Reply to Alison - An ATHEIST deals with topics such as Lingam and approves someone like Buddhipriya who remains silent for a while and suddenly revamps whole article (guerilla warfare) disregarding all discussions done and starts with the same old questions.There is quite an alliance of all u racist whites. Well CIRCUMCISED SPIRITUAL LOSERS commonion.

Reply to Lunarian - And someone like Lunarian talks about Sanathana Sarati on discussion page of Lingam.Boss there is not only Sarathi there is also a Sanathana destroyer of all evils. Look out for it.

Reply to dab-
"Insisting to call mainstream academic view (which is decisive for Wikipedia, like it or not) "Western" is a tendentious red herring used by those who have otherwise no case, or no patience to build it."  - by user dab in Lingam discussion 
My reply: Which mainstream are you talking about?
All those anglicised dictionaries cannot adjudge the worthiness of the symbol since there are hundreds of words which can never be described by English.Thats a limitation of English.Now u will ask evidences for that.Stupid fellow - English was never a primary language of India and will never be in near future and no proper scholar will ever write in English just to put on wiki. If you don;t care for cross cultural sensitivity then let be ur nonsense prevail on wiki since I think its completely for English readers and not for all, and what I thought about wiki being sensitive and complete would become a myth.Try these things on christianity - you will be hammered and that too on first two paras - never - shows ur intolerence and u talk about my tolerence! Its all "peeled off white" here on wiki........ great sense of prostitution and inferiority complex. God save thee.

Toxicity label: other