SHOP SAFE Act

To amend the Trademark Act of 1946 to provide for contributory liability for certain electronic commerce platforms for use of a counterfeit mark by a third party on such platforms, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Stopping Harmful Offers on Platforms by Screening Against Fakes in E-commerce Act SHOP SAFE Act 2. Contributory liability for electronic commerce platforms Section 32 of the Act entitled An Act to provide for the registration and protection of trademarks used in commerce, to carry out the provisions of certain international conventions, and for other purposes Trademark Act of 1946 15 U.S.C. 1114 (4) (A) An electronic commerce platform shall be contributorily liable in a civil action under paragraph (1) for a case in which a third-party seller uses in commerce a counterfeit mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of goods that implicate health and safety on the platform, unless the platform demonstrates that the platform took each of the following steps to prevent such use on the platform before any infringing act by the third-party seller: (i) Determined after a reasonable investigation, and reasonably periodically confirmed— (I) that the third-party seller designated a registered agent in the United States for service of process; or (II) in the case of third-party seller located in the United States that has not designated a registered agent under subclause (I), that the third-party seller has designated a verified address for service of process in the United States. (ii) Verified through reliable documentation, including to the extent possible some form of government-issued identification, the identity, principal place of business, and contact information of the third-party seller. (iii) Except as provided for in subparagraph (C), required the third-party seller to— (I) take reasonable steps to verify the authenticity of goods on or in connection with which a registered mark is used; and (II) attest to the platform that the third-party seller has taken reasonable steps under subclause (I) to verify the authenticity of the goods. (iv) Imposed on the third-party seller as a condition of participating on the platform contractual requirements that— (I) the third-party seller agrees not to use a counterfeit mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of goods on the platform; (II) the third-party seller consents to the jurisdiction of United States courts with respect to claims related to participation by the third-party seller on the platform; and (III) the third-party seller designates an agent for service of process in the United States, or, in the case of third-party seller located in the United States, the third-party seller designates a verified address for service of process in the United States. (v) Displayed conspicuously on the platform the verified principal place of business, contact information, and identity of the third-party seller, and the country from which the goods were originally shipped from the third-party seller, except the platform shall not be required to display any such information that constitutes the personal identity of an individual, a residential street address, or personal contact information of an individual, and in such cases shall instead provide alternative, verified means of contacting the third-party seller. (vi) Except as provided for in subparagraph (C), displayed conspicuously in each listing the country of origin and manufacture of the goods as identified by the third-party seller, unless such information was not reasonably available to the third-party seller and the third-party seller has identified to the platform the steps it undertook to identify the country of origin and manufacture of the goods and the reasons it was unable to identify the same. (vii) Required each third-party seller to use images that accurately depict the goods sold, offered for sale, distributed, or advertised on the platform. (viii) Implemented at no charge from the platform to the registrant reasonable proactive measures for screening goods before displaying the goods to the public to prevent the use by any third-party seller of a counterfeit mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of goods on the platform. The determination of whether proactive measures are reasonable shall consider the size and resources of a platform, the available technological and non-technological solutions at the time of screening, the information provided by the registrant to the platform, and any other factor considered relevant by a court. (ix) Provided reasonably accessible electronic means by which a registrant and consumer can notify the platform of suspected use of a counterfeit mark. (x) Implemented at no charge from the platform to the registrant a program to expeditiously disable or remove from the platform any listing for which a platform has reasonable awareness of use of a counterfeit mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of goods. Reasonable awareness of use of a counterfeit mark may be inferred based on information regarding the use of a counterfeit mark on the platform generally, general information about the third-party seller, identifying characteristics of a particular listing, or other circumstances as appropriate. A platform may reinstate a listing disabled or removed under this clause if, after an investigation, the platform reasonably determines that a counterfeit mark was not used in the listing. A reasonable decision to reinstate a listing shall not be a basis for finding that a platform failed to comply with this clause. (xi) Implemented a publicly available, written policy that requires termination of a third-party seller that reasonably has been determined to have engaged in repeated use of a counterfeit mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of goods on the platform. Use of a counterfeit mark by a third-party seller in 3 separate listings within 1 year typically shall be considered repeated use, but a platform may allow a third-party seller to remain active after repeated use of a counterfeit mark when reasonable mitigating circumstances exist. The determination of whether reasonable mitigating circumstances exist shall consider the overall activity of the third-party seller, efforts the third-party seller has taken to cure supply-chain concerns, efforts the third party takes to resolve disputes once notified of a concern, and any other factor considered relevant by a court. A platform may reinstate a third-party seller if, after an investigation, the platform reasonably determines that the third-party seller did not engage in repeated use of a counterfeit mark or that reasonable mitigating circumstances existed. A reasonable decision to reinstate a third-party seller shall not be a basis for finding that a platform failed to comply with this clause. (xii) Implemented at no charge from the platform to the registrant reasonable measures for screening third-party sellers to ensure that sellers who have been terminated do not rejoin or remain on the platform under a different seller identity or alias. The determination of whether screening measures are reasonable shall consider the size and resources of a platform, the available technological and non-technological solutions at the time of screening, and any other factor considered relevant by a court. (xiii) Provided a verified basis to contact a third-party seller upon request by a registrant that has a bona fide belief that the seller has used a counterfeit mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of goods on the platform except that the platform is not required to provide information that constitutes the personal identity of an individual, a residential street address, or personal contact information of an individual (in such case, the provider shall provide an alternative means of contacting the third-party seller). (B) (i) This paragraph shall apply— (I) to an electronic commerce platform that has sales on the platform in the previous calendar year of not less than $500,000; or (II) to an electronic commerce platform with less than $500,000 in sales in the previous calendar year, 6 months after the platform has received 10 notices, in aggregate, that qualify under clause (ii). (ii) To count toward the aggregate 10-notice threshold under clause (i)(II), a notice shall— (I) include a reference to this paragraph; (II) include an explicit notification of the 10-notice limit and the requirement of the platform to publish the information in clause (iii); and (III) identify a listing on the platform that reasonably could be determined to have used a counterfeit mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of goods that implicate health and safety. (iii) Within 1 month of receiving the first notice under clause (ii), a platform with less than $500,000 in sales in the previous calendar year shall publish publicly an attestation that the sales on the platform in the previous calendar year were less than $500,000, and an aggregate count of notices that qualify under clause (ii). The aggregate count of notices should be updated as additional notices are received. (C) Notwithstanding clauses (iii) and (vi) of subparagraph (A), a platform is exempt from the requirements of such clauses for goods, on or in connection with which a registered mark is used, sold, offered for sale, or advertised by a third-party seller for less than $5,000 if the third-party seller sells, offers for sale, or advertises on the platform 5 or fewer goods of the same type in connection with the same mark in a 1-year period. (D) This paragraph may not be construed to limit liability in contexts other than those described in this paragraph, including any cause of action available under any other provision of this Act, notwithstanding that the same facts may give rise to a claim under this paragraph. (E) For each fiscal year commencing after December 31, 2023, the amounts in subparagraphs (B) and (C) shall be increased each year by an amount equal to the percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index. (F) In this paragraph: (i) The term counterfeit mark (ii) The term electronic commerce platform (iii) The term goods that implicate health and safety (iv) The term third-party seller . 3. Material misrepresentations in take-down notices (a) Amendment The Trademark Act of 1946 is amended by inserting after section 32 ( 15 U.S.C. 1114 32A. Material misrepresentations in take-down notices (a) Civil liability Any person who knowingly makes any material misrepresentation in a notice to an electronic commerce platform that a counterfeit mark was used in a listing by a third-party seller for goods that implicate health and safety shall be liable in a civil action for damages by the third-party seller that is injured by such misrepresentation, as the result of the electronic commerce platform relying upon such misrepresentation to remove or disable access to the listing, including temporary removal or disablement. (b) Action by electronic commerce platform (1) Authority to bring action If a third-party seller who otherwise could bring an action under subsection (a), consents and declines to file suit, an electronic commerce platform may bring an action under subsection (a) against a person who knowingly made a material misrepresentation in 10 or more notices to the platform alleging that a counterfeit mark was used in a listing by a third-party seller for goods that implicate health and safety. (2) Consent by third-party seller required Consent shall be obtained in writing from each third-party seller to which the notices covered by the civil action were directed. (3) Contents of consent The consent by a third-party seller shall be made in specific reference to a particular notice after the notice has been filed with the electronic commerce platform and removal or disablement has occurred. (c) Statutory damages Any person who brings a claim under this section may elect, at any time before final judgment is rendered by the trial court, to recover, instead of actual damages, statutory damages in the amount of— (1) not less than $2,500 or more than $15,000 per notice containing a knowing, material misrepresentation; or (2) if aggravating circumstances exist, not less than $15,000 or more than $75,000 per notice containing a knowing, material misrepresentation. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) Counterfeit mark The term counterfeit mark (2) Electronic commerce platform; Goods that implicate health and safety; Third-party seller The terms electronic commerce platform goods that implicate health and safety third-party seller . (b) Technical and conforming amendment Section 35(a) of The Trademark Act of 1946 ( 15 U.S.C. 1117(a) under section 43(a) or (d), a violation under subsection (a) or (b) of section 32A, 4. Effective date This Act, and the amendments made by this Act, shall take effect on the date that is 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Summary: Stopping Harmful Offers on Platforms by Screening Against Fakes in E-commerce Act or the SHOP SAFE Act This bill makes an electronic commerce platform liable for infringement of a registered trademark by a third-party seller of goods that implicate health and safety unless the platform takes certain actions. Specifically, the platform may be contributorily liable if the seller uses a counterfeit mark in connection with selling, offering, or advertising such goods on the platform. The platform may avoid such liability by taking certain actions before the infringing act, including (1) requiring the seller to have a registered agent or a verified address for service of process in the United States, (2) verifying the seller's identity and contact information, (3) requiring the seller to agree to not use counterfeit marks with goods sold on the platform, (4) implementing procedures for trademark owners to request the removal of listings for counterfeit goods, and (5) implementing policies to remove and ban repeat offenders. A person who knowingly makes a material misrepresentation in a request to a platform to take down a seller listing (because the listing allegedly uses a counterfeit mark and implicates health and safety concerns) shall be civilly liable to the seller injured by the resulting improper takedown. If a person makes 10 or more such improper takedown requests, the platform may sue on behalf of the sellers who consent to the platform's lawsuit. A party suing under this bill may choose to receive statutory damages (as opposed to actual damages) of $2,500-$75,000 for each improper request, depending on the circumstances of the case.