Demand Letter Transparency Act of 2015

To amend chapter 26 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Demand Letter Transparency Act of 2015 2. Demand letter disclosure requirement (a) Amendment Chapter 26 263. Disclosure of Information Related to Patent Ownership (a) Demand letter disclosure Any entity that sends 20 or more demand letters during any 365-day period shall, not later than the disclosure deadline, submit to the Patent and Trademark Office with respect to each patent that was the subject in each such letter the following: (1) Identification of the patent and confirmation that the entity that sent the letter is the owner of the patent (or a representative of such person) and is the last recorded entity in the records of the Patent and Trademark Office for purposes of assignment, grant, or conveyance under this chapter. (2) Identification of the entity that has the right to license the patent or, in the case of a patent already exclusively licensed, the name of the exclusive licensee. (3) Identification of each entity asserting a claim with regard to a patent in such letter in accordance with subsection (b). (4) Identification of each obligation to license the patent on reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms, including a copy of each letter of assurance to each standard-setting organization with respect to such obligation, and the financial terms, including the rate, at which such patent has been licensed pursuant to such obligation. (5) Identification of the ultimate parent entity of such entity. (6) Identification of the number of entities that received a demand letter from the entity that sent the letter. (7) Identification of any case that has been filed by such entity relating to each such patent, including the docket number and the court in which the case was filed. (8) Identification of any ex parte review under chapter 30 or inter partes review under chapter 31 of such patent. (9) Any required registration fee established with regard to this section. (b) Information not readily accessible An entity required to disclose the information described under subsection (a) shall include with such disclosure a description of any information described under subsection (a) that is not disclosed, why such undisclosed information was not readily accessible, and the efforts made by such entity to access such undisclosed information. (c) Identification (1) Publicly traded For purposes of subsection (a)(3), if the entity to be identified is owned or controlled by a corporation traded on a public stock exchange, an identification of the publicly traded corporation and the public stock exchange shall be sufficient. (2) Not publicly traded For purposes of subsection (a)(3), if the entity to be identified is not owned or controlled by a publicly traded corporation, the information shall identify— (A) in the case of a partnership, the name and address of each partner or other entity, holding more than a 5 percent share of that partnership; (B) in the case of a corporation, the location of incorporation and the name of each officer of the corporation; (C) in the case of an entity that is directly or indirectly controlled by another entity, the name and address of the entity and each other entity, and the name, address, location of incorporation, and each officer or partner of the entity and each other entity; and (D) for each individual, the name and address of that individual. (3) Number of demand letters The requirement under subsection (a)(6) shall be updated regularly by the Director. (d) Failure To comply (1) Monetary sanctions Any entity that does not meet the requirements of this section with regard to a patent or the disclosure requirements with respect to a demand letter under section 264 may be subject to monetary sanctions by a court in an action brought by such entity with regard to infringement or validity of such patent, for an amount to be awarded to the adverse party that covers any cost incurred by the adverse party resulting from the failure of such entity to meet the requirements of this section, including any reasonable cost incurred by such adverse party to discover the correct and complete information described under subsection (a) with regard to such patent, unless such sanctions would be unjust. (2) Award of damages or fees A court in a case involving monetary sanctions described in paragraph (1)— (A) may not award treble damages under the second undesignated paragraph of section 284 or attorney’s fees under section 285 to the entity described in paragraph (1), unless the denial of such damages or fees would be manifestly unjust; and (B) shall consider good faith mistakes in a relevant demand letter when calculating attorneys fees under section 285 and damages under section 284. (e) Ongoing duty To correct or supplement An entity described in subsection (a) shall update any filing made pursuant to such subsection with correct information not later than 20 days after any change in the information described under subsection (a). (f) Exemption This section shall not apply to any of the following: (1) The original inventor or joint inventor. (2) An institution of higher education (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 1001 (3) A technology transfer organization whose primary purpose is to facilitate the commercialization of technology developed by one or more institutions of higher education. (g) Definitions In this section: (1) Demand letter The term demand letter (2) Disclosure deadline The term disclosure deadline (3) Ultimate parent entity (A) In general Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the term ultimate parent entity (B) Modification of definition The Director may modify the definition of ultimate parent entity . (b) Technical and conforming amendment The table of sections for chapter 26 263. Disclosure of Information Related to Patent Ownership. . (c) Regulations The Director may promulgate such regulations as are necessary to establish a registration fee in an amount sufficient to recover the estimated costs of administering section 263 of title 35, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), to facilitate the collection and maintenance of the information required by such section, and to ensure the timely disclosure of such information to the public. (d) Demand letter database (1) Establishment Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director, in consultation with the Attorney General, shall establish a publicly accessible and searchable database of the information obtained pursuant to section 263 of title 35, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), to be maintained at and updated by the Office. (2) Protection of information The Director shall allow recipients of a demand letter (as such term is defined under section 263(g), as added by subsection (a)) to request the redaction of the company name, company-specific information, or any other company information from the database described in paragraph (1). 3. Demand letter requirement (a) Amendment Chapter 26 264. Requirements for patent infringement demand letters (a) In general Any entity sending a demand letter shall include in any demand letter sent to another entity the following: (1) An identification of each patent that is or may be allegedly infringing. (2) An identification of each claim of each patent identified under paragraph (1) that is allegedly infringed. (3) For each claim identified under paragraph (2), an identification of each accused apparatus, product, feature, device, method, system, process, function, act, service, or other instrumentality (referred to in this section as an accused instrumentality (4) For each accused instrumentality identified under paragraph (3), an identification with particularity, if known, of— (A) the name or model number of each accused instrumentality; and (B) the name of each accused method, system, process, function, act, or service, or the name or model number of each apparatus, product, feature, or device that, when used, allegedly results in the practice of the claimed invention. (5) For each accused instrumentality identified under paragraph (3), an explanation of— (A) where each element of each asserted claim identified under paragraph (2) is found within the accused instrumentality; (B) whether each such element is infringed literally or under the doctrine of equivalents; and (C) with detailed specificity, how the terms in each asserted claim identified under paragraph (2) correspond to the functionality of the accused instrumentality. (6) For each claim that is alleged to have been infringed indirectly, a description of— (A) the direct infringement; (B) any person alleged to be a direct infringer known to the party alleging infringement; and (C) the acts of the alleged indirect infringer that contribute to or are inducing the direct infringement. (7) A description of the right of the party alleging infringement to assert each— (A) patent identified under paragraph (1); and (B) patent claim identified in paragraph (2). (8) A description of the principal business of the party alleging infringement. (9) A list of each complaint filed, of which the party alleging infringement has knowledge, that asserts or asserted any of the patents identified under paragraph (1). (10) Identification of any case that has been filed by such entity relating to each patent identified under paragraph (1), including the docket number and the court in which the case was filed. (11) Identification of any ex parte review under chapter 30 or any inter partes review under chapter 31 for each patent identified under paragraph (1). (12) For each patent identified under paragraph (1), whether such patent is subject to any licensing term or pricing commitments through any agency, organization, standard-setting body, or other entity or community. (13) The identity of any person other than the party alleging infringement, known to the party alleging infringement, who— (A) owns or co-owns a patent identified under paragraph (1); (B) is the assignee of a patent identified under paragraph (1); or (C) is an exclusive licensee to a patent identified under paragraph (1). (14) The identity of any person other than the party alleging infringement, known to the party alleging infringement, who has a legal right to enforce a patent identified under paragraph (1) through a civil action under any Act of Congress relating to patents or is licensed under such patent. (15) The identity of any person with a direct financial interest in the outcome of the action, including a right to receive proceeds, or any fixed or variable portion thereof. (16) A description of any agreement or other legal basis for a financial interest described in paragraph (13). (17) A description of how the recipient of the demand letter can access the demand letter database of the Patent and Trademark Office. (18) At the bottom of such letter, a clear statement of the following: You are not required to respond to this letter by law. (b) Information not readily accessible An entity required to disclose the information described under subsection (a) shall include with such disclosure a description of any information described under subsection (a) that is not disclosed, why such undisclosed information was not readily accessible, and the efforts made by such entity to access such undisclosed information. (c) Demand letter defined In this section, the term demand letter . (b) Technical and conforming amendment The table of sections for chapter 26 264. Requirements for patent infringement demand letters. . 4. Penalties (a) Amendment Chapter 26 265. Penalties (a) Disclosure of information to the Patent and Trademark Office violation Any entity that receives a demand letter and that believes the requirements under section 263 have not been met with respect to such patent may submit to the Office in writing a petition— (1) describing the requirements that have not been met under section 263; and (2) anything else the Director determines to be necessary. (b) Demand letter requirement violation Any entity that receives a demand letter that does not meet the requirements described under section 264 may submit to the Office in writing a petition— (1) describing the requirements that have not been included in such letter; and (2) anything else the Director determines to be necessary. (c) Notice of intent To abandon If the Office determines that the requirements of section 263 or 264 have not been met with respect to a patent, the Office shall notify the patent owner that the patent will be voided unless a fee is paid not later than 3 months after the date on which the notification is sent. The Director may accept the payment of any fee required by this subsection if the delay is shown to the satisfaction of the Director to have been unintentional or unavoidable. The Director shall consider good faith mistakes in the determination of whether to void a patent under this section. (d) Demand letter defined In this section, the term demand letter . (b) Technical and conforming amendment The table of sections for chapter 26 265. Penalties. . (c) Regulations Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall establish, by regulation, a fee for filing a petition under section 265 in such amounts as the Director determines to be reasonable. 5. Definitions In this Act: (1) Director The term Director (2) Office The term Office 6. Effective date The amendments made by this Act shall take effect upon the expiration of the 6-month period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply to an entity that sends a demand letter (as such term is defined under section 263(g) of title 35, United States Code, as added by section 2(a)) on or after that date.

Summary: Demand Letter Transparency Act of 2015 Requires any entity that sends a specified number of demand letters during any 365-day period to submit to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), with respect to each patent that was the subject in each letter, a disclosure identifying: the patent, including a confirmation that the entity that sent the letter is the owner of the patent and is the last recorded entity in USPTO records for purposes of assignment, grant, or conveyance; the entity that has the right to license the patent or the name of the exclusive licensee; each entity asserting a claim with regard to the patent; each obligation to license the patent and the financial terms at which such patent has been licensed; the ultimate parent entity of such entity; the number of recipients of the letter; any case that has been filed by such entity relating to such patent; and any ex parte review or inter partes review of such patent. Defines "demand letter" as any written communication directed to an unaffiliated third party stating or indicating that the intended recipient, or anyone affiliated with that recipient, is or may be infringing a patent, or may bear liability or owe compensation to another because of such patent. Authorizes a court, in a patent infringement or validity action brought by an entity that does not meet such USPTO disclosure requirements, to sanction such entity for an amount to be awarded to the adverse party to cover any costs incurred as a result of such violation. Exempts from such disclosure requirements: (1) original or joint inventors, (2) institutions of higher education, and (3) technology transfer organizations facilitating the commercialization of technology developed by institutions of higher education. Directs the USPTO to establish a publicly accessible and searchable database of the information obtained pursuant to such disclosures. Requires any demand letter sent to another entity to include specified information concerning: each claim of each patent allegedly infringed, including each accused instrumentality; each party alleging infringement; the direct infringement for each claim alleged to have been infringed indirectly; the principal business of the party alleging infringement; each complaint filed that asserts or asserted any of the same patents, each case filed by such entity, and any ex parte or inter partes review for each patent; whether the patent is subject to any licensing term or pricing commitments; owners, co-owners, assignees, or exclusive licensees of the patent; any person who has a legal right to enforce the patent; any person with a direct financial interest in the outcome of the action; and how the recipient can access the USPTO demand letter database. Permits a recipient of a demand letter to file a petition with the USPTO if it believes that disclosure or patent letter information requirements have not been met. Directs the USPTO, if it determines that a requirement has not been met, to notify the patent owner that the patent will be voided unless a fee is paid. Requires the USPTO to consider good faith mistakes in the determination of whether to void a patent.