National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020

To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2020 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents (a) Divisions This Act is organized into four divisions as follows: (1) Division A—Department of Defense Authorizations. (2) Division B—Military Construction Authorizations. (3) Division C—Department of Energy National Security Authorizations and Other Authorizations. (4) Division D—Funding Tables. (b) Table of contents The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title. Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents. Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees. Sec. 4. Budgetary effects of this Act. DIVISION A—Department of Defense Authorizations TITLE I—Procurement Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 101. Authorization of appropriations. Subtitle B—Army Programs Sec. 111. Sense of Senate on Army's approach to Capability Drops 1 and 2 of the Distributed Common Ground System-Army program. Sec. 112. Authority of the Secretary of the Army to waive certain limitations related to the Distributed Common Ground System-Army Increment 1. Subtitle C—Navy programs Sec. 121. Modification of prohibition on availability of funds for Navy waterborne security barriers. Sec. 122. Capabilities based assessment for naval vessels that carry fixed-wing aircraft. Sec. 123. Ford-class aircraft carrier cost limitation baselines. Sec. 124. Design and construction of amphibious transport dock designated LPD–31. Sec. 125. LHA Replacement Amphibious Assault Ship Program. Sec. 126. Limitation on availability of funds for the Littoral Combat Ship. Sec. 127. Limitation on the next new class of Navy large surface combatants. Sec. 128. Refueling and complex overhauls of the U.S.S. John C. Stennis and U.S.S. Harry S. Truman. Sec. 129. Report on carrier wing composition. Subtitle D—Air Force Programs Sec. 141. Requirement to align Air Force fighter force structure with National Defense Strategy and reports. Sec. 142. Requirement to establish the use of an Agile DevOps software development solution as an alternative for Joint Strike Fighter Autonomic Logistics Information System. Sec. 143. Report on feasibility of multiyear contract for procurement of JASSM–ER missiles. Sec. 144. Air Force aggressor squadron modernization. Sec. 145. Air Force plan for Combat Rescue Helicopter fielding. Sec. 146. Military type certification for AT–6 and A–29 light attack experimentation aircraft. Subtitle E—Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters Sec. 151. Limitation on availability of funds for communications systems lacking certain resiliency features. Sec. 152. F–35 sustainment cost. Sec. 153. Economic order quantity contracting authority for F–35 Joint Strike Fighter program. Sec. 154. Repeal of tactical unmanned vehicle common data link requirement. TITLE II—Research, development, test, and evaluation Subtitle A—Authorization of appropriations Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations. Subtitle B—Program requirements, restrictions, and limitations Sec. 211. Development and acquisition strategy to procure secure, low probability of detection data link network capability. Sec. 212. Establishment of secure next-generation wireless network (5G) infrastructure for the Nevada Test and Training Range and base infrastructure. Sec. 213. Limitation and report on Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2 enduring capability. Sec. 214. Electromagnetic spectrum sharing research and development program. Sec. 215. Sense of the Senate on the Advanced Battle Management System. Sec. 216. Modification of proof of concept commercialization program. Sec. 217. Modification of Defense quantum information science and technology research and development program. Sec. 218. Technology and National Security Fellowship. Sec. 219. Direct Air Capture and Blue Carbon Removal Technology Program. Subtitle C—Reports and other matters Sec. 231. National security emerging biotechnologies research and development program. Sec. 232. Cyber science and technology activities roadmap and reports. Sec. 233. Requiring certain microelectronics products and services meet trusted supply chain and operational security standards. Sec. 234. Technical correction to Global Research Watch Program. Sec. 235. Additional technology areas for expedited access to technical talent. Sec. 236. Sense of the Senate and periodic briefings on the security and availability of fifth-generation (5G) wireless network technology and production. Sec. 237. Transfer of Combating Terrorism Technical Support Office. Sec. 238. Briefing on cooperative defense technology programs and risks of technology transfer to China or Russia. Sec. 239. Modification of authority for prizes for advanced technology achievements. Sec. 240. Use of funds for Strategic Environmental Research Program, Environmental Security Technical Certification Program, and Operational Energy Capability Improvement. Sec. 241. Funding for the Sea-Launched Cruise Missile–Nuclear analysis of alternatives. Sec. 242. Review and assessment pertaining to transition of Department of Defense-originated dual-use technology. TITLE III—Operation and Maintenance Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 301. Authorization of appropriations. Subtitle B—Energy and Environment Sec. 311. Use of operational energy cost savings of Department of Defense. Sec. 312. Use of proceeds from sales of electrical energy generated from geothermal resources. Sec. 313. Energy resilience programs and activities. Sec. 314. Native American Indian lands environmental mitigation program. Sec. 315. Reimbursement of Environmental Protection Agency for certain costs in connection with the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant, Minnesota. Sec. 316. Prohibition on use of perfluoroalkyl substances and polyfluoroalkyl substances for land-based applications of firefighting foam. Sec. 317. Transfer authority for funding of study and assessment on health implications of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances contamination in drinking water by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Sec. 318. Cooperative agreements with States to address contamination by perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances. Sec. 319. Modification of Department of Defense environmental restoration authorities to include Federal Government facilities used by National Guard. Sec. 320. Budgeting of Department of Defense relating to extreme weather. Sec. 321. Pilot program for availability of working-capital funds for increased combat capability through energy optimization. Sec. 322. Report on efforts to reduce high energy intensity at military installations. Sec. 323. Technical and grammatical corrections and repeal of obsolete provisions relating to energy. Subtitle C—Logistics and Sustainment Sec. 331. Requirement for memoranda of understanding between the Air Force and the Navy regarding depot maintenance. Sec. 332. Modification to limitation on length of overseas forward deployment of naval vessels. Subtitle D—Reports Sec. 341. Report on modernization of Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex. Subtitle E—Other Matters Sec. 351. Strategy to improve infrastructure of certain depots of the Department of Defense. Sec. 352. Limitation on use of funds regarding the basing of KC–46A aircraft outside the continental United States. Sec. 353. Prevention of encroachment on military training routes and military operations areas. Sec. 354. Expansion and enhancement of authorities on transfer and adoption of military animals. Sec. 355. Limitation on contracting relating to Defense Personal Property Program. Sec. 356. Prohibition on subjective upgrades by commanders of unit ratings in monthly readiness reporting on military units. Sec. 357. Extension of temporary installation reutilization authority for arsenals, depots, and plants. Sec. 358. Clarification of food ingredient requirements for food or beverages provided by the Department of Defense. Sec. 359. Technical correction to deadline for transition to Defense Readiness Reporting System Strategic. TITLE IV—Military Personnel Authorizations Subtitle A—Active Forces Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces. Subtitle B—Reserve Forces Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve. Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the reserves. Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status). Sec. 414. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support. Sec. 415. Authorized strengths for Marine Corps Reserves on active duty. Subtitle C—Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 421. Military personnel. TITLE V—Military Personnel Policy Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy Sec. 501. Repeal of codified specification of authorized strengths of certain commissioned officers on active duty. Sec. 502. Maker of original appointments in a regular or reserve component of commissioned officers previously subject to original appointment in other type of component. Sec. 503. Furnishing of adverse information on officers to promotion selection boards. Sec. 504. Limitation on number of officers recommendable for promotion by promotion selection boards. Sec. 505. Expansion of authority for continuation on active duty of officers in certain military specialties and career tracks. Sec. 506. Higher grade in retirement for officers following reopening of determination or certification of retired grade. Sec. 507. Availability on the Internet of certain information about officers serving in general or flag officer grades. Subtitle B—Reserve Component Management Sec. 511. Repeal of requirement for review of certain Army Reserve officer unit vacancy promotions by commanders of associated active duty units. Subtitle C—General Service Authorities Sec. 515. Modification of authorities on management of deployments of members of the Armed Forces and related unit operating and personnel tempo matters. Sec. 516. Repeal of requirement that parental leave be taken in one increment. Sec. 517. Digital engineering as a core competency of the Armed Forces. Sec. 518. Modification of notification on manning of afloat naval forces. Sec. 519. Report on expansion of the Close Airman Support team approach of the Air Force to the other Armed Forces. Subtitle D—Military Justice and Related Matters PART I—Matters Relating to Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault Generally Sec. 521. Department of Defense-wide policy and military department-specific programs on reinvigoration of the prevention of sexual assault involving members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 522. Enactment and expansion of policy on withholding of initial disposition authority for certain offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Sec. 523. Training for Sexual Assault Initial Disposition Authorities on exercise of disposition authority for sexual assault and collateral offenses. Sec. 524. Expansion of responsibilities of commanders for victims of sexual assault committed by another member of the Armed Forces. Sec. 525. Training for commanders in the Armed Forces on their role in all stages of military justice in connection with sexual assault. Sec. 526. Notice to victims of alleged sexual assault of pendency of further administrative action following a determination not to refer to trial by court-martial. Sec. 527. Safe to report policy applicable across the Armed Forces. Sec. 528. Report on expansion of Air Force safe to report policy across the Armed Forces. Sec. 529. Proposal for separate punitive article in the Uniform Code of Military Justice on sexual harassment. Sec. 530. Treatment of information in Catch a Serial Offender Program for certain purposes. Sec. 531. Report on preservation of recourse to restricted report on sexual assault for victims of sexual assault following certain victim or third-party communications. Sec. 532. Authority for return of personal property to victims of sexual assault who file a Restricted Report before conclusion of related proceedings. Sec. 533. Extension of Defense Advisory Committee on Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault in the Armed Forces. Sec. 534. Defense Advisory Committee for the Prevention of Sexual Misconduct. Sec. 535. Independent reviews and assessments on race and ethnicity in the investigation, prosecution, and defense of sexual assault in the Armed Forces. Sec. 536. Report on mechanisms to enhance the integration and synchronization of activities of Special Victim Investigation and Prosecution personnel with activities of military criminal investigative organizations. Sec. 537. Comptroller General of the United States report on implementation by the Armed Forces of recent statutory requirements on sexual assault prevention and response in the military. PART II—Special Victims' Counsel Matters Sec. 541. Legal assistance by Special Victims' Counsel for victims of alleged domestic violence offenses. Sec. 542. Other Special Victims' Counsel matters. Sec. 543. Availability of Special Victims' Counsel at military installations. Sec. 544. Training for Special Victims' Counsel on civilian criminal justice matters in the States of the military installations to which assigned. PART III—Boards for Correction of Military Records and Discharge Review Board Matters Sec. 546. Repeal of 15-year statute of limitations on motions or requests for review of discharge or dismissal from the Armed Forces. Sec. 547. Reduction in required number of members of discharge review boards. Sec. 548. Enhancement of personnel on boards for the correction of military records and discharge review boards. Sec. 549. Inclusion of intimate partner violence and spousal abuse among supporting rationales for certain claims for corrections of military records and discharge review. Sec. 550. Advice and counsel of trauma experts in review by boards for correction of military records and discharge review boards of certain claims. Sec. 551. Training of members of boards for correction of military records and discharge review boards on sexual trauma, intimate partner violence, spousal abuse, and related matters. Sec. 552. Limitations and requirements in connection with separations for members of the Armed Forces who suffer from mental health conditions in connection with a sex-related, intimate partner violence-related, or spousal-abuse offense. Sec. 553. Liberal consideration of evidence in certain claims by boards for the correction of military records and discharge review boards. PART IV—Other Military Justice Matters Sec. 555. Expansion of pre-referral matters reviewable by military judges and military magistrates in the interest of efficiency in military justice. Sec. 556. Policies and procedures on registration at military installations of civilian protective orders applicable to members of the Armed Forces assigned to such installations and certain other individuals. Sec. 557. Increase in number of digital forensic examiners for the military criminal investigative organizations. Sec. 558. Survey of members of the Armed Forces on their experiences with military investigations and military justice. Sec. 559. Public access to dockets, filings, and court records of courts-martial or other records of trial of the military justice system. Sec. 560. Pilot programs on defense investigators in the military justice system. Sec. 561. Report on military justice system involving alternative authority for determining whether to prefer or refer changes for felony offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Sec. 562. Report on standardization among the military departments in collection and presentation of information on matters within the military justice system. Sec. 563. Report on establishment of guardian ad litem program for certain military dependents who are a victim or witness of offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice involving abuse or exploitation. Subtitle E—Member Education, Training, Transition, and Resilience Sec. 566. Consecutive service of service obligation in connection with payment of tuition for off-duty training or education for commissioned officers of the Armed Forces with any other service obligations. Sec. 567. Authority for detail of certain enlisted members of the Armed Forces as students at law schools. Sec. 568. Connections of members retiring or separating from the Armed Forces with community-based organizations and related entities. Subtitle F—Defense Dependents' Education and Military Family Readiness Matters PART I—Defense Dependents' Education Matters Sec. 571. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees. Sec. 572. Impact aid for children with severe disabilities. Sec. 573. Ri’katak Guest Student Program at United States Army Garrison−Kwajalein Atoll. PART II—Military Family Readiness Matters Sec. 576. Two-year extension of authority for reimbursement for State licensure and certification costs of spouses of members of the Armed Forces arising from relocation to another State. Sec. 577. Improvement of occupational license portability for military spouses through interstate compacts. Sec. 578. Modification of responsibility of the Office of Special Needs for individualized service plans for members of military families with special needs. Sec. 579. Clarifying technical amendment on direct hire authority for the Department of Defense for childcare services providers for Department child development centers. Sec. 580. Pilot program on information sharing between Department of Defense and designated relatives and friends of members of the Armed Forces regarding the experiences and challenges of military service. Sec. 581. Briefing on use of Family Advocacy Programs to address domestic violence. Subtitle G—Decorations and Awards Sec. 585. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to John J. Duffy for acts of valor in Vietnam. Sec. 586. Standardization of honorable service requirement for award of military decorations. Sec. 587. Authority to award or present a decoration not previously recommended in a timely fashion following a review requested by Congress. Sec. 588. Authority to make posthumous and honorary promotions and appointments following a review requested by Congress. Subtitle H—Other Matters Sec. 591. Military funeral honors matters. Sec. 592. Inclusion of homeschooled students in Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps units. Sec. 593. Sense of Senate on the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps. TITLE VI—Compensation and Other Personnel Benefits Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances Sec. 601. Expansion of eligibility for exceptional transitional compensation for dependents to dependents of current members. Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain expiring bonus and special pay authorities. Subtitle C—Travel and Transportation Allowances Sec. 621. Extension of pilot program on a Government lodging program. Sec. 622. Reinvestment of travel refunds by the Department of Defense. Subtitle D—Disability Pay, Retired Pay, and Survivor Benefits Sec. 631. Contributions to Department of Defense Military Retirement Fund based on pay costs per Armed Force rather than on Armed Forces-wide basis. Sec. 632. Modification of authorities on eligibility for and replacement of gold star lapel buttons. Subtitle E—Commissary and Non-Appropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and Operations Sec. 641. Defense resale system matters. Sec. 642. Treatment of fees on services provided as supplemental funds for commissary operations. Sec. 643. Procurement by commissary stores of certain locally sourced products. TITLE VII—Health Care Provisions Subtitle A—TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits Sec. 701. Contraception coverage parity under the TRICARE program. Sec. 702. TRICARE payment options for retirees and their dependents. Sec. 703. Lead level screening and testing for children. Sec. 704. Provision of blood testing for firefighters of Department of Defense to determine exposure to perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances. Subtitle B—Health Care Administration Sec. 711. Modification of organization of military health system. Sec. 712. Support by military health system of medical requirements of combatant commands. Sec. 713. Tours of duty of commanders or directors of military treatment facilities. Sec. 714. Expansion of strategy to improve acquisition of managed care support contracts under TRICARE program. Sec. 715. Establishment of regional medical hubs to support combatant commands. Sec. 716. Monitoring of adverse event data on dietary supplement use by members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 717. Enhancement of recordkeeping with respect to exposure by members of the Armed Forces to certain occupational and environmental hazards while deployed overseas. Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters Sec. 721. Extension and clarification of authority for Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund. Sec. 722. Appointment of non-ex officio members of the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine. Sec. 723. Officers authorized to command Army dental units. Sec. 724. Establishment of Academic Health System in National Capital Region. Sec. 725. Provision of veterinary services by veterinary professionals of the Department of Defense in emergencies. Sec. 726. Five-year extension of authority to continue the DOD-VA Health Care Sharing Incentive Fund. Sec. 727. Pilot Program on civilian and military partnerships to enhance interoperability and medical surge capability and capacity of National Disaster Medical System. Sec. 728. Modification of requirements for longitudinal medical study on blast pressure exposure of members of the Armed Forces. TITLE VIII—Acquisition policy, acquisition management, and related matters Subtitle A—Contracting and acquisition provisions Sec. 801. Pilot program on intellectual property evaluation for acquisition programs. Sec. 802. Pilot program to use alpha contracting teams for complex requirements. Sec. 803. Modification of written approval requirement for task and delivery order single contract awards. Sec. 804. Extension of authority to acquire products and services produced in countries along a major route of supply to Afghanistan. Sec. 805. Modification of Director of Operational Test and Evaluation report. Sec. 806. Department of Defense use of fixed-price contracts. Sec. 807. Pilot program to accelerate contracting and pricing processes. Sec. 808. Pilot program to streamline decision-making processes for weapon systems. Sec. 809. Documentation of market research related to commercial item determinations. Sec. 810. Modification to small purchase threshold exception to sourcing requirements for certain articles. Subtitle B—Provisions relating to major defense acquisition programs Sec. 821. Naval vessel certification required before Milestone B approval. Subtitle C—Industrial base matters Sec. 831. Modernization of acquisition processes to ensure integrity of industrial base. Sec. 832. Assessment of precision-guided missiles for reliance on foreign-made microelectronic components. Sec. 833. Mitigating risks related to foreign ownership, control, or influence of Department of Defense contractors or subcontractors. Sec. 834. Extension and revisions to Never Contract With the Enemy. Subtitle D—Small Business Matters Sec. 841. Reauthorization and improvement of Department of Defense Mentor-Protégé Program. Sec. 842. Modification of justification and approval requirement for certain Department of Defense contracts. Subtitle E—Provisions related to software-Driven capabilities Sec. 851. Improved management of information technology and cyberspace investments. Sec. 852. Special pathways for rapid acquisition of software applications and upgrades. Subtitle F—Other Matters Sec. 861. Notification of Navy procurement production disruptions. Sec. 862. Modification to acquisition authority of the Commander of the United States Cyber Command. Sec. 863. Prohibition on operation or procurement of foreign-made unmanned aircraft systems. Sec. 864. Prohibition on contracting with persons that have business operations with the Maduro regime. Sec. 865. Comptroller General of the United States report on Department of Defense efforts to combat human trafficking through procurement practices. TITLE IX—Department of Defense Organization and Management Subtitle A—Office of the Secretary of Defense and Related Matters 901. Headquarters activities of the Department of Defense matters. 902. Responsibility of Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment for Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program. 903. Return to Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense of responsibility for business systems and related matters. 904. Senior Military Advisor for Cyber Policy and Deputy Principal Cyber Advisor. 905. Limitation on transfer of Strategic Capabilities Office. Subtitle B—Organization and Management of Other Department of Defense Offices and Elements 911. Assistant Secretaries of the military departments for Energy, Installations, and Environment. 912. Repeal of conditional designation of Explosive Ordnance Disposal Corps as a basic branch of the Army. Subtitle C—Other Matters 921. Exclusion from limitations on personnel in the Office of the Secretary of Defense and Department of Defense headquarters of fellows appointed under the John S. McCain Defense Fellows Program. 922. Report on resources to implement the civilian casualty policy of the Department of Defense. TITLE X—General Provisions Subtitle A—Financial Matters Sec. 1001. General transfer authority. Sec. 1002. Modification of required elements of annual reports on emergency and extraordinary expenses of the Department of Defense. Sec. 1003. Inclusion of military construction projects in annual reports on unfunded priorities of the Armed Forces and the combatant commands. Sec. 1004. Prohibition on delegation of responsibility for submittal to Congress of Out-Year Unconstrained Total Munitions Requirements and Out-Year Inventory numbers. Sec. 1005. Element in annual reports on the Financial Improvement and Audit Remediation Plan on activities with respect to classified programs. Sec. 1006. Modification of semiannual briefings on the consolidated corrective action plan of the Department of Defense for financial management information. Sec. 1007. Update of authorities and renaming of Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund. Subtitle B—Counterdrug Activities Sec. 1011. Modification of authority to support a unified counterdrug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia. Sec. 1012. Two-year extension of authority for joint task forces to provide support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities. Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards Sec. 1016. Modification of authority to purchase vessels using funds in National Defense Sealift Fund. Sec. 1017. Senior Technical Authority for each naval vessel class. Sec. 1018. Permanent authority for sustaining operational readiness of Littoral Combat Ships on extended deployment. Subtitle D—Counterterrorism Sec. 1021. Extension of prohibition on use of funds for transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States. Sec. 1022. Extension of prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the United States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Sec. 1023. Extension of prohibition on use of funds for transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to certain countries. Sec. 1024. Extension of prohibition on use of funds to close or relinquish control of United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Sec. 1025. Authority to transfer individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States temporarily for emergency or critical medical treatment. Sec. 1026. Chief Medical Officer at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Subtitle E—Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations Sec. 1031. Clarification of authority of military commissions under chapter 47A Sec. 1032. Comprehensive Department of Defense policy on collective self-defense. Sec. 1033. Oversight of Department of Defense execute orders. Sec. 1034. Prohibition on ownership or trading of stocks in certain companies by Department of Defense officers and employees. Sec. 1035. Policy regarding the transition of data and applications to the cloud. Sec. 1036. Modernization of inspection authorities applicable to the National Guard and extension of inspection authority to the Chief of the National Guard Bureau. Sec. 1037. Enhancement of authorities on forfeiture of Federal benefits by the National Guard. Sec. 1038. Modernization of authorities on property and fiscal officers of the National Guard. Sec. 1039. Limitation on placement by the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness of work with federally funded research and development centers. Sec. 1040. Termination of requirement for Department of Defense facility access clearances for joint ventures composed of previously-cleared entities. Sec. 1041. Designation of Department of Defense Strategic Arctic Ports. Sec. 1042. Extension of National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence. Sec. 1043. Authority to transfer funds for Bien Hoa dioxin cleanup. Sec. 1044. Limitation on use of funds to house children separated from parents. Subtitle F—Studies and Reports Sec. 1051. Modification of annual reporting requirements on defense manpower. Sec. 1052. Report on Department of Defense efforts to implement a force planning process in support of implementation of the 2018 National Defense Strategy. Sec. 1053. Extension of annual reports on civilian casualties in connection with United States military operations. Sec. 1054. Report on joint force plan for implementation of strategies of the Department of Defense for the Arctic. Sec. 1055. Report on use of Northern Tier bases in implementation of Arctic strategy of the United States. Sec. 1056. Report on the Department of Defense plan for mass-casualty disaster response operations in the Arctic. Sec. 1057. Annual reports on approval of employment or compensation of retired general or flag officers by foreign governments for Emoluments Clause purposes. Sec. 1058. Transmittal to Congress of requests for assistance received by the Department of Defense from other departments. Sec. 1059. Semiannual report on Consolidated Adjudication Facility of the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency. Sec. 1060 Comptroller General of the United States report on post-government employment of former Department of Defense officials. Subtitle G—Treatment of Contaminated Water Near Military Installations Sec. 1071. Short title. Sec. 1072. Definitions. Sec. 1073. Provision of water uncontaminated with perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) for agricultural purposes. Sec. 1074. Acquisition of real property by Air Force. Sec. 1075. Remediation plan. Subtitle H—Other Matters Sec. 1081. Revision to authorities relating to mail service for members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilians overseas. Sec. 1082. Access to and use of military post offices by United States citizens employed overseas by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization who perform functions in support of military operations of the Armed Forces. Sec. 1083. Guarantee of residency for spouses of members of uniformed services. Sec. 1084. Extension of requirement for briefings on the national biodefense strategy. Sec. 1085. Extension of National Commission on Military Aviation Safety. TITLE XI—Civilian Personnel Matters Sec. 1101. Modification of temporary assignments of Department of Defense employees to a private-sector organization. Sec. 1102. Modification of number of available appointments for certain agencies under personnel management authority to attract experts in science and engineering. Sec. 1103. One-year extension of temporary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to civilian personnel on official duty in a combat zone. Sec. 1104. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees working overseas. Sec. 1105. Reimbursement of Federal employees for Federal, State, and local income taxes incurred during travel, transportation, and relocation. TITLE XII—Matters relating to foreign nations Subtitle A—Assistance and training Sec. 1201. Extension of support of special operations for irregular warfare. Sec. 1202. Extension of authority for cross servicing agreements for loan of personnel protection and personnel survivability equipment in coalition operations. Sec. 1203. Two-year extension of program authority for Global Security Contingency Fund. Sec. 1204. Modification of reporting requirement for use of funds for security cooperation programs and activities. Sec. 1205. Institutional legal capacity building initiative for foreign defense forces. Sec. 1206. Department of Defense support for stabilization activities in national security interest of the United States. Subtitle B—Matters relating to Afghanistan and Pakistan Sec. 1211. Extension of authority to transfer defense articles and provide defense services to the military and security forces of Afghanistan. Sec. 1212. Afghanistan Security Forces Fund. Sec. 1213. Extension of Commanders' Emergency Response Program. Sec. 1214. Extension and modification of reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations. Sec. 1215. Support for reconciliation activities led by the Government of Afghanistan. Sec. 1216. Sense of Senate on special immigrant visa program for Afghan allies. Subtitle C—Matters relating to Syria, Iraq, and Iran Sec. 1221. Modification of authority to provide assistance to vetted Syrian groups. Sec. 1222. Extension of authority and limitation on use of funds to provide assistance to counter the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. Sec. 1223. Extension and modification of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq. Sec. 1224. Coordinator of United States Government activities and matters in connection with detainees who are members of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. Sec. 1225. Report on lessons learned from efforts to liberate Mosul and Raqqah from control of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. Subtitle D—Matters relating to Europe and the Russian Federation Sec. 1231. Prohibition on availability of funds relating to sovereignty of the Russian Federation over Crimea. Sec. 1232. Prohibition on use of funds for withdrawal of Armed Forces from Europe in the event of United States withdrawal from the North Atlantic Treaty. Sec. 1233. Extension of limitation on military cooperation between the United States and the Russian Federation. Sec. 1234. Modification and extension of Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative. Sec. 1235. Extension of authority for training for Eastern European national security forces in the course of multilateral exercises. Sec. 1236. Limitation on transfer of F–35 aircraft to the Republic of Turkey. Sec. 1237. Modifications of briefing, notification, and reporting requirements relating to non-compliance by the Russian Federation with its obligations under the INF Treaty. Sec. 1238. Extension and modification of security assistance for Baltic nations for joint program for interoperability and deterrence against aggression. Sec. 1239. Report on North Atlantic Treaty Organization Readiness Initiative. Sec. 1240. Reports on contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Sec. 1241. Future years plans for European Deterrence Initiative. Sec. 1242. Modification of reporting requirements relating to the Open Skies Treaty. Sec. 1243. Report on nuclear weapons of the Russian Federation and nuclear modernization of the People's Republic of China. Sec. 1244. Sense of Senate on the 70th anniversary of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Sec. 1245. Sense of Senate on United States force posture in Europe and the Republic of Poland. Sec. 1246. Sense of Senate on United States partnership with the Republic of Georgia. Subtitle E—Matters relating to the Indo-Pacific region Sec. 1251. Limitation on use of funds to reduce the total number of members of the Armed Forces in the territory of the Republic of Korea. Sec. 1252. Expansion of Indo-Pacific Maritime Security Initiative. Sec. 1253. Modification of annual report on military and security developments involving the People's Republic of China. Sec. 1254. Report on resourcing United States defense requirements for the Indo-Pacific region. Sec. 1255. Report on distributed lay-down of United States forces in the Indo-Pacific region. Sec. 1256. Sense of Senate on the United States-Japan alliance and defense cooperation. Sec. 1257. Sense of Senate on enhancement of the United States-Taiwan defense relationship. Sec. 1258. Sense of Senate on United States-India defense relationship. Sec. 1259. Sense of Senate on security commitments to the Governments of Japan and the Republic of Korea and trilateral cooperation among the United States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea. Sec. 1260. Sense of Senate on enhanced cooperation with Pacific Island countries to establish open-source intelligence fusion centers in the Indo-Pacific region. Sec. 1261. Sense of Senate on enhancing defense and security cooperation with the Republic of Singapore. Subtitle F—Reports Sec. 1271. Report on cost imposition strategy. Subtitle G—Other matters Sec. 1281. NATO Special Operations Headquarters. Sec. 1282. Modifications of authorities relating to acquisition and cross-servicing agreements. Sec. 1283. Modification of authority for United States-Israel anti-tunnel cooperation activities. Sec. 1284. United States-Israel cooperation to counter unmanned aerial systems. Sec. 1285. Modification of initiative to support protection of national security academic researchers from undue influence and other security threats. Sec. 1286. Independent assessment of human rights situation in Honduras. Sec. 1287. United States Central Command posture review. Sec. 1288. Reports on expenses incurred for in-flight refueling of Saudi coalition aircraft conducting missions relating to civil war in Yemen. Sec. 1289. Sense of Senate on security concerns with respect to leasing arrangements for the Port of Haifa in Israel. TITLE XIII—COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION Sec. 1301. Funding allocations for Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program. TITLE XIV—Other Authorizations Subtitle A—Military Programs Sec. 1401. Working capital funds. Sec. 1402. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense. Sec. 1403. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. Sec. 1404. Defense Inspector General. Sec. 1405. Defense Health Program. Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile Sec. 1411. Modification of prohibition on acquisition of sensitive materials from non-allied foreign nations. Subtitle C—Armed Forces Retirement Home Sec. 1421. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home. Sec. 1422. Expansion of eligibility for residence at the Armed Forces Retirement Home. Subtitle D—Other Matters Sec. 1431. Authority for transfer of funds to joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois. TITLE XV—Authorization of additional appropriations for overseas contingency operations Subtitle A—Authorization of additional appropriations Sec. 1501. Purpose. Sec. 1502. Overseas contingency operations. Sec. 1503. Procurement. Sec. 1504. Research, development, test, and evaluation. Sec. 1505. Operation and maintenance. Sec. 1506. Military personnel. Sec. 1507. Working capital funds. Sec. 1508. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. Sec. 1509. Defense Inspector General. Sec. 1510. Defense Health Program. Subtitle B—Financial matters Sec. 1521. Treatment as additional authorizations. Sec. 1522. Special transfer authority. TITLE XVI—Strategic programs, cyber, and intelligence matters Subtitle A—Space Activities PART I—United States Space Force Sec. 1601. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space Policy. Sec. 1602. Principal Assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force for Space Acquisition and Integration. Sec. 1603. Military space forces within the Air Force. Sec. 1604. Redesignation of Air Force Space Command as United States Space Force. Sec. 1605. Assignment of personnel to the National Reconnaissance Office for mission needs. Sec. 1606. Report on establishment of position of Under Secretary of the Air Force for Space. Sec. 1607. Report on enhanced integration of capabilities of the National Security Agency, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, and the United States Space Command for joint operations. Sec. 1608. Limitation on availability of funds. PART II—Other space matters Sec. 1611. Repeal of requirement to establish Space Command as a subordinate unified command of the United States Strategic Command. Sec. 1612. Program to enhance and improve launch support and infrastructure. Sec. 1613. Modification of enhancement of positioning, navigation, and timing capacity. Sec. 1614. Modification of term of Commander of Air Force Space Command. Sec. 1615. Annual report on Space Command and Control program. Sec. 1616. Requirements for phase 2 of acquisition strategy for National Security Space Launch program. Subtitle B—Defense intelligence and intelligence-related activities Sec. 1621. Redesignation of Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence as Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security. Sec. 1622. Repeal of certain requirements relating to integration of Department of Defense intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities. Sec. 1623. Improving the onboarding methodology for certain intelligence personnel. Sec. 1624. Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency activities on facilitating access to local criminal records historical data. Subtitle C—Cyberspace-related matters Sec. 1631. Reorientation of Big Data Platform program. Sec. 1632. Zero-based review of Department of Defense cyber and information technology personnel. Sec. 1633. Study on improving cyber career paths in the Navy. Sec. 1634. Framework to enhance cybersecurity of the United States defense industrial base. Sec. 1635. Role of Chief Information Officer in improving enterprise-wide cybersecurity. Sec. 1636. Quarterly assessments of the readiness of cyber forces. Sec. 1637. Control and analysis of Department of Defense data stolen through cyberspace. Sec. 1638. Accreditation standards and processes for cybersecurity and information technology products and services. Sec. 1639. Extension of authorities for Cyberspace Solarium Commission. Sec. 1640. Modification of elements of assessment required for termination of dual-hat arrangement for Commander of the United States Cyber Command. Sec. 1641. Use of National Security Agency cybersecurity expertise to support acquisition of commercial cybersecurity products. Sec. 1642. Study on future cyber warfighting capabilities of Department of Defense. Sec. 1643. Authority to use operation and maintenance funds for cyber operations-peculiar capability development projects. Sec. 1644. Expansion of authority for access and information relating to cyberattacks on Department of Defense operationally critical contractors. Sec. 1645. Briefing on memorandum of understanding relating to joint operational planning and control of cyber attacks of national scale. Sec. 1646. Study to determine the optimal strategy for structuring and manning elements of the Joint Force Headquarters–Cyber organizations, Joint Mission Operations Centers, and Cyber Operations–Integrated Planning Elements. Sec. 1647. Cyber governance structures and Principal Cyber Advisors on military cyber force matters. Sec. 1648. Designation of test networks for testing and accreditation of cybersecurity products and services. Sec. 1649. Consortia of universities to advise Secretary of Defense on cybersecurity matters. Subtitle D—Nuclear Forces Sec. 1661. Modification of authorities relating to nuclear command, control, and communications system. Sec. 1662. Expansion of officials required to conduct biennial assessments of delivery platforms for nuclear weapons and nuclear command and control system. Sec. 1663. Conforming amendment to Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, Control, and Communications System. Sec. 1664. Prohibition on reduction of the intercontinental ballistic missiles of the United States. Sec. 1665. Briefing on long-range standoff weapon and sea-launched cruise missile. Sec. 1666. Sense of the Senate on industrial base for Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent program. Sec. 1667. Sense of the Senate on nuclear deterrence commitments of the United States. Subtitle E—Missile defense programs Sec. 1671. Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system and Israeli cooperative missile defense program co-development and co-production. Sec. 1672. Expansion of national missile defense policy and program redesignation. Sec. 1673. Acceleration of the deployment of persistent space-based sensor architecture. Sec. 1674. Nonstandard acquisition processes of Missile Defense Agency. Sec. 1675. Plan for the Redesigned Kill Vehicle. Sec. 1676. Report on improving ground-based midcourse defense element of ballistic missile defense system. Sec. 1677. Sense of the Senate on recent Missile Defense Agency tests. Sec. 1678. Sense of the Senate on missile defense technology development priorities. Sec. 1679. Publication of environmental impact statement prepared for certain potential future missile defense sites. Subtitle F—Other matters Sec. 1681. Matters relating to military operations in the information environment. Sec. 1682. Extension of authorization for protection of certain facilities and assets from unmanned aircraft. Sec. 1683. Hard and deeply buried targets. DIVISION B—Military construction authorizations Sec. 2001. Short title. Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law. Sec. 2003. Effective date. TITLE XXI—Army military construction Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2102. Family housing. Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army. Sec. 2104. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2019 project. TITLE XXII—Navy military construction Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2202. Family housing. Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units. Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. TITLE XXIII—Air Force military construction Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2302. Family housing. Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units. Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force. Sec. 2305. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2015 project. Sec. 2306. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2016 project. Sec. 2307. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2017 project. Sec. 2308. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2018 projects. Sec. 2309. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2019 projects. TITLE XXIV—Defense Agencies military construction Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2402. Authorized Energy Resilience and Conservation Investment Program projects. Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies. TITLE XXV—International programs Subtitle A—North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO. Subtitle B—Host Country In-Kind Contributions Sec. 2511. Republic of Korea funded construction projects. TITLE XXVI—Guard and Reserve Forces facilities Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve. TITLE XXVII—Base realignment and closure activities Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account. Sec. 2702. Prohibition on conducting additional base realignment and closure (BRAC) round. TITLE XXVIII—Military construction general provisions Subtitle A—Military Construction Program Sec. 2801. Military installation resilience plans and projects of Department of Defense. Sec. 2802. Prohibition on use of funds to reduce air base resiliency or demolish protected aircraft shelters in the European theater without creating a similar protection from attack. Sec. 2803. Prohibition on use of funds to close or return to the host nation any existing air base. Sec. 2804. Increased authority for certain unspecified minor military construction projects. Sec. 2805. Technical corrections and improvements to installation resilience. Subtitle B—Land Conveyances Sec. 2811. Release of interests retained in Camp Joseph T. Robinson, Arkansas, for use of such land as a veterans cemetery. Sec. 2812. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction over certain parcels of Federal land in Arlington, Virginia. Sec. 2813. Modification of requirements relating to land acquisition in Arlington County, Virginia. Sec. 2814. White Sands Missile Range Land Enhancements. Subtitle C—Other Matters Sec. 2821. Equal treatment of insured depository institutions and credit unions operating on military installations. Sec. 2822. Expansion of temporary authority for acceptance and use of contributions for certain construction, maintenance, and repair projects mutually beneficial to the Department of Defense and Kuwait military forces. Sec. 2823. Designation of Sumpter Smith Joint National Guard Base. Sec. 2824. Prohibition on use of funds to privatize temporary lodging on installations of Department of Defense. Sec. 2825. Pilot program to extend service life of roads and runways under the jurisdiction of the Secretaries of the military departments. TITLE XXIX—Overseas contingency operations military construction Sec. 2901. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2902. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2903. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2904. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2905. Disaster recovery projects. Sec. 2906. Replenishment of certain military constructions funds. Sec. 2907. Authorization of appropriations. TITLE XXX—Military housing privatization reform Sec. 3001. Definitions. Subtitle A—Accountability and Oversight Sec. 3011. Tenant bill of rights for privatized military housing. Sec. 3012. Designation of Chief Housing Officer for privatized military housing. Sec. 3013. Command oversight of military privatized housing as element of performance evaluations. Sec. 3014. Consideration of history of landlord in contract renewal process for privatized military housing. Sec. 3015. Treatment of breach of contract for privatized military housing. Sec. 3016. Uniform code of basic standards for privatized military housing and plan to conduct inspections and assessments. Sec. 3017. Repeal of supplemental payments to lessors and requirement for use of funds in connection with the Military Housing Privatization Initiative. Sec. 3018. Standard for common credentials for health and environmental inspectors of privatized military housing. Sec. 3019. Improvement of privatized military housing. Sec. 3020. Access to maintenance work order system of landlords of privatized military housing. Sec. 3021. Access by tenants of privatized military housing to work order system of landlord. Subtitle B—Prioritizing Families Sec. 3031. Dispute resolution process for landlord-tenant disputes regarding privatized military housing and requests to withhold payments. Sec. 3032. Suspension of Resident Energy Conservation Program. Sec. 3033. Access by tenants to historical maintenance information for privatized military housing. Sec. 3034. Prohibition on use of call centers outside the United States for maintenance calls by tenants of privatized military housing. Sec. 3035. Radon testing for privatized military housing. Sec. 3036. Expansion of windows covered by requirement to use window fall prevention devices in privatized military housing. Sec. 3037. Requirements relating to move out and maintenance with respect to privatized military housing. Subtitle C—Long-Term Quality Assurance Sec. 3041. Development of standardized documentation, templates, and forms for privatized military housing. Sec. 3042. Council on privatized military housing. Sec. 3043. Requirements relating to management of privatized military housing. Sec. 3044. Requirements relating to contracts for privatized military housing. Sec. 3045. Withholding of incentive fees for landlords of privatized military housing for failure to remedy a health or environmental hazard. Sec. 3046. Expansion of direct hire authority for Department of Defense for childcare services providers for Department child development centers to include direct hire authority for installation military housing office personnel. Sec. 3047. Plan on establishment of Department of Defense jurisdiction over off-base privatized military housing. Subtitle D—Other Housing Matters Sec. 3051. Lead-based paint testing and reporting. Sec. 3052. Satisfaction survey for tenants of military housing. Sec. 3053. Information on legal services provided to members of the Armed Forces harmed by health or environmental hazards at military housing. Sec. 3054. Mitigation of risks posed by certain items in military family housing units. Sec. 3055. Technical correction to certain payments for lessors of privatized military housing. Sec. 3056. Pilot program to build and monitor use of single family homes. DIVISION C—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS TITLE XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS Subtitle A—National Security Programs and Authorizations Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration. Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup. Sec. 3103. Other defense activities. Sec. 3104. Nuclear energy. Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations Sec. 3111. Technical corrections to National Nuclear Security Administration Act and Atomic Energy Defense Act. Sec. 3112. National Nuclear Security Administration Personnel System. Sec. 3113. Contracting, program management, scientific, engineering, and technical positions at National Nuclear Security Administration. Sec. 3114. Prohibition on use of laboratory-directed research and development funds for general and administrative overhead costs. Sec. 3115. Prohibition on use of funds for advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium. Subtitle C—Plans and Reports Sec. 3121. Estimation of costs of meeting defense environmental cleanup milestones required by consent orders. Sec. 3122. Extension of suspension of certain assessments relating to nuclear weapons stockpile. Sec. 3123. Repeal of requirement for review relating to enhanced procurement authority. Sec. 3124. Determination of effect of treaty obligations with respect to producing tritium. Sec. 3125. Assessment of high energy density physics. TITLE XXXII—DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD Sec. 3201. Authorization. Sec. 3202. Improvement of management and organization of Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. Sec. 3203. Membership of Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. TITLE XXXV—MARITIME ADMINISTRATION Sec. 3501. Maritime Administration. DIVISION D—Funding Tables Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables. TITLE XLI—Procurement Sec. 4101. Procurement. Sec. 4102. Procurement for overseas contingency operations. TITLE XLII—Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation Sec. 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation. Sec. 4202. Research, development, test, and evaluation for overseas contingency operations. TITLE XLIII—Operation and Maintenance Sec. 4301. Operation and maintenance. Sec. 4302. Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations. TITLE XLIV—Military Personnel Sec. 4401. Military personnel. Sec. 4402. Military personnel for overseas contingency operations. TITLE XLV—Other Authorizations Sec. 4501. Other authorizations. Sec. 4502. Other authorizations for overseas contingency operations. TITLE XLVI—Military Construction Sec. 4601. Military construction. Sec. 4602. Military construction for overseas contingency operations. TITLE XLVII—Department of Energy National Security Programs Sec. 4701. Department of Energy national security programs. 3. Congressional defense committees In this Act, the term congressional defense committees 4. Budgetary effects of this Act The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purposes of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation A Department of Defense Authorizations I Procurement A Authorization of Appropriations 101. Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for procurement for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4101. B Army Programs 111. Sense of Senate on Army's approach to Capability Drops 1 and 2 of the Distributed Common Ground System-Army program It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) the Senate approves of the approach of the Army to Capability Drops 1 and 2 of the Distributed Common Ground System-Army program, which has been in compliance with section 2377 of title 10, United States Code; and (2) the Senate encourages the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment and other military departments and commands in the Department of Defense to review the efforts of the Army with Capability Drops 1 and 2 to inform future decisions about how to integrate commercial technology into the Distributed Common Ground System Enterprise and other national security systems. 112. Authority of the Secretary of the Army to waive certain limitations related to the Distributed Common Ground System-Army Increment 1 Section 113(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 Secretary of Defense Secretary of the Army C Navy programs 121. Modification of prohibition on availability of funds for Navy waterborne security barriers Section 130 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (1) in subsection (a) by striking for fiscal year 2019 may be obligated or expended to procure legacy waterborne security barriers for Navy ports for fiscal year 2019 or fiscal year 2020 may be obligated or expended to procure legacy waterborne security barriers for Navy ports, including as replacements for legacy barriers (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (d) Notification Not later than 15 days after an exception is made pursuant to subsection (c)(2), the Secretary of the Navy shall submit a written notification to the congressional defense committees that includes— (1) the name and position of the government official who determined exigent circumstances exist; (2) a description of the exigent circumstances; and (3) a description of how waterborne security will be maintained until new waterborne security barriers are procured and installed. . 122. Capabilities based assessment for naval vessels that carry fixed-wing aircraft (a) In general Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall initiate a capabilities based assessment to begin the process of identifying requirements for the naval vessels that will carry fixed-wing aircraft following the ships designated CVN–81 and LHA–9. (b) Elements The assessment shall— (1) conform with the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System, including Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 5123.01H; and (2) consider options for the vessels described under subsection (a) that would enable greater commonality and interoperability of naval aircraft embarked on such naval vessels, including aircraft arresting gear and launch catapults. (c) Notification requirement Not later than 15 days after initiating the assessment required under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall notify the congressional defense committees of such action and the associated schedule for completing the assessment and generating an Initial Capabilities Document. 123. Ford-class aircraft carrier cost limitation baselines (a) In general Chapter 633 8692. Ford-class aircraft carrier cost limitation baselines (a) Limitation The total amounts obligated or expended from funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy, or for any other procurement account, may not exceed the following amounts for the following aircraft carriers: (1) $13,027,000,000 for the construction of the aircraft carrier designated CVN–78. (2) $11,398,000,000 for the construction of the aircraft carrier designated CVN–79. (3) $12,202,000,000 for the construction of the aircraft carrier designated CVN–80. (4) $12,451,000,000 for the construction of the aircraft carrier designated CVN–81. (b) Adjustment of limitation amount The Secretary of the Navy may adjust an amount set forth in subsection (a) by the following: (1) The amounts of increases or decreases in costs attributable to economic inflation after September 30, 2019. (2) The amounts of increases or decreases in costs attributable to compliance with changes in Federal, State, or local laws enacted after September 30, 2019. (3) The amounts of outfitting costs and post-delivery costs incurred for that ship. (4) The amounts of increases or decreases in costs of that ship that are attributable to insertion of new technology into that ship, as compared to the technology baseline as it was defined prior to October 1, 2019. (5) The amounts of increases or decreases to cost required to correct deficiencies that may affect the safety of the ship and personnel or otherwise preclude the ship from safe operations and crew certification. (6) With respect to the aircraft carrier designated as CVN–78, the amounts of increases or decreases in costs of that ship that are attributable solely to an urgent and unforeseen requirement identified as a result of the shipboard test program. (7) With respect to the aircraft carrier designated as CVN–79, the amounts of increases not exceeding $100,000,000 if the Chief of Naval Operations determines that achieving the amount set forth in subsection (a)(2) would result in unacceptable reductions to the operational capability of the ship. (c) Limitation on technology insertion cost adjustment The Secretary of the Navy may use the authority under paragraph (4) of subsection (b) to adjust the amount set forth in subsection (a) for a ship referred to in that subsection with respect to insertion of new technology into that ship only if— (1) the Secretary determines, and certifies to the congressional defense committees, that insertion of the new technology would lower the life-cycle cost of the ship; or (2) the Secretary determines, and certifies to the congressional defense committees, that insertion of the new technology is required to meet an emerging threat and the Secretary of Defense certifies to those committees that such threat poses grave harm to national security. (d) Limitation on shipboard test program cost adjustment The Secretary of the Navy may use the authority under paragraph (6) of subsection (b) to adjust the amount set forth in subsection (a) for the aircraft carrier designated CVN–78 for reasons relating to an urgent and unforeseen requirement identified as a result of the shipboard test program only if— (1) the Secretary determines, and certifies to the congressional defense committees, that such requirement was not known before the date of the submittal to Congress of the budget for fiscal year 2020 (as submitted pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code); (2) the Secretary determines, and certifies to the congressional defense committees, that waiting on an action by Congress to raise the cost cap specified in subsection (a)(1) to account for such requirement will result in a delay in the date of initial operating capability of that ship; and (3) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth a description of such requirement before the obligation of additional funds pursuant to such authority. (e) Exclusion of battle and interim spares from cost limitation The Secretary of the Navy shall exclude from the determination of the amounts set forth in subsection (a), the costs of the following items: (1) CVN–78 class battle spares. (2) Interim spares. (f) Written notice of change in amount The Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees written notice of any change in the amount set forth in subsection (a) determined to be associated with a cost covered in subsection (b) not less than 30 days prior to making such change. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 8691 the following new item: § 8692. Ford-class aircraft carrier cost limitation baselines. . (c) Repeal of superseded provision Section 122 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 ( Public Law 109–364 124. Design and construction of amphibious transport dock designated LPD–31 (a) In general The Secretary of the Navy may enter into a contract for the design and construction of the amphibious transport dock designated LPD–31 using amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy. (b) Use of incremental funding With respect to the contract entered into under subsection (a), the Secretary may use incremental funding to make payments under the contract with amounts authorized to be appropriated in fiscal years 2019, 2020, and 2021. (c) Condition for out-year contract payments The contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under such contract for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2020 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such fiscal year. 125. LHA Replacement Amphibious Assault Ship Program (a) Authority to use incremental funding The Secretary of the Navy may enter into and incrementally fund a contract for detail design and construction of the LHA replacement ship designated LHA 9 and, subject to subsection (b), funds for payments under the contract may be provided from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy, for fiscal years 2019 through 2025. (b) Condition for out-year contract payments A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for any subsequent fiscal year is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such subsequent fiscal year. (c) Repeal of obsolete authority Section 125 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 ( Public Law 109–364 126. Limitation on availability of funds for the Littoral Combat Ship (a) Limitation None of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 may be used to exceed the total procurement quantity listed in revision five of the Littoral Combat Ship acquisition strategy unless the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment submits to the congressional defense committees the certification described in subsection (b). (b) Certification The certification described in this subsection is a certification by the Under Secretary that awarding a contract for the procurement of a Littoral Combat Ship that exceeds the total procurement quantity listed in revision five of the Littoral Combat Ship acquisition strategy— (1) is in the national security interests of the United States; (2) will not result in exceeding the low-rate initial production quantity approved in the Littoral Combat Ship acquisition strategy in effect as of the date of the certification; and (3) is necessary to maintain a full and open competition for the Guided Missile Frigate (FFG(X)) with a single source award in fiscal year 2020. (c) Definition The term revision five of the Littoral Combat Ship acquisition strategy 127. Limitation on the next new class of Navy large surface combatants (a) In general Milestone B approval may not be granted for the next new class of Navy large surface combatants unless the class of Navy large surface combatants incorporates prior to such approval— (1) design changes identified during the full duration of the combat system ship qualification trials and operational test periods of the first Arleigh Burke-class destroyer in the Flight III configuration to complete such events; and (2) final results of test programs of engineering development models or prototypes for critical systems specified by the Senior Technical Authority pursuant to section 8669b of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 1017 of this Act, in their final form, fit, and function and in a realistic environment, which shall include a land-based engineering site if the propulsion system will utilize integrated electric power technology, including electric drive propulsion. (b) Limitation The Secretary of the Navy may not release a detail design or construction request for proposals or obligate funds from the Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy account for the next new class of Navy large surface combatants until the class of Navy large surface combatants receives Milestone B approval and the milestone decision authority notifies the congressional defense committees, in writing, of the actions taken to comply with the requirements under subsection (a). (c) Definitions In this section: (1) The term Milestone B approval (2) The term milestone decision authority (3) The term large surface combatants 128. Refueling and complex overhauls of the U.S.S. John C. Stennis and U.S.S. Harry S. Truman (a) Refueling and complex overhaul The Secretary of the Navy shall carry out the nuclear refueling and complex overhaul of the U.S.S. John C. Stennis (CVN–74) and U.S.S. Harry S. Truman (CVN–75). (b) Use of incremental funding With respect to any contract entered into under subsection (a) for the nuclear refueling and complex overhauls of the U.S.S. John C. Stennis (CVN–74) and U.S.S. Harry S. Truman (CVN–75), the Secretary may use incremental funding for a period not to exceed six years after advance procurement funds for such nuclear refueling and complex overhaul effort are first obligated. (c) Condition for out-year contract payments Any contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2020 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for that later fiscal year. 129. Report on carrier wing composition (a) In general Not later than May 1, 2020, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the optimal composition of the carrier air wing in 2030 and 2040, including alternative force design concepts. (b) Elements The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements: (1) Analysis and justification for the Navy's stated goal of a 50/50 mix of 4th and 5th generation aircraft for 2030. (2) Analysis and justification for an optimal mix of carrier aircraft for 2040. (3) A plan for incorporating unmanned aerial vehicles and associated communication capabilities to effectively implement the future force design. (c) Briefing Not later than March 1, 2020, the Secretary of the Navy shall provide the congressional defense committees a briefing on the report required under subsection (a). D Air Force Programs 141. Requirement to align Air Force fighter force structure with National Defense Strategy and reports (a) Required submission of strategy Not later than March 1, 2020, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a fighter force structure acquisition strategy that is aligned with the results of the reports submitted under subtitle D of title I of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 (b) Alignment with strategy The Secretary of the Air Force may not deviate from the strategy submitted under subsection (a) until— (1) the Secretary receives a waiver and justification from the Secretary of Defense; and (2) 30 days after notifying the congressional defense committees of the proposed deviation. 142. Requirement to establish the use of an Agile DevOps software development solution as an alternative for Joint Strike Fighter Autonomic Logistics Information System (a) Establishment of an alternative Agile DevOps software development program The Secretary of Defense shall establish a software development activity using Agile DevOps to create an alternative solution for the Joint Strike Fighter Autonomic Logistics Information System (ALIS). (b) Competitive analysis The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a competitive analysis of the efforts between Autonomic Logistics Information System, Autonomic Logistics Information System–Next, and Madhatter, including with respect to transition opportunities and timelines. (c) Briefing Not later than September 30, 2020, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of the Air Force, shall provide the congressional defense committees a briefing on the findings of the Secretary of Defense with respect to the competitive analysis carried out under subsection (b). 143. Report on feasibility of multiyear contract for procurement of JASSM–ER missiles (a) In general Not later than March 31, 2020, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit a report to the congressional defense committees assessing the feasibility of entering into a multiyear contract for procurement of JASSM–ER missiles starting in fiscal year 2022. (b) Elements The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements: (1) An initial assessment of cost savings to the Air Force from a multiyear contract. (2) An analysis of at least two different multiyear contract options that vary in either duration or quantity, at least one of which assumes a maximum procurement of 550 missiles per year for 5 years. (3) An assessment of how a multiyear contract will impact the industrial base. (4) An assessment of how a multiyear contract will impact the Long Range Anti-Ship Missile. (5) An assessment of how a multiyear contract will impact the ability of the Air Force to develop additional capabilities for the JASSM–ER missile. 144. Air Force aggressor squadron modernization (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) it is critical that the Air Force has the capability to train against an advanced air adversary in order to be prepared for conflicts against a modern enemy force, and that in order to have this capability, the Air Force must have access to an advanced adversary force prior to United States adversaries fielding a 5th-generation operational capability; and (2) the Air Force’s plan to use low-rate initial production F–35As as aggressor aircraft reflects a recognition of the need to field a modernized aggressor fleet. (b) Report (1) In general The Secretary of the Air Force may not transfer any low-rate initial production F–35 aircraft for use as aggressor aircraft until the Chief of Staff of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees a comprehensive plan and report on the strategy for modernizing its organic aggressor fleet. (2) Elements The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: (A) Potential locations for F–35A aggressor aircraft, including an analysis of installations that— (i) have the size and availability of airspace necessary to meet flying operations requirements; (ii) have sufficient capacity and availability of range space; (iii) are capable of hosting advanced-threat training exercises; and (iv) meet or require minimal addition to the environmental requirements associated with the basing action. (B) An analysis of the potential cost and benefits of expanding aggressor squadrons currently operating 18 Primary Assigned Aircraft (PAA) to a level of 24 PAA each. (C) An analysis of the cost and timelines associated with modernizing the current Air Force aggressor squadrons to include upgrading aircraft radar, infrared search-and-track systems, radar warning receiver, tactical datalink, threat-representative jamming pods, and other upgrades necessary to provide a realistic advanced adversary threat. 145. Air Force plan for Combat Rescue Helicopter fielding (a) Sense of congress It is the sense of Congress that, given delays to Operational Loss Replacement (OLR) program fielding and the on-time fielding of Combat Rescue Helicopter (CRH), the Air National Guard should retain additional HH–60G helicopters at Air National Guard locations to meet their recommended primary aircraft authorized (PAA) per the Air Force’s June 2018 report on Air National Guard HH–60 requirements. (b) Report on fielding plan (1) In general Not later than 45 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on its fielding plan for the CRH program. (2) Elements The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: (A) A description of the differences in capabilities between the HH–60G, OLR, and CRH helicopters. (B) A description of the costs and risks associated with changing the CRH fielding plan to reduce or eliminate inventory shortfalls. (C) A description of the measures for accelerating the program available within the current contract. (D) A description of the operational risks and benefits associated with fielding the CRH to the active component first, including— (i) how the differing fielding plan may affect deployment schedules; (ii) what capabilities active-component units deploying with the CRH will have that reserve component units deploying with OLR will not; and (iii) an analysis of the potential costs and benefits that could result from accelerating CRH fielding to all units through additional funding in the future years defense program. (c) Report on training plan (1) In general Not later than 45 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the plan to sustain training for initial-entry reserve component HH–60G pilots once the active component of the Air Force has received all of its CRH helicopters. (2) Elements The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: (A) Projected reserve component aircrew initial HH–60G/OLR qualification training requirements, by year. (B) The number of legacy HH–60G/OLR helicopters required to continue providing initial HH–60G qualification training through the 150th Special Operations Wing at Kirtland Air Force Base. (C) The number of personnel required to continue providing initial HH–60G/OLR qualification training through the 150th Special Operations Wing at Kirtland Air Force Base. (D) The number of flying hours required per pilot to perform differences training (E) The projected effect of using local flying training hours at reserve component units on overall unit training readiness and ability to meet Ready Aircrew Program requirements. 146. Military type certification for AT–6 and A–29 light attack experimentation aircraft The Secretary of the Air Force shall conduct a military type certification for the AT–6 and A–29 light attack experimentation aircraft pursuant to the DoD Directive on Military Type Certificates, 5030.61. E Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters 151. Limitation on availability of funds for communications systems lacking certain resiliency features (a) In general Except as provided under subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 may be used for the procurement of a current or future Department of Defense communication program of record unless the communications equipment— (1) provides the ability to deny geolocation of a transmission that would allow enemy targeting of the force; (2) provides the ability to securely communicate classified information in a jamming environment of like-echelon forces; and (3) utilizes a waveform that is made available in the Department of Defense Waveform Information Repository. (b) Waiver The Secretary of a military department may waive the requirement under subsection (a) with respect to a communications system upon certifying to the congressional defense committees that the system will not require resiliency due to its expected use. 152. F–35 sustainment cost (a) Quarterly report The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall include in the quarterly report required under section 155 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (1) sustainment cost data related to the F–35 program, including a comparison in itemized format of the cost of legacy aircraft and the cost of the F–35 program, based on a standardized set of criteria; and (2) a progress report on the extent to which the goals developed pursuant to subsection (b) are being achieved. (b) Cost reduction plan (1) In general The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall develop a plan for achieving significant reductions in the cost to operate and maintain the F–35 aircraft. (2) Elements The plan required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: (A) Specific changes in the management of operation and support (O&S) cost to engender continuous process improvement. (B) Specific actions the Department will implement in the near term to reduce O&S cost. (C) Concrete timelines for implementing the specific actions and process changes. (3) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the baseline plan for achieving operation and support cost savings. 153. Economic order quantity contracting authority for F–35 Joint Strike Fighter program The Secretary of Defense is authorized to award multiyear contracts for the procurement of F–35 aircraft in economic order quantities for fiscal year 2021 (Lot 15) through fiscal year 2023 (Lot 17). 154. Repeal of tactical unmanned vehicle common data link requirement Section 141 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 ( Public Law 109–163 II Research, development, test, and evaluation A Authorization of appropriations 201. Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in the funding table in section 4201. B Program requirements, restrictions, and limitations 211. Development and acquisition strategy to procure secure, low probability of detection data link network capability (a) Strategy required Not later than March 1, 2020, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force and Chief of Naval Operations shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a joint development and acquisition strategy to procure a secure, low probability of detection data link network capability, with the ability to effectively operate in hostile jamming environments while preserving the low observability characteristics of the relevant platforms, including both existing and planned platforms. (b) Network characteristics The data link network capability to be procured pursuant to the development and acquisition strategy submitted under subsection (a) shall— (1) ensure that any network made with such capability will be low risk and affordable, with minimal impact or change to existing host platforms and minimal overall integration costs; (2) use a non-proprietary and open systems approach compatible with the Rapid Capabilities Office Open Mission Systems initiative of the Air Force and the Future Airborne Capability Environment initiative of the Navy; and (3) provide for an architecture to connect, with operationally relevant throughput and latency— (A) fifth-generation combat aircraft; (B) fifth-generation and fourth-generation combat aircraft; (C) fifth-generation and fourth-generation combat aircraft and appropriate support aircraft and other network nodes for command, control, communications, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance purposes; and (D) fifth-generation and fourth-generation combat aircraft and their associated network-enabled precision weapons. (c) Limitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for operation and maintenance for the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force and for operations and maintenance for the Office of the Secretary of the Navy, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date that is 15 days after the date on which the Chief of Staff of the Air Force and Chief of Naval Operations submit the development and acquisition strategy required by subsection (a). 212. Establishment of secure next-generation wireless network (5G) infrastructure for the Nevada Test and Training Range and base infrastructure (a) Establishment required Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish secure fifth-generation wireless network components and capabilities at no fewer than two Department of Defense installations in accordance with this section. (b) First installation (1) Location The Secretary shall establish components and capabilities under subsection (a) at the Nevada Test and Training Range, which shall serve as the Department’s Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB) for fifth-generation wireless networking. (2) Objective The Secretary shall ensure that the establishment of components and capabilities under subsection (a) at the range described in paragraph (1) of this subsection will allow the Department to explore and demonstrate the utility of using fifth-generation wireless networking technology to enhance combat operations. (3) Purpose The purpose of the establishment of components and capabilities under subsection (a) at the range described in paragraph (1) of this subsection is to demonstrate the following: (A) The potential military utility of high bandwidth, scalable, and low latency fifth-generation wireless networking technology. (B) Advanced security technology that is applicable to fifth-generation networks as well as legacy Department command and control networks. (C) Secure interoperability with fixed and wireless systems (legacy and future systems). (D) Enhancements such as spectrum and waveform diversity, frequency hopping and spreading, and beam forming for military requirements. (E) Technology for dynamic network slicing for specific use cases and applications requiring varying levels of latency, scale, and throughput. (F) Technology for dynamic spectrum sharing and network isolation. (c) Second and additional installations (1) Location The location of the second and any additional installations for establishment of components and capabilities under subsection (a) shall be at such Department installation or installations as the Secretary considers appropriate for the purpose set forth in paragraph (2) of this subsection. (2) Purposes The purpose of the second and any additional installations for establishment of components and capabilities under subsection (a) is to explore and demonstrate infrastructure implementations of the following: (A) Base infrastructure installation of high bandwidth, scalable, and low latency fifth-generation wireless networking technology. (B) Applications for secure fifth-generation wireless network capabilities for the Department, such as the following: (i) Interactive augmented reality or synthetic training environments. (ii) Internet of things devices. (iii) Autonomous systems. (iv) Advanced manufacturing through the following: (I) Department-sponsored centers for manufacturing innovation (as defined in section 34(c) of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act ( 15 U.S.C. 278s(c) (II) Department research and development organizations. (III) Manufacturers in the defense industrial base of the United States. 213. Limitation and report on Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2 enduring capability (a) Limitation and report None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Army may be obligated or expended for research, development, test, and evaluation for the Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2 enduring capability until the Secretary of the Army submits to the congressional defense committees a report on the Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2 program that contains the following: (1) An assessment of whether the requirements previously established for the program meet the anticipated threat at the time of planned initial operating capability and fully operating capability. (2) A list of candidate systems considered to meet the Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2 requirement, including those fielded or in development by the Army, the Missile Defense Agency, and other elements of the Department of Defense. (3) An assessment of each candidate system’s capability against representative threats. (4) An assessment of other relevant specifications of each candidate system, including cost of development, cost per round if applicable, technological maturity, and logistics and sustainment. (5) A plan for how the Army will integrate the chosen system or systems into the Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System. (b) Certification required Not later than 10 days after the date on which the President submits the annual budget request of the President for fiscal year 2021 pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army shall, without delegation, submit to the congressional defense committees a certification that identifies a program of record contained within that budget request that will meet the requirement in Department of Defense Directive 5100.01 to conduct air and missile defense to support joint campaigns as it applies to defense against supersonic cruise missiles. 214. Electromagnetic spectrum sharing research and development program (a) Program establishment The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Administrator of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, and the Federal Communications Commission shall jointly establish an electromagnetic spectrum sharing research and development program to promote the establishment of innovative technologies and techniques to facilitate electromagnetic spectrum sharing between fifth-generation wireless networking technologies, Federal systems, and other non-Federal incumbent systems. (b) Establishment of test beds (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in coordination with the Administrator and the Commission, shall, as part of the program established under subsection (a), establish at least two test beds to demonstrate the potential for cohabitation between fifth-generation wireless networking technologies, other incumbent non-Federal systems, and Federal systems. (2) Co-location of test beds The test beds established under paragraph (1) may be co-located, if a single geographic location can provide a sufficient diversity of Federal systems. If not, test beds established under this subsection shall coordinate to share results and best practices identified in each location. (c) Development of Department of Defense integrated spectrum automation enterprise strategy (1) In general Not later than May 1, 2020, the Secretary and the Administrator of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, in consultation with the Federal Communications Commission, shall jointly propose an integrated spectrum automation enterprise strategy for the Department of Defense to address management of electromagnetic spectrum, including both Federal and non-Federal spectrum that is shared by the Department of Defense or could be used for national security missions in the future, including on a shared basis. (2) Matters encompassed The strategy developed under subparagraph (A) shall encompass cloud-based databases, artificial intelligence, system certification processes, public facing application programming interfaces and online tools, and electromagnetic spectrum compatibility analyses for sharing of electromagnetic spectrum. (d) Periodic briefings Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and not less frequently than once every 180 days thereafter until the Secretary submits the report required by subsection (e), the Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator and the Commission, shall brief the appropriate committees of Congress on the progress of the test beds established under subsection (b). (e) Report (1) In general Not later than October 1, 2022, the Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator and the Commission, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the results of the test beds established under subsection (b). (2) Recommendations The report submitted under paragraph (1) shall include recommendations to facilitate sharing frameworks in the bands of electromagnetic spectrum that are the subject of the test beds. (f) Appropriate committees of Congress In this subsection, the term appropriate committees of Congress (1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives. 215. Sense of the Senate on the Advanced Battle Management System It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) the Senate supports the vision of the Air Force for the Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS) as a system of systems that can integrate air, space, and other systems to detect, track, target, and direct effects against threats in all domains; (2) such a capability will be essential to the ability of the Air Force to operate effectively as part, and in support, of the Joint Force, especially in the highly-contested operating environments established by near-peer competitors; (3) the Senate is concerned that the Air Force has not moved quickly enough over the past year to begin defining the requirements and maturing the technologies that will be essential for the Advanced Battle Management System, especially in light of the pending retirement of the Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS) aircraft that the Advanced Battle Management System is conceived, in part, to replace; (4) the Senate understands that the Air Force is moving deliberately to analyze alternative concepts for the Advanced Battle Management System and adopt an architectural approach to its design; (5) the Advanced Battle Management System, as a multidomain system of systems, must have a central command and control capability that can integrate these systems into a unified warfighting capability; (6) emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence and automated sensor fusion, should be built into the command and control capability for the Advanced Battle Management System from the start; (7) such technologies would improve the ability of the Advanced Battle Management System to support human operators with— (A) the rapid processing and fusion of multidomain sensor data; (B) the highly-automated identification, classification, tracking, and targeting of threats in all domains; (C) the creation of a real-time common operating picture from multidomain intelligence; and the ability to direct effects on the battlefield at machine-to-machine speeds from all of the systems comprising the Advanced Battle Management System; and (8) for an effort as ambitious and complex as the Advanced Battle Management System, the Senate encourages the Air Force to use existing acquisition authorities to begin a rapid prototyping effort to refine the requirements and software-intensive technologies that will be integral to the command and control capability of the Advanced Battle Management System. 216. Modification of proof of concept commercialization program (a) Making the program permanent (1) In general Section 1603 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 ( Public Law 113–66 10 U.S.C. 2359 (2) Conforming amendments Such section is further amended— (A) in the section heading, by striking Pilot (B) in subsection (a)— (i) by striking Pilot (ii) by striking Pilot (C) by striking pilot (b) Additional improvements Such section, as amended by subsection (a), is further amended— (1) in the section heading, by inserting of dual-use technology commercialization (2) in subsection (a)— (A) by inserting of Dual-Use Technology Program (B) by inserting with a focus on priority defense technology areas that attract public and private sector funding, as well as private sector investment capital, including from venture capital firms in the United States, in accordance (3) in subsection (c)(4)(A)(iv), by inserting , which may include access to venture capital award (4) by striking subsection (d); (5) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (d); (6) by striking subsection (f); and (7) by adding at the end the following new subsection (e): (e) Authorities In carrying out this section, the Secretary may use the following authorities: (1) Section 1599g of title 10 of the United States Code, relating to public-private talent exchanges. (2) Section 2368 of such title, relating to Centers for Science, Technology, and Engineering Partnerships. (3) Section 2374a of such title, relating to prizes for advanced technology achievements. (4) Section 2474 of such title, relating to Centers of Industrial and Technical Excellence. (5) Section 2521 of such title, relating to the Manufacturing Technology Program. (6) Section 225 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 10 U.S.C. 2359 (7) Section 1711 of such Act ( Public Law 115–91 10 U.S.C. 2505 (8) Section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 ( 15 U.S.C. 3710a . 217. Modification of Defense quantum information science and technology research and development program Section 234 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (1) in subsection (b)— (A) in paragraph (2)— (i) by inserting and international interagency (ii) by striking private sector private-sector and international (B) in paragraph (6), by inserting , workforce, including facilities (2) in subsection (c)— (A) in paragraph (2), by striking sciences; (A) the National Quantum Coordination Office; (B) the National Science and Technology Council Quantum Information Science Subcommittee; (C) other Federal agencies; (D) other elements and offices of the Department of Defense; and (E) appropriate private-sector organizations; ; (B) in paragraph (3), by striking and (C) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5); and (D) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following new paragraph (4): (4) develop, in coordination with appropriate Federal entities, a taxonomy for quantum science activities and requirements for relevant technology and standards; and ; and (3) in subsection (d)(2)(D), by inserting a roadmap and including 218. Technology and National Security Fellowship (a) Fellowship program (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, shall establish a civilian fellowship program designed to place eligible individuals within the Department of Defense and Congress to increase the number of national security professionals with science, technology, engineering, and mathematics credentials employed by the Department and Congress. (2) Designation The fellowship program established under paragraph (1) shall be known as the Technology and National Security Fellowship fellows program (3) Assignments Each individual selected for participation in the fellows program shall be assigned to a one year position within— (A) the Department of Defense; or (B) a congressional office with emphasis on Armed Forces and national security matters. (4) Pay and benefits Each individual assigned to a position under paragraph (3)— (A) shall be compensated at a rate of basic pay that is equivalent to the rate of basic pay payable for a position at level 10 of the General Schedule; and (B) shall be treated as an employee of the United States during the assignment. (b) Eligible individuals For purposes of this section, and subject to subsection (e), an eligible individual is any individual who— (1) is a citizen of the United States; and (2) either— (A) expects to be awarded an undergraduate or graduate degree that, as determined by the Secretary, focuses on science, technology, engineering, or mathematics course work not later than 180 days after the date on which the individual submits an application for participation in the fellows program; or (B) possesses an undergraduate or graduate degree that, as determined by the Secretary, focuses on science, technology, engineering, or mathematics course work that was awarded not earlier than one year before the date on which the individual submits an application for participation in the fellows program. (c) Application Each individual seeking to participate in the fellows program shall submit to the Secretary an application therefor at such time and in such manner as the Secretary shall specify. (d) Coordination In carrying out this section, the Secretary may consider working through the following entities: (1) The National Security Innovation Network. (2) Other Department of Defense or public and private sector organizations, as determined appropriate by the Secretary. (e) Modifications to fellows program The Secretary may modify the terms and procedures of the fellows program in order to better achieve the goals of the program and to support workforce needs of the Department of Defense. (f) Consultation The Secretary may consult with the heads of the agencies, components, and other elements of the Department of Defense, Members and committees of Congress, and such institutions of higher education and private entities engaged in work on national security and emerging technologies as the Secretary considers appropriate for purposes of the fellows program, including with respect to assignments in the fellows program. 219. Direct Air Capture and Blue Carbon Removal Technology Program (a) Program required (1) In general The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of Energy, and the heads of such other Federal agencies as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate, shall carry out a program on research, development, testing, evaluation, study, and demonstration of technologies related to blue carbon capture and direct air capture. (2) Program goals The goals of the program established under paragraph (1) are as follows: (A) To develop technologies that capture carbon dioxide from seawater and the air to turn such carbon dioxide into clean fuels to enhance fuel and energy security. (B) To develop and demonstrate technologies that capture carbon dioxide from seawater and the air to reuse such carbon dioxide to create products for military uses. (C) To develop direct air capture technologies for use— (i) at military installations or facilities of the Department of Defense; or (ii) in modes of transportation by the Navy or the Coast Guard. (3) Phases The program established under paragraph (1) shall be carried out in two phases as follows: (A) The first phase shall consist of research and development and shall be carried out as described in subsection (b). (B) The second phase shall consist of testing and evaluation and shall be carried out as described in subsection (c), if the Secretary determines that the results of the research and development phase justify implementing the testing and evaluation phase. (4) Designation The program established under paragraph (1) shall be known as the Direct Air Capture and Blue Carbon Removal Technology Program Program (b) Research and development phase (1) In general During the research and development phase of the Program, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct research and development in pursuit of the goals set forth in subsection (a)(2). (2) Direct air capture The research and development phase of the Program may include, with respect to direct air capture, a front end engineering and design study that includes an evaluation of direct air capture designs to produce fuel for use— (A) at military installations or facilities of the Department of Defense; or (B) in modes of transportation by the Navy or the Coast Guard. (3) Duration The Secretary shall carry out the research and development phase of the Program during a four-year period commencing not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (4) Grants authorized The Secretary may carry out the research and development phase of the Program through the award of grants to private persons and eligible laboratories. (5) Report required Not later than 180 days after the date of the completion of the research and development phase of the Program, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the research and development carried out under the Program. (6) Funding for fiscal year 2020 (A) The amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 by section 201 for research, development, test, and evaluation is hereby increased by $8,000,000, with the amount of the increase to be available for the research and development phase of the Program. (B) The amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 by section 301 for operation and maintenance is hereby decreased by $8,000,000, with the amount of the decrease to be taken from amounts available for printing. (7) Authorization of appropriations for future fiscal years There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out the research and development phase of the Program $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2023. (c) Testing and evaluation phase (1) In general During the testing and evaluation phase of the Program, the Secretary shall, in pursuit of the goals set forth in subsection (a)(2), conduct tests and evaluations of the technologies researched and developed during the research and development phase of the Program. (2) Direct air capture The testing and evaluation phase of the Program may include demonstration projects for direct air capture to produce fuels for use— (A) at military installations or facilities of the Department of Defense; or (B) in modes of transportation by the Navy or the Coast Guard. (3) Duration The Secretary shall carry out the testing and evaluation phase of the Program during the three-year period commencing on the date of the completion of the research and development phase described in subsection (b), except that the testing and evaluation phase of the Program with respect to direct air capture may commence at such time after a front end engineering and design study demonstrates to the Secretary that commencement of such phase is appropriate. (4) Grants authorized The Secretary may carry out the testing and evaluation phase of the Program through the award of grants to private persons and eligible laboratories. (5) Locations The Secretary shall carry out the testing and evaluation phase of the Program at military installations or facilities of the Department of Defense. (6) Report required Not later than September 30, 2026, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the findings of the Secretary with respect to the effectiveness of the technologies tested and evaluated under the Program. (7) Authorization of appropriations There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out the testing and evaluation phase of the Program $15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2026. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) The term blue carbon capture (2) (A) The term direct air capture (B) The term direct air capture (i) that is deliberately released from a naturally occurring subsurface spring; or (ii) using natural photosynthesis. (3) The term eligible laboratory (A) a National Laboratory (as defined in section 2 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 ( 42 U.S.C. 15801 (B) a laboratory of the Department of Defense. C Reports and other matters 231. National security emerging biotechnologies research and development program (a) Establishment The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a research and development program on applications of emerging biotechnologies for the national security purposes set forth in subsection (b). (b) National security purposes The national security purposes set forth in this subsection are as follows: (1) To ensure military understanding and relevancy of applications of emerging biotechnologies in meeting national security requirements. (2) To coordinate all research and development relating to emerging biotechnologies within the Department of Defense and to provide for interagency cooperation and collaboration on research and development relating to emerging biotechnologies between the Department and other departments and agencies of the United States and appropriate private sector entities that are involved in research and development relating to emerging biotechnologies. (3) To develop and manage a portfolio of fundamental and applied emerging biotechnologies research initiatives that is stable, consistent, and balanced across scientific disciplines. (4) To collect, synthesize, and disseminate critical information on research and development relating to emerging biotechnologies within the national security establishment. (5) To establish and support appropriate research, innovation, and the industrial base, including facilities and infrastructure, to support the needs of Department missions and scientific workforce relating to emerging biotechnologies. (6) To develop a technical basis to inform the intelligence community on the analysis needs of the Department with respect to emerging biotechnologies. (c) Administration In carrying out the program required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall act through the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, who shall supervise the planning, management, and coordination of the program. The Under Secretary, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments and the heads of participating Defense Agencies and other departments and agencies of the United States, shall— (1) prescribe a set of long-term challenges and a set of broad technical goals for the program; (2) develop a coordinated and integrated research and investment plan for meeting near-, mid-, and long-term challenges for achieving broad technical goals that build upon the Department’s investment in emerging biotechnologies research and development, commercial sector and global investments, and other United States Government investments in emerging biotechnologies fields; (3) not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, develop and continuously update guidance, including classification guidance for defense-related emerging biotechnologies activities, and policies for restricting access to research to minimize the effects of loss of intellectual property in basic and applied emerging biotechnologies and information considered sensitive to the leadership of the United States in the field of emerging biotechnologies; and (4) develop memoranda of agreement, joint funding agreements, and other cooperative arrangements necessary for meeting long-term challenges and achieving specific technical goals. (d) Report (1) In general Not later than December 31, 2020, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the program carried out under subsection (a). (2) Elements The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An assessment of the potential national security risks of emerging biotechnologies technologies. (B) An assessment of the efforts of foreign powers to use emerging biotechnologies for military applications and other purposes. (C) A description of the knowledge-base of the Department with respect to emerging biotechnologies, plans to defend against potential national security threats posed by emerging biotechnologies, and any plans of the Secretary to enhance such knowledge-base. (D) A plan that describes how the Secretary intends to use emerging biotechnologies for military applications and to meet other needs of the Department. (E) A description of activities undertaken consistent with this section, including funding for activities consistent with the section. (F) Such other matters as the Secretary considers appropriate. (3) Form The report submitted under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (e) Definition of emerging biotechnologies In this section, the term emerging biotechnologies (1) Engineered biology, which is the application of engineering design principles and practices to biological, genetic, molecular, and cellular systems to enable novel functions and capabilities. (2) Neurotechnology, which refers to central and peripheral nervous system interfaces that leverage structural, computational, and mathematical modeling to develop devices that decode neural activity (identify how it corresponds to a particular behavior or cognitive state, such as sensorimotor function, memory, or neuropsychiatric function) and use this information to deliver targeted interventions or therapies to facilitate performance. (3) Performance enhancement, namely technologies that augment human physiology at the cellular, molecular, and physiological levels giving the end user novel or enhanced physical and psychological capabilities. (4) Gene editing, including tools that facilitate deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequence deletion, replacement, or insertion into cellular or organismal genetic material, thereby modulating genetic function for applications that include treating and preventing disease, and improving function of biological systems. (5) Biomolecular sequencing and synthesis, namely the processes by which biomolecular components (such as deoxyribonucleic acid and ribonucleic acid) can be measured (sequencing) or generated (synthesis) for uses in engineering biology, biomanufacturing, and other medical and nonmedical applications. 232. Cyber science and technology activities roadmap and reports (a) Roadmap for science and technology activities to support development of cyber capabilities (1) Roadmap required The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, shall develop a roadmap for science and technology activities of the Department of Defense to support development of cyber capabilities to meet Department needs and missions. (2) Goal of consistency The Secretary shall develop the roadmap required by paragraph (1) to ensure consistency with appropriate Federal interagency, industry, and academic activities. (3) Scope The roadmap required by paragraph (1) shall— (A) cover the development of capabilities that will likely see operational use within the next 25 years or earlier; and (B) address cyber operations and cybersecurity. (4) Consultation The Secretary shall develop the roadmap required by paragraph (1) in consultation with the following: (A) The Chief Information Officer of the Department. (B) The secretaries and chiefs of the military departments. (C) The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation. (D) The Commander of the United States Cyber Command. (E) The Director of the National Security Agency. (F) The Director of the Defense Information Systems Agency. (G) The Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. (H) The Director of the Defense Digital Service. (5) Form The Secretary shall develop the roadmap required by paragraph (1) in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (6) Publication The Secretary shall make available to the public the unclassified form of the roadmap developed pursuant to paragraph (1). (b) Annual report on cyber science and technology activities (1) Annual reports required In fiscal years 2021, 2022, and 2023, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering submit to the Congressional Defense Committees a report on the science and technology activities within the Department of Defense relating to cyber matters during the previous fiscal year, the current fiscal year, and the following fiscal year. (2) Contents Each report submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include, for the period covered by the report, a description and listing of the science and technology activities of the Department relating to cyber matters, including the following: (A) Extramural science and technology activities. (B) Intramural science and technology activities. (C) Major and minor military construction activities. (D) Major prototyping and demonstration programs. (E) A list of agreements and activities transition capabilities to acquisition activities, including— (i) national security systems; (ii) business systems; and (iii) enterprise and network systems. (F) Efforts to enhance the national technical cybersecurity workforce, including specific programs to support education, training, internships, and hiring. (G) Efforts to perform cooperative activities with international partners. (H) Efforts under the Small Business Innovation Research and the Small Business Technology Transfer Program, including estimated amounts in the request for the following fiscal year. (I) Efforts to encourage partnerships between the Department of Defense and universities participating in the National Centers of Academic Excellence in Cyber Operations and Cyber Defense. (3) Timing Each report submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be submitted concurrently with the annual budget request of the President submitted pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code. (4) Form The report submitted under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 233. Requiring certain microelectronics products and services meet trusted supply chain and operational security standards (a) Purchases (1) In general To protect the United States from intellectual property theft and to ensure national security and public safety in the application of new generations of wireless network technology and microelectronics, beginning on January 1, 2022, the Secretary of Defense shall— (A) ensure that each critical microelectronics product and service that the Department of Defense purchases on or after such date meets the trusted supply chain and operational security standards established pursuant to subsection (b), except in a case in which the Department seeks to purchase a critical microelectronics product or service, but— (i) no such product or service is available for purchase that meets such standards; or (ii) no such product or service is available for purchase that— (I) meets such standards; and (II) is available at a price that the Secretary does not consider prohibitively expensive; and (B) to the maximum extent practicable, ensure that each microelectronics product and service, other than a critical microelectronics product and service, that is purchased by the Department of Defense on or after such date meets the trusted supply chain and operational security standards established pursuant to subsection (b). (2) Critical microelectronics products and services For purposes of this section, a critical microelectronics product or service is a microelectronics product, or a service based on such a product, that is designated by the Secretary as critical to meeting national security needs. (b) Trusted supply chain and operational security standards (1) Standards required Not later than January 1, 2021, the Secretary shall establish trusted supply chain and operational security standards for the purchase of microelectronics products and services by the Department. (2) Consultation required In developing standards under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consult with the following: (A) The Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Commerce, and the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. (B) Suppliers of microelectronics products and services from the United States and allies and partners of the United States. (C) Representatives of major United States industry sectors that rely on a trusted supply chain and the operational security of microelectronics products and services. (D) Representatives of the United States insurance industry. (3) Tiers of trust and security authorized In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary may establish tiers of trust and security within the supply chain and operational security standards for microelectronics products and services. (4) General applicability The standards established pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be, to the greatest extent practicable, generally applicable to the trusted supply chain and operational security needs and use cases of the United States Government and commercial industry, such that the standards could be widely adopted by government and commercial industry. (5) Annual review Not later than October 1 of each year, the Secretary shall review the standards established pursuant to paragraph (1) and issue updates or modifications as the Secretary considers necessary or appropriate. (c) Ensuring ability to sell commercially (1) In general The Secretary shall, to the greatest extent practicable, ensure that suppliers of microelectronics products for the Federal Government who meet the standards established under subsection (b) are able and incentivized to sell products commercially that are produced on the same production lines as the microelectronics products supplied to the Federal Government. (2) Effect of requirements and acquisitions The Secretary shall, to the greatest extent practicable, ensure that the requirements of the Department and the acquisition by the Department of microelectronics enable the success of a dual-use microelectronics industry. (d) Maintaining competition and innovation The Secretary shall take such actions as the Secretary considers necessary and appropriate, within the Secretary’s authorized activities to maintain the health of the defense industrial base, to ensure that— (1) providers of microelectronics products and services that meet the standards established under subsection (b) are exposed to competitive market pressures to achieve competitive pricing and sustained innovation; and (2) the industrial base of microelectronics products and services that meet the standards established under subsection (b) includes providers producing in or belonging to countries that are allies or partners of the United States. 234. Technical correction to Global Research Watch Program Section 2365 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsections (a) and (d)(2), by striking Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (2) in subsections (d)(3) and (e), by striking Assistant Secretary Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (3) in subsection (d), by striking Assistant Secretary Under Secretary 235. Additional technology areas for expedited access to technical talent Section 217(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 10 U.S.C. 2358 (1) by redesignating paragraph (27) as paragraph (29); and (2) by inserting after paragraph (26) the following new paragraph (27): (27) Rapid prototyping. (28) Infrastructure resilience. . 236. Sense of the Senate and periodic briefings on the security and availability of fifth-generation (5G) wireless network technology and production (a) Sense of the Senate It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) use of fifth-generation (5G) wireless networks and associated technology will be a foundation for future warfighting applications for the Department of Defense; (2) the commercial implementation of fifth-generation wireless networks will provide the high speed and capacity necessary for the Internet of Things, advanced manufacturing, autonomous machines, the application of artificial intelligence, and smart cities, and it is critical that the Department of Defense utilize these new capabilities; (3) protecting the innovation and technology that enables these revolutionary developments is essential for security of the Department of Defense mission, and will require improved security of the microelectronics supply chain and of the design and operation of networks based on fifth-generation wireless network technology; (4) securing fifth-generation wireless networks and associated technology is required due to the increased effects of military processes that will be enabled on fifth-generation wireless networks; (5) the Department of Defense can no longer rely on fabricationless business models in which microelectronics manufacturing is located in countries with vulnerable supply chains or adversarial nations known for predatory industrial espionage and posing a military threat to the United States or on small-scale manufacturing of trusted microelectronics in dedicated facilities; (6) the Department of Defense should leverage its large procurement budget, sophisticated understanding of the threats to microelectronics supply chains, as well as experience establishing requirements for the secure production of microelectronics and working with trusted foundries to create a secure, competitive, and innovative manufacturing base in cooperation with industry; and (7) the Secretary of Defense should act expeditiously to achieve the goals enumerated in this subsection using resources and authorities available to the Department, while encouraging interagency planning for a whole-of-government strategy. (b) Periodic briefings (1) In general Not later than March 15, 2020, and not less frequently than once every three months thereafter until March 15, 2022, the Secretary of Defense shall brief the congressional defense committees on how the Department of Defense— (A) is using secure fifth-generation wireless network technology; (B) is reshaping the Department's policy for producing and procuring secure microelectronics; and (C) working in the interagency and internationally to develop common policies and approaches. (2) Elements Each briefing under paragraph (1) shall contain information on— (A) efforts to ensure a secure supply chain for fifth-generation wireless network equipment and microelectronics; (B) the continued availability of electromagnetic spectrum for warfighting needs; (C) planned implementation of fifth-generation wireless network infrastructure in warfighting networks, base infrastructure, defense-related manufacturing, and logistics; (D) steps taken to work with allied and partner countries to protect critical networks and supply chains; and (E) such other topics as the Secretary considers relevant. 237. Transfer of Combating Terrorism Technical Support Office (a) Transfer required Not later than March 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall transfer responsibilities for the authority, direction, and control of the Combating Terrorism Technical Support Office from the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict to the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. (b) Report required (1) In general Not later than the date that is 30 days before the date of the transfer of responsibilities required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on such transfer. (2) Contents The report submitted under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An assessment of the relevance of the roles, responsibilities, and objectives of the Combating Terrorism Technical Support Office to supporting implementation of the National Defense Strategy and recommendations, if any, for changes to the roles, responsibilities, and objectives of the Combating Terrorism Technical Support Office for the purpose of supporting implementation of the National Defense Strategy. (B) An articulation of any anticipated efficiencies resulting from the transfer of responsibilities as described in subsection (a). (C) Such other matters as the Secretary considers relevant. 238. Briefing on cooperative defense technology programs and risks of technology transfer to China or Russia (a) Briefing required Not later than March 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, shall provide the congressional defense committees a briefing, and documents as appropriate, on current cooperative defense technology programs of the Department of Defense with any country the Secretary assesses to be engaged in significant defense or other advanced technology cooperation with the People’s Republic of China or the Russian Federation. (b) Matters to be addressed The briefing required by subsection (a) shall address the following matters: (1) Whether any current cooperative defense technology programs of the Department of Defense increase the risk of technology transfer to the People’s Republic of China or the Russian Federation. (2) What actions the Department of Defense has taken to mitigate the risk of technology transfer to the People’s Republic of China or the Russian Federation with respect to current cooperative defense technology programs. (3) Such recommendations as the Secretary may have for legislative or administrative action to prevent technology transfer to the People’s Republic of China or the Russian Federation with respect to cooperative defense technology programs, especially as it relates to capabilities the Secretary assesses to be critical to maintain or restore the comparative military advantage of the United States. (c) Notification required The Secretary shall provide the congressional committees a written notification not later than 15 days after any decision to suspend or terminate a cooperative defense technology program due to the risk or occurrence of technology transfer to the People’s Republic of China or the Russian Federation. 239. Modification of authority for prizes for advanced technology achievements Section 2374a(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, 240. Use of funds for Strategic Environmental Research Program, Environmental Security Technical Certification Program, and Operational Energy Capability Improvement Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in the funding table in section 4201 for the Strategic Environmental Research Program, Operational Energy Capability Improvement, and the Environmental Security Technical Certification Program, the Secretary of Defense shall expend amounts as follows: (1) Not less than $10,000,000 on the development and demonstration of long duration on-site energy battery storage for distributed energy assets. (2) Not less than $10,000,000 on the development, demonstration, and validation of non-fluorine based firefighting foams. (3) Not less than $10,000,000 on the development, demonstration, and validation of secure microgrids for both installations and forward operating bases. (4) Not less than $5,000,000 on the development, demonstration, and validation of technologies that can harvest potable water from air. 241. Funding for the Sea-Launched Cruise Missile–Nuclear analysis of alternatives (a) Availability of funding Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 by section 201 for research, development, test, and evaluation, at least $5,000,000 shall be available for the analysis of alternatives for the Sea-Launched Cruise Missile–Nuclear. (b) Program of record The Secretary of Defense shall make the Sea-Launched Cruise Missile–Nuclear a program of record. 242. Review and assessment pertaining to transition of Department of Defense-originated dual-use technology (a) In general The Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering shall— (1) conduct a review of the Department of Defense science and technology enterprise’s intellectual property and strategy for awarding exclusive commercial rights to industry partners; and (2) assess whether its practices are encouraging or constraining technology diffusion where desirable. (b) Elements The review and assessment required by subsection (a) shall include consideration of the following: (1) The retention or relinquishment by the Department of intellectual property rights and the effect thereof. (2) The granting by the Department of exclusive commercial rights and the effect thereof. (3) The potential of research prizes, vice payment and exclusive commercial rights, on contract as remuneration for science and technology activities. (4) The potential of science and technology programs with intellectual property strategies that do not include commercialization monopolies. (5) The potential of establishing price ceilings for licenses and commercial sale mandates to discourage selective commercial hoarding. (6) The activities of the Department in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act to promulgate to approved users in the commercial sector the intellectual property that the Department retains and their potential applications. (7) Such other major factors as may inhibit the diffusion of Department-funded technology in the commercial sector where desirable. (c) University partnership In carrying out subsection (a), the Under Secretary shall partner with a business school or law school of a university with resident economics and intellectual property expertise. (d) Report (1) In general Not later than May 1, 2020, the Under Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the findings of the Under Secretary with respect to the review and assessment required by subsection (a). (2) Recommendations The report required by paragraph (1) shall include such recommendations as the Under Secretary may have for legislative or administrative action to improve the diffusion of the intellectual property and technology of the science and technology enterprise of the Department. III Operation and Maintenance A Authorization of Appropriations 301. Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4301. B Energy and Environment 311. Use of operational energy cost savings of Department of Defense Section 2912 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking subsection (b) subsection (b) or (c), as the case may be, (2) in subsection (b), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking The Secretary of Defense Except as provided in subsection (c) with respect to operational energy cost savings, the Secretary of Defense (3) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and (4) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c): (c) Use of operational energy cost savings The amount that remains available for obligation under subsection (a) that relates to operational energy cost savings realized by the Department shall be used for the implementation of additional operational energy resilience, efficiencies, mission assurance, energy conservation, or energy security within the department, agency, or instrumentality that realized that savings. . 312. Use of proceeds from sales of electrical energy generated from geothermal resources Section 2916(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking Except as provided in paragraph (3), proceeds Proceeds (2) by striking paragraph (3). 313. Energy resilience programs and activities (a) Modification of annual energy management and resilience report Section 2925(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the subsection heading, by inserting and readiness mission assurance (2) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting The Secretary shall ensure that mission operators of critical facilities provide to personnel of military installations any information necessary for the completion of such report. by the Secretary. (3) in paragraph (4), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking megawatts electric and thermal loads (4) in paragraph (5), by striking megawatts electric and thermal loads (b) Funding for energy program offices (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries of the military departments shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report stating whether the program offices specified in paragraph (2) are funded— (A) at proper levels to ensure that the energy resilience requirements of the Department of Defense are met; and (B) at levels that are not less than in any previous fiscal year. (2) Program offices specified The program offices specified in this paragraph are the following: (A) The Power Reliability Enhancement Program of the Army. (B) The Office of Energy Initiatives of the Army. (C) The Office of Energy Assurance of the Air Force. (D) The Resilient Energy Program Office of the Navy. (3) Funding plan (A) In general The Secretaries of the military departments shall include in the report submitted under paragraph (1) a funding plan for the next five fiscal years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act to ensure that funding levels are, at a minimum, maintained during that period. (B) Elements The funding plan under subparagraph (A) shall include, for each fiscal year covered by the plan, an identification of the amounts to be used for the accomplishment of energy resilience goals and objectives. (c) Establishment of targets for water use The Secretary of Defense shall, where life-cycle cost-effective, improve water use efficiency and management by the Department of Defense, including storm water management, by— (1) installing water meters and collecting and using water balance data of buildings and facilities to improve water conservation and management; (2) reducing industrial, landscaping, and agricultural water consumption in gallons by two percent annually through fiscal year 2030 relative to a baseline of such consumption by the Department in fiscal year 2010; and (3) installing appropriate sustainable infrastructure features on installations of the Department to help with storm water and wastewater management. 314. Native American Indian lands environmental mitigation program (a) In general Chapter 160 2712. Native American lands environmental mitigation program (a) Establishment The Secretary of Defense may establish and carry out a program to mitigate the environmental effects of actions by the Department of Defense on Indian lands and culturally connected locations. (b) Program activities The activities that may be carried out under the program established under subsection (a) are the following: (1) Identification, investigation, and documentation of suspected environmental effects attributable to past actions by the Department of Defense. (2) Development of mitigation options for such environmental effects, including development of cost-to-complete estimates and a system for prioritizing mitigation actions. (3) Direct mitigation actions that the Secretary determines are necessary and appropriate to mitigate the adverse environmental effects of past actions by the Department. (4) Demolition and removal of unsafe buildings and structures used by, under the jurisdiction of, or formerly used by or under the jurisdiction of the Department. (5) Training, technical assistance, and administrative support to facilitate the meaningful participation of Indian tribes in mitigation actions under the program. (6) Development and execution of a policy governing consultation with Indian tribes that have been or may be affected by action by the Department, including training personnel of the Department to ensure compliance with the policy. (c) Cooperative agreements (1) In carrying out the program established under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may enter into a cooperative agreement with an Indian tribe or an instrumentality of tribal government. (2) Notwithstanding chapter 63 (3) A cooperative agreement under this section for the procurement of severable services may begin in one fiscal year and end in another fiscal year only if the total period of performance does not exceed two calendar years. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) The term Indian land (A) any land located within the boundaries and a part of an Indian reservation, pueblo, or rancheria; (B) any land that has been allotted to an individual Indian but has not been conveyed to such Indian with full power of alienation; (C) Alaska Native village and regional corporation lands; and (D) lands and waters upon which any Federally recognized Indian tribe has rights reserved by treaty, act of Congress, or action by the President. (2) The term Indian tribe (3) The term culturally connected location . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 160 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2711 the following new item: 2712. Native American lands environmental mitigation program. . 315. Reimbursement of Environmental Protection Agency for certain costs in connection with the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant, Minnesota (a) Transfer amount Notwithstanding section 2215 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense may transfer to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency— (1) in fiscal year 2020, not more than $890,790; and (2) in each of fiscal years 2021 through 2026, not more than $150,000. (b) Purpose of reimbursement The amount authorized to be transferred under subsection (a) is to reimburse the Environmental Protection Agency for costs the Agency has incurred and will incur relating to the response actions performed at the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant, Minnesota, through September 30, 2025. (c) Interagency agreement The reimbursement described in subsection (b) is intended to satisfy certain terms of the interagency agreement entered into by the Department of the Army and the Environmental Protection Agency for the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant that took effect in December 1987 and that provided for the recovery of expenses by the Agency from the Department of the Army. 316. Prohibition on use of perfluoroalkyl substances and polyfluoroalkyl substances for land-based applications of firefighting foam (a) Limitation After October 1, 2022, no funds of the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to procure firefighting foam that contains in excess of one part per billion of perfluoroalkyl substances and polyfluoroalkyl substances. (b) Prohibition on use and disposal of existing stocks Not later than October 1, 2023, the Secretary of Defense shall— (1) cease the use of firefighting foam containing in excess of one part per billion of perfluoroalkyl substances and polyfluoroalkyl substances; and (2) dispose of all existing stocks of such firefighting foam in accordance with the Solid Waste Disposal Act ( 42 U.S.C. 6901 (c) Exemption for shipboard use Subsections (a) and (b) shall not apply to firefighting foam for use solely onboard ocean-going vessels. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) Perfluoroalkyl substances The term perfluoroalkyl substances (2) Polyfluoroalkyl substances The term polyfluoroalkyl substances n 2n+1 8 17 2 2 317. Transfer authority for funding of study and assessment on health implications of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances contamination in drinking water by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Section 316(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 Public Law 115–232 2019 and 2020 2019, 2020, and 2021 318. Cooperative agreements with States to address contamination by perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (a) Cooperative agreements (1) In general Upon request from the Governor or chief executive of a State, the Secretary of Defense shall work expeditiously, pursuant to section 2701(d) of title 10, United States Code, to finalize a cooperative agreement, or amend an existing cooperative agreement to address testing, monitoring, removal, and remedial actions relating to the contamination or suspected contamination of drinking, surface, or ground water from PFAS originating from activities of the Department of Defense by providing the mechanism and funding for the expedited review and approval of documents of the Department related to PFAS investigations and remedial actions from an active or decommissioned military installation, including a facility of the National Guard. (2) Minimum standards A cooperative agreement finalized or amended under paragraph (1) shall meet or exceed the most stringent of the following standards for PFAS in any environmental media: (A) An enforceable State standard, in effect in that State, for drinking, surface, or ground water, as described in section 121(d)(2)(A)(ii) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 ( 42 U.S.C. 9621(d)(2)(A)(ii) (B) An enforceable Federal standard for drinking, surface, or ground water, as described in section 121(d)(2)(A)(i) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 ( 42 U.S.C. 9621(d)(2)(A)(i) (b) Report Beginning on February 1, 2020, if a cooperative agreement is not finalized or amended under subsection (a) within one year after the request from the Governor or chief executive under that subsection, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees and Members of Congress a report— (1) explaining why the agreement has not been finalized or amended, as the case may be; and (2) setting forth a projected timeline for finalizing or amending the agreement. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate committees and members of Congress The term appropriate committees and Members of Congress (A) the congressional defense committees; (B) the Senators who represent a State impacted by PFAS contamination described in subsection (a)(1); and (C) the Members of the House of Representatives who represent a district impacted by such contamination. (2) Fully fluorinated carbon atom The term fully fluorinated carbon atom (3) PFAS The term PFAS (4) State The term State 42 U.S.C. 9601 319. Modification of Department of Defense environmental restoration authorities to include Federal Government facilities used by National Guard (a) Definition of facility Section 2700(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking The terms (A) The terms (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (B) The term facility . (b) Inclusion of pollutants and contaminants in environmental response actions Section 2701(c) of such title is amended by inserting or pollutants or contaminants hazardous substances (c) Establishment of environmental restoration accounts Section 2703(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (6) An account to be known as the Environmental Restoration Account, Army National Guard (7) An account to be known as the Environmental Restoration Account, Air National Guard . 320. Budgeting of Department of Defense relating to extreme weather (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall include in the annual budget submission of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code— (1) a dedicated budget line item for adaptation to, and mitigation of, effects of extreme weather on military networks, systems, installations, facilities, and other assets and capabilities of the Department of Defense; and (2) an estimate of the anticipated adverse impacts to the readiness of the Department and the financial costs to the Department during the year covered by the budget of the loss of, or damage to, military networks, systems, installations, facilities, and other assets and capabilities of the Department, including loss of or obstructed access to training ranges, as a result extreme weather events. (b) Disaggregation of impacts and costs The estimate under subsection (a)(2) shall set forth the adverse readiness impacts and financial costs under that subsection by military department, Defense Agency, and other component or element of the Department. (c) Extreme weather defined In this section, the term extreme weather 321. Pilot program for availability of working-capital funds for increased combat capability through energy optimization (a) In general Notwithstanding section 2208 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense and the military departments may use a working capital fund established pursuant to that section for expenses directly related to conducting a pilot program for energy optimization initiatives described in subsection (b). (b) Energy optimization initiatives Energy optimization initiatives covered by the pilot program include the research, development, procurement, installation, and sustainment of technologies or weapons system platforms, and the manpower required to do so, that would improve the efficiency and maintainability, extend the useful life, lower maintenance costs, or provide performance enhancement of the weapon system platform or major end item. (c) Limitation on certain projects Funds may not be used pursuant to subsection (a) for— (1) any product improvement that significantly changes the performance envelope of an end item; or (2) any single component with an estimated total cost in excess of $10,000,000. (d) Limitation in fiscal year pending timely report If during any fiscal year the report required by paragraph (1) of subsection (e) is not submitted by the date specified in paragraph (2) of that subsection, funds may not be used pursuant to subsection (a) during the period— (1) beginning on the date specified in such paragraph (2); and (2) ending on the date of the submittal of the report. (e) Annual report (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall submit an annual report to the congressional defense committees on the use of the authority under subsection (a) during the preceding fiscal year. (2) Deadline for submittal The report required by paragraph (1) in a fiscal year shall be submitted not later than 60 days after the date of the submittal to Congress of the budget of the President for the succeeding fiscal year pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code. (3) Recommendation In the case of the report required to be submitted under paragraph (1) during fiscal year 2020, the report shall include the recommendation of the Secretary of Defense and the military departments regarding whether the authority under subsection (a) should be made permanent. (f) Sunset The authority under subsection (a) shall expire on October 1, 2024. 322. Report on efforts to reduce high energy intensity at military installations (a) Report (1) Report required Not later than September 1, 2020, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in conjunction with the assistant secretaries responsible for installations and environment for the military departments and the Defense Logistics Agency, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report detailing the efforts to achieve cost savings at military installations with high energy intensity. (2) Elements The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: (A) A comprehensive, installation-specific assessment of feasible and mission-appropriate energy initiatives supporting energy production and consumption at military installations with high energy intensity. (B) An assessment of current sources of energy in areas with high energy intensity and potential future sources that are technologically feasible, cost-effective, and mission-appropriate for military installations. (C) A comprehensive implementation strategy to include required investment for feasible energy efficiency options determined to be the most beneficial and cost-effective, where appropriate, and consistent with priorities of the Department of Defense. (D) An explanation on how the military departments are working collaboratively in order to leverage lessons learned on potential energy efficiency solutions. (E) An assessment of the extent to which activities administered under the Federal Energy Management Program of the Department of Energy could be used to assist with the implementation strategy under subparagraph (C). (F) An assessment of State and local partnership opportunities that could achieve efficiency and cost savings, and any legislative authorities required to carry out such partnerships or agreements. (3) Coordination with State, local, and other entities In preparing the report required under paragraph (1), the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment may work in conjunction and coordinate with the States containing areas of high energy intensity, local communities, and other Federal agencies. (b) Definition In this section, the term high energy intensity 323. Technical and grammatical corrections and repeal of obsolete provisions relating to energy (a) Technical and grammatical corrections (1) Technical corrections Title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) in section 2913(c), by striking government government or (B) in section 2926(d)(1), in the second sentence, by striking Defense Agencies the Defense Agencies (2) Grammatical corrections Such title is further amended— (A) in section 2922a(d), by striking resilience are prioritized and included energy resilience are included as critical factors (B) in section 2925(a)(3), by striking impacting energy degrading energy resilience at military installations (excluding planned outages for maintenance reasons), whether caused by on- or off-installation disruptions, including the total number of outages and their locations, the duration of each outage, the financial effect of each outage, whether or not the mission was affected, the downtimes (in minutes or hours) the mission can afford based on mission requirements and risk tolerances, the responsible authority managing the utility, and measures taken to mitigate the outage by the responsible authority. (b) Clarification of applicability of conflicting amendments made by 2018 Defense Authorization Act Section 2911(e) of such title is amended— (1) by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and inserting the following new paragraphs: (1) Opportunities to reduce the current rate of consumption of energy, the future demand for energy, and the requirement for the use of energy. (2) Opportunities to enhance energy resilience to ensure the Department of Defense has the ability to prepare for and recover from energy disruptions that affect mission assurance on military installations. ; and (2) by striking the second paragraph (13). (c) Conforming and clerical amendments (1) Heading amendment The heading of section 2926 of such title is amended to read as follows: 2926. Operational energy . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 173 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2926 and inserting the following new item: 2926. Operational energy. . C Logistics and Sustainment 331. Requirement for memoranda of understanding between the Air Force and the Navy regarding depot maintenance Before the Secretary of the Navy transfers any maintenance action on a platform to a depot under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Air Force or the Secretary of the Air Force transfers any maintenance action on a platform to a depot under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy, the Air Logistics Complex Commander and the Commander of Naval Air Systems Command shall enter into a joint memorandum of understanding that lists out responsibilities for work and technical oversight responsibilities for such maintenance. 332. Modification to limitation on length of overseas forward deployment of naval vessels Section 323 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c): (c) Extension of limitation on length of overseas forward deployment for U.S.S. Shiloh (CG– 67 Notwithstanding subsection (b), the Secretary of the Navy shall ensure that the U.S.S. Shiloh (CG–67) is assigned a homeport in the United States by not later than September 30, 2023. . D Reports 341. Report on modernization of Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex (a) Report required Not later than May 1, 2020, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the long-term modernization of the Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex (in this section referred to as the JPARC (b) Elements The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An assessment of the requirement for the JPARC to provide realistic training against modern adversaries, including 5th generation adversary aircraft and ground threats, and any current limitations compared to those requirements. (2) An assessment of the requirement for JPARC to provide a realistic anti-access area denial training environment and any current limitations compared to those requirements. (3) An assessment of the requirement to modernize the JPARC to provide realistic threats in a large-scale, combined-arms near-peer environment and any current limitations in meeting that requirement. The assessment should include— (A) target sets; (B) early warning and surveillance systems; (C) threat systems; (D) real-time communications capacity and security; (E) instrumentation and enabling mission data fusion capabilities; and (F) such other range deficiencies as the Secretary of the Air Force considers appropriate to identify. (4) A plan for balancing coalition training against training only for members of the Armed Forces of the United States at the JPARC. E Other Matters 351. Strategy to improve infrastructure of certain depots of the Department of Defense (a) Strategy required Not later than October 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a comprehensive strategy for improving the depot infrastructure of the military departments with the objective of ensuring that all covered depots have the capacity and capability to support the readiness and material availability goals of current and future weapon systems of the Department of Defense. (b) Elements The strategy under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A comprehensive review of the conditions and performance at each covered depot, including the following: (A) An assessment of the current status of the following elements: (i) Cost and schedule performance of the depot. (ii) Material availability of weapon systems supported at the depot and the impact of the performance of the depot on that availability. (iii) Work in progress and non-operational items awaiting depot maintenance. (iv) The condition of the depot. (v) The backlog of restoration and modernization projects at the depot. (vi) The condition of equipment at the depot. (B) An identification of analytically based goals relating to the elements identified in subparagraph (A). (2) A business-case analysis that assesses investment alternatives comparing cost, performance, risk, and readiness outcomes and recommends an optimal investment approach across the Department of Defense to ensure covered depots efficiently and effectively meet the readiness goals of the Department, including an assessment of the following alternatives: (A) The minimum investment necessary to meet investment requirements under section 2476 of title 10, United States Code. (B) The investment necessary to ensure the current inventory of facilities at covered depots can meet the mission-capable, readiness, and contingency goals of the Secretary of Defense. (C) The investment necessary to execute the depot infrastructure optimization plans of each military department. (D) Any other strategies for investment in covered depots, as identified by the Secretary. (3) A plan to improve conditions and performance of covered depots that identifies the following: (A) The approach of the Secretary of Defense for achieving the goals outlined in paragraph (1)(B). (B) The resources and investments required to implement the plan. (C) The activities and milestones required to implement the plan. (D) A results-oriented approach to assess— (i) the progress of each military department in achieving such goals; and (ii) the progress of the Department in implementing the plan. (E) Organizational roles and responsibilities for implementing the plan. (F) A process for conducting regular management review and coordination of the progress of each military department in implementing the plan and achieving such goals. (G) The extent to which the Secretary has addressed recommendations made by the Comptroller General of the United States relating to depot operations during the five-year period preceding the date of submittal of the strategy under this section. (H) Risks to implementing the plan and mitigation strategies to address those risks. (c) Annual report on progress As part of the annual budget submission of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the progress made in— (1) implementing the strategy under subsection (a); and (2) achieving the goals outlined in subsection (b)(1)(B). (d) Comptroller General reports (1) Assessment of strategy Not later than January 1, 2021, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the extent to which the strategy under subsection (a) meets the requirements of this section. (2) Assessment of implementation Not later than April 1, 2022, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth an assessment of the extent to which the strategy under subsection (a) has been effectively implemented by each military department and the Secretary of Defense. (e) Covered depot defined In this section, the term covered depot 352. Limitation on use of funds regarding the basing of KC–46A aircraft outside the continental United States (a) Report (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to Congress a report on the projected plan and timeline for strategic basing of the KC–46A aircraft outside the continental United States. (2) Elements In considering basing options in the report required by paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Air Force shall consider locations that— (A) support day-to-day air refueling operations, operations plans of the combatant commands, and flexibility for contingency operations, and have— (i) a strategic location that is essential to the defense of the United States and its interests; (ii) receivers for boom or probe-and-drogue combat training opportunities with joint and international partners; and (iii) sufficient airfield and airspace availability and capacity to meet requirements; and (B) possess facilities that— (i) take full advantage of existing infrastructure to provide— (I) runways, hangars, and aircrew and maintenance operations; and (II) sufficient fuel receipt, storage, and distribution for a five-day peacetime operating stock; and (ii) minimize overall construction and operational costs. (b) Limitation on use of funds Not more than 85 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Air Force for operation and maintenance for the Management Headquarters Program (Program Element 92398F) may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of the Air Force submits the report required by subsection (a) unless the Secretary of the Air Force certifies to Congress that the use of additional funds is mission essential. 353. Prevention of encroachment on military training routes and military operations areas Section 183a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (c)(6)— (A) by striking radar or airport surveillance radar operated radar, airport surveillance radar, or wide area surveillance over-the-horizon radar operated (B) by inserting Any setback for a project pursuant to the previous sentence shall not be more than what is determined to be necessary by a technical analysis conducted by the Lincoln Laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology or any successor entity. mitigation options. (2) in subsection (d)— (A) in paragraph (2)(E), by striking to a Deputy Secretary of Defense, an Under Secretary of Defense, or a Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense to the Deputy Secretary of Defense, an Under Secretary of Defense, or a Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (B) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and (C) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3): (3) The governor of a State may recommend to the Secretary of Defense additional geographical areas of concern within that State. Any such recommendation shall be submitted for notice and comment pursuant to paragraph (2)(C). ; (3) in subsection (e)(3), by striking an under secretary of defense, or a deputy under secretary of defense an Under Secretary of Defense, or a Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (4) in subsection (f), by striking from an applicant for a project filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to section 44718 of title 49 from an entity requesting a review by the Clearinghouse under this section (5) in subsection (h)— (A) by redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), (5), (6), and (7) as paragraphs (4), (5), (6), (7), and (9), respectively; (B) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3): (3) The term governor ; (C) in paragraph (7), as redesignated by subparagraph (A), by striking by the Federal Aviation Administration by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (D) by inserting after paragraph (7), as redesignated by subparagraph (A), the following new paragraph: (8) The term State . 354. Expansion and enhancement of authorities on transfer and adoption of military animals (a) Transfer and adoption generally Section 2583 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in the subsection heading, by inserting transfer or adoption (B) by striking adoption transfer or adoption (2) in subsection (b)— (A) in the subsection heading, by inserting transfer or adoption (B) in the first sentence, by striking adoption transfer or adoption (C) in the second sentence, striking adoptability transferability or adoptability (3) in subsection (c)(1)— (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)— (i) by inserting transfer or adoption (ii) by inserting , by recommended priority (B) in subparagraphs (A) and (B), by inserting adoption by (C) in subparagraph (B), by inserting or organizations persons (D) in subparagraph (C), by striking by transfer to (4) in subsection (e)— (A) in the subsection heading, by inserting or adopted transferred (B) in paragraphs (1) and (2), by striking transferred transferred or adopted (C) in paragraph (2), by striking transfer transfer or adoption (b) Veterinary screening and care for military working dogs to be retired Such section is further amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (f), (g), and (h) as subsections (g), (h), and (i), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f): (f) Veterinary screening and care for military working dogs To be retired (1) (A) If the Secretary of the military department concerned determines that a military working dog should be retired, such Secretary shall transport the dog to the Veterinary Treatment Facility at Lackland Air Force Base, Texas. (B) In the case of a contract working dog to be retired, transportation required by subparagraph (A) is satisfied by the transfer of the dog to the 341st Training Squadron at the end of the dog's service life as required by section 2410r of this title and assignment of the dog to the Veterinary Treatment Facility referred to in that subparagraph. (2) (A) The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each dog transported as described in paragraph (1) to the Veterinary Treatment Facility referred to in that paragraph is provided with a full veterinary screening, and necessary veterinary care (including surgery for any mental, dental, or stress-related illness), before transportation of the dog in accordance with subsection (g). (B) For purposes of this paragraph, stress-related illness includes illness in connection with post-traumatic stress, anxiety that manifests in a physical ailment, obsessive compulsive behavior, and any other stress-related ailment. (3) Transportation is not required under paragraph (1), and screening and care is not required under paragraph (2), for a military working dog located outside the United States if the Secretary of the military department concerned determines that transportation of the dog to the United States would not be in the best interests of the dog for medical reasons. . (c) Coordination of screening and care requirements with transportation requirements Subsection (g) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (b)(1) of this section, is amended to read as follows: (g) Transportation of retiring military working dogs Upon completion of veterinary screening and care for a military working dog to be retired pursuant to subsection (f), the Secretary of the military department concerned shall— (1) if the dog was at a location outside the United States immediately prior to transportation for such screening and care and a United States citizen or member of the armed forces living abroad agrees to adopt the dog, transport the dog to such location for adoption; or (2) for any other dog, transport the dog— (A) to the 341st Training Squadron; (B) to another location within the United States for transfer or adoption under this section. . (d) Preservation of policy on transfer of military working dogs to law enforcement agencies Subsection (h) of such section, as so redesignated, is amended in paragraph (3) by striking adoption of military working dogs transfer of military working dogs to law enforcement agencies before the end of the dogs’ useful working lives. (e) Clarification of horses treatable as military animals Subsection (i) of such section, as so redesignated, is amended by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraph (2): (2) An equid (horse, mule, or donkey) owned by the Department of Defense. . (f) Contract term for contract working dogs Section 2410r(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting , and shall contain a contract term, shall require (2) by inserting and assigned for veterinary screening and care in accordance with section 2583 of this title 341st Training Squadron (3) by striking section 2583 of this title such section 355. Limitation on contracting relating to Defense Personal Property Program (a) Contracting prohibition The Secretary of Defense may not enter into or award any single or multiple-award contract to a single-source or multiple-vendor commercial provider for the management of the Defense Personal Property Program during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on the date that is 60 days after the date on which the Comptroller General of the United States submits to the congressional defense committees a report on the administration of the Defense Personal Property Program, which was requested by the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate to be submitted to the congressional defense committees not later than February 15, 2020. (b) Review of proposals Nothing in this section shall be construed as preventing the Secretary of Defense from reviewing or evaluating any solicited or unsolicited proposals to improve the Defense Personal Property Program. 356. Prohibition on subjective upgrades by commanders of unit ratings in monthly readiness reporting on military units (a) In general The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall modify Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction (CJCSI) 3401.02B, on Force Readiness Reporting, to prohibit the commander of a military unit who is responsible for monthly reporting of the readiness of the unit under the instruction from making any upgrade of the overall rating of the unit (commonly referred to as the C-rating (b) Waiver (1) In general The modification required by subsection (a) shall authorize an officer in a general or flag officer grade in the chain of command of a commander described in that subsection to waive the prohibition described in that subsection in connection with readiness reporting on the unit concerned if the officer considers the waiver appropriate in the circumstances. (2) Reporting on waivers Each report on personnel and unit readiness submitted to Congress for a calendar year quarter pursuant to section 482 of title 10, United States Code, shall include information on each waiver, if any, issued pursuant to paragraph (1) during such calendar year quarter. 357. Extension of temporary installation reutilization authority for arsenals, depots, and plants Section 345(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 10 U.S.C. 2667 September 30, 2020 September 30, 2025 358. Clarification of food ingredient requirements for food or beverages provided by the Department of Defense (a) In general Before making any final rule, statement, or determination regarding the limitation or prohibition of any food or beverage ingredient in military food service, military medical foods, commissary food, or commissary food service, the Secretary of Defense shall publish in the Federal Register a notice of a preliminary rule, statement, or determination (in this section referred to as a proposed action (b) Matters To be included The Secretary shall include in any notice published under subsection (a) the following: (1) The date and contact information for the appropriate office at the Department of Defense. (2) A summary of the notice. (3) A date for comments to be submitted and specific methods for submitting comments. (4) A description of the substance of the proposed action. (5) Findings and a statement of reason supporting the proposed action. 359. Technical correction to deadline for transition to Defense Readiness Reporting System Strategic Section 358(c) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 October 1, 2019 October 1, 2020 IV Military Personnel Authorizations A Active Forces 401. End strengths for active forces The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty personnel as of September 30, 2020, as follows: (1) The Army, 480,000. (2) The Navy, 340,500. (3) The Marine Corps, 186,200. (4) The Air Force, 332,800. B Reserve Forces 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve (a) In general The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of September 30, 2020, as follows: (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 336,000. (2) The Army Reserve, 189,500. (3) The Navy Reserve, 59,000. (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 38,500. (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 107,700. (6) The Air Force Reserve, 70,100. (7) The Coast Guard Reserve, 7,000. (b) End strength reductions The end strengths prescribed by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component shall be proportionately reduced by— (1) the total authorized strength of units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component which are on active duty (other than for training) at the end of the fiscal year; and (2) the total number of individual members not in units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component who are on active duty (other than for training or for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their consent at the end of the fiscal year. (c) End strength increases Whenever units or individual members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such units and by the total number of such individual members. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the reserves Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of September 30, 2020, the following number of Reserves to be serving on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the case of members of the National Guard, for the purpose of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training the reserve components: (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 30,595. (2) The Army Reserve, 16,511. (3) The Navy Reserve, 10,155. (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 2,386. (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 22,637. (6) The Air Force Reserve, 4,431. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status) (a) In general The authorized number of military technicians (dual status) as of the last day of fiscal year 2020 for the reserve components of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding section 129 of title 10, United States Code) shall be the following: (1) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 22,294. (2) For the Army Reserve, 6,492. (3) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 13,569. (4) For the Air Force Reserve, 8,938. (b) Variance Notwithstanding section 115 of title 10, United States Code, the end strength prescribed by subsection (a) for a reserve component specified in that subsection may be increased— (1) by 3 percent, upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is in the national interest; and (2) by 2 percent, upon determination by the Secretary of the military department concerned that such action would enhance manning and readiness in essential units or in critical specialties or ratings. (c) Limitation Under no circumstances may a military technician (dual status) employed under the authority of this section be coerced by a State into accepting an offer of realignment or conversion to any other military status, including as a member of the Active, Guard, and Reserve program of a reserve component. If a military technician (dual status) declines to participate in such realignment or conversion, no further action will be taken against the individual or the individual's position. (d) Adjustment of authorized strength (1) In general If, at the end of fiscal year 2019, the Air National Guard of the United States does not meet its full-time support realignment goals for such fiscal year (as presented in the justification materials of the Department of Defense in support of the budget of the President for such fiscal year under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code), the authorized number of military technicians (dual status) of the Air National Guard of the United States under subsection (a)(3) shall be increased by the number equal to difference between— (A) 3,190, which is the number of military technicians (dual status) positions in the Air National Guard of the United States sought to be converted to the Active, Guard, and Reserve program of the Air National Guard during fiscal year 2019; and (B) the number of realigned positions achieved in the Air National Guard by the end of fiscal year 2019. (2) Limitation The increase under paragraph (1) in the authorized number of military technician (dual status) positions described in that paragraph may not exceed 2,292. (3) Decrease in authorized number of ANGUS Reserves on active duty in support of the reserves In the event of an adjustment to the authorized number military technicians (dual status) of the Air National Guard of the United States under this subsection, the number of members of the Air National Guard of the United States authorized by section 412(5) to be on active duty as of September 30, 2020, shall be decreased by the number equal to the number of such adjustment. (e) Certification Not later than January 1, 2020, the Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall certify to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives the number of positions realigned from a military technician (dual status) position to a position in the Active, Guard, and Reserve program of a reserve component in fiscal year 2019. (f) Definitions In subsections (c), (d), and (e): (1) The term realigned position (2) The term Active, Guard, and Reserve program 414. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support During fiscal year 2020, the maximum number of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving at any time on full-time operational support duty under section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, is the following: (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 17,000. (2) The Army Reserve, 13,000. (3) The Navy Reserve, 6,200. (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 3,000. (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 16,000. (6) The Air Force Reserve, 14,000. 415. Authorized strengths for Marine Corps Reserves on active duty (a) Officers Section 12011(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking that part of the table pertaining to the Marine Corps Reserve and inserting the following: “Marine Corps Reserve: 2,400 143 105 34 2,500 149 109 35 2,600 155 113 36 2,700 161 118 37 2,800 167 122 39 2,900 173 126 41 3,000 179 130 42”. (b) Senior enlisted members Section 12012(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking that part of the table pertaining to the Marine Corps Reserve and inserting the following: “Marine Corps Reserve: 2,400 106 24 2,500 112 25 2,600 116 26 2,700 121 27 2,800 125 28 2,900 130 29 3,000 134 30”. (c) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect on October 1, 2019, and shall apply with respect to fiscal years beginning on or after that date. C Authorization of Appropriations 421. Military personnel (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4401. (b) Construction of authorization The authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other authorization of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for such purpose for fiscal year 2020. V Military Personnel Policy A Officer Personnel Policy 501. Repeal of codified specification of authorized strengths of certain commissioned officers on active duty Effective as of October 1, 2020, the text of section 523 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: The total number of commissioned officers serving on active duty in the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps in each of the grades of major, lieutenant colonel, or colonel, or in the Navy in each of the grades of lieutenant commander, commander, or captain, at the end of any fiscal year shall be as specifically authorized by Act of Congress for such fiscal year. . 502. Maker of original appointments in a regular or reserve component of commissioned officers previously subject to original appointment in other type of component (a) Maker of regular appointments in transfer from reserve active-status list to active-duty list Section 531(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the Secretary concerned the Secretary of Defense (b) Maker of reserve appointments in transfer from active-duty list to reserve active-status list Subsection (b) of section 12203 of such title is amended by striking the Secretary concerned the Secretary of Defense (c) Treatment of regular appointment as constructive reserve appointment To facilitate transfer from active duty list to reserve active-status list Such section 12203 is further amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c): (c) For purposes of appointments under this section, an officer who receives an original appointment as a regular commissioned officer in a grade under section 531 of this title that is made on or after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 shall be deemed also to have received an original appointment as a reserve commissioned officer in such grade. . 503. Furnishing of adverse information on officers to promotion selection boards (a) Expansion of grades of officers for which information is furnished Section 615(a)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting (A) (3) (2) in subparagraph (A), as designated by paragraph (1), by striking a grade above colonel or, in the case of the Navy, captain, a grade specified in subparagraph (B) (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (B) A grade specified in this subparagraph is as follows: (i) In the case of a regular officer, a grade above captain or, in the case of the Navy, lieutenant. (ii) In the case of a reserve officer, a grade above lieutenant colonel or, in the case of the Navy, commander. . (b) Furnishing at every phase of consideration Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (C) The standards and procedures referred to in subparagraph (A) shall require the furnishing to the selection board, and to each individual member of the board, the information described in that paragraph with regard to an officer in a grade specified in subparagraph (B) at each stage or phase of the selection board, concurrent with the screening, rating, assessment, evaluation, discussion, or other consideration by the board or member of the official military personnel file of the officer, or of the officer. . (c) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to the proceedings of promotion selection boards convened under section 611(a) of title 10, United States Code, after that date. 504. Limitation on number of officers recommendable for promotion by promotion selection boards (a) In general Section 616 of title 10, United States Code is amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (d), (e), (f), and (g) as subsections (e), (f), (g), and (h), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d): (d) The number of officers recommended for promotion by a selection board convened under section 611(a) of this title may not exceed the number equal to 95 percent of the number of officers included in the promotion zone established under section 623 of this title for consideration by the board. . (b) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to consideration by promotion selection boards convened under section 611(a) of title 10, United States Code, of promotion zones that are established under section 623 of that title on or after that date. 505. Expansion of authority for continuation on active duty of officers in certain military specialties and career tracks Section 637a(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting separation or provided for the 506. Higher grade in retirement for officers following reopening of determination or certification of retired grade (a) Advice and consent of Senate required for higher grade Section 1370(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (6); and (2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph (5): (5) If the retired grade of an officer is proposed to be increased through the reopening of the determination or certification of officer's retired grade, the increase in the retired grade shall be made by the Secretary of Defense, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. . (b) Recalculation of retired pay Paragraph (6) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (a)(1), is amended— (1) by inserting or increased reduced (2) by inserting as a result of the reduction or increase any modification of the retired pay of the officer (3) by inserting or increase the reduction (4) by adding at the end the following new sentence: An officer whose retired grade is increased as described in the preceding sentence shall not be entitled to an increase in retired pay for any period before the effective date of the increase. (c) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply to an increase in the retired grade of an officer that occurs through a reopening of the determination or certification of the officer's retired grade of officer on or after that date, regardless of when the officer retired. 507. Availability on the Internet of certain information about officers serving in general or flag officer grades (a) Availability required (1) In general The Secretary of each military department shall make available on an Internet website of such department available to the public information specified in paragraph (2) on each officer in a general or flag officer grade under the jurisdiction of such Secretary, including any such officer on the reserve active-status list. (2) Information The information on an officer specified by this paragraph to be made available pursuant to paragraph (1) is the information as follows: (A) The officer's name. (B) The officer’s current grade, duty position, command or organization, and location of assignment. (C) A summary list of the officer’s past duty assignments while serving in a general or flag officer grade. (b) Additional public notice on certain officers Whenever an officer in a grade of O–7 or above is assigned to a new billet or reassigned from a current billet, the Secretary of the military department having jurisdiction of such officer shall make available on an Internet website of such department available to the public a notice of such assignment or reassignment. (c) Limitation on withholding of certain information or notice (1) Limitation The Secretary of a military department may not withhold the information or notice specified in subsections (a) and (b) from public availability pursuant to subsection (a), unless and until the Secretary notifies the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives in writing of the information or notice that will be so withheld, together with justification for withholding the information or notice from public availability. (2) Limited duration of withholding The Secretary concerned may withhold from the public under paragraph (1) information or notice on an officer only on the bases of individual risk to the officer or in the interest of national security, and may continue to withhold such information or notice only for so long as the basis for withholding remains in force. B Reserve Component Management 511. Repeal of requirement for review of certain Army Reserve officer unit vacancy promotions by commanders of associated active duty units Section 1113 of the Army National Guard Combat Readiness Reform Act of 1992 ( 10 U.S.C. 10105 C General Service Authorities 515. Modification of authorities on management of deployments of members of the Armed Forces and related unit operating and personnel tempo matters (a) Limitation on scope of delegations of approval of exceptions to deployment thresholds Paragraph (3) of subsection (a) of section 991 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking be delegated to— be delegated to a civilian officer of the Department of Defense appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. (b) Separate policies on dwell time for regular and reserve members Paragraph (4) of such subsection is amended— (1) by striking addresses the amount (1) The amount ; (2) in paragraph (1), as designated by paragraph (1) of this subsection, by inserting regular member (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) The amount of dwell time a reserve member of the armed forces remains at the member’s permanent duty station after completing a deployment of 30 days or more in length. . (c) Repeal of authority to prescribe alternative definition of deployment Subsection (b) of such section is amended by striking paragraph (4). 516. Repeal of requirement that parental leave be taken in one increment (a) In general Subsection (i) of section 701 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking paragraph (5); and (2) by redesignating paragraphs (6) through (10) as paragraphs (5) through (9), respectively. (b) Conforming amendments Subsection (j)(4) of such section is amended— (1) by striking paragraphs (6) through (10) paragraphs (5) through (9) (2) by striking paragraph (9)(B) paragraph (8)(B) 517. Digital engineering as a core competency of the Armed Forces (a) Policy (1) In general It shall be a policy of the Department of Defense to promote and maintain digital engineering as a core competency of the civilian and military workforces of the Department, which policy shall be achieved by— (A) the recruitment, development, and retention of civilian employees and members of the Armed Forces with aptitude, experience, proficient expertise, or a combination thereof in digital engineering in and to the Department; (B) at the discretion of the Secretaries of the military departments, the development and maintenance of civilian and military career tracks on digital engineering, and related digital competencies (including data science, machine learning, software engineering, software product management, and artificial intelligence product management) for civilian employees of the Department and members of the Armed Forces, including the development and maintenance of training, education, talent management, incentives, and promotion policies in support of members at all levels of such career tracks; and (C) the development and application of appropriate readiness standards and metrics to measure and report on the overall capability, capacity, use, and readiness of digital engineering civilian and military workforces to develop and deliver operational capabilities, leverage modern digital engineering technologies, develop advanced capabilities to support military missions, and employ modern business practices. (2) Digital engineering For purposes of this section, digital engineering is the discipline and set of skills involved in the creation, processing, transmission, integration, and storage of digital data. (b) Responsibility Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall appoint a civilian official of the Department of Defense, at a level no lower than Assistant Secretary of Defense, for the development and discharge of the policy set forth in subsection (a). The official so designated shall be known as the Chief Digital Engineering Recruitment and Management Officer of the Department of Defense Officer (c) Duties In developing and providing for the discharge of the policy set forth in subsection (a), the Officer shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the miliary departments, do the following: (1) Develop recruitment programs with various core initiatives, programs, activities, and mechanisms to identify and recruit civilians employees of the Department of Defense and members of the Armed Forces with demonstrated aptitude, interest, proficient expertise, or a combination thereof, in digital engineering particularly, and in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) generally, including initiatives, programs, activities, and mechanisms to target populations of individuals not typically aware of opportunities in the Armed Forces for a digital engineering career. (2) Develop and maintain education, training, doctrine, and professional development activities to support digital engineering skills of civilian employees of the Department and members of the Armed Forces. (3) Coordinate and synchronize digital force management activities throughout the Department, advise the Secretary of Defense on all matters pertaining to the health and readiness of digital forces, convene a Department-wide executive steering group, and submit to Congress an annual report on the readiness of digital forces and progress toward achieving the policy. (4) Create a Department-wide mechanism to track digital expertise in the workforce, develop and maintain organizational policies, strategies, and plans sufficient to build, maintain, and refresh internal capacity at scale, and report to the Secretary quarterly on the health and readiness of digital forces. (5) Assist the military departments in designing, developing, and executing programs and incentives to retain, track, and oversee digital expertise among civilian employees of the Department and members of the Armed Forces on active duty. (6) At the request of the Chief of Staff of an Armed Force, or the head of another component or element of the Department, undertake an executive search for key leadership positions in digital engineering in such Armed Force, component, or element, and develop and deploy agile hiring and competitive compensation processes to fill such positions. (7) Identify necessary changes in authorities, policies, resources, or a combination thereof to further the policy. (8) Develop a definition for digital engineering consistent with and aligned to Department needs and processes. (d) Plan Not later than June 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a plan to meet the requirements of this section. The plan shall set forth the following: (1) An identification of the Officer. (2) A timeline for full implementation of the requirements of this section. (3) A description of the career tracks authorized by this section for both the civilian and military workforces of the Department of Defense. (4) Recommendations for such legislative or administrative action as the Secretary considers appropriate in connection with implementation of such requirements. 518. Modification of notification on manning of afloat naval forces (a) Timing of notification Subsection (a) of section 525 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking not later than 15 days after any of the following conditions are met: not later than 30 days after the end of each fiscal year quarter, of each covered ship (if any) that, as of the last day of such fiscal year quarter, met either condition as follows: (2) in paragraphs (1) and (2), by striking is less was less (b) Definitions of manning fit and manning fill Subsection (d) of such section is amended in paragraphs (1) and (2) by striking the billets authorized the ship manpower document requirement. 519. Report on expansion of the Close Airman Support team approach of the Air Force to the other Armed Forces (a) Report required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries of the military departments shall jointly submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth an assessment of the Secretaries of the feasibility and advisability of expanding the Close Airman Support (CAS) team approach of the Air Force to the other Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of such Secretaries. (b) Close Airman Support team approach The Close Airman Support team approach of the Air Force referred to in subsection (a) is an approach by which personnel associated with an Air Force squadron, and led by a senior enlisted member of the squadron, take actions to improve relationships and communication among members of the squadron in order to promote positive social behaviors among such members as a squadron, including an embrace of proactive pursuit of needed assistance. (c) Scope of report If the Secretaries determine that expansion of the Close Airman Support team approach to the other Armed Forces is feasible and advisable, the report under subsection (a) shall include a description of the manner in which the approach will be carried out in the other Armed Forces, including the manner, if any, in which the approach will be modified in the other Armed Forces to take into account the unique circumstances of such Armed Forces. D Military Justice and Related Matters I Matters Relating to Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault Generally 521. Department of Defense-wide policy and military department-specific programs on reinvigoration of the prevention of sexual assault involving members of the Armed Forces (a) Policy required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop and issue a comprehensive policy for the Department to reinvigorate the prevention of sexual assault involving members of the Armed Forces. (b) Policy elements (1) In general The policy required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (A) Education and training for members of the Armed Forces on the prevention of sexual assault. (B) Elements for programs designed to encourage and promote healthy relationships among members of the Armed Forces. (C) Elements for programs designed to empower and enhance the role of non-commissioned officers in the prevention of sexual assault. (D) Elements for programs to foster social courage among members of the Armed Forces to encourage and promote intervention in situations in order to prevent sexual assault. (E) Processes and mechanisms designed to address behaviors among members of the Armed Forces that are included in the continuum of harm that frequently results in sexual assault. (F) Elements for programs designed to address alcohol abuse, including binge drinking, among members of the Armed Forces. (G) Such other elements, processes, mechanisms, and other matters as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate. (2) Continuum of harm resulting in sexual assault For purposes of paragraph (1)(E), the continuum of harm that frequently results in sexual assault includes hazing, sexual harassment, and related behaviors (including language choices, off-hand statements, jokes, and unconscious attitudes or biases) that create a permissive climate for sexual assault. (c) Programs required Not later than 180 days after the issuance of the policy required by subsection (a), each Secretary of a military department shall develop and implement for each Armed Force under the jurisdiction of such Secretary a program to reinvigorate the prevention of sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces. Each program shall include the elements, processes, mechanisms, and other matters developed by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to subsection (a) tailored to the requirements and circumstances of the Armed Force or Armed Forces concerned. 522. Enactment and expansion of policy on withholding of initial disposition authority for certain offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (a) Initial disposition authority (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (2), the proper authority for a determination of disposition of reported offenses with respect to any offense specified in subsection (b) shall be an officer in a grade not below the grade of O–6 in the chain of command of the subject who is authorized by chapter 47 of such title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) to convene special courts-martial. (2) Authority when subject and victim are in different chains of command If the victim of an offense specified in subsection (b) is in a different chain of command than the subject, the proper authority under paragraph (1), for any reported offenses in connection with misconduct of the victim arising out of the incident in which the offense is alleged to have occurred, shall be an officer described in that paragraph in the chain of command of the victim. (3) Construction Nothing in this subsection shall be construed— (A) to prohibit the preferral of charges by an authorized person under section 830(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code (article 30(a)(1) of the Uniform code of Military Justice), with respect to the offenses specified in subsection (b), and the forwarding of such charges as so preferred to the proper authority under paragraph (1) with a recommendation as disposition; or (B) to prohibit an officer in a grade below the grade of O–6 from advising an officer described in paragraph (1) who is making a determination described in that paragraph with respect to the disposition of the offenses involved. (b) Covered offenses An offense specified in this subsection is any offense as follows: (1) An offense under section 893 of title 10, United States Code (article 93 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), relating to cruelty and maltreatment, if the offense constitutes sexual harassment. (2) An offense under section 893a of title 10, United States Code (article 93a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), relating to prohibited activity with a military recruit or trainee by a person in a position of special trust. (3) An offense under section 918 of title 10, United States Code (article 118 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), relating to murder, if the offense is committed in connection with family abuse or other domestic violence. (4) An offense under section 919 of title 10, United States Code (article 119 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), relating to manslaughter, if the offense is committed in connection with family abuse or other domestic violence. (5) An offense under section 919a of title 10, United States Code (article 119a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), relating to death or injury of an unborn child, if the offense is committed in connection with family abuse or other domestic violence. (6) An offense under section 919b of title 10, United States Code (article 119b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), relating to child endangerment, if the offense is committed in connection with family abuse or other domestic violence. (7) An offense under section 920 of title 10, United States Code (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), relating to rape and sexual assault generally. (8) An offense under section 920b of title 10, United States Code (article 120b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), relating to rape and sexual assault of a child. (9) An offense under section 920c of title 10, United States Code (article 120c of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), relating to other sexual misconduct. (10) An offense under section 925 of title 10, United States Code (article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), relating to kidnapping, if the offense is committed in connection with family abuse or other domestic violence. (11) An offense under section 928 of title 10, United States Code (article 128 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), relating to aggravated assault, if the offense is committed in connection with family abuse or other domestic violence. (12) An offense under section 928a of title 10, United States Code (article 128a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), relating to maiming, if the offense is committed in connection with family abuse or other domestic violence. (13) An offense under section 928b of title 10, United States Code (article 128b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), relating to domestic violence. (14) An offense under section 930 of title 10, United States Code (article 130 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), relating to stalking, if the offense is committed in connection with family abuse or other domestic violence. (15) An offense under section 932 of title 10, United States Code (article 132 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), relating to retaliation. (16) An offense under section 934 of title 10, United States Code (article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), if the offense relates to child pornography. (17) An offense under section 934 of title 10, United States Code (article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), if the offense— (A) relates to animal abuse; and (B) is committed in connection with family abuse or other domestic violence, (18) An offense under section 934 of title 10, United States Code (article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), if the offense— (A) relates to negligent homicide; and (B) is committed in connection with family abuse or other domestic violence. (19) An attempt to commit an offense specified in a paragraph (1) through (18) as punishable under section 880 of title 10, United States Code (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). (c) Scope of disposition authority with respect to particular offenses The authority in subsection (a) of an officer to make a disposition determination described in that subsection with respect to any offense specified in subsection (b) extends to a determination of disposition with respect to any other offenses against the subject arising out of the incident in which the offense is alleged to have occurred. (d) Scope of disposition determinations Except for an offense specified in section 818(c) of title 10, United States Code (article 18(c) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), of which only general courts-martial have jurisdiction, the disposition determinations permissible in the exercise of the authority under this section with respect to charges and specifications are as follows: (1) No action. (2) Administrative action. (3) Imposition of non-judicial punishment. (4) Preferral of charges. (5) If such charges and specifications were preferred from a subordinate, dismissal of charges or referral to court-martial for trial. (6) Forwarding to a superior or subordinate authority for further disposition. (e) Review of certain disposition determinations (1) Initial review and recommendation If a disposition determination under this section with respect to an offense is for a disposition specified in paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection (d) and the legal advisor to the officer making the disposition determination has recommended a disposition specified in paragraph (4), (5), or (6) of that subsection, a Special Victim Prosecutor (SVP), Senior Trial Counsel (STC), or Regional Trial Counsel (RTC) not in the chain of command of the officer making the disposition determination shall— (A) review the disposition determination; and (B) recommend to the staff judge advocate in the chain of command whether to endorse or supersede the disposition determination. (2) SJA review and advice Upon completion of a review of a recommendation under paragraph (1)(B), the staff judge advocate concerned shall advise the next superior commander in the chain of command of the officer making the original disposition determination whether such disposition determination should be endorsed or superseded. (3) Final disposition determination After considering advice under paragraph (2) with respect to an original disposition determination, the superior commander concerned shall— (A) make a new disposition determination with respect to the offenses concerned; or (B) endorse the original disposition determination for appropriate further action. (f) Training (1) In general The training provided to commissioned officers of the Armed Forces in grades O–6 and above on the exercise of authority pursuant to this section for determinations of the disposition of an offense specified in subsection (b) shall include specific training on such matters in connection with sexual harassment, sexual assault, and family abuse and domestic violence as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate to make informed disposition determinations under such authority. (2) Construction Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to deprive a court-martial of jurisdiction based on the level or amount of training received by the disposition authority pursuant to this section. (g) Manual for Courts-Martial The President shall implement the requirement of this section into the Manual for Courts-Martial in accordance with section 836 of title 10, United States Code (article 36 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 523. Training for Sexual Assault Initial Disposition Authorities on exercise of disposition authority for sexual assault and collateral offenses (a) In general The training for Sexual Assault Initial Disposition Authorities (SAIDAs) on the exercise of disposition authority under chapter 47, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), with respect to cases for which disposition authority is withheld to such Authorities by the April 20, 2012, memorandum of the Secretary of Defense, or any successor memorandum, shall include comprehensive training on the exercise by such Authorities of such authority with respect to such cases in order to enhance the capabilities of such Authorities in the exercise of such authority and thereby promote confidence and trust in the military justice process with respect to such cases. (b) Memorandum of Secretary of Defense The April 20, 2012, memorandum of the Secretary of Defense referred to in subsection (a) is the memorandum of the Secretary of Defense entitled Withholding Initial Disposition Authority Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice in Certain Sexual Assault Cases 524. Expansion of responsibilities of commanders for victims of sexual assault committed by another member of the Armed Forces (a) Notification of victims of events in military justice process (1) Notification required Except as provided in paragraph (2), the commander of a member of the Armed Forces who is the victim of an alleged sexual assault committed by another member of the Armed Forces (whether or not such other member is in the command of such commander) shall provide notification to such victim of every key or other significant event in the military justice process in connection with the investigation, prosecution, and confinement of such other member for alleged sexual assault. (2) Election of victim not to receive A commander is not required by paragraph (1) to provide notifications to a victim as described in that paragraph if the victim elects not to be provided such notifications. (3) Documentation Each commander described in paragraph (1) shall create and maintain appropriate documentation on the following: (A) Any notification provided as described in paragraph (1). (B) Any election made pursuant to paragraph (2). (b) Documentation of victim's preference on jurisdiction in prosecution In the case of a member of the Armed Forces who is the victim of an alleged sexual assault committed by another member of the Armed Forces who is subject to prosecution for such alleged offense both by court-martial under chapter 47 (c) Regulations The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe in regulations the requirements applicable to each of the following: (1) Notifications under subsection (a)(1). (2) Elections under subsection (a)(2). (3) Documentation under subsection (a)(3). (4) Documentation under subsection (b). 525. Training for commanders in the Armed Forces on their role in all stages of military justice in connection with sexual assault (a) In general The training provided commanders in the Armed Forces shall include comprehensive training on the role of commanders in all stages of military justice in connection with sexual assaults by members of the Armed Forces. (b) Elements To be covered The training provided pursuant to subsection (a) shall include training on the following: (1) The role of commanders in each stage of the military justice process in connection with sexual assault committed by a member of the Armed Forces, including investigation and prosecution. (2) The role of commanders in assuring that victims in sexual assault described in paragraph (1) are informed of, and have the opportunity to obtain, assistance available for victims of sexual assault by law. (3) The role of commanders in assuring that victims in sexual assault described in paragraph (1) are afforded the due process rights and protections available to victims by law. (4) The role of commanders in preventing retaliation against victims, their family members, witnesses, first responders, and bystanders for their their complaints, statements, testimony, and status in connection with sexual assault described in paragraph (1), including the role of commanders in ensuring that subordinates in the command are aware of their responsibilities in preventing such retaliation. (5) The role of commanders in establishing and maintaining a healthy command climate in connection with reporting on sexual assault described in paragraph (1) and in the response of the commander, subordinates in the command, and other personnel in the command to such sexual assault, such reporting, and the military justice process in connection with such sexual assault. (6) Any other matters on the role of commanders in connection with sexual assault described in paragraph (1) that the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate for purposes of this section. (c) Incorporation of best practices (1) In general The training provided pursuant to subsection (a) shall incorporate best practices on all matters covered by the training. (2) Identification of best practices The Secretaries of the military departments shall, acting through the training and doctrine commands of the Armed Forces, undertake from time to time surveys and other reviews of the matters covered by the training provided pursuant to subsection (a) in order to identify and incorporate into such training the most current practicable best practices on such matters. (d) Uniformity The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the training provided pursuant to subsection (a) is, to the extent practicable, uniform across the Armed Forces. 526. Notice to victims of alleged sexual assault of pendency of further administrative action following a determination not to refer to trial by court-martial Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, upon a determination not to refer a case of alleged sexual assault for trial by court-martial under chapter 47 527. Safe to report policy applicable across the Armed Forces (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments and the Secretary of Homeland Security, prescribe in regulations a safe to report policy described in subsection (b) that applies with respect to all members of the Armed Forces (including members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces) and cadets and midshipmen at the military service academies. (b) Safe to report policy The safe to report policy described in this subsection is a policy under which a member of the Armed Forces who is the victim of an alleged sexual assault, but who may have committed minor collateral misconduct at or about the time of such alleged sexual assault, or whose minor collateral misconduct is discovered only as a result of the investigation into such alleged sexual assault, may report such alleged sexual assault to proper authorities without fear or receipt of discipline in connection with such minor collateral misconduct absent aggravating circumstances that increase the gravity of the minor collateral misconduct or its impact on good order and discipline. (c) Minor collateral misconduct For purposes of the safe to report policy, minor collateral misconduct shall include any of the following: (1) Improper use or possession of alcohol. (2) Consensual intimate behavior (including adultery) or fraternization. (3) Presence in an off-limits area. (4) Such other misconduct as the Secretary of Defense shall specify in the regulations under subsection (a). (d) Aggravating circumstances The regulations under subsection (a) shall specify aggravating circumstances that increase the gravity of minor collateral misconduct or its impact on good order and discipline for purposes of the safe to report policy. 528. Report on expansion of Air Force safe to report policy across the Armed Forces (a) Report Not late than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments and the Secretary of Homeland Security, submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth an assessment of the feasibility and advisability of expanding the applicability of the safe to report policy described in subsection (b) so that the policy applies across the Armed Forces. (b) Safe to report policy The safe to report policy described in this subsection is the policy, currently applicable in the Air Force alone, under which a member of the Armed Forces who is the victim of an alleged sexual assault committed by another member of the Armed Forces, but who may have committed minor collateral misconduct at or about the time of such alleged sexual assault, or whose minor collateral misconduct at or about such time is discovered only as a result of the investigation into such alleged sexual assault, may report such alleged sexual assault to proper authorities without fear or receipt of discipline in connection with such minor collateral misconduct. 529. Proposal for separate punitive article in the Uniform Code of Military Justice on sexual harassment Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Joint Service Committee on Military Justice shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth recommendations for legislative and administrative action required to establish a separate punitive article in chapter 47 530. Treatment of information in Catch a Serial Offender Program for certain purposes (a) Exclusion from FOIA Section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Freedom of Information Act (b) Preservation of Restricted Report The transmittal or receipt in connection with the Catch a Serial Offender Program of a report on a sexual assault that is treated as a restricted report shall not operate to terminate its treatment or status as a restricted report. 531. Report on preservation of recourse to restricted report on sexual assault for victims of sexual assault following certain victim or third-party communications (a) Report required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report making findings and recommendations on the feasibility and advisability of a policy for the Department of Defense that would permit a victim of a sexual assault, that is or may be investigated as a result of a communication described in subsection (b), which victim is a member of the Armed Forces or an adult dependent of a member of the Armed Forces, to have the reporting on the sexual assault be treated as a restricted report without regard to the party initiating or receiving such communication. (b) Communications A communication described in this subsection is a communication reporting a sexual assault as follows: (1) By the victim to a member of the Armed Forces, whether a commissioned officer or a noncommissioned officer, in the chain of command of the victim or the victim's military sponsor. (2) By the victim to military law enforcement personnel or personnel of a military criminal investigative organization (MCIO). (3) By any individual other than victim. (c) Scope of findings and recommendations The report required by subsection (a) may include recommendations for new provisions of statute or regulations, or modification of current statute or regulations, that may be required to put into effect the findings and recommendations described in subsection (a). (d) Consultation In preparing the report required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with the Defense Advisory Committee on Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault in the Armed Forces (DAC–IPAD) under section 546 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck 10 U.S.C. 1561 532. Authority for return of personal property to victims of sexual assault who file a Restricted Report before conclusion of related proceedings Section 586 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ( 10 U.S.C. 1561 (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (e); (2) in subsection (e), as so redesignated, in the subsection heading, by inserting in unrestricted reporting cases proceedings (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (f) Return of personal property in restricted reporting cases (1) The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe procedures under which a victim who files a restricted report on an incident of sexual assault may request, at any time, the return of any personal property of the victim obtained as part of the sexual assault forensic examination. (2) The procedures shall ensure that— (A) a request of a victim under paragraph (1) may be made on a confidential basis and without affecting the restricted nature of the restricted report; and (B) at the time of the filing of the restricted report, a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator or Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocate— (i) informs the victim that the victim may request the return of personal property as described in paragraph (1); and (ii) advises the victim that such a request for the return of personal property may negatively impact a subsequent case adjudication, if the victim later decides to convert the restricted report to an unrestricted report. (3) Except with respect to personal property returned to a victim under this subsection, nothing in this subsection shall affect the requirement to retain a sexual assault forensic examination (SAFE) kit for the period specified in subsection (c)(4)(A). . 533. Extension of Defense Advisory Committee on Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault in the Armed Forces Section 546(f)(1) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck 10 U.S.C. 1561 five ten 534. Defense Advisory Committee for the Prevention of Sexual Misconduct (a) Establishment required (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain within the Department of Defense an advisory committee to be known as the Defense Advisory Committee for the Prevention of Sexual Misconduct Advisory Committee (2) Deadline for establishment The Secretary shall establish the Advisory Committee not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (b) Membership (1) In general The Advisory Committee shall consist of not more than 20 members, appointed by the Secretary from among individuals who have an expertise appropriate for the work of the Advisory Committee, including at least one individual with each expertise as follows: (A) Expertise in the prevention of sexual assault and behaviors on the sexual assault continuum of harm. (B) Expertise in the prevention of suicide. (C) Expertise in the change of culture of large organizations. (D) Expertise in implementation science. (2) Background of individuals Individuals appointed to the Advisory Committee may include individuals with expertise in sexual assault prevention efforts of institutions of higher education, public health officials, and such other individuals as the Secretary considers appropriate. (3) Prohibition on membership of members of Armed Forces on active duty A member of the Armed Forces serving on active duty may not serve as a member of the Advisory Committee. (c) Duties (1) In general The Advisory Committee shall advise the Secretary on the following: (A) The prevention of sexual assault (including rape, forcible sodomy, other sexual assault, and other sexual misconduct (including behaviors on the sexual assault continuum of harm)) involving members of the Armed Forces. (B) The policies, programs, and practices of each military department, each Armed Force, and each military service academy for the prevention of sexual assault as described in subparagraph (A). (2) Basis for provision of advice For purposes of providing advice to the Secretary pursuant to this subsection, the Advisory Committee shall review, on an ongoing basis, the following: (A) Cases involving allegations of sexual assault described in paragraph (1). (B) Efforts of institutions of higher education to prevent sexual assault among students. (C) Any other information or matters that the Advisory Committee or the Secretary considers appropriate. (3) Coordination of efforts In addition to the reviews required by paragraph (2), for purposes of providing advice to the Secretary the Advisory Committee shall also consult and coordinate with the Defense Advisory Committee on Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault in the Armed Forces (DAC-IPAD) on matters of joint interest to the two Advisory Committees. (d) Annual report Not later than March 30 each year, the Advisory Committee shall submit to the Secretary and the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the activities of the Advisory Committee pursuant to this section during the preceding year. (e) Sexual assault continuum of harm In this section, the term sexual assault continuum of harm (1) inappropriate actions (such as sexist jokes), sexual harassment, gender discrimination, hazing, cyber bullying, or other behavior that contributes to a culture that is tolerant of, or increases risk for, sexual assault; and (2) maltreatment or ostracism of a victim for a report of sexual misconduct. 535. Independent reviews and assessments on race and ethnicity in the investigation, prosecution, and defense of sexual assault in the Armed Forces (a) Reviews and assessments by DAC-IPAD The independent committee established by the Secretary of Defense under section 546 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck Public Law 113–291 DAC-IPAD (1) A review and assessment, by fiscal year, of the race and ethnicity of members of the Armed Forces accused of a penetrative sexual assault offense or contact sexual assault offense in an unrestricted report made pursuant to Department of Defense Instruction 6495.02, including an unrestricted report involving a spouse or intimate partner, in all cases completed in each fiscal year assessed. (2) A review and assessment, by fiscal year, of the race and ethnicity of members of the Armed Forces against whom charges were preferred pursuant to Rule for Courts-Martial 307 for a penetrative sexual assault offense or contact sexual assault offense in all cases completed in each fiscal year assessed. (3) A review and assessment, by fiscal year, of the race and ethnicity of members of the Armed Forces who were convicted of a penetrative sexual assault offense or contact sexual assault offense in all cases completed in each fiscal year assessed. (b) Information from Federal agencies (1) In general Upon request by the chair of the committee, a department or agency of the Federal Government shall provide information that the committees considers necessary to conduct reviews and assessments required by subsection (a), including military criminal investigation files, charge sheets, records of trial, and personnel records. (2) Handling, storage, and return The committee shall handle and store all records received and reviewed under this section in accordance with applicable privacy laws and Department of Defense policy, and shall return all records so received in a timely manner. (c) Report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the committee shall submit to the Secretary of Defense, and to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, a report setting forth the results of the reviews and assessments required by subsection (a). The report shall include such recommendations for legislative or administrative action as the committee considers appropriate in light of such results. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) The term case (2) The term completed (3) The term contact sexual assault offense (4) The term penetrative sexual assault offense 536. Report on mechanisms to enhance the integration and synchronization of activities of Special Victim Investigation and Prosecution personnel with activities of military criminal investigative organizations Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth proposals for various mechanisms to enhance the integration and synchronization of activities of Special Victim Investigation and Prosecution (SVIP) personnel with activities of military criminal investigative organizations (MCIOs) in investigations in which both such personnel are or may be involved. If the proposed mechanisms require legislative or administration action for implementation, the report shall set forth such recommendations for such action as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate. 537. Comptroller General of the United States report on implementation by the Armed Forces of recent statutory requirements on sexual assault prevention and response in the military (a) Report required The Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report, in writing, on a study, conducted by the Comptroller General for purposes of the report, on the implementation by the Armed Forces of statutory requirements on sexual assault prevention and response in the military in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 ( Public Law 108–136 Public Law 115–232 (b) Elements The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A list and citation of each statutory requirement (whether codified or uncodified) on sexual assault prevention and response in the military in each national defense authorization Act specified in paragraph (1), including— (A) whether such statutory requirement is still in force; and (B) if such statutory requirement is no longer in force, the date of the repeal or expiration of such requirement. (2) For each statutory requirement listed pursuant to paragraph (1), the following: (A) An assessment of the extent to which such requirement was implemented, or is currently being implemented, as applicable, by each Armed Force to which such requirement applied or applies. (B) A description and assessment of the actions taken by each of the Department of Defense, the military department concerned, and the Armed Force concerned to assess and determine the effectiveness of actions taken pursuant to such requirement in meeting its intended objective. (3) Any other matters in connection with the statutory requirements specified in subsection (a), and the implementation of such requirements by the Armed Forces, that the Comptroller General considers appropriate. (c) Briefings Not later than May 1, 2020, the Comptroller General shall provide to the committees referred to in subsection (a) one or more briefings on the status of the study required by subsection (a), including any preliminary findings and recommendations of the Comptroller General as a result of the study as of the date of such briefing. II Special Victims' Counsel Matters 541. Legal assistance by Special Victims' Counsel for victims of alleged domestic violence offenses (a) Conditional expansion of eligibility to victims of alleged domestic violence offenses Subsection (a) of section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) Legal counsel designated as described in paragraph (1) may also provide legal assistance to any individual described in paragraph (2)(B) or (2)(C) who is the victim of an alleged domestic violence offense, and to any civilian individual not otherwise covered by paragraph (2)(C) who is the victim of an alleged sex-related offense or alleged domestic violence offense, if the Secretary of the military department concerned determines (on a case-by-case basis) that resources are available for the provision of such assistance to such individual without impairing the capacity to provide assistance under paragraph (1) to victims of alleged sex-related offenses described in paragraph (2). . (b) Definitions Subsection (g) of such section is amended to read as follows: (g) Definitions In this section: (1) The term alleged covered offense (A) An alleged sex-related offense. (B) An alleged domestic violence offense. (2) The term alleged sex-related offense (A) a violation of section 920, 920b, 920c, or 930 of this title (article 120, 120b, 120c, or 130 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice); or (B) an attempt to commit an offense specified in a subparagraph (A) as punishable under section 880 of this title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). (3) The term alleged domestic violence offense (A) a violation of section 928, 928b(1), 928b(5), or 930 of this title (article 128, 128b(1), 128b(5), or 130 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), when committed against a spouse, intimate partner, or immediate family member; (B) a violation of any other provision of subchapter X of chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), when committed against a spouse, intimate partner, or immediate family member, as specified by the Secretary concerned for purposes of eligibility for legal consultation and assistance by Special Victims' Counsel under the jurisdiction of such Secretary under this section; or (C) an attempt to commit an offense specified in a subparagraph (A) or (B) as punishable under section 880 of this title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). . (c) Conforming amendments Such section is further amended— (1) in subsections (b) and (f), by striking alleged sex-related offense alleged covered offense concerned (2) in subsection (f)— (A) by striking subsection (a)(2) paragraph (2) or (3) of subsection (a) (B) in paragraph (1), by striking an alleged sex-related offense an alleged covered offense (d) Clerical amendments (1) Heading amendment The heading of such section is amended to read as follows: 1044e. Special Victims' Counsel: victims of sex-related offenses; victims of domestic violence offenses . (2) Table of sections the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 53 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 1044e and inserting the following new item: 1044e. Special Victims' Counsel: victims of sex-related offenses; victims of domestic violence offenses. . 542. Other Special Victims' Counsel matters (a) Enhancement of legal consultation and assistance in connection with potential victim benefits Paragraph (8)(D) of subsection (b) of section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking and other , section 1408(h) of this title, and other (b) Expansion of legal assistance authorized to Include consultation and assistance for retaliation Subsection (b) of such section is amended further— (1) by redesignating paragraph (10) as paragraph (11); and (2) by inserting after paragraph (9) the following new paragraph (10): (10) Legal consultation and assistance in connection with an incident of retaliation, whether such incident occurs before, during, or after the conclusion of any criminal proceedings, including— (A) in understanding the rights and protections afforded to victims of retaliation; (B) in the filing of complaints; and (C) in any resulting military justice proceedings. . (c) Codification of duty to determine victim's preference for prosecution of alleged sex-related offense by court-martial or civilian court (1) In general Such section is further amended— (A) by redesignating subsections (d) through (h) as subsections (e) through (i), respectively; and (B) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d): (d) Duty to determine victim's preference for prosecution of an alleged sex-related offense by court-martial or civilian court (1) In providing legal consultation and representation to a victim under this section in connection with an alleged sex-related offense that occurs in the United States, a Special Victims' Counsel shall have the duty— (A) to solicit the victim's preference regarding whether the offense should be prosecuted by court-martial or in a civilian court with jurisdiction over the offense; and (B) to make the victim's preference, if offered, known to appropriate military prosecutors. (2) Any consultation by a Special Victims' Counsel pursuant to paragraph (1) shall occur in accordance with the process for such consultation established pursuant to section 534(b) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck 10 U.S.C. 1044e . (2) Conforming amendment Paragraph (11) of subsection (b) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (b)(1) of this section, is amended by striking subsection (h) subsection (i) (d) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (e) Report on expansion of eligibility for SVC services for victims of alleged domestic violence offenses and related matters (1) In general Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth a description and assessment of the manner in which the Department of Defense would implement amendments to section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, that would provide for the following: (A) An expansion of eligibility for Special Victims' Counsel services for victims of alleged domestic violence offenses. (B) An expansion of eligibility for Special Victim's Counsel services to any civilians who are the victim of an alleged sex-related offense or an alleged domestic violence offense, in cases in which the Secretary concerned waives the condition in section 1044(a)(7) of title 10, United States Code, for purposes of such eligibility. (2) Elements The report required by paragraph (1) shall include a comprehensive description of the additional personnel (including the specific number of additional billets), resources, and training required to implement the amendments described in that paragraph such that such amendments are fully implemented by not later than September 30, 2025. (3) Definitions In this subsection: (A) The term alleged sex-related offense (B) The term alleged domestic violence offense (i) a violation of section 928(b), 928b(1), 928b(5), or 930 of title 10, United States Code (article 128(b), 128b(1), 128b(5), or 130 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), when committed against a spouse, intimate partner, or immediate family member; (ii) a violation of any other provision of subchapter X of chapter 47 of such title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), when committed against a spouse, intimate partner, or immediate family member, if specified by any Secretary concerned for purposes of eligibility for legal consultation and assistance by Special Victims' Counsel under the amendments described in paragraph (1); and (iii) an attempt to commit an offense specified in clause (i) or (ii) as punishable under section 880 of such title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). (C) The term Secretary concerned 543. Availability of Special Victims' Counsel at military installations (a) Deadline for availability If a Special Victims' Counsel is not available at a military installation for access by a member of the Armed Forces who requests access to such a Counsel, such a Counsel shall be made available at such installation for access by such member by not later than 72 hours after such request. (b) Report on civilian support of SVCs Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, each Secretary of a military department shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth the assessment of such Secretary of the feasibility and advisability of establishing and maintaining for each Special Victims' Counsel under the jurisdiction of such Secretary one or more civilian positions for the purpose of— (1) providing support to such Special Victims' Counsel; and (2) ensuring continuity and the preservation of institutional knowledge in transitions between the service of individuals as such Special Victims' Counsel. 544. Training for Special Victims' Counsel on civilian criminal justice matters in the States of the military installations to which assigned (a) Training Upon the assignment of a Special Victims' Counsel (including a Victim Legal Counsel of the Navy) to a military installation in the United States, such Counsel shall be provided appropriate training on the law and policies of the State or States in which such military installation is located with respect to the criminal justice matters specified in subsection (b). (b) Criminal justice matters The criminal justice matters specified in this subsection, with respect to a State, are the following: (1) Victim rights. (2) Protective orders. (3) Prosecution of criminal offenses. (4) Sentencing for conviction of criminal offenses. III Boards for Correction of Military Records and Discharge Review Board Matters 546. Repeal of 15-year statute of limitations on motions or requests for review of discharge or dismissal from the Armed Forces (a) Repeal Section 1553(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the second sentence. (b) Effective date The amendment made by this section shall take effect on October 1, 2020. 547. Reduction in required number of members of discharge review boards Section 1553(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking five not fewer than three 548. Enhancement of personnel on boards for the correction of military records and discharge review boards (a) Boards for the correction of military records Section 1552 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (g), by inserting , or a social worker with training on mental health issues connected with post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury or other trauma, psychiatrist (2) in subsection (h)(2)(A), by inserting (including a social worker with training on mental health issues connected with post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury or other trauma) a civilian health care provider (b) Discharge review boards Section 1553 of such title is amended— (1) in subsection (d)(1), by inserting , or a social worker with training on mental health issues connected with post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury or other trauma, psychiatrist (2) in subsection (e), by inserting a social worker with training on mental health issues connected with post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury or other trauma, or psychiatrist, 549. Inclusion of intimate partner violence and spousal abuse among supporting rationales for certain claims for corrections of military records and discharge review (a) Correction of military records Section 1552(h)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking or military sexual trauma , sexual trauma, intimate partner violence, or spousal abuse (b) Discharge review Section 1553(d)(3)(B) of such title is amended by striking or military sexual trauma , sexual trauma, intimate partner violence, or spousal abuse 550. Advice and counsel of trauma experts in review by boards for correction of military records and discharge review boards of certain claims (a) Boards for correction of military records Section 1552(g) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting (1) (g) (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) If a board established under subsection (a)(1) is reviewing a claim described in subsection (h), the board shall seek advice and counsel in the review from a psychiatrist, psychologist, or social worker with training on mental health issues associated with post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury or other trauma as specified in the current edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders published by the American Psychiatric Association. (3) If a board established under subsection (a)(1) is reviewing a claim in which sexual trauma, intimate partner violence, or spousal abuse is claimed, the board shall seek advice and counsel in the review from an expert in trauma specific to sexual assault, intimate partner violence, or spousal abuse, as applicable. . (b) Discharge review boards Section 1553(d)(1) of such title is amended— (1) by inserting (A) (1) (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph; (B) In the case of a former member described in paragraph (3)(B) who claims that the former member's post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury as described in that paragraph in based in whole or in part on sexual trauma, intimate partner violence, or spousal abuse, a board established under this section to review the former member's discharge or dismissal shall seek advice and counsel in the review from a psychiatrist, psychologist, or social worker with training on mental health issues associated with post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury or other trauma as specified in the current edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders published by the American Psychiatric Association. . 551. Training of members of boards for correction of military records and discharge review boards on sexual trauma, intimate partner violence, spousal abuse, and related matters (a) Boards for correction of military records The curriculum of training for members of boards for the correction of military records under section 534(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( 10 U.S.C. 1552 (1) Sexual trauma. (2) Intimate partner violence. (3) Spousal abuse. (4) The various responses of individuals to trauma. (b) Discharge review boards (1) In general Each Secretary concerned shall develop and provide training for members of discharge review boards under section 1553 of title 10, United States Code, that are under the jurisdiction of such Secretary on each of the following: (A) Sexual trauma. (B) Intimate partner violence. (C) Spousal abuse. (D) The various responses of individuals to trauma. (2) Uniformity of training The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall jointly ensure that the training developed and provided pursuant to this subsection is, to the extent practicable, uniform. (3) Secretary concerned defined In this subsection, the term Secretary concerned 552. Limitations and requirements in connection with separations for members of the Armed Forces who suffer from mental health conditions in connection with a sex-related, intimate partner violence-related, or spousal-abuse offense (a) Confirmation of diagnosis of condition required before separation Before a member of the Armed Forces who was the victim of a sex-related offense, an intimate partner violence-related offense, or a spousal-abuse offense during service in the Armed Forces (whether or not such offense was committed by another member of the Armed Forces), and who has a mental health condition not amounting to a physical disability, is separated, discharged, or released from the Armed Forces based solely on such condition, the diagnosis of such condition must be— (1) corroborated by a competent mental health care professional at the peer level or a higher level of the health care professional making the diagnosis; and (2) endorsed by the Surgeon General of the military department concerned. (b) Narrative reason for separation if mental health condition present If the narrative reason for discharge, separation, or release from the Armed Forces of a member of the Armed Forces is a mental health condition that is not a disability, the appropriate narrative reason for the discharge, separation, or release shall be condition, not a disability, or Secretarial authority. (c) Definition In this section: (1) The term intimate partner violence-related offense (A) An offense under section 928 or 930 of title 10, United States Code (article 128 or 130 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). (B) An offense under State law for conduct identical or substantially similar to an offense described in subparagraph (A). (2) The term sex-related offense (A) An offense under section 920 or 920b of title 10, United States Code (article 120 or 120b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). (B) An offense under State law for conduct identical or substantially similar to an offense described in subparagraph (A). (3) The term spousal-abuse offense (A) An offense under section 928 of title 10, United States Code (article 128 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). (B) An offense under State law for conduct identical or substantially similar to an offense described in subparagraph (A). (d) Effective date This section shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to separations, discharges, and releases from the Armed Forces that occur on or after that effective date. 553. Liberal consideration of evidence in certain claims by boards for the correction of military records and discharge review boards (a) Boards for the correction of military records (1) In general Section 1552(h) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) by striking paragraph (1); (B) by striking (2) In the case of a claimant described in paragraph (1), a board A board (C) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively; (D) in paragraph (1), as redesignated by subparagraph (C), by inserting all evidence presented by the claimant, including lay evidence and information and review (E) by striking paragraph (2), as so redesignated, and inserting the following new paragraph (2): (2) if a claim alleges error or injustice in the claimant’s discharge or dismissal, or the characterization of such discharge or dismissal, review such claim with liberal consideration of all evidence and information submitted by, or pertaining to, the claimant. . (2) Effective date The amendments made by paragraph (1) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to claims submitted to boards for the correction of military records under section 1552 of title 10, United States Code, on or after that date. (b) Discharge review boards (1) In general Section 1553 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) in subsection (c)— (i) by inserting (1) (c) (ii) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) A board established under this section shall— (A) review all evidence and information provided by the former member, including lay evidence and information and medical evidence of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs or a civilian health care provider that is provided by the former member; and (B) review the claim with liberal consideration of all evidence and information submitted by, or pertaining to, the former member. ; and (B) in subsection (d), by striking paragraph (3). (2) Effective date The amendments made by paragraph (1) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to motions or requests for review submitted to discharge review boards under section 1553 of title 10, United States Code, on or after that date. IV Other Military Justice Matters 555. Expansion of pre-referral matters reviewable by military judges and military magistrates in the interest of efficiency in military justice (a) In general Subsection (a) of section 830a of title 10, United States Code (article 30a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and inserting the following new paragraphs: (1) The President shall prescribe regulations for matters relating to proceedings conducted before referral of charges and specifications to court-martial for trial, including the following: (A) Pre-referral investigative subpoenas. (B) Pre-referral warrants or orders for electronic communications. (C) Pre-referral matters referred by an appellate court. (D) Pre-referral matters under subsection (c) or (e) of section 806b of this title (article 6b). (E) Pre-referral matters relating to the following: (i) Pre-trial confinement of an accused. (ii) The mental capacity or responsibility of an accused. (iii) A request for an individual military counsel. (2) In addition to the matters specified in paragraph (1), the regulations prescribed under that paragraph shall— (A) set forth the matters that a military judge may rule upon in such proceedings; (B) include procedures for the review of such rulings; (C) include appropriate limitations to ensure that proceedings under this section extend only to matters that would be subject to consideration by a military judge in a general or special court-martial; (D) provide such limitations on the relief that may be ordered under this section as the President considers appropriate; and (E) provide for treatment of such other pre-referral matters as the President may prescribe. . (b) Conforming and clerical amendments (1) Heading amendment The heading of such section is amended to read as follows: 830a. Art 30a. Proceedings conducted before referral . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter VI of chapter 47 830a. 30a. Proceedings conducted before referral. . 556. Policies and procedures on registration at military installations of civilian protective orders applicable to members of the Armed Forces assigned to such installations and certain other individuals (a) Policies and procedures required Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, establish policies and procedures for the registration at military installations of any civilian protective orders described in subsection (b), including the duties and responsibilities of commanders of installations in the registration process. (b) Civilian protective orders A civilian protective order described in this subsection is any civilian protective order as follows: (1) A civilian protective order against a member of the Armed Forces assigned to the installation concerned. (2) A civilian protective order against a civilian employee employed at the installation concerned. (3) A civilian protective order against the civilian spouse or intimate partner of a member of the Armed Forces on active duty and assigned to the installation concerned, or of a civilian employee described in paragraph (2), which order provides for the protection of such member or employee. (c) Particular elements The policies and procedures required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A requirement for notice between and among the commander, military law enforcement elements, and military criminal investigative elements of an installation when a member of the Armed Forces assigned to such installation, a civilian employee employed at such installation, a civilian spouse or intimate partner of a member assigned to such installation, or a civilian spouse or intimate partner of a civilian employee employed at such installation becomes subject to a civilian protective order. (2) A statement of policy that failure to register a civilian protective order may not be a justification for the lack of enforcement of such order by military law enforcement and other applicable personnel who have knowledge of such order. (d) Letter As soon as practicable after establishing the policies and procedures required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a letter that includes the following: (1) A detailed description of the policies and procedures. (2) A certification by the Secretary that the policies and procedures have been implemented on each military installation. 557. Increase in number of digital forensic examiners for the military criminal investigative organizations (a) In general Each Secretary of a military department shall take appropriate actions to increase the number of digital forensic examiners in each military criminal investigative organization (MCIO) under the jurisdiction of such Secretary by not fewer than 10 from the authorized number of such examiners for such organization as of September 30, 2019. (b) Military criminal investigative organizations For purposes of this section, the military criminal investigative organizations are the following: (1) The Army Criminal Investigation Command. (2) The Naval Criminal Investigative Service. (3) The Air Force Office of Special Investigations. (4) The Marine Corps Criminal Investigation Division. (c) Funding Funds for additional digital forensic examiners as required by subsection (a) for fiscal year 2020, including for compensation, initial training, and equipment, shall be derived from amounts authorized to be appropriated for that fiscal year for the Armed Force concerned for operation and maintenance. 558. Survey of members of the Armed Forces on their experiences with military investigations and military justice (a) In general Chapter 23 section 481a 481b. Military investigation and justice experiences: survey of members of the armed forces (a) Surveys required (1) The Secretary of Defense shall conduct from time to time a survey on the experiences of members of the armed forces with military investigations and military justice in accordance with this section and guidance issued by the Secretary for purposes of this section. (2) The survey under this section shall be known as the Military Investigation and Justice Experience Survey (b) Matters covered by survey The guidance issued by the Secretary under this section on the survey shall include specification of the following: (1) The individuals to be surveyed, including any member of the armed forces serving on active duty who is a victim of an alleged sex-related offense and who made an unrestricted report of that offense. (2) The matters to be covered in the survey, including— (A) the experience of the individuals surveyed with the military criminal investigative organization that investigated the alleged offense, and with the Special Victims’ Counsel in the case of a member who was the victim of an alleged sex-related offense; and (B) if the individual’s report resulted in a charge or charges that were referred to a court-martial, the experience of the individual with the prosecutor and the court-martial in general. (3) The timing of the administration of the survey, including when the investigation or case is closed or otherwise complete. (c) Frequency of survey The survey required by this section shall be conducted at least once every four years, but not more frequently than once every two years. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) Alleged sex-related offense The term alleged sex-related offense (2) Unrestricted report The term unrestricted report (3) Restricted report The term restricted report . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 481a the following new item: 481b. Military investigation and justice experiences: survey of members of the armed forces. . 559. Public access to dockets, filings, and court records of courts-martial or other records of trial of the military justice system (a) In general Section 940a of title 10, United States Code (article 140a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended— (1) by striking The Secretary of Defense (a) In general (2) in subsection (a), as designated by paragraph (1)— (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting (including with respect to the Coast Guard) military justice system (B) in paragraph (4), by inserting public access to docket information (3) by adding at the end the following new subsections: (b) Inapplicability of Privacy Act Section 552a of title 5 shall not apply to records of trial produced or distributed within the military justice system or docket information, filings, and records made publicly accessible in accordance with the uniform standards and criteria for conduct established by the Secretary under subsection (a). (c) Protection of certain personally identifiable information Records of trial, docket information, filings, and other records made publicly accessible in accordance with the uniform standards and criteria for conduct established by the Secretary under subsection (a) shall restrict access to personally identifiable information of minors and victims of crime (including victims of sexual assault and domestic violence), as practicable to the extent such information is restricted in electronic filing systems of Federal and State courts. (d) Inapplicability to certain dockets and records Nothing in this section shall be construed to provide public access to docket information, filings, or records that are classified, subject to a judicial protective order, or ordered sealed. . (b) Existing standards and criteria The Secretary of Homeland Security shall apply to the Coast Guard the standards and criteria for conduct established by the Secretary of Defense under section 940a of title 10, United States Code (article 140a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act, until such time as the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, prescribes revised standards and criteria for conduct under such section that implement the amendments made by subsection (a) of this section. 560. Pilot programs on defense investigators in the military justice system (a) In general Each Secretary of a military department shall carry out a pilot program on defense investigators within the military justice system under the jurisdiction of such Secretary in order to do the following: (1) Determine whether the presence of defense investigators within such military justice system will— (A) make such military justice system more effective in determining the truth; and (B) make such military justice system more fair and efficient. (2) Otherwise assess the feasibility and advisability of defense investigators as an element of such military justice system. (b) Elements (1) Model of similar civilian criminal justice systems Defense investigators under each pilot program under subsection (a) shall consist of personnel, and participate in the military justice system concerned, in a manner similar to that of defense investigators in civilian criminal justice systems that are similar to the military justice systems of the military departments. (2) Interview of victim A defense investigator may question a victim under a pilot program only upon a request made through the Special Victims' Counsel or other counsel of the victim, or trial counsel if the victim does not have such counsel. (3) Uniformity across military justice systems The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the personnel and activities of defense investigators under the pilot programs are, to the extent practicable, uniform across the military justice systems of the military departments. (c) Report (1) In general Not later than three years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the pilot programs under subsection (a). (2) Elements The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A description of each pilot program, including the personnel and activities of defense investigators under such pilot program. (B) An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of establishing and maintaining defense investigators as an element of the military justice systems of the military departments. (C) If the assessment under subparagraph (B) is that the establishment and maintenance of defense investigators as an element of the military justice systems of the military departments is feasible and advisable, such recommendations for legislative and administrative action as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate to establish and maintain defense investigators as an element of the military justice systems. (D) Any other matters the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate. 561. Report on military justice system involving alternative authority for determining whether to prefer or refer changes for felony offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (a) Report required (1) In general Not later than 300 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth the results of a study, conducted for purposes of the report, on the feasibility and advisability of an alternative military justice system in which determinations as to whether to prefer or refer charges for trial by court-martial for any offense specified in paragraph (2) is made by a judge advocate in grade O–6 or higher who has significant experience in criminal litigation and is outside of the chain of command of the member subject to the charges rather than by a commanding officer of the member who is in the chain of command of the member. (2) Specified offense An offense specified in this paragraph is any offense under chapter 47 (b) Elements The study required for purposes of the report under subsection (a) shall address the following: (1) Relevant procedural, legal, and policy implications and considerations of the alternative military justice system described in subsection (a). (2) An analysis of the following in connection with the implementation and maintenance of the alternative military justice system: (A) Legal personnel requirements. (B) Changes in force structure. (C) Amendments to law. (D) Impacts on the timeliness and efficiency of legal processes and court-martial adjudications. (E) Potential legal challenges to the system. (F) Potential changes in prosecution and conviction rates. (G) Potential impacts on the preservation of good order and discipline, including the ability of a commander to carry out nonjudicial punishment and other administrative actions. (H) Such other considerations as the Secretary considers appropriate. (3) A comparative analysis of the military justice systems of relevant foreign allies with the current military justice system of the United States and the alternative military justice system, including whether or not approaches of the military justice systems of such allies to determinations described in subsection (a) are appropriate for the military justice system of the United States. (4) An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of conducting a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of the alternative military justice system, and, if the pilot program is determined to be feasible and advisable— (A) an analysis of potential legal issues in connection with the pilot program, including potential issues for appeals; and (B) recommendations on the following: (i) The populations to be subject to the pilot program. (ii) The duration of the pilot program. (iii) Metrics to measure the effectiveness of the pilot program. (iv) The resources to be used to conduct the pilot program. 562. Report on standardization among the military departments in collection and presentation of information on matters within the military justice system Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth the following: (1) A plan for actions to provide for standardization, to the extent practicable, among the military departments in the collection and presentation of information on matters within their military justice systems, including information collected and maintained for purposes of section 940a of title 10, United States Code (article 140a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), and such other information as the Secretary considers appropriate. (2) An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of establishing and maintaining a single, Department of Defense-wide data management system for the standardized collection and presentation of information described in paragraph (1). 563. Report on establishment of guardian ad litem program for certain military dependents who are a victim or witness of offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice involving abuse or exploitation (a) Report required (1) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth an assessment of the feasibility and advisability of establishing a guardian ad litem program for military dependents described in paragraph (2) who are a victim or witness of an offense under chapter 47 (2) Covered dependents The military dependents described in this paragraph are as follows: (A) Military dependents under 12 years of age. (B) Military dependents who lack mental or other capacity. (b) Elements The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of establishing a guardian ad litem program as described in subsection (a). (2) If establishment of the guardian ad litem program is considered feasible and advisable, the following: (A) A description of administrative requirements in connection with the program, including the following: (i) Any memoranda of understanding between the Department of Defense and State and local authorities required for purposes of the program. (ii) The personnel, funding, and other resources required for purposes of the program. (B) Best practices for the program (as determined in consultation with appropriate civilian experts on child advocacy). (C) Such recommendations for legislative and administration action to implement the program as the Secretary considers appropriate. E Member Education, Training, Transition, and Resilience 566. Consecutive service of service obligation in connection with payment of tuition for off-duty training or education for commissioned officers of the Armed Forces with any other service obligations (a) In general Section 2007(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) Any active duty service obligation of a commissioned officer under this subsection shall be served consecutively with any other service obligation of the officer (whether active duty or otherwise) under any other provision of law. . (b) Effective date The amendment made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to agreements for the payment of tuition for off-duty training or education that are entered into on or after that date. 567. Authority for detail of certain enlisted members of the Armed Forces as students at law schools (a) In general Section 2004 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) by inserting and enlisted members commissioned officers (B) by striking bachelor of laws or (C) by inserting and enlisted members twenty-five officers (2) in subsection (b)— (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting or enlisted member officer (B) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following new paragraph (1): (1) either— (A) have served on active duty for a period of not less than two years nor more than six years and be an officer in the pay grade O–3 or below as of the time the training is to begin; or (B) have served on active duty for a period of not less than four years nor more than eight years and be an enlisted member in the pay grade E–5, E–6, or E–7 as of the time the training is to begin; ; (C) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); (D) by inserting after paragraph (1), as amended by subparagraph (B), the following new paragraph (2): (2) in the case of an enlisted member, meet all requirements for acceptance of a commission as a commissioned officer in the armed forces; and ; and (E) in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3), as redesignated by subparagraph (C) of this paragraph, by striking or law specialist (3) in subsection (c)— (A) in the first sentence, by inserting and enlisted members Officers (B) in the second sentence, by inserting or enlisted member officer (4) in subsection (d), by inserting and enlistment members officers (5) in subsection (e), by inserting or enlistment member officer (6) in subsection (f), by inserting or enlisted member officer (b) Conforming and clerical amendments (1) Heading amendment The heading of such section is amended to read as follows: 2004. Detail as students at law schools; commissioned officers; certain enlisted members . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 101 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2004 and inserting the following new item: 2004. Detail as students at law schools; commissioned officers; certain enlisted members. . 568. Connections of members retiring or separating from the Armed Forces with community-based organizations and related entities (a) In general The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly seek to enter into memoranda of understanding (MOUs) or other agreements with State veterans agencies under which information from Department of Defense Form DD–2648 on individuals undergoing retirement, discharge, or release from the Armed Forces is transmitted to one or more State veterans agencies, as elected by such individuals, to provide or connect veterans to benefits or services as follows: (1) Assistance in preparation of resumes. (2) Training for employment interviews. (3) Employment recruitment training. (4) Other services leading directly to a successful transition from military life to civilian life. (5) Healthcare, including care for mental health. (6) Transportation or transportation-related services. (7) Housing. (8) Such other benefits or services as the Secretaries jointly consider appropriate for purposes of this section. (b) Information transmitted The information transmitted on individuals as described in subsection (a) shall be such information on Form DD–2648 as the Secretaries jointly consider appropriate to facilitate community-based organizations and related entities in providing or connecting such individuals to benefits and services as described in subsection (a). (c) Modification of Form DD–2648 The Secretary of Defense shall make such modifications to Form DD–2648 as the Secretary considers appropriate to allow an individual filling out the form to indicate an email address at which the individual may be contacted to receive or be connected to benefits or services described in subsection (a). (d) Voluntary participation Information on an individual may be transmitted to and through a State veterans agency as described in subsection (a) only with the consent of the individual. In giving such consent, an individual shall specify the following: (1) The State veterans agency or agencies elected by the individual to transmit such information as described in subsection (a). (2) The benefits and services for which contact information shall be so transmitted. (3) Such other information on the individual as the individual considers appropriate in connection with the transmittal. F Defense Dependents' Education and Military Family Readiness Matters I Defense Dependents' Education Matters 571. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees (a) Assistance to schools with significant numbers of military dependent students Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $40,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 ( Public Law 109–163 20 U.S.C. 7703b (b) Local educational agency defined In this section, the term local educational agency 20 U.S.C. 7713(9) 572. Impact aid for children with severe disabilities (a) In general Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 pursuant to section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $10,000,000 shall be available for payments under section 363 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398 20 U.S.C. 7703a (b) Use of certain amount Of the amount available under subsection (a) for payments as described in that subsection, $5,000,000 shall be available for such payments to local educational agencies determined by the Secretary of Defense, in the discretion of the Secretary, to have higher concentrations of military children with severe disabilities. 573. Ri’katak Guest Student Program at United States Army Garrison−Kwajalein Atoll (a) Program authorized The Secretary of the Army may conduct an assistance program to educate up to five local national students per grade, per academic year, on a space-available basis at the contractor-operated schools on United States Army Garrison─Kwajalein Atoll. The program shall be known as the Ri’katak Guest Student Program (b) Student assistance Assistance that may be provided to students participating in the program carried out pursuant to subsection (a) includes the following: (1) Classroom instruction. (2) Extracurricular activities. (3) Student meals. (4) Transportation. II Military Family Readiness Matters 576. Two-year extension of authority for reimbursement for State licensure and certification costs of spouses of members of the Armed Forces arising from relocation to another State Section 476(p)(4) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking December 31, 2022 December 31, 2024 577. Improvement of occupational license portability for military spouses through interstate compacts Section 1784 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (h) Improvement of occupational license portability through interstate compacts (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into a cooperative agreement with the Council of State Governments to assist with funding of the development of interstate compacts on licensed occupations in order to alleviate the burden associated with relicensing in such an occupation by spouse of a member of the armed forces in connection with a permanent change of duty station of members to another State. (2) Limitation on assistance per compact The amount provided under paragraph (1) as assistance for the development of any particular interstate compact may not exceed $1,000,000. (3) Limitation on total amount of assistance The total amount of assistance provided under paragraph (1) in any fiscal year may not exceed $4,000,000. (4) Annual report Not later than February 28 each year, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on interstate compacts described in paragraph (1) developed through assistance provided under that paragraph. Each report shall set forth the following: (A) Any interstate compact developed during the preceding calendar year, including the occupational licenses covered by such compact and the States agreeing to enter into such compact. (B) Any interstate compact developed during a prior calendar year into which one or more additional States agreed to enter during the preceding calendar year. (5) Expiration The authority to enter into a cooperative agreement under paragraph (1), and to provide assistance described in that paragraph pursuant to such cooperative agreement, shall expire on September 30, 2024. . 578. Modification of responsibility of the Office of Special Needs for individualized service plans for members of military families with special needs Subparagraph (F) of section 1781c(d)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (F) Requirements regarding the development of an individualized services plan for each military family member with special needs when requested in connection with the completion of a family needs assessment for the military family concerned. . 579. Clarifying technical amendment on direct hire authority for the Department of Defense for childcare services providers for Department child development centers Section 559(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 10 U.S.C. 1792 (including family childcare coordinator services and school age childcare coordinator services) childcare services 580. Pilot program on information sharing between Department of Defense and designated relatives and friends of members of the Armed Forces regarding the experiences and challenges of military service (a) Pilot program required (1) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into an agreement with the American Red Cross to carry out a pilot program under which the American Red Cross— (A) encourages a member of the Armed Forces, upon the enlistment or appointment of such member, to designate up to 10 persons to whom information regarding the military service of such member shall be disseminated using contact information obtained under paragraph (6); and (B) provides such persons, within 30 days after the date on which such persons are designated under subparagraph (A), the option to elect to receive such information regarding military service. (2) Dissemination The Secretary shall disseminate information described in paragraph (1)(A) under the pilot program on a regular basis. (3) Types of information The types of information to be disseminated under the pilot program to persons who elect to receive such information shall include information regarding— (A) aspects of daily life and routine experienced by members of the Armed Forces; (B) the challenges and stresses of military service, particularly during and after deployment as part of a contingency operation; (C) the services available to members of the Armed Forces and the dependents of such members to cope with the experiences and challenges of military service; (D) benefits administered by the Department of Defense for members of the Armed Forces and the dependents of such members; (E) a toll-free telephone number through which such persons who elect to receive information under the pilot program may request information regarding the program; and (F) such other information as the Secretary determines to be appropriate. (4) Privacy of information In carrying out the pilot program, the Secretary may not disseminate information under paragraph (3) in violation of laws and regulations pertaining to the privacy of members of the Armed Forces, including requirements pursuant to— (A) section 552a of title 5, United States Code; and (B) the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ( Public Law 104–191 (5) Notice and Modifications In carrying out the pilot program, the Secretary shall, with respect to a member of the Armed Forces— (A) ensure that such member is notified of the ability to modify designations made by such member under paragraph (1)(B); and (B) upon the request of a member, authorize such member to modify such designations at any time. (6) Contact information In making a designation under the pilot program, a member of the Armed Forces shall provide necessary contact information, specifically including an email address, to facilitate the dissemination of information regarding the military service of the member. (7) Opt-in and opt-out of program (A) Opt-in by members A member may participate in the pilot program only if the member voluntarily elects to participate in the program. A member seeking to make such an election shall make such election in a manner, and by including such information, as the Secretary and the Red Cross shall jointly specify for purposes of the pilot program. (B) Opt-in by designated recipients A person designated pursuant to paragraph (1)(A) may receive information under the pilot program only if the person makes the election described in paragraph(1)(B). (C) Opt-out In carrying out the pilot program, the Secretary shall, with respect to a person who has elected to receive information under such pilot program, cease disseminating such information to that person upon request of such person. (b) Survey and report on pilot program (1) Survey Not later than two years after the date on which the pilot program commences, the Secretary, in consultation with the American Red Cross, shall administer a survey to persons who elected to receive information under the pilot program for the purpose of receiving feedback regarding the quality of information disseminated under this section, including whether such information appropriately reflects the military career progression of members of the Armed Forces. (2) Report Not later than three years after the date on which the pilot program commences, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a final report on the pilot program which includes— (A) the results of the survey administered under paragraph (1); (B) a determination as to whether the pilot program should be made permanent; and (C) recommendations as to modifications necessary to improve the program if made permanent. (c) Termination of pilot program The pilot program shall terminate upon submission of the report required by subsection (b)(2). 581. Briefing on use of Family Advocacy Programs to address domestic violence Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a briefing on various mechanisms by which the Family Advocacy Programs (FAPs) of the military departments may be used and enhanced in order to end domestic violence among members of the Armed Forces and support survivors of such violence and their dependents. G Decorations and Awards 585. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to John J. Duffy for acts of valor in Vietnam (a) Waiver of time limitations Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President may award the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to John J. Duffy for the acts of valor in Vietnam described in subsection (b). (b) Acts of valor described The acts of valor referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of John J. Duffy on April 14 and 15, 1972, in Vietnam for which he was previously awarded the Distinguished-Service Cross. 586. Standardization of honorable service requirement for award of military decorations (a) Honorable service requirement (1) In general Chapter 57 1136. Honorable service requirement for award of military decorations No military decoration, including a medal, cross, or bar, or an associated emblem or insignia, may be awarded or presented to any person, or to a representative of the person, if the service of the person after the person distinguished himself or herself has not been honorable. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 57 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following: 1136. Honorable service requirement for award of military decorations. . (b) Conforming amendments Title 10, United States Code, is further amended as follows: (1) In section 7274— (A) in subsection (b) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking subsection (d) subsection (c) (B) by striking subsection (c); and (C) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (c). (2) (A) Section 8299 is repealed. (B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 837 is amended by striking the item relating to section 8299. (3) In section 9274— (A) in subsection (b) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking subsection (d) subsection (c) (B) by striking subsection (c); and (C) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (c). (4) In section 9279, by striking subsection (c). 587. Authority to award or present a decoration not previously recommended in a timely fashion following a review requested by Congress (a) Authority To award or present Section 1130 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d): (d) (1) A decoration may be awarded or presented following the submittal of a recommendation under subsection (b) approving the award or presentation. (2) The authority to make an award or presentation under this subsection shall apply notwithstanding any limitation described in subsection (a). . (b) Conforming and clerical amendments (1) Heading amendment The heading of such section is amended to read as follows: 1130. Consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in timely fashion: procedures for review and award or presentation . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 57 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 1130 and inserting the following new item: 1130. Consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in timely fashion: procedures for review and award or presentation. . 588. Authority to make posthumous and honorary promotions and appointments following a review requested by Congress (a) Authority To make Section 1563 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (e); and (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsections: (c) Authority To make (1) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, a posthumous or honorary promotion or appointment may be made following the submittal of a determination under subsection (b) if the determination is to approve the making of such promotion of appointment. (2) The authority to make a promotion or appointment under this subsection shall apply notwithstanding that such promotion or appointment is not otherwise authorized by law. (d) Additional benefits not To accrue The promotion or appointment of individual pursuant to subsection (c) shall not affect the retired pay or other benefits from the United States to which the individual would have been entitled based upon the individual's military service, if any, or affect any benefits to which any other person may become entitled based on the individual's military service, if any. . (b) Conforming and clerical amendments (1) Heading amendment The heading of such section is amended to read as follows: 1563. Consideration of proposals for posthumous and honorary promotions and appointments: procedures for review and promotion or appointment . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 80 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 1563 and inserting the following new item: 1563. Consideration of proposals for posthumous and honorary promotions and appointments: procedures for review and promotion or appointment. . H Other Matters 591. Military funeral honors matters (a) Full military honors ceremony for certain veterans Section 1491(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: (3) The Secretary concerned shall provide full military honors (as determined by the Secretary concerned) for the funeral of a veteran who— (A) is first interred or first inurned in Arlington National Cemetery on or after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020; (B) was awarded the medal of honor or the prisoner-of-war medal; and (C) is not entitled to full military honors by the grade of that veteran. . (b) Full military funeral honors for veterans at military installations (1) Installation plans for honors required The commander of each military installation at or through which a funeral honors detail for a veteran is provided pursuant to section 1491 of title 10, United States Code (as amended by subsection (a)), shall maintain and carry out a plan for the provision, upon request, of full military funeral honors at funerals of veterans for whom a funeral honors detail is authorized in that section. (2) Elements Each plan of an installation under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) Mechanisms to ensure compliance with the requirements applicable to the composition of funeral honors details in section 1491(b) of title 10, United States Code (as so amended). (B) Mechanisms to ensure compliance with the requirements for ceremonies for funerals in section 1491(c) of such title. (C) In addition to the ceremonies required pursuant to subparagraph (B), the provision of a gun salute for each funeral by appropriate personnel, including personnel of the installation, members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces residing in the vicinity of the installation who are ordered to funeral honors duty, and members of veterans organizations or other organizations referred to in section 1491(b)(2) of such title. (D) Mechanisms for the provision of support authorized by section 1491(d) of such title. (E) Such other mechanisms and activities as the Secretary concerned considers appropriate in order to assure that full military funeral honors are provided upon request at funerals of veterans. (3) Definitions In this subsection: (A) The term Secretary concerned (B) The term veteran 592. Inclusion of homeschooled students in Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps units Section 2031 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (g) (1) Each public secondary educational institution that maintains a unit under this section shall permit membership in the unit to homeschooled students residing in the area served by the institution who are qualified for membership in the unit (but for lack of enrollment in the institution). (2) A student who is a member of a unit pursuant to this subsection shall count toward the satisfaction by the institution concerned of the requirement in subsection (b)(1) relating to the minimum number of student members in the unit necessary for the continuing maintenance of the unit. . 593. Sense of Senate on the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (JROTC) is a valuable program that instill the values of citizenship, service to the community, personal responsibility and a sense of accomplishment in high school students; (2) the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps is supported by all the Armed Forces, and there are Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps units in all 50 States, 4 United States territories, and the District of Columbia; (3) the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps consistently improves student outcomes across a wide variety of academic and nonacademic data points, including grade point average, high school graduation and college acceptance rates, standardized test scores, drop-out rates, discipline problems, and leadership skills; (4) the Department of Defense should view the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps as a unique program to help close the divide between the military and the greater civilian community in the United States; (5) given the increased funding and more flexible policy authorized in the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (6) the desired number of Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps units should be at least 3,700 in order to relieve a significant backlog in requests to establish such units. VI Compensation and Other Personnel Benefits A Pay and Allowances 601. Expansion of eligibility for exceptional transitional compensation for dependents to dependents of current members Section 1059(m) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the subsection heading, by inserting members or dependents of (2) by inserting member or former member (3) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and (4) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3): (3) For purposes of the provision of benefits under this section pursuant to this subsection, a member shall be considered separated from active duty upon the earliest of— (A) the date an administrative separation is initiated by a commander of the member; (B) the date the court-martial sentence is adjudged if the sentence, as adjudged, includes a dismissal, dishonorable discharge, bad conduct discharge, or forfeiture of all pay and allowances; or (C) the date the member’s term of service expires. . B Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays 611. One-year extension of certain expiring bonus and special pay authorities (a) Authorities relating To reserve forces Section 910(g) of title 37, United States Code, relating to income replacement payments for reserve component members experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service, is amended by striking December 31, 2019 December 31, 2020 (b) Title 10 authorities relating to health care professionals The following sections of title 10, United States Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2019 December 31, 2020 (1) Section 2130a(a)(1), relating to nurse officer candidate accession program. (2) Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education loans for certain health professionals who serve in the Selected Reserve. (c) Authorities relating to nuclear officers Section 333(i) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking December 31, 2019 December 31, 2020 (d) Authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2019 December 31, 2020 (1) Section 331(h), relating to general bonus authority for enlisted members. (2) Section 332(g), relating to general bonus authority for officers. (3) Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive pay and bonus authorities for officers. (4) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for officers in health professions. (5) Section 336(g), relating to contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps. (6) Section 351(h), relating to hazardous duty pay. (7) Section 352(g), relating to assignment pay or special duty pay. (8) Section 353(i), relating to skill incentive pay or proficiency bonus. (9) Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to high priority units. (e) Authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing Section 403(b)(7)(E) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking December 31, 2019 December 31, 2020 C Travel and Transportation Allowances 621. Extension of pilot program on a Government lodging program Section 914(b) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck 5 U.S.C. 5911 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2020 622. Reinvestment of travel refunds by the Department of Defense (a) Refunds for official travel Subchapter I of chapter 8 456. Managed travel program refunds (a) Credit of refunds The Secretary of Defense may credit refunds attributable to Department of Defense managed travel programs as a direct result of official travel to such operation and maintenance or research, development, test, and evaluation accounts of the Department as designated by the Secretary that are available for obligation for the fiscal year in which the refund or amount is collected. (b) Use of refunds Refunds credited under subsection (a) may only be used for official travel or operations and efficiency improvements for improved financial management of official travel. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) Managed travel program The term managed travel program (2) Refund The term refund . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 8 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 455 the following new item: 456. Managed travel program refunds. . (c) Clarification on retention of travel promotional items Section 1116(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 ( Public Law 107–107 5 U.S.C. 5702 (1) by striking Definition “Definitions (1) The term ; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) The term general public . D Disability Pay, Retired Pay, and Survivor Benefits 631. Contributions to Department of Defense Military Retirement Fund based on pay costs per Armed Force rather than on Armed Forces-wide basis (a) Determination of contributions generally Section 1465(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking single level percentage of basic pay for active duty (other than the Coast Guard) and for full-time National Guard duty percentage of basic pay for each armed force (other than the Coast Guard) and for any full-time National Guard duty (B) in subparagraph (B)— (i) by striking single level (ii) by striking members of the Selected Reserve of the armed forces (other than the Coast Guard) each armed force (other than the Coast Guard) for members of the Selected Reserve (C) in the flush matter following subparagraph (B), by striking single level (2) in paragraph (4)— (A) by striking a single level percentage determined percentages (B) in the flush matter following subparagraph (B), by striking single level (b) Conforming amendments (1) Determination of contributions Section 1465(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) in subparagraph (A)— (I) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking product aggregate of the products (II) in clause (i), by striking single level percentage of basic pay percentage of basic pay for each armed force (other than the Coast Guard) (III) in clause (ii), by striking for active duty (other than the Coast Guard) and for full-time National Guard duty for such armed force for active duty and for any full-time National Guard duty (ii) in subparagraph (B)— (I) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking product aggregate of the products (II) in clause (i), by striking single level percentage of basic pay and of compensation (paid pursuant to section 206 of title 37) percentage of basic pay and of compensation (paid pursuant to section 206 of title 37) for each armed force (other than the Coast Guard) (III) in clause (ii), by striking the armed forces (other than the Coast Guard) such armed force (B) in paragraph (3), by striking single level (2) Payments of contributions Section 1466(a) of such title is amended— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking product aggregate of the products (ii) in subparagraph (A), by striking level percentage of basic pay percentage of basic pay for each armed force (other than the Coast Guard) (iii) in subparagraph (B), by striking for active duty (other than for the Coast Guard) and for full-time National Guard duty for such armed force for active duty and for any full-time National Guard duty (B) in paragraph (2)— (i) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking product aggregate of the products (ii) in subparagraph (A), by striking level percentage of basic pay and of compensation (paid pursuant to section 206 of title 37) percentage of basic pay and of compensation (paid pursuant to section 206 of title 37) for each armed force (other than the Coast Guard) (iii) in subparagraph (B), by striking the armed forces (other than the Coast Guard) such armed force (c) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect on October 1, 2019, and shall apply with respect to determinations of contributions to the Department of Defense Military Retirement Fund, and payments into the Fund, beginning with fiscal year 2021. 632. Modification of authorities on eligibility for and replacement of gold star lapel buttons (a) Expansion of authority To determine next of kin for issuance Section 1126 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking widows, parents, and (2) in subsection (b), by striking the widow and to each parent and each (3) in subsection (d)— (A) by striking paragraphs (1), (2), (3), and (4) and inserting the following new paragraph (1): (1) The term next of kin ; and (B) by redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), (7), and (8) as paragraphs (2), (3), (4), and (5), respectively. (b) Replacement Subsection (c) of such section is amended by striking and payment and without cost. E Commissary and Non-Appropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and Operations 641. Defense resale system matters (a) In general The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall, in coordination with the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, maintain oversight of business transformation efforts of the defense commissary system and the exchange store system in order to ensure the following: (1) Development of an intercomponent business strategy that maximizes efficiencies and results in a viable defense resale system in the future. (2) Preservation of patron savings and satisfaction from and in the defense commissary system and exchange stores system. (3) Sustainment of financial support of the defense commissary and exchange systems for morale, welfare, and recreation (MWR) services of the Armed Forces. (b) Executive Resale Board advice on operations of systems The Executive Resale Board of the Department of Defense shall advise the Under Secretary on the implementation of sustainable, complementary operations of the defense commissary system and the exchange stores system. (c) Practices and services (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall, acting through the Under Secretary and with advice from the Executive Resale Board, require the Defense Commissary Agency and the Military Exchange Service to identify and implement practices and services described in paragraph (2) across the defense resale system. (2) Practices and services Practices and services described in this paragraph shall include the following: (A) Best commercial business practices. (B) Shared-services systems that increase efficiencies across the defense resale system, including in transportation of goods, application-based marketing initiatives and other mobile electronic-commerce programs, facilities construction, back-office information technology systems, human resource management, legal services, financial services, and advertising. (C) Integration of services provided by the exchange stores system within commissary system facilities, as appropriate, including services such as dry cleaning, health and wellness activities, pharmacies, urgent care centers, food, and other retail services. (d) Information technology modernization The Secretary shall, acting through the Under Secretary and with advice from the Executive Resale Board, require the Defense Commissary Agency and the Military Exchange Service to do as follows: (1) Field new technologies and best business practices for information technology for the defense resale system. (2) Implement cutting-edge marketing opportunities across the defense resale system. (e) Inclusion of advertising in operating expenses of commissary stores Section 2483(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following paragraph: (7) Advertising of commissary sales on materials available within commissary stores and at other on-base locations. . 642. Treatment of fees on services provided as supplemental funds for commissary operations Section 2483(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting fees on services provided, handling fees for tobacco products, 643. Procurement by commissary stores of certain locally sourced products The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the dairy products and fruits and vegetables procured for commissary stores under the defense commissary system are, to the extent practicable, locally sourced in order to ensure the availability of the freshest possible dairy products and fruits and vegetables for patrons of the stores. VII Health Care Provisions A TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits 701. Contraception coverage parity under the TRICARE program (a) In general Section 1074d(b)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: (including all methods of contraception approved by the Food and Drug Administration, contraceptive care (including with respect to insertion, removal, and follow up), sterilization procedures, and patient education and counseling in connection therewith) (b) Prohibition on cost-sharing for certain services (1) TRICARE Select Section 1075(c) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) For all beneficiaries under this section, there is no cost-sharing for any method of contraception provided by a network provider. . (2) TRICARE Prime Section 1075a(b) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (5) For all beneficiaries under this section, there is no cost-sharing for any method of contraception provided under TRICARE Prime. . (3) Pharmacy Benefits Program Section 1074g(a)(6) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (D) Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), there is no cost-sharing for any prescription contraceptive on the uniform formulary provided by a retail pharmacy described in subsection (a)(2)(E)(ii) or the national mail-order pharmacy program. . (c) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect on January 1, 2020. 702. TRICARE payment options for retirees and their dependents (a) In general Section 1099 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d): (d) Payment options (1) A member or former member of the uniformed services, or a dependent thereof, eligible for medical care and dental care under section 1074(b) or 1076 of this title shall pay a premium for coverage under this chapter. (2) To the maximum extent practicable, a premium owed by a member, former member, or dependent under paragraph (1) shall be withheld from the retired, retainer, or equivalent pay of the member, former member, or dependent. In all other cases, a premium shall be paid in a frequency and method determined by the Secretary. . (b) Conforming and clerical amendments (1) Conforming amendments Section 1097a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) by striking subsection (c); and (B) by redesignating subsections (d), (e), and (f) as subsections (c), (d), and (e), respectively. (2) Heading amendments (A) Automatic enrollments The heading for section 1097a of such title is amended to read as follows: 1097a. TRICARE Prime: automatic enrollments . (B) Enrollment system and payment options The heading for section 1099 of such title is amended to read as follows: 1099. Health care enrollment system and payment options . (3) Clerical amendments The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 55 of such title is amended— (A) by striking the item relating to section 1097a and inserting the following new item: 1097a. TRICARE Prime: automatic enrollments. ; and (B) by striking the item relating to section 1099 and inserting the following new item: 1099. Health care enrollment system and payment options. . (c) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall apply to health care coverage beginning on or after January 1, 2021. 703. Lead level screening and testing for children (a) Comprehensive screening, testing, and reporting guidelines (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall establish clinical practice guidelines for health care providers employed by the Department of Defense on screening, testing and reporting of blood lead levels in children. (2) Use of CDC recommendations Guidelines established under paragraph (1) shall reflect recommendations made by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention with respect to the screening, testing, and reporting of blood lead levels in children. (3) Dissemination of guidelines Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall disseminate the clinical practice guidelines established under paragraph (1) to health care providers of the Department of Defense. (b) Care provided in accordance with CDC guidance The Secretary shall ensure that any care provided by the Department of Defense to a child for lead poisoning shall be carried out in accordance with applicable guidance issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (c) Sharing of results of testing (1) In general With respect to a child who receives from the Department of Defense a test for lead poisoning— (A) the Secretary shall provide the results of the test to the parent or guardian of the child; and (B) notwithstanding any requirements for the confidentiality of health information under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ( Public Law 104–191 (i) the relevant health department of the State in which the child resides if the child resides in the United States; or (ii) if the child resides outside the United States— (I) the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and (II) the appropriate authority of the country in which the child resides. (2) State defined In this subsection, the term State (d) Report (1) In general Not later than January 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report detailing, with respect to the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on the date of the report, the following: (A) The number of children who were tested by the Department of Defense for the level of lead in the blood of the child, and of such number, the number who were found to have elevated blood lead levels. (B) The number of children who were screened by the Department of Defense for an elevated risk of lead exposure. (C) The treatment provided to children pursuant to chapter 55 (2) Elevated blood lead level defined In this paragraph, the term elevated blood lead level 704. Provision of blood testing for firefighters of Department of Defense to determine exposure to perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (a) In general Beginning on October 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall provide blood testing to determine and document potential exposure to perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (commonly known as PFAS (b) Firefighter defined In this section, the term firefighter B Health Care Administration 711. Modification of organization of military health system (a) Administration of military medical treatment facilities Subsection (a) of section 1073c of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), and (F) as subparagraphs (C), (D), (E), (G), (H), and (I), respectively; (B) by inserting before subparagraph (C), as redesignated by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, the following new subparagraphs: (A) provision and delivery of health care within each such facility; (B) management of privileging, scope of practice, and quality of health care provided within each such facility; ; and (C) inserting the following new subparagraph: (F) supply and equipment; ; (2) in paragraph (2)— (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) through (G) as subparagraphs (E) through (H), respectively; (B) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following new subparagraph (D): (D) to identify the capacity of each military medical treatment facility to support clinical readiness standards of health care providers established by the Secretary of a military department or the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs; and (C) by amending subparagraph (F), as redesignated by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, to read as follows: (F) to determine, in coordination with each Secretary of a military department, manning, including joint manning, assigned to military medical treatment facilities and intermediary organizations; and (3) in paragraph (3)— (A) in subparagraph (A)— (i) by inserting on behalf of the military departments, ensuring (ii) by striking and civilian employees (B) in subparagraph (B), by inserting on behalf of the Defense Health Agency, furnishing (b) DHA Assistant Director Subsection (b)(2) of such section is amended by striking equivalent education and experience the education and experience to perform the responsibilities of the position. (c) DHA Deputy Assistant Directors Subsection (c) of such section is amended— (1) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking across the military health system at military medical treatment facilities (2) in paragraph (4)(B), by inserting at military medical treatment facilities (d) Military medical treatment facility Subsection (f) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) The term military medical treatment facility (A) any fixed facility of the Department of Defense that is outside of a deployed environment and used primarily for health care; and (B) any other location used for purposes of providing health care services as designated by the Secretary of Defense. . (e) Technical amendments Subsection (a) of such section is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking paragraph (4) paragraph (5) (2) by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (6); (3) by redesignating the first paragraph (4) as paragraph (5); and (4) by moving the second paragraph (4) so as to appear before paragraph (5), as redesignated by paragraph (3) of this subsection. 712. Support by military health system of medical requirements of combatant commands (a) In general Section 712 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (1) in subsection (a), by amending paragraph (1) to read as follows: (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall, acting through the Secretaries of the military departments, the Defense Health Agency, and the Joint Staff, implement an organizational framework of the military health system that effectively implements chapter 55 ; (2) in subsection (e), by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively, and by moving such paragraphs so as to appear at the end of subsection (d); (3) by striking subsection (e), as amended by paragraph (2) of this subsection; (4) by redesignating subsections (b) through (d) as subsections (c) through (e), respectively; (5) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): (b) Additional duties of Surgeons General of the Armed Forces The Surgeons General of the Armed Forces shall have the following duties: (1) To ensure the readiness for operational deployment of medical and dental personnel and deployable medical or dental teams or units of the Armed Force or Armed Forces concerned. (2) To meet medical readiness standards, subject to standards and metrics established by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs. (3) With respect to uniformed medical and dental personnel of the military department concerned— (A) to assign such personnel to military medical treatment facilities, under the operational control of the commander or director of the facility, or to partnerships with civilian or other medical facilities for training activities specific to such military department; and (B) to maintain readiness of such personnel for operational deployment. (4) To provide logistical support for operational deployment of medical and dental personnel and deployable medical or dental teams or units of the Armed Force or Armed Forces concerned. (5) To oversee mobilization and demobilization in connection with the operational deployment of medical and dental personnel of the Armed Force or Armed Forces concerned. (6) To develop operational medical capabilities required to support the warfighter, and to develop policy relating to such capabilities. (7) To provide health professionals to serve in leadership positions across the military healthcare system. (8) To deliver operational clinical services under the operational control of the combatant commands— (A) on ships and planes; and (B) on installations outside of military medical treatment facilities. (9) To manage privileging, scope of practice, and quality of health care in the settings described in paragraph (8). ; (6) in subsection (c), as redesignated by paragraph (4) of this subsection— (A) in the subsection heading, by inserting Agency regions (B) in paragraph (1)— (i) in the paragraph heading, by inserting Agency regions (ii) by striking defense health Defense Health Agency (7) in subsection (d), as redesignated by paragraph (4) of this subsection— (A) in the subsection heading, by inserting Agency regions (B) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking defense health Defense Health Agency (C) in paragraph (3), by striking subsection (b) subsection (c) (8) in subsection (e), as redesignated by paragraph (4) of this subsection— (A) in paragraph (2)— (i) by amending subparagraph (A) to read as follows: (A) In general The Secretaries of the military departments shall coordinate with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Defense Health Agency to direct resources allocated to the military departments to support requirements related to readiness and operational medicine support that are established by the combatant commands and validated by the Joint Staff. ; and (ii) in subparagraph (B), in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking Based on shall— The Director of the Defense Health Agency, in coordination with the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, shall— (B) in paragraph (3), as moved and redesignated by paragraph (2) of this subsection, in the second sentence— (i) by inserting primarily through (ii) by inserting , in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments, the Defense Health Agency (C) by adding at the end the following: (5) Manpower (A) Administrative control of military personnel Each Secretary of a military department shall exercise administrative control of members of the Armed Forces assigned to military medical treatment facilities, including personnel assignment and issuance of military orders. (B) Oversight of certain personnel by the Director of the Defense Health Agency In situations in which members of the Armed Forces provide health care services at a military medical treatment facility, the Director of the Defense Health Agency shall maintain oversight for the provision of care delivered by those individuals through policies, procedures, and privileging responsibilities of the military medical treatment facility. . (b) Conforming amendments (1) Heading amendment The heading for section 712 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 712. Support by military healthcare system of medical requirements of combatant commands . (2) Clerical amendment The table of contents for such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 712 and inserting the following new item: Sec. 712. Support by military healthcare system of medical requirements of combatant commands. . 713. Tours of duty of commanders or directors of military treatment facilities (a) In general Not later than January 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a minimum length for the tour of duty of an individual as a commander or director of a military treatment facility. (b) Tours of duty (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (2), the length of the tour of duty as a commander or director of a military treatment facility of any individual assigned to such position after January 1, 2021, may not be shorter than the longer of— (A) the length established pursuant to subsection (a); or (B) four years. (2) Waiver (A) In general The Secretary of the military department concerned, in coordination with the Director of the Defense Health Agency, may authorize a tour of duty of an individual as a commander or director of a military treatment facility of a shorter length than is otherwise provided for in paragraph (1) if the Secretary determines, in the discretion of the Secretary, that there is good cause for a tour of duty in such position of shorter length. (B) Case-by-case basis Any determination under subparagraph (A) shall be made on a case-by-case basis. 714. Expansion of strategy to improve acquisition of managed care support contracts under TRICARE program Section 705(c)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 10 U.S.C. 1073a , other than overseas medical support contracts 715. Establishment of regional medical hubs to support combatant commands (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall establish not more than four regional medical hubs, consistent with the defense health regions established under section 712 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (b) Timing Establishment of regional medical hubs under subsection (a) shall commence not later than October 1, 2020, and shall be completed not later than October 1, 2022. (c) Leadership Each regional medical hub established under subsection (a) shall be led by a commander or director who is a member of the Armed Forces serving in a grade not higher than major general or rear admiral and who shall be— (1) selected by the Director of the Defense Health Agency from among members of the Armed Forces recommended by the military departments for service in such position; and (2) under the authority, direction, and control of the Director while serving in such position. (d) Designation of primary center (1) In general Each regional medical hub established under subsection (a) shall include a major military medical center designated by the Secretary to serve as the primary center for the provision of specialized medical services in that region. (2) Capabilities A major military medical center may not be designated under paragraph (1) unless the center— (A) includes one or more large graduate medical education training platforms; and (B) provides, at a minimum, role 4 medical care. (3) Location (A) In general Any major military medical center designated under paragraph (1) shall be geographically located so as to maximize the support provided by uniformed medical resources to the combatant commands. (B) Collocation with major aerial debarkation points In designating major military medical centers under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall give consideration to the collocation of such centers with major aerial debarkation points of patients in the medical evacuation system of the United States Transportation Command. (4) Major health care delivery platform A major military medical center designated under paragraph (1) shall serve as the major health care delivery platform for the provision of complex specialized medical care in the region, whether through patient referrals from other military medical treatment facilities or through referrals from either civilian medical facilities or healthcare facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs. (e) Additional military medical centers Consistent with section 1073d of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary, in establishing regional medical hubs under subsection (a), may establish additional military medical centers in the following locations: (1) Locations with large beneficiary populations. (2) Locations that serve as the primary readiness platforms of the Armed Forces. (f) Patient referrals and coordination In implementing the regional medical hubs established under subsection (a), the Director of the Defense Health Agency shall ensure effective and efficient medical care referrals and coordination among military medical treatment facilities and among local or regional high-performing health systems through local or regional partnerships with institutional or individual civilian providers. 716. Monitoring of adverse event data on dietary supplement use by members of the Armed Forces (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall modify the electronic health record system of the military health system to include data regarding the use by members of the Armed Forces of dietary supplements and adverse events with respect to dietary supplements. (b) Requirements The modifications required by subsection (a) shall ensure that the electronic health record system of the military health system— (1) records adverse event report data regarding dietary supplement use by members of the Armed Forces; (2) generates standard reports on adverse event data that can be aggregated for analysis; (3) issues automated alerts to signal a significant change in adverse event reporting or to signal a risk of interaction with a medication or other treatment; and (4) provides for reporting of adverse event report data regarding dietary supplement use by members of the Armed Forces to the Food and Drug Administration. (c) Outreach The Secretary shall conduct outreach to health care providers in the military health system to educate such providers on the importance of entering adverse event report data regarding dietary supplement use by members of the Armed Forces into the electronic health record system of the military health system and reporting such data to the Food and Drug Administration. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) Adverse event The term adverse event 21 U.S.C. 379aa–1(a) (2) Dietary supplement The term dietary supplement 21 U.S.C. 321(ff) 717. Enhancement of recordkeeping with respect to exposure by members of the Armed Forces to certain occupational and environmental hazards while deployed overseas (a) Inclusion in medical tracking system of occupational and environmental health risks in deployment area (1) Elements of medical tracking system Subsection (b)(1)(A) of section 1074f of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) in clause (ii), by striking and (B) in clause (iii), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and (C) by adding at the end the following new clause: (iv) accurately record any exposure to occupational and environmental health risks during the course of their deployment. . (2) Recordkeeping Subsection (c) of such section is amended by inserting after deployment area (including the results of any assessment performed by the Secretary of occupational and environmental health risks for such area) (b) Postdeployment medical examination and reassessments Section 1074f of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (g) Additional requirements for postdeployment medical examinations and health reassessments (1) The Secretary of Defense shall standardize and make available to a provider that conducts a postdeployment medical examination or reassessment under the system described in subsection (a) questions relating to occupational and environmental health exposure. (2) The Secretary, to the extent practicable, shall ensure that the medical record of a member includes information on the external cause relating to a diagnosis of the member, including by associating an external cause code (as issued under the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (or any successor revision)). . (c) Access to information in burn pit registry (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that all medical personnel of the Department of Defense have access to the information contained in the burn pit registry. (2) Burn pit registry defined In this subsection, the term burn pit registry Public Law 112–260 38 U.S.C. 527 C Reports and Other Matters 721. Extension and clarification of authority for Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund Title XVII of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( Public Law 111–84 (1) in section 1701(a)— (A) by striking Subject to subsection (b), the The (B) by striking subsection (b); and (C) by redesignating subsections (c) through (f) as subsections (b) through (e), respectively; (2) in section 1702(a)(1), by striking hereafter in this title in this section (3) in section 1703, in subsections (a) and (c), by striking the facility the James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center (4) in section 1704— (A) in subsections (a)(3), (a)(4)(A), and (b)(1), by striking the facility the James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center (B) in subsection (e), as most recently amended by section 731 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 September 30, 2020 September 30, 2021 (5) in section 1705— (A) in subsection (a), by striking the facility the James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center (in this section referred to as the JALFHCC (B) in subsection (b), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking the facility the JALFHCC (C) in subsection (c)— (i) by striking the facility the JALFHCC (ii) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) To permit the JALFHCC to enter into personal services contracts to carry out health care responsibilities in the JALFHCC to the same extent and subject to the same conditions and limitations as apply under section 1091 of title 10, United States Code, to the Secretary of Defense with respect to health care responsibilities in medical treatment facilities of the Department of Defense. . 722. Appointment of non-ex officio members of the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine (a) Appointment by non-ex officio members Subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of section 178(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (C) six members, each of whom shall be appointed at the expiration of the term of a member appointed under this subparagraph, as provided for in paragraph (2), by the members currently serving on the Council pursuant to this subparagraph and paragraph (2), including the member whose expiring term is so being filled by such appointment. . (b) Repeal of obsolete authority establishing staggered terms Paragraph (2) of such section is amended— (1) by striking except that— any person except that any person (2) by striking ; and (3) by striking subparagraph (B). (c) Effective date (1) In general The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. (2) Construction for current members Nothing in the amendments made by this section shall be construed to terminate or otherwise alter the appointment or term of service of members of the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine who are so serving on the date of the enactment of this Act pursuant to an appointment under paragraph (1)(C) or (2) of section 178(c) of title 10, United States Code, made before that date. 723. Officers authorized to command Army dental units Section 7081(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking Dental Corps Officer Army Medical Department Officer 724. Establishment of Academic Health System in National Capital Region (a) In general Chapter 104 section 2113a 2113b. Academic Health System (a) In general The Secretary of Defense may establish an Academic Health System to integrate the health care, health professions education, and health research activities of the military health system, including under this chapter, in the National Capital Region. (b) Leadership (1) The Secretary may appoint employees of the Department of Defense to leadership positions in the Academic Health System established under subsection (a). (2) Such positions may include responsibilities for management of the health care, health professions education, and health research activities described in subsection (a) and are in addition to similar leadership positions for members of the armed forces. (c) Administration The Secretary may use such authorities under this chapter relating to the health care, health professions education, and health research activities of the military health system as the Secretary considers appropriate for the administration of the Academic Health System established under subsection (a). (d) National Capital Region defined In this section, the term National Capital Region . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 104 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2113a the following new item: 2113b. Academic Health System. . 725. Provision of veterinary services by veterinary professionals of the Department of Defense in emergencies (a) In general Chapter 53 1060c. Provision of veterinary services in emergencies (a) In general A veterinary professional described in subsection (b) may provide veterinary services for the purposes described in subsection (c) in any State, the District of Columbia, or a territory or possession of the United States, without regard to where such veterinary professional or the patient animal are located, if the provision of such services is within the scope of the authorized duties of such veterinary professional for the Department of Defense. (b) Veterinary professional described A veterinary professional described in this subsection is an individual who is— (1) (A) a member of the armed forces, a civilian employee of the Department of Defense, or otherwise credentialed and privileged at a Federal veterinary institution or location designated by the Secretary of Defense for purposes of this section; or (B) a member of the National Guard performing training or duty under section 502(f) of title 32; (2) certified as a veterinary professional by a certification recognized by the Secretary of Defense; and (3) currently licensed by a State, the District of Columbia, or a territory or possession of the United States to provide veterinary services. (c) Purposes described The purposes described in this subsection are veterinary services in response to any of the following: (1) A national emergency declared by the President pursuant to the National Emergencies Act ( 50 U.S.C. 1601 (2) A major disaster or an emergency (as those terms are defined in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act ( 42 U.S.C. 5122 (3) A public health emergency declared by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act ( 42 U.S.C. 247d (4) An extraordinary emergency, as determined by the Secretary of Agriculture under section 10407(b) of the Animal Health Protection Act ( 7 U.S.C. 8306(b) . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 53 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1060b the following new item: 1060c. Provision of veterinary services in emergencies. . 726. Five-year extension of authority to continue the DOD-VA Health Care Sharing Incentive Fund Section 8111(d)(3) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking September 30, 2020 September 30, 2025 727. Pilot Program on civilian and military partnerships to enhance interoperability and medical surge capability and capacity of National Disaster Medical System (a) In general The Secretary of Defense may carry out a pilot program to establish partnerships with public, private, and nonprofit health care organizations, institutions, and entities in collaboration with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Secretary of Transportation to enhance the interoperability and medical surge capability and capacity of the National Disaster Medical System under section 2812 of the Public Health Service Act ( 42 U.S.C. 300hh–11 (b) Duration The Secretary of Defense may carry out the pilot program under subsection (a) for a period of not more than five years. (c) Locations The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program under subsection (a) at not fewer than five aeromedical transport hub regions in the United States. (d) Requirements In establishing partnerships under the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary, in collaboration with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Secretary of Transportation, shall establish requirements under such partnerships for staffing, specialized training, medical logistics, telemedicine, patient regulating, movement, situational status reporting, tracking, and surveillance. (e) Evaluation metrics The Secretary of Defense shall establish metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of the pilot program under subsection (a). (f) Reports (1) Initial report (A) In general Not later than 180 days after the commencement of the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the pilot program. (B) Elements The report required by subparagraph (A) shall include the following: (i) A description of the pilot program. (ii) The requirements established under subsection (d). (iii) The evaluation metrics established under subsection (e). (iv) Such other matters relating to the pilot program as the Secretary considers appropriate. (2) Final report (A) In general Not later than 180 days after completion of the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the pilot program. (B) Elements The report required by subparagraph (A) shall include the following: (i) A description of the pilot program, including the partnerships established under the pilot program as described in subsection (a). (ii) An assessment of the effectiveness of the pilot program. (iii) Such recommendations for legislative or administrative action as the Secretary considers appropriate in light of the pilot program, including recommendations for extending or making permanent the authority for the pilot program. 728. Modification of requirements for longitudinal medical study on blast pressure exposure of members of the Armed Forces Section 734 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 (1) in subsection (b)— (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ; and (B) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and (C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) assess the feasibility and advisability of— (A) uploading the data gathered from the study into the Defense Occupational and Environmental Health Readiness System – Industrial Hygiene (DOEHRS-IH) or similar system; and (B) allowing personnel of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs to have access to such system. ; and (2) in subsection (c)— (A) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and (B) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2): (2) Annual status report Not later than January 1 of each year during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 and ending on the completion of the study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a status report on the study. . VIII Acquisition policy, acquisition management, and related matters A Contracting and acquisition provisions 801. Pilot program on intellectual property evaluation for acquisition programs (a) Pilot program Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the military departments may jointly carry out a pilot program to assess mechanisms to evaluate intellectual property, such as technical data deliverables and associated license rights, including commercially available intellectual property valuation analysis and techniques, in acquisition programs for which they are responsible to better understand the benefits associated with these techniques on— (1) the development of cost-effective intellectual property strategies, and (2) assessment and management of the value and costs of intellectual property during acquisition and sustainment activities (including source selection evaluation factors) throughout the acquisition lifecycle for any acquisition program selected by the Secretary concerned. (b) Activities Activities carried out under the pilot program may include the following: (1) Establishing a team of Department of Defense and private sector subject matter experts to identify, to the maximum extent practicable at each milestone for a selected acquisition programs, intellectual property evaluation techniques to obtain quantitative and qualitative analysis related to the value of intellectual property during the procurement, production and deployment, and operations and support phases of the acquisition of the systems under the program. (2) Assessment of commercial valuation techniques for intellectual property for use by the Department of Defense. (3) Assessment of the feasibility of agency-level oversight to standardize intellectual property evaluation practices and procedures. (4) Assessment of contracting mechanisms to speed delivery of intellectual property to the Armed Forces or reduce sustainment costs. (5) Assessment of agency acquisition planning to ensure procurement of intellectual property deliverables and intellectual property rights necessary for Government-planned sustainment activities. (6) Engagement with the commercial industry to— (A) support the development of strategies and program requirements to aid in acquisition and transition planning for intellectual property; (B) support the development and improvement of intellectual property strategies as part of life-cycle sustainment plans; and (C) propose and implement alternative and innovative methods of intellectual property valuation, prioritization, and evaluation techniques for intellectual property. (7) Recommending to the cognizant program manager for an acquisition program evaluation techniques and contracting mechanisms for implementation into the acquisition and sustainment activities of that acquisition program. (c) Acquisition of commercial and nondevelopmental items, products, and services The pilot program shall provide criteria to ensure the appropriate consideration of commercial items and non-developmental items as alternatives to items to be specifically developed for the acquisition program, including evaluation of the benefits of reduced risk regarding cost, schedule, and performance associated with commercial and non-developmental items, products, and services. (d) Assessments Not later than November 1, 2020, and annually thereafter through 2023, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretaries concerned, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a joint report on the pilot program conducted under this section. The report shall, at a minimum, include— (1) a description of the acquisition programs selected by the Secretary concerned; (2) a description of the specific activities in paragraph (b) that were performed under each program; (3) an assessment of the effectiveness of the activities; (4) an assessment of improvements to acquisition or sustainment activities related to the pilot program; and (5) an assessment of cost-savings from the activities related to the pilot program, including any improvement to mission success during the operations and support phase of the program. 802. Pilot program to use alpha contracting teams for complex requirements (a) In general (1) The Secretary of Defense shall select at least 2, and up to 5, initiatives to participate in a pilot to use teams that, with the advice of expert third parties, focus on the development of complex contract technical requirements for services, with each team focusing on developing achievable technical requirements that are appropriately valued and identifying the most effective acquisition strategy to achieve those requirements. (2) The Secretary shall develop metrics for tracking progress of the program at improving quality and acquisition cycle time. (b) Development of criteria and initiatives (1) Not later than February 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall establish the pilot program and notify the congressional defense committees of the criteria used to select initiatives and the metrics used to track progress. (2) Not later than May 1, 2020, the Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees of the initiatives selected for the program. (3) Not later than December 1, 2020, the Secretary shall brief the congressional defense committees on the progress of the selected initiatives, including the progress of the initiatives at improving quality and acquisition cycle time according to the metrics developed under subsection (a)(2). 803. Modification of written approval requirement for task and delivery order single contract awards Section 2304a(d)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subparagraph (B), by redesignating clauses (i) and (ii) as subclauses (I) and (II), respectively; (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) as clauses (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv), respectively; (3) by striking No task or delivery order contract (A) Except as provided under subparagraph (B), no task or delivery order contract (4) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (B) A task or delivery order contract in an amount estimated to exceed $100,000,000 (including all options) may be awarded to a single source without the written determination otherwise required under subparagraph (A) if the head of the agency has made a written determination pursuant to section 2304(c) of this title that other than competitive procedures may be used for the awarding of such contract. . 804. Extension of authority to acquire products and services produced in countries along a major route of supply to Afghanistan Section 801(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( Public Law 111–84 Public Law 115–91 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2021 805. Modification of Director of Operational Test and Evaluation report Section 139(h)(5) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (5) The Director shall solicit comments from the Secretaries of the military departments on each report of the Director to Congress under this section and summarize the comments in the report. The Director shall determine the amount of time available for the Secretaries to comment on the draft report on a case by case basis, and consider the extent to which substantive discussions have already been held between the Director and the military department. The Director shall reserve the right to issue the report without comment from a military department if the department's comments are not received within the time provided, and shall indicate any such omission in the report. . 806. Department of Defense use of fixed-price contracts (a) Department of Defense review (1) In general The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall review how the Department of Defense informs decisions to use fixed-price contracts to support broader acquisition objectives, to ensure that such decisions are made strategically and consistently. The review should include decisions on the use of the various types of fixed price contracts, including fixed-price incentive contracts. (2) Briefing Not later than February 1, 2020, the Under Secretary shall brief the congressional defense committees on the findings of the review required under paragraph (1). (b) Comptroller General report (1) In general Not later than February 1, 2021, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the Department of Defense's use of fixed-price contracts, including different types of fixed-price contracts. (2) Elements The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: (A) A description of the extent to which fixed-price contracts have been used over time and the conditions in which they are used. (B) An assessment of the effects of the decisions to use of fixed-price contract types, such as any additional costs or savings or efficiencies in contract administration. (C) An assessment of how decisions to use various types of fixed-price contracts affects the contract closeout process. (c) Delayed implementation of regulations requiring the use of fixed-price contracts for foreign military sales The regulations prescribed pursuant to section 830(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 22 U.S.C. 2762 807. Pilot program to accelerate contracting and pricing processes Section 890 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (1) by striking subsection (b); (2) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (b) and (c), respectively; (3) in subsection (b), as redesignated by paragraph (2), by striking and an assessment of whether the program should be continued or expanded (4) in subsection (c), as so redesignated, by striking January 2, 2021 January 2, 2023 808. Pilot program to streamline decision-making processes for weapon systems (a) Candidate acquisition programs (1) In general Not later than February 1, 2020, each Service Acquisition Executive shall recommend to the Secretary of Defense at least one major defense acquisition program for a pilot program to include tailored measures to streamline the entire milestone decision process, with the results evaluated and reported for potential wider use. (2) Elements Each pilot program selected pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: (A) Delineating the appropriate information needed to support milestone decisions, assuring program accountability and oversight, which should be based on the business case principles needed for well-informed milestone decisions, including user-defined requirements, reasonable acquisition and life-cycle cost estimates, and a knowledge-based acquisition plan for maturing technologies, stabilizing the program design, and ensuring key manufacturing processes are in control. (B) Developing an efficient process for providing this information to the milestone decision authority by— (i) minimizing any reviews between the program office and the different functional staff offices within each chain of command level; and (ii) establishing frequent, regular interaction between the program office and milestone decision makers, in lieu of documentation reviews, to help expedite the process. (b) Briefing Not later than May 1, 2020, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall provide to the congressional defense committees an informal briefing detailing— (1) the acquisition programs selected pursuant to subsection (a); (2) the associated action plans, including timelines, for each program; and (3) the manner in which each program conforms to the requirements set forth in subsection (a)(2). 809. Documentation of market research related to commercial item determinations (a) In general Section 2377(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5); and (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following new paragraph: (4) The head of an agency shall document the results of market research in a manner appropriate to the size and complexity of the acquisition. . (b) Conforming amendment related to prospective amendment Section 836(d)(3)(C)(ii) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 in paragraph (4) in paragraph (5) 810. Modification to small purchase threshold exception to sourcing requirements for certain articles Subsection (h) of section 2533a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (h) Exception for small purchases Subsection (a) does not apply to purchases for amounts not greater than $150,000. A proposed purchase or contract for an amount greater than $150,000 may not be divided into several purchases or contracts for lesser amounts in order to qualify for this exception. On October 1 of each year evenly divisible by 5, the Secretary of Defense may adjust the dollar threshold in this subsection based on changes in the Consumer Price Index. The Secretary shall publish notice of any such adjustment in the Federal Register, and the new price threshold shall take effect on the date of publication. . B Provisions relating to major defense acquisition programs 821. Naval vessel certification required before Milestone B approval Section 2366b(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (3)(O), by striking ; and (2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (5) in the case of a naval vessel program, certifies compliance with the requirements of section 8669b of this title. . C Industrial base matters 831. Modernization of acquisition processes to ensure integrity of industrial base (a) Digitization and modernization The Secretary of Defense shall streamline and digitize the existing Department of Defense approach for identifying and mitigating risks to the defense industrial base across the acquisition process, creating a continuous model that uses digital tools, technologies, and approaches designed to ensure the accessibility of data to key decision-makers in the Department. (b) Analytical framework (1) In general The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in coordination with the Defense Security Service (or successor entity) and other organizations as appropriate, shall develop an analytical framework for risk mitigation across the acquisition process. (2) Elements The analytical framework required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: (A) Characterization and monitoring of supply chain risks, including— (i) material sources and fragility; (ii) counterfeit parts; (iii) cybersecurity of contractors; (iv) vendor vetting in contingency or operational environments; and (v) other risk areas as determined appropriate. (B) Characterization and monitoring of risks posed by contractor behavior that constitute violations of laws or regulations, including those relating to— (i) fraud; (ii) ownership structures; (iii) trafficking in persons; (iv) workers’ health and safety; (v) affiliation with the enemy; and (vi) other risk areas as deemed appropriate. (C) Characterization of the Department’s acquisition processes and procedures, including— (i) market research; (ii) responsibility determinations, including consideration of the need for special standards of responsibility to address the risks described in subparagraphs (A) and (B); (iii) facilities clearances; (iv) contract requirements definition and technical evaluation; (v) contract awards and contractor mobilization; (vi) contractor mobilization to include hiring, training, and establishing facilities; (vii) contract administration, contract management, and oversight; (viii) contract audit for closeout; (ix) contractor business system reviews; and (x) other relevant processes and procedures. (D) Characterization and monitoring of the health and activities of the defense industrial base, including those relating to— (i) balance sheets, revenues, profitability, and debt; (ii) investment, innovation, and technological and manufacturing sophistication; (iii) finances, access to capital markets, and cost of raising capital within those markets; (iv) corporate governance, leadership, and culture of performance; and (v) history of performance on past Department of Defense and government contracts. (c) Roles and responsibilities The Secretary of Defense shall designate the roles and responsibilities of organizations and individuals to execute activities under this section, including— (1) the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, including the Office of Defense Pricing and Contracting and the Office of Industrial Policy; (2) Service Acquisition Executives; (3) program offices and procuring contracting officers; (4) administrative contracting officers within the Defense Contract Management Agency and the Supervisor of Shipbuilding; (5) the Defense Security Service and the Defense Counterintelligence Security Agency; (6) the Defense Contract Audit Agency; (7) departments, agencies, or activities which own or operate systems containing data relevant to Department of Defense contractors; (8) the Under Secretary for Research and Engineering; and (9) other relevant organizations and individuals. (d) Enabling data, tools, and systems (1) Assessment of existing data sources, systems, and tools (A) In general The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in consultation with the Chief Data Officer of the Department of Defense, and the Defense Security Service (or successor entity), shall assess the extent to which existing systems of record relevant to risk assessments and contracting are producing, exposing, and timely maintaining valid and reliable data for the purposes of the Department’s continuous assessment and mitigation of risks in the defense industrial base. (B) Elements The assessment required under subparagraph (A) shall include the following elements: (i) Identification of the necessary source data, to include data from contractors, intelligence and security activities, program offices, and commercial research entities. (ii) A description of the modern data infrastructure, tools, and applications and what changes would improve the effectiveness and efficiency of mitigating the risks described in subsection (b)(2). (iii) An assessment of the following systems owned or operated outside of the Department of Defense: (I) The Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). (II) The System for Award Management (SAM). (III) The Federal Procurement Data System–Next Generation (FPDS-NG). (iv) An assessment of systems owned or operated by the Department of Defense, including the Defense Security Service (or successor entity) and other defense agencies and field activities used to capture and analyze the performance of vendors and contractors. (2) Modernization of data collection, exposure, and analysis methods Based on the findings pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall develop a unified set of activities to modernize the systems of record, data sources and collection methods, and data exposure mechanisms. The unified set of activities should feature— (A) the ability to continuously collect data on, assess, and mitigate risks; (B) data analytics and business intelligence tools and methods; and (C) continuous development and continuous delivery of secure software to implement the activities. (e) Reports (1) Initial report Not later than November 15, 2019, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on actions taken pursuant to this section, including recommendations for any further authorities or legislation. (2) Second report Not later than April 15, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on actions taken pursuant to this section, including recommendations for any further legislation. (f) Comptroller General reviews (1) Briefing Not later than February 15, 2020, the Comptroller General of the United States shall brief the congressional defense committees on Department of Defense efforts over the previous 5 years to continuously assess and mitigate risks to the defense industrial base across the acquisition process, and a summary of current and planned efforts. (2) Annual assessments Not later than June 15, 2020, and annually thereafter, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees an assessment of Department of Defense progress in implementing the framework required under subsection (b). 832. Assessment of precision-guided missiles for reliance on foreign-made microelectronic components (a) In general Not later than August 31, 2020, the Secretary of the Air Force shall brief the congressional defense committees on the findings of an assessment of the Air Force's precision-guided missiles for reliance on foreign-made microelectronic components. (b) Elements The assessment required under subsection (a) shall— (1) consider certain risks such as— (A) where microelectronic components for all of the Air Force's precision-guided missiles currently in production were made; (B) the contract tier level of the microelectronic components supplier; and (C) which of the microelectronic components are cyber security concerns; and (2) identify mitigation strategies. 833. Mitigating risks related to foreign ownership, control, or influence of Department of Defense contractors or subcontractors (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Beneficial owner; beneficial ownership The terms beneficial owner beneficial ownership (2) Company The term company (3) Covered contractor or subcontractor The term covered contractor or subcontractor (4) Foreign ownership, control, or influence; FOCI The terms foreign ownership, control, or influence FOCI (b) Improved assessment and mitigation of risks related to foreign ownership, control, or influence (1) In general In developing and implementing the analytical framework for mitigating risk relating to ownership structures, as required by section 831(b)(2)(B)(ii), the Secretary of Defense shall improve the process and procedures for the assessment and mitigation of risks related to foreign ownership, control, or influence (FOCI) of contractors and subcontractors doing business with the Department of Defense. (2) Elements The process and procedures for the assessment and mitigation of risk relating to ownership structures referred to in paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: (A) Assessment of foci (i) A requirement for covered contractors and subcontractors to disclose to the Defense Security Service, or its successor organization, their beneficial ownership and whether they are under FOCI. (ii) A requirement to update such disclosures when significant changes occur to information previously provided, consistent with or similar to the procedures for updating FOCI information under the National Industrial Security Program. (iii) A requirement for covered contractors and subcontractors determined to be under FOCI to disclose contact information for each of its foreign owners that is a beneficial owner. (iv) A requirement that, at a minimum, the disclosures required by this paragraph be provided at the time the contract or subcontract is awarded, amended, or renewed, but in no case later than one year after the Secretary prescribes regulations to carry out this subsection. (B) Responsibility determination Consistent with section 831(b)(2)(C)(ii), consideration of FOCI risks as part of responsibility determinations, including— (i) whether to establish a special standard of responsibility relating to FOCI risks for covered contractors or subcontractors, and the extent to which the policies and procedures consistent with or similar to those relating to FOCI under the National Industrial Security Program shall be applied to covered contractors or subcontractors; (ii) procedures for contracting officers making responsibility determinations regarding whether covered contractors and subcontractors may be under foreign ownership, control, or influence and for determining whether there is reason to believe that such foreign ownership, control, or influence would pose a risk to national security or potential risk of compromise because of sensitive data, systems, or processes, such as personally identifiable information, cybersecurity, or national security systems involved with the contract or subcontract; and (iii) modification of policies, directives, and practices to provide that an assessment that a covered contractor or subcontractor is under FOCI may be a sufficient basis for a contracting officer to determine that a contractor or subcontractor is not responsible. (C) Contract requirements, administration, and oversight relating to foci (i) Requirements for contract clauses providing for and enforcing disclosures related to changes in FOCI during performance of the contract, consistent with subparagraph (A), and necessitating the effective mitigation of risks related to FOCI throughout the duration of the contract or subcontract. (ii) Pursuant to section 831(c), designation of the appropriate Department of Defense official responsible to approve and to take actions relating to award, modification, termination of a contract, or direction to modify or terminate a subcontract due to an assessment by the Defense Security Service, or its successor organization, that a covered contractor or subcontractor under FOCI poses a risk to national security or potential risk of compromise. (iii) A requirement for the provision of additional information regarding beneficial ownership and control of any covered contractor or subcontractor on the contract or subcontract. (iv) Other measures as necessary to be consistent with other relevant practices, policies, regulations, and actions, including those under the National Industrial Security Program. (c) Applicability to contracts and subcontracts for commercial products and services and other forms of acquisition agreements (1) Commercial products and services The disclosure requirements under subsection (b) shall not apply to a contract or subcontract for commercial products or services, unless a designated senior official specifically requires the disclosures described in such subparagraphs with respect to the contract or subcontract based on a determination by the designated senior official that the contract or subcontract involves a risk to national security or potential risk of compromise because of sensitive data, systems, or processes, such as personally identifiable information, cybersecurity, or national security systems. (2) Research and development and procurement activities The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the requirements of this section are applied to research and development and procurement activities, including for the delivery of services, established through any means including those under section 2358(b) of title 10, United States Code. (d) Availability of resources The Secretary shall ensure that sufficient resources, including subject matter expertise, are allocated to execute the functions necessary to carry out this section, including the assessment, mitigation, contract administration, and oversight functions. (e) Reporting requirements and limited availability of beneficial ownership data (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a process to update systems of record to improve the assessment and mitigation of risks associated with FOCI through the inclusion and updating of all appropriate associated uniquely identifying information about the contracts and contractors and subcontracts and subcontractors in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), administered by the General Services Administration, and the Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) database, administered by the Defense Logistics Agency. (2) Limited availability of information The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the information required to be disclosed pursuant to this subsection is— (A) not made public; (B) made available via the FAPIIS and CAGE databases; and (C) made available to appropriate government departments or agencies. 834. Extension and revisions to Never Contract With the Enemy (a) Extension Section 841(n) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 ( 10 U.S.C. 2302 December 31, 2021 December 31, 2023 (b) Expansion of program Section 841(a) of such Act is amended— (1) in the heading, by striking Identification of persons and entities Program (2) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking establish in establish a program to mitigate threats posed by vendors supporting operations outside the United States. The program shall use available intelligence to identify persons and entities that— (3) in paragraph (1), by striking ; or (4) in paragraph (2), by striking the period and inserting a semicolon; and (5) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (3) directly or indirectly support a covered person or entity or otherwise pose a force protection risk to personnel of the United States or coalition forces; or (4) pose an unacceptable national security risk. . (c) Inclusion of all contracts Sections 841 and 842 of such Act are further amended by striking covered contract contract (d) Inclusion of all combatant commands Sections 841 and 842 of such Act are further amended by striking covered combatant command combatant command (e) Covered person or entity Section 843(6) of such Act is amended to read as follows: (6) Covered person or entity The term covered person or entity (A) engaging in acts of violence against personnel of the United States or coalition forces; (B) providing financing, logistics, training, or intelligence to a person described in subparagraph (A); (C) engaging in foreign intelligence activities against the United States or against coalition forces; (D) engaging in transnational organized crime or criminal activities; or (E) engaging in other activities that present a direct or indirect risk to the national security of the United States or coalition forces. . (f) Delegation authority of combatant commander (1) Use of designees Sections 841 and 842 of such Act are further amended by striking specified deputies designee (2) Removal of limitations on delegation Section 841 of such Act is further amended by striking subsection (g). (g) Authorities To terminate, void, and restrict Section 841(c) of such Act is further amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) by inserting to a person or entity concerned (B) by striking the contract the person or entity has been identified under the program established under subsection (a). (2) in paragraph (2), by striking has failed has been identified under the program established under subsection (a). (3) in paragraph (3), by striking the contract the contractor, or the recipient of the grant or cooperative agreement, has been identified under the program established under subsection (a). (h) Contract clause Section 841(d)(2)(B) of such Act is amended by inserting and restrict future award to any contractor, or recipient of a grant or cooperative agreement, that has been identified under the program established under subsection (a) subsection (c) (i) Participation of Secretary of State Section 841 of such Act is further amended— (1) in subsection (a) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking in consultation with (2) in subsection (f)(1), by striking in consultation with (j) Sharing of information on supporters of the enemy Section 841(h)(1) of such Act is further amended by striking may be providing or entity have been identified under the program established under subsection (a) (k) Inapplicability to certain contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements Section 841(j) of such Act is amended by striking contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement that is performed entirely inside the United States unless the recipient of such contract, grant, or cooperative agreement is a foreign entity. (l) Construction with other authorities Section 841 of such Act is further amended— (1) in subsection (l), by striking Except as provided in subsection (m), the The (2) by striking subsection (m). (m) Additional access to records Section 842 of such Act is further amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking , except as provided under subsection (c)(1), (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ensure that funds support the program established under section 841(a). (C) in paragraph (3), by striking that funds that the examination of such records will support the program established under section 841(a). (D) by striking paragraph (4); and (2) by striking subsection (c). (n) Reports Subtitle E of title VIII of such Act ( 10 U.S.C. 2302 (1) in section 841(i)(1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 2016, 2017, and 2018 2016 through 2023 (2) in section 842(b)(1), by striking 2016, 2017, and 2018 2016 through 2023 (o) Technical and conforming amendments (1) Section heading The heading of section 841 of such Act is amended by striking Providing funds to Supporting (2) Redesignations Section 841 of such Act is further amended by redesignating subsections (h) through (l) and (n) (as amended by subsections (a) through (n) of this section) as subsections (g) through (l), respectively. (3) Definitions Section 843 of such Act is amended by striking paragraphs (2) through (5) and redesignating paragraphs (6) through (9) as paragraphs (2) through (5), respectively. D Small Business Matters 841. Reauthorization and improvement of Department of Defense Mentor-Protégé Program (a) Permanent authorization Section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 ( Public Law 101–510 10 U.S.C. 2302 (b) Office of Small Business Programs oversight Section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 ( Public Law 101–510 10 U.S.C. 2302 (1) by redesignating subsection (n) as subsection (o); and (2) by inserting after subsection (m) the following new subsection: (n) Establishment of performance goals and periodic reviews The Office of Small Business Programs of the Department of Defense shall— (1) establish performance goals consistent with the stated purpose of the Mentor-Protégé Program and outcome-based metrics to measure progress in meeting those goals; and (2) submit to the congressional defense committees, not later than February 1, 2020, a report on progress made toward implementing these performance goals and metrics, based on periodic reviews of the procedures used to approve mentor-protégé agreements. . (c) Modification of disadvantaged small business concern definition Subsection (o)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 ( Public Law 101–510 10 U.S.C. 2302 has less than half the size standard corresponding to its primary North American Industry Classification System code is not more than the size standard corresponding to its primary North American Industry Classification System code (d) Removal of pilot program references Section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 ( Public Law 101–510 10 U.S.C. 2302 (1) in the subsection heading for subsection (a), by striking pilot (2) by striking pilot (e) Independent report on program effectiveness (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Defense Business Board to submit to the congressional defense committees a report evaluating the effectiveness of the Mentor-Protégé Program established under section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 ( Public Law 101–510 10 U.S.C. 2302 (2) Congressional defense committees defined In this subsection, the term congressional defense committees 842. Modification of justification and approval requirement for certain Department of Defense contracts (a) Modification of justification and approval requirement Notwithstanding section 811 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( Public Law 111–84 (1) no justification and approval is required under such section for a sole-source contract awarded by the Department of Defense in a covered procurement for an amount not exceeding $100,000,000; and (2) for purposes of subsections (a)(2) and (c)(3)(A) of such section, the appropriate official designated to approve the justification for a sole-source contract awarded by the Department of Defense in a covered procurement exceeding $100,000,000 is the official designated in section 2304(f)(1)(B)(ii) of title 10, United States Code. (b) Guidance Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue guidance to implement the authority under subsection (a). (c) Comptroller General review (1) Data tracking and collection The Department of Defense shall track the use of the authority provided pursuant to subsection (a) and make the data available to the Comptroller General for purposes of the report required under paragraph (2). (2) Report Not later than February 1, 2022, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit a report to the congressional defense committees on the use of the authority provided pursuant to subsection (a) through the end of fiscal year 2021. E Provisions related to software-Driven capabilities 851. Improved management of information technology and cyberspace investments (a) Improved management (1) In general The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall work with the Chief Data Officer of the Department of Defense to optimize the Department's process for accounting for, managing, and reporting its information technology and cyberspace investments. The optimization should include alternative methods of presenting budget justification materials to the public and congressional staff to more accurately communicate when, how, and with what frequency capability is delivered to end users, in accordance with best practices for managing and reporting on information technology investments. (2) Briefing Not later than February 3, 2020, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall brief the congressional defense committees on the process optimization undertaken pursuant to paragraph (1), including any recommendations for legislation. (b) Delivery of information technology budget The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the Department of Defense budget request for information technology not later than 15 days after the submittal to Congress of the budget of the President for a fiscal year pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code. 852. Special pathways for rapid acquisition of software applications and upgrades (a) Guidance required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish guidance authorizing the use of special pathways for the rapid acquisition of software applications and upgrades that are intended to be fielded within one year. (b) Software acquisition pathways (1) Use of proven technologies and solutions The guidance required by subsection (a) shall provide for the use of proven technologies and solutions to continuously engineer and deliver capabilities in software. (2) Objectives The objectives of using the acquisition authority under this section shall be to begin the engineering of new capabilities quickly, to demonstrate viability and effectiveness of those capabilities in operation, and to continue updating and delivering new capabilities iteratively afterwards. (3) Treatment not as acquisition program An acquisition using the authority under this section shall not be treated as an acquisition program for the purpose of section 2430 of title 10, United States Code, or Department of Defense Directive 5000.01 without the specific direction of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment or a Senior Acquisition Executive. (4) Pathways The guidance shall provide for the following two rapid acquisition pathways: (A) Applications The applications software acquisition pathway shall provide for the use of rapid development and implementation of applications and other software and software improvements running on commercial commodity hardware (including modified hardware) operated by the Department of Defense. (B) Embedded systems The embedded systems software acquisition pathway shall provide for the rapid development and insertion of upgrades and improvements for software embedded in weapon systems and other military-unique hardware systems. (c) Expedited process (1) In general The guidance required by subsection (a) shall provide for a streamlined and coordinated requirements, budget, and acquisition process that results in the rapid fielding of software applications and software upgrades to embedded systems in a period of not more than one year from the time that the process is initiated. It shall also require the collection of data on the version fielded and continuous engagement with the users of that software, so as to enable engineering and delivery of additional versions in periods of not more than one year each. (2) Expedited software requirements process (A) Inapplicability of existing guidance Software acquisitions conducted under the authority of this provision shall not be subject to the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Manual and Department of Defense Directive 5000.01, except to the extent specifically provided in the guidance required under subsection (a) or by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment or a Senior Acquisition Executive. (B) Requirements The guidance required by subsection (a) shall provide the following with respect to requirements: (i) Requirements for covered acquisitions are developed on an iterative basis through engagement with the user community, and the use of user feedback in order to regularly define and set priorities for software requirements and evaluate the software capabilities acquired. (ii) The requirements process begins with the identification of the warfighter or user need, including the rationale for how these software capabilities will support increased lethality and efficiency, and the identification of a relevant user community. (iii) Initial contract requirements are stated in the form of a summary-level list of problems and shortcomings in existing software systems and desired features or capabilities of new or upgraded software systems. (iv) Contract requirements are continuously refined and set in priority order in an evolutionary process through discussions with users that may continue throughout the development and implementation period. (v) Issues related to lifecycle costs and systems interoperability are continuously considered. (vi) Issues of logistics support in cases where the software developer may stop supporting the software system are addressed. (vii) Rapid contracting procedures, to include timeframes for award, contract types, teaming, and options. (viii) Execution processes, including supporting development and test infrastructure, automation and tools, data collection and sharing, the role of developmental and operational testing activities, and key decisionmaking and oversight events, and supporting processes and activities such as independent costing activity, operational demonstration, and performance metrics. (ix) Administrative procedures, including procedures related to the roles and responsibilities of the implementing project or product teams and supporting activities, team selection and staffing process, oversight roles and responsibilities, and appropriate independent technology assessments, testing, and cost estimation, including relevant thresholds or designation criteria. (x) Mechanisms and waivers designed to ensure flexibility in the implementation of the authority, including the use of other transaction authority, broad agency announcements, and other procedures. F Other Matters 861. Notification of Navy procurement production disruptions (a) In general Chapter 137 2339b. Notification of Navy procurement production disruptions (a) Requirement for contractor To provide notice of delays The Secretary of the Navy shall require prime contractors of any Navy procurement program to report within 15 calendar days any stop work order or other manufacturing disruption of 15 calendar days or more, by the prime contractor or any sub-contractor, to the respective program manager and Navy technical authority. (b) Quarterly reports The Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees not later than 15 calendar days after the end of each quarter of a fiscal year a report listing all notifications made pursuant to subsection (a) during the preceding quarter. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 137 section 2339a 2339b. Notification of Navy procurement production disruptions. . 862. Modification to acquisition authority of the Commander of the United States Cyber Command Section 807 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( Public Law 114–92 10 U.S.C. 2224 on new contract efforts may not obligate or expend more than $75,000,000 863. Prohibition on operation or procurement of foreign-made unmanned aircraft systems (a) Prohibition on agency operation or procurement The Secretary of Defense may not operate or enter into or renew a contract for the procurement of— (1) a covered unmanned aircraft system that— (A) is manufactured in a covered foreign country or by an entity domiciled in a covered foreign country; (B) uses flight controllers, radios, data transmission devices, cameras, or gimbals manufactured in a covered foreign country or by an entity domiciled in a covered foreign country; (C) uses a ground control system or operating software developed in a covered foreign country or by an entity domiciled in a covered foreign country; or (D) uses network connectivity or data storage located in or administered by an entity domiciled in a covered foreign country; or (2) a system manufactured in a covered foreign country or by an entity domiciled in a covered foreign country for the detection or identification of covered unmanned aircraft systems. (b) Exemption The Secretary of Defense is exempt from the restriction under subsection (a) if the operation or procurement is for the purposes of— (1) Counter-UAS surrogate testing and training; or (2) intelligence, electronic warfare, and information warfare operations, testing, analysis, and training. (c) Waiver The Secretary of Defense may waive the restriction under subsection (a) on a case by case basis by certifying in writing to the congressional defense committees that the operation or procurement is required in the national interest of the United States. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered foreign country The term covered foreign country (2) Covered unmanned aircraft system The term covered unmanned aircraft system 864. Prohibition on contracting with persons that have business operations with the Maduro regime (a) Prohibition Except as provided under subsections (c), (d), and (e), the Department of Defense may not enter into a contract for the procurement of goods or services with any person that has business operations with an authority of the Government of Venezuela that is not recognized as the legitimate Government of Venezuela by the United States Government. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) Business operations The term business operations (2) Government of Venezuela (A) The term Government of Venezuela (B) For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term agency or instrumentality of the Government of Venezuela a foreign state Venezuela (3) Person The term person (A) a natural person, corporation, company, business association, partnership, society, trust, or any other nongovernmental entity, organization, or group; (B) any governmental entity or instrumentality of a government, including a multilateral development institution (as defined in section 1701(c)(3) of the International Financial Institutions Act ( 22 U.S.C. 262r(c)(3) (C) any successor, subunit, parent entity, or subsidiary of, or any entity under common ownership or control with, any entity described in subparagraph (A) or (B). (c) Exceptions (1) In general The prohibition under subsection (a) does not apply to a contract that the Secretary of Defense determines— (A) is necessary— (i) for purposes of providing humanitarian assistance to the people of Venezuela; (ii) for purposes of providing disaster relief and other urgent life-saving measures; (iii) to carry out noncombatant evacuations; or (iv) to carry out stabilization activities; or (B) is vital to the national security interests of the United States. (2) Notification requirement The Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees of any contract entered into on the basis of an exception provided for under paragraph (1). (d) Office of foreign assets control licenses The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to a person that has a valid license to operate in Venezuela issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control. (e) American diplomatic mission in Venezuela The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to contracts related to the operation and maintenance of the United States Government’s consular offices and diplomatic posts in Venezuela. (f) Applicability This section shall apply with respect to any contract entered into on or after the date of the enactment of this section. 865. Comptroller General of the United States report on Department of Defense efforts to combat human trafficking through procurement practices (a) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on Department of Defense efforts to combat human trafficking. (b) Elements The report required under subsection (a) shall evaluate— (1) the efforts of the Department of Defense to combat human trafficking in its contracting and supply chain policy, regulation, and practices, to include implementation of title XVII of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 ( Public Law 112–239 (2) the role of the current trafficking in person’s office within the Department of Defense in helping the Department address all forms of human trafficking, and what, if any, improvements should be made to the office; (3) the process used by contract officers to evaluate compliance plans with regards to preventing human trafficking; and (4) how many instances of human trafficking have been reported to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense and the outcome of those cases. (c) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section , the term appropriate congressional committees (1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives. IX Department of Defense Organization and Management A Office of the Secretary of Defense and Related Matters 901. Headquarters activities of the Department of Defense matters (a) Assessment and reform of enterprise business operations Subsection (b) of section 921 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 10 U.S.C. 2222 (b) Assessment and reform of enterprise business operations (1) Periodic assessments and actions Not later than January 1, 2020, and not less frequently than once every five years thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall, acting through the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense— (A) assess enterprise business operations of the Department of Defense across all organizations and elements of the Department; and (B) take or direct the taking of such actions as will minimize the duplication of efforts and maximize efficiency and effectiveness in mission execution. (2) CMO reports Not later than January 1 of every fifth calendar year beginning with January 1, 2025, the Chief Management Officer shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that describes the assessments carried out and the actions taken by the Chief Management Officer, and by other officers or employees of the Department at the direction of the Chief Management Office, under this subsection during the preceding five years, including the following: (A) A description of the metrics for performance relating to minimization of duplication of efforts and maximization of efficiency and effectiveness in mission execution established for applicable organizations and elements of the Department. (B) A certification of any costs avoided or cost savings achieved as a result of such assessments and actions. . (b) Report on military and civilian personnel for the NGB and National Guard Joint Staff Not later than January 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the following: (1) The total number of members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense assigned to the Office of the Chief of the National Guard Bureau and the National Guard Joint Staff. (2) A recommendation for the total number of members and employees required for the Office of the Chief of the National Guard Bureau and the National Guard Joint Staff to execute the missions and functions of the National Guard Bureau and the National Guard Joint Staff. (c) Repeal of superseded limitations The following provisions are repealed: (1) Section 601 of the Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986 ( 10 U.S.C. 194 (2) Section 1111 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( 10 U.S.C. 143 (d) Modification of limitations on number of personnel in OSD and other DoD headquarters (1) OSD Section 143 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) in subsection (a), by striking 3,767 4,000 (B) in subsection (b), by striking , civilian, and detailed personnel and civilian personnel (2) Joint staff (A) In general Section 155(h) of such title is amended— (i) in paragraph (1), by striking 2,069 2,250 (ii) in paragraph (2), by striking 1,500 1,600 (B) Effective date The amendments made by subparagraph (A) shall take effect on December 31, 2019, immediately after the coming into effect of the amendment made by section 903(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 (3) Office of Secretary of the Army Section 7014(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking 3,105 3,250 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking 1,865 1,900 (4) Office of Secretary of the Navy Section 8014(f) of such title is amended— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking 2,866 3,000 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking 1,720 1,800 (5) Office of Secretary of the Air Force Section 9014(f) of such title is amended— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking 2,639 2,750 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking 1,585 1,650 (e) Sunset of reduction in funding for DoD headquarters, administrative, and support activities Section 346 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( 10 U.S.C. 111 (c) Sunset No action is required under this section with respect to any fiscal year after fiscal year 2019. . 902. Responsibility of Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment for Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program (a) In general Section 2411(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking Secretary of Defense acting through the Director of the Defense Logistics Agency Secretary of Defense acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment (b) Authority to pay administrative and other costs Section 2417 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking Director of the Defense Logistics Agency Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment 903. Return to Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense of responsibility for business systems and related matters (a) Return of responsibility (1) In general Section 142(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking systems and (2) Conforming amendments to CMO authorities Section 132a(b) of such title is amended— (A) in paragraph (2), by striking performance measurement and management, and business information technology management and improvement activities and programs and performance measurement and management activities and programs (B) by striking paragraphs (4) and (5); and (C) by redesignating paragraphs (6) and (7) as paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively. (b) Chief Data Officer responsibility for DoD data sets (1) In general In addition to any other functions and responsibilities specified in section 3520(c) of title 44, United States, Code, the Chief Data Officer of the Department of Defense shall also be the official in the Department of Defense with principal responsibility for providing for the availability of common, usable, Defense-wide data sets. (2) Access to all DoD data In order to carry out the responsibility specified in paragraph (1), the Chief Data Officer shall have access to all Department of Defense data, including data in connection with warfighting missions and back-office data. (3) Responsible to CIO The Chief Data Officer shall report directly to the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense in the performance of the responsibility specified in paragraph (1). (4) Report Not later than December 1, 2019, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth such recommendations for legislative or administrative action as the Secretary considers appropriate to carry out this subsection. 904. Senior Military Advisor for Cyber Policy and Deputy Principal Cyber Advisor (a) Advisor (1) In general The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy shall, acting through the Joint Staff, designate an officer within the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy to serve within that Office as the Senior Military Advisor for Cyber Policy, and concurrently, as the Deputy Principal Cyber Advisor. (2) Officers eligible for designation The officer designated pursuant to this subsection shall be designated from among commissioned regular officers of the Armed Forces in a general or flag officer grade who are qualified for designation (3) Grade The officer designated pursuant to this subsection shall have the grade of major general or rear admiral while serving in that position, without vacating the officer's permanent grade. (b) Scope of positions (1) In general The officer designated pursuant to subsection (a) is each of the following: (A) The Senior Military Advisor for Cyber Policy to the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. (B) The Deputy Principal Cyber Advisor to the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. (2) Direction and control and reporting In carrying out duties under this section, the officer designed pursuant to subsection (a) shall be subject to the authority, direction, and control of, and shall report directly to, the following: (A) The Under Secretary with respect to Senior Military Advisor for Cyber Policy duties. (B) The Principal Cyber Advisor with respect to Deputy Principal Cyber Advisor duties. (c) Duties (1) Duties as Senior Military Advisor for Cyber Policy The duties of the officer designated pursuant to subsection (a) as Senior Military Advisor for Cyber Policy are as follows: (A) To serve as the principal uniformed military advisor on military cyber forces and activities to the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. (B) To assess and advise the Under Secretary on aspects of policy relating to military cyberspace operations, resources, personnel, cyber force readiness, cyber workforce development, and defense of Department of Defense networks. (C) To advocate, in consultation with the Joint Staff, and senior officers of the Armed Forces and the combatant commands, for consideration of military issues within the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, including coordination and synchronization of Department cyber forces and activities. (D) To maintain open lines of communication between the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, senior civilian leaders within the Office of the Under Secretary, and senior officers on the Joint Staff, the Armed Forces, and the combatant commands on cyber matters, and to ensure that military leaders are informed on cyber policy decisions. (2) Duties as Deputy Principal Cyber Advisor The duties of the officer designated pursuant to subsection (a) as Deputy Principal Cyber Advisor are as follows: (A) To synchronize, coordinate, and oversee implementation of the Cyber Strategy of the Department of Defense and other relevant policy and planning. (B) To advise the Secretary of Defense on cyber programs, projects, and activities of the Department, including with respect to policy, training, resources, personnel, manpower, and acquisitions and technology. (C) To oversee implementation of Department policy and operational directives on cyber programs, projects, and activities, including with respect to resources, personnel, manpower, and acquisitions and technology. (D) To assist in the overall supervision of Department cyber activities relating to offensive missions. (E) To assist in the overall supervision of Department defensive cyber operations, including activities of component-level cybersecurity service providers and the integration of such activities with activities of the Cyber Mission Force. (F) To advise senior leadership of the Department on, and advocate for, investment in capabilities to execute Department missions in and through cyberspace. (G) To identify shortfalls in capabilities to conduct Department missions in and through cyberspace, and make recommendations on addressing such shortfalls in the Program Budget Review process. (H) To coordinate and consult with stakeholders in the cyberspace domain across the Department in order to identify other issues on cyberspace for the attention of senior leadership of the Department. (I) On behalf of the Principal Cyber Advisor, to lead the cross-functional team established pursuant to 932(c)(3) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 ( 10 U.S.C. 2224 905. Limitation on transfer of Strategic Capabilities Office (a) Limitation The Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering may not transfer the Strategic Capabilities Office or change the reporting structure of the Office, as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act, until the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Chief Management Officer and the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and in consultation with the United States Indo-Pacific, Europe, and Special Operations Command, submits the report required by subsection (b)(1). (b) Report (1) In general The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that evaluates the following options for transferring the Office: (A) Transferring the Office so that the Director of the Office reports directly to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. (B) Maintaining the arrangement in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act such that the Director continues to report to the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. (C) Transferring the Office to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. (D) Such other options as the Under Secretary may identify. (2) Contents The report submitted under paragraph (1) shall include, for each option evaluated under such paragraph, an evaluation of whether the option considered will provide for— (A) responding to the critical needs of combatant commanders; (B) augmentation of cross-Department of Defense efforts with respect to developing strategic capabilities; (C) developing new and innovative ways to counter advanced threats; (D) providing sound technical and program management for activities of the Strategic Capabilities Office; (E) coordinating appropriately with other research and technology development activities of the Department; and (F) partnering with and responding to senior leadership across the Department. B Organization and Management of Other Department of Defense Offices and Elements 911. Assistant Secretaries of the military departments for Energy, Installations, and Environment (a) Assistant Secretary of the Army Section 7016(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (6) One of the Assistant Secretaries shall be the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Energy, Installations, and Environment. . (b) Assistant Secretary of the Navy Section 8016(b) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (5) One of the Assistant Secretaries shall be the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Energy, Installations, and Environment. . (c) Assistant Secretary of the Air Force Section 9016(b) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (5) One of the Assistant Secretaries shall be the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Energy, Installations, and Environment. . 912. Repeal of conditional designation of Explosive Ordnance Disposal Corps as a basic branch of the Army Section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 C Other Matters 921. Exclusion from limitations on personnel in the Office of the Secretary of Defense and Department of Defense headquarters of fellows appointed under the John S. McCain Defense Fellows Program Section 932(f)(3) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 An individual appointed pursuant to this paragraph shall not count against the limitation on the number of Office of the Secretary of Defense personnel in section 143 of title 10, United States Code, or any similar limitation in law on the number of personnel in headquarters of the Department that would otherwise apply to the office or headquarters to which appointed. 922. Report on resources to implement the civilian casualty policy of the Department of Defense Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report, in unclassified form, on the resources necessary over the period of the future-years defense plan for fiscal year 2020 under section 221 of title United States Code, to fulfill the requirements of section 936 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 10 U.S.C. 134 X General Provisions A Financial Matters 1001. General transfer authority (a) Authority To transfer authorizations (1) Authority Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this division for fiscal year 2020 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred. (2) Limitation Except as provided in paragraph (3), the total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this section may not exceed $4,000,000,000. (3) Exception for transfers between military personnel authorizations A transfer of funds between military personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be counted toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2). (b) Limitations The authority provided by subsection (a) to transfer authorizations— (1) may only be used to provide authority for items that have a higher priority than the items from which authority is transferred; and (2) may not be used to provide authority for an item that has been denied authorization by Congress. (c) Effect on authorization amounts A transfer made from one account to another under the authority of this section shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount transferred. (d) Notice to Congress The Secretary shall promptly notify Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a). 1002. Modification of required elements of annual reports on emergency and extraordinary expenses of the Department of Defense Paragraph (2) of section 127(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (2) Each report submitted under paragraph (1) shall include, for each individual expenditure covered by such report in an amount in excess of $20,000, the following: (A) A detailed description of the purpose of such expenditure. (B) The amount of such expenditure. (C) An identification of the approving authority for such expenditure. (D) A justification why other authorities available to the Department could not be used for such expenditure. (E) Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate. . 1003. Inclusion of military construction projects in annual reports on unfunded priorities of the Armed Forces and the combatant commands (a) Inclusion of military construction projects among unfunded priorities Subsection (d) of section 222a of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by inserting , including a military construction project, program, activity, or mission requirement (b) Order of urgency of priority Paragraph (2) of subsection (c) of such section is amended to read as follows: (2) Prioritization of priorities Each report shall present the unfunded priorities covered by such report as follows: (A) In overall order of urgency of priority. (B) In overall order of urgency of priority among unfunded priorities (other than military construction projects). (C) In overall order of urgency of priority among military construction projects. . 1004. Prohibition on delegation of responsibility for submittal to Congress of Out-Year Unconstrained Total Munitions Requirements and Out-Year Inventory numbers Section 222c of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking subsection (b) subsection (c) (2) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), and (d) as subsections (c), (d), and (e), respectively; (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): (b) Prohibition on delegation of submittal responsibility The responsibility of the chief of staff of an armed force in subsection (a) to submit a report may not be delegated outside the armed force concerned. ; and (4) in subsection (c), as redesignated by paragraph (2), by striking subsection (c) subsection (d) 1005. Element in annual reports on the Financial Improvement and Audit Remediation Plan on activities with respect to classified programs Section 240b(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subparagraph (B), by adding at the end the following new clause: (ix) A description of audit activities and results for classified programs, including a description of the use of procedures and requirements to prevent unauthorized exposure of classified information in such activities. ; and (2) in subparagraph (C)(i), by inserting or (ix) clause (vii) 1006. Modification of semiannual briefings on the consolidated corrective action plan of the Department of Defense for financial management information (a) In general Paragraph (2) of section 240b(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as following: (2) Semiannual briefings (A) In general Not later than February 28 and September 30 each year, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) and the comptrollers of the military departments shall provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees on the status of the consolidated corrective action plan referred to in paragraph (1)(B)(i) as of the end of the most recent calendar half-year ending before such briefing. (B) Elements Each briefing under subparagraph (A) shall include the following: (i) The absolute number, and the percentage, of personnel performing the amount of auditing or audit remediation services being performed by professionals meeting the qualifications described in section 240d(b) of this title as of the last day of the calendar half-year covered by such briefing. (ii) With respect to each finding and recommendation issued in connection with the audit of the financial statements of a department, agency, component, or other element of the Department of Defense, or the Department of Defense as a whole, that was received by the Department during the calendar half-year covered by such briefing, each of the following: (I) A description of the manner in which the corrective action plan of such department, agency, component, or element and the corrective action plan of the Department as a whole, or the corrective action plan of the Department as a whole (in the case of a finding or recommendation regarding the Department as a whole), has been modified in order to incorporate such finding or recommendation into such plans or plan. (II) An identification of the processes, systems, procedures, and technologies required to implement such corrective action plans or plan, as so modified. (III) A determination of the funds required to procure, obtain, or otherwise implement each process, system, and technology identified pursuant to subclause (II). (IV) An identification the manner in which such corrective action plans or plan, as so modified, support the National Defense Strategy (NDS) of the United States. . (b) Technical amendment Paragraph (1)(B)(i) of such section is amended by striking section 253a section 240c (c) Effective date The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to calender half-years that end on or after that date. 1007. Update of authorities and renaming of Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund (a) Renaming as Account (1) In general Section 1705 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) in subsection (a), by striking the Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund Fund the Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Account Account (B) by striking Fund Account (2) Conforming and clerical amendments (A) Section heading The heading of such section is amended to read as follows: 1705. Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Account . (B) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of chapter 87 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 1705 and inserting the following new item: 1705. Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Account. . (b) Management Such section is further amended by striking Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment (c) Appropriations as sole elements of Account Subsection (d) of such section is amended to read as follows: (d) Elements The Account shall consist of amounts appropriated to the Account by law. . (d) Availability of amounts in Account Subsection (e)(6) of such section is amended by striking credited to the Fund appropriated to the Account pursuant to subsection (d) shall remain available for expenditure for the fiscal year in which appropriated and the succeeding fiscal year. (e) Effective date (1) In general The amendments made by this section shall take effect on October 1, 2019, and shall apply with respect to fiscal years that begin on or after that date. (2) Duration of availability of previously deposited funds Nothing in the amendments made by this section shall modify the duration of availability of amounts in the Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund that were appropriated or credited to, or deposited, in the Fund, before October 1, 2019, as provided for in section 1705(e)(6) of title 10, United States Code, as in effect on the day before such date. B Counterdrug Activities 1011. Modification of authority to support a unified counterdrug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia Section 1021(a)(1) of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 ( Public Law 108–375 Public Law 115–91 organizations designated as terrorist organizations or other illegally armed groups that the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, determines pose a threat to the national security interests of the United States. 1012. Two-year extension of authority for joint task forces to provide support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities Section 1022(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 ( 10 U.S.C. 271 2020 2022 C Naval Vessels and Shipyards 1016. Modification of authority to purchase vessels using funds in National Defense Sealift Fund (a) In general Section 2218(f)(3)(E) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in clause (i), by striking ten new sealift vessels ten new vessels that are sealift vessels, auxiliary vessels, or a combination of such vessels (2) in clause (ii), by striking sealift (b) Effective date The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on October 1, 2019, and shall apply with respect to fiscal years beginning on or after that date. 1017. Senior Technical Authority for each naval vessel class (a) Senior Technical Authority for each class required Chapter 863 section 8669a 8669b. Senior Technical Authority for each naval vessel class (a) Senior Technical Authority (1) Designation for each vessel class required The Secretary of the Navy shall designate, in writing, a Senior Technical Authority for each class of naval vessels as follows: (A) In the case of a class of vessels which has received Milestone A approval, an approval to enter into technology maturation and risk reduction, or an approval to enter into a subsequent Department of Defense or Department of the Navy acquisition phase as of the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, not later than 30 days after such date of enactment. (B) In the case of any class of vessels which has not received any approval described in subparagraph (A) as of such date of enactment, at or before the first of such approvals. (2) Prohibition on delegation The Secretary may not delegate designations under paragraph (1). (3) Individuals eligible for designation Each individual designated as a Senior Technical Authority under paragraph (1) shall be an employee of the Navy in the Senior Executive Service in an organization of the Navy that— (A) possesses the technical expertise required to carry out the responsibilities specified in subsection (b); and (B) operates independently of chains-of-command for acquisition program management. (4) Term Each Senior Technical Authority shall be designated for a term, not fewer than six years, specified by the Secretary at the time of designation. (5) Removal An individual may be removed involuntarily from designation as a Senior Technical Authority only by the Secretary. Not later than 15 days after the involuntary removal of an individual from designation as a Senior Technical Authority, the Secretary shall notify, in writing, the congressional defense committees of the removal, including the reasons for the removal. (b) Responsibilities and authority Each Senior Technical Authority shall be responsible for, and have the authority to, establish, monitor, and approve technical standards, tools, and processes for the class of naval vessels for which designated under this section in conformance with applicable Department of Defense and Department of the Navy policies, requirements, architectures, and standards. (c) Limitation on obligation of funds on lead vessel in vessel class (1) In general On or after October 1, 2020, funds authorized to be appropriated for Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy or Other Procurement, Navy may not be obligated for the first time on the lead vessel in a class of naval vessels unless the Secretary of the Navy certifies as described in paragraph (2). (2) Certification elements The certification on a class of naval vessels described in this paragraph is a certification containing each of the following: (A) The name of the individual designated as the Senior Technical Authority for such class of vessels, and the qualifications and professional biography of the individual so designated. (B) A description by the Senior Technical Authority of the systems engineering, technology, and ship integration risks for such class of vessels. (C) The designation by the Senior Technical Authority of each critical hull, mechanical, electrical, propulsion, and combat system of such class of vessels, including systems relating to power generation, power distribution, and key operational mission areas. (D) The date on which the Senior Technical Authority approved the systems engineering, engineering development, and land-based engineering and testing plans for such class of vessels. (E) A description by the Senior Technical Authority of the key technical knowledge objectives and demonstrated system performance of each plan approved as described in subparagraph (D). (F) A determination by the Senior Technical Authority that such plans are sufficient to achieve thorough technical knowledge of critical systems of such class of vessels before the start of detail design and construction. (G) A determination by the Senior Technical Authority that actual execution of activities in support of such plans as of the date of the certification have been and continue to be effective and supportive of the acquisition schedule for such class of vessels. (H) A description by the Senior Technical Authority of other technology maturation and risk reduction efforts not included in such plans for such class of vessels taken as of the date of the certification. (I) A certification by the Senior Technical Authority that each critical system covered by subparagraph (C) has been demonstrated through testing of a prototype or identical component in its final form, fit, and function in a realistic environment. (J) A determination by the Secretary that the plans approved as described in subparagraph (D) are fully funded and will be fully funded in the future-years defense program for the fiscal year beginning in the year in which the certification is submitted. (K) A determination by the Secretary that the Senior Technical Authority will approve, in writing, the ship specification for such class of vessels before the request for proposals for detail design, construction, or both, as applicable, is released. (3) Deadline for submittal of certification The certification required by this subsection with respect to a class of naval vessels shall be submitted, in writing, to the congressional defense committees not fewer than 30 days before the Secretary obligates for the first time funds authorized to be appropriated for Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy or Other Procurement, Navy for the lead vessel in such class of naval vessels. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) The term class of naval vessels (A) means any group of similar undersea or surface craft procured with Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy or Other Procurement, Navy funds, including manned, unmanned, and optionally-manned craft; and (B) includes— (i) a substantially new class of craft (including craft procured using new start (ii) a class of craft undergoing a significant incremental change in its existing class (such as a next flight block (2) The term future-years defense program (3) The term Milestone A approval (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 863 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 8669a the following new item: 8669b. Senior Technical Authority for each naval vessel class. . 1018. Permanent authority for sustaining operational readiness of Littoral Combat Ships on extended deployment Section 8680(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subparagraph (D). D Counterterrorism 1021. Extension of prohibition on use of funds for transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States Section 1033 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2020 1022. Extension of prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the United States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba Section 1034(a) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2020 1023. Extension of prohibition on use of funds for transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to certain countries Section 1035 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–232 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2020 1024. Extension of prohibition on use of funds to close or relinquish control of United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba Section 1036 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 Public Law 115–232 or 2019 , 2019, or 2020 1025. Authority to transfer individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States temporarily for emergency or critical medical treatment (a) Temporary transfer for medical treatment Notwithstanding section 1033 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (1) the medical treatment of the individual is necessary to prevent death or imminent significant injury or harm to the health of the individual; (2) the necessary medical treatment is not available to be provided at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, without incurring excessive and unreasonable costs; and (3) the Department of Defense has provided for appropriate security measures for the custody and control of the individual during any period in which the individual is temporarily in the United States under this section. (b) Limitation on exercise of authority The authority of the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a) may be exercised only by the Secretary of Defense or another official of the Department of Defense at the level of Under Secretary of Defense or higher. (c) Conditions of transfer An individual who is temporarily transferred under the authority in subsection (a) shall— (1) while in the United States, remain in the custody and control of the Secretary of Defense at all times; and (2) be returned to United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as soon as feasible after a Department of Defense physician determines, in consultation with the Commander, Joint Task Force-Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, that any necessary follow-up medical care may reasonably be provided the individual at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay. (d) Status while in United States An individual who is temporarily transferred under the authority in subsection (a), while in the United States— (1) shall be deemed at all times and in all respects to be in the uninterrupted custody of the Secretary of Defense, as though the individual remained physically at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; (2) shall not at any time be subject to, and may not apply for or obtain, or be deemed to enjoy, any right, privilege, status, benefit, or eligibility for any benefit under any provision of the immigration laws (as defined in section 101(a)(17) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(17) (3) shall not be permitted to avail himself of any right, privilege, or benefit of any law of the United States beyond those available to individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay; and (4) shall not, as a result of such transfer, have a change in any designation that may have attached to that detainee while detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force ( Public Law 107–40 (e) No cause of action Any decision to transfer or not to transfer an individual made under the authority in subsection (a) shall not give rise to any claim or cause of action. (f) Limitation on judicial review (1) Limitation Except as provided in paragraph (2), no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any claim or action against the United States or its departments, agencies, officers, employees, or agents arising from or relating to any aspect of the detention, transfer, treatment, or conditions of confinement of an individual transferred under this section. (2) Exception for habeas corpus The United States District Court for the District of Columbia shall have exclusive jurisdiction to consider an application for writ of habeas corpus seeking release from custody filed by or on behalf of an individual who is in the United States pursuant to a temporary transfer under the authority in subsection (a). Such jurisdiction shall be limited to that required by the Constitution, and relief shall be only as provided in paragraph (3). In such a proceeding the court may not review, halt, or stay the return of the individual who is the object of the application to United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, pursuant to subsection (c). (3) Relief A court order in a proceeding covered by paragraph (2)— (A) may not order the release of the individual within the United States; and (B) shall be limited to an order of release from custody which, when final, the Secretary of Defense shall implement in accordance with section 1034 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( 10 U.S.C. 801 (g) Notification Whenever a temporary transfer of an individual detained at Guantanamo is made under the authority of subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall notify the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives of the transfer not later than five days after the date on which the transfer is made. (h) Individual detained at Guantanamo defined In this section, the term individual detained at Guantanamo (1) is not a national of the United States (as defined in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22) (2) is— (A) in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense; or (B) otherwise detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay. (i) Applicability This section shall apply to an individual temporarily transferred under the authority in subsection (a) regardless of the status of any pending or completed proceeding or detention on the date of the enactment of this Act. 1026. Chief Medical Officer at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (a) Chief Medical Officer (1) In general There shall be at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, a Chief Medical Officer of United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay (in this section referred to as the Chief Medical Officer (2) Grade The individual serving as Chief Medical Officer shall be an officer of the Armed Forces who holds a grade not below the grade of colonel, or captain in the Navy. (3) Chain of command The Chief Medical Officer shall report to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs in the performance of duties and the exercise of powers of the Chief Medical Officer under this section. (b) Duties (1) In general The Chief Medical Officer shall oversee the provision of medical care to individuals detained at Guantanamo. (2) Quality of care The Chief Medical Officer shall ensure that medical care provided as described in paragraph (1) meets applicable standards of care. (c) Powers (1) In general The Chief Medical Officer shall make medical determinations relating to medical care for individuals detained at Guantanamo, including— (A) decisions regarding assessment, diagnosis, and treatment; and (B) determinations concerning medical accommodations to living conditions and operating procedures for detention facilities. (2) Resolution of declination to follow determinations If the commander of Joint Task Force Guantanamo declines to follow a determination of the Chief Medical Officer under paragraph (1), the matter covered by such determination shall be jointly resolved by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict and the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs not later than seven days after receipt of notification of the matter by either Assistant Secretary. (3) Security clearances The appropriate departments or agencies of the Federal Government shall, to the extent practicable in accordance with existing procedures and requirements, process expeditiously any application and adjudication for a security clearance required by the Chief Medical Officer to carry out the Chief Medical Officer's duties and powers under this section. (d) Access to individuals, information, and assistance (1) In general The Chief Medical Officer may secure directly from the Department of Defense access to any individual, information, or assistance that the Chief Medical Officer considers necessary to enable the Chief Medical Officer to carry out this section, including full access to the following: (A) Any individual detained at Guantanamo. (B) Any medical records of any individual detained at Guantanamo. (C) Medical professionals of the Department who are working, or have worked, at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay. (2) Access upon request Upon request of the Chief Medical Officer, the Department shall make available to the Chief Medical Officer on an expeditious basis access to individuals, information, and assistance as described in paragraph (1). (3) Lack of expeditious availability If access to individuals, information, or assistance is not made available to the Chief Medical Officer upon request on an expeditious basis as required by paragraph (2), the Chief Medical Officer shall notify the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, who shall take actions to resolve the matter expeditiously. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) Individual detained at Guantanamo defined The term individual detained at Guantanamo (A) is not a national of the United States (as defined in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22) (B) is— (i) in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense; or (ii) otherwise detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay. (2) Medical care The term medical care (3) Standard of care The term standard of care E Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations 1031. Clarification of authority of military commissions under chapter 47A (a) Clarification (1) In general Subchapter IV of chapter 47A 949o–1. Contempt (a) Authority to punish (1) With respect to any proceeding under this chapter, a judicial officer specified in paragraph (2) may punish for contempt any person who— (A) uses any menacing word, sign, or gesture in the presence of the judicial officer during the proceeding; (B) disturbs the proceeding by any riot or disorder; or (C) willfully disobeys a lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command issued with respect to the proceeding. (2) A judicial officer referred to in paragraph (1) is any of the following: (A) Any judge of the United States Court of Military Commission Review. (B) Any military judge detailed to a military commission or any other proceeding under this chapter. (b) Punishment The punishment for contempt under subsection (a) may not exceed confinement for 30 days, a fine of $1,000, or both. (c) Review (1) A punishment under this section— (A) is not reviewable by the convening authority of a military commission under this chapter; (B) if imposed by a military judge, shall constitute a judgment, subject to review in the first instance only by the United States Court of Military Commission Review and then only by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and (C) if imposed by a judge of the United States Court of Military Commission Review, shall constitute a judgment of the court subject to review only by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. (2) In reviewing a punishment for contempt imposed under this section, the reviewing court shall affirm such punishment unless the court finds that imposing such punishment was an abuse of the discretion of the judicial officer who imposed such punishment. (3) A petition for review of punishment for contempt imposed under this section shall be filed not later than 60 days after the date on which the authenticated record upon which the contempt punishment is based and any contempt proceedings conducted by the judicial officer are served on the person punished for contempt. (d) Punishment not conviction Punishment for contempt is not a conviction or sentence within the meaning of section 949m of this title. The imposition of punishment for contempt is not governed by other provisions of this chapter applicable to military commissions, except that the Secretary of Defense may prescribe procedures for contempt proceedings and punishments, pursuant to the authority provided in section 949a of this title. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter IV of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 949o–1. Contempt. . (b) Conforming amendments Section 950t of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking paragraph (31); and (2) by redesignating paragraph (32) as paragraph (31). (c) Rule of construction The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) shall not be construed to affect the lawfulness of any punishment for contempt adjudged prior to the effective date of such amendments. (d) Applicability The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to conduct by a person that occurs on or after such date. 1032. Comprehensive Department of Defense policy on collective self-defense (a) Comprehensive policy required The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe a comprehensive written policy for the Department of Defense on the issuance of authorization for, and the provision by members and units of the United States Armed Forces of, collective self-defense to designated foreign nationals, their facilities, and their property. (b) Elements The policy required by subsection (a) shall address the following: (1) Each basis under domestic and international law pursuant to which a member or unit of the United States Armed Forces has been or may be authorized to provide collective self-defense to designated foreign nationals, their facilities, or their property under each circumstance as follows: (A) Inside an area of active hostilities, or in a country or territory in which United States forces are authorized to conduct or support direct action operations. (B) Outside an area of active hostilities, or in a country or territory in which United States forces are not authorized to conduct direct action military operations. (C) When United States personnel, facilities, or equipment are not threatened, including both as described in subparagraph (A) and as described in subparagraph (B). (D) When members of the United States Armed Forces are not participating in a military operation as part of an international coalition. (E) Any other circumstance not encompassed by subparagraphs (A) through (D) in which a member or unit of the United States Armed Forces has been or may be authorized to provide such collective self-defense. (2) A list and explanation of any limitations imposed by law or policy on the provision of collective self-defense to designated foreign nationals, their facilities, and their property under any of the bases in domestic or international law in the circumstances enumerated in paragraph (1), and the conditions under which any such limitation applies. (3) The procedure by which a proposal that any member or unit of the United States Armed Forces provide collective self-defense in support of designated foreign nationals, their facilities, and their property is to be submitted, processed, and endorsed through offices, officers, and officials of the Department to the applicable approval authority for final decision, and a list of any information, advice, or opinion to be included with such proposal in order to inform appropriate action on such proposal by such approval authority. (4) The title and duty position of any officers and officials of the Department empowered to render a final decision on a proposal described in paragraph (3), and the conditions applicable to, and limitations on, the exercise of such decisionmaking authority by each such officer or official. (5) A description of the Rules of Engagement applicable to the provision of collective self-defense to designated foreign nationals, their facilities, and their property under any of the bases in domestic or international law in the circumstances enumerated in paragraph (1), and the conditions under which any such Rules of Engagement would be modified. (6) A description of the process through which policy guidance pertaining to the authorization for, and the provision by members of the United States Armed Forces of, collective self-defense to designated foreign nationals, their facilities, and their property is to be disseminated to the level of tactical execution. (7) Such other matters as the Secretary considers appropriate. (c) Report on policy (1) In general Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the policy required by subsection (a). (2) DoD general counsel statement The Secretary shall include in the report under paragraph (1) a statement by the General Counsel of the Department of Defense as to whether the policy prescribed pursuant to subsection (a) is consistent with domestic and international law. (3) Form The report required by paragraph (1) may be submitted in classified form. (d) Briefing on policy Not later than 30 days after the date of the submittal of the report required by subsection (c), the Secretary shall provide the congressional defense committees a classified briefing on the policy prescribed pursuant to subsection (a). The briefing shall make use of vignettes designated to illustrate real world application of the policy in each the circumstances enumerated in subsection (b)(1). 1033. Oversight of Department of Defense execute orders (a) Review of execute orders Upon a written request by the Chairman or Ranking Member of a congressional defense committee, the Secretary of Defense shall provide the committee, including appropriately designated staff of the committee, with an execute order approved by the Secretary or the commander of a combatant command for reveiw within 30 days of receiving the written request. (b) Exception (1) In general In extraordinary circumstances necessary to protect operations security, the sensitivity of the execute order, or other appropriate considerations, the Secretary may limit review of an execute order. (2) Summary and other information In extraordinary circumstances described in paragraph (1) with respect to an execute order, the Secretary shall provide the committee concerned, including appropriately designated staff of the committee, a detailed summary of the execute order and other information necessary for the conduct of the oversight duties of the committee within 30 days of receiving the written request under subsection (a). 1034. Prohibition on ownership or trading of stocks in certain companies by Department of Defense officers and employees (a) Prohibition on ownership and trading by certain senior officials (1) Prohibition An official of the Department of Defense described in paragraph (2) may not own or trade a publicly traded stock of a company if, during the preceding calendar year, the company received more than $1,000,000,000 in revenue from the Department of Defense, including through one or more contracts with the Department. (2) Department of Defense officials An official of the Department of Defense described in this paragraph is any current Department of Defense official described by section 847(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( 10 U.S.C. 1701 (3) Administrative actions In the event that an official of the Department of Defense described in subsection (a) knowingly fails to comply with the requirements of this subsection, the Secretary of Defense may take administrative action against the official, including suspension or termination, in accordance with the procedures otherwise applicable to administrative actions against such officials. (b) Prohibition on ownership and trading by all officers and employees An officer or employee of the Department of Defense may not own or trade a publicly traded stock of a company that is a contractor or subcontractor of the Department if the Office of Standards and Compliance of the Office of the General Counsel of the Department of Defense determines that the value of the stock may be directly or indirectly influenced by any official action of the officer or employee for the Department. (c) Inapplicability to mutual funds For purposes of this section, publically-traded stock does not include a widely-held investment fund described in section 102(f)(8) 1035. Policy regarding the transition of data and applications to the cloud (a) Policy required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense and the Chief Data Officer of the Department shall, in consultation with the J6 of the Joint Staff and the Chief Management Officer, develop and issue enterprise-wide policy and implementing instructions regarding the transition of data and applications to the cloud under the Department cloud strategy in accordance with subsection (b). (b) Design The policy required by subsection (a) shall be designed to dramatically improve support to operational missions and management processes, including by the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies, by— (1) making the data of the Department available to support new types of analyses; (2) preventing, to the maximum extent practicable, the replication in the cloud of data stores that cannot readily be accessed by applications for which the data stores were not originally engineered; (3) ensuring that data sets can be readily discovered and combined with others to enable new insights and capabilities; and (4) ensuring that data and applications are readily portable and not tightly coupled to a specific cloud infrastructure or platform. 1036. Modernization of inspection authorities applicable to the National Guard and extension of inspection authority to the Chief of the National Guard Bureau (a) Modernization of inspection authorities of Secretaries of the Army and Air Force Subsection (a) of section 105 of title 32, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1)— (A) by striking by him, the Secretary of the Army shall have by such Secretary, the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Air Force shall each have (B) by striking , if necessary, (C) by striking the Regular Army the Regular Army or the Regular Air Force (2) by striking Army National Guard Army National Guard or Air National Guard (3) by striking the flush matter following paragraph (7). (b) Inspection authority of Chief of the National Guard Bureau Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (c) Under regulations prescribed by the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, the Chief of the National Guard Bureau may have an inspection made by inspectors general, or by commissioned officers of the Army National Guard of the United States or the Air National Guard of the United States detailed for that purpose, in order to determine the following: (1) Whether the units and members of the Army National Guard comply with Federal law and policy applicable to the National Guard, including policies issued by the Department of Defense, the Department of the Army, and the National Guard Bureau. (2) Whether the units and members of the Air National Guard comply with Federal law and policy applicable to the National Guard, including policies issued by the Department of Defense, the Department of the Air Force, and the National Guard Bureau. . 1037. Enhancement of authorities on forfeiture of Federal benefits by the National Guard (a) In general The text of section 108 of title 32, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (a) Availability of funds contingent on compliance with Federal law and policy The availability of Federal funds provided to the National Guard of individual States is contingent upon compliance with Federal law and policy applicable to the National Guard. (b) Bar of States for failure To comply If, within a time fixed by the President, a State fails to comply with Federal law or policy applicable to the National Guard, a requirement of this title, or a regulation prescribed under this title, the National Guard of that State is barred, in whole or in part (as the President may prescribe), from receiving such money or other aid, benefit, or privilege authorized by law with respect to the National Guard of that State as the President may prescribe. (c) Bar or withdrawal of recognition of officers for failure To comply If, within a time fixed by the President, an officer of the National Guard fails to comply with Federal law or policy applicable to the National Guard, the President may bar the officer from receiving Federal funds, or withdraw the officer’s Federal recognition under section 323 of this title. (d) Bar or withdrawal of recognition of units for failure To comply If, within a time fixed by the President, a unit of the National Guard fails to comply with Federal law or policy applicable to the National Guard, the President may bar the unit from receiving Federal funds, or withdraw the unit’s Federal recognition. (e) Advance notice to Congress on final actions Before taking a final action under subsection (c) or (d), President shall notify the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives of such final action. (f) Limitation on delegation of final actions The President may not delegate the authority to take a final action under subsection (c) or (d) to any official other than the Secretary of Defense. . (b) Effective date The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on October 1, 2019, and shall apply with respect to amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years that begin on or after that date. 1038. Modernization of authorities on property and fiscal officers of the National Guard (a) Property and fiscal officer for each State from NGB Section 708 of title 32, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following new subsection (a): (a) Property and fiscal officer for each State (1) The Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall assign, designate, or detail, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Army or the Secretary of the Air Force, as applicable, a qualified commissioned officer ordered to active duty in the National Guard Bureau under section 12402(a) of title 10 to be the property and fiscal officer of each State, Territory, and the District of Columbia. (2) (A) An officer may not be assigned, designated, or detailed as the property and fiscal officer of a State, Territory, or the District of Columbia under paragraph (1) if the officer has served within such jurisdiction during the 36 months preceding such assignment, designation, or detail. (B) The Secretary of the Army or the Secretary of the Air Force may waive the applicability of subparagraph (A) to the assignment, designation, or detail of a particular officer if such Secretary considers the waiver to be in the best interests of the State, Territory, or District of Columbia, as applicable, concerned. (3) An officer assigned, designated, or detailed as a property and fiscal officer under paragraph (1) shall, while so serving as such an officer, serve in a grade commensurate with the functions and responsibilities of the officer, but not above the grade of colonel. ; and (2) by striking subsection (d). (b) Support staff Such section is further amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (a), as amended by subsection (a) of this section, the following new subsection (b): (b) Support staff The Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall assign, designate, or detail other personnel of the National Guard Bureau to serve as the Federal support staff for the property and fiscal officer for the National Guard of each State, Territory, or the District of Columbia under subsection (a). . (c) Responsibilities Subsection (c) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (b)(1) of this section, is amended— (1) by inserting Responsibilities of officers (c) (2) in paragraph (1), by striking he such officer (3) in paragraph (2), by inserting , the Chief of Staff of the Army or the Chief of Staff of the Air Force (as applicable), or the Chief of the National Guard Bureau (d) Other matters Such section is further amended— (1) by striking subsection (d), as redesignated by subsection (b)(1) of this section; and (2) by striking subsection (e). (e) Intrustment of monies Such section is further amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (d); and (2) in subsection (d), as so redesignated— (A) by inserting Intrustment of monies (d) (B) by striking an officer a Federally recognized officer (C) by striking him such agent officer (D) by striking he the agent officer 1039. Limitation on placement by the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness of work with federally funded research and development centers (a) Limitation The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness may not place any work with a federally funded research and development center (FFRDC) until the Under Secretary submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on all studies, reports, and other analyses being undertaken for the Under Secretary as of the date of the report by federally funded research and development centers. (b) Elements The report required by subsection (a) shall set forth the following: (1) A list of each study, report, and analysis described by subsection (a). (2) For each study, report, or analysis, the following: (A) Title. (B) Federally funded research and development center undertaking. (C) Amount of contract. (D) Anticipated completion date. 1040. Termination of requirement for Department of Defense facility access clearances for joint ventures composed of previously-cleared entities A clearance for access to a Department of Defense installation or facility may not be required for a joint venture if that joint venture is composed entirely of entities that are currently cleared for access to such installation or facility. 1041. Designation of Department of Defense Strategic Arctic Ports (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) The strategic importance of the Arctic continues to increase as the United States and other countries recognize the military significance of the sea lanes and choke points within the region and understand the potential for power projection from the Arctic into multiple regions. (2) On January 19, 2018, Secretary of Defense James Mattis released the document titled 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America (3) Russia and China have conducted military exercises together in the Arctic, have agreed to connect the Northern Sea Route, claimed by Russia, with China’s Maritime Silk Road, and are working together in developing natural gas resources in the Arctic. (4) The Government of the Russian Federation— (A) has prioritized the development of Arctic capabilities and has made significant investments in military infrastructure in the Arctic, including the creation of a new Arctic Command and the construction or refurbishment of 16 deepwater ports and 14 airfields in the region; (B) has approximately 40 icebreakers as of May 2019, including several nuclear-powered icebreakers, is currently constructing four icebreakers, and is planning to build an additional eight icebreakers; and (C) conducted the largest military exercise since the 1980s, Vostok 2018, which included— (i) 300,000 troops; (ii) 1,000 aircraft; (iii) 80 ships; (iv) 36,000 vehicles; and (v) notably, 3,200 Chinese troops, 30 Chinese rotary and fixed-wing aircraft, and 900 Chinese tanks. (5) The Government of the People’s Republic of China— (A) released, in January 2018, its new Arctic Strategy, the Polar Silk Road, in which it declares itself as a near-Arctic state (B) has publicly stated that it seeks to expand its Belt and Road Initiative (C) has shown great interest in expanding its Arctic presence, including through— (i) the operation of research vessels in the region; (ii) the recent construction of the Xuelong 2, or Snow Dragon II, the only polar research boat vessel in the world that can break ice while going forward or backward; (iii) a freedom of navigation operation in the Aleutian Islands in 2015; and (iv) its recent plans to develop a 33,000 ton nuclear-powered icebreaker. (6) The economic significance of the Arctic continues to grow as countries around the globe begin to understand the potential for maritime transportation through, and economic and trade development in, the region. (7) The Arctic is home to 13 percent of the world’s undiscovered oil, 30 percent of its undiscovered gas, an abundance of uranium, rare earth minerals, gold, diamonds, and millions of square miles of untapped resources, including abundant fisheries. (8) The Bering Strait is experiencing significant increases in international traffic from vessels transiting the Northern Sea Route, increases which are projected to continue if decreases in sea ice coverage continue. (9) Along a future ice-free Arctic shipping route, a ship sailing from South Korea to Germany would have an average travel time of just 23 days, compared to 34 days via the Suez Canal and 46 days via the Cape of Good Hope. (10) In a speech at the Arctic Forum in September 2011, Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin highlighted the Northern Sea Route as a potential alternative to the Suez Canal and has publicly stated plans to invest $11,400,000,000 along the Northern Sea Route by 2024. (11) Increases in human, maritime, and resource development activity in the Arctic region are expected to create additional mission requirements for the Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security, given— (A) the strategic focus of the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of the People's Republic of China on the Arctic; (B) overlapping territorial claims; and (C) the potential for maritime accidents, oil spills, and illegal fishing near the exclusive economic zone of the United States. (12) The increasing role of the United States in the Arctic has been highlighted in each of the last four National Defense Authorization Acts. (13) Section 1068 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( Public Law 114–92 (14) Section 1095 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 (15) Section 122 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 (16) Section 151 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (A) maintain an inventory of not fewer than six polar-class icebreaker vessels; (B) award a contract for the first new polar-class icebreaker not later than fiscal year 2019 and deliver the icebreaker not later than fiscal year 2023; and (C) deliver the second through sixth polar-class icebreakers at a rate of one vessel per year in fiscal years 2025 through 2029. (17) In January 2017, the Department of Defense released a report entitled Report to Congress on Strategy to Protect United States National Security Interests in the Arctic Region the ways and means (A) enhancing the capability of United States forces to defend the homeland and exercise sovereignty; (B) strengthening deterrence at home and abroad; (C) preserving freedom of the seas in the Arctic; and (D) evolving the infrastructure and capabilities of the Department in the Arctic consistent with changing conditions and needs. (18) The United States Coast Guard Arctic Strategic Outlook released in April 2019 states, Demonstrating commitment to operational presence, Canada, Denmark, and Norway have made strategic investments in ice-capable patrol ships charged with national or homeland security missions. [The United States] is the only Arctic State that has not made similar investments in ice-capable surface maritime security assets. This limits the ability of the Coast Guard, and the Nation, to credibly uphold sovereignty or respond to contingencies in the Arctic (19) On January 12, 2017, Secretary of Defense James Mattis stated, The Arctic is key strategic terrain … Russia is taking aggressive steps to increase its presence there … I will prioritize the development of an integrated strategy for the Arctic. I believe that our interests and the security of the Arctic would benefit from increasing the focus of the Department of Defense on this region (20) On January 9, 2019, Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson and Chief of Staff of the Air Force General David Goldfein wrote, … the Arctic has become even more important to the nation. Both a northern approach to the United States, as well as a critical location for projecting American power, its geo-strategic significance is difficult to overstate (21) On February 26, 2019, General John Hyten, Commander of the United States Strategic Command, stated, In particular, the Arctic is an area that we really need to focus on and really look at investing. That is no longer a buffer zone. We need to be able to operate there. We need to be able to communicate there. We need to have a presence there that we have not invested in in the same way that our adversaries have. And they see that as a vulnerability from us, whereas it is becoming a strength for them and it is a weakness for us, we need to flip that equation (22) On February 26, 2019, General Terrence O’Shaughnessy, Commander of the United States Northern Command stated, It has become clear that defense of the homeland depends on our ability to detect and defeat threats operating both in the Arctic and passing through the Arctic. Russia’s fielding of advanced, long-range cruise missiles capable of flying through the northern approaches and striking targets in the United States and Canada has emerged as the dominant military threat in the Arctic. … Meanwhile, China has declared that it is not content to remain a mere observer in the Arctic and has taken action to normalize its naval and commercial presence in the region in order to increase its access to lucrative resources and shipping routes. I view the Arctic as the front line in the defense of the United States and Canada … (23) On May 6, 2019, Admiral Karl Schultz, Commandant of the Coast Guard stated, We talk about the Arctic as a competitive space. We’ve seen China, we see Russia investing extensively. China built icebreakers in the time since we updated our strategy. China’s been operating off the Alaskan Arctic for a good part of the last six years on an annual basis. [The Coast Guard is] championing increased capabilities in the Arctic … better communications, better domain awareness … . I want to see the Arctic remain a peaceful domain. China’s a self-declared Arctic state. They’re not one of the eight Arctic nations, so for me, for the service, its presence equals influence (24) On May 6, 2019, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo stated that— (A) the Arctic has become an arena for power and for competition entering a new age of strategic engagement in the Arctic, complete with new threats to the Arctic and its real estate, and to all of our interests in that region. (B) Arctic sea lanes could become the 21st century Suez and Panama Canals. (C) We’re concerned about Russia’s claim over the international waters of the Northern Sea Route, including its newly announced plans to connect it with China’s Maritime Silk Road. (D) In the Northern Sea Route, Moscow already illegally demands other nations request permission to pass, requires Russian maritime pilots to be aboard foreign ships, and threatens to use military force to sink any that fail to comply with their demands. (E) there is a pattern of aggressive Russian behavior here in the Arctic we know Russian territorial ambitions can turn violent (F) we do not want the Arctic Ocean to transform into a new South China Sea, fraught with militarization and competing territorial claims the fragile Arctic environment exposed to the same ecological devastation caused by China’s fishing fleet in the seas off its coast, or unregulated industrial activity in its own country (25) On December 6, 2018, Secretary of the Navy Richard Spencer stated, We need to have a strategic Arctic port up in Alaska. We need to be doing FONOPs in the northwest – in the northern passage. … peace through presence with a submarine is a little tough (26) Meanwhile, the two closest strategic seaports, as designated by the Department of Defense, to the Arctic Circle are the Port of Anchorage and the Port of Tacoma, located approximately 1,500 nautical miles and 2,400 nautical miles away, respectively, and approximately 1,900 nautical miles and 2,800 nautical miles respectively from Barrow, Alaska. (27) The distance from Bangor, Maine, to Key West, Florida, is approximately 1,450 nautical miles. (b) Sense of congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the Arctic is a region of strategic importance to the national security interests of the United States and the Department of Defense must better align its presence, force posture, and capabilities to meet the growing array of challenges in the region; and (2) although much progress has been made to increase awareness of Arctic issues and to promote increased presence in the region, additional measures, including the designation of one or more strategic Arctic ports, are needed to show the commitment of the United States to this emerging strategic choke point of future great power competition. (c) Report required (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Commanding General of the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Commandant of the Coast Guard, and the Administrator of the Maritime Administration, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report evaluating potential sites for one or more strategic ports in the Arctic. (2) Elements Consistent with the updated military strategy for the protection of United States national security interests in the Arctic region set forth in the report required under section 1068 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( Public Law 114–92 (A) an evaluation of the amount of sufficient and suitable space needed to create capacity for port and other necessary infrastructure for at least one of each of type of Navy or Coast Guard vessel, including an Arleigh Burke class destroyer of the Navy, a national security cutter, and a heavy polar ice breaker of the Coast Guard; (B) an evaluation of the amount of sufficient and suitable space needed to create capacity for equipment and fuel storage, technological infrastructure, and civil infrastructure to support military and civilian operations, including— (i) aerospace warning; (ii) maritime surface and subsurface warning; (iii) maritime control and defense; (iv) maritime domain awareness; (v) homeland defense; (vi) defense support to civil authorities; (vii) humanitarian relief; (viii) search and rescue; (ix) disaster relief; (x) oil spill response; (xi) medical stabilization and evacuation; and (xii) meteorological measurements and forecasting; (C) an identification of proximity and road access required to an airport designated as a commercial service airport by the Federal Aviation Administration that is capable of supporting military and civilian aircraft for operations designated in subparagraph (B); (D) a description of the requirements, to include infrastructure and installations, communications, and logistics necessary to improve response effectiveness to support military and civilian operations described in subparagraph (B); (E) an identification of the sites that the Secretary recommends as potential sites for designation as Department of Defense Strategic Arctic Ports; (F) the estimated cost of sufficient construction necessary to initiate and sustain expected operations at such sites; and (G) such other information as the Secretary deems relevant. (d) Designation of strategic Arctic ports Not later than 90 days after the date on which the report required under subsection (c) is submitted, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Commanding General of the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Commandant of the Coast Guard, and the Administrator of the Maritime Administration, shall designate one or more ports as Department of Defense Strategic Arctic Ports from the sites identified under subsection (c)(2)(E). (e) Rule of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to authorize any additional appropriations for the Department of Defense for the establishment of any port designated pursuant to this section. (f) Arctic defined In this section, the term Arctic 15 U.S.C. 4111 1042. Extension of National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence (a) Extension Subsection (e) of section 1051 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 October 1, 2020 March 1, 2021 (b) Reports Subsection (c) of such section is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act Not later than August 1, 2019 (2) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and (3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraphs: (2) Interim reports Not later than each of December 1, 2019, and December 1, 2020, the Commission shall submit as described in that paragraph an interim report on the review required under subsection (b). (3) Final report Not later than March 1, 2021, the Commission shall submit as described in paragraph (1) a comprehensive final report on the review required under subsection (b). . 1043. Authority to transfer funds for Bien Hoa dioxin cleanup (a) Transfer authority Notwithstanding section 2215 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense may transfer to the Secretary of State, for use by the United States Agency for International Development, amounts to be used for the Bien Hoa dioxin cleanup in Vietnam. (b) Limitation on amount Not more than $15,000,000 may be transferred in fiscal year 2020 under the authority in subsection (a). (c) Additional transfer authority The transfer authority in subsection (a) is in addition to any other transfer authority available to the Department of Defense. 1044. Limitation on use of funds to house children separated from parents (a) In general None of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 may be used to house a child separated from a parent. (b) Child separated from a parent defined The term child separated from a parent (1) entered the United States, before attaining 18 years of age, at a port of entry or between ports of entry; and (2) was separated from his or her parent or legal guardian by the Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Homeland Security failed to demonstrate in a hearing that the parent or legal guardian was unfit or presented a danger to the child. F Studies and Reports 1051. Modification of annual reporting requirements on defense manpower (a) Conversion of annual requirements report into annual profile report Section 115a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking the first two sentences and inserting the following new sentence: Not later than April 1 each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a defense manpower profile report. (B) in paragraph (1), by adding and (C) in paragraph (2), by striking ; and (D) by striking paragraph (3); (2) in subsection (b)— (A) by striking (1) (B) by striking paragraphs (2) and (3); (3) in subsection (c), by striking the following: the manpower required for support and overhead functions within the armed forces and the Department of Defense. (4) by striking subsections (e) and (h); and (5) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (e) and (f), respectively. (b) Conversion of certain current report elements into separate, modified reports Such section is further amended— (1) in subsection (e), as redesignated by subsection (a)(5) of this section— (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking The Secretary shall also include in each such report Not later than June 1 each year, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that sets forth (B) in paragraph (1), by striking and estimates of such numbers for the current fiscal year and subsequent fiscal years (2) in subsection (f), as so redesignated— (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking In each report submitted under subsection (a), the Secretary shall also include a detailed discussion Not later than September 1 each year, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that sets forth a detailed discussion, current as of the preceding fiscal year (B) by striking the year the fiscal year (c) Conforming and clerical amendments (1) Heading amendment The heading of such section is amended to read as follows: 115a. Annual defense manpower profile report and related reports . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 115a and inserting the following new item: 115a. Annual defense manpower profile report and related reports. . 1052. Report on Department of Defense efforts to implement a force planning process in support of implementation of the 2018 National Defense Strategy (a) Report required Not later than February 1, 2020, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the plan and processes of the Department of Defense to provide analytic support to senior leaders of the Department for the force planning required to implement the 2018 National Defense Strategy. The analytic support shall be designed to weigh options, examine tradeoffs across the joint force, and drive decisions on force sizing, shaping, capability, and concept development in order to address the threats outlined in the 2018 National Defense Strategy. (b) Elements The report required by subsection (a) shall include an assessment of the following: (1) The major elements, products, and milestones of the force planning process of the Department. (2) The conclusions and recommendations of the Defense Planning and Analysis Community initiative. (3) The progress of the Department in implementing the recommendations of the Comptroller General of the United States set forth in Government Accountability Office Report GAO–19–40C. (4) The progress of the Under Secretary, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation in implementing paragraph (5) of section 134(b) of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 902(b) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 1053. Extension of annual reports on civilian casualties in connection with United States military operations Section 1057(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 the date this is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act December 31, 2025 1054. Report on joint force plan for implementation of strategies of the Department of Defense for the Arctic (a) In general Not later than 270 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees the report on an updated Arctic strategy to improve and enhance joint operations required by section 1071 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (1) The December 2016 Report to Congress on the Strategy to Protect United States National Security Interests in the Arctic Region. (2) The updated Arctic strategy to improve and enhance joint operations. (b) Elements The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following in connection with the strategies for the Arctic referred to in that subsection: (1) A description of the specific means for— (A) enhancing the capability of the Armed Forces to defend the homeland and exercise sovereignty; (B) strengthening deterrence at home and abroad; (C) strengthening alliances and partnerships; (D) preserving freedom of the seas in the Arctic; (E) engaging public, private, and international partners to improve domain awareness in the Arctic; (F) developing Department of Defense Arctic infrastructure and capabilities consistent with changing conditions and needs; (G) providing support to civil authorities, as directed; (H) partnering with other departments, agencies, and countries to support human and environmental security; and (I) supporting international institutions that promote regional cooperation and the rule of law. (2) An analysis of the operational and contingency plans for the protection of United States national security interests in the Arctic region. (3) A description of training, capability, and resource gaps that must be addressed to execute each mission described in the updated Arctic strategy. (4) A description of the current and projected Arctic capabilities of the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China, and an analysis of United States capabilities for satisfying— (A) each mission described in the updated Arctic strategy; and (B) the strategic objectives in the National Defense Strategy. (c) Form The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 1055. Report on use of Northern Tier bases in implementation of Arctic strategy of the United States (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of the Air Force, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report outlining how bases in the northern latitudes, including Northern Tier bases, may be used in the implementation of— (1) recommendations included in the report submitted by the Secretary of Defense to Congress in December 2016 entitled Report to Congress on Strategy to Protect United States National Security Interests in the Arctic Region (2) the updated Arctic strategy to improve and enhance joint operations required to be submitted to the congressional defense committees under section 1071 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (b) Inclusion of mission sets The report under subsection (a) shall include a description of current and future mission sets at Northern Tier bases that may further the Arctic strategy of the United States. (c) Northern Tier bases defined In this section, the term Northern Tier bases 1056. Report on the Department of Defense plan for mass-casualty disaster response operations in the Arctic (a) Sense of Senate It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) the Department of Defense may be called upon to support the Coast Guard and other agencies of the Department of Homeland Security in responding to any mass-casualty disaster response operations in the Arctic; (2) coordination between the Department of Defense and the Coast Guard might be necessary for responding to a mass-casualty event in the Arctic; and (3) prior planning for Arctic mass-casualty disaster response operations will bolster the response of the Federal Government to a mass-casualty disaster in the Arctic environment. (b) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the plan of the Department of Defense for assisting mass-casualty disaster response operations in the Arctic. (c) Elements The report required by subsection (b) shall include the following: (1) A description of the assets that could be made available to support other agencies and departments of the Federal Government for mass-casualty disaster response operations in the Arctic. (2) A description and assessment of the command, control, and coordination relationships that would be useful to integrate rescue forces for such operations from multiple departments and agencies of the Federal Government. (3) A description and assessment of the communications assets that could be made available in support of other agencies and departments of the Federal Government for communication and coordination in such operations. (4) A description of any cooperative arrangements with Canada and other regional partners in providing rescue assets and infrastructure in connection with such operations. (5) A description of available medical infrastructure and assets that could be made available in support of other agencies and departments of the Federal Government for aeromedical evacuation in connection with such operations. (6) A description of available shelter locations that could be made available in support of other agencies and departments of the Federal Government for use in connection with such operations, including the number of people that can be sheltered per location. (7) An assessment of logistical challenges that evacuations from the Arctic in connection with such operations entail, including potential rotary and fixed-wing aircraft trans-load locations and onward movement requirements. (d) Appropriate committees of Congress defined In this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress (1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Homeland Security, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. 1057. Annual reports on approval of employment or compensation of retired general or flag officers by foreign governments for Emoluments Clause purposes (a) Annual reports Section 908 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (d) Annual reports on approvals for retired general and flag officers (1) Not later than January 31 each year, the Secretaries of the military departments shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees and Members of Congress a report on each approval under subsection (b) for employment or compensation described in subsection (a) for a retired member of the armed forces in a general or flag officer grade that was issued during the preceding year. (2) In this subsection, the appropriate committees and Members of Congress are— (A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; (B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; (C) the Majority Leader and the Minority Leader of the Senate; and (D) the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives. . (b) Scope of first report The first report submitted pursuant to subsection (d) of section 908 of title 37, United States Code (as added by subsection (a) of this section), after the date of the enactment of this Act shall cover the five-year period ending with the year before the year in which such report is submitted. 1058. Transmittal to Congress of requests for assistance received by the Department of Defense from other departments (a) Requests for Assistance Not later than seven calendar days after the receipt by the Department of Defense of a Request for Assistance from the Department of Homeland Security or the Department of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of Defense shall electronically transmit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a copy of such Request for Assistance. (b) Responses to requests At the same time the Secretary of Defense submits to the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Secretary of Health and Human Services an official response of the Department of Defense to a Request for Assistance from the Department of Homeland Security or the Department of Health and Human Services, as applicable, the Secretary of Defense shall transmit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a copy of such official response. 1059. Semiannual report on Consolidated Adjudication Facility of the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency Not less frequently than once every six months until the Director of the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency determines that a steady-state level has been achieved for the Consolidated Adjudication Facility of the Agency, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on inventory and timeliness metrics relating to such facility. 1060 Comptroller General of the United States report on post-government employment of former Department of Defense officials Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall initiate a review updating the information and findings contained in the May 2008 Government Accountability Office report entitled, Defense Contracting: Post-Government Employment of Former DOD Officials Needs Greater Transparency G Treatment of Contaminated Water Near Military Installations 1071. Short title This subtitle may be cited as the Prompt and Fast Action to Stop Damages Act of 2019 1072. Definitions In this subtitle: (1) PFOA The term PFOA (2) PFOS The term PFOS 1073. Provision of water uncontaminated with perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) for agricultural purposes (a) Authority (1) In general Using amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for operation and maintenance for the military department concerned, or for operation and maintenance Defense-wide in the case of the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary concerned may provide water sources uncontaminated with perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, including PFOA and PFOS, or treatment of contaminated waters, for agricultural purposes used to produce products destined for human consumption in an area in which a water source has been determined pursuant to paragraph (2) to be contaminated with such compounds by reason of activities on a military installation under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned. (2) Applicable standard For purposes of paragraph (1), an area is determined to be contaminated with PFOA or PFOS if— (A) the level of contamination is above the Lifetime Health Advisory for contamination with such compounds issued by the Environmental Protection Agency and printed in the Federal Register on May 25, 2016; or (B) on or after the date the Food and Drug Administration sets a standard for PFOA and PFOS in raw agricultural commodities and milk, the level of contamination is above such standard. (b) Secretary concerned defined In this section, the term Secretary concerned (1) The Secretary of the Army, with respect to the Army. (2) The Secretary of the Navy, with respect to the Navy, the Marine Corps, and the Coast Guard (when it is operating as a service in the Navy). (3) The Secretary of the Air Force, with respect to the Air Force. (4) The Secretary of Defense, with respect to the Defense Agencies. 1074. Acquisition of real property by Air Force (a) Authority (1) In general The Secretary of the Air Force may acquire one or more parcels of real property within the vicinity of an Air Force base that has shown signs of contamination from PFOA and PFOS due to activities on the base and which would extend the contiguous geographic footprint of the base and increase the force protection standoff near critical infrastructure and runways. (2) Improvements and personal property The authority under paragraph (1) to acquire real property described in that paragraph shall include the authority to purchase improvements and personal property located on that real property. (3) Relocation expenses The authority under paragraph (1) to acquire real property described in that paragraph shall include the authority to provide Federal financial assistance for moving costs, relocation benefits, and other expenses incurred in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 ( 42 U.S.C. 4601 (b) Environmental activities The Air Force shall conduct such activities at a parcel or parcels of real property acquired under subsection (a) as are necessary to remediate contamination from PFOA and PFOS related to activities at the Air Force base. (c) Funding Funds for the land acquisitions authorized under subsection (a) shall be derived from amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for military construction or the unobligated balances of appropriations for military construction that are enacted after the date of the enactment of this Act. (d) Rule of construction The authority under this section constitutes authority to carry out land acquisitions for purposes of section 2802 of title 10, United States Code. 1075. Remediation plan (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a remediation plan for cleanup of all water at or adjacent to a military base that is contaminated with PFOA or PFOS. (b) Study In preparing the remediation plan under subsection (a), the Secretary shall conduct a study on the contamination of water at military bases with PFOA or PFOS. (c) Budget amount The Secretary shall ensure that each budget of the President submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, requests funding in amounts necessary to address remediation efforts under the remediation plan submitted under subsection (a). H Other Matters 1081. Revision to authorities relating to mail service for members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilians overseas (a) Eligibility for free mail Section 3401(a) of title 39, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (a) (1) First-class letter mail having the character of personal correspondence shall be carried, at no cost to the sender, in the manner provided by this section, when mailed by an eligible individual described in paragraph (2) and addressed to a place within the delivery limits of a United States post office, if— (A) such letter mail is mailed by the eligible individual at an Armed Forces post office established in an overseas area designated by the President, where the Armed Forces of the United States are deployed for a contingency operation as determined by the Secretary of Defense; or (B) the eligible individual is hospitalized as a result of disease or injury incurred as a result of service in an overseas area designated by the President under subparagraph (A). (2) An eligible individual described in this paragraph is— (A) a member of the Armed Forces of the United States on active duty, as defined in section 101 of title 10; or (B) a civilian employee of the Department of Defense or a military department who is providing support to military operations. . (b) Surface shipment of mail authorized Section 3401 of title 39, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking subsection (c); (2) by redesignating subsections (d), (e), (f), and (g) as subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f), respectively; and (3) by amending subsection (b) to read as follows: (b) There shall be transported by surface or air, consistent with the service purchased by the mailer, between Armed Forces post offices or from an Armed Forces post office to a point of entry into the United States, the following categories of mail matter which are mailed at any such Armed Forces post office: (1) Letter mail communications having the character of personal correspondence. (2) Any parcel exceeding 1 pound in weight but less than 70 pounds in weight and less than 130 inches in length and girth combined. (3) Publications published not less frequently than once per week and featuring principally current news of interest to members of the Armed Forces of the United States and the general public. . (c) Technical and conforming amendments (1) Section 3401 of title 39, United States Code, is amended in the section heading by striking and of friendly foreign nations (2) The table of sections for chapter 34 3401. Mailing privileges of members of Armed Forces of the United States. . 1082. Access to and use of military post offices by United States citizens employed overseas by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization who perform functions in support of military operations of the Armed Forces Section 406 of title 39, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: (c) (1) The Secretary of Defense may authorize the use of a post office established under subsection (a) in a location outside the United States by citizens of the United States— (A) who— (i) are employed by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization; and (ii) perform functions in support of the Armed Forces of the United States; and (B) if the Secretary makes a written determination that such use is— (i) in the best interests of the Department of Defense; and (ii) otherwise authorized by applicable host nation law or agreement. (2) No funds may be obligated or expended to establish, maintain, or expand a post office established under subsection (a) for the purpose of use described in paragraph (1) of this subsection. . 1083. Guarantee of residency for spouses of members of uniformed services (a) In general Title VI of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act ( 50 U.S.C. 4021 707. Guarantee of residency for spouses of servicemembers For the purposes of establishing the residency of a spouse of a servicemember for any purpose, the spouse of a servicemember may elect to use the same residence as the servicemember regardless of the date on which the marriage of the spouse and the servicemember occurred. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of contents in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 706 the following new item: Sec. 707. Guarantee of residency for spouses of servicemembers. . 1084. Extension of requirement for briefings on the national biodefense strategy Section 1086(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 6 U.S.C. 104 March 1, 2019 March 1, 2025 1085. Extension of National Commission on Military Aviation Safety (a) Extension of deadline for report Section 1087(h)(2) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 March 1, 2020 December 31, 2020 (b) Calendar year 2020 funding Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the Department of Defense by this Act, $3,000,000 shall be available for the National Commission on Aviation Safety under section 1087 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 in calendar year 2020. XI Civilian Personnel Matters 1101. Modification of temporary assignments of Department of Defense employees to a private-sector organization Section 1599g(e)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting permanent without the 1102. Modification of number of available appointments for certain agencies under personnel management authority to attract experts in science and engineering Section 1599h(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking 40 10 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking 100 130 1103. One-year extension of temporary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to civilian personnel on official duty in a combat zone Paragraph (2) of section 1603(a) of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 ( Public Law 109–234 Public Law 110–417 Public Law 115–232 2020 2021 1104. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees working overseas Subsection (a) of section 1101 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( Public Law 110–417 Public Law 115–232 through 2019 through 2020 1105. Reimbursement of Federal employees for Federal, State, and local income taxes incurred during travel, transportation, and relocation (a) In general 5724b of title 5, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the section heading by striking of employees transferred (2) in subsection (a)— (A) in the first sentence, by striking employee, or by an employee and such employee's spouse (if filing jointly), for any moving or storage individual, or by an individual and such individual’s spouse (if filing jointly), for any travel, transportation, or relocation (B) in the second sentence, by striking employee individual, or the individual (3) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following: (b) For purposes of this section, the term travel, transportation, or relocation expenses . (b) Technical and conforming amendment The table of sections for chapter 57 5724b. Taxes on reimbursements for travel, transportation, and relocation expenses. . (c) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall— (1) take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act; and (2) apply to travel, transportation, or relocation expenses incurred on or after that date. XII Matters relating to foreign nations A Assistance and training 1201. Extension of support of special operations for irregular warfare Section 1202(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 fiscal years 2018 through 2020 fiscal years 2020 through 2025 1202. Extension of authority for cross servicing agreements for loan of personnel protection and personnel survivability equipment in coalition operations Section 1207(e) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck 10 U.S.C. 2342 September 30, 2019 September 30, 2024 1203. Two-year extension of program authority for Global Security Contingency Fund Section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ( 22 U.S.C. 2151 (1) in subsection (i)(1), by striking September 30, 2019 September 30, 2021 (2) in subsection (o)— (A) in the first sentence, by striking September 30, 2019 September 30, 2021 (B) in the second sentence, by striking through 2019 through 2021 1204. Modification of reporting requirement for use of funds for security cooperation programs and activities Section 381(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 30 days 60 days 1205. Institutional legal capacity building initiative for foreign defense forces (a) Authorization The Secretary of Defense may carry out, consistent with section 332 of title 10, United States Code, an initiative of institutional legal capacity building in collaboration with the appropriate institutions of one or more foreign countries to enhance the capacity of the applicable foreign country to organize, administer, manage, maintain, sustain, or oversee the military legal institutions of such country. (b) Purpose The purpose of the initiative under subsection (a) is to enhance, as appropriate, the institutional legal capacity of the applicable foreign country to do the following: (1) Integrate legal matters into the authority, doctrine, and policies of the defense ministry of such country. (2) Provide appropriate legal support to commanders conducting military operations. (3) With respect to military law, institutionalize education, training, and professional development for military personnel, including military lawyers, officers, and civilian leadership within such defense ministry. (4) Establish a military justice system that is objective, transparent, and impartial. (5) Build the legal capacity of military forces to provide equitable, transparent, and accountable institutions and provide for anti-corruption measures within such defense ministry. (6) Build capacity— (A) to provide for the protection of civilians consistent with the law of armed conflict; and (B) to investigate incidents of civilian casualties. (7) Promote understanding and observance of— (A) the law of armed conflict; (B) human rights and fundamental freedoms; (C) the rule of law; and (D) civilian control of the military. (c) Elements The initiative under subsection (a) shall include the following elements: (1) An assessment of the organizational weaknesses for institutional legal capacity building of the applicable foreign country, including baseline information, an assessment of gaps in the capability and capacity of the appropriate institutions of such country, and any other indicator of efficacy for purposes of monitoring and evaluation, as determined by the Secretary. (2) A multi-year engagement plan for building institutional capacity that addresses the weaknesses identified under paragraph (1), including objectives, milestones, and a timeline. (3) The assignment of advisors, as appropriate, to the ministry of defense or other institutions of such country to assist in building core legal institutional capacity, competencies, and capabilities. (4) A measure for monitoring the implementation of the initiative and evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of the initiative, consistent with section 383 of title 10, United States Code. (d) Reports (1) In general Not later than 30 days after the end of each fiscal year beginning in fiscal year 2020 through the fiscal year in which the initiative under subsection (a) terminates, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the progress of the legal capacity building activities under this section. (2) Matters to be included Each report under paragraph (1) shall include, for the preceding fiscal year, the following: (A) The names of the one or more countries in which the initiative was conducted. (B) For each such country— (i) the purpose of the initiative; (ii) the objectives, milestones, and timeline of the initiative; (iii) the number and type of advisors assigned and deployed to the country, as applicable; (iv) an assessment of the progress of the implementation of the initiative; and (v) an evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of the initiative. (e) Sunset The initiative under subsection (a) shall terminate on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 1206. Department of Defense support for stabilization activities in national security interest of the United States (a) In general The Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State and in consultation with the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, provide support for the stabilization activities of other Federal agencies specified under subsection (c). (b) Designation of foreign areas (1) In general Amounts authorized to be provided pursuant to this section shall be available only for support for stabilization activities— (A) in a country specified in paragraph (2); and (B) that the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, has determined are in the national security interest of the United States. (2) Specified countries The countries specified in this paragraph are as follows: (A) Iraq. (B) Syria. (C) Afghanistan. (D) Somalia. (E) Yemen. (F) Libya. (c) Support to other agencies (1) In general Support may be provided for stabilization activities under subsection (a) to the Department of State, the United States Agency for International Development, or other Federal agencies, on a reimbursable or nonreimbursable basis. (2) Type of support Support under subsection (a) may consist of— (A) logistic support, supplies, and services; and (B) equipment. (d) Requirement for a stabilization strategy (1) Limitation With respect to any country specified in subsection (b)(2), no amount of support may be provided under subsection (a) until 15 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, submits to the appropriate committees of Congress a detailed report setting forth a stabilization strategy for such country. (2) Elements of strategy The stabilization strategy required by paragraph (1) shall set forth the following: (A) The United States interests in conducting stabilization activities in the country specified in subsection (b)(2). (B) The key foreign partners and actors in such country. (C) The desired end states and objectives of the United States stabilization activities in such country. (D) The Department of Defense support intended to be provided for the stabilization activities of other Federal agencies under subsection (a). (E) Any mechanism for civil-military coordination regarding support for stabilization activities. (F) The mechanisms for monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of Department of Defense support for United States stabilization activities in the area. (e) Implementation in accordance with guidance Support provided under subsection (a) shall be implemented in accordance with the guidance of the Department of Defense entitled DoD Directive 3000.05 Stabilization (f) Report The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress on an annual basis a report that includes the following: (1) The identification of each foreign area within countries specified in subsection (b)(2) for which support to stabilization has occurred. (2) The total amount spent by the Department of Defense, broken out by recipient Federal agency and activity. (3) An assessment of the contribution of each activity toward greater stability. (4) An articulation of any plans for continued Department of Defense support to stabilization in the specified foreign area in order to maintain or improve stability. (5) Other matters as the Secretary of Defense considers to be appropriate. (g) Use of funds (1) Source of funds Amounts for activities carried out under this section in a fiscal year shall be derived only from amounts authorized to be appropriated for such fiscal year for the Department of Defense for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide. (2) Limitation Not more than $25,000,000 in each fiscal year is authorized to be used to provide nonreimbursable support under this section. (h) Expiration The authority provided under this section may not be exercised after December 31, 2020. (i) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate committees of congress The term appropriate committees of Congress (A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. (2) Logistic support, supplies, and services The term logistic support, supplies, and services B Matters relating to Afghanistan and Pakistan 1211. Extension of authority to transfer defense articles and provide defense services to the military and security forces of Afghanistan (a) Extension Subsection (h) of section 1222 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 ( Public Law 112–239 Public Law 115–232 December 31, 2020 December 31, 2021 (b) Excess defense articles Subsection (i)(2) of such section 1222, as so amended, is further amended by striking December 31, 2020 December 31, 2021 1212. Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (a) Authorization of appropriations There is authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund, as established by section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( Public Law 110–181 Public Law 115–232 (b) Continuation of prior authorities and notice and reporting requirements Funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2020 shall be subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b) through (f) of such section 1513. (c) Use of funds (1) Type of assistance Subsection (b)(2) of such section 1513 is amended by inserting (including program and security assistance management support) services (d) Equipment disposition (1) Acceptance of certain equipment Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense may accept equipment that is procured using amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund by this Act and is intended for transfer to the security forces of Afghanistan, but is not accepted by such security forces. (2) Conditions on acceptance of equipment Before accepting any equipment under paragraph (1), the Commander of United States forces in Afghanistan shall make a determination that the equipment was procured for the purpose of meeting requirements of the security forces of Afghanistan, as agreed to by both the Government of Afghanistan and the United States, but is no longer required by such security forces or was damaged before transfer to such security forces. (3) Elements of determination In making a determination under paragraph (2), the Commander of United States forces in Afghanistan shall consider alternatives to acceptance of the equipment by the Secretary. An explanation of each determination, including the basis for the determination and the alternatives considered, shall be included in the relevant quarterly report under paragraph (5). (4) Treatment as Department of Defense stocks Equipment accepted under paragraph (1) may be treated as stocks of the Department of Defense upon notification to the congressional defense committees of such treatment. (5) Quarterly reports on equipment disposition (A) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90-day period thereafter during which the authority provided by paragraph (1) is exercised, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the equipment accepted during the period covered by such report under the following: (i) This subsection. (ii) Section 1531(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 ( Public Law 113–66 10 U.S.C. 2302 (iii) Section 1532(b) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck Public Law 113–291 (B) Elements Each report under subparagraph (A) shall include a list of all equipment accepted during the period covered by the report and treated as stocks of the Department of Defense and copies of the determinations made under paragraph (2), as required by paragraph (3). (e) Security of Afghan Women (1) In general Of the funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2020, it is the goal that $25,000,000, but in no event less than $10,000,000, shall be used for— (A) the recruitment, integration, retention, training, and treatment of women in the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces; and (B) the recruitment, training, and contracting of female security personnel for future elections. (2) Types of programs and activities Such programs and activities may include— (A) efforts to recruit women into the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces, including the special operations forces; (B) programs and activities of the Afghan Ministry of Defense Directorate of Human Rights and Gender Integration and the Afghan Ministry of Interior Office of Human Rights, Gender, and Child Rights; (C) development and dissemination of gender and human rights educational and training materials and programs within the Afghan Ministry of Defense and the Afghan Ministry of Interior; (D) efforts to address harassment and violence against women within the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces; (E) improvements to infrastructure that address the requirements of women serving in the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces, including appropriate equipment for female security and police forces, and transportation for policewomen to their station; (F) support for Afghan National Police Family Response Units; and (G) security provisions for high-profile female police and army officers. (f) Assessment of efforts to build capacity in the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces (1) Assessment required Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives an assessment that describes the following: (A) The integrated capacity development strategies for— (i) the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Interior of Afghanistan; and (ii) the North Atlantic Treaty Organization-led Train Advise Assist Commands and Task Forces at the national and regional levels in Afghanistan. (B) An articulation of the key capabilities to be developed and improved with respect to the Ministry of Defense, the Ministry of Interior, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization-led Train Advise Assist Commands and Task Forces, and the overall plan (including timeframes, budgets, and specific initiatives) to achieve the intended outcomes. (C) The specific roles of Department of Defense-funded advisors in building the capacity of the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Interior of Afghanistan and the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces at the national and regional levels, and the manner in which such roles align with the development strategy referred to in subparagraph (A). (D) The metrics used to assess progress on the recruitment, integration, retention, training, and treatment of women in the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces, and a progress report on such recruitment, integration, retention, training, and treatment. (E) An explanation of the assessment, monitoring, and evaluation mechanisms in place to assess the relevance, effectiveness, and sustainability of each specific initiative and progress made toward the intended outcomes identified under subparagraph (B). (F) Any other matter the Secretary considers appropriate. 1213. Extension of Commanders' Emergency Response Program Section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ( Public Law 112–81 Public Law 115–232 (1) in subsection (a), by striking December 31, 2019 December 31, 2020 (2) in subsection (b), by striking of fiscal years 2017 through 2019 for each of fiscal years 2017 through 2020 (3) in subsection (f), in the first sentence, by striking December 31, 2019 December 31, 2020 1214. Extension and modification of reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations Section 1233(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 ( Public Law 110–181 Public Law 115–232 (a) Authority From funds made available for the Department of Defense for the period beginning on October 1, 2019, and ending on December 31, 2020, for overseas contingency operations for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide activities, the Secretary of Defense may reimburse any key cooperating nation (other than Pakistan) for— (1) logistical and military support provided by that nation to or in connection with United States military operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, or Syria; and (2) logistical, military, and other support, including access, provided by that nation to or in connection with United States military operations described in paragraph (1). . 1215. Support for reconciliation activities led by the Government of Afghanistan (a) In general The Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, provide covered support for reconciliation activities to one or more designated persons or entities or Federal agencies. (b) Designation Not later than 15 days before the Secretary of Defense designates an individual or organization as a designated person or entity, the Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees of the intent of the Secretary to make such designation. (c) Reimbursement (1) Designated persons or entities The Secretary of Defense may provide covered support to a designated person or entity on a reimbursable or nonreimbursable basis. (2) Federal agencies The Secretary of Defense may provide covered support to a Federal agency on a reimbursable or nonreimbursable basis. (d) Location of covered support (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense may only provide covered support within Afghanistan. (2) Exception Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense may provide covered support in Pakistan if the Secretary determines, and certifies to the congressional defense committees, that providing covered support in Pakistan is in the national security interest of the United States. (e) Notification Not later than 15 days before the date on which the Secretary of Defense provides covered support to a nongovernmental designated person or entity or provides covered support in Pakistan, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees written notice that includes the intended recipient of such covered support and the specific covered support to be provided. (f) Funding (1) Source of funds Amounts for covered support may only be derived from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance. (2) Limitation Not more than $15,000,000 may be used for nonreimbursable covered support. (g) Rule of construction Covered support shall not be construed to violate section 2339, 2339A, or 2339B of title 18, United States Code. (h) Reports (1) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and quarterly thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Secretary of State, submit to the congressional defense committees a report on covered support during the preceding 90-day period. (2) Elements Each report under this subsection shall include, for the preceding reporting period, the following: (A) A summary of the ongoing reconciliation activities for which covered support was provided. (B) A description of the covered support, by class or type, and the designated person or entity or Federal agency that received each class or type of covered support. (C) The total dollar amount of each class or type of covered support, including budget details. (D) The intended duration of each provision of covered support. (E) Any other matter the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate. (i) Sunset The authority to carry out this section shall terminate on December 31, 2020. (j) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered support The term covered support (2) Designated person or entity (A) In general The term designated person or entity (B) Exclusion The term designated person or entity (3) Reconciliation activity The term reconciliation activity (4) Security The term security 1216. Sense of Senate on special immigrant visa program for Afghan allies It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) the special immigrant visa program for Afghan allies is critical to the mission in Afghanistan and the long-term interests of the United States; (2) maintaining a robust special immigrant visa program for Afghan allies is necessary to support United States Government personnel in Afghanistan who need translation, interpretation, security, and other services; (3) Afghan allies routinely risk their lives to assist United States military and diplomatic personnel; (4) honoring the commitments made to Afghan allies with respect to such special immigrant visa program is essential to ensuring the continued service and safety of such allies; and (5) an additional 4,000 visas should be made available to principal aliens who are eligible for special immigrant status under the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 ( 8 U.S.C. 1101 C Matters relating to Syria, Iraq, and Iran 1221. Modification of authority to provide assistance to vetted Syrian groups (a) Nature of assistance Subsection (a) of section 1209 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck Public Law 113–291 Public Law 115–232 (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking with a cost December 31, 2019 , and sustainment to appropriately vetted Syrian groups and individuals, through December 31, 2020 (2) in paragraph (1), by striking Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). (3) by striking paragraphs (2) and (3) and inserting the following new paragraphs: (2) Securing territory formerly controlled by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. (3) Protecting the United States and its friends and allies from the threats posed by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, al Qaeda, and associated forces in Syria. (4) Supporting the temporary detention and repatriation of Islamic State of Iraq and Syria foreign terrorist fighters in accordance with the laws of armed conflict and the United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, done at Geneva July 28, 1951 (as made applicable by the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, done at New York January 31, 1967 (19 UST 6223)). . (b) Scope of quarterly progress reports Subsection (d) of such section, as most recently amended by section 1223(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 (d) Quarterly progress reports (1) In general Beginning on January 15, 2020, and every 90 days thereafter, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership of the House of Representatives and the Senate a progress report. (2) Matters to be included Each progress report under paragraph (1) shall include, based on the most recent quarterly information, the following: (A) A description of the appropriately vetted recipients receiving assistance under subsection (a). (B) A description of training, equipment, supplies, stipends, and other support provided to appropriately vetted recipients under subsection (a) and a statement of the amount of funds expended for such purposes during the period covered by the report. (C) Any misuse or loss of provided training and equipment and how such misuse or loss is being mitigated. (D) An assessment of the recruitment, throughput, and retention rates of appropriately vetted recipients. (E) An assessment of the operational effectiveness of appropriately vetted recipients in meeting the purposes specified in subsection (a). (F) A description of United States Government stabilization objectives and activities carried out in areas formerly controlled by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, including significant projects and funding associated with such projects. (G) A description of coalition contributions to the purposes specified in subsection (a) and other related stabilization activities. (H) With respect to Islamic State of Iraq and Syria foreign terrorist fighters— (i) an estimate of the number of such individuals being detained by appropriately vetted Syrian groups and individuals; (ii) an estimate of the number of such individuals that have been repatriated and the countries to which such individuals have been repatriated; and (iii) a description of United States Government support provided to facilitate the repatriation of such individuals. (I) An assessment of the extent to which appropriately vetted Syrian groups and individuals have enabled progress toward establishing inclusive, representative, accountable, and civilian-led governance and security structures in territories liberated from the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. . (c) Elimination of reprogramming requirement Such section is further amended by striking subsection (f). (d) Inclusion of support for stabilization activities Such section is further amended by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f): (f) Support for stabilization activities (1) In general The Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State and in consultation with the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, provide support for the stabilization activities of the Department of State, the United States Agency for International Development, and any other Federal agency on a reimburseable or nonreimburseable basis. (2) Types of support The support provided under paragraph (1) may consist of— (A) logistic support, supplies, and services; or (B) equipment. . (e) Per project and aggregate cost limitations for construction and repair projects Subsection (l) of such section, as added by section 1223(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 (l) Limitation on cost of construction and repair projects (1) In general The cost of construction and repair projects carried out under this section may not exceed, in any fiscal year— (A) $4,000,000 per project; or (B) $12,000,000 in the aggregate. (2) Foreign contributions The limitation under paragraph (1) shall not apply to the expenditure of foreign contributions in excess of the per-project or aggregate limitation set forth in that paragraph. . (f) Inclusion of limitation pending report Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (n) Limitation pending report None of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for activities under this section until 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits an unclassified report, with a classified annex if necessary, to the congressional defense committees setting forth the following: (1) A description of the efforts the United States will undertake to train and equip appropriately vetted Syrian groups and individuals for the purposes described in subsection (a). (2) A detailed description of the appropriately vetted Syrian groups and individuals to be trained and equipped under this section, including a description of their geographical locations, demographic profiles, political affiliations, and current capabilities. (3) A detailed description of planned capabilities, including categories of training, equipment, financial support, sustainment, and supplies, intended to be provided to appropriately vetted Syrian groups and individuals under this section, and timelines for delivery. (4) A description of the planned posture of United States forces and the planned level of engagement by such forces with appropriately vetted Syrian groups and individuals, including the oversight of equipment provided under this section and the activities conducted by such appropriately vetted Syrian groups and individuals. (5) An explanation of the processes and mechanisms for local commanders of such forces to exercise command and control of the elements of the appropriately vetted Syrian groups and individuals after such elements have been trained and equipped under this section. (6) A detailed explanation of the relationship between appropriately vetted recipients and civilian governance authorities and a description of efforts to ensure appropriately vetted recipients are subject to the control of competent civilian authorities. . 1222. Extension of authority and limitation on use of funds to provide assistance to counter the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (a) Extension Subsection (a) of section 1236 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck Public Law 113–291 Public Law 115–232 December 31, 2020 December 31, 2021 (b) Funding Subsection (g) of such section, as most recently amended by section 1233(b) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, is further amended— (1) by striking fiscal year 2019 fiscal year 2020 (2) by striking $850,000,000 $645,000,000 (c) Limitation on use of funds Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 by this Act for activities under such section 1236, as amended by subsection (a), not more than $375,000,000 may be obligated or expended for such activities until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the following: (1) An identification of the specific units of the Iraqi Security Forces to receive training and equipment or other support in fiscal year 2020. (2) A plan for ensuring that any vehicles or equipment provided to the Iraqi Security Forces pursuant to such authority are maintained in subsequent fiscal years using funds of Iraq. (3) An estimate, by fiscal year, of the funding anticipated to be required for support of the Iraqi Security Forces during the five fiscal years beginning in fiscal year 2020. (4) A plan for normalizing assistance to the Iraqi Security Forces under chapter 16 (5) A detailed plan for the obligation and expenditure of the funds requested for fiscal year 2020 for the Department of Defense for stipends. (6) A plan for the transition to the Government of Iraq the responsibility for funding for stipends for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2020. 1223. Extension and modification of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq (a) Authority Section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 ( 10 U.S.C. 113 (1) by amending subsection (a) to read as follows: (a) Authority The Secretary of Defense may support United States Government security cooperation activities in Iraq by providing funds for operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq. ; (2) by striking subsection (f); (3) in subsection (g)(2), by striking subparagraph (F); and (4) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (f). (b) Types of support Subsection (b) of such section is amended by striking life support, transportation and personal security, and construction and renovation of facilities life support, transportation, and personal security (c) Amount available Such section is further amended— (1) in subsection (c)— (A) by striking fiscal year 2019 fiscal year 2020 (B) by striking $45,300,000 $30,000,000 (2) in subsection (d), by striking fiscal year 2019 fiscal year 2020 (d) Coverage of costs of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq Subsection (e) of such section is amended by striking activities of security assistance teams in Iraq in connection with such sale activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq in excess of the amount set forth in subsection (c) 1224. Coordinator of United States Government activities and matters in connection with detainees who are members of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (a) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, the Director of National Intelligence, and the Attorney General, designate an existing official within the Executive Branch to serve as senior-level coordinator to coordinate, in conjunction with the lead and other relevant agencies, all matters for the United States Government relating to the long-term disposition of members of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and associated forces (in this section referred to as ISIS detainees (1) repatriation, transfer, prosecution, and intelligence-gathering; and (2) all multilateral and international engagements led by the Department of State and other agencies that are related to the current and future handling, detention, and prosecution of ISIS detainees. (b) Retention of authority The appointment of a senior-level coordinator pursuant to subsection (a) shall not deprive any agency of any authority to independently perform functions of that agency. (c) Annual report (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and not less frequently than once each year thereafter through December 31, 2024, the individual designated under subsection (a) shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a detailed report regarding the following ISIS detainees: (A) Alexanda Kotey. (B) El Shafee Elsheikh. (C) Aine Lesley Davis. (D) Umm Sayyaf. (E) Any other high-value ISIS detainee that the coordinator reasonably determines to be subject to criminal prosecution in the United States. (2) Elements The report under paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, the following: (A) A detailed description of the facilities where ISIS detainees described in paragraph (1) are being held. (B) An analysis of all United States efforts to prosecute ISIS detainees described in paragraph (1) and the outcomes of such efforts. Any information, the disclosure of which may violate Department of Justice policy or law, relating to a prosecution or investigation may be withheld from a report under paragraph (1). (C) A detailed description of any option to expedite prosecution of any ISIS detainee described in paragraph (1), including in a court of competent jurisdiction outside of the United States. (D) An analysis of factors on the ground in Syria and Iraq that may result in the unintended release of ISIS detainees described in paragraph (1), and an assessment of any measures available to mitigate such releases. (E) A detailed description of all multilateral and other international efforts or proposals that would assist in the prosecution of ISIS detainees described in paragraph (1). (F) An analysis of all efforts between the United States and partner countries within the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS or other countries to share intelligence or evidence that may aid in the prosecution of members of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria and associated forces, and any legal obstacles that may hinder such efforts. (G) An analysis of the manner in which the United States Government communicates on such proposals and efforts to the families of United States citizens believed to be a victim of a criminal act by an ISIS detainee. (3) Form The report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (d) Appropriate committees of Congress defined In this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress (1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on the Judiciary, the Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on the Judiciary, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. 1225. Report on lessons learned from efforts to liberate Mosul and Raqqah from control of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (a) Report required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on lessons learned from coalition operations to liberate Mosul, Iraq, and Raqqah, Syria, from control of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). (b) Elements The report required by subsection (a) shall include a description of lessons learned in connection with each of the following: (1) Combat in densely populated urban environments. (2) Enablement of partner forces, including unique aspects of conducting combined operations with regular and irregular forces. (3) Advise, assist, and accompany efforts, including such efforts conducted remotely. (4) Integration of United States general purpose and special operations forces. (5) Integration of United States and international forces. (6) Irregular and unconventional warfare approaches, including the application of training and doctrine by special operations and general purpose forces. (7) Use of command, control, communications, computer, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance systems and techniques. (8) Logistics. (9) Information operations. (10) Targeting and weaponeering, including efforts to avoid civilian casualties and other collateral damage. (11) Facilitation of flows of internally displaced people and humanitarian assistance. (12) Such other matters as the Secretary considers appropriate and could benefit training, doctrine, and resourcing of future operations. (c) Form The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. D Matters relating to Europe and the Russian Federation 1231. Prohibition on availability of funds relating to sovereignty of the Russian Federation over Crimea (a) Prohibition None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to implement any activity that recognizes the sovereignty of the Russian Federation over Crimea. (b) Waiver The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may waive the prohibition under subsection (a) if the Secretary of Defense— (1) determines that a waiver is in the national security interest of the United States; and (2) on the date on which the waiver is invoked, submits a notification of the waiver and a justification of the reason for seeking the waiver to— (A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1232. Prohibition on use of funds for withdrawal of Armed Forces from Europe in the event of United States withdrawal from the North Atlantic Treaty Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if the President provides notice of withdrawal of the United States from the North Atlantic Treaty, done at Washington D.C. April 4, 1949, pursuant to Article 13 of the Treaty, during the one-year period beginning on the date of such notice, no funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be obligated, expended, or reprogrammed for the withdrawal of the United States Armed Forces from Europe. 1233. Extension of limitation on military cooperation between the United States and the Russian Federation Subsection (a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 Public Law 115–232 fiscal year 2017, 2018, or 2019 fiscal year 2017, 2018, 2019, or 2020 1234. Modification and extension of Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative Section 1250 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( Public Law 114–92 Public Law 115–232 (1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking in coordination with the Secretary of State with the concurrence of the Secretary of State (2) in subsection (b)— (A) by amending paragraph (11) to read as follows: (11) Air defense and coastal defense radars, and systems to support effective command and control and integration of air defense and coastal defense capabilities. ; (B) by redesignating paragraphs (14) and (15) as paragraphs (15) and (16), respectively; (C) by inserting after paragraph (13) the following new paragraph (14): (14) Coastal defense and anti-ship missile systems. ; and (D) in paragraph (15), as so redesignated, by striking paragraphs (1) through (13) paragraphs (1) through (14) (3) in subsection (c), by amending paragraph (5) to read as follows: (5) Lethal assistance Of the funds available for fiscal year 2020 pursuant to subsection (f)(5), $100,000,000 shall be available only for lethal assistance described in paragraphs (2), (3), (11), (12), and (14) of subsection (b). ; (4) in subsection (f), by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (5) For fiscal year 2020, $300,000,000. ; and (5) in subsection (h), by striking December 31, 2021 December 31, 2022 1235. Extension of authority for training for Eastern European national security forces in the course of multilateral exercises Subsection (h) of section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( 10 U.S.C. 333 (1) in the first sentence, by striking December 31, 2020 December 31, 2022 (2) in the second sentence, by striking for for the period beginning on October 1, 2015, and ending on December 31, 2020 for the period beginning on October 1, 2015, and ending on December 31, 2022 1236. Limitation on transfer of F–35 aircraft to the Republic of Turkey (a) Limitation Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense may be used to do the following: (1) Transfer, or facilitate the transfer of, F–35 aircraft to the territory of the Republic of Turkey. (2) Transfer equipment, intellectual property, or technical data necessary for or related to the maintenance or support of the F–35 aircraft in the territory of the Republic of Turkey. (3) Construct facilities for or otherwise associated with the storage of F–35 aircraft in the territory of the Republic of Turkey. (b) Waiver The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may waive the limitation under subsection (a) if the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a certification that the Government of Turkey— (1) has not accepted delivery of the S–400 air and missile defense system from the Russian Federation; and (2) has provided reliable assurances that the Government of Turkey will not accept delivery of the S–400 air and missile defense system from the Russian Federation in the future. 1237. Modifications of briefing, notification, and reporting requirements relating to non-compliance by the Russian Federation with its obligations under the INF Treaty (a) Briefing requirement Section 1244(d) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. Buck Public Law 113–291 22 U.S.C. 2593a (1) by striking At the time (A) In general At the time ; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (B) Sunset The briefing requirement under subparagraph (A) shall be in effect so long as the INF Treaty remains in force. . (b) Notification requirement relating to coordination with allies Section 1243(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( Public Law 114–92 (3) Sunset The notification requirement under paragraph (1) shall be in effect so long as the INF Treaty remains in force. . (c) Notification requirement relating to development, deployment, or test of a system inconsistent with INF Treaty Section 1244(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 22 U.S.C. 2593a (3) Sunset The notification requirement under paragraph (1) shall be in effect so long as the INF Treaty remains in force. . (d) Reporting requirement under Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 Section 10(c) of the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 ( 22 U.S.C. 8929 (3) Sunset The reporting requirement under paragraph (1) shall be in effect so long as the INF Treaty remains in force. . 1238. Extension and modification of security assistance for Baltic nations for joint program for interoperability and deterrence against aggression (a) Additional defense articles and services Subsection (c) of section 1279D of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 22 U.S.C. 2753 (1) by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (6); and (2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph (5): (5) Command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR) equipment. . (b) Funding Subsection (f) of such section is amended— (1) in paragraph (2), by striking $100,000,000 $125,000,000 (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) Matching amount The amount of assistance provided under subsection (a) for procurement described in subsection (b) may not exceed the aggregate amount contributed to such procurement by the Baltic nations. . (c) Extension Subsection (g) of such section is amended by striking December 31, 2020 December 31, 2022 1239. Report on North Atlantic Treaty Organization Readiness Initiative (a) Report Not later than October 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Readiness Initiative, which shall include assessments of the following: (1) The number of units North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies have pledged against the benchmark to provide an additional 30 air attack squadrons, 30 naval combat vessels, and 30 mechanized battalions ready to fight in not more than 30 days. (2) The procedure by which the North Atlantic Treaty Organization certifies, reports, and ensures that the Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) maintains a detailed understanding of the readiness of the forces described in paragraph (1). (3) The North Atlantic Treaty Organization plan to maintain the readiness of such forces in future years. (b) Form The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 1240. Reports on contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (a) In general Beginning in 2020, and annually thereafter through 2025, not later than 30 days after the date on which the annual report of the Secretary General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization for the preceding calendar year is published, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Commander of United States European Command, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that includes the following: (1) A link to an electronic version of such annual report of the Secretary General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. (2) A summary of the key findings of such annual report. (3) A description of the significant financial contributions by member countries of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization that support the presence or operations of the United States Armed Forces in Europe. (4) An assessment of the progress of each member country of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization toward meeting the North Atlantic Treaty Organization capability targets for such member country. (5) An assessment of North Atlantic Treaty Organization capability and capacity shortfalls that may be addressed through investment by North Atlantic Treaty Organization member countries that have not met the Defense Investment Pledge made at the 2014 summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in Wales. (6) A description of the contribution of each member country of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to the NATO Readiness Initiative. (7) A description of— (A) the personnel and financial contributions of each member country of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to military or stability operations in which the United States Armed Forces are a participant; and (B) any limitation placed by such member country on the use of such contributions. (8) An assessment of the compatibility and alignment of United States and North Atlantic Treaty Organization contingency plans, including recommendations to reduce the risk of executing such plans. (9) An assessment of current North Atlantic Treaty Organization initiatives, and any recommendations for future reforms or initiatives, to accelerate the speed of decision and deployability of North Atlantic Treaty Organization forces. (b) Form Each report under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (c) Appropriate committees of Congress defined In this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress (1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1241. Future years plans for European Deterrence Initiative (a) Plan required (1) Initial plan (A) In general Not later than December 31, 2019, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Commander of the United States European Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a future years plan on activities and resources of the European Deterrence Initiative (EDI) for fiscal year 2020 and not fewer than the four succeeding fiscal years. (B) Matters to be included The plan required under subparagraph (A) shall include the following: (i) A description of the objectives of the European Deterrence Initiative, including a description of— (I) the intended force structure and posture of the assigned and allocated forces within the area of responsibility of the United States European Command for the last fiscal year of the plan; and (II) the manner in which such force structure and posture support the implementation of the National Defense Strategy. (ii) An assessment of capabilities requirements to achieve the objectives of the European Deterrence Initiative. (iii) An assessment of logistics requirements, including personnel, equipment, supplies, storage, and maintenance needs, to achieve the objectives of the European Deterrence Initiative. (iv) An identification of required infrastructure and military construction investments to achieve the objectives of the European Deterrence Initiative, including potential infrastructure investments by host nations. (v) An assessment of security cooperation investments required to achieve the objectives of the European Deterrence Initiative. (vi) A plan to fully resource United States force posture and capabilities, including— (I) a detailed assessment of the resources necessary to address the requirements described in clauses (i) through (v), including specific cost estimates for each project in the European Deterrence Initiative to support increased presence, exercises and training, enhanced prepositioning, improved infrastructure, and building partnership capacity; and (II) a detailed timeline to achieve the intended force structure and posture described in clause (i)(I). (2) Subsequent plan (A) In general Not later than the date on which the Secretary submits to Congress the budget request for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2021, the Secretary, in consultation with the Commander of the United States European Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a future years plan on activities and resources of the European Deterrence Initiative for fiscal year 2021 and not fewer than the four succeeding fiscal years. (B) Matters to be included The plan required under subparagraph (A) shall include— (i) the matters described in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1); and (ii) a detailed explanation of any significant modifications in requirements or resources, as compared to the plan submitted under that paragraph. (b) Form The plans required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 1242. Modification of reporting requirements relating to the Open Skies Treaty (a) Plan for implementation flights Section 1235(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) by striking the President the Secretary of Defense (B) by striking with respect to such fiscal year with respect to the calendar year in which the flight is to be conducted (2) in paragraph (2), by striking during such fiscal year during such calendar year (3) in paragraph (3), by striking with respect to a fiscal year with respect to a calendar year (b) Quarterly reports on observation flights by the Russian Federation (1) In general Paragraph (1) of subsection (c) of section 1236 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 on a quarterly basis on an annual basis (2) Conforming amendment Such subsection is further amended, in the subsection heading, by striking Quarterly Annual 1243. Report on nuclear weapons of the Russian Federation and nuclear modernization of the People's Republic of China (a) In general Not later than February 15, 2020, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that includes the following: (1) An assessment of the deployed nuclear weapons of the Russian Federation not covered by the New START Treaty. (2) An assessment of the nuclear weapons of the Russian Federation in development that would not be covered by the New START Treaty. (3) An assessment of the strategic nuclear weapons of the Russian Federation that are not deployed. (4) An assessment of the efforts of the People's Republic of China with respect to nuclear modernization. (5) The implications of such assessments with respect to the limitations on strategic weapons of the United States and the Russian Federation under the New START Treaty. (b) Form The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate committees of Congress The term appropriate committees of Congress (A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. (2) New START Treaty The term New START Treaty 1244. Sense of Senate on the 70th anniversary of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Commemorating the 70th anniversary of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the Senate— (1) recognizes the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as the most successful military alliance in history, founded on the principles of democracy, individual liberty, and the rule of law; (2) commends the singular contributions of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to the security, prosperity, and freedom of its members; (3) upholds membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a cornerstone of the security and national defense of the United States; (4) affirms the ironclad commitment of the United States to uphold its obligations under the North Atlantic Treaty, including under Article 5 of such treaty; (5) honors the contributions of North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies to the security of the United States, including the invocation of Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks against the United States; (6) urges North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies to uphold their obligations under Article 3 of the North Atlantic Treaty to maintain and develop their individual and collective capacity to resist armed attack (7) notes the commitment of North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies to contribute to strengthening their free institutions, bringing about a better understanding of the principles on which such institutions are founded and promoting conditions of stability and well-being; and (8) welcomes efforts to reform and modernize the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to meet current and future threats, including though accelerated modernization, improved readiness, command structure adaptation, and increased speed of alliance decision-making. 1245. Sense of Senate on United States force posture in Europe and the Republic of Poland It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) the 2018 National Defense Strategy identifies long-term strategic competition with the Russian Federation as a principal priority for the Department of Defense that requires increased and sustained investment; (2) despite significant progress through the European Deterrence Initiative, the current force posture of the United States is not yet sufficient to support the National Defense Strategy; (3) due to the geostrategic location and capabilities of the armed forces of the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Poland is critical to deterring, defending against, and defeating Russian aggression against North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies in Central and Eastern Europe; and (4) the United States should increase the persistent presence of United States forces in the Republic of Poland, including key combat enabler units such as warfighting headquarters elements— (A) to enhance deterrence against Russian aggression; and (B) to reduce the risk of executing Department of Defense contingency plans. 1246. Sense of Senate on United States partnership with the Republic of Georgia It is the sense of the Senate that the United States should— (1) promote the enduring strategic partnership of the United States with the Republic of Georgia; (2) support robust security sector assistance for the Republic of Georgia, including defensive lethal assistance— (A) to strengthen the defense capabilities and readiness of the Republic of Georgia; (B) to improve interoperability with North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) forces; and (C) to bolster deterrence against aggression by the Russian Federation; (3) enhance security in the Black Sea region by increasing engagement and security cooperation with Black Sea countries, including by increasing the frequency, scale, and scope of North Atlantic Treaty Organization and other multilateral exercises in the Black Sea region with the participation of the Republic of Georgia and Ukraine; and (4) affirm support for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization open door policy, including the eventual membership of the Republic of Georgia in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. E Matters relating to the Indo-Pacific region 1251. Limitation on use of funds to reduce the total number of members of the Armed Forces in the territory of the Republic of Korea None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be used to reduce the total number of members of the Armed Forces in the territory of the Republic of Korea below 28,500 until 90 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees the following: (1) Such a reduction is in the national security interest of the United States and will not significantly undermine the security of United States allies in the region. (2) Such a reduction is commensurate with a reduction in the threat posed to the security of the United States and its allies in the region by the conventional military forces of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. (3) The Secretary has appropriately consulted with allies of the United States, including the Republic of Korea and Japan, regarding such a reduction. 1252. Expansion of Indo-Pacific Maritime Security Initiative Section 1263(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( 10 U.S.C. 333 (8) The Federated States of Micronesia. (9) The Kingdom of Tonga. (10) Papua New Guinea. (11) The Republic of Fiji. (12) The Republic of the Marshall Islands. (13) The Republic of Palau. (14) The Republic of Vanuatu. (15) The Solomon Islands. . 1253. Modification of annual report on military and security developments involving the People's Republic of China Paragraph (26) of section 1202(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 ( 10 U.S.C. 113 (26) The relationship between Chinese overseas investment, including the Belt and Road Initiative and the Digital Silk Road, and Chinese security and military strategy objectives, including— (A) an assessment of Chinese investments or projects likely, or with significant potential, to be converted into military assets of the People’s Republic of China; (B) an assessment of Chinese investments or projects of greatest concern with respect to United States national security interests; (C) a description of any Chinese investment or project linked to military cooperation with the country in which the investment or project is located, such as cooperation on satellite navigation or arms production; and (D) an assessment of any Chinese investment or project, and any associated agreement, that— (i) presents significant financial risk for the country in which the investment or project is located; or (ii) may undermine the sovereignty of such country. . 1254. Report on resourcing United States defense requirements for the Indo-Pacific region (a) Report required (1) In general Not later than January 31, 2020, the Commander of United States Indo-Pacific Command shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the independent assessment of the Commander with respect to the activities and resources required, for fiscal years 2022 through 2026, to achieve the following objectives: (A) The implementation of the National Defense Strategy with respect to the Indo-Pacific region. (B) The maintenance or restoration of the comparative military advantage of the United States with respect to the People's Republic of China. (C) The reduction of the risk of executing contingency plans of the Department of Defense. (2) Matters to be included The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A description of the intended force structure and posture of assigned and allocated forces within the area of responsibility of United States Indo-Pacific Command for fiscal year 2026 to achieve the objectives described in paragraph (1). (B) An assessment of capabilities requirements to achieve such objectives. (C) An assessment of logistics requirements, including personnel, equipment, supplies, storage, and maintenance needs to achieve such objectives. (D) An identification of required infrastructure and military construction investments to achieve such objectives. (E) An assessment of security cooperation activities or resources required to achieve such objectives. (F) A plan to fully resource United States force posture and capabilities, including— (i) a detailed assessment of the resources necessary to address the elements described in subparagraphs (A) through (E), including specific cost estimates for priority investments or projects— (I) to increase joint force lethality; (II) to enhance force design and posture; (III) to support a robust exercise, experimentation, and innovation program; and (IV) to strengthen cooperation with allies and partners; and (ii) a detailed timeline to achieve the intended force structure and posture described in subparagraph (A). (3) Form The report required under paragraph (1) may be submitted in classified form, but shall include an unclassified summary. (4) Availability On submittal of the report to the congressional defense committees, the Commander of United States Indo-Pacific Command shall make the report available to the Secretary of Defense, the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Secretaries of the military departments, and the chiefs of staff of each military service. (b) Briefings required (1) Initial briefing Not later than March 15, 2020, the Secretary of Defense, the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall provide to the congressional defense committees a joint briefing, and documents as appropriate, with respect to their assessments of the report submitted under subsection (a), including their assessments of the feasibility and advisability of the plan required by paragraph (2)(F) of that subsection. (2) Subsequent briefing Not later than March 31, 2020, the Secretary of the Air Force, the Secretary of the Army, and the Secretary of the Navy shall provide to the congressional defense committees a joint briefing, and documents as appropriate, with respect to their assessments of the report submitted under subsection (a), including their assessments of the feasibility and advisability of the plan required by paragraph (2)(F) of that subsection. 1255. Report on distributed lay-down of United States forces in the Indo-Pacific region (a) Review Acknowledging the pressing need to reduce the presence of the United States Marine Corps on Okinawa, Japan, and to accelerate adjustments to United States force posture in the Indo-Pacific region, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Government of Japan and other foreign governments as necessary, shall conduct a review of the planned distribution of members of the United States Armed Forces in Okinawa, Guam, Hawaii, Australia, and elsewhere that is contemplated in support of the joint statement of the United States-Japan Security Consultative Committee issued April 26, 2012, in the District of Columbia (April 27, 2012, in Tokyo, Japan) and revised on October 3, 2013, in Tokyo, hereafter referred to as the distributed lay-down (b) Elements The review required by subsection (a) shall include an updated analysis of the distributed lay-down, including— (1) an assessment of the impact of the distributed lay-down on the ability of the Armed Forces to respond to current and future contingencies in the area of responsibility of United States Indo-Pacific Command that reflects contingency plans of the Department of the Defense; (2) the projected total cost, including any past or projected changes in cost; (3) a description of the adequacy of current and expected training resources at each location associated with the distributed lay-down, including the ability to train against the full spectrum of threats from near-peer or peer threats any projected limitations due to political, environmental, or other limiting factors; (4) an assessment of political support for United States force presence from host countries and local communities and populations; (5) an analysis of growth potential for increased force size or training; and (6) an updated and detailed description of any military construction projects required to execute the distributed lay-down. (c) Certification Not later than 15 days after the completion of the review required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees— (1) a certification that the Department of Defense will continue implementation of the distributed lay-down; or (2) a notification that the Department of Defense intends to seek revisions to the distributed lay-down in consultation with the Government of Japan. (d) Report Not later than 120 days after the completion of the review required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall provide the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the review, including— (1) a detailed description of any recommendations for revisions to the distributed lay-down such as alternative locations for basing in Alaska, Hawaii, the continental United States, Japan, and Oceania; and (2) an assessment of the results of the review and recommendations described in paragraph (1) by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (e) Comptroller general report Not later than 120 days after the submission of the report required by subsection (d), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing an analysis of the current status of the distributed lay-down, the review described in subsection (a), and the report described in subsection (d). 1256. Sense of Senate on the United States-Japan alliance and defense cooperation It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) the United States-Japan alliance remains the cornerstone of peace and security for a free and open Indo-Pacific region; (2) although the United States Government does not take a position on sovereignty of the Senkaku Islands, the United States acknowledges that the islands are under the administration of Japan and opposes any unilateral actions that would seek to undermine their administration by Japan; (3) the unilateral actions of a third party will not affect United States acknowledgment of the administration of Japan over the Senkaku Islands, and the United States remains committed under the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security with Japan to respond to any armed attack in the territories under the administration of Japan; (4) Japan continues to make contributions to regional security and prosperity that make the United States safer and more prosperous; (5) the Government of Japan has played a critical leadership role in promoting a free and open Indo-Pacific, which is a primary objective of United States national security policy, including through its efforts concerning trade, investment, energy, rule of law, and good governance; (6) the Government of Japan has been instrumental improving cooperation between the United States, Japan, Australia, and India as well as improving relations with countries in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations; (7) the Government of Japan has been a strong supporter of United States efforts to achieve the complete and verifiable denuclearization of North Korea, and has played a leading role in enforcing United Nations Security Council Resolution sanctions against North Korea; (8) the Government of Japan has taken significant steps to enhance military capabilities for its own defense while increasing its contributions to collective security, including through passage of legislation concerning collective self-defense, the publication of the National Defense Program Guidelines and the Mid-Term Defense Program, and record investments in advanced defense capabilities in the maritime, air, space, and cyber domains; (9) while it should continue to increase its defense spending in order to make a greater contribution to allied defense capabilities, the Government of Japan has made among the most significant burden sharing (10) upcoming negotiations concerning a new Special Measures Agreement between the United States and Japan should be conducted in a spirit consistent with prior negotiations on the basis of common interest and mutual respect; and (11) the United States and Japan should take actions to enhance United States-Japan defense cooperation, including through increased use of combined bases for allied operations, further integration of allied command structures, consideration of the establishment of a combined joint task force, enhanced combined contingency planning for both conventional conflict and so-called gray zone 1257. Sense of Senate on enhancement of the United States-Taiwan defense relationship It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) the Taiwan Relations Act ( 22 U.S.C. 3301 Six Assurances (2) the United States should strengthen defense and security cooperation with Taiwan to support the development of capable, ready, and modern defense forces necessary for Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability; (3) the United States should strongly support the acquisition by Taiwan of defense articles and services through foreign military sales, direct commercial sales, and industrial cooperation, with an emphasis on anti-ship, coastal defense, anti-armor, air defense, undersea warfare, advanced command, control, communications, computer, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR), and resilient command and control capabilities that support the asymmetric defense strategy of Taiwan; (4) the President and Congress should determine the nature and quantity of such defense articles and services based solely upon their judgment of the needs of Taiwan as required by the Taiwan Relations Act; (5) the United States should continue efforts to improve the predictability of United States arms sales to Taiwan by ensuring timely review of and response to requests of Taiwan for defense articles and services; (6) the Secretary of Defense should promote policies concerning exchanges that enhance the security of Taiwan including— (A) opportunities with Taiwan for practical training and military exercises that— (i) enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability, as described in section 3(a) of the Taiwan Relations Act ( 22 U.S.C. 3302(a) (ii) emphasize capabilities consistent with the asymmetric defense strategy of Taiwan; (B) exchanges between senior defense officials and general officers of the United States and Taiwan, consistent with the Taiwan Travel Act ( Public Law 115–135 (C) opportunities for exchanges between junior officers and senior enlisted personnel of the United States and Taiwan; (7) the United States and Taiwan should expand cooperation in humanitarian assistance and disaster relief; (8) the Secretary of Defense should consider supporting the visit of a United States hospital ship to Taiwan as part of the annual Pacific Partnership (9) the Secretary of Defense should continue regular transits of United States Navy vessels through the Taiwan Strait, commend the armed forces of France for their April 6, 2019, legal transit of the Taiwan Strait, and encourage allies and partners to follow suit in conducting such transits, in order to demonstrate the commitment of the United States and its allies and partners to fly, sail, and operate anywhere international law allows. 1258. Sense of Senate on United States-India defense relationship It is the sense of the Senate that the United States should strengthen and enhance its major defense partnership with India and work toward the following mutual security objectives: (1) Expanding engagement in multilateral frameworks, including the quadrilateral dialogue among the United States, India, Japan, and Australia, to promote regional security and defend shared values and common interests in the rules-based order. (2) Increasing the frequency and scope of exchanges between senior civilian officials and military officers of the United States and India to support the development and implementation of the major defense partnership. (3) Exploring additional steps to implement the major defense partner designation to better facilitate interoperability, information sharing, and appropriate technology transfers. (4) Pursuing strategic initiatives to help develop the defense capabilities of India. (5) Conducting additional combined exercises with India in the Persian Gulf, Indian Ocean, and western Pacific regions. (6) Furthering cooperative efforts to promote stability and security in Afghanistan. 1259. Sense of Senate on security commitments to the Governments of Japan and the Republic of Korea and trilateral cooperation among the United States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) the United States remains committed to its alliances with Japan and the Republic of Korea, which are— (A) the cornerstones of peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region; and (B) based on the shared values of democracy, the rule of law, free and open markets, and respect for human rights; (2) cooperation among the United States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea is essential for confronting global challenges, including— (A) preventing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction; (B) combating piracy; (C) assisting victims of conflict and disaster worldwide; (D) protecting maritime security; and (E) ensuring freedom of navigation, commerce, and overflight in the Indo-Pacific region; (3) the United States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea share deep concern that the nuclear and ballistic missile programs, the conventional military capabilities, and the chemical and biological weapons programs of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, together with the long history of aggression and provocation by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, pose grave threats to peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and in the Indo-Pacific region; (4) the United States welcomes greater security cooperation with and between Japan and the Republic of Korea to promote mutual interests and address shared concerns, including— (A) the bilateral military intelligence-sharing pact between Japan and the Republic of Korea, signed on November 23, 2016; and (B) the trilateral intelligence sharing agreement among the United States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea, signed on December 29, 2015; and (5) recognizing that the security of the United States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea are intertwined because they face common threats, including from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the United States welcomes and encourages deeper trilateral defense coordination and cooperation, including through expanded exercises, training, senior-level exchanges, and information sharing. 1260. Sense of Senate on enhanced cooperation with Pacific Island countries to establish open-source intelligence fusion centers in the Indo-Pacific region It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) the Pacific Island countries in the Indo-Pacific region are critical partners of the United States; (2) the United States should take steps to enhance collaboration with Pacific Island countries; and (3) United States Indo-Pacific Command should pursue the establishment of one or more open-source intelligence fusion centers in the Indo-Pacific region to enhance cooperation with Pacific Island countries, which may include participation in an existing fusion center of a partner or ally in lieu of establishing an entirely new fusion center. 1261. Sense of Senate on enhancing defense and security cooperation with the Republic of Singapore It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) the United States and the Republic of Singapore have built a strong, enduring, and forward-looking strategic partnership based on long-standing and mutually beneficial cooperation, including through security, defense, economic, and people-to-people ties; (2) robust security cooperation between the United States and the Republic of Singapore is crucial to promoting peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region; (3) the status of the Republic of Singapore as a major security cooperation partner of the United States, as recognized in the 2005 Strategic Framework Agreement between the United States and the Republic of Singapore for a Closer Partnership in Defense and Security, plays an important role in the global network of strategic partnerships, especially in promoting maritime security and countering terrorism; (4) the United States highly values the Republic of Singapore's provision of access to its military facilities, which supports the continued security presence of the United States in Southeast Asia and across the Indo-Pacific region; (5) the United States should continue to welcome the presence of the Singapore Armed Forces in the United States for exercises and training, and should consider opportunities to expand such activities at additional locations in the United States, as appropriate; and (6) as the United States and the Republic of Singapore negotiate the renewal of the 1990 Memorandum of Understanding Regarding the United States Use of Facilities in Singapore, the United States should— (A) continue to enhance defense and security cooperation with the Republic of Singapore to promote peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region based on common interests and shared values; (B) reinforce the status of the Republic of Singapore as a major security cooperation partner of the United States; (C) enhance defense cooperation in the military, policy, strategic, and technological spheres, especially concerning maritime security and counterterrorism, counterpiracy, humanitarian assistance and disaster relief, cybersecurity, and biosecurity; and (D) explore additional steps to better facilitate military interoperability and information sharing through appropriate technology transfers. F Reports 1271. Report on cost imposition strategy (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the cost imposition strategies of the Department of Defense with respect to the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation. (b) Elements The report under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A description of the manner in which the future-years defense program and current operational concepts of the Department are designed to impose costs on the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation, including— (A) political, economic, monetary, human capital, and technology costs; and (B) costs associated with military efficiency and effectiveness. (2) A description of the policies and processes of the Department relating to the development and execution of cost imposition strategies. (c) Form The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted in classified form, and shall include an unclassified summary. G Other matters 1281. NATO Special Operations Headquarters Section 1244 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( Public Law 111–84 Public Law 114–92 (1) in subsection (a), by striking each of fiscal years 2013 through 2020 each of fiscal years 2013 through 2025 (2) by striking subsection (c); and (3) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (c). 1282. Modifications of authorities relating to acquisition and cross-servicing agreements (a) Reimbursement for cost of logistic support, supplies, and services Subsection (a) of section 2342 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (2), by striking in return for (A) the reciprocal provisions of logistic support, supplies, and services by such government or organization to elements of the armed forces; or (B) cash reimbursement for the fully burdened cost of the logistic support, supplies, and services provided by the United States. ; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (3) A reciprocal transaction for logistic support, supplies, and services shall be reconciled not later than one year after the date on which the transaction occurs, at which time the Secretary of Defense shall seek cash reimbursement for the fully burdened cost of the logistic support, supplies, and services provided by the United States that has not been offset by the value of the logistic support, supplies, and services provided by the recipient government or organization. (4) An agreement entered into under this section shall require any accrued credits or liabilities resulting from an unequal exchange of logistic support, supplies, and services to be liquidated not less frequently than once every five years. . (b) Designation and notice of intent to enter into agreement with non-NATO country Subsection (b) of such section is amended to read as follows: (b) (1) The Secretary of Defense may not designate a country for an agreement under this section unless— (A) the Secretary, after consultation with the Secretary of State, determines that the designation of such country for such purpose is in the interest of the national security of the United States; and (B) in the case of a country that is not a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the Secretary submits to the appropriate committees of Congress notice of the intended designation not less than 30 days before the date on which such country is designated by the Secretary under subsection (a). (2) In the case of a country that is not a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the Secretary of Defense may not enter into an agreement under this section unless the Secretary submits to the appropriate committees of Congress a notice of intent to enter into such an agreement not less than 30 days before the date on which the Secretary enters into the agreement. . (c) Oversight and monitoring responsibilities Such section is further amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (f) through (h) as subsections (g) through (i), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f): (f) (1) The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy shall have primary responsibility within the Office of the Secretary of Defense for oversight of agreements entered into and activities carried out under the authority of this subchapter. (2) The Director of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency shall have primary responsibility for— (A) monitoring the implementation of such agreements; and (B) accounting for logistic support, supplies, and services received or provided under such authority. . (d) Regulations Subsection (g) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (c)(1), is amended to read as follows: (g) (1) Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations to ensure that— (A) contracts entered into under this subchapter are free from self-dealing, bribery, and conflict of interests; (B) adequate processes and controls are in place to provide for the accurate accounting of logistic support, supplies, and services received or provided under the authority of this subchapter; and (C) personnel responsible for accounting for logistic support, supplies, and services received or provided under such authority are fully trained and aware of such responsibilities. (2) (A) Not later than 270 days after the issuance of the regulations under paragraph (1), the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a review of the implementation by the Secretary of such regulations. (B) The review conducted under subparagraph (A) shall— (i) assess the effectiveness of such regulations and the implementation of such regulations to ensure the effective management and oversight of an agreement under subsection (a)(1); and (ii) include any other matter the Comptroller General considers relevant. . (e) Reports Subsection (h) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (c)(1), is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting in effect that have entered into force or were applied provisionally (2) in paragraph (2)— (A) by striking date on which the Secretary (A) pursuant to subsection (b)(1)(B) of the designation of such country under subsection (a); and (B) pursuant to subsection (b)(2) of the intent of the Secretary to enter into the agreement. ; (3) by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows: (3) With respect to each such agreement, the dollar amounts of— (A) each class or type of logistic support, supplies, and services provided in the preceding fiscal year; and (B) reciprocal provisions of logistic support, supplies, and services, or cash reimbursements, received in such fiscal year. ; (4) by amending paragraph (4) to read as follows: (4) With respect to each such agreement, the dollar amounts of— (A) each class or type of logistic support, supplies, and services received; and (B) reciprocal provisions of logistic support, supplies, and services, or cash reimbursements provided. ; (5) by striking paragraph (5); and (6) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (5) With respect to any transaction for logistic support, supplies, and services that has not been reconciled more than one year after the date on which the transaction occurred, a description of the transaction that includes the following: (A) The date on which the transaction occurred. (B) The country or organization to which logistic support, supplies, and services were provided. (C) The value of the transaction. (6) An explanation of any waiver granted under section 2347(c) during the preceding fiscal year, including an identification of the relevant contingency operation or non-combat operation. . 1283. Modification of authority for United States-Israel anti-tunnel cooperation activities (a) In general Subsection (a) of section 1279 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( 22 U.S.C. 8606 and to establish capabilities for countering unmanned aerial systems (b) Exception to matching contribution requirement Subsection (b)(3) of such section is amended— (1) by striking Support (A) In general Except as provided in subparagraph (B), support ; and (2) by adding at the end the following: (B) Exception Subject to paragraph (4), the Secretary may use amounts available to the Secretary in excess of the amount contributed by the Government of Israel to provide support under this subsection for costs associated with any unique national requirement identified by the United States with respect to anti-tunnel capabilities. . 1284. United States-Israel cooperation to counter unmanned aerial systems (a) Authority to establish capabilities to counter unmanned aerial systems (1) In general The Secretary of Defense, upon request of the Ministry of Defense of Israel and in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, is authorized to carry out research, development, test, and evaluation, on a joint basis with Israel, to establish capabilities for countering unmanned aerial systems that threaten the United States or Israel. Any activities carried out pursuant to such authority shall be conducted in a manner that appropriately protects sensitive technology and information and the national security interests of the United States and Israel. (2) Report The activities described in paragraph (1) and subsection (b) may not be carried out until after the Secretary of Defense submits to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth the following: (A) A memorandum of agreement between the United States and Israel regarding sharing of research and development costs for the capabilities described in paragraph (1), and any supporting documents. (B) A certification that the memorandum of agreement— (i) requires sharing of costs of projects, including in-kind support, between the United States and Israel; (ii) establishes a framework to negotiate the rights to any intellectual property developed under the memorandum of agreement; and (iii) requires the United States Government to receive semiannual reports on expenditure of funds, if any, by the Government of Israel, including a description of what the funds have been used for, when funds were expended, and an identification of entities that expended the funds. (b) Support in connection with the program (1) In general The Secretary of Defense is authorized to provide maintenance and sustainment support to Israel for the research, development, test, and evaluation activities authorized in subsection (a)(1). Such authority includes authority to install equipment necessary to carry out such research, development, test, and evaluation. (2) Report Support may not be provided under paragraph (1) until 15 days after the Secretary submits to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth a detailed description of the support to be provided. (3) Matching contribution (A) In general Except as provided in subparagraph (B), support may not be provided under this subsection unless the Government of Israel contributes an amount not less than the amount of support to be so provided to the program, project, or activity for which the support is to be so provided in the calendar year in which the support is provided. (B) Exception Subject to paragraph (4), the Secretary may use amounts available to the Secretary in excess of the amount contributed by the Government of Israel to provide support under this subsection for costs associated with any unique national requirement identified by the United States with respect to countering unmanned aerial systems. (4) Annual limitation on amount The amount of support provided under this subsection in any year may not exceed $25,000,000. (5) Use of certain amounts for RDT&E activities in the United States Of the amount provided by the United States in support under paragraph (1), not less than 50 percent of such amount shall be used for research, development, test, and evaluation activities in the United States in connection with such support. (c) Lead agency The Secretary of Defense shall designate an appropriate research and development entity of a military department as the lead agency of the Department of Defense in carrying out this section. (d) Semiannual reports The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress on a semiannual basis a report that contains a copy of the most recent semiannual report provided by the Government of Israel to the Department of Defense pursuant to subsection (a)(2)(B)(iii). (e) Appropriate committees of Congress defined In this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress (1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Homeland Security, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Homeland Security, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. (f) Sunset The authority in this section to carry out activities described in subsection (a), and to provide support described in subsection (b), shall expire on December 31, 2024. 1285. Modification of initiative to support protection of national security academic researchers from undue influence and other security threats Section 1286(c) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (8) A list, developed in consultation with the Bureau of Industry and Security of the Department of Commerce, the Director of National Intelligence, and United States academic institutions that conduct significant Department of Defense research or engineering activities, of academic institutions of the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation that— (A) are associated with a defense program of the People's Republic of China or the Russian Federation, including any university heavily engaged in military research; (B) are known— (i) to recruit individuals for the purpose of advancing the talent and capabilities of such a defense program; or (ii) to provide misleading transcripts or otherwise attempt to conceal the connections of an individual or institution to such a defense program; or (C) pose a serious risk of intangible transfers of defense or engineering technology and research. . 1286. Independent assessment of human rights situation in Honduras (a) Assessment required (1) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall select and enter into an agreement with an independent think tank or a federally funded research and development center to conduct an analysis and assessment of the compliance of the military and security forces of Honduras with international human rights laws and standards. (2) Matters to be included The assessment under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A description of the military-to-military activities between the United States and Honduras, including the manner in which Department of Defense engagement with the military and security forces of Honduras supports the National Defense Strategy. (B) An analysis and assessment of the activities of the military and security forces of Honduras with respect to human rights activists. (C) With respect to United States national security interests, an analysis and assessment of the challenges posed by corruption within the military and security forces of Honduras. (D) An analysis of— (i) the security assistance provided to Honduras by the Department of Defense during the 7-year period preceding the date of the enactment of this Act; and (ii) the extent to which such assistance has improved accountability, transparency, and compliance to international human rights laws and standards in the security and military operations of the Government of Honduras. (E) Recommendations on the development of future security assistance to Honduras that prioritizes— (i) compliance of the military and security forces of Honduras with human rights laws and standards; (ii) citizen security; and (iii) the advancement of United States national security interests with respect to countering the proliferation of illegal narcotics flows through Honduras. (F) Any other matters the Secretary considers necessary and relevant to United States national security interests. (b) Report Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the entity selected under subsection (a) shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the results of the assessment conducted under that subsection. (c) Department of Defense support The Secretary shall provide the entity selected under subsection (a) with timely access to appropriate information, data, and analyses necessary to carry out the assessment in a thorough and independent manner. (d) Appropriate committees of Congress defined In this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress (1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1287. United States Central Command posture review (a) Comprehensive review required (1) In general To clarify the near-term policy and strategy of the United States under the National Defense Strategy with respect to United States Central Command, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, as appropriate, shall conduct a comprehensive review of United States military force posture and capabilities in the United States Central Command area of responsibility during the posture review period. (2) Elements The review conducted under paragraph (1) shall include, for the posture review period, the following elements: (A) An assessment of the threats and challenges in the United States Central Command area of responsibility, including threats and challenges posed to United States interests by near-peer competitors. (B) An explanation of the policy and strategic frameworks for addressing the threats and challenges identified under subparagraph (A). (C) An identification of current and future United States military force posture and capabilities necessary to counter threats, deter conflict, and defend United States national security interests in the United States Central Command area of responsibility. (D) An assessment of the basing, cooperative security locations, and other infrastructure necessary to support steady state operations in support of the theater campaign plan and potential contingencies that may arise in or affect the United States Central Command area of responsibility, including any potential efficiencies and risk mitigation measures to be taken. (E) A description of methods to mitigate risk that may result from adjustments to United States military force posture and capabilities deployed in the United States Central Command area of responsibility. (F) An explanation of the manner in which a modernized global operating model or dynamic force employment approach may yield efficiencies and increase strategic flexibility while achieving United States military objectives in the United States Central Command area of responsibility. (G) An articulation of the United States nonmilitary efforts and activities necessary to enable the achievement of United States national security interests in the United States Central Command area of responsibility. (H) Any other matter the Secretary considers relevant. (b) Report (1) In general Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the review conducted under subsection (a). (2) Form The report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (c) Posture review period defined In this section, the term posture review period 1288. Reports on expenses incurred for in-flight refueling of Saudi coalition aircraft conducting missions relating to civil war in Yemen (a) Reports required (1) In general Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 30 days thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report to the appropriate committees of Congress detailing the expenses incurred by the United States in providing in-flight refueling services for Saudi or Saudi-led coalition non-United States aircraft conducting missions as part of the civil war in Yemen during the period of March 1, 2015, through November 11, 2018, and the extent to which such expenses have been reimbursed by members of the Saudi-led coalition. (2) Elements Each report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) The total expenses incurred by the United States in providing in-flight refueling services, including fuel, flight hours, and other applicable expenses, to Saudi or Saudi-led coalition, non-United States aircraft conducting missions as part of the civil war in Yemen. (B) The amount of the expenses described in subparagraph (A) that has been reimbursed by each member of the Saudi-led coalition. (C) Any action taken by the United States to recoup the remaining expenses described in subparagraph (A), including any commitments by members of the Saudi-led coalition to reimburse the United States for such expenses. (3) Sunset The reporting requirement under paragraph (1) shall cease to be effective on the date on which the Secretary certifies to the appropriate committees of Congress that all expenses incurred by the United States in providing in-flight refueling services for Saudi or Saudi-led coalition non-United States aircraft conducting missions as part of the civil war in Yemen during the period of March 1, 2015, through November 11, 2018, have been reimbursed. (b) Appropriate committees of Congress defined In this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress (1) the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; (2) the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; (3) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (4) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1289. Sense of Senate on security concerns with respect to leasing arrangements for the Port of Haifa in Israel It is the sense of the Senate that the United States— (1) has an interest in the future forward presence of United States naval vessels at the Port of Haifa in Israel but has serious security concerns with respect to the leasing arrangements of the Port of Haifa as of the date of the enactment of this Act; and (2) should urge the Government of Israel to consider the security implications of foreign investment in Israel. XIII COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 1301. Funding allocations for Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program (a) In general Of the $338,700,000 authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 in section 301 and made available by the funding table in division D for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program established under section 1321 of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Act ( 50 U.S.C. 3711 (1) For strategic offensive arms elimination, $492,000. (2) For chemical weapons destruction, $12,856,000. (3) For global nuclear security, $33,919,000. (4) For biological threat reduction, $183,642,000. (5) For proliferation prevention, $79,869,000. (6) For activities designated as Other Assessments/Administrative Costs, $27,922,000. (b) Availability of funds Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in division D for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program shall be available for obligation for fiscal years 2020, 2021, and 2022. XIV Other Authorizations A Military Programs 1401. Working capital funds Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 1402. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. (b) Use Amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) are authorized for— (1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 ( 50 U.S.C. 1521 (2) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such Act. 1403. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 1404. Defense Inspector General Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 1405. Defense Health Program Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section 4501, for use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense in providing for the health of eligible beneficiaries. B National Defense Stockpile 1411. Modification of prohibition on acquisition of sensitive materials from non-allied foreign nations (a) Expansion of materials covered by prohibition on sale from National Defense Stockpile Subsection (a)(2) of section 2533c of title 10, United States Code, is amended, in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking covered material material (b) Inclusion of tantalum in definition of covered materials Subsection (d)(1) of such section is amended— (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ; and (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period and inserting ; and (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (E) tantalum. . C Armed Forces Retirement Home 1421. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund the sum of $64,300,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces Retirement Home. 1422. Expansion of eligibility for residence at the Armed Forces Retirement Home (a) Expansion of eligibility to certain members with non-regular service Section 1512(a) of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 ( 24 U.S.C. 412(a) (1) in the first sentence, by striking active (2) in paragraph (1), by striking are 60 years of age or over and (3) by adding the following new paragraph: (5) Persons who are eligible for retired pay under chapter 1223 (A) are eligible for care under section 1710 of title 38, United States Code; (B) are enrolled in coverage under chapter 55 (C) are enrolled in a qualified health plan acceptable to the Chief Operating Officer. . (b) Parity of monthly fees Paragraph (2) of section 1514(c) of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 ( 24 U.S.C. 414(c) (2) (A) The fee shall be fixed as a percentage of the monthly income and monthly payments (including Federal payments) received by a resident. The percentage shall be the same for each facility of the Retirement Home. The Secretary of Defense may make any adjustment in the percentage that the Secretary determines appropriate. (B) The amount of the monthly income and monthly payments calculated under subparagraph (A) for a resident accepted under section 1512(a)(5) may not be less than the current monthly retirement pay for equivalent active duty service as determined by the Chief Operating Officer, except as the Chief Operating Officer may otherwise provide due to compelling personal circumstances of the resident. . (c) Pay deductions Section 1007(i) of title 37, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) by inserting or compensation, as applicable, pay (B) by striking on active duty (2) in paragraph (3), by striking Board Chief Operating Officer (3) by striking paragraph (4). (d) Admission fees for residents based on non-regular service Section 1514 of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991, as amended by subsection (b), is further amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (c) and (d), respectively; (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): (b) Admission fees for certain residents The Administrator of each facility of the Retirement Home may also collect a fee upon admission from a resident accepted under section 412(a)(5) equal to the deductions then in effect under section 1007(i)(1) of title 37, United States Code, for each year of non-regular service of the resident before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020. ; and (3) in subsection (c), as redesignated by paragraph (1), by striking subsection (a) subsections (a) and (b) D Other Matters 1431. Authority for transfer of funds to joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois (a) Authority for transfer of funds Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 1405 and available for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance, $127,000,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 ( Public Law 111–84 (b) Use of transferred funds For the purposes of subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement covered by section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 ( Public Law 110–417 XV Authorization of additional appropriations for overseas contingency operations A Authorization of additional appropriations 1501. Purpose The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize appropriations for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 to provide additional funds for overseas contingency operations being carried out by the Armed Forces. 1502. Overseas contingency operations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the Department of Defense for overseas contingency operations in such amounts as may be designated as provided in section 251(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 ( 2 U.S.C. 901(b)(2)(A)(ii) 1503. Procurement Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4102. 1504. Research, development, test, and evaluation Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in the funding table in section 4202. 1505. Operation and maintenance Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4302. 1506. Military personnel Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4402. 1507. Working capital funds Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 1508. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 1509. Defense Inspector General Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 1510. Defense Health Program Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. B Financial matters 1521. Treatment as additional authorizations The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated by this Act. 1522. Special transfer authority (a) Authority To transfer authorizations (1) Authority Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal year 2020 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred. (2) Limitation The total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this subsection may not exceed $2,500,000,000. (b) Terms and conditions Transfers under this section shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as transfers under section 1001. (c) Additional authority The transfer authority provided by this section is in addition to the transfer authority provided under section 1001. XVI Strategic programs, cyber, and intelligence matters A Space Activities I United States Space Force 1601. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space Policy Section 138(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (5) One of the Assistant Secretaries is the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space Policy. The principal duty of the Assistant Secretary shall be the overall supervision of policy of the Department of Defense for space warfighting. . 1602. Principal Assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force for Space Acquisition and Integration (a) Redesignation of Principal Assistant for Space as Principal Assistant for Space Acquisition and Integration (1) In general The Principal Assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force for Space is hereby redesignated as the Principal Assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force for Space Acquisition and Integration. (2) References Any reference to the Principal Assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force for Space in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be deemed to be a reference to the Principal Assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force for Space Acquisition and Integration. (b) Codification of position and responsibilities (1) In general Chapter 903 (A) by redesignating section 9018 as section 9018a; and (B) by inserting after section 9017 the following new section 9018: 9018. Principal Assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force for Space Acquisition and Integration (a) (1) There is within the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force a Principal Assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force for Space Acquisition and Integration, who shall be appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. (2) The individual serving as Principal Assistant shall have the protocol equivalent in the Department of Defense of an officer in the armed forces serving in a general or admiral grade. (b) Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of the Air Force, the Principal Assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force for Space Acquisition and Integration shall do as follows: (1) Be responsible for all acquisition and integration of the Air Force for space systems and programs, including in support of the Commander of the United States Space Force under section 9064 of this title. (2) Serve as the senior acquisition executive under section 1704 of this title for the Air Force for acquisition for space systems and programs, including for all major defense acquisition programs under chapter 144 of this title for space. (3) Oversee and direct each of the following: (A) The Space Rapid Capabilities Office under section 2273a of this title. (B) The Space and Missile Systems Center. (C) The Space Development Agency. (4) Oversee and direct acquisition projects for all space systems and programs of the Air Force, including projects for space systems and programs transferred to the Principal Assistant pursuant to section 1602(b)(4) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020. (5) Act as the chair of the Space Force Acquisition Council under section 1602(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020. (c) In addition to the responsibilities provided for in subsection (b), the Principal Assistant shall have such other responsibilities and perform such other duties as the Secretary may prescribe. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 903 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 9018 and inserting the following new items: 9018. Principal Assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force for Space Acquisition and Integration. 9018a. Administrative Assistant. . (3) Executive Schedule Level V Section 5416 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item: Principal Assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force for Space Acquisition and Integration. . (4) Transfer of acquisition projects for space systems and programs The Secretary of the Air Force shall transfer to the Principal Assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force for Space Acquisition and Integration under section 9018 of title 10, United States Code (as added by this subsection), responsibility for oversight, direction, and integration of any acquisition projects for space systems and programs of the Air Force that are under the oversight or direction of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition as of the date of the enactment of this Act. (c) Space Force Acquisition Council (1) In general There is in the Department of the Air Force a council to be known as the Space Force Acquisition Council Council (2) Membership The members of the Council are as follows: (A) The Under Secretary of the Air Force. (B) The Principal Assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force for Space Acquisition and Integration, who shall act as chair of the Council. (C) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space Policy. (D) The Director of the National Reconnaissance Office. (E) The Commander of the United States Space Command. (F) The Commander of the United States Space Force. (3) Functions The Council shall oversee, direct, and manage acquisition and integration of the Air Force for space systems and programs in order to ensure integration across the national security space enterprise. (4) Meetings The Council shall meet not less frequently than monthly. (5) Reports Not later than 30 days after the end of each calendar year quarter through the first calendar year quarter of 2025, the Council shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the activities of the Council during the calendar year quarter preceding the calendar year quarter in which such report is submitted. (d) Briefings On or about March 31, 2020, and during every calendar year quarter thereafter through March 31, 2022, the Secretary of the Air Force shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the current status of efforts to implement this section and the amendments made by this section. Each briefing may include such recommendations for legislative and administrative action as the Secretary considers appropriate to facilitate and enhance such efforts. 1603. Military space forces within the Air Force (a) In general Section 9062(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking the first sentence and inserting the following: (1) The Air Force includes the following: (A) Aviation forces both combat and service not otherwise assigned. (B) Space forces. ; and (2) by striking It shall be organized (2) The Air Force shall be organized . (b) Territorial organizations (1) In general Subsection (b) of section 9074 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting , including space, other places (2) Heading amendment The heading of such section is amended to read as follows: 9074. Commands: territorial and other organization . (3) Table of sections amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 907 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 9074 and inserting the following new item: 9074. Commands: territorial and other organization. . 1604. Redesignation of Air Force Space Command as United States Space Force (a) Redesignation The Air Force Space Command is hereby redesignated as the United States Space Force (USSF). (b) Commander and authorities (1) In general Section 2279c of title 10, United States Code, is— (A) transferred to chapter 907 of such title; (B) inserted after section 9062; and (C) as so transferred and inserted, amended to read as follows: 9063. United States Space Force (a) United States Space Force There is in the Air Force the United States Space Force. (b) Commander (1) The head of the United States Space Force shall be the Commander of the United States Space Force, who shall be appointed in accordance with section 601 of this title. The officer serving as Commander, while so serving, has the grade of general or admiral without vacating the permanent grade of the officer. (2) The Commander shall be appointed to serve a term of four years. (c) Temporary concurrent service as Commander of USSF and Commander of United States Space Command During the one-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, the Secretary of Defense may authorize an officer serving as the Commander of the United States Space Force to serve concurrently as the Commander of the United States Space Command under section 169 of this title, without further appointment as otherwise provided for in subsection (c) of such section. (d) Vice commander The deputy head of the United States Space Force shall be the Vice Commander of the United States Space Force, who shall be appointed in accordance with section 601 of this title. The officer serving as Vice Commander, while so serving, has the grade of general or admiral without vacating the permanent grade of the officer. (e) Duties (1) Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of the Air Force, the Commander of the United States Space Force shall do the following: (A) Exercise authority, direction, and control of all space operations-peculiar administrative matters relating to the organization, training, and equipping of the space forces of the Air Force. (B) Exercise the authorities and responsibilities assigned to the Commander as Commander of the Air Force Space Command before December 12, 2017. (C) Carry out such other duties as the Secretary may specify. (2) In carrying out duties under paragraph (1), the Commander of the United States Space Force shall report as follows: (A) During the one-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, to the Secretary of the Air Force through the Chief of Staff of the Air Force. (B) After the period described in subparagraph (A), directly to the Secretary of the Air Force. (3) (A) During the one-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2020, upon the request of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Commander of the United States Space Force may participate in any meeting of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in consideration by the Joint Chiefs of Staff of an issue in connection with a duty or responsibility of the Commander. (B) Commencing as of the end of the period described in subparagraph (A), the Commander of the United States Space Force shall be a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (f) Elements (1) In addition to the elements of the Air Force Space Command as of the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, the United States Space Force shall include other military and civilian personnel of the Air Force (including appropriate elements of the Air National Guard and the Air Force Reserve), and other infrastructure, assets, and resources of the Air Force, assigned to the Space Force by the Secretary of the Air Force. (2) The Secretary shall provide for the Space Force a cadre of military and civilian personnel within the Air Force who shall assist the Space Force in establishing and maintaining an ethos and culture for space warfighting. . (2) Service of incumbent Commander of Air Force Space Command as Commander of United States Space Force The individual serving as Commander of the Air Force Space Command as of the date of the enactment of this Act may serve as the Commander of the United States Space Force under subsection (b) of section 9063 of title 10, United States Code (as added by paragraph (1)), after that date without further appointment as otherwise provided for by that subsection. (3) Secretary of Defense report on concurrency of command (A) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth an assessment of the advisability of permitting the Commander of the United States Space Force to serve concurrently as Commander of the United States Space Command as authorized by subsection (c) of section 9063 of title 10, United States Code (as so added). (B) Comptroller General briefing Not later than 30 days after the submittal of the report required by subparagraph (A), the Comptroller General of the United States shall provide the congressional defense committees a briefing on the assessment of the Comptroller General of the matters contained in the report. (4) Secretary of the Air Force briefings on USSF On or about March 31, 2020, and during every calendar year quarter thereafter through March 31, 2022, the Secretary of the Air Force shall provide the congressional defense committees a briefing on the following: (A) The current status of the missions and manpower of the United States Space Force under section 9063 of title 10, United States Code (as so added), including the current status of the assumption by the United States Space Force of the elements to constitute the United States Space Force, including the elements of the Air Force Space Command and the elements assigned pursuant to subsection (f)(1) of such section. (B) The current status of activities of the cadre of personnel required by subsection (f)(2) of such section 9063 (as so added), including an assessment of the progress of the cadre in establishing and maintaining the ethos and culture described in that subsection. (5) No authorization of additional military billets or civilian personnel The Secretary of the Air Force shall carry out this subsection and the amendments made by this subsection within military and civilian personnel of the Air Force otherwise authorized by this Act. Nothing in this subsection or the amendments made by this subsection shall be construed to authorize additional military billets or the employment of additional civilian personnel for the purposes of, or in connection with, the establishment of the United States Space Force. (c) Conforming amendment to US Space Command commander authority Section 169(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraph (2): (2) If authorized by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to section 9063(c) of this title, the officer serving as Commander of the United States Space Force also serves concurrently as Commander of the United States Space Command, but only during the one-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020. . (d) Joint Chiefs of Staff matters Effective on the date that is one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, section 151(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (8) The Commander of the United States Space Force. . (e) Clerical amendments (1) Chapter 135 The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 135 (2) Chapter 907 The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 907 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 9062 the following new item: 9063. United States Space Force. . (f) References Any reference to the Air Force Space Command in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be deemed to be a reference to the United States Space Force. 1605. Assignment of personnel to the National Reconnaissance Office for mission needs (a) USSF as primary source of personnel Effective as of the date of the enactment of this Act, military and civilian personnel of the United States Space Force under section 9063 of title 10, United States Code (as added by section 1604(b) of this Act), shall be the primary source of military and civilian personnel of the Department of the Air Force who may be assigned to the National Reconnaissance Office. (b) Assignment by Commander, USSF Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of the Air Force, the Commander of the United States Space Force shall be responsible for the assignment of military and civilian personnel of the United States Space Force to the National Reconnaissance Office. 1606. Report on establishment of position of Under Secretary of the Air Force for Space (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the advisability of establishing within the Department of the Air Force a position of Under Secretary of the Air Force for Space with the responsibility of providing civilian oversight to the United States Space Force (as provided for by section 1604 of this Act). (b) Considerations In preparing the report required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall take into consideration the tasks and operations of the staff of the Air Force in support of the space warfighting mission of the Air Force and such other matters as the Secretary considers appropriate. 1607. Report on enhanced integration of capabilities of the National Security Agency, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, and the United States Space Command for joint operations Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence, submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the results of a review, conducted for purposes of the report, on processes designed to achieve more effective integration of capabilities among the National Security Agency, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, and the United States Space Command for joint operations in a manner that does not result in the impairment of the authorities or responsibilities of the Director. 1608. Limitation on availability of funds None of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 by this Act and available for the Air Force for programs, projects, or activities for space, including acquisition programs, projects, or activities, may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force completes briefings of the congressional defense committees on the plans of the Air Force to implement this part and the amendments made by this part, including the following: (1) The establishment of the office of the Principal Assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force for Space Acquisition and Integration under section 9018 of title 10, United States Code (as added by section 1602 of this Act). (2) The establishment of the United States Space Force required by section 9063 of title 10, United States Code (as added by section 1604 of this Act). II Other space matters 1611. Repeal of requirement to establish Space Command as a subordinate unified command of the United States Strategic Command (a) In general Section 169 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed. (b) Technical and conforming amendment The table of sections for chapter 6 1612. Program to enhance and improve launch support and infrastructure (a) In general In support of the policy described in section 2273(a) of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense may carry out a program to enhance infrastructure and improve support activities for the processing and launch of Department of Defense small-class and medium-class payloads. (b) Program The program under subsection (a) shall include improvements to operations at launch ranges and Federal Aviation Administration-licensed spaceports that are consistent with, and necessary to permit, the use of such launch ranges and spaceports by the Department. (c) Consultation In carrying out the program under subsection (a), the Secretary may consult with current and anticipated users of launch ranges and Federal Aviation Administration-licensed spaceports, including the Space Rapid Capabilities Office. (d) Cooperation In carrying out the program under subsection (a), the Secretary may enter into a contract or agreement under section 2276 of title 10, United States Code. (e) Report Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing a plan for the program under subsection (a). 1613. Modification of enhancement of positioning, navigation, and timing capacity (a) Capability for trusted signals (1) Subsection heading Subsection (a) of section 1609 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 trusted signals alternative Global Navigation Satellite System signals (2) Requirement Paragraph (1) of such subsection is amended to read as follows: (1) Requirement The Secretary of the Air Force shall ensure that military Global Positioning System (GPS) user equipment terminals have the capability, as appropriate to user needs and constraints, to incorporate signals from the Galileo satellites of the European Union and the QZSS satellites of Japan, beginning with the implementation of open-system architecture solutions, such as the Resilient-Embedded GPS/Inertial Navigation System (R-EGI), to accompany other alternative and complementary navigation sources for robust positioning, navigation, and timing. . (3) Waiver Paragraph (2) of such subsection is amended— (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking could not integrate such capability beginning with increment 2 of the acquisition of such terminals should not integrate such capability into the Resilient-Embedded GPS/Inertial Navigation System architecture (B) in subparagraph (B), by inserting that considers the addition of multi-Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals to provide substantive military utility such terminals (b) Capability for other signals Subsection (b) of such section is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1)— (1) by inserting other allied and non-allied positioning, navigation, and timing signals (2) by striking increment 2 of the acquisition of such terminals the Resilient-Embedded GPS/Inertial Navigation System architecture 1614. Modification of term of Commander of Air Force Space Command Section 2279c(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended, in the first sentence, by striking six years four years 1615. Annual report on Space Command and Control program (a) In general For each of fiscal years 2021 through 2025, concurrent with the submittal to Congress of the budget of the Department of Defense with the budget of the President for the subsequent fiscal year under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, the congressional defense committees, and the Comptroller General of the United States, an annual report on the Space Command and Control program. (b) Matters to be included Each report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A description of any modification to the metrics established by the Secretary in the acquisition strategy for the program. (2) The short-term objectives for the subsequent fiscal year. (3) For the preceding fiscal year, a description of— (A) the ongoing, achieved, and deferred objectives; (B) the challenges encountered and the lessons learned; (C) the modifications made or planned so as to incorporate such lessons learned into subsequent efforts to address challenges; and (D) the cost, schedule, and performance effects of such modifications. (c) Review of reports and briefing by Comptroller General With respect to each report submitted under this section, the Comptroller General shall review and provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on a date mutually agreed on by the Comptroller General and the congressional defense committees. 1616. Requirements for phase 2 of acquisition strategy for National Security Space Launch program In carrying out phase 2 of the acquisition strategy for the national security space launch program, the Secretary of the Air Force— (1) may not— (A) modify the acquisition schedule or mission performance requirements; or (B) award missions to more than two launch service providers; and (2) shall ensure that launch services are procured only from launch service providers that use launch vehicles meeting each Government requirement with respect to required payloads to reference orbits. B Defense intelligence and intelligence-related activities 1621. Redesignation of Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence as Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security (a) Redesignation of Under Secretary (1) In general The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence is hereby redesignated as the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security. (2) Service of incumbent in position The individual serving as Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence as of the date of the enactment of this Act may serve as Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security commencing as of that date without further appointment under section 137 of title 10, United States Code (as amended by subsection (c)(1)(A)(ii)). (3) Reference Any reference in any law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence shall be deemed to be a reference to the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security. (b) Redesignation of related Deputy Under Secretary (1) In general The Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence is hereby redesignated as the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security. (2) Service of incumbent in position The individual serving as Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence as of the date of the enactment of this Act may serve as Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security commencing as of that date without further appointment under section 137a of title 10, United States Code (as amended by subsection (c)(1)(B)). (3) Reference Any reference in any law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence shall be deemed to be a reference to the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security. (c) Conforming amendments (1) Title 10 Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows: (A) In each provision as follows, by striking Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security (i) Section 131(b)(3)(F). (ii) Section 137, each place it appears. (iii) Section 139a(d)(6). (iv) Section 139b(c)(2)(E). (v) Section 181(d)(1)(B). (vi) Section 393(b)(2)(C). (vii) Section 426, each place it appears. (viii) Section 430(a). (B) In section 137a(c)(6), by striking Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security (C) The heading of section 137 is amended to read as follows: 137. Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security . (D) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 4 is amended by striking the item relating to section 137 and inserting the following new item: 137. Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security. . (2) Title 5 Title 5, United States Code, is amended as follows: (A) In section 5314, by striking Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security (B) In section 5315, by striking Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security 1622. Repeal of certain requirements relating to integration of Department of Defense intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities (a) Repeal Section 426 of title 10, United States Code, is hereby repealed. (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 21 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 426. 1623. Improving the onboarding methodology for certain intelligence personnel (a) In general The Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall, consistent with Department of Defense Instruction 1400.25, as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act— (1) not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that outlines a common methodology for measuring onboarding in covered elements of the intelligence community, including human resources and security processes; (2) not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, issue metrics for assessing key phases in the onboarding described in paragraph (1) for which results will be reported by the date that is 90 days after the date of such issuance; (3) not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on collaboration among covered elements of the intelligence community on their onboarding processes; (4) not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on employment of automated mechanisms in covered elements of the intelligence community, including for tracking personnel as they pass through each phase of the onboarding process; and (5) not later than December 31, 2020, distribute surveys to human resources offices and applicants about their experiences with the onboarding process in covered elements of the intelligence community. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) The term appropriate committees of Congress (A) the Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; and (B) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. (2) The term covered elements of the intelligence community (A) The Department of Energy. (B) The Department of Homeland Security. (C) The Department of Justice. (D) The Department of State. (E) The Department of the Treasury. 1624. Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency activities on facilitating access to local criminal records historical data (a) Activity authorized The Director of the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency may carry out a set of activities relating to facilitating access by the Agency to local criminal records historical data. (b) Activities characterized The activities carried out under subsection (a) shall include only the following: (1) Training and education. (2) Outreach to State, local, and tribal authorities. (3) Direct assistance. (c) Reports (1) Initial report Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that details a concept of operation for the set of activities authorized by subsection (a). (2) Annual reports Not later than one year after the date on which the Director submits a report pursuant to paragraph (1) and not less frequently than once each year thereafter, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a detailed report on the activities carried out by the Director under this section. C Cyberspace-related matters 1631. Reorientation of Big Data Platform program (a) Reorientation of program (1) In general Not later than January 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall— (A) reorient the Big Data Platform program as specified in this section; and (B) align the reorientation effort under an existing line of effort of the Cyber Strategy of the Department of Defense. (2) Oversight of implementation The Secretary shall act through the Principal Cyber Advisor and the supporting Cross Functional Team in the oversight of the implementation of paragraph (1). (b) Common baseline and security classification scheme (1) In general Not later than January 1, 2021, the Secretary shall establish a common baseline and security classification scheme for the collection, storage, processing, querying, analysis, and accessibility of a common and comprehensive set of metadata from sensors, applications, appliances, products, and systems deployed across the Department of Defense Information Network (DODIN) to enable the discovery, tracking, and remediation of cybersecurity threats. (2) Requirements In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary shall— (A) take such actions as the Secretary considers necessary to standardize deployed infrastructure, including the Department of Defense’s perimeter capabilities at the Internet Access Points and the Joint Regional Security Stacks, and the routing of data laterally and vertically from Department of Defense Information Network segments and tiers, to enable standard and comprehensive metadata collection; (B) take such actions as the Secretary considers necessary to standardize deployed cybersecurity applications, products, and sensors and the routing of data laterally and vertically from Department of Defense Information Network segments and tiers, to enable standard and comprehensive metadata collection; (C) develop an enterprise-wide architecture and strategy for— (i) where to place sensors or extract data from network information technology, operational technology, and cybersecurity appliances, applications, products, and systems for cybersecurity purposes; (ii) which metadata data records should be universally sent to Big Data Platform instances and which metadata data records, if any, should be locally retained; and (iii) expeditiously and efficiently transmitting metadata records to the Big Data Platform instances, including the acquisition and installation of further data bandwidth; (D) determine the appropriate number, organization, and functions of separate Big Data Platform instances, and whether the Big Data Platform instances that are currently managed by Department of Defense components, including the military services, should instead be jointly and regionally organized; (E) determine the appropriate roles of the Defense Information Systems Agency’s Acropolis and United States Cyber Command’s Scarif Big Data Platforms as enterprise-wide real-time cybersecurity situational awareness capabilities, as complements or replacements for component-level Big Data Platform instances; (F) ensure that all Big Data Platform instances are engineered and approved to enable standard access and query capabilities by the Unified Platform, the network defense service providers, and the Cyber Mission Forces, with centrally managed authentication and authorization services; (G) prohibit barriers to information sharing, distributed query, data analysis, and collaboration across Big Data Platform instances, such as incompatible interfaces, interconnection service agreements, and the imposition of accreditation boundaries; (H) transition all Big Data Platform instances to a cloud computing environment in alignment with the cloud strategy of the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense; (I) consider whether packet capture databases should continue to be maintained separately from the Big Data Platform instances, managed at the secret level of classification, and treated as malware-infected when the packet data are copies of packets extant in the Department of Defense Information Network; (J) in the case that the Secretary decides to sustain the status quo on packet capture databases, ensure that analysts operating on or from the Unified Platform, the Big Data Platform instances, the network defense services providers, and the Cyber Mission Force units can directly access packets and query the database; and (K) consider whether the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center’s cybersecurity artificial intelligence national mission initiative should include an application for the metadata residing in the Big Data Platform instances. (c) Limit on data and data indexing schema The Secretary shall ensure that the Unified Platform program utilizes the data and the data indexing schema that is native to the Big Data Platform rather than creating a duplicate index or data tagger. (d) Analytics and application sourcing and collaboration The Secretary shall ensure that the Services and office of the Big Data Platform program— (1) seek advanced analytics and applications from Government and commercial sources that can be executed on the deployed Big Data Platform architecture; and (2) collaborate with vendors offering commercial analytics and applications, including support to refactoring commercial capabilities to the Government platform where industry can still own the intellectual property embedded in the analytics and applications. (e) Briefing required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and not less frequently than once every 180 days thereafter until the activities required by subsection (a)(1) are completed, the Secretary shall provide the congressional defense committees a briefing on the activities of the Secretary in carrying out subsection (b). 1632. Zero-based review of Department of Defense cyber and information technology personnel (a) Review required Not later than January 1, 2021, each head of a covered department, component, or agency shall— (1) complete a zero-based review of the cyber and information technology personnel of the head's covered department, component, or agency; and (2) provide the Principal Cyber Advisor, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, and the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness the findings of the head with respect to the head's covered department, component, or agency. (b) Covered departments, components, and agencies For purposes of this section, a covered department, component, or agency is— (1) an independent Department of Defense component or agency; (2) the Office of the Secretary of Defense; (3) a component of the Joint Staff; (4) a military department or an armed force; or (5) a reserve component of the Armed Forces. (c) Scope of review As part of a review conducted pursuant to subsection (a)(1), the head of a covered department, component, or agency shall, with respect to the covered department, component, or agency of the head— (1) assess military, civilian, and contractor positions and personnel performing cyber and information technology missions; (2) determine the roles and functions assigned by reviewing existing position descriptions and conducting interviews to quantify the current workload performed by military, civilian, and contractor workforce; (3) compare the Department’s manning with the manning of comparable industry organizations; (4) include evaluation of the utility of cyber- and information technology-focused missions, positions, and personnel within such components— (A) to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of current activities; (B) to assess the necessity of increasing, reducing, or eliminating resources; and (C) to guide prioritization of investment and funding; (5) develop recommendations and objectives for organizational, manning, and equipping change, taking into account anticipated developments in information technologies, workload projections, automation and process enhancements, and Department requirements; (6) develop a gap analysis, contrasting the current organization and the objectives developed pursuant to paragraph (5); and (7) develop roadmaps of prioritized activities and a timeline for implementing the activities to close the gaps identified pursuant to paragraph (6). (d) Elements In carrying out a review pursuant to subsection (a)(1), the head of a covered department, component, or agency shall consider the following: (1) Whether position descriptions and coding designators for given cybersecurity and information technology roles are accurate indicators of the work being performed. (2) Whether the function of any cybersecurity or information technology position or personnel can be replaced by acquisition of cybersecurity or information technology products or automation. (3) Whether a given component or subcomponent is over- or under-resourced in terms of personnel, using industry standards as a benchmark where applicable. (4) Whether cybersecurity service provider positions and personnel fit coherently into the enterprise-wide cybersecurity architecture and with the Department’s cyber protection teams. (5) Whether the function of any cybersecurity or information technology position or personnel could be conducted more efficiently or effectively by enterprise-level cyber or information technology personnel. (e) Furnishing data and analysis (1) Data and analysis In carrying out subsection (a)(2), each head of a covered department, component, or agency, shall furnish to the Principal Cyber Advisor, the Chief Information Officer, and the Under Secretary a description of the analysis that led to the findings submitted under such subsection and the data used in such analysis. (2) Certification The Principal Cyber Advisor, the Chief Information Officer, and the Under Secretary of Defense shall jointly review each submittal under subsection (a)(2) and certify whether the findings and analysis are in compliance with the requirements of this section. (f) Recommendations After receiving findings submitted by a head of a covered department, component, or agency pursuant to paragraph (2) of subsection (a) with respect to a review conducted by the head pursuant to paragraph (1) of such subsection, the Principal Cyber Advisor, the Chief Information Officer, and the Under Secretary shall jointly provide to such head such recommendations as the Principal Cyber Advisor, the Chief Information Officer, and the Under Secretary may have for changes in manning or acquisition that proceed from such review. (g) Implementation The Principal Cyber Advisor, the Chief Information Officer, and the Under Secretary shall jointly oversee and assist in the implementation of the roadmaps developed pursuant to subsection (c)(7) and the recommendations developed pursuant to subsection (f). (h) In-progress reviews Not later than six months after the date of the enactment of this Act and not less frequently than once every six months thereafter until the Principal Cyber Advisor, the Chief Information Officer, and the Under Secretary give the briefing required by subsection (i), the Principal Cyber Advisor, the Chief Information Officer, and the Under Secretary shall jointly— (1) conduct in-progress reviews of the status of the reviews required by subsection (a)(1); and (2) provide the congressional defense committees with a briefing on such in-progress reviews. (i) Final briefing After all of the reviews have been completed under paragraph (1) of subsection (a), after receiving all of the findings pursuant to paragraph (2) of such subsection, and not later than June 1, 2021, the Principal Cyber Advisor, the Chief Information Officer, and the Under Secretary shall jointly provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the findings of the Principal Cyber Advisor, the Chief Information Officer, and the Under Secretary with respect to such reviews, including such recommendations as the Principal Cyber Advisor, the Chief Information Officer, and the Under Secretary may have for changes to the budget of the Department as a result of such reviews. (j) Definition of zero-based review In this section, the term zero-based review 1633. Study on improving cyber career paths in the Navy (a) Study required Not later than October 1, 2020, the Secretary of the Navy and the Chief of Naval Operations shall jointly— (1) complete a study on methods to improve military and civilian cyber career paths within the Navy; and (2) submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the findings of the Secretary and Chief with respect to the study completed pursuant to paragraph (1) and submit such report with all of the data used in such study. (b) Elements The report submitted pursuant to subsection (a)(2) shall include the following: (1) A plan for implementing career paths for civilian and military personnel tailored to develop expertise in cyber skill sets, including skills sets appropriate for offensive and defensive military cyber operations. (2) Suggested changes to the processes that govern the identification of talent and career progression of the civilian and military workforce. (3) A methodology for a cyber workforce assignment policy that deliberately builds depth and breadth of knowledge regarding the conduct of cyber operations throughout an entire career. (4) Possible enhancements to identifying, recruiting, training, and retaining the cyber workforce, both civilian and military, especially for Interactive On-Net operators and tool developers. (5) Recommendations for legislative and administrative actions to address the findings and recommendations of the Secretary and the Chief with respect to the study completed pursuant to subsection (a)(1). (c) Consultation In conducting the study required by subsection (a)(1), the Secretary and the Chief shall consult with the following: (1) The Principal Cyber Advisor of the Department of Defense. (2) The Secretary of the Air Force. (3) The Air Force Chief of Staff. (4) The Secretary of the Army. (5) The Army Chief of Staff. (6) The Commandant of the Marine Corps. (7) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness. (8) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense. (9) The Commander of the United States Cyber Command. 1634. Framework to enhance cybersecurity of the United States defense industrial base (a) Framework required Not later than February 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a consistent, comprehensive framework to enhance cybersecurity for the United States defense industrial base. (b) Elements The framework developed pursuant to subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) Identification of unified cybersecurity standards, regulations, metrics, ratings, third-party certifications, or requirements to be imposed on the defense industrial base for the purpose of assessing the cybersecurity of individual contractors. (2) The roles and responsibilities of various activities within the Department of Defense, across the entire acquisition process, beginning with market research, including responsibility determination, solicitation, and award, and continuing with contractor management and oversight on matters relating to cybersecurity. (3) The responsibilities of the prime contractors, and all subcontractors in the supply chain, for implementing the required cybersecurity standards, regulations, metrics, ratings, third-party certifications, and requirements identified under paragraph (1). (4) A plan to provide implementation guidance, education, manuals, and, as necessary, direct technical support or assistance to such contractors on matters relating to cybersecurity. (5) Methods and programs for defining and managing controlled unclassified information, and for limiting the presence of unnecessary sensitive information on contractor networks. (6) Quantitative metrics for assessing the effectiveness of the overall framework over time, with respect to the exfiltration of controlled unclassified information from the defense industrial base. (c) Matters for consideration In developing the framework required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider the following: (1) Designating an official to be responsible for the cybersecurity of the defense industrial base. (2) Evaluating methods, standards, metrics, and third-party certifications for assessing the cybersecurity of individual contractors. (3) Ensuring a consistent approach across the Department to matters relating to the cybersecurity of the defense industrial base. (4) Tailoring cybersecurity requirements for small- and medium-sized contractors based on a risk-based approach. (5) Ensuring the Department’s traceability and visibility of cybersecurity compliance of suppliers to all levels of the supply chain. (6) Evaluating incentives and penalties for cybersecurity performance of suppliers. (7) Integrating cybersecurity and traditional counterintelligence measures, requirements, and programs. (8) Establishing a secure software development environment (DevSecOps) in a cloud environment inside the perimeter of the Department for contractors to do their development work. (9) Establishing a secure cloud environment where contractors could access the data of the Department needed for their contract work. (10) Establishing a Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification for defense industrial base companies, scoring companies on a rating scale, and requiring certain ratings for contract awards. (11) Providing additional assistance to small companies in the form of training, mentoring, approved security product lists, and approved lists of security-as-a-service providers. (12) Technological means, operational concepts, reference architectures, offensive counterintelligence operation concepts, and plans for operationalization to complicate adversary espionage, including honeypotting and data obfuscation. (13) Implementing enhanced security vulnerability assessments for contractors working on critical acquisition programs, technologies, manufacturing capabilities, and research areas. (14) Identifying ways to better leverage technology and employ machine learning or artificial intelligence capabilities, such as Internet Protocol monitoring and data integrity capabilities to be applied to contractor information systems that host, receive, or transmit controlled unclassified information. (15) Developing tools to easily segregate program data to only allow subcontractors access to their specific information. (16) Appropriate communications of threat assessments of the defense industrial base to the acquisition workforce at all classification levels. (17) Appropriate communications with industry on the impact of cybersecurity considerations in contracting and procurement decisions. (d) Consultation In developing the framework required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with the following: (1) Industry groups representing the defense industrial base. (2) Contractors in the defense industrial base. (3) The Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. (4) The Secretary of Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (5) The Director of National Intelligence. (e) Briefing (1) In general Not later than March 11, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall provide the congressional defense committees with a briefing on the framework developed pursuant to subsection (a). (2) Contents The briefing required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An overview of the framework developed in subsection (a). (B) Identification of such pilot programs as the Secretary considers may be required to improve the cybersecurity of the defense industrial base. (C) Implementation timelines and identification of costs. (D) Such recommendations as the Secretary may have for legislative action to improve the cybersecurity of the defense industrial base. (f) Quarterly briefings (1) In general Not less frequently than once each quarter until February 1, 2022, the Secretary of Defense shall brief the congressional defense committees on the status of development and implementation of the framework required by subsection (a). (2) Coordination with other briefings Each briefing under paragraph (1) shall be conducted in conjunction with a quarterly briefing under section 484(a) of title 10, United States Code. (3) Elements Each briefing under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) The current status of the development and implementation of the framework required by subsection (a). (B) A description of the efforts undertaken by the Secretary to evaluate the matters for consideration set forth in subsection (c). (C) The current status of any pilot programs the Secretary is carrying out to develop the framework. 1635. Role of Chief Information Officer in improving enterprise-wide cybersecurity (a) In general In carrying out the responsibilities established in section 142 of title 10, United States Code, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall, to the maximum extent practicable, ensure that the cybersecurity programs and capabilities of the Department— (1) fit into an enterprise-wide cybersecurity architecture; (2) are maximally interoperable with each other, including those deployed by the components of the Department; (3) enhance enterprise-level visibility and responsiveness to threats; and (4) are developed, procured, instituted, and managed in a cost-efficient manner, exploiting economies of scale and enterprise-wide services and discouraging unnecessary customization and piecemeal acquisition. (b) Requirements In carrying out subsection (a), the Chief Information Officer shall— (1) manage and modernize the cybersecurity architecture of the Department, including— (A) ensuring the cybersecurity architecture of the Department maximizes cybersecurity capability, network, and endpoint activity data-sharing across Department components; (B) ensuring the cybersecurity architecture of the Department supports improved automaticity of cybersecurity detection and response; and (C) modernizing and configuring the Department’s standardized deployed perimeter, network-level, and endpoint capabilities to improve interoperability, meet pressing capability needs, and negate common adversary tactics, techniques, and procedures; (2) establish mechanisms to enable and mandate, as necessary, cybersecurity capability, and network and endpoint activity data-sharing across Department components; (3) make mission data, through data tagging, automatic transmission, and other means, accessible and discoverable by Department components other than owners of those mission data; (4) incorporate emerging cybersecurity technologies from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Strategic Capabilities Office, the Defense Innovation Unit, the laboratories of the military departments, and the commercial sector into the cybersecurity architecture of the Department; and (5) ensure that the Department possesses the necessary computing infrastructure, through technology refresh, installation or acquisition of bandwidth, and the use of cloud computing power, to host and enable necessary cybersecurity capabilities. 1636. Quarterly assessments of the readiness of cyber forces (a) In general Section 484(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5); and (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following new paragraph (4): (4) An assessment of the readiness of the Cyber Mission Forces that— (A) addresses all of the abilities of the Department to conduct cyberspace operations based on capability and capacity of personnel, equipment, training, and equipment condition— (i) using both quantitative and qualitative metrics; and (ii) in a way that is common to all military departments; and (B) is consistent with readiness reporting pursuant to section 482 of this title. . (b) Metrics (1) Establishment required The Secretary of Defense shall establish metrics for the assessment of the readiness of the Cyber Mission Forces of the Department of Defense. (2) Briefing required Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary will provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees on the metrics established pursuant to paragraph (1). (c) Modification of readiness reporting system Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall take such actions as the Secretary considers appropriate to ensure that the comprehensive readiness reporting system established pursuant to section 117(a) of title 10, United States Code, covers matters relating to the readiness of the Cyber Mission Forces— (1) using the metrics established pursuant to subsection (b)(1); and (2) in a manner that is consistent with sections 117 and 482 of such title. (d) First quarterly briefing assessing cyber readiness The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 1637. Control and analysis of Department of Defense data stolen through cyberspace (a) Requirements When the Secretary of Defense determines that significant Department of Defense information may have been stolen through cyberspace and evidence of theft of the data in question— (1) is in the possession of a component of the Department, the Secretary shall— (A) either transfer or replicate and transfer such Department data in a prompt and secure manner to a secure repository with access by Department personnel appropriately limited on a need-to-know basis; (B) ensure the Department applies such automated analytic tools and capabilities to the repository of potentially compromised data as are necessary to rapidly understand the scope and effect of the potential compromise; (C) for high priority Department systems, develop analytic products that characterize the scope of data compromised; (D) ensure that all mission-affected entities in the Department are made aware of the theft or possible theft and, as damage assessment and mitigation proceeds, are kept apprised of the extent of the data stolen; and (E) ensure that the Department counterintelligence organizations are— (i) fully integrated with any damage assessment team assigned to the breach; (ii) fully informed of the data that have or potentially have been stolen and the effect of such theft; and (iii) provided resources and tasked, in conjunction with subject matter experts and responsible authorities, to immediately develop and execute countermeasures in response to a breach involving espionage and data theft; or (2) is in the possession of or under controls or restrictions imposed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, or a national counterintelligence or intelligence organization, the Secretary shall determine, jointly with the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation or the Director of National Intelligence, as appropriate, the most expeditious process, means, and conditions for carrying out the activities otherwise required by paragraph (1). (b) Recommendations Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees such recommendations as the Secretary may have for legislative or administrative action to address such barriers as may be inhibiting the implementation of this section. 1638. Accreditation standards and processes for cybersecurity and information technology products and services (a) Assessment The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall conduct an enterprise assessment of accreditation of standards and processes for cybersecurity and information technology products and services. (b) Report (1) In general Not later than April 1, 2020, the Chief Information Officer shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the assessment conducted under subsection (a). (2) Contents The report submitted under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) The findings of the Chief Information Officer with respect to the assessment conducted under subsection (a). (B) A description of the modifications proposed or enacted to accreditation standards and processes arising out of the assessment. (C) A description of how the Department will increasingly automate accreditation processes, pursue agile development, incorporate machine learning, and foster reciprocity across authorizing officials. 1639. Extension of authorities for Cyberspace Solarium Commission Section 1652(k) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking September 1, 2019 February 1, 2020 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking and intelligence committees committees, the congressional intelligence committees, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate, and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives 1640. Modification of elements of assessment required for termination of dual-hat arrangement for Commander of the United States Cyber Command Section 1642(b)(2)(C) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (130 Stat. 2601; Public Law 114–328 (1) in clause (ii), by inserting and national intelligence operations operations (2) by amending clause (iii) to read as follows: (iii) The tools, weapons, and accesses used in and available for military cyber operations are sufficient for achieving required effects and United States Cyber Command is capable of acquiring or developing these tools, weapons, and accesses. ; and (3) by amending clause (vi) to read as follows: (vi) The cyber mission force has achieved full operational capability and has demonstrated the capacity to execute the cyber missions of the Department, including— (I) execution of national-level missions through cyberspace, including deterrence and disruption of adversary cyber activity; (II) defense of the Department of Defense Information Network; and (III) support for other combatant commands, including targeting of adversary military assets. . 1641. Use of National Security Agency cybersecurity expertise to support acquisition of commercial cybersecurity products (a) Advisory mission The National Security Agency shall, as a mission in its role in securing the information systems of the Department of Defense, advise and assist the Department of Defense in its acquisition and adaptation of cybersecurity products and services from industry, especially the commercial cybersecurity sector. (b) Program to improve acquisition of cybersecurity products and services (1) Establishment Consistent with paragraph (1), the Director of the National Security Agency shall establish a permanent program consisting of market research, testing, and expertise transmission, or augments to existing programs, to improve the acquisition by the Department of cybersecurity products and services. (2) Requirements Under the program established pursuant to paragraph (1), the Director shall, independently and at the request of components of the Department— (A) test and evaluate commercially-available cybersecurity products and services using— (i) generally known cyber operations techniques; and (ii) tools and cyber operations techniques and advanced tools and techniques available to the National Security Agency; (B) develop and establish standard procedures, techniques, and threat-informed metrics to perform the testing and evaluation required by subparagraph (A); and (C) advise the Secretary of Defense on the merits and disadvantages of evaluated cybersecurity products, including with respect to— (i) any synergies between products; (ii) value; (iii) matters relating to operation and maintenance; and (iv) matters relating to customization requirements. (3) Limitations The program established under paragraph (1) shall not— (A) by used to accredit cybersecurity products and services for use by the Department; (B) create approved products lists; or (C) be used for acquisition contracts for the procurement and fielding of cybersecurity products on behalf of the Department. 1642. Study on future cyber warfighting capabilities of Department of Defense (a) Study required Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall direct the Defense Science Board to carry out a study on the future cyber warfighting capabilities of the Department of Defense. (b) Participation Participants in the study shall include the following: (1) Such members of the Board, including members of the Task Force on Cyber Deterrence of the Board, as the Chairman of the Board considers appropriate for the study. (2) Such additional temporary members or contracted support as the Secretary— (A) selects from those recommended by the Chairman for purposes of the study; and (B) considers to have significant technical, policy, or military expertise. (c) Elements The study conducted pursuant to subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A technical evaluation of the Joint Cyber Warfighting Architecture of the Department, especially the Unified Platform, Joint Cyber Command and Control, and Persistent Cyber Training Environment, including with respect to the following: (A) The suitability of the requirements and, as relevant, the delivered capability of such architecture to modern cyber warfighting. (B) Such requirements or capabilities as may be absent or underemphasized in such architecture. (C) The speed of development and acquisition as compared to mission need. (D) Identification of potential duplication of efforts among the programs and concepts evaluated. (E) The coherence of such architecture with the National Mission Teams and Combat Mission Teams of the Cyber Mission Force, as constituted and organized on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act. (F) The coherence of such architecture with the Cyber Protection Teams of the Cyber Mission Force and the cybersecurity service providers of the Department, as constituted and organized on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act. (G) The coherence of such architecture with the concepts of persistent engagement and defending forward as incorporated in the 2018 Department of Defense Cyber Strategy, including with respect to operational concepts such as consistent spy-on-spy deterrence, securing adversary operating pictures, and preemptively feeding indicators and warning to defensive operators. (2) A technical evaluation of the tool development and acquisition programs of the Department, including with respect to the following: (A) The suitability of planned tool suite and cyber armory constructs of the United States Cyber Command to modern cyber warfighting. (B) The speed of development and acquisition as compared to mission need. (C) The resourcing and effectiveness of the internal tool development of the United States Cyber Command as compared to the tool development of the National Security Agency. (D) The resourcing and effectiveness of the internal tool development of the United States Cyber Command as compared to its acquisition. (E) The coherence of such programs with the concepts of persistent engagement and defending forward as incorporated in the 2018 Department of Defense Cyber Strategy, including with respect to operational concepts such as consistent spy-on-spy deterrence, securing adversary operating pictures, and preemptively feeding indicators and warning to defensive operators. (3) An evaluation of the operational planning and targeting of the United States Cyber Command, including support for regional combatant commands, and suitability for modern cyber warfighting. (4) Development of such recommendations as the Board may have for legislative or administrative action relating to the future cyber warfighting capabilities of the Department. (d) Access to information The Secretary shall provide the Board with timely access to appropriate information, data, resources, and analysis so that the Board may conduct a thorough and independent analysis as required under this section. (e) Report (1) Transmittal to Secretary Not later than November 1, 2021, the Board shall transmit to the Secretary a final report on the study conducted pursuant to subsection (a). (2) Transmittal to congress Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary receives the final report under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees such report and such comments as the Secretary considers appropriate. 1643. Authority to use operation and maintenance funds for cyber operations-peculiar capability development projects (a) In general Subchapter I of chapter 134 section 2243 2243a. Authority to use operation and maintenance funds for cyber operations-peculiar capability development projects (a) In general Subject to subsection (c), the covered officials may each use amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance, to carry out cyber operations-peculiar capability development projects. (b) Covered officials For purposes of this section, the covered officials are as follows: (1) The Secretary of the Army. (2) The Secretary of the Navy. (3) The Secretary of the Air Force. (4) The Commandant of the Marine Corps. (c) Limitation In a fiscal year, the aggregate amount that may be used by a single covered official under subsection (a) may not exceed $3,000,000. (d) Relationship to other laws The authority in subsection (a) may be used without regard to any provision of law establishing a limit on the unit cost of an investment item that may be purchased with funds made available for operation and maintenance. . (b) Table of sections amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2243 the following new item: 2243a. Authority to use operation and maintenance funds for cyber operations-peculiar capability development projects. . (c) Reports (1) In general In each of fiscal years 2021, 2022, and 2023, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the use of the authority provided under section 2243a(a) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), during the previous fiscal year. (2) Timing Each report submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be submitted concurrently with the annual budget request of the President submitted pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code. 1644. Expansion of authority for access and information relating to cyberattacks on Department of Defense operationally critical contractors Section 391(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (3)— (A) by amending subparagraph (A) to read as follows: (A) include mechanisms for Department personnel— (i) if requested by an operationally critical contractor, to assist the contractor in detecting and mitigating penetrations; or (ii) at the request of the Department, to obtain access to equipment or information of an operationally critical contractor necessary to conduct a forensic analysis, in addition to any analysis conducted by the contractor; and ; and (B) in subparagraph (B)— (i) by striking to determine whether information (i) information ; (ii) in clause (i), as so designated— (I) by inserting or compromised on exfiltrated from (II) by striking the period at the end and inserting or compromised; or (iii) by adding at the end the following new clause: (ii) the ability of the contractor to provide operationally critical support has been affected and, if so, how and to what extent it has been affected. ; (2) in paragraph (4), by inserting , so as to minimize delays in or any curtailing of the Department’s cyber response and defensive actions specific person (3) in paragraph (5)(C), by inserting or counterintelligence activities investigations 1645. Briefing on memorandum of understanding relating to joint operational planning and control of cyber attacks of national scale (a) Briefing required Not later than March 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall provide the appropriate committees of Congress a briefing on the Joint Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security Memorandum of Understanding signed by the Secretary of Defense on October 6, 2018. (b) Elements The briefing required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) The number of planners assigned by the Department of Defense to line of effort three and line of effort four and the areas of expertise of those planners. (2) Whether the planners described in paragraph (1) are physically co-located with their counterparts in the Department of Homeland Security and are assigned full-time or part-time to line of effort three and line of effort four. (3) Whether the planners described in paragraph (1) are developing operational plans and playbooks that will be implemented in response to actual cyber attacks of national scale or whether the planning activities are limited to planning and exercise scenarios. (4) Whether the official in charge of the planners assigned to line of effort three and line of effort four has or will have operational control of a Federal response to a cyber attack of national scale. (5) Whether the National Cyber Strategy, published in September 2018, provides for a standing joint multi-agency organization and staff to plan and direct operational responses to cyber attacks of national scale. (6) The charter and implementation plan of the Joint Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security Cyber Protection and Defense Steering Group required by the memorandum of understanding described in subsection (a). (c) Definition of appropriate committees of Congress In this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress (1) the congressional defense committees; (2) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; and (3) the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives. 1646. Study to determine the optimal strategy for structuring and manning elements of the Joint Force Headquarters–Cyber organizations, Joint Mission Operations Centers, and Cyber Operations–Integrated Planning Elements (a) Study (1) In general The Principal Cyber Advisor of the Department of Defense shall conduct a study to determine the optimal strategy for structuring and manning elements of the following: (A) Joint Force Headquarters–Cyber organizations. (B) Joint Mission Operations Centers. (C) Cyber Operations–Integrated Planning Elements. (2) Elements The study conducted under subsection (a) shall include assessment of the following: (A) Operational effects on the military services if the entities listed in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of paragraph (1) are restructured from organizations that are service component organizations to joint organizations. (B) Organizational effects on the military services if the billets associated with the entities listed in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of paragraph (1) are transferred to United States Cyber Command and designated as joint billets for joint qualification purposes. (b) Report (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Principal Cyber Advisor shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the study conducted under subsection (a). (2) Contents The report submitted under paragraph (1) shall contain the following: (A) The findings of the Principal Cyber Advisor with respect to the study conducted under subsection (a). (B) Details of the operational and organizational effects assessed under subsection (a)(2). (C) A plan to carry out the transfer described in subsection (a)(2)(B) and the associated costs. (D) Such other matters as the Principal Cyber Advisor considers appropriate. 1647. Cyber governance structures and Principal Cyber Advisors on military cyber force matters (a) Designation (1) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, each Secretary of a military department shall designate a Principal Cyber Advisor to act as the principal advisor to the Secretary of the military department on the cyber forces, cyber programs, and cybersecurity matters of the military department, including matters relating to weapons systems, enabling infrastructure, and the defense industrial base. (2) Nature of position Each Principal Cyber Advisor position under paragraph (1) shall be a senior civilian leadership position. (b) Responsibilities Principal Cyber Advisors Each Principal Cyber Advisor of a military department shall be responsible for advising the Secretary of the military department and coordinating and overseeing the implementation of policy, strategies, sustainment, and plans on the following: (1) The resourcing and training of the military cyber forces of the military department and ensuring that such resourcing and training meets the needs of United States Cyber Command. (2) Acquisition of offensive and defensive cyber capabilities for the military cyber forces of the military department. (3) Cybersecurity management and operations of the military department. (4) Acquisition of cybersecurity tools and capabilities for the cybersecurity service providers of the military department. (5) Improving and enforcing a culture of cybersecurity warfighting and responsibility throughout the military department. (c) Administrative matters (1) Designation of individuals In designating a Principal Cyber Adviser under subsection (a), the Secretary of a military department may designate an individual in an existing position in the military department. (2) Coordination The Principal Cyber Advisor of a military department shall work in close coordination with the Principal Cyber Advisor of the Department of Defense, the Chief Information Officer of the Department, relevant military service chief information officers, and other relevant military service officers to ensure service compliance with the Department of Defense Cyber Strategy. (d) Responsibility to the senior acquisition executives In addition to the responsibilities set forth in subsection (b), the Principal Cyber Advisor of a military department shall be responsible for advising the senior acquisition executive of the military department and, as determined by the Secretary of the military department, for advising and coordinating and overseeing the implementation of policy, strategies, sustainment, and plans for— (1) cybersecurity of the industrial base; and (2) cybersecurity of Department of Defense information systems and information technology services, including how cybersecurity threat information is incorporated and the development of cyber practices, cyber testing, and mitigation of cybersecurity risks. (e) Review of current responsibilities (1) In general Not later than January 1, 2021, each Secretary of a military department shall review the military department's current governance model for cybersecurity with respect to current authorities and responsibilities. (2) Elements Each review under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An assessment of whether additional changes beyond the designation of a Principal Cyber Advisor pursuant to subsection (a) are required. (B) Consideration of whether the current governance structure and assignment of authorities— (i) enable effective top-down governance; (ii) enable effective Chief Information Officer and Chief Information Security Officer action; (iii) are adequately consolidated so that the authority and responsibility for cybersecurity risk management is clear and at an appropriate level of seniority; (iv) provides authority to a single individual to certify compliance of Department information systems and information technology services with all current cybersecurity standards; and (v) support efficient coordination across the military departments and services, the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Defense Information Systems Agency, and United States Cyber Command. (f) Briefing Not later than February 1, 2021, each Secretary of a military department shall brief the congressional defense committees on the findings of the Secretary with respect to the review conducted by the Secretary under subsection (e). 1648. Designation of test networks for testing and accreditation of cybersecurity products and services (a) Designation Not later than April 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall designate, for use by the Defense Information Systems Agency and such other components of the Department of Defense as the Secretary considers appropriate, three test networks for the testing and accreditation of cybersecurity products and services. (b) Requirements The networks designated under subsection (a) shall— (1) be of sufficient scale to realistically test cybersecurity products and services; (2) feature substantially different architectures and configurations; (3) be live, operational networks; and (4) feature cybersecurity processes, tools, and technologies that are appropriate for test purposes and representative of the processes, tools, and technologies that are widely used throughout the Department. 1649. Consortia of universities to advise Secretary of Defense on cybersecurity matters (a) Establishment The Secretary of Defense shall establish one or more consortia to advise and assist the Secretary on matters relating to cybersecurity. (b) Membership The consortium or consortia established under subsection (a) shall consist of universities that have been designated as centers of academic excellence by the Director of the National Security Agency or the Secretary of Homeland Security. (c) Organization (1) Designation of administrative chair and terms For each consortium established under subsection (a), the Secretary, based on recommendations from the members of the consortium, shall designate one member of the consortium to function as an administrative chair of the consortium for a term with a specific duration specified by the Secretary. (2) Subsequent terms No member of a consortium designated under paragraph (1) may serve as the administrative chair of that consortium for two consecutive terms. (3) Duties of administrative chair Each administrative chair designated under paragraph (1) for a consortium shall— (A) act as the leader of the consortium for the term specified by the Secretary under paragraph (1); (B) be the liaison between the consortium and the Secretary; (C) distribute requests from the Secretary for advice and assistance to appropriate members of the consortium and coordinate responses back to the Secretary; and (D) act as a clearinghouse for Department of Defense requests relating to advice and assistance on matters relating to cybersecurity and to provide feedback to the Secretary from members of the consortium. (d) Functions The functions of a consortium established under subsection (a) are as follows: (1) To provide to the Secretary access to the expertise of the members of the consortium on matters relating to cybersecurity. (2) To align the efforts of such members in support of the Department. (3) To act as a facilitator in responding to Department requests relating to advice and assistance on matters relating to cybersecurity and to provide feedback to the Secretary from members of the consortium. (e) Procedures The Secretary shall establish procedures for organizations within the Department to access the work product produced by and the research, capabilities, and expertise of a consortium established under subsection (a) and the universities that constitute the consortium. D Nuclear Forces 1661. Modification of authorities relating to nuclear command, control, and communications system (a) Duties and powers of Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment Section 133b(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraphs (4), (5), (6), and (7) as paragraphs (5), (6), (7), and (8), respectively; (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following new paragraph (4): (4) establishing policies for, and providing oversight, guidance, and coordination with respect to, the nuclear command, control, and communications system; ; and (3) in paragraph (6), as redesignated by paragraph (1), by inserting after overseeing the modernization of nuclear forces , including the nuclear command, control, and communications system, (b) Duties and responsibilities of chief information officer Section 142(b)(1) of such title is amended— (1) by striking subparagraph (G); and (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (H) and (I) as subparagraphs (G) and (H), respectively. 1662. Expansion of officials required to conduct biennial assessments of delivery platforms for nuclear weapons and nuclear command and control system Section 492(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ; and (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (4) the Commander of the United States Air Forces in Europe. . 1663. Conforming amendment to Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, Control, and Communications System Section 171a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking , Technology, and Logistics and Sustainment 1664. Prohibition on reduction of the intercontinental ballistic missiles of the United States (a) Prohibition Except as provided by subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Department of Defense shall be obligated or expended for— (1) reducing, or preparing to reduce, the responsiveness or alert level of the intercontinental ballistic missiles of the United States; or (2) reducing, or preparing to reduce, the quantity of deployed intercontinental ballistic missiles of the United States to a number less than 400. (b) Exception The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to any of the following activities: (1) The maintenance or sustainment of intercontinental ballistic missiles. (2) Ensuring the safety, security, or reliability of intercontinental ballistic missiles. 1665. Briefing on long-range standoff weapon and sea-launched cruise missile Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in consultation with the Administrator for Nuclear Security, shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a briefing on opportunities— (1) to increase commonality between the long-range standoff weapon and the sea-launched cruise missile; and (2) to leverage, in the development of the sea-launched cruise missile, technologies developed, or under development as of the date of the briefing, as part of the long-range standoff weapon program. 1666. Sense of the Senate on industrial base for Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent program It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) ensuring the viability of an industrial base of at least two domestic producers of large solid rocket motors for the ground-based strategic deterrent program is an important national security interest; and (2) in continuing to carry out that program, the Secretary of Defense should— (A) strive to maintain competition and proper vendor capabilities in order to maintain the best value for the Government; (B) consider the long-term health and viability of the industrial base when structuring and awarding major procurement or development contracts; and (C) when appropriate, structure programs to provide stability to the industrial base by maintaining continued production for an extended period. 1667. Sense of the Senate on nuclear deterrence commitments of the United States It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) credible extended deterrence commitments make key contributions to the security of the United States, international stability, and the nonproliferation objectives of the United States; (2) the nuclear forces of the United States, as well as the independent nuclear forces of other members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (in this section referred to as NATO (3) the forward-deployment of dual-capable aircraft operated by the United States, and the participation of certain NATO members in the nuclear deterrence mission, are vitally important to the deterrence and defense posture of NATO; (4) such aircraft provide a credible and flexible nuclear capability that plays a fundamental role in regional deterrence and effectively assuring allies and partners of the commitment of the United States to their security; and (5) nuclear-certified F–35A aircraft provide the most advanced nuclear fighter capability in the current and future anti-access area denial environments. E Missile defense programs 1671. Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system and Israeli cooperative missile defense program co-development and co-production (a) Iron Dome Short-Range Rocket Defense System (1) Availability of funds Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for procurement, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency, not more than $95,000,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel to procure components for the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system through co-production of such components in the United States by industry of the United States. (2) Conditions (A) Agreement Funds described in paragraph (1) for the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program shall be available subject to the terms and conditions in the Agreement Between the Department of Defense of the United States of America and the Ministry of Defense of the State of Israel Concerning Iron Dome Defense System Procurement, signed on March 5, 2014, as amended to include co-production for Tamir interceptors. (B) Certification Not later than 30 days prior to the initial obligation of funds described in paragraph (1), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees— (i) a certification that the amended bilateral international agreement specified in subparagraph (A) is being implemented as provided in such agreement; and (ii) an assessment detailing any risks relating to the implementation of such agreement. (b) Israeli Cooperative Missile Defense Program, David's Sling Weapon System co-production (1) In general Subject to paragraph (3), of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for procurement, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency not more than $50,000,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel to procure the David's Sling Weapon System, including for co-production of parts and components in the United States by United States industry. (2) Agreement (A) Provision of funds specified in paragraph (1) shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the bilateral co-production agreement, including— (i) a one-for-one cash match is made by Israel or in another matching amount that otherwise meets best efforts (as mutually agreed to by the United States and Israel); and (ii) co-production of parts, components, and all-up rounds (if appropriate) in the United States by United States industry for the David's Sling Weapon System is not less than 50 percent. (3) Certification and assessment The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees— (A) a certification that the Government of Israel has demonstrated the successful completion of the knowledge points, technical milestones, and production readiness reviews required by the research, development, and technology agreement and the bilateral co-production agreement for the David's Sling Weapon System; and (B) an assessment detailing any risks relating to the implementation of such agreement. (c) Israeli Cooperative Missile Defense Program, Arrow 3 Upper Tier Interceptor Program Co-Production (1) In general Subject to paragraph (2), of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for procurement, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency not more than $55,000,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel for the Arrow 3 Upper Tier Interceptor Program, including for co-production of parts and components in the United States by United States industry. (2) Certification The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a certification that— (A) the Government of Israel has demonstrated the successful completion of the knowledge points, technical milestones, and production readiness reviews required by the research, development, and technology agreement for the Arrow 3 Upper Tier Interceptor Program; (B) funds specified in paragraph (1) will be provided on the basis of a one-for-one cash match made by Israel or in another matching amount that otherwise meets best efforts (as mutually agreed to by the United States and Israel); (C) the United States has entered into a bilateral international agreement with Israel that establishes, with respect to the use of such funds— (i) in accordance with subparagraph (D), the terms of co-production of parts and components on the basis of the greatest practicable co-production of parts, components, and all-up rounds (if appropriate) by United States industry and minimizes nonrecurring engineering and facilitization expenses to the costs needed for co-production; (ii) complete transparency on the requirement of Israel for the number of interceptors and batteries that will be procured, including with respect to the procurement plans, acquisition strategy, and funding profiles of Israel; (iii) technical milestones for co-production of parts and components and procurement; (iv) a joint affordability working group to consider cost reduction initiatives; and (v) joint approval processes for third-party sales; and (D) the level of co-production described in subparagraph (C)(i) for the Arrow 3 Upper Tier Interceptor Program is not less than 50 percent. (d) Number In carrying out paragraph (2) of subsection (b) and paragraph (2) of subsection (c), the Under Secretary may submit— (1) one certification covering both the David's Sling Weapon System and the Arrow 3 Upper Tier Interceptor Program; or (2) separate certifications for each respective system. (e) Timing The Under Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the certification and assessment under subsection (b)(3) and the certification under subsection (c)(2) by not later than 30 days before the funds specified in paragraph (1) of subsections (b) and (c) for the respective system covered by the certification are provided to the Government of Israel. (f) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees (1) The congressional defense committees. (2) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1672. Expansion of national missile defense policy and program redesignation (a) Sense of the Senate It is the Sense of the Senate that— (1) the United States must continue to pursue a comprehensive missile defense strategy that will deliver integrated and effective capabilities to counter ballistic, cruise, and hypersonic missile threats; (2) adversaries are quickly expanding the capabilities of their existing missile systems, adding new and unprecedented types of missile capabilities to their arsenals, and further integrating offensive missiles into their coercive threats, military exercises, and war planning; (3) both Russia and China are rapidly enhancing their existing offensive missile systems and developing advanced sea-, ground-, and air-launched cruise missiles as well as hypersonic capabilities; (4) due to the proliferation of offensive ballistic and cruise missiles and the emergence of game-changing hypersonic weapons technologies, all of which threaten regional balances, our allies and partners, United States deployed armed forces, and the United States homeland, missile defenses become an even more critical element of United States strategy; and (5) the United States must outpace adversary offensive missile capabilities. (b) Expansion of policy Section 1681(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 10 U.S.C. 2431 ballistic missile threat ballistic, cruise, and hypersonic missile threats (c) Redesignation requirement Not later than the date on which the President submits to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the annual budget request of the President for fiscal year 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall, as the Secretary considers appropriate, redesignate all strategies, policies, programs, and systems under the jurisdiction of the Secretary to reflect that missile defense programs of the United States defend against ballistic, cruise, and hypersonic missiles in all phases of flight. 1673. Acceleration of the deployment of persistent space-based sensor architecture (a) Sense of the Senate It is the Sense of the Senate that— (1) Congress has expressed support for a space-based missile defense sensor program, in the two most recent enacted National Defense Authorization Acts; (2) the Secretary of Defense should rapidly develop and deploy a persistent, space-based sensor architecture to ensure missile defenses of the United States are more effective against ballistic missile threats and more responsive to emergent threats from hypersonic and cruise missiles; (3) the responsibility for developing and deploying a hypersonic and ballistic tracking space sensor should remain within the Director of the Missile Defense Agency; and (4) the Director of the Missile Defense Agency should deploy a hypersonic and ballistic tracking space sensor constellation as soon as technically feasible. (b) Assignment of primary responsibility for development and deployment of hypersonic and ballistic tracking space sensor Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall— (1) assign the Director of the Missile Defense Agency with the principal responsibility for the development and deployment of a hypersonic and ballistic tracking space sensor; and (2) submit to the congressional defense committees certification of such assignment. (c) Certification regarding funding of hypersonic and ballistic tracking space sensor program At the same time that the President submits to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the annual budget request of the President for fiscal year 2021, the Under Secretary of Defense Comptroller and the Director for Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall jointly certify to the congressional defense committees whether the hypersonic and ballistic tracking space sensor program is sufficiently funded in the future-years defense program for the Missile Defense Agency. (d) Deployment deadline Section 1683(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 10 U.S.C. 2431 (1) by striking (a) In general (a) Development, testing, and deployment (1) Development ; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (2) Testing and deployment The Director shall begin on-orbit testing of a hypersonic and ballistic tracking space sensor no later than December 31, 2021, with full operational deployment as soon as technically feasible thereafter. (3) Waiver The Secretary of Defense may waive the deadline for testing specified in paragraph (2) if the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees a report containing— (A) the explanation why the Secretary cannot meet such deadline; (B) the technical risks and estimated cost of accelerating the program to attempt to meet such deadline; (C) an assessment of threat systems that could not be detected or tracked persistently due to waiving such deadline; and (D) a plan, including a timeline, for beginning the required testing. . (e) Report on progress (1) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the progress of all efforts being made by the Missile Defense Agency, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Air Force, and the Space Development Agency relating to space-based sensing and tracking capabilities for missile defense and how each of such organizations will work together to avoid duplication of efforts. (2) Form The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 1674. Nonstandard acquisition processes of Missile Defense Agency (a) Sense of the Senate It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) the Department of Defense needs to provide capabilities at the speed of relevance that are more lethal, and to ensure acquisition processes fulfill the needs of members of the Armed Forces now and in the future; (2) significant defense acquisition reforms enacted over the past three National Defense Authorization Acts have improved access to nontraditional and commercial innovation and to expanded flexible acquisition authorities in the development of alternative acquisition pathways to acquire critical national security capabilities; (3) the Department appropriately recently recognized the Missile Defense Agency for its acquisition success by presenting it with the 2018 David Packard Excellence in Acquisition Award for the development of the Space-Based Kill Assessment (SKA) program and the Missile Defense Agency should be commended for its numerous and rapid acquisition successes; (4) the recently completed Missile Defense Review explicitly highlights, in stark terms, the threat posed to the United States by ballistic and hypersonic missile threats; and (5) the Missile Defense Agency should maintain its nonstandard acquisition authorities in order to continue to rapidly design, test, and deliver critically needed defensive capabilities to the warfighter. (b) Changes to nonstandard acquisition processes and responsibilities (1) Limitation None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be obligated or expended to change the nonstandard acquisition processes and responsibilities described in paragraph (2) until the Secretary— (A) has consulted with the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, the secretaries of the military departments, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Commander of United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM), the Commander of United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM), and the Director of the Missile Defense Agency; (B) certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary has coordinated the changes with and received the views of the individuals referred to in subparagraph (A); (C) submits to the congressional defense committees a report describing the changes, the rationale for the changes, and the views of the individuals referred to in subparagraph (A) with respect to such changes; and (D) a period of 270 days has elapsed since submittal of the report under subparagraph (C). (2) Nonstandard acquisition processes and responsibilities described The nonstandard acquisition processes and responsibilities described in this paragraph are such processes and responsibilities described in— (A) the memorandum of the Secretary of Defense titled Missile Defense Program Direction (B) Department of Defense Directive 5134.09, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. 1675. Plan for the Redesigned Kill Vehicle (a) Report required The Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the delay in the Redesigned Kill Vehicle Program. (b) Elements The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A description of the reason for the delay. (2) An overview of the revised program schedule including a revised test plan and revised acquisition strategy. (3) A detailed description of any recommendations that could be utilized to accelerate the scheduled fielding including modifications to the acquisition strategy or the procurement and assembly of long-lead materials unaffected by the reason for the delay. (4) A timeline associated with such recommendations. (5) Additional funding required to carry out such recommendations. (6) An assessment of risk associated with such recommendations. (7) A description of any recommendations that were submitted to the Director by contractors that the Director considers reasonable but were not adopted. (8) An explanation as to why the recommendations described in paragraph (7) were not adopted. (c) Form of report The report required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. 1676. Report on improving ground-based midcourse defense element of ballistic missile defense system (a) Report required Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on— (1) options to increase the capability, capacity, and reliability of the ground-based midcourse defense element of the United States ballistic missile defense system; and (2) the infrastructure requirements for increasing the number of ground-based interceptors as part of such element. (b) Contents The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An assessment of the requirements of the ground-based midcourse defense element of the United States ballistic missile defense system to meet threats outlined in the 2018 National Defense Strategy and the 2019 Missile Defense Review. (2) An assessment of the feasibility of fielding up to 104 ground-based interceptors as part of such element, including a description of the additional infrastructure and components needed to further outfit missile fields at Fort Greely, Alaska. (3) A cost estimate of such infrastructure and components. (4) An estimated schedule for completing such construction as may be required for such infrastructure and components. (5) An identification of any environmental assessments or impact studies that would need to be conducted to expand missile fields at Fort Greely beyond current capacity. (6) A determination of the appropriate fleet mix of ground-based interceptor kill vehicles and boosters to maximize overall system effectiveness and increase its capacity and capability, including the costs and benefits of continued inclusion of capability enhancement II block 1 interceptors after the fielding of the redesigned kill vehicle. (7) The modernization requirements for the ground-based midcourse system, including all command and control, ground systems, sensors and sensor interfaces, boosters and kill vehicles, and integration of known future systems and components. (8) A discussion of the obsolescence of such systems and components. (9) The industrial base requirements relating to the ground-based midcourse system, as determined by the Director of the Missile Defense Agency. (10) Such other matters as the Director considers appropriate. (c) Form The report submitted under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 1677. Sense of the Senate on recent Missile Defense Agency tests It is the Sense of the Senate that the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, the Missile Defense Agency, the Office of the Director for Operational Test and Evaluation, the operational test agencies, the military departments, and warfighters should— (1) be strongly commended for a highly successful 2018 flight test campaign, which consisted of 13 total flight test events including— (A) FTX–35, which successfully proved interoperability between Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) and the Phased Array Tracking Radar to Intercept on Target (PATRIOT) to detect and track a simulated engagement with a short-range ballistic missile; (B) Pacific Dragon 2018, which successfully demonstrated joint ballistic missile defense interoperability with Japan and Korea to engage a short-range ballistic missile with a Standard Missile 3 (SM–3) Block IB by a Japanese ship and an Aegis Ashore site; (C) JFTM–5, which successfully demonstrated the intercept of an short-range ballistic missile with a Standard Missile 3 Block IB threat upgrade from a Japanese ship; (D) FTM–45, which successfully demonstrated the intercept of a medium-range ballistic missile with a Standard Missile 3 Block IIA from a United States ship; and (E) FTI–03, which as a part of the operational test of the European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) Phase 3 architecture, successfully demonstrated the intercept of an intermediate-range ballistic missile using the Aegis Weapon System’s Engage-on-Remote capability; and (2) be especially recognized for the success of FTG-11, the first salvo test of the United States of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system, during which two ground-based interceptors were launched nearly simultaneously from the same location and successfully intercepted the kill vehicle of a threat-representative intercontinental ballistic missile target, and then the next most lethal object. 1678. Sense of the Senate on missile defense technology development priorities It is the sense of the Senate that— (1) the 2019 Missile Defense Review articulates a comprehensive approach to preventing and defeating the rapidly expanding offensive missile threat through a combination of deterrence, active and passive missile defense, and attack operations; (2) to counter the expanding offense missile capabilities of potential adversaries and hedge against unanticipated missile threats, the Secretary of Defense should aggressively pursue new missile defense capabilities and examine concepts and technologies for advanced missile defense systems; (3) the Secretary should fully implement the 2019 Missile Defense Review’s focus on increasing investments in and deploying new technologies and concepts; and (4) the Secretary should work to ensure that all missile defense systems are more survivable, including through— (A) more distributed air and missile defense operations; and (B) improved camouflage, concealment, and deception, including emission control. 1679. Publication of environmental impact statement prepared for certain potential future missile defense sites The Secretary of Defense shall make available to the public the environmental impact statement prepared pursuant to section 227(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (126 Stat. 1679; Public Law 112–239 F Other matters 1681. Matters relating to military operations in the information environment (a) Affirming the authority of the Secretary of Defense to conduct military operations in the information environment (1) In general Chapter 19 397. Military operations in the information environment (a) Affirmation of authority (1) Congress affirms that the Secretary of Defense is authorized to conduct military operations, including clandestine operations, in the information environment to defend the United States, allies of the United States, and interests of the United States, including in response to malicious influence activities carried out against the United States or a United States person by a foreign power. (2) The military operations referred to in paragraph (1), when appropriately authorized include the conduct of military operations short of hostilities and in areas outside of areas of active hostilities for the purpose of preparation of the environment, influence, force protection, and deterrence of hostilities. (b) Treatment of clandestine military operations in the information environment as traditional military activities A clandestine military operation in the information environment shall be considered a traditional military activity for the purposes of section 503(e)(2) of the National Security Act of 1947 ( 50 U.S.C. 3093(e)(2) (c) Quarterly information operations briefings (1) Not less frequently than once each quarter, the Secretary of Defense shall provide the congressional defense committees a briefing on significant military operations, including all clandestine operations in the information environment, carried out by the Department of Defense during the immediately preceding quarter. (2) Each briefing under subsection (1) shall include, with respect to the military operations in the information environment described in such paragraph, the following: (A) An update, disaggregated by geographic and functional command, that describes the operations carried out by the commands. (B) An overview of authorities and legal issues applicable to the operations, including any relevant legal limitations. (C) An outline of any interagency activities and initiatives relating to the operations. (D) Such other matters as the Secretary considers appropriate. (d) Rule of construction Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit, expand, or otherwise alter the authority of the Secretary to conduct military operations, including clandestine operations, in the information environment, to authorize specific military operations, or to limit, expand, or otherwise alter or otherwise affect the War Powers Resolution ( 50 U.S.C. 1541 (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The terms foreign person United States person 50 U.S.C. 1801 (2) The term hostilities 50 U.S.C. 1541 (3) The term clandestine military operation in the information environment (A) is marked by, held in, or conducted with secrecy, where the intent is that the operation or activity will not be apparent or acknowledged publicly; and (B) is to be carried out— (i) as part of a military operation plan approved by the President or the Secretary of Defense; (ii) to deter, safeguard, or defend against attacks or malicious influence activities against the United States, allies of the United States, and interests of the United States; or (iii) in support of hostilities or military operations involving the United States armed forces; or (iv) in support of military operations short of hostilities and in areas where hostilities are not occurring for the purpose of preparation of the environment, influence, force protection, and deterrence. . (2) Clerical amendments (A) Chapter 19 (i) Chapter heading The heading of chapter 19 of such title is amended to read as follows: 19 Cyber and Information Operations Matters . (ii) Table of sections The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 19 of such title is amended by inserting at the end the following new item: 397. Military operations in the information environment. . (B) Table of chapters The table of chapters for part I of subtitle A of such title is amended by striking the item relating to chapter 19 and inserting the following new item: 19. Cyber and Information Operations Matters 391 . (b) Principal Information Operations Advisor (1) Designation The Secretary of Defense shall designate, from among officials appointed to a position in the Department of Defense by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, a Principal Information Operations Advisor to act as the principal advisor to the Secretary on all aspects of information operations conducted by the Department. (2) Responsibilities The Principal Information Operations Advisor shall have the following responsibilities: (A) Oversight of policy, strategy, planning, resource management, operational considerations, personnel, and technology development across all the elements of information operations of the Department. (B) Overall integration and supervision of the deterrence of, conduct of, and defense against information operations. (C) Promulgation of policies to ensure adequate coordination and deconfliction with the Department of State, the intelligence community (as defined in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 ( 50 U.S.C. 3003 (D) Coordination with the head of the Global Engagement Center to support the purpose of the Center (as set forth by section 1287(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 22 U.S.C. 2656 (E) Establishing and supervising a rigorous risk management process to mitigate the risk of potential exposure of United States Persons to information intended exclusively for foreign audiences. (F) Development of guidance for, and promotion of, the capability of the Department to liaison with the private sector and academia on matters relating to the influence activities of malign actors. (G) Such other matters relating to information operations as the Secretary shall specify for purposes of this subsection. (c) Cross-functional team (1) Establishment The Principal Information Operations Advisor shall integrate the expertise in all elements of information operations and perspectives of appropriate organizations within the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Joint Staff, military departments, Defense Agencies, and combatant commands by establishing and maintaining a full-time cross-functional team composed of subject-matter experts selected from those organizations. (2) Selection and organization The cross-functional team established under paragraph (1) shall be selected, organized, and managed in a manner consistent with section 911 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 10 U.S.C. 111 (d) Designation of coordinating authority (1) Designation The Secretary of Defense shall designate United States Special Operations Command as the coordinating authority for information operations of the Department. (2) Responsibilities The combatant command designated under paragraph (1) shall be responsible for the following: (A) Synchronizing the Department’s information operations plans and operations across combatant commands. (B) Acting as the joint proponent for information operations capabilities. (e) Strategy and posture review (1) Strategy and posture review required The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Principal Information Operations Advisor and the cross-functional team established under subsection (c)(1), shall— (A) develop or update, as appropriate, a strategy for operations in the information environment; and (B) conduct an information operations posture review, including an analysis of capability gaps that inhibit the Department’s ability to successfully execute the strategy developed or updated pursuant to subparagraph (A). (2) Elements At a minimum, the strategy developed or updated pursuant to paragraph (1)(A) shall include the following: (A) The establishment of lines of effort, objectives, and tasks that are necessary to implement the strategy and eliminate the gaps identified under paragraph (1)(B). (B) Designation of offices of primary responsibility for implementing and achieving the tasks as set forth in the strategy. 1682. Extension of authorization for protection of certain facilities and assets from unmanned aircraft Section 130i(i) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 2020 2024 1683. Hard and deeply buried targets (a) Report required (1) In general Not later than December 1, 2019, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall, in consultation with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, submit to the congressional defense committees a classified report on hard and deeply buried targets. (2) Elements The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An estimate of the total number of high-value hard and deeply buried targets associated with Unites States military operations plans. (B) A description of the contents, functions, and hardening characteristics of the targets described in subparagraph (A), as well as their level of protection by anti-access and area denial capabilities. (C) An assessment of the current ability of the United States to hold such targets at risk using existing conventional and nuclear capabilities. (D) An assessment of the potential ability of the United States to hold such targets at risk using projected conventional and nuclear capabilities as of 2030. (b) Plan Not later than February 15, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan to ensure that the United States possesses by 2025 the capabilities to pose a credible deterrent threat against targets described in the report required by subsection (a). (c) Certification Not later than March 1, 2020, and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall certify to the congressional defense committees that the plan required by subsection (b) is being implemented in accordance with the 2025 deadline specified in that subsection. B Military construction authorizations 2001. Short title This division may be cited as the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law (a) Expiration of authorizations after five years Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained in titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire on the later of— (1) October 1, 2024; or (2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2025. (b) Exception Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have been obligated before the later of— (1) October 1, 2024; or (2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for fiscal year 2025 for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program. 2003. Effective date Titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX shall take effect on the later of— (1) October 1, 2019; or (2) the date of the enactment of this Act. XXI Army military construction 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects (a) Inside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Army: Inside the United States State Installation Amount Alabama Redstone Arsenal $38,000,000 Colorado Fort Carson $71,000,000 Georgia Fort Gordon $107,000,000 Hunter Army Airfield $62,000,000 Kentucky Fort Campbell $61,300,000 Massachusetts Soldier Systems Center Natick $50,000,000 Michigan Detroit Arsenal $24,000,000 New York Fort Drum $44,000,000 North Carolina Fort Bragg $12,500,000 Oklahoma Fort Sill $73,000,000 Pennsylvania Carlisle Barracks $98,000,000 South Carolina Fort Jackson $88,000,000 Texas Corpus Christi Army Depot $86,000,000 Fort Hood $50,500,000 Virginia Fort Belvoir $60,000,000 Joint Base Langley-Eustis $55,000,000 Washington Joint Base Lewis-McChord $46,000,000 (b) Outside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Army: Outside the United States Country Installation Amount Honduras Soto Cano Air Base $34,000,000 Japan Kadena Air Base $80,000,000 2102. Family housing (a) Construction and acquisition Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following table: Army: Family Housing State/Country Installation or Location Units Amount Pennsylvania Tobyhanna Army Depot Family Housing Replacement Construction $19,000,000 (b) Planning and design Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $9,222,000. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2019, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Army as specified in the funding table in section 4601. (b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 2104. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2019 project In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232 XXII Navy military construction 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects (a) Inside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Navy: Inside the United States State Installation or Location Amount Arizona Yuma $189,760,000 California Camp Pendleton $185,569,000 China Lake $64,500,000 Coronado $165,830,000 Marine Corps Air Station Miramar $37,400,000 Marine Corps Recruit Depot San Diego $9,900,000 Seal Beach $123,310,000 Travis Air Force Base $64,000,000 Connecticut New London $72,260,000 Florida Naval Air Station Jacksonville $32,420,000 Marine Corps Support Facility Blount Island $18,700,000 Hawaii Kaneohe Bay $134,050,000 West Loch $53,790,000 North Carolina Camp Lejeune $229,010,000 Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point $166,870,000 New River $11,320,000 South Carolina Marine Corps Recruit Depot Parris Island $37,200,000 Virginia Norfolk $79,100,000 Portsmouth $48,930,000 Quantico $143,350,000 Yorktown $59,000,000 Washington Bremerton $51,010,000 Keyport $25,050,000 Kitsap $48,000,000 Unspecified CONUS Zulu $59,600,000 (b) Outside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Navy: Outside the United States Country Installation or Location Amount Australia Darwin $211,500,000 Bahrain Island Southwest Asia $53,360,000 Guam Joint Region Marianas $226,000,000 Italy Sigonella $77,400,000 Japan Iwakuni $15,870,000 Yokosuka $174,692,000 2202. Family housing Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $5,863,000. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) of this Act and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $41,798,000. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2019, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy, as specified in the funding table in section 4601. (b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. XXIII Air Force military construction 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects (a) Inside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Air Force: Inside the United States State Installation or Location Amount Alaska Eielson Air Force Base $8,600,000 Arkansas Little Rock Air Force Base $47,000,000 California Travis Air Force Base $43,100,000 Colorado Peterson Air Force Base $54,000,000 Schriever Air Force Base $148,000,000 Illinois Scott Air Force Base $100,000,000 Missouri Whiteman Air Force Base $27,000,000 Montana Malmstrom Air Force Base $235,000,000 Nevada Nellis Air Force Base $65,200,000 New Mexico Holloman Air Force Base $20,000,000 Kirtland Air Force Base $37,900,000 North Dakota Minot Air Force Base $5,500,000 Texas Joint Base San Antonio $207,300,000 Utah Hill Air Force Base $114,500,000 Washington Fairchild Air Force Base $31,000,000 Wyoming F.E. Warren Air Force Base $18,100,000 Unspecified CONUS Zulu $31,200,000 Unspecified Worldwide Zulu $230,000,000 (b) Outside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Air Force: Outside the United States Country Installation or Location Amount Australia Tindal $70,600,000 Cyprus Royal Air Force Akrotiri $27,000,000 Guam Joint Region Marianas $65,000,000 Japan Kadena Air Base $31,500,000 Misawa Air Base $5,300,000 Yokota Air Base $12,400,000 Jordan Azraq $66,000,000 Mariana Islands Tinian $316,000,000 United Kingdom Royal Air Force Lakenheath $14,300,000 2302. Family housing Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $3,409,000. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $53,584,000. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2019, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Air Force, as specified in the funding table in section 4601. (b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2301 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 2305. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2015 project In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291 2306. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2016 project In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (division B of Public Law 114–92 Public Law 115–232 2307. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2017 project In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (division B of Public Law 114–328 Public Law 115–32 2308. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2018 projects (a) Joint Base San Antonio In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 115–91 (1) for construction of a dining and classroom facility the Secretary of the Air Force may construct a 750 square meter equipment building; and (2) for construction of an air traffic control tower the Secretary of the Air Force may construct a 636 square meter air traffic control tower. (b) Rygge In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2903 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 115–91 2309. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2019 projects (a) Hanscom Air Force Base In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232 (b) Royal Air Force Lakenheath In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232 XXIV Defense Agencies military construction 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects (a) Inside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Defense Agencies: Inside the United States State Installation or Location Amount California Beale Air Force Base $33,700,000 Camp Pendleton $17,700,000 CONUS Classified Classified Location $82,200,000 Florida Elgin Air Force Base $16,500,000 Hurlburt Field $108,386,000 Key West $16,000,000 Hawaii Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam $67,700,000 Maryland Fort Detrick $27,846,000 Mississippi Columbus Air Force Base $16,800,000 North Carolina Camp Lejeune $13,400,000 Fort Bragg $84,103,000 Oklahoma Tulsa International Airport $18,900,000 Rhode Island Quonset State Airport $11,600,000 South Carolina Joint Base Charleston $33,300,000 South Dakota Ellsworth Air Force Base $24,800,000 Virginia Dam Neck $12,770,000 Defense Distribution Depot Richmond $98,800,000 Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story $45,604,000 Pentagon $28,802,000 Washington Joint Base Lewis-McChord $47,700,000 Wisconsin General Mitchell International Airport $25,900,000 Unspecified CONUS Zulu $100,000,000 (b) Outside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Defense Agencies: Outside the United States Country Installation or Location Amount Germany Geilenkirchen Air Base $30,479,000 Ramstein Air Base $66,880,000 Guam Joint Region Marianas $19,200,000 Japan Yokota Air Base $136,411,000 Worldwide Classified Classified Location $52,000,000 2402. Authorized Energy Resilience and Conservation Investment Program projects (a) Inside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation projects as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 ERCIP Projects: Inside the United States State Installation or Location Amount California Mountain View $9,700,000 Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake $8,950,000 Naval Support Activity Monterey $10,540,000 Hawaii Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam $4,000,000 Louisiana Joint Reserve Base Naval Air Station New Orleans $5,340,000 Maryland South Potomac $18,460,000 Naval Support Activity Bethesda $13,840,000 New Mexico White Sands Missile Range $5,800,000 Texas Fort Hood $16,500,000 Camp Swift $4,500,000 Virginia National Reconnaissance Office Headquarters $66,000 Washington Naval Base Kitsap $23,670,000 (b) Outside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation projects as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 ERCIP Projects: Outside the United States Country Installation or Location Amount Guam Naval Base Guam $16,970,000 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2019, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military departments), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. (b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2401 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. XXV International programs A North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be appropriated for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction previously financed by the United States. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO (a) Authorization Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2019, for contributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program authorized by section 2501 as specified in the funding table in section 4601. (b) Authority to recognize NATO authorization amounts as budgetary resources for project execution When the United States is designated as the Host Nation for the purposes of executing a project under the NATO Security Investment Program (NSIP), the Department of Defense construction agent may recognize the NATO project authorization amounts as budgetary resources to incur obligations for the purposes of executing the NSIP project. B Host Country In-Kind Contributions 2511. Republic of Korea funded construction projects Pursuant to agreement with the Republic of Korea for required in-kind contributions, the Secretary of Defense may accept military construction projects for the installations or locations, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Republic of Korea Funded Construction Projects Country Component Installation or Location Project Amount Korea Army Camp Carroll Army Prepositioned Stock-4 Wheeled Vehicle Maintenance Facility $51,000,000 Army Camp Humphreys Unaccompanied Enlisted Personnel Housing, P1 $154,000,000 Army Camp Humphreys Unaccompanied Enlisted Personnel Housing, P2 $211,000,000 Army Camp Humphreys Satellite Communications Facility $32,000,000 Air Force Gwangju Air Base Hydrant Fuel System Upgrade Electrical $35,000,000 Air Force Kunsan Air Base Distribution System $14,200,000 Air Force Kunsan Air Base Dining Facility $21,000,000 Air Force Suwon Air Base Hydrant Fuel System $24,000,000 XXVI Guard and Reserve Forces facilities 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Army National Guard State Location Amount Alabama Anniston Army Depot $34,000,000 Foley $12,000,000 California Camp Roberts $12,000,000 Idaho Orchard Training Area $29,000,000 Maryland Havre de Grace $12,000,000 Massachusetts Camp Edwards $9,700,000 Minnesota New Ulm $11,200,000 Mississippi Camp Shelby $8,100,000 Missouri Springfield $12,000,000 Nebraska Bellevue $29,000,000 New Hampshire Concord $5,950,000 New York Jamaica Armory $91,000,000 Pennsylvania Moon Township $23,000,000 Vermont Camp Ethan Allen $30,000,000 Washington Richland $11,400,000 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Army Reserve State Location Amount Delaware Dover Air Force Base $21,000,000 Wisconsin Fort McCoy $25,000,000 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve State Location Amount Louisiana New Orleans $25,260,000 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Air National Guard State Location Amount California Moffett Air National Guard Base $57,000,000 Georgia Savannah/Hilton Head International Airport $24,000,000 Missouri Rosecrans Memorial Airport $9,500,000 Puerto Rico Luis Munoz Marin International Airport $50,000,000 Wisconsin Truax Field Air National Guard Base $34,000,000 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Air Force Reserve State Location Amount Georgia Robins Air Force Base $43,000,000 Minnesota Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport $9,800,000 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2019, for the costs of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, under chapter 1803 XXVII Base realignment and closure activities 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2019, for base realignment and closure activities, including real property acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510 10 U.S.C. 2687 Public Law 112–239 2702. Prohibition on conducting additional base realignment and closure (BRAC) round Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize an additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round. XXVIII Military construction general provisions A Military Construction Program 2801. Military installation resilience plans and projects of Department of Defense (a) Plans and projects (1) In general Subchapter I of chapter 169 2815. Military installation resilience plans (a) In general The Secretary of each military department shall ensure the maintenance and enhancement of military installation resilience through the development and implementation of military installation resilience plans under this section for each military installation under the jurisdiction of such Secretary that is in a coastal area. (b) Military installation resilience plans for National Guard installations The Secretary of a military department, subject to the availability of appropriations, may develop and implement a military installation resilience plan for a State-owned installation of the National Guard that is in a coastal area if— (1) such a plan is developed and implemented in coordination with the chief executive officer of the State in which the installation is located; and (2) such a plan is deemed, for purposes of any other provision of law, to be for lands or other geographical areas owned or controlled by the Department of Defense, or designated for use by the Department of Defense. (c) Required elements of plans To the extent appropriate and applicable, each military installation resilience plan under this section shall provide for the following: (1) A qualitative and, to the extent practicable, quantitative assessment of— (A) current risks and threats to the resilience of the military installation, including from extreme weather events, mean sea level fluctuation, flooding, and other changes in environmental conditions; and (B) future risks and threats, including from extreme weather events, mean sea level fluctuation, flooding, and other changes in environmental conditions, based on projections from reliable and authorized sources as described in section 2805(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232 10 U.S.C. 2864 (2) A description of the— (A) assets or infrastructure located on the installation vulnerable to the risks and threats described in paragraph (1), with special emphasis on assets or infrastructure critical to the accomplishment of the missions of the installation and missions of any members of the armed forces stationed at the installation; and (B) community infrastructure and resources located outside the military installation that are— (i) critical to the accomplishment of the missions of the military installation and of members of the armed forces stationed at the installation; and (ii) vulnerable to the risks and threats described in paragraph (1). (3) A description of the— (A) current or planned infrastructure projects or other measures to mitigate the impacts of risks and threats described in paragraph (1) to the resilience of the military installation and the accomplishment of the missions of the military installation and missions of members of the armed forces stationed at the installation; (B) estimated costs associated with such current or planned infrastructure projects or other mitigation measures; and (C) current or planned interagency agreements, cooperative agreements, memoranda of agreement, or other agreements with other Federal agencies, Indian tribes, State or local governments or entities, or other organizations or individuals for the purpose of or that will assist in maintaining or enhancing military installation resilience and the resilience of the community infrastructure and resources described in paragraph (2)(B). (d) Consistency and integration with other plans The Secretary of each military department shall ensure that each military installation resilience plan prepared by such Secretary under this section is— (1) consistent with the integrated natural resource management plan of the Secretary required by section 101(a)(1)(B) of the Sikes Act ( 16 U.S.C. 670a (2) consistent with and integrated into the installation energy resilience master plan of the Secretary required by section 2911(b)(3) of this title; and (3) consistent with and integrated into the installation master plan of the Secretary required by section 2864 of this title. (e) Inclusion of certain projects The Secretary of each military department shall include in military installation resilience plans under this section projects or improvements to facilities conducted using amounts for sustainment, restoration, and modernization. (f) Definitions In this section: (1) The term community infrastructure (2) The term Indian tribe 25 U.S.C. 5304 . 2815a. Military installation resilience projects (a) Projects required The Secretary of Defense shall carry out military construction projects for military installation resilience, not previously authorized, using funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for that purpose. (b) Congressional notification (1) When a decision is made to carry out a project under this section, the Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees of that decision. (2) The Secretary of Defense shall include in each notification submitted under paragraph (1) the rationale for how the project would— (A) enhance military installation resilience; (B) enhance mission assurance; (C) support mission critical functions; and (D) address known vulnerabilities. (c) Timing of projects A project may be carried out under this section only after the end of the 14-day period beginning on the date that notification with respect to that project under subsection (b) is received by the congressional defense committees in an electronic medium pursuant to section 480 of this title. (d) Annual report Not later than 90 days after the end of each fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of the planned and active projects carried out under this section (including completed projects), and shall include in the report with respect to each such project the following information: (1) The title, location, a brief description of the scope of work, the original project cost estimate, and the current working cost estimate. (2) The rationale for how the project would— (A) enhance military installation resilience; (B) enhance mission assurance; (C) support mission critical functions; and (D) address known vulnerabilities. (3) Such other information as the Secretary considers appropriate. (e) Authorization of appropriations There is authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense to carry out this section $100,000,000 for each fiscal year. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 169 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2814 the following new items: 2815. Military installation resilience plans. 2815a. Military installation resilience projects. . (b) Report (1) In general Not later than March 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the extent to which military installation resilience plans were prepared or implemented in accordance with section 2815 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(1). (2) Elements The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) The number of military installation resilience plans in effect, including the date on which each plan was issued in final form or most recently revised. (B) The amounts expended on mitigation measures conducted pursuant to or consistent with such plans, including moving critical military functions of the Department of Defense to less vulnerable military installations. (C) An assessment of the extent to which such plans comply with section 2815 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(1). 2802. Prohibition on use of funds to reduce air base resiliency or demolish protected aircraft shelters in the European theater without creating a similar protection from attack No funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 may be obligated or expended to implement any activity that reduces air base resiliency or demolishes protected aircraft shelters in the European theater without creating a similar protection from attack in the European theater until such time as the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that protected aircraft shelters are not required in the European theater. 2803. Prohibition on use of funds to close or return to the host nation any existing air base No funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 may be obligated or expended to implement any activity that closes or returns to the host nation any existing air base until such time as the Secretary of Defense certifies that there is no longer a need for a rotational military presence in the European theater. 2804. Increased authority for certain unspecified minor military construction projects (a) In general Notwithstanding the limitations specified in section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary concerned may carry out unspecified minor military construction projects in an amount not to exceed $12,000,000 at the following installations: (1) Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida. (2) Camp Ashland, Nebraska. (3) Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska. (4) Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. (5) Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina. (b) Adjustment of limitation The Secretary concerned may adjust the dollar limitation specified in subsection (a) applicable to a project described in such subsection to reflect the area construction cost index for military construction projects published by the Department of Defense during the prior fiscal year for the location of the project, except that no such limitation may exceed $19,000,000 as the result of any adjustment made under this subsection. (c) Termination The authority under this section shall terminate on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 2805. Technical corrections and improvements to installation resilience (a) Defense access roads Section 210 of title 23, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking (a)(1) The Secretary (a) Authorization (1) In general Of the funds appropriated for defense access roads, the Secretary may use such amounts as are appropriate for— (A) the construction and maintenance of defense access roads (including bridges, tubes, tunnels, and culverts or other water management structures on those roads) to— (i) military reservations; (ii) defense industry sites; (iii) air or sea ports that, as determined by the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, are necessary for or are planned to be used for the deployment or sustainment of members of the Armed Forces, equipment, or supplies; or (iv) sources of raw materials; (B) the reconstruction or enhancement of, or improvements to, those roads to ensure the continued effective use of the roads, regardless of current or projected increases in mean high tides, recurrent flooding, or other weather-related conditions or natural disasters, in any case in which the roads are certified to the Secretary as important to the national defense by— (i) the Secretary of Defense; or (ii) such other official as the President may designate; and (C) replacing existing highways and highway connections that are shut off from general public use by necessary closures, closures due to mean sea level fluctuation and flooding, or restrictions at— (i) military reservations; (ii) air or sea ports that are necessary for or are planned to be used for the deployment or sustainment of members of the Armed Forces, equipment, or supplies; or (iii) defense industry sites. ; (2) in subsection (b), by striking the construction and maintenance of the construction, maintenance, reconstruction, or improvement of, or enhancements to, (3) in subsection (c)— (A) by striking him the Secretary (B) by striking construction, maintenance, and repair work activities for construction, maintenance, reconstruction, enhancement, improvement, and repair (C) by striking therein in those areas (D) by striking condition for such training purposes and for repairing the damage caused to such highways by the operations condition for— (1) that training; and (2) repairing the damage to those highways caused by— (A) weather-related events, increases in mean high tide levels, recurrent flooding, or natural disasters; or (B) the operations ; (4) in subsection (g), in the second sentence, by striking construction which has been construction and other activities (5) by striking subsection (i) and inserting the following: (i) Repair of certain damages and infrastructure The amounts made available to carry out this section may be used to pay the cost of repairing damage caused, or any infrastructure to mitigate a risk posed, to a defense access road by recurrent or projected recurrent flooding, sea level fluctuation, a natural disaster, or any other current or projected change in applicable environmental conditions, if the Secretary determines that continued access to a military installation, defense industry site, air or sea port necessary for or planned to be used for the deployment or sustainment of members of the Armed Forces, equipment, or supplies, or to a source of raw materials, has been or is projected to be impacted by those events or conditions. . (b) Study on certain threats to military installation resilience (1) Study (A) In general Not later than March 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall complete a comprehensive study, to be conducted by the Director of the Engineer Research and Development Center of the Army Corps of Engineers, on the risks posed by coastal or inland flooding, mean sea level fluctuation, and storm surge to the military installation resilience of military installations and State-owned installations of the National Guard that the Secretary determines are vulnerable to those risks. (B) Coordination The study under subparagraph (A) shall be conducted in coordination with other elements of the Army Corps of Engineers, other Federal agencies, and State, local, and tribal officials to ensure consistency with other plans or pre-disaster and risk mitigation measures being planned or taken in the areas within the scope of the study. (2) Risk mitigation measures The study required by paragraph (1)(A) shall include the identification of and recommendations concerning ongoing or potential risk mitigation measures, including on lands and waters not under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense, including authorized projects of the Army Corps of Engineers and current or potential projects under the Continuing Authorities Program of the Corps of Engineers, that would contribute to preserving or enhancing the military installation resilience of military installations and State-owned installations of the National Guard within the scope of the study. (3) Barriers to maintaining and enhancing resilience The study required by paragraph (1)(A) shall identify institutional, administrative, legislative, and other barriers to preserving and enhancing the military installation resilience of the installations determined by such study to be vulnerable to the risks posed by coastal or inland flooding, sea level rise, or storm surge. (4) Reports (A) Initial report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report providing the status of, interim results for, and an expected completion date for the study required by paragraph (1)(A). (B) Final report Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a final report on the study required by paragraph (1)(A). (5) Definitions In this subsection: (A) Congressional defense committees; military installation resilience The terms congressional defense committees military installation resilience (B) Continuing Authorities Program of the Corps of Engineers The term Continuing Authorities Program of the Corps of Engineers 33 U.S.C. 400 (c) Update of United Facilities Criteria to include changing environmental condition projections Section 2805(c) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 (1) by striking Not later than (1) Fiscal year 2019 Not later than ; (2) in paragraph (1), as designated by paragraph (1), by striking United Facilities Criteria (UFC) 2-100-01 and UFC 2-100-02 United Facilities Criteria (UFC) 1-200-01 and UFC 1-200-02 (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) Fiscal year 2020 Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall amend the United Facilities Criteria (UFC) as follows: (A) To require that installations of the Department of Defense assess the risks from extreme weather and related effects and develop plans to address those risks. (B) To require in the design of any military construction project the use of the following weather projections: (i) Population projections from the Bureau of the Census. (ii) Land use change projections and weather projections from the National Academy of Sciences. (iii) Land use change projections through the use of land use and land cover modeling by the United States Geological Survey. (iv) Weather projections from the United States Global Change Research Program, including in the National Climate Assessment. (v) Weather projections developed through the use of Localized Constructed Analogs Statistical Downscaling. (vi) Weather projections developed through the Earth Exchange program of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (vii) Weather projections included in the technical report NOS CO-OPS 083 set forth by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (viii) Any customized, high-resolution model weather projections developed by the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program for specific regions with the goal of assessing the vulnerability of installations of the Department. (C) To require the Secretary to provide guidance to project designers and master planners on how to use weather projections. (D) To require the use throughout the Department of the Naval Facilities Engineering Command Climate Change Installation Adaptation and Resilience planning handbook. . B Land Conveyances 2811. Release of interests retained in Camp Joseph T. Robinson, Arkansas, for use of such land as a veterans cemetery (a) Release of retained interests (1) In general With respect to a parcel of land at Camp Joseph T. Robinson, Arkansas, consisting of approximately 141.52 acres that lies in a part of section 35, township 3 north, range 12 west, Pulaski County, Arkansas, and comprising a portion of the property conveyed by the United States to the State of Arkansas for training of the National Guard and for other military purposes pursuant to An Act authorizing the transfer of part of Camp Joseph T. Robinson to the State of Arkansas (2) Impact on other rights or interests The release of terms and conditions and retained interests under paragraph (1) with respect to the parcel described in such paragraph shall not be construed to alter the rights or interests retained by the United States with respect to the remainder of the real property conveyed to the State of Arkansas under the Act described in such paragraph. (b) Instrument of release and description of property (1) In general The Secretary of the Army may execute and file in the appropriate office a deed of release, amended deed, or other appropriate instrument reflecting the release of terms and conditions and retained interests under subsection (a). (2) Legal description The exact acreage and legal description of the property described in subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army. (c) Conditions on release and reversionary interest (1) Expansion of veterans cemetery and reversionary interest (A) Expansion of veterans cemetery The State of Arkansas may use the parcel of land described in subsection (a)(1) only for the expansion of the Arkansas State Veterans Cemetery. (B) Reversionary interest If the Secretary of the Army determines at any time that the parcel of land described in subsection (a)(1) is not being used in accordance with the purpose specified in subparagraph (A), all right, title, and interest in and to the land, including any improvements thereto, shall, at the option of the Secretary, revert to and become the property of the United States, and the United States shall have the right of immediate entry onto such parcel. (2) Additional terms and conditions The Secretary of the Army may require in the instrument of release such additional terms and conditions in connection with the release of terms and conditions and retained interests under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. (d) Payment of administrative costs (1) Payment required (A) In general The Secretary of the Army may require the State of Arkansas to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the release of terms and conditions and retained interests under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs related to environmental documentation, and other administrative costs related to the release. (B) Refund of amounts If amounts paid to the Secretary by the State of Arkansas in advance under subparagraph (A) exceed the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the release, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the State. (2) Treatment of amounts received Amounts received under paragraph (1) as reimbursement for costs incurred by the Secretary to carry out the release of terms and conditions and retained interests under subsection (a) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the release. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account. 2812. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction over certain parcels of Federal land in Arlington, Virginia (a) Transfer to the secretary of the army (1) Transfer Administrative jurisdiction over the parcel of Federal land described in paragraph (2) is transferred from the Secretary of the Interior to the Secretary of the Army. (2) Description of land The parcel of Federal land referred to in paragraph (1) is the approximately 16.09-acre parcel of land in Arlington, Virginia, as depicted on the map entitled Arlington National Cemetery, Memorial Ave–NPS Parcel (b) Transfer to the secretary of the interior (1) Transfer Administrative jurisdiction over the parcel of Federal land described in paragraph (2) is transferred from the Secretary of the Army to the Secretary of the Interior. (2) Description of land The parcel of Federal land referred to in paragraph (1) is the approximately 1.04-acre parcel of land in Arlington, Virginia, as depicted on the map entitled Arlington National Cemetery–Chaffee NPS Land Swap (c) Land surveys The exact acreage and legal description of a parcel of Federal land described in subsection (a)(2) or (b)(2) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Interior. (d) Authority to correct errors The Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Interior may correct any clerical or typographical error in a map described in subsection (a)(2) or (b)(2). (e) Terms and conditions (1) No reimbursement or consideration A transfer by subsection (a)(1) or (b)(1) shall be without reimbursement or consideration. (2) Continued recreational access The use of a bicycle trail or recreational access within a parcel of Federal land described in subsection (a)(2) or (b)(2) in which the use or access is authorized before the date of enactment of this Act shall be allowed to continue after the transfer of the applicable parcel of Federal land by subsection (a)(1) or (b)(1). (3) Management of parcel transferred to secretary of the army The parcel of Federal land transferred to the Secretary of the Army by section (a)(1) shall be administered by the Secretary of the Army— (A) as part of Arlington National Cemetery; and (B) in accordance with applicable law, including— (i) regulations; and (ii) section 2409 of title 38, United States Code. (4) Management of parcel transferred to secretary of the interior The parcel of Federal land transferred to the Secretary of the Interior by subsection (b)(1) shall be— (A) included within the boundary of Arlington House, The Robert E. Lee Memorial; and (B) administered by the Secretary of the Interior— (i) as part of the memorial referred to in subparagraph (A); and (ii) in accordance with applicable law (including regulations). 2813. Modification of requirements relating to land acquisition in Arlington County, Virginia Section 2829A of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–328 (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in paragraph (2)— (i) in subparagraph (A)— (I) by striking to remove if existing County utilities in the Southgate Road right of way are permitted to remain in accordance with a mutually agreed upon utility easement, to remove (II) by striking through a realignment (i) a realignment ; (III) in clause (i), as designated by subclause (I), by striking and or (IV) by adding at the end the following new clause: (ii) the replacement of Southgate Road with a new access road to Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall; and ; and (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end and inserting in accordance with this section and applicable Federal, Commonwealth, and County road right of way engineering standards and requirements. (B) by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows: (3) Consideration (A) In general The Secretary shall expend amounts up to fair market value consideration for the interests in land acquired under this subsection as such value is determined by an independent appraisal process in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 ( 42 U.S.C. 4601 (B) In-Kind consideration (i) In general Any substitute or replacement facilities provided as in-kind consideration to replace existing Commonwealth or County roadways under this subsection shall— (I) be conveyed in fee simple absolute with no encumbrances or restrictions unless otherwise agreed by the Commonwealth or the County; (II) comply with applicable Commonwealth or County road right of way engineering standards and requirements; and (III) with respect to any substitute facility provided for the realignment of Columbia Pike— (aa) include a right-of-way profile (including constructed roadway, sidewalks, bicycle trails, multi-use trails, buffers, etc.) of not less than 92 feet in width; and (bb) ensure that, if a vehicle or equipment tunnel under Columbia Pike is determined by the Secretary to be necessary, there is a depth of not less than 10 feet between the top of the tunnel and the surface of the roadway. (ii) Difference in fair market value The Commonwealth and the County shall be entitled to monetary compensation in an amount equal to the difference in the fair market value of any property acquired under this subsection and any property provided as in-kind consideration under this subparagraph for such acquired property, which shall be appraised— (I) as if such properties were to be made available as surplus; and (II) as determined by an independent appraisal process in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 ( 42 U.S.C. 4601 ; (2) in subsection (c), by striking appraisals acceptable to the Secretary an independent appraisal process in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 ( 42 U.S.C. 4601 (3) in subsection (d), by striking , in consultation with the Commonwealth and the County where practicable the Commonwealth, and the County 2814. White Sands Missile Range Land Enhancements (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Map The term Map White Sands National Park Proposed Boundary Revision & Transfer of Lands Between National Park Service & Department of the Army (2) Military munitions The term military munitions (3) Missile range The term missile range (4) Monument The term Monument 54 U.S.C. 320301 (5) Munitions debris The term munitions debris DoD Ammunitions and Explosives Safety Standards (6) Park The term Park (7) Public Land Order The term Public Land Order (8) Secretary The term Secretary (9) State The term State (b) White Sands National Park (1) Findings Congress finds that— (A) White Sands National Monument was established on January 18, 1933, by President Herbert Hoover under chapter 3203 Antiquities Act of 1906 (B) President Hoover proclaimed that the Monument was established for the preservation of the white sands and additional features of scenic, scientific, and educational interest (C) the Monument was expanded by Presidents Roosevelt, Eisenhower, Carter, and Clinton in 1934, 1942, 1953, 1978, and 1996, respectively; (D) the Monument contains a substantially more diverse set of nationally significant historical, archaeological, scientific, and natural resources than were known of at the time the Monument was established, including a number of recent discoveries; (E) the Monument is recognized as a major unit of the National Park System with extraordinary values enjoyed by more visitors each year since 1995 than any other unit in the State; (F) the Monument contributes significantly to the local economy by attracting tourists; and (G) designation of the Monument as a national park would increase public recognition of the diverse array of nationally significant resources at the Monument and visitation to the unit. (2) Establishment of White Sands National Park (A) Establishment To protect, preserve, and restore its scenic, scientific, educational, natural, geological, historical, cultural, archaeological, paleontological, hydrological, fish, wildlife, and recreational values and to enhance visitor experiences, there is established in the State the White Sands National Park as a unit of the National Park System. (B) Abolishment of White Sands National Monument (i) Abolishment Due to the establishment of the Park, the Monument is abolished. (ii) Incorporation The land and interests in land that comprise the Monument are incorporated in, and shall be considered to be part of, the Park. (C) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the White Sands National Monument White Sands National Park (D) Availability of Funds Any funds available for the Monument shall be available for the Park. (E) Administration The Secretary shall administer the Park in accordance with— (i) this subsection; and (ii) the laws generally applicable to units of the National Park System, including section 100101(a), chapter 1003, sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101, and chapter 3201 (F) World Heritage List nomination (i) County concurrence The Secretary shall not submit a nomination for the Park to be included on the World Heritage List of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization unless each county in which the Park is located concurs in the nomination. (ii) Army notification Before submitting a nomination for the Park to be included on the World Heritage List of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, the Secretary shall notify the Secretary of the Army of the intent of the Secretary to nominate the Park. (G) Effect Nothing in this paragraph affects— (i) valid existing rights (including water rights); (ii) permits or contracts issued by the Monument; (iii) existing agreements, including agreements with the Department of Defense; (iv) the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense regarding the restricted airspace above the Park; or (v) the airshed classification of the Park under the Clean Air Act 42 U.S.C. 7401 (c) Modification of boundaries of White Sands National Park and White Sands Missile Range (1) Transfers of administrative jurisdiction (A) Transfer of administrative jurisdiction to the Secretary (i) In general Administrative jurisdiction over the land described in clause (ii) is transferred from the Secretary of the Army to the Secretary. (ii) Description of land The land referred to in clause (i) is— (I) the approximately 2,826 acres of land identified as To NPS, lands inside current boundary (II) the approximately 5,766 acres of land identified as To NPS, new additions (B) Transfer of administrative jurisdiction to the Secretary of the Army (i) In general Administrative jurisdiction over the land described in clause (ii) is transferred from the Secretary to the Secretary of the Army. (ii) Description of land The land referred to in clause (i) is the approximately 3,737 acres of land identified as To DOA (2) Boundary modifications (A) Park (i) In general The boundary of the Park is revised to reflect the boundary depicted on the Map. (ii) Map (I) In general The Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of the Army, shall prepare and keep on file for public inspection in the appropriate office of the Secretary a map and a legal description of the revised boundary of the Park. (II) Effect The map and legal description under subclause (I) shall have the same force and effect as if included in this section, except that the Secretary may correct clerical and typographical errors in the map and legal description. (iii) Boundary survey As soon as practicable after the date of the establishment of the Park and subject to the availability of funds, the Secretary shall complete an official boundary survey of the Park. (B) Missile range (i) In general The boundary of the missile range and the Public Land Order are modified to exclude the land transferred to the Secretary under paragraph (1)(A) and to include the land transferred to the Secretary of the Army under paragraph (1)(B). (ii) Map The Secretary shall prepare a map and legal description depicting the revised boundary of the missile range. (C) Conforming amendment Section 2854 of Public Law 104–201 54 U.S.C. 320301 (3) Administration (A) Park The Secretary shall administer the land transferred under paragraph (1)(A) in accordance with laws (including regulations) applicable to the Park. (B) Missile range Subject to subparagraph (C), the Secretary of the Army shall administer the land transferred to the Secretary of the Army under paragraph (1)(B) as part of the missile range. (C) Infrastructure; resource management (i) Range Road 7 (I) Infrastructure management To the maximum extent practicable, in planning, constructing, and managing infrastructure on the land described in subclause (III), the Secretary of the Army shall apply low-impact development techniques and strategies to prevent impacts within the missile range and the Park from stormwater runoff from the land described in that subclause. (II) Resource management The Secretary of the Army shall— (aa) manage the land described in subclause (III) in a manner consistent with the protection of natural and cultural resources within the missile range and the Park and in accordance with section 101(a)(1)(B) of the Sikes Act ( 16 U.S.C. 670a(a)(1)(B) 25 U.S.C. 3001 (bb) include the land described in subclause (III) in the integrated natural and cultural resource management plan for the missile range. (III) Description of land The land referred to in subclauses (I) and (II) is the land that is transferred to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Army under paragraph (1)(B) and located in the area east of Range Road 7 in— (aa) T. 17 S., R. 5 E., sec. 31; (bb) T. 18 S., R. 5 E.; and (cc) T. 19 S., R. 5 E., sec. 5. (ii) Fence (I) In general The Secretary of the Army shall continue to allow the Secretary to maintain the fence shown on the Map until such time as the Secretary determines that the fence is unnecessary for the management of the Park. (II) Removal If the Secretary determines that the fence is unnecessary for the management of the Park under subclause (I), the Secretary shall promptly remove the fence at the expense of the Department of the Interior. (D) Research The Secretary of the Army and the Secretary may enter into an agreement to allow the Secretary to conduct certain research in the area identified as Cooperative Use Research Area (E) Military munitions and munitions debris (i) Response action With respect to any Federal liability, the Secretary of the Army shall remain responsible for any response action addressing military munitions or munitions debris on the land transferred under paragraph (1)(A) to the same extent as on the day before the date of enactment of this Act. (ii) Investigation of military munitions and munitions debris (I) In general The Secretary may request that the Secretary of the Army conduct 1 or more investigations of military munitions or munitions debris on any land transferred under paragraph (1)(A). (II) Access The Secretary shall give access to the Secretary of the Army to the land covered by a request under subclause (I) for the purposes of conducting the 1 or more investigations under that subclause. (III) Limitation An investigation conducted under this clause shall be subject to available appropriations. (iii) Applicable law Any activities undertaken under this subparagraph shall be carried out in accordance with— (I) the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 ( 42 U.S.C. 9601 (II) the purposes for which the Park was established; and (III) any other applicable law. C Other Matters 2821. Equal treatment of insured depository institutions and credit unions operating on military installations Section 2667 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: (l) Treatment of insured depository institutions (1) Each covered insured depository institution operating on a military installation within the continental United States may be allotted space or leased land on the military installation without charge for rent or services in the same manner as a credit union organized under State law or a Federal credit union under section 124 of the Federal Credit Union Act ( 12 U.S.C. 1770 (2) Each covered insured depository institution, credit union organized under State law, and Federal credit union operating on a military installation within the continental United States shall be treated equally with respect to policies of the Department of Defense governing the financial terms of leases, logistical support, services, and utilities. (3) The Secretary concerned shall not be required to provide no-cost office space or a no-cost land lease to any covered insured depository institution, credit union organized under State law, or Federal credit union. (4) In this subsection: (A) The term covered insured depository institution 12 U.S.C. 1770 (B) The term Federal credit union 12 U.S.C. 1752 (C) The term insured depository institution 12 U.S.C. 1813 . 2822. Expansion of temporary authority for acceptance and use of contributions for certain construction, maintenance, and repair projects mutually beneficial to the Department of Defense and Kuwait military forces (a) Expansion Section 2804 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( 10 U.S.C. 2350j (1) in subsection (a)— (A) by striking government of Kuwait Government of Kuwait and the Government of the Republic of Korea (B) by striking Kuwait military forces the military forces of the applicable contributing country (2) in subsection (b), by inserting for contributions from the contributing country Secretary of Defense (3) in subsection (c), by striking government of Kuwait government of the contributing country (4) in subsection (e)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking government of Kuwait government of the contributing country (B) in paragraph (2)— (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking Kuwait military forces military forces of the contributing country (ii) in subparagraph (C), by striking Kuwait military forces the military forces of the contributing country (b) Conforming amendment The heading of such section is amended to read as follows: 2804. Temporary authority for acceptance and use of contributions for certain construction, maintenance, and repair projects mutually beneficial to the Department of Defense and the military forces of Kuwait and the Republic of Korea . 2823. Designation of Sumpter Smith Joint National Guard Base (a) Designation The Sumpter Smith Air National Guard Base in Birmingham, Alabama, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known and designated as the Sumpter Smith Joint National Guard Base (b) Reference Any reference in any law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the installation referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference to the Sumpter Smith Joint National Guard Base. 2824. Prohibition on use of funds to privatize temporary lodging on installations of Department of Defense No funds may be authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 to privatize temporary lodging on installations of the Department. 2825. Pilot program to extend service life of roads and runways under the jurisdiction of the Secretaries of the military departments (a) Pilot program authorized Each Secretary of a military department may carry out a pilot program to design, build, and test technologies and innovative pavement materials in order to extend the service life of roads and runways under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned. (b) Scope A pilot program under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) The design, testing, and assembly of technologies and systems suitable for pavement applications. (2) Research, development, and testing of new pavement materials for use in different geographic areas in the United States. (3) The design and procurement of platforms and equipment to test the performance, cost, feasibility, and effectiveness of the technologies, systems, and materials described in paragraphs (1) and (2). (c) Award of contracts or grants (1) In general Each Secretary of a military department may carry out a pilot program under subsection (a) through the award of contracts or grants for the designing, building, or testing of technologies or innovative pavement materials under the pilot program. (2) Merit-based selection Any award of a contract or grant under a pilot program under subsection (a) shall be made using merit-based selection procedures. (d) Report (1) In general Not later than two years after the commencement of a pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary of the military department concerned shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program. (2) Contents Each report under paragraph (1) with respect to a pilot program shall include the following: (A) An assessment of the effectiveness of activities under the pilot program in improving the service life of roads and runways under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned. (B) An analysis of the potential lifetime cost savings and reduction in energy demands associated with the extended service life of such roads and runways. (e) Termination of authority Each pilot program under subsection (a) shall terminate on September 30, 2024. XXIX Overseas contingency operations military construction 2901. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects The Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out the military construction projects for the installations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Army: Outside the United States Country Location Amount Cuba Guantanamo Bay $33,800,000 Worldwide Unspecified Unspecified Worldwide Locations $42,200,000 2902. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects The Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out the military construction projects for the installations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Navy: Outside the United States Country Location Amount Spain Rota $69,570,000 2903. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects The Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out the military construction projects for the installations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Air Force: Outside the United States Country Location Amount Iceland Keflavik $57,000,000 Spain Moron $8,500,000 Worldwide Unspecified Unspecified Worldwide Locations $175,000,000 2904. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects The Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out the military construction projects for the installations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Defense Agencies: Outside the United States Country Location Amount Germany Gemersheim $46,000,000 2905. Disaster recovery projects (a) Navy The Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects inside the United States relating to disaster recovery for the locations, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Navy: Inside the United States State Location Amount North Carolina Camp Lejeune $861,587,000 Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point $64,561,000 Unspecified Zulu $50,000,000 (b) Air Force The Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects inside the United States relating to disaster recovery for the locations, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Air Force: Inside the United States State Location Amount Florida Tyndall Air Force Base $1,278,700,000 Unspecified Zulu $247,000,000 (c) Army National Guard The Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects inside the United States relating to disaster recovery for the locations, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Army National Guard: Inside the United States State Location Amount Florida Panama City $25,000,000 North Carolina MTA Fort Fisher $25,000,000 (d) Defense-wide The Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects inside the United States relating to disaster recovery for the locations, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Defense-wide: Inside the United States State Location Amount North Carolina Camp Lejeune—Defense Health Agency $45,313,000 Camp Lejeune—SOCOM $30,000,000 2906. Replenishment of certain military constructions funds (a) In general Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 by section 2905 and available as specified in the funding table in section 4602, $3,600,000,000 shall be available for replenishment of funds that were authorized to be appropriated by military construction authorization Acts for fiscal years before fiscal year 2020 for military construction projects authorized by such Acts, but were used instead for military construction projects authorized by section 2808 of title 10, United States Code, in connection with the national emergency along the southern land border of the United States declared in 2019 pursuant to the National Emergencies Act ( 50 U.S.C. 1601 (b) Replenishment by transfer (1) In general Any amounts available under subsection (a) that are used for replenishment of funds as described in that subsection shall be transferred to the account that was the source of such funds. (2) Inapplicability toward transfer limitations Any transfer of amounts under this subsection shall not count toward any limitation on transfer of Department of Defense funds in section 1001 or 1512 or any other limitation on transfer of Department of funds in law. (3) Sunset of authority The authority to make transfers under this subsection shall terminate on September 30, 2020. (c) Use of funds (1) In general Amounts transferred under subsection (b) for replenishment of funds as described in subsection (a) may be used only for military construction projects for which such funds were originally authorized in a military construction authorization Act described in subsection (a). (2) No increase in authorized amount of projects The total amount of funds available for a military construction project described in paragraph (1) may not exceed the current amount authorized for such project by applicable military construction authorization Acts (including this Act). A replenishment of funds under this section for a military construction project shall not operate to increase the authorized amount of the project or the amount authorized to be available for the project. 2907. Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2019, for the military construction projects outside the United States authorized by this title as specified in the funding table in section 4602. XXX Military housing privatization reform 3001. Definitions (a) In general In this title: (1) Landlord The term landlord (2) Privatized military housing The term privatized military housing chapter 169 (b) Title 10 Section 2871 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraphs (7) and (8) as paragraphs (9) and (11), respectively; (2) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following new paragraphs: (7) The term incentive fees (8) The term landlord ; and (3) by inserting after paragraph (9), as redesignated by paragraph (1) of this subsection, the following new paragraph: (10) The term tenant . A Accountability and Oversight 3011. Tenant bill of rights for privatized military housing (a) In general Subchapter IV of chapter 169 2887. Tenant Bill of Rights (a) In general (1) The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of each military department, shall develop a document known as the Tenant Bill of Rights (2) At a minimum, the document developed under paragraph (1) shall contain the right of each tenant as follows: (A) To reside in a home and community that meets health and environmental standards established by the Secretary of Defense. (B) To reside in a home that has working fixtures, appliances, and utilities and reside in a community with well-maintained common areas and amenity spaces. (C) To report inadequate housing standards or deficits in habitability to the landlord, chain of command, and housing management office without fear of reprisal. (D) With respect to the housing management office of the installation of the Department at which the housing unit is located— (i) to use such office as an advocate relating to such housing unit; and (ii) to receive advice and support from such office relating to such housing unit. (E) To receive property management services provided by a landlord that meet or exceed industry standards and that are performed by professionally trained, responsive, and courteous customer service and maintenance staff. (F) To have multiple, convenient methods to communicate directly with the landlord and maintenance staff, and to receive honest, straightforward, and responsive communications at all times. (G) With respect to repairs— (i) to prompt and professional repairs; (ii) to be informed of the required time frame for those repairs when a maintenance request is submitted; and (iii) to prompt relocation into suitable lodging or other housing at no cost to the tenant until the repairs are completed or relocation to an alternative residence on the installation or within the surrounding local community at no cost to the tenant. (H) To enter into a dispute resolution process under section 2891 of this title concerning disputes over repairs, damage claims, and rental payments to be resolved by a neutral decision maker, with any decision in favor of the tenant to include a reduction in rent owed to the landlord to be paid or credited to the tenant. (I) To withhold basic allowance for housing (including for any dependents of the tenant in the tenant’s household) under section 403 of title 37, or any pay of the tenant subject to allotment described in section 2882(c) of this title, if the tenant is engaged in a dispute under subparagraph (H) until a decision in the matter is made. (J) To be fully briefed by the landlord on all rights and responsibilities associated with tenancy prior to signing a lease and receive a 30-day followup to review these responsibilities. (K) To have sufficient time and opportunity to prepare and be present for move-in and move-out inspections, including an opportunity to obtain necessary paperwork. (L) To have reasonable, advance notice of any entrance by a landlord into the housing unit, except in the case of an emergency. (M) To have clearly defined rental terms in the lease agreement. (N) To not pay non-refundable fees or have application of rent credits arbitrarily held. (O) To have universal procedures for housing under this subchapter that are the same for all installations of the Department. (P) To file claims against a landlord. (3) The document developed under paragraph (1) shall contain the responsibilities of each tenant as follows: (A) To report maintenance or quality of life issues to the landlord in a timely manner. (B) To maintain standard upkeep of the housing unit as recommended by the housing management office. (b) Distribution The Secretary shall ensure that the Tenant Bill of Rights under this section is attached to each lease agreement for housing under this subchapter. (c) Report and publication (1) Beginning in fiscal year 2021, and biennially thereafter, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of each military department, shall submit to the congressional defense committees, as part of the annual budget submission of the President for that year under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the Tenant Bill of Rights under this section. (2) Upon submitting the Tenant Bill of Rights to the congressional defense committees under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall publish the Tenant Bill of Rights on a publicly available Internet website of the Department of Defense. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2886 the following new item: 2887. Tenant Bill of Rights. . (c) Military department plans Not later than February 1, 2020, the Secretary of each military department shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for the implementation by that military department of section 2887 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a). 3012. Designation of Chief Housing Officer for privatized military housing (a) In general Subchapter IV of chapter 169 section 2872a 2872b. Chief Housing Officer (a) In general (1) The Secretary of Defense shall designate, from among officials of the Department of Defense who are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, a Chief Housing Officer who shall oversee housing provided under this subchapter. (2) The official designated under paragraph (1) may have duties in addition to the duties of the Chief Housing Officer under this section. (b) Duties The Chief Housing Officer shall oversee all aspects of the provision of housing under this subchapter, including by carrying out the following: (1) Creation and standardization of policies and processes. (2) Oversight of the administration of lease agreements by the Secretary of each military department. (3) Audits of the provision of housing under this subchapter, including audits of lease agreements and other contracts, maintenance work orders, and incentive fee payments and general audits in the conduct of oversight. (c) Office and staff (1) The Chief Housing Officer shall establish and maintain an office staffed by military personnel and employees of the Department of Defense whose skills and capabilities will assist the Chief Housing Officer in the exercise of the duties of the Chief Housing Officer under subsection (b). Such office shall be known as the Office of the Chief Housing Officer (2) Personnel and employees staffed under paragraph (1) shall include legal counsel, engineers, and auditors. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2872a the following new item: 2872b. Chief Housing Officer. . (c) Report Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on— (1) the designation of a Chief Housing Officer under section 2872b of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a); and (2) the organizational structure, funding, human resources, and other relevant requirements of the Office of the Chief Housing Officer under such section. 3013. Command oversight of military privatized housing as element of performance evaluations (a) Evaluations in general Each Secretary of a military department shall ensure that the performance evaluations of any individual described in subsection (b) under the jurisdiction of such Secretary indicates the extent to which such individual has or has not exercised effective oversight and leadership in the following: (1) Improving conditions of privatized housing under the military privatized housing initiative under subchapter IV of chapter 169, United States Code. (2) Addressing concerns with respect to such housing of members of the Armed Forces and their families who reside in such housing on an installation of the military department concerned. (b) Covered individuals The individuals described in this subsection are as follows: (1) The commander of an installation of a military department at which on-installation housing is managed by a landlord under the military privatized housing initiative referred to in subsection (a)(1). (2) Each officer or senior enlisted member of the Armed Forces at an installation described in paragraph (1) whose duties include facilities or housing management at such installation. (3) Any other officer or enlisted member of the Armed Forces (whether or not at an installation described in paragraph (1)) as specified by the Secretary of the military department concerned for purposes of this section. 3014. Consideration of history of landlord in contract renewal process for privatized military housing (a) In general Subchapter IV of chapter 169 section 2874 2874a. Consideration of history of landlord in contract renewal process (a) In general In deciding whether to enter into or renew a contract with a landlord under this subchapter, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a standard process for determining past performance for purposes of informing future decisions regarding the award of such a contract. (b) Elements of process The process developed under subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, consideration of the following: (1) Any history of the landlord of providing substandard housing. (2) The recommendation of the commander of the installation at which the housing is to be located under the contract. (3) The recommendation of the commander of any installation at which the landlord has provided housing under this subchapter. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2874 the following new item: 2874a. Consideration of history of landlord in contract renewal process. . 3015. Treatment of breach of contract for privatized military housing (a) In general Subchapter IV of chapter 169 section 2874a 2874b. Treatment of breach of contract Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Defense— (1) shall withhold amounts to be paid under a contract under this subchapter if the other party to the contract is found to have engaged in a material breach of the contract; (2) shall rescind a contract under this subchapter if the other party to the contract, based on credible evidence, fails to cure such breach within 90 days; and (3) shall not permit the other party to a contract rescinded under paragraph (2) to enter into new contracts with the Secretary under this subchapter or undertake expansions under existing contracts with the Secretary under this subchapter. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2874a the following new item: 2874b. Treatment of breach of contract. . 3016. Uniform code of basic standards for privatized military housing and plan to conduct inspections and assessments (a) Uniform code The Secretary of Defense shall establish a uniform code of basic housing standards for safety, comfort, and habitability for privatized military housing. (b) Plan (1) In general Not later than February 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan of the Department of Defense to contract with home inspectors described in subsection (c) to conduct a thorough inspection and assessment of the structural integrity and habitability of each privatized military housing unit. (2) Inclusion of uniform code The plan submitted under paragraph (1) shall include the uniform code established under subsection (a). (3) Implementation (A) In general Not later than February 1, 2021, the Secretary of each military department shall conduct inspections and assessments of privatized military housing units under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned pursuant to the plan submitted under paragraph (1) to identify issues and ensure compliance with applicable housing codes, including the uniform code established under subsection (a). (B) Report Not later than March 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the findings of the inspections and assessments conducted under subparagraph (A). (c) Home inspectors described A home inspector described in this subsection is a home inspector that is not affiliated with— (1) the Federal Government; or (2) an individual or entity who owns or manages a privatized military housing unit. 3017. Repeal of supplemental payments to lessors and requirement for use of funds in connection with the Military Housing Privatization Initiative (a) Repeal (1) In general Section 606 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 10 U.S.C. 2871 (2) Effective date The amendment made by paragraph (1) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to months beginning on or after that date. (b) Use of funds in connection with MHPI (1) In general Each month beginning with the first month after the date of the enactment of this Act, each Secretary of a military department shall do the following: (A) Payments to lessors Use funds, in an amount calculated pursuant to paragraph (2)(A), for payments to lessors of covered housing in the manner provided by subsection (a) of section 606 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act. (B) Improvement of oversight and management of agreements Use funds, in an amount calculated pursuant to paragraph (2)(B), for improvements of the oversight and management of agreements for MHPI housing under the jurisdiction of such Secretary. (2) Monthly amounts (A) For payments to lessors The amount calculated for a military department for a month pursuant to this subparagraph is 2 percent of the aggregate of the amounts calculated under section 403(b)(3)(A)(i) of title 37, United States Code, for covered housing under the jurisdiction of such department for such month. (B) For improvement of oversight and management of agreements The amount calculated for a military department for a month pursuant to this subparagraph is 3 percent of the aggregate of the amounts calculated under section 403(b)(3)(A)(i) of title 37, United States Code, for covered housing under the jurisdiction of such department for such month. (3) Improvements Improvements under paragraph (1)(B) to the oversight and management of agreements described in that paragraph may include the following: (A) Assignment of additional civilian personnel to perform oversight and management functions with respect to such agreements. (B) Investment in technological mechanisms to assist the military department concerned in overseeing the maintenance and upkeep of MHPI housing. (C) Such additional investment in the oversight and management of such agreements, and in overseeing the maintenance and upkeep of MHPI housing, as the Secretary of the military department concerned considers appropriate. (4) Additional payments to lessors In any month described in paragraph (1), the Secretary of a military department may use amounts, in addition to amounts calculated pursuant to paragraph (2)(A), for payments to lessors as described in paragraph (1)(A) if such Secretary provides advance notice of such payments to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives. (5) Definitions In this subsection, the terms covered housing MHPI housing 3018. Standard for common credentials for health and environmental inspectors of privatized military housing (a) In general Not later than February 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that contains a standard for common credentials to be used throughout the Department of Defense for all inspectors of health and environmental hazards at privatized military housing units, including inspectors contracted by the Department. (b) Inclusion of categories for specific environmental hazards The standard submitted under subsection (a) shall include categories for specific environmental hazards such as lead, mold, and radon. 3019. Improvement of privatized military housing (a) Complaint database and financial transparency (1) In general Subchapter IV of chapter 169 2888. Complaint database (a) Database required The Secretary of Defense shall establish a database that is available to the public of complaints relating to housing units under this subchapter. (b) Filing of complaints The Secretary shall ensure that a tenant of a housing unit under this subchapter may file a complaint relating to such housing unit for inclusion in the database under subsection (a). (c) Response by landlord (1) The Secretary shall include in any contract with a landlord responsible for a housing unit under this subchapter a requirement that the landlord respond to any complaints included in the database under subsection (a) that relate to the housing unit. (2) Any response under paragraph (1) shall be included in the database under subsection (a). 2889. Financial transparency (a) Publication of details of contracts (1) Not less frequently than annually, the Secretary Defense shall publish in the Federal Register the financial details of each contract for the management of housing units under this subchapter. (2) The financial details published under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) Base management fees for managing the housing units. (B) Incentive fees relating to the housing units, including details on the following: (i) Metrics upon which such incentive fees are paid. (ii) Whether incentive fees were paid in full or withheld in part or in full during the year covered by the publication, and if so, why. (C) Asset management fees relating to the housing units. (D) Preferred return fees relating to the housing units. (E) Any deferred fees or other fees relating to the housing units. (F) Residual cash flow distributions relating to the housing units. (b) Annual financial statements (1) The Secretary of Defense shall require that each landlord submit to the Secretary, not less frequently than annually, financial statements equivalent to a 10-K (or successor form) for— (A) the landlord; and (B) each contract entered into between the landlord and the Department of Defense under this subchapter. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2887 the following new items: 2888. Complaint database. 2889. Financial transparency. . (b) Annual reports on privatized military housing and denied requests to withhold payments Section 2884 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections: (d) Annual report on housing (1) Not less frequently than annually, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees and publish on a publicly available website of the Department of Defense a report on housing units under this subchapter, disaggregated by military installation. (2) Each report submitted under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An assessment of the condition of housing units under this subchapter based on the average age of those units and the estimated time until recapitalization. (B) An analysis of complaints of tenants of such housing units. (C) An assessment of maintenance response times and completion of maintenance requests relating to such housing units. (D) An assessment of dispute resolution relating to such housing units. (E) An assessment of overall customer service for tenants of such housing units. (F) A description of the results of any no-notice housing inspections conducted for such housing units. (G) The results of any resident surveys conducted with respect to such housing units. (e) Report on denied requests to withhold payments Not less frequently than annually, the commander of each military installation shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on all requests that were made by members of the armed forces who are tenants of housing units under this subchapter to withhold from the landlord of such unit any basic allowance for housing payable to the member (including for any dependents of the member in the member's household) under section 403 of title 37, or any other allotment of pay under section 2882(c) of this title, and that were denied during the year covered by the report. . 3020. Access to maintenance work order system of landlords of privatized military housing (a) In general Subchapter IV of chapter 169 2890. Access to maintenance work order system The Secretary of Defense shall require each landlord that provides housing under this subchapter at an installation of the Department of Defense to provide access to the maintenance work order system of such landlord with respect to such housing to the following: (1) Personnel of the housing management office at such installation. (2) Personnel of the installation and engineer command or center of the military department concerned. (3) Such other personnel of the Department of Defense as the Secretary determines necessary. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2889 the following new item: 2890. Access to maintenance work order system. . 3021. Access by tenants of privatized military housing to work order system of landlord The Secretary of Defense shall require that each landlord for a privatized military housing unit— (1) have an electronic work order system for all work orders for maintenance requests relating to such unit; and (2) provide to a tenant of such unit access to such system to, at a minimum, track the status and progress of work orders for maintenance requests relating to such unit. B Prioritizing Families 3031. Dispute resolution process for landlord-tenant disputes regarding privatized military housing and requests to withhold payments (a) Dispute resolution and request to withhold payment (1) In general Subchapter IV of chapter 169 2891. Landlord-tenant dispute resolution process (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall implement a standardized formal dispute resolution process on each military installation with housing units under this subchapter to ensure the prompt and fair resolution of landlord-tenant disputes concerning maintenance and repairs, damage claims, rental payments, move-out charges, and such other issues relating to such housing units as the Secretary determines appropriate. (b) Dispute submittal (1) Each landlord shall establish a process through which a tenant of a housing unit under this subchapter may submit a dispute directly to the landlord through an online or other form. (2) Not later than 24 hours after receiving a dispute submittal from a tenant under paragraph (1), the landlord shall— (A) notify the tenant that the submittal has been received; and (B) transmit a copy of such submittal to the housing management office of the installation in which the housing unit is located. (3) (A) Not later than seven days after receiving a dispute submittal from a tenant under paragraph (1), the landlord shall— (i) submit to the tenant a decision regarding the dispute; and (ii) transmit a copy of such decision to the housing management office. (B) (i) For purposes of conducting an assessment necessary to make a decision under subparagraph (A) with respect to a housing unit, the landlord may access the housing unit at a time and for a duration mutually agreed upon by the landlord and the tenant. (ii) The tenant may request that an employee of the housing management office be present when the landlord accesses the housing unit of the tenant under clause (i). (c) Appeals (1) Not later than 30 days after a tenant receives a decision by a landlord under subsection (b)(3), the tenant may appeal that decision for review under subsection (d) by the commander of the military installation at which the housing unit is located. (2) Any appeal submitted under paragraph (1) shall be submitted— (A) on a standardized form; and (B) to an address designated by the commander for such purpose. (3) The Secretary shall ensure that, in preparing an appeal to the commander under this subsection, a tenant shall have access to advice and assistance from a military housing advocate employed by the military department concerned or a military legal assistance attorney under section 1044 of this title. (d) Review process (1) The commander of each military installation with housing units under this subchapter shall establish a military privatized housing dispute resolution appeals process— (A) to review and decide appeals by tenants under subsection (c) relating to such housing units; and (B) to review and decide requests to withhold payments under section 2891a of this title (2) (A) Before making any decision with respect to an appeal or a request under the process established under paragraph (1) with respect to a housing unit, the commander shall certify that the commander has solicited recommendations or information relating to such appeal or request from the following: (i) The chief of the housing management office of the installation. (ii) A representative of the landlord for the housing unit. (iii) The tenant filing the appeal or request. (iv) A qualified judge advocate of the military department concerned. (v) The civil engineer for the installation. (3) (A) The commander shall make a decision with respect to an appeal or a request under the process established under paragraph (1) not later than 30 days after the appeal or request has been made. (B) A commander may take longer than the 30-day period set forth under subparagraph (A) to make a decision described in such subparagraph in limited circumstances as determined by the Secretary of Defense, but in no case shall such a decision be made more than 60 days after the appeal or request has been made. (4) Decisions by a commander under this subsection shall be final. (e) Rule of construction on use of other adjudicative bodies Nothing in this section or any other provision of law shall be construed to prohibit a tenant of a housing unit under this subchapter from pursuing a claim against a landlord in any adjudicative body with jurisdiction over the housing unit or the claim. 2891a. Request to withhold payments (a) In general A member of the armed forces or family member of a member of the armed forces who is a tenant of a housing unit under this subchapter may submit to the commander of the installation of the Department of Defense at which the member is stationed a request to withhold all or part of any basic allowance for housing payable to the member (including for any dependents of the member in the member's household) under section 403 of title 37, or all or part of any pay of a tenant subject to allotment as described in section 2882(c) of this title, for lease of the unit during the period in which— (1) the landlord responsible for such housing unit has not met maintenance guidelines and procedures established by the landlord or the Department of Defense, either through contract or otherwise; or (2) such housing unit is uninhabitable according to State and local law for the jurisdiction in which the housing unit is located. (b) Procedures (1) Upon the filing of a request by a tenant under subsection (a)— (A) under such procedures as the Secretary of Defense shall establish, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) or such other appropriate office or offices of the Department of Defense as the Secretary shall specify for purposes of such procedures, shall tentatively grant the request and hold any amounts withheld in escrow with notice to the landlord; and (B) the housing management office of the installation in which the housing unit is located shall, not later than 15 days after the date on which the request was submitted to the commander of the installation, complete an investigation that includes an inspection conducted by housing inspectors that are certified at the State and local level. (2) If the commander agrees with a request by a tenant under subsection (a) with respect to a housing unit, the housing management office shall notify the landlord responsible for such unit of the issues described in subsection (a) that require remediation in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Defense or State or local law. (c) Remediation In accordance with procedures established under subsection (b)(1)(A) for the withholding of any basic allowance for housing or other allotment pay under this section, if the landlord responsible for the housing unit does not remediate the issues described in subsection (a) within a reasonable period of time established by the commander of the installation for the remediation of the issues, the amount payable to the landlord for such unit shall be reduced by 10 percent for each period of five days during which the issues are not remediated. (d) Disclosure of rights (1) Each housing management office of an installation of the Department of Defense shall disclose in writing to each new tenant of a housing unit under this subchapter, upon the signing of the lease for the housing unit, their rights with respect to the housing unit and the procedures under this section for submitting a request to the landlord responsible for the housing unit. (2) The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each lease entered into with a tenant for a housing unit under this subchapter clearly expresses in a separate addendum the procedures under this section for submitting a request to the landlord responsible for the housing unit. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by adding at the end the following new items: 2891. Landlord-tenant dispute resolution process. 2891a. Request to withhold payments. . (b) Modification of definition of military legal assistance Section 1044(d)(3)(B) of such title is amended by striking and 1565b(a)(1)(A) 1565b(a)(1)(A), and 2891(c)(3) (c) Timing of establishment Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish the dispute resolution process required under section 2891 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a). (d) Agreement by landlords (1) In general Not later than February 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall seek agreement from all landlords to participate in the dispute resolution process required under section 2891 of such title. (2) Submittal of list to Congress Not later than March 1, 2020, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a list of all landlords who did not agree under paragraph (1) to participate in the dispute resolution process under section 2891 of such title. (3) Consideration of lack of agreement in future contracts The Secretary shall include any lack of agreement under paragraph (1) as past performance considered under section 2888 of such title with respect to entering into or renewing any future contracts. 3032. Suspension of Resident Energy Conservation Program (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall suspend the initiative of the Department of Defense known as the Resident Energy Conservation Program (b) Term of suspension The suspension under subsection (a) shall remain in effect until the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that— (1) 100 percent of military housing on an installation of the Department of Defense is individually metered; and (2) energy audits conducted by an independent entity, or entities, confirm that such housing is individually metered. (c) Termination If the Secretary of Defense is unable to make the certification under subsection (b), each program described in subsection (a) shall be terminated on the date that is two years after the date of the enactment this Act. 3033. Access by tenants to historical maintenance information for privatized military housing (a) In general Subchapter IV of chapter 169 2892. Access by tenants to historical maintenance information The Secretary shall require each landlord that provides housing under this subchapter at an installation of the Department of Defense to provide a prospective tenant of such housing, before the tenant moves in, all information regarding maintenance conducted with respect to that housing unit for the previous 10 years. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2891 the following new item: 2892. Access by tenants to historical maintenance information. . 3034. Prohibition on use of call centers outside the United States for maintenance calls by tenants of privatized military housing (a) In general Subchapter IV of chapter 169 section 2886 2886a. Prohibiting use of call centers outside the United States for tenant maintenance calls A landlord responsible for a housing unit under this subchapter may not use a call center outside the United States for any call from a tenant relating to maintenance with respect to the housing unit. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2886 the following new item: 2886a. Prohibiting use of call centers outside the United States for tenant maintenance calls. . (c) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date that is one year after the date of the enactment of this Act. 3035. Radon testing for privatized military housing (a) Report Not later than March 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report identifying the installations of the Department of Defense that have privatized military housing that should be monitored for radon. (b) Initial testing (1) Procedures The Secretary shall establish testing procedures for all privatized military housing at installations identified under subsection (a), whether through regular testing of such housing or the installation of monitoring equipment, to ensure radon levels are below recommended levels established by the Environmental Protection Agency. (2) Completion of testing Not later than June 1, 2020, the Secretary shall complete testing described in paragraph (1) for all privatized military housing identified under subsection (a). (c) Notification regarding mitigation device In the event that a privatized military housing unit is determined under testing under subsection (b)(2) to need a radon mitigation device, the Secretary shall notify the landlord of such unit not later than seven days after such determination. (d) Annual testing Not less frequently than annually, the Secretary of each military department shall certify to the congressional defense committees that radon testing is being conducted for privatized military housing at installations identified under subsection (a) under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned, whether through regular testing of such housing or the installation of monitoring equipment. 3036. Expansion of windows covered by requirement to use window fall prevention devices in privatized military housing Section 2879(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 24 inches 42 inches 3037. Requirements relating to move out and maintenance with respect to privatized military housing Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of each military department, shall— (1) develop a uniform move-out checklist for tenants of privatized military housing throughout the Department of Defense to assist the oversight of such housing by the housing management office of the installation at which such housing is located; (2) develop a uniform checklist throughout the Department for the validation by the housing management office of the completion of all maintenance work related to health and safety issues at privatized military housing; and (3) require that all maintenance issues and work orders related to health and safety issues at privatized military housing be reported to the commander of the installation at which the housing is located. C Long-Term Quality Assurance 3041. Development of standardized documentation, templates, and forms for privatized military housing (a) In general The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of each military department, shall develop throughout the Department of Defense standardized documentation, templates, and forms for privatized military housing. (b) Initial guidance Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue guidance to develop the following: (1) Policies and standard operating procedures of the Department for privatized military housing. (2) A universal lease agreement for privatized military housing that includes— (A) the Tenant Bill of Rights under section 2887 of title 10, United States Code; and (B) any addendum required by the law of the State in which the housing unit is located. (3) A standardized operating agreement for landlords. (c) Military department plans Not later than February 1, 2020, the Secretary of each military department shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for the implementation of this section by that military department. 3042. Council on privatized military housing (a) In general The Assistant Secretary concerned shall establish a council (in this section referred to as the Council (b) Members (1) In general Each Council shall be comprised of the Assistant Secretary concerned and the following members selected by the Assistant Secretary concerned: (A) Not fewer than two civil engineers employed at an installation under the jurisdiction of the Assistant Secretary concerned. (B) Not fewer than two chiefs of a housing management office at such an installation. (C) Not fewer than two commanders of such an installation. (2) Limitation In each Council, not more than two members may be from the same installation. (3) Terms (A) Two years The term for a member of the Council, other than the Assistant Secretary concerned, shall be two years. (B) Limitation on terms A member of the Council, other than the Assistant Secretary concerned, may serve not more than two terms. (c) Duties Each Council shall review, at a minimum, the following: (1) Systemic concerns from tenants relating to privatized military housing under the jurisdiction of the Assistant Secretary concerned. (2) Best practices for housing management offices at installations under the jurisdiction of the Assistant Secretary concerned. (3) Best practices for handling installation-wide maintenance issues. (d) Meetings Each Council shall meet not less frequently than quarterly. (e) Report Not later than 60 days after the first meeting of the Council, and not later than October 1 of each year thereafter, the Council shall submit to the Secretary of Defense a report on the findings of the Council during the period covered by the report. (f) Assistant Secretary concerned The term Assistant Secretary concerned (1) with respect to the Army, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Energy, Installations, and Environment; (2) with respect to the Navy, the Marine Corps, and the Coast Guard when it is operating as a service in the Department of the Navy, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Energy, Installations, and Environment; and (3) with respect to the Air Force, the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Energy, Installations, and Environment. 3043. Requirements relating to management of privatized military housing (a) In general Subchapter IV of chapter 169 section 2872b 2872c. Requirements relating to management of housing (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the operating agreement for each installation of the Department of Defense at which on-base housing is managed by a landlord under this subchapter includes the requirements set forth in this section relating to such housing. (b) Requirements for installation commanders The commander of each installation described in subsection (a) shall do the following: (1) On an annual basis, review and approve the mold mitigation plan and pest control plan of each landlord at such installation. (2) Use the assigned bio-environmental personnel or contractor equivalent at such installation to test for mold, unsafe water conditions, and other health and safety conditions if requested by the head of the housing management office of such installation. (c) Requirements for housing management office The head of the housing management office of each installation described in subsection (a) shall, with respect to housing units under this subchapter, do the following: (1) Conduct physical inspections and approve the habitability of each vacant housing unit before the landlord offers the unit available for occupancy. (2) Conduct physical inspections upon tenant move out and receive copies of any move out charges that a landlord seeks to collect from an outgoing tenant. (3) Establish contact with a tenant regarding the satisfaction of the tenant with the housing unit not later than— (A) 15 days after move-in; and (B) 60 days after move-in. (4) Maintain all test results relating to the health, environmental, and safety condition of a housing unit and the results of any official housing inspection for the life of the contract relating to that housing unit. (d) Requirements for landlords The landlord of any housing unit under this subchapter at an installation described in subsection (a) shall do the following: (1) Disclose to the Secretary of Defense bonus structures for community managers and regional executives and bonus structures relating to maintenance to minimize the impact of those incentives on the operating budget of the installation. (2) With respect to test results relating to the health and safety condition of the housing unit— (A) not later than three days after receiving those results, share those results with the tenant of such unit and submit those results to the head of the housing management office for the installation; and (B) include with any environmental hazard test results a simple guide explaining those results, preferably citing standards set forth by the Federal Government relating to environmental hazards. (3) Conduct a walkthrough inspection before a prospective tenant signs a lease— (A) with the prospective tenant; or (B) if the prospective tenant is not able to be present for the inspection, with an official of the housing management office designated by the prospective tenant to conduct the inspection on their behalf. (4) In the event that the housing unit does not meet minimum health, safety, and welfare standards set forth in Federal, State, and local law after inspection under subsection (c)(1), the landlord shall remediate any issues and make any appropriate repairs prior to another inspection by the housing management office under such subsection. (5) Not conduct any promotional events to incentivize tenants to fill out maintenance comment cards or satisfaction surveys of any kind without the approval of the chief of the housing management office. (6) Not award an installation of the Department or an officer or employee of the Department a Partner of the Year (7) Not have a tenant agree to any form of settlement, nondisclosure, or release of liability without— (A) first notifying the tenant of their right to assistance from the legal assistance office at the installation; and (B) not later than five days before agreeing to any such settlement, nondisclosure, or release of liability, providing a copy of such agreement to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment; (8) Not change the position of a prospective tenant on a waiting list for a housing unit or remove a prospective tenant from the waiting list if the prospective tenant turns down an offer for a housing unit determined unsatisfactory by the prospective tenant and confirmed by the housing management office and the commander of the installation. (9) Allow, with permission of the tenant as appropriate, employees of the housing management office and other officers and employees of the Department to conduct physical inspections of common grounds and individual quarters of the housing unit. (10) Agree to a mechanism under which all or part of basic allowance for housing payable to the tenant (including for any dependents of the tenant in the tenant's household) under section 403 of title 37, or all or part of any other allotment of pay under section 2882(c) of this title can be held in escrow until— (A) any dispute between the tenant and the landlord is resolved; and (B) the commander of the installation has reviewed and decided such dispute. (11) Ensure that the needs of enrollees in the Exceptional Family Member Program, or any successor program, are considered in assigning prospective tenants to housing units. (12) Keep any maintenance work order system up to date with the latest software, functionality, and features. (13) Have any agreements or forms to be used by the landlord approved by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment, including the following: (A) A common lease agreement. (B) Any disclosure or nondisclosure forms that could be given to a tenant. (C) Any notices required to be provided to the tenant under the Tenant Bill of Rights under section 2887 of this title. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2872b the following new item: 2872c. Requirements relating to management of housing. . (c) Military department plans Not later than February 1, 2020, the Secretary of each military department shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for the implementation by that military department of section 2872c of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a). 3044. Requirements relating to contracts for privatized military housing (a) In general Subchapter IV of chapter 169 section 2872c 2872d. Requirements relating to contracts for provision of housing (a) In general The Secretary of each military department shall include in any contract for a term of more than 10 years with a landlord for the provision of housing under this subchapter at an installation under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned the following: (1) The Secretary concerned may renegotiate the contract with the landlord not less frequently than once every five years. (2) The landlord shall prohibit any employee of the landlord who commits work order fraud under the contract, as determined by the Secretary concerned, from doing any work under the contract. (3) If the landlord fails to or is unable to remedy any health or environmental hazard at a housing unit under the contract, such failure or inability will be taken into consideration in determining whether to pay or withhold all or part of any incentive fees for which the landlord may be eligible under the contract. (4) If the landlord is found by the Secretary concerned to have not maintained the minimum standards of habitability for a housing unit under such contract, the landlord shall pay all medical bills for a tenant of such housing unit that are associated with the conditions of such housing unit that do not meet such minimum standards. (5) The landlord shall pay reasonable relocation costs associated with the permanent relocation of a tenant from a housing unit of the landlord to new housing due to health or environmental hazards— (A) present in the housing unit being vacated through no fault of the tenant; and (B) confirmed by the housing management office of the installation as making the unit uninhabitable. (6) The landlord shall pay reasonable relocation costs and actual costs of living, including per diem, associated with the temporary relocation of a tenant to new housing due to health or environmental hazards— (A) present in the housing unit being vacated through no fault of the tenant; and (B) confirmed by the housing management office of the installation as making the unit uninhabitable. (7) The landlord shall ensure that the maintenance work order system of the landlord (hardware and software) is up to date, including by — (A) providing a reliable mechanism through which a tenant may submit work order requests through an Internet portal and mobile application, which shall incorporate the ability to upload photos, communicate with maintenance personnel, and rate individual service calls; (B) allowing real-time access to such system by officials of the Department at the installation, major subordinate command, and service-wide levels; and (C) allowing the work order or maintenance ticket to be closed only once the tenant and the head of the housing management office of the installation sign off. (b) Payment of actual costs of living The landlord shall pay actual costs of living under subsection (a)(6) in connection with a health or environmental hazard until such time as— (1) (A) the health or environmental hazard is remediated; (B) the housing unit being vacated is determined to be habitable by the tenant, the housing management office of the installation, and chain of command; and (C) the tenant resumes occupancy of the housing unit; or (2) the tenant moves to a new housing unit. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2872c the following new item: 2872d. Requirements relating to contracts for provision of housing. . (c) Effective date Section 2872d of such title, as added by subsection (a), shall apply to contracts entered into or renewed on and after the date of the enactment of this Act. 3045. Withholding of incentive fees for landlords of privatized military housing for failure to remedy a health or environmental hazard (a) In general Subchapter IV of chapter 169 section 2874b 2874c. Withholding of incentive fees for landlords The Secretary of Defense shall withhold incentive fees paid to a landlord for failure by the landlord to remedy a health or environmental hazard at a housing unit under this subchapter, as determined by the Secretary. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2874b the following new item: 2874c. Withholding of incentive fees for landlords. . 3046. Expansion of direct hire authority for Department of Defense for childcare services providers for Department child development centers to include direct hire authority for installation military housing office personnel (a) In general Section 559 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 10 U.S.C. 1792 (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting , and individuals to fill vacancies in installation military housing offices, childcare services providers (B) in paragraph (1), by inserting or for employees at installation military housing offices (C) in paragraph (2), by inserting or for installation military housing office employees (2) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and (3) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f): (f) Installation military housing office defined The term installation military housing office chapter 169 . (b) Heading and technical amendments (1) Heading amendment The heading of such section is amended to read as follows: 599. Direct hire authority for Department of Defense for childcare services providers for Department child development centers and installation military housing offices . (2) Technical amendment Subsection (d) of such section is amended by striking Oversight and Government Reform Oversight and Reform (c) Use of existing regulations The Secretary of Defense shall use the authority in section 599 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 granted by the amendments made by this section in a manner consistent with the regulations prescribed for purposes of such section 599 pursuant to subsection (b) of such section 599, without the need to prescribe separate regulations for the use of such authority. 3047. Plan on establishment of Department of Defense jurisdiction over off-base privatized military housing Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of each military department, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan to establish jurisdiction by the Department of Defense, concurrently with local community law enforcement, at locations with privatized military housing that is not located on an installation of the Department of Defense. D Other Housing Matters 3051. Lead-based paint testing and reporting (a) Establishment of Department of Defense policy on lead testing on military installations (1) In general Not later than February 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a policy under which— (A) a qualified individual may access a military installation for the purpose of conducting lead testing on the installation, subject to the approval of the Secretary; and (B) the results of any lead testing conducted on a military installation shall be transmitted— (i) in the case of a military installation located inside the United States, to— (I) the civil engineer of the installation; (II) the housing management office of the installation; (III) the major subordinate command of the Armed Force with jurisdiction over the installation; and (IV) if required by law, any relevant Federal, State, and local agencies; and (ii) in the case of a military installation located outside the United States, to the civil engineer or commander of the installation who shall transmit those results to the major subordinate command of the Armed Force with jurisdiction over the installation. (2) Definitions In this subsection: (A) United States The term United States (B) Qualified individual The term qualified individual (i) a lead-based paint inspector; or (ii) a lead-based paint risk assessor. (b) Annual reporting on lead-based paint in military housing (1) In general Subchapter III of chapter 169 2869a. Annual reporting on lead-based paint in military housing (a) Annual reports (1) In general Not later than February 1 of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that sets forth, with respect to military housing under the jurisdiction of each Secretary of a military department for the calendar year preceding the year in which the report is submitted, the following: (A) A certification that indicates whether the military housing under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned is in compliance with the requirements respecting lead-based paint, lead-based paint activities, and lead-based paint hazards described in section 408 of the Toxic Substances Control Act ( 15 U.S.C. 2688 (B) A detailed summary of the data, disaggregated by military department, used in making the certification under subparagraph (A). (C) The total number of military housing units under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned that were inspected for lead-based paint in accordance with the requirements described in subparagraph (A). (D) The total number of military housing units under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned that were not inspected for lead-based paint. (E) The total number of military housing units that were found to contain lead-based paint in the course of the inspections described in subparagraph (C). (F) A description of any abatement efforts with respect to lead-based paint conducted regarding the military housing units described in subparagraph (E). (2) Publication The Secretary of Defense shall publish each report submitted under paragraph (1) on a publicly available website of the Department of Defense. (b) Military housing defined In this section, the term military housing . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 2869a. Annual reporting on lead-based paint in military housing. . 3052. Satisfaction survey for tenants of military housing (a) In general Not later than March 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall require that each installation of the Department of Defense use the same satisfaction survey for tenants of military housing, which shall be an electronic survey with embedded privacy and security mechanisms. (b) Privacy and security mechanisms The privacy and security mechanisms used under subsection (a)— (1) may include a code unique to the tenant to be surveyed that is sent to the cell phone number of the tenant and required to be entered to access the survey; and (2) in the case of housing under subchapter IV of chapter 169 3053. Information on legal services provided to members of the Armed Forces harmed by health or environmental hazards at military housing (a) Report Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the legal services that the Secretary may provide to members of the Armed Forces who have been harmed by a health or environmental hazard while living in military housing. (b) Availability of information The Secretary of the military department concerned shall make the information contained in the report submitted under subsection (a) available to members of the Armed Forces at all installations of the Department of Defense in the United States. 3054. Mitigation of risks posed by certain items in military family housing units (a) Anchoring of items by residents The Secretary of Defense shall allow a resident of a military family housing unit to anchor any furniture, television, or large appliance to the wall of the unit for purposes of preventing such item from tipping over without incurring a penalty or obligation to repair the wall upon vacating the unit. (b) Anchoring of items for all units (1) Existing units Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that all freestanding chests, door chests, armoires, dressers, entertainment centers, bookcases taller than 27 inches, televisions, and large appliances provided by the Department of Defense are securely anchored in each furnished military family housing unit under the jurisdiction of the Department as of the date of the enactment of this Act. (2) New units The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that all freestanding chests, door chests, armoires, dressers, entertainment centers, bookcases taller than 27 inches, televisions, and large appliances provided by the Department of Defense are securely anchored in each furnished military family housing unit made available after the date of the enactment of this Act. 3055. Technical correction to certain payments for lessors of privatized military housing Paragraph (3) of section 606(d) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( Public Law 115–232 10 U.S.C. 2871 (3) The term MHPI housing chapter 169 . 3056. Pilot program to build and monitor use of single family homes (a) In general The Secretary of the Army shall carry out a pilot program to build and monitor the use of not fewer than 5 single family homes for members of the Army and their families. (b) Location The Secretary of the Army shall carry out the pilot program at an installation of the Army as determined by the Secretary. (c) Design In building homes under the pilot program, the Secretary of the Army shall use the All-American Abode design from the suburban single-family division design by the United States Military Academy. (d) Authorization of appropriations There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Army $1,000,000 to carry out the pilot program under this section. C DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS XXXI DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS A National Security Programs and Authorizations 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2020 for the activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701. (b) Authorization of new plant projects From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new plant projects for the National Nuclear Security Administration as follows: Project 20–D–931, KL Fuel Development Laboratory, Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, Schenectady, New York, $23,700,000. General Purpose Project, PF–4 Power and Communications Systems Upgrade, Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, $16,000,000. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2020 for defense environmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701. (b) Authorization of new plant projects From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out, for defense environmental cleanup activities, the following new plant projects: Project 20–D–401, Saltstone Disposal Units numbers 10, 11, and 12, Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina, $1,000,000. Project 20–D–402, Advanced Manufacturing Collaborative, Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina, $50,000,000. Project 20–U–401, On-Site Waste Disposal Facility (Cell Lines 2 and 3), Portsmouth Site, Pike County, Ohio, $10,000,000. 3103. Other defense activities Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2020 for other defense activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701. 3104. Nuclear energy Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2020 for nuclear energy as specified in the funding table in section 4701. B Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations 3111. Technical corrections to National Nuclear Security Administration Act and Atomic Energy Defense Act (a) Definitions in National Nuclear Security Administration Act Section 3281(2)(A) of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2471(2)(A) Plant National Security Campus (b) Amendments to Atomic Energy Defense Act (1) Definitions Section 4002(9)(A) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2501(9)(A) Plant National Security Campus (2) Stockpile stewardship, management, and responsiveness plan Section 4203 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2523 (A) in subsection (d)(4)(A)(ii), by striking quadrennial defense review if such strategy has not been submitted national defense strategy (B) in subsection (e)(1)(A)(i), by striking or the most recent quadrennial defense review, as applicable under subsection (d)(4)(A), and the referred to in subsection (d)(4)(A)(i), the most recent the national defense strategy, and the most recent (C) in subsection (f)— (i) by striking paragraph (4); (ii) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and (iii) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3): (3) The term national defense strategy . (3) Manufacturing infrastructure for nuclear weapons stockpile Section 4212 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2532 (A) in subsection (a)(1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting most recent Nuclear Posture Review (B) in subsection (b)— (i) in paragraph (2), by striking Plant National Security Complex (ii) in paragraph (4), by striking Plant National Security Campus, Kansas City, Missouri (4) Reports on life extension programs (A) In general Section 4216 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2536 (i) in the section heading, by striking lifetime life (ii) by striking lifetime life (B) Clerical amendment The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 4216 and inserting the following new item: Sec. 4216. Reports on life extension programs. . (5) Advice on safety, security, and reliability of nuclear weapons stockpile Section 4218 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2538 (A) in subsection (d), by striking or the Commander of the United States Strategic Command (B) in subsection (e)(1)— (i) by striking , a member of Strategic Command or a member of the Nuclear Weapons Council (ii) by striking , member, or Commander or member (6) Life-cycle cost estimates Section 4714(a) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2754(a) (A) by striking 413.3 413.3B (B) by inserting , or a successor order, assets) (7) Unfunded priorities (A) In general Section 4716 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2756 National Nuclear Security Administration Administration (B) Clerical amendment The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 4716 and inserting the following new item: Sec. 4716. Unfunded priorities of the Administration. . (8) Reviews of capital assets acquisition projects Section 4733(d)(3)(B) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2773(d)(3)(B) 413.3 413.3B 3112. National Nuclear Security Administration Personnel System (a) In general Subtitle C of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2441 3248. Alternative personnel system (a) In general The Administrator may adapt the pay banding and performance-based pay adjustment demonstration project carried out by the Administration under the authority provided by section 4703 of title 5, United States Code, into a permanent alternative personnel system for the Administration (to be known as the National Nuclear Security Administration Personnel System (b) Modifications In adapting the demonstration project described in subsection (a) into a permanent alternative personnel system, the Administrator— (1) may, subject to paragraph (2), revise the requirements and limitations of the demonstration project to the extent necessary; and (2) shall— (A) ensure that the permanent alternative personnel system is carried out in a manner consistent with the final plan for the demonstration project published in the Federal Register on December 21, 2007 (72 Fed. Reg. 72776); (B) ensure that significant changes in the system not take effect until revisions to the plan for the demonstration project are approved by the Office of Personnel Management and published in the Federal Register; (C) ensure that procedural modifications or clarifications to the final plan for the demonstration project be made through local notification processes; (D) authorize, and establish incentives for, employees of the Administration to have rotational assignments among different programs of the Administration, the headquarters and field offices of the Administration, and the management and operating contractors of the Administration; and (E) establish requirements for employees of the Administration who are in the permanent alternative personnel system described in subsection (a) to be promoted to senior-level positions in the Administration, including requirements with respect to— (i) professional training and continuing education; and (ii) a certain number and types of rotational assignments under subparagraph (D), as determined by the Administrator. (c) Application to Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program The Director of the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program established pursuant to section 4101 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2511 (1) all employees of the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program in the competitive service (as defined in section 2102 of title 5, United States Code); and (2) all employees of the Department of Navy who are assigned to the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program and are in the excepted service (as defined in section 2103 of title 5, United States Code) (other than such employees in statutory excepted service systems). . (b) Briefing (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall provide a briefing to the appropriate congressional committees on the implementation of section 3248 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act, as added by subsection (a). (2) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this subsection, the term appropriate congressional committees (A) the congressional defense committees; (B) the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives; and (C) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives. (c) Conforming amendments Section 3116 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 ( Public Law 115–91 50 U.S.C. 2441 (1) by striking subsections (a) and (d); and (2) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (a) and (b), respectively. (d) Clerical amendment The table of contents for the National Nuclear Security Administration Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 3247 the following new item: Sec. 3248. Alternative personnel system. . 3113. Contracting, program management, scientific, engineering, and technical positions at National Nuclear Security Administration (a) In general Section 3241 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2441 (1) by striking may shall (2) by striking not more than 600 (b) Conforming amendments Such section is further amended— (1) in the section heading, by striking Authority to establish Establishment of (2) in the second sentence, by striking Subject to the limitations in the preceding sentence, the authority The authority (c) Clerical amendment The table of contents for the National Nuclear Security Administration Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 3241 and inserting the following new item: Sec. 3241. Establishment of contracting, program management, scientific, engineering, and technical positions. . 3114. Prohibition on use of laboratory-directed research and development funds for general and administrative overhead costs Section 4811 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2791 (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d): (d) Funds provided to a national security laboratory or nuclear weapons production facility for laboratory-directed research and development may not be used to cover the costs of general and administrative overhead for the laboratory or facility. . 3115. Prohibition on use of funds for advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium None of the funds authorized to be appropriated for the National Nuclear Security Administration for fiscal year 2020 or any fiscal year thereafter may be obligated or expended to conduct research and development of an advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium until the following certifications are submitted to the congressional defense committees: (1) A joint certification of the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of Defense that the determination made by the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of the Navy pursuant to section 3118(c)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 ( Public Law 114–92 (2) A certification of the Secretary of the Navy that an advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium would not reduce vessel capability, increase expense, or reduce operational availability as a result of refueling requirements. C Plans and Reports 3121. Estimation of costs of meeting defense environmental cleanup milestones required by consent orders (a) In general Subtitle A of title XLIV of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2581 4409. Estimation of costs of meeting defense environmental cleanup milestones required by consent orders The Secretary of Energy shall include in the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Energy budget for each fiscal year (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code) a report on the cost of meeting milestones required by a consent order at each defense nuclear facility at which defense environmental cleanup activities are occurring. The report shall include, for each such facility— (1) a specification of the cost of meeting such milestones during that fiscal year; and (2) an estimate of the cost of meeting such milestones during the four fiscal years following that fiscal year. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4408 the following new item: Sec. 4409. Estimation of costs of meeting defense environmental cleanup milestones required by consent orders. . 3122. Extension of suspension of certain assessments relating to nuclear weapons stockpile Section 3255(b) of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2455(b) fiscal year 2018 or 2019 any of fiscal years 2018 through 2023 3123. Repeal of requirement for review relating to enhanced procurement authority Section 4806 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act ( 50 U.S.C. 2786 (1) by striking subsection (e); and (2) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (e) and (f), respectively. 3124. Determination of effect of treaty obligations with respect to producing tritium Not later than February 15, 2020, the Secretary of Energy shall— (1) determine whether the Agreement for Cooperation on the Uses of Atomic Energy for Mutual Defense Purposes, signed at Washington July 3, 1958 (9 UST 1028), between the United States and the United Kingdom, permits the United States to obtain low-enriched uranium for the purposes of producing tritium in the United States; and (2) submit to the congressional defense committees a report on that determination. 3125. Assessment of high energy density physics (a) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall enter into an arrangement with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to conduct an assessment of recent advances and the current status of research in the field of high energy density physics. (b) Elements The assessment conducted under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) Theoretical and computational modeling of high energy density material phases, radiation-matter interactions, plasmas atypical of astrophysical conditions, and conditions unique to the National Nuclear Security Administration. (2) The simulation of such phases, interactions, plasmas, and conditions. (3) Instrumentation and target fabrication. (4) Workforce training. (5) An assessment of advancements made by other countries in high energy density physics. (6) Such others items as are agreed upon by the Administrator and the National Academies. (c) Applicability of internal controls The assessment under subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with the internal controls of the National Academies. (d) Report to Congress Not later than 18 months after entering into the arrangement under subsection (a), the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the assessment conducted under that subsection. (e) High energy density physics defined In this section, the term high energy density physics (1) energy densities exceeding 100,000,000,000 joules per cubic meter; and (2) other temperature and pressure ranges within the warm dense matter regime. XXXII DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD 3201. Authorization There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020, $29,450,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 ( 42 U.S.C. 2286 3202. Improvement of management and organization of Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (a) Provision of information to Board Subsection (c) of section 311 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 ( 42 U.S.C. 2286 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking paragraphs (5), (6), and (7) paragraphs (5) and (6) (2) by striking paragraph (6); and (3) by redesignating paragraph (7) as paragraph (6). (b) Executive director for operations Paragraph (6) of such subsection, as redesignated by subsection (a)(3), is further amended in subparagraph (C)— (1) by redesignating clauses (i), (ii), and (iii) as clauses (ii), (iii), and (iv), respectively; and (2) by inserting before clause (ii), as redesignated by paragraph (1), the following new clause (i): (i) The executive director for operations, who shall report directly to the Chairman. . (c) Organization of staff of Board Section 313(b) of such Act ( 42 U.S.C. 2286b(b) (1) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking section 311(c)(7) section 311(c)(6) (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) Subject to the approval of the Board, the Chairman may organize the staff of the Board as the Chairman considers appropriate to best accomplish the mission of the Board described in section 312(a). . 3203. Membership of Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (a) List of candidates for nomination Subsection (b) of section 311 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 ( 42 U.S.C. 2286 (4) The President shall enter into an arrangement with the National Academy of Sciences under which the National Academy shall maintain a list of individuals who meet the qualifications described in paragraph (1) to assist the President in selecting individuals to nominate for positions as members of the Board. . (b) Terms of members (1) In general Subsection (d) of such section is amended— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking the second sentence and inserting the following new sentence: A member of the Board may not serve for two consecutive terms. (B) in paragraph (3), by striking the second sentence and inserting the following new sentence: A member may not serve after the expiration of the member's term. (2) Effective date The amendments made by paragraph (1) shall take effect on April 1, 2020. (c) Filling vacancies Such subsection is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) (A) Not later than 180 days after the expiration of the term of a member of the Board, the President shall— (i) submit to the Senate the nomination of an individual to fill the vacancy; or (ii) submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate a report that includes— (I) a description of the reasons the President did not submit such a nomination; and (II) a plan for submitting such a nomination during the 90-day period following the submission of the report. (B) If the President does not submit to the Senate the nomination of an individual to fill a vacancy during the 90-day period described in subclause (II) of subparagraph (A)(ii), the President shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services a report described in that subparagraph not less frequently than every 90 days until the President submits such a nomination. . XXXV MARITIME ADMINISTRATION 3501. Maritime Administration Section 109 of title 49, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 109. Maritime Administration (a) Organization and mission The Maritime Administration is an administration in the Department of Transportation. The mission of the Maritime Administration is to foster, promote, and develop the merchant maritime industry of the United States. (b) Maritime Administrator The head of the Maritime Administration is the Maritime Administrator, who is appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Administrator shall report directly to the Secretary of Transportation and carry out the duties prescribed by the Secretary. (c) Deputy Maritime Administrator The Maritime Administration shall have a Deputy Maritime Administrator, who is appointed in the competitive service by the Secretary, after consultation with the Administrator. The Deputy Administrator shall carry out the duties prescribed by the Administrator. The Deputy Administrator shall be Acting Administrator during the absence or disability of the Administrator and, unless the Secretary designates another individual, during a vacancy in the office of Administrator. (d) Duties and powers vested in Secretary All duties and powers of the Maritime Administration are vested in the Secretary. (e) Regional offices The Maritime Administration shall have regional offices for the Atlantic, Gulf, Great Lakes, and Pacific port ranges, and may have other regional offices as necessary. The Secretary shall appoint a qualified individual as Director of each regional office. The Secretary shall carry out appropriate activities and programs of the Maritime Administration through the regional offices. (f) Interagency and industry relations The Secretary shall establish and maintain liaison with other agencies, and with representative trade organizations throughout the United States, concerned with the transportation of commodities by water in the export and import foreign commerce of the United States, for the purpose of securing preference to vessels of the United States for the transportation of those commodities. (g) Detailing officers from Armed Forces To assist the Secretary in carrying out duties and powers relating to the Maritime Administration, not more than five officers of the Armed Forces may be detailed to the Secretary at any one time, in addition to details authorized by any other law. During the period of a detail, the Secretary shall pay the officer an amount that, when added to the officer's pay and allowances as an officer in the Armed Forces, makes the officer's total pay and allowances equal to the amount that would be paid to an individual performing work the Secretary considers to be of similar importance, difficulty, and responsibility as that performed by the officer during the detail. (h) Contracts, cooperative agreements, and audits (1) Contracts and cooperative agreements In the same manner that a private corporation may make a contract within the scope of its authority under its charter, the Secretary may make contracts and cooperative agreements for the United States Government and disburse amounts to— (A) carry out the Secretary's duties and powers under this section, subtitle V of title 46, and all other Maritime Administration programs; and (B) protect, preserve, and improve collateral held by the Secretary to secure indebtedness. (2) Audits The financial transactions of the Secretary under paragraph (1) shall be audited by the Comptroller General. The Comptroller General shall allow credit for an expenditure shown to be necessary because of the nature of the business activities authorized by this section or subtitle V of title 46. At least once a year, the Comptroller General shall report to Congress any departure by the Secretary from this section or subtitle V of title 46. (i) Grant administrative expenses Except as otherwise provided by law, the administrative and related expenses for the administration of any grant programs by the Maritime Administrator may not exceed 3 percent. (j) Authorization of appropriations (1) In general Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, there are authorized to be appropriated such amounts as may be necessary to carry out the duties and powers of the Secretary relating to the Maritime Administration. (2) Limitations Only those amounts specifically authorized by law may be appropriated for the use of the Maritime Administration for— (A) acquisition, construction, or reconstruction of vessels; (B) construction-differential subsidies incident to the construction, reconstruction, or reconditioning of vessels; (C) costs of national defense features; (D) payments of obligations incurred for operating-differential subsidies; (E) expenses necessary for research and development activities, including reimbursement of the Vessel Operations Revolving Fund for losses resulting from expenses of experimental vessel operations; (F) the Vessel Operations Revolving Fund; (G) National Defense Reserve Fleet expenses; (H) expenses necessary to carry out part B of subtitle V of title 46; and (I) other operations and training expenses related to the development of waterborne transportation systems, the use of waterborne transportation systems, and general administration. . D Funding Tables 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables (a) In general Whenever a funding table in this division specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program, or activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified dollar amount for the project, program, or activity is hereby authorized, subject to the availability of appropriations. (b) Merit-based decisions A decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of a dollar amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall— (1) be based on merit-based selection procedures in accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States Code, or on competitive procedures; and (2) comply with other applicable provisions of law. (c) Relationship to transfer and programming authority An amount specified in the funding tables in this division may be transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer or reprogramming authority provided by another provision of this Act or by other law. The transfer or reprogramming of an amount specified in such funding tables shall not count against a ceiling on such transfers or reprogrammings under section 1001 or section 1522 of this Act or any other provision of law, unless such transfer or reprogramming would move funds between appropriation accounts. (d) Applicability to classified annex This section applies to any classified annex that accompanies this Act. (e) Oral written communications No oral or written communication concerning any amount specified in the funding tables in this division shall supersede the requirements of this section. XLI PROCUREMENT 4101. PROCUREMENT SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT Line Item FY 2020 Senate AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY FIXED WING 2 UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT 16,000 0 Program zeroed out in FYDP [–16,000] 4 RQ–11 (RAVEN) 23,510 23,510 ROTARY 5 TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (TUAS) 12,100 12,100 8 AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN 806,849 806,849 9 AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN AP 190,870 190,870 10 AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIB NEW BUILD 0 105,000 Increase fielding for Active and ARNG units [105,000] 12 UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) 1,411,540 1,271,540 Funding ahead of acquisition strategy [–140,000] 13 UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) AP 79,572 79,572 14 UH–60 BLACK HAWK L AND V MODELS 169,290 204,290 Increase fielding for ARNG units [35,000] 15 CH–47 HELICOPTER 140,290 140,290 16 CH–47 HELICOPTER AP 18,186 18,186 MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 19 UNIVERSAL GROUND CONTROL EQUIPMENT (UAS) 2,090 2,090 20 GRAY EAGLE MODS2 14,699 14,699 21 MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) 35,189 35,189 22 AH–64 MODS 58,172 58,172 23 CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP) 11,785 11,785 24 GRCS SEMA MODS (MIP) 5,677 5,677 25 ARL SEMA MODS (MIP) 6,566 6,566 26 EMARSS SEMA MODS (MIP) 3,859 3,859 27 UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS 15,476 15,476 28 UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS 6,744 6,744 29 NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN 105,442 105,442 30 COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE 164,315 164,315 32 GATM ROLLUP 30,966 30,966 33 RQ–7 UAV MODS 8,983 8,983 34 UAS MODS 10,205 10,205 GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS 35 AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT 52,297 52,297 36 SURVIVABILITY CM 8,388 8,388 37 CMWS 13,999 13,999 38 COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) 168,784 168,784 OTHER SUPPORT 39 AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 1,777 1,777 40 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT 18,624 18,624 41 AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS 48,255 48,255 42 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 32,738 32,738 44 LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET 2,201 2,201 45 LAUNCHER GUIDED MISSILE: LONGBOW HELLFIRE XM2 991 991 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY 3,696,429 3,680,429 MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM 1 SYSTEM INTEGRATION AND TEST PROCUREMENT 0 113,857 Transfer back to base funding [113,857] 2 M-SHORAD—PROCUREMENT 0 103,800 Transfer back to base funding [103,800] 3 MSE MISSILE 0 698,603 Transfer back to base funding [698,603] 4 INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INC 2–I 0 239,237 Full funding of Iron Dome battery [229,900] Transfer back to base funding [9,337] 5 THAAD 0 425,900 THAAD program transfer from MDA [425,900] AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 6 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY 0 193,284 Transfer back to base funding [193,284] 7 JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MSLS (JAGM) 0 233,353 Transfer back to base funding [233,353] ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS 8 JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY 0 138,405 Transfer back to base funding [138,405] 9 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY 0 114,340 Transfer back to base funding [114,340] 10 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY AP 0 10,500 Transfer back to base funding [10,500] 11 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) 0 797,213 Transfer back to base funding [797,213] 12 MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR) 0 27,555 Transfer back to base funding [27,555] 14 ARMY TACTICAL MSL SYS (ATACMS)—SYS SUM 0 209,842 Transfer back to base funding [209,842] MODIFICATIONS 16 PATRIOT MODS 0 279,464 Transfer back to base funding [279,464] 17 ATACMS MODS 0 85,320 Transfer back to base funding [85,320] 18 GMLRS MOD 0 5,094 Transfer back to base funding [5,094] 19 STINGER MODS 0 81,615 Transfer back to base funding [81,615] 20 AVENGER MODS 0 14,107 Transfer back to base funding [14,107] 21 ITAS/TOW MODS 0 3,469 Transfer back to base funding [3,469] 22 MLRS MODS 0 39,019 Transfer back to base funding [39,019] 23 HIMARS MODIFICATIONS 0 12,483 Transfer back to base funding [12,483] SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 24 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 0 26,444 Transfer back to base funding [26,444] SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 25 AIR DEFENSE TARGETS 0 10,593 Transfer back to base funding [10,593] TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY 0 3,863,497 PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 2 ARMORED MULTI PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV) 264,040 264,040 MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 3 STRYKER (MOD) 144,387 393,587 UPL Stryker lethality 30 mm cannon [249,200] 4 STRYKER UPGRADE 550,000 550,000 5 BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD) 638,781 598,781 Excess to need due to termination of subprogram [–40,000] 6 M109 FOV MODIFICATIONS 25,756 25,756 7 PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM) 553,425 553,425 9 ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD) 2,821 2,821 10 ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE 31,697 31,697 11 M88 FOV MODS 4,500 4,500 12 JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE 205,517 205,517 13 M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD) 348,800 348,800 14 ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM 1,752,784 1,717,784 Early to need [–35,000] WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES 16 MULTI-ROLE ANTI-ARMOR ANTI-PERSONNEL WEAPON S 19,420 19,420 17 GUN AUTOMATIC 30MM M230 20,000 20,000 19 MORTAR SYSTEMS 14,907 14,907 20 XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM) 191 191 21 PRECISION SNIPER RIFLE 7,977 7,977 22 COMPACT SEMI-AUTOMATIC SNIPER SYSTEM 9,860 9,860 23 CARBINE 30,331 30,331 24 SMALL ARMS—FIRE CONTROL 8,060 8,060 25 COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION 24,007 24,007 26 HANDGUN 6,174 6,174 MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH 28 MK–19 GRENADE MACHINE GUN MODS 3,737 3,737 29 M777 MODS 2,367 2,367 30 M4 CARBINE MODS 17,595 17,595 33 M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS 8,000 8,000 34 SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS 2,426 2,426 35 M119 MODIFICATIONS 6,269 6,269 36 MORTAR MODIFICATION 1,693 1,693 37 MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) 4,327 4,327 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 38 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) 3,066 3,066 39 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV) 2,651 2,651 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY 4,715,566 4,889,766 PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 1 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES 0 68,949 Transfer back to base funding [68,949] 2 CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES 0 114,228 Transfer back to base funding [114,228] 3 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES 0 17,807 Transfer back to base funding [17,807] 4 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES 0 63,966 Transfer back to base funding [63,966] 5 CTG, 20MM, ALL TYPES 0 35,920 Transfer back to base funding [35,920] 6 CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES 0 8,990 Transfer back to base funding [8,990] 7 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES 0 68,813 Transfer back to base funding [68,813] 8 CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES 0 103,952 Transfer back to base funding [103,952] MORTAR AMMUNITION 9 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES 0 50,580 Transfer back to base funding [50,580] 10 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES 0 59,373 Transfer back to base funding [59,373] 11 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES 0 125,452 Transfer back to base funding [125,452] TANK AMMUNITION 12 CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES 0 171,284 Transfer back to base funding [171,284] ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 13 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES 0 44,675 Transfer back to base funding [44,675] 14 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES 0 266,037 Transfer back to base funding [266,037] 15 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982 0 57,434 Transfer back to base funding [57,434] 16 ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL 0 271,602 Transfer back to base funding [271,602] MINES 17 MINES & CLEARING CHARGES, ALL TYPES 0 55,433 Transfer back to base funding [55,433] ROCKETS 18 SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES 0 74,878 Transfer back to base funding [74,878] 19 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES 0 175,994 Transfer back to base funding [175,994] OTHER AMMUNITION 20 CAD/PAD, ALL TYPES 0 7,595 Transfer back to base funding [7,595] 21 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES 0 51,651 Transfer back to base funding [51,651] 22 GRENADES, ALL TYPES 0 40,592 Transfer back to base funding [40,592] 23 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES 0 18,609 Transfer back to base funding [18,609] 24 SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES 0 16,054 Transfer back to base funding [16,054] MISCELLANEOUS 25 AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES 0 5,261 Transfer back to base funding [5,261] 26 NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES 0 715 Transfer back to base funding [715] 27 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO) 0 9,213 Transfer back to base funding [9,213] 28 AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT 0 10,044 Transfer back to base funding [10,044] 29 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO) 0 18,492 Transfer back to base funding [18,492] 30 CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES 0 99 Transfer back to base funding [99] PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT 31 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 0 474,511 Transfer back to base funding [474,511] 32 CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION 0 202,512 Transfer back to base funding [202,512] 33 ARMS INITIATIVE 0 3,833 Transfer back to base funding [3,833] TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY 0 2,694,548 OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY TACTICAL VEHICLES 1 TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS 12,993 12,993 2 SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED: 102,386 102,386 3 AMBULANCE, 4 LITTER, 5/4 TON, 4X4 127,271 127,271 4 GROUND MOBILITY VEHICLES (GMV) 37,038 37,038 6 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE 996,007 956,507 Army requested realignment [–4,500] Early to need [–35,000] 7 TRUCK, DUMP, 20T (CCE) 10,838 10,838 8 FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) 72,057 72,057 9 FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIP 28,048 28,048 10 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) 9,969 9,969 11 PLS ESP 6,280 6,280 12 HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV 30,841 30,841 13 HMMWV RECAPITALIZATION PROGRAM 5,734 5,734 14 TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS 45,113 45,113 15 MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP 58,946 58,946 NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES 17 HEAVY ARMORED VEHICLE 791 791 18 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 1,416 1,416 19 NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER 29,891 29,891 COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS 21 SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 153,933 153,933 22 TACTICAL NETWORK TECHNOLOGY MOD IN SVC 387,439 387,439 23 SITUATION INFORMATION TRANSPORT 46,693 46,693 25 JCSE EQUIPMENT (USRDECOM) 5,075 5,075 COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 28 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS 101,189 101,189 29 TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS 77,141 77,141 30 SHF TERM 16,054 16,054 31 ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING 41,074 41,074 32 SMART-T (SPACE) 10,515 10,515 33 GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS 11,800 11,800 34 ENROUTE MISSION COMMAND (EMC) 8,609 8,609 COMM—C3 SYSTEM 38 COE TACTICAL SERVER INFRASTRUCTURE (TSI) 77,533 77,533 COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 39 HANDHELD MANPACK SMALL FORM FIT (HMS) 468,026 468,026 40 RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2) 23,778 23,778 44 SPIDER FAMILY OF NETWORKED MUNITIONS INCR 10,930 10,930 46 UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE 9,291 9,291 47 COTS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 55,630 55,630 48 FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE 16,590 16,590 49 ARMY COMMUNICATIONS & ELECTRONICS 43,457 43,457 COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM 51 CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE (MIP) 10,470 10,470 52 DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION INITIATIVE 3,704 3,704 INFORMATION SECURITY 53 FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS 1,000 1,000 54 INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP 3,600 3,600 55 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC) 160,899 160,899 56 DEFENSIVE CYBER OPERATIONS 61,962 61,962 57 INSIDER THREAT PROGRAM—UNIT ACTIVITY MONITO 756 756 58 PERSISTENT CYBER TRAINING ENVIRONMENT 3,000 3,000 COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS 59 BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS 31,770 31,770 COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS 60 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 159,009 159,009 61 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 4,854 4,854 62 HOME STATION MISSION COMMAND CENTERS (HSMCC) 47,174 47,174 63 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM 297,994 297,994 ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 66 JTT/CIBS-M (MIP) 7,686 7,686 68 DCGS-A (MIP) 180,350 180,350 70 TROJAN (MIP) 17,368 17,368 71 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) 59,052 59,052 ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 77 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR 5,400 5,400 78 EW PLANNING & MANAGEMENT TOOLS (EWPMT) 7,568 7,568 79 AIR VIGILANCE (AV) (MIP) 8,953 8,953 81 MULTI-FUNCTION ELECTRONIC WARFARE (MFEW) SYST 6,420 6,420 83 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES 501 501 84 CI MODERNIZATION (MIP) 121 121 ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) 85 SENTINEL MODS 115,210 115,210 86 NIGHT VISION DEVICES 236,604 236,604 88 SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF 22,623 22,623 90 INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS 29,127 29,127 91 FAMILY OF WEAPON SIGHTS (FWS) 120,883 120,883 94 JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P) 265,667 265,667 95 JOINT EFFECTS TARGETING SYSTEM (JETS) 69,720 69,720 96 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR) 6,044 6,044 97 COMPUTER BALLISTICS: LHMBC XM32 3,268 3,268 98 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM 13,199 13,199 99 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEMS MODIFICATIONS 10,000 10,000 100 COUNTERFIRE RADARS 16,416 78,916 UPL Retrofits systems with GaN tech for ER [62,500] ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS 102 FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY 13,197 13,197 103 AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS 24,730 24,730 104 IAMD BATTLE COMMAND SYSTEM 29,629 29,629 105 LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS) 6,774 6,774 106 NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE 24,448 24,448 107 MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS) 260 260 108 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A) 17,962 17,962 109 INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPP 18,674 0 Poor business process reengineering [–18,674] 110 RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET 11,000 11,000 111 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (ENFIRE) 7,317 7,317 ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION 112 ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION 14,578 14,578 113 AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP 139,342 147,342 JIOCEUR at RAF Molesworth [8,000] 114 GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEMS FAM 15,802 15,802 115 HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PGM (HPCMP) 67,610 67,610 116 CONTRACT WRITING SYSTEM 15,000 0 Program duplication [–15,000] 117 CSS COMMUNICATIONS 24,700 24,700 118 RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS) 27,879 27,879 ELECT EQUIP—AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V) 120 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT) 5,000 5,000 ELECT EQUIP—SUPPORT 122 BCT EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES 22,302 22,302 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 3,710 11,910 Transfer back to base funding [8,200] CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT 126 CBRN DEFENSE 25,828 25,828 127 SMOKE & OBSCURANT FAMILY: SOF (NON AAO ITEM) 5,050 5,050 BRIDGING EQUIPMENT 128 TACTICAL BRIDGING 59,821 59,821 129 TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON 57,661 57,661 130 BRIDGE SUPPLEMENTAL SET 17,966 17,966 131 COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER (CBT) RECAP 43,155 43,155 ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT 132 HANDHELD STANDOFF MINEFIELD DETECTION SYS-HST 7,570 7,570 133 GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS) 37,025 37,025 135 HUSKY MOUNTED DETECTION SYSTEM (HMDS) 83,082 83,082 136 ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS) 2,000 2,000 137 EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION 23,115 23,115 138 ROBOTICS AND APPLIQUE SYSTEMS 101,056 113,856 Army requested realignment [12,800] 140 RENDER SAFE SETS KITS OUTFITS 18,684 18,684 142 FAMILY OF BOATS AND MOTORS 8,245 8,245 COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 143 HEATERS AND ECU'S 7,336 7,336 145 PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) 4,281 4,281 146 GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM 111,955 111,955 147 MOBILE SOLDIER POWER 31,364 31,364 149 FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT 1,673 1,673 150 CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM 43,622 43,622 151 FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS 11,451 11,451 152 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT) 5,167 5,167 PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT 154 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER 74,867 74,867 MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 155 COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL 68,225 68,225 MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 156 MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS 55,053 55,053 157 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ) 5,608 5,608 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 161 HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR 500 500 162 TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED 4,835 4,835 163 ALL TERRAIN CRANES 23,936 23,936 164 HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR (HMEE) 27,188 27,188 166 CONST EQUIP ESP 34,790 34,790 167 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP) 4,381 4,381 RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT 168 ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP 35,194 35,194 169 MANEUVER SUPPORT VESSEL (MSV) 14,185 14,185 170 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL) 6,920 6,920 GENERATORS 171 GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP 58,566 58,566 172 TACTICAL ELECTRIC POWER RECAPITALIZATION 14,814 14,814 MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT 173 FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS 14,864 14,864 TRAINING EQUIPMENT 174 COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT 123,411 123,411 175 TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM 220,707 220,707 176 SYNTHETIC TRAINING ENVIRONMENT (STE) 20,749 20,749 178 AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER 4,840 4,840 179 GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING 15,463 15,463 TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD) 180 CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT 3,030 3,030 181 INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE) 76,980 76,980 182 TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD) 16,415 16,415 OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 184 RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 9,877 9,877 185 PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) 82,158 82,158 186 BASE LEVEL COMMON EQUIPMENT 15,340 15,340 187 MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3) 50,458 50,458 189 BUILDING, PRE-FAB, RELOCATABLE 14,400 14,400 190 SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING 9,821 9,821 OPA2 192 INITIAL SPARES—C&E 9,757 9,757 TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY 7,443,101 7,461,427 AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY COMBAT AIRCRAFT 1 F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET 1,748,934 1,748,934 2 F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET AP 55,128 55,128 3 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV 2,272,301 2,487,301 UPL USMC additional quantities [215,000] 4 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV AP 339,053 339,053 5 JSF STOVL 1,342,035 1,591,135 UPL USMC additional quantities [249,100] 6 JSF STOVL AP 291,804 291,804 7 CH–53K (HEAVY LIFT) 807,876 807,876 8 CH–53K (HEAVY LIFT) AP 215,014 215,014 9 V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) 966,666 966,666 10 V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) AP 27,104 27,104 11 H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z) 62,003 62,003 13 MH–60R (MYP) 894 894 14 P–8A POSEIDON 1,206,701 1,206,701 16 E–2D ADV HAWKEYE 744,484 744,484 17 E–2D ADV HAWKEYE AP 190,204 190,204 TRAINER AIRCRAFT 19 ADVANCED HELICOPTER TRAINING SYSTEM 261,160 261,160 OTHER AIRCRAFT 20 KC–130J 240,840 240,840 21 KC–130J AP 66,061 66,061 22 F–5 39,676 0 Program cancellation [–39,676] 23 MQ–4 TRITON 473,134 473,134 24 MQ–4 TRITON AP 20,139 20,139 25 MQ–8 UAV 44,957 44,957 26 STUASL0 UAV 43,819 43,819 28 VH–92A EXECUTIVE HELO 658,067 658,067 MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 29 AEA SYSTEMS 44,470 44,470 30 AV–8 SERIES 39,472 39,472 31 ADVERSARY 3,415 3,415 32 F–18 SERIES 1,207,089 1,207,089 33 H–53 SERIES 68,385 68,385 34 MH–60 SERIES 149,797 149,797 35 H–1 SERIES 114,059 114,059 36 EP–3 SERIES 8,655 8,655 38 E–2 SERIES 117,059 117,059 39 TRAINER A/C SERIES 5,616 5,616 40 C–2A 15,747 15,747 41 C–130 SERIES 122,671 122,671 42 FEWSG 509 509 43 CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES 8,767 8,767 44 E–6 SERIES 169,827 169,827 45 EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES 8,933 8,933 47 T–45 SERIES 186,022 186,022 48 POWER PLANT CHANGES 16,136 16,136 49 JPATS SERIES 21,824 21,824 50 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODS 39,762 39,762 51 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT 162,839 162,839 52 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES 102,107 102,107 53 COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM 2,100 2,100 54 ID SYSTEMS 41,437 41,437 55 P–8 SERIES 107,539 107,539 56 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION 26,536 26,536 57 MQ–8 SERIES 34,686 34,686 58 V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY 325,367 325,367 59 NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) 6,223 6,223 60 F–35 STOVL SERIES 65,585 65,585 61 F–35 CV SERIES 15,358 15,358 62 QRC 165,016 165,016 63 MQ–4 SERIES 27,994 27,994 64 RQ–21 SERIES 66,282 66,282 AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 67 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 2,166,788 2,235,088 F–35B spares [14,900] F–35C spares [24,600] UPL F–35B engine [28,800] AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES 68 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT 491,025 491,025 69 AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 71,335 71,335 70 WAR CONSUMABLES 41,086 41,086 72 SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 135,740 135,740 73 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 892 892 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY 18,522,204 19,014,928 WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 1 TRIDENT II MODS 0 1,177,251 Transfer back to base funding [1,177,251] SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 2 MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 0 7,142 Transfer back to base funding [7,142] STRATEGIC MISSILES 3 TOMAHAWK 0 330,430 Transfer back to base funding [386,730] Unjustified tooling and facilitization costs [–56,300] TACTICAL MISSILES 4 AMRAAM 0 224,502 Transfer back to base funding [224,502] 5 SIDEWINDER 0 119,456 Transfer back to base funding [119,456] 7 STANDARD MISSILE 0 404,523 Transfer back to base funding [404,523] 8 STANDARD MISSILE AP 0 96,085 Transfer back to base funding [96,085] 9 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB II 0 118,466 Transfer back to base funding [118,466] 10 RAM 0 106,765 Transfer back to base funding [106,765] 12 HELLFIRE 0 1,525 Transfer back to base funding [1,525] 15 AERIAL TARGETS 0 145,880 Transfer back to base funding [145,880] 16 DRONES AND DECOYS 0 20,000 Transfer back to base funding [20,000] 17 OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT 0 3,388 Transfer back to base funding [3,388] 18 LRASM 0 143,200 Transfer back to base funding [143,200] 19 LCS OTH MISSILE 0 18,137 Transfer back to base funding [38,137] Unjustified accelerated acquisition strategy [–20,000] MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 20 ESSM 0 128,059 Transfer back to base funding [128,059] 21 HARPOON MODS 0 25,447 Transfer back to base funding [25,447] 22 HARM MODS 0 183,740 Transfer back to base funding [183,740] 23 STANDARD MISSILES MODS 0 22,500 Transfer back to base funding [22,500] SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 24 WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 0 1,958 Transfer back to base funding [1,958] 25 FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON 0 67,380 Transfer back to base funding [67,380] ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 27 ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 0 109,427 Transfer back to base funding [109,427] TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 28 SSTD 0 5,561 Transfer back to base funding [5,561] 29 MK–48 TORPEDO 0 130,000 Transfer back to base funding [114,000] UPL additional quantites [16,000] 30 ASW TARGETS 0 15,095 Transfer back to base funding [15,095] MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 31 MK–54 TORPEDO MODS 0 119,453 Transfer back to base funding [119,453] 32 MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS 0 39,508 Transfer back to base funding [39,508] 33 QUICKSTRIKE MINE 0 5,183 Transfer back to base funding [5,183] SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 34 TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 0 79,028 Transfer back to base funding [79,028] 35 ASW RANGE SUPPORT 0 3,890 Transfer back to base funding [3,890] DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 36 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 0 3,803 Transfer back to base funding [3,803] GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 37 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS 0 14,797 Transfer back to base funding [14,797] MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 38 CIWS MODS 0 44,126 Transfer back to base funding [44,126] 39 COAST GUARD WEAPONS 0 44,980 Transfer back to base funding [44,980] 40 GUN MOUNT MODS 0 66,376 Transfer back to base funding [66,376] 41 LCS MODULE WEAPONS 0 14,585 Transfer back to base funding [14,585] 43 AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS 0 7,160 Transfer back to base funding [7,160] SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 45 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 0 126,138 Transfer back to base funding [126,138] TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY 0 4,174,944 PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC NAVY AMMUNITION 1 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 0 36,028 Transfer back to base funding [36,028] 2 JDAM 0 70,413 Transfer back to base funding [70,413] 3 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES 0 31,756 Transfer back to base funding [31,756] 4 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION 0 4,793 Transfer back to base funding [4,793] 5 PRACTICE BOMBS 0 34,708 Transfer back to base funding [34,708] 6 CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES 0 45,738 Transfer back to base funding [45,738] 7 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES 0 77,301 Transfer back to base funding [77,301] 8 JATOS 0 7,262 Transfer back to base funding [7,262] 9 5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION 0 22,594 Transfer back to base funding [22,594] 10 INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION 0 37,193 Transfer back to base funding [37,193] 11 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION 0 39,491 Transfer back to base funding [39,491] 12 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO 0 47,896 Transfer back to base funding [47,896] 13 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION 0 10,621 Transfer back to base funding [10,621] 15 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION 0 2,386 Transfer back to base funding [2,386] MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION 16 MORTARS 0 55,543 Transfer back to base funding [55,543] 17 DIRECT SUPPORT MUNITIONS 0 131,765 Transfer back to base funding [131,765] 18 INFANTRY WEAPONS AMMUNITION 0 78,056 Transfer back to base funding [78,056] 19 COMBAT SUPPORT MUNITIONS 0 40,048 Transfer back to base funding [40,048] 20 AMMO MODERNIZATION 0 14,325 Transfer back to base funding [14,325] 21 ARTILLERY MUNITIONS 0 188,876 Transfer back to base funding [188,876] 22 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 0 4,521 Transfer back to base funding [4,521] TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC 0 981,314 SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE SHIPS 1 OHIO REPLACEMENT SUBMARINE AP 1,698,907 1,823,907 Submarine industrial base expansion [125,000] OTHER WARSHIPS 2 CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 2,347,000 2,347,000 3 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE 7,155,946 4,691,946 Restore VPM on SSN–804 [522,100] SSN–812 full funding early to need [–2,986,100] 4 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE AP 2,769,552 4,269,552 Future Virginia-class submarine(s) with VPM [1,500,000] 5 CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS 647,926 597,926 CVN–74 RCOH unjustified cost growth [–50,000] 6 CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS AP 0 16,900 Restore CVN–75 RCOH [16,900] 7 DDG 1000 155,944 155,944 8 DDG–51 5,099,295 5,079,295 Available prior year funds [–20,000] 9 DDG–51 AP 224,028 484,028 Accelerate LLTM for FY21 Flight III destroyers [260,000] 11 FFG-FRIGATE 1,281,177 1,281,177 AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS 12 LPD FLIGHT II 0 525,000 LPD–31 program increase [277,900] Transfer from SCN line 13 [247,100] 13 LPD FLIGHT II AP 247,100 0 Transfer to SCN line 12 [–247,100] 15 LHA REPLACEMENT 0 650,000 LHA–9 program increase [650,000] AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST 18 TAO FLEET OILER 981,215 981,215 19 TAO FLEET OILER AP 73,000 73,000 20 TOWING, SALVAGE, AND RESCUE SHIP (ATS) 150,282 150,282 22 LCU 1700 85,670 85,670 23 OUTFITTING 754,679 704,679 Early to need and unjustified cost growth [–50,000] 25 SERVICE CRAFT 56,289 81,789 Accelerate YP–703 Flight II [25,500] 28 COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS 55,700 104,700 UPL EPF–14 conversion [49,000] 29 SHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR AP 0 40,400 Program increase [40,400] TOTAL SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY 23,783,710 24,144,410 OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT 1 SURFACE POWER EQUIPMENT 14,490 14,490 GENERATORS 2 SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E 31,583 50,583 UPL DDG–51 class HM&E upgrades [19,000] NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT 3 OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT 77,404 77,404 OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT 4 SUB PERISCOPE, IMAGING AND SUPT EQUIP PROG 160,803 160,803 5 DDG MOD 566,140 566,140 6 FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT 18,223 18,223 7 COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD 2,086 2,086 8 LHA/LHD MIDLIFE 95,651 95,651 9 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT 23,910 23,910 10 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 44,895 44,895 11 VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 28,465 28,465 12 LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 19,426 19,426 13 SUBMARINE BATTERIES 26,290 26,290 14 LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 46,945 46,945 15 DDG 1000 CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 9,930 9,930 16 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP 14,331 14,331 17 DSSP EQUIPMENT 2,909 2,909 18 CG MODERNIZATION 193,990 193,990 19 LCAC 3,392 3,392 20 UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS 71,240 82,240 Program increase for four ExMCM companies [11,000] 21 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 102,543 102,543 22 CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS 2,961 2,961 23 SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM 6,635 6,635 REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT 24 REACTOR POWER UNITS 5,340 5,340 25 REACTOR COMPONENTS 465,726 465,726 OCEAN ENGINEERING 26 DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT 11,854 11,854 SMALL BOATS 27 STANDARD BOATS 79,102 79,102 PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT 28 OPERATING FORCES IPE 202,238 202,238 OTHER SHIP SUPPORT 29 LCS COMMON MISSION MODULES EQUIPMENT 51,553 51,553 30 LCS MCM MISSION MODULES 197,129 67,329 Procurement ahead of satisfactory testing [–129,800] 31 LCS ASW MISSION MODULES 27,754 27,754 32 LCS SUW MISSION MODULES 26,566 26,566 33 LCS IN-SERVICE MODERNIZATION 84,972 84,972 34 SMALL & MEDIUM UUV 40,547 10,647 Knifefish procurement ahead of satisfactory testing [–29,900] LOGISTIC SUPPORT 35 LSD MIDLIFE & MODERNIZATION 40,269 40,269 SHIP SONARS 36 SPQ–9B RADAR 26,195 26,195 37 AN/SQQ–89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM 125,237 125,237 38 SSN ACOUSTIC EQUIPMENT 366,968 366,968 39 UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 8,967 8,967 ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 40 SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM 23,545 23,545 41 SSTD 12,439 12,439 42 FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM 128,441 128,441 43 SURTASS 21,923 21,923 ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT 44 AN/SLQ–32 420,154 358,154 Early to need [–62,000] RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT 45 SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT 194,758 202,758 UPL SSEE expansion on Flight I DDGs [8,000] 46 AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS) 5,368 5,368 OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 47 COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY 35,128 35,128 48 NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS) 15,154 15,154 49 ATDLS 52,753 52,753 50 NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS) 3,390 3,390 51 MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT 19,448 19,448 52 SHALLOW WATER MCM 8,730 8,730 53 NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE) 32,674 32,674 54 AMERICAN FORCES RADIO AND TV SERVICE 2,617 2,617 55 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP 7,973 7,973 AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 56 ASHORE ATC EQUIPMENT 72,406 72,406 57 AFLOAT ATC EQUIPMENT 67,410 67,410 58 ID SYSTEMS 26,059 26,059 59 JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEM ( 92,695 92,695 60 NAVAL MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS 15,296 15,296 OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 61 TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS 36,226 36,226 62 DCGS-N 21,788 21,788 63 CANES 426,654 426,654 64 RADIAC 6,450 6,450 65 CANES-INTELL 52,713 52,713 66 GPETE 13,028 13,028 67 MASF 5,193 5,193 68 INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY 6,028 6,028 69 EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION 4,209 4,209 70 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 168,436 144,636 NGSSR early to need [–23,800] SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS 71 SHIPBOARD TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS 55,853 55,853 72 SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION 137,861 137,861 73 COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M 35,093 35,093 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS 74 SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT 50,833 50,833 75 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 69,643 69,643 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 76 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 45,841 45,841 77 NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT) 88,021 88,021 SHORE COMMUNICATIONS 78 JOINT COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT ELEMENT (JCSE) 4,293 4,293 CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT 79 INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) 166,540 166,540 80 MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM 968 968 CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT 81 CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP 13,090 13,090 OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT 83 COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT 61,370 61,370 SONOBUOYS 85 SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES 260,644 310,644 UPL Sonobuoy increase [50,000] AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 86 MINOTAUR 5,000 5,000 87 WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 101,843 101,843 88 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 145,601 145,601 89 ADVANCED ARRESTING GEAR (AAG) 4,725 4,725 90 METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT 14,687 14,687 92 LEGACY AIRBORNE MCM 19,250 19,250 93 LAMPS EQUIPMENT 792 792 94 AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 55,415 55,415 95 UMCS-UNMAN CARRIER AVIATION(UCA)MISSION CNTRL 32,668 32,668 SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT 96 SHIP GUN SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 5,451 5,451 SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 97 HARPOON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 1,100 1,100 98 SHIP MISSILE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 228,104 228,104 99 TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 78,593 78,593 FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 100 STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP 280,510 280,510 ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 101 SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS 148,547 148,547 102 ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 21,130 21,130 OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 103 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP 15,244 15,244 104 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 5,071 5,071 OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE 105 ANTI-SHIP MISSILE DECOY SYSTEM 41,962 41,962 106 SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS 75,057 75,057 107 SURFACE TRAINING EQUIPMENT 233,175 233,175 CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 108 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 4,562 4,562 109 GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS 10,974 10,974 110 CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP 43,191 43,191 111 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 21,142 21,142 112 TACTICAL VEHICLES 33,432 33,432 114 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT 2,633 2,633 115 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION 53,467 53,467 116 PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES 1,173 1,173 SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 117 SUPPLY EQUIPMENT 16,730 16,730 118 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 5,389 5,389 119 SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS 654,674 654,674 TRAINING DEVICES 120 TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 3,633 3,633 121 TRAINING AND EDUCATION EQUIPMENT 97,636 97,636 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 122 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 66,102 59,779 Program duplication [–6,323] 123 MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 3,633 3,633 125 NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 6,097 6,097 126 OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 16,905 16,905 127 C4ISR EQUIPMENT 30,146 30,146 128 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 21,986 21,986 129 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 160,046 160,046 130 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 56,899 56,899 OTHER 133 NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE SERVICE 122,832 122,832 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 16,346 16,346 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 134 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 375,608 375,608 TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY 9,652,956 9,489,133 PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 1 AAV7A1 PIP 39,495 39,495 2 AMPHIBIOUS COMBAT VEHICLE 1.1 317,935 317,935 3 LAV PIP 60,734 60,734 ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS 4 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER 25,065 25,065 5 ARTILLERY WEAPONS SYSTEM 100,002 100,002 6 WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION 31,945 31,945 OTHER SUPPORT 7 MODIFICATION KITS 22,760 22,760 GUIDED MISSILES 8 GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE 175,998 175,998 9 ANTI-ARMOR MISSILE-JAVELIN 20,207 20,207 10 FAMILY ANTI-ARMOR WEAPON SYSTEMS (FOAAWS) 21,913 21,913 11 ANTI-ARMOR MISSILE-TOW 60,501 60,501 12 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) 29,062 29,062 COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS 13 COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (C 37,203 37,203 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 14 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 55,156 55,156 OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) 15 MODIFICATION KITS 4,945 4,945 COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) 16 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) 112,124 112,124 17 AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS 17,408 17,408 RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 18 RADAR SYSTEMS 329 329 19 GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR) 273,022 273,022 INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 21 GCSS-MC 4,484 4,484 22 FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM 35,488 35,488 23 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 56,896 56,896 25 UNMANNED AIR SYSTEMS (INTEL) 34,711 34,711 26 DCGS-MC 32,562 32,562 OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) 30 NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE NETWORK (NGEN) 114,901 114,901 31 COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES 51,094 51,094 32 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS 108,897 108,897 33 RADIO SYSTEMS 227,320 227,320 34 COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS 31,685 31,685 35 COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT 21,140 21,140 36 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 27,632 27,632 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 5,535 5,535 ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES 37 COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES 28,913 28,913 TACTICAL VEHICLES 38 MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS 19,234 19,234 39 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE 558,107 558,107 40 FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS 2,693 2,693 ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 41 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT 495 495 42 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS 52 52 43 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED 22,441 22,441 44 AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 7,101 7,101 45 EOD SYSTEMS 44,700 44,700 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 46 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 15,404 15,404 GENERAL PROPERTY 47 FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 2,898 2,898 48 TRAINING DEVICES 149,567 149,567 49 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 35,622 35,622 50 ULTRA-LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (ULTV) 647 647 OTHER SUPPORT 51 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 10,956 10,956 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 52 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 33,470 33,470 TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS 3,090,449 3,090,449 AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE TACTICAL FORCES 1 F–35 4,274,359 5,364,359 UPL additional quantities [1,090,000] 2 F–35 AP 655,500 811,500 UPL increase [156,000] 3 F–15E 1,050,000 888,000 NRE cost on a non-developmental A/C [–162,000] TACTICAL AIRLIFT 5 KC–46A MDAP 2,234,529 2,705,529 UPL additional quantities [471,000] OTHER AIRLIFT 6 C–130J 12,156 12,156 8 MC–130J 871,207 871,207 9 MC–130J AP 40,000 40,000 HELICOPTERS 10 COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER 884,235 884,235 MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT 11 C–37A 161,000 161,000 12 CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C 2,767 2,767 OTHER AIRCRAFT 14 TARGET DRONES 130,837 130,837 15 COMPASS CALL 114,095 114,095 17 MQ–9 189,205 189,205 STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT 19 B–2A 9,582 9,582 20 B–1B 22,111 22,111 21 B–52 69,648 69,648 22 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES 43,758 43,758 TACTICAL AIRCRAFT 23 A–10 132,069 132,069 24 E–11 BACN/HAG 70,027 70,027 25 F–15 481,073 328,073 ADCP unnecessary due to F–15X [–75,100] IFF unnecessary due to F–15X [–29,600] Longerons unnecessary due to F–15X [–24,600] Radar unnecessary due to F–15X [–23,700] 26 F–16 234,782 309,782 Additional radars [75,000] 28 F–22A 323,597 323,597 30 F–35 MODIFICATIONS 343,590 343,590 31 F–15 EPAW 149,047 81,847 Not required because of F–15X [–67,200] 32 INCREMENT 3.2B 20,213 20,213 33 KC–46A MDAP 10,213 10,213 AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT 34 C–5 73,550 73,550 36 C–17A 60,244 60,244 37 C–21 216 216 38 C–32A 11,511 11,511 39 C–37A 435 435 TRAINER AIRCRAFT 40 GLIDER MODS 138 138 41 T–6 11,826 11,826 42 T–1 26,787 26,787 43 T–38 37,341 37,341 OTHER AIRCRAFT 44 U–2 MODS 86,896 86,896 45 KC–10A (ATCA) 2,108 2,108 46 C–12 3,021 3,021 47 VC–25A MOD 48,624 48,624 48 C–40 256 256 49 C–130 52,066 52,066 50 C–130J MODS 141,686 141,686 51 C–135 124,491 124,491 53 COMPASS CALL 110,754 110,754 54 COMBAT FLIGHT INSPECTION—CFIN 508 508 55 RC–135 227,673 227,673 56 E–3 216,299 216,299 57 E–4 58,477 58,477 58 E–8 28,778 58,778 SATCOM radios [30,000] 59 AIRBORNE WARNING AND CNTRL SYS (AWACS) 40/45 36,000 36,000 60 FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS 7,910 7,910 61 H–1 3,817 3,817 62 H–60 20,879 20,879 63 RQ–4 MODS 1,704 1,704 64 HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS 51,482 51,482 65 OTHER AIRCRAFT 50,098 50,098 66 MQ–9 MODS 383,594 383,594 68 CV–22 MODS 65,348 65,348 AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 69 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS 708,230 970,230 F–35 spares [96,000] KC–46 spares [141,000] RQ–4 [25,000] COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 72 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP 84,938 84,938 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT 73 B–2A 1,403 1,403 74 B–2B 42,234 42,234 75 B–52 4,641 4,641 76 C–17A 124,805 124,805 79 F–15 2,589 2,589 81 F–16 15,348 15,348 84 RQ–4 POST PRODUCTION CHARGES 47,246 47,246 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS 86 INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIVENESS 17,705 17,705 WAR CONSUMABLES 87 WAR CONSUMABLES 32,102 32,102 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 88 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 1,194,728 1,194,728 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 34,193 34,193 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 16,784,279 18,486,079 MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT—BALLISTIC 1 MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC 55,888 55,888 TACTICAL 2 REPLAC EQUIP & WAR CONSUMABLES 9,100 9,100 3 JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MUNITION 15,000 15,000 4 JOINT AIR-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE 482,525 482,525 6 SIDEWINDER (AIM–9X) 160,408 160,408 7 AMRAAM 332,250 332,250 8 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE 118,860 118,860 9 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB 275,438 275,438 10 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB II 212,434 212,434 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 11 INDUSTR'L PREPAREDNS/POL PREVENTION 801 801 CLASS IV 12 ICBM FUZE MOD 5,000 5,000 13 ICBM FUZE MOD AP 14,497 14,497 14 MM III MODIFICATIONS 50,831 59,731 Air Force requested transfer [8,900] 15 AGM–65D MAVERICK 294 294 16 AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) 77,387 68,487 Air Force requested transfer [–8,900] MISSILE SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 18 MSL SPRS/REPAIR PARTS (INITIAL) 1,910 1,910 19 REPLEN SPARES/REPAIR PARTS 82,490 82,490 SPECIAL PROGRAMS 23 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS 144,553 144,553 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 849,521 849,521 TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 2,889,187 2,889,187 SPACE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE SPACE PROGRAMS 1 ADVANCED EHF 31,894 31,894 2 AF SATELLITE COMM SYSTEM 56,298 56,298 4 COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS 5,700 5,700 5 FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS 34,020 34,020 7 GENERAL INFORMATION TECH—SPACE 3,244 3,244 8 GPSIII FOLLOW ON 414,625 414,625 9 GPS III SPACE SEGMENT 31,466 31,466 12 SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC) 32,031 32,031 13 MILSATCOM 11,096 11,096 15 EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH(SPACE) 1,237,635 1,237,635 16 SBIR HIGH (SPACE) 233,952 233,952 17 NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM 7,432 7,432 18 ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM 11,473 11,473 19 SPACE FENCE 71,784 71,784 20 SPACE MODS 106,330 106,330 21 SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE 118,140 118,140 SPARES 22 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 7,263 7,263 TOTAL SPACE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 2,414,383 2,414,383 PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE ROCKETS 1 ROCKETS 0 133,268 Transfer back to base funding [133,268] CARTRIDGES 2 CARTRIDGES 0 140,449 Transfer back to base funding [140,449] BOMBS 3 PRACTICE BOMBS 0 29,313 Transfer back to base funding [29,313] 4 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 0 85,885 Transfer back to base funding [85,885] 6 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION 0 1,066,224 Transfer back to base funding [1,066,224] 7 B61 0 80,773 Transfer back to base funding [80,773] OTHER ITEMS 9 CAD/PAD 0 47,069 Transfer back to base funding [47,069] 10 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) 0 6,133 Transfer back to base funding [6,133] 11 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 0 533 Transfer back to base funding [533] 12 MODIFICATIONS 0 1,291 Transfer back to base funding [1,291] 13 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 0 1,677 Transfer back to base funding [1,677] FLARES 15 FLARES 0 36,116 Transfer back to base funding [36,116] FUZES 16 FUZES 0 1,734 Transfer back to base funding [1,734] SMALL ARMS 17 SMALL ARMS 0 37,496 Transfer back to base funding [37,496] TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE 0 1,667,961 OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 1 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 15,238 15,238 CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES 2 MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE 34,616 34,616 3 CAP VEHICLES 1,040 1,040 4 CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES 23,133 23,133 SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 5 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE 32,027 32,027 6 SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES 1,315 1,315 7 SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 14,593 14,593 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 8 FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES 28,604 28,604 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 9 MATERIALS HANDLING VEHICLES 21,848 21,848 BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 10 RUNWAY SNOW REMOV AND CLEANING EQU 2,925 2,925 11 BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT VEHICLES 55,776 55,776 COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC) 13 COMSEC EQUIPMENT 91,461 91,461 INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS 14 INTERNATIONAL INTEL TECH & ARCHITECTURES 11,386 11,386 15 INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT 7,619 7,619 16 INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT 35,558 35,558 ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS 17 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYS 17,939 17,939 19 BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM—FIXED 3,063 3,063 21 WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST 31,447 31,447 22 STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL 5,090 5,090 23 CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX 10,145 10,145 24 MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS 14,508 14,508 26 INTEGRATED STRAT PLAN & ANALY NETWORK (ISPAN) 9,901 9,901 SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS 27 GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 26,933 26,933 28 AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYS 2,756 2,756 29 BATTLEFIELD AIRBORNE CONTROL NODE (BACN) 48,478 48,478 30 MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL 21,186 21,186 31 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM 178,361 178,361 32 COMBAT TRAINING RANGES 233,993 261,993 Joint threat emitters [28,000] 33 MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMM N 132,648 132,648 34 WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE (WAS) 80,818 80,818 35 C3 COUNTERMEASURES 25,036 25,036 36 INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM 20,900 0 Poor agile implementation [–20,900] 37 GCSS-AF FOS 11,226 11,226 38 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE ACCOUNTING & MGT SYS 1,905 1,905 39 MAINTENANCE REPAIR & OVERHAUL INITIATIVE 1,912 1,912 40 THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYSTEM 6,337 6,337 41 AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) 33,243 33,243 AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS 43 BASE INFORMATION TRANSPT INFRAST (BITI) WIRED 69,530 69,530 44 AFNET 147,063 147,063 45 JOINT COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT ELEMENT (JCSE) 6,505 6,505 46 USCENTCOM 20,190 20,190 47 USSTRATCOM 11,244 11,244 ORGANIZATION AND BASE 48 TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT 143,757 143,757 50 RADIO EQUIPMENT 15,402 15,402 51 CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT 3,211 3,211 52 BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE 43,123 43,123 MODIFICATIONS 53 COMM ELECT MODS 14,500 14,500 PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP 54 PERSONAL SAFETY AND RESCUE EQUIPMENT 50,634 50,634 DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS HANDLING EQ 55 POWER CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT 11,000 11,000 56 MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP 11,901 11,901 BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 57 BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT 23,963 23,963 58 ENGINEERING AND EOD EQUIPMENT 34,124 34,124 59 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT 26,439 26,439 60 FUELS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (FSE) 24,255 24,255 61 BASE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 38,986 38,986 SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS 63 DARP RC135 26,716 26,716 64 DCGS-AF 116,055 116,055 66 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM 835,148 835,148 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 17,637,807 18,292,807 Transfer back to base funding [655,000] SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 67 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 81,340 81,340 TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 20,687,857 21,349,957 PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA 2 MAJOR EQUIPMENT 2,432 2,432 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA 3 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 5,030 5,030 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 8 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY 3,318 4,718 Sharkseer transfer [1,400] 9 TELEPORT PROGRAM 25,103 25,103 10 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 26,416 26,416 12 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK 17,574 17,574 14 WHITE HOUSE COMMUNICATION AGENCY 45,079 45,079 15 SENIOR LEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE 78,669 78,669 16 JOINT REGIONAL SECURITY STACKS (JRSS) 88,000 88,000 17 JOINT SERVICE PROVIDER 107,907 107,907 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA 19 MAJOR EQUIPMENT 8,122 8,122 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT 20 MAJOR EQUIPMENT 10,961 10,961 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA 21 AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS 1,320 1,320 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DPAA 22 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DPAA 1,504 1,504 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS 23 MAJOR EQUIPMENT 496 496 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY 25 VEHICLES 211 211 26 OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT 11,521 11,521 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY 28 THAAD 425,863 0 THAAD program transfer to Army [–425,863] 29 GROUND BASED MIDCOURSE 9,471 9,471 31 AEGIS BMD 600,773 600,773 32 AEGIS BMD AP 96,995 96,995 33 BMDS AN/TPY–2 RADARS 10,046 10,046 34 ARROW 3 UPPER TIER SYSTEMS 55,000 55,000 35 SHORT RANGE BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE (SRBMD) 50,000 50,000 36 AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III 25,659 25,659 37 IRON DOME 95,000 95,000 38 AEGIS BMD HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE 124,986 124,986 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA 44 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) 1,533 133 Sharkseer transfer [–1,400] MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD 45 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD 43,705 43,705 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS 46 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS 6,905 6,905 47 MAJOR EQUIPMENT—TJS CYBER 1,458 1,458 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS 49 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS 507 507 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 584,366 589,366 Transfer back to base funding [5,000] AVIATION PROGRAMS 53 ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT 172,020 172,020 54 UNMANNED ISR 15,208 15,208 55 NON-STANDARD AVIATION 32,310 32,310 56 U–28 10,898 10,898 57 MH–47 CHINOOK 173,812 173,812 58 CV–22 MODIFICATION 17,256 17,256 59 MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE 5,338 5,338 60 PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE 232,930 232,930 61 AC/MC–130J 173,419 164,619 RFCM schedule delay [–8,800] 62 C–130 MODIFICATIONS 15,582 15,582 SHIPBUILDING 63 UNDERWATER SYSTEMS 58,991 58,991 AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 64 ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M 279,992 279,992 OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 65 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS 100,641 100,641 66 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 12,522 12,522 67 OTHER ITEMS <$5M 103,910 103,910 68 COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS 33,088 33,088 69 SPECIAL PROGRAMS 63,467 63,467 70 TACTICAL VEHICLES 77,832 77,832 71 WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M 298,480 298,480 72 COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS 19,702 19,702 73 GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES 4,787 4,787 74 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE 8,175 8,175 75 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS 282,532 282,532 CBDP 76 CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL SITUATIONAL AWARENESS 162,406 162,406 77 CB PROTECTION & HAZARD MITIGATION 188,188 188,188 TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE 5,109,416 4,679,753 JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 1 JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 99,200 99,200 TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 99,200 99,200 TOTAL PROCUREMENT 118,888,737 135,071,365 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS Line Item FY 2020 Senate AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY FIXED WING 3 MQ–1 UAV 54,000 54,000 ROTARY 15 CH–47 HELICOPTER 25,000 25,000 MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 21 MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) 80,260 80,260 24 GRCS SEMA MODS (MIP) 750 750 26 EMARSS SEMA MODS (MIP) 22,180 22,180 27 UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS 8,362 8,362 29 NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN 10 10 31 DEGRADED VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 49,450 49,450 GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS 37 CMWS 130,219 130,219 38 COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) 9,310 9,310 OTHER SUPPORT 45 LAUNCHER GUIDED MISSILE: LONGBOW HELLFIRE XM2 2,000 2,000 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY 381,541 381,541 MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM 1 SYSTEM INTEGRATION AND TEST PROCUREMENT 113,857 0 Transfer back to base funding [–113,857] 2 M-SHORAD—PROCUREMENT 262,100 158,300 Transfer back to base funding [–103,800] 3 MSE MISSILE 736,541 37,938 Transfer back to base funding [–698,603] 4 INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INC 2–I 9,337 0 Transfer back to base funding [–9,337] AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 6 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY 429,549 236,265 Transfer back to base funding [–193,284] 7 JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MSLS (JAGM) 233,353 0 Transfer back to base funding [–233,353] ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS 8 JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY 142,794 4,389 Transfer back to base funding [–138,405] 9 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY 114,340 0 Transfer back to base funding [–114,340] 10 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY AP 10,500 0 Transfer back to base funding [–10,500] 11 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) 1,228,809 431,596 Transfer back to base funding [–797,213] 12 MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR) 27,555 0 Transfer back to base funding [–27,555] 14 ARMY TACTICAL MSL SYS (ATACMS)—SYS SUM 340,612 130,770 Transfer back to base funding [–209,842] 15 LETHAL MINIATURE AERIAL MISSILE SYSTEM (LMAMS 83,300 83,300 MODIFICATIONS 16 PATRIOT MODS 279,464 0 Transfer back to base funding [–279,464] 17 ATACMS MODS 85,320 0 Transfer back to base funding [–85,320] 18 GMLRS MOD 5,094 0 Transfer back to base funding [–5,094] 19 STINGER MODS 89,115 7,500 Transfer back to base funding [–81,615] 20 AVENGER MODS 14,107 0 Transfer back to base funding [–14,107] 21 ITAS/TOW MODS 3,469 0 Transfer back to base funding [–3,469] 22 MLRS MODS 387,019 348,000 Transfer back to base funding [–39,019] 23 HIMARS MODIFICATIONS 12,483 0 Transfer back to base funding [–12,483] SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 24 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 26,444 0 Transfer back to base funding [–26,444] SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 25 AIR DEFENSE TARGETS 10,593 0 Transfer back to base funding [–10,593] TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY 4,645,755 1,438,058 PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 2 ARMORED MULTI PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV) 221,638 221,638 MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 3 STRYKER (MOD) 4,100 4,100 8 IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES) 80,146 80,146 13 M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD) 13,100 13,100 WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES 15 M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN (7.62MM) 900 900 16 MULTI-ROLE ANTI-ARMOR ANTI-PERSONNEL WEAPON S 2,400 2,400 19 MORTAR SYSTEMS 18,941 18,941 20 XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM) 526 526 23 CARBINE 1,183 1,183 25 COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION 4,182 4,182 26 HANDGUN 248 248 MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH 31 M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS 6,090 6,090 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY 353,454 353,454 PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 1 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES 69,516 567 Transfer back to base funding [–68,949] 2 CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES 114,268 40 Transfer back to base funding [–114,228] 3 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES 17,824 17 Transfer back to base funding [–17,807] 4 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES 64,155 189 Transfer back to base funding [–63,966] 5 CTG, 20MM, ALL TYPES 35,920 0 Transfer back to base funding [–35,920] 6 CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES 8,990 0 Transfer back to base funding [–8,990] 7 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES 93,713 24,900 Transfer back to base funding [–68,813] 8 CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES 103,952 0 Transfer back to base funding [–103,952] MORTAR AMMUNITION 9 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES 50,580 0 Transfer back to base funding [–50,580] 10 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES 59,373 0 Transfer back to base funding [–59,373] 11 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES 125,452 0 Transfer back to base funding [–125,452] TANK AMMUNITION 12 CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES 171,284 0 Transfer back to base funding [–171,284] ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 13 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES 44,675 0 Transfer back to base funding [–44,675] 14 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES 266,037 0 Transfer back to base funding [–266,037] 15 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982 93,486 36,052 Transfer back to base funding [–57,434] 16 ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL 278,873 7,271 Transfer back to base funding [–271,602] MINES 17 MINES & CLEARING CHARGES, ALL TYPES 55,433 0 Transfer back to base funding [–55,433] ROCKETS 18 SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES 75,054 176 Transfer back to base funding [–74,878] 19 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES 255,453 79,459 Transfer back to base funding [–175,994] OTHER AMMUNITION 20 CAD/PAD, ALL TYPES 7,595 0 Transfer back to base funding [–7,595] 21 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES 51,651 0 Transfer back to base funding [–51,651] 22 GRENADES, ALL TYPES 40,592 0 Transfer back to base funding [–40,592] 23 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES 18,609 0 Transfer back to base funding [–18,609] 24 SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES 16,054 0 Transfer back to base funding [–16,054] MISCELLANEOUS 25 AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES 5,261 0 Transfer back to base funding [–5,261] 26 NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES 715 0 Transfer back to base funding [–715] 27 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO) 9,224 11 Transfer back to base funding [–9,213] 28 AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT 10,044 0 Transfer back to base funding [–10,044] 29 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO) 18,492 0 Transfer back to base funding [–18,492] 30 CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES 99 0 Transfer back to base funding [–99] PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT 31 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 474,511 0 Transfer back to base funding [–474,511] 32 CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION 202,512 0 Transfer back to base funding [–202,512] 33 ARMS INITIATIVE 3,833 0 Transfer back to base funding [–3,833] TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY 2,843,230 148,682 OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY TACTICAL VEHICLES 10 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) 26,917 26,917 11 PLS ESP 16,941 16,941 12 HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV 62,734 62,734 14 TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS 50,000 50,000 15 MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP 28,000 28,000 COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS 22 TACTICAL NETWORK TECHNOLOGY MOD IN SVC 40,000 40,000 COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 29 TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS 6,930 6,930 31 ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING 11,778 11,778 32 SMART-T (SPACE) 825 825 COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 40 RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2) 350 350 47 COTS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 20,400 20,400 48 FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE 1,231 1,231 COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM 51 CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE (MIP) 6,200 6,200 COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS 59 BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS 20,482 20,482 COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS 60 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 55,800 55,800 63 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM 75,820 75,820 ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 68 DCGS-A (MIP) 38,613 38,613 70 TROJAN (MIP) 1,337 1,337 71 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) 2,051 2,051 75 BIOMETRIC TACTICAL COLLECTION DEVICES (MIP) 1,800 1,800 ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 82 FAMILY OF PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE CAP. (MIP) 71,493 71,493 83 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES 6,917 6,917 ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) 85 SENTINEL MODS 20,000 20,000 86 NIGHT VISION DEVICES 3,676 3,676 94 JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P) 25,568 25,568 97 COMPUTER BALLISTICS: LHMBC XM32 570 570 98 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM 15,975 15,975 ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS 103 AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS 14,331 14,331 ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION 112 ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION 6,014 6,014 113 AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP 32,700 32,700 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 8,200 0 Transfer back to base funding [–8,200] CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT 124 FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) 25,480 25,480 125 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) 47,110 47,110 126 CBRN DEFENSE 18,711 18,711 BRIDGING EQUIPMENT 128 TACTICAL BRIDGING 4,884 4,884 ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT 133 GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS) 4,500 4,500 135 HUSKY MOUNTED DETECTION SYSTEM (HMDS) 34,253 34,253 136 ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS) 3,300 3,300 140 RENDER SAFE SETS KITS OUTFITS 84,000 84,000 COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 143 HEATERS AND ECU'S 8 8 145 PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) 5,101 5,101 146 GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM 1,760 1,760 148 FORCE PROVIDER 56,400 56,400 150 CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM 2,040 2,040 PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT 154 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER 13,986 13,986 MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 155 COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL 2,735 2,735 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 159 SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING 4,669 4,669 160 LOADERS 380 380 162 TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED 8,225 8,225 164 HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR (HMEE) 3,000 3,000 166 CONST EQUIP ESP 3,870 3,870 167 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP) 350 350 GENERATORS 171 GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP 2,436 2,436 MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT 173 FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS 5,152 5,152 TRAINING EQUIPMENT 175 TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM 2,106 2,106 TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD) 181 INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE) 1,395 1,395 OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 184 RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 24,122 24,122 185 PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) 10,016 10,016 187 MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3) 33,354 33,354 189 BUILDING, PRE-FAB, RELOCATABLE 62,654 62,654 TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY 1,139,650 1,131,450 AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY OTHER AIRCRAFT 26 STUASL0 UAV 7,921 7,921 27 MQ–9A REAPER 77,000 77,000 MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 36 EP–3 SERIES 5,488 5,488 46 SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT 3,498 3,498 51 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT 3,406 3,406 53 COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM 3,274 3,274 62 QRC 18,458 18,458 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY 119,045 119,045 WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 1 TRIDENT II MODS 1,177,251 0 Transfer back to base funding [–1,177,251] SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 2 MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 7,142 0 Transfer back to base funding [–7,142] STRATEGIC MISSILES 3 TOMAHAWK 386,730 0 Transfer back to base funding [–386,730] TACTICAL MISSILES 4 AMRAAM 224,502 0 Transfer back to base funding [–224,502] 5 SIDEWINDER 119,456 0 Transfer back to base funding [–119,456] 7 STANDARD MISSILE 404,523 0 Transfer back to base funding [–404,523] 8 STANDARD MISSILE AP 96,085 0 Transfer back to base funding [–96,085] 9 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB II 118,466 0 Transfer back to base funding [–118,466] 10 RAM 106,765 0 Transfer back to base funding [–106,765] 11 JOINT AIR GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) 90,966 90,966 12 HELLFIRE 1,525 0 Transfer back to base funding [–1,525] 15 AERIAL TARGETS 152,380 6,500 Transfer back to base funding [–145,880] 16 DRONES AND DECOYS 20,000 0 Transfer back to base funding [–20,000] 17 OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT 3,388 0 Transfer back to base funding [–3,388] 18 LRASM 143,200 0 Transfer back to base funding [–143,200] 19 LCS OTH MISSILE 38,137 0 Transfer back to base funding [–38,137] MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 20 ESSM 128,059 0 Transfer back to base funding [–128,059] 21 HARPOON MODS 25,447 0 Transfer back to base funding [–25,447] 22 HARM MODS 183,740 0 Transfer back to base funding [–183,740] 23 STANDARD MISSILES MODS 22,500 0 Transfer back to base funding [–22,500] SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 24 WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 1,958 0 Transfer back to base funding [–1,958] 25 FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON 67,380 0 Transfer back to base funding [–67,380] ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 27 ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 109,427 0 Transfer back to base funding [–109,427] TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 28 SSTD 5,561 0 Transfer back to base funding [–5,561] 29 MK–48 TORPEDO 114,000 0 Transfer back to base funding [–114,000] 30 ASW TARGETS 15,095 0 Transfer back to base funding [–15,095] MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 31 MK–54 TORPEDO MODS 119,453 0 Transfer back to base funding [–119,453] 32 MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS 39,508 0 Transfer back to base funding [–39,508] 33 QUICKSTRIKE MINE 5,183 0 Transfer back to base funding [–5,183] SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 34 TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 79,028 0 Transfer back to base funding [–79,028] 35 ASW RANGE SUPPORT 3,890 0 Transfer back to base funding [–3,890] DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 36 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 3,803 0 Transfer back to base funding [–3,803] GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 37 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS 14,797 0 Transfer back to base funding [–14,797] MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 38 CIWS MODS 44,126 0 Transfer back to base funding [–44,126] 39 COAST GUARD WEAPONS 44,980 0 Transfer back to base funding [–44,980] 40 GUN MOUNT MODS 66,376 0 Transfer back to base funding [–66,376] 41 LCS MODULE WEAPONS 14,585 0 Transfer back to base funding [–14,585] 43 AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS 7,160 0 Transfer back to base funding [–7,160] SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 45 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 126,138 0 Transfer back to base funding [–126,138] TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY 4,332,710 97,466 PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC NAVY AMMUNITION 1 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 63,006 26,978 Transfer back to base funding [–36,028] 2 JDAM 82,676 12,263 Transfer back to base funding [–70,413] 3 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES 76,776 45,020 Transfer back to base funding [–31,756] 4 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION 38,370 33,577 Transfer back to base funding [–4,793] 5 PRACTICE BOMBS 46,611 11,903 Transfer back to base funding [–34,708] 6 CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES 60,819 15,081 Transfer back to base funding [–45,738] 7 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES 94,212 16,911 Transfer back to base funding [–77,301] 8 JATOS 7,262 0 Transfer back to base funding [–7,262] 9 5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION 22,594 0 Transfer back to base funding [–22,594] 10 INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION 37,193 0 Transfer back to base funding [–37,193] 11 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION 42,753 3,262 Transfer back to base funding [–39,491] 12 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO 48,906 1,010 Transfer back to base funding [–47,896] 13 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION 11,158 537 Transfer back to base funding [–10,621] 15 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION 2,386 0 Transfer back to base funding [–2,386] MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION 16 MORTARS 57,473 1,930 Transfer back to base funding [–55,543] 17 DIRECT SUPPORT MUNITIONS 132,937 1,172 Transfer back to base funding [–131,765] 18 INFANTRY WEAPONS AMMUNITION 80,214 2,158 Transfer back to base funding [–78,056] 19 COMBAT SUPPORT MUNITIONS 41,013 965 Transfer back to base funding [–40,048] 20 AMMO MODERNIZATION 14,325 0 Transfer back to base funding [–14,325] 21 ARTILLERY MUNITIONS 220,923 32,047 Transfer back to base funding [–188,876] 22 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION 4,521 0 Transfer back to base funding [–4,521] TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC 1,186,128 204,814 OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT 20 UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS 5,800 5,800 ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 42 FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM 310,503 310,503 SONOBUOYS 85 SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES 2,910 2,910 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 88 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 13,420 13,420 94 AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 500 500 OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 103 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP 15,307 15,307 CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 108 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 173 173 109 GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS 408 408 111 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 785 785 SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 117 SUPPLY EQUIPMENT 100 100 118 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 510 510 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 122 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 2,800 2,800 123 MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 1,794 1,794 126 OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 1,090 1,090 128 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 200 200 129 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 1,300 1,300 TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY 357,600 357,600 PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS GUIDED MISSILES 12 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) 16,919 16,919 ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 45 EOD SYSTEMS 3,670 3,670 TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS 20,589 20,589 AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE OTHER AIRCRAFT 17 MQ–9 172,240 172,240 18 RQ–20B PUMA 12,150 12,150 STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT 22 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES 53,335 53,335 OTHER AIRCRAFT 67 MQ–9 UAS PAYLOADS 19,800 19,800 AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 69 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS 44,560 44,560 COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 72 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP 7,025 7,025 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 309,110 309,110 MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE TACTICAL 4 JOINT AIR-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE 20,900 20,900 8 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE 180,771 180,771 TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 201,671 201,671 PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE ROCKETS 1 ROCKETS 218,228 84,960 Transfer back to base funding [–133,268] CARTRIDGES 2 CARTRIDGES 193,091 52,642 Transfer back to base funding [–140,449] BOMBS 3 PRACTICE BOMBS 29,313 0 Transfer back to base funding [–29,313] 4 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 631,194 545,309 Transfer back to base funding [–85,885] 6 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION 1,066,224 0 Transfer back to base funding [–1,066,224] 7 B61 80,773 0 Transfer back to base funding [–80,773] OTHER ITEMS 9 CAD/PAD 47,069 0 Transfer back to base funding [–47,069] 10 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) 6,133 0 Transfer back to base funding [–6,133] 11 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 533 0 Transfer back to base funding [–533] 12 MODIFICATIONS 1,291 0 Transfer back to base funding [–1,291] 13 ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 1,677 0 Transfer back to base funding [–1,677] FLARES 15 FLARES 129,388 93,272 Transfer back to base funding [–36,116] FUZES 16 FUZES 158,889 157,155 Transfer back to base funding [–1,734] SMALL ARMS 17 SMALL ARMS 43,591 6,095 Transfer back to base funding [–37,496] TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE 2,607,394 939,433 OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 1 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 1,276 1,276 CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES 4 CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES 9,702 9,702 SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 5 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE 40,999 40,999 7 SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 52,502 52,502 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 8 FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES 16,652 16,652 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 9 MATERIALS HANDLING VEHICLES 2,944 2,944 BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 10 RUNWAY SNOW REMOV AND CLEANING EQU 3,753 3,753 11 BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT VEHICLES 11,837 11,837 SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS 27 GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 5,000 5,000 31 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM 106,919 106,919 ORGANIZATION AND BASE 48 TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT 306 306 52 BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE 4,300 4,300 PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP 54 PERSONAL SAFETY AND RESCUE EQUIPMENT 22,200 22,200 BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 59 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT 26,535 26,535 60 FUELS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (FSE) 4,040 4,040 61 BASE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 20,067 20,067 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 3,864,066 3,209,066 Transfer back to base funding [–655,000] TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 4,193,098 3,538,098 PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 9 TELEPORT PROGRAM 3,800 3,800 12 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK 12,000 12,000 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY 27 COUNTER IED & IMPROVISED THREAT TECHNOLOGIES 4,590 4,590 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 56,380 51,380 Transfer back to base funding [–5,000] AVIATION PROGRAMS 50 MANNED ISR 5,000 5,000 51 MC–12 5,000 5,000 52 MH–60 BLACKHAWK 28,100 28,100 54 UNMANNED ISR 8,207 8,207 56 U–28 31,500 31,500 57 MH–47 CHINOOK 37,500 37,500 59 MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE 1,900 1,900 AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 64 ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M 138,252 138,252 OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 65 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS 16,500 16,500 67 OTHER ITEMS <$5M 28 28 70 TACTICAL VEHICLES 2,990 2,990 71 WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M 37,512 37,512 72 COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS 10,000 10,000 74 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE 7,594 7,594 75 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS 45,194 45,194 TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE 452,047 447,047 TOTAL PROCUREMENT 23,143,022 9,688,058 XLII RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION Line Program Item FY 2020 Senate RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY BASIC RESEARCH 2 0601102A DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 297,976 302,976 Counter UAS University Research [5,000] 3 0601103A UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES 65,858 65,858 4 0601104A UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS 86,164 88,164 3D printing [2,000] 5 0601121A CYBER COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH ALLIANCE 4,982 9,982 Cyber basic research [5,000] SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH 454,980 466,980 APPLIED RESEARCH 10 0602141A LETHALITY TECHNOLOGY 26,961 26,961 11 0602142A ARMY APPLIED RESEARCH 25,319 25,319 12 0602143A SOLDIER LETHALITY TECHNOLOGY 115,274 118,274 UPL MDTF for INDOPACOM [3,000] 13 0602144A GROUND TECHNOLOGY 35,199 41,699 Advanced materials manufacturing process [2,000] Biopolymer structural materials [2,000] Cellulose structural materials [2,500] 14 0602145A NEXT GENERATION COMBAT VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY 219,047 234,047 Support operational energy development and testing [15,000] 15 0602146A NETWORK C3I TECHNOLOGY 114,516 114,516 16 0602147A LONG RANGE PRECISION FIRES TECHNOLOGY 74,327 86,327 Composite tube and propulsion technology [10,000] Novel printed armament components [2,000] 17 0602148A FUTURE VERTICLE LIFT TECHNOLOGY 93,601 93,601 18 0602150A AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY 50,771 50,771 20 0602213A C3I APPLIED CYBER 18,947 23,947 Cyber research [5,000] 38 0602785A MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY 20,873 20,873 40 0602787A MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY 99,155 102,155 Female warfighter performance research [3,000] SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH 893,990 938,490 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 42 0603002A MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 42,030 42,030 47 0603007A MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 11,038 11,038 50 0603117A ARMY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 63,338 63,338 51 0603118A SOLDIER LETHALITY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 118,468 118,468 52 0603119A GROUND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 12,593 32,593 100 hour battery [10,000] Computational manufacturing engineering [2,000] Lightweight protective and hardening materials [3,000] Robotic construction research [5,000] 59 0603457A C3I CYBER ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 13,769 13,769 60 0603461A HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 184,755 184,755 61 0603462A NEXT GENERATION COMBAT VEHICLE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 160,035 185,035 Ground vehicle sustainment research [5,000] Hydrogen fuel cell propulsion & autonomous driving controls [20,000] 62 0603463A NETWORK C3I ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 106,899 106,899 63 0603464A LONG RANGE PRECISION FIRES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 174,386 178,386 Hypersonics research [4,000] 64 0603465A FUTURE VERTICAL LIFT ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 151,640 151,640 65 0603466A AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 60,613 60,613 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 1,099,564 1,148,564 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 73 0603305A ARMY MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 10,987 10,987 74 0603327A AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 15,148 15,148 75 0603619A LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER—ADV DEV 92,915 92,915 77 0603639A TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION 82,146 82,146 78 0603645A ARMORED SYSTEM MODERNIZATION—ADV DEV 157,656 157,656 79 0603747A SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY 6,514 6,514 80 0603766A TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—ADV DEV 34,890 34,890 81 0603774A NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 251,011 251,011 82 0603779A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—DEM/VAL 15,132 15,132 83 0603790A NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 5,406 5,406 84 0603801A AVIATION—ADV DEV 459,290 534,890 UPL FVL CS3 program increase [75,600] 85 0603804A LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV 6,254 6,254 86 0603807A MEDICAL SYSTEMS—ADV DEV 31,175 31,175 87 0603827A SOLDIER SYSTEMS—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 22,113 22,113 88 0604017A ROBOTICS DEVELOPMENT 115,222 115,222 90 0604021A ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY MATURATION (MIP) 18,043 18,043 91 0604100A ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 10,023 10,023 92 0604113A FUTURE TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (FTUAS) 40,745 40,745 93 0604114A LOWER TIER AIR MISSILE DEFENSE (LTAMD) SENSOR 427,772 427,772 94 0604115A TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES 196,676 196,676 95 0604117A MANEUVER—SHORT RANGE AIR DEFENSE (M-SHORAD) 33,100 33,100 97 0604119A ARMY ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPING 115,116 115,116 99 0604121A SYNTHETIC TRAINING ENVIRONMENT REFINEMENT & PROTOTYPING 136,761 136,761 100 0604182A HYPERSONICS 228,000 358,610 UPL accelerate Hypersonic Weapons System [130,610] 102 0604403A FUTURE INTERCEPTOR 8,000 8,000 103 0604541A UNIFIED NETWORK TRANSPORT 39,600 39,600 104 0604644A MOBILE MEDIUM RANGE MISSILE 20,000 20,000 106 0305251A CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS FORCES AND FORCE SUPPORT 52,102 52,102 107 1206120A ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING (PNT) 192,562 192,562 108 1206308A ARMY SPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 104,996 104,996 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 2,929,355 3,135,565 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 109 0604201A AIRCRAFT AVIONICS 29,164 29,164 110 0604270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 70,539 70,539 113 0604601A INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS 106,121 126,021 UPL Next Generation Squad Weapon—Automatic Rifle [19,900] 114 0604604A MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES 2,152 2,152 115 0604611A JAVELIN 17,897 17,897 116 0604622A FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES 16,745 16,745 117 0604633A AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 6,989 6,989 118 0604642A LIGHT TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLES 10,465 10,465 119 0604645A ARMORED SYSTEMS MODERNIZATION (ASM)—ENG DEV 310,152 310,152 120 0604710A NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS—ENG DEV 181,732 181,732 121 0604713A COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT 2,393 2,393 122 0604715A NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—ENG DEV 27,412 27,412 123 0604741A AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—ENG DEV 43,502 43,502 124 0604742A CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 11,636 11,636 125 0604746A AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT 10,915 10,915 126 0604760A DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)—ENG DEV 7,801 7,801 127 0604768A BRILLIANT ANTI-ARMOR SUBMUNITION (BAT) 25,000 25,000 128 0604780A COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE 9,241 9,241 129 0604798A BRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION 42,634 42,634 130 0604802A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS—ENG DEV 181,023 181,023 131 0604804A LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV 103,226 103,226 132 0604805A COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV 12,595 12,595 133 0604807A MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV 48,264 48,264 134 0604808A LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER—ENG DEV 39,208 39,208 135 0604818A ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE 140,637 140,637 136 0604820A RADAR DEVELOPMENT 105,243 105,243 137 0604822A GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM (GFEBS) 46,683 46,683 138 0604823A FIREFINDER 17,294 17,294 139 0604827A SOLDIER SYSTEMS—WARRIOR DEM/VAL 5,803 5,803 140 0604852A SUITE OF SURVIVABILITY ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS—EMD 98,698 98,698 141 0604854A ARTILLERY SYSTEMS—EMD 15,832 15,832 142 0605013A INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 126,537 126,537 143 0605018A INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPPS-A) 142,773 0 Poor business process reengineering [–142,773] 144 0605028A ARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV) 96,730 96,730 145 0605029A INTEGRATED GROUND SECURITY SURVEILLANCE RESPONSE CAPABILITY (IGSSR-C) 6,699 6,699 146 0605030A JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC) 15,882 15,882 147 0605031A JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK (JTN) 40,808 40,808 149 0605033A GROUND-BASED OPERATIONAL SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—EXPEDITIONARY (GBOSS-E) 3,847 3,847 150 0605034A TACTICAL SECURITY SYSTEM (TSS) 6,928 6,928 151 0605035A COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) 34,488 34,488 152 0605036A COMBATING WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION (CWMD) 10,000 10,000 154 0605038A NUCLEAR BIOLOGICAL CHEMICAL RECONNAISSANCE VEHICLE (NBCRV) SENSOR SUITE 6,054 6,054 155 0605041A DEFENSIVE CYBER TOOL DEVELOPMENT 62,262 62,262 156 0605042A TACTICAL NETWORK RADIO SYSTEMS (LOW-TIER) 35,654 35,654 157 0605047A CONTRACT WRITING SYSTEM 19,682 0 Program duplication [–19,682] 158 0605049A MISSILE WARNING SYSTEM MODERNIZATION (MWSM) 1,539 1,539 159 0605051A AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY DEVELOPMENT 64,557 64,557 160 0605052A INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INC 2—BLOCK 1 243,228 149,628 EMAM development ahead of need [–124,200] Iron Dome testing and delivery [20,600] UPL Multi-Domain Artillery [10,000] 161 0605053A GROUND ROBOTICS 41,308 28,508 Army requested realignment [–12,800] 162 0605054A EMERGING TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVES 45,896 45,896 163 0605203A ARMY SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 164,883 164,883 165 0605450A JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) 9,500 9,500 166 0605457A ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) 208,938 208,938 167 0605625A MANNED GROUND VEHICLE 378,400 418,400 UPL NGCV 50mm gun [40,000] 168 0605766A NATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION (MIP) 7,835 7,835 169 0605812A JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH 2,732 7,232 Army requested realignment [4,500] 170 0605830A AVIATION GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 1,664 1,664 172 0303032A TROJAN—RH12 3,936 3,936 174 0304270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 19,675 19,675 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 3,549,431 3,344,976 RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 176 0604256A THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT 14,117 16,117 Cybersecurity threat simulation [2,000] 177 0604258A TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 8,327 8,327 178 0604759A MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT 136,565 136,565 179 0605103A RAND ARROYO CENTER 13,113 13,113 180 0605301A ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL 238,691 238,691 181 0605326A CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM 42,922 42,922 183 0605601A ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES 334,468 349,468 Directed energy test capabilities [15,000] 184 0605602A ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS 46,974 46,974 185 0605604A SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS 35,075 35,075 186 0605606A AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION 3,461 3,461 187 0605702A METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES 6,233 6,233 188 0605706A MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS 21,342 21,342 189 0605709A EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS 11,168 11,168 190 0605712A SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING 52,723 52,723 191 0605716A ARMY EVALUATION CENTER 60,815 60,815 192 0605718A ARMY MODELING & SIM X-CMD COLLABORATION & INTEG 2,527 2,527 193 0605801A PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES 58,175 58,175 194 0605803A TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES 25,060 25,060 195 0605805A MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY 44,458 44,458 196 0605857A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT 4,681 4,681 197 0605898A ARMY DIRECT REPORT HEADQUARTERS—R&D - MHA 53,820 53,820 198 0606001A MILITARY GROUND-BASED CREW TECHNOLOGY 4,291 4,291 199 0606002A RONALD REAGAN BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST SITE 62,069 62,069 200 0606003A COUNTERINTEL AND HUMAN INTEL MODERNIZATION 1,050 1,050 201 0606942A ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS CYBER VULNERABILITIES 4,500 4,500 SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1,286,625 1,303,625 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 204 0603778A MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 22,877 22,877 206 0605024A ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 8,491 8,491 207 0607131A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 15,645 15,645 209 0607134A LONG RANGE PRECISION FIRES (LRPF) 164,182 164,182 211 0607136A BLACKHAWK PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 13,039 13,039 212 0607137A CHINOOK PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 174,371 174,371 213 0607138A FIXED WING PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 4,545 4,545 214 0607139A IMPROVED TURBINE ENGINE PROGRAM 206,434 206,434 216 0607142A AVIATION ROCKET SYSTEM PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT 24,221 24,221 217 0607143A UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM UNIVERSAL PRODUCTS 32,016 32,016 218 0607145A APACHE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT 5,448 5,448 219 0607312A ARMY OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 49,526 49,526 220 0607665A FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS 1,702 1,702 221 0607865A PATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT 96,430 96,430 222 0203728A JOINT AUTOMATED DEEP OPERATION COORDINATION SYSTEM (JADOCS) 47,398 47,398 223 0203735A COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 334,463 334,463 225 0203743A 155MM SELF-PROPELLED HOWITZER IMPROVEMENTS 214,246 214,246 226 0203744A AIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 16,486 16,486 227 0203752A AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 144 144 228 0203758A DIGITIZATION 5,270 5,270 229 0203801A MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1,287 1,287 230 0203802A OTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 0 24,100 UPL CD ATACMS [24,100] 234 0205412A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEV 732 732 235 0205456A LOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AMD) SYSTEM 107,746 107,746 236 0205778A GUIDED MULTIPLE-LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (GMLRS) 138,594 138,594 238 0303028A SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES 13,845 13,845 239 0303140A INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 29,185 29,185 240 0303141A GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM 68,976 68,976 241 0303150A WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM 2,073 2,073 245 0305179A INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS) 459 459 246 0305204A TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES 5,097 5,097 247 0305206A AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS 11,177 11,177 248 0305208A DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 38,121 38,121 250 0305232A RQ–11 UAV 3,218 3,218 251 0305233A RQ–7 UAV 7,817 7,817 252 0307665A BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE 2,000 2,000 253 0708045A END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES 59,848 62,848 Nanoscale materials manufacturing [3,000] 254 1203142A SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE) 34,169 34,169 255 1208053A JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM 10,275 10,275 999 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 7,273 7,273 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 1,978,826 2,005,926 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY 12,192,771 12,344,126 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY BASIC RESEARCH 1 0601103N UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES 116,850 126,850 Cyber basic research [10,000] 2 0601152N IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH 19,121 19,121 3 0601153N DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 470,007 470,007 SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH 605,978 615,978 APPLIED RESEARCH 4 0602114N POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH 18,546 18,546 5 0602123N FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH 119,517 136,017 Carbon capture [8,000] Electric propulsion research [2,500] Energy resilience research [3,000] Program reduction [–5,000] Test bed for autonomous ship systems [8,000] 6 0602131M MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY 56,604 59,604 Interdisciplinary cybersecurity [3,000] 7 0602235N COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH 49,297 44,297 Coordinate space activities [–5,000] 8 0602236N WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH 63,825 65,825 Warfighter safety and performance research [2,000] 9 0602271N ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH 83,497 78,497 Coordinate EW activities [–5,000] 10 0602435N OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH 63,894 63,894 11 0602651M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH 6,346 6,346 12 0602747N UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH 57,075 64,575 Undersea vehicle technology research [7,500] 13 0602750N FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH 154,755 154,755 14 0602782N MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH 36,074 36,074 15 0602792N INNOVATIVE NAVAL PROTOTYPES (INP) APPLIED RESEARCH 153,062 153,062 16 0602861N SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT—ONR FIELD ACITIVITIES 73,961 73,961 SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH 936,453 955,453 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 17 0603123N FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 35,286 35,286 18 0603271N ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 9,499 9,499 19 0603640M USMC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION (ATD) 172,847 176,847 Consolidate efforts in AI/ML with Joint Force [–5,000] UPL MUDLAN program increase [9,000] 20 0603651M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 13,307 13,307 21 0603673N FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 231,907 231,907 22 0603680N MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 60,138 60,138 23 0603729N WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 4,849 4,849 25 0603758N NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS 67,739 67,739 26 0603782N MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 13,335 13,335 27 0603801N INNOVATIVE NAVAL PROTOTYPES (INP) ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 133,303 128,303 Reduce electronic manuever [–5,000] SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 742,210 741,210 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 28 0603207N AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS 32,643 38,643 Program increase for 1 REMUS 600 vehicle [6,000] 29 0603216N AVIATION SURVIVABILITY 11,919 11,919 30 0603251N AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS 1,473 1,473 31 0603254N ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 7,172 7,172 32 0603261N TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE 3,419 3,419 33 0603382N ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY 64,694 64,694 34 0603502N SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES 507,000 134,500 Excess procurement ahead of satisfactory testing [–372,500] 35 0603506N SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE 15,800 15,800 36 0603512N CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 4,997 4,997 37 0603525N PILOT FISH 291,148 291,148 38 0603527N RETRACT LARCH 11,980 11,980 39 0603536N RETRACT JUNIPER 129,163 129,163 40 0603542N RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL 689 689 41 0603553N SURFACE ASW 1,137 1,137 42 0603561N ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 148,756 153,756 Project 2033: Test site emergent repairs [5,000] 43 0603562N SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS 11,192 11,192 44 0603563N SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN 81,846 57,846 Early to need [–24,000] 45 0603564N SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES 69,084 22,484 Early to need [–46,600] 46 0603570N ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS 181,652 181,652 47 0603573N ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS 25,408 150,408 Surface combatant component-level prototyping [125,000] 48 0603576N CHALK EAGLE 64,877 64,877 49 0603581N LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS) 9,934 9,934 50 0603582N COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION 17,251 17,251 51 0603595N OHIO REPLACEMENT 419,051 434,051 Accelerate advanced propulsor development [15,000] 52 0603596N LCS MISSION MODULES 108,505 103,505 Availabe prior year funds due to SUW MP testing delay [–5,000] 53 0603597N AUTOMATED TEST AND ANALYSIS 7,653 7,653 54 0603599N FRIGATE DEVELOPMENT 59,007 59,007 55 0603609N CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS 9,988 9,988 56 0603635M MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM 86,464 86,464 57 0603654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT 33,478 33,478 58 0603713N OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 5,619 5,619 59 0603721N ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 20,564 20,564 60 0603724N NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM 26,514 26,514 61 0603725N FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT 3,440 3,440 62 0603734N CHALK CORAL 346,800 346,800 63 0603739N NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY 3,857 3,857 64 0603746N RETRACT MAPLE 258,519 258,519 65 0603748N LINK PLUMERIA 403,909 403,909 66 0603751N RETRACT ELM 63,434 63,434 67 0603764N LINK EVERGREEN 184,110 184,110 68 0603790N NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 7,697 7,697 69 0603795N LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY 9,086 9,086 70 0603851M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TESTING 28,466 28,466 71 0603860N JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS—DEM/VAL 51,341 51,341 72 0603925N DIRECTED ENERGY AND ELECTRIC WEAPON SYSTEMS 118,169 118,169 73 0604014N F/A –18 INFRARED SEARCH AND TRACK (IRST) 113,456 113,456 74 0604027N DIGITAL WARFARE OFFICE 50,120 50,120 75 0604028N SMALL AND MEDIUM UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLES 32,527 32,527 76 0604029N UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLE CORE TECHNOLOGIES 54,376 54,376 77 0604030N RAPID PROTOTYPING, EXPERIMENTATION AND DEMONSTRATION. 36,197 36,197 78 0604031N LARGE UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLES 68,310 68,310 79 0604112N GERALD R. FORD CLASS NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIER (CVN 78—80) 121,310 121,310 80 0604126N LITTORAL AIRBORNE MCM 17,248 17,248 81 0604127N SURFACE MINE COUNTERMEASURES 18,735 18,735 82 0604272N TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (TADIRCM) 68,346 68,346 84 0604289M NEXT GENERATION LOGISTICS 4,420 13,420 Additive manufacturing logistics software pilot [9,000] 85 0604320M RAPID TECHNOLOGY CAPABILITY PROTOTYPE 4,558 4,558 86 0604454N LX (R) 12,500 12,500 87 0604536N ADVANCED UNDERSEA PROTOTYPING 181,967 181,967 88 0604636N COUNTER UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (C-UAS) 5,500 5,500 89 0604659N PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 718,148 723,148 Increase for SLCM-N AOA [5,000] 90 0604707N SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING SUPPORT 5,263 5,263 91 0604786N OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT 65,419 65,419 92 0303354N ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT—MIP 9,991 9,991 93 0304240M ADVANCED TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM 21,157 21,157 95 0304270N ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT—MIP 609 609 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 5,559,062 5,275,962 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 96 0603208N TRAINING SYSTEM AIRCRAFT 15,514 15,514 97 0604212N OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT 28,835 28,835 98 0604214M AV–8B AIRCRAFT—ENG DEV 27,441 27,441 100 0604215N STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT 3,642 3,642 101 0604216N MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT 19,196 19,196 104 0604230N WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM 8,601 8,601 105 0604231N TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM 77,232 77,232 106 0604234N ADVANCED HAWKEYE 232,752 232,752 107 0604245M H–1 UPGRADES 65,359 65,359 109 0604261N ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS 47,013 47,013 110 0604262N V–22A 185,105 190,605 Increase reliability and reduce vibrations of V–22 Nacelles [5,500] 111 0604264N AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 21,172 21,172 112 0604269N EA–18 143,585 143,585 113 0604270N ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 116,811 116,811 114 0604273M EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT 187,436 187,436 116 0604274N NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) 524,261 524,261 117 0604280N JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM—NAVY (JTRS-NAVY) 192,345 192,345 118 0604282N NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) INCREMENT II 111,068 111,068 119 0604307N SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING 415,625 415,625 120 0604311N LPD–17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 640 640 121 0604329N SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) 50,096 50,096 122 0604366N STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS 232,391 232,391 123 0604373N AIRBORNE MCM 10,916 10,916 124 0604378N NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL—COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 33,379 33,379 125 0604501N ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS 34,554 34,554 126 0604503N SSN–688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION 84,663 84,663 127 0604504N AIR CONTROL 44,923 44,923 128 0604512N SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS 10,632 10,632 129 0604518N COMBAT INFORMATION CENTER CONVERSION 16,094 16,094 130 0604522N AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR (AMDR) SYSTEM 55,349 55,349 131 0604530N ADVANCED ARRESTING GEAR (AAG) 123,490 123,490 132 0604558N NEW DESIGN SSN 121,010 121,010 133 0604562N SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM 62,426 62,426 134 0604567N SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/ LIVE FIRE T&E 46,809 46,809 135 0604574N NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES 3,692 3,692 137 0604601N MINE DEVELOPMENT 28,964 100,264 UPL Quickstrike JDAM ER [71,300] 138 0604610N LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT 148,349 148,349 139 0604654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT 8,237 8,237 140 0604657M USMC GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV 22,000 22,000 141 0604703N PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS 5,500 5,500 142 0604727N JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS 18,725 18,725 143 0604755N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) 192,603 192,603 144 0604756N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL) 137,268 137,268 145 0604757N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW) 97,363 97,363 146 0604761N INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING 26,710 26,710 147 0604771N MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT 8,181 8,181 148 0604777N NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM 40,755 40,755 149 0604800M JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD 1,710 1,710 150 0604800N JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD 1,490 1,490 153 0605013M INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 1,494 1,494 154 0605013N INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 384,162 328,722 eProcurement program duplication [–55,440] 155 0605024N ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 4,882 4,882 156 0605212M CH–53K RDTE 516,955 506,955 Early to need [–10,000] 158 0605215N MISSION PLANNING 75,886 75,886 159 0605217N COMMON AVIONICS 43,187 43,187 160 0605220N SHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR (SSC) 4,909 19,909 Expand development and use of composite materials [15,000] 161 0605327N T-AO 205 CLASS 1,682 1,682 162 0605414N UNMANNED CARRIER AVIATION (UCA) 671,258 671,258 163 0605450M JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) 18,393 18,393 165 0605500N MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA) 21,472 21,472 166 0605504N MULTI-MISSION MARITIME (MMA) INCREMENT III 177,234 177,234 167 0605611M MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 77,322 77,322 168 0605813M JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 2,105 2,105 169 0204202N DDG–1000 111,435 111,435 172 0304785N TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS 101,339 101,339 173 0306250M CYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 26,406 26,406 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 6,332,033 6,358,393 MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 174 0604256N THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT 66,678 66,678 175 0604258N TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 12,027 12,027 176 0604759N MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT 85,348 85,348 178 0605152N STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—NAVY 3,908 3,908 179 0605154N CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES 47,669 47,669 180 0605285N NEXT GENERATION FIGHTER 20,698 20,698 182 0605804N TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES 988 988 183 0605853N MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT 102,401 102,401 184 0605856N STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT 3,742 3,742 186 0605863N RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT 93,872 93,872 187 0605864N TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT 394,020 394,020 188 0605865N OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY 25,145 25,145 189 0605866N NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) SUPPORT 15,773 15,773 190 0605867N SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT 8,402 8,402 191 0605873M MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT 37,265 37,265 192 0605898N MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D 39,673 39,673 193 0606355N WARFARE INNOVATION MANAGEMENT 28,750 28,750 196 0305327N INSIDER THREAT 2,645 2,645 197 0902498N MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (DEPARTMENTAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES) 1,460 1,460 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 990,464 990,464 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 202 0604227N HARPOON MODIFICATIONS 2,302 2,302 203 0604840M F–35 C2D2 422,881 422,881 204 0604840N F–35 C2D2 383,741 383,741 205 0607658N COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY (CEC) 127,924 127,924 207 0101221N STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT 157,676 157,676 208 0101224N SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 43,354 43,354 209 0101226N SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 6,815 6,815 210 0101402N NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS 31,174 31,174 211 0204136N F/A–18 SQUADRONS 213,715 213,715 213 0204228N SURFACE SUPPORT 36,389 36,389 214 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER (TMPC) 320,134 320,134 215 0204311N INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM 88,382 103,382 Additional TRAPS units [15,000] 216 0204313N SHIP-TOWED ARRAY SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS 14,449 14,449 217 0204413N AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS (DISPLACEMENT CRAFT) 6,931 6,931 218 0204460M GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR) 23,891 23,891 219 0204571N CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 129,873 129,873 221 0204575N ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT 82,325 82,325 222 0205601N HARM IMPROVEMENT 138,431 138,431 224 0205620N SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION 29,572 29,572 225 0205632N MK–48 ADCAP 85,973 85,973 226 0205633N AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS 125,461 125,461 227 0205675N OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS 106,192 106,192 228 0206313M MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 143,317 143,317 229 0206335M COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (CAC2S) 4,489 4,489 230 0206623M MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS 51,788 51,788 231 0206624M MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT 37,761 42,761 Airborne Power Generation Tech Development [5,000] 232 0206625M USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP) 21,458 21,458 233 0206629M AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT VEHICLE 5,476 5,476 234 0207161N TACTICAL AIM MISSILES 19,488 19,488 235 0207163N ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) 39,029 39,029 239 0303109N SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) 34,344 34,344 240 0303138N CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES (CANES) 22,873 22,873 241 0303140N INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 41,853 41,853 243 0305192N MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (MIP) ACTIVITIES 8,913 8,913 244 0305204N TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES 9,451 9,451 245 0305205N UAS INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY 42,315 42,315 246 0305208M DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 22,042 22,042 248 0305220N MQ–4C TRITON 11,784 11,784 249 0305231N MQ–8 UAV 29,618 29,618 250 0305232M RQ–11 UAV 509 509 251 0305234N SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0) 11,545 11,545 252 0305239M RQ–21A 10,914 10,914 253 0305241N MULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT 70,612 70,612 254 0305242M UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS) PAYLOADS (MIP) 3,704 3,704 255 0305421N RQ–4 MODERNIZATION 202,346 202,346 256 0308601N MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT 7,119 7,119 257 0702207N DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) 38,182 38,182 258 0708730N MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH) 6,779 6,779 259 1203109N SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) 15,868 15,868 999 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 1,613,137 1,613,137 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 5,104,299 5,124,299 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY 20,270,499 20,061,759 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF BASIC RESEARCH 1 0601102F DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 356,107 356,107 2 0601103F UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES 158,859 158,859 3 0601108F HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES 14,795 14,795 SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH 529,761 529,761 APPLIED RESEARCH 4 0602102F MATERIALS 128,851 122,851 Advanced materials high energy x-ray [4,000] Duplicative material research [–10,000] 5 0602201F AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES 147,724 137,724 Reduce program growth [–10,000] 6 0602202F HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH 131,795 131,795 7 0602203F AEROSPACE PROPULSION 198,775 198,775 8 0602204F AEROSPACE SENSORS 202,912 202,912 10 0602298F SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT— MAJOR HEADQUARTERS ACTIVITIES 7,968 7,968 12 0602602F CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS 142,772 142,772 13 0602605F DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY 124,379 124,379 14 0602788F DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS 181,562 199,062 Counter UAS cyber [2,500] Cyberspace dominance technology research [10,000] Quantum science [5,000] 15 0602890F HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH 44,221 49,221 High power microwave research [5,000] 16 1206601F SPACE TECHNOLOGY 124,667 124,667 SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH 1,435,626 1,442,126 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 17 0603112F ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS 36,586 38,586 Metals affordability research [2,000] 18 0603199F SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T) 16,249 16,249 19 0603203F ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS 38,292 38,292 20 0603211F AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO 102,949 307,949 Accelerate air breathing hypersonic program [75,000] Active winglets development [5,000] Advanced Personnel Recovery [25,000] LCAAT [100,000] 21 0603216F AEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY 113,973 123,973 Advanced turbine engine gas generator [10,000] 22 0603270F ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY 48,408 38,408 Duplicative EW & PNT research [–10,000] 23 0603401F ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY 70,525 73,525 Strategic radiation hardened microelectronic processors [3,000] 24 0603444F MAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS) 11,878 11,878 25 0603456F HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 37,542 37,542 26 0603601F CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 225,817 225,817 27 0603605F ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 37,404 37,404 28 0603680F MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 43,116 50,116 Advanced materials and materials manufacturing [7,000] 29 0603788F BATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 56,414 66,414 Cyber applied research [10,000] SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 839,153 1,066,153 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 31 0603260F INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 5,672 5,672 32 0603742F COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY 27,085 27,085 33 0603790F NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 4,955 4,955 34 0603851F INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—DEM/VAL 44,109 44,109 36 0604002F AIR FORCE WEATHER SERVICES RESEARCH 772 772 37 0604004F ADVANCED ENGINE DEVELOPMENT 878,442 878,442 38 0604015F LONG RANGE STRIKE—BOMBER 3,003,899 3,003,899 39 0604032F DIRECTED ENERGY PROTOTYPING 10,000 10,000 40 0604033F HYPERSONICS PROTOTYPING 576,000 576,000 41 0604201F PNT RESILIENCY, MODS, AND IMPROVEMENTS 92,600 124,600 UPL M-CODE acceleration [32,000] 42 0604257F ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AND SENSORS 23,145 23,145 43 0604288F NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPS CENTER (NAOC) RECAP 16,669 16,669 44 0604317F TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 23,614 23,614 45 0604327F HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT SYSTEM (HDBTDS) PROGRAM 113,121 113,121 46 0604414F CYBER RESILIENCY OF WEAPON SYSTEMS-ACS 56,325 56,325 47 0604776F DEPLOYMENT & DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE R&D 28,034 28,034 48 0604858F TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM 128,476 134,476 Rapid repair [6,000] 49 0605230F GROUND BASED STRATEGIC DETERRENT 570,373 592,373 Program consolidation [22,000] 50 0207100F LIGHT ATTACK ARMED RECONNAISSANCE (LAAR) SQUADRONS 35,000 85,000 Light attack experiment [50,000] 51 0207110F NEXT GENERATION AIR DOMINANCE 1,000,000 1,000,000 52 0207455F THREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR (3DELRR) 37,290 37,290 53 0208099F UNIFIED PLATFORM (UP) 10,000 10,000 54 0305236F COMMON DATA LINK EXECUTIVE AGENT (CDL EA) 36,910 36,910 55 0305251F CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS FORCES AND FORCE SUPPORT 35,000 35,000 56 0305601F MISSION PARTNER ENVIRONMENTS 8,550 8,550 57 0306250F CYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 198,864 240,064 Accelerate development of Cyber National Mission Force capabilities [13,600] ETERNALDARKNESS [7,100] Joint Common Access Platform [20,500] 58 0306415F ENABLED CYBER ACTIVITIES 16,632 16,632 60 0901410F CONTRACTING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM 20,830 20,830 61 1203164F NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER EQUIPMENT) (SPACE) 329,948 329,948 62 1203710F EO/IR WEATHER SYSTEMS 101,222 101,222 63 1206422F WEATHER SYSTEM FOLLOW-ON 225,660 225,660 64 1206425F SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS 29,776 29,776 65 1206427F SPACE SYSTEMS PROTOTYPE TRANSITIONS (SSPT) 142,045 142,045 67 1206438F SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY 64,231 64,231 68 1206730F SPACE SECURITY AND DEFENSE PROGRAM 56,385 56,385 69 1206760F PROTECTED TACTICAL ENTERPRISE SERVICE (PTES) 105,003 95,003 Unjustified growth [–10,000] 70 1206761F PROTECTED TACTICAL SERVICE (PTS) 173,694 163,694 Unjustified growth [–10,000] 71 1206855F EVOLVED STRATEGIC SATCOM (ESS) 172,206 172,206 72 1206857F SPACE RAPID CAPABILITIES OFFICE 33,742 33,742 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 8,436,279 8,567,479 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 73 0604200F FUTURE ADVANCED WEAPON ANALYSIS & PROGRAMS 246,200 97,120 ERWn contract delay [–149,080] 74 0604201F PNT RESILIENCY, MODS, AND IMPROVEMENTS 67,782 148,782 UPL M-Code Acceleration [81,000] 75 0604222F NUCLEAR WEAPONS SUPPORT 4,406 4,406 76 0604270F ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 2,066 2,066 77 0604281F TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE 229,631 229,631 78 0604287F PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT 9,700 9,700 79 0604329F SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)—EMD 31,241 31,241 80 0604429F AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK 2 2 81 0604602F ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT 28,043 28,043 82 0604604F SUBMUNITIONS 3,045 3,045 83 0604617F AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT 19,944 19,944 84 0604706F LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS 8,624 8,624 85 0604735F COMBAT TRAINING RANGES 37,365 37,365 86 0604800F F–35—EMD 7,628 7,628 87 0604932F LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON 712,539 712,539 88 0604933F ICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION 161,199 161,199 89 0605030F JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC) 2,414 2,414 91 0605056F OPEN ARCHITECTURE MANAGEMENT 30,000 30,000 93 0605221F KC–46 59,561 59,561 94 0605223F ADVANCED PILOT TRAINING 348,473 348,473 95 0605229F COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER 247,047 247,047 98 0605931F B–2 DEFENSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 294,400 294,400 99 0101125F NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION 27,564 27,564 100 0101213F MINUTEMAN SQUADRONS 1 1 101 0207171F F–15 EPAWSS 47,322 47,322 102 0207328F STAND IN ATTACK WEAPON 162,840 162,840 103 0207701F FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING 9,797 9,797 106 0401310F C–32 EXECUTIVE TRANSPORT RECAPITALIZATION 9,930 9,930 107 0401319F VC–25B 757,923 757,923 108 0701212F AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEMS 2,787 2,787 109 1203176F COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATOR 2,000 2,000 110 1203269F GPS III FOLLOW-ON (GPS IIIF) 462,875 462,875 111 1203940F SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS 76,829 76,829 112 1206421F COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS 29,037 29,037 113 1206422F WEATHER SYSTEM FOLLOW-ON 2,237 2,237 114 1206425F SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS 412,894 412,894 115 1206426F SPACE FENCE 0 20,000 Space Fence [20,000] 116 1206431F ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE) 117,290 117,290 117 1206432F POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE) 427,400 427,400 118 1206433F WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE) 1,920 1,920 119 1206441F SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIGH EMD 1 1 120 1206442F NEXT GENERATION OPIR 1,395,278 1,395,278 122 1206853F NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE)—EMD 432,009 432,009 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 6,929,244 6,881,164 MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 123 0604256F THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT 59,693 59,693 124 0604759F MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT 181,663 232,663 UPL M-Code Acceleration [36,000] Utah training range instrumentation [15,000] 125 0605101F RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE 35,258 35,258 127 0605712F INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION 13,793 13,793 128 0605807F TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT 717,895 771,895 Acelerate prototype program [5,000] Facilitates 5G test and evaluation [49,000] 129 0605826F ACQ WORKFORCE- GLOBAL POWER 258,667 258,667 130 0605827F ACQ WORKFORCE- GLOBAL VIG & COMBAT SYS 251,992 251,992 131 0605828F ACQ WORKFORCE- GLOBAL REACH 149,191 149,191 132 0605829F ACQ WORKFORCE- CYBER, NETWORK, & BUS SYS 235,360 235,360 133 0605830F ACQ WORKFORCE- GLOBAL BATTLE MGMT 160,196 160,196 134 0605831F ACQ WORKFORCE- CAPABILITY INTEGRATION 220,255 220,255 135 0605832F ACQ WORKFORCE- ADVANCED PRGM TECHNOLOGY 42,392 42,392 136 0605833F ACQ WORKFORCE- NUCLEAR SYSTEMS 133,231 133,231 137 0605898F MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D 5,590 5,590 138 0605976F FACILITIES RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT 88,445 88,445 139 0605978F FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT 29,424 29,424 140 0606017F REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION 62,715 62,715 141 0606398F MANAGEMENT HQ—T&E 5,013 5,013 142 0308602F ENTEPRISE INFORMATION SERVICES (EIS) 17,128 17,128 143 0702806F ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 5,913 5,913 144 0804731F GENERAL SKILL TRAINING 1,475 1,475 146 1001004F INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES 4,071 4,071 147 1206116F SPACE TEST AND TRAINING RANGE DEVELOPMENT 19,942 19,942 148 1206392F SPACE AND MISSILE CENTER (SMC) CIVILIAN WORKFORCE 167,810 167,810 149 1206398F SPACE & MISSILE SYSTEMS CENTER—MHA 10,170 10,170 150 1206860F ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE) 13,192 13,192 151 1206864F SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP) 26,097 26,097 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 2,916,571 3,021,571 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 152 0604003F ADVANCED BATTLE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ABMS) 35,611 84,611 Accelerates 5G military use [49,000] 154 0604233F SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING 2,584 2,584 156 0604776F DEPLOYMENT & DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE R&D 903 903 157 0604840F F–35 C2D2 694,455 694,455 158 0605018F AF INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM (AF-IPPS) 40,567 0 Poor agile development [–40,567] 159 0605024F ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY 47,193 47,193 160 0605117F FOREIGN MATERIEL ACQUISITION AND EXPLOITATION 70,083 70,083 161 0605278F HC/MC–130 RECAP RDT&E 17,218 4,818 program delay [–12,400] 162 0606018F NC3 INTEGRATION 25,917 25,917 164 0101113F B–52 SQUADRONS 325,974 325,974 165 0101122F AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) 10,217 10,217 166 0101126F B–1B SQUADRONS 1,000 1,000 167 0101127F B–2 SQUADRONS 97,276 97,276 168 0101213F MINUTEMAN SQUADRONS 128,961 106,961 Program consolidation [–22,000] 170 0101316F WORLDWIDE JOINT STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS 18,177 18,177 171 0101324F INTEGRATED STRATEGIC PLANNING & ANALYSIS NETWORK 24,261 24,261 172 0101328F ICBM REENTRY VEHICLES 75,571 75,571 174 0102110F UH–1N REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 170,975 170,975 176 0205219F MQ–9 UAV 154,996 154,996 178 0207131F A–10 SQUADRONS 36,816 36,816 179 0207133F F–16 SQUADRONS 193,013 193,013 180 0207134F F–15E SQUADRONS 336,079 336,079 181 0207136F MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION 15,521 15,521 182 0207138F F–22A SQUADRONS 496,298 496,298 183 0207142F F–35 SQUADRONS 99,943 99,943 184 0207161F TACTICAL AIM MISSILES 10,314 10,314 185 0207163F ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) 55,384 55,384 186 0207227F COMBAT RESCUE—PARARESCUE 281 281 187 0207247F AF TENCAP 21,365 21,365 188 0207249F PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT 10,696 10,696 189 0207253F COMPASS CALL 15,888 15,888 190 0207268F AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 112,505 112,505 191 0207325F JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE (JASSM) 78,498 78,498 192 0207410F AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) 114,864 114,864 193 0207412F CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC) 8,109 8,109 194 0207417F AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (AWACS) 67,996 67,996 195 0207418F TACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS 2,462 2,462 197 0207431F COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES 13,668 13,668 198 0207444F TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY-MOD 6,217 6,217 200 0207452F DCAPES 19,910 19,910 201 0207573F NATIONAL TECHNICAL NUCLEAR FORENSICS 1,788 1,788 202 0207590F SEEK EAGLE 28,237 28,237 203 0207601F USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION 15,725 15,725 204 0207605F WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS 4,316 4,316 205 0207610F BATTLEFIELD ABN COMM NODE (BACN) 26,946 26,946 206 0207697F DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES 4,303 4,303 207 0208006F MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS 71,465 71,465 208 0208007F TACTICAL DECEPTION 7,446 7,446 209 0208064F OPERATIONAL HQ—CYBER 7,602 7,602 210 0208087F DISTRIBUTED CYBER WARFARE OPERATIONS 35,178 35,178 211 0208088F AF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 16,609 16,609 212 0208097F JOINT CYBER COMMAND AND CONTROL (JCC2) 11,603 11,603 213 0208099F UNIFIED PLATFORM (UP) 84,702 84,702 218 0301004F ADVANCED DATA TRANSPORT FLIGHT TEST 0 21,000 Accelerate prototype test of 5G [21,000] 219 0301025F GEOBASE 2,723 2,723 220 0301112F NUCLEAR PLANNING AND EXECUTION SYSTEM (NPES) 44,190 44,190 226 0301401F AIR FORCE SPACE AND CYBER NON-TRADITIONAL ISR FOR BATTLESPACE AWARENESS 3,575 3,575 227 0302015F E–4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER (NAOC) 70,173 70,173 228 0303131F MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN) 13,543 13,543 229 0303133F HIGH FREQUENCY RADIO SYSTEMS 15,881 15,881 230 0303140F INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 27,726 27,726 232 0303142F GLOBAL FORCE MANAGEMENT—DATA INITIATIVE 2,210 2,210 234 0304115F MULTI DOMAIN COMMAND AND CONTROL (MDC2) 150,880 150,880 235 0304260F AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE 102,667 102,667 236 0304310F COMMERCIAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 3,431 3,431 239 0305015F C2 AIR OPERATIONS SUITE—C2 INFO SERVICES 9,313 9,313 240 0305020F CCMD INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1,121 1,121 241 0305022F ISR MODERNIZATION & AUTOMATION DVMT (IMAD) 19,000 0 Not mature plan [–19,000] 242 0305099F GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM) 4,544 4,544 243 0305111F WEATHER SERVICE 25,461 25,461 244 0305114F AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, AND LANDING SYSTEM (ATCALS) 5,651 5,651 245 0305116F AERIAL TARGETS 7,448 7,448 248 0305128F SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES 425 425 249 0305145F ARMS CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION 54,546 54,546 250 0305146F DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES 6,858 6,858 252 0305179F INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS) 8,728 8,728 253 0305202F DRAGON U–2 38,939 38,939 255 0305206F AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS 122,909 122,909 256 0305207F MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS 11,787 11,787 257 0305208F DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 25,009 25,009 258 0305220F RQ–4 UAV 191,733 191,733 259 0305221F NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGETING 10,757 10,757 260 0305238F NATO AGS 32,567 32,567 261 0305240F SUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE 37,774 37,774 262 0305600F INTERNATIONAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURES 13,515 13,515 263 0305881F RAPID CYBER ACQUISITION 4,383 4,383 264 0305984F PERSONNEL RECOVERY COMMAND & CTRL (PRC2) 2,133 2,133 265 0307577F INTELLIGENCE MISSION DATA (IMD) 8,614 8,614 266 0401115F C–130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON 140,425 140,425 267 0401119F C–5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS (IF) 10,223 10,223 268 0401130F C–17 AIRCRAFT (IF) 25,101 25,101 269 0401132F C–130J PROGRAM 8,640 8,640 270 0401134F LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES (LAIRCM) 5,424 5,424 272 0401219F KC–10S 20 20 274 0401318F CV–22 17,906 17,906 276 0408011F SPECIAL TACTICS / COMBAT CONTROL 3,629 3,629 277 0702207F DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) 1,890 1,890 278 0708055F MAINTENANCE, REPAIR & OVERHAUL SYSTEM 10,311 10,311 279 0708610F LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT) 16,065 16,065 280 0708611F SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 539 539 281 0804743F OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING 2,057 2,057 282 0808716F OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES 10 10 283 0901202F JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY 2,060 2,060 284 0901218F CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM 3,809 3,809 285 0901220F PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 6,476 6,476 286 0901226F AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY 1,443 1,443 287 0901538F FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 9,323 9,323 288 0901554F DEFENSE ENTERPRISE ACNTNG AND MGT SYS (DEAMS) 46,789 46,789 289 1201017F GLOBAL SENSOR INTEGRATED ON NETWORK (GSIN) 3,647 3,647 290 1201921F SERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM—SPACE ACTIVITIES 988 988 291 1202140F SERVICE SUPPORT TO SPACECOM ACTIVITIES 11,863 11,863 293 1203001F FAMILY OF ADVANCED BLOS TERMINALS (FAB-T) 197,388 197,388 294 1203110F SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE) 61,891 61,891 297 1203173F SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER 4,566 4,566 298 1203174F SPACE INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND RAPID TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 43,292 43,292 300 1203182F SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE) 10,837 10,837 301 1203265F GPS III SPACE SEGMENT 42,440 42,440 302 1203400F SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE 14,428 14,428 303 1203614F JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM 72,762 72,762 304 1203620F NATIONAL SPACE DEFENSE CENTER 2,653 2,653 306 1203873F BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE RADARS 15,881 15,881 308 1203913F NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE) 49,300 49,300 309 1203940F SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS 17,834 17,834 310 1206423F GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III—OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT 445,302 445,302 311 1206770F ENTERPRISE GROUND SERVICES 138,870 138,870 999 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 18,029,506 18,351,506 Transfer back to base funding [322,000] SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 24,529,488 24,827,521 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF 45,616,122 46,335,775 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW BASIC RESEARCH 1 0601000BR DTRA BASIC RESEARCH 26,000 26,000 2 0601101E DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES 432,284 432,284 3 0601110D8Z BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES 48,874 58,874 DEPSCOR [10,000] 4 0601117E BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE 54,122 54,122 5 0601120D8Z NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM 92,074 102,074 Submarine industrial base workforce training and education [10,000] 6 0601228D8Z HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES/MINORITY INSTITUTIONS 30,708 32,708 Aerospace research and education [2,000] 7 0601384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 45,238 45,238 SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH 729,300 751,300 APPLIED RESEARCH 8 0602000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY 19,306 19,306 9 0602115E BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY 97,771 97,771 11 0602234D8Z LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM 52,317 52,317 12 0602251D8Z APPLIED RESEARCH FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF S&T PRIORITIES 62,200 64,200 Computer modeling of PFAS [2,000] 13 0602303E INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY 442,556 442,556 14 0602383E BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE 34,588 34,588 15 0602384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 202,587 202,587 16 0602668D8Z CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH 15,118 25,118 Academic cyber institutes [10,000] 17 0602702E TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY 337,602 337,602 18 0602715E MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY 223,976 223,976 19 0602716E ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY 332,192 332,192 20 0602718BR COUNTER WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION APPLIED RESEARCH 179,096 179,096 21 0602751D8Z SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE (SEI) APPLIED RESEARCH 9,580 9,580 22 1160401BB SOF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 40,569 40,569 SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH 2,049,458 2,061,458 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 23 0603000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 25,779 25,779 24 0603121D8Z SO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 5,000 5,000 25 0603122D8Z COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 70,517 70,517 26 0603133D8Z FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING 24,970 24,970 28 0603160BR COUNTER WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 340,065 340,065 29 0603176C ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT 14,208 14,208 30 0603178C WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 10,000 10,000 31 0603180C ADVANCED RESEARCH 20,674 20,674 32 0603225D8Z JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 18,773 18,773 33 0603286E ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS 279,741 279,741 34 0603287E SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY 202,606 202,606 35 0603288D8Z ANALYTIC ASSESSMENTS 19,429 19,429 36 0603289D8Z ADVANCED INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS 37,645 37,645 37 0603291D8Z ADVANCED INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS—MHA 14,668 14,668 38 0603294C COMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY 13,600 13,600 40 0603342D8Z DEFENSE INNOVATION UNIT (DIU) 29,398 36,898 Accelerate Artificial Intelligence solutions [7,500] 41 0603375D8Z TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION 60,000 60,000 42 0603384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 172,486 172,486 43 0603527D8Z RETRACT LARCH 159,688 159,688 44 0603618D8Z JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 12,063 12,063 45 0603648D8Z JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS 107,359 89,859 Program reduction [–17,500] 46 0603662D8Z NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES 2,858 2,858 47 0603680D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 96,397 96,397 48 0603680S MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 42,834 42,834 49 0603699D8Z EMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 80,911 70,911 Program reduction [–10,000] 50 0603712S GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS 10,817 10,817 51 0603716D8Z STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM 66,157 76,157 SERDP [10,000] 52 0603720S MICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT 171,771 171,771 53 0603727D8Z JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM 4,846 4,846 54 0603739E ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES 128,616 128,616 55 0603760E COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 232,134 232,134 56 0603766E NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY 512,424 512,424 57 0603767E SENSOR TECHNOLOGY 163,903 163,903 58 0603769D8Z DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 13,723 13,723 59 0603781D8Z SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE 15,111 15,111 60 0603826D8Z QUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS 47,147 47,147 61 0603833D8Z ENGINEERING SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 19,376 19,376 62 0603924D8Z HIGH ENERGY LASER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 85,223 85,223 63 0603941D8Z TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 175,574 185,574 Program increase to support NDS technologies [10,000] 64 0603950D8Z NATIONAL SECURITY INNOVATION NETWORK 25,000 25,000 65 0604055D8Z OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT 70,536 70,536 66 0303310D8Z CWMD SYSTEMS 28,907 28,907 68 1160402BB SOF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 89,154 89,154 69 1206310SDA SPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 20,000 20,000 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 3,742,088 3,742,088 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES 70 0603161D8Z NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E ADC&P 42,695 42,695 71 0603600D8Z WALKOFF 92,791 92,791 72 0603821D8Z ACQUISITION ENTERPRISE DATA & INFORMATION SERVICES 5,659 5,659 73 0603851D8Z ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM 66,572 76,572 ESTCP [10,000] 74 0603881C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT 302,761 302,761 75 0603882C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT 1,156,506 1,156,506 76 0603884BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—DEM/VAL 83,662 83,662 77 0603884C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS 283,487 283,487 78 0603890C BMD ENABLING PROGRAMS 571,507 571,507 79 0603891C SPECIAL PROGRAMS—MDA 377,098 502,098 Classified [125,000] 80 0603892C AEGIS BMD 727,479 727,479 81 0603896C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATI 564,206 564,206 82 0603898C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT 51,532 51,532 83 0603904C MISSILE DEFENSE INTEGRATION & OPERATIONS CENTER (MDIOC) 56,161 56,161 84 0603906C REGARDING TRENCH 22,424 22,424 85 0603907C SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX) 128,156 128,156 86 0603913C ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS 300,000 300,000 87 0603914C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST 395,924 395,924 88 0603915C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS 554,171 554,171 89 0603920D8Z HUMANITARIAN DEMINING 10,820 10,820 90 0603923D8Z COALITION WARFARE 11,316 11,316 91 0604016D8Z DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM 3,365 3,365 92 0604115C TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES 303,458 269,458 Neutral particle beam [–34,000] 93 0604132D8Z MISSILE DEFEAT PROJECT 17,816 17,816 95 0604181C HYPERSONIC DEFENSE 157,425 157,425 96 0604250D8Z ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES 1,312,735 1,343,735 Hypervelocity Gun Weapon System [81,000] Unjustified growth to SCO [–50,000] 97 0604294D8Z TRUSTED & ASSURED MICROELECTRONICS 542,421 547,421 Trusted and assured microelectronics research [5,000] 98 0604331D8Z RAPID PROTOTYPING PROGRAM 100,957 50,957 Uncoordinated prototyping efforts [–50,000] 99 0604341D8Z DEFENSE INNOVATION UNIT (DIU) PROTOTYPING 92,000 92,000 100 0604400D8Z DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) UNMANNED SYSTEM COMMON DEVELOPMENT 3,021 3,021 102 0604672C HOMELAND DEFENSE RADAR—HAWAII (HDR-H) 274,714 274,714 103 0604673C PACIFIC DISCRIMINATING RADAR 6,711 6,711 104 0604682D8Z WARGAMING AND SUPPORT FOR STRATEGIC ANALYSIS (SSA) 3,751 3,751 105 0604775BR DEFENSE RAPID INNOVATION PROGRAM 14,021 14,021 107 0604826J JOINT C5 CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT, INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY ASSESSMENTS 20,062 20,062 108 0604873C LONG RANGE DISCRIMINATION RADAR (LRDR) 136,423 136,423 109 0604874C IMPROVED HOMELAND DEFENSE INTERCEPTORS 412,363 412,363 110 0604876C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT TEST 25,137 25,137 111 0604878C AEGIS BMD TEST 169,822 169,822 112 0604879C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSOR TEST 105,530 105,530 113 0604880C LAND-BASED SM–3 (LBSM3) 38,352 38,352 115 0604887C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE SEGMENT TEST 98,139 98,139 117 0300206R ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS 1,600 1,600 118 0303191D8Z JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) PROGRAM 3,191 3,191 119 0305103C CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE 1,138 1,138 120 1206410SDA SPACE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPING 85,000 55,000 Missile defense studies realignment [–30,000] 121 1206893C SPACE TRACKING & SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM 35,849 35,849 122 1206895C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS 27,565 135,565 HBTSS unfunded requirement [108,000] SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES 9,797,493 9,962,493 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 123 0604161D8Z NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E SDD 11,276 11,276 124 0604165D8Z PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT 107,000 107,000 125 0604384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—EMD 384,047 384,047 126 0604771D8Z JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTIDS) 40,102 40,102 127 0605000BR COUNTER WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 13,100 13,100 128 0605013BL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 3,070 3,070 129 0605021SE HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE 7,295 7,295 130 0605022D8Z DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM 17,615 17,615 131 0605027D8Z OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES 15,653 15,653 132 0605070S DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 2,378 2,378 133 0605075D8Z CMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION 1,618 1,618 134 0605080S DEFENSE AGENCY INITIATIVES (DAI)—FINANCIAL SYSTEM 27,944 27,944 135 0605090S DEFENSE RETIRED AND ANNUITANT PAY SYSTEM (DRAS) 6,609 6,609 136 0605210D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES 9,619 9,619 137 0605294D8Z TRUSTED & ASSURED MICROELECTRONICS 175,032 175,032 138 0303140BL INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 425 425 139 0303141K GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM 1,578 1,578 140 0305304D8Z DOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (EEIM) 4,373 4,373 141 0305310D8Z CWMD SYSTEMS: SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 12,854 12,854 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 841,588 841,588 MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 142 0603829J JOINT CAPABILITY EXPERIMENTATION 13,000 13,000 143 0604774D8Z DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS) 9,724 9,724 144 0604875D8Z JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT 9,593 9,593 145 0604940D8Z CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT (CTEIP) 260,267 260,267 146 0604942D8Z ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS 30,834 30,834 147 0605001E MISSION SUPPORT 68,498 68,498 148 0605100D8Z JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY (JMETC) 83,091 89,091 Cyber range development [6,000] 149 0605104D8Z TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS 18,079 13,079 Program reduction [–5,000] 150 0605126J JOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION (JIAMDO) 70,038 70,038 152 0605142D8Z SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 37,140 32,140 Program reduction [–5,000] 153 0605151D8Z STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—OSD 4,759 4,759 154 0605161D8Z NUCLEAR MATTERS-PHYSICAL SECURITY 8,307 8,307 155 0605170D8Z SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION 9,441 9,441 156 0605200D8Z GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE) 1,700 1,700 157 0605384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 110,363 110,363 166 0605790D8Z SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR)/ SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 3,568 3,568 167 0605797D8Z MAINTAINING TECHNOLOGY ADVANTAGE 19,936 19,936 168 0605798D8Z DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS 16,875 16,875 169 0605801KA DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC) 57,716 57,716 170 0605803SE R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING AND EVALUATION 34,448 34,448 171 0605804D8Z DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION 22,203 22,203 172 0605898E MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D 13,208 13,208 173 0605998KA MANAGEMENT HQ—DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC) 3,027 3,027 174 0606100D8Z BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS 8,017 8,017 175 0606225D8Z ODNA TECHNOLOGY AND RESOURCE ANALYSIS 3,194 3,194 176 0606589D8W DEFENSE DIGITAL SERVICE (DDS) DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT 1,000 6,000 Increase [5,000] 179 0203345D8Z DEFENSE OPERATIONS SECURITY INITIATIVE (DOSI) 3,037 3,037 180 0204571J JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT 9,216 9,216 183 0303166J SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) CAPABILITIES 553 553 184 0303260D8Z DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION PROGRAM OFFICE (DMDPO) 1,014 1,014 185 0305172K COMBINED ADVANCED APPLICATIONS 58,667 58,667 187 0305245D8Z INTELLIGENCE CAPABILITIES AND INNOVATION INVESTMENTS 21,081 21,081 189 0307588D8Z ALGORITHMIC WARFARE CROSS FUNCTIONAL TEAMS 221,235 221,235 191 0804768J COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANSFORMATION (CE2T2)—NON-MHA 40,073 40,073 192 0808709SE DEFENSE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE (DEOMI) 100 100 193 0901598C MANAGEMENT HQ—MDA 27,065 27,065 194 0903235K JOINT SERVICE PROVIDER (JSP) 3,090 3,090 999 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 51,471 51,471 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1,354,628 1,355,628 OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 195 0604130V ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS) 7,945 7,945 196 0604532K JOINT ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 208,834 208,834 197 0605127T REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH (RIO) AND PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE INFORMATION MANA 1,947 1,947 198 0605147T OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED INFORMATION SYSTEM (OHASIS) 310 310 199 0607210D8Z INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT 10,051 48,551 Advanced systems manufacturing [5,000] Composite manufacturing technologies [15,000] Printed circuit boards [15,000] Rare earth element production [3,500] 200 0607310D8Z CWMD SYSTEMS: OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 12,734 12,734 201 0607327T GLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (G-TSCMIS) 14,800 14,800 202 0607384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT) 54,023 54,023 203 0208043J PLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM (PDAS) 4,537 4,537 204 0208045K C4I INTEROPERABILITY 64,122 64,122 210 0302019K DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION 15,798 15,798 211 0303126K LONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DCS 11,166 11,166 212 0303131K MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN) 17,383 17,383 214 0303136G KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI) 54,516 54,516 215 0303140D8Z INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 67,631 67,631 216 0303140G INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 289,080 287,198 Sharkseer transfer [–1,882] 217 0303140K INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM 42,796 44,678 Sharkseer transfer [1,882] 218 0303150K GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM 25,218 25,218 219 0303153K DEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION 21,698 21,698 220 0303228K JOINT REGIONAL SECURITY STACKS (JRSS) 18,077 18,077 222 0303430K FEDERAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 44,001 44,001 228 0305128V SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES 2,400 17,400 Local criminal records access [15,000] 232 0305186D8Z POLICY R&D PROGRAMS 6,301 6,301 233 0305199D8Z NET CENTRICITY 21,384 21,384 235 0305208BB DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 6,359 6,359 238 0305208K DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS 2,981 2,981 241 0305327V INSIDER THREAT 1,964 1,964 242 0305387D8Z HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM 2,221 2,221 250 0708012K LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 1,361 1,361 251 0708012S PACIFIC DISASTER CENTERS 1,770 1,770 252 0708047S DEFENSE PROPERTY ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM 3,679 3,679 254 1105219BB MQ–9 UAV 20,697 20,697 256 1160403BB AVIATION SYSTEMS 245,795 254,595 UPL Future vertical lift [8,800] 257 1160405BB INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 15,484 15,484 258 1160408BB OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS 166,922 166,922 259 1160431BB WARRIOR SYSTEMS 62,332 62,332 260 1160432BB SPECIAL PROGRAMS 21,805 21,805 261 1160434BB UNMANNED ISR 37,377 37,377 262 1160480BB SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES 11,150 11,150 263 1160483BB MARITIME SYSTEMS 72,626 72,626 264 1160489BB GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES 5,363 5,363 265 1160490BB OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE 12,962 12,962 266 1203610K TELEPORT PROGRAM 6,158 6,158 300 0604011D8Z NEXT GENERATION INFORMATION COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY (5G) 0 25,000 DOD Spectrum Sharing program [25,000] 999 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 4,116,640 4,542,640 Transfer back to base funding [426,000] SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 5,832,398 6,345,698 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW 24,346,953 25,060,253 OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1 0605118OTE OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION 93,291 93,291 2 0605131OTE LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION 69,172 69,172 3 0605814OTE OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES 58,737 58,737 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 221,200 221,200 TOTAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE 221,200 221,200 TOTAL RDT&E 102,647,545 104,023,113 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION Line Program Item FY 2020 Senate RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 74 0603327A AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 500 500 79 0603747A SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY 3,000 3,000 85 0603804A LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV 1,085 1,085 95 0604117A MANEUVER—SHORT RANGE AIR DEFENSE (M-SHORAD) 6,000 6,000 97 0604119A ARMY ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPING 4,529 4,529 105 0604785A INTEGRATED BASE DEFENSE (BUDGET ACTIVITY 4) 2,000 2,000 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 17,114 17,114 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 151 0605035A COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) 11,770 11,770 159 0605051A AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY DEVELOPMENT 77,420 77,420 163 0605203A ARMY SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 19,527 19,527 174 0304270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 3,200 3,200 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 111,917 111,917 RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 200 0606003A COUNTERINTEL AND HUMAN INTEL MODERNIZATION 1,875 1,875 SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1,875 1,875 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 238 0303028A SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES 22,904 22,904 246 0305204A TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES 34,100 34,100 247 0305206A AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS 14,000 14,000 252 0307665A BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE 2,214 2,214 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 73,218 73,218 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY 204,124 204,124 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 28 0603207N AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS 2,400 2,400 38 0603527N RETRACT LARCH 22,000 22,000 57 0603654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT 14,178 14,178 69 0603795N LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY 1,428 1,428 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 40,006 40,006 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 143 0604755N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) 1,122 1,122 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 1,122 1,122 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 228 0206313M MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 15,000 15,000 999 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 108,282 108,282 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 123,282 123,282 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY 164,410 164,410 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 48 0604858F TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM 26,450 26,450 72 1206857F SPACE RAPID CAPABILITIES OFFICE 17,885 17,885 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 44,335 44,335 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 177 0205671F JOINT COUNTER RCIED ELECTRONIC WARFARE 4,000 4,000 217 0208288F INTEL DATA APPLICATIONS 1,200 1,200 999 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 400,713 78,713 Transfer back to base funding [–322,000] SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 405,913 83,913 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF 450,248 128,248 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW APPLIED RESEARCH 10 0602134BR COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT ADVANCED STUDIES 1,677 1,677 SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH 1,677 1,677 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 25 0603122D8Z COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 25,230 25,230 27 0603134BR COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT SIMULATION 49,528 49,528 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 74,758 74,758 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES 94 0604134BR COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT DEMONSTRATION, PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT, AND TESTING 113,590 113,590 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES 113,590 113,590 OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 258 1160408BB OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS 726 726 259 1160431BB WARRIOR SYSTEMS 6,000 6,000 261 1160434BB UNMANNED ISR 5,000 5,000 999 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 626,199 200,199 Transfer back to base funding [–426,000] SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 637,925 211,925 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW 827,950 401,950 TOTAL RDT&E 1,646,732 898,732 XLIII OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Line Item FY 2020 Senate OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY OPERATING FORCES 010 MANEUVER UNITS 0 1,735,922 Transfer back to base funding [1,735,922] 020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES 0 127,815 Transfer back to base funding [127,815] 030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE 0 716,356 Transfer back to base funding [716,356] 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 0 890,891 Transfer back to base funding [890,891] 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 0 1,232,477 Transfer back to base funding [1,232,477] 060 AVIATION ASSETS 0 1,355,606 Transfer back to base funding [1,355,606] 070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 408,031 3,882,315 Transfer back to base funding [3,474,284] 080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS 417,069 446,269 UPL MDTF INDOPACOM [29,200] 090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE 0 1,633,327 Transfer back to base funding [1,633,327] 100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 0 7,951,473 Historical underexecution [–46,000] Revised MHPI cost share [–50,460] Transfer back to base funding [8,047,933] 110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 4,326,840 4,326,840 120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 405,612 405,612 160 US AFRICA COMMAND 251,511 251,511 170 US EUROPEAN COMMAND 146,358 154,158 JIOCEUR JAC Molesworth [7,800] 180 US SOUTHERN COMMAND 191,840 191,840 190 US FORCES KOREA 57,603 57,603 200 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 423,156 423,156 210 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSECURITY 551,185 551,185 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 7,179,205 26,334,356 MOBILIZATION 220 STRATEGIC MOBILITY 380,577 380,577 230 ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS 362,942 362,942 240 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS 4,637 4,637 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION 748,156 748,156 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 250 OFFICER ACQUISITION 157,175 157,175 260 RECRUIT TRAINING 55,739 55,739 270 ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING 62,300 62,300 280 SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS 538,357 538,357 290 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 969,813 969,813 300 FLIGHT TRAINING 1,234,049 1,234,049 310 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 218,338 218,338 320 TRAINING SUPPORT 554,659 554,659 330 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 716,056 636,056 Unjustified growth for advertising [–70,000] Unjustified growth for recruiting [–10,000] 340 EXAMINING 185,034 185,034 350 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 214,275 214,275 360 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING 147,647 147,647 370 JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS 173,812 173,812 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 5,227,254 5,147,254 ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 390 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 559,229 559,229 400 CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES 929,944 929,944 410 LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 629,981 629,981 420 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT 458,771 458,771 430 ADMINISTRATION 428,768 428,768 440 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 1,512,736 1,512,736 450 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT 272,738 272,738 460 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT 391,869 363,869 Historical underexecution [–28,000] 470 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT 1,901,165 1,901,165 480 ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES 198,765 183,765 Historical underexecution [–15,000] 490 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT 226,248 226,248 500 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT READINESS 315,489 315,489 510 INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS 427,254 427,254 520 MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS 43,248 43,248 9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 1,347,053 1,347,053 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 9,643,258 9,600,258 UNDISTRIBUTED 999 UNDISTRIBUTED 0 103,800 Cyber operations-peculiar capability development projects [3,000] Single family home pilot program [1,000] THAAD sustainment program transfer from MDA [99,800] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 0 103,800 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY 22,797,873 41,933,824 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES OPERATING FORCES 010 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES 0 11,927 Transfer back to base funding [11,927] 020 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE 0 533,015 Transfer back to base funding [533,015] 030 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 0 119,517 Transfer back to base funding [119,517] 040 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 0 550,468 Transfer back to base funding [550,468] 050 AVIATION ASSETS 0 86,670 Transfer back to base funding [86,670] 060 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 390,061 390,061 070 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS 101,890 101,890 080 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE 0 48,503 Transfer back to base funding [48,503] 090 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 0 598,907 Transfer back to base funding [598,907] 100 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 444,376 444,376 110 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 22,095 22,095 120 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 3,288 3,288 130 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSECURITY 7,655 7,655 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 969,365 2,918,372 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 140 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 14,533 14,533 150 ADMINISTRATION 17,231 17,231 160 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 14,304 14,304 170 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT 6,129 6,129 180 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 58,541 58,541 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 110,738 110,738 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES 1,080,103 3,029,110 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG OPERATING FORCES 010 MANEUVER UNITS 0 805,671 Transfer back to base funding [805,671] 020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES 0 195,334 Transfer back to base funding [195,334] 030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE 0 771,048 Transfer back to base funding [771,048] 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 0 94,726 Transfer back to base funding [94,726] 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 0 33,696 Transfer back to base funding [33,696] 060 AVIATION ASSETS 0 981,819 Transfer back to base funding [981,819] 070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 743,206 743,206 080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS 50,963 50,963 090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE 0 258,278 Transfer back to base funding [258,278] 100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 0 1,153,076 Transfer back to base funding [1,153,076] 110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 1,113,475 1,120,675 Damage assessment [7,200] 120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1,001,042 1,001,042 130 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 8,448 8,448 140 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSECURITY 7,768 7,768 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 2,924,902 7,225,750 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 150 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 9,890 9,890 160 ADMINISTRATION 71,070 71,070 170 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 68,213 68,213 180 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT 8,628 8,628 190 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT 250,376 247,376 Unjustified growth for marketing [–1,500] Unjustified growth for recruiting [–1,500] 200 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT 2,676 2,676 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 410,853 407,853 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG 3,335,755 7,633,603 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY OPERATING FORCES 010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS 0 2,877,800 Transfer back to base funding [2,877,800] 020 FLEET AIR TRAINING 2,284,828 2,284,828 030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES 0 59,299 Transfer back to base funding [59,299] 040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT 155,896 155,896 050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT 719,107 719,107 060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE 0 1,154,181 Transfer back to base funding [1,154,181] 070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 60,402 60,402 080 AVIATION LOGISTICS 1,241,421 1,241,421 090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS 0 4,097,262 Transfer back to base funding [4,097,262] 100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING 1,031,792 1,031,792 110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE 0 8,875,298 Transfer back to base funding [8,061,298] UPL SSN and Ship maintenance increase [814,000] 120 SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 0 2,073,641 Transfer back to base funding [2,073,641] 130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE 1,378,856 1,378,856 140 SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE 276,245 276,245 150 WARFARE TACTICS 675,209 675,209 160 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY 389,516 389,516 170 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES 1,536,310 1,536,310 180 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 161,579 161,579 190 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS 59,521 59,521 200 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT 93,978 98,978 Posture site assessments INDOPACOM [5,000] 210 MILITARY INFORMATION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 8,641 8,641 220 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 496,385 496,385 230 FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE 1,423,339 1,423,339 240 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE 924,069 924,069 250 OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT 540,210 540,210 260 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION 1,131,627 1,131,627 270 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION 3,029,634 3,029,634 280 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 0 4,433,783 Revised MHPI cost share [18,840] Transfer back to base funding [4,414,943] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 17,618,565 41,194,829 MOBILIZATION 290 SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE 942,902 942,902 300 READY RESERVE FORCE 352,044 352,044 310 SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS 427,555 427,555 320 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS 137,597 137,597 330 COAST GUARD SUPPORT 24,604 24,604 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION 1,884,702 1,884,702 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 340 OFFICER ACQUISITION 150,765 150,765 350 RECRUIT TRAINING 11,584 11,584 360 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS 159,133 159,133 370 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 911,316 911,316 380 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 185,211 185,211 390 TRAINING SUPPORT 267,224 267,224 400 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 209,252 189,252 Unjustified growth [–20,000] 410 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 88,902 88,902 420 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING 67,492 67,492 430 JUNIOR ROTC 55,164 55,164 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 2,106,043 2,086,043 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 440 ADMINISTRATION 1,143,358 1,092,358 Decrease [–1,000] Unjustified audit growth [–50,000] 450 CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 178,342 178,342 460 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 418,413 418,413 490 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 157,465 157,465 510 PLANNING, ENGINEERING, AND PROGRAM SUPPORT 485,397 490,397 REPO [5,000] 520 ACQUISITION, LOGISTICS, AND OVERSIGHT 654,137 654,137 530 INVESTIGATIVE AND SECURITY SERVICES 718,061 718,061 9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 588,235 591,535 Transfer back to base funding [3,300] SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 4,343,408 4,300,708 UNDISTRIBUTED 999 UNDISTRIBUTED 0 3,000 Cyber operations-peculiar capability development projects [3,000] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 0 3,000 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY 25,952,718 49,469,282 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS OPERATING FORCES 010 OPERATIONAL FORCES 0 968,224 Transfer back to base funding [968,224] 020 FIELD LOGISTICS 1,278,533 1,278,533 030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE 0 232,991 Transfer back to base funding [232,991] 040 MARITIME PREPOSITIONING 0 100,396 Transfer back to base funding [100,396] 050 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 203,580 203,580 060 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 1,115,742 1,559,034 Transfer back to base funding [443,292] 070 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 0 2,253,776 Transfer back to base funding [2,253,776] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 2,597,855 6,596,534 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 080 RECRUIT TRAINING 21,240 21,240 090 OFFICER ACQUISITION 1,168 1,168 100 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 106,601 106,601 110 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 49,095 49,095 120 TRAINING SUPPORT 407,315 407,315 130 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 210,475 210,475 140 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 42,810 42,810 150 JUNIOR ROTC 25,183 25,183 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 863,887 863,887 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 160 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 29,894 29,894 170 ADMINISTRATION 384,352 384,352 9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 52,057 52,057 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 466,303 466,303 UNDISTRIBUTED 999 UNDISTRIBUTED 0 3,000 Cyber operations-peculiar capability development [3,000] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 0 3,000 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS 3,928,045 7,929,724 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES OPERATING FORCES 010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS 0 654,220 Transfer back to base funding [654,220] 020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE 8,767 8,767 030 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE 0 108,236 Transfer back to base funding [108,236] 040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 463 463 050 AVIATION LOGISTICS 26,014 26,014 060 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING 583 583 070 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 17,883 17,883 080 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES 128,079 128,079 090 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 356 356 100 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION 26,133 26,133 110 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION 35,397 35,397 120 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 0 101,376 Transfer back to base funding [101,376] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 243,675 1,107,507 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 130 ADMINISTRATION 1,888 1,888 140 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 12,778 12,778 150 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 2,943 2,943 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 17,609 17,609 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES 261,284 1,125,116 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 010 OPERATING FORCES 0 106,484 Transfer back to base funding [106,484] 020 DEPOT MAINTENANCE 0 18,429 Transfer back to base funding [18,429] 030 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION 47,516 47,516 040 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 0 106,073 Transfer back to base funding [106,073] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 47,516 278,502 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 050 ADMINISTRATION 13,574 13,574 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 13,574 13,574 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE 61,090 292,076 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE OPERATING FORCES 010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES 729,127 729,127 020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES 1,318,770 1,318,770 030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS) 1,486,790 1,486,790 040 DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 0 3,334,792 Transfer back to base funding [3,334,792] 050 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 3,675,824 4,142,435 Transfer back to base funding [466,611] 060 CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT 0 228,811 Transfer back to base funding [228,811] 070 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT 0 8,329,364 Transfer back to base funding [8,329,364] 080 FLYING HOUR PROGRAM 0 4,048,773 Transfer back to base funding [4,048,773] 090 BASE SUPPORT 0 7,191,582 Revised MHPI cost share [–32,400] Transfer back to base funding [7,223,982] 100 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING 964,553 964,553 110 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS 1,032,307 1,032,307 120 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 670,076 670,076 140 LAUNCH FACILITIES 179,980 179,980 150 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS 467,990 467,990 160 US NORTHCOM/NORAD 184,655 184,655 170 US STRATCOM 478,357 478,357 180 US CYBERCOM 323,121 347,921 Accelerate development Cyber National Mission Force capabilities [1,500] Cyber National Mission Force Mobile & Modular Hunt Forward Kit [5,300] ETERNALDARKNESS [18,000] 190 US CENTCOM 160,989 160,989 200 US SOCOM 6,225 6,225 210 US TRANSCOM 544 544 220 CENTCOM CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT 2,073 2,073 230 USSPACECOM 70,588 70,588 9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 1,322,944 1,322,944 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 13,074,913 36,699,646 MOBILIZATION 240 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS 1,158,142 1,158,142 250 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS 138,672 138,672 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION 1,296,814 1,296,814 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 260 OFFICER ACQUISITION 130,835 130,835 270 RECRUIT TRAINING 26,021 26,021 280 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) 121,391 121,391 290 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 454,539 454,539 300 FLIGHT TRAINING 600,565 600,565 310 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 282,788 282,788 320 TRAINING SUPPORT 123,988 123,988 330 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 167,731 161,731 Unjustified growth [–6,000] 340 EXAMINING 4,576 4,576 350 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION 211,911 211,911 360 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING 219,021 219,021 370 JUNIOR ROTC 62,092 62,092 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 2,405,458 2,399,458 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 380 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS 664,926 664,926 390 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 101,483 101,483 400 ADMINISTRATION 892,480 892,480 410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 152,532 152,532 420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 1,254,089 1,254,089 430 CIVIL AIR PATROL 30,070 30,070 460 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT 136,110 136,110 9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 1,269,624 1,269,624 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 4,501,314 4,501,314 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, SPACE FORCE OPERATING FORCES 010 BASE SUPPORT 72,436 72,436 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 72,436 72,436 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, SPACE FORCE 72,436 72,436 UNDISTRIBUTED 999 UNDISTRIBUTED 0 3,000 Cyber operations-peculiar capability development projects [3,000] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 0 3,000 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE 21,278,499 44,900,232 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES 1,781,413 1,781,413 020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 209,650 209,650 030 DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 0 494,235 Transfer back to base funding [494,235] 040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 128,746 128,746 050 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT 0 256,512 Transfer back to base funding [256,512] 060 BASE SUPPORT 0 414,626 Transfer back to base funding [414,626] 070 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 1,673 1,673 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 2,121,482 3,286,855 ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 080 ADMINISTRATION 69,436 69,436 090 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 22,124 22,124 100 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC) 10,946 10,946 110 OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP) 7,009 7,009 120 AUDIOVISUAL 448 448 SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 109,963 109,963 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE 2,231,445 3,396,818 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG OPERATING FORCES 010 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS 2,497,967 2,497,967 020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 600,377 600,377 030 DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 0 879,467 Transfer back to base funding [879,467] 040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 400,734 400,734 050 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT 0 1,299,089 Transfer back to base funding [1,299,089] 060 BASE SUPPORT 0 911,775 Transfer back to base funding [911,775] 070 CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT 0 24,742 Transfer back to base funding [24,742] 080 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 25,507 25,507 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 3,524,585 6,639,658 ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES 090 ADMINISTRATION 47,215 47,215 100 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING 40,356 40,356 SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES 87,571 87,571 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG 3,612,156 6,727,229 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE OPERATING FORCES 010 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF 409,542 409,542 020 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF—CE2T2 579,179 579,179 030 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF—CYBER 24,598 24,598 040 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND COMBAT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES 1,075,762 1,075,762 050 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 14,409 14,409 060 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND INTELLIGENCE 501,747 501,747 070 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND MAINTENANCE 559,300 559,300 080 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND MANAGEMENT/OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 177,928 177,928 090 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND OPERATIONAL SUPPORT 925,262 925,262 100 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND THEATER FORCES 2,764,738 2,764,738 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 7,032,465 7,032,465 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 120 DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY 180,250 180,250 130 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF 100,610 100,610 140 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 33,967 33,967 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 314,827 314,827 ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 160 CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS 165,707 195,007 IRT Increase [14,300] Starbase [15,000] 180 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY 627,467 627,467 190 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY—CYBER 3,362 3,362 200 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY 1,438,068 1,438,068 210 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY—CYBER 24,391 24,391 220 DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY 892,438 892,438 230 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY 2,012,885 2,007,885 MilCloud [–5,000] 240 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY—CYBER 601,223 636,360 Sharkseer transfer [35,137] 270 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY 34,632 34,632 280 DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY 415,699 415,699 290 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY 202,792 202,792 300 DEFENSE PERSONNEL ACCOUNTING AGENCY 144,881 144,881 310 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY 696,884 696,884 Assessment, monitoring, and evaluation [11,000] Security cooperation account [–11,000] 320 DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE 889,664 899,664 Consolidated Adjudication Facility [10,000] 340 DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE—CYBER 9,220 9,220 360 DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER 3,000 3,000 370 DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 35,626 35,626 380 DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY 568,133 568,133 400 DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY—CYBER 13,339 13,339 410 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY 2,932,226 2,982,226 Impact aid for children with severe disabilities [10,000] Impact aid for schools with military dependent students [40,000] 420 MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY 522,529 422,729 THAAD program transfer to Army [–99,800] 450 OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT 59,513 59,513 460 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1,604,738 1,678,738 Bien Hoa dioxin cleanup [15,000] CDC study [10,000] Emerging contaminants [1,000] Industrial policy implementation of EO13806 [15,000] Interstate compacts for licensure and credentialing [4,000] National Commission on Military Aviation Safety [3,000] National Commission on Military, National, and Public Service [1,000] Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration [25,000] 470 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE—CYBER 48,783 48,783 480 SPACE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 44,750 44,750 500 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES 324,001 329,001 Defense Digital Service Hires [5,000] 9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 15,736,098 15,781,461 Sharkseer transfer [–35,137] Transfer back to base funding [80,500] SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 30,052,049 30,196,049 TOTAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE 37,399,341 37,543,341 MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE 010 US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE 14,771 14,771 SUBTOTAL US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE 14,771 14,771 OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID 010 OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID 108,600 108,600 SUBTOTAL OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID 108,600 108,600 COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 010 COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 338,700 338,700 SUBTOTAL COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 338,700 338,700 ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD 010 ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD 400,000 400,000 SUBTOTAL ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD 400,000 400,000 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY 050 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY 207,518 207,518 SUBTOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY 207,518 207,518 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY 060 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY 335,932 335,932 SUBTOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY 335,932 335,932 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE 070 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE 302,744 302,744 SUBTOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE 302,744 302,744 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE 080 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE 9,105 9,105 SUBTOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE 9,105 9,105 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES 090 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES 216,499 216,499 SUBTOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES 216,499 216,499 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 1,933,869 1,933,869 UNDISTRIBUTED UNDISTRIBUTED 999 UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –590,000 Foreign currency fluctuation fund reduction [–607,000] JROTC [25,000] Printing inefficiencies [–8,000] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –590,000 TOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED 0 –590,000 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE 123,944,614 205,396,660 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS Line Item FY 2020 Senate OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY OPERATING FORCES 010 MANEUVER UNITS 3,146,796 1,410,874 Transfer back to base funding [–1,735,922] 020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES 127,815 0 Transfer back to base funding [–127,815] 030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE 742,858 26,502 Transfer back to base funding [–716,356] 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 3,165,381 2,274,490 Transfer back to base funding [–890,891] 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 1,368,765 136,288 Transfer back to base funding [–1,232,477] 060 AVIATION ASSETS 1,655,846 300,240 Transfer back to base funding [–1,355,606] 070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 6,889,293 3,415,009 Transfer back to base funding [–3,474,284] 080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS 29,985 29,985 090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE 1,720,258 86,931 Transfer back to base funding [–1,633,327] 100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 8,163,639 115,706 Transfer back to base funding [–8,047,933] 110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 72,657 72,657 130 ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES 6,397,586 6,397,586 140 COMMANDER'S EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM 5,000 5,000 150 RESET 1,048,896 1,048,896 160 US AFRICA COMMAND 203,174 203,174 170 US EUROPEAN COMMAND 173,676 173,676 200 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS 188,529 188,529 210 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSECURITY 5,682 5,682 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 35,105,836 15,891,225 MOBILIZATION 230 ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS 131,954 131,954 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION 131,954 131,954 ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 390 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 721,014 721,014 400 CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES 66,845 66,845 410 LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 9,309 9,309 420 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT 23,653 23,653 460 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT 109,019 109,019 490 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT 251,355 251,355 9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 1,568,564 1,568,564 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 2,749,759 2,749,759 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY 37,987,549 18,772,938 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES OPERATING FORCES 010 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES 11,927 0 Transfer back to base funding [–11,927] 020 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE 553,455 20,440 Transfer back to base funding [–533,015] 030 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 119,517 0 Transfer back to base funding [–119,517] 040 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 550,468 0 Transfer back to base funding [–550,468] 050 AVIATION ASSETS 86,670 0 Transfer back to base funding [–86,670] 060 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 689 689 080 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE 48,503 0 Transfer back to base funding [–48,503] 090 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 615,370 16,463 Transfer back to base funding [–598,907] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 1,986,599 37,592 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES 1,986,599 37,592 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG OPERATING FORCES 010 MANEUVER UNITS 851,567 45,896 Transfer back to base funding [–805,671] 020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES 195,514 180 Transfer back to base funding [–195,334] 030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE 774,030 2,982 Transfer back to base funding [–771,048] 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS 95,274 548 Transfer back to base funding [–94,726] 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT 33,696 0 Transfer back to base funding [–33,696] 060 AVIATION ASSETS 991,048 9,229 Transfer back to base funding [–981,819] 070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT 1,584 1,584 090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE 258,278 0 Transfer back to base funding [–258,278] 100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 1,175,139 22,063 Transfer back to base funding [–1,153,076] 120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 606 606 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 4,376,736 83,088 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 170 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 203 203 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 203 203 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG 4,376,939 83,291 AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND AFGHAN NATIONAL ARMY 090 SUSTAINMENT 1,313,047 1,313,047 100 INFRASTRUCTURE 37,152 37,152 110 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION 120,868 120,868 120 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS 118,591 118,591 SUBTOTAL AFGHAN NATIONAL ARMY 1,589,658 1,589,658 AFGHAN NATIONAL POLICE 130 SUSTAINMENT 422,806 422,806 140 INFRASTRUCTURE 2,358 2,358 150 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION 127,081 127,081 160 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS 108,112 108,112 SUBTOTAL AFGHAN NATIONAL POLICE 660,357 660,357 AFGHAN AIR FORCE 170 SUSTAINMENT 893,829 893,829 180 INFRASTRUCTURE 8,611 8,611 190 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION 566,967 566,967 200 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS 356,108 356,108 SUBTOTAL AFGHAN AIR FORCE 1,825,515 1,825,515 AFGHAN SPECIAL SECURITY FORCES 210 SUSTAINMENT 437,909 437,909 220 INFRASTRUCTURE 21,131 21,131 230 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION 153,806 153,806 240 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS 115,602 115,602 SUBTOTAL AFGHAN SPECIAL SECURITY FORCES 728,448 728,448 TOTAL AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND 4,803,978 4,803,978 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY OPERATING FORCES 010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS 5,682,156 2,804,356 Transfer back to base funding [–2,877,800] 030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES 60,115 816 Transfer back to base funding [–59,299] 040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT 9,582 9,582 050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT 197,262 197,262 060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE 1,322,427 168,246 Transfer back to base funding [–1,154,181] 070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 3,594 3,594 080 AVIATION LOGISTICS 10,618 10,618 090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS 5,582,370 1,485,108 Transfer back to base funding [–4,097,262] 100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING 20,334 20,334 110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE 10,426,913 2,365,615 Transfer back to base funding [–8,061,298] 120 SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 2,073,641 0 Transfer back to base funding [–2,073,641] 130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE 58,092 58,092 140 SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE 18,000 18,000 150 WARFARE TACTICS 16,984 16,984 160 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY 29,382 29,382 170 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES 608,870 608,870 180 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT 7,799 7,799 200 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT 24,800 24,800 220 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 363 363 240 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE 486,188 486,188 250 OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT 12,189 12,189 270 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION 68,667 68,667 280 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 4,634,042 219,099 Transfer back to base funding [–4,414,943] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 31,354,388 8,615,964 MOBILIZATION 320 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS 17,580 17,580 330 COAST GUARD SUPPORT 190,000 190,000 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION 207,580 207,580 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 370 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 52,161 52,161 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 52,161 52,161 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 440 ADMINISTRATION 8,475 8,475 460 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 7,653 7,653 490 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 70,683 70,683 520 ACQUISITION, LOGISTICS, AND OVERSIGHT 11,130 11,130 530 INVESTIGATIVE AND SECURITY SERVICES 1,559 1,559 9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 21,054 17,754 Transfer back to base funding [–3,300] SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 120,554 117,254 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY 31,734,683 8,992,959 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS OPERATING FORCES 010 OPERATIONAL FORCES 1,682,877 714,653 Transfer back to base funding [–968,224] 020 FIELD LOGISTICS 232,508 232,508 030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE 287,092 54,101 Transfer back to base funding [–232,991] 040 MARITIME PREPOSITIONING 100,396 0 Transfer back to base funding [–100,396] 050 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 2,000 2,000 060 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 443,292 340,000 Disaster recovery increase [340,000] Transfer back to base funding [–443,292] 070 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 2,278,346 24,570 Transfer back to base funding [–2,253,776] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 5,026,511 1,367,832 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 120 TRAINING SUPPORT 30,459 30,459 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 30,459 30,459 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 160 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 61,400 61,400 9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 5,100 5,100 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 66,500 66,500 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS 5,123,470 1,464,791 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES OPERATING FORCES 010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS 654,220 0 Transfer back to base funding [–654,220] 020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE 510 510 030 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE 119,864 11,628 Transfer back to base funding [–108,236] 080 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES 10,898 10,898 120 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 101,376 0 Transfer back to base funding [–101,376] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 886,868 23,036 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES 886,868 23,036 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 010 OPERATING FORCES 114,111 7,627 Transfer back to base funding [–106,484] 020 DEPOT MAINTENANCE 18,429 0 Transfer back to base funding [–18,429] 040 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT 107,153 1,080 Transfer back to base funding [–106,073] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 239,693 8,707 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE 239,693 8,707 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE OPERATING FORCES 010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES 163,632 163,632 020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES 1,049,170 1,049,170 030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS) 111,808 111,808 040 DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 3,743,491 408,699 Transfer back to base funding [–3,334,792] 050 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION 613,875 487,264 Disaster recovery increase [340,000] Transfer back to base funding [–466,611] 060 CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT 238,872 10,061 Transfer back to base funding [–228,811] 070 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT 9,282,958 953,594 Transfer back to base funding [–8,329,364] 080 FLYING HOUR PROGRAM 6,544,039 2,495,266 Transfer back to base funding [–4,048,773] 090 BASE SUPPORT 8,762,102 1,538,120 Transfer back to base funding [–7,223,982] 100 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING 13,863 13,863 110 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS 272,020 272,020 120 CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES 17,657 17,657 130 TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 36,098 36,098 140 LAUNCH FACILITIES 391 391 150 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS 39,990 39,990 160 US NORTHCOM/NORAD 725 725 170 US STRATCOM 926 926 180 US CYBERCOM 35,189 35,189 190 US CENTCOM 163,015 163,015 200 US SOCOM 19,000 19,000 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 31,108,821 7,816,488 MOBILIZATION 240 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS 1,271,439 1,271,439 250 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS 109,682 109,682 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION 1,381,121 1,381,121 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 260 OFFICER ACQUISITION 200 200 270 RECRUIT TRAINING 352 352 290 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING 26,802 26,802 300 FLIGHT TRAINING 844 844 310 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION 1,199 1,199 320 TRAINING SUPPORT 1,320 1,320 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING 30,717 30,717 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 380 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS 164,701 164,701 390 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 11,608 11,608 400 ADMINISTRATION 4,814 4,814 410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS 145,204 145,204 420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 98,841 98,841 460 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT 29,890 29,890 9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 52,995 52,995 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 508,053 508,053 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE 33,028,712 9,736,379 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 030 DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 518,423 24,188 Transfer back to base funding [–494,235] 050 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT 256,512 0 Transfer back to base funding [–256,512] 060 BASE SUPPORT 420,196 5,570 Transfer back to base funding [–414,626] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 1,195,131 29,758 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE 1,195,131 29,758 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG OPERATING FORCES 020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS 3,666 3,666 030 DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 946,411 66,944 Transfer back to base funding [–879,467] 050 CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT 1,392,709 93,620 Transfer back to base funding [–1,299,089] 060 BASE SUPPORT 924,454 12,679 Transfer back to base funding [–911,775] 070 CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT 24,742 0 Transfer back to base funding [–24,742] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 3,291,982 176,909 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG 3,291,982 176,909 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE OPERATING FORCES 010 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF 21,866 21,866 020 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF—CE2T2 6,634 6,634 040 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND COMBAT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES 1,121,580 1,121,580 060 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND INTELLIGENCE 1,328,201 1,328,201 070 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND MAINTENANCE 399,845 399,845 090 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND OPERATIONAL SUPPORT 138,458 138,458 100 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND THEATER FORCES 808,729 808,729 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES 3,825,313 3,825,313 ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 180 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY 1,810 1,810 200 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY 21,723 21,723 230 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY 81,133 81,133 240 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY—CYBER 3,455 3,455 270 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY 196,124 196,124 290 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY 14,377 14,377 310 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY 1,927,217 1,977,217 Security cooperation account, unjustified growth [–100,000] Transfer from CTEF Iraq [100,000] Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative [50,000] 380 DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY 317,558 317,558 410 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY 31,620 31,620 460 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 16,666 16,666 500 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES 6,331 6,331 9999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 2,005,285 1,924,785 Transfer back to base funding [–80,500] SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 4,623,299 4,592,799 TOTAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE 8,448,612 8,418,112 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE 133,104,216 52,548,450 XLIV MILITARY PERSONNEL 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL Item FY 2020 Senate MILITARY PERSONNEL MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS 143,476,503 142,557,523 Historical under execution [–918,980] SUBTOTAL MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS 143,476,503 142,557,523 MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 7,816,815 7,816,815 SUBTOTAL MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 7,816,815 7,816,815 TOTAL MILITARY PERSONNEL 151,293,318 150,374,338 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS Item FY 2020 Senate MILITARY PERSONNEL MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS 4,485,808 4,485,808 SUBTOTAL MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS 4,485,808 4,485,808 TOTAL MILITARY PERSONNEL 4,485,808 4,485,808 XLV OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS Line Item FY 2020 Senate WORKING CAPITAL FUND WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY 010 INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS 57,467 57,467 020 SUPPLY MANAGEMENT—ARMY 32,130 32,130 SUBTOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY 89,597 89,597 WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE 020 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 92,499 102,499 Energy optimization initiatives [10,000] SUBTOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE 92,499 102,499 WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE 010 SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT—DEF 49,085 49,085 SUBTOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE 49,085 49,085 WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA 010 WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA 995,030 995,030 SUBTOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA 995,030 995,030 WCF, DEF COUNTERINTELLIGENCE & SECURITY AGENCY 010 DEFENSE COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY AGENCY 200,000 200,000 SUBTOTAL WCF, DEF COUNTERINTELLIGENCE & SECURITY AGENCY 200,000 200,000 TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND 1,426,211 1,436,211 CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION 1 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 107,351 107,351 2 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 875,930 875,930 3 PROCUREMENT 2,218 2,218 SUBTOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION 985,499 985,499 TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION 985,499 985,499 DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER DRUG ACTIVITIES 010 COUNTER-NARCOTICS SUPPORT 581,739 581,739 SUBTOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER DRUG ACTIVITIES 581,739 581,739 DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM 020 DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM 120,922 120,922 SUBTOTAL DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM 120,922 120,922 NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG PROGRAM 030 NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG PROGRAM 91,370 91,370 SUBTOTAL NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG PROGRAM 91,370 91,370 NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG SCHOOLS 040 NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG SCHOOLS 5,371 5,371 SUBTOTAL NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG SCHOOLS 5,371 5,371 TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF 799,402 799,402 OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 010 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 359,022 359,022 020 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—CYBER 1,179 1,179 030 RDT&E 2,965 2,965 040 PROCUREMENT 333 333 SUBTOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 363,499 363,499 TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 363,499 363,499 DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM OPERATION & MAINTENANCE 010 IN-HOUSE CARE 9,570,615 9,570,615 020 PRIVATE SECTOR CARE 15,041,006 15,052,006 Contraceptive cost-sharing [11,000] 030 CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT 1,975,536 1,975,536 040 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 2,004,588 2,004,588 050 MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES 333,246 333,246 060 EDUCATION AND TRAINING 793,810 793,810 070 BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS 2,093,289 2,093,289 SUBTOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE 31,812,090 31,823,090 RDT&E 080 R&D RESEARCH 12,621 12,621 090 R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT 84,266 84,266 100 R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT 279,766 279,766 110 R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION 128,055 128,055 120 R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT 143,527 143,527 130 R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT 67,219 67,219 140 R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT 16,819 16,819 SUBTOTAL RDT&E 732,273 732,273 PROCUREMENT 150 PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING 26,135 26,135 160 PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION 225,774 225,774 170 PROC JOINT OPERATIONAL MEDICINE INFORMATION SYSTEM 314 314 180 PROC MILITARY HEALTH SYSTEM—DESKTOP TO DATACENTER 73,010 73,010 190 PROC DOD HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MODERNIZATION 129,091 129,091 SUBTOTAL PROCUREMENT 454,324 454,324 TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 32,998,687 33,009,687 TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 36,573,298 36,594,298 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS Line Item FY 2020 Senate WORKING CAPITAL FUND WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY 020 SUPPLY MANAGEMENT—ARMY 20,100 20,100 SUBTOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY 20,100 20,100 TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND 20,100 20,100 DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER DRUG ACTIVITIES 010 COUNTER-NARCOTICS SUPPORT 163,596 163,596 SUBTOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER DRUG ACTIVITIES 163,596 163,596 TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF 163,596 163,596 OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 010 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE 24,254 24,254 SUBTOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 24,254 24,254 TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 24,254 24,254 DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM OPERATION & MAINTENANCE 010 IN-HOUSE CARE 57,459 57,459 020 PRIVATE SECTOR CARE 287,487 287,487 030 CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT 2,800 2,800 SUBTOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE 347,746 347,746 TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 347,746 347,746 COUNTER ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) COUNTER ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) 010 IRAQ 745,000 645,000 Transfer to DSCA Security Cooperation [–100,000] 020 SYRIA 300,000 300,000 SUBTOTAL COUNTER ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) 1,045,000 945,000 TOTAL COUNTER ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) 1,045,000 945,000 TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 1,600,696 1,500,696 XLVI MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION Account State/Country and Installation Project Title FY 2020 Senate MILITARY CONSTRUCTION ARMY Alabama Army Redstone Arsenal Aircraft and Flight Equipment Building 38,000 38,000 Colorado Army Fort Carson Company Operations Facility 71,000 71,000 Georgia Army Fort Gordon Cyber Instructional Fac (Admin/Command) 107,000 67,000 Army Hunter Army Airfield Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 62,000 62,000 Hawaii Army Fort Shafter Command and Control Facility, Incr 5 60,000 60,000 Honduras Army Soto Cano AB Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 34,000 34,000 Japan Army Kadena Air Base Vehicle Maintenance Shop 0 15,000 Kentucky Army Fort Campbell General Purpose Maintenance Shop 51,000 51,000 Army Fort Campbell Automated Infantry Platoon Battle Course 7,100 7,100 Army Fort Campbell Easements 3,200 3,200 Massachusetts Army Soldier Systems Center Natick Human Engineering Lab 50,000 50,000 Michigan Army Detroit Arsenal Substation 24,000 24,000 New York Army Fort Drum Railhead 0 21,000 Army Fort Drum Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar 23,000 23,000 North Carolina Army Fort Bragg Dining Facility 12,500 12,500 Oklahoma Army Fort Sill Adv Individual Training Barracks Cplx, Ph2 73,000 73,000 Pennsylvania Army Carlisle Barracks General Instruction Building 98,000 98,000 South Carolina Army Fort Jackson Reception Complex, Ph2 54,000 54,000 Texas Army Corpus Christi Army Depot Powertrain Facility (Machine Shop) 86,000 86,000 Army Fort Hood Vehicle Bridge 0 18,500 Army Fort Hood Barracks 32,000 32,000 Virginia Army Fort Belvoir Secure Operations and Admin Facility 60,000 60,000 Army Joint Base Langley-Eustis Adv Individual Training Barracks Cplx, Ph4 55,000 55,000 Washington Army Joint Base Lewis-McChord Information Systems Facility 46,000 46,000 Worldwide Unspecified Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 70,600 70,600 Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Host Nation Support 31,000 31,000 Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 94,099 94,099 Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Worldwide Construction 211,000 0 SUBTOTAL ARMY 1,453,499 1,256,999 NAVY Arizona Navy MCAS Yuma Bachelor Enlisted Quarters—2+2 Replacement 0 99,600 Navy Yuma Hangar 95 Renovation & Addition 90,160 90,160 Australia Navy Darwin Aircraft Parking Apron 0 50,000 Bahrain Island Navy SW Asia Electrical System Upgrade 53,360 53,360 California Navy Camp Pendleton I MEF Consolidated Information Center 113,869 23,000 Navy Camp Pendleton 62 Area Mess Hall and Consolidated Warehouse 71,700 71,700 Navy China Lake Runway & Taxiway Extension 64,500 64,500 Navy Coronado Aircraft Paint Complex 0 79,000 Navy Coronado Aircraft Paint Complex 79,100 79,100 Navy Coronado Navy V–22 Hangar 86,830 86,830 Navy MCAS Miramar Child Development Center 0 37,400 Navy MCRD San Diego PMO Facility Replacement 0 9,900 Navy San Diego Pier 8 Replacement (Inc) 59,353 59,353 Navy Seal Beach Missile Magazines 0 28,000 Navy Seal Beach Ammunition Pier 95,310 95,310 Navy Travis AFB Alert Force Complex 64,000 64,000 Connecticut Navy New London SSN Berthing Pier 32 72,260 72,260 District of Columbia Navy Naval Observatory Master Time Clocks & Operations Fac (Inc) 75,600 75,600 Florida Navy Jacksonville Targeting & Surveillance Syst Prod Supp Fac 32,420 32,420 Navy MCSF Blount Island Police Station and EOC Facility Replacement 0 18,700 Guam Navy Joint Region Marianas Machine Gun Range (Inc) 91,287 91,287 Navy Joint Region Marianas Bachelor Enlisted Quarters H 164,100 20,000 Navy Joint Region Marianas EOD Compound Facilities 61,900 61,900 Hawaii Navy Kaneohe Bay Bachelor Enlisted Quarters 134,050 39,000 Navy West Loch Magazine Consolidation, Phase 1 53,790 53,790 Italy Navy Sigonella Communications Station 77,400 77,400 Japan Navy Iwakuni VTOL Pad—South 15,870 15,870 Navy Yokosuka Pier 5 (Berths 2 and 3) 174,692 110,000 North Carolina Navy Camp Lejeune 2nd Radio BN Complex, Phase 2 (Inc) 25,650 25,650 Navy Camp Lejeune ACV-AAV Maintenance Facility Upgrades 11,570 11,570 Navy Camp Lejeune 10th Marines Himars Complex 35,110 35,110 Navy Camp Lejeune II MEF Operations Center Replacement 122,200 122,200 Navy Camp Lejeune 2nd MARDIV/2nd MLG Ops Center Replacement 60,130 60,130 Navy MCAS Cherry Point Slocum Road Physical Security Compliance 0 52,300 Navy MCAS Cherry Point Aircraft Maintenance Hangar (Inc) 73,970 73,970 Navy MCAS Cherry Point F–35 Training and Simulator Facility 53,230 53,230 Navy MCAS Cherry Point ATC Tower & Airfield Operations 61,340 61,340 Navy MCAS Cherry Point Flightline Utility Modernization (Inc) 51,860 51,860 Navy New River CH–53K Cargo Loading Trainer 11,320 11,320 South Carolina Navy MCRD Parris Island Range Safety Improvements and Modernization Phase III, Chosin Range 0 37,200 Utah Navy Hill AFB D5 Missile Motor Receipt/Storage Fac (Inc) 50,520 50,520 Virginia Navy Portsmouth Dry Dock Flood Protection Improvements 48,930 48,930 Navy Quantico Wargaming Center 143,350 10,000 Navy Yorktown Nmc Ordnance Facilities Recapitalization, Phase 1 0 59,000 Washington Navy Bremerton Dry Dock 4 & Pier 3 Modernization 51,010 51,010 Navy Keyport Undersea Vehicle Maintenance Facility 25,050 25,050 Navy Kitsap Seawolf Service Pier Cost-to-Complete 0 48,000 Worldwide Unspecified Navy Unspecified Family Housing Mitigation and Oversight 0 59,600 Navy Unspecified Planning and Design 0 20,400 Navy Unspecified Planning and Design 0 8,000 Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 81,237 81,237 Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 167,715 167,715 SUBTOTAL NAVY 2,805,743 2,884,782 AIR FORCE Alaska Air Force Eielson AFB F–35 AME Storage Facility 8,600 8,600 Arkansas Air Force Little Rock AFB C–130H/J Fuselage Trainer Facility 47,000 47,000 Australia Air Force Tindal APR-RAAF Tindal/Bulk Storage Tanks 59,000 59,000 Air Force Tindal APR—RAAF Tindal/Earth Covered Magazine 11,600 11,600 California Air Force Travis AFB MMHS Allied Support 0 17,000 Air Force Travis AFB KC–46A Alter B181/B185/B187 Squad Ops/AMU 6,600 6,600 Air Force Travis AFB KC–46A Regional Maintenance Training Facility 19,500 19,500 Colorado Air Force Peterson AFB SOCNORTH Theater Operational Support Facility 0 54,000 Air Force Schriever AFB Consolidated Space Operations Facility 148,000 23,000 Cyprus Air Force RAF Akrotiri New Dormitory for 1 ERS 27,000 27,000 Guam Air Force Joint Region Marianas Munitions Storage Igloos III 65,000 65,000 Illinois Air Force Scott AFB Joint Operations & Mission Planning Center 100,000 90,000 Japan Air Force Kadena Air Base Munitions Storage 0 7,000 Air Force Misawa Air Base Fuel Infrastructure Resiliency 0 5,300 Air Force Yokota AB Fuel Receipt & Distribution Upgrade 12,400 12,400 Jordan Air Force Azraq Air Traffic Control Tower 24,000 24,000 Air Force Azraq Munitions Storage Area 42,000 42,000 Mariana Islands Air Force Tinian Fuel Tanks W/ Pipeline/Hydrant System 109,000 10,000 Air Force Tinian Airfield Development Phase 1 109,000 10,000 Air Force Tinian Parking Apron 98,000 98,000 Maryland Air Force Joint Base Andrews Presidential Aircraft Recap Complex Inc 3 86,000 86,000 Massachusetts Air Force Hanscom AFB MIT-Lincoln Lab (West Lab CSL/MIF) Inc 2 135,000 65,000 Missouri Air Force Whiteman AFB Consolidated Vehicle Ops and MX Facility 0 27,000 Montana Air Force Malmstrom AFB Weapons Storage and Maintenance Facility 235,000 16,000 Nevada Air Force Nellis AFB 365th ISR Group Facility 57,000 57,000 Air Force Nellis AFB F–35A Munitions Assembly Conveyor Facility 8,200 8,200 New Mexico Air Force Holloman AFB NC3 Support Wrm Storage/Shipping Facility 0 20,000 Air Force Kirtland AFB Combat Rescue Helicopter Simulator (CRH) ADAL 15,500 15,500 Air Force Kirtland AFB UH–1 Replacement Facility 22,400 22,400 North Dakota Air Force Minot AFB Helo/TRFOps/AMUFacility 5,500 5,500 Ohio Air Force Wright-Patterson AFB ADAL Intelligence Prod. Complex (NASIC) Inc 2 120,900 74,000 Texas Air Force Joint Base San Antonio BMT Recruit Dormitory 8 110,000 17,000 Air Force Joint Base San Antonio Aquatics Tank 69,000 69,000 Air Force Joint Base San Antonio T-XA DAL Ground Based Trng Sys (GBTS) Sim 9,300 9,300 Air Force Joint Base San Antonio T-XMX Trng Sys Centrailized Trng Fac 19,000 19,000 United Kingdom Air Force Royal Air Force Lakenheath F–35A PGM Facility 14,300 14,300 Utah Air Force Hill AFB GBSD Mission Integration Facility 108,000 18,000 Air Force Hill AFB Joint Advanced Tactical Missile Storage Fac 6,500 6,500 Washington Air Force Fairchild AFB Consolidated TFI Base Operations 31,000 31,000 Worldwide Unspecified Air Force Unspecified Conus Military Family Housing Civilian Personnel 0 31,200 Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Cost to Complete 0 190,000 Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design 0 40,000 Air Force Various Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 142,148 142,148 Air Force Various Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 79,682 79,682 Wyoming Air Force F. E. Warren AFB Consolidated Helo/TRF Ops/AMU and Alert Fac 18,100 18,100 SUBTOTAL AIR FORCE 2,179,230 1,718,830 DEFENSE-WIDE California Defense-Wide Beale AFB Hydrant Fuel System Replacement 33,700 33,700 Defense-Wide Camp Pendleton Ambul Care Center/Dental Clinic Replacement 17,700 17,700 Defense-Wide Mountain View—63 RSC Install Microgrid Controller, 750 Kw PV, and 750 Kwh Battery Storage 0 9,700 Defense-Wide NAWS China Lake Energy Storage System 0 8,950 Defense-Wide NSA Monterey Cogeneration Plant at B236 0 10,540 Conus Classified Defense-Wide Classified Location Battalion Complex, Ph 3 82,200 82,200 Florida Defense-Wide Eglin AFB SOF Combined Squadron Ops Facility 16,500 16,500 Defense-Wide Hurlburt Field SOF Maintenance Training Facility 18,950 18,950 Defense-Wide Hurlburt Field SOF AMU & Weapons Hangar 72,923 72,923 Defense-Wide Hurlburt Field SOF Combined Squadron Operations Facility 16,513 16,513 Defense-Wide Key West SOF Watercraft Maintenance Facility 16,000 16,000 Germany Defense-Wide Geilenkirchen AB Ambulatory Care Center/Dental Clinic 30,479 30,479 Defense-Wide Ramstein Landstuhl Elementary School 0 66,800 Guam Defense-Wide Joint Region Marianas Xray Wharf Refueling Facility 19,200 19,200 Defense-Wide NB Guam NSA Andersen Smart Grid and ICS Infrastructure 0 16,970 Hawaii Defense-Wide Joint Base Pearl Harbor‐hickam (JBPHH) Install 500kw Covered Parking PV System & Electric Vehicle Charging Stations B479 0 4,000 Defense-Wide Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam SOF Undersea Operational Training Facility 67,700 67,700 Japan Defense-Wide Yokosuka Kinnick High School Inc 2 130,386 10,000 Defense-Wide Yokota AB Pacific East District Superintendent's Office 20,106 20,106 Defense-Wide Yokota AB Bulk Storage Tanks PH1 116,305 21,000 Louisiana Defense-Wide JRB NAS New Orleans Distribution Switchgear 0 5,340 Maryland Defense-Wide Bethesda Naval Hospital MEDCEN Addition/Altertion Incr 3 96,900 96,900 Defense-Wide Fort Detrick Medical Research Acquisition Building 27,846 27,846 Defense-Wide Fort Meade NSAW Recapitalize Building #3 Inc 2 426,000 426,000 Defense-Wide NSA Bethesda Chiller 3‐9 Replacement 0 13,840 Defense-Wide South Potomac IH Water Project—CBIRF/IHEODTD/Housing 0 18,460 Mississippi Defense-Wide Columbus AFB Fuel Facilities Replacement 16,800 16,800 Missouri Defense-Wide Fort Leonard Wood Hospital Replacement Incr 2 50,000 50,000 Defense-Wide St Louis Next NGA West (N2W) Complex Phase 2 Inc. 2 218,800 153,000 New Mexico Defense-Wide White Sands Missile Range Install Microgrid, 700kw PV, 150 Kw Generator, and Batteries 0 5,800 North Carolina Defense-Wide Camp Lejeune SOF Marine Raider Regiment HQ 13,400 13,400 Defense-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Human Platform-Force Generation Facility 43,000 43,000 Defense-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Assessment and Selection Training Complex 12,103 12,103 Defense-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Operations Support Bldg 29,000 29,000 Oklahoma Defense-Wide Tulsa IAP Fuels Storage Complex 18,900 18,900 Rhode Island Defense-Wide Quonset State Airport Fuels Storage Complex Replacement 11,600 11,600 South Carolina Defense-Wide Joint Base Charleston Medical Consolidated Storage & Distrib Center 33,300 33,300 South Dakota Defense-Wide Ellsworth AFB Hydrant Fuel System Replacement 24,800 24,800 Texas Defense-Wide Camp Swift Install Microgrid, 650 Kw PV, & 500 Kw Generator 0 4,500 Defense-Wide Fort Hood Install a Central Energy Plant 0 16,500 Virginia Defense-Wide Dam Neck SOF Demolition Training Compound Expansion 12,770 12,770 Defense-Wide Def Distribution Depot Richmond Operations Center Phase 2 98,800 98,800 Defense-Wide Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek—Story SOF NSWG–10 Operations Support Facility 32,600 32,600 Defense-Wide Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek—Story SOF NSWG2 JSOTF Ops Training Facility 13,004 13,004 Defense-Wide NRO Headquarters Irrigation System Upgrade 0 66 Defense-Wide Pentagon Backup Generator 8,670 8,670 Defense-Wide Pentagon Control Tower & Fire Day Station 20,132 20,132 Washington Defense-Wide Joint Base Lewis-McChord SOF 22 STS Operations Facility 47,700 47,700 Defense-Wide Naval Base Kitsap Keyport Main Substation Replacement 0 23,670 Wisconsin Defense-Wide Gen Mitchell IAP POL Facilities Replacement 25,900 25,900 Worldwide Classified Defense-Wide Classified Location Mission Support Compound 52,000 52,000 Worldwide Unspecified Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Defense Community Infrastructure Program 0 100,000 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 4,950 4,950 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 8,000 8,000 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 29,679 29,679 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 10,000 10,000 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 35,472 35,472 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 31,464 31,464 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Energy Resilience and Conserv. Invest. Prog. 150,000 150,000 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Contingency Construction 10,000 10,000 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 3,000 3,000 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 14,400 14,400 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations ERCIP Design 10,000 10,000 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 3,228 3,228 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 15,000 15,000 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Exercise Related Minor Construction 11,770 11,770 Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 4,890 4,890 Defense-Wide Various Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 52,532 52,532 Defense-Wide Various Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 27,000 27,000 Defense-Wide Various Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 16,736 16,736 Defense-Wide Various Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 10,000 10,000 Defense-Wide Various Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 63,382 63,382 SUBTOTAL DEFENSE-WIDE 2,504,190 2,527,835 ARMY NATIONAL GUARD Alabama Army National Guard Anniston Enlisted Transient Training Barracks 0 34,000 Army National Guard Foley National Guard Readiness Center 12,000 12,000 California Army National Guard Camp Roberts Automated Multipurpose Machine Gun Range 12,000 12,000 Idaho Army National Guard Orchard Training Area Railroad Tracks 29,000 29,000 Maryland Army National Guard Havre de Grace Combined Support Maintenance Shop 12,000 12,000 Massachusetts Army National Guard Camp Edwards Automated Multipurpose Machine Gun Range 9,700 9,700 Minnesota Army National Guard New Ulm National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop 11,200 11,200 Mississippi Army National Guard Camp Shelby Automated Multipurpose Machine Gun Range 8,100 8,100 Missouri Army National Guard Springfield National Guard Readiness Center 12,000 12,000 Nebraska Army National Guard Bellevue National Guard Readiness Center 29,000 29,000 New Hampshire Army National Guard Concord National Guard Readiness Center 5,950 5,950 New York Army National Guard Jamaica Armory National Guard Readiness Center 0 20,000 Pennsylvania Army National Guard Moon Township Combined Support Maintenance Shop 23,000 23,000 Vermont Army National Guard Camp Ethan Allen General Instruction Building (Mountain Warfare School) 0 30,000 Washington Army National Guard Richland National Guard Readiness Center 11,400 11,400 Worldwide Unspecified Army National Guard Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 15,000 15,000 Army National Guard Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 20,469 20,469 SUBTOTAL ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 210,819 294,819 AIR NATIONAL GUARD California Air National Guard Moffett Air National Guard Base (NASA) Fuels/Corrosion Control Hangar and Shops 0 57,000 Georgia Air National Guard Savannah/Hilton Head IAP Consolidated Joint Air Dominance Hangar/Shops 24,000 24,000 Missouri Air National Guard Rosecrans Memorial Airport C–130 Flight Simulator Facility 9,500 9,500 Puerto Rico Air National Guard Luis Munoz-Marin IAP Communications Facility 12,500 12,500 Air National Guard Luis Munoz-Marin IAP Maintenance Hangar 37,500 37,500 Wisconsin Air National Guard Truax Field F–35 Simulator Facility 14,000 14,000 Air National Guard Truax Field Fighter Alert Shelters 20,000 20,000 Worldwide Unspecified Air National Guard Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 31,471 31,471 Air National Guard Various Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 17,000 17,000 SUBTOTAL AIR NATIONAL GUARD 165,971 222,971 ARMY RESERVE Delaware Army Reserve Dover AFB Army Reserve Center/BMA 21,000 21,000 Wisconsin Army Reserve Fort McCoy Transient Training Barracks 25,000 25,000 Worldwide Unspecified Army Reserve Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 8,928 8,928 Army Reserve Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 6,000 6,000 SUBTOTAL ARMY RESERVE 60,928 60,928 NAVY RESERVE Louisiana Navy Reserve New Orleans Entry Control Facility Upgrades 25,260 25,260 Worldwide Unspecified Navy Reserve Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 24,915 24,915 Navy Reserve Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 4,780 4,780 SUBTOTAL NAVY RESERVE 54,955 54,955 AIR FORCE RESERVE Georgia Air Force Reserve Robins AFB Consolidated Misssion Complex Phase 3 43,000 43,000 Minnesota Air Force Reserve Minneapolis-St Paul IAP Aerial Port Facility 0 9,800 Worldwide Unspecified Air Force Reserve Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 4,604 4,604 Air Force Reserve Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction 12,146 12,146 SUBTOTAL AIR FORCE RESERVE 59,750 69,550 NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM Worldwide Unspecified NATO Security Investment Program NATO Security Investment Program NATO Security Investment Program 144,040 144,040 SUBTOTAL NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM 144,040 144,040 TOTAL MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 9,639,125 9,235,709 FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION, ARMY Germany Construction, Army Baumholder Family Housing Improvements 29,983 29,983 Korea Construction, Army Camp Humphreys Family Housing New Construction Incr 4 83,167 83,167 Pennsylvania Construction, Army Tobyhanna Army Depot Family Housing Replacement Construction 19,000 19,000 Worldwide Unspecified Construction, Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Family Housing P & D 9,222 9,222 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION, ARMY 141,372 141,372 O&M, ARMY Worldwide Unspecified O&M, Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Management 38,898 38,898 O&M, Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Services 10,156 10,156 O&M, Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Furnishings 24,027 24,027 O&M, Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Miscellaneous 484 484 O&M, Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Maintenance 81,065 81,065 O&M, Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Utilities 55,712 55,712 O&M, Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Leasing 128,938 128,938 O&M, Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Housing Privitization Support 18,627 83,627 SUBTOTAL O&M, ARMY 357,907 422,907 CONSTRUCTION, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS Worldwide Unspecified Construction, Navy and Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations USMC DPRI/GUAM PLANNING AND DESIGN 2,000 2,000 Construction, Navy and Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations Construction Improvements 41,798 41,798 Construction, Navy and Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning & Design 3,863 3,863 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS 47,661 47,661 O&M, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS Worldwide Unspecified O&M, Navy and Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations Utilities 63,229 63,229 O&M, Navy and Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations Furnishings 19,009 19,009 O&M, Navy and Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations Management 50,122 50,122 O&M, Navy and Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations Miscellaneous 151 151 O&M, Navy and Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations Services 16,647 16,647 O&M, Navy and Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations Leasing 64,126 64,126 O&M, Navy and Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations Maintenance 82,611 82,611 O&M, Navy and Marine Corps Unspecified Worldwide Locations Housing Privatization Support 21,975 102,975 SUBTOTAL O&M, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS 317,870 398,870 CONSTRUCTION, AIR FORCE Germany Construction, Air Force Spangdahlem AB Construct Deficit Military Family Housing 53,584 53,584 Worldwide Unspecified Construction, Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations Construction Improvements 46,638 46,638 Construction, Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning & Design 3,409 3,409 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION, AIR FORCE 103,631 103,631 O&M, AIR FORCE Worldwide Unspecified O&M, Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations Housing Privatization 22,593 87,593 O&M, Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations Utilities 42,732 42,732 O&M, Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations Management 56,022 56,022 O&M, Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations Services 7,770 7,770 O&M, Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations Furnishings 30,283 30,283 O&M, Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations Miscellaneous 2,144 2,144 O&M, Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations Leasing 15,768 15,768 O&M, Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations Maintenance 117,704 117,704 SUBTOTAL O&M, AIR FORCE 295,016 360,016 O&M, DEFENSE-WIDE Worldwide Unspecified O&M, Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Utilities 4,100 4,100 O&M, Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Furnishings 82 82 O&M, Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Utilities 13 13 O&M, Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Leasing 12,906 12,906 O&M, Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Maintenance 32 32 O&M, Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Furnishings 645 645 O&M, Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations Leasing 39,222 39,222 SUBTOTAL O&M, DEFENSE-WIDE 57,000 57,000 IMPROVEMENT FUND Worldwide Unspecified Improvement Fund Unspecified Worldwide Locations Administrative Expenses—FHIF 3,045 3,045 SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 3,045 3,045 UNACCMP HSG IMPROVEMENT FUND Worldwide Unspecified Unaccmp HSG Improvement Fund Unspecified Worldwide Locations Administrative Expenses—UHIF 500 500 SUBTOTAL UNACCMP HSG IMPROVEMENT FUND 500 500 TOTAL FAMILY HOUSING 1,324,002 1,535,002 DEFENSE BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ARMY BRAC Worldwide Unspecified Army BRAC Base Realignment & Closure, Army Base Realignment and Closure 66,111 66,111 SUBTOTAL ARMY BRAC 66,111 66,111 NAVY BRAC Worldwide Unspecified Navy BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Locations Base Realignment & Closure 158,349 158,349 SUBTOTAL NAVY BRAC 158,349 158,349 AIR FORCE BRAC Worldwide Unspecified Air Force BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Locations DoD BRAC Activities—Air Force 54,066 54,066 SUBTOTAL AIR FORCE BRAC 54,066 54,066 TOTAL DEFENSE BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE 278,526 278,526 TOTAL MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, FAMILY HOUSING, AND BRAC 11,241,653 11,049,237 4602. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS SEC. 4602. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS Account State or Country and Installation Project Title FY 2020 Senate MILITARY CONSTRUCTION ARMY Guantanamo Bay, Cuba Army Guantanamo Bay Naval Station OCO: Communications Facility 22,000 22,000 Army Guantanamo Bay Naval Station OCO: High Value Detention Facility 88,500 0 Army Guantanamo Bay Naval Station OCO: Detention Legal Office and Comms Ctr 11,800 11,800 Worldwide Unspecified Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations EDI: Bulk Fuel Storage 36,000 36,000 Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations EDI: Information Systems Facility 6,200 6,200 Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations EDI/OCO Planning and Design 19,498 19,498 Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations EDI: Minor Construction 5,220 5,220 Army Unspecified Worldwide Locations Unspecified Worldwide Construction 9,200,000 0 SUBTOTAL ARMY 9,389,218 100,718 NAVY North Carolina Navy Camp Lejeune 1/8 BN HQ Replacement 0 20,635 Navy Camp Lejeune 22nd, 24th and 26th MEU Headquarters Replacement 0 31,110 Navy Camp Lejeune 2D Tank BN/CO HQ and Armory Replacement 0 30,154 Navy Camp Lejeune 2D TSB HQ Replacement 0 17,413 Navy Camp Lejeune Bachelor Enlisted Quarters Replacement 0 62,104 Navy Camp Lejeune C–12W Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Replacement 0 36,295 Navy Camp Lejeune CLB Headquarters Facilities Replacement 0 24,788 Navy Camp Lejeune Courthouse Bay Fire Station Replacement 0 21,336 Navy Camp Lejeune Environmental Management Division Replacement 0 11,658 Navy Camp Lejeune Fire Station Replacement, Hadnot Point 0 21,931 Navy Camp Lejeune Hadnot Point Mess Hall Replacement 0 66,023 Navy Camp Lejeune II MEF Simulation/Training Center Replacement 0 74,487 Navy Camp Lejeune LOGCOM CSP Warehouse Replacement 0 35,874 Navy Camp Lejeune LSSS Facility Replacement 0 26,815 Navy Camp Lejeune MCAB HQ Replacement 0 30,109 Navy Camp Lejeune MCCSSS Log Ops School 0 179,617 Navy Camp Lejeune PMO/H&HS & MWHS–2 Headquarters Replacement 0 65,845 Navy Camp Lejeune Replace NCIS Facilities 0 22,594 Navy Camp Lejeune Replace Regimental Headquarters 2DMARDIV 0 64,155 Navy Camp Lejeune Replace WTBN Headquarters 0 18,644 Navy MCAS Cherry Point BT–11 Range Operations Center Replacement 0 14,251 Navy MCAS Cherry Point Motor Transportation/Communication Shop Replacement 0 32,785 Navy MCAS Cherry Point Station Academic Facility/Auditorium Replacement 0 17,525 Spain Navy Rota EDI: Joint Mobility Center 46,840 46,840 Navy Rota EDI: In-Transit Munitions Facility 9,960 9,960 Navy Rota EDI: Small Craft Berthing Facility 12,770 12,770 Worldwide Unspecified Navy Unspecified Planning & Design 0 50,000 Navy Unspecified Worldwide Locations Planning and Design 25,000 25,000 SUBTOTAL NAVY 94,570 1,070,718 AIR FORCE Florida Air Force Tyndall AFB 53 WEG Hangar 0 96,000 Air Force Tyndall AFB 53 WEG HQ Facility 0 47,000 Air Force Tyndall AFB 53 WEG Subscale Drone Facility 0 53,000 Air Force Tyndall AFB ABM SIM 0 12,900 Air Force Tyndall AFB Aerospace & Operational Physiology Facility 0 10,400 Air Force Tyndall AFB AFCEC RDT&E Facilities and Gate 0 195,000 Air Force Tyndall AFB Aircraft Washrack 0 10,600 Air Force Tyndall AFB Civil Engineer Contracting USACE Complex 0 130,000 Air Force Tyndall AFB Crash Fire Rescue 0 17,200 Air Force Tyndall AFB Deployment Center / Flight Line Dining / AAFES 0 31,000 Air Force Tyndall AFB Emergency Management, EOC, Alt CP 0 14,400 Air Force Tyndall AFB Fire Station #2 0 11,000 Air Force Tyndall AFB Fire Station Silver Flag #4 0 5,900 Air Force Tyndall AFB FW AC Maintenance Fuel Cell (Barn) 0 28,000 Air Force Tyndall AFB Logistics Readiness Squadron Complex 0 102,000 Air Force Tyndall AFB LRS Aircraft Parts & Deployable Spares Storage Facilities 0 29,000 Air Force Tyndall AFB New Lodge Facilities 0 176,000 Air Force Tyndall AFB Operations Group/Maintenance Group HQ 0 18,500 Air Force Tyndall AFB OSS / RAPCON Facility 0 51,000 Air Force Tyndall AFB Relocate F–22 Formal Training Unit 0 150,000 Air Force Tyndall AFB SFS Mobility Storage Facility 0 2,800 Air Force Tyndall AFB Silver Flag Facilities 0 35,000 Air Force Tyndall AFB Special Purpose Vehicle Maintenance 0 14,000 Air Force Tyndall AFB Tyndall AFB Gate Complexes 0 38,000 Iceland Air Force Keflavik EDI-Expand Parking Apron 32,000 32,000 Air Force Keflavik EDI-Beddown Site Prep 7,000 7,000 Air Force Keflavik EDI-Airfield Upgrades—Dangerous Cargo Pad 18,000 18,000 Spain Air Force Moron EDI-Hot Cargo Pad 8,500 8,500 Worldwide Unspecified Air Force Unspecified Planning & Design 0 247,000 Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations EDI-Hot Cargo Pad 29,000 29,000 Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations EDI-MUNITIONS STORAGE AREA 39,000 39,000 Air Force Unspecified Worldwide Locations EDI-ECAOS DABS/FEV EMEDS Storage 107,000 107,000 Air Force Various Worldwide Locations EDI-P&D 61,438 61,438 Air Force Various Worldwide Locations EDI-UMMC 12,800 12,800 SUBTOTAL AIR FORCE 314,738 1,840,438 DEFENSE-WIDE Germany Defense-Wide Gemersheim EDI: Logistics Distribution Center Annex 46,000 46,000 North Carolina Defense-Wide Camp Lejeune Ambulatory Care Center (Camp Geiger) 0 17,821 Defense-Wide Camp Lejeune Ambulatory Care Center (Camp Johnson) 0 27,492 Defense-Wide Camp Lejeune Replace MARSOC ITC Team Facility 0 30,000 Worldwide Unspecified Defense-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Locations 2808 Replenishment Fund 0 3,600,000 SUBTOTAL DEFENSE-WIDE 46,000 3,721,313 ARMY NATIONAL GUARD Florida Army National Guard Panama City National Guard Readiness Center 0 25,000 North Carolina Army National Guard MTA Fort Fisher Administrative Building, General Purpose 0 25,000 SUBTOTAL ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 50,000 TOTAL MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 9,844,526 6,783,187 TOTAL MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, FAMILY HOUSING, AND BRAC 9,844,526 6,783,187 XLVII DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS Program FY 2020 Senate Discretionary Summary by Appropriation Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Nuclear energy 137,808 137,808 Atomic Energy Defense Activities National nuclear security administration: Federal Salaries and Expenses 434,699 422,999 Weapons activities 12,408,603 12,478,403 Defense nuclear nonproliferation 1,993,302 1,964,202 Naval reactors 1,648,396 1,648,396 Total, National nuclear security administration 16,485,000 16,514,000 Environmental and other defense activities: Defense environmental cleanup 5,506,501 5,506,501 Other defense activities 1,035,339 1,032,339 Defense nuclear waste disposal (90M in 270 Energy) 26,000 0 Total, Environmental & other defense activities 6,567,840 6,538,840 Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities 23,052,840 23,052,840 Total, Discretionary Funding 23,190,648 23,190,648 Nuclear Energy Idaho sitewide safeguards and security 137,808 137,808 Total, Nuclear Energy 137,808 137,808 Federal Salaries and Expenses Program direction 434,699 422,999 Alignment with FTEs authorized [–11,700] Weapons Activities Directed stockpile work Life extension programs and major alterations B61 Life extension program 792,611 792,611 W76 Life extension program 0 0 W76–2 Modification program 10,000 10,000 W88 Alteration program 304,186 304,186 W80–4 Life extension program 898,551 898,551 IW1 0 0 W87–1 Modification Program (formerly IW1) 112,011 112,011 Total, Life extension programs and major alterations 2,117,359 2,117,359 Stockpile systems B61 Stockpile systems 71,232 71,232 W76 Stockpile systems 89,804 89,804 W78 Stockpile systems 81,299 81,299 W80 Stockpile systems 85,811 85,811 B83 Stockpile systems 51,543 51,543 W87 Stockpile systems 98,262 98,262 W88 Stockpile systems 157,815 157,815 Total, Stockpile systems 635,766 635,766 Weapons dismantlement and disposition Operations and maintenance 47,500 47,500 Stockpile services Production support 543,964 543,964 Research and development support 39,339 40,339 UFR list—technology maturation [1,000] R&D certification and safety 236,235 246,235 UFR list—technology maturation [10,000] Management, technology, and production 305,000 305,000 Total, Stockpile services 1,124,538 1,135,538 Strategic materials Uranium sustainment 94,146 94,146 Plutonium sustainment 0 0 Plutonium sustainment: Plutonium sustainment 691,284 691,284 Plutonium pit production project 21,156 21,156 Total, Plutonium sustainment: 712,440 712,440 Tritium sustainment 269,000 269,000 Domestic uranium enrichment 140,000 140,000 Lithium sustainment 28,800 28,800 Strategic materials sustainment 256,808 256,808 Total, Strategic materials 1,501,194 1,501,194 Total, Directed stockpile work 5,426,357 5,437,357 Research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) Science Advanced certification 57,710 57,710 Primary assessment technologies 95,169 95,169 Dynamic materials properties 133,800 133,800 Advanced radiography 32,544 32,544 Secondary assessment technologies 77,553 77,553 Academic alliances and partnerships 44,625 44,625 Enhanced Capabilities for Subcritical Experiments 145,160 145,160 Total, Science 586,561 586,561 Engineering Enhanced surety 46,500 54,500 UFR list—technology maturation [8,000] Weapon systems engineering assessment technology 0 0 Delivery environments (formerly Weapon systems engineering assessment technology) 35,945 35,945 Nuclear survivability 53,932 53,932 Enhanced surveillance 57,747 57,747 Stockpile Responsiveness 39,830 80,630 Program expansion [40,800] Total, Engineering 233,954 282,754 Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield Ignition and other stockpile programs 55,649 55,649 Ignition 0 0 Support of other stockpile programs 0 0 Diagnostics, cryogenics and experimental support 66,128 66,128 Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion 8,571 8,571 Joint program in high energy density laboratory plasmas 12,000 12,000 Facility operations and target production 338,247 338,247 Total, Inertial confinement fusion and high yield 480,595 480,595 Advanced simulation and computing Advanced simulation and computing 789,849 789,849 Construction: 18–D–670, Exascale Class Computer Cooling Equipment, LANL 0 0 18–D–620, Exascale Computing Facility Modernization Project, LLNL 50,000 50,000 Total, Construction 50,000 50,000 Total, Advanced simulation and computing 839,849 839,849 Advanced manufacturing development Additive manufacturing 18,500 18,500 Component manufacturing development 48,410 58,410 UFR list—technology maturation [10,000] Process technology development 69,998 69,998 Total, Advanced manufacturing development 136,908 146,908 Total, RDT&E 2,277,867 2,336,667 Infrastructure and operations Operating Operations of facilities Operations of facilities 905,000 905,000 Safety and environmental operations 119,000 119,000 Maintenance and repair of facilities 456,000 456,000 Recapitalization Infrastructure and safety 447,657 447,657 Capability based investments 135,341 135,341 Total, Recapitalization 582,998 582,998 Total, Operating 2,062,998 2,062,998 Construction: 19–D–670, 138kV Power Transmission System Replacement, NNSS 6,000 6,000 18–D–660, Fire Station, Y–12 0 0 18–D–650, Tritium Production Capability, SRS 27,000 27,000 18–D–680, Materials staging facility, PX 0 0 18–D–690, Lithium production capability, Y–12 0 0 18–D–690, Lithium processing facility, Y–12 (formerly Lithium production capability) 32,000 32,000 17–D–640, U1a Complex Enhancements Project, NNSS 35,000 35,000 17–D–630, Expand Electrical Distribution System, LLNL 0 0 16–D–515, Albuquerque complex project 0 0 15–D–613, Emergency Operations Center, Y–12 0 0 15–D–612, Emergency Operations Center, LLNL 5,000 5,000 15–D–611, Emergency Operations Center, SNL 4,000 4,000 15–D–301 HE Science & Engineering Facility, PX 123,000 123,000 07–D–220, Radioactive liquid waste treatment facility upgrade project, LANL 0 0 07–D–220-04, Transuranic liquid waste facility, LANL 0 0 06–D–141, Uranium processing facility Y–12, Oak Ridge, TN 745,000 745,000 Chemistry and metallurgy research replacement (CMRR) 04–D–125, Chemistry and metallurgy research replacement project, LANL 168,444 168,444 04–D–125–04, RLUOB equipment installation 0 0 04–D–125–05, PF –4 equipment installation 0 0 Total, Chemistry and metallurgy research replacement (CMRR) 168,444 168,444 Total, Construction 1,145,444 1,145,444 Total, Infrastructure and operations 3,208,442 3,208,442 Secure transportation asset Operations and equipment 209,502 209,502 Program direction 107,660 107,660 Total, Secure transportation asset 317,162 317,162 Defense nuclear security 0 Operations and maintenance 778,213 778,213 Security improvements program 0 0 Construction: 0 17–D–710, West end protected area reduction project, Y–12 0 0 Total, Defense nuclear security 778,213 778,213 Information technology and cybersecurity 309,362 309,362 Legacy contractor pensions 91,200 91,200 Subtotal, Weapons activities 12,408,603 12,478,403 Adjustments Use of prior year balances 0 0 Total, Adjustments 0 0 Total, Weapons Activities 12,408,603 12,478,403 Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs Material management and minimization HEU reactor conversion 114,000 114,000 Nuclear material removal 32,925 32,925 Material disposition 186,608 186,608 Laboratory and partnership support 0 0 Total, Material management & minimization 333,533 333,533 Global material security International nuclear security 48,839 48,839 Domestic radiological security 90,513 90,513 International radiological security 60,827 60,827 Nuclear smuggling detection and deterrence 142,171 142,171 Total, Global material security 342,350 342,350 Nonproliferation and arms control 137,267 137,267 Defense nuclear nonproliferation R&D Proliferation detection 304,040 284,540 Nonproliferation Stewardship program strategic plan [–19,500] Nuclear detonation detection 191,317 191,317 Nonproliferation fuels development 0 0 Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D 495,357 475,857 Nonproliferation construction U. S. Construction: 18–D–150 Surplus Plutonium Disposition Project 79,000 79,000 99–D–143, Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility, SRS 220,000 220,000 Total, U. S. Construction: 299,000 299,000 Total, Nonproliferation construction 299,000 299,000 Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs 1,607,507 1,588,007 Legacy contractor pensions 13,700 13,700 Nuclear counterterrorism and incident response program Nuclear counterterrorism and incident response 0 0 Emergency Operations 35,545 25,945 Non-defense function realignment [–9,600] Counterterrorism and Counterproliferation 336,550 336,550 Total, Nuclear counterterrorism and incident response program 372,095 362,495 Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 1,993,302 1,964,202 Adjustments Use of prior year balances 0 0 Total, Adjustments 0 0 Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 1,993,302 1,964,202 Rescission Rescission of prior year balances 0 0 Rescission of prior year balances (Gen. Prov.) 0 0 Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 1,993,302 1,964,202 Naval Reactors Naval reactors development 531,205 531,205 Columbia-Class reactor systems development 75,500 75,500 S8G Prototype refueling 155,000 155,000 Naval reactors operations and infrastructure 553,591 553,591 Program direction 50,500 50,500 Construction: 20-D–931, KL Fuel development laboratory 23,700 23,700 19–D–930, KS Overhead Piping 20,900 20,900 17–D–911, BL Fire System Upgrade 0 0 15–D–904, NRF Overpack Storage Expansion 3 0 0 15–D–903, KL Fire System Upgrade 0 0 14–D–901, Spent fuel handling recapitalization project, NRF 238,000 238,000 Total, Construction 282,600 282,600 Transfer to NE—Advanced Test Reactor (non-add) ( 0) ( 0) Total, Naval Reactors 1,648,396 1,648,396 Defense Environmental Cleanup Closure sites: Closure sites administration 4,987 4,987 Richland: River corridor and other cleanup operations: River corridor and other cleanup operations 139,750 139,750 Central plateau remediation: Central plateau remediation 472,949 472,949 Total, Central plateau remediation 472,949 472,949 Richland community and regulatory support 5,121 5,121 Construction: 18–D–404 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage 11,000 11,000 Total, Construction 11,000 11,000 Total, Richland 628,820 628,820 Office of River Protection: Waste Treatment Immobilization Plant Commissioning 15,000 15,000 Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition 677,460 677,460 Construction: 18–D–16 Waste treatment and immobilization plant -LBL/Direct feed LAW 640,000 640,000 15–D–409 Low activity waste pretreatment system, ORP 0 0 01–D–16 D, High-level waste facility 30,000 30,000 01–D–16 E, Pretreatment Facility 20,000 20,000 Total, Construction 690,000 690,000 ORP Low-level waste offsite disposal 10,000 10,000 Total, Office of River protection 1,392,460 1,392,460 Idaho National Laboratory: Idaho cleanup and waste disposition 331,354 331,354 ID Excess facilities R&D 0 0 Idaho community and regulatory support 3,500 3,500 Total, Idaho National Laboratory 334,854 334,854 NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 1,727 1,727 LLNL Excess facilities R&D 128,000 128,000 Nuclear facility D & D Separations Process Research Unit 15,300 15,300 Nevada 60,737 60,737 Sandia National Laboratories 2,652 2,652 Los Alamos National Laboratory 195,462 195,462 Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites 403,878 403,878 Oak Ridge Reservation: OR Nuclear facility D & D 93,693 93,693 OR Excess facilities R&D 0 0 U233 Disposition Program 45,000 45,000 OR cleanup and waste disposition OR cleanup and waste disposition 82,000 82,000 Subtotal, OR cleanup and waste disposition 82,000 82,000 Construction: 17–D–401 On-site waste disposal facility 15,269 15,269 14–D–403 Outfall 200 Mercury Treatment Facility 49,000 49,000 Total, Construction 64,269 64,269 Total, OR cleanup and waste disposition 146,269 146,269 OR community & regulatory support 4,819 4,819 OR technology development and deployment 3,000 3,000 Total, Oak Ridge Reservation 292,781 292,781 Savannah River Sites: Savannah River risk management operations: Savannah River risk management operations 490,613 490,613 Construction: 18–D–402, Emergency Operations Center Replacement, SR 6,792 6,792 Total, Savannah River risk management operations 497,405 497,405 SR community and regulatory support 4,749 4,749 Radioactive liquid tank waste: Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition 797,706 797,706 Construction: 20-D–402 Advanced Manufacturing Collaborative Facility (AMC) 50,000 50,000 20-D–401 Saltstone Disposal Unit #10, 11, 12 500 500 19–D–701 SR Security system replacement 0 0 18–D–402,Saltstone disposal unit #8/9 51,750 51,750 17–D–402—Saltstone Disposal Unit #7 40,034 40,034 05–D–405 Salt waste processing facility, SRS 20,988 20,988 Total, Construction 163,272 163,272 Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste 960,978 960,978 Total, Savannah River Site 1,463,132 1,463,132 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Waste Isolation Pilot Plant 299,088 299,088 Construction: 15–D–411 Safety significant confinement ventilation system, WIPP 58,054 58,054 15–D–412 Exhaust shaft, WIPP 34,500 34,500 Total, Construction 92,554 92,554 Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant 391,642 391,642 Program direction 278,908 278,908 Program support 12,979 12,979 Safeguards and Security 317,622 317,622 Technology development 0 0 Use of prior year balances 0 0 Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup 5,522,063 5,522,063 Rescission: Rescission of prior year balances –15,562 –15,562 Rescission of prior year balances (Gen. Prov.) 0 0 Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup 5,506,501 5,506,501 Other Defense Activities Environment, health, safety and security Environment, health, safety and security 139,628 139,628 Program direction 72,881 72,881 Total, Environment, Health, safety and security 212,509 212,509 Independent enterprise assessments Independent enterprise assessments 24,068 24,068 Program direction 57,211 54,211 Non-defense function realignment [–3,000] Total, Independent enterprise assessments 81,279 78,279 Specialized security activities 254,578 254,578 Office of Legacy Management Legacy management 283,767 283,767 Program direction 19,262 19,262 Total, Office of Legacy Management 303,029 303,029 Defense related administrative support Chief financial officer 54,538 54,538 Chief information officer 124,554 124,554 Total, Defense related administrative support 179,092 179,092 Office of hearings and appeals 4,852 4,852 Subtotal, Other defense activities 1,035,339 1,032,339 Use of prior year balances (HA) 0 0 Total, Other Defense Activities 1,035,339 1,032,339 Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal Yucca mountain and interim storage 26,000 0 Total, Defense Nuclear Waste 26,000 0 June 11, 2019 Read twice and placed on the calendar

Summary: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 This bill authorizes FY2020 appropriations and sets forth policies for Department of Defense (DOD) programs and activities, including military personnel strengths. It does not provide budget authority, which is provided in subsequent appropriations legislation. The bill authorizes appropriations to DOD for Procurement; Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation; Operation and Maintenance; Working Capital Funds; Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction; Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities; the Defense Inspector General; the Defense Health Program; the Armed Forces Retirement Home; Overseas Contingency Operations; and Military Construction. The bill authorizes the FY2020 personnel strengths for active duty and reserve forces and sets forth policies regarding military personnel; acquisition policy and management; international programs; National Guard and Reserve Forces facilities; compensation and other personnel benefits; health care; DOD organization and management; civilian personnel matters; matters relating to foreign nations; and strategic programs, cyber, and intelligence matters. The bill authorizes appropriations for intelligence activities, base realignment and closure activities, and maritime matters. The bill also authorizes appropriations and sets forth policies for Department of Energy national security programs, including the National Nuclear Security Administration. The bill sets forth policies for North Korea nuclear sanctions, perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), military housing privatization, paid family leave for federal personnel, limiting the use of criminal history in federal hiring and contracting, sanctions with respect to foreign traffickers of illicit synthetic opioids, and a Cable Security Fleet to meet national security requirements. For more detailed information, see Congressional Research Service Report R46144, FY2020 National Defense Authorization Act: P.L. 116-92 (H.R. 2500, S. 1790); Congressional Research Service Report IF10515, Defense Primer: The NDAA Process; and Congressional Research Service Report IF10516, Defense Primer: Navigating the NDAA.