First of all SarekOfVulcan still did not get back to me to disscus "civilized". Instead NotARealWord added some non-sense. It seems that this is your style, how many, 3-5 editors keep moving around "replying" to me. Anyway I CANNOT BELIEVE MY EYES READING WHAT NotARealWord just wrote above. 
NotARealWord said, quote "What do you mean? The statement about their "100% clean award" is cited." Are you for real, or you want to insult my/users’ intelligence? What, you have another set of policies about reliable sources and self promotion means? WHO MADE THAT STATEMENT ABOUT 100% CLEAN AWARD? Can you answer me SAREKofVULCAN? My feeling is that the guy from Softpedia entered that...what a reliable source. Secondly, what does it means "100% clean AWARED"? Is this “award” given by a reliable, verifiable source/body/entity, maybe Golden Globes? NO, that comes from the same "reliable source", softpedia. And 3r, THIS IS PROOF THAT AMOUNG this team of editors that are against me, are some like (NotARealWord) which is (SAREK here is another personal attack according to your definition) or in a hurry to close my mouth, or just incompetent. 

Here is my proof;  NotARealWord said "the statement about their "100% clean award" is cited". 

And read what is on the page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Softpedia)now: "programs which are also freeware or open source are given Softpedia's "100% Free" award.[4][non-primary source needed]"

Where is your non-primary source SAREK and Wikipedia and David Biddulph (David added this "fault pas" in NotARealWord's name)
? 
Regarding the 2nd point that I did not insert a name of a reliable source, we debated that, I inserted more sources but none is for you guys (I will start to differentiate between you, editors, and Wikipedia, in my naiveté, I still want to believe that how you act is not actually Wikipedia's way to work) a reliable one.  

Conclusion: my belief is that (I cannot pinpoint) or/and there is a matter of incompetence from the editor's part, some Wikipedia/Softpedia interests or just a vendetta.

I still hope to hear from you SAREK, to discuss this points “civilized” (I think, I am doing my part buy you don’t do yours). 

Picard out.     

Toxicity label: other