The article stinks; I have said so. It has been written from an extreme and disputable point of view, from two sources which share it, on a subject on which there are innumerable sources of other points of view; it contains statements which can only be explained as partisanship or ignorance.   That is not uncivil; it is a defense - and the only defense - against Wikipedia being  publicly embarassed. 

It would be regrettable if your involvement in the same Wikiproject, or the same nationality, were to create a cabal to defend bad work.  PMAnderson

Toxicity label: other