this is stupid. i defent the actions of User:Cerejota in Talk:Digg and then User:Krimpet threatens to ban me. i then post in Talk:Digg that the cost of defending User:Cerejota is banning and then User:Leki and User:Android Mouse threaten to ban me, too. User:Android Mouse also reverts my changes. so i harass them back. was there a more proper warning i should have made against User:Leki? probably, but i don't know what it is.

but then  in general". WP:AGF!!! i don't see how i was ever uncivil. the one example User:Krimpet provides is bogus. that was intended as a joke and if you can't take it as a joke, that's your problem. it certainly isn't worthy of a ban.

i'd post this on your talk page, User:Krimpet, but because of the ban, i can only post on mine. so i hope you read my talk page and apologize. apologize and make User:Leki and User:Android Mouse do the same. either that or you should step down because you are clearly a disgrace to wikipedia.

oh, sry. my saying you're a disgrace to wikipedia violates WP:CIVIL, doesn't it? maybe you should have thought of that before you violated WP:CIVIL, yourself, and threatened to ban me. and perhaps User:Leki and User:Android Mouse should have thought of that, too. you can't expect civility when the people you're engaging in friendly debate with try to subvert your arguments by banning you or deleting them, all together. that i've been civil up to know is pretty amazing and i should be commended for it - not banned for it.

Toxicity label: other