Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015

To reauthorize trade facilitation and trade enforcement functions and activities, and for other purposes. 1. Short title; table of contents (a) Short title This Act may be cited as the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (b) Table of contents The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Definitions. TITLE I—Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Sec. 101. Improving partnership programs. Sec. 102. Report on effectiveness of trade enforcement activities. Sec. 103. Priorities and performance standards for customs modernization, trade facilitation, and trade enforcement functions and programs. Sec. 104. Educational seminars to improve efforts to classify and appraise imported articles, to improve trade enforcement efforts, and to otherwise facilitate legitimate international trade. Sec. 105. Joint strategic plan. Sec. 106. Automated Commercial Environment. Sec. 107. International Trade Data System. Sec. 108. Consultations with respect to mutual recognition arrangements. Sec. 109. Commercial Customs Operations Advisory Committee. Sec. 110. Centers of Excellence and Expertise. Sec. 111. Commercial Targeting Division and National Targeting and Analysis Groups. Sec. 112. Report on oversight of revenue protection and enforcement measures. Sec. 113. Report on security and revenue measures with respect to merchandise transported in bond. Sec. 114. Importer of record program. Sec. 115. Establishment of new importer program. TITLE II—Import health and safety Sec. 201. Interagency import safety working group. Sec. 202. Joint import safety rapid response plan. Sec. 203. Training. TITLE III—Import-related protection of intellectual property rights Sec. 301. Definition of intellectual property rights. Sec. 302. Exchange of information related to trade enforcement. Sec. 303. Seizure of circumvention devices. Sec. 304. Enforcement by U.S. Customs and Border Protection of works for which copyright registration is pending. Sec. 305. National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center. Sec. 306. Joint strategic plan for the enforcement of intellectual property rights. Sec. 307. Personnel dedicated to the enforcement of intellectual property rights. Sec. 308. Training with respect to the enforcement of intellectual property rights. Sec. 309. International cooperation and information sharing. Sec. 310. Report on intellectual property rights enforcement. Sec. 311. Information for travelers regarding violations of intellectual property rights. TITLE IV—Evasion of antidumping and countervailing duty orders Sec. 401. Short title. Sec. 402. Procedures for investigating claims of evasion of antidumping and countervailing duty orders. Sec. 403. Annual report on prevention and investigation of evasion of antidumping and countervailing duty orders. TITLE V—Amendments to antidumping and countervailing duty laws Sec. 501. Consequences of failure to cooperate with a request for information in a proceeding. Sec. 502. Definition of material injury. Sec. 503. Particular market situation. Sec. 504. Distortion of prices or costs. Sec. 505. Reduction in burden on Department of Commerce by reducing the number of voluntary respondents. Sec. 506. Application to Canada and Mexico. TITLE VI—Additional trade enforcement and intellectual property rights protection Subtitle A—Trade enforcement Sec. 601. Trade enforcement priorities. Sec. 602. Exercise of WTO authorization to suspend concessions or other obligations under trade agreements. Sec. 603. Trade monitoring. Sec. 604. Establishment of Interagency Trade Enforcement Center. Sec. 605. Establishment of Chief Manufacturing Negotiator. Sec. 606. Enforcement under title III of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to certain acts, policies, and practices relating to the environment. Sec. 607. Trade Enforcement Trust Fund. Sec. 608. Honey transshipment. Sec. 609. Inclusion of interest in certain distributions of antidumping duties and countervailing duties. Sec. 610. Illicitly imported, exported, or trafficked cultural property, archaeological or ethnological materials, and fish, wildlife, and plants. Subtitle B—Intellectual property rights protection Sec. 611. Establishment of Chief Innovation and Intellectual Property Negotiator. Sec. 612. Measures relating to countries that deny adequate protection for intellectual property rights. TITLE VII—Currency manipulation Subtitle A—Investigation of currency undervaluation Sec. 701. Short title. Sec. 702. Investigation or review of currency undervaluation under countervailing duty law. Sec. 703. Benefit calculation methodology with respect to currency undervaluation. Sec. 704. Modification of definition of specificity with respect to export subsidy. Sec. 705. Application to Canada and Mexico. Sec. 706. Effective date. Subtitle B—Engagement on Currency Exchange Rate and Economic Policies Sec. 711. Enhancement of engagement on currency exchange rate and economic policies with certain major trading partners of the United States. Sec. 712. Advisory Committee on International Exchange Rate Policy. TITLE VIII—Process for consideration of temporary duty suspensions and reductions Sec. 801. Short title. Sec. 802. Sense of Congress on the need for a miscellaneous tariff bill. Sec. 803. Process for consideration of duty suspensions and reductions. Sec. 804. Report on effects of duty suspensions and reductions on United States economy. Sec. 805. Judicial review precluded. Sec. 806. Definitions. TITLE IX—Miscellaneous provisions Sec. 901. De minimis value. Sec. 902. Consultation on trade and customs revenue functions. Sec. 903. Penalties for customs brokers. Sec. 904. Amendments to chapter 98 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. Sec. 905. Exemption from duty of residue of bulk cargo contained in instruments of international traffic previously exported from the United States. Sec. 906. Drawback and refunds. Sec. 907. Inclusion of certain information in submission of nomination for appointment as Deputy United States Trade Representative. Sec. 908. Biennial reports regarding competitiveness issues facing the United States economy and competitive conditions for certain key United States industries. Sec. 909. Report on certain U.S. Customs and Border Protection agreements. Sec. 910. Charter flights. Sec. 911. Amendment to Tariff Act of 1930 to require country of origin marking of certain castings. Sec. 912. Elimination of consumptive demand exception to prohibition on importation of goods made with convict labor, forced labor, or indentured labor; report. Sec. 913. Improved collection and use of labor market information. Sec. 914. Statements of policy with respect to Israel. TITLE X—Offsets Sec. 1001. Revocation or denial of passport in case of certain unpaid taxes. Sec. 1002. Customs user fees. 2. Definitions In this Act: (1) Automated Commercial Environment The term Automated Commercial Environment 19 U.S.C. 58c(f)(4) (2) Commissioner The term Commissioner (3) Customs and trade laws of the United States The term customs and trade laws of the United States (A) The Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1202 et seq. (B) Section 249 of the Revised Statutes ( 19 U.S.C. 3 (C) Section 2 of the Act of March 4, 1923 (42 Stat. 1453, chapter 251; 19 U.S.C. 6 (D) The Act of March 3, 1927 (44 Stat. 1381, chapter 348; 19 U.S.C. 2071 et seq. (E) Section 13031 of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 ( 19 U.S.C. 58c (F) Section 251 of the Revised Statutes ( 19 U.S.C. 66 (G) Section 1 of the Act of June 26, 1930 (46 Stat. 817, chapter 617; 19 U.S.C. 68 (H) The Foreign Trade Zones Act ( 19 U.S.C. 81a et seq. (I) Section 1 of the Act of March 2, 1911 (36 Stat. 965, chapter 191; 19 U.S.C. 198 (J) The Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2102 et seq. (K) The Trade Agreements Act of 1979 ( 19 U.S.C. 2501 et seq. (L) The North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act ( 19 U.S.C. 3301 et seq. (M) The Uruguay Round Agreements Act ( 19 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. (N) The Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act ( 19 U.S.C. 2701 et seq. (O) The Andean Trade Preference Act ( 19 U.S.C. 3201 et seq. (P) The African Growth and Opportunity Act ( 19 U.S.C. 3701 et seq. (Q) The Customs Enforcement Act of 1986 ( Public Law 99–570 (R) The Customs and Trade Act of 1990 ( Public Law 101–382 (S) The Customs Procedural Reform and Simplification Act of 1978 ( Public Law 95–410 (T) The Trade Act of 2002 ( Public Law 107–210 (U) The Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act ( 19 U.S.C. 2601 et seq. (V) The Act of March 28, 1928 (45 Stat. 374, chapter 266; 19 U.S.C. 2077 et seq. (W) The Act of August 7, 1939 (53 Stat. 1263, chapter 566). (X) Any other provision of law implementing a trade agreement. (Y) Any other provision of law vesting customs revenue functions in the Secretary of the Treasury. (Z) Any other provision of law relating to trade facilitation or trade enforcement that is administered by U.S. Customs and Border Protection on behalf of any Federal agency that is required to participate in the International Trade Data System. (AA) Any other provision of customs or trade law administered by U.S. Customs and Border Protection or U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (4) Private sector entity The term private sector entity (A) an importer; (B) an exporter; (C) a forwarder; (D) an air, sea, or land carrier or shipper; (E) a contract logistics provider; (F) a customs broker; or (G) any other person (other than an employee of a government) affected by the implementation of the customs and trade laws of the United States. (5) Trade enforcement The term trade enforcement (6) Trade facilitation The term trade facilitation I Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement 101. Improving partnership programs (a) In general In order to advance the security, trade enforcement, and trade facilitation missions of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Commissioner shall ensure that partnership programs of U.S. Customs and Border Protection established before the date of the enactment of this Act, such as the Customs–Trade Partnership Against Terrorism established under subtitle B of title II of the Security and Accountability for Every Port Act of 2006 ( 6 U.S.C. 961 et seq. (b) Elements In developing and operating partnership programs under subsection (a), the Commissioner shall— (1) consult with private sector entities, the public, and other Federal agencies when appropriate, to ensure that participants in those programs receive commercially significant and measurable trade benefits, including providing preclearance of merchandise for qualified persons that demonstrate the highest levels of compliance with the customs and trade laws of the United States, regulations of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and other requirements the Commissioner determines to be necessary; (2) ensure an integrated and transparent system of trade benefits and compliance requirements for all partnership programs of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; (3) consider consolidating partnership programs in situations in which doing so would support the objectives of such programs, increase participation in such programs, enhance the trade benefits provided to participants in such programs, and enhance the allocation of the resources of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; (4) coordinate with the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and other Federal agencies with authority to detain and release merchandise entering the United States— (A) to ensure coordination in the release of such merchandise through the Automated Commercial Environment, or its predecessor, and the International Trade Data System; (B) to ensure that the partnership programs of those agencies are compatible with the partnership programs of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; (C) to develop criteria for authorizing the release, on an expedited basis, of merchandise for which documentation is required from one or more of those agencies to clear or license the merchandise for entry into the United States; and (D) to create pathways, within and among the appropriate Federal agencies, for qualified persons that demonstrate the highest levels of compliance to receive immediate clearance absent information that a transaction may pose a national security or compliance threat; and (5) ensure that trade benefits are provided to participants in partnership programs. (c) Report required Not later than the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and December 31 of each year thereafter, the Commissioner shall submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a report that— (1) identifies each partnership program referred to in subsection (a); (2) for each such program, identifies— (A) the requirements for participants in the program; (B) the commercially significant and measurable trade benefits provided to participants in the program; (C) the number of participants in the program; and (D) in the case of a program that provides for participation at multiple tiers, the number of participants at each such tier; (3) identifies the number of participants enrolled in more than one such partnership program; (4) assesses the effectiveness of each such partnership program in advancing the security, trade enforcement, and trade facilitation missions of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, based on historical developments, the level of participation in the program, and the evolution of benefits provided to participants in the program; (5) summarizes the efforts of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to work with other Federal agencies with authority to detain and release merchandise entering the United States to ensure that partnership programs of those agencies are compatible with partnership programs of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; (6) summarizes criteria developed with those agencies for authorizing the release, on an expedited basis, of merchandise for which documentation is required from one or more of those agencies to clear or license the merchandise for entry into the United States; (7) summarizes the efforts of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to work with private sector entities and the public to develop and improve partnership programs referred to in subsection (a); (8) describes measures taken by U.S. Customs and Border Protection to make private sector entities aware of the trade benefits available to participants in such programs; and (9) summarizes the plans, targets, and goals of U.S. Customs and Border Protection with respect to such programs for the 2 years following the submission of the report. 102. Report on effectiveness of trade enforcement activities (a) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a report on the effectiveness of trade enforcement activities of U.S. Customs and Border Protection. (b) Contents The report required by subsection (a) shall include— (1) a description of the use of resources, results of audits and verifications, targeting, organization, and training of personnel of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; (2) a description of trade enforcement activities to address undervaluation, transshipment, legitimacy of entities making entry, protection of revenues, fraud prevention and detection, and penalties, including intentional misclassification, inadequate bonding, and other misrepresentations; and (3) a description of trade enforcement activities with respect to the priority trade issues described in paragraph (3)(B)(ii) of section 2(d) of the Act of March 3, 1927 (44 Stat. 1381, chapter 348; 19 U.S.C. 2072(d) (A) methodologies used in such enforcement activities, such as targeting; (B) recommendations for improving such enforcement activities; and (C) a description of the implementation of previous recommendations for improving such enforcement activities. (c) Form of report The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 103. Priorities and performance standards for customs modernization, trade facilitation, and trade enforcement functions and programs (a) Priorities and performance standards (1) In general The Commissioner, in consultation with the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, shall establish priorities and performance standards to measure the development and levels of achievement of the customs modernization, trade facilitation, and trade enforcement functions and programs described in subsection (b). (2) Minimum priorities and standards Such priorities and performance standards shall, at a minimum, include priorities and standards relating to efficiency, outcome, output, and other types of applicable measures. (b) Functions and programs described The functions and programs referred to in subsection (a) are the following: (1) The Automated Commercial Environment. (2) Each of the priority trade issues described in paragraph (3)(B)(ii) of section 2(d) of the Act of March 3, 1927 (44 Stat. 1381, chapter 348; 19 U.S.C. 2072(d) (3) The Centers of Excellence and Expertise described in section 110 of this Act. (4) Drawback for exported merchandise under section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1313 (5) Transactions relating to imported merchandise in bond. (6) Collection of countervailing duties assessed under subtitle A of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1671 et seq. 19 U.S.C. 1673 et seq. (7) The expedited clearance of cargo. (8) The issuance of regulations and rulings. (9) The issuance of Regulatory Audit Reports. (c) Consultations and notification (1) Consultations The consultations required by subsection (a)(1) shall occur, at a minimum, on an annual basis. (2) Notification The Commissioner shall notify the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives of any changes to the priorities referred to in subsection (a) not later than 30 days before such changes are to take effect. 104. Educational seminars to improve efforts to classify and appraise imported articles, to improve trade enforcement efforts, and to otherwise facilitate legitimate international trade (a) In general (1) Establishment The Commissioner and the Director shall establish and carry out on a fiscal year basis educational seminars to— (A) improve the ability of U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel to classify and appraise articles imported into the United States in accordance with the customs and trade laws of the United States; (B) improve the trade enforcement efforts of U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel; and (C) otherwise improve the ability and effectiveness of U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel to facilitate legitimate international trade. (b) Content (1) Classifying and appraising imported articles In carrying out subsection (a)(1)(A), the Commissioner, the Director, and interested parties in the private sector selected under subsection (c) shall provide instruction and related instructional materials at each educational seminar under this section to U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel and, as appropriate, to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel on the following: (A) Conducting a physical inspection of an article imported into the United States, including testing of samples of the article, to determine if the article is mislabeled in the manifest or other accompanying documentation. (B) Reviewing the manifest and other accompanying documentation of an article imported into the United States to determine if the country of origin of the article listed in the manifest or other accompanying documentation is accurate. (C) Customs valuation. (D) Industry supply chains and other related matters as determined to be appropriate by the Commissioner. (2) Trade enforcement efforts In carrying out subsection (a)(1)(B), the Commissioner, the Director, and interested parties in the private sector selected under subsection (c) shall provide instruction and related instructional materials at each educational seminar under this section to U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel and, as appropriate, to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel to identify opportunities to enhance enforcement of the following: (A) Collection of countervailing duties assessed under subtitle A of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1671 et seq. 19 U.S.C. 1673 et seq. (B) Addressing evasion of duties on imports of textiles. (C) Protection of intellectual property rights. (D) Enforcement of child labor laws. (3) Approval of Commissioner and Director The instruction and related instructional materials at each educational seminar under this section shall be subject to the approval of the Commissioner and the Director. (c) Selection process (1) In general The Commissioner shall establish a process to solicit, evaluate, and select interested parties in the private sector for purposes of assisting in providing instruction and related instructional materials described in subsection (b) at each educational seminar under this section. (2) Criteria The Commissioner shall evaluate and select interested parties in the private sector under the process established under paragraph (1) based on— (A) availability and usefulness; (B) the volume, value, and incidence of mislabeling or misidentification of origin of imported articles; and (C) other appropriate criteria established by the Commissioner. (3) Public availability The Commissioner and the Director shall publish in the Federal Register a detailed description of the process established under paragraph (1) and the criteria established under paragraph (2). (d) Special rule for antidumping and countervailing duty orders (1) In general The Commissioner shall give due consideration to carrying out an educational seminar under this section in whole or in part to improve the ability of U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel to enforce a countervailing or antidumping duty order issued under section 706 or 736 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671e or 1673e) upon the request of a petitioner in an action underlying such countervailing or antidumping duty order. (2) Interested party A petitioner described in paragraph (1) shall be treated as an interested party in the private sector for purposes of the requirements of this section. (e) Performance standards The Commissioner and the Director shall establish performance standards to measure the development and level of achievement of educational seminars under this section. (f) Reporting Beginning September 30, 2016, the Commissioner and the Director shall submit to the Committee of Finance of the Senate and the Committee of Ways and Means of the House of Representatives an annual report on the effectiveness of educational seminars under this section. (g) Definitions In this section: (1) Director The term Director (2) United States The term United States (3) U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel The term U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel (4) U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel The term U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel 105. Joint strategic plan (a) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 2 years thereafter, the Commissioner and the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement shall jointly develop and submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, a joint strategic plan. (b) Contents The joint strategic plan required under this section shall be comprised of a comprehensive multi-year plan for trade enforcement and trade facilitation, and shall include— (1) a summary of actions taken during the 2-year period preceding the submission of the plan to improve trade enforcement and trade facilitation, including a description and analysis of specific performance measures to evaluate the progress of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in meeting each such responsibility; (2) a statement of objectives and plans for further improving trade enforcement and trade facilitation; (3) a specific identification of the priority trade issues described in paragraph (3)(B)(ii) of section 2(d) of the Act of March 3, 1927 (44 Stat. 1381, chapter 348; 19 U.S.C. 2072(d) (A) a description of the targeting methodologies used for enforcement activities with respect to each such issue; (B) recommendations for improving such enforcement activities; and (C) a description of the implementation of previous recommendations for improving such enforcement activities; (4) a description of efforts made to improve consultation and coordination among and within Federal agencies, and in particular between U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, regarding trade enforcement and trade facilitation; (5) a description of the training that has occurred to date within U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to improve trade enforcement and trade facilitation, including training under section 104 of this Act; (6) a description of efforts to work with the World Customs Organization and other international organizations, in consultation with other Federal agencies as appropriate, with respect to enhancing trade enforcement and trade facilitation; (7) a description of U.S. Customs and Border Protection organizational benchmarks for optimizing staffing and wait times at ports of entry; (8) a specific identification of any domestic or international best practices that may further improve trade enforcement and trade facilitation; (9) any legislative recommendations to further improve trade enforcement and trade facilitation; and (10) a description of efforts made to improve consultation and coordination with the private sector to enhance trade enforcement and trade facilitation. (c) Consultations (1) In general In developing the joint strategic plan required under this section, the Commissioner and the Director shall consult with— (A) appropriate officials from the relevant Federal agencies, including— (i) the Department of the Treasury; (ii) the Department of Agriculture; (iii) the Department of Commerce; (iv) the Department of Justice; (v) the Department of the Interior; (vi) the Department of Health and Human Services; (vii) the Food and Drug Administration; (viii) the Consumer Product Safety Commission; and (ix) the Office of the United States Trade Representative; and (B) the Commercial Customs Operations Advisory Committee established by section 109 of this Act. (2) Other consultations In developing the joint strategic plan required under this section, the Commissioner and the Director shall seek to consult with— (A) appropriate officials from relevant foreign law enforcement agencies and international organizations, including the World Customs Organization; and (B) interested parties in the private sector. (d) Form of plan The plan required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 106. Automated Commercial Environment (a) Funding Section 13031(f)(4)(B) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 ( 19 U.S.C. 58c(f)(4)(B) (1) by striking 2003 through 2005 2016 through 2018 (2) by striking such amounts as are available in that Account not less than $153,736,000 (3) by striking for the development to complete the development and implementation (b) Report Section 311(b)(3) of the Customs Border Security Act of 2002 ( 19 U.S.C. 2075 (3) Report (A) In general Not later than December 31, 2016, the Commissioner responsible for U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall submit to the Committee on Appropriations and the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Appropriations and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a report detailing— (i) U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s incorporation of all core trade processing capabilities, including cargo release, entry summary, cargo manifest, cargo financial data, and export data elements into the Automated Commercial Environment computer system authorized under section 13031(f)(4) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget and Reconciliation Act of 1985 ( 19 U.S.C. 58c(f)(4) (ii) U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s remaining priorities for processing entry summary data elements, cargo manifest data elements, cargo financial data elements, and export elements in the Automated Commercial Environment computer system, and the objectives and plans for implementing these remaining priorities; (iii) the components of the National Customs Automation Program specified in subsection (a)(2) of section 411 of the Tariff Act of 1930 that have not been implemented; and (iv) any additional components of the National Customs Automation Program initiated by the Commissioner to complete the development, establishment, and implementation of the Automated Commercial Environment computer system. (B) Update of reports Not later than September 30, 2017, the Commissioner shall submit to the Committee on Appropriations and the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Appropriations and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives an updated report addressing each of the matters referred to in subparagraph (A), and— (i) evaluating the effectiveness of the implementation of the Automated Commercial Environment computer system; and (ii) detailing the percentage of trade processed in the Automated Commercial Environment every month since September 30, 2016. . (c) Government accountability office report Not later than December 31, 2017, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Appropriations and the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Appropriations and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a report— (1) assessing the progress of other Federal agencies in accessing and utilizing the Automated Commercial Environment; and (2) assessing the potential cost savings to the United States Government and importers and exporters and the potential benefits to enforcement of the customs and trade laws of the United States if the elements identified in clauses (i) through (iv) of section 311(b)(3)(A) of the Customs Border Security Act of 2002, as amended by subsection (b) of this section, are implemented. 107. International Trade Data System (a) Information technology infrastructure Section 411(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1411(d) (1) by redesignating paragraphs (4) through (7) as paragraphs (5) through (8), respectively; (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following: (4) Information technology infrastructure (A) In general The Secretary shall work with the head of each agency participating in the ITDS and the Interagency Steering Committee to ensure that each agency— (i) develops and maintains the necessary information technology infrastructure to support the operation of the ITDS and to submit all data to the ITDS electronically; (ii) enters into a memorandum of understanding, or takes such other action as is necessary, to provide for the information sharing between the agency and U.S. Customs and Border Protection necessary for the operation and maintenance of the ITDS; (iii) not later than June 30, 2016, identifies and transmits to the Commissioner responsible for U.S. Customs and Border Protection the admissibility criteria and data elements required by the agency to authorize the release of cargo by U.S. Customs and Border Protection for incorporation into the operational functionality of the Automated Commercial Environment computer system authorized under section 13031(f)(4) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget and Reconciliation Act of 1985 ( 19 U.S.C. 58c(f)(4) (iv) not later than December 31, 2016, utilizes the ITDS as the primary means of receiving from users the standard set of data and other relevant documentation, exclusive of applications for permits, licenses, or certifications required for the release of imported cargo and clearance of cargo for export. (B) Rule of construction Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to require any action to be taken that would compromise an ongoing law enforcement investigation or national security. ; and (3) in paragraph (8), as redesignated, by striking section 9503(c) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 ( 19 U.S.C. 2071 section 109 of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 108. Consultations with respect to mutual recognition arrangements (a) Consultations The Secretary of Homeland Security, with respect to any proposed mutual recognition arrangement or similar agreement between the United States and a foreign government providing for mutual recognition of supply chain security programs and customs revenue functions, shall consult— (1) not later than 30 days before initiating negotiations to enter into any such arrangement or similar agreement, with the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives; and (2) not later than 30 days before entering into any such arrangement or similar agreement, with the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives. (b) Negotiating objective It shall be a negotiating objective of the United States in any negotiation for a mutual recognition arrangement with a foreign country on partnership programs, such as the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism established under subtitle B of title II of the Security and Accountability for Every Port Act of 2006 ( 6 U.S.C. 961 et seq. 109. Commercial Customs Operations Advisory Committee (a) Establishment Not later than the date that is 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall jointly establish a Commercial Customs Operations Advisory Committee (in this section referred to as the Advisory Committee (b) Membership (1) In general The Advisory Committee shall be comprised of— (A) 20 individuals appointed under paragraph (2); (B) the Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy of the Department of the Treasury and the Commissioner, who shall jointly co-chair meetings of the Advisory Committee; and (C) the Assistant Secretary for Policy and the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement of the Department of Homeland Security, who shall serve as deputy co-chairs of meetings of the Advisory Committee. (2) Appointment (A) In general The Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall jointly appoint 20 individuals from the private sector to the Advisory Committee. (B) Requirements In making appointments under subparagraph (A), the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall appoint members— (i) to ensure that the membership of the Advisory Committee is representative of the individuals and firms affected by the commercial operations of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; and (ii) without regard to political affiliation. (C) Terms Each individual appointed to the Advisory Committee under this paragraph shall be appointed for a term of not more than 3 years, and may be reappointed to subsequent terms, but may not serve more than 2 terms sequentially. (3) Transfer of membership The Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Homeland Security may transfer members serving on the Advisory Committee on Commercial Operations of the United States Customs Service established under section 9503(c) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 ( 19 U.S.C. 2071 (c) Duties The Advisory Committee established under subsection (a) shall— (1) advise the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Homeland Security on all matters involving the commercial operations of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, including advising with respect to significant changes that are proposed with respect to regulations, policies, or practices of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; (2) provide recommendations to the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Homeland Security on improvements to the commercial operations of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; (3) collaborate in developing the agenda for Advisory Committee meetings; and (4) perform such other functions relating to the commercial operations of U.S. Customs and Border Protection as prescribed by law or as the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Homeland Security jointly direct. (d) Meetings (1) In general The Advisory Committee shall meet at the call of the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Homeland Security, or at the call of not less than two-thirds of the membership of the Advisory Committee. The Advisory Committee shall meet at least 4 times each calendar year. (2) Open meetings Notwithstanding section 10(a) (e) Annual report Not later than December 31, 2016, and annually thereafter, the Advisory Committee shall submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a report that— (1) describes the activities of the Advisory Committee during the preceding fiscal year; and (2) sets forth any recommendations of the Advisory Committee regarding the commercial operations of U.S. Customs and Border Protection. (f) Termination Section 14(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.; relating to the termination of advisory committees) shall not apply to the Advisory Committee. (g) Conforming amendment (1) In general Effective on the date on which the Advisory Committee is established under subsection (a), section 9503(c) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 ( 19 U.S.C. 2071 (2) Reference Any reference in law to the Advisory Committee on Commercial Operations of the United States Customs Service established under section 9503(c) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 ( 19 U.S.C. 2071 110. Centers of Excellence and Expertise (a) In general The Commissioner shall, in consultation with the Committee on Finance of the Senate, the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, and the Commercial Customs Operations Advisory Committee established by section 109 of this Act, develop and implement Centers of Excellence and Expertise throughout U.S. Customs and Border Protection that— (1) enhance the economic competitiveness of the United States by consistently enforcing the laws and regulations of the United States at all ports of entry of the United States and by facilitating the flow of legitimate trade through increasing industry-based knowledge; (2) improve enforcement efforts, including enforcement of priority trade issues described in subparagraph (B)(ii) of section 2(d)(3) of the Act of March 3, 1927 (44 Stat. 1381, chapter 348; 19 U.S.C. 2072(d) (3) build upon the expertise of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in particular industry operations, supply chains, and compliance requirements; (4) promote the uniform implementation at each port of entry of the United States of policies and regulations relating to imports; (5) centralize the trade enforcement and trade facilitation efforts of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; (6) formalize an account-based approach to apply, as the Commissioner determines appropriate, to the importation of merchandise into the United States; (7) foster partnerships though the expansion of trade programs and other trusted partner programs; (8) develop applicable performance measurements to meet internal efficiency and effectiveness goals; and (9) whenever feasible, facilitate a more efficient flow of information between Federal agencies. (b) Report Not later than December 31, 2016, the Commissioner shall submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a report describing— (1) the scope, functions, and structure of each Center of Excellence and Expertise developed and implemented under subsection (a); (2) the effectiveness of each such Center of Excellence and Expertise in improving enforcement efforts, including enforcement of priority trade issues, and facilitating legitimate trade; (3) the quantitative and qualitative benefits of each such Center of Excellence and Expertise to the trade community, including through fostering partnerships through the expansion of trade programs such as the Importer Self Assessment program and other trusted partner programs; (4) all applicable performance measurements with respect to each such Center of Excellence and Expertise, including performance measures with respect to meeting internal efficiency and effectiveness goals; (5) the performance of each such Center of Excellence and Expertise in increasing the accuracy and completeness of data with respect to international trade and facilitating a more efficient flow of information between Federal agencies; and (6) any planned changes in the number, scope, functions or any other aspect of the Centers of Excellence and Expertise developed and implemented under subsection (a). 111. Commercial Targeting Division and National Targeting and Analysis Groups (a) In general Section 2(d) of the Act of March 3, 1927 (44 Stat. 1381, chapter 348; 19 U.S.C. 2072(d) (3) Commercial targeting division and national targeting and analysis groups (A) Establishment of commercial targeting division (i) In general The Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish and maintain within the Office of International Trade a Commercial Targeting Division. (ii) Composition The Commercial Targeting Division shall be composed of— (I) headquarters personnel led by an Executive Director, who shall report to the Assistant Commissioner for Trade; and (II) individual National Targeting and Analysis Groups, each led by a Director who shall report to the Executive Director of the Commercial Targeting Division. (iii) Duties The Commercial Targeting Division shall be dedicated— (I) to the development and conduct of commercial risk assessment targeting with respect to cargo destined for the United States in accordance with subparagraph (C); and (II) to issuing Trade Alerts described in subparagraph (D). (B) National targeting and analysis groups (i) In general A National Targeting and Analysis Group referred to in subparagraph (A)(ii)(II) shall, at a minimum, be established for each priority trade issue described in clause (ii). (ii) Priority trade issues (I) In general The priority trade issues described in this clause are the following: (aa) Agriculture programs. (bb) Antidumping and countervailing duties. (cc) Import safety. (dd) Intellectual property rights. (ee) Revenue. (ff) Textiles and wearing apparel. (gg) Trade agreements and preference programs. (II) Modification The Commissioner is authorized to establish new priority trade issues and eliminate, consolidate, or otherwise modify the priority trade issues described in this paragraph if the Commissioner— (aa) determines it necessary and appropriate to do so; (bb) submits to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a summary of proposals to consolidate, eliminate, or otherwise modify existing priority trade issues not later than 60 days before such changes are to take effect; and (cc) submits to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a summary of proposals to establish new priority trade issues not later than 30 days after such changes are to take effect. (iii) Duties The duties of each National Targeting and Analysis Group shall include— (I) directing the trade enforcement and compliance assessment activities of U.S. Customs and Border Protection that relate to the Group’s priority trade issue; (II) facilitating, promoting, and coordinating cooperation and the exchange of information between U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and other relevant Federal departments and agencies regarding the Group’s priority trade issue; and (III) serving as the primary liaison between U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the public regarding United States Government activities regarding the Group’s priority trade issue, including— (aa) providing for receipt and transmission to the appropriate U.S. Customs and Border Protection office of allegations from interested parties in the private sector of violations of customs and trade laws of the United States of merchandise relating to the priority trade issue; (bb) obtaining information from the appropriate U.S. Customs and Border Protection office on the status of any activities resulting from the submission of any such allegation, including any decision not to pursue the allegation, and providing any such information to each interested party in the private sector that submitted the allegation every 90 days after the allegation was received by U.S. Customs and Border Protection unless providing such information would compromise an ongoing law enforcement investigation; and (cc) notifying on a timely basis each interested party in the private sector that submitted such allegation of any civil or criminal actions taken by U.S. Customs and Border Protection or other Federal department or agency resulting from the allegation. (C) Commercial risk assessment targeting In carrying out its duties with respect to commercial risk assessment targeting, the Commercial Targeting Division shall— (i) establish targeted risk assessment methodologies and standards— (I) for evaluating the risk that cargo destined for the United States may violate the customs and trade laws of the United States, particularly those laws applicable to merchandise subject to the priority trade issues described in subparagraph (B)(ii); and (II) for issuing, as appropriate, Trade Alerts described in subparagraph (D); and (ii) to the extent practicable and otherwise authorized by law, use, to administer the methodologies and standards established under clause (i)— (I) publicly available information; (II) information available from the Automated Commercial System, the Automated Commercial Environment computer system, the Automated Targeting System, the Automated Export System, the International Trade Data System, the TECS (formerly known as the Treasury Enforcement Communications System (III) information made available to the Commercial Targeting Division, including information provided by private sector entities. (D) Trade alerts (i) Issuance Based upon the application of the targeted risk assessment methodologies and standards established under subparagraph (C), the Executive Director of the Commercial Targeting Division and the Directors of the National Targeting and Analysis Groups may issue Trade Alerts to directors of United States ports of entry directing further inspection, or physical examination or testing, of specific merchandise to ensure compliance with all applicable customs and trade laws and regulations administered by U.S. Customs and Border Protection. (ii) Determinations not to implement trade alerts The director of a United States port of entry may determine not to conduct further inspections, or physical examination or testing, pursuant to a Trade Alert issued under clause (i) if the director— (I) finds that such a determination is justified by security interests; and (II) notifies the Assistant Commissioner of the Office of Field Operations and the Assistant Commissioner of International Trade of U.S. Customs and Border Protection of the determination and the reasons for the determination not later than 48 hours after making the determination. (iii) Summary of determinations not to implement The Assistant Commissioner of the Office of Field Operations of U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall— (I) compile an annual public summary of all determinations by directors of United States ports of entry under clause (ii) and the reasons for those determinations; (II) conduct an evaluation of the utilization of Trade Alerts issued under clause (i); and (III) submit the summary to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives not later than December 31 of each year. (iv) Inspection defined In this subparagraph, the term inspection (I) assessing duties; (II) identifying restricted or prohibited items; and (III) ensuring compliance with all applicable customs and trade laws and regulations administered by U.S. Customs and Border Protection. . (b) Use of trade data for commercial enforcement purposes Section 343(a)(3)(F) of the Trade Act of 2002 ( 19 U.S.C. 2071 (F) The information collected pursuant to the regulations shall be used exclusively for ensuring cargo safety and security, preventing smuggling, and commercial risk assessment targeting, and shall not be used for any commercial enforcement purposes, including for determining merchandise entry. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, nothing in this section shall be treated as amending, repealing, or otherwise modifying title IV of the Tariff Act of 1930 or regulations prescribed thereunder. . 112. Report on oversight of revenue protection and enforcement measures (a) In general Not later than March 31, 2016, and not later than March 31 of each second year thereafter, the Inspector General of the Department of the Treasury shall submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a report assessing, with respect to the period covered by the report, as specified in subsection (b), the following: (1) The effectiveness of the measures taken by U.S. Customs and Border Protection with respect to protection of revenue, including— (A) the collection of countervailing duties assessed under subtitle A of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1671 et seq. 19 U.S.C. 1673 et seq. (B) the assessment, collection, and mitigation of commercial fines and penalties; (C) the use of bonds, including continuous and single transaction bonds, to secure that revenue; and (D) the adequacy of the policies of U.S. Customs and Border Protection with respect to the monitoring and tracking of merchandise transported in bond and collecting duties, as appropriate. (2) The effectiveness of actions taken by U.S. Customs and Border Protection to measure accountability and performance with respect to protection of revenue. (3) The number and outcome of investigations instituted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection with respect to the underpayment of duties. (4) The effectiveness of training with respect to the collection of duties provided for personnel of U.S. Customs and Border Protection. (b) Period covered by report Each report required by subsection (a) shall cover the period of 2 fiscal years ending on September 30 of the calendar year preceding the submission of the report. 113. Report on security and revenue measures with respect to merchandise transported in bond (a) In general Not later than December 31 of 2016, 2017, and 2018, the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of the Treasury shall jointly submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a report on efforts undertaken by U.S. Customs and Border Protection to ensure the secure transportation of merchandise in bond through the United States and the collection of revenue owed upon the entry of such merchandise into the United States for consumption. (b) Elements Each report required by subsection (a) shall include, for the fiscal year preceding the submission of the report, information on— (1) the overall number of entries of merchandise for transportation in bond through the United States; (2) the ports at which merchandise arrives in the United States for transportation in bond and at which records of the arrival of such merchandise are generated; (3) the average time taken to reconcile such records with the records at the final destination of the merchandise in the United States to demonstrate that the merchandise reaches its final destination or is reexported; (4) the average time taken to transport merchandise in bond from the port at which the merchandise arrives in the United States to its final destination in the United States; (5) the total amount of duties, taxes, and fees owed with respect to shipments of merchandise transported in bond and the total amount of such duties, taxes, and fees paid; (6) the total number of notifications by carriers of merchandise being transported in bond that the destination of the merchandise has changed; and (7) the number of entries that remain unreconciled. 114. Importer of record program (a) Establishment Not later than the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish an importer of record program to assign and maintain importer of record numbers. (b) Requirements The Secretary shall ensure that, as part of the importer of record program, U.S. Customs and Border Protection— (1) develops criteria that importers must meet in order to obtain an importer of record number, including— (A) criteria to ensure sufficient information is collected to allow U.S. Customs and Border Protection to verify the existence of the importer requesting the importer of record number; (B) criteria to ensure sufficient information is collected to allow U.S. Customs and Border Protection to identify linkages or other affiliations between importers that are requesting or have been assigned importer of record numbers; and (C) criteria to ensure sufficient information is collected to allow U.S. Customs and Border Protection to identify changes in address and corporate structure of importers; (2) provides a process by which importers are assigned importer of record numbers; (3) maintains a centralized database of importer of record numbers, including a history of importer of record numbers associated with each importer, and the information described in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of paragraph (1); (4) evaluates and maintains the accuracy of the database if such information changes; and (5) takes measures to ensure that duplicate importer of record numbers are not issued. (c) Report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a report on the importer of record program established under subsection (a). (d) Number defined In this subsection, the term number 115. Establishment of new importer program (a) In general Not later than the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commissioner shall establish a new importer program that directs U.S. Customs and Border Protection to adjust bond amounts for new importers based on the level of risk assessed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection for protection of revenue of the Federal Government. (b) Requirements The Commissioner shall ensure that, as part of the new importer program established under subsection (a), U.S. Customs and Border Protection— (1) develops risk-based criteria for determining which importers are considered to be new importers for the purposes of this subsection; (2) develops risk assessment guidelines for new importers to determine if and to what extent— (A) to adjust bond amounts of imported products of new importers; and (B) to increase screening of imported products of new importers; (3) develops procedures to ensure increased oversight of imported products of new importers relating to the enforcement of the priority trade issues described in paragraph (3)(B)(ii) of section 2(d) of the Act of March 3, 1927 (44 Stat. 1381, chapter 348; 19 U.S.C. 2072(d) (4) develops procedures to ensure increased oversight of imported products of new importers by Centers of Excellence and Expertise established under section 110 of this Act; and (5) establishes a centralized database of new importers to ensure accuracy of information that is required to be provided by new importers to U.S. Customs and Border Protection. II Import health and safety 201. Interagency import safety working group (a) Establishment There is established an interagency Import Safety Working Group. (b) Membership The interagency Import Safety Working Group shall consist of the following officials or their designees: (1) The Secretary of Homeland Security, who shall serve as the Chair. (2) The Secretary of Health and Human Services, who shall serve as the Vice Chair. (3) The Secretary of the Treasury. (4) The Secretary of Commerce. (5) The Secretary of Agriculture. (6) The United States Trade Representative. (7) The Director of the Office of Management and Budget. (8) The Commissioner of Food and Drugs. (9) The Commissioner responsible for U.S. Customs and Border Protection. (10) The Chairman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission. (11) The Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (12) The head of any other Federal agency designated by the President to participate in the interagency Import Safety Working Group, as appropriate. (c) Duties The duties of the interagency Import Safety Working Group shall include— (1) consulting on the development of the joint import safety rapid response plan required by section 202 of this Act; (2) periodically evaluating the adequacy of the plans, practices, and resources of the Federal Government dedicated to ensuring the safety of merchandise imported in the United States and the expeditious entry of such merchandise, including— (A) minimizing the duplication of efforts among agencies the heads of which are members of the interagency Import Safety Working Group and ensuring the compatibility of the policies and regulations of those agencies; and (B) recommending additional administrative actions, as appropriate, designed to ensure the safety of merchandise imported into the United States and the expeditious entry of such merchandise and considering the impact of those actions on private sector entities; (3) reviewing the engagement and cooperation of foreign governments and foreign manufacturers in facilitating the inspection and certification, as appropriate, of such merchandise to be imported into the United States and the facilities producing such merchandise to ensure the safety of the merchandise and the expeditious entry of the merchandise into the United States; (4) identifying best practices, in consultation with private sector entities as appropriate, to assist United States importers in taking all appropriate steps to ensure the safety of merchandise imported into the United States, including with respect to— (A) the inspection of manufacturing facilities in foreign countries; (B) the inspection of merchandise destined for the United States before exportation from a foreign country or before distribution in the United States; and (C) the protection of the international supply chain (as defined in section 2 of the Security and Accountability For Every Port Act of 2006 ( 6 U.S.C. 901 (5) identifying best practices to assist Federal, State, and local governments and agencies, and port authorities, to improve communication and coordination among such agencies and authorities with respect to ensuring the safety of merchandise imported into the United States and the expeditious entry of such merchandise; and (6) otherwise identifying appropriate steps to increase the accountability of United States importers and the engagement of foreign government agencies with respect to ensuring the safety of merchandise imported into the United States and the expeditious entry of such merchandise. 202. Joint import safety rapid response plan (a) In general Not later than December 31, 2016, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the interagency Import Safety Working Group, shall develop a plan (to be known as the joint import safety rapid response plan (1) in taking action in response to, and coordinating Federal responses to, an incident in which cargo destined for or merchandise entering the United States has been identified as posing a threat to the health or safety of consumers in the United States; and (2) in recovering from or mitigating the effects of actions and responses to an incident described in paragraph (1). (b) Contents The joint import safety rapid response plan shall address— (1) the statutory and regulatory authorities and responsibilities of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and other Federal agencies in responding to an incident described in subsection (a)(1); (2) the protocols and practices to be used by U.S. Customs and Border Protection when taking action in response to, and coordinating Federal responses to, such an incident; (3) the measures to be taken by U.S. Customs and Border Protection and other Federal agencies in recovering from or mitigating the effects of actions taken in response to such an incident after the incident to ensure the resumption of the entry of merchandise into the United States; and (4) exercises that U.S. Customs and Border Protection may conduct in conjunction with Federal, State, and local agencies, and private sector entities, to simulate responses to such an incident. (c) Updates of plan The Secretary of Homeland Security shall review and update the joint import safety rapid response plan, as appropriate, after conducting exercises under subsection (d). (d) Import health and safety exercises (1) In general The Secretary of Homeland Security and the Commissioner shall periodically engage in the exercises referred to in subsection (b)(4), in conjunction with Federal, State, and local agencies and private sector entities, as appropriate, to test and evaluate the protocols and practices identified in the joint import safety rapid response plan at United States ports of entry. (2) Requirements for exercises In conducting exercises under paragraph (1), the Secretary and the Commissioner shall— (A) make allowance for the resources, needs, and constraints of United States ports of entry of different sizes in representative geographic locations across the United States; (B) base evaluations on current risk assessments of merchandise entering the United States at representative United States ports of entry located across the United States; (C) ensure that such exercises are conducted in a manner consistent with the National Incident Management System, the National Response Plan, the National Infrastructure Protection Plan, the National Preparedness Guidelines, the Maritime Transportation System Security Plan, and other such national initiatives of the Department of Homeland Security, as appropriate; and (D) develop metrics with respect to the resumption of the entry of merchandise into the United States after an incident described in subsection (a)(1). (3) Requirements for testing and evaluation The Secretary and the Commissioner shall ensure that the testing and evaluation carried out in conducting exercises under paragraph (1)— (A) are performed using clear and objective performance measures; and (B) result in the identification of specific recommendations or best practices for responding to an incident described in subsection (a)(1). (4) Dissemination of recommendations and best practices The Secretary and the Commissioner shall— (A) share the recommendations or best practices identified under paragraph (3)(B) among the members of the interagency Import Safety Working Group and with, as appropriate— (i) State, local, and tribal governments; (ii) foreign governments; and (iii) private sector entities; and (B) use such recommendations and best practices to update the joint import safety rapid response plan. 203. Training The Commissioner shall ensure that personnel of U.S. Customs and Border Protection assigned to United States ports of entry are trained to effectively administer the provisions of this title and to otherwise assist in ensuring the safety of merchandise imported into the United States and the expeditious entry of such merchandise. III Import-related protection of intellectual property rights 301. Definition of intellectual property rights In this title, the term intellectual property rights 302. Exchange of information related to trade enforcement (a) In general The Tariff Act of 1930 is amended by inserting after section 628 ( 19 U.S.C. 1628 628A. Exchange of information related to trade enforcement (a) In general Subject to subsections (c) and (d), if the Commissioner responsible for U.S. Customs and Border Protection suspects that merchandise is being imported into the United States in violation of section 526 of this Act or section 602, 1201(a)(2), or 1201(b)(1) of title 17, United States Code, and determines that the examination or testing of the merchandise by a person described in subsection (b) would assist the Commissioner in determining if the merchandise is being imported in violation of that section, the Commissioner, to permit the person to conduct the examination and testing— (1) shall provide to the person information that appears on the merchandise and its packaging and labels, including unredacted images of the merchandise and its packaging and labels; and (2) may, subject to any applicable bonding requirements, provide to the person unredacted samples of the merchandise. (b) Person described A person described in this subsection is— (1) in the case of merchandise suspected of being imported in violation of section 526, the owner of the trademark suspected of being copied or simulated by the merchandise; (2) in the case of merchandise suspected of being imported in violation of section 602 of title 17, United States Code, the owner of the copyright suspected of being infringed by the merchandise; (3) in the case of merchandise suspected of being primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under that title, and being imported in violation of section 1201(a)(2) of that title, the owner of a copyright in the work; and (4) in the case of merchandise suspected of being primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing protection afforded by a technological measure that effectively protects a right of an owner of a copyright in a work or a portion of a work, and being imported in violation of section 1201(b)(1) of that title, the owner of the copyright. (c) Limitation Subsection (a) applies only with respect to merchandise suspected of infringing a trademark or copyright that is recorded with U.S. Customs and Border Protection. (d) Exception The Commissioner may not provide under subsection (a) information, photographs, or samples to a person described in subsection (b) if providing such information, photographs, or samples would compromise an ongoing law enforcement investigation or national security. . (b) Termination of previous authority Notwithstanding paragraph (2) of section 818(g) of Public Law 112–81 303. Seizure of circumvention devices (a) In general Section 596(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1595a(c)(2) (1) in subparagraph (E), by striking or (2) in subparagraph (F), by striking the period and inserting ; or (3) by adding at the end the following: (G) U.S. Customs and Border Protection determines it is a technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof the importation of which is prohibited under subsection (a)(2) or (b)(1) of section 1201 of title 17, United States Code. . (b) Notification of persons injured (1) In general Not later than the date that is 30 business days after seizing merchandise pursuant to subparagraph (G) of section 596(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as added by subsection (a), the Commissioner shall provide to any person identified under paragraph (2) information regarding the merchandise seized that is equivalent to information provided to copyright owners under regulations of U.S. Customs and Border Protection for merchandise seized for violation of the copyright laws. (2) Persons to be provided information Any person injured by the violation of (a)(2) or (b)(1) of section 1201 of title 17, United States Code, that resulted in the seizure of the merchandise shall be provided information under paragraph (1), if that person is included on a list maintained by the Commissioner that is revised annually through publication in the Federal Register. (3) Regulations Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe regulations establishing procedures that implement this subsection. 304. Enforcement by U.S. Customs and Border Protection of works for which copyright registration is pending Not later than the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall authorize a process pursuant to which the Commissioner shall enforce a copyright for which the owner has submitted an application for registration under title 17, United States Code, with the United States Copyright Office, to the same extent and in the same manner as if the copyright were registered with the Copyright Office, including by sharing information, images, and samples of merchandise suspected of infringing the copyright under section 628A of the Tariff Act of 1930, as added by section 302. 305. National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center (a) Establishment The Secretary of Homeland Security shall— (1) establish within U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement a National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center; and (2) appoint an Assistant Director to head the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center. (b) Duties The Assistant Director of the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center shall— (1) coordinate the investigation of sources of merchandise that infringe intellectual property rights to identify organizations and individuals that produce, smuggle, or distribute such merchandise; (2) conduct and coordinate training with other domestic and international law enforcement agencies on investigative best practices— (A) to develop and expand the capability of such agencies to enforce intellectual property rights; and (B) to develop metrics to assess whether the training improved enforcement of intellectual property rights; (3) coordinate, with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, activities conducted by the United States to prevent the importation or exportation of merchandise that infringes intellectual property rights; (4) support the international interdiction of merchandise destined for the United States that infringes intellectual property rights; (5) collect and integrate information regarding infringement of intellectual property rights from domestic and international law enforcement agencies and other non-Federal sources; (6) develop a means to receive and organize information regarding infringement of intellectual property rights from such agencies and other sources; (7) disseminate information regarding infringement of intellectual property rights to other Federal agencies, as appropriate; (8) develop and implement risk-based alert systems, in coordination with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, to improve the targeting of persons that repeatedly infringe intellectual property rights; (9) coordinate with the offices of United States attorneys in order to develop expertise in, and assist with the investigation and prosecution of, crimes relating to the infringement of intellectual property rights; and (10) carry out such other duties as the Secretary of Homeland Security may assign. (c) Coordination with other agencies In carrying out the duties described in subsection (b), the Assistant Director of the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center shall coordinate with— (1) U.S. Customs and Border Protection; (2) the Food and Drug Administration; (3) the Department of Justice; (4) the Department of Commerce, including the United States Patent and Trademark Office; (5) the United States Postal Inspection Service; (6) the Office of the United States Trade Representative; (7) any Federal, State, local, or international law enforcement agencies that the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement considers appropriate; and (8) any other entities that the Director considers appropriate. (d) Private sector outreach (1) In general The Assistant Director of the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center shall work with U.S. Customs and Border Protection and other Federal agencies to conduct outreach to private sector entities in order to determine trends in and methods of infringing intellectual property rights. (2) Information sharing The Assistant Director shall share information and best practices with respect to the enforcement of intellectual property rights with private sector entities, as appropriate, in order to coordinate public and private sector efforts to combat the infringement of intellectual property rights. 306. Joint strategic plan for the enforcement of intellectual property rights The Commissioner and the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement shall include in the joint strategic plan required by section 105 of this Act— (1) a description of the efforts of the Department of Homeland Security to enforce intellectual property rights; (2) a list of the 10 United States ports of entry at which U.S. Customs and Border Protection has seized the most merchandise, both by volume and by value, that infringes intellectual property rights during the most recent 2-year period for which data are available; and (3) a recommendation for the optimal allocation of personnel, resources, and technology to ensure that U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement are adequately enforcing intellectual property rights. 307. Personnel dedicated to the enforcement of intellectual property rights (a) Personnel of U.S. customs and border protection The Commissioner and the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement shall ensure that sufficient personnel are assigned throughout U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, respectively, who have responsibility for preventing the importation into the United States of merchandise that infringes intellectual property rights. (b) Staffing of national intellectual property rights coordination center The Commissioner shall— (1) assign not fewer than 3 full-time employees of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center established under section 305 of this Act; and (2) ensure that sufficient personnel are assigned to United States ports of entry to carry out the directives of the Center. 308. Training with respect to the enforcement of intellectual property rights (a) Training The Commissioner shall ensure that officers of U.S. Customs and Border Protection are trained to effectively detect and identify merchandise destined for the United States that infringes intellectual property rights, including through the use of technologies identified under subsection (c). (b) Consultation with private sector The Commissioner shall consult with private sector entities to better identify opportunities for collaboration between U.S. Customs and Border Protection and such entities with respect to training for officers of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in enforcing intellectual property rights. (c) Identification of new technologies In consultation with private sector entities, the Commissioner shall identify— (1) technologies with the cost-effective capability to detect and identify merchandise at United States ports of entry that infringes intellectual property rights; and (2) cost-effective programs for training officers of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to use such technologies. (d) Donations of technology Not later than the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commissioner shall prescribe regulations to enable U.S. Customs and Border Protection to receive donations of hardware, software, equipment, and similar technologies, and to accept training and other support services, from private sector entities, for the purpose of enforcing intellectual property rights. 309. International cooperation and information sharing (a) Cooperation The Secretary of Homeland Security shall coordinate with the competent law enforcement and customs authorities of foreign countries, including by sharing information relevant to enforcement actions, to enhance the efforts of the United States and such authorities to enforce intellectual property rights. (b) Technical assistance The Secretary of Homeland Security shall provide technical assistance to competent law enforcement and customs authorities of foreign countries to enhance the ability of such authorities to enforce intellectual property rights. (c) Interagency collaboration The Commissioner and the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement shall lead interagency efforts to collaborate with law enforcement and customs authorities of foreign countries to enforce intellectual property rights. 310. Report on intellectual property rights enforcement Not later than June 30, 2016, and annually thereafter, the Commissioner and the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement shall jointly submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a report that contains the following: (1) With respect to the enforcement of intellectual property rights, the following: (A) The number of referrals from U.S. Customs and Border Protection to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement relating to infringement of intellectual property rights during the preceding year. (B) The number of investigations relating to the infringement of intellectual property rights referred by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to a United States attorney for prosecution and the United States attorneys to which those investigations were referred. (C) The number of such investigations accepted by each such United States attorney and the status or outcome of each such investigation. (D) The number of such investigations that resulted in the imposition of civil or criminal penalties. (E) A description of the efforts of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to improve the success rates of investigations and prosecutions relating to the infringement of intellectual property rights. (2) An estimate of the average time required by the Office of International Trade of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to respond to a request from port personnel for advice with respect to whether merchandise detained by U.S. Customs and Border Protection infringed intellectual property rights, distinguished by types of intellectual property rights infringed. (3) A summary of the outreach efforts of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement with respect to— (A) the interdiction and investigation of, and the sharing of information between those agencies and other Federal agencies to prevent the infringement of intellectual property rights; (B) collaboration with private sector entities— (i) to identify trends in the infringement of, and technologies that infringe, intellectual property rights; (ii) to identify opportunities for enhanced training of officers of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; and (iii) to develop best practices to enforce intellectual property rights; and (C) coordination with foreign governments and international organizations with respect to the enforcement of intellectual property rights. (4) A summary of the efforts of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to address the challenges with respect to the enforcement of intellectual property rights presented by Internet commerce and the transit of small packages and an identification of the volume, value, and type of merchandise seized for infringing intellectual property rights as a result of such efforts. (5) A summary of training relating to the enforcement of intellectual property rights conducted under section 308 of this Act and expenditures for such training. 311. Information for travelers regarding violations of intellectual property rights (a) In general The Secretary of Homeland Security shall develop and carry out an educational campaign to inform travelers entering or leaving the United States about the legal, economic, and public health and safety implications of acquiring merchandise that infringes intellectual property rights outside the United States and importing such merchandise into the United States in violation of United States law. (b) Declaration forms The Commissioner shall ensure that all versions of Declaration Form 6059B of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, or a successor form, including any electronic equivalent of Declaration Form 6059B or a successor form, printed or displayed on or after the date that is 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act include a written warning to inform travelers arriving in the United States that importation of merchandise into the United States that infringes intellectual property rights may subject travelers to civil or criminal penalties and may pose serious risks to safety or health. IV Evasion of antidumping and countervailing duty orders 401. Short title This title may be cited as the Enforcing Orders and Reducing Customs Evasion Act of 2015 402. Procedures for investigating claims of evasion of antidumping and countervailing duty orders (a) In general The Tariff Act of 1930 is amended by inserting after section 516A ( 19 U.S.C. 1516a 517. Procedures for investigating claims of evasion of antidumping and countervailing duty orders (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Administering authority The term administering authority (2) Commissioner The term Commissioner 6 U.S.C. 215 (3) Covered merchandise The term covered merchandise (A) an antidumping duty order issued under section 736; (B) a finding issued under the Antidumping Act, 1921; or (C) a countervailing duty order issued under section 706. (4) Enter; entry The terms enter entry (5) Evasion (A) In general Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the term evasion (B) Exception for clerical error (i) In general Except as provided in clause (ii), the term evasion (I) a document or electronically transmitted data or information, written or oral statement, or act that is false as a result of a clerical error; or (II) an omission that results from a clerical error. (ii) Patterns of negligent conduct If the Commissioner determines that a person has entered covered merchandise into the customs territory of the United States by means of a clerical error referred to in subclause (I) or (II) of clause (i) and that the clerical error is part of a pattern of negligent conduct on the part of that person, the Commissioner may determine, notwithstanding clause (i), that the person has entered such covered merchandise into the customs territory of the United States through evasion. (iii) Electronic repetition of errors For purposes of clause (ii), the mere nonintentional repetition by an electronic system of an initial clerical error does not constitute a pattern of negligent conduct. (iv) Rule of construction A determination by the Commissioner that a person has entered covered merchandise into the customs territory of the United States by means of a clerical error referred to in subclause (I) or (II) of clause (i) rather than through evasion shall not be construed to excuse that person from the payment of any duties applicable to the merchandise. (6) Interested party (A) In general The term interested party (i) a manufacturer, producer, or wholesaler in the United States of a domestic like product; (ii) a certified union or recognized union or group of workers that is representative of an industry engaged in the manufacture, production, or wholesale in the United States of a domestic like product; (iii) a trade or business association a majority of whose members manufacture, produce, or wholesale a domestic like product in the United States; (iv) an association, a majority of whose members is composed of interested parties described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) with respect to a domestic like product; and (v) if the covered merchandise is a processed agricultural product, as defined in section 771(4)(E), a coalition or trade association that is representative of either— (I) processors; (II) processors and producers; or (III) processors and growers, but this clause shall cease to have effect if the United States Trade Representative notifies the administering authority and the Commission that the application of this clause is inconsistent with the international obligations of the United States. (B) Domestic like product For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term domestic like product (b) Investigations (1) In general Not later than 10 business days after receiving an allegation described in paragraph (2) or a referral described in paragraph (3), the Commissioner shall initiate an investigation if the Commissioner determines that the information provided in the allegation or the referral, as the case may be, reasonably suggests that covered merchandise has been entered into the customs territory of the United States through evasion. (2) Allegation described An allegation described in this paragraph is an allegation that a person has entered covered merchandise into the customs territory of the United States through evasion that is— (A) filed with the Commissioner by an interested party; and (B) accompanied by information reasonably available to the party that filed the allegation. (3) Referral described A referral described in this paragraph is information submitted to the Commissioner by any other Federal agency, including the Department of Commerce or the United States International Trade Commission, that reasonably suggests that a person has entered covered merchandise into the customs territory of the United States through evasion. (4) Consolidation of allegations and referrals (A) In general The Commissioner may consolidate multiple allegations described in paragraph (2) and referrals described in paragraph (3) into a single investigation if the Commissioner determines it is appropriate to do so. (B) Effect on timing requirements If the Commissioner consolidates multiple allegations or referrals into a single investigation under subparagraph (A), the date on which the Commissioner receives the first such allegation or referral shall be used for purposes of the requirement under paragraph (1) with respect to the timing of the initiation of the investigation. (5) Information-sharing to protect health and safety If, during the course of conducting an investigation under paragraph (1) with respect to covered merchandise, the Commissioner has reason to suspect that such covered merchandise may pose a health or safety risk to consumers, the Commissioner shall provide, as appropriate, information to the appropriate Federal agencies for purposes of mitigating the risk. (6) Technical assistance and advice (A) In general Upon request, the Commissioner shall provide technical assistance and advice to eligible small businesses to enable such businesses to prepare and submit allegations described in paragraph (2), except that the Commissioner may deny assistance if the Commissioner concludes that the allegation, if submitted, would not lead to the initiation of an investigation under this subsection or any other action to address the allegation. (B) Eligible small business defined (i) In general In this paragraph, the term eligible small business (ii) Non-reviewability The determination of the Commissioner regarding whether a business concern is an eligible small business for purposes of this paragraph is not reviewable by any other agency or by any court. (c) Determinations (1) In general Not later than 270 calendar days after the date on which the Commissioner initiates an investigation under subsection (b) with respect to covered merchandise, the Commissioner shall make a determination, based on substantial evidence, with respect to whether such covered merchandise was entered into the customs territory of the United States through evasion. (2) Authority to collect and verify additional information In making a determination under paragraph (1) with respect to covered merchandise, the Commissioner may collect such additional information as is necessary to make the determination through such methods as the Commissioner considers appropriate, including by— (A) issuing a questionnaire with respect to such covered merchandise to— (i) an interested party that filed an allegation under paragraph (2) of subsection (b) that resulted in the initiation of an investigation under paragraph (1) of that subsection with respect to such covered merchandise; (ii) a person alleged to have entered such covered merchandise into the customs territory of the United States through evasion; (iii) a person that is a foreign producer or exporter of such covered merchandise; or (iv) the government of a country from which such covered merchandise was exported; and (B) conducting verifications, including on-site verifications, of any relevant information. (3) Adverse inference If the Commissioner finds that a party or person described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of paragraph (2)(A) has failed to cooperate by not acting to the best of the party or person’s ability to comply with a request for information, the Commissioner may, in making a determination under paragraph (1), use an inference that is adverse to the interests of that party or person in selecting from among the facts otherwise available to make the determination. (4) Notification Not later than 5 business days after making a determination under paragraph (1) with respect to covered merchandise, the Commissioner— (A) shall provide to each interested party that filed an allegation under paragraph (2) of subsection (b) that resulted in the initiation of an investigation under paragraph (1) of that subsection with respect to such covered merchandise a notification of the determination and may, in addition, include an explanation of the basis for the determination; and (B) may provide to importers, in such manner as the Commissioner determines appropriate, information discovered in the investigation that the Commissioner determines will help educate importers with respect to importing merchandise into the customs territory of the United States in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. (d) Effect of determinations (1) In general If the Commissioner makes a determination under subsection (c) that covered merchandise was entered into the customs territory of the United States through evasion, the Commissioner shall— (A) (i) suspend the liquidation of unliquidated entries of such covered merchandise that are subject to the determination and that enter on or after the date of the initiation of the investigation under subsection (b) with respect to such covered merchandise and on or before the date of the determination; or (ii) if the Commissioner has already suspended the liquidation of such entries pursuant to subsection (e)(1), continue to suspend the liquidation of such entries; (B) pursuant to the Commissioner’s authority under section 504(b)— (i) extend the period for liquidating unliquidated entries of such covered merchandise that are subject to the determination and that entered before the date of the initiation of the investigation; or (ii) if the Commissioner has already extended the period for liquidating such entries pursuant to subsection (e)(1), continue to extend the period for liquidating such entries; (C) notify the administering authority of the determination and request that the administering authority— (i) identify the applicable antidumping or countervailing duty assessment rates for entries described in subparagraphs (A) and (B); or (ii) if no such assessment rate for such an entry is available at the time, identify the applicable cash deposit rate to be applied to the entry, with the applicable antidumping or countervailing duty assessment rate to be provided as soon as that rate becomes available; (D) require the posting of cash deposits and assess duties on entries described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) in accordance with the instructions received from the administering authority under paragraph (2); and (E) take such additional enforcement measures as the Commissioner determines appropriate, such as— (i) initiating proceedings under section 592 or 596; (ii) implementing, in consultation with the relevant Federal agencies, rule sets or modifications to rules sets for identifying, particularly through the Automated Targeting System and the Automated Commercial Environment authorized under section 13031(f) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 ( 19 U.S.C. 58c(f) (iii) requiring, with respect to merchandise for which the importer has repeatedly provided incomplete or erroneous entry summary information in connection with determinations of evasion, the importer to deposit estimated duties at the time of entry; and (iv) referring the record in whole or in part to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for civil or criminal investigation. (2) Cooperation of administering authority (A) In general Upon receiving a notification from the Commissioner under paragraph (1)(C), the administering authority shall promptly provide to the Commissioner the applicable cash deposit rates and antidumping or countervailing duty assessment rates and any necessary liquidation instructions. (B) Special rule for cases in which the producer or exporter is unknown If the Commissioner and the administering authority are unable to determine the producer or exporter of the merchandise with respect to which a notification is made under paragraph (1)(C), the administering authority shall identify, as the applicable cash deposit rate or antidumping or countervailing duty assessment rate, the cash deposit or duty (as the case may be) in the highest amount applicable to any producer or exporter, including the all-others (e) Interim measures Not later than 90 calendar days after initiating an investigation under subsection (b) with respect to covered merchandise, the Commissioner shall decide based on the investigation if there is a reasonable suspicion that such covered merchandise was entered into the customs territory of the United States through evasion and, if the Commissioner decides there is such a reasonable suspicion, the Commissioner shall— (1) suspend the liquidation of each unliquidated entry of such covered merchandise that entered on or after the date of the initiation of the investigation; (2) pursuant to the Commissioner’s authority under section 504(b), extend the period for liquidating each unliquidated entry of such covered merchandise that entered before the date of the initiation of the investigation; and (3) pursuant to the Commissioner’s authority under section 623, take such additional measures as the Commissioner determines necessary to protect the revenue of the United States, including requiring a single transaction bond or additional security or the posting of a cash deposit with respect to such covered merchandise. (f) Administrative review (1) In general Not later than 30 business days after the Commissioner makes a determination under subsection (c) with respect to whether covered merchandise was entered into the customs territory of the United States through evasion, a person determined to have entered such covered merchandise through evasion or an interested party that filed an allegation under paragraph (2) of subsection (b) that resulted in the initiation of an investigation under paragraph (1) of that subsection with respect to such covered merchandise may file an appeal with the Commissioner for de novo review of the determination. (2) Timeline for review Not later than 60 business days after an appeal of a determination is filed under paragraph (1), the Commissioner shall complete the review of the determination. (g) Judicial review (1) In general Not later than 30 business days after the Commissioner completes a review under subsection (f) of a determination under subsection (c) with respect to whether covered merchandise was entered into the customs territory of the United States through evasion, a person determined to have entered such covered merchandise through evasion or an interested party that filed an allegation under paragraph (2) of subsection (b) that resulted in the initiation of an investigation under paragraph (1) of that subsection with respect to such covered merchandise may commence a civil action in the United States Court of International Trade by filing concurrently a summons and complaint contesting any factual findings or legal conclusions upon which the determination is based. (2) Standard of review In a civil action under this subsection, the court shall hold unlawful any determination, finding, or conclusion found to be arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law. (h) Rule of construction with respect to other civil and criminal proceedings and investigations No determination under subsection (c) or action taken by the Commissioner pursuant to this section shall be construed to limit the authority to carry out, or the scope of, any other proceeding or investigation pursuant to any other provision of Federal or State law, including sections 592 and 596. . (b) Conforming amendment Section 1581(c) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting or 517 516A (c) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (d) Regulations Not later than the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to implement the amendments made by this section. (e) Application to Canada and Mexico Pursuant to article 1902 of the North American Free Trade Agreement and section 408 of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act ( 19 U.S.C. 3438 403. Annual report on prevention and investigation of evasion of antidumping and countervailing duty orders (a) In general Not later than January 15 of each calendar year that begins on or after the date that is 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commissioner, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce and the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, shall submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a report on the efforts being taken to prevent and investigate the entry of covered merchandise into the customs territory of the United States through evasion. (b) Contents Each report required under subsection (a) shall include— (1) for the calendar year preceding the submission of the report— (A) a summary of the efforts of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to prevent and investigate the entry of covered merchandise into the customs territory of the United States through evasion; (B) the number of allegations of evasion received under subsection (b) of section 517 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as added by section 402 of this Act, and the number of such allegations resulting in investigations by U.S. Customs and Border Protection or any other agency; (C) a summary of investigations initiated under subsection (b) of such section 517, including— (i) the number and nature of the investigations initiated, conducted, and completed; and (ii) the resolution of each completed investigation; (D) the number of investigations initiated under that subsection not completed during the time provided for making determinations under subsection (c) of such section 517 and an explanation for why the investigations could not be completed on time; (E) the amount of additional duties that were determined to be owed as a result of such investigations, the amount of such duties that were collected, and, for any such duties not collected, a description of the reasons those duties were not collected; (F) with respect to each such investigation that led to the imposition of a penalty, the amount of the penalty; (G) an identification of the countries of origin of covered merchandise determined under subsection (c) of such section 517 to be entered into the customs territory of the United States through evasion; (H) the amount of antidumping and countervailing duties collected as a result of any investigations or other actions by U.S. Customs and Border Protection or any other agency; (I) a description of the allocation of personnel and other resources of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to prevent and investigate evasion, including any assessments conducted regarding the allocation of such personnel and resources; and (J) a description of training conducted to increase expertise and effectiveness in the prevention and investigation of evasion; and (2) a description of processes and procedures of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to prevent and investigate evasion, including— (A) the specific guidelines, policies, and practices used by U.S. Customs and Border Protection to ensure that allegations of evasion are promptly evaluated and acted upon in a timely manner; (B) an evaluation of the efficacy of those guidelines, policies, and practices; (C) an identification of any changes since the last report required by this section, if any, that have materially improved or reduced the effectiveness of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in preventing and investigating evasion; (D) a description of the development and implementation of policies for the application of single entry and continuous bonds for entries of covered merchandise to sufficiently protect the collection of antidumping and countervailing duties commensurate with the level of risk of not collecting those duties; (E) a description of the processes and procedures for increased cooperation and information sharing with the Department of Commerce, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and any other relevant Federal agencies to prevent and investigate evasion; and (F) an identification of any recommended policy changes for other Federal agencies or legislative changes to improve the effectiveness of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in preventing and investigating evasion. (c) Public summary The Commissioner shall make available to the public a summary of the report required by subsection (a) that includes, at a minimum— (1) a description of the type of merchandise with respect to which investigations were initiated under subsection (b) of section 517 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as added by section 402 of this Act; (2) the amount of additional duties determined to be owed as a result of such investigations and the amount of such duties that were collected; (3) an identification of the countries of origin of covered merchandise determined under subsection (c) of such section 517 to be entered into the customs territory of the United States through evasion; and (4) a description of the types of measures used by U.S. Customs and Border Protection to prevent and investigate evasion. (d) Definitions In this section, the terms covered merchandise evasion V Amendments to antidumping and countervailing duty laws 501. Consequences of failure to cooperate with a request for information in a proceeding Section 776 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1677e (1) in subsection (b)— (A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (4) as subparagraphs (A) through (D), respectively, and by moving such subparagraphs, as so redesignated, 2 ems to the right; (B) by striking Adverse Inferences Adverse Inferences (1) In general If ; (C) by striking under this title, may use (A) may use ; and (D) by striking facts otherwise available. Such adverse inference may include (B) is not required to determine, or make any adjustments to, a countervailable subsidy rate or weighted average dumping margin based on any assumptions about information the interested party would have provided if the interested party had complied with the request for information. (2) Potential sources of information for adverse inferences An adverse inference under paragraph (1)(A) may include ; (2) in subsection (c)— (A) by striking Corroboration of Secondary Information Corroboration of Secondary Information (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (2), when the ; and (B) by adding at the end the following: (2) Exception The administrative authority and the Commission shall not be required to corroborate any dumping margin or countervailing duty applied in a separate segment of the same proceeding. ; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (d) Subsidy rates and dumping margins in adverse inference determinations (1) In general If the administering authority uses an inference that is adverse to the interests of a party under subsection (b)(1)(A) in selecting among the facts otherwise available, the administering authority may— (A) in the case of a countervailing duty proceeding— (i) use a countervailable subsidy rate applied for the same or similar program in a countervailing duty proceeding involving the same country, or (ii) if there is no same or similar program, use a countervailable subsidy rate for a subsidy program from a proceeding that the administering authority considers reasonable to use, and (B) in the case of an antidumping duty proceeding, use any dumping margin from any segment of the proceeding under the applicable antidumping order. (2) Discretion to apply highest rate In carrying out paragraph (1), the administering authority may apply any of the countervailable subsidy rates or dumping margins specified under that paragraph, including the highest such rate or margin, based on the evaluation by the administering authority of the situation that resulted in the administering authority using an adverse inference in selecting among the facts otherwise available. (3) No obligation to make certain estimates or address certain claims If the administering authority uses an adverse inference under subsection (b)(1)(A) in selecting among the facts otherwise available, the administering authority is not required, for purposes of subsection (c) or for any other purpose— (A) to estimate what the countervailable subsidy rate or dumping margin would have been if the interested party found to have failed to cooperate under subsection (b)(1) had cooperated, or (B) to demonstrate that the countervailable subsidy rate or dumping margin used by the administering authority reflects an alleged commercial reality of the interested party. . 502. Definition of material injury (a) Effect of profitability of domestic industries Section 771(7) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1677(7) (J) Effect of profitability The Commission shall not determine that there is no material injury or threat of material injury to an industry in the United States merely because that industry is profitable or because the performance of that industry has recently improved. . (b) Evaluation of impact on domestic industry in determination of material injury Subclause (I) of section 771(7)(C)(iii) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1677(7)(C)(iii) (I) actual and potential decline in output, sales, market share, gross profits, operating profits, net profits, ability to service debt, productivity, return on investments, return on assets, and utilization of capacity, . (c) Captive production Section 771(7)(C)(iv) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1677(7)(C)(iv) (1) in subclause (I), by striking the comma and inserting , and (2) in subclause (II), by striking , and (3) by striking subclause (III). 503. Particular market situation (a) Definition of ordinary course of trade Section 771(15) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1677(15) (C) Situations in which the administering authority determines that the particular market situation prevents a proper comparison with the export price or constructed export price. . (b) Definition of normal value Section 773(a)(1)(B)(ii)(III) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1677b(a)(1)(B)(ii)(III) in such other country. (c) Definition of constructed value Section 773(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1677b(e) (1) in paragraph (1), by striking business trade (2) By striking the flush text at the end and inserting the following: For purposes of paragraph (1), if a particular market situation exists such that the cost of materials and fabrication or other processing of any kind does not accurately reflect the cost of production in the ordinary course of trade, the administering authority may use another calculation methodology under this subtitle or any other calculation methodology. For purposes of paragraph (1), the cost of materials shall be determined without regard to any internal tax in the exporting country imposed on such materials or their disposition that is remitted or refunded upon exportation of the subject merchandise produced from such materials. . 504. Distortion of prices or costs (a) Investigation of below-cost sales Section 773(b)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1677b(b)(2) (A) Reasonable grounds to believe or suspect (i) Review In a review conducted under section 751 involving a specific exporter, there are reasonable grounds to believe or suspect that sales of the foreign like product have been made at prices that are less than the cost of production of the product if the administering authority disregarded some or all of the exporter’s sales pursuant to paragraph (1) in the investigation or, if a review has been completed, in the most recently completed review. (ii) Requests for information In an investigation initiated under section 732 or a review conducted under section 751, the administering authority shall request information necessary to calculate the constructed value and cost of production under subsections (e) and (f) to determine whether there are reasonable grounds to believe or suspect that sales of the foreign like product have been made at prices that represent less than the cost of production of the product. . (b) Prices and costs in nonmarket economies Section 773(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1677b(c) (5) Discretion to disregard certain price or cost values In valuing the factors of production under paragraph (1) for the subject merchandise, the administering authority may disregard price or cost values without further investigation if the administering authority has determined that broadly available export subsidies existed or particular instances of subsidization occurred with respect to those price or cost values or if those price or cost values were subject to an antidumping order. . 505. Reduction in burden on Department of Commerce by reducing the number of voluntary respondents Section 782(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1677m(a) (1) in paragraph (1), by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively, and by moving such clauses, as so redesignated, 2 ems to the right; (2) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively, and by moving such subparagraphs, as so redesignated, 2 ems to the right; (3) by striking Investigations and Reviews Investigations and Reviews (1) In general In ; (4) in paragraph (1), as designated by paragraph (3), by amending subparagraph (B), as redesignated by paragraph (2), to read as follows: (B) the number of exporters or producers subject to the investigation or review is not so large that any additional individual examination of such exporters or producers would be unduly burdensome to the administering authority and inhibit the timely completion of the investigation or review. ; and (5) by adding at the end the following: (2) Determination of unduly burdensome In determining if an individual examination under paragraph (1)(B) would be unduly burdensome, the administering authority may consider the following: (A) The complexity of the issues or information presented in the proceeding, including questionnaires and any responses thereto. (B) Any prior experience of the administering authority in the same or similar proceeding. (C) The total number of investigations under subtitle A or B and reviews under section 751 being conducted by the administering authority as of the date of the determination. (D) Such other factors relating to the timely completion of each such investigation and review as the administering authority considers appropriate. . 506. Application to Canada and Mexico Pursuant to article 1902 of the North American Free Trade Agreement and section 408 of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act ( 19 U.S.C. 3438 VI Additional trade enforcement and intellectual property rights protection A Trade enforcement 601. Trade enforcement priorities (a) In general Section 310 of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2420 310. Trade enforcement priorities (a) Trade enforcement priorities, consultations, and report (1) Trade enforcement priorities consultations Not later than May 31 of each calendar year that begins after the date of the enactment of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 Trade Representative (2) Identification of trade enforcement priorities In identifying acts, policies, or practices of foreign governments as trade enforcement priorities under this subsection, the United States Trade Representative shall focus on those acts, policies, and practices the elimination of which is likely to have the most significant potential to increase United States economic growth, and take into account all relevant factors, including— (A) the economic significance of any potential inconsistency between an obligation assumed by a foreign government pursuant to a trade agreement to which both the foreign government and the United States are parties and the acts, policies, or practices of that government; (B) the impact of the acts, policies, or practices of a foreign government on maintaining and creating United States jobs and productive capacity; (C) the major barriers and trade distorting practices described in the most recent National Trade Estimate required under section 181(b); (D) the major barriers and trade distorting practices described in other relevant reports addressing international trade and investment barriers prepared by a Federal agency or congressional commission during the 12 months preceding the date of the most recent report under paragraph (3); (E) a foreign government's compliance with its obligations under any trade agreements to which both the foreign government and the United States are parties; (F) the implications of a foreign government’s procurement plans and policies; and (G) the international competitive position and export potential of United States products and services. (3) Report on trade enforcement priorities and actions taken to address (A) In general Not later than July 31 of each calendar year that begins after the date of the enactment of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (B) Report in subsequent years The Trade Representative shall include, when reporting under subparagraph (A) in any calendar year after the calendar year that begins after the date of the enactment of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (b) Semiannual enforcement consultations (1) In general At the same time as the reporting under subsection (a)(3), and not later than January 31 of each following year, the Trade Representative shall consult with the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives with respect to the identification, prioritization, investigation, and resolution of acts, policies, or practices of foreign governments of concern with respect to obligations under the WTO Agreements or any other trade agreement to which the United States is a party, or that otherwise create or maintain trade barriers. (2) Acts, policies, or practices of concern The semiannual enforcement consultations required by paragraph (1) shall address acts, policies, or practices of foreign governments that raise concerns with respect to obligations under the WTO Agreements or any other trade agreement to which the United States is a party, or otherwise create or maintain trade barriers, including— (A) engagement with relevant trading partners; (B) strategies for addressing such concerns; (C) availability and deployment of resources to be used in the investigation or resolution of such concerns; (D) the merits of any potential dispute resolution proceeding under the WTO Agreements or any other trade agreement to which the United States is a party relating to such concerns; and (E) any other aspects of such concerns. (3) Active investigations The semiannual enforcement consultations required by paragraph (1) shall address acts, policies, or practices that the Trade Representative is actively investigating with respect to obligations under the WTO Agreements or any other trade agreement to which the United States is a party, including— (A) strategies for addressing concerns raised by such acts, policies, or practices; (B) any relevant timeline with respect to investigation of such acts, policies, or practices; (C) the merits of any potential dispute resolution proceeding under the WTO Agreements or any other trade agreement to which the United States is a party with respect to such acts, policies, or practices; (D) barriers to the advancement of the investigation of such acts, policies, or practices; and (E) any other matters relating to the investigation of such acts, policies, or practices. (4) Ongoing enforcement actions The semiannual enforcement consultations required by paragraph (1) shall address all ongoing enforcement actions taken by or against the United States with respect to obligations under the WTO Agreements or any other trade agreement to which the United States is a party, including— (A) any relevant timeline with respect to such actions; (B) the merits of such actions; (C) any prospective implementation actions; (D) potential implications for any law or regulation of the United States; (E) potential implications for United States stakeholders, domestic competitors, and exporters; and (F) other issues relating to such actions. (5) Enforcement resources The semiannual enforcement consultations required by paragraph (1) shall address the availability and deployment of enforcement resources, resource constraints on monitoring and enforcement activities, and strategies to address those constraints, including the use of available resources of other Federal agencies to enhance monitoring and enforcement capabilities. (c) Investigation and resolution In the case of any acts, policies, or practices of a foreign government identified as a trade enforcement priority under subsection (a), the Trade Representative shall, not later than the date of the first semiannual enforcement consultations held under subsection (b) after the identification of the priority, take appropriate action to address that priority, including— (1) engagement with the foreign government to resolve concerns raised by such acts, policies, or practices; (2) initiation of an investigation under section 302(b)(1) with respect to such acts, policies, or practices; (3) initiation of negotiations for a bilateral agreement that provides for resolution of concerns raised by such acts, policies, or practices; or (4) initiation of dispute settlement proceedings under the WTO Agreements or any other trade agreement to which the United States is a party with respect to such acts, policies, or practices. (d) Enforcement notifications and consultation (1) Initiation of enforcement action The Trade Representative shall notify and consult with the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives in advance of initiation of any formal trade dispute by or against the United States taken in regard to an obligation under the WTO Agreements or any other trade agreement to which the United States is a party. With respect to a formal trade dispute against the United States, if advance notification and consultation are not possible, the Trade Representative shall notify and consult at the earliest practicable opportunity after initiation of the dispute. (2) Circulation of reports The Trade Representative shall notify and consult with the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives in advance of the announced or anticipated circulation of any report of a dispute settlement panel or the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization or of a dispute settlement panel under any other trade agreement to which the United States is a party with respect to a formal trade dispute by or against the United States. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) WTO The term WTO (2) WTO Agreement The term WTO Agreement 19 U.S.C. 3501(9) (3) WTO Agreements The term WTO Agreements . (b) Clerical amendment The table of contents for the Trade Act of 1974 is amended by striking the item relating to section 310 and inserting the following: Sec. 310. Trade enforcement priorities. . 602. Exercise of WTO authorization to suspend concessions or other obligations under trade agreements (a) In general Section 306 of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2416 (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following: (c) Exercise of WTO authorization to suspend concessions or other obligations If— (1) action has terminated pursuant to section 307(c), (2) the petitioner or any representative of the domestic industry that would benefit from reinstatement of action has submitted to the Trade Representative a written request for reinstatement of action, and (3) the Trade Representative has completed the requirements of subsection (d) and section 307(c)(3), the Trade Representative may at any time determine to take action under section 301(c) to exercise an authorization to suspend concessions or other obligations under Article 22 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (referred to in section 101(d)(16) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act ( 19 U.S.C. 3511(d)(16) . (b) Conforming amendments Chapter 1 of title III of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2411 et seq. (1) in section 301(c)(1) ( 19 U.S.C. 2411(c)(1) or section 306(c) subsection (a) or (b) (2) in section 306(b) ( 19 U.S.C. 2416(b) Further action Action on the basis of monitoring (3) in section 306(d) ( 19 U.S.C. 2416(d) or (c) subsection (b) (4) in section 307(c)(3) ( 19 U.S.C. 2417(c)(3) or if a request is submitted to the Trade Representative under 306(c)(2) to reinstate action, under section 301, 603. Trade monitoring (a) In general Chapter 1 of title II of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2251 et seq. 205. Trade monitoring (a) Monitoring tool for imports (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the United States International Trade Commission shall make available on a website of the Commission an import monitoring tool to allow the public access to data on the volume and value of goods imported into the United States for the purpose of assessing whether such data has changed with respect to such goods over a period of time. (2) Data described For purposes of the monitoring tool under paragraph (1), the Commission shall use data compiled by the Department of Commerce and such other government data as the Commission considers appropriate. (3) Periods of time The Commission shall ensure that data accessed through the monitoring tool under paragraph (1) includes data for the most recent quarter for which such data are available and previous quarters as the Commission considers practicable. (b) Monitoring reports (1) In general Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this section, and not less frequently than quarterly thereafter, the Secretary of Commerce shall publish on a website of the Department of Commerce, and notify the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives of the availability of, a monitoring report on changes in the volume and value of trade with respect to imports and exports of goods categorized based on the 6-digit subheading number of the goods under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States during the most recent quarter for which such data are available and previous quarters as the Secretary considers practicable. (2) Requests for comment Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary of Commerce shall solicit through the Federal Register public comment on the monitoring reports described in paragraph (1). (c) Sunset The requirements under this section terminate on the date that is 7 years after the date of the enactment of this section. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of contents for the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2101 et seq. Sec. 205. Trade monitoring. . 604. Establishment of Interagency Trade Enforcement Center (a) In general Chapter 4 of title I of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2171 142. Interagency Trade Enforcement Center (a) Establishment of Center There is established in the Office of the United States Trade Representative an Interagency Trade Enforcement Center (in this section referred to as the Center (b) Functions of Center (1) In general The Center shall— (A) serve as the primary forum within the Federal Government for the Office of the United States Trade Representative and other agencies to coordinate the enforcement of United States trade rights under international trade agreements and the enforcement of United States trade remedy laws; (B) coordinate among the Office of the United States Trade Representative and other agencies with responsibilities relating to trade the exchange of information related to potential violations of international trade agreements by foreign trading partners of the United States; and (C) conduct outreach to United States workers, businesses, and other interested persons to foster greater participation in the identification and reduction or elimination of foreign trade barriers and unfair foreign trade practices. (2) Coordination of trade enforcement (A) In general The Center shall coordinate matters relating to the enforcement of United States trade rights under international trade agreements and the enforcement of United States trade remedy laws among the Office of the United States Trade Representative and the following agencies: (i) The Department of State. (ii) The Department of the Treasury. (iii) The Department of Justice. (iv) The Department of Agriculture. (v) The Department of Commerce. (vi) The Department of Homeland Security. (vii) Such other agencies as the President, or the United States Trade Representative, may designate. (B) Consultations on intellectual property rights In matters relating to the enforcement of United States trade rights involving intellectual property rights, the Center shall consult with the Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator appointed pursuant to section 301 of the Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act of 2008 ( 15 U.S.C. 8111 (c) Personnel (1) Director The head of the Center shall be the Director, who shall— (A) be appointed by the United States Trade Representative from among full-time senior-level officials of the Office of the United States Trade Representative; and (B) report to the Trade Representative. (2) Deputy director There shall be in the Center a Deputy Director, who shall— (A) be appointed by the Secretary of Commerce from among full-time senior-level officials of the Department of Commerce and detailed to the Center; and (B) report directly to the Director. (3) Additional employees The agencies specified in subsection (b)(2)(A) may, in consultation with the Director, detail or assign their employees to the Center without reimbursement to support the functions of the Center. (d) Administration Funding and administrative support for the Center shall be provided by the Office of the United States Trade Representative. (e) Annual report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this section, and not less frequently than annually thereafter, the Director shall submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a report on the actions taken by the Center in the preceding year with respect to the enforcement of United States trade rights under international trade agreements and the enforcement of United States trade remedy laws. (f) Definitions In this section: (1) United States trade remedy laws The term United States trade remedy laws (A) Chapter 1 of title II of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2251 et seq. (B) Chapter 1 of title III of that Act ( 19 U.S.C. 2411 et seq. (C) Sections 406 and 421 of that Act (19 U.S.C. 2436 and 2451). (D) Sections 332 and 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1332 and 1337). (E) Investigations initiated by the administering authority (as defined in section 771 of that Act ( 19 U.S.C. 1677 19 U.S.C. 1671 et seq. (F) Section 281 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act ( 19 U.S.C. 3571 (2) United States trade rights The term United States trade rights . (b) Clerical amendment The table of contents for the Trade Act of 1974 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 141 the following: Sec. 142. Interagency Trade Enforcement Center. . 605. Establishment of Chief Manufacturing Negotiator (a) Establishment of position Section 141(b)(2) of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2171(b)(2) (2) There shall be in the Office 3 Deputy United States Trade Representatives, one Chief Agricultural Negotiator, and one Chief Manufacturing Negotiator, who shall all be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. As an exercise of the rulemaking power of the Senate, any nomination of a Deputy United States Trade Representative, the Chief Agricultural Negotiator, or the Chief Manufacturing Negotiator submitted to the Senate for its advice and consent, and referred to a committee, shall be referred to the Committee on Finance. Each Deputy United States Trade Representative, the Chief Agricultural Negotiator, and the Chief Manufacturing Negotiator shall hold office at the pleasure of the President and shall have the rank of Ambassador. . (b) Functions of position Section 141(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2171(c) (1) by moving paragraph (5) 2 ems to the left; and (2) by adding at the end the following: (6) (A) The principal function of the Chief Manufacturing Negotiator shall be to conduct trade negotiations and to enforce trade agreements relating to United States manufacturing products and services. The Chief Manufacturing Negotiator shall be a vigorous advocate on behalf of United States manufacturing interests and shall perform such other functions as the United States Trade Representative may direct. (B) Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 . (c) Compensation Section 5314 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking Chief Agricultural Negotiator. Chief Agricultural Negotiator, Office of the United States Trade Representative. Chief Manufacturing Negotiator, Office of the United States Trade Representative. . (d) Technical amendments Section 141(e) of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2171(e) (1) in paragraph (1), by striking 5314 5315 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the maximum rate of pay for grade GS–18, as provided in section 5332 the maximum rate of pay for level IV of the Executive Schedule in section 5315 606. Enforcement under title III of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to certain acts, policies, and practices relating to the environment Section 301(d)(3)(B) of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2411(d)(3)(B) (1) in clause (ii), by striking or (2) in clause (iii)(V), by striking the period at the end and inserting , or (3) by adding at the end the following: (iv) constitutes a persistent pattern of conduct by the government of the foreign country under which that government— (I) fails to effectively enforce the environmental laws of the foreign country, (II) waives or otherwise derogates from the environmental laws of the foreign country or weakens the protections afforded by such laws, (III) fails to provide for judicial or administrative proceedings giving access to remedies for violations of the environmental laws of the foreign country, (IV) fails to provide appropriate and effective sanctions or remedies for violations of the environmental laws of the foreign country, or (V) fails to effectively enforce environmental commitments under agreements to which the foreign country and the United States are a party. . 607. Trade Enforcement Trust Fund (a) Establishment There is established in the Treasury of the United States a trust fund to be known as the Trade Enforcement Trust Fund (in this section referred to as the Trust Fund (b) Transfer of amounts (1) In general The Secretary of the Treasury shall transfer to the Trust Fund, from the general fund of the Treasury, for each fiscal year that begins on or after the date of the enactment of this Act, an amount equal to $15,000,000 (or a lesser amount as required pursuant to paragraph (2)) of the antidumping duties and countervailing duties received in the Treasury for such fiscal year. (2) Limitation The total amount in the Trust Fund at any time may not exceed $30,000,000. (3) Frequency of transfers; adjustments (A) Frequency of transfers The Secretary shall transfer amounts required to be transferred to the Trust Fund under paragraph (1) not less frequently than quarterly from the general fund of the Treasury to the Trust Fund on the basis of estimates made by the Secretary. (B) Adjustments The Secretary shall make proper adjustments in amounts subsequently transferred to the Trust Fund to the extent prior estimates were in excess of or less than the amounts required to be transferred to the Trust Fund. (c) Investment of amounts (1) Investment of amounts The Secretary shall invest such portion of the Trust Fund as is not required to meet current withdrawals in interest-bearing obligations of the United States or in obligations guaranteed as to both principal and interest by the United States. (2) Interest and proceeds The interest on, and the proceeds from the sale or redemption of, any obligations held in Trust Fund shall be credited to and form a part of the Trust Fund. (d) Availability of amounts from trust fund (1) Enforcement The United States Trade Representative may use the amounts in the Trust fund to carry out any of the following: (A) To seek to enforce the provisions of and commitments and obligations under the WTO Agreements and free trade agreements to which the United States is a party and resolve any actions by foreign countries that are inconsistent with those provisions, commitments, and obligations. (B) To monitor the implementation by foreign countries of the provisions of and commitments and obligations under free trade agreements to which the United States is a party for purposes of systematically assessing, identifying, investigating, or initiating steps to address inconsistencies with those provisions, commitments, and obligations. (C) To thoroughly investigate and respond to petitions under section 302 of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2412 19 U.S.C. 2411 (2) Implementation assistance and capacity building The United States Trade Representative, the Secretary of State, the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, the Secretary of Labor, and such heads of other Federal agencies as the President considers appropriate may use the amounts in the Trust Fund to carry out any of the following: (A) To ensure capacity-building efforts undertaken by the United States pursuant to any free trade agreement to which the United States is a party prioritize and give special attention to the timely, consistent, and robust implementation of the intellectual property, labor, and environmental commitments and obligations of any party to that free trade agreement. (B) To ensure capacity-building efforts undertaken by the United States pursuant to any such free trade agreement are self-sustaining and promote local ownership. (C) To ensure capacity-building efforts undertaken by the United States pursuant to any such free trade agreement include performance indicators against which the progress and obstacles for the implementation of commitments and obligations described in subparagraph (A) can be identified and assessed within a meaningful time frame. (D) To monitor and evaluate the capacity-building efforts of the United States under subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C). (3) Limitation Amounts made available in the Trust Fund may not be used for negotiations for any free trade agreement to be entered into on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. (e) Report Not later than 18 months after the entry into force of any free trade agreement entered into after the date of the enactment of this Act, the United States Trade Representative, the Secretary of State, the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, the Secretary of Labor, and any other head of a Federal agency who has used amounts in the Trust Fund in connection with that agreement, shall each submit to Congress a report on the actions taken by that official under subsection (d) in connection with that agreement. (f) Comptroller General study (1) In general The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study that includes the following: (A) A comprehensive analysis of the trade enforcement expenditures of each Federal agency with responsibilities relating to trade that specifies, with respect to each such Federal agency— (i) the amounts appropriated for trade enforcement; and (ii) the number of full-time employees carrying out activities relating to trade enforcement. (B) Recommendations on the additional employees and resources that each such Federal agency may need to effectively enforce the free trade agreements to which the United States is a party. (2) Report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the study conducted under paragraph (1). (g) Definitions In this section: (1) Antidumping duty The term antidumping duty 19 U.S.C. 1673 (2) Countervailing duty The term countervailing duty 19 U.S.C. 1671 (3) WTO The term WTO (4) WTO Agreement The term WTO Agreement 19 U.S.C. 3501(9) (5) WTO agreements The term WTO Agreements 608. Honey transshipment (a) In general The Commissioner shall direct appropriate personnel and resources of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to address concerns that honey is being imported into the United States in violation of the customs and trade laws of the United States. (b) Country of origin (1) In general The Commissioner shall compile a database of the individual characteristics of honey produced in foreign countries to facilitate the verification of country of origin markings of imported honey. (2) Engagement with foreign governments The Commissioner shall seek to engage the customs agencies of foreign governments for assistance in compiling the database described in paragraph (1). (3) Consultation with industry In compiling the database described in paragraph (1), the Commissioner shall consult with entities in the honey industry regarding the development of industry standards for honey identification. (4) Consultation with food and drug administration In compiling the database described in paragraph (1), the Commissioner shall consult with the Commissioner of Food and Drugs. (c) Report required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commissioner shall submit to Congress a report that— (1) describes and assesses the limitations in the existing analysis capabilities of laboratories with respect to determining the country of origin of honey samples or the percentage of honey contained in a sample; and (2) includes any recommendations of the Commissioner for improving such capabilities. (d) Sense of congress It is the sense of Congress that the Commissioner of Food and Drugs should promptly establish a national standard of identity for honey for the Commissioner responsible for U.S. Customs and Border Protection to use to ensure that imports of honey are— (1) classified accurately for purposes of assessing duties; and (2) denied entry into the United States if such imports pose a threat to the health or safety of consumers in the United States. 609. Inclusion of interest in certain distributions of antidumping duties and countervailing duties (a) In general The Secretary of Homeland Security shall deposit all interest described in subsection (c) into the special account established under section 754(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1675c(e) Public Law 109–171 (b) Distributions described Distributions described in this subsection are distributions of antidumping duties and countervailing duties assessed on or after October 1, 2000, that are made under section 754 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1675c Public Law 109–171 (1) made on or before September 30, 2007; and (2) that were, in accordance with section 822 of the Claims Resolution Act of 2010 ( 19 U.S.C. 1675c (c) Interest described (1) Interest realized Interest described in this subsection is interest earned on antidumping duties or countervailing duties distributed as described in subsection (b) that is realized through application of a payment received on or after October 1, 2014, by U.S. Customs and Border Protection under, or in connection with— (A) a customs bond pursuant to a court order or judgment entered as a result of a civil action filed by the Federal Government against the surety from which the payment was obtained for the purpose of collecting duties or interest owed with respect to an entry; or (B) a settlement for any such bond if the settlement was executed after the Federal Government filed a civil action described in subparagraph (A). (2) Types of interest Interest described in paragraph (1) includes the following: (A) Interest accrued under section 778 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1677g (B) Interest accrued under section 505(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1505(d) (C) Equitable interest under common law or interest under section 963 of the Revised Statutes ( 19 U.S.C. 580 (d) Definitions In this section: (1) Antidumping duties The term antidumping duties 19 U.S.C. 1673 (2) Countervailing duties The term countervailing duties 19 U.S.C. 1671 610. Illicitly imported, exported, or trafficked cultural property, archaeological or ethnological materials, and fish, wildlife, and plants (a) In general The Commissioner and the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement shall ensure that appropriate personnel of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, as the case may be, are trained in the detection, identification, detention, seizure, and forfeiture of cultural property, archaeological or ethnological materials, and fish, wildlife, and plants, the importation, exportation, or trafficking of which violates the laws of the United States. (b) Training The Commissioner and the Director are authorized to accept training and other support services from experts outside of the Federal Government with respect to the detection, identification, detention, seizure, and forfeiture of cultural property, archaeological or ethnological materials, or fish, wildlife, and plants described in subsection (a). B Intellectual property rights protection 611. Establishment of Chief Innovation and Intellectual Property Negotiator (a) In general Section 141 of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2171 (1) in subsection (b)(2), as amended by section 605(a) of this Act— (A) by striking and one Chief Manufacturing Negotiator one Chief Manufacturing Negotiator, and one Chief Innovation and Intellectual Property Negotiator (B) by striking or the Chief Manufacturing Negotiator the Chief Manufacturing Negotiator, or the Chief Innovation and Intellectual Property Negotiator (C) by striking and the Chief Manufacturing Negotiator the Chief Manufacturing Negotiator, and the Chief Innovation and Intellectual Property Negotiator (2) in subsection (c), as amended by section 605(b) of this Act, by adding at the end the following: (7) The principal functions of the Chief Innovation and Intellectual Property Negotiator shall be to conduct trade negotiations and to enforce trade agreements relating to United States intellectual property and to take appropriate actions to address acts, policies, and practices of foreign governments that have a significant adverse impact on the value of United States innovation. The Chief Innovation and Intellectual Property Negotiator shall be a vigorous advocate on behalf of United States innovation and intellectual property interests. The Chief Innovation and Intellectual Property Negotiator shall perform such other functions as the United States Trade Representative may direct. . (b) Compensation Section 5314 of title 5, United States Code, as amended by section 605(c) of this Act, is further amended by inserting after Chief Manufacturing Negotiator, Office of the United States Trade Representative. Chief Innovation and Intellectual Property Negotiator, Office of the United States Trade Representative. . (c) Report required Not later than one year after the appointment of the first Chief Innovation and Intellectual Property Negotiator pursuant to paragraph (2) of section 141(b) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended by subsection (a), and annually thereafter, the United States Trade Representative shall submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a report describing in detail— (1) enforcement actions taken by the Trade Representative during the year preceding the submission of the report to ensure the protection of United States innovation and intellectual property interests; and (2) other actions taken by the Trade Representative to advance United States innovation and intellectual property interests. 612. Measures relating to countries that deny adequate protection for intellectual property rights (a) Inclusion of countries that deny adequate protection of trade secrets Section 182(d)(2) of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2242(d)(2) , trade secrets, copyrights (b) Special rules for countries on the priority watch list of the United States Trade Representative (1) In general Section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2242 (g) Special rules for foreign countries on the priority watch list (1) Action plans (A) In general Not later than 90 days after the date on which the Trade Representative submits the National Trade Estimate under section 181(b), the Trade Representative shall develop an action plan described in subparagraph (C) with respect to each foreign country described in subparagraph (B). (B) Foreign country described The Trade Representative shall develop an action plan pursuant to subparagraph (A) with respect to each foreign country that— (i) the Trade Representative has identified for placement on the priority watch list; and (ii) has remained on such list for at least 1 year. (C) Action plan described An action plan developed pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall contain the benchmarks described in subparagraph (D) and be designed to assist the foreign country— (i) to achieve— (I) adequate and effective protection of intellectual property rights; and (II) fair and equitable market access for United States persons that rely upon intellectual property protection; or (ii) to make significant progress toward achieving the goals described in clause (i). (D) Benchmarks described The benchmarks contained in an action plan developed pursuant to subparagraph (A) are such legislative, institutional, enforcement, or other actions as the Trade Representative determines to be necessary for the foreign country to achieve the goals described in clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph (C). (2) Failure to meet action plan benchmarks If, 1 year after the date on which an action plan is developed under paragraph (1)(A), the President, in consultation with the Trade Representative, determines that the foreign country to which the action plan applies has not substantially complied with the benchmarks described in paragraph (1)(D), the President may take appropriate action with respect to the foreign country. (3) Priority watch list defined In this subsection, the term priority watch list (h) Annual report Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Trade Representative submits the National Trade Estimate under section 181(b), the Trade Representative shall transmit to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate a report on actions taken under this section during the 12 months preceding such report, and the reasons for such actions, including— (1) any foreign countries identified under subsection (a); (2) a description of progress made in achieving improved intellectual property protection and market access for persons relying on intellectual property rights; and (3) a description of the action plans developed under subsection (g) and any actions taken by foreign countries under such plans. . (2) Authorization of appropriations (A) In general There are authorized to be appropriated to the Office of the United States Trade Representative such sums as may be necessary to provide assistance to any developing country to which an action plan applies under section 182(g) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended by paragraph (1), to facilitate the efforts of the developing country to comply with the benchmarks contained in the action plan. Such assistance may include capacity building, activities designed to increase awareness of intellectual property rights, and training for officials responsible for enforcing intellectual property rights in the developing country. (B) Developing country defined In this paragraph, the term developing country (3) Rule of construction Nothing in this subsection shall be construed as limiting the authority of the President or the United States Trade Representative to develop action plans other than action plans described in section 182(g) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended by paragraph (1), or to take any action otherwise authorized by law in response to the failure of a foreign country to provide adequate and effective protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights. VII Currency manipulation A Investigation of currency undervaluation 701. Short title This subtitle may be cited as the Currency Undervaluation Investigation Act 702. Investigation or review of currency undervaluation under countervailing duty law Subsection (c) of section 702 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1671a(c) (6) Currency undervaluation For purposes of a countervailing duty investigation under this subtitle in which the determinations under clauses (i) and (ii) of paragraph (1)(A) are affirmative, or a review under subtitle C with respect to a countervailing duty order, the administering authority shall initiate an investigation to determine whether currency undervaluation by the government of a country or any public entity within the territory of a country is providing, directly or indirectly, a countervailable subsidy, if— (A) a petition filed by an interested party (described in subparagraph (C), (D), (E), (F), or (G) of section 771(9)) alleges the elements necessary for the imposition of the duty imposed by section 701(a); and (B) the petition is accompanied by information reasonably available to the petitioner supporting those allegations. . 703. Benefit calculation methodology with respect to currency undervaluation Section 771 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1677 (37) Currency undervaluation benefit (A) Currency undervaluation benefit For purposes of a countervailing duty investigation under subtitle A, or a review under subtitle C with respect to a countervailing duty order, the following shall apply: (i) In general If the administering authority determines to investigate whether currency undervaluation provides a countervailable subsidy, the administering authority shall determine whether there is a benefit to the recipient of that subsidy and measure such benefit by comparing the simple average of the real exchange rates derived from application of the macroeconomic-balance approach and the equilibrium-real-exchange-rate approach to the official daily exchange rate identified by the administering authority. (ii) Reliance on data In making the determination under clause (i), the administering authority shall rely upon data that are publicly available, reliable, and compiled and maintained by the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank, or other international organizations or national governments if data from the International Monetary Fund or World Bank are not available. (B) Definitions In this paragraph: (i) Macroeconomic-balance approach The term macroeconomic-balance approach (ii) Equilibrium-real-exchange-rate approach The term equilibrium-real-exchange-rate approach (iii) Real exchange rates The term real exchange rates . 704. Modification of definition of specificity with respect to export subsidy Section 771(5A)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677(5A)(B)) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: The fact that a subsidy may also be provided in circumstances that do not involve export shall not, for that reason alone, mean that the subsidy cannot be considered contingent upon export performance. 705. Application to Canada and Mexico Pursuant to article 1902 of the North American Free Trade Agreement and section 408 of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act ( 19 U.S.C. 3438 706. Effective date The amendments made by this subtitle apply to countervailing duty investigations initiated under subtitle A of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1671 et seq. 19 U.S.C. 1675 et seq. (1) before the date of the enactment of this Act, if the investigation or review is pending a final determination as of such date of enactment; and (2) on or after such date of enactment. B Engagement on Currency Exchange Rate and Economic Policies 711. Enhancement of engagement on currency exchange rate and economic policies with certain major trading partners of the United States (a) Major trading partner report (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and not less frequently than once every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the macroeconomic and currency exchange rate policies of each country that is a major trading partner of the United States. (2) Elements (A) In general Each report submitted under paragraph (1) shall contain— (i) for each country that is a major trading partner of the United States— (I) that country’s bilateral trade balance with the United States; (II) that country’s current account balance as a percentage of its gross domestic product; (III) the change in that country’s current account balance as a percentage of its gross domestic product during the 3-year period preceding the submission of the report; (IV) that country’s foreign exchange reserves as a percentage of its short-term debt; and (V) that country’s foreign exchange reserves as a percentage of its gross domestic product; and (ii) an enhanced analysis of macroeconomic and exchange rate policies for each country— (I) that is a major trading partner of the United States; (II) the currency of which is persistently and substantially undervalued; (III) that has— (aa) a significant bilateral trade surplus with the United States; and (bb) a material global current account surplus; and (IV) that has engaged in persistent one-sided intervention in the foreign exchange market. (B) Enhanced analysis Each enhanced analysis under subparagraph (A)(ii) shall include, for each country with respect to which an analysis is made under that subparagraph— (i) a description of developments in the currency markets of that country, including, to the greatest extent feasible, developments with respect to currency interventions; (ii) a description of trends in the real effective exchange rate of the currency of that country and in the degree of undervaluation of that currency; (iii) an analysis of changes in the capital controls and trade restrictions of that country; and (iv) patterns in the reserve accumulation of that country. (b) Engagement on exchange rate and economic policies (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (2), the President, through the Secretary, shall commence enhanced bilateral engagement with each country for which an enhanced analysis of macroeconomic and currency exchange rate policies is included in the report submitted under subsection (a), in order to— (A) urge implementation of policies to address the causes of the undervaluation of its currency, its bilateral trade surplus with the United States, and its material global current account surplus, including undervaluation and surpluses relating to exchange rate management; (B) express the concern of the United States with respect to the adverse trade and economic effects of that undervaluation and those surpluses; (C) develop measureable objectives for addressing that undervaluation and those surpluses; and (D) advise that country of the ability of the President to take action under subsection (c). (2) Exception The Secretary may determine not to enhance bilateral engagement with a country under paragraph (1) for which an enhanced analysis of macroeconomic and exchange rate policies is included in the report submitted under subsection (a) if the Secretary submits to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that describes how the currency and other macroeconomic policies of that country are addressing the undervaluation and surpluses specified in paragraph (1)(A) with respect to that country, including undervaluation and surpluses relating to exchange rate management. (c) Remedial action (1) In general If, on the date that is one year after the commencement of enhanced bilateral engagement by the President with respect to a country under subsection (b)(1), the country has failed to adopt appropriate policies to correct the undervaluation and surpluses described in subsection (b)(1)(A) with respect to that country, the President may take one or more of the following actions: (A) Prohibit the Overseas Private Investment Corporation from approving any new financing (including any insurance, reinsurance, or guarantee) with respect to a project located in that country on and after such date. (B) Except as provided in paragraph (2), and pursuant to paragraph (3), prohibit the Federal Government from procuring, or entering into any contract for the procurement of, goods or services from that country on and after such date. (C) Instruct the United States Executive Director of the International Monetary Fund to use the voice and vote of the United States to call for additional rigorous surveillance of the macroeconomic and exchange rate policies of that country and, as appropriate, formal consultations on findings of currency manipulation. (D) Instruct the United States Trade Representative to take into account, in consultation with the Secretary, in assessing whether to enter into a bilateral or regional trade agreement with that country or to initiate or participate in negotiations with respect to a bilateral or regional trade agreement with that country, the extent to which that country has failed to adopt appropriate policies to correct the undervaluation and surpluses described in subsection (b)(1)(A). (2) Exception The President may not apply a prohibition under paragraph (1)(B) with respect to a country that is a party to the Agreement on Government Procurement or a free trade agreement to which the United States is a party. (3) Consultations (A) Office of Management and Budget Before applying a prohibition under paragraph (1)(B), the President shall consult with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to determine whether such prohibition would subject the taxpayers of the United States to unreasonable cost. (B) Congress The President shall consult with the appropriate committees of Congress with respect to any action the President takes under paragraph (1)(B), including whether the President has consulted as required under subparagraph (A). (d) Definitions In this section: (1) Agreement on Government Procurement The term Agreement on Government Procurement 19 U.S.C. 3511(d)(17) (2) Appropriate committees of Congress The term appropriate committees of Congress (A) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and the Committee on Finance of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Financial Services and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives. (3) Country The term country (4) Real effective exchange rate The term real effective exchange rate (5) Secretary The term Secretary 712. Advisory Committee on International Exchange Rate Policy (a) Establishment (1) In general There is established an Advisory Committee on International Exchange Rate Policy (in this section referred to as the Committee (2) Duties The Committee shall be responsible for advising the Secretary of the Treasury with respect to the impact of international exchange rates and financial policies on the economy of the United States. (b) Membership (1) In general The Committee shall be composed of 9 members as follows, none of whom shall be employees of the Federal Government: (A) Three members shall be appointed by the President pro tempore of the Senate, upon the recommendation of the chairmen and ranking members of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and the Committee on Finance of the Senate. (B) Three members shall be appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives upon the recommendation of the chairmen and ranking members of the Committee on Financial Services and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives. (C) Three members shall be appointed by the President. (2) Qualifications Members shall be selected under paragraph (1) on the basis of their objectivity and demonstrated expertise in finance, economics, or currency exchange. (3) Terms (A) In general Members shall be appointed for a term of 2 years or until the Committee terminates. (B) Reappointment A member may be reappointed to the Committee for additional terms. (4) Vacancies Any vacancy in the Committee shall not affect its powers, but shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment. (c) Duration of committee (1) In general The Committee shall terminate on the date that is 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act unless renewed by the President for a subsequent 2-year period. (2) Continued renewal The President may continue to renew the Committee for successive 2-year periods by taking appropriate action to renew the Committee prior to the date on which the Committee would otherwise terminate. (d) Meetings The Committee shall hold not less than 2 meetings each calendar year. (e) Chairperson (1) In general The Committee shall elect from among its members a chairperson for a term of 2 years or until the Committee terminates. (2) Reelection; subsequent terms A chairperson of the Committee may be reelected chairperson but is ineligible to serve consecutive terms as chairperson. (f) Staff The Secretary of the Treasury shall make available to the Committee such staff, information, personnel, administrative services, and assistance as the Committee may reasonably require to carry out the activities of the Committee. (g) Application of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (2), the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall apply to the Committee. (2) Exception Meetings of the Committee shall be exempt from the requirements of subsections (a) and (b) of section 10 and section 11 (A) would seriously compromise the development by the Government of the United States of monetary or financial policy; or (B) is likely to— (i) lead to significant financial speculation in currencies, securities, or commodities; or (ii) significantly endanger the stability of any financial institution. (h) Authorization of appropriations There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury for each fiscal year in which the Committee is in effect $1,000,000 to carry out this section. VIII Process for consideration of temporary duty suspensions and reductions 801. Short title This title may be cited as the American Manufacturing Competitiveness Act of 2015 802. Sense of Congress on the need for a miscellaneous tariff bill (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) As of the date of the enactment of this Act, the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States imposes duties on imported goods for which there is no domestic availability or insufficient domestic availability. (2) The imposition of duties on such goods creates artificial distortions in the economy of the United States that negatively affect United States manufacturers and consumers. (3) It is in the interests of the United States to update the Harmonized Tariff Schedule every 3 years to eliminate such artificial distortions by suspending or reducing duties on such goods. (4) The manufacturing competitiveness of the United States around the world will be enhanced if Congress regularly and predictably updates the Harmonized Tariff Schedule to suspend or reduce duties on such goods. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that, to remove the competitive disadvantage to United States manufactures and consumers resulting from an outdated Harmonized Tariff Schedule and to promote the competitiveness of United States manufacturers, Congress should consider a miscellaneous tariff bill not later than 180 days after the United States International Trade Commission and the Department of Commerce issue reports on proposed duty suspensions and reductions under this title. 803. Process for consideration of duty suspensions and reductions (a) Purpose It is the purpose of this section to establish a process by the appropriate congressional committees, in conjunction with the Commission pursuant to its authorities under section 332 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1332 (b) Establishment Not later than October 15, 2015, and October 15, 2018, the appropriate congressional committees shall establish and, on the same day, publish on their respective publicly available Internet websites a process— (1) to provide for the submission and consideration of legislation containing proposed duty suspensions and reductions in a manner that, to the maximum extent practicable, is consistent with the requirements described in subsection (c); and (2) to include in a miscellaneous tariff bill those duty suspensions and reductions that meet the requirements of this title. (c) Requirements of Commission (1) Initiation Not later than October 15, 2015, and October 15, 2018, the Commission shall publish in the Federal Register and on a publicly available Internet website of the Commission a notice requesting members of the public to submit to the Commission during the 60-day period beginning on the date of such publication— (A) proposed duty suspensions and reductions; and (B) Commission disclosure forms with respect to such duty suspensions and reductions. (2) Review (A) Commission submission to Congress As soon as practicable after the expiration of the 60-day period specified in paragraph (1), but not later than 15 days after the expiration of such 60-day period, the Commission shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees the proposed duty suspensions and reductions submitted under paragraph (1)(A) and the Commission disclosure forms with respect to such duty suspensions and reductions submitted under paragraph (1)(B). (B) Public availability of proposed duty suspensions and reductions Not later than 15 days after the expiration of the 60-day period specified in paragraph (1), the Commission shall publish on a publicly available Internet website of the Commission the proposed duty suspensions and reductions submitted under paragraph (1)(A) and the Commission disclosure forms with respect to such duty suspensions and reductions submitted under paragraph (1)(B). (C) Commission reports to Congress Not later than the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date of publication of the proposed duty suspensions and reductions under subparagraph (B), the Commission shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on each proposed duty suspension or reduction submitted pursuant to subsection (b)(1) or paragraph (1)(A) that contains the following information: (i) A determination of whether or not domestic production of the article that is the subject of the proposed duty suspension or reduction exists and, if such production exists, whether or not a domestic producer of the article objects to the proposed duty suspension or reduction. (ii) Any technical changes to the article description that are necessary for purposes of administration when articles are presented for importation. (iii) The amount of tariff revenue that would no longer be collected if the proposed duty suspension or reduction takes effect. (iv) A determination of whether or not the proposed duty suspension or reduction is available to any person that imports the article that is the subject of the proposed duty suspension or reduction. (3) Procedures The Commission shall prescribe and publish on a publicly available Internet website of the Commission procedures for complying with the requirements of this subsection. (4) Authorities described The Commission shall carry out this subsection pursuant to its authorities under section 332 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1332 (d) Department of Commerce report Not later than the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date of publication of the proposed duty suspensions and reductions under subsection (c)(2)(B), the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with U.S. Customs and Border Protection and other relevant Federal agencies, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on each proposed duty suspension and reduction submitted pursuant to subsection (b)(1) or (c)(1)(A) that includes the following information: (1) A determination of whether or not domestic production of the article that is the subject of the proposed duty suspension or reduction exists and, if such production exists, whether or not a domestic producer of the article objects to the proposed duty suspension or reduction. (2) Any technical changes to the article description that are necessary for purposes of administration when articles are presented for importation. (e) Rule of construction A proposed duty suspension or reduction submitted under this section by a Member of Congress shall receive treatment no more favorable than the treatment received by a proposed duty suspension or reduction submitted under this section by a member of the public. 804. Report on effects of duty suspensions and reductions on United States economy (a) In general Not later than May 1, 2018, and May 1, 2020, the Commission shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the effects on the United States economy of temporary duty suspensions and reductions enacted pursuant to this title, including a broad assessment of the economic effects of such duty suspensions and reductions on producers, purchasers, and consumers in the United States, using case studies describing such effects on selected industries or by type of article as available data permit. (b) Recommendations The Commission shall also solicit and append to the report required under subsection (a) recommendations with respect to those domestic industry sectors or specific domestic industries that might benefit from permanent duty suspensions and reductions or elimination of duties, either through a unilateral action of the United States or though negotiations for reciprocal tariff agreements, with a particular focus on inequities created by tariff inversions. (c) Form of report Each report required by this section shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 805. Judicial review precluded The exercise of functions under this title shall not be subject to judicial review. 806. Definitions In this title: (1) Appropriate congressional committees The term appropriate congressional committees (2) Commission The term Commission (3) Commission disclosure form The term Commission disclosure form (A) The contact information for any known importers of the article to which the proposed duty suspension or reduction would apply. (B) A certification by the member of the public that the proposed duty suspension or reduction is available to any person importing the article to which the proposed duty suspension or reduction would apply. (4) Domestic producer The term domestic producer (5) Duty suspension or reduction (A) In general The term duty suspension or reduction (i) (I) extends an existing temporary duty suspension or reduction of duty on an article under that subchapter; or (II) provides for a new temporary duty suspension or reduction of duty on an article under that subchapter; and (ii) otherwise meets the requirements described in subparagraph (B). (B) Requirements A duty suspension or reduction meets the requirements described in this subparagraph if— (i) the duty suspension or reduction can be administered by U.S. Customs and Border Protection; (ii) the estimated loss in revenue to the United States from the duty suspension or reduction does not exceed $500,000 in a calendar year during which the duty suspension or reduction would be in effect, as determined by the Congressional Budget Office; and (iii) the duty suspension or reduction is available to any person importing the article that is the subject of the duty suspension or reduction. (6) Member of Congress The term Member of Congress (7) Miscellaneous tariff bill The term miscellaneous tariff bill (A) duty suspensions and reductions that— (i) meet the applicable requirements for— (I) consideration of duty suspensions and reductions described in section 803; or (II) any other process required under the Rules of the House of Representatives or the Senate; and (ii) are not the subject of an objection because such duty suspensions and reductions do not comply with the requirements of this title from— (I) a Member of Congress; or (II) a domestic producer, as contained in comments submitted to the appropriate congressional committees, the Commission, or the Department of Commerce under section 803; and (B) provisions included in bills introduced in the House of Representatives or the Senate pursuant to a process described in subparagraph (A)(i)(II) that correct an error in the text or administration of a provision of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. IX Miscellaneous provisions 901. De minimis value (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) Modernizing international customs is critical for United States businesses of all sizes, consumers in the United States, and the economic growth of the United States. (2) Higher thresholds for the value of articles that may be entered informally and free of duty provide significant economic benefits to businesses and consumers in the United States and the economy of the United States through costs savings and reductions in trade transaction costs. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that the United States Trade Representative should encourage other countries, through bilateral, regional, and multilateral fora, to establish commercially meaningful de minimis values for express and postal shipments that are exempt from customs duties and taxes and from certain entry documentation requirements, as appropriate. (c) De minimis value Section 321(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) $200 $800 (d) Effective date The amendment made by subsection (c) shall apply with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 902. Consultation on trade and customs revenue functions Section 401(c) of the Safety and Accountability for Every Port Act ( 6 U.S.C. 115(c) (1) in paragraph (1), by striking on Department policies and actions that have not later than 30 days after proposing, and not later than 30 days before finalizing, any Department policies, initiatives, or actions that will have (2) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking not later than 30 days prior to the finalization of not later than 60 days before proposing, and not later than 60 days before finalizing, 903. Penalties for customs brokers (a) In general Section 641(d)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1641(d)(1) (1) in subparagraph (E), by striking ; or (2) in subparagraph (F), by striking the period and inserting ; or (3) by adding at the end the following: (G) has been convicted of committing or conspiring to commit an act of terrorism described in section 2332b of title 18, United States Code. . (b) Technical amendments Section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1641 (1) by striking the Customs Service U.S. Customs and Border Protection (2) in subsection (d)(2)(B), by striking The Customs Service U.S. Customs and Border Protection (3) in subsection (g)(2)(B), by striking Secretary’s notice notice under subparagraph (A) 904. Amendments to chapter 98 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (a) Articles exported and returned, advanced or improved abroad (1) In general U.S. Note 3 to subchapter II of chapter 98 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by adding at the end the following: (f) (1) For purposes of subheadings 9802.00.40 and 9802.00.50, fungible articles exported from the United States for the purposes described in such subheadings— (A) may be commingled; and (B) the origin, value, and classification of such articles may be accounted for using an inventory management method. (2) If a person chooses to use an inventory management method under this paragraph with respect to fungible articles, the person shall use the same inventory management method for any other articles with respect to which the person claims fungibility under this paragraph. (3) For the purposes of this paragraph— (A) the term fungible articles (B) the term inventory management method . (2) Effective date The amendment made by this subsection applies to articles classifiable under subheading 9802.00.40 or 9802.00.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the date that is 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (b) Modification of provisions relating to returned property (1) In general The article description for heading 9801.00.10 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting after exported , or any other products when returned within 3 years after having been exported (2) Effective date The amendment made by paragraph (1) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the date that is 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (c) Duty-free treatment for certain United States Government property returned to the United States (1) In general Subchapter I of chapter 98 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following new heading: 9801.00.11 United States Government property, returned to the United States without having been advanced in value or improved in condition by any means while abroad, entered by the United States Government or a contractor to the United States Government, and certified by the importer as United States Government property Free . (2) Effective date The amendment made by paragraph (1) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the date that is 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 905. Exemption from duty of residue of bulk cargo contained in instruments of international traffic previously exported from the United States (a) In general General Note 3(e) of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended— (1) in subparagraph (v), by striking and (2) in subparagraph (vi), by adding and (3) by inserting after subparagraph (vi) (as so amended) the following new subparagraph: (vii) residue of bulk cargo contained in instruments of international traffic previously exported from the United States, ; and (4) by adding at the end of the flush text following subparagraph (vii) (as so added) the following: For purposes of subparagraph (vii) of this paragraph: The term residue bulk cargo instruments of international traffic (b) Effective date The amendments made by subsection (a) take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and apply with respect to residue of bulk cargo contained in instruments of international traffic that are imported into the customs territory of the United States on or after such date of enactment and that previously have been exported from the United States. 906. Drawback and refunds (a) Articles made from imported merchandise Section 313(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) the full amount of the duties paid upon the merchandise so used shall be refunded as drawback, less 1 per centum of such duties, except that such an amount calculated pursuant to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury under subsection (l) shall be refunded as drawback, except that (b) Substitution for drawback purposes Section 313(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1313(b) (1) by striking If imported (1) In general If imported ; (2) by striking and any other merchandise (whether imported or domestic) of the same kind and quality are or merchandise classifiable under the same 8-digit HTS subheading number as such imported merchandise is (3) by striking three years 5 years (4) by striking the receipt of such imported merchandise by the manufacturer or producer of such articles the date of importation of such imported merchandise (5) by inserting or articles classifiable under the same 8-digit HTS subheading number as such articles, any such articles, (6) by striking an amount of drawback equal to an amount calculated pursuant to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury under subsection (l), but only if those articles have not been used prior to such exportation or destruction. (7) by adding at the end the following: (2) Requirements relating to transfer of merchandise (A) Manufacturers and producers Drawback shall be allowed under paragraph (1) with respect to an article manufactured or produced using imported merchandise or other merchandise classifiable under the same 8-digit HTS subheading number as such imported merchandise only if the manufacturer or producer of the article received such imported merchandise or such other merchandise, directly or indirectly, from the importer. (B) Exporters and destroyers Drawback shall be allowed under paragraph (1) with respect to a manufactured or produced article that is exported or destroyed only if the exporter or destroyer received that article or an article classifiable under the same 8-digit HTS subheading number as that article, directly or indirectly, from the manufacturer or producer. (C) Evidence of transfer Transfers of merchandise under subparagraph (A) and transfers of articles under subparagraph (B) may be evidenced by business records kept in the normal course of business and no additional certificates of transfer or manufacture shall be required. (3) Submission of bill of materials or formula (A) In general Drawback shall be allowed under paragraph (1) with respect to an article manufactured or produced using imported merchandise or other merchandise classifiable under the same 8-digit HTS subheading number as such imported merchandise only if the person making the drawback claim submits with the claim a bill of materials or formula identifying the merchandise and article by the 8-digit HTS subheading number and the quantity of the merchandise. (B) Bill of materials and formula defined In this paragraph, the terms bill of materials formula (4) Special rule for sought chemical elements (A) In general For purposes of paragraph (1), a sought chemical element may be— (i) considered imported merchandise, or merchandise classifiable under the same 8-digit HTS subheading number as such imported merchandise, used in the manufacture or production of an article as described in paragraph (1); and (ii) substituted for source material containing that sought chemical element, without regard to whether the sought chemical element and the source material are classifiable under the same 8-digit HTS subheading number, and apportioned quantitatively, as appropriate. (B) Sought chemical element defined In this paragraph, the term sought chemical element . (c) Merchandise not conforming to sample or specifications Section 313(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1313(c) (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by striking under a certificate of delivery (B) in subparagraph (D)— (i) by striking 3 5 (ii) by striking the Customs Service U.S. Customs and Border Protection (C) in the flush text at the end, by striking the full amount of the duties paid upon such merchandise, less 1 percent, an amount calculated pursuant to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury under subsection (l) (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the Customs Service U.S. Customs and Border Protection (3) by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows: (3) Evidence of transfers Transfers of merchandise under paragraph (1) may be evidenced by business records kept in the normal course of business and no additional certificates of transfer shall be required. . (d) Proof of exportation Section 313(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1313(i) (i) Proof of exportation A person claiming drawback under this section based on the exportation of an article shall provide proof of the exportation of the article. Such proof of exportation— (1) shall establish fully the date and fact of exportation and the identity of the exporter; and (2) may be established through the use of records kept in the normal course of business or through an electronic export system of the United States Government, as determined by the Commissioner responsible for U.S. Customs and Border Protection. . (e) Unused merchandise drawback Section 313(j) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1313(j) (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) in subparagraph (A), in the matter preceding clause (i)— (i) by striking 3-year 5-year (ii) by inserting and before the drawback claim is filed the date of importation (B) in the flush text at the end, by striking 99 percent of the amount of each duty, tax, or fee so paid an amount calculated pursuant to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury under subsection (l) (2) in paragraph (2)— (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking paragraph (4) paragraphs (4), (5), and (6) (B) in subparagraph (A), by striking commercially interchangeable with classifiable under the same 8-digit HTS subheading number as (C) in subparagraph (B)— (i) by striking 3-year 5-year (ii) by inserting and before the drawback claim is filed the imported merchandise (D) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by striking subclause (II) and inserting the following: (II) received the imported merchandise, other merchandise classifiable under the same 8-digit HTS subheading number as such imported merchandise, or any combination of such imported merchandise and such other merchandise, directly or indirectly from the person who imported and paid any duties, taxes, and fees imposed under Federal law upon importation or entry and due on the imported merchandise (and any such transferred merchandise, regardless of its origin, will be treated as the imported merchandise and any retained merchandise will be treated as domestic merchandise); ; and (E) in the flush text at the end— (i) by striking the amount of each such duty, tax, and fee 99 percent of that duty, tax, or fee an amount calculated pursuant to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury under subsection (l) shall be refunded as drawback (ii) by striking the last sentence and inserting the following: Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), drawback shall be allowed under this paragraph with respect to wine if the imported wine and the exported wine are of the same color and the price variation between the imported wine and the exported wine does not exceed 50 percent. Transfers of merchandise may be evidenced by business records kept in the normal course of business and no additional certificates of transfer shall be required. (3) in paragraph (3)(B), by striking the commercially interchangeable merchandise merchandise classifiable under the same 8-digit HTS subheading number as such imported merchandise (4) by adding at the end the following: (5) (A) For purposes of paragraph (2) and except as provided in subparagraph (B), merchandise may not be substituted for imported merchandise for drawback purposes based on the 8-digit HTS subheading number if the article description for the 8-digit HTS subheading number under which the imported merchandise is classified begins with the term other (B) In cases described in subparagraph (A), merchandise may be substituted for imported merchandise for drawback purposes if— (i) the other merchandise and such imported merchandise are classifiable under the same 10-digit HTS statistical reporting number; and (ii) the article description for that 10-digit HTS statistical reporting number does not begin with the term other (6) (A) For purposes of paragraph (2), a drawback claimant may use the first 8 digits of the 10-digit Schedule B number for merchandise or an article to determine if the merchandise or article is classifiable under the same 8-digit HTS subheading number as the imported merchandise, without regard to whether the Schedule B number corresponds to more than one 8-digit HTS subheading number. (B) In this paragraph, the term Schedule B . (f) Liability for drawback claims Section 313(k) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1313(k) (k) Liability for drawback claims (1) In general Any person making a claim for drawback under this section shall be liable for the full amount of the drawback claimed. (2) Liability of importers An importer shall be liable for any drawback claim made by another person with respect to merchandise imported by the importer in an amount equal to the lesser of— (A) the amount of duties, taxes, and fees that the person claimed with respect to the imported merchandise; or (B) the amount of duties, taxes, and fees that the importer authorized the other person to claim with respect to the imported merchandise. (3) Joint and several liability Persons described in paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be jointly and severally liable for the amount described in paragraph (2). . (g) Regulations Section 313(l) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1313(l) (l) Regulations (1) In general Allowance of the privileges provided for in this section shall be subject to compliance with such rules and regulations as the Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe. (2) Calculation of drawback (A) In general Not later than the date that is 2 years after the date of the enactment of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (B) Requirements The regulations required by subparagraph (A) for determining the calculation of amounts refunded as drawback under this section shall provide for a refund of 99 percent of the duties, taxes, and fees paid with respect to the imported merchandise, except that where there is substitution of the merchandise or article, then— (i) in the case of an article that is exported, the amount of the refund shall be equal to 99 percent of the lesser of— (I) the amount of duties, taxes, and fees paid with respect to the imported merchandise; or (II) the amount of duties, taxes, and fees that would apply to the exported article if the exported article were imported; and (ii) in the case of an article that is destroyed, the amount of the refund shall be an amount that is— (I) equal to 99 percent of the lesser of— (aa) the amount of duties, taxes, and fees paid with respect to the imported merchandise; and (bb) the amount of duties, taxes, and fees that would apply to the destroyed article if the destroyed article were imported; and (II) reduced by the value of materials recovered during destruction as provided in subsection (x). (3) Status reports on regulations Not later than the date that is one year after the date of the enactment of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 . (h) Substitution of finished petroleum derivatives Section 313(p) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1313(p) (1) by striking Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States HTS (2) in paragraph (3)(A)— (A) in clause (ii)(III), by striking , as so certified in a certificate of delivery or certificate of manufacture and delivery (B) in the flush text at the end— (i) by striking , as so designated on the certificate of delivery or certificate of manufacture and delivery (ii) by striking the last sentence and inserting the following: The party transferring the merchandise shall maintain records kept in the normal course of business to demonstrate the transfer. (i) Packaging material Section 313(q) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1313(q) (1) in paragraph (1), by striking of 99 percent of any duty, tax, or fee imposed under Federal law on such imported material in an amount calculated pursuant to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury under subsection (l) (2) in paragraph (2), by striking of 99 percent of any duty, tax, or fee imposed under Federal law on the imported or substituted merchandise used to manufacture or produce such material in an amount calculated pursuant to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury under subsection (l) (3) in paragraph (3), by striking they contain it contains (j) Filing of drawback claims Section 313(r) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1313(r) (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) by striking the first sentence and inserting the following: A drawback entry shall be filed or applied for, as applicable, not later than 5 years after the date on which merchandise on which drawback is claimed was imported. (B) in the second sentence, by striking 3-year 5-year (C) in the third sentence, by striking the Customs Service U.S. Customs and Border Protection (2) in paragraph (3)— (A) in subparagraph (A)— (i) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking The Customs Service U.S. Customs and Border Protection (ii) in clauses (i) and (ii), by striking the Customs Service U.S. Customs and Border Protection (iii) in clause (ii)(I), by striking 3-year 5-year (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the periods of time for retaining records set forth in subsection (t) of this section and the period of time for retaining records set forth in (3) by adding at the end the following: (4) All drawback claims filed on and after the date that is 2 years after the date of the enactment of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 . (k) Designation of merchandise by successor Section 313(s) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1313(s) (1) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following: (B) subject to paragraphs (5) and (6) of subsection (j), imported merchandise, other merchandise classifiable under the same 8-digit HTS subheading number as such imported merchandise, or any combination of such imported merchandise and such other merchandise, that the predecessor received, before the date of succession, from the person who imported and paid any duties, taxes, and fees due on the imported merchandise; ; and (2) in paragraph (4), by striking certifies that certifies that the transferred merchandise was not and will not be claimed by the predecessor. (l) Drawback certificates Section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1313 (m) Drawback for recovered materials Section 313(x) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1313(x) and (c) (c), and (j) (n) Definitions Section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1313 (z) Definitions In this section: (1) Directly The term directly (2) HTS The term HTS (3) Indirectly The term indirectly . (o) Recordkeeping Section 508(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1508(c)(3) (1) by striking 3rd 5th (2) by striking payment liquidation (p) Government Accountability Office report (1) In general Not later than one year after the issuance of the regulations required by subsection (l)(2) of section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as added by subsection (g), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a report on the modernization of drawback and refunds under section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by this section. (2) Contents The report required by paragraph (1) include the following: (A) An assessment of the modernization of drawback and refunds under section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by this section. (B) A description of drawback claims that were permissible before the effective date provided for in subsection (q) that are not permissible after that effective date and an identification of industries most affected. (C) A description of drawback claims that were not permissible before the effective date provided for in subsection (q) that are permissible after that effective date and an identification of industries most affected. (q) Effective date (1) In general The amendments made by this section shall— (A) take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act; and (B) except as provided in paragraphs (2)(B) and (3), apply to drawback claims filed on or after the date that is 2 years after such date of enactment. (2) Reporting of operability of Automated Commercial Environment computer system (A) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and not later than 2 years after such date of enactment, the Secretary of the Treasury shall submit to Congress a report on— (i) the date on which the Automated Commercial Environment will be ready to process drawback claims; and (ii) the date on which the Automated Export System will be ready to accept proof of exportation under subsection (i) of section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by subsection (d). (B) Delay of effective date If the Secretary indicates in the report required by subparagraph (A) that the Automated Commercial Environment will not be ready to process drawback claims by the date that is 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the amendments made by this section shall apply to drawback claims filed on and after the date on which the Secretary certifies that the Automated Commercial Environment is ready to process drawback claims. (3) Transition rule During the one-year period beginning on the date that is 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act (or, if later, the effective date provided for in paragraph (2)(B)), a person may elect to file a claim for drawback under— (A) section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by this section; or (B) section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act. 907. Inclusion of certain information in submission of nomination for appointment as Deputy United States Trade Representative Section 141(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2171(b) (5) When the President submits to the Senate for its advice and consent a nomination of an individual for appointment as a Deputy United States Trade Representative under paragraph (2), the President shall include in that submission information on the country, regional offices, and functions of the Office of the United States Trade Representative with respect to which that individual will have responsibility. . 908. Biennial reports regarding competitiveness issues facing the United States economy and competitive conditions for certain key United States industries (a) In general The United States International Trade Commission shall conduct a series of investigations, and submit a report on each such investigation in accordance with subsection (c), regarding competitiveness issues facing the economy of the United States and competitive conditions for certain key United States industries. (b) Contents of report (1) In general Each report required by subsection (a) shall include, to the extent practicable, the following: (A) A detailed assessment of competitiveness issues facing the economy of the United States, over the 10-year period beginning on the date on which the report is submitted, that includes— (i) projections, over that 10-year period, of economic measures, such as measures relating to production in the United States and United States trade, for the economy of the United States and for key United States industries, based on ongoing trends in the economy of the United States and global economies and incorporating estimates from prominent United States, foreign, multinational, and private sector organizations; and (ii) a description of factors that drive economic growth, such as domestic productivity, the United States workforce, foreign demand for United States goods and services, and industry-specific developments. (B) A detailed assessment of a key United States industry or key United States industries that, to the extent practicable— (i) identifies with respect to each such industry the principal factors driving competitiveness as of the date on which the report is submitted; and (ii) describes, with respect to each such industry, the structure of the global industry, its market characteristics, current industry trends, relevant policies and programs of foreign governments, and principal factors affecting future competitiveness. (2) Selection of key United States industries (A) In general In conducting assessments required under paragraph (1)(B), the Commission shall, to the extent practicable, select a different key United States industry or different key United States industries for purposes of each report required by subsection (a). (B) Consultations with Congress The Commission shall consult with the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives before selecting the key United States industry or key United States industries for purposes of each report required by subsection (a). (c) Submission of reports (1) In general Not later than May 15, 2017, and every 2 years thereafter through 2025, the Commission shall submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a report on the most recent investigation conducted under subsection (a). (2) Extension of deadline The Commission may, after consultation with the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, submit a report under paragraph (1) later than the date required by that paragraph. (3) Confidential business information A report submitted under paragraph (1) shall not include any confidential business information unless— (A) the party that submitted the confidential business information to the Commission had notice, at the time of submission, that the information would be released by the Commission; or (B) that party consents to the release of the information. (d) Key United States industry defined In this section, the term key United States industry (1) contributes significantly to United States economic activity and trade; or (2) is a potential growth area for the United States and global markets. 909. Report on certain U.S. Customs and Border Protection agreements (a) In general Not later than one year after entering into an agreement under a program specified in subsection (b), and annually thereafter until the termination of the program, the Commissioner shall submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a report that includes the following: (1) A description of the development of the program. (2) A description of the type of entity with which U.S. Customs and Border Protection entered into the agreement and the amount that entity reimbursed U.S. Customs and Border Protection under the agreement. (3) An identification of the type of port of entry to which the agreement relates and an assessment of how the agreement provides economic benefits at the port of entry. (4) A description of the services provided by U.S. Customs and Border Protection under the agreement during the year preceding the submission of the report. (5) The amount of fees collected under the agreement during that year. (6) A detailed accounting of how the fees collected under the agreement have been spent during that year. (7) A summary of any complaints or criticism received by U.S. Customs and Border Protection during that year regarding the agreement. (8) An assessment of the compliance of the entity described in paragraph (2) with the terms of the agreement. (9) Recommendations with respect to how activities conducted pursuant to the agreement could function more effectively or better produce economic benefits. (10) A summary of the benefits to and challenges faced by U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the entity described in paragraph (2) under the agreement. (b) Program specified A program specified in this subsection is— (1) the program for entering into reimbursable fee agreements for the provision of U.S. Customs and Border Protection services established by section 560 of the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2013 (division D of Public Law 113–6 (2) the pilot program authorizing U.S. Customs and Border Protection to enter into partnerships with private sector and government entities at ports of entry established by section 559 of the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2014 (division F of Public Law 113–76 6 U.S.C. 211 910. Charter flights Section 13031(e)(1) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 ( 19 U.S.C. 58c(e)(1) (1) by striking (1) Notwithstanding section 451 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1451 (1) (A) Notwithstanding section 451 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1451 ; and (2) by adding at the end the following: (B) (i) An appropriate officer of U.S. Customs and Border Protection may assign a sufficient number of employees of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (if available) to perform services described in clause (ii) for a charter air carrier (as defined in section 40102 of title 49, United States Code) for a charter flight arriving after normal operating hours at an airport that is an established port of entry serviced by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, notwithstanding that overtime funds for those services are not available, if the charter air carrier— (I) not later than 4 hours before the flight arrives, specifically requests that such services be provided; and (II) pays any overtime fees incurred in connection with such services. (ii) Services described in this clause are customs services for passengers and their baggage or any other such service that could lawfully be performed during regular hours of operation. . 911. Amendment to Tariff Act of 1930 to require country of origin marking of certain castings (a) In general Section 304(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1304(e) (1) in the subsection heading, by striking Manhole rings or frames, covers, and assemblies thereof Castings (2) by inserting inlet frames, tree and trench grates, lampposts, lamppost bases, cast utility poles, bollards, hydrants, utility boxes, manhole rings, (3) by adding at the end before the period the following: in a location such that it will remain visible after installation (b) Effective date The amendments made by subsection (a) take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and apply with respect to the importation of castings described in such amendments on or after the date that is 180 days after such date of enactment. 912. Elimination of consumptive demand exception to prohibition on importation of goods made with convict labor, forced labor, or indentured labor; report (a) Elimination of consumptive demand exception (1) In general Section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1307 The provisions of this section of the United States. (2) Effective date The amendment made by paragraph (1) shall take effect on the date that is 15 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (b) Report required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Commissioner shall submit to the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives a report on compliance with section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1307 (1) The number of instances in which merchandise was denied entry pursuant to that section during the 1-year period preceding the submission of the report. (2) A description of the merchandise denied entry pursuant to that section. (3) Such other information as the Commissioner considers appropriate with respect to monitoring and enforcing compliance with that section. 913. Improved collection and use of labor market information Section 1137 of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1320b–7 (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in paragraph (2), by inserting (including the occupational information under subsection (g)) paragraph (3) of this subsection (B) in paragraph (3), by striking employers (as defined subject to subsection (g), employers (as defined (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (g) (1) Beginning January 1, 2017, each quarterly wage report required to be submitted by an employer under subsection (a)(3) shall include such occupational information with respect to each employee of the employer that permits the classification of such employees into occupational categories as found in the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. (2) The State agency receiving the occupational information described in paragraph (1) shall make such information available to the Secretary of Labor pursuant to procedures established by the Secretary of Labor. (3) (A) The Secretary of Labor shall make occupational information submitted under paragraph (2) available to other State and Federal agencies, including the United States Census Bureau, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and other State and Federal research agencies. (B) Disclosure of occupational information under subparagraph (A) shall be subject to the agency having safeguards in place that meet the requirements under paragraph (4). (4) The Secretary of Labor shall establish and implement safeguards for the dissemination and, subject to paragraph (5), the use of occupational information received under this subsection. (5) Occupational information received under this subsection shall only be used to classify employees into occupational categories as found in the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system and to analyze and evaluate occupations in order to improve the labor market for workers and industries. (6) The Secretary of Labor shall establish procedures to verify the accuracy of information received under paragraph (2). . 914. Statements of policy with respect to Israel Congress— (1) supports the strengthening of United States-Israel economic cooperation and recognizes the tremendous strategic, economic, and technological value of cooperation with Israel; (2) recognizes the benefit of cooperation with Israel to United States companies, including by improving United States competitiveness in global markets; (3) recognizes the importance of trade and commercial relations to the pursuit and sustainability of peace, and supports efforts to bring together the United States, Israel, the Palestinian territories, and others in enhanced commerce; (4) opposes politically motivated actions that penalize or otherwise limit commercial relations specifically with Israel such as boycotts, divestment or sanctions; (5) notes that the boycott, divestment, and sanctioning of Israel by governments, governmental bodies, quasi-governmental bodies, international organizations, and other such entities is contrary to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) principle of nondiscrimination; (6) encourages the inclusion of politically motivated actions that penalize or otherwise limit commercial relations specifically with Israel such as boycotts, divestment from, or sanctions against Israel as a topic of discussion at the U.S.-Israel Joint Economic Development Group (JEDG) and other areas to support the strengthening of the United States–Israel commercial relationship and combat any commercial discrimination against Israel; (7) supports efforts to prevent investigations or prosecutions by governments or international organizations of United States persons on the sole basis of such persons doing business with Israel, with Israeli entities, or in territories controlled by Israel; and (8) supports States of the United States examining a company’s promotion or compliance with unsanctioned boycotts, divestment from, or sanctions against Israel as part of its consideration in awarding grants and contracts and supports the divestment of State assets from companies that support or promote actions to boycott, divest from, or sanction Israel. X Offsets 1001. Revocation or denial of passport in case of certain unpaid taxes (a) In general Subchapter D of chapter 75 7345. Revocation or denial of passport in case of certain tax delinquencies (a) In general If the Secretary receives certification by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue that any individual has a seriously delinquent tax debt in an amount in excess of $50,000, the Secretary shall transmit such certification to the Secretary of State for action with respect to denial, revocation, or limitation of a passport pursuant to section 1001(d) of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (b) Seriously delinquent tax debt For purposes of this section, the term seriously delinquent tax debt (1) a debt that is being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement under section 6159 or 7122, and (2) a debt with respect to which collection is suspended because a collection due process hearing under section 6330, or relief under subsection (b), (c), or (f) of section 6015, is requested or pending. (c) Adjustment for inflation In the case of a calendar year beginning after 2016, the dollar amount in subsection (a) shall be increased by an amount equal to— (1) such dollar amount, multiplied by (2) the cost-of-living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year, determined by substituting calendar year 2015 calendar year 1992 If any amount as adjusted under the preceding sentence is not a multiple of $1,000, such amount shall be rounded to the next highest multiple of $1,000. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections for subchapter D of chapter 75 Sec. 7345. Revocation or denial of passport in case of certain tax delinquencies. . (c) Authority for information sharing (1) In general Subsection (l) of section 6103 (23) Disclosure of return information to Department of State for purposes of passport revocation under section 7345 (A) In general The Secretary shall, upon receiving a certification described in section 7345, disclose to the Secretary of State return information with respect to a taxpayer who has a seriously delinquent tax debt described in such section. Such return information shall be limited to— (i) the taxpayer identity information with respect to such taxpayer, and (ii) the amount of such seriously delinquent tax debt. (B) Restriction on disclosure Return information disclosed under subparagraph (A) may be used by officers and employees of the Department of State for the purposes of, and to the extent necessary in, carrying out the requirements of section 1001(d) of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 . (2) Conforming amendment Paragraph (4) of section 6103(p) of such Code is amended by striking or (22) (22), or (23) (d) Authority to deny or revoke passport (1) Denial (A) In general Except as provided under subparagraph (B), upon receiving a certification described in section 7345 (B) Emergency and humanitarian situations Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), the Secretary of State may issue a passport, in emergency circumstances or for humanitarian reasons, to an individual described in such subparagraph. (2) Revocation (A) In general The Secretary of State may revoke a passport previously issued to any individual described in paragraph (1)(A). (B) Limitation for return to united states If the Secretary of State decides to revoke a passport under subparagraph (A), the Secretary of State, before revocation, may— (i) limit a previously issued passport only for return travel to the United States; or (ii) issue a limited passport that only permits return travel to the United States. (3) Hold harmless The Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of State shall not be liable to an individual for any action with respect to a certification by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue under section 7345 (e) Revocation or denial of passport in case of individual without social security account number (1) Denial (A) In general Except as provided under subparagraph (B), upon receiving an application for a passport from an individual that either— (i) does not include the social security account number issued to that individual, or (ii) includes an incorrect or invalid social security number willfully, intentionally, negligently, or recklessly provided by such individual, the Secretary of State is authorized to deny such application and is authorized to not issue a passport to the individual. (B) Emergency and humanitarian situations Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), the Secretary of State may issue a passport, in emergency circumstances or for humanitarian reasons, to an individual described in subparagraph (A). (2) Revocation (A) In general The Secretary of State may revoke a passport previously issued to any individual described in paragraph (1)(A). (B) Limitation for return to United States If the Secretary of State decides to revoke a passport under subparagraph (A), the Secretary of State, before revocation, may— (i) limit a previously issued passport only for return travel to the United States; or (ii) issue a limited passport that only permits return travel to the United States. (f) Effective date The provisions of, and amendments made by, this section shall take effect on January 1, 2016. 1002. Customs user fees (a) In general Section 13031(j)(3) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 ( 19 U.S.C. 58c(j)(3) (C) Fees may be charged under paragraphs (9) and (10) of subsection (a) during the period beginning on July 8, 2025, and ending on July 28, 2025. . (b) Rate for merchandise processing fees Section 503 of the United States–Korea Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act ( Public Law 112–41 (1) by striking For the period (a) In general (2) by adding at the end the following: (b) Additional period For the period beginning on July 1, 2025, and ending on July 14, 2025, section 13031(a)(9) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 ( 19 U.S.C. 58c(a)(9) (1) in subparagraph (A), by substituting 0.3464 0.21 (2) in subparagraph (B)(i), by substituting 0.3464 0.21 . May 11, 2015 Read twice and placed on the calendar

Summary: (This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary has been expanded because action occurred on the measure.) Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 TITLE I--TRADE FACILITATION AND TRADE ENFORCEMENT (Sec. 101) This bill directs the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to ensure that CBP partnership programs, such as the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism, provide trade benefits to importers, exporters, and certain other private sector entities that meet program requirements. (Sec. 102) The Government Accountability Office (GAO) must report to Congress on the effectiveness of CBP enforcement of U.S. customs and trade laws (trade enforcement). (Sec. 103) CBP shall establish priorities and performance standards to measure levels of achievement of customs modernization, the movement of merchandise into and out of the United States (trade facilitation), and trade enforcement functions and programs. (Sec. 104) CBP and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) shall: establish educational seminars to improve CBP classification and appraisal of imported articles, trade enforcement, and facilitation of international trade; and develop biennially a joint strategic plan for improving trade enforcement and trade facilitation. (Sec. 106) This bill amends the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA) to authorize appropriations for FY2016-FY2018 from the Customs Commercial and Homeland Security Automation Account to complete the development and implementation of the Automated Commercial Environment computer system. The Customs Border Security Act of 2002 is amended to require CBP to report to Congress on: its incorporation of all core trade processing capabilities into the Automated Commercial Environment computer system to conform with admissibility criteria of federal agencies participating in the International Trade Data System (ITDS); the components of the National Customs Automation Program that have not been implemented; and any additional Program components it has initiated to complete the development, establishment, and implementation of the computer system. The CBP must update the report as well as: evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of the computer system, and detail monthly the percentage of trade processed in the Automated Commercial Environment since September 30, 2016. The GAO must report to Congress on: the progress of other federal agencies in accessing and utilizing the Automated Commercial Environment, and the potential cost savings to the government and importers and exporters and the potential benefits to trade enforcement if the identified elements are implemented. (Sec. 107) This bill amends the Tariff Act of 1930 to require the Department of the Treasury to work with the head of each agency participating in the ITDS and the Interagency Steering Committee to ensure that, among other duties, it: develops and maintains the necessary information technology infrastructure to support the operation of the ITDS, submits all data to the ITDS electronically, and arranges to share information between each agency and the CBP. (Sec. 108) It shall be a U.S. negotiating objective in any negotiation for a mutual recognition arrangement with a foreign country on partnership programs to seek to ensure the compatibility of that country's partnership programs with CBP partnership programs to enhance trade facilitation and trade enforcement. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) shall consult with specified congressional committees within 30 days before initiating negotiations and within 30 days before entering into an agreement. (Sec. 109) Treasury and DHS shall jointly establish a Commercial Customs Operations Advisory Committee. (Sec. 110) CBP shall develop and implement CBP-wide Centers of Excellence and Expertise to enhance the economic competitiveness of the United States. (Sec. 111) DHS shall establish within the CBP Office of International Trade a Commercial Targeting Division (including National Targeting and Analysis Groups) to conduct commercial risk assessment targeting and, when needed, issue trade alerts with respect to cargo destined for the United States. (Sec. 112) The Treasury Inspector General shall report biennially to Congress on oversight of revenue protection and enforcement measures. (Sec. 113) DHS and Treasury shall report jointly to Congress on security and revenue measures with respect to merchandise transported in bond. (Sec. 114) DHS shall establish a program to assign importer of record numbers. (Sec. 115) CBP shall establish a new importer program that adjusts bond amounts for new importers based on the level of risk assessed for revenue protection. TITLE II--IMPORT HEALTH AND SAFETY (Sec. 201) An interagency Import Safety Working Group is established. (Sec. 202) DHS shall develop, and appropriately update, a joint import safety rapid response plan that sets forth protocols for the CBP to: coordinate federal responses to cargo entering the United States that poses a threat to the health or safety of U.S. consumers, and use in recovering from or mitigating the effects of actions and responses to such an incident. (Sec. 203) CBP shall ensure that CBP personnel assigned to U.S. ports of entry are effectively trained to ensure the safety and expeditious entry of merchandise into the United States. TITLE III--IMPORT-RELATED PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (Sec. 302) The Tariff Act of 1930 is amended to declare that, upon suspicion that merchandise is being imported into the United States in violation of U.S. trademark or copyright infringement laws, CBP shall provide the trademark or copyright owner any information appearing on the merchandise and its packaging and labels, including any unredacted images of them, if testing by the owner would assist in determining a violation. The CBP shall not provide such information if it would compromise an ongoing law enforcement investigation or national security. (Sec. 303) A technology, product, service, device, or its component that is imported into the United States in violation of infringement of U.S. copyright laws may be seized and forfeited by CBP. (Sec. 304) DHS shall authorize a process for the enforcement of a copyright of an owner who has applied for registration of merchandise with the U.S. Copyright Office to the same extent as if the copyright were registered with the Office, including by sharing information, images, samples of the suspected infringing merchandise. (Sec. 305) DHS shall establish within ICE a National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center to coordinate U.S. activities to prevent the import and export of goods that infringe intellectual property rights. (Sec. 306) CBP, ICE, and DHS shall take specified actions for enforcement of intellectual property rights. (Sec. 310) The CBP and ICE shall report to Congress on intellectual property rights enforcement. (Sec. 311) DHS shall develop and carry out an educational campaign to inform travelers entering or leaving the United States about the legal, economic, and public health and safety implications of acquiring merchandise that infringes intellectual property rights outside the United States and importing such merchandise into the United States in violation of U.S. law. TITLE IV--EVASION OF ANTIDUMPING AND COUNTERVAILING DUTY ORDERS Enforcing Orders and Reducing Customs Evasion Act of 2015 (Sec. 402) This bill amends the Tariff Act of 1930 to require CBP to: investigate other federal agency claims of evasion of antidumping (AD) or countervailing duties (CVD), including any cash deposits or other security, with respect to covered merchandise entered into the United States; and take specified enforcement actions if necessary, including suspension of liquidation. This requirement applies to goods from Mexico and Canada as well as goods from elsewhere. (Sec. 403) CBP shall report to Congress on its efforts to prevent and investigate the evasion of antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders with respect to covered merchandise entered into the United States. TITLE V--AMENDMENTS TO ANTIDUMPING AND COUNTERVAILING DUTY LAWS (Sec. 501) This bill amends the Tariff Act of 1930 with respect to administration and enforcement of AD and CVD orders. Neither the administering authority (the Secretary of Commerce, or another U.S. officer given the responsibility by law) nor the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC), as the case may be, is required to determine, or make any adjustments to, a countervailable subsidy rate or weighted average dumping margin based on any assumptions about information the interested party would have provided if it had complied with a request for information. The administering authority and the USITC, when relying during an AD or CVD proceeding on secondary information rather than on information obtained in the course of an investigation or review, shall not be required to corroborate any dumping margin or CVD in a separate segment of the same proceeding. The administering authority may use a countervailable subsidy rate or dumping margin meeting specified criteria, including the highest rate or margin, when making an inference adverse to a party's interests. (Sec. 502) The USITC shall not determine that there is no material injury or threat of material injury to a domestic industry from imports merely because that industry is profitable or its performance has recently improved. This bill includes gross profits, operating profits, net profits, and ability to service debt among the relevant economic factors the USITC must evaluate in examining the impact of imports of merchandise on a domestic industry in material injury determinations. The USITC, in determining market share and the factors affecting financial performance when domestic producers internally transfer significant production of the domestic like product for the production of a downstream article and sell significant production of the domestic like product in the merchant market, may no longer need to find that the production of the domestic like product sold in the merchant market is not generally used in the production of that downstream article. (Sec. 503) The administering authority shall consider to be outside the ordinary course of trade any particular market situation that prevents a proper comparison with the export price or constructed export price. The administering authority may use another calculation methodology than the ordinary one in determining the constructed value of subject merchandise being imported at less than fair value if a particular market situation exists where the cost of materials and fabrication or other processing of any kind does not accurately reflect the cost production in the ordinary course of trade. (Sec. 504) This bill revises requirements regarding administering authority determinations as to whether there are reasonable grounds to believe or suspect that a foreign like product is being sold at less than cost of production in AD investigations or reviews. Information supplied by an interested party, based upon observed prices or constructed prices or costs, may no longer constitute a reasonable ground to believe or suspect such a sales condition. The administering authority in making its determinations, however, shall request information necessary to calculate the constructed value and cost of production of subject merchandise in such investigations or reviews. The administering authority, in valuing the factors of production to determine the normal value of merchandise exported from a nonmarket economy country, may disregard price or cost values without further investigation if it determines that broadly available export subsidies existed or instances of subsidization occurred with respect to those price or cost values or if they were subject to an AD order. (Sec. 505) Certain factors are specified for the administering authority to consider when deciding whether it would be unduly burdensome in CVD or AD investigations and reviews to examine voluntary responses from exporters or producers which are not the subjects of the investigation or review. TITLE VI--ADDITIONAL TRADE ENFORCEMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS PROTECTION Subtitle A--Trade Enforcement (Sec. 601) This bill amends the Trade Act of 1974 to revise requirements for the identification of U.S. trade expansion priorities. The United States Trade Representative (USTR) shall consult with Congress to prioritize, investigate, and resolve acts, policies, or practices of foreign countries that raise concerns with respect to obligations under the World Trade Organization Agreements or any other trade agreement to which the United States is a party, or that otherwise creates barriers to U.S. goods, services, or investment. (Sec. 602) The USTR may take actions to suspend concessions or other obligations under the Uruguay Round Agreements Act if: certain action has terminated that was taken by the USTR to protect U.S. rights under any trade agreement or to eliminate an act, policy, or practice of a foreign country that violates that agreement or burdens or restricts U.S. commerce; the petitioner or any representative of the domestic industry that would benefit from reinstatement of such action requests the USTR for reinstatement; and the USTR meets certain requirements. (Sec. 603) USITC, under the Trade Act of 1974, shall make an import monitoring tool available on a website to allow public access to data on the volume and value of imported goods to assess whether such data has changed over time. (Sec. 604) There is established within the Office of the USTR: an Interagency Trade Enforcement Center, and the position of Chief Manufacturing Negotiator. (Sec. 606) The USTR may take certain discretionary trade action against foreign countries that engage in unreasonable acts, policies, or practices that fail to enforce their environmental laws effectively. (Sec. 607) A Trade Enforcement Trust Fund is established for deposit of amounts equivalent to AD and CVD receipts, which the USTR may use to seek to enforce obligations under the WTO Agreements and free trade agreements, monitor foreign country implementation of similar obligations, and investigate and respond to complaint petitions. The GAO shall: analyze the trade enforcement expenditures of each federal agency with trade responsibilities, and recommend additional employees and resources each agency may need to enforce effectively free trade agreements to which the United States is a party. (Sec. 608) CBP shall ensure that appropriate resources address concerns that honey as well as illicit cultural property, archaeological or ethnological materials, and fish, wildlife, and plants are being imported into the United States in violation of U.S. customs laws. (Sec. 609) DHS shall deposit into a special account certain interest earned on amounts realized by CBP on antidumping duties or countervailing duties assessed on or after October 1, 2014. The interest shall be included in any CBP duty distributions to affected domestic producers for qualifying expenses. Subtitle B--Intellectual Property Rights Protection (Sec. 611) The Office of the USTR shall now include one presidentially appointed Chief Innovation and Intellectual Property Negotiator, who shall conduct trade negotiations and enforce trade agreements with respect to U.S. intellectual property as well as take appropriate actions to address foreign acts, policies, and practices with a significant adverse impact on the value of U.S. innovation. (Sec. 612) The USTR shall develop, not later than 90 days after submission of the National Trade Estimate, an action plan of certain benchmarks for achieving adequate protection of intellectual property rights for each foreign country placed and remaining on a priority watch list for at least one year. Appropriations are authorized for the USTR Office to provide assistance to any developing country on the priority watch list to comply with the benchmarks in the action plan. TITLE VII--CURRENCY MANIPULATION Subtitle A--Investigation of Currency Undervaluation Currency Undervaluation Investigation Act (Sec. 702) This bill amends the Tariff Act of 1930 to require the administering authority, upon the filing of a petition by an interested party, to initiate a CVD investigation or review to determine whether currency undervaluation by the government of, or any public entity within, a foreign country is providing, directly or indirectly, a countervailable subsidy to its exporters or products. (Sec. 704) An export subsidy, under current law, is one that is, in law or in fact, contingent upon export performance, alone or as one of two or more conditions. The fact that an export subsidy may also be provided in circumstances not involving export shall not, for that reason alone, according to this Act, mean it cannot be considered export contingent and actionable under a CVD and AD proceeding. (Sec. 705) This subtitle applies to goods from Mexico and Canada as well as goods from elsewhere. Subtitle B--Engagement on Currency Exchange Rate and Economic Policies (Sec. 711) The Treasury shall report to Congress on the macroeconomic and currency exchange rate policies of each major trading partner of the United States. The President may take specified remedial action against any such countries that fail to adopt policies to correct the undervaluation of their currency and trade surplus with the United States. (Sec. 712) An Advisory Committee on International Exchange Rate Policy is established. TITLE VIII--PROCESS FOR CONSIDERATION OF TEMPORARY DUTY SUSPENSIONS AND REDUCTIONS American Manufacturing Competitiveness Act of 2015 (Sec. 802) It is the sense of Congress that it should consider a miscellaneous tariff bill not later than 180 days after the USITC and the Department of Commerce issue reports on any proposed duty suspensions and reductions. (Sec. 803) The appropriate congressional committees shall establish, and publish on their publicly available websites, a process for the submission and consideration of legislation for proposed duty suspensions and reductions as well as a miscellaneous tariff bill including them, consistent with certain requirements. (Sec. 804) The USITC shall report to Congress, by May 1, 2018, and May 1, 2020, on the effects of such suspensions and reductions on the U.S. economy. (Sec. 805) The exercise of functions under this title shall not be subject to judicial review. TITLE IX--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS (Sec. 901) It is the sense of Congress that the USTR should encourage other countries to establish commercially meaningful de minimis values for express and postal shipments that are exempt from customs duties and taxes and from certain other entry documentation requirements. This bill amends the Tariff Act of 1930 to increase from $200 to $800 the general de minimis aggregate fair retail value in the country of shipment of duty-free articles imported by one person on one day. (Sec. 902) Specified deadlines shall now apply to trade and customs revenue consultation requirements of the Safety and Accountability for Every Port Act for DHS. (Sec. 903) This bill also prescribes or revises requirements under the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States for: certain penalties for customs brokers convicted of an act of terrorism; duty-free treatment of certain federal property exported and reimported without an advance in value or improvement in condition; duties on warranty repairs or alterations of articles exported from and then returned to the United States; exemption from duty treatment of the residue of bulk cargo contained in instruments of international traffic previously exported from the United States; drawback (refund of paid customs duties) on eligible merchandise imported into the United States and later exported or destroyed; assignment of CBP employees to perform customs services for charter flight passengers and their baggage; country of origin marking of certain castings imported into the United States; and elimination of the consumptive demand exception to the prohibition on the importation of goods made with convict labor, forced labor, or indentured labor. (Sec. 907) When the President submits to the Senate, under the Trade Act of 1974, a nomination for appointment as a Deputy USTR, the submission shall include information on the country, regional offices, and functions of the Office of the USTR with respect to which that individual will have responsibility. (Sec. 908) The USTR shall conduct a series of investigations and assessments regarding competitiveness issues facing the U.S. economy and competitive conditions for certain key U.S. industries. (Sec. 909) The CBP Commissioner shall report to Congress within one year after entering into any agreement under: the program for entering into reimbursable fee agreements for the provision of CBP services, upon the request of any persons, at existing CBP-serviced facilities, at new facilities, and at land border facilities; or the pilot program authorizing the CBP to enter into partnerships with private sector and government entities at ports of entry for certain services and to accept certain donations. (Sec. 913) The quarterly wage report for each employee which an employer must submit to a state under the income and eligibility verification system required by the Social Security Act shall, beginning January 1, 2017, include information that permits the classification of such employees into occupational categories as found in the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system in order to analyze and evaluate occupations to improve the labor market for workers and industries. The Department of Labor shall: make occupational information received from the states available to other state and federal agencies, including the U.S. Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics; and establish and implement safeguards for the dissemination and the use of such occupational information. (Sec. 914) Certain trade policies regarding Israel are declared. TITLE X--OFFSETS (Sec. 1001) This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to prescribe requirements for revocation, denial, or limitation of a passport for individuals with seriously delinquent tax debt in excess of $50,000. (Sec. 1002) This bill amends the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 to allow, between July 8 and July 28, 2025, specified customs user fees for the processing of merchandise formally entered or released into the United States. The United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act is also amended to extend through June 30, 2025, the increase from 0.21% ad valorem to 0.3464% ad valorem in the customs user fees for the processing of merchandise formally entered or released into the United States which is scheduled to begin on December 1, 2015.