Clean Water Affordability Act of 2015

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to assist municipalities and regional sewer authorities that would experience a significant hardship raising the revenue necessary to finance projects and activities for the construction of wastewater treatment works, and for other purposes. 1. Short title; table of contents (a) Short title This Act may be cited as the Clean Water Affordability Act of 2015 (b) Table of contents The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Title I—Clean Water Affordability Sec. 101. Integrated planning process. Sec. 102. Updating of guidance. Sec. 103. Capitalization grant agreements. Title II—Wet Weather Management Sec. 201. Technology-based controls for peak wet weather management. Sec. 202. Wet weather water quality-based standards. Sec. 203. Peak wet weather waste water management techniques. I Clean Water Affordability 101. Integrated planning process (a) In general Section 402(a) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1342(a) (6) Integrated Permits (A) Definition of publicly owned permittee In this paragraph, the term publicly owned permittee (i) a treatment works (as defined in section 212) that is publicly owned; or (ii) a municipal separate storm sewer system referred to in this section. (B) Planning approach The Administrator shall establish a comprehensive and integrated planning approach to the obligations under this section of a publicly owned permittee— (i) under which permit obligations may be implemented according to a schedule that— (I) accounts for the financial capability of the publicly owned permittee; (II) prioritizes permit obligations according to the most cost-effective and environmentally beneficial outcomes; (III) accounts for the preexisting maintenance, operational, and regulatory obligations of the publicly owned permittee under this section; and (IV) enables the publicly owned permittee to implement innovative approaches to meet those obligations; and (ii) that accounts for changed circumstances in the obligations of the publicly owned permittee, such as— (I) new innovative treatment approaches; (II) new regulatory requirements; and (III) changes in financial capability. . (b) Duration of permits Section 402(b)(1)(B) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1342(b)(1)(B) , except that a permit with a term of more than 5 years but not more than 25 years may be approved if the permittee has an approved integrated plan established under subsection (a)(6) 102. Updating of guidance (a) Definitions In this section, the following definitions apply: (1) Administrator The term Administrator (2) Affordability The term affordability (3) Financial capability The term financial capability (4) Guidance The term guidance Combined Sewer Overflows—Guidance for Financial Capability Assessment and Schedule Development (b) Updating (1) In general Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall update the guidance to ensure that the evaluations by the Administrator of financial capability assessment and schedule development meet the criteria described in paragraph (2). (2) Criteria The criteria described in this paragraph are that, under the updated guidance— (A) in assessing the financial capability of a community— (i) greater emphasis should be placed on local economic conditions; (ii) for regional systems, consideration should be given to the economic conditions of political jurisdictions and significant demographic groups within each region; (iii) prescriptive formulas for use in calculating financial capability and thresholds for expenditure should not be considered to be the only indicator of the financial capability of a community; (iv) site-specific local conditions should be taken into consideration in analyzing financial capability; (v) a single measure of financial capability or affordability (such as median household income) should be viewed in the context of other economic measures, rather than as a threshold to be achieved; and (vi) (I) consideration should be given to the economic outlook of a community, including the potential impact of program requirements over time, in the development of implementation schedules; and (II) the assessment should take into consideration other essential community investments relating to water quality improvements; (B) with respect to the timing of implementation of water quality-related improvements— (i) environmental improvement implementation schedules should be structured to mitigate the potential adverse impact on distressed populations resulting from the costs of the improvements; (ii) implementation schedules should reflect local community financial conditions and economic impacts; (iii) implementation schedules should allow permittees up to 30 years to implement water quality-related improvements in appropriate cases in which the cost of implementing the improvements places a high financial burden on the permittee; and (iv) existing implementation schedules should be modified in appropriate cases taking into consideration the criteria set forth in this subparagraph; (C) with respect to implementation— (i) a determination of local financial capability may be achieved through an evaluation of an array of factors the relative importance of which may vary across regions and localities; and (ii) an appropriate methodology should give consideration to such various factors as are appropriate to recognize the prevailing and projected economic concerns in a community; and (D) the residential indicator should be revised to include— (i) a consideration of costs imposed upon ratepayers for essential utilities; (ii) increased consideration and quantification of local community-imposed costs in regional systems; (iii) a mechanism to assess impacts on communities with disparate economic conditions throughout the entire service area of a utility; (iv) a consideration of the industrial and population trends of a community; (v) recognition that— (I) the median household income of a service area reflects a numerical median rather than the distribution of incomes within the service area; and (II) more representative methods of determining affordability, such as shelter costs, essential utility payments, State affordability criteria, and State and local tax efforts, should be considered; (vi) a consideration of low-income ratepayer percentages; and (vii) impacts relating to program delivery, such as water quality infrastructure market saturation and program management. (3) Implementation The updated guidance should indicate that, in a case in which a previously approved long-term control plan or associated enforceable agreement does not prohibit modification of the plan or terms of the agreement (including financial capability considerations), and all parties are in agreement that a change is needed or that the plan or agreement does not prohibit reopening to address changes in the economic or financial status of the community since the effective date of the plan or agreement, reconsideration and modification of financial capability determinations and implementation schedules based on the criteria described in paragraph (2) is appropriate. (4) Applicability The Administrator shall apply the updated guidance, including the criteria described in paragraph (2), to each determination and analysis of affordability, financial capability, or widespread and substantial economic impact related to implementation of a program under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. (c) Publication and submission Upon completion of the updating of guidance under subsection (b), the Administrator shall publish in the Federal Register and submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives the updated guidance. 103. Capitalization grant agreements Section 602(b) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1382(b) (1) by striking and (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (10) and inserting ; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (11) the State will use at least 15 percent of the amount of each capitalization grant received by the State under this title after September 30, 2016, to provide assistance to municipalities of fewer than 10,000 individuals that meet the affordability criteria established by the State under section 603(i)(2) for activities included on the State’s priority list established under section 603(g), to the extent that there are sufficient applications for such assistance. . II Wet Weather Management 201. Technology-based controls for peak wet weather management (a) Applicability of effluent limitations Section 301(b)(1)(B) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1311(b)(1)(B) , which effluent limitations shall apply at the final point of discharge from the treatment facility and not to flows within the treatment facility; (b) Modification of effluent limitations during peak wet weather Section 301 of such Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1311 (q) Modification of effluent limitations during peak wet weather The Administrator, with concurrence of the State, may issue permits pursuant to section 402 that modify the requirements of subsection (b)(1)(B) with respect to the discharge of any pollutant from a collection system servicing a publicly owned treatment works during periods of peak wet weather, if the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Administrator that the applicant has a peak wet weather management plan approved by the Administrator or State that— (1) defines the peak wet weather event during which the plan will apply; and (2) describes the management practices to be used by the applicant during peak wet weather events pursuant to guidelines established by the Administrator under section 304(d)(2). . 202. Wet weather water quality-based standards Section 303(c)(2) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1313(c)(2) (C) (i) States may adopt peak wet weather-related water quality standards for receiving waters during periods of peak wet weather events (as determined pursuant to section 304(d)(2)). (ii) The Administrator, after consultation with States and not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this subparagraph, and from time to time thereafter, shall develop and publish guidance to States on developing and implementing peak wet weather-related water quality standards to accommodate peak wet weather discharges. . 203. Peak wet weather waste water management techniques Section 304(d) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1314(d) (1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (4) as paragraphs (3) through (5), respectively; and (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following: (2) Peak wet weather flow practices and techniques (A) Information and guidelines The Administrator, after consultation with appropriate Federal and State agencies and other interested parties, shall publish not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of the Clean Water Affordability Act of 2015 (i) prevent damage to the treatment facility; (ii) maximize the delivery of flow to the treatment facility; and (iii) provide for appropriate cost-effective controls during peak wet weather events. (B) Contents of guidelines The guidelines shall include options for the types of technologies and management approaches available to manage peak wet weather-related wastewater flows, including— (i) technologies and management approaches relating to facility and collection system storage methods (including in-system treatment methods throughout the collection system); (ii) facility and collection systems operations and maintenance systems; (iii) monitoring and reporting systems; and (iv) alternative treatment methods and technologies that can achieve applicable water quality. .

Summary: Clean Water Affordability Act of 2015 This bill amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (commonly known as the Clean Water Act) to require the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish a comprehensive and integrated planning approach to the permit obligations under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program of a publicly owned treatment works (POTW) or a municipal separate storm sewer system. A state may extend the term of a NPDES permit to up to 25 years under a state-administered NPDES program, if the permittee has an approved integrated plan. The EPA must update the guidance entitled &quot;Combined Sewer Overflows--Guidance for Financial Capability Assessment and Schedule Development,&quot; to ensure that the evaluations by the EPA of financial capability assessment and schedule development meet specified criteria. States must set aside 15% of the amount of each capitalization grant they receive for water pollution control revolving funds to provide assistance to municipalities of fewer than 10,000 individuals that meet specified affordability criteria for activities on the state's priority list of POTW construction projects. Effluent limitations must be applied at the final point of discharge from a POTW treatment facility and not to flows within the facility. The EPA may issue NPDES permits with modified effluent limits for discharges of pollutants from a collection system servicing a POTW during periods of peak wet weather if a state concurs and the permit applicant has an approved peak wet weather management plan. States may adopt peak wet weather-related water quality standards for receiving waters during periods of peak wet weather events. The EPA must develop and publish guidance with respect to peak wet weather-related water quality standards and waste water management practices.