Fairness for Crime Victims Act of 2020

To curtail the use of changes in mandatory programs affecting the Crime Victims Fund to inflate spending. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Fairness for Crime Victims Act of 2020 2. Point of order against certain changes in mandatory programs affecting the Crime Victims Fund (a) Findings Congress finds that— (1) the Crime Victims Fund was created in 1984, with the support of overwhelming bipartisan majorities in the House of Representatives and the Senate and the support of President Ronald Reagan, who signed the Victims of Crime Act of 1984 ( Public Law 98–473 (2) the Crime Victims Fund was created based on the principle that funds the Federal Government collects from those convicted of crime should be used to aid those who have been victimized by crime; (3) the Crime Victims Fund is funded from fines, penalties, and forfeited bonds in Federal court and private donations; (4) the Crime Victims Fund receives no taxpayer dollars; (5) Federal law provides that funds deposited into the Crime Victims Fund shall be used to provide services to victims of crime in accordance with the Victims of Crime Act of 1984; (6) the Victims of Crime Act of 1984 gives priority to victims of child abuse, sexual assault, and domestic violence; (7) since fiscal year 2000, Congress has been accounting for funds collected by the Crime Victims Fund, but not disbursing the full amount provided for under the Victims of Crime Act of 1984; (8) over $10,000,000,000 has been withheld from victims of child abuse, sexual assault, domestic violence, and other crimes; (9) from fiscal year 2010 through fiscal year 2014, the Crime Victims Fund collected $12,000,000,000, but Congress disbursed only $3,600,000,000 (or 30 percent) to victims of crime; (10) since fiscal year 2015, Congress has increased disbursals from the Crime Victims Fund to victims of crime, but a permanent solution is necessary to ensure consistent disbursals to victims of crime who rely on these funds every year; (11) under budget rules, Congress represents that the money it has already spent in prior years is still in the Crime Victims Fund and available for victims of crime; (12) it is time to restore fairness to crime victims; and (13) funds collected by the Crime Victims Fund should be used for services to and compensation of crime victims in accordance with the Victims of Crime Act of 1984. (b) Amendment Title IV of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 ( 2 U.S.C. 651 C Additional limitations on budgetary and appropriations legislation 441. Point of order against changes in mandatory programs affecting the Crime Victims Fund (a) Definitions In this section— (1) the term CHIMP (A) would have been estimated as affecting direct spending or receipts under section 252 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 ( 2 U.S.C. 902 (B) results in a net decrease in budget authority in the current year or the budget year, but does not result in a net decrease in outlays over the period of the total of the current year, the budget year, and all fiscal years covered under the most recently adopted concurrent resolution on the budget; (2) the term Crime Victims Fund 34 U.S.C. 20101 (3) the term 3-year average amount (b) Point of order in the Senate (1) Point of order (A) In general In the Senate, it shall not be in order to consider a provision in a bill or joint resolution making appropriations for all or a portion of a fiscal year, or an amendment thereto, amendment between the Houses in relation thereto, conference report thereon, or motion thereon, that contains a CHIMP that, if enacted, would cause the amount available for obligation during the fiscal year from the Crime Victims Fund to be less than the 3-year average amount. (B) Point of order sustained If a point of order is made by a Senator against a provision described in subparagraph (A), and the point of order is sustained by the Chair, that provision shall be stricken from the measure and may not be offered as an amendment from the floor. (2) Form of the point of order A point of order under paragraph (1) may be raised by a Senator as provided in section 313(e). (3) Conference reports When the Senate is considering a conference report on, or an amendment between the Houses in relation to, a bill or joint resolution, upon a point of order being made by any Senator pursuant to paragraph (1), and such point of order being sustained, such material contained in such conference report or House amendment shall be stricken, and the Senate shall proceed to consider the question of whether the Senate shall recede from its amendment and concur with a further amendment, or concur in the House amendment with a further amendment, as the case may be, which further amendment shall consist of only that portion of the conference report or House amendment, as the case may be, not so stricken. Any such motion in the Senate shall be debatable. In any case in which such point of order is sustained against a conference report (or Senate amendment derived from such conference report by operation of this subsection), no further amendment shall be in order. (4) Supermajority waiver and appeal In the Senate, this subsection may be waived or suspended only by an affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members, duly chose and sworn. An affirmative vote of three-fifths of Members of the Senate, duly chosen and sworn shall be required to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order raised under this subsection. (5) Determination For purposes of this subsection, budgetary levels shall be determined on the basis of estimates provided by the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the Senate. (c) Point of order in the House of Representatives (1) In general A provision in a bill or joint resolution making appropriations for a fiscal year that proposes a CHIMP that, if enacted, would cause the amount available for obligation during the fiscal year from the Crime Victims Fund to be less than the 3-year average amount shall not be in order in the House of Representatives. (2) Amendments and conference reports It shall not be in order in the House of Representatives to consider an amendment to, or a conference report on, a bill or joint resolution making appropriations for a fiscal year if such amendment thereto or conference report thereon proposes a CHIMP that, if enacted, would cause the amount available for obligation during the fiscal year from the Crime Victims Fund to be less than the 3-year average amount. (3) Determination For purposes of this subsection, budgetary levels shall be determined on the basis of estimates provided by the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the House of Representatives. . (c) Technical and conforming amendment The table of contents in section 1(b) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 428 the following: PART C—Additional limitations on budgetary and appropriations legislation Sec. 441. Point of order against changes in mandatory programs affecting the Crime Victims Fund. .

Summary: Fairness for Crime Victims Act of 2020 This bill establishes budget points of order in the House of Representatives and the Senate against considering provisions in appropriations legislation that contain changes in mandatory programs (CHIMPs) that would cause the amount available for obligation during the fiscal year from the Crime Victims Fund to be less than the annual average for the three previous fiscal years. A CHIMP is a provision that (1) would have been estimated as affecting direct spending or receipts if the provision were included in legislation other than an appropriations bill; and (2) results in a net decrease in budget authority in the current year or the budget year, but does not result in a net decrease in outlays over the period of the total of the current year, the budget year, and all fiscal years covered under the most recently adopted budget resolution.