National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024

To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2024 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes. 1. Short title; table of contents (a) Short title This Act may be cited as the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (b) Table of contents The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents. Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees. Sec. 4. Budgetary effects of this Act. DIVISION A—Department of Defense authorizations TITLE I—Procurement Subtitle A—Authorization of appropriations Sec. 101. Authorization of appropriations. Subtitle B—Army programs Sec. 111. Report on Army requirements and acquisition strategy for night vision devices. Sec. 112. Army plan for ensuring sources of cannon tubes. Sec. 113. Strategy for Army tactical wheeled vehicle program. Sec. 114. Extension and modification of annual updates to master plans and investment strategies for Army ammunition plants. Sec. 115. Report on acquisition strategies of the logistics augmentation program of the Army. Subtitle C—Navy programs Sec. 121. Reduction in the minimum number of Navy carrier air wings and carrier air wing headquarters required to be maintained. Sec. 122. Extension of prohibition on availability of funds for Navy port waterborne security barriers. Sec. 123. Multiyear procurement authority for Virginia class submarine program. Subtitle D—Air Force programs Sec. 131. Limitations and minimum inventory requirement relating to RQ–4 aircraft. Sec. 132. Limitation on divestiture of T–1A training aircraft. Sec. 133. Modification to minimum inventory requirement for A–10 aircraft. Sec. 134. Modification to minimum requirement for total primary mission aircraft inventory of Air Force fighter aircraft. Sec. 135. Modification of limitation on divestment of F–15 aircraft. Sec. 136. Report on Air Force executive aircraft. Subtitle E—Defense-wide, joint, and multiservice matters Sec. 141. Pilot program to accelerate the procurement and fielding of innovative technologies. Sec. 142. Requirement to develop and implement policies to establish the datalink strategy of the Department of Defense. Sec. 143. Report on contract for cybersecurity capabilities and briefing. TITLE II—Research, development, test, and evaluation Subtitle A—Authorization of appropriations Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations. Subtitle B—Program requirements, restrictions, and limitations Sec. 211. Updated guidance on planning for exportability features for future programs. Sec. 212. Support to the Defence Innovation Accelerator for the North Atlantic. Sec. 213. Modification to personnel management authority to attract experts in science and engineering. Sec. 214. Administration of the Advanced Sensors Application Program. Sec. 215. Delegation of responsibility for certain research programs. Sec. 216. Program of standards and requirements for microelectronics. Sec. 217. Clarifying role of partnership intermediaries to promote defense research and education. Sec. 218. Competition for technology that detects and watermarks the use of generative artificial intelligence. Subtitle C—Plans, reports, and other matters Sec. 221. Department of Defense prize competitions for business systems modernization. Sec. 222. Update to plans and strategies for artificial intelligence. Sec. 223. Western regional range complex demonstration. Sec. 224. Report on feasibility and advisability of establishing a quantum computing innovation center. Sec. 225. Briefing on the impediments to the transition of the Semantic Forensics program to operational use. Sec. 226. Annual report on Department of Defense hypersonic capability funding and investment. Sec. 227. Limitation on availability of funds for travel for office of Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness pending a plan for modernizing Defense Travel System. Sec. 228. Annual report on unfunded priorities for research, development, test, and evaluation activities. TITLE III—Operation and Maintenance Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 301. Authorization of appropriations. Subtitle B—Energy and Environment Sec. 311. Requirement for approval by Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment of any waiver for a system that does not meet fuel efficiency key performance parameter. Sec. 312. Improvement and codification of Sentinel Landscapes Partnership program authority. Sec. 313. Modification of definition of sustainable aviation fuel for purpose of pilot program on use of such fuel. Sec. 314. Payment to Environmental Protection Agency of stipulated penalties in connection with Naval Air Station Moffett Field, California. Sec. 315. Technical assistance for communities and individuals potentially affected by releases at current and former Department of Defense facilities. Subtitle C—Treatment of Perfluoroalkyl Substances and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Sec. 321. Treatment of certain materials contaminated with perfluoroalkyl substances or polyfluoroalkyl substances. Sec. 322. Increase of transfer authority for funding of study and assessment on health implications of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances contamination in drinking water by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Sec. 323. Modification of authority for environmental restoration projects at National Guard facilities. Sec. 324. Limitation on availability of travel funds until submittal of plan for restoring data sharing on testing of water for perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances. Sec. 325. Dashboard of funding relating to perfluoroalkyl substances and polyfluoroalkyl substances. Sec. 326. Report on schedule and cost estimates for completion of testing and remediation of contaminated sites and publication of cleanup information. Sec. 327. Modification of timing of report on activities of PFAS Task Force. Sec. 328. Government Accountability Office report on testing and remediation of perfluoroalkyl substances and polyfluoroalkyl substances. Subtitle D—Logistics and Sustainment Sec. 331. Assuring Critical Infrastructure Support for Military Contingencies Pilot Program. Sec. 332. Strategy and assessment on use of automation and artificial intelligence for shipyard optimization. Subtitle E—Briefings and Reports Sec. 341. Critical infrastructure conditions at military installations. Sec. 342. Report on establishing sufficient stabling, pasture, and training area for the Old Guard Caisson Platoon equines. Sec. 343. Quarterly briefings on operational status of amphibious warship fleet of Department of the Navy. Sec. 344. Briefing on plan for maintaining proficiency in emergency movement of munitions in Joint Region Marianas, Guam. Subtitle F—Other Matters Sec. 351. Continued designation of Secretary of the Navy as executive agent for Naval Small Craft Instruction and Technical Training School. Sec. 352. Restriction on retirement of U–28 Aircraft. Sec. 353. Tribal liaisons. Sec. 354. Limitation on use of funds to expand leased facilities for the Joint Military Information Support Operations Web Operations Center. Sec. 355. Modifications to the Contested Logistics Working Group of the Department of Defense. Sec. 356. Establishment of Caisson Platoon to support military and State funeral services. Sec. 357. Limitation on availability of funds pending 30-year shipbuilding plan that maintains 31 amphibious warships for the Department of the Navy. Sec. 358. Modification of rule of construction regarding provision of support and services to non-Department of Defense organizations and activities. TITLE IV—Military personnel authorizations Subtitle A—Active forces Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces. Sec. 402. End strength level matters. Sec. 403. Extension of additional authority to vary Space Force end strength. Subtitle B—Reserve forces Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve. Sec. 412 . End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the Reserves. Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status). Sec. 414. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support. Subtitle C—Authorization of appropriations Sec. 421. Military personnel. TITLE V—Military personnel policy Subtitle A—Officer personnel policy Sec. 501. Authorized strength: general and flag officers on active duty. Sec. 502. Prohibition on appointment or nomination of certain officers who are subject to special selection review boards. Sec. 503. Exclusion of officers who are licensed behavioral health providers from limitations on active duty commissioned officer end strengths. Sec. 504. Updating authority to authorize promotion transfers between components of the same service or a different service. Sec. 505. Effect of failure of selection for promotion. Sec. 506. Permanent authority to order retired members to active duty in high-demand, low-density appointments. Sec. 507. Waiver authority expansion for the extension of service obligation for Marine Corps cyberspace operations officers. Sec. 508. Removal of active duty prohibition for members of the Air Force Reserve Policy Committee. Sec. 509. Extension of authority to vary number of Space Force officers considered for promotion to major general. Sec. 510. Realignment of Navy spot-promotion quotas. Sec. 511. Modification of limitation on promotion selection board rates. Sec. 512. Time in grade requirements. Sec. 513. Flexibility in determining terms of appointment for certain senior officer positions. Subtitle B—Reserve component management Sec. 521. Alternative promotion authority for reserve officers in designated competitive categories. Sec. 522. Selected Reserve and Ready Reserve order to active duty to respond to a significant cyber incident. Sec. 523. Mobilization of Selected Reserve for preplanned missions in support of the combatant commands. Sec. 524. Alternating selection of officers of the National Guard and the Reserves as deputy commanders of certain combatant commands. Sec. 525. Grade of Vice Chief of the National Guard Bureau. Subtitle C—General service authorities and military records Sec. 531. Modification of limitation on enlistment and induction of persons whose score on the Armed Forces Qualification Test is below a prescribed level. Sec. 532. Non-medical counseling services for military families. Sec. 533. Primacy of needs of the service in determining individual duty assignments. Sec. 534. Requirement to use qualifications, performance, and merit as basis for promotions, assignments, and other personnel actions. Sec. 535. Requirement to base treatment in the military on merit and performance. Sec. 536. Tiger team for outreach to former members. Sec. 537. Diversity, equity, and inclusion personnel grade cap. Subtitle D—Military justice and other legal matters Sec. 541. Establishment of staggered terms for members of the Military Justice Review Panel. Sec. 542. Technical and conforming amendments to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Subtitle E—Member Education, Training, Transition Sec. 551. Future servicemember preparatory course. Sec. 552. Determination of active duty service commitment for recipients of fellowships, grants, and scholarships. Sec. 553. Military service academy professional sports pathway report and legislative proposal required. Sec. 554. Community college Enlisted Training Corps demonstration program. Sec. 555. Language training centers for members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense. Sec. 556. Limitation on availability of funds for relocation of Army CID special agent training course. Sec. 557. Army Physical Fitness Test. Sec. 558. Opt-out sharing of information on members retiring or separating from the Armed Forces with community-based organizations and related entities. Sec. 559. Establishment of program to promote participation of foreign students in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps. Sec. 560. Consideration of standardized test scores in military service academy application process. Subtitle F—Military Family Readiness and Dependents' Education Sec. 561. Pilot program on recruitment and retention of employees for child development programs. Sec. 562. Certain assistance to local educational agencies that benefit dependents of military and civilian personnel. Sec. 563. Modifications to assistance to local educational agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces with enrollment changes due to base closures, force structure changes, or force relocations. Sec. 564. Assistance for military spouses to obtain doula certifications. Subtitle G—Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps Sec. 571. Expansion of Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps. Sec. 572. JROTC program certification. Sec. 573. Memorandum of understanding required. Sec. 574. Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps instructor compensation. Sec. 575. Annual report on allegations of sexual misconduct in JROTC programs. Sec. 576. Comptroller General report on efforts to increase transparency and reporting on sexual violence in the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps Program. Subtitle H—Decorations and other awards, miscellaneous reports and other matters Sec. 581. Extension of deadline for review of World War I valor medals. Sec. 582. Prohibition on former members of the Armed Forces accepting post-service employment with certain foreign governments. Sec. 583. Prohibition on requiring listing of gender or pronouns in official correspondence. Subtitle I—Enhanced recruiting efforts Sec. 591. Short title. Sec. 592. Increased access to potential recruits at secondary schools. Sec. 593. Increased access to potential recruits at institutions of higher education. TITLE VI—COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances Sec. 601. Pay of members of reserve components for inactive-duty training to obtain or maintain an aeronautical rating or designation. Sec. 602. Modification of calculation method for basic allowance for housing to more accurately assess housing costs of junior members of uniformed services. Sec. 603. Basic allowance for housing for members assigned to vessels undergoing maintenance. Sec. 604. Dual basic allowance for housing for training for certain members of reserve components. Sec. 605. Modification of calculation of gross household income for basic needs allowance to address areas of demonstrated need. Sec. 606. Expansion of eligibility for reimbursement of qualified licensure, certification, and business relocation costs incurred by military spouses. Sec. 607. Cost-of-living allowance in the continental United States: high cost areas. Sec. 608. OCONUS cost-of-living allowance: adjustments. Sec. 609. Extension of one-time uniform allowance for officers who transfer to the Space Force. Sec. 610. Review of rates of military basic pay. Sec. 611. Government Accountability Office study on process for determining cost-of-living allowances for members of the uniformed services assigned to the continental United States, Hawaii, Alaska, and overseas locations. Subtitle B—Bonus and Incentive Pays Sec. 621. Modification of special and incentive pay authorities for members of reserve components. Sec. 622. Expansion of continuation pay eligibility. Sec. 623. One-year extension of certain expiring bonus and special pay authorities. Sec. 624. Requirement to establish remote and austere condition assignment incentive pay program for Air Force. Subtitle C—Other Matters Sec. 631. Modification of requirements for approval of foreign employment by retired and reserve members of uniformed services. Sec. 632. Restrictions on retired and reserve members of the Armed Forces receiving employment and compensation indirectly from foreign governments through private entities. TITLE VII—Health Care Provisions Subtitle A—TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits Sec. 701. Extension of period of eligibility for health benefits under TRICARE Reserve Select for survivors of a member of the Selected Reserve. Sec. 702. Authority to provide dental care for dependents located at certain remote or isolated locations. Sec. 703. Inclusion of assisted reproductive technology and artificial insemination as required primary and preventive health care services for members of the uniformed services and dependents. Sec. 704. Program on treatment of members of the Armed Forces for post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injuries, and co-occurring disorders related to military sexual trauma. Sec. 705. Waiver of cost-sharing for three mental health outpatient visits for certain beneficiaries under the TRICARE program. Sec. 706. Expansion of doula care furnished by Department of Defense. Subtitle B—Health Care Administration Sec. 711. Increase in stipend for participants in health professions scholarship and financial assistance programs. Sec. 712. Financial relief for civilians treated in military medical treatment facilities. Sec. 713. Department of Defense Overdose Data Act of 2023. Sec. 714. Modification of administration of medical malpractice claims by members of the uniformed services. Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters Sec. 721. Modification of partnership program between United States and Ukraine for military trauma care and research. Sec. 722. Requirement that Department of Defense disclose expert reports with respect to medical malpractice claims by members of the uniformed services. Sec. 723. Comptroller General study on impact of perinatal mental health conditions of members of the Armed Forces and their dependents on military readiness and retention. Sec. 724. Report on mental and behavioral health services provided by Department of Defense. Sec. 725. Report on activities of Department of Defense to prevent, intervene, and treat perinatal mental health conditions of members of the Armed Forces and their dependents. Sec. 726. Study on family planning and cryopreservation of gametes to improve retention of members of the Armed Forces. TITLE VIII—Acquisition policy, acquisition management, and related matters Subtitle A—Acquisition policy and management Sec. 801. Amendments to multiyear procurement authority. Sec. 802. Modernizing the Department of Defense requirements process. Sec. 803. Head of Contracting Authority for Strategic Capabilities Office. Sec. 804. Pilot program for the use of innovative intellectual property strategies. Sec. 805. Focused commercial solutions openings opportunities. Sec. 806. Study on reducing barriers to acquisition of commercial products and services. Sec. 807. Sense of the Senate on independent cost assessment. Sec. 808. Emergency acquisition authority for purposes of replenishing United States stockpiles. Subtitle B—Amendments to general contracting authorities, procedures, and limitations Sec. 811. Commander initiated rapid contracting actions. Sec. 812. Extension and revisions to never contract with the enemy. Sec. 813. Enhancement of Department of Defense capabilities to prevent contractor fraud. Sec. 814. Modification of approval authority for high dollar other transaction agreements for prototypes. Sec. 815. Modifications to Earned Value Management system requirements. Sec. 816. Inventory of inflation and escalation indices. Sec. 817. Pilot program to incentivize progress payments. Sec. 818. Extension of pilot program to accelerate contracting and pricing processes. Sec. 819. Preventing conflicts of interest for Department of Defense consultants. Sec. 820. Prohibition on requiring defense contractors to provide information relating to greenhouse gas emissions. Sec. 821. Prohibition on contracts for the provision of online tutoring services by entities owned by the People's Republic of China. Sec. 822. Modification of truthful cost or pricing data submissions and report. Subtitle C—Industrial base matters Sec. 831. Defense industrial base advanced capabilities pilot program. Sec. 832. Department of Defense notification of certain transactions. Sec. 833. Analyses of certain activities for action to address sourcing and industrial capacity. Sec. 834. Pilot program on capital assistance to support defense investment in the industrial base. Sec. 835. Requirement to buy certain satellite components from national technology and industrial base. Subtitle D—Small business matters Sec. 841. Amendments to Defense Research and Development Rapid Innovation Program. Sec. 842. Department of Defense Mentor-Protégé Program. Sec. 843. Consideration of the past performance of affiliate companies of small businesses. Sec. 844. Timely payments for Department of Defense small business subcontractors. Sec. 845. Extension of Pilot Program for streamlined technology transition from the SBIR and STTR Programs of the Department of Defense. Sec. 846. Annual reports regarding the SBIR program of the Department of Defense. Sec. 847. Modifications to the Procurement Technical Assistance Program. Sec. 848. Extension of pilot program to incentivize contracting with employee-owned businesses. Subtitle E—Other matters Sec. 861. Limitation on the availability of funds pending a plan for implementing the replacement for the Selected Acquisition Reporting system. Sec. 862. Extension of pilot program for distribution support and services for weapons systems contractors. Sec. 863. Modification of effective date for expansion on the prohibition on acquiring certain metal products. Sec. 864. Foreign sources of specialty metals. Sec. 865. University Affiliated Research Center for critical minerals. TITLE IX—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT Subtitle A—Office of the Secretary of Defense and Related Matters Sec. 901. Establishment of Office of Strategic Capital. Sec. 902. Reinstatement of position of Chief Management Officer of Department of Defense. Sec. 903. Modification of responsibilities of Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. Sec. 904. Roles and responsibilities for components of Office of Secretary of Defense for joint all-domain command and control in support of integrated joint warfighting. Sec. 905. Principal Deputy Assistant Secretaries to support Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict. Sec. 906. Modification of cross-functional team to address emerging threat relating to directed energy capabilities. Sec. 907. Pilot program on protecting access to critical assets. Sec. 908. Extension of mission management pilot program. Sec. 909. Conforming amendments to carry out elimination of position of Chief Management Officer. Subtitle B—Other Department of Defense Organization and Management Matters Sec. 921. Joint Energetics Transition Office. Sec. 922. Transition of oversight responsibility for the Defense Technology Security Administration. Sec. 923. Integrated and authenticated access to Department of Defense systems for certain congressional staff for oversight purposes. Sec. 924. Integration of productivity software suites for scheduling data. Sec. 925. Operationalizing audit readiness. Sec. 926. Next generation business health metrics. Sec. 927. Independent assessment of defense business enterprise architecture. Sec. 928. Limitation on establishment of new diversity, equity, and inclusion positions; hiring freeze. TITLE X—General provisions Subtitle A—Financial matters Sec. 1001. General transfer authority. Sec. 1002. Annual report on budget prioritization by Secretary of Defense and military departments. Sec. 1003. Additional reporting requirements related to unfunded priorities. Sec. 1004. Sense of the Senate on need for emergency supplemental appropriations. Subtitle B—Counterdrug activities Sec. 1011. Disruption of fentanyl trafficking. Sec. 1012. Enhanced support for counterdrug activities and activities to counter transnational organized crime. Sec. 1013. Modification of support for counterdrug activities and activities to counter transnational organized crime: increase in cap for small scale construction projects. Sec. 1014. Building the capacity of armed forces of Mexico to counter the threat posed by transnational criminal organizations. Subtitle C—Naval vessels Sec. 1021. Modification of authority to purchase used vessels under the National Defense Sealift Fund. Sec. 1022. Amphibious warship force availability. Sec. 1023. Prohibition on retirement of certain naval vessels. Sec. 1024. Report on the potential for an Army and Navy joint effort for watercraft vessels. Subtitle D—Counterterrorism Sec. 1031. Extension of prohibition on use of funds to close or relinquish control of United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Sec. 1032. Extension of prohibition on use of funds for transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States. Sec. 1033. Extension of prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the United States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Sec. 1034. Extension of prohibition on use of funds for transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to certain countries. Subtitle E—Miscellaneous authorities and limitations Sec. 1041. Extension of admission to Guam or the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands for certain nonimmigrant H–2B workers. Sec. 1042. Authority to include funding requests for the chemical and biological defense program in budget accounts of military departments. Sec. 1043. Unfavorable security clearance eligibility determinations and appeals. Sec. 1044. Assistance in support of Department of Defense accounting for missing United States Government personnel. Sec. 1045. Implementation of arrangements to build transparency, confidence, and security. Sec. 1046. Access to and use of military post offices by United States citizens employed overseas by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization who perform functions in support of military operations of the Armed Forces. Sec. 1047. Removal of time limitations of temporary protection and authorization of reimbursement for security services and equipment for former or retired Department of Defense personnel. Sec. 1048. Annual Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) capabilities required to expand accounting for persons missing from designated past conflicts. Subtitle F—Studies and reports Sec. 1051. Annual report and briefing on implementation of Force Design 2030. Sec. 1052. Plan for conversion of Joint Task Force North into Joint Interagency Task Force North. Sec. 1053. Report on use of tactical fighter aircraft and bomber aircraft for deployments and homeland defense missions. Sec. 1054. Modifications of reporting requirements. Sec. 1055. Report on equipping certain ground combat units with small unmanned aerial systems. Sec. 1056. Comprehensive assessment of Marine Corps Force Design 2030. Sec. 1057. Strategy to achieve critical mineral supply chain independence for the Department of Defense. Sec. 1058. Quarterly briefing on homeland defense planning. Sec. 1059. Special operations force structure. Sec. 1060. Briefing on commercial tools employed by the Department of Defense to assess foreign ownership, control, or influence. Sec. 1061. Plan on countering human trafficking. Sec. 1062. Briefing and report on use and effectiveness of United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Subtitle G—Other matters Sec. 1071. Matters related to irregular warfare. Sec. 1072. Joint concept for competing implementation updates. Sec. 1073. Limitation on certain funding until submission of the Chairman’s Risk Assessment and briefing requirement. Sec. 1074. Notification of safety and security concerns at certain Department of Defense laboratories. Sec. 1075. Assessment and recommendations relating to infrastructure, capacity, resources, and personnel in Guam. Sec. 1076. Program and processes relating to foreign acquisition. Sec. 1077. Technical and conforming amendments related to the Space Force. Sec. 1078. Authority to establish commercial integration cells within certain combatant commands. Sec. 1079. Modification on limitation on funding for institutions of higher education hosting Confucius Institutes. Sec. 1080. Modification of definition of domestic source for title III of Defense Production Act of 1950. Sec. 1081. Comprehensive strategy for talent development and management of Department of Defense computer programming workforce. Sec. 1082. Limitation on availability of funds for destruction of landmines. TITLE XI—Civilian personnel matters Sec. 1101. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees working overseas. Sec. 1102. One-year extension of temporary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to civilian personnel on official duty in a combat zone. Sec. 1103. Exclusion of positions in nonappropriated fund instrumentalities from limitations on dual pay. Sec. 1104. Exception to limitation on number of Senior Executive Service positions for the Department of Defense. Sec. 1105. Removal of Washington Headquarters Services direct support from personnel limitation on the Office of the Secretary of Defense. Sec. 1106. Consolidation of direct hire authorities for candidates with specified degrees at science and technology reinvention laboratories. Sec. 1107. Expansion and extension of direct hire authority for certain personnel of the Department of Defense. Sec. 1108. Extension of direct hire authority for the Department of Defense for post-secondary students and recent graduates. Sec. 1109. Extension of direct hire authority for domestic industrial base facilities and Major Range and Test Facilities Base. Sec. 1110. Authority to employ civilian faculty members at Space Force schools. Sec. 1111. Report and sunset relating to inapplicability of certification of executive qualifications by qualification review boards of Office of Personnel Management. Sec. 1112. Extension of date of first employment for acquisition of competitive status for employees of Inspectors General for overseas contingency operations. Sec. 1113. Expansion of noncompetitive appointment eligibility to spouses of Department of Defense civilians. Sec. 1114. Elimination of Government Accountability Office review requirement relating to Department of Defense personnel authorities. Sec. 1115. Amendments to the John S. McCain Strategic Defense Fellows Program. Sec. 1116. Civilian Cybersecurity Reserve pilot project. TITLE XII—Matters relating to foreign nations Subtitle A—Assistance and training Sec. 1201. Middle East integrated maritime domain awareness and interdiction capability. Sec. 1202. Authority to provide mission training through distributed simulation. Sec. 1203. Increase in small-scale construction limit and modification of authority to build capacity. Sec. 1204. Extension of legal institutional capacity building initiative for foreign defense institutions. Sec. 1205. Extension and modification of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations. Sec. 1206. Extension of authority for Department of Defense support for stabilization activities in national security interest of the United States. Sec. 1207. Extension of cross servicing agreements for loan of personnel protection and personnel survivability equipment in coalition operations. Sec. 1208. Limitation on availability of funds for International Security Cooperation Program. Sec. 1209. Modification of Department of Defense security cooperation workforce development. Sec. 1210. Modification of authority to provide support to certain governments for border security operations. Sec. 1211. Modification of Defense Operational Resilience International Cooperation Pilot Program. Sec. 1212. Assistance to Israel for aerial refueling. Subtitle B—Matters relating to Syria, Iraq, and Iran Sec. 1221. Extension and modification of authority to provide assistance to vetted Syrian groups and individuals. Sec. 1222. Extension of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq. Sec. 1223. Extension and modification of authority to provide assistance to counter the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. Sec. 1224. Briefing on nuclear capability of Iran. Subtitle C—Matters relating to Europe and the Russian Federation Sec. 1231. Extension and modification of Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative. Sec. 1232. Extension and modification of training for Eastern European national security forces in the course of multilateral exercises. Sec. 1233. Extension of prohibition on availability of funds relating to sovereignty of the Russian Federation over internationally recognized territory of Ukraine. Sec. 1234. Extension and modification of temporary authorizations related to Ukraine and other matters. Sec. 1235. Prioritization for basing, training, and exercises in North Atlantic Treaty Organization member countries. Sec. 1236. Study and report on lessons learned regarding information operations and deterrence. Sec. 1237. Report on progress on multi-year strategy and plan for Baltic security cooperation. Sec. 1238. Sense of the Senate on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Sec. 1239. Sense of the Senate on Defence Innovation Accelerator for the North Atlantic (DIANA) in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Sec. 1240. Sense of the Senate regarding the arming of Ukraine. Subtitle D—Matters relating to the Indo-Pacific region Sec. 1241. Indo-Pacific Campaigning Initiative. Sec. 1242. Training, advising, and institutional capacity-building program for military forces of Taiwan. Sec. 1243. Indo-Pacific Maritime Domain Awareness Initiative. Sec. 1244. Extension of Pacific Deterrence Initiative. Sec. 1245. Extension of authority to transfer funds for Bien Hoa dioxin cleanup. Sec. 1246. Extension and modification of pilot program to improve cyber cooperation with foreign military partners in Southeast Asia. Sec. 1247. Extension and modification of certain temporary authorizations. Sec. 1248. Plan for enhanced security cooperation with Japan. Sec. 1249. Plan for improvements to certain operating locations in Indo-Pacific region. Sec. 1250. Strategy for improving posture of ground-based theater-range missiles in Indo-Pacific region. Sec. 1251. Enhancing major defense partnership with India. Sec. 1252. Military cybersecurity cooperation with Taiwan. Sec. 1253. Designation of senior official for Department of Defense activities relating to, and implementation plan for, security partnership among Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Sec. 1254. Report and notification relating to transfer of operational control on Korean Peninsula. Sec. 1255. Report on range of consequences of war with the People’s Republic of China. Sec. 1256. Study and report on command structure and force posture of United States Armed Forces in Indo-Pacific region. Sec. 1257. Studies on defense budget transparency of the People’s Republic of China and the United States. Sec. 1258. Briefing on provision of security assistance by the People’s Republic of China and summary of Department of Defense mitigation activities. Sec. 1259. Semiannual briefings on bilateral agreements supporting United States military posture in the Indo-Pacific region. Sec. 1260. Semiannual briefings on military of the People's Republic of China. Sec. 1261. Prohibition on use of funds to support entertainment projects with ties to the Government of the People's Republic of China. Sec. 1262. Prohibition on use of funds for the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Sec. 1263. Audit to identify diversion of Department of Defense funding to China's research labs. Sec. 1264. Prohibiting Federal funding for EcoHealth Alliance Inc. Sec. 1265. Assessment relating to contingency operational plan of United States Indo-Pacific Command. Sec. 1266. Assessment of absorptive capacity of military forces of Taiwan. Sec. 1267. Analysis of risks and implications of potential sustained military blockade of Taiwan by the People's Republic of China. Sec. 1268. Sense of the Senate on defense alliances and partnerships in the Indo-Pacific region. Subtitle E—Securing maritime data from China Sec. 1271. Short title. Sec. 1272. LOGINK defined. Sec. 1273. Countering the spread of LOGINK. Subtitle F—Reports Sec. 1281. Report on Department of Defense roles and responsibilities in support of National Strategy for the Arctic Region. Subtitle G—Other matters Sec. 1291. Military intelligence collection and analysis partnerships. Sec. 1292. Collaboration with partner countries to develop and maintain military-wide transformational strategies for operational energy. Sec. 1293. Modification of support of special operations for irregular warfare. Sec. 1294. Modification of authority for expenditure of funds for clandestine activities that support operational preparation of the environment. Sec. 1295. Modification of initiative to support protection of national security academic researchers from undue influence and other security threats. Sec. 1296. Modification of authority for certain payments to redress injury and loss. Sec. 1297. Modification of authority for cooperation on directed energy capabilities. Sec. 1298. Modification of Arctic Security Initiative. Sec. 1299. Termination of authorization of non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities. Sec. 1299A. Extension of prohibition on in-flight refueling to non-United States aircraft that engage in hostilities in the ongoing civil war in Yemen. Sec. 1299B. Extension of United States-Israel anti-tunnel cooperation. Sec. 1299C. Prohibition on delegation of authority to designate foreign partner forces as eligible for the provision of collective self-defense support by United States Armed Forces. Sec. 1299D. Participation by military departments in interoperability programs with military forces of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. Sec. 1299E. Cooperation with allies and partners in Middle East on development of integrated regional cybersecurity architecture. Sec. 1299F. Foreign Advance Acquisition Account. Sec. 1299G. Limitation on availability of funds for travel expenses of the Office of the Secretary of Defense. Sec. 1299H. Plans related to rapid transfer of certain missiles and defense capabilities. Sec. 1299I. Ensuring peace through strength in Israel. Sec. 1299J. Improvements to security cooperation workforce and defense acquisition workforce. Sec. 1299K. Modification of foreign military sales processing. TITLE XIII—COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION Sec. 1301. Cooperative Threat Reduction funds. TITLE XIV—Other authorizations Subtitle A—Military programs Sec. 1401. Working capital funds. Sec. 1402. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense. Sec. 1403. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. Sec. 1404. Defense Inspector General. Sec. 1405. Defense Health Program. Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile Sec. 1411. Recovery of rare earth elements and other strategic and critical materials through end-of-life equipment recycling. Sec. 1412. Improvements to Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act. Sec. 1413. Authority to dispose of materials from the National Defense Stockpile. Sec. 1414. Beginning balances of the National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund for audit purposes. Subtitle C—Other matters Sec. 1421. Authority for transfer of funds to joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois. Sec. 1422. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home. Sec. 1423. Modification of leasing authority of Armed Forces Retirement Home. TITLE XV—Space activities, strategic programs, and intelligence matters Subtitle A—Space activities Sec. 1501. Acquisition strategy for Phase 3 of the National Security Space Launch program. Sec. 1502. Initial operating capability for Advanced Tracking and Launch Analysis System and system-level review. Sec. 1503. Department of the Air Force responsibility for space-based ground and airborne moving target indication. Sec. 1504. Principal Military Deputy for Space Acquisition and Integration. Sec. 1505. Use of middle tier acquisition authority for Space Development Agency acquisition program. Sec. 1506. Special authority for provision of commercial space launch support services. Sec. 1507. Treatment of Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Resiliency, Modifications, and Improvements program as acquisition category 1D program. Sec. 1508. Briefing on classification practices and foreign disclosure policies required for combined space operations. Sec. 1509. Limitation on availability of certain funds relating to selection of permanent location for headquarters of United States Space Command. Subtitle B—Nuclear forces Sec. 1511. Prohibition on reduction of the intercontinental ballistic missiles of the United States. Sec. 1512. Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile program silo activity. Sec. 1513. Matters relating to the acquisition and deployment of the Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile weapon system. Sec. 1514. Plan for decreasing the time to upload additional warheads to the intercontinental ballistic missile fleet. Sec. 1515. Tasking and oversight authority with respect to intercontinental ballistic missile site activation task force for Sentinel Program. Sec. 1516. Long-term sustainment of Sentinel ICBM guidance system. Sec. 1517. Sense of Senate on Polaris Sales Agreement. Sec. 1518. Matters relating to the nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missile. Sec. 1519. Operational timeline for Strategic Automated Command and Control System. Sec. 1520. Amendment to annual report on the plan for the nuclear weapons stockpile, nuclear weapons complex, nuclear weapons delivery systems, and nuclear weapons command and control systems. Sec. 1521. Technical amendment to additional report matters on strategic delivery systems. Sec. 1522. Amendment to study of weapons programs that allow Armed Forces to address hard and deeply buried targets. Sec. 1523. Limitation on use of funds until provision of Department of Defense information to Government Accountability Office. Subtitle C—Missile defense Sec. 1531. Designation of official responsible for missile defense of Guam. Sec. 1532. Selection of a Director of the Missile Defense Agency. Sec. 1533. Modification of requirement for Comptroller General of the United States review and assessment of missile defense acquisition programs. Sec. 1534. Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system and Israeli cooperative missile defense program co-development and co-production. Sec. 1535. Modification of scope of program accountability matrices requirements for next generation interceptors for missile defense of the United States homeland. Sec. 1536. Limitation on availability of funds for Office of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation until submission of missile defense roles and responsibilities report. Sec. 1537. Integrated air and missile defense architecture for the Indo-Pacific region. Sec. 1538. Modification of National Missile Defense policy. Subtitle D—Other matters Sec. 1541. Electronic warfare. Sec. 1542. Study on the future of the Integrated Tactical Warning Attack Assessment System. Sec. 1543. Comprehensive review of electronic warfare test ranges and future capabilities. Sec. 1544. Extension of authorization for protection of certain facilities and assets from unmanned aircraft. Sec. 1545. Addressing serious deficiencies in electronic protection of systems that operate in the radio frequency spectrum. Sec. 1546. Funding limitation on certain unreported programs. Sec. 1547. Revision of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in commercial activities as security for intelligence collection activities. TITLE XVI—Cyberspace-related matters Subtitle A—Matters relating to cyber operations and cyber forces Sec. 1601. Measures to enhance the readiness and effectiveness of the Cyber Mission Force. Sec. 1602. Cyber intelligence center. Sec. 1603. Performance metrics for pilot program for sharing cyber capabilities and related information with foreign operational partners. Sec. 1604. Next generation cyber red teams. Sec. 1605. Management of data assets by Chief Digital Officer. Sec. 1606. Authority for countering illegal trafficking by Mexican transnational criminal organizations in cyberspace. Sec. 1607. Pilot program for cybersecurity collaboration center inclusion of semiconductor manufacturers. Sec. 1608. Independent evaluation regarding potential establishment of United States Cyber Force and further evolution of current model for management and execution of cyber mission. Subtitle B—Matters relating to Department of Defense cybersecurity and information technology Sec. 1611. Requirements for deployment of fifth generation information and communications capabilities to Department of Defense bases and facilities. Sec. 1612. Department of Defense information network boundary and cross-domain defense. Sec. 1613. Policy and guidance on memory-safe software programming. Sec. 1614. Development of regional cybersecurity strategies. Sec. 1615. Cyber incident reporting. Sec. 1616. Management by Department of Defense of mobile applications. Sec. 1617. Security enhancements for the nuclear command, control, and communications network. Sec. 1618. Guidance regarding securing laboratories of the Armed Forces. Sec. 1619. Establishing Identity, Credential, and Access Management initiative as a program of record. Sec. 1620. Strategy on cybersecurity resiliency of Department of Defense space enterprise. Sec. 1621. Requirements for implementation of user activity monitoring for cleared personnel and operational and information technology administrators and other privileged users. Sec. 1622. Department of Defense digital content provenance. Sec. 1623. Post-graduate employment of Cyber Service Academy scholarship recipients in intelligence community. Sec. 1624. Minimum number of scholarships to be awarded annually through Cyber Service Academy. TITLE XVII—Space Force personnel management Sec. 1701. Short title. Sec. 1702. Space Force Personnel Management Act transition plan. Sec. 1703. Comprehensive assessment of Space Force equities in the National Guard. Subtitle A—Space Force military personnel system without component Sec. 1711. Establishment of military personnel management system for the Space Force. Sec. 1712. Composition of the Space Force without component. Sec. 1713. Definitions for single personnel management system for the Space Force. Sec. 1714. Basic policies relating to service in the Space Force. Sec. 1715. Status and participation. Sec. 1716. Officers. Sec. 1717. Enlisted members. Sec. 1718. Retention and separation generally. Sec. 1719. Separation of officers for substandard performance of duty or for certain other reasons. Sec. 1720. Retirement. Subtitle B—Conforming amendments related to Space Force military personnel system Sec. 1731. Amendments to Department of the Air Force provisions of title 10, United States Code. Sec. 1732. Amendments to subtitle A of title 10, United States Code. Sec. 1733. Title 38, United States Code (veterans’ benefits). Subtitle C—Transition provisions Sec. 1741. Transition period. Sec. 1742. Change of duty status of members of the Space Force. Sec. 1743. Transfer to the Space Force of members of the Air Force Reserve and the Air National Guard. Sec. 1744. Placement of officers on the Space Force officer list. Sec. 1745. Disestablishment of regular Space Force. Sec. 1746. End strength flexibility. Sec. 1747. Promotion authority flexibility. Subtitle D—Other amendments related to the Space Force Sec. 1751. Title 10, United States Code. Sec. 1752. Other provisions of law. DIVISION B—Military construction authorizations Sec. 2001. Short title. Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law. Sec. 2003. Effective date. TITLE XXI—Army military construction Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2102. Family housing. Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army. Sec. 2104. Extension of authority to use cash payments in special account from land conveyance, Natick Soldier Systems Center, Massachusetts. Sec. 2105. Extension of authority to carry out fiscal year 2018 project at Kunsan Air Base, Korea. Sec. 2106. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2019 projects. Sec. 2107. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2021 projects. TITLE XXII—Navy military construction Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2202. Family housing. Sec. 2203. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. Sec. 2204. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2019 projects. Sec. 2205. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2021 projects. TITLE XXIII—Air Force military construction Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2302. Family housing. Sec. 2303. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force. Sec. 2304. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2017 projects. Sec. 2305. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2018 projects. Sec. 2306. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2019 projects. Sec. 2307. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2021 projects. TITLE XXIV—Defense Agencies military construction Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2402. Authorized Energy Resilience and Conservation Investment Program projects. Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies. Sec. 2404. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2018 projects. Sec. 2405. Extension and modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2019 projects. Sec. 2406. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2021 projects. Sec. 2407. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2022 projects. Sec. 2408. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2023 projects. TITLE XXV—International programs Subtitle A—North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO. Subtitle B—Host country in-kind contributions Sec. 2511. Republic of Korea funded construction projects. Sec. 2512. Republic of Poland funded construction projects. TITLE XXVI—Guard and Reserve Forces facilities Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve. Sec. 2607. Extension of authority to carry out fiscal year 2018 project at Hulman Regional Airport, Indiana. Sec. 2608. Extension of authority to carry out fiscal year 2019 project at Francis S. Gabreski Airport, New York. Sec. 2609. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2021 projects. Sec. 2610. Modification of authority to carry out fiscal year 2022 project at Nickell Memorial Armory, Kansas. Sec. 2611. Modification of authority to carry out fiscal year 2023 project at Camp Pendleton, California. Sec. 2612. Authority to conduct restoration and modernization projects at the First City Troop Readiness Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. TITLE XXVII—Base realignment and closure activities Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account. Sec. 2702. Prohibition on conducting additional base realignment and closure (BRAC) round. Sec. 2703. Closure and disposal of the Pueblo Chemical Depot, Pueblo County, Colorado. TITLE XXVIII—Military construction general provisions Subtitle A—Military Construction Program Sec. 2801. Authority for Indo-Pacific posture military construction projects. Sec. 2802. Ordering authority for maintenance, repair, and construction of facilities of Department of Defense. Sec. 2803. Application of area construction cost indices outside the United States. Sec. 2804. Authorization of cost-plus incentive-fee contracting for military construction projects to mitigate risk to the Sentinel Program schedule and cost. Sec. 2805. Extensions to the Military Lands Withdrawal Act relating to Barry M. Goldwater range. Sec. 2806. Authority to lease land parcel for hospital and medical campus, Barrigada Transmitter Site, Guam. Sec. 2807. Revision to access and management of Air Force memorial. Sec. 2808. Development and operation of the Marine Corps Heritage Center and the National Museum of the Marine Corps. Sec. 2809. Authority for acquisition of real property interest in park land owned by the Commonwealth of Virginia. Sec. 2810. Movement or consolidation of Joint Spectrum Center to Fort Meade, Maryland, or another appropriate location. Sec. 2811. Temporary expansion of authority for use of one-step turn-key selection procedures for repair projects. Sec. 2812. Modification of temporary increase of amounts in connection with authority to carry out unspecified minor military construction. Sec. 2813. Pilot program on replacement of substandard enlisted barracks. Sec. 2814. Expansion of Defense Community Infrastructure Pilot Program to include installations of the Coast Guard. Sec. 2815. Modification of pilot program on increased use of sustainable building materials in military construction. Subtitle B—Military Housing PART I—Military Unaccompanied Housing Sec. 2821. Uniform condition index for military unaccompanied housing. Sec. 2822. Certification of habitability of military unaccompanied housing. Sec. 2823. Maintenance work order management process for military unaccompanied housing. Sec. 2824. Expansion of uniform code of basic standards for military housing to include military unaccompanied housing. Sec. 2825. Oversight of military unaccompanied housing. Sec. 2826. Elimination of flexibilities for adequacy or construction standards for military unaccompanied housing. Sec. 2827. Design standards for military unaccompanied housing. Sec. 2828. Termination of habitability standard waivers and assessment and plan with respect to military unaccompanied housing. Sec. 2829. Requirement for security cameras in common areas and entry points of military unaccompanied housing. Sec. 2830. Annual report on military unaccompanied housing. PART II—Privatized Military Housing Sec. 2841. Improvements to privatized military housing. Sec. 2842. Implementation of Comptroller General Recommendations relating to strengthening oversight of privatized military housing. Sec. 2843. Treatment of nondisclosure agreements with respect to privatized military housing. PART III—Other Housing Matters Sec. 2851. Department of Defense Military Housing Readiness Council. Sec. 2852. Inclusion in annual status of forces survey of questions regarding living conditions of members of the Armed Forces. Subtitle C—Land Conveyances Sec. 2861. Land conveyance, BG J Sumner Jones Army Reserve Center, Wheeling, West Virginia. Sec. 2862. Land conveyance, Wetzel County Memorial Army Reserve Center, New Martinsville, West Virginia. Subtitle D—Other Matters Sec. 2871. Authority to conduct energy resilience and conservation projects at installations where non-Department of Defense funded energy projects have occurred. Sec. 2872. Limitation on authority to modify or restrict public access to Greenbury Point Conservation Area at Naval Support Activity Annapolis, Maryland. Sec. 2873. Authorization for the Secretary of the Navy to resolve the electrical utility operations at Former Naval Air Station Barbers Point (currently known as Kalaeloa Sec. 2874. Clarification of other transaction authority for installation or facility prototyping. Sec. 2875. Requirement that Department of Defense include military installation resilience in real property management and installation master planning of Department. Sec. 2876. Increase of limitation on fee for architectural and engineering services procured by military departments. Sec. 2877. Requirement that all material types be considered for design-bid-build military construction projects. Sec. 2878. Continuing education curriculum for members of the military construction planning and design workforce and acquisition workforce of the Department of Defense. Sec. 2879. Guidance on Department of Defense-wide standards for access to installations of the Department. Sec. 2880. Deployment of existing construction materials. Sec. 2881. Technical corrections. DIVISION C—Department of Energy national security authorizations and other authorizations TITLE XXXI—Department of Energy national security programs Subtitle A—National security programs and authorizations Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration. Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup. Sec. 3103. Other defense activities. Sec. 3104. Nuclear energy. Subtitle B— Program authorizations, restrictions, and limitations Sec. 3111. Limitation on use of funds for naval nuclear fuel systems based on low-enriched uranium. Sec. 3112. Prohibition on ARIES expansion before realization of 30 pit per year base capability. Sec. 3113. Plutonium Modernization Program management. Sec. 3114. Pantex explosives manufacturing capability. Sec. 3115. Limitation on establishing an enduring bioassurance program within the National Nuclear Security Administration. Sec. 3116. Extension of authority on acceptance of contributions for acceleration or removal or security of fissile materials, radiological materials, and related equipment at vulnerable sites worldwide. Sec. 3117. Modification of reporting requirements for program on vulnerable sites. Sec. 3118. Implementation of enhanced mission delivery initiative. Sec. 3119. Limitation on use of funds until provision of spend plan for W80-4 ALT weapon development. Sec. 3120. Analyses of nuclear programs of foreign countries. Sec. 3121. Enhancing National Nuclear Security Administration supply chain reliability. Sec. 3122. Transfer of cybersecurity responsibilities to Administrator for Nuclear Security. Sec. 3123. Redesignating duties related to departmental radiological and nuclear incident responses. Sec. 3124. Modification of authority to establish certain contracting, program management, scientific, engineering, and technical positions. Sec. 3125. Technical amendments to the Atomic Energy Defense Act. Sec. 3126. Amendment to period for briefing requirements. Sec. 3127. Repeal of reporting requirements for Uranium Capabilities Replacement Project. Subtitle C—Budget and financial management matters Sec. 3131. Updated financial integration policy. Subtitle D—Other matters Sec. 3141. Integration of technical expertise of Department of Energy into policymaking. TITLE XXXII—Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Sec. 3201. Authorization. TITLE XXXV—Maritime Administration Sec. 3501. Maritime Administration. DIVISION D—Funding Tables Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents (a) Divisions This Act is organized into four divisions as follows: (1) Division A—Department of Defense Authorizations. (2) Division B—Military Construction Authorizations. (3) Division C—Department of Energy National Security Authorizations and Other Authorizations. (4) Division D—Funding Tables. (b) Table of contents The table of contents for this Act is as follows: 3. Congressional defense committees In this Act, the term congressional defense committees 4. Budgetary effects of this Act The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purposes of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation A Department of Defense authorizations I Procurement A Authorization of appropriations 101. Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2024 for procurement for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force and the Space Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4101. B Army programs 111. Report on Army requirements and acquisition strategy for night vision devices (a) Report required Not later than February 29, 2024, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on night vision devices. (b) Elements The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following elements: (1) An identification of the specific capabilities the Army is seeking to achieve in night vision. (2) An identification of the capabilities in night vision required by unit, including the number and type of units for each capability. (3) An identification of the total requirement for night vision devices in the Army, disaggregated by number and type of unit. (4) A description of the acquisition strategy of the Army for achieving the capabilities described in paragraph (1), including a description of each of the following: (A) The acquisition objective for each type of night vision device. (B) The programmed purchase quantities for night vision devices required each year. (C) The contract type of each procurement of night vision devices. (D) The expected date for achieving the capabilities. (E) The industrial base constraints on each type of night vision device. (F) The modernization plan for each type of night vision device. 112. Army plan for ensuring sources of cannon tubes (a) Updated assessment The Secretary of the Army shall update the assessment of the Secretary on the sufficiency of the development, production, procurement, and modernization of the defense industrial base for cannon and large caliber weapons tubes. (b) Submittal to Congress Not later than February 29, 2024, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives an update to the report submitted to Congress in March 2022 entitled Army Plan for Ensuring Sources of Cannon Tubes 113. Strategy for Army tactical wheeled vehicle program (a) Strategy required In the budget justification materials submitted in support of the budget of the Department of Defense (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code) for fiscal year 2025 and every five years thereafter, the Secretary of the Army shall include a report on the strategy of the Army for tactical wheeled vehicles. (b) Requirements for strategy Each strategy required by subsection (a) shall— (1) align with the applicable national defense strategy under section 113(g) of title 10, United States Code, and applicable policies; (2) be designed so that the force of tactical wheeled vehicles provided under the strategy supports the national security strategy of the United States as set forth in the most recent national security strategy report of the President under section 108 of the National Security Act of 1947 ( 50 U.S.C. 3043 (3) define capabilities and capacity requirements across the entire fleet of tactical wheeled vehicles, including— (A) light, medium, and heavy tactical wheeled vehicles; and (B) associated trailer and support equipment. (c) Strategy elements Each strategy required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A detailed program for the construction of light, medium, and heavy tactical wheeled vehicles for the Army over the next five fiscal years. (2) A description of the necessary force structure and capabilities of tactical wheeled vehicles to meet the requirements of the national security strategy described in subsection (b)(2). (3) The estimated levels of annual funding, by vehicle class, in both graphical and tabular form, necessary to carry out the program described in paragraph (1), together with a discussion of the procurement strategies on which such estimated levels of annual funding are based. (4) The estimated total cost of construction for each vehicle class used to determine the estimated levels of annual funding described in paragraph (3). (d) Considerations In developing each strategy required by subsection (a), the Secretary of the Army shall consider the following objectives and factors: (1) Objectives relating to protection, fleet operations, mission command, mobility, and the industrial base. (2) Technological advances that will increase efficiency of and reduce demand for tactical wheeled vehicles. (3) Technological advances that allow for the operation of tactical wheeled vehicles in a variety of climate and geographic conditions. (4) Existing commercial technologies such as vehicle electrification, autonomous capabilities, and predictive maintenance, among others. (5) The capabilities of autonomous equivalents to tactical wheeled vehicles. (e) Briefing requirements Not later than 15 days after each budget submission described in subsection (a), in conjunction with the submission of each strategy required by such subsection, the Secretary of the Army shall provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees that addresses the investment needed for each platform of tactical wheeled vehicle across the future-years defense program. 114. Extension and modification of annual updates to master plans and investment strategies for Army ammunition plants Section 2834(d) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (division B of Public Law 117–81 (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking March 31, 2026 March 31, 2030 (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (5) A description of any changes made to the master plan based upon current global events, including pandemics and armed conflicts. . 115. Report on acquisition strategies of the logistics augmentation program of the Army (a) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army, in conjunction with the Office of the Secretary of Defense and in coordination with the geographic combatant commanders, shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report reviewing the proposed recompete of the operational task orders of the geographic combatant commands under the contract for the logistics augmentation program of the Army that will expire in 2028 (commonly referred to as LOGCAP V (b) Elements The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A business case analysis of the cost and operational benefit of recompeting the task orders described in subsection (a). (2) Input from stakeholders, including Army Sustainment Command, the geographic combatant commanders, and Army service component commanders, on the desirability and operational impacts of the proposed recompete described in subsection (a). (3) Detailed cost estimates and timelines, including projected transition costs and timelines for the task orders described in subsection (a). (4) An assessment of the potential impacts related to quality and timing of transitioning to the new logistics augmentation program (commonly referred to as LOGCAP VI (5) An analysis of recompeting the task orders described in subsection (a) compared to transitioning to LOGCAP VI. (6) An overview of potential innovations and efficiencies derived from a competition for LOGCAP VI. (7) An explanation of the benefit of recompeting the task orders described in subsection (a) compared to an open competition for LOGCAP VI. (8) A breakdown of additional authorities needed to move directly to LOGCAP VI. C Navy programs 121. Reduction in the minimum number of Navy carrier air wings and carrier air wing headquarters required to be maintained Section 8062(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking until the earlier of until the date on which additional operationally deployable aircraft carriers can fully support a 10th carrier air wing; (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the earlier of and (B) of the date referred to in 122. Extension of prohibition on availability of funds for Navy port waterborne security barriers Section 130(a) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 Public Law 117–263 through 2023 through 2024 123. Multiyear procurement authority for Virginia class submarine program (a) Authority for multiyear procurement Subject to section 3501 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may enter into one or more multiyear contracts for the procurement of 10 Virginia class submarines. (b) Authority for advance procurement and economic order quantity The Secretary of the Navy may enter into one or more contracts, beginning in fiscal year 2024, for advance procurement associated with the Virginia class submarines for which authorization to enter into a multiyear procurement contract is provided under subsection (a) and for equipment or subsystems associated with the Virginia class submarine program, including procurement of— (1) long lead time material; or (2) material or equipment in economic order quantities when cost savings are achievable. (c) Condition for out-year contract payments A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2025 is subject to the availability of appropriations or funds for that purpose for such later fiscal year. (d) Limitation on termination liability A contract for the construction of Virginia class submarines entered into under subsection (a) shall include a clause that limits the liability of the United States to the contractor for any termination of the contract. The maximum liability of the United States under the clause shall be the amount appropriated for the submarines covered by the contract regardless of the amount obligated under the contract. D Air Force programs 131. Limitations and minimum inventory requirement relating to RQ–4 aircraft Section 9062 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (l) (1) During the period beginning on the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (A) retire an RQ–4 aircraft; (B) reduce funding for unit personnel or weapon system sustainment activities for RQ–4 aircraft in a manner that presumes future congressional authority to divest such aircraft; (C) keep an RQ–4 aircraft in a status considered excess to the requirements of the possessing command and awaiting disposition instructions (commonly referred to as XJ (D) decrease the total aircraft inventory of RQ–4 aircraft below 10 aircraft. (2) The prohibition under paragraph (1) shall not apply to individual RQ–4 aircraft that the Secretary of the Air Force determines, on a case-by-case basis, to be no longer mission capable and uneconomical to repair because of aircraft accidents, mishaps, or excessive material degradation and non-airworthiness status of certain aircraft. . 132. Limitation on divestiture of T–1A training aircraft No divestiture of any T–1A training aircraft may occur until the Chief of Staff of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees a certification of— (1) the fleet-wide implementation of the Undergraduate Pilot Training 2.5 curriculum and the effect of such implementation on the undergraduate pilot training pipeline; and (2) how the divestiture would affect existing programs of the Air Force that accelerate pilot training. 133. Modification to minimum inventory requirement for A–10 aircraft (a) Fiscal year 2017 Section 134(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 Public Law 117–263 153 A–10 aircraft 135 A–10 aircraft (b) Fiscal year 2016 Section 142(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( Public Law 114–92 Public Law 117–263 153 A–10 aircraft 135 A–10 aircraft 134. Modification to minimum requirement for total primary mission aircraft inventory of Air Force fighter aircraft Section 9062(i)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 1,145 fighter aircraft 1,112 fighter aircraft 135. Modification of limitation on divestment of F–15 aircraft Section 150 of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 (1) in subsection (b)(1)— (A) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by striking ; and (B) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and (C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (E) for each covered F–15 aircraft that the Secretary plans to divest, a description of— (i) the upgrades and modifications done to the aircraft, including the date of each modification and the value amount of each modification in current year dollars; and (ii) the estimated remaining service life of— (I) the aircraft; and (II) the onboard systems of the aircraft. ; and (2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and (3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c): (c) Updates Not later than October 1 of each year through October 1, 2028, the Secretary of the Air Force shall— (1) update the report required under subsection (b); and (2) submit such update to the congressional defense committees. . 136. Report on Air Force executive aircraft (a) In general Not later than January 1, 2025, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following: (1) An overview of the total missions flown by executive aircraft of the Air Force during the five fiscal years preceding the fiscal year in which the report is submitted, disaggregated by fiscal year, including the mission types and Government agencies supported. (2) An identification of each mission flown by executive aircraft of the Air Force during the five fiscal years preceding the fiscal year in which the report is submitted, disaggregated by fiscal year, including the mission type, overall cost, average flight hour cost, and Government agency supported, disaggregated by wing and by type of aircraft. (3) The projected mission capacity for executive aircraft of the Air Force for the five fiscal years following the fiscal year in which the report is submitted, disaggregated by fiscal year, factoring in any planned changes to aircraft inventory. (4) A description of any anomalous conditions that may have impacted the availability, with respect to executive aircraft of the Air Force, of a specific aircraft type or wing during the five fiscal years preceding the fiscal year in which the report is submitted, such as unavailability of a specific aircraft type due to block upgrades or fleetwide maintenance issues. (5) A description of the impact of the capacity of executive aircraft of the Air Force on the overall capacity of the Department of Defense to meet demand for executive aircraft. (6) The total outlays of the Department of the Air Force for missions flown by executive aircraft of the Air Force, after factoring in reimbursements received from Government agencies supported, during the five fiscal years preceding the fiscal year in which the report is submitted, disaggregated by fiscal year and by account. (7) The projected budgets for the executive aircraft of the Air Force through the future years defense program. (8) A narrative description of how the Air Force plans and budgets for missions flown by executive aircraft. (9) Any other information the Secretary considers to be important. (b) Form The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex for the purposes of describing classified missions supported by the executive aircraft of the Air Force. E Defense-wide, joint, and multiservice matters 141. Pilot program to accelerate the procurement and fielding of innovative technologies Section 834(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 10 U.S.C. 4061 (3) The Secretary of Defense may waive the priority established pursuant to paragraph (1) for up to two solicitations for proposals per fiscal year. . 142. Requirement to develop and implement policies to establish the datalink strategy of the Department of Defense (a) Policies required (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement policies to establish the unified datalink strategy of the Department of Defense (in this section referred to as the strategy (2) Elements The policies required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) The designation of an organization that will act as the lead coordinator of datalink activities across the entire Department of Defense. (B) Prioritization and coordination across services of the strategy within the requirements generation process of the Department. (C) The use of a common standardized datalink network or transport protocol that ensures interoperability between independently developed datalinks, regardless of physical medium used, and ensures mesh routing. The Secretary of Defense shall consider the use of a subset of Internet Protocol. (D) A programmatic decoupling of the physical method used to transmit data, the network or transport protocols used in the transmission and reception of data, and the applications used to process and use data. (E) The coordination of weapon systems executing the same mission types across services of the strategy, including through the use of a common set of datalink waveforms. The Secretary shall evaluate the use of redundant datalinks for line-of-sight and beyond-line-of-sight information exchange for each weapon systems platform. (F) Coordination between the Department and the intelligence community (as defined in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 ( 50 U.S.C. 3003 (G) Methods to support the rapid integration of common datalinks across the force. (H) Support for modularity of specific datalink waveforms to enable rapid integration of future datalinks, including the use of software defined radios compliant with modular open system architecture and sensor open system architecture. (b) Information to Congress Not later than June 1, 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees the following: (1) A briefing on the proposed policies required by subsection (a)(1), with timelines for implementation. (2) An estimated timeline of implementations of datalinks. (3) A list of any additional resources and authorities required to execute the strategy. (4) A determination of whether a common set of datalinks can and should be implemented across all major weapon systems within the Department of Defense. 143. Report on contract for cybersecurity capabilities and briefing (a) Report (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the decision to exercise options on an existing contract to use cybersecurity capabilities to protect assets and networks across the Department of Defense. (2) Elements The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A description of the potential effects on innovation and competition among cybersecurity vendors of the decision to exercise the cybersecurity options on the contract described in paragraph (1). (B) A description of the risks and benefits associated with an integrated enterprise-wide cybersecurity solution from a single vendor. (C) A description of future plans of the Department of Defense to recompete the acquisition of integrated and interoperable cybersecurity tools and applications that would allow multiple vendors to compete separately and as teams. (D) A copy of the analysis conducted by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation of the Department of the costs and effectiveness of the cybersecurity capabilities covered by the contract described in paragraph (1). (E) A copy of the analysis conducted by the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation of the Department of the effectiveness of the cybersecurity capabilities covered by the contract described in paragraph (1) compared to other commercially available products and vendors. (b) Briefing Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall brief the congressional defense committees on the plans of the Department to ensure competition and interoperability in the security and identity and access management product market segments. II Research, development, test, and evaluation A Authorization of appropriations 201. Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2024 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in the funding table in section 4201. B Program requirements, restrictions, and limitations 211. Updated guidance on planning for exportability features for future programs (a) Program guidance on planning for exportability features The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall ensure that program guidance is updated to integrate planning for exportability features called for by section 4067 of title 10, United States Code, for the following activities: (1) Major defense acquisition programs (MDAPs) (as defined in section 4201 of title 10, United States Code), which shall include in the initial cost estimates for the programs a requirement to capture potential exportability needs. (2) Middle tier acquisition (MTA) programs described in section 804(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( Public Law 114–92 10 U.S.C. 3201 (b) Revision of guidance for program protection plans The Under Secretary shall revise guidance for program protection plans to integrate a requirement to determine exportability for the programs covered by such plans. 212. Support to the Defence Innovation Accelerator for the North Atlantic (a) Authority To the extent and in such amounts as provided in appropriations Acts for the purposes set forth in this section, the Secretary of Defense may, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, provide funds of not more than $15,000,000 per year to sustain the participation of the United States in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Defence Innovation Accelerator for the North Atlantic (DIANA) Initiative (in this section the Initiative (b) Notification (1) In general Not later than 15 days after the date on which the Secretary makes a decision to provide funds pursuant to subsection (a), the Under Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a written notification of such decision. (2) Contents Notification submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A detailed breakout of the funding provided. (B) The intended purposes of such funds. (C) The timeframe covered by such funds. (c) Strategy (1) In general Not later than July 1, 2024, the Under Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a strategy for participation by the United States in the Initiative. (2) Contents The strategy submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A description for how the Initiative fits into the innovation ecosystem for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, as well as how it is synchronized with and will interact with other science, technology, and innovation activities within the Department of Defense. (B) Anticipated funding profile across the future years defense program (FYDP). (C) Identification of key technology focus areas to be addressed each year across the future years defense program. (D) Anticipated areas for expansion for key nodes or locations for the Initiative, including how the Initiative will contribute to fostering the spread of innovation throughout the United States. (d) Annual report Not later than February 1, 2024, and February 1 of each year thereafter through 2026, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees an annual report for Department supported activities of the Initiative, including the breakdown of funding provided for the previous fiscal year, and key milestones or achievements during that timeframe. (e) Sunset The authority provided by subsection (a) shall terminate on September 30, 2026. 213. Modification to personnel management authority to attract experts in science and engineering Section 4092(b) of title 10, United States code is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking of which not more than 5 such positions may be positions of administration or management of the Agency (2) in paragraph (4), by inserting , including, upon separation, pay the travel, transportation, and relocation expenses to return to the location of origin, at the time of the initial appointment, within the United States 214. Administration of the Advanced Sensors Application Program Section 218 of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking The Commander of Naval Air Systems Command and the Director of Air Warfare shall jointly serve The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, acting through the Director of the Air Force Office of Concepts, Development, and Management Office, shall serve (B) in paragraph (2), by striking The resource sponsors of the Program shall be responsible The resource sponsor, in consultation with the Commander of Naval Air Systems Command, shall be responsible (2) in subsection (b), by striking Only the Secretary of the Navy, the Under Secretary of the Navy, and the Commander of Naval Air Systems Command may Only the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security and the Director of the Air Force Concepts, Development, and Management Office, in consultation with the Commander of Naval Air Systems Command, may (3) in subsection (d)(3), by striking exercised by the Commander of Naval Air Systems Command, the Secretary of the Navy, or the Under Secretary of the Navy exercised by the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security and the Director of the Air Force Concepts, Development, and Management Office 215. Delegation of responsibility for certain research programs Section 980(b) of title 10, United Stated Code, is amended— (1) by inserting (1) The Secretary (2) by adding to the end the following new paragraph: (2) The Secretary may delegate the authority provided by paragraph (1) to the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. . 216. Program of standards and requirements for microelectronics (a) Program required The Secretary of Defense shall establish, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, a program within the National Security Agency to develop and continuously update, as the Secretary determines necessary, standards, commercial best practices, and requirements for the design, manufacture, packaging, test, and distribution of microelectronics acquired by the Department of Defense to provide acceptable levels of confidentiality, integrity, and availability for Department commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) microelectronics, field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and custom integrated circuits (CICs). (b) Advice and assessment The Secretary shall ensure that the program established pursuant to subsection (a) is advised and assessed by the Government-Industry-Academia Working Group on Microelectronics established under section 220 of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 (c) Requirements The program established by subsection (a) shall develop— (1) evidence-based assurance processes and techniques that sustain, build on, automate, and scale up the results and accomplishments of the Rapid Assured Microelectronics Prototypes (RAMP), RAMP-Commercial (RAMP-C), and State-of-the-Art Heterogeneous Integrated Packaging (SHIP) programs to enhance the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of microelectronics while minimizing costs and impacts to commercial manufacturing practices; (2) validation methods for such processes and techniques, in coordination with the developmental and operational test and evaluation community, as the Secretary determines necessary; (3) threat models that comprehensively characterize the threat to microelectronics confidentiality, integrity, and availability across the entire supply chain, and the design, production, packaging, and deployment cycle to support risk management and risk mitigation, based on the principle of reducing risk to as low a level as reasonably practicable, including— (A) comparative risk assessments; and (B) balanced and practical investments in assurance based on risks and returns; (4) levels of assurance and associated requirements for the production and acquisition of commercial-off-the-shelf integrated circuits, integrated circuits subject to International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) under subchapter M of chapter I of title 22, Code of Federal Regulations, or successor regulations, and classified integrated circuits using commercial foundry manufacturing process flows; (5) guides for Federal Government program evaluators, program offices, and industry to meet microelectronics assurance requirements; and (6) guidance for the creation of a government organizational structure and plan to support the acquisition of fit-for-purpose microelectronics, including the role of the Defense Microelectronics Activity, the Crane Division of the Naval Surface Warfare Center, and the Joint Federated Assurance Center. (d) Microelectronics assurance standard The program established pursuant to subsection (a) shall establish a Department microelectronics assurance standard that includes an overarching assurance framework as well as the guides developed under subsection (c)(5), for commercial-off-the-shelf integrated circuits, integrated circuits subject to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations under subchapter M of chapter I of title 22, Code of Federal Regulations, or successor regulations, and classified microelectronics developed under subsection (c)(4). (e) Microelectronics Assurance Executive Agent The Secretary shall designate one individual from a military department as the Microelectronics Assurance Executive Agent to assist Federal Government program offices in acquiring fit-for-purpose microelectronics. (f) Management of RAMP and SHIP programs Effective on the date of the establishment of the program required by subsection (a), such program shall assume management of the Rapid Assured Microelectronics Prototypes, Rapid Assured Microelectronics Prototypes-Commercial (RAMP-C), and State-of-the-Art Heterogeneous Integrated Packaging programs that were in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act and executed by the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. (g) Oversight The Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering shall provide oversight of the planning and execution of the program required by subsection (a). (h) Requirements for contracting for application-specific integrated circuits The Secretary shall ensure that, for contracts for application-specific integrated circuits designed by defense industrial base contractors— (1) the use of evidence-based assurance processes and techniques are included in the contract data requirements list; (2) commercial best industry practices for confidentiality, integrity, and availability are used; (3) a library of certified third-party intellectual property is established for reuse, including reuse of transistor layouts, cells, and macrocells; (4) legal mechanisms are in place for data collection and sharing; and (5) automation technology is adopted to achieve efficiency. 217. Clarifying role of partnership intermediaries to promote defense research and education Section 4124(f)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking that assists (A) assists ; (2) in subparagraph (A), as designated by paragraph (1), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs: (B) facilitates technology transfer from industry or academic institutions to the Center; or (C) assists and facilitates workforce development in critical technology areas and technology transition to fulfill unmet needs of a Center. . 218. Competition for technology that detects and watermarks the use of generative artificial intelligence (a) Establishment (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall establish and carry out a prize competition under section 4025 of title 10, United States Code, to evaluate technology, including applications, tools, and models, for the detection and watermarking of generative artificial intelligence (AI)— (A) to facilitate the research, development, testing, evaluation, and competition of secure generative artificial intelligence detection and watermark technologies that can support each Secretary of a military department and the commanders of combatant commands to support warfighting requirements; and (B) to transition such technologies, including technologies developed from pilot programs, prototype projects, or other research and development programs, from the prototyping phase to production. (2) Participation The participants in the competition carried out pursuant to paragraph (1) may include Federally-funded research and development centers (FFRDCs), the private sector, the defense industrial base, academia, government agencies, and such other participants as the Secretary considers appropriate. (3) Commencement The competition will begin within 270 days of passage of this Act. (4) Designation The competition established and carried out pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be known as the Generative AI Detection and Watermark Competition (b) Administration The Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering shall administer the competition required by subsection (a). (c) Framework Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide the congressional defense committees a briefing on the framework the Secretary will use to carry out the competition required by subsection (a). (d) Annual reports Not later than October 1 of each year until the termination of the competition established and carried out under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the competition. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term detection (2) The term watermarking (f) Termination The competition established and carried out pursuant to subsection (a) shall terminate on December 31, 2025. C Plans, reports, and other matters 221. Department of Defense prize competitions for business systems modernization (a) In general Not later than September 30, 2028, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the military departments shall complete one or more prize competitions under section 4025 of title 10, United States Code, in order to support the business systems modernization goals of the Department of Defense. (b) Scope (1) In general Each prize competition carried out under subsection (a) shall be structured to complement, and to the degree practicable, accelerate delivery or expand functionality of business systems capabilities being pursued by the affected Secretary, either currently in operation, in development, or for broad classes of systems covered by the business enterprise architecture required by section 2222(e) of title 10, United States Code. (2) Areas for consideration In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the military departments shall each consider the following: (A) Integration of artificial intelligence or machine learning capabilities. (B) Data analytics or business intelligence, or related visualization capability. (C) Automated updating of business architectures, business systems integration, or documentation related to existing systems or manuals. (D) Improvements to interfaces or processes for interacting with other non-Department of Defense business systems. (E) Updates or replacements for legacy business systems to improve operational effectiveness and efficiency, such as the Mechanization of Contract Administration Services (MOCAS). (F) Contract writing systems or expanded capability that could be integrated into existing systems. (G) Pay and personnel systems, or expanded capability, that could be integrated into existing systems. (H) Other finance and accounting systems, or expanded capability, that could be integrated into existing systems. (I) Systems supporting industrial base and supply chain visibility, analytics, and management. 222. Update to plans and strategies for artificial intelligence (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Deputy Secretary of Defense— (1) establish and document procedures, including timelines, for the periodic review of the 2018 Department of Defense Artificial Intelligence Strategy, or any successor strategy, and associated annexes of the military departments to assess the implementation of the strategy and whether any revision is necessary; (2) issue Department of Defense-wide guidance that defines outcomes of near-term and long-term strategies and plans relating to— (A) the adoption of artificial intelligence; (B) adoption and enforcement of policies on the ethical use of artificial intelligence systems; and (C) the identification and mitigation of bias in artificial intelligence algorithms; (3) issue Department-wide guidance regarding— (A) methods to monitor accountability for artificial intelligence-related activity, including artificial intelligence performance indicators and metrics; (B) means to enforce and update ethics policy and guidelines across all adopted artificial intelligence systems; and (C) means to identify, monitor, and mitigate bias in artificial intelligence algorithms; (4) develop a strategic plan for the development, use, and cybersecurity of generative artificial intelligence, including a policy for use of, and defense against adversarial use of, generative artificial intelligence; (5) assess technical workforce needs across the future years defense plan to support the continued development of artificial intelligence capabilities, including recruitment and retention policies and programs; (6) assess the availability and adequacy of the basic artificial intelligence training and education curricula available to the broader Department civilian workforce and military personnel to promote artificial intelligence literacy to the nontechnical workforce and senior leadership with responsibilities adjacent to artificial intelligence technical development; (7) develop and issue a timeline and guidance for the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer of the Department and the Secretaries of the military departments to establish a common terminology for artificial intelligence-related activities; (8) develop and implement a plan to protect and secure the integrity, availability, and privacy of artificial intelligence systems and models, including large language models, data libraries, data repositories, and algorithms, in training, development, and production environments; (9) develop and implement a plan— (A) to identify commercially available and relevant large language models; and (B) to make those available, as appropriate, on classified networks; (10) develop a plan to defend the people, organizations, and systems of the Department against adversarial artificial intelligence, including identification of organizations within the Department that could provide red teams capabilities for operational and developmental needs; (11) develop and implement a policy for use by contracting officials to protect the intellectual property of commercial entities that provide their artificial intelligence algorithms to a Department repository established pursuant to section 232 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 10 U.S.C. 4001 (12) issue guidance and directives for how the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer of the Department will exercise authority to access, control, and maintain, on behalf of the Secretary, data collected, acquired, accessed, or utilized by Department components consistent with section 1513 of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 10 U.S.C. 4001 (13) clarify guidance on the instances for and role of human intervention and oversight in the exercise of artificial intelligence algorithms for use in the generation of offensive or lethal courses of action for tactical operations. (b) Due date for procedures, guidance, plans, assessment, and timelines (1) Due date The Secretary shall develop the procedures, guidance, plans, assessment, and timelines required under subsection (a) not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act. (2) Briefing Not later than 150 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the procedures, guidance, plans, assessment, and timelines established, issued, carried out, or developed under subsection (a). 223. Western regional range complex demonstration (a) Demonstration required The Secretary shall carry out a demonstration of a joint multi-domain nonkinetic testing and training environment across military departments by interconnecting existing ranges and training sites in the western States to improve joint multi-domain nonkinetic training and further testing, research, and development. (b) Use of existing ranges and capabilities The demonstration carried out pursuant to subsection (a) shall use existing ranges and range capability, unless capability gaps are identified in the process of planning specific demonstration activities. (c) Activities The demonstration carried out pursuant to subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) Electromagnetic spectrum operations. (2) Electromagnetic warfare. (3) Operations in the information environment. (4) Joint All Domain Command and Control (JADC2). (5) Information warfare, including the following: (A) Intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. (B) Offensive and defense cyber operations. (C) Electromagnetic warfare. (D) Space operations. (E) Psychological operations. (F) Public affairs. (G) Weather operations. (d) Timeline for completion of initial demonstration In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall seek to complete an initial demonstration, interconnecting two or more ranges or testing sites of two or more military departments in the western States, subject to availability of appropriations, not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act. (e) Briefing Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide the congressional defense committees a briefing on— (1) a phased implementation plan and design to connect ranges and testing sites in the western States, including the initial demonstration required by subsection (d); (2) how the design architecture of the plan is in alignment with recommendations of the 2020 Department of Defense Electromagnetic Spectrum Superiority Strategy; and (3) how the design architecture will support high-periodicity training, testing, research, and development. (f) Definition In this section: (1) Information environment The term information environment (2) Secretary The term Secretary (g) Termination This section shall terminate on September 30, 2028. 224. Report on feasibility and advisability of establishing a quantum computing innovation center (a) In general Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer, submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the feasibility and advisability of establishing a quantum computing innovation center within the Department of Defense— (1) to identify and pursue the development of quantum computing applications to enhance military operations; (2) to harness the talent and skills of physicists and scientists within the Department to develop quantum computing applications; and (3) to coordinate and synchronize quantum computing research across the Department. (b) Elements The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An assessment of the ongoing activities of the Department that are part of the National Quantum Initiative. (2) An evaluation of the plans of the Department to develop quantum computing, sensing, and networking applications. (3) The level of funding and resources invested by the Department to enable quantum military applications. (4) Any established metrics or performance indicators to track the progress of quantum technology developments. (5) The extent to which the Department is partnering with commercial entities engaging in quantum research and development. (6) An evaluation of any plans establishing how commercial advances in quantum technology can be leveraged for military operations. (7) An assessment of the maturity of United States competitor efforts to develop quantum applications for adversarial use. (8) An assessment of any processes to harmonize or coordinate activities across the Department to develop quantum computing applications. (9) An evaluation of any Department-issued policy guidance regarding quantum computing applications. (10) An evaluation of any Department plans to defend against adversarial use of quantum computing applications. 225. Briefing on the impediments to the transition of the Semantic Forensics program to operational use (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering shall, in consultation with the Office of General Counsel of the Department of Defense and the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, provide to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a briefing on the impediments to the transition of the Semantic Forensics program to operational use. (b) Elements The briefing provided pursuant to subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) Identification of policy and legal challenges associated with the transition described in subsection (a) and implementation of the Semantic Forensics program, including with respect to the use and operational testing of publicly available information. (2) Identification of other Federal agencies with legal authorities that may be able to resolve the challenges identified pursuant to paragraph (1). (3) Recommendations for legislative or administrative action to mitigate the challenges identified pursuant to paragraph (1). 226. Annual report on Department of Defense hypersonic capability funding and investment (a) In general Not later than March 1 of fiscal year 2024 and March 1 of each of fiscal year thereafter through 2030, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an annual report on funding and investments of the Department of Defense relating to hypersonic capabilities, including with respect to procurement, research, development, operations, and maintenance of offensive and defensive hypersonic weapons. (b) Requirements Each report submitted pursuant to subsection (a) shall— (1) include cost data on the vehicles, testing, hypersonic sensors, command and control architectures, infrastructure, testing infrastructure, software, workforce, training, ranges, integration costs, and such other items as the Secretary considers appropriate; (2) disaggregate information reported by offensive and defensive hypersonic capabilities; (3) for research relating to hypersonic capabilities, include the program element and the name of the entity that is conducting the research, a description of the purpose of the research, and any Uniform Resource Locators to weapon programs associated with the research; and (4) to the degree applicable, include all associated hypersonic program elements and line items. (c) Form Each report submitted pursuant to subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 227. Limitation on availability of funds for travel for office of Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness pending a plan for modernizing Defense Travel System (a) Limitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2024 for travel for the office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, not more than 85 percent may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of Defense submits to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives supporting justification material underpinning the decision to cease current modernization efforts for the Defense Travel System (DTS), and a plan going forward for modernizing or replacing such system (b) Contents The justification material and plan described in subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) The documentation from the Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) justifying cancellation of the current modernization contract, including— (A) specific metrics used to make that determination; (B) a timeline for decisions leading to the final cancellation; (C) notification from the military departments when they were unable to make the desired usage rates using the current modernization prototype; (D) identification of system requirements for audit readiness, as well as interface needs for other enterprise resource planning systems, in the current modernization contract; and (E) alternatives considered prior to cancellation. (2) An assessment by the Cost Assessment of Program Evaluation office comparing— (A) costs of continuing with the current modernization prototype across the future years defense plan (FYDP); and (B) costs of sustainment of the Defense Travel System across the future years defense plan, factoring potential costs of restarting modernization efforts. (3) A description from the Milestone Decision Authority on what the current plan is for modernizing the Defense Travel System, including timelines and potential costs. 228. Annual report on unfunded priorities for research, development, test, and evaluation activities (a) In general Chapter 9 section 222d 222e. Unfunded priorities for research, development, test, and evaluation activities (a) Annual report Not later than 10 days after the date on which the budget of the President for a fiscal year is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the unfunded priorities of the Department of Defense-wide research, development, test, and evaluation activities. (b) Contents (1) In general Except as provided in subsection (c), each report submitted under subsection (a) shall specify, for each unfunded priority covered by such report, the following: (A) A summary description of such priority, including the objectives to be achieved if such priority is funded (whether in whole or in part). (B) The additional amount of funds recommended in connection with the objectives under subparagraph (A). (C) Account information with respect to such priority, including the following (as applicable): (i) Line Item Number (LIN) for applicable procurement accounts. (ii) Program Element (PE) number for applicable research, development, test, and evaluation accounts. (2) Prioritization of priorities The report under subsection (a) shall present the unfunded priorities covered by such report in order of urgency of priority. (c) Exclusion of priorities covered in other reports The report submitted under subsection (a) shall not include unfunded priorities or requirements covered in reports submitted under— (1) section 222a or 222b; or (2) section 2806 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 10 U.S.C. 222a (d) Form Each report submitted pursuant to subsection (a) shall be submitted in classified format, but the Secretary may also submit an unclassified version as the Secretary considers appropriate. (e) Unfunded priority defined In this section, the term unfunded priority (1) is not funded in the budget of the President for the fiscal year as submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31; and (2) would have been recommended for funding through that budget if— (A) additional resources had been available for the budget to fund the program, activity, or mission requirement; or (B) the program, activity, or mission requirement has emerged since the budget was formulated. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 9 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 222d the following new item: 222e. Annual report on unfunded priorities for research, development, test, and evaluation activities. . III Operation and Maintenance A Authorization of Appropriations 301. Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2024 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4301. B Energy and Environment 311. Requirement for approval by Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment of any waiver for a system that does not meet fuel efficiency key performance parameter Section 332(b) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( Public Law 110–417 10 U.S.C. 2911 (1) by striking The Secretary of Defense (1) In general The Secretary of Defense ; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) Waiver of fuel efficiency key performance parameter (A) In general The fuel efficiency key performance parameter implemented under paragraph (1) may be waived for a system only if such waiver is approved by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. (B) Nondelegation The waiver authority under subparagraph (A) may not be delegated. . 312. Improvement and codification of Sentinel Landscapes Partnership program authority (a) Codification of existing statute Section 317 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 10 U.S.C. 2684a (1) by transferring such section to appear after section 2692 of title 10, United States Code; (2) by redesignating such section as section 2693; and (3) by amending the section heading to read as follows: 2693. Sentinel Landscapes Partnership . (b) Improvements to Sentinel Landscapes Partnership program Section 2693 of title 10, United States Code, as transferred and redesignated by subsection (a), is further amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking and the Secretary of the Interior , the Secretary of the Interior, and the heads of other Federal departments and agencies that elect to become full partners (2) in subsection (b), by striking and the Secretary of the Interior, may, as the Secretaries the Secretary of the Interior, and the heads of other Federal departments and agencies that elect to become full partners may, as they (3) by amending subsection (c) to read as follows: (c) Coordination of activities The Secretaries and the heads of Federal departments and agencies, in carrying out this section, may coordinate actions between their departments and agencies and with other Federal, State, interstate, and local agencies, Indian Tribes, and private entities to more efficiently work together for the mutual benefit of conservation, resilience, working lands, and national defense, and to encourage owners and managers of land to engage in voluntary land management, resilience, and conservation activities that contribute to the sustainment of military installations, State-owned National Guard installations, and associated airspace. ; (4) in subsection (d)— (A) by striking the first sentence and inserting The Secretaries and the heads of Federal departments and agencies, in carrying out this section, may give to any eligible owner or manager of land within a designated sentinel landscape priority consideration for participation in any easement, grant, or assistance programs administered by that Secretary or head. (B) in the second sentence, by striking eligible landowner or agricultural producer eligible owner or manager of land (5) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); (6) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f): (f) Rule of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to require an owner or manager of land, including a private landowner or agricultural producer, to participate in any land management, resilience, or conservation activity under this section. ; (7) in subsection (g), as redesigned by paragraph (5)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking section 670(1) of title 16, United States Code section 100(1) of the Sikes Act ( 16 U.S.C. 670(1) (B) in paragraph (2), by striking section 670(3) of title 16, United States Code section 100(3) of the Sikes Act ( 16 U.S.C. 670(3) (C) in paragraph (3), by amending subparagraph (B) to read as follows: (B) the publicly and privately owned lands that serve to protect and support the rural economy, the natural environment, outdoor recreation, and the national defense missions of a military installation or State-owned National Guard installation. . (c) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 159 section 2692 2693. Sentinel Landscapes Partnership. . 313. Modification of definition of sustainable aviation fuel for purpose of pilot program on use of such fuel Section 324(g) of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 (1) by striking paragraph (2); (2) by redesignating paragraph (1) as paragraph (2); (3) by inserting before paragraph (2), as redesignated by paragraph (2) of this section, the following new paragraph: (1) The term applicable material (A) monoglycerides, diglycerides, and triglycerides; (B) free fatty acids; or (C) fatty acid esters. ; and (4) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (3) The term biomass section 45K(c)(3) (4) The term lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions reduction percentage (A) the most recent Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation that has been adopted, as of the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (B) the most recent determinations, as of the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (5) The term sustainable aviation fuel (A) meets the requirements of— (i) ASTM International Standard D7566; or (ii) the Fischer Tropsch provisions of ASTM International Standard D1655, Annex A1; (B) is not derived from coprocessing an applicable material (or materials derived from an applicable material) with a feedstock that is not biomass; (C) is not derived from palm fatty acid distillates or petroleum; and (D) has been certified pursuant to a scheme or model under paragraph (4) as having a lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions reduction percentage of not less than 50 percent. . 314. Payment to Environmental Protection Agency of stipulated penalties in connection with Naval Air Station Moffett Field, California (a) Authority to transfer funds (1) Transfer amount (A) In general The Secretary of the Navy may transfer an amount not to exceed $438,250 to the Hazardous Substance Superfund established under section 9507 (B) Inapplicability of limitation Any transfer under subparagraph (A) shall be made without regard to section 2215 of title 10, United States Code. (2) Source of funds Any transfer under paragraph (1)(A) shall be made using funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2024 for the Department of Defense Base Closure Account established under section 2906(a) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 ( Public Law 101–510 10 U.S.C. 2687 (b) Purpose of transfer Any transfer under subsection (a)(1)(A) shall be for the purpose of satisfying a stipulated penalty assessed by the Environmental Protection Agency on May 4, 2018, regarding former Naval Air Station, Moffett Field, California, under the Federal Facility Agreement for Naval Air Station, Moffett Field, which was entered into between the Navy and the Environmental Protection Agency in 1990 pursuant to section 120 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 ( 42 U.S.C. 9620 (c) Acceptance of payment If the Secretary of the Navy makes a transfer under subsection (a)(1)(A), the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall accept the amount transferred as payment in full of the penalty described in subsection (b). 315. Technical assistance for communities and individuals potentially affected by releases at current and former Department of Defense facilities (a) Technical assistance for navigation of response actions (1) In general Beginning not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and subject to such amounts as are provided in appropriations Acts, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of the Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation, shall furnish technical assistance services described in paragraph (3) through the Technical Assistance for Public Participation (TAPP) Program of the Department of Defense to communities, or individuals who are members thereof, that have been affected by a release of a pollutant affirmatively determined to have originated from a facility under the jurisdiction of, or formerly used by or under the jurisdiction of, the Department. (2) Implementation The Secretary, acting through the Director of the Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation, may furnish technical assistance services pursuant to paragraph (1) through a Federal interagency agreement, a private service provider, or a cooperative agreement entered into with a nonprofit organization. (3) Services provided The technical assistance services described in this paragraph are services to improve public participation in, or assist in the navigation of, environmental response efforts, including— (A) the provision of advice and guidance to a community or individual specified in paragraph (1) regarding additional technical assistance with respect to which such community or individual may be eligible (including pursuant to subsection (b)); (B) the interpretation of site-related documents; (C) the interpretation of health-related information; (D) assistance with the preparation of public comments; and (E) the development of outreach materials to improve public participation. (b) Grants for technical assistance (1) Authority Beginning not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and subject to such amounts as are provided in appropriations Acts, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of the Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation, shall administer a grant program under which the Director may award a grant to a community, or individuals who are members thereof, that have been affected by a release of a pollutant affirmatively determined to have originated from a facility under the jurisdiction of, or formerly used by or under the jurisdiction of, the Department of Defense. (2) Use of amounts Funds provided under a grant awarded pursuant to paragraph (1) in connection with a release of a pollutant at a facility may be used by the grant recipient only to obtain technical assistance and services for public participation in various stages of the processes of response, remediation, and removal actions at the facility, including— (A) interpreting the nature of the release, including monitoring and testing plans and reports associated with site assessment and characterization at the facility; (B) interpreting documents, plans, proposed actions, and final decisions related to— (i) an interim remedial action; (ii) a remedial investigation or feasibility study; (iii) a record of decision; (iv) a remedial design; (v) the selection and construction of remedial action; (vi) operation and maintenance; and (vii) a five-year review at the facility. (C) a removal action at such facility; and (D) services specified under subsection (a)(3). (c) Prohibition on use of amounts None of the amounts made available under this section may be used for the purpose of conducting— (1) lobbying activities; or (2) legal challenges of final decisions of the Department of Defense. C Treatment of Perfluoroalkyl Substances and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances 321. Treatment of certain materials contaminated with perfluoroalkyl substances or polyfluoroalkyl substances (a) In general The Secretary of Defense may treat covered materials, including soils that have been contaminated with PFAS, until the date on which the Secretary adopts the final rule required under section 343(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 10 U.S.C. 2701 (b) Definitions In this section, the terms covered material PFAS Public Law 117–81 10 U.S.C. 2701 322. Increase of transfer authority for funding of study and assessment on health implications of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances contamination in drinking water by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Section 316(a)(2)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 Public Law 115–232 Public Law 116–92 Public Law 116–283 Public Law 117–81 Public Law 117–263 (iv) Without regard to section 2215 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense may transfer not more than $5,000,000 during fiscal year 2024 to the Secretary of Health and Human Services to pay for the study and assessment required by this section. . 323. Modification of authority for environmental restoration projects at National Guard facilities (a) Clarification of definition of National Guard facilities Paragraph (4) of section 2700 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking State-owned (2) by striking owned and operated by a State when such land is (3) by striking even though such land is not under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense. without regard to— (A) the owner or operator of the facility; or (B) whether the facility is under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense or a military department. . (b) Inclusion under Defense Environmental Restoration Program Section 2701(a)(1) of such title is amended by striking State-owned (c) Response actions at National Guard facilities Section 2701(c)(1)(D) of such title is amended by striking State-owned (d) Services of other entities Section 2701(d)(1) of such title is amended, in the second sentence, by inserting or at a National Guard facility (e) Environmental restoration accounts Section 2703(g)(1) of such title is amended by inserting , a National Guard facility, Department of Defense (f) Technical and conforming amendments (1) Repeal Section 2707 of such title is amended by striking subsection (e). (2) Reference update Section 345(f)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 10 U.S.C. 2715 facility where military activities are conducted by the National Guard of a State pursuant to section 2707(e) of title 10, United States Code National Guard facility, as such term is defined in section 2700 of title 10, United States Code 324. Limitation on availability of travel funds until submittal of plan for restoring data sharing on testing of water for perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances (a) In general Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for operation and maintenance, defense-wide, for travel for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, not more than 85 percent may be obligated or expended until the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment submits to the congressional defense committees a plan to restore data sharing pertaining to the testing of water for perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances, as required under section 345 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 10 U.S.C. 2715 (1) A plan to restore data sharing with each relevant State agency tasked with regulation of environmental contamination by perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances in each State or territory of the United States. (2) A plan to restore data sharing with restoration advisory boards established under section 2705(d) of title 10, United States Code. (3) Information on the geographic specificity of the data to be provided under paragraphs (1) and (2) and a timeline for the implementation of the plans under such paragraphs. (b) Inability to meet transparency requirements If the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment determines that they are unable to meet the requirements under subsection (a), the Under Secretary shall brief the congressional defense committees on the rationale for why the restoration of data sharing required under such subsection is not possible, including a description of any legislative action required to restore such data sharing. 325. Dashboard of funding relating to perfluoroalkyl substances and polyfluoroalkyl substances The Secretary of Defense shall include with the submission to Congress by the President of the annual budget of the Department of Defense for a fiscal year under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, a separate budget justification document that consolidates all information pertaining to activities of the Department of Defense relating to perfluoroalkyl substances and polyfluoroalkyl substances, including funding for and descriptions of— (1) research and development efforts; (2) testing; (3) remediation; (4) contaminant disposal; and (5) community outreach. 326. Report on schedule and cost estimates for completion of testing and remediation of contaminated sites and publication of cleanup information (a) Report (1) In general Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and once every two years thereafter through December 31, 2029, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report detailing— (A) a proposed schedule for the completion of testing and remediation activities, including remediation of perfluoroalkyl substances and polyfluoroalkyl substances, at military installations, facilities of the National Guard, and formerly used defense sites in the United States where the Secretary obligated funding for environmental restoration activities in fiscal year 2022; (B) detailed cost estimates to complete such activities, if such estimates are available; and (C) if such estimates are not available, estimated costs to complete such activities based on historical costs of remediation for— (i) sites remediated under the Defense Environmental Restoration Program under section 2701 of title 10, United States Code; (ii) other Federally-funded sites; or (iii) privately-funded sites. (2) Inclusion of remedial investigations and feasibility studies The schedule and cost estimates required under paragraph (1) shall include a schedule and estimated costs for the completion of remedial investigations and feasibility studies at all sites covered under such paragraph for which such investigations and studies are anticipated or planned. (3) Military installation defined In this subsection, the term military installation (b) Publication of information Beginning not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall publish on the publicly available website established under section 331(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 10 U.S.C. 2701 327. Modification of timing of report on activities of PFAS Task Force Section 2714(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking and quarterly thereafter, and annually thereafter through 2029, 328. Government Accountability Office report on testing and remediation of perfluoroalkyl substances and polyfluoroalkyl substances Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and not later than five years thereafter, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the state of ongoing testing and remediation by the Department of Defense of current or former military installations contaminated with perfluoroalkyl substances or polyfluoroalkyl substances, including— (1) assessments of the thoroughness, pace, and cost-effectiveness of efforts of the Department to conduct testing and remediation relating to those substances; (2) recommendations to improve those efforts; and (3) such other matters as the Comptroller General determines appropriate. D Logistics and Sustainment 331. Assuring Critical Infrastructure Support for Military Contingencies Pilot Program (a) Establishment of pilot program Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a pilot program to be known as the Assuring Critical Infrastructure Support for Military Contingencies Pilot Program (b) Selection of installations (1) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and Hemispheric Affairs, shall select not fewer than four geographically diverse military installations at which to carry out the pilot program under subsection (a). (2) Prioritization (A) In general In selecting military installations under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall give priority to any military installation that is a key component of not fewer than two Contingency Plans (CONPLANs) or Operational Plans (OPLANs), with priority given to such plans in the area of responsibility of the United States Indo-Pacific Command or the United States European Command. (B) Additional priority If two or more military installations are given equal priority under subparagraph (A), priority for selection under paragraph (1) shall be given to the military installations that are— (i) connected to national-level infrastructure; (ii) located near a commercial port; or (iii) located near a national financial hub. (c) Activities In carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and Hemispheric Affairs, shall— (1) without duplicating or disrupting existing cyber exercise activities under the National Cyber Exercise Program under section 2220B of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 ( 6 U.S.C. 665h (A) to assess how to prioritize restoration of power, water, and telecommunications for a military installation in the event of a significant cyberattack on regional critical infrastructure that has similar impacts on State and local infrastructure; and (B) to determine the recovery process needed to ensure the military installation can function and support an overseas contingency operation or a homeland defense mission, as appropriate; (2) map dependencies of power, water, and telecommunications at the military installation and the connections to distribution and generation outside the military installation; (3) recommend priorities for the order of recovery for the military installation in the event of a significant cyberattack, considering both the requirements needed for operations of the military installation and the potential participation of personnel at the military installation in an overseas contingency operation or a homeland defense mission; and (4) create a lessons-learned database from the exercises conducted under paragraph (1) across all installations participating in the pilot program to share with the appropriate committees of Congress. (d) Coordination with related programs The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and Hemispheric Affairs, shall ensure that activities under subsection (c) are coordinated with— (1) private entities that operate power, water, and telecommunications for a military installation participating in the pilot program under subsection (a); (2) relevant military and civilian personnel; and (3) any other entity that the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and Hemispheric Affairs determines is relevant to the execution of activities under subsection (c). (e) Report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security, the National Cyber Director, the head of any other relevant Sector Risk Management Agency, the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, and, if appropriate, relevant private sector owners and operators of critical infrastructure a report on the activities carried out under pilot program under subsection (a), including a description of any operational challenges identified. (f) Definitions In this section: (1) Critical infrastructure The term critical infrastructure 42 U.S.C. 5195c (2) Sector Risk Management Agency The term Sector Risk Management Agency 6 U.S.C. 650 332. Strategy and assessment on use of automation and artificial intelligence for shipyard optimization (a) Strategy The Secretary of Navy, in coordination with the Shipyard Infrastructure Optimization Program, shall develop and implement a strategy to leverage commercial best practices used in shipyards to make operations more efficient and demonstrate a digital maintenance artificial intelligence platform that analyzes data on the maintenance and health of shipboard assets of the Navy at shipyards, which shall improve readiness of the Armed Forces, predict and diagnose issues before they occur, and lower maintenance costs. (b) Assessment The Secretary of Navy shall assess the costs of maintenance delays on shipboard assets of the Navy and assess the potential cost savings of adopting artificial intelligence predictive maintenance technology techniques that help determine the condition of in-service equipment to estimate when maintenance should be performed rather than waiting until failure or end of life, including— (1) an analysis of maintenance delays and costs due to unplanned and unpredicted maintenance issues; (2) an evaluation of opportunities to demonstrate commercial best practices at shipyards, including artificial intelligence technologies to ensure timely predictions for maintainers and planners at shipyards by connecting datasets, executing models, and providing outputs in near real-time; (3) an identification of shipyard assets of the Navy with sufficient data available to enable near-term demonstrations of artificial intelligence predictive maintenance and an estimate of resources needed within the Navy to accelerate the demonstration of predictive artificial intelligence capabilities with respect to those assets; and (4) an identification of any policy or technical challenges to implementing artificial intelligence or machine learning for purposes of carrying out the Shipyard Infrastructure Optimization Program. (c) Briefing to committee Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Navy shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on— (1) the strategy developed by the Secretary under subsection (a); (2) the results of the assessment under subsection (b); and (3) a plan to execute any measures pursuant to such assessment. E Briefings and Reports 341. Critical infrastructure conditions at military installations (a) Plan Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the head of each military department, shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a plan to implement a standardized system to measure and report on the condition and performance of, level of investment in, and any applicable risks to critical infrastructure systems owned by the Federal Government that— (1) have not been privatized pursuant to a conveyance under section 2688 of title 10, United States Code; and (2) are located on a military installation. (b) Report (1) In general Beginning on February 1 of the year immediately following the date on which the plan under subsection (a) is submitted, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the head of each military department, shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a consolidated report on the condition of critical infrastructure systems owned by the Federal Government at military installations. (2) Elements Each report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) Installation-level critical infrastructure system data for each critical infrastructure system owned by the Federal Government located at a military installation that includes the following for each such system: (i) All instances of noncompliance with any applicable Federal or State law (including regulations) with which the system has been required to comply during the preceding five-year period, including information on any prior or current consent order or equivalent compliance agreement with any regulatory agency. (ii) The year of original installation of major critical infrastructure system components, including treatment facilities, pump stations, and storage tanks. (iii) The average age of distribution system piping and wiring. (iv) The rate of system recapitalization, represented as an annual percentage replacement rate of all critical infrastructure system assets. (v) The percentage of key system operational components inspected, and determined through actual testing to be fully operational, during the preceding one-year period, including fire hydrants, valves, and backflow preventors. (vi) The absolute number, and a normalized measure for comparative purposes, of all unplanned system outages during the preceding one-year period. (vii) The absolute duration, and a normalized measure for comparative purposes, of all unplanned system outages during the preceding one-year period. (viii) The absolute number, and a normalized measure for comparative purposes, of all critical infrastructure system main breaks and leaks during the preceding one-year period. (B) A standardized risk assessment for each military installation, identifying the current and projected level of risk related to the following: (i) The ability to maintain compliance with all current and known future regulatory agency regulations and standards and all applicable regulations and policies of the Department of Defense and the military departments related to critical infrastructure, and the ability to operate systems in accordance with accepted industry standards. (ii) The ability to maintain a consistent and compliant supply of water for current and projected future installation needs based on current and projected source water availability and quality, including an assessment of source water contamination risks. (iii) The ability to withstand severe weather events, including drought, flooding, and temperature fluctuations. (iv) The ability for utility industrial controls systems to maintain compliance with current and future cybersecurity standards and regulations. 342. Report on establishing sufficient stabling, pasture, and training area for the Old Guard Caisson Platoon equines (a) In general Not later than March 1, 2024, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the results of a study to address the feasibility and advisability of establishing sufficient stabling, pasture, and training area for the equines in the Caisson Platoon of the 3rd United States Infantry (commonly known as the Old Guard (b) Inclusion of recommendations The report required under subsection (a) shall include— (1) any recommendations determined necessary and appropriate by the Secretary— (A) to implement the plan required under section 391(b) of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 (B) to ensure proper animal facility sanitation for the equines in the Caisson Platoon of the 3rd United States Infantry; and (2) plans for the housing and care of such equines. (c) Locations (1) Review of military construction authorization The report required under subsection (a) shall include a review of all physical locations under consideration as stabling, pasture, or training area described in such subsection for any withdrawals or projects that would require individual military construction authorization. (2) Consideration In considering locations for stabling, pasture, or training area under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Army shall consider all viable options within a reasonable distance to Arlington National Cemetery. (d) Elements The report required under subsection (a) shall include, for each location under consideration as stabling, pasture, or training area described in such subsection— (1) a brief environmental assessment of the location; (2) estimated costs for preparing the location for construction; (3) a narrative of how the location will be beneficial and conducive the health of the equines in the Caisson Platoon of the 3rd United States Infantry; (4) a narrative of how, if necessary, the location can be expanded; and (5) a narrative of how the location will affect community access to outdoor recreation. 343. Quarterly briefings on operational status of amphibious warship fleet of Department of the Navy (a) In general Not later than October 1, 2023, and quarterly thereafter until September 30, 2024, the Secretary of the Navy shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a briefing on the operational status of the amphibious warship fleet of the Department of the Navy. (b) Elements Each briefing under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to each amphibious warship, the following: (1) Average quarterly Operational Availability (AO). (2) Number of days underway as follows: (A) Training for the purpose of supporting Mission Essential Tasks (in this section referred to as MET (B) Deployed, which shall not include scheduled or unscheduled in port maintenance. (3) Expected completion date for in-work and scheduled and unscheduled maintenance. (4) An update on any delays in completion of scheduled and unscheduled maintenance and casualty reports impacting the following: (A) Scheduled unit level well-deck and flight-deck operations training of the Marine Corps. (B) MET certifications of the Marine Corps, including mobility, communications, amphibious well-deck operations, aviation operations, and warfare training. (C) Composition and deployment dates of scheduled and deployed Amphibious Ready Groups and Marine Expeditionary Units. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) Amphibious warship The term amphibious warship (2) Amphibious Ready Group; Marine Expeditionary Unit The terms Amphibious Ready Group Marine Expeditionary Unit (A) three amphibious assault ships (general purpose) (LHA) or amphibious assault ships (multi-purpose) (LHD); and (B) one amphibious transport dock (LPD) Flight I. 344. Briefing on plan for maintaining proficiency in emergency movement of munitions in Joint Region Marianas, Guam Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Air Force shall brief the congressional defense committees on a plan for maintaining the proficiency of the Navy and the Air Force, respectively, in executing the emergency movement of munitions stored in weapons storage areas in Joint Region Marianas, Guam, onto aircraft and naval vessels, including plans to regularly exercise such capabilities. F Other Matters 351. Continued designation of Secretary of the Navy as executive agent for Naval Small Craft Instruction and Technical Training School The Secretary of the Navy shall continue, through fiscal year 2024— (1) to perform the responsibilities of the Department of Defense executive agent for the Naval Small Craft Instruction and Technical Training School pursuant to section 352(b) of title 10, United States Code; and (2) in coordination with the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command, to provide such support, as necessary, for the continued operation of such school. 352. Restriction on retirement of U–28 Aircraft None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be used to retire U–28 aircraft until the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that the future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, with respect to the United States Special Operations Command provides for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capacity and capability that is equal to or greater than such capacity and capability provided by the current fleet of U–28 aircraft for such Command. 353. Tribal liaisons (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each installation of the Department of Defense that has an Indian Tribe, Native Hawaiian organization, or Tribal interests in the area surrounding the installation, including if an Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian organization is historically or culturally affiliated with the land or water managed or directly impacted by the installation, has a dedicated Tribal liaison located at the installation. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) Indian Tribe The term Indian Tribe 25 U.S.C. 5304(e) (2) Native Hawaiian organization The term Native Hawaiian organization 20 U.S.C. 7517 354. Limitation on use of funds to expand leased facilities for the Joint Military Information Support Operations Web Operations Center None of the amounts authorized by this Act for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide to expand leased facilities for the Joint Military Information Support Operations Web Operations Center may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict and the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command, submits to the congressional defense committees a validated manpower study for such center that includes the following: (1) Validated estimates of the number of personnel from the United States Special Operations Command and the other combatant commands that will be housed in leased facilities of such center. (2) An explanation of how such estimates are aligned with and support the priorities established by the national defense strategy under 113(g) of title 10, United States Code. 355. Modifications to the Contested Logistics Working Group of the Department of Defense (a) Expansion of working group (1) In general Paragraph (3) of section 2926(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (D) A representative appointed by the Secretary of Defense from each of the following: (i) The Defense Logistics Agency. (ii) The Strategic Capabilities Office. (iii) The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. (iv) The Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. . (2) Timing Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall appoint the additional members of the working group required under paragraph (3)(D) of such section, as added by paragraph (1) of this subsection. (b) Meetings Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (6) The working group under paragraph (1) shall meet not less frequently than quarterly. . (c) Reports Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (7) Not later than February 1 of each year, the working group under paragraph (1) shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that contains a description of any shortfalls in personnel, equipment, infrastructure, energy and storage, or capabilities required to support the operational plans of the Department of Defense. . 356. Establishment of Caisson Platoon to support military and State funeral services (a) In general There is established in the Department of the Army an equine unit, to be known as the Caisson Platoon, assigned to the 3rd Infantry Regiment of the Army, for the purposes of conducting military and State funerals and for other purposes. (b) Prohibition on elimination The Secretary of the Army may not eliminate the Caisson Platoon of the 3rd Infantry Regiment of the Army established under subsection (a). (c) Briefing (1) In general Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and not less frequently than every 180 days thereafter until March 31, 2027, the Secretary of the Army shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the health, welfare, and sustainment of military working equids. (2) Elements The briefing required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An assessment of the ability of the Caisson Platoon of the 3rd Infantry Regiment of the Army to support military funeral operations within Arlington National Cemetery, including milestones associated with achieving full operational capability for the Caisson Platoon. (B) An update on the plan of the task force of the Army on military working equids to promote, support, and sustain animal health and welfare. (C) An update on the plan of such task force to ensure that support by the Caisson Platoon of Arlington National Cemetery and State funerals is never suspended again. 357. Limitation on availability of funds pending 30-year shipbuilding plan that maintains 31 amphibious warships for the Department of the Navy (a) Limitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2024 for Administration and Servicewide Activities, Operation and Maintenance, Navy, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of the Navy submits to the congressional defense committees a 30-year shipbuilding plan that meets the statutory requirement in section 8062(b) of title 10, United States Code, to maintain 31 amphibious warships. (b) Amphibious warship defined In this section, the term amphibious warship 358. Modification of rule of construction regarding provision of support and services to non-Department of Defense organizations and activities Section 2012(i) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively; (2) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), as redesignated by paragraph (1), by striking Nothing in this section (1) Nothing in this section (3) in subparagraph (A), as so redesignated, by inserting , except as provided in paragraph (2), for response (4) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) Funds available to the Secretary of a military department for operation and maintenance for the Innovative Readiness Training program may be expended under this section, upon approval by the Secretary concerned, to assist in demolition, clearing of roads, infrastructure improvements, and construction to restore an area after a natural disaster. . IV Military personnel authorizations A Active forces 401. End strengths for active forces The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty personnel as of September 30, 2024, as follows: (1) The Army, 452,000. (2) The Navy, 342,000. (3) The Marine Corps, 172,300. (4) The Air Force, 320,000. (5) The Space Force, 9,400. 402. End strength level matters Section 115 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (f)(2), by striking not more than 2 percent not more than 3 percent (2) in subsection (g)(1), by striking subparagraphs (A) and (B) and inserting the following new subparagraphs: (A) vary the end strength pursuant to subsection (a)(1)(A) for a fiscal year for the armed force or forces under the jurisdiction of that Secretary by a number not equal to more than 2 percent of such authorized end strength; (B) vary the end strength pursuant to subsection (a)(1)(B) for a fiscal year for the armed force or forces under the jurisdiction of that Secretary by a number not equal to more than 2 percent of such authorized end strength; and (C) vary the end strength pursuant to subsection (a)(2) for a fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of the reserve component of the armed force or forces under the jurisdiction of that Secretary by a number equal to not more than 2 percent of such authorized end strength. . 403. Extension of additional authority to vary Space Force end strength Section 403(b) of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 December 31, 2023 October 1, 2025 B Reserve forces 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve (a) In general The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of September 30, 2024, as follows: (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 325,000. (2) The Army Reserve, 174,800. (3) The Navy Reserve, 57,200. (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 33,600. (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 105,000. (6) The Air Force Reserve, 69,600. (7) The Coast Guard Reserve, 7,000. (b) End strength reductions The end strengths prescribed by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component shall be proportionately reduced by— (1) the total authorized strength of units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component which are on active duty (other than for training) at the end of the fiscal year; and (2) the total number of individual members not in units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component who are on active duty (other than for training or for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their consent at the end of the fiscal year. (c) End strength increases Whenever units or individual members of the Selected Reserve for any reserve component are released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such units and by the total number of such individual members. 412 . End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the Reserves Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of September 30, 2024, the following number of Reserves to be serving on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the case of members of the National Guard, for the purpose of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training the reserve components: (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 30,845. (2) The Army Reserve, 16,511. (3) The Navy Reserve, 10,327. (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 2,355. (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 25,333. (6) The Air Force Reserve, 6,003. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status) (a) In general The minimum number of military technicians (dual status) as of the last day of fiscal year 2024 for the reserve components of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding section 129 of title 10, United States Code) shall be the following: (1) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 22,294. (2) For the Army Reserve, 7,990. (3) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 10,994. (4) For the Air Force Reserve, 7,111. (b) Limitation on number of temporary military technicians (dual status) The number of temporary military technicians (dual status) employed under the authority of subsection (a) may not exceed 25 percent of the total authorized number specified in such subsection. (c) Limitation Under no circumstances may a military technician (dual status) employed under the authority of this section be coerced by a State into accepting an offer of realignment or conversion to any other military status, including as a member of the Active, Guard, and Reserve program of a reserve component. If a military technician (dual status) declines to participate in such realignment or conversion, no further action will be taken against the individual or the individual’s position. 414. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support During fiscal year 2024, the maximum number of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving at any time on full-time operational support duty under section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, is the following: (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 17,000. (2) The Army Reserve, 13,000. (3) The Navy Reserve, 6,200. (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 3,000. (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 16,000. (6) The Air Force Reserve, 14,000. C Authorization of appropriations 421. Military personnel (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2024 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4401. (b) Construction of authorization The authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other authorization of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for such purpose for fiscal year 2024. V Military personnel policy A Officer personnel policy 501. Authorized strength: general and flag officers on active duty (a) Repeal of obsolete authority; redesignation Chapter 32 (1) by repealing section 526; (2) by redesignating section 526a as section 526; (3) in the table of sections for such chapter, by striking the item relating to section 526a; and (4) in the section heading for section 526, as redesignated by paragraph (2), by striking after December 31, 2022 (b) Increased authorized strength Section 526 of title 10, United States Code, as redesignated and amended by subsection (a), is further amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) by striking after December 31, 2022, (B) in paragraph (1), by striking 218 219 (C) in paragraph (2), by striking 149 150 (D) in paragraph (3), by striking 170 171 (E) in paragraph (4), by striking 62 64 (2) by redesignating the second subsection designated as subsection (i) as subsection (j). (c) Repeal of exclusion of officers serving as lead special trial counsel from limitations on authorized strengths Section 506 of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 is hereby repealed. 502. Prohibition on appointment or nomination of certain officers who are subject to special selection review boards (a) Officers on active-duty list Section 628a(a)(2)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (B) shall not be forwarded for appointment or nomination to the Secretary of Defense, the President, or the Senate, as applicable. . (b) Officers on reserve active-status list Section 14502a(a)(2)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (B) shall not be forwarded for appointment or nomination to the Secretary of Defense, the President, or the Senate, as applicable. . 503. Exclusion of officers who are licensed behavioral health providers from limitations on active duty commissioned officer end strengths Section 523(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (10) Officers who are licensed behavioral health providers, including clinical psychologists, social workers, and mental health nurse practitioners. . 504. Updating authority to authorize promotion transfers between components of the same service or a different service (a) Warrant officers transferred between components within the same or a different uniformed service Section 578 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (g) Notwithstanding subsection (d), and subject to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, in the case of a warrant officer who is selected for promotion by a selection board convened under this chapter, and prior to the placement of the warrant officer’s name on the applicable promotion list is approved for transfer to a new component within the same or a different uniformed service, the Secretary concerned may place the warrant officer’s name on a corresponding promotion list of the new component without regard to the warrant officer’s competitive category. A warrant officer’s promotion under this subsection shall be made pursuant to section 12242 of this title. . (b) Officers transferred to reserve active status list (1) In general Section 624 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections: (e) Notwithstanding subsection (a)(2), in the case of an officer who is selected for promotion by a selection board convened under this chapter, and prior to the placement of the officer’s name on the applicable promotion list is approved for transfer to the reserve active status list of the same or a different uniformed service, the Secretary concerned may place the officer’s name on a corresponding promotion list on the reserve active-status list without regard to the officer’s competitive category. An officer’s promotion under this subsection shall be made pursuant to section 14308 of this title. (f) Notwithstanding subsection (a)(3), in the case of an officer who is placed on an all-fully-qualified-officers list, and is subsequently approved for transfer to the reserve active status list, the Secretary concerned may place the officer’s name on an appropriate all-fully-qualified-officers list on the reserve active status list. An officer’s promotion under this subsection shall be made pursuant to section 14308 of this title. . (2) Date of rank Section 14308(c) of such title is amended— (A) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and (B) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph: (3) The Secretary concerned may adjust the date of rank of an officer whose name is placed on a reserve active status promotion list pursuant to subsection (e) or (f) of section 624 of this title. . 505. Effect of failure of selection for promotion (a) Effect of failure of selection for promotion: captains and majors of the Army, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Space Force and lieutenants and lieutenant commanders of the Navy (1) In general Section 632 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) in the section heading, by striking and Marine Corps Marine Corps, and Space Force (B) in subsection (a)(1), by striking President approves the report of the board which considered him for the second time Secretary concerned releases the promotion results of the board which considered the officer for the second time to the public (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 36 632. Effect of failure of selection for promotion: captains and majors of the Army, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Space Force and lieutenants and lieutenant commanders of the Navy. . (b) Retirement of regular officers of the Navy for length of service or failure of selection for promotion Section 8372(a)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking President approves the report of the board which considered him for the second time Secretary concerned releases the promotion results of the board which considered the officer for the second time to the public 506. Permanent authority to order retired members to active duty in high-demand, low-density appointments (a) In general Section 688a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the section heading, by striking Retired aviators: temporary authority Authority (2) by striking subsection (f); (3) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as subsections (f) and (g), respectively; and (4) in subsection (f), as redesignated by paragraph (3), by striking limitations in subsections (c) and (f) limitation in subsection (c) (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 39 688a. Authority to order to active duty in high-demand, low-density assignments. . 507. Waiver authority expansion for the extension of service obligation for Marine Corps cyberspace operations officers (a) Required service Section 651(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting or in the case of an unrestricted officer designated within a cyberspace occupational specialty (2) in paragraph (2)— (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ; or (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period and inserting ; or (C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (C) in the case of an unrestricted officer who has been designated with a cyberspace occupational specialty, the period of obligated service specified in such contract or agreement. . (b) Minimum service requirement for certain cyberspace occupational specialties (1) In general Chapter 37 section 653 654. Minimum service requirement for certain cyberspace occupational specialties (a) Cyberspace operations officer The minimum service obligation for any member who successfully completes training in the armed forces in direct accession to the cyberspace operations officer occupational specialty of the Marine Corps shall be 8 years. (b) Service obligation defined In this section, the term service obligation . (2) Table of sections amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter 37 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 653 the following new item: 654. Minimum service requirement for certain cyberspace occupational specialties. . 508. Removal of active duty prohibition for members of the Air Force Reserve Policy Committee Section 10305 of title 10, United States Code, is amended― (1) in subsection (b), by striking not on active duty (2) in subsection (c)— (A) by inserting of the reserve components among the members (B) by striking not on active duty 509. Extension of authority to vary number of Space Force officers considered for promotion to major general Subsection (b) of section 503 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 shall terminate on December 31, 2022 shall terminate on December 31, 2024 510. Realignment of Navy spot-promotion quotas Section 605(g)(4)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 325 425 511. Modification of limitation on promotion selection board rates Section 616 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (d)— (A) by striking The number (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the number (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) If a promotion zone established under section 623 of this title includes less than 50 officers and is established with respect to promotions to a grade below the grade of colonel or Navy captain, the Secretary concerned may authorize selection boards convened under section 611(a) of this title to recommend for promotion a number equal to not more than 100 percent of the number of officers included in such promotion zone. ; and (2) in subsection (e), by striking unless he unless the officer 512. Time in grade requirements Section 1305 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(3), by inserting or a Marine Corps Marine Gunner warrant officer in such grade, chief warrant officer, W–5, (2) in subsection (b), by striking when he when the warrant officer (3) in subsection (c)— (A) by striking as he as the Secretary concerned (B) by striking after he after the warrant officer 513. Flexibility in determining terms of appointment for certain senior officer positions (a) In general Chapter 35 section 601 602. Flexibility in determining terms of appointment for certain senior officer positions The Secretary of Defense may extend or reduce the duration of an appointment made under section 152, 154, 7033, 8033, 8043, 9033, and 9082 of this title by up to six months if the Secretary determines that such an extension or reduction is necessary either in the interests of national defense, or to ensure an appropriate staggering of terms of senior military leadership. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 35 section 601 602. Flexibility in determining terms of appointment for certain senior officer positions. . B Reserve component management 521. Alternative promotion authority for reserve officers in designated competitive categories (a) In general Part III of subtitle E of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new chapter: 1413 Alternative promotion authority for officers in designated competitive categories Sec. 15101. Officers in designated competitive categories. 15102. Selection for promotion. 15103. Eligibility for consideration for promotion. 15104. Opportunities for consideration for promotion. 15105. Promotions. 15106. Failure of selection for promotion. 15107. Retirement: retirement for years of service; selective early retirement. 15108. Continuation on the Reserve Active-Status List. 15109. Other administrative authorities. 15110. Regulations. 15101. Officers in designated competitive categories (a) Authority to designate competitive categories of officers Each Secretary of a military department may designate one or more competitive categories for promotion of officers under section 14005 of this title that are under the jurisdiction of such Secretary as a competitive category of officers whose promotion, retirement, and continuation on the reserve active-status list shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter. (b) Limitation on exercise of authority The Secretary of a military department may not designate a competitive category of officers for purposes of this chapter until 60 days after the date on which the Secretary submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the designation of the competitive category. The report on the designation of a competitive category shall set forth the following: (1) A detailed description of officer requirements for officers within the competitive category. (2) An explanation of the number of opportunities for consideration for promotion to each particular grade, and an estimate of promotion timing, within the competitive category. (3) An estimate of the size of the promotion zone for each grade within the competitive category. (4) A description of any other matters the Secretary considered in determining to designate the competitive category for purposes of this chapter. 15102. Selection for promotion (a) In general Except as provided in this section, the selection for promotion of officers in any competitive category of officers designated for purposes of this chapter shall be governed by the provisions under chapter 1403 of this title. (b) No recommendation for promotion of officers below promotion zone Section 14301(d) of this title shall not apply to the selection for promotion of officers described in subsection (a). (c) Recommendation for officers to be excluded from future consideration for promotion In making recommendations pursuant to chapter 1403 of this title for purposes of the administration of this chapter, a selection board convened under section 14101(a) of this title may recommend that an officer considered by the board be excluded from future consideration for promotion under this chapter. 15103. Eligibility for consideration for promotion (a) In general Except as provided by this section, eligibility for promotion of officers in any competitive category of officers designated for purposes of this chapter shall be governed by the provisions of sections 14301, 14303, and 14304 of this title. (b) Inapplicability of certain time-in-grade requirements Sections 14303 and 14304 of this title shall not apply to the promotion of officers described in subsection (a). (c) Inapplicability to officers above and below promotion zone The following provisions of this title shall not apply to the promotion of officers described in subsection (a): (1) The reference in section 14301(b) to an officer above the promotion zone. (2) Section 14301(d). (d) Ineligibility of certain officers The following officers are not eligible for promotion under this chapter: (1) An officer described in section 14301(c) of this title. (2) An officer not included within the promotion zone. (3) An officer who has failed of promotion to a higher grade the maximum number of times specified for opportunities for promotion for such grade within the competitive category concerned pursuant to section 15104 of this title. (4) An officer recommended by a selection board to be removed from consideration for promotion in accordance with section 15102(c) of this title. 15104. Opportunities for consideration for promotion (a) Specification of number of opportunities for consideration for promotion In designating a competitive category of officers pursuant to section 15101 of this title, the Secretary of a military department shall specify the number of opportunities for consideration for promotion to be afforded officers of the armed force concerned within the category for promotion to each grade above the grade of first lieutenant or lieutenant (junior grade), as applicable. (b) Limited authority of secretary of military department to modify number of opportunities The Secretary of a military department may modify the number of opportunities for consideration for promotion to be afforded officers of an armed force within a competitive category for promotion to a particular grade, as previously specified by the Secretary pursuant subsection (a) of this subsection, not more frequently than once every five years. (c) Discretionary authority of Secretary of defense to modify number of opportunities The Secretary of Defense may modify the number of opportunities for consideration for promotion to be afforded officers of an armed force within a competitive category for promotion to a particular grade, as previously specified or modified pursuant to any provision of this section, at the discretion of the Secretary. (d) Limitation on number of opportunities specified The number of opportunities for consideration for promotion to be afforded officers of an armed force within a competitive category for promotion to a particular grade, as specified or modified pursuant to any provision of this section, may not exceed five opportunities. (e) Effect of certain reduction in number of opportunities specified If, by reason of a reduction in the number of opportunities for consideration for promotion under this section, an officer would no longer have one or more opportunities for consideration for promotion that were available to the officer before the reduction, the officer shall be afforded one additional opportunity for consideration for promotion after the reduction. 15105. Promotions Sections 14307 through 14317 of this title shall apply in promotions of officers in competitive categories of officers designated for purposes of this chapter. 15106. Failure of selection for promotion (a) In general Except as provided in this section, sections 14501 through 14513 of this title shall apply to promotions of officers in competitive categories of officers designated for purposes of this chapter. (b) Inapplicability of failure of selection for promotion to officers above promotion zone The reference in section 14501 of this title to an officer above the promotion zone shall not apply in the promotion of officers described in subsection (a). (c) Special selection board matters The reference in section 14502(a)(1) of this title to a person above the promotion zone shall not apply in the promotion of officers described in subsection (a). (d) Effect of failure of selection In the administration of this chapter pursuant to subsection (a)— (1) an officer described in subsection (a) shall not be deemed to have failed twice of selection for promotion for purposes of section 14502(b) of this title until the officer has failed selection of promotion to the next higher grade the maximum number of times specified for opportunities for promotion to such grade within the competitive category concerned pursuant to section 15104 of this title; and (2) any reference in sections 14504 through 14506 of this title to an officer who has failed of selection for promotion to the next higher grade for the second time shall be deemed to refer instead to an officer described in subsection (a) who has failed of selection for promotion to the next higher grade for the maximum number of times specified for opportunities for promotion to such grade within the competitive category concerned pursuant to such section 15104. 15107. Retirement: retirement for years of service; selective early retirement (a) Retirement for years of service Sections 14507 through 14515 of this title shall apply to the retirement of officers in competitive categories of officers designated for purposes of this chapter. (b) Selective early retirement Section 14101(b) of this title shall apply to the retirement of officers described in subsection (a). 15108. Continuation on the Reserve Active-Status List Sections 14701 through 14703 of this title shall apply in continuation or retention on a reserve active-status list of officers designated for purposes of this chapter. 15109. Other administrative authorities (a) In general The following provisions of this title shall apply to officers in competitive categories of officers designated for purposes of this chapter: (1) Section 14518, relating to continuation of officers to complete disciplinary action. (2) Section 14519, relating to deferment of retirement or separation for medical reasons. (3) Section 14704, relating to the selective early removal from the reserve active-status list. (4) Section 14705, relating to the selective early retirement of reserve general and flag officers of the Navy and Marine Corps. 15110. Regulations The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations regarding the administration of this chapter. The elements of such regulations shall include mechanisms to clarify the manner in which provisions of other chapters of this part of the title shall be used in the administration of this chapter in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. . (b) Table of chapters amendment The table of chapters at the beginning of part III of subtitle E of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 1413. Alternative promotion authority for officers in designated competitive categories 15101 . 522. Selected Reserve and Ready Reserve order to active duty to respond to a significant cyber incident Section 12304 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking for any named operational mission (2) by redesignating subsections (c) through (j) as subsections (d) through (k), respectively; (3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection: (c) Significant cyber incidents The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating may, without the consent of the member affected, order any unit, and any member not assigned to a unit organized to serve as a unit, of the Selected Reserve or Individual Ready Reserve to active duty for a continuous period of not more than 365 days when the Secretary of Defense or, with respect to the Coast Guard, the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating determines it is necessary to augment the active forces for the respective responses from the Department of Defense or the Department of Homeland Security to a covered incident. ; (4) in paragraph (1) of subsection (d), as redesignated by paragraph (2) of this section, by inserting or subsection (c) subsection (b) (5) in subsection (h) (as so redesignated)— (A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively; (B) by striking Whenever any (1) Whenever any (C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) Whenever any unit of the Selected Reserve or any member of the Selected Reserve not assigned to a unit organized to serve as a unit, or any member of the Individual Ready Reserve, is ordered to active duty under authority of subsection (c), the service of all units or members so ordered to active duty may be terminated by— (A) order of the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating; or (B) law. ; and (6) in subsection (k) (as so redesignated)— (A) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and (B) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph: (2) The term covered incident (A) a cyber incident involving a Department of Defense information system, or a breach of a Department of Defense system that involves personally identifiable information, that the Secretary of Defense determines is likely to result in demonstrable harm to the national security interests, foreign relations, or the economy of the United States, or to the public confidence, civil liberties, or public health and safety of the people of the United States; (B) a cyber incident involving a Department of Homeland Security information system or a breach of a Department of Homeland Security system that involves personally identifiable information that the Secretary of Homeland Security determines is likely to result in demonstrable harm to the national security interests, foreign relations, or the economy of the United States or to the public confidence, civil liberties, or public health and safety of the people of the United States; (C) a cyber incident or collection of related cyber incidents that the President determines is likely to result in demonstrable harm to the national security interests, foreign relations, or economy of the United States or to the public confidence, civil liberties, or public health and safety of the people of the United States; or (D) a significant incident declared pursuant to section 2233 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 ( 6 U.S.C. 677b . 523. Mobilization of Selected Reserve for preplanned missions in support of the combatant commands Section 12304b(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively; (2) by striking Units (A) Except as provided under subparagraph (B), units (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (B) In the event the President's budget is delivered later than April 1st in the year prior to the year of the mobilization of one or more units under this section, the Secretary concerned may submit to Congress the information required under subparagraph (A) in a separate notice. . 524. Alternating selection of officers of the National Guard and the Reserves as deputy commanders of certain combatant commands Section 164(e)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting (A) At least one deputy commander (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs: (B) In carrying out the requirement in subparagraph (A) pertaining to the selection of an officer of the reserve component, the Secretary of Defense shall alternate between selecting an officer of the National Guard and an officer of the Reserves no less frequently than every two terms. (C) The Secretary of Defense may waive the requirement under subparagraph (B) regarding the alternating selection of reserve component officers if the Secretary of Defense determines that such action is in the national interest. . 525. Grade of Vice Chief of the National Guard Bureau Section 10505 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (c) Grade and Exclusion From General and Flag Officer Authorized Strength (1) The Vice Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall be appointed to serve in the grade of general. (2) The Secretary of Defense shall designate, pursuant to subsection (b) of section 526a of this title, the position of Vice Chief of the National Guard Bureau as one of the general officer and flag officer positions to be excluded from the limitations in subsection (a) of such section. . C General service authorities and military records 531. Modification of limitation on enlistment and induction of persons whose score on the Armed Forces Qualification Test is below a prescribed level Section 520(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking The number of persons (1) The number of persons (2) by striking may not exceed 20 percent may not exceed 4 percent (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) Upon the request of the Secretary concerned, the Secretary of Defense may authorize an armed force to increase the limitation specified in paragraph (1) to not exceed 20 percent of the total number of persons originally enlisted or inducted to serve on active duty (other than active duty for training) in such armed forced during such fiscal year. The Secretary of Defense shall notify the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives not later than 30 days after using such authority. . 532. Non-medical counseling services for military families Section 1781 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (d) Non-medical counseling services (1) In carrying out its duties under subsection (b), the Office may coordinate programs and activities to provide non-medical counseling services to military families through the Department of Defense Military and Family Life Counseling Program. (2) A mental health care professional described in paragraph (3) may provide non-medical counseling services at any location in a State, the District of Columbia, or a territory or possession of the United States, without regard to where the professional or recipient of such services is located or delivery of such services is provided (including face-to-face and telehealth), if the provision of such services is within the scope of the authorized Federal duties of the professional. (3) A non-medical mental health professional described in this subsection is a person who is— (A) a currently licensed mental health care provider who holds a license that is— (i) issued by a State, the District of Columbia, or a territory or possession of the United States; and (ii) recognized by the Secretary of Defense as an appropriate license for the provision of non-medical counseling services; (B) a member of the armed forces, a civilian employee of the Department of Defense, or a contractor designated by the Secretary; and (C) performing authorized duties for the Department of Defense under a program or activity referred to in paragraph (1). (4) The authority under this subsection shall terminate three years after the date of the enactment of this subsection. (5) In this subsection, the term non-medical counseling services . 533. Primacy of needs of the service in determining individual duty assignments (a) In general Chapter 39 section 674 675. Primacy of needs of the service in determining individual duty assignments (a) In general The Secretaries of the military departments shall make duty assignments of individual members based on the needs of the military services. (b) Assignments based on service needs A servicemember’s opinion on State laws shall not take precedence over the needs of the military services in determining individual duty assignments. (c) Rule of construction Nothing in this section shall be construed as prohibiting the Secretaries of the military departments from considering the general preferences of members of the armed forces in making determinations about individual duty assignments. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 674 the following new item: 675. Primacy of needs of the service in determining individual duty assignments. . 534. Requirement to use qualifications, performance, and merit as basis for promotions, assignments, and other personnel actions The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that all promotions, assignments, and other personnel actions of the Armed Forces are based primarily on qualifications, performance, and merit. 535. Requirement to base treatment in the military on merit and performance (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) The United States Armed Forces is the greatest civil rights program in the history of the world. (2) Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs General Colin Powell wrote that the military [has] given African-Americans more equal opportunity than any other institution in American society (3) Today’s Armed Forces is the most diverse large public institution in the country, and brings together Americans from every background in the service of defending the country. (4) Military readiness depends on the guarantee of equal opportunity, without the promise of an equal outcome, because warfare is a competitive endeavor and the nation’s enemies must know that the United States Armed Forces is led by the best, brightest, and bravest Americans. (5) The tenets of critical race theory are antithetical to the merit-based, all-volunteer, military that has served the country with great distinction for the last 50 years. (b) Definition of equity For the purposes of any Department of Defense Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion directive, program, policy, or instruction, the term equity the right of all persons to have the opportunity to participate in, and benefit from, programs, and activities for which they are qualified (c) Prohibitions (1) Directives The Department of Defense shall not direct or otherwise compel any member of the Armed Forces, military dependent, or civilian employee of the Department of Defense to personally affirm, adopt, or adhere to the tenet that any sex, race, ethnicity, religion or national origin is inherently superior or inferior. (2) Training and instruction No organization or institution under the authority of the Secretary of Defense may provide courses, training, or any other type of instruction that directs, compels, or otherwise suggests that members of the Armed Forces, military dependents, or civilian employees of the Department of Defense should affirm, adopt, or adhere to the tenet described in paragraph (1). (3) Distinctions and classifications (A) In general No organization or institution under the authority of the Secretary of Defense shall make a distinction or classification of members of the Armed Forces, military dependents, or civilian employees of the Department of Defense based on account of race, ethnicity, or national origin. (B) Rule of construction Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to prohibit the required collection or reporting of demographic information by the Department of Defense. (d) Merit requirement All Department of Defense personnel actions, including accessions, promotions, assignments and training, shall be based exclusively on individual merit and demonstrated performance. 536. Tiger team for outreach to former members (a) Establishment of tiger team (1) In general Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a team (commonly known as a tiger team Tiger Team Public Law 116–92 10 U.S.C. 1552 (2) Tiger team leader One of the persons assigned to the Tiger Team under paragraph (1) shall be a senior-level officer or employee of the Department who shall serve as the lead official of the Tiger Team (in this section referred to as the Tiger Team Leader (3) Report on composition Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report setting forth the names of the personnel of the Department assigned to the Tiger Team pursuant to this subsection, including the positions to which assigned. The report shall specify the name of the individual assigned as Tiger Team Leader. (b) Duties (1) In general The Tiger Team shall conduct outreach to build awareness among veterans of the process established pursuant to section 527 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 for the review of discharge characterizations by appropriate discharge boards. (2) Collaboration In conducting activities under this subsection, the Tiger Team Leader shall identify appropriate external stakeholders with whom the Tiger Team shall work to carry out such activities. Such stakeholders shall include representatives of veterans service organizations and such other stakeholders as the Tiger Team Leader considers appropriate. (3) Initial report Not later than 210 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress the following: (A) A plan setting forth the following: (i) A description of the manner in which the Secretary, working through the Tiger Team and in collaboration with external stakeholders described in paragraph (2), shall identify individuals who meet the criteria in section 527(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 for review of discharge characterization. (ii) A description of the manner in which the Secretary, working through the Tiger Team and in collaboration with the external stakeholders, shall improve outreach to individuals who meet the criteria in section 527(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 for review of discharge characterization, including through— (I) obtaining contact information on such individuals; and (II) contacting such individuals on the process established pursuant to section 527 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 for the review of discharge characterizations. (B) A description of the manner in which the work described in clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (A) will be carried out, including an allocation of the work among the Tiger Team and the external stakeholders. (C) A schedule for the implementation, carrying out, and completion of the plan required under subparagraph (A). (D) A description of the additional funding, personnel, or other resources of the Department required to carry out the plan required under subparagraph (A), including any modification of applicable statutory or administrative authorities. (4) Implementation of plan (A) In general The Secretary shall implement and carry out the plan submitted under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (3) in accordance with the schedule submitted under subparagraph (C) of that paragraph. (B) Updates Not less frequently than once every 90 days after the submittal of the report under paragraph (3), the Tiger Team shall submit to Congress an update on the carrying out of the plan submitted under subparagraph (A) of that paragraph. (5) Final report Not later than 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Tiger Team shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a final report on the activities of the Tiger Team under this subsection. The report shall set forth the following: (A) The number of individuals discharged under Don't Ask, Don't Tell or a similar policy prior to the enactment of Don't Ask, Don't Tell. (B) The number of individuals described in subparagraph (A) who availed themselves of a review of discharge characterization (whether through discharge review or correction of military records) through a process established prior to the enactment of this Act. (C) The number of individuals contacted through outreach conducted pursuant to this section. (D) The number of individuals described in subparagraph (A) who availed themselves of a review of discharge characterization through the process established pursuant to section 527 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020. (E) The number of individuals described in subparagraph (D) whose review of discharge characterization resulted in a change of characterization to honorable discharge. (F) The total number of individuals described in subparagraph (A), including individuals also covered by subparagraph (E), whose review of discharge characterization since September 20, 2011 (the date of repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell), resulted in a change of characterization to honorable discharge. (6) Termination On the date that is 60 days after the date on which the final report required by paragraph (5) is submitted, the Secretary shall terminate the Tiger Team. (c) Additional reports (1) Review The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the consistency and uniformity of the reviews conducted pursuant to section 527 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020. (2) Reports Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and each year thereafter for a four-year period, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the reviews under paragraph (1). Such reports shall include any comments or recommendations for continued actions. (d) Don't ask, don't tell defined In this section, the term Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Public Law 111–321 537. Diversity, equity, and inclusion personnel grade cap (a) In general The Secretary concerned may not appoint to, or otherwise employ in, any position with sole duties as described in subsection (b) a military or civilian employee paid annual pay at a rate that exceeds the equivalent of the rate payable for GS–10, not adjusted for locality. (b) Covered duties The duties referred to in subsection (a) are as follows: (1) Developing, refining, and implementing diversity, equity, and inclusion policy. (2) Leading working groups and councils to developing diversity, equity, and inclusion goals and objectives to measure performance and outcomes. (3) Creating and implementing diversity, equity, and inclusion education, training courses, and workshops for military and civilian personnel. (c) Applicability to current employees Any military or civilian employee appointed to a position with duties described in subsection (b) who is paid annual pay at a rate that exceeds the amount allowed under subsection (a) shall be reassigned to another position not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. D Military justice and other legal matters 541. Establishment of staggered terms for members of the Military Justice Review Panel (a) Appointment to staggered terms Subsection (b) of section 946 of title 10, United States Code (article 146 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) Establishment of staggered terms Notwithstanding subsection (e), members of the Panel appointed to serve on the Panel to fill vacancies that exist due to terms of appointment expiring during the period beginning on August 1, 2030, and ending on August 31, 2030, shall be appointed to terms as follows: (A) Three members designated by the Secretary of Defense shall serve a term of two years. (B) Three members designated by the Secretary of Defense shall serve a term of four years. (C) Three members designated by the Secretary of Defense shall serve a term of six years. (D) Four members designated by the Secretary of Defense shall serve a term of eight years. . (b) Term; vacancies Subsection (e) of such section is amended to read as follows: (e) Term; vacancies (1) Term Subject to subsection (b)(4) and paragraphs (2) and (3) of this subsection, each member shall be appointed for a term of eight years, and no member may serve more than one term. (2) Vacancy Any vacancy in the Panel shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment. A member appointed to fill a vacancy in the Panel that occurs before the expiration of the term of appointment of the predecessor of such member shall be appointed for the remainder of the term of such predecessor. (3) Availability of reappointment for certain members Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a member of the Panel may be appointed to a single additional term if— (A) the appointment of the member is to fill a vacancy described in subsection (b)(4); or (B) the member was initially appointed to— (i) a term of four years or less in accordance with subsection (b)(4); or (ii) fill a vacancy that occurs before the expiration of the term of the predecessor of such member and for which the remainder of the term of such predecessor is four years or less. . 542. Technical and conforming amendments to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (a) Technical amendment relating to guilty pleas for murder Section 918 of title 10, United States Code (article 118 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended— (1) by striking he such person (2) in the matter following paragraph (4), by striking the period and inserting , unless such person is otherwise sentenced in accordance with a plea agreement entered into between the parties under section 853a (article 53a). (b) Technical amendments relating to the military justice reforms in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (1) Article 16 Subsection (c)(2)(A) of section 816 of title 10, United States Code (article 16 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking by the convening authority (2) Article 25 Section 825 of title 10, United States Code (article 25 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended— (A) in subsection (d)— (i) in paragraph (1), by striking may, after the findings are announced and before any matter is presented in the sentencing phase, request, orally on the record or in writing, sentencing by the members shall be sentenced by the military judge (ii) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows: (2) In a capital case, if the accused is convicted of an offense for which the court-martial may sentence the accused to death, the accused shall be sentenced in accordance with section 853(c) of this title (article 53(c)). ; (B) in subsection (e)— (i) in paragraph (1), by striking him the member being tried (ii) in paragraph (2)— (I) in the first sentence, by striking his opinion the opinion of the convening authority (II) in the second sentence, by striking he the member (C) in subsection (f)— (i) by striking his authority the authority of the convening authority (ii) by striking his staff judge advocate or legal officer the staff judge advocate or legal officer of the convening authority (c) Authority of special trial counsel with respect to certain offenses occurring before effective date of military justice reforms enacted in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (1) Authority Section 824a of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 531 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 (d) Special trial counsel authority over certain other offenses (1) Offenses occurring before effective date A special trial counsel may, at the sole and exclusive discretion of the special trial counsel, exercise authority over the following offenses: (A) An offense under section 917a (article 117a), 918 (article 118), section 919 (article 119), section 920 (article 120), section 920b (article 120b), section 920c (article 120c), section 928b (article 128b), or the standalone offense of child pornography punishable under section 934 (article 134) of this title that occurred on or before December 27, 2023. (B) An offense under section 925 (article 125), section 930 (article 130), or section 932 (article 132) of this title that occurred on or after January 1, 2019, and before December 28, 2023. (C) An offense under section 920a (article 120a) of this title, an offense under section 925 (article 125) of this title alleging an act of nonconsensual sodomy, or the standalone offense of kidnapping punishable under section 934 (article 134) of this title that occurred before January 1, 2019. (D) A conspiracy to commit an offense specified in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) as punishable under section 881 of this title (article 81). (E) A solicitation to commit an offense specified in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) as punishable under section 882 of this title (article 82). (F) An attempt to commit an offense specified in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), (D), or (E) as punishable under section 880 of this title (article 80). (2) Effect of exercise of authority (A) Treatment as covered offense If a special trial counsel exercises authority over an offense pursuant to paragraph (1), the offense over which the special trial counsel exercises authority shall be considered a covered offense for purposes of this chapter. (B) Known or related offenses If a special trial counsel exercises authority over an offense pursuant to paragraph (1), the special trial counsel may exercise the authority of the special trial counsel under subparagraph (B) of subsection (c)(2) with respect to other offenses described in that subparagraph without regard to the date on which the other offenses occur. . (2) Conforming amendment to effective date Section 539C(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( 10 U.S.C. 801 Public Law 117–81 and shall and, except as provided in section 824a(d) of title 10, United States Code (article 24a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), shall (d) Clarification of applicability of domestic violence and stalking to dating partners (1) Article 128b; domestic violence Section 928b of title 10, United States Code (article 128b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended— (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking Any person (a) In general.— (B) in subsection (a), as designated by paragraph (1) of this section, by inserting a dating partner, an intimate partner, (C) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (b) Definitions In this section (article), the terms dating partner immediate family intimate partner . (2) Article 130; stalking Section 930 of such title (article 130 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended— (A) in subsection (a), by striking or to his or her intimate partner to his or her intimate partner, or to his or her dating partner (B) in subsection (b)— (i) by redesignating paragraphs (3) through (5) as paragraphs (4) through (6), respectively; and (ii) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph: (3) The term dating partner (A) the length of the relationship; (B) the type of relationship; (C) the frequency of interaction between the persons involved in the relationship; and (D) the extent of physical intimacy or sexual contact between the persons involved in the relationship. . (e) Effective date The amendments made by subsection (b) and subsection (c)(1) shall take effect immediately after the coming into effect of the amendments made by part 1 of subtitle D of title V of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 10 U.S.C. 801 E Member Education, Training, Transition 551. Future servicemember preparatory course (a) Requirement If the number of nonprior service enlisted personnel covered under section 520 of title 10, United States Code, exceeds 10 percent of the total number of persons originally enlisted in an Armed Force during a fiscal year, the Secretary concerned shall establish a future servicemember preparatory course within the Armed Force concerned. (b) Purpose The course established under subsection (a) shall be designed to improve the physical and aptitude qualifications of military recruits. (c) Criteria Each course established under this section shall comply with the following requirements: (1) Enrollment All nonprior service enlisted persons whose score on the Armed Forces Qualification Test is at or above the twentieth percentile and below the thirty-first percentile must be enrolled in the course prior to attending initial basic training. (2) Graduation requirement Prior to attending initial basic training, all enlisted persons attending the course established under this section must achieve a score that exceeds the thirty-first percentile of the Armed Forces Qualification Test. (3) Effect of course failure Any enlisted person who fails to achieve course graduation requirements within 180 days of enlistment shall be separated under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned. 552. Determination of active duty service commitment for recipients of fellowships, grants, and scholarships Section 2603(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking at least three times the length of the period of the education or training. determined by the Secretary concerned. Notwithstanding sections 2004(c), 2004a(f), and 2004b(e) of this title, the service obligation required under this subsection may run concurrently with any service obligations incurred under chapter 101 of this title in accordance with regulations established by the Secretary concerned. 553. Military service academy professional sports pathway report and legislative proposal required (a) Legislative proposal Not later than March 1, 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report including the following elements: (1) A legislative proposal that would— (A) update and clarify the legislative framework related to the ability of military service academy graduates to pursue employment as a professional athlete prior to serving at least 5 years on active duty; and (B) retain the existing requirement that all military service academy graduates must serve for 2 years on active duty before affiliating with the reserves to pursue employment as a professional athlete. (2) A description of amendments to current law that would be necessary to implement the legislative proposal described under paragraph (1). (b) Report required Not later than March 1, 2024, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report that includes the following information: (1) The name, military service, and sport of each military service graduate released or deferred from active service in order to participate in professional sports. (2) A description of the sports career progress of each participant, such as drafted, signed, released, or returned to military service. (3) A summary by participant of marketing strategy and recruiting related activities conducted. (4) A description by participant of the assessments conducted by the military services to determine the recruiting value associated with approved releases from active duty. (5) The current status of each participant, including, as appropriate, affiliated franchise. 554. Community college Enlisted Training Corps demonstration program (a) Demonstration program (1) In general Not later than August 1, 2025, the Secretary concerned shall establish within each military department an Enlisted Training Corps demonstration program for the purpose of introducing students to the military, and preparing selected students for enlisted service in the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force. (2) Location Demonstration programs established under this section shall be located at a community or junior college. No program may be established at a military college or military junior college as defined for purposes of section 2107a of title 10, United States Code. (b) Eligibility for membership To be eligible for membership in a program under this section, a person must be a student at an institution where a unit of the Enlisted Training Corps is located. (c) Instructors The Secretary concerned may assign as an instructor for a unit established under this section an individual eligible to serve as an instructor under section 2111 or section 2031 of title 10, United States Code. Instructors who are not currently members on active duty shall be paid in a manner consistent with section 2031 of title 10, United States Code. (d) Financial assistance The Secretary of the military department concerned may provide financial assistance to persons enrolled in a unit of the Enlisted Training Corps in exchange for an agreement in writing that the person enlist in the active component of the military department concerned upon graduation or disenrollment from the community college. Financial assistance provided under this subsection may include tuition, living expenses, stipend, or other payment. (e) Curriculum The Secretary concerned shall ensure that any programs created under this section include as part of the curriculum the following: (1) An introduction to the benefits of military service. (2) Military history. (3) Military customs and courtesies. (4) Physical fitness requirements. (5) Instruction on ethical behavior and decisionmaking. (f) Reporting requirement Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter until the date specified by subsection (g), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the status of the demonstration program required by this section. (g) Sunset The requirements of this provision shall sunset on September 30, 2030. 555. Language training centers for members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense Section 529 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( Public Law 111–84 10 U.S.C. 2001 (1) in subsection (a), by striking may carry out a program shall carry out a program (2) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); (3) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection: (e) Contract authority The Secretary of Defense may enter into one or more contracts, cooperative agreements, or grants with private national organizations having an expertise in foreign languages, area studies, and other international fields, for the awarding of grants to accredited universities, senior military colleges, or other similar institutions of higher education to establish and maintain language training centers authorized by subsection (a). ; and (4) in subsection (f), as redesignated by paragraph (2)— (A) by striking one year after the date of the establishment of the program authorized by subsection (a) 180 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (B) by striking report on the program report on the Language Training Center program (C) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5); (D) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following new paragraph: (4) An assessment of the resources required to carry out the Language Training Center program by year through fiscal year 2027. ; and (E) in paragraph (5), as redesignated by subparagraph (C), by striking A recommendation whether the program should be continued and, if so, recommendations as to any modifications of the program Recommendations as to any modifications to the Language Training Center program 556. Limitation on availability of funds for relocation of Army CID special agent training course (a) Limitation None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2024 for the Army to relocate an Army CID special agent training course may be obligated or expended until— (1) the Secretary of the Army submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a separate report on any plans of the Secretary to relocate an Army CID special agent training course, including an explanation of the business case for any transfer of training personnel proposed as part of such plan; and (2) the Secretary provides to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a briefing on the contents of the report specified in paragraph (1). (b) Definitions In this section: (1) The term relocate (2) The term Army CID special agent training course 557. Army Physical Fitness Test (a) In general The physical fitness test of record for the United States Army in compliance with Department of Defense Instruction 1308.03, or any successor regulation, is the Army Physical Fitness Test according to the grading and evaluation scale as it existed on January 1, 2020. This test shall be the baseline test of physical fitness for members of the Army and administered at least annually, except when operational requirements or contingency operations would make such test administration impracticable. (b) Updates and modifications Notwithstanding subsection (a), the Army may update, replace, or modify the events and scoring standards in the Army Physical Fitness Test as the needs of the Army require after a robust pilot and testing period of at least 24 months. Such modifications shall not take effect until the date that is one year after the Secretary of the Army has provided a briefing on the planned changes to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives. (c) Rule of construction Nothing in this section prohibits the Army from using the Army Combat Fitness Test, or any other physical assessment the Army may develop, as a supplemental tool to assess physical fitness for all or parts of the force. Army Commanders may also require higher standards than the Army-wide grading scale for promotions, awards, schools and similar actions. Such supplemental assessment shall not constitute the baseline physical fitness assessment of record for the Army unless it is incorporated into the Army Physical Fitness Test using the procedure described in subsection (b). 558. Opt-out sharing of information on members retiring or separating from the Armed Forces with community-based organizations and related entities Section 570F of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 10 U.S.C. 1142 (1) in subsection (c)— (A) by striking out the form to indicate an email address (1) an email address; and ; and (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) if the individual would like to opt-out of the transmittal of the individual’s information to and through a State veterans agency as described in subsection (a). ; and (2) by amending subsection (d) to read as follows: (d) Opt-out of information sharing Information on an individual shall be transmitted to and through a State veterans agency as described in subsection (a) unless the individual indicates pursuant to subsection (c)(2) that the individual would like to opt out of such transmittal. . 559. Establishment of program to promote participation of foreign students in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps (a) Establishment (1) In general Not later than January 1, 2025, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a program using the authority provided under section 2103(b) of title 10, United States Code, to promote the participation of foreign students in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps (in this section referred to as the Program (2) Organization The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency, the Secretaries of the military departments, the commanders of the combatant commands, the participant institutions in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps program, and any other individual the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate, shall be responsible for, and shall oversee, the Program. (b) Objective The objective of the Program is to promote the readiness and interoperability of the United States Armed Forces and the military forces of partner countries by providing a high-quality, cost effective military-based educational experience for foreign students in furtherance of the military-to-military program objectives of the Department of Defense and to enhance the educational experience and preparation of future United States military leaders through increased, extended interaction with highly qualified potential foreign military leaders. (c) Activities (1) In general Under the Program, the Secretary of Defense shall— (A) identify to the military services’ Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps program the foreign students who, based on criteria established by the Secretary, the Secretary recommends be considered for admission under the Program; (B) coordinate with partner countries to evaluate interest in and promote awareness of the Program; (C) establish a mechanism for tracking an alumni network of foreign students who participate in the Program; and (D) to the extent practicable, work with the participant institutions in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps program and partner countries to identify academic institutions and programs that— (i) have specialized academic programs in areas of study of interest to participating countries; or (ii) have high participation from or significant diaspora populations from participating countries. (d) Strategy (1) In general Not later than September 30, 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a strategy for the implementation of the Program. (2) Elements The strategy required by paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: (A) A governance structure for the Program, including— (i) the officials tasked to oversee the Program; (ii) the format of the governing body of the Program; (iii) the functions and duties of such governing body with respect to establishing and maintaining the Program; and (iv) mechanisms for coordinating with partner countries whose students are selected to participate in the Program. (B) A list of additional authorities, appropriations, or other congressional support necessary to ensure the success of the Program. (C) A description of targeted partner countries and participant institutions in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps for the first three fiscal years of the Program, including a rationale for selecting such initial partners. (D) A description of opportunities and potential timelines for future Program expansion, as appropriate. (E) A description of the mechanism for tracking the alumni network of participants of the Program. (F) Any other information the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate. (e) Report (1) In general Not later than September 20, 2025, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees (as defined in section 101 of title 10, United States Code) a report on the Program. (2) Elements Each report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: (A) A narrative summary of activities conducted as part of the Program during the preceding fiscal year. (B) An overview of participant Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps programs, individuals, and countries, to include a description of the areas of study entered into by the students participating in the Program. (C) A description of opportunities and potential timelines for future Program expansion, as appropriate. (D) Any other information the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate. (f) Limitation on authority The Secretary of Defense may not use the authority provided under this section to pay for tuition or room and board for foreign students who participate in the Program. (g) Termination The Program shall terminate on December 31, 2029. 560. Consideration of standardized test scores in military service academy application process The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the United States Military Academy, the United States Naval Academy, and the United States Air Force Academy require the submission and consideration of standardized test scores as part of the their application processes. F Military Family Readiness and Dependents' Education 561. Pilot program on recruitment and retention of employees for child development programs (a) In general The Secretary of Defense may develop and implement a pilot program to assess the effectiveness of increasing compensation for employees of child development programs on military installations in improving the ability of such programs to recruit and retain such employees. (b) Compensation If the Secretary implements the pilot program authorized by subsection (a), the Secretary shall provide for the payment of compensation to employees of child development programs under the pilot program at a fair and competitive wage in keeping with market conditions. (c) Selection of locations (1) In general If the Secretary implements the pilot program authorized by subsection (a), the Secretary shall select not fewer than five military installations for purposes of carrying out the pilot program. (2) Considerations In selecting military installations under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consider military installations with child development programs— (A) with a shortage of qualified employees; or (B) subject to other conditions identified by the Secretary that affect the ability of the programs to operate at full capacity. (d) Regulations The Secretary may prescribe such regulations as are necessary to carry out this section. (e) Duration of pilot program If the Secretary implements the pilot program authorized by subsection (a), the pilot program shall— (1) commence on the date on which the Secretary prescribes regulations under subsection (d); and (2) terminate on the date that is 3 years after the date described in paragraph (1). (f) Briefings required (1) Initial briefing If the Secretary implements the pilot program authorized by subsection (a), the Secretary shall, when the pilot program commences in accordance with subsection (e)(1), brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on— (A) the military installations selected under subsection (c) for purposes of carrying out the pilot program; and (B) the data that informed those selections. (2) Final briefing If the Secretary implements the pilot program authorized by subsection (a), the Secretary shall, not later than 180 days before the pilot program terminates in accordance with subsection (e)(2), brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the outcomes and findings of the pilot program, including— (A) data collected and analyses conducted under the pilot program with respect to the relationship between increased compensation for employees of child development programs and improved recruitment or retention of those employees; and (B) any recommendations with respect to increases in compensation for employees of child development programs across the Department of Defense as a result of the pilot program. (g) Child development program defined In this section, the term child development program 562. Certain assistance to local educational agencies that benefit dependents of military and civilian personnel (a) Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees (1) Assistance to schools with significant numbers of military dependent students Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2024 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $50,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 ( Public Law 109–163 20 U.S.C. 7703b (2) Local educational agency defined In this subsection, the term local educational agency 20 U.S.C. 7713(9) (b) Impact aid for children with severe disabilities (1) In general Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2024 pursuant to section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $10,000,000 shall be available for payments under section 363 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398 20 U.S.C. 7703a (2) Additional amount Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2024 pursuant to section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $20,000,000 shall be available for use by the Secretary of Defense to make payments to local educational agencies determined by the Secretary to have higher concentrations of military children with severe disabilities. (3) Report Not later than March 31, 2024, the Secretary shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the Department’s evaluation of each local educational agency with higher concentrations of military children with severe disabilities and subsequent determination of the amounts of impact aid each such agency shall receive. 563. Modifications to assistance to local educational agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces with enrollment changes due to base closures, force structure changes, or force relocations (a) In general Section 575 of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( 20 U.S.C. 7703d (1) in subsection (a)— (A) by striking year, the local educational agency (as determined year, the local educational agency had (as determined (B) by striking paragraph (2); (C) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively, and by moving such paragraphs, as so redesignated, two ems to the left; and (D) in paragraph (2), as redesignated by subparagraph (C), by striking ; or (2) in subsection (f)— (A) by striking The Secretary of Defense (1) In general The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of the Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation, ; and (B) by adding at the end the following: (2) Method of disbursement The Director shall make disbursements under paragraph (1) using existing authorities of the Office. ; (3) by striking subsection (h); and (4) by redesignating subsections (i) and (j) as subsections (h) and (i), respectively. (b) Briefing required Not later than March 1, 2024, the Director of the Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation shall brief the Committees of the Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on— (1) any additional authorities that would be helpful to the Office in its efforts to better support local educational agencies; and (2) any actions taken to implement the recommendations outlined in the March 2008 report entitled Update to the Report on Assistance to Local Educational Agencies for Defense Dependents Education Public Law 109–364 564. Assistance for military spouses to obtain doula certifications Section 1784a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (f) Doula certifications In carrying out the programs authorized by subsection (a), the Secretary shall provide assistance to the spouse of a member of the armed forces described in subsection (b) in obtaining a doula certification provided by an organization that receives reimbursement under the extramedical maternal health providers demonstration project required by section 746 of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 ( Public Law 116–283 10 U.S.C. 1073 . G Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps 571. Expansion of Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps Section 2031 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(1)— (A) by striking The President shall promulgate The Secretary of Defense shall promulgate (B) by striking maintained, and shall provide maintained. (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (g) (1) The Secretary of Defense shall establish and support not less than 3,400, and not more than 4,000, units of the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps. (2) The requirement under paragraph (1) shall not apply— (A) if the Secretary fails to receive an adequate number of requests for Junior Reserve Officer’s Training Corps units by public and private secondary educational institutions; and (B) during a time of national emergency when the Secretaries of the military departments determine that funding must be allocated elsewhere. . 572. JROTC program certification Section 2031 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (i) (1) The Secretary of Defense may suspend or place on probation a Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps unit that fails to comply with provisions of the standardized memorandum of understanding required pursuant to subsection (b). (2) Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this subsection, and annually thereafter for four years, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report including information on units suspended or placed on probation pursuant to this subsection and a justification for the reinstatement of any such unit. (3) A unit may be placed on probation for a period of up to three years for failing to comply with the provisions of the standardized memorandum of understanding or any other requirement in this section. A unit may be suspended if, after the three-year probationary period, such unit remains out of compliance with the requirements of this section, and the Secretary of the military department concerned determines that such suspension is necessary to mitigate program deficiencies or to protect the safety of program participants. . 573. Memorandum of understanding required Section 2031(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (5) as subparagraphs (A) through (E); (2) by inserting (1) (b) (3) in subparagraph (A), as redesignated by paragraph (1)— (A) by striking (A) (i) (B) by striking (B) (ii) (4) by amending subparagraph (E), as so redesignated, to read as follows: the unit meets such other requirements as the Secretary of the military department concerned proscribes in the memorandum of understanding required under this subsection. (5) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) The Secretary of Defense shall issue regulations establishing a standardized memorandum of understanding to be signed by the Secretary of the military department concerned and each institution operating a unit under this section. The memorandum shall address the following matters: (A) A requirement for institutions to notify the appropriate armed force of allegations of misconduct against an instructor receiving retired or other pay from such armed force, including procedures that would require such institutions to report allegations of sexual misconduct, including harassment, against an instructor, within 48 hours of learning of such allegations; (B) Processes by which the military departments certify instructors, including the conduct of appropriate background checks by the military service and the institution concerned. (C) Processes by which the military service will conduct oversight of their certified instructors, including the requirement to recertify instructors not less often than once every five years. (D) Processes by which such institution’s program will be inspected by the military department concerned prior to establishment of a new unit, or not less often than once every four years in the case of units existing as of January 1, 2024, staggered as the Secretary determines appropriate. (E) A requirement that each institution certifies it— (i) has created a process for students to report violations of their rights under title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 ( 20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq. 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq. (ii) has implemented policies ensuring students and instructors are notified of those rights, as well as the process for reporting violations of those rights, including information on available mandatory reporters, if such laws apply to the institution; (iii) has implemented annual training to inform students of methods to prevent, respond to, and report sexual assault and harassment; (iv) agrees to report all allegations of violations described under this subparagraph to the military department concerned and, if subject to the jurisdiction of the Department of Education, the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights not less often than annually; (v) has developed processes to ensure that each student enrolled in a unit under this section has done so voluntarily; and (vi) agrees to provide the data necessary to compile the report required under subsection (j). . 574. Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps instructor compensation Section 2031 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by amending subsection (d) to read as follows: (d) (1) Instead of, or in addition to, detailing officers and noncommissioned officers on active duty under subsection (c)(1), the Secretary of the military department concerned may authorize qualified institutions to employ, as administrators and instructors in the program— (A) retired officers and noncommissioned officers whose qualifications are approved by the Secretary and the institution concerned and who request such employment; (B) officers and noncommissioned officers who are separated with an honorable discharge within the past 5 years with at least 8 years of service and are approved by the Secretary and the institution concerned and who request such employment; or (C) officers and noncommissioned officers who are active participating members of the selected reserve at the time of application, for purposes of section 101(d) of this title, and have not yet reached retirement eligibility and are approved by the Secretary and the institution concerned and who request such employment. (2) Employment under this subsection shall be subject to the following conditions: (A) The Secretary concerned shall pay to the institution an amount equal to one-half of the Department’s prescribed JROTC Standardized Instructor Pay Scale (JSIPS) amount paid to the member by the institution for any period. (B) The Secretary concerned may pay to the institution more than one-half of the amount paid to the member by the institution if (as determined by the Secretary)— (i) the institution is in an educationally and economically deprived area; and (ii) the Secretary determines that such action is in the national interest. (C) Payments by the Secretary concerned under this subsection shall be made from funds appropriated for that purpose. (D) The Secretary concerned may require successful applicants to transfer to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR). ; (2) by striking subsections (e) and (f); and (3) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as subsections (e) and (f), respectively. 575. Annual report on allegations of sexual misconduct in JROTC programs Section 2031 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 572 of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (j) (1) Not later than March 31, 2024, and annually thereafter through March 31, 2029, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on allegations of sexual misconduct, sexual harassment, and sex discrimination in JROTC programs during the preceding year. (2) Each report required under paragraph (1) shall set forth the following: (A) The number of reported allegations of violations under title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 ( 20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq. (i) the number of such reported allegations that were investigated; (ii) the outcome of those investigations; and (iii) the number of such reported allegations by State, the District of Columbia, or overseas location where these reports occurred. (B) The number of reports that the Department of Defense or military services have received during the reporting period involving allegations of acts of violence, including sexual abuse or harassment, by instructors against students in the JROTC program, including— (i) the offense involved; (ii) the military service involved; (iii) the number of instructors and number of allegations they each received; (iv) the number of reports of sexual misconduct and harassment that have been investigated; (v) the number of reports or investigations that have led to the removal of instructors from JROTC programs; and (vi) the number of such reported allegations by State, the District of Columbia, or overseas location where these reports occurred. (C) Any steps the Department of Defense has taken to mitigate sexual misconduct and harassment in JROTC programs during the preceding year. (3) Each report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form and may not be marked as controlled unclassified information. (4) The Secretary shall annually report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives regarding compliance with this subsection by the JROTC program, including an up-to-date report on the Secretary’s monitoring of such compliance. (5) The Secretary may seek the advice and counsel of the Attorney General and the Secretary of Health and Human Services concerning the development and dissemination to the JROTC program of best practices information about preventing and responding to incidents of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking, including elements of institutional policies that have proven successful based on evidence-based outcome measurements. (6) No officer, employee, or agent of an institution participating in any program under this chapter shall retaliate, intimidate, threaten, coerce, or otherwise discriminate against any individual for exercising their rights or responsibilities under any provision of this subsection. . 576. Comptroller General report on efforts to increase transparency and reporting on sexual violence in the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps Program (a) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on efforts to increase transparency and reporting on sexual violence in the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps Program. (b) Elements The report required under subsection (a) shall include a description of the following: (1) The implementation of section 2031 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by sections 572, 573, and 575 of this Act. (2) The adequacy of the Department of Defense’s vetting process for Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps instructors. (3) The Department of Defense and the Department of Education’s oversight of compliance of units with respect to title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 ( 20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq. 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq. (4) Any changes in the numbers of sexual harassment, assault, or stalking incidents reported to institutions or law enforcement agencies. (5) The sufficiency of military department unit inspections. (c) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees H Decorations and other awards, miscellaneous reports and other matters 581. Extension of deadline for review of World War I valor medals Section 584(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 10 U.S.C. 7271 six years after the date of the enactment of this Act December 31, 2028 582. Prohibition on former members of the Armed Forces accepting post-service employment with certain foreign governments (a) In general Chapter 49 989. Prohibition on former members of the armed forces accepting post-service employment with certain foreign governments (a) In general Except as provided by subsection (b), a covered individual may not occupy a covered post-service position. (b) Temporary waiver (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall establish a process under which a covered individual may be granted a temporary waiver of the prohibition under subsection (a) if— (A) the individual, or a Federal agency on behalf of, and with the consent of, the individual, submits to the Secretary a written application for a waiver in such form and manner as the Secretary determines appropriate; and (B) the Secretary determines that the waiver is necessary to advance the national security interests of the United States. (2) Period of waiver A waiver issued under paragraph (1) shall apply for a period not exceeding 5 years. The Secretary may renew such a waiver. (3) Revocation The Secretary may revoke a waiver issued under paragraph (1) to a covered individual with respect to a covered-post service position if the Secretary determines that the employment of the individual in the covered-post service position poses a threat to national security. (4) Notification (A) In general Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary issues a waiver under paragraph (1) or revokes a waiver under paragraph (3), the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives written notification of the waiver or revocation, as the case may be. (B) Elements A notification required by subparagraph (A) shall include the following: (i) With respect to a waiver issued to a covered individual— (I) the details of the application, including the position held by the individual in the armed forces; (II) the nature of the post-service position of the individual; (III) a description of the national security interests that will be advanced by reason of issuing such a waiver; and (IV) the specific reasons why the Secretary determines that issuing the waiver will advance such interests. (ii) With respect to a revocation of a waiver issued to a covered individual— (I) the details of the waiver, including any renewals of the waiver, and the dates of such waiver and renewals; and (II) the specific reasons why the Secretary determined that the revocation is warranted. (c) Certification of prohibition In implementing the prohibition under subsection (a), the Secretary shall establish a process under which each member of the armed forces is, before the member retires or is otherwise separated from the armed forces— (1) informed in writing of the prohibition, and the penalties for violations of the prohibition; and (2) is required to certify that the member understands the prohibition and those penalties. (d) Penalties In the case of a covered individual who knowingly and willfully fails to comply with the prohibition under subsection (a), the Secretary shall, as applicable— (1) withhold any pay, allowances, or benefits that would otherwise be provided to the individual by the Department of Defense; and (2) revoke any security clearance of the individual. (e) Annual reports (1) Requirement Not later than March 31, 2024, and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on covered post-service employment occurring during the year covered by the report. (2) Elements Each report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) The number of former covered individuals who occupy a covered post-service position, broken down by— (i) the name of the employer; (ii) the foreign government, including by the specific foreign individual, agency, or entity, for whom the covered post-service employment is being performed; and (iii) the nature of the services provided as part of the covered post-service employment. (B) An assessment by the Secretary of whether— (i) the Department of Defense maintains adequate systems and processes for ensuring that former members of the armed forces are submitting required reports relating to their employment by foreign governments; (ii) all covered individuals who occupy a covered post-service position are in compliance with this section; (iii) the services provided by the covered individuals who occupy a covered post-service position pose a current or future threat to the national security of the United States; and (iv) there is any credible information or reporting that any covered individual who occupies a covered post-service position has engaged in activities that violate Federal law. (3) Form of report Each report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (f) Notifications of determinations of certain threats (1) Requirement In addition to the annual reports under subsection (d), if the Secretary determines that the services provided by a covered individual who occupies a covered post-service position pose a threat described in clause (iii) of paragraph (2)(B) of that subsection, or include activities described in clause (iv) of such paragraph, the Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees of that determination by not later than 30 days after making the determination. (2) Elements A notification required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) The name of the covered individual. (B) The name of the employer. (C) The foreign government, including the specific foreign individual, agency, or entity, for whom the covered post-service employment is being performed. (D) As applicable, a description of the risk to national security and the activities that may violate Federal law. (g) Rule of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to indemnify or shield covered individuals from prosecution under any relevant provision of title 18. (h) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered individual The term covered individual (2) Covered post-service employment The term covered post-service employment (A) the government of— (i) a country of concern (as defined in section 1(m) of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 ( 22 U.S.C. 2651a(m) (ii) a country the Secretary of Defense determines acts as a proxy or passthrough for services for a country of concern; or (B) any company, entity, or other person the activities of which are directly or indirectly supervised, directed, controlled, financed, or subsidized, in whole or in major part, by a government described in subparagraph (A). (3) Covered post-service position The term covered post-service position . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 49 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 989. Prohibition on former members of the armed forces accepting post-service employment with certain foreign governments. . (c) Conforming amendment Section 908 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (f) Prohibition on former members of armed forces accepting employment with certain foreign governments For a provision of law prohibiting former members of the armed forces from accepting post-service employment with certain foreign governments, see section 989 of title 10. . 583. Prohibition on requiring listing of gender or pronouns in official correspondence The Department of Defense is prohibited from requiring members of the Armed Forces or civilian employees of the Department of Defense to list their gender or pronouns in official correspondence, whether such correspondence is written or electronic. I Enhanced recruiting efforts 591. Short title This subtitle may be cited as the Military Service Promotion Act of 2023 592. Increased access to potential recruits at secondary schools Section 503(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) in subparagraph (A)— (i) in clause (i), by striking ; and (ii) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii); (iii) by inserting after clause (i) the following new clause: (ii) shall provide to military recruiters access to career fairs or similar events upon a request made by military recruiters for military recruiting purposes; and ; and (iv) in clause (iii), as redesignated by subparagraph (B), by inserting , not later than 60 days after receiving such request, provide (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking subparagraph (A)(ii) subparagraph (A)(iii) (2) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7); and (3) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new paragraph: (6) The Secretary of Defense shall submit an annual report to Congress not later than February 1 each calendar year, detailing each notification of denial of recruiting access issued under paragraph (3). . 593. Increased access to potential recruits at institutions of higher education Section 983(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ; or (2) in paragraph (2)— (A) by striking to the following information pertaining , with respect (B) by striking institution): institution)— (C) in subparagraph (A)— (i) by striking Names names (ii) by striking telephone listings. telephone listings, which information shall be made available not later than the 60th day following the date of a request; and (D) in subparagraph (B), by striking Date date VI COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS A Pay and Allowances 601. Pay of members of reserve components for inactive-duty training to obtain or maintain an aeronautical rating or designation (a) In general Chapter 3 section 206 206a. Pay of members of reserve components for inactive-duty training to obtain or maintain an aeronautical rating or designation Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned, a member of the National Guard or a member of a reserve component of a uniformed service who is receiving aviation incentive pay under section 334(a) of this title and is entitled to compensation under section 206 of this title is entitled to such compensation for a number of periods of inactive-duty training each month sufficient for the member to obtain or maintain an aeronautical rating or designation. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 206 the following new item: 206a. Pay of members of reserve components for inactive-duty training to obtain or maintain an aeronautical rating or designation. . 602. Modification of calculation method for basic allowance for housing to more accurately assess housing costs of junior members of uniformed services Section 403(b)(5) of title 37, United States Code, is amended, in the second sentence, by striking and shall be based on the following: determined in subparagraph (A) 603. Basic allowance for housing for members assigned to vessels undergoing maintenance Section 403(f)(2) of title 37, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking subparagraphs (B) and (C) subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D) (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (D) (i) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned, the Secretary may authorize the payment of a basic allowance for housing to a member of a uniformed service without dependents who is serving in a pay grade below E–6 and has orders to a naval vessel during a shipyard availability or maintenance period. (ii) In prescribing regulations under clause (i), the Secretary concerned shall consider the availability of quarters for members serving in pay grades below E–6 before authorizing the payment of a basic allowance for housing for such members. . 604. Dual basic allowance for housing for training for certain members of reserve components Section 403(g)(3) of title 37, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking Paragraphs (A) Except as provided by subparagraph (B), paragraphs (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (B) Paragraphs (1) and (2) shall apply with respect to a member of a reserve component without dependents who is called or ordered to active duty to attend training for a period of 140 days or more but fewer than 365 days and for whom transportation of household goods is authorized under section 453(c) of this title as part of the call or order to active duty. . 605. Modification of calculation of gross household income for basic needs allowance to address areas of demonstrated need (a) In general Section 402b(k)(1)(B) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by inserting or that otherwise has a demonstrated need high cost of living (b) Implementation guidance The Secretary of Defense shall revise the guidance issued with respect to implementation of the basic needs allowance under section 402b of title 37, United States Code, to reflect the amendment made by subsection (a). 606. Expansion of eligibility for reimbursement of qualified licensure, certification, and business relocation costs incurred by military spouses Section 453(g)(1) of title 37, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A)— (A) by striking member is reassigned (i) reassigned ; (B) by striking ; and ; or (C) by adding at the end the following new clause: (ii) transferred from a regular component of a uniformed service into the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve of a uniformed service, if the member is authorized a final move from the last duty station to the new jurisdiction or geographic area; and ; and (2) in subparagraph (B), by inserting or transfer reassignment 607. Cost-of-living allowance in the continental United States: high cost areas Section 403b(c) of title 37, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the second sentence, by striking 8 percent 5 percent (2) in the third sentence, by striking shall prescribe may prescribe 608. OCONUS cost-of-living allowance: adjustments Section 617 of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 (1) in the section heading, by striking ; notice to certain congressional committees (2) by striking subsections (a), (b), and (c) and inserting the following: (a) In general Subject to subsections (b) and (c), the Secretary of Defense may announce reductions in the cost-of-living allowance for a member of the uniformed services assigned to a duty station located outside the continental United States— (1) not more than two times per year; or (2) in connection with a permanent change of station for such member. (b) Limitation on size of reductions The Secretary may not make a reduction under subsection (a) in the allowance described in that subsection by an amount that exceeds 10 percent of the amount of the allowance before the reduction. (c) Treatment of reductions relating to foreign currency exchange rates The limitations under subsections (a) and (b) shall not apply to reductions in the allowance described in subsection (a) relating to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. (d) Implementation of reductions The Secretary may phase in the reductions described in subsection (a). (e) Increases The Secretary may increase the allowance described in subsection (a) for a member of the uniformed services at any time. . 609. Extension of one-time uniform allowance for officers who transfer to the Space Force Section 606(d)(1) of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 ( Public Law 116–283 37 U.S.C. 416 September 30, 2023 September 30, 2025 610. Review of rates of military basic pay (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the rates of monthly basic pay authorized for members of the uniformed services to determine if the current basic pay table adequately compensates junior enlisted personnel in pay grades E–1 through E–4. (b) Factors for review In conducting the review required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall conduct the following: (1) An assessment of the adequacy of the rates of monthly basic pay for members of the uniformed services in light of current and predicted recruiting difficulties. (2) An analysis of how such basic pay, when combined with other elements of regular compensation for members of the uniformed services, compares with private sector wages for potential recruits to the uniformed services. (3) An assessment of how sustained periods of cost inflation affect pay for the uniformed services and comparable private sector wages. (4) An historical analysis of how percentage differences between junior enlisted basic pay, senior enlisted basic pay, junior officer basic pay, and senior officer basic pay, have changed since the rates of basic pay for members of the uniformed services were authorized by section 601 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 ( Public Law 109–364 37 U.S.C. 1009 (c) Report and legislative proposal required Not later than March 1, 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives— (1) a report on the results of the review required by subsection (a); and (2) a comprehensive legislative proposal for the rates of basic pay for members of the uniformed services. 611. Government Accountability Office study on process for determining cost-of-living allowances for members of the uniformed services assigned to the continental United States, Hawaii, Alaska, and overseas locations (a) In general The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on the process for determining cost-of-living allowances for members of the uniformed services stationed in the continental United States, Hawaii, Alaska, and at overseas locations. (b) Elements In conducting the study required by subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall assess— (1) the fairness and equity of the process for determining cost-of-living allowances described in subsection (a) and methods for improving that process; (2) the advantages and disadvantages of averaging the results of continental United States Living Pattern Surveys and Retail Price Schedules without regard to the geographic concentration of members of the uniformed services within the continental United States when determining the baseline cost of living for the continental United States; (3) if additional out-of-pocket expenses, including the costs for a member of the uniformed services to travel to and from the home of record of the member from the assigned duty station of the member, should be included in the calculations of the Department of Defense for determining overseas cost-of-living allowances to better equalize the true costs of living for members stationed outside the continental United States with such costs for members stationed inside the continental United States; and (4) the process by which the Department of Defense conducts Living Pattern Surveys and develops Retail Price Schedules. (c) Report required Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report— (1) setting forth the results of the study required by subsection (a); and (2) making any recommendations the Comptroller General considers appropriate based on those results, including any recommendations for changes to section 403b or 405 of title 37, United States Code. B Bonus and Incentive Pays 621. Modification of special and incentive pay authorities for members of reserve components (a) In general Section 357 of title 37, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking incentive pay special or incentive pay (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting the following: “if the Secretary concerned is paying the member of the reserve component the special or incentive pay for the purpose of— (1) maintaining a skill certification or proficiency identical to a skill certification or proficiency required of the member in the regular component; or (2) compensating the member of the reserve component for exposure to hazards or risks identical to hazards or risks to which the member in the regular component was exposed. . (b) Conforming and clerical amendments (1) Conforming amendment The section heading for section 357 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking Incentive Special and incentive (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections for chapter 5 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 357 and inserting the following new item: 357. Special and incentive pay authorities for members of the reserve components of the armed forces. . (c) Modification of implementation determination Section 602(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 37 U.S.C. 357 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively, and by moving such subparagraphs, as so redesignated, two ems to the right; (2) by striking The Secretary may (1) In general The Secretary shall ; (3) in subparagraph (A), as redesignated by paragraph (1), by striking subsection (b) subsection (c) (4) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) Evaluation of types of special and incentive pay In making the determination and certification described in paragraph (1)(B), the Secretary shall evaluate each type or category of special and incentive pay separately and may make the determination and certification based on the effect on an Armed Force concerned of a particular type or category of special or incentive pay. . 622. Expansion of continuation pay eligibility (a) Continuation pay: full TSP members with 8 to 12 years of service Section 356 of title 37, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the section heading, by striking 8 7 (2) in subsections (a)(1) and (d), by striking 8 7 (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 5 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 356 and inserting the following new item: 356. Continuation pay: full TSP members with 7 to 12 years of service. . 623. One-year extension of certain expiring bonus and special pay authorities (a) Authorities relating to reserve forces Section 910(g) of title 37, United States Code, relating to income replacement payments for reserve component members experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service, is amended by striking December 31, 2023 December 31, 2024 (b) Title 10 authorities relating to health care professionals The following sections of title 10, United States Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2023 December 31, 2024 (1) Section 2130a(a)(1), relating to nurse officer candidate accession program. (2) Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education loans for certain health professionals who serve in the Selected Reserve. (c) Authorities relating to nuclear officers Section 333(i) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking December 31, 2023 December 31, 2024 (d) Authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2023 December 31, 2024 (1) Section 331(h), relating to general bonus authority for enlisted members. (2) Section 332(g), relating to general bonus authority for officers. (3) Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive pay and bonus authorities for officers. (4) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for officers in health professions. (5) Section 336(g), relating to contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps. (6) Section 351(h), relating to hazardous duty pay. (7) Section 352(g), relating to assignment pay or special duty pay. (8) Section 353(i), relating to skill incentive pay or proficiency bonus. (9) Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to high priority units. (e) Authorities to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing Section 403(b) of title 37, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (7)(E), relating to temporary increases in rates of basic allowance for areas covered by a major disaster declaration or containing an installation experiencing a sudden influx of military personnel, by striking December 31, 2023 December 31, 2024 (2) in paragraph (8)(C), relating to temporary adjustments in rates of basic allowance for housing for localities where actual housing costs differ from current rates of basic allowance for housing by more than 20 percent, by striking September 30, 2023 December 31, 2024 624. Requirement to establish remote and austere condition assignment incentive pay program for Air Force The Secretary of the Air Force shall— (1) evaluate the Remote and Austere Condition Assignment Incentive Pay program of the Army; and (2) not later than October 1, 2025, establish a similar program for the Air Force, unless the Secretary can certify to Congress that there are no critically manned units at any Air Force installation in Alaska. C Other Matters 631. Modification of requirements for approval of foreign employment by retired and reserve members of uniformed services Section 908 of title 37, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (b)— (A) by striking A person (1) A person (B) by inserting after determining that such approval is not contrary to the national interests of the United States approve the employment (C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) The Secretary of a military department may delegate the determination of the Secretary required by paragraph (1) only to an official of the military department at or above the level of an Assistant Secretary or, in the event of a vacancy in the position of such an official, a civilian official performing the duties of that position. ; and (2) in subsection (d)— (A) in paragraph (2)— (i) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking an officer a person (ii) by striking subparagraphs (B) and (C) and inserting the following new subparagraphs: (B) A description of the duties, if any, the person is to perform and the compensation the person is to receive for such duties, as reflected in the person’s application for approval of the employment or compensation or payment or award. (C) The position the person held or holds in the armed forces, including the rank of the person and the armed force in which the person served. (D) Any other information the Secretaries of the military departments consider relevant, except that such information may not include the person’s date of birth, Social Security number, home address, phone number, or any other personal identifier other than the name and rank of the person and the armed force in which the person served. ; and (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) Not later than 60 days after the date on which a report required by paragraph (1) is submitted, the Secretaries of the military departments shall make the report, and all contents of the report, available on a publicly accessible internet website. . 632. Restrictions on retired and reserve members of the Armed Forces receiving employment and compensation indirectly from foreign governments through private entities Section 908(a) of title 37, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), respectively, and by moving such subparagraphs, as so redesignated, 2 ems to the right; (2) by striking Subject to (1) In general Subject to ; (3) in subparagraph (C), as redesignated, by striking Commissioned Reserve Corps Ready Reserve Corps (4) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) Application to private entities (A) In general The acceptance by a person described in subparagraph (B) of employment (and compensation related to that employment) or payments or awards for work performed for a foreign government through a private entity shall be subject to the provisions of this section to the same extent and in the same manner as such provisions apply to employment (and compensation related to that employment) and payments and awards described in paragraph (1). (B) Persons described A person described in this subparagraph is— (i) a retired member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force; or (ii) a member of a reserve component of an armed force specified in clause (i), except a member serving on active duty under a call or order to active duty for a period in excess of 30 days. . VII Health Care Provisions A TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits 701. Extension of period of eligibility for health benefits under TRICARE Reserve Select for survivors of a member of the Selected Reserve (a) In general Section 1076d(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking six months three years (b) Effective date The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on October 1, 2025. 702. Authority to provide dental care for dependents located at certain remote or isolated locations Section 1077(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking paragraph (2) paragraphs (2) and (3) (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) (A) Dependents who reside within a specified geographic area and are covered by a dental plan established under section 1076a may receive dental care in a dental treatment facility of the uniformed services on a space available basis if the Secretary of Defense determines that— (i) civilian dental care within the specified geographic area is inadequate or is not sufficiently available; and (ii) adequate resources exist to provide space available dental care to the dependents at the facility. (B) Care under subparagraph (A) shall be provided on a reimbursable basis. . 703. Inclusion of assisted reproductive technology and artificial insemination as required primary and preventive health care services for members of the uniformed services and dependents (a) Members of the uniformed services Section 1074d of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(2)— (A) by striking entitled to preventive (A) preventive ; (B) in subparagraph (A), as designated by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and (C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (B) for male members of the uniformed services (excluding former members of the uniformed services), services relating to infertility described in subsection (b)(4). ; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (c) Infertility services included for members of the uniformed services Services relating to infertility required to be provided under subsections (a)(2)(B) and (b)(4) for members of the uniformed services (excluding former members of the uniformed services) shall include the following: (1) Treatments or procedures using assisted reproductive technology (as defined in section 8 of the Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992 ( 42 U.S.C. 263a–7(1) (2) The provision of artificial insemination, including intrauterine insemination, without regard to coital conception. . (b) Dependents Section 1077(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (19) Services relating to infertility, including the services specified in section 1074d(c) of this title, except that the services specified in such section may be provided only to a dependent of a member of the uniformed services (excluding any dependent of a former member of the uniformed services). . (c) Exclusion from contracts for former members and their dependents Section 1086 of such title is amended— (1) in subsection (c), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking subsection (d) subsections (d) and (j) (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (j) A plan contracted for under subsection (a) may not include coverage for services under section 1077(a)(19) of this title for former members of the uniformed services or dependents of former members of the uniformed services. . (d) Application The amendments made by this section shall apply to services provided on or after January 1, 2025. (e) Rule of construction Nothing in this section or the amendments made by this section shall be construed provide new benefits to or alter existing benefits for former members of the uniformed services or the dependents of former members of the uniformed services. 704. Program on treatment of members of the Armed Forces for post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injuries, and co-occurring disorders related to military sexual trauma (a) Establishment of program (1) In general Chapter 55 section 1074o 1074p. Program on treatment of members of the armed forces for post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injuries, and co-occurring disorders related to military sexual trauma (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a program to provide intensive outpatient programs to treat members of the Armed Forces suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injuries, and co-occurring disorders related to military sexual trauma, including treatment for substance abuse, depression, and other issues related to such conditions. (b) Discharge through partnerships The Secretary shall carry out the program under subsection (a) through partnerships with public, private, and non-profit health care organizations, universities, and institutions that— (1) provide health care to members of the armed forces; (2) provide evidence-based treatment for psychological and neurological conditions that are common among members of the armed forces, including post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, substance abuse, and depression; (3) provide health care, support, and other benefits to family members of members of the armed forces; and (4) provide health care under the TRICARE program. (c) Program activities Each organization, university, or institution that participates in a partnership under the program under subsection (a) shall— (1) carry out intensive outpatient programs of short duration to treat members of the armed forces suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injuries, and co-occurring disorders related to military sexual trauma, including treatment for substance abuse, depression, and other issues related to such conditions; (2) use evidence-based and evidence-informed treatment strategies in carrying out such programs; (3) share clinical and outreach best practices with other organizations, universities, and institutions participating in the program under subsection (a); and (4) annually assess outcomes for members of the armed forces individually and among the organizations, universities, and institutions participating in the program under subsection (a) with respect to the treatment of conditions described in paragraph (1). . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1074o the following new item: 1074p. Program on treatment of members of the armed forces for post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injuries, and co-occurring disorders related to military sexual trauma. . (b) Reports (1) Initial report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the program under section 1074p of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), which shall include a description of the program and such other matters on the program as the Secretary considers appropriate. (2) Additional report Not later than two years after commencement of implementation of the program under section 1074p of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the program, which shall include the following: (A) A description of the program, including the partnerships under the program as described in subsection (b) of such section, as so added. (B) An assessment of the effectiveness of the program and the activities under the program. (C) Such recommendations for legislative or administrative action as the Secretary considers appropriate in light of the program. (c) Conforming repeal (1) In general Section 702 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 10 U.S.C. 1092 (2) Clerical amendment The table of contents at the beginning of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 705. Waiver of cost-sharing for three mental health outpatient visits for certain beneficiaries under the TRICARE program (a) TRICARE Select Section 1075(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) (A) Consistent with other provisions of this chapter and subject to requirements to be prescribed by the Secretary, the Secretary may waive cost-sharing requirements for the first three outpatient mental health visits each year of any of the following beneficiaries: (i) Beneficiaries in the active-duty family member category. (ii) Beneficiaries covered by section 1110b of this title. (B) This paragraph shall terminate on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 . (b) TRICARE Prime Section 1075a(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) (A) Consistent with other provisions of this chapter and subject to requirements to be prescribed by the Secretary, the Secretary may waive cost-sharing requirements for the first three outpatient mental health visits each year of a beneficiary in the active-duty family member category (as described in section 1075(b)(1)(A) of this title). (B) This paragraph shall terminate on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 . 706. Expansion of doula care furnished by Department of Defense (a) Expansion of extramedical maternal health providers demonstration project Section 746 of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 ( Public Law 116–283 10 U.S.C. 1073 (1) by redesignating subsections (e) through (h) as subsections (f) through (i), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection (e): (e) Coverage of doula care Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (1) by members of the Armed Forces on active duty; (2) by beneficiaries outside the continental United States; and (3) at military medical treatment facilities. . (b) Hiring of doulas The hiring authority for each military medical treatment facility may hire a team of doulas to work in coordination with lactation support personnel or labor and delivery units at such facility. B Health Care Administration 711. Increase in stipend for participants in health professions scholarship and financial assistance programs Section 2121(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking $30,000 $50,000 712. Financial relief for civilians treated in military medical treatment facilities (a) Interim final rule required The Secretary of Defense shall issue an interim final rule to implement as soon as possible after the date of the enactment of this Act section 1079b of title 10, United States Code. (b) Treatment of claims (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Secretary shall hold in abeyance any claims under section 1079b of title 10, United States Code, until the interim final rule required under subsection (a) is in effect. (2) Exception Paragraph (1) does not apply to— (A) claims to third-party payers; or (B) administrative support provided to the Secretary by another Federal agency to assist the Secretary in the administration of section 1079b of title 10, United States Code. 713. Department of Defense Overdose Data Act of 2023 (a) Short title This section may be cited as the Department of Defense Overdose Data Act of 2023 (b) Annual report on military overdoses (1) In general Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the number of annual overdoses among servicemembers. (2) Contents The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) The total number of servicemembers who suffered a fatal or nonfatal overdose during the previous calendar year, including— (i) demographic information, including gender, race, age, military department, military rank, pay grade, and station; (ii) the location of the fatal overdose, including whether the overdose was on a military base; and (iii) a list of the substances involved in the fatal overdose. (B) Of the servicemembers identified in subparagraph (A)— (i) the number of servicemembers who received mental health or substance use disorder services prior to a fatal or nonfatal overdose, including a description of whether such services were received from a private sector provider; (ii) the number of servicemembers with comorbid mental health diagnoses; (iii) the number of servicemembers who had been prescribed opioids, benzodiazepines, or stimulants; (iv) the number of servicemembers who had been categorized as high-risk and prescribed or provided naloxone prior to a fatal or nonfatal overdose; (v) the number of servicemembers who had a positive drug test prior to the fatal overdose, including any substance identified in such test; (vi) the number of servicemembers referred to, including by self-referral, or engaged in medical treatment, including medication treatment for opioid use disorder; (vii) with respect to each servicemember identified in clause (vi), whether the servicemember was referred after a positive drug test and the source of such referral; and (viii) the number of fatal overdoses and intentional overdoses. (C) An analysis of discernable patterns in fatal and nonfatal overdoses of servicemembers. (D) A description of existing or anticipated response efforts to fatal and nonfatal overdoses at military bases that have rates of fatal overdoses that exceed the average rate of fatal overdoses in the United States. (E) An assessment of the availability of substance use disorder treatment for servicemembers. (F) The number of medical facilities of, or affiliated with, the Department of Defense that have opioid treatment programs. (G) A description of punitive measures taken by the Secretary of Defense in response to substance misuse, substance use disorder, or overdose by servicemembers. (3) Privacy (A) In general Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to authorize the disclosure by the Secretary of Defense of personally identifiable information of servicemembers or military family members, including anonymized personal information that could be used to re-identify servicemembers or military family members. (B) Application of HIPAA In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary of Defense shall take steps to protect the privacy of servicemembers and military family members pursuant to regulations promulgated under section 264(c) of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ( 42 U.S.C. 1320d–2 Public Law 104–191 (c) Standards for the use of materials to prevent overdose and substance use disorder Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish standards for the distribution of, and training for the use of, naloxone or other medication for overdose reversal, opioid disposal materials, fentanyl test strips, and other materials to prevent or reverse overdoses, substance use disorder, or impacts related to substance misuse. (d) Sunset This section shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate congressional committees The term appropriate congressional committees (A) the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. (2) Military family member The term military family member (3) Servicemember The term servicemember (A) a member of the Armed Forces; or (B) a member of the National Guard. 714. Modification of administration of medical malpractice claims by members of the uniformed services (a) In general Section 2733a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking subsection (f) subsection (j) (2) in subsection (b)(6), by striking subsection (f) subsection (j) (3) in subsection (d)(1), by striking subsection (f) subsection (j) (4) by redesignating subsections (f) through (i) as subsections (j) through (m), respectively; and (5) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsections: (f) Expert medical opinions (1) The Secretary of Defense may not use an expert medical opinion from an individual in determining whether to allow, settle, and pay a claim under this section unless the individual is a board-certified physician. (2) No claim under this section may be denied on medical grounds until the Secretary obtains an expert medical opinion on the medical malpractice alleged under such claim from an individual who— (A) is not a member of the uniformed services or a civilian employee of the Department of Defense; and (B) does not have a business, medical, or personal relationship with the claimant. (3) If a claim under this section is denied, the Secretary shall provide to the claimant information regarding the identity and qualifications of any individual who provided an expert medical opinion upon which such denial is based. (g) Justification of denial If a claim under this section is denied, the Secretary of Defense shall provide the claimant with detailed reasoning justifying the denial of the claim, including— (1) copies of any written reports prepared by any expert upon which the denial is based; and (2) all records and documents relied upon in preparing such written reports. (h) Appeals (1) Any appeal from the denial of a claim under this section shall be considered by a third-party review board jointly established by the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and the Secretary of Defense. (2) The third-party review board established under paragraph (1) shall consist of not more than five members, all of whom who possess sufficient legal or medical background, or both. (3) A claimant under this section that seeks an appeal under paragraph (1) may submit the appeal directly to the third-party review board established under such paragraph. (4) In considering an appeal from the denial of a claim under this section, the third-party review board established under paragraph (1) shall, at the request of the claimant, allow for a hearing on the merits of the appeal in an adversarial nature. (5) The Secretary of Defense shall provide to a claimant seeking an appeal under paragraph (1) a copy of any response to the appeal that is submitted on behalf of the Department of Defense. (6) The third-party review board established under paragraph (1) shall not consist of any member of the uniformed services or civilian employee of the Department of Defense. (i) Treatment of non-economic damages (1) Any non-economic damages provided to a member of the uniformed services under this section may not be offset by compensation provided or expected to be provided by the Department of Defense or the Department of Veterans Affairs. (2) (A) The Secretary of Defense shall establish a cap on non-economic damages to be provided with respect to a claim under this section. (B) (i) The cap established under subparagraph (A) shall be determined by calculating the average of non-economic damage caps for medical malpractice claims applicable in California, Texas, North Carolina, and Virginia. (ii) If a State specified in clause (i) provides a different cap for cases involving death and cases not involving death, the cap for cases not involving death shall be used. (C) The cap established under paragraph (1) shall be recalculated not less frequently than once every three years. . (b) Appointment of members Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and the Secretary of Defense shall jointly appoint members to the board established under subsection (h)(1) of section 2733a of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(5). (c) Report Not later than 180 days after the establishment of the board required under subsection (h)(1) of section 2733a of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(5), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report indicating— (1) the membership of the board; (2) the qualifying background of each member of the board; and (3) a statement indicating the independence of each member of the board from the Department of Defense. C Reports and Other Matters 721. Modification of partnership program between United States and Ukraine for military trauma care and research Section 736 of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (7) through (9) as paragraphs (8) through (10), respectively; and (2) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following new paragraph (7): (7) The provision of training and support to Ukraine for the treatment of individuals with extremity trauma, amputations, post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injuries, and any other mental health conditions associated with post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injuries, including— (A) the exchange of subject matter expertise; (B) training and support relating to advanced clinical skills development; and (C) training and support relating to clinical case management support. . 722. Requirement that Department of Defense disclose expert reports with respect to medical malpractice claims by members of the uniformed services Section 2733a of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 714, is further amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (l) and (m) as subsections (m) and (n), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (k) the following new subsection (l): (l) Disclosure by Department of Defense (1) The Secretary of Defense shall disclose to a claimant under this section a copy of all written reports, other than medical quality assurance records (as defined in section 1102(j) of this title), prepared by a medical expert of the Department of Defense or any medical expert consulted by the Department with respect to the claim. (2) Any disclosure under paragraph (1) with respect to an expert described in such paragraph shall include the following: (A) The records and documents considered by the expert. (B) A description of the bases and reasons for the opinion of the expert. (C) The opinion or opinions of the expert regarding standard of care. (D) The opinion or opinions of the expert regarding causation. (E) A description of any disagreement by the expert with any opinion or opinions of the expert of the claimant. (3) Any disclosure under paragraph (1) with respect to an expert described in such paragraph shall not include an identification of the expert. (4) If an expert described in paragraph (1) does not prepare a written report, the Secretary shall disclose the information required under this section to the claimant in writing. . 723. Comptroller General study on impact of perinatal mental health conditions of members of the Armed Forces and their dependents on military readiness and retention (a) Study (1) In general The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on perinatal mental health conditions among members of the Armed Forces and dependents of such members during the five-year period preceding the date of the enactment of this Act. (2) Elements The study required under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An assessment of beneficiaries under the TRICARE program, including members of the Armed Forces and dependents of such members, who attempted suicide or died by suicide or substance use overdose during the perinatal period. (B) An assessment of members of the Armed Forces discharged from active duty due to a mental health condition within two years after the perinatal period. (C) An assessment of beneficiaries under the TRICARE program, including members of the Armed Forces and dependents of such members, diagnosed with a perinatal mental health condition who were relocated during the perinatal period. (D) An assessment of the effects of retention and promotion policies of the Department of Defense relating to perinatal mental health conditions on members of the Armed Forces seeking and accessing screening, referral, and treatment. (E) The number of members of the Armed Forces who were separated from the Armed Forces or did not receive a promotion due to a diagnosed perinatal mental health condition. (F) An assessment of whether policies of the Department can be modified to provide clear standards for retention and pathways for promotion of members of the Armed Forces diagnosed with a perinatal mental health condition. (G) An assessment of resources needed to integrate behavioral health specialists into all obstetric care practices, pediatric practices, and women’s clinics. (H) A disaggregated demographic assessment of the population included in the study with respect to race, ethnicity, sex, age, family status (including dual service and single parent families), military occupation, military service, and rank, as applicable. (b) Report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the findings of the study conducted under subsection (a), including— (1) recommendations for actions to be taken by the Secretary of Defense to improve mental health among members of the Armed Forces and dependents of such members during the perinatal period; (2) recommendations for legislative or administrative action to mitigate the effects of retention and promotion policies of the Department of Defense on members of the Armed Forces seeking and accessing mental health care during the perinatal period; and (3) such other recommendations as the Comptroller General determines appropriate. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) Dependent; TRICARE program The terms dependent TRICARE program (2) Perinatal mental health condition The term perinatal mental health condition (3) Perinatal period The term perinatal period 724. Report on mental and behavioral health services provided by Department of Defense Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Defense Health Agency shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report that contains the following: (1) The current wait times for members of the Armed Forces, including members of the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve of a reserve component of the Armed Forces who are enrolled in TRICARE Reserve Select under section 1076d of title 10, United States Code, to receive mental and behavioral health services, disaggregated by State. (2) An assessment of the number of additional mental and behavioral health care providers needed for the Department of Defense to meet established metrics associated with access to mental and behavioral health services. (3) An explanation of the credentialing standards for mental and behavioral health care providers of the Department, including a comparison of those standards to the standards for other Federal and private sector health care providers. 725. Report on activities of Department of Defense to prevent, intervene, and treat perinatal mental health conditions of members of the Armed Forces and their dependents (a) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the activities of the Department of Defense to address the mental health of pregnant and postpartum members of the Armed Forces and dependents of such members. (b) Elements The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following (1) An identification of the military medical treatment facilities at which the Secretary offers members of the Armed Forces and their dependents evidence-based programs during the perinatal period that are proven to prevent perinatal mental health conditions. (2) An assessment of such programs offered at such facilities, including an assessment of— (A) the types of programs; (B) the number and location of programs; (C) the number of members of the Armed Forces and their dependents who have participated in such programs, disaggregated by Armed Force, military occupation, sex, age, race, and ethnicity, when applicable; and (D) whether such programs are delivered in-person or virtually and the frequency of the availability of such programs; (3) The number of behavioral health specialists for pregnant and postpartum members of the Armed Forces and dependents integrated into obstetric care practices, pediatrics, and women’s clinics at military medical treatment facilities. (4) An assessment of the implementation of, or plans to implement, a pilot program to provide a reproductive behavioral health consultation service by the Secretary as outlined in the White House Blueprint for Addressing the Maternal Health Crisis, dated June 2022, including— (A) the number of providers the pilot program has served or plans to serve, disaggregated by provider type, specialty, and location; (B) the number and type of trainings providers received or will receive through the consultation line on evidence-based practices to prevent, screen, refer, and treat perinatal mental health conditions; (C) the locations that have had or will have access to the pilot program; (D) the types of expertise services that the consultation line provides or will provide; and (E) methods currently used or that will be used to promote the availability of the consultation line to providers. (5) Any recommendations for legislative or administrative action to improve prevention, intervention, and treatment of perinatal mental health conditions for members of the Armed Forces and their dependents. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) Dependent The term dependent (2) Perinatal mental health condition The term perinatal mental health condition 726. Study on family planning and cryopreservation of gametes to improve retention of members of the Armed Forces (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study on— (1) the number of members of the Armed Forces who elect to leave the Armed Forces for family planning reasons, disaggregated by gender, age, and military occupational specialty; (2) whether the option of cryopreservation of gametes would lead to greater retention of members of the Armed Forces; (3) methods for the Department of Defense to offer cryopreservation of gametes for the purposes of retention of members of the Armed Forces; (4) the cost to the Department of offering cryopreservation of gametes to active duty members of the Armed Forces; and (5) such other matters relating to family planning and cryopreservation of gametes for members of the Armed Forces as the Secretary considers relevant. (b) Briefing Not later than April 1, 2024, the Secretary shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the results of the study conducted under subsection (a). VIII Acquisition policy, acquisition management, and related matters A Acquisition policy and management 801. Amendments to multiyear procurement authority Section 3501 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(1)— (A) by striking will result in significant savings (A) significant savings ; and (B) by striking annual contracts. (B) necessary industrial base stability not otherwise achievable through annual contracts. ; and (2) by striking $500,000,000 $1,000,000,000 802. Modernizing the Department of Defense requirements process (a) Modernizing the department of defense requirements process Not later than October 1, 2025, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in cooperation with the Secretaries of the military departments and the commanders of the combatant commands, and in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, shall develop and implement a streamlined Department of Defense requirements process, to include modernizing the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System, in order to improve alignment between modern warfare concepts, technologies, and system development and reduce the time to delivery of needed capabilities to Department users. (b) Reform elements The modernization activities conducted under subsection (a) shall include the following elements: (1) Streamlining requirements documents, reviews, and approval processes, especially for programs below the major defense acquisition program threshold described in section 4201 of title 10, United Stated Code. (2) Revisiting requirements management practices from a first principles perspective based on mission outcomes and assessed threats, enabling a more iterative and collaborative approach with the services to shape requirements and technology driven opportunities. (3) Developing a capability needs and requirements framework and pathways that are aligned to the Department’s Adaptive Acquisition Framework pathways, and better aligned and integrated with the Department’s science and technology processes. (4) Enabling the military departments to develop an enduring set of requirements according to a set of capability portfolios to provide a structure across acquisition programs and research, which shall be articulated in a concise model and document with a set of mission impact measures that capability deliveries will seek to continuously improve. (5) Establishing a process to rapidly validate the military utility of commercial solutions to meet capability needs or opportunities in lieu of the traditional program-centric requirements definition. (6) Retiring and replacing the Department of Defense Architecture Framework with a new structure focused on enabling interoperability through application program interfaces, enterprise architectures and platforms, and government and commercial standards. (7) Ensuring that requirements processes for software, artificial intelligence, data, and related capability areas enable a rapid, dynamic, and iterative approach than traditional hardware systems. (c) Elements The implementation of streamlined requirements shall include the following elements: (1) Collaboration with industry, traditional and non-traditional defense companies, and the science and technology community to capture their inputs and feedback on shaping the Department’s requirements processes to ensure it effectively harnesses the innovation ecosystem. (2) Development of a formal career path, training, and structure for requirements management professionals and chief architects. (3) Publication of new policies, guidance, and templates for the operational, requirements, and acquisition workforce in online digital formats instead of large policy documents. (d) Interim report Not later than October 1, 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an interim report on the modernization conducted by the Secretary under subsection (a), including— (1) a description of the modernization efforts; (2) the Department of Defense’s plans to implement, communicate, and continuously improve the modernization of the Department’s requirements processes and structure; and (3) any additional recommendations for legislation that the Secretary determines appropriate. (e) Final report Not later than October 1, 2025, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Secretary of Defense and the congressional defense committees a final report describing activities carried out pursuant to subsections (b) and (c). 803. Head of Contracting Authority for Strategic Capabilities Office (a) Authority The Director of the Strategic Capabilities Office shall have the authority to conduct acquisition activities within the Strategic Capabilities Office. (b) Acquisition executive – (1) In general The staff of the Director shall include an acquisition executive, who shall be responsible for the overall supervision of acquisition matters for the Strategic Capabilities Office. The acquisition executive shall have the authority— (A) to negotiate memoranda of agreement with the military departments and Department of Defense components to carry out the acquisition of equipment, capabilities, and services on behalf of the Office; (B) to supervise the acquisition of equipment, capabilities, and services on behalf of the Office; (C) to represent the Office in discussions with the military departments regarding acquisition programs for which the Office is a customer; and (D) to work with the military departments to ensure that the Office is appropriately represented in any joint working group or integrated product team regarding acquisition programs for which the Office is a customer. (2) Delivery of acquisition solutions The acquisition executive of the Strategic Capabilities Office shall be— (A) responsible to the Director for rapidly delivering acquisition solutions to meet validated cyber operations-peculiar requirements; (B) subordinate to the defense acquisition executive in matters of acquisition; (C) subject to the same oversight as the service acquisition executives; and (D) included on the distribution list for acquisition directives and instructions of the Department of Defense. (c) Implementation plan required The authority granted in subsection (a) shall become effective 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense provides to the congressional defense committees a plan for implementation of those authorities under subsection (a). The plan shall include the following: (1) Summaries of the components to be negotiated in the memoranda of agreement with the military departments and other Department of Defense components to carry out the development, acquisition, and sustainment of equipment, capabilities, and services described in subsection (b)(1). (2) Negotiation and approval timelines for memorandum of agreement. (3) A plan for oversight of the acquisition executive established under subsection (b). (4) An assessment of the acquisition workforce needs of the Strategic Capabilities Office to support the authority provided under subsection (a) until 2028. (5) Other matters as appropriate. (d) Annual end-of-year assessment Each year, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall review and assess the acquisition activities of the Strategic Capabilities Office, including contracting and acquisition documentation, for the previous fiscal year and provide any recommendations or feedback to the acquisition executive of the Strategic Capabilities Office. (e) Sunset (1) In general The authority provided under this section shall terminate on September 30, 2028. (2) Limitation on duration of acquisitions The authority under this section does not include major defense acquisition programs, major automated information system programs, or acquisitions of foundational infrastructure or software architectures the duration of which is expected to last more than five years. 804. Pilot program for the use of innovative intellectual property strategies (a) In general As soon as practicable, the Secretary of each military department shall designate one acquisition program within their service and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall designate one acquisition program within the Department of Defense Agencies and Field Activities for the use of innovative intellectual property strategies in order to acquire the necessary technical data rights required for the operations and maintenance of that system. (b) Briefing requirement Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall provide a briefing to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives with a detailed plan to implement the requirements of this section. (c) Annual report Upon selection of the programs to be covered by this section and until the termination of this authority, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall provide an annual report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the effectiveness of the pilot program in acquiring the data necessary to support timely, cost-effective maintenance and sustainment of the system and any recommendations for the applicability of lessons learned from this pilot program to future acquisition programs. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) Department of Defense Agencies and Field Activities The terms Department of Defense Agency Department of Defense Field Activity (2) Innovative intellectual property strategies The term innovative intellectual property strategies (A) The use of an escrow account to verify and hold intellectual property data. (B) The use of royalties or licenses. (C) Other innovative strategies to acquire the necessary level of intellectual property and data rights to support the operations, maintenance, installation, and training (OMIT) of the selected program. (e) Sunset The authority to initiate a program under this section shall terminate on December 31, 2028. 805. Focused commercial solutions openings opportunities (a) Requirement The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the service acquisition executives of each military department, shall create not less than three new commercial solutions opening (CSO) opportunities pursuant to section 3458 of title 10, United States Code, each fiscal year. Each such CSO opportunities shall be dedicated to addressing the mission needs and integrated priority lists of a single geographic combatant command. (b) Execution In creating the CSO opportunities required under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall— (1) assign the responsibility for issuing a CSO to a single military department, with a program executive officer from that military department assigned as lead; and (2) ensure that any program executive office (PEO) assignment should be made to align the needs of the CSO with a PEO that has similar existing requirements and funding for transitioning technologies within the focus area. (c) Sunset The requirement in subsection (a) shall expire on September 30, 2027. 806. Study on reducing barriers to acquisition of commercial products and services (a) In general The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, shall conduct a study on the feasibility and advisability of— (1) establishing a default determination that products and services acquired by the Department of Defense are commercial and do not require commercial determination as provided under section 3456 of title 10, United States Code; (2) establishing a requirement for non-commercial determinations to be made for acquisitions to use procedures other than part 12 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation; and (3) mandating use of commercial procedures under part 12 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation unless a justification of non-commerciality is determined. (b) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the findings of the study conducted under subsection (a). The report shall include specific findings with relevant data and proposed recommendations, including for any necessary and desirable modifications to applicable statute for any changes the Department seeks to make regarding paragraphs (1) through (3) of subsection (a). 807. Sense of the Senate on independent cost assessment It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) to implement the National Defense Strategy, the Department of Defense requires thoughtful and thorough analysis to ensure efficient and effective use of each taxpayer dollar to inform tradeoff analysis that delivers the optimum portfolio of military capabilities; (2) the Secretary of Defense requires timely, insightful, and unbiased analysis on cost estimation for major defense acquisition programs; and (3) the Office of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation supports implementation of the National Defense Strategy by— (A) providing insight into the costs of major defense acquisition programs and other technology development initiatives that enables responsible budgeting and proactive management decisions so that the Department can control cost, drive efficiency, and achieve savings; (B) ensuring that the cost estimation workforce of the Department of Defense is using the most modern and realistic cost estimation methodologies, tools, and tradecraft, including the collection and distribution of data through the Cost Assessment Data Enterprise; and (C) providing timely review and oversight of cost estimates performed by the defense agencies and military departments. 808. Emergency acquisition authority for purposes of replenishing United States stockpiles Section 3601(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A)(iv), by striking ; or (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; or (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (C) for purposes of— (i) replenishing United States stockpiles with like defense articles when those stockpiles are diminished as a result of the United States providing defense articles in response to an armed attack by a country of concern (as that term is defined in section 1(m) of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 ( 22 U.S.C. 2651a(m) (I) a United States ally (as that term is defined in section 201(d) of the Act of December 2, 1942, entitled, To provide benefits for the injury, disability, death, or enemy detention of employees of contractors with the United States, and for other purposes 42 U.S.C. 1711(d) (II) a United States partner; or (ii) contracting for the movement or delivery of defense articles transferred to such ally or partner through the President's drawdown authorities in connection with such response, provided that the United States is not a party to the hostilities. . B Amendments to general contracting authorities, procedures, and limitations 811. Commander initiated rapid contracting actions (a) In general The commander of a combatant command, upon providing a written determination to a supporting head (or heads) of contracting activity (HCA), may request emergency, rapid contracting response using special authorities described in subsection (b)— (1) in support of a contingency operation (as defined in section 101(a) of title 10, United States Code); (2) to facilitate the defense against or recovery from cyber, nuclear, biological, chemical, or radiological attack against the United States; (3) in support of a humanitarian or peacekeeping operation (as the term is defined in section 3015(2) of title 10, United States Code); and (4) for purposes of protecting the national security interests of the United States during directed operations that fall below the level of armed conflict. (b) Applicability In carrying out subsection (a), the HCA may utilize the following authorities to rapidly respond to time-sensitive or unplanned emergency situations: (1) For actions taken under subsection (a) in the case of a contract to be awarded and performed, or purchase to be made, in the United States, simplified procedures for a single contracting action may be used up to $15,000. (2) For actions taken under subsection (a) in the case of a contract to be awarded and performed, or purchase to be made, outside the United States, simplified procedures for a single contracting action may be used up to $25,000. (3) For purposes of section 3205(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the applicable threshold is deemed to be $10,000,000. (4) The property or service being procured may be treated as a commercial product or a commercial service for the purpose of carrying out the procurement. (c) Determination A written determination required under subsection (a) may be used to cover more than one requested action, and may be directed to more than one HCA, and shall include: (1) The rationale for initiating the request in accordance with paragraphs (1) though (4) of such subsection. (2) A description of the actions being requested of the HCA. (3) A declaration that funds are available for such requested contracting support. (d) Sunset The authority under subsection (a) shall terminate on September 30, 2028. (e) Annual report Not later than January 15, 2025, and annually thereafter for four years, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, shall provide a report to the congressional defense committees on the use of the authority under this section for the previous fiscal year. The report shall include a summary of each instance of the authority being used, including— (1) the combatant command initiating the action or actions; (2) the supporting HCA or HCAs; and (3) the specific actions requested, including the contract performer and value of contracting action. 812. Extension and revisions to never contract with the enemy (a) In general Section 841 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck Public Law 113–291 10 U.S.C. 4871 (1) by striking the section heading and inserting Threat mitigation in commercial support to operations (2) in subsection (a)— (A) by striking the subsection heading and inserting Program established (B) by striking and in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of State, establish a program to enable combatant commanders to identify and manage risks introduced by covered persons and entities providing commercial support to military operations. The Secretary of Defense shall publish policy establishing this program with responsibilities for program execution and oversight and procedures for use of available intelligence, security, and law enforcement information to identify threats and employment of a range of strategies, including the covered procurement actions described in this section, to manage risks posed by covered persons and entities that are engaged in covered activities. (3) by amending subsection (b) to read as follows: (b) Authority (1) Identification The combatant commander shall identify covered persons or entities engaged in covered activities through the program established under subsection (a). Upon identification of a covered person or entity, combatant commanders, or their designated deputies, shall notify and provide rationale for such an identification to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, and the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. (2) Covered procurement actions (A) In general The head of a contracting activity may exercise a covered procurement action on a covered persons or entity. (B) Limitation on covered procurement actions The head of a contracting activity may exercise a covered procurement action only after receiving a notification and recommendation from the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, based on a risk assessment by the identifying combatant commander, that states that— (i) the person or entity identified by the combatant commander meets the criteria for a covered person or entity and was or is actively engaged in one or more covered activities; and (ii) less intrusive measures are not reasonably available to manage the risk. ; (4) by amending subsection (c) to read as follows: (c) Notification to covered person or entity (1) Advance notice Contracting activities shall notify covered persons and entities through covered solicitations and contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements of the following matters: (A) The program established under subsection (a). (B) The authorities established under subsection (b). (C) The responsibilities of covered persons or entities to exercise due diligence to mitigate their engagement in covered activities. (2) Notice of covered procurement actions (A) In general Upon exercising a covered procurement action, the head of a contracting activity shall notify the covered person or entity of the action. The covered person or entity shall be permitted the opportunity to challenge the covered procurement action by requesting an administrative review of the action under the procedures of the Department of Defense not later than 30 days after receipt of notice of the action. (B) Limitation on disclosure of information Full disclosure of information to a covered person or entity justifying an identification made under subsection (b)(1) or a covered procurement action need not be provided when such a disclosure would compromise national security or would pose an unacceptable threat to personnel of the United States or partners and allies. (C) Protection of classified information Classified information relied upon to exercise a covered procurement action may not be disclosed to a covered person or entity, or to their representatives, unless a protective order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction established under article I or article III of the Constitution of the United States specifically addresses the conditions under which such classified information may be disclosed. ; (5) by amending subsection (d) to read as follows: (d) Covered procurement action reporting All covered procurement actions shall be reported to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment and reported in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) or other formal systems or record. Exclusions shall also be reported in the System for Award Management (SAM). ; (6) by amending subsection (e) to read as follows: (e) Annual review The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of State, shall, on an annual basis, review the lists of persons and entities having been subject to a covered procurement action under subsection (b)(2) to determine whether or not such persons and entities continue to warrant use of the covered procurement action. ; (7) by amending subsection (f) to read as follows: (f) Waiver The Secretary of Defense, in conjunction with the Secretary of State, may grant a waiver for actions taken under subsection (b) if it is in the best interest of national security. ; (8) by amending subsection (g) to read as follows: (g) Delegation of authority The authority provided by subsection (b) to make a determination to use a covered procurement action, in whole or in part, may not be delegated below the level of head of contracting activity, or equivalent official for purposes of grants or cooperative agreements. ; (9) by amending subsection (h) to read as follows: (h) Updating regulations The Federal Acquisition Regulation and the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement shall be revised to implement the provisions of this subtitle. ; (10) in subsection (i)— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) by striking Director of the Office of Management and Budget Secretary of Defense (ii) by striking appropriate committees of Congress congressional defense committees (iii) in subparagraph (A)— (I) by striking an executive agency exercised the authority to terminate, void, or restrict a contract, grant, and cooperative agreement pursuant to subsection (c), based on a notification under subsection (b) a head of contracting activity exercised a covered procurement action (II) in clause (i) by striking executive agency head of contracting activity (III) in clause (ii), by striking the action taken exercising the covered procurement action (IV) in clause (iii), by striking voided or terminated subject to the covered procurement action (V) in clause (iv)— (aa) by striking executive agency in force Department of Defense has (bb) by striking concerned at the time the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement was terminated or voided at the time of exercise of the covered procurement action (iv) in subparagraph (B)— (I) by striking an executive agency did not exercise the authority to terminate, void, or restrict a contract, grant, and cooperative agreement pursuant to subsection (c), based on a notification under subsection (b) a head of contracting activity did not exercise a covered procurement action following an identification from a combatant commander (II) in clause (i), by striking executive agency head of contracting activity (III) in clause (ii), by inserting covered procurement action (B) in paragraph (2), by striking Director Secretary of Defense (11) by striking subsection (j) and (m) and redesignating subsections (k), (l), and (n) as subsections (j), (k), and (l), respectively; (12) in subsection (k), as redesignated by paragraph (11), by striking Except as provided in subsection (l), the The (13) in subsection (l), as so redesignated, by striking December 31, 2025 December 31, 2033 (b) Access to records Section 842 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck (a) Additional access to records The Secretary of Defense may examine any records of persons or entities that have existing contracts with, or are active recipients of a grant or cooperative agreement from, the Department of Defense, including any subcontractors or subgrantees, to the extent necessary to support the program established under section 841 of this Act. (b) Limitation The examination authorized under subsection (a) may only take place after a written determination is made by the contracting officer, informed by a finding from the combatant commander, stating that this examination will support the program established under such section 841, and less intrusive measures are not reasonably available to manage the risk. . (c) Definitions Section 843 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck (1) by striking paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), (7), and (9) and redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), and (8) as paragraphs (2), (3), and (6); (2) by inserting before paragraph (2), as redesignated by paragraph (1) of this section, the following new paragraph: (1) Covered activities The term covered activities (A) engaging in acts of violence against personnel of the United States or partners and allies; (B) providing financing, logistics, training, or intelligence to a person described in subparagraph (A); (C) engaging in foreign intelligence activities against the United States or partners and allies; (D) engaging in transnational organized crime or criminal activities; or (E) engaging in other activities that present a direct or indirect risk to United States or partner and allied missions and forces. ; (3) in paragraph (2), as so redesignated, by striking with an estimated value in excess of $50,000 that is performed outside the United States, including its territories and possessions, in support that is performed outside the United States, including its territories and possessions. (4) by amending paragraph (3), as so redesignated, to read as follows: (3) Covered person or entity The term covered person or entity ; and (5) by inserting after paragraph (3), as so redesignated, the following new paragraphs: (4) Covered procurement action The term covered procurement action (A) exclude a person or commercial entity from award with or without an existing contract, grant, or cooperative agreement; (B) terminate an existing contract, grant, or cooperative agreement for default; or (C) void in whole or in part an existing contract, grant, or cooperative agreement. (5) Covered solicitation The term covered solicitation . (d) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act, and shall apply to covered solicitations issued and covered contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements (as that term is defined in section 843 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck 813. Enhancement of Department of Defense capabilities to prevent contractor fraud (a) Withholding of contractual payments Subsection (a) of section 4651 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ; and (2) in paragraph (2)— (A) by striking clause (1) paragraph (1) (B) by striking at least three, but not more than 10, as determined by the Secretary or his designee, times the cost incurred by the contractor in giving gratuities to the officer, official, or employee concerned. of up to 10 percent of the total contract award amount; (3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraphs: (3) with respect to a contract that could have been terminated under paragraph (1) but for the completion of performance of the contract, the United States is entitled to exemplary damages as set forth in paragraph (2); and (4) the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department may, after providing notice to the contractor and pending the determination concerning exemplary damages referred to in paragraph (2), withhold from payments otherwise due to the contractor under any contract between the contractor and the United States an amount not to exceed 10 percent of the total contract award amount. ; and (4) in the matter following paragraph (4), as added by paragraph (3) of this subsection, by striking clause (1) paragraph (1) (b) Burden of proof Paragraph (1) of section 4651(a) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a) of this section, is further amended by inserting and by a preponderance of the evidence after notice and hearing 814. Modification of approval authority for high dollar other transaction agreements for prototypes (a) Amendments relating to authority Section 4022(a)(2)(C)(i)(I) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after subsection (d) were met for the prior transaction for the prototype project that provided for the award of the follow-on production contract or transaction, and the requirements of subsection (f) (b) Amendment relating to appropriate use of authority Section 4022(d) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) The requirements of this subsection do not apply to follow-on production contracts or transactions under subsection (f). . 815. Modifications to Earned Value Management system requirements (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary for Acquisition and Sustainment shall update appropriate policies related to Earned Value Management (EVM) as follows: (1) Update subpart 234.2 of the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to exempt all software contracts and subcontracts from EVM requirements. (2) Update sections 234.201, 234.203, 252.234–7001, and 252.242–7002 of the DFARS— (A) to increase contract value thresholds associated with requiring EVM on cost or incentive contracts from $20,000,000 to $50,000,000; and (B) to increase the contract value threshold for the contractor to use an EVM System from $50,000,000 to $100,000,000. (b) Implementation If the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment is unable to update the regulations specified in subsection (a) before the deadline specified in such subsection, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall providing to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a briefing explaining the timeline for implementation. 816. Inventory of inflation and escalation indices (a) Inventory required (1) In general Not later than September 30, 2024, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in coordination with the Service Acquisition Executives, shall conduct an inventory of inflation and escalation indices currently used for contracting and pricing purposes across the Department and make the inventory available as a resource for all government and industry contracting and pricing professionals. (2) Elements The inventory required under paragraph (1)— (A) shall include indices used for products and indices used for services, including accessibility instructions; (B) may include relevant indices derived from or leveraged by commercial, academic, or nongovernmental sources; and (C) shall separately identify indices for which the Department of Defense purchases access. (b) Assessment As part of the inventory required under subsection (a), the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall also conduct an assessment of the available inflation and escalation indices in order to determine— (1) gaps in any available indices where identification or development of new indices may be necessary; and (2) in instances where there are multiple indices being used— (A) whether consolidation on a single index or smaller subset of indices is possible or advisable; and (B) whether commercial, academic, or nongovernmental indices have any comparative benefit or advantage over governmental sources. (c) Periodic updates The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall periodically, and not less than once every 5 years, review and update the inventory required under subsection (a). (d) Guidance Not later than March 30, 2025, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in coordination with the Service Acquisition Executives, shall issue guidance providing for the consistent application and maintenance of data included in the inventory required under subsection (a) for use by government contracting and pricing personnel. 817. Pilot program to incentivize progress payments (a) Pilot program The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall establish and implement a pilot program to incentivize large business concerns awarded Department of Defense contracts to qualify for progress payments up to 10 percentage points higher than the standard progress payment rate. (b) Incentives The Under Secretary for Acquisition and Sustainment shall establish clear and measurable criteria to provide for the payment to contractors of higher progress payments as described in subsection (a), including meeting one or more of the following criteria: (1) Adherence to delivery dates for contract end items and contract data requirement lists or compliance with the performance milestone schedule during the preceding fiscal year. (2) The lack of any open level III or IV corrective action requests. (3) Acceptability of the contractor's business systems without significant deficiencies. (4) Meeting small business subcontracting goals during the preceding fiscal year. (c) Report The Under Secretary for Acquisition and Sustainment shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives an annual report on the implementation of the pilot program established under subsection (a), including a comprehensive list of contractors and the contracts that received the increased progress payments. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) Standard progress payment rate The term standard progress payment rate (2) Large business concerns The term large business concerns (e) Sunset The authority to carry out the pilot program established under subsection (a) shall terminate on January 1, 2026. 818. Extension of pilot program to accelerate contracting and pricing processes Section 890 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 January 2, 2024 January 2, 2028 819. Preventing conflicts of interest for Department of Defense consultants (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall amend the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation— (1) to require any entity that provides the services described in North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 5416, prior to entering into the Department of Defense contract, to certify that— (A) neither the entity nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates hold a contract with one or more covered foreign entities; or (B) the entity maintains a Conflict of Interest Mitigation Surveillance Plan described under subsection (b) that is auditable by contract oversight entities; and (2) to restrict Department of Defense contracts from being awarded to an entity that provides the services described under the NAICS code 5416, if the entity or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates are determined, based on the self-certification required under paragraph (1) or other information, to be a contractor of, or otherwise providing services to, a covered foreign entity unless such contractor maintains an enforceable Conflict of Interest Mitigation Surveillance Plan. (b) Conflict of Interest Mitigation Surveillance Plan Contractors that are unable to certify under subsection (a)(1)(A) that neither they nor any of their subsidiaries or affiliates hold a contract with one or more covered foreign entities shall maintain a Conflict of Interest Mitigation Surveillance Plan that is updated annually and shall be provided to applicable contract oversight entities upon request. The plan shall include— (1) identification of the contracts with the covered foreign entity (or entities) including the specific entity, the dollar value of the contract, and the specific personnel working on the contract; (2) mitigation measures being taken to prevent conflicts of interest (corporately as well as for individuals working on the contract) that might arise by also supporting Department of Defense contracts; and (3) notification procedures to the contract oversight entities within 15 days of determining an unmitigated conflict of interest has arisen. (c) Waiver The Secretary of Defense, or designee, shall have the authority to waive conflicts of interest restrictions under subsection (a) on a case-by-case basis as may be necessary to continue contracting for certain national security requirements. The Secretary of Defense may not delegate such authority to an official below the level of a Presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed official. (d) Waiver notification Not later than 30 days after issuing a waiver under subsection (c) of this section, the Secretary of Defense shall provide a written notification to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives regarding the use of such waiver authority. The notification shall include— (1) the specific justification for providing the waiver; (2) the covered foreign entity with which the waiver recipient is working which gives rise to the conflict of interest; (3) the number of bidders on a contract on which the waiver was required; (4) the number of bidders on a contract for which a waiver would not have been required to have been issued; and (5) the total dollar value of the contract. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered foreign entity The term covered foreign entity (A) The Government of the People’s Republic of China, any Chinese state-owned entity, or other entity under the ownership, or control, directly or indirectly, of the Government of the People’s Republic of China or the Chinese Communist Party that is engaged in one or more national security industries. (B) The Government of the Russian Federation, any Russian state-owned entity, or any entity sanctioned by the Secretary of the Treasury under Executive Order 13662 titled Blocking Property of Additional Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine (C) The government or any state-owned entity of any country if the Secretary of State determines that such government has repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism pursuant to— (i) section 1754(c)(1)(A) of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4318(c)(1)(A) (ii) section 620A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 ( 22 U.S.C. 2371 (iii) section 40 of the Arms Export Control Act ( 22 U.S.C. 2780 (iv) any other provision of law. (D) Any entity included on any of the following lists maintained by the Department of Commerce: (i) The Entity List set forth in Supplement No. 4 to part 744 of the Export Administration Regulations. (ii) The Denied Persons List as described in section 764.3(a)(2) of the Export Administration Regulations. (iii) The Unverified List set forth in Supplement No. 6 to part 744 of the Export Administration Regulations. (iv) The Military End User List set forth in Supplement No. 7 to part 744 of the Export Administration Regulations. (2) Contract oversight entities The term contract oversight entities (A) The contracting officer. (B) The contracting officer representative. (C) The Defense Contract Management Agency. (D) The Defense Contract Audit Agency. (E) The Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Defense or any subcomponent of OIG. (F) The Government Accountability Office. 820. Prohibition on requiring defense contractors to provide information relating to greenhouse gas emissions (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Greenhouse Gas The term greenhouse gas (A) carbon dioxide; (B) methane; (C) nitrous oxide; (D) nitrogen trifluoride; (E) hydrofluorocarbons; (F) perfluorcarbons; or (G) sulfur hexafluoride. (2) Greenhouse gas inventory The term greenhouse gas inventory (3) Nontraditional defense contractor The term nontraditional defense contractor (b) Prohibition on disclosure requirements (1) Nontraditional defense contractors The Secretary of Defense may not require any nontraditional defense contractor recipient of a defense contract to provide a greenhouse gas inventory or to provide any other report on greenhouse gas emissions. (2) Other than nontraditional defense contractors During the two-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense may not require any other than nontraditional defense contractor recipient of a defense contract to provide a greenhouse gas inventory or to provide any other report on greenhouse gas emissions. 821. Prohibition on contracts for the provision of online tutoring services by entities owned by the People's Republic of China (a) In general The Secretary of Defense may not, on or after the date of the enactment of this Act, enter into or renew a contract for the provision of online tutoring services by an entity owned or controlled by the Government of the People's Republic of China. (b) Waiver (1) In general The Secretary may waive the prohibition under subsection (a). (2) Nondelegation The Secretary may not delegate the authority to issue a waiver under paragraph (1). 822. Modification of truthful cost or pricing data submissions and report Section 3705(b)(2)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking should-cost analysis. past performance. should-cost analysis and shall identify such offerors that incur a delay greater than 200 days in submitting such cost or pricing data. The Secretary of Defense shall include a public notation on such offerors. C Industrial base matters 831. Defense industrial base advanced capabilities pilot program (a) Establishment (1) In general The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall carry out a pilot program through a public-private partnership to accelerate the scaling, production, and acquisition of advanced defense capabilities determined by the Under Secretary to be critical to the national security by creating incentives for investment in domestic small businesses or nontraditional businesses to create a robust and resilient defense industrial base. (2) Goals The goals of the public-private partnership pilot program are as follows: (A) To bolster the defense industrial base through acquisition and deployment of advanced capabilities necessary to field Department of Defense modernization programs and priorities. (B) To strengthen domestic defense supply chain resilience and capacity by investing in innovative defense companies. (C) To leverage private equity capital to accelerate domestic defense scaling, production, and manufacturing. (b) Public-private partnerships (1) In general In carrying out subsection (a), the Under Secretary shall enter into one or more public-private partnerships, consistent with the phased implementation provided for in subsection (e), with for-profit persons using the criteria set forth in paragraph (2). (2) Criteria The Under Secretary shall establish criteria for entering into one or more public-private partnerships and shall submit to the congressional defense committees such criteria, which shall not take effect for the purposes of entering into any agreement until 30 days after submission. (3) Operating agreement The Under Secretary and a person or persons with whom the Under Secretary enters a partnership under paragraph (1) shall enter into an operating agreement that sets forth the roles, responsibilities, authorities, reporting requirements, term, and governance framework for the partnership and its operations. Such operating agreements may not take effect until 30 days after they have been submitted to the congressional defense committees. (c) Investment of equity (1) In general Pursuant to public-private partnerships entered into under subsection (b), a person or persons with whom the Under Secretary has entered into a partnership may invest equity in domestic small businesses or nontraditional businesses consistent with subsection (a), with investments selected based on technical merit, economic value, and the Department’s modernization priorities. The partnership shall require investment in not less than 10 businesses, with no business representing greater than 20 percent of total investment and no capability area exceeding 40 percent of total investment (2) Authorities A person or persons described in paragraph (1) shall have sole authority to operate, manage, and invest. (d) Loan guarantee (1) In general Pursuant to the authority established under section __ (2) Pilot program authority The temporary loan guarantee authority described under paragraph (1) is exclusively for the public-private partnerships authorized under this section and may not be utilized for other programs or purposes. (3) Subject to operating agreement The loan guarantee under paragraph (1) shall be subject to the operating agreement entered into under subsection (b)(3). (4) Use of funds Obligations incurred by the Under Secretary under this paragraph shall be subject to the availability of funds provided in advance specifically for the purpose of such loan guarantees. (e) Phased implementation schedule and required reports and briefings The program established under subsection (a) shall be carried out in two phases as follows: (1) Phase 1 (A) In general Phase 1 shall consist of an initial pilot program with one public-private partnership, consistent with subsection (b), to assess the feasibility and advisability of expanding the scope of the program. The Under Secretary shall begin implementation of phase 1 not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (B) Implementation schedule and framework Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit an implementation plan to the congressional defense committees on the design of phase 1. The plan shall include— (i) an overview of, and the activities undertaken, to execute the public-private partnership; (ii) a description of the advanced capabilities and defense industrial base areas under consideration for investment; (iii) an overview of the operating agreement described in subsection (b)(3); and (iv) implementation milestones and metrics. (C) Report and briefing required Not later than 27 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a report and briefing on the implementation of this section and the feasibility and advisability of expanding the scope of the pilot program. The report and briefing shall include, at minimum— (i) an overview of program performance, and implementation and execution milestones and outcomes; (ii) an overview of progress in— (I) achieving new products in production aligned with Department of Defense needs; (II) scaling businesses aligned to targeted industrial base and capability areas; (III) generating defense industrial base job growth; (IV) increasing supply chain resilience and capacity; and (V) enhancing competition on advanced capability programs; (iii) an accounting of activities undertaken and outline of the opportunities and benefits of expanding the scope of the pilot program; and (iv) a recommendation by the Secretary regarding the feasibility and desirability of expanding the pilot program. (2) Phase 2 (A) In general Not later than 30 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary may expand the scope of the phase 1 pilot program with the ability to increase to not more than three public-private partnerships, consistent with subsection (b). (B) Report and briefing required Not later than five years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a report and briefing on the outcomes of the pilot program under subsection (a), including the elements described in paragraph (1)(C), and the feasibility and advisability of making the program permanent. (f) Termination The authority to enter into an agreement to carry out the pilot program under subsection (a) shall terminate on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act. (g) Definitions In this section: (1) Domestic business The term domestic business U.S. business (2) Domestic small businesses or nontraditional businesses The term domestic small businesses or nontraditional businesses (A) a small business that is a domestic business; or (B) a nontraditional business that is a domestic business. (3) Nontraditional business The term nontraditional business nontraditional defense contractor (4) Small business The term small business small business concern 15 U.S.C. 632 832. Department of Defense notification of certain transactions (a) In general The parties to a covered transaction required to file the notification and provide supplementary information to the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission under section 7A of the Clayton Act ( 15 U.S.C. 18a 15 U.S.C. 18a (b) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered transaction The term covered transaction (A) for which the parties are required to file a notification under section 7A of the Clayton Act ( 15 U.S.C. 18a (B) any party to which is, owns, or controls a major defense supplier. (2) Major defense supplier The term major defense supplier (A) a current prime contractor of a major defense acquisition program as defined in chapter 201 (B) a current prime contractor of a middle tier acquisition as defined pursuant to section 804 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( Public Law 114–92 (C) a current prime contractor of a software acquisition program described under section 800 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (D) a current prime contractor of a defense business system as defined in section 2222 of title 10, United States Code; or (E) a current prime contractor of a service contract with the Department of Defense, as defined in part 237 of the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, above the simplified acquisition threshold. 833. Analyses of certain activities for action to address sourcing and industrial capacity (a) Analysis required (1) In general The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment and other appropriate officials, shall review the items under subsection (c) to determine and develop appropriate actions, consistent with the policies, programs, and activities required under subpart I of part V of subtitle A of title 10, United States Code, chapter 83 50 U.S.C. 4501 et seq. (A) restricting procurement, with appropriate waivers for cost, emergency requirements, and non-availability of suppliers, including restricting procurement to— (i) suppliers in the United States; (ii) suppliers in the national technology and industrial base (as defined in section 4801 of title 10, United States Code); (iii) suppliers in other allied nations; or (iv) other suppliers; (B) increasing investment through use of research and development or procurement activities and acquisition authorities to— (i) expand production capacity; (ii) diversify sources of supply; or (iii) promote alternative approaches for addressing military requirements; (C) prohibiting procurement from selected sources or nations; (D) taking a combination of actions described under subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C); or (E) taking no action. (2) Considerations The analyses conducted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall consider national security, economic, and treaty implications, as well as impacts on current and potential suppliers of goods and services. (b) Reporting on analyses, recommendations, and actions (1) Briefing required Not later than January 15, 2025, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees, in writing— (A) a summary of the findings of the analyses undertaken for each item pursuant to subsection (a); (B) relevant recommendations resulting from the analyses; and (C) descriptions of specific activities undertaken as a result of the analyses, including schedule and resources allocated for any planned actions. (2) Reporting The Secretary of Defense shall include the analyses conducted under subsection (a), and any relevant recommendations and descriptions of activities resulting from such analyses, as appropriate, in each of the following during the 2025 calendar year: (A) The annual report or quarterly briefings to Congress required under section 4814 of title 10, United States Code. (B) The annual report on unfunded priorities of the national technology and industrial base required under section 4815 of such title. (C) Department of Defense technology and industrial base policy guidance prescribed under section 4811(c) of such title. (D) Activities to modernize acquisition processes to ensure the integrity of the industrial base pursuant to section 4819 of such title. (E) Defense memoranda of understanding and related agreements considered in accordance with section 4851 of such title. (F) Industrial base or acquisition policy changes. (G) Legislative proposals for changes to relevant statutes which the Department shall consider, develop, and submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives not less frequently than once per fiscal year. (H) Other actions as the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate. (c) List of goods and services for analyses, recommendations, and actions The items described in this subsection are the following: (1) Traveling Wave Tubes and Traveling Wave Tube Amplifiers. 834. Pilot program on capital assistance to support defense investment in the industrial base (a) In general The Secretary of Defense may carry out a pilot program under this section to use capital assistance to support the duties and elements of sections 901 and 907. (b) Eligibility and application process (1) In general An eligible entity seeking capital assistance for an eligible investment under this section shall submit to the Secretary of Defense an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require. (2) Selection of investments The Secretary shall establish criteria for selecting among eligible investments for which applications are submitted under subsection (c)(2). The criteria shall include— (A) the extent to which an investment supports the national security of the United States; (B) the likelihood that capital assistance provided for an investment would enable the investment to proceed sooner than the investment would otherwise be able to proceed; and (C) the creditworthiness of an investment. (c) Capital assistance (1) Loans and loan guarantees (A) In general The Secretary may provide loans or loan guarantees to finance or refinance the costs of an eligible investment selected pursuant to subsection (b)(2). (B) Administration of loans (i) Interest rate (I) In general Except as provided under subclause (II), the interest rate on a loan provided under subparagraph (A) shall be not less than the yield on marketable United States Treasury securities of a similar maturity to the maturity of the loan on the date of execution of the loan agreement. (II) Exception The Secretary may waive the requirement under subclause (I) with respect to an investment if the investment is determined by the Secretary of Defense to be vital to the national security of the United States. (III) Criteria The Secretary shall establish separate and distinct criteria for interest rates for loan guarantees with private sector lending institutions. (ii) Final maturity date The final maturity date of a loan provided under subparagraph (A) shall be not later than 50 years after the date of substantial completion of the investment for which the loan was provided. (iii) Prepayment A loan provided under subparagraph (A) may be paid earlier than is provided for under the loan agreement without a penalty. (iv) Nonsubordination (I) In general A loan provided under subparagraph (A) shall not be subordinated to the claims of any holder of investment obligations in the event of bankruptcy, insolvency, or liquidation of the obligor. (II) Exception The Secretary may waive the requirement under subclause (I) with respect to the investment in order to mitigate risks to loan repayment. (v) Sale of loans The Secretary may sell to another entity or reoffer into the capital markets a loan provided under subparagraph (A) if the Secretary determines that the sale or reoffering can be made on favorable terms. (vi) Loan guarantees Any loan guarantee provided under subparagraph (A) shall specify the percentage of the principal amount guaranteed. If the Secretary determines that the holder of a loan guaranteed by the Department of Defense defaults on the loan, the Secretary shall pay the holder as specified in the loan guarantee agreement. (vii) Investment-grade rating The Secretary shall establish a credit rating system to ensure a reasonable reassurance of repayment. The system may include use of existing credit rating agencies where appropriate. (viii) Terms and conditions Loans and loan guarantees provided under subparagraph (A) shall be subject to such other terms and conditions and contain such other covenants, representations, warranties, and requirements (including requirements for audits) as the Secretary determines appropriate. (ix) Applicability of Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 Loans and loan guarantees provided under subparagraph (A) shall be subject to the requirements of the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 ( 2 U.S.C. 661 et seq. (2) Equity investments (A) In general The Secretary may, as a minority investor, support an eligible investment selected pursuant to subsection (b)(2) with funds or use other mechanisms for the purpose of purchasing, and may make and fund commitments to purchase, invest in, make pledges in respect of, or otherwise acquire, equity or quasi-equity securities (such as warrants), or shares or financial interests of the eligible entity receiving support for the eligible investment, including as a limited partner or other investor in investment funds, upon such terms and conditions as the Secretary may determine. (B) Sales and liquidation of position The Secretary shall seek to sell and liquidate any support for an investment provided under subparagraph (A) as soon as commercially feasible, commensurate with other similar investors in the investment and taking into consideration the national security interests of the United States. (3) Technical assistance Subjection to Appropriations acts, the Secretary may provide technical assistance with respect to developing and financing investments to eligible entities seeking capital assistance for eligible investments and eligible entities receiving capital assistance under this section. (4) Terms and conditions (A) Amount of capital assistance The Secretary shall provide to an eligible investment selected pursuant to subsection (b)(2) the amount of assistance necessary to carry out the investment. (B) Use of United States dollars All financial transactions conducted under this section shall be conducted in United States dollars. (d) Establishment of accounts (1) Credit program account (A) Establishment There is established in the Treasury of the United States a Department of Defense Credit Program Account to execute loans and loan guarantees in accordance with section 502 of the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 ( 2 U.S.C. 661a (B) Funding The Credit Program Account shall consist of amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations and fees collected pursuant to subparagraph (C). (C) Fee authority The Secretary may charge and collect fees for providing capital assistance in amounts to be determined by the Secretary. The Secretary shall establish the amount of such fees in regulations at an amount sufficient to cover but not exceed the administrative costs to the Office of providing capital assistance. (2) Equity account (A) Establishment There is established in the Treasury of the United States a Department of Defense Strategic Capital Equity Account. (B) Funding The Strategic Capital Equity Account shall consist of all amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations. (3) Use of funds Subject to appropriations Acts, the Secretary is authorized to pay, from the Department of Defense Credit Program Account or the Department of Defense Strategic Capital Equity Account— (A) the cost, as defined in section 502 of the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 ( 2 U.S.C. 661a (B) administrative expenses associated with activities under this section; (C) project-specific transaction costs; (D) the cost of providing support authorized by this section; and (E) the costs of equity investments. (e) Regulations The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe such regulations as are necessary to carry out this section. The Secretary may not exercise the authorities available under this section until such time as these regulations have been issued and adopted by the Department. (f) Annual report Not later than the first Monday in February of a fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an annual report describing activities carried out pursuant to this section in the preceding fiscal year and the goals of the Department of Defense in accordance with this section for the next fiscal year. (g) Notification requirement The Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees not later than 30 days after a use of loans, loan guarantees, equity investments, insurance, or reinsurance under this section. (h) Sunset The authorities provided under this section shall expire on October 1, 2028. (i) Definitions In this section: (1) Capital assistance The term capital assistance (2) Eligible entity The term eligible entity (A) an individual; (B) a corporation, including a limited liability corporation; (C) a partnership, including a public-private, limited, or general partnership; (D) a joint venture, including a strategic alliance; (E) a trust; (F) a State of the United States, including a political subdivision or any other instrumentality of a State; (G) a Tribal government or consortium of Tribal governments; (H) any other governmental entity or public agency in the United States, including a special purpose district or public authority, including a port authority; or (I) a multi-State or multi-jurisdictional group of public entities within the United States. (3) Eligible investment The term eligible investment (A) to identify, accelerate, and sustain the establishment, research, development, construction, procurement, leasing, consolidation, alteration, improvement, or repair of tangible and intangible assets vital to national security; or (B) to protect vital tangible and intangible assets from theft, acquisition, and transfer by adversaries of the United States. (4) Obligor The term obligor 835. Requirement to buy certain satellite components from national technology and industrial base (a) In general Section 4864(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (6) Traveling-wave tube and traveling wave tube amplifiers A traveling-wave tube and traveling wave tube amplifier, that meets established technical and reliability requirements, used in a satellite weighing more than 400 pounds whose principle purpose is to support the national security, defense, or intelligence needs of the United States Government. . (b) Exception Paragraph (6) of section 4864(a) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall not apply with respect to programs that received Milestone A approval (as defined in section 2431a of such title) before October 1, 2022. (c) Clarification of delegation authority Subject to subsection (i) of section 4864 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense may delegate to a service acquisition executive the authority to make a waiver under subsection (d) of such section with respect to the limitation under subsection (a)(6) of such section, as added by subsection (a) of this section. D Small business matters 841. Amendments to Defense Research and Development Rapid Innovation Program Section 4061 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) by inserting to enable and assist small businesses merit-based program (ii) by striking fielding of technologies commercialization of various technologies, including critical technologies (iii) by inserting capabilities developed through competitively awarded prototype agreements defense laboratories, (B) in paragraph (2), by inserting support full-scale integration, evaluation outcomes, (2) in subsection (b)— (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting primarily major defense acquisition programs, but also other candidate proposals in support of (B) in paragraph (2), by striking by each military department by each component small business office of each military department (3) in subsection (d)(2), by striking $3,000,000 $6,000,000 842. Department of Defense Mentor-Protégé Program Section 4902(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (D) as clauses (i) through (iv), respectively; (2) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively; (3) by striking Before providing assistance (1) Before providing assistance (4) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) An agreement under this subsection may be a contract, cooperative agreement, or a partnership intermediary agreement. . 843. Consideration of the past performance of affiliate companies of small businesses Not later than July 1, 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall amend section 215.305 of the Defense Federal Acquisition Supplement (or any successor regulation) to require that when small business concerns bid on Department of Defense contracts, the past performance evaluation and source selection processes shall consider, if relevant, the past performance information of affiliate companies of the small business concerns. 844. Timely payments for Department of Defense small business subcontractors (a) Reduction in time for contractor explanation and past performance consideration of unjustified withholding of payments to Department of Defense small business subcontractors Section 8(d)(13)(B)(i) of the Small Business Act ( 15 U.S.C. 637(d)(13)(B)(i) , or, for a covered contract awarded by the Department of Defense, more than 30 days past due, 90 days past due (b) Clarification that contracting officers of the Department of Defense are authorized to enter or modify past performance information related to unjustified non-payment or reduced payment before or after contract close-out Section 8(d)(13)(C) of the Small Business Act ( 15 U.S.C. 637(d)(13)(C) (1) by striking A contracting officer (i) In general A contracting officer ; and (2) by adding at the end the following: (ii) Past performance information for DOD contracts The contracting officer for a covered contract awarded by the Department of Defense may enter or modify past performance information of the prime contractor in connection with the unjustified failure to make a full or timely payment to a subcontractor before or after close-out of the covered contract. . (c) Duty of cooperation to correct and mitigate unjustified failure by Department of Defense prime contractors to make full or timely payments to subcontractors Section 8(d)(13) of the Small Business Act ( 15 U.S.C. 637(d)(13) (1) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (F); (2) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following: (E) Cooperation on DOD contracts (i) In general If a contracting officer of the Department of Defense determines, with respect to a prime contractor’s past performance, that there was an unjustified failure by the prime contractor on a covered contract awarded by the Department of Defense to make a full or timely payment to a subcontractor covered by subparagraph (B) or (C), such prime contractor is required to cooperate with the contracting officer, who shall consult with the Director of Small Business Programs or Director of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization acting pursuant to section 15(k)(6) and other representatives of the Department of Defense, with regards to correcting and mitigating such unjustified failure to make a full or timely payment to the subcontractor. (ii) Period The duty of cooperation under this subparagraph continues until the subcontractor is made whole or the contracting officer’s determination is no longer effective, and regardless of performance or close-out status of the covered contract. ; and (3) in subparagraph (D), by striking subparagraph (E) subparagraph (F) (d) Applicability The amendments made by this section shall apply to any covered contract (as defined in section 8(d)(13)(A) of the Small Business Act ( 15 U.S.C. 637(d)(13)(A) 845. Extension of Pilot Program for streamlined technology transition from the SBIR and STTR Programs of the Department of Defense Section 1710(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 September 30, 2023 September 30, 2028 846. Annual reports regarding the SBIR program of the Department of Defense Section 279(a) of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 ( Public Law 116–283 each fiscal years 2021, 2022, and 2023 each fiscal year through fiscal year 2028 847. Modifications to the Procurement Technical Assistance Program (a) Definitions Section 4951 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)(C), by striking private, nonprofit organization nonprofit organization (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (5) The term business entity . (b) Cooperative agreements Section 4954 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (b)— (A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as subparagraphs (A) and (B); (B) by inserting (1) Under (C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) The Secretary shall have the ability to waive or modify the percentages specified in paragraph (1), on a case-by-case basis, if the Secretary determines that it would be in the best interest of the program. ; (2) by striking subsection (c) and redesignating subsections (d), (e), and (f) as subsections (e), (f), and (h); and (3) by inserting after subsection (f), as redesignated by paragraph (2), the following new subsection: (g) Waiver of Government cost share restriction If the Secretary of Defense determines it to be in the best interests of the Federal Government, the Secretary may waive the restrictions on the percentage of eligible costs covered by the program under section (b). The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a written justification for such determination. . (c) Authority to provide certain types of technical assistance Section 4958(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ; and (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (3) under clause 252.204-7012 of the Defense Acquisition Regulation Supplement, or any successor regulation, and on compliance with those requirements (and any successor requirements); and (4) under section 847 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 . 848. Extension of pilot program to incentivize contracting with employee-owned businesses Section 874 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 10 U.S.C. 3204 (1) in subsection (b)— (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting and prescribe regulations establish a pilot program (B) in paragraph (3), by striking A qualified Each contract held by a qualified (2) in subsection (c)(2), by striking expended on subcontracts, subject to such necessary and reasonable waivers (A) to the extent subcontracted amounts exceeding 50 percent are subcontracted to other qualified businesses wholly-owned through an Employee Stock Ownership Plan; (B) in the case of contracts for products, to the extent subcontracted amounts exceeding 50 percent are for materials not available from another qualified business wholly-owned through an Employee Stock Ownership Plan; or (C) pursuant to such necessary and reasonable waivers ; and (3) in subsection (e), by striking five years after eight years after E Other matters 861. Limitation on the availability of funds pending a plan for implementing the replacement for the Selected Acquisition Reporting system Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide, for travel for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, not more than 85 percent may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a plan for implementing the replacement for the Selected Acquisition Reporting system as required by section 809 of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 (1) a timeline and process for implementing the requirements of such section 809; (2) a timeline and process for implementing quarterly reporting versus annually for the replacement system, including identification of policy, procedural, or technical challenges to implementing that reporting periodicity; (3) a timeline and process for providing access to the replacement reporting system to congressional staff; and (4) a timeline and process for providing access to the replacement reporting system to the Government Accountability Office, the public, and other relevant stakeholders. 862. Extension of pilot program for distribution support and services for weapons systems contractors Section 883 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 10 U.S.C. 4292 (1) in subsection (a), by striking seven-year pilot program eight-year pilot program (2) in subsection (g), by striking seven years eight years 863. Modification of effective date for expansion on the prohibition on acquiring certain metal products Section 844(b) of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 ( Public Law 116–283 5 years 6 years 864. Foreign sources of specialty metals Section 4863(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively; (2) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively; (3) by inserting (1) Subsection (a)(1) (4) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) Any specialty metal procured as mill product or incorporated into a component other than an end item pursuant to this subsection shall be melted or produced— (A) in the United States; (B) in the country from which the mill product or component is procured; or (C) in another country covered under paragraph (1)(A)(ii). . 865. University Affiliated Research Center for critical minerals (a) Plan to establish a university affiliated research center for critical minerals (1) In general The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, shall develop a plan to establish a new University Affiliated Research Center (UARC), or to expand a current relevant UARC or consortia of universities, for the purposes of contributing to the capacity of the Department to conduct research, development, engineering or workforce expansion related to critical minerals for national security needs. The plan should focus on institutional capacity at a mining school or schools with expertise in engineering, applied research, commercial and workforce development activities related to critical minerals. (2) Elements The plan required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An assessment of the engineering, applied research, commercialization, and workforce development capabilities relating to critical minerals of mining schools, including an assessment of the workforce and physical research infrastructure of such schools. (B) An assessment of the ability of mining schools— (i) to participate in defense-related engineering, applied research, commercialization, and workforce development activities relating to critical minerals; (ii) to effectively compete for defense-related engineering, applied research, commercialization, and workforce development contracts and grants; and (iii) to support the mission of the Under Secretary to extend the capabilities of current war fighting systems, develop breakthrough capabilities, hedge against an uncertain future through a set of scientific and engineering options, and counter strategic surprise. (C) An assessment of the activities and investments necessary— (i) to augment facilities or educational programming at mining schools or a consortium of mining schools— (I) to support the mission of the Under Secretary; (II) to access, secure, and conduct research relating to sensitive or classified information; and (III) to respond quickly to emerging engineering, applied research, commercialization, and workforce needs relating to critical minerals. (ii) to increase the participation of mining schools in defense-related engineering, applied research, commercialization, and workforce development activities; and (iii) to increase the ability of mining schools to effectively compete for defense-related engineering, applied research, commercialization, and workforce development contracts and grants. (D) Recommendations identifying actions that may be taken by the Secretary, the Under Secretary, Congress, mining schools, and other organizations to increase the participation of mining schools in defense-related engineering, applied research, commercialization, and workforce development activities, contracts, and grants. (E) The specific goals, incentives, and metrics developed by the Secretary under subparagraph (D) to increase and measure the capacity of mining schools to address the engineering, applied research, commercialization, and workforce development needs of the Department of Defense. (3) Consultations In developing the plan required by paragraph (1), the Secretary and the Under Secretary shall consult with such other public and private sector organizations as the Secretary and the Under Secretary determine appropriate. (4) Report required Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall— (A) submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the plan developed under paragraph (1); and (B) make the plan available on a publicly accessible website of the Department of Defense. (b) Activities to support the engineering, applied research, commercialization, and workforce development capacity of mining schools (1) In general Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Under Secretary may establish a program to award contracts, grants, or other agreements on a competitive basis, and to perform other appropriate activities, for the purposes described in paragraph (2). (2) Purposes The purposes described in this paragraph are the following: (A) Developing the capability, including workforce and research infrastructure, for mining schools to more effectively compete for Federal engineering, applied research, commercialization, and workforce development funding opportunities. (B) Improving the capability of mining schools to recruit and retain research faculty, and to participate in appropriate personnel exchange programs and educational and career development activities. (C) Any other purposes the Under Secretary determines appropriate for enhancing the defense-related engineering, applied research, commercialization, and development capabilities of mining schools. (c) Increasing partnerships for mining schools with national security research and engineering organizations (1) In general Chapter 305 4145. Research and educational programs and activities: critical minerals (a) Program established (1) In general The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and the Secretary of each military department, shall carry out a program to provide assistance to covered educational institutions to assist the Department of Defense in defense-related critical minerals engineering, applied research, commercialization, and workforce development activities. (2) Limitation on delegation The Secretary of Defense may not delegate or transfer to an individual outside the Office of the Secretary of Defense the authority regarding the programming or budgeting of the program established by this section that is carried out by the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. (b) Program objective The objective of the program established by subsection (a)(1) is to enhance defense-related critical minerals research and education at covered educational institutions. Such objective shall be accomplished through initiatives designed to— (1) enhance the critical minerals research and educational capabilities of such institutions in areas of importance to national defense, as determined by the Secretary; (2) encourage the participation of such institutions in the research, development, testing, and evaluation programs and activities of the Department of Defense relating to critical minerals; (3) increase the number of graduates from such institutions engaged in critical minerals-related disciplines important to the national security functions of the Department of Defense, as determined by the Secretary; and (4) encourage research and educational collaborations between such institutions and other institutions of higher education, Government defense organizations, and the defense industry relating to critical minerals. (c) Assistance provided Under the program established under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary of Defense may provide covered educational institutions with funding or technical assistance, including any of the following: (1) Support for research, development, testing, evaluation, or educational enhancements in areas important to national defense through the competitive awarding of grants, cooperative agreements, contracts, scholarships, fellowships, or the acquisition of research equipment or instrumentation. (2) Support to assist in the attraction and retention of faculty in scientific disciplines important to the national security functions of the Department of Defense. (3) Establishing partnerships between such institutions and defense laboratories, Government defense organizations, the defense industry, and other institutions of higher education in research, development, testing, and evaluation in areas important to the national security functions of the Department of Defense. (4) Other such non-monetary assistance as the Secretary finds appropriate to enhance defense-related research, development, testing, and evaluation activities at such institutions. (d) Incentives (1) In general The Secretary of Defense may develop incentives to encourage critical minerals-related research and educational collaborations between covered educational institutions and other institutions of higher education. (2) Goals The Secretary of Defense shall establish goals and incentives to encourage Federally funded research and development centers, science and technology reinvention laboratories, and University Affiliated Research Centers funded by the Department of Defense— (A) to assess the capacity of covered educational institutions to address the critical minerals research and development needs of the Department through partnerships and collaborations; and (B) if appropriate, to enter into partnerships and collaborations with such institutions. (e) Criteria for funding The Secretary of Defense may establish procedures under which the Secretary may limit funding under this section to institutions that have not otherwise received a significant amount of funding from the Department of Defense for research, development, testing, and evaluation programs supporting the national security functions of the Department. (f) Definition of covered educational institution (1) In general In this section, the term covered educational institution (A) a mining, metallurgical, geological, or mineral engineering program— (i) accredited by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc.; and (ii) located at an institution of higher education; or (B) an institution of higher learning or community college with a geology or engineering program or department that has experience in mining research or work with the mining industry. (2) Institution of higher education For purposes of paragraph (1), the term institution of higher education 20 U.S.C. 1001 . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 305 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 4145. Research and educational programs and activities: critical minerals. . (d) Mining school defined (1) In general In this section, the term mining school (A) a mining, metallurgical, geological, or mineral engineering program— (i) accredited by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc.; and (ii) located at an institution of higher education; or (B) an institution of higher learning or community college with a geology or engineering program or department that has experience in mining research or work with the mining industry. (2) Institution of higher education For purposes of paragraph (1), the term institution of higher education 20 U.S.C. 1001 IX DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT A Office of the Secretary of Defense and Related Matters 901. Establishment of Office of Strategic Capital (a) In general Chapter 4 148. Office of Strategic Capital (a) Establishment There is in the Office of the Secretary of Defense an office to be known as the Office of Strategic Capital (in this section referred to as the Office (b) Director The Office shall be headed by a Director (in this section referred to as the Director (c) Duties The Office shall— (1) develop, integrate, and implement proven capital strategies of partners of the Department of Defense to shape and scale investment in critical technologies and assets; (2) identify and prioritize promising critical technologies and assets for the Department in need of capital assistance; and (3) fund investments in such technologies and assets, including supply chain technologies not always supported through direct investment. (d) Applications An eligible entity seeking capital assistance for an eligible investment shall submit to the Director an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Director may require. (e) Selection of investments (1) In general The Director shall establish criteria for selecting among eligible investments for which applications are submitted under subsection (d). Such criteria shall include— (A) the extent to which an investment is significant to the national security of the United States; (B) the likelihood that capital assistance provided for an investment would enable the investment to proceed sooner than the investment would otherwise be able to proceed; and (C) the creditworthiness of an investment. (2) Notice and wait requirement The criteria established under paragraph (1) shall not apply until— (A) the Secretary of Defense submits the criteria to the congressional defense committees; and (B) a period of 30 days has elapsed after such submission. (f) Notification Not less than 30 days before exercising the authority provided by section 834 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, the Director, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment and the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, shall notify the congressional defense committees of the purpose and terms of any capital assistance proposed to be provided under that section. Such notification may be made in classified form, if necessary. (g) Strategic Capital Advisory Board The Secretary of Defense shall establish a Strategic Capital Advisory Board to advise the Director with respect to activities carried out under this section. (h) Regulations The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as are necessary to carry out this section, including regulations to ensure internal and external coordination to avoid duplication of effort, reduce inefficiency, and ensure policy coherence across the Department. (i) Effective date The authorities made available under this section may not be exercised until the date that is 30 days after the regulations required by subsection (i) have been— (1) prescribed and adopted by the Department; and (2) submitted to the congressional defense committees. (j) Annual report Not later than December 31 of each year, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that— (1) describes the activities of the Office during the most recent fiscal year ending before submission of the report, including— (A) an identification of entities that received capital assistance from the Office during that fiscal year; (B) a description of the status of the financial obligations of those entities as a result of receiving such assistance; and (C) any success stories as a result of such assistance; (2) assesses the status of the finances of the Office as of the end of that fiscal year; and (3) describes the goals of the Office for the fiscal year that begins after submission of the report. (k) Definitions In this section: (1) Capital assistance The term capital assistance (2) Eligible entity The term eligible entity (A) an individual; (B) a corporation; (C) a partnership, including a public-private partnership; (D) a joint venture; (E) a trust; (F) a State, including a political subdivision or any other instrumentality of a State; (G) a Tribal government or consortium of Tribal governments; (H) any other governmental entity or public agency in the United States, including a special purpose district or public authority, including a port authority; or (I) a multi-State or multi-jurisdictional group of public entities. (3) Eligible investment The term eligible investment (A) to identify, accelerate, and sustain the establishment, research, development, construction, procurement, leasing, consolidation, alteration, improvement, or repair of tangible and intangible assets vital to United States national security; or (B) to protect tangible and intangible assets vital to United States national security from theft, acquisition, and transfer by countries that are adversaries of the United States. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 4 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 148. Office of Strategic Capital. . 902. Reinstatement of position of Chief Management Officer of Department of Defense (a) Reinstatement of position (1) In general Chapter 4 section 132 132a. Chief Management Officer (a) Appointment and qualifications (1) There is a Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. (2) The Chief Management Officer shall be appointed from among persons who have an extensive management or business background and experience with managing large or complex organizations. A person may not be appointed as Chief Management Officer within seven years after relief from active duty as a commissioned officer of a regular component of an armed force. (b) Responsibilities Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Chief Management Officer shall perform such duties and exercise such powers as the Secretary or the Deputy Secretary may prescribe, including the following: (1) Serving as the chief management officer of the Department of Defense with the mission of managing enterprise business operations and shared services of the Department of Defense. (2) Serving as the principal advisor to the Secretary and the Deputy Secretary on establishing policies for, and directing, all enterprise business operations of the Department, including planning and processes, business transformation, and performance measurement and management activities and programs, including the allocation of resources for enterprise business operations and unifying business management efforts across the Department. (3) Exercising authority, direction, and control over the Defense Agencies and Department of Defense Field Activities providing shared business services for the Department. (4) Authority to direct the Secretaries of the military departments and the heads of all other elements of the Department with regard to matters for which the Chief Management Officer has responsibility under this section. (5) Serving as the official with principal responsibility in the Department for minimizing the duplication of efforts, maximizing efficiency and effectiveness, and establishing metrics for performance among and for all organizations and elements of the Department. (c) Budget authority (1) (A) Beginning in fiscal year 2025, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), shall require the head of each Defense Agency and Department of Defense Field Activity (other than such agencies and activities that are under the direction of the Director of National Intelligence or are elements of the intelligence community) to transmit the proposed budget of such Agency or Activity for enterprise business operations for a fiscal year, and for the period covered by the future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of this title for that fiscal year, to the Chief Management Officer for review under subparagraph (B) at the same time the proposed budget is submitted to the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller). (B) The Chief Management Officer shall review each proposed budget transmitted under subparagraph (A) and, not later than January 31 of the year preceding the fiscal year for which the budget is proposed, shall submit to the Secretary a report containing the comments of the Chief Management Officer with respect to all such proposed budgets, together with the certification of the Chief Management Officer regarding whether each such proposed budget achieves the required level of efficiency and effectiveness for enterprise business operations, consistent with guidance for budget review established by the Chief Management Officer. (C) Not later than March 31 each year, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that includes the following: (i) Each proposed budget for the enterprise business operations of a Defense Agency or Department of Defense Field Activity that was transmitted to the Chief Management Officer under subparagraph (A). (ii) Identification of each proposed budget contained in the most recent report submitted under subparagraph (B) that the Chief Management Officer did not certify as achieving the required level of efficiency and effectiveness for enterprise business operations. (iii) A discussion of the actions that the Secretary proposes to take, together with any recommended legislation that the Secretary considers appropriate, to address inadequate levels of efficiency and effectiveness for enterprise business operations achieved by the proposed budgets identified in the report. (iv) Any additional comments that the Secretary considers appropriate regarding inadequate levels of efficiency and effectiveness for enterprise business operations achieved by the proposed budgets. (2) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to modify or interfere with the budget-related responsibilities of the Director of National Intelligence. (d) Precedence The Chief Management Officer takes precedence in the Department of Defense after the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense. (e) Enterprise business operation defined In this section, the term enterprise business operations . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 4 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 132 the following new item: 132a. Chief Management Officer. . (b) Management and oversight of defense business systems Section 2222 of such title is amended— (1) in subsection (c)(2), by striking the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense (2) in subsection (e)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking the Chief Information Officer the Chief Management Officer (B) in paragraph (6)— (i) in subparagraph (A), in the matter preceding clause (i)— (I) in the first sentence, by striking The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, in coordination with the Chief Data and Artificial Intelligence Officer, The Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense (II) in the second sentence, by striking the Chief Information Officer shall the Chief Management Officer shall (ii) in subparagraph (B), in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking The Chief Information Officer The Chief Management Officer (3) in subsection (f)(1), in the second sentence, by inserting the Chief Management Officer and chaired by (4) in subsection (g)(2), by striking the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense (5) in subsection (i)(5)(B), by striking the Chief Information Officer the Chief Management Officer (c) Conforming amendment Section 131(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2): (2) The Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense. . (d) Guidance required Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall— (1) issue guidance to clearly delineate the authorities and responsibilities of the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense; and (2) provide a charter for the position of the Chief Management Officer to fully vest the authority of the Chief Management Officer within the Department of Defense. (e) Report on effect of lapse in management oversight on defense business systems (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Deputy Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the effect on defense business systems of the abolishment of the position of Chief Management Officer and the failure to reassign the responsibilities of the Chief Management Officer with respect to defense business systems for two years. (2) Defense business system defined In this subsection, the term defense business system 903. Modification of responsibilities of Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (a) In general Subsection (d) of section 139a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (5)— (A) by striking , ensuring and ensuring (B) by striking , and assessing economy (2) in paragraph (8), by inserting after defense resources , including the standardization of analytical methodologies and the establishment and maintenance of a centralized knowledge repository of physical attributes or other data for modeling and simulation purposes (b) Annual reports Such section is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (e) Annual reports (1) In general Not later than February 1, 2024, and annually thereafter, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on activities to conduct strategic and operational analysis under paragraphs (2), (3), (6), (7), and (8) of subsection (d) that includes— (A) a review of strategic portfolio reviews completed in the fiscal year preceding submission of the report and a description of such reviews planned for the fiscal year that begins after submission of the report; (B) a review of analyses of alternatives completed in the fiscal year preceding submission of the report and a description of such analyses planned for the fiscal year that begins after submission of the report; and (C) a review of defense program projections completed in the fiscal year preceding submission of the report and a description of such projections planned for the fiscal year that begins after submission of the report. (2) Form Each report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in classified form, but shall include an unclassified summary. (3) Briefings Not later than 15 days after submission of each report required by paragraph (1), the Director shall brief the congressional defense committees on the contents of the report. . (c) Program evaluation competitive analysis cell Such section is further amended by adding after subsection (e), as added by subsection (b), the following new subsection: (f) Program evaluation competitive analysis cell (1) In general Not later than June 1, 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall— (A) establish a team, to be known as the Program Evaluation Competitive Analysis Cell (B) ensure that the team has a sufficient number of personnel to carry out the duties of the team. (2) Independence The Program Evaluation Competitive Analysis Cell shall be independent of the Director and shall report only to the Secretary of Defense. . (d) Pilot program on alternative analysis (1) In general The Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall establish a pilot program on alternative analysis. (2) Structure The Director shall establish, under the pilot program established under paragraph (1), three analytical groups, focused on programmatic analysis in the following: (A) Year 1 of the future-years defense program under section 221 of title 10, United States Code. (B) Years 2 through 5 of the future-years defense program. (C) Years outside the future-years defense program. (3) Requirements The pilot program established under paragraph (1) shall run at least one strategic portfolio review or equivalent analytical effort per year. (e) Establishment of Analysis Working Group (1) In general Not later than May 1, 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall— (A) establish the Analysis Working Group in the Department of Defense; and (B) ensure that the Analysis Working Group possesses sufficient full-time equivalent support personnel to carry out the duties of the Group. (2) Membership The Analysis Working Group shall be composed of representatives of the following components of the Department of Defense: (A) The Office of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. (B) The Directorate for Joint Force Development (J7) of the Joint Staff. (C) The Directorate for Force Structure, Resources, and Assessment (J8) of the Joint Staff. (D) The Office of the Secretary of Defense for Policy. (E) The Chief Data and Artificial Intelligence Office. (F) The Office of the Chief Information Officer. (G) The United States Indo-Pacific Command. (H) The United States European Command. (3) Duties The Analysis Working Group shall— (A) establish clear priorities and standards to focus analysts on decision support; (B) improve transparency of methodologies, tools, and tradecraft across the analytic community, including testing and validation for new or emerging methodologies, tools, and tradecraft; (C) improve quality of and expand access to data, including evaluation of new data sets, or application of existing data sets in new or novel ways; (D) evolve the methodologies, tools, and tradecraft methods and tools used in strategic analysis; (E) resolve classified access and infrastructure challenges; (F) foster a workforce and organizations that are innovative, creative, and provide high-quality strategic decision support; and (G) conduct such other tasks as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate. (f) Rule of construction Nothing in this section shall be construed to interfere with the requirements of the Chiefs of Staff of the Armed Forces to establish military requirements, performance requirements, and joint performance requirements, or the requirement of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council to validate such requirements under section 181 of title 10, United States Code. 904. Roles and responsibilities for components of Office of Secretary of Defense for joint all-domain command and control in support of integrated joint warfighting (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall establish the roles and responsibilities of components of the Office of the Secretary of Defense for development and delivery to combatant commands of capabilities that are essential to integrated joint warfighting capabilities, as follows: (1) The Deputy Chief Technology Officer for Mission Capabilities of the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering shall be responsible for— (A) identifying new technology and operational concepts for experimentation and prototyping for delivery to the Joint Force to address key operational challenges; (B) providing technical support for the Joint Force in exploring and analyzing new capabilities, operational concepts, and systems-of-systems composition, including through advanced modeling and simulation; and (C) executing associated experimentation, through the Rapid Defense Experimentation Reserve (RDER) or another mechanism. (2) The Executive Director for Acquisition, Integration, and Interoperability of the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall be responsible for— (A) enabling the acquisition of cross-domain, joint, and cross-system kill chains and mission capabilities, including resourcing of modifications necessary for integration and interoperability among kill chain and mission components; and (B) ensuring the effectiveness of cross-domain, joint, and cross-system kill chains and mission capabilities through analysis and testing. (3) The Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer shall be responsible for creating and operating a factory-based approach for software development that allows for iterative, secure, and continuous deployment of developmental, prototype, and operational tools and capabilities from multiple vendors to test networks and operational networks for combatant commanders to— (A) gain operational awareness, make decisions, and take actions; (B) integrate relevant data sources to support target selection, target prioritization, and weapon-target pairing; and (C) prosecute targets through military service and combat support agency networks, tools, and systems. (b) Coordination The officials referred to in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (a) shall coordinate and align their plans and activities to implement subsection (a) among themselves and with the combatant commanders. (c) Initial prioritization In developing an initial set of capabilities described in subsection (a), the officials referred to in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of that subsection shall prioritize the requirements of the United States Indo-Pacific Command. (d) Briefings required Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 180 days thereafter through December 31, 2026, the officials referred to in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (a) shall provide briefings to the congressional defense committees on their plans and activities to implement subsection (a). (e) Report required Not later than March 1, 2024, the Chief Data and Artificial Intelligence Officer, in consultation with the Deputy Chief Technology Officer for Mission Capabilities of the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and the Executive Director for Acquisition, Integration, and Interoperability of the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes— (1) a plan and associated timelines for deploying and demonstrating a joint data integration layer prototype in the United States Indo-Pacific Command area of operations; (2) a plan and associated timelines for transitioning such a prototype, upon its successful demonstration, to fielding as soon as practicable given the urgent need for a joint all-domain command and control (commonly referred to as JADC2 (3) a plan and associated timelines for reaching initial operational capability for a joint data integration layer within the United States Indo-Pacific Command area of operations; (4) a plan and associated timelines for scaling that capability to future areas of operation across the combatant commands; (5) an assessment of the required type and number of personnel at the United States Indo-Pacific Command to enable sustained growth in JADC2 capabilities; and (6) a plan and associated timelines for— (A) identifying specific critical effects chains necessary to overcome anti-access and area denial capabilities and offensive military operations of foreign adversaries; and (B) creating, demonstrating, deploying, and sustaining such chains. 905. Principal Deputy Assistant Secretaries to support Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict The Secretary of Defense may appoint two Principal Deputy Assistant Secretaries to report to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict— (1) one of whom may be assigned to support the Assistant Secretary in the discharge of responsibilities specified in clause (i) of section 138(b)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code; and (2) one of whom may be assigned to support the Assistant Secretary in the discharge of responsibilities specified in clause (ii) of that section. 906. Modification of cross-functional team to address emerging threat relating to directed energy capabilities Section 910 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 10 U.S.C. 111 (1) in the section heading, by striking anomalous health incidents directed energy capabilities (2) in subsection (a), by striking anomalous health incidents (as defined by the Secretary) emerging directed energy capabilities, including such capabilities that could plausibly result in anomalous health incidents (as defined by the Secretary), (3) in subsection (b)— (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting to assist the Secretary of Defense shall be (B) by amending paragraph (1) to read as follows: (1) to address the threat posed by emerging directed energy capabilities, such as anti-personnel weapons, including the detection and mitigation of, and development of countermeasures for, such capabilities; ; (C) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; (D) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2): (2) to conduct necessary investigation and activities to understand the causation, attribution, mitigation, identification, and treatment for anomalous health incidents; ; and (E) in paragraph (4), as redesignated by subparagraph (C), by striking any other efforts regarding such incidents with any other efforts regarding emerging directed energy capabilities, hazards of electromagnetic radiation to personnel, and anomalous health incidents (4) in subsection (d), by striking in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and (5) in subsection (e)(2)— (A) by striking March 1, 2026 March 1, 2028 (B) by striking anomalous health incidents emerging directed energy capabilities, including such capabilities that could plausibly result in anomalous health incidents 907. Pilot program on protecting access to critical assets (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall establish a pilot program within the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment under which the Under Secretary will conduct and coordinate assessments, support industrial base decision-making, and provide mitigation measures to counter adversarial capital flows into industries or businesses of interest to the Department of Defense intended to undermine or deny— (1) the access of the United States to key capabilities; or (2) the ability of the United States to place such capabilities in physical locations necessary for national security functions. (b) Elements (1) In general Under the pilot program required by subsection (a), the Under Secretary may perform the following tasks: (A) Conduct coordinated and integrated analysis of adversarial capital flows into industries or businesses of interest to the Department of Defense. (B) Support coordination and outreach with technology scouting and acquisition elements of the Department to support the investment decision-making of those elements and consideration of how to counteract entities employing adversarial capital flows against industries or businesses described in subparagraph (A), including the employment of relevant authorities vested in other components of the Department and the Federal Government. (C) Identify, accelerate, and sustain the establishment, research, development, construction, procurement, leasing, consolidation, alteration, improvement, modernization, and repair of tangible and intangible assets vital to the national security of the United States. (D) Protect tangible and intangible assets vital to the national security of the United States from theft, acquisition, and transfer by adversaries or strategic competitors of the United States. (E) Provide capital assistance to entities engaged in investments that facilitate the efforts of the Under Secretary under subparagraphs (C) and (D) utilizing existing authorities available to the Department, such as the authority provided under section 834. (F) Experiment, prototype, test, or validate Government-developed or commercially developed analytical tools, processes, and tradecraft to improve the due diligence and investment analysis processes for the Department. (2) Use of certain financial instruments The Under Secretary may perform the tasks described in paragraph (1) using the authorities provided by section 834. (c) Coordination In establishing the pilot program required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall coordinate the activities being carried out under the pilot program with the following entities: (1) The Air Force Office of Concepts, Development, and Management. (2) The Air Force Office of Commercial and Economic Analysis. (3) The Special Operations Command. (4) The Defense Innovation Unit. (5) The Office of Strategic Capital established under section 148 of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 901. (6) Such other entities as the Secretary considers appropriate. (d) Regulations The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe such regulations as are necessary to carry out this section. (e) Effective date The Secretary may not carry out activities or exercise authorities under this section until the date that is 30 days after the date on which the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees the regulations required by subsection (d). (f) Briefing required Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary shall provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees that details implementation of the pilot program required by subsection (a). (g) Termination The pilot program required by subsection (a) shall terminate on September 30, 2028. (h) Definitions In this section: (1) Adversarial capital flow The term adversarial capital flow (A) the government of a country that is an adversary of the United States; or (B) an entity organized under the laws of, or otherwise subject to the jurisdiction of, such a country. (2) Capital assistance The term capital assistance 908. Extension of mission management pilot program Section 871 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 10 U.S.C. 191 (1) in subsection (b)— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) by striking In general In general (A) Selection Except ; and (ii) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (B) Delegation of oversight and management The Deputy Secretary of Defense may delegate one or more mission managers to oversee the selected missions and provide management around mission outcomes. ; and (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) Identification of funding For each mission selected under paragraph (1), the Deputy Secretary of Defense shall identify funding sources in detail in defense budget materials for budgets submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, with selected missions and solution detailed in materials for each budgetary item associated with a selected mission. ; (2) in subsection (c)(2)— (A) in subparagraph (E), by striking ; and (B) by redesignating subparagraph (F) as subparagraph (G); and (C) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the following new subparagraph: (F) assist the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the identification of funding that could contribute to the mission, including through existing authorized methods to realign, reprogram, or transfer funds; and ; (3) in subsection (f)(1)(A), by striking every six months thereafter until the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act annually thereafter until September 30, 2031 (4) in subsection (h), by striking terminate on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act terminate on September 30, 2031 909. Conforming amendments to carry out elimination of position of Chief Management Officer (a) Removal of references to Chief Management Officer in provisions of law relating to precedence Chapter 4 (1) in section 133a(c)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking , the Deputy Secretary of Defense, and the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense (B) in paragraph (2), by striking the Chief Management Officer, (2) in section 133b(c)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, (B) in paragraph (2), by striking the Chief Management Officer, (3) in section 137a(d), by striking the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, (4) in section 138(d), by striking the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, (b) Assignment of periodic review of Defense Agencies and Department of Defense field activities to Secretary of Defense Section 192(c) of such title is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) in subparagraph (A), in the first sentence, by striking the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense the Secretary of Defense (B) in subparagraphs (B) and (C), by striking the Chief Management Officer the Secretary (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the Chief Management Officer the Secretary (c) Assignment of responsibility for financial improvement and audit remediation to under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) Section 240b of such title is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking The Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense shall, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) shall, in consultation with the Performance Improvement Officer of the Department of Defense, (2) in subsection (b)(1)(C)(ii), by striking the Chief Management Officer the Performance Improvement Officer (d) Removal of Chief Management Officer as recipient of reports of audits by external auditors Section 240d(d)(1)(A) of such title is amended by striking and the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense (e) Conforming amendments to provisions of law related to Freedom of Information Act exemptions Such title is further amended— (1) in section 130e— (A) by striking subsection (d); (B) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections (d) and (e), respectively; and (C) in subsection (d), as so redesignated— (i) in the first sentence, by striking , or the Secretary's designee, (ii) in the second sentence, by striking , through the Office of the Director of Administration and Management (2) in section 2254a— (A) by striking subsection (c); (B) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (c); and (C) in subsection (c), as so redesignated— (i) in the first sentence, by striking , or the Secretary's designee, (ii) in the second sentence, by striking , through the Office of the Director of Administration and Management (f) Removal of Chief Management Officer as required coordinator on defense resale matters Section 631(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 10 U.S.C. 2481 , in coordination with the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, B Other Department of Defense Organization and Management Matters 921. Joint Energetics Transition Office (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall realign roles, responsibilities, and resources as necessary to establish a Joint Energetics Transition Office (in this section referred to as the Office (b) Responsibilities The Office shall— (1) develop and periodically update an energetic materials strategic plan and investment strategy to guide current and future investments in new and legacy energetic materials and technologies, including by— (A) developing or supporting the development of strategies and roadmaps, under the future-years defense program under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, and the program objective memorandum process, for energetic materials and technologies; and (B) initiating special studies or analyses to inform the program objective memorandum process; (2) coordinate and synchronize existing research, development, test, and evaluation efforts in energetic materials across the Department of Defense to identify promising new energetic materials and technologies— (A) to mature, integrate, prototype, and demonstrate novel energetic materials and technologies, including classification and characterization testing of new materials and manufacturing technologies; (B) to expedite testing, evaluation, and acquisition of energetic materials and technologies to meet the emergent needs of the Department, including the rapid integration of promising new materials and other promising energetic compounds into existing and planned weapons platforms; and (C) to identify existing or establish new prototyping demonstration venues to integrate advanced technologies that speed the maturation and deployment of future energetic materials; (3) oversee a process to expedite the qualification process for energetic materials, from discovery through integration into weapon systems, and recommend changes to laws, regulations, and policies that present barriers that extend timelines for that process; and (4) carry out such other responsibilities relating to energetic materials as the Secretary shall specify. (c) Report required The Deputy Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees— (1) not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, a report on the status of the establishment of the Office under subsection (a); and (2) not later than one year after such date of enactment, a report on the measures taken to provide the Office with the staff and resources necessary for the Office to carry out its responsibilities under subsection (b). 922. Transition of oversight responsibility for the Defense Technology Security Administration (a) Plan required Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a transition plan to realign the Defense Technology Security Administration under the authority, direction, and control of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Base Policy. (b) Submission of plan Not later than 7 days after the date on which the Secretary completes development of the plan required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit the plan to the congressional defense committees. (c) Implementation of plan Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Secretary completes development of the plan required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall realign the Defense Technology Security Administration under the authority, direction, and control of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Base Policy. 923. Integrated and authenticated access to Department of Defense systems for certain congressional staff for oversight purposes Section 1046(a) of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ; and (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) to the extent feasible, be integrated with software used by the Department of Defense Parking Management Office to validate parking requests. . 924. Integration of productivity software suites for scheduling data The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Department of Defense is capable of scheduling congressional engagements in a digitally interoperable manner by not later than February 25, 2024, either through— (1) integrating the productivity software suite of the Department of Defense with the productivity software suite of the congressional defense committees; or (2) enabling the automated transmission of scheduling data through another software solution. 925. Operationalizing audit readiness (a) Metrics required (1) In general The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall develop a set of command audit metrics that link existing audit readiness goals and metrics for the financial management community with unit leadership goals and metrics to provide operationally relevant performance measures for use by unit commanders. (2) Leveraging support In developing the metrics required by paragraph (1), the Secretary may leverage support from an existing federally funded research and development center or university-affiliated research center. (3) Deadline An initial set of metrics shall be developed and implemented under paragraph (1) not later than April 30, 2025. (b) Training (1) In general The President of the Defense Acquisition University shall develop training curricula to support the workforce of the Department of Defense in understanding, implementing, and utilizing the metrics developed under subsection (a) in the day-to-day performance of their command and leadership duties. (2) Deadline An initial training curriculum shall be developed and implemented under paragraph (1) not later than April 30, 2025. (c) Leader performance assessments (1) In general The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall evaluate means by which the metrics developed under subsection (a) can be used in the performance evaluation of unit commanders. (2) Briefing required Not later than September 30, 2024, the Secretary shall provide a briefing to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the evaluation conducted under paragraph (1). The briefing shall include the following elements: (A) Identification of the appropriate command echelon at which to assess unit leader performance using the metrics developed under subsection (a). (B) Evaluations of available measures to reward superior or above average performance with respect to such metrics. (C) Assessment of the potential value, and challenges, to integrating such measures into the annual performance evaluations for designated unit leaders. (D) Any other issues the Secretary considers appropriate. 926. Next generation business health metrics (a) Metrics required The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of Administration and Management and in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall develop an updated set of business health metrics to inform decision-making by senior leaders of the Department of Defense. (b) Elements In developing the metrics required by subsection (a), the Director shall— (1) using the current literature on performance measurement, determine what additional new metrics should be implemented, or current metrics should be adapted, to reduce output-based measures and emphasize objective, measurable indicators aligned to enduring strategic goals of the Department of Defense; (2) assess the current business processes of the Department and provide recommendations to align the metrics with available data sources to determine what gaps might exist in such processes; (3) ensure that data can be collected automatically and, on a long-term basis, in a manner that provides for longitudinal analysis; (4) link the metrics with the Strategic Management Plan and other performance documents guiding the Department; (5) identify any shortfalls in resources, data, training, policy, or law that could be an impediment to implementing the metrics; (6) revise leading and lagging indicators associated with each such metric to provide a benchmark against which to assess progress; (7) improve visualization of and comprehension for the use of the metrics in data-driven decision-making, including adoption of new policies and training as needed; (8) incorporate the ability to aggregate and disaggregate data to provide the ability to focus on functional, component-level metrics; and (9) increase standardization of the use and collection of business health metrics across the Department. (c) Additional support In developing the metrics required by subsection (a), the Director may leverage support from an existing federally funded research and development center or university-affiliated research center. (d) Briefing required Not later than January 30, 2025, the Director shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the development of the metrics required by subsection (a). 927. Independent assessment of defense business enterprise architecture (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall select a federally funded research and development center or a university affiliated research center to conduct an independent assessment of the defense business enterprise architecture developed under section 2222(e) of title 10, United States Code. (b) Elements The assessment required by subsection (a) shall include the following elements: (1) An assessment of the effectiveness of the defense business enterprise architecture as of the date of the enactment of this Act in providing an adequate and useful framework for planning, managing, and integrating the business systems of the Department of Defense. (2) A comparison of the defense business enterprise architecture with similar models in use by other government agencies in the United States, foreign governments, and major commercial entities, including an assessment of any lessons from such models that might be applied to the defense business enterprise architecture. (3) An assessment of the adequacy of the defense business enterprise architecture in informing business process reengineering and being sufficiently responsive to changes in business processes over time. (4) An identification of any shortfalls or implementation challenges in the utility of the defense business enterprise architecture. (5) Recommendations for replacement of the existing defense business enterprise architecture or for modifications to the existing architecture to make that architecture and the process for updating that architecture more effective and responsive to the business process needs of the Department. (c) Interim briefing Not later than April 1, 2024, the Secretary shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the status of the assessment required by subsection (a). (d) Final report Not later than January 30, 2025, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the results of the assessment required by subsection (a). 928. Limitation on establishment of new diversity, equity, and inclusion positions; hiring freeze (a) In general During the period described in subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may not— (1) establish any new positions within the Department of Defense with responsibility for matters relating to diversity, equity, and inclusion; or (2) fill any vacancies in positions in the Department with responsibility for such matters. (b) Period described The period described in this subsection is the period— (1) beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act; and (2) ending on the date on which the Comptroller General of the United States submits to Congress the review of the Department of Defense diversity, equity, and inclusion workforce required by the report of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate accompanying the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024. X General provisions A Financial matters 1001. General transfer authority (a) Authority To transfer authorizations (1) Authority Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this division for fiscal year 2024 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred. (2) Limitation Except as provided in paragraph (3), the total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this section may not exceed $6,000,000,000. (3) Exception for transfers between military personnel authorizations A transfer of funds between military personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be counted toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2). (b) Limitations The authority provided by subsection (a) to transfer authorizations— (1) may only be used to provide authority for items that have a higher priority than the items from which authority is transferred; and (2) may not be used to provide authority for an item that has been denied authorization by Congress. (c) Effect on authorization amounts A transfer made from one account to another under the authority of this section shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount transferred. (d) Notice to Congress The Secretary shall promptly notify Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a). 1002. Annual report on budget prioritization by Secretary of Defense and military departments (a) In general Chapter 9 section 222d 222e. Programs, projects, and activities that were internally reduced or eliminated in the submission of the President’s budget: annual report (a) In general The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Secretaries of the military departments and the officers of Department of Defense agencies and offices not under the control of a Secretary of a military department, shall submit to the congressional defense committees each year, not later than 15 days after the submission of the budget of the President for the fiscal year beginning in such year under section 1105(a) of title 31, a report that includes organized tabulations of programs, projects, and activities the total obligational authority for which was reduced or eliminated in the current budget year proposal compared to the prior-year projection for the current year. (b) Elements The tabulations required under subsection (a) shall include, for each program, project, or activity that was internally reduced or eliminated, the following elements: (1) Whether the program, project, or activity was eliminated or reduced and which fiscal year it was eliminated or reduced in. (2) Appropriations sub-account. (3) The appropriate program element, line item number, or sub-activity group. (4) Program, project, or activity name. (5) Prior year enacted appropriation. (6) Prior year projected current year budget. (7) Current year budget request. (8) If applicable, the amount reduced or saved by the current year elimination or reduction over the future years defense plan. (9) The rationale for reduction or elimination. (c) Form The report required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in machine readable, electronic form. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 9 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 222d the following new item: 222e. Programs, projects, and activities that were internally reduced or eliminated in the submission of the President’s budget: annual report. . 1003. Additional reporting requirements related to unfunded priorities Section 222a(c)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (E) For each priority— (i) the requirement that will be addressed which is not in the base budget request; (ii) the reason why the priority was not included in the base budget request; (iii) a description of previous funding to address the requirement; (iv) an assessment of the impact of the priority on the future years defense plan. . 1004. Sense of the Senate on need for emergency supplemental appropriations It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) section 101 of the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 ( Public Law 118–5 (2) if those spending limits for either category are breached, then across-the-board sequestration cuts are triggered on that category to eliminate the breach; (3) the enactment of authorization and appropriations legislation for the Department of Defense will provide inherent cost savings that continuing resolutions do not provide; (4) there are growing national security concerns that require additional funds beyond the revised security spending limit, to include continued support to the Ukrainian armed forces, additional munitions production, additional large surface combatants, shipbuilding industrial base modernization investments, submarine industrial base and supply chain management, additional production of wheeled and tracked combat vehicles, and emergent capabilities and exercises in the United States Indo-Pacific Command; (5) as the Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer stated on June 1, 2023, This debt ceiling deal does nothing to limit the Senate’s ability to appropriate emergency/supplemental funds to ensure our military capabilities are sufficient to deter China, Russia, and our other adversaries and respond to ongoing and growing national security threats, including Russia’s ongoing war of aggression against Ukraine, our ongoing competition with China and its growing threat to Taiwan, Iranian threats to American interests and those of our partners in the Middle East, or any other emerging security crisis; nor does this debt ceiling deal limit the Senate’s ability to appropriate emergency/supplemental funds to respond to various national issues, such as disaster relief, or combating the fentanyl crisis, or other issues of national importance. (6) the President should expeditiously send emergency funding requests to the Senate for consideration so that those needs can receive sufficient and additional funds. B Counterdrug activities 1011. Disruption of fentanyl trafficking (a) Sense of Senate It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) fentanyl trafficking across the borders of the United States, and the consequences of that trafficking, constitute an unprecedented, nontraditional, and long-term threat to the national security of the United States; (2) transnational criminal organizations have established effective control over significant areas within Mexico, which has enabled the development of fentanyl production and trafficking infrastructure; (3) combating fentanyl trafficking demands— (A) improved interagency command, control, communications, and intelligence sharing to enhance the effectiveness of the interdiction of fentanyl at the borders of the United States; and (B) whole-of-government solutions comprised of an integrated and synchronized interagency organizational construct committed to dismantling the process of trafficking fentanyl from chemical precursor to production to delivery in the United States and enabling partner nations to do the same; (4) it is within the national security interest of the United States for Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies, the Department of Defense, the Department of State, other counter-drug agencies, and stakeholders to effectively communicate and that the failure of effective communication affects the prevention, interdiction, and prosecution of fentanyl trafficking and distribution into and within the United States; and (5) the United States must partner with Mexico and Canada to combat fentanyl trafficking through institution building, the dismantling of cartels, and seizures of fentanyl in Mexico, Canada, and intrastate transit zones. (b) Development of strategy to counter fentanyl trafficking and report (1) Strategy (A) In general Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with other Federal agencies as the Secretary considers appropriate, shall develop and submit to the appropriate congressional committees a strategy to use existing authorities, including the authorities under section 124 of title 10, United States Code, as appropriate, to target, disrupt, or degrade threats to the national security of the United States caused or exacerbated by fentanyl trafficking. (B) Contents The strategy required by subparagraph (A) shall outline how the Secretary of Defense will— (i) leverage existing authorities regarding counterdrug and counter-transnational organized crime activities with a counter-fentanyl nexus to detect and monitor activities related to fentanyl trafficking; (ii) support operations to counter fentanyl trafficking carried out by other Federal agencies, State, Tribal, and local law enforcement agencies, or foreign security forces; (iii) coordinate efforts of the Department of Defense for the detection and monitoring of aerial, maritime, and surface traffic suspected of carrying fentanyl bound for the United States, including efforts to unify the use of technology, surveillance, and related resources across air, land, and maritime domains to counter fentanyl trafficking, including with respect to data collection, data processing, and integrating sensors across such domains; (iv) provide military-unique capabilities to support activities by the United States Government and foreign security forces to detect and monitor the trafficking of fentanyl and precursor chemicals used in fentanyl production, consistent with section 284(b)(10) of title 10, United States Code; (v) leverage existing counterdrug and counter-transnational organized crime programs of the Department to counter fentanyl trafficking; (vi) assess existing training programs of the Department and provide training for Federal, State, Tribal, and local law enforcement agencies conducted by special operations forces to counter fentanyl trafficking, consistent with section 284(b) of title 10, United States Code; (vii) engage with foreign security forces to ensure the counterdrug and counter-transnational organized crime programs of the Department— (I) support efforts to counter fentanyl trafficking; and (II) build capacity to interdict fentanyl in foreign countries, including programs to train security forces in partner countries to counter fentanyl trafficking, including countering illicit flows of fentanyl precursors, consistent with sections 284(c) and 333 of title 10, United States Code; (viii) use the North American Defense Ministerial and the bilateral defense working groups and bilateral military cooperation round tables with Canada and Mexico to increase domain awareness to detect and monitor fentanyl trafficking; and (ix) evaluate existing policies, procedures, processes, and resources that affect the ability of the Department to counter fentanyl trafficking consistent with existing counterdrug and counter-transnational organized crime authorities. (C) Form The strategy required by subparagraph (A) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (D) Briefing Not later than 45 days after the submission of the strategy required by subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall provide to the appropriate congressional committees a briefing on the strategy and plans for its implementation. (2) Report on law enforcement reimbursement The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on— (A) any goods or services provided under section 1535 of title 31, United States Code (commonly known as the Economy Act (B) any payments made for such goods or services under such section during such period. (c) Cooperation with Mexico (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall seek to enhance cooperation with defense officials of the Government of Mexico to target, disrupt, and degrade transnational criminal organizations within Mexico that traffic fentanyl. (2) Report on enhanced security cooperation (A) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on efforts to enhance cooperation with defense officials of the Government of Mexico specified in paragraph (1). (B) Contents The report required by subparagraph (A) shall include— (i) an assessment of the impact of the efforts to enhance cooperation described in paragraph (1) on targeting, disrupting, and degrading fentanyl trafficking; (ii) a description of limitations on such efforts, including limitations imposed by the Government of Mexico; (iii) recommendations by the Secretary on actions to further improve cooperation with defense officials of the Government of Mexico; (iv) recommendations by the Secretary on actions of the Department of Defense to further improve the capabilities of the Government of Mexico to target, disrupt, and degrade fentanyl trafficking; and (v) any other matter the Secretary considers relevant. (C) Form The report required by subparagraph (A) may be submitted in unclassified form but shall include a classified annex. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate congressional committees The term appropriate congressional committees (A) the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. (2) Fentanyl The term fentanyl (3) Fentanyl-related substance The term fentanyl-related substance (A) means any substance that is structurally related to fentanyl by 1 or more modifications of— (i) replacement of the phenyl portion of the phenethyl group by any monocycle, whether or not further substituted in or on the monocycle; (ii) substitution in or on the phenethyl group with alkyl, alkenyl, alkoxyl, hydroxyl, halo, haloalkyl, amino, or nitro groups; (iii) substitution in or on the piperidine ring with alkyl, alkenyl, alkoxyl, ester, ether, hydroxyl, halo, haloalkyl, amino, or nitro groups; (iv) replacement of the aniline ring with any aromatic monocycle whether or not further substituted in or on the aromatic monocycle; and (v) replacement of the N-propionyl group with another acyl group; and (B) does not include a substance described in subparagraph (A) that is— (i) controlled by action of the Attorney General pursuant to section 201 of the Controlled Substances Act ( 21 U.S.C. 811 (ii) expressly listed in Schedule I of section 202(c) of that Act ( 21 U.S.C. 812 (iii) removed from Schedule I, or rescheduled to another schedule, pursuant to section 201(k) of that Act ( 21 U.S.C. 811(k) (4) Illegal means The term illegal means (5) Security cooperation program The term security cooperation program (6) Transnational criminal organization (A) In general The term transnational criminal organization (B) Additional organizations The term transnational criminal organization 1012. Enhanced support for counterdrug activities and activities to counter transnational organized crime Section 284(b)(9) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking linguist and intelligence analysis linguist, intelligence analysis, and planning 1013. Modification of support for counterdrug activities and activities to counter transnational organized crime: increase in cap for small scale construction projects Section 284(i)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking $750,000 $1,500,000 1014. Building the capacity of armed forces of Mexico to counter the threat posed by transnational criminal organizations (a) Pilot program Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall establish a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of building the capacity of armed forces of Mexico in the United States on goals, jointly agreed to by the Governments of the United States and Mexico, to counter the threat posed by transnational criminal organizations, including through— (1) operations designed, at least in part, by the United States, to counter that threat; and (2) in consultation with the appropriate civilian government agencies specializing in countering transnational criminal organizations— (A) joint network analysis; (B) counter threat financing; (C) counter illicit trafficking (including narcotics, weapons, and human trafficking, and illicit trafficking in natural resources); and (D) assessments of key nodes of activity of transnational criminal organizations. (b) Plan (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a plan for implementing the pilot program required by subsection (a) over a period of five years, including the costs of administering the program during such period. (2) Definition of appropriate congressional committees In this subsection, the term appropriate congressional committees (A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. C Naval vessels 1021. Modification of authority to purchase used vessels under the National Defense Sealift Fund Section 2218(f)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking subparagraphs (C), (E) and (G); and (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) and (F) as subparagraphs (C) and (D), respectively. 1022. Amphibious warship force availability Section 8062 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (e)— (A) in paragraph (2), by striking and (B) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and (C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) the Navy adjusts scheduled maintenance and repair actions to maintain a minimum of 24 amphibious warfare ships operationally available for worldwide deployment. ; and (2) by redesignating the second subsection (g) (defining amphibious warfare ship) as subsection (h). 1023. Prohibition on retirement of certain naval vessels None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2024 may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage any of the following naval vessels: (1) USS Germantown (LSD 42). (2) USS Gunston Hall (LSD 44). (3) USS Tortuga (LSD 46). (4) USS Shiloh (CG 67). 1024. Report on the potential for an Army and Navy joint effort for watercraft vessels (a) Report required Not later than February 29, 2024, the Secretary of the Navy, in coordination with the Secretary of the Army, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the feasibility of conducting a joint Army and Navy effort to develop and field a family of watercraft vessels to support the implementation of the Marine Corps concept of expeditionary advanced base operations and Army operations in maritime environments. (b) Elements The report required by subsection (a) shall include an assessment of whether a shared base platform could meet requirements of the Department of the Navy and the Department of the Army, and, if so, an assessment of the benefits and challenges of procuring a technical data package to allow simultaneous construction of such platform by multiple builders and using block buy authorities. D Counterterrorism 1031. Extension of prohibition on use of funds to close or relinquish control of United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba Section 1036 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 Public Law 117–236 2023 2024 1032. Extension of prohibition on use of funds for transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States Section 1033 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 Public Law 117–236 December 31, 2023 December 31, 2024 1033. Extension of prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the United States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba Section 1034(a) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 Public Law 117–236 December 31, 2023 December 31, 2024 1034. Extension of prohibition on use of funds for transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to certain countries Section 1035 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 Public Law 117–236 December 31, 2023 December 31, 2024 E Miscellaneous authorities and limitations 1041. Extension of admission to Guam or the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands for certain nonimmigrant H–2B workers Section 6(b)(1)(B) of the Joint Resolution entitled A Joint Resolution to approve the Covenant to Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in Political Union with the United States of America 48 U.S.C. 1806(b)(1)(B) December 31, 2023 December 31, 2029 1042. Authority to include funding requests for the chemical and biological defense program in budget accounts of military departments Section 1701(d)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 ( 50 U.S.C. 1522(d)(2) may not be included in the budget accounts may be included in the budget accounts 1043. Unfavorable security clearance eligibility determinations and appeals (a) Administrative due process procedures for covered individuals seeking or having access to classified information or sensitive compartment information (1) In general Each head of a component of the Department of Defense shall provide to each covered individual described in paragraph (2) of such component seeking or having access to classified information or sensitive compartment information with administrative due process procedures described in paragraph (3) through the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals. (2) Covered individual described A covered individual described in this paragraph is a member of the Armed Forces, a civilian employee employed by a component of the Department of Defense, or a contractor employee described in Department of Defense Manual 5220.22, Volume 2 (relating to National Industrial Security Program: Industrial Security Procedures for Government Activities), or successor manual. (3) Administrative due process procedures described The administrative due process procedures described in this paragraph are the administrative due process procedures described in Department of Defense Directive 5220.6 (relating to Defense Industrial Personnel Security Clearance Review Program), or successor directive, and Executive Order 10865 ( 50 U.S.C. 3161 (b) Hearings, appeals, and final denials and revocations of security clearance eligibility In order to simplify, centralize, and unify the administrative processes for unfavorable security clearance eligibility determinations for covered individuals described in subsection (a)(2), the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that all hearings, appeals, and final denials and revocations of security clearance eligibility are performed by the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals with administrative due process procedures. (c) Updates to Department of Defense manuals The Secretary of Defense shall update Department of Defense Manual 5200.02 (relating to procedures for Department of Defense Personnel Security Program) and Department of Defense Manual 5220.22, Volume 2 (relating to National Industrial Security Program: Industrial Security Procedures for Government Activities) to conform with the requirements of subsections (a) and (b). (d) Authority of Director of Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals to render eligibility determinations for access to classified information and sensitive compartmented information The Director of the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals may render eligibility determinations for access to classified information and sensitive compartmented information pursuant to procedures and guidelines that the Director shall issue in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence. (e) Dissemination of security relevant information (1) Request for sharing required In a case in which a contractor or civilian employee of the Federal Government holding an active security clearance is seeking to transfer that clearance for a new position in the Department of Defense and in which an agency or department of the Federal Government possesses security relevant information about that clearance holder that is related to eligibility for access to classified information and makes known the existence of such security relevant information in the commonly accessible security clearance databases of the Federal Government, but without taking any action to suspend or revoke that clearance holder’s security clearance, the Department of Defense component considering the transfer of a clearance shall promptly make a request to receive the security relevant information from the agency or department in possession of such information. (2) Failure to share In a case in which an agency or department of the Federal Government receives a request to share security relevant information about a clearance holder pursuant to paragraph (1) but fails to do so within 30 days of the date on which the request is made, such failure shall trigger procedural and substantive due process rights, established for the purposes of carrying out this section, for the clearance holder to challenge the security relevant information as if the information were the equivalent of a suspension, denial, or revocation of the underlying clearance. (f) Protections Members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense may not be suspended without pay because a security clearance is suspended or revoked prior to the conclusion of any appeal process to enable such members and employee to support themselves during an appeal process and to support themselves without resigning from Government employment and thereby losing standing to appeal the suspension or revocation of access to classified information. (g) Effective date; applicability (1) Effective date This section shall take effect on the earlier of— (A) the date on which the General Counsel of the Department of Defense certifies to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives that the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals is prepared for the provisions of this section to take effect; or (B) September 30, 2024. (2) Applicability This section shall apply to revocations of eligibility to access classified information or sensitive compartmented information that occur on or after the date on which this section takes effect pursuant to paragraph (1). (h) Rule of construction Nothing in this section shall be construed to diminish or otherwise affect the authority of the head of a component of the Department to suspend access to classified information or a special access program, including sensitive compartmented information, in exigent circumstances, should the head determine that continued access of a covered individual is inconsistent with protecting the national security of the United States. 1044. Assistance in support of Department of Defense accounting for missing United States Government personnel (a) In general Section 408 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the section heading, by striking Equipment and training of foreign personnel to assist in Assistance in support of (2) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (5) Funds. ; (3) by striking subsections (d) and (f); (4) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (d); and (5) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (e) Annual report Not later than December 31 of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the assistance provided under this section during the preceding fiscal year. . (b) Table of sections amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 20 408. Assistance in support of Department of Defense accounting for missing United States Government personnel. . 1045. Implementation of arrangements to build transparency, confidence, and security Section 2241 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (d) Implementation of Vienna Document 2011 Amounts appropriated for operation and maintenance may be used by the Secretary of Defense for travel, transportation, and subsistence expenses for meetings and demonstrations hosted by the Department of Defense for the implementation of the Vienna Document 2011 on Confidence and Security-Building Measures. . 1046. Access to and use of military post offices by United States citizens employed overseas by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization who perform functions in support of military operations of the Armed Forces (a) Requirement to authorize use of post office Section 406 of title 39, United States Code, is amended by striking may authorize the use shall authorize the use (b) Briefing requirement Not later than March 1, 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives on the revision of the Financial Management Regulation to authorize individuals under subparagraph (A) of section 406(c)(1) of title 39, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), to utilize the authority provided under such subparagraph. If there is a determination that this authority is not feasible for a legal or financial reason, the Secretary shall include the background for those determinations in the briefing. 1047. Removal of time limitations of temporary protection and authorization of reimbursement for security services and equipment for former or retired Department of Defense personnel (a) Removal of time limitations Section 714(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7); (2) in paragraph (5)— (A) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as paragraph (6) and moving such paragraph, as so redesignated, two ems to the left; and (B) by striking Duration of protection Duration of protection (3) in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (7), as redesignated by paragraph (1) of this subsection, by striking and of each determination under paragraph (5)(B) to extend such protection and security (b) Authorization of reimbursement or acquisition of security services Section 714 of title 10, United States Code, is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (e) Reimbursement The Secretary of Defense may reimburse a former or retired official who faces serious and credible threats arising from duties performed while employed by the Department for security services and equipment procured at the personal expense of the official, not to exceed an aggregate of $15,000,000 in any fiscal year for all former and retired officials authorized by the Secretary of Defense for such reimbursement. . 1048. Annual Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) capabilities required to expand accounting for persons missing from designated past conflicts (a) In general Not later than March 1, 2024, and annually thereafter, the Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) shall post on a publicly available internet website a list of capabilities required to expand accounting for persons missing from designated past conflicts and provide a briefing to Congress on those capabilities. (b) Authority to enter into agreements The Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency may enter into agreements with universities or research organizations to provide additional capabilities for specialized missions or research requirements. F Studies and reports 1051. Annual report and briefing on implementation of Force Design 2030 (a) In general Not later than March 31, 2024, and annually thereafter through March 31, 2030, the Commandant of the Marine Corps shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report detailing the programmatic choices made to implement Force Design 2030, including both new developmental and fielded capabilities, as well as capabilities and capacity divested to accelerate implementation of Force Design 2030. (b) Briefing requirement Not later than September 30, 2024, and annually thereafter through September 30, 2030, the Commandant of the Marine Corps shall provide a briefing on the elements described under subsection (c). (c) Elements The report required under subsection (a) and briefing required under subsection (b) shall include the following elements: (1) An assessment of changes in the National Defense Strategy, Defense Planning Guidance, Joint Warfighting Concept (and associated Concept Required Capabilities), and other planning processes that informed Force Design 2030. (2) An inventory and assessment of Force Design-related exercises and experimentation beginning in fiscal year 2020, including which capabilities were involved and the extent to which such exercises and experiments validated or militated against proposed capability investments. (3) An inventory of divestments of capability or capacity, whether force structure or equipment, starting in fiscal year 2020, including— (A) a timeline of the progress of each divestment; (B) the type of force structure or equipment divested or reduced; (C) the percentage of force structure or equipment divested or reduced, including any equipment entered into inventory management or another form of storage; (D) the rationale and context behind such divestment; (E) an identification of whether such divestment affects the Marine Corps’ ability to meet the requirements of Global Force Management process and the operational plans, including an explanation of how the Marine Corps plans to mitigate the loss of such capability or capacity if the divestment affects the Marine Corps’ ability to meet the requirements of the Global Force Management process and the operational plans, including through new investments, additional joint planning and training, or other methods; and (F) an assessment of the Marine Corps’ recruitment and retention actual and projected percentages starting in fiscal year 2020. (4) An inventory of extant or planned investments as a part of Force Design 2030, disaggregated by integrated air and missile defense, littoral mobility and maneuver, sea denial, and reconnaissance and counter-reconnaissance forces, including— (A) capability name; (B) capability purpose and context; (C) capability being replaced (or not applicable); (D) date of initial operational capability; (E) date of full operational capability; (F) deliveries of units by year; and (G) approved acquisition objective or similar inventory objective. (5) A description of the amphibious warfare ship and maritime mobility requirements the Marine Corps submitted to the Department of the Navy in support of the Marine Corps organization and concepts under Force Design 2030 and its statutory requirements, including a detailed statement of the planning assumptions about readiness of amphibious warfare ships and maritime mobility platforms that were used in developing the requirements. (6) An assessment of how the capability investments described in paragraph (4) contribute to joint force efficacy in new ways, including through support of other military services. (7) An assessment of the ability of the Marine Corps to generate required force elements for the Immediate Ready Force and the Contingency Ready Force over the previous two fiscal years and the expected ability to generate forces for the next two fiscal years. (8) An assessment of Marine Corps force structure and the readiness of Marine Expeditionary Units compared to availability of amphibious ships comprising an Amphibious Ready Group over the previous two fiscal years and the expected availability for the next two fiscal years. (9) An assessment by the Marine Corps of its compliance with the statutory organization prescribed in section 8063 of title 10, United States Code, that [t]he Marine Corps, within the Department of the Navy, shall be so organized as to include not less than three combat divisions and three air wings, and such other land combat, aviation, and other services as may be organic therein (10) An assessment by the Marine Corps of its compliance with the statutory functions prescribed in section 8063 of title 10, United States Code, that [t]he Marine Corps shall be organized, trained, and equipped to provide fleet marine forces of combined arms, together with supporting air components, for service with the fleet in the seizure or defense of advanced naval bases and for the conduct of such land operations as may be essential to the prosecution of a naval campaign 1052. Plan for conversion of Joint Task Force North into Joint Interagency Task Force North (a) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the head of any relevant Federal department or agency and acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for converting the Joint Task Force North of the United States Northern Command into a joint interagency task force to be known as the Joint Interagency Task Force North (b) Elements The plan required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A description of the mission of the Joint Interagency Task Force North. (2) A detailed description of the resources of the Department of Defense, including personnel, facilities, and operating costs, necessary to convert the Joint Task Force North into a joint interagency task force. (3) An identification of— (A) each relevant department and agency of the United States Government the participation in the Joint Interagency Task Force North of which is necessary in order to enable the Joint Interagency Task Force North to effectively carry out its mission; and (B) the interagency arrangements necessary to ensure effective participation by each such department and agency. (4) An identification of each international liaison necessary for the Joint Interagency Task Force North to effectively carry out its mission. (5) A description of the bilateral and multilateral agreements with foreign partners and regional and international organizations that would support the implementation of the mission of the Joint Interagency Task Force North. (6) A description of the relationship between the Joint Interagency Task Force North and the Joint Interagency Task Force South of the United States Southern Command. (7) A description of the relationship between the Joint Interagency Task Force North and the relevant security forces of the Government of Mexico and the Government of the Bahamas. (8) A recommendation on whether the Joint Interagency Task Force North should be an enduring entity and a discussion of the circumstances under which the mission of the Joint Interagency Task Force North would transition to one or more entities within the United States Government other than the United States Northern Command. (9) Any recommendations for additional legal authority needed for the Joint Interagency Task Force North to effectively carry out its mission. (c) Form The plan required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex. (d) Interim briefing Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees on progress made in developing the plan required by subsection (a). 1053. Report on use of tactical fighter aircraft and bomber aircraft for deployments and homeland defense missions (a) In general Not later than May 1, 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report including the results of a study on the use of tactical fighter aircraft and bomber aircraft for deployments and homeland defense missions. (b) Scope The study conducted pursuant to subsection (a) shall— (1) review both deployment and exercise requirements for tactical fighter aircraft and bomber aircraft levied by each geographic combatant command; (2) assess deployable forces currently available to fulfill each of those requirements, and whether those forces are adequate to meet the global requirements; (3) review any relevant tactical fighter forces or bomber forces that are not considered deployable or available to meet combatant command requirements, and consider whether that status can or should change; (4) assess whether adequate consideration has been put into fighter coverage of the homeland during these deployments, in particular within the Alaska Area of Responsibility and the Hawaii Area of Responsibility; and (5) assess Air Force and Navy active duty, Air National Guard, and reserve land-based tactical fighter units that could be considered for inclusion into homeland defense mission requirements. 1054. Modifications of reporting requirements (a) Consolidated budget quarterly report on use of funds Section 381(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the subsection heading, by striking Quarterly report Semiannual report (2) by striking calendar quarter calendar half (3) by striking such calendar quarter such calendar half (b) Monthly counterterrorism operations briefing (1) In general Section 485 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) in the section heading, by striking Monthly Quarterly (B) in subsection (a), by striking monthly quarterly (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 485 and inserting the following new item: 485. Quarterly counterterrorism operations briefings. . (c) National security strategy for the National Technology and Industrial Base Section 4811(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking The Secretary shall submit such strategy to Congress not later than 180 days after the date of submission of the national security strategy report required under section 108 of the National Security Act of 1947 ( 50 U.S.C. 3043 The Secretary shall submit such strategy to Congress as an integrated part of the report submitted under section 4814 of this title. (d) National Technology and Industrial Base report and quarterly briefing (1) In general Section 4814 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) by amending the section heading to read as follows: 4814. National Technology and Industrial Base: biennial report ; (B) by striking (a) Annual report.— (C) by striking March 1 of each year March 1 of each odd-numbered year (D) by striking subsection (b). (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 382 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 4814 and inserting the following: 4814. National Technology and Industrial Base: biennial report. . (3) Conforming amendment Section 858(b)(2) of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 (e) Annual military cyberspace operations report Section 1644 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( 10 U.S.C. 394 Public Law 116–92 (1) in subsection (a) in the matter preceding paragraph (1) in the first sentence— (A) by inserting effects all named military cyberspace (B) by striking , operations, cyber effects enabling operations, and cyber operations conducted as defensive operations conducted for either offensive or defensive purposes (2) in subsection (c), by inserting or cyber effects operations for which Congress has otherwise been provided notice (f) Independent studies regarding potential cost savings with respect to the nuclear security enterprise and force structure Section 1753 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 (g) Extension and modification of authority to provide assistance to the vetted syrian opposition Section 1231(d) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (1) in the subsection heading, by striking Quarterly Semiannual (2) in paragraph (1)— (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking quarterly semiannual (B) in subparagraph (A), by striking 90-day 180-day (h) Extension of authority to provide assistance to counter the islamic state of Iraq and Syria Section 1233(e) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (1) in the heading, by striking Quarterly Semiannual (2) in paragraph (1) in the second sentence of the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking quarterly semiannual (i) Theft, loss, or release of biological select agents or toxins involving Department of Defense Section 1067(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 50 U.S.C. 1528(a) (a) Notification (1) Subject to paragraph (2), not later than 45 days after a covered report of any theft, loss, or release of a biological select agent or toxin involving the Department of Defense is filed with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs, shall provide to the congressional defense committees notice of such theft, loss, or release. (2) The Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees notice of a release under paragraph (1) only if the Secretary, acting through the Assistant Secretary, determines that the release is outside the barriers of secondary containment into the ambient air or environment or is causing occupational exposure that presents a threat to public safety. (3) In this subsection, the term covered report (A) Section 331.19 of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations. (B) Section 121.19 of title 9, Code of Federal Regulations. (C) Section 73.19 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations. . (j) Department of Defense security cooperation workforce development Section 1250(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking each year every other year (2) in paragraph (2) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking for the fiscal year for the fiscal years (k) Audit of Department of Defense financial statements Section 240a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking (a) Annual audit required.— (2) by striking subsection (b). (l) Financial improvement and audit remediation plan Section 240b(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking June 30, 2019, and annually thereafter July 31 each year (B) in subparagraph (B)— (i) by striking clauses (vii) through (x); and (ii) by redesignating clauses (xi), (xii), and (xiii) as clauses (vii), (viii), and (ix), respectively; and (C) by striking subparagraph (C); and (2) in paragraph (2)— (A) in subparagraph (A)— (i) by striking June 30 July 31 (ii) by striking the second sentence; and (B) in subparagraph (b)— (i) by striking June 30 July 31 (ii) by striking the second sentence. (m) Annual reports on funding Section 1009(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 10 U.S.C. 240b five days 10 days 1055. Report on equipping certain ground combat units with small unmanned aerial systems (a) Report required Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, submit to the congressional defense committees a report on equipping platoon-sized ground combat formations with covered small unmanned aerial systems. (b) Elements The report submitted pursuant to subsection (a) shall address the following: (1) The use of covered small unmanned aerial systems in the Ukraine conflict and best practices learned. (2) The potential use of covered small unmanned aerial systems to augment small unit tactics and lethality in the ground combat forces. (3) Procurement challenges, legal restrictions, training shortfalls, operational limitations, or other impediments to fielding covered small unmanned aerial systems at the platoon level. (4) A plan to equip platoon-sized ground combat formations in the close combat force with covered small unmanned aerial systems at a basis of issue deemed appropriate by the relevant secretary, including a proposed timeline and fielding strategy. (5) A plan to equip such other ground combat units with covered small unmanned aerial systems as deemed appropriate by the relevant secretaries. (6) An assessment of appropriate mission allocation between Group 3 unmanned aerial systems, Group 1 unmanned aerial systems, and covered small unmanned aerial systems. (c) Definition of covered small unmanned aerial system In this section, the term covered small unmanned aerial system (1) intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition, and reconnaissance; (2) conducting offensive strikes; or (3) other functions as deemed appropriate by the relevant secretaries. 1056. Comprehensive assessment of Marine Corps Force Design 2030 (a) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a contract with a Federally Funded Research and Development Center to conduct an independent review, assessment, and analysis of the Marine Corps modernization initiatives. The required report shall be submitted to the congressional defense committees in written report form not later than one year after entering into the contract. (b) Elements The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements: (1) An assessment of changes in the National Defense Strategy, Defense Planning Guidance, the Joint Warfighting Concept, and other strategic documents and concepts that informed Force Design modernization requirements. (2) An assessment of how the Marine Corps, consistent with authorized end strength, can be structured, organized, trained, equipped, and postured to meet the challenges of future competition, crisis, and conflict to include discussion of multiple structural options as relevant and the tradeoffs between different options. (3) An assessment of the ability of the defense innovation base and defense industrial base to develop and produce the technologies required to implement the Marine Corps’ published Force Design modernization plan on a timeline and at production rates sufficient to sustain military operations. (4) An assessment of forward infrastructure and the extent to which installations are operationalized to deter, compete, and prevail during conflict in support of the Marine Corps modernization. (5) An assessment of whether the Marine Corps is in compliance with the statutory organization and functions prescribed in section 8063 of title 10, United States Code. (6) An assessment of the current retention and recruiting environment and the ability of the Marine Corps to sustain manpower requirements necessary for operational requirements levied by title 10, in light of the published Force Design plan. (7) The extent to which the modernization initiatives within the Marine Corps are nested within applicable joint warfighting concepts. (8) An assessment of whether the Marine Corps’ modernization is consistent with the strategy of integrated deterrence. (9) An assessment of the ability of the Marine Corps to generate required force elements for the Immediate Ready Force and the Contingency Ready Force, based on current and planned end strength and structure. (10) The extent to which the Marine Corps’ published plan for modernized capabilities can be integrated across the Joint Force, to include warfighting concepts at the combatant command level. (11) The extent to which the Marine Corps’ modernization efforts currently meet the requirements of combatant commanders’ current plans and global force management operations, to include a description of what mechanisms exist to ensure geographic combatant requirements inform Marine Corps modernization efforts. (12) The extent to which modeling and simulation, experimentation, wargaming, and other analytic methods support the changes incorporated into the Marine Corps’ modernization initiatives, to include underlying assumptions and outcomes of such analyses. (13) An inventory of extant or planned investments as part of the Marine Corps’ modernization efforts, disaggregated by the following capability areas and including actual or projected dates of Initial Operational Capability and Full Operational Capability: (A) Command and Control. (B) Information. (C) Intelligence. (D) Fires. (E) Movement and Maneuver. (F) Protection. (G) Sustainment. (14) An inventory of divestments of capability or capacity, whether force structure or equipment, starting in fiscal year 2020, including— (A) a timeline of the progress of each divestment; (B) the type of force structure or equipment divested or reduced; (C) the percentage of force structure of equipment divested or reduced, including any equipment entered into inventory management or other form of storage; (D) the rationale and context behind such divestment; and (E) an identification of whether such divestment affects the Marine Corps’ ability to meet the requirements of Global Force Management process and the operational plans. (15) An assessment of how observations regarding the invasion and defense of Ukraine affect the feasibility, advisability, and suitability of the Marine Corps’ published modernization plans. (c) Classification of report The report required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified appendix to the extent required to ensure that the report is accurate and complete. 1057. Strategy to achieve critical mineral supply chain independence for the Department of Defense (a) Strategy required (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a strategy to develop supply chains for the Department of Defense that are not dependent on mining or processing of critical minerals in or by covered countries, prioritizing production and processing in the United States, in order to achieve critical mineral supply chain independence from covered countries for the Department by 2035. (2) Elements The strategy required by paragraph (1) shall— (A) identify and assess significant vulnerabilities in the supply chains of contractors and subcontractors of the Department of Defense involving critical minerals that are mined or processed in or by covered countries; (B) identify and recommend changes to the acquisition laws, regulations, and policies of the Department of Defense to ensure contractors and subcontractors of the Department use supply chains involving critical minerals that are not mined or processed in or by covered countries to the greatest extent practicable, prioritizing production and processing in the United States; (C) evaluate the utility and desirability of using authorities provided by the Defense Production Act of 1950 ( 50 U.S.C. 4501 et seq. (D) evaluate the utility and desirability of expanding authorities provided by the Defense Production Act of 1950 to be used to expand supply chains and processing capacity for critical minerals by countries that are allies or partners of the United States; (E) evaluate the utility and desirability of leveraging the process for acquiring shortfall materials for the National Defense Stockpile under the Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act ( 50 U.S.C. 98 et seq. (F) identify areas of potential engagement and partnership with the governments of countries that are allies or partners of the United States to jointly reduce dependence on critical minerals mined or processed in or by covered countries; (G) identify and recommend other policy changes that may be needed to achieve critical mineral supply chain independence from covered countries for the Department; (H) identify and recommend measures to streamline authorities and policies with respect to critical minerals and supply chains for critical minerals; and (I) prioritize the recommendations made in the strategy to achieve critical mineral supply chain independence from covered countries for the Department, prioritizing production and processing in the United States, and taking into consideration economic costs and varying degrees of vulnerability posed to the national security of the United States by reliance on different types of critical minerals. (3) Form of strategy The strategy required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in classified form but shall include an unclassified summary. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate committees of Congress The term appropriate committees of Congress (A) the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. (2) Covered country The term covered country (A) a covered nation, as defined in section 4872, title 10, United States Code; and (B) any other country determined by the Secretary of Defense to be a geostrategic competitor or adversary of the United States for purposes of this Act. (3) Critical mineral The term critical mineral 30 U.S.C. 1606(a) (4) Shortfall material The term shortfall material 50 U.S.C. 98h–5 1058. Quarterly briefing on homeland defense planning (a) In general Not later than February 1, 2024, and every 90 days thereafter through February 1, 2026, the Secretary of Defense shall provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees on efforts to bolster homeland defense, which is the top priority under the 2022 National Defense Strategy. (b) Contents Each briefing required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A summary of any update made to the homeland defense planning guidance of the Department of Defense during the preceding quarter. (2) An update on the latest threats to the homeland posed by the Government of the People's Republic of China, the Government of the Russian Federation, the Government of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the Government of Iran, and any other adversary. (3) A description of actions taken by the Department during the preceding quarter to mitigate such threats. (4) An assessment of threats to the homeland in the event of a conflict with any adversary referred to in paragraph (2). (5) A description of actions taken by the Department during the preceding quarter to bolster homeland defense in the event of such a conflict. (6) An update on coordination by the Department with Federal, State, and Tribal agencies to bolster homeland defense. (7) Any other matter the Secretary considers relevant. 1059. Special operations force structure (a) Sense of Senate It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) special operations forces have a vital and increasing role to play in strategic competition in addition to conducting counterterrorism operations and responding to crises; (2) the demand for special operations forces and related capabilities by combatant commanders continues to exceed supply; (3) special operations forces cannot be mass produced during a crisis; (4) most special operations require non-special operations forces support, including engineers, technicians, intelligence analysts, and logisticians; (5) reductions to special operations forces, including critical enablers, would dramatically and negatively impact available options for combatant commanders to engage in strategic competition, carry out counterterrorism operations, and respond to crises; and (6) the Secretary of Defense should not consider any reductions to special operations force structure until after the completion of a comprehensive analysis of special operations force structure and a determination that any planned changes would not have a negative impact on the ability of combatant commanders to support strategic competition, counter terrorism, and respond to crises. (b) Report Not later than March 1, 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the optimal force structure for special operations forces that includes the following elements: (1) A description of the role of special operations forces in implementing the most recent national defense strategy under section 113(g) of title 10, United States Code. (2) A description of ongoing special operations activities, as described in section 167(k) of title 10, United States Code. (3) An assessment of potential future national security threats to the United States across the spectrum of competition and conflict. (4) A description of ongoing counterterrorism and contingency operations of the United States. (5) A detailed accounting of the demand for special operations forces by geographic combatant command. (6) A description of the role of emerging technology on special operations forces. (7) An assessment of current and projected capabilities of other United States Armed Forces that could affect force structure capability and capacity requirements of special operations forces. (8) An assessment of the size, composition, and organizational structure of the military services’ special operations command headquarters and subordinate headquarters elements. (9) An assessment of the readiness of special operations forces for assigned missions and future conflicts. (10) An assessment of the adequacy of special operations force structure for meeting the goals of the National Military Strategy under section 153(b) of title 10, United States Code. (11) A description of the role of special operations forces in supporting the Joint Concept for Competing. (12) Any other matters deemed relevant by the Secretary. 1060. Briefing on commercial tools employed by the Department of Defense to assess foreign ownership, control, or influence (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on countering industrial espionage. (b) Elements The request required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements: (1) A description of commercial and organically developed tools employed by the Department of Defense to— (A) assess the risks of foreign malign ownership, control, or influence within the defense industrial base; (B) mitigate vulnerability associated with, but no limited to, the People's Republic of China's, the Russian Federation's, Iran's, or North Korea's foreign ownership, control, or influence of any part of the acquisition supply chain; and (C) vet program personnel to identify technologies and program components most at risk for industrial espionage. (2) A description of specific commercial solutions the Department is currently leveraging to assess and mitigate these risks. 1061. Plan on countering human trafficking (a) Plan Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit a plan to the congressional defense committees for coordinating with defense partners in North America and South America and supporting interagency departments and agencies, as appropriate, in countering human trafficking operations, including human trafficking by transnational criminal organizations. (b) Elements of plan The plan under subsection (a) shall include— (1) a description of the threat to United States security from human trafficking operations; (2) a description of the authorities of the Department of Defense for the purposes specified in subsection (a); (3) a description of any current or proposed Department of Defense programs or activities to coordinate with defense partners or provide support to interagency departments and agencies as described in subsection (a); and (4) any recommendations of the Secretary of Defense for additional authorities for the purposes of countering human trafficking, including by transnational criminal organizations. (c) Briefing Not later than 180 days after the submission of the plan required under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall brief the congressional defense committees regarding the authorities, programs, and activities of the Department of Defense to counter human trafficking operations. 1062. Briefing and report on use and effectiveness of United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (a) In general Not later than April 30, 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a briefing and report on whether United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, is being used effectively to defend the national security interests of the United States. (b) Elements The briefing and report required by subsection (a) shall— (1) consider— (A) the presence and activities in Cuba of the militaries of foreign governments, such as the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China; and (B) to what extent the presence and activities of those militaries could compromise the national security of the United States or of United States allies and partners; and (2) discuss— (A) options for dealing with the presence and activities of those militaries in Cuba; and (B) how different use by the United States of United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, might mitigate risk. G Other matters 1071. Matters related to irregular warfare (a) Affirming the authority of the Secretary of Defense to conduct irregular warfare Congress affirms that the Secretary of Defense is authorized to conduct irregular warfare operations, including clandestine irregular warfare operations, to defend the United States, allies of the United States, and interests of the United States. (b) Definition required Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, for the purposes of joint doctrine, define the term irregular warfare (c) Rule of construction Nothing in this section shall be construed to constitute a specific statutory authorization for any of the following: (1) The conduct of a covert action, as such term is defined in section 503(e) of the National Security Act of 1947 ( 50 U.S.C. 3093(e) (2) The introduction of United States Armed Forces, within the meaning of the War Powers Resolution ( Public Law 93–148 50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq. 1072. Joint concept for competing implementation updates (a) Implementation update and briefings required Not later than March 1, 2024, and every 180 days thereafter through March 1, 2026, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall provide the congressional defense committees with a written update with accompanying briefing on the implementation of the Joint Concept for Competing, released on February 10, 2023. (b) Elements At a minimum, the written updates and briefings required by subsection (a) shall include— (1) a detailed description of the Joint Staff’s efforts to develop integrated competitive strategies to address the challenges posed by specific adversaries, including those designed to— (A) deter aggression; (B) prepare for armed conflict, if necessary; (C) counter the competitive strategies of adversaries; and (D) support the efforts of interagency, allies and foreign partners, and interorganizational partners; (2) an identification of relevant updates to joint doctrine and professional military education; (3) an update on the Joint Concept for Competing’s concept required capabilities; (4) an explanation of the integration of the Joint Concept for Competing with other ongoing and future joint force development and design efforts; (5) a description of efforts to operationalize the Joint Concept for Competing through a structured approach, including to provide strategic guidance and direction, identify and optimize Joint Force interdependencies with interagency and allied partners, and inform and guide joint force development and design processes; (6) an articulation of concept-required capabilities that are necessary for joint force development and design in support of the Joint Concept for Competing; (7) a description of efforts to coordinate and synchronize Department of Defense activities with those of other interagency and foreign partners for the purpose of integrated campaigning; (8) an identification of any recommendations to better integrate the role of the Joint Force, as identified by the Joint Concept for Competing, with national security efforts of other interagency and foreign partners; (9) an identification of any changes to authorities and resources necessary to fully implement the Joint Concept for Competing; and (10) a description of any other matters deemed relevant by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. 1073. Limitation on certain funding until submission of the Chairman’s Risk Assessment and briefing requirement (a) Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2024 for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide, and available for the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date that is 15 days after the date on which the following reports are submitted to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives: (1) The 2021 risk assessment mandated by paragraph (2) of subsection (b) of section 153 of title 10, United States Code, and required to be delivered pursuant to paragraph (3) of such subsection by not later than February 15, 2021. (2) The 2023 risk assessment mandated by paragraph (2) of subsection (b) of section 153 of title 10, United States Code, and required to be delivered pursuant to paragraph (3) of such subsection by not later than February 15, 2023. (b) Office of the Secretary of Defense Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2024 for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide, and available for the Office of the Secretary of Defense, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date that is 15 days after the date on which the Secretary submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives: (1) The risk mitigation plan required to be submitted as part of the assessment described under subsection (a)(1), if applicable. (2) The risk mitigation plan required to be submitted as part of the assessment described under subsection (a)(2), if applicable. (c) Briefing requirement Section 153 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (d) Briefing requirement (1) Not later than 15 days after the submission of the risk assessment required under subsection (b)(2) or March 1 of each year, whichever is earlier, the Chairman shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a briefing on the activities of the Chairman under this section. (2) The briefing shall include— (A) a detailed review of the risk assessment required under paragraph (2) of subsection (b), including how it addresses the elements required in subparagraph (B) of such paragraph; (B) an analysis of how the risk assessment informs, and supports, other Joint Staff assessments, including joint capability development assessments, joint force development assessments, comprehensive joint readiness assessments, and global military integration assessments; and (C) if the risk assessment is not delivered at the time of the briefing, a timeline for when the risk assessment will be submitted to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives. . 1074. Notification of safety and security concerns at certain Department of Defense laboratories (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees within 7 days after ceasing operations at any Department of Defense laboratory or facility rated at biosafety level (BSL)-3 or higher for safety or security reasons. (b) Content The notification required under subsection (a) shall include— (1) the reason why operations have ceased at the laboratory or facility; (2) whether appropriate notification to other Federal agencies has occurred; (3) a description of the actions taken to determine the root cause of the cessation; and (4) a description of the actions taken to restore operations at the laboratory or facility. 1075. Assessment and recommendations relating to infrastructure, capacity, resources, and personnel in Guam (a) Assessment The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Commander of United States Indo-Pacific Command, shall assess the capacity of existing infrastructure, resources, and personnel available in Guam to meet Indo-Pacific Command strategic objectives. (b) Elements The assessment under subsection (a) shall include the following elements: (1) An appraisal of the potential role Guam could play as a key logistics and operational hub for the United States military in the Indo-Pacific region. (2) An assessment of whether current infrastructure, capacity, resources, and personnel in Guam is sufficient to meet the expected demands during relevant operations and contingency scenarios. (3) An assessment of the adequacy of civilian infrastructure in Guam for supporting the requirements of United States Indo-Pacific Command, including the resilience of such infrastructure in the event of a natural disaster and the vulnerability of such infrastructure to cyber threats. (4) Recommendations to improve current infrastructure, capacity, resources, and personnel in Guam, to include the need for recruiting and retention programs, such as cost-of-living adjustments, initiatives for dealing with any shortages of civilian employees, and programs to improve quality-of-life for personnel assigned to Guam. (5) An assessment of the implementation of Joint Task Force Micronesia, including the Commander’s assessment of requirements for funding, resources, and personnel as compared to what has been programmed in the fiscal year 2024 Future Years Defense Program. (6) Timeline and estimated costs by location and project to support both existing and future roles in the region. (7) Any other matters determined relevant by the Secretary. (c) Report Not later than March 1, 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report including the results of the assessment required under subsection (a). 1076. Program and processes relating to foreign acquisition (a) Pilot program for combatant command use of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Account Each geographic combatant command may use amounts from the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Account established under section 1705 of title 10, United States Code, to hire not more than two acquisition specialists or contracting officers to advise the combatant command on foreign arms transfer processes, including the foreign military sales and direct commercial sales processes, for the purpose of facilitating the effective implementation of such processes. (b) Industry day (1) In general Not later than March 1, 2024, and not less frequently than annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct an industry day— (A) to raise awareness and understanding among officials of foreign governments, embassy personnel, and industry representatives with respect to the role of the Department of Defense in implementing the foreign military sales and direct commercial sales processes; and (B) to raise awareness— (i) within the United States private sector with respect to— (I) foreign demand for United States weapon systems; and (II) potential foreign industry partnering opportunities; and (ii) among officials of foreign governments and embassy personal with respect to potential United States material solutions for capability needs. (2) Format In conducting each industry day under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense, to the extent practicable, shall seek to maximize participation by representatives of the commercial defense industry and government officials while minimizing cost, by— (A) convening the industry day at the unclassified security level; (B) making the industry day publicly accessible through teleconference or other virtual means; and (C) disseminating any supporting materials by posting the materials on a publicly accessible internet website. (c) Senior-level industry advisory group (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with representatives of the commercial defense industry, shall establish a senior-level industry advisory group, modeled on the Defense Trade Advisory Group of the Department of State and the Industry Trade Advisory Committees of the Department of Commerce, for the purpose of focusing on the role of the Department of Defense in the foreign military sales process. (2) Briefing Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide a briefing to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on plans to establish the group described in paragraph (1). (d) Department of Defense points of contact for foreign military sales (1) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment and the Secretary of each military department shall each establish a single point of contact— (A) to coordinate information and outreach on Department of Defense implementation of the foreign military sales process; and (B) to respond to inquiries from representatives of the commercial defense industry and partner countries. (2) Points of contact The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment and the Secretary of each military department shall each ensure that the contact information for the corresponding point of contact established under paragraph (1) is— (A) publicized at each industry day conducted under subsection (b); and (B) disseminated among the members of the advisory group established under subsection (f). (e) Combatant command needs for exportability Not later than July 1 each year until 2030, the commander of each geographic combatant command shall provide to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment a list of systems relating to research and development or sustainment that would benefit from investment for exportability features in support of the security cooperation objectives of the commander. (f) Sunset This section shall cease to have effect on December 31, 2028. 1077. Technical and conforming amendments related to the Space Force (a) Appointment of Chairman; grade and rank Section 152(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking or, in the case of an officer of the Space Force, the equivalent grade, (b) Joint Requirements Oversight Council Section 181(c)(1)(F) of such title is amended by striking in the grade equivalent to the grade of general in the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps, or admiral in the Navy in the grade of general (c) Original appointments of commissioned officers Section 531(a) of such title is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking and Regular Marine Corps in the grades of ensign, lieutenant (junior grade), and lieutenant in the Regular Navy, and in the equivalent grades in the Regular Space Force Regular Marine Corps, and Regular Space Force, and in the grades of ensign, lieutenant (junior grade), and lieutenant in the Regular Navy (2) in paragraph (2), by striking and Regular Marine Corps in the grades of lieutenant commander, commander, and captain in the Regular Navy, and in the equivalent grades in the Regular Space Force Regular Marine Corps, and Regular Space Force, and in the grades of lieutenant commander, commander, and captain in the Regular Navy (d) Service credit upon original appointment as a commissioned officer Section 533(b)(2) of such title is amended— (1) by striking , or Marine Corps, captain in the Navy, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force Marine Corps, or Space Force or captain in the Navy (e) Positions of importance and responsibility Section 601(e) of such title is amended— (1) by striking or Marine Corps Marine Corps, or Space Force, or (2) by striking or the commensurate grades in the Space Force, (f) Convening of selection boards Section 611(a) of such title is amended by striking or Marine Corps Marine Corps, or Space Force (g) Information furnished to selection boards Section 615(a)(3) of such title is amended— (1) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking , in the case of the Navy, lieutenant, or in the case of the Space Force, the equivalent grade or, in the case of the Navy, lieutenant (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking in the case of the Navy, rear admiral, or, in the case of the Space Force, the equivalent grade or, in the case of the Navy, rear admiral (h) Special selection review boards Section 628a(a)(1)(A) of such title is amended by striking , rear admiral in the Navy, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force or rear admiral in the Navy (i) Rank: commissioned officers of the armed forces Section 741(a) of such title is amended in the table by striking and Marine Corps Marine Corps, and Space Force (j) Regular commissioned officers Section 1370 of such title is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(2), by striking rear admiral in the Navy, or the equivalent grade in the Space Force or rear admiral in the Navy (2) in subsection (b)— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking or Marine Corps, lieutenant in the Navy, or the equivalent grade in the Space Force Marine Corps, or Space Force, or lieutenant in the Navy (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking or Marine Corps, rear admiral in the Navy, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force Marine Corps, or Space Force, or rear admiral in the Navy (B) in paragraph (4), by striking or Marine Corps, captain in the Navy, or the equivalent grade in the Space Force Marine Corps, or Space Force, or captain in the Navy (C) in paragraph (5)— (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking or Marine Corps, lieutenant commander in the Navy, or the equivalent grade in the Space Force Marine Corps, or Space Force, or lieutenant commander in the Navy (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking or Marine Corps, commander or captain in the Navy, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force Marine Corps, or Space Force, or commander or captain in the Navy (iii) in subparagraph (C), by striking or Marine Corps, rear admiral (lower half) or rear admiral in the Navy Marine Corps, or Space Corps, or rear admiral (lower half) or rear admiral in the Navy (D) in paragraph (6), by striking , or an equivalent grade in the Space Force, (3) in subsection (c)(1), by striking or Marine Corps, vice admiral or admiral in the Navy, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force Marine Corps, or Space Force, or vice admiral or admiral in the Navy (4) in subsection (d)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking or Marine Corps, rear admiral in the Navy, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force Marine Corps, or Space Force, or rear admiral in the Navy (B) in paragraph (3), by striking or Marine Corps, captain in the Navy, or the equivalent grade in the Space Force Marine Corps, or Space Force, or captain in the Navy (5) in subsection (e)(2), by striking or Marine Corps, vice admiral or admiral in the Navy, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force Marine Corps, or Space Force, or vice admiral or admiral in the Navy (6) in subsection (f)— (A) in paragraph (3)— (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking or Marine Corps, rear admiral in the Navy, or the equivalent grade in the Space Force Marine Corps, or Space Force, or rear admiral in the Navy (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking or Marine Corps, vice admiral or admiral in the Navy, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force Marine Corps, or Space Force, or vice admiral or admiral in the Navy (B) in paragraph (6)— (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking or Marine Corps, rear admiral in the Navy, or the equivalent grade in the Space Force , Marine Corps, or Space Force, or rear admiral in the Navy (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking or Marine Corps, vice admiral or admiral in the Navy, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force Marine Corps, or Space Force, or vice admiral or admiral in the Navy (7) in subsection (g), by striking or Marine Corps, rear admiral in the Navy, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force Marine Corps, or Space Force, or rear admiral in the Navy (k) Officers entitled to retired pay for non-regular service Section 1370a of such title is amended— (1) in subsection (d)(1), by striking or Marine Corps Marine Corps, or Space Force (2) in subsection (h), by striking or Marine Corps Marine Corps, or Space Force (l) Retired base pay Section 1406(i)(3)(B)(v) of such title is amended by striking The senior enlisted advisor of the Space Force Chief Master Sergeant of the Space Force (m) Financial assistance program for specially selected members Section 2107 of such title is amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) by striking , as a or as a (B) by striking or Marine Corps, or as an officer in the equivalent grade in the Space Force Marine Corps, or Space Force (2) in subsection (d), by striking lieutenant, ensign, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force, lieutenant or ensign, (n) Designation of Space Systems Command as a field command of the United States Space Force Section 9016(b)(6)(B)(iv)(II) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking Space and Missile Systems Center Space Systems Command (o) Chief of Space Operations Section 9082 of such title is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking , flag, or equivalent (2) in subsection (b), by striking grade in the Space Force equivalent to the grade of general in the Army, Air Force, and Marine Corps, or admiral in the Navy grade of general (p) Distinguished flying cross Section 9279(a) of such title is amended– (1) by adding or Space Force Air Force (2) by adding or space aerial (q) Airman’s medal Section 9280(a)(1) of such title is amended by adding or Space Force Air Force (r) Retired grade of commissioned officers Section 9341 of such title is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(2), by striking or the Space Force (2) in subsection (b), by striking or Reserve (s) United States Air Force Institute of Technology: Administration Section 9414b(a)(2)(B) of such title is amended by striking or the equivalent grade in the Space Force (t) Air Force Academy permanent professors; Director of Admissions Section 9436 of such title is amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in the first sentence, by striking in the Air Force or the equivalent grade in the Space Force (B) in the second sentence— (i) by inserting or Regular Space Force Regular Air Force (ii) by striking and a permanent professor appointed from the Regular Space Force has the grade equivalent to the grade of colonel in the Regular Air Force (C) in the third sentence, by striking in the Air Force or the equivalent grade in the Space Force (2) in subsection (b)— (A) in the first sentence, by striking in the Air Force or the equivalent grade in the Space Force (B) in the second sentence— (i) by inserting or Regular Space Force Regular Air Force (ii) by striking and a permanent professor appointed from the Regular Space Force has the grade equivalent to the grade of colonel in the Regular Air Force (u) Cadets: degree and commission on graduation Section 9453(b) of such title is amended by striking in the equivalent grade in (v) Basic pay rates for enlisted members Footnote 2 of the table titled ENLISTED MEMBERS Public Law 109–364 37 U.S.C. 1009 the senior enlisted advisor of the Space Force Chief Master Sergeant of the Space Force (w) Pay of senior enlisted members Section 210(c)(5) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking the senior enlisted advisor of the Space Force the Chief Master Sergeant of the Space Force (x) Personal money allowance Section 414(b) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking the senior enlisted advisor of the Space Force the Chief Master Sergeant of the Space Force 1078. Authority to establish commercial integration cells within certain combatant commands (a) In general The Commander of the United States Africa Command, the Commander of the United States European Command, the Commander of the United States Indo-Pacific Command, the Commander of the United States Northern Command, and the Commander of the United States Southern Command may each establish— (1) a commercial integration cell within their respective combatant command for the purpose of closely integrating public and private entities with capabilities relevant to the area of operation of such combatant command; and (2) a chief technology officer position within their respective combatant command, who may— (A) oversee such commercial integration cell; and (B) report directly to the commander of the applicable combatant command. (b) Requirements and authorities In establishing the commercial integration cells under subsection (a)(1), each commander described in that paragraph may— (1) make the applicable commercial integration cell available to commercial entities with existing Government contracts up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information clearance level; (2) ensure that such commercial integration cell is an information-sharing partnership rather than a service contract; (3) in the case of a solution identified within the commercial integration cell that requires resources, work within existing resources or processes to request such resources; and (4) integrate lessons learned from the commercial integration cells of the United States Space Command and the United States Central Command. (c) Briefing Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commander of the United States Africa Command, the Commander of the United States European Command, the Commander of the United States Indo-Pacific Command, the Commander of the United States Northern Command, and the Commander of the United States Southern Command shall each provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives— (1) a briefing on whether a commercial integration cell was implemented and any related progress, including any challenges to implementation; (2) in the case of a commander of a combatant command who chooses not to use the authority provided in this section to establish a commercial integration cell or a chief technology officer— (A) an explanation for not using such authority; and (B) a description of the manner in which such commander is otherwise addressing the need to integrate commercial solutions; and (3) in the case of a combatant command that has an official performing a role similar to the role described for a chief technology officer under subsection (a)(2), a detailed description of the role performed by such official. 1079. Modification on limitation on funding for institutions of higher education hosting Confucius Institutes Section 1062 of the William M. ( Mac Public Law 116–283 10 U.S.C. 2241 1080. Modification of definition of domestic source for title III of Defense Production Act of 1950 (a) In general Section 702(7) of such Act ( 50 U.S.C. 4552(7) (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively, and by moving such clauses, as so redesignated, two ems to the right; (2) by striking The term (A) In general Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the term ; (3) in clause (ii), as redesignated by paragraph (1), by striking subparagraph (A) clause (i) (4) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph (B): (B) Domestic source for title III (i) In general For purposes of title III, the term domestic source (I) performs substantially all of the research and development, engineering, manufacturing, and production activities required of such business concern under a contract with the United States relating to a critical component or a critical technology item in— (aa) the United States or Canada; or (bb) subject to clause (ii), Australia or the United Kingdom; and (II) procures from business concerns described in subclause (I) substantially all of any components or assemblies required under a contract with the United States relating to a critical component or critical technology item. (ii) Limitations on use of business concerns in Australia and United Kingdom (I) In general A business concern described in clause (i)(I)(bb) may be treated as a domestic source only for purposes of the exercise of authorities under title III relating to national defense matters that cannot be fully addressed with business concerns described in clause (i)(I)(aa). (II) National defense matters For purposes of subclause (I), a national defense matter is a matter relating to the development or production of— (aa) a defense article, as defined in section 301 of title 10, United States Code; or (bb) a material critical to national defense or national security, as defined in section 10(f) of the Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act ( 50 U.S.C. 98h–1(f) . (b) Reports on exercise of title III authorities Title III of the Defense Production Act of 1950 ( 50 U.S.C. 4531 et seq. 305. Reports on exercise of authorities (a) In general The President, or the head of an agency to which the President has delegated authorities under this title, shall submit a report and provide a briefing to the appropriate congressional committees with respect to any action taken pursuant to such authorities— (1) except as provided by paragraph (2), not later than 30 days after taking the action; and (2) in the case of an action that involves a business concern in the United Kingdom or Australia, not later than 30 days before taking the action. (b) Elements (1) In general Each report and briefing required by subsection (a) with respect to an action described in that subsection shall include— (A) a justification of the necessity of the use of authorities under this title; and (B) a description of the financial terms of any related financial transaction. (2) Additional elements relating to business concerns in the United Kingdom or Australia Each report and briefing required by subsection (a) with respect to an action described in paragraph (2) of that subsection shall include, in addition to the elements under paragraph (1)— (A) a certification that business concerns in the United States or Canada were not available with respect to the action; and (B) an analysis of why such business concerns were not available. (c) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees (1) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives; and (2) in the case of an action described in subsection (a) involving strategic and critical materials relating to national defense matters (as described in section 702(7)(B)(ii)(II)), the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives. . 1081. Comprehensive strategy for talent development and management of Department of Defense computer programming workforce (a) Policy It shall be a policy of the Armed Forces, including the reserve components, to establish appropriate and effective talent development and management policies and practices that allow for the military departments to present an adaptable, qualified workforce training and education standard with respect to computer programming skill needs for the workforce of the Department of Defense, including technical and nontechnical skills related to artificial intelligence and software coding. (b) Strategy required (1) In general The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretaries of each military department and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall develop a strategy to achieve the policy set forth in subsection (a). (2) Elements The strategy required by paragraph (1) shall include— (A) the development, funding, and execution of a coherent approach and transparent strategy across digital platforms and applications that enable development and presentation of forces with appropriate programmatic oversight for both active and reserve component workforces; (B) the evaluation of the potential need for career field occupational codes or other service-specific talent management mechanisms aligned with the work roles related to computer programming, artificial intelligence and machine learning competency, and software engineering under the Department of Defense Cyber Workforce Framework to allow for the military departments to identify, assess, track, manage, and assign personnel with computer programming, coding, and artificial intelligence skills through established mechanisms, under the policies of the military departments with respect to career field management, including— (i) development, modification, or revalidation of a career field or separate occupational code for computer programming occupational areas aligned with such work roles; and (ii) development, modification, or revalidation of a unique special skills or experience designator or qualification, tracked independently of a career field, for computer programming occupational areas aligned with such work roles; (C) the evaluation of current talent management processes to incorporate equivalency assessment as part of the qualification standard to accommodate experiences, training, or skills developed as a result of other work experience or training opportunities, including potentially from civilian occupations or commercially-available training courses (D) assessment of members of the Armed Forces who have completed the qualification process of the military department concerned or who qualify based on existing skills and training across computer programming occupational areas; and (E) maintaining data on, and longitudinal tracking of, members of the Armed Forces described in subparagraph (D). (c) Responsibilities The Secretary of each military department, in consultation with the Assistant Secretary of the military department for Manpower and Reserve Affairs, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, and the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, shall— (1) be responsible for development and implementation of the policy set forth in subsection (a) and strategy required by subsection (b); and (2) carry out that responsibility through an officer or employee of the military department assigned by the Secretary for that purpose. (d) Duties In developing and providing for the implementation of the policy set forth in subsection (a) and strategy required by subsection (b), the Secretary of each military department, in consultation with the Assistant Secretary of the military department for Manpower and Reserve Affairs, the Chief Information Officer of the military department, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, and the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, shall establish and update relevant policies and practices to enable the talent development and management to provide a workforce capable of conducting computer programming, software coding, and artificial intelligence activities, including by meeting related manning, systems, training, and other related funding requirements. (e) Strategy and implementation plans (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of each military department shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives the strategy required by subsection (b). (2) Implementation plans required Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of each military department shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a implementation plan for the strategy required by subsection (b), including identification of resource needs and areas where current internal policy or legal statutes may need to be updated. (f) Definitions In this section: (1) Computer programming occupational area The term computer programming occupational area (A) Data scientists. (B) Data engineers. (C) Data analysts. (D) Software developers. (E) Machine learning engineers. (F) Program managers. (G) Acquisition professionals. (2) Digital platform or application The term digital platform or application (3) Qualification process The term qualification process (A) means the process, modeled on a streamlined version of the process for obtaining joint qualifications, for training and verifying members of the Armed Forces to receive career field or occupational codes associated with computer programming occupational areas; and (B) may include— (i) experiences, education, and training received as a part of military service, including fellowships, talent exchanges, positions within government, and educational courses; and (ii) in the case of members of the reserve components, experiences, education, and training received in their civilian occupations. (4) Standard The term standard 1082. Limitation on availability of funds for destruction of landmines (a) Limitation Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2024 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for the destruction of anti-personnel landmine munitions before the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report required by subsection (c). (b) Exception for safety Subsection (a) shall not apply to any anti-personnel landmine munitions that the Secretary of Defense determines are unsafe or could pose a safety risk to the United States Armed Forces if not demilitarized or destroyed. (c) Report required (1) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes each of the following: (A) A description of the policy of the Department of Defense regarding the use of anti-personnel landmines, including methods for commanders to seek waivers to use such munitions. (B) Projections covering the period of 10 years following the date of the report of— (i) the inventory levels for all anti-personnel landmine munitions, taking into account future production of anti-personnel landmine munitions, any plans for demilitarization of such munitions, the age of the munitions, storage and safety considerations, and any other factors that are expected to impact the size of the inventory; (ii) the cost to achieve the inventory levels projected in clause (i), including the cost for potential demilitarization or disposal of such munitions; and (iii) the cost to develop and produce new anti-personnel landmine munitions the Secretary determines are necessary to meet the demands of operational plans. (C) An assessment by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the effects of the inventory levels projected under subparagraph (B)(i) on operational plans. (D) Any inputs by the Chairman and the commanders of the combatant commands to a policy process that resulted in a change in landmine policy during the calendar year preceding the date of the enactment of this Act. (E) Any other matters that the Secretary determines appropriate for inclusion in the report. (2) Form of report The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (d) Briefing required (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the status, as of the date of the briefing, of research and development into operational alternatives to anti-personnel landmine munitions. (2) Form of briefing The briefing required by paragraph (1) may contain classified information. (e) Anti-personnel landmine munitions defined In this section, the term anti-personnel landmine munitions XI Civilian personnel matters 1101. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees working overseas Subsection (a) of section 1101 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( Public Law 110–417 Public Law 117–263 through 2023 through 2024 1102. One-year extension of temporary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to civilian personnel on official duty in a combat zone Paragraph (2) of section 1603(a) of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 ( Public Law 109–234 Public Law 110–417 Public Law 117–263 2024 2025 1103. Exclusion of positions in nonappropriated fund instrumentalities from limitations on dual pay Section 5531(2) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking Government corporation and Government corporation, but excluding 1104. Exception to limitation on number of Senior Executive Service positions for the Department of Defense Section 1109(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 5 U.S.C. 3133 (3) Exception The limitation under this subsection shall not apply to positions described in this subsection that are fully funded through amounts appropriated to an agency other than the Department of Defense. . 1105. Removal of Washington Headquarters Services direct support from personnel limitation on the Office of the Secretary of Defense Section 143(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “(including Direct Support Activities of that Office and the Washington Headquarters Services of the Department of Defense)”. 1106. Consolidation of direct hire authorities for candidates with specified degrees at science and technology reinvention laboratories Section 4091 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking bachelor’s degree bachelor’s or advanced degree (2) in subsection (c)— (A) in the subsection heading, by striking calendar year fiscal year (B) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking calendar year fiscal year (C) in paragraph (1), by striking 6 percent 11 percent (D) in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), by striking the fiscal year last ending before the start of such calendar year the preceding fiscal year (3) by striking subsection (f); and (4) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (f). 1107. Expansion and extension of direct hire authority for certain personnel of the Department of Defense Section 9905 of title 5, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (12) Any position in support of aircraft operations for which the Secretary determines there is a critical hiring need and shortage of candidates. (13) Any position in support of the safety of the public, law enforcement, or first response for which the Secretary determines there is a critical hiring need and shortage of candidates. (14) Any position in support of the Office of the Inspector General of the Department relating to oversight of the conflict in Ukraine for which the Secretary determines there is a critical hiring need and shortage of candidates. ; and (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking September 30, 2025 September 30, 2030 1108. Extension of direct hire authority for the Department of Defense for post-secondary students and recent graduates Section 1106(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( 10 U.S.C. 1580 September 30, 2025 September 30, 2030 1109. Extension of direct hire authority for domestic industrial base facilities and Major Range and Test Facilities Base Section 1125(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( 10 U.S.C. 1580 Public Law 114–328 through 2025, through 2028, 1110. Authority to employ civilian faculty members at Space Force schools (a) In general Section 9371 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the section heading, by inserting and Space Delta 13 Air University (2) in subsection (a), by inserting or of the Space Delta 13 Air University (3) in subsection (c)— (A) in paragraphs (1), by inserting or of the Space Delta 13 Air University (B) in paragraph (2), by inserting or of the Space Delta 13 Air University (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 947 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 9371 and inserting the following new item: 9371. Air University and Space Delta 13: civilian faculty members. . 1111. Report and sunset relating to inapplicability of certification of executive qualifications by qualification review boards of Office of Personnel Management Section 1109 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( 5 U.S.C. 3393 (1) in subsection (d)— (A) in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking paragraph (3) paragraph (4) (B) in paragraph (2), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking paragraph (3) paragraph (4) (C) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and (D) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3): (3) Additional report Not later than December 1, 2024, the Secretary shall submit to the committees of Congress specified in paragraph (4) and the Comptroller General of the United States a report on the use of the authority provided in this section. The report shall include the following: (A) The number and type of appointments made under this section between August 13, 2018, and the date of the report. (B) Data on and an assessment of whether appointments under the authority in this section reduced the time to hire when compared with the time to hire under the review system of the Office of Personnel Management in use as of the date of the report. (C) An assessment of the utility of the appointment authority and process under this section. (D) An assessment of whether the appointments made under this section resulted in higher quality new executives for the Senior Executive Service of the Department when compared with the executives produced in the Department under the review system in use between August 13, 2013, and August 13, 2018. (E) Any recommendation for the improvement of the selection and qualification process for the Senior Executive Service of the Department that the Secretary considers necessary in order to attract and hire highly qualified candidates for service in that Senior Executive Service. ; and (2) in subsection (e), by striking August 13, 2023 September 30, 2025 1112. Extension of date of first employment for acquisition of competitive status for employees of Inspectors General for overseas contingency operations Section 419(d)(5)(B) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking 2 years 5 years 1113. Expansion of noncompetitive appointment eligibility to spouses of Department of Defense civilians (a) In general Section 3330d of title 5, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the section heading, by inserting and Department of Defense civilian military (2) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following: (4) The term spouse of an employee of the Department of Defense ; and (3) in subsection (b)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking or (B) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; or (C) by adding at the end the following: (3) a spouse of an employee of the Department of Defense. . (b) Technical and conforming amendment The table of sections for subchapter I of chapter 33 3330d. Appointment of military and Department of Defense civilian spouses. . (c) OPM limitation and reports (1) Relocating spouses With respect to the noncompetitive appointment of a relocating spouse of an employee of the Department of Defense under paragraph (3) of section 3330d(b) of title 5, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), the Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall— (A) monitor the number of those appointments; (B) require the head of each agency with the authority to make those appointments under that provision to submit to the Director an annual report on those appointments, including information on the number of individuals so appointed, the types of positions filled, and the effectiveness of the authority for those appointments; and (C) not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, submit to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Oversight and Accountability of the House of Representatives a report on the use and effectiveness of the authority described in subparagraph (B). (2) Non-relocating spouses With respect to the noncompetitive appointment of a spouse of an employee of the Department of Defense other than a relocating spouse described in paragraph (1), the Director of the Office of Personnel Management— (A) shall treat the spouse as a relocating spouse under paragraph (1); and (B) may limit the number of those appointments. (d) Sunset Effective on December 31, 2028— (1) the authority provided by this section, and the amendments made by this section, shall expire; and (2) the provisions of section 3330d of title 5, United States Code, amended or repealed by this section are restored or revived as if this section had not been enacted. 1114. Elimination of Government Accountability Office review requirement relating to Department of Defense personnel authorities Section 9902(h) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking and the Comptroller General, (2) by striking paragraph (2); and (3) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2). 1115. Amendments to the John S. McCain Strategic Defense Fellows Program (a) Selection of participants Subsection (d)(2) of section 932 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( 10 U.S.C. 1580 Public Law 115–232 (2) Geographical representation Out of the total number of individuals selected to participate in the fellows program in any year, not more than 20 percent may be from any of the following geographic regions: (A) The Northeast United States. (B) The Southeast United States. (C) The Midwest United States. (D) The Southwest United States. (E) The Western United States. (F) Alaska, Hawaii, United States territories, and areas outside the United States. . (b) Appointment and career development Such section is further amended— (1) in subsection (d)(3)— (A) by striking assigned appointed (B) by striking assignment appointment (2) by amending subsections (e) and (f) to read as follows: (e) Appointment during participation in fellows program (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall appoint each individual who participates in the fellows program to an excepted service position in an element of the Department. (2) Placement opportunities Each year, the head of each element of the Department shall submit to the Secretary an identification of placement opportunities for participants in the fellows program. Such placement opportunities shall provide for leadership development and potential commencement of a career track toward a position of senior leadership in the Department. (3) Qualification requirements The Secretary, in coordination with the heads of elements of the Department, shall establish qualification requirements for the appointment of participants under paragraph (1). (4) Matching qualifications, skills, and requirements In making appointments under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall seek to best match the qualifications and skills of the participants with the requirements for positions available for appointment. (5) Term The term of each appointment under the fellows program shall be one year, but the Secretary may extend a term of appointment up to one additional year. (6) Grade The Secretary shall appoint an individual under paragraph (1) to a position at the level of GS–10, GS–11, or GS–12 of the General Schedule based on the directly related qualifications, skills, and professional experience of the individual. (7) Education loan repayment To the extent that funds are provided in advance in appropriations Acts, the Secretary may repay a loan of a participant in the fellows program if the loan is described by subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of section 16301(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code. Any repayment of a loan under this paragraph may require a minimum service agreement, as determined by the Secretary. (8) Element of the Department defined In this subsection, the term element of the Department (f) Career development (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that participants in the fellows program— (A) receive career development opportunities and support appropriate for the commencement of a career track within the Department leading toward a future position of senior leadership within the Department, including ongoing mentorship support through appropriate personnel from entities within the Department; and (B) are provided appropriate employment opportunities for excepted service positions in the Department upon successful completion of the fellows program. (2) Publication of selection The Secretary shall publish, on an internet website of the Department available to the public, the names of the individuals selected to participate in the fellows program. . 1116. Civilian Cybersecurity Reserve pilot project (a) Definition In this section, the term temporary position (b) Pilot project (1) In general The Secretary of the Army shall carry out a pilot project to establish a Civilian Cybersecurity Reserve. (2) Purpose The purpose of the Civilian Cybersecurity Reserve is to enable the Army to provide manpower to the United States Cyber Command to effectively— (A) preempt, defeat, deter, or respond to malicious cyber activity; (B) conduct cyberspace operations; (C) secure information and systems of the Department of Defense against malicious cyber activity; and (D) assist in solving cyber workforce-related challenges. (3) Hiring authority In carrying out this section, the Secretary may use any authority otherwise available to the Secretary for the recruitment, employment, and retention of civilian personnel within the Department, including authority under section 1599f of title 10, United States Code. (4) Employment protections The Secretary of Labor shall prescribe such regulations as necessary to ensure the reemployment, continuation of benefits, and non-discrimination in reemployment of individuals appointed under this section, provided that such regulations shall include, at a minimum, those rights and obligations set forth under chapter 43 (5) Status in reserve During the period beginning on the date on which an individual is recruited to serve in the Civilian Cybersecurity Reserve and ending on the date on which the individual is appointed under this section, and during any period in between any such appointments, the individual shall not be considered a Federal employee. (c) Eligibility; application and selection (1) In general Under the pilot project required under subsection (b)(1), the Secretary of the Army shall establish criteria for— (A) individuals to be eligible for the Civilian Cybersecurity Reserve; and (B) the application and selection processes for the Civilian Cybersecurity Reserve. (2) Requirements for individuals The criteria established under paragraph (1)(A) with respect to an individual shall include— (A) if the individual has previously served as a member of the Civilian Cybersecurity Reserve, that the previous appointment ended not less than 60 days before the individual may be appointed for a subsequent temporary position in the Civilian Cybersecurity Reserve; and (B) cybersecurity expertise. (3) Prescreening The Secretary shall— (A) conduct a prescreening of each individual prior to appointment under this section for any topic or product that would create a conflict of interest; and (B) require each individual appointed under this section to notify the Secretary if a potential conflict of interest arises during the appointment. (4) Agreement required An individual may become a member of the Civilian Cybersecurity Reserve only if the individual enters into an agreement with the Secretary to become such a member, which shall set forth the rights and obligations of the individual and the Army. (5) Exception for continuing military service commitments A member of the Selected Reserve under section 10143 of title 10, United States Code, may not be a member of the Civilian Cybersecurity Reserve. (6) Prohibition Any individual who is an employee of the executive branch may not be recruited or appointed to serve in the Civilian Cybersecurity Reserve. (d) Security clearances (1) In general The Secretary of the Army shall ensure that all members of the Civilian Cybersecurity Reserve undergo the appropriate personnel vetting and adjudication commensurate with the duties of the position, including a determination of eligibility for access to classified information where a security clearance is necessary, according to applicable policy and authorities. (2) Cost of sponsoring clearances If a member of the Civilian Cybersecurity Reserve requires a security clearance in order to carry out the duties of the member, the Army shall be responsible for the cost of sponsoring the security clearance of the member. (e) Implementation plan (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives the report required under section 1540(d)(2) of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 (A) submit to the congressional defense committees an implementation plan for the pilot project required under subsection (b)(1); and (B) provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the implementation plan. (2) Prohibition The Secretary of the Army may not take any action to begin implementation of the pilot project required under subsection (b)(1) until the Secretary fulfills the requirements under paragraph (1). (f) Project guidance Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall, in consultation with the Office of Personnel Management and the Office of Government Ethics, issue guidance establishing and implementing the pilot project required under subsection (b)(1). (g) Briefings and report (1) Briefings Not later than one year after the date on which the guidance required under subsection (f) is issued, and every year thereafter until the date on which the pilot project required under subsection (b)(1) terminates under subsection (i), the Secretary of the Army shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on activities carried out under the pilot project, including— (A) participation in the Civilian Cybersecurity Reserve, including the number of participants, the diversity of participants, and any barriers to recruitment or retention of members; (B) an evaluation of the ethical requirements of the pilot project; (C) whether the Civilian Cybersecurity Reserve has been effective in providing additional capacity to the Army; and (D) an evaluation of the eligibility requirements for the pilot project. (2) Report Not earlier than 180 days and not later than 90 days before the date on which the pilot project required under subsection (b)(1) terminates under subsection (i), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report and provide a briefing on recommendations relating to the pilot project, including recommendations for— (A) whether the pilot project should be modified, extended in duration, or established as a permanent program, and if so, an appropriate scope for the program; (B) how to attract participants, ensure a diversity of participants, and address any barriers to recruitment or retention of members of the Civilian Cybersecurity Reserve; (C) the ethical requirements of the pilot project and the effectiveness of mitigation efforts to address any conflict of interest concerns; and (D) an evaluation of the eligibility requirements for the pilot project. (h) Evaluation Not later than three years after the pilot project required under subsection (b)(1) is established, the Comptroller General of the United States shall— (1) conduct a study evaluating the pilot project; and (2) submit to Congress— (A) a report on the results of the study; and (B) a recommendation with respect to whether the pilot project should be modified. (i) Sunset The pilot project required under subsection (b)(1) shall terminate on the date that is four years after the date on which the pilot project is established. XII Matters relating to foreign nations A Assistance and training 1201. Middle East integrated maritime domain awareness and interdiction capability (a) In general The Secretary of Defense, using existing authorities, shall seek to build upon the incorporation of Israel into the area of responsibility of the United States Central Command to develop a Middle East integrated maritime domain awareness and interdiction capability for the purpose of protecting the people, infrastructure, and territory of such countries from— (1) manned and unmanned naval systems, undersea warfare capabilities, and anti-ship missiles of Iran and groups affiliated with Iran; and (2) violent extremist organizations, criminal networks, and piracy activities that threaten lawful commerce in the waterways within the area of responsibility of the United States Naval Forces Central Command. (b) Strategy (1) In general Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a strategy for the cooperation described in subsection (a). (2) Matters to be included The strategy required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An assessment of the threats posed to ally or partner countries in the Middle East by— (i) manned and unmanned naval systems, undersea warfare capabilities, and anti-ship missiles of Iran and groups affiliated with Iran; and (ii) violent extremist organizations, criminal networks, and piracy activities that threaten lawful commerce in the waterways within the area of responsibility of the United States Naval Forces Central Command. (B) A description of existing multilateral maritime partnerships currently led by the United States Naval Forces Central Command, including the Combined Maritime Forces (including its associated Task Forces 150, 151, 152, and 153), the International Maritime Security Construct, and the Navy's Task Force 59, and a discussion of the role of such partnerships in building an integrated maritime security capability. (C) A description of progress made in advancing the integration of Israel into the existing multilateral maritime partnerships described in subparagraph (B). (D) A description of efforts among countries in the Middle East to coordinate intelligence, reconnaissance, and surveillance capabilities and indicators and warnings with respect to the threats described in subparagraph (A), and a description of any impediment to optimizing such efforts. (E) A description of the current Department of Defense systems that, in coordination with ally and partner countries in the Middle East— (i) provide awareness of and defend against such threats; and (ii) address current capability gaps. (F) An explanation of the manner in which an integrated maritime domain awareness and interdiction architecture would improve collective security in the Middle East. (G) A description of existing and planned efforts to engage ally and partner countries in the Middle East in establishing such an architecture. (H) An identification of the elements of such an architecture that may be acquired and operated by ally and partner countries in the Middle East, and a list of such elements for each such ally and partner. (I) An identification of the elements of such an architecture that may only be provided and operated by members of the United States Armed Forces. (J) An identification of any challenge to optimizing such an architecture in the Middle East. (K) An assessment of progress and key challenges in the implementation of the strategy required by paragraph (1) using the metrics identified in accordance with paragraph (3). (L) Recommendations for improvements in the implementation of such strategy based on such metrics. (M) An assessment of any capabilities or lessons from the Navy’s Task Force 59 that may be leveraged to support an integrated maritime domain awareness and interdiction capability in the Middle East. (N) Any other matter the Secretary of Defense considers relevant. (3) Metrics The Secretary of Defense shall identify metrics to assess progress in the implementation of the strategy required by paragraph (1). (4) Format The strategy required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex. (c) Feasibility study (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study on the feasibility and advisability of establishing an integrated maritime domain awareness and interdiction capability to protect the people, infrastructure, and territory of ally and partner countries in the Middle East from— (A) manned and unmanned naval systems, undersea warfare capabilities, and anti-ship missiles of Iran and groups affiliated with Iran; and (B) violent extremist organizations, criminal networks, and piracy activities that threaten lawful commerce in the waterways of the Middle East. (2) Elements The study required by paragraph (1) shall include— (A) an assessment of funds that could be contributed by ally and partner countries of the United States; and (B) a cost estimate of establishing such an integrated maritime domain awareness and interdiction capability. (3) Report Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the results of the study conducted under paragraph (1). (d) Protection of sensitive information Any activity carried out under this section shall be conducted in a manner that appropriately protects sensitive information and the national security interests of the United States. (e) Appropriate committees of Congress defined In this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress (1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1202. Authority to provide mission training through distributed simulation (a) Authority for training and distribution To enhance the interoperability and integration between the United States Armed Forces and the military forces of friendly foreign countries, the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, is authorized— (1) to provide to military personnel of a friendly foreign government persistent advanced networked training and exercise activities (in this section referred to as mission training through distributed simulation (2) to provide information technology, including hardware and computer software developed for mission training through distributed simulation activities. (b) Scope of mission training Mission training through distributed simulation provided under subsection (a) may include advanced distributed network training events and computer-assisted exercises. (c) Applicability of export control authorities The provision of mission training through distributed simulation and information technology under this section shall be subject to the Arms Export Control Act ( 22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq. (d) Guidance on use of authority Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop and issue guidance on the procedures for the use of the authority provided in this section. (e) Report (1) In general Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the use of mission training through distributed simulation by military personnel of friendly foreign countries. (2) Elements The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A description of ongoing mission training through distributed simulation activities between the United States Armed Forces and the military forces of friendly foreign countries. (B) A description of the current capabilities of the military forces of friendly foreign countries to support mission training through distributed simulation activities with the United States Armed Forces. (C) A description of the manner in which the Department intends to use mission training through distributed simulation activities to support implementation of the National Defense Strategy, including in areas of responsibility of the United States European Command and the United States Indo-Pacific Command. (D) Any recommendation of the Secretary of Defense for legislative proposals or policy guidance regarding the use of mission training through distributed simulation activities. (3) Appropriate committees of Congress defined In this subsection, the term appropriate committees of Congress (A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. (f) Sunset The authority provided in this section shall terminate on December 31, 2025. 1203. Increase in small-scale construction limit and modification of authority to build capacity (a) Definition of small-scale construction Section 301(8) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking $1,500,000 $2,000,000 (b) Modification of authority to build capacity (1) In general Subsection (a) of section 333 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) in paragraph (3), by inserting or other counter-illicit trafficking operations (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (10) Foreign internal defense operations. . (2) Increase in threshold for small-scale construction projects requiring additional documentation Subsection (e)(8) of such section is amended by striking $750,000 $1,000,000 (3) Equipment disposition Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (h) Equipment disposition The Secretary of Defense may treat as stocks of the Department of Defense— (1) equipment procured to carry out a program pursuant to subsection (a) that has not yet been transferred to a foreign country and is no longer needed to support such program or any other program carried out pursuant to such subsection; and (2) equipment that has been transferred to a foreign country to carry out a program pursuant to subsection (a) and is returned by the foreign country to the United States. . (4) International agreements Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (i) International agreements (1) In general The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may— (A) allow a foreign country to provide sole-source direction for assistance in support of a program carried out pursuant to subsection (a); and (B) enter into an agreement with a foreign country to provide such sole-source direction. (2) Notification Not later than 72 hours after the Secretary of Defense enters into an agreement under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a written notification that includes the following: (A) A description of the parameters of the agreement, including types of support, objectives, and duration of support and cooperation under the agreement. (B) A description and justification of any anticipated use of sole-source direction pursuant to such agreement. (C) A determination as to whether the anticipated costs to incurred under the agreement are fair and reasonable. (D) A certification that the agreement is in the national security interests of the United States. (E) Any other matter relating to the agreement, as determined by the Secretary of Defense. . (5) Foreign internal defense defined Such section is further amended by adding at the end of the following new subsection: (j) Foreign internal defense defined In this section, the term foreign internal defense Joint Publication 3–22 Foreign Internal Defense . 1204. Extension of legal institutional capacity building initiative for foreign defense institutions Section 1210(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 December 31, 2024 December 31, 2028 1205. Extension and modification of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations (a) Extension Subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( Public Law 110–181 beginning on October 1, 2022, and ending on December 31, 2023 beginning on October 1, 2023, and ending on December 31, 2024 (b) Modification to limitation Subsection (d)(1) of such section is amended— (1) by striking beginning on October 1, 2022, and ending on December 31, 2023 beginning on October 1, 2023, and ending on December 31, 2024 (2) by striking $30,000,000 $15,000,000 1206. Extension of authority for Department of Defense support for stabilization activities in national security interest of the United States Section 1210A(h) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 December 31, 2023 December 31, 2025 1207. Extension of cross servicing agreements for loan of personnel protection and personnel survivability equipment in coalition operations Section 1207(f) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck Public Law 113–291 10 U.S.C. 2342 December 31, 2024 December 31, 2029 1208. Limitation on availability of funds for International Security Cooperation Program Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2024 for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide, and available for the Defense Security Cooperation Agency for the International Security Cooperation Program, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of Defense submits the security cooperation strategy for each covered combatant command required by section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 1209. Modification of Department of Defense security cooperation workforce development Section 384 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (d)— (A) by striking The Program (1) In general The Program ; and (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (2) Managing entity (A) Designation The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy and the Director of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency, shall designate an entity within the Department of Defense to serve as the lead entity for managing the implementation of the Program. (B) Duties The entity designated under subparagraph (A) shall carry out the management and implementation of the Program, consistent with objectives formulated by the Secretary of Defense, which shall include the following: (i) Providing for comprehensive tracking of and accounting for all Department of Defense employees engaged in the security cooperation enterprise. (ii) Providing training requirements specified at the requisite proficiency levels for each position. (C) Reporting The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that, not less frequently than annually, each military department, combatant command, defense agency, and any other entity involved in managing the security cooperation workforce submits to the entity designated under subparagraph (A) a report containing information necessary for the management and career development of the security cooperation workforce, as determined by the Director of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency. (3) Security cooperation workforce management information system The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency, shall prescribe regulations to ensure that each military department, combatant command, and defense agency provides standardized information and data to the Secretary on persons serving in positions within the security cooperation workforce. ; (2) in subsection (e), by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) Updated guidance (A) In general Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this paragraph, and biannually thereafter through fiscal year 2028, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall issue updated guidance for the execution and administration of the Program. (B) Scope The updated guidance required by subparagraph (A) shall— (i) fulfill each requirement set forth in paragraph (3), as appropriate; and (ii) include an identification of the manner in which the Department of Defense shall ensure that personnel assigned to security cooperation offices within embassies of the United States are trained and managed to a level of proficiency that is at least equal to the level of proficiency provided to the attaché workforce by the Defense Attaché Service. ; (3) by redesignating subsections (f) through (h) as subsections (h) through (j), respectively; and (4) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsections (f) and (g): (f) Foreign Military Sales Center of Excellence (1) Establishment The Secretary of Defense shall direct an existing schoolhouse within the Department of Defense to serve as a Foreign Military Sales Center of Excellence to improve the training and education of personnel engaged in foreign military sales planning and execution. (2) Objectives The objectives of the Foreign Military Sales Center of Excellence shall include— (A) conducting research on and promoting best practices for ensuring that foreign military sales are timely and effective; and (B) enhancing existing curricula for the purpose of ensuring that the foreign military sales workforce is fully trained and prepared to execute the foreign military sales program. (g) Defense Security Cooperation University (1) Charter The Secretary of Defense shall develop and promulgate a charter for the operation of the Defense Security Cooperation University. (2) Mission The charter required by paragraph (1) shall set forth the mission, and associated structures and organizations, of the Defense Security Cooperation University, which shall include— (A) management and implementation of international military training and education security cooperation programs and authorities executed by the Department of Defense; (B) management and provision of institutional capacity-building services executed by the Department of Defense; and (C) advancement of the profession of security cooperation through research, data collection, analysis, publication, and learning. (3) Cooperative research and development arrangements (A) In general In engaging in research and development projects pursuant to subsection (a) of section 4001 of this title by a contract, cooperative agreement, or grant pursuant to subsection (b)(1) of such section, the Secretary of Defense may enter into such contract or cooperative agreement, or award such grant, through the Defense Security Cooperation University. (B) Treatment as Government-operated Federal laboratory The Defense Security Cooperation University shall be considered a Government-operated Federal laboratory for purposes of section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 ( 15 U.S.C. 3710a (4) Acceptance of research grants (A) In general The Secretary of Defense, through the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, may authorize the President of the Defense Security Cooperation University to accept qualifying research grants. Any such grant may only be accepted if the work under the grant is to be carried out by a professor or instructor of the Defense Security Cooperation University for a scientific, literary, or educational purpose. (B) Qualifying grants A qualifying research grant under this paragraph is a grant that is awarded on a competitive basis by an entity described in subparagraph (C) for a research project with a scientific, literary, or educational purpose. (C) Entities from which grants may be accepted A grant may be accepted under this paragraph only from a corporation, fund, foundation, educational institution, or similar entity that is organized and operated primarily for scientific, literary, or educational purposes. (D) Administration of grant funds The Director of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency shall establish an account for administering funds received as research grants under this section. The President of the Defense Security Cooperation University shall use the funds in the account in accordance with applicable provisions of the regulations and the terms and condition of the grants received. (E) Related expenses Subject to such limitations as may be provided in appropriations Acts, appropriations available for the Defense Security Cooperation University may be used to pay expenses incurred by the Defense Security Cooperation University in applying for, and otherwise pursuing, the award of qualifying research grants. (F) Regulations The Secretary of Defense, through the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, shall prescribe regulations for the administration of this section. . 1210. Modification of authority to provide support to certain governments for border security operations Section 1226(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( 22 U.S.C. 2151 (G) To the Government of Tajikistan for purposes of supporting and enhancing efforts of the armed forces of Tajikistan to increase security and sustain increased security along the border of Tajikistan and Afghanistan. (H) To the Government of Uzbekistan for purposes of supporting and enhancing efforts of the armed forces of Uzbekistan to increase security and sustain increased security along the border of Uzbekistan and Afghanistan. (I) To the Government of Turkmenistan for purposes of supporting and enhancing efforts of the armed forces of Turkmenistan to increase security and sustain increased security along the border of Turkmenistan and Afghanistan. . 1211. Modification of Defense Operational Resilience International Cooperation Pilot Program Section 1212 of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–236 10 U.S.C. 311 (1) in subsection (a), by striking military forces national security forces (2) in subsection (c)— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking military-to-military relationships relationships with the national security forces of partner countries (ii) in subparagraph (C), by striking military forces national security forces (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) Sustainment and non-lethal assistance A program under subsection (a) may include the provision of sustainment and non-lethal assistance, including training, defense services, supplies (including consumables), and small-scale construction (as such terms are defined in section 301 of title 10, United States Code). ; (3) in subsection (e)(3)(A), by striking military force national security forces (4) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (g) National security forces defined In this section, the term national security forces . 1212. Assistance to Israel for aerial refueling (a) Training Israeli pilots to operate KC–46 aircraft (1) In general The Secretary of the Air Force shall— (A) make available sufficient resources and accommodations within the United States to train members of the Israeli Air Force on the operation of KC–46 aircraft; (B) conduct training for members of the Israeli Air Force, including— (i) training for pilots and crew on the operation of the KC–46 aircraft in accordance with standards considered sufficient to conduct coalition operations of the United States Air Force and the Israeli Air Force; and (ii) training for ground personnel on the maintenance and sustainment requirements of the KC–46 aircraft considered sufficient for such operations; and (C) conduct the timing of such training so as to ensure that the first group of trainee members of the Israeli Air Force is anticipated to complete the training not later than 2 weeks after the date on which the first KC–46 aircraft is delivered to Israel. (2) United States Air Force military personnel exchange program The Secretary of Defense shall, with respect to members of the Israeli Air Force associated with the operation of KC–46 aircraft— (A) before the completion of the training required by paragraph (1)(B), authorize the participation of such members of the Israeli Air Force in the United States Air Force Military Personnel Exchange Program; (B) make available billets in the United States Air Force Military Personnel Exchange Program necessary for such members of the Israeli Air Force to participate in such program; and (C) to the extent practicable, ensure that such members of the Israeli Air Force are able to participate in the United States Air Force Military Personnel Exchange Program immediately after such members complete such training. (3) Termination This subsection shall cease to have effect on the date that is ten years after the date of the enactment of this Act. (b) Briefing Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a briefing that includes the following: (1) An assessment of— (A) the current operational requirements of the Government of Israel for aerial refueling; and (B) any gaps in current or near-term capabilities. (2) The estimated date of delivery to Israel of KC–46 aircraft procured by the Government of Israel. (3) A detailed description of— (A) any actions the United States Government is taking to expedite the delivery to Israel of KC–46 aircraft procured by the Government of Israel, while minimizing adverse impacts to United States defense readiness, including strategic forces readiness; (B) any additional actions the United States Government could take to expedite such delivery; and (C) additional authorities Congress could provide to help expedite such delivery. (4) A description of the availability of any United States aerial refueling tanker aircraft that is retired or is expected to be retired during the two-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act that could be provided to Israel. (c) Forward deployment of United States KC–46 aircraft to Israel (1) Briefing Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a briefing that describes the capacity of and requirements for the United States Air Force to forward deploy KC–46 aircraft to Israel on a rotational basis until the date on which a KC–46 aircraft procured by the Government of Israel is commissioned into the Israeli Air Force and achieves full combat capability. (2) Rotational forces (A) In general Subject to subparagraphs (B) and (C), the Secretary of Defense shall, consistent with maintaining United States defense readiness, rotationally deploy one or more KC–46 aircraft to Israel until the earlier of— (i) the date on which a KC–46 aircraft procured by the military forces of Israel is commissioned into such military forces and achieves full combat capability; or (ii) five years after the date of the enactment of this Act. (B) Limitation The Secretary of Defense may only carry out a rotational deployment under subparagraph (A) if the Government of Israel consents to the deployment. (C) Presence The Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Government of Israel to determine the length of rotational deployments of United States KC–46 aircraft to Israel until the applicable date under subparagraph (A). B Matters relating to Syria, Iraq, and Iran 1221. Extension and modification of authority to provide assistance to vetted Syrian groups and individuals (a) Extension Subsection (a) of section 1209 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck Public Law 113–291 December 31, 2023 December 31, 2024 (b) Limitation on cost of construction and repair projects Subsection (l)(3) of such section is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking The President if the President The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitations under paragraph (1) for the purposes of providing support under subsection (a)(4) if the Secretary (2) by striking subparagraph (B); (3) in subparagraph (C), by striking as required by subparagraph (B)(ii)(I) (4) in subparagraph (D), by striking December 31, 2023 December 31, 2024 (5) by redesignating subparagraphs (C) and (D) as subparagraphs (B) and (C), respectively. 1222. Extension of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq (a) Limitation on amount Subsection (c) of section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ( 10 U.S.C. 113 (1) by striking fiscal year 2023 fiscal year 2024 (2) by striking $25,000,000 $18,000,000 (b) Source of funds Subsection (d) of such section is amended by striking fiscal year 2023 fiscal year 2024 1223. Extension and modification of authority to provide assistance to counter the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (a) In general Subsection (a) of section 1236 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck Public Law 113–291 (1) by inserting equipment and training to counter threats from unmanned aerial systems, and sustainment (2) by striking December 31, 2023 December 31, 2024 (b) Funding Subsection (g) of such section is amended by striking Overseas Contingency Operations for fiscal year 2023, there are authorized to be appropriated $358,000,000 fiscal year 2024, there is authorized to be appropriated $241,950,000 (c) Foreign contributions Subsection (h) of such section is amended— (1) by striking The Secretary (1) In general The Secretary ; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) Use of contributions The limitations on costs under subsections (a) and (m) shall not apply with respect to the expenditure of foreign contributions in excess of such limitations. . (d) Waiver authority Subsection (o) of such section is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking The President if the President The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitations on costs under subsection (a) or (m) if the Secretary (2) by striking paragraph (3); (3) in paragraph (4), by striking as required by paragraph (3)(B)(i) (4) in paragraph (5), by striking December 31, 2023 December 31, 2024 (5) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively. (e) Notification of provision of counter unmanned aerial systems training and assistance Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (p) Notification of provision of counter unmanned aerial systems training and assistance (1) In general Not later than 30 days after providing assistance under this section for countering threats from unmanned aerial systems, the Secretary of Defense shall notify the appropriate congressional committees of such provision of assistance. (2) Elements The notification required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An identification of the military forces being provided such assistance. (B) A description of the type of such assistance, including the types of training and equipment, being provided. . 1224. Briefing on nuclear capability of Iran Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives with— (1) a briefing on— (A) threats to global security posed by the nuclear weapon capability of Iran; and (B) progress made by Iran in enriching uranium at levels proximate to or exceeding weapons grade; and (2) recommendations for actions the United States may take to ensure that Iran does not acquire a nuclear weapon capability. C Matters relating to Europe and the Russian Federation 1231. Extension and modification of Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (a) Funding Subsection (f) of section 1250 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( Public Law 114–92 (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking for overseas contingency operations (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (9) For fiscal year 2024, $300,000,000. . (b) Termination of authority Subsection (h) of such section is amended by striking December 31, 2024 December 31, 2027 1232. Extension and modification of training for Eastern European national security forces in the course of multilateral exercises Section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( 10 U.S.C. 333 (1) in subsection (c)(1), by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (C) The Republic of Kosovo. ; and (2) in subsection (h)— (A) in the first sentence, by striking December 31, 2024 December 31, 2026 (B) in the second sentence, by striking December 31, 2024. December 31, 2026 1233. Extension of prohibition on availability of funds relating to sovereignty of the Russian Federation over internationally recognized territory of Ukraine Section 1245(a) of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–236 None of the funds 2023 None of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2023 or 2024 1234. Extension and modification of temporary authorizations related to Ukraine and other matters Section 1244 of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 (1) in subsection (a)(7), by striking September 30, 2024 September 30, 2025 (2) in subsection (c)(1)— (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting or fiscal year 2024 fiscal year 2023 (B) in subparagraph (P), by striking ; and (C) in subparagraph (Q), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and (D) by inserting at the end the following new subparagraphs: (R) 3,300 Tomahawk Cruise Missiles; (S) 1,100 Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM); (T) 550 Mark 48 Torpedoes; (U) 1,650 RIM-162 Evolved Sea Sparrow Missiles (ESSM); (V) 1,980 RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missiles (RAM); and (W) 11,550 Small Diameter Bomb IIs (SDB-II). . 1235. Prioritization for basing, training, and exercises in North Atlantic Treaty Organization member countries (a) In general Subject to subsection (b), when considering decisions related to United States military basing, training, and exercises, the Secretary of Defense shall prioritize those North Atlantic Treaty Organization member countries that have achieved defense spending of not less than 2 percent of their gross domestic product by 2024. (b) Waiver The Secretary of Defense may waive subsection (a) if the Secretary submits a certification to the congressional defense committees that a waiver is in the national security interests of the United States. 1236. Study and report on lessons learned regarding information operations and deterrence (a) Study (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into a contract or other agreement with an eligible entity to conduct an independent study on lessons learned from information operations conducted by the United States, Ukraine, the Russian Federation, and member countries of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization during the lead-up to the Russian Federation's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and throughout the conflict. (2) Element The study required by paragraph (1) shall include recommendations for improvements to United States information operations to enhance effectiveness, as well as recommendations on how information operations may be improved to support the maintenance of deterrence. (b) Report (1) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the results of the study in its entirety, along with any such comments as the Secretary considers relevant. (2) Form The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex. (c) Eligible entity defined In this section, the term eligible entity (1) means an entity independent of the Department of Defense that is not under the direction or control of the Secretary of Defense; and (2) an independent, nongovernmental institute described in section 501(c)(3) 1237. Report on progress on multi-year strategy and plan for Baltic security cooperation (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the progress made in the implementation of the multi-year strategy and spending plan set forth in the June 2021 report of the Department of Defense entitled Report to Congress on the Baltic Security Initiative (b) Elements The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An identification of any significant change to the goals, objectives, and milestones identified in the June 2021 report described in subsection (a). (2) An update on the Department of Defense funding allocated for such strategy and spending plan for fiscal years 2022 and 2023 and projected funding requirements for fiscal years 2024, 2025, and 2026 for each goal identified in such report. (3) An update on the host country funding allocated and planned for each such goal. (4) An assessment of the progress made in the implementation of the recommendations set forth in the fiscal year 2020 Baltic Defense Assessment, and reaffirmed in the June 2021 report described in subsection (a), that each Baltic country should— (A) increase its defense budget; (B) focus on and budget for sustainment of capabilities in defense planning; and (C) consider combined units for expensive capabilities such as air defense, rocket artillery, and engineer assets. 1238. Sense of the Senate on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) the success of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is critical to advancing United States national security objectives in Europe, the Indo-Pacific region, and around the world; (2) the North Atlantic Treaty Organization remains the strongest and most successful military alliance in the world, founded on a commitment by its members to uphold the principles of democracy, individual liberty, and the rule of law; (3) the United States reaffirms its ironclad commitment— (A) to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as the foundation of transatlantic security; and (B) to upholding its obligations under the North Atlantic Treaty, including Article 5; (4) the unprovoked and illegal invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation has upended security in Europe and requires the full attention of the transatlantic alliance; (5) welcoming Finland as the 31st member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization has made the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Alliance stronger and the remaining North Atlantic Treaty Organization member countries should swiftly ratify the accession protocols of Sweden so as to bolster the collective security of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization by increasing the security and stability of the Baltic Sea region and Northern Europe; (6) the North Atlantic Treaty Organization member countries that have not yet met the two-percent defense spending pledge, as agreed to at the 2014 Wales Summit, should endeavor to meet the timeline as expeditiously as possible, but certainly within the five-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act; (7) the United States and North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies and partners should continue efforts to identify, synchronize, and deliver needed assistance to Ukraine as Ukraine continues the fight against the illegal and unjust war of the Russian Federation; (8) the Strategic Concept, agreed to by all North Atlantic Treaty Organization member countries at the Madrid Summit in 2022, outlined the focus of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization for the upcoming decade, and North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies should continue to implement the strategies outlined, including by making efforts to address the challenges posed by the coercive policies of the People's Republic of China that undermine the interests, security, and shared values of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Alliance; (9) the United States and North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies should continue long-term efforts— (A) to improve interoperability among the military forces of member countries of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization so as to enhance collective operations, including the divestment of Soviet-era capabilities; (B) to enhance security sector cooperation and explore opportunities to reinforce civil sector preparedness and resilience measures that may be likely targets of malign influence campaigns; (C) to mitigate the impact of hybrid warfare operations, particularly those in the information and cyber domains; and (D) to expand joint research and development initiatives with a focus on emerging technologies such as quantum computing, artificial intelligence, and machine learning, including through the work of the Defence Innovation Accelerator for the North Atlantic initiative (commonly known as DIANA (10) the European Deterrence Initiative remains critically important and has demonstrated its unique value to the United States and North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies during the current Russian Federation-created war against Ukraine; (11) the United States should continue to work with North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies, and other allies and partners, to build permanent mechanisms to strengthen supply chains, enhance supply chain security, and fill supply chain gaps; (12) the United States should prioritize collaboration with North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies to secure enduring and robust critical munitions supply chains so as to increase military readiness; (13) the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization should expand cooperation efforts on cybersecurity issues to prevent adversaries and criminals from compromising critical systems and infrastructure; and (14) it is in the interest of the United States that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization adopt a robust strategy toward the Black Sea, and the United States should also consider working with interested partner countries to advance a coordinated strategy inclusive of diverse elements of transatlantic security architecture in the Black Sea region. 1239. Sense of the Senate on Defence Innovation Accelerator for the North Atlantic (DIANA) in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) the new initiative within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) to establish a new research and development initiative, known as the Defence Innovation Accelerator for the North Atlantic (DIANA), is an important step in aligning the industry and academic innovation communities of the NATO member states towards common goals for identifying, experimenting, and transitioning critical technologies of importance to NATO; (2) DIANA will spur increased defense research and development funding to rapidly adapt to a new era of strategic competition by bringing defense personnel together with NATO’s leading entrepreneurs and academic researchers; (3) DIANA will also increase opportunities for engagement on NATO’s priority technology areas, including artificial intelligence, data, autonomy, quantum-enabled technologies, biotechnology, hypersonic technologies, space, novel materials and manufacturing, and energy and propulsion; and (4) through DIANA, NATO allies will foster innovative ecosystems and develop talent for dual use technologies to maintain NATO’s strategic advantage. 1240. Sense of the Senate regarding the arming of Ukraine It is the sense of the Senate that Ukraine would derive military benefit from the provision of munitions such as the dual-purpose improved conventional munition (DPICM). Such weapons could be fired from systems in the existing Ukrainian inventory and would enhance Ukraine’s stockpile of available munitions and would bolster Ukraine’s efforts to end Russia’s illegal and unjust war. The Department of Defense, in concert with the other members of the Ukraine Defense Contract Group, should continue to support Ukraine’s brave fight to defeat the invasion of the Russian Federation. The Department of Defense, in close coordination with the State Department, should assess the feasibility and advisability of providing such munitions, including giving appropriate attention to humanitarian considerations, including supporting Ukraine’s effort to end the widespread suffering of the Ukrainian people by bringing Russia’s war of choice to an end as soon as possible on terms favorable to Ukraine, as well as the views of other members of the Ukraine Defense Contract Group. D Matters relating to the Indo-Pacific region 1241. Indo-Pacific Campaigning Initiative (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall establish, and the Commander of the United States Indo-Pacific Command shall carry out, an Indo-Pacific Campaigning Initiative (in this section referred to as the Initiative (1) strengthening United States alliances and partnerships with foreign military partners in the Indo-Pacific region; (2) deterring military aggression by potential adversaries against the United States and allies and partners of the United States; (3) dissuading strategic competitors from seeking to achieve their objectives through the conduct of military activities below the threshold of traditional armed conflict; (4) improving the understanding of the United States Armed Forces with respect to the operating environment in the Indo-Pacific region; (5) shaping the perception of potential adversaries with respect to United States military capabilities and the military capabilities of allies and partners of the United States in the Indo-Pacific region; and (6) improving the ability of the United States Armed Forces to coordinate and operate with foreign military partners in the Indo-Pacific region. (b) Briefing and report (1) Briefing Not later than March 1, 2024, the Secretary shall provide the congressional defense committees with a briefing that describes ongoing and planned campaigning activities in the Indo-Pacific region for fiscal year 2024. (2) Report Not later than December 1, 2024, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that— (A) summarizes the campaigning activities conducted in the Indo-Pacific region during fiscal year 2024; and (B) includes— (i) a value assessment of each such activity; (ii) lessons learned in carrying out such activities; (iii) any identified resource or authority gap that has negatively impacted the implementation of the Initiative; and (iv) proposed plans for additional campaigning activities in the Indo-Pacific region to fulfill the purposes described in subsection (a). (c) Campaigning defined In this section, the term campaigning (1) means the conduct and sequencing of logically linked military activities to achieve strategy-aligned objectives, including modifying the security environment over time to the benefit of the United States and the allies and partners of the United States while limiting, frustrating, and disrupting competitor activities; and (2) includes deliberately planned military activities in the Indo-Pacific region involving bilateral and multilateral engagements with foreign partners, training, exercises, demonstrations, experiments, and other activities to achieve the objectives described in subsection (a). 1242. Training, advising, and institutional capacity-building program for military forces of Taiwan (a) Establishment Consistent with the Taiwan Relations Act ( 22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq. Public Law 117–263 chapter 16 (b) Purposes The purposes of the program established under subsection (a) shall be— (1) to enable a layered defense of Taiwan by the military forces of Taiwan, including in support of the use of an asymmetric defense strategy; (2) to enhance interoperability between the United States Armed Forces and the military forces of Taiwan; (3) to encourage information sharing between the United States Armed Forces and the military forces of Taiwan; (4) to promote joint force employment; and (5) to improve professional military education and the civilian control of the military. (c) Elements The program established under subsection (a) shall include efforts to improve— (1) the tactical proficiency of the military forces of Taiwan; (2) the operational employment of the military forces of Taiwan to conduct a layered defense of Taiwan, including in support of an asymmetric defense strategy; (3) the employment of joint military capabilities by the military forces of Taiwan, including through joint military training, exercises, and planning; (4) the reform and integration of the reserve military forces of Taiwan; (5) the use of defense articles and services transferred from the United States to Taiwan; (6) the integration of the military forces of Taiwan with relevant civilian agencies, including the All-Out Defense Mobilization Agency; (7) the ability of Taiwan to participate in bilateral and multilateral military exercises, as appropriate; (8) the defensive cyber capabilities and practices of the Ministry of National Defense of Taiwan; and (9) any other matter the Secretary of Defense considers relevant. (d) Deconfliction, coordination, and concurrence The Secretary of Defense shall deconflict, coordinate, and seek the concurrence of the Secretary of State and the heads of other relevant departments and agencies with respect to activities carried out under the program required by subsection (a), in accordance with the requirements of the authorities provided in chapter 16 (e) Reporting As part of each annual report on Taiwan defensive military capabilities and intelligence support required by section 1248 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 (1) an update on efforts made to address each element under subsection (c); and (2) an identification of any authority or resource shortfall that inhibits such efforts. 1243. Indo-Pacific Maritime Domain Awareness Initiative (a) Establishment Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall seek to establish an initiative with allies and partners of the United States, including Australia, Japan, and India, to be known as the Indo-Pacific Maritime Domain Awareness Initiative Initiative (b) Use of authorities In carrying out the Initiative, the Secretary of Defense may use the authorities provided in chapter 16 (c) Purposes The purposes of the Initiative are as follows: (1) To enhance the ability of allies and partners of the United States in the Indo-Pacific region to fully monitor the maritime domain of such region. (2) To leverage emerging technologies to support maritime domain awareness objectives. (3) To provide a comprehensive understanding of the maritime domain in the Indo-Pacific region, including by facilitating information sharing among such allies and partners. (d) Report Not later than March 1, 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that outlines ongoing and planned activities of the Initiative, and the resources needed to carry out the such activities, for fiscal year 2025. 1244. Extension of Pacific Deterrence Initiative (a) Extension Subsection (c) of section 1251 of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 ( 10 U.S.C. 113 (1) by striking the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (2) by striking fiscal year 2023 fiscal year 2024 (b) Report on resourcing United States defense requirements for the Indo-Pacific region and study on competitive strategies Subsection (d)(1)(A) of such section is amended by striking fiscal years 2023 and 2024 fiscal years 2024 and 2025 1245. Extension of authority to transfer funds for Bien Hoa dioxin cleanup Section 1253(b) of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 ( Public Law 116–283 fiscal year 2023 fiscal year 2024 1246. Extension and modification of pilot program to improve cyber cooperation with foreign military partners in Southeast Asia (a) In general Subsection (a) of section 1256 of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 ( Public Law 116–283 10 U.S.C. 333 (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking in Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia with covered foreign military partners (2) in paragraph (1), by striking Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia covered foreign military partners (3) in paragraph (2), by striking Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia on covered foreign military partners on defensive (b) Elements Subsection (b) of such section is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia covered foreign military partners (2) in paragraph (2), by striking Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia covered foreign military partners (c) Reports Subsection (c)(2)(B) of such title is amended by striking Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia covered foreign military partners (d) Certification Subsection (d) of such section is amended— (1) by inserting with any covered foreign military partner scheduled to commence (2) by striking Vietnam, Indonesia, or Thailand the covered foreign military partner (e) Extension Subsection (e) of such section is amended by striking December 31, 2024 December 31, 2029 (f) Definitions Subsection (f) of such section is amended to read as follows: (f) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate committees of Congress The term appropriate committees of Congress (A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. (2) Covered foreign military partner The term covered foreign military partner (A) Vietnam. (B) Thailand. (C) Indonesia. (D) The Philippines. (E) Malaysia. . (g) Conforming amendments (1) Section 1256 of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 ( Public Law 116–283 10 U.S.C. 333 Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia covered foreign military partners in Southeast Asia (2) The table of contents for the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 ( Public Law 116–283 Sec. 1256. Pilot program to improve cyber cooperation with covered foreign military partners in Southeast Asia. . (3) The table of contents for title XII of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 ( Public Law 116–283 Sec. 1256. Pilot program to improve cyber cooperation with covered foreign military partners in Southeast Asia. . 1247. Extension and modification of certain temporary authorizations (a) In general Section 1244 of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–236 (1) in the section heading, by striking other matters Taiwan (2) in subsection (a)— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) in subparagraph (B), by inserting or the Government of Taiwan the Government of Ukraine (ii) in subparagraph (C), by inserting or the Government of Taiwan the Government of Ukraine (B) in paragraph (5)— (i) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following: (A) the replacement of defense articles from stocks of the Department of Defense provided to— (i) the Government of Ukraine; (ii) foreign countries that have provided support to Ukraine at the request of the United States; (iii) the Government of Taiwan; or (iv) foreign countries that have provided support to Taiwan at the request of the United States; or ; and (ii) in subparagraph (B), by inserting or the Government of Taiwan (C) in paragraph (7), by striking September 30, 2024 September 30, 2028 (D) by redesignating paragraph (7) as paragraph (8); and (E) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following new paragraph (7): (7) Notification Not later than 7 days after the exercise of authority under subsection (a) the Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees of the specific authority exercises, the relevant contract, and the estimated reductions in schedule. . (b) Clerical amendments (1) The table of contents at the beginning of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–236 Sec. 1244. Temporary authorizations related to Ukraine and Taiwan. . (2) The table of contents at the beginning of title XII of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–236 Sec. 1244. Temporary authorizations related to Ukraine and Taiwan. . 1248. Plan for enhanced security cooperation with Japan (a) In general Not later than June 1, 2024, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a plan for enhancing United States security cooperation with Japan. (b) Elements The plan required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A plan for— (A) increased bilateral training, exercises, combined patrols, and other activities between the United States Armed Forces and the Self-Defense Forces of Japan; (B) increasing multilateral military-to-military engagements involving the United States Armed Forces, the Self-Defense Forces of Japan, and the military forces of other regional allies and partners, including Australia, India, the Republic of Korea, and the Philippines, as appropriate; (C) increased sharing of intelligence and other information, including the adoption of enhanced security protocols; (D) current mechanisms, processes, and plans to coordinate and engage with the Joint Headquarters of the Self-Defense Forces of Japan; and (E) enhancing cooperation on advanced technology initiatives, including artificial intelligence, cyber, space, undersea, hypersonic, and related technologies. (2) An analysis of the feasibility and advisability of— (A) increasing combined planning efforts between the United States and Japan to address potential regional contingencies; (B) modifying United States command structures in Japan— (i) to coordinate all United States military activities and operations in Japan; (ii) to complement similar changes by the Self-Defense Forces of Japan; and (iii) to facilitate integrated planning and implementation of combined activities; and (C) additional modifications to the force posture of the United States Armed Forces in Japan, including the establishment of additional main operating locations, cooperative security locations, contingency locations, and other forward operating sites. (3) An identification of challenges to the implementation of the plan required by subsection (a) and any recommended legislative changes, resourcing requirements, bilateral agreements, or other measures that would facilitate the implementation of such plan. (c) Form The plan required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex. (d) Appropriate committees of Congress defined In this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress (1) the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. 1249. Plan for improvements to certain operating locations in Indo-Pacific region (a) Identification of operating locations (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a classified survey to identify each United States operating location within the area of responsibility of the United States Indo-Pacific Command, including in the First, Second, and Third Island Chains, that— (A) may be used to respond militarily to aggression by the People’s Republic of China; and (B) is considered to not be sufficiently capable of mitigating damage to aircraft of the United States Armed Forces in the event of a missile, aerial drone, or other form of attack by the People’s Republic of China. (2) Report Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the survey under paragraph (1). (b) Plan Not later than 60 days after the date on which the report required by paragraph (2) of subsection (a) is submitted, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan— (1) to implement improvements, as appropriate, to operating locations identified under that subsection so as to increase the survivability of aircraft of the United States Armed Forces in the event of a missile, aerial drone, or other form of attack by the People’s Republic of China; and (2) that includes an articulation of other means for increasing survivability of such aircraft in the event of such an attack, including dispersal and deception. (c) Form The report and plan required by this section shall be submitted in classified form. 1250. Strategy for improving posture of ground-based theater-range missiles in Indo-Pacific region (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a strategy for improving the posture of ground-based theater-range missile capabilities in the Indo-Pacific region. (b) Elements The strategy required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An assessment of gaps in conventional ground-based theater-range precision strike capabilities in the area of responsibility of the United States Indo-Pacific Command. (2) An identification of military requirements for conventional ground-based theater-range missile systems, including range, propulsion, payload, launch platform, weapon effects, and other operationally relevant factors in the Indo-Pacific region. (3) An identification of prospective basing locations in the area of responsibility of the United States Indo-Pacific Command, including an articulation of the bilateral agreements necessary to support such deployments. (4) A description of operational concepts for employment, including integration with short-range and multi-domain fires, in denial operations in the Western Pacific. (5) An identification of prospective foreign partners and institutional mechanisms for co-development and co-production of new theater-range conventional missiles. (6) An assessment of the cost and schedule of developmental ground-based theater-range missiles programs, including any potential cost-sharing arrangements with foreign partners through existing institutional mechanisms. (7) The designation of a theater component commander or joint task force commander within the United States Indo-Pacific Command responsible for developing a theater missile strategy. (8) Any other matter the Secretary considers relevant. (c) Form The strategy required by subsection (a) may be submitted in classified form but shall include an unclassified summary. (d) Ground-based theater-range missile defined In this section, the term ground-based theater-range missile 1251. Enhancing major defense partnership with India (a) In general The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the head of any other relevant Federal department or agency, shall seek to ensure that India is appropriately considered for security cooperation benefits consistent with the status of India as a major defense partner of the United States, including with respect to the following lines of effort: (1) Eligibility for funding to initiate or facilitate cooperative research, development, testing, or evaluation projects with the Department of Defense, with priority given to projects in the areas of— (A) artificial intelligence; (B) undersea domain awareness; (C) air combat and support; (D) munitions; and (E) mobility. (2) Eligibility to enter into reciprocal agreements with the Department of Defense for the cooperative provision of training on a bilateral or multilateral basis in support of programs for the purpose of building capacity in the areas of— (A) counterterrorism operations; (B) counter-weapons of mass destruction operations; (C) counter-illicit drug trafficking operations; (D) counter-transnational organized crime operations; (E) maritime and border security operations; (F) military intelligence operations; (G) air domain awareness operations; and (H) cyberspace security and defensive cyberspace operations. (3) Eligibility to enter into a memorandum of understanding or other formal agreement with the Department of Defense for the purpose of conducting cooperative research and development projects on defense equipment and munitions. (4) Eligibility for companies from India to bid on contracts for the maintenance, repair, or overhaul of Department of Defense equipment located outside the United States. (b) Briefing Not later than March 1, 2024, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the head of any other relevant Federal department or agency, shall provide the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives with a briefing on the status of security cooperation activities with India, including the lines of effort specified in subsection (a). 1252. Military cybersecurity cooperation with Taiwan (a) Requirement Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State and in coordination with the Commander of the United States Cyber Command and the Commander of the United States Indo-Pacific Command, shall seek to engage with appropriate officials of Taiwan for the purpose of expanding cooperation on military cybersecurity activities using the authorities under chapter 16 (b) Cooperation efforts In expanding the cooperation of military cybersecurity activities between the Department of Defense and the military forces of Taiwan under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may carry out efforts— (1) to actively defend military networks, infrastructure, and systems; (2) to eradicate malicious cyber activity that has compromised such networks, infrastructure, and systems; (3) to leverage United States commercial and military cybersecurity technology and services to harden and defend such networks, infrastructure, and systems; and (4) to conduct combined cybersecurity training activities and exercises. (c) Briefings (1) Requirement Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall provide to the appropriate committees of Congress a briefing on the implementation of this section. (2) Contents The briefing under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A description of the feasibility and advisability of expanding the cooperation on military cybersecurity activities between the Department of Defense and the military forces of Taiwan. (B) An identification of any challenges and resources that need to be addressed so as to expand such cooperation. (C) An overview of efforts undertaken pursuant to this section. (D) Any other matter the Secretary considers relevant. (d) Appropriate committees of Congress defined In this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress (1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1253. Designation of senior official for Department of Defense activities relating to, and implementation plan for, security partnership among Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States (a) Designation of senior official Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall designate a senior civilian official of the Department of Defense who shall be responsible for overseeing Department of Defense activities relating to the security partnership among Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States (commonly known as the AUKUS partnership (b) Plan (1) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Administrator for Nuclear Security and the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress an implementation plan outlining Department efforts relating to the AUKUS partnership. (2) Elements The plan required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) Timelines and major anticipated milestones for the implementation of the AUKUS partnership. (B) An identification of dependencies of such milestones on defense requirements that are— (i) unrelated to the AUKUS partnership; and (ii) solely within the decisionmaking responsibility of Australia or the United Kingdom. (C) Recommendations for adjustments to statutory and regulatory export authorities or frameworks, including technology transfer and protection, necessary to efficiently implement the AUKUS partnership. (D) A consideration of the implications of the plan on the industrial base with respect to— (i) the expansion of existing United States submarine construction capacity to fulfill United States, United Kingdom, and Australia requirements; (ii) acceleration of the restoration of United States capabilities for producing highly enriched uranium to fuel submarine reactors; (iii) stabilization of commodity markets and expanding supplies of high-grade steel, construction materials, and other resources required for improving shipyard condition and expanding throughput capacity; and (iv) coordination and synchronization of industrial sourcing opportunities among Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. (E) A description of resourcing and personnel requirements, including the hiring of additional foreign disclosure officers. (F) A plan for improving information sharing, including— (i) recommendations for modifications to foreign disclosure policies and processes; (ii) the promulgation of written information-sharing guidelines or policies to improve information sharing under the AUKUS partnership; (iii) the establishment of an information handling caveat specific to the AUKUS partnership; and (iv) the reduction in use of the Not Releasable to Foreign Nations (NOFORN) information handling caveat. (G) Processes for the protection of privately held intellectual property, including patents. (H) A plan to leverage, for the AUKUS partnership, any relevant existing cybersecurity or technology partnership or cooperation activity between the United States and the United Kingdom or between the United States and Australia. (I) Recommended updates to other statutory, regulatory, policy, or process frameworks. (J) Any other matter the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate. (c) Semiannual updates Not later than 60 days after the date on which the plan required by subsection (b) is submitted, and semiannually thereafter on April 1 and October 1 each year through 2029, the senior civilian official designated under subsection (a) shall provide the congressional defense committees with a briefing on the status of all Department activities to implement the AUKUS partnership. (d) Appropriate committees of Congress defined In this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress (1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and (2) the Committees on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. 1254. Report and notification relating to transfer of operational control on Korean Peninsula (a) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that— (1) describes the conditions under which the military forces of the Republic of Korea would be prepared to assume wartime operational control of the United States and Republic of Korea Combined Forces Command; and (2) includes an assessment of the extent to which the military forces of the Republic of Korea meet such conditions as of the date on which the report is submitted. (b) Notification (1) In general Not later than 30 days before the date on which wartime operational control of the United States and Republic of Korea Combined Forces Command is transferred to the Republic of Korea, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall notify the appropriate committees of Congress of such transfer. (2) Elements The notification required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An assessment of the extent to which the military forces of the Republic of Korea meet the conditions described in the report submitted under subsection (a), including with respect to the acquisition by the Republic of Korea of necessary military capabilities to counter the capabilities of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. (B) A description of the command relationship among the United Nations Command, the United States and Republic of Korea Combined Forces Command, the United States Forces Korea, and the military forces of the Republic of Korea. (C) An assessment of the extent to which such transfer impacts the security of the United States, the Republic of Korea, and other regional allies and partners. (c) Appropriate committees of Congress defined In this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress (1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1255. Report on range of consequences of war with the People’s Republic of China (a) In general Not later than December 1, 2024, the Director of the Office of Net Assessment shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the range of geopolitical and economic consequences of a United States-People’s Republic of China conflict in 2030. (b) Elements The report required by subsection (a) shall— (1) account for potential— (A) attacks within the homelands of the United States and the People's Republic of China, including cyber threats and the potential disruption of critical infrastructure; (B) impacts on the United States Armed Forces and the military forces of United States allies and partners, including loss of life, capabilities, United States force posture, and United States alliances in the Indo-Pacific region; (C) impacts on the military forces of the People's Republic of China, including loss of life and capabilities; (D) impacts on the civilian populations of Japan, Taiwan, Australia, and other countries in the Indo-Pacific region; (E) disruption of the global economy; and (F) any other matter the Director of the Office of Net Assessment considers relevant; and (2) include a review of previous attempts in history to forecast the consequences and costs of war. (c) Form The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex. (d) Briefing Not less than 14 days before the date on which the report required by subsection (a) is submitted, the Director of the Office of Net Assessment shall provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees on the conclusions of the report. 1256. Study and report on command structure and force posture of United States Armed Forces in Indo-Pacific region (a) Study (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development center to conduct an independent study for the purpose of improving the current command structure and force posture of the United States Armed Forces in the area of responsibility of the United States Indo-Pacific Command. (2) Report to Secretary (A) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the federally funded research and development center selected to conduct the study required by paragraph (1) shall submit to the Secretary a report on the findings of the study. (B) Elements The report required by subparagraph (A) shall include the following: (i) An assessment of— (I) the current command structure of the United States Armed Forces in the area of responsibility of the United States Indo-Pacific Command; (II) the current force posture, basing, access, and overflight agreements of the United States Armed Forces in such area of responsibility; and (III) any operational or command and control challenge resulting from the geography, current force posture of the United States Armed Forces, or current command structure of the United States Armed Forces in the area of responsibility of the United States Indo-Pacific Command. (ii) Any recommendation for— (I) adjustments to the force posture of the United States Armed Forces in such area of responsibility, including an identification of any additional basing, access, and overflight agreement that may be necessary in response to the changing security environment in such area of responsibility; (II) modifying the current organizational and command structure of the United States Indo-Pacific Command, including United States Forces Japan and United States Forces Korea, in response to such changing security environment; or (III) improving the ability to better coordinate with allies and partners during peacetime and conflict. (b) Report to Congress (1) In general Not later than February 1, 2025, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees an unaltered copy of the report submitted to the Secretary under subsection (a)(2), together with the views of the Secretary on the findings set forth in such report and any corresponding recommendation. (2) Form The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may contain a classified annex. (3) Public availability The Secretary shall make available to the public the unclassified form of the report required by paragraph (1). 1257. Studies on defense budget transparency of the People’s Republic of China and the United States (a) Studies required (1) Defense Intelligence Agency Study Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, shall— (A) complete a study on the defense budget of the People’s Republic of China; (B) submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the results of the study; and (C) make the results of the study available to the public on the internet website of the Department of Defense. (2) Secretary of Defense study Not later than 90 days after the date on which the study required by paragraph (1) is submitted, the Secretary of Defense shall— (A) complete a comparative study on the defense budgets of the People’s Republic of China and the United States; (B) submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the results of the study; and (C) make the results of the study available to the public on the internet website of the Department of Defense. (3) Methodology The studies required by paragraphs (1) and (2) shall each employ a robust methodology that— (A) does not depend on the official pronouncements of the Government of the People’s Republic of China or the Chinese Communist Party; (B) takes into account the military-civil fusion present in the People’s Republic of China; and (C) employs the building-block method of analysis or a similar method of analysis, as appropriate. (4) Objective The objective of the studies required by paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be to provide the people of the United States with an accurate comparison of the defense spending of the People’s Republic of China and the United States. (b) Elements At a minimum, the studies required by this section shall do the following: (1) Determine the amounts invested by each subject country across functional categories for spending, including— (A) defense-related research and development; (B) weapons procurement from domestic and foreign sources; (C) operations and maintenance; (D) pay and benefits; (E) military pensions; and (F) any other category the Secretary considers relevant. (2) Consider the effects of purchasing power parity and market exchange rates, particularly on nontraded goods. (3) Estimate the magnitude of omitted spending from official defense budget information and account for such spending in the comparison. (4) Exclude spending related to veterans’ benefits, other than military pensions provided to veterans. (c) Considerations The studies required by this section may take into consideration the following: (1) The effects of state-owned enterprises on the defense expenditures of the People’s Republic of China. (2) The role of differing acquisition policies and structures with respect to the defense expenditures of each subject country. (3) Any other matter relevant to evaluating the resources dedicated to the defense spending or the various military-related outlays of the People’s Republic of China. (d) Form The studies required by this section shall be submitted in unclassified form, free of handling restrictions, but may include classified annexes. 1258. Briefing on provision of security assistance by the People’s Republic of China and summary of Department of Defense mitigation activities (a) Briefing Not later than March 1, 2024, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall provide to the appropriate committees of Congress a briefing that describes the provision of security assistance and training by the People’s Republic of China to foreign military forces for the purpose of achieving the national objectives of the People's Republic of China. (b) Summary of mitigation activities As part of the first report submitted under section 1206(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 10 U.S.C. 301 (1) strengthen United States alliances and partnerships with foreign military partners; (2) identify countries or governments to which the People’s Republic of China provides such security assistance or military training; (3) dissuade countries and governments from relying on the People’s Republic of China as a partner for such security assistance and military training; (4) identify any manner in which the United States, or close allies of the United States, may engage with countries and governments to be the preferred partner for security assistance and military training; and (5) improve the ability of the United States Armed Forces to coordinate and operate with allies and partners for purposes of mitigating the provision of security assistance and military training by the People’s Republic of China. (c) Appropriate committees of Congress In this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress (1) the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. 1259. Semiannual briefings on bilateral agreements supporting United States military posture in the Indo-Pacific region (a) In general Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 180 days thereafter through fiscal year 2027, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall provide the appropriate committees of Congress with a briefing on bilateral agreements supporting the United States military posture in the Indo-Pacific region. (b) Elements Each briefing required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An update on notable changes to elements described in section 1262(b) of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–236 (2) An assessment of the impact on United States military operations if any individual or combination of allies and partners were to deny continued access, basing, or overflight rights, including with respect to— (A) forward presence; (B) agile basing; (C) pre-positioned materials; or (D) fueling and resupply. (c) Appropriate committees of Congress defined In this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress (1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1260. Semiannual briefings on military of the People's Republic of China (a) In general Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and not less frequently than every 180 days thereafter through March 30, 2027, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on— (1) the military activities of the People’s Republic of China with respect to Taiwan and the South China Sea; (2) efforts by the Department of Defense to engage with the People’s Liberation Army; and (3) United States efforts to enable the defense of Taiwan and bolster maritime security in the South China Sea. (b) Elements Each briefing required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An update on— (A) military developments of the People’s Republic of China relating to any possible Taiwan or South China Sea contingency, including upgrades to the weapon systems of the People’s Republic of China, the procurement of new weapons by the People’s Republic of China, and changes to the posture of the People’s Liberation Army; (B) military equipment acquired by Taiwan pursuant to the Presidential drawdown authority under section 506(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 ( 22 U.S.C. 2318(a) (C) United States efforts to deter aggression by the People's Republic of China in the Indo-Pacific region, including any campaigning or exercise activities conducted by the United States; and (D) United States efforts to train the military forces of Taiwan and allies and partners in Southeast Asia. (2) The most recent information regarding the readiness of or preparations by the People's Liberation Army to potentially conduct aggressive military action against Taiwan. (3) A description of any military activity carried out during the preceding quarter by the People's Republic of China in the vicinity of Taiwan. (4) A description of engagements by Department of Defense officials with the People's Liberation Army, including with respect to maintaining open lines of communication, establishing crisis management capabilities, and deconfliction of military activities. (5) Any other matter the Secretary considers relevant. 1261. Prohibition on use of funds to support entertainment projects with ties to the Government of the People's Republic of China None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be used to knowingly provide active and direct support to any film, television, or other entertainment project if the Secretary of Defense has demonstrable evidence that the project has complied or is likely to comply with a demand from the Government of the People’s Republic of China or the Chinese Communist Party, or an entity under the direction of the People’s Republic of China or the Chinese Communist Party, to censor the content of the project in a material manner to advance the national interest of the People’s Republic of China. 1262. Prohibition on use of funds for the Wuhan Institute of Virology None of the funds authorized to be appropriated under this Act may be made available for the Wuhan Institute of Virology for any purpose. 1263. Audit to identify diversion of Department of Defense funding to China's research labs (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General shall conduct a study, and submit a report to Congress, regarding the amount of Federal funds awarded by the Department of Defense (whether directly or indirectly) through grants, contracts, subgrants, subcontracts, or any other type of agreement or collaboration, during the 10-year period immediately preceding such date of enactment, that— (1) was provided, whether purposely or inadvertently, to— (A) the People’s Republic of China; (B) the Communist Party of China; (C) the Wuhan Institute of Virology or any other organization administered by the Chinese Academy of Sciences; (D) EcoHealth Alliance Inc., including any subsidiaries and related organizations that are directly controlled by EcoHealth Alliance, Inc.; or (E) any other lab, agency, organization, individual, or instrumentality that is owned, controlled (directly or indirectly), or overseen (officially or unofficially) by any of the entities listed in subparagraphs (A) through (D); or (2) was used to fund research or experiments that could have reasonably resulted in the enhancement of any coronavirus, influenza, Nipah, Ebola, or other pathogen of pandemic potential or chimeric versions of such a virus or pathogen in the People’s Republic of China or any other foreign country. (b) Identification of countries and pathogens The report required under subsection (a) shall specify— (1) the countries in which the research or experiments described in subsection (a)(2) was conducted; and (2) the pathogens involved in such research or experiments. 1264. Prohibiting Federal funding for EcoHealth Alliance Inc None of the funds authorized to be appropriated under this Act may be made available for any purpose to— (1) EcoHealth Alliance, Inc.; (2) any subsidiary of EcoHealth Alliance Inc; (3) any organization that is directly controlled by EcoHealth Alliance Inc; or (4) any organization or individual that is a subgrantee or subcontractor of EcoHealth Alliance Inc. 1265. Assessment relating to contingency operational plan of United States Indo-Pacific Command (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall conduct an assessment, based on the contingency operational plan for a major conflict in the area of operations of the United States Indo-Pacific Command, to identify and characterize the dependencies of such plan on specific critical infrastructure facilities, capabilities, and services for the successful mobilization, deployment, and sustainment of forces. (b) Briefings The Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees— (1) before the date on which the Secretary commences the assessment required by subsection (a), a briefing that sets forth the terms of reference and a plan for such assessment; and (2) a briefing on the results of such assessment, not later than the earlier of— (A) the date on which Secretary completes such assessment; or (B) the date that is 180 days after the enactment of this Act. 1266. Assessment of absorptive capacity of military forces of Taiwan (a) Report (1) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the absorptive capacity of the military forces of Taiwan for military capabilities provided and approved by the United States for delivery to Taiwan in the last 10 years, including the date of projected or achieved initial and full operational capabilities. (2) Briefing requirement Not later than 30 days after the delivery of the required report, the Secretary shall provide a briefing on the report to the appropriate committees of Congress. (3) Form The required report shall be provided in classified form with an unclassified cover letter. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) Absorptive capacity The term absorptive capacity (2) Appropriate committees of Congress The term appropriate committees of Congress (A) the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 1267. Analysis of risks and implications of potential sustained military blockade of Taiwan by the People's Republic of China (a) Analysis required (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence, shall complete a comprehensive analysis of the risks and implications of a sustained military blockade of Taiwan by the People’s Republic of China. (2) Elements The analysis required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An assessment of the means by which the People’s Republic of China could execute a sustained military blockade of Taiwan, including the most likely courses of action through which the People's Republic of China could accomplish such a blockade. (B) An identification of indications and warnings of a potential sustained military blockade of Taiwan by the People's Republic of China, and the likely timelines for such indications and warnings. (C) An identification of other coercive actions the People's Republic of China may potentially take before or independently of such a blockade, including the seizure of outlying islands of Taiwan. (D) An assessment of the impact of such a blockade on the ability of Taiwan to sustain its military capabilities, economy, and population. (E) An assessment of threats to, and other potential negative impacts on, the United States homeland during such a blockade scenario. (F) An assessment of key military operational problems presented by such a blockade. (G) An assessment of the concept-required military capabilities necessary to address the problems identified under subparagraph (F). (H) An assessment of challenges to escalation management. (I) An assessment of military or nonmilitary options to counter or retaliate against such a blockade or the seizure of outlying islands of Taiwan, including through horizontal escalation. (J) An assessment of the extent to which such a blockade is addressed by the Joint Warfighting Concept and Joint Concept for Competing. (K) An identification of necessary changes to United States Armed Forces force design, doctrine, and tactics, techniques, and procedures for responding to or mitigating the impact of such a blockade. (L) An assessment of the role of United States partners and allies in addressing the threats and challenges posed by a such a potential blockade. (M) Any other matter the Secretary of Defense considers relevant. (b) Interagency engagement Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall seek to engage with the head of any other appropriate Federal department or agency— (1) regarding the threats and challenges posed by a potential sustained military blockade of Taiwan by the People's Republic of China; and (2) to better understand potential options for a response by the United States Government to such a blockade. (c) Report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a classified report— (1) on the assessment required by paragraph (1) of subsection (a), including all elements described in paragraph (2) of that subsection; and (2) the interagency engagements conducted under subsection (b). (d) Appropriate committees of Congress defined In this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress (1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. 1268. Sense of the Senate on defense alliances and partnerships in the Indo-Pacific region (a) Findings The Senate makes the following findings: (1) The 2022 National Defense Strategy states, [m]utually-beneficial Alliances and partnerships are our greatest global strategic advantage. (2) The United States Indo-Pacific Strategy states, we will prioritize our single greatest asymmetric strength: our network of security alliances and partnerships. Across the region, the United States will work with allies and partners to deepen our interoperability and develop and deploy advanced warfighting capabilities as we support them in defending their citizens and their sovereign interests. (3) Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin testified on March 28, 2023, that our allies and partners are a huge force multiplier. They magnify our power, advance our shared security interests, and help uphold a world that is free, open, prosperous, and secure. (4) Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Milley testified on March 28, 2023, that our alliances and partnerships are key to maintaining the rules-based international order and a stable and open international system promoting peace and prosperity…We are stronger when we operate closely with our allies and partners. (5) Commander of the United States Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Aquilino testified on April 20, 2023, that a robust network of allies and partners, built on the strength of our shared interests, is our greatest advantage. United States Indo-Pacific Command is strengthening all layers of our security network: allies, multilateral arrangements, partners, friends, and the Five Eyes nations. We execute security cooperation activities, training, and exercises to strengthen those relationships, build partner capacity, and enhance interoperability. (b) Sense of the Senate It is the sense of the Senate that the Secretary of Defense should continue efforts that strengthen United States defense alliances and partnerships in the Indo-Pacific region so as to further the comparative advantage of the United States in strategic competition with the People's Republic of China, including by— (1) enhancing cooperation with Japan, consistent with the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security Between the United States of America and Japan, signed at Washington, January 19, 1960, including by developing advanced military capabilities, fostering interoperability across all domains, and improving sharing of information and intelligence; (2) reinforcing the United States alliance with the Republic of Korea, including by maintaining the presence of approximately 28,500 members of the United States Armed Forces deployed to the country and affirming the United States commitment to extended deterrence using the full range of United States defense capabilities, consistent with the Mutual Defense Treaty Between the United States and the Republic of Korea, signed at Washington, October 1, 1953, in support of the shared objective of a peaceful and stable Korean Peninsula; (3) fostering bilateral and multilateral cooperation with Australia, consistent with the Security Treaty Between Australia, New Zealand, and the United States of America, signed at San Francisco, September 1, 1951, and through the partnership among Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States (commonly known as AUKUS (A) to advance shared security objectives; (B) to accelerate the fielding of advanced military capabilities; and (C) to build the capacity of emerging partners; (4) advancing United States alliances with the Philippines and Thailand and United States partnerships with other partners in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations to enhance maritime domain awareness, promote sovereignty and territorial integrity, leverage technology and promote innovation, and support an open, inclusive, and rules-based regional architecture; (5) broadening United States engagement with India, including through the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue— (A) to advance the shared objective of a free and open Indo-Pacific region through bilateral and multilateral engagements and participation in military exercises, expanded defense trade, and collaboration on humanitarian aid and disaster response; and (B) to enable greater cooperation on maritime security; (6) strengthening the United States partnership with Taiwan, consistent with the Three Communiques, the Taiwan Relations Act ( Public Law 96–8 22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq. (7) reinforcing the status of the Republic of Singapore as a Major Security Cooperation Partner of the United States and continuing to strengthen defense and security cooperation between the military forces of the Republic of Singapore and the Armed Forces of the United States, including through participation in combined exercises and training; (8) engaging with the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Republic of Palau, and other Pacific Island countries with the goal of strengthening regional security and addressing issues of mutual concern, including protecting fisheries from illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing; (9) collaborating with Canada, the United Kingdom, France, and other members of the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to build connectivity and advance a shared vision for the region that is principled, long-term, and anchored in democratic resilience; and (10) investing in enhanced military posture and capabilities in the area of responsibility of the United States Indo-Pacific Command and strengthening cooperation in bilateral relationships, multilateral partnerships, and other international fora to uphold global security and shared principles, with the goal of ensuring the maintenance of a free and open Indo-Pacific region. E Securing maritime data from China 1271. Short title This subtitle may be cited as the Securing Maritime Data from China Act of 2023 1272. LOGINK defined In this subtitle, the term LOGINK 1273. Countering the spread of LOGINK (a) Contracting prohibition The Department of Defense may not enter into or renew any contract with any entity that uses— (1) LOGINK; (2) any logistics platform controlled by, affiliated with, or subject to the jurisdiction of the Chinese Communist Party or the Government of the People’s Republic of China; or (3) any logistics platform that shares data with a system described in paragraph (1) or (2). (b) Applicability Subsection (a) applies with respect to any contract entered into or renewed on or after the date that is 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. F Reports 1281. Report on Department of Defense roles and responsibilities in support of National Strategy for the Arctic Region Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on Department of Defense roles and responsibilities in support of the National Strategy for the Arctic Region that includes— (1) an identification of the Department's lines of effort to support the implementation of the National Strategy for the Arctic Region, including the implementation plan for each applicable military department; (2) a plan for the execution of, and a projected timeline and the resource requirements for, each such line of effort; and (3) any other matter the Secretary considers relevant. G Other matters 1291. Military intelligence collection and analysis partnerships (a) Use of funds other than appropriated funds (1) In general Subject to paragraph (2), the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, may accept and expend foreign partner funds in order for the foreign partner or partners to share with the Defense Intelligence Agency the expenses of joint and combined military intelligence collection and analysis activities. (2) Limitations (A) Previously denied funds Funds accepted under this section may not be expended, in whole or in part, by or for the benefit of the Defense Intelligence Agency for any purpose for which Congress has previously denied funds. (B) Joint benefit The authority provided by paragraph (1) may not be used to acquire items or services for the sole benefit of the United States. (b) Annual Report Not later than March 1, 2025, and annually thereafter for four years, the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on any funds accepted or expended under this section during the preceding calendar year, including an identification of the foreign partner or partners involved and a description of the purpose of such funds. (c) Termination The authority to accept and expend foreign partner funds pursuant to this section shall terminate on December 31, 2028. (d) Appropriate committees of Congress defined In this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress (1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 1292. Collaboration with partner countries to develop and maintain military-wide transformational strategies for operational energy (a) Establishment (1) In general Not later than January 1, 2025, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a partnership program using existing authorities to collaborate with the military forces of partner countries in developing and maintaining military-wide transformational strategies for operational energy (in this section referred to as the Program (2) Organization The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy and in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, the commanders of the combatant commands, and any other individual the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate, shall be responsible for, and shall oversee, the Program. (b) Objective The objective of the Program is to promote the readiness of the United States Armed Forces and the military forces of partner countries for missions in contested logistics environments by focusing on demand reduction and employing more diverse and renewable operational energy sources so as to enhance energy security, energy resilience, and energy conservation, reduce logistical vulnerabilities, and ensure that supply lines are resilient to extreme weather, disruptions to energy supplies, and direct or indirect cyber attacks. (c) Activities (1) In general Under the Program, the United States Armed Forces and the military forces of each participating partner country shall, in coordination— (A) establish policies to improve warfighting capability through energy security and energy resilience; (B) integrate efforts to mitigate mutual contested logistics challenges through the reduction of operational energy demand; (C) identify and mitigate operational energy challenges presented by any contested logistics environment, including through developing innovative delivery systems, distributed storage, flexible contracting, and improved automation; (D) assess and integrate, to the extent practicable, any technology, including electric, hydrogen, nuclear, biofuels, and any other sustainable fuel technology or renewable energy technology, that may reduce operational energy demand in the near term or long term; (E) assess and consider any infrastructure investment of allied and partner countries that may affect operational energy availability in the event of a conflict with a near-peer adversary; and (F) assess and integrate, to the extent practicable— (i) any technology that increases sustainability; and (ii) any practice, technology, or strategy that reduces negative impacts on human health. (2) Country considerations In carrying out any activity under paragraph (1), to the extent practicable, the relevant existing and past military conflicts and cultural practices of, and beliefs prevalent in, the participating country shall be taken into account. (d) Strategy (1) In general Not later than September 30, 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a strategy for the implementation of the Program. (2) Elements The strategy required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A governance structure for the Program, including— (i) the officials tasked to oversee the Program; (ii) the format of the governing body of the Program; (iii) the functions and duties of such governing body with respect to establishing and maintaining the Program; and (iv) mechanisms for coordinating with partner countries selected to participate in the Program. (B) With respect to the selection of partner countries initially selected to participate in the Program— (i) an identification of each such country; (ii) the rationale for selecting each such country, including a description of— (I) the benefits to the military forces of the partner country; and (II) the benefits to the United States Armed Forces of participation by such country; (iii) a description of any limitation on the participation of a selected partner country; and (iv) any other information the Secretary considers appropriate. (C) A list of additional authorities, appropriations, or other congressional support necessary to ensure the success of the Program. (D) A campaign of objectives for the first three fiscal years of the Program, including— (i) a description of, and a rationale for selecting, such objectives; (ii) an identification of milestones toward achieving such objectives; and (iii) metrics for evaluating success in achieving such objectives. (E) A description of opportunities and potential timelines for future Program expansion, as appropriate. (F) Any other information the Secretary considers appropriate. (3) Form The strategy required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex. (e) Report (1) In general Not later than September 20, 2025, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the Program. (2) Elements Each report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A narrative summary of activities conducted as part of the Program during the preceding fiscal year. (B) Except in the case of the initial report, an assessment of progress toward the objectives established for the preceding fiscal year described in the preceding report under this subsection using the metrics established in such report. (C) A campaign of objectives for the three fiscal years following the date of submission of the report, including— (i) a description of, and a rationale for selecting, such objectives; (ii) an identification of milestones toward achieving such objectives; and (iii) metrics for evaluating success in achieving such objectives. (D) A description of opportunities and potential timelines for future Program expansion, as appropriate. (E) Any other information the Secretary considers appropriate. (3) Form Each report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex. (f) Termination The Program shall terminate on December 31, 2029. (g) Contested logistics environment defined In this section, the term contested logistics environment 1293. Modification of support of special operations for irregular warfare (a) In general Chapter 3 section 127c 127d. Support of special operations for irregular warfare (a) Authority The Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of the relevant Chief of Mission, expend up to $20,000,000 during any fiscal year to provide support to foreign forces, irregular forces, groups, or individuals engaged in supporting or facilitating ongoing and authorized irregular warfare operations by United States Special Operations Forces. (b) Funds Funds for support under this section in a fiscal year shall be derived from amounts authorized to be appropriated for that fiscal year for the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance. (c) Procedures (1) In general The authority in this section shall be exercised in accordance with such procedures as the Secretary shall establish for purposes of this section. (2) Elements The procedures required under paragraph (1) shall establish, at a minimum, the following: (A) Policy guidance for the execution of, and constraints within, activities under the authority in this section. (B) The processes through which activities under the authority in this section are to be developed, validated, and coordinated, as appropriate, with relevant entities of the United States Government. (C) The processes through which legal reviews and determinations are made to comply with the authority in this section and ensure that the exercise of such authority is consistent with the national security of the United States. (D) The processes to ensure, to the extent practicable, that before a decision to provide support is made, the recipients of support do not pose a counterintelligence or force protection threat and have not engaged in gross violations of human rights. (E) The processes by which the Department shall keep the congressional defense committees fully and currently informed of— (i) the requirements for the use of the authority in this section; and (ii) activities conducted under such authority. (3) Notice to Congress on procedures and material modifications The Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees of the procedures established pursuant to this section before any exercise of the authority in this section, and shall notify such committee of any material modification of the procedures. (d) Construction of authority Nothing in this section shall be construed to constitute a specific statutory authorization for any of the following: (1) The conduct of a covert action, as such term is defined in section 503(e) of the National Security Act of 1947 ( 50 U.S.C. 3093(e) (2) The introduction of United States Armed Forces (including as such term is defined in section 8(c) of the War Powers Resolution ( 50 U.S.C. 1547(c) (3) The provision of support to regular forces, irregular forces, groups, or individuals for the conduct of operations that United States Special Operations Forces are not otherwise legally authorized to conduct themselves. (4) The conduct or support of activities, directly or indirectly, that are inconsistent with the laws of armed conflict. (e) Limitation on delegation The authority of the Secretary to make funds available under this section for support of a military operation may not be delegated. (f) Programmatic and policy oversight The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict shall have primary programmatic and policy oversight within the Office of the Secretary of Defense of support to irregular warfare activities authorized by this section. (g) Notification (1) In general Not later than 15 days before exercising the authority in this section to make funds available to initiate support of an ongoing and authorized operation or changing the scope or funding level of any support under this section for such an operation by $500,000 or an amount equal to 10 percent of such funding level (whichever is less), the Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees of the use of such authority with respect to such operation. Any such notification shall be in writing. (2) Elements A notification required by this subsection shall include the following: (A) The type of support to be provided to United States Special Operations Forces, and a description of the ongoing and authorized operation to be supported. (B) A description of the foreign forces, irregular forces, groups, or individuals engaged in supporting or facilitating the ongoing and authorized operation that is to be the recipient of funds. (C) The type of support to be provided to the recipient of the funds, and a description of the end-use monitoring to be used in connection with the use of the funds. (D) The amount obligated under the authority to provide support. (E) The duration for which the support is expected to be provided, and an identification of the timeframe in which the provision of support will be reviewed by the commander of the applicable combatant command for a determination with respect to the necessity of continuing such support. (F) The determination of the Secretary that the provision of support does not constitute any of the following: (i) An introduction of United States Armed Forces (including as such term is defined in section 8(c) of the War Powers Resolution ( 50 U.S.C. 1547(c) 50 U.S.C. 1544(b) (ii) A covert action, as such term is defined in section 503(e) of the National Security Act of 1947 ( 50 U.S.C. 3093(e) (iii) An authorization for the provision of support to regular forces, irregular forces, groups, or individuals for the conduct of operations that United States Special Operations Forces are not otherwise legally authorized to conduct themselves. (iv) The conduct or support of activities, directly or indirectly, that are inconsistent with the laws of armed conflict. (h) Notification of suspension or termination of support (1) In general Not later than 48 hours after suspending or terminating support to any foreign force, irregular force, group, or individual provided pursuant to the authority in this section, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a written notice of such suspension or termination. (2) Elements The written notice required by paragraph (1) shall include each of the following: (A) A description of the reasons for the suspension or termination of such support. (B) A description of any effect on regional, theater, or global campaign plan objectives anticipated to result from such suspension or termination. (C) A plan for such suspension or termination, and, in the case of support that is planned to be transitioned to any other program of the Department of Defense or to a program of any other Federal department or agency, a detailed description of the transition plan, including the resources, equipment, capabilities, and personnel associated with such plan. (i) Biannual reports (1) Report on preceding fiscal year Not later than 120 days after the close of each fiscal year in which subsection (a) is in effect, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the support provided under this section during the preceding fiscal year. (2) Report on current calendar year Not later than 180 days after the submittal of each report required by paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the support provided under this section during the first half of the fiscal year in which the report under this paragraph is submitted. (3) Elements Each report required by this subsection shall include the following: (A) A summary of the ongoing irregular warfare operations, and associated authorized campaign plans, being conducted by United States Special Operations Forces that were supported or facilitated by foreign forces, irregular forces, groups, or individuals for which support was provided under this section during the period covered by such report. (B) A description of the support or facilitation provided by such foreign forces, irregular forces, groups, or individuals to United States Special Operations Forces during such period. (C) The type of recipients that were provided support under this section during such period, identified by authorized category (foreign forces, irregular forces, groups, or individuals). (D) A detailed description of the support provided to the recipients under this section during such period. (E) The total amount obligated for support under this section during such period, including budget details. (F) The intended duration of support provided under this section during such period. (G) An assessment of value of the support provided under this section during such period, including a summary of significant activities undertaken by foreign forces, irregular forces, groups, or individuals to support irregular warfare operations by United States Special Operations Forces. (H) The total amount obligated for support under this section in prior fiscal years. (j) Quarterly briefings (1) In general Not less frequently than quarterly, the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the use of the authority provided by this section, and other matters relating to irregular warfare, with the primary purposes of— (A) keeping the congressional defense committees fully and currently informed of irregular warfare requirements and activities, including emerging combatant commands requirements; and (B) consulting with the congressional defense committees regarding such matters. (2) Elements Each briefing required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An update on irregular warfare activities within each geographic combatant command and a description of the manner in which such activities support the respective theater campaign plan and the National Defense Strategy. (B) An overview of relevant authorities and legal issues, including limitations. (C) An overview of irregular warfare-related interagency activities and initiatives. (D) A description of emerging combatant command requirements for the use of the authority provided by this section. (k) Irregular warfare defined Subject to subsection (f), in this section, the term irregular warfare . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 127c the following new item: 127d. Support of special operations for irregular warfare. . (c) Repeal Section 1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 is repealed. 1294. Modification of authority for expenditure of funds for clandestine activities that support operational preparation of the environment Section 127f of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f) as subsections (d), (e), (g), and (h), respectively; (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c): (c) Procedures (1) In general The authority in this section shall be exercised in accordance with such procedures as the Secretary shall establish for purposes of this section. (2) Elements The procedures required under paragraph (1) shall establish, at a minimum, each of the following: (A) Policy, strategy, or other guidance for the execution of, and constraints within, activities conducted under this section. (B) The processes through which activities conducted under this section are to be developed, validated, and coordinated, as appropriate, with relevant entities of the United States Government. (C) The processes through which legal reviews and determinations are made to comply with the authority in this section and ensure that the exercise of such authority is consistent with the national security interests of the United States. (D) The processes by which the Department of Defense shall keep the congressional defense committees fully and currently informed of— (i) the requirements for the use of the authority in this section; and (ii) activities conducted under such authority. (3) Notice to Congress The Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees of any material modification to the procedures established under paragraph (1). ; (3) by inserting after subsection (e), as redesignated, the following new subsection (f): (f) Notification Not later than 15 days before exercising the authority in this section to make funds available to initiate a new operational preparation of the environment activity or changing the scope or funding level of any support for such an operation by $1,000,000 or an amount equal to 20 percent of such funding level (whichever is less), or not later than 48 hours after exercising such authority if the Secretary determines that extraordinary circumstances that impact the national security of the United States exist, the Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees of the use of such authority with respect to that activity. Any such notification shall be in writing. ; and (4) by adding at the end the following new subsections: (i) Oversight by Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict shall have primary responsibility within the Office of the Secretary of Defense for oversight of policies and programs authorized by this section. (j) Construction of authority Nothing in this section may be construed to constitute authority to conduct, or provide statutory authorization for, any of the following: (1) Execution of operational activities. (2) A covert action, as such term is defined in section 503(e) of the National Security Act of 1947 ( 50 U.S.C. 3093(e) (3) An introduction of the armed forces, (including the introduction of United States Armed Forces as such term is defined in section 8(c) of the War Powers Resolution ( 50 U.S.C. 1547(c) 50 U.S.C. 1544(b) (4) Activities or support for activities, directly or indirectly, that are inconsistent with the laws of armed conflict. (k) Operational preparation of the environment defined In this section, the term operational preparation of the environment . 1295. Modification of initiative to support protection of national security academic researchers from undue influence and other security threats Section 1286 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( 10 U.S.C. 4001 (1) in subsection (c)— (A) by redesignating paragraphs (7) through (9) as paragraphs (8) through (10), respectively; (B) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following new paragraph (7): (7) Policies to limit or prohibit funding provided by the Department of Defense for institutions or individual researchers who knowingly contract or make other financial arrangements with entities identified in the list described in paragraph (9), which policies shall include— (A) use of such list as part of a risk assessment decision matrix during proposal evaluations, including the development of a question for proposers or broad area announcements that require proposers to disclose any contractual or financial connections with such entities; (B) a requirement that the Department shall notify a proposer of suspected noncompliance with a policy issued under this paragraph and provide not less than 30 days to take actions to remedy such noncompliance; (C) the establishment of an appeals procedure under which a proposer may appeal a negative decision on a proposal if the decision is based on a determination informed by such list; and (D) a requirement that each awardee of funding provided by the Department shall disclose to the Department any contract or financial arrangement made with such an entity during the period of the award. ; and (C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (11) Development of measures of effectiveness and performance to assess and track progress of the Department of Defense across the initiative, which measures shall include— (A) the evaluation of currently available data to support the assessment of such measures, including the identification of areas in which gaps exist that may require collection of completely new data, or modifications to existing data sets; (B) current means and methods for the collection of data in an automated manner, including the identification of areas in which gaps exist that may require new means for data collection or visualization of such data; and (C) the development of an analysis and assessment methodology framework to make tradeoffs between the measures developed under this paragraph and other metrics related to assessing undue foreign influence on the Department of Defense research enterprise, such as commercial due diligence, beneficial ownership, and foreign ownership, control, and influence. ; and (2) in subsection (e)(2), by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (G) A description of the status of the measures of effectiveness and performance described in subsection (c)(11) for the period covered by such report, including an analytical assessment of the impact of such measures on the goals of the initiative. . 1296. Modification of authority for certain payments to redress injury and loss Section 1213(h) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( 10 U.S.C. 2731 (1) in paragraph (1), by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (D) as clauses (i) through (iv), and moving such clauses, as redesignated, two ems to the right; (2) by redesignating paragraph (1) as subparagraph (A) and moving such subparagraph, as redesignated, two ems to the right; (3) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows: (B) A description of any denied or refused ex gratia payment or request, including— (i) the date on which any such request was made; (ii) the steps the Department of Defense has taken to respond to the request; (iii) in the case of a refused payment, the reason for such refusal, if known; and (iv) any other reason for which a payment was not offered or made. ; (4) by redesignating paragraph (3) as subparagraph (C) and moving such subparagraph, as redesignated, two ems to the right; (5) by striking Not later than (1) In general Not later than ; and (6) by adding at the end the following new paragraph (2): (2) Public availability (A) In general Not later than 15 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits each report required by paragraph (1), the Secretary shall make the report available to the public in an electronic format. (B) Privacy The Secretary of Defense shall exclude from each report made available to the public under subparagraph (A)— (i) confidential or personally identifiable information pertaining to specific payment recipients so as to ensure the safety and privacy of such recipients; and (ii) any confidential or classified information that would undermine Department of Defense operational security. . 1297. Modification of authority for cooperation on directed energy capabilities (a) Program authorization Section 1280 of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 ( Public Law 116–283 22 U.S.C. 8606 (1) in subsection (d), in the first sentence— (A) by inserting acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, the Secretary of Defense, (B) by striking may establish a program is authorized (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (e) Notification (1) In general Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress an assessment detailing— (A) the most promising directed energy missile defense technologies available for co-development with the Government of Israel; (B) any risks relating to the implementation of a directed energy missile defense technology co-development program with the Government of Israel; (C) an anticipated spending plan for fiscal year 2024 funding authorized by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 to carry out this section; and (D) initial projections for likely funding requirements to carry out a directed energy missile defense technology co-development program with the Government of Israel over the five fiscal years beginning after the date of the enactment of that Act, as applicable. (2) Appropriate committees of Congress defined In this subsection, the term appropriate committees of Congress (A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. . (b) Additional funding The amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2024 by section 4201 for research, development, test, and evaluation for Advanced Component Development and Prototypes is hereby increased by $25,000,000, with the amount of the increase to be available for Israeli Cooperative Programs (PE 0603913C). (c) Offset The amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2024 by section 4201 for research, development, test, and evaluation for the Air Force is hereby decreased by $25,000,000, with the amount of the decrease to be taken from the amounts available for VC–25B (PE 0401319F). 1298. Modification of Arctic Security Initiative Section 1090(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking the Secretary may the Secretary shall (2) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking If the Initiative is established On the establishment of the Initiative 1299. Termination of authorization of non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities Section 943(g) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( Public Law 110–417 (g) Termination The authority under this section shall terminate on December 31, 2023. . 1299A. Extension of prohibition on in-flight refueling to non-United States aircraft that engage in hostilities in the ongoing civil war in Yemen Section 1273 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 1273. Prohibition on in-flight refueling to non-United States aircraft that engage in hostilities in the ongoing civil war in Yemen For the one-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, the Department of Defense may not provide in-flight refueling pursuant to section 2342 of title 10, United States Code, or any other applicable statutory authority, to non-United States aircraft that engage in hostilities in the ongoing civil war in Yemen unless and until a declaration of war or a specific statutory authorization for such use of the United States Armed Forces has been enacted. . 1299B. Extension of United States-Israel anti-tunnel cooperation Section 1279(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( 22 U.S.C. 8606 December 31, 2024 December 31, 2026 1299C. Prohibition on delegation of authority to designate foreign partner forces as eligible for the provision of collective self-defense support by United States Armed Forces (a) In general The authority to designate foreign partner forces as eligible for the provision of collective self-defense support by the United States Armed Forces may not be delegated below the Secretary of Defense. (b) Review Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall review existing designations of foreign partner forces as eligible for the provision of collective self-defense support by the United States Armed Forces and provide the congressional defense committees with a certification with respect to whether each such designation remains valid. (c) Waiver (1) In general The Secretary may waive the prohibition under subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that there are compelling circumstances that necessitate the waiver of such prohibition. (2) Notice Not later than 48 hours after the Secretary exercises the waiver authority under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notice of the waiver, which shall include— (A) a description of the compelling circumstances that necessitated the wavier; (B) a description of the United States national security interests served by the waiver; (C) an identification of any named operation related to the waiver; and (D) an articulation of any temporal, geographic, or other limitations on the waiver. (d) Rule of construction Nothing in this section shall be construed as invalidating a designation of foreign partner forces as eligible for the provision of collective self-defense support by the United States Armed Forces that is in effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act. (e) Collective self-defense defined In this section, the term collective self-defense 1299D. Participation by military departments in interoperability programs with military forces of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom (a) In general Section 1274 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 ( 10 U.S.C. 2350a (1) in the section heading, by striking Administration of the American, British, Canadian, and Australian Armies' Program Participation by military departments in interoperability programs with military forces of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom (2) in subsection (a)— (A) by inserting a military department of the participation by (B) by striking the land-force program known as the American, British, Canadian, and Australian Armies’ Program an interoperability program with the military forces of one or more participating countries specified in subsection (b) (b) Clerical amendments (1) The table of contents of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 ( Public Law 112–239 Sec. 1274. Participation by military departments in interoperability programs with military forces of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. . (2) The table of contents for title XII of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 ( Public Law 112–239 Sec. 1274. Participation by military departments in interoperability programs with military forces of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. . 1299E. Cooperation with allies and partners in Middle East on development of integrated regional cybersecurity architecture (a) Cooperation (1) In general The Secretary of Defense, using existing authorities and in consultation with the head of any other Federal agency, as appropriate, shall seek to cooperate with allies and partners in the Middle East with respect to developing an integrated regional cybersecurity architecture and deepening military cybersecurity partnerships to defend military networks, infrastructure, and systems against hostile cyber activity. (2) Protection of sensitive information Any activity carried out under paragraph (1)shall be conducted in a manner that— (A) is consistent with the protection of intelligence sources and methods; and (B) appropriately protects sensitive information and the national security interests of the United States. (b) Strategy (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a strategy for cooperation with allies and partners in the Middle East to develop an integrated regional cybersecurity architecture to defend military networks, infrastructure, and systems against hostile cyber activity. (2) Elements The strategy submitted under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An assessment of the threat landscape of cyberattacks, military networks, infrastructure, and systems against allies and partners within the Middle East. (B) A description of current efforts to share, between the United States and allies and partners within the Middle East, indicators and warnings, tactics, techniques, procedures, threat signatures, planning efforts, training, and other similar information about cyber threats. (C) An analysis of current bilateral and multilateral defense protocols protecting military networks, infrastructure, and systems and sharing sensitive cyber threat information between the United States and allies and partners in the Middle East. (D) An assessment of whether a multinational integrated military cybersecurity partnership, including establishing a center in the Middle East to facilitate such activities, would improve collective security in the Middle East. (E) An assessment of gaps in ally and partner capabilities that would have to be remedied in order to establish such a center. (F) A description of any prior or ongoing effort to engage allies and partners in the Middle East in establishing— (i) a multinational integrated cybersecurity partnership or other bilateral or multilateral defensive cybersecurity information sharing and training partnership; or (ii) other cooperative defensive cybersecurity measures. (G) An identification of elements of a potential multinational military cybersecurity partnership, or other bilateral or multilateral defensive cybersecurity measures, that— (i) can be acquired and operated by specified foreign partners within the area of responsibility of the United States Central Command; (ii) can only be provided and operated by the United States; and (iii) can be provided by a third party entity contracted by the United States Central Command jointly with specified foreign partners. (H) Any other matter the Secretary of Defense considers relevant. (3) Form The strategy required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex. (c) Appropriate committees of Congress defined In this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress (1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 1299F. Foreign Advance Acquisition Account (a) Establishment The Secretary of Defense may establish, within the Special Defense Acquisition Fund established pursuant to chapter 5 of the Arms Export Control Act ( 22 U.S.C. 2795 et seq. Foreign Advance Acquisition Account Account (b) Use of funds Amounts in the Account shall be made available to the Secretary of Defense for the following purposes: (1) To finance the acquisition, using the procedures of the Special Defense Acquisition Fund, of defense articles and services in advance of the transfer of such articles and services to covered countries through the foreign military sales process. (2) To provide a mechanism for covered countries to contribute funds, including before the completion of a letter of offer under the procedures of the Arms Export Control Act ( 22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq. (3) To pay for storage, maintenance, and other costs related to the storage, preservation, and preparation for transfer of defense articles and services acquired using amounts in the Account prior to their transfer, and to pay for the administrative costs of the Department of Defense incurred in the acquisition of such items to the extent not reimbursed pursuant to section 43(b) of the Arms Export Control Act ( 22 U.S.C. 2792(b) (c) Contributions from covered countries The Secretary of Defense may accept contributions of amounts to the Account from any foreign person, entity, or government of a covered country. (d) Limitations (1) Applicability of other law Defense articles and services acquired by the Secretary of Defense using amounts in the Account may not be transferred to any foreign country unless such transfer is authorized by the Arms Export Control Act ( 22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq. 22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq. (2) Previously denied funds Amounts in the Account may not be expended, in whole or in part, by or for the benefit of the Department of Defense for a purpose for which Congress has previously denied funds. (3) Additional limitation Amounts in the Account may not be used to acquire items or services for the sole benefit of the United States. (e) Annual report Not later than 60 days after the date on which each fiscal year ends, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the use of the Account that includes, for such fiscal year— (1) an identification of each covered country that contributed to the Account; (2) the amount deposited into the Account by each such covered country; and (3) for each such covered country, the designated defense articles or services acquired or to be acquired. (f) Quarterly report Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and quarterly thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the use of the Account that includes, for each transaction— (1) a description of the transaction; (2) the amount of the transaction; (3) the covered country concerned; (4) an identification of any storage, maintenance, or other costs associated with the transaction; and (5) the anticipated date of delivery of the applicable defense articles or services. (g) Termination The authority under subsection (b) to use funds in the Account shall terminate on January 1, 2028. (h) Rule of construction Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or impair the responsibilities conferred on the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Defense under the Arms Export Control Act ( 22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq. 22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq. (i) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate committees of Congress The term appropriate committees of Congress (A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. (2) Covered country The term covered country (A) a country, other than the United States, that is a participant in the security partnership among Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States (commonly known as the AUKUS (B) a member country of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization; and (C) any other country, as designated by the Secretary of Defense. 1299G. Limitation on availability of funds for travel expenses of the Office of the Secretary of Defense Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2024 for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide, and available for the Office of the Secretary of Defense for travel expenses, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of Defense submits— (1) the implementation plan required by section 1087 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 10 U.S.C. 161 (2) the plan required by section 1332(g)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 (3) the strategy and posture review required by section 1631(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 ( Public Law 116–92 10 U.S.C. 397 1299H. Plans related to rapid transfer of certain missiles and defense capabilities (a) In general The Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition shall— (1) develop a plan to prepare Navy Harpoon block IC missiles in a sundown deep stow demilitarized (2) establish a plan that would enable the rapid transfer of additional enhanced coastal defense capabilities that have tactical significance in assisting partners and allies in reclaiming sovereign territory, deterring maritime resupply of illegally seized territory, or aiding in preventing an amphibious invasion of sovereign territory. (b) Submission to Congress Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Assistant Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the plans required by paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a). 1299I. Ensuring peace through strength in Israel (a) Extension of authorities (1) War reserves stockpile authority Section 12001(d) of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2005 ( Public Law 108–287 September 30, 2025 January 1, 2028 (2) Rules governing the transfer of precision-guided munitions to Israel above the annual restriction Section 1275(e) of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 ( Public Law 116–283 22 U.S.C. 2321h on the date that is three years after the date of the enactment of this Act on January 1, 2028 (b) Department of Defense assessment of type and quantity of precision-guided munitions and other munitions for use by Israel (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter through December 31, 2028, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct an assessment with respect to the following: (A) The current quantity and type of precision-guided munitions in the stockpile pursuant to section 12001(d) of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2005 ( Public Law 108–287 (B) The quantity and type of precision-guided munitions necessary for Israel to protect its homeland and counter Hezbollah, Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, or any other armed terror group or hostile forces in the region in the event of a sustained armed confrontation. (C) The quantity and type of other munitions necessary for Israel to protect its homeland and counter Hezbollah, Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, or any other armed group or hostile forces in the region in the event of a sustained armed confrontation. (D) The quantity and type of munitions, including precision-guided munitions, necessary for Israel to protect its homeland and counter any combination of Hezbollah, Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and any other armed terror groups or hostile forces in the region in the event of a multi-front, sustained armed confrontation. (E) The resources the Government of Israel would need to dedicate to acquire the quantity and type of munitions, including precision-guided munitions, described in subparagraphs (B) through (D). (F) Whether, as of the date on which the applicable assessment is completed, sufficient quantities and types of munitions, including precision-guided munitions, to conduct operations described in subparagraphs (B) through (D) are present in— (i) the inventory of the military forces of Israel; (ii) the War Reserves Stock Allies-Israel; (iii) any other United States stockpile or depot within the area of responsibility of United States Central Command, as the Secretary considers appropriate to disclose to the Government of Israel; or (iv) the inventory of the United States Armed Forces, as the Secretary considers appropriate to disclose to the Government of Israel. (G) The current inventory of such munitions, including precision-guided munitions, possessed by the United States, and whether, as of the date on which the applicable assessment is completed, the United States is assessed to have sufficient munitions to meet the requirements of current operation plans of the United States or global other munitions requirements. (H) United States planning and steps being taken— (i) to assist Israel to prepare for the contingencies, and to conduct the operations, described in subparagraphs (B) through (D); and (ii) to resupply Israel with the quantity and type of such munitions described in such subparagraphs in the event of a sustained armed confrontation described in such subparagraphs. (I) The quantity and pace at which the United States is capable of pre-positioning, increasing, stockpiling, or rapidly replenishing, or assisting in the rapid replenishment of, such munitions in preparation for, and in the event of, such a sustained armed confrontation. (2) Consultation In carrying out the assessment required by paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consult with the Israeli Ministry of Defense, provided that the Israeli Ministry of Defense agrees to be so consulted. (c) Reports (1) Department of Defense assessment Not later than 15 days after the date on which each Department of Defense assessment required by subsection (b) is completed, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on such assessment. (2) Pre-positioning and stockpile implementation report Not later than 180 days after the date on which the report required by paragraph (1) is submitted, and every 180 days thereafter through December 31, 2028, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that— (A) details the actions being taken by the United States, if any, to pre-position, increase, stockpile, address shortfalls, and otherwise ensure that the War Reserves Stock Allies-Israel has, and assist Israel in ensuring that Israel has, sufficient quantities and types of munitions, including precision-guided munitions, to conduct the operations described in subparagraphs (B) through (D) of subsection (b)(1); and (B) includes a description of procedures implemented by the United States, if any, for rapidly replenishing, or assisting in the rapid replenishment of, stockpiles of such munitions for use by Israel as may be necessary. (3) Form The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may contain a classified annex. (4) Appropriate committees of Congress defined In this subsection, the term appropriate committees of Congress (A) the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. (d) Consolidation of reports (1) Section 1273 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (2) Section 1275 of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 ( Public Law 116–283 22 U.S.C. 2321h 1299J. Improvements to security cooperation workforce and defense acquisition workforce (a) Responsibilities of Secretary of Defense (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall, consistent with the requirements of section 384 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 1209 of this Act— (A) carry out activities to professionalize, and increase the resources available to, the security cooperation workforce so as to enable the streamlining and expediting of the foreign military sales process; and (B) seek to ensure that— (i) members of the defense acquisition workforce involved in the foreign military sales process are aware of evolving United States regional and country-level defense capability-building priorities; and (ii) members of the defense acquisition workforce are professionally evaluated using metrics to measure— (I) responsiveness to foreign partner requests; (II) ability to meet foreign partner capability and delivery schedule requirements; and (III) advancement of foreign capability-building priorities described in the guidance updated under subsection (b). (2) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the resources necessary to implement paragraph (1), including— (A) the anticipated costs of new personnel and training to carry out such paragraph; (B) the estimated increase in foreign military sales administrative user fees necessary to offset such costs; and (C) the feasibility and advisability of establishing, at the Department of Defense level or the military department level, a contracting capacity that— (i) is specific to the execution of contracts for foreign military sales; (ii) is fully funded by the Defense Security Cooperation Agency using foreign military sales administrative funds so as to ensure that such capacity is dedicated solely to foreign military sales contracting; (iii) is monitored by the Defense Security Cooperation Agency Chief Performance Office, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, to ensure effectiveness in meeting foreign military sales contracting requirements; and (iv) empowers the Director of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, to increase or decrease foreign military sales contracting capacity through the guidance updated under subsection (b). (b) Guidance (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall update, as necessary, Department of Defense guidance governing the execution of foreign military sales by the Department to ensure that such guidance— (A) incorporates the National Security Strategy and the National Defense Strategy; (B) is informed by the theater campaign plans and theater security cooperation strategies of the combatant commands; and (C) is disseminated to the security cooperation workforce and the defense acquisition workforce. (2) Elements The updated guidance required by paragraph (1) shall— (A) identify— (i) regional and country-level foreign defense capability-building priorities; and (ii) levels of urgency and desired timelines for achieving foreign capability-building objectives; and (B) provide guidance to the defense acquisition workforce regarding levels of resourcing, innovation, and risk tolerance that should be considered in meeting urgent needs. (c) Foreign Military Sales Continuous Process Improvement Board (1) Establishment The Secretary of Defense may establish a Foreign Military Sales Continuous Process Improvement Board (in this section referred to as the Board (A) improving the understanding, among officials of the Department, of ally and partner requirements; (B) enabling efficient reviews for release of technology; (C) providing allies and partner countries with relevant priority equipment; (D) accelerating acquisition and contracting support; (E) expanding the capacity of the defense industrial base; and (F) working with other departments and agencies to promote broad United States Government support. (2) Membership (A) In general The Board shall be composed of not fewer than seven members, each of whom shall have expertise in the foreign military sales process. (B) Restriction The Board may not have as a member— (i) an officer or employee of the Department of Defense; or (ii) a member of the United States Armed Forces. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) Defense acquisition workforce The term defense acquisition workforce chapter 87 (2) Security cooperation workforce The term security cooperation workforce 1299K. Modification of foreign military sales processing (a) Responses (1) Letters of request for pricing and availability The Secretary of Defense shall seek to ensure that an eligible foreign purchaser that has submitted a letter of request for pricing and availability data receives a response to the letter not later than 45 days after the date on which the letter is received by a United States security cooperation organization, the Defense Security Cooperation Agency, or other implementing agency. (2) Letters of request for letters of offer and acceptance The Secretary of Defense shall seek to ensure that an eligible foreign purchaser that has submitted a letter of request for a letter of offer and acceptance receives a response— (A) in the case of a letter of request for a blanket-order letter of offer and acceptance, cooperative logistics supply support arrangements, or associated amendments and modifications, not later than 45 days after the date on which the letter of request is received by a United States security cooperation organization, the Defense Security Cooperation Agency, or other implementing agency; (B) in the case of a letter of request for a defined-order letter of offer and acceptance or associated amendments and modifications, not later than 100 days after such date; and (C) in the case of a letter of request for a defined-order letter of offer and acceptance or associated amendments that involve extenuating factors, as approved by the Director of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency, not later than 150 days after such date. (3) Waiver The Secretary of Defense may waive paragraphs (1) and (2) if— (A) such a waiver is in the national security interests of the United States; and (B) not later than 5 days after exercising such waiver authority, the Secretary provides to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives notice of the exercise of such authority, including an explanation of the one or more reasons for failing to meet the applicable deadline. (b) Expansion of country prioritization With respect to foreign military sales to member countries of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, major non-NATO allies, major defense partners, and major security partners, the Secretary of Defense may assign a Defense Priorities and Allocations System order rating of DX (within the meaning of section 700.11 of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act)). (c) Definitions In this section: (1) Blanket-order letter of offer and acceptance The term blanket-order letter of offer and acceptance (A) does not include a definitive listing of items or quantities; and (B) specifies a maximum dollar amount against which orders for defense articles and services may be placed. (2) Cooperative logistics supply support arrangement The term cooperative logistics supply support arrangement (3) Defined-order letter of offer and acceptance The term defined-order letter of offer and acceptance (4) Implementing agency The term implementing agency (A) preparing a letter of offer and acceptance; (B) implementing a foreign military sales case; and (C) carrying out the overall management of the activities that— (i) will result in the delivery of the defense articles or services set forth in the letter of offer and acceptance; and (ii) was accepted by an eligible foreign purchaser. (5) Letter of request The term letter of request (A) means a written document— (i) submitted to a United States security cooperation organization, the Defense Security Cooperation Agency, or an implementing agency by an eligible foreign purchaser for the purpose of requesting to purchase or otherwise obtain a United States defense article or defense service through the foreign military sales process; and (ii) that contains all relevant information in such form as may be required by the Secretary of Defense; and (B) includes— (i) a formal letter; (ii) an e-mail; (iii) signed meeting minutes from a recognized official of the government of an eligible foreign purchaser; and (iv) any other form of written document, as determined by the Secretary of Defense or the Director of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency. (6) Major defense partner The term major defense partner (A) India; and (B) any other country, as designated by the Secretary of Defense. (7) Major non-NATO ally The term major non-NATO ally (A) has the meaning given the term in section 644 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 ( 22 U.S.C. 2403 (B) includes Taiwan, as required by section 1206 of the Security Assistance Act of 2002 ( Public Law 107–228 (8) Major security partner The term major security partner (A) the United Arab Emirates; (B) Bahrain; (C) Saudi Arabia; and (D) any other country, as designated by the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence. XIII COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 1301. Cooperative Threat Reduction funds (a) Funding allocation Of the $350,999,000 authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2024 in section 301 and made available by the funding table in division D for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program established under section 1321 of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Act ( 50 U.S.C. 3711 (1) For strategic offensive arms elimination, $6,815,000. (2) For chemical weapons destruction, $16,400,000. (3) For global nuclear security, $19,406,000. (4) For cooperative biological engagement, $228,030,000. (5) For proliferation prevention, $46,324,000. (6) For activities designated as Other Assessments/Administrative Costs, $34,024,000. (b) Specification of cooperative threat reduction funds Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in division D for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program shall be available for obligation for fiscal years 2024, 2025, and 2026. XIV Other authorizations A Military programs 1401. Working capital funds Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2024 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 1402. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2024 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. (b) Use Amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) are authorized for— (1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 ( 50 U.S.C. 1521 (2) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such Act. 1403. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2024 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 1404. Defense Inspector General Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2024 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 1405. Defense Health Program Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2024 for the Defense Health Program for use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing for the health of eligible beneficiaries, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. B National Defense Stockpile 1411. Recovery of rare earth elements and other strategic and critical materials through end-of-life equipment recycling The Secretary of Defense shall establish policies and procedures— (1) to identify end-of-life equipment of the Department of Defense that contains rare earth elements and other materials determined pursuant to section 3(a) of the Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act ( 50 U.S.C. 98b(a) (2) to identify, establish, and implement policies and procedures to recover such materials from such equipment for the purposes of reuse by the Department of Defense. 1412. Improvements to Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act (a) Purposes Section 2 of the Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act ( 50 U.S.C. 98a (d) To the maximum extent practicable and to reduce the reliance of the National Defense Stockpile program on appropriated funds, the National Defense Stockpile Manager shall seek to achieve positive cash flows from the recovery of strategic and critical materials pursuant to section 6(a)(5). . (b) Stockpile management Section 6 of such Act ( 50 U.S.C. 98e (1) in subsection (a)(5), by striking from excess from other Federal agencies, either directly as materials or embedded in excess-to-need, end-of-life items, or waste streams; (2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking subsection (a)(5) or (a)(6) subsection (a)(6) or (a)(7) (3) in subsection (d)(2), by striking subsection (a)(5) subsection (a)(6) (4) by adding at the end the following new subsections: (g) (1) The National Defense Stockpile Manager shall establish a pilot program to use, to the maximum extent practicable, commercial best practices in the acquisition and disposal of strategic and critical materials for the stockpile. (2) (A) The Stockpile Manager shall brief the congressional defense committees (as defined in section 101(a) of title 10, United States Code)— (i) as soon as practicable after the establishment of the pilot program under paragraph (1); and (ii) annually thereafter until the termination of the pilot program under paragraph (3). (B) The briefing required by subparagraph (A)(i) shall address— (i) the commercial best practices selected for use under the pilot program; (ii) how the Stockpile Manager determined which commercial best practices to select; and (iii) the plan of the Stockpile Manager for using such practices. (C) Each briefing required by subparagraph (A)(ii) shall provide a summary of— (i) how the Stockpile Manager has used commercial best practices under the pilot program during the year preceding the briefing; (ii) how many times the Stockpile Manager has used such practices; (iii) the outcome of each use of such practices; and (iv) any savings achieved or lessons learned as a result of the use of such practices. (3) The pilot program established under paragraph (1) shall terminate effective on the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024. (h) Unless otherwise necessary for national defense, the National Defense Stockpile Manager shall implement recovery programs under subsection (a)(5) to be cash flow positive. . (c) Development and conservation of reliable sources (1) In general Section 15 of such Act ( 50 U.S.C. 98h–6 15. Development and conservation of reliable sources (a) Duties Subject to subsection (c), the National Defense Stockpile Manager shall encourage the development and appropriate conservation of reliable sources of strategic and critical materials— (1) by purchasing, or making a commitment to purchase, strategic and critical materials from reliable sources when such materials are needed for the stockpile; (2) by contracting with facilities located in and owned and controlled by reliable sources, or making a commitment to contract with such facilities, for the processing or refining of strategic and critical materials in the stockpile when processing or refining is necessary to convert such materials into a form more suitable for storage or disposition or meeting stockpile requirements; (3) by qualifying facilities located in and owned and controlled by reliable sources, or qualifying strategic and critical materials produced by such facilities, to meet stockpile requirements; (4) by contracting with facilities located in and owned and controlled by reliable sources to recycle strategic and critical materials to meet stockpile requirements or increase the balance of the National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund under section 9; and (5) by entering into an agreement to co-fund a bankable feasibility study for a project for the development of strategic and critical materials located in and owned and controlled by a reliable source, if the agreement— (A) limits the liability of the stockpile to not more than the total funding provided by the Federal Government; (B) limits the funding contribution of the Federal Government to not more than 50 percent of the cost of the bankable feasibility study; and (C) does not obligate the Federal Government to purchase strategic and critical materials from the reliable source. (b) Additional authorities (1) Extended contracting authority (A) In general The term of a contract or commitment made under subsection (a) may not exceed ten years. (B) Preexisting contracts A contract entered into before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 for a term of more than ten years may be extended, on or after such date of enactment, for a total of not more than an additional ten years pursuant to any option or options set forth in the contract. (2) Matters relating to co-funding of bankable feasibility studies To the extent authorized by Congress pursuant to the Defense Production Act of 1950 ( 50 U.S.C. 4501 et seq. (c) Proposed transactions included in annual materials plan Descriptions of proposed transactions under subsection (a) shall be included in the Annual Materials and Operations Plan. Changes to any such transaction, or the addition of a transaction not included in such plan, shall be made in accordance with section 5. (d) Availability of funds The authority of the National Defense Stockpile Manager to enter into obligations under this section is effective for any fiscal year only to the extent that funds in the National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund under section 9 are adequate to meet such obligations. (e) Bankable feasibility study defined In this section, the term bankable feasibility study (1) of the selected development option for a strategic and critical materials project that includes appropriately detailed assessments of realistically assumed extraction, processing, metallurgical, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social, and governmental considerations and any other relevant operational factors and detailed financial analysis, that are necessary to demonstrate at the time of reporting that production is reasonably justified; and (2) that may reasonably serve as the basis for a final decision by a proponent of a project or financial institution to proceed with, or finance, the development of the project. . (2) Conforming amendments (A) Materials research and development Section 8(a) of such Act ( 50 U.S.C. 98g(a) (i) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking or in its territories or possessions, its territories or possessions, or in a reliable source (ii) in paragraph (2), by striking in order to— mineral products. in order to develop new sources of strategic and critical materials, develop substitutes, or conserve domestic sources and reliable sources of supply for such strategic and critical materials. (B) Definitions Section 12 of such Act ( 50 U.S.C. 98h–3 (i) The term reliable source (I) the United States or any territory or possession of the United States; (II) a country of the national technology and industrial base, as defined in section 4801 of title 10, United States Code; or (III) a qualifying country, as defined in section 225.003 of the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement. . (d) Technical amendment Subsection (e) of section 10 of such Act ( 50 U.S.C. 98h–1 (e) Application of provisions relating to Federal advisory committees Section 1013 of title 5, United States Code, shall not apply to the Board. . 1413. Authority to dispose of materials from the National Defense Stockpile Pursuant to section 5(b) of the Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act ( 50 U.S.C. 98d(b) (1) 8 short tons of beryllium. (2) 154,043 short dry tons of metallurgical grade manganese ore. (3) 5,000 kilograms of germanium. (4) 91,413 pounds of pan-based carbon fibers. (5) Not more than 1,000 short tons of materials transferred from another department or agency of the United States to the National Defense Stockpile under section 4(b) of such Act ( 50 U.S.C. 98c(b) 1414. Beginning balances of the National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund for audit purposes For purposes of an audit conducted under chapter 9A 50 U.S.C. 98h (1) the ending balance of $313,633,491.15 reported in the Central Accounting Reporting System of the Department of the Treasury for September 30, 2021, is the Fund Balance with Treasury ending balance on that date; (2) the Total Actual Resources–Collected opening balance for October 1, 2021, for United States Standard General Ledger Account 420100 is $314,548,154.42, as recorded in official accounting records; and (3) the Unapportioned–Unexpired Authority ending balance for September 30, 2021, for United States Standard General Ledger Account 445000 is $216,976,300.69, as recorded in official accounting records. C Other matters 1421. Authority for transfer of funds to joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois (a) Authority for transfer of funds Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 1405 and available for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance, $172,000,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( Public Law 111–84 (b) Treatment of transferred funds For purposes of subsection (a)(2) of such section 1704, any funds transferred under subsection (a) shall be treated as amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the purpose of such a transfer. (c) Use of transferred funds For purposes of subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement covered by section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( Public Law 110–417 1422. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2024 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund the sum of $77,000,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces Retirement Home. 1423. Modification of leasing authority of Armed Forces Retirement Home (a) Agreements; approval and notification Section 1511(i) of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 ( 24 U.S.C. 411(i) (9) Before entering into a lease described in this subsection, the Chief Operating Officer may enter into an agreement with a potential lessee providing for a period of exclusivity, access, study, or for similar purposes. The agreement shall provide for the payment (in cash or in kind) by the potential lessee of consideration for the agreement unless the Chief Operating Officer determines that payment of consideration will not promote the purpose and financial stability of the Retirement Home or be in the public interest. (10) No further approval by the Secretary of Defense, nor notification or report to Congress, shall be required for subordinate leases under this subsection unless the facts or terms of the original lease have materially changed. . (b) Administration of funds Section 1511(i)(7) of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 ( 24 U.S.C. 411(i) (1) by inserting an agreement with a potential lessee or The proceeds from (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting , to remain available for obligation and expenditure to finance expenses of the Retirement Home related to the formation and administration of agreements and leases entered into under the provisions of this subsection. XV Space activities, strategic programs, and intelligence matters A Space activities 1501. Acquisition strategy for Phase 3 of the National Security Space Launch program (a) Fiscal years 2025 through 2029 With respect to the acquisition strategy for Phase 3 of the National Security Space Launch program, for fiscal years 2025 through 2029, the Secretary of Defense shall establish— (1) a low-risk launch program, to be known as Lane One (2) a launch program, similar to the Phase Two National Security Assured Access Launch program, to be known as Lane Two (b) Fiscal years 2027 through 2029 With respect to the acquisition strategy for Phase 3 of the National Security Space Launch program, for fiscal years 2027 through 2029, the Secretary of Defense shall establish an accession launch program, to be known as Lane Two A 1502. Initial operating capability for Advanced Tracking and Launch Analysis System and system-level review (a) Advanced tracking and launch analysis system (1) Date for initial operating capability Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall— (A) designate a date for the delivery of the initial operating capability for the Advanced Tracking and Launch Analysis System (ATLAS); and (B) notify the congressional defense committees of such date. (2) Effect of failure to timely deliver If the initial operating capability for ATLAS is not achieved by the date designated under paragraph (1)(A), the Secretary shall— (A) terminate the ATLAS program; (B) designate an alternative program option that provides a comparable capability to the capability intended to be provided by ATLAS; and (C) not later than 30 days after such date, notify the congressional defense committees with respect to— (i) such termination; (ii) the designated alternative program option; (iii) the justification for selecting such option; and (iv) the estimated time and total costs to completion of such option. (b) System-level review (1) In general The Secretary shall enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center under which the federally funded research and development center shall, not less frequently than every 2 years through 2032, conduct a review of the space command and control software acquisition program to assess the ability of such program to build a software framework that integrates multiple aspects of space operations to enable the warfighter to command and control space assets in a time of conflict. (2) Elements Each review under paragraph (1) shall consider the integration into such software framework of the following: (A) Sensor data applicable to the command and control of space assets. (B) Information contained in the Unified Data Library relating to the number and location of space objects. (C) The ability to control space assets based on such data and information. (D) Any other matter the Secretary considers necessary. (3) Briefing The Secretary shall provide the congressional defense committees with a briefing on the findings of each review under paragraph (1), including— (A) an assessment of any deficiency identified in the review; and (B) a plan to address such deficiency in a timely manner. 1503. Department of the Air Force responsibility for space-based ground and airborne moving target indication (a) In general The Department of the Air Force shall be responsible for— (1) serving as the final authority for the tasking of space-based ground and airborne moving target indication systems that— (A) are primarily or fully funded by the Department of Defense; and (B) provide near real-time, direct support to satisfy theater operations; and (2) presenting such capability to the combatant commands to accomplish the warfighting missions of the combatant commands under the Unified Command Plan. (b) Milestone development authority Subject to section 4204 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Air Force, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, shall be the Milestone A approval (as defined in section 4211 of such title) decision authority for space-related acquisition programs for ground and airborne moving target indication collection assets described in subsection (a) that are primarily or fully funded within the Military Intelligence Program. 1504. Principal Military Deputy for Space Acquisition and Integration Section 9016(b)(6) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C); and (2) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following new subparagraph (B): (B) The Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Space Acquisition and Integration shall have a Principle Military Deputy for Space Acquisition and Integration, who shall be an officer of the Space Force on active duty. The Principal Military Deputy for Space Acquisition and Integration shall be appointed from among officers who have significant experience in the areas of acquisition and program management. The position of Principal Military Deputy for Space Acquisition and Integration shall be designated as a critical acquisition position under section 1731 of this title. In the event of a vacancy in the position of Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Space Acquisition and Integration, the Principal Military Deputy for Space Acquisition and Integration may serve as Acting Assistant Secretary for Space Acquisition and Integration for a period of not more than one year. . 1505. Use of middle tier acquisition authority for Space Development Agency acquisition program (a) In general The Director of the Space Development Agency shall use the middle tier of acquisition authority, consistent with section 804 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( Public Law 114–92 10 U.S.C. 3201 Operation of the Middle Tier of Acquisition (MTA) (b) Rapid prototyping and fielding Any tranche of satellites or associated systems developed and fielded under subsection (a) shall have a level of maturity that allows such satellites or systems to be rapidly prototyped within an acquisition program or rapidly fielded within five years of the development of an approved requirement. (c) Designation as major capability acquisition (1) In general The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment may designate a tranche described in subsection (a) as a major capability acquisition program, consistent with Department of Defense Instruction 5000.80, entitled Operation of the Middle Tier of Acquisition (MTA) (2) Notice to Congress Not later than 90 days before the date on which a designation under paragraph (1) is made, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall notify the congressional defense committees of the intent to so designate and provide a justification for such designation. 1506. Special authority for provision of commercial space launch support services (a) In general Chapter 135 section 2276 2276a. Special authority for provision of commercial space launch support services (a) In general The Secretary of a military department, pursuant to the authority provided by this section and any other provision of law, may support Federal and commercial space launch capacity on any domestic real property under the control of the Secretary through the provision of space launch support services. (b) Provision of launch equipment and services to commercial entities (1) Agreement authority (A) In general The Secretary concerned may enter into a contract, or conduct any other transaction, with a commercial entity that intends to conduct space launch activities on a military installation under the jurisdiction of the Secretary, including a contract or other transaction for the provision of supplies, services, equipment, and construction needed for commercial space launch. (B) Nondelegation The Secretary may not delegate the authority provided in subparagraph (A). (2) Agreement costs (A) Direct costs A contract entered into, or a transaction conducted, under paragraph (1) shall include a provision that requires the commercial entity entering into the contract or conducting the transaction to reimburse the Department of Defense for all direct costs to the United States that are associated with the goods, services, and equipment provided to the commercial entity under the contract or transaction. (B) Indirect costs A contract entered into, or a transaction conducted, under paragraph (1) may— (i) include a provision that requires the commercial entity to reimburse the Department of Defense for such indirect costs as the Secretary concerned considers to be fair and reasonable; and (ii) provide for the recovery of indirect costs through establishment of a rate, fixed price, or similar mechanism the Secretary concerned considers to be fair and reasonable. (3) Retention of funds collected from commercial users Amounts collected from a commercial entity under paragraph (2) shall be credited to the appropriation accounts under which the costs associated with the contract (direct and indirect) were incurred. (4) Regulations The Secretary shall promulgate regulations to carry out this subsection. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) Space launch The term space launch (2) Commercial entity; commercial The terms commercial entity commercial . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections for chapter 135 section 2276 2276a. Special authority for provision of commercial space launch support services. . 1507. Treatment of Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Resiliency, Modifications, and Improvements program as acquisition category 1D program The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall treat the Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Resiliency, Modifications, and Improvements program of the Air Force (Program Element 0604201F) as an acquisition category 1D program, and the authority to manage such program may not be delegated. 1508. Briefing on classification practices and foreign disclosure policies required for combined space operations (a) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall provide a briefing to the appropriate committees of Congress on the classification practices and foreign disclosure policies required to enable the development and conduct of combined space operations among the following countries: (1) Australia. (2) Canada. (3) France. (4) Germany. (5) New Zealand. (6) The United Kingdom. (7) The United States. (8) Any other ally or partner country, as determined by the Secretary of Defense or the Director of National Intelligence. (b) Elements The briefing required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) The military and national intelligence information required to be shared with the countries described in subsection (a) so as to enable the development and conduct combined space operations. (2) The policy, organizational, or other barriers that currently prevent such information sharing for combined space operations. (3) The actions being taken by the Department of Defense and the intelligence community (as defined in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 ( 50 U.S.C. 3003 (4) Any statutory changes required to remove such barriers. (5) Any other matter, as determined by the Secretary of Defense or the Director of National Intelligence. (c) Implementation update Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall provide a briefing to the appropriate committees of Congress on the implementation of the actions described in subsection (b)(3). (d) Appropriate committees of Congress In this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress (1) the congressional defense committees; and (2) the congressional intelligence committees (as defined in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 ( 50 U.S.C. 3003 1509. Limitation on availability of certain funds relating to selection of permanent location for headquarters of United States Space Command (a) Limitation on availability of funds for military construction projects None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2024 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended for a military construction project (as described in section 2801(b) of title 10, United States Code) for the construction or modification of facilities for temporary or permanent use by the United States Space Command for headquarters operations until the report required under subsection (c) is submitted. (b) Limitation on availability of funds for travel expenditures Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2024 to the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force for travel expenditures, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the report required under subsection (c) is submitted. (c) Report The Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the justification for the selection of a permanent location for headquarters of the United States Space Command. B Nuclear forces 1511. Prohibition on reduction of the intercontinental ballistic missiles of the United States (a) Prohibition Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2024 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for the following, and the Department may not otherwise take any action to do the following: (1) Reduce, or prepare to reduce, the responsiveness or alert level of the intercontinental ballistic missiles of the United States. (2) Reduce, or prepare to reduce, the quantity of deployed intercontinental ballistic missiles of the United States to a number less than 400. (b) Exception The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to any of the following activities: (1) The maintenance, sustainment, or replacement of intercontinental ballistic missiles. (2) Ensuring the safety, security, or reliability of intercontinental ballistic missiles. 1512. Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile program silo activity The LGM–35A Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile program shall refurbish and make operable not fewer than 150 silos for intercontinental ballistic missiles at each of the following locations: (1) Francis E. Warren Air Force Base, Laramie County, Wyoming. (2) Malmstrom Air Force Base, Cascade County, Montana. (3) Minot Air Force Base, Ward County, North Dakota. 1513. Matters relating to the acquisition and deployment of the Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile weapon system (a) Authority for multi-year procurement Subject to section 3501 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Air Force may enter into one or more multi-year contracts for the procurement of up to 659 Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missiles and for subsystems associated with such missiles. (b) Authority for advance procurement The Secretary of the Air Force may enter into one or more contracts, beginning in fiscal year 2024, for advance procurement associated with the Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missiles for which authorization to enter into a multi-year procurement contract is provided under subsection (a), and for subsystems associated with such missiles in economic order quantities when cost savings are achievable. (c) Condition for out-year contract payments A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2024 is subject to the availability of appropriations or funds for that purpose for such later fiscal year. (d) Mandatory inclusion of pre-priced option in certain circumstances (1) In general If the total base quantity of Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missiles to be procured through all contracts entered into under subsection (a) is less than 659, the Secretary of the Air Force shall ensure that one or more of the contracts includes a pre-priced option for the procurement of additional Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missiles such that the sum of such base quantity and the number of such missiles that may be procured through the exercise of such options is equal to 659 missiles. (2) Definitions In this subsection: (A) Base quantity The term base quantity (B) Pre-priced option The term pre-priced option (e) Limitation The Secretary of the Air Force may not modify a contract entered into under subsection (a) if the modification would increase the per unit price of the Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missiles by more than 10 percent above the target per unit price specified in the original contract for such missiles under subsection (a). (f) Modifications to the Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Site Activation Task Force Section 1638 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 (1) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting , who shall report directly to the Commander of Air Force Global Strike Command Modernization (2) by striking subsection (d)(1) and inserting the following: (1) Weapon system For purposes of nomenclature and acquisition life cycle activities ranging from development through sustainment and demilitarization, each wing level configuration of the LGM-35A Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile shall be a weapon system. . 1514. Plan for decreasing the time to upload additional warheads to the intercontinental ballistic missile fleet (a) In general The Secretary of the Air Force, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall develop a plan to decrease the amount of time required to upload additional warheads to the intercontinental ballistic missile force. (b) Elements The plan required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An assessment of the storage capacity of weapons storage areas and any weapons generation facilities at covered bases, including the capacity of each covered base to store additional warheads. (2) An assessment of the current nuclear warhead transportation capacity of the National Nuclear Security Administration and associated timelines for transporting additional nuclear warheads to covered bases. (3) An evaluation of the capacity of the maintenance squadrons and security forces at covered bases and the associated timelines for adding warheads to the intercontinental ballistic missile force. (4) An identification of actions that would address any identified limitations and increase the readiness of the intercontinental ballistic missile force to upload additional warheads. (5) An evaluation of courses of actions to upload additional warheads to a portion of the intercontinental ballistic missile force. (6) An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of initiating immediate deployment of W78 warheads to a single wing of the intercontinental ballistic missile force as a hedge against delay of the LGM-35A Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile. (7) A funding plan for carrying out actions identified in paragraphs (4) and (5). (c) Submission to Congress Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall submit to the congressional defense committees the plan required by subsection (a). (d) Form The plan required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (e) Briefing Not later than 30 days after the submission of the plan required by subsection (a), the Secretary of the Air Force and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall brief the congressional defense committees on the actions being pursued to implement the plan. (f) Covered base defined The term covered base (1) Francis E. Warren Air Force Base, Laramie County, Wyoming. (2) Malmstrom Air Force Base, Cascade County, Montana. (3) Minot Air Force Base, Ward County, North Dakota. 1515. Tasking and oversight authority with respect to intercontinental ballistic missile site activation task force for Sentinel Program Section 1638 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 (1) redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and (2) inserting after subsection (d), the following new subsection (e): (e) Delegation of authority The Secretary of Defense shall— (1) not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, delegate to the Commander of the Air Force Global Strike Command such tasking and oversight authorities, as the Secretary considers necessary, with respect to other components of the Department of Defense participating in the Task Force; and (2) not later than 30 days after the date of such delegation of authority, notify the congressional defense committees of the delegation. . 1516. Long-term sustainment of Sentinel ICBM guidance system (a) In general Prior to issuing a Milestone C decision for the program to develop the LGM–35A Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile system (referred to in this section as the Sentinel (b) Certification elements The certification described in subsection (a) shall include a list of capabilities to maintain and advance— (1) accelerometers; (2) gyroscopes; (3) guidance computers; (4) specialized mechanical and retaining assemblies; (5) test equipment; and (6) such other components to ensure the guidance system will be maintained and modernized over the life of the Sentinel. 1517. Sense of Senate on Polaris Sales Agreement (a) Findings The Senate finds the following: (1) On December 21, 1962, President John F. Kennedy and Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Harold Macmillan met in Nassau, Bahamas, and issued a joint statement (commonly referred to as the Statement on Nuclear Defense Systems (2) On April 6, 1963, Secretary of State Dean Rusk and Her Majesty's Ambassador to the United States David Ormsby-Gore signed the Polaris Sales Agreement, reaffirming the Statement on Nuclear Defense Systems and agreeing that the United States Government shall provide and the Government of the United Kingdom shall purchase from the United States Government Polaris missiles, equipment, and supporting services. (3) The HMS Resolution launched the first Polaris missile of the United Kingdom on February 15, 1968, and, in 1969, commenced the first strategic deterrent patrol for the United Kingdom, initiating a continuous at-sea deterrent posture for the United Kingdom that remains in effect. (4) The Polaris Sales Agreement was amended to include the Trident II (D5) strategic weapon system on October 19, 1982, in Washington, D.C., through an exchange of notes between Secretary of State Jonathan Howe and Her Majesty's Ambassador to the United States Oliver Wright. (5) Through an exchange of letters in 2008 between the Secretary of Defense the Honorable Robert Gates and the Secretary of State for Defence of the United Kingdom the Right Honorable Desmond Browne and under the auspices of the Polaris Sales Agreement, the United States Government and the Government of the United Kingdom agreed to continue cooperation to design a common missile compartment for the follow-on ballistic missile submarines of each nation. (b) Sense of the Senate It is the sense of the Senate that the Senate— (1) recognizes the 60th anniversary of the Polaris Sales Agreement between the United States and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; (2) congratulates the Royal Navy for steadfastly maintaining the Continuous At-Sea Deterrent; (3) Recognizes the important contribution of the Continuous At-Sea Deterrent to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization; (4) reaffirms that the United Kingdom is a valued and special ally of the United States; and (5) looks forward to continuing and strengthening the shared commitment of the United States and the United Kingdom to sustain submarine-based strategic deterrents well into the future. 1518. Matters relating to the nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missile (a) Program treatment Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall— (1) establish a program for the development of a nuclear-armed, sea-launched cruise missile capability; (2) designate such program as an acquisition category 1D program, to be managed consistent with the provisions of Department of Defense Instruction 5000.85 (relating to major capability acquisition); (3) initiate a nuclear weapon project for the W80-4 ALT warhead, at phase 6.2 of the phase 6.X process (relating to feasibility study and down select), to align with the program described in paragraph (1); (4) submit to the National Nuclear Security Administration a formal request, through the Nuclear Weapons Council, for participation in and support for the W80-4 ALT warhead project; and (5) designate the Department of the Navy as the military department to lead the W80-4 ALT nuclear weapon program for the Department of Defense. (b) Initial operational capability The Secretary of Defense and the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall take such actions as necessary to ensure the program described in subsection (a) achieves initial operational capability, as defined jointly by the Secretary of the Navy and the Commander of United States Strategic Command, by not later than fiscal year 2035. (c) Limitation The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment may not approve a Full Rate Production Decision or authorize Full Scale Production (as those terms are defined in the memorandum of the Nuclear Weapons Council entitled Procedural Guidelines for the Phase 6.X Process (d) Briefing (1) In general Beginning not later than November 1, 2023, and on March 1 and September 1 of each year thereafter, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in coordination with the Secretary of the Navy, the Administrator for Nuclear Security, and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall jointly brief the congressional defense committees on the progress of the program described in subsection (a). (2) Contents Each briefing required under paragraph (1) shall include— (A) a description of significant achievements of the program described in subsection (a) completed during the period specified in paragraph (3) and any planned objectives that were not achieved during such period; (B) for the 180-day period following the briefing— (i) planned objectives for the programs; and (ii) anticipated spending plans for the programs; (C) a description of any notable technical hurdles that could impede timely completion of the programs; and (D) any other information the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment considers appropriate. (3) Period specified The period specified in this paragraph is— (A) in the case of the first briefing required by paragraph (1), the 180-day period preceding the briefing; and (B) in the case of any subsequent such briefing, the period since the previous such briefing. (4) Termination The requirement to provide briefings under paragraph (1) shall terminate on the date that the program described in subsection (a) achieve initial operational capability, as defined jointly by the Secretary of the Navy and the Commander of United States Strategic Command. (e) Phase 6.X process defined In this section, the term phase 6.X process Procedural Guidelines for the Phase 6.X Process 1519. Operational timeline for Strategic Automated Command and Control System (a) In general The Secretary of the Air Force shall develop a replacement of the Strategic Automated Command and Control System (SACCS) by not later than the date that the LGM–35A Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile program reaches initial operational capability. (b) Replacement capabilities The replacement required by subsection (a) shall— (1) replace the SACCS base processors; (2) replace the SACCS processors at launch control centers; (3) provide internet protocol connectivity for wing-wide command centers of the LGM–35A Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile program; (4) include such other capabilities necessary to address the evolving requirements of the LGM–35A Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile program as the Secretary considers appropriate. 1520. Amendment to annual report on the plan for the nuclear weapons stockpile, nuclear weapons complex, nuclear weapons delivery systems, and nuclear weapons command and control systems Section 492a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (d) Independent assessment by United States Strategic Command (1) In general Not later than 150 days after the submission to Congress of the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the Commander of United States Strategic Command shall complete an independent assessment of the sufficiency of the execution of acquisition, construction, and recapitalization programs of the Department of Defense and the National Nuclear Security Administration to modernize the nuclear forces of the United States and meet current and future deterrence requirements. (2) Contents The assessment required under paragraph (1) shall evaluate the ongoing execution of modernization programs associated with— (A) the nuclear weapons design, production, and sustainment infrastructure; (B) the nuclear weapons stockpile; (C) the delivery systems for nuclear weapons; and (D) the nuclear command, control, and communications system. (3) Routing and submission (A) Submission to Nuclear Weapons Council Not later than 15 days after completion of the assessment required by paragraph (1), the Commander of United States Strategic Command shall— (i) submit the assessment to the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council; and (ii) notify the congressional defense committees that the assessment has been submitted to the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council. (B) Submission to Congress Not later than 15 days after the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council receives the assessment required by paragraph (1), the Chairman shall transmit the assessment, without change, to the congressional defense committees. . 1521. Technical amendment to additional report matters on strategic delivery systems Section 495(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1)— (1) by striking before fiscal year 2020 prior to the expiration of the Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 2010, and entered into force on February 5, 2011 (commonly referred to as the New START Treaty (2) by striking 1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 492(a) of title 10, United States Code, 1522. Amendment to study of weapons programs that allow Armed Forces to address hard and deeply buried targets Section 1674 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 (1) in subsection (e)— (A) in the heading, by striking on Use of Funds (B) by striking none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2023 for the Department of Defense or the Department of Energy for the deactivation, dismantlement, or retirement of the B83–1 nuclear gravity bomb may be obligated or expended neither the Secretary of Defense nor the Secretary of Energy may take any action (2) in subsection (f), by striking on the use of funds under in 1523. Limitation on use of funds until provision of Department of Defense information to Government Accountability Office Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2024 for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide, and available for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Comptroller General of the United States notifies the congressional defense committees that the Secretary of Defense has fully complied with information requests by the Government Accountability Office with respect to the conduct of the study required by section 1652 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 C Missile defense 1531. Designation of official responsible for missile defense of Guam Paragraph (1) of section 1660(b) of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 (1) Designation The Secretary of Defense shall designate the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment as the senior official of the Department of Defense who shall be responsible for the missile defense of Guam during the period preceding the date specified in paragraph (5). . 1532. Selection of a Director of the Missile Defense Agency Subsection (a) of section 205 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (a) Director of the Missile Defense Agency There is a Director of the Missile Defense Agency who shall be appointed for a period of six years by the President from among the general officers on active duty in the Army, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force or from among the flag officers on active duty in the Navy. . 1533. Modification of requirement for Comptroller General of the United States review and assessment of missile defense acquisition programs Section 232(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ( Public Law 112–81 Public Law 114–92 Public Law 116–283 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking through 2025 through 2030 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking through 2026 through 2031 (3) in paragraph (3)— (A) in the paragraph heading, by striking emerging other Department of Defense missile defense acquisition efforts and related (B) by striking emerging issues and emerging issues, any Department of Defense missile defense acquisition efforts, and any other related issue and (C) by inserting on a mutually agreed upon date 1534. Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system and Israeli cooperative missile defense program co-development and co-production (a) Iron dome short-range rocket defense system (1) Availability of funds Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2024 for procurement, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency, not more than $80,000,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel to procure components for the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system through co-production of such components in the United States by industry of the United States. (2) Conditions (A) Agreement Funds described in paragraph (1) for the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program shall be available subject to the terms and conditions in the Agreement Between the Department of Defense of the United States of America and the Ministry of Defense of the State of Israel Concerning Iron Dome Defense System Procurement, signed on March 5, 2014, as amended to include co-production for Tamir interceptors. (B) Certification Not later than 30 days prior to the initial obligation of funds described in paragraph (1), the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees— (i) a certification that the amended bilateral international agreement specified in subparagraph (A) is being implemented as provided in such agreement; (ii) an assessment detailing any risks relating to the implementation of such agreement; and (iii) for system improvements resulting in modified Iron Dome components and Tamir interceptor sub-components, a certification that the Government of Israel has demonstrated successful completion of Production Readiness Reviews, including the validation of production lines, the verification of component conformance, and the verification of performance to specification as defined in the Iron Dome Defense System Procurement Agreement, as further amended. (b) Israeli cooperative missile defense program, david's sling weapon system co-production (1) In general Subject to paragraph (3), of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2024 for procurement, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency not more than $40,000,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel to procure the David's Sling Weapon System, including for co-production of parts and components in the United States by United States industry. (2) Agreement Provision of funds specified in paragraph (1) shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the bilateral co-production agreement, including— (A) a one-for-one cash match is made by Israel or in another matching amount that otherwise meets best efforts (as mutually agreed to by the United States and Israel); and (B) co-production of parts, components, and all-up rounds (if appropriate) in the United States by United States industry for the David's Sling Weapon System is not less than 50 percent. (3) Certification and assessment The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees— (A) a certification that the Government of Israel has demonstrated the successful completion of the knowledge points, technical milestones, and Production Readiness Reviews required by the research, development, and technology agreement and the bilateral co-production agreement for the David's Sling Weapon System; and (B) an assessment detailing any risks relating to the implementation of such agreement. (c) Israeli cooperative missile defense program, arrow 3 upper tier interceptor program co-production (1) In general Subject to paragraph (2), of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2024 for procurement, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency not more than $80,000,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel for the Arrow 3 Upper Tier Interceptor Program, including for co-production of parts and components in the United States by United States industry. (2) Certification The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a certification that— (A) the Government of Israel has demonstrated the successful completion of the knowledge points, technical milestones, and Production Readiness Reviews required by the research, development, and technology agreement for the Arrow 3 Upper Tier Interceptor Program; (B) funds specified in paragraph (1) will be provided on the basis of a one-for-one cash match made by Israel or in another matching amount that otherwise meets best efforts (as mutually agreed to by the United States and Israel); (C) the United States has entered into a bilateral international agreement with Israel that establishes, with respect to the use of such funds— (i) in accordance with subparagraph (D), the terms of co-production of parts and components on the basis of the greatest practicable co-production of parts, components, and all-up rounds (if appropriate) by United States industry and minimizes nonrecurring engineering and facilitization expenses to the costs needed for co-production; (ii) complete transparency on the requirement of Israel for the number of interceptors and batteries that will be procured, including with respect to the procurement plans, acquisition strategy, and funding profiles of Israel; (iii) technical milestones for co-production of parts and components and procurement; (iv) a joint affordability working group to consider cost reduction initiatives; and (v) joint approval processes for third-party sales; and (D) the level of co-production described in subparagraph (C)(i) for the Arrow 3 Upper Tier Interceptor Program is not less than 50 percent. (d) Number In carrying out paragraph (2) of subsection (b) and paragraph (2) of subsection (c), the Under Secretary may submit— (1) one certification covering both the David's Sling Weapon System and the Arrow 3 Upper Tier Interceptor Program; or (2) separate certifications for each respective system. (e) Timing The Under Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the certification and assessment under subsection (b)(3) and the certification under subsection (c)(2) no later than 30 days before the funds specified in paragraph (1) of subsections (b) and (c) for the respective system covered by the certification are provided to the Government of Israel. (f) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees (1) The congressional defense committees. (2) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the (3) Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1535. Modification of scope of program accountability matrices requirements for next generation interceptors for missile defense of the United States homeland Section 1668(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 (1) by inserting and the product development phase technology development phase (2) in paragraph (7), by striking enter the product development phase enter the production phase 1536. Limitation on availability of funds for Office of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation until submission of missile defense roles and responsibilities report Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2024 by section 301 for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide, and available for the Office of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees the report required by section 1675(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 1537. Integrated air and missile defense architecture for the Indo-Pacific region (a) Strategy required The Commander of United States Indo-Pacific Command shall, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, the Commander of United States Northern Command, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, and the Director of the Joint Integrated Air and Missile Defense Organization, develop a comprehensive strategy for developing, acquiring, and operationally establishing an integrated air and missile defense architecture for the United States Indo-Pacific Command area of responsibility. (b) Strategy components At a minimum, the strategy required by subsection (a) shall address the following: (1) The sensing, tracking, and intercepting capabilities required to address the full range of credible missile threats to— (A) the Hawaiian Islands; (B) the island of Guam and other islands in the greater Marianas region, as determined necessary by the Commander of United States Indo-Pacific Command; (C) other United States territories within the area of responsibility of United States Indo-Pacific Command; and (D) United States forces deployed within the territories of other nations within such area of responsibility. (2) The appropriate balance of missile detection, tracking, defense, and defeat capabilities within such area of responsibility. (3) A command and control network for integrating missile detection, tracking, defense, and defeat capabilities across such area of responsibility. (4) A time-phased scheduling construct for fielding the constituent systems that will comprise the integrated air and missile defense architecture for such area of responsibility. (c) Annual report (1) In general Not later than March 15, 2024, and not less frequently than once each year thereafter, the Commander of United States Indo-Pacific Command shall, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, the Commander of United States Northern Command, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, and the Director of the Joint Integrated Air and Missile Defense Organization, submit to the congressional defense committees an annual report outlining the following with regard to the strategy developed pursuant to subsection (a): (A) The activities conducted and progress made in developing and implementing the strategy over the previous calendar year. (B) The planned activities for developing and implementing the strategy in the upcoming year. (C) A description of likely risks and impediments to the successful implementation of the strategy. (2) Termination The requirements of paragraph (1) shall terminate on the earlier of the following: (A) March 15, 2029. (B) The date on which a comprehensive integrated air and missile defense architecture for the area of responsibility of United States Indo-Pacific Command has achieved initial operational capability, as determined jointly by the Commander of United States Indo-Pacific Command and the Director of the Missile Defense Agency. (d) Limitations Of the equipment and components previously procured by the Department of Defense for the purposes of constructing the Homeland Defense Radar–Hawaii, none of such assets may be repurposed for other uses until the first annual report required by subsection (c)(1) is submitted to the congressional defense committees pursuant to such subsection. 1538. Modification of National Missile Defense policy Section 1681(a) of the of the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 10 U.S.C. 4205 (a) Policy It is the policy of the United States to— (1) maintain and improve, with funding subject to the annual authorization of appropriations and the annual appropriation of funds for National Missile Defense— (A) an effective, layered missile defense system capable of defending the territory of the United States against the developing and increasingly complex missile threat; and (B) an effective regional missile defense system capable of defending the allies, partners, and deployed forces of the United States against increasingly complex missile threats; and (2) rely on nuclear deterrence to address more sophisticated and larger quantity near-peer intercontinental missile threats to the homeland of the United States. . D Other matters 1541. Electronic warfare (a) In general Part I of subtitle A of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new chapter: 25 Electronic Warfare Sec. 500. Electronic Warfare Executive Committee. 500a. Guidance on the electronic warfare mission area and joint electromagnetic spectrum operations. 500b. Annual report on electronic warfare strategy of the Department of Defense. 500c. Annual assessment of budget with respect to electronic warfare capabilities. 500d. Electromagnetic spectrum superiority implementation plan. 500e. Electromagnetic Spectrum Enterprise Operational Lead for Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations. 500f. Evaluations of abilities of armed forces and combatant commands to perform electromagnetic spectrum operations missions. 500. Electronic Warfare Executive Committee (a) In general There is within the Department of Defense an Electronic Warfare Executive Committee (in this section referred to as the Executive Committee (b) Purposes The Executive Committee shall— (1) serve as the principal forum within the Department of Defense to inform, coordinate, and evaluate matters relating to electronic warfare; (2) provide senior oversight, coordination, and budget and capability harmonization with respect to such matters; and (3) act as an advisory body to the Secretary of Defense, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, and the Management Action Group of the Deputy Secretary with respect to such matters. (c) Responsibilities The Executive Committee shall— (1) advise key senior level decision-making bodies of the Department of Defense with respect to the development and implementation of acquisition investments relating to electronic warfare and electromagnetic spectrum operations of the Department, including relevant acquisition policies, projects, programs, modeling, and test and evaluation infrastructure; (2) provide a forum to enable synchronization and integration support with respect to the development and acquisition of electronic warfare capabilities— (A) by aligning the processes of the Department for requirements, research, development, acquisition, testing, and sustainment; and (B) carrying out other related duties; and (3) act as the senior level review forum for the portfolio of capability investments of the Department relating to electronic warfare and electromagnetic spectrum operations and other related matters. (d) Coordination with intelligence community The Executive Committee, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, shall coordinate with the intelligence community (as defined in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 ( 50 U.S.C. 3003 (e) Meetings (1) Frequency The Executive Committee shall hold meetings not less frequently than quarterly and as necessary to address particular issues. (2) Form The Executive Committee may hold meetings by videoconference. (f) Membership (1) In general The Executive Committee shall be composed of the following principal members: (A) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. (B) The Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (C) The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security. (D) The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. (E) The Commander of the United States Strategic Command. (F) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense. (G) Such other Federal officers or employees as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate, consistent with other authorities of the Department of Defense and publications of the Joint Staff, including the Charter for the Electronic Warfare Executive Committee, dated March 17, 2015. (g) Co-chairs of Executive Committee (1) In general The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment and the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, or their designees, shall serve as co-chairs of the Executive Committee. (2) Responsibilities of co-chairs The co-chairs of the Executive Committee shall— (A) preside at all Executive Committee meetings or have their designees preside at such meetings; (B) provide administrative control of the Executive Committee; (C) jointly guide the activities and actions of the Executive Committee; (D) approve all agendas for and summaries of meetings of the Executive Committee; (E) charter tailored working groups to conduct mission area analysis, as required, under subsection (i); and (F) perform such other duties as may be necessary to ensure the good order and functioning of the Executive Committee. (h) Electronic warfare capability team (1) In general There is within the Executive Committee an electronic warfare capability team, which shall— (A) serve as a flag officer level focus group and executive secretariat subordinate to the Executive Committee; and (B) in that capacity— (i) provide initial senior level coordination on key electronic warfare issues; (ii) prepare recommended courses of action to present to the Executive Committee; and (iii) perform other related duties. (2) Co-chairs The electronic warfare capability team shall be co-chaired by one representative from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment and one representative from the Force Structure, Resources, and Assessment Directorate of the Joint Staff (J–8). (3) Staff The principal members of the Executive Committee shall designate representatives from their respective staffs to the electronic warfare capability team. (i) Mission area working groups (1) In general The Executive Committee shall establish mission area working groups on a temporary basis— (A) to address specific issues and mission areas relating to electronic warfare and electromagnetic spectrum operations; (B) to involve subject matter experts and components of the Department of Defense with expertise in electronic warfare and electromagnetic spectrum operations; and (C) to perform other related duties. (2) Dissolution The Executive Committee shall dissolve a mission area working group established under paragraph (1) once the issue the working group was established to address is satisfactorily resolved. (j) Administration The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall administratively support the Executive Committee, including by designating not fewer than two officials of the Department of Defense to support the day-to-day operations of the Executive Committee. (k) Report to Congress Not later than February 28, 2024, and annually thereafter through 2030, the Executive Committee shall submit to the congressional defense committees a summary of activities of the Executive Committee during the preceding fiscal year. 500a. Guidance on the electronic warfare mission area and joint electromagnetic spectrum operations The Secretary of Defense shall— (1) establish processes and procedures to develop, integrate, and enhance the electronic warfare mission area and the conduct of joint electromagnetic spectrum operations in all domains across the Department of Defense; and (2) ensure that such processes and procedures provide for integrated defense-wide strategy, planning, and budgeting with respect to the conduct of such operations by the Department, including activities conducted to counter and deter such operations by malign actors. 500b. Annual report on electronic warfare strategy of the Department of Defense (a) In general At the same time as the President submits to Congress the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Secretary of each of the military departments, shall submit to the congressional defense committees an annual report on the electronic warfare strategy of the Department of Defense. (b) Contents of report Each report required under subsection (a) shall include each of the following: (1) A description and overview of— (A) the electronic warfare strategy of the Department of Defense; (B) how such strategy supports the National Defense Strategy; and (C) the organizational structure assigned to oversee the development of the Department's electronic warfare strategy, requirements, capabilities, programs, and projects. (2) A list of all the electronic warfare acquisition programs and research and development projects of the Department of Defense and a description of how each program or project supports the Department's electronic warfare strategy. (3) For each unclassified program or project on the list required by paragraph (2)— (A) the senior acquisition executive and organization responsible for oversight of the program or project; (B) whether or not validated requirements exist for the program or project and, if such requirements do exist, the date on which the requirements were validated and the organizational authority that validated such requirements; (C) the total amount of funding appropriated, obligated, and forecasted by fiscal year for the program or project, including the program element or procurement line number from which the program or project receives funding; (D) the development or procurement schedule for the program or project; (E) an assessment of the cost, schedule, and performance of the program or project as it relates to the program baseline for the program or project, as of the date of the submission of the report, and the original program baseline for such program or project, if such baselines are not the same; (F) the technology readiness level of each critical technology that is part of the program or project; (G) whether or not the program or project is redundant or overlaps with the efforts of another military department; and (H) the capability gap that the program or project is being developed or procured to fulfill. (4) A classified annex that contains the items described in subparagraphs (A) through (H) of paragraph (3) for each classified program or project on the list required by paragraph (2). 500c. Annual assessment of budget with respect to electronic warfare capabilities At the same time as the President submits to Congress the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an assessment by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation as to whether sufficient funds are requested in such budget for anticipated activities in such fiscal year for each of the following: (1) The development of an electromagnetic battle management capability for joint electromagnetic spectrum operations. (2) The establishment and operation of associated joint electromagnetic spectrum operations cells. 500d. Electromagnetic spectrum superiority implementation plan (a) In general The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall be responsible for oversight of the electromagnetic superiority implementation plan. (b) Report required Concurrent with the submission of the budget of the President to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029, the Chief Information Officer shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following with respect to the electromagnetic superiority implementation plan: (1) The implementation plan in effect as of the date of the report, noting any revisions from the preceding plan. (2) A statement of the elements of the implementation plan that have been achieved. (3) For each element that has been achieved, an assessment of whether the element is having its intended effect. (4) For any element that has not been achieved, an assessment of progress made in achieving the element, including a description of any obstacles that may hinder further progress. (5) For any element that has been removed from the implementation plan, a description of the reason for the removal of the element and an assessment of the impact of not pursuing achievement of the element. (6) Such additional matters as the Chief Information Officer considers appropriate. (c) Electromagnetic superiority implementation plan defined In this section, the term electromagnetic superiority implementation plan 500e. Electromagnetic Spectrum Enterprise Operational Lead for Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations (a) In general Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall establish an Electromagnetic Spectrum Enterprise Operational Lead for Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations (in this section referred to as the operational lead (b) Function The operational lead shall be responsible for synchronizing, assessing, and making recommendations to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff with respect to the readiness of the combatant commands to conduct joint electromagnetic spectrum operations. (c) Briefings required Concurrent with the submission of the budget of the President to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029, the Chairman, acting through the operational lead, shall brief to the congressional defense committees on the following: (1) Progress made in achieving full operational capability to conduct joint electromagnetic spectrum operations and any impediments to achieving such capability. (2) The readiness of the combatant commands to conduct such operations. (3) Recommendations for overcoming any deficiencies in the readiness of the combatant commands to conduct such operations and any material gaps contributing to such deficiencies. (4) Such other matters as the Chairman considers important to ensuring that the combatant commands are capable of conducting such operations. 500f. Evaluations of abilities of armed forces and combatant commands to perform electromagnetic spectrum operations missions (a) Evaluations of armed forces (1) In general Not later than October 1, 2024, and annually thereafter through 2029, the Chief of Staff of the Army, the Chief of Naval Operations, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, the Commandant of the Marine Corps, and the Chief of Space Operations shall each carry out an evaluation of the ability of the armed force concerned to perform electromagnetic spectrum operations missions required by each of the following: (A) The Electromagnetic Spectrum Superiority Strategy. (B) The Joint Staff-developed concept of operations for electromagnetic spectrum operations. (C) The operations and contingency plans of the combatant commands. (2) Certification required Not later than December 31 of each year in which evaluations are required under paragraph (1), each official specified in that paragraph shall certify to the congressional defense committees that the evaluation required to be carried out by that official has occurred. (3) Elements Each evaluation under paragraph (1) shall include an assessment of the following: (A) Current programs of record, including— (i) the ability of weapon systems to perform missions in contested electromagnetic spectrum environments; and (ii) the ability of electronic warfare capabilities to disrupt adversary operations. (B) Future programs of record, including— (i) the need for distributed or network-centric electronic warfare and signals intelligence capabilities; and (ii) the need for automated and machine learning- or artificial intelligence-assisted electronic warfare capabilities. (C) Order of battle. (D) Individual and unit training. (E) Tactics, techniques, and procedures, including— (i) maneuver, distribution of assets, and the use of decoys; and (ii) integration of non-kinetic and kinetic fires. (F) Other matters relevant to evaluating the ability of the armed force concerned to perform electromagnetic spectrum operations missions described in paragraph (1). (b) Evaluations of combatant commands (1) In general Not later than October 1, 2024, and annually thereafter through 2029, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, acting through the Electromagnetic Spectrum Enterprise Operational Lead for Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations established under section 500e (in this section referred to as the operational lead (A) The Electromagnetic Spectrum Superiority Strategy. (B) The Joint Staff-developed concept of operations for electromagnetic spectrum operations. (2) Elements Each evaluation under paragraph (1) shall include an assessment, as relevant, of the following: (A) Operation and contingency plans. (B) The manning, organizational alignment, and capability of joint electromagnetic spectrum operations cells. (C) Mission rehearsal and exercises. (D) Force positioning, posture, and readiness. (3) Briefing required Not later than December 31 of each year in which an evaluation is required under paragraph (A), the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, acting through the operational lead, shall brief the congressional defense committees on the results of the evaluation. . (b) Clerical amendment The tables of chapters at the beginning of subtitle A of title 10, United States Code, and at the beginning of part I of such subtitle, are each amended by inserting after the item relating to chapter 24 the following new item: 25. Electronic Warfare 500 . (c) Conforming repeal Section 1053 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 10 U.S.C. 113 1542. Study on the future of the Integrated Tactical Warning Attack Assessment System (a) In general The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development center— (1) to conduct a study on the future of the Integrated Tactical Warning Attack Assessment System (ITW/AA); and (2) to submit to the Chairman a report on the findings of the center with respect to the study conducted under paragraph (1). (b) Elements The study conducted pursuant to an agreement under subsection (a) shall cover the following: (1) Future air and missile threats to the United States. (2) The integration of multi-domain sensor data and their ground systems with the existing architecture of the Integrated Tactical Warning Attack Assessment System. (3) The effect of the integration described in paragraph (2) on the data reliability standards of the Integrated Tactical Warning Attack Assessment System. (4) Future data visualization, conferencing, and decisionmaking capabilities of such system. (5) Such other matters as the Chairman considers relevant to the study. (c) Report Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chairman shall submit to the congressional defense committees— (1) the report submitted to the Chairman under subsection (a)(2); and (2) the assessment of the Chairman with respect to the findings in such report and the recommendations of the Chairman with respect to modernizing the Integrated Tactical Warning Attack Assessment System. 1543. Comprehensive review of electronic warfare test ranges and future capabilities (a) In general The Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, in consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall conduct a comprehensive review of any deficiencies in the capacity of the electronic warfare test ranges and future electronic warfare capabilities of the Department of Defense relating to current and future global threats, research and development efforts, modeling, and electromagnetic and physical encroachment of the test ranges. (b) Elements The review required by subsection (a) shall consider the following: (1) Each electronic warfare test range, its size, any distinguishing features, and its electronic warfare capabilities. (2) The electronic warfare capabilities that are best practiced at which range and any encroachment issues between ranges. (3) Future electronic warfare capabilities and planned acquisitions. (4) Any modeling the Test Resource Management Center has done on incorporating future or planned electronic warfare capabilities into the current test ranges. (5) Any other matter the Under Secretary considers necessary. (c) Briefing required Not later than March 31, 2024, the Under Secretary shall provide the congressional defense committees with a briefing on the findings of the review required by subsection (a) that includes— (1) an assessment of any deficiency in the electronic warfare test ranges and future electronic warfare capabilities of the Department of Defense identified in the review; and (2) a plan to address any such deficiency in a timely manner. 1544. Extension of authorization for protection of certain facilities and assets from unmanned aircraft Section 130i(i) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 2023 2026 1545. Addressing serious deficiencies in electronic protection of systems that operate in the radio frequency spectrum (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall take such actions as the Secretary considers necessary and practicable— (1) to establish requirements for and assign sufficient priority to ensuring electronic protection of sensor, navigation, and communications systems and subsystems against jamming, spoofing, and unintended interference from military systems; and (2) to provide management oversight and supervision of the military departments to ensure electronic protection of military systems that emit and receive in radio frequencies against modern threats and interference from military systems operating in the same or adjacent radio frequency of Federal spectrum. (b) Specific required actions The Secretary shall require the military departments and combat support agencies to— (1) develop and approve requirements, through the Joint Requirements Oversight Council as appropriate, within 270 days of the date of the enactment of this Act, for every radar, signals intelligence, navigation, and communications system and subsystem subject to the Global Force Management process to be able to withstand threat-realistic levels of jamming, spoofing, and unintended interference, which includes self-generated interference; (2) test every system and subsystem described in paragraph (1) at a test range that permits threat-realistic electronic warfare attacks against the system or subsystem by a red team or opposition force at least once every 4 years, with the first set of highest priority systems to be initially tested no later than fiscal year 2025; (3) retrofit every system and subsystem described in paragraph (1) that fails to meet electronic protection requirements during testing with electronic protection measures that can withstand threat-realistic jamming, spoofing, and unintended interference within 3 years from the date of the testing, and to retest such systems and subsystems within 4 years of the initial failed test; (4) survey, identify, and test available technology that can be practically and affordably retro-fitted on the systems described in paragraph (1) and which provides robust protection against threat-realistic jamming, spoofing, and unintended interference; and (5) design and build electronic protection into ongoing and future development programs to withstand expected jamming and spoofing threats and unintended interference. (c) Waiver The Secretary may establish a process for issuing waivers on a case-by-case basis for the testing requirement established in paragraph (2) of subsection (b) and for the retrofit requirement established in paragraph (3) of such subsection. (d) Annual reports Each fiscal year, coinciding with the submission of the President’s budget request to Congress pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, through fiscal year 2030, the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall submit to the Electronic Warfare Executive Committee, the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate, and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a comprehensive annual report aggregating reporting from the military departments and combat support agencies that describes— (1) the implementation of the requirements of this section; (2) the systems subject to testing in the previous year and the results of such tests, including a description of the requirements for electronic protection established for the tested systems; and (3) each waiver issued in the previous year with respect to such requirements, together with a detailed rationale for the waiver and a plan for addressing the basis for the waiver request. 1546. Funding limitation on certain unreported programs (a) Limitation on availability of funds None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2024 may be obligated or expended, directly or indirectly, in part or in whole, for, on, in relation to, or in support of activities involving unidentified anomalous phenomena protected under any form of special access or restricted access limitations that have not been formally, officially, explicitly, and specifically described, explained, and justified to the appropriate committees of Congress, congressional leadership, and the Director, including for any activities relating to the following: (1) Recruiting, employing, training, equipping, and operations of, and providing security for, Government or contractor personnel with a primary, secondary, or contingency mission of capturing, recovering, and securing unidentified anomalous phenomena craft or pieces and components of such craft. (2) Analyzing such craft or pieces or components thereof, including for the purpose of determining properties, material composition, method of manufacture, origin, characteristics, usage and application, performance, operational modalities, or reverse engineering of such craft or component technology. (3) Managing and providing security for protecting activities and information relating to unidentified anomalous phenomena from disclosure or compromise. (4) Actions relating to reverse engineering or replicating unidentified anomalous phenomena technology or performance based on analysis of materials or sensor and observational information associated with unidentified anomalous phenomena. (5) The development of propulsion technology, or aerospace craft that uses propulsion technology, systems, or subsystems that is based on or derived from or inspired by inspection, analysis, or reverse engineering of recovered unidentified anomalous phenomena craft or materials. (6) Any aerospace craft that uses propulsion technology other than chemical propellants, solar power, and electric ion thrust. (b) Notification and reporting (1) In general Any person currently or formerly under contract with the Federal Government that has in their possession material or information provided by or derived from the Federal Government relating to unidentified anomalous phenomena that formerly or currently is protected by any form of special access or restricted access shall— (A) not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, notify the Director of such possession; and (B) not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, make available to the Director for assessment, analysis, and inspection— (i) all such material and information; and (ii) a comprehensive list of all non-earth origin or exotic unidentified anomalous phenomena materiel. (2) Protections The provision of notice and the making available of material and information under paragraph (1) shall be treated as an authorized disclosure under section 1673(b) of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( 50 U.S.C. 3373b (c) Limitation regarding independent research and development Consistent with Department of Defense Instruction Number 3204.01 (dated August 20, 2014, incorporating change 2, dated July 9, 2020; relating to Department policy for oversight of independent research and development), independent research and development funding relating to material or information described in subsection (a) shall not be allowable as indirect expenses for purposes of contracts covered by such instruction, unless such material and information is made available to the Director in accordance with subsection (b). (d) Notice to Congress Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Director has received a notification under subparagraph (A) of subsection (b)(1) or information or material under paragraph (B) of such subsection, the Director shall provide a written notification of such receipt to the appropriate committees of Congress and congressional leadership. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term appropriate committees of Congress (A) the Select Committee on Intelligence, the Committee on Armed Services, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and (B) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, the Committee on Armed Services, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. (2) The term congressional leadership (A) the majority leader of the Senate; (B) the minority leader of the Senate; (C) the Speaker of the House of Representatives; and (D) the minority leader of the House of Representatives. (3) The term Director (4) The term unidentified anomalous phenomena 50 U.S.C. 3373(n) Public Law 117–263 1547. Revision of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in commercial activities as security for intelligence collection activities (a) Extension of authority Section 431(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking December 31, 2023 December 31, 2025 (b) Interagency coordination and support Paragraph (1) of section 431(b) of such title is amended to read as follows: (1) be pre-coordinated with the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency using procedures mutually agreed upon by the Secretary of Defense and the Director, and, where appropriate, be supported by the Director; and . XVI Cyberspace-related matters A Matters relating to cyber operations and cyber forces 1601. Measures to enhance the readiness and effectiveness of the Cyber Mission Force (a) Personnel requirements and training for critical work roles The Secretary of Defense shall— (1) develop a plan to require— (A) a term of enlistment that is— (i) common across the military departments for critical work roles of the Cyber Mission Force; (ii) appropriate given the value of the training required for such work roles; and (iii) sufficient and extensive enough to meet the readiness requirements established by the Commander of United States Cyber Command; (B) tour lengths for personnel in the Cyber Mission Force that are— (i) common across the military departments; and (ii) sufficient and extensive enough to meet the readiness requirements established by the Commander of United States Cyber Command; (C) the military departments to present Cyber Mission Force personnel to the Commander of United States Cyber Command who are fully trained to the standards required by the work roles established by the Commander, including the critical work roles of the Cyber Mission Force, prior to their attachment or assignment to a unit of United States Cyber Command; (D) obligated service for members who receive the training contemplated in paragraph (C) which is commensurate with the significant financial and time investments made by the military service for the training received; and (E) facilitation of consecutive assignments at the same unit while not inhibiting the advancement or promotion potential of any member of the Armed Forces. (2) direct the Secretaries of the military departments to implement the plan developed under paragraph (1); and (3) establish curriculum and capacity within one or more military departments to train sufficient numbers of personnel from all of the military departments who can effectively perform the critical Cyber Mission Force work roles to achieve the readiness requirements established by the Commander of United States Cyber Command. (b) Pilot program on acquiring contract services for critical work roles (1) Pilot program required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commander of United States Cyber Command shall commence a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of acquiring the services of skilled personnel in the critical work roles of the Cyber Mission Force by contracting with one or more persons to enhance the readiness and effectiveness of the Cyber Mission Force. (2) Pilot program duration The Commander shall carry out the pilot program required by subsection paragraph (1) during the three-year period beginning on the date of the commencement of the pilot program and may, after such period— (A) continue carrying out such pilot program after such period for such duration as the Commander considers appropriate; or (B) transition such pilot program to a permanent program. (c) Plan on hiring, training, and retaining civilians to serve in critical work roles Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commander shall— (1) develop a plan to hire, train, and retain civilians to serve in the critical work roles of the Cyber Mission Force and other positions of the Cyber Mission Force to enhance the readiness and effectiveness of the Cyber Mission Force; and (2) provide the congressional defense committees a briefing on the plan developed under paragraph (1). (d) Definition of critical work roles of the Cyber Mission Force The term critical work roles of the Cyber Mission Force 1602. Cyber intelligence center (a) Establishment of capability required The Secretary of Defense shall establish a dedicated cyber intelligence capability to support the requirements of United States Cyber Command, the other combatant commands, the military departments, defense agencies, the Joint Staff, and the Office of the Secretary of Defense for foundational, scientific and technical, and all-source intelligence on cyber technology development, capabilities, concepts of operation, operations, and plans and intentions of cyber threat actors. (b) Establishment of center authorized (1) Authorization Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary may establish an all-source analysis center under the administration of the Defense Intelligence Agency to provide foundational intelligence for the capability established under subsection (a). (2) Limitation Information technology services for a center established under paragraph (1) may not be provided by the National Security Agency. (c) Resources (1) In general The Secretary shall direct and provide resources to the Commander of United States Cyber Command within the Military Intelligence Program to fund collection and analysis by the National Security Agency to meet the specific requirements established by the Commander for signals intelligence support. (2) Transfer of activities The Secretary may transfer the activities required under paragraph (1) to the National Intelligence Program if the Director of National Intelligence concurs and the transfer is specifically authorized in an intelligence authorization Act. (d) Briefing Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commander shall— (1) develop an estimate of the signals intelligence collection and analysis required of the National Security Agency and the cost of such collection and analysis; and (2) provide the congressional defense committees, the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives a briefing on the estimate developed under paragraph (1). 1603. Performance metrics for pilot program for sharing cyber capabilities and related information with foreign operational partners (a) In general The section 398 of title 10, United States Code (relating to pilot program for sharing cyber capabilities and related information with foreign operational partners), as added by section 1551(a) of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 (1) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (g) and (h), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f): (f) Performance metrics (1) The Secretary of Defense shall maintain performance metrics to track the results of sharing cyber capabilities and related information with foreign operational partners under a pilot program authorized by subsection (a). (2) The performance metrics under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) Who the cyber capability was used against. (B) The effect of the cyber capability, including whether and how the transfer of the cyber capability improved the operational cyber posture of the United States and achieved operational objectives of the United States, or had no effect. (C) Such other outcome-based or appropriate performance metrics as the Secretary considers appropriate for evaluating the effectiveness of a pilot program carried out under subsection (a). . (b) Technical correction Chapter 19 of such title is amended— (1) in the table of sections for such chapter by striking the item relating to such section 398 and inserting the following: 398a. Pilot program for sharing cyber capabilities and related information with foreign operational partners. ; and (2) by redesignating such section 398 as section 398a. 1604. Next generation cyber red teams (a) Development and submission of plans Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy shall direct the appropriate Assistant Secretary of Defense in the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, in consultation with the Principal Cyber Advisors of the military departments, to oversee the development and submission of a plan described in subsection (b) to the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E) and the Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) for assessment under subsection (c). (b) Plans described The plan described in this subsection is a plan— (1) to modernize cyber red teams ( CRTs (2) to establish joint service standards and metrics to ensure cyber red teams are adequately trained, staffed, and equipped to emulate advanced nation-state threats; and (3) to expand partnerships between the Department of Defense, particularly existing cyber red teams, and academia to expand the cyber talent workforce. (c) Assessment The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall, in coordination with the Director of the National Security Agency, review the plan submitted pursuant to subsection (a) and in doing so shall conduct an assessment of the plan with consideration of the following: (1) Opportunities for cyber red team operations to expand across the competition continuum, including during the cooperation and competition phases, strongly emphasizing pre-conflict preparation of the battlespace to better match adversary positioning and cyber activities, including operational security assessments to strengthen the ability of the Department to gain and maintain a tactical advantage. (2) The extent to which critical and emerging technologies and concepts such as artificial intelligence and machine learning enabled analysis and process automation can reduce the amount of person hours operators spend on maintenance and reporting to maximize research and training time. (3) Identification of training requirements, and changes to training, sustainment practices, or concepts of operation or employment that may be needed to ensure the effectiveness, suitability, and sustainability of the next generation of cyber red teams. (4) The extent to which additional resources or partnerships may be needed to remediate personnel shortfalls in cyber red teams, including funding for internship programs, hiring, and contracting. (d) Implementation Not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue such policies and guidance and prescribe such regulations as the Secretary determines necessary to carry out the plan required by subsection (a). (e) Annual reports Not later than January 31, 2025, and not less frequently than annually thereafter until January 31, 2031, the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall include in the annual report required by section 139(h) of title 10, United States Code, the following: (1) The findings of the Director with respect to the assessment carried out pursuant to subsection (c). (2) The results of test and evaluation events, including any resource and capability shortfalls limiting the ability of cyber red teams to meet operational requirements. (3) The extent to which operations of cyber red teams have expanded across the competition continuum, including during cooperation and competition phases, to match adversary positioning and cyber activities. (4) A summary of identified categories of common gaps and shortfalls across military department and Defense Agency cyber red teams. (5) Any identified lessons learned that would affect training or operational employment decisions relating to cyber red teams. 1605. Management of data assets by Chief Digital Officer (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall, acting through the Chief Data and Artificial Intelligence Officer of the Department of Defense (CDAO), provide data assets and data analytics capabilities necessary for understanding the global cyber-social terrain to support the planning and execution of defensive and offensive information operations, defensive and offensive cyber operations, indications and warning of adversary military activities and operations, and calibration of actions and reactions in great power competition. (b) Responsibilities of chief data and artificial intelligence officer The Chief Data and Artificial Intelligence Officer shall— (1) develop a baseline of data assets maintained by all defense intelligence agencies, military departments, combatant commands, and any other components of the Department; and (2) develop and oversee the implementation of plans to enhance data assets that are essential to support the purposes set forth in subsection (a). (c) Other matters The Chief Data and Artificial Intelligence Officer shall— (1) designate or establish one or more executive agents for enhancing data assets and the acquisition of data analytic tools for users; (2) ensure that data assets in the possession of a component of the Department are accessible for the purposes described in subsection (a); and (3) ensure that advanced analytics, including artificial intelligence technology, are developed and applied to the analysis of data assets in support of the purposes described in subsection (a). (d) Semiannual briefings Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and not less frequently semiannually thereafter, the Chief Data and Artificial Intelligence Officer shall provide the congressional defense committees, the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives a briefing on the implementation of this section. (e) Prior approval reprogramming After the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary may transfer funds to begin implementation of this section, subject to established limitations and approval procedures. 1606. Authority for countering illegal trafficking by Mexican transnational criminal organizations in cyberspace (a) Authority (1) In general In accordance with sections 124 and 394 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense may, in coordination with other relevant Federal departments and agencies and in consultation with the Government of Mexico as appropriate, conduct detection, monitoring, and other operations in cyberspace to counter Mexican transnational criminal organizations that are engaged in any of the following activities that cross the southern border of the United States: (A) Smuggling of illegal drugs, controlled substances, or precursors thereof. (B) Human trafficking. (C) Weapons trafficking. (D) Other illegal activities. (2) Certain entities The authority provided by paragraph (1) may be used to counter Mexican transnational criminal organizations, including entities cited in the most recent National Drug Threat Assessment published by the United States Drug Enforcement Administration, that are engaged in the activities described in (1). (b) Cyber strategy for countering illegal trafficking by transnational criminal organizations affecting the security of United States southern border (1) Strategy required Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall, in consultation with the National Cyber Director and the heads of such other Federal departments and agencies as the Secretary considers appropriate, submit to the appropriate congressional committees a strategy for conducting operations in cyberspace under subsection (a). (2) Elements The strategy submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A description of the cyberspace presence and activities, including any information operations, of the entities described under subsection (a)(2) pose to the national security of the United States. (B) A description of any previous actions taken by the Department of Defense to conduct operations in cyberspace to counter illegal activities by transnational criminal organizations, and a description of those actions. (C) An assessment of the financial, technological, and personnel resources that the Secretary can deploy to exercise the authority provided in subsection (a) to counter illegal trafficking by transnational criminal organizations. (D) Recommendations, if any, for additional authorities as may be required to enhance the exercise of the authority provided in subsection (a). (E) A description of the extent to which the Secretary has worked, or intends to work, with the Government of Mexico, interagency partners, and the private sector to enable operations in cyberspace against illegal trafficking by transnational criminal organizations. (F) A description of the security cooperation programs in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act that would enable the Secretary to cooperate with Mexican defense partners against illegal trafficking by transnational criminal organizations in cyberspace. (G) An assessment of the potential risks associated with cooperating with Mexican counterparts against transnational criminal organizations in cyberspace and ways that those risks can be mitigated, including in cooperation with Mexican partners. (H) A description of any cooperation agreements or initiatives in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act with interagency partners and the government of Mexico to counter transnational criminal organizations in cyberspace. (c) Quarterly monitoring briefing The Secretary shall, on a quarterly basis in conjunction with the briefings required by section 484 of title 10, United States Code, provide to the appropriate congressional committees a briefing setting forth, for the preceding calendar quarter, the following: (1) Each country in which an operation was conducted under subsection (a). (2) The purpose and nature of each operation set forth pursuant to paragraph (1). (3) The start date and end date or expected duration of each operation set forth pursuant to paragraph (1). (4) The elements of the Department of Defense down to O–6 command level who conducted or are conducting the operations set forth pursuant to paragraph (1). (d) Rule of construction Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede any standing prohibitions on collection of information on United States persons. 1607. Pilot program for cybersecurity collaboration center inclusion of semiconductor manufacturers (a) Establishment of pilot program The Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Director of the National Security Agency, establish a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of improving the semiconductor manufacturing supply chain by enabling the National Security Agency Cybersecurity Collaboration Center to collaborate with semiconductor manufacturers in the United States. (b) Program scope The pilot program established pursuant to subsection (a) shall focus on improving the cybersecurity of the supply chain for semiconductor design and manufacturing, including the following: (1) The cybersecurity of design and manufacturing processes, as well as assembly, packaging, and testing. (2) Protecting against cyber-driven intellectual property theft. (3) Reducing the risk of supply chain disruptions caused by cyberattacks. (c) Eligibility Persons who directly support the manufacture, packaging, and assembly of semiconductors within the United States and who provide semiconductor components for the Department of Defense, national security systems (as defined in section 3552(b) of title 44, United States Code), or the defense industrial base are eligible to participate in the pilot program. (d) Briefings (1) Initial (A) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide the appropriate committees of Congress a briefing on the pilot program required under subsection (a). (B) Elements The briefing required under subparagraph (A) shall include the following: (i) The plans of the Secretary for the implementation of the pilot program. (ii) Identification of key priorities for the pilot program. (iii) Identification of any potential challenges in standing up the pilot program or impediments to semiconductor manufacturer or semiconductor component supplier participation in the pilot program. (2) Annual (A) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter for the duration of the pilot program required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall provide the appropriate committees of Congress a briefing on the progress of the pilot program. (B) Elements Each briefing required under subparagraph (A) shall include the following: (i) Recommendations for addressing relevant policy, budgetary, security, and legislative gaps to increase the effectiveness of the pilot program. For the first annual briefing, this shall include an assessment of the resources necessary for the pilot to be successful. (ii) Recommendations for increasing semiconductor manufacturer or semiconductor component supplier participation in the pilot program. (iii) A description of the challenges encountered in carrying out the pilot program, including any concerns expressed by semiconductor manufacturers or semiconductor component supplier. (iv) The findings of the Secretary with respect to the feasibility and advisability of extending or expanding the pilot program. (v) Such other matters as the Secretary considers appropriate. (e) Termination The pilot program required by subsection (a) shall terminate on the date that is four years after the date of the enactment of this Act. (f) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees (1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 1608. Independent evaluation regarding potential establishment of United States Cyber Force and further evolution of current model for management and execution of cyber mission (a) Agreement (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Public Administration (in this section referred to as the National Academy (2) Timing The Secretary shall seek to enter into the agreement described in paragraph (1) by not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (b) Evaluation (1) In general Under an agreement between the Secretary and the National Academy entered into pursuant to subsection (a), the National Academy shall conduct an evaluation regarding the advisability of— (A) establishing a separate Armed Force dedicated to operations in the cyber domain (in this section referred to as the United States Cyber Force (B) refining and further evolving the current organization approach, which is based on the Special Operations Command model for United States Cyber Command. (2) Scope The evaluation conducted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include consideration of— (A) the potential establishment of a United States Cyber Force as a separate Armed Force commensurate with the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Space Force, for the purpose of organizing, training, and equipping the personnel required to enable and conduct operations in the cyber domain through positions aligned to the United States Cyber Command and the other unified combatant commands; (B) a United States Cyber Force able to devise and implement recruiting and retention policies and standards specific to the range of skills and career fields required to enable and conduct cyberspace operations, as determined by the United States Cyber Command and the other unified combatant commands; (C) the performance and efficacy of the Armed Forces to date, and potential improvements thereto from extending the model described in paragraph (1)(B), in satisfying the requirements of the combatant commands to enable and conduct operations in the cyber domain through positions aligned to the United States Cyber Command and other unified combatant commands, and any expected differences in that performance based on the creation of a United States Cyber Force as compared to evolutionary modifications to the current model; (D) the performance and efficacy of the Armed Forces to date, and potential improvements thereto from extending the model described in paragraph (1)(B), in devising and implementing recruitment and retention policies specific to the range of skills and career fields required to enable and conduct cyberspace operations, as determined by the United States Cyber Command and the other unified combatant commands, and any expected differences in that performance based on the creation of a United States Cyber Force as compared to evolutionary modifications to the current model; (E) potential and recommended delineations of responsibility between the other Armed Forces and a United States Cyber Force and an enhanced model described in paragraph (1)(B) with respect to network management, resourcing, and operations; (F) potential and recommended delineations of responsibility between the other Armed Forces and a United States Cyber Force and an enhancement of the model described in paragraph (1)(B) for United States Cyber Command with respect to organizing, training, and equipping members of the Cyberspace Operations Forces, not serving in positions aligned under the Cyber Mission Force, to the extent necessary to support network management and operations; (G) views and perspectives of members of the Armed Forces, in each grade, serving in the Cyber Mission Force with experience in operational work roles (as defined by the Commander of the United States Cyber Command), and military and civilian leaders across the Department regarding the establishment of a Cyber Force and a further evolution of the model described in paragraph (1)(B) for United States Cyber Command; (H) the extent to which each of the other Armed Forces is formed towards, and organized around, operations within a given warfighting domain, and the potential applicability of such formation and organizing constructs to a United States Cyber Force with respect to the cyber domain; (I) findings from previous relevant assessments, analyses, and studies conducted by the Secretary, the Comptroller General of the United States, or other entities determined relevant by the National Academy on the establishment of a United States Cyber Force and a further evolution of the model described in paragraph (1)(B) for United States Cyber Command; (J) the organizing constructs for effective and operationally mature cyber forces of foreign countries and the relevance of such constructs to the potential creation of a United States Cyber Force and a further evolution of the model described in paragraph (1)(B) for United States Cyber Command; (K) lessons learned from the creation of the United States Space Force that should be applied to the creation of a United States Cyber Force; (L) recommendations for approaches to the creation of a United States Cyber Force and the further evolution of the model described in paragraph (1)(B) for United States Cyber Command that would minimize disruptions to Department of Defense cyber operations; (M) the histories of the Armed Forces, including an analysis of the conditions that preceded the establishment of each new Armed Force established since 1900; and (N) a comparison between the potential service secretariat leadership structures for a United States Cyber Force and the further evolution of the model described in paragraph (1) for United States Cyber Command, including establishing the United States Cyber Force within an existing military department, standing up a new military department, and evolving the service secretary-like function of the Principal Cyber Advisor in the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. (3) Considerations The evaluation conducted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include an evaluation of how a potential United States Cyber Force dedicated to the cyber domain would compare in performance and efficacy to the current model and a further evolution of the model described in paragraph (1)(B) for United States Cyber Command, with respect to the following functions and potential objective end states, as well as an evaluation of the importance of the functions and potential end states: (A) Organizing, training, and equipping the size of a force necessary to satisfy existing and projected requirements of the Department of Defense. (B) Harmonizing training requirements and programs in support of cyberspace operations. (C) Recruiting and retaining qualified officers and enlisted members of the Armed Forces at the levels necessary to execute cyberspace operations. (D) Using reserve component forces in support of cyberspace operations. (E) Sustaining persistent force readiness. (F) Generating foundational intelligence in support of cyberspace operations. (G) Acquiring and providing cyber capabilities in support of cyberspace operations. (H) Establishing pay parity among members of the Armed Forces serving in and qualified for work roles in support of cyberspace operations. (I) Establishing pay parity among civilians serving in and qualified for work roles in support of cyberspace operations. (J) Establishing advancement parity for members of the Armed Forces serving in and qualified for work roles in support of cyberspace operations. (K) Establishing advancement parity for civilians serving in and qualified for work roles in support of cyberspace operations. (L) Developing professional military education content and curricula focused on the cyber domain. (c) Support from federally funded research and development center (1) In general Upon a request from the National Academy, the Secretary shall seek to enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development center described in paragraph (2) under which such federally funded research and development center shall support the National Academy in conducting the evaluation under subsection (b). (2) Federally funded research and development center described A federally funded research and development center described in this paragraph is a federally funded research and development center the staff of which includes subject matter experts with appropriate security clearances and expertise in— (A) cyber warfare; (B) personnel management; (C) military training processes; and (D) acquisition management. (d) Access to Department of Defense personnel, information, and resources Under an agreement entered into between the Secretary and the National Academies under subsection (a)— (1) the Secretary shall agree to provide to the National Academy access to such personnel, information, and resources of the Department of Defense as may be determined necessary by the National Academy in furtherance of the conduct of the evaluation under subsection (b); and (2) if the Secretary does not provide such access, or any other major obstacle to such access occurs, the National Academy shall agree to notify the congressional defense committees not later than seven days after the date of such refusal or other occurrence. (e) Report (1) Submission to Congress Under an agreement entered into between the Secretary and the National Academy under subsection (a), the National Academy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the findings of the National Academy with respect to the evaluation under subsection (b) not later than 210 days after the date of the execution of the agreement. (2) Prohibition against interference No personnel of the Department of Defense, nor any other officer or employee of the United States Government, may interfere, exert undue influence, or in any way seek to alter the findings of the National Academy specified in paragraph (1) prior to the submission thereof under such paragraph. (3) Form The report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in an unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. B Matters relating to Department of Defense cybersecurity and information technology 1611. Requirements for deployment of fifth generation information and communications capabilities to Department of Defense bases and facilities (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall— (1) develop and implement a strategy for deploying private networks, based on fifth generation information and communications capabilities (5G) and Open Radio Access Network (ORAN) architecture, to military bases and facilities that are tailored to the specific mission, security, and performance requirements of those bases and facilities; (2) create a common, transparent, and streamlined process for enabling public network service providers of fifth generation information and communications capabilities to gain access to military bases and facilities to provide commercial subscriber services to government and contractor personnel and organizations located on those bases and facilities; and (3) decide, on a case-by-case basis or as a common requirement, whether to contract for— (A) neutral hosting, whereby infrastructure and services will be provided to companies deploying private networks and public network services through Multi-Operator Core Network architectures; or (B) separate private network and public network infrastructure. (b) International cooperation activities The Secretary may engage in cooperation activities with foreign allies and partners of the United States, using an authority provided by another provision of law, to inform the efficient and effective deployment of Open Radio Access Network architecture and to implement the strategy required under subsection (a)(1). (c) Due date for strategy and briefing (1) Strategy The Secretary shall develop the strategy required in subsection (a)(1) not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (2) Briefing Not later than 150 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the strategy developed under paragraph (1) of subsection (a) and the activities of the Secretary under such subsection. (d) Definition of Open Radio Access Network The term Open Radio Access Network 1612. Department of Defense information network boundary and cross-domain defense (a) Modernization program required The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a modernization program for network boundary and cross-domain defense against cyber attacks, expanding upon the fiscal year 2023 pilot program and initial deployment to the primary Department of Defense internet access points (IAPs) managed by the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA). (b) Program phases (1) In general The modernization program required by subsection (a) shall be implemented in phases, with the objective of completing the program by October 1, 2028. (2) Objectives The phases required by paragraph (1) shall include the following objectives: (A) By the end of fiscal year 2026, completion of— (i) a pilot of modernized boundary defense capabilities and initial and full deployment of the capabilities to internet access points managed by the Defense Information Systems Agency; and (ii) the extension of modernized boundary defense capabilities to all additional internet access points of the Department of Defense information network (DODIN). (B) By the end of fiscal year 2027, survey, pilot, and deploy modernized boundary defense capabilities to the access points and cross-domain capabilities of the Secret Internet Protocol Network. (C) By the end of fiscal year 2028, survey, pilot, and deploy modernized boundary defense capabilities to remaining classified networks and enclaves of the Department information network. (c) Briefing required Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide the congressional defense committees a briefing on— (1) the findings of the Secretary with respect to the pilot and initial deployment under subsection (b)(2)(A)(i); and (2) the plans of the Secretary for the phased deployment to other internet access points and classified networks pursuant to subsection (b). 1613. Policy and guidance on memory-safe software programming (a) Policy and guidance Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a Department of Defense-wide policy and guidance in the form of a directive memorandum to implement the recommendations of the National Security Agency contained in the Software Memory Safety Cybersecurity Information Sheet published by the Agency in November, 2022, regarding memory-safe software programming languages and testing to identify memory-related vulnerabilities in software developed, acquired by, and used by the Department of Defense. (b) Requirements The policy required in subsection (a) shall— (1) establish the conditions and associated approval processes under which a component of the Department may— (A) contract for the development of custom software that includes open source and reused software written in programming languages that are not classified as memory-safe by the Agency; (B) acquire commercial software items that use programming languages that are not classified as memory-safe by the Agency; (C) contract for software-as-a-service where the contractor uses programming languages that are not classified as memory-safe by the Agency; and (D) develop software in Federal Government-owned software factories programming languages that are not classified as memory-safe by the Agency; and (2) establish requirements and processes for employing static and dynamic application security testing that can identify memory-use issues and vulnerabilities and resolve them for software contracted for, developed, or acquired as described in paragraph (1). (c) Briefing required Not later than 300 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide the congressional defense committees a briefing on the policy and guidance developed under subsection (a). 1614. Development of regional cybersecurity strategies (a) Development of strategies required Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Commander of United States Cyber Command and each commander of a geographic combatant command, develop, for each geographic combatant command, a regional cybersecurity strategy to support the operations of such command. (b) Elements Each regional cybersecurity strategy developed under subsection (a) for a geographic combatant command shall include the following: (1) A description or an outline of methods to identify both nation-state and non-state cyber threat actors. (2) Processes to enhance the targeting, intelligence, and cyber capabilities of the combatant command. (3) Plans to increase the number of cyber planners embedded in the combatant command. (4) Processes to integrate cyber forces into other warfare domains. (5) A plan to assist, train, advise, and participate in cyber capacity building with international partners. (6) A prioritization of cyber risks and vulnerabilities within the geographic region. (7) Processes to coordinate cyber activities with interagency partners with activities in the geographic region. (8) Specific plans to assist in the defense of foreign infrastructure that is critical to the national security interests of the United States. (9) Means by which the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency will be integrated into each strategy. 1615. Cyber incident reporting (a) Cyber incident reporting requirement (1) Department governance Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, the Commander of United States Cyber Command, and the Commander of the Joint Force Headquarters Department of Defense Information Network— (A) assign responsibility to the Commander of the Joint Force Headquarters Department of Defense Information Network to oversee cyber incident reporting and notification of cyber incidents to Department leadership; (B) align policy and system requirements to enable the Department to have enterprise-wide visibility of cyber incident reporting to support rapid and appropriate response; and (C) distribute new guidance to Department personnel on cyber incident reporting, which shall include detailed procedures for identifying, reporting, and notifying Department leadership of critical cyber incidents. (2) Defense industrial base Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall ensure that the Chief Information Officer determines what actions need to be taken to encourage more complete and timely mandatory cyber incident reporting from persons in the defense industrial base. (3) Data breach notification The Secretary shall ensure that components of the Department document instances in which Department personnel affected by a privacy data breach are notified of the breach within 72 hours of the discovery of the breach. (b) Assessment on establishing office of cyber statistics (1) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall complete an assessment of the feasibility and suitability of establishing, and resourcing required to establish, an office of cyber statistics to track cyber incidents and measure the response time of defense agencies and the military departments to address cyber threats, risks, and vulnerabilities. (2) Elements The assessment required under paragraph (1) shall include an evaluation of the feasibility, suitability, and resourcing required for defense agencies and the military departments— (A) to collect data on the amount of time it takes to detect a cyber incident; (B) to respond to a cyber incident; (C) to fully mitigate the risk of high-impact cyber vulnerabilities; (D) to recover data following a malicious cyber intrusion; and (E) to collect such other metrics as the Secretary determines would help improve cyber incident reporting practices. 1616. Management by Department of Defense of mobile applications (a) Implementation of recommendations (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall evaluate and implement to the maximum practicable extent the recommendations of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense with respect to managing mobile applications contained in the report set forth by the Inspector General dated February 9, 2023, and entitled Management Advisory: The DoD's Use of Mobile Applications (2) Deadline The Secretary shall implement the recommendations specified in subsection (a) by not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, unless the Secretary notifies the congressional defense committees in writing of specific recommendations that the Secretary chooses not to implement or to implement after the date that is one year after the date of the enactment of this Act. (b) Briefing on requirements related to covered applications (1) In general Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall brief the congressional defense committees on actions taken by the Secretary to enforce compliance with existing policy of the Department of Defense that prohibits— (A) the installation and use of covered applications on Federal Government devices; and (B) the use of covered applications on the Department of Defense Information Network on personal devices. (2) Covered applications defined In this subsection, the term covered applications 1617. Security enhancements for the nuclear command, control, and communications network (a) Required establishment of cross-functional team (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a cross-functional team, in accordance with section 911(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 10 U.S.C. 111 NC3 (2) Participation in the cross-functional team The Secretary shall ensure that each of the military departments, the Defense Information Systems Agency, the National Security Agency, United States Cyber Command, and the Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications Enterprise Center of United States Strategic Command provide staff for the cross-functional team. (3) Scope The cross-functional team shall work to enhance the cyber defense of the nuclear command, control, and communications network during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on October 31, 2028, or a subsequent date as the Secretary may determine. (b) Required construct and plan of action and milestones Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the head of the cross-functional team established pursuant to subsection (a)(1) shall develop a cyber defense construct and associated plans of actions and milestones to enhance the security of the systems and networks that support the nuclear command, control, and communications mission that are based on— (1) the application of the principles of the Zero Trust Architecture approach to security; (2) analysis of appropriately comprehensive endpoint and network telemetry data; and (3) control capabilities enabling rapid investigation and remediation of indicators of compromise and threats to mission execution. (c) Annual briefings During the 60-day period beginning on the date that is 30 days before the date on which the President submits to Congress the budget of the President for fiscal year 2025 pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, and for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2028, the Secretary shall provide the congressional defense committees a briefing on the implementation of this section. 1618. Guidance regarding securing laboratories of the Armed Forces (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer of the Department, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, and the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, issue guidance throughout the Department regarding methods and processes to secure laboratories of the Armed Forces from— (1) unauthorized access and intrusion; (2) damage to, and destruction, manipulation, or theft of, physical and digital laboratory assets; (3) accidental or intentional release or disclosure of sensitive information; and (4) cyber sabotage. (b) Methods and processes At a minimum, the methods and processes required under subsection (a) shall include guidance to— (1) secure laboratory operations through zero trust principles; (2) control access of devices to laboratory information networks; (3) secure inventory management processes; (4) control or limit access to laboratories of the Armed Forces to authorized individuals; (5) maintain the security and integrity of data libraries, repositories, and other digital assets; (6) report and remediate cyber incidents or other unauthorized intrusions; (7) train and educate personnel of the Department on laboratory security; (8) develop an operations security (OPSEC) plan to secure laboratory operations that can be used to implement the appropriate countermeasures given the mission, assessed risk, and resources available to the unit and provides guidelines for implementation of routine procedures and measures to be employed during daily operations or activities of the unit; and (9) develop and train applicable units on individualized secure laboratory critical information and indicator lists to aid in protecting critical information about Department activities, intentions, capabilities, or limitations that an adversary seeks to gain a military, political, diplomatic, economic, or technological advantage. 1619. Establishing Identity, Credential, and Access Management initiative as a program of record (a) In general Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish the Identity, Credential, and Access Management (ICAM) initiative as a program of record subject to milestone reviews, compliance with requirements, and operational testing. (b) Elements The program of record established pursuant to subsection (a) shall encompass, at a minimum, the following: (1) Correcting the authentication and credentialing security weaknesses, including in the Public Key Infrastructure program, identified by the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation in a report submitted to Congress in April, 2023, entitled FY14-21 Observations of the Compromise of Cyber Credentials (2) Implementing improved authentication technologies, such as biometric and behavioral authentication techniques and other non-password-based solutions. (c) Briefing Not later than 150 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide the congressional defense committees a briefing on the parameters of the program of record established pursuant to subsection (a). 1620. Strategy on cybersecurity resiliency of Department of Defense space enterprise (a) Strategy Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, the Commander of United States Cyber Command, the Secretary of the Air Force, and the Commander of United States Space Command, develop and commence implementation of a Department-wide strategy regarding cyber protection activities for the Department of Defense space enterprise. (b) Elements The strategy developed and implemented pursuant to subsection (a) shall, at a minimum, address the following elements: (1) The coordination and synchronization of cyber protection activities across combatant commands, the military departments, and defense agencies. (2) The adoption and implementation of zero trust architecture on legacy and new space-based systems. (3) How the Department will prioritize the mitigation of known cyber risks and vulnerabilities to legacy and new space-based systems. (4) How the Department will accelerate the development of capabilities to protect space-based systems from cyber threats. (c) Briefing Not later than 150 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide the congressional defense committees a briefing on the strategy developed and implemented pursuant to subsection (a). 1621. Requirements for implementation of user activity monitoring for cleared personnel and operational and information technology administrators and other privileged users (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall require each head of a component of the Department of Defense to fully implement directives, policies, and program requirements for user activity monitoring and least privilege access controls for Federal Government and contractor personnel granted access to classified information and classified networks. (b) Specific user activity control requirements The Secretary shall require each head of a Department component to fully implement the detection, collection, and auditing of the following: (1) Sent and received emails, including sent attachments and emails sent outside of Federal Government domains. (2) Screen captures and print jobs, with focused attention on unusual volumes and times. (3) Accesses to World Wide Web Uniform Resource Locators and uploads and downloads involving nongovernment domains. (4) All instances in which a user creates, copies, moves to, or renames a file on removable media. (5) Secure file transfers, including on nonstandard ports. (6) Keystrokes. (7) Unauthorized research on user activity monitoring agents and techniques to disable user activity monitoring agents. (8) Attempts to clear event logs on devices. (9) Unauthorized applications being installed or run on an endpoint. (10) Installation and use of mounted drives, including serial numbers of such drives. (11) Initiation and control of an interactive session on a remote computer or virtual machine. (12) Instances where monitored users are denied access to a network location or resource. (13) Users uploading to or downloading from cloud services. (14) Administrative actions by privileged users, including remote and after-hour administrative actions, as well as document viewing, copy and paste activity, and file copying to new locations. (c) Additional requirements The Secretary shall require each head of a Department component to implement the following: (1) Automated controls to prohibit privileged user accounts from performing general user activities not requiring privileged access. (2) Two-person control whereby privileged users attempt to initiate data transfers from a classified domain and removable media-based data transfer activities on classified networks. (d) Establishing user activity monitoring behavior thresholds (1) In general The Secretary shall require each head of a Department component to implement standard triggers, alerts, and controls developed by the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security based on insider threat behavior models approved by the Under Secretary. (2) Approval of deviations A head of a Department component that seeks to adopt a practice pursuant to paragraph (1) that deviates from standard triggers, alerts, and controls described in such paragraph by being less stringent shall submit to the Under Secretary a request for approval for such deviation along with a written justification for such deviation. (e) Periodic testing The Secretary shall require each head of a Department component, not less frequently than once every two years— (1) to conduct insider threat testing using threat-realistic tactics, techniques, and procedures; and (2) to submit to the Under Secretary and the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation a report on the findings of the head with respect to the testing conducted pursuant to paragraph (1). (f) Periodic reviews and updates The Secretary shall review and update the standard set of triggers, alerts, and controls described in subsection (d)(1) at least once every three years to account for new technology, new insider threat behaviors, and the results of testing conducted pursuant to subsection (e)(1). (g) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives a report on the implementation of the requirements of this section. (h) Definition of triggers In this section, the term trigger 1622. Department of Defense digital content provenance (a) Briefing (1) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Defense Media Activity (DMA) shall provide a to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a briefing on developing a course of education at the Defense Information School (DINFOS) to teach the practical concepts and skills needed by Department of Defense public affairs, audiovisual, visual information, and records management specialists. (2) Elements The briefing provided pursuant to paragraph (1) shall cover the following: (A) The expertise and qualifications of the Department personnel who will be responsible for teaching the proposed course of education. (B) The list of sources that will be consulted and used to develop the proposed curriculum for the course of education. (C) A description of the industry open technical standards under subsection (b)(1)(C). (D) The status of the implementation of the course of education. (b) Course of education required (1) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Defense Media Activity shall establish a course of education at the Defense Information School to teach the practical concepts and skills needed by public affairs, audiovisual, visual information, and records management specialists to understand the following: (A) Digital content provenance for applicable Department media content. (B) The challenges posed to Department missions and operations by a digital content forgery. (C) How existing industry open technical standards may be used to authenticate the digital content provenance of applicable Department media content. (2) Matters covered The course of education established pursuant to paragraph (1) shall cover the following: (A) The challenges to Department missions and operations posed by a digital content forgery. (B) The development of industry open technical standards for verifying the digital content provenance of applicable Department media content. (C) Hands-on training techniques for capturing secure and authenticated digital content for documenting and communicating Department themes and messages. (D) Training for completing post-production tasks by using industry open technical standards for digital content provenance and transmitting applicable Department media content in both operational and nonoperational environments. (E) Such other matters as the Director considers appropriate. (3) Report Not later than one year after the date of the establishment of the course required in paragraph (1), the Director shall provide the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the following: (A) The status of the development of a curriculum to carry out the course of education required by paragraph (1). (B) The implementation plan of the Director for such course of education, including the following: (i) The expertise and qualifications of the Department personnel responsible for teaching the course of education. (ii) The list of sources consulted and used to develop the curriculum for the course of education. (iii) A description of the industry open technical standards under subsection (b)(1)(C). (iv) The status of the implementation of the course of education. (C) The resources available to the Director to carry out this subsection and whether the Director requires any additional resources to carry out this subsection. (c) Pilot program on implementing digital content provenance standards (1) Pilot program required Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall commence a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of implementing industry open technical standards for digital content provenance for official Department photographic and video visual documentation that is publicly released by the Defense Visual Information Distribution Service (DVIDS) and other distribution platforms, systems, and services used by the Department. (2) Elements In carrying out the pilot program required by paragraph (1), the Director shall— (A) establish a process for using industry open technical standards for verifying the digital content provenance of applicable Department media content; (B) apply technology solutions on photographs and videos of the Department publicly released after the date of the enactment of this section, that comport with industry open technical standard for digital content provenance; (C) assess the feasibility and advisability of applying an industry open technical standard for digital content provenance on historical visual information records of the Department stored at the Defense Visual Information Records Center; and (D) develop and apply measure of effectiveness for the execution of the pilot program. (3) Consultation In carrying out the pilot program required by paragraph (1), the Director may consult with federally funded research and development centers, private industry, academia, and such others as the Director considers appropriate. (4) Termination The pilot program carried out pursuant to paragraph (1) shall terminate on January 1, 2027. (5) Report (A) In general Not later than January 1, 2026, the Director shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the pilot program. (B) Contents The report submitted pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall include the following: (i) The findings of the Director with respect to the pilot program. (ii) The names of all entities the Director consulted with in carrying out the pilot program as authorized under paragraph (3). (iii) Assessment of the effectiveness of the pilot. (iv) A recommendation as to whether the pilot program should be made permanent. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) The term applicable Department media content (2) The term digital content forgery (3) The term digital content provenance 1623. Post-graduate employment of Cyber Service Academy scholarship recipients in intelligence community Section 1535 of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 10 U.S.C. 2200 (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting , the heads of the elements of the intelligence community, the Secretary of Homeland Security (B) in paragraph (3), by striking Department of Defense Cyber and Digital Service Academy Cyber Service Academy (2) in subsection (d), by inserting or an element of the intelligence community missions of the Department (3) in subsection (e)— (A) by striking Secretary head concerned (B) by inserting , or within an element of the intelligence community, as the case may be United States Code (4) in subsections (h), (j), and (k), by striking Secretary head concerned (5) by adding at the end of the following new subsections: (p) Interagency considerations (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall enter into an agreement with the head of an element of the intelligence community to allow a scholarship recipient to satisfy the recipient's post-award employment obligations under this section by working for an element of the intelligence community that is not part of the Department of Defense if the head of that element agrees to reimburse the Department of Defense for the scholarship program costs associated with that scholarship recipient. (2) Limitations (A) A scholarship recipient may not serve the recipient's post-award employment obligation under this section at an element of the intelligence community that is not part of the Department of Defense before an agreement under paragraph (1) is reached. (B) Not more than 10 percent of scholarship recipients in each class may be placed in positions outside the Department of Defense unless the Secretary certifies that the Department of Defense cannot facilitate a placement within the Department of Defense. (q) Definitions In this section: (1) The term head concerned (A) The Secretary of Defense, with respect to matters concerning the Department of Defense; or (B) the head of an element of the intelligence community, with respect to matters concerning that element. (2) The term intelligence community 50 U.S.C. 3003 . 1624. Minimum number of scholarships to be awarded annually through Cyber Service Academy Section 1535(c) of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 10 U.S.C. 2200 (5) Minimum number of scholarship awards (A) In general The Secretary of Defense shall award not fewer than 1,000 scholarships through the Program in fiscal year 2026 and in each fiscal year thereafter. (B) Waiver The Secretary of Defense may award fewer than the number of scholarships required under subparagraph (A) in a fiscal year if the Secretary determines and notifies the congressional defense committees that fewer scholarships are necessary to address workforce needs. . XVII Space Force personnel management 1701. Short title This title may be cited as the Space Force Personnel Management Act 1702. Space Force Personnel Management Act transition plan (a) Conditions required for enactment (1) In general None of the authorities provide by this title shall take effect until the later of— (A) the Secretary of the Air Force— (i) certifies to the congressional defense committees that any State National Guard affected by the transfer of units, personnel billets, equipment, and resources into the Space Force will be made whole by the transfer of additional assets under the control of the Secretary of the Air Force into the affected State National Guard; and (ii) submits to the congressional defense committees a report that includes a transition plan to move all units, personnel billets, equipment, and resources performing core Space Force functions, under the operational control of the Space Force, or otherwise integral to the Space Force mission that may exist in the reserve components of the Department of the Air Force into the Space Force; and (B) one year after the Secretary of Defense provides the briefing on the study required under section 1703(c). (2) Elements The transition plan required under paragraph (1)(B) shall include the following elements: (A) An identification of any units, personnel billets, equipment, and resources currently residing in the Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard that will be transferred into the Space Force, including, for items currently in the Air National Guard, a breakdown of assets by State. (B) A timeline for the implementation of the authorities provided by this title. (C) An explanation of any units personnel billets, equipment, and resources transferred between the Regular Air Force, Air Force Reserve, Air National Guard, and Space Force, including, for any assets transferred into or out of the Air National Guard, a breakdown of transfers by State. (b) Personnel protections (1) In general In enacting the authorities provided by this title, the Secretary of the Air Force shall not require any currently serving member of the Air National Guard to enlist or commission into the Space Force. (2) Job placement The Secretary of the Air Force shall provide employment opportunities within the Air National Guard to any currently serving member of the Air National Guard who, as a direct result of the enactment of this title, declines to affiliate with the Space Force. (3) Space Force affiliation The Secretary of the Air Force shall guarantee in writing that any member of the Air National Guard who joins the Space Force as a result of the enactment of this title will not lose rank or pay upon transferring to the Space Force. (c) National Guard protections The Secretary of the Air Force shall ensure that no State National Guard loses Federal resources, including net personnel billets and Federal funding, as a result of the enactment of the authorities provided by this title. 1703. Comprehensive assessment of Space Force equities in the National Guard (a) Study required Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into an agreement with a Federally funded research and development center under which such center will conduct an independent study to assess the feasibility and advisability of moving all units, personnel billets, equipment, and resources performing core space functions, under the operational control of the Space Force, or otherwise integral to the Space Force mission that may exist in the National Guard and into a single-component Space Force and provide to the Secretary a report on the findings of the study. The conduct of such study shall include the following elements: (1) An analysis and recommendations associated with at least the three following possible courses of action: (A) Maintaining the current model in which the Air National Guard has units and personnel performing core space functions. (B) Transitioning such units and personnel to the Space Force. (C) The creation of a new National Guard component of the Space Force. (2) A cost-benefit analysis for each of the analyzed courses of action. (3) With respect to the course of action described in paragraph (1)(B), an analysis of the ideal personnel, units, and resources that could be transitioned to the respective Air National Guards of States that may lose space-related personnel, units, and resources as a result of the consolidation of space-related personnel, units, and resources into the Space Force component. (b) Deadline for completion An agreement entered into pursuant to subsection (a) shall specify that the study conducted under the agreement shall be completed by not later than February 1, 2025. (c) Briefing and report (1) In general Upon completion of a study conducted under an agreement entered into pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a briefing and report on the findings of the study, including a description of any proposed personnel, unit, or resource realignments related to the creation of the Space Force single component or recommended by such study. (2) Classification of report The report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include classified appendices as required. A Space Force military personnel system without component 1711. Establishment of military personnel management system for the Space Force Title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subtitle: F Alternative military personnel systems I Space Force Chap. 2001. Space Force Personnel System 20001 2003. Status and Participation 20101 2005. Officers 20201 2007. Enlisted Members 20301 2009. Retention and Separation Generally 20401 2011. Separation of Officers for Substandard Performance of Duty or for Certain Other Reasons 20501 2013. Retirement 20601 2001 Space Force personnel system Sec. 20001. Single military personnel management system. 20002. Members: duty status. 20003. Members: minimum service requirement as applied to Space Force. 20001. Single military personnel management system Members of the Space Force shall be managed through a single military personnel management system, without component. . 1712. Composition of the Space Force without component (a) Composition of the Space Force Section 9081(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking paragraph (1); (2) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively; and (3) in paragraph (1), as so redesignated, by striking , including emergency (b) Effective date The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the certification by the Secretary of the Air Force under section 1745. 1713. Definitions for single personnel management system for the Space Force (a) Space Force definitions Section 101 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (e), (f), and (g) as subsections (f), (g), and (h), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection (e): (e) Space Force The following definitions relating to members of the Space Force apply in this title: (1) The term Space Force active status (2) The term Space Force inactive status (3) The term Space Force retired status (A) is receiving retired pay; or (B) but for being under the eligibility age applicable under section 12731 of this title, would be eligible for retired pay under chapter 1223 of this title. (4) The term sustained duty (A) in the case of an officer— (i) to fulfill the terms of an active-duty service commitment incurred by the officer under any provision of law; or (ii) with the consent of the officer; and (B) in the case of an enlisted member, with the consent of the enlisted member as specified in the terms of the member’s enlistment or reenlistment agreement. . (b) Amendments to existing duty status definitions Subsection (d) of such section is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting , including sustained duty in the Space Force United States (2) in paragraph (7), by inserting , or a member of the Space Force, Reserves 1714. Basic policies relating to service in the Space Force Chapter 2001 20002. Members: duty status Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Air Force, each member of the Space Force shall be placed in one of the following duty statuses: (1) Space Force active status. (2) Space Force inactive status. (3) Space Force retired status. 20003. Members: minimum service requirement as applied to Space Force (a) Inapplicability of active/reserve service distinction In applying section 651 of this title to a person who becomes a member of the Space Force, the provisions of the second sentence of subsection (a) and of subsection (b) of that section (relating to service in a reserve component) are inapplicable. (b) Treatment upon transfer out of space force A member of the Space Force who transfers to one of the other armed forces before completing the service required by subsection (a) of section 651 of this title shall upon such transfer be subject to section 651 of this title in the same manner as if such member had initially entered the armed force to which the member transfers. . 1715. Status and participation Subtitle F of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 1711, is amended by adding at the end the following new chapter: 2003 Status and participation Sec. 20101. Members in Space Force active status: amount of annual training or active duty service required. 20102. Individual ready guardians: designation; mobilization category. 20103. Members not on sustained duty: agreements concerning conditions of service. 20104. Orders to active duty: with consent of member. 20105. Sustained duty. 20106. Orders to active duty: without consent of member. 20107. Transfer to inactive status: initial service obligation not complete. 20108. Members of Space Force: credit for service for purposes of laws providing pay and benefits for members, dependents, and survivors. 20109. Policy for order to active duty based upon determination by Congress. 20101. Members in Space Force active status: amount of annual training or active duty service required Except as specifically provided in regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, a member of the Space Force in a Space Force active status who is not serving on sustained duty shall be required to— (1) participate in at least 48 scheduled drills or training periods during each year and serve on active duty for not less than 14 days (exclusive of travel time) during each year; or (2) serve on active duty for not more than 30 days during each year. 20102. Individual ready guardians: designation; mobilization category (a) In general Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Air Force may designate a member of the Space Force in a Space Force active status as an Individual Ready Guardian. (b) Mobilization category (1) In general Among members of the Space Force designated as Individual Ready Guardians, there is a category of members (referred to as a mobilization category (2) Limitations on placement in mobilization category A member designated as an Individual Ready Guardian may not be placed in the mobilization category referred to in paragraph (1) unless— (A) the member volunteers to be placed in that mobilization category; and (B) the member is selected by the Secretary of the Air Force, based upon the needs of the Space Force and the grade and military skills of that member. (3) Limitation on time in mobilization category A member of the Space Force in a Space Force active status may not remain designated an Individual Ready Guardian in such mobilization category after the end of the 24-month period beginning on the date of the separation of the member from active service. (4) Designation of grades and military skills or specialties The Secretary of the Air Force shall designate the grades and military skills or specialties of members to be eligible for placement in such mobilization category. (5) Benefits A member in such mobilization category shall be eligible for benefits (other than pay and training) on the same basis as are available to members of the Individual Ready Reserve who are in the special mobilization category under section 10144(b) of this title, as determined by the Secretary of Defense. 20103. Members not on sustained duty: agreements concerning conditions of service (a) Agreements The Secretary of the Air Force may enter into a written agreement with a member of the Space Force not on sustained duty— (1) requiring the member to serve on active duty for a definite period of time; (2) specifying the conditions of the member’s service on active duty; and (3) for a member serving in a Space Force inactive status, specifying the conditions for the member’s continued service as well as order to active duty with and without the consent of the member. (b) Conditions of service An agreement under subsection (a) shall specify the conditions of service. The Secretary of the Air Force shall prescribe regulations establishing— (1) what conditions of service may be specified in the agreement; (2) the obligations of the parties; and (3) the consequences of failure to comply with the terms of the agreement. (c) Authority for retention on active duty during war or national emergency If the period of service on active duty of a member under an agreement under subsection (a) expires during a war or during a national emergency declared by Congress or the President, the member concerned may be kept on active duty, without the consent of the member, as otherwise prescribed by law. 20104. Orders to active duty: with consent of member (a) Authority A member of the Space Force who is serving in a Space Force active status and is not on sustained duty, or who is serving in a Space Force inactive status, may, with the consent of the member, be ordered to active duty, or retained on active duty, under the following sections of chapter 1209 of this title in the same manner as applies to a member of a reserve component ordered to active duty, or retained on active duty, under that section with the consent of the member: (1) Section 12301(d), relating to orders to active duty at any time with the consent of the member. (2) Section 12301(h), relating to orders to active duty in connection with medical or health care matters. (3) Section 12322, relating to active duty for health care. (4) Section 12323, relating to active duty pending line of duty determination required for response to sexual assault. (b) Applicable provisions of law The following sections of chapter 1209 of this title pertaining to a member of a reserve component ordered to active duty with the consent of the member apply to a member of the Space Force who is ordered to active duty under this section in the same manner as to such a reserve component member: (1) Section 12308, relating to retention after becoming qualified for retired pay. (2) Section 12309, relating to use of Reserve officers in expansion of armed forces. (3) Section 12313, relating to release of reserve members from active duty. (4) Section 12314, relating to kinds of duty. (5) Section 12315, relating to duty with or without pay. (6) Section 12316, relating to payment of certain Reserves while on duty. (7) Section 12318, relating to duties and funding of reserve members on active duty. (8) Section 12320, relating to grade in which ordered to active duty. (9) Section 12321, relating to a limitation on number of reserve members assigned to Reserve Officer Training Corps units. 20105. Sustained duty (a) Enlisted members An authority designated by the Secretary of the Air Force may order an enlisted member of the Space Force in a Space Force active status to sustained duty, or retain an enlisted member on sustained duty, with the consent of that member, as specified in the terms of the member’s enlistment or reenlistment agreement. (b) Officers (1) An authority designated by the Secretary of the Air Force may order a Space Force officer in a Space Force active status to sustained duty— (A) with the consent of the officer; or (B) to fulfill the terms of an active-duty service commitment incurred by the officer under any provision of law. (2) An officer ordered to sustained duty under paragraph (1) may not be released from sustained duty without the officer’s consent except as provided in chapter 2009 or 2011 of this title. 20106. Orders to active duty: without consent of member (a) Members in a Space Force active status (1) A member of the Space Force in a Space Force active status who is not on sustained duty, may, without the consent of the member, be ordered to active duty or inactive duty in the same manner as a member of a reserve component ordered to active duty or inactive duty under the provisions of chapter 1209 of this title and any other provision of law authorizing the order to active duty of a member of a reserve component in an active status without the consent of the member. (2) The provisions of chapter 1209 of this title, or other applicable provisions of law, pertaining to a member of the Ready Reserve when ordered to active duty shall apply to a member of the Space Force who is in a Space Force active status when ordered to active duty under paragraph (1). (3) The provisions of section 12304 of this title pertaining to members in the Individual Ready Reserve mobilization category shall apply to a member of the Space Force who is designated an Individual Ready Guardian when ordered to active duty who meets the provisions of section 20102(b) of this title. (b) Members in a Space Force inactive status (1) A member of the Space Force in a Space Force inactive status may be ordered to active duty under— (A) the provisions of chapter 1209 of this title; (B) any other provision of law authorizing the order to active duty of a member of a reserve component in an inactive status; and (C) the terms of any agreement entered into by the member under section 20103 of this title. (2) The provisions of chapter 1209 of this title, or other applicable provisions of law, pertaining to the Standby Reserve shall apply to a member of the Space Force who is in a Space Force inactive service when ordered to active duty. (c) Members in a Space Force retired status (1) Chapters 39 and 1209 of this title include provisions authorizing the order to active duty of a member of the Space Force in a Space Force retired status. (2) The provisions of sections 688, 688a, and 12407 of this title pertaining to a retired member or a member of the Retired Reserve shall apply to a member of the Space Force in a Space Force retired status when ordered to active duty. (3) The provisions of section 689 of this title pertaining to a retired member ordered to active duty shall apply to a member of the Space Force in a Space Force retired status who is ordered to active duty. (d) Other applicable provisions The following provisions of chapter 1209 of this title pertaining shall apply to a member of the Space Force ordered to active duty in the same manner as to a Reserve or member of the Retired Reserve ordered to active duty: (1) Section 12305, relating to the authority of the President to suspend certain laws relating to promotion, retirement, and separation. (2) Section 12308, relating to retention after becoming qualified for retired pay. (3) Section 12313, relating to release from active duty. (4) Section 12314, relating to kinds of duty. (5) Section 12315, relating to duty with or without pay. (6) Section 12316, relating to payment of certain Reserves while on duty. (7) Section 12317, relating to theological students; limitations. (8) Section 12320, relating to grade in which ordered to active duty. 20107. Transfer to inactive status: initial service obligation not complete (a) General rule A member of the Space Force who has not completed the required minimum service obligation referred to in section 20003 of this title shall, if terminating Space Force active status, be transferred to a Space Force inactive status and, unless otherwise designated an Individual Ready Guardian under section 20102 of this title, shall remain subject to order to active duty without the member’s consent under section 20106 of this title. (b) Exception Subsection (a) does not apply to a member who is separated from the Space Force by the Secretary of the Air Force under section 20503 of this title. 20108. Members of Space Force: credit for service for purposes of laws providing pay and benefits for members, dependents, and survivors For the purposes of laws providing pay and benefits for members of the Armed Forces and their dependents and beneficiaries: (1) Military training, duty, or other service performed by a member of the Space Force in a Space Force active status not on sustained duty shall be considered military training, duty, or other service, as the case may be, as a member of a reserve component. (2) Sustained duty performed by a member of the Space Force under section 20105 of this title shall be considered active duty as a member of a regular component. (3) Active duty performed by a member of the Space Force in a Space Force active status not on sustained duty shall be considered active duty as a member of a reserve component. (4) Inactive-duty training performed by a member of the Space Force shall be considered inactive-duty training as a member of a reserve component. 20109. Policy for order to active duty based upon determination by Congress Whenever Congress determines that more units and organizations capable of conducting space operations are needed for the national security than are available among those units comprised of members of the Space Force serving on active duty, members of the Space Force not serving on active duty shall be ordered to active duty and retained as long as so needed. . 1716. Officers (a) Original appointments Subtitle F of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 1715, is further amended by adding at the end the following new chapter: 2005 Officers Subchapter Sec. I. Original appointments 20201 II. Selection boards 20211 III. Promotions 20231 IV. Persons not considered for promotion and other promotion-related provisions 20241 V . Applicability of other laws 20251 I Original appointments Sec. 20201. Original appointments: how made. 20202. Original appointments: qualifications. 20203. Original appointments: service credit. 20201. Original appointments: how made The provisions of section 531 of this title shall apply to original appointments of commissioned officers in the Space Force. 20202. Original appointments: qualifications (a) In general An original appointment as a commissioned officer in the Space Force may be given only to a person who— (1) is a citizen of the United States; (2) is at least 18 years of age; and (3) has such other physical, mental, moral, professional, and age qualifications as the Secretary of the Air Force may prescribe by regulation. (b) Exception A person who is otherwise qualified, but who has a physical condition that the Secretary of the Air Force determines will not interfere with the performance of the duties to which that person may be assigned, may be appointed as an officer in the Space Force. 20203. Original appointments: service credit The provisions of section 533 of this title shall apply to the crediting of prior active commissioned service for original appointments of commissioned officers. . (b) Conforming amendments relating to original appointments (1) Definitions Section 101 of title 10, United States Code, is amended in subsection (b)(10) by inserting before the period at the end the following: and, with respect to the appointment of a member of the armed forces in the Space Force, refers to that member’s most recent appointment in the Space Force that is neither a promotion nor a demotion (2) Original appointments of commissioned officers Section 531 of such title is amended by striking Regular Space Force (3) Qualifications for original appointment as a commissioned officer Section 532(a) of such title is amended by striking Regular Marine Corps, or Regular Space Force or Regular Marine Corps (4) Service credit upon original appointment as a commissioned officer Section 533 of such title is amended by striking Regular Space Force (c) Selection boards and promotions Chapter 205 II Selection boards Sec. 20211. Convening of selection boards. 20212. Composition of selection boards. 20213. Notice of convening of selection boards. 20214. Information furnished to selection boards. 20215. Recommendations for promotion by selection boards. 20216. Reports of selection boards. 20217. Action on reports of selection boards for promotion to brigadier general or major general. 20211. Convening of selection boards (a) In general Whenever the needs of the service require, the Secretary of the Air Force shall convene selection boards to recommend for promotion to the next higher permanent grade officers of the Space Force in each permanent grade from first lieutenant through brigadier general. (b) Exception for officers in grade of first lieutenant Subsection (a) does not require the convening of a selection board in the case of Space Force officers in the permanent grade of first lieutenant when the Secretary of the Air Force recommends for promotion to the grade of captain under section 20238(a)(4)(A) of this title all such officers whom the Secretary finds to be fully qualified for promotion. (c) Section 20404 The Secretary of the Air Force may convene selection boards to recommend officers for early retirement under section 20404(a) of this title or for discharge under section 20404(b) of this title. (d) Regulations The convening of selection boards under subsection (a) shall be under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Defense. 20212. Composition of selection boards — (a) Appointment and composition of boards (1) In general Members of a selection board shall be appointed by the Secretary of Air Force in accordance with this section. A selection board shall consist of five or more officers of the Space Force. Each member of a selection board must be serving in a grade higher than the grade of the officers under consideration by the board, except that no member of a board may be serving in a grade below major. The members of a selection board shall include at least one member serving on sustained duty and at least one member in a Space Force active status who is not serving on sustained duty. The ratio of the members of a selection board serving on sustained duty to members serving in a Space Force active status not on sustained duty shall, to the extent practicable, reflect the ratio of officers serving in each of those statuses who are being considered for promotion by the board. The members of a selection board shall represent the diverse population of the Space Force to the extent practicable. (2) Representation from competitive categories (A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), a selection board shall include at least one officer from each competitive category of officers to be considered by the board. (B) A selection board need not include an officer from a competitive category when there are no officers of that competitive category on the Space Force officer list in a grade higher than the grade of the officers to be considered by the board and eligible to serve on the board. (3) Retired officers If qualified officers on the Space Force officer list are not available in sufficient number to comprise a selection board, the Secretary of the Air Force shall complete the membership of the board by appointing as members of the board— (A) Space Force officers who hold a grade higher than the grade of the officers under consideration by the board and who are retired officers; and (B) if sufficient Space Force officers are not available pursuant to subparagraph (A), Air Force officers who hold a grade higher than the grade of the officers under consideration by the board and who are retired officers, but only if the Air Force officer to be appointed to the board has served in a space-related career field of the Air Force for sufficient time such that the Secretary of the Air Force determines that the retired Air Force officer has adequate knowledge concerning the standards of performance and conduct required of an officer of the Space Force. (4) Exclusion of retired general officers on active duty to serve on a board from numeric general officer active-duty limitations A retired general officer who is on active duty for the purpose of serving on a selection board shall not, while so serving, be counted against any limitation on the number of general and flag officers who may be on active duty. (b) Limitation on membership on consecutive boards (1) General rule Except as provided in paragraph (2), no officer may be a member of two successive selection boards convened under section 20211 of this title for the consideration of officers of the same grade. (2) Exception for general officer boards Paragraph (1) does not apply with respect to selection boards convened under section 20211 of this title for the consideration of officers in the grade of colonel or brigadier general. (c) Joint qualified officers (1) Each selection board convened under section 20211 of this title that will consider an officer described in paragraph (2) shall include at least one officer designated by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff who is a joint qualified officer. (2) Paragraph (1) applies with respect to an officer who— (A) is serving on, or has served on, the Joint Staff; or (B) is a joint qualified officer. (3) The Secretary of Defense may waive the requirement in paragraph (1) for any selection board of the Space Force. 20213. Notice of convening of selection boards (a) Notice to eligible officers At least 30 days before a selection board is convened under section 20211 of this title to recommend officers in a grade for promotion to the next higher grade, the Secretary of the Air Force shall— (1) notify in writing the officers eligible for consideration for promotion of the date on which the board is to convene and the name and date of rank of the junior officer, and of the senior officer, in the promotion zone as of the date of the notification; or (2) issue a general written notice to the Space Force regarding the convening of the board which shall include the convening date of the board and the name and date of rank of the junior officer, and of the senior officer, in the promotion zone as of the date of the notification. (b) Communication from officers An officer eligible for consideration by a selection board convened under section 20211 of this title (other than an officer who has been excluded under section 20231(d) of this title from consideration by the board) may send a written communication to the board, to arrive not later than 10 calendar days before the date on which the board convenes, calling attention to any matter concerning the officer that the officer considers important to the officer’s case. The selection board shall give consideration to any timely communication under this subsection. (c) Notice of intent of certain officers To serve on or off active duty An officer on the Space Force officer list in the grade of colonel or brigadier general who receives a notice under subsection (a) shall inform the Secretary of the officer’s preference to serve either on or off active duty if promoted to the grade of brigadier general or major general, respectively. 20214. Information furnished to selection boards The provisions of section 615 of this title shall apply to information furnished to selection boards. 20215. Recommendations for promotion by selection boards The provisions of section 616 of this title shall apply to recommendations for promotion by selection boards. 20216. Reports of selection boards The provisions of section 617 of this title shall apply to reports of selection boards. 20217. Action on reports of selection boards for promotion to brigadier general or major general The provisions of section 618 of this title shall apply to action on reports of selection boards. III Promotions Sec. 20231. Eligibility for consideration for promotion: time-in-grade and other requirements. 20232. Eligibility for consideration for promotion: designation as joint qualified officer required before promotion to brigadier general; exceptions. 20233. Opportunities for consideration for promotion. 20234. Space Force officer list. 20235. Competitive categories. 20236. Numbers to be recommended for promotion. 20237. Establishment of promotion zones. 20238. Promotions: how made; authorized delay of promotions. 20231. Eligibility for consideration for promotion: time-in-grade and other requirements (a) Time-in-grade requirements (1) An officer who is in a Space Force active status on the Space Force officer list and holds a permanent appointment in the grade of second lieutenant or first lieutenant may not be promoted to the next higher permanent grade until the officer has completed the following period of service in the grade in which the officer holds a permanent appointment: (A) Eighteen months, in the case of an officer holding a permanent appointment in the grade of second lieutenant. (B) Two years, in the case of an officer holding a permanent appointment in the grade of first lieutenant. (2) Subject to paragraph (5), an officer who is in a Space Force active status on the Space Force officer list and holds a permanent appointment in a grade above first lieutenant may not be considered for selection for promotion to the next higher permanent grade until the officer has completed the following period of service in the grade in which the officer holds a permanent appointment: (A) Three years, in the case of an officer holding a permanent appointment in the grade of captain, major, or lieutenant colonel. (B) One year, in the case of an officer holding a permanent appointment in the grade of colonel or brigadier general. (3) When the needs of the service require, the Secretary of the Air Force may prescribe a longer period of service in grade for eligibility for promotion, in the case of officers to whom paragraph (1) applies, or for eligibility for consideration for promotion, in the case of officers to whom paragraph (2) applies. (4) When the needs of the service require, the Secretary of the Air Force may prescribe a shorter period of service in grade, but not less than two years, for eligibility for consideration for promotion, in the case of officers designated for limited duty to whom paragraph (2) applies. (5) The Secretary of the Air Force may waive paragraph (2) to the extent necessary to assure that officers described in subparagraph (A) of such paragraph have at least two opportunities for consideration for promotion to the next higher grade as officers below the promotion zone. (6) In computing service in grade for purposes of this section, service in a grade held as a result of assignment to a position is counted as service in the grade in which the officer would have served except for such assignment or appointment. (b) Continued eligibility for consideration for promotion of officers who have previously failed of selection (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), an officer who has failed of selection for promotion to the next higher grade remains eligible for consideration for promotion to that grade as long as the officer continues on active duty in other than a retired status and is not promoted. (2) Paragraph (1) does not apply to an officer on active status who is ineligible for consideration for promotion under section 631(c) of this title for the second time. (c) Officers To Be considered by promotion boards (1) Each time a selection board is convened under section 20211 of this title for consideration of officers in a competitive category for promotion to the next higher grade, each officer in the promotion zone (except as provided under paragraph (2)), and each officer above the promotion zone, for the grade and competitive category under consideration shall be considered for promotion. (2) The Secretary of the Air Force— (A) may, in accordance with standards and procedures prescribed by the Secretary of Defense in regulations which shall apply uniformly among the military departments, limit the officers to be considered by a selection board from below the promotion zone to those officers who are determined to be exceptionally well qualified for promotion; (B) may, by regulation, prescribe a period of time, not to exceed one year, from the time an officer on the Space Force officer list transfers on or off of sustained duty during which the officer shall be ineligible for consideration for promotion; and (C) may, by regulation, preclude from consideration by a selection board by which the officer would otherwise be eligible to be considered, an officer who has an established separation date that is within 90 days after the date on which the board is to be convened. (3) (A) The Secretary of Defense may authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to preclude from consideration by selection boards for promotion to the grade of brigadier general, officers in the grade of colonel who— (i) have been considered and not selected for promotion to the grade of brigadier general or by at least two selection boards; and (ii) are determined, in accordance with standards and procedures prescribed pursuant to subparagraph (B), as not being exceptionally well qualified for promotion. (B) If the Secretary of Defense authorizes the Secretary of the Air Force to have the authority described in subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall prescribe by regulation the standards and procedures for the exercise of such authority. Those regulations shall apply uniformly among the military departments and shall include the following provisions: (i) A requirement that the Secretary of the Air Force may exercise such authority in the case of a particular selection board only if the Secretary of Defense approves the exercise of that authority for that board. (ii) A requirement that an officer may be precluded from consideration by a selection board under this paragraph only upon the recommendation of a preselection board of officers convened by the Secretary of the military department concerned and composed of at least three officers all of whom are serving in a grade higher than the grade of such officer. (iii) A requirement that such a preselection board may not recommend that an officer be precluded from such consideration unless the Secretary of the Air Force has given the officer advance written notice of the convening of such board and of the military records that will be considered by the board and has given the officer a reasonable period before the convening of the board in which to submit comments to the board. (iv) A requirement that the Secretary of the Air Force shall provide general guidance to the board in accordance with standards and procedures prescribed by the Secretary of Defense in those regulations. (v) A requirement that the preselection board may recommend that an officer be precluded from consideration by a selection board only on the basis of the general guidance provided by the Secretary Air Force, information in the officer's official military personnel records that has been described in the notice provided the officer as required pursuant to clause (iii), and any communication to the board received from that officer before the board convenes. (d) Certain officers not To Be considered A selection board convened under section 20211 of this title may not consider for promotion to the next higher grade any of the following officers: (1) An officer whose name is on a promotion list for that grade as a result of the officer’s selection for promotion to that grade by an earlier selection board convened under that section. (2) An officer who is recommended for promotion to that grade in the report of an earlier selection board convened under that section, in the case of such a report that has not yet been approved by the President. (3) An officer in the grade of first lieutenant who is on an approved all-fully-qualified-officers list under section 20238(a)(4) of this title. (4) An officer in the grade of captain who is not a citizen of the United States. (5) An officer excluded under subsection (e). (e) Authority To allow officers To opt out of selection board consideration (1) The Secretary of the Air Force may provide that an officer on the Space Force officer list may, upon the officer’s request and with the approval of the Secretary, be excluded from consideration by a selection board convened under section 20211 of this title to consider officers for promotion to the next higher grade. (2) The Secretary of the Air Force may only approve a request under paragraph (1) if— (A) (i) the basis for the request is to allow an officer to complete a broadening assignment, advanced education, another assignment of significant value to the Department, a career progression requirement delayed by the assignment or education; (ii) the Secretary determines the exclusion from consideration is in the best interest of the Space Force; and (iii) the officer has not previously failed of selection for promotion to the grade for which the officer requests the exclusion from consideration; or (B) (i) the officer is serving in a critical skill position that cannot be filled by another Space Force officer serving in the same grade; (ii) the Secretary determines that it is in the best interests of the Space Force for the officer to continue to serve in their current position and grade; and (iii) the officer has not previously opted out of a promotion board under this authority. 20232. Eligibility for consideration for promotion: designation as joint qualified officer required before promotion to brigadier general; exceptions The provisions of section 619a of this title shall apply to officers of the Space Force. 20233. Opportunities for consideration for promotion (a) Specification of number of opportunities for consideration for promotion Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Air Force shall specify the number of opportunities for consideration for promotion to be afforded to Space Force officers for promotion to each grade above the grade of captain. (b) Limitation on number of opportunities that may be specified The number of opportunities for consideration for promotion to be afforded officers of the Space Force for promotion to a particular grade may not exceed five. (c) Limited authority of secretary of the air force To modify number of opportunities The Secretary of the Air Force may change the number of opportunities for consideration for promotion to a particular grade not more frequently than once every five years. (d) Authority of secretary of defense To modify number of opportunities The Secretary of Defense may modify the number of opportunities for consideration for promotion to be afforded officers of the Space Force for promotion to a particular grade. 20234. Space Force officer list (a) Single list The Secretary of the Air Force shall maintain a single list of all Space Force officers serving in a Space Force active status. The list shall be known as the Space Force officer list. (b) Order of officers on list Officers shall be carried on the Space Force officer list in the order of seniority of the grade in which they are serving. Officers serving in the same grade shall be carried in the order of their rank in that grade. (c) Effect of service in a temporary appointment An officer whose position on the Space Force officer list results from service under a temporary appointment or in a grade held by reason of assignment to a position has, when that appointment or assignment ends, the grade and position on the Space Force officer list that the officer would have held if the officer had not received that appointment or assignment. 20235. Competitive categories (a) Requirement To establish competitive categories for promotion Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Air Force shall establish at least one competitive category for promotion for officers on the Space Force officer list. Each officer whose name appears on the Space Force officer list shall be carried in a competitive category of officers. Officers in the same competitive category shall compete among themselves for promotion. (b) Single competitive category for promotion to general officer grades The Secretary of the Air Force shall establish a single competitive category for all officers on the Space Force officer list who will be considered by a selection board convened under section 20211 of this title for promotion to the grade of brigadier general or major general. 20236. Numbers to be recommended for promotion (a) Promotion to grades below brigadier general (1) Before convening a selection board under section 20211 of this title to consider officers for recommendation for promotion to a grade below brigadier general and in any competitive category, the Secretary of the Air Force shall determine— (A) the number of positions needed to accomplish mission objectives which require officers of that competitive category in the grade to which the board will recommend officers for promotion; (B) the estimated number of officers needed to fill vacancies in those positions during the period in which it is anticipated that officers selected for promotion will be promoted; and (C) the number of officers in a Space Force active status authorized by the Secretary of the Air Force to serve both on sustained duty and not on sustained duty in the grade and competitive category under consideration. (2) Based on the determinations under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Air Force shall determine the maximum number of officers in that competitive category which the selection board may recommend for promotion. (b) Promotion to brigadier general and major general (1) Before convening a selection board under section 20211 of this title to consider officers for recommendation for promotion to the grade of brigadier general or major general, the Secretary of the Air Force shall determine— (A) the number of positions needed to accomplish mission objectives which require officers serving in a Space Force active status on sustained duty, and in a Space Force active status not on sustained duty, in the grade to which the board will recommend officers for promotion; and (B) the estimated number of officers on sustained duty and not on sustained duty needed to fill vacancies in those positions over the 24-month period beginning on the date on which the selection board convenes. (2) Based on the determinations under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Air Force shall determine the maximum number of officers serving in a Space Force active status on sustained duty, and the maximum number of officers serving in a Space Force active status not on sustained duty, which the selection board may recommend for promotion. 20237. Establishment of promotion zones (a) In general Before convening a selection board under section 20211 of this title to consider officers for promotion to any grade above first lieutenant or lieutenant (junior grade), the Secretary of the Air Force shall establish a promotion zone for officers serving in each grade and competitive category to be considered by the board. (b) Determination of number The Secretary of the Air Force shall determine the number of officers in the promotion zone for officers serving in any grade and competitive category from among officers who are eligible for promotion in that grade and competitive category. Such determination shall be made on the basis of an estimate of— (1) the number of officers needed in that competitive category in the next higher grade in each of the next five years; (2) the number of officers to be serving in that competitive category in the next higher grade in each of the next five years; (3) in the case of a promotion zone for officers to be promoted to a grade to which section 523 of this title is applicable, the number of officers authorized for such grade under such section to be on active duty on the last day of each of the next five fiscal years; and (4) the number of officers that should be placed in that promotion zone in each of the next five years to provide to officers in those years relatively similar opportunity for promotion. 20238. Promotions: how made; authorized delay of promotions (a) Procedure for promotion of officers on an approved promotion list (1) Placement of names on promotion list When the report of a selection board convened under section 20211 of this title is approved by the President, the Secretary of the Air Force shall place the names of all officers approved for promotion within a competitive category on a single list for that competitive category, to be known as a promotion list, in the order of the seniority of such officers on the list or based on particular merit, as determined by the promotion board. A promotion list is considered to be established under this section as of the date of the approval of the report of the selection board under the preceding sentence. (2) Order and timing of promotions Except as provided in subsection (d), officers on a promotion list for a competitive category shall be promoted to the next higher grade when additional officers in that grade and competitive category are needed. Promotions shall be made in the order in which the names of officers appear on the promotion list and after officers previously selected for promotion in that competitive category have been promoted. Officers to be promoted to the grade of first lieutenant shall be promoted in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Air Force. (3) Limitation on promotions to general officer grades to comply with strength limitations Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the promotion of an officer on the Space Force officer list to a general officer grade shall be delayed if that promotion would cause any strength limitation of section 526 of this title to be exceeded. The delay shall expire when the Secretary of the Air Force determines that the delay is no longer required to ensure compliance with the strength limitation. (4) Promotion of first lieutenants on an all-fully-qualified officers list (A) Except as provided in subsection (d), officers on the Space Force officer list in the grade of first lieutenant who are on an approved all-fully-qualified-officers list shall be promoted to the grade of captain in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Air Force. (B) An all-fully-qualified-officers list shall be considered to be approved for purposes of subparagraph (A) when the list is approved by the President. When so approved, such a list shall be treated in the same manner as a promotion list under this chapter. (C) The Secretary of the Air Force may make a recommendation to the President for approval of an all-fully-qualified-officers list only when the Secretary determines that all officers on the list are needed in the next higher grade to accomplish mission objectives. (D) For purposes of this paragraph, an all-fully-qualified-officers list is a list of all officers on the Space Force officers list in a grade who the Secretary of the Air Force determines— (i) are fully qualified for promotion to the next higher grade; and (ii) would be eligible for consideration for promotion to the next higher grade by a selection board convened under section 20211 of this title upon the convening of such a board. (E) If the Secretary of the Air Force determines that one or more officers or former officers were not placed on an all-fully-qualified-list under this paragraph because of administrative error, the Secretary may prepare a supplemental all-fully-qualified-officers list containing the names of any such officers for approval in accordance with this paragraph. (b) Date of rank The date of rank of an officer appointed to a higher grade under this section is determined under section 741(d) of this title. (c) Appointment authority Appointments under this section shall be made by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, except that appointments under this section in the grade of first lieutenant or captain shall be made by the President alone. (d) Authority To delay appointments for specified reasons The provisions of subsection (d) of section 624 of this title shall apply to the appointment of an officer under this section in the same manner as they apply to an appointment of an officer under that section, and any reference in that subsection to an active-duty list shall be treated for purposes of applicability to an officer of the Space Force as referring to the Space Force officer list. IV Persons not considered for promotion and other promotion-related provisions Sec. 20241. Persons not considered for promotion and other promotion-related provisions. 20241. Persons not considered for promotion and other promotion-related provisions Subchapter III of chapter 36 of this title shall apply to officers of the Space Force. V Applicability of other laws Sec. 20251. Applicability of certain DOPMA officer personnel policy provisions. 20251. Applicability of certain DOPMA officer personnel policy provisions Except as otherwise modified or provided for in this chapter, the following provisions of chapter 36 of this title (relating to promotion, separation, and involuntary retirement of officers on the active-duty list) shall apply to Space Force officers and officer promotions: (1) Subchapter I (relating to selection boards). (2) Subchapter II (relating to promotions). (3) Subchapter III (relating to failure of selection for promotion and retirement for years of service). (4) Subchapter IV (relating to continuation on active duty and selective early retirement). (5) Subchapter V (additional provisions relating to promotion, separation, and retirement). (6) Subchapter VI (relating to alternative promotion authority for officers in designated competitive categories). . (d) Temporary ( brevet Section 605 of title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows: (1) Coverage of Space Force officers Subsections (a), (b)(2)(A), (f)(1), and (f)(2) are amended by striking or Marine Corps, Marine Corps, or Space Force, (2) Disaggregation of air force maximum numbers Subsection (g) is amended— (A) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively; and (B) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraphs (2) and (3): (2) In the case of the Air Force— (A) as captain, 95; (B) as major, 305; (C) as lieutenant colonel, 165; and (D) as colonel, 75. (3) In the case of the Space Force— (A) as captain, 5; (B) as major, 20; (C) as lieutenant colonel, 10; and (D) as colonel, 5. . 1717. Enlisted members (a) In general Subtitle F of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 1716, is further amended by adding at the end the following new chapter: 2007 Enlisted members Sec. 20301. Original enlistments: qualifications; grade. 20302. Enlisted members: term of enlistment. 20303. Reference to chapter 31. 20301. Original enlistments: qualifications; grade (a) Original enlistments (1) Authority to accept The Secretary of the Air Force may accept original enlistments in the Space Force of qualified, effective, and able-bodied persons. (2) Age A person accepted for original enlistment shall be not less than seventeen years of age. However, no person under eighteen years of age may be originally enlisted without the written consent of the person’s parent or guardian, if the person has a parent or guardian entitled to the person’s custody and control. (b) Grade A person is enlisted in the Space Force in the grade prescribed by the Secretary of the Air Force. 20302. Enlisted members: term of enlistment (a) Term of original enlistments The Secretary of the Air Force may accept original enlistments of persons for the duration of their minority or for a period of at least two but not more than eight years in the Space Force. (b) Term of reenlistments The Secretary of the Air Force may accept a reenlistment in the Space Force for a period determined in accordance with paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) of section 505(d) of this title. 20303. Reference to chapter 31 For other provisions of this title applicable to enlistments in the Space Force, see chapter 31 of this title. . (b) Amendments to title 10 chapter relating to enlistments Chapter 31 of such title is amended as follows: (1) Recruiting campaigns Section 503(a) is amended by striking and Regular Coast Guard Regular Coast Guard, and the Space Force (2) Qualifications, term, grade Section 505 is amended— (A) by striking Regular Space Force, (B) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (e) For enlistments in the Space Force, see sections 20301 and 20302 of this title. . (3) Extension of enlistments during war Section 506 is amended by striking Regular Space Force (4) Reenlistment Section 508 is amended striking Regular Space Force (5) Enlistment incentives for pursuit of skills to facilitate national service Section 510(c) is amended— (A) in paragraph (2), by inserting or the Space Force Selected Reserve (B) in paragraph (3)— (i) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) and (E) as subparagraphs (E) and (F), respectively; (ii) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following new subparagraph (D): (D) in the Space Force; ; and (iii) in subparagraph (F), as so redesignated, by striking subparagraphs (A) through (D) subparagraphs (A) through (E) (6) College first program Section 511(b)(1)(A) is amended by inserting or as a member of the Space Force, reserve component, (7) Delayed entry program Section 513(a) is amended— (A) by inserting, , or who is qualified under section 20301 of this title and applicable regulations for enlistment in the Space Force, armed force (B) by inserting , or be enlisted as a member of the Space Force, Coast Guard Reserve (8) Effect upon enlisted status of acceptance of appointment as cadet or midshipman Section 516(b) is amended by inserting or in the Space Force, armed force 1718. Retention and separation generally (a) In general Subtitle F of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 1717, is further amended by adding at the end the following new chapter: 2009 Retention and separation generally Sec. 20401. Applicability of certain provisions of law related to separation. 20402. Enlisted members: standards and qualifications for retention. 20403. Officers: standards and qualifications for retention. 20404. Selection of officers for early retirement or discharge. 20405. Force shaping authority. 20401. Applicability of certain provisions of law related to separation (a) Officer separation Except as specified in this section or otherwise modified in this chapter, the provisions of chapter 59 of this title applicable to officers of a regular component shall apply to officers of the Space Force. (b) Enlisted member separation Except as specified in this section or otherwise modified in this chapter, the provisions of chapter 59 of this title applicable to enlisted members of a regular component shall apply to enlisted members of the Space Force. (c) Separation pay upon involuntary discharge or release from active duty The provisions of section 1174 of this title— (1) pertaining to a regular officer shall apply to a Space Force officer serving on sustained duty; (2) pertaining to a regular enlisted member shall apply to an enlisted member of the Space Force serving on sustained duty; and (3) pertaining to other members shall apply to members of the Space Force not serving on sustained duty. (d) Voluntary separation incentive The provisions of section 1175 of this title pertaining to a voluntary appointment, enlistment, or transfer to a reserve component shall apply to the voluntary release from active duty of a member of the Space Force on sustained duty. (e) Voluntary separation pay and benefits The provisions of section 1176 of this title— (1) pertaining to a regular enlisted member shall apply to an enlisted member of the Space Force serving on sustained duty; and (2) pertaining to a reserve enlisted member serving in an active status shall apply to an enlisted member of the Space Force serving in a Space Force active status or on sustained duty. 20402. Enlisted members: standards and qualifications for retention (a) Standards and qualifications for retention Subject to such limitations as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe, the Secretary of the Air Force shall, by regulation, prescribe— (1) standards and qualifications for the retention of enlisted members of the Space Force; and (2) equitable procedures for the periodic determination of the compliance of each such member with those standards and qualifications. (b) Effect of failure To comply with standards and qualifications If an enlisted member serving in Space Force active status fails to comply with the standards and qualifications prescribed under subsection (a), the member shall— (1) if qualified, be transferred to Space Force inactive status; (2) if qualified, be retired in accordance with section 20603 of this title; or (3) have the member’s enlistment terminated. 20403. Officers: standards and qualifications for retention (a) Standards and qualifications To be retained in an active status, a Space Force officer must— (1) in any applicable yearly period, attain the number of points specified under section 12732(a)(2) of this title; and (2) conform to such other standards and qualifications as the Secretary may prescribe for officers of the Space Force. (b) Result of failure To comply A Space Force officer who fails to attain the number of points prescribed under subsection (a)(1), or to conform to the standards and qualifications prescribed under subsection (a)(2), may be referred to a board convened under section 20501(a) of this title. 20404. Selection of officers for early retirement or discharge (a) Consideration for early retirement The Secretary of the Air Force may convene selection boards under section 20211(b) of this title to consider for early retirement officers on the Space Force officer list as follows: (1) Officers in the grade of lieutenant colonel who have failed of selection for promotion at least one time and whose names are not on a list of officers recommended for promotion. (2) Officers in the grade of colonel who have served in that grade for at least two years and whose names are not on a list of officers recommended for promotion. (3) Officers, other than those described in paragraphs (1) and (2), holding a grade below the grade of colonel— (A) who are eligible for retirement under section 20601 of this title or who after two additional years or less of active service would be eligible for retirement under that section; and (B) whose names are not on a list of officers recommended for promotion. (b) Consideration for discharge (1) Subject to such limitations as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe, the Secretary of the Air Force may convene selection boards under section 20211 of this title to consider for discharge officers on the Space Force officer list— (A) who have served at least one year of active status in the grade currently held; (B) whose names are not on a list of officers recommended for promotion; and (C) who are not eligible to be retired under any provision of law (other than by reason of eligibility pursuant to section 4403 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 ( Public Law 102–484 (2) An officer who is recommended for discharge by a selection board convened pursuant to the authority of paragraph (1) and whose discharge is approved by the Secretary of the Air Force shall be discharged on a date specified by the Secretary. (3) Selection of officers for discharge under paragraph (1) shall be based on the needs of the service. (c) Discharges and retirements considered To Be involuntary The discharge or retirement of an officer pursuant to this section shall be considered to be involuntary for purposes of any other provision of law. 20405. Force shaping authority (a) Authority The Secretary of the Air Force may, solely for the purpose of restructuring the Space Force— (1) discharge an officer described in subsection (b); or (2) involuntarily release such an officer from sustained duty. (b) Covered officers (1) The authority under this section may be exercised in the case of an officer of the Space Force serving on sustained duty who— (A) has completed not more than six years of service as a commissioned officer in the armed forces; or (B) has completed more than six years of service as a commissioned officer in the armed forces, but has not completed the minimum service obligation applicable to that officer. (2) In this subsection, the term minimum service obligation (c) Regulations The Secretary of the Air Force shall prescribe regulations for the exercise of the Secretary's authority under this section. . (b) Conforming amendments Section 647 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting (other than an officer of the Space Force) in the case of an officer (2) in subsection (c), by striking Regular Marine Corps, of Regular Space Force or Regular Marine Corps (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (e) Space Force For a similar provision with respect to officers of the Space Force, see section 20405 of this title. . 1719. Separation of officers for substandard performance of duty or for certain other reasons Subtitle F of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 1718, is further amended by adding at the end the following new chapter: 2011 Separation of officers for substandard performance of duty or for certain other reasons Sec. 20501. Authority to establish procedures to consider the separation of officers for substandard performance of duty and for certain other reasons. 20502. Retention boards. 20503. Removal of officer: action by secretary upon recommendation of retention board. 20504. Rights and procedures. 20505. Officer considered for removal: voluntary retirement or discharge. 20506. Officers eligible to serve on retention boards. 20501. Authority to establish procedures to consider the separation of officers for substandard performance of duty and for certain other reasons (a) Procedures for review of record of officers relating to standards of performance of duty (1) The Secretary of the Air Force shall prescribe, by regulation, procedures for the review at any time of the record of any commissioned officer (other than a retired officer) of the Space Force in a Space Force active status to determine whether the officer shall be required, because of a reason stated in paragraph (2), to show cause for the officer’s retention in a Space Force active status. (2) The reasons referred to in paragraph (1) are the following: (A) The officer’s performance of duty has fallen below standards prescribed by the Secretary of Defense. (B) The officer has failed to satisfy the standards and qualifications established under section 20403 of this title by the Secretary of the Air Force. (b) Procedures for review of record of officers relating to certain other reasons (1) The Secretary of the Air Force shall prescribe, by regulation, procedures for the review at any time of the record of any commissioned officer (other than a retired officer) of the Space Force in a Space Force active status to determine whether the officer should be required, because of a reason stated in paragraph (2), to show cause for the officer’s retention in a Space Force active status. (2) The reasons referred to in paragraph (1) are the following: (A) Misconduct. (B) Moral or professional dereliction. (C) The officer’s retention is not clearly consistent with the interests of national security. (c) Secretary of defense limitations Regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Air Force under this section are subject to such limitations as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe. 20502. Retention boards (a) Convening of boards To consider officers required To show cause The Secretary of the Air Force shall convene retention boards at such times and places as the Secretary may prescribe to receive evidence and make findings and recommendations as to whether an officer who is required under section 20501 of this title to show cause for retention in a Space Force active status should be retained in a Space Force active status. Each retention board shall be composed of not less than three officers having the qualifications prescribed by section 20506 of this title. (b) Fair and impartial hearing A retention board shall give a fair and impartial hearing to each officer required under section 20501 of this title to show cause for retention in a Space Force active status. (c) Effect of board determination that an officer has failed To establish that the officer should be retained (1) If a retention board determines that the officer has failed to establish that the officer should be retained in a Space Force active status, the board shall recommend to the Secretary of the Air Force one of the following: (A) That the officer be transferred to an inactive status. (B) That the officer, if qualified under any provision of law, be retired. (C) That the officer be discharged from the Space Force. (2) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Air Force, an officer as to whom a retention board makes a recommendation under paragraph (1) that the officer not be retained in a Space Force active status may be required to take leave pending the completion of the officer's case under this chapter. The officer may be required to begin such leave at any time following the officer's receipt of the report of the retention board, including the board's recommendation for removal from a Space Force active status, and the expiration of any period allowed for submission by the officer of a rebuttal to that report. The leave may be continued until the date on which action by the Secretary of the Air Force on the officer's case is completed or may be terminated at any earlier time. (d) Effect of board determination that an officer has established that the officer should be retained (1) If a retention board determines that the officer has established that the officer should be retained in a Space Force active status, the officer's case is closed. (2) An officer who is required to show cause for retention in a Space Force active status under subsection (a) of section 20501 of this title and who is determined under paragraph (1) to have established that the officer should be retained in a Space Force active status may not again be required to show cause for retention in a Space Force active status under such subsection within the one-year period beginning on the date of that determination. (3) (A) Subject to subparagraph (B), an officer who is required to show cause for retention in a Space Force active status under subsection (b) of section 20501 of this title and who is determined under paragraph (1) to have established that the officer should be retained in a Space Force active status may again be required to show cause for retention at any time. (B) An officer who has been required to show cause for retention in a Space Force active status under subsection (b) of section 20501 of this title and who is thereafter retained in an active status may not again be required to show cause for retention in a Space Force active status under such subsection solely because of conduct which was the subject of the previous proceedings, unless the findings or recommendations of the retention board that considered the officer’s previous case are determined to have been obtained by fraud or collusion. (4) In the case of an officer described in paragraph (2) or paragraph (3)(A), the retention board may recommend that the officer be required to complete additional training, professional education, or such other developmental programs as may be available to correct any identified deficiencies and improve the officer’s performance within the Space Force. 20503. Removal of officer: action by Secretary upon recommendation of retention board The Secretary of the Air Force may remove an officer from Space Force active status if the removal of such officer from Space Force active status is recommended by a retention board convened under section 20502 of this title. 20504. Rights and procedures (a) In general Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Air Force, each officer required under section 20501 of this title to show cause for retention in a Space Force active status— (1) shall be notified in writing, at least 30 days before the hearing of the officer’s case by a retention board, of the reasons for which the officer is being required to show cause for retention in a Space Force active status; (2) shall be allowed a reasonable time, as determined by the board, to prepare the officer’s showing of cause for retention in a Space Force active status; (3) shall be allowed to appear either in person or through electronic means and to be represented by counsel at proceedings before the board; and (4) shall be allowed full access to, and shall be furnished copies of, records relevant to the officer’s case, except that the board shall withhold any record that the Secretary determines should be withheld in the interest of national security. (b) Summary of records withheld in interest of national security When a record is withheld under subsection (a)(4), the officer whose case is under consideration shall, to the extent that the interest of national security permits, be furnished a summary of the record so withheld. 20505. Officer considered for removal: voluntary retirement or discharge (a) In general At any time during proceedings under this chapter with respect to the removal of an officer from a Space Force active status, the Secretary of the Air Force may grant a request by the officer— (1) for voluntary retirement, if the officer is qualified for retirement; or (2) for discharge in accordance with subsection (b)(2). (b) Retirement or discharge An officer removed from a Space Force active status under section 20503 of this title shall— (1) if eligible for voluntary retirement under any provision of law on the date of such removal, be retired in the grade and with the retired pay for which the officer would be eligible if retired under such provision; and (2) if ineligible for voluntary retirement under any provision of law on the date of such removal— (A) be honorably discharged in the grade then held, in the case of an officer whose case was brought under subsection (a) of section 20501 of this title; or (B) be discharged in the grade then held, in the case of an officer whose case was brought under subsection (b) of section 20501 of this title. (c) Separation pay for discharged officer An officer who is discharged under subsection (b)(2) is entitled, if eligible therefor, to separation pay under section 1174(a)(2) of this title. 20506. Officers eligible to serve on retention boards (a) In general The provisions of section 1187 of this title apply to the membership of boards convened under this chapter in the same manner as to the membership of boards convened under chapter 60 of this title. (b) Retired air force officers (1) Authority -In applying subsection (b) of section 1187 of this title to a board convened under this chapter, the Secretary of the Air Force may appoint retired officers of the Air Force, in addition to retired officers of the Space Force, to complete the membership of the board. (2) Limitation -A retired officer of the Air Force may be appointed to a board under paragraph (1) only if the officer served in a space-related career field of the Air Force for sufficient time such that the Secretary of the Air Force determines that the retired Air Force officer has adequate knowledge concerning the standards of performance and conduct required of an officer of the Space Force. . 1720. Retirement (a) In general Subtitle F of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 1719, is further amended by adding at the end the following new chapter: 2013 Voluntary retirement for length of service Sec. 20601. Officers: voluntary retirement for length of service. 20602. Officers: computation of years of service for voluntary retirement. 20603. Enlisted members: voluntary retirement for length of service. 20604. Enlisted members: computation of years of service for voluntary retirement. 20605. Applicability of other provisions of law relating to retirement. 20601. Officers: voluntary retirement for length of service (a) Twenty years or more The Secretary of the Air Force may, upon the officer's request, retire a commissioned officer of the Space Force who has at least 20 years of service computed under section 20602 of this title, at least 10 years of which have been active service as a commissioned officer. (b) Thirty years or more A commissioned officer of the Space Force who has at least 30 years of service computed under section 20602 of this title may be retired upon the officer’s request, in the discretion of the President. (c) Forty years or more Except as provided in section 20503 of this title, a commissioned officer of the Space Force who has at least 40 years of service computed under section 20602 of this title shall be retired upon the officer’s request. 20602. Officers: computation of years of service for voluntary retirement (a) Years of active service For the purpose of determining whether an officer of the Space Force may be retired under section 20601 of this title, the officer's years of service are computed by adding all active service in the armed forces. (b) Reference to section excluding service during certain periods Section 972(b) of this title excludes from computation of an officer's years of service for purposes of this section any time identified with respect to that officer under that section. 20603. Enlisted members: voluntary retirement for length of service (a) Twenty to thirty years Under regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary of the Air Force, an enlisted member of the Space Force who has at least 20, but less than 30, years of service computed under section 20604 of this title may, upon the member’s request, be retired. (b) Thirty years or more An enlisted member of the Space Force who has at least 30 years of service computed under section 20604 of this title shall be retired upon the member’s request. 20604. Enlisted members: computation of years of service for voluntary retirement (a) Years of active service For the purpose of determining whether an enlisted member of the Space Force may be retired under section 20603 of this title, the member’s years of service are computed by adding all active service in the armed forces. (b) Reference to section excluding counting of certain service required To Be made up Time required to be made up under section 972(a) of this title may not be counted in computing years of service under subsection (a). 20605. Applicability of other provisions of law relating to retirement (a) Applicability to members of the Space Force Except as specifically provided for by this chapter, the provisions of this title specified in subsection (b) apply to members of the Space Force as follows: (1) Provisions pertaining to an officer of the Air Force shall apply to an officer of the Space Force. (2) Provisions pertaining to an enlisted member of the Air Force shall apply to an enlisted member of the Space Force. (3) Provisions pertaining to a regular officer shall apply to an officer who is on sustained duty in the Space Force. (4) Provisions pertaining to a regular enlisted member shall apply to an enlisted member who is on sustained duty in the Space Force. (5) Provisions pertaining to a reserve officer shall apply to an officer who is in a Space Force active status but not on sustained duty. (6) Provisions pertaining to a reserve enlisted member shall apply to an enlisted member who is in a Space Force active status but not on sustained duty. (7) Provisions pertaining to service in a regular component shall apply to service on sustained duty. (8) Provisions pertaining to service in a reserve component shall apply to service in a Space Force active status not on sustained duty. (9) Provisions pertaining to a member of the Ready Reserve shall apply to a member of the Space Force who is in a Space Force active status prior to being ordered to active duty. (10) Provisions pertaining to a member of the Retired Reserve shall apply to a member of the Space Force who has retired under chapter 1223 of this title. (b) Provisions of law The provisions of this title referred to in subsection (a) are the following: (1) Chapter 61, relating to retirement or separation for physical disability. (2) Chapter 63, relating to retirement for age. (3) Chapter 69, relating to retired grade. (4) Chapter 71, relating to computation of retired pay. (5) Chapter 941, relating to retirement from the Air Force for length of service. (6) Chapter 945, relating to computation of retired pay. (7) Chapter 1223, relating to retired pay for non-regular service. (8) Chapter 1225, relating to retired grade. . (b) Conforming amendments Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows: (1) Retired members ordered to active duty Section 688(b) is amended— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking Regular Marine Corps, or Regular Space Force or Regular Marine Corps (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) A retired member of the Space Force. . (2) Retired grade Section 9341 is amended— (A) in subsection (a), by striking or the Space Force (B) in subsection (b), by striking or a Regular or Reserve of the Space Force (C) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (c) Space Force (1) The retired grade of a commissioned officer of the Space Force who retires other than for physical disability is determined under section 1370 or 1370a of this title, as applicable to the officer. (2) Unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, a member of the Space Force not covered by paragraph (1) who retires other than for physical disability retires in the grade that the member holds on the date of the member's retirement. . (3) Retired grade of enlisted members after 30 years of service Section 9344(b)(2) is amended by striking Regular Space Force (4) Retired lists Section 9346 is amended— (A) in subsection (a), by striking or the Regular Space Force and a separate retired list containing the name of each retired commissioned officer of the Space Force (other than an officer whose name is on the list maintained under subsection (b)(2)) (B) in subsection (b)— (i) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively; (ii) by inserting (1) (b) (iii) in subparagraph (A), as redesignated by clause (i), by striking , or for commissioned officers of the Space Force other than of the Regular Space Force (iv) in subparagraph (B), as so redesignated, by striking or the Space Force (v) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) The Secretary shall maintain a retired list containing the name of— (A) each person entitled to retired pay who as a member of the Space Force qualified for retirement under section 20601 of this title; and (B) each retired warrant officer or enlisted member of the Space Force who is advanced to a commissioned grade. ; (C) in subsection (c), by striking or the Space Force and a separate retired list containing the name of each retired warrant officer of the Space Force (D) in subsection (d), by striking or the Regular Space Force and a separate retired list containing the name of each retired enlisted member of the Space Force B Conforming amendments related to Space Force military personnel system 1731. Amendments to Department of the Air Force provisions of title 10, United States Code (a) Provisions relating to personnel Part II of subtitle D of title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows: (1) Gender-free basis for acceptance of original enlistments (A) Section 9132 is amended by striking Regular Space Force (B) The heading of such section is amended by striking Regular Space Force Space Force (2) Reenlistment after service as an officer (A) Section 9138(a) is amended by striking Regular Space Force (B) The heading of section 9138 is amended by striking Regular Space Force Space Force (3) Warrant officers: original appointment; qualifications Section 9160 is amended by striking Regular (4) Service as an officer to be counted as enlisted service Section 9252 is amended by striking Regular Space Force (5) Chapter heading (A) The heading of chapter 915 is amended to read as follows: 915 Appointments in the regular air force and in the Space Force . (B) The tables of chapters at the beginning of subtitle D, and at the beginning of part II of subtitle D of such title, are each amended by striking the item relating to chapter 915 and inserting the following new item: 915. Appointments in the Regular Air Force and in the Space Force 9151. . (b) Provisions relating to training generally Section 9401 of such title is amended— (1) in subsection (b)— (A) by striking or the Regular Space Force Regular Air Force (B) by inserting or one of the Space Force in a Space Force active status not on sustained duty, on the active-duty list, (2) in subsection (c)— (A) by striking or Reserve of the Space Force or member of the Space Force in a Space Force active status not on sustained duty (B) by striking the Reserve’s consent the member’s consent (3) in subsection (f)— (A) by striking the Regular Space Force of Space Force members on sustained duty (B) by striking the Space Force Reserve of Space Force members in an active status not on sustained duty (c) Provisions relating to the air force academy Chapter 953 of such title is amended as follows: (1) Permanent professors; director of admissions Section 9436 is amended— (A) in subsection (a)— (i) by striking the equivalent grade in (ii) by inserting or the Space Force Regular Air Force (iii) by striking and a permanent in the Regular Air Force (B) in subsection (b)— (i) by striking the equivalent grade in the grade of lieutenant colonel in (ii) by striking Regular Space Force has the grade equivalent to the grade of colonel in the Regular Air Force Space Force has the grade of colonel in the Space Force (2) Appointment of cadets Section 9442(b) is amended— (A) in paragraph (1)(C), by inserting , or the Space Force, members of reserve components (B) in paragraph (2), by striking Regular Space Force (3) Agreement of cadets to serve as officers Section 9448(a) is amended— (A) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking Regular Space Force (B) in paragraph (3)— (i) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting , or to terminate the officer’s order to sustained duty in the Space Force resign as a regular officer (ii) in subparagraph (A), by striking or as a Reserve in the Space Force for service in the Space Force Reserve or will accept further assignment in a Space Force active status (iii) in subparagraph (B), by inserting , or the Space Force, that reserve component (4) Hazing Section 9452(c) is amended by striking Marine Corps, or Space Force, or Marine Corps, or in the Space Force, (5) Commission upon graduation Section 9453(b) is amended— (A) by striking or in the equivalent grade in the Regular Space Force (B) by inserting before the period the following: or a second lieutenant in the Space Force under section 531 or 20201 of this title (d) Provisions relating to schools and camps Chapter 957 of such title is amended as follows: (1) Purpose Section 9481 is amended— (A) by striking to qualify them for appointment (1) appointment ; (B) by striking or the Space Force Reserve. ; or (C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) appointment as officers, or enlistment as noncommissioned officers, for service in the Space Force in a Space Force active status. . (2) Operation Section 9482(4) is amended by striking or the Regular Space Force or members of the Space Force in an active status 1732. Amendments to subtitle A of title 10, United States Code (a) Provisions relating to organization and general military powers Part I of subtitle A of title 10, Untied States Code, is amended as follows: (1) Annual defense manpower report Section 115a(d)(3)(F) is amended by inserting before the period the following: or, in the case of the Space Force, officers ordered to active duty other than under section 20105(b) of this title (2) Suspension of end-strength and other strength limitations in time of war or national emergency Section 123a(a)(2) is amended by inserting or the Space Force a reserve component (3) Deputy commander of usnorthcom Section 164(e)(4) is amended— (A) by inserting (A) (4) (B) by striking shall be a (i) a qualified officer of a reserve component who is eligible for promotion to the grade of lieutenant general or, in the case of the Navy, vice admiral; or (ii) a qualified officer of the Space Force whose prior service includes service in a Space Force active status other than sustained duty and who is eligible for promotion to the grade of lieutenant general. ; and (C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (B) The requirement in subparagraph (A) does not apply when the officer serving as commander of the combatant command described in that subparagraph is— (i) a reserve component officer; or (ii) an officer of the Space Force whose prior service includes service in a Space Force active status other than sustained duty. . (4) Readiness reports Section 482(a) is amended by inserting and the Space Force active and reserve components (b) Dopma officer personnel provisions Chapter 36 of such title is amended as follows: (1) Nondisclosure of board proceedings Section 613a is amended by striking 573, 611, or 628 573, 611, 628, or 20211 (2) Information furnished to selection boards Section 615(a) is amended— (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting or 20211 section 611(a) (B) in paragraph (3)— (i) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking regular officer regular officer or an officer in the Space Force, a grade above captain or, in the case of the Navy, lieutenant. (ii) in subparagraph (D)— (I) by striking major general, major general or (II) by striking or, in the case of the Space Force, the equivalent grade, (3) Eligibility for consideration for promotion: time-in-grade and other requirements Section 619(a) is amended by striking Marine Corps, or Space Force or Marine Corps (4) Authority to vacate promotions to grades of brigadier general and rear admiral (lower half) Section 625(b) is amended— (A) by striking Marine Corps, or Space Force or Marine Corps (B) by adding at the end the following new sentence: An officer of the Space Force whose promotion is vacated under this section holds the grade of colonel. (5) Acceptance of promotions; oath of office Section 626 is amended by striking section 624 section 624 or 20241 (6) Special selection review board Section 628a is amended— (A) in subsection (a)(1)(A)— (i) by striking major general, major general or (ii) by striking , or an equivalent grade in the Space Force (B) in subsection (e)(2), by adding at the end the following new sentence: However, in the case of an officer on the Space Force officer list, the provisions of section 618 of this title apply to the report and proceedings of a special selection review board convened under this section in the same manner as they apply to report and proceedings of a promotion board convened under section 20211 of this title. (C) in subsection (f)(1), by adding at the end the following new sentence: However, if the report of a special selection review board convened under this section recommends the sustainment of the recommendation for promotion to the next higher grade of an officer on the Space Force officer list who was referred to it for review under this section, and the President approves the report, the officer shall, as soon as practicable, be appointed to the grade in accordance with subsections (b) and (c) of section 20241 of this title. (7) Removal from list of officers recommended for promotion Section 629 is amended— (A) in subsection (b), by inserting or 20241(c) section 624(c) (B) in subsection (c)— (i) by inserting or 20241(a) section 624(a) (ii) by inserting or 20241(c) section 624(c) (8) Retirement for years of service (A) Lieutenant colonels Section 633(a) is amended— (i) by inserting (1) Except as (ii) by striking Regular Marine Corps, or Regular Space Force or Regular Marine Corps (iii) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) Except as provided under section 637(b) or 637a of this title, each officer of the Space Force who holds the grade of lieutenant colonel who is not on a list of officers recommended for promotion to the grade of colonel shall, if not earlier retired, be retired on the first day of the month after the month in which the officer completes 28 years of active commissioned service. . (B) Colonels Section 634(a) is amended— (i) by inserting (1) Except as (ii) by striking Regular Marine Corps, or Regular Space Force or Regular Marine Corps (iii) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) Except as provided under section 637(b) or 637a of this title, each officer of the Space Force who holds the grade of colonel who is not on a list of officers recommended for promotion to the grade of brigadier general shall, if not earlier retired, be retired on the first day of the month after the month in which the officer completes 30 years of active commissioned service. . (C) Brigadier generals Section 635 is amended— (i) by inserting (a) Army, navy, air force, and marine corps Except as (ii) by striking Regular Marine Corps, or Regular Space Force or Regular Marine Corps (iii) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (b) Space Force Except as provided under section 637(b) or 637a of this title, each officer of the Space Force who holds the grade of brigadier general who is not on a list of officers recommended for promotion to the grade of major general shall, if not earlier retired, be retired as specified in subsection (a). . (D) Officers in grades above brigadier general Section 636(a) is amended— (i) by inserting (1) Except as (ii) by striking Regular Marine Corps, or Regular Space Force or Regular Marine Corps (iii) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) Except as provided in subsection (b) or (c) and under section 637(b) or 637a of this title, each officer of the Space Force who holds the grade of major general shall, if not earlier retired, be retired as specified in paragraph (1). . (E) Section headings (i) The heading of section 633 is amended by striking lieutenant colonels and and Space Force lieutenant colonels; regular Navy (ii) The heading of section 634 is amended by striking colonels and and Space Force colonels; regular (iii) The heading of section 635 is amended by striking brigadier generals and and Space Force brigadier generals; regular Navy (iv) The heading of section 636 is amended by striking officers in grades above brigadier general and and Space Force officers in grades above brigadier general; regular Navy officers in grades above (c) Management policies for joint qualified officers Section 661(a) of such title is amended— (1) by striking Marine Corps, and Space Force and Marine Corps (2) by inserting , and officers of the Space Force on the Space Force officer list, active-duty list (d) Leave Chapter 40 of such title is amended as follows: (1) Entitlement and accumulation Section 701 is amended— (A) in subsection (h)— (i) by inserting at the end of paragraph (2) the following new subparagraph: (D) A member of the Space Force in a Space Force active status on sustained duty or subject to a call or order to active duty for a period in excess of 12 months. ; and (ii) in paragraphs (5)(B) and (6), by inserting , or of the Space Force, member of a reserve component (B) in subsection (i), by inserting , or of the Space Force, member of a reserve component (2) Payment upon disapproval of certain board of inquiry recommendations for excess leave required to be taken Section 707a(a)(1) is amended by inserting or 20503 section 1182(c)(2) (3) Career flexibility to enhance retention of members Section 710 is amended— (A) in subsection (a), by inserting or of the Space Force regular components (B) in subsection (b)(2), by inserting , or a Space Force officer in a Space Force active status not on active duty under section 20105(b) of this title, officer (C) in subsection (c)(1), by inserting before the period at the end the following: or, in the case of a member of the Space Force on sustained duty, to accept release from sustained duty orders and to serve in a Space Force active status (D) in subsection (g)(1)(A), by striking chapter 36 or 1405 chapter 36, 1405, or 2005 (e) Limitation on number of officers who may be frocked to a higher grade Section 777(d)(2) of such title is amended by inserting , or for the Space Force, the Space Force officer list, active-duty list (f) Uniform code of military justice Chapter 47 of such title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended as follows: (1) Persons subject to ucmj Section 802 (article 2) is amended— (A) in subsection (a)— (i) in paragraph (1), by inserting and members of the Space Force on active duty under section 20105 of this title, regular component of the armed forces, (ii) in paragraph (3)(A)(i), by inserting or the Space Force reserve component (iii) in paragraph (5), by inserting , or retired members of the Space Force who qualified for a non-regular retirement and are receiving retired pay, a reserve component (iv) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (14) Retired members of the Space Force who qualified for a regular retirement under section 20603 of this title and are receiving retired pay. ; and (B) in subsection (d)— (i) in paragraph (1), by inserting or the Space Force reserve component (ii) in paragraph (2), by inserting or the Space Force a reserve component (iii) in paragraph (4), by inserting or the Space Force in a regular component of the armed forces (2) Jurisdiction to try certain personnel Subsection (d) of section 803 (article 3) is amended by inserting, or the Space Force reserve component (3) Articles to be explained Section 937 (article 137) is amended— (A) in subsection (a)(1)— (i) by striking or (ii) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (B) and inserting ; or (iii) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (C) the member’s initial entrance on active duty or into a Space Force active status. ; (B) in subsection (a)(2)— (i) by striking and (ii) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C); and (iii) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following new subparagraph: (B) after a member of Space Force has completed six months of sustained duty or in the case of a member not on sustained duty, after the member has completed basic or recruit training; and ; (C) in subsection (b)(1)(B), by inserting or the Space Force in a reserve component (D) in subsection (d)(1), by striking or to a member of a reserve component, , to a member of a reserve component, or to a member of the Space Force, (g) Restriction on performance of civil functions by officers on active duty Section 973(b)(1) of such title 10 is amended— (1) by striking and (2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (C) and inserting ; and (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (D) to an officer on the Space Force officer list serving on active duty under section 20105(b) of this title or under a call or order to active duty for a period in excess of 270 days. . (h) Use of commissary stores and mwr retail facilities Section 1063 of such title is amended— (1) in subsection (c)— (A) in the heading, by inserting and space force reserve (B) by inserting or the Space Force reserve component (2) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections (e) and (f), respectively; (3) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d): (d) Members of the Space Force A member of the Space Force in a Space Force active status who is not on sustained duty shall be permitted to use commissary stores and MWR retail facilities under the same conditions as specified in subsection (a) for a member of the Selected Reserve. ; and (4) in subsection (e), as redesignated by paragraph (2), by striking subsection (a) or (b) subsection (a), (b), or (d) (i) Members involuntary separated (1) Eligibility for certain benefits and services Section 1141 of such title is amended— (A) by striking and (B) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (4) and inserting a semicolon; and (C) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (5) in the case of an officer of the Space Force (other than a retired officer), the officer is involuntarily discharged or released from active duty under other than adverse conditions, as characterized by the Secretary of the Air Force; and (6) in the case of an enlisted member of the Space Force, the member is— (A) denied reenlistment; or (B) involuntarily discharged or released from active duty under other than adverse conditions, as characterized by the Secretary of the Air Force. . (2) Separation pay Section 1174(a)(2) of such title is amended by striking , Marine Corps, or Space Force or Marine Corps (j) Boards for the correction of military records Chapter 79 of such title is amended as follows: (1) Review of actions of selection boards and correction of military records Section 1558 is amended— (A) inserting , or the Space Force, reserve component (B) in subsection (b)— (i) in paragraph (1)(C), by striking section 628 or 14502 section 628, 14502, or 20252 (ii) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking or 14705 14507, or 20403 (iii) in paragraph (2)(B)(i), by striking or 14101(a) 14101(a), or 20211 (2) Title of air force service review agency (A) Sections 1555(c)(3) and 1557(f)(3) are amended by inserting the Department of Air Force, (B) Section 1556(a) is amended by inserting the Department of the Army Review Boards Agency, (C) Section 1559(c)(3) is amended by inserting the Department of Air Force, (k) Military family programs Chapter 88 of such title is amended as follows: (1) Members of department of defense military readiness council Section 1781a(b)(1)(B)(iii) is amended— (A) by striking member and member, (B) by inserting , and one of whom shall be the spouse or parent of a member of the Space Force parent of a reserve component member (2) Department of defense policy and plans for military family readiness Section 1781b is amended— (A) in subsection (b)(3), by striking military families of members of the regular components and military families of members of the reserve components military families of members of the regular components, the reserve components, and the Space Force (B) in subsection (c)(2)— (i) by striking both (ii) by striking military families of members of the regular components and military families of members of the reserve components military families of members of the regular components, members of the reserve components, and members of the Space Force (l) Training and education programs (1) Payment of tuition for off-duty training or education Section 2007 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (g) The provisions of this section pertaining to members of the Ready Reserve, the Selected Reserve, or the Individual Ready Reserve also apply to members of the Space Force in a Space Force active status who are not on active duty. . (2) Rotc financial assistant program for specially selected members Section 2107 of such title is amended— (A) in subsection (a)— (i) by striking Navy, Navy or (ii) by striking Marine Corps, or as an officer in the equivalent grade in the Space Force or Marine Corps (B) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (k) Applicability to Space Force (1) Provisions of this section referring to a regular commission, regular officer, or a commission in a regular component shall be treated as also referring to the commission of an officer, or an officer, who is a commissioned officer in the Space Force serving on active duty pursuant to section 20105(b) of this title. (2) Provisions of this section referring to a reserve commission, reserve officer, or a commission in a reserve component shall be treated as also referring to the commission of an officer, or an officer, who is a commissioned officer in the Space Force not serving on active duty pursuant to section 20105(b) of this title. . (3) Duty as rotc administrators and instructors Section 2111 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: The Secretary of the Air Force may detail members of the Space Force in the same manner as regular and reserve members of the Air Force. 1733. Title 38, United States Code (veterans’ benefits) (a) Definitions (1) General definitions Section 101 of title 38, United States Code, is amended— (A) in paragraph (23), by inserting , or for members of the Space Force in a Space Force active status (as defined in section 101(e)(1) of title 10), (including commissioned officers of the Reserve Corps of the Public Health Service) (B) in paragraph (27)— (i) by striking subparagraph (E); and (ii) by redesignating subparagraphs (F), (G), and (H) as subparagraphs (E), (F), and (G), respectively. (2) Definitions for purposes of sgli Section 1965 of such title is amended— (A) in paragraph (2)(A), by inserting , or by members of the Space Force in a Space Force active status (as defined in section 101(e)(1) of title 10) but not on sustained duty under section 20105 of title 10, for Reserves (B) in paragraph (3)(A), by inserting , or for members of the Space Force in a Space Force active status (as defined in section 101(e)(1) of title 10), (including commissioned officers of the Reserve Corps of the Public Health Service) (b) Persons eligible for interment in national cemeteries Section 2402(a) of such title is amended in paragraph (2), by inserting any member of the Space Force, a Reserve component of the Armed Forces, (c) Educational assistance (1) Montgomery gi bill Section 3011(a)(3)(D) of such title is amended by inserting or for further service in the Space Force in a Space Force active status not on sustained duty under section 20105 of title 10 of the Armed Forces, (2) Post 9-11 gi bill Section 3311(c)(3) of such title is amended by inserting , or for further service in the Space Force in a Space Force active status not on sustained duty under section 20105 of title 10, of the Armed Forces C Transition provisions 1741. Transition period In this subtitle, the term transition period 1742. Change of duty status of members of the Space Force (a) Change of duty status (1) Conversion of status and order to sustained duty During the transition period, the Secretary of the Air Force shall change the duty status of each member of the Regular Space Force to Space Force active status and shall, at the same time, order the member to sustained duty under section 20105 of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 1715 of this Act. Any such order may be made without regard to any otherwise applicable requirement that such an order be made only with the consent of the member or as specified in an enlistment agreement or active-duty service commitment. (2) Definitions For purposes of this section, the terms Space Force active status sustained duty (b) Effective date of change of duty status The change of a member’s duty status and order to sustained duty in accordance with subsection (a) shall be effective on the date specified by the Secretary of the Air Force, but not later than the last day of the transition period. 1743. Transfer to the Space Force of members of the Air Force Reserve and the Air National Guard (a) Transfer of members of the air force reserve (1) Officers During the transition period, the Secretary of Defense may, with the officer’s consent, transfer a covered officer of the Air Force Reserve or the Air National Guard to, and appoint the officer in, the Space Force. (2) Enlisted members During the transition period, the Secretary of the Air Force may transfer each covered enlisted member of the Air Force Reserve or the Air National Guard to the Space Force, other than those members who do not consent to the transfer. (3) Effective date of transfers Each transfer under this subsection shall be effective on the date specified by the Secretary of Defense, in the case of an officer, or the Secretary of the Air Force, in the case of an enlisted member, but not later than the last day of the transition period. (b) Regulations Transfers under subsection (a) shall be carried out under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense. In the case of an officer, applicable regulations shall include those prescribed pursuant to section 716 of title 10, United States Code. (c) Term of initial enlistment in Space Force In the case of a covered enlisted member who is transferred to the Space Force in accordance with subsection (a), the Secretary of the Air Force may accept the initial enlistment of the member in the Space Force for a period of less than 2 years, but only if the period of enlistment in the Space Force is not less than the period remaining, as of the date of the transfer, in the member’s term of enlistment in the Air Force Reserve. (d) End strength adjustments upon transfers from air force reserve or Air National Guard to Space Force During the transition period, upon the transfer of a mission of the Air Force Reserve or the Air National Guard to the Space Force— (1) the end strength authorized for the Space Force pursuant to section 115(a)(1)(A) of title 10, United States Code, for the fiscal year during which the transfer occurs shall be increased by the number of billets associated with that mission; and (2) the end strength authorized for the Air Force Reserve and the Air National Guard pursuant to section 115(a)(2) of such title for such fiscal year shall be decreased by the same number. (e) Administrative provisions For purposes of the transfer of covered members of the Air Force Reserve in accordance with subsection (a)— (1) the Air Force Reserve, the Air National Guard, and the Space Force shall be considered to be components of the same Armed Force; and (2) the Space Force officer list shall be considered to be an active-duty list of an Armed Force. (f) Retraining and reassignment for members not transferring If a covered member of the Air Force Reserve or the Air National Guard does not consent to transfer to the Space Force in accordance with subsection (a), the Secretary of the Air Force may, as determined appropriate by the Secretary in the case of the individual member, provide the member retraining and reassignment within the Air Force Reserve. (g) Covered members For purposes of this section, the term covered (1) a member who as of the date of the enactment of this Act holds an Air Force specialty code for a specialty held by members of the Space Force; and (2) any other member designated by the Secretary of the Air Force for the purposes of this section. 1744. Placement of officers on the Space Force officer list (a) Placement on list Officers of the Space Force whose duty status is changed in accordance with section 1742, and officers of the Air Force Reserve or the Air National Guard who transfer to the Space Force in accordance with section 1743, shall be placed on the Space Force officer list in an order determined by their respective grades and dates of rank. (b) Officers of same grade and date of rank Among officers of the same grade and date of rank, placement on the Space Force officer list shall be in the order of their rank as determined in accordance with section 741(c) of title 10, United States Code. 1745. Disestablishment of regular Space Force (a) Disestablishment The Secretary of the Air Force shall disestablish the Regular Space Force not later than the end of the transition period, once there are no longer any members remaining in the Regular Space Force. The Regular Space Force shall be disestablished upon the completion of the change of duty status of all members of the Space Force pursuant to section 1742 and certification by the Secretary of the Air Force to the congressional defense committees that there are no longer any members of the Regular Space Force. (b) Publication of notice in federal register The Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register notice of the disestablishment of the Regular Space Force, including the date thereof, together with any certification submitted pursuant to subsection (a). (c) Conforming repeal (1) Repeal Section 9085 of title 10, United States Code, relating to the composition of the Regular Space Force, is repealed. (2) Effective date The amendment made by this subsection shall take effect on the date on which the certification is submitted under subsection (a). 1746. End strength flexibility (a) Additional authority To vary end strengths (1) Authority Notwithstanding section 115(g) of title 10, United States Code, upon determination by the Secretary of the Air Force that such action would enhance manning and readiness in essential units or in critical specialties, the Secretary may vary the end strength authorized by Congress for a fiscal year as follows: (A) Increase the end strength authorized pursuant to section 115(a)(1)(A) of such title for a fiscal year for the Space Force by a number equal to not more than 5 percent of such authorized end strength. (B) Decrease the end strength authorized pursuant to section 115(a)(1)(A) of such title for a fiscal year for the Space Force by a number equal to not more than 10 percent of such authorized end strength. (2) Termination The authority provided under paragraph (1) shall terminate on the last day of the transition period. (b) Temporary exemption for the Space Force from end strength grade restrictions Sections 517 and 523 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply to the Space Force during the transition period. 1747. Promotion authority flexibility (a) Promotion authority flexibility During the transition period, the Secretary of the Air Force may convene selection boards to consider officers on the Space Force officer list for promotion, and may promote Space Force officers selected by such boards, in accordance with any of the following provisions of title 10, United States Code: (1) Chapter 36. (2) Part III of subtitle E. (3) Chapter 2005, as added by section 1716. (b) Coordination of provisions (1) For a selection board convened pursuant to subsection (a) to consider members of the Space Force for promotion in accordance with chapter 36 of such title— (A) provisions that apply to an officer of a regular component of the Armed Forces shall apply to an officer of the Space Force; and (B) the Space Force officer list shall be considered to be an active-duty list. (2) For a selection board convened pursuant to subsection (a) to consider members of the Space Force for promotion in accordance with part III of subtitle E of such title— (A) provisions that apply to an officer of a reserve component of the Armed Forces shall apply to an officer of the Space Force; and (B) the Space Force officer list shall be considered to be a reserve active-status list. (3) For a selection board convened pursuant to subsection (a) to consider members of the Space Force for promotion in accordance with either chapter 36 or part III of subtitle E of such title— (A) section 20213 of such title, as added by section 1716 if this Act, shall apply to the composition of the selection board; (B) the provisions of chapter 2005 of such title, as added by such section 1716, regarding officers on the Space Force officer list eligible to be considered for promotion to the grade of brigadier general or major general shall apply; (C) section 20216 of such title, as so added, shall apply; and (D) the provisions of chapter 36 or part III of subtitle E of such title, as the case may be, regarding failure of selection for promotion shall apply. (c) Effect of using new chapter 2005 authorities If the Secretary of the Air Force convenes a selection board under chapter 2005 D Other amendments related to the Space Force 1751. Title 10, United States Code (a) Amendments relating to the designation of grades for Space Force officers Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows: (1) Commissioned officer grades Section 9151 is amended by inserting and in the Space Force in the Regular Air Force (2) Rank Section 741(a) is amended in the table by striking and Marine Corps Marine Corps, and Space Force (3) Definition of general officer Section 101(b)(4) is amended by striking or Marine Corps Marine Corps, or Space Force (4) Temporary appointments to positions designated to carry the grade of general or lieutenant general Section 601(e) is amended— (A) by striking or Marine Corps, Marine Corps, or Space Force or (B) by striking or the commensurate grades in the Space Force, (5) Retired grade of officers Section 1370 is amended as follows: (A) Subsection (a)(2) is amended by striking rear admiral in the Navy, or the equivalent grade in the Space Force or rear admiral in the Navy (B) Subsection (b) is amended — (i) in paragraph (1)— (I) by striking or Marine Corps the Space Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force or lieutenant in the Navy, (II) in subparagraph (B), by striking major general Space Force major general or rear admiral (ii) in paragraph (4), by striking or Marine Corps Space Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force or captain in the Navy, (iii) in paragraph (5)— (I) in subparagraph (A), by striking or Marine Corps Space Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force or lieutenant commander in the Navy, (II) in subparagraph (B), by striking or Marine Corps Space Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force or commander or captain in the Navy, (III) in subparagraph (C), by striking or Marine Corps Space Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force or rear admiral (lower half) or rear admiral in the Navy, (iv) in paragraph (6), by striking , or an equivalent grade in the Space Force, (C) Subsection (c)(1) is amended by striking or Marine Corps Space Force Marine Corps, or Space Force or vice admiral or admiral in the Navy (D) Subsection (d) is amended— (i) in paragraph (1), by striking or Marine Corps Space Force Marine Corps, or Space Force or rear admiral in the Navy (ii) in paragraph (3), by striking or Marine Corps Space Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force or captain in the Navy, (E) Subsection (e)(2) is amended by striking or Marine Corps Space Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force or vice admiral or admiral in the Navy, (F) Subsection (f) is amended — (i) in paragraph (3)— (I) in subparagraph (A), by striking or Marine Corps Space Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force or rear admiral in the Navy (II) in subparagraph (B), by striking or Marine Corps Space Force Marine Corps, or Space Force or vice admiral or admiral in the Navy (ii) in paragraph (6)— (I) in subparagraph (A), by striking or Marine Corps Space Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force or rear admiral in the Navy (II) in subparagraph (B), by striking or Marine Corps Space Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force or vice admiral or admiral in the Navy (6) Honorary promotions Sections 1563(c)(1) and 1563a(a)(1) are each amended— (A) by striking general, general or (B) by striking , or an equivalent grade in the Space Force (7) Air force inspector general Section 9020(a) is amended by striking the general, flag, or equivalent officers of (b) Other title 10 amendments Such title is further amended as follows: (1) Limitation on number of retired members ordered to active duty Section 690(a) is amended by striking or Marine Corps, Marine Corps, or Space Force, (2) The uniform Section 772(i) is amended— (A) by striking an Air Force School an Air Force or Space Force school (B) by striking aviation badges of the Air Force aviation or space badges of the Air Force or Space Force (3) Membership in military unions, organizing of military unions, and recognition of military unions prohibited Section 976(a)(1)(C) is amended by inserting or the Space Force member of a Reserve component (4) Limitation on enlisted aides Section 981 is amended— (A) in subsection (a), by striking Marine Corps, Air Force, Air Force, Marine Corps, Space Force, (B) in subsection (b), by striking and Marine Corps Marine Corps, and Space Force (C) in subsection (c)(1), by inserting Space Force, Marine Corps, (5) Definition of veteran for purposes of funeral honors Section 1491(h)(1) is amended by striking or air service air, or space service (6) Housing for recruits Section 9419(d) is amended by inserting or the Space Force training program of the Air Force (7) Charter of chief of space operations Section 9082 is amended as follows: (A) Cross-reference correction Subsection (d)(5) is amended by striking sections of law sections 171 and 3104 of this title and other provisions of law (B) Elapsed-time provision Subsection (e)(1) is amended by striking Commencing the Chief The Chief 1752. Other provisions of law (a) Trade act of 1974 Section 233(i)(1) of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2293(i)(1) , or a member of the Space Force, a member of a reserve component of the Armed Forces (b) Title 28, united states code (judiciary and judicial procedure) Section 631(c) of title 28, United States Code is amended by inserting , members of the Space Force , and members of the Army National Guard (c) Servicemembers civil relief act The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act ( 50 U.S.C. 3901 et seq. (1) Definition of military service Section 101(2)(A) ( 50 U.S.C. 3911(2)(A) Space Force, Marine Corps, (2) Same rights and protections as reserves ordered to report for military service Section 106 ( 50 U.S.C. 3917 (c) Treatment of members of Space Force The provisions of subsection (a) apply to a member of the Space Force who is ordered to report for military service in the same manner as to a member of a reserve component who is ordered to report for military service. . (3) Exercise of rights under scra Section 108(5) ( 50 U.S.C. 3919(5) or as a member of the Space Force B Military construction authorizations 2001. Short title This division may be cited as the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law (a) Expiration of authorizations after three years Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained in titles XXI through XXVII for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire on the later of— (1) October 1, 2026; or (2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2027. (b) Exception Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have been obligated before the later of— (1) October 1, 2026; or (2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for fiscal year 2027 for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program. 2003. Effective date Titles XXI through XXVII shall take effect on the later of— (1) October 1, 2023; or (2) the date of the enactment of this Act. XXI Army military construction 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects (a) Inside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Army: Inside the United States State Installation or Location Amount Alabama Redstone Arsenal $50,000,000 Georgia Fort Eisenhower $163,000,000 Hawaii Aliamanu Military Reservation $20,000,000 Fort Shafter $23,000,000 Helemano Military Reservation $33,000,000 Schofield Barracks $37,000,000 Kansas Fort Riley $105,000,000 Kentucky Fort Campbell $38,000,000 Louisiana Fort Johnson $13,400,000 Massachusetts Soldier Systems Center Natick $18,500,000 Michigan Detroit Arsenal $72,000,000 North Carolina Fort Liberty $154,500,000 Pennsylvania Letterkenny Army Depot $89,000,000 Texas Fort Bliss $74,000,000 Red River Army Depot $113,000,000 Washington Joint Base Lewis-McChord $100,000,000 (b) Outside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Army: Outside the United States Country Installation or Location Amount Germany Grafenwoehr $10,400,000 Hohenfels $56,000,000 (c) Prototype project Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military construction projects as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may carry out a military construction project for the installation, and in the amount, set forth in the following table as a prototype project under the pilot program under section 4022(i) of title 10, United States Code, notwithstanding subchapters I and III of chapter 169 and chapters 221 and 223 of title 10, United States Code: Army Prototype Project State Installation Amount North Carolina Fort Liberty $85,000,000 2102. Family housing (a) Construction and acquisition Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following table: Army: Family Housing Country Installation or Location Units Amount Germany Baumholder Family Housing New Construction $78,746,000 Kwajalein Kwajalein Atoll Family Housing Replacement Construction $98,600,000 (b) Improvements to military family housing units Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $100,000,000. (c) Planning and design Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $27,549,000. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2023, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Army as specified in the funding table in section 4601. (b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 2104. Extension of authority to use cash payments in special account from land conveyance, Natick Soldier Systems Center, Massachusetts Section 2844(c)(2)(C) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 115–91 October 1, 2025 October 1, 2027 2105. Extension of authority to carry out fiscal year 2018 project at Kunsan Air Base, Korea (a) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 115–91 Public Law 117–263 (b) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: Army: Extension of 2018 Project Authorization Country Installation or Location Project Original Authorized Amount Korea Kunsan Air Base Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar $53,000,000 2106. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2019 projects (a) Army construction and land acquisition (1) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232 (2) Table The table referred to in paragraph (1) is as follows: Army: Extension of 2019 Project Authorizations State/Country Installation or Location Project Original Authorized Amount Korea Camp Tango Command and Control Facility $17,500,000 Maryland Fort Meade Cantonment Area Roads $16,500,000 (b) Overseas contingency operations (1) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232 (2) Table The table referred to in paragraph (1) is as follows: Army: Extension of 2019 Project Authorizations Country Installation or Location Project Original Authorized Amount Bulgaria Nevo Selo FOS EDI: Ammunition Holding Area $5,200,000 Romania Mihail Kogalniceanu FOS EDI: Explosives & Ammo Load/Unload Apron. $21,651,000 2107. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2021 projects (a) Army construction and land acquisition (1) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (division B of Public Law 116–283 (2) Table The table referred to in paragraph (1) is as follows: Army: Extension of 2021 Project Authorizations State Installation or Location Project Original Authorized Amount Arizona Yuma Proving Ground Ready Building $14,000,000 Georgia Fort Gillem Forensic Lab $71,000,000 Louisiana Fort Johnson Information Systems Facility $25,000,000 (b) Child development center, Georgia (1) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (division B of Public Law 116–283 10 U.S.C. 2802 (2) Project described The project described in this paragraph is the following: Army: Extension of 2021 Project Authorization State Installation or Location Project Original Authorized Amount Georgia Fort Eisenhower Child Development Center $21,000,000 XXII Navy military construction 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects (a) Inside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2203(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Navy: Inside the United States State Installation or Location Amount California Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms $42,100,000 Port Hueneme $110,000,000 Connecticut Naval Submarine Base New London $331,718,000 District of Columbia Marine Barracks Washington $131,800,000 Florida Naval Air Station Whiting Field $141,500,000 Guam Andersen Air Force Base $497,620,000 Joint Region Marianas $174,540,000 Naval Base Guam $946,500,000 Hawaii Marine Corps Base Kaneohe Bay $227,350,000 Maryland Fort Meade $186,480,000 Naval Air Station Patuxent River $141,700,000 North Carolina Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point $270,150,000 Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune $183,780,000 Pennsylvania Naval Surface Warfare Center Philadelphia $88,200,000 Virginia Dam Neck Annex $109,680,000 Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek - Fort Story $35,000,000 Marine Corps Base Quantico $127,120,000 Naval Station Norfolk $158,095,000 Naval Weapons Station Yorktown $221,920,000 Washington Naval Base Kitsap $245,000,000 (b) Outside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2203(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Navy: Outside the United States Country Installation or Location Amount Djibouti Camp Lemonnier $106,600,000 Italy Naval Air Station Sigonella $77,072,000 (c) Prototype project Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2203(a) and available for military construction projects as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out a military construction project for the installation, and in the amount, set forth in the following table as a prototype project under the pilot program under section 4022(i) of title 10, United States Code, notwithstanding subchapters I and III of chapter 169 and chapters 221 and 223 of title 10, United States Code: Navy Prototype Project State Installation Amount Virginia Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek - Fort Story $35,000,000 2202. Family housing (a) Construction and acquisition Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2203(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following table: Navy: Family Housing Country Installation or Location Units Amount Guam Joint Region Marianas Replace Andersen Housing Ph 8 $121,906,000 Mariana Islands Replace Andersen Housing (AF) PH7 $83,126,000 (b) Improvements to military family housing units Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2203(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $57,740,000. (c) Planning and design Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2203(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $14,370,000. 2203. Authorization of appropriations, Navy (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2023, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy, as specified in the funding table in section 4601. (b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 2204. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2019 projects (a) Navy construction and land acquisition projects (1) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232 (2) Table The table referred to in paragraph (1) is as follows: Navy: Extension of 2019 Project Authorizations State/Country Installation or Location Project Original Authorized Amount Bahrain SW Asia Fleet Maintenance Facility & TOC $26,340,000 North Carolina Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune 2nd Radio BN Complex, Phase 2 $51,300,000 South Carolina Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort Recycling/Hazardous Waste Facility $9,517,000 Washington Bangor Pier and Maintenance Facility $88,960,000 (b) Laurel bay fire station, South Carolina (1) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232 (2) Project described The project described in this paragraph is the following:: Navy: Extension of 2019 Project Authorization State Installation or Location Project Original Authorized Amount South Carolina Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort Laurel Bay Fire Station $10,750,000 (c) Overseas contingency operations (1) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232 (2) Table The table referred to in paragraph (1) is as follows: Navy: Extension of 2019 Project Authorizations Country Installation or Location Project Original Authorized Amount Greece Naval Support Activity Souda Bay EDI: Joint Mobility Processing Center $41,650,000 2205. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2021 projects (a) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (division B of Public Law 116–283 (b) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: Navy: Extension of 2021 Project Authorizations State/Country Installation or Location Project Original Authorized Amount California Twentynine Palms Wastewater Treatment Plant $76,500,000 Guam Joint Region Marianas Joint Communication Upgrade $166,000,000 Maine NCTAMS LANT Detachment Cutler Perimeter Security $26,100,000 Nevada Fallon Range Training Complex, Phase I $29,040,000 XXIII Air Force military construction 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects (a) Inside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2303(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Air Force: Inside the United States State Installation or Location Amount Florida MacDill Air Force Base $131,000,000 Patrick Space Force Base $27,000,000 Tyndall Air Force Base $252,000,000 Georgia Robins Air Force Base $115,000,000 Guam Joint Region Marianas $411,000,000 Massachusetts Hanscom Air Force Base $37,000,000 Mississippi Columbus Air Force Base $39,500,000 South Dakota Ellsworth Air Force Base $235,000,000 Texas Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland $20,000,000 Utah Hill Air Force Base $82,000,000 Wyoming F.E. Warren Air Force Base $85,000,000 (b) Outside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2303(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Air Force: Outside the United States Country Installation or Location Amount Australia Royal Australian Air Force Base Darwin $26,000,000 Royal Australian Air Force Base Tindal $130,500,000 Norway Rygge Air Station $119,000,000 Philippines Cesar Basa Air Base $35,000,000 Spain Morón Air Base $26,000,000 United Kingdom Royal Air Force Fairford $47,000,000 Royal Air Force Lakenheath $78,000,000 (c) Prototype project Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2303(a) and available for military construction projects as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out a military construction project for the installation, and in the amount, set forth in the following table as a prototype project under the pilot program under section 4022(i) of title 10, United States Code, notwithstanding subchapters I and III of chapter 169 and chapters 221 and 223 of title 10, United States Code: Air Force Prototype Project State Installation Amount Massachusetts Hanscom Air Force Base $37,000,000 2302. Family housing (a) Improvements to military family housing units Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2303(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $229,282,000. (b) Planning and design Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2303(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $7,815,000. 2303. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2023, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Air Force, as specified in the funding table in section 4601. (b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2301 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 2304. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2017 projects (a) Air Force construction and land acquisition projects (1) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (division B of Public Law 114–328 Public Law 117–181 (2) Table The table referred to in paragraph (1) is as follows: Air Force: Extension of 2017 Project Authorizations Country Installation or Location Project Original Germany Ramstein Air Base 37 AS Squadron Operations/Aircraft Maintenance Unit $13,437,000 Spangdahlem Air Base Upgrade Hardened Aircraft Shelters for F/A-22 $2,700,000 Japan Yokota Air Force Base C-130J Corrosion Control Hangar $23,777,000 (b) Overseas contingency operations (1) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (division B of Public Law 114–328 Public Law 117–181 (2) Table The table referred to in paragraph (1) is as follows: Air Force: Extension of 2017 Project Authorizations Country Installation or Location Project Original Germany Spangdahlem Air Base F/A-22 Low Observable/Composite Repair Facility $12,000,000 2305. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2018 projects (a) Air Force construction and land acquisition projects (1) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 115–91 Public Law 117–263 (2) Table The table referred to in paragraph (1) is as follows: Air Force: Extension of 2018 Project Authorizations State Installation or Location Project Original Florida Tyndall Air Force Base Fire Station $17,000,000 (b) Overseas contingency operations (1) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 115–91 Public Law 117–263 (2) Table The table referred to in paragraph (1) is as follows: Air Force: Extension of 2018 Project Authorizations Country Installation or Location Project Original Hungary Kecskemet Air Base ERI: Airfield Upgrades $12,900,000 Kecskemet Air Base ERI: Construct Parallel Taxiway $30,000,000 Kecskemet Air Base ERI: Increase POL Storage Capacity $12,500,000 Luxembourg Sanem ERI: ECAOS Deployable Airbase System Storage. $67,400,000 Slovakia Malacky ERI: Airfield Upgrades $4,000,000 Malacky ERI: Increase POL Storage Capacity $20,000,000 2306. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2019 projects (a) Air Force construction and land acquisition projects (1) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232 (2) Table The table referred to in paragraph (1) is as follows: Air Force: Extension of 2019 Project Authorizations State/Country Installation or Location Project Original Mariana Islands Tinian APR-Cargo Pad with Taxiway Extension. $46,000,000 Tinian APR-Maintenance Support Facility $4,700,000 Maryland Joint Base Andrews Child Development Center $13,000,000 Joint Base Andrews PAR Relocate Haz Cargo Pad and EOD Range. $37,000,000 New Mexico Holloman Air Force Base MQ–9 FTU Ops Facility $85,000,000 Kirtland Air Force Base Wyoming Gate Upgrade for Anti-Terrorism Compliance $7,000,000 United Kingdom Royal Air Force Lakenheath F-35 ADAL Conventional Munitions MX $9,204,000 Utah Hill Air Force Base Composite Aircraft Antenna Calibration Fac. $26,000,000 (b) Overseas contingency operations (1) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232 (2) Table The table referred to in paragraph (1) is as follows: Air Force: Extension of 2019 Project Authorizations Country Installation or Location Project Original Slovakia Malacky EDI: Regional Munitions Storage Area $59,000,000 United Kingdom RAF Fairford EDI: Construct DABS-FEV Storage $87,000,000 RAF Fairford EDI: Munitions Holding Area $19,000,000 2307. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2021 projects (a) Air Force construction and land acquisition project (1) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (division B of Public Law 116–283 (2) Table The table referred to in paragraph (1) is as follows: Air Force: Extension of 2021 Project Authorization State Installation or Location Project Original Virginia Joint Base Langley-Eustis Access Control Point Main Gate with Lang Acq. $19,500,00 (b) Overseas contingency operations (1) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (division B of Public Law 116–283 (2) Table The table referred to in paragraph (1) is as follows: Air Force: Extension of 2021 Project Authorizations Country Installation or Location Project Original Germany Ramstein EDI: Rapid Airfield Damage Repair Storage $36,345,000 Spangdahlem Air Base EDI: Rapid Airfield Damage Repair Storage $25,824,000 XXIV Defense Agencies military construction 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects (a) Inside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Defense Agencies: Inside the United States State Installation or Location Amount Alabama Redstone Arsenal $147,975,000 California Marine Corps Air Station Miramar $103,000,000 Naval Base Coronado $51,000,000 Naval Base San Diego $101,644,000 Delaware Dover Air Force Base $30,500,000 Maryland Fort Meade $885,000,000 Joint Base Andrews $38,300,000 Montana Great Falls International Airport $30,000,000 North Carolina Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune $70,000,000 Utah Hill Air Force Base $14,200,000 Virginia Fort Belvoir $185,000,000 Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek – Fort Story $61,000,000 Pentagon $30,600,000 Washington Joint Base Lewis – McChord $62,000,000 Manchester $71,000,000 Naval Undersea Warfare Center Keyport $37,000,000 (b) Outside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Defense Agencies: Outside the United States Country Installation or Location Amount Cuba Guantanamo Bay Naval Station $257,000,000 Germany Baumholder $57,700,000 Ramstein Air Base $181,764,000 Honduras Soto Cano Air Base $41,300,000 Japan Kadena Air Base $100,300,000 Spain Naval Station Rota $80,000,000 2402. Authorized Energy Resilience and Conservation Investment Program projects (a) Inside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation projects as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 ERCIP Projects: Inside the United States State Installation or Location Amount California Marine Corps Air Station Miramar $30,550,000 Naval Base San Diego $6,300,000 Vandenberg Space Force Base $57,000,000 Colorado Buckley Space Force Base $14,700,000 Georgia Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay $49,500,000 Kansas Forbes Field $5,850,000 Missouri Lake City Army Ammunition Plant $80,100,000 Nebraska Offutt Air Force Base $41,000,000 North Carolina Fort Liberty (Camp Mackall) $10,500,000 Oklahoma Fort Sill $76,650,000 Puerto Rico Fort Buchanan $56,000,000 Texas Fort Cavazos $18,250,000 Virginia Pentagon $2,250,000 Washington Joint Base Lewis – McChord $49,850,000 Wyoming F.E. Warren Air Force Base $25,000,000 (b) Outside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation projects as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 ERCIP Projects: Outside the United States Country Installation or Location Amount Korea K–16 Air Base $5,650,000 Kuwait Camp Buehring $18,850,000 (c) Improvement of conveyed utility systems In the case of a utility system that is conveyed under section 2688 of title 10, United States Code, and that only provides utility services to a military installation, notwithstanding subchapters I and III of chapter 169 and chapters 221 and 223 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department may authorize a contract with the conveyee of the utility system to carry out the military construction projects set forth in the following table: Improvement of Conveyed Utility Systems State Installation or Location Project Nebraska Offutt Air Force Base Microgrid and Backup Power North Carolina Fort Liberty (Camp Mackall) Microgrid and Backup Power Texas Fort Cavazos Microgrid and Backup Power Washington Joint Base Lewis – McChord Power Generation and Microgrid 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2023, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military departments), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. (b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2401 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 2404. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2018 projects (a) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 115–91 Public Law 117–263 (b) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: Defense Agencies: Extension of 2018 Project Authorizations Country Installation or Location Project Original Authorized Amount Japan Iwakuni Construct Bulk Storage Tanks PH 1 $30,800,000 Puerto Rico Punta Borinquen Ramey Unit School Replacement $61,071,000 2405. Extension and modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2019 projects (a) Extension (1) In general Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232 (2) Table The table referred to in paragraph (1) is as follows: Defense Agencies: Extension of 2019 Project Authorizations Country Installation or Location Project Original Authorized Amount Germany Baumholder SOF Joint Parachute Rigging Facility $11,504,000 Japan Camp McTureous Betchel Elementary School $94,851,000 Iwakuni Fuel Pier $33,200,000 (b) Modification of authority to carry out fiscal year 2019 project in Baumholder, Germany (1) Modification of project authority In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2401(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232 (2) Modification of project amounts (A) Division B table The authorization table in section 2401(b) of the Military Construction Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232 $11,504,000 $23,000,000 (B) Division D table The funding table in section 4601 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 $11,504 $23,000 2406. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2021 projects (a) Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition project (1) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (division B of Public Law 116–283 (2) Table The table referred to in paragraph (1) is as follows: Defense Agencies: Extension of 2021 Project Authorization Country Installation or Location Project Original Authorized Amount Japan Def Fuel Support Point Tsurumi Fuel Wharf $49,500,000 (b) Energy Resilience and Conservation Investment Program projects (1) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (division B of Public Law 116–283 (2) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: ERCIP Projects: Extension of 2021 Project Authorizations State/Country Installation or Location Project Original Authorized Amount Arkansas Ebbing Air National Guard Base PV Arrays and Battery Storage $2,600,000 California Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms Install 10 Mw Battery Energy Storage for Various Buildings $11,646,000 Military Ocean Terminal Concord Military Ocean Terminal Concord Microgrid $29,000,000 Naval Support Activity Monterey Cogeneration Plant at B236 $10,540,000 Italy Naval Support Activity Naples Smart Grid $3,490,000 Nevada Creech Air Force Base Central Standby Generators $32,000,000 Virginia Naval Medical Center Portsmouth Retro Air Handling Units From Constant Volume; Reheat to Variable Air Volume $611,000 2407. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2022 projects In the case of a utility system that is conveyed under section 2688 of title 10, United States Code, and that only provides utility services to a military installation, notwithstanding subchapters I and III of chapter 169 and chapters 221 and 223 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department may authorize a contract with the conveyee of the utility system to carry out the military construction projects set forth in the following table: Improvement of Conveyed Utility Systems State Installation or Location Project Alabama Fort Novosel Construct a 10 MW RICE Generator Plant and Micro-Grid Controls Georgia Fort Moore Construct 4.8MW Generation and Microgrid Fort Stewart Construct a 10 MW Generation Plant, with Microgrid Controls New York Fort Drum Well Field Expansion Project North Carolina Fort Liberty Construct 10 MW Microgrid Utilizing Existing and New Generators Fort Liberty Fort Liberty Emergency Water System 2408. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2023 projects In the case of a utility system that is conveyed under section 2688 of title 10, United States Code, and that only provides utility services to a military installation, notwithstanding subchapters I and III of chapter 169 and chapters 221 and 223 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department may authorize a contract with the conveyee of the utility system to carry out the military construction projects set forth in the following table: Improvement of Conveyed Utility Systems State Installation or Location Project Georgia Fort Stewart – Hunter Army Airfield Power Generation and Microgrid Kansas Fort Riley Power Generation and Microgrid Texas Fort Cavazos Power Generation and Microgrid XXV International programs A North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be appropriated for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction previously financed by the United States. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2023, for contributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program authorized by section 2501 as specified in the funding table in section 4601. B Host country in-kind contributions 2511. Republic of Korea funded construction projects Pursuant to agreement with the Republic of Korea for required in-kind contributions, the Secretary of Defense may accept military construction projects for the installations or locations in the Republic of Korea, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Republic of Korea Funded Construction Projects Component Installation or Location Project Amount Army Camp Bonifas Vehicle Maintenance Shop $7,700,000 Army Camp Carroll Humidity-Controlled Warehouse $189,000,000 Army Camp Humphreys Airfield Services Storage Warehouse $7,100,000 Army Camp Walker Consolidated Fire and Military Police Station $48,000,000 Army Pusan Warehouse Facility $40,000,000 Navy Chinhae Electrical Switchgear Building $6,000,000 Air Force Osan Air Base Consolidated Operations Group and Maintenance Group Headquarters $46,000,000 Air Force Osan Air Base Flight Line Dining Facility $6,800,000 Air Force Osan Air Base Reconnaissance Squadron Operations and Avionics Facility $30,000,000 Air Force Osan Air Base Repair Aircraft Maintenance Hangar B1732 $8,000,000 Air Force Osan Air Base Upgrade Electrical Distribution East, Phase 2 $46,000,000 Air Force Osan Air Base Water Supply Treatment Facility $22,000,000 2512. Republic of Poland funded construction projects Pursuant to agreement with the Republic of Poland for required in-kind contributions, the Secretary of Defense may accept military construction projects for the installations or locations in the Republic of Poland, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Republic of Poland Funded Construction Projects Country Installation or Location Project Amount Army Powidz Barracks and Dining Facility $93,000,000 Army Powidz Rotary Wing Aircraft Apron $35,000,000 Army Swietoszow Bulk Fuel Storage $35,000,000 Army Swietoszow Rail Extension and Railhead $7,300,000 Air Force Wroclaw Aerial Port of Debarkation Ramp $59,000,000 Air Force Wroclaw Taxiways to Aerial Port of Debarkation Ramp $39,000,000 Defense-wide Lubliniec Special Operations Forces Company Operations Facility $16,200,000 XXVI Guard and Reserve Forces facilities 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Army National Guard State Location Amount Arizona Surprise Readiness Center $15,000,000 Florida Camp Blanding $11,000,000 Idaho Jerome County Regional Site $17,000,000 Illinois North Riverside Armory $24,000,000 Kentucky Burlington $16,400,000 Mississippi Southaven $22,000,000 Missouri Belle Fontaine $28,000,000 New Hampshire Littleton $23,000,000 New Mexico Rio Rancho Training Site $11,000,000 New York Lexington Avenue Armory $90,000,000 Ohio Camp Perry Joint Training Center $19,200,000 Oregon Washington County Readiness Center $26,000,000 Pennsylvania Hermitage Readiness Center $13,600,000 Rhode Island North Kingstown $30,000,000 South Carolina Aiken County Readiness Center $20,000,000 McCrady Training Center $7,900,000 Virginia Sandston RC & FMS 1 $20,000,000 Wisconsin Viroqua $18,200,000 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Army Reserve State Location Amount Alabama Birmingham $57,000,000 Arizona Queen Creek $12,000,000 California Fort Hunter Liggett $40,000,000 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve State Location Amount Michigan Battle Creek $24,549,000 Virginia Marine Forces Reserve Dam Neck Virginia Beach $12,400,000 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Air National Guard State Location Amount Alabama Montgomery Regional Airport $7,000,000 Alaska Joint Base Elmendorf – Richardson $7,000,000 Arizona Tucson International Airport $11,600,000 Arkansas Ebbing Air National Guard Base $76,000,000 Colorado Buckley Space Force Base $12,000,000 Indiana Fort Wayne International Airport $8,900,000 Oregon Portland International Airport $71,500,000 Pennsylvania Harrisburg International Airport $8,000,000 Wisconsin Truax Field $5,200,000 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Air Force Reserve State Location Amount Arizona Davis-Monthan Air Force Base $8,500,000 California March Air Reserve Base $226,500,000 Guam Joint Region Marianas $27,000,000 Louisiana Barksdale Air Force Base $7,000,000 Texas Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth $16,000,000 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2023, for the costs of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, under chapter 1803 2607. Extension of authority to carry out fiscal year 2018 project at Hulman Regional Airport, Indiana (a) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 115–91 Public Law 117–263 (b) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: National Guard and Reserve: Extension of 2018 Project Authorization State Installation or Location Project Original Authorized Amount Indiana Hulman Regional Airport Construct Small Arms Range $8,000,000 2608. Extension of authority to carry out fiscal year 2019 project at Francis S. Gabreski Airport, New York (a) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232 (b) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: National Guard and Reserve: Extension of 2019 Project Authorization State Installation or Location Project Original Authorized Amount New York Francis S. Gabreski Airport Security Forces/Comm. Training Facility $20,000,000 2609. Extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2021 projects (a) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (division B of Public Law 116–283 (b) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: National Guard and Reserve: Extension of 2021 Project Authorizations State/Country Installation or Location Project Original Authorized Amount Arkansas Fort Chaffee National Guard Readiness Center $15,000,000 California Bakersfield National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop $9,300,000 Colorado Peterson Space Force Base National Guard Readiness Center $15,000,000 Guam Joint Region Marianas Space Control Facility #5 $20,000,000 Ohio Columbus National Guard Readiness Center $15,000,000 Massachusetts Devens Reserve Forces Training Area Automated Multipurpose Machine Gun Range $8,700,000 North Carolina Asheville Army Reserve Center/Land $24,000,000 Puerto Rico Fort Allen National Guard Readiness Center $37,000,000 South Carolina Joint Base Charleston National Guard Readiness Center $15,000,000 Texas Fort Worth Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Addition/Alt. $6,000,000 Joint Base San Antonio F–16 Mission Training Center $10,800,000 Virgin Islands St. Croix Army Aviation Support Facility (AASF) $28,000,000 CST Ready Building $11,400,000 2610. Modification of authority to carry out fiscal year 2022 project at Nickell Memorial Armory, Kansas (a) Transfer authority From amounts appropriated for Military Construction, Army National Guard Public Law 117–81 Military Construction, Air National Guard (b) Merger of amounts transferred Any amount transferred under subsection (a) shall be merged with and available for the same purposes, and for the same time period, as the Military Construction, Air National Guard (c) Authority Using amounts transferred pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out study, planning, design, and architect and engineer services activities for a sensitive compartmented information facility project at Nickell Memorial Armory, Kansas. 2611. Modification of authority to carry out fiscal year 2023 project at Camp Pendleton, California In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2602 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 (division B of Public Law 117–263 Public Law 117–263 2612. Authority to conduct restoration and modernization projects at the First City Troop Readiness Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania The Chief of the National Guard Bureau may expend amounts available to the Army National Guard for facilities sustainment, restoration, and modernization to conduct restoration and modernization projects at the First City Troop Readiness Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, if— (1) the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has a sufficient remaining lease term for such center to realize the full lifecycle benefit of such a project; (2) the Federal contribution for such a project does not exceed 50 percent of the cost of the project (inclusive of all project costs); and (3) the Chief of the National Guard Bureau notifies the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives not less than 15 days before awarding a contract for such a project, which shall include an explanation of the sufficiency of remaining lease term to justify the investment. XXVII Base realignment and closure activities 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2023, for base realignment and closure activities, including real property acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510 10 U.S.C. 2687 2702. Prohibition on conducting additional base realignment and closure (BRAC) round Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize an additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round. 2703. Closure and disposal of the Pueblo Chemical Depot, Pueblo County, Colorado (a) In general The Secretary of the Army shall close the Pueblo Chemical Depot in Pueblo County, Colorado (in this section referred to as the Depot Chemical Weapons Convention (b) Procedures The Secretary of the Army shall carry out the closure and subsequent related property management and disposal of the Depot, including the land, buildings, structures, infrastructure, and associated equipment, installed equipment, material, and personal property that comprise the Chemical Agent–Destruction Pilot Plant, in accordance with the procedures and authorities for the closure, management, and disposal of property under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510 10 U.S.C. 2687 (c) Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation activities The Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation of the Department of Defense may make grants and supplement other Federal funds pursuant to section 2391 of title 10, United States Code, to support closure and reuse activities of the Depot. (d) Treatment of existing permits Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the removal or demolition by the Program Executive Office, Assembled Chemical Weapons Alternatives of the Department of the Army of existing buildings, structures, infrastructure, and associated equipment, installed equipment, material, and personal property of the Chemical Agent–Destruction Pilot Plant at the Depot in accordance with Hazardous Waste Permit Number CO–20–09–02–01 under the Solid Waste Disposal Act ( 42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (e) Homeless use Given the nature of activities undertaken at the Chemical Agent–Destruction Pilot Plant at the Depot, such land, buildings, structures, infrastructure, and associated equipment, installed equipment, material, and personal property comprising the Chemical Agent–Destruction Pilot Plant is deemed unsuitable for homeless use and, in carrying out any closure, management, or disposal of property under this section, need not be screened for homeless use purposes pursuant to section 2905(b)(7) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510 10 U.S.C. 2687 XXVIII Military construction general provisions A Military Construction Program 2801. Authority for Indo-Pacific posture military construction projects (a) Authority The Commander of the United States Indo-Pacific Command (in this section referred to as the Commander (b) Scope of project authority A project carried out under this section may include any planning, designing, construction, development, conversion, extension, renovation, or repair, whether to satisfy temporary or permanent requirements, and, to the extent necessary, any acquisition of land. (c) Purposes A project carried out under this section shall be for the purpose of— (1) supporting the rotational deployments of the Armed Forces; (2) enhancing facility preparedness and military installation resilience (as defined in section 101(e)(8) of title 10, United States Code) in support of potential, planned, or anticipated national defense activities; or (3) providing for prepositioning and storage of equipment and supplies. (d) Location of projects A project carried out under this section— (1) may be located— (A) at a cooperative security location, forward operating site, or contingency location for use by the Armed Forces; or (B) at a location used by the Armed Forces that is owned or operated by Guam, American Samoa, or the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands; and (2) may be carried out without regard to whether the real property or facilities at the location are under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense if the Commander determines that the United States has a sufficient interest in the property or facility to support the project. (e) Maximum amount The cost of any project carried out under this section may not exceed $15,000,000. (f) Available amounts In carrying out a project under this section, the Commander, or the Secretary of a military department when authorized by the Commander, may use amounts authorized for— (1) the INDOPACOM Military Construction Pilot Program fund; and (2) operation and maintenance that are made available to the Commander, not to exceed 200 percent of the amount specified in section 2805(c) of title 10, United States Code. (g) Notice to Congress (1) In general If the Commander decides to carry out a project under this section with a cost exceeding $2,000,000, the Commander shall notify the congressional defense committees of that determination in an electronic medium pursuant to section 480 of title 10, United States Code. (2) Relevant details Notice under paragraph (1) with respect to a project shall include relevant details of the project, including the estimated cost, and may include a classified annex. (3) Timing A project under this section covered by paragraph (1) may not be carried out until the end of the 14-day period beginning on the date the notification under such paragraph is received by the congressional defense committees. (h) Annual report Not later than December 31 of each year, the Commander shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing a list of projects funded, lessons learned, and, subject to the concurrence of the President, recommended adjustments to the authority under this section for the most recently ended fiscal year. (i) Project execution (1) Project supervision Subsections (a) and (b) of section 2851 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply to projects carried out under this section. (2) Application of chapter 169 When exercising the authority under subsection (a), the Commander shall, for purposes of chapter 169 (j) Sunset The authority to carry out a project under this section expires on March 31, 2029. 2802. Ordering authority for maintenance, repair, and construction of facilities of Department of Defense (a) In general Subchapter I of chapter 169 2817. Ordering authority (a) In general The head of a department or organization within the Department of Defense may place an order, on a reimbursable basis, with any other such department or organization for a project for the maintenance and repair of a facility of the Department of Defense or for a minor military construction project. (b) Obligations An order placed by the head of a department or organization under subsection (a) is deemed to be an obligation of such department or organization in the same manner as a similar order or contract placed with a private contractor. (c) Contingency expenses An order placed under subsection (a) for a project may include an amount for contingency expenses that shall not exceed 10 percent of the cost of the project. (d) Availability of amounts Amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to a department or organization of the Department of Defense shall be available to pay an obligation of such department or organization under this section in the same manner and to the same extent as those amounts are available to pay an obligation to a private contractor. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 2817. Ordering authority. . 2803. Application of area construction cost indices outside the United States Section 2805(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking inside the United States (2) by striking paragraph (2); and (3) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2). 2804. Authorization of cost-plus incentive-fee contracting for military construction projects to mitigate risk to the Sentinel Program schedule and cost (a) In general Notwithstanding section 3323(a) of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense may authorize the use of contracts using cost-plus incentive-fee contracting for military construction projects associated with launch facilities, launch centers, and related infrastructure of the Sentinel Program of the Department of Defense for not more than one low-rate initial production lot at each of the following locations: (1) F.E. Warren Air Force Base. (2) Malmstrom Air Force Base. (3) Minot Air Force Base. (b) Briefing Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and not less frequently than quarterly thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall brief the congressional defense committees on the following: (1) Uncertainties with site conditions at locations specified under subsection (a). (2) The plan of the Department of Defense to transition to firm, fixed price contracts for military construction following any military construction projects carried out under subsection (a). (3) The acquisition process for military construction projects carried out under subsection (a). (4) Updates on the execution of military construction projects carried out under subsection (a). 2805. Extensions to the Military Lands Withdrawal Act relating to Barry M. Goldwater range (a) Renewal of current withdrawal and reservation Section 3031(d)(1) of the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 ( Public Law 106–65 25 years after the date of the enactment of this Act on October 5, 2049 (b) Extension Section 3031(e) of the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 ( Public Law 106–65 (1) in the subsection heading, by striking Initial (2) in paragraph (1), by striking initial 2806. Authority to lease land parcel for hospital and medical campus, Barrigada Transmitter Site, Guam (a) No-cost lease authorized The Secretary of the Navy (in this section referred to as the Secretary (b) Description of property The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be leased under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. (c) Appraisal not required The lease under subsection (a) shall not require an appraisal. (d) Conditions of lease (1) Subject to certain existing encumbrances A lease of property under subsection (a) shall be subject to all existing easements, restrictions, and covenants of record, including restrictive covenants, that the Secretary determines are necessary to ensure that— (A) the use of the property is compatible with continued military activities by the Armed Forces of the United States in Guam; (B) the environmental condition of the property is compatible with the use of the property as a public hospital and medical campus; (C) access is available to the United States to conduct environmental remediation or monitoring as required under section 120(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 ( 42 U.S.C. 9620(h) (D) the property is used only for a public hospital and medical campus, which may include ancillary facilities to support the hospital and campus, or as set forth in subsection (e); and (E) the public hospital and medical campus to be constructed on the property shall— (i) include— (I) an MV–22-capable helipad; (II) recompression chamber capability; and (III) perimeter fencing; and (ii) allow for the relocation of weather radar equipment owned by the United States at the hospital or campus. (2) Funding The Secretary is not required to fund the construction or operation of a hospital or medical campus on the property leased under subsection (a). (3) Payment of administrative costs All direct and indirect administrative costs, including for surveys, title work, document drafting, closing, and labor, incurred by the Secretary related to any lease of the property under subsection (a) shall be borne by the Government of Guam. (e) Additional terms The Secretary may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the lease under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. (f) Not to be considered excess, transferred, or disposed of The property subject to any lease under subsection (a) may not be declared to be excess real property to the needs of the Navy or transferred or otherwise disposed of by the Navy or any Federal agency. 2807. Revision to access and management of Air Force memorial Section 2863(e) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (division B of Public Law 107–107 the Foundation non-Federal Government entities, the Secretary of the Air Force, or both 2808. Development and operation of the Marine Corps Heritage Center and the National Museum of the Marine Corps (a) In general Chapter 861 section 8617 8618. Marine Corps Heritage Center and the National Museum of the Marine Corps (a) Joint venture for development and continued maintenance and operation The Secretary of the Navy (in this section referred to as the Secretary Foundation Facility (b) Design and construction For each phase of development of the Facility, the Secretary may— (1) permit the Foundation to contract for the design, construction, or both of such phase of development; or (2) accept funds from the Foundation for the design, construction, or both of such phase of development. (c) Acceptance authority Upon completion of construction of any phase of development of the Facility by the Foundation to the satisfaction of the Secretary, and the satisfaction of any financial obligations incident thereto by the Foundation, the Facility shall become the real property of the Department of the Navy with all right, title, and interest in and to the Facility belonging to the United States. (d) Maintenance, operation, and support (1) In general The Secretary may, for the purpose of maintenance and operation of the Facility— (A) enter into contracts or cooperative agreements, on a sole-source basis, with the Foundation for the procurement of property or services for the direct benefit or use of the Facility; and (B) notwithstanding the requirements of subsection (h) of section 2667 of this title and under such terms and conditions as the Secretary considers appropriate for the joint venture authorized under subsection (a), lease in accordance with such section 2667 portions of the Facility to the Foundation for use in generating revenue for activities of the Facility and for such administrative purposes as may be necessary for support of the Facility. (2) Consideration for lease In making a determination of fair market value under section 2667(b)(4) of this title for payment of consideration pursuant to a lease described in paragraph (1)(B), the Secretary may consider the entirety of the educational efforts of the Foundation, support by the Foundation to the history division of the Marine Corps Heritage Center, funding of museum programs and exhibits by the Foundation, or other support related to the Facility, in addition to the types of in-kind consideration provided under section 2667(c) of this title. (3) Use for revenue-generating activities (A) In general Subject to subparagraph (B), the Secretary may authorize the Foundation to use real or personal property within the Facility to conduct revenue-generating activities in addition to those authorized under paragraph (1)(B), as the Secretary considers appropriate considering the work of the Foundation and the needs of the Facility. (B) Limitation The Secretary may only authorize the use of the Facility for a revenue-generating activity if the Secretary determines the activity will not interfere with activities and personnel of the armed forces or the activities of the Facility. (4) Retention of lease payments The Secretary shall retain lease payments received under paragraph (1)(B), other than in-kind consideration authorized under paragraph (2) or section 2667(c) of this title, solely for use in support of the Facility, and funds received as lease payments shall remain available until expended. (e) Use of certain gifts (1) In general Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the Commandant of the Marine Corps may, without regard to section 2601 of this title, accept, hold, administer, invest, and spend any gift, devise, or bequest of personal property of a value of $250,000 or less made to the United States if such gift, devise, or bequest is for the benefit of the Facility. (2) Expenses The Secretary may pay or authorize the payment of any reasonable and necessary expense in connection with the conveyance or transfer of a gift, devise, or bequest under paragraph (1). (f) Additional terms and conditions The Secretary may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the joint venture authorized under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 861 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 8617 the following new item: 8618. Marine Corps Heritage Center and the National Museum of the Marine Corps. . (c) Conforming repeal Section 2884 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 ( Public Law 106–398 2809. Authority for acquisition of real property interest in park land owned by the Commonwealth of Virginia (a) Authority The Secretary of the Navy (in this section referred to as the Secretary (b) Terms and conditions The acquisition of property under subsection (a) shall be subject to the following terms and conditions: (1) The Secretary shall pay the Commonwealth of Virginia fair market value for the property to be acquired, as determined by the Secretary. (2) Such other terms and conditions as considered appropriate by the Secretary. (c) Description of property The legal description of the property to be acquired under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey that is satisfactory to the Secretary and the Commonwealth of Virginia. (d) Applicability of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act The provisions of chapter 2003 (e) Reimbursement The Secretary shall reimburse the Commonwealth of Virginia for the reasonable and documented administrative costs incurred by the Commonwealth of Virginia to execute the acquisition by the Secretary of property under subsection (a). (f) Termination of real property interest The real property interest acquired by the Secretary under subsection (a) shall terminate, and be released without cost to the Commonwealth of Virginia, when the Secretary determines such real property interest is no longer required for national security purposes. 2810. Movement or consolidation of Joint Spectrum Center to Fort Meade, Maryland, or another appropriate location (a) Leaving current location Not later than September 30, 2026, the Secretary of Defense shall completely vacate the offices of the Joint Spectrum Center of the Department of Defense in Annapolis, Maryland. (b) Movement or consolidation The Secretary shall take appropriate action to move, consolidate, or both, the offices of the Joint Spectrum Center to the headquarters building of the Defense Information Systems Agency at Fort Meade, Maryland, or another appropriate location chosen by the Secretary for national security purposes to ensure the physical and cybersecurity protection of personnel and missions of the Department of Defense. (c) Status update Not later than January 31 and July 31 of each year until the Secretary has completed the requirements under subsections (a) and (b), the Commander of the Defense Information Systems Agency shall provide an in-person and written update on the status of the completion of those requirements to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives and the congressional delegation of Maryland. (d) Termination of existing lease Upon vacating the offices of the Joint Spectrum Center in Annapolis, Maryland, pursuant to subsection (a), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the existing lease for the Joint Spectrum Center in such location shall be terminated. (e) Repeal of obsolete authority Section 2887 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181 2811. Temporary expansion of authority for use of one-step turn-key selection procedures for repair projects During the five-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, section 2862(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, shall be applied and administered by substituting $12,000,000 $4,000,000 2812. Modification of temporary increase of amounts in connection with authority to carry out unspecified minor military construction (a) In general Section 2801 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 (division B of Public Law 117–263 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (4) as paragraphs (3) through (5), respectively; and (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2): (2) in subsection (b)(2), by substituting $4,000,000 $2,000,000 . (b) Effective date The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply as if included in the enactment of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 (division B of Public Law 117–263 2813. Pilot program on replacement of substandard enlisted barracks (a) In general The Secretary concerned may, in accordance with this section, carry out a pilot program under which the Secretary concerned may replace an existing enlisted barracks with a new enlisted barracks not otherwise authorized by law. (b) Facility requirements A new facility for an enlisted barracks replaced under subsection (a)— (1) may not have a greater personnel capacity than the facility being replaced but may be physically larger than the facility being replaced; (2) must be replacing a facility that is in a substandard condition, as determined by the Secretary concerned, and which determination may not be delegated, in advance of project approval; (3) must be designed and utilized for the same purpose as the facility being replaced; (4) must be located on the same installation as the facility being replaced; and (5) must be designed to meet, at a minimum, current standards for construction, utilization, and force protection. (c) Source of funds The Secretary concerned, in using the authority under this section, may spend amounts available to the Secretary concerned for operation and maintenance or unspecified military construction. (d) Congressional notification When a decision is made to carry out a replacement project under this section with an estimated cost in excess of $10,000,000, the Secretary concerned shall submit, in an electronic medium pursuant to section 480 of title 10, United States Code, to the appropriate committees of Congress a report containing— (1) the justification for the replacement project and the current estimate of the cost of the project; and (2) a description of the elements of military construction, including the elements specified in section 2802(b) of such title, incorporated into the project. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate committees of Congress; facility; Secretary concerned The terms appropriate committees of Congress facility Secretary concerned (2) Enlisted barracks The term enlisted barracks (3) Personnel capacity The term personnel capacity (4) Substandard condition The term substandard condition (f) Sunset The authority under this section shall terminate on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 2814. Expansion of Defense Community Infrastructure Pilot Program to include installations of the Coast Guard Section 2391 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (d)— (A) in paragraph (1)(B), in the matter preceding clause (i), by inserting , in consultation with the Commandant of the Coast Guard, The Secretary (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (5) In considering grants, agreements, or other funding under paragraph (1)(A) with respect to community infrastructure supportive of a military installation of the Coast Guard, the Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Commandant of the Coast Guard to assess the selection and prioritization of the project concerned. ; and (2) in subsection (e)(1), by adding at the end the following new sentence: For purposes of subsection (d), the term military installation 2815. Modification of pilot program on increased use of sustainable building materials in military construction Section 2861 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 ( Public Law 117–81 10 U.S.C. 2802 (1) in subsection (b)(1), by striking the period at the end and inserting “to include, under the pilot program as a whole, at a minimum— (A) one project for mass timber; and (B) one project for low carbon concrete. ; (2) in subsection (d), by striking September 30, 2024 September 30, 2025 (3) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections (f) and (g), respectively; (4) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection (e): (e) Commencement of construction Each military construction project carried out under the pilot program must commence construction by not later than January 1, 2025. ; and (5) in subsection (f)(1), as redesignated by paragraph (3), by striking December 31, 2024 December 31, 2025 B Military Housing I Military Unaccompanied Housing 2821. Uniform condition index for military unaccompanied housing (a) In general Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations requiring the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment to complete and issue a uniform facility condition index for military unaccompanied housing, including such housing that is existing as of the date of the enactment of this Act and any such housing constructed or used on or after such date of enactment. (b) Completion of index The uniform facility condition index required under subsection (a) shall be completed and issued by not later than October 1, 2024. (c) Military unaccompanied housing defined In this section, the term military unaccompanied housing (1) Military housing intended to be occupied by members of the Armed Forces serving a tour of duty unaccompanied by dependents. (2) Transient housing intended to be occupied by members of the Armed Forces on temporary duty. 2822. Certification of habitability of military unaccompanied housing (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall include with the submission to Congress by the President of the annual budget of the Department of Defense under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, a certification from the Secretary of each military department to the congressional defense committees that the cost for all needed repairs and improvements for each occupied military unaccompanied housing facility under the jurisdiction of such Secretary does not exceed 20 percent of the replacement cost of such facility, as mandated by Department of Defense Manual 4165.63, DoD Housing Management (b) Military unaccompanied housing defined In this section, the term military unaccompanied housing (1) Military housing intended to be occupied by members of the Armed Forces serving a tour of duty unaccompanied by dependents. (2) Transient housing intended to be occupied by members of the Armed Forces on temporary duty. 2823. Maintenance work order management process for military unaccompanied housing (a) In general Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations to establish for each military department a process associated with maintenance work order management for military unaccompanied housing under the jurisdiction of such military department, including such housing that is existing as of the date of the enactment of this Act and any such housing constructed or used on or after such date of enactment. (b) Use of process The processes required under subsection (a) shall clearly define requirements for effective and timely maintenance work order management, including requirements with respect to— (1) quality assurance for maintenance completed; (2) communication of maintenance progress and resolution with management of military unaccompanied housing, barracks managers, and residents; and (3) standardized performance metrics, such as the timeliness of completion of work orders. (c) Administration The Secretary of each military department shall administer the work order process required under subsection (a) for such military department and shall issue or update relevant guidance as necessary. (d) Military unaccompanied housing defined In this section, the term military unaccompanied housing (1) Military housing intended to be occupied by members of the Armed Forces serving a tour of duty unaccompanied by dependents. (2) Transient housing intended to be occupied by members of the Armed Forces on temporary duty. 2824. Expansion of uniform code of basic standards for military housing to include military unaccompanied housing (a) In general Section 2818 of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 ( Public Law 116–283 10 U.S.C. 2871 (1) in the section heading, by striking family (2) in subsection (a)— (A) by striking family (B) by inserting , including military unaccompanied housing (as defined in section 2871 of title 10, United States Code) (b) Implementation (1) In general In implementing the amendments made by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the standards required under section 2818 of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 ( Public Law 116–283 10 U.S.C. 2871 (2) Military unaccompanied housing defined In this subsection, the term military unaccompanied housing (A) Military housing intended to be occupied by members of the Armed Forces serving a tour of duty unaccompanied by dependents. (B) Transient housing intended to be occupied by members of the Armed Forces on temporary duty. 2825. Oversight of military unaccompanied housing (a) Civilian oversight (1) In general Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations to require that the Secretary of each military department establish a civilian employee of the Department of Defense, or of the military department concerned, at the housing office for each installation of the Department under the jurisdiction of such Secretary to oversee military unaccompanied housing at that installation. (2) Supervisory chain For any installation of the Department for which the unaccompanied housing manager is a member of the Armed Forces, the civilian employee established under paragraph (1) at such installation shall report to a civilian employee at the housing office for such installation. (b) Barracks or dormitory manager requirements (1) Limitation on role by members of the Armed Forces No enlisted member of the Armed Forces or commissioned officer may be designated as a barracks manager or supervisor in charge of overseeing, managing, accepting, or compiling maintenance records for any military unaccompanied housing as a collateral duty. (2) Position designation The function of a barracks manager or supervisor described in paragraph (1) for an installation of the Department shall be completed by a civilian employee or contractor of the Department who shall report to the government housing office of the installation. (c) Military unaccompanied housing defined In this section, the term military unaccompanied housing (1) Military housing intended to be occupied by members of the Armed Forces serving a tour of duty unaccompanied by dependents. (2) Transient housing intended to be occupied by members of the Armed Forces on temporary duty. 2826. Elimination of flexibilities for adequacy or construction standards for military unaccompanied housing (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall modify all directives, instructions, manuals, regulations, policies, and other guidance and issuances of the Department of Defense to eliminate the grant of any flexibilities to— (1) minimum adequacy standards for configuration, privacy, condition, health, and safety for existing permanent party military unaccompanied housing to be considered suitable for assignment or occupancy; and (2) standards for the construction of new military unaccompanied housing. (b) Matters included The requirement under subsection (a) shall include modifications that remove the flexibility provided to the military departments with respect to standards for adequacy for assignment and new construction standards for military unaccompanied housing, including modification of the Housing Management Manual of the Department of Defense and Department of Defense Manual 4165.63, DoD Housing Management (c) Military unaccompanied housing defined In this section, the term military unaccompanied housing (1) Military housing intended to be occupied by members of the Armed Forces serving a tour of duty unaccompanied by dependents. (2) Transient housing intended to be occupied by members of the Armed Forces on temporary duty. 2827. Design standards for military unaccompanied housing (a) Uniform standards for floor space, number of members allowed, and habitability (1) In general Section 2856 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) in the section heading, by striking local comparability of floor areas standards (B) by striking In (a) Local comparability in floor areas (C) in subsection (a), as designated by subparagraph (B), by inserting , except for purposes of meeting minimum area requirements under subsection (b)(1)(A), exceed (D) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (b) Floor space, number of members allowed, and habitability (1) In general In the design, assignment, and use of military unaccompanied housing, the Secretary of Defense shall establish uniform standards that— (A) provide a minimum area of floor space, not including bathrooms or closets, per individual occupying a unit of military unaccompanied housing; (B) ensure that not more than two individuals may occupy such a unit; and (C) provide definitions and measures for habitability, specifying criteria of design and materiel quality to be applied and levels of maintenance to be required. (2) Waiver Standards established under paragraph (1) may be waived for specific units of military unaccompanied housing by the Secretary concerned (who may not delegate such waiver) for a period not longer than one year and may not be renewed. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter III of chapter 169 2856. Military unaccompanied housing: standards. . (b) Completion and issuance of uniform standards Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall— (1) (A) ensure that the uniform standards required under section 2856(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(1)(D), are completed and issued; and (B) submit to the congressional defense committees a copy of those standards; or (2) submit to the congressional defense committees a report, under the Secretary’s signature— (A) explaining in detail why those standards are not completed and issued; (B) indicating when those standards are expected to be completed and issued; and (C) specifying the names of the personnel responsible for the failure of the Department of Defense to comply with paragraph (1). (c) Compliance with uniform standards (1) In general Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of each military department shall ensure that all military unaccompanied housing, including privatized military housing under subchapter IV of chapter 169 (2) No waiver The requirement under paragraph (1) may not be waived. (3) Military unaccompanied housing defined In this subsection, the term military unaccompanied housing (d) Certification of budget requirements The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) shall include with the submission to Congress by the President of the annual budget of the Department of Defense for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029 under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, a signed certification that the Department of Defense and each of the military departments has requested sufficient funds to comply with this section and the amendments made by this section. 2828. Termination of habitability standard waivers and assessment and plan with respect to military unaccompanied housing (a) Termination of habitability standard waivers On and after February 1, 2025, any waiver by the Department of Defense of habitability standards for military unaccompanied housing in effect as of such date shall terminate. (b) Assessment Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of each military department, shall submit to the congressional defense committees an assessment on the following: (1) The number of waivers currently in place for any standards for military unaccompanied housing as it relates to occupancy and habitability, disaggregated by Armed Force, location, and facility. (2) A list of each such waiver, disaggregated by Armed Force, with a notation of which official appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate approved the waiver. (3) The number of members of the Armed Forces impacted by each such waiver, disaggregated by location. (c) Plan (1) In general Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of each military department, shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives and the Comptroller General of the United States a plan on addressing the deficiencies of military unaccompanied housing, including barracks and dormitories, that led to the use of waivers described in subsection (b)(1). (2) Elements The plan required under paragraph (1) shall include— (A) a timeline for repairs, renovations, or minor or major military construction; (B) the cost of any such repair, renovation, or construction; and (C) an installation-by-installation get-well plan. (3) Implementation Not later than 60 days after receiving the plan required under paragraph (1), the Comptroller General shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on— (A) the ability of the Department of Defense to execute the plan; and (B) any recommendations of the Comptroller General for modifying the plan. (d) Military unaccompanied housing defined In this section, the term military unaccompanied housing (1) Military housing intended to be occupied by members of the Armed Forces serving a tour of duty unaccompanied by dependents. (2) Transient housing intended to be occupied by members of the Armed Forces on temporary duty. 2829. Requirement for security cameras in common areas and entry points of military unaccompanied housing (a) New housing The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that all renovations of military unaccompanied housing authorized on or after the date of the enactment of this Act that exceed 20 percent of the replacement cost of such facility and all construction of new military unaccompanied housing authorized on or after such date are designed and executed with security cameras in all common areas and entry points as part of a closed circuit television system. (b) Retrofitting Not later than three years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall ensure that all military unaccompanied housing facilities are retrofitted with security cameras in all common areas and entry points as part of a closed circuit television system. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) Common area The term common area (2) Military unaccompanied housing The term military unaccompanied housing (A) Military housing intended to be occupied by members of the Armed Forces serving a tour of duty unaccompanied by dependents. (B) Transient housing intended to be occupied by members of the Armed Forces on temporary duty. 2830. Annual report on military unaccompanied housing (a) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for the following four years, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on military unaccompanied housing, excluding privatized military housing under subchapter IV of chapter 169 (b) Elements Each report required under subsection (a) shall contain a section provided by each Secretary of a military department that— (1) is certified by the Secretary concerned; (2) includes a list of all military unaccompanied housing facilities located on each installation under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned; (3) identifies the replacement cost for each such facility; (4) identifies the percentage of repair costs as it compares to the total replacement cost for each such facility; and (5) specifies the funding required to conduct all needed repairs and improvements at each such facility. (c) Military unaccompanied housing defined In this section, the term military unaccompanied housing II Privatized Military Housing 2841. Improvements to privatized military housing (a) Limitation on housing enhancement payments Section 606(a)(2) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 10 U.S.C. 2871 (1) in subparagraph (A)— (A) by striking Each month Except as provided in subparagraph (D), each month (B) by striking one of more one or more (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (D) Limitation on payment (i) In general Subject to clause (ii), the Secretary of a military department may not make a payment under subparagraph (A) to a lessor unless the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment determines the lessor is in compliance with the Military Housing Privatization Initiative Tenant Bill of Rights developed under section 2890 of title 10, United States Code. (ii) Application The limitation under clause (i) shall apply to any payment under a housing agreement entered into on or after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 . (b) Inclusion of information on compliance with tenant bill of rights in notice of lease extension Section 2878(f)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (E) An assessment of compliance by the lessor with the Military Housing Privatization Initiative Tenant Bill of Rights developed under section 2890 of this title. . (c) Modification of authority To investigate reprisals Subsection (e) of section 2890 of such title is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) by striking Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment Inspector General of the Department of Defense (B) by striking member of the armed forces tenant (2) in paragraph (2)— (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)— (i) by striking Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment Inspector General (ii) by striking member of the armed forces tenant (iii) by striking Assistant Secretary Inspector General (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking Assistant Secretary Inspector General (3) in paragraph (3)— (A) by striking Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment Inspector General of the Department of Defense (B) by striking Secretary of the military department concerned Inspector General of the military department concerned 2842. Implementation of Comptroller General Recommendations relating to strengthening oversight of privatized military housing Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall— (1) implement the recommendations of the Comptroller General of the United States contained in the report published by the Comptroller General on April 6, 2023, reissued with revisions on April 20, 2023, and titled DOD Can Further Strengthen Oversight of Its Privatized Housing Program (2) if the Secretary does not implement any such recommendation, submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report explaining why the Secretary has not implemented those recommendations. 2843. Treatment of nondisclosure agreements with respect to privatized military housing Section 2890(f)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking A tenant or prospective tenant of a housing unit may not be required to sign A landlord may not request that a tenant or prospective tenant of a housing unit sign (2) by inserting at the end the following: The military services should seek to inform members of the armed forces of the possible consequences of entering into a nondisclosure agreement and encourage members to seek legal counsel before entering into such an agreement if they have questions about specific contractual terms. III Other Housing Matters 2851. Department of Defense Military Housing Readiness Council (a) In general Subchapter I of chapter 88 section 1781c 1781d. Department of Defense Military Housing Readiness Council (a) In general There is in the Department of Defense the Department of Defense Military Housing Readiness Council (in this section referred to as the Council (b) Members (1) In general The Council shall be composed of the following members: (A) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment, who shall serve as chair of the Council and who may designate a representative to chair the Council in the absence of the Assistant Secretary. (B) One representative of each of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Space Force, each of whom shall be a member of the armed force to be represented and not fewer than two of which shall be from an enlisted component. (C) One spouse of a member of each of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Space Force on active duty, not fewer than two of which shall be the spouse of an enlisted member. (D) One professional from each of the following fields, each of whom shall possess expertise in State and Federal housing standards in their respective field: (i) Plumbing. (ii) Electrical. (iii) Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC). (iv) Certified home inspection. (v) Roofing. (vi) Structural engineering. (vii) Window fall prevention and safety. (E) Two representatives of organizations that advocate on behalf of military families with respect to military housing. (F) One individual appointed by the Secretary of Defense among representatives of the International Code Council. (G) One individual appointed by the Secretary of Defense among representatives of the Institute of Inspection Cleaning and Restoration Certification. (H) One individual appointed by the Secretary of Defense among representatives of a voluntary consensus standards body that develops construction standards (such as building, plumbing, mechanical, or electrical). (I) One individual appointed by the Secretary of Defense among representatives of a voluntary consensus standards body that develops personnel certification standards for building maintenance or restoration. (2) Terms The term on the Council of the members specified under subparagraphs (B) through (M) of paragraph (1) shall be two years and may be renewed by the Secretary of Defense. (3) Attendance by landlords The chair of the Council shall extend an invitation to each landlord for one representative of each landlord to attend such meetings of the Council as the chair considers appropriate. (4) Additional requirements for certain members Each member appointed under paragraph (1)(D) may not be affiliated with— (A) any organization that provides privatized military housing; or (B) the Department of Defense. (c) Meetings The Council shall meet two times each year. (d) Duties The duties of the Council shall include the following: (1) To review and make recommendations to the Secretary of Defense regarding policies for privatized military housing, including inspections practices, resident surveys, landlord payment of medical bills for residents of housing units that have not maintained minimum standards of habitability, and access to maintenance work order systems. (2) To monitor compliance by the Department of Defense with and effective implementation by the Department of statutory and regulatory improvements to policies for privatized military housing, including the Military Housing Privatization Initiative Tenant Bill of Rights developed under section 2890 of this title and the complaint database established under section 2894a of this title. (3) To make recommendations to the Secretary of Defense to improve collaboration, awareness, and promotion of accurate and timely information about privatized military housing, accommodations available through the Exceptional Family Member Program of the Department, and other support services among policymakers, providers of such accommodations and other support services, and targeted beneficiaries of such accommodations and other support services. (e) Public reporting (1) Availability of documents Subject to section 552 of title 5 (commonly known as the Freedom of Information Act (2) Minutes (A) In general Detailed minutes of each meeting of the Council shall be kept and shall contain— (i) a record of the individuals present; (ii) a complete and accurate description of matters discussed and conclusions reached; and (iii) copies of all reports received, issued, or approved by the Council. (B) Certification The chair of the Council shall certify the accuracy of the minutes of each meeting of the Council. (f) Annual reports (1) In general Not later than March 1 each year, the Council shall submit to the Secretary of Defense and the congressional defense committees a report on privatized military housing readiness. (2) Elements Each report under this subsection shall include the following: (A) An assessment of the adequacy and effectiveness of the provision of privatized military housing and the activities of the Department of Defense in meeting the needs of military families relating to housing during the preceding fiscal year. (B) A description of activities of the Council during the preceding fiscal year, including— (i) analyses of complaints of tenants of housing units; (ii) data received by the Council on maintenance response time and completion of maintenance requests relating to housing units; (iii) assessments of dispute resolution processes; (iv) assessments of overall customer service for tenants; (v) assessments of results of housing inspections conducted with and without notice; and (vi) any survey results conducted on behalf of or received by the Council. (C) Recommendations on actions to be taken to improve the capability of the provision of privatized military housing and the activities of the Department of Defense to meet the needs and requirements of military families relating to housing, including actions relating to the allocation of funding and other resources. (3) Public availability Each report under this subsection shall be made available in a publicly accessible format on a website of the Department of Defense. (g) Definitions In this section: (1) Landlord The term landlord (2) Privatized military housing The term privatized military housing . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1781c the following new item: 1781d. Department of Defense Military Housing Readiness Council. . 2852. Inclusion in annual status of forces survey of questions regarding living conditions of members of the Armed Forces The Secretary of Defense shall include in each status of forces survey of the Department of Defense conducted on or after the date of the enactment of this Act questions specifically targeting the following areas: (1) Overall satisfaction of members of the Armed Forces with their current living accommodation. (2) Satisfaction of such members with the physical condition of their current living accommodation. (3) Satisfaction of such members with the affordability of their current living accommodation. (4) Whether the current living accommodation of such members has impacted any decision related to reenlistment in the Armed Forces. C Land Conveyances 2861. Land conveyance, BG J Sumner Jones Army Reserve Center, Wheeling, West Virginia (a) Conveyance authorized (1) In general The Secretary of the Army (in this section referred to as the Secretary City (2) Continuation of existing easements, restrictions, and covenants The conveyance of the property under paragraph (1) shall be subject to any easement, restriction, or covenant of record applicable to the property and in existence on the date of the enactment of this Act. (b) Revisionary interest (1) In general If the Secretary determines at any time that the property conveyed under subsection (a) is not being used in accordance with the purpose of the conveyance specified in such subsection, all right, title, and interest in and to the property, including any improvements thereto, may, at the option of the Secretary, revert to and become the property of the United States, and the United States may have the right of immediate entry onto such property. (2) Determination A determination by the Secretary under paragraph (1) may be made on the record after an opportunity for a hearing. (c) Payment of costs of conveyance (1) Payment required The Secretary may require the City to cover all costs (except costs for environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including costs for environmental and real estate due diligence and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. (2) Refund of excess amounts If amounts are collected from the City under paragraph (1) in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the City. (d) Limitation on source of funds The City may not use Federal funds to cover any portion of the costs required to be paid by the City under this section. (e) Description of property The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. (f) Additional terms and conditions The Secretary may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 2862. Land conveyance, Wetzel County Memorial Army Reserve Center, New Martinsville, West Virginia (a) Conveyance authorized (1) In general The Secretary of the Army (in this section referred to as the Secretary City (2) Continuation of existing easements, restrictions, and covenants The conveyance of the property under paragraph (1) shall be subject to any easement, restriction, or covenant of record applicable to the property and in existence on the date of the enactment of this Act. (b) Revisionary interest (1) In general If the Secretary determines at any time that the property conveyed under subsection (a) is not being used in accordance with the purpose of the conveyance specified in such subsection, all right, title, and interest in and to the property, including any improvements thereto, may, at the option of the Secretary, revert to and become the property of the United States, and the United States may have the right of immediate entry onto such property. (2) Determination A determination by the Secretary under paragraph (1) may be made on the record after an opportunity for a hearing. (c) Payment of costs of conveyance (1) Payment required The Secretary may require the City to cover all costs (except costs for environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including costs for environmental and real estate due diligence and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. (2) Refund of excess amounts If amounts are collected from the City under paragraph (1) in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the City. (d) Limitation on source of funds The City may not use Federal funds to cover any portion of the costs required to be paid by the City under this section. (e) Description of property The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. (f) Additional terms and conditions The Secretary may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. D Other Matters 2871. Authority to conduct energy resilience and conservation projects at installations where non-Department of Defense funded energy projects have occurred Subsection (k) of section 2688 of title 10, United States Codes, is amended to read as follows: (k) Improvement of conveyed utility system (1) In the case of a utility system that has been conveyed under this section and that only provides utility services to a military installation, the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department may authorize a contract on a sole source basis with the conveyee of the utility system to carry out a military construction project as authorized and appropriated for by law for an infrastructure improvement that enhances the reliability, resilience, efficiency, physical security, or cybersecurity of the utility system. (2) The Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military Department may convey under subsection (j) any infrastructure constructed under paragraph (1) that is in addition to the utility system conveyed under such paragraph. . 2872. Limitation on authority to modify or restrict public access to Greenbury Point Conservation Area at Naval Support Activity Annapolis, Maryland (a) In general Except as provided in subsection (b), the Secretary of the Navy may not modify or restrict public access to the Greenbury Point Conservation Area at Naval Support Activity Annapolis, Maryland, until— (1) the Secretary submits to Congress a report describing the manner in which such access will be modified or restricted; and (2) a law is enacted permitting such modifications or restrictions. (b) Exceptions Subsection (a) shall not apply to— (1) temporary restrictions to protect public safety that are necessitated by emergent situations, hazardous conditions, maintenance of existing facilities, or live fire exercises; or (2) the lease or transfer of the Greenbury Point Conservation Area to another public entity. 2873. Authorization for the Secretary of the Navy to resolve the electrical utility operations at Former Naval Air Station Barbers Point (currently known as Kalaeloa (a) In general The Secretary of the Navy (in this section referred to as the Secretary Kalaeloa (b) Elements of agreement An agreement entered into under subsection (a) shall include a requirement that the Secretary— (1) assist with— (A) the transfer of customers of the Navy off of the electrical utility system of the Navy in the location specified in such subsection; and (B) the enhancement of the new surrounding electrical system to accept any additional load from such transfer, with a priority in the downtown area, which is home to nine large customers, including the Hawaii Army National Guard; (2) provide the instantaneous peak demand analysis and design necessary to conduct such transfer; (3) provide rights of way and easements necessary to support the construction of replacement electrical infrastructure; and (4) be responsible for all environmental assessments and remediation and costs related to the removal and disposal of the electrical utility system of the Navy once it is no longer in use. (c) Limitation on expenditure of amounts The Secretary may expend not more than $48,000,000 during any fiscal year to provide support for an agreement entered into under subsection (a). (d) Notification Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and not less frequently than every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on progress made in initiating and executing an agreement under subsection (a). 2874. Clarification of other transaction authority for installation or facility prototyping Section 4022(i) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (2)— (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ; and (B) by striking subparagraph (B); and (C) by striking paragraph (1) not more paragraph (1), except for projects carried out for the purpose of repairing a facility, not more (2) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and (3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3): (3) Use of amounts The Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department may carry out prototype projects under the pilot program established under paragraph (1) using amounts available for military construction, notwithstanding— (A) subchapters I and III of chapter 169 of this title; and (B) chapters 221 and 223 of this title. . 2875. Requirement that Department of Defense include military installation resilience in real property management and installation master planning of Department Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall— (1) update Department of Defense Instruction 4165.70 (relating to real property management) and Unified Facilities Criteria 2–100–01 (relating to installation master planning) to— (A) include a requirement to incorporate the impact of military installation resilience in all installation master plans; (B) include a list of all sources of information approved by the Department of Defense; (C) define the 17 military installation resilience hazards to ensure that the impacts from such hazards are reported consistently across the Department; (D) require military installations to address the rationale for determining that any such hazard is not applicable to the installation; (E) standardize reporting formats for military installation resilience plans; (F) establish and define standardized risk rating categories for the use by all military departments; and (G) define criteria for determining the level of risk to an installation to compare hazards between military departments; and (2) require the Secretary of each military department to update the handbook for the military department concerned to incorporate the requirements under paragraph (1). 2876. Increase of limitation on fee for architectural and engineering services procured by military departments (a) Army Section 7540(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 6 percent 10 percent (b) Navy Section 8612(b) of such title is amended by striking 6 percent 10 percent (c) Air Force Section 9540(b) of such title is amended by striking 6 percent 10 percent 2877. Requirement that all material types be considered for design-bid-build military construction projects (a) In general The Secretary concerned may not proceed from the design phase of a design-bid-build military construction project or solicit bids for the construction phase of a design-bid-build military construction project until the Secretary of Defense certifies that all materials included in the Unified Facilities Criteria of the Department of Defense have been equally considered for such project. (b) Annual report Not later than January 1 of each year, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report— (1) detailing the primary construction material for each design-bid-build military construction project for which a contract was awarded during the previous fiscal year in an amount that exceeds $6,000,000; and (2) identifying whether each such project was designed or constructed based off a shelf design used at another installation of the Department of Defense. (c) Secretary concerned defined In this section, the term Secretary concerned 2878. Continuing education curriculum for members of the military construction planning and design workforce and acquisition workforce of the Department of Defense (a) In general Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a continuing education curriculum for members of the military construction planning and design workforce of the Department of Defense and the acquisition workforce of the Department responsible for military construction projects. (b) Curriculum The continuing education curriculum required under subsection (a)— (1) shall be focused on improving the understanding, awareness, and utilization of innovative products for construction systems with increased benefits relating to— (A) construction speed; (B) anti-terrorism force protection; (C) lateral wind, seismic activity, and fire performance standards; (D) designs that factor in military installation resilience and protection against extreme weather events; (E) life-cycle cost effectiveness and sustainability; (F) renewability; and (G) carbon sequestration; and (2) shall include instruction relating to— (A) all sustainable building materials, such as innovative wood products and mass timber systems; and (B) designs to improve military installation resilience using projection data against extreme weather events. (c) Availability and update The Secretary shall ensure that— (1) the continuing education curriculum required under subsection (a) is made available to each element of the military construction community not later than 60 days after completion of the curriculum; and (2) such curriculum is updated whenever a new construction material is approved by the Unified Facilities Criteria of the Department. (d) Academia input In developing the continuing education curriculum required under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with academic institutions. (e) Timing Not later than January 1, 2025, the Secretary shall ensure that— (1) not less than 75 percent of the workforce described in subsection (a) has completed the first iteration of the continuing education curriculum required under such subsection; and (2) such workforce receives updated information on innovative construction techniques on a continuing basis. (f) Report Not later than June 1, 2024, the Secretary shall submit to appropriate committees of Congress a report containing an update on the status of the continuing education curriculum required under subsection (a). (g) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate committees of Congress The term appropriate committees of Congress (A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Subcommittee on Military Construction, Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies of the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Subcommittee on Military Construction, Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. (2) Military installation resilience The term military installation resilience 2879. Guidance on Department of Defense-wide standards for access to installations of the Department (a) Interim guidance Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall promulgate interim guidance to the appropriate official or officials within the Department of Defense for purposes of establishing final standards of the Department for fitness of individuals for access to installations of the Department, which shall include modifying Department of Defense Manual 5200.08, Physical Security Program: Access to DoD Installations (b) Final guidance Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall promulgate final guidance described in subsection (a). (c) Briefing Not later than 60 days after promulgating interim guidance required under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate the House of Representatives on such guidance, which shall include a timeline for promulgation of final guidance as required under subsection (b). 2880. Deployment of existing construction materials (a) Plan Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a plan to utilize, transfer, or donate to States on the southern border of the United States all existing excess border wall construction materials, including bollards, for constructing a permanent physical barrier to stop illicit human and vehicle traffic along the border of the United States with Mexico. (b) Execution of plan Not later than 15 days after submitting to Congress the plan required under subsection (a), taking into account ongoing audits being conducted by the Defense Contract Audit Agency and ongoing construction contract negotiations by the Army Corps of Engineers, so long as any ongoing audits or construction contract negotiations are not a cause for delay, the Secretary shall work with the Defense Logistics Agency to execute that plan until the Department of Defense is no longer incurring any costs to maintain, store, or protect the materials specified under such subsection. (c) Requirements of requesting States Any State requesting border wall construction materials made available under this section must certify, in writing, that the materials it accepts will be exclusively used for the construction of a permanent physical barrier along the border of the United States with Mexico. (d) Report Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report containing the following: (1) A detailed description of the decision process of the Secretary to forgo the excess property disposal process of the Department of Defense and instead pay to store border wall panels. (2) A list of entities the Department is paying for use of their privately owned land to store unused border wall construction materials, with appropriate action taken to protect personally identifiable information, such as by making the list of entities available in an annex that is labeled as controlled unclassified information. (3) An explanation of the process through which the Department contracted with private landowners to store unused border wall construction materials, including whether there was a competitive contracting process and whether the landowners have instituted an inventory review system. (4) A description of any investigations by the Inspector General of the Department that have been opened related to storing border wall construction materials. 2881. Technical corrections (a) Numu Newe Special Management Area Section 2902(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( 16 U.S.C. 460gggg(c) 217,845 209,181 (b) Reduction of impact of Fallon Range Training Complex modernization Section 2995(a)(3)(A) of the Military Land Withdrawals Act of 2013 (title XXIX of Public Law 113–66 Public Law 117–263 Gas Basin C Department of Energy national security authorizations and other authorizations XXXI Department of Energy national security programs A National security programs and authorizations 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2024 for the activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701. (b) Authorization of new plant projects From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new plant projects for the National Nuclear Security Administration as follows: Project 24–D–513, Z-Pinch Experimental Underground System Test Bed Facilities Improvement, Nevada National Security Site, Nye County, Nevada, $80,000,000. Project 24–D–512, TA-46 Protective Force Facility, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, $48,500,000. Project 24–D–511, Plutonium Production Building, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, $48,500,000. Project 24–D–510, Analytic Gas Laboratory, Pantex Plant, Panhandle, Texas, $35,000,000. Project 24–D–530, Naval Reactors Facility Medical Science Complex, Idaho Falls, Idaho, $36,584,000. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2024 for defense environmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701. (b) Authorization of new plant projects From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out, for defense environmental cleanup activities, the following new plant projects: Project 24–D–401, Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility Super Cell 11 Expansion Project, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington, $1,000,000. 3103. Other defense activities Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2024 for other defense activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701. 3104. Nuclear energy Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2024 for nuclear energy as specified in the funding table in section 4701. B Program authorizations, restrictions, and limitations 3111. Limitation on use of funds for naval nuclear fuel systems based on low-enriched uranium None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2024 for the National Nuclear Security Administration for the purpose of conducting research and development of an advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium may be obligated or expended until the following determinations are submitted to the congressional defense committees: (1) A determination made jointly by the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of Defense with respect to whether the determination made jointly by the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of the Navy pursuant to section 3118(c)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( Public Law 114–92 (2) A determination by the Secretary of the Navy with respect to whether an advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium can be produced that would not reduce vessel capability, increase expense, or reduce operational availability as a result of refueling requirements. 3112. Prohibition on ARIES expansion before realization of 30 pit per year base capability Section 4219 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2538a (a) redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and (b) inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f): (f) Prohibition on ARIES expansion before realization of 30 pit per year base capability (1) In general Unless the Administrator certifies to the congressional defense committees that the base capability to produce 30 plutonium pits per year has been established at Los Alamos National Laboratory, the Advanced Recovery and Integrated Extraction System (commonly known as ARIES PF–4 (2) Exceptions Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to— (A) the planning and design of an additional ARIES capability; or (B) the transfer of the ARIES capability to a location other than PF–4. . 3113. Plutonium Modernization Program management Section 4219 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2538a (h) Not later than 570 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall ensure that the plutonium modernization program established by the Office of Defense Programs of the National Nuclear Security Administration, or any subsequently developed program designed to meet the requirements under subsection (a), is managed in accordance with the requirements of the Enhanced Management A program management category described in the execution instruction of the Office of Defense Programs entitled DP Program Execution Instruction: NA-10 Program Management Tools and Processes . 3114. Pantex explosives manufacturing capability Subtitle A of title XLII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2521 et seq. 4225. Pantex explosives manufacturing capability (a) In general Not later than the date on which the W87–1 modification program enters into phase 6.5 of the joint nuclear weapons life cycle process (as defined in section 4220), the Administrator shall establish at the Pantex Plant a conventional high explosives production capability with sufficient capacity to support full rate production of the main explosives used for the W87–1 warhead. (b) Briefing On the day after the date that the budget of the President is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2025 and each fiscal year thereafter, the Administrator shall brief the congressional defense committees on the progress of the Administration in achieving the capability described in subsection (a). (c) Termination Subsection (b) shall terminate upon the date that the Administrator certifies to the congressional defense committees that the capability described in subsection (a) has been achieved. . 3115. Limitation on establishing an enduring bioassurance program within the National Nuclear Security Administration (a) In general Subtitle B of title XLVIII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2791 et seq. 4815. Limitation on establishing an enduring bioassurance program within the Administration (a) In general The Administrator may not establish a program within the Administration for the purposes of executing an enduring national security research and development effort to broaden the role of the Department of Energy in national biodefense. (b) Rule of construction The limitation described in subsection (a) shall not be interpreted— (1) to prohibit the establishment of a bioassurance program for the purpose of executing enduring national security research and development in any component of the Department of Energy other than the Administration or in any other Federal agency; or (2) to impede the use of resources of the Administration, including resources provided by a national security laboratory or a nuclear weapons production facility site, to support the execution of a bioassurance program, if such support is provided— (A) on a cost-reimbursable basis to an entity that is not a component of the Department of Energy; and (B) in a manner that does not interfere with mission of such laboratory or facility. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4814 the following new item: Sec. 4815. Limitation on establishing an enduring bioassurance program within the Administration. . 3116. Extension of authority on acceptance of contributions for acceleration or removal or security of fissile materials, radiological materials, and related equipment at vulnerable sites worldwide Section 4306B(f)(6) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2569(f)(6) 2028 2033 3117. Modification of reporting requirements for program on vulnerable sites (a) In general Section 4306B of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2569 (1) by striking subsection (d); (2) by redesignating subsections (e), (f), and (g) as subsections (d), (e), and (f), respectively; and (3) in paragraph (6) of subsection (e), as so redesignated, by striking 2028 2030 (b) Conforming amendment Section 4309(c)(7) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2575(c)(7) section 3132(f) of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 ( 50 U.S.C. 2569(f) section 4306B(e) 3118. Implementation of enhanced mission delivery initiative (a) In general Concurrent with the submission of the budget of the President to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029, the Administrator for Nuclear Security, acting through the Director for Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation, shall brief the congressional defense committees on the status of implementing the 18 principal recommendations and associated subelements of the report entitled Evolving the Nuclear Security Enterprise: A Report of the Enhanced Mission Delivery Initiative (b) Elements of briefings Each briefing required by subsection (a) shall address— (1) the status of implementing each recommendation described in subsection (a); (2) with respect to each recommendation that has been implemented, whether the outcome of such implementation is achieving the desired result; (3) with respect to each recommendation that has not been implemented, the reason for not implementing such recommendation; (4) whether additional legislation is required in order to implement a recommendation; and (5) such other matters as the Administrator considers necessary. 3119. Limitation on use of funds until provision of spend plan for W80-4 ALT weapon development Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2024 for operations of the Office of the Administrator for Nuclear Security, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Administrator for Nuclear Security submits to the congressional defense committees the spend plan for the warhead associated with the sea-launched cruise missile required by section 1642(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 ( Public Law 117–263 3120. Analyses of nuclear programs of foreign countries (a) Capability to conduct analyses of nuclear programs The Secretary of Energy shall, using existing authorities of the Secretary, take such actions as are necessary to improve the ability of the Department of Energy to conduct comprehensive, integrated analyses of the nuclear programs of foreign countries. (b) Additional analyses required The Secretary shall conduct analyses of— (1) countries that may pursue nuclear weapons programs in the future; (2) developing technologies that make it easier for the governments of countries or for non-state actors to acquire nuclear weapons; and (3) entities that may be developing the ability to supply sensitive nuclear technologies but may not yet have effective programs in place to ensure compliance with export controls. 3121. Enhancing National Nuclear Security Administration supply chain reliability (a) In general Subtitle A of title XLVIII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2781 et seq. 4808. Supply chain reliability assurance program The Administrator shall establish a supply chain reliability assurance program— (1) to facilitate collaboration with the Department of Defense and industrial partners to maintain a reliable domestic supplier base for critical materials to meet engineering and performance requirements of the Administration and the Department of Defense; and (2) to improve coordination with the Infrastructure and Operations Program and the Programmatic Recapitalization Working Group to improve planning for material requirements and potential disruptions to commercial or contractor supply chains, including with respect to— (A) assisting in coordination for forecasting future needs in both legacy inventories and new procurements; (B) establishing clear requirements for nuclear security enterprise assurance and, when cost-effective, to use capabilities of the Administration to restore mission schedules at risk; and (C) collaborating with the Department of Defense and industrial partners to establish processes to mitigate manufacturing challenges and to develop strategies to lower long-term costs, while identifying and preserving production of materials and components by the Administration. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4807 the following new item: Sec. 4808. Supply chain reliability assurance program. . 3122. Transfer of cybersecurity responsibilities to Administrator for Nuclear Security The National Nuclear Security Administration Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2401 et seq. (1) in section 3212(b) ( 50 U.S.C. 2402(b) (20) Information resources management, including cybersecurity. ; and (2) in section 3232(b)(3)( 50 U.S.C. 2422(b)(3) and cyber 3123. Redesignating duties related to departmental radiological and nuclear incident responses (a) Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs Section 3214(b) of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2404 (b)) is amended by striking paragraph (3). (b) Administrator for Nuclear Security Section 3212(b)(7) of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2402(b)(7) and Nuclear Emergency Support Team capabilities, including all field-deployed and remote technical support to public health and safety missions, countering weapons of mass destruction operations, technical and operational nuclear forensics, and responses to United States nuclear weapon accidents management 3124. Modification of authority to establish certain contracting, program management, scientific, engineering, and technical positions Section 3241 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2441 800 1,200 3125. Technical amendments to the Atomic Energy Defense Act The Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2501 et seq. (1) in section 4306(d)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking Not later than March 15, 2005, the The (B) in paragraph (2), by striking Not later than January 1, 2006, the The (2) in section 4807(f)(1), by striking 2022 2030 3126. Amendment to period for briefing requirements Section 4807(f)(1) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2787(f)(1) 2022 2032 3127. Repeal of reporting requirements for Uranium Capabilities Replacement Project Section 3123(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 ( Public Law 112–239 C Budget and financial management matters 3131. Updated financial integration policy Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall issue an updated financial integration policy, which shall include the following: (1) Updated responsibilities for offices of the National Nuclear Security Administration and requirements for management and operating contractors, including contractors at sites that are not sites of the Administration. (2) Guidance for how offices of the Administration should use common financial data, including guidance requiring that such data be used as the primary source of financial data by program offices, to the extent practicable. (3) Processes recommended by the Government Accountability Office to improve financial integration efforts of the Administration, including an internal process to verify how management and operating contractors crosswalk data from their systems to the appropriate work breakdown structure of the Administration and apply common cost element definitions. (4) Any other matters the Administrator considers appropriate. D Other matters 3141. Integration of technical expertise of Department of Energy into policymaking The Secretary of Energy shall take such measures as are necessary to improve the integration of the scientific and technical expertise of the Department of Energy, especially the expertise of the national laboratories, into policymaking, including by— (1) ensuring that such expertise is involved during interagency discussions, regardless of the topic of such discussions; (2) decreasing restrictions on personnel of laboratories and other facilities of the Department working in the Department headquarters for 2- to 3-year rotations; (3) increasing collaboration among program managers and personnel of laboratories and other facilities of the Department during policy deliberations; and (4) creating mechanisms for providing technical advice to officials of the Department responsible for nonproliferation policy. XXXII Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 3201. Authorization There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2024, $47,230,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 ( 42 U.S.C. 2286 et seq. XXXV Maritime Administration 3501. Maritime Administration Section 109 of title 49, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 109. Maritime Administration (a) Organization and mission The Maritime Administration is an administration in the Department of Transportation. The mission of the Maritime Administration is to foster, promote, and develop the merchant maritime industry of the United States. (b) Maritime Administrator The head of the Maritime Administration is the Maritime Administrator, who is appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Administrator shall report directly to the Secretary of Transportation and carry out the duties prescribed by the Secretary. (c) Deputy Maritime Administrator The Maritime Administration shall have a Deputy Maritime Administrator, who is appointed in the competitive service by the Secretary, after consultation with the Administrator. The Deputy Administrator shall carry out the duties prescribed by the Administrator. The Deputy Administrator shall be Acting Administrator during the absence or disability of the Administrator and, unless the Secretary designates another individual, during a vacancy in the office of Administrator. (d) Duties and powers vested in Secretary All duties and powers of the Maritime Administration are vested in the Secretary. (e) Regional offices The Maritime Administration shall have regional offices for the Atlantic, Gulf, Great Lakes, and Pacific port ranges, and may have other regional offices as necessary. The Secretary shall appoint a qualified individual as Director of each regional office. The Secretary shall carry out appropriate activities and programs of the Maritime Administration through the regional offices. (f) Interagency and industry relations The Secretary shall establish and maintain liaison with other agencies, and with representative trade organizations throughout the United States, concerned with the transportation of commodities by water in the export and import foreign commerce of the United States, for the purpose of securing preference to vessels of the United States for the transportation of those commodities. (g) Detailing officers from Armed Forces To assist the Secretary in carrying out duties and powers relating to the Maritime Administration, not more than five officers of the Armed Forces may be detailed to the Secretary at any one time, in addition to details authorized by any other law. During the period of a detail, the Secretary shall pay the officer an amount that, when added to the officer's pay and allowances as an officer in the Armed Forces, makes the officer's total pay and allowances equal to the amount that would be paid to an individual performing work the Secretary considers to be of similar importance, difficulty, and responsibility as that performed by the officer during the detail. (h) Contracts, cooperative agreements, and audits (1) Contracts and cooperative agreements In the same manner that a private corporation may make a contract within the scope of its authority under its charter, the Secretary may make contracts and cooperative agreements for the United States Government and disburse amounts to— (A) carry out the Secretary's duties and powers under this section, subtitle V of title 46, and all other Maritime Administration programs; and (B) protect, preserve, and improve collateral held by the Secretary to secure indebtedness. (2) Audits The financial transactions of the Secretary under paragraph (1) shall be audited by the Comptroller General. The Comptroller General shall allow credit for an expenditure shown to be necessary because of the nature of the business activities authorized by this section or subtitle V of title 46. At least once a year, the Comptroller General shall report to Congress any departure by the Secretary from this section or subtitle V of title 46. (i) Grant administrative expenses Except as otherwise provided by law, the administrative and related expenses for the administration of any grant programs by the Maritime Administrator may not exceed 3 percent. (j) Authorization of appropriations (1) In general Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, there are authorized to be appropriated such amounts as may be necessary to carry out the duties and powers of the Secretary relating to the Maritime Administration. (2) Limitations Only those amounts specifically authorized by law may be appropriated for the use of the Maritime Administration for— (A) acquisition, construction, or reconstruction of vessels; (B) construction-differential subsidies incident to the construction, reconstruction, or reconditioning of vessels; (C) costs of national defense features; (D) payments of obligations incurred for operating-differential subsidies; (E) expenses necessary for research and development activities, including reimbursement of the Vessel Operations Revolving Fund for losses resulting from expenses of experimental vessel operations; (F) the Vessel Operations Revolving Fund; (G) National Defense Reserve Fleet expenses; (H) expenses necessary to carry out part B of subtitle V of title 46; and (I) other operations and training expenses related to the development of waterborne transportation systems, the use of waterborne transportation systems, and general administration. . D Funding Tables 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables (a) In general Whenever a funding table in this division specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program, or activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified dollar amount for the project, program, or activity is hereby authorized, subject to the availability of appropriations. (b) Merit-based decisions A decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of a dollar amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall— (1) be based on merit-based selection procedures in accordance with the requirements of sections 3201 and 4024 of title 10, United States Code, or on competitive procedures; and (2) comply with other applicable provisions of law. (c) Relationship to transfer and programming authority An amount specified in the funding tables in this division may be transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer or reprogramming authority provided by another provision of this Act or by other law. The transfer or reprogramming of an amount specified in such funding tables shall not count against a ceiling on such transfers or reprogrammings under section 1001 of this Act or any other provision of law, unless such transfer or reprogramming would move funds between appropriation accounts. (d) Applicability to classified annex This section applies to any classified annex that accompanies this Act. (e) Oral or written communications No oral or written communication concerning any amount specified in the funding tables in this division shall supersede the requirements of this section. XLI PROCUREMENT 4101. PROCUREMENT SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT Line Item FY 2024 Senate AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY FIXED WING 3 FUTURE UAS FAMILY 53,453 53,453 5 SMALL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS 20,769 20,769 ROTARY 6 AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN 718,578 718,578 7 AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN 110,360 110,360 8 UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) 668,258 668,258 9 UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) 92,494 92,494 10 UH–60 BLACK HAWK L AND V MODELS 153,196 153,196 11 CH–47 HELICOPTER 202,487 202,487 12 CH–47 HELICOPTER 18,936 18,936 MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 13 MQ–1 PAYLOAD 13,650 13,650 14 GRAY EAGLE MODS2 14,959 14,959 16 AH–64 MODS 113,127 113,127 17 CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP) 20,689 20,689 22 UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS 35,879 35,879 23 NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN 32,418 32,418 24 COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE 74,912 74,912 25 DEGRADED VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 16,838 16,838 26 AVIATION ASSURED PNT 67,383 67,383 27 GATM ROLLUP 8,924 8,924 29 UAS MODS 2,258 2,258 GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS 30 AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT 161,731 161,731 31 SURVIVABILITY CM 6,526 6,526 32 CMWS 72,041 72,041 33 COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) 261,384 261,384 OTHER SUPPORT 34 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT 25,752 25,752 35 AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS 22,097 22,097 36 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 21,216 21,216 37 LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET 2,125 2,125 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY 3,012,440 3,012,440 MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM 1 LOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AMD) SEN 6,625 6,625 3 M-SHORAD—PROCUREMENT 400,697 400,697 4 MSE MISSILE 1,212,832 1,212,832 6 PRECISION STRIKE MISSILE (PRSM) 384,071 384,071 7 INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INC 2–I 313,189 313,189 8 MID-RANGE CAPABILITY (MRC) 169,519 169,519 AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 9 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY 21,976 21,976 10 JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MSLS (JAGM) 303,409 303,409 12 LONG-RANGE HYPERSONIC WEAPON 156,821 156,821 ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS 13 JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY 199,509 199,509 14 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY 120,475 120,475 15 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) 886,367 886,367 16 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) 55,913 55,913 17 MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR) 10,334 10,334 18 HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM (HIMARS 179,230 179,230 19 ARMY TACTICAL MSL SYS (ATACMS)—SYS SUM 7,307 7,307 MODIFICATIONS 21 PATRIOT MODS 212,247 212,247 22 STINGER MODS 36,484 36,484 23 AVENGER MODS 22,274 22,274 25 MLRS MODS 168,198 168,198 26 HIMARS MODIFICATIONS 76,266 76,266 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 27 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 6,573 6,573 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 28 AIR DEFENSE TARGETS 11,701 11,701 TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY 4,962,017 4,962,017 PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 1 ARMORED MULTI PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV) 554,777 554,777 3 MOBILE PROTECTED FIREPOWER 394,635 394,635 MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 4 STRYKER UPGRADE 614,282 614,282 5 BRADLEY FIRE SUPPORT TEAM (BFIST) VEHICLE 5,232 5,232 6 BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD) 158,274 158,274 7 M109 FOV MODIFICATIONS 90,986 90,986 8 PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM) 469,152 469,152 9 IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88 HERCULES) 41,058 41,058 12 JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE 159,804 159,804 13 ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM 697,883 697,883 14 ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM 102,440 102,440 WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES 16 PERSONAL DEFENSE WEAPON (ROLL) 510 510 17 M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN (7.62MM) 425 425 19 MACHINE GUN, CAL .50 M2 ROLL 3,420 3,420 20 MORTAR SYSTEMS 8,013 8,013 21 LOCATION & AZIMUTH DETERMINATION SYSTEM (LADS 3,174 3,174 22 XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM) 14,143 14,143 23 PRECISION SNIPER RIFLE 5,248 5,248 24 CARBINE 571 571 25 NEXT GENERATION SQUAD WEAPON 292,850 292,850 26 HANDGUN 32 32 MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH 28 M777 MODS 18,920 18,920 31 M119 MODIFICATIONS 13,097 13,097 32 MORTAR MODIFICATION 423 423 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 33 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) 1,148 1,148 34 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV) 115,024 115,024 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY 3,765,521 3,765,521 PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 1 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES 90,853 90,853 2 CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES 65,370 65,370 3 NEXT GENERATION SQUAD WEAPON AMMUNITION 191,244 191,244 4 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES 6,597 6,597 5 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES 41,534 41,534 6 CTG, 20MM, ALL TYPES 7,925 7,925 7 CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES 38,760 38,760 8 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES 107,805 107,805 9 CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES 148,970 148,970 10 CTG, 50MM, ALL TYPES 28,000 28,000 MORTAR AMMUNITION 11 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES 35,160 35,160 12 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES 40,562 40,562 13 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES 106,784 106,784 TANK AMMUNITION 14 CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES 300,368 300,368 ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 15 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES 21,298 21,298 16 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES 150,839 150,839 18 PRECISION ARTILLERY MUNITIONS 96,406 96,406 19 ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL 172,947 172,947 MINES 20 MINES & CLEARING CHARGES, ALL TYPES 71,182 71,182 21 CLOSE TERRAIN SHAPING OBSTACLE 55,374 55,374 ROCKETS 22 SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES 18,630 18,630 23 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES 87,293 87,293 OTHER AMMUNITION 24 CAD/PAD, ALL TYPES 6,564 6,564 25 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES 24,238 24,238 26 GRENADES, ALL TYPES 48,374 48,374 27 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES 23,252 23,252 28 SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES 11,309 11,309 MISCELLANEOUS 30 AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES 3,976 3,976 31 NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES 3,281 3,281 32 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO) 17,436 17,436 33 AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT 13,133 13,133 34 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO) 18,068 18,068 35 CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES 102 102 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT 36 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 726,135 726,135 37 CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION 183,752 183,752 38 ARMS INITIATIVE 4,057 4,057 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY 2,967,578 2,967,578 OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY TACTICAL VEHICLES 1 SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED: 22,751 22,751 2 SEMITRAILERS, TANKERS 40,359 40,359 3 HI MOB MULTI-PURP WHLD VEH (HMMWV) 25,904 25,904 4 GROUND MOBILITY VEHICLES (GMV) 36,223 36,223 6 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE FAMILY OF VEHICL 839,413 839,413 7 TRUCK, DUMP, 20T (CCE) 20,075 20,075 8 FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) 110,734 110,734 9 FAMILY OF COLD WEATHER ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE (C 28,745 28,745 10 FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIP 55,340 55,340 11 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) 66,428 66,428 12 PLS ESP 51,868 51,868 14 TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS 3,792 3,792 15 MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP 80,326 80,326 NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES 16 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 2,203 2,203 17 NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER 8,246 8,246 COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS 18 SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 161,585 161,585 19 TACTICAL NETWORK TECHNOLOGY MOD IN SVC 358,646 358,646 20 DISASTER INCIDENT RESPONSE COMMS TERMINAL (DI 254 254 21 JCSE EQUIPMENT (USRDECOM) 5,097 5,097 COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 24 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS 101,181 101,181 25 TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS 54,849 54,849 26 SHF TERM 41,634 41,634 27 ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING 202,370 202,370 28 EHF SATELLITE COMMUNICATION 19,122 19,122 30 GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS 531 531 COMM—C3 SYSTEM 31 COE TACTICAL SERVER INFRASTRUCTURE (TSI) 77,999 77,999 COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 32 HANDHELD MANPACK SMALL FORM FIT (HMS) 765,109 765,109 33 ARMY LINK 16 SYSTEMS 60,767 60,767 35 UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE 18,999 18,999 36 COTS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 492,001 492,001 37 FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE 1,374 1,374 38 ARMY COMMUNICATIONS & ELECTRONICS 52,485 52,485 COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM 39 CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE-INTEL 16,767 16,767 41 MULTI-DOMAIN INTELLIGENCE 119,989 119,989 INFORMATION SECURITY 42 INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP 701 701 43 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC) 159,712 159,712 44 DEFENSIVE CYBER OPERATIONS 13,848 13,848 45 INSIDER THREAT PROGRAM—UNIT ACTIVITY MONITO 1,502 1,502 47 BIOMETRIC ENABLING CAPABILITY (BEC) 453 453 COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS 49 BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS 23,278 23,278 COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS 50 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 32,608 32,608 51 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 4,949 4,949 52 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM 243,011 243,011 ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 55 JTT/CIBS-M 8,543 8,543 56 TERRESTRIAL LAYER SYSTEMS (TLS) 85,486 85,486 58 DCGS-A-INTEL 2,980 2,980 60 TROJAN 30,649 30,649 61 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) 4,169 4,169 62 BIOMETRIC TACTICAL COLLECTION DEVICES 932 932 ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 63 EW PLANNING & MANAGEMENT TOOLS (EWPMT) 21,278 21,278 64 AIR VIGILANCE (AV) 6,641 6,641 65 MULTI-FUNCTION ELECTRONIC WARFARE (MFEW) SYST 15,941 15,941 67 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES 22,833 22,833 68 CI MODERNIZATION 434 434 ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) 69 SENTINEL MODS 161,886 161,886 70 NIGHT VISION DEVICES 141,143 141,143 71 SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF 15,484 15,484 73 FAMILY OF WEAPON SIGHTS (FWS) 185,634 185,634 74 ENHANCED PORTABLE INDUCTIVE ARTILLERY FUZE SE 3,652 3,652 75 FORWARD LOOKING INFRARED (IFLIR) 20,438 20,438 76 COUNTER SMALL UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM (C-SUAS) 365,376 365,376 77 JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P) 215,290 215,290 78 JOINT EFFECTS TARGETING SYSTEM (JETS) 8,932 8,932 79 COMPUTER BALLISTICS: LHMBC XM32 2,965 2,965 80 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM 8,024 8,024 81 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEMS MODIFICATIONS 7,399 7,399 82 COUNTERFIRE RADARS 99,782 99,782 ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS 83 ARMY COMMAND POST INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE ( 78,512 78,512 84 FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY 10,052 10,052 85 AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS 68,892 68,892 86 IAMD BATTLE COMMAND SYSTEM 412,556 412,556 87 LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS) 4,270 4,270 88 NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE 37,194 37,194 89 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A) 1,987 1,987 90 INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPP 5,318 5,318 91 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (ENFIRE) 4,997 4,997 ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION 92 ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION 10,130 10,130 93 AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP 61,489 61,489 94 ACCESSIONS INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (AIE) 4,198 4,198 96 HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PGM (HPCMP) 76,053 76,053 97 CONTRACT WRITING SYSTEM 6,061 6,061 98 CSS COMMUNICATIONS 56,804 56,804 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 1,781 1,781 CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT 102 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) 70,781 70,781 103 CBRN DEFENSE 63,198 63,198 BRIDGING EQUIPMENT 104 TACTICAL BRIDGING 1,157 1,157 105 TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON 82,228 82,228 106 BRIDGE SUPPLEMENTAL SET 4,414 4,414 ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT 110 ROBOTICS AND APPLIQUE SYSTEMS 68,893 68,893 112 FAMILY OF BOATS AND MOTORS 4,785 4,785 COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 113 HEATERS AND ECU'S 7,617 7,617 115 PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) 5,356 5,356 116 GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM 167,129 167,129 117 MOBILE SOLDIER POWER 15,967 15,967 118 FORCE PROVIDER 34,200 34,200 120 CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM 45,792 45,792 121 FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS 12,118 12,118 PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT 123 QUALITY SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT 2,507 2,507 124 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER 40,989 40,989 MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 125 COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL 86,829 86,829 MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 126 MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS 17,287 17,287 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 128 TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED 29,878 29,878 129 ALL TERRAIN CRANES 27,725 27,725 131 FAMILY OF DIVER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 1,811 1,811 132 CONST EQUIP ESP 8,898 8,898 RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT 133 ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP 30,592 30,592 134 MANEUVER SUPPORT VESSEL (MSV) 149,449 149,449 GENERATORS 136 GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP 78,364 78,364 137 TACTICAL ELECTRIC POWER RECAPITALIZATION 11,088 11,088 MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT 138 FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS 12,982 12,982 TRAINING EQUIPMENT 139 COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT 56,619 56,619 140 TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM 226,379 226,379 141 SYNTHETIC TRAINING ENVIRONMENT (STE) 234,965 234,965 142 GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING 9,698 9,698 TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD) 143 INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE) 36,149 36,149 144 TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD) 32,623 32,623 OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 145 PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) 132,739 132,739 146 BASE LEVEL COMMON EQUIPMENT 34,460 34,460 147 MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3) 35,239 35,239 148 BUILDING, PRE-FAB, RELOCATABLE 31,011 31,011 149 SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR TEST AND EVALUATION 52,481 52,481 OPA2 151 INITIAL SPARES—C&E 9,169 9,169 TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY 8,672,979 8,672,979 AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY COMBAT AIRCRAFT 1 F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET 41,329 41,329 2 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV 2,410,569 2,410,569 3 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV 189,425 189,425 4 JSF STOVL 2,126,317 2,126,317 5 JSF STOVL 193,125 193,125 6 CH–53K (HEAVY LIFT) 1,698,050 1,698,050 7 CH–53K (HEAVY LIFT) 456,567 456,567 8 V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) 27,216 27,216 9 H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z) 4,292 4,292 10 P–8A POSEIDON 31,257 31,257 11 E–2D ADV HAWKEYE 182,817 182,817 TRAINER AIRCRAFT 13 MULTI-ENGINE TRAINING SYSTEM (METS) 289,141 289,141 OTHER AIRCRAFT 15 KC–130J 241,291 241,291 17 MQ–4 TRITON 416,010 416,010 19 MQ–8 UAV 1,546 1,546 21 MQ–25 545,697 545,697 22 MQ–25 50,576 50,576 23 MARINE GROUP 5 UAS 89,563 89,563 MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 24 F–18 A-D UNIQUE 116,551 116,551 25 F–18E/F AND EA–18G MODERNIZATION AND SUSTAINM 605,416 605,416 26 MARINE GROUP 5 UAS SERIES 98,063 98,063 27 AEA SYSTEMS 24,110 24,110 28 AV–8 SERIES 22,829 22,829 29 INFRARED SEARCH AND TRACK (IRST) 179,193 179,193 30 ADVERSARY 69,336 69,336 31 F–18 SERIES 640,236 640,236 32 H–53 SERIES 41,414 41,414 33 MH–60 SERIES 106,495 106,495 34 H–1 SERIES 114,284 114,284 35 EP–3 SERIES 8,548 8,548 36 E–2 SERIES 183,246 183,246 37 TRAINER A/C SERIES 16,376 16,376 39 C–130 SERIES 198,220 198,220 40 FEWSG 651 651 41 CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES 13,930 13,930 42 E–6 SERIES 164,571 164,571 43 EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES 60,498 60,498 44 T–45 SERIES 170,357 170,357 45 POWER PLANT CHANGES 21,079 21,079 46 JPATS SERIES 28,005 28,005 48 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT 53,614 53,614 49 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES 136,199 136,199 50 COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM 6,585 6,585 51 ID SYSTEMS 13,085 13,085 52 P–8 SERIES 316,168 316,168 53 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION 24,901 24,901 54 MQ–8 SERIES 14,700 14,700 55 V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY 215,997 215,997 56 NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) 426,396 426,396 57 F–35 STOVL SERIES 311,921 311,921 58 F–35 CV SERIES 166,909 166,909 59 QRC 28,206 28,206 60 MQ–4 SERIES 93,951 93,951 AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 62 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 2,451,244 2,451,244 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES 63 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT 566,156 566,156 64 AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 133,815 133,815 65 WAR CONSUMABLES 44,632 44,632 66 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 49,907 49,907 67 SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 404,178 404,178 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY 17,336,760 17,336,760 WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 1 CONVENTIONAL PROMPT STRIKE 341,434 341,434 2 TRIDENT II MODS 1,284,705 1,284,705 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 3 MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 7,954 7,954 STRATEGIC MISSILES 4 TOMAHAWK 72,908 72,908 TACTICAL MISSILES 5 AMRAAM 439,153 439,153 6 SIDEWINDER 78,165 78,165 7 STANDARD MISSILE 969,525 969,525 8 STANDARD MISSILE 227,320 227,320 9 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB II 65,863 65,863 10 RAM 114,896 114,896 11 JOINT AIR GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) 79,292 79,292 12 HELLFIRE 6,923 6,923 13 AERIAL TARGETS 176,588 176,588 14 OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT 3,687 3,687 15 LRASM 639,636 639,636 16 NAVAL STRIKE MISSILE (NSM) 29,925 29,925 17 NAVAL STRIKE MISSILE (NSM) 5,755 5,755 MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 18 TOMAHAWK MODS 540,944 540,944 19 ESSM 290,129 290,129 20 AARGM-ER 162,429 162,429 21 AARGM-ER 33,273 33,273 22 STANDARD MISSILES MODS 89,255 89,255 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 23 WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 2,037 2,037 ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 25 ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 208,154 208,154 TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 26 SSTD 4,830 4,830 27 MK–48 TORPEDO 308,497 308,497 28 ASW TARGETS 14,817 14,817 MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 29 MK–54 TORPEDO MODS 104,086 104,086 30 MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS 20,714 20,714 31 MARITIME MINES 58,800 58,800 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 32 TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 133,187 133,187 33 ASW RANGE SUPPORT 4,146 4,146 DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 34 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 5,811 5,811 GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 35 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS 14,165 14,165 MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 36 CIWS MODS 4,088 4,088 37 COAST GUARD WEAPONS 55,172 55,172 38 GUN MOUNT MODS 82,682 82,682 39 LCS MODULE WEAPONS 3,264 3,264 40 AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS 14,357 14,357 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 42 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 177,819 177,819 TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY 6,876,385 6,876,385 PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC NAVY AMMUNITION 1 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 43,519 43,519 2 JDAM 73,689 73,689 3 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES 67,423 67,423 4 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION 11,862 11,862 5 PRACTICE BOMBS 52,481 52,481 6 CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES 72,426 72,426 7 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES 104,529 104,529 8 JATOS 7,433 7,433 9 5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION 30,871 30,871 10 INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION 41,261 41,261 11 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION 44,044 44,044 12 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO 48,478 48,478 13 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION 9,521 9,521 14 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION 1,679 1,679 15 EXPEDITIONARY LOITERING MUNITIONS 249,575 249,575 MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION 16 MORTARS 61,274 61,274 17 DIRECT SUPPORT MUNITIONS 73,338 73,338 18 INFANTRY WEAPONS AMMUNITION 178,240 178,240 19 COMBAT SUPPORT MUNITIONS 15,897 15,897 20 AMMO MODERNIZATION 17,941 17,941 21 ARTILLERY MUNITIONS 82,452 82,452 22 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 5,340 5,340 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC 1,293,273 1,293,273 SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE SHIPS 1 OHIO REPLACEMENT SUBMARINE 2,443,598 2,443,598 2 OHIO REPLACEMENT SUBMARINE 3,390,734 3,390,734 OTHER WARSHIPS 3 CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1,115,296 1,115,296 4 CVN–81 800,492 800,492 5 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE 7,129,965 7,129,965 6 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE 3,215,539 3,215,539 8 CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS 817,646 817,646 9 DDG 1000 410,400 410,400 10 DDG–51 4,199,179 4,199,179 11 DDG–51 284,035 284,035 13 FFG-FRIGATE 2,173,698 2,173,698 AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS 14 LPD FLIGHT II 0 1,863,000 Program increase for LPD–33—USMC UFR [1,863,000] 18 LHA REPLACEMENT 1,830,149 1,830,149 AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST 21 AS SUBMARINE TENDER 1,733,234 1,733,234 22 TAO FLEET OILER 815,420 815,420 25 LCU 1700 62,532 62,532 26 OUTFITTING 557,365 557,365 28 SERVICE CRAFT 63,815 63,815 29 AUXILIARY PERSONNEL LIGHTER 0 72,000 Additional APL–67 class berthing barge [72,000] 30 LCAC SLEP 15,286 15,286 31 AUXILIARY VESSELS (USED SEALIFT) 142,008 142,008 32 COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS 1,648,559 1,648,559 TOTAL SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY 32,848,950 34,783,950 OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT 1 SURFACE POWER EQUIPMENT 14,003 14,003 GENERATORS 2 SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E 105,441 105,441 NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT 3 OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT 110,286 110,286 OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT 4 SUB PERISCOPE, IMAGING AND SUPT EQUIP PROG 262,951 262,951 5 DDG MOD 628,532 628,532 6 FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT 34,782 34,782 7 COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD 2,458 2,458 8 LHA/LHD MIDLIFE 104,369 104,369 9 LCC 19/20 EXTENDED SERVICE LIFE PROGRAM 10,529 10,529 10 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT 23,272 23,272 11 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 112,526 112,526 12 VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 32,076 32,076 13 LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 18,832 18,832 14 SUBMARINE BATTERIES 28,221 28,221 15 LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 91,890 91,890 16 DDG 1000 CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 232,124 232,124 17 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP 25,058 25,058 18 DSSP EQUIPMENT 4,623 4,623 20 LCAC 10,794 10,794 21 UNDERWATER EOD EQUIPMENT 19,549 19,549 22 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 86,001 86,001 23 CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS 3,288 3,288 REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT 24 SHIP MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND MODERNIZATION 2,746,313 2,746,313 25 REACTOR POWER UNITS 2,016 2,016 26 REACTOR COMPONENTS 390,148 390,148 OCEAN ENGINEERING 27 DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT 18,086 18,086 SMALL BOATS 28 STANDARD BOATS 74,963 74,963 PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT 29 OPERATING FORCES IPE 187,495 187,495 OTHER SHIP SUPPORT 30 LCS COMMON MISSION MODULES EQUIPMENT 49,060 49,060 31 LCS MCM MISSION MODULES 93,961 93,961 33 LCS SUW MISSION MODULES 12,102 12,102 34 LCS IN-SERVICE MODERNIZATION 171,704 171,704 35 SMALL & MEDIUM UUV 61,951 61,951 LOGISTIC SUPPORT 36 LSD MIDLIFE & MODERNIZATION 7,594 7,594 SHIP SONARS 37 SPQ–9B RADAR 7,267 7,267 38 AN/SQQ–89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM 138,065 138,065 39 SSN ACOUSTIC EQUIPMENT 463,577 463,577 40 UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 23,452 23,452 ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 41 SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM 46,726 46,726 42 SSTD 14,560 14,560 43 FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM 420,069 420,069 44 SURTASS 33,910 33,910 ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT 45 AN/SLQ–32 329,513 329,513 RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT 46 SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT 379,230 379,230 47 AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS) 4,082 4,082 OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 48 COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY 37,677 37,677 49 NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS) 15,374 15,374 50 ATDLS 50,148 50,148 51 NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS) 3,918 3,918 52 MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT 16,814 16,814 54 NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE) 37,319 37,319 55 AMERICAN FORCES RADIO AND TV SERVICE 2,750 2,750 56 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP 6,437 6,437 AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 57 ASHORE ATC EQUIPMENT 89,237 89,237 58 AFLOAT ATC EQUIPMENT 90,487 90,487 59 ID SYSTEMS 59,234 59,234 60 JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEM ( 3,343 3,343 61 NAVAL MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS 39,180 39,180 OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 62 MARITIME INTEGRATED BROADCAST SYSTEM 6,994 6,994 63 TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS 52,026 52,026 64 DCGS-N 16,579 16,579 65 CANES 467,587 467,587 66 RADIAC 16,475 16,475 67 CANES-INTELL 48,207 48,207 68 GPETE 25,761 25,761 69 MASF 16,475 16,475 70 INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY 6,345 6,345 71 EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION 4,282 4,282 73 IN-SERVICE RADARS AND SENSORS 255,256 255,256 SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS 74 BATTLE FORCE TACTICAL NETWORK 74,180 74,180 75 SHIPBOARD TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS 29,776 29,776 76 SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION 96,916 96,916 77 COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M 14,107 14,107 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS 78 SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT 73,791 73,791 79 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 83,178 83,178 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 80 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 72,871 72,871 81 NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT) 37,921 37,921 SHORE COMMUNICATIONS 82 JOINT COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT ELEMENT (JCSE) 5,065 5,065 CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT 83 INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) 154,890 154,890 84 MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM 1,079 1,079 CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT 85 CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP 17,483 17,483 OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT 86 COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT 77,458 77,458 SONOBUOYS 88 SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES 311,177 311,177 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 89 MINOTAUR 5,396 5,396 90 WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 147,556 147,556 91 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 162,273 162,273 92 ADVANCED ARRESTING GEAR (AAG) 11,930 11,930 93 ELECTROMAGNETIC AIRCRAFT LAUNCH SYSTEM (EMALS 17,836 17,836 94 METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT 19,703 19,703 95 LEGACY AIRBORNE MCM 12,202 12,202 97 AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 82,115 82,115 98 UMCS-UNMAN CARRIER AVIATION(UCA)MISSION CNTRL 152,687 152,687 99 ARCHITECT & CAP FOR AUTONOMY IN NAV ENTER (AR 1,612 1,612 SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT 100 SHIP GUN SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 6,404 6,404 SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 101 HARPOON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 227 227 102 SHIP MISSILE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 294,511 294,511 103 TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 92,432 92,432 FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 104 STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP 325,318 325,318 ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 105 SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS 133,063 133,063 106 ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 27,469 27,469 OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 107 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP 27,864 27,864 108 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 6,171 6,171 OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE 109 ANTI-SHIP MISSILE DECOY SYSTEM 56,630 56,630 110 SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS 76,954 76,954 111 SURFACE TRAINING EQUIPMENT 209,487 209,487 CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 112 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 3,827 3,827 113 GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS 4,570 4,570 114 CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP 56,829 56,829 115 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 16,583 16,583 116 TACTICAL VEHICLES 24,236 24,236 117 AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT 4,504 4,504 118 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT 3,898 3,898 119 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 67,286 67,286 120 PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES 1,286 1,286 SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 121 SUPPLY EQUIPMENT 33,258 33,258 122 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 6,977 6,977 123 SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS 659,529 659,529 TRAINING DEVICES 124 TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 2,083 2,083 125 TRAINING AND EDUCATION EQUIPMENT 106,542 106,542 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 126 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 44,448 44,448 127 MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 12,529 12,529 129 NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 5,408 5,408 130 OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 12,105 12,105 131 C4ISR EQUIPMENT 7,670 7,670 132 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 52,597 52,597 133 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 108,901 108,901 134 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 42,154 42,154 OTHER 139 NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE SERVICE 177,585 177,585 140 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 23,176 23,176 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 16,290 16,290 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 142 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 645,900 645,900 143 VIRGINIA CLASS (VACL) SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 470,000 470,000 TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY 14,535,257 14,535,257 PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 1 AAV7A1 PIP 3,353 3,353 2 AMPHIBIOUS COMBAT VEHICLE FAMILY OF VEHICLES 557,564 557,564 3 LAV PIP 42,052 42,052 ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS 4 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER 489 489 5 ARTILLERY WEAPONS SYSTEM 165,268 165,268 6 WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION 14,004 14,004 GUIDED MISSILES 7 TOMAHAWK 105,192 105,192 8 NAVAL STRIKE MISSILE (NSM) 169,726 169,726 9 NAVAL STRIKE MISSILE (NSM) 39,244 39,244 10 GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE 249,103 253,603 Program increase [4,500] 11 ANTI-ARMOR MISSILE-JAVELIN 54,883 54,883 12 FAMILY ANTI-ARMOR WEAPON SYSTEMS (FOAAWS) 23,627 23,627 13 ANTI-ARMOR MISSILE-TOW 2,007 2,007 14 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) 8,867 8,867 COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS 15 COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (C 75,382 75,382 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 16 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 53,590 53,590 OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) 17 MODIFICATION KITS 1,782 1,782 COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) 18 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) 122,917 122,917 19 AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS 23,744 23,744 RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 20 GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR) 66,291 66,291 INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 21 ELECTRO MAGNETIC SPECTRUM OPERATIONS (EMSO) 177,270 177,270 22 GCSS-MC 4,144 4,144 23 FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM 58,483 58,483 24 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 148,062 148,062 26 UNMANNED AIR SYSTEMS (INTEL) 52,273 52,273 27 DCGS-MC 68,289 68,289 28 UAS PAYLOADS 19,088 19,088 OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) 31 EXPEDITIONARY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 2,010 2,010 32 MARINE CORPS ENTERPRISE NETWORK (MCEN) 259,044 259,044 33 COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES 27,966 27,966 34 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS 71,109 71,109 35 RADIO SYSTEMS 544,059 544,059 36 COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS 46,276 46,276 37 COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT 27,111 27,111 38 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 27,583 27,583 40 UNMANNED EXPEDITIONARY SYSTEMS 13,564 13,564 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 2,799 2,799 ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES 43 COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES 34,169 34,169 TACTICAL VEHICLES 44 MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS 17,299 17,299 45 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE 232,501 232,501 46 TRAILERS 2,034 2,034 ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 47 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS 12,956 12,956 48 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED 28,899 28,899 49 AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 15,691 15,691 50 EOD SYSTEMS 41,200 41,200 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 51 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 53,949 53,949 GENERAL PROPERTY 52 FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 5,457 5,457 53 TRAINING DEVICES 96,577 96,577 54 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 29,883 29,883 55 ULTRA-LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (ULTV) 17,034 17,034 OTHER SUPPORT 56 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 27,691 27,691 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 57 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 35,657 35,657 TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS 3,979,212 3,983,712 AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE 1 B–21 RAIDER 1,617,093 1,617,093 2 B–21 RAIDER 708,000 708,000 TACTICAL FORCES 3 F–35 4,877,121 4,877,121 4 F–35 402,000 402,000 5 F–15EX 2,670,039 2,469,591 DAF requested realignment of funds [–200,448] 6 F–15EX 228,000 228,000 TACTICAL AIRLIFT 7 KC–46A MDAP 2,882,590 2,882,590 OTHER AIRLIFT 8 C–130J 34,921 34,921 HELICOPTERS 11 MH–139A 228,807 228,807 12 COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER 282,533 282,533 MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT 13 CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C 3,013 3,013 OTHER AIRCRAFT 15 TARGET DRONES 42,226 42,226 17 E–11 BACN/HAG 67,367 67,367 STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT 19 B–2A 107,980 107,980 20 B–1B 12,757 9,782 DAF requested realignment of funds [–2,975] 21 B–52 65,815 51,798 DAF requested realignment of funds [–14,017] 22 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES 21,723 21,723 TACTICAL AIRCRAFT 24 E–11 BACN/HAG 58,923 58,923 25 F–15 34,830 155,278 DAF requested realignment of funds [120,448] 26 F–16 297,342 297,342 27 F–22A 794,676 794,676 28 F–35 MODIFICATIONS 451,798 451,798 29 F–15 EPAW 280,658 280,658 AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT 31 C–5 24,377 24,377 32 C–17A 140,560 140,560 33 C–32A 19,060 19,060 34 C–37A 13,454 13,454 TRAINER AIRCRAFT 35 GLIDER MODS 5,270 5,270 36 T–6 2,942 2,942 37 T–1 10,950 10,950 38 T–38 125,340 125,340 OTHER AIRCRAFT 40 U–2 MODS 54,727 54,727 42 C–12 446 446 44 VC–25A MOD 29,707 29,707 45 C–40 8,921 8,921 46 C–130 71,177 71,177 47 C–130J MODS 121,258 121,258 48 C–135 153,595 153,595 49 COMPASS CALL 144,686 144,686 50 COMBAT FLIGHT INSPECTION—CFIN 446 446 51 RC–135 220,138 240,138 RC–135 alternate PNT upgrades [20,000] 52 E–3 1,350 1,350 53 E–4 13,055 13,055 56 H–1 816 816 57 H–60 4,207 4,207 60 HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS 101,055 101,055 61 OTHER AIRCRAFT 54,134 73,403 DAF requested realignment of funds [11,619] DAF requested realignment of funds for SLPA-A [7,650] 62 MQ–9 MODS 98,063 98,063 64 SENIOR LEADER C3 SYSTEM—AIRCRAFT 24,847 24,847 65 CV–22 MODS 153,006 153,006 AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 66 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS 781,521 772,877 DAF requested realignment of funds [–8,644] COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 67 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP 157,664 157,664 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT 68 B–2A 1,838 1,838 69 B–2B 15,207 15,207 72 MC–130J 10,117 10,117 74 F–16 1,075 1,075 75 F–22A 38,418 38,418 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS 79 INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIVENESS 18,874 18,874 WAR CONSUMABLES 80 WAR CONSUMABLES 27,482 27,482 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 81 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 1,478,044 1,558,044 DAF requested realignment of funds [80,000] CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 17,165 17,165 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 20,315,204 20,328,837 MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT—BALLISTIC 1 MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC 69,319 69,319 BALLISTIC MISSILES 3 GROUND BASED STRATEGIC DETERRENT 539,300 539,300 STRATEGIC TACTICAL 4 LONG RANGE STAND-OFF WEAPON 66,816 66,816 5 REPLAC EQUIP & WAR CONSUMABLES 37,318 37,318 6 JOINT AIR-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE 915,996 915,996 7 JOINT AIR-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE 769,672 769,672 8 JOINT STRIKE MISSILE 161,011 161,011 9 LRASM0 87,796 87,796 10 LRASM0 99,871 99,871 11 SIDEWINDER (AIM–9X) 95,643 95,643 12 AMRAAM 489,049 489,049 13 AMRAAM 212,410 212,410 14 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE 1,049 1,049 15 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB 48,734 48,734 16 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB II 291,553 291,553 17 STAND-IN ATTACK WEAPON (SIAW) 41,947 41,947 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 18 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS/POL PREVENTION 793 793 CLASS IV 19 ICBM FUZE MOD 115,745 115,745 20 ICBM FUZE MOD 43,044 43,044 21 MM III MODIFICATIONS 48,639 48,639 22 AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) 41,494 41,494 MISSILE SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 23 MSL SPRS/REPAIR PARTS (INITIAL) 6,840 6,840 24 MSL SPRS/REPAIR PARTS (REPLEN) 75,191 75,191 SPECIAL PROGRAMS 29 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS 419,498 419,498 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 851,718 851,718 TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 5,530,446 5,530,446 PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE ROCKETS 1 ROCKETS 18,483 18,483 CARTRIDGES 2 CARTRIDGES 101,104 101,104 BOMBS 4 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 142,118 142,118 5 MASSIVE ORDNANCE PENETRATOR (MOP) 14,074 14,074 6 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION 132,364 132,364 7 B–61 68 68 8 B61–12 TRAINER 10,100 10,100 OTHER ITEMS 9 CAD/PAD 51,487 51,487 10 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) 6,707 6,707 11 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 585 585 13 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 2,299 2,299 14 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 5,115 5,115 FLARES 15 EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES 79,786 79,786 FUZES 16 FUZES 109,562 109,562 SMALL ARMS 17 SMALL ARMS 29,306 29,306 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE 703,158 703,158 PROCUREMENT, SPACE FORCE SPACE PROCUREMENT, SF 1 AF SATELLITE COMM SYSTEM 64,345 64,345 3 COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS 52,665 52,665 4 FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS 25,057 25,057 5 FABT FORCE ELEMENT TERMINAL 121,634 121,634 7 GENERAL INFORMATION TECH—SPACE 3,451 3,451 8 GPSIII FOLLOW ON 119,700 119,700 9 GPS III SPACE SEGMENT 121,770 121,770 10 GLOBAL POSTIONING (SPACE) 893 893 11 HERITAGE TRANSITION 6,110 6,110 12 JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATIONS 580 580 13 SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC) 83,168 83,168 14 MILSATCOM 44,672 44,672 15 SBIR HIGH (SPACE) 39,438 39,438 16 SPECIAL SPACE ACTIVITIES 840,913 380,213 Space Force realignment of funds [–497,000] Space Force Unfunded Priorities List Classified Program A [36,300] 17 MOBILE USER OBJECTIVE SYSTEM 101,147 101,147 18 NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE LAUNCH 2,142,846 2,142,846 20 PTES HUB 56,482 56,482 21 ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM 74,848 74,848 22 SPACE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY LAUNCH 529,468 529,468 23 SPACE MODS 166,596 166,596 24 SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE 114,505 114,505 SPARES 25 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 906 906 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 26 POWER CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT 3,100 3,100 TOTAL PROCUREMENT, SPACE FORCE 4,714,294 4,253,594 OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 1 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 6,123 6,123 CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES 2 MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE 3,961 3,961 3 CAP VEHICLES 1,027 1,027 4 CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES 45,036 47,338 DAF requested realignment of funds [328] DAF requested realignment of funds from OMAF SAG 11R [1,974] SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 5 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE 57,780 57,780 6 SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES 390 390 7 SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 79,023 82,803 DAF requested realignment of funds [340] DAF requested realignment of funds from OMAF SAG 11R [3,440] FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 8 FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES 70,252 70,252 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 9 MATERIALS HANDLING VEHICLES 73,805 75,895 DAF requested realignment of funds from OMAF SAG 11R [1,805] DAF requested realignment of funds from OPAF line 11 [285] BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 10 RUNWAY SNOW REMOV AND CLEANING EQU 22,030 22,030 11 BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT VEHICLES 223,354 240,634 DAF requested realignment of funds [–953] DAF requested realignment of funds from OMAF SAG 11R [18,233] COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC) 13 COMSEC EQUIPMENT 98,600 98,600 INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS 15 INTERNATIONAL INTEL TFECH & ARCHITECTURES 5,393 5,393 16 INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT 5,012 5,012 17 INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT 40,042 40,042 ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS 18 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYS 67,581 67,581 19 NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM 3,841 3,841 20 BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM—FIXED 1,867 1,867 22 3D EXPEDITIONARY LONG-RANGE RADAR 83,735 83,735 23 WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST 28,530 28,530 24 STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL 73,593 73,593 25 CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX 8,221 8,221 26 MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS 17,078 17,078 29 STRATEGIC MISSION PLANNING & EXECUTION SYSTEM 3,861 3,861 SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS 30 GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 206,142 237,093 DAF requested realignment of funds [30,951] 31 AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYS 2,582 2,582 32 BATTLEFIELD AIRBORNE CONTROL NODE (BACN) 30 30 33 MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL 3,768 3,768 34 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM 208,704 208,704 35 COMBAT TRAINING RANGES 346,340 346,340 36 MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMM N 84,102 84,102 37 WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE (WAS) 11,594 11,594 38 C3 COUNTERMEASURES 148,818 148,818 44 AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) 5,032 5,032 AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS 46 BASE INFORMATION TRANSPT INFRAST (BITI) WIRED 108,532 322,704 DAF requested realignment of funds [214,172] 47 AFNET 154,911 154,911 48 JOINT COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT ELEMENT (JCSE) 5,381 5,381 49 USCENTCOM 18,025 18,025 50 USSTRATCOM 4,436 4,436 51 USSPACECOM 27,073 27,073 ORGANIZATION AND BASE 52 TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT 226,819 226,819 53 RADIO EQUIPMENT 30,407 30,407 54 BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE 113,563 113,563 MODIFICATIONS 55 COMM ELECT MODS 98,224 98,224 PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP 56 PERSONAL SAFETY AND RESCUE EQUIPMENT 60,473 60,473 DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS HANDLING EQ 57 POWER CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT 9,235 9,235 58 MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP 15,662 15,662 BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 59 BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT 77,875 77,875 60 ENGINEERING AND EOD EQUIPMENT 280,734 288,968 DAF requested realignment of funds [2,284] DAF requested realignment of funds from OMAF SAG 11R [5,950] 61 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT 207,071 232,271 DAF requested realignment of funds from OMAF SAG 11R [25,200] 62 FUELS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (FSE) 218,790 218,790 63 BASE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 51,914 51,914 SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS 65 DARP RC135 28,882 28,882 66 DCGS-AF 129,655 129,655 70 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM 1,042,833 1,042,833 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 25,456,490 25,456,490 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 71 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS (CYBER) 1,032 1,032 72 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 12,628 12,628 TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 30,417,892 30,721,901 PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCSA 29 MAJOR EQUIPMENT 2,135 2,135 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA 43 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 3,704 3,704 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 11 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY 12,275 12,275 12 TELEPORT PROGRAM 42,399 42,399 14 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 47,538 47,538 15 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK 39,472 39,472 16 WHITE HOUSE COMMUNICATION AGENCY 118,523 118,523 17 SENIOR LEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE 94,591 94,591 18 JOINT REGIONAL SECURITY STACKS (JRSS) 22,714 15,714 Program reduction [–7,000] 19 JOINT SERVICE PROVIDER 107,637 107,637 20 FOURTH ESTATE NETWORK OPTIMIZATION (4ENO) 33,047 33,047 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA 28 MAJOR EQUIPMENT 30,355 30,355 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT 50 MAJOR EQUIPMENT 13,012 13,012 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA 49 AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS 1,358 1,358 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DPAA 1 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DPAA 516 516 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY 46 VEHICLES 366 366 47 OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT 12,787 12,787 48 DTRA CYBER ACTIVITIES 21,413 21,413 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY 31 THAAD 216,782 216,782 33 AEGIS BMD 374,756 374,756 35 BMDS AN/TPY–2 RADARS 29,108 29,108 36 SM–3 IIAS 432,824 432,824 37 ARROW 3 UPPER TIER SYSTEMS 80,000 80,000 38 SHORT RANGE BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE (SRBMD) 40,000 40,000 39 DEFENSE OF GUAM PROCUREMENT 169,627 169,627 40 AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III 2,390 2,390 41 IRON DOME 80,000 80,000 42 AEGIS BMD HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE 27,825 27,825 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD 2 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD 186,006 186,006 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS 30 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS 3,747 3,747 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, USCYBERCOM 51 CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 129,082 160,082 Modernization of Department of Defense Internet Gateway Cyber Defense [31,000] CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 658,529 658,529 AVIATION PROGRAMS 53 ARMED OVERWATCH/TARGETING 266,846 266,846 54 MANNED ISR 7,000 7,000 55 MC–12 600 600 57 ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT 261,012 261,012 58 UNMANNED ISR 26,997 26,997 59 NON-STANDARD AVIATION 25,782 25,782 60 U–28 7,198 7,198 61 MH–47 CHINOOK 149,883 149,883 62 CV–22 MODIFICATION 75,981 75,981 63 MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE 17,684 17,684 64 PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE 108,497 108,497 65 AC/MC–130J 319,754 319,754 66 C–130 MODIFICATIONS 18,796 18,796 SHIPBUILDING 67 UNDERWATER SYSTEMS 66,111 78,171 Seal Delivery Vehicle (SDV) Sonar Payload for Subsea Seabed Acceleration [12,060] AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 68 ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M 147,831 147,831 OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 69 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS 203,400 203,400 70 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 5,718 5,718 71 OTHER ITEMS <$5M 108,816 108,816 72 COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS 55,064 55,064 73 SPECIAL PROGRAMS 20,412 20,412 74 TACTICAL VEHICLES 56,561 56,561 75 WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M 329,837 344,637 Counter Uncrewed Aerial Systems (CUAS) Group 3 Defeat Acceleration [14,800] 76 COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS 4,987 4,987 77 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE 23,639 23,639 78 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS 322,341 322,341 CBDP 79 CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL SITUATIONAL AWARENESS 159,884 159,884 80 CB PROTECTION & HAZARD MITIGATION 231,826 236,826 Chemical nerve agent countermeasures [5,000] TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE 6,056,975 6,112,835 TOTAL PROCUREMENT 167,988,341 169,840,643 XLII RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION Line Program Item FY 2024 Senate RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY BASIC RESEARCH 1 0601102A DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 296,670 296,670 2 0601103A UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES 75,672 75,672 3 0601104A UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS 108,946 108,946 4 0601121A CYBER COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH ALLIANCE 5,459 5,459 5 0601601A ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING BASIC RESEARCH 10,708 10,708 SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH 497,455 497,455 APPLIED RESEARCH 6 0602002A ARMY AGILE INNOVATION AND DEVELOPMENT-APPLIED RESEARCH 5,613 5,613 8 0602134A COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT ADVANCED STUDIES 6,242 6,242 9 0602141A LETHALITY TECHNOLOGY 85,578 85,578 10 0602142A ARMY APPLIED RESEARCH 34,572 34,572 11 0602143A SOLDIER LETHALITY TECHNOLOGY 104,470 114,470 Airborne Pathfinder [10,000] 12 0602144A GROUND TECHNOLOGY 60,005 80,005 Critical hybrid advanced materials processing [7,000] Engineered repair materials for roadways [3,000] Polar proving ground and training program [5,000] Titanium metal powder production technology [5,000] 13 0602145A NEXT GENERATION COMBAT VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY 166,500 181,500 Fuel cells for next generation combat vehicles [5,000] Hydrogen fuel source research and development [10,000] 14 0602146A NETWORK C3I TECHNOLOGY 81,618 81,618 15 0602147A LONG RANGE PRECISION FIRES TECHNOLOGY 34,683 34,683 16 0602148A FUTURE VERTICLE LIFT TECHNOLOGY 73,844 73,844 17 0602150A AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY 33,301 38,301 Counter-Unmanned Aircraft Systems technology [5,000] 18 0602180A ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES 24,142 24,142 19 0602181A ALL DOMAIN CONVERGENCE APPLIED RESEARCH 14,297 14,297 20 0602182A C3I APPLIED RESEARCH 30,659 30,659 21 0602183A AIR PLATFORM APPLIED RESEARCH 48,163 48,163 22 0602184A SOLDIER APPLIED RESEARCH 18,986 18,986 23 0602213A C3I APPLIED CYBER 22,714 22,714 24 0602386A BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR MATERIALS—APPLIED RESEARCH 16,736 16,736 25 0602785A MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY 19,969 19,969 26 0602787A MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY 66,266 71,266 Preventing trauma-related stress disorder [5,000] SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH 948,358 1,003,358 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 27 0603002A MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 4,147 4,147 28 0603007A MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 16,316 16,316 29 0603025A ARMY AGILE INNOVATION AND DEMONSTRATION 23,156 23,156 30 0603040A ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES 13,187 18,187 Tactical artificial intelligence and machine learning [5,000] 31 0603041A ALL DOMAIN CONVERGENCE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 33,332 33,332 32 0603042A C3I ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 19,225 19,225 33 0603043A AIR PLATFORM ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 14,165 14,165 34 0603044A SOLDIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 1,214 1,214 36 0603116A LETHALITY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 20,582 20,582 37 0603117A ARMY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 136,280 136,280 38 0603118A SOLDIER LETHALITY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 102,778 102,778 39 0603119A GROUND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 40,597 45,597 Advanced composites and multi-material protective systems [5,000] 40 0603134A COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT SIMULATION 21,672 21,672 41 0603386A BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR MATERIALS—ADVANCED RESEARCH 59,871 59,871 42 0603457A C3I CYBER ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 28,847 28,847 43 0603461A HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 255,772 265,772 High Performance Computing Modernization Program increase [10,000] 44 0603462A NEXT GENERATION COMBAT VEHICLE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 217,394 224,394 Advanced Manufacturing Center of Excellence [7,000] 45 0603463A NETWORK C3I ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 105,549 105,549 46 0603464A LONG RANGE PRECISION FIRES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 153,024 158,024 Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Solid Rocket Motor [5,000] 47 0603465A FUTURE VERTICAL LIFT ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 158,795 158,795 48 0603466A AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 21,015 26,015 Rapid Assurance Modernization Program-Test [5,000] 49 0603920A HUMANITARIAN DEMINING 9,068 9,068 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 1,455,986 1,492,986 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 51 0603305A ARMY MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 12,904 12,904 52 0603308A ARMY SPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 19,120 19,120 54 0603619A LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER—ADV DEV 47,537 47,537 55 0603639A TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION 91,323 91,323 56 0603645A ARMORED SYSTEM MODERNIZATION—ADV DEV 43,026 43,026 57 0603747A SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY 3,550 3,550 58 0603766A TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—ADV DEV 65,567 65,567 59 0603774A NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 73,675 73,675 60 0603779A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—DEM/VAL 31,720 31,720 61 0603790A NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 4,143 4,143 62 0603801A AVIATION—ADV DEV 1,502,160 1,502,160 63 0603804A LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV 7,604 7,604 64 0603807A MEDICAL SYSTEMS—ADV DEV 1,602 1,602 65 0603827A SOLDIER SYSTEMS—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 27,681 27,681 66 0604017A ROBOTICS DEVELOPMENT 3,024 3,024 67 0604019A EXPANDED MISSION AREA MISSILE (EMAM) 97,018 97,018 68 0604020A CROSS FUNCTIONAL TEAM (CFT) ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPING 117,557 117,557 69 0604035A LOW EARTH ORBIT (LEO) SATELLITE CAPABILITY 38,851 38,851 70 0604036A MULTI-DOMAIN SENSING SYSTEM (MDSS) ADV DEV 191,394 191,394 71 0604037A TACTICAL INTEL TARGETING ACCESS NODE (TITAN) ADV DEV 10,626 10,626 72 0604100A ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 11,095 11,095 73 0604101A SMALL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (SUAV) (6.4) 5,144 5,144 74 0604103A ELECTRONIC WARFARE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT TOOL (EWPMT) 2,260 2,260 75 0604113A FUTURE TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (FTUAS) 53,143 53,143 76 0604114A LOWER TIER AIR MISSILE DEFENSE (LTAMD) SENSOR 816,663 816,663 77 0604115A TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES 281,314 281,314 78 0604117A MANEUVER—SHORT RANGE AIR DEFENSE (M-SHORAD) 281,239 281,239 79 0604119A ARMY ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPING 204,914 204,914 80 0604120A ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING (PNT) 40,930 40,930 81 0604121A SYNTHETIC TRAINING ENVIRONMENT REFINEMENT & PROTOTYPING 109,714 109,714 82 0604134A COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT DEMONSTRATION, PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT, AND TESTING 16,426 16,426 83 0604135A STRATEGIC MID-RANGE FIRES 31,559 31,559 84 0604182A HYPERSONICS 43,435 43,435 85 0604403A FUTURE INTERCEPTOR 8,040 8,040 86 0604531A COUNTER—SMALL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 64,242 64,242 87 0604541A UNIFIED NETWORK TRANSPORT 40,915 40,915 9999 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 19,200 19,200 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 4,420,315 4,420,315 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 91 0604201A AIRCRAFT AVIONICS 13,673 13,673 92 0604270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 12,789 12,789 93 0604601A INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS 64,076 64,076 94 0604604A MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES 28,226 28,226 95 0604611A JAVELIN 7,827 7,827 96 0604622A FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES 44,197 44,197 97 0604633A AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 1,134 1,134 98 0604641A TACTICAL UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLE (TUGV) 142,125 142,125 99 0604642A LIGHT TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLES 53,564 53,564 100 0604645A ARMORED SYSTEMS MODERNIZATION (ASM)—ENG DEV 102,201 102,201 101 0604710A NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS—ENG DEV 48,720 56,220 Enhanced Night Vision Goggle—Binocular capability enhancements [7,500] 102 0604713A COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT 2,223 2,223 103 0604715A NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—ENG DEV 21,441 21,441 104 0604741A AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—ENG DEV 74,738 74,738 105 0604742A CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 30,985 30,985 106 0604746A AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT 13,626 13,626 107 0604760A DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)—ENG DEV 8,802 8,802 108 0604798A BRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION 20,828 20,828 109 0604802A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS—ENG DEV 243,851 243,851 110 0604804A LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV 37,420 42,420 Ultra-Lightweight Camouflage Net System [5,000] 111 0604805A COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV 34,214 34,214 112 0604807A MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV 6,496 6,496 113 0604808A LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER—ENG DEV 13,581 13,581 114 0604818A ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE 168,574 168,574 115 0604820A RADAR DEVELOPMENT 94,944 94,944 116 0604822A GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM (GFEBS) 2,965 2,965 117 0604827A SOLDIER SYSTEMS—WARRIOR DEM/VAL 11,333 11,333 118 0604852A SUITE OF SURVIVABILITY ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS—EMD 79,250 79,250 119 0604854A ARTILLERY SYSTEMS—EMD 42,490 42,490 120 0605013A INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 104,024 104,024 121 0605018A INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPPS-A) 102,084 102,084 123 0605030A JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC) 18,662 18,662 124 0605031A JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK (JTN) 30,328 30,328 125 0605035A COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) 11,509 11,509 126 0605036A COMBATING WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION (CWMD) 1,050 1,050 128 0605041A DEFENSIVE CYBER TOOL DEVELOPMENT 27,714 27,714 129 0605042A TACTICAL NETWORK RADIO SYSTEMS (LOW-TIER) 4,318 4,318 130 0605047A CONTRACT WRITING SYSTEM 16,355 16,355 131 0605049A MISSILE WARNING SYSTEM MODERNIZATION (MWSM) 27,571 27,571 132 0605051A AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY DEVELOPMENT 24,900 24,900 133 0605052A INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INC 2—BLOCK 1 196,248 196,248 134 0605053A GROUND ROBOTICS 35,319 35,319 135 0605054A EMERGING TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVES 201,274 201,274 137 0605144A NEXT GENERATION LOAD DEVICE—MEDIUM 36,970 36,970 139 0605148A TACTICAL INTEL TARGETING ACCESS NODE (TITAN) EMD 132,136 132,136 140 0605203A ARMY SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 81,657 81,657 141 0605205A SMALL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (SUAV) (6.5) 31,284 31,284 142 0605206A CI AND HUMINT EQUIPMENT PROGRAM-ARMY (CIHEP-A) 2,170 2,170 143 0605216A JOINT TARGETING INTEGRATED COMMAND AND COORDINATION SUITE (JTIC2S) 9,290 9,290 144 0605224A MULTI-DOMAIN INTELLIGENCE 41,003 41,003 146 0605231A PRECISION STRIKE MISSILE (PRSM) 272,786 272,786 147 0605232A HYPERSONICS EMD 900,920 900,920 148 0605233A ACCESSIONS INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (AIE) 27,361 27,361 149 0605235A STRATEGIC MID-RANGE CAPABILITY 348,855 348,855 150 0605236A INTEGRATED TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS 22,901 22,901 151 0605450A JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) 3,014 3,014 152 0605457A ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) 284,095 284,095 153 0605531A COUNTER—SMALL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS SYS DEV & DEMONSTRATION 36,016 36,016 154 0605625A MANNED GROUND VEHICLE 996,653 996,653 155 0605766A NATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION (MIP) 15,129 15,129 156 0605812A JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH 27,243 27,243 157 0605830A AVIATION GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 1,167 1,167 158 0303032A TROJAN—RH12 3,879 3,879 159 0304270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 137,186 137,186 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 5,639,364 5,651,864 MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 160 0604256A THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT 38,492 38,492 161 0604258A TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 11,873 11,873 162 0604759A MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT 76,167 76,167 163 0605103A RAND ARROYO CENTER 37,078 37,078 164 0605301A ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL 314,872 314,872 165 0605326A CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM 95,551 95,551 167 0605601A ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES 439,118 449,118 Radar Range Replacement Program [10,000] 168 0605602A ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS 42,220 42,220 169 0605604A SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS 37,518 37,518 170 0605606A AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION 2,718 2,718 172 0605706A MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS 26,902 26,902 173 0605709A EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS 7,805 7,805 174 0605712A SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING 75,133 75,133 175 0605716A ARMY EVALUATION CENTER 71,118 71,118 176 0605718A ARMY MODELING & SIM X-CMD COLLABORATION & INTEG 11,204 11,204 177 0605801A PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES 93,895 93,895 178 0605803A TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES 31,327 31,327 179 0605805A MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY 50,409 50,409 180 0605857A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT 1,629 1,629 181 0605898A ARMY DIRECT REPORT HEADQUARTERS—R&D - MHA 55,843 55,843 182 0606002A RONALD REAGAN BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST SITE 91,340 91,340 183 0606003A COUNTERINTEL AND HUMAN INTEL MODERNIZATION 6,348 6,348 185 0606942A ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS CYBER VULNERABILITIES 6,025 6,025 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1,624,585 1,634,585 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 187 0603778A MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 14,465 14,465 188 0605024A ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 7,472 7,472 189 0607131A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 8,425 8,425 190 0607136A BLACKHAWK PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1,507 11,507 Program increase [10,000] 191 0607137A CHINOOK PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 9,265 19,265 Program increase [10,000] 192 0607139A IMPROVED TURBINE ENGINE PROGRAM 201,247 201,247 193 0607142A AVIATION ROCKET SYSTEM PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT 3,014 3,014 194 0607143A UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM UNIVERSAL PRODUCTS 25,393 25,393 195 0607145A APACHE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT 10,547 20,547 Apache future development program increase [10,000] 196 0607148A AN/TPQ–53 COUNTERFIRE TARGET ACQUISITION RADAR SYSTEM 54,167 54,167 197 0607150A INTEL CYBER DEVELOPMENT 4,345 4,345 198 0607312A ARMY OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 19,000 19,000 199 0607313A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 6,389 6,389 200 0607315A ENDURING TURBINE ENGINES AND POWER SYSTEMS 2,411 2,411 201 0607665A FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS 797 797 202 0607865A PATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT 177,197 177,197 203 0203728A JOINT AUTOMATED DEEP OPERATION COORDINATION SYSTEM (JADOCS) 42,177 42,177 204 0203735A COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 146,635 146,635 205 0203743A 155MM SELF-PROPELLED HOWITZER IMPROVEMENTS 122,902 122,902 207 0203752A AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 146 146 208 0203758A DIGITIZATION 1,515 1,515 209 0203801A MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 4,520 4,520 210 0203802A OTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 10,044 10,044 211 0205412A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEV 281 281 212 0205778A GUIDED MULTIPLE-LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (GMLRS) 75,952 75,952 213 0208053A JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM 203 203 216 0303028A SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES 301 301 217 0303140A INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 15,323 15,323 218 0303141A GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM 13,082 13,082 219 0303142A SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE) 26,838 26,838 222 0305179A INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS) 9,456 9,456 225 0305219A MQ–1C GRAY EAGLE UAS 6,629 6,629 227 0708045A END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES 75,317 75,317 9999 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 8,786 8,786 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 1,105,748 1,135,748 SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS 228 0608041A DEFENSIVE CYBER—SOFTWARE PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT 83,570 83,570 SUBTOTAL SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS 83,570 83,570 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY 15,775,381 15,919,881 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY BASIC RESEARCH 1 0601103N UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES 96,355 96,355 2 0601153N DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 540,908 540,908 SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH 637,263 637,263 APPLIED RESEARCH 3 0602114N POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH 23,982 23,982 4 0602123N FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH 142,148 142,148 5 0602131M MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY 59,208 59,208 6 0602235N COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH 52,090 52,090 7 0602236N WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH 74,722 82,722 Research on foreign malign influence operations [8,000] 8 0602271N ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH 92,473 92,473 9 0602435N OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH 80,806 87,806 Intelligent Autonomous Systems for Seabed Warfare [7,000] 10 0602651M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH 7,419 7,419 11 0602747N UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH 61,503 61,503 12 0602750N FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH 182,662 182,662 13 0602782N MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH 30,435 30,435 14 0602792N INNOVATIVE NAVAL PROTOTYPES (INP) APPLIED RESEARCH 133,828 133,828 15 0602861N SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT—ONR FIELD ACITIVITIES 85,063 85,063 SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH 1,026,339 1,041,339 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 16 0603123N FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 29,512 29,512 17 0603271N ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 8,418 8,418 18 0603273N SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY FOR NUCLEAR RE-ENTRY SYSTEMS 112,329 112,329 19 0603640M USMC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION (ATD) 308,217 323,217 Adaptive Future Force [5,000] Hardware In the Loop capabilities [5,000] Next generation unmanned aerial system distribution platform [5,000] 20 0603651M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 15,556 15,556 21 0603673N FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 264,700 264,700 22 0603680N MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 61,843 61,843 23 0603729N WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 5,100 9,100 Balloon catheter hemorrhage control device [4,000] 24 0603758N NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS 75,898 75,898 25 0603782N MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 2,048 2,048 26 0603801N INNOVATIVE NAVAL PROTOTYPES (INP) ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 132,931 132,931 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 1,016,552 1,035,552 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 27 0603128N UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM 108,225 108,225 28 0603178N LARGE UNMANNED SURFACE VEHICLES (LUSV) 117,400 117,400 29 0603207N AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS 40,653 40,653 30 0603216N AVIATION SURVIVABILITY 20,874 20,874 31 0603239N NAVAL CONSTRUCTION FORCES 7,821 7,821 32 0603254N ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 17,090 17,090 33 0603261N TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE 3,721 3,721 34 0603382N ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY 6,216 6,216 35 0603502N SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES 34,690 34,690 36 0603506N SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE 730 730 37 0603512N CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 6,095 6,095 38 0603525N PILOT FISH 916,208 916,208 39 0603527N RETRACT LARCH 7,545 7,545 40 0603536N RETRACT JUNIPER 271,109 271,109 41 0603542N RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL 811 811 42 0603553N SURFACE ASW 1,189 1,189 43 0603561N ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 88,415 88,415 44 0603562N SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS 15,119 15,119 45 0603563N SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN 89,939 89,939 46 0603564N SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES 121,402 121,402 47 0603570N ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS 319,656 319,656 48 0603573N ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS 133,911 133,911 49 0603576N CHALK EAGLE 116,078 116,078 50 0603581N LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS) 32,615 32,615 51 0603582N COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION 18,610 18,610 52 0603595N OHIO REPLACEMENT 257,076 262,076 Advanced composites for wet submarine applications [5,000] 53 0603596N LCS MISSION MODULES 31,464 31,464 54 0603597N AUTOMATED TEST AND RE-TEST (ATRT) 10,809 10,809 55 0603599N FRIGATE DEVELOPMENT 112,972 112,972 56 0603609N CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS 9,030 9,030 57 0603635M MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM 128,782 128,782 58 0603654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT 44,766 44,766 59 0603713N OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 10,751 10,751 60 0603721N ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 24,457 24,457 61 0603724N NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM 72,214 72,214 62 0603725N FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT 10,149 10,149 63 0603734N CHALK CORAL 687,841 687,841 64 0603739N NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY 4,712 4,712 65 0603746N RETRACT MAPLE 420,455 420,455 66 0603748N LINK PLUMERIA 2,100,474 2,100,474 67 0603751N RETRACT ELM 88,036 88,036 68 0603764M LINK EVERGREEN 547,005 547,005 69 0603790N NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 6,265 6,265 70 0603795N LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY 1,624 1,624 71 0603851M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TESTING 31,058 31,058 72 0603860N JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS—DEM/VAL 22,590 22,590 73 0603925N DIRECTED ENERGY AND ELECTRIC WEAPON SYSTEMS 52,129 52,129 74 0604014N F/A –18 INFRARED SEARCH AND TRACK (IRST) 32,127 32,127 75 0604027N DIGITAL WARFARE OFFICE 181,001 181,001 76 0604028N SMALL AND MEDIUM UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLES 110,506 110,506 77 0604029N UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLE CORE TECHNOLOGIES 71,156 71,156 78 0604030N RAPID PROTOTYPING, EXPERIMENTATION AND DEMONSTRATION. 214,100 214,100 79 0604031N LARGE UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLES 6,900 6,900 80 0604112N GERALD R. FORD CLASS NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIER (CVN 78—80) 118,182 118,182 82 0604127N SURFACE MINE COUNTERMEASURES 16,127 16,127 83 0604272N TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (TADIRCM) 34,684 34,684 84 0604289M NEXT GENERATION LOGISTICS 5,991 5,991 85 0604292N FUTURE VERTICAL LIFT (MARITIME STRIKE) 2,100 2,100 86 0604320M RAPID TECHNOLOGY CAPABILITY PROTOTYPE 131,763 131,763 87 0604454N LX (R) 21,319 21,319 88 0604536N ADVANCED UNDERSEA PROTOTYPING 104,328 104,328 89 0604636N COUNTER UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (C-UAS) 11,567 11,567 90 0604659N PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 5,976 195,976 Nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missile [190,000] 91 0604707N SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING SUPPORT 9,993 9,993 92 0604786N OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT 237,655 237,655 93 0605512N MEDIUM UNMANNED SURFACE VEHICLES (MUSVS)) 85,800 85,800 94 0605513N UNMANNED SURFACE VEHICLE ENABLING CAPABILITIES 176,261 176,261 95 0605514M GROUND BASED ANTI-SHIP MISSILE 36,383 36,383 96 0605516M LONG RANGE FIRES 36,763 36,763 97 0605518N CONVENTIONAL PROMPT STRIKE (CPS) 901,064 901,064 98 0303354N ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT—MIP 10,167 10,167 99 0304240M ADVANCED TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM 539 539 100 0304270N ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT—MIP 1,250 1,250 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 9,734,483 9,929,483 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 101 0603208N TRAINING SYSTEM AIRCRAFT 44,120 44,120 102 0604038N MARITIME TARGETING CELL 30,922 30,922 103 0604212M OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT 101,209 101,209 104 0604212N OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT 2,604 2,604 105 0604214M AV–8B AIRCRAFT—ENG DEV 8,263 8,263 106 0604215N STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT 4,039 4,039 107 0604216N MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT 62,350 62,350 108 0604221N P–3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 771 771 109 0604230N WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM 109,485 109,485 110 0604231N COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS 87,457 87,457 111 0604234N ADVANCED HAWKEYE 399,919 399,919 112 0604245M H–1 UPGRADES 29,766 29,766 113 0604261N ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS 51,531 51,531 114 0604262N V–22A 137,597 137,597 115 0604264N AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 42,155 42,155 116 0604269N EA–18 172,507 172,507 117 0604270N ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 171,384 171,384 118 0604273M EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT 35,376 35,376 119 0604274N NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) 40,477 40,477 120 0604280N JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM—NAVY (JTRS-NAVY) 451,397 451,397 121 0604282N NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) INCREMENT II 250,577 250,577 122 0604307N SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING 453,311 453,311 124 0604329N SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) 52,211 52,211 125 0604366N STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS 418,187 418,187 126 0604373N AIRBORNE MCM 11,368 11,368 127 0604378N NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL—COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 66,445 66,445 128 0604419N ADVANCED SENSORS APPLICATION PROGRAM (ASAP) 0 13,000 Program increase [13,000] 129 0604501N ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS 115,396 115,396 130 0604503N SSN–688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION 93,435 93,435 131 0604504N AIR CONTROL 42,656 42,656 132 0604512N SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS 10,442 10,442 133 0604518N COMBAT INFORMATION CENTER CONVERSION 11,359 11,359 134 0604522N AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR (AMDR) SYSTEM 90,307 90,307 135 0604530N ADVANCED ARRESTING GEAR (AAG) 10,658 10,658 136 0604558N NEW DESIGN SSN 234,356 234,356 137 0604562N SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM 71,516 71,516 138 0604567N SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/ LIVE FIRE T&E 22,462 22,462 139 0604574N NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES 4,279 4,279 140 0604601N MINE DEVELOPMENT 104,731 104,731 141 0604610N LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT 229,668 229,668 142 0604654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT 9,064 9,064 143 0604657M USMC GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV 62,329 62,329 144 0604703N PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS 9,319 9,319 145 0604727N JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS 1,964 1,964 146 0604755N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) 158,426 158,426 147 0604756N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL) 47,492 47,492 148 0604757N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW) 125,206 125,206 149 0604761N INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING 19,969 19,969 150 0604771N MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT 6,061 6,061 151 0604777N NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM 45,262 45,262 154 0604850N SSN(X) 361,582 361,582 155 0605013M INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 22,663 22,663 156 0605013N INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 282,138 282,138 157 0605024N ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 8,340 8,340 158 0605180N TACAMO MODERNIZATION 213,743 213,743 159 0605212M CH–53K RDTE 222,288 222,288 160 0605215N MISSION PLANNING 86,448 86,448 161 0605217N COMMON AVIONICS 81,076 81,076 162 0605220N SHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR (SSC) 1,343 1,343 163 0605327N T-AO 205 CLASS 71 71 164 0605414N UNMANNED CARRIER AVIATION (UCA) 220,404 220,404 165 0605450M JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) 384 384 166 0605500N MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA) 36,027 36,027 167 0605504N MULTI-MISSION MARITIME (MMA) INCREMENT III 132,449 132,449 168 0605611M MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 103,236 103,236 169 0605813M JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 2,609 2,609 170 0204202N DDG–1000 231,778 231,778 171 0301377N COUNTERING ADVANCED CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS (CACW) 17,531 17,531 172 0304785N ISR & INFO OPERATIONS 174,271 174,271 173 0306250M CYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 2,068 2,068 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 6,962,234 6,975,234 MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 174 0604256N THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT 22,918 22,918 175 0604258N TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 18,623 18,623 176 0604759N MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT 74,221 74,221 177 0605152N STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—NAVY 3,229 3,229 178 0605154N CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES 45,672 45,672 180 0605804N TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES 1,000 1,000 181 0605853N MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT 124,328 124,328 182 0605856N STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT 4,053 4,053 183 0605863N RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT 203,447 203,447 184 0605864N TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT 481,975 484,975 Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center improvements [3,000] 185 0605865N OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY 29,399 29,399 186 0605866N NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) SUPPORT 27,504 27,504 187 0605867N SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT 9,183 9,183 188 0605873M MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT 34,976 34,976 189 0605898N MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D 41,331 41,331 190 0606355N WARFARE INNOVATION MANAGEMENT 37,340 37,340 191 0305327N INSIDER THREAT 2,246 2,246 192 0902498N MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (DEPARTMENTAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES) 2,168 2,168 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1,163,613 1,166,613 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 196 0604840M F–35 C2D2 544,625 544,625 197 0604840N F–35 C2D2 543,834 543,834 198 0605520M MARINE CORPS AIR DEFENSE WEAPONS SYSTEMS 99,860 99,860 199 0607658N COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY (CEC) 153,440 153,440 200 0101221N STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT 321,648 331,648 Fleet Ballistic Missile Strategic Weapon System [10,000] 201 0101224N SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 62,694 62,694 202 0101226N SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 92,869 92,869 203 0101402N NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS 51,919 51,919 204 0204136N F/A–18 SQUADRONS 333,783 333,783 205 0204228N SURFACE SUPPORT 8,619 8,619 206 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER (TMPC) 122,834 122,834 207 0204311N INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM 76,279 76,279 208 0204313N SHIP-TOWED ARRAY SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS 1,103 1,103 209 0204413N AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS (DISPLACEMENT CRAFT) 1,991 1,991 210 0204460M GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR) 92,674 92,674 211 0204571N CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 115,894 115,894 212 0204575N ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT 61,677 61,677 213 0205601N ANTI-RADIATION MISSILE IMPROVEMENT 59,555 59,555 214 0205620N SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION 29,973 29,973 215 0205632N MK–48 ADCAP 213,165 213,165 216 0205633N AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS 143,277 143,277 217 0205675N OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS 152,546 152,546 218 0206313M MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 192,625 192,625 219 0206335M COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (CAC2S) 12,565 12,565 220 0206623M MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS 83,900 83,900 221 0206624M MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT 27,794 27,794 222 0206625M USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP) 47,762 47,762 223 0206629M AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT VEHICLE 373 373 224 0207161N TACTICAL AIM MISSILES 36,439 36,439 225 0207163N ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) 29,198 29,198 226 0208043N PLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM (PDAS) 3,565 3,565 230 0303138N AFLOAT NETWORKS 49,995 49,995 231 0303140N INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 33,390 33,390 232 0305192N MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (MIP) ACTIVITIES 7,304 7,304 233 0305204N TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES 11,235 11,235 234 0305205N UAS INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY 16,409 16,409 235 0305208M DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 51,192 51,192 236 0305220N MQ–4C TRITON 12,094 12,094 237 0305231N MQ–8 UAV 29,700 29,700 238 0305232M RQ–11 UAV 2,107 2,107 239 0305234N SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0) 2,999 2,999 240 0305241N MULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT 49,460 49,460 241 0305242M UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS) PAYLOADS (MIP) 13,005 13,005 242 0305251N CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS FORCES AND FORCE SUPPORT 2,000 2,000 243 0305421N RQ–4 MODERNIZATION 300,378 300,378 244 0307577N INTELLIGENCE MISSION DATA (IMD) 788 788 245 0308601N MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT 10,994 10,994 246 0702207N DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) 23,248 23,248 247 0708730N MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH) 3,284 3,284 9999 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 2,021,376 2,021,376 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 6,359,438 6,369,438 SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS 249 0608013N RISK MANAGEMENT INFORMATION—SOFTWARE PILOT PROGRAM 11,748 11,748 250 0608231N MARITIME TACTICAL COMMAND AND CONTROL (MTC2)—SOFTWARE PILOT PROGRAM 10,555 10,555 SUBTOTAL SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS 22,303 22,303 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY 26,922,225 27,177,225 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF BASIC RESEARCH 1 0601102F DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 401,486 401,486 2 0601103F UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES 182,372 182,372 SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH 583,858 583,858 APPLIED RESEARCH 3 0602020F FUTURE AF CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH 90,713 90,713 4 0602022F UNIVERSITY AFFILIATED RESEARCH CENTER (UARC)—TACTICAL AUTONOMY 8,018 8,018 5 0602102F MATERIALS 142,325 151,325 Advanced materials science for manufacturing research [9,000] 6 0602201F AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES 161,268 161,268 7 0602202F HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH 146,921 146,921 8 0602203F AEROSPACE PROPULSION 184,867 184,867 9 0602204F AEROSPACE SENSORS 216,269 216,269 11 0602298F SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT— MAJOR HEADQUARTERS ACTIVITIES 10,303 10,303 12 0602602F CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS 160,599 160,599 13 0602605F DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY 129,961 118,452 DAF requested realignment of funds to 6601SF [–11,509] 14 0602788F DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS 182,076 220,076 Distributed quantum information sciences networking testbed [5,000] Future Flag experimentation testbed [15,000] Ion trapped quantum information sciences computer [8,000] Multi-domain radio frequency spectrum testing environment [5,000] Secure interference-avoiding connectivity of autonomous artificially intelligent machines [5,000] SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH 1,433,320 1,468,811 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 15 0603032F FUTURE AF INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY DEMOS 255,855 213,655 Program reduction [–42,200] 16 0603112F ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS 30,372 30,372 17 0603199F SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T) 10,478 10,478 18 0603203F ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS 48,046 48,046 19 0603211F AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO 51,896 61,896 Semiautonomous adversary air platform [10,000] 20 0603216F AEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY 56,789 56,789 21 0603270F ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY 32,510 32,510 22 0603273F SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY FOR NUCLEAR RE-ENTRY SYSTEMS 70,321 70,321 23 0603444F MAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS) 2 2 24 0603456F HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 15,593 15,593 25 0603601F CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 132,311 132,311 26 0603605F ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 102,997 102,997 27 0603680F MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 44,422 49,422 Additive manufacturing for aerospace parts [5,000] 28 0603788F BATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 37,779 37,779 29 0207412F CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC) 2,005 2,005 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 891,376 864,176 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 30 0603036F MODULAR ADVANCED MISSILE 105,238 105,238 31 0603260F INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 6,237 6,237 32 0603742F COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY 21,298 21,298 33 0603790F NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 2,208 2,208 34 0603851F INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—DEM/VAL 45,319 75,319 Enhanced ICBM guidance capability and testing [30,000] 35 0604001F NC3 ADVANCED CONCEPTS 10,011 10,011 37 0604003F ADVANCED BATTLE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ABMS) 500,575 500,575 38 0604004F ADVANCED ENGINE DEVELOPMENT 595,352 595,352 39 0604005F NC3 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPING 78,799 78,799 40 0604006F DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE TECH ARCHITECTURE 2,620 0 DAF requested realignment of funds to 64858F [–2,620] 41 0604007F E–7 681,039 681,039 42 0604009F AFWERX PRIME 83,336 83,336 43 0604015F LONG RANGE STRIKE—BOMBER 2,984,143 2,984,143 44 0604025F RAPID DEFENSE EXPERIMENTATION RESERVE (RDER) 154,300 154,300 45 0604032F DIRECTED ENERGY PROTOTYPING 1,246 1,246 46 0604033F HYPERSONICS PROTOTYPING 150,340 0 Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon reduction [–150,340] 47 0604183F HYPERSONICS PROTOTYPING—HYPERSONIC ATTACK CRUISE MISSILE (HACM) 381,528 381,528 48 0604201F PNT RESILIENCY, MODS, AND IMPROVEMENTS 18,041 18,041 49 0604257F ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AND SENSORS 27,650 27,650 50 0604288F SURVIVABLE AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER (SAOC) 888,829 888,829 51 0604317F TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 26,638 26,638 52 0604327F HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT SYSTEM (HDBTDS) PROGRAM 19,266 19,266 53 0604414F CYBER RESILIENCY OF WEAPON SYSTEMS-ACS 37,121 37,121 55 0604668F JOINT TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (JTMS) 37,026 37,026 56 0604776F DEPLOYMENT & DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE R&D 31,833 31,833 57 0604858F TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM 210,806 235,476 DAF requested realignment of funds from OMAF SAG 11R [17,550] DAF requested realignment of funds from OMAF SAG 11Z [4,500] DAF requested realignment of funds from RDAF 64006F [2,620] 58 0604860F OPERATIONAL ENERGY AND INSTALLATION RESILIENCE 46,305 46,305 59 0605164F AIR REFUELING CAPABILITY MODERNIZATION 19,400 19,400 61 0207110F NEXT GENERATION AIR DOMINANCE 2,326,128 2,326,128 62 0207179F AUTONOMOUS COLLABORATIVE PLATFORMS 118,826 101,013 DAF requested realignment of funds [–17,813] 63 0207420F COMBAT IDENTIFICATION 1,902 1,902 64 0207455F THREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR (3DELRR) 19,763 19,763 65 0207522F AIRBASE AIR DEFENSE SYSTEMS (ABADS) 78,867 78,867 66 0208030F WAR RESERVE MATERIEL—AMMUNITION 8,175 8,175 68 0305236F COMMON DATA LINK EXECUTIVE AGENT (CDL EA) 25,157 25,157 69 0305601F MISSION PARTNER ENVIRONMENTS 17,727 17,727 72 0708051F RAPID SUSTAINMENT MODERNIZATION (RSM) 43,431 43,431 73 0808737F INTEGRATED PRIMARY PREVENTION 9,364 9,364 74 0901410F CONTRACTING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM 28,294 28,294 75 1206415F U.S. SPACE COMMAND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT 14,892 14,892 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 9,859,030 9,742,927 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 76 0604200F FUTURE ADVANCED WEAPON ANALYSIS & PROGRAMS 9,757 9,757 77 0604201F PNT RESILIENCY, MODS, AND IMPROVEMENTS 163,156 163,156 78 0604222F NUCLEAR WEAPONS SUPPORT 45,884 45,884 79 0604270F ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 13,804 13,804 80 0604281F TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE 74,023 79,023 DAF requested realignment of funds [5,000] 81 0604287F PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 10,605 10,605 82 0604602F ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT 5,918 5,918 83 0604604F SUBMUNITIONS 3,345 3,345 84 0604617F AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT 21,967 21,967 85 0604706F LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS 39,301 39,301 86 0604735F COMBAT TRAINING RANGES 152,569 152,569 87 0604932F LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON 911,406 891,406 DAF realignment of funds [–20,000] 88 0604933F ICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION 71,732 71,732 89 0605030F JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC) 2,256 2,256 90 0605031F JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK (JTN) 452 452 91 0605056F OPEN ARCHITECTURE MANAGEMENT 36,582 36,582 92 0605057F NEXT GENERATION AIR-REFUELING SYSTEM 7,928 7,928 93 0605223F ADVANCED PILOT TRAINING 77,252 77,252 94 0605229F HH–60W 48,268 48,268 95 0605238F GROUND BASED STRATEGIC DETERRENT EMD 3,746,935 3,739,285 DAF requested realignment of funds [–7,650] 96 0207171F F–15 EPAWSS 13,982 13,982 97 0207279F ISOLATED PERSONNEL SURVIVABILITY AND RECOVERY 56,225 56,225 98 0207328F STAND IN ATTACK WEAPON 298,585 298,585 99 0207701F FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING 7,597 7,597 100 0208036F MEDICAL C-CBRNE PROGRAMS 2,006 2,006 102 0305205F ENDURANCE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES 30,000 30,000 103 0401221F KC–46A TANKER SQUADRONS 124,662 124,662 104 0401319F VC–25B 490,701 470,701 5G interference mitigation for critical aircraft navigation and sensor systems on the Presidential Aircraft Fleet [30,000] Program reduction [–50,000] 105 0701212F AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEMS 12,911 12,911 106 0804772F TRAINING DEVELOPMENTS 1,922 1,922 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 6,481,731 6,439,081 MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 107 0604256F THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT 16,626 16,626 108 0604759F MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT 31,143 31,143 109 0605101F RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE 38,398 38,398 110 0605502F SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH 1,466 1,466 111 0605712F INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION 13,736 13,736 112 0605807F TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT 913,213 946,026 DAF requested realignment of funds [32,813] 113 0605827F ACQ WORKFORCE- GLOBAL VIG & COMBAT SYS 317,901 317,901 114 0605828F ACQ WORKFORCE- GLOBAL REACH 541,677 541,677 115 0605829F ACQ WORKFORCE- CYBER, NETWORK, & BUS SYS 551,213 536,513 DAF requested realignment of funds [–14,700] 117 0605831F ACQ WORKFORCE- CAPABILITY INTEGRATION 243,780 273,780 DAF requested realignment of funds [30,000] 118 0605832F ACQ WORKFORCE- ADVANCED PRGM TECHNOLOGY 109,030 77,030 DAF requested realignment of funds [–32,000] 119 0605833F ACQ WORKFORCE- NUCLEAR SYSTEMS 336,788 336,788 120 0605898F MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D 5,005 6,705 DAF requested realignment of funds [1,700] 121 0605976F FACILITIES RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT 87,889 87,889 122 0605978F FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT 35,065 35,065 123 0606017F REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION 89,956 89,956 124 0606398F MANAGEMENT HQ—T&E 7,453 7,453 126 0303255F COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATION, AND COMPUTERS (C4)—STRATCOM 20,871 40,871 NC3 network sensor demonstration [10,000] NC3 Rapid Engineering Architecture Collaboration Hub (REACH) [10,000] 127 0308602F ENTEPRISE INFORMATION SERVICES (EIS) 100,357 100,357 128 0702806F ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 20,478 20,478 129 0804731F GENERAL SKILL TRAINING 796 6,796 Security Work Readiness for Duty [6,000] 132 1001004F INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES 3,917 3,917 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 3,486,758 3,530,571 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 134 0604233F SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING 41,464 41,464 135 0604283F BATTLE MGMT COM & CTRL SENSOR DEVELOPMENT 40,000 40,000 136 0604445F WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE 8,018 8,018 137 0604617F AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT 5,645 5,645 139 0604840F F–35 C2D2 1,275,268 1,270,268 DAF requested realignment of funds [–5,000] 140 0605018F AF INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM (AF-IPPS) 40,203 40,203 141 0605024F ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY 49,613 49,613 142 0605117F FOREIGN MATERIEL ACQUISITION AND EXPLOITATION 93,881 93,881 143 0605278F HC/MC–130 RECAP RDT&E 36,536 36,536 144 0606018F NC3 INTEGRATION 22,910 22,910 145 0101113F B–52 SQUADRONS 950,815 964,832 DAF requested realignment of funds [14,017] 146 0101122F AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) 290 290 147 0101126F B–1B SQUADRONS 12,619 12,619 148 0101127F B–2 SQUADRONS 87,623 87,623 149 0101213F MINUTEMAN SQUADRONS 33,237 33,237 150 0101316F WORLDWIDE JOINT STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS 24,653 24,653 151 0101318F SERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM—GLOBAL STRIKE 7,562 7,562 153 0101328F ICBM REENTRY VEHICLES 475,415 475,415 155 0102110F MH–139A 25,737 25,737 156 0102326F REGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL CENTER MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 831 831 157 0102412F NORTH WARNING SYSTEM (NWS) 102 102 158 0102417F OVER-THE-HORIZON BACKSCATTER RADAR 428,754 428,754 159 0202834F VEHICLES AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT—GENERAL 15,498 19,498 DAF requested realignment of funds [4,000] 160 0205219F MQ–9 UAV 81,123 81,123 161 0205671F JOINT COUNTER RCIED ELECTRONIC WARFARE 2,303 2,303 162 0207040F MULTI-PLATFORM ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT 7,312 7,312 164 0207133F F–16 SQUADRONS 98,633 98,633 165 0207134F F–15E SQUADRONS 50,965 50,965 166 0207136F MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION 16,543 16,543 167 0207138F F–22A SQUADRONS 725,889 725,889 168 0207142F F–35 SQUADRONS 97,231 97,231 169 0207146F F–15EX 100,006 100,006 170 0207161F TACTICAL AIM MISSILES 41,958 41,958 171 0207163F ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) 53,679 53,679 172 0207227F COMBAT RESCUE—PARARESCUE 726 726 173 0207238F E–11A 64,888 64,888 174 0207247F AF TENCAP 25,749 25,749 175 0207249F PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT 11,872 11,872 176 0207253F COMPASS CALL 66,932 66,932 177 0207268F AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 55,223 55,223 178 0207325F JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE (JASSM) 132,937 132,937 179 0207327F SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) 37,518 37,518 180 0207410F AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) 72,059 72,059 181 0207412F CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC) 17,498 17,498 183 0207418F AFSPECWAR—TACP 2,106 2,106 185 0207431F COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES 72,010 72,010 186 0207438F THEATER BATTLE MANAGEMENT (TBM) C4I 6,467 6,467 187 0207439F ELECTRONIC WARFARE INTEGRATED REPROGRAMMING (EWIR) 10,388 10,388 188 0207444F TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY-MOD 10,060 10,060 189 0207452F DCAPES 8,233 8,233 190 0207521F AIR FORCE CALIBRATION PROGRAMS 2,172 2,172 192 0207573F NATIONAL TECHNICAL NUCLEAR FORENSICS 2,049 2,049 193 0207590F SEEK EAGLE 33,478 33,478 195 0207605F WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS 11,894 11,894 197 0207697F DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES 3,811 3,811 198 0208006F MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS 96,272 96,272 199 0208007F TACTICAL DECEPTION 26,533 26,533 201 0208087F DISTRIBUTED CYBER WARFARE OPERATIONS 50,122 50,122 202 0208088F AF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 113,064 113,064 208 0208288F INTEL DATA APPLICATIONS 967 967 209 0301025F GEOBASE 1,514 1,514 211 0301113F CYBER SECURITY INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT 8,476 8,476 218 0301401F AF MULTI-DOMAIN NON-TRADITIONAL ISR BATTLESPACE AWARENESS 2,890 3,390 Military Cyber Cooperation Activities with the Kingdom of Jordan [500] 219 0302015F E–4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER (NAOC) 39,868 39,868 220 0303004F EIT CONNECT 32,900 32,900 221 0303089F CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS SYSTEMS 4,881 4,881 222 0303131F MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN) 33,567 33,567 223 0303133F HIGH FREQUENCY RADIO SYSTEMS 40,000 40,000 224 0303140F INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 95,523 95,523 226 0303248F ALL DOMAIN COMMON PLATFORM 71,296 71,296 227 0303260F JOINT MILITARY DECEPTION INITIATIVE 4,682 4,682 228 0304100F STRATEGIC MISSION PLANNING & EXECUTION SYSTEM (SMPES) 64,944 64,944 230 0304260F AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE 108,947 108,947 231 0304310F COMMERCIAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 4,635 4,635 234 0305015F C2 AIR OPERATIONS SUITE—C2 INFO SERVICES 13,751 13,751 235 0305020F CCMD INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1,660 1,660 236 0305022F ISR MODERNIZATION & AUTOMATION DVMT (IMAD) 18,680 18,680 237 0305099F GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM) 5,031 5,031 238 0305103F CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE 301 301 239 0305111F WEATHER SERVICE 26,329 35,329 Weather service data migration [9,000] 240 0305114F AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, AND LANDING SYSTEM (ATCALS) 8,751 8,751 241 0305116F AERIAL TARGETS 6,915 6,915 244 0305128F SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES 352 352 245 0305146F DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES 6,930 6,930 246 0305179F INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS) 21,588 21,588 247 0305202F DRAGON U–2 16,842 16,842 248 0305206F AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS 43,158 43,158 249 0305207F MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS 14,330 14,330 250 0305208F DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 88,854 88,854 251 0305220F RQ–4 UAV 1,242 1,242 252 0305221F NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGETING 12,496 12,496 253 0305238F NATO AGS 2 2 254 0305240F SUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE 31,589 31,589 255 0305600F INTERNATIONAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURES 15,322 15,322 256 0305881F RAPID CYBER ACQUISITION 8,830 8,830 257 0305984F PERSONNEL RECOVERY COMMAND & CTRL (PRC2) 2,764 2,764 258 0307577F INTELLIGENCE MISSION DATA (IMD) 7,090 7,090 259 0401115F C–130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON 5,427 5,427 260 0401119F C–5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS (IF) 29,502 29,502 261 0401130F C–17 AIRCRAFT (IF) 2,753 2,753 262 0401132F C–130J PROGRAM 19,100 19,100 263 0401134F LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES (LAIRCM) 5,982 5,982 264 0401218F KC–135S 51,105 51,105 265 0401318F CV–22 18,127 18,127 266 0408011F SPECIAL TACTICS / COMBAT CONTROL 9,198 9,198 268 0708610F LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT) 17,520 17,520 269 0801380F AF LVC OPERATIONAL TRAINING (LVC-OT) 25,144 25,144 270 0804743F OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING 2,265 2,265 272 0901202F JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY 2,266 2,266 273 0901218F CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM 4,006 4,006 274 0901220F PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 3,078 3,078 275 0901226F AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY 5,309 5,309 276 0901538F FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 4,279 4,279 277 0901554F DEFENSE ENTERPRISE ACNTNG AND MGT SYS (DEAMS) 45,925 45,925 278 1202140F SERVICE SUPPORT TO SPACECOM ACTIVITIES 9,778 9,778 9999 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 16,814,245 16,814,245 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 23,829,283 23,851,800 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF 46,565,356 46,481,224 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, SF APPLIED RESEARCH 4 1206601SF SPACE TECHNOLOGY 206,196 350,663 Advanced analog microelectronics [8,600] Advanced isotope power systems [5,000] DAF requested realignment of funds [84,397] Ground-based interferometry [16,000] Lunar surface-based domain awareness [5,000] Solar cruiser [10,000] Space modeling, simulation, and analysis hub [15,470] SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH 206,196 350,663 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 5 1206310SF SPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 472,493 477,493 Human performance optimization [5,000] 6 1206616SF SPACE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT/DEMO 110,033 158,033 DAF requested realignment of funds [40,000] Modular multi-mode propulsion system [8,000] SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 582,526 635,526 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 7 0604002SF SPACE FORCE WEATHER SERVICES RESEARCH 849 849 8 1203010SF SPACE FORCE IT, DATA ANALYTICS, DIGITAL SOLUTIONS 61,723 61,723 9 1203164SF NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER EQUIPMENT) (SPACE) 353,807 353,807 10 1203622SF SPACE WARFIGHTING ANALYSIS 95,541 95,541 11 1203710SF EO/IR WEATHER SYSTEMS 95,615 112,115 Weather satellite risk reduction [16,500] 13 1206410SF SPACE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPING 2,081,307 2,081,307 16 1206427SF SPACE SYSTEMS PROTOTYPE TRANSITIONS (SSPT) 145,948 105,948 DAF requested realignment of funds to 6616SF [–40,000] 17 1206438SF SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY 58,374 58,374 18 1206458SF TECH TRANSITION (SPACE) 164,649 179,649 Encouraging the establishment of the outernet [15,000] 19 1206730SF SPACE SECURITY AND DEFENSE PROGRAM 59,784 59,784 20 1206760SF PROTECTED TACTICAL ENTERPRISE SERVICE (PTES) 76,554 76,554 21 1206761SF PROTECTED TACTICAL SERVICE (PTS) 360,126 360,126 22 1206855SF EVOLVED STRATEGIC SATCOM (ESS) 632,833 632,833 23 1206857SF SPACE RAPID CAPABILITIES OFFICE 12,036 12,036 24 1206862SF TACTICALLY RESPONSE SPACE 30,000 30,000 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 4,229,146 4,220,646 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 25 1203269SF GPS III FOLLOW-ON (GPS IIIF) 308,999 308,999 27 1206421SF COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS 36,537 36,537 28 1206422SF WEATHER SYSTEM FOLLOW-ON 79,727 79,727 29 1206425SF SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS 372,827 372,827 30 1206431SF ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE) 4,068 4,068 31 1206432SF POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE) 73,757 73,757 32 1206433SF WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE) 49,445 49,445 33 1206440SF NEXT-GEN OPIR—GROUND 661,367 661,367 34 1206442SF NEXT GENERATION OPIR 222,178 222,178 35 1206443SF NEXT-GEN OPIR—GEO 719,731 719,731 36 1206444SF NEXT-GEN OPIR—POLAR 1,013,478 1,013,478 37 1206445SF COMMERCIAL SATCOM (COMSATCOM) INTEGRATION 73,501 73,501 38 1206446SF RESILIENT MISSILE WARNING MISSILE TRACKING—LOW EARTH ORBIT (LEO) 1,266,437 1,519,222 DAF requested realignment of funds [252,785] 39 1206447SF RESILIENT MISSILE WARNING MISSILE TRACKING—MEDIUM EARTH ORBIT (MEO) 538,208 790,992 DAF requested realignment of funds [252,784] 40 1206448SF RESILIENT MISSILE WARNING MISSILE TRACKING—INTEGRATED GROUND SEGMENT 505,569 0 DAF requested realignment of funds to 6446SF [–252,785] DAF requested realignment of funds to 6447SF [–252,784] 41 1206853SF NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE)—EMD 82,188 82,188 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 6,008,017 6,008,017 MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 43 1203622SF SPACE WARFIGHTING ANALYSIS 3,568 3,568 46 1206392SF ACQ WORKFORCE—SPACE & MISSILE SYSTEMS 258,969 276,500 DAF requested realignment of funds [17,531] 47 1206398SF SPACE & MISSILE SYSTEMS CENTER—MHA 13,694 15,053 DAF requested realignment of funds [1,359] 48 1206601SF SPACE TECHNOLOGY 91,778 0 DAF requested realignment of funds [–91,778] 49 1206759SF MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT—SPACE 146,797 146,797 50 1206860SF ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE) 18,023 18,023 52 1206864SF SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP) 30,192 30,192 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 563,021 490,133 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 55 1203001SF FAMILY OF ADVANCED BLOS TERMINALS (FAB-T) 91,369 91,369 56 1203040SF DCO-SPACE 76,003 76,003 57 1203109SF NARROWBAND SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 230,785 230,785 58 1203110SF SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE) 86,465 86,465 59 1203154SF LONG RANGE KILL CHAINS 243,036 243,036 61 1203173SF SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER 22,039 22,039 62 1203174SF SPACE INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND RAPID TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 41,483 41,483 63 1203182SF SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE) 11,175 11,175 65 1203330SF SPACE SUPERIORITY ISR 28,730 28,730 67 1203873SF BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE RADARS 20,752 28,752 Perimeter Acquisition Radar Attack Characterization System (PARCS) radar [8,000] 68 1203906SF NCMC—TW/AA SYSTEM 25,545 25,545 69 1203913SF NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE) 93,391 93,391 70 1203940SF SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS 264,966 264,966 71 1206423SF GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III—OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT 317,309 317,309 75 1206770SF ENTERPRISE GROUND SERVICES 155,825 155,825 76 1208053SF JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM 14,568 14,568 9999 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 5,764,667 6,225,367 Space Force realignment of funds for classified program [270,000] Space Force Unfunded Priorities List Classified Program B [83,000] Space Force Unfunded Priorities List Classified Program C [53,000] Space Force Unfunded Priorities List Classified Program D [54,700] SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 7,488,108 7,956,808 SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS 78 1208248SF SPACE COMMAND & CONTROL—SOFTWARE PILOT PROGRAM 122,326 122,326 SUBTOTAL SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS 122,326 122,326 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, SF 19,199,340 19,784,119 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW BASIC RESEARCH 1 0601000BR DTRA BASIC RESEARCH 14,761 14,761 2 0601101E DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 311,531 311,531 3 0601108D8Z HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES 16,329 16,329 4 0601110D8Z BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES 71,783 96,783 Defense Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (DEPSCoR) [25,000] 5 0601117E BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE 50,430 50,430 6 0601120D8Z NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM 159,549 169,549 Enhanced civics education program [10,000] 7 0601228D8Z HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES/MINORITY INSTITUTIONS 100,467 100,467 8 0601384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 36,235 36,235 SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH 761,085 796,085 APPLIED RESEARCH 9 0602000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY 19,157 19,157 10 0602115E BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY 141,081 141,081 11 0602128D8Z PROMOTION AND PROTECTION STRATEGIES 3,219 3,219 12 0602230D8Z DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION 55,160 55,160 13 0602234D8Z LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM 46,858 46,858 14 0602251D8Z APPLIED RESEARCH FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF S&T PRIORITIES 66,866 66,866 15 0602303E INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY 333,029 333,029 17 0602384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 240,610 240,610 18 0602668D8Z CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH 17,437 20,437 Semiconductor industry cybersecurity research [3,000] 19 0602675D8Z SOCIAL SCIENCES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY 4,718 4,718 20 0602702E TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY 234,549 234,549 21 0602715E MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY 344,986 344,986 22 0602716E ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY 572,662 572,662 23 0602718BR COUNTER WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION APPLIED RESEARCH 208,870 208,870 24 0602751D8Z SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE (SEI) APPLIED RESEARCH 11,168 11,168 25 0602890D8Z HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH 48,804 48,804 26 0602891D8Z FSRM MODELLING 2,000 2,000 27 1160401BB SOF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 52,287 52,287 SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH 2,403,461 2,406,461 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 28 0603000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 37,706 37,706 29 0603021D8Z NATIONAL SECURITY INNOVATION CAPITAL 15,085 15,085 30 0603121D8Z SO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 30,102 30,102 31 0603122D8Z COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 75,593 105,593 Loitering munition development [5,000] U.S.-Israel defense collaboration on emerging technologies [25,000] 32 0603133D8Z FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING 27,078 27,078 33 0603160BR COUNTER WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 400,947 405,947 Advanced manufacturing of energetic materials [5,000] 34 0603176BR ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT 7,990 7,990 35 0603176C ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT 17,825 17,825 36 0603180C ADVANCED RESEARCH 21,461 21,461 37 0603183D8Z JOINT HYPERSONIC TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT &TRANSITION 52,292 52,292 38 0603225D8Z JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 19,567 19,567 39 0603260BR INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 10,000 10,000 40 0603286E ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS 331,753 331,753 41 0603287E SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY 134,809 134,809 42 0603288D8Z ANALYTIC ASSESSMENTS 24,328 24,328 43 0603289D8Z ADVANCED INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS 55,626 55,626 44 0603330D8Z QUANTUM APPLICATION 75,000 75,000 46 0603342D8Z DEFENSE INNOVATION UNIT (DIU) 104,729 104,729 47 0603375D8Z TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION 123,837 123,837 48 0603379D8Z ADVANCED TECHNICAL INTEGRATION 11,000 11,000 49 0603384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 267,073 292,073 Generative Unconstrained Intelligent Drug Engineering-Enhanced Biodefense [25,000] 50 0603527D8Z RETRACT LARCH 57,401 57,401 51 0603618D8Z JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 19,793 19,793 53 0603662D8Z NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES 11,197 11,197 54 0603680D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 252,965 264,965 Additive manufacturing at scale [7,000] Digital manufacturing modernization [5,000] 55 0603680S MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 46,404 46,404 56 0603712S GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS 16,580 16,580 57 0603716D8Z STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM 60,387 60,387 58 0603720S MICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT 144,707 144,707 59 0603727D8Z JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM 2,749 2,749 60 0603739E ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES 254,033 254,033 61 0603760E COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 321,591 321,591 62 0603766E NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY 885,425 885,425 63 0603767E SENSOR TECHNOLOGY 358,580 358,580 65 0603781D8Z SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE 16,699 16,699 66 0603838D8Z DEFENSE INNOVATION ACCELERATION (DIA) 257,110 257,110 67 0603924D8Z HIGH ENERGY LASER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 111,799 111,799 68 0603941D8Z TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 345,384 345,384 69 0603945D8Z AUKUS INNOVATION INITIATIVES 25,000 25,000 70 0603950D8Z NATIONAL SECURITY INNOVATION NETWORK 21,575 28,575 National Security Innovation Network [7,000] 71 0604055D8Z OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT 171,668 181,668 Increase for tristructural-isotrophic fuel [10,000] 72 1160402BB SOF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 156,097 156,097 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 5,380,945 5,469,945 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 74 0603161D8Z NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E ADC&P 76,764 76,764 75 0603600D8Z WALKOFF 143,486 143,486 76 0603851D8Z ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM 117,196 123,196 Sustainable Technology Evaluation and Demonstration program increase [6,000] 77 0603881C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT 220,311 220,311 78 0603882C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT 903,633 903,633 79 0603884BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—DEM/VAL 316,853 316,853 80 0603884C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS 239,159 239,159 81 0603890C BMD ENABLING PROGRAMS 597,720 597,720 82 0603891C SPECIAL PROGRAMS—MDA 552,888 552,888 83 0603892C AEGIS BMD 693,727 693,727 84 0603896C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATI 554,201 554,201 85 0603898C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT 48,248 48,248 86 0603904C MISSILE DEFENSE INTEGRATION & OPERATIONS CENTER (MDIOC) 50,549 50,549 87 0603906C REGARDING TRENCH 12,564 27,564 Program increase—MDA UFR [15,000] 88 0603907C SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX) 177,868 177,868 89 0603913C ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS 300,000 325,000 U.S.-Israel cooperation on directed energy capabilities [25,000] 90 0603914C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST 360,455 360,455 91 0603915C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS 570,258 580,258 Hypersonic Targets and Countermeasures Program [10,000] 92 0603923D8Z COALITION WARFARE 12,103 12,103 93 0604011D8Z NEXT GENERATION INFORMATION COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY (5G) 179,278 179,278 94 0604016D8Z DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM 3,185 3,185 95 0604102C GUAM DEFENSE DEVELOPMENT 397,578 397,578 97 0604124D8Z CHIEF DIGITAL AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE OFFICER (CDAO)—MIP 34,350 34,350 98 0604181C HYPERSONIC DEFENSE 208,997 208,997 99 0604250D8Z ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES 1,085,826 1,085,826 100 0604294D8Z TRUSTED & ASSURED MICROELECTRONICS 810,839 810,839 101 0604331D8Z RAPID PROTOTYPING PROGRAM 110,291 110,291 102 0604331J RAPID PROTOTYPING PROGRAM 9,880 9,880 104 0604400D8Z DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) UNMANNED SYSTEM COMMON DEVELOPMENT 2,643 2,643 105 0604551BR CATAPULT INFORMATION SYSTEM 8,328 8,328 106 0604555D8Z OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT—NON S&T 53,726 53,726 108 0604682D8Z WARGAMING AND SUPPORT FOR STRATEGIC ANALYSIS (SSA) 3,206 3,206 109 0604790D8Z RAPID DEFENSE EXPERIMENTATION RESERVE (RDER) 79,773 79,773 110 0604826J JOINT C5 CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT, INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY ASSESSMENTS 28,517 28,517 111 0604873C LONG RANGE DISCRIMINATION RADAR (LRDR) 103,517 103,517 112 0604874C IMPROVED HOMELAND DEFENSE INTERCEPTORS 2,130,838 2,130,838 113 0604876C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT TEST 47,577 47,577 114 0604878C AEGIS BMD TEST 193,484 193,484 115 0604879C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSOR TEST 111,049 111,049 116 0604880C LAND-BASED SM–3 (LBSM3) 22,163 22,163 117 0604887C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE SEGMENT TEST 41,824 41,824 118 0202057C SAFETY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 2,484 2,484 119 0208059JCY CYBERCOM ACTIVITIES 65,484 65,484 120 0208085JCY ROBUST INFRASTRUCTURE AND ACCESS 170,182 170,182 121 0208086JCY CYBER TRAINING ENVIRONMENT (CTE) 114,980 114,980 122 0300206R ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS 2,156 2,156 123 0305103C CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE 2,760 2,760 124 0305245D8Z INTELLIGENCE CAPABILITIES AND INNOVATION INVESTMENTS 3,000 3,000 125 0305251JCY CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS FORCES AND FORCE SUPPORT 2,669 2,669 126 0901579D8Z OFFICE OF STRATEGIC CAPITAL (OSC) 99,000 99,000 129 1206895C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS 109,483 109,483 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 12,187,050 12,243,050 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 130 0604123D8Z CHIEF DIGITAL AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE OFFICER (CDAO)—DEM/VAL ACTIVITIES 615,246 615,246 131 0604161D8Z NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E SDD 6,229 6,229 132 0604384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—EMD 382,977 382,977 133 0604771D8Z JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTIDS) 9,775 9,775 134 0605000BR COUNTER WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 14,414 14,414 135 0605013BL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 6,953 6,953 136 0605021SE HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE 9,292 9,292 137 0605022D8Z DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM 18,981 18,981 138 0605027D8Z OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES 5,456 5,456 140 0605080S DEFENSE AGENCY INITIATIVES (DAI)—FINANCIAL SYSTEM 32,629 32,629 141 0605141BR MISSION ASSURANCE RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (MARMS) 9,316 9,316 142 0605210D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES 6,899 6,899 143 0605294D8Z TRUSTED & ASSURED MICROELECTRONICS 297,586 297,586 145 0605772D8Z NUCLEAR COMMAND, CONTROL, & COMMUNICATIONS 4,110 4,110 146 0305304D8Z DOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (EEIM) 8,159 8,159 147 0305310D8Z CWMD SYSTEMS: SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 14,471 14,471 148 0505167D8Z DOMESTIC PREPAREDNESS AGAINST WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION 3,770 3,770 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 1,446,263 1,446,263 MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 149 0603829J JOINT CAPABILITY EXPERIMENTATION 12,402 12,402 150 0604774D8Z DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS) 12,746 12,746 151 0604875D8Z JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT 8,426 8,426 152 0604940D8Z CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT (CTEIP) 833,792 833,792 153 0604942D8Z ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS 5,810 5,810 154 0605001E MISSION SUPPORT 99,090 99,090 155 0605100D8Z JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY (JMETC) 187,421 187,421 156 0605126J JOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION (JIAMDO) 61,477 61,477 158 0605142D8Z SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 39,949 39,949 159 0605151D8Z STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—OSD 6,292 6,292 160 0605161D8Z NUCLEAR MATTERS-PHYSICAL SECURITY 21,043 21,043 161 0605170D8Z SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION 10,504 10,504 162 0605200D8Z GENERAL SUPPORT TO OUSD(INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY) 2,980 2,980 163 0605384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 74,382 74,382 170 0605790D8Z SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR)/ SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 3,831 3,831 171 0605797D8Z MAINTAINING TECHNOLOGY ADVANTAGE 38,923 38,923 172 0605798D8Z DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS 60,404 60,404 173 0605801KA DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC) 65,715 60,715 Information Analysis Centers reduction [–5,000] 174 0605803SE R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING AND EVALUATION 26,037 26,037 175 0605804D8Z DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION 37,353 37,353 176 0605898E MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D 14,833 14,833 177 0605998KA MANAGEMENT HQ—DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC) 3,752 3,752 178 0606005D8Z SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 18,088 18,088 179 0606100D8Z BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS 14,427 14,427 180 0606114D8Z ANALYSIS WORKING GROUP (AWG) SUPPORT 4,200 4,200 181 0606135D8Z CHIEF DIGITAL AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE OFFICER (CDAO) ACTIVITIES 17,247 17,247 182 0606225D8Z ODNA TECHNOLOGY AND RESOURCE ANALYSIS 3,386 3,386 183 0606300D8Z DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD 2,352 2,352 184 0606301D8Z AVIATION SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES 213 213 186 0606771D8Z CYBER RESILIENCY AND CYBERSECURITY POLICY 45,194 45,194 187 0606853BR MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT 11,919 11,919 188 0203345D8Z DEFENSE OPERATIONS SECURITY INITIATIVE (DOSI) 3,112 3,112 189 0204571J JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT 4,916 4,916 190 0208045K C4I INTEROPERABILITY 66,152 66,152 195 0305172K COMBINED ADVANCED APPLICATIONS 5,366 5,366 197 0305208K DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 3,069 3,069 199 0804768J COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANSFORMATION (CE2T2)—NON-MHA 101,319 101,319 200 0808709SE DEFENSE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE (DEOMI) 740 740 201 0901598C MANAGEMENT HQ—MDA 28,363 28,363 202 0903235K JOINT SERVICE PROVIDER (JSP) 5,177 5,177 9999 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 36,315 63,315 All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office [27,000] SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1,998,717 2,020,717 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 203 0604130V ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS) 42,482 42,482 205 0607210D8Z INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT 1,017,141 1,045,141 Domestic advanced microelectronics packaging [5,000] Rapid Innovation Program [20,000] Shipbuilding and ship repair workforce development [3,000] 206 0607310D8Z COUNTERPROLIFERATION SPECIAL PROJECTS: OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 12,713 12,713 207 0607327T GLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (G-TSCMIS) 8,503 8,503 208 0607384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT) 80,495 80,495 209 0208097JCY CYBER COMMAND AND CONTROL (CYBER C2) 95,733 95,733 210 0208099JCY DATA AND UNIFIED PLATFORM (D&UP) 138,558 138,558 214 0302019K DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION 19,299 19,299 215 0303126K LONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DCS 37,726 37,726 216 0303131K MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN) 5,037 5,037 218 0303140D8Z INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 97,171 97,171 220 0303140K INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 8,351 8,351 222 0303153K DEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION 35,995 35,995 223 0303171K JOINT PLANNING AND EXECUTION SERVICES 5,677 5,677 224 0303228K JOINT REGIONAL SECURITY STACKS (JRSS) 3,196 3,196 228 0305104D8Z DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL BASE (DIB) CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE 25,655 25,655 232 0305133V INDUSTRIAL SECURITY ACTIVITIES 2,134 2,134 235 0305146V DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES 2,295 2,295 236 0305172D8Z COMBINED ADVANCED APPLICATIONS 52,736 52,736 239 0305186D8Z POLICY R&D PROGRAMS 6,263 6,263 240 0305199D8Z NET CENTRICITY 23,275 23,275 242 0305208BB DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 6,214 6,214 249 0305327V INSIDER THREAT 2,971 2,971 250 0305387D8Z HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM 1,879 1,879 257 0306250JCY CYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 469,385 480,385 Locked Shield Exercise [4,000] Modernization of Department of Defense Internet Gateway Cyber Defense [7,000] 261 0505167D8Z DOMESTIC PREPAREDNESS AGAINST WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION 1,760 1,760 262 0708012K LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 1,420 1,420 263 0708012S PACIFIC DISASTER CENTERS 1,905 1,905 264 0708047S DEFENSE PROPERTY ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM 3,249 3,249 265 1105219BB MQ–9 UAV 37,188 37,188 267 1160403BB AVIATION SYSTEMS 216,174 216,174 268 1160405BB INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 86,737 86,737 269 1160408BB OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS 216,135 216,135 270 1160431BB WARRIOR SYSTEMS 263,374 280,514 Counter Uncrewed Aerial Systems (CUAS) Group 3 Defeat Acceleration [11,250] Next-Generation Blue Force Tracker [5,890] 271 1160432BB SPECIAL PROGRAMS 529 529 272 1160434BB UNMANNED ISR 6,727 6,727 273 1160480BB SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES 9,335 9,335 274 1160483BB MARITIME SYSTEMS 158,231 158,231 275 1160490BB OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE 15,749 15,749 9999 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 8,463,742 8,463,742 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 11,683,139 11,739,279 SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS 278 0608648D8Z ACQUISITION VISIBILITY—SOFTWARE PILOT PROGRAM 21,355 21,355 279 0303150K GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM 33,166 33,166 9999 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 270,653 270,653 SUBTOTAL SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS 325,174 325,174 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW 36,185,834 36,446,974 OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1 0605118OTE OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION 169,544 169,544 2 0605131OTE LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION 103,252 103,252 3 0605814OTE OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES 58,693 58,693 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 331,489 331,489 TOTAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE 331,489 331,489 TOTAL RDT&E 144,979,625 146,140,912 XLIII OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Line Item FY 2024 Senate OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY OPERATING FORCES 010 MANEUVER UNITS 3,943,409 3,943,409 020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES 225,238 225,238 030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE 947,395 947,395 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 2,449,141 2,449,141 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 1,233,070 1,233,070 060 AVIATION ASSETS 2,046,144 2,046,144 070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 7,149,427 7,149,427 080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS 475,435 475,435 090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE 1,423,560 1,423,560 100 MEDICAL READINESS 951,499 951,499 110 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 9,943,031 9,943,031 120 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 5,381,757 5,381,757 130 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 313,612 313,612 140 ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES 454,565 454,565 150 RESET 447,987 447,987 160 US AFRICA COMMAND 414,680 414,680 170 US EUROPEAN COMMAND 408,529 408,529 180 US SOUTHERN COMMAND 285,692 285,692 190 US FORCES KOREA 88,463 88,463 200 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 507,845 507,845 210 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSECURITY 704,667 704,667 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 39,795,146 39,795,146 MOBILIZATION 230 STRATEGIC MOBILITY 470,143 470,143 240 ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS 433,909 433,909 250 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS 4,244 4,244 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION 908,296 908,296 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 260 OFFICER ACQUISITION 178,428 178,428 270 RECRUIT TRAINING 78,235 78,235 280 ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING 114,777 114,777 290 SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS 551,462 551,462 300 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 1,147,431 1,147,431 310 FLIGHT TRAINING 1,398,415 1,398,415 320 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 200,779 200,779 330 TRAINING SUPPORT 682,896 682,896 340 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 690,280 833,336 Army Enlisted Training Corps [5,000] Recruiting and advertising increase [138,056] 350 EXAMINING 195,009 195,009 360 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 260,235 260,235 370 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING 250,252 250,252 380 JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS 204,895 204,895 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 5,953,094 6,096,150 ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 400 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 718,323 718,323 410 CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES 900,624 900,624 420 LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 828,059 828,059 430 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT 464,029 464,029 440 ADMINISTRATION 537,837 537,837 450 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 1,962,059 1,962,059 460 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT 361,553 361,553 470 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT 829,248 829,248 480 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT 2,370,107 2,370,107 490 ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES 203,323 203,323 500 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT 286,682 286,682 510 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT READINESS 455,928 455,928 520 DEF ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNT 39,867 39,867 530 INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS 610,201 610,201 540 MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS 38,948 38,948 999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 2,291,229 2,291,229 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 12,898,017 12,898,017 UNDISTRIBUTED 998 UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –337,600 Foreign currency fluctuations [–208,000] Unobligated balances [–129,600] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –337,600 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY 59,554,553 59,360,009 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES OPERATING FORCES 010 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES 15,208 15,208 020 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE 720,802 720,802 030 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 143,400 143,400 040 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 707,654 707,654 050 AVIATION ASSETS 134,346 134,346 060 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 451,178 451,178 070 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS 97,564 97,564 080 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE 45,711 45,711 090 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 608,079 608,079 100 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 495,435 495,435 110 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 28,783 28,783 120 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 3,153 3,153 130 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSECURITY 19,591 19,591 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 3,470,904 3,470,904 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 140 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 19,155 19,155 150 ADMINISTRATION 21,668 21,668 160 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 44,118 44,118 170 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT 7,127 7,127 180 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 67,976 74,651 Recruiting and advertising increase [6,675] SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 160,044 166,719 UNDISTRIBUTED 998 UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –14,300 Foreign currency fluctuations [–10,900] Unobligated balances [–3,400] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –14,300 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES 3,630,948 3,623,323 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG OPERATING FORCES 010 MANEUVER UNITS 925,071 925,071 020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES 201,781 201,781 030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE 840,373 840,373 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 107,392 107,392 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 62,908 62,908 060 AVIATION ASSETS 1,113,908 1,113,908 070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 832,946 832,946 080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS 50,696 50,696 090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE 231,784 231,784 100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 1,249,066 1,249,066 110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 1,081,561 1,081,561 120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1,468,857 1,468,857 130 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 9,566 9,566 140 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSECURITY 15,710 15,710 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 8,191,619 8,191,619 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 150 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 7,251 7,251 160 ADMINISTRATION 66,025 66,025 170 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 113,366 113,366 180 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT 8,663 8,663 190 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT 292,426 343,146 Recruiting and advertising increase [50,720] 200 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT 3,754 3,754 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 491,485 542,205 UNDISTRIBUTED 998 UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –52,400 Foreign currency fluctuations [–29,000] Unobligated balances [–23,400] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –52,400 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG 8,683,104 8,681,424 COUNTER ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) COUNTER ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) 010 IRAQ 241,950 241,950 020 SYRIA 156,000 156,000 SUBTOTAL COUNTER ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) 397,950 397,950 TOTAL COUNTER ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) 397,950 397,950 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY OPERATING FORCES 010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS 7,882,504 7,882,504 020 FLEET AIR TRAINING 2,773,957 2,773,957 030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES 73,047 73,047 040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT 213,862 213,862 050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT 1,155,463 1,158,463 Advanced nucleated foam engine performance and restoration program [3,000] 060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE 1,857,021 1,857,021 070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 66,822 66,822 080 AVIATION LOGISTICS 1,871,670 1,871,670 090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS 7,015,796 7,015,796 100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING 1,301,108 1,301,108 110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE 11,164,249 11,164,249 120 SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 2,728,712 2,728,712 130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE 1,776,881 1,776,881 140 SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE 389,915 389,915 150 WARFARE TACTICS 1,005,998 1,005,998 160 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY 455,330 455,330 170 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES 2,350,089 2,356,089 Naval Small Craft Instruction and Technical Training School [6,000] 180 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 189,044 189,044 200 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS 92,504 92,504 210 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT 352,980 352,980 230 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 522,180 522,180 240 FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE 1,763,238 1,763,238 250 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE 1,640,642 1,640,642 260 OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT 696,653 696,653 270 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION 1,780,645 1,780,645 280 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION 4,406,192 4,406,192 290 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 6,223,827 6,271,827 Navy divestment of electrical utility operations at former Naval Air Station Barbers Point [48,000] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 61,750,329 61,807,329 MOBILIZATION 300 SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE 475,255 475,255 310 READY RESERVE FORCE 701,060 701,060 320 SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS 302,930 302,930 330 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS 151,966 151,966 340 COAST GUARD SUPPORT 21,464 21,464 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION 1,652,675 1,652,675 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 350 OFFICER ACQUISITION 201,555 201,555 360 RECRUIT TRAINING 16,521 16,521 370 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS 175,171 175,171 380 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 1,238,894 1,238,894 390 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 335,603 335,603 400 TRAINING SUPPORT 390,931 390,931 410 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 269,483 355,328 Navy Enlisted Training Corps [5,000] Recruiting and advertising increase [80,845] 420 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 90,452 90,452 430 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING 73,406 73,406 440 JUNIOR ROTC 58,970 58,970 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 2,850,986 2,936,831 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 450 ADMINISTRATION 1,350,449 1,350,449 460 CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 242,760 242,760 470 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 745,666 745,666 490 MEDICAL ACTIVITIES 323,978 323,978 500 DEF ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNT 67,357 67,357 510 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 248,822 248,822 530 PLANNING, ENGINEERING, AND PROGRAM SUPPORT 616,816 616,816 540 ACQUISITION, LOGISTICS, AND OVERSIGHT 850,906 850,906 550 INVESTIGATIVE AND SECURITY SERVICES 888,508 888,508 999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 655,281 655,281 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 5,990,543 5,990,543 UNDISTRIBUTED 998 UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –498,400 Foreign currency fluctuations [–236,300] Unobligated balances [–262,100] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –498,400 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY 72,244,533 71,888,978 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS OPERATING FORCES 010 OPERATIONAL FORCES 1,799,964 1,799,964 020 FIELD LOGISTICS 1,878,228 1,878,228 030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE 211,460 211,460 040 MARITIME PREPOSITIONING 137,831 137,831 060 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 205,449 205,449 070 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 1,211,183 1,211,183 080 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 3,124,551 3,124,551 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 8,568,666 8,568,666 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 090 RECRUIT TRAINING 26,284 26,284 100 OFFICER ACQUISITION 1,316 1,316 110 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 133,176 133,176 120 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 66,213 66,213 130 TRAINING SUPPORT 570,152 570,152 140 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 246,586 300,903 Marine Corps Enlisted Training Corps [5,000] Recruiting and advertising increase [49,317] 150 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 55,230 55,230 160 JUNIOR ROTC 29,616 29,616 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 1,128,573 1,182,890 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 180 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 90,366 90,366 190 ADMINISTRATION 428,650 428,650 999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 65,658 65,658 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 584,674 584,674 UNDISTRIBUTED 998 UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –108,900 Foreign currency fluctuations [–33,800] Unobligated balances [–75,100] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –108,900 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS 10,281,913 10,227,330 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES OPERATING FORCES 010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS 731,113 731,113 020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE 10,122 10,122 030 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE 167,811 167,811 040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 103 103 050 AVIATION LOGISTICS 29,185 29,185 060 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 20,806 20,806 070 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES 186,590 186,590 080 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 296 296 090 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION 32,467 32,467 100 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION 63,726 63,726 110 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 121,064 121,064 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 1,363,283 1,363,283 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 120 ADMINISTRATION 2,025 2,025 130 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 13,401 13,401 140 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 2,101 2,101 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 17,527 17,527 UNDISTRIBUTED 998 UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –8,100 Foreign currency fluctuations [–3,900] Unobligated balances [–4,200] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –8,100 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES 1,380,810 1,372,710 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 010 OPERATING FORCES 128,468 128,468 020 DEPOT MAINTENANCE 20,967 20,967 030 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION 46,589 46,589 040 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 120,808 120,808 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 316,832 316,832 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 050 ADMINISTRATION 12,563 12,563 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 12,563 12,563 UNDISTRIBUTED 998 UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –4,900 Foreign currency fluctuations [–3,900] Unobligated balances [–1,000] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –4,900 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE 329,395 324,495 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE OPERATING FORCES 010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES 980,768 966,068 DAF requested realignment of funds [–14,700] 020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES 2,665,924 2,665,924 030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS) 1,630,552 1,630,552 040 DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 4,632,693 4,632,693 050 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 4,252,815 4,194,663 DAF requested realignment of funds [–58,152] 060 CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT 229,440 229,440 070 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT 9,537,192 9,537,192 080 FLYING HOUR PROGRAM 6,697,549 6,697,549 090 BASE SUPPORT 11,633,510 11,425,018 DAF requested realignment of funds [–223,192] DAF requested realignment of funds from SAG 11A [14,700] 100 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING 1,350,827 1,319,876 DAF requested realignment of funds [–30,951] 110 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS 1,817,941 1,817,941 120 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 807,966 807,966 130 TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 267,615 267,615 160 US NORTHCOM/NORAD 245,263 245,263 170 US STRATCOM 541,720 541,720 190 US CENTCOM 335,220 329,220 Office of Security Cooperation-Iraq reduction [–6,000] 200 US SOCOM 27,511 27,511 210 US TRANSCOM 607 607 220 CENTCOM CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT 1,415 1,415 230 USSPACECOM 373,989 373,989 240 MEDICAL READINESS 564,880 562,596 DAF requested realignment of funds [–2,284] 999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 1,465,926 1,465,926 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 51,527,249 51,206,670 MOBILIZATION 260 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS 3,012,287 3,012,287 270 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS 241,918 241,918 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION 3,254,205 3,254,205 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 280 OFFICER ACQUISITION 202,769 202,769 290 RECRUIT TRAINING 28,892 28,892 300 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) 137,647 137,647 310 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 588,131 588,131 320 FLIGHT TRAINING 875,230 875,230 330 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 301,262 301,262 340 TRAINING SUPPORT 194,609 194,609 350 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 204,318 250,182 Air Force Enlisted Training Corps [5,000] Recruiting and advertising increase [40,864] 360 EXAMINING 7,775 7,775 370 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 263,421 263,421 380 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING 343,039 343,039 390 JUNIOR ROTC 75,666 75,666 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 3,222,759 3,268,623 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 400 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS 1,062,199 1,062,199 410 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 162,919 162,919 420 ADMINISTRATION 1,409,015 1,409,015 430 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 30,268 30,268 440 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 1,851,856 1,856,376 DAF requested realignment of funds [4,520] 450 CIVIL AIR PATROL 30,901 30,901 460 DEF ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNT 42,759 42,759 480 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT 115,267 115,267 999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 1,506,624 1,506,624 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 7,718,432 7,722,952 UNDISTRIBUTED 998 UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –442,200 Foreign currency fluctuations [–208,500] Unobligated balances [–233,700] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –442,200 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE 65,722,645 65,010,250 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, SPACE FORCE OPERATING FORCES 010 GLOBAL C3I & EARLY WARNING 642,201 642,201 020 SPACE LAUNCH OPERATIONS 356,162 356,162 030 SPACE OPERATIONS 866,547 866,547 040 EDUCATION & TRAINING 199,181 217,353 DAF requested realignment of funds [18,172] 050 SPECIAL PROGRAMS 383,233 383,233 060 DEPOT MAINTENANCE 67,757 67,757 070 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 678,648 678,648 080 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS AND SYSTEM SUPPORT 1,380,350 1,380,350 090 SPACE OPERATIONS -BOS 188,760 188,760 999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 71,475 71,475 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 4,834,314 4,852,486 ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE WIDE ACTIVITIES 100 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS 34,046 34,046 110 ADMINISTRATION 149,108 130,936 DAF requested realignment of funds [–18,172] SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE WIDE ACTIVITIES 183,154 164,982 UNDISTRIBUTED 998 UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –87,100 Foreign currency fluctuations [–14,100] Unobligated balances [–73,000] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –87,100 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, SPACE FORCE 5,017,468 4,930,368 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES 2,088,949 2,116,429 Military technician (dual status) end strength [27,480] 020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 198,213 198,213 030 DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 647,758 647,758 040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 122,314 122,314 050 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT 374,442 374,442 060 BASE SUPPORT 543,962 543,962 070 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 1,742 1,742 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 3,977,380 4,004,860 ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 080 ADMINISTRATION 107,281 107,281 090 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 9,373 11,248 Recruiting and advertising increase [1,875] 100 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC) 15,563 15,563 110 OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP) 6,174 6,174 120 AUDIOVISUAL 485 485 SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 138,876 140,751 UNDISTRIBUTED 998 UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –46,700 Foreign currency fluctuations [–12,500] Unobligated balances [–34,200] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –46,700 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE 4,116,256 4,098,911 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG OPERATING FORCES 010 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS 2,498,675 2,498,675 020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 656,714 796,394 Military technician (dual status) end strength [139,680] 030 DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1,171,901 1,171,901 040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 370,188 370,188 050 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT 1,280,003 1,280,003 060 BASE SUPPORT 1,089,579 1,089,579 070 CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT 19,708 19,708 080 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 49,476 49,476 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 7,136,244 7,275,924 ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES 090 ADMINISTRATION 68,417 68,417 100 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 49,033 72,433 Recruiting and advertising increase [23,400] SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES 117,450 140,850 UNDISTRIBUTED 998 UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –46,200 Foreign currency fluctuations [–24,300] Unobligated balances [–21,900] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –46,200 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG 7,253,694 7,370,574 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE OPERATING FORCES 010 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF 461,370 457,770 Unobligated balances [–3,600] 020 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF—JTEEP 701,081 701,081 030 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF—CYBER 8,210 8,210 040 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE—MISO 252,480 252,480 060 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND COMBAT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES 2,012,953 2,012,953 070 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND MAINTENANCE 1,210,930 1,206,930 MQ–9 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle unjustified increase [–4,000] 080 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND MANAGEMENT/OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 202,574 202,574 090 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND THEATER FORCES 3,346,004 3,351,004 Special Operations Forces cyber training [5,000] 100 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 49,757 49,757 110 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND INTELLIGENCE 1,391,402 1,391,402 120 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND OPERATIONAL SUPPORT 1,438,967 1,438,967 130 CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 1,318,614 1,328,614 Modernization of Department of Defense Internet Gateway Cyber Defense [10,000] 140 USCYBERCOM HEADQUARTERS 332,690 332,690 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 12,727,032 12,734,432 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 150 DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY 183,342 183,342 160 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF 118,172 118,172 170 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 33,855 33,855 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 335,369 335,369 ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 180 CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS 142,240 139,740 Unobligated balances [–2,500] 190 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY—CYBER 4,870 4,870 200 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY 667,943 665,243 Unobligated balances [–2,700] 210 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY 1,567,119 1,551,619 Unobligated balances [–15,500] 220 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY—CYBER 30,279 20,279 Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification program reduction [–10,000] 230 DEFENSE COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY AGENCY 1,062,123 1,062,123 250 DEFENSE COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY AGENCY—CYBER 9,835 9,835 260 DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY—CYBER 27,517 27,517 270 DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY 1,033,789 1,033,789 300 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY 2,567,698 2,557,798 Unobligated balances [–9,900] 310 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY—CYBER 526,893 526,893 320 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY 241,779 219,379 Unobligated balances [–22,400] 330 DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY 446,731 446,731 340 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY 246,840 246,840 360 DEFENSE POW/MIA OFFICE 195,959 195,959 370 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY 2,379,100 2,389,100 Irregular Warfare Functional Center [10,000] 380 DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 41,722 41,722 390 DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY 984,272 984,272 410 DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY—CYBER 70,548 70,548 420 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY 3,451,625 3,531,625 Impact Aid [50,000] Impact Aid for children with severe disabilities [30,000] 430 MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY 564,078 564,078 440 OFFICE OF THE LOCAL DEFENSE COMMUNITY COOPERATION 118,216 138,216 Defense Manufacturing Community Support Program [20,000] 480 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE—CYBER 92,176 92,176 490 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 2,676,416 2,718,116 Bien Hoa dioxin cleanup [15,000] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Nation-wide human health assessment [5,000] Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration program [20,200] United States Telecommunications Training Institute [1,500] 530 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES 440,947 440,947 999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 20,114,447 20,114,447 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 39,705,162 39,793,862 TOTAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE 52,767,563 52,863,663 UNDISTRIBUTED OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE 997 UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –51,000 Program reduction—USSOCOM [–51,000] 998 UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –15,000 Unobligated balances [–15,000] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –66,000 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE 0 –66,000 MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEF 010 US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE 16,620 16,620 SUBTOTAL US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEF 16,620 16,620 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 16,620 16,620 MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER, AND CIVIC AID 010 OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID 114,900 114,900 SUBTOTAL OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER, AND CIVIC AID 114,900 114,900 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 114,900 114,900 MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ACCOUNT 010 COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 350,999 350,999 SUBTOTAL COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ACCOUNT 350,999 350,999 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 350,999 350,999 MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT 010 ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD 54,977 54,977 SUBTOTAL ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT 54,977 54,977 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 54,977 54,977 MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY 050 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY 198,760 198,760 SUBTOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY 198,760 198,760 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 198,760 198,760 MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY 060 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY 335,240 335,240 SUBTOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY 335,240 335,240 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 335,240 335,240 MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE 070 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE 349,744 349,744 SUBTOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE 349,744 349,744 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 349,744 349,744 MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE 080 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE 8,965 8,965 SUBTOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE 8,965 8,965 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 8,965 8,965 MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES 090 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES 232,806 232,806 SUBTOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES 232,806 232,806 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 232,806 232,806 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE 293,043,843 291,746,996 XLIV MILITARY PERSONNEL 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL Item FY 2024 Senate MILITARY PERSONNEL MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS 168,320,510 166,779,670 Air Force end strength underexecution [–564,000] Air National Guard AGR end strength underexecution [–45,600] Air National Reserve AGR end strength underexecution [–8,040] Navy end strength underexecution [–600,000] Unobligated balances [–323,200] SUBTOTAL MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS 168,320,510 166,779,670 MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH CARE FUND CONTRIBUTIONS MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH CARE FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 10,553,456 10,553,456 SUBTOTAL MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH CARE FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 10,553,456 10,553,456 TOTAL MILITARY PERSONNEL 178,873,966 177,333,126 XLV OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS Line Item FY 2024 Senate WORKING CAPITAL FUND WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY 010 INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS 27,551 27,551 020 SUPPLY MANAGEMENT—ARMY 1,662 1,662 SUBTOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY 29,213 29,213 WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE 020 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 83,587 83,587 SUBTOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE 83,587 83,587 NATIONAL DEFENSE STOCKPILE TRANSACTION FUND 010 DEFENSE STOCKPILE 7,629 7,629 SUBTOTAL NATIONAL DEFENSE STOCKPILE TRANSACTION FUND 7,629 7,629 WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE 010 DEFENSE AUTOMATION & PRODUCTION SERVICES 4 4 040 ENERGY MANAGEMENT—DEF 114,663 114,663 SUBTOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE 114,667 114,667 WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA 010 WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA 1,447,612 1,447,612 SUBTOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA 1,447,612 1,447,612 TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND 1,682,708 1,682,708 CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION OPERATION & MAINTENANCE 1 CHEM DEMILITARIZATION—O&M 89,284 89,284 SUBTOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE 89,284 89,284 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 2 CHEM DEMILITARIZATION—RDT&E 1,002,560 1,002,560 SUBTOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 1,002,560 1,002,560 TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION 1,091,844 1,091,844 DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF DRUG INTRDCTN 010 COUNTER-NARCOTICS SUPPORT 643,848 643,848 SUBTOTAL DRUG INTRDCTN 643,848 643,848 DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM 020 DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM 134,313 134,313 SUBTOTAL DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM 134,313 134,313 NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG PROGRAM 030 NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG PROGRAM 102,272 102,272 SUBTOTAL NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG PROGRAM 102,272 102,272 NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG SCHOOLS 040 NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG SCHOOLS 5,993 5,993 SUBTOTAL NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG SCHOOLS 5,993 5,993 TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF 886,426 886,426 OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 010 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 518,919 518,919 020 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 1,948 1,948 030 RDT&E 3,400 3,400 040 PROCUREMENT 1,098 1,098 SUBTOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 520,867 520,867 SUBTOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 3,400 3,400 SUBTOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 1,098 1,098 TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 525,365 525,365 DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM OPERATION & MAINTENANCE 010 IN-HOUSE CARE 10,044,342 10,044,342 020 PRIVATE SECTOR CARE 19,893,028 19,893,028 030 CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT 2,007,012 2,007,012 040 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 2,327,816 2,327,816 050 MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES 347,446 347,446 060 EDUCATION AND TRAINING 336,111 336,111 070 BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS 2,144,551 2,144,551 SUBTOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE 37,100,306 37,100,306 RDT&E 080 R&D RESEARCH 40,311 40,311 090 R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT 178,892 178,892 100 R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 327,040 327,040 110 R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION 172,351 172,351 120 R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT 107,753 107,753 130 R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT 87,096 87,096 140 R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT 18,330 18,330 SUBTOTAL RDT&E 931,773 931,773 PROCUREMENT 150 PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING 22,344 22,344 160 PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION 238,435 238,435 170 PROC JOINT OPERATIONAL MEDICINE INFORMATION SYSTEM 29,537 29,537 180 PROC MILITARY HEALTH SYSTEM—DESKTOP TO DATACENTER 74,055 74,055 190 PROC DOD HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MODERNIZATION 17,510 17,510 SUBTOTAL PROCUREMENT 381,881 381,881 TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 38,413,960 38,413,960 TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 42,600,303 42,600,303 XLVI MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION Account State/Country and Installation Project Title FY 2024 Senate MILITARY CONSTRUCTION ARMY Alabama Army Anniston Army Depot OPEN STORAGE (P&D) 0 270 Army Redstone Arsenal SUBSTATION 50,000 50,000 Alaska Army Fort Wainwright COST TO COMPLETE: ENLISTED UNACCOMPANIED PERS HSG 34,000 34,000 Army Fort Wainwright SOLDER PERFORMANCE READINESS CENTER (P&D) 0 7,900 Georgia Army Fort Eisenhower CYBER INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITY (CLASSROOMS) 163,000 73,000 Germany Army Grafenwoehr AUTOMATED MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE 10,400 10,400 Army Hohenfels SIMULATIONS CENTER 56,000 56,000 Hawaii Army Aliamanu Military Reservation WATER STORAGE TANK 20,000 20,000 Army Fort Shafter CLEARWELL AND BOOSTER PUMP 0 23,000 Army Helemano Military Reservation WELLS AND STORAGE TANK 0 33,000 Army Schofield Barracks ELEVATED TANK AND DISTRIBUTION LINE 0 21,000 Army Schofield Barracks WATER STORAGE TANK 0 16,000 Army Wheeler Army Airfield AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER (P&D) 0 5,400 Indiana Army Crane Army Ammunition Plant EARTH COVERED MAGAZINES (P&D) 0 1,195 Kansas Army Fort Riley AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER (P&D) 0 1,600 Army Fort Riley AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGER 105,000 105,000 Kentucky Army Blue Grass Army Depot SMALL ARMS MODERNIZATION (P&D) 0 3,300 Army Fort Campbell AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER (P&D) 0 2,500 Army Fort Campbell MULTIPURPOSE TRAINING RANGE 38,000 38,000 Army Fort Knox MIDDLE SCHOOL ADDITION (P&D) 0 6,600 Kwajalein Army Kwajalein Atoll COST TO COMPLETE: PIER 0 15,000 Louisiana Army Fort Johnson MULTIPURPOSE ATHLETIC FIELD 0 13,400 Massachusetts Army Soldier Systems Center Natick BARRACKS ADDITION 18,500 18,500 Michigan Army Detroit Arsenal GROUND TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT BUILDING 72,000 72,000 New Mexico Army White Sands Missile Range J-DETC DIRECTED ENERGY FACILITY (P&D) 0 5,500 New York Army Watervliet Arsenal TANK FARM (P&D) 0 160 North Carolina Army Fort Liberty AUTOMATED RECORD FIRE RANGE 19,500 19,500 Army Fort Liberty BARRACKS 50,000 50,000 Army Fort Liberty BARRACKS (FACILITY PROTOTYPING) 85,000 85,000 Oklahoma Army McAlester Army Ammunition Plant WATER TREATMENT PLANT (P&D) 0 1,194 Pennsylvania Army Letterkenny Army Depot ANECHOIC CHAMBER (P&D) 0 275 Army Letterkenny Army Depot GUIDED MISSILE MAINTENANCE BUILDING 89,000 89,000 Army Tobyhanna Army Depot HELIPAD (P&D) 0 311 Army Tobyhanna Army Depot RADAR MAINTENANCE SHOP (P&D) 0 259 Poland Army Various Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 0 25,710 South Carolina Army Fort Jackson COST TO COMPLETE: RECEPTION BARRACKS COMPLEX, PHASE 2 0 66,000 Texas Army Fort Bliss RAIL YARD 74,000 74,000 Army Fort Cavazos BARRACKS (P&D) 0 20,000 Army Fort Cavazos TACTICAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FACILITIES (P&D) 0 5,800 Army Red River Army Depot COMPONENT REBUILD SHOP 113,000 46,400 Army Red River Army Depot NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING FACILITY (P&D) 0 280 Army Red River Army Depot STANDBY GENERATOR (P&D) 0 270 Virginia Army Fort Belvoir EQUINE TRAINING FACILITY (P&D) 0 4,000 Washington Army Joint Base Lewis-McChord BARRACKS 100,000 100,000 Army Joint Base Lewis-McChord VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP (P&D) 0 7,500 Worldwide Unspecified Army Unspecified Worldwide BARRACKS REPLACEMENT FUND 0 50,000 Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations HOST NATION SUPPORT 26,000 26,000 Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations MINOR CONSTRUCTION 76,280 76,280 Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 270,875 270,875 Subtotal Military Construction, Army 1,470,555 1,651,379 NAVY Australia Navy Royal Australian Air Force Base Darwin PDI: AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON (INC) 134,624 134,624 California Navy Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms COMMUNICATIONS TOWERS 42,100 42,100 Navy Port Hueneme LABORATORY COMPOUND FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS 110,000 15,000 Connecticut Navy Naval Submarine Base New London SUBMARINE PIER 31 EXTENSION 112,518 36,718 Navy Naval Submarine Base New London WEAPONS MAGAZINE & ORDNANCE OPERATIONS FAC. 219,200 19,200 District of Columbia Navy Marine Barracks Washington BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS & SUPPORT FACILITY 131,800 16,800 Djibouti Navy Camp Lemonnier ELECTRICAL POWER PLANT 0 20,000 Florida Navy Naval Air Station Whiting Field AHTS HANGAR 0 50,000 Guam Navy Andersen Air Force Base PDI: CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER 105,220 55,220 Navy Andersen Air Force Base PDI: JOINT CONSOL. COMM. CENTER (INC) 107,000 107,000 Navy Joint Region Marianas PDI: JOINT COMMUNICATION UPGRADE (INC) 292,830 31,330 Navy Joint Region Marianas PDI: MISSILE INTEGRATION TEST FACILITY 174,540 44,540 Navy Naval Base Guam PDI: 9TH ESB TRAINING COMPLEX 23,380 23,380 Navy Naval Base Guam PDI: ARTILLERY BATTERY FACILITIES 137,550 67,550 Navy Naval Base Guam PDI: CONSOLIDATED MEB HQ/NCIS PHII 19,740 19,740 Navy Naval Base Guam PDI: RECREATION CENTER 34,740 34,740 Navy Naval Base Guam PDI: RELIGIOUS MINISTRY SERVICES FACILITY 46,350 46,350 Navy Naval Base Guam PDI: SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY (INC) 166,159 56,159 Navy Naval Base Guam PDI: TRAINING CENTER 89,640 89,640 Hawaii Navy Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam DRY DOCK 3 REPLACEMENT (INC) 1,318,711 1,318,711 Navy Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam WATERFRONT PRODUCTION FACILITY (P&D) 0 60,000 Navy Marine Corps Base Kaneohe Bay WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY COMPLIANCE UPGRADE 0 40,000 Italy Navy Naval Air Station Sigonella EDI: ORDNANCE MAGAZINES 77,072 77,072 Maine Navy Portsmouth Naval Shipyard MULTI-MISSION DRYDOCK #1 EXTENSION (INC) 544,808 544,808 Maryland Navy Fort Meade CYBERSECURITY OPERATIONS FACILITY 186,480 60,580 Navy Naval Air Station Patuxent River AIRCRAFT DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES 141,700 62,000 North Carolina Navy Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point 2D LAAD MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS FACILITIES 0 50,000 Navy Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR (INC) 19,529 19,529 Navy Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point MAINTENANCE FACILITY & MARINE AIR GROUP HQS 125,150 40,150 Navy Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune 10TH MARINES MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS COMPLEX 0 20,000 Navy Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune CORROSION REPAIR FACILITY REPLACEMENT 0 20,000 Pennsylvania Navy Naval Surface Warfare Center Philadelphia AI MACHINERY CONTROL DEVELOPMENT CENTER 0 88,200 Virginia Navy Dam Neck Annex MARITIME SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM FACILITY 109,680 109,680 Navy Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek—Fort Story CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER 35,000 35,000 Navy Marine Corps Base Quantico WATER TREATMENT PLANT 127,120 37,120 Navy Naval Station Norfolk CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER 43,600 43,600 Navy Naval Station Norfolk MQ–25 AIRCRAFT LAYDOWN FACILITIES 114,495 11,495 Navy Naval Station Norfolk SUBMARINE PIER 3 (INC) 99,077 99,077 Navy Naval Weapons Station Yorktown WEAPONS MAGAZINES 221,920 46,920 Navy Norfolk Naval Shipyard DRY DOCK SALTWATER SYSTEM FOR CVN–78 (INC) 81,082 81,082 Washington Navy Naval Base Kitsap ALTERNATE POWER TRANSMISSION LINE 0 19,000 Navy Naval Base Kitsap ARMORED FIGHTING VEHICLE SUPPORT FACILITY 0 31,000 Navy Naval Base Kitsap SHIPYARD ELECTRICAL BACKBONE 195,000 15,000 Worldwide Unspecified Navy Unspecified Worldwide BARRACKS REPLACEMENT FUND 0 75,000 Navy Unspecified Worldwide INDOPACOM PLANNING & DESIGN 0 69,000 Navy Unspecified Worldwide SIOP (P&D) 0 50,000 Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 578,942 578,942 Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 21,000 21,000 Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 34,430 34,430 Subtotal Military Construction, Navy 6,022,187 4,668,487 AIR FORCE Alaska Air Force Eielson Air Force Base CONSOLIDATED MUNITIONS COMPLEX (P&D) 0 1,200 Air Force Eielson Air Force Base JOINT PACIFIC ALASKA RANGE COMPLEX (JPARC) OPS FACILITY (P&D) 0 1,100 Air Force Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson EXTEND RUNWAY 16/34 (INC 3) 107,500 107,500 Air Force Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson PRECISION GUIDED MISSILE COMPLEX (P&D) 0 6,100 Arizona Air Force Luke Air Force Base GILA BEND (P&D) 0 2,600 Australia Air Force Royal Australian Air Force Base Darwin PDI: SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY 26,000 26,000 Air Force Royal Australian Air Force Base Tindal PDI: AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE SUPPORT FACILITY 17,500 17,500 Air Force Royal Australian Air Force Base Tindal PDI: SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY 20,000 20,000 Air Force Royal Australian Air Force Base Tindal PDI: BOMBER APRON 93,000 93,000 Florida Air Force MacDill Air Force Base KC–46A ADAL AIRCRAFT CORROSION CONTROL 25,000 25,000 Air Force MacDill Air Force Base KC–46A ADAL AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 27,000 27,000 Air Force MacDill Air Force Base KC–46A ADAL APRON & HYDRANT FUELING PITS 61,000 61,000 Air Force MacDill Air Force Base KC–46A ADAL FUEL SYSTEM MAINTENANCE DOCK 18,000 18,000 Air Force Patrick Space Force Base COMMERCIAL VEHICLE INSPECTION 15,000 15,000 Air Force Patrick Space Force Base COST TO COMPLETE: CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS CENTER 15,000 15,000 Air Force Patrick Space Force Base FINAL DENIAL BARRIERS, SOUTH GATE 12,000 12,000 Air Force Tyndall Air Force Base NATURAL DISASTER RECOVERY 0 252,000 Georgia Air Force Robins Air Force Base BATTLE MANAGEMENT COMBINED OPERATIONS COMPLEX 115,000 115,000 Guam Air Force Joint Region Marianas PDI: NORTH AIRCRAFT PARKING RAMP (INC) 109,000 109,000 Japan Air Force Kadena Air Base PDI: HELO RESCUE OPS MAINTENANCE HANGAR (INC 3) 46,000 46,000 Air Force Kadena Air Base PDI: THEATER A/C CORROSION CONTROL CTR (INC) 42,000 42,000 Louisiana Air Force Barksdale Air Force Base CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER (P&D) 0 2,000 Air Force Barksdale Air Force Base DORMITORY (P&D) 0 7,000 Air Force Barksdale Air Force Base WEAPONS GENERATION FACILITY (INC 3) 112,000 112,000 Mariana Islands Air Force Tinian PDI: AIRFIELD DEVELOPMENT, PHASE 1 (INC 3) 26,000 26,000 Air Force Tinian PDI: FUEL TANKS W/PIPELINE & HYDRANT (INC 3) 20,000 20,000 Air Force Tinian PDI: PARKING APRON (INC 3) 32,000 32,000 Massachusetts Air Force Hanscom Air Force Base CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER 37,000 37,000 Air Force Hanscom Air Force Base MIT-LINCOLN LAB (WEST LAB CSL/MIF) (INC 4) 70,000 70,000 Mississippi Air Force Columbus Air Force Base T–7A GROUND BASED TRAINING SYSTEM FACILITY 30,000 30,000 Air Force Columbus Air Force Base T–7A UNIT MAINTENANCE TRAINING FACILITY 9,500 9,500 Air Force Keesler Air Force Base AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER (P&D) 0 2,000 Nebraska Air Force Offutt Air Force Base 55 CES MAINTENANCE/WAREHOUSE (P&D) 0 4,500 Air Force Offutt Air Force Base BASE OPERATIONS/MOBILITY CENTER (P&D) 0 5,000 Air Force Offutt Air Force Base LOGISTICS READINESS SQUADRON TRANSPORTATION FACILITY (P&D) 0 3,500 Nevada Air Force Nellis Air Force Base F–35 COALITION HANGAR (P&D) 0 5,500 Air Force Nellis Air Force Base F–35 DATA LAB SUPPORT FACILITY (P&D) 0 700 New Mexico Air Force Cannon Air Force Base SATELLITE FIRE STATION (P&D) 0 5,000 Air Force Kirtland Air Force Base COST TO COMPLETE: WYOMING GATE UPGRADE FOR ANTITERRORISM COMPLIANCE 0 24,400 Norway Air Force Rygge Air Station EDI: DABS-FEV STORAGE 88,000 88,000 Air Force Rygge Air Station EDI: MUNITIONS STORAGE AREA 31,000 31,000 Ohio Air Force Wright-Patterson Air Force Base ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT COMPLEX PHASE V (P&D) 0 19,500 Oklahoma Air Force Tinker Air Force Base KC–46 3–BAY DEPOT MAINTENANCE HANGAR (INC 3) 78,000 78,000 Air Force Vance Air Force Base CONSOLIDATED UNDERGRADUATE PILOT TRAINING CENTER (P&D) 0 8,400 Philippines Air Force Cesar Basa Air Base PDI: TRANSIENT AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON 35,000 35,000 South Dakota Air Force Ellsworth Air Force Base B–21 FUEL SYSTEM MAINTENANCE DOCK 75,000 75,000 Air Force Ellsworth Air Force Base B–21 PHASE HANGAR 160,000 160,000 Air Force Ellsworth Air Force Base B–21 WEAPONS GENERATION FACILITY (INC) 160,000 160,000 Spain Air Force Morón Air Base EDI: MUNITIONS STORAGE 26,000 26,000 Texas Air Force Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER 20,000 20,000 United Kingdom Air Force Royal Air Force Fairford COST TO COMPLETE: EDI DABS-FEV STORAGE 0 28,000 Air Force Royal Air Force Fairford COST TO COMPLETE: EDI MUNITIONS HOLDING AREA 0 20,000 Air Force Royal Air Force Fairford EDI: RADR STORAGE FACILITY 47,000 47,000 Air Force Royal Air Force Lakenheath EDI: RADR STORAGE FACILITY 28,000 28,000 Air Force Royal Air Force Lakenheath SURETY DORMITORY 50,000 50,000 Utah Air Force Hill Air Force Base F–35 T–7A EAST CAMPUS INFRASTRUCTURE 82,000 82,000 Worldwide Unspecified Air Force Unspecified Worldwide BARRACKS REPLACEMENT FUND 0 50,000 Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations EDI: PLANNING & DESIGN 5,648 5,648 Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 338,985 338,985 Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 90,281 90,281 Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations UNSPECIFIED MINOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 64,900 64,900 Wyoming Air Force F.E. Warren Air Force Base COST TO COMPLETE: CONSOLIDATED HELO/TRF OPS/AMU AND ALERT FACILITY 0 18,000 Air Force F.E. Warren Air Force Base GBSD INTEGRATED COMMAND CENTER (INC 2) 27,000 27,000 Air Force F.E. Warren Air Force Base GBSD INTEGRATED TRAINING CENTER 85,000 85,000 Air Force F.E. Warren Air Force Base GBSD MISSILE HANDLING COMPLEX (INC 2) 28,000 28,000 Subtotal Military Construction, Air Force 2,605,314 3,071,814 DEFENSE-WIDE Alabama Defense-Wide Redstone Arsenal GROUND TEST FACILITY INFRASTRUCTURE 147,975 77,975 California Defense-Wide Marine Corps Air Station Miramar AMBULATORY CARE CENTER—DENTAL CLINIC ADD//ALT 103,000 20,600 Defense-Wide Marine Corps Air Station Miramar ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE, ON-SITE GENERATION, AND MICROGRID IMPROVEMENTS 0 30,550 Defense-Wide Monterey COST TO COMPLETE: COGEN PLANT AT B236 0 5,460 Defense-Wide Naval Base Coronado COST TO COMPLETE: ATC OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITY 0 11,400 Defense-Wide Naval Base Coronado SOF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITY, PHASE 2 0 51,000 Defense-Wide Naval Base San Diego AMBULATORY CARE CENTER—DENTAL CLINIC REPLMT 101,644 22,185 Defense-Wide Naval Base San Diego MICROGRID AND BACKUP POWER 0 6,300 Defense-Wide Naval Base Ventura County COST TO COMPLETE: GROUND MOUNTED SOLAR PV 0 16,840 Defense-Wide Vandenberg Space Force Base MICROGRID WITH BACKUP POWER 0 57,000 Colorado Defense-Wide Buckley Space Force Base REDUNDANT ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 0 9,000 Defense-Wide Buckley Space Force Base REPLACEMENT WATER WELL 0 5,700 Cuba Defense-Wide Guantanamo Bay Naval Station AMBULATORY CARE CENTER (INC 1) 60,000 60,000 Delaware Defense-Wide Dover Air Force Base ARMED SERVICES WHOLE BLOOD PROCESSING LABORATORY 0 30,500 Djibouti Defense-Wide Camp Lemonnier COST TO COMPLETE: ENHANCE ENERGY SECURITY AND CONTROL SYSTEMS 0 5,200 Georgia Defense-Wide Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE 2 0 49,500 Germany Defense-Wide Baumholder HUMAN PERFORMANCE TRAINING CENTER 0 16,700 Defense-Wide Baumholder SOF COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITY 41,000 41,000 Defense-Wide Baumholder SOF JOINT PARACHUTE RIGGING FACILITY 23,000 23,000 Defense-Wide Kaiserslautern Air Base KAISERSLAUTERN MIDDLE SCHOOL 21,275 21,275 Defense-Wide Ramstein Air Base RAMSTEIN MIDDLE SCHOOL 181,764 181,764 Defense-Wide Rhine Ordnance Barracks MEDICAL CENTER REPLACEMENT (INC 11) 77,210 77,210 Defense-Wide Stuttgart ROBINSON BARRACKS ELEM SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 8,000 8,000 Hawaii Defense-Wide Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam COST TO COMPLETE: FY20 500 KW PV COVERED PARKING EV CHARGING STATION 0 7,476 Defense-Wide Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam COST TO COMPLETE: PRIMARY ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION 0 13,040 Honduras Defense-Wide Soto Cano Air Base FUEL FACILITIES 41,300 41,300 Italy Defense-Wide Naples COST TO COMPLETE: SMART GRID 0 7,610 Japan Defense-Wide Fleet Activities Yokosuka KINNICK HIGH SCHOOL (INC) 70,000 70,000 Defense-Wide Kadena Air Base PDI SOF MAINTENANCE HANGAR 88,900 88,900 Defense-Wide Kadena Air Base PDI: SOF COMPOSITE MAINTENANCE FACILITY 11,400 11,400 Kansas Defense-Wide Forbes Field MICROGRID AND BACKUP POWER 0 5,850 Defense-Wide Fort Riley COST TO COMPLETE: POWER GENERATION AND MICROGRID 0 15,468 Korea Defense-Wide K–16 Air Base K–16 EMERGENCY BACKUP POWER 0 5,650 Kuwait Defense-Wide Camp Arifjan COST TO COMPLETE: POWER GENERATION AND MICROGRID 0 8,197 Defense-Wide Camp Buehring MICROGRID AND BACKUP POWER 0 18,850 Louisiana Defense-Wide Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base New Orleans COST TO COMPLETE: DISTRIBUTION SWITCHGEAR 0 6,453 Maryland Defense-Wide Bethesda Naval Hospital MEDICAL CENTER ADDITION/ALTERATION (INC 7) 101,816 101,816 Defense-Wide Fort Meade NSAW MISSION OPS AND RECORDS CENTER (INC) 105,000 105,000 Defense-Wide Fort Meade NSAW RECAP BUILDING 4 (INC) 315,000 315,000 Defense-Wide Fort Meade NSAW RECAP BUILDING 5 (ECB 5) (INC) 65,000 65,000 Defense-Wide Joint Base Andrews HYDRANT FUELING SYSTEM 38,300 38,300 Missouri Defense-Wide Lake City Army Ammunition Plant MICROGRID AND BACKUP POWER 0 80,100 Montana Defense-Wide Great Falls International Airport FUEL FACILITIES 30,000 30,000 Nebraska Defense-Wide Offutt Air Force Base DEFENSE POW/MIA ACCOUNTABILITY AGENCY LABORATORY (P&D) 0 5,000 Defense-Wide Offutt Air Force Base MICROGRID AND BACKUP POWER 0 41,000 North Carolina Defense-Wide Fort Liberty (Camp Mackall) MICROGRID AND BACKUP POWER 0 10,500 Defense-Wide Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune MARINE RAIDER BATTALION OPERATIONS FACILITY 0 70,000 Oklahoma Defense-Wide Fort Sill MICROGRID AND BACKUP POWER 0 76,650 Pennsylvania Defense-Wide Fort Indiantown Gap COST TO COMPLETE: GEOTHERMAL AND SOLAR PV 0 9,250 Puerto Rico Defense-Wide Fort Buchanan MICROGRID AND BACKUP POWER 0 56,000 Defense-Wide Juana Díaz COST TO COMPLETE: MICROGRID CONTROLS, 690 KW PV, 275KW GEN, 570 KWH BESS 0 7,680 Defense-Wide Ramey COST TO COMPLETE: MICROGRID CONTROL SYSTEM, 460 KW PV, 275KW GEN, 660 KWH BESS 0 6,360 Spain Defense-Wide Naval Station Rota BULK TANK FARM, PHASE 1 80,000 80,000 Texas Defense-Wide Fort Cavazos COST TO COMPLETE: POWER GENERATION AND MICROGRID 0 18,900 Defense-Wide Fort Cavazos MICROGRID AND BACKUP POWER 0 18,250 Utah Defense-Wide Hill Air Force Base OPEN STORAGE 14,200 14,200 Virginia Defense-Wide Fort Belvoir DIA HEADQUARTERS ANNEX 185,000 25,000 Defense-Wide Hampton Roads COST TO COMPLETE: BACKUP POWER GENERATION 0 1,200 Defense-Wide Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek—Fort Story SOF SDVT2 OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITY 61,000 61,000 Defense-Wide Fort Belvoir (NGA Campus East) COST TO COMPLETE: CHILLED WATER REDUNDANCY 0 550 Defense-Wide Pentagon HVAC EFFICIENCY UPGRADES 0 2,250 Defense-Wide Pentagon SEC OPS AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FACS 30,600 30,600 Washington Defense-Wide Joint Base Lewis-McChord POWER GENERATION AND MICROGRID 0 49,850 Defense-Wide Joint Base Lewis-McChord SOF CONSOLIDATED RIGGING FACILITY 62,000 62,000 Defense-Wide Manchester BULK STORAGE TANKS, PHASE 2 71,000 71,000 Defense-Wide Naval Undersea Warfare Center Keyport SOF COLD WATER TRAINING AUSTERE ENVIRONMENT FACILITY 0 37,000 Worldwide Unspecified Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide INDOPACOM UNSPECIFIED MINOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 0 62,000 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations ENERGY RESILIENCE AND CONSERV. INVEST. PROG. 548,000 0 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations ERCIP PLANNING & DESIGN 86,250 86,250 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations EXERCISE RELATED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 11,107 11,107 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 49,610 49,610 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 32,579 32,579 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 30,215 30,215 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 25,130 25,130 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 24,000 24,000 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 8,568 8,568 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 3,068 3,068 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 2,000 2,000 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 1,035 1,035 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 590 590 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 19,271 19,271 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 3,000 3,000 Defense-Wide Various Worldwide Locations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 4,875 4,875 Wyoming Defense-Wide F.E. Warren Air Force Base MICROGRID AND BATTERY STORAGE 0 25,000 Subtotal Military Construction, Defense-Wide 2,984,682 3,006,107 ARMY NATIONAL GUARD Alabama Army National Guard Fort McClellan COST TO COMPLETE: ENLISTED BARRACKS, TT 0 7,000 Army National Guard Huntsville COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 0 4,650 Arizona Army National Guard Surprise Readiness Center NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 15,000 15,000 Arkansas Army National Guard Fort Chaffee COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 0 610 California Army National Guard Bakersfield COST TO COMPLETE: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP 0 1,000 Army National Guard Camp Roberts COST TO COMPLETE: AUTOMATED MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN (MPMG) RANGE 0 5,000 Colorado Army National Guard Peterson Space Force Base COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 0 3,000 Connecticut Army National Guard Putnam COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 0 6,125 Florida Army National Guard Camp Blanding MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE 0 11,000 Guam Army National Guard Barrigada COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 0 6,900 Idaho Army National Guard Jerome COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 0 1,250 Army National Guard Jerome County Regional Site NATIONAL GUARD VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP 17,000 17,000 Illinois Army National Guard Bloomington COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP 0 5,250 Army National Guard North Riverside Armory NATIONAL GUARD VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP 24,000 24,000 Indiana Army National Guard Shelbyville COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT 0 5,000 Kansas Army National Guard Topeka COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD/RESERVE CENTER BUILDING 0 5,856 Kentucky Army National Guard Burlington VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP 0 16,400 Army National Guard Frankfort COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD/RESERVE CENTER BUILDING 0 2,000 Louisiana Army National Guard Camp Beauregard COLLECTIVE TRAINING UNACCOMPANIED HOUSING OPEN-BAY (P&D) 0 2,400 Army National Guard Camp Beauregard COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 0 2,000 Army National Guard Camp Minden COST TO COMPLETE: COLLECTIVE TRAINING UNACCOMPANIED HOUSING, OPEN BAY 0 3,718 Maine Army National Guard Northern Maine Range Complex AUTOMATED MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE (P&D) 0 2,800 Army National Guard Saco COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP 0 7,420 Massachusetts Army National Guard Camp Edwards COST TO COMPLETE: AUTOMATED MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN (MPMG) RANGE 0 3,000 Mississippi Army National Guard Camp Shelby CAMP SHELBY JFTC RAILHEAD EXPANSION (P&D) 0 2,200 Army National Guard Camp Shelby COST TO COMPLETE: MANEUVER AREA TRAINING EQUIPMENT SITE ADDITION 0 5,425 Army National Guard Southaven NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 0 22,000 Missouri Army National Guard Belle Fontaine NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 28,000 28,000 Nebraska Army National Guard Bellevue COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 0 9,090 Army National Guard Greenlief Training Site COLLECTIVE TRAINING UNACCOMPANIED HOUSING OPEN-BAY (P&D) 0 1,200 Army National Guard Mead Training Site COST TO COMPLETE: COLLECTIVE TRAINING UNACCOMPANIED HOUSING, OPEN BAY 0 1,913 Army National Guard North Platte COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP 0 400 New Hampshire Army National Guard Concord COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 0 200 Army National Guard Littleton NATIONAL GUARD VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP ADD 23,000 23,000 New Jersey Army National Guard Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 0 605 New Mexico Army National Guard Rio Rancho Training Site NATIONAL GUARD VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP ADD 11,000 11,000 New York Army National Guard Lexington Avenue Armory NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 0 70,000 North Carolina Army National Guard Salisbury ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITIES (P&D) 0 2,200 North Dakota Army National Guard Camp Grafton INSTITUTIONAL POST-INITIAL MILITARY TRAINING, UNACCOMPANIED HOUSING (P&D) 0 1,950 Army National Guard Dickinson COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 0 5,425 Ohio Army National Guard Camp Perry Joint Training Center NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 19,200 19,200 Army National Guard Columbus COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 0 4,000 Oklahoma Army National Guard Ardmore COST TO COMPLETE: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP 0 400 Oregon Army National Guard Washington County Readiness Center NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 26,000 26,000 Pennsylvania Army National Guard Hermitage Readiness Center NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 13,600 13,600 Army National Guard Moon Township COST TO COMPLETE: COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP 0 3,100 Puerto Rico Army National Guard Fort Allen COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 0 3,676 Rhode Island Army National Guard Camp Fogarty Training Site COLLECTIVE TRAINING UNACCOMPANIED HOUSING OPEN-BAY (P&D) 0 1,990 Army National Guard North Kingstown NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 0 30,000 South Carolina Army National Guard Aiken County Readiness Center NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 20,000 20,000 Army National Guard Joint Base Charleston COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 0 4,373 Army National Guard McCrady Training Center AUTOMATED MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE 7,900 7,900 South Dakota Army National Guard Sioux Falls COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 0 5,250 Tennessee Army National Guard Campbell Army Air Field ARMY AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWERS (P&D) 0 2,500 Army National Guard McMinnville COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 0 500 Texas Army National Guard Fort Cavazos GENERAL INSTRUCTION BUILDING (P&D) 0 2,685 Army National Guard Fort Worth COST TO COMPLETE: AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR ADD/ALT 0 6,489 Army National Guard Fort Worth COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP 0 381 Utah Army National Guard Camp Williams COLLECTIVE TRAINING UNACCOMPANIED HOUSING, SENIOR NCO AND OFFICER (P&D) 0 2,875 Vermont Army National Guard Bennington COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 0 3,415 Virgin Islands Army National Guard St. Croix COST TO COMPLETE: ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY 0 4,200 Army National Guard St. Croix COST TO COMPLETE: READY BUILDING 0 1,710 Virginia Army National Guard Sandston Rc & FMS 1 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 20,000 20,000 Army National Guard Troutville COST TO COMPLETE: COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP ADDITION 0 2,415 Army National Guard Troutville COST TO COMPLETE: NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER ADDITION 0 2,135 West Virginia Army National Guard Parkersburg NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER (P&D) 0 3,300 Wisconsin Army National Guard Viroqua NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 18,200 18,200 Worldwide Unspecified Army National Guard Unspecified Worldwide Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 34,286 34,286 Army National Guard Unspecified Worldwide Locations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 63,000 63,000 Subtotal Military Construction, Army National Guard 340,186 650,567 ARMY RESERVE Alabama Army Reserve Birmingham ARMY RESERVE CENTER/AMSA/LAND 57,000 57,000 Arizona Army Reserve San Tan Valley AREA MAINTENANCE SUPPORT ACTIVITY 12,000 12,000 California Army Reserve Camp Pendleton COST TO COMPLETE: AREA MAINTENANCE SUPPORT ACTIVITY 0 3,000 Army Reserve Fort Hunter Liggett NETWORK ENTERPRISE CENTER 0 40,000 Florida Army Reserve Perrine COST TO COMPLETE: ARMY RESERVE CENTER 0 3,000 North Carolina Army Reserve Asheville COST TO COMPLETE: ARMY RESERVE CENTER 0 12,000 Ohio Army Reserve Wright-Patterson Air Force Base COST TO COMPLETE: ARMY RESERVE CENTER 0 5,000 Worldwide Unspecified Army Reserve Unspecified Worldwide Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 23,389 23,389 Army Reserve Unspecified Worldwide Locations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 14,687 14,687 Subtotal Military Construction, Army Reserve 107,076 170,076 NAVY RESERVE & MARINE CORPS RESERVE Michigan Navy Reserve & Marine Corps Reserve Battle Creek ORGANIC SUPPLY FACILITIES 24,549 24,549 Virginia Navy Reserve & Marine Corps Reserve Marine Forces Reserve Dam Neck Virginia Beach G/ATOR SUPPORT FACILITIES 12,400 12,400 Worldwide Unspecified Navy Reserve & Marine Corps Reserve Unspecified Worldwide Locations MCNR PLANNING & DESIGN 6,495 6,495 Navy Reserve & Marine Corps Reserve Unspecified Worldwide Locations MCNR UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 7,847 7,847 Subtotal Military Construction, Navy Reserve & Marine Corps Reserve 51,291 51,291 AIR NATIONAL GUARD Alabama Air National Guard Montgomery Regional Airport F–35 ADAL SQ OPS BLDG 1303 7,000 7,000 Alaska Air National Guard Eielson Air Force Base AMC STANDARD DUAL BAY HANGAR (P&D) 0 3,700 Air National Guard Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson ADAL ALERT CREW FACILITY HGR 18 0 7,000 Arizona Air National Guard Tucson International Airport MCCA: AIRCRAFT ARRESTING SYSTEM (NEW RWY) 11,600 11,600 Arkansas Air National Guard Ebbing Air National Guard Base 3–BAY HANGAR 0 54,000 Air National Guard Ebbing Air National Guard Base AIRCREW FLIGHT EQUIPMENT/STEP 0 9,300 Air National Guard Ebbing Air National Guard Base SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM FACILITY 0 12,700 Colorado Air National Guard Buckley Space Force Base AIRCRAFT CORROSION CONTROL 12,000 12,000 Indiana Air National Guard Fort Wayne International Airport FIRE STATION 8,900 8,900 Mississippi Air National Guard Field Air National Guard Base COST TO COMPLETE: 172ND AIRLIFT WING FIRE/CRASH RESCUE STATION 0 8,000 Missouri Air National Guard Rosecrans Air National Guard Base 139TH AIRLIFT WING ENTRY CONTROL POINT (P&D) 0 2,000 Air National Guard Rosecrans Air National Guard Base ENTRY CONTROL POINT (P&D) 0 2,000 Oregon Air National Guard Portland International Airport SPECIAL TACTICS COMPLEX, PHASE 1 22,000 22,000 Air National Guard Portland International Airport SPECIAL TACTICS COMPLEX, PHASE 2 18,500 18,500 Air National Guard Portland International Airport SPECIAL TACTICS COMPLEX, PHASE 3 0 20,000 Air National Guard Portland International Airport SPECIAL TACTICS COMPLEX, PHASE 4 0 11,000 Pennsylvania Air National Guard Harrisburg International Airport ENTRY CONTROL FACILITY 0 8,000 Wisconsin Air National Guard Truax Field F–35: MM&I FAC, B701 0 5,200 Air National Guard Volk Air National Guard Base FIRE/CRASH RESCUE STATION (P&D) 0 670 Worldwide Unspecified Air National Guard Unspecified Worldwide Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 35,600 35,600 Air National Guard Unspecified Worldwide Locations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 63,122 63,122 Subtotal Military Construction, Air National Guard 178,722 322,292 AIR FORCE RESERVE Arizona Air Force Reserve Davis-Monthan Air Force Base GUARDIAN ANGEL POTFF FACILITY 0 8,500 California Air Force Reserve March Air Reserve Base KC–46 ADD/ALTER B1244 FUT/CARGO PALLET STORAGE 17,000 17,000 Air Force Reserve March Air Reserve Base KC–46 ADD/ALTER B6000 SIMULATOR FACILITY 8,500 8,500 Air Force Reserve March Air Reserve Base KC–46 TWO BAY MAINTENANCE/FUEL HANGAR 201,000 201,000 Guam Air Force Reserve Joint Region Marianas AERIAL PORT FACILITY 27,000 27,000 Louisiana Air Force Reserve Barksdale Air Force Base 307 BW MEDICAL FACILITY ADDITION 0 7,000 Ohio Air Force Reserve Youngstown Air Reserve Station BASE FIRE STATION (P&D) 0 2,500 Texas Air Force Reserve Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth LRS WAREHOUSE 16,000 16,000 Worldwide Unspecified Air Force Reserve Unspecified Worldwide Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 12,146 12,146 Air Force Reserve Unspecified Worldwide Locations UNSPECIFIED MINOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 9,926 9,926 Subtotal Military Construction, Air Force Reserve 291,572 309,572 NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM Worldwide Unspecified NATO NATO Security Investment Program NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM 293,434 293,434 Subtotal NATO Security Investment Program 293,434 293,434 INDOPACIFIC COMBATANT COMMAND Worldwide Unspecified MILCON, INDOPACOM Unspecified Worldwide Locations INDOPACOM MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PILOT PROGRAM 0 150,000 Subtotal Base Realignment and Closure—Defense-Wide 0 150,000 TOTAL INDOPACIFIC COMBATANT COMMAND 0 150,000 TOTAL MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 14,345,019 14,345,019 FAMILY HOUSING FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION, ARMY Georgia Fam Hsg Con, Army Fort Eisenhower FORT EISENHOWER MHPI EQUITY INVESTMENT 50,000 50,000 Germany Fam Hsg Con, Army Baumholder FAMILY HOUSING NEW CONSTRUCTION 78,746 78,746 Kwajalein Fam Hsg Con, Army Kwajalein Atoll FAMILY HOUSING REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION 98,600 98,600 Missouri Fam Hsg Con, Army Fort Leonard Wood FORT LEONARD WOOD MHPI EQUITY INVESTMENT 50,000 50,000 Worldwide Unspecified Fam Hsg Con, Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations FAMILY HOUSING P&D 27,549 27,549 Subtotal Family Housing Construction, Army 304,895 304,895 FAMILY HOUSING O&M, ARMY Worldwide Unspecified Fam Hsg O&M, Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations FURNISHINGS 12,121 12,121 Fam Hsg O&M, Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations HOUSING PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT 86,019 86,019 Fam Hsg O&M, Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations LEASING 112,976 112,976 Fam Hsg O&M, Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations MAINTENANCE 86,706 86,706 Fam Hsg O&M, Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations MANAGEMENT 41,121 41,121 Fam Hsg O&M, Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations MISCELLANEOUS 554 554 Fam Hsg O&M, Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations SERVICES 7,037 7,037 Fam Hsg O&M, Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations UTILITIES 38,951 38,951 Subtotal Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Army 385,485 385,485 FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION, NAVY & MARINE CORPS Guam Fam Hsg Con, Navy & Marine Corps Joint Region Marianas REPLACE ANDERSEN HOUSING, PHASE 8 121,906 121,906 Fam Hsg Con, Navy & Marine Corps Naval Support Activity Andersen REPLACE ANDERSEN HOUSING (AF), PHASE 7 83,126 83,126 Worldwide Unspecified Fam Hsg Con, Navy & Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations DESIGN, WASHINGTON DC 4,782 4,782 Fam Hsg Con, Navy & Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations IMPROVEMENTS, WASHINGTON DC 57,740 57,740 Fam Hsg Con, Navy & Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations USMC DPRI/GUAM PLANNING & DESIGN 9,588 9,588 Subtotal Family Housing Construction, Navy & Marine Corps 277,142 277,142 FAMILY HOUSING O&M, NAVY & MARINE CORPS Worldwide Unspecified Fam Hsg O&M, Navy & Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations FURNISHINGS 17,744 17,744 Fam Hsg O&M, Navy & Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations HOUSING PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT 65,655 65,655 Fam Hsg O&M, Navy & Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations LEASING 60,214 60,214 Fam Hsg O&M, Navy & Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations MAINTENANCE 101,356 101,356 Fam Hsg O&M, Navy & Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations MANAGEMENT 61,896 61,896 Fam Hsg O&M, Navy & Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations MISCELLANEOUS 419 419 Fam Hsg O&M, Navy & Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations SERVICES 13,250 13,250 Fam Hsg O&M, Navy & Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations UTILITIES 43,320 43,320 Subtotal Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Navy & Marine Corps 363,854 363,854 FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION, AIR FORCE Alabama Fam Hsg Con, Air Force Maxwell Air Force Base MHPI RESTRUCTURE-AETC GROUP II 65,000 65,000 Colorado Fam Hsg Con, Air Force U.S. Air Force Academy CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT—CARLTON HOUSE 9,282 9,282 Hawaii Fam Hsg Con, Air Force Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam MHPI RESTRUCTURE-JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM 75,000 75,000 Mississippi Fam Hsg Con, Air Force Keesler Air Force Base MHPI RESTRUCTURE-SOUTHERN GROUP 80,000 80,000 Worldwide Unspecified Fam Hsg Con, Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations PLANNING & DESIGN 7,815 7,815 Subtotal Family Housing Construction, Air Force 237,097 237,097 FAMILY HOUSING O&M, AIR FORCE Worldwide Unspecified Fam Hsg O&M, Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations FURNISHINGS 12,884 23,884 Fam Hsg O&M, Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations HOUSING PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT 31,803 31,803 Fam Hsg O&M, Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations LEASING 5,143 5,143 Fam Hsg O&M, Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations MAINTENANCE 135,410 124,410 Fam Hsg O&M, Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations MANAGEMENT 68,023 68,023 Fam Hsg O&M, Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations MISCELLANEOUS 2,377 2,377 Fam Hsg O&M, Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations SERVICES 10,692 10,692 Fam Hsg O&M, Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations UTILITIES 48,054 48,054 Subtotal Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Air Force 314,386 314,386 FAMILY HOUSING O&M, DEFENSE-WIDE Worldwide Unspecified Fam Hsg O&M, Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations FURNISHINGS 673 673 Fam Hsg O&M, Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations FURNISHINGS 89 89 Fam Hsg O&M, Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations LEASING 32,042 32,042 Fam Hsg O&M, Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations LEASING 13,658 13,658 Fam Hsg O&M, Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations MAINTENANCE 35 35 Fam Hsg O&M, Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations UTILITIES 4,273 4,273 Fam Hsg O&M, Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations UTILITIES 15 15 Subtotal Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Defense-Wide 50,785 50,785 FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND Worldwide Unspecified Family Housing Improvement Fund Unspecified Worldwide Locations ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES—FHIF 6,611 6,611 Subtotal Family Housing Improvement Fund 6,611 6,611 UNACCOMPANIED HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND Worldwide Unspecified Unaccompanied Housing Improvement Fund Unspecified Worldwide Locations ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES—UHIF 496 496 Subtotal Unaccompanied Housing Improvement Fund 496 496 TOTAL FAMILY HOUSING 1,940,751 1,940,751 DEFENSE BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE, ARMY Worldwide Unspecified BRAC, Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE 150,640 150,640 Subtotal Base Realignment and Closure—Army 150,640 150,640 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE, NAVY Worldwide Unspecified BRAC, Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE 108,818 108,818 Subtotal Base Realignment and Closure—Navy 108,818 108,818 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE, AIR FORCE Worldwide Unspecified BRAC, Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE 123,990 123,990 Subtotal Base Realignment and Closure—Air Force 123,990 123,990 BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE, DEFENSE-WIDE Worldwide Unspecified BRAC, Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations INT–4: DLA ACTIVITIES 5,726 5,726 Subtotal Base Realignment and Closure—Defense-Wide 5,726 5,726 TOTAL DEFENSE BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE 389,174 389,174 TOTAL MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, FAMILY HOUSING, AND BRAC 16,674,944 16,674,944 XLVII DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS Program FY 2024 Senate Discretionary Summary by Appropriation Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Nuclear Energy 177,733 177,733 Atomic Energy Defense Activities National Nuclear Security Administration: Weapons Activities 18,832,947 19,108,947 Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 2,508,959 2,483,959 Naval Reactors 1,964,100 1,964,100 Federal Salaries and Expenses 538,994 538,994 Total, National Nuclear Security Administration 23,845,000 24,096,000 Defense Environmental Cleanup 7,073,587 7,073,587 Defense Uranium Enrichment D&D 427,000 0 Other Defense Activities 1,075,197 1,075,197 Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities 32,420,784 32,244,784 Total, Discretionary Funding 32,598,517 32,422,517 Nuclear Energy Safeguards and security 177,733 177,733 Total, Nuclear Energy 177,733 177,733 National Nuclear Security Administration Weapons Activities Stockpile management Stockpile major modernization B61 Life extension program 449,850 449,850 W88 Alteration program 178,823 178,823 W80–4 Life extension program 1,009,929 1,009,929 W80–4 ALT Nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missile 0 75,000 Program increase (75,000) W87–1 Modification Program 1,068,909 1,068,909 W93 389,656 389,656 Subtotal, Stockpile major modernization 3,097,167 3,172,167 Stockpile sustainment 1,276,578 1,276,578 Weapons dismantlement and disposition 53,718 53,718 Production operations 710,822 710,822 Nuclear enterprise assurance 66,614 66,614 Total, Stockpile management 5,204,899 5,279,899 Production Modernization Primary Capability Modernization Plutonium Modernization Los Alamos Plutonium Modernization Los Alamos Plutonium Operations 833,100 833,100 21–D–512 Plutonium Pit Production Project, LANL 670,000 670,000 15–D–302 TA–55 Reinvestments Project, Phase 3, LANL 30,000 30,000 07–D–220-04 Transuranic Liquid Waste Facility, LANL 0 0 04–D–125 Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement Project, LANL 227,122 227,122 Subtotal, Los Alamos Plutonium Modernization 1,760,222 1,760,222 Savannah River Plutonium Modernization Savannah River Plutonium Operations 62,764 62,764 21–D–511 Savannah River Plutonium Processing Facility, SRS 858,235 858,235 Subtotal, Savannah River Plutonium Modernization 920,999 920,999 Enterprise Plutonium Support 87,779 87,779 Total, Plutonium Modernization 2,769,000 2,769,000 High Explosives & Energetics High Explosives & Energetics 93,558 93,558 23–D–516 Energetic Materials Characterization Facility, LANL 0 19,000 Restore project (19,000) 21–D–510 HE Synthesis, Formulation, and Production, PX 0 110,000 Restore project (110,000) 15–D–301 HE Science & Engineering Facility, PX 101,356 101,356 Subtotal, High Explosives & Energetics 194,914 323,914 Total, Primary Capability Modernization 2,963,914 3,092,914 Secondary Capability Modernization Secondary Capability Modernization 666,914 666,914 18–D–690 Lithium Processing Facility, Y–12 210,770 210,770 06–D–141 Uranium Processing Facility, Y–12 760,000 760,000 Total, Secondary Capability Modernization 1,637,684 1,637,684 Tritium and Domestic Uranium Enrichment Tritium and Domestic Uranium Enrichment 592,992 592,992 18–D–650 Tritium Finishing Facility, SRS 0 0 Total, Tritium and Domestic Uranium Enrichment 592,992 592,992 Non-Nuclear Capability Modernization Non-Nuclear Capability Modernization 166,990 166,990 22–D–513 Power Sources Capability, SNL 37,886 37,886 Total, Non-Nuclear Capability Modernization 204,876 204,876 Capability Based Investments 156,462 156,462 Total, Production Modernization 5,555,928 5,684,928 Stockpile research, technology, and engineering Assessment Science Assessment Science 917,751 926,751 Program increase for Krypton Fluoride laser (9,000) 14–D–640 U1a Complex Enhancements Project, NNSS 126,570 126,570 Total, Assessment Science 1,044,321 1,053,321 Engineering and integrated assessments 440,456 440,456 Inertial confinement fusion 601,650 641,650 Program increase (40,000) Advanced simulation and computing 782,472 792,472 Program increase (10,000) Weapon technology and manufacturing maturation 327,745 327,745 Academic programs 152,271 152,271 Total, Stockpile research, technology, and engineering 3,348,915 3,407,915 Infrastructure and operations Operating Operations of facilities 1,053,000 1,053,000 Safety and Environmental Operations 139,114 139,114 Maintenance and Repair of Facilities 718,000 718,000 Recapitalization Infrastructure and Safety 650,012 650,012 Subtotal, Recapitalization 650,012 650,012 Total, Operating 2,560,126 2,560,126 Mission enabling construction 22–D–510 Analytic Gas Laboratory, PX 35,000 35,000 22–D–511 Plutonium Production Building, LANL 48,500 48,500 22–D–512 TA–46 Protective Force Facility, LANL 48,500 48,500 22–D–517 Electrical Power Capacity Upgrade, LANL 75,000 75,000 22–D–518 Plutonium Modernization Ops & Waste Mngmt Office Bldg, LANL 0 0 23–D–519 Special Material Facility, Y–12 0 0 Total, Mission enabling construction 207,000 207,000 Total, Infrastructure and operations 2,767,126 2,767,126 Secure transportation asset Operations and equipment 239,008 239,008 Program direction 118,056 118,056 Total, Secure transportation asset 357,064 357,064 Defense nuclear security Operations and maintenance 988,756 991,756 Program increase (3,000) Construction: 17–D–710 West End Protected Area Reduction Project, Y–12 28,000 38,000 Program increase (10,000) Subtotal, Construction 28,000 38,000 Total, Defense nuclear security 1,016,756 1,029,756 Information technology and cybersecurity 578,379 578,379 Legacy contractor pensions 65,452 65,452 Total, Weapons Activities 18,894,519 19,170,519 Adjustments Use of prior year balances –61,572 –61,572 Total, Adjustments –61,572 –61,572 Total, Weapons Activities 18,832,947 19,108,947 Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Material Management and Minimization Conversion (formerly HEU Reactor Conversion) 116,675 116,675 Nuclear material removal 47,100 47,100 Material disposition 282,250 282,250 Total, Material Management and Minimization 446,025 446,025 Global Material Security International nuclear security 84,707 84,707 Radiological security 258,033 258,033 Nuclear smuggling detection and deterrence 181,308 181,308 Total, Global Material Security 524,048 524,048 Nonproliferation and Arms Control 212,358 212,358 Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D Proliferation detection 290,388 290,388 Nonproliferation stewardship program 107,437 107,437 Nuclear detonation detection 285,603 285,603 Forensics R&D 44,759 44,759 Nonproliferation fuels development 0 0 Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D 728,187 728,187 Nonproliferation Construction: 18–D–150 Surplus Plutonium Disposition Project, SRS 77,211 77,211 Total, Nonproliferation Construction 77,211 77,211 NNSA Bioassurance Program 25,000 0 Program reduction (–25,000) Legacy contractor pensions 22,587 22,587 Nuclear Counterterrorism and Incident Response Program Emergency Operations 19,123 19,123 Counterterrorism and Counterproliferation 474,420 474,420 Total, Nuclear Counterterrorism and Incident Response Program 493,543 493,543 Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 2,528,959 2,503,959 Adjustments Use of prior year balances –20,000 –20,000 Total, Adjustments –20,000 –20,000 Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 2,508,959 2,483,959 Naval Reactors Naval reactors development 838,340 838,340 Columbia-Class reactor systems development 52,900 52,900 S8G Prototype refueling 0 0 Naval reactors operations and infrastructure 712,036 712,036 Program direction 61,540 61,540 Construction: 22–D–533 BL Component Test Complex 0 0 22–D–531 KL Chemistry & Radiological Health Building 10,400 10,400 21–D–530 KL Steam and Condensate Upgrade 53,000 53,000 14–D–901 Spent Fuel Handling Recapitalization Project, NRF 199,300 199,300 24–D–530 NRF Medical Science Complex 36,584 36,584 Total, Construction 299,284 262,700 Total, Naval Reactors 1,964,100 1,964,100 Federal Salaries and Expenses Program direction 538,994 538,994 Use of prior year balances 0 0 Total, Federal Salaries and Expenses 538,994 538,994 TOTAL, National Nuclear Security Administration 23,845,000 24,096,000 Defense Environmental Cleanup Closure sites administration 3,023 3,023 Richland River corridor and other cleanup operations 180,000 180,000 Central plateau remediation 684,289 684,289 Richland community and regulatory support 10,100 10,100 18–D–404 Modification of Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility 0 0 22–D–401 L–888 Eastern Plateau Fire Station 7,000 7,000 22–D–402 L–897 200 Area Water Treatment Facility 11,200 11,200 23–D–404 181D Export Water System Reconfiguration and Upgrade 27,149 27,149 23–D–405 181B Export Water System Reconfiguration and Upgrade 462 462 24–D–401 Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility Supercell 11 Expans Proj 1,000 1,000 Total, Richland 921,200 921,200 Office of River Protection: Waste Treatment Immobilization Plant Commissioning 466,000 466,000 Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition 813,625 813,625 Construction: 23–D–403 Hanford 200 West Area Tank Farms Risk Management Project 15,309 15,309 15–D–409 Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System 60,000 60,000 18–D–16 Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant—LBL/Direct feed LAW 0 0 01–D–16D High-Level Waste Facility 600,000 600,000 01–D–16E Pretreatment Facility 20,000 20,000 Subtotal, Construction 695,309 695,309 ORP Low-level waste offsite disposal 0 0 Total, Office of River Protection 1,974,934 1,974,934 Idaho National Laboratory: Idaho cleanup and waste disposition 377,623 377,623 Idaho community and regulatory support 2,759 2,759 Construction: 22–D–403 Idaho Spent Nuclear Fuel Staging Facility 10,159 10,159 22–D–404 Addl ICDF Landfill Disposal Cell and Evaporation Ponds Project 46,500 46,500 22–D–402 Calcine Construction 10,000 10,000 Subtotal, Construction 66,659 66,659 Total, Idaho National Laboratory 447,041 447,041 NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 1,879 1,879 LLNL Excess Facilities D&D 20,195 20,195 Separations Processing Research Unit 15,300 15,300 Nevada Test Site 61,952 61,952 Sandia National Laboratory 2,264 2,264 Los Alamos National Laboratory 273,831 273,831 Los Alamos Excess Facilities D&D 13,648 13,648 Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites 389,069 389,069 Oak Ridge Reservation: OR Nuclear Facility D&D 335,000 335,000 U233 Disposition Program 55,000 55,000 OR cleanup and waste disposition 72,000 72,000 Construction: 14–D–403 Outfall 200 Mercury Treatment Facility 10,000 10,000 17–D–401 On-site Waste Disposal Facility 24,500 24,500 Subtotal, Construction 34,500 34,500 OR community & regulatory support 5,500 5,500 OR technology development and deployment 3,000 3,000 Total, Oak Ridge Reservation 505,000 505,000 Savannah River Site: Savannah River risk management operations 453,109 453,109 Savannah River legacy pensions 65,898 65,898 Savannah River community and regulatory support 12,389 12,389 Savannah River National Laboratory O&M 42,000 42,000 Construction: 20-D–401 Saltstone Disposal Unit #10, 11, 12 56,250 56,250 19–D–701 SR Security Systems Replacement 0 0 18–D–401 Saltstone Disposal Unit #8, 9 31,250 31,250 18–D–402 Emergency Operations Center Replacement, SR 34,733 34,733 Subtotal, Construction 122,233 122,233 Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization 880,323 880,323 Total, Savannah River Site 1,575,952 1,575,952 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Waste Isolation Pilot Plant 369,961 369,961 Construction: 15–D–411 Safety Significant Confinement Ventilation System, WIPP 44,365 44,365 15–D–412 Utility Shaft, WIPP 50,000 50,000 Total, Construction 94,365 94,365 Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant 464,326 464,326 Program direction—Defense Environmental Cleanup 326,893 326,893 Program support—Defense Environmental Cleanup 103,504 103,504 Safeguards and Security—Defense Environmental Cleanup 332,645 332,645 Technology development and deployment 30,000 30,000 Subtotal, Defense Environmental Cleanup 7,073,587 7,073,587 TOTAL, Defense Environmental Cleanup 7,073,587 7,073,587 Defense Uranium Enrichment D&D 427,000 0 Program reduction (–427,000) Other Defense Activities Environment, health, safety and security Environment, health, safety and security mission support 144,705 144,705 Program direction 86,558 86,558 Total, Environment, health, safety and security 231,263 231,263 Office of Enterprise Assessments Enterprise assessments 30,022 30,022 Program direction 64,132 64,132 Total, Office of Enterprise Assessments 94,154 94,154 Specialized security activities 345,330 345,330 Legacy Management Legacy Management Activities—Defense 173,681 173,681 Program Direction 22,621 22,621 Total, Legacy Management 196,302 196,302 Defense-Related Administrative Support 203,649 203,649 Office of Hearings and Appeals 4,499 4,499 Subtotal, Other Defense Activities 1,075,197 1,075,197 Use of prior year balances 0 0 Total, Other Defense Activities 1,075,197 1,075,197 July 11, 2023 Read twice and placed on the calendar

Summary: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 This bill authorizes FY2024 appropriations and sets forth policies for Department of Defense (DOD) programs and activities, military construction, the national security programs of the Department of Energy (DOE), and the Maritime Administration, as well as the Department of State and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). It also authorizes appropriations for the Defense Nuclear Safety Board and the Naval Petroleum Reserves, and sets policy for several other agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The bill authorizes appropriations, but it does not provide budget authority, which is provided by appropriations legislation. For additional information on the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) see CRS In Focus IF10516, Defense Primer: Navigating the NDAA, CRS In Focus IF10515, Defense Primer: The NDAA Process, and CRS Insight IN12210, FY2024 NDAA: Status of Legislative Activity. TITLE I--PROCUREMENT This title authorizes appropriations for the acquisition or modification of various military items (such as aircraft, ships, tracked combat vehicles, missiles, and ammunition) and sets policy for certain procurement programs. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 113 requires the Army to submit a strategy for FY2025 and every five years afterwards for its tactical wheeled vehicle program. Sec. 123 authorizes the Navy to enter into multiyear procurement contracts for 10 Virginia class attack submarines. Sec. 131 prohibits the Air Force from retiring RQ-4 Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicles until after the end of FY2028 and limits the Air Force from reducing the fleet below 10 aircraft. Sec. 132 limits the Air Force from retiring T-1A training aircraft until the Air Force certifies the implementation of the Undergraduate Pilot Training 2.5 curriculum. Sec. 133 reduces the minimum number of A-10 aircraft that the Air Force must maintain. Sec. 134 reduces the total minimum number of fighter aircraft that the Air Force must maintain. Sec. 137 prohibits the Air Force from retiring E-3 Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) aircraft to a fleet size below 16 until the Air Force (1) submits a plan to Congress for maintaining mission readiness with a reduced fleet, or (2) procures sufficient numbers of E-7 Wedgetail aircraft to accomplish the required mission load. Sec. 142 requires DOD to develop and implement a department-wide datalink strategy. For additional information see CRS In Focus IF10599, Defense Primer: Procurement, CRS Report RL32418, Navy Virginia-Class Submarine Program and AUKUS Submarine Proposal: Background and Issues for Congress, CRS Report R47188, Unmanned Aircraft Systems: Roles, Missions, and Future Concepts, and CRS Report R41909, Multiyear Procurement (MYP) and Block Buy Contracting in Defense Acquisition: Background and Issues for Congress. TITLE II--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION This title authorizes appropriations for research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) and sets policy for certain RDT&E activities, such as microelectronics and artificial intelligence. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 211 requires DOD to ensure that military acquisition program guidance for major defense acquisition programs and middle-tier acquisition programs integrates planning for exportability features. Exportability refers to technology protection features in defense systems developed early in acquisition life cycles to facilitate earlier foreign sales. Sec. 212 authorizes DOD to provide funds to sustain U.S. participation in the NATO Defence Innovation Accelerator for the North Atlantic (DIANA) Initiative. Sec. 214 removes the Navy as the resource sponsor of the Advanced Sensors Application Program and establishes the Air Force as resource sponsor, in consultation with the Navy. Sec. 216 requires DOD to establish a program within the National Security Agency to determine standards and requirements in procuring commercial-off-the-shelf microelectronics, field programmable gate arrays, and custom integrated circuits. Sec. 218 requires DOD to establish a competition to award cash prizes and other types of prizes to evaluate technologies for the detection and watermarking of generative artificial intelligence (AI). Sec. 221 requires DOD to award cash prizes and other types of prizes to support DOD business modernization goals. When carrying out the competition to award such prizes, DOD must consider various areas, such as (1) integration of artificial intelligence or machine learning capabilities; (2) data analytics or business intelligence, or related visualization capability (3) automated updating of business architecture, business systems integration, or documentation related to existing systems or manuals; (4) updates or replacements for legacy systems; and (5) systems supporting industrial base and supply chain visibility. Sec. 229 authorizes Air Force Global Strike Command to establish a program for technology transition for the Air Force nuclear enterprise. The U.S. Air Force nuclear enterprise consists of people, processes, procedures, and systems to conduct, execute, and support nuclear weapon systems and operations. For additional information see CRS In Focus IF10553, Defense Primer: RDT&E, CRS Report R45403, The Global Research and Development Landscape and Implications for the Department of Defense, CRS In Focus IF11333, Deep Fakes and National Security, and CRS Report R45178, Artificial Intelligence and National Security. TITLE III--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE This title authorizes appropriations for operation and maintenance (O&M) and sets policy for certain O&M programs, such as sustainable aviation fuel and the treatment of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 312 expands the number of federal agencies that may take part in the Sentinel Landscapes Partnership, a program in which government agencies work with private entities and landowners to advance sustainable land management practices around military installations and ranges. Sec. 313 modifies and adds definitions for various terms associated with DOD's pilot program on sustainable aviation fuel. Sec. 315 requires DOD to provide technical assistance to communities and individuals potentially affected by pollutant releases at current and former DOD facilities. The section also authorizes grants for technical assistance in those communities. Sec. 321 authorizes DOD to treat materials contaminated with PFAS if the treatment occurs through remediation or disposal technology approved by the relevant Federal regulatory agency, until the Environmental Protection Agency publishes a final rule on destruction and disposal of such materials. Sec. 324 limits the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment from using a portion of its travel funds until the office submits to Congress a plan to restore data sharing pertaining to the testing of water for PFAS. Sec. 328 requires the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to report on DOD's efforts to test and remediate PFAS contamination on current or former military installations. Sec. 331 requires DOD to establish a pilot program to evaluate and assess military installations for cyber resiliency. The pilot program shall also address other issues, such as (1) how to prioritize the restoration of power, water, and telecommunications in case of an attack; and (2) recommend priorities for the order of recovery for the installation in the case of a significant cyberattack. Sec. 332 requires the Navy to develop and implement a strategy to utilize automation and artificial intelligence in shipyards. Sec. 352 prohibits U.S. Special Operations Command from retiring U-28 aircraft until it certifies to Congress that its intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capacity and capability, in a DOD estimate of its programs in its future-years defense program (FYDP), is equal to or greater than that provided by the current fleet of U-28 aircraft. Sec. 357 limits the Navy in spending more than 50% of its Administration and Service-wide Activities account for FY2024 until it submits to Congress a 30-year shipbuilding plan that maintains at least 31 amphibious warships. For additional information see CRS Report R47171, Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF): In Brief, CRS In Focus IF10537, Defense Primer: Cyberspace Operations, and CRS Report RL32665, Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Information for Congress. TITLE IV--MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS This title authorizes appropriations for military personnel and sets active component and reserve component end-strength levels. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 401 authorizes the maximum number of active duty personnel as of September 30, 2024, for each of the armed forces as follows: o Army - 452,000, o Navy - 342,000, o Marine Corps - 172,300, o Air Force - 320,000, and o Space Force - 9,400. Sec. 411 authorizes the maximum number of Selected Reserve personnel as of September 30, 2024, for each of the reserve components: o Army National Guard - 325,000, o Army Reserve - 174,800, o Navy Reserve - 57,200, o Marine Corps Reserve - 33,600, o Air National Guard of the United States - 105,000, o Air Force Reserve - 69,600, and o Coast Guard Reserve - 7,000. TITLE V--MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY This title sets policy regarding military personnel, including officer personnel policy, promotions, assignments, junior reserve officers' training corps, and recruiting. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 506 makes permanent the authority of military departments to order military retirees to active duty if they agree to serve in certain high-demand or critical positions. Sec. 513 allows DOD to vary the duration of appointments for seven senior military officers (the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and each of the Service Chiefs) by up to six months in the interests of national defense or to ensure appropriate staggering of terms. Sec. 525 specifies that the Vice Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall hold the grade of General. (This position currently carries the grade of Lieutenant General, as set by executive branch determination.) Sec. 535 prohibits DOD from requiring any member of the armed forces, military dependent, or DOD civilian employee to affirm that any sex, race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin is inherently superior or inferior. This section also requires that all DOD personnel actions (such as accessions, promotions, and assignments) be based exclusively on individual merit and demonstrated performance. Sec. 537 prohibits the military departments from employing military or civilian personnel with a rank or grade above GS-10 to a position whose sole duties include certain diversity, equity, and inclusion duties. If any personnel in such a position are currently above the GS-10 level, they must be reassigned to another position within 180 days of this bill's passage. Sec. 551 requires a military service to establish a future servicemember preparatory course if more than 10% of that service's active duty non-prior service enlistees in a fiscal year score in the 10th to 30th percentiles on the Armed Forces Qualification Test. (A future servicemember preparatory course focuses on improving the physical fitness and aptitude scores of participants to facilitate meeting enlistment requirements.) Sec. 571 requires DOD to establish and support between 3,400 and 4,000 Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps (JROTC) units except in specified circumstances. (There were 3,499 JROTC units in FY2023.) This section also eliminates the requirement that there be a fair and equitable distribution of JROTC units throughout the nation. For additional information see CRS Insight IN12205, FY2024 NDAA: Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps (JROTC) Matters. TITLE VI--COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS This title sets policy regarding various aspects of military compensation, including allowances, bonus and incentive pays, and other compensation matters. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 604 authorizes certain members of the reserve components who are ordered to active duty for training to receive two housing allowances, one for their duty location and one for the location of their primary residence, even when the member is authorized transportation of household goods to their duty location. This authority applies to reservists who (1) have no dependents, (2) are ordered to active duty for training purposes for a period of 140 to 364 days, and (3) either own or are responsible for rental payments on their primary residence. Sec. 605 allows DOD to, in cases of demonstrated need, exclude a servicemember's Basic Allowance for Housing from the calculation of gross household income used to determine eligibility for the Basic Needs Allowance. (The Basic Needs Allowance is provided to servicemembers with dependents and typically having a gross household income less than or equal to 150% of the federal poverty guidelines. Currently, amounts received as a Basic Allowance for Housing are typically included when calculating a servicemember's gross household income.) Sec. 607 lowers the minimum threshold for high cost area used to determine locations eligible for Continental United States Cost-of Living Allowance (CONUS COLA) from 8% above the average cost of living in the continental United States to 5%. Sec. 623 extends by one year (through December 31, 2024) a variety of compensation authorities for the uniformed services, including bonuses for enlisted and officer personnel, hazardous duty pay, special duty pay, and skill incentive pay. For additional information see CRS In Focus IF12196, FY2024 NDAA: Basic Needs Allowance and Military Food Insecurity. TITLE VII--HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS This title sets policy regarding military health care, including TRICARE (the medical and dental care program for members and former members of the uniformed services and their dependents). Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 701 extends from six months to three years the period of eligibility for surviving family members to receive TRICARE Reserve Select health care coverage after the death of an enrolled servicemember. Sec. 704 requires DOD to provide intensive outpatient programs to treat members of the Armed Forces suffering posttraumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, and co-occurring disorders related to military sexual trauma. Sec. 705 allows DOD to waive cost-sharing requirements for the first three outpatient mental health visits per year for active duty family members enrolled in the TRICARE Select and TRICARE Prime health care programs, and certain other dependents in the TRICARE Select program. For additional information see CRS In Focus IF10530, Defense Primer: Military Health System, CRS Insight 12215, FY2024 NDAA: TRICARE for Reservists, and CRS Insight IN12242, FY2024 NDAA: Military Mental Health Care and Research Provisions. TITLE VIII--ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED MATTERS This title sets policy regarding acquisitions and acquisition management, including contracting authorities and small businesses. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 815 requires DOD to update certain policies related to Earned Value Management (EVM), a program management tool used to assess cost, schedule, and technical progress on programs. Specifically, the policies must (1) exempt all software contracts and subcontracts from EVM requirements, (2) increase contract value threshold associated with requiring EVM from $20 million to $50 million on cost or incentive contracts, and (3) increase the contract value threshold for the contractor to use the EVM System from $50 million to $100 million. Sec. 819 requires DOD to amend its acquisition regulations to require entities that provide management, scientific, and technical consulting services to certify that either (1) the entity and its subsidiaries do not have contracts with covered foreign entities or (2) the entity has a conflict of interest mitigation surveillance plan. The covered foreign entities include the governments (including state-owned entities) of China, Russia, or any country that has repeatedly provided support for international terrorism. Sec. 820 prohibits DOD from requiring defense contractors to provide any information about greenhouse gas (e.g., carbon dioxide, methane, or hydrofluorocarbons) emissions. This prohibition shall be (1) permanent with respect to nontraditional defense contractors (generally an entity that has not worked on a DOD contract that is subject to full cost accounting standards coverage), and (2) for the two-year period starting from this bill's enactment date for all other types of contractors. Sec. 844 requires DOD prime contractors to notify the contracting officer if the prime contractor pays a reduced price or is more than 30 days past due on payments to certain small business subcontractors. This section also requires DOD prime contractors to cooperate with the contracting officer to correct or mitigate any unjustified failure to make full or timely payments to such subcontractors. For additional information see CRS Insight IN12225, FY2024 NDAA: Department of Defense Acquisition Policy, and CRS Insight IN12221, FY2024 NDAA: Defense Industrial Base Policy. TITLE IX--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT This title sets policy regarding the Office of the Secretary of Defense and DOD organization and management. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 901 establishes an Office of Strategic Capital within the Office of the Secretary of Defense, with duties that include (1) developing and integrating capital strategies of DOD partners, (2) identifying and prioritizing promising critical technologies and assets in need of capital assistance such as certain loans or equity investments, and (3) funding investments in such technologies and assets. Sec. 902 reinstates the position of Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, to be appointed by the President from civilian life with the advice and consent of the Senate (this position was eliminated by Sec. 901 of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021). Responsibilities of the Chief Management Officer include (1) managing the enterprise business operations and shared services of DOD, (2) serving as principal advisor on enterprise business operations, and (3) exercising authority over those defense agencies and field agencies providing shared business services for DOD. Sec. 903 changes the duties of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE), eliminating a requirement to assess the effect of DOD spending on the U.S. economy and adding a requirement to lead the standardization of analytical methodologies and establish a centralized knowledge repository of data for modeling and simulation. This section also requires DOD to establish an analytical team, reporting only to the Secretary of Defense, which shall critically assess methodologies, assumptions and data used in certain analyses conducted by the CAPE Director. For additional information see CRS Insight IN12254, FY2024 NDAA: Department of Defense Office of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE). TITLE X--GENERAL PROVISIONS This title sets policy in various areas, including counterdrug activity, naval vessels, and servicemember rights to readmission at institutions of higher education. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 1013 increases the maximum cost of small-scale construction projects (from $750,000 to $1,500,000) that DOD may fund to support the activities of foreign law enforcement agencies to counter transnational organized crime and drug-related activities. Sec. 1022 requires the Navy to maintain at least 24 amphibious warfare ships operationally available for worldwide deployment. (Amphibious warfare ships include general purpose amphibious assault ships, multi-purpose amphibious assault ships, amphibious transport docks, or dock landing ships.) Sec. 1023 bars funds authorized to be appropriated under this bill to be obligated or expended to retire, prepare for retirement, or place in storage the following naval vessels: USS Germantown (LSD 42), USS Gunston Hall (LSD 44), USS Tortuga (LSD 46) or USS Shiloh (CG 67). Sec. 1082 bars funds authorized to be appropriated under this bill or otherwise made available from being obligated or expended for the destruction of antipersonnel mines (except in the case of unsafe mines) until DOD submits a report to Congress on DOD policy regarding the use of antipersonnel mines and projected inventory levels of such mines over the next 10 years. Sec. 1090K eliminates a requirement that servicemembers must serve on active duty for more than 30 days to be covered under a law that mandates institutions of higher education readmit members of the armed forces who are absent due to active duty service. TITLE XI--CONNECTING OCEANIA'S NATIONS WITH VANGUARD EXERCISES AND NATIONAL EMPOWERMENT Connecting Oceania's Nations with Vanguard Exercises and National Empowerment or the CONVENE Act of 2023 This title authorizes the Department of State to engage with Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, and Palau to advise and provide assistance to each country's national security council or similar coordinating body. The assistance is intended to help these counties better coordinate with the U.S. government and armed forces and to increase cohesion on activities such as emergency response and maritime security. TITLE XII--CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS This title sets policy for various matters related to DOD civilian employees. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 1206 expands a direct hiring authority for certain DOD laboratories, increasing the number of direct appointments to scientific and engineering positions from 6% to 11% of the total positions. Sec. 1207 expands a DOD direct hiring authority to apply to DOD positions for which there is a critical hiring need or shortage of candidates in support of (1) aircraft operations; (2) the safety of the public, law enforcement, or first response; or (3) the DOD Office of the Inspector General relating to oversight of the conflict in Ukraine. Sec. 1210 expands the Department of the Air Force's authority to hire civilians as instructors at the Air University to include hiring for the Space Delta 13, (the U.S. Space Force organization for developing and educating its leaders. (The Department of the Air Force includes both the Air Force and the Space Force.) TITLE XIII--MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS This title sets policy for various matters related to DOD interactions with foreign nations, including security cooperation initiatives. It includes subtitles related to (1) security assistance and training; (2) Syria, Iraq, and Iran; (3) Europe and Russia; and (4) the Indo-Pacific region. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Subtitle A--Assistance and Training Sec. 1301 requires DOD to seek to develop a regional Middle East integrated maritime domain awareness capability that includes Israel to protect the people, infrastructure, and territory of countries in the region against Iran and nonstate actors, such as violent extremist organizations and criminal networks. DOD must report to Congress a strategy and feasibility study for achieving an integrated regional maritime domain awareness capability. Sec. 1302 authorizes DOD to provide friendly foreign militaries with persistent advanced networked training and exercise activities, subject to restrictions in current law. Sec. 1303 increases the amount allowed for small-scale construction projects in DOD security cooperation programs, projects specifically intended to build the capacity of partner nations' national security forces to conduct a variety of operations. The section also expands DOD security cooperation programs by authorizing such programs to build the capacity of foreign forces in (1) counterillicit trafficking operations, and (2) foreign internal defense operations. Sec. 1304 extends the authority for DOD to continue an initiative of legal institutional capacity building with the defense ministries of foreign countries through 2028. Sec. 1306 extends the authority for DOD to continue to provide logistical support for stabilization activities in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, and Somalia through 2025. Sec. 1307 extends the authority for DOD to continue to enter into cross-servicing agreements to loan military coalition partners personnel protection and personnel survivability equipment through 2029. Sec. 1308 limits the authority of DOD to spend more than 75% of Operations and Maintenance funds for FY2024 until DOD submits a security cooperation strategy for each combatant command as required by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022. Sec. 1309 establishes additional requirements for the DOD Security Cooperation Workforce Development Program. Specifically, the section requires the program to provide comprehensive personnel tracking and accounting for all DOD employees engaged in the security cooperation enterprise. Through the program, DOD must also ensure that all DOD security cooperation personnel assigned to U.S. embassies are trained to a level of proficiency equal to those trained to be defense attaches. This section also establishes a Foreign Military Sales Center of Excellence and a Defense Security Cooperation University. Sec. 1310 authorizes DOD to support, on a reimbursement basis, border security operations conducted by Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan on their borders with Afghanistan. Sec. 1312 requires the Air Force to train Israeli Air Force personnel to operate the KC-46 aerial refueling aircraft and to establish a military personnel exchange program with Israel for training on the KC-46 aircraft. The section also requires DOD to rotationally deploy KC-46 aircraft to Israel if the government of Israel consents to the deployment. Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Syria, Iraq, and Iran Sec. 1321 extends the authority for DOD to continue to provide training and equipment to vetted Syrian groups and individuals through 2024. Sec. 1322 extends the authority for DOD to continue to operate an office of security cooperation in Iraq through FY2024 and reduces the amount of authorized funds. Sec. 1323 extends the authority for DOD to provide assistance to Iraqi and local security forces fighting the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria through 2024. The section also authorizes assistance to counter threats from unmanned aerial systems. Sec. 1325 renews a requirement for an executive branch official to coordinate the U.S. government response to issues related to Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) members in the custody of Syrian Democratic Forces. The section also modifies aspects of this coordinator position, such as by expanding the scope to include issues concerning relevant displaced individuals who are not ISIS members. Specifically, the section renews the requirement to have this coordinator position through January 31, 2025. Under current law, this requirement expired on January 31, 2021. Subtitle C--Matters Relating to Europe and the Russian Federation Sec. 1331 extends through 2027 the authority for DOD to continue the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, which (among other authorizations) provides security assistance to Ukraine. Sec. 1332 extends through 2026 the authority for DOD to continue to provide assistance for training certain eastern European national security forces in multilateral exercises, and adds Kosovo as an eligible country. Sec. 1334 extends the authority for DOD to continue to enter into multiyear procurement contracts to replace certain weapons and munitions transferred to Ukraine through FY2025 and authorizes multiyear procurement for additional types of munitions. Sec. 1335 requires DOD to prioritize U.S. military basing, training, and exercises among NATO allies to those countries spending at least 2% of gross domestic product on defense unless waived due to U.S. national security interests. Subtitle D--Matters Relating to the Indo-Pacific Region Sec. 1341 establishes an Indo-Pacific campaigning initiative, seeking to ensure the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command conducts logically linked military activities to achieve strategy-aligned objectives. The initiative's goals shall include (1) strengthening U.S. military alliances and partnerships in the region, (2) deterring military aggression by potential adversaries, and (3) shaping the perception of potential adversaries with respect to U.S. military capabilities. Sec. 1342 requires DOD to establish a comprehensive training, advising, and institutional capacity-building program for Taiwan's military forces. Sec. 1343 requires DOD to seek to establish an initiative with allies and partners to bolster maritime domain awareness in the Indo-Pacific region. Sec. 1344 extends the authority for DOD to continue the Pacific Deterrence Initiative (a program to enhance the United States deterrence and defense posture in the Indo-Pacific region) through the end of FY2024. Sec. 1346 extends the authority for DOD to continue a program to improve cyber cooperation with foreign military partners in southeast Asia through 2029. The section also adds the Philippines and Malaysia to the program. Sec. 1347 authorizes DOD to enter into multiyear procurement contracts to replace certain munitions transferred to Taiwan and to authorize DOD to enter into agreements with Taiwan and other foreign allies to provide materiel and related services in support of Taiwan. This authority matches current law regarding Ukraine. The section also extends the authority for DOD to enter into these contracts and agreements through fiscal year 2028. Sec. 1351 requires DOD to seek to ensure that India is appropriately considered for security cooperation benefits as a major defense partner of the United States. Sec. 1352 requires DOD to seek to engage with Taiwan to expand military cybersecurity activities. Sec. 1353 requires DOD to designate a senior civilian official to oversee the U.S.-Australia-United Kingdom security partnership (AUKUS). Sec. 1361 prohibits funds authorized by this bill to be used to support any film, television, or other entertainment project if is likely to comply with a demand from China to censor the project's content. Sec. 1362 prohibits funds authorized by this bill to be made available to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for any purpose. Subtitle E--Securing Maritime Data From China Securing Maritime Data from China Act of 2023 Sec. 1373 prohibits DOD from entering into or renewing contracts with entities that use LOGLINK or any logistics platform associated with the Chinese government. Subtitle G--Other Matters Sec. 1392 requires DOD to establish a partnership program with other countries to develop and maintain military-wide transformational strategies for operational energy. Sec. 1393 authorizes DOD to expend funds to support foreign forces, irregular forces, or individuals engaged in supporting or facilitating irregular warfare operations by U.S. special operations forces. Sec. 1394 assigns to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict (SO/LIC) primary oversight responsibility of DOD's clandestine activities in likely or potential operational areas to set conditions for mission execution. The section also requires DOD to establish procedures to ensure coordination, legal review, and adherence to policy for clandestine activities. Sec. 1397 increases the amount authorized for RDT&E for cooperative programs with Israel on military directed energy capabilities, with a corresponding offset decrease in the amount authorized for the Air Force's VC-2B presidential aircraft program. Sec. 1399A extends the prohibition for DOD to provide in-flight refueling to non-U.S. aircraft that engage in hostilities in the ongoing civil war in Yemen, for one year beginning on the date of enactment. Sec. 1399B extends the authority for DOD to jointly carry out research, development, test, and evaluation to establish anti-tunnel capabilities with Israel through 2026. Sec. 1399C prohibits the Secretary of Defense from delegating the authority to designate foreign partner forces as eligible for collective self-defense support by U.S. Armed Forces. Sec. 1399E requires DOD to seek to cooperate with allies and partners in the Middle East to develop an integrated regional cybersecurity architecture and deepen military cybersecurity partnerships. Sec. 1399F authorizes DOD to establish a foreign advance acquisition account to accelerate the production of U.S.-produced defense items in anticipation of transfer through the Foreign Military Sales or Direct Commercial Sales processes. Sec. 1399G limits DOD in expending travel funds for the Office of the Secretary of Defense until it submits to Congress (1) plans for establishing a joint force headquarters in the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command area of responsibility, (2) a plan relating to strategic competition in the U.S. Southern Command and the U.S. Africa Command areas of responsibility, and (3) a strategy and posture review relating to operations in the information environment. Sec. 1399J requires DOD to increase resources allocated to its security cooperation workforce to streamline and expedite the Foreign Military Sales process. The section authorizes DOD to establish the Foreign Military Sales Continuous Process Improvement Board. Sec. 1399K requires DOD to respond to Foreign Military Sales requests for pricing and availability from foreign purchasers no later than 45 days from receipt. Ending China's Developing Nation Status Act Sec. 1399L requires the Department of State to (1) pursue changing China's status from developing nation to developed nation in international organizations if a mechanism exists to make such a change, or (2) propose a new mechanism to make such a change. (Generally, international organizations provide developing nations certain rights and beneficial treatment. For example, the World Trade Organization provides developing nations with so-called special and differential treatment, which includes measures that aim to increase trading opportunities for those nations.) International Port Security Enforcement Act Sec. 1399N prohibits the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Coast Guard, in conducing foreign port security assessments in current law, to enter into agreements with a foreign government that is a state sponsor or terrorism or a foreign terrorist organization. DHS must also deem any port under the jurisdiction of a state sponsor of terrorism as not having effective antiterrorism measures and apply sanctions in current law to the port. Subtitle H--Limitation on Withdrawal From NATO Subtitle H prohibits the President from withdrawing from NATO by suspending, terminating, denouncing, or withdrawing the United States from the North Atlantic Treaty except (1) by and with the advice and consent of the Senate with two-thirds of the Senators present concurring, or (2) pursuant to an act of Congress. The subtitle also limits the use of any authorized funds from this bill to support any decision by a U.S. government official to attempt to withdraw the United States from NATO. Subtitle I--Combating Global Corruption Combating Global Corruption Act Subtitle I requires the State Department to evaluate and annually publish a list of countries that fail to meet certain standards to combat corruption. The subtitle also requires State Department to designate an anticorruption point of contact at each U.S. diplomatic post in each country identified as having failed to meet such standards. Subtitle J--International Children With Disabilities Protection International Children with Disabilities Protection Act of 2023 Subtitle J authorizes the State Department to establish a program for protecting children with disabilities internationally. For additional information see CRS Insight IN12256, FY2024 NDAA: Security Cooperation, CRS Report R41409, Multiyear Procurement (MYP) and Block Buy Contracting in Defense Acquisition: Background and Issues for Congress, CRS In Focus IF11426, Department of Defense Counter-Unmanned Aircraft Systems, CRS In Focus IF12040, U.S. Security Assistance to Ukraine, CRS In Focus IF11080, Syria Conflict Overview: 2011-2021, CRS In Focus IF12438, India-U.S.: Major Arms Transfers and Military Exercises, CRS Report RS21048, U.S. Special Operations Forces (SOF): Background and Considerations for Congress, CRS Report R46066, NATO: Key Issues for the 117th Congress, CRS In Focus IF12481, Taiwan: Defense and Military Issues, CRS In Focus IF10537, Defense Primer: Cyberspace Operations, CRS In Focus IF11437, Transfer of Defense Articles: Foreign Military Sales (FMS), CRS Report R46337, Transfer of Defense Articles: U.S. Sale and Export of U.S.-Made Arms to Foreign Entities, CRS In Focus IF11064, U.S. Efforts to Combat Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing, and Other Illicit Financial Threats: An Overview, and CRS Report R46925, Department of Defense Directed Energy Weapons: Background and Issues for Congress. TITLE XIV--COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION This title allocates amounts authorized for the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program for specified purposes. TITLE XV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS This title authorizes appropriations for specified working capital and revolving funds and for other programs, including chemical agents and munitions destruction, drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, and the defense health program. It also sets policy regarding national defense stockpile requirements. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 1511 requires DOD to establish policies and procedures to recycle rare earth elements and other strategic and critical materials contained in DOD equipment that has reached the end of its useful life. Sec. 1513 authorizes the National Defense Stockpile to dispose of specified materials, including 8 short tons of beryllium, 5,000 kilograms of germanium, and 154,043 short dry tons of metallurgical grade manganese ore. Sec. 1522 authorizes appropriations for the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund. For additional information see CRS Report R46618, An Overview of Rare Earth Elements and Related Issues for Congress. TITLE XVI--SPACE ACTIVITIES, STRATEGIC PROGRAMS, AND INTELLIGENCE MATTERS This title sets policy for various matters related to space activities, nuclear forces, missile defense, and intelligence. Below are examples of provisions in this title. Subtitle A--Space Activities Sec. 1601 requires DOD to establish a third lane for Phase 3 of National Security Space Launch (NSSL) acquisition while authorizing DOD's current two lanes of NSSL acquisition for FY2025 through FY2029. The third lane, for FY2027 through FY2029, requires DOD to establish an acquisition program meeting the requirements for the current Lane 2 to obtain five launches of GPS Block IIIF satellites or satellites where the launches are complex, high-energy missions. Sec. 1602 requires the Department of the Air Force to designate a date for the initial operating capability of the Advanced Tracking and Launch Analysis System (ATLAS), and to terminate the program if it does not achieve initial operating capability by that date. Sec. 1603 designates the Department of the Air Force as responsible for tasking of space-based ground and airborne moving target indication systems. Sec. 1605 requires the Space Development Agency to use the middle tier of acquisition authority (typically used to rapidly develop fieldable prototypes to demonstrate new capabilities or rapidly field production quantities of systems that require minimal development) for the rapid fielding of satellites and associated systems for the first three tranches of the agency's proliferated warfighter space architecture. Sec. 1606 authorizes the military services to provide space launch support services to civil and commercial space entities. Sec. 1609 limits the Department of the Air Force in expending military construction funds on a headquarters for the U.S. Space Command until it submits a report to Congress justifying the selection of a permanent location for that headquarters. This section also limits the Department of the Air Force from expending a portion of its travel funds until the report has been submitted. Subtitle B--Nuclear Forces Sec. 1611 prohibits DOD from reducing the number of deployed intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) to below 400. Sec. 1612 requires DOD to refurbish at least 150 silos at certain locations for use by the LGM-25A Sentinel ICBM program. Sec. 1613 authorizes multiyear procurement contracts and advance procurement for the Sentinel ICBM program and imposes certain requirements related to such procurement. Sec. 1618 requires DOD to establish a nuclear sea-launched cruise missile (SLCM-N) program. This section also requires the National Nuclear Security Administration to initiate the feasibility study and design option phase for the warhead that would be used with the SLCM-N. Sec. 1619 requires the Air Force to develop a replacement for the Strategic Automated Command and Control System (SACCS) by the time the LGM-25A Sentinel ICBM reaches initial operational capability. Sec. 1623 limits DOD in using operation and maintenance funds until it fully complies with information requests from the GAO regarding a study on DOD strategic nuclear weapons capabilities, force structure, employment policy, and targeting requirements. Sec. 1624 requires the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) to notify Congress within 48 hours after assessing that Iran has any amount of uranium-235 enriched to greater than 60% purity or has engaged in significant enrichment activity. For the purposes of this notification requirement, significant enrichment activity is enrichment of uranium-235 (1) to a purity percentage 5% or higher than indicated in any prior notification to Congress, or (2) in a quantity exceeding 10 kilograms. Subtitle C--Missile Defense Sec. 1634 authorizes the Missile Defense Agency to procure components from Israel for the Iron Dome short-range rocket system. The section also authorizes funds and coproduction with Israel for the David's Sling weapon system and the Arrow 3 upper tier interceptor program. Sec. 1637 requires U.S. Indo-Pacific Command to develop a comprehensive strategy to acquire and establish an integrated air and missile defense architecture for the command's area of responsibility. Sec. 1641 statutorily requires DOD to establish an electronic warfare executive committee to inform, coordinate, and evaluate matters of electronic warfare. The section also requires DOD to establish (1) processes and procedures for electronic warfare and joint electromagnetic spectrum operations across DOD, and (2) an Electromagnetic Spectrum Enterprise Operational Lead for Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations at the U.S. Strategic Command. DOD must also report to Congress annually on various issues, including (1) DOD's electronic warfare strategy, (2) an evaluation of whether sufficient funds exist in the President's annual budget submission for electromagnet battle management and joint electromagnetic spectrum operations cells, and (3) an electromagnetic spectrum superiority implementation plan. Sec. 1645 requires DOD to establish requirements for protecting sensor, navigation, and communications systems against jamming, spoofing, and unintended interference from military systems. DOD must also prioritize such protection efforts. DOD must also require the military departments and combat support agencies to take actions to ensure that certain radar, signals intelligence, navigation, and communications systems are able to withstand jamming, spoofing, and unintended interference. Such actions shall include periodically testing each system and retrofitting as necessary. Sec. 1646 limits DOD spending in support of activities involving unidentified anomalous phenomena protected under any form of restricted or special access that have not been formally described, explained, and justified to Congress. Sec. 1647 extends through 2025 the authority of DOD to engage in commercial activities necessary to provide security for authorized intelligence collection activities abroad. The section also requires DOD to pre-coordinate with the Central Intelligence Agency when engaging in such activities. For additional information see CRS In Focus IF11531, Defense Primer: National Security Space Launch, CRS In Focus IF11495, Defense Primer: The United States Space Force, CRS In Focus IF11681, Defense Primer: LGM-35A Sentinel Intercontinental Ballistic Missile, CRS In Focus IF12084, Nuclear-Armed Sea-Launched Cruise Missile (SLCM-N), CRS In Focus IF11118, Defense Primer: Electronic Warfare, CRS Report R41409, Multiyear Procurement (MYP) and Block Buy Contracting in Defense Acquisition: Background and Issues for Congress, and CRS In Focus IF12106, Iran and Nuclear Weapons Production. TITLE XVII--CYBERSPACE-RELATED MATTERS This title sets policy for various matters related to U.S. military cyber activities, DOD's cyber work force, and cyber acquisition. Below are examples of provisions in this title. Subtitle A--Matters Relating to Cyber Operations and Cyber Forces Sec. 1701 requires DOD to develop a plan to standardize enlistment lengths, tour lengths, and training standards for cyber personnel across the military services. The U.S. Cyber Command must commence a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of acquiring the services of skilled personnel in critical work roles of the Cyber Mission Force. Sec. 1702 requires DOD to establish a dedicated cyber intelligence capability to support the requirements of the U.S. Cyber Command and various other parts of DOD relating to intelligence on cyber technology development, capabilities, and plans and intentions of cyber threat actors. DOD may establish an all-source analysis center to provide this capability. Sec. 1704 requires DOD to modernize its cyber red teams with a focus on utilizing cyber threat intelligence and threat modeling. Sec. 1706 authorizes DOD to conduct cyber operations with Mexico to detect and monitor Mexican transnational criminal organizations engaged in illegal activities such as drug smuggling, human trafficking, or weapons trafficking. Sec. 1707 requires DOD to establish a pilot program to collaborate with U.S. semiconductor manufacturers on improving the cybersecurity of the supply chain for semiconductor design and manufacturing. Sec. 1708 requires DOD to seek to enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Public Administration for a study to evaluate the feasibility and desirability of establishing a Cyber Force as a separate military service. Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Department of Defense Cybersecurity and Information Technology Sec 1711 requires DOD to create a process for enabling public network service providers of fifth generation (5G) information and communications capabilities to provide commercial subscriber services to government and contractor personnel on DOD bases and facilities. Sec. 1712 requires DOD to carry out a modernization program for network boundary and cross-domain defense against cyber attacks, expanding on an FY2023 pilot program. Sec. 1715 assigns responsibility for DOD-wide cyber incident reporting and notification to the Department of Defense Information Network. DOD must also ensure that DOD components document instances in which DOD personnel are affected by a privacy data breach and notify those individuals within 72 hours of discovery of the breach. Sec. 1717 requires DOD to establish a cross-functional team to develop and direct the implementation of a threat-driven cyber defense construct for systems and networks supporting the nuclear command, control, and communications mission. Sec. 1719 establishes the Identity, Credential, and Access Management initiative as a DOD program of record. This would require DOD to list this program in the Future Years Defense Program (FYDP) and to abide by certain federal and DOD regulations for acquisition. Sec. 1722 requires DOD to establish a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of implementing industry open technical standards for digital content provenance for publicly-released DOD photographic and video content. This section also requires the Defense Media Activity to establish a course at the Defense Information School to teach practical concepts and skills related to issues related to digital content provenance, including the challenges posed to DOD operations by digital content forgery. Sec. 1723 authorizes certain postgraduation recipients of Cyber Service Academy scholarship grants to meet the obligations of their postaward employment through employment in the Intelligence Community, including in elements that are not part of DOD. To satisfy these obligations, the employment must be with an element of the Intelligence Community that has entered into an agreement with DOD concerning such postaward employment. Sec. 1725 requires DOD to establish a chief digital and artificial intelligence officer governing council to ensure the responsible, coordinated, and ethical employment of data and artificial intelligence capabilities across DOD. Sec. 1726 requires DOD to provide support to selected institutions of higher learning that offer programs to future military and civilian DOD leaders for operational cyber expertise. Such support shall include (1) expanding cyber educational programs focused on enhancing the transition of civilian and military DOD leaders into cyber fields within DOD, (2) hands-on cyber opportunities, and (3) direct financial assistance to civilian and military students at DOD. Sec. 1728 requires the GAO to report on DOD efforts to protect personal information of DOD personnel from exploitation by foreign adversaries. For additional information see CRS In Focus IF10537, Defense Primer: Cyberspace Operations. TITLE XVIII--SPACE FORCE PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Space Force Personnel Management Act This title sets policy with regards to the management of Space Force military personnel. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 1803 requires DOD to seek to enter into an agreement with a federal funded research and development center to conduct an independent study to assess the feasibility and advisability of moving all National Guard units performing core space functions or otherwise integral to the Space Force mission into a single-component Space Force. The study must include an analysis of several options, including creating a National Guard component of the Space Force. Sec. 1811 specifies that all members of the Space Force shall be managed through a single personnel management system without component (i.e., there will not be separate personnel systems for a full-time regular component and a mostly part-time reserve component). Sec. 1812 eliminates the Regular Space Force from a statute describing the composition of the Space Force, thereby eliminating a distinction between active component and reserve component personnel that is found in other military services. Sec. 1814 specifies that each member of the Space Force will be assigned to one of three duty statuses: (1) active status, (2) inactive status, or (3) retired status. This section also addresses how the minimum service requirement for new members of the armed forces will be applied to members of the Space Force. Sec. 1841 sets a transition period, ending on the last day of the fourth fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of the bill, for the U.S. Space Force to transition to the new personnel management system specified in this title (i.e., the single personnel management system without component required by Sec. 1811). Sec. 1845 requires the Department of the Air Force to disestablish the Regular Space Force once all Space Force personnel are transitioned to the Space Force without component (but no later than the end of the transition period specified in Section 1841). DIVISION B--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 TITLE XXI--ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION This title authorizes appropriations for (1) specified Army construction and land acquisition projects, and (2) new construction, improvements, and planning for Army family housing. This title also extends the authorization of certain projects from previous fiscal years. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 2101 authorizes various Army military construction projects. Sec. 2102 authorizes various Army family housing projects. Sec. 2103 authorizes appropriations for the previously specified Army military construction and family housing projects. Sec. 2105 extends a 2018 project authorization for an unmanned aerial vehicle hangar at Kunsan Air Base, South Korea. TITLE XXII--NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION This title authorizes appropriations for (1) specified Navy construction and land acquisition projects, and (2) new construction, improvements, and planning for Navy family housing. This title also extends the authorization of certain projects from previous fiscal years. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 2201 authorizes various Navy military construction projects. Sec. 2202 authorizes various Navy family housing projects. Sec. 2203 authorizes appropriations for the previously specified Navy military construction and family housing projects. Sec. 2205 extends several 2021 project authorizations, including a wastewater treatment plant at Twentynine Palms, CA. TITLE XXIII--AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION This title authorizes appropriations for (1) specified Air Force construction and land acquisition projects, and (2) improvements and planning for Air Force family housing. This title also extends the authorization of certain projects from previous fiscal years. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 2301 authorizes various Air Force military construction projects. Sec. 2302 authorizes various Air Force family housing projects. Sec. 2303 authorizes appropriations for the previously specified Air Force military construction and family housing projects. Sec. 2304 extends several 2017 project authorizations, including a C-130J corrosion control hangar at Yokota Air Base, Japan. TITLE XXIV--DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION This title authorizes appropriations for (1) specified Defense Agency construction and land acquisition projects, and (2) specified energy conservation and utility system projects. This title also extends or modifies the authorization of certain projects from previous fiscal years. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 2401 authorizes various DOD agency military construction projects. Sec. 2402 authorizes various energy resilience and conservation investment program projects. Sec.2403 authorizes appropriations for the previously specified DOD agency military construction and energy resilience and conservation investment program projects. Sec. 2405 extends several 2019 project authorizations, including an elementary school at Camp McTureous, Japan. TITLE XXV--INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS This title authorizes DOD to make specified contributions to NATO for construction and land acquisition projects, and to accept specified military construction projects from South Korea and Poland as in-kind contributions. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 2501 authorizes DOD to make contributions for authorized NATO military construction projects. Sec. 2502 authorizes appropriations for the contributions authorized in section 2501. Sec. 2511 authorizes DOD to accept certain military construction projects in South Korea, with in-kind funding contributions from the South Korean government. Sec. 2512 authorizes DOD to accept certain military construction projects in Poland, with in-kind funding contributions from the Polish government. TITLE XXVI--GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES This title authorizes appropriations for specified construction and land acquisition projects for the Army National Guard, Army Reserve, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, Air National Guard, and Air Force Reserve. This title also extends or modifies the authorization of certain projects from previous fiscal years. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 2601 authorizes various Army National Guard military construction projects. Sec. 2602 authorizes various Army Reserve military construction projects. Sec. 2603 authorizes various Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve military construction projects. Sec. 2604 authorizes various Air National Guard military construction projects. Sec. 2605 authorizes various Air Force Reserve military construction projects. Sec. 2606 authorizes appropriations for the previously specified National Guard and Reserve military construction projects. Sec. 2607 extends a 2018 project authorization at Hulman Regional Airport, IN. TITLE XXVII--BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES This title authorizes appropriations for base realignment and closure activities as authorized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990. TITLE XXVIII--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS This title sets policy in such areas as military construction and military housing. This title also authorizes specified land conveyances. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 2801 authorizes U.S. Indo-Pacific Command to carry out military construction projects not otherwise authorized by law, with a cost of any such project not to exceed $15 million, to (1) support the rotational deployment of the armed forces, (2) enhance facility preparedness and installation resilience in support of national defense activities, or (3) provide for prepositioning and storage of equipment and supplies. Sec. 2813 authorizes the military departments to carry out pilot programs under which existing enlisted barracks in substandard condition may be replaced with new enlisted barracks not otherwise authorized by law. Sec. 2842 requires DOD to implement the recommendations contained in the GAO report entitled DOD Can Further Strengthen Oversight of Its Privatized Housing Program or, if DOD does not implement all of the recommendations, to submit a report to Congress explaining the reasons for not implementing those recommendations. Sec. 2852 requires DOD to include certain questions related to living accommodation satisfaction in its annual status of forces survey. Sec. 2862 authorizes the Department of theArmy to convey a parcel of property known as the Wetzel County Memorial Army Reserve Center to the City of Martinsville, WV, for the purposes of providing emergency management response or law enforcement services. For additional information see CRS Insight IN12229, FY2024 NDAA: Military Construction and Housing Authorities. DIVISION C--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS TITLE XXXI--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS This title authorizes appropriations for the activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), defense environmental cleanup, nuclear energy, and other defense activities. This title also sets policy for certain nuclear related matters and authorizes new plant projects for the NNSA at specified locations. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 3119 limits funds authorized to be appropriated for FY2024 under this bill for operations of the Office of the Administrator for Nuclear Security. Under this section, no more than 50% of such funds may be obligated or expended until the NNSA submits a report to Congress on the spend plan for the warhead associated with the sea-launched cruise missile. Sec. 3143 prohibits the Department of Energy (DOE) from drawing down and selling petroleum products from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (1) to any entity under the control of the Chinese Communist Party, China, Russia, North Korea, or Iran; or (2) except on the condition that such products not be exported to China, Russia, North Korea, or Iran. Sec. 3144 establishes new programs and expands existing programs to increase domestic supplies of certain types of low-enriched uranium. For example, the DOE must establish a program to increase the production of certain types of low-enriched uranium by U.S. nuclear energy companies. TITLE XXXII--DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD This title authorizes appropriations for the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. TITLE XXXV--MARITIME ADMINISTRATION This title makes editorial changes to a statutory provision that defines certain aspects of the Maritime Administration, such as the administration's organization and powers. DIVISION D--FUNDING TABLES TITLE XLI--PROCUREMENT This title sets forth amounts requested and authorized for procurement. TITLE XLII--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION This title sets forth amounts requested and authorized for research, development, test, and evaluation. TITLE XLIII--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE This title sets forth amounts requested and authorized for operation and maintenance. TITLE XLIV--MILITARY PERSONNEL This title sets forth amounts requested and authorized for military personnel. TITLE XLV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS This title sets forth amounts requested and authorized for the National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund, various working capital funds, chemical agents and munitions destruction, drug interdiction and counterdrug activities, the Office of the Inspector General, and the defense health program. TITLE XLVI--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION This title sets forth amounts requested and authorized for military construction. TITLE XLVII--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS This title sets forth amounts requested and authorized for DOE national security programs. For additional information see CRS Insight IN12209, FY2024 NDAA: Summary of Funding Authorizations. DIVISION E--ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS TITLE LI--PROCUREMENT This title contains the additional provisions related to procurement. For example, Sec. 5133 prohibits DOD from expending funds on retiring F-15E aircraft through fiscal year 2029. TITLE LII--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION This title contains the additional provisions related to RDT&E. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 5201 authorizes DOD to establish public-private exchange programs, each with up to 10 participants, focused on private sector entities working on quantum information sciences and technology research applications. Sec. 5203 authorizes DOD to establish a fellowship program in quantum information science and technology research for individuals with a graduate or postgraduate degree. Sec. 5206 authorizes the military departments to, upon receiving DOD approval, use rapid acquisition and funding authorities to leverage emerging technological advancements or to provide a rapid response to an emerging threat. This section also includes various requirements related to such authorities, such as the information a military department must provide to DOD when requesting approval to use such authorities. For additional information see CRS In Focus IF11836, Defense Primer: Quantum Technology, and CRS Insight IN12225, FY2024 NDAA: Department of Defense Acquisition Policy. TITLE LIII--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE This title requires a report to Congress from the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment on incinerators and waste-to-energy waste disposal alternatives to burn pits. TITLE LVI--COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS This title contains the following additional provisions related to military compensation. Sec. 5631 expands a program that provides transitional compensation to dependents of servicemembers separated from active duty for dependent abuse. Specifically, this section authorizes the program to provide compensation in cases where the servicemember was convicted of dependent abuse in a federal district court or state court and was separated from active duty for an offense other than the dependent abuse offense. (The current program is generally limited to cases where the servicemember is separated from active duty or forfeits all pay and allowances as a result of the dependent abuse offense.) Sec. 5632 requires DOD to report to Congress on the effect of a 2019 law that phased out a requirement that certain DOD survivor benefits be reduced if the survivor also received payments under a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) program that provides a tax-free cash benefit to eligible survivors of certain deceased servicemembers. Specifically, the report must assess the effects, including any unintended consequences, of phasing out the requirement that payments under the DOD Survivor Benefit Plan be offset by payments received through the VA's Dependency and Indemnity Compensation program. For additional information see CRS Report R45325, Military Survivor Benefit Plan: Background and Issues for Congress. TITLE LVII--HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS This title contains additional provisions related military health care. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 5701 expands the authority to provide hearing aids at uniformed services medical facilities to include certain dependents of military retirees enrolled in family coverage under the TRICARE Prime health care plan. Sec. 5724 authorizes DOD to expand a demonstration project (intended to evaluate the cost, quality, and impact of doulas and lactation consultants) to add coverage of labor doula care, or reimbursement for such care, for all beneficiaries under the TRICARE health care program. (Currently, the demonstration project is only for TRICARE Prime or TRICARE Select enrollees.) This section also authorizes military medical treatment facilities to hire doulas. TITLE LVIII--ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED MATTERS This title contains the following additional provisions related to acquisitions and acquisition management. Sec. 5841 requires DOD to issue guidance to enhance the ability of small businesses to compete for DOD contracts, including by allowing the temporary waiver of certain requirements to bid on a contract. Sec. 5851 requires DOD to brief Congress on the designation of certain parts as proprietary in the Defense Logistics Agency system over the past five years. For additional information see CRS In Focus IF11543, Defense Primer: The Defense Logistics Agency. TITLE LX--OTHER MATTERS This title addresses a variety of topics, including DOD efforts related to artificial intelligence (AI), child abuse, and visas for foreign nationals employed by the U.S. government abroad. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 6079 requires DHS to transfer to California without reimbursement seven Coast Guard HC-130H aircraft (a fixed wing search-and-rescue aircraft), along with initial spares and necessary ground support equipment, if the governor of California submits a written request for such aircraft. The transferred aircraft must be demilitarized and used only for wildfire suppression purposes. Sec. 6082, the Preventing Child Sex Abuse Act of 2023, makes changes to the federal law prohibiting child sexual tourism. This section (1) revises the specific intent required for certain offenses involving interstate or foreign travel to engage in or facilitate illicit sexual conduct; (2) establishes new criminal offenses for acts in furtherance of illicit sexual conduct by an officer, director, employee, or agent of an organization through his or her connection to or affiliation with the organization; and (3) specifies that the term sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense does not require interpersonal physical contact. Sec. 6097 authorizes DOD to implement a bug bounty program for foundational AI models (an adaptive generative model that is trained on a broad set of unlabeled data sets that can be used for different tasks, with minimal fine-tuning) being integrated into DOD missions and operations. (Current DOD bug bounty programs pay certain individuals to identify and resolve security vulnerabilities in websites and other systems.) Sec. 6098 requires DOD to conduct a study analyzing certain vulnerabilities to AI-enabled military applications. Subtitle H--Granting Recognition to Accomplished Talented Employees for Unwavering Loyalty Act Granting Recognition to Accomplished Talented Employees For Unwavering Loyalty Act or the GRATEFUL Act Sec. 6093 makes additional visas available under a program that provides special immigrant visas to eligible foreign nationals who were employed by the U.S. government abroad. Generally, under this program, a foreign national (and their spouse and children) may receive a special immigrant visa if (1) the foreign national has been employed by the U.S. government abroad for at least 15 years, and (2) the Department of State has found that it is in the national interest to award the visa. There are a limited number of such visas available each fiscal year. This section makes additional special immigrant visas available if no visas are immediately available. Up to 3,500 additional visas shall be made available for FY2024, and up to 3,000 shall be made available in each subsequent fiscal year. TITLE LXII--MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS This title contains additional provisions related to DOD interactions with foreign nations. Subtitle C--Matters Relating to Europe and the Russian Federation Sec. 6231, the Black Sea Security Act of 2023, requires the National Security Council to prepare a strategy for Black Sea security and development to (1) increase coordination with NATO and the European Union, (2) deepen economic ties, (3) strengthen energy security, (4) support efforts to bolster regional democratic resilience, and (5) enhance security assistance with regional partners. Subtitle D--Matters Relating to the Indo-Pacific Region Sec. 6242 requires the President to stake steps to treat Taiwan as if it were included in the countries eligible for a strategic trade authorization exception for the purposes of export controls. Before Taiwan receives such treatment, the President must ensure that Taiwan meets certain criteria, particularly with respect with aligning Taiwan's export control policies with those of the United States. Subtitle G--Other Matters Sec. 6292 requires the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to assess and report on the top five technologies that originate in the United States and are not currently subject to export controls, in order to identify the risk from those technologies that could be used for espionage by foreign adversaries. Sec. 6293 requires the President to certify to Congress, prior to transferring any Virginia-class submarines to Australia, that the submarines would be used for joint security interests and that Australia is ready to support their operations and nuclear power procedures. For additional information see CRS Report R46458, Emerging Military Technologies: Background and Issues for Congress, and CRS Report RL32418, Navy Virginia-Class Submarine Program and AUKUS Submarine Proposal: Background and Issues for Congress. TITLE LXV--SPACE ACTIVITIES, STRATEGIC PROGRAMS, AND INTELLIGENCE MATTERS This title contains the following additional provision related to nuclear forces. Sec. 6511 requires the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) to report to Congress annually on the joint development of the long-range stand-off weapon, including the Air Force-developed missile and the NNSA W80-4 warhead life extension program. For additional information see CRS In Focus IF10519, Defense Primer: Strategic Nuclear Forces. TITLE LXVIII--FEND OFF FENTANYL ACT Fentanyl Eradication and Narcotics Deterrence Off Fentanyl Act or the FEND Off Fentanyl Act. This title contains provisions related to trafficking of fentanyl and other illicit opioids. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 6813 requires that the sanctions specified in Executive Order 14059 (relating to sanctions on foreign persons involved in the global illicit drug trade), as well as any amendments to or directives issued pursuant to that executive order before the date of the enactment of this bill, shall remain in effect. Sec. 6814 requires the President to impose property-blocking sanctions on any foreign person knowingly involved in (1) significant trafficking of fentanyl, fentanyl precursors, or other related opioids, including such trafficking by a transnational criminal organization; or (2) significant activities of a transnational criminal organization relating to the trafficking of fentanyl, fentanyl precursors, or other related opioids. Sec. 6831 authorizes the Department of the Treasury to take certain actions relating to certain financial institutions, classes of transactions, or types of accounts that (1) involve a non-U.S. jurisdiction, and (2) are primary money laundering concerns in connection with illicit opioid trafficking. Specifically, for such institutions, transaction classes, or account types, Treasury may require domestic financial institutions to (1) take certain special measures, (2) prohibit certain transmittals of funds, or (3) impose conditions on transmittals of funds. Sec. 6832 requires Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network to issue guidance to U.S. financial institutions for filing reports of suspicious transactions related to suspect fentanyl trafficking by transnational criminal organizations. For additional information see CRS In Focus 122260, The Opioid Crisis in the United States: A Brief History, and CRS In Focus 10890, China Primer: Illicit Fentanyl and China's Role. TITLE LXXVIII--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS This title contains the following additional provisions related to military construction. Sec. 7851 requires the Army to submit a report to Congress on the Army's plan to replace houses at Fort Leonard Wood that are in need of repair. Sec. 7881 requires DOD to conduct a study, using an outside organization, on the correlation between certain construction projects that affect servicemember quality of life and (1) active duty retention, (2) the physical health of servicemembers, and (3) the mental health of servicemembers. Sec. 7882 limits to Major Range and Test Facility Bases a pilot program that requires the establishment of accounts for select Air Force installations for the purpose of receiving reimbursements for the use of those installation's testing facilities. (Such bases are part of the core set of DOD test and evaluation infrastructure and associated workforce that must be preserved as a national asset to provide test and evaluation capabilities to support the DOD acquisition system.) This section also gives the commander at installations in the pilot program greater oversight of the expenditure of the reimbursement amounts, and prohibits the reduction of certain appropriated funding on the basis of pilot program participation or usage of reimbursements. TITLE LXXXI--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS Accelerating Deployment of Versatile, Advanced Nuclear for Clean Energy Act of 2023 or the ADVANCE Act of 2023. This title sets forth provisions to develop and deploy advanced nuclear fuel for the United States and certain allied countries, restrict the possession or ownership of enriched uranium from Russia or China, clean up hazardous land, and establish related requirements. For example, this title provides incentives for developing and deploying new nuclear technologies, such as reduced licensing fees and prize awards for deploying such technologies. It also extends through 2045 the indemnification policy under the Price-Anderson Act that limits liability related to the nuclear industry. DIVISION F--DEPARTMENT OF STATE AUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2023 Department of State Authorization Act of 2023 This division authorizes FY2024 appropriations and sets forth policies for Department of State programs and activities. Below are examples of provisions in this division. For additional information see CRS In Focus IF10293, Foreign Relations Reauthorization: Background and Issues. TITLE LXI--DIPLOMATIC SECURITY AND CONSULAR AFFAIRS Sec. 6101 authorizes the State Department to directly appoint up to 80 candidates under a special hiring authority to positions in the competitive (civil) service for passport and visa examining during a three-year period following this bill's enactment. Sec. 6103 requires the State Department to place certain travel advisory information on the first three pages of U.S. regular passports, such as a reminder that many countries deny entry to travelers during the last six months of their passport validity period. Sec. 6104 requires the State Department to submit to Congress a strategy on reducing passport processing time and providing urgent in-person passport services. Sec. 6105 requires the GAO to review National Passport Information Center operations and customer service. Sec. 6108 establishes a statutory right for State Department employees to appeal assignment-related decisions, including denials of an assignment based on a restriction or preclusion. This right to appeal shall be the same as the right of an employee to appeal a denial or revocation of a security clearance. The section also establishes various requirements related to assignments and denials, such as requiring the State Department to (1) notify its personnel of assignment request denials due to assignment restrictions, (2) establish reasonable time lines to complete adjudications of ongoing assignment reviews, and (3) establish a security appeal panel for those denied an assignment due to an assignment restriction. Sec. 6109 requires the State Department to ensure that all foreign language instructors at the Foreign Service Institute are subject to suitability reviews and background investigations. The section also requires the State Department to conduct continuous vetting or reinvestigations for those personnel. Sec. 6110 authorizes the State Department to establish diplomatic security fellowship programs to provide grants to undergraduate students who commit to pursuing a career in diplomatic security. For additional information see CRS In Focus IF12044, The U.S. Department of State: Background and Selected Issues for the 118th Congress, and CRS In Focus IF12466, State Department Passport Services: Background and Issues for Congress. TITLE LXII--PERSONNEL MATTERS Sec. 6202 authorizes the State Department to, during the three-year period after this bill's enactment, directly appoint up to 80 candidates under a special hiring authority to positions in the competitive (civil) service positions relating to (1) data science, (2) information technology, and (3) human resources management. Sec. 6204 extends authority for the State Department Lateral Entry Program, a program established in 2016 targeting midcareer individuals from the civil service and private sector with valuable skills and experience for appointment to the Foreign Service for two years. The section also requires the State Department to include no fewer than 30 participants in the program each year and not to use Foreign Service-limited or other noncareer Foreign Service hiring authorities in the program. Sec. 6205 authorizes the State Department to establish a midcareer mentoring program for selected members of the Foreign Service. Sec. 6207 requires the State Department to provide an annual list to the President of 5-10 career civil servants serving at the State Department or the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) who are qualified to serve as chiefs of mission. Sec. 6208 requires the State Department to establish a pilot program to provide qualified civil servants at the State Department opportunities to serve at a U.S. embassy. Sec. 6211 allows the continuation of retirement annuity payments to individuals who become employed by the State Department. Specifically, this section applies to individuals who are receiving a retirement annuity under the Foreign Service Retirement and Disability System or the Foreign Service Pension System. Sec. 6212 requires the State Department to take a number of actions regarding the reporting and resolution of allegations of discrimination, bullying, and harassment, such as conducting various surveys relating to such issues. Furthermore, if an employee has made allegations of discrimination, bullying, or harassment against the superior responsible for reviewing the performance of the employee, the employee shall instead be reviewed by the superior's supervisor. Sec. 6214 authorizes the State Department and USAID to increase the number of diplomats in the Diplomats in Residence Program. Subtitle B--Pay, Benefits, and Workforce Matters Sec. 6222 requires the State Department to pay a per diem allowance to certain newly hired Foreign Service employees in initial training in the Washington, DC area. Sec. 6223 requires the State Department to seek to increase the number of personnel in the Bureau of Medical Services to address mental health needs. Sec. 6224 authorizes the State Department and USAID to provide for unanticipated nonmedical care, including childcare, eldercare, and essential services directly related to caring for an acute injury or illness for employees and their family members. Sec. 6225 authorizes the State Department to provide overseas physical and mental health care services to certain otherwise ineligible individuals in special circumstances if necessary to preserve life or limb or if intended to facilitate an overseas evacuation, recovery, or return. Sec. 6230 requires the State Department to adopt policies and procedures to facilitate the assignment of tandem Foreign Service personnel (generally, couples where both spouses are career or career-candidate Foreign Service employees) to the same diplomatic post or country. The section also requires the State Department to update antinepotism policies so that such rules apply only when an employee and a relative are placed in positions where they jointly and exclusively control government resources or establish government policy. TITLE LXIII--INFORMATION SECURITY AND CYBER DIPLOMACY Sec. 6302 requires the State Department to establish a bureau chief data officer program. The program's goals shall include promoting data fluency across the State Department and increasing the use of data analytics in critical decision-making areas. Sec. 6303 establishes in the State Department a Senior Executive Service position for chief artificial intelligence officer. Sec. 6306 authorizes the State Department to establish a digital connectivity and cybersecurity partnership program with foreign countries. The program's duties shall include helping foreign countries (1) expand and increase secure internet access and digital infrastructure in emerging markets; (2) adopt policies that foster open, interoperable, and secure internet; and (3) access U.S. exports of information and communications technology products and services. Sec. 6307 authorizes the State Department to establish a fund and provide assistance to foreign governments and organizations for cyberspace activities, cyber protection, and the development of technology standards that reinforce human rights and democratic values. Sec. 6308 requires the State Department to offer cyber protection support for personal technology devices and personal accounts of at-risk personnel. TITLE LXIV--ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS Sec. 6401 authorizes the State Department to enter into contracts for up to 100 personal services contractors to respond to exigent circumstances and urgent crises abroad. Sec. 6405 requires the President to appoint a special envoy to the Pacific Islands Forum. Sec. 6406 requires the President to appoint a special envoy for Belarus. Sec. 6408 requires the State Department to fund travel through 2027 for family members of persons unlawfully or wrongfully detained abroad to Washington, DC, to facilitate meetings with officials. The section also requires the State Department to make available mental health services to individuals unlawfully or wrongfully detained abroad and their family members. TITLE LXV--ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY Sec. 6504 provides guidance for deal teams in U.S. embassies and consulates abroad. TITLE LXVI--PUBLIC DIPLOMACY Sec. 6601 requires public affairs sections at U.S. embassies and USAID mission program officers abroad to coordinate and prioritize resources for public diplomacy campaigns, including through new media technology and comprehensive community outreach. Sec. 6603 addresses issues relating to the governance of the Voice of America (VOA) and the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM). For example, the bill establishes under statute that the director of VOA has responsibility for all VOA operations. The bill also provides the International Broadcasting Advisory Board with statutory authority to oversee the USAGM and the sole authority to appoint an acting Chief Executive Officer of the USAGM when a vacancy arises. Sec. 6604 establishes the John Lewis Civil Rights Fellowship Program within the J. William Fulbright educational exchange program (commonly referred to as the Fulbright Program). The fellowship program shall honor the legacy of Representative John Lewis and advance U.S. foreign policy priorities by promoting studies, research, and international exchange in the subject of nonviolent civil rights movements around the world. Sec. 6606 extends the authority for the State Department's Global Engagement Center through the end of FY2026. For additional information see CRS Report R46968, U.S. Agency for Global Media: Background, Governance, and Issues for Congress. TITLE LXVII--OTHER MATTERS Sec. 6701 authorizes the State Department to award grants to U.S. college students and educational institutions involved in intern programs at the United Nations and other international organizations. Sec. 6702 requires the State Department to establish training courses on (1) diplomacy at international and multilateral institutions, and (2) broad-based multilateral negotiations. Sec. 6707 authorizes the State Department to enter into a public-private partnership to establish a U.S.-Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) center to support U.S. economic and cultural engagement with Southeast Asia. Sec. 6710 requires the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation to prioritize projects advancing U.S. core national security interests with respect to China. For additional information see CRS In Focus IF11436, U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC). TITLE LXVIII--AUKUS MATTERS Sec. 6812 requires the State Department to establish the positions of senior advisor for the AUKUS partnership and supporting staff. Sec. 6823 authorizes the President to transfer or export defense services to private individuals in Australia to support the development of Australia's submarine industrial base to fulfil AUKUS commitments. Sec. 6831 requires the President to prioritize transferring defense articles and services to Australia and the United Kingdom under AUKUS ahead of all others other than Taiwan and Ukraine. Sec. 6833 authorizes the State Department to exempt certain licensing or other approval requirements for certain defense articles and services between the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom. Sec. 6834 requires the State Department to establish an expedited decision-making process for the transfer of commercial advanced-technology defense articles and services not covered by an exemption under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). Sec. 6835 exempts Australia and the United Kingdom from a congressional reporting requirement for presidential exemptions granted in periodic reviews of the U.S. Munitions List (USML). For additional information see CRS In Focus IF12113, AUKUS and Indo-Pacific Security, CRS Report R47599, AUKUS Pillar 2: Background and Issues for Congress, and CRS In Focus IF12483, U.S. Arms Transfer Restrictions and AUKUS Cooperation. DIVISION G--UNIDENTIFIED ANOMALOUS PHENOMENA DISCLOSURE Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act of 2023 or the UAP Disclosure Act of 2023 This title sets policy regarding Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP). Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 9004 requires the National Archives to establish a collection of records to be known as the Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Records Collection, consisting of record copies of all government, government-provided, and government-funded records relating to unidentified anomalous phenomena, technologies of unknown origin, and nonhuman intelligence. This section also specifies certain requirements for disclosure of these records to the public. Sec. 9007 establishes an Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Records Review Board, consisting of nine U.S. citizens appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. The purpose of this board is to ensure and facilitate the review, transmission to the National Archives, and public disclosure of government records relating to UAP. Sec. 9010 requires the federal government to exercise eminent domain (government seizure of private property for public use without the consent of the property owner) over all recovered technologies of unknown origin and biological evidence of non-human intelligence that may be controlled by private persons or entities. Any such material shall be made available to the UAP Records Review Board. DIVISION H--ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL APPOINTMENT ACT OF 2023 Architect of the Capitol Appointment Act of 2023 This division modifies procedures for appointing and removing the Architect of the Capitol (who is responsible for the operation and care of the Capitol grounds, facilities and art). Sec. 10002 establishes a bipartisan congressional commission to, by majority vote, appoint, reappoint , and remove the Architect. (Currently, the Architect is appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate.) The Architect shall be appointed for a 10-year term and may be reappointed for additional 10-year terms. Sec. 10003 specifies procedures related to the appointment of the Deputy Architect of the Capitol. Specifically, the Architect must appoint a deputy within 120 days of that Architect's appointment or a vacancy in the deputy position. If the Architect fails to appoint a deputy within that time, the commission must appoint one. The Architect must also immediately notify the commission if the deputy position is vacant. Sec. 10004 provides that the Deputy Architect must serve as acting Architect in the event the Architect is absent, disabled, or otherwise unavailable. The section also requires the commission to appoint an acting Architect if there are vacancies in both the Architect and Deputy Architect positions. DIVISION I--FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES FOR SERVICEMEMBERS Fair Debt Collection Practices for Servicemembers Act Sec. 11002 prohibits a debt collector from threatening a servicemember with a reduction of rank, revocation of their security clearance, or military prosecution in the course of collecting a debt. Sec. 11003 requires the GAO to report on the impact of this prohibition on the timely delivery of information to servicemembers, military readiness, and national security. DIVISION J--NATIVE AMERICAN HOUSING ASSISTANCE AND SELF-DETERMINATION REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2023 Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Reauthorization Act of 2023 This division provides federal housing assistance to Indians and Native Hawaiians. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 11003 reauthorizes through FY2030 the Indian Housing Block Grant program. Sec. 11014 reauthorizes through FY2030 the Native Hawaiian Housing Block Grant program. Sec. 11017 authorizes the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to guarantee housing loans for Indians through FY2030. Sec. 11018 authorizes HUD to guarantee housing loans for Native Hawaiians through FY2030. Sec. 11019 authorizes HUD to make grants for use in eliminating drug-related and violent crime. Recipients of such grants must be eligible to receive assistance under the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996. Sec. 11020 provides statutory authority for the Tribal HUD-VASH program, which provides rental assistance and supportive services to Indian veterans who are homeless or at risk of homelessness and living in or near an area where a tribe or tribally designated housing entity provides assistance for affordable housing. DIVISION K--FORT BELKNAP INDIAN COMMUNITY WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT OF 2023 Fort Belknap Indian Community Water Rights Settlement Act of 2023 This division modifies and ratifies a specified water rights settlement agreement entered into by the United States, Montana, and the Fort Belknap Indian Community (i.e., the Gros Ventre and Assiniboine Tribes). Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 11004 authorizes, ratifies, and confirms the water rights settlement agreement between the parties. Sec. 11005 requires the community's water rights to be held in trust for the benefit of the community and its allottees. The community must enact a tribal water code to regulate its water rights. Sec. 11006 authorizes the Department of the Interior and the Department of Agriculture (as applicable) to enter negotiations with Montana to exchange certain state lands for federal lands to be held in trust for the benefit of the community. Sec. 11012 establishes the Aaniiih Nakoda Settlement Trust Fund (and specified accounts) for purposes of carrying out this division. Sec. 11013 establishes the Fort Belknap Indian Community Water Settlement Implementation Fund (and specified accounts) for purposes of carrying out this division. Sec. 11014 provides funding for specified accounts established in the settlement funds. DIVISION L--COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS TITLE LXIX--FEDERAL DATA AND INFORMATION SECURITY This title modifies requirements relating to federal agency data centers. Subtitle A--Federal Data Center Enhancement Act of 2023 Federal Data Center Enhancement Act of 2023 Sec. 11002 requires the General Services Administration (GSA) to establish minimum requirements for new data centers, including regarding the availability and use of new data centers; the use of sustainable energy sources; uptime percentage; protections against power failures, including on-site energy generation and access to multiple transmission paths; protections against physical intrusions and natural disasters; and information security protections. TITLE LXX--STEMMING THE FLOW OF ILLICIT NARCOTICS This title addresses various issues related to border security and DHS. Below are examples of provisions in this title. Subtitle A--Enhancing DHS Drug Seizures Act Enhancing DHS Drug Seizures Act Sec. 11103 authorizes DHS employees to receive danger pay while stationed in a foreign area while that area is experiencing certain conditions, such as civil war, that threaten physical harm or imminent danger to the employee. The danger pay may be for up to 35% of the employee's basic pay. Sec. 11104 authorizes DHS to waive reimbursement for the salaries of DHS employees providing training to foreign-vetted law enforcement or national security units under an agreement with DOD. Sec. 11105 authorizes U.S. Customs and Border Protection to provide air and marine support to foreign governments for certain operations, such as an operation to deter illegal drugs from entering the United States. Sec. 11108 makes it a crime to destroy or significantly damage physical or electronic devices (e.g., fences or cameras) used by the federal government to control a U.S. international border with the intent to achieve certain goals relating to securing financial gain and breaking federal laws. Such crimes shall be punishable by fines, imprisonment of up to five years, or both. Subtitle B--Non-Intrusive Inspection Expansion Act Non-Intrusive Inspection Expansion Act This subtitle requires U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to increase its use of nonintrusive inspection systems to scan passenger and commercial vehicles at land ports of entry. Sec. 11112 requires CBP to use such systems at land ports of entry to scan at least 40% of passenger vehicles and 90% of commercial vehicles entering the United States. Sec. 11113 requires CBP to use such systems to scan at least 10% of all vehicles exiting the United States through a land port of entry. Subtitle C--Securing America's Ports of Entry Act of 2023 Securing America's Ports of Entry Act of 2023 Sec. 11122 requires CBP to increase the number of CBP officers to specified levels. If CBP does not adequately increase personnel, the GAO must submit to Congress a review of CBP hiring practices. Subtitle D--Border Patrol Enhancement Act Border Patrol Enhancement Act Sec. 11132 requires the U.S. Border Patrol to complete a personnel requirements determination model and contract with a research entity to analyze the validity of the model. After the model has been validated, if the Border Patrol does not have enough active agents to meet the staffing level recommended by the model, DHS may hire 600 or more Border Patrol agents above the attrition level during each fiscal year until the staffing level has reached the recommended level. Sec. 11133 establishes a special overtime rate for scheduled overtime hours work for Border Patrol agents in a specified grade. This special overtime rate shall be higher than the standard overtime rate. Sec. 11135 requires Border Patrol agents, employees, and certain contract employees to participate in continuing education on various topics, including (1) the nonlethal use of force policies and deescalation strategies; (2) identifying and responding to vulnerable populations, such as children and victims of human trafficking; and (3) relevant cultural, societal, racial, and religious training. Subtitle E--END FENTANYL Act Eradicating Narcotic Drugs and Formulating Effective New Tools to Address National Yearly Losses of Life Act or the END FENTANYL Act Sec. 11142 requires CBP to review and update, as necessary, manuals and policies related to inspections at ports of entry to ensure the uniformity of inspection practices to effectively detect illegal activity along the border, such as the smuggling of drugs and humans. TITLE LXXI--IMPROVING LOBBYING DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS Subtitle A--Lobbying Disclosure Improvement Act Lobbying Disclosure Improvement Act This subtitle requires registered lobbyists to disclose whether they are exempt from having to register as foreign agents due to their lobbying activities and status as registered lobbyists. Subtitle B--Disclosing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act Disclosing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act This subtitle requires registered lobbyists to disclose any foreign countries or political parties that are involved in the direction, planning, supervision, or control of the lobbyist's activities. TITLE LXXII--PROTECTING OUR DOMESTIC WORKFORCE AND SUPPLY CHAIN This title addresses various issues related to supply chains and military spouse employment. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Subtitle B--Intergovernmental Critical Minerals Task Force Act Intergovernmental Critical Minerals Task Force Act This subtitle requires the President to establish a task force to assess the extent to which the United States relies on China and certain other nations for critical minerals, the resulting national security risks associated with this, and to make recommendations to secure United States and global supply chains for critical minerals. (Currently, the U.S. Geological Survey lists 50 such minerals.) Subtitle C--Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism Pilot Program Act of 2023 Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism Pilot Program Act of 2023 or the CTPAT Pilot Program Act of 2023 This subtitle requires DHS to carry out a pilot program that assesses whether allowing certain third-party logistics providers to participate in the Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (CTPAT) would meet the goals of CTPAT, such as enhancing port security and combating terrorism. Third-party logistics providers eligible for the pilot program are either (1) non-asset-based providers that arrange international freight transportation and are licensed by the Department of Transportation; or (2) asset-based providers that facilitate cross-border activity, execute logistics services using their own warehousing assets and resources, and are licensed or bonded by specified federal agencies. Subtitle D--Military Spouse Employment Act Military Spouse Employment Act Sec. 11332 allows executive agencies to appoint military spouses to remote work positions. (The current appointment authority does not specifically extend to remote positions.) Sec. 11333 requires the GAO to report on the general use of remote work by agencies, including the number and location of employees working remotely and the effects on recruitment, retention, and office space utilization and spending. For additional information see CRS Insight IF12217, FY2024 NDAA: Military Spouse Employment Matters, and CRS Report R46498, Military Spouse Employment. DIVISION M--INTELLIGENCE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024 Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 This division authorizes various intelligence-related activities for FY2024 and addresses related issues. TITLE I--INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES This title authorizes appropriations for FY2024 for (1) the conduct of intelligence and intelligence-related activities by the federal government, (2) the intelligence community management account, and (3) increases in employee compensation and benefits authorized by law. TITLE II--CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY RETIREMENT AND DISABILITY SYSTEM This title authorizes appropriations for the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability Fund. TITLE III--INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY MATTERS This title sets policy on various matters related to the intelligence community (there are 18 component organizations within the intelligence community). Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 301 requires the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to submit to Congress a plan for the intelligence community to recruit, train and retain personnel with skills and experience in financial intelligence and emerging technologies. Sec. 303 expands eligibility to receive in-state tuition rates at public institutions of higher education to active duty members of the intelligence community in the state where the member is domiciled or stationed. The spouses and dependent children of such members shall also be eligible for in-state tuition. Sec. 306 specifies that the mission of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center shall include organizing and leading strategic planning for U.S. government counterintelligence activities by integrating instruments of national power as needed to counter foreign intelligence activities. Sec. 307 prohibits the elements of the intelligence community from chartering any private or commercial aircraft to transport an individual who is or was detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Sec. 323 requires the CIA to establish and implement a standard workplace sexual misconduct complaint investigation procedure. TITLE IV--MATTERS CONCERNING FOREIGN COUNTRIES This title sets policy for the intelligence community regarding certain foreign countries. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 401 requires the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) to designate a senior official to serve as the intelligence community coordinator for accountability of China's atrocities (i.e., crimes against humanity, genocide, or war crimes). Sec. 402 requires the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to establish an interagency working group within the intelligence community to analyze China's tactics and capabilities in Africa, including efforts to (1) exploit mining and reprocessing operations, (2) provide or fund telecommunications and energy technologies, and (3) expand intelligence capabilities. For additional information see CRS In Focus IF11735, China's "One Belt, One Road" Initiative: Economic Issues, CRS In Focus IF12469, China and the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), and CRS In Focus IF12265,China Primer: Human Rights. TITLE V--MATTERS PERTAINING TO UNITED STATES ECONOMIC AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGY COMPETITION WITH UNITED STATES ADVERSARIES This title sets policy for the intelligence community with regards to competition with certain foreign adversaries. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 501 authorizes the ODNI to assign or facilitate the assignment of members from across the intelligence community to serve as detailees to the Bureau of Industry and Security at the Department of Commerce. Sec. 511 expands an existing reporting requirement for an intelligence community working group on China's economic and technological capabilities. Specifically, the working group's annual report to Congress must include an assessment of China's investments in certain technologies, such as artificial intelligence, next-generation energy technologies, and biotechnology. TITLE VI--WHISTLEBLOWER MATTERS This title addresses protections for whistleblowers (generally, federal government employees or contractors who disclose their reasonable belief of certain issues such as a violation of law or a substantial danger to public health and safety), including issues involving individuals who lose their security clearances as retaliation for their whistleblowing activities. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 601 requires intelligence community inspectors general to appoint security officers to provide confidential, security-related guidance to employees and contract employees who intend to make a complaint or provide information to Congress. The section also modifies procedures for employees and contractors to report such complaints or information directly to Congress. Sec. 603 modifies provisions relating to determining whether an adverse security clearance (or access) determination was reprisal for whistleblowing activity. For example, this section raises the standard of proof that the agency must meet to raise the defense that it would have made the adverse security clearance determination even without the whistleblowing activity. The section also amends the statute to explicitly state that circumstantial evidence may be used to establish that the whistleblowing activity was a contributing factor in the adverse security determination, and provides examples of such circumstantial evidence. TITLE VII--CLASSIFICATION REFORM This title sets policy with regards to classified information. Subtitle A--Classification Reform Act of 2023 Classification Reform Act of 2023 This subtitle requires the President to take certain actions related to classifying information, including by narrowing exemptions to rules that require the automatic declassification of certain information. Sec. 703 provides statutory authority for the President to protect national security information from unauthorized disclosure. The section also requires the President to establish categories of classified information and procedures to both classify and declassify such information. Such procedures must meet certain requirements, such as narrowing the criteria for classification and providing for narrower exemptions from automatic declassification than Executive Order 13526, which currently controls classified national security information. Executive Order 13526 shall remain in effect until superseded by the procedures required by this section. Sec. 704 requires certain federal agencies (including the Department of Justice, the Department of Defense, and the Central Intelligence Agency) to designate at least one senior officer to serve as the principal advisor for identifying records of significant public interest and prioritizing review of such records to facilitate public disclosure in redacted or unredacted form. Subtitle B--Sensible Classification Act of 2023 Sensible Classification Act of 2023 This subtitle provides statutory authority with regards to requirements pertaining to classifying information, including who is authorized to classify information originally (that is, in the first instance). Sec. 714 establishes under statute that only certain individuals have the authority to classify information in the first instance, such as the President, the Vice President when exercising executive authority, and certain other officials who have been delegated such authority. The section also establishes statutory limits and requirements related to the delegation of such authority. For example, the section establishes that delegation of such authority must be limited to the minimum required to administer this section. Under this section, individuals designated with such authority must receive training on safeguarding classified information and sanctions that may be applied to those who fail to protect classified information from unauthorized disclosure. Sec. 715 requires executive branch agencies to review and process records for declassification and release if the records are over 25 years old and responsive to certain requests for information (such as a request under the Freedom of Information Act). Furthermore, the section requires executive branch agencies to conduct training for employees with classification authority to promote classification at the minimum level sufficient to protect U.S. national security and discourage overclassification. TITLE VIII--SECURITY CLEARANCE AND TRUSTED WORKFORCE This title sets policy with regards to personnel vetting and security clearances. Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 801 requires the ODNI to submit a review to Congress on the extent to which the intelligence community can use information technology services shared among the intelligence community for personnel vetting, including with respect to human resources, suitability, and security. Sec. 802 requires the Security Executive Agent and the Suitability and Credentialing Executive Agent to establish timeliness performance standards for processing personnel vetting trust determinations. (Trust determinations include determinations about suitability, fitness, and eligibility for access to classified information). The section also authorizes the ODNI to establish complementary standards for the intelligence community. Sec. 805 prohibits any element of the intelligence community from denying eligibility to access classified information to an individual solely based on the individual's use of cannabis prior to applying for a security clearance. TITLE IX--ANOMALOUS HEALTH INCIDENTS This title sets policy with regards to payments to certain government personnel and their dependents who incur certain brain injuries while on assignment. (Since 2016, some intelligence, diplomatic, and other governmental personnel have reported experiencing unusual cognitive and neurological impairments while on assignment, particularly abroad, the source of which is currently under investigation.) Below are some examples of provisions in this title. Sec. 901 permits certain reprogrammed funds to be used to make disability payments for certain brain injuries sustained by CIA officers and employees (and their dependents). Sec. 902 specifies that eligibility for a special payment for certain brain injuries incurred by CIA officers and employees is not contingent on the claimant first applying for federal workers compensation benefits. Sec. 903 requires each element of the intelligence community to implement two statutory authorities related to compensation for certain brain injuries, or to provide a report to Congress explaining why those authorities are not relevant to a given element. TITLE X--ELECTION SECURITY This title directs the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) to conduct penetration testing as part of the testing, certification, decertification, and recertification of voting system hardware and software by accredited laboratories. The National Institute of Standards and Technology must recommend entities to the EAC to carry out this penetration testing and the EAC must vote on the accreditation of any recommended entity. The title also directs the EAC to create a five-year pilot program for participating cybersecurity researchers to test for and disclose cybersecurity vulnerabilities in election systems. TITLE XI--OTHER MATTERS This title includes provisions related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP). For example, Sec. 1102 prohibits the use of appropriated funds in support of classified or restricted activities related to UAP, unless such activities have been officially explained and justified to Congress and the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office.