Who the hell are you to decide who is notable, you ABSOLUTELY UNHEARD OF , BLITHERING NOBODY?

You invited me to edit a page and I did, so it is NOT "DISRUPTION"!  If you don;t want it edited, DON'T MAKE IT EDITABLE!

My notability is verifiable on the Web, and off.  I cited STARRRING in a  American/Canadian film, in the very famous  "Amityville" series, and am noted in many places on the Web as its star.

I also cited several a major North American newspaper, the Montreal Gazette (founded by Benjamin Franklin, and the largest English language daily west of Toronto).  You were also told that I have been a critic for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (but YOU wouldn't know what that is, you ignorant AMERICAN, WOULD YOU?).

I ALSO HAVE NUMEROUS OTHER MAJOR CREDITS, BUT HAVE NOT LISTED THEM.

Obviously, you are discriminating against prominent Canadians, because you can't be bothered doiong researching outside of the Internet, or your own, self-important *&*^$%ng country.  

MY article was DISRUPTED by an "editor" who admits she, herself, was cautioned by Wikipedia.

Here's some news for you, *BInky*:  Wikipedia is so "notable" it is NOT EVEN LISTED in the Britannica 2007.

Here's some more news: School children, EVERYWHERE, are warned of the general unreliability of Wikipedia, and so they should be, because it is run by wannabe editors like you, who can't find editing work outside of the virtual world.

Now, go collect your unemployment cheque (or "check", for ignorant rabble like yourself), and buzz the hell off.

G.F.Y.!

Toxicity label: other