Climate Change Financial Risk Act of 2019

To require the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, in consultation with the heads of other relevant Federal agencies, to develop financial risk analyses relating to climate change, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Climate Change Financial Risk Act of 2019 2. Sense of congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) if current trends continue, average global temperatures are likely to reach 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels between 2030 and 2050; (2) global temperature rise has already resulted in an increased number of heavy rainstorms, coastal flooding events, heat waves, wildfires, and other extreme events; (3) since 1980— (A) the number of extreme weather events per year that cost the people of the United States more than $1,000,000,000 per event, accounting for inflation, has increased significantly; and (B) the total cost of extreme weather events in the United States has exceeded $1,100,000,000,000; (4) as physical impacts from climate change are manifested across multiple sectors of the economy of the United States— (A) climate-related economic risks will continue to increase; (B) climate-related extreme weather events will disrupt energy and transportation systems in the United States, which will result in more frequent and longer-lasting power outages, fuel shortages, and service disruptions in critical sectors across the economy of the United States; (C) projected increases in extreme heat conditions will lead to decreases in labor productivity in agriculture, construction, and other critical economic sectors; (D) food and livestock production will be impacted in regions that experience increases in heat and drought and small rural communities will struggle to find the resources needed to adapt to those changes; and (E) sea level rise and more frequent and intense extreme weather events will— (i) increasingly disrupt and damage private property and critical infrastructure; and (ii) drastically increase insured and uninsured losses; (5) advances in energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies, as well as climate policies and shifting societal preferences, will— (A) reduce global demand for fossil fuels; and (B) expose transition risks for fossil fuel companies and investors, which could include trillions of dollars of stranded assets around the world; (6) climate change poses uniquely far-reaching risks to the financial services industry, including with respect to underwriting, credit, and market risks, due to the number of sectors and locations impacted and the potentially irreversible scale of damage; (7) financial institutions must take a consistent approach to assessing climate-related financial risks and incorporating those risks into existing risk management practices, which should be informed by scenario analysis; (8) the Board of Governors conducts annual assessments of the capital adequacy and capital planning practices of the largest and most complex banking organizations (referred to in this section as stress tests (9) as of the date of enactment of this Act, the stress tests conducted by the Board of Governors are not designed to reflect the physical risks or transition risks posed by climate change; and (10) the Board of Governors— (A) has the authority to take into account the potentially systemic impact of climate-related risks on the financial system; and (B) should develop new analytical tools with longer time horizons to accurately assess and manage the risks described in subparagraph (A). 3. Definitions In this Act: (1) Bank holding company The term bank holding company 12 U.S.C. 5311(a) (2) Board of governors The term Board of Governors (3) Climate science leads The term climate science leads (A) the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; (B) the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency; (C) the Secretary of Energy; (D) the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; (E) the Director of the United States Geological Survey; (F) the Secretary of the Interior; and (G) the head of any other Federal agency that the Board of Governors determines to be appropriate. (4) Covered entity The term covered entity (A) a nonbank financial company or bank holding company that has not less than $250,000,000,000 in total consolidated assets; and (B) a nonbank financial company or bank holding company— (i) that has not less than $100,000,000,000 in total consolidated assets; and (ii) with respect to which the Board of Governors determines the application of subparagraph (C) of section 165(i)(1) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010 ( 12 U.S.C. 5365(i)(1) (I) to— (aa) prevent or mitigate risks to the financial stability of the United States; or (bb) promote the safety and soundness of the company; and (II) after taking into consideration— (aa) the capital structure, riskiness, complexity, financial activities, and size of the company, including the financial activities of any subsidiary of the company; and (bb) any other risk-related factor that the Board of Governors determines to be appropriate. (5) Nonbank financial company The term nonbank financial company 12 U.S.C. 5311(a)(4)(C) (6) Physical risks The term physical risks (A) increased average global temperatures; (B) increased severity and frequency of extreme weather events; (C) increased flooding; (D) sea level rise; (E) ocean acidification; (F) increased severity and frequency of heat waves; (G) increased frequency of wildfires; (H) decreased arability of farmland; and (I) decreased availability of fresh water. (7) Technical development group The term Technical Development Group (8) Transition risks The term transition risks (A) costs relating to— (i) international treaties and agreements; (ii) Federal, State, and local policies; (iii) new technologies; (iv) changing markets; (v) reputational impacts relevant to changing consumer behavior; and (vi) litigation; and (B) a loss in the value, or the stranding, of assets due to any of the costs described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subparagraph (A). (9) Value chain The term value chain (A) means the total lifecycle of a product or service, both before and after production of the product or service, as applicable; and (B) may include the sourcing of materials, production, and disposal with respect to the product or service described in subparagraph (A). 4. Climate risk scenario technical development group (a) Establishment The Board of Governors shall establish a technical advisory group to be known as the Climate Risk Scenario Technical Development Group. (b) Membership (1) Composition The Technical Development Group shall be composed of 10 members— (A) 5 of whom shall be climate scientists; and (B) 5 of whom shall be economists, with expertise in either the United States financial system or the risks posed by climate change. (2) Selection The Board of Governors shall select the members of the Technical Development Group after consultation with the climate science leads. (c) Duties The Technical Development Group shall— (1) provide recommendations to the Board of Governors regarding the development of, and updates to, the climate change risk scenarios under section 5; (2) after the establishment of the climate change risk scenarios under section 5, determine the financial and economic risks resulting from those scenarios; (3) make any final work product and any data sets or other inputs used in the development of the final work product, publicly available; and (4) provide technical assistance to covered entities on assessing physical risks or transition risks. (d) Inapplicability of federal advisory committee act The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply with respect to the Technical Development Group. 5. Development and updating of climate change risk scenarios (a) In general (1) Initial development Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Board of Governors, in coordination with the climate science leads, and taking into consideration the recommendations of the Technical Development Group, shall develop 3 separate climate change risk scenarios as follows: (A) One scenario that assumes an average increase in global temperatures of 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. (B) One scenario that assumes an average increase in global temperatures of 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. (C) One scenario that— (i) assumes the likely and very likely average increase in global temperatures that can be expected, taking into consideration the extent to which national policies and actions relating to climate change have been implemented, as of the date on which the scenario is developed, or on which the scenario is updated under paragraph (2), as applicable; and (ii) does not take into consideration commitments for policies and actions relating to climate change that, as of the applicable date described in clause (i), have not been implemented. (2) Updates After the initial development of the climate change risk scenarios under paragraph (1), the Board of Governors, in coordination with the climate science leads, and taking into consideration the recommendations of the Technical Development Group, shall update those scenarios once every 3 years. (3) International coordination In developing and updating the 3 scenarios required under this subsection, the Board of Governors shall take into consideration analytic tools and best practices developed by international banking supervisors relating to climate risks and scenario analysis in an effort to develop consistent and comparable data-driven scenarios. (4) Recommendations If the Technical Development Group determines that the average increase in global temperatures described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) is no longer scientifically valid, the Technical Development Group may recommend that the Board of Governors, in coordination with the climate science leads, update the average increase in global temperatures described in the applicable subparagraph to reflect the most current assessment of climate change science. (b) Considerations In developing and updating each of the 3 scenarios required under subsection (a), the Board of Governors, in coordination with the climate science leads, shall account for physical risks and transition risks that may disrupt business operations across the global economy, including through— (1) disruptions with respect to— (A) the sourcing of materials; (B) production; and (C) the disposal of products and services; (2) changes in the availability and prices of raw materials and other inputs; (3) changes in agricultural production and with respect to food security; (4) direct damages to fixed assets; (5) increases in costs associated with insured or uninsured losses; (6) changes in asset values; (7) impacts on— (A) aggregate demand for products and services; (B) labor productivity; (C) asset liquidity; and (D) credit availability; (8) mass migration and increases in disease and mortality rates; (9) international conflict, as such conflict relates to global economic activity and output; and (10) changes in any other microeconomic or macroeconomic condition that the Board of Governors, in coordination with the climate science leads, determines to be relevant. 6. Climate-related enhanced supervision for certain nonbank financial companies and bank holding companies Section 165(i)(1) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010 ( 12 U.S.C. 5365(i)(1) (1) in subparagraph (B)(i), by inserting except as provided in subparagraph (C)(ii)(I), shall provide (2) by adding at the end the following: (C) Biennial tests required (i) Definitions In this subparagraph— (I) the term capital distribution (II) the term capital policy (III) the terms climate science leads covered entity (ii) Tests (I) In general Subject to the other requirements of this clause, the Board of Governors, in coordination with the appropriate primary financial regulatory agencies and the climate science leads, shall conduct biennial analyses in which each covered entity is subject to evaluation, under an adverse set of conditions, of whether that covered entity has the capital, on a total consolidated basis, necessary to absorb financial losses that would arise under each climate change risk scenario developed under section 5 of the Climate Change Financial Risk Act of 2019. (II) Initial tests With respect to each of the first 3 analyses conducted under subclause (I)— (aa) the covered entity to which such an analysis applies shall not be subject to any adverse consequences as a result of the analysis; and (bb) the Board of Governors shall— (AA) not later than 60 days after the date on which the Board of Governors completes each such analysis, make a summary of the analysis publicly available; and (BB) submit a copy of the results of the analysis to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives. (III) Climate risk capital policy (aa) In general Except with respect to the first analysis conducted under subclause (I), each covered entity shall, before being subject to an analysis under that subclause, submit to the Board of Governors a capital policy with respect to climate risk planning (referred to in this subclause as a climate risk capital policy (bb) Rejection Except as provided in subclause (II)(aa), the Board of Governors may object to a climate risk capital policy submitted by a covered entity under item (aa) if the Board of Governors determines that— (AA) the covered entity has not demonstrated a reasonable plan to maintain capital above each minimum regulatory capital ratio on a pro forma basis under the adverse set of conditions described in subclause (I); (BB) the climate risk capital policy is otherwise not reasonable or appropriate; (CC) the assumptions and analysis underlying the climate risk capital policy, or the methodologies and practices that support the climate risk capital policy, are not reasonable or appropriate; or (DD) the climate risk capital policy otherwise constitutes an unsafe or unsound practice. (cc) General distribution limitation If the Board of Governors, under item (bb), objects to a climate risk capital policy submitted by a covered entity under item (aa), the covered entity may not make any capital distribution, other than a capital distribution arising from the issuance of a regulatory capital instrument eligible for inclusion in the numerator of a minimum regulatory capital ratio. . 7. Financial stability oversight council (a) In general The Financial Stability Oversight Council shall establish a subcommittee of the Council that shall support the Council in identifying risks to, and in responding to emerging threats to, the stability of the United States financial system as a result of climate change. (b) Responsibilities (1) Subcommittee The subcommittee established under subsection (a) shall, not later than 1 year after the completion of the first analysis required under subparagraph (C) of section 165(i)(1) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010 ( 12 U.S.C. 5365(i)(1) (2) Council For each year after the year in which the assessment required under paragraph (1) is submitted, the Financial Stability Oversight Council shall include in the annual report required under section 112(a)(2)(N) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010 ( 12 U.S.C. 5322(a)(2)(N) (c) Composition The subcommittee established under subsection (a) shall be composed of— (1) the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; (2) the Secretary of the Treasury; (3) the Comptroller of the Currency; (4) the Chairperson of the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; (5) the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission; (6) the Chairperson of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission; and (7) any other voting or nonvoting members that the Financial Stability Oversight Council determines to be appropriate.

Summary: Climate Change Financial Risk Act of 2019 This bill addresses climate change risk and its potential impact on the financial system. The Federal Reserve Board must develop financial risk analyses relating to climate change for specified large nonbank financial companies and bank holding companies. Specifically, these entities will be evaluated every two years on whether they have the capital necessary to absorb financial losses that would arise under several different climate change risk scenarios. The bill also establishes the Climate Risk Scenario Technical Development Group to provide recommendations to the board regarding such climate change risk scenarios, and determine the financial and economic risks of these scenarios. The Financial Stability Oversight Council of the Department of the Treasury must establish a subcommittee to assist it in identifying risks and responding to threats to the financial system as a result of climate change.