Defense of Environment and Property Act of 2015

To clarify the definition of navigable waters, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Defense of Environment and Property Act of 2015 2. Navigable waters (a) In general Section 502 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1362 (7) Navigable waters (A) In general The term navigable waters (i) navigable-in-fact; or (ii) permanent, standing, or continuously flowing bodies of water that form geographical features commonly known as streams, oceans, rivers, and lakes that are connected to waters that are navigable-in-fact. (B) Exclusions The term navigable waters (i) waters that— (I) do not physically abut waters described in subparagraph (A); and (II) lack a continuous surface water connection to navigable waters; (ii) man-made or natural structures or channels— (I) through which water flows intermittently or ephemerally; or (II) that periodically provide drainage for rainfall; or (iii) wetlands without a continuous surface connection to bodies of water that are waters of the United States. (C) EPA and Corps activities An activity carried out by the Administrator or the Corps of Engineers shall not, without explicit State authorization, impinge upon the traditional and primary power of States over land and water use. (D) Aggregation; wetlands (i) Aggregation Aggregation of wetlands or waters not described in clauses (i) through (iii) of subparagraph (B) shall not be used to determine or assert Federal jurisdiction. (ii) Wetlands Wetlands described in subparagraph (B)(iii) shall not be considered to be under Federal jurisdiction. (E) Judicial review If a jurisdictional determination by the Administrator or the Secretary of the Army would affect the ability of a State or individual property owner to plan the development and use (including restoration, preservation, and enhancement) of land and water resources, the State or individual property owner may obtain expedited judicial review not later than 30 days after the date on which the determination is made in a district court of the United States, of appropriate jurisdiction and venue, that is located within the State seeking the review. (F) Treatment of ground water Ground water shall— (i) be considered to be State water; and (ii) not be considered in determining or asserting Federal jurisdiction over isolated or other waters, including intermittent or ephemeral water bodies. (G) Prohibition on use of nexus test Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Administrator may not use a significant nexus test (as used by EPA in the proposed document listed in section 3(a)(1)) to determine Federal jurisdiction over navigable waters and waters of the United States. . (b) Applicability Nothing in this section or the amendments made by this section affects or alters any exemption under— (1) section 402(l) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1342(l) (2) section 404(f) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1344(f) 3. Applicability of agency regulations and guidance (a) In general The following regulations and guidance shall have no force or effect: (1) The final rule of the Corps of Engineers entitled Final Rule for Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers (2) The proposed rule of the Environmental Protection Agency entitled Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the Clean Water Act Regulatory Definition of Waters of the United States (3) The guidance document entitled Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision in Rapanos v. United States Carabell v. United States 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. (4) Any subsequent regulation of or guidance issued by any Federal agency that defines or interprets the term navigable waters waters of the United States (b) Prohibition The Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall not promulgate any rules or issue any guidance that expands or interprets the definition of navigable waters unless expressly authorized by Congress. 4. State regulation of water Nothing in this Act affects, amends, or supersedes— (1) the right of a State to regulate waters in the State; or (2) the duty of a landowner to adhere to any State nuisance laws (including regulations) relating to waters in the State. 5. Consent for entry by Federal representatives Section 308 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1318 (a) In general (1) Entry by Federal agency A representative of a Federal agency shall only enter private property to collect information about navigable waters if the owner of that property— (A) has consented to the entry in writing; (B) is notified regarding the date of the entry; and (C) is given access to any data collected from the entry. (2) Access If a landowner consents to entry under paragraph (1), the landowner shall have the right to be present at the time any data collection on the property of the landowner is carried out. . 6. Compensation for regulatory taking (a) In general If a Federal regulation relating to the definition of navigable waters or waters of the United States diminishes the fair market value or economic viability of a property, as determined by an independent appraiser, the Federal agency issuing the regulation shall pay the affected property owner an amount equal to twice the value of the loss. (b) Administration Any payment provided under subsection (a) shall be made from the amounts made available to the relevant agency head for general operations of the agency. (c) Applicability A Federal regulation described in subsection (a) shall have no force or effect until the date on which each landowner with a claim under this section relating to that regulation has been compensated in accordance with this section.

Summary: Defense of Environment and Property Act of 2015 This bill amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (commonly known as the Clean Water Act) to specify the types of water bodies that are &quot;navigable waters&quot; and therefore fall under the scope of the Act. Groundwater is considered to be state water. Activities carried out by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers may not impinge upon states' power over land and water use. States or individual property owners may obtain judicial review of jurisdictional determinations by the EPA or the Army Corps that would affect their ability to plan the development and use of land and water resources within 30 days after a determination. The EPA may not use a significant nexus test to determine federal jurisdiction over navigable waters and waters of the United States. The following rules are nullified: (1) the Army Corps' rule entitled &quot;Final Rule for Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers,&quot; (2) the EPA's proposed rule entitled &quot;Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the Clean Water Act Regulatory Definition of 'Waters of the United States,'&quot; (3) the guidance document entitled &quot;Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Following the U.S. Supreme Court's Decision in Rapanos v. United States &amp; Carabell v. United States&quot; (relating to the definition of waters under the jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act), and (4) any subsequent regulation or guidance issued by federal agencies that defines or interprets the term &quot;navigable waters.&quot; The Army Corps and the EPA may not promulgate rules or issue guidance that expands or interprets the definition of navigable waters unless expressly authorized by Congress. Federal agencies must obtain the consent of private property owners prior to entering their land to collect information about navigable waters. Federal agencies that issue regulations that relate to the definition of navigable waters or waters of the United States and diminish the fair market value or economic viability of a property must pay the affected property owner an amount equal to twice the value of the loss. Until the landowners have been compensated, such a regulation will have no force or effect.