Multiple Substance Impaired Driving Prevention Act of 2021

To amend title 23, United States Code, to authorize the use of certain Federal funds for multiple substance impaired driving countermeasures, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Multiple Substance Impaired Driving Prevention Act of 2021 2. Sense of Congress; purpose (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) a priority should be placed on creating State systems, programs, and processes that improve impaired driving detection in cases in which alcohol, drugs, and especially multiple substances are involved; (2) States and communities should have access to a broader range of countermeasures, technologies, and resources to address multiple substance impaired driving; and (3) increased Federal funding should be made available for efforts to improve public safety through the approaches described in paragraphs (1) and (2). (b) Purpose The purpose of this Act is to increase national investment in, and maximize the use of, innovative programs and technologies to eliminate multiple substance impaired driving. 3. Impaired driving prevention and reporting (a) Use of funds for multiple substance impaired driving Section 164(b)(1) of title 23, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking for alcohol-impaired (i) alcohol-impaired driving countermeasures; or (ii) single or multiple substance impaired . (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking intoxicated (i) the purchase of equipment dedicated to the enforcement of those laws; (ii) the training of officers dedicated to the enforcement of those laws; and (iii) the use of additional personnel for specific— (I) alcohol-impaired driving countermeasures; or (II) single or multiple substance impaired driving countermeasures. . (b) Impaired driving countermeasures Section 405(d) of title 23, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (4)— (A) in subparagraph (B)— (i) by striking clause (iii) and inserting the following: (iii) (I) court support of high-visibility enforcement efforts; (II) hiring criminal justice professionals, including law enforcement officers, prosecutors, traffic safety resource prosecutors, judges, judicial outreach liaisons, and probation officers; (III) training and education of the criminal justice professionals described in subclause (II) to assist those professionals in preventing impaired driving and handling impaired driving cases, including by providing compensation to a law enforcement officer to replace a law enforcement officer who is— (aa) receiving drug recognition expert training; or (bb) participating as an instructor in drug recognition expert training; and (IV) establishing driving while intoxicated courts; ; (ii) by striking clauses (v) and (vi) and inserting the following: (v) improving— (I) blood alcohol concentration screening and testing; (II) the detection of potentially impairing drugs, including through the use of oral fluid as a specimen; and (III) reporting relating to the screening, testing, and detection described in subclauses (I) and (II); (vi) (I) paid and earned media in support of high-visibility enforcement efforts; (II) conducting initial and continuing— (aa) standardized field sobriety training, advanced roadside impaired driving enforcement training, and drug recognition expert training for law enforcement; and (bb) law enforcement phlebotomy training; and (III) purchasing equipment to carry out impaired driving enforcement activities authorized by this subsection; ; (iii) in clause (ix), by striking and (iv) in clause (x), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and (v) by adding at the end the following: (xi) testing and implementing programs and purchasing technologies to better identify, monitor, or treat impaired drivers, including— (I) oral fluid screening technologies; (II) electronic warrant programs; (III) equipment to increase the scope, quantity, quality, and timeliness of forensic toxicology chemical testing; (IV) case management software to support the management of impaired driving offenders; and (V) technology to monitor impaired driving offenders. ; and (B) in subparagraph (C)— (i) in the second sentence, by striking Medium-range (ii) Medium-range and high-range States Subject to clause (iii), medium-range ; (ii) in the first sentence, by striking Low-range (i) Low-range States Subject to clause (iii), low-range ; and (iii) by adding at the end the following: (iii) All States (I) Reporting of impaired driving information A State may use grant funds for any expenditure designed to increase the timely and accurate reporting of impaired driving crash information, including electronic crash reporting systems that allow accurate real- or near-real-time uploading of crash information, and impaired driving criminal justice information to Federal, State, and local databases. (II) Impaired driving countermeasures A State may use grant funds for any expenditure to research or evaluate impaired driving countermeasures. ; and (2) in paragraph (7)(A), in the matter preceding clause (i), by inserting or local authorizes a State (c) GAO study on national DUI reporting (1) In general The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on the reporting of impaired driving arrest and citation data to Federal databases and the interstate sharing of information about convictions and license suspensions relating to impaired driving to facilitate the widespread identification of repeat impaired driving offenders. (2) Inclusions The study conducted under paragraph (1) shall include a detailed assessment of— (A) the extent to which State and local criminal justice agencies are reporting impaired driving arrest and citation data to Federal databases; (B) any barriers— (i) at the Federal, State, or local level to the reporting of impaired driving arrest and citation data to Federal databases; and (ii) to the use by State and local criminal justice agencies of— (I) those databases; and (II) any systems for the reporting of that data; (C) the extent to which States are sharing impaired driving conviction and license-suspension data; (D) any barriers at the Federal, State, or local level to the sharing of impaired driving conviction and license-suspension data; (E) any Federal, State, and local resources available to improve the reporting and sharing of impaired driving data; (F) any recommendations for policies and programs to be carried out by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to improve— (i) the reporting of impaired driving arrest and citation data to Federal databases; or (ii) the interstate sharing of impaired driving conviction and license-suspension data; and (G) any recommendations for programs or grant funding to be authorized by Congress to improve— (i) the reporting of impaired driving arrest and citation data to Federal databases; or (ii) the interstate sharing of impaired driving conviction and license-suspension data. (3) Report Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the results of the study conducted under paragraph (1).

Summary: Multiple Substance Impaired Driving Prevention Act of 2021 This bill includes substances other than alcohol within the scope of federal programs for preventing impaired driving. It also addresses reporting of impaired driving arrests, citations, convictions, and related matters to federal and other databases. Under current law, if a state does not have (or enforce) certain laws to address repeat intoxicated drivers, a portion of that state's Federal-aid highway funding must be reserved for alcohol-related countermeasures for impaired driving. This bill provides that reserved funds may also be used for countermeasures for single or multiple substance impaired driving. Additionally, states may use grants for impaired driving countermeasures to improve (1) reporting of information about crashes and impaired driving to federal, state, and local databases; and (2) research using such information. The Government Accountability Office must also study the extent to which states and localities report information about impaired driving to relevant federal databases and use the databases to identify repeat impaired driving offenders.