VOTE Act of 2016

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to make improvements to voting system technology, election official training, and protecting voting system source code. 1. Short Title This Act may be cited as the Verifying Optimal Tools for Elections Act of 2016 VOTE Act of 2016 2. Payments to States to replace outdated voting machines (a) In general Subtitle D of title II of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 ( 52 U.S.C. 21001 et seq. 7 Outdated voting machines 297. Replacement of outdated voting machines (a) In general Not later than 45 days after the date of the enactment of the Verifying Optimal Tools for Elections Act of 2016 Commission qualifying precinct (b) Eligibility A State is eligible to receive a payment under the program under this section if the State, not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of the Verifying Optimal Tools for Elections Act of 2016 (c) Use of funds A State shall use the funds provided under a payment under this section (either directly or as reimbursement, including as reimbursement for costs incurred on or after July 30, 2016, under multiyear contracts) to replace outdated voting machines in qualifying precincts within that State with voting machines (by purchase, lease, or such other arrangement as may be appropriate) that— (1) (A) have never been used in any general election for Federal office and are not outdated voting machines; or (B) have been used only with respect to general elections for Federal office held after November 2012; and (2) are auditable (as defined in the report submitted by the Auditable Working Group of the National Institute of Standards and Technology submitted to the Commission on January 4, 2011) and meet the requirements for such auditability specified in such report. (d) Condition As a condition on receiving a payment under this section, a State shall provide funds, in-kind contributions, or a combination of both, from sources other than funds provided through such payment in an amount that is at least equal to one-third of the amount of such payment. (e) Amount of payment The Commission shall determine the amount of payment made to a State under the program under this section based on— (1) the number of outdated voting machines used by a qualifying precinct; and (2) the number of the qualifying precincts within the State. (f) Enforcement A State receiving a payment under the program under this section shall ensure that all of the outdated voting machines in the qualifying precincts within that State have been replaced in time for the regularly scheduled general election for Federal office to be held in November 2018. (g) Authorization of appropriations There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $125,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2017 and 2018. (h) Outdated voting machine defined The term outdated voting machine . (b) Conforming table of contents amendment The table of contents of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 ( 52 U.S.C. 20901 Part 7. Grants for education and training of election officials Sec. 297. Replacement of outdated voting machines. . 3. Election official training (a) In general Subtitle D of title II of the Help America Vote Act ( 52 U.S.C. 21001 et seq. 8 Grants for education and training of election officials 298. Grants for education and training of election officials (a) In general The Commission shall make grants to States to provide for the education and training, through the use of webinars or other appropriate means, of election officials and poll workers on voting machine maintenance, pre- and post-election voting machine testing, the development of contingency plans, and such other topics as may be necessary for purposes of streamlining the voting process. (b) Grant (1) Certification A State seeking a grant under this section shall submit to the Commission a certification in such form and manner as the Commission may specify with respect to the State’s expenditures in providing for the education and training described in subsection (a). (2) Amount The amount of a grant made to a State shall be determined by the Commission based on the Commission’s determination of the State’s reasonable costs incurred in providing the education and training described in subsection (a). (3) Transmission of grant/payment Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Commission receives the certification specified in paragraph (1), the Commission shall make a payment to the State in an amount equal to the amount of the grant determined for such State under paragraph (2). (c) Authorization of appropriations There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $50,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2017 through 2018. (d) State defined In this section, the term State . (b) Conforming table of contents amendment The table of contents of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 ( 52 U.S.C. 20901 Part 8. Grants for education and training of election officials Sec. 298. Grants for education and training of election officials. . 4. Grants for research on voting technology improvements (a) In general Part 4 of subtitle D of title II of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 ( 52 U.S.C. 21051 et seq. 284. Grants for testing open source software (a) In general The Commission shall make grants to States or any political subdivision thereof to conduct pilot testing with respect to, and carry out the implementation of, voting systems that use— (1) non-proprietary open source software; and (2) commercial or custom firmware and hardware. (b) Condition As a condition on receiving a grant under this section, a State (or a political subdivision thereof) shall submit to the Commission an exact copy of the source code for— (1) each component of the voting system that is the subject of the grant, including complete build and configuration instructions and related documents for compiling the source code into object code; and (2) any interactive enhancements made to such system within 30 days of such enhancements being made. (c) Authorization of appropriations There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2017 through 2018. (d) Open source software defined The term open source software 285. Grants for a common data format allowing for voting-equipment device interoperability (a) In general The National Institute of Standards and Technology shall develop, or make grants to one or more eligible entities to develop, a common data format allowing for voting-equipment device interoperability. (b) Authorization of appropriations There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2017 through 2018. . (b) Conforming table of contents amendment The table of contents of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 ( 52 U.S.C. 20901 284. Grants for testing open source software. 285. Grants for a common data format allowing for voting-equipment device interoperability. . 5. Deposit of Election-Dedicated Voting System Technology in National Software Reference Library (a) Deposit Required; Conditions for Disclosure Section 301(a) of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 ( 42 U.S.C. 15481(a) (7) Prohibiting use of election-dedicated voting system technologies not deposited with National Software Reference Library; disclosure requirements (A) Prohibition (i) In general A voting system used in an election for Federal office in a State may not at any time during the election contain or use any election-dedicated voting system technology which is not deposited by the State (or, at the option of the State, by the vendor of the technology) with the National Software Reference Library of the National Institute of Standards and Technology prior to the date of the election, to be held in escrow and subject to disclosure in accordance with subparagraph (B). (ii) Extension of deadline for deposit If the chief State election official certifies to the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology prior to the date of the election that, because of a revision to the election-dedicated voting system technology which is made less than 30 days prior to the date of the election, the State or vendor is unable to deposit the technology in accordance with clause (i) prior to the date of the election, the voting system used in the election may contain or use the technology if— (I) the chief State election official approves the use of the technology for the election; and (II) the State or vendor deposits the technology in accordance with clause (i) not later than 1 week after the date of the election. (iii) Enforcement of vendor responsibilities If a State opts to require the vendor of election-dedicated voting system technology to deposit the technology in accordance with this subparagraph and the vendor fails to do so, the Attorney General may bring a civil action against the vendor in an appropriate district court for such relief as may be appropriate, including injunctive relief or an order for a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed $500,000. (B) Requirement for disclosure and limitation on restricting disclosure With respect to any election-dedicated voting system technology which is deposited under subparagraph (A), the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall— (i) hold the technology in escrow; and (ii) disclose technology and information regarding the technology to another person if— (I) the person is a qualified person described in subparagraph (C) who has entered into a nondisclosure agreement with respect to the technology which meets the requirements of subparagraph (D); or (II) the Director is permitted or required to disclose the technology to the person under the law of the applicable State, in accordance with the terms and conditions applicable under such law. (C) Qualified persons described With respect to the disclosure of election-dedicated voting system technology under subparagraph (B)(ii)(I), a qualified person (i) A governmental entity with responsibility for the administration of voting and election-related matters in elections for Federal office, for purposes of reviewing, analyzing, or reporting on the technology. (ii) If permitted under a court order, a party to post-election litigation challenging the result of an election or the administration or use of the technology used in an election, but only to the extent permitted under the terms and conditions of such court order. (iii) A person who reviews, analyzes, or reports on the technology solely for an investigation or inquiry concerning the accuracy or integrity of the technology pursuant to clause (i) or (ii). (D) Requirements for nondisclosure agreements A nondisclosure agreement entered into with respect to an election-dedicated voting system technology meets the requirements of this subparagraph if the agreement— (i) is limited in scope to coverage of the technology disclosed under subparagraph (B) and any trade secrets and intellectual property rights related thereto; (ii) does not prohibit a signatory from entering into other nondisclosure agreements to review other technologies under this paragraph; (iii) exempts from coverage both information the signatory lawfully obtained from another source and information in the public domain; (iv) remains in effect for not longer than the life of any trade secret or other intellectual property right related thereto; (v) prohibits the request or use of injunctions that bar a signatory from carrying out any activity authorized under subparagraph (C), including injunctions limited to the period prior to a judicial proceeding involving the technology; (vi) is silent as to damages awarded for breach of the agreement, other than a reference to damages available under applicable law; (vii) allows disclosure of evidence relating to possible criminal conduct or other violations of law, including in response to a subpoena or warrant; (viii) allows disclosures and testimony to legislative branch authorities, judicial proceedings, and executive branch investigations in response to a subpoena or warrant or as otherwise provided by law; and (ix) provides that the agreement shall be governed by the trade secret laws of the applicable State. (E) Election-dedicated voting system technology defined For purposes of this paragraph: (i) In general The term election-dedicated voting system technology (I) The source code used for the trusted build and the file signatures for the trusted build. (II) A complete disk image of the pre-build, build environment, and any file signatures to validate that it is unmodified. (III) A complete disk image of the post-build, build environment, and any file signatures to validate that it is unmodified. (IV) All executable code produced by the trusted build and any file signatures to validate that it is unmodified. (V) Installation devices and software file signatures. (ii) Exclusion Such term does not include commercial-off-the-shelf (F) Trusted build defined For purposes of this paragraph, the term trusted build . (b) Effective Date The amendment made by this section shall apply with respect to elections occurring during 2016 or any succeeding year. (c) Authorization of appropriations for national institute of standards and technology There are authorized to be appropriated to the National Institute of Standards and Technology for each fiscal year such sums as may be necessary to enable the Institute, including the National Software Reference Library of the Institute, to carry out paragraph (7) of section 301(a) of the Help America Vote Act of 2002, as added by section 2(a).

Summary: Verifying Optimal Tools for Elections Act of 2016 or the VOTE Act of 2016 This bill amends the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to direct the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) to make a payment to each eligible state in which a precinct used at least one outdated voting machine to administer the regularly scheduled federal general election held in November 2012. A state shall use the funds from such a payment to replace outdated voting machines in qualifying precincts with voting machines that: (1) have never been used in any federal general election and are not outdated voting machines, or have been used only with respect to federal general elections held after November 2012; and (2) are auditable and meet specified requirements. A state receiving such a payment shall ensure that all the outdated voting machines in its qualifying precincts have been replaced in time for the regularly scheduled federal general election in November 2018. The EAC shall make grants to states for the education and training, through webinars or other appropriate means, of election officials and poll workers on matters including voting machine maintenance, pre- and post-election voting machine testing, and the development of contingency plans. The EAC shall also make grants to state or local governments to conduct pilot testing with respect to, and carry out the implementation of, voting systems that use: (1) non-proprietary open source software, and (2) commercial or custom firmware and hardware. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) shall develop, or fund the development of, a common data format allowing for voting-equipment device interoperability. A voting system used in a federal election in a state may not at any time during the election contain or use any election-dedicated voting system technology that is not deposited by the state with the NIST National Software Reference Library before the election.