Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2017

To reauthorize and improve the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2017 2. Table of contents The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title. Sec. 2. Table of contents. TITLE I—Declaration of purpose and definitions Sec. 101. Purposes. Sec. 102. Definitions. TITLE II—Juvenile justice and delinquency prevention Sec. 201. Concentration of Federal efforts. Sec. 202. Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Sec. 203. Annual report. Sec. 204. Allocation of funds. Sec. 205. State plans. Sec. 206. Reallocation of grant funds. Sec. 207. Authority to make grants. Sec. 208. Eligibility of States. Sec. 209. Grants to Indian tribes. Sec. 210. Research and evaluation; statistical analyses; information dissemination. Sec. 211. Training and technical assistance. Sec. 212. Administrative authority. TITLE III—Incentive grants for local delinquency prevention programs Sec. 301. Definitions. Sec. 302. Grants for delinquency prevention programs. Sec. 303. Technical and conforming amendment. TITLE IV—Miscellaneous provisions Sec. 401. Evaluation by Government Accountability Office. Sec. 402. Authorization of appropriations. Sec. 403. Accountability and oversight. TITLE V—Juvenile accountability block grants Sec. 501. Grant eligibility. I Declaration of purpose and definitions 101. Purposes Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5602 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting , tribal, State (2) in paragraph (2)— (A) by inserting , tribal, State (B) by striking and (3) by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows: (3) to assist State, tribal, and local governments in addressing juvenile crime through the provision of technical assistance, research, training, evaluation, and the dissemination of current and relevant information on effective and evidence-based programs and practices for combating juvenile delinquency; and ; and (4) by adding at the end the following: (4) to support a continuum of evidence-based or promising programs (including delinquency prevention, intervention, mental health and substance abuse treatment, family services, and services for children exposed to violence) that are trauma informed, reflect the science of adolescent development, and are designed to meet the needs of at-risk youth and youth who come into contact with the justice system. . 102. Definitions Section 103 of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5603 (1) in paragraph (8)— (A) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by adding or (B) by striking subparagraph (C); and (C) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (C); (2) by amending paragraph (18) to read as follows: (18) the term Indian tribe . (3) by amending paragraph (22) to read as follows: (22) the term jail or lockup for adults ; (4) by amending paragraph (25) to read as follows: (25) the term sight or sound contact ; (5) by amending paragraph (26) to read as follows: (26) the term adult inmate (A) means an individual who— (i) has reached the age of full criminal responsibility under applicable State law; and (ii) has been arrested and is in custody for or awaiting trial on a criminal charge, or is convicted of a criminal offense; and (B) does not include an individual who— (i) at the time of the offense, was younger than the maximum age at which a youth can be held in a juvenile facility under applicable State law; and (ii) was committed to the care and custody or supervision, including post-placement or parole supervision, of a juvenile correctional agency by a court of competent jurisdiction or by operation of applicable State law; ; (6) in paragraph (28), by striking and (7) in paragraph (29), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and (8) by adding at the end the following: (30) the term core requirements (A) means the requirements described in paragraphs (11), (12), (13), and (15) of section 223(a); and (B) does not include the data collection requirements described in subparagraphs (A) through (K) of section 207(1); (31) the term chemical agent (32) the term isolation (A) means any instance in which a youth is confined alone for more than 15 minutes in a room or cell; and (B) does not include— (i) confinement during regularly scheduled sleeping hours; (ii) separation based on a treatment program approved by a licensed medical or mental health professional; (iii) confinement or separation that is requested by the youth; or (iv) the separation of the youth from a group in a nonlocked setting for the limited purpose of calming; (33) the term restraints 42 U.S.C. 290ii (34) the term evidence-based (A) is demonstrated to be effective when implemented with fidelity; (B) is based on a clearly articulated and empirically supported theory; (C) has measurable outcomes relevant to juvenile justice, including a detailed description of the outcomes produced in a particular population, whether urban or rural; and (D) has been scientifically tested and proven effective through randomized control studies or comparison group studies and with the ability to replicate and scale; (35) the term promising (A) is demonstrated to be effective based on positive outcomes relevant to juvenile justice from one or more objective, independent, and scientifically valid evaluations, as documented in writing to the Administrator; and (B) will be evaluated through a well-designed and rigorous study, as described in paragraph (34)(D); (36) the term dangerous practice (37) the term screening (A) designed to identify youth who may have mental health, behavioral health, substance abuse, or other needs requiring immediate attention, intervention, and further evaluation; and (B) the purpose of which is to quickly identify a youth with possible mental health, behavioral health, substance abuse, or other needs in need of further assessment; (38) the term assessment (A) by an appropriately trained professional who is licensed or certified by the applicable State in the mental health, behavioral health, or substance abuse fields; and (B) which is designed to identify significant mental health, behavioral health, or substance abuse treatment needs to be addressed during a youth's confinement; (39) for purposes of section 223(a)(15), the term contact (40) the term trauma-informed (A) understanding the impact that exposure to violence and trauma have on a youth's physical, psychological, and psychosocial development; (B) recognizing when a youth has been exposed to violence and trauma and is in need of help to recover from the adverse impacts of trauma; and (C) responding in ways that resist retraumatization; (41) the term racial and ethnic disparity (42) the term status offender (43) the term rural (44) the term internal controls (A) effectiveness and efficiency of operations, such as grant management practices; (B) reliability of reporting for internal and external use; and (C) compliance with applicable laws and regulations, as well as recommendations of the Office of Inspector General and the Government Accountability Office; and (45) the term tribal government . II Juvenile justice and delinquency prevention 201. Concentration of Federal efforts Section 204 of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5614 (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in paragraph (1), in the first sentence— (i) by striking a long-term plan, and implement a long-term plan to improve the juvenile justice system in the United States, taking into account scientific knowledge regarding adolescent development and behavior and regarding the effects of delinquency prevention programs and juvenile justice interventions on adolescents, and shall implement (ii) by striking research, and improvement of the juvenile justice system in the United States and research (B) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking Federal Register Federal Register during the 30-day period ending on October 1 of each year. (2) in subsection (b)— (A) by striking paragraph (7); (B) by redesignating paragraphs (5) and (6) as paragraphs (6) and (7), respectively; (C) by inserting after paragraph (4), the following: (5) not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2017 ; (D) in paragraph (6), as so redesignated, by adding and (E) in paragraph (7), as so redesignated— (i) by striking monitoring (ii) by striking section 223(a)(15) section 223(a)(16) (iii) by striking to review the adequacy of such systems; and for monitoring compliance. 202. Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Section 206 of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5616 (1) in subsection (a) (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) by inserting the Administrator of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, (ii) by striking Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization Assistant Secretary for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (B) in paragraph (2), by striking United States Federal Government (2) in subsection (c)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking paragraphs (12)(A), (13), and (14) of section 223(a) of this title the core requirements (B) in paragraph (2)— (i) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting , on an annual basis collectively (ii) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following: (B) not later than 120 days after the completion of the last meeting of the Council during any fiscal year, submit to the Committee on Education and the Workforce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate a report that— (i) contains the recommendations described in subparagraph (A); (ii) includes a detailed account of the activities conducted by the Council during the fiscal year, including a complete detailed accounting of expenses incurred by the Council to conduct operations in accordance with this section; (iii) is published on the websites of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, the Council, and the Department of Justice; and (iv) is in addition to the annual report required under section 207. . 203. Annual report Section 207 of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5617 (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking a fiscal year each fiscal year (2) in paragraph (1)— (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking and gender , gender, and ethnicity, as such term is defined by the Bureau of the Census, (B) in subparagraph (E), by striking and (C) in subparagraph (F)— (i) by inserting and other disabilities, (ii) by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and (D) by adding at the end the following: (G) a summary of data from 1 month of the applicable fiscal year of the use of restraints and isolation upon juveniles held in the custody of secure detention and correctional facilities operated by a State or unit of local government; (H) the number of status offense cases petitioned to court, number of status offenders held in secure detention, the findings used to justify the use of secure detention, and the average period of time a status offender was held in secure detention; (I) the number of juveniles released from custody and the type of living arrangement to which they are released; (J) the number of juveniles whose offense originated on school grounds, during school-sponsored off-campus activities, or due to a referral by a school official, as collected and reported by the Department of Education or similar State educational agency; and (K) the number of juveniles in the custody of secure detention and correctional facilities operated by a State or unit of local government who report being pregnant. ; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (5) A description of the criteria used to determine what programs qualify as evidence-based and promising programs under this title and title V and a comprehensive list of those programs the Administrator has determined meet such criteria in both rural and urban areas. (6) A description of funding provided to Indian tribes under this Act or for a juvenile delinquency or prevention program under the Tribal Law and Order Act of 2010 ( Public Law 111–211 (7) An analysis and evaluation of the internal controls at the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention to determine if grantees are following the requirements of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention grant programs and what remedial action the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention has taken to recover any grant funds that are expended in violation of the grant programs, including instances— (A) in which supporting documentation was not provided for cost reports; (B) where unauthorized expenditures occurred; or (C) where subrecipients of grant funds were not compliant with program requirements. (8) An analysis and evaluation of the total amount of payments made to grantees that the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention recouped from grantees that were found to be in violation of policies and procedures of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention grant programs, including— (A) the full name and location of the grantee; (B) the violation of the program found; (C) the amount of funds sought to be recouped by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention; and (D) the actual amount recouped by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. . 204. Allocation of funds (a) Technical assistance Section 221(b)(1) of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5631(b)(1) 2 percent 5 percent (b) Other allocations Section 222 of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5632 (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking age eighteen 18 years of age, based on the most recent data available from the Bureau of the Census (B) by striking paragraphs (2) and (3) and inserting the following: (2) (A) If the aggregate amount appropriated for a fiscal year to carry out this title is less than $75,000,000, then— (i) the amount allocated to each State other than a State described in clause (ii) for that fiscal year shall be not less than $400,000; and (ii) the amount allocated to the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands for that fiscal year shall be not less than $75,000. (B) If the aggregate amount appropriated for a fiscal year to carry out this title is not less than $75,000,000, then— (i) the amount allocated to each State other than a State described in clause (ii) for that fiscal year shall be not less than $600,000; and (ii) the amount allocated to the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands for that fiscal year shall be not less than $100,000. ; (2) in subsection (c), by striking efficient administration, including monitoring, evaluation, and one full-time staff position effective and efficient administration of funds, including the designation of not less than 1 individual who shall coordinate efforts to achieve and sustain compliance with the core requirements and certify whether the State is in compliance with such requirements (3) in subsection (d), by striking 5 per centum of the minimum not more than 5 percent of the 205. State plans Section 223 of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5633 (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking and shall describe the status of compliance with State plan requirements. and shall describe how the State plan is supported by or takes account of scientific knowledge regarding adolescent development and behavior and regarding the effects of delinquency prevention programs and juvenile justice interventions on adolescents. Not later than 60 days after the date on which a plan or amended plan submitted under this subsection is finalized, a State shall make the plan or amended plan publicly available by posting the plan or amended plan on the State's publicly available website. (B) in paragraph (3)— (i) in subparagraph (A)— (I) in clause (i), by inserting adolescent development, concerning (II) in clause (ii)— (aa) in subclause (II), by striking counsel for children and youth publicly supported court-appointed legal counsel for juveniles charged with an act of juvenile delinquency or a status offense, consistent with other Federal law (bb) in subclause (III), by striking mental health, education, special education child and adolescent mental health, education, child and adolescent substance abuse, special education, services for youth with disabilities (cc) in subclause (V), by striking delinquents or potential delinquents delinquent youth or youth at risk of delinquency (dd) in subclause (VI), by striking youth workers involved with representatives of (ee) in subclause (VII), by striking and (ff) by striking subclause (VIII) and inserting the following: (VIII) persons, licensed or certified by the applicable State, with expertise and competence in preventing and addressing mental health and substance abuse needs in juvenile delinquents and those at-risk of delinquency; (IX) representatives of victim or witness advocacy groups, including at least 1 individual with expertise in addressing the challenges of sexual abuse and exploitation and trauma; and (X) for a State in which one or more Indian tribes are located, an Indian tribal representative or, if such Indian tribal representative is unavailable, other individual with significant expertise in tribal law enforcement and juvenile justice in Indian tribal communities; ; (III) in clause (iv), by striking 24 at the time of appointment 28 at the time of initial appointment (IV) in clause (v) by inserting or, if not feasible and in appropriate circumstances, who is the parent or guardian of someone who has been or is currently under the jurisdiction of the juvenile justice system juvenile justice system (ii) in subparagraph (C), by striking 30 days 45 days (iii) in subparagraph (D)(ii), by striking at least annually recommendations regarding State compliance with the requirements of paragraphs (11), (12), and (13) at least every 2 years a report and necessary recommendations regarding State compliance with the core requirements (iv) in subparagraph (E)— (I) in clause (i), by adding and (II) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; (C) in paragraph (5)(C), by striking Indian tribes applicable to the detention and confinement of juveniles Indian tribes that agree to attempt to comply with the core requirements applicable to the detention and confinement of juveniles (D) in paragraph (7)— (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking performs law enforcement functions has jurisdiction (ii) in subparagraph (B)— (I) in clause (iii), by striking and (II) by striking clause (iv) and inserting the following: (iv) a plan to provide alternatives to detention for status offenders, juveniles who have been induced to perform commercial sex acts, and others, where appropriate, such as specialized or problem-solving courts or diversion to home-based or community-based services or treatment for those youth in need of mental health, substance abuse, or co-occurring disorder services at the time such juveniles first come into contact with the juvenile justice system; (v) a plan to reduce the number of children housed in secure detention and corrections facilities who are awaiting placement in residential treatment programs; (vi) a plan to engage family members, where appropriate, in the design and delivery of juvenile delinquency prevention and treatment services, particularly post-placement; (vii) a plan to use community-based services to respond to the needs of at-risk youth or youth who have come into contact with the juvenile justice system; (viii) a plan to promote evidence-based and trauma-informed programs and practices; and (ix) not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2017 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2017 (I) eliminate the use of restraints of known pregnant juveniles housed in secure juvenile detention and correction facilities, during labor, delivery, and post-partum recovery, unless credible, reasonable grounds exist to believe the detainee presents an immediate and serious threat of hurting herself, staff, or others; and (II) eliminate the use of abdominal restraints, leg and ankle restraints, wrist restraints behind the back, and four-point restraints on known pregnant juveniles, unless— (aa) credible, reasonable grounds exist to believe the detainee presents an immediate and serious threat of hurting herself, staff, or others; or (bb) reasonable grounds exist to believe the detainee presents an immediate and credible risk of escape that cannot be reasonably minimized through any other method; ; (E) in paragraph (8), by striking existing evidence-based and promising (F) in paragraph (9)— (i) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting , with priority in funding given to entities meeting the criteria for evidence-based or promising programs used for (ii) in subparagraph (A)(i), by inserting status offenders and other youth who need (iii) in subparagraph (B)(i)— (I) by striking parents and other family members status offenders, other youth, and the parents and other family members of such offenders and youth (II) by striking be retained remain (iv) in subparagraph (E)— (I) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking delinquent at-risk or delinquent youth (II) in clause (i), by inserting , including for truancy prevention and reduction (v) by redesignating subparagraphs (G) through (S) as subparagraphs (H) through (T), respectively; (vi) in subparagraph (F), in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking expanding programs to expand (vii) by inserting after subparagraph (F), the following: (G) expanding access to publicly supported, court-appointed legal counsel and enhancing capacity for the competent representation of every child, consistent with other Federal law; ; (viii) in subparagraph (H), as so redesignated, by striking State, State, tribal, (ix) in subparagraph (M), as so redesignated— (I) in clause (i)— (aa) by inserting pre-adjudication and post-adjudication (bb) by striking restraints alternatives (cc) by inserting specialized or problem-solving courts, (including (II) in clause (ii)— (aa) by striking by the provision by the Administrator (bb) by striking to States (x) in subparagraph (N), as redesignated— (I) by inserting and reduce the risk of recidivism families (II) by striking so that juveniles may be retained in their homes (xi) in subparagraph (S), as so redesignated, by striking and (xii) in subparagraph (T), as so redesignated— (I) by inserting or co-occurring disorder mental health (II) by inserting court-involved or incarcerated (III) by striking suspected to be (IV) by striking and discharge plans provision of treatment, and development of discharge plans (V) by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and (xiii) by inserting after subparagraph (T) the following: (U) programs and projects designed to inform juveniles of the opportunity and process for expunging juvenile records and to assist juveniles in pursuing juvenile record ex­punge­ments for both adjudications and arrests not followed by adjudications; (V) programs that address the needs of girls in or at risk of entering the juvenile justice system, including pregnant girls, young mothers, survivors of commercial sexual exploitation or domestic child sex trafficking, girls with disabilities, and girls of color, including girls who are members of an Indian tribe; and (W) monitoring for compliance with the core requirements and providing training and technical assistance on the core requirements to secure facilities; ; (G) by striking paragraph (11) and inserting the following: (11) (A) in accordance with rules issued by the Administrator, provide that a juvenile shall not be placed in a secure detention facility or a secure correctional facility, if— (i) the juvenile is charged with or has committed an offense that would not be criminal if committed by an adult, excluding— (I) a juvenile who is charged with or has committed a violation of section 922(x)(2) of title 18, United States Code, or of a similar State law; (II) a juvenile who is charged with or has committed a violation of a valid court order issued and reviewed in accordance with paragraph (23); and (III) a juvenile who is held in accordance with the Interstate Compact on Juveniles as enacted by the State; or (ii) the juvenile— (I) is not charged with any offense; and (II) (aa) is an alien; or (bb) is alleged to be dependent, neglected, or abused; and (B) require that— (i) not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2017 (I) shall not have sight or sound contact with adult inmates; and (II) except as provided in paragraph (13), may not be held in any jail or lockup for adults; (ii) in determining under subparagraph (A) whether it is in the interest of justice to permit a juvenile to be held in any jail or lockup for adults, or have sight or sound contact with adult inmates, a court shall consider— (I) the age of the juvenile; (II) the physical and mental maturity of the juvenile; (III) the present mental state of the juvenile, including whether the juvenile presents an imminent risk of harm to the juvenile; (IV) the nature and circumstances of the alleged offense; (V) the juvenile's history of prior delinquent acts; (VI) the relative ability of the available adult and juvenile detention facilities to not only meet the specific needs of the juvenile but also to protect the safety of the public as well as other detained youth; and (VII) any other relevant factor; and (iii) if a court determines under subparagraph (A) that it is in the interest of justice to permit a juvenile to be held in any jail or lockup for adults— (I) the court shall hold a hearing not less frequently than once every 30 days, or in the case of a rural jurisdiction, not less frequently than once every 45 days, to review whether it is still in the interest of justice to permit the juvenile to be so held or have such sight or sound contact; and (II) the juvenile shall not be held in any jail or lockup for adults, or permitted to have sight or sound contact with adult inmates, for more than 180 days, unless the court, in writing, determines there is good cause for an extension or the juvenile expressly waives this limitation; . (H) in paragraph (12)(A), by striking contact sight or sound contact (I) in paragraph (13), by striking contact sight or sound contact (J) by striking paragraphs (22) and (27); (K) by redesignating paragraph (28) as paragraph (27); (L) by redesignating paragraphs (15) through (21) as paragraphs (16) through (22), respectively; (M) by inserting after paragraph (14) the following: (15) implement policy, practice, and system improvement strategies at the State, territorial, local, and tribal levels, as applicable, to identify and reduce racial and ethnic disparities among youth who come into contact with the juvenile justice system, without establishing or requiring numerical standards or quotas, by— (A) establishing or designating existing coordinating bodies, composed of juvenile justice stakeholders, (including representatives of the educational system) at the State, local, or tribal levels, to advise efforts by States, units of local government, and Indian tribes to reduce racial and ethnic disparities; (B) identifying and analyzing key decision points in State, local, or tribal juvenile justice systems to determine which points create racial and ethnic disparities among youth who come into contact with the juvenile justice system; and (C) developing and implementing a work plan that includes measurable objectives for policy, practice, or other system changes, based on the needs identified in the data collection and analysis under subparagraph (B); ; (N) in paragraph (15), as so redesignated— (i) by striking adequate system effective system (ii) by inserting lock-ups, monitoring jails, (iii) by inserting and detention facilities, (iv) by striking , and non-secure facilities (v) by striking insure ensure (vi) by striking requirements of paragraph (11), monitoring to the Administrator core requirements are met, and for annual reporting to the Administrator (vii) by striking , in the opinion of the Administrator, (O) in paragraph (16), as so redesignated, by inserting ethnicity, race, (P) in paragraph (21), as so redesignated, by striking local, local, tribal, (Q) in paragraph (23)— (i) in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), by striking juvenile status offender (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking and (iii) in subparagraph (C)— (I) in clause (i), by striking and (II) in clause (ii), by adding and (III) by adding at the end the following: (iii) if such court determines the status offender should be placed in a secure detention facility or correctional facility for violating such order— (I) the court shall issue a written order that— (aa) identifies the valid court order that has been violated; (bb) specifies the factual basis for determining that there is reasonable cause to believe that the status offender has violated such order; (cc) includes findings of fact to support a determination that there is no appropriate less restrictive alternative available to placing the status offender in such a facility, with due consideration to the best interest of the juvenile; (dd) specifies the length of time, not to exceed 7 days, that the status offender may remain in a secure detention facility or correctional facility, and includes a plan for the status offender's release from such facility; and (ee) may not be renewed or extended; and (II) the court may not issue a second or subsequent order described in subclause (I) relating to a status offender, unless the status offender violates a valid court order after the date on which the court issues an order described in subclause (I); ; and (iv) by adding at the end the following: (D) there are procedures in place to ensure that any status offender held in a secure detention facility or correctional facility pursuant to a court order described in this paragraph does not remain in custody longer than 7 days or the length of time authorized by the court, whichever is shorter; and (E) not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2017 (i) specifies the factual basis to believe that the State has the authority to detain the juvenile under the terms of the Interstate Compact for Juveniles; (ii) includes findings of fact to support a determination that there is no appropriate less restrictive alternative available to placing the juvenile in such a facility, with due consideration to the best interest of the juvenile; (iii) specifies the length of time a juvenile may remain in secure confinement, not to exceed 15 days, and includes a plan for the return of the juvenile to the home State of the juvenile; and (iv) may not be renewed or extended; ; (R) in paragraph (26)— (i) by inserting and in accordance with confidentiality concerns, maximum extent practicable, (ii) by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting the following: “, so as to provide for— (A) data in child abuse or neglect reports relating to juveniles entering the juvenile justice system with a prior reported history of arrest, court intake, probation and parole, juvenile detention, and corrections; and (B) a plan to use the data described in subparagraph (A) to provide necessary services for the treatment of such victims of child abuse or neglect; ; (S) in paragraph (27), as so redesignated, by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and (T) by adding at the end the following: (28) provide for the coordinated use of funds provided under this Act with other Federal and State funds directed at juvenile delinquency prevention and intervention programs; (29) describe the policies, procedures, and training in effect for the staff of juvenile State correctional facilities to eliminate the use of dangerous practices, unreasonable restraints, and unreasonable isolation, including by developing effective behavior management techniques; (30) describe— (A) the evidence-based methods that will be used to conduct mental health and substance abuse screening, assessment, referral, and treatment for juveniles who— (i) request a screening; (ii) show signs of needing a screening; or (iii) are held for a period of more than 24 hours in a secure facility that provides for an initial screening; and (B) how the State will seek, to the extent practicable, to provide or arrange for mental health and substance abuse disorder treatment for juveniles determined to be in need of such treatment; (31) describe how reentry planning by the State for juveniles will include— (A) a written case plan based on an assessment of needs that includes— (i) the pre-release and post-release plans for the juveniles; (ii) the living arrangement to which the juveniles are to be discharged; and (iii) any other plans developed for the juveniles based on an individualized assessment; and (B) review processes; (32) provide that the agency of the State receiving funds under this Act collaborate with the State educational agency receiving assistance under part A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 6311 (A) the student records of adjudicated juveniles, including electronic records if available, are transferred in a timely manner from the educational program in the juvenile detention or secure treatment facility to the educational or training program into which the juveniles will enroll; (B) the credits of adjudicated juveniles are transferred; and (C) adjudicated juveniles receive full or partial credit toward high school graduation for secondary school coursework satisfactorily completed before and during the period of time during which the juveniles are held in custody, regardless of the local educational agency or entity from which the credits were earned; and (33) describe policies and procedures to— (A) screen for, identify, and document in records of the State the identification of victims of domestic human trafficking, or those at risk of such trafficking, upon intake; and (B) divert youth described in subparagraph (A) to appropriate programs or services, to the extent practicable. ; (2) in subsection (d)— (A) by striking described in paragraphs (11), (12), (13), and (21) of subsection (a) described in the core requirements (B) by striking the requirements under paragraphs (11), (12), (13), and (21) of subsection (a) the core requirements (3) in subsection (f)(2)— (A) by striking subparagraph (A); and (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) through (E) and subparagraphs (A) through (D), respectively; and (4) by adding at the end the following: (g) Compliance Determination (1) In general For each fiscal year, the Administrator shall make a determination regarding whether each State receiving a grant under this Act is in compliance or out of compliance with respect to each of the core requirements. (2) Reporting The Administrator shall— (A) issue an annual public report— (i) describing any determination described in paragraph (1) made during the previous year, including a summary of the information on which the determination is based and the actions to be taken by the Administrator (including a description of any reduction imposed under subsection (c)); and (ii) for any such determination that a State is out of compliance with any of the core requirements, describing the basis for the determination; and (B) make the report described in subparagraph (A) available on a publicly available website. (3) Determinations required The Administrator may not— (A) determine that a State is not out of compliance (B) otherwise fail to make the compliance determinations required under paragraph (1). . 206. Reallocation of grant funds Section 223(c) of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5633(c) (c) (1) If a State fails to comply with any of the core requirements in any fiscal year, then— (A) subject to subparagraph (B), the amount allocated to such State under section 222 for the subsequent fiscal year shall be reduced by not less than 20 percent for each core requirement with respect to which the failure occurs; and (B) the State shall be ineligible to receive any allocation under such section for such fiscal year unless— (i) the State agrees to expend 50 percent of the amount allocated to the State for such fiscal year to achieve compliance with any such paragraph with respect to which the State is in noncompliance; or (ii) the Administrator determines that the State— (I) has achieved substantial compliance with such applicable requirements with respect to which the State was not in compliance; and (II) has made, through appropriate executive or legislative action, an unequivocal commitment to achieving full compliance with such applicable requirements within a reasonable time. (2) Of the total amount of funds not allocated for a fiscal year under paragraph (1)— (A) 50 percent of the unallocated funds shall be reallocated under section 222 to States that have not failed to comply with the core requirements; and (B) 50 percent of the unallocated funds shall be used by the Administrator to provide additional training and technical assistance to States for the purpose of promoting compliance with the core requirements. . 207. Authority to make grants Section 241(a) of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5651(a) (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting status offenders, juvenile offenders, and juveniles (2) in paragraph (2)(A), by inserting before the semicolon at the end the following: , including for truancy prevention and reduction and social and independent living skills development (3) in paragraph (4), by striking State, State, tribal, (4) in paragraph (5), by striking juvenile offenders and juveniles status offenders, juvenile offenders, and juveniles (5) in paragraph (10), by inserting , including juveniles with disabilities 208. Eligibility of States Section 243(a)(1)(A) of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5653(a)(1)(A) 5 10 209. Grants to Indian tribes Section 246(a)(2) of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5656(a)(2) (1) by striking subparagraph (A); (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) through (E) as subparagraphs (A) through (D), respectively; and (3) in subparagraph (B)(ii), as redesignated, by striking subparagraph (B) subparagraph (A) 210. Research and evaluation; statistical analyses; information dissemination Section 251 of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5661 (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) in the matter proceeding subparagraph (A), by striking may shall (ii) in subparagraph (A), by striking plan and identify annually publish a plan to identify (iii) in subparagraph (B)— (I) by striking clause (iii) and inserting the following: (iii) successful efforts to prevent status offenders and first-time minor offenders from subsequent involvement with the juvenile justice and criminal justice systems; ; (II) by striking clause (vii) and inserting the following: (vii) the prevalence and duration of behavioral health needs (including mental health, substance abuse, and co-occurring disorders) among juveniles pre-placement and post-placement when held in the custody of secure detention and corrections facilities, including an examination of the effects of confinement; ; (III) by redesignating clauses (ix), (x), and (xi) as clauses (xv), (xvi), and (xvii), respectively; and (IV) by inserting after clause (viii) the following: (ix) training efforts and reforms that have produced reductions in or elimination of the use of dangerous practices; (x) methods to improve the recruitment, selection, training, and retention of professional personnel who are focused on the prevention, identification, and treatment of delinquency; (xi) methods to improve the identification and response to victims of domestic child sex trafficking within the juvenile justice system; (xii) identifying positive outcome measures, such as attainment of employment and educational degrees, that States and units of local government should use to evaluate the success of programs aimed at reducing recidivism of youth who have come in contact with the juvenile justice system or criminal justice system; (xiii) evaluating the impact and outcomes of the prosecution and sentencing of juveniles as adults; (xiv) successful and cost-effective efforts by States and units of local government to reduce recidivism through policies that provide for consideration of appropriate alternative sanctions to incarceration of youth facing nonviolent charges, while ensuring that public safety is preserved; ; and (B) in paragraph (4)— (i) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking date of enactment of this paragraph, the date of enactment of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2017 (ii) in subparagraph (D), by inserting and Indian tribes State (iii) in subparagraph (F), by striking and (iv) in subparagraph (G), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and (v) by adding at the end the following: (H) a description of the best practices in discharge planning; and (I) an assessment of living arrangements for juveniles who, upon release from confinement in a State correctional facility, cannot return to the residence they occupied prior to such confinement. ; (2) in subsection (b), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking may shall (3) by adding at the end the following: (f) National recidivism measure The Administrator, in consultation with experts in the field of juvenile justice research, recidivism, and data collection, shall— (1) establish a uniform method of data collection and technology that States may use to evaluate data on juvenile recidivism on an annual basis; (2) establish a common national juvenile recidivism measurement system; and (3) make cumulative juvenile recidivism data that is collected from States available to the public. (g) GAO review Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2017 (1) an examination of the extent of Indian youth involvement in the juvenile justice system, including the number of Indian youth in Federal, State, or tribal custody or detention for offenses committed while under the age of 18; (2) a description of the unique barriers faced by Indian tribes in providing adequate services to rehabilitate youth who have been adjudicated as delinquent; and (3) recommendations to improve effectiveness of prevention and treatment services for Indian youth who may come into contact with the juvenile justice system. . 211. Training and technical assistance Section 252 of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5662 (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking may (B) in paragraph (1)— (i) by inserting shall develop and carry out projects (ii) by striking and (C) in paragraph (2)— (i) by inserting may make grants to and contracts with (ii) by striking the period and inserting ; and (D) by adding at the end the following: (3) shall provide periodic training for States regarding implementation of the core requirements, current protocols and best practices for achieving and monitoring compliance, and information sharing regarding relevant Office resources on evidence-based and promising programs or practices that promote the purposes of this Act. ; (2) in subsection (b)— (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking may (B) in paragraph (1)— (i) by inserting shall develop and implement projects (ii) by inserting , including compliance with the core requirements this title (iii) by striking and (C) in paragraph (2)— (i) by inserting may make grants to and contracts with (ii) by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and (D) by adding at the end the following: (3) shall provide technical assistance to States and units of local government on achieving compliance with the amendments to the core requirements and State Plans made by the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2017 (4) shall provide technical assistance to States in support of efforts to establish partnerships between a State and a university, institution of higher education, or research center designed to improve the recruitment, selection, training, and retention of professional personnel in the fields of medicine, law enforcement, the judiciary, juvenile justice, social work and child protection, education, and other relevant fields who are engaged in, or intend to work in, the field of prevention, identification, and treatment of delinquency. ; (3) in subsection (c)— (A) by inserting prosecutors, public defenders, (B) by inserting status offenders and needs of (4) by adding at the end the following: (d) Technical assistance to States regarding legal representation of children In consultation with experts in the field of juvenile defense, the Administrator shall— (1) develop and issue standards of practice for attorneys representing children; and (2) ensure that the standards issued under paragraph (1) are adapted for use in States. (e) Training and technical assistance for local and State juvenile detention and corrections personnel The Administrator shall coordinate training and technical assistance programs with juvenile detention and corrections personnel of States and units of local government to— (1) promote methods for improving conditions of juvenile confinement, including methods that are designed to minimize the use of dangerous practices, unreasonable restraints, and isolation; and (2) encourage alternative behavior management techniques based on positive youth development approaches. (f) Training and technical assistance To support mental health or substance abuse treatment including home-Based or community-Based care The Administrator shall provide training and technical assistance, in conjunction with the appropriate public agencies, to individuals involved in making decisions regarding the disposition and management of cases for youth who enter the juvenile justice system about the appropriate services and placement for youth with mental health or substance abuse needs, including— (1) juvenile justice intake personnel; (2) probation officers; (3) juvenile court judges and court services personnel; (4) prosecutors and court-appointed counsel; and (5) family members of juveniles and family advocates. (g) Grants for juvenile court judges and personnel The Attorney General, acting through the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention and the Office of Justice Programs, shall make grants to improve training, education, technical assistance, evaluation, and research to enhance the capacity of State and local courts, judges, and related judicial personnel to— (1) improve the lives of children currently involved in or at risk of being involved in the juvenile court system; and (2) carry out the requirements of this Act. (h) Free and reduced price school lunches for incarcerated juveniles The Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture, shall provide guidance to States relating to existing options for school food authorities in the States to apply for reimbursement for free or reduced price lunches under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1751 . 212. Administrative authority Section 299A of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5672 (1) in subsection (d)— (A) by inserting (1) The Administrator (B) by striking , after appropriate consultation with representatives of States and units of local government, (C) by inserting guidance, regulations, (D) by adding at the end the following: “In developing guidance and procedures, the Administrator shall consult with representatives of States and units of local government, including those individuals responsible for administration of this Act and compliance with the core requirements. (2) The Administrator shall ensure that— (A) reporting, compliance reporting, State plan requirements, and other similar documentation as may be required from States is requested in a manner that encourages efficiency and reduces the duplication of reporting efforts; and (B) States meeting all the core requirements are encouraged to experiment with offering innovative, data-driven programs designed to further improve the juvenile justice system. ; and (2) in subsection (e), by striking requirements described in paragraphs (11), (12), and (13) of section 223(a) core requirements III Incentive grants for local delinquency prevention programs 301. Definitions Section 502 of the Incentive Grants for Local Delinquency Prevention Programs Act of 2002 ( 42 U.S.C. 5781 (1) in the section heading, by striking Definition Definitions (2) by striking this title, the term (1) the term mentoring (2) the term . 302. Grants for delinquency prevention programs Section 504(a) of the Incentive Grants for Local Delinquency Prevention Programs Act of 2002 ( 42 U.S.C. 5783(a) (1) in paragraph (7), by striking and (2) in paragraph (8), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (9) mentoring, parent training and support, or in-home family services programs, if such programs are evidence-based or promising. . 303. Technical and conforming amendment The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 is amended by striking title V, as added by the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( Public Law 93–415 IV Miscellaneous provisions 401. Evaluation by Government Accountability Office (a) Evaluation Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall— (1) conduct a comprehensive analysis and evaluation regarding the performance of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (referred to in this section as the agency (2) conduct a comprehensive audit and evaluation of a selected, sample of grantees (as determined by the Comptroller General) that receive Federal funds under grant programs administered by the agency including a review of internal controls (as defined in section 103 of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5603 (3) submit a report in accordance with subsection (d). (b) Considerations for evaluation In conducting the analysis and evaluation under subsection (a)(1), and in order to document the efficiency and public benefit of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5601 42 U.S.C. 5701 42 U.S.C. 5771 (1) the outcome and results of the programs carried out by the agency and those programs administered through grants by the agency; (2) the extent to which the agency has complied with the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 ( Public Law 103–62 (3) the extent to which the jurisdiction of, and the programs administered by, the agency duplicate or conflict with the jurisdiction and programs of other agencies; (4) the potential benefits of consolidating programs administered by the agency with similar or duplicative programs of other agencies, and the potential for consolidating those programs; (5) whether less restrictive or alternative methods exist to carry out the functions of the agency and whether current functions or operations are impeded or enhanced by existing statutes, rules, and procedures; (6) the number and types of beneficiaries or persons served by programs carried out by the agency; (7) the manner with which the agency seeks public input and input from State and local governments on the performance of the functions of the agency; (8) the extent to which the agency complies with section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the Freedom of Information Act); (9) whether greater oversight is needed of programs developed with grants made by the agency; and (10) the extent to which changes are necessary in the authorizing statutes of the agency in order for the functions of the agency to be performed in a more efficient and effective manner. (c) Considerations for audits In conducting the audit and evaluation under subsection (a)(2), and in order to document the efficiency and public benefit of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5601 42 U.S.C. 5701 42 U.S.C. 5771 (1) whether grantees timely file Financial Status Reports; (2) whether grantees have sufficient internal controls to ensure adequate oversight of grant fund received; (3) whether disbursements were accompanied with adequate supporting documentation (including invoices and receipts); (4) whether expenditures were authorized; (5) whether subrecipients of grant funds were complying with program requirements; (6) whether salaries and fringe benefits of personnel were adequately supported by documentation; (7) whether contracts were bid in accordance with program guidelines; and (8) whether grant funds were spent in accordance with program goals and guidelines. (d) Report (1) In general Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall— (A) submit a report regarding the evaluation conducted under subsection (a) and audit under subsection (b), to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate; and (B) make the report described in subparagraph (A) available to the public. (2) Contents The report submitted in accordance with paragraph (1) shall include all audit findings determined by the selected, statistically significant sample of grantees as required by subsection (a)(2) and shall include the name and location of any selected grantee as well as any findings required by subsection (a)(2). 402. Authorization of appropriations (a) In general The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5601 VI Authorization of appropriations; accountability and oversight 601. Authorization of appropriations (a) In general There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act— (1) $160,000,000 for fiscal year 2017; (2) $162,400,000 for fiscal year 2018; (3) $164,836,000 for fiscal year 2019; (4) $167,308,540 for fiscal year 2020; and (5) $169,818,168 for fiscal year 2021. (b) Mentoring programs Not more than 20 percent of the amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) for a fiscal year may be used for mentoring programs. . (b) Technical and conforming amendments The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 is amended by striking— (1) section 299 ( 42 U.S.C. 5671 (2) section 388 ( 42 U.S.C. 5751 (3) section 408 ( 42 U.S.C. 5777 (4) section 505 ( 42 U.S.C. 5784 403. Accountability and oversight (a) In general Title VI of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974, as added by this Act, is amended by adding at the end the following: 602. Accountability and oversight (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that, in order to ensure that at-risk youth and youth who come into contact with the juvenile justice system or the criminal justice system are treated fairly and the outcome of that contact is beneficial to the Nation— (1) the Department of Justice, through its Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, must restore meaningful enforcement of the core requirements in this Act; (2) the Attorney General should, not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, issue a proposed rule to update existing Federal regulations used to make State compliance determinations and provide participating States with technical assistance to develop more effective and comprehensive data collection systems; and (3) States, which are entrusted with a fiscal stewardship role if they accept funds under this Act, must exercise vigilant oversight to ensure full compliance with the core requirements for juveniles provided for in this Act. (b) Accountability (1) Agency program review (A) Programmatic and financial assessment (i) In general Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Director of the Office of Audit, Assessment, and Management of the Office of Justice Programs at the Department of Justice (referred to in this section as the Director (I) conduct a comprehensive analysis and evaluation of the internal controls of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (referred to in this section as the agency (aa) supporting doc­u­men­ta­tion was not provided for cost reports; (bb) unauthorized expenditures occurred; and (cc) subrecipients of grant funds were not compliance with program requirements; (II) conduct a comprehensive audit and evaluation of a selected statistically significant sample of States and Indian tribes (as determined by the Director) that have received Federal funds under this Act, including a review of internal controls to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse of funds by grantees; (III) submit a report in accordance with clause (iv). (ii) Considerations for evaluations In conducting the analysis and evaluation under clause (i)(I), and in order to document the efficiency and public benefit of this Act, excluding the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act and the Missing Children's Assistance Act, the Director shall take into consideration the extent to which— (I) greater oversight is needed of programs developed with grants made by the agency; (II) changes are necessary in the authorizing statutes of the agency in order that the functions of the agency can be performed in a more efficient and effective manner; and (III) the agency has implemented recommendations issued by the Comptroller General or Office of Inspector General relating to the grant making and grant monitoring responsibilities of the agency. (iii) Considerations for audits In conducting the audit and evaluation under clause (i)(II), and in order to document the efficiency and public benefit of this Act, excluding the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act and the Missing Children's Assistance Act, the Director shall take into consideration— (I) whether grantees timely file Financial Status Reports; (II) whether grantees have sufficient internal controls to ensure adequate oversight of grant funds received; (III) whether grantees’ assertions of compliance with the core requirements were accompanied with adequate supporting documentation; (IV) whether expenditures were authorized; (V) whether subrecipients of grant funds were complying with program requirements; and (VI) whether grant funds were spent in accordance with the program goals and guidelines. (iv) Report The Director shall submit to Congress a report outlining the results of the analysis, evaluation, and audit conducted under clause (i), including supporting materials, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate and shall make such report available to the public online, not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section. (B) Analysis of internal controls (i) In general Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Administrator shall initiate a comprehensive analysis and evaluation of the internal controls of the agency to determine whether, and to what extent, States and Indian tribes that receive grants under this Act are following the requirements of the grant programs authorized under this Act. (ii) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Administrator shall submit to Congress a report containing— (I) the findings of the analysis and evaluation conducted under clause (i); (II) a description of remedial actions, if any, that will be taken by the Administrator to enhance the internal controls of the agency and recoup funds that may have been expended in violation of law, regulations, or program requirements issued under this Act; and (III) a description of— (aa) the analysis conducted under clause (i); (bb) whether the funds awarded under this Act have been used in accordance with law, regulations, program guidance, and applicable plans; and (cc) the extent to which funds awarded to States and Indian tribes under this Act enhanced the ability of grantees to fulfill the core requirements. (C) Report by the Attorney General Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Attorney General shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the estimated amount of grant funds disbursed by the agency since fiscal year 2010 that did not meet the requirements for awards of formula grants to States under this Act. (2) Office of Inspector General performance audits (A) In general In order to ensure the effective and appropriate use of grants administered under this Act and to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse of funds by grantees, the Inspector General of the Department of Justice each year shall periodically conduct audits of States and Indian tribes that receive grants under this Act. (B) Determining samples The sample selected for audits under subparagraph (A) shall be— (i) of an appropriate size to— (I) assess the grant programs authorized under this Act; and (II) act as a deterrent to financial mismanagement; and (ii) selected based on— (I) the size of the grants awarded to the recipient; (II) the past grant management performance of the recipient; (III) concerns identified by the Administrator, including referrals from the Administrator; and (IV) such other factors as determined by the Inspector General of the Department of Justice. (C) Public availability on website The Attorney General shall make the summary of each review conducted under this section available on the website of the Department of Justice, subject to redaction as the Attorney General determines necessary to protect classified and other sensitive information. (D) Mandatory exclusion A recipient of grant funds under this Act that is found to have an unresolved audit finding shall not be eligible to receive grant funds under this Act during the first 2 fiscal years beginning after the 12-month period beginning on the date on which the audit report is issued. (E) Priority In awarding grants under this Act, the Administrator shall give priority to a State or Indian tribe that did not have an unresolved audit finding during the 3 fiscal years prior to the date on which the eligible entity submits an application for a grant under this Act. (F) Reimbursement If a State or Indian tribe is awarded grant funds under this Act during the 2-fiscal-year period in which the entity is barred from receiving grants under subparagraph (I), the Attorney General shall— (i) deposit an amount equal to the amount of the grant funds that were improperly awarded to the grantee into the General Fund of the Treasury; and (ii) seek to recoup the costs of the repayment to the General Fund under clause (i) from the grantee that was erroneously awarded grant funds. (G) Definition In this paragraph, the term unresolved audit finding (i) that the audited State or Indian tribe has used grant funds for an unauthorized expenditure or otherwise unallowable cost; and (ii) that is not closed or resolved during the 12-month period beginning on the date on which the final audit report is issued. (3) Nonprofit organization requirements (A) Definition For purposes of this paragraph and the grant programs described in this Act, the term nonprofit organization section 501(c)(3) (B) Prohibition The Administrator may not award a grant under any grant program described in this Act to a nonprofit organization that holds money in offshore accounts for the purpose of avoiding paying the tax described in section 511(a) (C) Disclosure (i) In general Each nonprofit organization that is awarded a grant under a grant program described in this Act and uses the procedures prescribed in regulations to create a rebuttable presumption of reasonableness for the compensation of its officers, directors, trustees, and key employees, shall disclose to the Administrator, in the application for the grant, the process for determining such compensation, including— (I) the independent persons involved in reviewing and approving such compensation; (II) the comparability data used; and (III) contemporaneous substantiation of the deliberation and decision. (ii) Public inspection upon request Upon request, the Administrator shall make the information disclosed under clause (i) available for public inspection. (4) Conference expenditures (A) Limitation No amounts authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Justice under this Act may be used by the Attorney General, or by any individual or organization awarded discretionary funds through a cooperative agreement under this Act, to host or support any expenditure for conferences that uses more than $20,000 in funds made available to the Department of Justice, unless the Deputy Attorney General or such Assistant Attorney Generals, Directors, or principal deputies as the Deputy Attorney General may designate, provides prior written authorization that the funds may be expended to host a conference. (B) Written approval Written approval under subparagraph (A) shall include a written estimate of all costs associated with the conference, including the cost of all food and beverages, audiovisual equipment, honoraria for speakers, and entertainment. (C) Report The Deputy Attorney General shall submit an annual report to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives on all conference expenditures approved under this paragraph. (5) Prohibition on lobbying activity (A) In general Amounts authorized to be appropriated under this Act may not be utilized by any recipient of a grant made using such amounts to— (i) lobby any representative of the Department of Justice regarding the award of grant funding; or (ii) lobby any representative of a Federal, State, local, or tribal government regarding the award of grant funding. (B) Penalty If the Attorney General determines that any recipient of a grant made using amounts authorized to be appropriated under this Act has violated subparagraph (A), the Attorney General shall— (i) require the grant recipient to repay the grant in full; and (ii) prohibit the grant recipient from receiving another grant under this Act for not less than 5 years. (6) Annual certification Beginning in the first fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of this section, the Attorney General shall submit, to the Committee on the Judiciary and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, an annual certification that— (A) all audits issued by the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Justice under paragraph (2) have been completed and reviewed by the appropriate Assistant Attorney General or Director; (B) all mandatory exclusions required under paragraph (2)(I) have been issued; (C) all reimbursements required under paragraph (2)(K)(i) have been made; and (D) includes a list of any grant recipients excluded under paragraph (2)(I) during the preceding fiscal year. (c) Preventing duplicative grants (1) In general Before the Attorney General awards a grant to an applicant under this Act, the Attorney General shall compare potential grant awards with other grants awarded under this Act to determine if duplicate grant awards are awarded for the same purpose. (2) Report If the Attorney General awards duplicate grants to the same applicant for the same purpose the Attorney General shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives a report that includes— (A) a list of all duplicate grants awarded, including the total dollar amount of any duplicate grants awarded; and (B) the reason the Attorney General awarded the duplicative grant. (d) Compliance with auditing standards The Administrator shall comply with the Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards, published by the General Accountability Office (commonly known as the Yellow Book . (b) Technical and conforming amendment (1) In general The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 is amended by striking section 407 ( 42 U.S.C. 5776a (2) Effective date The amendment made by paragraph (1) shall take effect on the first day of the first fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of this Act. (3) Savings clause In the case of an entity that is barred from receiving grant funds under paragraph (2) or (7)(B)(ii) of section 407 of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5776a V Juvenile accountability block grants 501. Grant eligibility Section 1802(a) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 ( 42 U.S.C. 3796ee–2(a) (1) in paragraph (1), by striking and (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (3) assurances that the State agrees to comply with the core requirements, as defined in section 103 of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5603 .

Summary: Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2017 TITLE I--DECLARATION OF PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS (Sec. 101) This bill amends the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 (JJDPA) to modify the Act's purpose areas. It revises an existing purpose area to require the Department of Justice's (DOJ's) Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), in disseminating information on juvenile delinquency prevention programs, to promote evidence-based programs and practices. It also adds, as a new purpose area, support for a continuum of evidence-based or promising programs that are trauma-informed, reflect the science of adolescent development, and are designed to meet the needs of at-risk youth who come into contact with the juvenile justice system. TITLE II--JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVENTION (Sec. 201) The bill requires the OJJDP, in developing objectives, priorities, strategies, and long-term plans, to take into account scientific knowledge regarding: (1) adolescent development and behavior, and (2) the effects of delinquency prevention programs and juvenile justice interventions on adolescents. The OJJDP, in consultation with Indian tribes, must develop a policy to collaborate with representatives of Indian tribes with a criminal justice function to implement the provisions of this bill relating to Indian tribes. (Sec. 202) It expands membership on the Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (Coordinating Council) to include the Administrator of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and the Secretary of the Interior. (Sec. 203) This section modifies requirements for the OJJDP's annual report on juveniles in custody. Specifically, it adds ethnicity to the list of offender characteristics and expands the categories of information that must be summarized and analyzed. It adds requirements for the annual report to describe criteria used to determine what programs qualify as evidence-based and promising programs and funding provided to Indian tribes; and to analyze and evaluate the OJJDP's internal controls and the total amount of payments recouped from grantees that violate the OJJDP's policies and procedures. (Sec. 204) It increases from 2% to 5% the maximum amount of Formula Grant funds that may be used to provide technical assistance to states in complying with the core requirements and implementing a juvenile justice and delinquency plan. It increases each state's minimum allocation under the population-based Formula Grant program from $325,000 to $400,000 if the title II appropriation is less than $75 million in a fiscal year. A state's relative population of individuals under 18 years of age must be based on the most recent U.S. Census Bureau data. The 10% maximum amount of a state's Formula Grant allocation that can be used for planning and administration includes designation of at least one individual to coordinate and certify compliance with the core requirements. (Sec. 205) This section modifies the required components of a state's juvenile justice and delinquency plan. A state's annual update to the three-year plan must describe how the plan is supported by and takes account of scientific knowledge regarding adolescent development and behavior and regarding the effects of prevention programs and juvenile justice interventions. A state must post its plan or amended plan on a publicly accessible website. The bill modifies State Advisory Group membership qualifications to include representatives of public agencies that prevent or treat mental health, substance abuse, or disabilities in adolescents; volunteers who work as court-appointed legal counsel for juveniles; and individuals who represent victim or witness advocacy groups. It also increases from 24 years to 28 years the maximum age of youth members at the time of appointment. It eliminates the requirement for an eligible Indian tribe to perform law enforcement functions. A state's juvenile justice and delinquency plan must contain additional components, including plans to: provide alternatives to detention, reduce children in secure detention and corrections facilities, engage family members, use community-based services, promote evidence-based and trauma-informed programs and practices, and limit the use of restraints on pregnant juvenile offenders. The bill modifies program areas under the Formula Grant program. It revises existing program areas to specify that: (1) educational programs and support services include projects to prevent and reduce truancy; and (2) the scope of juveniles served by mentoring, counseling, and training programs includes juveniles whose parent or guardian is incarcerated in a tribal facility. It adds new program areas to expand access to legal counsel, to inform juveniles of the opportunity and process for expunging juvenile records, to address the needs of at-risk girls, and to monitor compliance and provide technical assistance with the core requirements. The bill prioritizes funding for entities that meet the criteria for evidence-based or promising programs. The bill modifies the core requirements with which a state must comply to receive a full allocation of funds under the Formula Grant program. First, it revises the deinstitutionalization of status offenders core requirement, which prohibits the secure detention or confinement of a juvenile who commits a status offense (i.e., an offense that would not be a crime if committed by an adult). Specifically, use of the valid court order exception to securely detain or confine a juvenile status offender must comply with additional requirements, such as issuance of a court order and a seven-day maximum length of detention. Second, it modifies the separation and jail removal core requirements to specify that sight or sound contact is the level of contact prohibited between juveniles and adults. Sight or sound contact means any physical, clear visual, or verbal contact that is not brief or inadvertent. Third, it revises the disproportionate minority contact requirement to require a state to implement policy, practice, and system improvement strategies to identify and reduce racial and ethnic disparities among youth who come into contact with the juvenile justice system. It retains the prohibition against using numerical standards or quotas. A state must provide for an effective (previously, adequate) system of monitoring compliance with the core requirements. The OJJDP must annually conduct, and publish the results of, a compliance determination for each state that participates in the Formula Grant program. (Sec. 206) Formula Grant program funds that are unallocated due to the failure of states to comply with core requirements must be reallocated equally among compliant states and the OJJDP. (Sec. 207) The bill modifies certain purpose areas of the Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Block Grant program to specify that: (1) the scope of juveniles served by comprehensive juvenile justice and delinquency prevention projects includes juveniles with disabilities, (2) educational projects to prevent juvenile delinquency include projects to prevent and reduce truancy and to develop social and independent living skills, and (3) the scope of juveniles served by treatment projects and community-based projects and services includes status offenders. (Sec. 208) It increases from 5% to 10% the maximum amount of a Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Block Grant that a state may use for administration, evaluation, and technical assistance. (Sec. 209) It eliminates the requirement for an eligible Indian tribe to provide, in an application for a Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Block Grant allocation, evidence that it performs law enforcement functions. (Sec. 210) This section requires (currently, authorizes) the OJJDP to annually publish a plan to identify (currently, plan and identify) the purposes and goals of funded initiatives to research and evaluate juvenile justice matters. It revises and expands the list of juvenile justice matters initiatives. The OJJDP must study the coordination of services and treatment between the juvenile justice and child welfare systems. It must describe best practices in discharge planning and assess post-confinement living arrangements of juveniles who cannot return home. This bill directs (currently, authorizes) the OJJDP to analyze juvenile justice statistics. The OJJDP must, with respect to juvenile recidivism data, establish a uniform collection method, establish a common measurement system, and publish cumulative data collected by states. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) must review available research conducted by federal agencies and entities related to Indian youth who come into contact with the juvenile justice system. (Sec. 211) It requires (currently, permits) the OJJDP to provide training, technical assistance, and information dissemination. It adds requirements for the OJJDP to provide: training to states to implement the JJDPA's core requirements, current protocols and best practices for achieving monitoring compliance, and information sharing regarding evidence-based and promising programs or practices. It adds requirements for the OJJDP to provide technical assistance to state and local governments to comply with amendments to the core requirements and state plans; and to improve recruitment, selection, training, and retention of juvenile justice professionals. Finally, the OJJDP must develop standards of practice for attorneys representing children; coordinate training and technical assistance programs for local and state juvenile detention and corrections personnel; provide training and technical assistance with respect to appropriate services and placement for youth with mental health or substance abuse needs; and make grants for juvenile court judges and judicial personnel. (Sec. 212) The OJJDP must, in developing guidance and procedures, consult state and local governments. TITLE III--INCENTIVE GRANTS FOR LOCAL DELINQUENCY PREVENTION PROGRAMS (Sec. 301) This section adds a definition for the term &quot;mentoring.&quot; (Sec. 302) It broadens the authorized grant purposes under the Incentive Grants for Local Delinquency Prevention Programs to include evidence-based or promising programs on mentoring, parent training and support, or in-home family services. TITLE IV--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS (Sec. 401) The GAO must evaluate the OJJDP's performance and audit selected grant recipients. (Sec. 402) The bill amends the JJDPA to add a new title: that reauthorizes through FY2021 programs under the JJDPA; that expresses the sense of Congress that the OJJDP must restore meaningful enforcement of, and states must ensure full compliance with, the core requirements; that subjects juvenile justice grants to accountability provisions; and that requires DOJ to identify and report on duplicative grant awards. TITLE V--JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILITY BLOCK GRANTS (Sec. 501) This section amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to condition a state's receipt of funds under the Juvenile Accountability Block Grant program on compliance with the core requirements of the JJDPA applicable to the detention and confinement of juveniles.