"This is laughable. The entire cadre is coming to get me! I didn't register a new username, so it's not a sock puppet, sorry to disappoint you. I was mocking DocFisherKing's use of IP address accounts in order to make it appear that there's more support for his position than there really is. 

 Ryodox " 

 "===12-November-2006=== 

  (also ostensibly , among other IP addresses) has a long history of repeatedly reverting my edits (and the edits of other users) to his own versions of the David Duke page, with accusations of vandalism on my part in the edit summary.    

 

 : No truth in that statement, see for yourself!  
 :: Well, nice try  
 * 208.192.66.196  
 : Record Type:   IP Address  
 :: UUNET Technologies, Inc. UUNET1996B (NET-208-192-0-0-1)  
 ::: 208.192.0.0 - 208.255.255.255 
 :::: WS/EXOP OF KEARNEY MISSOURI DBA UNITE | GREATER KANSAS CITY | 
 ::::: EXOP OF MISSOURI | CLAY COUNTY |UU-208-192-64-D4 (NET-208-192-64-0-1)  
 :::::: 208.192.64.0 - 208.192.79.255 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kearney%2C_Missouri&diff;=prev&oldid;=87189434 

 You didn't fool me!  

 LOL. That "evidence" shows that I am now logged in from the IP of 208.192.66.196. I've been found out! Seriously, though, you're being ridiculous, this is the same disregard for Wikipedia policy that I'm referring to. Someone else will remove your impertinent "evidence" soon enough. 
  " 

 Whatever you say, it's evidence!  

 ;Suspected sockpuppeteer 

  
 ;Suspected sockpuppets 

  
 ::::: 

Toxicity label: other