Accelerating Biomedical Research Act

To prioritize funding for the National Institutes of Health to discover treatments and cures, to maintain global leadership in medical innovation, and to restore the purchasing power the NIH had after the historic doubling campaign that ended in fiscal year 2003. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Accelerating Biomedical Research Act 2. Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) The National Institutes of Health (referred to in this section as the NIH (2) Over the past 40 years, NIH-supported research contributed to the discovery of 153 new Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs, vaccines, or new indications for current drugs. (3) The application success rate is now at an all-time low. From 1980 to 2003, the last year of the doubling, the grant application success rate ranged between 25 and 35 percent. By 2013, the grant success rate had fallen to 16.8 percent. (4) Recent Federal funding cuts threaten to diminish United States leadership in the world. The international community has recognized the role biomedical research plays in generating economic growth. England, China, Brazil, South Korea, India, Singapore, Germany, France and Japan are increasing their investment, despite the worldwide recession. Only the United States has decreased its investment, from 0.215 percent of Gross Domestic Product in 2003 (the last year of the doubling) to 0.174 percent in 2013. In 8 years, if current trends continue, China will surpass the United States in total government biomedical research investment. (5) NIH is vital to the United States economy. In fiscal year 2012, the NIH extramural program supported around 50,000 competitive research grants and 300,000 scientists and research personnel at more than 2,500 universities, medical schools, and other research institutions across our 50 States. (6) Economists have estimated the return on each dollar of investment in NIH to generate anywhere from $1.80 to $3.20 in economic output. The Federal investment of $3,800,000,000 in the Human Genome Project from 1988 to 2003 helped drive $796,000,000,000 in economic output, which is a return of $141 for every $1 invested. (7) In 2013, sales of products built around licensed NIH and Food and Drug Administration inventions included 358 licensees reporting a total of $7,000,000,000 in sales. (8) The historic doubling of Federal funding for the National Institutes of Health ended in fiscal year 2003. Since that time, NIH appropriations have not kept up with biomedical inflation. NIH has lost more than 20 percent of its purchasing power for medical research since 2003. (9) If NIH had kept up with biomedical inflation, NIH’s appropriation would have totaled $37,000,000,000 in 2013, instead of the $28,900,000,000 that was actually appropriated, a loss of $8,100,000,000 or 28 percent. To restore funding to the 2003 post-doubling level would require Congress to appropriate $46,500,000,000 in fiscal year 2021, the final year of the Budget Control Act of 2011 ( Public Law 112–25 (10) High health care costs from a variety of common conditions threaten Federal, State, and local budgets, as well as the budgets of American families. Recent estimates indicate that the economic costs of Alzheimer’s disease is over $200,000,000,000 each year but will rise to over $1,000,000,000,000 by 2050 unless a prevention or cure is found. In 2006, economists found that a future 1 percent reduction in mortality rates from cancer would save $500,000,000,000 to current and future Americans. A cure for cancer was estimated to save $50,000,000,000,000 to Americans, more than 3 times the gross domestic product of the United States in 2012. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that annual costs from undiagnosed diabetes was $245,000,000,000 each year. And a recent study projects that by 2030, nearly 44 percent of the United States population will face some form of cardiovascular disease costing a total of $1,208,000,000,000 between 2012 and 2030. (11) Budget cap adjustments are how Congress traditionally prioritizes areas of spending that produce economic growth and reduce costs that contribute to the Federal debt. 3. Cap adjustment Section 251(b)(2) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 ( 2 U.S.C. 901(b)(2) (1) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (E); and (2) by inserting after subparagraph (C), the following: (D) National Institutes of Health (i) In general If a bill or joint resolution making appropriations for a fiscal year is enacted that specifies amounts for the National Institutes of Health at the Department of Health and Human Services (75–9915–1–1–552), then the adjustments for that fiscal year shall be the amount of additional new budget authority provided in that Act for such programs for that fiscal year, but shall not exceed— (I) for fiscal year 2016, $3,000,000,000 in additional new budget authority; (II) for fiscal year 2017, $6,300,000,000 in additional new budget authority; (III) for fiscal year 2018, $8,450,000,000 in additional new budget authority; (IV) for fiscal year 2019, $10,740,000,000 in additional new budget authority; (V) for fiscal year 2020, $13,160,000,000 in additional new budget authority; and (VI) for fiscal year 2021, $15,730,000,000 in additional new budget authority. (ii) Definitions As used in this subparagraph: (I) Additional new budget authority The term additional new budget authority (II) National Institutes of Health The term National Institutes of Health .

Summary: Accelerating Biomedical Research Act This bill amends the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to require certain adjustments to discretionary spending limits in FY2016-FY2021 to accommodate increases in appropriations to the National Institutes of Health at the Department of Health and Human Services.