No Unconstitutional Strike against North Korea Act

To prohibit the introduction of the Armed Forces into hostilities in North Korea without a declaration of war or explicit statutory authorization, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the No Unconstitutional Strike against North Korea Act 2. Findings Congress finds the following: (1) The President is currently prohibited from initiating a war or launching a first strike without congressional approval under the Constitution and Federal law. (2) The Constitution, in article I, section 8, grants Congress the sole power to declare war. (3) George Washington wrote that The constitution vests the power of declaring war in Congress; therefore no offensive expedition of importance can be undertaken until after they shall have deliberated upon the subject and authorized such a measure (4) Alexander Hamilton wrote that The Congress shall have the power to declare war (5) James Madison wrote that The power to declare war, including the power of judging the causes of war, is fully and exclusively vested in the legislature … the executive has no right, in any case, to decide the question, whether there is or is not cause for declaring war Helvidius (6) Section 2(c) of the War Powers Resolution ( Public Law 93–148 50 U.S.C. 1541 the constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces (7) The American people, America’s allies in Asia, and the entire world have been deeply troubled by escalating tensions on the Korean peninsula. (8) Recent polling demonstrates that more than two-thirds of the American people believe that the United States should attack North Korea only if North Korea attacks first. (9) The United States has approximately 28,500 servicemembers stationed in South Korea, who would be placed in grave danger if an active military conflict were to erupt. (10) On August 14, 2017, Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Marine Corps General Joseph Dunford stated that the United States military’s priority is to support our government’s efforts to achieve the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula through diplomatic and economic pressure (11) On August 10, 2017, Defense Secretary James Mattis stated that armed conflict with North Korea would be catastrophic 3. Sense of Congress in support of a diplomatic resolution to growing tensions with North Korea It is the sense of Congress that— (1) a conflict on the Korean peninsula would have catastrophic consequences for— (A) the American people; (B) members of the United States Armed Forces stationed in the region; (C) United States interests; (D) United States allies South Korea and Japan; (E) the long-suffering people of North Korea; and (F) global peace and security more broadly; (2) actions and statements that increase tensions and could lead to miscalculation should be avoided; and (3) the President, in coordination with United States allies, should explore and pursue every feasible opportunity to— (A) engage in talks with North Korea on concrete steps to reduce tensions and improve communication; (B) initiate negotiations designed to achieve a diplomatic agreement to halt and eventually reverse North Korea’s nuclear and missile pursuits; and (C) move toward denuclearization and a permanent peace in the Korean peninsula. 4. Prohibition on unconstitutional military strikes against North Korea (a) In general None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense or to any other Federal department or agency may be used to launch a military strike against North Korea or otherwise introduce the Armed Forces into hostilities in North Korea before the earlier of— (1) the date on which Congress declares war on North Korea; or (2) the date of the enactment of an authorization described in subsection (b). (b) Authorization of military strikes An authorization described in this subsection is an authorization that meets the requirements of the War Powers Resolution ( 50 U.S.C. 1541 (c) Exceptions The prohibition under subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to the introduction of the Armed Forces into hostilities— (1) to repel a sudden attack on the United States, its territories or possessions, or its Armed Forces, or its allies; or (2) to rescue or remove United States personnel. (d) Rule of construction Nothing in this section may be construed to affect or alter the requirements of the War Powers Resolution ( 50 U.S.C. 1541

Summary: No Unconstitutional Strike against North Korea Act This bill expresses the sense of Congress that: (1) a conflict on the Korean peninsula would have catastrophic consequences; (2) actions and statements that increase tensions between the United States and North Korea should be avoided; and (3) the President should engage in talks with North Korea to reduce tensions and improve communication, initiate negotiations to achieve a diplomatic agreement to halt and eventually reverse North Korea's nuclear pursuits, and move toward denuclearization and a permanent peace in the Korean peninsula. Funds available to the Department of Defense or to any other federal department or agency may not be used to launch a military strike against North Korea or otherwise introduce U.S. Armed Forces into hostilities in North Korea before the earlier of: (1) the date on which Congress declares war on North Korea, or (2) the date of an authorization that meets the requirements of the War Powers Resolution and that is enacted after the enactment of this bill. Such prohibition shall not apply to military force used to: (1) repel a sudden attack on the United States, its territories or possessions, its Armed Forces, or its allies; or (2) rescue or remove U. S. personnel.