Again, I fail to even understand why you are fighting me on this.  If even one person is offended by the way something is worded, and it can be fixed so that it works for everyone, then why not?  I've already exhausted all possible explanations I have for why I want to change it, yet you keep talking in circles, returning to points I've already debated - such as "mainstream validity".  The "mainstream" is white.  You also seemed to miss where I said that I had no problem with rewording all instances of "whites" to "white people", even though I throughly explained why that was not a double standard.  So, there are only two reasons I can think of that you insist on keeping the present wording - 1) to lord over the article and "be right", or 2) you are yourself, to some degree, a racist.  Giving you the benefit of the doubt, I'll assume number 1.  Either way, I no longer care.  I've come to realize that I am too forward-thinking for average minds, and Wikipedia has demonstrated to me on two occasions now that it is run by - your favorite people - the mainstream, those run of the mill, tragically indoctrinated, morons.  It is exactly because they are so impersonal, so bureaucratic, so hive-minded, that they will never achieve even a semblance of real humanity.  Hm, but I digress.  You win.  Congrats.   

Toxicity label: other