Securing America’s Elections Act of 2023

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to require voting systems used in elections for Federal office to produce a voter-verified paper ballot of each vote cast on the system, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Securing America’s Elections Act of 2023 2. Promoting accuracy, integrity, and security through voter-verified permanent paper ballot (a) Ballot verification and audit capacity (1) In general Section 301(a)(2) of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 ( 52 U.S.C. 21081(a)(2) (2) Ballot verification and audit capacity (A) Voter-verified paper ballots (i) Verification (I) The voting system shall require the production of a voter-verified paper ballot of the voter’s vote that shall be created by or made available for inspection and verification by the individual voter before the voter’s vote is cast and counted. For purposes of this subclause, a voter-verified paper ballot includes (but is not limited to) a paper ballot marked by the voter for the purpose of being counted by hand or read by an optical scanner or other similar device, a paper ballot prepared by the voter to be mailed to an election official (whether from a domestic or overseas location), a paper ballot created through the use of a ballot marking device or system, or a paper ballot produced by a touch screen or other electronic voting machine, so long as in each case the voter is permitted to verify the ballot in a paper form in accordance with this subparagraph. (II) The voting system shall provide the voter with an opportunity to correct any error made by the system in the voter-verified paper ballot before the permanent voter-verified paper ballot is preserved in accordance with clause (ii). (III) The voting system shall not preserve the voter-verified paper ballots in any manner that makes it possible, at any time after the ballot has been cast, to associate a voter with the record of the voter’s vote. (ii) Preservation The voter-verified paper ballot produced in accordance with clause (i) shall be used as the official ballot for purposes of any recount or audit conducted with respect to any election for Federal office in which the voting system is used, and shall be preserved in accordance with regulations promulgated by the Commission to establish criteria for the proper preservation and retention of the official ballots in the election. (iii) Manual audit capacity Each paper ballot produced pursuant to clause (i) shall be suitable for a manual audit equivalent to that of a paper ballot voting system, in accordance with the methods described in subparagraph (B). (B) Approved methods for manual audits The methods described in this subparagraph with respect to the manual audit of voter-verified paper ballots are— (i) audits conducted through the use of programmable electronic counting machines which are not capable of being connected to the Internet, as determined in accordance with regulations promulgated by the Commission; or (ii) if no machine described in clause (i) is available, an audit conducted by a hand count. (C) Resolution of disputes when paper ballots have been shown to be compromised In the event that the paper ballots produced pursuant to subparagraph (A) with respect to an election for Federal office have been compromised, the State shall resolve the dispute over the results of the election in accordance with dispute resolution processes established under regulations promulgated by the Commission. (D) Deadline for promulgation of regulations The Commission shall promulgate the regulations described in this paragraph not later than November 1, 2023. . (2) Conforming amendment clarifying applicability of alternative language accessibility Section 301(a)(4) of such Act ( 52 U.S.C. 21081(a)(4) (including the paper ballots required to be produced under paragraph (2)) voting system (3) Other conforming amendments Section 301(a)(1) of such Act ( 52 U.S.C. 21081(a)(1) (A) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking counted counted, in accordance with paragraphs (2) and (3) (B) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by striking counted counted, in accordance with paragraphs (2) and (3) (C) in subparagraph (A)(iii), by striking counted counted, in accordance with paragraphs (2) and (3) (D) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking counted counted, in accordance with paragraphs (2) and (3) (b) Availability of additional funding To enable States To meet costs of revised requirement (1) Extension of requirements payments for meeting revised requirement; amounts deemed to meet requirements for emergency funding Section 257(a) of such Act ( 52 U.S.C. 21007(a) (5) For fiscal year 2023, such sums as may be necessary to enable States to meet the requirements of section 301(a)(2) which are first imposed on the State pursuant to the amendments made by section 2(a) of the Securing America’s Elections Act of 2021. Any amount appropriated pursuant to the authorization under this paragraph shall be designated by the Congress as being for an emergency requirement pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985. . (2) Amount of payment based on costs incurred in meeting revised requirements Section 252 of such Act ( 52 U.S.C. 21002 (A) in subsection (a), by striking subsection (c) subsections (c) and (e) (B) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and (C) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection: (e) Special rule for fiscal year 2023 (1) Coverage of costs of meeting revised ballot verification and audit capacity requirements The amount of a requirements payment made to a State from funds appropriated for fiscal year 2023 shall be equal to the State’s estimate of the reasonable costs the State expects to incur to meet the requirements referred to in paragraph (3), as contained in the statement filed by the State with the Commission under section 253(f)(1)(A)(ii). (2) Recoupment of overpayments If a State receives a requirements payment from funds appropriated for fiscal year 2020, the State shall agree to repay to the Commission the excess (if any) of— (A) the amount of the payment; over (B) the actual costs incurred by the State in meeting the requirements referred to in paragraph (3), as contained in the statement filed by the State with the Commission under section 253(f)(1)(B). (3) Requirements described The requirements referred to in this paragraph are the requirements of section 301(a)(2) (relating to ballot verification and audit capacity) which are first imposed on the State pursuant to the amendments made by section 2(a) of the Securing America’s Elections Act of 2023. . (3) Revised conditions for receipt of funds Section 253 of such Act ( 52 U.S.C. 21003 (A) in subsection (a), by striking A State is eligible Except as provided in subsection (f), a State is eligible (B) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (f) Special rule for fiscal year 2023 (1) In general Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, a State is eligible to receive a requirements payment from funds appropriated for fiscal year 2023 if, at any time after the funds are appropriated, the chief executive officer of the State, or designee, in consultation and coordination with the chief State election official— (A) files a statement with the Commission— (i) describing how the State will use the payment to meet the requirements of section 301(a)(2) (relating to ballot verification and audit capacity) which are first imposed on the State pursuant to the amendment made by section 2(a) of the Securing America’s Elections Act of 2023, and (ii) containing the State’s estimate of the reasonable costs the State expects to incur to meet such requirements; and (B) certifies to the Commission that, upon completing the replacement or upgrading of its voting systems to meet such requirements, the State will file a statement with the Commission containing the actual costs incurred by the State in meeting such requirements. (2) Certifications by States that require changes to State law In the case of a State that requires State legislation to carry out any activity covered by any certification submitted under this subsection, the State shall be permitted to make the certification notwithstanding that the legislation has not been enacted at the time the certification is submitted and such State shall submit an additional certification once such legislation is enacted. . (4) Permitting use of funds for reimbursement for costs previously incurred Section 251(c)(1) of such Act ( 52 U.S.C. 21001(c)(1) , or as a reimbursement for any costs incurred in meeting the requirements of section 301(a)(2) which are first imposed pursuant to the amendments made by section 2(a) of the Securing America’s Elections Act of 2023 or in otherwise replacing or upgrading voting systems in response to such amendments. (5) Rule of construction regarding use of funds to replace or upgrade systems obtained with funds provided previously under Help America Vote Act of 2002 Nothing in the amendments made by this subsection or in any other provision of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 may be construed to prohibit a State from using any funds provided under such Act pursuant to the amendments made by this subsection (or any funds provided under such Act prior to the date of the enactment of this Act which remain unexpended as of the date of the enactment of this Act) to replace or upgrade a voting system purchased or otherwise obtained in whole or in part using funds received under title I or II of the Help America Vote Act at any time before the date of the enactment of this Act. (6) Effective date The amendments made by this subsection shall apply with respect to fiscal years beginning with fiscal year 2023. (c) Study and report on use of open-Source software in voting systems (1) Study The Secretary of Homeland Security and the Election Assistance Commission, acting jointly, shall conduct a study of the feasibility and desirability of using open-source software in voting systems, based on information obtained from elections for Federal office held in 2020 through 2022. (2) Report Not later than July 1, 2025, the Secretary and the Commission shall submit to Congress a report on the study conducted under paragraph (1), and shall include in the report such recommendations as the Secretary and Commission consider appropriate regarding the possible use of open-source software in the voting systems used to administer elections for Federal office held in 2024. (3) Development and maintenance of software If the Secretary and the Commission include in the report submitted under paragraph (2) a recommendation that State election officials use open-source software in the voting systems used to administer elections for Federal office in the State— (A) the Commission shall enter into a partnership with appropriate private entities, including entities engaged in the business of maintaining open-source software, to develop, test, certify, and maintain open-source software for such purpose for elections held in 2028 or any succeeding year; and (B) the Commission shall ensure that such certified software is available without cost to State election officials. (d) Effective date for new requirements Section 301(d) of such Act ( 52 U.S.C. 21081(d) (d) Effective Date (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (2), each State and jurisdiction shall be required to comply with the requirements of this section on and after January 1, 2006. (2) Special rule for certain requirements The requirements of subsection (a)(2) which are first imposed on a State and jurisdiction pursuant to the amendments made by section 2(a) of the Securing America’s Elections Act of 2023 shall apply with respect to the regularly scheduled general election for Federal office held in November 2024 and each succeeding election for Federal office. .

Summary: Securing America's Elections Act of 2023 This bill requires voting systems for federal elections to produce paper ballots that the voter may inspect and verify before the vote is cast and counted. The bill also (1) requires the paper ballot to be suitable for manual audits, (2) prescribes approved methods for such audits, and (3) directs the Department of Homeland Security and the Election Assistance Commission to report on the desirability of using open-source software in voting systems.