And not arguing semantics is the last defence of someone who knows they are wrong or won't admit they are wrong. If I understand AGK correctly, he believes I was attempting to be malicious. He assumed I was saying something that I wasn't trying to. Instead of saying "it was not constructive" (which is untrue and not blockable) he backed his block by implying that I meant something I did not. There are no semantics about it. AGK simply does not believe me when I say it was simple wordplay. So how about you go tell everyone in that section that it was not collaborative? It obviously was since they responded. AGK is the one who had a knee-jerk reaction to it. All that was needed was "Dude, 'cancer' can be taken the wrong way. Strike it or get blocked." Instedd he waited until HOURS after I had edited to make a 24 hour block. So don;t argue semantics with me: Jusitify your poor reaction. Not punitive my ass.  01:30

Toxicity label: obscene