head, whose agency’s missions contribute to or are affected by artificial intelligence, considers consistent with the purposes described in section 5101(a). (4) Duration (A) Initial periods An award of financial assistance under paragraph (1) shall be awarded for an initial period of 5 years. (B) Extension An established Institute may apply for, and the agency head may grant, extended funding for periods of 5 years on a merit-reviewed basis using the merit review criteria of the sponsoring agency. (5) Application for financial assistance (A) In general A person or group of persons seeking financial assistance under paragraph (1) shall submit to an agency head an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the agency head may require. (B) Requirements An application submitted under subparagraph (A) for an Institute shall, at a minimum, include the following: (i) A plan for the Institute to include— (I) the proposed goals and activities of the Institute; (II) how the Institute will form partnerships with other research institutions, industry, and nonprofits to leverage expertise in artificial intelligence and access to data, including non-governmental data and computing resources; (III) how the institute will support long-term and short-term education and workforce development in artificial intelligence, including broadening participation of underrepresented communities; and (IV) a plan for how the Institute will transition from planning into operations. (ii) A description of the anticipated sources and nature of any non-Federal contributions, including privately held data sets, computing resources, and other types of in-kind support. (iii) A description of the anticipated long-term impact of such Institute. (6) Competitive, merit review In awarding financial assistance under paragraph (1), the agency head shall— (A) use a competitive, merit review process that includes peer review by a diverse group of individuals with relevant expertise from both the private and public sectors; and (B) ensure the focus areas of the Institute do not substantially duplicate the efforts of any other Institute. (7) Collaboration (A) In general In awarding financial assistance under paragraph (1), an agency head may collaborate with Federal departments and agencies whose missions contribute to or are affected by artificial intelligence systems, including the agencies outlined in section 5103(c). (B) Coordinating network The Director of the National Science Foundation shall establish a network of Institutes receiving financial assistance under this subsection, to be known as the Artificial Intelligence Leadership Network (C) Funding The head of an agency may request, accept, and provide funds from other Federal departments and agencies, State, United States territory, local, or tribal government agencies, private sector for-profit entities, and nonprofit entities, to be available to the extent provided by appropriations Acts, to support an Institute’s activities. The head of an agency may not give any special consideration to any agency or entity in return for a donation. III National Institute of Standards and Technology Artificial Intelligence Activities 5301. National Institute of Standards and Technology activities (a) In general As part of the Initiative, the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall— (1) support measurement research and development of best practices and voluntary standards for trustworthy artificial intelligence systems, including for— (A) privacy and security, including for datasets used to train or test artificial intelligence systems and software and hardware used in artificial intelligence systems; (B) advanced computer chips and hardware designed for artificial intelligence systems; (C) data management and techniques to increase the usability of data, including strategies to systematically clean, label, and standardize data into forms useful for training artificial intelligence systems and the use of common, open licenses; (D) safety and robustness of artificial intelligence systems, including assurance, verification, validation, security, control, and the ability for artificial intelligence systems to withstand unexpected inputs and adversarial attacks; (E) auditing mechanisms and benchmarks for accuracy, transparency, verifiability, and safety assurance for artificial intelligence systems; (F) applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence systems to improve other scientific fields and engineering; (G) model documentation, including performance metrics and constraints, measures of fairness, training and testing processes, and results; (H) system documentation, including connections and dependences within and between systems, and complications that may arise from such connections; and (I) all other areas deemed by the Director to be critical to the development and deployment of trustworthy artificial intelligence; (2) produce curated, standardized, representative, secure, and privacy protected data sets for artificial intelligence research, development, and use, prioritizing data for high-value, high-risk research; (3) support one or more institutes as described in section 5201(a) for the purpose of advancing the field of artificial intelligence; (4) support and strategically engage in the development of voluntary consensus standards, including international standards, through open, transparent, and consensus-based processes; (5) taking into account the findings from the National Academies study in section 5105, develop taxonomies and lexica to describe artificial intelligence tasks, knowledge, skills, abilities, competencies, and work roles to guide career development, education, and training activities in industry, academia, nonprofit organizations, and the Federal government, identify workforce gaps in the public and private sector, and create criteria and measurement for credentials in artificial intelligence-related careers; and (6) enter into and perform such contracts, including cooperative research and development arrangements and grants and cooperative agreements or other transactions, as may be necessary in the conduct of the work of the National Institute of Standards and Technology and on such terms as the Director considers appropriate, in furtherance of the purposes of this division. (b) Risk management framework Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall work to develop, and periodically update, in collaboration with other public and private sector organizations, including the National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy, a voluntary risk management framework for the trustworthiness of artificial intelligence systems. The framework shall— (1) identify and provide standards, guidelines, best practices, methodologies, procedures, and processes for assessing the trustworthiness of, and mitigating risks to, artificial intelligence systems; (2) establish common definitions and characterizations for aspects and levels of trustworthiness, including explainability, transparency, safety, privacy, security, robustness, fairness, bias, ethics, validation, verification, interpretability, and other properties related to artificial intelligence systems that are common across all sectors; (3) provide guidance and implementation steps for risk management of artificial intelligence systems; (4) provide sector-specific case studies of implementation of the framework; (5) align with voluntary consensus standards, including international standards, to the fullest extent possible; (6) incorporate voluntary consensus standards and industry best practices; and (7) not prescribe or otherwise require— (A) the use of specific solutions; or (B) the use of specific information or communications technology products or services. (c) Data sharing and documentation best practices Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director shall, in collaboration with other public and private sector organizations, develop guidance to facilitate the creation of voluntary data sharing arrangements between industry, federally funded research centers, and Federal agencies for the purpose of advancing artificial intelligence research and technologies, including— (1) options for partnership models between government entities, industry, universities, and nonprofits that incentivize each party to share the data they collected; and (2) best practices for datasets used to train artificial intelligence systems, including— (A) standards for metadata that describe the properties of datasets, including— (i) the origins of the data; (ii) the intent behind the creation of the data; (iii) authorized uses of the data; (iv) descriptive characteristics of the data, including what populations are included and excluded from the datasets; and (v) any other properties as determined by the Director; and (B) standards for privacy and security of datasets with human characteristics. (d) Stakeholder outreach In carrying out the activities under this subsection, the Director shall— (1) solicit input from university researchers, private sector experts, relevant Federal agencies, Federal laboratories, State and local governments, civil society groups, and other relevant stakeholders; (2) solicit input from experts in relevant fields of social science, technology ethics, and law; and (3) provide opportunity for public comment on guidelines and best practices developed as part of the Initiative, as appropriate. IV National Science Foundation Artificial Intelligence Activities 5401. Artificial intelligence research and education (a) In general As part of the Initiative, the Director of the National Science Foundation shall fund research and education activities in artificial intelligence systems and related fields, including competitive awards or grants to institutions of higher education or eligible nonprofit organizations (or consortia thereof). (b) Uses of funds In carrying out the activities under subsection (a), the Director of the National Science Foundation shall— (1) support research, including interdisciplinary research on artificial intelligence systems and related areas; (2) support collaborations among researchers across disciplines, including between social scientists and computer and data scientists, to advance research critical to the development and deployment of trustworthy artificial intelligence systems, including support for interdisciplinary research relating advances in artificial intelligence to changes in the future workplace, in a social and economic context; (3) use the existing programs of the National Science Foundation, in collaboration with other Federal departments and agencies, as appropriate to— (A) improve the teaching and learning of artificial intelligence systems at all levels of education; and (B) increase participation in artificial intelligence related fields, including by individuals identified in sections 33 and 34 of the Science and Engineering Equal Opportunity Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1885a (4) engage with institutions of higher education, research communities, industry, Federal laboratories, nonprofit organizations, State and local governments, and potential users of information produced under this section, including through the convening of workshops and conferences, to leverage the collective body of knowledge across disciplines relevant to artificial intelligence, facilitate new collaborations and partnerships, and identify emerging research needs; (5) support partnerships among institutions of higher education and industry that facilitate collaborative research, personnel exchanges, and workforce development with respect to artificial intelligence systems; (6) ensure adequate access to research and education infrastructure with respect to artificial intelligence systems, including through the development of new computing resources and partnership with the private sector for the provision of cloud-based computing services; (7) conduct prize competitions, as appropriate, pursuant to section 24 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 ( 15 U.S.C. 3719 (8) coordinate research efforts funded through existing programs across the directorates of the National Science Foundation; (9) provide guidance on data sharing by grantees to public and private sector organizations consistent with the standards and guidelines developed under section 5301(c); and (10) evaluate opportunities for international collaboration with strategic allies on artificial intelligence research and development. (c) Artificial intelligence research grants (1) In general The Director shall award grants for research on artificial intelligence systems. Research areas may include— (A) artificial intelligence systems, including machine learning, computer vision, robotics, and hardware for accelerating artificial intelligence systems; (B) artificial intelligence-enabled systems; (C) fields and research areas that will contribute to the advancement of artificial intelligence systems, including information theory, causal and statistical inference, data mining, information extraction, human-robot interaction, and intelligent interfaces; (D) fields and research areas that increase understanding of human characteristics relevant to artificial intelligence systems, including computational neuroscience, reasoning and representation, speech and language, multi-agent systems, intelligent interfaces, human-artificial intelligence cooperation, and artificial intelligence-augmented human problem solving; (E) fields and research areas that increase understanding of learning, adaptability, and resilience beyond the human cognitive model, including topics in developmental biology, zoology, botany, morphological computation, and organismal systems; (F) fields and research areas that will contribute to the development and deployment of trustworthy artificial intelligence systems, including— (i) algorithmic explainability; (ii) methods to assess, characterize, and reduce bias in datasets and artificial intelligence systems; and (iii) safety and robustness of artificial intelligence systems, including assurance, verification, validation, security, and control; (G) privacy and security, including for datasets used for the training and inference of artificial intelligence systems, and software and hardware used in artificial intelligence systems; (H) fields and research areas that address the application of artificial intelligence systems to scientific discovery and societal challenges, including economic and public health emergencies; (I) societal, ethical, safety, education, workforce, and security implications of artificial intelligence systems, including social impact of artificial intelligence systems on different groups within society, especially historically marginalized groups; and (J) qualitative and quantitative forecasting of future capabilities, applications, and impacts. (2) Engineering support In soliciting proposals for funding under this section, the Director shall permit applicants to include in their proposed budgets funding for software engineering support to assist with the proposed research. (3) Ethics (A) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (i) a number of emerging areas of research, including artificial intelligence, have potential ethical, social, safety, and security implications that might be apparent as early as the basic research stage; (ii) the incorporation of ethical, social, safety, and security considerations into the research design and review process for Federal awards may help mitigate potential harms before they happen; (iii) the National Science Foundation’s intent to enter into an agreement with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to conduct a study and make recommendations with respect to governance of research in emerging technologies is a positive step toward accomplishing this goal; and (iv) the National Science Foundation should continue to work with stakeholders to understand and adopt policies that promote best practices for governance of research in emerging technologies at every stage of research. (B) Ethics statements (i) In general Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director shall amend grant proposal instructions to include a requirement for an ethics statement to be included as part of any proposal for funding prior to making the award. Such statement shall be considered by the Director in the review of proposals, taking into consideration any relevant input from the peer-reviewers for the proposal, and shall factor into award decisions as deemed necessary by the Director. (ii) Contents Such statements may include, as appropriate— (I) the potential societal benefits of the research; (II) any foreseeable or quantifiable risks to society, including how the research could enable products, technologies, or other outcomes that could intentionally or unintentionally cause significant societal harm; and (III) how technical or social solutions can mitigate such risks and, as appropriate, a plan to implement such mitigation measures. (iii) Guidance The Director shall issue clear guidance on what constitutes a foreseeable or quantifiable risk described in clause (ii)(II), and to the extent practical harmonize this policy with existing ethical policies or related requirements for human subjects. (iv) Annual reports The Director shall encourage grantees to update their ethics statements as appropriate as part of the annual reports required by all grantees under the grant terms and conditions. (d) Education (1) In general The Director of the National Science Foundation shall award grants for education programs at the K-12, community college, undergraduate, graduate, postdoctoral, adult learning, and retraining stages of education that— (A) support the development of a diverse workforce pipeline for science and technology with respect to artificial intelligence systems; (B) increase awareness of ethical, social, safety, and security implications of artificial intelligence systems; and (C) promote the widespread understanding of artificial intelligence principles and methods to create an educated workforce and general public able to use products enabled by artificial intelligence systems and adapt to future societal and economic changes caused by artificial intelligence systems. (2) Use of funds Grants awarded under this section for education activities referred to in paragraph (1) may be used for— (A) collaborative interdisciplinary research, development, testing, and dissemination of K-12, undergraduate, and community college curriculum development, dissemination, and other educational tools and methods in artificial intelligence related fields; (B) curriculum development in the field of technology ethics; (C) support for informal education activities for K-12 students to engage with artificial intelligence systems, including mentorship programs for underrepresented populations; (D) efforts to achieve equitable access to K-12 artificial intelligence education for populations and geographic areas traditionally underrepresented in the artificial intelligence field; (E) training and professional development programs, including innovative pre-service and in-service programs, in artificial intelligence and related fields for K-12 teachers; (F) efforts to improve the retention rate for researchers focusing on artificial intelligence systems at institutions of higher learning and other nonprofit research institutions; (G) outreach programs to educate the general public about the uses of artificial intelligence and its societal implications; (H) assessments of activities conducted under this subsection; and (I) any other relevant activities the Director determines will accomplish the aim described in paragraph (1). (3) Artificial intelligence traineeships and fellowships (A) Artificial intelligence traineeships (i) In general The Director of the National Science Foundation shall award grants to institutions of higher education to establish traineeship programs for graduate students who pursue artificial intelligence-related research leading to a masters or doctorate degree by providing funding and other assistance, and by providing graduate students opportunities for research experiences in government or industry related to the students’ artificial intelligence studies. (ii) Use of funds An institution of higher education shall use grant funds provided under clause (i) for the purposes of— (I) providing traineeships to students who are pursuing research in artificial intelligence leading to a masters or doctorate degree; (II) paying tuition and fees for students receiving traineeships who are citizens, nationals, or lawfully admitted permanent resident aliens of the United States; (III) creating and requiring courses or training programs in technology ethics for students receiving traineeships; (IV) creating opportunities for research in technology ethics for students receiving traineeships; (V) establishing scientific internship programs for students receiving traineeships in artificial intelligence at for-profit institutions, nonprofit research institutions, or government laboratories; and (VI) other costs associated with the administration of the program. (B) Artificial intelligence fellowships The Director of the National Science Foundation shall award fellowships to masters and doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers at institutions of higher education who are pursuing degrees or research in artificial intelligence and related fields, including in the field of technology ethics. In making such awards, the Director shall— (i) ensure recipients of artificial intelligence fellowships are citizens, nationals, or lawfully admitted permanent resident aliens of the United States; and (ii) conduct outreach, including through formal solicitations, to solicit proposals from students and postdoctoral researchers seeking to carry out research in aspects of technology ethics with relevance to artificial intelligence systems. (C) Faculty recruitment fellowships (i) In general The Director of the National Science Foundation shall establish a program to award grants to institutions of higher education to recruit and retain tenure-track or tenured faculty in artificial intelligence and related fields. (ii) Use of funds An institution of higher education shall use grant funds provided under clause (i) for the purposes of— (I) recruiting new tenure-track or tenured faculty members to that conduct research and teaching in artificial intelligence and related fields and research areas, including technology ethics; and (II) paying salary and benefits for the academic year of newly recruited tenure-track or tenured faculty members for a duration of up to three years. (D) Faculty technology ethics fellowships (i) In general The Director of the National Science Foundation shall establish a program to award fellowships to tenure-track and tenured faculty in social and behavioral sciences, ethics, law, and related fields to develop new research projects and partnerships in technology ethics, in collaboration with faculty conducting empirical research in artificial intelligence and related fields. (ii) Purposes The purposes of such fellowships are to enable researchers in social and behavioral sciences, ethics, law, and related fields to establish new research and education partnerships with researchers in artificial intelligence and related fields; learn new techniques and acquire systematic knowledge in artificial intelligence and related fields; shift their research to focus on technology ethics; and mentor and advise graduate students and postdocs pursuing research in technology ethics. (iii) Uses of funds A fellowship may include salary and benefits for up to one academic year and additional expenses to support coursework or equivalent training in artificial intelligence systems. (E) Update to Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program Section 10(i)(5) of the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2002 ( 42 U.S.C. 1862n–1(i)(5) and artificial intelligence computer science (4) Update to advanced technological education program (A) In general Section 3(b) of the Scientific and Advanced-Technology Act of 1992 ( 42 U.S.C. 1862(i) 10 12 (B) Artificial intelligence centers of excellence The Director of the National Science Foundation shall establish national centers of scientific and technical education to advance education and workforce development in areas related to artificial intelligence pursuant to Section 3 of the Scientific and Advanced-Technology Act of 1992 ( 42 U.S.C. 1862(i) (i) the development, dissemination, and evaluation of curriculum and other educational tools and methods in artificial intelligence related fields and research areas, including technology ethics; (ii) the development and evaluation of artificial intelligence related certifications for 2-year programs; and (iii) interdisciplinary science and engineering research in employment-based adult learning and career retraining related to artificial intelligence fields. V Department of Energy Artificial Intelligence Research Program 5501. Department of Energy Artificial Intelligence Research Program (a) In general The Secretary shall carry out a cross-cutting research and development program to advance artificial intelligence tools, systems, capabilities, and workforce needs and to improve the reliability of artificial intelligence methods and solutions relevant to the mission of the Department. In carrying out this program, the Secretary shall coordinate across all relevant offices and programs at the Department, including the Office of Science, the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, the Office of Nuclear Energy, the Office of Fossil Energy, the Office of Electricity, the Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response, the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, and any other relevant office determined by the Secretary. (b) Research areas In carrying out the program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall award financial assistance to eligible entities to carry out research projects on topics including— (1) the application of artificial intelligence systems to improve large-scale simulations of natural and other phenomena; (2) the study of applied mathematics, computer science, and statistics, including foundations of methods and systems of artificial intelligence, causal and statistical inference, and the development of algorithms for artificial intelligence systems; (3) the analysis of existing large-scale datasets from science and engineering experiments and simulations, including energy simulations and other priorities at the Department as determined by the Secretary using artificial intelligence tools and techniques; (4) the development of operation and control systems that enhance automated, intelligent decisionmaking capabilities; (5) the development of advanced computing hardware and computer architecture tailored to artificial intelligence systems, including the codesign of networks and computational hardware; (6) the development of standardized datasets for emerging artificial intelligence research fields and applications, including methods for addressing data scarcity; and (7) the development of trustworthy artificial intelligence systems, including— (A) algorithmic explainability; (B) analytical methods for identifying and mitigating bias in artificial intelligence systems; and (C) safety and robustness, including assurance, verification, validation, security, and control. (c) Technology transfer In carrying out the program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall support technology transfer of artificial intelligence systems for the benefit of society and United States economic competitiveness. (d) Facility use and upgrades In carrying out the program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall— (1) make available high-performance computing infrastructure at national laboratories; (2) make any upgrades necessary to enhance the use of existing computing facilities for artificial intelligence systems, including upgrades to hardware; (3) establish new computing capabilities necessary to manage data and conduct high performance computing that enables the use of artificial intelligence systems; and (4) maintain and improve, as needed, networking infrastructure, data input and output mechanisms, and data analysis, storage, and service capabilities. (e) Ethics (1) In general Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall amend grant proposal instructions to include a requirement for an ethics statement to be included as part of any proposal for funding prior to making the award. Such statement shall be considered by the Secretary in the review of proposals, taking into consideration any relevant input from the peer-reviewers for the proposal, and shall factor into award decisions as deemed necessary by the Secretary. Such statements may include, as appropriate— (A) the potential societal benefits of the research; (B) any foreseeable or quantifiable risks to society, including how the research could enable products, technologies, or other outcomes that could intentionally or unintentionally cause significant societal harm; and (C) how technical or social solutions can mitigate such risks and, as appropriate, a plan to implement such mitigation measures. (2) Guidance The Secretary shall issue clear guidance on what constitutes risks as described in section (1)(B), and to the extent practical harmonize this policy with existing ethical policies or related requirements for human subjects. (3) Annual reports The Secretary shall encourage awardees to update their ethics statements as appropriate as part of the annual reports required by all awardees under the grant terms and conditions. (f) Risk management The Secretary shall review agency policies for risk management in artificial intelligence related projects and issue as necessary policies and principles that are consistent with the framework developed under section 5301(b). (g) Data privacy and sharing The Secretary shall review agency policies for data sharing with other public and private sector organizations and issue as necessary policies and principles that are consistent with the standards and guidelines submitted under section 5301(c). In addition, the Secretary shall establish a streamlined mechanism for approving research projects or partnerships that require sharing sensitive public or private data with the Department. (h) Partnerships with other Federal agencies The Secretary may request, accept, and provide funds from other Federal departments and agencies, State, United States territory, local, or Tribal government agencies, private sector for-profit entities, and nonprofit entities, to be available to the extent provided by appropriations Acts, to support a research project or partnership carried out under this section. The Secretary may not give any special consideration to any agency or entity in return for a donation. (i) Stakeholder engagement In carrying out the activities authorized in this section, the Secretary shall— (1) collaborate with a range of stakeholders including small businesses, institutes of higher education, industry, and the National Laboratories; (2) leverage the collective body of knowledge from existing artificial intelligence and machine learning research; and (3) engage with other Federal agencies, research communities, and potential users of information produced under this section. (j) Definitions In this section: (1) Secretary The term Secretary (2) Department The term Department (3) National laboratory The term national laboratory 42 U.S.C. 15801 (4) Eligible entities The term eligible entities (A) an institution of higher education; (B) a National Laboratory; (C) a Federal research agency; (D) a State research agency; (E) a nonprofit research organization; (F) a private sector entity; or (G) a consortium of 2 or more entities described in subparagraph (A) through (F). Amend the title so as to read: A bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2021 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes. July 9, 2020 Reported with amendments; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed

Summary: William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 This bill authorizes FY2021 appropriations and sets forth policies for the Department of Defense (DOD) and other programs and activities. It does not provide budget authority, which is provided in subsequent appropriations legislation. The bill authorizes appropriations to DOD for Procurement, including aircraft, weapons and tracked combat vehicles, shipbuilding and conversion, and missiles; Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation; Operation and Maintenance; Working Capital Funds; Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction; Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities; the Defense Inspector General; the National Defense Sealift Fund; the Defense Health Program; the Armed Forces Retirement Home; the Space Force; Overseas Contingency Operations; and Military Construction. The bill also authorizes the FY2021 personnel strengths for active duty and reserve forces and sets forth policies regarding military personnel; acquisition policy and management; international programs; National Guard and Reserve Force facilities; compensation and other personnel benefits; health care; matters relating to COVID-19 (i.e., coronavirus disease 2019); DOD organization and management; civilian personnel matters; matters relating to foreign nations; and strategic programs, space activities, cyber operations, and intelligence matters. The bill authorizes appropriations for base realignment and closure activities, and maritime matters. The bill authorizes appropriations and sets forth policies for Department of Energy national security programs, including the National Nuclear Security Administration. The bill also sets forth policies regarding certain federal activities related to artificial intelligence, including implementation by the President of a National Artificial Intelligence Initiative to support research and development, education, and training programs. The bill establishes measures related to financial intelligence, anti-money laundering, and countering the financing of terrorism. These include expanding information sharing requirements among agencies that are tasked with administering efforts to counter money laundering and the financing of terrorism, as well as authorizing training and technical assistance to facilitate these measures. The bill reauthorizes and sets forth policies for the Coast Guard, including measures related to its personnel and organization. It also addresses other maritime matters such as navigation, shipping, and ports. Further, the bill sets forth policies for and addresses additional matters related to homeland security; veterans affairs; communications; intelligence; science, space, and technology; natural resources; oversight and reform; financial services; and semiconductor production. For more detailed information, see Congressional Research Service Report R46714, FY2021 National Defense Authorization Act: Context and Selected Issues for Congress; Congressional Research Service In Focus IF10515, Defense Primer: The NDAA Process; and Congressional Research Service In Focus IF10516, Defense Primer: Navigating the NDAA.