:Okay, you want trouble. We have a problem on 4 accounts.

1. You delete information out of disconcern without even TRYING to look for sources yourself.

2. Even dumber, you personally deliver a provacative message to the person who typed the information.

3. You brought up those stupid wikipedia policies as if I'm fucking retard that doesn't know the rules. Honestly, who do you think you're fooling?

4. You brought the unpopular/unfathomable name, "Jason Anthony Griffith" to my talk page which really pisses me off. It's not enough that someone would pull something so stupid as to try to start shit by deleting the info someone types themselves and going to their talk page to gloat about it. 

What the hell are you, some kind of amature? Wikipedia is for people concerned with adding the real facts and nothing but that. Not deleting info and not even giving back more or less HALF as much as what you took away.
We don't need shit like this.
The only reason you absolutely require a source instead of taking the word of the people THEN trying to hide behind wikipedia's stupid policies is because you just want the article to look clean. Well stand by for news, the truth isn't clean and orderly. It doesn't have to be. The one this is all about doesn't agree with the information that WILL still be up? Let Jason Anthony Griffith take it down himself. If not, the truth STAYS up. I don't care what you try and say.

And those sources ARE good enough for that paragraph. Don't delete, try editting. An artivle doesn't need all sources to be deemed accurate.   


Toxicity label: other