Manufacturing Skills Act of 2014

To establish a program that promotes reforms in workforce education and skill training for manufacturing in States and metropolitan areas, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Manufacturing Skills Act of 2014 2. Definitions In this Act: (1) Eligible entity The term eligible entity (2) Institution of higher education The term institution of higher education (A) An institution of higher education, as defined in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 1001(a) (B) A postsecondary vocational institution, as defined in section 102(c) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1002(c)). (3) Manufacturing sector The term manufacturing sector (4) Metropolitan area The term metropolitan area (5) Partnership The term Partnership (6) State The term State I Manufacturing Skills program 101. Manufacturing Skills program (a) Manufacturing Skills Partnership The Secretary of Commerce, Secretary of Labor, Secretary of Education, Secretary of the Department of Defense, and Director of the National Science Foundation shall jointly establish a Manufacturing Skills Partnership consisting of the Secretaries and the Director, or their representatives. The Partnership shall— (1) administer and carry out the program established under this title; (2) establish and publish guidelines for the review of applications, and the criteria for selection, for grants under this title; and (3) submit an annual report to Congress on— (A) the eligible entities that receive grants under this title; and (B) the progress such eligible entities have made in achieving the milestones identified in accordance with section 102(b)(2)(H). (b) Program authorized (1) In general From amounts appropriated to carry out this title, the Partnership shall award grants, on a competitive basis, to eligible entities to enable the eligible entities to carry out their proposals submitted in the application under section 102(b)(2), in order to promote reforms in workforce education and skill training for manufacturing in the eligible entities. (2) Grant duration A grant awarded under paragraph (1) shall be for a 3-year period, with grant funds under such grant distributed annually in accordance with subsection (c)(2). (3) Second grants If amounts are made available to award grants under this title for subsequent grant periods, the Partnership may award a grant to an eligible entity that previously received a grant under this title after such first grant period expires. The Partnership shall evaluate the performance of the eligible entity under the first grant in determining whether to award the eligible entity a second grant under this title. 102. Application and award process (a) In general An eligible entity that desires to receive a grant under this title shall— (1) establish a task force, consisting of leaders from the public, nonprofit, and manufacturing sectors, representatives of labor organizations, representatives of elementary schools and secondary schools, and representatives of institutions of higher education, to apply for and carry out a grant under this title; and (2) submit an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Partnership may require. (b) Application contents The application described in subsection (a)(2) shall include— (1) a description of the task force that the eligible entity has assembled to design the proposal described in paragraph (2); (2) a proposal that— (A) identifies, as of the date of the application— (i) the current strengths of the State or metropolitan area represented by the eligible entity in manufacturing; and (ii) areas for new growth opportunities in manufacturing; (B) identifies, as of the date of the application, manufacturing workforce and skills challenges preventing the eligible entity from expanding in the areas identified under subparagraph (A)(ii), such as— (i) a lack of availability of— (I) strong career and technical education; (II) educational programs in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics; or (III) a skills training system; or (ii) an absence of customized training for existing industrial businesses and sectors; (C) identifies challenges faced within the manufacturing sector by underrepresented and disadvantaged workers, including veterans, in the State or metropolitan area represented by the eligible entity; (D) provides strategies, designed by the eligible entity, to address challenges identified in subparagraphs (B) and (C) through tangible projects and investments, with the deep and sustainable involvement of manufacturing businesses; (E) identifies and leverages innovative and effective career and technical education or skills training programs in the field of manufacturing that are available in the eligible entity; (F) leverages other Federal funds in support of such strategies; (G) reforms State or local policies and governance, as applicable, in support of such strategies; and (H) holds the eligible entity accountable, on a regular basis, through a set of transparent performance measures, including a timeline for the grant period describing when specific milestones and reforms will be achieved; and (3) a description of the source of the matching funds required under subsection (d) that the eligible entity will use if selected for a grant under this title. (c) Award basis (1) Selection basis and maximum number of grants (A) In general The Partnership shall award grants under this title, by not earlier than January 1, 2015, and not later than March 31, 2015, to the eligible entities that submit the strongest and most comprehensive proposals under subsection (b)(2). (B) Maximum number of grants For any grant period, the Partnership shall award not more than 5 grants under this title to eligible entities representing States and not more than 5 grants to eligible entities representing metropolitan areas. (2) Amount of grants (A) In general The Partnership shall award grants under this title in an amount that averages, for all grants issued for a 3-year grant period, $10,000,000 for each year, subject to subparagraph (C) and paragraph (3). (B) Amount In determining the amount of each grant for an eligible entity, the Partnership shall take into consideration the size of the industrial base of the eligible entity. (C) Insufficient appropriations For any grant period for which the amounts available to carry out this title are insufficient to award grants in the amount described in subparagraph (A), the Partnership shall award grants in amounts determined appropriate by the Partnership. (3) Funding contingent on performance In order for an eligible entity to receive funds under a grant under this title for the second or third year of the grant period, the eligible entity shall demonstrate to the Partnership that the eligible entity has achieved the specific reforms and milestones required under the timeline included in the eligible entity's proposal under subsection (b)(2)(H). (4) Consultation with policy experts The Partnership shall assemble a panel of manufacturing policy experts and manufacturing leaders from the private sector to serve in an advisory capacity in helping to oversee the competition and review the competition's effectiveness. (d) Matching funds An eligible entity receiving a grant under this title shall provide matching funds toward the grant in an amount of not less than 50 percent of the costs of the activities carried out under the grant. Matching funds under this subsection shall be from non-Federal sources and shall be in cash or in-kind. 103. Authorization of appropriations (a) In general There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this title such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2015. (b) Availability Funds appropriated under this section shall remain available until expended. II Audit of Federal education and skills training 201. Audit of Federal education and skills training (a) Audit By not later than March 31, 2015, the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, acting through the Advanced Manufacturing National Program Office, shall conduct an audit of all Federal education and skills training programs related to manufacturing to ensure that States and metropolitan areas are able to align Federal resources to the greatest extent possible with the labor demands of their primary manufacturing industries. In carrying out the audit, the Director shall work with States and metropolitan areas to determine how Federal funds can be more tailored to meet their different needs. (b) Report and recommendations By not later than March 31, 2016, the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall prepare and submit a report to Congress that includes— (1) a summary of the findings from the audit conducted under subsection (a); and (2) recommendations for such legislative and administrative actions to reform the existing funding for Federal education and skills training programs related to manufacturing as the Director determines appropriate. III Offset 301. Rescission of Department of Labor funds (a) Rescission of funds Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an amount equal to the amount of funds made available to carry out title I for a fiscal year shall be rescinded, in accordance with subsection (b), from the unobligated discretionary funds available to the Secretary from prior fiscal years. (b) Return of funds Notwithstanding any other provision of law, by not later than 15 days after funds are appropriated or made available to carry out title I, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall— (1) identify from which appropriations accounts available to the Secretary of Labor the rescission described in subsection (a) shall apply; and (2) determine the amount of the rescission that shall apply to each account.

Summary: Manufacturing Skills Act of 2014 - Directs the Secretaries of Commerce, Labor, Education, and Defense (DOD) and the Director of the National Science Foundation (NSF) to jointly establish a Manufacturing Skills Partnership to administer and carry out a program to award compeititve, three-year grants to enable up to five states and five metropolitan areas to carry out proposals to promote reforms in workforce education and skill training for manufacturing. Requires the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST): (1) acting through the Advanced Manufacturing National Program Office, to conduct an audit of all federal education and skills training programs related to manufacturing to ensure that states and metropolitan areas are able to align federal resources with the labor demands of their primary manufacturing industries; and (2) to work with states and metropolitan areas to determine how federal funds can be more tailored to meet their different needs.