"Years after Hanson's death, will her biographer sit down and include this incident and her reaction? I've written articles on Australian historical figures—from the left and the right—and I don't include petty bullshit like this." Further point is that it is irrelevant to her entire life and career. So many Wikipedia articles aren't a proper biography, they're "slap" from this media article, and "slap" from that media article; based on the idea that it was said, or done, so it must be there (irrelevant of how petty or non-notable it is). It's why articles on modern-day 'extremists', whatever their creed, are so bad: because they're just conduits for media crap. (i.e. Something negative was said about the person at hand, so it therefore must be slapped in the article; this is done under the guise of it being "notable", but it is, in reality, just an editor taking an oppourtunity to attack the person at hand.)

Do not think I'm blind. I see through the bullshit, whether it comes from you or the media. I haven't moved away from my earlier points because I'm sticking to my guns; I'm merely elaborating on them further in the hope to getting the point across to you and your comrades.

Nice try at baiting me, though.  talk 

Toxicity label: obscene